Loading...
1983 03 15 CC, AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CITY OF LA QUINTA A regular meeting to e held at the La Quinta Hotel, La Cita Room, 49-499 Eisenhower Drive, La Quinta, California. March 15, 1983 7:30 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Flag Salute 2. ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for citizens to address the City Council on matters relating to City business. When addressing the Council, please state your name and address. The proceedings of the Council meetings are recorded on tape, and of each person shall be limited to three minutes. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 5. CONT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS 6. HEARINGS A. A public hearing regarding Change of Zone Case No. 83-001, for property located easterly from Eisenhower Drive and northerly from the La Quinta Stormwater Channel, Landmark Land Company, Applicant. 1. Report from the Planning Commission. v 2. Ordinance for introduction. B. A public bearing regarding adoption of a General Plan for the City and a joint public hearing with the La Quinta Planning Commissions regarding Change of Zone Case No. 83-002, prezoning for annexation. 1. Report from the Associate Planner. 2. Report from the Associate Planner. 3. Report from the City Manager. 4. Resolution of the City Council regarding a General Plan. 5. Resolution of the Planning Commission regarding Change of Zone Case No. 83-002. 6. Ordinance for introduction regarding Change of Zone Case No. 83-002. 7. Resolution of the City Council regarding annexation of territory. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR xA. Approval of the Minutes of the regular meeting of March 1, 1983. B. PROPOSED RESOLUTION. A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QIJINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEMANDS. BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , City Council Marc 15, 1983 Page Two. 8. BUSINESS SESSION A. PROPOSED ORDINANCE. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING REGULATIONS RELATING TO THE REQUIRED HEIGHT OF FENCING AROUND SWIMMING POOLS. 1 Ordinance for adoption. B. PROPOSED RESOLUTION. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE EFFORTS OF THE WATER TASK FORCE COMMITTEE TO DOCUMENT PROBLEMS AND COIPLAINTS BY CUSTOMERS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY WHICH WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION UNDER RATE INCREASE REQUEST NO. 82-10-11 NOI #77-W). 1. Resolution for adoption. C. Report from the City Manager regarding the Retired Senior Volunteer Program. * 1. Resolution for adoption. 2. Motion for adoption. D. Report from the Community Safety Coordinator regarding the purchase of light utility pick-up trucks. 1. Resolution for adoption. 2. Motion for adoption. E. Other. 9. ADJOURNMENT BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , March 11, 193 Mayor Wolff and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta PO Box 1504 La Quinta, California 92253 My six months as an active member of the La Quinta Water Task Force, plus my familiarity with the area as a resident, businessman and farmer for over 50 years, tells me this Cove area of La Quinta rests upon a ticking time bomb one that threatens both the health and safety of its residents. I call upon the City of La Quinta to authorize and fund a survey by their City Engineer of the water system in the Cove area owned by Southern California Water Company. The results are to be submitted to the Public Utilities Commission, along with other materials gathered by the Water Task Force Committee, to document our case in the pending rate hearings. As you may know, the water system is over 50 years old its beginning was in a time of no inspectionS and minimum health stan- dards as well as light usage. This same system operates today with additions and repairs made over the years. Most all of these are inadequate or substandard. The results of our survey as well as visual inspection, shows: 1) Substandard, decaying, under-sized mains; 2) two old, concrete, block or stone reservoirs whiG h leak and overflow) holding at maximum 400,000 gallons total, 3) five 5) wells of varying age and depth, several of which are too shallow by todays standards drawing upon surface water which is highly polluted by the local method of sewage disposal, i.e., septic tanks and cesspools; 4) survey results show low pressure, bad taste, bad smell, rust and sand and other objects in the water, frequent leaks and breaks in the mains and a sizeable number of complaints of diarrhea and intestinal distress which ended when bottled water was substituted, 5) in the event of an earthquake or the 100 year flood', the community would be without fresh water as the pipes and reservoir would surely fail; and 6) only massive infusions of chlorine allow the water to meet minimum health requirements. Also, further growth and development, both residential and cornirer- cial, in the area served by Southern California Water Company which is now inadequate and menacing, would be impossible. BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 ,Mayor and City Council Marc 11, 19S3 Page Two. I urge you to act promptly in the best interests of the community in which we live, love and try to serve Respectfully, flanleysniff SS: aj cc: Frank Usher, City Manager Doug Brown, Community Safety Coordinator Kay Wolff, Chairman Water Task Force BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , $4 MEMORANDUM CITY OF LA QUINTA To: Fellow Council><embers City Manager and City Attorney From: Fred Wolff Date: 3/10/83 Subject: Building Standards A few days ago I looked at the plans of a couple of duplexes being build at this time in La Quinta. To me they are really not very desirable in terms of what we seek to establish as an image for our community, in terms of size, style and architectural design. They are being constructed in the area where the other multi-unit dwellings are located, and I think the potential for a La Quinta slum-area in that neighborhood is very great some years hence. We have quality control over single residences and major developments. But there is a void for the 1'in-between11, such as duplexes or four unit buildings, or apartment houses. There are county standards, but they seem minimal, and our planning department's hands are tied until standards are established. I recommend that we charge the Planning Commission to reco- mmend such standards relating to the following for the above mentioned construction: 1. Size of units 2. Covered parking and/or garages 3. Roof overhang 4. Architectural design 5. Landscaping. And any other standards the Commission deems