The URL can be used to link to this page

2016 12 20 CCI W GEM of for DESERT — City Council agendas and staff reports are available on the City's web page: www.la-quinta.orq CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta REGULAR MEETING ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 20, 2016 3:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION 1 4:00 P.M. OPEN SESSION CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Fitzpatrick, Pena, Radi, Sanchez, Mayor Evans PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. please complete a "Request to Speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. The City Council values your comments; however in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by GC 54954.2(b). CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OR (3) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 1) 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(d)(1). ALVERIZ ET AL. V. CITY OF LA QUINTA ET AL., RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. PSC 1503161; BARTON ET AL. V. CITY OF LA QUINTA ET AL., RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. PSC 1505200 3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF EISENHOWER DRIVE AND AVENIDA FERNANDO (APNS 658-170-015, 658-170-016, AND 658-420-031) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 1 DECEMBER 20, 2016 CITY NEGOTIATOR: FRANK J. SPEVACEK, CITY MANAGER PROPERTY OWNER: BT-LJMJM, LLC., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY/JACK MCGRORY UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT AND/OR DISPOSITION OF THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE AT 4:00 P.M. REPORT ON ACTIONS(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and limit -your comments to three minutes. The City Council values your comments; however in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by GC 54954.2(b). ANNOUNCEMENTS PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. EQUALITY ACT PROCLAMATION 2. LEADERSHIP INVESTMENT AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING - CITY OF LA QUINTA ACADEMY RECOGNITION 3. AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION 2015/16 PROJECT MERIT AWARD FOR TURF REDUCTION CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: Consent Calendar items are routine in nature and can be approved by one motion. PAGE 1. APPROVE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 6, 2016 2. APPROVE REVISIONS TO THE CITY'S ARTWORK DONATION POLICY 15 3. APPROVE RECIPIENT FOR THE 2017 SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARD 21 4. ADOPT A RESOLUTION CONSENTING TO INCLUDE PROPERTIES 45 WITHIN THE CITY'S JURISDICTION IN THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY AND OPEN A PROPERTY ASSESSED CLEAN ENERGY PROGRAM [RESOLUTION NO. 2016-0471 5. ADOPT RESOLUTIONS (1) APPROVING TWO AGREEMENTS WITH THE 51 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 2 DECEMBER 20, 2016 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION TO PREPARE FOR AND TO ADMINISTER THE VOTER -APPROVED ONE PERCENT (1%) TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX, AND (2) SETTING FORTH THE EMPLOYEE POSITIONS AUTHORIZED TO EXAMINE TAX RECORDS [RESOLUTION NOS. 2016-048 AND 2016-0491 6. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED DECEMBER 2 AND DECEMBER - 9, 2016 7. RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ANNUAL REPORT 8. RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT - FEE REPORT BUSINESS SESSION 1. ADOPT A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SPEED LIMITS FOR CERTAIN STREETS [RESOLUTION NO. 2016-0501 STUDY SESSION - NONE PUBLIC HEARINGS — 5:00 P.M. For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to consideration of that item. A person may submit written comments to City Council before a public hearing or appear in support or opposition to the approval of a project(s). If you challenge a project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. 1. ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO (1) MODIFY PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005, INCLUDING THE SITE PLAN, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND LANDSCAPING FOR PLANNING AREAS 2, 3 AND 4 OF THE SILVERROCK SPECIFIC PLAN IN RESPONSE TO APPEAL 2016-0004; AND (2) SUSTAIN FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2014-1003; PROJECT LOCATION - SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 52 AND JEFFERSON STREET [RESOLUTION NO.2016-0511 2. INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING ORDINANCE NO. 552 AMENDING CHAPTERS 9.60 AND 9.100 OF TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR SPECIAL EVENT REGULATIONS 3. ADOPT A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS AND A STATEMENT OF CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 3 DECEMBER 20, 2016 OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND CERTIFYING THE VILLAGE BUILD -OUT PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT; AND, INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING ORDINANCE NO. 553 AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE BUILD -OUT PLAN FOR THE LA QUINTA VILLAGE, INCLUDING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ASSOCIATED THERETO [RESOLUTION NO.2016-0521 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 1. CITY MANAGER 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK 4. COMMUNITY RESOURCES - NOVEMBER 2016 5. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT 6. FACILITIES PROGRAMS AND WELLNESS REPORT 1101 MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1105 1109 1. CVAG COACHELLA VALLEY CONSERVATION COMMISSION (Evans) 2. CVAG ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE (Evans) 3. CVAG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (Evans) 4. GREATER PALM SPRINGS CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU (Evans) 5. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES DELEGATE (Evans) 6. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POLICY COMMITTEE (Evans) 7. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (Evans) 8. CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY (Alternate: Maysels) 9. COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (Alternate: Pena) 10. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INFO EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (Vacant) 11. JACQUELINE COCHRAN REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (Alternate: Pena) 12. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY (Alternate: Radi) 13. AD HOC COMMITTEE TO EVALUATE CITY CANNABIS OPTIONS (Pena & 1 vacancy) 14. CVAG PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE (Alternate: Pena) 15. DESERT SANDS SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (2 vacancies) 16. IID ENERGY CONSUMERS' ADVISORY COMMITTEE (Alternate: Radi) 17. EAST VALLEY COALITION (Alternate: Pena) 18. ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION (Pena) 19. CVAG VALLEY -WIDE HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE (Pena) 20. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RCTC) (Radi) 21. CVAG TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE (Radi) 22. COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Radi & 1 vacancy) 23. COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MINUTES DATED NOVEMBER 14, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 4 DECEMBER 20, 2016 2016 24. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED SEPTEMBER 13 AND 1137 OCTOBER 11, 2016 25. ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW BOARD MINUTES 1149 DATED JUNE 15 AND SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 ADJOURNMENT ********************************* The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on January 3, 2017 commencing with closed session at 3:00 p.m. and open session at 4:00 p.m. at the City Hall Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Susan Maysels, City Clerk, of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting was posted on the City's website, near the entrance to the Council Chambers at 78-495 Calle Tampico, and the bulletin boards at the Stater Brothers Supermarket at 78-630 Highway 111, and the La Quinta Cove Post Office at 51-321 Avenida Bermudas, on December 16, 2016. DATED: December 16, 2016 SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California Public Notices • The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's office at 777-7103, twenty- four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. • If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's office at 777- 7103. A one (1) week notice is required. • If background material is to be presented to the Councilmembers during a City Council meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the meeting. • Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item(s) on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Community Development counter at City Hall located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253, during normal business hours. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 5 DECEMBER 20, 2016 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2016 A regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at 5:15 p.m. by Mayor Evans. PRESEN i : Councilmembers Franklin, Osborne, Pena, Radi, Mayor Evans ABSENT: None PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilmember Franklin led the audience in the pledge of allegiance. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA City Manager Spevacek requested that (1) Consent Calendar Item Nos. 3 and 4 be removed and rescheduled for December 20, 2016, and (2) Business Session Item Nos. 3 and 4 be taken up for discussion together since they are interrelated. Council concurred. ANNOUNCEMENT 1. RECOGNITION OF LOCAL HERO, ADRIANNA SANCHEZ FOR HER LIFE-SAVING ACTION ON OCTOBER 27, 2016 Mayor Evans and the Council presented Ms. Sanchez with a certificate of recognition for saving a child's life at a local restaurant by performing the Heimlich maneuver. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON AGENDA - None MAYOR EVANS RECESSED THE MEETING TO CITY HALLS ANNUAL OPEN HOUSE MEET AND GREET AT 5:32 P.M. MAYOR EVANS RECONVENED THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 6:37 P.M. PRE-StN 1: CouncilmemDers Pena, Raai, mayor Evans ABSENT: Councilmembers Franklin, Osborne BUSINESS SESSION Items Nos. 1 and 2 regarding the November election results and selection of the 2017 Mayor Pro Tern will be heard later in the meeting in order to give the Riverside County Registrar of Voters time to certify the final ballot count. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 1 DECEMBER 6, 2016 F 3. RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 GENERAL FUND YEAR-END BUDGET REPORT 4. RECEIVE AND FILE COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 Finance Director Campos presented the staff reports on Item Nos. 3 and 4 together, both of which are on file in the Clerk's Office. Councilmembers discussed the employee pension rate and rate of return; the City's proactive approach in Fiscal Year 2011/12 to mitigate rapidly growing pension liability by creating a lower tier for new employees; receipt of first revenue from Measure G expected in June 2017; the great work of Finance Director Rita Conrad, followed by Karla Campos; the auditor's policy of rotating audit team members from year to year; how La Quinta compares to others cities regarding material findings; the effect of property tax relief received by homeowners from the County under Proposition 8, and; the meaning of "continuing appropriations" in the document. Finance Director Campos stated that she will report back regarding the number of homeowners whose property tax relief is expiring, and the effect that will have on property tax revenue projections. MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Radi/Pena to accept Fiscal Year 2015/16 General Fund Year -End Budget Report as submitted. Motion passed: ayes 3, noes 0, absent 2 (Franklin & Osborne absent). MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Radi/Pena to accept The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for Year Ended June 30, 2016 as submitted. Motion passed: ayes 3, noes 0, absent 2 (Franklin and Osborne absent). CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016 2. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 551 ON SECOND READING AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE AND CERTAIN SPECIFIED APPENDICES THEREOF AND MAKING FINDINGS OF LOCAL CONDITIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA WHICH MAKE CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE CALIFORNIA BUILDINGS STANDARDS CODE REASONABLY NECESSARY 3. Item pulled and rescheduled for December 20, 2016 meeting >>> RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FEE REPORT CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 2 DECEMBER 6, 2016 E: 4. Item pulled and rescheduled for December 20, 2016 meeting >>> RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ANNUAL REPORT 5. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED NOVEMBER 11 AND NOVEMBER 18, 2016 6. RECEIVE AND FILE THE FOURTH QUARTER FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 TREASURER'S REPORT FOR JUNE 2016 7. RECEIVE AND FILE THE FIRST QUARTER FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 TREASURER'S REPORT FOR JULY, AUGUST, AND SEPTEMBER 2016 8. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED OCTOBER 31, 2016 9. AUTHORIZE OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR FINANCE DIRECTOR TO ATTEND ANNUAL CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS CONFERENCE IN SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA ON FEBRUARY 7-10, 2017 10. APPROVE DECLARATION OF SURPLUS AND DISPOSAL METHOD OF CITY OWNED VEHICLES 11. APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE CITY HALL MISCELLANEOUS AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Pena/Radi to approve the Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-2 and 5-11 as recommended, with Item No. 2 adopting Ordinance No. 551. Motion passed: ayes 3, noes 0, absent 2 (Franklin and Osborne absent). STUDY SESSION Item No. 1 regarding the Village build -out plan will be heard later in the meeting after Councilmembers-Elect have been sworn in. 0�11K101;*17_\uIQN1QZIQ1k1612t9jIII>1::M9:14/_1NAT/a�ki:1:1411KAIts] ZF1 Planning Manager Perez and Management Specialist Mignogna presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. Councilmembers discussed neighbor notifications; criteria for quick reviews; Director flexibility/discretion for simpler, late applications; multi -year permits; desirability of accommodating legitimate operators; need to balance the needs of the community and necessary transient occupancy tax revenue and job creation, and; revising the CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 3 DECEMBER 6, 2016 4 penalty section to be more stringent, such as restricting events for a year for repeated violations which would not be a problem for events done properly. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Lynne Daniels, Dupont Estate, La Quinta - Ms. Daniels spoke in support of staff's recommendations, especially empowering the Director with some flexibility. PUBLIC SPEAKER: David Toms, La Quinta - Mr. Toms spoke in favor of simplifying the permit process and imposing penalties when violations occur. He said he lives in area of Dupont house and the few events he was aware of have not been a problem. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Dale Ortmann, La Quinta - Mr. Ortmann said he lives closest to the Dupont House residence and enjoys the events and the atmosphere. He noted that the revenue generated by rentals and events is important to the city and agrees that rules should be kept simple and flexibility should be granted to staff. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Melissa Labayog, La Quinta - Ms. Labayog said she lives closest to the Dupont Estate and the quality of life in La Quinta is at issue as well as regulating events to insure safety. She said the matter needs more examination - preferably by committees of neighbors impacted by the events. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Sherry Pena, La Quinta - Ms. Pena suggested that staff preapprove standard tent calculations to save time. She also stated that a requirement to submit applications 45 days before the event date would not work because operators don't always receive bookings that far in advance. She suggests 2-3 weeks. Councilmembers continued their discussion with staff: current one -day turnaround for vendors using preapproved tent models; maximizing turnaround time by getting a range of tent specs from rental companies for preapproval; the need for minimum 45- day review period in order to notice and conduct the required public hearing; conducting information/feedback sessions in impacted neighborhoods, and; making event -related Code changes incrementally. By consensus of the Council, staff was directed to bring recommended changes to the Code back to Council for a vote on December 20, 2016. BUSINESS SESSION - CONTINUED 1. ADOPT A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE OFFICIAL CANVASS OF ELECTION RESULTS FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD NOVEMBER 8, 2016 [RESOLUTION NO. 2016-0461 City Clerk Susan Maysels presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. Ms. Maysels noted that Mayor Linda Evans won with 83.10% of the vote; Councilmember Steve Sanchez won with 24% of the vote; Councilmember Kathleen CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 4 DECEMBER 6, 2016 10 Fitzpatrick won with 22.95% of the vote, and; Measure G passed with 54.73% of the vote. Mayor Evans thanked the voters of La Quinta. MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Radi/Pena to adopt Resolution No. 2016-046 as recommended: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016, DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW Motion passed: ayes 3, noes 0, absent 2 (Franklin & Osborne absent) PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. OATH OF OFFICE ADMINISTERED TO RE-ELECTED MAYOR EVANS AND NEWLY - ELECTED COUNCILMEMBERS FITZPATRICK AND SANCHEZ City Clerk Maysels administered the Oath of Office to Mayor Evans and Councilmembers Fitzpatrick and Sanchez. 2. PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES OF ELECTION TO RE-ELECTED MAYOR EVANS AND NEWLY -ELECTED COUNCILMEMBERS FITZPATRICK AND SANCHEZ City Clerk Maysels presented Certificates of Election to Mayor Evans and Councilmembers Fitzpatrick and Sanchez. FKtJLIV I : Councnmembers ritzpatrick, Pena, Radi, Sanchez, Mayor Evans ABSENT: None BUSINESS SESSION - CONTINUED 2. SELECT MAYOR PRO TEMPORE TO SERVE FOR ONE YEAR City Clerk Susan Maysels presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. MOTION - A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Pena/Fitzpatrick to select Councilmember Radi as Mayor Pro Tem for one year. Motion passed unanimously. STUDY SESSION - CONTINUED 1. DISCUSS THE VILLAGE BUILD -OUT PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ZONING TEXT AMENDMENTS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 5 DECEMBER 6, 2016 11 City Attorney Ihrke explained that three of the five Councilmembers have indicated they may have a conflict of interest on this item, and when this situation arises, the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) has a process set forth in regulation 18705 to randomly select one of the members for "legally required participation" in order to obtain a quorum of at least three members required to conduct City business. Councilmember Radi announced that he may have a conflict of interest due to property owned within 2,500 feet of the project. Councilmember Pena announced that he may have a conflict of interest due to the location of his primary residence within 500' of the project. Councilmember Sanchez announced that as a commercial real estate agent, he may have a conflict of interest due to a property he has listed for sale in the project area. COUNCIL MEMBERS RA DI, PEIVA AND SANCHEZ LEFT THE DAIS AND EXITED THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS. City Clerk Maysels followed the procedure set by FPPC regulation 18705 by putting the names of Councilmembers Radi, Pena and Sanchez in a bowl and having Deputy City Clerk Radeva randomly select one name. Councilmember Pena's name was selected. COUNCILMEMBER PE/VA RETURNED TO THE DAIS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM. Design and Development Director Jonasson, Planning Manager Perez and Terra Nova consultant Crist presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. Councilmembers discussed special event permits in a mixed use development; current average costs of projects for developers; the price to move utility lines underground; City's ability to defray some of the costs; possible use of transportation -related grants; inability to get information and costs from the Imperial Irrigation District in advance of development; waiving Municipal Code requirements for developers to move utilities underground; establishment of a business improvement district, and; 60 foot height allowance. Councilmembers provided the following guidance to staff: • Regarding sidewalks, Councilmember Fitzpatrick said she likes the organic solutions, no standardization as long as the design does not compromise safety or ADA standards. • Regarding a deficiency study, Mayor Evans does not support it. • Regarding height restrictions, Mayor Evans and Councilmembers Fitzpatrick and Pena agreed that 60 feet may work in some areas of the village, but in general, 45 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6 DECEMBER 6, 2016 12 feet is more comfortable overall. This would allow for a 40 foot building with a 5 foot safety rail on the roof. Planning Manager Perez explained that since the EIR studied 60 feet, building height allowances could be increased from 45' to 60' in the future if desired and the CEQA requirements would be done. In response to Councilmember Pena, City Attorney Ihrke said that he will request from the FPPC a formal opinion regarding Councilmembers' possible conflicts of interest on this project. If this item is on an agenda(s) again before the FPPC's official guidance is received, a straw pull will have to occur each time under FPPC "legally required participation" regulations. COUNCILMEMBERS RADI AND SANCHEZ RETURNED TO THE DAIS FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING PUBLIC HEARINGS - None DEPARTMENT REPORTS City Clerk Maysels noted that the voter turnout in Riverside County was 75% of the County's 1,019,130 registered voters. MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBER'S ITEMS Councilmember Radi said the November 20t" Friends of the Desert Mountains clean up event to remove evasive plants was a great effort. He also said that the unsightly but protected dump site high in the cove needs to be disturbed by a bull dozer for a quick clean up and it's done. Lastly, Mr. Radi reported on the success of the 50" anniversary of the Desert Sands Unified School District, and the Old Town Artisan Studio's reception in their new location. Mayor Evans commented on the quality of the tree lighting event and the Blue Light ceremony and expressed her appreciation to staff. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS La Quinta's representative for 2016, Mayor Evans reported on her participation in the following organization's meeting: • CVAG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE La Quinta's representative for 2016, Councilmember Pena reported on his participation in the following organization's meeting: • CVAG VALLEY -WIDE HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE CLOSED SESSION - None CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 7 DECEMBER 6, 2016 13 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Radi/Pena to adjourn at 9:22 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8 DECEMBER 6, 2016 14 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 2 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 20, 2016 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE REVISIONS TO THE CITY'S ARTWORK DONATION POLICY RECOMMENDATION Approve revisions to the City's Artwork Donation Policy. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • In 2008, the City Council approved an art donation policy that accepted art for indoor locations only. • The proposed policy revisions would allow acceptance of art for outdoor locations and possible use of Art in Public Places (APP) funds for site preparation and installation cost. • The Community Services Commission approved these recommendations at the October 10, 2016 meeting. FISCAL IMPACT These revisions may generate site preparation and installation costs, which could range from $25.00 to $5000.00. Funding for potential expenses is available in the Art in Public Places fund. In 2008, the art donation policy was enacted to standardize donations and outline specific qualifications and considerations an artist should consider. These included: • Donated art could only be displayed at City Hall, Wellness Center, Library, or Museum. • The donor would pay all fees to prepare, install and remove the donated art (if necessary). Occasionally, Council has allowed an outdoor placement of donated art. One example is Rosemary Genovese's "Leader of the Pack" sculpture. Rather than have the Council 15 to consider donated outdoor art on a case -by -case basis, staff recommends deleting this restriction. Staff also recommends the use of APP funds to prepare a site for installation. Under Municipal Code 2.65.110 (Art in Public Places Fund) Section B. 1-7, the fund may be used for frames, mats, pedestals, lighting, and other architectural and landscape elements necessary for the proper aesthetic and structural placement. The Community Services Commission reviewed these updates at their October 10, 2016 meeting and unanimously voted to recommend them for Council consideration. Art in public places is an important cultural component of La Quinta. The City's commitment to providing access to public art has amassed a collection of over 100 pieces spread throughout its borders. While 90% of the pieces were either commissioned or purchased via the La Quinta Arts Festival, a small group of the pieces were donated by residents or local artists. The proposed policy provides the City with additional opportunity to enhance the community through art. All art donations are brought to Council for approval. ALTERNATIVES Council may recommend comprehensive changes or not to update the existing policy. Prepared by: Tustin K. Larson, Community Resources Manager Approved by: Chris Escobedo, Community Resources Director Attachment: 1. Artwork Donation Policy redlined `T ATTACHMENT 1 0 a GEM ofxhe DESERT -- ARTWORK DONATION POLICY Dear Art Donor, Thank you for considering the City of La Quinta to donate art work. The City prides itself on enhancing the arts and culture of the community and adding new art pieces for all to enjoy strengthens this goal. Art donations made to the City by local artists, residents, or in memory of loved ones are greatly appreciated by the City Council. Although the City would like to accept all donations provided to them, it is simply not possible. The City has limited space for public display as well as storage capacity. Please consider the following items in contributing to the Art Donation Program: • The donated art work will become property of the City. The City will not be liable for any damages, loss or theft of the art piece once it has been accepted by the City. • The determination for the City Council to accept the artwork will be based on a number of criteria including but not limited to appropriateness of the art, condition of the art, ongoing maintenance, and storage and location availability. • If this is a Memorial Art Donation, the City Council requests a twelve month "waiting period" before considering the art work for donation. The person being memorialized must have been a resident of La Quinta. When an individual or group is interested in making an art donation in a person's memory, the donor(s) must submit a letter to the City Council for consideration. The City Council will consider whether or not to accept the artwork and, if the City Council wishes to accept the artwork, determine a location. • The City will pay for any further restoration, storage and ongoing maintenance and repair. • The decision to accept or deny the art work will be made by the City Council. ARTWORK DONATION POLICY Page 1 of 4 17 • The City will retain the right to terminate the display of the art work. If the City determines to dispose of the artwork, it may do so as it deems appropriate and shall have no obligation to notify the donor of the intended disposition. The Artwork Donation Program is established to enhance the art and culture of residents by placing art in public facilities to be enjoyed by all. .. .... ..... . ... . M 1, .. Please fill out the attached form for donation of art to the City of La Quinta. The City reserves the right to make modifications or alterations to this program as deemed appropriate. For additional information, please contact the Community Services Department at (760) 777-7085. ARTWORK DONATION POLICY Page 2 of 4 18 DONOR INFORMATION Name: Address: City: State: Zip: Telephone: Email: Fax: Preferred Location (Plecise choese iR order of prefereRce)- Information about artwork being donated: Type: Artwork Title: Special care instructi Artist/Owner: Value: Additional Information Needed for Memorial Donations: Name of person being memorialized: Date Deceased: Time frame the person was a City of La Quinta resident: From: To: ARTWORK DONATION POLICY Page 3 of 4 19 Donor's understanding, acceptance, and signature: I, information regarding the City of La Quinta's Artwork Donation Program. I understand, accept, and will comply with all the terms as specified herein, and will not hold the City of La Quinta liable for any damages or theft my donated artwork may suffer while housed in one of the City's facilities. I understand that once the donation is accepted, I no longer have any interest in the artwork, and that the City may dispose of the artwork as it seems fit. Donors Signature: (print name), have read the CITY OF LA QUINTA USE ONLY Date considered by City Council: Approval/Acceptance of artwork: Yes Location approved/determined by City Council: Date of Donation: Estimated Cost of Installation: Payment Received: Residency Requirement M Plaque Ordered: Artwork Delivered & Installed: Plaque Installed: Donor Notified: ARTWORK DONATION POLICY Date: No Page 4of4 20 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 3 City of La Quinta COMMISSION MEETING: December 20, 2016 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE- APPROVE RECIPIENT FOR THE 2017 SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARD RECOMMENDATION Approve Linda Williams as the La Quinta recipient for the 2017 Senior Inspiration Award. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Riverside County's Senior Inspiration Award recognizes and honors outstanding senior citizens for their volunteer involvement. • Each Coachella Valley city nominates a resident. • City staff requested nominations and received eight nominees. • The Community Services Commission reviewed the nominations and recommends Linda Williams. FISCAL IMPACT - None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Every year the County of Riverside and Coachella Valley cities each select a senior citizen, 65 or older, who best demonstrates "a zest for the physical and mental well-being through volunteerism and active engagement in the community." Staff solicited nominations (Attachment 1) from: Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce, La Quinta Historical Society, La Quinta Rotary Club, Friends of the La Quinta Library, La Quinta Arts Foundation, La Quinta Cove Neighborhood Association, Friends of the Desert Mountains, Trilogy, Desert Classic Charities, Riverside County Sheriff (La Quinta Police), Riverside County Fire, La Quinta Library and La Quinta Museum. The following nominations were received: • La Quinta Police - Mr. Bruce Armstrong • Friends of the Desert Mountains & Living Desert - Mr. Bill Baker • La Quinta Resident - Pat Clapp • Riverside County Fire - Ms. Judith Hoffman • Desert Classic Charities - Ray Leonard • La Quinta Police - James Mannix • Trilogy La Quinta - Robert Rose • La Quinta Historical Society - Linda Williams 21 Only one nomination can be submitted from each Coachella Valley city. All eight nominees meet the award criteria. The Community Services Commission reviewed the nominations and unanimously recommended Linda Williams for the 2017 Senior Inspiration Award recipient. Attachments 2-4 provide biographical summaries of the eight nominees. Linda Williams has been an active community member since moving to La Quinta in 2003. Linda is on the La Quinta Historical Society board serving as president for the past nine years. She is a Certified Emergency Response Team volunteer, a member of the Cove Neighborhood Association steering committee, a member of the Stewards of the Fred Wolff Nature Preserve, Co-chairman of the Windermere Community Service event, and a member of the Historic Preservation Commission. The award will be presented at the Senior Inspiration Awards luncheon held on Friday, March 24, 2017 at the JW Marriot Desert Springs in Palm Desert. ALTERNATIVES Ms. Williams meets the criteria for the recipient of the 2017 Senior Inspiration Award Program. Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Christina Calderon, Community Programs and Wellness Supervisor Approved by: Chris Escobedo, Community Resources Director ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter requesting nominations 2. Nomination forms with biographical information on all eight nominees 22 c I OF September 14, 2016 Dear, Thank you for your continued support and involvement with the City of La Quinta. It's that time of year again, where we have the opportunity to recognize our senior residents who have gone above and beyond for our community. We're seeking your assistance for nominations from La Quinta for the Senior Inspiration Awards. Since 1992, the County of Riverside and the nine incorporated cities of the Coachella Valley have sponsored the annual Senior Inspiration Awards. Each city selects one recipient annually as their outstanding senior for this event. This year the event will be held on Friday, March 24, 2017 at the JW Marriott Desert Springs in Palm Desert. Please submit one or more names, along with a brief summary (maximum 150 words) on why you chose that person. The following is the criteria: The honoree should be at least 65 years old or older; Reside in La Quinta; Be actively involved in community affairs; Deserves to receive recognition and/or may not otherwise receive recognition for their service to the community; and Personifies a healthy, active and contributing attitude and lifestyle. Nomination forms are enclosed for your selections. Please complete one or more and return to Christina Calderon at the La Quinta Wellness Center, 78-450 Avenida La Fonda, La Quinta, CA 92253 no later than September 30, 2016. Our deadline is needed to ensure the nominees are reviewed by our Community Services Commission with recommendations to follow to the La Quinta City Council. Also enclosed is a list of our previous honorees. I'm so proud of the contributions our residents make to the community. Let's continue to highlight and recognize the great work being done by our La Quinta seniors. Thank you! Sincerely, LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta Enclosures cc: City Council Chris Escobedo, Community Resources Director Christina Calderon, Community Programs & Wellness Supervisor 78-495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta I California 92253 1 760.777.7000 1 www.La-Quinta.org 23 24 Riverside County Supervisor John J. Benoit presents y, -/.,� 25T" ANNUAL 7� SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARDS Friday, March 24, 2017 The Senior Inspiration Awards is a beloved event in its 25th year. Every year, the County of Riverside and the Coachella Valley's nine cities honor senior citizens 65 years of age and older who inspire others through their volunteerism and active engagement in the community. This annual event honors these unsung heroes for their ongoing contribution and dedication to our communities. If you would like to nominate someone for this honor, please complete this form and return to Christina Calderon, Community Programs & Wellness Supervisor, via email at ccalderon@la-quinta.org or by mail at 78450 Avenida La Fonda, La Quinta, CA 92253. Official Nomination Form Deadline: Friday, September 30, 2016 Eligible recipients must: -Be at least 65 years old -Reside and/or volunteer in nominating city -Be actively involved in community affairs for a lengthy period of time -Deserve to receive recognition and/or may not otherwise receive recognition for his or her service to the community -Personify a healthy, active, and contributing attitude and lifestyle Nominee Name of Nominee Bruce Armstrong Mailing Address 81-120 Legends Way, La Quinta CA 92253 Email Organization Individual Volunteers With Nominator La Quinta Police - Office Name of Nominator Candelaria Munoz Organization La Quinta Police Phone Phone Email Reason for Nomination Bruce has been a volunteer with La Quinta Police since October 25, 2010. 1 can always count on Bruce to show up and cover his shift. He knows how to help people when they come to the substation and give them proper instructions to help their situation. When Bruce is working I know I don't have to worry about the substation, I know he has it under control. 25 26 Riverside County Supervisor John J. Benoit presents 7 Z 2 5TH AN N UAL SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARDS Friday, March 24, 2017 The Senior Inspiration Awards is a beloved event in its 25th year. Every year, the County of Riverside and the Coachella Valley's nine cities honor senior citizens 65 years of age and older who inspire others through their volunteerism and active engagement in the community. This annual event honors these unsung heroes for their ongoing contribution and dedication to our communities. If you would like to nominate someone for this honor, please complete this form and return to Christina Calderon, Community Programs & Wellness Supervisor, via email at ccalderon@la-quinta.org or by mail at 78450 Avenida La Fonda, La Quinta, CA 92253. Official Nomination Form Deadline: Friday, September 30, 2016 Eligible recipients must: -Be at least 65 years old -Reside and/or volunteer in nominating city -Be actively involved in community affairs for a lengthy period of time -Deserve to receive recognition and/or may not otherwise receive recognition for his or her service to the community -Personify a healthy, active, and contributing attitude and lifestyle Nominee Name of Nominee Bill Baker Mailing Address 79674 Liga La Quinta, Ca 92253 Email Phone Organization(s) Individual Volunteers With The Living Desert & Friends of the Desert Moutains Nominator Name of Nominator Organization Li Nominator Justin Carmichael Desert Zoo Phone Email Name of Nominator Tammy Martin Phone Organization Friends of the Desert Mountains Email Reason for Nomination Bill has been a volunteer for about 3 years with The Living Desert. He has 1,633 hours as a volunteer and is very active in many areas of the zoo. Bill also leads hikes and tours for The Living Desert. See attachment from the Friends of the Desert Mountains. 27 28 Nomination form the 2S h Annual Senior Inspiration, Award — City of LaQuinta Since Bill Baker became a volunteer with Friends of the Desert Mountains in 2010, he has given over 3,500 hours of his time leading interpretive hikes, rebuilding trails, removing graffiti, clearing litter, controlling invasive weeds, gathering data on pinyon pines and yellow bats, and by greeting visitors to our Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Visitor Center. Bill is passionate about the desert and goes above and beyond to get the job done. He has given multiple presentations on the natural and cultural history of the Coachella Valley. If you want to know something about the desert, just ask Bill If he doesn't have the answer, he will happily get it for you. As a resident of La Quinta, Bill is very active in keeping the city's trails clean and safe for hikers. He wants to make everyone's experience of visiting the La Quinta Cove a safe and pleasurable one. Because of the work that he has done and continues to do for our valley, especially in La Quinta, he truly is an inspiration to us all, I highly recommend Bill Baker for the City of La Quinta's Senior Inspiration award. 29 30 Riverside County Supervisor John J. Benoit presents 7 Z 2 5TH AN N UAL SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARDS Friday, March 24, 2017 The Senior Inspiration Awards is a beloved event in its 25th year. Every year, the County of Riverside and the Coachella Valley's nine cities honor senior citizens 65 years of age and older who inspire others through their volunteerism and active engagement in the community. This annual event honors these unsung heroes for their ongoing contribution and dedication to our communities. If you would like to nominate someone for this honor, please complete this form and return to Christina Calderon, Community Programs & Wellness Supervisor, via email at ccalderon@la-quinta.org or by mail at 78450 Avenida La Fonda, La Quinta, CA 92253. Official Nomination Form Deadline: Friday, September 30, 2016 Eligible recipients must: -Be at least 65 years old -Reside and/or volunteer in nominating city -Be actively involved in community affairs for a lengthy period of time -Deserve to receive recognition and/or may not otherwise receive recognition for his or her service to the community -Personify a healthy, active, and contributing attitude and lifestyle Nominee Name of Nominee Patricia "Pat" Mailing Address Email 76718 Florida Ave Palm Desert, CA 92211 Organization Individual Volunteers With Nominator Name of Nominator Dori Quill Organization La Quinta Resident Phone La Quinta Wellness Center (formerly La Quinta Senior Center) Email Phone Reason for Nomination Pat has volunteered at the Wellness Center (La Quinta Senior Center) for over 10 years. She helps with the senior luncheons, exercise classes and the weekly free bread distribution . Until recently she was there three times per week making people laugh and greeting everyone. She also volunteers with children at the Barbara Sinatra Center for abused children and other organizations. At 80 years old she has been a big inspiration to me in how to spend your golden years. Pat has also volunteered at the 1984 U.S. Summer Olympic Games; spent 10 years volunteerin with the American Cancer Society in the Los Angeles area; and is one of the founding members of the Culver City Historical Society. 31 32 Riverside County Supervisor John J. Benoit presents 7 Z 2 5TH AN N UAL SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARDS Friday, March 24, 2017 The Senior Inspiration Awards is a beloved event in its 25th year. Every year, the County of Riverside and the Coachella Valley's nine cities honor senior citizens 65 years of age and older who inspire others through their volunteerism and active engagement in the community. This annual event honors these unsung heroes for their ongoing contribution and dedication to our communities. If you would like to nominate someone for this honor, please complete this form and return to Christina Calderon, Community Programs & Wellness Supervisor, via email at ccalderon@la-quinta.org or by mail at 78450 Avenida La Fonda, La Quinta, CA 92253. Official Nomination Form Deadline: Friday, September 30, 2016 Eligible recipients must: -Be at least 65 years old -Reside and/or volunteer in nominating city -Be actively involved in community affairs for a lengthy period of time -Deserve to receive recognition and/or may not otherwise receive recognition for his or her service to the community -Personify a healthy, active, and contributing attitude and lifestyle Nominee Name of Nominee Judith Hoffman Mailing Address Email 53040 Avenida Diaz La Quinta, CA Organization Individual Volunteers With Nominator Name of Nominator Dave LaClair Organization Riverside County Fire Reason for Nomination Phone Fire CERT and Sheriff Officer Volunteer Phone Email Judy has been a voluteer with the Riverside County Sheriff (La Quinta Police) since June 2015. She is also a volutneer with CERT (Community Emergency Response Team) for La Quinta. Judy is one of the most active members of the police volunteers. Every Tuesday morning she starts her day with a smile and makes everyone feel at ease. Since volunteering over a year with the police she has trained three new volunteers on the front desk duties and is the "go to" person whenever someone has a question. Judy also provides delicious baked treats that the police and city staff enjoy. 33 34 Riverside County Supervisor John J. Benoit presents 7 Z 2 5TH AN N UAL SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARDS Friday, March 24, 2017 The Senior Inspiration Awards is a beloved event in its 25th year. Every year, the County of Riverside and the Coachella Valley's nine cities honor senior citizens 65 years of age and older who inspire others through their volunteerism and active engagement in the community. This annual event honors these unsung heroes for their ongoing contribution and dedication to our communities. If you would like to nominate someone for this honor, please complete this form and return to Christina Calderon, Community Programs & Wellness Supervisor, via email at ccalderon@la-quinta.org or by mail at 78450 Avenida La Fonda, La Quinta, CA 92253. Official Nomination Form Deadline: Friday, September 30, 2016 Eligible recipients must: -Be at least 65 years old -Reside and/or volunteer in nominating city -Be actively involved in community affairs for a lengthy period of time -Deserve to receive recognition and/or may not otherwise receive recognition for his or her service to the community -Personify a healthy, active, and contributing attitude and lifestyle Nominee Name of Nominee Ray Leonard Mailing Address Email 55727 Brae Burn Organization Individual Volunteers With Nominator Phone La Quinta, CA Career Builder Challenge/ Desert Classic Charities Name of Nominator Kristi Hanousek Organization Career Builder Challenge Tournament Services Manager Reason for Nomination Email Phone Ray has volunteered for this tournament for over 10 years. His contribiutions to the tournament and Desert Class Charities are endless. Ray's involvement is not jsut for the one week of the tournament, he works tirelessly all year long and expects nothing in return other than the satisfaction of helping those in need. Ray inspires others to get involved and help their community. He engages all those he meets to join the challenge which benefits approximately 40 local charities. As Ray would say, "There is no greater feeling than helping others in your community." He is not afraid of hard work, cares about others on his team, and goes above and beyond to help giA 35 36 Riverside County Supervisor John J. Benoit presents y, -/.,� 25T" ANNUAL 7� SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARDS Friday, March 24, 2017 The Senior Inspiration Awards is a beloved event in its 25th year. Every year, the County of Riverside and the Coachella Valley's nine cities honor senior citizens 65 years of age and older who inspire others through their volunteerism and active engagement in the community. This annual event honors these unsung heroes for their ongoing contribution and dedication to our communities. If you would like to nominate someone for this honor, please complete this form and return to Christina Calderon, Community Programs & Wellness Supervisor, via email at ccalderon@la-quinta.org or by mail at 78450 Avenida La Fonda, La Quinta, CA 92253. Official Nomination Form Deadline: Friday, September 30, 2016 Eligible recipients must: -Be at least 65 years old -Reside and/or volunteer in nominating city -Be actively involved in community affairs for a lengthy period of time -Deserve to receive recognition and/or may not otherwise receive recognition for his or her service to the community -Personify a healthy, active, and contributing attitude and lifestyle Nominee Name of Nominee James Mannix Mailing Address 56765 Village Drive, La Quinta CA 92253 Phone Email Organization Individual Volunteers With Citizen's On Patrol (C.0.P.) Nominator Name of Nominator CSO II Aaron Aceves Phone Organization Riverside County Sheriff Department Email Reason for Nomination Mannix has been with the C.O.P. program since 07/2007, performing various duties with pride and professionalism. Mannix, time and time again, continues to devote his time for numerous city and school events. His assistance with sworn personnel allows the citizens of La Quinta more availability to respond to emergency calls. Mannix is exemplary in his duties as a C.O.P. Volunteer, and is highly valued by the La Quinta Police Department. 37 38 Riverside County Supervisor John J. Benoit presents y, -/.,� 25T" ANNUAL 7� SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARDS Friday, March 24, 2017 The Senior Inspiration Awards is a beloved event in its 25th year. Every year, the County of Riverside and the Coachella Valley's nine cities honor senior citizens 65 years of age and older who inspire others through their volunteerism and active engagement in the community. This annual event honors these unsung heroes for their ongoing contribution and dedication to our communities. If you would like to nominate someone for this honor, please complete this form and return to Christina Calderon, Community Programs & Wellness Supervisor, via email at ccalderon@la-quinta.org or by mail at 78450 Avenida La Fonda, La Quinta, CA 92253. Official Nomination Form Deadline: Friday, September 30, 2016 Eligible recipients must: -Be at least 65 years old -Reside and/or volunteer in nominating city -Be actively involved in community affairs for a lengthy period of time -Deserve to receive recognition and/or may not otherwise receive recognition for his or her service to the community -Personify a healthy, active, and contributing attitude and lifestyle Nominee Name of Nominee Robert Rose Phone 1 Mailing Address 81785 Golden Star Way La Quinta, CA 92253 Email Organization Individual Volunteers With Nominator Name of Nominator Eric Angle Trilogy at La Quinta Community Services Organization Organization Trilogy of La Quinta Maintenance Association Reason for Nomination See Attached. Phone Email 39 40 To: Christina Calderon, City of La Quinta From: Eric Angle, General Manager Trilogy at La Quinta Maintenance Association Re: Robert Rose, Nominee 2016 Senior Inspirations Award Robert "Bob" Rose is a long time resident of Trilogy in La Quinta. He has been in the community for the past seven years, relocating from Granada Hills/Porter Ranch area, after retiring as CEO of Co-op Network, a national ATM and Point of Sale network, serving the financial credit union industry, which employed more than 500 employees nationally. During his career, Bob also had extensive experience running 501(c) corporations, as well as being CEO of a substantially large Los Angeles based Credit Union. Bob has served as a volunteer the past 4 years as President of the Trilogy at La Quinta Community Services Organization (TLQS). TLQS is a Not for Profit Mutual Benefit Corporation under IRS Code Section 501(c) (4). The purpose of TLQS is to promote social welfare for the common good of the community it serves. TLQS is funded by Community Enhancement fees collected upon the close of escrow of every home sale in Trilogy at La Quinta. With Bob's leadership and guidance, TLQS has undertaken many large-scale projects, including the addition of lights to the palm trees along the Avenue 60 corridor between Madison and Monroe Streets to improve public safety and the aesthetics of the surrounding area. TLQS makes annual contributions of nearly $100,000 to support the following organizations: American Cancer Society Boys and Girls Club of the Coachella Valley Coachella Valley High School Programs Riverside County Fire Department Programs TLQS has also approved grant requests from several other organizations, including: La Quinta Policy Department, Citizens on Patrol, purchasing a new patrol vehicle Coachella Valley Volunteers in Medicine, contributing supplies and marketing material Martha's Village & Kitchen Oncology Nurses USO - Bob Hope TLQMA annual health and wellness fairs First Book San Jose Learning Center CV Rescue Mission Along with spearheading all these great initiatives for the community through TLQS, Bob served as a mentor for junior achievement, and as Ambassador to the Children's Miracle Network. While CEO of Co-op Network, Bob developed and executed a plan whereby every participating credit union within the network, made a donation for each and every financial transaction in the national network, raising hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars to treat very sick children across the country; providing state-of-the-art medical care, free of charge, as well as housing for their families where treatment was being given. Bob is an avid golfer at Trilogy at La Quinta, and enjoys all the social events offered at Trilogy. 41 42 Riverside County Supervisor John J. Benoit presents 7 Z 2 5TH AN N UAL SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARDS Friday, March 24, 2017 The Senior Inspiration Awards is a beloved event in its 25th year. Every year, the County of Riverside and the Coachella Valley's nine cities honor senior citizens 65 years of age and older who inspire others through their volunteerism and active engagement in the community. This annual event honors these unsung heroes for their ongoing contribution and dedication to our communities. If you would like to nominate someone for this honor, please complete this form and return to Christina Calderon, Community Programs & Wellness Supervisor, via email at ccalderon@la-quinta.org or by mail at 78450 Avenida La Fonda, La Quinta, CA 92253. Official Nomination Form Deadline: Friday, September 30, 2016 Eligible recipients must: -Be at least 65 years old -Reside and/or volunteer in nominating city -Be actively involved in community affairs for a lengthy period of time -Deserve to receive recognition and/or may not otherwise receive recognition for his or her service to the community -Personify a healthy, active, and contributing attitude and lifestyle Nominee Name of Nominee Linda Williams Mailing Address Email Phone P.O. Box 1062 La Quinta, CA 92247 52519 Juarez La Quinta, CA 92253 Organization Individual Volunteers With Nominator La Quinta Historical Society/ La Quinta Cove Neighborhood Association Name of Nominator Nancy Salvatierra, La Quinta Board of Directors Phone Organization La Quinta Historical Society Email Reason for Nomination The Board of La Quinta Historical Society is honored to nominate Linda Williams for the 2016 Senior Inspiratiol Award. Volunteerism is at the core of Linda's being and her positive, energetic, "can do" attitude is an inspiration to all who know her. Since moving to the Cove in 2003, Linda has served our community in the following was: Member of LQHS Board (President past 9 years); C.E.R.T. (Community Emergency Respons Team) training; Member of the Cove Neighborhood Association Steering Committee; Member of the Stewards of the Fred Wolff Nature Preserve; Co -Chairman of the Windemere Community Service Event; and Member of the Historical Preservation Commission as well as continuous participation in numerous civic events and projects. Linda Williams is a tireless leader who has often served in the capacity of liaison between various community organizations. But most of all, she is respected and well liked - a deserving participant. 43 44 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO.4 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 20, 2016 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT A RESOLUTION CONSENTING TO INCLUDE PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY'S JURISDICTION IN THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY AND OPEN A PROPERTY ASSESSED CLEAN ENERGY PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION Adopt a Resolution consenting to include properties within the City's jurisdiction in the California Municipal Finance Authority and open a Property Assessed Clean Energy Program. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • On December 1, 2008, the State of California established the Property Assessed Clean Energy Program (PACE) program to allow property owners financing or refinancing of renewable energy, water and energy efficient upgrades and other improvements to residential and commercial buildings. • The California Municipal Finance Authority (CMFA) PACE participants repay the loans over time through a voluntary contractual assessment collected through property taxes. • On January 25, 2016, Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) approved implementation of PACE programs and encouraged Coachella Valley cities to participate. • CMFA is a PACE provider and before the program can be implemented, it must be adopted by City Council resolution. FISCAL IMPACT - None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The CMFA is a joint powers authority formed to assist local governments, non-profit organizations, and businesses by promoting economic, cultural, and community development, with financing of economic development and charitable activities throughout California. As part of its economic and community development, the CMFA is offering PACE financing for residential and commercial property owners. ALTERNATIVES As the CMFA program would benefit City residents, staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Gil Villalpando, Management Specialist Approved by: Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager 45 46 RESOLUTION NO. 2016 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO THE INCLUSION OF PROPERTIES WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF THE CITY IN THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY OPEN PACE PROGRAMS; AUTHORIZING THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT APPLICATIONS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS, CONDUCT CONTRACTUAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS AND LEVY CONTRACTUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF THE CITY; AND AUTHORIZING RELATED ACTIONS WHEREAS, the California Municipal Finance Authority (the "Authority") is a joint exercise of powers authority, the members of which include numerous cities and counties in the State of California, including the City of La Quinta (the "City); and WHEREAS, the Authority is implementing Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) programs, which it has designated CMFA Open PACE, consisting of CMFA Open PACE programs each administered by a separate program administrator (collectively with any successors, assigns, replacements or additions, the "Programs"), to allow the financing or refinancing of renewable energy, energy efficiency, water efficiency and seismic strengthening improvements, electric vehicle charging infrastructure and such other improvements, infrastructure or other work as may be authorized by law from time to time (collectively, the "Improvements") through the levy of contractual assessments pursuant to Chapter 29 of Division 7 of the Streets & Highways Code ("Chapter 29") within counties and cities throughout the State of California that consent to the inclusion of properties within their respective territories in the Programs and the issuance of bonds from time to time; and WHEREAS, the program administrators currently active in administering Programs are Energy Efficient Equity, Inc.; BlueFlame PACE Services LLC; OnPACE Energy Solutions, LLC; and Structured Finance Associates, LLC; and the Authority will notify the City in advance of any additions or changes; and WHEREAS, Chapter 29 provides that assessments may be levied under its provisions only with the free and willing consent of the owner or owners of each lot or parcel on which an assessment is levied at the time the assessment is levied; and WHEREAS, the City desires to allow the owners of property ("Participating Property Owners") within its territory to participate in the Programs and to allow the Authority to conduct assessment proceedings under Chapter 29 within its territory and to issue bonds to finance or refinance Improvements; and 47 Resolution No. 2016- PACE Adopted: December 20, 2016 Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS, the territory within which assessments may be levied for the Programs shall include all of the territory within the City's official boundaries; and WHEREAS, the Authority will conduct all assessment proceedings under Chapter 29 for the Programs and issue any bonds issued in connection with the Programs; and WHEREAS, the City will not be responsible for the conduct of any assessment proceedings; the levy of assessments; any required remedial action in the case of delinquencies in such assessment payments; or the issuance, sale, administration repayment or guarantee of any bonds issued in connection with the Programs; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. This City Council hereby finds and declares that the foregoing recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2. This City Council hereby finds and declares that properties in the territory of the City will benefit from the availability of the Programs within the territory of the City and, pursuant thereto, the conduct of special assessment proceedings by the Authority pursuant to Chapter 29 and the issuance of bonds to finance or refinance Improvements. SECTION 3. In connection with the Programs, the City hereby consents to the conduct of special assessment proceedings by the Authority pursuant to Chapter 29 on any property within the territory of the City and the issuance of bonds to finance or refinance Improvements; provided, that (1) The Participating Property Owners, who shall be the legal owners of such property, execute a contract pursuant to Chapter 29 and comply with other applicable provisions of California law in order to accomplish the valid levy of assessments; and (2) The City will not be responsible for the conduct of any assessment proceedings; the levy of assessments; any required remedial action in the case of delinquencies in such assessment payments; or the issuance, sale, administration, repayment or guarantee of any bonds issued in connection with the Programs. SECTION 4. The appropriate officials and staff of the City are hereby authorized and directed to make applications for the Programs available to all property owners who wish to finance or refinance Improvements; provided, that the Authority shall be responsible for providing such applications and related materials at its own expense. A chosen staff member by the Mayor or City Manager of the City from time to time, can 48 Resolution No. 2016- PACE Adopted: December 20, 2016 Page 3 of 4 be designated as the contact person for the Authority in connection with the Programs. SECTION 5. The appropriate officials and staff of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver such certificates, requisitions, agreements and related documents as are reasonably required by the Authority to implement the Programs. SECTION 6. The City Council hereby finds that adoption of this Resolution is not a "project" under the California Environmental Quality Act, because the Resolution does not involve any commitment to a specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, as contemplated by Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section 15378(b)(4)). SECTION 7. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the Financial Advisor of the Authority at: California Municipal Finance Authority, 2111 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 320, Carlsbad, California 92011, Attn: Travis Cooper. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 201h day of December, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 49 Resolution No. 2016- PACE Adopted: December 20, 2016 Page 4 of 4 ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 50 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 5 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 20, 2016 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS (1) APPROVING TWO AGREEMENTS WITH THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION TO PREPARE FOR AND TO ADMINISTER THE VOTER -APPROVED ONE PERCENT (1%) TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX, AND (2) SETTING FORTH THE EMPLOYEE POSITIONS AUTHORIZED TO EXAMINE TAX RECORDS RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 2016- approving two agreements with the State Board of Equalization to implement the voter -approved one percent (1%) City Transactions and Use Tax. Adopt Resolution No. 2016- authorizing the examination of Transactions (sales) and Use Tax records by certain City employees. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Measure G, the one percent (1%) Transactions and Use Tax measure was approved by voters at the November 8, 2016 General Election. • The State Board of Equalization (BOE) will administer the additional one percent (1%) tax by collecting it from City businesses and distributing that revenue to the City quarterly. • The BOE-required resolutions and agreements governing its administration of the tax are attached for review and approval. FISCAL IMPACT The BOE will charge up to $175,000 to cover its preparatory costs, and once the tax becomes operative on April 1, 2017, the fee charged by the BOE for administration shall be deducted from the taxes collected and shall be an amount as provided by law and calculated as set forth in Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7273 (Attachment 1). Preparatory costs and additional sales tax revenue will be recorded in the General Fund. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 540 on May 17, 2016 imposing a Transactions and Use Tax if approved by a simple majority of voters during the November 8, 2016 election. Ordinance No. 540 was assigned the Measure letter "G" and was passed by the voters 8,233-yes to 6,809-no. 51 Ordinance No. 540, section 3.27.040 states that "the City shall contract with the State Board of Equalization to perform all functions incident to the administration and operation of this transactions and use tax ordinance..." The BOE requires the adoption and execution of the following attached documents prior to implementation of the new tax: 1. A resolution approving: (a) Agreement for Preparation to Administer and Operate City's Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance, which includes developing procedures, programming for data processing, developing and adopting regulations, designing and printing forms, developing instruction for staff and taxpayers, and other necessary preparatory costs to administer the City's 1% tax for a fee not to exceed $175,000; (b) Agreement for State Administration of City Transactions and Use Taxes, which sets forth the provisions for the BOE to perform exclusively all functions incident to the administration and operation of La Quinta Ordinance No. 540 effective April 1, 2017, and renewed automatically from year to year. The State will deduct from the taxes due to La Quinta, "such amounts as is provided for by law." Such amounts vary depending on La Quinta's proportionate share of tax revenue and the BOE costs for administration; and (c) Authorizing the City Manager to execute both agreements. 2. A resolution listing the City employee positions authorized to examine the City's Transactions and Use Tax records. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are recommended as the tax measure was approved by voters and only the BOE may administer the tax. Prepared by: Susan Maysels, City Clerk Approved by: Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager Attachment 1: California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7273 52 RESOLUTION NO. 2016 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENTS WITH THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENTS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF A LOCAL TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX WHEREAS, on May 17, 2016 the City Council approved Ordinance No 540 amending the La Quinta Municipal Code and providing for a local transactions and use tax; and WHEREAS, the State Board of Equalization (Board) administers and collects the transactions and use taxes for all applicable jurisdictions within the state; and WHEREAS, the Board will be responsible to administer and collect the transactions and use tax for the City; and WHEREAS, the Board requires that the City enter into a "Preparatory Agreement" and an "Administration Agreement" prior to implementation of said taxes; and WHEREAS, the Board requires that the City Council authorize the agreements, and designate the position authorized to execute agreements on behalf of the City, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. The "Preparatory Agreement" attached as Exhibit A and the "Administrative Agreement" attached as Exhibit B are hereby approved. SECTION 2. The City Manager of the City of La Quinta is hereby authorized to execute each agreement. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 201" day of December, 2016 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 53 Resolution No. 2016- 60E Agreements to Implement 1% Tax (Measure G) Adopted: December 20, 2016 Page 2 of 2 LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 54 AGREEMENT FOR PREPARATION TO ADMINISTER AND OPERATE CITY'S TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX ORDINANCE In order to prepare to administer a transactions and use tax ordinance adopted in accordance with the provision of Part 1.6 (commencing with Section 7251) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the City of LA QUINTA , hereinafter called City, and the STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, hereinafter called Board, do agree as follows: 1. The Board agrees to enter into work to prepare to administer and operate a transactions and use tax in conformity with Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which has been approved by a majority of the electors of the City and whose ordinance has been adopted by the City. 2. City agrees to pay to the Board at the times and in the amounts hereinafter specified all of the Board's costs for preparatory work necessary to administer the City's transactions and use tax ordinance. The Board's costs for preparatory work include costs of developing procedures, programming for data processing, developing and adopting appropriate regulations, designing and printing forms, developing instructions for the Board's staff and for taxpayers, and other appropriate and necessary preparatory costs to administer a transactions and use tax ordinance. These costs shall include both direct and indirect costs as specified in Section 11256 of the Government Code. 3. Preparatory costs may be accounted for in a manner which conforms to the internal accounting and personnel records currently maintained by the Board. The billings for costs may be presented in summary form. Detailed records of preparatory costs will be retained for audit and verification by the City. 4. Any dispute as to the amount of preparatory costs incurred by the Board shall be referred to the State Director of Finance for resolution, and the Director's decision shall be final. 5. Preparatory costs incurred by the Board shall be billed by the Board periodically, with the final billing within a reasonable time after the operative date of the ordinance. City shall pay to the Board the amount of such costs on or before the last day of the next succeeding month following the month when the billing is received. 6. The amount to be paid by City for the Board's preparatory costs shall not exceed one hundred seventy-five thousand dollars ($175,000) (Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7272.) 1 55 7. Communications and notices may be sent by first class United States mail. Communications and notices to be sent to the Board shall be addressed to: State Board of Equalization P.O. Box 942879, MIC: 27 Sacramento, California 94279-0027 Attention: Administrator, Local Revenue Branch Communications and notices to be sent to City shall be addressed to: CITY CLERK CITY HALL, 78495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QU I NTA, CA 922532 8. The date of this agreement is the date on which it is approved by the Department of General Services. This agreement shall continue in effect until the preparatory work necessary to administer City's transactions and use tax ordinance has been completed and the Board has received all payments due from City under the terms of this agreement. CITY OF LA Q U I N TA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION By (Signature) Administrator FRANK J. SPEVACEK (Typed Name) CITY MANAGER (Title) (Rev. 11/16) 2 56 AGREEMENT FOR STATE ADMINISTRATION OF CITY TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAXES The City Council of the City of LAQUINTA has adopted, and the voters of the City of LA QUINTA (hereafter called "City" or "District") have approved by the required majority vote, the City of LA QUINTA'S Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance (hereafter called "Ordinance"), a copy of which is attached hereto. To carry out the provisions of Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code and the Ordinance, the State Board of Equalization, (hereinafter called the "Board") and the City do agree as follows: ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Unless the context requires otherwise, wherever the following terms appear in the Agreement, they shall be interpreted to mean the following: 1. "District taxes" shall mean the transactions and use taxes, penalties, and interest imposed under an ordinance specifically authorized by Revenue and Taxation code Section 7285.9 , and in compliance with Part 1.6, Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. 2. "City Ordinance" shall mean the City's Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance referred to above and attached hereto, Ordinance No. 540 as amended from time to time, or as deemed to be amended from time to time pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7262.2. ARTICLE II ADMINISTRATION AND COLLECTION OF CITY TAXES A. Administration. The Board and City agree that the Board shall perform exclusively all functions incident to the administration and operation of the City Ordinance. 57 B. Other Applicable Laws. City agrees that all provisions of law applicable to the administration and operation of the State Sales and Use Tax Law which are not inconsistent with Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code shall be applicable to the administration and operation of the City Ordinance. City agrees that money collected pursuant to the City Ordinance may be deposited into the State Treasury to the credit of the Retail Sales Tax Fund and may be drawn from that Fund for any authorized purpose, including making refunds, compensating and reimbursing the Board pursuant to Article IV of this Agreement, and transmitting to City the amount to which City is entitled. C. Transmittal of money. 1. For the period during which the tax is in effect, and except as otherwise provided herein, all district taxes collected under the provisions of the City Ordinance shall be transmitted to City periodically as promptly as feasible, but not less often than twice in each calendar quarter. 2. For periods subsequent to the expiration date of the tax whether by City's self-imposed limits or by final judgment of any court of the State of California holding that City's ordinance is invalid or void, all district taxes collected under the provisions of the City Ordinance shall be transmitted to City not less than once in each calendar quarter. 3. Transmittals may be made by mail or electronic funds transfer to an account of the City designated and authorized by the City. A statement shall be furnished at least quarterly indicating the amounts withheld pursuant to Article IV of this Agreement. D. Rules. The Board shall prescribe and adopt such rules and regulations as in its judgment are necessary or desirable for the administration and operation of the City Ordinance and the distribution of the district taxes collected thereunder. E. Preference. Unless the payor instructs otherwise, and except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the Board shall give no preference in applying money received for state sales and use taxes, state -administered local sales and use taxes, and district transactions and use taxes owed by a taxpayer, but shall apply moneys collected to the satisfaction of the claims of the State, cities, counties, cities and counties, redevelopment agencies, other districts, and City as their interests appear. (Rev.11-16) 2 58 F. Security. The Board agrees that any security which it hereafter requires to be furnished by taxpayers under the State Sales and Use Tax Law will be upon such terms that it also will be available for the payment of the claims of City for district taxes owing to it as its interest appears. The Board shall not be required to change the terms of any security now held by it, and City shall not participate in any security now held by the Board. G. Records of the Board. When requested by resolution of the legislative body of the City under section 7056 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the Board agrees to permit authorized personnel of the City to examine the records of the Board, including the name, address, and account number of each seller holding a seller's permit with a registered business location in the City, pertaining to the ascertainment of transactions and use taxes collected for the City. Information obtained by the City from examination of the Board's records shall be used by the City only for purposes related to the collection of transactions and use taxes by the Board pursuant to this Agreement. H. Annexation. City agrees that the Board shall not be required to give effect to an annexation, for the purpose of collecting, allocating, and distributing District transactions and use taxes, earlier than the first day of the calendar quarter which commences not less than two months after notice to the Board. The notice shall include the name of the county or counties annexed to the extended City boundary. In the event the City shall annex an area, the boundaries of which are not coterminous with a county or counties, the notice shall include a description of the area annexed and two maps of the City showing the area annexed and the location address of the property nearest to the extended City boundary on each side of every street or road crossing the boundary. ARTICLE III ALLOCATION OF TAX A. Allocation. In the administration of the Board's contracts with all districts that impose transactions and use taxes imposed under ordinances, which comply with Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code: (Rev.11-16) 3 59 1. Any payment not identified as being in payment of liability owing to a designated district or districts may be apportioned among the districts as their interest appear, or, in the discretion of the Board, to all districts with which the Board has contracted using ratios reflected by the distribution of district taxes collected from all taxpayers. 2. All district taxes collected as a result of determinations or billings made by the Board, and all amounts refunded or credited may be distributed or charged to the respective districts in the same ratio as the taxpayer's self -declared district taxes for the period for which the determination, billing, refund or credit applies. B. Vehicles, Vessels, and Aircraft. For the purpose of allocating use tax with respect to vehicles, vessels, or aircraft, the address of the registered owner appearing on the application for registration or on the certificate of ownership may be used by the Board in determining the place of use. ARTICLE IV COMPENSATION The City agrees to pay to the Board as the Board's cost of administering the City Ordinance such amount as is provided for by law. Such amounts shall be deducted from the taxes collected by the Board for the City. ARTICLE V MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS A. Communications. Communications and notices may be sent by first class United States mail to the addresses listed below, or to such other addresses as the parties may from time to time designate. A notification is complete when deposited in the mail. (Rev.11-16) 4 60 Communications and notices to be sent to the Board shall be addressed to: State Board of Equalization P.O. Box 942879, MIC: 27 Sacramento, California 94279-0027 Attention: Administrator Local Revenue Branch Communications and notices to be sent to the City shall be addressed to: CITY CLERK CITY HALL, 78495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QU I NTA, CA 92253 Unless otherwise directed, transmittals of payment of District transactions and use taxes will be sent to the address above. B. Term. The date of this Agreement is the date on which it is approved by the Department of General Services. The Agreement shall take effect on April 1, 2017. This Agreement shall continue until December 31 next following the expiration date of the City Ordinance, and shall thereafter be renewed automatically from year to year until the Board completes all work necessary to the administration of the City Ordinance and has received and disbursed all payments due under that Ordinance. C. Notice of Repeal of Ordinance. City shall give the Board written notice of the repeal of the City Ordinance not less than 110 days prior to the operative date of the repeal. (Rev. 11-16) 5 61 ARTICLE VI ADMINISTRATION OF TAXES IF THE ORDINANCE IS CHALLENGED AS BEING INVALID A. Impoundment of funds. 1. When a legal action is begun challenging the validity of the imposition of the tax, the City shall deposit in an interest -bearing escrow account, any proceeds transmitted to it under Article IL C., until a court of competent jurisdiction renders a final and non -appealable judgment that the tax is valid. 2. If the tax is determined to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the City shall transmit to the Board the moneys retained in escrow, including any accumulated interest, within ten days of the judgment of the trial court in the litigation awarding costs and fees becoming final and non - appealable. B. Costs of administration. Should a final judgment be entered in any court of the State of California, holding that City's Ordinance is invalid or void, and requiring a rebate or refund to taxpayers of any taxes collected under the terms of this Agreement, the parties mutually agree that: Ordinance. 1. Board may retain all payments made by City to Board to prepare to administer the City 2. City will pay to Board and allow Board to retain Board's cost of administering the City Ordinance in the amounts set forth in Article IV of this Agreement. 3. City will pay to Board or to the State of California the amount of any taxes plus interest and penalties, if any, that Board or the State of California may be required to rebate or refund to taxpayers. (Rev.11-16) 6 62 4. City will pay to Board its costs for rebating or refunding such taxes, interest, or penalties. Board's costs shall include its additional cost for developing procedures for processing the rebates or refunds, its costs of actually making these refunds, designing and printing forms, and developing instructions for Board's staff for use in making these rebates or refunds and any other costs incurred by Board which are reasonably appropriate or necessary to make those rebates or refunds. These costs shall include Board's direct and indirect costs as specified by Section 11256 of the Government Code. 5. Costs may be accounted for in a manner, which conforms to the internal accounting, and personnel records currently maintained by the Board. The billings for such costs may be presented in summary form. Detailed records will be retained for audit and verification by City. 6. Any dispute as to the amount of costs incurred by Board in refunding taxes shall be referred to the State Director of Finance for resolution and the Director's decision shall be final. 7. Costs incurred by Board in connection with such refunds shall be billed by Board on or before the 25th day of the second month following the month in which the judgment of a court of the State of California holding City's Ordinance invalid or void becomes final. Thereafter Board shall bill City on or before the 25th of each month for all costs incurred by Board for the preceding calendar month. City shall pay to Board the amount of such costs on or before the last day of the succeeding month and shall pay to Board the total amount of taxes, interest, and penalties refunded or paid to taxpayers, together with Board costs incurred in making those refunds. CITY OF STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION By (Signature) Administrator FRANK J. SPEVACEK (Typed Name) CITY MANAGER (Title) (Rev. 1 1-16) 7 63 64 ORDINANCE NO.540 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, IMPOSING A TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX TO BE ADMINISTERED BY THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 3.27 is hereby added to Title 3 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to read. - Sections: TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX 3.27.010 Title and Applicable Territory 3.27.020 Operative Date 3.27.030 Purpose 3.27.040 Contract with State 3.27.050 Transactions Tax Rate 3.2 7.060 Place of Sale 3.27.070 Use Tax Rate 3.27.080 Adoption of Provisions of State Law 3.27.090 Limitations on Adoption of State Law and Collection of Use Taxes 3.27.100 Permit Not Required 3.27.110 Exemptions and Exclusions 3.27.120 Amendments 3.27.130 Enjoining Collection Forbidden 3.27.010 Title and Applicable Territor . This Ordinance shall be known as the La Quinta Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance. The City of La Quinta hereinafter shot[ be called "City." This Ordinance shall be applicable in the incorporated territory of the City. 3.27.020 Operative hate. "Operative Date" means the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing more than 110 days after the adoption of this Ordinance, the date of such adoption being as set forth below. 