appropriate. I think this action is urgent and needed if we seek to protect La Quinta as a desirable community and maintain the standards we have often talked about. A 5. BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , MEMORANDUM CITY OF LA QUINTA To: The Honorable Mayor and ribEs of the City Council From: The Planning Commission Date: March 15, 1983 Subject: Change of Zone Case No. 83-001, A Request by Landmark Land Cry to Rezone 51 Acres frn R-2 multiple Family Residential) to R-5 Open pace Combining Zone Residential Developments) RECNDAT ION That the City Council approve Change of Zone Case No.83-001 in accordance with the following findings and as shown on Exhibit A Background The applicant is requesting a Change of Zone fran R-2 i1tiple Family Residential) to R-5 Open Space Combining Zone Residential Developments) on 51 acres. The site is bounded by the Santa Rosa Cove development on the north, Eisenhower Drive on the east and the La Quinta Stormwater Channel and golf course on the south and west. The surrounding zoning includes w-l to the south and west, R-2-8000 to the north, and R-5 and R-2 zoning to the east. Under the original Specific Plan No. 121-E, Eisenhower Drive was proposed to cross through the flood channel as a surface street rather than over the iannel via a bridge. Therefore additional land along the north and south banks of the waterway was set aside to provide for rre gradual grades on the banks of the channel to acccte the roadway. Thus, this site was zoned W-l Watercourse and Waterways). When the bridge was built instead, the channel was constructed with steeper banks thereby leaving excess land adjacent to the bridge approaches which was no longer needed for the waterway. When Specific Plan 121-E was revised in 1982, the site was redesigned as multiple Family Residential, and through Change of Zone 3491, it was rezoned fran w-l to R-2. The applicant now intends to sell this excess land to a party owning the adjacent condominium units located within the Santa Rosa Cove development. Tb accomplish this, Landmark Land pany has filed Tentative Parcel Map No. l9l8 in conjunction with this zoning reiest. Planning Considerations Although the site is adjacent to Eisenhower Drive, access to the street is currently restricted by a block wall along the frontage. The site is separated from the road within the Santa Rosa Cove development located to the north by three 3) condominiums and a small strip of R-5 zoned ocoroon area which is a part of that development. BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 ,MERANDUM The Honorable Mayor and ers of the City Council STAFF REPORT Page Two. Planning Considerations Cont'd) Concerning the it of allowing direct access to Eisenhower Drive, both the staff and the applicant agreed that the location of a driveway on the bridge approach could create a traffic safety hazard. The applicant intends to obtain an easement fran Anden Corporation across the strip of coanon area belonging to Santa Rosa Cove to provide for pedestrian access between the adjacent Condardilitirris and the site, which will be owned by the s party. The Commission concluded that since access to the site will be restricted, the property would be best suited for develoent of recreational and open space uses rather than the construction of a dwelling. The applicant concurred with this recndation. In addition, the visual aspects of the construction of a house was considered by the Commission. If a dwelling was built on this lot, the southward views of the three adjacent condominium units could be blocked. Therefore, the CTmission recarunded that the development on this site be limited to recreational uses with ijini ted low-lying structures which will not block the views frrt the adjacent buildings. The proposed R-5 zoning would help provide this assurance. The applicant agreed with this recommendation. Findings 1. The zoning is consistent with Specific Plan No. 121-F Revised and the General Plan designation of ium Density Residential. 2. The proposed zoning is consistent with the surrounding zonings. 3. The proposed zoning would be caratible with the adjacent existing develoent. Conclusion and Recrmeridatiori Based upon the above findings, the Planning Cartn'ssion recaneends that the City Council approve Change of Zone Case No.83-001 fran R-2 to R5, in accordance with the attached Exhibit dmv BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , * MEMORANDUM CITY OF LA QUINTA To: The Honorable yor and 4nbers of the City Council From: La Quinta Planning Commission Date: March 11, 1983 Subject: Adoption of a General Plan REc(MENDATICN That the City Council adopt the Riverside County Cove Cflrities General Plan, Coachella-Thermal-Indio General Plan and Circulation Element, as amended, and adopt the environmental Negative Declaration based upon the following findings. BACKGROUND Prior to the Citys incorporation, development within La Quinta was reviewed by Riverside County under one of two adopted general plans. The area west of Washington Street was addressed by the Cove Communities General Plan, while that area east of Washington Street was included within the Coachella-Thermal-Indio General Plan. In addition, the Riverside County Circulation Element addressed the general plan for the roadways within our City. Although state law allows a newly incorporated city up to 30 months to adopt a general plan, it is appropriate for the City to adopt a general plan at this time in order to provide addlional guidance for development within both the current City limits and the proposed Sphere of Influence. Also, an adopted general plan is needed prior to the prezoning of land for the purpose of annation. U USE FIEMENT As previously mentioned, the area within the City is addressed by the Land Use Elements of both the Cove ccunities and the Coachella-Thermal-Indio General Plans. The following is a list of the applicable land use category. and their allowed residential densities: Classification Density Very Tc Density pesidential 3 units/acre or less Low Density Residential 3-5 units/acre diuin Density Residential 5-10 units/acre High Density Residential 10-20 units/acre Open Space and Planned Residential Dcvelont 3 units/acre or less General Ocomercial Water Course and Equestrian BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 ,La Quinta Planning ssTon Report Mrch 11, 1983 Page Two. The Planing OssiOn recomends that the City Council adopt the consolidation of these two general plans, subject to the followin( Irflflt5: 1. For that area west of Washington Street fran Fred War in Drive south to the Whitewater River Channel, change the designation from High, dium and Density Residential to Lo Density Residential. The reason for this change is to rna(e this area compatible with the adopted general plan of the adjoining City of Indian Wells. 