3,27.030 Purpose. This Ordinance is adopted to achieve the following, among other purposes, and directs that the provisions hereof be interpreted in order to accomplish those purposes: A. To impose a retail transactions and use tax in accordance with the provisions of Part 1.6 (commencing with Section 7251) of Division 2 of the Revenue 65 Ordinance No. 540 Add Chapter 3.27 to Title 3 - Revenue and Finance Imposing 1% Transactions and Use Tax Adopted. May 17, 2016 Page 2 of 8 and Taxation Code and Section 7285.9 of Part 1.7 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which authorizes the City to adopt this tax ordinance which shall be operative if a majority of the electors voting on the measure vote to approve the imposition of the tax at an election called for that purpose. B. To adopt a retail transactions and use tax ordinance that incorporates provisions identical to those of the Sales and Use Tax Law of the State of California insofar as those provisions are not inconsistent with the requirements and limitations contained in Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. C. To adopt a retail transactions and use tax ordinance that imposes a tax and provides a measure therefore that can be administered and collected by the State Board of Equalization in a manner that adapts itself as fully as practicable to, and requires the least possible deviation from, the existing statutory and administrative procedures followed by the State Board of Equalization in administering and collecting the California State Sales and Use Taxes. D. To adopt a retail transactions and use tax ordinance that can be administered in a manner that will be, to the greatest degree possible, consistent with the provisions of Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, minimize the cost of collecting the transactions and use taxes, and at the same time, minimize the burden of record keeping upon persons subject to taxation under the provisions of this Ordinance. 3.27.040 Contract with State. Prior to the operative date, the City shall contract with the State Board of Equalization to perform all functions incident to the administration and operation of this transactions and use tax ordinance; provided, that if the City shall not have contracted with the State Board of Equalization prior to the operative date, it shall nevertheless so contract and in such a case the operative date shall be the first day of the first calendar quarter following the execution of such a contract. 3.27.050 Transactions Tax Rate. For the privilege of selling tangible personal property at retail, a transactions and use tax is hereby imposed upon all retailers in the incorporated territory of the City at the rate of One Percent (1%) of the gross receipts of any retailer from the sale of all tangible personal property sold at retail in said territory on and after the operative date of this Ordinance. 3.27.060 Place of Sale. For the purposes of this Ordinance, all retail sales are consummated at the place of business of the retailer unless the tangible personal property sold is delivered by the retailer or his agent to an out-of-state destination or to a common carrier for delivery to an out-of-state destination. The gross receipts from such sales shall include delivery charges, when such charges are subject to the state sales and use tax, . e, Ordinance No. 540 Add Chapter 3.27 to Title 3 - Revenue and Finance Imposing 1%Transactions and Use Tax Adopted: May 17, 2016 Page 3 of 8 regardless of the place to which delivery is made. In the event a retailer has no permanent place of business in the State or has more than one place of business, the place or places at which the retail sales are consummated shall be determined under rules and regulations to be prescribed and adopted by the State Board of Equalization. 3.27.070 Use Tax Rate. An excise tax is hereby imposed on the storage, use or other consumption in the City of tangible personal property purchased from any retailer on and after the operative date of this Ordinance for storage, use or other consumption in said territory at the rate of One Percent (1%) of the sales price of the property. The sales price shall include delivery charges when such charges are subject to state sales or use tax regardless of the place to which delivery is made. 3.27.080 Adoption of Provisions of State Low. Except as otherwise provided in this Ordinance and except insofar as they are inconsistent with the provisions of Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, all of the provisions of Part 1 (commencing with Section 6001) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code are hereby adopted and made a part of this Ordinance as though fully set forth herein. 3.27.090 Limitations on Adoption of State Law and Collection of Use Taxes. In adopting the provisions of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code: A. Wherever the State of California is named or referred to as the taxing agency, the name of this City shall be substituted therefor. However, the substitution shall not be made when: 1. The word "State" is used as a part of the title of the State Controller, State Treasurer, State Board of Equalization, State Treasury, or the Constitution of the State of California; 2. The result of that substitution would require action to be taken by or against this City or any agency, officer, or employee thereof rather than by or against the State Board of Equalization, in performing the functions incident to the administration or operation of this Ordinance. 3. In those sections, including, but not necessarily limited to sections referring to the exterior boundaries of the State of California, where the result of the substitution would be to: a. Provide an exemption from this transactions and use tax with respect to certain sales, storage, use or other consumption of tangible personal property which would not otherwise be exempt from this transactions and use tax while such sales, storage, use or other consumption remain subject to sales and use tax by the State under the provisions of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, or; b. Impose this transactions and use tax with respect to certain sales, storage, use or other consumption of tangible personal property which would not be subject to sales and use tax by the state under the said provision of that code. rA Ordinance No. 544 Add Chapter 3.27 to Title 3 - Revenue and Finance Imposing 1%Transaction5 and Use Tax Adopted: May 17, 2016 Page 4 of 8 4. In Sections 6701, 6702 (except in the last sentence thereof), 6711, 6715, 6737, 6797 or 6828 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. B. The word "City" shall be substituted for the word "State" in the phrase "retailer engaged in business in this State" in Section 6203 and in the definition of that phrase in Section 6203. 3.27.100 Permit Not Required. If a seller's permit has been issued to a retailer under Section 6067 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, an additional transactors permit shall not be required by this Ordinance. 3.27.110 Exemptions and Exclusions. A. There shall be excluded from the measure of the transactions and use tax the amount of any sales or use tax imposed by the State of California or by any city, city and county, or county pursuant to the Bradley -Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law or the amount of any state -administered transactions or use tax. B. There are exempted from the computation of the amount of transactions tax the gross receipts from: 1. Sales of tangible personal property, other than fuel or petroleum products, to operators of aircraft to be used or consumed principally outside the county in which the sale is made and directly and exclusively in the use of such aircraft as common carriers of persons or property under the authority of the laws of this State, the United States, or any foreign government. 2. Sales of property to be used outside the City which is shipped to a point outside the City, pursuant to the contract of sale, by delivery to such point by the retailer or his/her agent, or by delivery by the retailer to a carrier for shipment to a consignee at such point. For the purposes of this paragraph, delivery to a point outside the City shall be satisfied; a. With respect to vehicles (other than commercial vehicles) subject to registration pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 4000) of Division 3 of the Vehicle Code, aircraft licensed in compliance with Section 21411 of the Public Utilities Code, and undocumented vessels registered under Division 3.5 (commencing with Section 9840) of the Vehicle Cade by registration to an out -of -City address and by a declaration under penalty of perjury, signed by the buyer, stating that such address is, in fact, his/her principal place of residence; and b. With respect to commercial vehicles, by registration to a place of business out -of -City and declaration under penalty of perjury, signed by the buyer, that the vehicle will be operated from that address. 3. The sale of tangible personal property if the seller is obligated to furnish the property for a fixed price pursuant to a contract entered into prior to the operative date of this Ordinance. .: Ordinance No. 540 Add Chapter 3.27 to Title 3 - Revenue and Finance Imposing 1% Transactions and Use Tax Adopted: May 17, 2016 Page 5 of 8 4. A lease of tangible personal property which is a continuing sale of such property, for any period of time for which the lessor is obligated to lease the property for an amount fixed by the lease prior to the operative date of this Ordinance. 5. For the purposes of subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this section, the sale or lease of tangible personal property shall be deemed not to be obligated pursuant to a contract or lease for any period of time for which any party to the contract or lease has the unconditional right to terminate the contract or lease upon notice, whether or not such right is exercised. C. There are exempted from the use tax imposed by this Ordinance, the storage, use or other consumption in this City of tangible personal property: 1. The gross receipts from the sale of which have been subject to a transactions tax under any state -administered transactions and use tax ordinance. 2. Other than fuel or petroleum products purchased by operators of aircraft and used or consumed by such operators directly and exclusively in the use of such aircraft as common carriers of persons or property for hire or compensation under a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued pursuant to the laws of this State, the United States, or any foreign government. This exemption is in addition to the exemptions provided in Sections 6366 and 6366.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California. 3. If the purchaser is obligated to purchase the property for a fixed price pursuant to a contract entered into prior to the operative date of this Ordinance. 4. If the possession of, or the exercise of any right or power over, the tangible personal property arises under a lease which is a continuing purchase of such property for any period of time for which the lessee is obligated to lease the property for an amount fixed by a lease prior to the operative date of this Ordinance. 5. For the purposes of subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this section, storage, use, or other consumption, or possession of, or exercise of any right or power over, tangible personal property shall be deemed not to be obligated pursuant to a contract or lease for any period of time for which any party to the contract or lease has the unconditional right to terminate the contract or lease upon notice, whether or not such right is exercised. 6. Except as provided in subparagraph (7), a retailer engaged in business in the City shall not be required to collect use tax from the purchaser of tangible personal property, unless the retailer ships or delivers the property into the City or participates within the City in making the sale of the property, including, but not limited to, soliciting or receiving the order, either directly or indirectly, at a place of business of the retailer in the City or through any representative, agent, canvasser, solicitor, subsidiary, or person in the City under the authority of the retailer. 7. "A retailer engaged in business in the City" shall also include any retailer of any of the following: vehicles subject to registration pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 4000) of Division 3 of the Vehicle Code, aircraft licensed in compliance with Section 21411 of the Public Utilities Code, or undocumented vessels registered under Division 3.5 (commencing with Section 9840) of the Vehicle Code. .• Ordinance No. 540 Add Chapter 3.27 to Title 3 - Revenue and Finance Imposing 1%Transactions and Use Tax Adopted: May 17, 2016 Page 6 of S That retailer shall be required to collect use tax from any purchaser who registers or licenses the vehicle, vessel, or aircraft at an address in the City. D. Any person subject to use tax under this Ordinance may credit against that tax any transactions tax or reimbursement for transactions tax paid to a district imposing, or retailer liable for a transactions tax pursuant to Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code with respect to the sale to the person of the property the storage, use or other consumption of which is subject to the use tax. 3.27.120 Amendments. All amendments subsequent to the effective date of this Ordinance to Part 1 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code relating to sales and use taxes and which are not inconsistent with Part 1.6 and Part 1.7 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, and all amendments to Part 1.6 and Part 1.7 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, shall automatically become a part of this Ordinance, provided however, that no such amendment shall operate so as to affect the rate, duration or receipt of revenues by the City for the transactions and use tax imposed by this Ordinance. 3.27.130 Enjoining Collection Forbidden. No injunction or writ of mandate or other legal or equitable process shall issue in any suit, action or proceeding in any court against the State or the City, or against any officer of the State ❑r the City, to prevent or enjoin the collection under this Ordinance, or Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, of any tax or any amount of tax required to be collected. SECTION 2.. CITIZEN OVERSIGHT. After this Ordinance becomes effective, the City Council for the City of La Quinta, at an open and public regular or special meeting, shall adopt a resolution that establishes a process to ensure that the revenge received by the one percent (1%n) transactions and use tax imposed under this Ordinance will be subject to annual review by an independent citizen oversight committee, and wilt remain used for the provision of services, programs and capital projects in the City of La Quinta. SECTION 3. SEVERABIL.ITY. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. SECTION 4. EF_FECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective only upon adoption by a majority of the people voting on the measure to adopt this Ordinance at the general municipal election on November 8, 2016. This Ordinance shall be considered as adopted upon the dote that the vote on this Ordinance is declared by the City Council for the City of Lo Quinta, and shall go into effect 10 days after that date. 70 Ordinance No. 540 Add Chapter 3.27 to Title 3 - Revenue and Finance Imposing 1% Transactions and Use Tax Adopted: May 17, 2016 Page 7 of 8 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held this 17th day of May, 2016, by the fallowing vote: AYES: Council Members Franklin, Osborne, Pena, Radi, Mayor Evans NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None cz� LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City C rk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: ILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 71 Ordinance No. 540 Add Chapter 3.27 to Title 3 - Revenue and Finance Imposing 1%Transactions and Use Tax Adopted: May 17, 2416 Page 8 of 8 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE } ss. CITY OF LA QUINTA } I, SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No. 540 which was introduced at a regular meeting on the 3rd day of May, 2016, and was adopted at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of May, 2016, not being less than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof. I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the City of La Quinta as specified in the Rules of Procedure adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2014-013. YV4'0-� hle� . SUSAN MAYSELS, City Cle " City of La Quinta, Californla DECLARATION OF POSTING I, SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on May 20, 2016, pursuant to Council Resolution. SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 72 RESOLUTION NO. 2016 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXAMINATION OF TRANSACTIONS (SALES) AND USE TAX RECORDS WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 540 of the CITY OF LA QUINTA hereinafter called "District" and Section 7270 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the District entered into a contract with the State Board of Equalization (hereafter referred to as "Board") to perform all functions incident to the administration and operation of the Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the District deems it desirable and necessary for authorized representatives of the District to examine confidential transactions and use tax records of the Board pertaining to transactions and use taxes collected by the Board for the District pursuant to that contract; and WHEREAS, Section 7056 of the Revenue and Taxation Code sets forth certain requirements and conditions for the disclosure of Board records and establishes criminal penalties for the unlawful disclosure of information contained in or derived from, the transactions and use tax records of the Board; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the (1) City Manager, (2) Finance Director/City Treasurer (3) Financial Services Analyst, and (4) Manager's Office Business Analyst or other officer or employee of the District designated in writing by the City Manager to the Board is hereby appointed to represent the District with authority to examine transactions and use tax records of the Board pertaining to transactions and use taxes collected for the District by the Board pursuant to the contract between the District and the Board. The information obtained by examination of Board records shall be used only for purposes related to the collection of the District's transactions and use taxes by the Board pursuant to the contract. SECTION 2. That the (1) City Manager, (2) Finance Director/City Treasurer (3) Financial Services Analyst, and (4) Manager's Office Business Analyst or other officer or employee of the District designated in writing by the City Manager to the Board is hereby appointed to represent the District with authority to examine those transactions and use tax records of the Board for purposes related to the following governmental functions of the District: a) City administration b) Revenue management and budgeting c) Community and economic development 73 Resolution No. 2016- Authorization to Examine Transactions and Use Tax Records (Measure G) Adopted: Page 2 of 3 d) Business license tax administration The information obtained by examination of Board records shall be used only for those governmental functions of the District listed above. SECTION 3. That Hinderliter, deLlamas & Associates is hereby designated to examine the transactions and use tax records of the Board pertaining to transactions and use taxes collected for the District by the Board. The person or entity designated by this section meets all of the following conditions: a) has an existing contract with the District to examine those transactions and use tax records; b) is required by that contract to disclose information contained in, or derived from those transactions and use tax records only to the officer or employee authorized under Section 1 (or Section 2) of this resolution to examine the information; c) is prohibited by that contract from performing consulting services for a retailer during the term of that contract; d) is prohibited by that contract from retaining the information contained in, or derived from those transactions and use tax records after that contract has expired. SECTION 4. That the information obtained by examination of Board records shall be used only for purposes related to the collection of District's transactions and use taxes by the Board pursuant to the contracts between the District and Board. SECTION 5. That this resolution supersedes all prior transactions and use tax resolutions of the City of La Quinta adopted pursuant to subdivision (b) of Revenue and Taxation Section 7056. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 20th day of December 2016 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 74 Resolution No. 2016- Authorization to Examine Transactions and Use Tax Records (Measure G) Adopted: Page 3 of 3 ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 75 76 ATTACHMENT 1 REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE - RTC DIVISION 2. OTHER TAXES [6001 - 60709] (Heading of Division 2 amended by Stats. 1968, Ch. 279. ) PART 1.6. TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAXES [7251 - 7279.6] (Part]. 6 added by Stats. 1969, Ch. 24. ) CHAPTER 3. Administration [7270 - 7274] ( Chapter 3 added by Stats. 1969, Ch. 24. ) 7273. In addition to the amounts otherwise provided for preparatory costs, the board shall charge each district an amount for the board's services in administering the transactions and use tax determined by the board, with the concurrence of the Department of Finance, as follows: (a) Beginning with the 2006-07 fiscal year, the amount charged all districts shall be based on the methodology described in Alternative 4C of the November 2004 report by the State Board of Equalization entitled "Response to the Supplemental Report of the 2004 Budget Act." The amount charged each district shall be based upon the district's proportional share of the revenue after weighting the revenue to equalize the differences in district tax rates. (1) The amount charged each district may be adjusted in the current fiscal year to reflect the difference between the board's budgeted costs and any significant revised estimate of costs. Any adjustment shall be subject to budgetary controls included in the Budget Act. Prior to any adjustment, the Department of Finance shall notify the Chairperson of the Joint Legislative Budget Committee not later than 30 days prior to the effective date of the adjustment. (2) The amount charged each district shall be adjusted to reflect the difference between the board's recovered costs and the actual costs incurred by the board during the fiscal year two years prior. (b) The board shall, by June 1 of each year, notify districts of the amount that it anticipates will be assessed for the next fiscal year. The districts shall be notified of the actual amounts that will be assessed within 30 days after enactment of the Budget Act for that fiscal year. (c) The amount charged a district that becomes operative during the fiscal year shall be estimated for that fiscal year based on weighted revenue. (d) The amounts determined by subdivision (a) shall be deducted in equal amounts from the quarterly allocation of taxes collected by the board for a given district. (e) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, for the 2008-09 fiscal year to the 2014-15 fiscal year, inclusive, the amounts determined by subdivision (a) shall not include any revenues collected pursuant to Sections 6051.7 and 6201.7. (Amended by Stats. 2009, 4th Ex. Sess., Ch. 12, Sec. 31. Effective July 28, 2009.) 7273.2. The board shall annually prepare a report showing the amount of both reimbursed and unreimbursed costs incurred by it in administering transactions and use taxes imposed by districts pursuant to this part. (Added by Stats. 1987, Ch. 786, Sec. 4.) 77 78 City of La Q u i nta CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO.6 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 20, 2016 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED DECEMBER 2 AND DECEMBER 9, 2016 RECOMMENDATION Approve demand registers dated December 2 and December 9, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - None FISCAL IMPACT Demand of Cash: City $ 2,804,842.14 Successor Agency of RDA $ 13,000.00 Housing Authority $ 11,214.84 Housing Authority Commission $ - $ 2,829,056.98 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Between Council meetings, routine bills and payroll must be paid. Attachment 1 details the weekly demand registers for December 02 and December 09, 2016. Warrants Issued: 113146-113244 $ 280,083.16 113245-113314 $ 1,733,705.72 Voids $ (12.61) Wire Transfers $ 481,290.32 P/R Ck 37145-37170 & Direct Dep. $ 233,683.81 Payroll Tax Transfers $ 100,306.58 $ 2,829,056.98 In the amount listed above, one check was voided. Check No. 111528 was voided and re- issued because the customer did not receive the check. 79 The most significant expenditures on the demand registers listed above are as follows: Vendor Imperial Irrigation District Conserve Landcare International Urban Habitat Environmental Iota Griffin LLC Account Name Utilities Various Construction Amount Purpose $ 36,035.16 Electricity Service Developer Deposits $ Riverside County Sheriff Various 39,046.71 Dec - Landscape Services 82,354.85 North La Quinta Parkway Turf Conversion 418,987.00 Release of Monroe St. Improvements Deposit 992,541.23 Sep - Police Services Wire Transfers: Twelve transfers totaled $520,085.60. Of this amount, $337,603.69 was to Landmark Golf Management, and $95,426.07 was to CalPERS Health and $36,057.15 to Ca[PERS. (See Attachment 2 for a full listing). ALTERNATIVES Council may approve, partially approve, or reject the demand registers. Prepared by: Derrick Armendariz, Account Technician Approved by: Karla Campos, Finance Director Attachment: 1. Demand Registers 2. Wire Transfers :rs, .ATTACHMENT 1 Demand Register w` "r, n City of La Quints, CA Packet: APPKT00920 - ❑A 12/02/16 ii Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Furnd,101- GENERAL FUND 2XL CORPORATION 113146 11/15/16- WC GYM WIPES USE TAX Sales Taxes Payable 101.0000.20304 -24.26 2XL CORPORATION 113146 11/15/16- WC GYM WIPES Operating Supplies 101-3D02-60420 423.82 ACCOUNTEMPS 113147 11/D4/16-TEMP STAFFING Tern poraryAge ncyServices 101-6D01-60125 358.40 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE 113148 10/31/16- CHP BLOOD DRAW Blood/Alcohol Testing 101-2001-60174 40.00 AMERICAN PLANNING AS50 113149 11/02/16-APA MEMBERSHIP Membership Dues 101-6002-60351 600.00 AMERIPRiDE SERVICES INC 113150 11/24/16-WCJANITORIALSUPPLIES Janitorial 101-3008-60115 152.59 AUDIOVISUAL MEETING PR 113152 11/17/16- CHRISTMAS TREE LIGHTING Special Events 101.3003.60149 2,452.D0 310 CLEAR WATER SOLUTION 113155 11/16- CC CAMPUS POND MAINT Civic Center Lake Maintenan 101-3D05-60117 1,217.50 BLACK & COMPANY LLC, TERI 113156 10/05/16-. FINANCE DIRECTOR RECRUIT Consultants 101-lD04-60104 6,385,46 BMI 113157 11/02/16- MUSIC LICENSING Marketing & Tourism Promo 101-3D07-60461 336.00 BURRTEC WASTE & RECYCLI 113159 11/30/16- HAND WASHING STATIONS Special Events Sponsorships 101-ODOD-22936 168.52 CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFIC 113160 10/19/16- CAL BLDG OFF.TRAINING Travel & Training 101-GDO&60320 195.00 CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S O 113161 11/10/16- DISASTER RECOVERY TRAINI Travel & Training 101-2002-60320 500.00 CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S 0 113161 11/10/16- DISASTER TRAINING Travel & Training 101-2002-60320 450.00 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREA 123162 10/21/16-CPRS MEMBERSHIP 17/19 Membership Dues 101-3D01-60351 150.00 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREA 113162 10/21/15-CPRS MEMBERSHIP 17/18 Membership Dues 101-3001-60351 475A0 CALIPERS LONG-TERM CARE 113163 LONG TERM CARE LT Care Insurance Pay 101-ODOD-20949 196.05 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 113164 11/10/16- VETERANS DAY TREATS Special Events 101-3DO3-60149 31.98 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 113164 11/09/16- WC THANKSGIVING LUNCHE Operating Supplies 101-3002-60470 47.92 2ASH/PETTY CASH 113165 11/22/16- ICE FOR BREW LQ EVENT Special Events Sponsorships 101-OODD-22836 22.94 :ASH/PETTY CASH 113165 11/22/16- ICE FOR BREW LQ, EVENT Special Events Sponsorships 101-DDOD-22836 5.97 :ASH/PETTY CASH 113165 11/22/16- CASH SHORT Cash Over/Short 101-DOOD-42300 5.00 CASH/PETTY CASH 113165 11/22/16- REVIEW PANEL REIMB Travel &Training 101-1004-60320 14.95 -ASH/PETTY CASH 113165 11/22/16- OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 8.31 :ASH/PETTY CASH 113165 11/22/16- POSTAGE REIMB Postage 101-1007-60470 12,44 :ASH/PETTY CASH 113165 11/22/16- CITIZENS ON PATROL MTG LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 14.46 :ASH/PETTY CASH 113165 11/22/16- HOUSING SEMINAR Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-6017S 59.98 :ASH/PETTY CASH 113165 11/22/I6. CERT MEETING Disaster Prep Supplies 101-2002-60406 4.49 :ASH/PETTY CASH 113165 11/22/16- TABLE COVERS Office Supplies 101-3001-60MO 6.48 :ASH/PETTY CASH 113165 11/22/16- ICE FOR DOG 0 WEEN Special Events 101-3003-60149 4.50 ;ASH/PETTY CASH 213165 11/22/16- DOG 0 WEEN PRIZES Special Events 101-3003-60149 46.01 :ASH/PETTY CASH 113165 11/22/16- DOG O WEEN PRIZES Special Events 101-3003-60249 15.34 :ASH/PETTY CASH 113165 11/22/16- DOG O WEEN PRIZES Special Events 101-3003-60149 3.22 :ASH/PETTY CASH 113165 11/22/16- WATER TINE Sports Complex Building 101-3005-60555 13-02 :ASH/PETTY CASH 113165 11/22/16- ART EVENT Marketing & Tourism Promo 101-3007-60461 3.37 :ASH/PETTY CASH 113165 11/22/16- TOILET SEAT GASKET Repair St Maintenance 101-3008-60691 79.19 :LEAR50URCE FINANCIAL C 113166 11/15/16- ANNUAL ASSESSMENT 16/17 Professional Services 101-7002.60103 3,500.00 'OACH ELLA VALLEY WATER 113167 11/21/16- WATER SERVICE Utilities - Water - Civic Cente 101-3005-61202 6,025.64 :OACHELLA VALLEY WATER 113167 11/21/16- WATER SERVICE Utilities- Water -Community 101-3005-61209 6,353.93 :OACHELLA VALLEY WATER 113167 11/21/16- WATER SERVICE Water - Inside 101-3002-6120D 360.46 :OACHELLA VALLEY WATER 113167 11/21/16- WATER SERVICE Utilities - Water - Civic Cente 101-3005-61202 240.71 :OACHELLA VALLEY WATER 113167 11/21/16- WATER SERVICE Utilities - Water -Fritz Burns 101-3005-61204 637.25 :OACHELLAVALLEY WATER 113167 11/21/16- WATER SERVICE Utilities - Water 101.3008.61200 174AS :ONSERVE LANDCARE 113168 01/3VI6- CC CAMPUS TREE REMOVAL Tree Maintenance 101-30OS-60557 680,00 :V STRATEGIES 113169 11/08/16- BUDGET GUIDE 16/17 Professional Services 101-1006-60103 4,536,25 )AIOHS FIRST CHOICE SERVI 113170 07125/16- COFFEE SUPPLIES Citywide Conf Room Sup plie 101-1007-60403 212.69 )AIOHS FIRST CHOICE SERVI 113170 09/20/16- COFFEE SUPPLIES Citywide Conf Roam Supplie 101-1007-60403 211.66 )AIOHS FIRST CHOICE SERVI 113170 11/15/16- COFFEE SUPPLIES Citywide Conf Room Supplie 101-1007-60403 191.49 )AIOHS FIRST CHOICE SERVI 113170 11/15/16- COFFEE SUPPLIES Citywide Conf Room Supplie 101-1007-60403 12,99 )EPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 113171 11/02/16- FINGERPRINTS Instructors 101-3002-60107 224.00 )EPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 113171 11/08/16- BLOOD ALCOHOL Blood/Alcohol Testing 101-2001-60174 140.00 )ESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO 113174 10/14/16- PUBLIC HEARING Membership Dues 101-1002-60351 206.DO )ESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO 113174 10/12/16- PUBLICATION Advertising 101-1005-60450 462.00 2/2/2016 11.14:1D AM Page 1 of 8 81 Demand Register Packet: APPKT00920 - DA 12/02/16 Vendor Name . Payment Number Description [Item] Account Name Account Number Amount DESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO 113174 09/30/16- PUBLIC HEARING Advertising 101-6002-60450 290.00 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO 113174 09/30/16- PUBLIC HEARING Advertising 101-6002-60450 462.00 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO 113174 10/12/16- PUBLIC HEARING Advertising 101-6002-60450 346.00 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO 113174 10/07/16- PUBLIC HEARING Advertising 101-6002-60450 302.00 DESERT SUN, THE 113175 12/16- SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE Subscriptions & Publications 101-6001-60952 59.14 DIANA FRANCO 113176 11/21/16- RENTAL REFUND Miscellaneous Deposits 101-0000-22830 50.00 ENCHANTED MEMORIES PAR 113177 12/02/16- ELVES IN COSTUMES Special Events 101-3003-60149 391.00 E5MNOZA, DAVID C. 113179 11/11/16- VETERANS DAY CHAIRS Special Events 101-3003-60149 395.00 ESPIN OZA, DAVID C, 113179 12/02/16- CHRISTMAS TREE LIGHTING Special Events 101-3003.60149 395.00 FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESER 113180 11/08/16- FB POOL OPERATION CONTR Fritz Bums Park 101-3005-60184 9,494.32 FASANO, MARY 113181 11/07/16- CALBO TRAINING Travel & Training 101-6006-60320 119.01 FEDEX 113182 11/11/16- OVERNIGHT MAIL Postage 101-1007-60470 24.27 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 113183 GARNISHMENT Garnishments Payable 101-0000.20995 125.00 FRONTIER COMMUNICATION 113194 11/16- PHONE SERVICE LQ Park Building 101-3005.60554 42.88 GALLS LLC 113195 11/03/16- PANTS & BELT LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 54.02 GALLS LLC 113185 11/08/16- NAMEPLATE LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 15.81 GARDAWORLD 113186 12/01/16- ARMORED TRANSPORTATIO Professional Services 101-1006-60103 101.03 GIDCO AG. DESIGN & CONSU 113197 11/17/16- OPHELIA FLAGS INSTALL Special Events 101-3003-60149 188.00 GONSALVES, JOE A & SON 113188 11/14/16- LEGISLATIVE SERVICE Contract Services - Administr 101-1002-60101 3,500.00 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113189 11/20/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE Utilities - Electricity 102-2002-61101 542.15 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113189 11/20/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE Utilities- Electricity 101-3008-61101 212,89 1MPERIALIRRIGA710NDIST 113189 11/22/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE Utilities- Electricity 101-2002-61101 1,235.67 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113189 11/22/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE Utilities - Electric - CnricCent 101-3005-61103 2,755.95 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113189 11/22/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE Utilities- Electric- Fritz Burn 101-3005-61105 1,2D9.63 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113189 11/22/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE Utilities - Electric - Sports Co 101-3005-61106 3,323.59 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113189 11/22/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE Utilities - Electricity 101-3008-61101 8,425.80 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113189 11/29/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE Utilities- Electricity 101-2002-61101 721.90 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113189 11/29/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE Utilities - Electric - Monticell 101-3005-61102 13.52 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113199 11/29/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE Utilities- Electric -Colonel P 101-3005-61108 958.41 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113189 11/29/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE Utilities - Electric - Communi 101-3005-61109 4,031.29 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113299 11/29/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE Utilities - Electric -Adams Pa 101-3005-61110 54.92 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 1131$9 11/29/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE Utilities - Electric - Eisenhow 101-3005-61113 22.99 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113189 11/29/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE Utilities - Electric - Desert Pri 101-3005-61114 13.04 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT SO 113191 11/22/16- CONTRACT COPIER STAPLES Copiers 101-1007-60662 67.98 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT SO 113191 11/22/16- CONTRACT COPIER STAPLES Copiers 101-1007.60662 67.98 INTERWEST CONSULTING GR 113192 ON -CALL ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK SV Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 1,344.00 INTERWEST CONSULTING GR 113192 ON -CALL ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK SV Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 1,320.00 KEPLER, KRISTOFFER 113194 11/22/16- PERSONAL TRAINER Instructors 101-3002-60107 448.00 LA RUINTA BREWING CO. 113195 11/17/16- REFUND OVERPAYMENT Cash Liver/Short 101-0000.42300 197.00 LIDGARD AND ASSOCIATES, 1 113196 11/02/16- MARKET VALUE STUDY Consultants 101-6001-60104 2,250+00 LOCK SHOP INC, THE 113197 11/18/16- KEYS FOR CITY HALL Repair & Maintenance 101-3008-60691 210.47 LOCK SHOP INC, THE 113197 11/21/16- KEYS FOR CITY HALL Repair & Maintenance 101-3008-60691 4.75 MINAPS CAFE 113198 12/08/16- WC CHRISTMAS LUNCHEON Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 670,68 NI GOVERNMENT SERVICES 1 113199 11/01/16- SATELLITE PHONES Mobile/Cell Phones 101-2002-61304 154.75 OFFICE DEPOT 113201 11/03/16- ERGONOMIC ITEMS Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 39.56 OFFICE DEPOT 113201 10/27/16- BUSINESS CARDS Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 79.92 OFFICE DEPOT 113201 11/03/16- BUSINESS CARDS Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 79.92 OFFICE DEPOT 113201 11/01/16- OFFICE SUPPLIES Supplies - Field 101-6004-60425 14.21 OFFICE DEPOT 113201 11/04/16- PLACE CARDS Employee Recognition Awar 101-1004.60340 15.54 OFFICE DEPOT 113201 11/10/16- ENVELOPES Forms 101-1007-60402 131.91 OFFICE DEPOT 113201 11/17/16. OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 35.45 OFFICE DEPOT 113201 11/17/16- TONER Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 64.14 OFFICE TEAM 113202 11/04/16-TEMP STAFFING Temporary Agency Services 101-6004-60125 840.OD OFFICE TEAM 113202 11/11/16- TE M P STAF F IN G Temporary Agency Services 101-6004-60125 672,00 OFFICE TEAM 113202 11/11/16- TEMP STAFFING Temporary Agency Staff 101-6006-60125 504.00 OFFICE TEAM 113202 11/18/16- TEMP STAFFING Temporary Agency Services 101-6004-60125 819.00 ONTRAC 113203 11/05/16- OVERNIGHT MAIL Postage 101-1007-60470 34.38 PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 113204 10/18/16- BANNER FOR BREW IN LQ Special Events Sponsorships 101-0000-22836 358.02 PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 113204 10/19/16- SIGN FOR BREW IN LQ Special Events Sponsorships 101-0000-22836 81.00 PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 113204 11/21/16- PROMOTIONAL MATERIAL Special Events Sponsorships 101-0000-22836 50.71 12/2/2016 11.14:10 AM Page 2 of 8 82 Demand Register Packet: APPKTW920 - DA 22/02/16 Vendor Name Payment Number, Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 113204 11/10/16- FURNITURE COASTERS Maint: Other Equipment 101-3008-60665 273.39 PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 113204 11/28/16- WC STAFF SHIRTS Operating Supplies 101-3003-60420 462.55 PATRICIA A REYNAN INC 113205 11/23/16- REFUND OVERPAYMENT Cash Over/Short 101-0000-42300 25.00 PENA, JOHN 1132W 10/05-14/07/16-TRAVEL REIMB Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 190.90 PRINTING PLACE, THE 113209 09/29/16-ACO CITATION BOOKS Printing 101-60D4-60410 885.48 PROPER SOLUTIONS INC 113210 11/18/15-TEMP STAFFING Temporary Agency Services 101-6001-60125 408.48 PU E8L0 UNIDO CDC 113211 11/21/16- RENTAL REFUND Miscellaneous Deposits 101-GOOD-22830 100.00 RASA/ERIC NELSON 113212 11/11/16- PLAN CHECK SERVICES Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 190.00 RASAIERIC NELSON 113212 11/11/16- PLAN CHECK SERVICE Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 19D.00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF 113214 07/25-08/24/16- MOTOR & COP GAS Sheriff -Other 101-2001-60176 358.55 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF 113214 08/25-09/24/16- MOTOR & COP GAS Sheriff -Other 101-2001-60176 641.38 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF 113214 09/25-10/24116- MOTOR & COP GAS Sheriff -Other 101-2001-60176 664.31 RIVERSIDE DEPARTMENT OF 113215 GARNISHMENT Garnishments Payable 101.00DO.2D985 20D.00 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 113216 09/02/16- TEMP STAFFING Temporary Agency Staff 101-6006-60125 1,507.20 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 113216 09/14/16-TEMPSTAFFING Tern pora ry Age n cy St aff 101-6006-60125 1,507.20 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 113216 09/16/16- TEMP STAFFING Temporary Agency Staff 101-6006-60125 1,994.00 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 113216 09/23/16- TEMP STAFFING Temporary Agency Staff 101-6006-60125 1,894.00 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 113216 09/30/16- TEMP STAFFING Temporary Agency Staff 101-6006-60125 1,507.20 ROJAS, MIGUEL ANGEL 113217 11/22/16-TAEKWONDO Instructors 201-3002-60107 584.68 ROYAL GYM SERVICES 113218 11/16/16- WC GYM EQUIPMENT CABLE Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 390.30 SALCEDO, KATHLEEN 113219 11/22/16- ZUMBA Instructors 101-3002-60107 79.80 SECU RITAS SECURITY SERVIC 113220 10/28/16- BREW IN LQ SECURITY Special Events Sponsorships 101-0000-22836 1,557.00 5 ECU R ITAS SEC U R ITY SE RVI C 113220 11/04/16-FACILITY RENTAL Rental Expense 101-3003-60157 126.00 SHIRY, TERESA 113221 11/22/16- FRIDAY NIGHT DANCE Instructors 101-3002-60107 182.00 SILVERROCK RESORT 113223 10/16. OCTOBER SALES TAX Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000-20304 74.00 SIMPLY DELICIOUS 113224 11/15/16- COUNCIL MEETING SUPPLIES Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 120.00 SINATRA, BARBARA CHILDRE 113225 11/01/ 16- 5 EXU AL ASSAU LT EXAM Sexual Assault Exam Fees 101-2001-60193 28&00 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 113227 11/02/16- IRRIG BOX COVERS Materials - Irrigation & Light 101-3005-60424 44.91 SNYDER, JANICE 113228 11/22/16- P ERSONAL TRA I N E R Instructors 101-3002-60107 243.20 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 113229 11/21/16- OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-3005-60400 99.90 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 123229 11/25/16- BATTERIES Office Supplies 101-3005-60400 -24.25 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 113229 11/25/16- OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-30OS-60400 39.36 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 113229 11/03/16- OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-3002-60400 100.14 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 113229 11/15/16- OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-3005-60400 55.06 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 113229 11/06/16.OFFICES UPPLIES Office Supplies 101-1002-60400 28.02 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 113229 11/06/16- OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-1002-60400 13.71 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 113229 11/09/16- PAPER Office Supplies 101.6001-60400 66.30 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 113229 11/11/16- FOLDERS Office Supplies 101-6001.60400 43.16 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 113229 11/11/16- OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-6002-60400 5.71 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR U 113230 11/01/16- 5UNGARD MEMBERSHIP 201 Membership Dues 101-6006-60351 195A0 TIME WARNER CABLE 113231 11/16-12/15116- FS #32 CABLE Utilities - Cable 101-2002-61400 66.18 TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 113232 11/11/16- FS 470 TRAFFIC PLANS Consultants 101-6001-60104 500.00 TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 113232 11/11/16- FS #32 TRAFFIC PLANS Consultants 101-6001-60104 500.00 TRULY NOLEN INC 113294 11/04/16- LQ PARK PEST CONTROL Pest Control 101-3008-60116 61.00 TRULY NOLEN INC 113234 11/16/16- CH PEST CONTROL Pest Control 101-3008-60116 74.00 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 113235 CONTRIBUTION United Way Deductions 101-0000-20981 30.00 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE 113237 11/30/16- ULI MEMBERSHIP BUNKER Membership Dues 101-1002-60351 220.00 VIELHARBER, KAREN 113238 11/22/16- FLEX YOGA Instructors 101-3002-60107 80.50 WALLACE & ASSOCIATES CO 113240 WALLACE & ASSOCIATES Consultants 101-7006-60104 1,560.00 WALLACE & ASSOCIATES CO 113240 WALLACE & ASSOCIATES Consultants 101-7006-60104 12,220.00 WALMART COMMUNITY 113241 11/08- STAFF DEVELOPMENT Training & Education 101-1004.60321 12.21 WALMART COMMUNITY 113242 11/03- WC SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 127.03 WALMART COMMUNITY 113241 10/27- ZOMBIE RUN PRIZES Special Events 101-3003-60149 51.00 WATERLOGIC USA FINANCE I 113242 11/09/16- CH WATER COOLER Utilities - Water 101-3008-61200 226.80 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/12- POOLS FOR BREW LQ USE TAX Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000.20304 -2.97 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/10- EVENTBRITE READER Special Events Sponsorships 101-0000-22836 32.94 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/19- ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FEES Special Events Sponsorships 101-0000-22836 4.57 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/19-ENVIRONMENTALHEALTHFIE ES Special Events Sponsorships 101-0OOO-22836 193.00 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/12- POOLS FOR BREW LQ Special Events Sponsorships 101-0000-22836 49.92 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 112243 10/07- LEAGUE OF CITIES CONFERENCE Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 523.48 12/2/2016 11:14.10 AM Page 3 of 8 83 Demand Register Packet: APPKT00920 - DA 12/02116 Vendot Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/07- LEAGUE OF CITIES CONFERENCE Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 491.48 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/06- UPDATE WITH MAYOR Travel &Training 101-1001-6032D 19.00 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/05- LEAGUE OF CITIES Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 22.00 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/05- SR PROJECT UPDATE Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 65.57 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/18-COUNCI L MEETING Travel &Training 101-1001-60320 84.24 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/10- MEETING WITH MAYOR Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 70.32 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/07- LEAGUE OF CITIES CONFERENCE Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 533.48 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/07- LEAGUE OF CITIES CONFERENCE Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 4.00 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/07- LEAGUE OF CITIES CONFERENCE Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 539.48 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/27- UPDATE WITH MAYOR Travel & Training 101-1002-60320 37.81 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/11- UPDATE WITH COUNCIL Trave) &Training 101-1002-60320 37.32 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/18- LQACADEMY LUNCHEON Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 65.00 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/18- LQACADEMY LUNCHEON Travel &Training 101-1004-60320 141.98 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/18- PACE PALETTES Office Supplies 101-1004•60400 309.88 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/20- DIGICERT RENEWAL Professional Services 101-1005-60103 379,00 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/22- NUTS & BOLTS TRAINING Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 197,25 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10119- NOTARYJOURNAL Operating Supplies 101-1005-60420 25.52 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/21-20MBIETAG FLAGS Special Events 101-3003-60149 26.99 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/26- GIANT PARK GAMES Operating Supplies 101-3003-60420 449.99 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/18- GIANT PARK GAMES Operating Supplies 101-3003-W420 295.78 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/27- GIANT PARK GAMES Operating Supplies 101-3003-60420 31.98 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/19- SAFETY SHIRTS Uniforms 101-3005-60690 241.50 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10119- SAFETY SHIRTS Safety Gear 101-7006-60427 266.50 WILLDAN 113244 TRAFFICCOUNTS Traffic Counts/Studies 101.7006-60145 8,197.52 WILLDAN 113244 TRAFFICCOUNTS Traffic Counts/Studies 101-7006-60145 616.00 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total: 135,723.36 Fund: 201- GAS TAX FUND IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113189 11121/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE Utilities - Electricity 201-7003-61101 805.71 SKILLPATH SEMINARS 113226 11/18/16- MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL Travel & Train Ing 201-7003-60320 249.00 TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 113232 11/11/16- TRAFFIC CONTROL Signs 201.7003-60429 145.17 TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 113232 11/11/16- TRAFFIC CONTROL Signs 201.7003-60429 116.53 TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 113232 11/11/16- TRAFFIC CONTROL Signs 201-7003-60429 145.17 TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 113232 11/14/16- TRAFFIC CONTROL Signs 201-7003-60429 227.61 TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 113232 11/16/16- SIGNS/LEGENDS PAINT Paint/Legends 201-7003-6D433 231,34 Fund 201- GAS TAX FUND Total: 1,920.53 fund: 202 -LIBRARY FUND DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 113173 11/18116- LIGHT BULBS Repair & Maintenance 202.3004-60691 385.56 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113189 11/22/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE Utilities - Electricity 202-3004-61101 3,07T61 TRULY NOLEN INC 113234 11/02116- LIBRARY PEST CONTROL Pest Control 202-3004-60116 74.00 TRULY NOLEN INC 113234 11/04/16- MUSEUM PEST CONTROL Pest Control 202.3006-60116 47.00 Fund 202 - LIBRARY FUND Total: 31584.17 Fund: 215- LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 113167 FRONTIER COMMUNICATION 113184 FRONTIER COMMUNICATION 113184 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113189 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113189 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113189 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113189 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113189 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 113189 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 113227 Fund: 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY NIETO, PAM 113200 11/21/16- WATER SERVICE 11/07-12/06116- SIGNAL BOX SERVICE 11/10-12/09/16- SIGNAL BOX SERVICE 11/18/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE 11/18/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE 11121/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE 11/21/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE 11/29/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE 11129/16- ELECTRICITY SERVICE 11/04/16- IRRIGATION SUPPLIES Utilities - Water - Medians 215-7004-61211 Utilities - Electric -Signals 215-7004-61116 Utilities -Electric -Signals 215-7004-61116 Utilities - Electric -Signals 215-7004-61116 Utilities - Electric - Medians 215-7004-61117 Utilities - Electric - Signals 215-7004-61116 Utilities - Electric - Medians 215-7DD4-61117 Utilities - Electric - Signals 215-7004-61116 Utilities - Electric - Medians 215-70D4.61117 Materials 215-7004-60431 Fund 215- LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: 11/12/16- TABLECLOTHS REIMB Operating Supplies 241-9101-60420 Fund 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY Total: 14,837.05 95.72 37.40 196.29 400.81 1,926.14 1,060.77 3,472.78 1,573.30 _ ST43 23,657.69 24.02 24.02 12/2/2016 11:14;10 AM 84 Page 4 of S. Demand Register Packet: APPKT00920 - DA 12/02/16 Vendor Name Payment Number Description Iltem) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 24a - SA 2004 LO/MOD BOND FUND IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRI 113190 08/31/16- WASH ST ENGINEERING FEE Design 248-0000-60185 2,000.00 Fund 248 - SA 2004 LO/MOD BOND FUND Total: 2,000.00 Fund: 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS BAKER, MICHAEL JNTERNATI 113153 5RR PHASE II INFRASTRUCTURE PRJ 201 Design 401-0000-60185 51A8 CASH/PETTY CASH 11316S 11/22/16- CABLE PIN TOOLS Construction 401-0000-60188 9.70 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO 113174 09/28-10/05/16- INVITATION BID Construction 401-0000-60188 950.00 PLANIT REPROGRAPHICS SYS 113207 11/21/16- COVE OASIS PLANS 2015.11 Construction 401-000D-60188 87,00 PLANIT REPROGRAPHICS SYS 113207 11/21/16- COVE OASIS PLANS 2015-11 Construction 401-0000-60188 168.70 URBAN HABITAT ENVIRONM 113236 NORTH LQPAR KWAY TURF DEL ORO, PR Construction 401-0000-60188 86,689.32 URBAN HABITAT ENVIRONM 113236 11/22/16- RETENTION 2016-03A PO#17 Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 -4,334.47 VOL2 DESIGN, DAVID 113239 MILES MEDIAN LANDSCAPE IMPROVEM Design 401-0000-60185 3,202.50 Fund 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total: 86,823.93 Fund: 501- EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT BURRTEC ENVIRONMENTAL 113158 10/31/16- CH COURTYARD PJT Cvc Ctr Bldg Repl/Repair 501-0000-71103 1,222.62 ENTERPRISE RENT -A -CAR 113178 10/31/16- VEHICLE RENTAL Vehicle Repair & Maintenanc 501-0000-60676 96A3 JOHNSON MACHINERY CO. 113193 11/09/16- SCISSORUFT RENTAL Cvc Ctr Bldg Repl/Repair 501-0000-71103 1,660.65 TOWER ENERGY GROUP 113233 11/16/16- UNLEAD/DIESEL FUEL Fuel & Oil 501-0000-60674 2,388.37 Fund $01- EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Total: 4,368.07 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY APPLE FINANCIAL SERVICES 113151 11/09/16- IPAD APPLE LEASE Computers 502-0000-80103 429.70 CASH/PETTY CASH 113165 11/22/16- CAMERA CABLE Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 21.59 DESERT CAM INC 113172 11/15/16- COUNCIL MTG VIDEO Consultants 502-0000.60104 52.50 FRONTIER COMMUNICATION 113184 11/10-12/09/16- INTERNET SVC Technical 502-0000-60108 89.99 PLUG & PAYTECHNOLOGIES I 113208 10/16-HUB CREDIT CARD FEES Credit Card Fee 502-0000-60122 20.00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY INFORM 113213 08/01/16- DATA SUBSCRIPTION Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 2,800.00 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 113216 10/10/16- TEMP STAFFING Temporary Agency Services 502-0000-60125 376.80 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 113216 30/20/16- TEMP STAFFING Temporary Agency Services 502.0000-60125 376-80 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 113215 10/26/16- TEMP STAFFING Temporary Agency Services 502-0000-60175 1,460.10 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 113216 10/31/16- TEMP STAFFING Temporary Agency Services 502-0000-60125 1,365.90 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 113216 11/09/16- TEMP STAFFING Temporary Agency Services 502-0000-60125 1,413.00 SIGMANET 113222 11/16-RIM MANAGEMENT Consultants 502-0000-60104 13,050.00 TIME WARNER CABLE 113231 11/12/16- CABLE SERVICE Utilities- Cable 502-0000-61400 8.83 TIME WARNER CABLE 113231 11/24.12/23/16-WC CABLE Utilities - Cable 502-0000-61400 238.98 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113243 10/D4- BASECAMP SOFTWARE Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 50.00 Fund S02 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total: 21,7S4.19 Fund: 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FND BANG INC, DAVE 113154 10/20/16- EISEHOWER PARK SWINGS Parks 503-0000-71060 227.20 Fund 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FND Total: 227.10 Grand Total: 280,083,16 1212/2016 11:14:10 AM 85 Page 5. of 8 Demand Register Packet: APPKTOO920 - DA 12/02/16 Fund Summary Fund 101-GENERAL FUND 201- GAS TAX FUND 202- LIBRARY FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FU ND 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY 248 - SA 2004 LO/MOO BOND FUND 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 501- EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 502 - INFORMATION TECHN0L06Y 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FND Account Number 101-0000-20304 101-0000-20949 101-ODDO-20981 101-0000-20985 101-ODOO-22830 101-0000-22836 101-ODOO-4230D 101-1001-50320 101-1002-60101 101-1002-60320 101-1002-60351 101-1002-60400 101-1004• 60104 101-1004-60320 101-1004-60321 101-10D4-60340 101-1004-60400 101-1005-60103 101-1005-60320 101-1.005-60420 101-100S-604SO 101-1006-60103 101-1006-60400 101-1007-60402 101-1007-60403 101-1007-60470 101-1007-60662 101-2001-60109 101-2001-60174 101-2001-60175 101-2001-60176 101-2001-60193 101-2002-60320 101-2002-60406 101-2002-61101 101-2002-61304 101-2002-61400 101-3001-60351 101.3001.60400 101-3002-60107 101-3002-60400 101-3002-60420 101-3002-61200 101-3003-60149 101-3003-60157 Grand Total: Account Summary Account Name Sales Taxes Payable LT Care Insurance Pay United Way Deductions Garnishments Payable Miscellaneous Deposits Special Events Sponsors Cash Over/Short Travel & Training Contract Services - Admi Travel & Training Membership Dues Office Supplies Consultants Travel & Training Training & Education Employee Recognition A Office Supplies Professional Services Travel & Training Operating Supplies Advertising Professional Services Office Supplies Forms Citywide Conf Room Sup Postage Coplers, LQ Police Volunteers Blood/Alcohol Testing Special Enforcement Fun Sheriff - Other Sexual Assault Exam Fee Travel & Training Disaster Prep Supplies Utilities - Electricity Mobile/Cell Phones Utilities - Cable Membership Dues Office Sup piles Instructors Office Supplies Operating Supplies Water - Inside Special Events Rental Expense Expense Amount 135,723.36 1,920.53 3,584.17 23,557.69 24.02 2,000.00 86,823.93 4,368.07 21,754.19 227.20 290,083.16 Expense Amount 46.77 196.05 30.00 325.00 150.00 2,513.59 227.00 2,653,95 3,500,00 75,13 426.00 41.73 6,385A5 221,93 12.21 15.54 309,88 379.00 197,25 25,52 462.00 4,637.28 147.46 131.91 628,83 71.09 135.96, 84.29 180.00 219.82 1,664.24 285.00 950.00 4A9 2,499.72 154.75 66.18 625.00 6.48 1,842.18 100.14 1,659.75 160.46 4,000.04 126.00 12/2/2016 11:14:10 AM Page 6 of 8 86 Demand Register Packet: APPKT0D920 - DA 12/02/16 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-3003-60420 operating Supplies 1,240.30 101-3005-60117 Civic Center Lake Mainte 1,217.50 101.3005-60184 Fritz Burns Park 9,494.32 101-3005-60400 office Supplies 170.07 101-3005-60424 Materials - Irrigation & L 44.91 101-3005.60554 LCt Park Building 42.88 101-3005-60555 sports complex Building 13.02 101-3005-60557 Tree Maintenance 680.00 101-3005-60690 Uniforms 241.50 101-3005-61102 Utilities - Electric - Monti 13.52 101-3005.61103 Utilities - Electric - Civic 2,755.95 101-3005.61105 Utilities - Electric - Fritz 1,209.63 101-3005-61106 Utilities - Electric - Sport 3,323.59 101-3005-61108 Utilities - Electric»Colon 958.41 101-3005-61109 Utilities - Electric - Cam 4,031.29 101-3005.61110 Utilities - Electric - Adam 54.92 101-3005-61113 Utilities - Electric - Eisen 22.99 101-3005-61114 Utilities - Electric - Deser 13.04 101-3005.61202 Utilities - Water - Civic C 6,266,35 101-3005-61204 Utilities - Water -Fritz Bu 637.25 101-3005-61209 Utilities - Water -Commu 6,353.93 101-3007-RM61 Marketing & Tourism Pr 339.37 101-3008.60115 Janitorial 152.59 101-3008-60116 Pest Control 135.00 101-3008-60665 Maint.-Other Equipment 273.39 101-3008-60691 Repair & Maintenance 294.41 101-3008-61101 Utilities - Electricity 8,639.69 101-3008-61200 Utilities - Water 400.95 101.6001-60104 Consultants 3,250.00 101-6001-60125 Temporary Agency Servi 766.88 101-6001-60352 Subscriptions & Publicati 59.14 101-6001-60400 Office Supplies 115.17 101-6002-60351 Membership Dues 600.00 101.6002-60450 Advertising 1,400.00 101-6004-60125 Temporary Agency Servi 2,331.00 101-60D4.60410 Printing 985.48 101-6D04-60425 Supplies - Field 14.21 101-6006-60125 Temporary Agency Staff 8,793.60 101-6006-60320 Travel & Training 314.01 101-6006-60351 Membership Dues 195.00 301-7002-60103 Professional Services 3,500.00 1D1-7002-60183 Map/Plan Checking 3,044.00 101-7006-60104 Consultants 13,780.00 101-7006-60145 Traffic Counts/Studies 8,813.52 101-7006.60427 Safety Gear 266.50 201-7003-60320 Travel & Training 249.00 201-7003-60429 Signs 634.48 201-7003-60433 Paint/Legends 231.34 201-7003-61101 Utilities - Electricity 805.71 202-3004-60116 Pest Control 74.00 202-3004-60691 Repair & Mal ntenance 385.56 202-3004-61101 Utilities - Electricity 3,077.61 202-3006-60116 Pest Control 47.00 215-7004-60431 Materials 57A3 215-7004-61116 Utilities - Electric - Signal 5,728.33 215-7004-61117 Utilities - Electric - Medi 3,034.89 215-7004-61211 Utilities -Water - Media 14,837.05 241-9101-60420 Ope rati ng Su pp lies 24.02 12/2/2016 11:14:10 AM 87 Page 7 of 8 Demand Register Packet: APPK700920 - DA 12/02/16 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 248-0000-60285 Design 2,000.00 401-0000.20600 Retention Payable •4,334.47 401-ODOO-60185 Design 3,253.69 401-0000-60188 Construction 87,904.72 501-0000-60674 Fuel & Oil 1,388.37 501-OD0D-60676 Vehicle Repair & Mainte 96.43 501-ODDO-71103 Cvc Ctr Bldg Repl/Repair 2,883.27 502-0000-60104 Consultants 13,102.50 502-DDDD-60108 Tecbnical 99.99 502-ODW60122 Credit Card Fee 20.00 502-0000-64125 Temporary Agency Semi 4,992.60 502-000 60301 Software licenses 2,850.00 502-DDDD-60420 Operating Supplies 21.59 502-0000.61400 Utilities - Cable 247.91 502-0000.80103 Computers 429.70 503-DODO-71060 Parks 227.20 Grand Total: 280,083.16 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Expense Amount *"None" 188,748.61 14MICT 950.00 141517D 51.18 1516021) 3,202.50 151611CT 255.70 1617TMICT 9.70 201603CT 86,689.32 201603RP 4,334.47 999901D 2,000.00 BREW LQE 2,510.62 6 rand Total: 280,083.16 12/212016 11.,14:10 AM Page 8 of 8 88 Demand Register r-,`4 -'�� City of La Quinta, CA Packet: APPKT00928 - DA 12/09/16 Vendor Name Payment Number Description {Item} Account Name Account Number Amount Fund* 101- GENERAL FUND ACCOUNTEMPS 113245 11/11/16- TEMP TRAFFIC TECH Tern poraryAgency Services 101.6001-60125 512.00 ACCOUNTEMPS 113245 11/11/16- TEMP TRAFFIC TECH Temporary Agency Services 101-6001-60125 IOL40 ALTEC 113246 11/21/16- 1099/W2 FORMS Printing 101-1006-60410 113.35 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE 113247 10/31/16- BLOOD DRAW Blood/Alcohol Testing 101-2001-60174 120.00 ANSAFONE CONTACT CENTS 113248 11/28/16- PM10 ANSWERING SERVICE PM 10 - Dust Control 101-7006-60146 126.87 CADENCE COMMUNICATION 113252 10/20/16- SIT VAC RENTAL HOTLINE Professional Services 101-6001-60103 64.25 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 113255 11/23/16- CITY HALL ASPEN TREE Operating Supplies 101-3008-60420 410.39 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 113255 11/21/16- HARASSMENT PRESENTATIO Training & Education 101-100460321 47.86 CARTER, ANDREA & ASSOCIA 113256 11/16- GEM & PR Advertising 101-3007-60450 700.00 CHAMBER, THE 113257 MONTHLY GEM NEWSLETTER Marketing & Tourism Promo 101-3007-60461 2,916.66 CHAMBER, THE 113257 MONTHLY GEM NEWSLETTER Contract Services 101-1002-60103 8,0p0.00 CIGNA HEALTH CARE 113258 11/16- DENTAL INSURANCE Dental Insurance Pay 101-0000.20943 7,390.28 CIGNA HEALTH CARE 113258 12/16- DENTAL INSURANCE Dental Insurance Pay 101 0000-20943 7,523.20 COACH ELLA VALLEY WATER 113259 12/02/16- WATER SERVICE Utilities - Water -Pioneer Par 101-3005-61207 454.24 COACH ELLA VALLEY WATER 113259 12/02/16- WATER SERVICE PM 10 - Dust Control 101-7006-6U146 362.59 CONSERVE LANDCARE 113261 PARK LANDSCAPE MAINT PR12014-15 Technical 101-3005-60108 29,575.00 DE LA TORRE LETICIA 113262 10/31/16- LQ PARK RENTAL REFUND Miscellaneous Deposits 101-0000.22830 50.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTRU 113263 11/7/16- COURTYARD FLOWERS Landscape Improvements 101-3005-60113 663.01 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTRU 113263 11/7/16- COURTYARD FLOWERS Landscape Improvements 101-3005-60113 137.78 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCH 313264 11/14- SCHOOL OFFICER BP#3 School Officer 101-2D01-60168 16,701.26 EISENHOWER OCCUPATIONA 113265 10/20/16- PRE -EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL Consultants 101-1D04-60104 947.00 FITZPATRICK, KATHLEEN 113266 D9/12/16- SIGN DEPOSIT REFUND Election Deposit 101-GOOD-22835 400.00 GAS COMPANY, THE 113267 10/19-11/18/15- F5 #32 GAS Utilities -Gas 101-2002-61100 38A6 GAS COMPANY, THE 113267 10/19.11/18/16- CITY HALL GAS 5VC Utilities - Gas 101-3008-61100 199,89 HENRY, PAMELA 113269 06/09/16- REFUND OVERPAYMENT Cash Over/Short 101-0000-42300 12.61 HENSON CONSULTING GROU 113270 11/16- ORG. LEADERSHIP CONSULTING Professional Services 101-1004-60103 2,625.00 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & 113272 11/28/16- SALES TAX ANALYSIS Consultants 101-1006-60104 9,490.58 INTERNATIONALASSOCIATIO 113274 11/22/16- IAPMO MEMBERSHIP RENE Membership Dues 101-6003-60351 200.00 IOTA GRIFFIN LLC 113275 12/07/16- RELEASE OF GRADING DEPO Developer Deposits 101-0000-22810 418,987.00 JARVIS COMPANY, THE 113277 11/25/16- CHRISTMAS TREE MAINT Tree Lighting Ceremony 101-3001-60553 1,271,86 LANCE, SOLL, & LUNGHARD L 113279 10/31/16- FY 15/16 AUDIT Auditors 101-1006-60206 311000.00 LLORT VICTORIA 113280 09/23/16- REFUND SIGN DEPOSIT Election Deposit 101-0000-22835 200.00 MAIETTA PAULA 113282 09/23/16- SIGN DEPOSIT REFUND Election Deposit 101-0000-22835 200.00 Matthews Elaine 113283 12/O1/16- RECOGNITION FOR COUNCIL Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 1,188.00 MIMI'S CAFE 113284 12/08/16- WC LUNCHEON Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 239.11 MKO PHOTOGRAPHY 113285 12/06/16-OPEN HOUSE PHOTOGRAPH Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 100.00 MKO PHOTOGRAPHY 113285 12/01/16- PHOTOS WITH SANTA Special Events 101-3001-60149 250.00 OFFICE DEPOT 113288 11/16/16- OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 9.91 OFFICE TEAM 113289 11/25/16- TEMP OFFICE ASSISTANT Temporary Agency Staff 101-6006-60125 504.00 OFFICE TEAM 113289 11/18/16- TEMP OFFICE ASSISTANT Temporary Agency Staff 101-6006-60125 504.00 PROPER SOLUTIONS INC 113291 11/25/16- TEMP ADMIN ASSISTANT Temporary Agency Services 101-1005-60125 279,72 PROPER SOLUTIONS INC 113291 11/25/16- TEMP OFFICE A551STANT Temporary Agency Services 101-6001-60125 142.08 RASA/ERIC NELSON 113293 11/22/16- PLAN CHECK PM- 2016-0005 Map/Plan Checking 101-7002.60183 180.00 RASA/ERIC NELSON 113293 11/22/16- PLAN CHECK LLA-2016.007 Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 475.00 RASA/ERIC NELSON 113293 11/22/16- PLAN CHECK TPM-2016-0003 Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 285.00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF 113294 08/18-09/14/16-SHERIFF PATROL Sheriff - Patrol 101-2001-60161 592,892,51 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF 113294 OR/18-09/14/16- PATROL DEPUTY OT Patrol Deputy Overtime 101-2001.EO162 11,691,59 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF 113294 08/18-09/14/16-TARGET TEAM Target Team 101-2002-60163 160,700.66 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF 113294 08/18-09/14/16- COMMUNITY 5VC OFF Community Services Officer 101-2001-60164 39,937.32 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF 113294 08/18-09/14/16- GANG TASK FORCE Gang Task Force 101-2001-60166 11,675.20 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERI FF 113294 08/18-09/14j16- NARCOTICS TASK FOR Narcotics Task Force 101-2001-60167 5,837.61 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERI FF 113294 08/18-09/14/16- MOTOR OFFICER Motor Officer 101-2001-60169 79,140.75 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF 113294 08/18-09/14/16- DEDICATED SARGEAN Dedicated Sargeant 101-2001-60170 31,949.95 12/8/2016 7:32:49 PM Page 1 of 7 Demand Register Packet: APPKT00928- DA 12/09/16 Vendor Name • Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF 119294 08/18-09/14/16- DEDICATED LIEUTENA Dedicated Lieutenant 101-2001-60171 18,120.00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF 113294 08/18-09/14/16-SHERIFF MILEAGE Sheriff -Mileage 101-2001-60172 36,492.10 RODRIGUEZ GREG 113295 11/15/16- REFUND SIGN DEPOSIT Election Deposit 101-0000-22835 200.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 113296 760923- CITRUS TUNNEL RELEASE Developer Deposits 101-0000-22810 714.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 113296 760922- MCVEIGH CEQA Developer Deposits 101-0000-22810 4,786.18 RUTAN &TUCKER 11-1296 761008-QUAIL RIDGE Developer Deposits 101-0000-22810 409,00 RUTAN & TUCKER 113296 760924-LINDA GUNNETT FPPC Attorney 101-1003-60153 9,294.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 113296 760914- RETAINER MATTER Attorney 101-1003-60153 11,000.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 113296 760915- SILVER ROCK RESORT Attorney 101-1D03-60153 1,969.88 RUTAN & TUCKER 113296 760908- GENERAL Attorney 101-1003-60153 24,941.27 RUTAN & TUCKER 113296 760909- PERSONNEL GENERAL Attorney 101-1003-60153 258,00 RUTAN & TUCKER 113296 760911- CODE ENFORCEMENT Attorney 101-1003-60153 107.50 RUTAN&TUCKER 113296 760916-TELECOMMUNICATI0NS Attorney 101-1003-60153 2,015.91 RUTAN &TUCKER 113296 760912- PUBLIC WORKS Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 1,272.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 113296 760910- LITIGATION GENERAL Attorney/Utigation 101-1003-60154 480.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 113296 760919- 2014 FLOOD CLAIMS LIT Attorney/Litigation 101-2003-60154 504.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 113296 760920- ALVERIZ LIT Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 192,00 RUTAN & TUCKER 113296 760918- GOLD RESERVE CITRUS BOND L Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 991.11 RUTAN & TUCKER 113296 760921- BARTON LIT Attorney/Utigation 101-3003-60154 744.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 113296 760917- SHAATH & OUDETH LIT Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 1,087.20 SERVICE WEAR APPAREL 113297 11/28/16- UNIFORMS Uniforms 101-3008-60690 116.37 SHARK POOLS INC 113298 11/25/16- FB POOL SERVICE Fritz Burns Park 101-3005-60184 488.75 SHARK POOLS INC 113298 11/25/16- FB POOL CHLORINE TABS Fritz Burns Park 201-3005-60184 407.50 SHARK POOLS INC 113298 11/25/16- LQ PARK WATER FEAT LQ Park Building 101-3005-60554 295.00 SHRED -IT USA - 5AN BERNAD 113299 11/15/16- SHREDDING LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 0.41 SIMPLY DELICIOUS 113300 12/06/16- CITY HALL OPEN HOUSE Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 1,800.00 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 113301 11/15/16- CITY HALL REPAIR Materials - Irrigation & Light 101-3005-60424 294,29 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 113302 11/16/16- OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-3005-60400 46.75 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 113302 11/18/16-TONER Office Supplies 101-6001-60400 362.84 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 113302 11/18/16- FIRST AID KIT Safety Gear 101-7006-60427 3217 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 113302 11/20/16- OFFICE SUPPLIES WP5 Citywide Conf Room 5upplie 101.1007-60403 107.98 SYLK, ROBERT R 113304 09/20/16- REFUND SIGN DEPOSIT Election Deposit 101-0000-22835 200.00 TIME WARNER CABLE 113305 11/24-12/23/16-FS#93CABLE Utilities - Cable 101-2002-61400 87A4 TOMAK, GARY L. & JUDITH A 113306 09/22/16- REFUND SIGN DEPOSIT Election Deposit 101-0000-22935 200.00 TRULY NOLEN INC 113308 10/06/16- FS 432 PEST CONTROL Pest Control 101-2002-60116 47.00 TRULY NOLEN INC 113308 11/04/16- FS 1132 PEST CONTROL Pest Control 101-2002-60116 47.00 VACATION RENTAL COMPLIA 113310 SHORT TERM VACATION RENTAL PRGM Professional Services 101-6001-60103 3,600.00 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA) 113311 12/16- VISION INSURANCE Vision Insurance Pay 101-0000-20945 2,584,95 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA) 113311 11/16- VISION INSURANCE Vision Insurance Pay 101-0000-20945 2,508.79 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113313 11/29- CHARGES AND FEES Administration 101.1006-60102 64.67 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113313 11/08- 2016 CSMFO MEMBERSHIP Membership Dues 101-1006-60351 110.00 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113313 11/08- 2016 CSMFO MEMBERSHIP Membership Dues 101-1006-60351 110.00 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113313 11/03- CPR$ MEMBERSHIP Travel & Training 101-3005-60320 85,00 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113313 11102- RETURN Operating Supplies 101-3008-60420 -25.64 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113313 11/02- CALBO TRAINING Travel & Training 101-6006-60320 151.19 WOODRUFF, ALAN 113314 11/28/16- COVE OASIS DEPOSIT REFUN Miscellaneous Deposits 101-0000-22830 200.00 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total: 1,605,925.66 Fund; 201- GAS TAX FUND TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 113307 11/17/16-TRAFFIC SIGNS Signs 201-7003-60429 123.23 TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 113307 11/22/16- PAINT LEGENDS Paint/Legends 201-7003-60433 160.92 TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 113307 11/28/16-SIGNS Signs 201-7003-60429 320.76 TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 113307 11128/16-SCHOOL SPEED LIMITSIGN Signs 201-7003-60429 116.53 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113313 11/16- GAS SUPPLY/COMPRESSED AIR Materials 201-7003-60431 35.46 Fund 201- GAS TAX FUND Total: 756.90 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY FUND CONSERVE LANDCARE 113261 PARK LANDSCAPE MAINT PRJ 2014-15 Landscape Contract 202-3004-60112 1,575.00 CONSERVE LANDCARE 113261 PARK LANDSCAPE MAINT PRJ 2014-15 Landscape Contract 202-3006-60112 1,115.00 CONSERVE LANDCARE 113261 10/15/16- MUSEUM FLOWERS Landscape Contract 202-3006-60112 116,71 GAS COMPANY, THE 113267 10/19-11/18/16- LIBRARY GAS SVC Utilities - Gas 202-3004-61100 53A9 LUXE WATER SOLUTIONS tLC 113281 11/23/16- MUSEUM WATER COOLER Water - Inside 202-300&61200 37.80 12/8/2016 7:32:49 PM Page 2 of 7 90 Demand Register Packet: APPKT00928 - DA 12/09/16 Vendor Name Payment Number Description (item) Account Name - Account Number Amount WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECT 113312 11/23/16- LIBRARY LIGHT Repair & Maintenance 202-3004-60691 886.81 Fund 202 - LIBRARY FUND Total: 3,784.71 Fund: 212 - SLESF (CUPS) FUND RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF 113294 08/18-09/14/16- COPS BURGLARY/THE COPS Burglary/Theft Preven 212-0000-60179 4,103.64 Fund 212 - SLESF (COPS) FUND Total: 4,103.64 Fund: ZIS - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 113259 12/02/16- WATER SERVICE Utilities - Water - Medians 215-7004-61211 401.13 CONSERVE LANDCARE 113261 PARK LANDSCAPE MAINT PRJ 2014-15 Technical 215-7004-60189 7,665.00 HORIZON LIGHTING 113273 CITYWIDE LIGHTING MAINT SVC PRJ LM Consultants 215-7004-60104 6,100.00 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 113301 11/16/16- IRRIGATION MATERIAL Materials 215-7004-60431 21.99 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: 14,188.12 Fund: 218- CV VIOLENT CRIME TASK FORCE JAMES, CAMERON 113276 12/02/16- CGIA CONF REIMB Travel & Training 218-0000-60320 80.00 NEXTEL GANG TASK FORCE 113286 10/12.11/11/16- CELLPHONE SVC Utilities - Telephone 218-D000-61300 35.57 POSTAL ANNEX 113290 11/30/16-11/30/17- MAIL BOX RENT Mail Box Service 218-DOOO-60422 252.96 Fund 218 - CV VIOLENT CRIME TASK FORCE Total: 368.53 Fund: 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADMIN RUTAN & TUCKER 113296 760914- RETAINER MATTER Attorney 237-90D1-60153 11,000.00 Fund 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADM1N Total: 11,000.00 Fund: 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY CAHA, BECKY 113253 11/20/16- HOUSING CONSULTING Professional Services 241-9101-60103 4,200.00 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 113255 11/21/16- WSA LUNCHEON Operating Supplies 241-9101-60420 124.91 LANCE, 5OLL, & LUNG HARD L 113279 10/31/16- FY 15/16 AUDIT Auditors 241-9101-60106 3,150.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 113296 760913- HOUSING AUTHORITY Attorney 241-9101-60153 3,715.91 Fund 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY Total: 11,190.82 Fund: 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS BAKER, MICHAEL INTERNATI 113249 EISENHOWER DRAINAGE PRJ 2015-22B Design 401-OODO-60185 18,610.00 BENGAL ENGINEERING INC 113251 DUNE PALMS WIDENING PRJ 091004-D Design 401-0000-60185 7,555.00 BENGAL ENGINEERING INC 113251 DUNE PALMS BRIDGE LOW WATER CRO Design 401-ODDO-60185 6,599.75 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 113260 11/30/16-CVWD INSPECTION COSTS Technical 401-OODO-60108 1,425,DO HERMANN DESIGN GROUP 1 113271 ON -CALL PLAN CHECK SERVICES Professional Services 401.0000.60103 1,303.03 KRIBBS, BRUCE 113278 11/02/16-ADA RAMPS EISENHOWER/C Contingency 401-0000-60510 4,740.00 NV5 113287 NV5PROFESSIONAL5ERVICESAGREEM Technical 401-OD0G-60108 3,195,00 URBAN HABITAT ENVIRONM 113309 10/11/16- 130#10 FINAL RETENTION 20 Retention Payable 401-OUDO-20600 5,564.92 URBAN HABITAT ENVIRONM 113309 10/11/16- PO#10 FINAL RETENTION 20 Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 8,841.16 URBAN HABITAT ENVIRONM 113309 10/11/16- 130#10 FINAL RETENTION 20 Construction 401.00DD-60188 7,243.23 URBAN HABITAT ENVIRONM 113309 10/11/16- PO#10 FINAL RETENTION 20 Construction 401-O000-60188 4,573.93 Fund 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total: 69,651.02 Fund: 501- EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT RAN AUTO DETAIL 113292 11/13/16- CAR WASHES Car Washes 501-0000-60148 502.00 STONES, CAM AUTOMOTIVE 113303 10/27/16- TRUCK # 76 MAINT Vehicle Repair & Maintenanc SO1-O000-60676 43.22 STONES, CAM AUTOMOTIVE 113303 11/16/16- TRUCK # 67 MAINT Vehicle Repair & Maintenanc 501-0000-60676 48.56 STONES, CAM AUTOMOTIVE 113303 11/18116- TRUCK # 75 MAINT Vehicle Repair & Maintenanc 501-0000-60676 92.54 STONES, CAM AUTOMOTIVE 113303 11/17/16- TRUCK # 44 MAINT Vehicle Repair & Maintenanc 501.0000-60676 72.13 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CAR 113313 11/29- COURTYARD LIGHTING Cvc Ctr Bldg Repl/Repair 501-OODD-71103 2,280.96 Fund 501- EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Total: 3,039.41 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 113254 12/01/16- CONTRACT CHARGES Copiers 502-0000-60662 82&98 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 113254 12/01/16- CONTRACT CHARGES Copiers 502-0000-60662 1,730-23 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total: 2,559.21 Fund: 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FND BATTING CAGES INC 113250 11/30116- SPORTS COMPLEX BATTING Parks 503-ODOD-71060 3,871.70 Fund 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FND Total: 3,871.70 12/8/2016 7:32:49 PM 91 Page j or 7 Demand Register Packet., APPKTW929 - DA 12/09/16 Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 504- INSURANCE FUND HAYWARDTILTON & ROLAPP 113268 12/03/16-12/03/17- CRIME INSURANCE Crime Insurance 504-1010-60446 3,366.00 Fund 504 - INSURANCE FUND Total: 3,366.00 Grand Total: 1,733,705.72 12/8j2016 7.32.49 PIA Page 4 of 7 92 Demand Register Packet: APPKT00928 - DA 12/09/16 Fund Summary Fund 101-GENERAL FUND 201- GAS TAX FUND 202 - LIBRARY FUND 212 - SLESF [COPS] FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 218 - CV VIOLENT CRIME TASK FORCE 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADMIN 241 • HOUSING AUTHORITY 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 501- EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FND 504-INSURANCE FUND Account Number 101-0000.20943 101-D000-20945 101-0000-22810 101-0000-22830 101-0000-22825 101-000D-42300 101-1001-60320 101-1002-60103 101-1003-60153 101-1003-60154 101-1004-60103 101-1004-60104 101-1004-60321 101-1005-60125 101-1005-60400 101-1006-60102 101-1006-60104 101-1006-60106 101-1006-60351 101-1006-60410 101-1007-6040S 101-2001-60109 101-2001.60161 101-2001-60162 101-2001-60163 101-2001-60164 101-2001.60166 101-2001-60167 101-2001-60168 101-2001-60169 101-2001-60170 101-2001-60171 101-2001-60172 101-2001-60174 101-2002-60116 101-2002-61100 101-2002-61400 101-30D1-60553 101-3002-60420 101-3003-60149 101-3005-60108 101-3005-60113 Grand Total: Account Summary Account Name Dental Insurance Pay Vision insurance Pay Developer Deposits Miscellaneous Deposits Election Deposit Cash Over/Short Travel & Training Contract Services Attorney Attorney/Litigation Protessional Services Consultants Training & Education Temporary Agency Servi Office Supplies Administration Consultants Auditors Membership Dues Printing Citywide Conf Roam Sup LQ Pa lice Volunteers Sheriff - Patrol Patrol Deputy Overtime Target Team Community Services Offi Gang Task Force Narcotics Task Force School Officer Motor Officer Dedicated Sargeant Dedicated Lieutenant Sheriff - Mileage Blood/Alcohol Testing Pest Control Utilities - Gas Utilities - Cable Tree Lighting Ceremony Operating Supplies Special Events Technical Landscape Improvement Expense Amount 1,605,825.66 756.90 3,794.71 4,103.64 14,188A2 368.53 11,000.00 11,190.82 69, 651.02 3,039.41 2,559.21 3,871.70 3,366.00 1,733,705.72 Expense Amount 14,913.48 3,093.74 424,895.18 250.00 1,400.00 12.61 3,088.00 8,000.00 49,586.56 5,170.31 2,625.00 847.00 47.86 279.72 9.91 64.67 9,490.58 31, 000.00 220.00 113.35 107.98 0.41 592,892.51 11,691.59 160,700.66 39,937.32 11,675.20 5,837.61 16,701.26 79,140.75 31,949.85 18,120.00 36,492.10 120.00 94.00 38.06 87.94 1,271.86 239.11 250.00 28,575,00 800.79 12/8j2016 7:32:49 PM Page 5 of 7 93 Demand Register Packet: APPKTO0928 - DA 12/09116 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-3005.60184 Fritz Burns Park 896.25 101-3005-60320 Travel & Training 95.00 101-3005-60400 Office Supplies 46.75 101-3005-60424 Materials - Irrigation & L 294.29 101-3005.60554 LR Park Building 295.00 101-3005-61207 Utilities - Water -Pioneer 454.24 101.3007-60450 Advertising 700,00 101-3007-60461 Marketing & Tourism Pr 2,916.66 101-3008.60410 Operating Supplies 384.75 101-3U08-60690 Uniforms 116.37 101-3008-61100 Utilities • Gas 199.89 101-6001-60103 Professional Services 3,664.25 101-6001-60125 Temporary Age ncy5ervi 756A8 101-6001-60400 Office Supplies 362.84' 102-6003-60351 Membership Dues 200.00 101-6006-60125 Temporary Agency Staff 1,008.00 101-6006-60320 Travel & Training 151.19 101.7002-60183 Map/Plan Checking 940.00 101-7006-60146 AM 10 - Dust Control 489.46 101-7006-60427 Safety Gear 32.27 201-7003-60429 Signs 560.52 201-7003-60431 Materials 35.46 201.7003-60433 Paint/Legends 260.92 202-3004 60112 Landscape Contract 1,575.00 202-3004-60691 Repair & Maintenance 886.81 202-3004-61100 Utilities - Gas 53.39 202-3006-60112 Landscape Contract 1,231.71 202-3006-61200 Water- Inside 37.80 212-0000-60179 COPS Burglary/Theft Pre 4,103.64 215-7004-60104 Consultants 6,100.00 215-7004-60189 Technical 7,665.00 215-7004-60431 Materials 21.99 215-7004-61211 Utilities - Water - Media 401.13 218.0000.60320 Travel & Training 80.00 218-0ODD-60422 Mail Box Service 252.96 21MOOD-61300 Utilities -Telephone 35.57 237-9001-60153 Attorney 11,000.00 241-9101-60103 Professional Services 4,200.00 241-9101-60106 Auditors 34150.00 241-9101-60153 Attorney 3,715.91 241-9101-60420 Operating Supplies 124.91 401-0000-20600 Retention Payable 14,406.08 401-0000-60103 Professional Services 1,303.03 401.0000.60108 Technical 4,620.00 401-0000-60185 Design 32,764.75 401-0000-60188 Construction 11,817,16 401-0000-60510 Contingency 4,740.00 501-OODD-60148 Car Washes 502.00 501.0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Mainte 256AS 501-0000-71103 Cvc Ctr Bldg Rep I/Repair 2,280.96 502-0000-60662 Copiers 2,559.21 503-ODOD-71060 Parks 3,871.70 504-1010-60446 Crime Insurance 3,366.00 Grand Total: 1,733,705.72 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Expense Amount "None" 1,239,159.52 12/8/2016 7:32.,49 PM 94 Page 6 of 7 Demand Register Packet: APPKT00928 - DA 12/09116 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Expense Amount 09-012E 418,987.00 091004D 7,555.00 111205D 6,599.75 151602P 1,303.03 151604CT 17,382.08 151604RP 8,841.16 151511T 1,425.00 151612D 18,610,00 16-013E 4,786,18 16-014E 714.00 1617PMPCG 4,740.00 17-006E 408.00 PO1617T 3,195.00 Grand Total: 1,733,705.72 121812016 7:32:49 PM Page 7 of 7 95 City of La Quinta, CA Canceled Payables Vendor Set: 01- Vendor Set 01 Bank: APBNK-APBNK Vendor Number Vendor Name O07447 HENRY, PAMELA Payment Type Payment Number Check 111528 Payable Number: R16151-R Payment Reversal Register APPKTO0923 - DA 12/09j16 Original Payment Date Reversal Date Cancel Pate 06/24/2016 12/05/2016 12105/2016 Desuiptlon Payable Date Due t}ate 06/09/16- REFUND OVERPAYMENT 06/09/2016 06/2412016 Total Vendor Amount -12.61 Payment Amount -12.61 Payable Amount 12.61 12/13/2016 2:44:17 PM •9 Page 1 of 2 Payment Reversal Register Bank Code APBNK Report Total: Packet: APPKT00923 - DA 12/09/16 Bank Cade Summary Canceled Payables Payabtes left To Pay Agatn -12.61 -12.61 Q.DD D.DD Total -12.61 -12.61 12/13/2016 2:44:17 PM 97 Page 2 of 2 M.* City of La Quinta Bank Transactions 11/19/16 - 12/09/16 Wire Transactions Listed below are the wire transfers from 11/19/16 - 12/09/16 Wire Transfers: 11/18/2016 - WIRE TRANSFER - ICMA 11/18/2016 - WIRE TRANSFER - LQCEA 11/22/2016 - WIRE TRANSFER - TASC 11/22/2016 - WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK 12/01/2016 - WIRE TRANSFER - PERS 12/02/2016 - WIRE TRANSFER - PERS HEALTH 12/02/2016 - WIRE TRANSFER - ICMA 12/02/2016 - WIRE TRANSFER - LQCEA 12/06/2016 - WIRE TRANSFER - TASC 12/07/2016 - WIRE TRANSFER - ICMA 12/09/2016 - WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT Attachment 2 $ 4,594.00 $ 391.00 $ 1,251.08 $ 209,953.09 $ 36,057.15 $ 95,426.07 $ 4,594.00 $ 391.00 $ 932.33 $ 50.00 $ 127,650.60 $ 481,290.32 100 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 7 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 20, 2016 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ANNUAL REPORT RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Fiscal Year 2015/16 Art in Public Places Annual Report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Per the Municipal Code, the City must expend or commit fees from the Art in Public Places (APP) program within two years of receipt and monies collected must be accounted for in a separate fund. • An annual review of administrative expenses is required. There were no administrative expenses for 2015/16. • Attachment 1 presents the required analysis; the City has complied with the time limit for expenditure of fees and there are no findings to report. • On December 5, 2016 the Desert Valley Builders Association (DVBA) requested additional time to review the report. DVBA had no comments or clarifying question on the APP report. • The APP report was submitted to the Building Industry Association (BIA) -Riverside Chapter. The City did not receive any correspondence from the BIA regarding this report. FISCAL IMPACT - None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City's APP fund is governed by the Municipal Code. Annually, the City must demonstrate that it has complied with the following: • A determination whether or not the fees have been committed for use within two years of collection. Fees may be used for: ✓ The cost of public art and its installation; ✓ The cost to purchase or lease art sites; 101 ✓ Waterworks, landscaping, lighting and other objects, which are an integral part of the artwork; ✓ Frames, mats, pedestals and other objects necessary for the proper presentation of the artwork; ✓ Walls, pools, landscaping or other architectural or landscape architectural elements necessary for the proper aesthetic and structural placement of the artwork; ✓ Maintaining and repairing artwork; ✓ Administrative expenses to otherwise implement the APP program; ✓ Endowments; and ✓ Art replacement. • Review administrative expenses to ensure they were reasonably assessed to implement this program and that they do not exceed five percent of the total funds in the account on July 1 of any year or $25,000 in any fiscal year. If fees collected are not committed for the aforementioned uses, they are returned to the contributor. Staff analyzed APP fund revenues and expenditures, and no reimbursements are due to contributors. There were no excess administrative costs. During 2015/16, the APP funds were used to purchase the following Civic Center art pieces: • JK Designs Inc. - On the Count of Three bronze sculpture • Bart Aldrich - Beautiful Day, Lost Horizon, and Edge of Forever • Damien Jones - Spirit Guardian Water Feature • Mark Stephenson - Enchanted Oasis • Ricardo Breceda Arroyo -T-Rex, and three Big Horn Sheep Payments were also made toward the Seeley and Jefferson Street roundabout sculptures. The DVBA has reviewed the City's annual APP report and had no comments on expenditures. The APP report was also submitted to the BIA - Riverside Chapter. The City did not receive any correspondence from the BIA regarding this report. ALTERNATIVES As the report is a requirement of the Municipal Code, staff does not recommend an alternative action. Prepared by: Karla Campos, Finance Director Approved by: Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager Attachment: 1. Art in Public Places FY 2015/16 Annual Financial Report 102 City of La Quinta ATTACHMENT 1 Art in Public Places (Fund 270) FY 2015/16 Annual Report The Art in Public Places fund is used to account for fees paid in lieu of acquisition, installation, replacement, maintenance and repair of approved art works at approved sites. The fees are refundable if not expended or committed within two years. Beginning Ending Account Description Fund Balance FY 15/16 Fund Balance Revenues & Other Sources: Developer fees 39,940 Interest income 7,248 Reimbursements Total Sources S 47,187 Expenditures & Other Uses Art Purchases 93,881 Maintenance of Public Art 19,132 Project Administration - Transfers Out for Construction Art Project 50,000 Total Uses 163,012 Total Available $ 682,810 $ (115,825)1 $ 566,985 Two Year Test Using First In First Out Method Beginning Revenues Summary of Funds Fund Balance Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent June 30, 2012 865,493 64,830 60,875 475,325 394,123 June 30, 2013 665,689 53,770 253,573 282,627 183,259 June 30, 2014 677,886 99,190 86,993 271,307 418,776 June 30, 2015 682,810 115,356 110,432 253,768 433,966 June 30, 2016 633,966 47,187 163,012 529,000 (10,859) Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 380,333 $ 674,885 $ 1,812,027 Result: Two Year Spent or Committed Test Met Future commitments for unspent funds are detailed below. lArt in Public Places Expenses and Future Commitments Capital Projects and Expenses FY 15/16 Expenses Committed % Complete % funded with fee Sculpture Restorations and Maintenance 17,806 100% 100% Acknowledgement Plaques and Signs 3,841 100% 100% Veterans Day Event Art Piece Updates 1,240 100% 100% JK Designs Inc. Art Purchase - Civic Center 60,000 100% 100% Herman Design Group - Seeley Roundabout, Count of 3 Art Piece 1,826 100% 100% Bart Aldrich - Civic Center Art Purchase 1,000 100% 100% Damien Jones - Civic Center Art Purchase 4,000 100% 100% Mark Stephenson - Civic Center Art Purchase 4,000 100% 100% Vintage Associates - Seeley Roundabout Maintenance 4,500 100% 100% Ricardo Arroyo - Civic Center Art Purchase 14,800 100% 100% Jefferson Street Roundabout Art Piece and Land 50.000 100% 63% FY 2016/17 Budget for Art Purchases and Maintenance 129,000 2% 100% FY 2016/17 Carryovers for Capital Projects - Dune Palms Bridge 200,000 0% 1 % Shovel Ready Art Projects 200,000 0% TBD Total 163,012 529,000 103 104 City of La Q u i nta CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO.8 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 20, 2016 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FEE REPORT RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the Fiscal Year 2015/16 Development Project Fee Report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Development Impact Fees (DIF) are imposed on new construction to help offset impacts created by new development on City facilities and infrastructure. The State Mitigation Fee Act requires the City to annually report on the receipt and expenditure of DIF for the last five years within 180 days of close of the fiscal year. The City must use, or pledge to use, the developer fees on City facilities and infrastructure within five years of receipt, or present findings if that was not the case. Staff has completed the required analysis (Attachment 1) and in all cases the City has complied with the time limit to expend or commit fees for future projects. On December 5, 2016 the Desert Valley Builders Association (DVBA) requested additional time to review the report. The City responded to comments from the DVBA which subsequently voiced their support of the annual filing. The DIF report was submitted to the Building Industry Association (BIA) - Riverside Chapter. The City did not receive any correspondence from the BIA regarding this report. FISCAL IMPACT - None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City has three developer project fees subject to State requirements: Infrastructure, Quimby, and DIF. Annually, the City reports on the following: Brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund; Amount of fee; Beginning and ending balance of the account or fund; Amount of fees collected and interest earned; Each public improvement on which fees were expended, the amount of expenditures, and total percentage of the cost funded with fees; 105 Approximate construction start date of the public improvement if local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing; Description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the fund, including the public improvement being funded. The City must also report payments received pursuant to development agreements entered into after January 1, 2004. A schedule of development agreement payments received for 2015/16 is attached (Attachment 2). The DVBA has reviewed the City's annual DIF report and the City responded to comments from the DVBA; who afterwards expressed their support of the annual filing. The DIF report was also submitted to the BIA - Riverside Chapter. The City did not receive correspondence from the BIA regarding this report. ALTERNATIVES As the report is required by the State, staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Karla Campos, Finance Director Approved by: Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager Attachments: 1. Development Project Fee Financial Report 2. Development Agreement Payment Report f. 2016 AB 1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Infrastructure fee (Fund 225) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2016 ATTACHMENT 1 The Infrastructure fee fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources, provided through developer fees for the acquisition, construction or improvement of the City's infrastructure as defined in Resolution 89-39. Beginning Ending Account Description Fund Balance FY 1 6 Fund Balance Revenues & Other Sources: Developer fees - Interest income 279 Reimbursements - Total Sources S 279 Expenditures & Other Uses Capital Projects - Project Administration/Intemal Engineering Other - Total Uses 0 Total Available S 23,339 S 279 S 23,618 Year Test First In First Out Method roes Collected Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent roes Collected from 20t2 $ 407,802 $ 774 $ 140,775 $ 252,299 $ 156,278 rues Collected from 2013 267,801 72 244,738 244,738 23,136 rues Collected from 2014 23,136 72 - - 23,208 mes Collected from 2015 23,208 132 23,339 rues Collected from 20t6 22,339 279 22,618 Revenue For Last Five Years 1 $ 1,329 $ 385,513 $ 497,037 Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities Capital Improvement Facilities FY 15/16 Committed % Complete % funded with fee 151603 Eisenhower Dr at Montezuma Roundabout 22,618.00 0% 3% Total S - 107 2016 AB 1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Quimby Fees (Fund 220) Government Code 66000 Calculation EYE 6/30/2016 The City's Quimby Special Revenue Fund is used to account for the accumulation of developer fees received under the provisions of the Quimby Act for park development and improvements. Beginning Ending Account Description Fund Balance FY 15/16 Fund Balance Revenues & Other Sources: Developer fees 15,751 Interest income 64,612 Contributions from property owners - Transfers in - Total Sources 80,364 Expenditures & Other Uses - Transfers out Capital Projects 305,730 Total Uses 305,730 Total Available $ 5,660,033 $ (225,366) $ 5,434,667 Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Beginning Revenues Revenues Collected Fund Balance Collected Expenditures Committed Revenues Collected from 2012 $ 8,422,836 $ 26,622 $ 159,281 $ 8,310,262 Revenues Collected from 2013 8,290,177 38,760 90,471 9,173,609 Revenues Collected from 2014 8,241,870 1,011,747 1,118,651 7,320,215 Revenues Collected from 2015 8,134,965 263,193 2,738,126 5,122,234 Revenues Collected from 2016 5,660,033 1 80,364 1 305,730 5,979,239 Total Revenue For Last Five Years 1 $ 1,420,687 IS 4,412,259 $ 35,905,559 Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities Capital Improvement Facilities FY 15/16 Committed o/ Complete % funded with fee 131402 Miscellaneous Parks ADA Improvements $ 95,298 $ 85,290 86% 33% 131411 Community Center Expansion - Wellness $ 63 $ - 100% 25% 131412 La Quinta Park Restroom Project 7,207 227,521 17% 100% 141501 Sports Complex ADA Improvement Project 178,682 134,659 100% 83% 151609 North La Quints Regional Skate and BMX 7,913 3,392,087 1 % 100% 151611 Cove Trailhead Improvements 16,568 118,432 12% 100% 20t605 Fritz Burns Park Tenis and Pickleball Conversn - 437,250 0% 100% 201703 La Quinta Skate Park Conversn to Basketball Courts 263,000 0% 100% 201303 Fritz Bums Pool Improvements - 1,321,000 0% 1 100% Total 1 $ 305,730 $ 5,979,239 Unspent $ 139,196 (844,672) 1,933,402 3,275,925 (544,572) 108 2016 AB 1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Transportation DIF (Fund 250) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2016 The Transportation Impact Fee developer fee fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources, provided through developer fees for street system improvements needed to handle traffic that will be generated by future development. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 2,842 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 2,842 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 1,745 Office/Hospital Unit $ 4,645 General Commercial 1000 sq ft $ 5,679 Tourist Commercial 1000 sq ft $ 1,590 Golf Course Acre $ 669 Beginning Ending Account Description Fund Balance FY 15/16 Fund Balance Revenues & Other Sources: Developer fees 442,858 Interest income 43,238 Miscellaneous 1,811 Transfers in - Total Sources 487,907 Expenditures & Other Uses - Transfers out Capital Projects 779,896 Total Uses 779,896 Total Available $ 3,763,390 $ (291,989) $ 3,471,401 Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Beginning Fund Revenues Revenues Collected Balance Collected Expenditures Committed Revenues Collected from 2012 $ 3,493,531 $ 431,977 $ 1,303,502 $ 2,851,912 Revenues Collected from 2013 2,622,006 468,764 2,935,185 2,935,185 Revenues Collected from 2014 155,586 1,399,090 35,194 35,194 Revenues Collected from 2015 1,519,482 4,031,623 1,787,715 1,787,715 Revenues Collected from 2016 1 3,763,390 1 487,907 1 779,896 1 61745,168 Total Revenue For Last Five Years 1 1 $ 6,819,362 1 $ 6,841,492 1 $ 14,355,174 Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities Capital Improvement Facilities FY 15/16 Committed % Complete % funded with fee 091002 Madison Street Ave. 50 to Ave. 52 $ 169,156 1,692,218 35% 78% 091004 Dune Palms Road Street Improvements - 525,000 22% 21% 121301 Adams Street Signal & Street Improvements 507,672 572,634 100% 82 % 111205 Dune Palms Bridge Improvement 3,644 165,859 2% 1% 151602 Miles Avenue Median Island Landscaping 29,498 639,422 3% 68% 151603 Eisenhower Drive Roundabout at Montezuma 69,926 359,784 8% 100% 151607 New Traffic Signal (Jefferson @ Dunbar Dr) - 107,500 1 % 50% 201702 New Traffic Signal (Caleo Bay at Ave. 47) 430,000 0% 100% 201801 New Traffic Signal (Wash St. @ Lake La Quinta Dr. 430,000 0% 100% 201803 Ave 50 Bridge Spanning the Evac. Channel 976,750 0% 6% 202001 Two Ln Roundabout (Madison St & Ave. 54) 846,000 0% 100% Total $ 779,896 $ 6,745,168 Unspent $1,073,596 155,586 1,519,482 3,763,390 (3,273,767) 109 2016 AB 1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Parks & Rec DIF (Fund 251) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2016 The Parks & Recreation Impact Fee fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources, provided through developer fees for parks required to serve future development. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 2,048 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 2,048 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 2,048 Beginning Ending Account Description Fund Balance FY 15/16 Fund Balance Revenues & Other Sources: Developer fees 217,088 Interest income 1,089 Miscellaneous Transfers in Total Sources 218,177 Expenditures & Other Uses - Transfers out Capital Projects - Total Uses 0 Total Available $ 140,525 S 218,177 S 358,702 Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Beginning Fund Revenues Revenues Collected Balance Collected Expenditures Committed Revenues Collected from 2012 $ (1,360,842) $ 183,612 $ 6,586 $ 514 Revenues Collected from 2013 (1,193,816) 136,319 4,542 1,458 Revenues Collected from 2014 (1,052,040) 585,784 3,231 1,169 Revenues Collected from 2015 (469,486) 610,919 908 2,592 Revenues Collected from 2016 140,525 218,177 1 - 358,702 Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 1,734,811 1 $ 15,267 $ 364,435 Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities Capital Improvement Facilities FY 15/16 Committed % Complete % funded with fee 201303 Fritz Bums Pool Improvements 358,702 0% 21% 1 otal $ $ 358,702 Unspent $ (1,177,744) (1,048,955) (467,425) 138,841 0 110 2016 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Civic Center DIF (Fund 252) Government Code 66000 Calculation EYE 6/30/2016 The Civic Center Impact Fee fund was used to fund the expansion of the La Quinta Civic Center completed in 2008 to support the City's needs through build out. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 942 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 796 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 447 Office/Hospital Unit $ 373 General Commercial 1000 sq ft $ 373 Tourist Commercial 1000 sq ft $ 363 Golf Course Acre $ 179 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 15/16 Ending Fund Balance Revenues & Other Sources: Developer fees Interest income Miscellaneous Transfers in 109,007 Total Sources 109,0417 Advance Interest Expense 61,546 Total Uses 61,546 Total Available S (7,259,468)1 S 47.460 1 S (7,212,007) Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Beginning Food Revenues Revenues Collected Balance Collected Expenditures Committed Revenues Collected from 2012 $ (7,012,033) $ 82,490 $ 239,948 $ - Revenues Collected from 2013 (7,169,491) 96,322 232,321 4,618 Revenues Collected from 2014 (7,305,489) 224,260 231,261 - Revenues Collected from 2015 (7,312,490) 290,145 237,123 55,277 Revenues Collected from 2016 (7,259,468) 109,007 61,546 - Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 802,225 $ 1,002,199 1 $ 59,896 Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities Capital Improvement Facilities FY 15/16 Committed % Complete % funded with fee Total $ - $ - Unspent $ (7,169,491) (7,310,108) (7,312,490) (7,314,745) (7,212,007) 111 2016 AB 1600 Report La Quints Development Project Fee Report Library DIF (Fund 253) Government Code 66000 Calculation EYE 6/30/2016 The Library Impact Fee fund is used for library facilities required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 344 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 344 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 344 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 15/16 Ending Fund Balance Revenues & Other Sources: Developer fees Interest income Miscellaneous Transfers in 36,464 Total Sources 36,464 Advance Interest Expense 12,686 Total Uses 12,686 Total Available S (1,654,779) $ 23,778 $ (1,631,001) Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Beginning Fund Revenues Revenues Collected Balance Collected Expenditures Committed Revenues Collected from 2012 $ (1,923,779) $ 72,963 $ 9,514 $ 286 Revenues Collected from 2013 (1,860,330) 26,674 7,400 2,000 Revenues Collected from 2014 (1,841,056) 98,333 7,428 2,072 Revenues Collected from 2015 (1,750,152) 103,949 8,577 - Revenues Collected from 2016 (1,654,779) 36,464 12,686 Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 338,383 $ 45,605 1 $ 4,357 Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities Capital Improvement Facilities FY 15/16 Committed % Complete % funded with fee Total 1 $ $ Unspent $(1,860,616) (1,943,056) (1,752,223) (1,654,779) (1,631,001) 112 2016 AB 1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Community Center DIE (Fund 254) Government Code 66000 Calculation EYE 6/30/2016 The Community Center Fee fund is used for community center facilities required to serve future development in La Quints. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 129 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 129 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 129 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 15/16 Ending Fund Balance Revenues & Other Sources: Developer fees Interest income Miscellaneous Transfers in 1,185 13,674 Total Sources 14,859 Advance Interest Expense Total Uses 0 Total Available S 86,780 S 14,859 S 101,639 Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Beginning Fund Revenues Revenues Collected Balance Collected Expenditures Committed Revenues Collected from 2012 $ 1,181,043 $ 18,309 $ $ Revenues Collected from 2013 1,199,352 14,426 Revenues Collected from 2014 1,213,777 39,764 1,206,191 Revenues Collected from 2015 47,350 39,430 - - Revenues Collected from 2016 86,780 14,859 1 - 101,639 Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 126,788 1 $ 1,206,191 $ 101,639 Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities Capital Improvement Facilities FY 15/16 Committed % Complete % funded with fee 201901 X Park Youth Center 101,639 0% 100% Iblal $ S 101,639 Unspent $1,199,352 1,213,777 47,350 86,780 0 113 2016 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Street Maintenance DIF (Fund 255) Government Code 66000 Calculation EYE 6/30/2016 The Street Maintenance Fee fund is used for street maintenance required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 116 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 116 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 71 Office/Hospital Unit $ 190 General Commercial 1000 sq It $ 232 Tourist Commercial 1000 sq ft $ 65 Golf Course Acre $ 27 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 15/16 Ending Fund Balance Revenues & Other Sources: Developer fees Interest income Miscellaneous Transfers in 18,081 4,244 Total Sources 22,325 Advance Interest Expense 16,581 Total Uses 16,581 Total Available $ (1,907,295) $ 5,744 S (1,9111,551) Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Beginning Fund Revenues Revenues Collected Balance Collected Expenditures Committed Revenues Collected from 2012 $ (2,029,180) $ 17,181 $ 9,772 $ 228 Revenues Collected from 2013 (2,021,771) 20,624 8,037 1,963 Revenues Collected from 2014 (2,009,184) 50,422 8,229 1,771 Revenues Collected from 2015 (1,966,991) 69,453 9,757 243 Revenues Collected from 2016 (1,907,295) 22,325 16,581 - Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 180,005 1$ 52,376 1 $ 4,205 Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities Capital Improvement Facilities FY 15/16 Committed % Complete % funded with fee Total $ - $ - Unspent $ (2,021,999) (2,O11,147) (1,968,762) (1,907,538) (1,901,551) 114 2016 AB 1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Park Maintenance DIE (Fund 256) Government Code 66000 Calculation EYE 6/30/2016 The Park Maintenance Fee fund is used for park maintenance required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 40 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 40 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 40 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 15/16 Ending Fund Balance Revenues & Other Sources: Developer fees Interest income Miscellaneous Transfers in 4,240 3 Total Sources 4,243 Transfers Out 4,244 Total Uses 4,244 Total Available S 2 S (1) S 2 Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Beginning Fund Revenues Revenues Collected Balance Collected Expenditures Committed Revenues Collected from 2012 $ 0 $ 4,423 $ 4,423 $ Revenues Collected from 2013 0 3,669 3,668 Revenues Collected from 2014 1 11,502 11,503 Revenues Collected from 2015 1 11,904 11,902 Revenues Collected from 2016 1 2 4,243 1 4,244 Total Revenue For Last Five Years 1$ 35,741 1 $ 35,740 1 $ Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities Capital Improvement Facilities FY 15/16 Committed % Complete % funded with fee Ibtal 1 $ $ Unspent S 1 2 2 115 2016 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Fire Protection DIE (Fund 257) Government Code 66000 Calculation EYE 6/30/2016 The Fire Protection Facilities Fee fund is used for fire protection facilities required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 433 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 366 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 206 Office/Hospital Unit $ 171 General Commercial 1000 sq ft $ 172 Tourist Commercial 1000 sq ft $ 167 Golf Course Acre $ 82 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 15/16 Ending Fund Balancc Revenues & Other Sources: Developer fees Interest income Miscellaneous Transfers in 50,120 Total Sources 50.120 Advance Interest Expense 5.385 Total Uses 5,385 Total Available $ (638,219) $ 44,735 Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Beginning Fund Revenues Revenues Collected Balance Collected Expenditures Committed Revenues Collected from 2012 $ (924,563) $ 15,514 $ 4,593 $ 107 Revenues Collected from 2013 (913,642) 49,375 3,585 1,115 Revenues Collected from 2014 (867,852) 104,615 3,402 98 Revenues Collected from 2015 (766,639) 131,990 3,570 - Revenues Collected from 2016 1 638,219) 50,120 5,385 - Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 351,614 $ 20,535 1 $ 1,320 Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities Capital Improvement Facilities FY 15/16 Committed % Complete % funded with fee Total $ Unspent $(913,749) (868,967) (766,737) (638,219) (593,484) 116 2016 AB 1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Developer Agreement Activity (Fund 217) FYE 6/30/2016 ATTACHMENT 2 The following development agreement payment was received for development agreements entered into after January 1, 2004 in accordance with Government Code Section 65865 Date Project/Purpose Amount Interest Earned Expenses Total 10/9/2006 (Plaza Estado) Fee in lieu of Old Town Parking Requirement $ 110,537 $ 24,462 - $ 134,999 117 118 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 20, 2016 STAFF REPORT BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 1 AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SPEED LIMITS FOR CERTAIN STREETS RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution approving legal speed limits on certain local streets, as recommended in the "Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of La Quinta" dated December 2016 prepared by Willdan Engineering. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • State law requires speed limits be updated via an engineering and traffic survey before a police department may use radar enforcement. • An engineering and traffic survey accounts for: 1) prevailing speed, 2) accident history, and 3) roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the motorist. The survey designated 7 segments for speed limit adjustments. FISCAL IMPACT Purchasing/installing new signs is $5,000; funds are available in the sign budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In order to enforce speed limits using radar, they must be set in accordance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC). Per the CVC, vehicle speeds are determined by the behavior of a majority of drivers during normal driving conditions. Jurisdictions may not establish arbitrary speed limits. Attachment 1 presents speed limits for the City. All speed limits are proposed to remain the same with the exception of the following: Street Segment Posted Proposed Avenue 47 Washington Street to Adams Avenue 40 35 Avenue 60 Madison Street to Monroe Street 55 50 Miles Avenue Washington Street to Jefferson Street 50 45 Monroe Street Avenue 52 to Avenue 54 55 50 Monroe Street Avenue 54 to Airport Boulevard 55 50 Monroe Street Airport Boulevard to Avenue 58 55 50 Monroe Street Avenue 58 to Avenue 60 55 50 The consultant is still analyzing the segment of Avenida Bermudas from Calle Arroba to Calle Tecate. That segment will be brought back to Council at a later date. 119 ALTERNATIVES The Police Department uses radar to enforce speed limits, and an engineering and traffic survey is required for radar enforcement. No alternative is recommended. Prepared by: Ed Wimmer, P.E., Principal Engineer Approved by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., Design and Development Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Speed Limit Map 120 RESOLUTION NO. 2016 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING SPEED LIMITS WHEREAS, the California Vehicle Code authorizes cities to designate and regulate speed zones within their jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it appropriate to designate speed limits on the following local streets to facilitate safe and orderly traffic flow; and WHEREAS, said designation shall be made by resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it appropriate to re -designate speed limits for 54 street segments; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Title 12.20.020 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, an engineering and traffic survey has been performed on certain specified streets; and WHEREAS, the following designated prima facie speed limits are based on the results of the engineering and traffic survey; and Street Segment Speed Limit (mph) Adams Street North City Limit to Fred Waring Drive 40 Adams Street Fred Waring Drive to Miles Avenue 40 Adams Street Highway 111 to Avenue 48 45 Airport Boulevard Madison Street to Monroe Street 50 Avenida Bermudas Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 25 Avenida Bermudas Avenue 52 to Calle Arroba 40 Avenida La Fonda Desert Club Drive to Washington Street 30 Avenida Montezuma Calle Potrero to Calle Ensenada 30 Avenida Montezuma Calle Nogales to Avenida Madero 30 Avenue 47 Washington Street to Adams Street 35 Avenue 48 Washington Street to Adams Street 50 Avenue 48 Adams Street to Dune Palms Road 50 Avenue 48 Dune Palms Road to Jefferson Street 50 Avenue 50 Eisenhower Drive to Washington Street 45 Avenue 50 Washington Street to Jefferson street 50 Avenue 52 Jefferson Street to Madison Street 50 Avenue 52 Madison Street to Monroe Street 50 121 Resolution No. 2016- Designate Speed Limits Adopted: December 20, 2016 Page 2 of 3 Avenue 54 Jefferson Street to Madison Street 55 Avenue 54 Madison Street to Monroe Street 55 Avenue 58 Jefferson Street to Madison Street 50 Avenue 58 Madison Street to Monroe Street 50 Avenue 60 Madison Street to Monroe Street 50 Caleo Bay Drive Avenue 47 to Avenue 48 30 Calle Sinaloa Eisenhower Drive to Avenida Bermudas 40 Calle Tecate Avenida Madero to Avenida Bermudas 35 Desert Club Drive North Cut De Sac to Avenue 52 25 Dune Palms Road Fred Waring Drive to Miles Avenue 45 Dune Palms Road Miles Avenue to Highway 111 45 Dune Palms Road Highway 111 to Avenue 48 45 Eisenhower Drive Washington Street to Calle Tampico 45 Jefferson Street North City Limit to Fred Waring Drive 55 Jefferson Street Fred Waring Drive to Miles Avenue 50 Jefferson Street Westward Ho Drive to Highway 111 55 Jefferson Street Highway 111 to Avenue 48 55 Jefferson Street Avenue 48 to Avenue 50 55 Jefferson Street Avenue 58 to Quarry Lane 30 Madison Street Avenue 50 to Avenue 52 50 Madison Street Avenue 52 to Avenue 54 50 Madison Street Avenue 54 to Avenue 58 50 Madison Street Avenue 58 to Avenue 60 50 Miles Avenue Washington Street to Jefferson Street 45 Monroe Street Avenue 52 to Avenue 54 50 Monroe Street Avenue 54 to Airport Boulevard 50 Monroe Street Airport Boulevard to Avenue 58 50 Monroe Street Avenue 58 to Avenue 60 50 Palms Royale Drive Washington Street to Fred Waring Drive 30 Park Avenue Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 40 Sagebrush Drive Washington Street to Date Palm Drive 25 Washington Street Palm Royale Drive to Fred Waring Drive 50 Washington Street Eisenhower Drive to Avenue 50 50 Washington Street Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 50 Washington Street Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 50 Westward Ho Drive Dune Palms Road to Roadrunner Lane 35 Westward Ho Drive Roadrunner Lane to Jefferson Street 35 122 Resolution No. 2016- Designate Speed Limits Adopted: December 20, 2016 Page 3 of 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: the aforementioned prima facie speed limits are most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and to be reasonably safe. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 201" day of December 2016, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 123 ATTACHMENT 1 DARBY ROAD O N — ,y BLACKH HO D VE \ W WAY LEGEND: t 47 111 ~ SPEED LIMIT MPH 25 c 30 48 = 35 40 _ 45 Z 50 - SH A N E oil 55 IF 50 = CITY LIMITS m W 7 ALLE J Q ON A Z N vv�� a Q H � � Z N I MIN W W W W a 0 AVENUE 54 z w Q CALLE TECATE AIRPORT B UL VA CITY OF LA QUINTA SPEED LIMITS L V UE 58 W w w F Li W F (n Z H V1 O W W O O Q � C Z O AVENUE 60 N.T.S. JAVENUE PREPARED DECEMBER 2016 124 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: DECEMBER 20, 2016 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO (1) MODIFY PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005, INCLUDING THE SITE PLAN, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND LANDSCAPING FOR PLANNING AREAS 2, 3 AND 4 OF THE SILVERROCK SPECIFIC PLAN IN RESPONSE TO APPEAL 2016-0004; AND (2) SUSTAIN FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2014-1003; PROJECT LOCATION - SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 52 AND JEFFERSON STREET RECOMMENDATION Adopt a Resolution to (1) modify the Planning Commission's approval of Site Development Permit 2016-0005 (and related site plan, architectural design and landscaping for planning areas 2, 3, and 4 of the SilverRock Specific Plan; project location - southwest corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street) by adding Condition of Approval CC-1, and (2) sustain the Planning Commission's finding of consistency with Environmental Assessment 2014-1003. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • SilverRock Development Company, LLC (SDC) proposes a Site Development Permit for a 140 room luxury hotel, 29 hotel -branded residences, a spa, a meeting and conference center, and a shared service facility. • On October 25, 2016, the Planning Commission approved Site Development Permit 2016-0005 (SDP). • On November 8, 2016, the Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity, through their counsel Wayne Brechtel (collectively, the appellant), filed an administrative appeal of the Planning Commission decision to approve the SDP and the finding of consistency with Environmental Assessment 2014-1003. FISCAL IMPAC Y The cost to implement the Condition of Approval CC-1 is estimated at $350,000- $450,000; this is the cost to install and maintain temporary fencing for a two year period. Potential future costs would entail constructing permanent fencing, which may be reimbursed in whole or in part by SDC. Staff will obtain bids for a permanent fence as necessary, which will be reviewed by Council. 125 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS SDC (the applicant) submitted the application for the SDP that underlies this appeal. The City has entered into a Purchase, Sale, and Development Agreement and statutory Development Agreement, both dated November 19, 2014 (collectively, the agreements), with SDC that set forth terms and conditions for the sale and development of the undeveloped portions of the SilverRock property (Attachment 1 and 2). The SDP is a proposal for a 140 room luxury hotel, 29 hotel -branded residences, a spa, a meeting and conference center, and a shared service facility in planning areas 2, 3, and 4 of the SilverRock Specific Plan (Attachment 3). The appellant appeals the Planning Commission's approval of the SDP on the grounds that the City must enforce adopted mitigation measures and other contractual requirements under the agreements that will have a temporary or permanent fence (barrier) constructed to protect peninsular bighorn sheep (PBS) prior to the further advancement of the project. The appeal and letter from appellant's counsel is Attachment 4. The project is designed with midcentury modern architecture exhibited by low-rise buildings with clean, sharp horizontal and vertical planes, and large expanses of glass to take advantage of surrounding views. The site areas and development parameters are provided in the Table below (please also see page A-1.0 of Attachment 3). Table 1 SDP 2016-0005 Development Parameters Planning Area # Acres Development Proposed 2 23.6 140 room hotel 13,083 s.f. spa building Restaurant (re -use of the Ahmanson House) 3 13.9 29 luxury -branded residences 4 9.1 7,279 s.f. Meeting Center 34,738 s.f. Conference Center 21,978 s.f. Shared Services Facility The hotel is proposed in Planning Area 2 as a 140 room resort complex arranged in clusters of units around the golf course, accessed by walkways for pedestrian and golf cart use. The hotel lobby and its associated pool area will provide the activity hub for the property, while the hotel units will be separated and remain a quiet enclave. A spa facility will be nestled against the mountains, northwest of the lobby area, and will provide a restful, quiet location for spa services. A luxury -branded residential development consisting of 29 independent residences is proposed in Planning Area 3 and arranged to provide expansive views of the golf course and mountains with access to hotel services. Parking for the residential units is provided within the cul-de-sac, and is not dependent on the central parking area at the conference center. A meeting and conference center (in two building areas) and a shared service facility are proposed north of the hotel in Planning Area 4, and immediately south and adjacent to SilverRock Way. The meeting center is intended to house small, conference 126 room facilities, while the conference center will accommodate larger groups. The shared services facility will provide a centralized "back of house" service facility for all current and future uses on the property. This area also centralizes all the parking for the project. The planting palette incorporates a number of native species, and will blend well with the natural backdrop of the Santa Rosa Mountains and the golf course. The planting palette has been reviewed for consistency with the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) permitted and prohibited planting list, to assure that the project's adjacency to the Santa Rosa Mountains Conservation Area does not introduce inappropriate plant species. On October 25, 2016, the Planning Commission approved the SDP for planning areas 2, 3, and 4 of the SilverRock Specific Plan. After the Planning Commission decision, the appellant filed an appeal to the City Council pursuant to La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.120. Pursuant to that section, the City Council may refuse to consider issues which were not raised by the appellant or another person either by verbal testimony or written correspondence made at or before the time the Planning Commission approved the SDP. Staff recommends, however, that the City Council consider all of the issues raised in the appellant's notice of appeal to fully address the concerns raised and which are covered by the proposed modification to the Planning Commission's decision. All of appellant's issues and staffs responses are addressed under "Staff Analysis of Appeal" (below). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project was reviewed under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Design & Development Department (Department) determined that the application is a "project" as defined by CEQA. However, the Department also found that Environmental Assessment 2014-1003 reviewed amended plans for the SilverRock Specific Plan, and that the currently proposed project is consistent with what was reviewed and approved in 2014. While the appeal references reports about deaths and illness befalling PBS - which City staff takes seriously for purposes of mobilizing a response as part of this appeal - the conditions that gave rise to the mitigation measures and contractual obligations under the agreements to construct a temporary or permanent barrier have not substantially changed since Environmental Assessment 2014-1003 or the related underlying Mitigated Negative Declaration (EA 2002-453 or MND) and related Addendum thereto (EA 2006-568 or 2006 Addendum). Specifically, the conditions that gave rise to mitigation measure of a temporary or permanent 8-foot fence or functional equivalent is based on the mountain toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan to protect PBS from entering non -mountainous portions of the SilverRock property. The mountainous/toe-of-slope condition and buffer/mitigation concept has not changed. No substantial changes have been made to the project when compared to the 2014 analysis, and the previously approved Environmental Assessment 2014-1003, including its mitigation measures and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Attachment 5), will be applied to the currently proposed project, thereby resulting in less than significant impacts to the environment. 127 Furthermore, the proposed Condition of Approval CC-1 for the SDP (the Appeal Condition CC-1), which may be approved by the City Council on appeal pursuant to La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.120(D)(6) and may be incorporated into all of the other conditions of approval attached to the SDP, places further specificity and hard deadlines for the construction of a temporary and permanent 8-foot fence or functional equivalent (barrier) for the protection of PBS. The proposed condition is intended to address the concerns raised in the appeal "by constructing a fence, either temporary or permanent, prior to more sheep deaths occurring[]" and prior to the SilverRock development advancing. Appeal Condition CC-1, if approved by the City Council, furthers the already resulting less than significant impacts to the environment through the mitigation measures attached to the SDP. The proposed text of Appeal Condition CC-1 is Attachment 7. STAFF ANALYSIS OF APPEAL Each of the appellant's grounds for appeal is provided below, along with staffs analysis. Appellant's ground for appeal is underlined, and staffs response is in plain text. The order of the grounds for appeal follows the order in the notice of appeal. Please note that staff has taken into account the whole of the record, including written submittals before and during the Planning Commission meeting, oral testimony, and the attachments to the appeal application. Violation of Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan for allowing take of sheep and failing to build sheep barrier. The appellant states that the City is in violation of the CVMSHCP for failing to take measures to restrict bighorn sheep use of existing urban development. The appeal cites CVMSHCP 8.2.4.1 item 14, which requires the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (CVCC) to determine the location of a barrier to sheep access within two years of receiving a written notice by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW (previously Dept. of Fish and Game)) that PBS are using artificial sources of food or water in unfenced areas of existing urban development near a conservation area. CVMSHCP 8.2.4.1 item 14 also requires that CVCC (or local permittee to the extent it agreed) to cause to be constructed such a barrier within two years of that notice. The conservation areas for PBS are undeveloped portions of La Quinta and depicted in Attachment 6. The City does not concede that it violated the CVMSHCP for allowing (or even causing) an alleged take of PBS or for failing to build a sheep barrier. The City did impose a requirement that construction of a sheep barrier must occur and included SDP Condition of Approval No. 54, consistent with the mitigation measure of EA2014-1003 for the construction of a temporary and permanent fence as follows: If Bighorn Sheep enter into the Project Site, an 8-foot fence (or the functional equivalent) between the development and the hillside shall be constructed. The gaps should be I I centimeters (4.3 inches) or less. If determined necessary, the City shall construct temporary fencing while permanent fencing is constructed. The fence shall not contain gaps in which Bighorn Sheep can be entangled. If the Agency transfers or disposes of any of the property adjacent to the hillside, the 128 Agency shall reserve an easement sufficient for the construction of fencing if needed in the future. In addition, Appeal Condition CC-1 has been prepared for consideration of the administrative appeal with the following benchmarks for the 8-foot high fence construction: Temporary Fencing • Construction bids solicited within 15 business days after the decision on the administrative appeal. • Temporary fencing construction begins within 21 days after an award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder with completion within 30 days. • Temporary fence construction shall be complete prior to issuance of any grading, demolition, construction, or building permit. Permanent Fencing • A permanent fence or functional equivalent shall be constructed prior to the grand opening of the SilverRock Resort, as defined. The anticipated date of the grand opening is May 2019. Sheep fence construction will occur along the portion of the toe -of -slope of the SilverRock development to provide an adequate barrier between PBS in the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area and the artificial sources of food and water at the project site. The fence will adjoin the existing fence constructed by the Coachella Valley Water District along the southwestern portion of the SilverRock development. Furthermore, with respect to the time frame under CVMSHCP 8.2.4.1 item 14 by which CVCC must determine the location of and cause to be constructed a sheep barrier, the efforts to determine the location and cause that construction are underway. City staff anticipates analysis of sheep barrier protection in the City of La Quinta by the CVCC with completion of a draft environmental impact report (EIR) being prepared by CVCC. The EIR will analyze various alternatives for sheep barrier protection that may include barrier locations that do not border the SilverRock development but still would serve to protect PBS from entering the SilverRock property from the mountainous area. If the CVCC adopts an alternative method or location with the EIR, a permanent barrier at SilverRock may not serve to protect PBS. Proposed Condition of Approval CC-1 provides that alternative methods for PBS protection may be used by the City and/or applicant in -lieu of permanent fencing if, upon review of environmental impacts, they are consistent with approvals needed by USFWS, CDFW, and CVCC. If no alternative methods for PBS protection are available or approved by the necessary government agencies with approval authority, the default provision in proposed Condition of Approval CC-1 is to complete the permanent fencing or functional equivalent before the grand opening of the SilverRock Resort. Violation of previous city approvals issued for this project for failing to comply with conditions requiring a sheep barrier. Construction of the planning areas 2, 3, 4 of the SDP has not occurred and is subject to the conditions of approval, including construction of an 8-foot fence for protection of PBS. Also, there have not been violations of the agreements because construction of 129 the identified planning areas has not commenced. The terms and conditions of the agreements ensure compliance by the developer with the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Attachment 5) for the construction of a temporary or permanent fence as part of any development of the SilverRock Resort. Nevertheless, the approval of Appeal Condition CC-1 would establish benchmarks for construction of the required fencing prior to issuance of grading, demolition, construction or building permits. Issuance of permits is anticipated to occur by March 2017 and grading will begin by April 2017 pursuant to the Purchase, Sale and Development Agreement (PSDA). Appeal Condition CC-1 goes above and beyond what is required under the PSDA by having the City immediately begin the process for bidding, awarding, and constructing the 8-foot temporary or permanent fence. Violation of California Environmental Quality Act for failing to supplement the environmental review due to changed conditions and new information. The City included sheep fence construction as a condition of approval of the SDP consistent with environmental mitigation measures for the project. Appeal Condition CC-1 has been prepared for consideration by the Council and establishes benchmarks for immediate fence construction consistent with required measures by the CVMSHCP and written notice provided by the USFWS and the CDFW on February 28, 2014. Furthermore, as discussed above, there have not been changed conditions that require any environmental review beyond that which has already occurred in connection with the project. The conditions that gave rise to the mitigation measures and contractual obligations under the agreements to construct a temporary or permanent barrier have not substantially changed since Environmental Assessment 2014-1003 or the related underlying MND and 2006 Addendum. As identified in the appeal, mitigation measures identified in the MND and 2006 Addendum were based on the following environmental conditions: 1. A mount toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan has been prepared to protect peninsular big horn sheep, and other wildlife, from entering the non - mountainous portion of the site [SilverRock property] proposed for development. The concept plan illustrates a continuous buffer to the toe -of -slope in areas where development could occur adjacent to the mountain edge. The concept plan delineates the location, acreage and native plant species envisioned for the mitigation area. This plan shall be incorporated into the project design and shall be subject to review by the City prior to the issuance of grading permits. A copy of this mountain toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan is available for review at the City of La Quinta Community Development Department. 2. If Bighorn Sheep enter onto the Project Site, an 8-foot fence (or the functional equivalent) between the development and the hillside shall be constructed. The gaps should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less. If determined necessary, the City shall construct temporary fencing while permanent fencing is constructed. The fence shall not contain gaps in which Bighorn Sheep can be entangled. If the Agency [City] transfer or disposes of any of the property adjacent to the hillside, the Agency shall reserve an easement sufficient for the construction of fencing if 130 needed in the future. (MND, pp.16-17, as quoted in appeal p.12; 2006 Addendum, pp.28-29, as quoted in appeal p.14.) Those conditions have not changed. As quoted in the appeal, PBS would enter the project site from mountainous areas at the toe -of -slope, and was again referenced in Environmental Assessment 2014-103 (the 2014 Addendum): Essential habitat of the peninsular bighorn sheep in this area [SilverRock property] was defined by the USFWS to include the Santa Rosa Mountains down to the tow - of -slope. As no development was proposed to infringe above the toe -of -slope, no portion of the 2002 MND Project Site would have been developed in the essential peninsular bighorn sheep habitat. Nonetheless, mitigation measures were identified for the 2002 MND Project should peninsular bighorn sheep encroach on the 2002 MND Project Site. (EA 2014-103, as quoted in appeal p.15.) In sum, the conditions that gave rise to mitigation measure of a temporary or permanent 8-foot fence or functional equivalent is based on the mountain toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan to protect PBS from entering non -mountainous portions of the SilverRock property. The mountainous/toe-of-slope condition and buffer/mitigation concept has not changed. No substantial changes have been made to the project when compared to the 2014 analysis, or for that matter the MND and 2006 Addendum. Violation of California Environmental Quality Act for failing to enforce mitigation measures requiring sheep barrier The appeal states that the City is the agency responsible for ensuring compliance with mitigation measures for constructing the fence during project implementation. The City recognizes that the applicant has obligations for the construction of a temporary or permanent fence as part of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the SilverRock Resort and under the agreements. However, CVCC is the agency responsible for ensuring compliance with the CVMSHCP to the extent a barrier (8-foot fence or functional equivalent) goes beyond the SilverRock property. In this regard, the City is aware that CVCC is preparing the EIR for protection of PBS for areas in the City of La Quinta including the toe -of -slope along the project site, and staff is of the understanding that the EIR will analyze alternative methods for protection of PBS that may include alternative barrier locations where the CVCC has the ability to obtain permission/access to the necessary lands, and any such alternative method(s) is approved by USFWS, CDFW, and CVCC. For purposes of the SilverRock property and mitigation measures that apply to SilverRock, the City has complied with CEQA requirements to have the temporary or permanent fence integrated into any development of the SilverRock Resort under the SDP as approved by the Planning Commission. Nevertheless, as described above, Appeal Condition CC-1 goes beyond the mitigation measures that reduce environmental impacts to less than significant levels by giving further specificity for the construction of a temporary sheep fence to begin immediately, should the City Council modify the SDP by adding Appeal Condition CC-1. Additionally, Appeal Condition CC-1 gives further specificity as to the deadline by which a permanent fence must be completed if no other feasible alternatives are allowed by USFWS, CDFW, and CVCC. 131 Violations of fully protected mammal act for allowing take of sheep No take of sheep occurred with the approval of the SilverRock Specific Plan and EA 2002-453, EA 2006-568, or EA 2014-1003, which included mitigation measures for protection of bighorn sheep and did not require construction of a sheep barrier prior to any improvements related to the development of the Specific Plan. SDP Condition of Approval No. 54 requires construction of the sheep fence as part of the proposed development of planning areas 2, 3, and 4. Moreover, approval of Appeal Condition CC-1 will ensure immediate construction of the fencing and address the primary concern of the appellant: The construction of a fence, either temporary or permanent, be completed prior to more sheep deaths occurring. While proposed Appeal Conditions CC- 1 could immediately assist with curbing a potential take of PBS, the City does not concede that the lack of a temporary or permanent fence at SilverRock, or any action taken or not taken by the City in connection with SilverRock property, caused an alleged take of PBS. Violations with endangered species act for allowing taking of sheep No take of sheep occurred with the approval of the SilverRock Specific Plan and EA 2002-453, EA 2006-568, or EA 2014-1003, which included mitigation measures for protection of bighorn sheep and did not require construction of a sheep barrier prior to any improvements related to the development of the Specific Plan. SDP Condition of Approval No. 54 requires construction of the sheep fence as part of the proposed development of planning areas 2, 3, and 4. Moreover, approval of Appeal Condition CC-1 will ensure immediate construction of the fencing and address the primary concern of the appellant: The construction of a fence, either temporary or permanent, be completed prior to more sheep deaths occurring. While proposed Appeal Conditions CC- 1 could immediately assist with curbing a potential take of PBS, the City does not concede that the lack of a temporary or permanent fence at SilverRock, or any action taken or not taken by the City in connection with SilverRock property, caused an alleged take of PBS. Violation of the public trust The appeal curtly references a violation of the public trust without background information or analysis explaining the grounds for any alleged violation. Regardless, the City did not violate the public trust because it did not authorize any take of PBS with the approval of the SDP. Also, as discussed above, no take of sheep occurred with the approval of the SilverRock Specific Plan and EA 2002-453, EA 2006-568, or EA 2014- 1003, which included mitigation measures for protection of PBS and did not require construction of a sheep barrier prior to any improvements related to the development of the Specific Plan. SDP Condition of Approval No. 54 requires construction of the sheep fence as part of the proposed development of planning areas 2, 3, and 4. Moreover, approval of Appeal Condition CC-1 will ensure immediate construction of the fencing and address the primary concern of the appellant: The construction of a fence, either temporary or permanent, be completed prior to more sheep deaths occurring. While proposed Appeal Conditions CC-1 could immediately assist with curbing a potential take of PBS, the City does not concede that the lack of a temporary or permanent fence at 132 SilverRock, or any action taken or not taken by the City in connection with SilverRock property, caused an alleged take of PBS. AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW Public Agency Review The applicant's request for the SDP was sent to all applicable City departments and affected public agencies on May 31, 2016. The appellant's notice of appeal was received by the City Clerk and sent to all applicable City departments. All written comments received at the Planning Commission and City Council appeal will be or are on file and available for review with the Design and Development Department. Planning Commission Review At its regular meeting of October 25, 2016, the Planning Commission heard testimony and approved the SDP with attached conditions of approval and finding of consistency with Environmental Assessment 2014-1003. City Council Review Pursuant to La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.120(D)(6)(a), the City Council may modify the Planning Commission's decision for the SDP, without referring the SDP back to the Planning Commission, by adding and incorporating by reference Appeal Condition CC-1 with all other conditions of approval and actions taken by the Planning Commission. ALTERNATIVES Pursuant to La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.120(D)(6), the City Council may: • Sustain or reverse the Planning Commission decision without modification. • Continue this appeal for further consideration. • Refer the application back to the Planning Commission with directions. Prepared by: Gabriel Perez, Planning Manager Approved by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., Design and Development Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1. Project Information Form 2. Project Area Site Map 3. Site Development Permit Plan Set 4. Appeal application from Wayne Bechtel dated November 8, 2016 5. SilverRock Resort Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 6. Map of Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Conservation Areas 7. Proposed Condition of Approval CC-1 for Site Dev. Permit 2016- 0005 133 134 RESOLUTION 2016 — A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 140 ROOM HOTEL, SPA, 29 HOTEL -BRANDED RESIDENCES, A MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER AND SHARED SERVICES FACILITY WITHIN THE SILVERROCK SPECIFIC PLAN BY ADDING CONDITION OF APPROVAL CC-1 AND SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMISSION'S FINDING OF CONSISTENCY WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2014-1003 CASE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 APPELANT: WAYNE BRECHTEL WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 25th day of October, 2016, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by SilverRock Development Company, LLC, for approval of a hotel, spa, conference center and shared services facility generally located on the southwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 52, more particularly described as: APN: 776-150-022, 777-490-011, 770-200-026, 776-150-021, 776-150-023, 777-490-007, 777-490-001, 777-490-012, 777-490-014, 777-490-018 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 14, 2016 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 20th day of December, 2016, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider an appeal by Mr. Wayne Brechtel of SDP2016-0005. WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.010 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of said Site Development Permit: 1. Consistency with General Plan and SilverRock Specific Plan The land use is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Tourist Commercial. The proposed project is also consistent with the SilverRock Specific Plan, and implements the goals, policies and development standards of the Specific Plan. 135 City Council Resolution 2016 - Appeal 2016-004 of Site Development Permit 2016-0005 Adopted: Page 2 of 4 2. Consistency with Zoning Code The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the development standards of the City's Zoning Code and/or SilverRock Specific Plan, as applicable. The Site Development Permit has been conditioned to ensure compliance with the zoning standards and other supplemental standards as established in Title 9 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. 3. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) The Design and Development Department has determined that this project is consistent with Environmental Assessment 2014-1003 and no further environmental review is required. 4. Architectural Design The architectural design of the project, including, but not limited to, the architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, and roof style are compatible with the architectural guidelines of the SilverRock Specific Plan and the quality of design prevalent in the city. 5. Site Design The site design of the project, including, but not limited to, project entries, interior circulation, pedestrian and bicycle access, pedestrian amenities, screening of equipment and trash enclosures, and exterior lighting, are consistent with the SilverRock Specific Plan and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. 6. Landscape Design Project landscaping, including, but not limited to, the location type, size, color, texture and coverage of plant materials, has been designed so as to provide visual relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses and between development and open space, and enhance the visual continuity of the project. The landscape design will be consistent with the established landscape guidelines for the SilverRock Specific Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 136 City Council Resolution 2016 - Appeal 2016-004 of Site Development Permit 2016-0005 Adopted: Page 3 of 4 SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case. SECTION 2. That it does hereby sustain the Planning Commission's determination that Site Development Permit 2016-005 is consistent with Environmental Assessment 2014-1003. SECTION 3. That it does hereby modifies the Planning Commission's decision approving Site Development Permit 2016-0005, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval and Exhibit A. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on this the 20th day of December, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: 137 City Council Resolution 2016 - Appeal 2016-004 of Site Development Permit 2016-0005 Adopted: Page 4 of 4 WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 138 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 1 of 17 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: Riverside County Fire Marshal La Quinta Public Works Development Division (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP) Exemption Form - Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) Design & Development Department Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department Desert Sands Unified School District Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) Imperial Irrigation District (IID) California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) State Water Resources Control Board SunLine Transit Agency SCAQMD Coachella Valley The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 3. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant; who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City 139 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 2 of 17 prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 4. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2012- 0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 140 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 3 of 17 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. F. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City. G. The inclusion in the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post - construction BMPs as required; and the applicant shall execute and record an agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs is required. 5. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 6. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 7. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. Said 141 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 4 of 17 conferred rights shall also include grant of access easement to the City of La Quinta for the purpose of graffiti removal by City staff or assigned agent in perpetuity and agreement to the method to remove graffiti and to paint over to best match existing. The applicant shall establish the aforementioned requirements in the CC&R's for the development or other agreements as approved by the City Engineer. 8. Pursuant to the aforementioned condition, conferred rights shall include property rights necessary for construction and proper functioning of the proposed development not limited to access rights over proposed and/or existing private streets that access public streets and open space/drainage facilities. 9. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 10. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street rights -of - way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 11. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan and provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access For Individual Properties and Development) for public streets. A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Construct right turn deceleration lane at all access points where there is a peak hour right -turn volume of 50vph. The deceleration lane length shall be as specified in Engineering Bulletin 06-13. 2) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) - Construct a traffic signal or roundabout at the project entrance off Jefferson Street at such time that warrants are met. PARKING LOTS and ACCESS POINTS 12. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in 142 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 5 of 17 particular the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans so that ADA accessibility issues can be evaluated. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking stall lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 18 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for all parking stalls or as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible handicapped parking stall is required per 6 handicapped parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking stalls shall be a minimum of 26 feet with access drive aisles to Public Streets a minimum of 30 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. A minimum of 20 feet on each side of approach drives shall be provided where divided by median islands and as approved by the City Engineer. 13. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Major Arterial Residential 5.5" a.c./6.5" c.a.b. 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c./5.5" c.a.b. Loading Areas 6" P.C.C./4" c.a.b. 143 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 6 of 17 or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 14. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 15. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. 16. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refers to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 17. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 18. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Design and Development Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On -Site Mass Grading Plan 1" = 100' Horizontal 144 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 7 of 17 B. On -Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal C. PM10 Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal D. Final WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently. E. On -Site Street Improvements/ Signing & Striping/ Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1"= 4' Vertical (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) F. On -Site Commercial Precise Grading 1" = 20' Horizontal (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. "On -Site Commercial Precise Grading" plan is required to be submitted for approval by the Building Official, Planning Manager and the City Engineer. "On -Site Commercial Precise Grading" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements. All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. 145 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 8 of 17 19. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the Public Works "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" section of the City website (www.la-quinta.org). Please navigate to the Public Works home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 20. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the mylars of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. 21. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. r,RQnrNC, 22. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 23. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 24. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a professional 146 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 9 of 17 registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls), and E. A WQMP prepared by an authorized professional registered in the State of California, and F. A grading bond in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the grading bond requirements. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 25. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 26. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition requirement. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6') of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be 147 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 10 of 17 depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 27. Building pad elevations on the precise grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the Site Development Permit Preliminary Grading Plans, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. 28. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus five tenths of a foot (0.5') from the elevations shown on the Site Development Permit Preliminary Grading Plans, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Staff for a substantial conformance finding review. 29. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. 30. This development shall comply with LQMC Chapter 8.11 (Flood Hazard Regulations). If any portion of any proposed building lot in the development is or may be located within a flood hazard area as identified on the City's Flood Insurance Rate Maps, the development shall be graded to ensure that all floors and exterior fill (at the foundation) are above the level of the project (100-year) flood and building pads are compacted to 95% Proctor Density as required in Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 65.5(a) (6). Prior to issuance of building permits for lots which are so located, the applicant shall furnish elevation certifications, as required by FEMA, that the above conditions have been met. DRAINAGE 31. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for SDP 2016-0001 SilverRock. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 148 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 11 of 17 32. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1-hour, 3-hour, 6-hour or 24-hour event producing the greatest total run off. 33. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 34. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. 35. For on -site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin or as approved by the City Engineer. 36. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 37. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 149 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 12 of 17 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ. A. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB- CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. UTILITIES 38. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 39. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 40. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 41. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall complywith 150 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 13 of 17 trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 42. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have parking lot improvements and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 43. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 44. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, and common lots. 45. All new landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 46. The applicant shall submit final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Design and Development Director approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Director determines extenuating circumstances exist which justify an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Design and Development Director. 151 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 14 of 17 Prior to final approval of the installation of landscaping, the Landscape Architect of record shall provide the Design and Development Department a letter stating he/she has personally inspected the installation and that it conforms with the final landscaping plans as approved by the City. If staff determines during final landscaping inspection that adjustments are required in order to meet the intent of the Planning Commission's approval, the Design and Development Director shall review and approve any such revisions to the landscape plan. 47. All trees shall consist of, at minimum, 36-inch box trees (i.e., a minimum 2.5 inch caliper measured three feet up from grade level after planting), 5-gallon shrubs, and groundcover. Double lodge poles (two-inch diameter) shall be used to brace and stake trees. 48. A minimum of 50% of plantings classified "Shrubs, Perennials and Annuals" shall be provided as 5-gallon plants. This requirement shall be implemented on each Final Landscaping Plan submitted for review and approval to the City. MAINTENANCE 49. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 50. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, sidewalks, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 51. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 52. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 152 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 15 of 17 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT 53. All mitigation measures included in Environmental Assessment 2014-1003 shall apply to this project. 54. If Bighorn Sheep enter into the Project Site, an 8-foot fence (or the functional equivalent) between the development and the hillside shall be constructed. The gaps should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less. If determined necessary, the City shall construct temporary fencing while permanent fencing is constructed. The fence shall not contain gaps in which Bighorn Sheep can be entangled. If the Agency transfers or disposes of any of the property adjacent to the hillside, the Agency shall reserve an easement sufficient for the construction of fencing if needed in the future. FIRE DEPARTMENT 55. Developer shall provide 20 foot Fire Department access to hotel guest rooms and spa buildings. Access shall comply with CFC Chapter 5 and Riverside County Code 787. 56. The Final Landscape Plan shall not include Texas Honey Mesquite (Prosopis Glandulosa) as a planting option for canopy or accent trees. Appeal Condition of Approval CC-1 A. City Council Authority. This condition to modify the original decision of the Planning Commission for Site Development Permit 2016-0005 is binding on the City pursuant to its police power and applicant pursuant to Section 9.200.120(D)(6) of the La Quinta Municipal Code and shall take effect immediately upon its adoption as part of the Appeal of Planning Commission Decision, Case No. Appeal 2016-0004 (Administrative Appeal). This condition is incorporated into the approval for Site Development Permit 2016-005 by this reference, and all other conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission for Site Development Permit 2016-0005 remain in full force and effect. B. Intent. The intent of this condition is to protect Peninsular Big Horn Sheep for the approximately 525 acres of property known as The SilverRock Resort pursuant to the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Communities Conservation Plan (MSHCP), the Mitigation Monitoring Program included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Addendum for the SilverRock Resort Specific Plan (SRR Mitigation Measures), that certain Development Agreement dated November 19, 2014, by 153 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 16 of 17 and between the SilverRock Development Company, LLC (Developer) and the City (the DA), and that certain Purchase, Sale, and Development Agreement dated November 19, 2014, by and between Developer and the City (the PSDA). C. Immediate Construction of Temporary Fencing. Within 15 days after the decision of the hearing of the Administrative Appeal, the City shall solicit bids for the construction of temporary fencing. Within 21 days after the award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, construction of the temporary fencing shall commence. The completion of construction for the temporary fencing shall be as soon as possible after commencing construction, not to exceed a period of 30 days for total construction. Prior to the issuance of any grading, demolition, construction, or building permit, the construction of the temporary fencing shall be completed. For purposes of this condition, "temporary fencing" or "temporary fence" means an 8-foot high fence between the SilverRock Resort development and hillside as identified in the SilverRock Resort Fence Location Site Plan attached as Exhibit "A" to this condition and incorporated by reference (Fencing Site Plan). The temporary fencing shall have gaps that should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less, and shall not contain gaps in which Big Horn Sheep can be entangled. If and/or when the City transfers or disposes of any of the SilverRock Resort property adjacent to the hillside to the applicant, the City shall reserve an easement, and the applicant shall grant an easement, sufficient for the construction and maintenance of the temporary fencing until such time as the permanent fencing or functional equivalent (as described below) is completed. The temporary fencing on City - owned property at SilverRock Resort shall be maintained by the City and on Developer - owned property shall be maintained by Developer until such time as the permanent fencing or functional equivalent is completed. D. Construction of Permanent Fencing or Functional Equivalent. Prior to the issuance of a "grand opening" of the SilverRock Resort as improved pursuant to the DA and PSDA, construction of the permanent fencing or functional equivalent shall be completed. For purposes of this condition, "permanent fencing or functional equivalent" or "permanent fence" means an 8-foot high fence or other barrier that prevents Big Horn Sheep from accessing SilverRock Resort, constructed of durable material or natural landscaping elements approved by the City and applicant in a location that, upon completion of construction, will be within 1-10 feet of the temporary fence line as identified on the Fencing Site Plan. The permanent fence shall have gaps that should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less, and shall not contain gaps in which Big Horn Sheep can be entangled. If and/or when the City transfers or disposes of any of the SilverRock Resort property adjacent to the hillside to the applicant, the City shall reserve an easement, and the applicant shall grant an easement, sufficient for access to and (if necessary, construction 154 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 17 of 17 of and maintenance of) the permanent fence. The permanent fence on City -owned property at SilverRock Resort shall be maintained by the City and on Developer -owned property shall be maintained by Developer. For purposes of this condition, "grand opening" of the SilverRock Resort means the opening to the general public of the new resort improvements consisting of the Luxury Hotel, Lifestyle Hotel, Conference and Shared Service Facility, Resort Residential Village, and dwelling unit that are part of the Luxury Branded Residential Development, Lifestyle Branded Residential Development, Promenade Mixed -Use Development, or Resort Residential Village (all as those terms are defined in the PSDA). The anticipated date of the grand opening for reference purposes only is May 2019. E. Periodic Review for Environmental Impacts. After the completion of construction of the temporary fencing and until the completion of construction of the permanent fence, the City and applicant shall coordinate with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and/or Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (collectively, the other governmental agencies) to review the effectiveness of the temporary fencing or permanent fencing (or functional equivalent). If review of environmental impacts advocates for a relocation of the temporary fencing or permanent fencing (or functional equivalent) to protect Big Horn Sheep, that review and relocation may be considered and used by the City and/or the applicant if they are consistent with any and all approvals from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and/or Coachella Valley Conservation Commission. F. Enforcement. This "CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL 2016- 0004, SRR SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 ("Appeal Condition") may be enforced by the Appellants Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity. Enforcement shall be limited to an action in Superior Court to compel performance. 155 156 Attachment A: SilverRock Temporary Chain Link Fence Tradition to CVWD Canal `'. � :Y �' tea• `�� .. ..,.. _ • 4 M �, M ,-I� �kd. - C h ty� �� . i �yy �pr�`+r. •: �' �' d 'y`7,. F+t3•� i.MN. '.{.'1 � �,�`'�t�y � '� '•:. ..� r 1, y . ry ^ r - 4 .., .a "" - - ✓ i rr x, >r h i7-. � �* '.�� I " K� x: ,�•� ,';. .r - . , v;t , 't .ttA i ,, . ... t '. v(. r,%.. !{,,. t�:.J. •..: M.-. .:. xP- . .. .. A, q.. .:7 ....- r, ,. r'. .L �,:,i� �S �t �f. - _ Y _ � - 't.,�{ Ali" p•• i , ., :.i... ..?."��Y 11<. '",y �,. 6- �h�'S ��.; v� {. � f �.. G _.',i�. r -,'. '�„% w yr . I i• \.f 4Aa i �, %. � f ':'ji }�� z }SI oil �, �" � •� y.: i�� j;t ''`4i •i_�t 'A». Y!':'1 L :tr'`; l k ):r� ' 'IMPORTANT* Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the R�,T source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of the user. 0 632 1,265 Feet REPORT PRINTED ON... 11/22/2016 8:58:09 AM © Riverside County RCIT GIS l — — — —. —. Legend ❑ Display Parcels roadsanno highways HWY INTERCHANGE INTERSTATE OFFRAMP ONRAMP USHWY i-i counties cities hydrographylines waterbodies Lakes Rivers ATTACHMENT 1 Project Information CASE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 APPLICANT: SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF LA QUINTA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: BURTON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE STUDIO ARCHITECT: GENSLER REQUEST: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005, INCLUDING THE SITE PLAN, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND LANDSCAPING FOR PLANNING AREAS 2, 3 AND 4 OF THE SILVERROCK SPECIFIC PLAN. LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND AVENUE 52 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: TOURIST COMMERCIAL, OPEN SPACE - RECREATION ZONING DESIGNATION: TOURIST COMMERCIAL, GOLF COURSE SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USES: NORTH: GOLF COURSE (WITHIN THE SILVERROCK PROJECT) SOUTH: GOLF COURSE (WITHIN THE SILVERROCK PROJECT) WEST: OPEN SPACE (SANTA ROSA MOUTAINS) EAST: GOLF COURSE (WITHIN THE SILVERROCK PROJECT) 158 ATTACHMENT 2 Attachment 2 Project Area Site Map SDP2016-0005 159 160 ATTACHMENT 3 SilverRock Development Company, LLC SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 PA-2. 3 & 4 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 10-18-2016 55.7598.000 SilverRock Development Company, LLC DEVELOPER 3551 Fortuna Ranch Road Encinitas, CA 92024 Telephone: 760.634.6543 Gensler ARCHITECT 225 Broadway Suite 1600 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619.557.2500 Michael Baker International CIVIL ENGINEER 75-410 Gerald Ford Drive Suite 100 Palm Desert, CA 92211 Telephone: 760.346.7481 Burton Landscape Architecture Studio LANDSCAPE 307 S. Cedros Ave. Solana Beach, CA 92075 Telephone: 858.794.7204 Glumac LIGHTING ENGINEER 18200 Von Karman Ave. Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92612-1029 Telephone: 949.833.8190 Melia Homes RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECT 8951 Research Drive Irvine, CA 92618 Telephone: 949.759.4367 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 161 VICINITY MAP '.-a�•' � JaMgrar liar - - -- � I A+uMunQf • I I ,• � �� - . SilverR+ack Specific " Plan Area F_ - - L SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES 79-179 AHMANSON LANE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT CODES AND REGULATIONS 2013 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PART 1, TITLE 24, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR) 2013 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE PART 2, TITLE 24, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR) (2009 ISO AND 2010 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) 2013 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE PART 3, TITLE 24, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR) 2008 NEC AND 2610 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) ) 2013 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE PART 4, TITLE 24, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR) (2009 UMC AND 2010 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) 2013 CALFORNIA PLUMBING CODE PART 5, TIRE 24, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR) (2009 UPC AND 2010 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) 2013 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE PART 9, TIRE 24, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR) (20091FC AND 2010 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) NFPA 101 (LIFE SAFETY CODE), 2013 EDITION NFPA 72 (NATIONAL FIRE ALARM AND SIGNALING CODE), 2013 EDITION PARKING CALCULATIONS 20:731C10I. Rl00ilga10ATNIl99g1-\J IavlasmIT, IORI LAND USE REQUIRED PROVIDED NOTES HOTEL UNITS 268 269 SP REQUIREMENTS: 1/KEY FIRST 50 ROOMS. 7&KEY OVER 50 ROOMS. 340 KEYS. HOTEL F& B 97 97 V5 SEATS. 205 SEATS LUXURY HOTEL. 278 SEATS LIFESTYLE HOTEL. HOTEL EMPLOYEE 189 PARKING - CONFERENCE CENTER 350 SHAREDSERVICES PA 3 PA 2 �PA 4 94,000 SF 255,000 SF 189,000 SF IMPERMEABLE IMPERMEABLE IMPERMEABLE SURFACE SURFACE SURFACE\ \ SILVERROCK WAY_ a oocto5o9 � ' atootoa �d'o oa A 7 HARDSCAPE VS PERMEABLE SURFACE SCALE: 1"=400'-0" GOLFCOURSE 90 FUTURE GOLF 45 PRACTICE RANGE 20 TOTAL MASTERPLAN 1,059 DEVELOPMENT ADA PARKING SPACES 21 IN TOTAL PROJECT DATA 189 5 SPACES PER 378 MAX DAILY SHIFT EMPLOYEES. 