2. For that area extending from Washington Street eastward to the midsection line which is the sair alignment followed by Washington Street south of Highway 111), between Fred Waring Drive and the Whitewater River Channel, change the area designated as Very T Density Residential to Medium Density Residential. This proposed exsion will provide additional depth for medium density development which is appropriate to locate along this major traffic corridor. In addition, the proposed designation will overlap the existing property boundaries in this area. 3. Change the designation from Very Tt Density Residential to IDW Density Resi- dential for the following areas: from the aforementioned midsection line eastward to the Adams Street Alignment, between Fred Waring Drive and the Whitewater River Channel; from the Adams Street alignment eastward to Dune Palms Road, between Miles Avenue and the Whitewater River; and from Dune Palms Road eastward to the Indio city limits south of Westward Ho Drive to the Whitewater River. The reason for this change is that the area is suitable for a slightly higher density development due to its flat topography, the strong probability that services will be extended into the area from the Washington Street corridor, and that the proposed density would be aompatible with existing developeent in the area. In addition, this designation will help provide for conventional single-family house subdivisions versus planned unit developeents), thereby providing a wider range of housing types in the unity. Concerning the area south of Westward Ho Drive, the proposed amendment will bring the General Plan into liance with the existing development. 4. mend the designation of Very Density Residential to include the addendum Planned Developeents" for the following areas: from the Adams Street align- inent eastward to Jefferson Street, between Fred Waring Drive and Miles Avenue; and from Dune Palms Road eastward to the Whitewater River, between Miles Avenue and Westward Ho Drive. The reason for this change is to provide additional assurance that the future development within this area is consis- tent with the existing type of development in the adjoining Bermuda Dunes Country Club and Indian Springs Country Club. 5. For that area between Highway 111 and the Whitewater River Channel, from Washington Street to Jefferson Street, change the designation from Medium Density Residential to General Commercial. The current designation allows quasi-commercial uses such as offices and hotels. In addition, Riverside County has approved commercial zoning within this area. The commercial desig- nation would not be a substantial change from the previous plan and would provide a more logical and appropriate land use designation. This area will be included within the proposed Highway 111 North Specific Plan Area". BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 ,La Quinta Planning Commission Report March 11, 1983 Page Three. 6. Far that area generally 1300 feet south of Highway 111 between Washington Street and the Indio city limits, amend the designation from ium and Density Residential to General Commercial. The purpose for this is the same as mentioned in the above amendment. In addition, the wider area will allow for development other than strip mercial and aid in the development of a secondary road access system needed to concentrate and funnel traffic frn commercial businesses along Highway 111 in lieu of each lot having direct highway access. This area will be included within the proposed Highway 111 South Specific Plan' 7. For that area south of the above mentioned commercial area 1300 feet to the Avenue 48 alinement between Adams Street and Jefferson Street, change those areas designated as Very IDW Density Residential to Low Density Residential. The boundaries for the land use designations shown for this area by the County's Coachella-Thermal-Indio General Plan were based upon the assumption that the Highway 111 Bypass, which would divert traffic to Avenue 48, would be constructed. Since this proposed bypass is recTThended for deletion by the City, it is appropriate that the land use designations for this area be amended accordingly. In addition, the proposal would provide for a suitable transition area between the commercial uses to the north and the lower density Figgie ATO) planned residential development to the south. Since this area is intended to act as a transition zone between the adjacent commercial and residential areas, it is vital that serious consideration be given to how it will relate to these adjoining areas with respect to the types and densities of uses permitted, the design considerations and the circulation patterns. Therefore, this area will be included within the Highway 111-South Specific Plan Area as a means to further study these concerns and establish criteria which will ensure that future development is both corrpatiole and complementary within this area. CIBCDLATI ELEMENT The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the County Circulation Element with the following anendeents: 1. Calle Tampico west of Eisenhower Drive should be reduced frorrL a major' street with a 100-foot wide right of way to a *`local' street with a 60 foot wide right of way. The basis for this is that the traffic along this portion does not warrant a 100-foot wide street, especially in light of the fact that its northern boundary will remain in golf course use and not be developed into residential lots. The local designation would have the same width as the existing neighborhood residential streets throughout the City. 2. The proposed Highway 111 bypass should be deleted. 