351 CREDIT 30 SF/GUEST UNIT. THEREAFTER 1 SPACE PER 30 SF OF MTG AREA. 20,473 SF MTG AREA. 90 SP REQUIREMENT-18 HOLES:5 STALL3IHOLE 45 SP REQUIREMENT HOLES'.5 STALLSIHOLE. 20 IIPRACTICE RANGE TEE, 1,061 21 21 SPACES INCLUDED (4 OF WHICH ARE VAN) MASTERPLAN PARKING CALCULATIONS (ABOVE); 1 FOR EACH 100, OR FRACTION THEREOF, OVER 1000. PROJECT DATA CONTINUED BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE 11-LUXURY HOTEL. AND PERCENT OF SITE AREA: HS - HOTEL SPA: GR- GUESTROOMS: 140 ROOMS GR1: GR2: GR3: GR4: GR- GUESTROOMS(TOTAL)c PARKINGIIMPERMEABLE AREA: LANDSCAPEAREA: MC - MEETING CENTER: CC- CONFERENCE CENTER: SS- SHARED SERVICES: PARKINGIIMPERMEABLE AREA: LANDSCAPEAREA R1 -29 LUXURY RESIDENCES PARKINGIIMPERMEABLE AREA. LANDSCAPEAREA: 23,960 SFN.55 AC 2.35%OF PA2SITE 13,083 SFN.30 AC 1,27%OF PA2 SITE 76,444 SF/1.75 AC 742 742%OFPA2SITE 7,065 SR0 069%OFPA2SITE FPo6A 0.35%OFPA2SITE355SF5522 ,AC 0.54%OF PA SITE 92,589 SF/2.13 AC 8.99%OF PA2 SITE 255,000 SF/5.65AC 24.76%OF PA 2 SITE 644,983 SF/14.81 AC 62.63%OF PA 2 SITE 7,279 SFICA 7 AC 1.85%OF PA4 SITE 34,738 SFro80 AC 8.81%OF PA4 SITE 21,973 SF/0.50 AC 5.57%OF PA4 SITE 189,000 SF/4.33 AC 47,93%OF PA4 SITE 141,312 SF/3.25 AC 35.84%OF PA4 SITE 151,621 SF/3.48 AC 25.10%OF PA SITE 9000 SFY2.16 AC 15.56%OF PA SITE 358,540 SF18.23 AC 59.34%OF PA 3 SITE MAX BUILDING HEIGHT H1-HOTEL LOBBY 18'-0'-21'-6", SINGLE STORY RANGES': HI -HOTEL POOL BAR 11'-0'-14'-0", SINGLE STORY HS - HOTEL SPA 16'-3'-19'-3", SINGLE STORY 0 1 12'4--15'4", SINGLE STORY GR3 12'4'-15'4-, SINGLE STORY GR4 14'-10', SINGLE STORY CC CONFERENCE CENTER 28'-0'-31'-0", SINGLE STORY MC MEETING CENTER 15'LY 186", SINGLE STORY SS SHARED SERVICES 18'-0- 21 )", SINGLE STORY RESIDENTIAL PLAN I 16'-Y 19-5", SINGLE STORY RESIDENTIAL PLAN 2 17'-9--20'-9", SINGLE STORY RESIDENTIAL PLAN 3 17'-9'-20'-9", SINGLE STORY RESIDENTIAL PLAN 4 16'-8--19'-8", SINGLE STORY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: HOTEL: TYPE V-B, FULLY SPRINKLERED SPA: TYPE V-B, FULLY SPRINKLERED GUESTROOMS: TYPE V-B, FULLY SPRINKLERED MEETING CENTER: TYPE V-B, FULLY SPRINKLERED CONFERENCE CENTER: TYPE V-B, FULLY SPRINKLERED SHARED SERVICES BUILDING: TYPE V-B, FULLY SPRINKLERED ' MAXIMUM HEIGHT RANGE PROVIDED TO ACCOUNT FOR POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE OCCUPANCY: PA2- RAA-2, B, S1, S-2 PA 3-Ra PA4- A-2, B, S1, S2 PROPOSED LAND USE: PA2- HOTEL WITH SUPPORTING SPAAND RESTAURANT PA-3-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES PA4- CONFERENCE CENTER AND HOTEL SUPPORT SVCS SETBACKS: MINIMUM PERIMETER BUILDING/LANDSCAPE SETBACKS PER LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE, CT DISTRICT' BLDG. LS FROM PERIMETER STREET RIGHT OF WAY: 20' 10, FROM RESIDENTIAL, PR, OS AND GC DISTRICTS: 1. 15' 'SPECIFIC PLAN APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR DEVELOPMENTOR LAND DIVISION GREATER THAN 10ACRES IN THE CR, CP, AND CTDISTRICTS PER 9.90.040 BUILDING/LANDSCAPE SETBACKS PER SILVERROCK RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN BLDG. LS PA-2 FROM PERIMETER STREET RIGHT OF WAY. 10, 10, FROM INTERIOR PROPERTY LINES WITHIN SAME PROPERTY: 0 0' PA-3 FROM PERIMETER STREET RIGHTOFWAY. 10, 10, GARAGFJCARPOFIT FROM STREET CURB: 5' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF THE EXISTING AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE RESTAURANT A NEW 140 KEY LUXURY HOTEL, HOTEL SPA AND FITNESS BUILDING, MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER, FROM INTERIOR PROPERTY LINES WITHIN SAME PROPERTY: 0' 0' SHARED SERVICES BUILDING, LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENCES, PARKING AND RELATED SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION; PA2: THOSE PORTIONS OF PARCELS 1, 18, 20, 22, T AND'K OF PARCEL MAP 33367, AS SHOWN ON A IMPROVEMENTS ABUTTING MAI PA4 FROM PERIMETER STREET RIGHT OF WAY: 10' RESIDENTIAL, OS, AND GC DISTRICTS: 10' 0' GARAGFJCARPORT FROM STREET CURB: 5' FROM INTERIOR PROPERTY LINES WITHIN SAME PROPERTY: 0 10, 0' THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 224 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES 24 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, LOCATED WITHIN SECTIONS 5 AND 8, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNADINO MERIDIAN PAS: THOSE PORTIONS OF PARCELS 1,14,19 ANDW OF PARCEL MAP 33367, AS SHOWN ON A MAP SHEETINDEX THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 224 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES 24 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, LOCATED WITHIN SECTIONS 5,6, AND 8, TOWNSHIP G-0.0 PROJECT COVER SHEET SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNADINO MERIDIAN G-0.1 ARCHITECTURAL TITLE SHEET AND INDEX PA4: THOSE PORTIONS OF PARCELS 1,16 AND T OF PARCEL MAP 33367, AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREO FILED IN BOOK 224 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES 24 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE CIVIL COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, LOCATED WITHIN SECTIONS 5 AND 8, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNADINO MERIDIAN C-1 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN APN: 776-150022,777490-011,770-200026,776-150-021, 776-150-023, 777490007, C-2 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 777490-001, 777490-012, 7T7490-014, 777490-018 C-3 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: TOURIST COMMERCIAL C-4 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN OPEN SPACE -RECREATION OPEN SPACE -NATURAL LANDSCAPE SILVERROCK SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATION: LAN GAR 2: CIVIC AND CULTURAL EVENTS FACILITIES PLANNING AREA 3: BOUTIQUE HOTEL L-0.1 PLANTING NOTES AND LEGEND PLANNING AREA 4'. RESORT HOTEL AND RESORT CASITAS L-0.2 ILLUSTRATIVE OVERALL SITE PLAN ZONING: L-0.3 ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN - LUXURY HOTEL, SPA & SHARED SERVICES GC -GOLF COURSE LP-3.0 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT INDEX CT-TOURISTCOMMERCIAL LP-3.1 PRELIM INARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTTYPICAL GUESTROOMDETAIL SITE AREAGROSS: FP - FLOODPLAIN : LP-3.2 PRELIMI NARY LANDSCAPE EN LARGEMENT TYPICAL GU ESTROOM DETAIL PA2- 1,029,675 SF 23.6 AC LP-3.3 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT TYPICAL ENTRY DETAIL PA3- 604161 SF 13.9AD LP-3.4 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT TYPICAL MODEL HOME DETAIL PA4- 394:307 SF NET: 9.1 AC LP-3.5 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT TYPICAL STREETSCAPE DETAIL PA2- 927,312SF 21.3AC L-2,1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT HOTEL POOL PA3- 492,798 SF 11.3 AC L-2.2 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT HOTEL SPA PA4- 368,996SF 8.5AC L-2.3 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT HOTEL ENTRY ROAD L-2.4 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT RESIDENTIAL ENTRY L-2.5 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPE L-2.6 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT SILVER ROCK WAY ENTRY L-2.7 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT SHARED SERVICES SHEET INDEX CONTINUED L-2.8 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT SHARED SERVICED BUILDING L-2.9 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT TYPICAL GUESTROOM LANDSCAPE SP - L-1.1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN SP - L-1.2 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN SP - L-1.3 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN Sp- L-1.4 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN SP - L-1.5 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN LIGHTING E0.0 ELECTRICAL LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS AND SHEET INDEX EO.1 LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE E1.0 OVERALL SITE LIGHTING PLAN E1.1 MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER, SHARED SERVICES BUILDING SITE LIGHTING PLAN E1.2 HOTEL AND SPA SITE LIGHTING PLAN E1.3 GUESTROOMS SITE LIGHTING PLAN E1.4 MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER, SHARED SERVICES BUILDING SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC E1.5 HOTEL AND SPA SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC E1.6 GUESTROOMS SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC ARCHITECTURAL A-1.0 OVERALL ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A-1.1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - AREA A A-1.2 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN -AREAS A-1.3 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - AREA C A- .4 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - AREA D A-1.5 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - AREA E A-2.0 BUILDING RENDERINGS A-2.1 BUILDING RENDERINGS A-2.2 BUILDING RENDERINGS A-2.3 BUILDING RENDERINGS A-3.0 MATERIALS BOARD H1 -A-1.0 HOTEL BUILDING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 111- A-1.2 HOTEL POOL BAR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS H1 - A-2.0 HOTEL OVERALL ROOF PLAN H1 -A-3.0 HOTEL OVERALL FLOOR PLAN GR 1 - A-1.0 GR 1 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS GR 1 - A-2.0 FLOOR PLAN, ROOF PLAN GR 2 - A-1.0 GR 2 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, FLOOR PLAN, ROOF PLAN GR 3 - A-1.0 GR 3 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, FLOOR PLAN, ROOF PLAN GR4-A-1.0 GR4- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS GR 4 - A-2.0 FLOOR PLAN, ROOF PLAN HS-A-1.0 HOTEL SPA BUILDING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS HS-A-2.0 HOTEL SPA OVERALL ROOF PLAN HS-A-3.O HOTEL SPA OVERALL FLOOR PLAN OCC - A-1.0 OVERALL CONFERENCE & SHARED SERVICES ROOF PLAN OCC - A-2.0 OVERALL CONFERENCE & SHARED SERVICES FLOOR PLAN MC-A-1.0 MEETING CENTER BUILDING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS MC-A-2.0 MEETING CENTER OVERALL ROOF PLAN MC-A-3.0 MEETING CENTER OVERALL FLOOR PLAN CC-A-1.0 CONFERENCE CENTER BUILDING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CC-A-2.0 CONFERENCE CENTER OVERALL ROOF PLAN CC-A-3.0 CONFERENCE CENTER OVERALL FLOOR PLAN SS-A-1.0 SHARED SERVICES BUILDING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SS -A-2.0 SHARED SERVICES OVERALL ROOF PLAN SS -A-3.0 SHARED SERVICES OVERALL FLOOR PLAN LUXURY RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL R1 -1 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN R1- 2 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN R1 - 3 PLAN NO, 1 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION'A' R1-4 PLAN NO.1 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS' R1 -5 PLAN NO.1 CONCEPTUAL ROOF PLANS R1- 6 PLAN NO.1 CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLANS R1 -7 PLAN NO.2 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION'A' R1 - 8 PLAN NO.2 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION'B' R1-9 PLAN NO. 2 CONCEPTUAL ROOF PLANS R1-10 PLAN NO, 2 CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLANS R1-11 PLAN NO.3 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION'A' R1 -12 PLAN NO.3 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION'B' R1-13 PLAN NO.3 CONCEPTUAL ROOF PLANS R1 -14 PLAN NO.3 CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLANS R1 -15 PLAN NO.4 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION'A' R1-16 PLAN NO.4 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS' R1 -17 PLAN NO, 4 CONCEPTUAL ROOF PLANS R1-18 PLAN NO, 4 CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLANS SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 FaX 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 5�0 ARcy 44A��.t.ES K N,. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN 913°y^?P 9TF OP CAITfO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project NuI 55.7598.000 Description ARCHITECTURAL TITLE SHEET & INDEX Scale NOT TO SCALE G - 0.1 162 482015 Gensler NOTE: PLANTING AREAS ARE SHOWN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. ' �F C 1 � F J 26 27 Z� \ ' c 1 , } 57.5 36.> T F� 30.0 43 TPM P/L 25 ``\ F �`.�4 58.0 0PUE 10 \ ' Toy �� \ of E�C) F 49 � A` A 1 _ 24 �� ` 57.5 ° 36C 22 v v 35.5 6 A V A ro 21 55.0 \ \ \ \ \ 20 ��TPM P/L \ \ \ 34.5 `� vx PUE \ �\ 54.0 Ca- 28L, a \ i0 PUE ROADBED WIDTH/ ROADBED WIDTH/ lb \ \\ CURB FACE CURB FACE \�� 55.5 \ Y \ 10, B' 13:5' 13.5' 6 10' 17 k" TYPE "C" �Q� TYPE "C" p `' PAD ELEV PAD ELEV CURB pQQP CURB ,�pQ �, Rj \ SLOPE VARIES �% 2ro $LOPE VARIES N\ 55.0 \ -MASS GRADE STREET UNDER UT TYPICAL INTERIOR STREET' \ \\\ \ 26' R/W TYPICAL 5ECT70N 50A - NOT TO SCALE i 16 [ \ NOTE: NO ON STREET PARKING l �J�I 33.0 �\ \ ( i \ LEGEND 10 PUE 1 CUT/FILL LINE PROPOSED CONTOUR —99 EXISTING CONTOUR SLOPE VARIES, MAX. z I---�__--TOE �Z�`Y 33.5 \\ \ EXISTING PROPERTY LINE TPM FL PARCEL LINE FROM TENTATIVE \ \ PARCEL MAP \ ` 14 h 9kX 18' TTlyp. P.A. 3 EODMATED o PUE EARTHWORK QUANTITY 54•5 (RAW EARTHWORK) L. CUT = 32,400 CY35.0 FILL=10,600 CY NO T F O R L� 0 N S T R U l� T I O �I TPM P/L VFOR, 0O LIABLE CHANGES rT OUSESRIZE THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS W/LL NOT N RESPONSIBLE \`Y` 12 \ y1\ L 38.0 `\\` FOR, OR LIABLE FOR, UNAUTHORIZED CHANCES TO OR USES OF THESE PLANS, ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST RE IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED SY THE PREPARER OF THESE PLANS. Y 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE: NOTE' APPROVAL BY: CITY OF LA BIIINTA IN THE CITY OF LA DUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. BENCHMARK: BASIS OF BEARINGS: STATE OF CALIFORNIA s H E E T CALL BEFORE YOU DIG AU UNDEhGR0UN0 tAnLINES � SabR/ 4216 LU THE OVINNENT CLUE LOCATIONS ARE PER REC0R0 DESCRIPTION. THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON Qgp{ESs70Nq "'U AN """ CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN 1 OR"'Y"S' NUNISB SE PLANS THE CONTRACTOR KPD-f03-3-7D ED. 1 1/4' O.O.I, P. FILLED THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 6, T65, R7E, Q a" Sir �c Issuro SEraIS A FERM1 SHALL 9S£ OU£ CAUTA7N IN N/ CONC. IN 5' O.D. CONC. COLLAR ON. SBM, AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP NO.28470-1, s INTERNATIONAL DAB SILVERROCK RESORT TO 11.VA11 WttL Bf YALA. ALL E....AIION, ANO NOTE lIMO1HY R. JONASSON. BE 0.6', 330 NORTH OF C.L. INT. OF WASHINGTON ME 263/76-90, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE No. 57667 Puauc WORK DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER Rae rout aec-awvATroN io WHfREALL UTLDTYLINES 75410 Gera la Ford Drive, Suite f00, Palm Desert, CA P.A. 3 (WEST HALE NUDeEx PILL STREET & 52NO AVENUE & 6.2 SOUTH OF COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING Exp. 12-31-201 ]a www. mha ker intl.rom OF 4 SHEETS UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT ART L0CA7E0 �R RfLOCATFD PPY 98927D 0. 760-345-7481 is 750-345-8315 R.C.E. NO. A58 EXP. 12-31-16 FOR ODRONTA7ONONOFME ON PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: DRAWN DESIGNED JOB NUMBER BEING A PORTION THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF TOLL FREE I-800-227-2600 FlNAL DRAWINGS OF RfCORO. DATE BY DE5CRIPTON APFD DATE TWO WORKING OAKS DATE: TWO R, TOWNSHIP fi SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST 5.8. 8.& M. BEFORE YOU DIG ELEV. = 40. 110 R E V I S 1 0 N S MICHAEL S. SUTTON R.C.E. 57667 SCALE AS SHOWN CHECKED 'ISE DALE MAY 16. 2016 FOR: CITY OF LA QUINTS, PAOJECi N0. 152669 Q- 2IL a 2F 13.5' 13.5' sTYPE LROADBEOWrOTHI "C" TYPE "C" PAD ELEVCURB �% ( CURB 2$ Wm 1 y "W—MASS GRADE STREET UNDERCUT TYPICAL INTERIOR 57-REET 28' RM/ TYPICAL SECRON NOT TO SCALE NOTE: NO ON STREET PARKING P.A. 3 E57IMATE0 EARTHWORK QUANTITY (RAW EARTHWORK) CUT = 32,400 CY FILL = 10,000 CY NOTE: PLANTING AREA5 ARE SHOWN ON LAN05CAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN5. 1755.0 \, \ _-------___ ----__------_—__ ----------- — — — — — — 15 33.5 , , g T X .sterns A TPM /L 9• iv Typ. \ PAO ELEV `YT 14 10 SUE \ \\ \ \ \ O ` 34.5 13 � TPM P/L �` T 35.0 � \ TPM P/L 12 38.0 . \�� \ ® O o T 10' PUZ910 T 30D ` s x1&Typ. \ 39.0 ' C ---- PUE Fs F� = / c It 10 PUE 36.5 c F 37.5 58.0 A A GY 7 F iI a TPM P/L 3�TY A 8 57-3 c,---- � \ 57.0 I i ----- -. �LIMRS OF GRADING, i LEGEND CUT/FILL LINE -- —C-- F PROPOSED CONTOUR —99 - EXISTING CONTOUR SLOPE VARIES, TOP MAX. 2.*1 ---- --- —TOE TPM P/L _ P/L EXISTING 11��//�` N PROPERTY LINE �n I V tJ T F O R - TPM PL PARCEL LINE FROM TENTATIVE - � '� T �`� I� J1H71/ XffP1Ati �iiAN t &USES H F""NEER ERFPARW,, THE I : aiEL 07 eE PESPays1REE PARCEL MAP \ I U �,� GR, �n �Y'BLE FOA ��NAJTH�R�ZFO CHANGES TO OR L E, aF YH r AL CHAN:;E TO THE ` l� VVV L! I L I J SE lf/ WkiT''A AND MJST NE RPPFCiI"C SY W,E PRE 4 IW-s PANS. IMPORTANT NOTICE. NOTE' BENCHMARK: BASIS OF BEARINGS: APPROVAL BY: CITY OF LA BIIINTA IN THE CITY DO LA DUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA S H E E T CALL BEFORE YOU DIG sarxry 4216 cF THE OVERNNENT E E AU UNofEANoVNDUH[InZS Iq' ESELONq REaInN,Np,Rr ' mcNnrrraTrox Nuwere ec LOCATIONS ARE PER NECORO PIANS THE CONTR4CTON DESCRIPTION. KPD-f03-3-7D FO. 1 1/4' O. D.I, P. FILLED THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 6, T65, RUE, Q a" Sir �c CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN 2 rssuro eEraaEn vE,roa [ X/ COIJC, IN 5' O.D. CONE. COLLAR ON. SBM, AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP N0.28470-1, �1 I N T E R N A T I O N A L °A SILVERROCK RESORT TOCX."P41 wal eE vu,o. rae rant vec-awvaTroN io 41 EXCAVATION, AND NOTE WHfRE A(/UTILITY LINES 0.6'.330 NORTH OF C.L. INT. OF WASHINGTON NE 263/76-90, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE ND. 57667 1aI 75410 Gera ltl Foro Drive, Suite f00, Palm Desert, CA lIMO1HY R. JONASSON. PE POBUC WOWS DIRECTOR/CITY ENgNEER 4 uu,eEx au. ART LOCATED DR RELOCATED STREET & 52N0 AVENUE G 6.2' SOUTH OF COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING Eq 12-31-201 ww1,.v%,Printl.rom P.A. 3 (EAST HALF) GF SHEETS UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT FOROOCUNENTATIONONON PPY 9B927D p. 760-346-7481 is 750-346-3375 R.C.E. NO. 45843 EXP. 12-31-16 TOLL FREE fINAt DRAWINGS OF NfCORO. BY PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: DRAWN DESIGNED JOB NUMBER BEING A PORTION THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF WORKING 7W0 WORKING DAYS DA KSD DATE DE5CRIPOOIN APP'D DATE DATE: SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP fi SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST S.B.B.& M. BEFORE YOU DIG ELEV. = 40. 110 R E V I S 1 0 N S MICHAEL S. SUTTON R.C.E. 57667 SCALE AS SHOWN CHECKED NSE DATE MAY 16. 2016 FOR: CITY OF LA OUINTA PRDJECi NO 152659 O Z J m CL C 10 N 16 NOTE: PLANTING AREAS ARE SHOWN ON �\ 9 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. LEGEND l_ \\\ ` P.A. 2 NORTH ESTIMATED PROPOSED LINE E - PROPOSED CONTOUR —e9 — _ - \ \ EARTHWORK QUANTITY P.A. 4 ESTIMATED EXISTING CONTOUR \\ \ \ EARTHWORK QUANTITY MA SLOPE VARIES, , r_TOE X. 11 y Y Y TOE (RAW EARTHWORK) PROPERTY LINE -- i ` CUT = 21,700 CY RAW EARTHWORK 18.5 ' 3 rROADII.Ell .5' \ \ \ A ^ ( ) TPM PL PARCEL LINE FROM TENTATIVE ROADBED WIDTH/ '3 WIDTH/ \ \ \ \ \ FILL=14,400 CY CUT = 5,300 CY PARCEL MAP zH CURB FACE 6" 15' 15 ' 6RB FACE. FILL = 77,200 CY w \\ \\\ 13. 9' 13.9' F i I \ \ \ TYPE "C"o.01 cuaez% �21 21 >10 'MASS GRADE STREET UNDER UT \ Q --a_ — ---- TYPE „C„ 51LVERROCK WAY CURB 31, R/W Hill NOT TO SCALE U NOTE: NO ON STREET PARKING \ TPM i 10 TPM P/L 55.0 \10PUE39.0iyG \ `� Pk,3 Etmdle ev Typ. C \ / I , S \ TPM P/L 36.5 -- osx \� /yam Fri 10 PUE e 365.5 7 Q, TPM P/L Y 8 37.3� C 37.0 --- ZL- -- - o LIMR5 OF GRADING VA - _ __ v �v CON " T UC T� 0�l II UNAUTHORIZED L{l OS�J'—TLlE ENCINEE PREP IIESf PLANS WILL NOT B tSPLNSIBLE FOR, OR LLARLE FOR, UNAU _ L'sE.i OF THESE PLANS. ALL CHANCES ri THE- \ 1 f PLANS MUST BE IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PREPARER OF THESE PLANS \ IMPORTANT NOTICE. NOIL' APPROVAL BY: CITY OF LA BIIINTA IN THE CITY OF LA DUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, S H E E T BENCHMARK: BASIS OF BEARINGS: STATE of CALIFORNIA CALL BEFORE YOU DIG ALL UIJDEAGROUND UII[IIIES � SWc 4216 r wWRnrErw cent LOCAR96 ARE PER RECORD DESCRIPTION'. THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON Qp,OF fS8910 � �. . RIB � AR IND A 6 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN nBnmrATrod xuNem ec �C THE CON724C7OR KPo-fO3-3-7D ED. 1 1/4' O.O.I, P. FILLED THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 6, T65, R7E, Q pE SST rc bsuEo aEroaE A FEftYII SHALL USf DDE CAU/AAV IN W/ CONC. IN 5' O.O. CONC. COLLAR ON. GEM, AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP NO.28470-1, INTERNATIONAL DALE SILVERROCK RESORT ID EXGVATE WllL BE uatA. ALL fXGi,AlION, AIJO NOTE 0.6', 330 NORTH OF C.L. INT. DF WASHINGTON TIMOTHY R. JONASSON, PE Fae roue paE-IXfAVAl-N1 ggLOgE ALL 0.... LINES ME 263/76-90, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE No. 57667 75410 Gereltl FOrS Dr1ve, Suite 100, Palm Desert, CA Puauc wofms DIRECTOR/CI1Y ENGINEER M1nNEtR ptt STREET & 52NO AVENUE & 6.2' SOUTH OF COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING Exp. 12-31-201 www. mha ker int Lrom P.A. 2 (Portion) & P.A. 4 OF 4 SHEETS UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERTLOCA" OR RELOCATED RRy 989279 O'. 750-345-7481 f: 750-345-8315 R.C.E. NO. 45843 EXP. 12-31-16 FOR BD*WIN6TA7IONONON PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: DRAWN DESIGNED JOB NUMBER BEING A PORTION THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF TOLL FREE I-800-2 DAYS HAWL DRAWINGS' Of RECORD. DATE BY DE5CRIPTION APP'D DATE SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST S.R.R. & M. TWO WORKING DAYS DATE: SCALE CHECKED DATE TOP: PROJECT ND. 152D5J BEFORE YOU DIG ELEV. = 40. 110 R E V I S I G N S MICHAEL S. SUTTON R.O.E. 57667 as snOwN wss MAY 16, 2016 CITY OF LA C U I N T A I \\ — " NOTE: PLANTING AREAS ARE SHOWN ON \ TPM P/L �i \; LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. It / _ _ TPM P/L �; I\ Tod ,gym F \ O C� P.A. 2 50U7-H E57-IMATEO .. u EARTHWORK QUANTITY (RAW EARTHWORK) CUT=14,000 CY F \ \\ \, FILL = 59,100 CY To /I 24.5 it O '''� � \� 25.0• n '---__ .� , s' `v a/ �` o . .JOIN TPM FA - TH -CACOLFRTPA TPM P/L— �F _ Q. TPM PL FLEI \\ \\ �� 23.0 s `�.,,` - - �-', , ,� �_ '_py ' ---_,�-, W.5.15='' c JOINF105T1NG Y� 823.0 CT ,\ ,---� ,J`. r- ((' F l GOLF CART PATH c % `. Syr 125.0' 23.1 c, LEGEND , CUT/FILL LINE -- - F— � _ � � - _- ---- � o_ � I 24.� i PROPOSED CONTOUR —se — -y.-_ C'IF EXISTING CONTOUR --- -- --- l �(�\ o —TPM P/L \\�� SLOPE VARIES, MAX. 21 _�L__�l__TOE sn\ 23.D --- ' EXISTING PROPERTY LINE \ i ..,., o TPM PL PARCEL LINE FROM TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP i�6 \ �%0j \ A �y4- �.\ 24:0 \ J01N EXISTING GOLF CART PATH F v 25.0 - - - / ,,NOT FOR _-, ---- I'JO/�IN UNAUTHORIZED CHANCES B' USES: THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR, OR LIABLE FOR, UNAUTHORIZED CHANCES TO OR USES OF THESE PLANS ALL CHANGES TO THE CONS TRUC T ION EXISTING GOLF CART PATH PLANS MUST BE IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PREPARER OF THESE PLANS. IMPORTANT NOTICE: CALL BEFORE YOU DIG NOTL ALL BENCHMARK: BASIS OF BEARINGS: APPROVAL BY: CITY OF LA OUINTA IN THE CITY OF LA DUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA S H E E T SZVm 4216 � AT saWRNUENL cent REWIRES AN MOUIRY - nEMIFlGDON xuNem eE W4 ` .UNDEAGROUNDUIILNLES LOCAIIOVS AYE PER RECORD %ANS THE CONT24C70R DESCRIPTION: RPo-103-3-70 ED. 1 1/4- O.O.I.P. FILLED THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 6, T6S, RTE, Qp,OF ESSLpy� Q`�� pE� 5 SO ! .Z. ;� CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN A bsuEo a FERYR SHALL USf DUE CAU/AAV IN W/ CONC. IN 1C 0. D. CONC. COLLAR ON. SEN. AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP NO.28470-1, s I N T E R N A T 1 O N A L °"'� SILVERROCK RESORT 4 ro 0` a'rz N BE uNm. F64 roue pRE-arnvarrory to xuueEx AI EXGNA ON, ANO NO E 09/£RE ALL UTILITY L/Nf5 0.6', 330 NORTH OF C.L. INT. STEELY & 52N0 AVENUE 6 6.2' OF WASHIN6TON SOUTH OF NE 263/76-90, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING No. 57667 Exp. 12-31-201 75410 Gerald Ford Drive. Suite 100, Palm Desert, CA www. mha ker i nt 1. rom TIMOTHY R. JONASSON, PE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER P.A. 2 (Portion) OF 4 SHEETS UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERTARE LOCATED OR RELOCATED fORDOCULAENTATTOM7NON PP} 98927D a. 750-345-7481 f: 750-346-8315 R.C.E NO. 454143 UP. 12-31-16 TOLL FREE I-800-227-2600 FlAWL DRAWINGS OF RECORD. DATE BY DESCRIPTION APP'D DATE PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: DRAWN DESIGNED JOB NUMBER BEING A PORTION THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION B, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST S.8.B.6 M. TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG ELEV. = 40.110 R E V I S 1 D N S DATE SCALE CHECJED DATE FORT CITY OF LA QUINTq PROJECT NO lezeee MICHAEL S. BUTTON R.D.E.57667 AS SHOWN MSs MAY 16.2016 7 rl 1 44 LEGEND 25 �_--' -` o_ CUT/FILL LINE — esa wv (J PROPOSED CONTOUR —89 2 EXISTING CONTOUR --- — �eN ` �e SLOPE VARIES, 22 c` x MAX. 2:1 EXISTING �\ 2Tl `� PROPERTY LINE aea1 �\ to x\ c TPM PL PARCEL LINE FROM TENTATIVE ` \ ZO. x PARCEL MAP 19 �� 17 15 m 14, 1 12 O rn 12 3 4 110 Wta trM NI W.a c , ,o - I ----- _- I - I I -- PHASE 1 DESIGN SLOPES I , tea; J 57o OR GREATER — 4 Oct asTxs \\xl J , _ L TM 1 /o Lg > O b4 O / I . i trNm Cam\ ''NOT I UNAUTHORIZED CHANGE 8' USES. THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE \ � O I \' � � � V I � o' \' FOR, OR LIABLE FOR, UNA UTHORIZEO CHANCES TO OR USES OF THESE PLANS ALL CHANGES TO THE V V PLANS MUST BE IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PREPARER OF THESE PLANS. IMPORTANT NOTICE. NOILAPPROVAL BY: CITY OF LA DUINTA IN THE CITY DO LA DUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALL BEFORE YOU DIG ALL UNOEAGROONp OII[NES BENCHMARK: BASIS OF BEARINGS: STATE OF CALIFORNIA S H E E T sECR,ry 4216 OT rxcaWRnAEr✓T CfllE LOCATKMS ARE PER RECORD DESCRIPTION: THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON Qp,OF ESSLpy� SLOPES 5% OR GREATER REWIRES AN INQUIRY %ANS THE CONT24C70R Q`�� pE� S' SO - ®BlRFlG1ION xuNem eE RPo-103-3-70 ED. 1 1/4' O.O.LP. FILLED THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 6, TfiS, R7E, .r � c bsuEo aEroRE A FERYII SHALL USf DUE CAN/pN IN W/ CONC. IN 5' O.O. CONC. COLLAR ON. SEN. AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP NO.28470-1, s INTERNATIONAL DATE SILVERROCK RESORT IO EXGVATE WxL BE UNA. ALI fXG1,A,,,, ANO NOTE 0.6', 330 NORTH ff C.L. INT. OF WASHIN6TON � TIMOTHY R. JONASSON, PE F64 roue pRE-IXfAVAl-L0. µq�gE ALL OTIUTY ONES NE 263/76-90. RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE No. 57657 75410 Gerald Ford Drive. Suite Too, Palm Desert, CA PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER xuueEN ptt STREET & 52NO AVENUE & 5.2 SOUTH OF COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING Exp. 12-39-201 www. mha ker intl.rom P.A. 2 (Portion) & P.A. 4 OF I -.TT UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERro, LOGIEO OR RfLOCATEP pp} 989270 a. 760-346-7481 f: 760-346-8395 R.CE ND. L5841 UP. 12-51-18 TOLL FREE I-BUD-227-260 OML D p1jN6A7IONONON PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: DRAWN DESI(NED JOB NUMBER BEING A PORTION THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF TWO WORKING DAYS FlAWL CRAWINCS OF RECORD. DATE BY DESCRIPTION APP'D DATE DATE SECTION B. TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST S.8.B.6 M. BEFORE YOU DIG ELEV. = 40.110 R E V I S 1 0 N S MICHAEL S. BUTTON R.O.E.57667 SCALE AS SHOWN CHID Nss DATE AUGUST W. z +FOR: CITY OF LA QUINTA PROJECT NO 15ze69 Plant Legend Canopy Trees Symbol Botanical name Vertical Accents Minimum Size Symbol Botanical name Parkinsonia x'Desert Museum' ++ Desert Museum Palo Verde 36" Box 0 Cereus hildmannianus++ Peru Apple Cactus Prosopis glandulosa Texas Honey Mesquite Ulmus parvifolia'True Green' Chinese Elm Accent Trees Symbol Botanical name Common Name Minimum Size Common Name Chilopsis linearis Desert Willow 15 Gal X Chitalpa tashkintensis Chitalpa Citrus species Citrus Lysiloma watsonii Desert Fern Ebenopsis ebano Texas Ebony Olneya tesota Desert Ironwood Sophora secundiflora Texas Mountain Laurel Thevetia nerifolia Yellow Oleander Vitex agnus-castus Chaste Tree Palms Symbol Botanical name Common Name Minimum Size Brahea armata Mexican Blue Fan Palm Varies 6-20' BTH Phoenix dactylifera Date Palm Washingtonia filifera California Fan Palm Turf Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size Bermuda sod Dasylirion wheeleri ++ Desert Spoon Dodonaea viscosa'Purpuraea' Purple Hop Bush Fouquieria splendens++ Ocotillo Hesperoyucca whipplei ++ Foothill Yucca Thevetia nerifolia (peruviana) Yellow Oleander Yucca rostrata ++ Beaked Yucca Native / Naturalized Desert Zone Symbol Botanical name Common Name Enhanced Desert Landscape Plant material to supplement "Native / Naturalized Desert Zone" Common Name Minimum Size Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size 36" Box Size Agave americana ++ Century Plant 5 Gal Aloe striata ++ Coral Aloe 1 Gal Baccharis pilularis Dwarf Coyote Brush 1 Gal Baileya multiradiata Desert Marigold 1 Gal Caesalpinia pulcherrima Red Bird of Paradise 5 Gal Calliandra californica Baja Fairy Duster 1 Gal Dalea frutescens'Sierra Negra' Black Dalea 1 Gal Dalea greggii Trailing Indigo Bush 1 Gal Dyssodia acerosa Shrubby Dogwood 1 Gal Echinocactus grusonii ++ Golden Barrel Cactus 5 Gal Encelia ferinosa Brittlebush 1 Gal Ericameria laricifolia Turpentine Bush 1 Gal Ericameria nauseosa Rubber Rabbitbrush 1 Gal Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue 1 Gal Hesperoyucca whipplei ++ Foothill Yucca 1 Gal Larrea tridentata Creosote Bush 1 Gal Leucophyllum species Texas Ranger 5 Gal Muhlenbergia rigens Deer Grass 1 Gal Opuntia species ++ Prickly Pear 5 Gal Penstemon spectabilis Royal Beard Tongue 1 Gal Senna artemisiodes Feathery Cassia 1 Gal Stipa tenuissima Mexican Feather Grass 1 Gal Tecoma stans Yellow Bells 5 Gal Asparagus densiflorus'Sprengeri' Sprenger Asparagus 1 Gal Bougainvillea spp. Red Bougainvillea 5 Gal Bulbine frutescens ++ No Common Name 1 Gal Carissa macrocarpa'Tuttle' Natal Plum 5 Gal Euphorbia rigida ++ Yellow Spurge 1 Gal Eremophila maculata'Valentine' Spotted Emu Bush 1 Gal Feijoa sellowiana Pineapple Guava 5 Gal Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian Laurel Fig 15 Gal Justicia spicigera Mexican Honeysuckle 1 Gal Lantana species No Common Name 1 Gal Ligustrum japonicum'Texanum' WaxLeafPrivet 5 Gal Myrtus communis Myrtle 1 Gal Pedilanthus macrocarpus Slipper Plant 5 Gal Penstemon eatonii Firecracker Penstemon 1 Gal Portulacaria afra ++ Elephant'sFood 1Gal Prunus caroliniana Carolina Laurel Cherry 15 Gal Punica granatum Flowering Pomegranate 5 Gal Rhus lancea African Sumac 15 Gal Rosmarinus officinalis species Rosemary 1 Gal Ruellia brittoniana Mexican Petunia 1 Gal Salvia greggii Autumn Sage 1 Gal Santolina chamaecyparissus Lavender Cotton 1 Gal Sophora secundiflora Texas Mountain Laurel 1 Gal Tecoma capensis* Cape Honeysuckle 5 Gal Trachelospermum jasminoides Star Jasmine 1 Gal Westringia fruticosa Coast Rosemary 1 Gal Xylosma congestum Shiny Xylosma 5 Gal Vines Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size Bougainvillea spp. Red Bougainvillea 5 Gal Hardenbergia violacea False Sarsaparilla 5 Gal Macfadyena unguis-cati *** Cat's Claw 5 Gal Pyrostegia venusta Flame Vine 5 Gal Rosa banksiae Lady Banks' Rose 5 Gal SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 2251 Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 858 794 7204 T 858 794 7207 F www.bu rton-studio.com p Date Description 08-16-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/ Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 5 7 Wm. 5. unon No.2135 y aL Project Name ep 31 SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Landscape Planting Notes & Legend Scale L-0.1 168 15 Gensler I SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 2258madway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Lend sce pe Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 e5a 794 7— T 858 794 7207 F _ bu non stud o.com L Date Description 05-i6-2016 SDP Submittal N. 09.19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 I Seal/ Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 7 Wm. S. urton No.2135 y do Project Name a „� SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Deserlplion Illustrative Overall Site Plan Swill 11,= 150'-0" 0 75 150 300 L-0.2 169 2015 Gensler SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 2258madway TO 6195572500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Ced... Solana Beach Ca 92075 858 794 7204 T 858 794 7207 F —..b-,n stud o.com 1,LDate Description 05-i6-2016 SDP Submittal N. 09.19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/ Signature C PpCNITEC,. 202`Pp ST9F0 7 Wm. S. urton No.2135 y Project Name a „� SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Illustrative Site Plan - Luxury Hotel, Spa & Shared Services Scale 1" = 80'-0" 17 0 20 40 So 160 L-0.3 170 3ensler KEY PLAN r — \ PA MC L PA \ CC SS AH \ — \PA4 H1 HS ; ` LP.7 I PA GR SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 2256madway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 eye 794 7— T 858 794 7207 F _ bu rto_—dio.com Date Description 05-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/ Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 7 Wm. S. unon No. 3135 y o Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Index Swle 0 Os 10 20 LP-3.0 171 © 2015 Gensler Plant List Trees Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size OCereus peruvianus Peruvian Apple 36" box �-✓ Parkinsonia x'Desert Museum' No Common Name 36" box ► Prosopis glandulosa Honey Mesquite 36" box Vines Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size 0 Bougainvillea 'La Jolla' No Common Name 15 gal - Staked Shrubs, Perennials, and Annuals Symbol Spacing Botanical name Common Name Size AA 7' o.c. Agave americana ++ Century Plant 20 gal BL 36" D.C. Bougainvillea'La Jolla' La Jolla Bougainvillea 1 gal BO 30" o.c. Bulbine frutescens ++ No Common Name 1 gal Cp 7' D.C. Caesalpinia pulcherrima * Red Bird of Paradise 1 gal Ef 5' D.C. Encelia farinosa Brittlebush 1 gal Em 36" o.c. Eremophila maculata'Valentine' No Common Name 1 gal O36" O.0 Festuca mairei No Common Name 1 gal Hp 18" O.C. Hesperaloe parviflora ++ Red Yucca 1 gal Lt 8' D.C. Larrea tridentata Creosote Bush I gal Mr 4' D.C. Muhlenbergia rigens Deergrass 1 gal Op 36" o.c. Opuntia ficus-indica ++ Prickly Pear 1 gal Pe 24" D.C. Penstemon parryi Parry's Penstemon 1 gal Ro. 48" o.c. Rosmarinus officinalis'Prostratus' Rosemary 1 gal Rp 36" D.C. Ruellia peninsularis Desert Ruellia 1 gal Lm 48" D.C. Lantana montevidensis Trailing Lantana 1 gal KEY PLAN - PA MC L PA \ CC - SS AH \ �� \PA4 - * H1 HS ; �,LP3 PA2 GR v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 858 7 4 7204 T 858 794 7207 F www.bu rton-studio.com L Date Description OSi6-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 I Seal/Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 5 7 Wm. 5. unon No.2135 y Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Typical Guestroom Landscape Detail Scale a os m zo LP-3.1 172 2015 Gensler HP HP HP HP HP Ad Ad Ad A �- 1 i R.+ 3f?3 . 'u;'�uifis. III lllll�ii� r t) Ws 13' 1.t VHP HP HP Ca Ca Ca Ca Ca HP HP Ca Ce H Of Of H HP Of P f Of 0 ryN�� Plant List Trees Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size OCereus peruvianus Peruvian Apple 36" box Cordia boissieri Texas Olive 24" box Fouquieria splendens Ocotillo 36" box Lysilomawatsonii Desert. Fern 15gal Parkinsonia x'Desert Museum' No Common Name 36" box ► Prosopis glandulosa Honey Mesquite 36" box Yucca rosrata Beaked Yucca 36" box Palms Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size Washingtonia filifera California Fan Palm 25' BTH Shrubs, Perennials, and Annuals Symbol Spacing Botanical name Common Name Size Ad 48" D.C. Agave desmettiana 'Variegata' ++ Variegated Smooth Agave 1 gal 36' o.c. Aloe'Blue Elf' No Common Name 1 gal I B I 30' D.C. Bulbine frutescens ++ No Common Name 1 gal cg 36' o.c. Carissa macrocarpa'Green Carpet' Natal Plum 1 gal Ca 30' D.C. Citrus aurantium Sour Orange 1 gal Df 5' D.C. Dalea frutescens 'Sierra Negra' Black Dalea 1 gal Hp 18" D.C. Hesperaloe parviflora ++ Red Yucca 1 gal SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 eye 7 94 7— T 858 794 7207 F www.bu rton-studio.com Date Description 05-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal N. 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/Signature Rp 36" D.C. Ruellia peninsularis Desert Ruellia 1 gal C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 7 Wm. 5. urton No.2135 KEY PLAN Project Name a „� PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES Project Number ` —1— — SS 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Typical Guestroom Landscape Detail AH PA 4 H1 PA 2 Swle HSLP3.2i; =10'0" 20 LP-3.2 GR 173 © 2015 Gensler n i > 4 L V AJ i HP i L �> HP HP HP HP HP HP HP I HP HP HP HP HP � I HP HP HP 1 Plant List Trees Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size Ebenopsis ebano Texas Ebony 36" box OParkinsonia x'Desert Museum' No Common Name 36" box ► Prosopis glandulosa Honey Mesquite 36" box Yucca rosrata Beaked Yucca 36' box Palms Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size • Washingtonia filifera California Fan Palm 25' BTH Shrubs, Perennials, and Annuals Symbol Spacing Botanical name Common Name Size Ad 48" D.C. Agave desmettiana 'Variegata' ++ Variegated Smooth Agave 1 gal Ag 7' o.c. Agave guiengola ++ Creme Brulee Agave 20 gal BL 36" D.C. Bougainvillea'La Jolla' La Jolla Bougainvillea 1 gal B� 30" D.C. Bulbine frutescens ++ No Common Name 1 gal Ef 5' o.c. Encelia farinosa Brittlebush 1 gal Hp 18" D.C. Hesperaloe parviflora ++ Red Yucca 1 gal Lt 8' D.C. Larrea tridentata Creosote Bush 1 gal Mr 4' o.c. Muhlenbergia rigens Deergrass 1 gal Op 36" o.c. Opuntia ficus-indica ++ Prickly Pear 1 gal Rp 36" D.C. Ruellia peninsularis Desert Ruellia 1 gal Sc 72" D.C. Simondia chinensis Jojoba 15 gal KEY PLAN - PA MC L PA \ CC - SS AH` LP 3 4 PA H1 PA HS `i / ♦ �.0 •a # GR v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 858 794 7204 T 858 794 7207 F —W.bu rton-studio.com L Date Description 05-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 7 Wm. 5. unon No.2135 y Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Typical Entry Landscape Detail Style 0 Os 10 20 LP-3.3 174 15 Gensler Plant List Trees Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size OCereus peruvianus Peruvian Apple 36" box Chilopsis linearis Desert Willow 36" box Parkinsonia x'Desert Museum' No Common Name 36" box Yucca rosrata Beaked Yucca 36" box Vines Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size 01 Bougainvillea 'La Jolla' No Common Name 15 gal - Staked Shrubs, Perennials, and Annuals Symbol Spacing Botanical name Common Name Size Ag T o.c. Agave agave guiengola ++ Ov 18" D.C. Agave victoriae-reginae ++ BL 36" D.C. Bougainvillea 'La Jolla' OB 30" D.C. Bulbine frutescens ++ O30" D.C. Bulbine frutescens ++ Ca 30" D.C. Citrus aurantium Er 5' o.c. Euphorbia rigida ++ EO 5' o.c. Euphorbia resinifera Ly 36" D.C. Lantana x 'New Gold' Rp 36" D.C. Ruellia peninsularis Creme Brulee Agave Victoria Agave La Jolla Bougainvillea No Common Name No Common Name Sour Orange Yellow Spurge No Common Name No Common Name Desert Ruellia 20 gal 1 gal 1 gal 1 gal 15 gal 1 gal 1 gal 1 gal 1 gal 1 gal KEY PLAN - PA MC L PA \ CC - SS AH` LP3 4 \PA4 H1 PA2 HS GR v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 858 794 7204 T 858 794 7207 F www.bu rton-studio.com L Date DescHlitionDate Description OSi6-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/ Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 7 Wm. 5. urton No.2135 y Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Typical Model Home Landscape Detail �Swle 0 Os 10 20 LP-3.4 175 2015 Gensler Plant List Trees Symbol Botanical name Dalbergia sissoo \-✓ Parkinsonia x'Desert Museum' ► Prosopis glandulosa Vines Symbol Botanical name Ql Bougainvillea 'La Jolla' Common Name Size Indian Rosewood 36' box No Common Name 36' box Honey Mesquite 36' box Common Name Size No Common Name 15 gal - Staked 0 Df f� Shrubs, Perennials, and Annuals Symbol Spacing Botanical name Common Name Size Ad 48' o.c. Agave desmettiana 'Variegata' ++ Variegated Smooth Agave 1 gal BO 30' o.c. Bulbine frutescens ++ No Common Name 1 gal Df 5' o.c. Dalea frutescens 'Sierra Negra' Black Dalea 1 gal Hp 18' D.C. Hesperaloe parviflora ++ Red Yucca 1 gal Ly 36' o.c. Lantana x'New Gold' No Common Name 1 gal Lg 5' D.C. Leucophyllum frutescens'Green Cloud' Green Cloud Texas Ranger 15 gal Mc 36' o.c. Myrtus communis Myrtle 15 gal KEY PLAN r — PA MC 1LP3.5 CC ` Eli l SS \ AH \ PA 4 �H1 HS► PA GR v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 a,a 794 7— T 858 794 7207 F _ bu rton-studio.com L Date Description 05-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 I Seal/Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 s 7 Wrn S. unon No.2135 y a`L Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Typical Streetscape Landscape Detail Scale a os m zo LP-3.5 176 2015 Gensler S pa Sp 0 ro Pool Fence Kid's Bar Patio -0" • • VAS M d� �� • r 'Turf- _ - • -------------------------------- -------------- — — -------------------T'oat-Fence---------------------— • Concrete Walkway Concrete Walkway- �. 60 — ti •.- .� c • � � � _ � Turf � • � •OO .. _ .✓ _ Turf ' Concrete Cart Path '0v \• \ .Turf ./r • _ - ' QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 V San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Landscape Architecture Studio Symbol Description 307 S ced,os Solana 13-1, Ca 92075 eye 794 7— T 858 794 7207 F < � '�7�ww. bu rton stud o.com `' Natural Landscape w Enhanced Desert � Date Description Turf OSi6-211: SDP Submittal 1o.12 09-19-201SDP Submittal N. 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System `PQc""`NiT"''srgr Design Ordinance. o _ 7 Wm. S. urton No.2135 KEY PLAN Project Name a „� PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES Project Number ` � -1- - SS 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Hotel Pool AH \ �� PA 4 j H1 HS " ALL. Ih PA "5wle �� .� 7� I-2. a05102a 40 L�..�% GR177 © 2015 Gensler QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 V San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Landscape Architecture Studio Symbol Description 307 S ced,ns Solana 13-1, Ca 92075 858 7 4 7204 T 858 794 7207 F < � '�7�ww.bu rton-studio.com `' Natural Landscape w Enhanced Desert Date Description Turf 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System `PQc""`NiT"''sryr Design Ordinance. 5 7 Wm. S. urtan No. 2135 y KEY PLAN Project Name a „� PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES X Project Number ` -1- - SS 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement \ f AH Hotel Spa — PA _K�j- -k;' H1 �PA2 �Swle a 05 10 2a 40 L-2.2 GR 178 © 2015 Gensler I QUICK LEGEND & NOTES Trees & Palms Symbol Type Canopy Trees \J-t" Accent Trees Vertical Accents V Palms Shrubs Symbol Description Natural Landscape Enhanced Desert Turf Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System Design Ordinance. KEY PLAN - PA MC L PA \ CC - SS AH \_f \PA 4 H� PA2 HS L `\ / GR Z v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 858 794 7204 T 858 794 7207 F www.bu rton-studio.com L Date Description OSi6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp sTS FO 5 7 Wm. S. urtan No.2135 y Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Hotel Entry Road Scale 1" = 20'-0" IT 0 05 10 20 40 L-2.3 179 © 2015 Gensler QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 V San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Landscape Architecture Studio Symbol Description 307 S cedrns Solana 13-1, Ca 92075 858 7 4 7204 T 858 794 7207 F < � '�7�ww.bu rton-studio.com `' Natural Landscape w Enhanced Desert Date Description Turf 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System Design Ordinance. 5 7 Wm. S. urton No. 2135 y KEY PLAN Project Name a „� PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES X Project Number ` -1- - SS 55.7598.000 \ \ / Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Residential Entry AH \ — f \PA4 �► � PA 2 H S I Snale IT �� 1" = 20'-0" ♦ .,10 ,a \� • �•� ,� l a 05 10 2a 40 � �.. L-2.4 G R � 180 © 2015 Gensler QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 V San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Landscape Architecture Studio Symbol Description 307 S cedrns Solana 13-1, Ca 92075 858 7 4 7204 T 858 794 7207 F < � '�7�ww.bu rton-studio.com `' Natural Landscape w Enhanced Desert Date Description Turf 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System `PQc""`NiT"''srgr Design Ordinance. 7 Wm. 5. urton No. 2135 y KEY PLAN Project Name a „� PA Mc L `\�PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES V A Project Number ` -1- - SS 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Typical Residental Landscape AH \\ �� PA 4 H1 H C ♦ PA 2 Swle � 1" = 20'-0" a 05 10 2a 40 L-2.5 GR 181 © 2015 Gensler 3S QUICK LEGEND & NOTES Trees & Palms Symbol Type Canopy Trees \J-t" Accent Trees Vertical Accents V Palms Shrubs Symbol Description Natural Landscape Enhanced Desert Turf Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System Design Ordinance. KEY PLAN PA MC L \ PA 2 \ CC - SS � 1 / AH \ �� \PA 4 HS ��H1 ► PA2 vo GR Z v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United states burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 eye 794 7— T 858 794 7207 F _ bu rton-studio.com Date Description 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 5 7 Wm. 5. urton No.2135 4tio Project Name ep 31 SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Silver Rock Way Entry Style 1" = 20'-0" IT 0 05 10 2a 40 L-2.6 182 © 2015 Gensler QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 V San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Landscape Architecture Studio Symbol Description 307 S cedrns Solana 13-1, Ca 92075 858 7 4 7204 T 858 794 7207 F < � '�7�ww.bu rton-studio.com `' Natural Landscape w Enhanced Desert Date Description Turf 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System `PQc""`NiT"''srgr Design Ordinance. 5 7 Wm. 5. urton No. 2135 y KEY PLAN Project Name a „� PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES X Project Number SS 55.7598.000 Description �� GG Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Shared Services Building AH H1 PA 4 �H S PA 2 I Snale �� 1" = 20'-0" IT♦ .♦10 ,a �f 07� l a 05 10 2a 40 �..- �' L-2.7 G R � 183 2015 Gensler Turf \ o \q\ j ash\ QUICK LEGEND & NOTES Trees & Palms Symbol Type Canopy Trees \J-t" Accent Trees Vertical Accents V Palms Shrubs Symbol Description Natural Landscape Enhanced Desert Turf Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System Design Ordinance. KEY PLAN — PA MC L PA \ CC ` SS AH PA 4 H1 HS► PA2 GR Z v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United states burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 eye 794 7— T 858 794 7207 F www.bu rton-studio.com Date Description 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 5 7 Wm. 5. urton No.2135 y Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Shared Services Building Style 1" = 20'-0" IT 0 05 10 20 40 L-2.8 184 © 2015 Gensler j� QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 v San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Landscape Architecture Studio Symbol Description 307 S cad... Solana 13-1, Ca 92075 858 1 1 7— T 8581911107 1 < � '�7�ww.bu rton-studio.com `' Natural Landscape w Enhanced Desert Date Description Turf 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System Design Ordinance. 5 7 Wm. S. urton No. 2135 y KEY PLAN Project Name a „� PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES X Project Number SS 55.7598.000 Description GG Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Typical Guestroom Landscape AH \ �� \PA 4 �H1 H S PA 2 Snale �� 1" = 20'-0" a 05 10 2a 40 L-2.9 G R 185 52015 Gensler QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 V San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Landscape Architecture Studio Symbol Description 307 S cedrns Solana 13-1, Ca 92075 858 7 4 7204 T 858 794 7207 F < � '�7�ww.bu rton-studio.com `' Natural Landscape w Enhanced Desert Date Description Turf 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System `PQEnec"iTEcr,srq Design Ordinance. 5 Wm. S. urtan No.2135 y KEY PLAN Project Name a ,n�. PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES Project Number ` -1- - SS 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Site Plan AH \ �� \PA 4 �H1 H S PA 2 I Snale �� 1" = 60'-0" �� • �.� 7� l a 15 30 60 120 GR SP - L-1.1 186 © 2015 Gensler QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 V San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Symbol Description Lend -ape Ar,hite,mre st„dm y p 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 858 794 7204 T 858 794 7207 F ElNatural Landscape w ww.bu rton-studio.com Enhanced Desert Date Description Turf 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System `PQc""`N T"7'sryr Design Ordinance. 5 7 Wm. S. urtan No. 2135 y KEY PLAN Project Name a „� PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES X Project Number ` -1- - SS 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Site Plan AH PA 4 �H1 H S PA 2 I Soale �� 1" = 60'-0" IT \� • �•♦ a 15 30 60 120 �— ♦� GR �v SP - L-1.2 87 © 2015 Gensler QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 V San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Landscape Architecture Studio Symbol Description 307 S cedrns Solana 13-1, Ca 92075 858 7 4 7204 T 858 794 7207 F < � '�7�ww.bu rton-studio.com `' Natural Landscape w Enhanced Desert Date Description Turf 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System Design Ordinance. 5 7 Wm. S. urtan No. 2135 y KEY PLAN Project Name a „� PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES X Project Number ` -1- - SS 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Site Plan AH PA 4 �H1 H S PA 2 I Snale �� 1" = 60'-0" IT \� • �•♦ ,� l a 15 30 60 120 GR �� v SP - L-1 188 © 2015 Gensler 9 �6� FXigtip— // CartP\ \ \ �,A-Tarp X: \ c Turf -- QUICK LEGEND & NOTES Trees & Palms Symbol Type Canopy Trees \J-t" Accent Trees GVertical Accents V Palms Shrubs Symbol Description Natural Landscape Enhanced Desert Turf Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System Design Ordinance. KEY PLAN PA MC L \ 1PA2 \ CC - SS 1 C 7 AH \ PA 4 �H1 HS► PA GR SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 858 794 7204 T 858 794 7207 F www.bu rton-studio.com Date Description 08-i6-2016 SDPSubmittal No.1 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/Signature C PpCNITEC7. 202`Pp srS FO 5 7 Wm. S. urton No.2135 o Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Site Plan Style 1" = 60'-0" 0 15 30 60 120 SP - L-1.4 89 0 © 2015 Gensler QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 V San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Landscape Architecture Studio Symbol Description 307 S cedrns Solana 13-1, Ca 92075 858 7 4 7204 T 858 794 7207 F < � '�7�ww.bu rton-studio.com `' Natural Landscape w Enhanced Desert Date Description Turf 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System `PQEnec"iTEcr,srq Design Ordinance. 5 Wm. S. urtan No. 2135 y KEY PLAN Project Name a ,n�. PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES X Project Number ` -1- - SS 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Site Plan AH PA 4 �H1 H S PA 2 I Snale �� 1" = 60'-0" IT • a 15 30 60 120 GR SP - L-1.5 90 © 2015 Gensler FOR MO ES LS HEIGH OF TING E L E C T R I C A L LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS NOTEALL SYMBOILS, ABBREVUNEi ARE NTECESSARLYICUSED ON THIS PROJECT (E) EXISTING TO REMAIN MAX MAXIMUM LIGHTING SWITCHING CONTROLS POWER DEVICES WIRING (F> FUTURE MCA MINIMUM CIRCUIT AMPERES (R) EXISTING TO BE REMOVED MFR MANUFACTURER (RL) EXISTING TO BE RELOCATED MIN MINIMUM AB ABOVE COUNTER BACKSPLASH MISC MISCELLANEOUS ACU AIR CONDITIONING UNIT MLO MAIN LUGS ONLY SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL S. DESCRIPTION SINGLE POLE SWITCH (SUPERSCRIPT DENOTES SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL DESCRIPTION o RECESSED 2X4 LUMINAIRE J7 �( SINGLE RECEPTACLE - WALL, CEILING, ON ALT. WIRING CONCEALED IN CEILING OR WALL. SIMILARLY MARKED LUMINAIRES CONTROLLED - - - LINE WEIGHT TOP TO BOTTOM= NEW, EXISTING AC ALTERNATING CURRENT MO MANUAL OPERATOR F SURFACE MOUNTED 2X4 LUMINAIRE TOGETHER) 3( -0 I0( DUPLEX RECEPTACLE - WALL, CEILING, ON ALT. TO REMAIN, FUTURE A, AMP AMPERES MTD MOUNTED Ss TWO POLE SWITCH ----- WIRING CONCEALED IN FLOOR OR UNDER GRADE MTR MOTOR AF AMPERE (RATED) FUSE OR -iNEUiRAL(GROUNDED CONDUCTOR) RECESSED 1X4 LUMINAIRE S THREE WAY SWITCH N( 4D � DOUBLE DUPLEX RECEPTACLE - WALL, CLG, ON ALT. --.--- OR ROUTED IN CEILING SPACE OF FLOOR BELOW. CB FRAME NC NORMALLY CLOSED 'On�� SPECIAL PURPOSE RECEPTACLE -WALL, CEILING LINE WEIGHT TOP TO BOTTOM= NEW, EXISTING TO REMAIN, FUTURE AFF ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AFG ABOVE FINISHED GRADE NEC NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 0 SURFACE MOUNTED 1X4 LUMINAIRE 5� FOUR WAY SWITCH L5-15R ON ALT. POWER; NEMA CONFIGURATION AS NOTED -,NEG NEGATIVE AL ALUMINUM (ALLOY) RECESSED 2X2 LUMINAIRE Sx KEY OPERATED SWITCH Ag RECEPTACLE TYPE SHOWN WALL -ABOVE COUNTER NEMA NATIONAL ELECTRICAL i ASSOC. ALC AUTOMATIC LIGHTING CONTROL NL NIGHT LIGHT (UNSWITCHED) BACKSPLASH. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. AS AMPERE (RATED) SWITCH NO NORMALLY OPEN ❑ SURFACE MOUNTED 2X2 LUMINAIRE D DIMMER SWITCH. NUMBER INDICATES WATTAGE "ON ALT." SHADED RECEPTACLES NOTED 'ON ALT." ABOVE ARET EXISTING WIRING TO BE REMOVED AT CIRCUIT BRKR TRIP SETTING NIS NOT TO SCALE SHADING OF ANY LUMINAIRE INDICATES CONNECTION RATING. IF NOT SHOWN THEN EQUAL TO LOAD. CONNECTED TO ALTERNATE POWER SOURCE (EMERG., —T— TELEPHONE SYSTEM CONDUIT ATS AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH AUTO AUTOMATIC NP NAMEPLATE Lid • TO ALTERNATE POWER SOURCE (EMERGENCY, UPS, STANDBY, UPS, ETC.) PER CIRCUITING INDICATED —MV— MEDIUM VOLTAGE CONDUIT AUX AUXILIARY OC ON CENTER STANDBY, ETC.) PER CIRCUITING INDICATED Sr MOTOR -RATED THERMAL OVERLOAD SWITCH AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE OD OUTSIDE DIAMTER DUPLEX RECEPTACLE - WALL - HALF SWITCHED BARE GROUNDING GRID OR CONDUCTORS, UON. BAT BATTERY OFCI OWNER FURNISHED CONTRACTOR —G— _ GC_ 0 SUSPENDED LINEAR LUMINAIRE SIZE VARIES ( ) PC PHOTOCELL GROUNDING CONDUCTOR(S) ROUTED IN CODE SIZED BG BELOW GRADE INSTALLED OF01 OWNER FURNISHED, OWNER COMBINATION SWITCH/DUPLEX RECEPTACLE CONDUIT, UON. C CONDUIT (CIRCULAR RACEWAY) INSTALLED t� WALL MOUNTED LINEAR LUMINAIRE (SIZE VARIES) '❑' EQUIPMENT OPERATOR PUSH BUTTON STATION. STROKES INDICATE QUANTITY OF #12 AWG, CAB CABINET OS OCCUPANCY SENSOR PROVIDED WITH EQUIPMENT, INSTALLED AND DUPLEX RECEPTACLE -WALL - WITH INTEGRAL CONDUCTORS, LION. NOTE: WIRING STROKES FOR CB CIRCUIT BREAKER P POLE ® SUSPENDED PENDANT LUMINAIRE (SIZE VARIES) CONNECTED BY ELECTRICAL, LION. GFl GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER 20A BRANCH CIRCUITS ARE NOT SHOWN ON -DRAWINGS. CBI CENTRAL BATTERY INVERTER PB PUSHBUTTON CONTRACTOR SHALL USE INFORMATION CKT CIRCUIT pH, PHASE RECESSED DOWNUGHT, CEILING MOUNTED PUSHBUTTON OR PUSHBUTTONS, BY ELECTRICAL. WP RECEPT. TYPE SHOWN W/ WEATHERPROOF COVER IN PANEL AND BRANCH CIRCUIT SCHEDULES TO CLG CEILING PNL PANEL TC TIME CLOCK AND INTEGRAL GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER PROVIDE REQUIRED CIRCUITING. CO CONDUIT ONLY +,POS POSITIVE O SURFACE DOWNUGHT, CEILING MOUNTED GROUND CPT CONTROL POWER TRANSFORMER REQD REQUIRED �— OS OCCUPANCY SENSOR -WALL MOUNTED +42" RECEPT. TYPE SHOWN AT SPECIAL HEIGHT CT CURRENT TRANSFORMER CU COPPER RNC RIGID NON-METALLIC CONCUIT (PVC) ww oieEcriou-► RECESSED WALLWASH GROUND, ISOLATED DC DIRECT CURRENT IRS RAPID START —� 360 DEGREE OCCUPANCY SENSOR -CEIDNG MID. WALL MOUNTED ELECTRICAL CONNECTION TO HOT DISC DISCONNECT S.A.D. SEE ARCHITECTURAL RECTURAL DRAWINGS t ww oiPECTI_ SURFACE WALLWASH ELECTRIFIED FURNITURE. PROVIDE 8 WIRES NEUTRAL DIA DIAMETER SEC SECONDARY t g4 180 DEGREE OCCUPANCY SENSOR - CEILING MID. ( 4 HOTS, 1 DEDICATED NEUTRAL, 1 COMMON DIV DIVISION SPDT SINGLE POLE DOUBLE THROW ®T RECESSED LINEAR WALLWASH L�Imo' `�f' CORRIDOR/AISLE OCCUPANCY SENSOR -CEIDNG NEUTRAL, 1 ISOLATED GROUND) NEUTRALS HOME RUN WIRING TO INDICATED DESTINATION, SPST SINGLE POLE SINGLE THROW DPDT DOUBLE POLE DOUBLE THROW SWBD SWITCHBOARD SURFACE LINEAR WALLWASH MOUNTED TO BE #10 AWG. USE LIQUID -TIGHT FLEX. 3 3/4"C. MIN. R AS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONTRACTOR DPST DOUBLE POLE SINGLE THROW SWGR SWITCHGEAR COMBINATION OCCUPANCY SENSOR &SWITCH L1A-1,3 SHALL USE CIRCUIT SIZES NOTED IN RESPECTIVE I DWG DRAWING TB TERMINAL BOARD J L�-' RECESSED WALL MOUNTED LUMINARE GANGED UNDER A COMMON COVER PLATE. CLOCK HANGER RECEPTACLE HD1A SCHEDULES AND INFORMATION IN THE FEEDER AND E,EMERG EMERGENCY TEL TELEPHONE OS OCCUPANT SENSOR TO CONTROL ALL LUMINAIRES IN BRANCH CIRCUIT SCHEDULES. EF EXHAUST FAN TYP TYPICAL �3= TRACK LIGHTING WITH HEADS AS INDICATED. ROOM WITH 1/2 LIGHT REDUCTION CONTROLLED BY CONDUIT RUN TURNED UP THROUGH FLOOR OR EMT ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING ENCL ENCLOSURE UL UNDERWRITERS LAB ®7 RECESSED CEILING ADJUSTABLE POINT SOURCE SWITCH, DESIGNATED BY LETTER. 2-GANG BOX WITH ❑® FLUSH FLOOR BOX DEVICE - DEVICE TYPE PER SYMBOLS ABOVE CEILING. CORE & FIREPROOF AS REQUIRED. EO ELECTRICALLY OPERATED LION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED SINGLE -GANG MUDRING, LION SPECIFIED EOL END OF LINE UPS UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY oa SURFACE CEILING ADJUSTABLE POINT SOURCE 4 O THERMOSTAT -WALL. CEILING. PROVIDED BY MECHANICAL, INSTALLED AND WIRED BY ELECTRICAL. ❑® PEDESTAL FLOOR DEVICE - DEVICE TYPE PER CONDUIT RUN TURNED DOWN THROUGH FLOOR OR CEILING. CORE & FIREPROOF AS REQUIRED. EWC ELECTRIC WATER COOLER V VOLTS EWH ELECTRIC WATER HEATER VA VOLT-AMPERES 4 WALL MOUNTED LUMINAIRE SYMBOLS ABOVE CONDUIT STUBBED OUT AT LOCATION SHOWN. VIED VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE FA FIRE ALARM W WATT E2 L� WALL MOUNTED DIRECTIONAL (SIZE VARIES) EPO EMERGENCY POWER OFF, HEAVY-DUTY, OIL -TIGHT RED MUSHROOM -HEAD PUSHBUTTON W/ GUARD. Q POKE THRU UNIT WITH DUPLEX RECEPTACLE - PROVIDE INSULATED BUSHING &. PULLROPE. FC FOOT CANDLES FLA FULL LOAD AMPERES W/ WITH FLUSH, PEDESTAL MOUNTED. TELEPHONE//DATA SLEEVE THROUGH WALL, ABOVE FLEX FLEXIBLE W/0 WITHOUT Ili FLUORESCENT -POWER FEED SECTION, I� LCP ? LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL AND ASSOCIATED COMPONENTS. PROVIDE 120V OR 277V CONTROL ®® ® ® POKE THRU UNIT WITH DOUBLE DUPLEX � CEILING. E)tTEND TO ACCESSIBLE TILE CLG. BOTH SIDES. TERMINATE WITH BUSHINGS. f11 1.25' CO FPB FAN POWERED BOX WP WEATHERPROOF FSD FIRE/SMOKE DAMPER XFR TRANSFORMER 3 I—� FEED THROUGH SECTION. LENGTH AS SHOWN. SECTION. POWER AS REQUIRED OR AS INDICATED. RECEPTACLE - FLUSH, PEDESTAL MOUNTED. UON. COORDINATE LOCATIONS WITH CABLE FU FUSE '. IN INCHES INSTALLER(S) PRIOR TO ROUGH -IN. GUN GENERATOR, FT FEET I--�i WALL MOUNTED FLUORESCENT STRIPLIGHT TX REMOTE MOUNTED LINE TO LOW -VOLTAGE FUSED COMBO POKE THRU UNIT WITH DUPLEX RECEPTACLE AND TELEPHONE OUTLET -FLUSH, GFl GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER UNDERCABINET FLUORESCENT STRIPLIGHT TRANSFORMER. CONCEAL FROM VIEW. PEDESTAL MOUNTED. BASKET TYPE CABLE TRAY WITH 90 DEGREE ELBOW GND GROUND CONTINUOUS LINEAR SOURCE (LED, COLD CATHODE, © ROOM CONNECTOR. SEE SHEET E9.1. ®V ®� MULTI -SERVICE FLOOR BOX CAST IN GONG. OR SHOWN GRAP GENERATOR REMOTE ANNUNCIATOR PNL GRC GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL CONDUIT NEON, FIBER OPTIC, ETC...) IN RAISED FLOOR - SEE ARCH DWGS; WITH RECEPTACLES & SIGNAL OUTLETS AS NOTED. LADDER TYPE CABLE TRAY WITH 90 DEGREE ELBOW SHOWN HLO HANDLE LOCK -ON (OFF) HP HORSEPOWER Y I BATTERY POWER EMERGENCY UNIT EQUIPMENT (SEE POKE THRU UNIT WITH JUNCTION BOX. JUNCTION BOXES, WALL, CEIUNG AND FLUSH FLOOR HPF HIGH POWER FACTOR HTR HEATER LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE FOR QUANTITY OF HEADS) - RACEWAY COMPONENTS RC-700 SERIES. MOUNTED. 4" SQ. BOX MIN., LARGER IF REQUIRED HZ HERTZ (CYCLES PER SECOND) WALL, CEILING MOUNTED. J WIRING EXTENSION POINT -CONDUIT TO MC CABLE OR MANUFACTURED WIRING SYSTEM J-BOX ABOVE G ID INSIDE DIAMETER IISOLATED GROUND Q q ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGN, SHADED QUADRANT INDICATES FACES, ARROWS AS SHOWN TELE/POWER POLE, POWER POLE ® ® ACCESSIBLE CEIUNGS AREAS, OR EXTEND CONDUIT & METAL IMC INTERMEDIATE CONDUIT ® BOLLARD (� TELE/POWER POLE WITH WHIP CONNECTION TO WIRE IN EXPOSED OR "HARD" CEILING AREAS. SHADED= ALT. POWER SOURCE (EMERG,UPS,ETC.) K KEY OPERATED KCMIL THOUSAND CIRCULAR MILS era ELECTRIFIED FURNITURE PB ❑ NiON PULL BOX, MIN. SIZE PER LION. KO KNOCK OUT KW KILOWATTS POLE MOUNTED LUMINAIRE- SINGLE OR DUAL HEAD UNDERFLOOR RACEWAY KVA KILOVOLT -AMPERES INDICATES ROTATED OPTICS DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT Q�� SURFACE METAL RACEWAY WITH RECEPTACLES RECEPTACLES AS NOTED, LENGTH AS FLEXIBLE CONDUIT CONNECTION LTG UGHTING ® POST TOP MOUNTED LUMINAIRE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND WITH ALL FITTIN GS AS REQUIRED. ® ® POWER CONNECTION TO FIRE/SMOKE DAMPER. REFER TO FSD CONNECTION DETAIL IF NOT SHOWN LCP LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL SYMBOL DESCRIPTION BRANCH CIRCUIT PANELBOARDS, SURFACE AND RECESS MOUNTED, SOLID= 120/280V, HATCHED= 277/480V, DASHEEDD EQUIP. =FUTURE IN -GRADE POINT SOURCE J TWO OR THREE COMPARTMENT SURFACE METAL RACEWAY WITH RECEPTACLES AND OUTLETS AS ® GARAGE LIGHTING LUMINAIRE WITH CUTOFF LOUVERS - INDICATED, LENGTH AS INDICATED ON THE CONTROL CENTER /CODE CLEARANCES PROVIDE ALL FITTINGS AS LUMINAIRE MARKING CONVENTION LEGEND: ®. _ SHOWN, DASHED EQUIP.=FUTURE REQUIRED. HA HA = LUMINAIRE TYPE IDENTIFICATION. SEE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE. 3c =CIRCUIT NUMBER VIA LOCAL SWITCH TRANSFORMER WITH CODE CLEARANCES SHOWN ELECTRICAL DESIGN CRITERIA ELECTRICAL DRAWING LIST 3c HA (LOWERCASE LETTER) THAT SERVES THE LUMINIARE. -- 3A =CIRCUIT NUMBER/UPPERCASE LETTER -' SERVICE AND/OR DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT WITH CODE CLEARANCES SHOWN 3A COMBINATION INDICATES LOW VOLTAGE --------------- SHEET DESCRIPTION RELAY OR LIGHTING CONTACTOR THAT CONNECTION TO MOTOR PROVIDED BY OTHERS 1. CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; 2013 EDITION SERVES THE LUMINAIRE E0.0 ELECTRICAL LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS VFD CONNECTION TO MECHANICAL FURNISHED VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE WITH INTEGRAL DISCONNECT 2. CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE: 2013 EDITION WITH NFPA 72, 2008 EDITION E0.1 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES AND DIAGRAMS ELECTRICAL TO INSTALL VFD EQUIPMENT 3. CAUFORNIA BUILDING CODE: 2013 EDITION E11.0 OVERALL SITE LIGHTING PLAN �-L1 LJ DISCONNECT SWITCH, SIZE AS NOTED IF NOT SHOWN SIZE PER CONNECTED MOTOR SZE AND SIZE MOTOR DISCONNECT SCHEDULE ¢, AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, (ADA) E7.1 MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER, SHARED SERVICES SITE LIGHTING PLAN (MCI) i LUXURY HOTEL & HOTEL SPA SITE UGHTING PLAN (H1) REFERENCE SYMBOLS E1.3 GUESTROOMS SITE LIGHTING PLAN (TER, IJ Q❑-I FUSED DISCONNECT SWITCH, SIZE AS NOTED. SIZE FUSE PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS ENCLOSED CIRCUIT BREAKER DISCONNECT SWITCH, TRIP SIZE AS NOTED. 5. CAUFORNIA ENERGY CODE: 2013 TITLE-24, PART 6. E1.4 MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER, SHARED SERVICES 517E LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN (MCI) E1.5 LUXURY HOTEL & HOTEL SPA SITE UGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN (i SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 12 KEYED NOTE REFERENCE 1 BRANCH CIRCUIT OR FEEDER NOMINAL AMPACITY & DISCONNECT W/ MAGNETIC MOTOR STARTER E1.6 GUESTROOMS SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN (GR7) .4 TYPE; REFER TO BRANCH CIRCUIT AND FEEDER SCHEDULES FOR WIRE AND CONDUIT SIZES & QTY. (CONTROLLER) OR CONTACTOR. S1ZE PER LOAD SERVED. NEMA SIZE #1 MINIMUM. GENERAL NOTES e REFER TO DETAIL NO. ON DRAWING INDICATED NOT ALL DETAIL REFERENCES ARE SHOWN. ALL ® MAGNETIC MOTOR STARTER (CONTROLLER) OR CONTACTOR. SIZE PER LOAD SERVED. E4.1 DETAILS APPLY TO ALL APPLICABLE SITUATIONS, UON. NEMA SIZE #1 MINIMUM. 1. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ELECTRICAL GEAR, EQUIPMENT AND 2 8 ELECTRICAL CONNECTION, EQUIPMENT PROVIDED BY MATERIALS. ELEVATION TAG: REFER TO ELEVATION NUMBER ON OTHERS. SHADED = ON ALT. POWER SOURCE NOTED E4.1 DRAWING INDICATED Eiii gip ELECTRICAL CONNECTION TO EQUIPMENT WITH INTEGRAL DISCONNECT THAT IS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. SHADED = ON ALT. POWER SOURCE NOTED 2 SECTION TAG: REFER TO SECTION NUMBER ON DRAWING INDICATED EQUIPMESURFACENT OR TERMINAL LIRE AS NOTED, E4 1 AND RECESS MOUNTED �r BUILDING GROUND BUS, SEE DETAILS K11 KITCHEN EQUIPMENT REFERENCE, REFER TO KITCHEN DM CH 1 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION TAG Df$ DAMPER MOTOR BUSWAY RISER EQUIP NAME EQUIPMENT BY OTHERS IDENTIFICATION TAG <« BUSWAY STAB -IN TYPE CIRCUIT BREAKER OR FUSE DISCONNECT. SIZE AS NOTED. SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway To 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States GLUMAC en9in e e re fore aas re lne ale lurure T. i916.934.6103 mjec PManager .1-1he Culver EnogineerNesigner CC 3e rv„mmf 12,16.Po907 0 Data Description 5.16.2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 1048-20% SDP Submittal No.3 Seal l Signature OQAOFESS/pH�Y .9�>0 CO E , ION f�'YtfOi t1l\iDa�\ Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description ELECTRICAL LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS Sale ASSHOWN T E0.0 191 m 2015 Gensler LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE LAMPS TYPE IMAGE MANUFACTURER, MODEL&CATALOG DESCRIPTION MOUNTING VOLTS REMARKS LUMENS, NUMBER TYPE COLOR, CRI WATTS Al BEGA #77 263 LED BOLLARD SURFACE 277 LED 3000K 5 TO INCLUDE 300VA 12V TRANSFORMER Bl BK LIGHTING NITE STAR WITH LINEAR SPREAD #NSII-LED-e64-WFL SIGN ACCENT LIGHT SURFACE 277 LED 2700K 7 C1 Q-TRAN LINEAR GRAZE #IQA-VEGA LINEAR LED GRAZER DOWN THE WALL SURFACE 277 LED 2700K EXTRUSION 15DEG C2 Q-TRAN LINEAR IP67 #iQ67-27-50-2.6 LINEAR LED UNDERBENCH SURFACE 277 LED 2700K 2.61 Dl BK LIGHTING NITE STAR##NS-LED-e64WFL TREE ACCENT UP LIGHT SURFACE 277 LED 2700K 7 FIXTURE TO BE MOUNTED INSIDE BOTTOM Fi TMS LIGHTING. —IN. #1005P-10 DECORATIVE LED LANTERN SURFACE 277 LED 2700K 15 OF LANTERN TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT Gl BK LIGHTING DELTA STAR#DS-Li LED TRELLIS ACCENT SURFACE 277 LED 2700K 7 H1 BK LIGHTING HP2#HP2-LED-TR-e64WFL TREE INGRADE UPLIGHT INGRADE 277 LED 27-K 7 Ai a BKLIGHN-LE.TING ICRONITESTAR #RM-25-MN-LEDafi7-NFL-BZP-12-E TREE SUSPENDED DOWNLIGHT TREE RING 277 LED 2700K 7 K1 PENTAIR#LD-211-350 UNDERWATER LED LIGHT RECESSED 3/277 LED 3000K 26 93CRI K2 ,j�l� LIGHTGRAPHIX#LD-DR-350/LWWMB UNDERWATER LED UPLIGHT RECESSED 31277 LED 3000K 12 93CRI Ll BK DENALI WIPOWER CANOPY #DE-LED-x30-FL-PC ROOF MOUNTED FLOOD LIGHT SURFACE 277 LED 27-K 29 L2 BK DENALI W/POWER PIPE GROUND MOUNTED FLOOD LIGHT SURFACE 277 LED 2700K 29 #DE-LED-FL-x30-PPII Mi LUCIFER STEP LIGHT#ISL-ALED-2.7K-NL RECESSED LED STEP LIGHT RECESSED 277 LED 2700K 3.2 WALL N1 METEOR#SH2O0 INGRADE SOLAD LED INGRADE NA LED 27MK NA SOLAR POWERED 01 TIMES SQUARE#LED80P GOBO LIGHT SURFACE 120 LED N/A 80 16OW TOTAL POWER SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway To 619.'57.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States GLUMAC en9l a e e ra for Laas t J lne a le future 1 T.916.934.6193 P_. Manager .1-1ne Culver EnogineerNesigner CC Ja Number. 12.16.Pa907 0 Data Description 5-16.2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal Ne.2 10481 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal l Signature OQAOFESS/pH�� 9 � CIO ION f�'�tf0i t1l\iDa�\ Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES AND DIAGRAMS Sale ASSHOWN T E0.1 192 m 2015 Gensler OVERALL SITE LIGHTING PLAN ■■■■ I i ■uuu■ KEYED NOTES KEY PLAN r — PA 3 L PA cc CC SS AH �� PA a H1 PA 2 HS 2� I GR SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 &oadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States GLUMAC en gineer. to.....t. n. bil We re T sfasaaro3su Project Manager ne Culver engineerrDesfgner: C A Date Description 5-16.2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2111 SDP Submittal No, 2 10.18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal I Signature oIt US$/pp� g A CO g ION f�'ftFof ickia�\ Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description OVERALL SITE LIGHTING PLAN Scale ASSHOWN T E1.0 193 02015 Gensler I- 0 s MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER, & SHARED SERVICES SITE LIGHTING PLAN SCALE: 1 "-50' r� NOON OOOO i . NNNNNNOO KEYED NOTES KEY PLAN r — —\ PA nflc L �PA 2 cc CC SS 1 / AH I PA H1 PA 2 HS I GR SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.'57.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States GLUMAC .ne�n.er. for L•a 1 n•me "more T.I916.934.5103 9 Pmjec Manager chw1he Cover En�g'Neue��es 9ner CC a .16.P0g07 A Data Description 5-16.2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.16-20% SDP Submittal No.3 Sea i I Signature oQQ,OFES3/pp� 9N CO g —ION f�'ftFOf C1l\foal\ Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER, & SHARED SERVICES SITE LIGHTING PLAN Sale ASSHOWN T E1.1 194 2015 36n6 / / / / / j MATCHLINE _ , MATCHLINE \\\\ KEYS 7 =I LUXURY HOTEL & HOTEL SPA SITE LIGHTING PLAN 1 SCALE: 1 =50' 0 25' 50' 100, KEY PLAN r — PA 3 L PA cc CC SS AH �� PAa H1 HS PA 2 ■ �� GR SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 &oadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States GLUMAC .ng-- tor..u.tana.i. metre MI GI— T sfasaasro3so Protect Manager ne CNver engineerrDesis— C A Data Description 5-16.2016 SDP Submittal No.1 OB-19.2111 SDP Submittal No, 2 10.18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal I Signature oIt US$/pp� g A CO g ION f�'ftFof ickia�\ Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description LUXURY HOTEL & HOTEL SPA SITE LIGHTING PLAN Scale ASSHOWN T E1.2 195 5 Gensler A GUESTROOMS SITE LIGHTING PLAN ki SCALE: 1 "=50' 0 25' W. 100' KEYED NOTES KEY PLAN r — PA 3 L PA cc CC SS AH �� PA a ;yH1 ' PA 2 HS "so '11sastis GR SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 &oadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States GLUMAC ..ei...r, r...... t. la..i. future MIGI- T sfasaas�o3su Project Manager ne Culver engineerrDesfgner: C A Date Description 5-16.2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2111 SDP Submittal No, 2 10.18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal I Signature oIt US$/pp� g A CO g ION f�'ftFof ickia�\ Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description GUESTROOMS SITE LIGHTING PLAN Scale ASSHOWN T E1.3 196 02015 Gensler 0.0 0.0 b..0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. � .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0'\ -6 0 '4 0 O 0 a� 0. p 01"0 b. 0 ��0 . 0 0 Op0 *0 . g 0. 0 0. 0 �(�HtO 0 fl 0. + 0 0 0 0. 0 0. 0 � AVERAGE=0. (Fc) a; + b i - -- - AVERAGE-49.0 18 + + + + + `. + '+ + + + *0 + + '0 MAXIMUM=49.0 0 h + F + 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MINIMUM=o.o 0 0.0 0,0 0.0 + 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0, 0.0 0 0 0.RL 0� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.2 0 J�5.650I 00 0.0 0.� 0.0 0. Op0.0 00 0,0 0.0 10.01... d.00o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.1 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 161.40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 o e. 0. '0,� 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0' m.0 0.4 0.0 0.0;0.9 0.0 1 0 4° 3 . OI . IO 1. s 0. 1 a.- 0 0.0 0.0 0. D 0_. 0 0 0 0. 0 3�' o ._ +TO � + +p - � ,+0.0 + 0 0 G�„0 P2.40.0 0.0 3.7 0.>e 0. /+ 0 0.0 .0 0. �.0�0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.� 0� I 0OO� O0 0.0 0.002.8 0.(P00. 0.0 0.0 0.0 (A.0 0.0A ( 0A.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0'.0 0.0 0.0 2. AD 0, + 0 +.1 + 0 .0 0.Q40:0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0. + p 9 + + 0.0 0 . 0.0 +0.0 {0.0 0 0 0.0 0 .<Q o .d1, {0.1 O . b 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 1. 0.0 b : D . 0 0.0 + Q . 0 4 0 .0 0.0 0.0 + A17p.) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.0 0:0 0.0 0 + - 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0..m'0.0 0. + 0 1.6 0 0-0. 0.0 0-SA 0?0 0.0 0.0-0.0 + 0 0.0 Ce2 0.0 �0.0-la,0 0.0 0. p 0 0:0' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24. 0.0 0.0/ d 0 0.0 '1.0 0.0 0.0 L o 0.1 0 �a o. \0 0.0 0 0. oro o.0 0.3 0.� o z o,ao o.0 0 n 0:© o. o o,o o.p o.o o:o o.o �.o o.o o. �P _ :i (tom + + # } # + # o.o o.o o:o +o.o obi a o.o +o.o o.o 'o o a.1 0.0 0.0 'o.o o.o o.o o.o q o o%/ o o.o 0 0.� o 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 o:e o.o �!g o�.o o. 0 0.3 ,0 0.o fl,�_0.0 0. o.o o. o.o o.o o.o oo.o 0 0 0_0 0 0 0,.0 o.fl o_ o 0 0_0 0 0.0 0.0 o r + o + �+ + 0 0 0.0 0.0 2.3 0 0 0 0. o. 0 )0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0.0 + 1 0+ .0 0 0 2i0,0 + 1 0-d0 0 0+ +p \ / / / °- + + + + ? + + / + + + + + + + + 0. 0 0.0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0. 0 0., O q. 0 \ 0 0. 0 0/. Oi 0 (3)pOC� . 5 0. 0 . 0 ff 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0 0 2 0 0 .0 0. 0 0\0 0. 0 0. 0' 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 +.\ 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.D 0.0 +0.0 0 .0 Q y�. 0. 0.0 0.0 @.0 0�0 0. .9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0..0 0 4_-0.0 0 0. / +� + 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0 (�.p 0. 0: / \ 0 Q. 1 0 0 +0.0 0.0/ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + .-0 0. O e3 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0. �++0.0 ° + j 10 0.0 0.�0' 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0. +0.0 + .0 0. 0 + . 0 0 . 0 t1>•) 0.0 0.0 0 . 0 0 0. 0 0 y0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 )S 0 0': - �+ 0 0 .5 0 . 0.0.0 0.0 0 . 0.0 0.0.0 +0.0 +Do. .0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0 0 0.0 0., 0 0.0 1 0. 0 �.0 0 0.0 0. 0.0/0.0 0 0/ 0 0.0 0.0 +.0 0.0 p.0 + 0 0 .0 0.0 0.0 +. - 0. 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0I0 0.0 0.0 i3> 7 + F s)D� 0 0,1 1 t 0 0.0 .0 0. 0/ .0 + 0 0.0 0.0 0. j 0.o 0.0 0.0 0 '0.0 .0 0. -- -} 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0. 0.0 + . 0.0 + .0 0 .0 + .0 + 0 + 0, - 0 2; ¢ 0.0 0.0 D' 0 0 0¢ 1 0.0. 0 7..4 .5 .0 + 0 jO. 0.0 0 O.O 0, rO Jk7 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0 0 0.0 + .0 0) 0''(�0 0.0 0 0.0 .0 0.0 + . 0 0 . + . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 " 0.0 0 . %M O "5 a' O (� DOt� 0.1 - 0.0 0.0 ( o . Q. o O . o o . + + o +0.0 0 0 o 10.0 0.9 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0 + + + + + + -.-- - Q + l + + + I / + + . o +. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 +.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o o.o o.o o.o +0.0 0.o ?z. ; 0 0 0.0 0. +�0 b.o 0 0 0 0�0:0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 + o + + + + + + + + + + + + nn_r. + + 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.o O.o T�1 0.1 0.0 0 0 0.0 O.�Q.0 0 0.0 0. .0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0 0. 0 +.0 + 0. :) (3)D1 � U. - / / i 0.0 0 0'fl. �0 �y0 0 0 ° 0 0,0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.a0 0.1 . (s)Et.2 0. A--0.0 0.0 0.0 0.o'0. 0.o +0.0 0.0 0 .0 0.0 .0 0. 0. 0.0 �\ 0. `+41)aI q.0 0. 0 0.0 u ' 'I (6 a' 0.0 0 . 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.p,1.9 o o.o O.o + I � ,l 0.0p-� ��00.0+.00.0 00 �L i o O O'0.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0 p.0 0.0 0.0 0°.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 +.0 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. .0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 +.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0. 0.0 0.0 0 . +0.0 0.0 0.0 +0 .0 0 0 0.0 + 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0. 0. 0.0 0. .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 ;n p + + + ), + + 0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0. 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 O.E�W -0.0 0®A 1 0.1 3.1/0.3 0.0 @. Q 0 0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0 0.0 �+ 0 (1 �y 0 0.0 0.0 + 0,0 .0 +. +.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.u�.O-0.0 O.rO(Zt0.0 _0.0 0.0 0 0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0 0. o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o. o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o wo u.o o.o Flo. _0- 0.0 0.0 0. + 0.0 (3)DS r{ � hh ® Dt 0 0. 0 + . 0.0 0.0 + 0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0 . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 . 0 0 .0 0('Z�) 2: . 0 0 .0 ,0 . 0" 0.0 0.0 + . 0 0.0 .0 (2)D1. d J'i 1. 0 0.0 0.0 +.0 .0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.(°0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.(2)h4.o f�>Pi +0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 e f fi)D1 0 0.0 + 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 V-1T.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0. + 0 0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0.0 0.0 +.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-,0 010.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 +.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 '.o ' o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 +. .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0. 0. +.0 0.0 0 0.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 'o.o o.0 0:0 0.0 . o 0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 .0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 .o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .o o.o 0.0 0.0 +.o o. 0.0 +.o 0.0 0.0 .o 0.0 0.0 0.0 .o 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. +.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0. +. 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0. +0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o. +.o o.o o.o o.o o. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER, & SHARED SERVICES SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN KEYED NOTES KEY PLAN r - -\ PA ^IVlt,c L \�PA2 l.i CC \ SS AH �s�� \PA4 ,c H1 PA 2 HS 1114 GR SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 F.. 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States GLUMAC 1191,111,for I'usW"ols?'lure T. 916a345103 9 P pclM p CM1nst ne C'Nar Eob Numb r' r 1216 OW A Date Description 5.16-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2015 SDP SubmMal W.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal l Signature oQQOFES9lON�� El s�A CO teI ION rglf OF tPl\t�Q� Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER, & SHARED SERVICES SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN Scale AS SHOWN E 1.4 197 © 2015 Gem MATCHLINE _ MATCHLINE ° MATCHLi'RE� ( 7 \ a _ INE \ / 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,70 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0/ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 o.o o.o +.o o.o ' o.o o.o o. o ' o.o o.o '0.0 0 0.:0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 'o.o 0.0 0: ' I.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o. o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o. .00.00 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00 0.O0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0a.00.0a.00.0a.00.00.00.00.00.0 + / 6. + o 6.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 6.0 0.0 0.0 o.o + 0-0.0 +0.0 0.0 0�0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + o o.b o.o'a.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o .o o.o o.o o. o.o 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o�,e o. o.o o. 0 0 0.0 0 �p.o D-0.o o',o +o.o b ®o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o +.o o.o o.0 0 0 '.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0.0 0. o o.o o. o.0 0.0 0 0 ".00 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 'o,0 0.0 0.0'Q. :0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. o.o 0.0 0.0 +0.0 +.o 9 ;'4e 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0 ro o 0.0 0.0 0.0 `.o o.o In �0 0 In 0 aHo(TfP)O 0.0 +0. - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 .�o,' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0 .0 0 Ori .0 0.0 0.0 In n + .010. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .00,0006 0.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0'V..0' IIi 0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 F. 0+ 0 � 0 0 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 bY3 20 .;0 3� .� 0.0 '0.0 0. 0 0 0 0. 10. 0 0. .0 0. 0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 0. 0 0. 0 '0.0 '0.0 0. 0+ CJ r F � 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 :0.0.0 9:0;C 0 - .0 0. 0 0.0--- o.o o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. o.o o. o.o L1 -----7 Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0• +.0 0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. .0 0.0 0 + 0. .0 0. 0 + 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0. +o. o.,o. o. + 4 .o o. +.o� +.0 0 0�0 0 0 0.0 0 '� o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o:o o.o o.o L_ I I ° 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 + o. 0. 0.0 w0 0. 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ILLUMINANCE (FC) 0.0 0. .0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 . 0 n' +. 0 0 0. 0+ 0+ 0. .0 0.0 6. 0 0. 0 0 0. 0+. 0 0.0 0.0 AVERAGE=0.07 - (2) ` \ + + �+ MAXIMUM=19.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0. 0.0 0,0 .4 0:0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0,0.0 0. 0.0 0,0 9.0 0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 MINIMUM=0.0 ' ` 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0 2 10 FO 0.0 0.0 10 F0 0 0 0 0. 0 +.0 0.0 0.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +.0 0.0 0 0 3 0 1 0.0 0.0 0% 0.1 0 0 0.0 0 O b + 0 0 0.0 0. 0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0. +(18)K1 I C d 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.000. 0.0 M1 y0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0 0.0 +0 �� 0 0; \ .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 \ + 0.0 o.0 o.0 o.0 0.0 o.0 o.0 o.0 0. 0 0 + .0 + 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 + + .0 0.0 + .0 0.0 0. 0�0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 F �F1 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0 0: s o o:a 0.0 o:oo: o lo.o .o ' 1y o o.o o.o o. o:``o. �o o.o q.o o.o 10.0 o.9w o.o o.o o.o o. o.o o.o o.o +.0 o.o 0 0.0 0.0 ' oo \.o :® o.0 0.0 0.0 0. � !� EMI 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 .0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 . 0 6 0 a� 6 5 6�d1. 0 0 .0 0.0 0.0 0. 0! aQ 3a :Q�' .a 0 0.0 0 . 0 Q 0 0 0 . �0.0 0.0 ji 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 o.0 o.0 0.0 0 0. 9 '0.1 o.0 0.0 0:0 o.0 0.0 aj9gl4@ 10.0 + 0. 0 0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 Oa0.0.. 0- (6),11 o.' (6)11 a;. ,i �p (2)D1 0 o.o o.o +0.0 +o.0 0.o o +o.0 +o.0 0.o'0 ��:3'0.0 0:0 +0.0 0:0 '0.0 '0:� 19,70.0 +0.0 .0 .0 +.0 +0.0 +0. �0. 0 0.0 O.Q`+ +0.o 0.0 0.o b.0 o.o o +0.0 +.0 0.o +0. 0.0 0-LD 0 0-0.0 0;0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 . o- a _•,0, .0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0o `� o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 o.o o.0 o.o.o.o o.o o. 07 .0.0 011a� oa o o\ C o 1<° 0 , 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 + . 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 -0 .0 0. .0 + 0 0.0 � ` , • 1 ,.0 .1 (¢)W 0 . 0 + 0 + y{�: 0� 0 � ' 0 0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o +.o o.o o.o o o. o. +�� 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. o+ 0.0 0. o. o +.Ev o + 0 0.0 0.0 �p 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.0 o. 0.0 0`D 0.2 0.0 0.0 01i0 0.0 + �0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0+. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 11 . (2)610 U. (�" 0(.2)D10 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 0. 0 0. 0.0 0.0 ti 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 6. a.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0\ 0 `13 G +.0 + 0. 0 0.0 0.0 + 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0. o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.o o.o o.o 0 o.o o.o o. d 0 0 0.0 o.o0.0o.00.0o.0o.00. 9.00.o+ oo.0o:00.00.o+ o+o o.o .00.00.00.000+0+ o. ' \ 6 \ o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.0 � o.o O.o o.o o.o o.o o.o b.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o� . .0 04.0 + oho 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. )`0---.0 0.0 +.0 0 0. +.0 0.0 +.0 +.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 +` 0.0 0. ° 0.0 o.o o.o o.o +o.o o.o + o o.o o.o o. + o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o. o o.o o. 0.0 0.o o.o o.o +0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 I o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o + o o.o o.o 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 o.o o.o o. o 0 0 0.0 0. o. o.o o.o o.oll z�l LUXURY HOTEL & HOTEL SPA SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 0 25' 50' 100' KEYED NOTES KEY PLAN r -\ PA MC L ��PA2 c \ CC - SS � 1 / AHa l \PA4 �H1 �PA 2 HS G R v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States GLUMAC anglneers for Lsusl,lnable lulu re s10 cle�o ob.e cn T 9169345103 9 P pclM p CM1nst ne CUNar Eob Numb r' r 1216 Po00T A Data Description 5-16-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.18-20% SOP Submittal No.3 Seal l Signature oQQ,OFESS/py� CO ION f�9AFOf CPU7�� Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description LUXURY HOTEL & HOTEL SPA SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN Scale AS SHOWN E1.5 198 @2015 Gensler UI E ILLUMINANCE(FC) AVERAGE _0 .0�+',. .0 0.0 0,.0 0 MAXIMUM=0.5 MINIMUM=0.0 o �.°' oo. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 -0 '0� d 0.0 0.D 07 �0 _0 0. � 6 . � 0.0 0. 0 - - - - 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.- +.0 0. +, .0 0.0 (2)D1 ,,.0 0 C C.0 .0 c. c.: Q .0 0 i2Sb .0 0.0 0.0 0. 0,-4 9,, o. 0 0. 0+. 0 0. 0 �0 y 0.0 0 k,0.0 i0 0 0. 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 +. .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.r fipyY 0.0 0.0 �0.0, Q.0 - 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. .00.00.0+.0+ + 0+0.00.00.00.00.00.00. i 0.0' CO )Dt C L -0_,0. �0 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0.0 0. -O.0 f�.0 u.J 0.0L 0,0 .;.0�0�.0. 0.0 �0.0 +.0 +0.0 +0.0 0.0 0. ,� 0 0 C.:, 0 %-I 0 0.0 0.�0 0 0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0. u., 0.0 0 0.,0 0�0 0.+ ).0� 0 . 0.6 0.f' 0 0:6 0 _ �� e 0 0 1 d- 0.0 .0 0 0.n �.0 0._C C0.0 0.0 +0."` o �0 6.0 0.0 0.0 o�oi a 0 0.0 0. '0-0u. 0.0 .o +0.0 0. o.o o.o o. o 0 0.0 0. 5 0.0 0.0 0. + 0. 0.0 0. 0.0 , 0 GUESTROOMS SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1 SCALE: 1 "=50' 0 25' 50' 100' KEYED NOTES KEY PLAN r -\ PA MC L PA C \ cc SS � 1 / AH �a�l \PA4 ,*<H1 �PA 2 H S Asia as G R v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States GLUMAC ,,gineers for .susin nable lulu,, 911r.1.nnrlme CA9- T.916.934.5103 wvwglumaccom amwnmane9- cnnn n. c.Nar Ennbg nserless giref 12 Number' 12.16 Po00] A Data Description 5-16-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.18-20% SDP Submittal No.3 Seal l Signature oQQ,OFESS/py� 9 � A CO ] ION f�9XFuf CPU1�� Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description GUESTROOMS SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN Scale AS SHOWN E1.6 199 @2015 Gens AREA A 22 1 �1��_ AREA B �%, R1 LUXURY BRANDED q RESIDENTIAL,�� SEE RESIDENTIAL ARCHITCTS DRAWINGS, fv � 0 EXISTING ENTRY ROAD, SNOT PART OF SUBMITAL ��W \ I MC - MEETING CENTER CC - CONFERENCE CENTER \ Q \ SS - SHARED SERVICES BUILDING �,. SILVERROCK WAY AREA C b PA 2 0' 4 i— \ Ifl llnll fill � �. �182 PARKINmG SPAU E u C�) - '_ - PA-2 LUXURY HOTEL O \ A 4 PA-4 CONFEERENCE CENTER q PA J 9� < 7 _ A PA 5 & 10A - FUTU E DEVELOPMENT 8 I < NOT PART 017 SUBMITTAL � I, r e 710 EXISTING AHMANSON RANCH / HOUSE PROPERTY LINE AH - AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE HS - HOTEL SPA / H1 - LUXURY HOTEL PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE GOLF SAFETY LINES AREA D GR- GUESTROOMS GENERAL NOTES BUILDING KEYNOTES AH AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE H1 LUXURY HOTEL GR GUESTROOMS HS HOTEL SPA MC MEETING CENTER CC CONFERENCE CENTER SS SHARED SERVICE BUILDING Ri LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN LEGEND r_ r• PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE GOLF SAFETY LINES - - - EXISTING AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PER LA QUINT, MUNICIPAL CODE — — — — — — — — — — LANDSCAPE SETBACK PER LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE - — - — - — BUILDING SETBACK PER SILVERROCK RESORT SPECIFIC PL t•00000006000000W ACCESSIBLE PATH KEY PLAN — _ VIC AS �PA 2� SS CC cc l AHoJ� H1 HS ,PA2000� o °oo� o�oa 0 GIR Oe I SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States zL Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 5E0 ARCy C 2 830 �q �Fiv 913C\^^�� P OF CAoll Seel l Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN Scale As indicated 0 38 75 150 300 A -1.0 200 5 Gensler 00 I � % I; 2 6 2825 I'IA R4p —REFER TO DKA FOR ROAD DIME I tj V t - 10GUE PARKING \/ \ t \ \ 21 \ 2 \ r \\\ 7 e \ a wv �� PA 3 \ LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL, `, \ \ \ \ \ \ SEE RESIDENTIAL 6 ARCHITCTS DRAWINGS 5 14 k \ \ \\ \`\ 4GUE T \ \ LAKE �\ , PARK] ES 12 \ Al� 'Ili /, GENERAL NOTES BUILDING KEYNOTES O AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE Hi LUXURY HOTEL OR GUESTROOMS HS HOTELSPA MC MEETING CENTER CC CONFERENCE CENTER O SHARED SERVICE BUILDING Ri LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN LEGEND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE GOLF SAFETY LINES EXISTING AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PER LA QUINT, MUNICIPAL CODE — — — — — — — — — — LANDSCAPE SETBACK PER LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE • — • — • — BUILDING SETBACK PER SILVERROCK RESORT SPECIFIC PL �00000000000000• ACCESSIBLE PATH KEY PLAN r — � V A \ — _ MC A S \ \PA 1 2� \ PA 4 > 1 � V\SS ` \ cc AHoJI H1 HIS i❑PA2 O �po� p�oa GR I SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 2256roadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - AREA A Scale 0 15 30 60 120 A -1.1 201 ©2015 Gensler PA 3 R1 - LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL, SEE RESIDENTIAL ARCHITCTS DRAWINGS AH - AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE H1 - LUXURY HOTEL GOLF SAFETY LINES CC - CONFERENCE CENTER- MC - MEETING CENTER' PA 4 PA 2 GENERAL NOTES BUILDING KEYNOTES O AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE Hi LUXURY HOTEL OR GUESTROOMS HS HOTELSPA MC MEETING CENTER CC CONFERENCE CENTER O SHARED SERVICE BUILDING Ri LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN LEGEND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE GOLF SAFETY LINES EXISTING AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PER LA QUINT, MUNICIPAL CODE — — — — — — — — — — LANDSCAPE SETBACK PER LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE • — • — • — BUILDING SETBACK PER SILVERROCK RESORT SPECIFIC PL �00000000000000• ACCESSIBLE PATH KEY PLAN /- — _ MC AS l \PA 2 1 PA 4 > 1 � �l ASS CC AHDJI H1 LJ� HSPA2 li p Opo� p�oa GR I V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 2256roadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 5�o ARcy K N,. C 2 830 sT H'P,y 9 9TF OP CAl�fO Seal / Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - AREA B Scale 0 15 30 60 120 A- 1 .2 202 D 2015 Gensler I X) -PA 2 - PA 4 -- �� MC - MEETING CENTER - CC - CONFERENCE CENTER SS -SHARED SERVICES BUILDING i �1 \ i � h PART OF SUBMITT R1 - LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL, SEE RESIDENTIAL\ ARCHITCTS DRAWINGS - AH -AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE H1 - LUXURY HOTEL - GOLF SAFETY LINES GENERAL NOTES BUILDING KEYNOTES O AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE Hi LUXURY HOTEL OR GUESTROOMS HS HOTELSPA MC MEETING CENTER CC CONFERENCE CENTER O SHARED SERVICE BUILDING Ri LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN LEGEND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE GOLF SAFETY LINES EXISTING AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PER LA QUINT, MUNICIPAL CODE — — — — — — — — — — LANDSCAPE SETBACK PER LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE - — - — - — BUILDING SETBACK PER SILVERROCK RESORT SPECIFIC PL �00000000000000• ACCESSIBLE PATH KEY PLAN r — � I- — _ MC A S _,PA 2� 4 1 PA 4 > SS J \ CC AHBJI H1 HS/ i❑PA2 O �po� p�oa GR I SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 D RCK ti /Tt0 C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN 911113°�^?P 9TF OF CAl�fO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - AREA C Scale 0 15 30 60 120 A -1.3 203 ©2015 Gensler 100 % VALET PARKING. ADA ' PARKING TO BE HANDLED BY VALET ATTENDANT AT DROP - HS - HOTEL SPA AH - AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE H1 - LUXURY HOTEL PA 2 GR- HOTELGUESTROOMS GOLF SAFETY LINES SERVICE YARD TRASH ENCLOSURE FIRE LANE GENERAL NOTES BUILDING KEYNOTES AH AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE H1 LUXURY HOTEL GR GUESTROOMS HS HOTEL SPA MC MEETING CENTER CC CONFERENCE CENTER SS SHARED SERVICE BUILDING R1 LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN LEGEND r_ r• PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE GOLF SAFETY LINES EXISTING AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PER LA QUINT, MUNICIPAL CODE — — LANDSCAPE SETBACK PER LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE - — - — - — BUILDING SETBACK PER SILVERROCK RESORT SPECIFIC PL t•00000006000000W ACCESSIBLE PATH KEY PLAN r- — _ MC A S �PA 2� 1 PA 4 > SS �� l � cc AH �.�o�� H1 HS DPA2000� O °oo� o�oa O GR Oe I SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States zL Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 5E0 ARCy C 2 830 913,L11 P OF CA 1F0 lSeal l Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN -AREA D Scale I 0 15 30 66 120 A -1.4 204 2E LAIC 2015 Gensler GENERAL NOTES BUILDING KEYNOTES AH AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE Hi LUXURY HOTEL GR GUESTROOMS HS HOTEL SPA MC MEETING CENTER CC CONFERENCE CENTER SS SHARED SERVICE BUILDING Ri LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN LEGEND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE GOLF SAFETY LINES EXISTING AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PER LA QUINT, MUNICIPAL CODE — — — — — — — — — — LANDSCAPE SETBACK PER LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE • — • — • — BUILDING SETBACK PER SILVERROCK RESORT SPECIFIC PL �00000000000000• ACCESSIBLE PATH KEY PLAN r — � I- — _ me A S \\,PA 2� 4 1 PA 4 > � ss l cc AH �.�DH1 HS / 5❑ PA 2O �p0` GR�4000 C I I v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 FaX 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 D K /N c' C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN s j30�� ?P 9TF OP CAL�kO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - AREA E Scala 0 15 30 60 120 A -1.5 205 ©2015 Gensler w u LUXURY HOTEL ARIVAL VIEW v LUXURY HOTEL WATER FEATURE ,�%4AEL GENERAL NOTES KEY PLAN r — � \IP /- — _ MC A S \PA 2' 1 PA 4 > 1 � SS CC AHo��r��'v/v H 1 HS—PAZ li p Opo� �ooa GR I SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 ftadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 DAR K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN ei3��^�?P 9TF DF CAI�fG I Sol/ Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Numbef 55.7598.000 Description BUILDING RENDERINGS A - 2.0 206 ©2015 G—n , SPA ARIVAL VIEW vF u LUXURY HOTEL POOL DECK it GENERAL NOTES KEY PLAN r — � I- — _ Mc A S \PA 2' 1 PA 4 > 1 � SS �I cc AH- �oJl H1 PA 2 o O pOoo pooa GR I V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 ftadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 DAR K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN ei3��^�?P 9TF DF CAI�fG Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Numbaf 55.7598.000 Description BUILDING RENDERINGS Scala A-2.1 207 ©2015 Gensler CONFERENCE CENTER ARRIVAL CONFERENCE CENTER GENERAL NOTES KEY PLAN r — --\\ L� \ \PA 3 f — —\— — MC \ l \PA 2 PA 4 > 1 � CC AHoJI H1 HS/ i❑PA2 O Opo� p�oa GR I V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 ftadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description 05.15.201: SDP SUBMITTALN01 09-19-2016 SDPSUBMITTALNO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL N0 3 DAR K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN ei3��^�?P 9TF OF CAI�fG Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Numbaf 55.7598.000 Description BUILDING RENDERINGS Scala A - 2.2 208 ©2015 Gensler SPA ARIVAL VIEW LUXURY HOTEL POOL DECK GENERAL NOTES KEY PLAN r — � L \ \ — _ _ MC \ \PA 2� 1 PA 4 > 1 V\SS cc AHoJI H1 HS/ i❑PA2 O Opo� p�oa GR SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 ftadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description 05.15.201: SDP SUBMITTALN01 09-19-2016 SDPSUBMITTALNO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL N0 3 D AR K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN ei3��^�?P 9TF OF CAI�fG Seal / Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Numbef 55.7598.000 Description BUILDING RENDERINGS A - 2.3 209 '015 Gensler SEE EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHEETS FOR PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURE IMAGES GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 1 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLOR 1 4B METAL FASCIA - COLOR 1 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL TRELLIS - COLOR 1 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 5C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL, BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERA/ 50 INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS 5F GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL 6A SITE WALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE I TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE I TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA THERMOPLASTIC POLYOLEFIN (TPO) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A. BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN r — � I- — _ MC A S \PA 2� 1 PA 4 > 1 � SS CC AHoJI H1 n 2 HS/ i❑PA2 O Opo� p�oa GR I SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 AR YU��y.ED K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PEN 91111 9TF OF CAI�fO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Nu.lbw 55.7598.000 Description MATERIALS BOARD Scale 0 25 50 100 200 A - 3.0 210 ©2015 Gensler UPPER ROOF h LOWE 11' 6" _ LEVEL 0" LEVEL01 31'-0" ABOVESEA LEVEL 4 H1 - NORTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = l'-0' _UPPERR 0 LOWER11' 6" LE$ 0' LEVEL01 31'-0" ABOVESEA LEVEL 3 H1 -WEST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = l'-0' UPPER ROOOF LOWER1�1 6" V LEVEL 01 h o' V LEVEL01 31'-0" ABOVE SEA LEVEL 2 H1 - SOUTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = l'-0' UPPER1RgOOpF h LOWER ROOF h\P n'-s• LEVEL 01 h 0" LEVEL01 31'-0" ABOVESEA LEVEL H1 - EAST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1116" = l'-0" GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ _ MC A S \P1 A 2� PA 4 > 1 � SS CC AHOJI H1 HS/ T❑PA2 O �po� p�oa GR V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 AR KU��y.ED K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN 9I3°�^?P 9TF OP CAI�fO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Numbef 55.7598.000 Description HOTEL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS S.I. 0 4 8 16 32 H1 - A-1.011 © 2015 Gensler _POOL BAR ROOF h 0-6• _ LEVEL 01 h_ 0" 4 H1 - HOTEL POOL BAR -NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 118"=T-0' POOL BAR R $ 11' 0" V am 3 H1 - HOTEL POOL BAR -EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = P-0" DOL BAR ROOF h 0" LEVEL 01 2 H1 - HOTEL POOL BAR -SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0' )L BAR R0 1' - 0" LEVEL 01 $ o" V H1 - HOTEL POOL BAR -WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" V-0" GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 5C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL 6A SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING 8A POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN r � I- — _ MC A S \PA 2� 4 4 1 PA > 1 � 1 V\SS l�cc AHOJI H1 n HS/ 1'❑PA2 O Opo� p�C>a 000�0�� I GR\� V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fac 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16.2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL N0 3 Seal / Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description HOTEL POOL BAR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS I Scale 0 4 8 16 32 H1-A-1.212 ©2015 Gensler T.O. PARAPET EL.18'-6"— ----- ------- HOTEL GUESTROOM, - II SEE GUESTROOM DRAWINGS - HOTEL PORTE-COCHERE 1 EL. 16'-0" 8A E] TERRACE 233 - 7 314" T.O. PARAPET EL. 18' - 6'r 8A OF OF WALL EL. V- �\ 2 4e _ r � GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN AND/OR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L \ _ MC A S \PA 2� 1 PA 4 > V\SS }` \ cc AHOJI H1 HS/ T❑PA2 O �po� p�oa GR V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description 05.15"2015 SDPSUBMITAN01 0-9-20DPSUMTTAL No 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 KU��y.ED K RCti/T� C 2 830 A sT 'PFN 911113°�^?P 9TF OF CAl�fO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Numbef 55.7598.000 Description HOTEL OVERALL ROOF PLAN Scala 0 4 8 16 32 H1 - A-2.0 13 ©2015 Gensler 8" — — — ----------------� Hi-A-1.0 — 1 ,' • HOUSEKEEPI i3 \ \ Jf - OFFICES ME302 SF CHANICAL L---1 _.— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - HOTEL OMEN PORTE-COCHERE SO 1;7 SF ffEWENE.NVALETBOH-MEN 80 SF 180 SF LINEN- SERL CE 8`13" R UDIN YARD HO \ O SOH CORR. WALL80 LIDING GATE B'-0' FRONT 1114 SF SOILED _ r 177 SF n 239 SF _ _ 1 � -- STORAGE HOUSEKEEPIN \ r — — — — BAR 142 SF STORAGE �\ PANTRY EXECUTIVE t80 SF 1185E 0783 SFS FRONT EMPLOYEE HOTEL DESK BREAKROOM SERVICE YARD LOBBY BAR 120 SF 295 SF (OPEN TO ABOVE) 1142 SF WOMEN MEN LOBBY/ 422 SF 422 SF FIRE COMMAND/ WATER FEATURE, LOUNGE RETAIL RETAILS SECURITY SEE W APE 3550 SF CONCIERGE 300 SF 300 SF 170 SF 107 SF EXTERITRASHOR S ORAGE BAG EXTERIOR // CONCIERGE 124 SF 2 /��Hi-A-1.0 , L , — — — STORAGE 747 SF RECYCLE / � 138 SF 747 SF STORAGE 118 SF I I CAN SASH I I L--— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- RETAIL BAR KITCHEN l � i 508 SF 340 SF 1951 SF ROOM 1 SERVICE AREA 421 SF / / \ 3-MEAL 1351 SF TERRACE, ' X PRIVATE NING KID'S CLUB - SEELANDSCAPE ., 564SF 44 SF - DRAWINGS DINING TERRACE " L - STAIRS --------- HOTEL SPA ENTRY, SEE HOTEL SPA DRAWINGS / / 'POOL - / FENCE & GATE HOT GII STROOM, SE GUEST DOM DRAWN S DN i A SPA HOTEL(I\ 31 S POOL DECK, 153 SF \ - Hi-A-1.0__ \ \ SEE GUESTROOM DRA INGS �✓ 7�7 5'-0" POOL FENCE & GATE POOL DECK, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS POOL 5625 SF 12 — —TOWEL STAND 150 SF WOMEN 325 SF SERVICE YARD WALL 8'-0" 2 Hi -A POOL EQUIPMENT 685 SF 1 77 MEN 325 SF SERVICE YARD OPEN TO ABOVE) POOL BA 690 SF R POOL BAR & GRILL KITCHEN 690 SF DINING 5'-0" POOL TERRACE FNCE & GATE ------------ 1J Hi - A-1.2 GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TEXTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN AND/OR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L \ MC A S \PA 2) 1_ PA 4 > 1 � SS CC AHOJI H1 ��/�9 LJO HS/ ❑PA2 O �po� p�oa GR V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619 557 2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description I "15.201: SDPSUBMITAN01 0-9-20DPUMTTALNO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 5�0 ARcy K NF%L/TF C 2 830 1 sT 'PEN 913°�^?P 9TF OF CALxl 0 Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description HOTEL OVERALL FLOOR PLAN Scala 0 4 8 16 32 H 1 - A-3.0 14 © 2015 Gensler UPPER ROOF -4" LOWER ROOF 10' 2' �I .I Iym'L FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY 4 NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING (SEE SCALE: 1/8" =1'-T CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) 3 WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = V.0" 2 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = l'-0" UPPER ROOF 4°y LOWER 1a-2" LEVEL 01 FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) UPPE 4„ LOWER 0?4 .22" LEVELO 0'-0" FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) UPPER 4 z-4„ LOWER ROOF $ 10'-2" I � I � I LEVEL D1 h FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE SOUTH ELEVATION CONCEPT GRADING GRADING .PLANS) SCALE: 1/8" =1'-T GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ _ MC A S \PA 2� 4 1 PA 4 > SS CC AHoJI H1 _ HS/ DPA20000` GR` O I v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fac 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 5�0 ARcy K N,. C 2 830 1 9TF OF CAI�fO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description GR 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Scale 118" =1'-0" 0 4 8 16 32 GR1 -A-1;0 ©2015 Gensler 12'-4" 4 Ems' 49-0114' V \ — ------ —________________ I I I � EXTERIOR WALL BELOW f I / o 8A P E�T 8A BW � I I I i h 1 -- r------------------ I , 1 m i " I I i I r I I + - y Pery T � 'D O BEF W i 1 II i + t I i I i 4E I 1 2 ROOF PLAN FLOOR PLAN -0 4 1n' 11- A' T, 2 R1-A-1. GENERAL NOTES SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT 1 CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI COMPANY, LLC 1B 3COATCEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 2 TEXTURED WALL 92253 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS Gensler 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 3c WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 Diego, CA 92101 OSan 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR United States 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIORTRELLIS- COLORI Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO3 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERATIO 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING SDK ICh'/), �C15 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 �t C 2 830 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 sT 'PFN 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 91111 �?P 9TF OF CAi-iyo 8 ROOFING SeallSignature BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE NOT FOR 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN r Project Name L SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES MC `A�\ i - Project Number �PA2 > 55.7598.000 ��PA4 \^!,/ Description ss GR 1 FLOORPLAN & ROOFPLAN CC AHoJI H1 HS Scale PA20000 O �poo p�oa 1/8"=1.0.1 , �O O� GR ° I G R 1- A-2.0 v 216 © 2015 Gensler 1Z-a" 25'-6' 4 i i I I i O R2-A-1. 1 6 ROOF PLAN R2-A-1. 1 m EXTERI — WALL B I ! OPEN EL. 10' 2" ,n BELOW eA Ir -- I r )a{ OPEN 14 BA BELOW 1 1. 4E m 3 R2-A-1, 4 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: Ile" = V-0' 2 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1I8' =1'.0' — UPPE 4" LOWER ROOF h LE� FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) — UPPER OF LOWERROOF� m'-r LEVE 0'-01. FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) UPPE 4 LOWER n0 10' 2" FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) — UP - 4„ LOWER 0?' O J I I I I I I I I I I I 2 ! I, J _ LEVEL 0p10L FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING FLOOR PLAN WEST ELEVATION (SEE CONCEPT 5 GRADING SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/8" =1'-O" PLANS) GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TEXTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN AND/OR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 8C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ _ MC A S \PA 2� 1 4 PA 4 > 1 � SS CC AHoJI H1 �n HS/ i❑PA20000` O0p0�\��p��a GR`/�' �i�000� Lt I O I v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 5 K RCti/T� C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN 91111 9TF OF CAI�fO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description GR 2 PLANS & ELEVATIONS Scale 1I8" = 1'-0" GR2-A-1.0 217 ©2015 Gensler 25' 6" 21' 8• I 4E --------------------- I 1 EL. 17-2' EXTERIOR WALL BELOW + - EL. 101-2' Y / - 3 EL. T 6" I f 4 I i 6 ROOF PLAN 5 FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0" — UP PER ROOF gL 4• LOWER ROOF h 1a-2• � I LEVEL 01h a -a FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) 4 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8' = V-0" UPP 4, LOWER ROOF h 0' 2" LEVEL 01 $ a-0" FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) 3 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" R3-A-1. UP i — — — J= — k— — — — _�� 4 - LOWERROOF� 10' - 2' V 23'-n" in' - It• d' -T 349 2 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 118" =1'-0" WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" =1' 0" LEVE 0'-0" FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) 2'-y. uPP� LOWERROOF 10'-2" LEVEL W a -a FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) GENERAL NOTES SILVERROCK 1 CEMENT PLASTER DEVELOPMENT 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI COMPANY, LLC 1B 3COATCEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 2 TEXTURED WALL 92253 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS Gensler 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 3c WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 Diego, CA 92101 OSan 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR United States 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4c METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIORTRELLIS- COLORI Date Description 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO3 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERATIO 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL AR 7 PAVING I FLOORING �C15 SK N, h. , D V � 2� t� 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR I 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 C 2 830 sT 'PFN s I3°�^ 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 �?P 9TF Op OpL�pO 8 ROOFING SeallSignature BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE NOT FOR 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN r Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & L RESIDENCES Project Number MC A�` i�/-55.7598.000 2 PA4 Description �!�,� ss GR 3 PLANS &ELEVATIONS CC AHoJI H1 HS Scale PA 20000 1/8„ =1, p„ �O O� GR°I GR3-A-1.0 v 218 © 2015 Gensler m 4 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" 3 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 118"- VT 2 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0' WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = V-0' 13BF9 UPPE�4" _ LOWER 0'-4„ L Y FINISH FUR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) IPPER ROOF 4' JWER R 0' 4' EVEL 01 h 0' - 00' FINISH FUR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) UP 4. LOWER ROOF h 10'-4-4' LEVEL 01 0'-P V FINISH FUR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) UPPE 4" LOW ERROOFh 10' - 44" LEVE 0' 0" FINISH FUR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN AND/OR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ I- — _ MC A S \PA 2� 1 PA 4 > 1 � SS CC AHoJI H1 n HS/ DPA20000` GR` O I v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 AR KU��y.ED K N, ti. C 2 830 1 'lop 9TF OF CAI�fO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Numbef 55.7598.000 Description GR - 4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Scale 1I8" = 1'-0" GR4-A-1.0 219 ©2015 Gensler 0111111ilpm, 25'-6" 1 21'-8" 2 ROOF PLAN n EXTERIOR WALL BELOW 3 R4-A-1. R4-A-1. 1 FLOORPLAN -0 2 3 R4-A-1. GENERAL NOTES SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI COMPANY, LLC 1B 3COATCEMENT PILASTER - COLOR 2 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 2 TEXTURED WALL 92253 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS Gensler 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 3c WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 Diego, CA 92101 OSan 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR United States 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA-COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIORTRELLIS- COLORI Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL No 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO3 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERATIO 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL RCh'/), 7 PAVING I FLOORING SDK �C15 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 �t C 2 830 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 sT 'PFN 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 s I3°�^ �?P 9TF OF CpL�pO 8 ROOFING SeallSignature BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE NOT FOR 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN Project Name r SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number MC `A�` i�/-55.7598.000 2 PA4 > \^!,/ Description ss GR4 FLOORPLAN & ROOFPLAN CC AHoJI H1 HS Scale D PA 20000 1/8" = 11_0.1 O OOoo p�oa �O O� GR71z° I G R 4- A-2.0 v 220 © 2015 Gensler JI) LEVEL 03 LEVEL02 11'-6' LE 0' LEVEL01 30'-0" ABOVESEA LEVEL 4 HS - NORTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = V-0' L 5'-3" LEVEL 02 h 11' - 6" LEVEL 0" LEVEL01 30'-0" ABOVE SEA LEVEL 3 HS - EAST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = V-W LEVEL03 LEVEL 02 11' 6' LEVEL L 0' LEVEL01 30'{I" ABOVE SEA LEVEL 2 HS - SOUTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1116" = l'-0" EVELV� 3" LEVEL 6 h 1' 2,$ LEVEL 01 �\ 0' LEVEL01 30'-0" ABOVE SEA LEVEL 1 HS - WEST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" f-0' GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ _ MC A S \P1 A 2� PA 4 > 1 � SS CC AH- H1 HS—'❑�PA2 li p Opo� p�oa GRY�' V SILVER ROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 5�0 ARcy K N,. C 2 830 1 9TF OF CAI�fO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVER ROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Numbaf 55.7598.000 Description HOTEL SPA EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Scala 0 4 8 16 32 HS - A-1.021 © 2015 Gensler ,GOLF SAFETY SETBACK LINE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE Nl` 3 TOP OF WALL EL. 5' - 0" ,r E WOMEN'S TOP.OF WALL EL. B'-0° l GARDEN — - TOP OF WALL E-E, -6' -- — _ SPA 2 S-A-1. ENTRY _1 I L. I � I � I I \ 1�0 GENERAL NOTES SILVER ROCK CEMENT PLASTER DEVELOPMENT 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER — COLORI COMPANY, LLC 1B 3COATCEMENT PLASTER — COLOR 2 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 2 TE)c LURED WALL 92253 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS Gensler 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 3c WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR United States 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN AND/OR TRELLIS - COLORI Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO3 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERATIO 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITE WALL AR 7 PAVING I FLOORING SK N, h. , D �C15 V � 2� t� 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 ` �t C 2 830 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 'f q 't sT 'PFN 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 s I3°N^ �?P 9TF Op CpL�pO 8 ROOFING Sol/ Signature BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE NOT FOR 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN Project Name r L SILVER ROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES VIC i — Project Number `A�` 2 PA 4 > 55.7598.000 vPA \^!, �� Description ss HOTEL SPA OVERALL ROOF PLAP f CC AH,o- H 1 - �2O Scale HS ❑�PA 2 � li Opo� �ooa 1/16" = V-0" p �Oo 0 48 16 32 GR�000p H S A-2 O I . 222 © 2015 Gensler JI) 183' 7" GOLF SAFETY SETBACK LINE - PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE POOL FENCE 5'-0" 324' - 9112" 70' T. 70'-11112" O AHMANSON PROPERTY RANCH \ PROPERTY LINE I 3 ((�<.0, � 210 SF ---------- I ICIEIWINEJ MECH.I BAR POOLED. 1 213 SF 320 SF 41 STAIRS \ I MEWS lfl��DN I /\ GARDEN POOL FENCE F-O" MEN'S \ HS-A-1.0 4 HOTELSPA POOLDECK ts TREATMENT ROOM 116 SF LOCKER ROOM \� r III /A 1680SF�'/�%% \/ _ � SALON I /\ 850 SF RAMP=-- \\ ADJA \LUXUR OTEL� \ \ \ 1 i II I LOBBY LOUNGE 414 SF ON ---------------- - CO-ED WATER FEATURE EXTERIOR TERRACE LOUNGE 41 CORR. CORR. SHAENTRY 2 HS-A-1.0 590 SF 1434 SF 853 SF RAMP UP /\ / \ WOMEN'S GARDEN / ` ` 05 SF STUDIO ROOM 500 SF FITNESS CENTER 1124 SF / li /\ LOCKER ROOM Y L--------_—,; / \ 1680 SF \ / I I POOL FENCE 50 r— —------- --- OR— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — r — — \- CORR. 41. i ----------------- 1— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — BON — 532 SF I TREATMENT / ROOM 201 SF I 1 I _ a I I \J ---- ----- ----.._—J L— ----- —J HYDRO 3C TREATMENT TREATMENT TREATMENT ',ROOM ROOM 141 SF', 1165E 113ROOMSF TREATMENT ROOM 141 SF MM �"A GENERAL NOTES SILVER ROCK CEMENT PLASTER DEVELOPMENT 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI COMPANY, LLC 1B 3COATCEMENT PLASTER- COLOR 2 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 2 TEXTURED WALL 92253 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS Gensler 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 3c WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE Suite 1600 Fa 619.557.2520 Diego, CA 92101 OSan 3O PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR United States 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA -COLORS 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIORTRELLIS- COLORI Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN COLOR 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO3 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERATIO 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL R,h'/), 7 PAVING I FLOORING SDK �C15 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR I C 2 830 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE I TILE PAVING- COLORS 9TF OF CAL\yo 8 ROOFING SeallSignature BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE NOT FOR 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN r Prolect Name \ SILVER ROCK RESORT & \ \ \ RESIDENCES \ \ MC `A�\ i - Project Number �PA2 > 55.7598.000 ��PA4 ^ Description ss HOTEL SPA OVERALL FLOOR PLAN CC AH,-o-J—��p/ H 1 S.I. HS ❑�PA 2 00� li p Opo� �ooa 1/16" = V-0" �o �� 0 4 8 16 32 GR°�°-"� ; H S - A-3.0 223 © 2015 Gensler d � U V U U MEETING CENTER BUILDING 1 - ` T.O.PARAPET _ — 1 EL. 15'-6' - . T.O.PARAPET - 1 �� T.O. PA BE EL. 15'-6' - ` - EL. 16 - 6' gq 111" TO. PARAPET rI V EL28'-0" J BA I 8A I8p L e EL. 13'-6" + I 1 I E� EL T.O:fARAP T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET E EL. 15'- EL. 16-6' EL. 28'-0" .. —___ ... T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET eq EL.16'-6" EL. T.O. PARAPET 8A EL. 23'-0" EL� EL. 20' 0" T.O. PARAPET EL. 16' - 6".� I CONFERENCE CENTER BUILDING 4E EL. 11'-6" U SHARED SERVICES BUILDING I EL. 18'-0' EL18'- I � 8A BA TOP OF WALL EL. 16' -6- EL. OPEN T MECFiANI t r V BELQ T.O. PARAPET EL. 18'-0" T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET EL. 23' - 0" T.O. PARA EL. 23'-0' EL. 1P.6" GENERAL NOTES SILVERROCK CEMENT PLASTER DEVELOPMENT 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI COMPANY, LLC 1B 3C0ATCEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 2 TE)c LURED WALL 92253 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS Gensler 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 3c WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR United States 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4c METAL FASCIA- COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA- COLOR3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 5C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERATIO 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITE WALL AR 7 PAVING I FLOORING SK N, h. , D �C15 V � 2� t� 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 �t C 2 830 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 'f q 't sT 'PFN 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 91111 �?P 9TF OF CpL�pO 8 ROOFING SeallSignature BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE NOT FOR 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN r Project Name L SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES _Mc Project Number PA4/ \` PA 2i�rl 55.7598.000 Description �1 SS OVERALL CONFERENCE cc CENTER/SHARED SERVICES AH____ ' H 1 BUILDING ROOF PLAN -gyp/ �2 Scale \o � 1s 39 sc O GRvv�o OCC - A- 1 1.0 224 ©2015 Gensler GENERAL NOTES SILVERROCK CEMENT PLASTER DEVELOPMENT 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI COMPANY, LLC 1B 3COATCEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 2 TE)CTURED WALL 92253 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS Gensler 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 3c WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 Diego, CA 92101 OSan 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR United States 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIORTRELLIS- COLORI Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERATIO 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL RCh'/), 7 PAVING I FLOORING SDK �C15 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 �t C 2 830 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 9TF OF CpL�pO 8 ROOFING SeallSignature BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE NOT FOR 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN r Prolect Name L SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number i - Mc 55.7598.000 �IPA2 > ��PA4 \ tt1l��jj Description ss OVERALL CONFERENCE CC CENTER/SHARED SERVICES AH �.fioJ\ H 1 BUILDING PLAN -gyp/ �2 HS-PA Scale 2 � OOoo pooa 1"=30'-0" O \o p pow �Q O O 0 6 15 30 oC GR I OCC A-2.0 C I 225 T © 2015 Gensler MC ROOF V 13'-6" LEVEL 0"$ LEVEL 01 29,V ABOVE SEA LEVEL 4 MC - NORTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1116" =1'-0" MC ROOF 13'-6" _ LEVEL 0" LEVEL 01 29' 0" ABOVE SEA LEVEL 3 MC - EAST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1116" = V-9' U" Y LEVEL01 29'-0" ABOVE SEA LEVEL 2 MC - SOUTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" =1'-0" MC ROOF h 13-6" LEVEL 01 h 9" V LEVEL 01 29'-0" ABOVE SEA LEVEL MC - WEST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16' =1'-0" GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN � — _ Mc A S \ \PA 2� \ ' PA 4 > v SS cc AHoJI H1 2 HS DPA2 O Opo� p�oa GR I SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 KU��y.ED RC K ti /T(n C 2 830 1 9TF OF CAI�fO Seal / Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description MEETING CENTER EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Scale 0 4 6 16 32 MC -A-1.06 ©2015 Gensler 1 GENERAL NOTES SILVERROCK CEMENT PLASTER DEVELOPMENT 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER — COLORI COMPANY, LLC 1B 3COATCEMENT PLASTER — COLOR 2 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 2 TE)CTURED WALL 92253 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS Gensler 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3c WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 OSan 3D Diego, CA 92101 United States PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4c METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIORTRELLIS- COLORI Date Description 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERATIO 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL AR 7 PAVING I FLOORING �C15 SK N, h. , D V � 2� t� �t 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING- COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 C 2 830 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 9TF OF CpL�pO 8 ROOFING Seallsignature BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE NOT FOR 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN r Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & L RESIDENCES Project Numb9r Mc FA�\ i - \PA24 PA4 55.7598.000 > 1 I Description ss MEETING CENTER OVERALL ROOF cc PLAN AHH 1 ,-o- �2 HS Scale , PA 2 � 1/16" =1'-0" \� p �� 16 32 �O�o�O GR /��./��"" MC - A-2.0 j 227 ©2015 Gensler 4" 25' 0' /i 3 r------� MEETING R OM02 #3 \ L- - i III i i 3C III EXTERIOR MEETING PRE-FUNCNON ROOM k4 3468 SF 773 SF EXTERIOR BOH CORR. MEETING 1126 SF \ ROOM 1*2 L 000 SF I I I MEETING 2 ROOM#5 C-A-1. oJ 773 SF \ � I I ❑ I WOMEN \ 275SF I I MEETING \ 7 275 SF ROOM 1000 SF ROOM #6 i 1005 SF , VALET BUSINESS-- _ OFFICE CENTER- _ �`---- 150 SF 213 SF --"j -- — — _ EXTERIOR _ ENTRY CORRIDOR 3401,SF --- --� -----------------J i i i I I o I I t i I �O \ _-_ _--_--------------------------------------- BANQUET BANQUET AV STORAGE 5185E 1300 SF BOH CORR. 4586 SF I 8510 SF BALLROOM I 0 I I I LOBBY PRE -FUNCTION 713 SF 5571 SF I I I 0 0 I ` L-------- - - - - - - GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TEXTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 30 PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN _ Mc — ' PA 4 > v SS cc AHoJI H1 2 HS PA O �po� p�oa GR V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United Statee Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 5�o ARcy K N,. C 2 830 1 sT 'PEN e I3 °�^?P 9TF OF r XL _ Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description MEETING CENTER OVERALL FLOOR PLAN Scale 1116" =1'-0" 0 4 6 16 32 MC -A-3.0$ ©2015 Gensler 4 CC - NORTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1116' =1'4' 3 CC - EAST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1116' =1'4' a� 2 CC - SOUTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1116' = V-0" CC - WEST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1116' = V-0" !4e TOP OF PARAPET EL..28' CCCC R 29' - o' LEVEL 01 LEVEL01 29'-0" ABOVE SEA LEVEL U" Y LEVEL01 29'-G' ABOVE SEA LEVEL CC ROOF � LEVEL 0' LEVEL01 29'-0' ABOVE SEA LEVEL CC ROOF 2o'-a" LEVEL o"JI LEVEL 01 29'-o' ABOVE SEA LEVEL GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ —\— _ MC �1 \PA2 )41 PA4 > SS CC AHoJI H1 HS DPA2 O Opo� p�oa GRY�' SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 KU��y.ED RC K ti /T(n C 2 830 1 'lop 9TF OP CAl�fO Seal / Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description CONFERENCE CENTER EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Scale 1116" =1'-0" 0 4 8 16 32 CC - A-1.029 ©2015 Gensler GENERAL NOTES SILVERROCK CEMENT PLASTER DEVELOPMENT 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI COMPANY, LLC 1B 3COATCEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 2 TE)CTURED WALL 92253 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS Gensler 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 3c WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 Diego, CA 92101 OSan 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR United States 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4c METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIORTRELLIS- COLORI Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERATIO 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL AR 7 PAVING I FLOORING SK N, h. , D �C15 V � 2� t� 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 �t C 2 830 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 9TF OF CpL�pO 8 ROOFING SeallSignature BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE NOT FOR 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN r Project Name L SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES MC ` i - Project Number �PA2 > 55.7598.000 \ ��PA4 Description ss CONFERENCE CENTER OVERALL cc ROOF PLAN AHH 1 ,-o- �2 HS— Scale � Opoo pooa O \o �� 0 4 8 16 32 GR //� CC - A-2.0 I 230 JI) ©2015 Gensler MEETING ROOM #4 773 SF MEETING ROOM #5 773 SF WOMEN 275 SF MEN 275 SF MEETING ROOM #6 1005 SF I I I I I/ IN EXTERI B IIIIIIIIIIIIIt 11 2C6 O_ c C-A-14 I I I I milli. 3 BANQUET T I BANQUESTORAGEGEl F 18SF 1300 SF S BANQUET R KITCHEN 3277 SF I LOADING DOCK SOH CORR. 2819 SF 4586 SF I SECURITY 180 SF - - EXTERIOR r BOH CORR. BOH CORR. 1955 SF 1701 SF BALLROOM 85M 0 SF WOMEN MEN 559 SF 559 SF MEETING ROOM #7 220q SF 2, CC-A-1. HUMAN -- RESOURCES ESTIBUL o OFFICE 68 SF rn ... - - 111 SF N BANQUET STORAGE GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TEXTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3O PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ \PA3 f — —\— _ MC �1 \PA2) PAAlia > SS CC AH6Jl H1 n 2 HS/ i❑PA2 O �po� p�oa GR V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 2258roadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 AR KU��y.ED K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN 91111 9TF OF CAL1f0 Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description CONFERENCE CENTER OVERALL FLOOR PLAN Scale 1116" =1'-0" 0 4 6 16 32 CC - A-3.031 ©2015 Gensler -- RESOURCES ESTIBUL o OFFICE 68 SF rn ... - - 111 SF N BANQUET STORAGE GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TEXTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3O PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ \PA3 f — —\— _ MC �1 \PA2) PAAlia > SS CC AH6Jl H1 n 2 HS/ i❑PA2 O �po� p�oa GR V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 2258roadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 AR KU��y.ED K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN 91111 9TF OF CAL1f0 Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description CONFERENCE CENTER OVERALL FLOOR PLAN Scale 1116" =1'-0" 0 4 6 16 32 CC - A-3.031 ©2015 Gensler SS Rn 13'-6' LEVEL01 0' LEVEL 01 29'-0" ABOVE SEA LEVEL 4 SS - NORTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE. 1.116' =1 0 SS ROOF h 6' LEV� 6" LEVEL01 29'-0' ABOVE SEA LEVEL 3 SS - EAST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" =1'-0" BsROO � LEVEL L 0'$ LEVEL01 29' 0" ABOVE SEA LEVEL 2 SS - SOUTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" =1'-0" _ SS R 13'-6' LEVEL 0' LEVEL01 29'-P' ABOVE SEA LEVEL SS - WEST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1116" =10" GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ —\— _ MC �1 \PA2) PA4 > SS CC AHoJI H1 HS PA O Opo� p�oa GRY�' SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 AR KU��y.ED K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN 9I3°�^?P 9TF OF CAI�fO Seal / Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description SHARED SERVICES BUILDING - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS scale 0 4 6 16 32 SS - A-1.0 32 © 2015 Gensler GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ —\— _ MC �1 \PA2) PA4 > SS CC AH- H1 HS DPA2 O �po� p�oa GR � V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 AR KU��y.ED K N, ti. C 2 830 1 9TF OF CAI�fO Seal / Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description SHARED SERVICES BUILDING OVERALL ROOF PLAN Scale 0 4 8 16 32 SS - A-2.0 33 ©2015 Gensler GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ —\— _ MC �1 \PA2) PA4 > SS CC AHoJI H1 2 HS DPA2 O �po� p�oa GR � V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fac 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 AR KU��y.ED K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN s 9TF OF CAI�fO Seal / Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description SHARED SERVICES BUILDING OVERALL FLOOR PLAN Scale 0 4 8 16 32 SS - A-3.0 34 ©2015 Gensler \ R o L�� •,CC/ SETBACKS Back 1 II o , � 1 II �, -7 6 7 -6 Proposed I Property Lined I _I I Proposed I 1 Setback Line I 1 II II LFront I J O p H 0 oo oCU ED = N co00 "X ` a.t Note: L Exceeds setbacks as s, described in the "Specific o�\ Plan", Table 12 PA4 s str civil it diensiodm,ensio for ° n Casitas. i 36.5 / 37.5 7 \ V"v J I I II 9ENERAL NOTES Site Tabulation: Site Area: 599,914.27 S.F. = 13.8 Acres Program Summary (House + Garage): 7 Plan 1 - House & Garage 7 x 4,575 S.F. = 32,025 S.F. 6 Plan 2 - House, Pool Bath & Garage 0 6 x 4,895 S.F. = 29,370 S.F. 4 Plan 2 - House, Pool Bath, Casita #1 & Garage 4 x 5,286 S.F. = 21,144 S.F. 1 Plan 2 - House, Pool Bath, Pool House, Casita #1 & Garage 1x 5,785 S.F. = 5,785 S.F. 1 Plan 3 - House & Garage 0 1 x 5,595 S.F. = 5,595 S.F. 6 Plan 3 - House, Casita #1 & Garage 6 x 5,784 S.F. = 34,704 S.F. 2 Plan 3 - House, Pool House, Casita #1 &Garage 2 x 5,949 S.F. = 11,898 S.F. 2 Plan 4 - House & Garage 2 x 5,528 S.F. = 11,056 S.F. 29 Total Units Total Square Footage = 151,577 S.F. Open Space Area: Site Area: 599,914.27 S.F. = 13.8 Acres Total Building Footprints = 151,577 S.F Driveway Areas 0 = 33,324 S.F. Streets With Parking = 84,867 S.F. Sloped Open Spaces 0 = 46,055 S.F. Total Covered Site Areas = 315,823 S.F. Provided Open Space: Site Area = 599,914 S.F. Covered Site Area = 315,823 S.F. Total Open Space = 284,091 S.F. Total % Open Space 47.4% KEY PLAN SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA z�, Date Description 5.16.2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09.19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/Signature 4F'a1,, a A 09p,,,r�s �°-36313 P 9� °F 0,1At .1E I Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Conceptual Site Plan Scale 0 15, 30' 60' 120' R1-1 PA 3 Copyright ® MARK GROSS &ASSOCIATES, INC. AR rights reserved 235 9GioG - — 1r D 3/.5 2 o1 0R,QO F 1 � 158'-6" — . ,✓ `\, \ - f ��TJ � '� I Back � o , 'I I' Proposed I Property Line I Proposed 1 I Setback Line--) I 1 1 'I I' II II LFront I O O O J H a) H o O o m �= 00 N Note: Exceeds setbacks as described in the "Specific Plan", Table 12 PA4 Casitas. A�� \ Roa \ 1 v w i \ I >247 \ \ seenvi awingsfor„\ I ,i reel di lions � I ze I 20� �I -v 34.5 I I vv I � L 3 .� 33 5 /' i� i W 16 33.0 Site Area: 599,914.27 S.F. = 13.8 Acres Program Summary (House + Garage): 7 Plan 1 - House & Garage 7 x 4,575 S.F. = 32,025 S.F. 6 Plan 2 - House, Pool Bath & Garage 0 6 x 4,895 S.F. = 29,370 S.F. 4 Plan 2 - House, Pool Bath, Casita #1 & Garage 4 x 5,286 S.F. = 21,144 S.F. 1 Plan 2 - House, Pool Bath, Pool House, Casita #1 & Garage 1x 5,785 S.F. = 5,785 S.F. 1 Plan 3 - House & Garage 1 x 5,595 S.F. = 5,595 S.F. 6 Plan 3 - House, Casita #1 & Garage 6 x 5,784 S.F. = 34,704 S.F. 2 Plan 3 - House, Pool House, Casita #1 & Garage 2 x 5,949 S.F. = 11,898 S.F. 2 Plan 4 - House & Garage 0 2 x 5,528 S.F. = 11,056 S.F. 29 Total Units Total Square Footage = 151,577 S.F. Open Space Area: Site Area: 599,914.27 S.F. = 13.8 Acres (`.nvprpri Rife ArpnQ- Total Building Footprints = 151,577 S.F Driveway Areas 0 = 33,324 S.F. Streets With Parking 0 = 84,867 S.F. Sloped Open Spaces 0 = 46,055 S.F. Total Covered Site Areas = 315,823 S.F. Provided Open Space: Site Area = 599,914 S.F. Covered Site Area = 315,823 S.F. Total Open Space = 284,091 S.F. Total % Open Space 47.4% SETBACKS KEY PLAN SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 ® tit.if . t s~ A Data Description 5-16-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09.19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10484016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal ISignature ��9ED MCNrr Y'c•24a1a`4o ^y J) \1 OF GItF Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Conceptual Site Plan Scale 1" =60'-0" 0 15' 30' 60' 120' R1-2 PA 3 Copyright C, MARK GRO58 &ASSOCIATES, INC. All rights reae= 236 Front Elevation Rear Elevation ni= Left Elevation Right Elevation SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, u1 WNYA CA 92253 Date Dexriown 5-1e-201a 2DMbml1W1No.1 9.7.2DI6 PLnebgReA- 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 .ham 2 ms� oF nw% PYujac Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES P,*. NmrBar 55.7598.000 0¢samllcn Plan No.1 Conceptual Eloy0m'A' 9— D 2 d :$ R1 -3 PA 3 Capyrlght A b,%RK GR--R23",7eclA7as. nic. All nghle r... rcrd Front Elevation Rear Elevation Left Elevation Right Elevation SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, ILA WNYA CA 92253 iQ clot. Deurkallon S-19-2 " sw1b S.w-litalm.. 1 9741)19 pw—mg $Z- 09-19-20 6 SDP Submittal No. 2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No. 3 P1uj.c Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES P,*. W.mb.r — 55.7598.OW Plan No. 1 Conceptual EWYWon W S— "6.0 - - - - 6- 0 2 4 a I R14 PA 3 VARX --s23&—Es, r- All nUilbL. P,,-,d I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I wall I 1 I I I I I I I I I I Elevation 'B' Roof Plan ---------------------------------- I I I I I I �Flal Roo° I I I L I I I Flat Roof I Flat Roof I I I I I I Parapet Wall 1 -Flat Roof I Fla[ Roof I I I I I �I -Flat Roof Skylight CMU Wall I Parapet Wall I ______L----------------- I -Flat Roof I -Flat Roof Flat Roof I I I I I I I IL I I I I I I I Elevation 'A' Roof Plan SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 U C'mg_ 0 Date Description 516-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09.19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal 4F'�gE0 R " -24313 Fu' O v OP CAl\F Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Plan No. 1 Conceptual Roof Plans Swle 1/8" =1'-0" 0 2 4 8 16 R1-5 PA 3 Copyright © NARK GROSS &ASSOCIATES, INC. All rights reserved junior Master Option Floor Plan m ® I edro m 2 4•-2. 12'-0 I ® I I I I I 3,936 sq. ft. Theater Option SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 q a a U n U1 _ O � ro Cmg 0 Date Description 516-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 11-132011 SDPSubmiltal No.2 10.18.2016 SDP Submittal No.3 �Q A�N'rF^ 4F'�gE0 "C C-24313 Fu' ,r 9� O 9 � CAL\F Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Plan No. 1 Conceptual Floor Plan S.I. 1/8" =1'-0" 0 2 4 8 16 R1-6 PA 3 Copyright © NARK GROSS &ASSOCIATES, INC. All rights reserved A A Front Elevation Rear Elevation Left Elevation Mir n Right Elevation 5 SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-1 N AHMiANSON LANE, LA QUKFA, CA 91253 Es m � V °m e r D.0 Da..011w 51E-1118 SDP 9NMntwlNo.t 9,74119 Planon0 Pit-11 . 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Stall lS7Dnyum P .A YC i�817'��`lr 74� I'k r DF �,tl Paojecl Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES P.JJ.d N".1aer//�� 55.759B. V�-11��11 VU D—Ip0im Plan Na, 2 Conceptual Elevatlon'X goal. I D 2 m S s RI-7 PA 3 Atli rtghW read Front Elevation Rear Elevation Left Elevation 3Right Elevation e SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-1 T9 AHMANSON LANE. LAQUINTA CA 92253 rn � fulllA V r D] DMr Deacrision 51E-1118 S[IP 9uMntwlNo.t 97.2010 Pl.nun0 Ft-s . 09.19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.18-2016 SDP Submittal No Sad 1 S2Dlulitm P .A 0, CA I Pxnjacl Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES law.j.l. Nlh lber//�� 55.759B. V�-11��11 VU D—lpdon Plan No. 2 Conceptual Elevation W seat. I RI-8 PA 3 c-- fhl o -P.D (1 — 24*C1-- INC. Atli rtghW reu—d ---------------------—-------—---- I I I I I I I 1 I I TT Parapet Wall II I II 1 I II. 1 I I Parapet Wall Built Up Grovel Roof II II LJ I 1 I I 1 I I 1 Elevation '6' Roof Plan ---------------------------------- I I I I I I � iar Hcof I I I I I I Built Up Gravel Roof I Parapet Wall Parapet Wall I I II II II II II II Li I I _ Met Root II I II I II II II J I I I I I I -----------------------------------� Elevation 'A' Roof Plan SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 U A Date Description 5-16-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.1&2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Plan No. 2 Conceptual Roof Plans S.I. 0 2 4 6 16 R1-9 PA 3 Copyright ® MARE GROSS & ASSOCIATES, INC. All rights reserved i4� Pool House Option Casita Option #2 499 sq. ft. - For Lots +160' 499 sq. ft. - For Lots +1 60' Casita Option #1 391 sq. ft. - For Lots + 13 5' 90, ------------------------- Outdoor � Sftowe Pool Bath r , I I I nll I I I Cov ed tdoor sm Dini Sp e %< Ref. 1 ' 0" Ceil IAA� r F L I ° °^ Covered Ou cooMas[ r Suite Kitchen Livin Sac I 1U-0• Ceumg g p za• x 14' m•-0• ceumg m•-0• Cailin ❑ Ir Co.k p l Rd. 00 I I Ovens I oo I I-------- 6.12 1 Wand x Gr at' o'om AbaJB�at n�— — — — — — — — — — — — - r I ❑ M' SI ping g O 1x 24 I � II Down 12' II ------- b--=in --� �r- ' Down Wire Pdr una I Entry 12" Rer. Wne Room , I � Laun. r nD Forecourt FAU 1 I 1 = Bath Roof Abgove L O Golf Cart Space 1 12' x 15' 1 Bed oom 4 ■ rt-- 1s ^x16 1 Floor Plan I ' anity ster Bath r-0" Ceiling I I �Lin.n a i I I slantl A.C. I ® 7.-1 edroo 14' 13' 3 x 10'-0" Ceiling O 'M ® 1 Broom 2 1 "" Ceiling I r I I ;arage zr 10'-0" Celling ' 1 1 1 1 4,223 sq. ft. SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 A a � c ro �mg 0 Data Description 516-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.1&2016 SDP Submittal No.3 �Q A�N'rF^ 4F'�gE0N "C C-24313 Fu' P O 9�9 � CAL\F Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Plan No. 2 Conceptual Floor Plan S.I. 1/8" =1'-01. 6 R1-10 PA 3 Copyright Qo MARK GROSS & ASSOCIATES• INC. All rights reserved �44 Front Elevation f 14. Rear Elevation Left Elevation i Right Elevation SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE. LA []1 JKTA. CA 92253 L. moue DenrlPNon 510-2016 SOP Su0rIlittal NaA ,11,, 47-316 PloanMO NauNw 09.19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 a.., 1sig—l— Prcpml Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Pri.ra7ramba 55.7598.000 o.ral�awa plan No. 3 Conmptaal Elimfiort'N ISow 118' =1'-0* J) 0 d E 1S R1-11 PA 3 Capyn iht gi NARK GROSS Y ASSOCIATES, INC AS rIjbl re -l. Front Elevation w t:. Rear Elevation I I I Left Elevation I I � 00 ❑ I Right Elevation SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE. LAGUINTA CA 92253 o Iri t� "-DAN DwMplloa 6.1E-mo SOP Subm1aw No.1 9-72016 P11"'w41;w1#w 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18.2016 SDP Submittal No.3 $.nlf BiOn�lur� f �CQi313 �'�`A i � CR4IF Pfa I Now SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Prepee! Nwih.r 557598.000 D...ipll. Plan No. 8 Conceptual BmUm T Scale 116" = t'•D" R1-1 2 PA 3 246 ' <•s • Wh- NARK GROSS & tiTCfATEn, INC. .All xA&U rea —d ---------------------------------- I I I I I I —Flat Roof I I PamPet Well I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -Flat Roof I I I I I I I I I I I I Y II 1 I I I I I I I I I I PamPet Wall I I I I I Built -Up Gravel Roofer I I ~11 To Porch Below I Flat Roof I I Built -Up Gravel 1 I I I I I —Flat Roof II I I II II Flat Roof Ropf� I I I I I I I Parapet Wall I I I I I I I I Elevation '6' Roof Plan ---------------------------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I —Flat Roof I I I I I Parapet Wall I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •—.Flat Rol I I I I I I —Flat Roof I I I I I I I I I ~on To Po ch Below I I Parapet Wall I Flat Roof I I I I I I Built -Up Gravel Rooter I I I o I I I I I I I I I -----------------------------------J Elevation 'A' Roof Plan SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 U A Date Description 5-16-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.1162016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal 4F'asEON Ap�PST�.. " -24313 d' OP CAUCF Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Plan No. 3 Conceptual Roof Plans Scale 0 2 4 & 15 R1-13 PA 3 Copyright © MARK GROSS & ASSOCrIA�TES, INC. All rights reserved /47 Casitas Option #2 451 sq. ft. At Lots 165'-0" + Deep Only uwuu�u Ills V Tankl 0 Loren B droom 3 oir 1-o• x 1r " 3 i I I O Casitas 16'-0" x 14'-0• I � ❑ I I I I I Casitas Option #1 Additional 189 sq. ft. n] ------------------- I I Pool House Ago a" Sink Ref. , IN r------------------- ---1 I I I I I I I I I I I � I I I I .. Maste Suite Pool House Option 454 sq. ft. At Lots 165'-0" + Deep Only = r INCHII 0 0 y - Bedroom & Ba. 6 Option I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I F I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O I r I I I I I I I I M MW11 Lounge 17'6 -" x 19'-0" rs-0^a�a Island ! Ref. Covered Outdoor Living Space 27-6' x 16'-0" <IOvens Gnll � Pantry D Kitchen Cooktop Sink Ref. > /I R I Room in om 9 s•-o• x z 6'• I I I I z•-G•ceii g O ly}� at oo 8" n 18'-3" Scre /i 0' C fling Abov 9 I I � ❑� I I I I � - 0 ® Entry i I 2 .2 3 Office / Opt. Bedroom 5 16-0'x.14•-0" Suite I I avatar water '-�91ft• IT�ific ��edrdom$ hBa. � I I I I I I l L J I I I 90, Floor Plan Master Bath HEON JIM wide 4msll� irQl Irm:d x ' 2" -------------- I I I I 4,953 sq. ft. SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 5 w w a U1 _ O m � o�g L Data Description 516-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.1&2016 SDP Submittal No.3 .Ia R 4F'�gEptl �N'rF^ "-24313 Fu' v � CAl\F Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Plan No. 3 Conceptual Floor Plan S.I. 7=1'0" 6 R1-14 PA 3 Copyright Qo MARK GROSS & ASSOCIATES• INC. All rights reserved �l Ad tri Front Elevation Rear Elevation loin oil rnmff! 171 Left Elevation 0 0 O Right Elevation 0 SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE. LAGUINTA CA 92253 oil: MIPAPG "-DAN DwMp11o3 6.16-mo SOP Subm1aw xo.1 9-72016 Pl1"`w4Rwl#wl 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18.2016 SDP Submittal No.3 $�all6i0a�lur� ��9;a 3kGy! 1 ' I 1 T � CR41F SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES li—h . 55.7598.000 Plan No. 4 concept w Bevapm 1 �10 10 =1' D" 16 R1-1 5 PA 3 Copyright ra MARK (MOSS & AS3DCMM INC. All alahu ... - ed Front Elevation Rear Elevation Right Elevation Left Elevation I SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE. LAGUINTA CA 92253 oil: II G o v� "-DAN DwMialloa x19-mo SOP Su9eIIDW No.1 9-72016 Pig"'W4 RwIew 09.19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18.2016 SDP Submittal No.3 W l Si0n'lu. f �CQi313 �'�`A j1 � CR4`F PaojICE Na'M� SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES 55.7598.000 Plan No. 4 conceow a vaum T I 10 =1'-D" R1-16 PA 3 Copy.IEh- A.ARN (MOSS & &MCMM INC. .All xJgkta rm _-d mevduurl t5 KUUT ridrl SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 U A 0 Date Description 516-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.1&2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal 4F'�gE0 A�ry'rFp "C C -24313 Fa' P 9�O 930 Of CAt\F Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Plan No. 4 Conceptual Roof Plans Swle 1/8" =1'-0" 0 2 4 6 6 R1-17 PA 3 Copyright Qo MARK GROSS &ASSOC^IATCES, INC. All rights reserved 4) Office/Yoga Room Option 1341_411 Bedroom & Ba. 5 Option SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 U A 0 Date Description 516-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.1&2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal 4F'�gE0N A�N'rF^ " -24313 Fu' P OP CAl\F Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Plan No. 4 Conceptual Floor Plan Swle 1/8" =1'-0" 6 R1-18 PA 3 Copyright Qo MARK GROSS & ASSOCIATES, INC. All rights reserved rl4� ATTACHMENT 4 City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 PHONE:760.777.7125 FAx:760.777.1233 APPEAL OF DIRECTOR/COMMISSION DECISION APPLICATION CASE NUMBER(s) (OFFICE USE ONLY) Sections A. B and C are to be completed by the applicant in their entirety and shalt be accompanied by afl listed plans, studies, reports and exhibits listed in Section D unless specifically waived bv the appropriate City staff member and noted thereon. SECTION A PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name- Site Development Permit 2016-0005 Please identify the type of action being appealed; ❑ Planning Commission Decision Of October 25, 2016 ❑ Director Decision Public Works Determination ❑ Other Please identify each Design and Development Case No. and/or Condition(s) of Approval being appealed: 1 j Approval of a site plan, architecture and landscaping for a 140 room luxury hotel, 29 hotel -branded residences, a spa, a meeting and conference center, and a shared service facility, for planning areas 2, 3 and 4 of the SllverRock Specific Plan 2) Finding of consistency with Environmental Assessment 2014-1003, Appeal of Planning Comm issionlDirector Decision Application Page 1 of 4 City of La Quinta - Planning Division - 760.777,7125 05,15.16 R\Application Submittal Forms%pplicationslAPL1APL Application - 05.15.Mdoc 253 SECTION B STATEMENT OF APPEAL Please provide sufficient information so as to make clear each issue being appealed and the grounds upon which your appeal is based. Please use additional sheets if needed. See Attached which outlines: 1) VIOLATION OF COACHELLA VALLEY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN FOR ALLOWING TAKE OF SHEEP AND FAILILNG TO BUILD SHEEP BARRIER 2) VIOLATION OF PREVIOUS CITY APPROVALS ISSUED FOR THIS PROJECT FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS REQUIRING SHEEP BARRIER 3) VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR FAILING TO SUPPLEMENT THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW DUE TO CHANCED CONDITIONS AND NEW INFORMATION 4) VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR FAILING TO ENFORCE MITIGATION MEASURES REQUIRING SHEEP BARRIER 5) VIOLATIONS WITH FULLY PROTECTED MAMMAL ACT FOR ALLOWING TAKE OF SHEEP 6) VIOLATIONS WITH ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT FOR ALLOWING TAKE OF SHEEP 7) VIOLATION OF THE PUBLIC TRUST Attached in Support of Appeal: Letter to City Council dated November 8, 2016 Exhibit 1: CDFW PeninsulaBighorn Sheep 2015 Annual Report Exhibit Bighorn Institute Monthly Updates FebruaryOctober 2016 Exhibit 3: Letter from US FWS and CDFWS dated February 28, 2014 Exhibit 4: 60 Day Notice of Intent to Sue dated September 27, 2016 Appeal of Planning Commission/Director Decision Application Page 2 of 4 City of La Quinta - Planning Division - 760.777.7125 05.15.16 P:%pglication+ Submittal Forms\ApplicationsiAPLWL Application - 05.15.16.doc 254 SECTION C - APPLICANVOWNER INFORMATION Applicant D. Wayne Brechtel for Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity (858) 755-6604 (Name) (Phone) 462 Stevens Avenue, Suite 100, Solana Beach, CA 92075 dwWbwordenwilliams.com (Mailing Address) (Ema f) Applicant Certification l certify that l have read this application packet in its entirety and understand the City's appeal process. Applicant's Signature: Date: �r Print Name: Lj r.r 13reck4.-i . A orP%,& pa. I ,0nr ilay.4s Owner Certification 1 certify under the penalty of the laws of the State of California that 1 am the property owner of the property that is the subject matter of this application and l am authorizing and hereby do consent to the filing of this application and acknowledge that the final approval by the City of La Qiuinta, if any, may result in restrictions, limitations and construction obligations being imposed on this real property. Owner/Authorized Agent Signature': Print Narne(s): Date: SECTION D - APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Additional information may be required based on review of the project description. Submittal waivers may be obtained through staff consultation, a pre -submittal meeting, or a preliminary review application. No applications will be accepted by mail, APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS— INITIAL C3 BE COMPLETED BY CITY STAFF # of E- V '� m # of copies DF in P Waiver 2 Each of the followingitems is required for submittal. i� a paper format OK'd by copies ton OD_ (initials) ROM) FILING FEES ❑ NA Filing Fees Receipt 0 1 NA APPLICATION INFORMATION 0 NA Application w/Statement of Appeal 0 1 NA Appeal of Planning Comm ission/Di rector Decision Application Page 3 of City of La Quinta • Planning Division • 760.777.7125 05.15,16 P.1Application Submittal FormslApplicationslAPL1APL Application - 05.15.16.doc 255 SECTION E - SUBMITTAL ITEM DESCRIPTIONS FILING FEES Filing Fees are to be paid at the time of application. As part of the submittal process you will be asked to pay your fees at the Finance Department counter and return to the Planning Division counter with the receipt showing payment of fees which will be copied and submitted along with the other application materials. APPLICATION INFORMATION Application: A City application form complete with all requested information and original signatures provided. Statement of Appeal: The statement of appeal portion (Section B) of the application explains what decision or portion of a decision is being appealed and why. Please be specific and cover all issues you wish to appeal. If you have any questions regarding filling out the Application, pleasecontact the Design and Development Department at (760) 777-7125. Appeal of Planning Commission/Director Decision Application Page 4 of 4 City of La Quinta - Planning Division . 760.777.7125 05.15.16 PAlApplication Submittal FormMApplicationVAPLLAPL Application - 05.15.16.doc 256 Exhibit 1: California Department of Fish and Wildlife Peninsular Bighorn Sheep 2015 Annual Report 257 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE PENINSULAR BIGHORN SHEEP 2015 ANNUAL REPORT A cooperative effort by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and California Department of Parks and Recreation This report presents information on the status, distribution, and management of peninsular bighorn sheep in eastern San Diego County and portions of Riverside and Imperial Counties for 2015 Authors Janene Colby and Randy Botto South Coast Region 258 I I California Department of Fish and Wildlife Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Annual Report 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary.........................................................1 Background......................................................................3 Capture and Radio-collaring..........................................3 Radio Collar Status..........................................................4 Population Size and Estimation....................................5 Respiratory Disease........................................................5 Cause Specific Mortality and Survival ..........................6 Lamb Survival and Recruitment....................................8 Distribution and Movement........................................11 San Jacinto Mountains................................................12 Central Santa Rosa Mountains...................................12 Southern Santa Rosa Mountains................................15 Vallecito Mountains...................................................16 Threats to Recovery.....................................................17 San Jacinto Mountains..............................................17 Northern Santa Rosa Mountains...............................17 Central Santa Rosa Mountains..................................17 Southern Santa Rosa Mountains...............................19 Coyote Canyon...........................................................19 Northern San Ysidro Mountains................................19 Southern San Ysidro Mountains................................20 Vallecito Mountains...................................................20 Carrizo Canyon...........................................................21 FutureActions...............................................................22 Citations.........................................................................23 California Department of Fish and Wildlife South Coast Region 3883 Ruffin Road San Diego, CA. 92123 www.wildlife.ca.gov 259 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni) inhabit the desert slopes of the Peninsular Ranges of southern California and extend into the mountains of Baja California in Mexico. The population within the Peninsular Ranges was first listed as threatened in 1971 under the California Endangered Species Act. In 1974, the population was estimated at 1,171 (Weaver 1975) but by 1996 the rangewide population estimate had declined to only 276 adult sheep (USFWS 2000). Peninsular bighorn sheep were listed as a federally endangered population segment in 1998 (63 FR 13134) due to: 1) habitat fragmentation, degradation, and loss by urban and commercial development; 2) disease; 3) predation coinciding with low population numbers; 4) response to human disturbance; 5) insufficient Iamb recruitment; 6) nonnative toxic plants; and 7) prolonged drought (USFWS 2000). Presently, the population of desert bighorn sheep in the Peninsular Ranges is considered to be stable to increasing based on the most recent 2010 California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) rangewide survey estimate of 955 bighorn sheep. In order for CDFW to estimate ewe (female) abundance it is necessary to maintain radio -collars on at least 25% of the ewes within each of the 9 recovery regions within the Peninsular Ranges. At the beginning of 2015, there were a total of 94 active radio -collars throughout the Peninsular Ranges (89 ewes & 5 rams). This represented only 16% of the ewe population rangewide. During the fall 2015 capture an additional 91 active radio -collars (84 ewes & 7 rams) were deployed in the San Jacinto Mountains (SJM), Northern (NSRM), Central (CSRM) and Southern (SSRM) Santa Rosa Mountains, Coyote Canyon (CoQ Northern (NSYM) and Southern (SSYM) San Ysidro Mountains, and Vallecito Mountains (VM) recovery regions. In 2015, there were 13 radio - collared sheep mortalities (11 ewes and 2 rams). Mortalities by recovery region were: NSRM = 1 ewe, CSRM = 1 ewe, CoC = 2 ewes, SSYM = 1 ewe, VM = 2 ewes, and Carrizo Canyon (CC) = 4 ewes & 2 rams. At the close of 20151 29% of the ewe population was radio -collared with a total of 171 active radio -collars throughout the Peninsular Ranges (161 ewes & 10 rams). A field -based capture is tentatively planned for October 2016 to fill any remaining radio -collared gaps prior to the rangewide population survey in November 2016. From 1992 to 2016, on average, 12% of all active radio -collared sheep died each year of which 7% was due to predation. In 2015, only 7% of all active radio -collared sheep died of which 3.2% were due to predation, 2.2% California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 1 260 the cause was unknown, and 1.6% was attributed to nonpredation. The average age of radio -collared ewes in 2015 was 7.1 years with a range between 1.5 and 19 years (n = 173). In comparison, the average age of radio - collared ewes that died was 12.0 years with a range between 8 and 16 years (n = 11). In 2015, average rangewide survival of radio -collared ewes was 87%. Over the past 5 years (2011 — 2015), average survival of radio -collared ewes from highest to lowest was SJM (100%), followed by VM (98%), NSRM (93%), NSYM (91%), CC (91%), CSRM (88%), CoC (86%), and SSYM (80%). Survival statistics were not available for the SSRM due to lack of radio -collared sheep. CDFW has monitored Iamb survival (survival to 3 months) and recruitment (survival to 1 year = yearlings) within 2 to 5 recovery regions from 2008 to 2015. The percentage of 2015 Iambs that were recruited to yearlings was lowest in CoC (10%), followed by the NSYM (11%), the "urban" ewe group in CSRM (11%), the "wild" ewe group in CSRM (33%), and the IKP ewe group in CC (35%) recovery regions. Typically, Iamb survival levels below 30% indicate the presence of Iamb respiratory disease within a ewe group. Clinical signs of Iamb pneumonia have been documented in all 5 recovery regions; however, rates of Iamb survival and recruitment have varied by ewe group, season, and year. For the past 8 years, the average recruitment ratio has been very low (18%) in both CoC and NSYM. Presently, there is substantial genetic variation and gene flow among bighorn sheep populations within the Peninsular Ranges and across the US -Mexico Border indicating functional connectivity (Buchalski et al. 2015). However, as traffic levels continue to increase connectivity will be lost. The most frequent reports of sheep being killed while attempting to cross roads are on Highways 74 and 78, Interstate 8, and County Roads S22 and S3. Other concerns that may hinder recovery efforts are: disease, the loss of natural water sources, reduction and fragmentation of sheep habitat, habitat modification due to invasive nonnative plants, sheep use of urban areas, and human disturbance of essential sheep habitat especially around the urban centers. Yet, even in more remote regions renewable energy projects, completion of the US -Mexico border fence, mining, and human activities (border enforcement and off -road vehicles) may alter, discourage, or restrict sheep movement and habitat use of important resources. Hopefully, continued efforts by CDFW to monitor sheep health, habitat use, and movements throughout the range will provide federal, state, and local governmental agencies and city planners information to make land and public use decisions that allow for the health and long-term survival of peninsular bighorn sheep. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 2 261 BACKGROUND This annual report highlights capture and radio - collaring, radio -collar monitoring, disease surveillance, cause specific mortality investigation, and Iamb survival monitoring undertaken by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) of bighorn sheep in the Peninsular Mountain Ranges of southern California from 1 January 2015 through 31 December 2015. The Peninsular Mountain Ranges contain 9 designated bighorn sheep recovery regions occupying portions of western Riverside, western Imperial and eastern San Diego Counties (Map 1). The 9 recovery regions are: 1) San Jacinto Mountains (SJM); 2) Northern Santa Rosa Mountains (NSRM); 3) Central Santa Rosa Mountains (CSRM); 4) Southern Santa Rosa Mountains (SSRM); 5) Coyote Canyon (CoQ 6) Northern San Ysidro Mountains (NSYM); 7) Southern San Ysidro Mountains (SSYM); 8) Vallecito Mountains (VM); and 9) Carrizo Canyon (CC). A Cessna 185 fixed -wing aircraft was used to conduct aerial telemetry monitoring at least once a month in all 9 recovery regions. Telemetry flights, however, were not conducted for the first 3 months of 2015 following the retirement of CDFW's southern California Air Services pilot in December 2014. Telemetry flights were recommenced in April 2015 when the vacant pilot position was filled. Flights were used to monitor radio -collared sheep status (alive/dead), obtain location estimates, and download GPS location data. Map 1 Peninsular Bighorn Sheep ORecovery Regions 3,208 km2 1— San Jacinto Mountains-168 km2 2 — N. Santa Rosa Mountains —194 km2 1 -- 3— C. Santa Rosa Mountains —257 km2 4 — S. Santa Rosa Mountains — 562 km2 5 — Coyote Canyon — 250 km2 6 — N. San Ysidro Mountains —86 km2 7 — S. San Ysidro Mountains— 117 km2 2 8 — Va Ilecito Mountains — 708 km2 1 9 — Carrizo Canyon — 866 km2 Riverside 74 USFWS Critical Habitat jf 3 Anza-Borrego Desert State Park City Centers _ Wind Farm Infrastructure County Boundary 5 4 6 86 San Diego 7 Imperial ;r� 78 8 9 �d United States Mexico ` — Kilometers 0 5 10 20 30 40 CDFW conducted ground telemetry monitoring of radio -collared sheep twice a month in all recovery regions except for the SJM and NSRM which were monitored by the Bighorn Institute (BI). Satellite -collared sheep in the SJM, CSRM, SSRM, and VM were monitored every 2 to 5 days with the Iridium Satellite Network that delivers messages and location data via email. Ground monitoring efforts were focused on: 1) mortality investigations; 2) observations of sheep composition, health, and status; and 3) spatial and temporal movements of collared sheep. CAPTURE AND RADIO -COLLARING Capture activities were carried out by CDFW between 27 October and 18 November 2015 on State and Federal Lands throughout the Peninsular Ranges within eastern San Diego, western Imperial and western Riverside counties. Capture of all bighorn sheep was carried out by Leading Edge Aviation under contract with CDFW. Base camp processing of bighorn sheep was carried out by CDFW. Field processing of some bighorn sheep was undertaken by the Leading Edge capture crew. Recovery regions where captures occurred included the SJM, NSRM, CSRM, SSRM, CoC, NSYM, SSYM, and VM (Map 2). Funding for the 2015 Peninsular Ranges bighorn sheep capture was provided by CDFW Big Game Fund, USFWS PR Grant (G1598026), and U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Patrol. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 3 262 Map 2 Peninsular Bighorn Sheep $ 1 Recovery Regions 1 -8 ti.rl 4 — L 2012 Capture Locations • 2013 Capture LocaEons `'.--� ■� _ '°�� ■ 2014 Capture Lacat3ons z ■ 2015 Capture Locations —ter' The project objective was to capture and fit Very High Frequency (VHF), Global Positioning System (GPS) store -on- board, and Iridium Satellite radio -collars to a subset of adult ewes (females) and rams (males) to: 1) maintain collars on approximately 25-30% of the ewe population for mark- resight population estimation survey; 2) better define the temporal and spatial movement patterns of bighorn sheep crossing between targeted recovery regions; 3) better define sheep distribution and ewe group organization in the targeted recover regions; and 4) determine causes of mortality. During 11 days of capture a total of 91 bighorn sheep were captured and fitted with radio -collars (84 ewes & 7 rams). All radio -collared bighorn sheep were fitted with unique combinations of colored radio -collars and ear tags to facilitate individual identification. Of the 84 ewes captured, 28 were deployed with GPS collars, 15 with satellite collars, and 41 with VHF collars. Five rams were fitted with GPS collars and 2 with VHF collars. CDFW conducted regular ground and fixed -wing aerial monitoring of all newly radio -collared bighorn sheep for 1 month post -capture with no mortalities detected. All sheep were captured using a net -gun fired from a helicopter. Thirty-five sheep were radio -collared in the field and 56 sheep were transported to a base camp for health examinations and radio -collaring. All bighorn sheep arrived in base camp in good condition and appeared normal with respect to disease or injuries with the exception of 1 ram in the VM that had a slight nasal discharge and 1 ram and 1 ewe in the SSRM that had existing eye injuries. Twenty-six percent of the captured sheep showed signs of chronic sinusitis based on horn necrosis. At base camp each bighorn sheep was weighed, examined for injuries, body measurements taken, blood, fecal, and nasal swabs collected for disease testing, and radio -collars attached. The average age of ewes captured was 6.1 years with a range from 1.5 to 11.5 years (n = 50). The average age of rams captured was 6.3 years with a range of 3.5 to 8.5 years (n = 6). RADIO -COLLAR STATUS As recommended in the recovery plan for peninsular bighorn sheep (USFWS 2000), CDFW maintains, to the extent possible, active radio -collars on approximately 25-30% of all ewes in each recovery region. Maintaining at least 25% radio -collared (marked) ewes is important for generating reliable mark-resight population estimates based on helicopter surveys. CDFW derives rangewide bighorn sheep population estimates by conducting helicopter surveys in the fall of even numbered years and captures to fit needed radio -collars on sheep during the fall of odd numbered years; however, rangewide helicopter surveys were not conducted in 2012 and 2014 due to lack of a CDFW helicopter contract. A contract has since been executed and a rangewide helicopter survey is planned for fall 2016. Prior to the 2015 capture, only 3 of 9 recovery regions had approximately 25% radio -collared ewes. The objective of the fall 2015 capture was to fill the radio -collared gaps that existed to assure there would be 25% - 30% radio -collared ewes for the 2016 survey. The objective was met in all recovery regions with the exception of the NSRM and CC recovery regions (Table 1). A field - based capture is tentatively planned for fall 2016 to fill the remaining radio -collared gaps prior to the rangewide helicopter population survey. At the beginning of the 2015 reporting period, the 9 recovery regions contained a total of 94 (89 ewes & 5 rams) active radio -collars. During the fall capture an additional 91 (84 ewes & 7 rams) active radio -collars were deployed in all California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 4 263 recovery regions with the exception of the CC recovery region. Radio -collars were lost through mortality in the NSRM, CSRM, CoC, SSYM, VM, and CC recovery regions while 1 radio -collar became non-functional in the CSRM. At the end of 2015 there were a total of 171 (161 ewes & 10 rams) active radio -collars (Table 1). Table 1. Distribution and numbers of active radio -collared female (F) and male (M) bighorn sheep within the 9 recovery regions at the beginning and end of 2015. The recovery regions are: SJM = San Jacinto Mountains, NSRM = Northern Santa Rosa Mountains, CSRM = Central Santa Rosa Mountains, SSRM = Southern Santa Rosa Mountains, CoC = Coyote Canyon, NSYM = Northern San Ysidro Mountains, SSYM = Southern San Ysidro Mountains, VM = Vallecito Mountains, and CC = Carrizo Canyon. The estimated percentage of females radio -collared (% F Collared) at the end of 2015 is based on the ewe abundance estimates from the most recent range -wide helicopter survey in 2010. Category SJM F M NSRM F M CSRM F M SSRM F M CoC F M NSYM F M SSYM F M VM F M CC F M Subtotal F M Grand Total 1 /1 /2015 6 0 5 0 12 0 1 0 6 0 10 0 1 0 20 0 28 5 89 5 94 additions 5 2 6 12 22 2 8 3 14 14 3 84 7 91 mortalities 1 1 2 1 2 3 2 10 2 12 censored 2 2 2 12/31/2015 11 2 10 0 21 0 23 2 12 0 13 0 14 0 32 3 25 3 161 10 171 % F Collared 42% 23% 30% 27% 26% 33% 39% 40% 18% 29% POPULATION SIZE AND ESTIMATION The most recent rangewide estimate of 955 bighorn sheep was conducted by CDFW in 2010 and the population is considered to be stable to increasing (Table 2). A detailed review of population estimates, ewe abundance, and lamb:ewe ratios from 1993 to 2010 can be found in the CDFW 2012 Annual Report (https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Mam mals/Bighorn-Sheep/Desert/Peninsular). A rangewide population survey is planned for fall of 2016. RESPIRATORY DISEASE Table 2. Peninsular bighorn sheep population estimates for each recovery region for years 2006, 2008 and 2010 based on CDFW helicopter surveys. Map of recovery regions depicts the adjusted population estimate by including Bighorn Institute's 2014 estimates for the San Jacinto and Northern Santa Rosa Mountains. Approximately 66% of the area within the recovery regions lies within ABDSP; and approximately 600 of the estimated 961 bighorn sheep are within the Park. Recovery Regions 2006 Year 2008 2010 SJM 21 26 16 NSRM 49 77 90 CSRM 163 122 133 SSRM 179 155 149 CDC 42 52 66 NSYM 79 82 72 SSYM 38 53 55 VM 77 123 142 CC 145 186 232 Total 793 876 955 Disease epizootics (analogous to disease epidemics in humans) are a major limiting factor in restoring large, healthy, wild sheep populations throughout western North America (Singer et al. 2000). Likewise, disease epizootics were the major contributing factor for declines in peninsular bighorn sheep populations from the 1970s to the mid-1990s (Fredrickson and Mills 2010). Clinical signs of pneumonia (coughing, nasal discharge, droopy ears, lethargy, and weight loss) were first noted in the 1970s in the NSRM and within some areas of Anza-Borrego Desert state park (USFWS 2000). Consequently, a study conducted by the Bighorn Institute from Peninsular Recovery Regions 40 Total Population Estimate 961 SJM* Area = 3208 km2 772 NSRM* 133 CSRM 149 Coc SSRM 66 72 NSYM 36 ssYM VM Anza-Borrego 233 2 Desert State Park CC 600 Area =2,127 km' .l 0 5 10 20 30 40 161ane4e±5 1981 to 1984 concluded that pneumonia was the major cause of high Iamb mortality within the NSRM (DeForge and Scott 1982). Pneumonia -induced mortality in Iambs continues to be a problem in many recovery regions throughout the Peninsular Ranges (Colby and Botta 2012). CDFW and collaborators have actively been investigating the causative pathogen or pathogens and the possible factors that drive the timing, duration, and severity of respiratory disease outbreaks within the Peninsular Ranges. The original pathogens causing respiratory diseases in wild sheep were most likely introduced by domestic sheep (via nose -to -nose contact) as indicated by both empirical and laboratory studies (Lawrence et al. 2010, and Wehausen et al. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 5 264 2011). Initially, a pneumonia epizootic typically causes an all -age die -off (adults and Iambs) followed by up to 12 years of either sporadic or persistent high rates of pneumonia in Iambs (Cassirer and Sinclair 2007, Cassirer et al. 2013). There have likely been multiple independent pathogens responsible for pneumonia epizootics at different times and locations within bighorn sheep habitat including bovine respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza-3 virus, and Pasteurella and Mannheimia spp. (Rudolph et al. 2007, and Besser et al. 2008). Recently, the bacterium Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae (hereafter referred to as M.ovi) has been identified as the primary pathogen associated with pneumonia in wild sheep populations throughout the western United States (Besser et al. 2008, and Besser et al. 2012). In California, between 2013 and 2015, M.ovi was the primary pathogen detected in 11 of 15 cases (73%) of bronchopneumonia in bighorn sheep submitted for post-mortem testing at California Animal Health & Food Safety Laboratory System (CAHFS). In the Peninsular Ranges, results from blood samples collected from wild sheep captured from 1999 to 2015 found that approximately 51% of sheep in each recovery region tested positive for the presence of M.ovi (Testing performed by Washington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory at Washington State University). In the Peninsular Ranges, pneumonia -induced mortality in Iambs typically peaks when Iambs are between 1 and 3 months of age at a time when ewes and Iambs are concentrated within nursery groups. A ewe carrying the pathogen can transmit the infection to her Iamb —the Iamb can then transmit the pathogen to other Iambs within the nursery group. Varying rates (asynchronous) of Iamb mortality among ewe groups and years is likely due to differences in the number of infected and pathogen shedding ewes, the virulence and timing of pathogen introduction, and the exposure (contact) rates (Cassirer et al. 2013, and Plowright et al. 2013). Environmental factors may also contribute to asynchronous rates of pneumonia -induced mortality in Iambs. In the Peninsular Ranges, the density of ewes and Iambs as well as the duration within nursery grounds is dependent on the quality and quantity of vegetation available (J. Colby, CDFW unpubl. data). During drought years, when forage conditions are poor, there is a low density of ewes and Iambs for a short duration within nursery grounds which may decrease both the probability of the correct timing of pathogen introduction and the exposure rates to Iambs. Reciprocally, during wet years, when forage conditions are good, there is a high density of ewes and Iambs for a longer duration within nursery grounds which may increase both the probability of the correct timing of pathogen introduction and exposure rates to Iambs. Consistent, high quality forage conditions, such as those provided by golf courses, allow large numbers of ewes and Iambs to concentrate within a very small area for prolonged periods of time and thus may facilitate the spread of disease to a larger percentage of the Iambs within the nursery group. A Iamb's health status prior to infection may influence the probability of surviving a bout of pneumonia. In the NSYM, Iambs observed with diarrhea and weight loss prior to exhibiting signs of pneumonia were less likely to survive than Iambs without diarrhea and weight loss (J. Colby, CDFW unpubl. data). The cause of chronic diarrhea is not known; however, Iambs and ewes in NSYM readily consume Sahara mustard (Brassica tournefortii), a non-native herbaceous annual containing glucosinolates that can be toxic to wildlife (Horn and Vaughan 1983). Diarrhea has also been observed in sick Iambs at the golf courses in La Quinta. Sulfate -based fertilizer application to golf course grasses can result in induced copper deficiencies in sheep. Copper deficiencies in sheep can result in diarrhea, weight loss, ataxia (loss of coordination), and decreased resistance to diseases (Scott 2007). Low copper levels have been documented in Iambs that have died of pneumonia at the golf courses in La Quinta (refer to section on Lamb Survival and Recruitment). Outbreaks of infectious disease in wild sheep are difficult if not impossible to manage. Tools used in domestic livestock such as treatment and vaccination are impractical and generally ineffective when applied to wild populations. Geographic separation of domestic sheep and goats from bighorn habitat is the only sure method to reduce the risk of disease outbreaks (Dr. Ben Gonzales, CDFW Senior Wildlife Veterinarian pers. comm.) CAUSE -SPECIFIC MORTALITY AND SURVIVAL Because population viability is most sensitive to changes in ewe survival (Ruben et al. 2002), it is important to document survival and mortality statistics within the Peninsular Ranges in order to make cogent management decisions. In 2015, there were 13 (11 ewes and 2 rams) radio -collared sheep mortalities (Table 3). Mortalities by recovery region were: NSRM = 1 ewe; CSRM = 1 ewe; CoC = 2 ewes, SSYM = 1 ewe; VM = 2 ewes; and CC = 4 ewes & 2 rams. From 1992-2015, California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 6 265 on average, 12% of all active radio -collared sheep died each year. During this period of time, lion predation and probable lion predation combined accounted for 7% of the mortalities. In 2015, only 7% of all active radio -collared sheep died. Of this percentage 3.2% were attributed to predation, probable predation, or possible predation combined, 2.2% the cause was unknown, and 1.6% was attributed to nonpredation. Deaths were categorized as nonpredation when the exact cause Of death was Table 3. Cause of death for 13 radio -collared bighorn sheep by recovery region and ewe group unknown but predation could be ruled out within the Peninsular Ranges of Southern California from January 1 to December 31, 2015. Carrizo as a possible cause. The average age Of = Carrizo ewe group, IKP = In-Ko-Pah ewe group, and TB = Tierra Blanca ewe group all within the radio -collared ewes in 2015 was 7.1 years Carrizo Canyon Recovery Region. with a range between 1.5 and 19 years (n — Region(Ewe Group) sheep ID Sex Age Month cause 173). In comparison, the average age of NSRM BI F 12 May Possible Lion Predation CSRM 9000 F 15 March Unknown radio -collared ewes that died was 12.0 Coc 214 F 8 January Unknown years with a range between 8 and 16 years CoC 213 F 16 November Nonpredation (n = 11). The average age of ewe deaths ssyM 208 F 15 January Probable Lion Predation attributed to predation combined was 12.3 Vallecito 210 F 12 February Possible Lion Predation years with a range between 10 and 15 vallecito 325 F 9 May Nonpredation years (n = 4). Age related disease and/or Carrizo 191* F 13 May Nonpredation poor health were noted in 3 of the 4 ewe Carrizo 307 F 8 September Unknown deaths attributed to predation. Ewes that Carrizo 228 F 14 December Unknown Carrizo (IKP) 279 F 10 February Probable Lion Predation died of nonpredation causes were slightly Carrizo (IKP) 280 M 8 April Probable Lion Predation older with an average age of 12.7 years and Carrizo (TB) 332 M 8 November Lion Predation a range between 9 and 16 years (n = 3). In *Nonfunctioning collar since 2012-Ewe was found byhiker all deaths attributed to nonpredation, signs of long-term disease such as chronic sinusitis, low amount of body fat, and/or tooth infections were found during mortality investigations. The average age of sheep deaths categorized as unknown was 11.3 years with a range of 8 to 15 years (n = 4). Age related disease and/ or poor health were noted in 3 of 4 ewe deaths categorized as unknown. Two male radio -collared sheep died due to predation and possible predation. Both 8 year -old rams resided in the CC recovery region and appeared healthy at time of death. However, inferences concerning causes of death and death rates among the ram population cannot be made due to the small number radio -collared rangewide. Table 4. Annual Kaplan-Meir survival rates (modified to allow for staggered entry of new animals) for Within the Peninsular Ranges, ewe female bighorn sheep in the Peninsular Ranges of Southern California. Data were collected by CDFW survival rates can vary by recovery in regions 5 through 9 from 1994 to 2015 and in regions 1 through 3 from 2011 to 2015. In regions 5 — region, year and month. 9: red = lowest survival rate for each region, blue = survival rates below 70%. Additionally the reliability Of Year 1-SJM 2-NSRM 3-CSRM 4-SSRM 5-CoC 6-NSYM 7-SSYM 8-VM 9-CC 1994 63% 77% 75% 63% 82% 1995 60% 100% 67% 75% 71% 1996 67% 80% 100% 100% 60% 1997 100% 100% 100% 33% 100% 1998 90% 88% 60% 88% 100% 1999 75% 86% 50% 80% 100% 2000 89% 71% 100% 91% 100% 2001 88% 60% 100% 92% 100% 2002 78% 75% 83% 91% 91% 2003 100% 100% 100% 100% 70% 2004 90% 75% 92% 86% 100% 2005 100% 100% 82% 90% 75% 2006 56% 90% 82% 92% 100% 2007 80% 89% 67% 100% 100% 2008 90% 91% 75% 92% 92% 2009 89% 80% 67% 100% 91% 2010 93% 100% 75% 100% 92% 2011 100% 100% 90% 100% 85% 83% 100% 100% 2012 100% 100% 89% 86% 73% 90% 100% 100% 2013 100% 100% 88% 75% 100% 67% 100% 67% 2014 100% 83% 83% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2015 100% 80% 92% 67% 100% 90% 89% average 100% 93% 88% 83% 87% 81% 89% 90% survival rates is influenced by the percentage of radio -collared sheep within each recovery region at any given point in time. In regions 5 through 9, survival statistics have been collected since 1994 to present and thus serve as a good index of ewe survival within these regions. Survival statistics for regions 1 — 3 were added in 2011 after CDFW South Coast Region assumed responsibility for rangewide monitoring. Presently, survival rates are not available for region 4; however, radio -collars were deployed in 2015 and thus survival data for this region will be available starting in 2016. In 2015, average rangewide survival of California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 7 266 radio -collared ewes was 87%: survival was highest in SJM (100%) and NSYM (100%) and lowest in CoC (67%: Table 4). 2015 survival statistics were not available in the SSRM and SSYM due to lack of radio -collared animals. In regions 5 through 9 from 1993 to 2015, the average survival rate from highest to lowest was CC (90%), followed by VM (89%), NSYM (87%), CoC (83%), and SSYM (81%). Over the past 5 years (2011 — 2015), rangewide average survival of radio - collared ewes from highest to lowest was SJM (100%), followed by VM (98%), NSRM (93%), NSYM (91%), CC (91%), CSRM (88%), CoC (86%), and SSYM (80%). In the SSYM, data were not collected in 2014 and 2015, but the overall low survival rate and trend is of concern within this recovery region. The trend in the CSRM is also of concern, however, up until 2015 there may not have been enough radio -collared ewes to accurately represent the greater CSRM population. Also of concern are low survival rates within CoC in 3 of the past 5 years. Documentation and mortality investigations of non -collared sheep deaths and/or injuries rely on the willingness and ability of the general public and government agencies to contact either CDFW or BI. Because these mortalities are found by chance alone, they are not necessarily representative of the overall sheep population. In 2015, there were 12 non - collared sheep deaths reported with the majority due to urban related causes (3 ewes, 5 rams, and 4 Iambs). Two rams and 1 ewe were killed by vehicles on Highway 74 located between the NSRM and CSRM recovery regions (Map 13). In the CSRM, a young ram was killed on Jefferson Avenue in La Quinta: a distance of almost % of a mile from the nearest mountains (Figure 1). One ram and 1 ewe were killed by vehicles on the east -bound lanes of Interstate 8 in the CC recovery region (Map 15). In September, a yearling Figure 1. A young ram was struck and killed (red X) by a vehicle while crossing Jefferson Street in ram was killed by a lion along coyote La Quinta California on 6/13/2015. Creek in CoC and in December a pregnant ewe was killed by a lion in Moonlight Canyon within the Tierra Blanca Mountains in the CC recovery region. Details of Iamb mortalities are reported in the Lamb Survival and Recruitment section below. LAMB SURVIVAL AND RECRUITMENT CDFW has monitored Iamb survival (survival to 3 months) and recruitment (survival to 1 year = yearlings) in the CoC, NSYM and SSYM recovery regions since 2008, and in the In-Ko-Pah (IKP) ewe group (within the CC recovery region) since 2010. Details and descriptive statistics concerning Iamb production, timing of parturition, Iamb survival to 3 months, onset of Iamb sickness, and timing of Iamb deaths can be found in the CDFW 2012 Annual Report. In 2015, Iamb survival and recruitment monitoring in the CSRM was initiated. Lamb:ewe ratios (number of Iambs per 100 ewes) and yearling:ewe ratios (number of yearlings per 100 ewes), based on group observations, are used as indices of Iamb survival and recruitment. Clinical signs of Iamb pneumonia have been documented in all 5 recovery regions; however, rates of Iamb survival and recruitment have varied by ewe group, season, and year (Table 5). For the past 8 years, the average recruitment ratio has been very low (18%) in both CoC and NSYM. Typically, Iamb survival levels below 30% indicate the presence of Iamb respiratory disease within a ewe group. Furthermore, persistently low recruitment levels due to reoccurring pneumonia epizootics in Iambs may pose a significant obstacle in population recovery (Cassirer and Sinclair 2007). California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 8 267 Table 5. Index of Iamb survival to 3-months-old (Survival) and recruitment of Iambs to yearlings (Recruited) from 2008 — 2015 in CoC, NSYM, SSYM, IKP ewe group in CC, Urban ewe group in CSRM and Wild ewe group in CSRM. Three-month Iamb survival was calculated from lamb:ewe ratios from group observations obtained from May -June of the year Iambs were born and matched with yearling:ewe ratios (recruited) from January - June of the following year. For example in 2015 in NSYM, 19% of Iambs survived to 3-months-old (Survival), and 11% survived to yearlings (Recruited) in 2016. a Data for recruitment has not yet been calculated for CoC and SSYM. Year CoC Survival Recruited NSYM Survival Recruited SSYM Survival Recruited IKP-CC Survival Recruited Urban CSRM Survival Recruited Wild CSRM Survival Recruited 2008 66% 21% 43% 21% 64% 29% 2009 51% 31% 30% 24% 41% 18% 2010 37% 24% 14% 19% 61% 28% 79% 39% 2011 56% 4% 21% 3% 58% 17% 63% 20% 2012 36% 7% 13% 13% 63% 38% 70% 45% 2013 26% 7% 7% 18% 93% 51% 26% 2014 25% 22% 38% 34% * 27% 10% 8% * 35% * 38% 2015 21% a 19% 11% 47% a 86% 35% 53% 11% 66% 36% Average 40% 18% 23% 18% 61% 25% 60% 29% 53% 23% 66% 36% Central Santa Rosa Mountains: Health monitoring of Iambs in this tx recovery region commenced in 2015 after sheep were radio -collared in October 2014. Presently, in the CSRM 4 ewe groups have been ., identified; 3 of these ewe groups have not been documented .+ foraging at golf courses surrounding the city of La Quinta (hereafter referred to as "wild sheep") while the fourth ewe group regularly - forages at golf courses (hereafter referred to as "urban sheep").� Yearling:ewe ratios obtained in 2015 indicated a high rate of Iamb recruitment from 2014 for both urban and wild sheep groups in the _ CSRM (Table 5). In 2015, the peak of parturition occurred in + February. Average Iamb survival to 3 months was high in both urban - (53%) and wild sheep (66%) groups; however, Iamb recruitment -' within the urban group dropped precipitously post-3-months with ' only 11% of the Iambs born in 2015 surviving their first year compared to 36% in the wild group (Table 5). Furthermore, only 1 of the 4 Iambs belonging to urban radio -collared ewes survived through 2015. In April, 1 Iamb was observed with mild symptoms of Photo bv J. Colbv respiratory disease within the wild sheep group. In the urban group, Photo 1. Yearling ewe at SilverRock golf course with diarrhea. a few Iambs and several yearlings and ewes, including pregnant collared ewe 349, were observed with diarrhea at SilverRock golf course (Photo 1). Also in April, a sick Iamb found at a residence in PGA West golf community was removed by Riverside County Animal Control and taken to their facility. Unfortunately, because wild sheep are extremely susceptible to diseases carried by domestic animals, this Iamb could not be treated and returned to its mother. The Iamb was taken to the Living Desert Museum and diagnosed and treated for bronchopneumonia: lab results identified the bacterium M.ovi as the likely causative agent. By May, all of the Iambs at the golf course, including those belonging to four collared ewes were showing mild to severe symptoms of respiratory disease. Mild symptoms of respiratory disease are coughing and nasal discharge but with good body weight and no droopy ears whereas severe symptoms include nasal discharge, droopy ears, lethargy, and weight loss (Photo 2). Also in May, CDFW personnel removed a moribund Iamb from the SilverRock Golf Course. The 3-month-old male Iamb was taken to the California Animal Health and Food Safety Lab (CAHFS) in San Bernardino where it was humanely euthanized. Necropsy and test results indicated that the Iamb had bronchopneumonia with the main bacterial infectious agent identified as M.ovi. Additionally, lab results showed the Iamb had intestinal coccidiosis, low levels of hepatic copper, and high levels of zinc all of which contributed to a poor immune status and predisposed the Iamb to bacterial California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 9 268 Photo 2. The Iamb on the left had pneumonia — droopy ears, nasal discharge, extremely thin, poor coat condition, and lethargic. Typically, when Iambs get this sick they no longer cough (mild symptoms are nasal discharge and cough but with no droopy ears and good body weight). In comparison, the Iamb in photo B is healthy — head held high, ears up, good body weight (rounded hindquarters), and good coat condition. infections. In August, a male Iamb was found dead in the Coachella Canal terminus at Lake Cahuilla by Coachella Valley Water District personnel. The Iamb was retrieved by CDFW personnel and taken to CAHFS for postmortem examination. The cause of death could not be determined due to severe postmortem decomposition but gross and microscopic changes were suggestive of drowning as the possible cause of death. Gross examination of the lungs did not indicate this Iamb had pneumonia. Toxicology results indicated a low liver copper concentration which can contribute to ill thrift, decreased resistance to other diseases, diarrhea, ataxia (loss of coordination) and at extremely low levels, death may occur. In 2015, the spread of disease among urban Iambs was most likely facilitated by ewes and their Iambs concentrated at the golf courses. Furthermore, sick Iambs are more vulnerable to predation but because urban Iambs have lost their natural wariness they may be at higher risk of predation compared to wild Iambs. Coyote Canyon: The 2015 Iamb survival ratio of 21% indicated respiratory disease was once again an issue within this recovery region (recruitment data have yet to be assessed: Table 5). In June, a male Iamb was killed by a bobcat near Coyote Creek. Gross necropsy findings indicated the Iamb may have been suffering from respiratory disease prior to being killed. Sick Iambs will often spend more time near a water source and therefore are more vulnerable to predation. Northern San Ysidro Mountains: In 2014, Iamb survival (38%) and recruitment (34%) was much higher than the previous 6 years (Table 5). Unfortunately, in 2015, Iamb survival (19%) and recruitment (11%) were again extremely low. The peak of parturition for this ewe group has shifted from February to January; and in late January 2015, the first symptoms of disease were observed in a 2-week-old Iamb with diarrhea and a severe cough. The Iambs of 2 radio -collared ewes were also observed with diarrhea, cough, and nasal discharge. Most symptoms of disease were first observed when Iambs were between 3 and 7 weeks of age. Of the 20 radio -collared ewes (7 were non-functioning collared ewes) monitored in 2015, 12 ewes (60%) lost their Iambs to pneumonia, 2 Iambs survived (10%) but had displayed mild symptoms of respiratory disease, 2 ewes did not have Iambs (a 16-year-old ewe and a 2 year -old -ewe), and the pregnancy status of 4 ewes was unknown. While most symptoms of respiratory disease were seen in Iambs, 5 radio -collared ewes and 3 non - collared sheep also showed mild symptoms of respiratory disease. For example, in February, collared ewe 315 was observed with nasal discharge and another non -collared adult ewe was seen coughing (both were in good body condition). In May, a 2-year-old ram was observed with a dry-hacky cough and another 2-year-old ewe was in poor body condition. In early July, collared ewe 311 was observed coughing several times. In August collared ewes 185, 308, and 316 were observed coughing. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 10 269 Southern San Ysidro Mountains: There were no radio -collared ewes present in this recovery region until November 2015; therefore, most observations of Iambs were opportunistic with little detailed information. Two Iambs were seen with symptoms of respiratory disease but both Iambs had good body weight and were over 3 months old. During the annual ABDSP 4th of July waterhole count only 8 ewes and 8 rams were counted with no Iambs observed during the 3 day count. Based on this information, a CDFW field biologist and volunteer spent 3 days in August near water sources and obtained a lamb:ewe ratio of 47% and a yearling:ewe ratio of 22%. However, average recruitment since 2008 has been below 30% except in 2012 (Table 5). Low Iamb recruitment levels in conjunction with a low average annual ewe survival rate (81%: Table 4) may indicate this is a declining recovery region. Hopefully, with the recent addition of radio - collared ewes within the SSYM we will be able to monitor this recovery region more thoroughly in the future. Carrizo Canyon: There are 4 ewe groups within this recovery region: Tierra Blanca, Carrizo, In-Ko-Pah (IKP), and Jacumba. While group observations were obtained in all 4 ewe groups, Iamb survival and recruitment ratios are only reported for the IKP ewe group which has been consistently monitored since 2010. In the past 6 years, average Iamb survival (60%) and recruitment (29%) has been good (Table 5). Prior to 2014, each year a few Iambs were observed with symptoms of respiratory disease but typically signs were not severe. Starting in 2014 there was an increase in symptoms of severe pneumonia with a subsequent drop in Iamb survival (10%) and recruitment (8%). In 2015, Iamb survival (86%) and recruitment (35%) ratios rebounded tremendously. Two sets of twins were confirmed within the IKP ewe group in 2015: one set belonged to a non -collared ewe and the other set belonged to collared ewe 233 (Photo 3). Ewe 233 was observed on multiple occasions nursing 2 female Iambs at the same time; furthermore, her twins �T survived through weaning. Of the 9 marked ewes that had Iambs in IKP in 2015, only 1 Iamb did not survive through the first 4 months. However, if the IKP ewe group is to follow the same pattern seen in other ewe groups where respiratory disease has been introduced, the general pattern will be for decreasing or chronically low Iamb survival and recruitment interspersed occasionally with high recruitment levels. The Indication thus far at the writing of this report is for a poor year of Iamb survival in 2016. Respiratory disease is also impacting Iambs within the Carrizo ewe group. In June, a dead Iamb was found by a hiker along the railroad tracks in Carrizo Canyon. A CDFW biologist Photo by J. Young performed a field necropsy: gross findings were indicative of bronchopneumonia and lab results identified M.ovi as the likely causative Photo 3. Ewe 233 with two female twins pathogen. In the Tierra Blanca ewe group, Iamb survival through the summer nursing —Spring 2015. appeared to be high. In August, 13 Iambs and 20 ewes were consistently seen in the Agua Caliente County Park campground. While all Iambs were active and had good body weight, a few Iambs exhibited mild symptoms of respiratory disease. Twins were also confirmed in this ewe group for a total of 3 sets of twins documented in the CC recovery region for 2015. DISTRIBUTION AND MOVEMENT Presently, remote download and Satellite GPS collars are deployed in the highest numbers with the best representative distribution within each recovery region than at any other time. Population structure and abundance rangewide was last described in 1998 (Rubin et al. 1998); however, the study relied on direct observations for documenting ewe group structure and movement patterns rather than detailed GPS location data. In 2017, CDFW will update and fully describe population structure, movement, and abundance based on current GPS data and the abundance estimate that will be obtained during the fall 2016 rangewide helicopter population survey. Past CDFW annual reports have described habitat use, distribution, and movement patterns in CoC, NSYM, SSYM (2012 Annual Report), and CC recovery regions (2014 Annual Report). This report will describe preliminary results on ewe group structure and movement patterns obtained from location data collected from November 2014 through 2015 in the CSRM and VM recovery regions. We will also briefly describe preliminary location data collected from satellite collars deployed on females within the SJM and SSRM recovery regions. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 11 270 Map 3 Chino Canyon TTachevah Canyon �Fa _k ,a Tahquitz Creek V e • � 0 4 • ,'a Andreas Canyon a Murray Canyon West Fork Palm Canyon +.1. + 11 41 s - a a kilc nsrG. San Jacinto Mountains: The SJM recovery region is approximately 168 square kilometers (km2) with a density of approximately 0.24 sheep per kmZ (based on 2010 abundance estimate). In November 2015, satellite collars were deployed on 5 ewes and GPS collars were deployed on 2 rams; however, GPS data on the rams is "store -on -board" and has not yet been obtained. Thus far, location data from November 2015 to May 2016 show a home range use of approximately 32 kmZ with core use centered on the south side of Chino Canyon and within Tahquitz Creek Canyon (Map 3). Two collared ewes spent time south of Tahquitz: Ewe 431 spent November and December between Tahquitz and Murray Canyons while ewe 432 spent the month of January south of the West fork of Palm Canyon. Central Santa Rosa Mountains: The CSRM recovery region is approximately 257 kmZ with a density of approximately 0.52 sheep per kmZ (based on 2010 abundance estimate). Location data reported extends from November 2014 to March 2016 and represents the combined locations of 3 satellite and 10 GPS-collared ewes. Data have not yet been collected on 4 ewes captured in the southern region of CSRM and thus the data reported here do not fully represent all radio -collar movements. To date, data from GPS-collared ewes have identified 4 ewe groups within the CSRM as defined by habitat use patterns (Map 4). Three ewe groups do not use any artificial water and forage Map 4 La Quipta CSRM r Tradrio Ewe Groups IverRock West Home Range 57 km2 La Qulnta Deep canyon Cove - Urban Home Range 16 kmz PGA West South A Home Range 112 km2 South R Home Range 115 km2 sear Creek .,r The Quarry Golf Courses dN �, � Natural Water Sources .r —Highways 13 Devil Canyon ik'�4 - ? j Guadalupe Creek Toro Canyon � Alta Agua Canyon _ Martinez Canyon Sheep Canyon Ole 4, ,u t rm yJ+A�r r - ��._ n iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiKlorant— resources while the fourth ewe group spends the majority of their time either within or near the golf course communities in La Quinta. We define a ewe group as a group of ewes that share the same nursery grounds and the same summer water sources. However, within each ewe group there is some sub -structuring, or subset of ewes, that spend the majority of the year with their adopted ewe group and a small portion of the year with their natal ewe group. We define these individuals or subgroups of ewes as "bridge ewes" since they often bridge the social and physical discontinuities or gaps between ewe groups within a region or across regions. While the seasonal movement patterns of these ewes are atypical, they most likely play an important role in gene flow among populations but may contribute to the spread of disease as well. The home range used by the "West" ewe group encompasses approximately 57 kmZ and extends 12 km from east to west and 7 km from north to south (Map 5). The western boundary abuts highway 74 which acts as a barrier to free sheep movement. The eastern boundary ends just west California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 12 271 of The Quarry Golf community in La Quinta. The northern boundary surrounds Indio Mountain and the southern boundary ends around Guadalupe Creek. The most heavily used core area is in the lower portion of Deep Canyon and ` Guadalupe Creek -.rf!__ �J C'• 1 3 -0 rr�� lume7�is Map 6 .` �` T.. Tradition - %r ILI Coy I °teC 4a Quinta Cove n+F' IL( PPk Ar� i tig_ H" Bear Creek Devil Canyon _ Guadalupe Creek SilverRock extends into Coyote Creek which is used as a movement corridor into the eastern portion of their range. Lambing habitat has been documented in the areas surrounding Coyote Creek. Summer activity is not centered on a single water source but, instead, ewes move between water sources in Deep Canyon, Bear Creek, and Guadalupe Creek (Map 6). To date, this ewe group has not used any artificial water sources or habitat within the urban environment. Ewes in the southern portion of the CSRM received radio -collars in November of 2015 and home range definition presented here is preliminary. It is not yet clear whether ewes within this area should be defined as two ewe groups or one ewe group with extensive sub -structuring. The home range used by ewe group "South -A" encompasses 112 km2 and is approximately 19 km in length and 10 km in width (Map 7). The northern end is on the slopes above the La Quinta golf courses and the southern terminus is just south of Sheep Canyon. Ewe group "South-B" encompasses 115 km2 and is approximately 19 km in length and 12 km in width. The northern end starts at Toro Canyon and the southern end is just south of Barton Canyon. The official boundary between the CSRM and SSRM recovery regions passes through Martinez Canyon (Map 7); however, these two ewe groups overlap extensively to the north and south of this artificial boundary in the areas surrounding Toro, Alta Agua, Martinez, and Sheep Canyons. Of note is the "donut -like" hole above Martinez Canyon created by the lack of sheep locations within this area. Toro, Alta Agua and Martinez Canyons all drain into this 6 by 4 km valley and is a good example of how sheep prefer to spend the majority of their time on the steep slopes surrounding this valley rather than venturing into it, where the habitat is less safe relative to predators. The true southern boundary for the South-B ewe group may extend farther south than Barton Canyon. Location data from radio -collared ewe 409 (captured in Toro Canyon) have not yet been obtained but in January her VHF signal was detected in the SSRM around Big Wash. This ewe may serve as a bridge between the South ewe groups and the ewe groups within the SSRM. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 13 272 • 'Map 7 Tradition CSRM La quints SilverRock South Ewe Groups Sou[hASheep Deep Canyon -Sau[h West CX"LThhe B Sheep So uthA H c m e R singe 112 k m2 South B home Range 115 km2 Recovery Reg— 3 & 4 Bear Creek 0 ,arry —Boundary la hottveen Region 384 +`- I. - DevillCanyon c IfC N atural 'Nater Sources CSRM Guadalupe Creek 'alt`�" _ - —Highways "mow -. - - Toro Canyon Alta Ag Canyon - Martinez Canyo rsYtix t ei- by 10 i/ .' ,•,� SSRM {.! Alano Canyon ®ffiw N i-, _ �• Barton Canyon 141ometers i-, ME, uti w `, eye :�' - ;• �` '. } s �a Qulnta ` CoveN. I -yt.. CSRM Urban Ewe Group Shpzp Locations on Golf Courses s:5roup Core Area 2 km2 r �r Group Home. Range 10 km 2 The home range used by the "Urban" ewe group encompasses approximately 16 kM2 and is 3.5 times smaller than the West ewe group home range and 7 times smaller than the South ewe groups home ranges (Map 8). The north boundary is Tradition golf course and the southern boundary is just south of The Quarry golf community. The western boundary is La Quinta Cove and the easternmost boundary is the PGA West golf community. The core use areas are SilverRock and PGA West golf courses and the desert slopes overlooking those courses. The Urban ewe group is the newest group within the CSRM and most likely formed from ewes that splintered off from the West and South ewe groups. Rams have been documented using the golf courses in La Quinta since 2007 but ewes and Iambs did not start using the golf courses regularly until 2012. Ewes and their Iambs quickly became habituated to the urban environment and their movement patterns and behaviors contrast strongly with those of their wild neighbors. There is a misperception that due to drought conditions in sheep habitat the ewes and their Iambs "need" the water sources and green grasses that are supplied by the golf courses. However, there are 3 other ewe groups in the CSRM that are thriving without artificial food and water sources even during drought conditions (Maps 5, 6, & 7). Desert bighorn sheep typically have large home ranges because they must move from one area to the next as the quality and quantity of food sources change throughout the seasons. Wild sheep behavior is driven by the constant need to satisfy their nutritional requirements while staying safe from predators. Steep slopes with good visibility afford the safest habitat from predators but riskier habitat such as riparian areas, alluvial fans, and canyon washes can provide the highest quality forage during some seasons. Wild sheep must constantly balance the risks of predation against benefit of higher quality forage. Ewes with young Iambs will often choose safer habitat over greener habitat or minimize time within risky habitat while remaining vigilant. Sheep that forage within the urban setting have learned to overcome their innate fear of humans, loud noises, vehicles, and flat open areas far from escape terrain. This "casual" behavior that lacks the natural vigilance and wariness that is innate to wild sheep makes urban sheep more vulnerable to predation, as well as other dangers such as vehicle collisions, consumption of toxic plants, and drowning in pools and canals. Urban sheep no longer behave in a manner that is most conducive to their long term health and survival. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 14 273 There is also a perception that because the golf courses provide such high quality forage that the urban Iambs are thriving and that each year the number of sheep at the golf courses increase. In reality, only 11% of Iambs born in 2015 to urban ewes survived through their first year. Most likely, the increase is mainly due to additional wild sheep in surrounding areas joining the Urban ewe group. For example, currently there are 2 radio -collared ewes that appear to be in the process of this transition. Ewe 353, radio -collared in November 2014, does not easily fall within the patterns of any of the CSRM ewe groups but most likely originally belonged to the South -A ewe group (Map 9). In 2015, this ewe spent only 1 day in March and 1 day in August on the SilverRock golf course: then in December, golf course use was increased to 10 days. Most likely, ewe 353 was on the slopes above the golf course and followed "urban" sheep onto the course. Starting in January 2016, ewe 353 used the golf course 21 days out of 31, but returned to safer habitat during lambing season in February. It is possible that in the next few years this ewe will complete the transition to the Urban ewe group. Ewe 417, radio -collared in November 2015, belongs to the South -A ewe group and travels from the steep slopes above SilverRock to Martinez Canyon 19 km south (Map 10). In February, ewe 417 spent time on the steep slopes above the golf courses. No doubt this ewe watched from above as other ewes in the urban group foraged on the golf courses below. Hopefully, a fence should be in place before this ewe, and others, become habituated to the urban environment. Ewe 353 Map 9 s Eve 3F3 • Lambing Ti— Frame Feb 824 215 0 Ev. 352_gdf_mu. e_lo.. ians IJaWral Wa[e.r Sou ces co `01 PCrP La Quinta 0* Cove 0 ° o O O ° O 0 �P' 0 8 Bear (:freek° °j V° o 0 0 0 00 A Tradition SilverRock 00, PGA 00 c 0 .,._West Q�C7si O n 0 ° $$ 0 8 The Quarry 0 0 t O 0 Q O � O o Devil Cahy o ° ° ° ° ° °. 00 0 ° Guadalupe Creek OM. ° °m0000 ° 0 e 8 oV O N 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 3 Kilvrneters +J Southern Santa Rosa Mountains: The SSRM recovery region is approximately 562 km2 with a density of approximately 0.27 sheep per kmz (based on 2010 417 Tradition n p a p 1O ®r_2015 - SilverRock � V � -or 2015 _2016 La Quint • 4• y_2o1s CoVe = ®° �'` PGA o 22-201b West Walar Sources SBS ° • �O O 0 c00 The Quarry Bear Creek ° Devil Canyon 0 • • Guadalupe Creek r Toro Canyon • a � • -M I o' t c ° o 0 c oZo ne $ o Alta Agua Canyon 81 o abundance estimate). In November 2015, 7 GPS (5 ewes and 2 rams) and 5 satellite collars (5 females) were deployed on sheep. No attempt has been made yet to define home range due to the short time frame of data collection. To date, ewe habitat use has been concentrated in a 10 by 10 km2 area that extends from just west of Rattlesnake Canyon to the eastern border of ABDSP (Map 11). The most northern boundary is just below Travertine Palms Canyon and the southern boundary is highway S22. Core use area, following the first few months post -deployment, has been located in an unnamed drainage due east of Smoke Tree Canyon and west of Calcite Mine. This core area has a saddle that allows easy access from the south -facing slopes to the north -facing slopes. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 15 274 vanecito fountains: i ne viva recovery region is approximately 708 km2 with a density of approximately 0.20 sheep per km2 (based on 2010 abundance estimate). It is the 2nd largest of all the recovery regions and is one of the most remote and inaccessible areas of the Peninsular Ranges. Due to inaccessibility, it is one of the least studied regions and only recently have we begun to understand ewe group structure and seasonal movements especially within the Fish Creek Mountains. Presently, there are 4 ewe groups that have been identified (Map 12). The "Lizard Wash" ewe group uses an area of approximately 12 x 7 km2 in the North Pinyon Mountains of the northwestern portion of the recovery region. The northwestern boundary is defined by Highway 78 and the southeastern boundary is Bighorn Canyon. Core use area is centered at Lizard Wash; however, data for several GPS- collared ewes have not yet been obtained. Water sources accessed in summer 2015 were along San Felipe Creek in Sentenac Canyon and at the Blue Spring Guzzler. Narrows 00 a Map 12 vallecito Mountains ��, • ° 0V0° ° Ewe Groups c5e �® • Lizand wash • Sunset Mountain . ° • Sunset .I • • �� io • ° NO • •• •+ $�° r45 G w ° % ° Ocotillo ells 0. o • Split Mountain 'Fish Craek Mountains p7hy ° bo �� Gyp surn_Mine r M®. .. I • oo • o ° t} guzzlers 4ta� Bighorn Canyon hs �� mod• Colo° flephan Tree NawraI VVatersources ° $ - Highway 78 bo 0 000 _ $b° ?" 9�R Whale Peak CP� 'oqB ° Os ✓° June Wash Q ° ° o ° ° ® Split Mou ° Q ° ° p ° ° ° $° p °, W pbo P �. o , 1 0 1.5 3 6 S 12 Ki meters Fish Creek � o Mountains The "Sunset Mountain" ewe group surrounds Sunset Mountain (Map 12). The western boundary is defined roughly by Pinyon Wash and the eastern boundary by Harper Canyon 6 km to the east. The northern boundary abuts Highway 78 through the Narrows while Harper Flats 7 km to the south serves as the southern boundary. Summer water is mainly obtained at the Sunset and Pinyon Wash Guzzlers with less frequent use at the Nolina and Harper Canyon Guzzlers. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 16 275 The "Split Mountain" ewe group has the largest use area of approximately 17 x 11 km (Map 12). The western boundary is around June Wash on the southern slopes of Whale Peak and the eastern boundary is at the dirt road into Split Mountain. The northern boundary is above Elephant Tree in the Vallecito Mountains and the southern boundary is the lower elevations of the Fish Creek Wash drainage. During the summer months, water was obtained at the Whale Peak Guzzler and at various tinajas (rock basins that collect and store rain water) in Fish, Stone, and Lycium Washes. The "Fish Creek" ewe group resides within the Fish Creek Mountains and has used an area of approximately 15 x 9 km thus far (Map 12). The northern boundary is to the east of a large Gypsum Mine operation in Imperial County and the southern boundary is north of Carrizo Wash. Thus far, core use area is in a large north/south running drainage on the eastern side of the Fish Creek Mountains. To date, we have data from only 3 of the 5 GPS-collared ewes and summer locations have yet to be obtained. THREATS TO RECOVERY Section D 1.1-1.4 of the Peninsular Ranges bighorn sheep recovery plan describes a series of interim and long- term actions which, if implemented, would eliminate or significantly reduce threats to population recovery. Actions described in the plan address a broad range of known and potential threats to recovery. These threats (generally described) include but may not be limited to: 1) habitat loss and fragmentation; 2) loss of habitat connectivity; 3) loss of habitat quality due to natural (fire) and human causes (introduction of exotic/toxic vegetation); 4) loss, reduction or diversion of water sources; 4) use of the urban interface; 5) livestock grazing; 6) road and highway crossing; and 7) human activities known or found to be directly or indirectly detrimental to sheep. Because bighorn sheep in the Peninsular Ranges reside in a network of state, federal, private, and tribal government lands which lie adjacent to large human urban populations, reaching recovery goals and assuring long-term protections for sheep will require an understanding of and commitment to eliminating threats within and among recovery regions. Identified threats as described in the Peninsular Ranges recovery plan are detailed below by recovery region. San Jacinto Mountains, and Northern and Central Santa Rosa Mountains - Threats and concerns — habitat loss and fragmentation, urban use, disease, human disturbance, vehicle collisions, and domestic livestock: Urban development within and adjacent to sheep habitat continue to be of concern within these 3 recovery regions. In the SJM recovery region there are several proposed housing developments adjacent to sheep habitat. Currently under construction is the Desert Palisades subdivision on 112 acres within sheep habitat in the Chino Cone area. Connectivity across Chino Canyon is restricted by the Tramway road, fencing, and human activities. In the area surrounding Blaisdell Canyon, domestic sheep and goats that are not properly fenced or are allowed to run loose can potentially spread disease to the wild sheep population. Connectivity between the CSRM and NSRM recovery regions is impeded by Highway 74 and each year sheep are struck and killed by vehicles while attempting to cross the highway (Map NSRM Recovery Region Hwy 3 PBS Road Collisions Highway 74 , .collisions +ea2015 - 4 B 2014 - 3 '>rt' 2013 - 1 2012 - 1 2011 - 1 2010 - 1 2009 - 1 ! 2008 - 2 �'�; •�r: Y 2007 - 2 Sheep Locations t» • 14,, CSRM _. Recovery Region �mF a 13). Improved signage and warning devices may prevent accidents that can potentially harm both sheep and humans. Future increases in the traffic load on this stretch of the highway may eventually cut off any movement between the NSRM and CSRM. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 17 276 Human disturbance in areas identified as lambing and nursery habitat continues to be of concern within these 3 recovery regions. In the CSRM in particular, the West, Urban, and South -A ewe groups' locations overlap in the area just south of La Quinta Cove and thus serve as an important movement corridor between lambing and nursery grounds, foraging habitat, and water sources (Map 14). This vital sheep habitat is also used extensively by recreational users. There are 3 official trails CSRM Sheep Group Overlap --- Map 14 - through this area: Bear ° West Sheep Locations :` ` r L. Urban Sheep Locations �� "i• .,,3 Creek trail, Boo Hoff Trail, o South A Sheep Locations {'¢ CrA ^: s ear Creek Trall � 1 ! � ^ � — 5. T and the Cove to Lake Trail. ____— BnaffTrall '", ti, Baa_ Signs that clearly state that - —•• County Park Trail Cove Ta Lake trail dogs are not allowed are r. s {` M �i k 4 disregarded by the public ' r , especially on the Cove t0 La Quinta Cove Lake Trail. There is an q _ ¢, extensive system of illegal trails (social trails) that are q Lake % often used by mountain bikers and hikers in the area around the Boo Hoff trail. This area has been identified as ewe nursery o� The Quarry," ' habitat. The social trails that extend into steep sheep habitat off the east- , o Y a side of the Cove to Lake, e �" Trail local) referred to as x _ R (locally , off. k the "overlook trail") also - occur in what has been identified as lambing habitat. Because this is particularly important sheep habitat, we recommend that rules on trails be enforced and unauthorized trails eliminated. CSRM rams have been documented foraging on golf courses in La Quinta since 2007; and in 2012, ewes and Iambs began foraging at golf courses as well. Ewes and their Iambs now forage at PGA West, SilverRock, or Tradition on a daily basis. Incidents of sheep walking on the streets and throughout residential neighborhoods in La Quinta continue to increase each year. Sheep use of the urban environment changes their natural foraging patterns and behavior and expose them to a variety of risks such as increased spread of diseases, vehicle strikes, entanglement, drowning, predation, increased parasite loads, and exposure to toxins. Since 2012, 3 rams and 1 Iamb have drowned in the Coachella Canal, 1 ram was rescued from the canal, 1 ram died from oleander poisoning, and 1 ram was struck and killed on Jefferson Avenue. Disease is rapidly spread among sheep that concentrate within the golf course communities. In 2015, Iambs on the golf course were observed with pneumonia and only 11% of these Iambs survived their first year (refer to sections on Respiratory Disease and Lamb Survival and Recruitment for details). Fencing at the urban interface is identified as a site specific recovery action for the Santa Rosa Mountains south of Highway 74 in Section II.D.1.2 of the recovery plan (USFWS 2000). Construction of fencing to exclude bighorn sheep from golf courses and residential areas in La Quinta would be an important step toward preventing urban related mortalities and enhance efforts toward conservation of sheep in the CSRM. For example, the exclusion fence built in Rancho Mirage in 2002 has completely eliminated urban -related bighorn sheep deaths. Other potential actions, such as the capture and removal of sheep from the golf course communities would not be feasible. Ewes teach their Iambs where to obtain food and water and once a pattern of use (home range) is established it is maintained from one cohort to the next. Sheep are capable of traveling great distances over a short period of time and would easily find their way back to their original home range. Furthermore, because disease has been identified within the urban ewe group, removal of these sheep to another area would facilitate the spread of disease to other areas of the range. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 18 277 Southern Santa Rosa Mountains - Threats and concerns — habitat loss and degradation, depleting water sources, human disturbance (off -road vehicles), disease, and predation: Gold mine exploration is taking place within sheep habitat in the Wonderstone Wash area in the eastern portion of this recovery region. Sheep habitat within the boundaries of ABDSP does not guarantee protection due to incursions by off -road vehicles in washes that are presently not patrolled by the State Park. In the past, there have been at least 4 reliable sources of water for sheep in the SSRM: Rattlesnake Springs, Limestone Guzzler, North Palm Wash tinaja, and Natural Rock Tanks tinajas. Recently, some natural springs and tinajas have dried up in the latter portion of the summer. If drought conditions continue these water sources may no longer meet the needs of sheep within this recovery region. A remote camera was placed at Rattlesnake Spring from fall 2011 through summer 2012. No predators, except for an occasional bobcat, were caught on the camera; however, during the late spring and summer sheep were captured on camera in large numbers throughout the day and night. The refill rate of the spring could not keep up with the demand and the spring was often dry by 0900 hours each day. Observations by a CDFW biologist in more accessible areas have demonstrated that sheep with pneumonia will spend increasingly more time near a water source as their disease progresses. This may result in an increased incidence of disease in areas of high sheep concentration. Recently radio -collared sheep within this recovery region and placement of more cameras at springs will help determine whether water enhancement projects may be warranted. Coyote Canyon - Threats and concerns — water source accessibility, disease, predation, and human disturbance: The jeep road from Lower Willows to Middle Willows is closed by ABDSP Superintendent Order from June 1 through September 30 in order to protect the watering rights of bighorn sheep. However, Coyote Creek is a dynamic system and the area traditionally used by sheep to obtain water at Lower Willows above the closure has filled in with dense vegetation making it difficult for sheep to access water. In the past few years, sheep have been accessing water at or below the closure gate where it is more open and escape terrain is closer. Moving the closure gate to just below 2nd crossing may help to ensure that sheep can obtain water in a safe location without human disturbance. Disease in this recovery region continues to be a threat (refer to section on Lamb Survival) and CDFW will continue to monitor for possible increases in disease occurrence. Typically, sheep that live within recovery regions with perennial streams and extensive riparian areas (CoC, NSYM, and CC) have higher predation rates than sheep living in areas without perennial streams. Sick Iambs will often increase the amount of time they spend near water sources which in turn increases their risk of predation. Furthermore, in past years, CDFW has documented on at least 5 occasions females standing guard over their dead Iambs (deaths due to pneumonia) for up to 3 days. In 2 of these cases, it resulted in the adult females being killed by a mountain lion. It is also possible that ravens at the carcass site may key predators to their location: dead Iambs are now removed when found near a ewe. Northern San Ysidro Mountains - Threats and concerns — urban use, vehicle collision, disease, predation, and human disturbance: An increase in urban use by sheep within this recovery region continues to be a concern as sheep become more habituated and increase their use each year at the DeAnza Villas and golf course community. This development poses a threat to the health and survival of sheep in this recovery region due to possible ingestion of poisonous ornamental plants, facilitation of the spread of disease, accidents such as vehicle collisions and drowning in pools or ponds, drinking contaminated water, and increased predation at the urban interface. Presently, CDFW is examining the feasibility of installing barrier fencing along the boundary of ABDSP and DeAnza Villas. Another major threat to sheep within this recovery region is movement across county road 522. One of the most frequently crossed sections of this road is between mile marker 13 and 14.5 with several past sheep deaths documented at a specific point just below mile marker 14. CDFW is examining the feasibility of placing warning lights and signs at locations along stretches of S22 to reduce this risk. In August 2015, most water sources within Borrego-Palm Canyon (BPC) dried up and sheep were forced to rely on the pupfish pond adjacent to the trailhead parking lot. If this trend continues, placement of another water source closer to the slopes and away from the trailhead parking lot may allow sheep to access water without being disturbed while still allowing visitors to access the trailhead parking area. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 19 278 Pneumonia in Iambs continued to take a Y toll on Iamb survival In 2015 (refer to: section on Lamb Survival and r • " Recruitment). As Iambs become sicker they spend a significant amount of time near the creek in BPC. This occurs at the same time park visitation numbers soar within the canyon (Photo 4). The BPC trail is not maintained and visitors often rt ; become lost and end up off -trail`" 3 following the dry creek bed where sheep often congregate. While the sheep In ,. this canyon are habituated, it is not known if constant disturbance in the ' form of visitors approaching and sick Iambs may decrease photographing Y their chances of survival or impede 1tobyTolby movement to and from water sources Photo 4. Visitors to Borrego-Palm Canyon in Anza-Borrego Desert State Park photograph and admire and high quality forage alongside the a ewe (upper left). These visitors all thought that the ewe was curious about the people and looking at them. However, the ewe was looking for her Iamb that was on the slopes behind the crowds and stream. Increasing the number of Park was attempting to find a way past the crowds to reach her Iamb. Docents along known sheep use areas during busy weekends (specifically at the junction of the regular trail and the alternate trail), educating park visitors, posting signs, and regular trail maintenance to keep people on existing trails may help ensure sick Iambs and foraging sheep are not disturbed at this critical time. Southern San Ysidro Mountains - Threats and concerns — vehicle collision, maintaining water sources, disease, and predation: County road S3 between Pinyon Ridge and Yaqui Ridge bisects the SSYM recovery region and Highway 78 at the Narrows serves as a movement corridor between the SSYM and VM recovery regions. Sheep are most often struck and killed on both sections of these roads during the early spring when ewes are moving between the lambing and nursery grounds. Unfortunately, this coincides with an increase in traffic during the peak of visitation to ABDSP and the Ocotillo Wells Off -Road Recreation Park. Reducing and enforcing the speed limit at common crossing locations on county road S3 and through the Narrows on Highway 78 as well as use of warning devices and signage may help reduce sheep deaths. The Tubb Canyon Guzzler which resides on private property has fallen into disrepair and no longer functions. Springs farther up the canyon within ABDSP were accessible for a few years following a fire in 2012 but have since filled in with vegetation. Water depletion, accessibility and regular maintenance of guzzlers within this recovery region needs to be addressed by ABDSP in order to ensure future access to water for sheep. Vallecito Mountains - Threats and concerns- maintaining water sources, habitat loss, human disturbance, and disease: The Fish Creek Mountains (FCM) ewe group resides in the eastern portion of this recovery region which is largely outside the protection of BLM wilderness and wilderness areas within ABDSP and thus vulnerable to habitat loss and fragmentation (Map 12). Presently, there is a gypsum mine (with plans for expansion) at the northern portion of the FCM ewe group home range and off -road vehicle use and target shooting is allowed within BLM land on the eastern edge of this ewe group. For over 30 years, ABDSP has maintained numerous guzzlers within this recovery region and sheep have become dependent upon their use. However, in recent years guzzlers maintenance has been deferred and leaks resulted in several dry guzzlers. In addition, due to drought conditions there has not been enough rain to fill some of the guzzlers. Fortunately, because there are numerous guzzlers, sheep were able to shift their use to functioning guzzlers. Starting in 2015, ABDSP trained volunteers to check the condition of guzzlers; however, a long-term plan and maintenance program/funding needs to be assessed by ABDSP. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 20 279 Carrizo Canyon: - Threats and concerns — vehicle collisions, habitat loss and fragmentation, disease, water accessibility, human disturbance, and domestic livestock: In the past few years there has been an increase in the number of sick Iambs observed in 3 of 4 ewe groups (Tierra Blanca, IKP, and Carrizo). In June of 2015, a dead Iamb was found in Carrizo Canyon and lab results identified Mycoplosma ovipneumoniae (M.ovi) as the likely causative pathogen. CDFW will continue to monitor disease among these ewe groups. Each year, there are several reports of non collared sheep being stuck and killed by vehicles while crossing Interstate 8 (Map 15). In March of 2014, the first collared ewe was struck and killed while crossing the east -bound lanes of 1-8. In 2015, a non -collared ewe and ram were killed in the same general area of the east -bound lanes This section of the Interstate bisects the seasonal movement pathway of both rams and ewes, and as Interstate traffic continues to increase each year, seasonal movement pathways will eventually be cut off. CDFW staff continues to recommend that USFWS and renewable energy project proponents implement vehicle strike hazard reduction PISS Road Kill Map 15 Interstate 8 2015 nr 2014 2012.. .f e West -Bound Lanes '',•'• •: East -Bound �. Lanes a•:,p, f'n' � ',,•�f ��" _ .yw'w��F'°�1�sfry �+ ° r r,: ''�;'7E . sow :.�� YJer Ya fl6Y y � ly � AN C204 .3 '1 i f (funnel and barrier fencing and signage) and habitat improvement measures required to off -set impacts from energy developments on bighorn sheep habitat in the CC recovery region. It is hoped that the required off -set measures can be fulfilled in order to reduce strike hazards and improve habitat values for bighorn sheep. However, elimination of vehicle strike hazards will ultimately require the construction of overpass structures and directional fencing along the 1-8 In-Ko-Pah Gorge corridor. Water availability and access to water is a growing concern. Mountain Spring is an important source of water for sheep in the IKP ewe group. Mountain Spring is on San Diego County Park land and is adjacent to the west -bound lanes of Interstate 8. While vehicle access to the spring is restricted from the Interstate, the spring can be accessed via a jeep trail from the west. In 2015, there were numerous large jeep events held near the spring: this road needs to be gated to restrict public use in order to protect the watering rights of bighorn sheep. There are numerous small ranches only a few miles to the west and recently a lost horse has been seen using the spring. While horses are not known to spread disease to wild sheep, the presence of a horse indicates property owners may not be properly fencing their livestock. If domestic goats or sheep were to become loose they could potentially spread disease to this ewe group. Farther north, sheep within the Tierra Blanca ewe group are dependent on the water sources at Agua Caliente County Park (ACCP) and Canebrake Canyon. The campground at ACCP is closed to the public during the summer which allows sheep free access to the multiple springs within the campground. Campground staff should attempt to minimize any construction activities during this time. Oleander bushes (Nerium oleander) throughout the campground were removed in 2013; however, the County needs to regularly check and remove any regrowth of oleander within the campground in order to prevent sheep deaths due to oleander poisoning. The water sources along Canebrake Canyon reside on private property. The Canyon is being choked by tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) which may eventually prevent access to water and out -compete native plant species that are an important source of forage for sheep during the summer and fall months. Tamarisk continues to be a problem at some water sources (Jacumba Jim and Black Water) within Carrizo Canyon as well. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 21 280 Since 2009, GPS data have identified areas within the CC recovery region that are vital sheep habitat and movement corridors (Map 16). Sheep within these ewe groups face increasing challenges posed by renewable energy developments, access road construction and maintenance related to border security, and human disturbance. Presently, target shooting is allowed on BLM land within the 1-8 Island and is accessed via the Mountain Springs exit; furthermore, jeep activities in Devils Canyon may restrict free movement of sheep to and from their Iamb rearing habitat within the Island. Border security activity throughout the recovery region is intensive with regular vehicle patrols, foot patrols, and helicopter flights both night and day within Iamb rearing habitat and movement corridors in designated wilderness areas. It is not currently known to what extent these activities may alter, discourage, or restrict sheep movement and use of important resources. There have been several instances, documented by the CDFW biologist, when low flying border security and military helicopters have disrupted normal sheep activities. Border Patrol activities have created a network of roads within the bounds of wilderness areas that also allows unauthorized vehicle access to the general publics. The following areas are considered important sheep movement corridors and habitat within the border region that have been impacted by unauthorized roads: Bow Willow Canyon, Rockhouse Canyon, Sweeney Canyon, Jojoba Wash, the Volcanic Hills, Devils Canyon, the jeep road to Mountain Spring, Myer Valley access from east -bound Interstate 8, Davies Canyon and Valley, the eastern Jacumba Mountains with access to canyons at Coyote Roads number one and two, and Pinto Wash. The Jacumba ewe group is dependent on resources both within the US and Mexico. A fence along the US -Mexico border would rohibit movement to United states Mexico P and use of prelambing and Iamb rearing habitat and summer water sources. Furthermore, Iamb rearing habitat in the east Jacumba Mountains is not within USFWS designated critical sheep habitat (Map 16) and any further energy projects development within or adjacent to the these areas combined with disturbance by border security activities may have significant adverse effects on this ewe group. FUTURE ACTIONS Program activities for 2016 include monitoring radio -collared sheep to detect and investigate mortalities, obtain ground observations to assess group composition, health and disease, lamb:ewe and yearling:ewe ratios, collecting location and movement data, and capture and radio -collaring. A capture is planned for fall 2016 to increase the number of radio - collars in the CC and NSYM recovery regions in order to assure a minimum of 25% marked sheep in all recovery regions prior to a rangewide helicopter survey. Following the fall capture, a rangewide population survey will be conducted to generate an abundance estimate. Additionally, CDFW will update rangewide population structure, distribution, and movement based on GPS data collection. CDFW personnel involved in peninsular sheep recovery will establish department program activities for the next three year period (2017-2020) and will coordinate with federal, state, local and NGO recovery program partners on recovery actions. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 22 281 00 �& _ � 5 A >� AriU414 oto by Jeff Youn', Special Thanks to Jeff Young for allowing us to use his photographs in this report CITATIONS y d" Besser, T.E., Cassirer, E.F., Potter, K.A., VanderSchalie, J., Fischer, A., et al. 2008. Association of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae infection with population -limiting respiratory disease in free -ranging Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis canadensis). Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 46, 423-430. Besser, T.E., Highland, M., Baker, K., Cassirer, E.F., Anderson, N.J., Ramsey, J.M., Mansfield, K.M., Bruning, D., Wolff, P., Smith, J.B. & Jenks, J.A. 2012. Causes of pneumonia epizootics among bighorn sheep, western United States, 2008- 2010. Buchalski, M.R., Navarro, A. Y., Boyce, W. M., Vickers, T.W., & Tobler, M.W., et al. 2015. Genetic population structure of Peninsular bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni) indicates substantial gene flow across US —Mexico border. Biological Conservation 184: 218-228. Cassirer, E. F., & Sinclair, A. R. E. 2007. Dynamics of pneumonia in a bighorn sheep metapopulation. Journal of Wildlife Management, 71(4):1080-1088. Cassirer E. F., Plowright, R. K., Manlove, K. R., Cross, P. C., Dobson, A. P., et al. 2013. Spatio-temporal dynamics of pneumonia in bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis). Journal of Animal Ecology 82:518-528. Colby, J., & Botta, R. 2012. CDFW 2012 Peninsular bighorn sheep annual report and recovery program review 1993 — 2012. Available on-line at www.wildlife.ca.gov Colby, J. & Botta, R. 2014. CDFW 2014 Peninsular bighorn sheep annual report. Available on-line at www.wildlife.ca. DeForge, J. R. & Scott, J. E. 1982. Ecological investigations into high Iamb mortality. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 26:65-76 Fredrickson, R., & Mills, L. S. 2009. Methods for evaluation of risks and benefits of population augmentation options to facilitate recovery of bighorn sheep in the Peninsular Ranges, California. Unpublished report produced for CDFW. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 23 282 Hobbs, N. T., & Miller, M. 1991. Interactions between pathogens and hosts: simulations of Pasteurellosis epizootics in bighorn sheep populations. Pages 997-1007 in R. H. Barrett, editor. Wildlife 2001: populations. Elsevier Applied Science, New York. Horn, P. J. & Vaughan, J. G. 1983. Seed glucosinolates of 14 wild Brassica species. Phytochemistry 22(2): 465-470. Lawrence, P.K., Shanthalingam, S., Dassanayake, R.P, Subramanian, R., Herndon, C.N., et al. 2010. Transmission of Mannheimia haemolytica from Domestic Sheep (Ovis aries) to Bighorn Sheep (Ovis canadensis): Unequivocal Demonstration with Green Fluorescent Protein -Tagged Organisms. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 46(3): 706-717. Plowright, R. K., Manlove, K., Cassirer, E. F., Cross, C., Besser, T. E., & Hudson, P. J. 2013. Use of Exposure History to Identify Patterns of Immunity to Pneumonia in Bighorn Sheep (Ovis canadensis). PLoS ONE 8(4): e61919. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061919 Rubin, E. S., Boyce, W. M., & Caswell -Chen, E. P. 2002. Modeling demographic processes in an endangered population of bighorn sheep. Journal of Wildlife Management 66:796-810. Rudolph, K. M., Hunter, D. L., Rimler, R. B., Cassirer, E. F., Foreyt, W. J., et al. 2007. Microorganisms associated with a bighorn sheep pneumonia epizootic in Hells Canyon, USA. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 38:548-558. Scott, P. R. 2007. Other Nervous Diseases. Pages 259-261 in I.D. Aitken editor. Diseases of Sheep Fourth Edition. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK. Singer, F. J., Williams, E. S., Miller, M. W., & Zeigenfuss, L. C. 2000. Population growth, fecundity, and survivorship in recovering populations of bighorn sheep. Restoration Ecology 8:75-84. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2000. Recovery plan for bighorn sheep in the Peninsular Ranges, California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR. xv+251 pp. Weaver, R. A. 1975. Status of the bighorn sheep in California. In: The wild sheep in modern North America. J.B. Trefethen, ed. Boone and Crockett Club. Alexandria, Virginia. Pp. 58-64. Wehausen, J. D., Kelley, S. T., & Ramey II, R. R. 2011. Domestic sheep, bighorn sheep, and respiratory disease: a review of the experimental evidence. California Fish and Game 97(1):7-24. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 24 283 284 Exhibit 2: Bighorn Institute Monthly Updates February to October 2016 285 February 2016 I bighoaninstitute J i o�-n Jens tine HOME ABOUT US PROJECTS WAYS YOU CAN HELP Drarl��e February 2o16 Lambing Update Lambing is in full swing in the wild and we have now documented 30 Iambs so far in our study area from Palm Springs to La Quinta. There are still many other ewes that should give birth in the coming weeks so we're in the field frequently hoping we don't miss any collared ewes' Iambs. Lambing season extends from January through June for Peninsular bighorn with the peak between February and April. Recent rain has the mountains greening up beautifully now providing amazing vegetation for the sheep. It's an exciting, but busy season and we look forward to documenting many more Iambs this year! �� XTir;{�vrralrr.sirPute ^. We're thrilled to announce that our website has been completely redesigned and should make for a much better experience for each visitor! It has in-depth information about bighorn sheep, beautiful bighorn °^~ F photos, current news and connects easily to our Facebook account. We've got some exciting new projects in the works this year, including the Naturalist citizen science project, and member only hikes so check out our website from time to time as it will be updated frequently. Follow Us 0 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O2/29/February-2016-The-Monthly-Bighom-Report[11/5/2016 4:28:25 PM] 4:. February 2016 I bighorninstitute La Quinta Bighorn Barrier Meeting On March 10, 2016, at 7:00 pm, there will be a Public Scoping meeting at the La Quinta City Hall Council Chambers to discuss the Bighorn Barrier Project in La Quinta. This project addresses the urban issues bighorn in La Quinta face, such as utilizing the golf courses; A - as an artificial source of food and water. This meeting is open to the public and is an opportunity for you to ask questions, voice your concerns and comment relative to the bighorn barrier (i.e., fence) project. Bighorn rams have been coming down to the La Quinta golf courses since 2007 and ewes and Iambs since 2012. Seven bighorn sheep are known to have died as a direct result of coming down to the La Quinta urban areas since 2012: 4 sheep have drowned in the canal (including 1 Iamb), 1 ram ate poisonous oleander, 1 ram was hit and killed by a car on Jefferson, and 1 Iamb was deathly ill on the golf course and was euthanized. We feel a fence is necessary to keep bighorn sheep safe and out of the urban areas of La Quinta. For more information about the Bighorn Barrier Project and this meeting, visit http://www.cvmshcp.org. �'-. lii�7nt.rrr lrrrl illrtr* - NEW Citizen Science program! H.— you u K91hom shekp7 We warn 1e 0 1,M] .d V 00 [nn help uc —p — e11he—dangere. —in— bl,- sheep in the Ceathello Valley by for tlr� yaur s7,rhHnes! I.D 104 the !R.a[_in: N app W"Q.* �Hxlran30.Crd 1. ilrn o Itt [hls free ttcpum nr Ix� fn wish an existim¢ F—b.4 Twltxtr ifthy;6pe¢4 et Veh. —brut 3. Se-h pr"— &jili7 Wl .h Int A—" pidje417 CIE— your *-p tlrhtinrc Inc lu&kd ph— dtl4ETHtlk w. xill weeE m.wre tna [tes»M,attMl males[It ra=.rswr.. the endryrrsd?sn�ncApr p�ora rhrral THAN,-.. YOU :llaturallsl IitfdlUidliS[.t7r_y New Citizen Science Project Have you seen bighorn sheep here in the valley? If so, we want to know about it! You can be a Citizen Scientist by providing us with your bighorn sightings. This information helps us to keep track of the wild herd since most of them are unmarked. Your sightings will help us determine the population size and demography, where they are, etc. We have started a Bighorn Institute project with iNaturalist and you can easily log your sheep sightings via the iNaturalist app or on iNatural ist.org. Signing up for an account is free or you can log in with an existing Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, Google or Yahoo account. For more information, visit our Citizen Science page on our website. New Member Only Bighorn Hike On Thursday March 10th at 8:00 am, Bighorn Institute will hold its inaugural 287 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O2/29/February-2016-The-Monthly-Bighom-Report[11/5/2016 4:28:25 PM] February 2016 I bighominstitute Member Only Bighorn Hike! One of Bighorn Institute's biologists will take you on a local hiking trail in sheep habitat to look for the endangered Peninsular bighorn sheep. You will learn all about the local bighorn and with a bighorn biologist as your guide, hopefully see sheep! Membership starts at just $25/year and is tax-deductible. Space is limited, no dogs, and you must RSVP for this first come first served hike. To sign up or for more information, please call us at 760-346-7334. 0 Comments Add a comment... F1 Facebook Comments Plugin Upcoming Presentation: Rancho Mirage Library On March 31st at 2:00 pm, Bighorn Institute will give a presentation at the Rancho Mirage Public Library titled "Bighorn Sheep in the Coachella Valley and Beyond." This presentation is open to the public and we hope you will attend. sort by oldest I http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O2/29/February-2016-The-Monthly-Bighom-Report[11/5/2016 4:28:25 PM] March 2016 1 bighorninstitute ighorn Institute HOME ABOUT US PROJECTS WAYS YOU CAN HELP Drarlaj* March 2o16 Wildflower Festival On March 5th, Bighorn Institute participated in the annual Wildflower Festival at the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Visitor Center. The wildflowers were wonderful and it was another beautiful day in paradise! The festival was well attended and was a great venue for Bighorn Institute to inform folks about the endangered Peninsular bighorn sheep and our research and conservation efforts for the species. Thanks to all who stopped by to share your sheep sightings and stories! Rancho Mirage Library Presentation We will give a presentation on Thursday March 31st at 2:00pm at the Rancho Mirage Library on bighorn sheep in the Coachella Valley and beyond. We hope you will join us! Member Only Bighorn Hike On Thursday March 10th, Bighorn Institute held its inaugural Member Only Bighorn Hike, which was a great success! Bighorn Institute's biologists took a small group on a local hiking trail in La Quinta to look for bighorn sheep. We had great success as right away we spotted a group of ewes and Iambs from our meeting spot! However, they were very far away and was difficult to Follow Us 0 1► : • http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/03/31/March-2016-The-Monthly-Bighorn-Report[11/5/2016 4:29:14 PM] March 2016 1 bighorninstitute see, even with a spotting scope so we hit the trail. Around halfway through the hike, fs: we found a group of rams that were a bit K closer and quite viewable. Everyone thoroughly enjoyed themselves since we were successful seeing sheep and had the added bonus of beautiful wildflowers. Our next Member Only Bighorn Hike will be Thursday April 14th at 8:OOam. We'd love to have you join us. Membership starts at just $25/year and is tax-deductible. Space is limited, no dogs, and you must RSVP for this first come first served hike. To sign up or for more information, please call us at 760- 346-7334 or email us at bi@bighorninstitute.org. Lambing is in Full Swing Lambing continues in the wild and we have now documented over 40 Iambs so far in our study area from Palm Springs to La Quinta. They range from just a week old to nearly 3 months old as many were born in January. There are still a number of ewes that should give birth in the coming weeks so we're in the field daily looking for new animals. Lambing season can run through June for Peninsular bighorn with the peak between February and April. Another Bighorn Falls into Canal The Coachella Canal runs through SilverRock and PGA West golf courses in La Quinta and in late March, we received a report that a bighorn fell into the canal. Thankfully, it was able to get out on its own. Since August 2012, we know of 7 rams that have fallen into this canal; 4 have drowned. We continue to reiterate the need for a fence to keep the bighorn off of these golf courses and in their natural habitat. Bighorn in Dead Indian Canyon In late March, we observed a group of 14 bighorn sheep, including several Iambs, up high in Dead Indian Canyon. The Art Smith trail begins in this canyon and many hikers KIMI http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/03/31/March-2016-The-Monthly-Bighorn-Report[11/5/2016 4:29:14 PM] March 2016 1 bighorninstitute were taking advantage of the beautiful weather to go for a hike. We had a spotting scope set up and were showing people the sheep and it turned out to be a wonderful educational opportunity. Dead Indian and v _ Carrizo Canyons are closed from January — June for lambing season as well as Jul September for the hot season to protect bighorn water sources. We got to see first-hand how these closures are important to the sheep while they rear their Iambs. They need areas of low disturbance to successfully raise their young and they were up in the steep escape terrain where they can better avoid predators. Of course, the sheep kept an eye on us as well, but we were far away and posed no threat. If you hike the Art Smith trail, keep a lookout for bighorn sheep! If you see some, give us a call 760-346-7334. Or, log your sheep sighting into Bighorn Institute's citizen science project in Naturalist; it's free and easy just visit our website for details www.bighorninstitute.org. 0 WIIts o Sort by oldest . Add a comment... F Facebook Comments Plugin 291 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/03/31/March-2016-The-Monthly-Bighorn-Report[11/5/2016 4:29:14 PM] April 2016 I bighorninstitute Bighorn Institute HOME ABOUT US PROJECTS WAYS YOU CAN HELP Donate April 2 o16 Bighorn Released into the Wild In early April, Bighorn Institute released an adult ewe from its captive herd into the northern Santa Rosa Mountains. Prior to her release, this ewe was health tested and�lx�; fitted with a radio- collar and - eartag. The A, 1 capture and release went well and the ewe seems to be adjusting to her new environment. She has been seen with other sheep and looks great (good body condition, alert, etc.) We have now released 127 bighorn sheep into the wild over the years and this ewe is the 100th bighorn born in the captive herd that was released into the wild. This released ewe must survive in the wild for at least 4 months to be considered a successful release so we will continue to track her daily, but are certainly pleased with her progress so far. Bighorn Presentations We gave two presentations in the past month that were welcome opportunities for some bighorn education. In late March, we spoke at the Rancho Mirage Library on bighorn sheep in the Coachella Valley and beyond. In early April, we gave a presentation to the Coachella Valley Hiking Club at the Palm Desert Library. The presentations were well attended and there were very informative question/answer sessions following each talk. If you would Follow Us 0 292 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O5/O2/April-2016-The-Monthly-Bighom-Report[11/5/2016 4:27:03 PM] April 2016 I bighorninstitute like us to give a bighorn presentation, please give us a call at (760) 346-7334 or email us at bi@bighorninstitute.org. Bighorn Hikes for Members On Thursday April 14th, Bighorn Institute took its monthly Bighorn Hike for Members in Palm Desert. The weather was beautiful and there were still a few wildflowers to enjoy as we glassed for bighorn sheep. Our next Bighorn Hike for Members will be Friday May 20th at 8:OOam and we'd love to have you join us. Membership starts at just $25/year and is completely tax-deductible. Space is limited, no dogs, and you must RSVP for this first come first served hike. To sign up or for more information, please call us at 760-346-7334 or email us at bi@bighorninstitute.org. Lambs in the Wild New Iambs have been born since our last 5_ report and we have now documented around 50 Iambs born in our study area from Palm Springs to La Quinta. They are ,:. growing quickly and many of the older Iambs +, (3-4 months old) have noticeable horn w growth. There has been abundant available vegetation, thanks to the January rain, so field conditions are quite favorable for now. �. There are already a number of sick Iambs on the golf courses of La Quinta, which is expected as they graze in urban areas in unusually large groups where disease can spread easily. That said, the Iambs in the natural habitat look good so far, but we will continue to monitor the sheep because we expect all ewes to give birth, but what's critical is how many Iambs survive to adulthood. 293 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O5/O2/April-2016-The-Monthly-Bighom-Report[11/5/2016 4:27:03 PM] April 2016 I bighorninstitute Citizen Science - You Can Help! Have you seen bighorn sheep while out hiking? If so, we'd like to know about it. We have a new project on the Naturalist app where we're getting the community involved in logging Peninsular desert bighorn sightings. This information helps us to keep track of the local herds as well as helps us to determine the number of bighorn, sex ratios, etc. It's free, it's easy and we hope you'll join Bighorn Institute's Naturalist project and help with our conservation efforts. Please click on the photo for details. Other Wildlife a M 0 0 0 Comments Ej Facebook Comments Plugin �e u4'�] rvfw Cll3ien 5€ienee program) l M1slparr*r.rMp wry e�drryera, hrs.wlw Ykhrrx.lwxe4, oa aa.n.0 v.o.rey u� w�,yrx.,.r —Mu L— WgF,. rwnr... nwr . wcgr wnowaounw< t seara�pale. x.tep.n ryxern wixwp. p�q.A M��, ..�tiwa.,r�r�w,x•r�,r�p,p,�.� x.ma ower..enrx. ba wax e..,n..�.r.wvn Y.... To¢rnat we,Yav:vseewa,a ae+*+m+rrx,rm.mNeak .=..r ka�,.xeeremxeRd ronwr.r w,ewe.�.pi iNANK Y9V! LNaturalist-u It's been an active year for snakes already and we've seen a number of snakes on our property including a Southwest Speckled Rattlesnake (Crotalus mitchellii pyrrhus) and a Red Racer (Coluber flagellum piceus). The Institute is on 300 acres of open desert with many native species of plants and animals on site. While bighorn sheep are our focus and passion, we have a deep appreciation for all that lives in the desert as each species plays a unique role in this beautiful ecosystem we call home. Sort by oldest http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O5/O2/April-2016-The-Monthly-Bighom-Report[11/5/2016 4:27:03 PM] April 2016 1 bighominstitute 295 http://www.bighominstiitate.org/single-post/2Ol6/05/02/April-2016-The-Monthly-Bighom-Report[11/5/2016 4:27:03 PM] May 2016 I bighominstitute Bighorn Institute HOME ABOUT US PROJECTS WAYS YOU CAN HELP Dom* May 2o16 5 Lambs Die in Two Weeks May saw significant loss as five young endangered Peninsular bighorn Iambs died on two golf resorts in La Quinta (PGA West and SilverRock). These Iambs died within a two week period and were showing signs of upper respiratory infection (coughing, nasal discharge, droopy ears and significant weight loss). This is the second year in a row that Iambs utilizing the golf courses in Lail-- Quinta have become sick and many died. Last year, only 2 of 10 Iambs using the courses survived and so far, we know that 5 of 15 Iambs have died this year around the golf courses. We expect more Iambs to die in the coming weeks. The sheep on these golf courses browse in abnormally large groups so when one animal is sick, disease can spread like wildfire. As long as there is no barrier to keep the sheep out of these urban areas, we anticipate this trend will continue. Twelve bighorn sheep, that we know of, have now died in and around the La Quinta golf courses, since 2012. Four have drowned in the Coachella Canal, one ate oleander, one was hit by a car and six were sick and died. In 2014, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Wildlife wrote a joint letter requiring a barrier (i.e., a fence) to be built within 2 years around these La Quinta golf courses, but the authorities are still "studying" the issue. The 2 year deadline was February 28, 2016, and already 5 Iambs have died since that expiration date. We have received much feedback from the recent news casts and newspaper articles about the Iamb deaths and people keep asking us what can be done. Our best advice is to contact the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, CA Department of Fish & Wildlife, City of La Quinta and CVAG and ask why this Follow Us 0 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/05/31/May-2016[11/5/2016 4:26:13 PM] May 2016 I bighominstitute is not being enforced. Sheep in the Streets As if five Iambs dying wasn't ° enough stress in ' La Quinta, there _ were a few days that numerous sheep strayed into the streets, especially around SilverRock 4 Resort. In late ID May, 2 yearling ewes wandered ,r a along Avenue 52 nearly 3 miles - - from the nearest mountains. - _ Luckily, concerned motorists got behind the ewes and slowly drove behind them as they made it back to SilverRock and headed toward the hills. The next day, close to 30 sheep, ewes, Iambs and rams, crossed the 4 lanes of Avenue 52 to eat citrus. They ventured out along the Jefferson circle later in the day. These incidents pose serious human safety issues as well as bighorn safety issues. Fencing along the golf courses would prevent bighorn from straying in the streets and protect us all. I_IT, [j "111-07m:nI On Friday May 20th, Bighorn Institute held its monthly Member Hike, which was a great success! Bighorn Institute's biologists took a small group on a hiking trail in Oswit (Eagle) Canyon in Palm Springs to look for bighorn sheep. We were able to track a 297 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/05/31/May-2016[11/5/2016 4:26:13 PM] May 2016 I bighominstitute radio -collared ewe and found a group of sheep, which of course was the highlight of the hike! We will continue our member hikes this summer; please contact us if you're interested in an early morning hike to look for sheep 760-346-7334 or email us at bi@bighorninstitute.org. Membership starts at just $25/year and is tax-deductible. Space is limited, no dogs. Update on Released Ewe In early April, we released an adult ewe from Bighorn Institute's captive herd into the northern Santa Rosa Mountains. She continues to do well and has now been in the wild for two months. She must survive in the wild for at least 4 months to be considered a successful release. We are thrilled to see her adapting so well to her new environment and will continue to track her daily. W http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/05/31/May-2016[11/5/2016 4:26:13 PM] May 2016 I bighominstitute Log Your Sheep Sightings! We want to know where you're seeing sheep! We've started a citizen science project on Naturalist where hikers can log their sheep sightings with Bighorn Institute. This helps us keep track of the local herds and also gives others an idea where the sheep are. There's been a group of sheep near the Art Smith Trail recently as well as around the South Lykken Trail. We've seen postings on Facebook, but hope folks will join us in this project! Click on the photo for details. F r f 0 Comments x _- I3igJry3rrr luarir:rrrr. NEW Citizen Science program! ............................................................................................. "ova you i<OR hgh000 shcept Wo Wont tok- awut nr W011 an help �s keop vuk ui mrenaarg¢rea Peninsular o�nom snnpin the Couh6lla Val"ty rggglnf your ilgntings I 1. Download shr INa-.aliu app ar Mg unto iMorural l—V i. 5ign up rar this r—..— or IbJ In MAt an ex loini r®[cb. ft Tyllttur• slltRr. 