3. Designate Avenue 48 between Washington Avenue and Jefferson Street as a road with a 100 foot wide right of way. In addition, it should be designated as a Specific Plan Road as a means to provide the City with more design flexi- bility than currently permitted under the street stahdards adopted frem Piverside County. The specific plan will address the layout of the autocobile travel and BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 ,La Qilinta Planning Carinission Report March 11, 1983 Page Four. turn lanes, possible bicycle lanes, landscaping reuireeents along the right of way, building setbacks and the design of the intersections with Adams Street and Dune Palms Road. 4. Asend the existing designation of the right of ways for Adams Street and Dune Palms Poad far that area between Highway 111 and Avenue 48 fran a 60 feet wide local street to a 100 foot wide major' street. In addition, amend the desig- nation on Adams Street between Highway 111 northward to Avenue 46 frem local to secondary' with an 88 foot right of way in order to make this poftion of the road consistent with the road's designated right of way to the north. A major concern of the Planning Crinission has been the lack of roved north- south streets which could be used as alternative routes to Washington Street. The possible develoxnent of Adams Street and/or flLlne Palms Road as major roads will provide the much needed traffic and utilities corridors through the area between Jefferson Street and Washington Street. Lastly, the develont of the proposed specific plan areas to the north and south of Highway 111 will provide for an alternate system of streets and reciprocal access easeeents which will serve the purpose to concentrate and funnel the traffic generated by the canmercial developeent. The objective is to limit the nur of access points onto Highway 111 as a means to limit cross traffic and minimize congestion as this area develops. ADDITIAL Cd*S An environmental assessmt was prepared by the planning staff for the proposed general plan. Ori the basis of this information, staff has tentatively concluded that the proposed amendeents to the County S general plans will not result in a significant Th!Pact on the environment and a negative declaration has been coopleted. In addition, prior to any developeent within the project area, additional environmental review will be completed in accordance with the City' 5 adopted QEQA guidelines and State requirrts. FIND INCS 1. The proposed General Plan is consistent with the goals and obectives of the City of La Quinta. 2. The proposal is consistent with the existing and proposed developeent within the area. 3. The proposed plan will provide for the logical and orderly owth of the City. 4. The proposed General Plan will not have a significant AInpact on the environment. REoMENCATION Based upon the above findings, Staff recoeeends the adoption of the Riverside County Cove munities Ceneral Plan, Coachella-Thermal-Indio General Plan and the County Circulation Eleeerit, as amended, and adoption of the negative declaration prepared for the environmental assessment. S:aj BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , 4-4 ffi MEMORANDUM CITY OF LA QUINTA Honorable yor and Mrrbers of the City Council To: Honorable Chairman and rers of the Planning nission From: Sandra L. Bonner, Associate Planner Date: March 11, 1983 Subject: Change of Zone Case No. 83-002, City Initiated Prezoning of Proposed Area to be Annexed. REoMECAIS That the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of Change of Zone Case No. 83-002, based upon the findings and in accordance with Hxhibit *A" and that the Commission recommend adoption of the Negative Declaration prepared for the environmental assessment. That the City Council approve Change of Zone Case No. 83-002, based upon the findings and in accordance with Fibit and that the Council adopt the Negative Declaration prepared for the environmental assessment. EACKGPOUND As required by the State law under Section of the Government Code, La Quinta is required to approve and adopt prezoning for the area proposed for annexation prior to the City siinitting an annexation application to the Riverside County Local Agency Formation commission LAFCO). Change of Zone Case No. 83-002 is a City-initiated request for the prezoning of the area which is described as follows: That area generally bounded by Fred Waring Drive on the North, the Washington Street section line on the West, the northerly boundary of the City of La Quinta on the South, and Jefferson Street and the Indio City boundary on the East. If the La Quinta City Council determines that a smaller area than that shown on the attached Exhibit A' would be appropriate for annexation at this time, then the boundaries of the proposed prezoning area will be adjusted accordingly on the exhibit. NYSTS The reended zoning classifications and residential densities are consistent with the La Quinta General Plan as tentatively approved the City Planning Commission. In general, Staff is recommending that the area north of the White- water River be zoned as residential with a gradation of the maximum allowed densities from Medium Density Residential 5-10 units per acre) along Washington Street to Very Low Density Residential 3 units or less per acre) in the eastern BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 ,Staff Peportlange of Zone Case No. 83-002 March 11, 1983 Page T. portion of the project area. South of the Whitewater River Commercial zoning is proposed for the Highway 111 corridor area west of Jefferson Street. Lastly, the area south of the commercial area and adjacent to the City limits is proposed for low Density Residential 3-5 units per are). The following analysis is a discussion of the recnded general zoning requirements and the proposed zoning for each of the three planning areas described above. GENERAL ZONE REQUIREMENTS The City of La Quinta has adopted Riverside County Land Use Ordinance No.348; therefore the proposed zoning has the same permitted uses and design standards as the zoning currently existing within this area see attaant for the general zone descriptions). flow-over, the setback requirements and design standards may be rrdified for the property located within the designated proposed Highway 111 Specific Plan areas and adjacent to Fred Waring Drive and Avenue 48, which are specific plan roads as they are currently designated by the County). Prior to the adoption of any area plan which may rrodify the development standards, all property owners and interested parties will be encouraged to participate in the City' S formulation and adoption of the specific plan. MINIMUM DETNG SIZE Presently the minimum dwelling size within the City of La Quinta is 1200 sauare feet. Tn the interests of consistency, Staff recommends that this requirement be placed on all residential zoning within the proposed annexation area. Concerning possible variances of this requirement, Staff reends that the City adopt the policy that reql.lests for exceptions be considered only in those instances where the proposed rLaller dwellings are condominiums or attached housing within a planned residential development, the nurrber of smaller units constitutes no nore than 10 percent of the total number of housing units being proposed, that the smaller units are not clustered or concentrated in a limited nurrcr of areas but rather spread evenly throughout the development, and that they are located on the site in those areas which will minimize any conflicts with existing and proposed