6VOjIA O MUN449CVht 1. S,—h pmJretxB op..Ilgh.. Instltolc'� projoot A. loin glghom Ins[I[rzte's pmpn Ly clicking nn ^Joii thk pa j—' supper right eo ) 5. A0 ow—iom -!og your dawrt bighorn sheop sightings W ftd ngphpt. TQPVHkA• we wa1—k kow'artl tlor rA moray of thb maJc�t k - w1.y Icon•the endangered peninsularhlgi—sheep! THANKYOUI sN�raii� ihlaturaiist.org Sort by Oldest - http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/05/31/May-2016[11/5/2016 4:26:13 PM] We May 2016 1 bighominstitute Add a comment... Ll Facebook Comments Plugin 300 http://www.bighominstiitate.org/single-post/2016/05/31/May-2Ot6[11/5/2016 4:26:13 PM] June 2016 I bighominstitute Bighorn Institute HOME ABOUT US PROJECTS WAYS YOU CAN HELP Dtartate June 2016 Radio Interview Earlier this month, Dr. Lori Kirshner of Animals Today Radio interviewed Bighorn Institute biologist, Aimee Byard, regarding the urban -bighorn issues in La Quinta. Rams have been coming down to the La Quinta golf courses since 2007, and ewes and Iambs since 2012. We know at least 12 bighorn sheep have died since 2012 from coming down to these urban areas to utilize artificial sources of food and water. In fact, in May, five Iambs died on the La Quinta golf courses during a two week period. The Institute has been outspoken about the need for a fence to keep the bighorn back in their natural habitat away from the perils of the urban area. Click on the photo to listen to the interview. Lambing Comes to a Close Lambing season for Peninsular bighorn sheep extends from January to June so this year's crop has arrived. Many Iambs were born this year, as often is the case, but survival is the measure of success. Summer is challenging for all of us here in the desert and the sheep are no exception, Follow Us 0 301 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/06/30/June-2016[l l/5/2016 4:25:15 PM] June 2016 I bighominstitute however, desert bighorn have many adaptations to thrive in this dry, harsh environment. If a Iamb can make it through its first summer, it has a good chance of living to adulthood and hopefully thriving for years. We documented approximately 65 Iambs born in our study area from Palm Springs to La Quinta. The Iambs range from 2-5 months of age and many have substantial horn growth. Lambs are weaned around 5 months of age, but will stay with their mother for the first year of life. Vital home range information is passed down to Iambs during this time so they learn where to go for food, water and shelter. The Iambs in the northern Santa Rosa and San Jacinto's look good, but the ones utilizing the golf courses in La Quinta have been sick and may not make it. In fact, five Iambs died on La Quinta golf courses just this year. We continue to watch that herd closely. Water Source Cleanup In mid -June, we cleared out the overgrown, invasive vegetation surrounding one of the man-made water sources in the northern Santa Rosa Mountains. Overgrown vegetation can block the bighorn's vision as they come in to drink, providing an ambush opportunity for predators. This is an important time of year to ensure water sources are full and clear with the temperatures rising. Bighorn sheep can go months without drinking water during the winter as they are adapted to utilize moisture from their diet of desert dwelling plants. During the summer, desert bighorn sheep can still go 3 days without drinking in temperatures over 100 degrees but will usually drink daily if water is available. There are no longer reliable, year-round natural water sources in the northern Santa Rosa Mountains, which makes these man-made water sources a necessity. The vegetation was removed by hand, which is a painstaking process in the heat, but it's worth it knowing it's helping the safety of the sheep. In fact, a group of 17 ewes and Iambs came down to drink shortly after the vegetation was 302 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/06/30/June-2016[l l/5/2016 4:25:15 PM] June 2016 I bighominstitute cleared. Released Ewe Adapting Well It's been three months since we released an adult ewe from our captive herd into the northern Santa Rosa Mountains and we are pleased to report that she looks good and is adapting well to her surroundings. We monitor her daily and observe her weekly. She has a penchant for being on top of the mountain, which puts us through our paces in this heat, but clearly, that's where she feels safest, so no complaints. We're just glad she's doing so well. Recent article: Keeping desert bighorn sheep safe from urban threats (click photo for story) 0 MAWS 0 Sort by Oldest http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/06/30/June-2016[i l/5/2016 4:25:15 PM] 303 June 2016 1 bighominstitute Add a comment... Ll Facebook Comments Plugin 304 http://www.bighominstiitate.org/single-post/2016/06/30/June-2Ot6[11/5/2016 4:25:15 PM] Jtdy 2016 1 bighominstitute Bighorn Institute HOME ABOUT US WAYS YOU CAN HELP Donal* July 2o16 Research Projects Newsletter Articles Follow Us Monthly Updates Citizen Science Yearling Ewe in the Streets Community Activities On July 22nd, Bighorn Institute received a call from the police reporting a female bighorn on the streets of La Quinta on Jefferson Street adjacent to SilverRock golf resort. Institute biologists responded to the call and found a yearling ewe farther north at Avenue 49. With help from 4 Indio w police officers we made several attempts to haze the ewe back to the mountains, but the ewe was likely disoriented and determined to continue northeast away from the hills. With the extreme heat, we ended our efforts as the ewe was getting hot and was in Indian Palms Country Club in Indio, about 4 miles away from the nearest mountain. This is the farthest we have reported a bighorn sheep from the mountains in this range. Fortunately, that evening, the yearling ewe made her way back to the mountains as we had hoped. This was a dangerous situation for all involved and could have ended very differently. This yearling ewe utilizes the La Quinta golf course areas daily and is habituated, which is why she did not respond to hazing efforts like a wild bighorn. Her unnatural behavior significantly complicated the situation. This was the 3rd incident of sheep running the streets of La Quinta around SilverRock in a 3 day period and the police were called to all 3 events. We want to thank the La Quinta and Indio Police Departments for their much - needed assistance. A fence around SilverRock is needed to keep the sheep off of the busy streets adjacent to the golf course and keep motorists safe from a bighorn collision. orn 305 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/08/03/July-2016[11/5/2016 4:30:27 PM] July 2016 1 bighominstitute Rut Returns It's that time of year again when - } rams come out of a� the backcountry �* _ V, Y in search of ewes to breed. Since there is only 1 functioning radio - collared ram in our 3 study herds ' from Palm Springs to La Quinta, we see rams Ile �.yWINk _ s` v opportunistically when they are with the collared ewes or we happen upon them while hiking. It's an exciting time of year watching rams rut as they battle for breeding rights. The rut has just recently begun and typically extends from July — November for Peninsular bighorn sheep. We look forward to seeing rams regularly the rest of the year, which helps us to determine the current population levels. Sheep Attracted Near Road In Palm Springs, there is a water leak just feet away from Tramway Road in Chino Canyon. The water pipes appear to feed down to the Desert Palisades project, but the water leaks out of the pipes or pumping station and a pool of water has collected. This standing water is attracting bighorn sheep to drink a mere 20 meters away from busy Tramway Road. We first noticed this water leak in November 2015 and notified the wildlife agencies, but as of yet, nothing has been done to rectify the situation. We have received calls from concerned motorists as this water leak poses serious safety issues for both sheep and drivers. Please drive carefully on Tramway Road and let us know if you see sheep 760-346-7334. 306 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/08/03/July-2016[11/5/2016 4:30:27 PM] July 2016 1 bighominstitute GPS Collars GPS (Global Positioning System) radio- • collars are great in that they collect accurate locations on bighorn sheep - without any effort or interference from humans, but they certainly have their limitations and all brands are not created equally. GPS collars don't tell you how the animal is doing health -wise (are they in good condition), reproduction data (whether or not a ewe had a Iamb, its sex, and survival status), the population dynamics of the herd (age and sex of the population), etc. Along with these shortcomings, this month, we had 2 GPS collars fail in the same week: a ewe's collar went into mortality mode and a ram's collar quit beaconing. These collars were just put on 8 months ago and should have lasted several years. The ewe's collar that is stuck on mortality mode means that it is more difficult to determine when/if she actually dies and battery life will decrease. The ram's collar just quit beaconing, which means we can no longer track him and his collar is no longer collecting locations. We've come a long way in monitoring wildlife, but nothing beats "boots on the ground" and being out there physically observing bighorn as we do. It's arduous work, especially in summer, but worth the effort when you're helping with the recovery of an endangered species like the Peninsular bighorn. 0 M a 0 0 Comments Sort by oldest Add a comment... Ej Facebook Comments Plugin http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/08/03/July-2016[11/5/2016 4:30:27 PM] July 2016 1 bighorninstitute 308 http://www.bighominstiitate.org/single-post/2016/08/03/July-2016[11/5/2016 4:30:27 PM] August 2016 I bighorninstitute Bighorn Institute HOME ABOUT US PROJECTS WAYS YOU CAN HELP Dom* August 2o16 Released Ewe a Success! ;, a a We are thrilled to sp, -" 4 - ,�.�. report that the ewe" �- we released in early April is finally considered a success since she siAY � ;y has been in the wild for at least 4 months! Bighorn '.a Institute has now released 127 bighorn sheep into,, the wild since sir - 1985, which has kept 2 local herds ., from disappearing. We r' have worked hard to see this ewe at ' J � � least once a week��+t ' post -release and•_ she has acclimated well to her new environment. She was recently seen with other sheep, including rams. We are hopeful that she will mate successfully this year and contribute to recovery with her offspring. The Rut is Underway Since mid to late - July, rams have been making their way out of the backcountry and are joining up with ewe groups. Follow Us 0 309 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/08/31/August-2016[11/5/2016 4:31:16 PM] August 2016 I bighorninstitute Peninsular bighorn xyu;'f� rams can weigh 2 200 pounds but may lose as much as 25% of their *•� - body weight traveling miles during the rut searching for ewes to breed. The rut, or breeding season, will continue through November and is certainly an exciting time of year. Rams have horn clashing contests to win breeding rights since dominant rams do most of the breeding. Bighorn sheep are polygamous so one ram will breed multiple ewes. While it's a thrill to watch the rams in all their glory, the true excitement of the season is the hope for new life the following spring. Rams Stuck in Morongo Mud Around the middle of August, Bighorn Institute received reports of three different yearling rams stuck in a mud hole in Big Morongo Preserve on three separate occasions. The rams appeared to have fallen into the mud as they attempted to drink from a small pool of water in a large mud hole. Thanks to concerned Morongo Preserve staff each bighorn was freed from the mud safely. This was a unique situation in which young rams made some bad decisions. They were likely away from the rest of the adults trying to take advantage of a risky water source. Hopefully, the stress they endured will prevent them from repeating this mistake. Meanwhile, Morongo staff is working with Bureau of Land Management to see about the possibility of a guzzler near the base of the mountain. We're glad there was a happy 310 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/08/31/August-2016[I 1/5/2016 4:31:16 PM] August 2016 I bighorninstitute ending, thanks to Big Morongo Preserve staff. Membership Hike Summer is coming to a close and the days will be cooling down so we will resume our monthly hikes for members in September. These special hikes feature one of our biologists taking a limited number of members out to look for bighorn sheep. Our next Bighorn Hike for Members will be Friday September 9th at 8:00am and we'd love to have you join us. Membership starts at just $25/year and is completely tax- deductible. Space is limited, no dogs, and you must RSVP for this first come first served hike. To sign up or for more information, please call us at 760-346-7334 or email us at bi@bighorninstitute.org. Save the Date: 2016 Fundraiser Bighorn Institute's Annual Party and Golf Classic will take place November 20th & 21 st. This year's entire event will take place at the exclusive Stone Eagle Golf Club. With their newly built Aerie restaurant, this venue is sure to wow with amazing views of our beautiful Santa Rosa Mountains. Please mark your calendars and look for invitations by early October. Auction Items Needed Do you have sports tickets, a condo, a boat, or any other exciting items you would consider donating to our annual fundraiser? We're always looking for fun and exciting new auction items for our Annual Party live and silent auctions. Don't have a "big" item but would like 311 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/08/31/August-2016[11/5/2016 4:31:16 PM] August 2016 I bighorninstitute to help? x. r Fantastic! We'd love to include your gift; all donated items are completely tax-deductible. The Institute's 2016 Annual Party and Golf Classic will take place November 20th & 21 st and supports our conservation efforts for the endangered Peninsular bighorn sheep. Please help us make this year's event a huge success for the sheep! To donate please call 760-346-7334. 0 M-Wts 0 Sort by Oldest Add a comment... El Facebook Comments Plugin 312 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/08/31/August-2016[11/5/2016 4:31:16 PM] September 2016 I bighominstitute Bighorn Institute HOME ABOUT US PROJECTS WAYS YOU CAN HELP Drarlaj* September 2016 Annual Fundraiser Bighorn Institute 29t6 Annual Part q anJ GcA Classic :• STONF- tAGLr- cwem6er Zo - 211 zo16 Bighorn Institute's 2016 Annual Party and 29th Annual Golf Classic will be November 20th & 21st, and we hope you will join us! This year, the entire event will take place at Stone Eagle, a stunning venue set in the Santa Rosa foothills. Annual Party festivities include great food and drinks, and live and silent auctions at The Aerie, a brand new luxury restaurant with breathtaking views! Don't miss this special opportunity to support the sheep and see Stone Eagle; tickets are $400/couple. Monday's golf tournament will be hosted once again by golf legend and putting guru, Dave Stockton. Dave and friends will provide a professional's clinic with tips that are sure to improve your game! Golf is $950/player and includes 2 tickets to the Annual Party. Visit our Follow Us 0 website for details http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O9/3O/September-2016[11/5/2016 4:32:02 PM] 313 September 2016 I bighominstitute www.bighorninstitute.org We need auction items and all gifts are completely tax-deductible! Large or small donations are welcome; everything helps! Please help us make this year's event a huge success for the sheep! To donate, please call 760-346-7334. Wild Bighorn Update Bighorn Institute monitors bighorn sheep from Palm Springs to La Quinta. Overall, these herds are doing well, especially in the mountains around Rancho Mirage and Palm Springs. Most of the Iambs are 6-8 months old and are now weaned. Rams' raucous rutting behaviors have broken up ewe and Iamb groups with some Iambs apparently seeking ewes with fewer disruptions. We've seen several recent groups of sheep with a skewed number of Iambs per ewes. With rams roaming miles in search of ewes to breed, these Iambs will surely not have solace for long no matter who they choose to live with. The rut is now in full swing so we'll continue to follow the sheep, document their health and behavior and marvel at their majesty. Here is a short news story on our fieldwork on KESQ: http://www. kesq.com/news/tracking-bighorn-sheep-with-the-bighorn-institute/99653662 Community Outreach Bighorn Institute gave two talks this month, one to the Palm Springs Rotary Club and the other to the Rancho Mirage Rotary Club. We enjoyed meeting 314 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O9/3O/September-2016[11/5/2016 4:32:02 PM] September 2016 I bighominstitute x with these local 1� clubs and thank q .+a them for inviting t , us to speak to them about the endangered Peninsular bighorn t sheep and Bighorn Institute's •F, j ,�i conservation efforts. Education is an important part of our mission, so if you would like us to give a presentation at one of your events, please call 760-346-7334 or email us at bi@bighorninstitute.org. Membership Hike We resumed our monthly membership hikes in September after a brief summer hiatus. We hiked with a great group of members in Chino Canyon in Palm Springs and had a fantastic time finding sheep! If you are interested in a unique learning experience with a chance at seeing wild sheep then a membership hike is the perfect, experience for you! Our next hike will be Monday October 10th at 8:OOam. Membership starts at just $25/year and is completely tax-deductible. Space is limited, no dogs, and you must RSVP for this first come first served hike. To sign up or for more information, please call us at 760-346-7334 or email us at bi@bighorninstitute.org. 315 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O9/3O/September-2016[11/5/2016 4:32:02 PM] September 2016 I bighominstitute Sheep hit on Hwy 74 September was a tough month for bighorn crossing Highway 74 south of Palm Desert as three of them were hit and killed by a ' cars, two rams y ' and a Iamb. We ;,. have been '3 working with s� �, x .•vim :_ Caltrans and the wildlife agencies to get more t"4 = warning signs and Caltrans has finally agreed to install two yellow beacon signs on Highway 74. We feel these signs will be a tremendous help alerting motorists to the presence of sheep on this treacherous road. We'll let you know when the signs are installed, but in the meantime, please use extra caution driving Highway 74. Update La Quinta Fence There has been little to no progress toward the installation of a barrier or fence in La Quinta to keep bighorn from coming down to the golf courses and urban areas, despite the wildlife agencies mandating that a fence be completed by February 2016. As a result, the Center for Biological Diversity and Sierra Club have issued a 60 day notice of intent to sue the state and federal wildlife agencies, City of La Quinta and Coachella Valley Conservation Commission for failing to protect the endangered 316 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O9/3O/September-2016[11/5/2016 4:32:02 PM] September 2016 I bighominstitute Peninsular bighorn in La Quinta. Here is a copy of the notice as well as recent news stories: Press Release: Legal Challenge Pursued Over Failure to Protect Endangered Peninsular Bighorn Sheep http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press releases/2016/peninsular-bighorn-sheep- 09-27-2016.html http://www.desertsun.com/story/news/environment/20l6/O9/27/bighorn-sheep keep- wandering-onto-golf-courses-now-activists-plan-sue-demand-fence/91196258/ http://www. pe.com/articles/bighorn-814337-conservation-fish.html 0 Mn jWts o Sort by Oldest , Add a comment... Ej Facebook Comments Plugh 317 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O9/3O/September-2016[11/5/2016 4:32:02 PM] October 2016 I bighorninstitute Bighorn Institute HOME ABOUT US PROJECTS WAYS YOU CAN HELP Dom* October 2o16 Ram Movements During the rut, or breeding season, rams will travel miles in search of ewes to breed. They can lose as much as 25% of their body weight with this increased activity. Most of the rams are unmarked, but many have distinguishable horn characteristics allowing us to tell the difference between individuals. We documented an interesting ram movement this October. A ram known to inhabit Bear Creek Canyon in the La Quinta area was observed as far north as Magnesia Canyon around Rancho Mirage this year. That's approximately 9 miles, as the crow flies and involves crossing Hwy 74! This kind of ram movement is important to keep gene flow moving and the bighorn population healthy. Helicopter Survey The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) will conduct a range - wide survey of bighorn sheep in the Peninsular Ranges in Follow Us 0 318 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/10/31/October-2016[11/5/2016 4:32:39 PM] October 2016 I bighorninstitute D B ghorn Institute Elm November. While these surveys are S usually biennial it sx°,r� has been 6 years ,e+, since one has , y been conducted due to the lack of15 , µsr' ti a helicopter ati, contract. This survey will allow CDFW to determine the current population of bighorn sheep in the range (the mountains from Palm Springs to Mexico). The last survey was in 2010 and estimated 950 Peninsular bighorn. Population and demography data are vital to the management of an endangered species and we look forward to the current survey results. Member Hike Our membership hike in October �. a • s �; . _ was another wonderful success S as all of our hikers - saw 5 sheep! We were able to track ,. one of the ewes that wears a GPS •`.'! `� 'r <:a s^, ` Via;= collar so the hike 14 had some extra excitement. Our next Member Hike will be Friday November 11th at w 8:00am. We will �� e �,• likely hike Carrizo or Dead Indian a •nw �:4 4 Canyons as they are only open from October through December to protect the sheep. Space is limited, no dogs, and you must RSVP for this first come first served hike. To sign up or for more information, please call us at 760-346-7334 or email us at bi@bighorninstitute.org. Have You Seen Sheep? Bighorn Institute http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/10/31/October-2016[I1/5/2016 4:32:39 PM] 319 October 2016 I bighorninstitute monitors bighorn from Palm Springs to La Quinta, but most of the sheep are not radio - collared. This is a vast area for our few biologists so we need your help! If you're out hiking and see bighorn sheep, please log your sightings in Bighorn Institute's project in Naturalist. It's free, it's easy and it will certainly help us keep better track of the herds. As we mentioned previously, many bighorn have distinguishable horn characteristics allowing us to identify individuals, but we are also looking for sightings on marked sheep since some have collars that no longer work. Please click on the photo for details on how to log your sheep sightings or visit our website: www.bighorninstitute.org/inaturalist-project Upcoming Fundraiser November 20 &21 Our Annual Party and Golf Classic are fast _sue. approaching and we hope you will join us! You don't want to miss this amazing event at Stone Eagle Golf Club in Palm Desert. Sunday's Annual Party festivities include live and silent auctions, great food and drinks and more at the brand new, beautiful Aerie restaurant! Monday's Golf Classic includes a professional's clinic, great tee prizes, breakfast, lunch and awards following play. For more information, please call 760-346-7334 or visit our website: www.bighorninstitute.org/fundraisers 320 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/10/31/October-2016[I1/5/2016 4:32:39 PM] October 2016 1 bighorninstitute 0 Comments F_rI . •uu-a 9 Facebook Comments Plugin Sort by � Oldest http://www.bighominstiitate.org/single-post/2016/10/31/October-2Ot6[11/5/2016 4:32:39 PM] 321 322 Exhibit 3: Letter from US Fish and Wildlife and California Department of Fish and Wildlife dated February 28, 2014 323 u.y- U.S_ Fish and Wildlife Service FLSId 2 ypiy71744k'k`. 8tREV � Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office if— ,r 777 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Suite 208 "- Palm Springs, California 92262 760-322-2070 FAX 760-322-4648 In Reply ReferTo: FWS-CDFW-FKI V-09B0023-13TA0160 Mr. Tom Kirk ATTACHMENT 1 California Department of Fish and Wildlife Inland Deserts Region 78078 Country Club Drive, Suite 109 Bermuda Dunes, California 92203 760-200-9158 FAX 760-200-9358 Executive Director Coachella Valley Conservation Commission 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 200 Palm Desert, California 92260 RLCEIVED Mr. Frank J. Spevacek City Manager City of La Quinta P.G. Box 1504 La Quinta, California 92247 MIAs, 0 3 2014 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE FEB 2 S 2014 0 [V �q /I �7 V Subject: Notification that Peninsular Bighorn Sheep (Dvis canadensis nelsoni) are using artificial sources of food in unfenced urban areas in the City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California Dear Messrs. Kirk and Spevacek: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or USFWS) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department; formerly California Department of Fish and Game or CDFG), jointly referred to as the Wildlife Agencies, provide this notice to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (CVCC) and the City of La Quinta (City or Local Permittee) to express our concerns regarding urban -related impacts to the Peninsular Ranges Distinct Population Segment of Nelson bighorn sheep (Peninsular bighorn sheep, Qvis canadensis nelsoni), a federally endangered species and a State endangered and fully protected species. CVCC and the City are permittees under the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (CVMSHCPINCCP) through Federal Fish and Wildlife Permit TE104604-0 and State of California NCCP Permit 2835-2008-001-06. Members of the public, including the Bighorn Institute of Palm Desert, California, have informed us that Peninsular bighorn sheep are regularly observed grazing within several golf resorts in the La Quinta area, including SilverRock Resort, PGA West, and The Quarry at La Quinta. These developments are located at the wildland-urban interface along the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains in La Quinta, adjacent to Peninsular bighorn sheep habitat in the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area of the CVMSHCP/NCCP. The Bighorn Institute has obtained photographic documentation of Peninsular bighorn sheep on these properties, and Peninsular bighorn sheep have been seen on the PGA West golf course during various televised events (see Enclosure 1), including the recently televised Humana Challenge tournament in January 2014. 324 Mr. Torn Kirk(FWS-CDF'W-ERIV-09B0023-13TA0160) 2 We are concerned -that rains, ewes, and lambs will continue to be attracted to forage, and possibly water sources, at golf resorts throughout the year, where they are at risk of injury and death from drowning in canals and swiru ping pools, toxic plant poisoning, vehicle strikes, the effects of ingesting intestinal parasites present among watered lawns and grasses, and other potential urban -related hazards. The death of three bighorn rams within urbanized areas of the City occurred during the summers of 2012 and 2013. One rani died of acute Nerium oleander poisoning on the grounds of PGA. West; the others were found drowned in the concrete -lined Coachella Canal, one in the vicinity of Madison Street and 52nd Avenue in La Quinta, and the other in the vicinity of Lake Cahuilla. According to Section 8.2A.1, itein 14, of the CV MSHCPINCCP: If the LISFWS or CDFG provides written notice to the CVCC or Local Perrnittee that Peninsular bighorn sheep are using artificial sources of food or water in unfenced areas of existing urban Development within or near a Conservation Area, the CVCC (unless otherwise agreed to by the applicable Local Pennittee) shall cause to be constructed a barrier to sheep access to cure the problem within 2 years of such notice. The location of this barrier (i.e., an 8-foot fence or functional equivalent) shall be determined by CVCC based oxr its ability to obtain permission/access to the necessary lands, if placement of a barrier must occur on other public lands (e.g., BLM [Bureau of Land Management], CDFG), CVCC will coordinate with these other agencies as appropriate. The.Service first approached CVCC on this issue on. May 30, 2012, at a CVMSHCP£NCCP Coordination Meeting at the Coachella Valley Association of Governments office in Palm Des6rt (see,Enclosure 2). Representatives of the Wildlife Agencies and CVCC subsequently met at the City -owned SilverRock Resort on June 12, 2012, with representatives of the City and Landmark Golf Management, which manages SilverRock resort for the City. Representatives of CVCC and the Wildlife Agencies met again to discuss the issue on August 20, 2012, at the Service's Palm Springs office. These parties and representatives of the Bighorn Institute nret again at SilverRock Resort on September 11, 2012, and at PGA West on July 26, 2013. Representatives of the Wildlife Agencies, CVCC, and the City met at the City of La Quinta Civic Center on January 9, 2014. In addition, the Service has continued to remind CVCC inforinally at CVMSHCPNCCP Coordination Meetings that Peninsular bighorn sheep were continuing to use the above sites for forage. Thus, we are formally providing written notice to you that Peninsular bighorn sheep are using the above mentioned locations for forage, and possibly water, at the urban-wildland interface on the edge of a CVMSHCP/NCCP conservation area. The 2-year clock for CVCC and potentially the City to construct a barrier to Peninsular bighorn sheep access at the La Quinta golf courses named above begins on the date of this letter. Although the CVMSHCP identifies fencing or a functional equivalent as a sheep barrier, it is well documented that adequate fencing will keep Peninsular bighorn sheep away from inappropriate forage and 325 Mr. Tom Kirk (FWS-CDFW-ERIV-09BM3-13TA0160) 3 water sources on golf resort properties, and will reduce the opportunities for Peninsular bighorn sheep to wander farther into the urban environment. In particular, we note the success of the Peninsular bighorn sheep fence built by the City of Rancho Mirage in 2002 in reducing Peninsular bighorn sheep mortalities in that area. Before the fence was constructed, the Bighorn Institute had documented 15 Peninsular bighorn sheep deaths in urbanized areas along California Highway 111. With the fence in place and maintained by the City of Rancho Mirage, no Peninsular bighorn sheep have peris€► A in that area from urban -related causes. We are not aware of any f metional equivalents to fencing at this time. Unless a functiand equivalent of fencing can be dmonstratedto be effective, we expect CVCC and the City to meet the requirements identified in 92.4.1, item 14, of the CVMSHCPINCCP within 2 years. We request CVCC and the City to involve the Wildlife Agencies in planning the location and type of fencing to be bWlt, and regularly inform us of progress toward irnpkmentatiom Accordingly, within. 6 months of the date of this letter, please provide the Wildlife Agencies with a letter -report of actions taken to notify and work with the golf resort ownerslmA�ers to plan fence construction, including a preliminary map of fence locations, provisions for developing any CEQA analysis that may be regiured, and a timeline for construction. If you have questions, please contact Jan ess McBride of the Service at 760-3222074 or Heather Pert of dm Department at 858-395-9692. Kennon A. Corey Assist&W Field Supervisor U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Enclosures Siincerely, David Elms Acting Regional Manager, Inland deserts Region California DeparfiZent of Fish and Wildlife 326 Exhibit 4: 60 Day Notice of Intent to Sue 327 CEO CENTER for BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY #71�_ VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED; AND ELECTRONIC MAIL September 27, 2016 Paul Souza, Regional Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 8 - Pacific Southwest Region 2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2606 Sacramento, CA 95825 Email: paul_souzakfws.gov Sally Jewell, Secretary Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington DC 20240 Email: Secretary iewellkios.doi.gov Charlton H. Bonham Director, Cal. Dept of Fish & Wildlife 1416 9th Street, 12th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814 Email: directorkwildlife.ca. oo Tom Kirk, Executive Director Coachella Valley Conservation Commission 73710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 200 Palm Desert, California 92260 Phone: (760) 346-1127 Email: tkirkkcva�_.org City of La Quinta c/o City Clerk Susan Maysels 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Email: sma. slss&la-quinta.org Sixty -Day Notice of Intent to Sue the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Coachella Valley Conservation Commission, California Department of Fish and Wildlife and City of La Quinta Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act For Failure to Implement The Terms and Conditions of Biological Opinion for the Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP Incidental Take Permit, NCCP Permit and Implementing Agreement; Notice of Violation of the MSHCP, the Incidental Take Permit No. TE104604-0, and the NCCP Permit No. 2835-2008-001-06; and Notice of Violation of California's Fully Protected Mammal Act [California Fish and Game Code §47001. This letter is to provide you with notice that the Center for Biological Diversity ("Center") and Sierra Club intend to file suit, pursuant to the citizen suit provision of the Endangered Species Act ("ESA"), 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g), to challenge the failure to comply with and implement the mandatory terms and conditions of the biological opinion for the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Communities Conservation Plan ("MSHCP"), Incidental Take Permit ("ITP") and the Implementing Agreement ("IA"). Arizona • California • Nevada • New Mexico • Alaska • Oregon • Montana • Illinois • Minnesota • Vermont • Washington, DC www.BiologicalDiversity.org 328 This letter also provides the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ("Service"), California Department of Fish and Wildlife ("Department"), the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission ("CVCC") and City of La Quinta ("La Quinta") with Notice of violations of the MSHCP, ITP, biological opinion, and California's Fully Protected Mammal Act. In light of the violations detailed herein, the Service and Department may immediately need to suspend or revoke the permit pursuant to 50 C.F.R §§13.27-13.29, California Fish and Game Code §2820 and the terms of the Implementing Agreement Section 23.5. In the alternative, in accordance with Section 23.3 of the Implementing Agreement, the Service and Department may seek injunctive and temporary relief to compel action by CVCC and La Quinta 1 These violations are particularly concerning to the Center and Sierra Club as the Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP is a very well designed plan. We urge the Service and Department to take action immediately to enforce the MSHCP, revoke or suspend the ITP issued to CVCC and La Quinta, and to enjoin the CVCC and La Quinta to construct a fence immediately. Fence construction should be completed before the next lambing season to protect Peninsular bighorn sheep populations that are at risk due to the failure of the CVCC and La Quinta to fully implement the terms of the MSHCP. I. Identity of the Organizations Giving Notice: The name, address, and phone number of the organizations giving notice of intent to sue under the ESA are: Center for Biological Diversity c/o Lisa Belenky, Senior Attorney 1212 Broadway, Suite 800 Oakland, CA 94612 ofc (510) 844-7107 fax (510) 844-7150 II. Counsel for the parties giving notice: Lisa T. Belenky, Senior Attorney Center for Biological Diversity 1212 Broadway, Suite 800 Oakland, CA 94612 ofc (510) 844-7107 fax (510) 844-7150 lbelenkykbiolo gicaldiversity. org III. Requirements of the ESA The Sierra Club 2101 Webster Street, Suite 1300 Oakland, CA 94612 (415) 977-5500 D. Wayne Brechtel, Attorney at Law 462 Stevens Avenue, Suite 100 Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 755-6604 dwbkwordenwilliams.com Section 9 of the ESA and its implementing regulations prohibit the unauthorized "take" of listed species. 16 U.S.C. § 1538(a)(1); 16 U.S.C. § 1533(d); 50 C.F.R. § 17.31. "Take" is 1 IA at sec. 23.3 ("Injunctive and Temporary Relief. The Parties acknowledge that the Covered Species are unique and that their loss as species would result in irreparable damage to the environment and therefore injunctive and temporary relief may be appropriate to ensure compliance with the terms of this Agreement.") Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 329 September 27, 2016 defined broadly to include harming, harassing, trapping, capturing, wounding or killing a protected species either directly or by degrading its habitat. See 16 U.S.C. § 1532(19). Taking that is in compliance with the terms and conditions specified in a biological opinion is not considered a prohibited taking under Section 9 of the ESA. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(o)(2). These protections are intended to ensure the conservation of listed species including the endangered Peninsular bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni). In order to obtain an Incidental Take Permit under the ESA Section 10 for incidental harm to listed species, a habitat conservation plan ("HCP") is needed. HCPs are designed to offset any harmful effects the proposed activity might have on the species in accordance with § 10 of the ESA. 16 U.S.C. § 1539. The ESA has strict requirements for consultation and implementation of Incidental Take Permits that cannot be violated. For a habitat conservation plan, the plan, implementing agreement, and incidental take permit are analyzed and approved as a complete package, if any conservation and management measures fall short then the conclusions in the BO are invalid, consultation must be reinitiated and the ITP should be suspended or revoked. See 50 C.F.R. § § 13.27 ("may be suspended at any time if the permittee is not in compliance with the conditions of the permit"), § 13.28 (permit revocation). Section 7 of the ESA requires all federal agencies to ensure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by the agency is not likely to (1) jeopardize the continued existence of any threatened or endangered species or (2) result in the destruction or adverse modification of the critical habitat of such species. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2). For each federal action, the action agency must request from FWS whether any listed or proposed species may be present in the area of the agency action. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. § 402.12. If listed or proposed species may be present, the federal agency must prepare a "biological assessment" to determine whether the listed species may be affected by the proposed action. Id. The biological assessment must generally be completed within 180 days. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(i). If the federal agency, including the FWS, determines that its proposed action may affect any listed species or critical habitat, the agency must engage in formal consultation with FWS. 50 C.F.R. § 402.14. To complete formal consultation when an HCP is proposed to be issued, FWS must provide itself with a "biological opinion" explaining how the proposed action will affect the listed species or habitat. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(b); 50 C.F.R. § 402.14. If FWS concludes that the proposed action "will jeopardize the continued existence" of a listed species, the biological opinion must outline "reasonable and prudent alternatives." 16 U.S.C. § 1536(b)(3)(A). If the biological opinion concludes that the action is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a listed species, and will not result in the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat, FWS must provide an "incidental take statement," specifying the amount or extent of such incidental taking on the listed species, any "reasonable and prudent measures" that FWS considers necessary or appropriate to minimize such impact, and setting forth the "terms and conditions" that must be complied with to implement those measures. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(b)(4); 50 C.F.R. § 402.14(i). In order to monitor the impacts of incidental take, the action agency must monitor and report the impact of its action on the listed species to FWS as specified in the incidental take statement. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(b)(4); 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.14(i)(1)(iv), 402.14(i)(3). If during the Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 336 September 27, 2016 course of the action the amount or extent of incidental taking is exceeded, the federal agency, here FWS, must reinitiate consultation with FWS immediately. 50 C.F.R. § 401.14(i)(4). The re -initiation of formal consultation is required and must be requested by the action agency or FWS if (1) the amount or extent of taking specified in the incidental take statement is exceeded; (2) new information reveals effects of the action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner or to an extent not previously considered; (3) the action is modified in a manner that causes an effect to the listed species or critical habitat that was not considered in the biological opinion; or (4) a new species is listed or critical habitat designated that may be affected by the identified action. 50 C.F.R. § 402.16. After the initiation or re -initiation of consultation, the action agency is prohibited from making any irreversible or irretrievable commitment of resources with respect to the agency action which may foreclose the formulation or implementation of any reasonable and prudent alternative measures. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(d). IV. Requirement of California's Fully Protected Mammal Act Under California statutes, certain species are afforded special protection. One such species is the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep. California Fish and Game Code section 4700 states: (a) (1) Except as provided in this section, Section 2081.7, or Section 2835, a fully protected mammal may not be taken or possessed at any time. No provision of this code or any other law shall be construed to authorize the issuance of a permit or license to take a fully protected mammal, and no permit or license previously issued shall have any force or effect for that purpose. However, the department may authorize the taking of a fully protected mammal for necessary scientific research, including efforts to recover fully protected, threatened, or endangered species. (2) As used in this subdivision, "scientific research" does not include an action taken as part of specified mitigation for a project, as defined in Section 21065 of the Public Resources Code. (3) A legally imported fully protected mammal may be possessed under a permit issued by the department. (b) The following are fully protected mammals: (2) Bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), except Nelson bighorn sheep (subspecies Ovis canadensis nelsoni) as provided by subdivision (b) of Section 4902. In order to comply with the provisions of California Fish and Game Code section 4700, the MSHCP, the IA and the ITP were all drafted with the understanding that no death of bighorn sheep was to be authorized. Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 331 September 27, 2016 V. The MSHCP, Biological Opinion, ITP, NCCP Permit, and IA The MSHCP, ITP, and IA went into effect in 2008 when the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issued the final permit for the CVMSHCP on October 1, 2008. In accordance with the ESA, the Fish and Wildlife Service also adopted a biological opinion (`BO") in conjunction with the ITP. The California Department of Fish and Game had already issued the Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) Permit for the CVMSHCP on September 9, 2008. The Coachella Valley MSHCP covers a broad area and a long list of species. The MSHCP, related Implementing Agreement, and Permits provide "take" authorization for extensive development within the plan area that affects numerous endangered and threatened species. Importantly, with regard to Peninsular bighorn sheep, the MSHCP required the CVCC and the signatory agencies to implement conservation measures to protect and recover Peninsular bighorn sheep populations and to prevent of "take" of bighorn sheep. The measures specifically did not allow for "take" because Bighorn Sheep are fully protected mammals under California law. (Cal. Fish and Game Code § 4700.) With respect to Peninsular bighorn sheep, the MSHCP states the following: Although fully protected species are included in the list of Covered Species, Take of these species is not authorized in the NCCP Permit and is prohibited by California Fish and Game Code. The following species in the MSHCP are fully protected under the California Fish and Game Code: 1) Peninsular Bighorn Sheep... (MSHCP, page 7-1.) The Peninsular bighorn sheep is a California Fully Protected Species and as used with respect to PBS, Take Authorization refers only to disturbance of habitat. The MSHCP does not permit Take of an individual PBS. All Covered Activities of the Plan must avoid actions in violation f Section 4700 of the Fish and Game Code that addresses Fully Protected Species (See IA Section 15.5) (MSHCP, Section 7.3.3.2, Page 7-53, emphasis added.) Consistent with the statements within the MSHCP, the Implementing Agreement included the following provision at section 15.5: 15.5 Fully Protected Species. The following Covered Species listed in the MSHCP are fully protected under California Fish and Game Code sections 3511 and 4700: 1) Peninsular bighorn sheep; Take of these species is prohibited under the California Fish and Game Code except as specifically provided in section 2081.7 of that Code. CDFG acknowledges and agrees that if the measures set forth in the MSHCP are fully complied with, the Covered Activities are not likely to result in Take of fully Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 335 September 27, 2016 protected species, except by CVWD. If CDFG determines that such measures are not adequate to prevent Take of one of the Fully Protected Species, CDFG shall notify the CVCC, USFWS and other affected Permittees in writing of such discovery and propose new, additional, or different Conservation measures that it believes are necessary to avoid Take of these species. The affected Permittees shall implement measures proposed by CDFG or such other measures agreed to by the Parties as adequate to avoid Take of Fully Protected Species... The MSHCP identifies various Conservation Areas and specifies requirements for each. For Unit 6, which is near La Quinta, the measures include provisions to restrict bighorn sheep use of existing urban development nearby. Among the required measures is MSHCP 8.2.4.1 item 14, which states: 14. If the USFWS or CDFG provides written notice to the CVCC or Local Permittee that Peninsular bighorn sheep are using artificial sources of food or water in unfenced areas of existing urban Development within or near a Conservation Area, the CVCC (unless otherwise agreed to by the applicable Local Permittee) shall cause to be constructed a barrier to sheep access to cure the problem within 2 years of such notice. The location of this barrier (i.e., an 8-foot fence or functional equivalent) shall be determined by CVCC based on its ability to obtain permission/access to the necessary lands. If placement of a barrier must occur on other public lands (e.g., BLM, CDFG), CVCC will coordinate with these other agencies as appropriate. (Emphasis added.) Unfortunately, since at least 2012, not only have sheep been using unfenced areas of existing urban Development by Unit 6, but there have been twelve documented deaths of Peninsular bighorn sheep within urbanized areas in and near La Quinta. Developments within the City of La Quinta that are causing bighorn sheep death include The Quarry, Lake Cahuilla County Park, PGA West, SilverRock, and The Tradition. In 2016, all of the sheep deaths were lambs under 6 months of age that contracted diseases, while numerous incidences have been documented of sheep entering urban areas, including running through traffic. This was exactly the kind of problem that Item 14 was created to address. Accordingly, a letter was sent by the Service and Department on February 28, 2014 invoking the provision of MSHCP 8.2.4.1, Item 14. As the Department's Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Annual Report 20142 explained regarding the San Jacinto Mountains (SJM), Northern Santa Rosa Mountains (NSRM), and Central Santa Rosa Mountains (CSRM) areas: SJM, NSRM & CSRM: - Threats and concerns — habitat fragmentation, urban use, and human disturbance: Urban development within and adjacent to sheep habitat continue to be the main concern within these 3 regions. The BI [Bighorn Institute] has documented routine movement of sheep from the CSRM to the NSRM recovery regions across Highway 74 and sheep continue to be struck and 2 Available at hgps:Hnrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=97891 Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 339 September 27, 2016 killed on the this highway. Improved signage and warning devices may prevent accidents that can potentially harm both sheep and humans. CSRM rams have been documented foraging on golf courses in La Quinta since 2007: in 2012, both ewes and lambs were documented foraging on golf courses as well. Golf cart bridges across the Coachella Canal allow sheep easy access to grasses and oleander bushes at the golf courses and surrounding homes. In 2014, BI documented an increase in sheep use of urban areas with 12 separate reported incidents of bighorn sheep, including lambs, walking in the streets of La Quinta adjacent to the SilverRock and PGA West golf courses. The use of these areas change natural foraging patterns of sheep and expose them to a variety of risks associated with use of the urban landscape such as increased predation, vehicle strikes, entanglement, drowning, increased parasite loads, and exposure to toxins. Since 2012, three rams have drowned in the Coachella Canal, one ram was rescued, and a fourth ram died from oleander poisoning. Construction of fences at the urban interface is identified as a site specific recovery action for the Santa Rosa Mountains south of Highway 74 in Section ILD.1.2 of the recovery plan. Construction of fencing to exclude bighorn sheep from golf courses and residential areas in La Quinta would be an important step toward preventing urban related mortalities and enhance efforts toward conservation of sheep in the CSRM. For example, the exclusion fence built in Rancho Mirage in 2002 has completely eliminated urban -related bighorn sheep deaths. On February 28, 2014, CDFW and the USFWS sent a joint notification letter to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (CVCC) and the City of La Quinta stating that due to documented sheep use of artificial water and food sources in unfenced existing urban development within the City of La Quinta, and as required under the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan that installation of an exclusion barrier (i.e., 8-foot high fence) to cure the problem must take place within two years of notification. 2014 Report at 19-20 (emphasis added). The Department's Peninsular Bighorn Sheep 2015 Annual Report3 continued to raise these concerns and explained why fencing is critical and alternative measures are not feasible: CSRM rams have been documented foraging on golf courses in La Quinta since 2007; and in 2012, ewes and lambs began foraging at golf courses as well. Ewes and their lambs now forage at PGA West, SilverRock, or Tradition on a daily basis. Incidents of sheep walking on the streets and throughout residential neighborhoods in La Quinta continue to increase each year. Sheep use of the urban environment changes their natural foraging patterns and behavior and expose them to a variety of risks such as increased spread of diseases, vehicle strikes, entanglement, drowning, predation, increased parasite loads, and exposure to toxins. Since 2012, 3 rams and 1 lamb have drowned in the Coachella Canal, 1 ram was rescued from the canal, 1 ram died from oleander poisoning, and 1 ram was struck and killed on Jefferson Avenue. 3 Available at hgps:Hnrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=129531 Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 334 September 27, 2016 Disease is rapidly spread among sheep that concentrate within the golf course communities. In 2015, lambs on the golf course were observed with pneumonia and only 11 % of these lambs survived their first year (refer to sections on Respiratory Disease and Lamb Survival and Recruitment for details). Fencing at the urban interface is identified as a site specific recovery action for the Santa Rosa Mountains south of Highway 74 in Section II.D.1.2 of the recovery plan (USFWS 2000). Construction of fencing to exclude bighorn sheep from golf courses and residential areas in La Quinta would be an important step toward preventing urban related mortalities and enhance efforts toward conservation of sheep in the CSRM. For example, the exclusion fence built in Rancho Mirage in 2002 has completely eliminated urban -related bighorn sheep deaths. Other potential actions, such as the capture and removal of sheep from the golf course communities would not be feasible. Ewes teach their lambs where to obtain food and water and once a pattern of use (home range) is established it is maintained from one cohort to the next. Sheep are capable of traveling great distances over a short period of time and would easily find their way back to their original home range. Furthermore, because disease has been identified within the urban ewe group, removal of these sheep to another area would facilitate the spread of disease to other areas of the range. 2015 Report at 18 (emphasis added). Although CVCC and La Quinta began preparations in 2014 to construct the required fence, including seeking cost estimates, no construction of the fence has occurred to date. On February 25, 2016, CVCC issued a Notice of Preparation for an Environmental Impact Report, just a few days before the deadline, and the proposed project appears to be designed to lengthen the time it will take to construct this critical fencing rather than expedite it. In fact, no additional environmental review is needed before the fence can be constructed as it was already analyzed in the EIS/EIR for the CV MSHCP/NCCP and, accordingly, fencing was required as a mitigation measure in the approvals for several projects in this area including the Winchester Development/The Quarry and SilverRock Resort. The two-year deadline specified in Item 14 has now passed. Therefore, CVCC and La Quinta are in violation of the mandatory requirements of the MSHCP, BO, ITP and IA. CVCC has failed and refused to adequately "oversee the Monitoring Program for the Reserve Lands pursuant to Section 8" as detailed in the MSHCP at §6.1.6 and has failed to "cause to be constructed a barrier to sheep access to cure the problem within 2 years of such notice" as required in MSHCP at 8.2.4.1, Item 14. The FWS has failed to take action to suspend or revoke the permit, as required under Section 23.5 of the Implementing Agreement, Section 8 of the Biological Opinion, and Special Terms and Condition 12 of the Threatened and Endangered Species Permit. The Department has failed to suspend or revoke the permit in accordance with Section 23.5 of the Implementing Agreement and Section 8 of the NCCP Permit. Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 339 September 27, 2016 The conservation and management measures required in the MSHCP to benefit the affected species take place on both private and public lands managed by various participating agencies. La Quinta is signatory to the Implementing Agreement and is bound to carry out the conservation and management measures assigned to them under the MSHCP, BO, NCCP and IA. The structure of the MSHCP assigns certain tasks to the CVCC on behalf of the signatories. All of the conservation and management measures in the MSHCP are incorporated as mandatory terms and conditions of the BO. The BO states: All of the conservation and management measures in the MSHCP and accompanying agreements, together with the terms identified in the associated IA and the special permit terms and conditions, are hereby incorporated by reference as reasonable and prudent measures, and terms and conditions for this incidental take statement pursuant to 50 CFR 402.14(1). Such terms and conditions are non - discretionary and must be undertaken by the Applicants for the exemptions under section 10(a)(1)(B) and section 7(o)(2) of the Act to apply. If the Applicants fails to adhere to these terms and conditions, the protective coverage of the Permit and section 7(o)(2) may lapse. (BO at Section 6, page 186.) In addition, the BO Species Account contains the following statement regarding the required fencing at La Quinta: Sheep in the La Quinta area appear to have shown at least occasional attraction to urban settings which indicates that the potential for sheep use of urban areas exists beyond the northern Santa Rosa Mountains ewe group. As a result, the City of La Quinta has recognized the issue and mitigated potential adverse effects by requiring contingency fencing plans on several recent project approvals. In addition, the proponents of numerous other individual development projects recently approved through section 7 and/or CEQA review have agreed to either install appropriate barriers at the time of construction, or as a contingency strategy with pre -approved easements, funding, and responsible parties. Required Measure 114 emulates the contingency fencing plans developed by the City of La Quinta, and adequately addresses the concerns regarding urban sources of mortality. This Required Measure should benefit bighorn sheep when implemented. (BO, Appx. A Species Accounts page 624.) The ITP terms and conditions specify that the "authorization granted by this permit is subject to compliance with, and implementation of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and executed Implementing Agreement, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference." (ITP, Special Condition 2) 4 The reference to measure "I I" may have been a typo, as the statement is clearly referring to Measure 14 referenced above. Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 338 September 27, 2016 The NCCP permit at section 3.4 states: These findings are not merely informational. To the extent CDFG relies on implementation of particular measures to make a necessary finding under NCCP A, those measures constitute a binding set of obligations that take effect when CDFG approves the NCCP Permit for the HCP/NCCP. CDFG believes that all mitigation and conservation measures that it has relied on for purposes of its findings are separately required under the HCP/NCCP or the IA, or are express conditions of this NCCP Permit. Consequently CDFG does not anticipate that as a practical matter these findings, in and of themselves, will increase obligations of those operating under authority of this NCCP Permit. Section 6.2.2 of the NCCP Permit specifies that no take of Peninsular bighorn sheep is authorized, and Section 8 of the NCCP Permit states that the Permit is subject to suspension or termination by action of the Director of CDFG in accordance with the terms of Section 23.5 of the IA. The MSHCP as both a Habitat Conservation Plan and Natural Communities Conservation Plan, was analyzed, adopted and approved as a complete package. If any conservation and management measures fall short, then the ITP and NCCP Permit are invalid and they must be suspended or revoked. VI. Violations of Law A. Permit Violations- ESA Violation of any permit issued under the Endangered Species Act constitutes a violation of the ESA, 16 U.S.C. § 1540(a), which can be enforced through the citizen suit provision of the ESA. 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g). As detailed above, the permit conditions are not being met in material regard as to implementation of the MSHCP by the CVCC and La Quinta which have failed and refused to comply with permit conditions and the MSHCP requirements that it ensure the bighorn sheep barrier is constructed. Specifically, CVCC and La Quinta have failed to construct the barrier within 2 years of being notified by the Service and Department. This is a material violation of the MSHCP and the Implementing Agreement and, thereby, a violation of the ITP and NCCP. CVCC and FWS have failed to ensure that the needed conservation and management measures were undertaken, in violation of the permit, and FWS has failed to reinitiate consultation in violation of the ESA. B. Violations of Section 7 of the ESA; Failure to Comply With the Terms and Conditions of the BO and Failure to Reinitiate Consultation The FWS is violating the mandatory terms and conditions set forth in the biological opinion concerning the implementation of the MSHCP. FWS has also failed to reinitiate Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 319 September 27, 2016 consultation in light of information that the terms and conditions of the BO, ITP and NCCP Permit are not being met, in violation of the ESA. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(b)(4); 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.14(i)(1)(iv), 402.14(i)(4). Due to the failure to provide the conservation and management measures agreed to in the BO and ITP, the FWS has also failed to insure that development under the MSHCP does not result in take of Peninsular bighorn sheep, as required in the ITP. Through its failure to insure that the ITP take limit for Peninsular bighorn sheep has not been exceeded, the FWS is thereby failing to insure that the MSHCP and associated activities are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the Peninsular bighorn sheep populations. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2). The FWS has failed to timely reinitiate and complete the reinitiated consultation regarding the continued failure to implement the terms and conditions of the BO, MSHCP and IA by CVCC and La Quinta and the resulting impacts of development under the MSHCP on Peninsular bighorn sheep and its critical habitat in violation of the ESA. 16 U.S.C. §§ 1536(a)(2), 1536(b)(1)(A), 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.12, 402.14(e), 402.14(i)(4), 402.16. By allowing, authorizing, or approving projects and activities to proceed within the MSHCP area that may affect Peninsular bighorn sheep, prior to the reinitiation of and completion of consultation, the FWS is violating the ESA. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2), (d); Pacific Rivers Council v. Thomas, 30 F.3d 1050, 1056 (9th Cir. 1994). The continued approval and authorization of activities that may lead to take of Peninsular bighorn sheep under the MSHCP and ITP prior to the reinitiation and completion of consultation regarding the failure to fully implement conservation measures and terms and conditions of the BO and ITP, violates Section 7 the ESA. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2), (d); Pacific Rivers Council v. Thomas, 30 F.3d 1050, 1056 (9th Cir. 1994). C. Violations of Section 9 of the ESA The CVCC and La Quinta have failed to take steps required of them to protect the Peninsular bighorn sheep and ensure construction of the fencing. As a result, the CVCC has and La Quinta have failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the BO, ITP and IA by failing to implement a mandatory conservation measure under the MSHCP; therefore, the ITP may be suspended and any additional development actions that may result in "take" of Peninsular bighorn sheep under the MSHCP ITP are unauthorized and in violation of the ESA. Because FWS continues to allow CVCC and La Quinta to authorize, approve, and allow projects and activities under the ITP despite the violations of the terms and conditions of the MSHCP, BO, ITP and IA, the FWS is in ongoing violation of Section 9 of the ESA. 16 U.S.C. § 1538(a)(1); 16 U.S.C. § 1536(d); 50 C.F.R. § 17.3l(a). D. Violation of California Fish and Game Code 2820 Through its failure to ensure that the NCCP Permit take limit for Peninsular bighorn sheep has not been exceeded, the Department is thereby failing to insure that the MSHCP and associated activities are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the Peninsular bighorn Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 31� September 27, 2016 sheep populations. The California Fish and Game Code allows for Department approval of NCCP Permits, but if the level of take specified in the terms of the NCCP permit are violated, then the Department shall suspend or revoke the permit. California Fish and Game Code section 2820(c) specifies that: c) If a plan participant does not maintain the proportionality between take and conservation measures specified in the implementation agreement and does not either cure the default within 45 days or enter into an agreement with the department within 45 days to expeditiously cure the default, the department shall suspend or revoke the permit, in whole or in part. (Emphasis added.) The language of the Code is mandatory, compelling the Department to take action. Since no take of bighorn sheep individuals was authorized, and sheep death has occurred, the proportionality between take and conservation measures has not been maintained. Because the Department continues to allow CVCC and La Quinta to authorize, approve, and allow projects and activities under the NCCP Permit despite the violations of the terms and conditions of the MSHCP and IA, the Department is in ongoing violation of California Fish and Game Code section 2820 by failing to suspend or revoke its NCCP permit. It should be noted that California Fish and Game Code authorizes immediate action in the form of injunctive relief pursuant to section2822.5 E. Violation of Fish and Game Code 4700 With limited exceptions, no take of Peninsular bighorn sheep can be authorized. Although the Department is now authorized under Fish and Game Code Section 28356 to allow the take of fully protected species whose conservation and management is provided for in a NCCP approved by the Department, that section was enacted after the Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP was issued. Moreover, the Department is only permitted to authorize take as part of a conservation measure, and is not authorized to permit any take as part of any urban development. (See Center for Biological Diversity v. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204; 195 Cal. Rptr.3d 247). VII. Conclusion For the above stated reasons, CVCC, La Quinta, Department, and FWS have violated and remain in ongoing violation of the terms of the MSHCP, ITP, NCCP Permit, and terms and 5 Cal. Fish & Game Code §2822 ("The department may seek injunctive relief against any plan participant, person, or entity to enforce this chapter.") 6 Cal. Fish & Game Code §2835 ("At the time of plan approval, the department may authorize by permit the taking of any covered species, including species designated as fully protected species pursuant to Sections 3511, 4700, 5050, or 5515, whose conservation and management is provided for in a natural community conservation plan approved by the department.") Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 31g September 27, 2016 conditions of the biological opinion; therefore, the incidental take permit and NCCP Permit are both invalid and may be suspended or revoked. FWS has violated and remains in ongoing violation of Section 9 of the ESA for allowing take to occur without a valid take permit or take statement, and FWS has also violated and remains in ongoing violation of section 7 of the ESA for failing to reinitiate consultation. The Department has violated §4700 and §2820 of the California Fish and Game Code for failing to suspend or revoke the NCCP Permit and allowing death of Peninsular bighorn sheep, a Fully Protected Mammal, to occur as a result of urban development. This notice letter was prepared based on good faith information and belief after reasonably diligent investigation. We hope that the responsible agencies will act immediately to correct these violations and construct the needed fence to protect the Peninsular bighorn sheep as required under the terms of the plan. If you believe that any of the foregoing is factually erroneous or inaccurate, please notify us promptly. Sincerely, Lisa T. Belenky, Senior Attorney Center for Biological Diversity 1212 Broadway, Suite 800 Oakland, CA 94612 ofc (510) 844-7107 fax (510) 844-7150 lbelenkygbiolo gicaldiversity. org D. Wayne Brechtel, Attorney at Law 462 Stevens Avenue, Suite 100 Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 755-6604 dwb@wordenwilliams.com CC: (via email) Ken Corey Assistant Field Supervisor U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 777 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Ste. 208 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Email: Ken Coreykfws.gov Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 346 September 27, 2016 Trusted Legal Services Since 1975 November 8, 2016 City Council City of La Quinta 78-495 Catle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Re: Appeal of October 25, 2016 Planning Commission Approval of Site Development Permit 2016-0OO5 - SilverRock Development, LLC Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: This appeal is submitted on behalf of the Sierra Club and the Center for Biological Diversity ("Center"). The Sierra Club is a California non-profit corporation dedicated to the conservation and preservation of the nation's natural resources. The Sierra Club and its members utilize the natural, scenic and biological resources of the Coachella Valley and the City of La Quinta through their corporate and individual activities including scientific research, planning, education, and recreation. The Center is a non-profit environmental organization with more than one million members and online activists, including members Who Live in or visit the Coachella 'Valley and the City of La Ouinta. The Center uses science, policy and law to advocate for the conservation and recovery of species on the brink of extinction and the habitats they need to survive including the endangered bighorn sheep which will be affected by the proposed project. The legal issues are technical, but the crux of this appeal is straight -forward. The Site Development Permit at issue is part of a project that that is causing harm and death of Peninsular bighorn sheep because a promise to construct a fence to keep bighorn sheep out of harm's way has not been honored. The omission is inexcusable because the potential for bighorn sheep to enter the development site and suffer harm was identified when the project was first approved more than a decade ago, and the promise to construct a fence if needed was the foundation upon which ati. findings of no significant impacts to Areas of Practice Real Estate Estate Planning & Administration Business Land Use & Environmental Litigation Public Agency Attorneys 1).Wayne prechtel Kristen McBride Jason R. S€hingler Torner T. Gutman Tracy R. Richmond of Counsel D. Dwight Warden Re tired W. Scott Williams Retired Off ice 462 Stevens Avenue Suite 100 Solana Beach California 92075 (858) 755-6604 wordenwiltiarns.com 341 w City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 2 bighorn sheep rest. The foundation has crumbled because the fence has not beer. constructed, and as a result, bighorn sheep are dying. The Sierra Club and Center urge the Council to do the right thing and overturn the Planning Commission's approval of the Site Development Permit (SDP) and direct that the fencing required to prevent further harm to Peninsular bighorn sheep be put into place now. The time for excuses has passed, and failure to overturn the Planning Commission approval and direct the immediate construction of a protective fence would subject the City to unnecessary liability for the fallowing violations of law: 1. Violation of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) for allowing take of Peninsular Bighorn Sheep and for failing to build a sheep barrier 2. Violation of previously issued City approvals for the project for failing to comply with the conditions requiring a sheep barrier 3. Violation of the California Environmental Quality ,Act (CEQA) for failing to supplement the environmental review due to changed circumstances and new evidence of significant impacts to Peninsular Bighorn Sheep 4, Violation of CEQA for failing to enforce mitigation measures that require a sheep barrier 5. Violation of the Fully Protected Mammal Act for allowing take of Peninsular Bighorn Sheep 6. Violation of both the State and Federal Endangered Species Acts for allowing take of Peninsular bighorn sheep 7. Violation of the public trust The following detailed comments are provided in support of this appeal. We have attached numerous documents, and have incorporated by reference other documents that can be found within the City's files. We ask that all documents cited in this appeal be made a part of the administrative record for this matter. 342 .w City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 3 Evidence of Harm and Death of Reninsylar Bighorn Shee The original project approval, and its environmental review, occurred about fourteen years ago. Since that time, portions of the project have been developed, including a golf course. For several years, bighorn sheep have been entering the project site to access the golf course and surrounding areas. This has resulted in increased bighorn sheep illness and mortality, as summarized in the California Department of Fish and Wildlife's Peninsular Bighorn Sheep 2015 Annual Update ("CDFW Annual Update"). The CDFW Annual Update notes that since at least 2007, sheep have been increasingly using unfenced areas of existing urban development, including 12 documented deaths of Peninsular bighorn sheep within urbanized areas in and near La Quinta, including the SilverRock Development. CSRM rams have been documented foraging on golf courses in La Quinta since 2007; and in 2012, ewes and lambs began foraging at golf courses as well. Ewes and their Iambs now forage at PGA West, .:311verRock or Tradition on a daily basis, Incidents of sheep walking on the streets and throughout residential neighborhoods in La Quinta continue to increase each year: Sheep use of the urban environment changes their natural foraging patterns and behavior and expose them to a variety of risks such as increased spread of diseases, vehicle strikes, entanglement, drowning, predation, increased parasite loads, and exposure to toxins. Since 2012, 3 rams and 1 lamb have drowned in the Coachella Canal, 1 ram was rescued from the canal, 1 ram died from oleander poisoning, and 1 ram was struck and killed on Jefferson Avenue. Disease is rapidly spread among sheep that concentrate within the golf course communities. In 2015, lambs on the golf course were observed with pneumonia and only 11 % of these lambs survived their first year (refer to sections on Respiratory Disease and Lamb Survival and Recruitment for details), (California Department of Fish and Wildlife Peninsular Bighorn Sheep 2015 Annual Report, Page 18, Exhibit 1, emphasis added)' Y The 2015 Update highlights include the folLowing: Page 8 details a bighorn sheep death on Jefferson Street adjacent to the SilverRock property. Page 9 details how bighorn sheep lambs that feed on gulf courses (urban sheep) have a lower survival rate. Page 9 also has a photo of a sick lamb found on the SilverRock Golf Course, and discusses the observation of sick lambs, yearlings and ewes at SilverRock golf course. Pages 9-10 discuss a moribund lamb from the SilverRock Golf Course that was only 3-months-old but had to be euthanized due to severe iilness. The report concludes that the spread of diseases amongst urban bighorn sheep is facilitated by golf courses such as the 5iJytLR ck Golf Course. Page 12 shows the that one ewe group now spends much of its time foraging within or near the golf courses in La Quinta, and 343 U City Cound l City of La Qu i nta November 8, 2016 Page 4 In 2016, all of the sheep deaths were lambs under six months of age that contracted diseases, while numerous incidences have been documented of sheep entering urban areas, including running through traffic, or falling into the canal. (Bighorn Institutes Monthly Updates, February through October attached as Exhibit 2) 'ji]n May, Five Iambs died on the La Quinta go (courses during a two week period." Exhibit 2, Bighorn Institute June 2016 Monthly Update) While there are numerous urban -related causes for bighorn sheep illness and mortality, there is an undeniable connection between many of these events and the SilverRock Development. One need only review the CDFW Annual Update, Reports from the Bighorn Institute and photos provided in local papers to conclude bighorn sheep are frequenting the SilverRock Development site and suffering as a result. Accordingly, the Planning Commission's approval of the SDP is prohibited, because the site plan allows for the construction of urban facilities in areas now frequented by bighorn sheep, which would inevitably lead to further, unlawful harm to the species. 1. Violation of the Coachella Valley Multi le Species Habitat Conservation Plan for allowing take of Peninsular Bighorn Sheep and for failing to build a sheep harrier Since the project's original approval, the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) was adopted and the City becarne a permittee subject to certain terms and conditions. Rather than attach the entire MSHCP, we incorporate it by reference as part of the administrative record for this appeal, and provide the following summary. even maps out the "home range" of the urban sleep. "The core use areas are Silverfiock and PGA west golf courses and the desert slopes overlookir?g those courses "(sage 14). WA sheep are Learning the dangerous behavior of foraging on golf courses from the urban sheep, resulting in more sheep being habituated to the urban environment, and therefore more Likely to become sick. (Page 15) "Hopefully, a fence should be in place before this ewe, and others, become habituated to tho urban environment." (Page 15) (California Department of Fish and Wildlife Peninsular Bighorn Sheep 2015 Annuat Report Exhibit 1, emphasis added) 344 w City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 5 With respect to Peninsular bighorn sheep, the MSHCP stated the fallowing: "Although fully protected species are included in the list of Covered Species, Take of these species is not authorized in the NCCP Permit and is prohibited by California Fish and Game Code. The following species in the MSHCP are fully protected under the California Fish and Game Code: 1) Peninsular Bighorn Sheep... "(MSHCP, page 7-1) "The Peninsular bighorn sheep is a California Fully Protected Species and as used with respect to PBS, Take Authorization refers only to disturbance of habitat. The MSHCP does not permit Take of an individual PBS, All Covered Activities of the Plan must avoid actions in violation of Section 47DO of the Fish and Game Code that addresses Fully Protected Species (see IA .section 1.5.5)"(MSHCP, Section 7.3.3.2, Page 7-53, emphasis added) The MSHCP identifies various Conservation Areas and specifies requirements for each. For Unit 6, which is near La Quinta, the measures include provisions to restrict bighorn sheep use of existing urban development near Unit 6. Among the required measures is MSHCP 8.2.4.1 item 14, which states: 14, If the 1JSFW5 or CDFG provides written notice to the CVCC or Local Permittee that Peninsular bighorn sheep are using artificial sources of food or water in unfenced areas of existing urban Development within or near a Conservation Area, the CVCC (unless otherwise agreed to by the applicable Coral Perrnittee) shall cause to be constructed a barrier to sheep access to cure the problem within 2 ears of such notice. The location of this barrier (i.e., an 8-foot fence or functional equivalent) shall be determined by CVCC based on its ability to obtain permissionlaccess to the necessary lands If placement- or a Barrier must occur on other public lands (e.g., BLM,, CDFG), CVCC will coordinate with these ether agencies as appropriate. (emphasis added) In accordance with this measure, a Letter was sent by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife on February 28, 2014 invoking the provision of MSHCP 8,2.4.1, Item 14. This Letter is attached as Exhibit 3. To date, the fence has not been built and the two-year deadline has passed. 345 F� City Counci L City of La Qu i nta November 8, 2016 Page 6 The City, as a member agency to the MSHCP, has a duty to ensure that this measure is implemented. "The Local Permittees must also comply with all other terms and conditions of the AISHCP and IA (See Section 13.0 of the IA)..." (MSHCP, Section 6.6.1) 13.2 County and Cities Obligations The County and the Cities have the following obligations under the MSHCP and this Agreement: G. Take all necessary and appropriate actions, fallowing applicable land use permit enforcementprocedures and practices, to enforce the terms of project approvals for public and private projects, including compliance with the MSHCP, the Permits and this Agreement. (Implementing Agreement for the MSHCP) Sheep continue to die as a direct result of urban development within the City of La Quinta, which is a violation of the MSHCP, since no "take" was permitted by the MSHCP, and immediate action is needed. A fence was to be built within two years if sheep began entering urban areas. The two years have passed without the fence being constructed, which is a direct violation of the MSHCP cited above. Therefore, on September 27, 2016, we sent a Letter to both the US 'FWS and CDFWS seeking for them to revoke the Take Permit under the MSHCP. A copy of that letter is attached as Exhibit 4, 2. Violation of previousLy issued City approvals for the project for faiLing to cam ty with the conditions requiring a sheep barrier The City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency acquired the SilverRock Specific Plan Area in 2002. 525 acres of vacant property were purchased by the former La Quinta Redevelopment Agency for an area the Agency called "The Ranch". The Redevelopment Agency used property tax revenue and tax exempt and taxable bonds to fund this purchase and begin construction of the SilverRock Resort Arnold Palmer Classic Golf Course in 2004. The 18-hole Arnold Palmer Classic Golf Course opened in march 2005. This 18-hoLe public golf course occupies approximately 200 acres of the Specific Plan Area. In 2006, the City approved a Specific Plan to guide development for the remainder of the site. The Specific Ulan Area is slightly smalLer in size than the originaL "Ranch", but the uses allowed within the Specific Plan were similar to the original ruses contemplated by the Redevelopment Agency at the time of purchase. The SilverRock Resort Specific Plan was approved by Resolution 2006-083. The City selected a developer to implement the 346 FW City Council City of La Qu i nta November 8, 2016 Page 7 Specific Plan, but in 2008, the economic downturn precluded development and, shortly thereafter, the relationship with the developer came to an end. The City now intends to have the new developer move forward with implementation of the Specific Plan. The SilverRock Resort Specific Plan requires compliance with all mitigation measures identified in the MND and Addendum, which are discussed in more detail below. 3.2 Development Review Permits and Process The permits, appruvai process and required findings for development of .SilverRock are set forth in the City of La Quinta Zoning Code. In addition, the following shall apply' 32.16 SP 2006-0.90 shall comply with all applicable conditions and/ or mitigation measures for Environmental Assessment 200.E-453, Addendum 1. In the event of any conflict(5) between approval conditions and/ or provisions of these approvals, the Community Development Director s17ail determine precedence. (Page 48; Page 50)- In addition, the SilverRock Resort Specific Plan specifically found that compliance with the General Plan Natural Resources ELernent is predicated on the impLemaentation of the mitigation measures outlined in the environmental documents. The summary of key goals and aims identified in the General Plan are used in this Specific Plan Amendment for SilverRock as the basis for evaluating the Specific Plans consistency with the Citys General Plan, Applicable General Plan goals are stated below followed by a statement of how the SilverRock Specific Plan implements each. • The protection and preservation of unique andf or valuable biological resources, including sensitive, rare, threatened or endangered species and their habitat " • CEDA documentation in the form of an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Specific Plan identifies potential impacts to Biological resources and recommends necessary mitigation measures to 347 w City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 8 maintain potential impacts by the Specific Plan to less than significant levels. Preservation of the portion of the Santa Rosa Mountains within the Specific Plan Area and buffer measures to mitigate potential impacts to sensitive species in the mountainous terrain has been identified. (SilverRock Resort 5perifir Plan, Pages 51 and 59, General Plan Consistency with Natural Resources Element) In 2011, the State elected to abolish redevelopment agencies and liquidate their assets. The City became the owner of the golf course, rather than the Redevelopment Agency. In order to implement the Specific Plan, in November 2014 the City adopted a Development Agreement (DA) to provide SilverRock Development Company, LLC with a vested right to the current General Plan, SilverRock Specific Plan, and other specified land use entitlements. Annual review of the progress of the project was to be conducted pursuant to Section 4.3 of the DA. The DA was approved by an Ordinance, which references the mitigation requirements, and the document itself included the requitement to build the fence: NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California does ordain as follows: SECTION Z. ENVIRONMENTAL. An Addendum to a previously adapted Mitigated Negative Declaration (EA 2002-453) and subsequent Addendum (EA 2006-568) was prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, was confirmed and adapted by the City Council, on November 4, 2014. Said determination, extends to include this Development Agreement, based on its incorporation as part of the overall project, as defined under CEL9A. (Ordinance 520, Page 4 of 64, Recorded Document DOC #2014- 0484106; Development Agreement 2014-1001) 1.7 City CEQA Findings City finds that review of the environmental impacts of this Agreement and the Project has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the State and local guidelines adopted thereunder, and City has given consideration to such environmental review prior to its approval of this 348 LW; City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 9 Agreement and the Project and has undertakers all actions necessary to comply with CEQA. (DA, page 9) 3.3 Mitigation Monitoring Program The Developer shall also comply with the mitjgation monitoring program set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto (the Mitigation Monitoring Program). (DA, page 13) Exhibit C contains the ongoing requirement to build the fence. If Bighorn Sheep enter into the SRR SP Area, an 8-foot fence (or the functional equivalent) between the development and the hillside shall be constructed. The gaps should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less If determined necessary, the City shall construct temporary fencing while permanent fencing is constructed: The fence shall not contain gaps in which Bighorn Sheep can be entangled. if the Department transfer or disposes of any of the property adjacent to the hillside, the Department shall reserve an easement sufficient for the construction of fencing if needed in the future. (CIA, Exhibit C, page 7) In addition, in 2014 the City approved a Purchase, Sale, and Development Agreement (PSDA) - This is the main operative agreement for the sale and development of the property and includes the requirement for banding and construction of the fence prior to any grading on the site, as detaited in the fallowing provisions: 100 DEFINITIONS °`Luxury Hotel Fence" means a fence (or the functionalequivalent, as determined by City) that meets the applicable specifications and .standards of the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission acting as authorized agent for the requirements and obligations of the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. (PSDA, Page 6) 205. Conditions of Closing. Each of the Phase 1 Closing and Phase 2 Closing is conditioned upon the satisfaction of the following terms and conditions within the times designated below., 349 w City Council City of La Qu i nta November 8, 2016 Page 10 205.1 City's Conditions of Closing. City's obligation to proceed with the Phase 1 Closing or Phase 2 Closing (as applicable) is su6ject to the fulfillment, or waiver by City, of each and all of the canditicns precedent (a) through (w), inclusive, described below ("City's Conditions Precedent to the Closing'), which are solely for the Benefit of CityY, and which shall he fulfilled or waived by the time periods provided for herein: (q) Security for Luxury Hotel Fence. Developer shall have delivered to City evidence, in a form satisfactory to City, in Citys reasonable discretion, that Developer has obtained Contractor Bonds_ or other security acceptable to City, for the completion of the Luxury Hotel Fence. Said Contractor Bonds shall be Issued to, and shall be enforceable by City. (PSDA, pages 1.6-19, emphasis added) 208. installation of Luxury Hotel Fence; Implementation of bust Control Program. (a) Within the time set forth in the Schedule of Performance, and prior to the time Developer commences anE grading activities on the Phase T Property Developer shall install the Luxury Hotel Fence. Developer shall defend, with counsel approved by City in City: sole and absolute discretion, indemnify, assume all responsibility for, and hold the Indemnitees harmless from all claims, demands, damages, defense costs or liability of any kind arising from Developer's failure to strictly comply with the Mitigation Measures related to the protection of Bighorn Sheep set forth in that certain Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2802-435 (State Clearinghouse No. 1999081020). (PSDA, page 29-29 emphasis added) Notwithstanding the fact that all City Approvals to date have included the requirement to build the fence, Site Development Permit 2016-0005 does not include plans for construction of the fence, Accordingly, the Planning Commission's finding that the SDP is consistent with past approvals is erroneous and not supported by substantial evidence. 