larger units located adjacent to the project. The process for obtaining approval for smaller units will be processed concurently with the development plans for the entire project and will require hearings before the Planning Coomission and City Council and the notification of surrounding property owners. The purpose for allowing a limited number of smaller units is that it will provide flexibility for the developers of larger planned residential developments in providing a broader range of unit types to market and it will provide a wider range of single- family housing types for the residents within La Quinta without detrjinentally affecting the quality of development. In addition, this provision recognizes the fact that since approximately 30 percent of the new housing within planned developments in La QLijnta is purchased as second homes by people with permanent residences outside of the area, these people may desire a smaller sized home for their seasonal use PPOPCSED ZCNING TN WASHTNGN STREET In accordance with the proposed La Quinta General Plan, Staff records that the zoning along Washington Street be R-2-8000 multiple family residential 8000 square feet lot area per dwelling) for that area shown on Exhibit A". BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 ,Staff Report-laflge of Zone Case 83-002 Mrch 11, 1983 Page Three. This designation will permit residential developnent at an overall average of 5 units per acre. The zoning on the east side of the street may be increased to allow a density of up to 10 units per acre, with the actual density to be determined when a change of zone request is submitted with development plans for property within this area. Because of this area's proximity to Indian Wells, the La Quinta City Staff has discussed the planning and zoning of this land with the Planning Director of Indian Wells. Although that City's general plan currently designates the east side of Washington Street as Very Dow Density Residential, they are considering the possibility of encouraging limited resort rcial uses to locate within this area. Therefore it is likely that this area around Washington Street, from Fred Waring Drive to the itewater River Cnannel, will be re-evaluated in the near future with respect to allowing limited areas and types of resort onmercial uses. PPOPOSED ZTNG IN THE ADAMS SThEr ARTA As shown on Exhibit A, R-1 single family residential) zoning is proposed for that area one quarter mile on either side of the Adams Street alignrrLent, excluding the square one-guarter mile section at the northeast corner of Adams Street and Miles Avenue. Th addition, 9.6 acres of land located 340 feet westerly from the intersection of Adams Street with Miles Avenue will be zoned R-T bilehome Subdivision and bil Park) for the purpose of making the zoning consistent with the existing rrbilehe park at that location. The purpose for the R-1 zoning which permits up to 5 units per acre is to provide for an area which can be developed with conventional detached single-family housing subdivisions. The proposed zoning will be coopatible with the existing and proposed development in the area and consistent with the proposed General Plan. In addition, this zoning will help provide for a greater range of housing types within the ccrrmity without adversely affecting the overall quality of development. PROPOSED ZONING NORTh OF WESTD HO DRIVE For that area shown on Exhibit A' as north of Westward Ho Drive and east of Dune Palms Read, and the square quarter-mile section at the northwest corner of Dune Palms Road and Miles Avenue, Staff proposes R-1-12,000/Planned Developments zoning Single-Family Residential, 12,000 square feet lot area per dwelling, planned developments). Since this area is adacent to the Bermuda Dunes Country Club to the north and the Indian Springs Country Club area to the south, Staff recarmends this zoning as a means to maintain consistency and establish continuity in the develont of this area. The proposed zoning is consistent with the proposed General Plan Designation of Very Low Density Residential/Planned Developments. PROPOSED ZONING Scum OF WESTW HO DRTVE Since the majority of the area south of Westward Ho Drive and east of Dune Palms Road, including the area along Vista Grande, has been developed, it is appropriate that the proposed zing be consistent with the zoning under which this area developed. As shown on Exhibit A", R-1 zoning is designated for the area with the following exceptions: the existing golf course and clubhouse areas are zoned R-5 Open Space Coobining Zone-Residential Developments), including that golf course area east of Jefferson Street which was previously zoned as R-1 by BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 ,Staff Report Change of Zone Case No.83-002 Mrch 11, 1983 Page Four. Riverside County; and the existing mobilehome park on Dune Palms Road will retain its R-T bilehane Subdivision and bilehome Park) zoning. The proposed zonings are consistent with both the proposed General Plan designation of Density Residential and the existing develoment in the area. POPOSED ZONING WIThIN THE HIY 111 miDoR Staff is recarmending C-P-S Scenic Highway ccoooercial) zoning for that area north of Highway 111 to the Whitewater River Channel and southward to a min depth of 1250 feet which is consistent with the property boundaries within this area). The County currently designates this general area as R-3-4000 General Residential, 4000 square feet of lot area per elling), a zoning that pennits residential uses and service commercial uses such as offices and motels. The proposed change to ocomercial zoning reflects the reanable use for the land without substantially increasing the intensity of the land use. Since the area on the north side is separated frn the nearby residential areas by the itewater River Channel rrore intensive non-retail crrrcial uses as permitted by the C-P-S zoning) will be encouraged. The greater depth of crmercial zoning on the south side will permit more effective use of the land than the current County zoning of a 300 foot deep strip of R-3-4000 provides. The increased cynercial zoning will also provide for additional revenue urgently needed for the City's tax base. The recoeeended zoning is consistent with the proposed La Quinta General Plan. All the cmmercially zoned property will be within the Highway 111 South and North Specific Plan Areas As addressed in the report on the proposed La Quinta General Plan, the purpose behind the specific plans is to ensure that this gateway area to the City is developed as a cohesive unit with respect to design, setbacks, signage and access. The intent is not to restrict developeent nor require that all the developments look identical, but rather to facilitate the extensions, utilities and roadways into the area in a means which best suits the needs of cormercial development and to establish a general design theme for cratible architecture. PPOPOSED ZONING FOR I'I[ AREA NORTh OF AVENUE 48 This area will serve as a transition zone between the anmercial area to the north and the 700 acre low density Figgie Corporation ATO) project to the south. The proposed zoning is R-2-8000 Multiple Family Residential 8000 square feet of lot area per dwelling). The recarrmended zoning is consistent with proposed area development and the proposed La Quinta General Plan. Because of this developeent, this area will be strongly influenced by the adjacent coercial area, and will therefore be included within the Highway 111-South Specific Plan Area. Although residential zoning is currently proposed, this may be amended during the specific plan process to allow office use, particularly in the areas of rns Street and Dune Palms Road. ADDIIONAL COMMENTS An environnental assessrrnt was prepared for this project to study the possible inpacts of the proposed changes to the area 5 zoning.Based upon this assessnent, Staff has tentatively determined that the changes to the current zoning will not BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 ,Staff Report Change of Zone Case No. 83-002 Mrch 11, 1983 Page Five. significantly affect the environeent. The study also acknowledges the fact that all new development with the project area will require additional environ- mental assessment at the time of application. On this basis, Staff has tentatively prepared a Negative Declaration for Change of Zone Case No. 83-002. FINDINGS 1. The proposed zoning is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan. 2. The proposed zoning is ooopatible with the existing and proposed developeent within and adjacent to the project area. 3. The proposed residential zoning will permit a wide range of housing types to serve the needs of the City's residents. 4. The proposed crrnerciai zoning will provide for an attractive and appropriate gateway to the City and will also strenthen its tax base. 5. Change of Zone Case No. 83-002 will not have a significant adverse irpact on the environment. Eased upon the above findings, Staff reaTnends that the Planning Corrinission City Council) approve Change of Zone Case No. 83-002 in accordance with the attached Eibit A". BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , MEMORANDUM CITY OF LA QUINTA To: Honorable Mayor and Members of Council From: Frank M. Usher, City Manager Date: March 11, 1983 Subject: Area proposed to be annexed to the City of La Quinta There appears to be sufficient support froin property owners and residents in the proposed Sphere of Influence area to apply for annexation of the entire area. The City of Indian Wells has informed us that the area bounded by Washington Street, the Washington Street section line and the Whitewater flood control channel is presently within the established Sphere of the City of Indian Wells. Indian Wells has requested that the City of La Quinta delete this area from the proposed La Quinta Sphere of Influence and annexation. This area is not of basic necessity to the City of La Quinta, and it could be deleted without causing damage to the basis structure and land use integrity of our proposed Sphere and annexation. It is respectfully recommended that the City of La Quinta propose to annex the area bounded by Fred Waring Drive on the north, Washington Street on the west, the northerly City of La Quinta boundary on the south, and the City of Indio boundary on the east. BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF TE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY. WHEREAS, the planning Commission has duly approved a General Plan for the City pursuant to Sections 65350 et seq. of the Call- fornia Planning and zoning Law, and has transmitted the same to thIs City Council in compliance with Section 65354 of said Law; and WHEREAS, this City Council pursuant to Section 65355 of the Planning and Zoning Law has held at least one public hearing, with notice thereof having been given in compliance with said Section; and WHEREAS, a negative declaration has been prepared upon the environmental assessment of the proposal, and a public hearing after due notice has been held on the adoption of said negative declaration; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of La Quinta does hereby, in conformance with the Planning Commission approval as aforesaid, adopt the negative declaration as referred to hereinabove, and the Riverside County Cove Communities General Plan and the Riverside County Coachella-Thermal-Indio General Plan and the Riverside County Circulation Element, as amended, hereby are adopted to constitute the General Plan of the City of La Quinta. Copies thereof are, and shall remain, on file in the office of the City Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall endorse on the said General Plan the date of its adoption by the City Council and the date of its approval by the City of La Quinta Planning Commissions. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1983. MAYOR AEST:< CIT CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ITYATR< g. BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , RESOLUTION NO. P.C. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL CERTAIN PREZONING OF UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY ADJOINING THE CITY CHANGE OF ZONE CASE NO. 83-002). WHEREAS, there has been submitted to this Planning Commission a proposal that certain unincorporated territory adjoining the City of La Quinta be prezoned as set forth in the Staff Report regarding this Change of Zone Case No. 83-002; and WHEREAS, this Commission has, in accordance with Section 65854 of the California Planning and Zoning Law, held at least one public hearing on said proposal after due notice thereof in accordance with said Section 65854; and WHEREAS, a negative declaration has been prepared upon the environ- mental assessment of the proposal, and a public hearing after due notice has been held on the adoption of said negative declaration; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. The negative declaration as referred to hereinabove, is hereby adopted. SECTION 2. This Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that pursuant to Section 65859 of the California Planning and Zoning Law, that certain unincorporated territory adjoining the City and referred to in the Staff Report regarding this Change of Zone Case No. 83-002 be prezoned to R-1IPUD, R-1, R-2-8000, R-T, R-5, C-P-S and W-l as set forth in said Staff Report. SECTION 3. The said Staff Report is hereby approved and adopted by this Commission and incorporated by this reference as the Commissions report to the City Council; and the reasons for this recommended prezoning and the relationship of the proposed prezoning action to applicable general and specific plans are all as set forth in the said Staff Report. SECTION 4. This decision, recommendation, and Resolution shall forthwith be transmitted to the La Quinta City Council in compliance with the provisions of Section 65855 of the California Planning and Zoning Law. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1983, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, PREZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE CITY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 65859 OF THE CALIFORNIA PLANNING AND ZONING LAW The city council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Pursuant to Section 65859 of the California Planning and Zoning Law, that certain unincorporated territory adjoining the City, as shown on the map which is attached to and made a part of this ordinance and is titled Change of Zone 83-002", is hereby prezoned to R-1/PUD, R-l, R2-8.000, R-T, R-5, C-P-S and W-1 as shown and depicted on said attached map. The said zoning will apply to such property in the event of subsequent annexation to the City. SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty 30) days after passage. SECTION 3. POSTING. The City Clerk shall within 15 days after the passage of this ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least the 3 public places designated by resolution of the City Council; hall certify to the adoption and posting of this ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered in the book of ordinances of this City. The foregoing ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on 1983, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ATTORN Y CIP NAGFR BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, FOR A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION CONSISTING OF AN ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY TO THE CITY. On motion of Councilmember seconded by Councilmember the following resolution is adopted: WHEREAS, the City Council has received a request from voters and property owners within the territory involved that the hereinafter described territory be annexed to the City of La Quinta; WHEREAS, this City Council desires to make application to annex to the City of La Quinta the said territory, as a change of organi- zation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the.City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 35140 and 35110, application is hereby made to the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Riverside for a proposed change of organization as follows: a) This proposal is made pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 35000 et seq., Gov. Code) b) The nature of the proposed change of organization is an annexation of unincorporated territory to the adjoining City of La Quinta. c) The names of all other affected counties, cities and districts are: The City of Indio also adjoins the said unincorporated territory. d) A description of the exterior boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed is described in Exhibit A attached hereto. e) Said territory is inhabited and comprises approxi- mately 1878+ acres. f) % of the owners of the land within such tern tory have given their written consent to such annexa- tion subject to the aforementioned terms and conditions. g) The reasons for this proposal are as follows: g%. q BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE MAP OF THE PROPOSED SPHERE OF INFLUENCE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, that the map of the proposed Sphere of Influence, which has been substituted to the Local Agency Formation Commission, as approved by Resolution No. 83-5, be amended to delete that area bounded by the Washington Street section line on the west, Washington Street on the east and the Whitewater Flood Control Channel on the south; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a map and legal description of the revised requested Sphere of Influence be submitted to the Local Agency Formation Commission. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1983. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANER BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEMANDS. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of he City of La Quinta, California, to approve demands as shown on the Demand/Warrant Register dated March 15, 1983. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 15th day of March, 1983. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 , NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 !, NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 ", ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING REGULATIONS RELATING TO THE REQUIRED HEIGHT OF FENCING AROUND SWIMMING POOLS. The city council of the City of La Quinta, California, dos ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Subsections a. and b. of Section 1.2 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 421 which was adopted by reference by this City Council by Ordinance No. 5 operative August 29, 1982) relating to fencing of swimming pools, hereby are amended to read as follows: Section 1.2. a. Every person who owns or is in possession of any land upon which there is located a swimming pool that exceeds 18 inches in depth shall construct and maintain in good condition, completely surrounding such parcel of land or the swimming pool itself, an enclosure not less than 5 feet in height, consisting of a fence, wall, buildings, or combination thereof. b. The enclosure shall be constructed of chain link fencing of not less than 14-gauge and 2-inch mesh, or concrete, masonry, wood or other solid material designed to withstand 15 pounds per square foot of uniform horizontal load, and constructed so as to discourage climbing by small children. The space between the bottom of the enclosure and the ground shall not exceed 2 inches. All gates or doors through the en- closure shall be equipped with a self-latching device not less than 4 feet from the ground that keeps such gate or door securely closed, or shall be securely locked at all times when the pool is not in use. SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty 30) days after passage. SECTION 3. POSTING. The City Clerk shall within 15 days after the passage of this ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least the 3 public places designated by resolution of the City Council; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance and its certification together with proof of posting, to be entered in the book of ordinances of this City. The foregoing ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held this day of 1983, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 #, NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 $, RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE EFFORTS OF THE WATER TASK FORCE COMMITTEE TO DOCUMENT PROBLEMS AND COMPLAINTS BY CUSTOMERS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY WHICH WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION UNDER RATE INCREASE REQUEST NUMBER 82-10-11 NOI #77-W) WHEREAS, Southern California Water Company purchased the Santa Carmelita Water Company in September, 1978, with a Dromise to their new customers to provide good quality water and service to the community served, as well as upgrade and improve the antiquated system; and WHEREAS, there has been upgrading, modernizing or visible evidence of a capital improvement program; and WHEREAS, the public dissatisfaction with Southern California Water Company's water quality, taste, smell and purity, as well as the storage and delivery system, is being voiced from all areas served; and WHEREAS, the system was and is inadequate to meet County fire flow standards; and WHEREAS, in November, 1982, the City Council was required to reduce fire flow requirements for the City from 1500 gpm to 500 gpm which is highly unsatisfactory for long term development and safety of the community; and WHEREAS, the Southern California Water Company has now pending before the P.U.C. requests for massive rate increases with no promise of improvement in service, water guality or the system itself. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a reasonable rate increase can be justified only by a defined program to upgrade and modernize the entire storage and delivery system, assuring each and every Southern California Water Company customer in La Quinta a dependable, good quality water system. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Southern California Water Company, as a public utility, has certain responsibilities both implicit and explicit, which they have to date not fulfilled to this community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, to support efforts of the Water Task Force Committee and request the Southern California Water Company to fulfill its responsibilities to the community now. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1983. BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 %, NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 &, MEMORANDUM CITY OF LA QUINTA To: Honorable ayor and Members of Council From: Frank M. Usher, City Manager Date: March 1l 1983 Subject: Coachella Valley Retired Senior Volunteer Program Upon my recommendation, the Council previously chose to nOt participate in the Coachella Valley Retired Senior Volunteer Program, but did express willingness to reconsider the matter when further information regarding service to La Quinta could be provided. This information is in the attached letter from Mr. Henry Withrow. In consideration of this information, it seems appropriate to join the other cities of the valley in support of this program. Sufficient funds are available for this purpose Approval of the accompanying resolution of appropriation and a motion to authorize participation is respectfully recommended. 3.2. BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 ', RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROPRIATING FUNDS, TRANSFERRING $665.00 TO ACCOUNT NO. 01-4190-102, NON-DEPARTMENTAL-R. S.V.P. PROGRAM, FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS, GENERAL FUND. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. $665.00 is hereby transferred to Account No. 01-4190-102, Non-Departmental-R.S.V.P. Program, from the Unappropriated Surplus, General Fund. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1983. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: T1'<AGER CITY ATTORNEY BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 (, NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 ), NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 *, MEMORANDUM CITY OF LA QUINTA To: Frank Usher, City Manager From: Doug Brown, Community Safety Coordinator Date: February 28, 1983 Subject: CIT! VEHICLE BIDS The bids for two 2) 1/2 ton light utility pickup trucks have been received and opened with the following results. BIDDER UNIT PRICE SALES TAX TOTAL COST SIMON MOTORS $7.17 $ 895.70 $15,82.0 IMPERIAL MOTORS $75O.oo $ 89.oo $15,79.00 TOYOTA OF INDlO $6632.00 * 795.8 $1'4,059.84 BRETZ MAZDA $6286.00 $ 75'4.32 $13,326.32 Bretz Mazda of Indio was our lowest bidder and Mr. Farley, the sales manager for Bretz, has informed me he can deliver the two vehicles immediately as they are in stock on his lot. Mazda has met or exceeded all of the specifications for the vehicles. It is my understanding that $10,000 was budgeted for the purchase of one pickup truck during the 82-83 FY budget. For an approximate 33% increase in that budgeted amount we can receive an additional vehicle. It is my recommendation that we accept the lowest bid by Bretz Mazda and take delivery of the vehicles at the soonest possible convenience. Respectfully submitted, 0 f(; Douglas Brown, Community Safety Coordinator BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 +, RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROPRIATING FUNDS, TRANSFERRING $3,326.32 TO ACCOUNT NO. 01-4190430, NON-DEPARTMENTAL-EQUIPMENT, VEHICLE, FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS, GENERAL FUND. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. $3,326.32 is hereby transferred to Account No. 01-4190-430, Non-Departmental Equipment, Vehicle, from the Unappropriated Surplus, General Fund. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1983. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ATTORNE TY4NAGER BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02 ,, AAihD + Fm 78 105 CALLE ESTADO LA QUINTA CALIFORNIA 92253 619) 564-2246 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF LOCATION OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the La Quinta City Council meeting to be held March 15, 1983, will be held at the La Quinta Hotel, La Cita Room, 49-499 Eisenhower Irive, La Quinta, California, at 7:30 p.m. Frank N. Usher City Clerk NOTE: The La Quinta Planning Commission will meet jointly with the City Council at the above time and place. MAILING ADDRESS P.O. BOX 1504 LA QUINTA. CALIFORNiA 92253 BIB] 09-18-1996-U01 10:35:00AM-U01 CC-U02 03-U02 15-U02 1983-U02