350 0 City Council City of La Ouinta November 8, 2016 Page 11 3. 'Violation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for failing to supplement the environmental review due to changed circumstances and evidence of new siignificant impacts to Peninsular Bighorn Sheep To date, environmental review for the project has been limited to a Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") and addendums to the MND. The City has never completed an EIR for this project. Approval of the initial project was supported by the MND (EA 2002-453). An addendum to the MND was prepared in 2006 to support approval of the Specific Plana (EA 2006-568) A second addendum to the MND was prepared in 2014 to support approval of the Development Agreement and the Purchase, Sale and Development Agreement (2014- 1.03). None of the environmental review documents contemplated significant impacts to Bighorn Sheep, and none of them assessed the potential for death of bighorn sheep. All impacts were to be mitigated to below significance. As there was no EIR, no Overriding Consideratiuns were adopted. Any potential impacts to the sheep were mitigated by the provision of a buffer, and the requirement to build a fence. At the time of the original project approval, the mitigation measures gained the support of the Resource Agencies: Agency Counsel Jenson noted the essential habitat lure for the gig Horn Sheep is at the toe of the dope and includes everything above that area. As for the Mitigated Negative Declaration, she stated oral comments were received from the Department of Fish & Game and L1.5 Fish and Wildlife and both were very satisfied with the mitigation measures (Redevelopment Agency Minutes for hearing on 5-15-2002, Page 5) The key language for each of the environmental review documents is provided below: 2002 MND (EA 2002-453) The requirement for a fence was one of the original mitigation measures of the project when it was approved in 2002. The Mitigated Negative Declaration included the following: The Santa Rosa Mountains have historically provided habitat for peninsular bighorn sheep, a state and federally listed endangered species. Additional 351 W' City Council City of La auinta November 8, 2016 Page 12 focused surveys performed in 1999 found no evidence of bighorn sheep in the vicinity of the Proposed Protect. The USPWS has defined the "essential habitat" of the peninsular bighorn sheep. Essential habitat covers the entire portion of the Cora1 Reef Mountains within the Project boundaries down to the too -of -slope. As no development would infringe above the toe -of -slope, no portion of the project would be developed in the essential peninsular bighorn sheep habitat Nonetheless, standard measures are included for the project should peninsular bighorn sheep came on site. Through the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, no significant imgacts would occur. (2002 MND page 15, emphasis added) Mitigation Measures 1. A mountain toe -of slope buffer /mitigation concept plan has been prepared to protect peninsular big horn sheep, and other wildlife, from entering the non -mountainous portion of the site proposed for development. This concept plan illustrates a continuous buffer to the toe -of -slope in areas where development could occur adjacent to the mountain edge. The concept plan delineates the location, acreage and native plant species envisioned for the mitigation area. This plan shall be incorporated into the project design and shall be subject to review by the City prier to the issuance of grading permits. A copy of this mountain toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan Is available for review at the City of La Quinta Community Development Department. 2. if Bighorn .Sheep enter onto the Project Site, an 8-foot fence (or the functional equivalent) between the development and the hillside shall be constructed. The gaps should be 11 centimeters ('4.5 inches) or less. if determined necessary, the City shall construct temporary fencing while permanent fencing is constructed. The fence shall not contain gaps in which Bighorn Sheep can be entangled. if the Agency transfer or disposes of any of the property adjacent to the hillside, the Agency shall reserve an easement sufficient for the construction of fencing if needed in the future. (2002 M N C, pages 16- 17) 352 rW CityCouncil City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 1,3 Note that the mitigation measure requires the City to build a temporary fence, if deemed necessary. The Resolution certifying the MND confirmed that the mitigation measures were adopted as part of the project. The mitigation measures identified In the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated into the Project and these measures mitigate any potential significant effect to a point where clParlV no significant environmental effects wilt occur as a result of this Project. (Redevelopment Agency Resolution 2002-009, emphasis added) The MMP lists the City of La Quinta as the responsibLe agency to ensure that the mitigation measure i5 enforced (Exhibit A to 2002 MND MMP, page 7) 2006 ADDENDUM (EA 2006-568) The 2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND continued the requirement for the fence. The Addendum included updated information to reflect changes in the Specific Plan Area, including but not limited to the development of one of the two allowed golf courses since the certification of the MND. The Addendum identified that City staff was working with the USFWS and CDFW regarding Peninsular bighorn sheep sightings on and adjacent to the Specific Plan Area and that, if needed, a Peninsular bighorn sheep perimeter fence would be installed Again, impacts to sheep were deemed less than significant with incorporation of the mitigation measures. Standard measures were included in the Ranch MNO should peninsular bighorn sheep come on to the Ranch Project site. Implementation of these mitigation measures would mitigate any potential impacts to bighorn sheep to a less than significant level. City staff is currently working with the USFWS and CDFG regarding recent peninsular bighorn sheep sightings on and adjacent to the SRR SP Area. If needed, a peninsular bighorn sheep perimeter fence maybe installed Impacts to biological resources associated with the SRR SP would be the same as these identified for the Ranch Project because the type of development and permitted uses would be substantially the same as previously analyzed in the MIVO. There is, therefore, no substantial change 353 LW City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 14 from the project that was subject to the I+MND and the SRR SP is consistent with the determinations, findings, and conclusions contained in the General Plan EIR. No new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with the implementation of the SRR SP Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures, identified in the adapted Final MND for the Ranch Project, are applicable to the proposed SilverRock Resort Specific Plan. 1. A mountain toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan has been prepared to protect peninsular Bighorn Sheep, and other wildlife, from entering the non -mountainous portion of the SRR SP Area proposed for development. This conceptplan illustrates o continuous buffer to the toe -of - slope in areas where development could occur adjacent to the mountain edge. The concept plan delineates the location, acreage and native plant species envisioned for the mitigation area. This plan shall be incorporated into the ,project design and shall be subject to review by the City prier to the issuance cf grading permits A copy of this mountain toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan is available for review at the City of La ►Quinta Community Development Department. 2, If Bighorn Sheep enter into the SRR SP Area, an 8-foot fence (or the functional equivalent) between the development and the hillside shall be constructed. The gaps should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches,) or less. If determined necessary, the City shall construct temporary fencing while permanent fencing is constructed. The fence shall not contain gaps in which Bighorn Sheep can be entangled. If the Department transfer or disposes of any of the property adjacent to the hillside, the Department shall reserve an easement sufficient for the construction of fencing if needed in the future. (2046 Addendum, pages 28-29) The Resolution certifying the Addendum fount that no significant impacts would occur, based on incorporation of the mitigation measures: WHEREAS, card Specific Plant application has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 354 w City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 15 1970' as amended (Resolution 83-68), in that the to Quinta Community Development Department has completed and addendum toEnvironmental Assessment (EA) 2002-453. The City has determined that the project with required Mitigation Measures will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore, recommends an Addendum to the previously certified Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact be certified; (City Council Resolution 2006-083) The MMP for the 2006 Addendum listed the same mitigation measures, with the City as the responsible agency to ensure compliance. (Addendum, MMP, page 7) 2014 ADDENDUM EA 2014-103 The 2014 Addendum recognized that sheep had begun entering the project site, but did not discuss any harm or significant impacts to sheep because the construction of the fence was going to mitigate the impacts to below significance. The Santa Rosa Mountains historically provided habitat for peninsular bighorn sheep a state- and federally -listed endangered specie.. Focused surveys performed in 1999 found no evidence of bighorn sheep in the vicinity of the 2002 MND Project Site, Essential habitat of the peninsular bighorn sheep in this area was defined by the IJSFWS to include the Santa Rosa Mountains down to the toe -of -slope. As no development was proposed to infringe above the toe -of -slope, no portion of the 2002 MND Project Site would have been developed in the essential peninsular bighorn sheep habitat. Nonetheless, mitigation measures were identified for the 2002 MND Project .should peninsular bighorn sheep encroach on to the 2002 MND Project Site. Mitigation measures 1 through 10 were found to mitigate any potential significant impacts to bighorn sheep. The 2014 Addendum (PA 2014-1003) also specifically found that the fence was required as mitigation for project impacts: Mitigation measures 1 through 10 were included in the 2002 MND to prevent peninsular bighorn sheep from corning onto the 2006 Addendum Project Site. The 2006 Addendum identified that City staff was working with 355 w City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 16 the USFWS and CDFC regarding peninsular bighorn sheep sightings on and adjacent to the Specific Plan Area and that, if needed, a peninsular bighorn sheep perimeter fence would be installed Implementation of these mitigation measures would mitigate any potential impacts to bighorn sheep to a less than significant level. Subsequent to adoption of the 2002 MND, construction of the Arnold Palmer Golf Course commenced. As identified above, mitigation measures 11 and 12 were implemented to minimize biological impacts identified in the 2002 MND. The 2006 Addendum identified that mitigation measures 1 through 10 were still applicable to the Specific Plan. Impacts to biological resources associated with the Specific Plan were identified as being the same as those identified in the 2002 M1VD because potential impacts to biological resources would be mitigated with implementation of the mitigation measures 1 through 10 identified in the 2002 MND. No substantial changes from the 2002 MND were identified and no new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts were identified for the Specific Plan. Bighorn sheep are a covered species within the CVMSCHP and development within or adjacent to bighorn sheep habitat is subject to a variety of requirements set forth in the CVMSCHP. The Modified Project Site is immediately adjacent to the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains, The 2002 MND identified mitigation measures to protect the bighorn sheep. Mitigation measure 1 and 2 require a mountain toe -of --slope buffer/mitigation concept plan that would include the development of a fence to prevent bighorn sheep access to the Modified Project Site. The plan would protect bighorn sheep and other wildlife from entering the golf course and development areas. The IJSFWS and the CDFW provided a notice to the City to express concerns regarding urban -related impacts to the peninsular bighorn sheep in February 28, 2014.21 .Specifically, the letter raised concerns regarding observations of bighorn sheep regularly grazing within several golf resorts including the golf course located within the .Specific Plan Area, The bighorn sheep are using these areas to forage and to possibly locate water. Pursuant to the 356 U City Cound I City of La Qu i nta November 8, 2016 Paige 17 CVMSHCP, when a written notice that bighorn sheep are using artificial sources of water or food in unfenced areas of existing urban development within or near a conservation area, a barrier (i.e. an 8-foot fence or functional equivalen) to sheep access is required to be constructed within two years of the notice. The notice also requires that the City provide the Wildlife Agencies (USFWS and CDFW) with a letter -report of actions taken to notify and work with golf resort owners1managers to plan fence construction. This report is required to include a preliminary map of fence locations, provisions for development, any CEQA analysis that may be required, and a timeline for construction. At a minimum, the City will provide an appra�r ate barrier as deemed necessary and accepted bE the Wildlife Agencies The City, in conjunction with the USFW , CDFW, and CVAG, is currently in discussions to prepare this plan, The Modified Project Site has been graded and partially developed with the Arnold Palmer Golf Course. The development of resort uses on previously graded areas would not have an adverse effect on any sensitive natural community identified in the General Plan, the CVM5HCP, policies, and regulations or by the CDFW or USFWS, The Modified Project will also include design features 6 and g identified in the 2035 General Plan to reduce potential impacts to sensitive biological species Any future development would be _subject to compliance with specific goals and measures set forth in the CVMSHCP. The Modified Project Site is not located directly within the CVMSHCP Conservation areas, but the Modified Project Site is located adjacent to the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area. The Modified Project would be required to pay the CVMSHCP1Natural Community Conservation Plan Mitigation Fee as required by design feature 1 identified in the 2035 General Plan. Consequently, impacts associated with the Modified Project would be similar to those identified in the 2002 MNO and 2006 Addendum and would be less than si nificant with the incur oration of mitt ation measures 1 through 10 identified in the 2002 MAD and 2006 Addendum, as well as the incorporation of design features 1, 6, and g identified in the 2035 General Plan. No new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts 357 Lw� City Council City of La auinta November 8, 2016 Page 18 would occur with the implementation of the Modified Project. (2014 Addendum, Section J.7, emphasis added) The MMP for the 2014 Addendum listed the same mitigation measures, with the City as the responsible agency to ensure compliance. (2014 MND, MMP, page 7) None of the CEQA documents have ever assessed the potential for significant impacts to Peninsular Bighorn Sheep. The early environmental documents stated that sheep never entered the project site. There is now undeniable evidence that sheep are entering the project site and that without implementation of the fence mitigation, impacts to bighorn sheep will be substantially more severe than contemplated in any of the existing environm+entat documents. Bighorn Sheep are becoming sick and are dying as a result of entering the project site. The new information provided by the CDFW 2015 Annual Report constitutes new information of substantial importance. It also means that there is a change in circumstances since the environmental review was completed. As indicated below, Bighorn Sheep are fully protected mammals and the City is obligated to consider this evidence prior to taking any further action that could harm the bighorn sheep. Pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15162, the City must require additional environmental review, which in this case means preparation of an EIR because of the significant impacts to bighorn sheep. Although there is a statutory presumption against additional environmental review, the substantial evidence in this case is overwhelming and clearly rebuts any presumption in favor of the developer. (Moss v County of Humboldt (2008) 162 Cal.App.4th 1041, 76 Cat.Rptr.3d 428, Melom v City of Madera (2010) 183 CaL.App.4th 41; 106 CaL.Rptr.3d 755) Agencies must still require further environmental review when the following conditions are met.] § 21166. SURSEQUENTOR SUPPLEMENTAL 1MP4CT I? EPOP ; CONDITIONS When an environmental impact report has been prepared for a prolect pursuant to this division, no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report shall be required by the lead agency or by any responsible agency, unless one or more of the following events occurs., (a) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the environmental impact report 358 LW City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 19 (b) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the environmental impact report (c) Npw information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the environmental impact report was certified as complete, becomes available. In this case, issuance of the SDP is considered a discretionary action which triggers the need to comply with CEQAI. The new information provided by the Fish and WILdLife Bighorn Sheep 2015 Annual Report, and the Bighorn Institutes monthly updates satisfy the conditions of Section 21166 regarding new information, because it was not known when the WIND was certified, is "of substantial importance" and demonstrates that the project will have significant effects not discussed in the previous negative declaration, and that effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than stated in the prior review. (GuideLines, § 15162, subd. (a)(3); cf. Laurel Heights improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1993) 6 C,ai.4th 1112, 1126-1129, 26 Cal.Rptr.2d 231, 864 P.2d 502.. 4. Violation of CEOA for falling to enforce miti ation measures that require a sheep -harrier CEQA Section 21081.6 requires the City to have fuLLy enforceable mitigation measures, and to ensure compliance through its Mornitoring Program, The City is the agency responsible to ensure compliance of the mitigation measure of constructing the fence during project implementation, but the City has failed to ensure compliance. 2 L1.14 "Discretionary Permits" means any permits, Approvals, plans, Project tract Maps, inspections, certificates, documents, and licenses that require o DiscretOnary Action, ir;cluding, without limitation, Project Site Development Permits, grading permits, stockpile permits, and encroachment permits. (DA, recorded as document 2014- 0484106) 359 U City Council City of La Ouinta November 8, 2016 Page 20 § 21081.6. FINQIN6S OR NEGATIVE DECLARATI0NS•_ REPORTING OR MpNI TORIIVG PROJECT CHANGES; EFFECT ON ENV ZRONAIENT C-ONDI TIONS (a) When making the findings required by paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 21081 or when adopting a mitigated negative declaration pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 21080, the following requirements shall apply:- (1) The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adapted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. For those changes which have been required or incorporated into the project at the request of a responsible agency or a public agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the project, that agency shall, if so requested by the lead agency or a responsible agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program. The lead agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based. (b) A public agency shall provide that measures to mitigate or award significant effects on the environment are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. Conditions of project approval may be set forth in referenced documents which address required mitigation measures or, in the case of the adoption of a plan, policy, regulation, or other public project, by incorporating the mitigation measures into the plan, policy, regulation, or project design. Once incorporated in an environmental document, mitigation measures cannot be defeated by ignoring them or by attempting to render them meaningless by moving ahead with the project in spite of them, even where subsequent approvals are ministerial. If a mitigation measure in an environmental document later becomes impractical or unworkable, a supplemental EIR must be prepared, the governing body must state a Legitimate reason for deleting the earlier adapted mitigation measure, and the governing 360 U City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 21 body must support that statement of reason with substantial evidence. (sierra Club v. County of San Diego, 231 Cal.App.4th 1152 (2014) 180 Cal.Rptr.3d 154) The purpose of these requirements is to ensure that feasible mitigation measures will actually be implemented as a condition of development, and not merely adopted and then neglected or disregarded. Lincoln Place Tenants Assn v. City of Los Angeles (2005) 130 CaLApp.4th 1491, 1508 (31 CaLRptr.3d 353, 366], as modified an denial of reh'g (Aug. 11, 2005) citing Federation of Hillside & Canyon Associations v City of Los Angeles (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 1252, 1261, 100 Cal.Rptr.2d 301. (Italics deleted). S Violation of the FulLy Protected Mammal Act for allowing take of Pertii!jj Lar Bighorn Sheep Pursuant to the Fish and Game Cade Section 711.7, the fish and wildlife resources are held in trust for the people of the state by and through the Department of Fish and Wildlife. Certain species within the state are afforded special protection. One such species is the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep, in accordance with Fish and Game Code 4700 which states: (a) (1) Except as pro vide in this section, Section 2 08 1. 7, or Section 2835, a fully protected mammal may not be taken or possessed at any time. No provision of this code or any other law shall be construed to authorize the issuance of a permit or license to take a fully protected mammal, and no permit or license previously issued shall have any farce or effect for that purpose. However, the department may authorize the taping of a fully protected mammal for necessary scientific research, including efforts to recover fully protected, threatened, or endangered species (2) As used in this subdivision, ':scientific research " does not include an action taken as part of specified mitigation for a project, as defined in Section 21065 of the Public Resources Code. (3) A legally imported fully protected mammal may be possessed under a permit issued by the department. (b) The following are fully protected mammals.• (2) Bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), except Nelson bighorn sheep (subspecies +Ovis canadensis nelson) as ,provided by subdivision (b) of Section 490E. 361 City Council City of La Qu i nta November 8, 2016 Page 22 With limited exceptions, no take of Peninsular bighorn sheep can be authorized. Although the Department i5 now authorized under Fish and Game Code Section 28351 to allow the take of fully protected species whose conservation and management is provided for in a natural community conservation plan approved by the Department, the Department is only permitted to authorize take as part of a conservation measure, and is not authorized to permit any take as part of any urban development. (See Center for Riologic-al Diversity v. California department of Fish and Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.41" 204; 195 Gal. Rptr.3d 247). If the Trustee Agency is prohibited from issuing a take permit, it follows that the City of La Quinta has no authority to issue an approval that has the effect of authorizing the continued "take" of Peninsular bighorn sheep. 6. VioLation of Loth the State and FederaL Endangered Species Acts for allowing take of sheep Peninsular Bighorn Sheep are listed under both the Federal and State Endangered Species Acts, which prohibit take of the species. Section 9 of the Federal ESA and its implementing regulations prohibit the unauthorized "take" of listed species. 16 U.S.C. § 1538(a)(1); 16 U.S.C. § 1533(d); SD C.F.R. § 17.31. "Take„ is defined broadly to include harming, harassing, trapping, capturing, wounding or killing a protected species either directly or by degrading its habitat, See 16 U.S.C. § 1532(19). Taking that is in compliance with the terms and conditions specified in a biological opinion is not considered a prohibited taking under Section 9 of the ESA. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(o)(2). Fish and Game Code Section 2080 prohibits take of endangered or threatened species. "Take" means hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill, or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill. (Fish and Game Code Section 86) 3 2835. At the time of plan approval, the department may authorize by permit the taking of any covered species, including species designated a5 fully protected species pursuant to Sections 3511, 4700, 5050, or 5515, whose conservation and management is provided for in a natural community conservation plan approved by the department. 362 FW City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 23 The City's failure to construct the required fence to protect Peninsular bighorn sheep and the planning Commission's approval of the SDP, which allows further harm to the species, violates the state and federal Endangered Species Acts. 7. Violation of the Public Trust Resources As indicated above, the fish and wildlife resources are held in trust for the people of the state by and through the Department of Fish and Wildlife. The City has no authority to authorize the take of these public resources and is violating its public trust duties by failing to protect an endangered wildlife species and fully protected mammal within its borders. Conclusion The time has come for the City of La Quinta to step up to the plate and fulfil its promises of protecting the Bighorn Sheep by constructing a fence, either temporary or permanent, prior to more sheep deaths occurring. Given the 'history of harm to bighorn sheep, the fact that it is a fully protected mammal and no take is allowed under state law, or under the requirements of the MSHCP and past City Approvals, this project cannot be advanced by any new approval until the fence has been constructed. The City is currently in violation of its obligations under the MSHCP, past approvals and CiQA, The recently approved Site development Permit fails to include provisions to construct the fence. There is no substantial evidence to support any city findings with regard to consistency with the MSHCP, Past City Approvals, Prior Environmental Documents, or federal and state law. The Sierra Club and Center urge you to uphold this appeal and deny the request for approval of a site plan, architecture and Landscaping for a 140 room luxury hotel, 29 hotel -branded residences, a spa, a meeting and conference center, and a shared service facility, and to not make a finding of consistency with Environmental Assessment 2014-1003. 363 Fw� City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 24 Please place this office on the mailing list to receive all future notices about this project. Very truly yours, WORDEN WILLIAMS LLP D. Wayne Brechtel, Esq. dwb a@wordenw LLiams.com DWB:Ig cc: Clients Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (E-mail: tkirk cva .or ) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (E-Mail: paul souzaRfws.g_ov) California Department of Fish and Wildlife (E-Mail: director cz wildlife.ca,go_v) 364 ❑w City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 25 List of Exhibits Documents that are attached to this Letter: Exhibit 1. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Peninsular Bighorn Sheep 2015 Annual Report, Exhibit 2. Bighorn Institute Monthly Updates February to October 2016 Exhibit 3 Letter from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife on February 28, 2014 Exhibit 4 60 Day Notice of Intent to Sue dated September 27, 2016 Project Documents within City Files are incorporated by Reference for the Administrative Record, including, at a minimum, the following: 1. Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Communities Conservation Plan 2. 5ilverRock Resort Specific Plan 3. Development Agreement 2014-1001, Recorded Document DOC #2014-0484106; 4. Purchase, Sale and Development Agreement dated November 19, 2014 5. City of La Quinta Environmental Assessment 2002-453 6. City of La Quinta Environmental Assessment EA 2006-568 7. City of La Quinta Environmental Assessment EA 2014-103 8. Redevelopment Resolution 2002-009 9. City Counci I. Resolution 2006-082 10, City Council Resolution 2006-083 11. City Council Resolution 2014-059 12. Redevelopment Agency Minutes 5-15-2002 365 366 ATTACHMENT 5 CITY OF LA QUINTA MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM PROJECT NAME: The Ranch/SilverRock Resort SCH No.: 1999081020 APPROVAL DATE: May 15th, 2002/July 18th, 2006 The Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared in conformance with Section 21081.6 of the California Environmental Quality Act. It is the intent of this program to (1) verify satisfaction of the required mitigation measures; (2) provide a methodology to document implementation of the required mitigation; (3) provide a record of the Monitoring Program; (4) identify monitoring responsibility; (5) establish administrative procedures for the clearance of mitigation measures; (6) establish the frequency and duration of monitoring; and (7) utilize existing review processes wherever feasible. The following environmental mitigation measures were incorporated in to the approval for this project in order to mitigate potentially significant environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. A completed and signed checklist for each mitigation measure indicates that this mitigation measure has been complied with and implemented, and fulfills the City of La Quinta's monitoring requirements with respect to Assembly Bill3180 (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6). Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Geology The soils at the site Prior to the design and construction of any structural Receipt of site City of La Quinta Prior to the have the potential improvements, a comprehensive design level specific issuance of any for geotechnical evaluations shall be prepared that geotechnical/ grading permits hydroconsolidation includes subsurface exploration and laboratory testing. engineering with the addition of Recommendations for grading/earthwork, surface and plans for the water subsurface drainage, foundations, pavement structural Project sections, and other pertinent geotechnical design considerations shall be formulated and implemented based on the findings of this evaluation. The Project Site All buildings planned as a result of the Proposed Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the would be subject to Project shall be constructed in conformance with the construction issuance of any ground shaking Uniform Building Code, as adopted by the City of La plans building permits during a seismic Quinta. event. Water The project would During construction activities, water trucks are to Field City of La Quinta Ongoing during use potable water acquire water from non -potable water sources, such as inspection construction for dust reclaimed water and/or canal water. suppression instead of reclaimed water 367 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Cumulative use of At such time that non -potable water sources become Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the potable water for available to the project site, the project shall connect landscape and and Coachella issuance of irrigation would to this resource and utilize the non -potable water for project plans Valley Water building permits. incrementally irrigation purposes. to identify the District contribute to the ability to demand on water connect to supplies non -potable water sources in the future Drought tolerant landscaping shall be utilized as a Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the means of reducing water consumption. landscape and issuance of project plans building permits The project will A hydrology master plan shall be prepared for the Receipt of site City of La Quinta Prior to the result in changes to Project Specific Plan. Further, a hydrology study shall hydrology issuance of grading absorption rates, be prepared to support the hydrology master plan. master plan permits drainage patterns, This study shall demonstrate that the project would and study for or the rate and construct storm drainage and hydrologic the Project amount of surface improvements, such as on -site stormwater retention runoff basins, that conform to the City`s master hydrology and storm drain improvement program as well as implement regional and local requirements, policies and programs. Prior to the initiation of any construction activity on the Provide NOI Regional Water Prior to the project site, a Notice of Intent (NOI), Storm Water and Quality Control issuance of any Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and Monitoring verification Board grading permits Plan will be filed with the RWQCB under the general that it was NPDES construction permit. The SWPPP shall include sent to Best Management Practices (BMPs) in compliance with RWQCB the NPDES program requirements. Any existing groundwater wells located on the site that Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the are no longer in use shall be abandoned in accordance construction issuance of any with Federal, State, and local laws and regulations prior plans grading permits to the issuance of building permits. -2- 368 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Design of new roads, golf courses, man-made ponds, Review of site, City of La Quinta Prior to the common landscape areas, storm water basins, and storm issuance of grading other facilities shall incorporate proper engineering drainage and permits controls to channel storm and irrigation runoff into landscape detention/retention facilities that are sized to plans accommodate design year storms and that incorporate filtration systems or other devices to reduce the potential for herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers, and other contaminants to percolate to groundwater or surface water runoff. Water from golf Prior to operation of the golf course, the golf course Receipt of City of La Quinta Prior to the course operation operator shall prepare a Golf Course Management Plan Golf Course issuance of would contain that includes an irrigation plan, water usage plan, and Management operation permit pollutants that chemical management plan in order to reduce, to the Plan impact extent feasible, golf course irrigation runoff and groundwater percolation into the groundwater basin. quality Air Quality Construction Construction equipment shall be phased and operated Review of City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of activity generates in a manner to ensure the lowest construction -related construction grading permit vehicular air quality pollutant emission levels practical, and shall require the management pollutants use of water trucks, temporary irrigation systems and plan other measures which will limit fugitive dust emissions during site disturbance and construction. The following measures shall be implemented to Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the reduce construction related traffic congestion: construction issuance of grading • Configure construction parking to minimize traffic management permit disturbance plan • Minimize obstruction of through -traffic lanes • Provide flag person to ensure safety at construction sites, as necessary • Schedule operations affecting roadways for off- peak traffic hours • Provide rideshare incentives to construction personnel -3- 369 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Emissions of PM10 A PM10 Management Plan for construction operations Review of dust City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of would exceed the shall be submitted prior to the issuance of grading control plan grading permit thresholds of permits. The plan shall include dust management significance during controls such as: construction • Water site and equipment morning and evening • Spread soil binders on site, unpaved roads, and parking areas • Re-establish ground cover on construction site through seeding and watering • Pave construction roads, where appropriate • Operate street -sweepers on paved roads adjacent to site Air quality control measures identified in the Coachella Review of dust City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan shall be control plan grading permit implemented. To reduce VOC emissions associated with architectural Review of City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of coatings, water -based or low-VOC coatings shall be construction building permit used and applied with spray equipment with high management transfer efficiency and/or the need for paints and plan solvents should be reduced by using pre -coated building materials or naturally colored building materials. -4- 370 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Operation of the Timeshare and golf facility construction shall utilize Review of City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of proposed project solar or low emission water heaters to reduce natural construction occupancy permit would result in gas consumption and emissions. and site plans increased air pollutant Timeshare and golf facility construction shall utilize emissions. built-in energy -efficient appliances to reduce energy consumption and emissions. Shade trees shall be provided in close proximity to Timeshare, hotel and golf facility structures to reduce building heating/cooling needs. Timeshare and golf facility construction shall utilize energy -efficient and automated controls for air conditioners to reduce energy consumption and emissions. Timeshare and golf facility construction shall be constructed using special sunlight -filtering window coatings or double -paned windows to reduce thermal gain or loss. Timeshare and golf facility construction shall utilize automatic lighting on/off controls and energy -efficient lighting (including parking areas) to reduce electricity consumption and associated emissions. Timeshare and golf facility construction shall use light- colored roofing materials in residential construction as opposed to dark roofing materials. Bus stops shall be positioned at locations on and Review of City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of adjacent to the site to be determined in coordination construction grading permit with the bus transit service provider that will serve the and site plans project area. Bus stops should be generally located 1/4 mile walking distance from Timeshare units. The golf course shall design on -site circulation plans for Review of City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of clubhouse parking to reduce vehicle queuing. construction grading permit and site plans -5- 371 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Transporta Increases in local A traffic signal shall be installed at the Project entrance Warrant study City of La Quinta Ongoing tion and roadway volumes and Avenue 52, the Project entrance and Jefferson Circulation would Street and at the intersection of Avenue 54 and incrementally Jefferson Street when and if they are warranted. The decrease developer of the site shall be responsible for payment intersection LOS of a fair share of the cost of installing these signals. Biological During construction Efforts shall be made to ensure that all pesticides, Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the Resources and landscaping fungicides, herbicides and fertilizers used during the Construction issuance of grading activities, impacts construction and operation of the Project Site will not and permits to common wildlife be harmful to wildlife. Landscaping would occur plan During construction A construction plan shall be prepared and Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the and operation, demonstrate, to the extent practicable, construction Construction issuance of grading there is a potential activities that emit excessive noise will be avoided plan permits impact to adjacent to the hillside. In addition, during grading and Peninsular bighorn construction activities any blasting or pile -driving near sheep and other the hillside will not occur during the period from Jan. 1 wildlife through June 30th. Potential impact to The landscape plan shall include only plants that are Review of City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of Peninsular bighorn non -toxic to wildlife. All exotic plans such as tamarisk project building permit sheep from and fountain grass are prohibited. Existing trees may landscape increased human remain. plan presence on Project Site -6- 372 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks A mountain toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan Review of City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of has been prepared to protect peninsular big horn construction, grading permit sheep, and other wildlife, from entering the non- landscape and mountainous portion of the site proposed for site plan development. This concept plan illustrates a continuos (Agency shall, buffer to the toe -of -slope in areas where development to the extent could occur adjacent to the mountain edge. The practical, concept plan delineates the location, acreage and widen the native plant species envisioned for the mitigation area. narrowest This plan shall be incorporated into the project design points of the and shall be subject to review by the City prior to the buffer areas issuance of grading permits. A copy of this mountain to minimize toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan is available the impacts for review at the City of La Quinta Community on the hillside) Development Department. If Bighorn Sheep enter onto the Project Site, an 8-foot The Agency City of La Quinta Ongoing fence (or the functional equivalent) between the shall development and the hillside shall be constructed. The guarantee to gaps should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less. If pay determined necessary, the City shall construct the design and temporary fencing while permanent fencing is construction constructed. The fence shall not contain gaps in which costs for the Bighorn Sheep can be entangled. If the Agency transfer fencing, and or disposes of any of the property adjacent to the that if the hillside, the Agency shall reserve an easement sufficient property for the construction of fencing if needed in the future. is transferred, it shall require that the subsequent owner bond or posts sufficient security for the completion of the fence should it arise in the future. -7- 373 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Dogs shall not be permitted to be loose within the Review of City of La Quinta Ongoing project area, and shall be kept away from the hillside landscape and areas through appropriate signage and fencing, where signage plan applicable. Access into the hillside area from the site will be Review of site City of La Quinta, Prior to issuance of discouraged through the use of signs or barricades, if and signage CDFG, USFWS occupancy permit necessary, unless the access is provided as part of a trail plan system that is approved by the USFWS and CDFG. There is a potential The final design of the project shall insure that road and Review of site City of La Quinta Prior to the impact from driveways are designed to minimize headlight shine and issuance of grading nighttime light on from vehicles onto the hillside. construction permit wildlife plan There is a potential In all areas adjacent to the hillsides, non -glare glass Review of site City of La Quinta Prior to the impact from glare shall be used in new construction. Exterior building and issuance of and exterior lights shall not shine on the hillside. Exterior lighting construction building permit lighting on wildlife shall be kept at the safest possible minimum intensity plan and aimed away from the hillside. All swimming pools located on the Project Site shall be Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the fenced pursuant to City regulations. construction issuance of grading plan permit Potential impact to Prior to any construction or site preparation activities Verification of City of La Quinta, Prior to the mesquite hummock that would impact the 3.4 acres of mesquite hummock, receipt of CDFG issuance of grading habitat the agency or project developer shall enter into a financial permit Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU) with CDFG and security an appropriate non-profit organization whose purpose instrument is to acquire and manage land for the purpose of and copy of protecting special status plants and wildlife. This MOU the MOU shall provide the organization chosen the financial resources necessary to purchase and manage 3.4 acres of mesquite hummock in the Willow Hole area or in another area where the habitat is contiguous and large preserves already protect much of this habitat type. The exact location and cost shall be determined through consultation with CDFG and the selected organization. -8- 374 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Potential impact to Prior to the commencement of on -site grading, a 404 Receipt of City of La Quinta, Prior to the areas under the permit shall be obtained, if legally required, for required CDFG, ACOE issuance of grading jurisdiction of the alteration of areas under the ACOE jurisdiction. In permits permit ACOE and the CDFG addition, if development activities are to take place within streambeds or drainages under the jurisdiction of the CDFG, a streambed alteration agreement shall first be obtained, if legally required. Hazards Exposure to Prior to the demolition or renovation of the on -site Proof that a City of La Quinta Prior to the asbestos is a single family residence, asbestos containing materials qualified issuance of significant impact (ACM) shall be removed in accordance with current demolition demolition permit regulatory guidelines. team has been retained Noise Construction noise Between May 1 and September 30, all construction Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the would impact local activities on the project site shall only occur between construction issuance of grading residents and the hours of 6:00 AM and 7:00 PM Monday through plans permit sensitive receptors Friday, and from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturday, and shall be prohibited on Sundays and public holidays. Between October 1 and April 30, all construction activity on the project site shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday, and from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturday, and shall be prohibited on Sundays and public holidays. All operational activities of the Project shall also be subject to the Noise Ordinance of the City as well. All construction equipment operating in the planning Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the area shall be fitted with well -maintained functional construction issuance of grading mufflers to limit noise emissions. plans permit, ongoing throughout construction To the greatest extent feasible, earth moving and Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the hauling routes shall be located away from existing construction issuance of grading residences. plans permit The design, selection and placement of the mechanical Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the equipment for various buildings shall include construction issuance of consideration of the potential noise impact they may plans building permit have on uses within the development site. -9- 375 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Silencers and/or barriers shall be provided where Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the necessary at outdoor equipment, such as cooling construction issuance of towers, air cooled condensers and refrigeration plans building permit compressors/condenser units, and at the air intake and discharge openings for building ventilation systems. Public The proposed The Riverside County Fire Department, in its review of Review of site Riverside County Prior to the Services project would new development proposals, shall evaluate project and landscape Fire Department issuance of grading incrementally plans and the Department's ability to provide proper plan and City of La permit increase demand fire protection. This review shall include, but shall not Quinta for service on the be limited to, internal circulation, project directories, Riverside County street names, and numbering systems. New Fire Department developments shall comply with all City and Fire Department standards. The proposed The Riverside County Sheriff's Department shall review Review of site Riverside County Prior to the project would new development proposals in order to evaluate and landscape Sheriff issuance of grading incrementally project plans and the Department's ability to provide plan Department and permit increase demand adequate police protection. This review should City of La Quinta for service on the include, but not be limited to internal circulation, Riverside County project directories, street names, and numbering Sheriff Department systems. New developments shall comply with all established City and Sheriff standards. Utilities The project would The most efficient furnaces, water heaters, pool Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the and result in an heaters and other equipment that use natural gas shall construction issuance of Service incremental be used in project construction. The use of kitchen plan building permits Systems increase in appliances that use natural gas and alternative, electrical demand renewable energy sources, including solar and wind turbine technologies shall also be used to the greatest extent feasible. Title 24 of the California Administrative Code, which Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the addresses energy conservation in all proposed uses construction issuance of shall be strictly enforced in project design and plan building permits construction. The use of septic All planned uses shall be connected to the city-wide Review of Coachella Valley Prior to issuance of systems in the City sewer system. construction Water District grading permit could result in plan potential impacts -10- 376 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Any existing or historic septic systems located on the Review of Coachella Valley Prior to issuance of site shall be abandoned in accordance with Federal, construction Water District and grading permit State, and local laws and regulations prior to the plan City of La Quinta issuance of building permits. The incremental A recycling program shall be developed for all Receipt of City of La Quinta Prior to the increase in solid proposed uses. Recycling provisions for commercial recycling issuance of waste generation and business establishments should include separate program occupancy permit could result in recycling bins. Items to be recycled at commercial potential impacts establishments may include white paper, computer legal paper, cardboard, glass and aluminum cans. Professional landscaping services from companies Verification City of La Quinta Prior to the which compost green waste shall be utilized. that a issuance of qualified occupancy permit landscaping service has been retained The incremental The Projects fair share of public utilities, infrastructure Verification of City of La Quinta Prior to the demand from the and improvements required to properly service the receipt of issuance of grading project on utility proposed uses shall be determined through financial permit systems could consultation with the City Department of Public Works security result in potential and paid prior to the issuance of grading permits. instrument. impacts Aesthetics The project area is Landscape designs and materials that complement the Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the adjacent to a scenic native desert environment shall be utilized in project landscape and issuance of grading area. Development design and construction. design plans permit would alter the aesthetic nature of the area Overhead utility lines shall be undergrounded to the Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the greatest extent possible through the establishment of design and Public Works and issuance of grading an undergrounding program and guidelines subject to site plans City Engineer permit the review of the City Engineer and Public Works Department. Signage shall be limited to the locations, sizes, and Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the maintenance requirements necessary to provide design plan issuance of grading functional identification. permit -11- 377 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Safe, convenient vehicular and pedestrian circulation, Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the screened outdoor storage/loading and other unsightly landscape and issuance of areas, protected and enhanced outdoor seating areas, design plans building permit appropriate lighting levels, limited signage, and landscaping designs that preserve and enhance visual resources shall be included in the design of any commercial area on the Project Site. Development proposed along designated scenic Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the highways, roadways and corridors shall be reviewed for landscape and issuance of grading compatibility with the natural and built environments design plans permit to assure maximum viewshed protection and pedestrian and vehicular activity. All grading and development proposed within scenic Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the viewsheds, shall be regulated to minimize adverse landscape and issuance of grading impacts to these viewsheds. All grading, development design plans permit and landscaping plans shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. The project would Outdoor lighting shall be limited to the minimum Review of City of La Quinta, Prior to the introduce new height, number of fixtures, and intensity needed to design and Riverside County issuance of sources of light and provide sufficient security and identification in each site plans Sheriff building permit glare that would development, making every reasonable effort to Department alter the existing protect the community's night skies. nighttime environment Cultural There is potential During any ground altering activities associated with Verification City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of Resources for discovery of project grading or construction, including demolition of that a grading permit unidentified existing modern structures and facilities, the project qualified subsurface cultural area shall be monitored by a qualified archaeological historical resources during monitor. The monitor shall have the authority to halt consultant has future ground any activities impacting potentially significant cultural been retained altering activities resources until the resources can be evaluated for significance and cleared or mitigated. The monitoring program shall also include consultation with the local Native American representatives (e.g., Torres -Martinez and/or Morongo Reservations). -12- 378 mw� VANtoo Z; lAlijo eraq�7 -AIR Wy lit EERY fa W, eA 71 44j jo AjAia, M 1, �Jl Wolin 7 04 J* , kri-n-I zi; Wilt gift'. MOM MEN hZ _7 1 ton Ol 40 L Q., IRWIN. 380 ATTACHMENT 7 CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL 2016-0004 SRR SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 Appeal Condition of Approval CC-1 A. City Council Authority. This condition to modify the original decision of the Planning Commission for Site Development Permit 2016-0005 is binding on the City pursuant to its police power and applicant pursuant to Section 9.200.120(D)(6) of the La Quinta Municipal Code and shall take effect immediately upon its adoption as part of the Appeal of Planning Commission Decision, Case No. Appeal 2016-0004 (Administrative Appeal). This condition is incorporated into the approval for Site Development Permit 2016-005 by this reference, and all other conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission for Site Development Permit 2016-0005 remain in full force and effect. B. Intent. The intent of this condition is to protect Peninsular Big Horn Sheep ferfrom impacts related to the approximately 525 acres of property known as The SilverRock Resort pursuant to the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Communities Conservation Plan (MSHCP), the Mitigation Monitoring Program included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Addendum for the SilverRock Resort Specific Plan (SRR Mitigation Measures), that certain Development Agreement dated November 19, 2014, by and between the SilverRock Development Company, LLC (Developer) and the City (the DA), and that certain Purchase, Sale, and Development Agreement dated November 19, 2014, by and between Developer and the City (the PSDA). - C. Immediate Construction of Temporary Fencing. Within 15 days after the decision of the hearing of the Administrative Appeal, the City shall solicit bids for the construction of temporary fencing:, and within 45 days of the bid solicitation, award a contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Within 21 days after the award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, construction of the temporary fencing shall commence. The completion of construction for the temporary fencing shall be as soon as possible after commencing construction, not to exceed a period of 30 days for total construction. Prior to the issuance of any grading, demolition, construction, or building permit, the construction of the temporary fencing shall be completed. For purposes of this condition, "temporary fencing" or "temporary fence" means an 8-foot high fence between the SilverRock Resort development and hillside as identified in the SilverRock Resort Fence Location Site Plan attached as Exhibit "A" to this condition and incorporated by reference (Fencing Site Plan). The temporary fencing shall have gaps that should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less, and shall not contain gaps in which Big Horn Sheep can be entangled. If and/or when the City transfers or disposes of any of the SilverRock Resort property adjacent to the hillside to the applicant, the City shall reserve an easement, and the applicant shall grant an easement, sufficient for the construction and maintenance of the temporary fencing until such time as the permanent fencing or functional equivalent (as described below) is completed. The temporary fencing on City -owned property at SilverRock Resort shall be maintained by the City and on Developer -owned property shall be maintained by Developer until such time as the permanent fencing or functional equivalent is completed. 698/015610-0065 381 10413596.1 a12/19/16 D. Construction of Permanent Fencing or Functional Equivalent. Prior to the issuance of a "grand opening" of the SilverRock Resort as improved pursuant to the DA and PSDA, construction of the permanent fencing or functional equivalent shall be completed. For purposes of this condition, "permanent fencing or functional equivalent" or "permanent fence" means an 8-foot high fence or other barrier that prevents Big Horn Sheep from accessing SilverRock Resort, constructed of durable material or natural landscaping elements approved by t-4eU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and Coachella Valley Conservation Commission, City and applicant in a location that, upon completion of construction, will be within 1-10 feet of the temporary fence line as identified on the Fencing Site Plan:, unless all approving parties agree to an alternative alignment. The permanent fence shall have gaps that should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less, and shall not contain gaps in which Big Horn Sheep can be entangled. If and/or when the City transfers or disposes of any of the SilverRock Resort property adjacent to the hillside to the applicant, the City shall reserve an easement, and the applicant shall grant an easement, sufficient for access to nni-I (if ReceSSGr, construction of -and maintenance of) the permanent fence. The permanent fence on City -owned property at SilverRock Resort shall be maintained by the City and on Developer -owned property shall be maintained by Developer. For purposes of this condition, "grand opening" of the SilverRock Resort means the opening to the general public of the new resort improvements consisting of the Luxury Hotel, Lifestyle Hotel, Conference and Shared Service Facility, Resort Residential Village, and dwelling unit that are part of the Luxury Branded Residential Development, Lifestyle Branded Residential Development, Promenade Mixed -Use Development, or Resort Residential Village (all as those terms are defined in the PSDA). The anticipated date of the grand opening for reference purposes only is May 2019. E. Periodic Review for Environmental Impacts. After the completion of construction of the temporary fencing and until the completion of construction of the permanent fence, the City and applicant shall coordinate with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and/or Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (collectively, the other governmental agencies) to review the effectiveness of the temporary fencing o-r--and final design of the permanent fencing (or functional equivalent)-.. If the review indicates that fence modifications, such as additional height or reinforcement, are required to protect bighorn sheep, the modifications shall be implemented. If review of environmental impacts advocates for a relocation of the temporary fencing or permanent fencing {or use of some type of functional equivalent) to protect Big Hamfthorn Sheep, tl,nt ro"io,A, and r e I e c a innthe alternative location or method of protecting Bighorn sheep may be considered and used by the City and/or the applicant only if they are consistent with any and nil approvals first approved by_ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and/or Coachella Valley Conservation Commission. F. Enforcement. This "CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL 2016- 0004, SRR SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 ("Appeal Condition") may be enforced by the Appellants Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity. Enforcement shall be limited to an action in Superior Court to compel performance. -2- EXHIBIT "A" FENCE SITE PLAN (Attached) 383 ATTACHMENT 7 - DCHIBITA Attachment A: SilverRock Temporary Chain Link Fence Tradition to CVWD Canal us y i r� e, + j ; e ,L, 41� r V r: r ' � l , :: 'S : , a. '.:.:. `s„_�-µ".. � xx � y r, ,� ., I ��.. r,�'• tF,�i- �Js •,}4,-xi�°i�vr,�w, r jy • LL h 4 s q : •'� . � ' i'I •a •: to T< yy h. t,t .l - r .af y" _ - - ✓iy,x x, t, �' h`; 7,g' Ic K�. x, r,[- 1," -•> $ Y' _jih T ,.s' wt, ' �r �•a' '� Z .M�'i >3Y -:J �, - - i - : (. _ �T�I _ of � �,�''� ate? �� x � ,f � � �• �,,, ;� .r ,R ;3;w � x y 't-.• �. rrJ a �'�� -F, ✓A �� f - ., ,�,,, '�'+..y j±'� r ..„;.. ?"�.s i, • '� 4r" :: f.� '-:?: .fir• • ..ley � 4. yA 'a'fi •r - :: „ rl�t °d, -' AT ..... i... .:. �- . ..�•. •t.a� \<.. ,.. �r' J'.. �, �„ �ai_. '"'j r�l. _ '�' ., '.. �.i�•1 �, .: ,, � �Y,r,•' \ .. .r...i'R ..�- :1 � .�'.., �..f art. .{L `f i 4 G r, ,r'r �' 'IMPORTANT* Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the R�,T source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of the user. 0 632 1,265 Feet REPORT PRINTED ON... 11/22/2016 8:58:09 AM © Riverside County RCIT GIS Legend ❑ Display Parcels roadsanno highways HWY INTERCHANGE INTERSTATE OFFRAMP ONRAMP USHWY i-i counties cities hydrographylines waterbodies Lakes Rivers Notes Approximately 6,300 lineal feet 384 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS December 20, 2016 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING ORDINANCE NO. 552 AMENDING CHAPTERS 9.60 AND 9.100 OF TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR SPECIAL EVENT REGULATIONS RECOMMENDATION A. Move to take up Ordinance No. 552 by title and number only and waive further reading. B. Move to introduce at first reading, Ordinance No. 552 amending Chapters 9.60 and 9.100 of Title 9 of the Municipal Code. C. Make a finding, included in Ordinance No. 552, that adopting these ordinances is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061 (B)(3) Review of Exemptions - General Rule and is consistent with the previously approved General Plan 2035 Environmental Impact Report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The Council expressed interest in streamlining the City's special event regulations. • Amendments to special event regulations were considered during the December 6, 2016 Council Study Session. FISCAL IMPACT There is no anticipated fiscal impact. RACKGROUNWANALYSIS The Council streamlined the development review and permitting process by adopting the Development Code Tune Up on April 5, 2016. Council requested expanding the Code Tune Up to include special event regulations. These amendments were presented on September 20, 2016, however, Council directed staff to research regulations in neighboring cities and to craft proposals that allow greater flexibility for events in residential districts. Attachment 1 presents a summary of neighboring city regulations and Attachment 2 is a table that summarizes recommended modifications to the City's special event regulations. In summary, the recommendations entail: Base the need for a permit for a residence that is rented with or without compensation with a combination of event characteristics (outdoor amplified music, staging, event lighting, tents, additional parking accommodations, traffic restrictions, 385 etc.) versus the current standard of the number of persons attending an event (a 50 person threshold); permits would be required when holding special events. • Require event permits for short-term vacation rental units when exceeding the permitted maximum occupancy. • Allow a maximum of three special events on a private property in a residential district and reduce the event period to a maximum of three consecutive days. The current standard permits two special events in a calendar year, not to exceed ten consecutive days per event. • Require a major temporary use permit for special events that occur more than three but less than twelve times in a calendar year in residential districts. • Require a conditional use permit for special events that occur twelve or more times in a calendar year in residential districts. Require neighbor notification for special events in residential districts. The proposed modifications for special events in nonresidential districts are as follows: • Require a minor use permit for special events held more than four times in a calendar year in nonresidential districts. Terms for special events may extend beyond a calendar year subject to the conditions of a minor use permit. The current standard limits special events to four times in a calendar year with a temporary use permit. CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION On December 6, 2016, the City Council held a Study Session to review proposed special event regulations. As a result of the Council's discussion and direction, the following should be included in the regulations: Penalties for violation of special event permit requirements and City codes. Staff proposed that a second violation of permit requirements may lead to suspension of any existing permit or pending permit application for 90 days. Third violation shall be cause for automatic revocation of any current or pending application for a temporary use permit, minor use permit, or conditional use permit. Director discretion for special event application deadlines. Staff proposes amendments allowing director discretion for temporary use permit requests within 45 days of an event based on assessment of event characteristics. Staff recommends no change to the 90 review period for major temporary and conditional use permits in residential districts, and minor use permits in nonresidential districts to allow adequate time for Police Department review, a public hearing and any permit appeals. I During the December 6 discussion, the Council expressed concerns regarding overregulating events at private residences. The recommended changes to the special event regulations are designed to address problems that arise when private residences are used for commercial activities - large social events that are staged during music festivals or use of larger homes and properties in residential neighborhoods. It has not been the City's practice to regulate private parties held at residences. The City does not have the desire or the resources to do so. Instead, staffs intent is to offer regulations that mitigate the impact commercial events have on residential neighborhoods and to provide a forum wherein adjacent neighbors are notified of such events and have the opportunity to provide input. ALTERNATIVES The City could recommend additional amendments to the proposed special event regulations or recommend not modifying the existing regulations. Prepared by: Gabriel Perez, Planning Manager Approved by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., Design and Development Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1. Comparison of Coachella Valley City Special Event Standards 2. Table of Recommended Special Event Code Amendments 387 388 ORDINANCE NO. 552 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS 9.60 and 9.100 TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO SPECIAL EVENT REGULATIONS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 20tn day of December 2016, hold a duly noticed public hearing for review of a City -initiated request of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 20016-0004 to modify special event regulations of Chapter of 9.60 and 9.100 of Title 9 (Zoning) of the La Quinta Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 18tn day of October 2016, hold a duly noticed public hearing for review of a City -initiated request of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 20016-0004 and approved Ord. No. 550 to modify Title 9 (Zoning) related to the Zoning and General Plan Consistency of the La Quinta Municipal Code, and recommended consideration of special event regulations at a future City Council public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 201n day of September 2016, hold a duly noticed public hearing for review of a City -initiated request of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 20016-0004 and approved Ordinance No. 547 to modify Title 9 (Zoning) of the La Quinta Municipal Code and the Official Zoning Map; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 9th day of August, 2016, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for review of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to amend Title 9 of the La Quinta Municipal Code and the Official Zoning Map, as identified by Title of this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, subsequent to said Public Hearing, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2016-012 to recommend to the City Council adoption of said zoning text and map amendments; and WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice for this request in The Desert Sun newspaper on December 9, 2016, as prescribed by the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, Title 9 of the Municipal Code contains the chapters that address permitted uses, development standards, development review and permitting procedures; and 389 Ordinance No. 552 Amendment to Title 9 Zoning Adopted: Page 2 of 5 WHEREAS, the proposed zoning text amendments are necessary to provide comprehensive requirements for special events in residential and nonresidential districts in the City of La Quinta, and WHEREAS, the proposed zoning text amendments are necessary to implement the General Plan 2035 adopted by the City Council at their regular meeting on February 19, 2013, and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify adoption of said Zoning Ordinance Amendment: 1. Consistency with General Plan The zoning text amendments are consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan. The proposed amendments are supported by Policy LU-1.2, that all land use decisions shall be consistency with all applicable General Plan policies and programs and shall uphold the right and needs of property owners as well as those of the general public. The amendments are further supported by Policy LU3.1 for preservation of neighborhood character and assure consistent and compatible land use pattern. 2. Public Welfare Approval of the zoning code and map amendments will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. The amendments implement the General Plan 2035 and do not incorporate any changes that affect the regulation and/or provision of public services, utility systems, or other foreseeable health, safety and welfare considerations. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. CHAPTER 9.60 SUPPLEMENTAL RESIDENTIAL REGULATIONS shall be amended as written in Exhibit A attached hereto. SECTION 2. CHAPTER 9.100 SUPPLEMENTAL NONRESIDENTIAL REGULATIONS shall be amended as written in Exhibit A attached hereto. SECTION 3. The proposed zone text amendment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (CEQA) as amended (Resolution 83-63). The zone text amendments are consistent with the previously approved findings of the General Plan 2035 EIR (Environmental Assessment 2012-622) as the proposed amendments implement the goals, policies, and programs of the General Plan. 390 Ordinance No. 552 Amendment to Title 9 Zoning Adopted: Page 3 of 5 SECTION 4. That the City Council does hereby approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2016-0004, as set forth in attached Exhibit "A" for the reasons set forth in this Ordinance. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. SECTION 7. That the City Council does hereby grant the City Clerk the ability to make minor amendments to Exhibit "A" to ensure consistency of all approved text amendments prior to the publication in the La Quinta Municipal Code. SECTION 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held this 20th day of December 2016 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 391 Ordinance No. 552 Amendment to Title 9 Zoning Adopted: Page 4 of 5 ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LA QUINTA ) I, SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No. (enter number) which was introduced at a regular meeting on the (date) day of (month), (year), and was adopted at a regular meeting held on the (date) day of (month), (year), not being less than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof. 392 Ordinance No. 552 Amendment to Title 9 Zoning Adopted: Page 5 of 5 I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the City of La Quinta as specified in the Rules of Procedure adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2014-013. SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California DECLARATION OF POSTING I, SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on , pursuant to Council Resolution. SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 393 394 Exhibit A 9.60.170 Special outdoor events - Residential.. A. Outdee�Special Events. Within residential districts, - or residential areas for property or parcel(s) zoned mixed -use (referred to in this section as "residential district(s)"), special outdoor events shall include, but are not limited to: 1. - -pageants, fairs, carnivals and large athletic events, religious or entertainment events, block parties, and large neighborhood or community gatherings. 2. Events at a privately owned residential dwelling, such as, but not limited to, a single-family detached or multiple -family attached unit, apartment house or complex, condominium, cooperative apartment, duplex, or any portion of such dwellings, rented for compensation or without compensation for the purpose of staging a special event that includes a combination of any two or more of the following characteristics: outdoor amplified music, a stage or staging, event lighting, tents, additional parking accommodations, traffic restrictions, etc -.and other characteristics consistent with larger gatherings that are not consistent with occasional residential oarties or small events. 9.3. Events at a short-term vacation rental unit property or parcel(s) that exceeds the total daytime number of occupants allowed pursuant to Section 3.25.070. B. Standards. Special eutdeer events are permitted in residential districts as indicated in Table 9-1provided -thy, felle „n^ re ,men+ are met -.-with the approval of a temporary use permit or conditional use permit, in accordance with the following: 1. One special event may be norm;++odnot exceed three consecutive days. 2. A minor temporary use permit may be processed and issued if no more than three special events occur at a single-family detached or multiple - family attached unit, short-term vacation rental, apartment house, condominium, cooperative apartment, duplex, or any portion of such dwellings in a calendar year. 3. A major temporary use permit may be processed and the nor;^— eaGh event not to eXGeed three -censecutwFe---days.Events that ec�rissued if more than three tomesna-eatenyear-,-but no n4e�eless than el•euentwelve tomes On Ealendar year may be Permittedspecial events occur at a single-family detached or multiple - family attached unit, short-term vacation rental, apartment house, condominium, cooperative apartment, duplex, or any portion of such dwellings subweGt to the approval of a mawer temporary use norm;+ 395 €4er tsin a calendar year subject to approval at a public hearing of the Director. 4. Special events that occur more than eleven times in a calendar year may be permitted at a single-family detached or multiple -family attached unit. short-term vacation rental. apartment house condominium, cooperative apartment, duplex, or any portion of such dwellings subject to the approval of a conditional use permit at a public hearing of the PlaRnORq Gemmissieqplanning commission in accordance with this section and the municipal code. 5. Appl+sabGgAn application for a minor temporary use permit for special events shall be submitted to the Design and Development Department no later than forty-five (45) days prior to the proposed special event. Ann'onAn application for a major temporary use permit or conditional use permit for special events shall be submitted no later than 90 days Prior to the nrnneserd sneGial event The City Uanaoer or his/her rdesinnee magi allow fnr an annlinatien fnr menial events after e applkatinn rdeadloRe and si isnenrd the anneal rPronerdi Tres after a the annlinatiOR is adequate inrlrdinlY that m Gli�e�m�terJ norLinn and traffi nqaGts eutdoer s h-at n net rent sire b iildinn Hermit issi ianr•e limited or no outdoor amplified MUSiG and nn GORSUmntinn of a'Gehn'ninety (90) days prior to the proposed special event. 6. -The City Manager or his/her designee may allow for an expedited application of a minor temporary use permit, which may be submitted later than the application deadlines set forth in the subsection above, and may suspend the appeal procedures after a decision of the permit is rendered, if the special event will have limited parking and traffic impacts, will not have outdoor tents or other structures that require a building permit, will have limited or no outdoor amplitied music, will not require a permit from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for consumption of alcohol, and the applicant for the special event certifies that these limitations will aDDly and be enforced. 2 396 7. Findinas. The followina findinas shall be made by the decision-makin authority in conjunction with approval of either a minor or major temporary use permit, or conditional use permit: a. The event will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community in the area of the proposed event. b. There is adequate area to conduct the event and to accommodate the anticipated attendance. c. Sufficient parking will be provided for the anticipated attendance. d. Food service operations, medical facilities, solid waste facilities, sewage disposal methods and potable water service have been provided. (Approval by the health officer may be required.) e. Fire protection plans and facilities have been provided to the satisfaction of the fire marshal. f. Security plans and facilities have been provided to the satisfaction of the sheriff. q. Public roadways providing access to the event are capable of accommodating the anticipated traffic volumes in a reasonable and safe manner with minimal disruation to local traffic circulation. -38. Regardless of the number of attendants, activities conducted on property owned by or leased to the city or on public rights -of -way may require an encroachment permit issued by the publiG WO City Manager '�}ory�his/her designee. / /�r� 4The -eve`Tl may be for riGTied ROt to eXGC�eIR GeRs� e days. EyefltSrG6R UGted by a cingI e permittee or group whiGh OGGU m,-r-ioore—th-aR tw+Ge— three —times n a Galencndaryear are ne+ rensidered temporary and shall notbe elieible fer a miner temporary use permit. -5-.P A cash bond or other guarantee as determined by the City Manager or his/her designee for removal of the temporary use and cleanup and restoration of the activity site within seven days of the activity conclusion may be required. 10 Applications for permits or certificates required by ei this section shall be referred by the e;lanninn Dny„ �Design and Development DepartmerE to other affected departments, cities or public agencies as may be appropriate for review and comment. 11.The applicant shall provide evidence that the applicant mailed or delivered written notification of the special event(s) to all property owners shown on the last equalized county assessment roll and all occupants of each dwelling unit within three hundred feet of the proposed special event property. Such notice shall be issued no later 3 397 than fourteen days prior, and completed no more than seven days prior to the special event. The notice shall include: a. The date, time, hours of operation and complete description of all activities for the event as required to be submitted as part of the application b. The name and twenty-four hour contact phone number of the local contact person for the property and the Police Department. 1. 12. Signs for the -pageants, fairs, carnivals and large athletic events, religious or entertainment events, block parties, large neighborhood or community gatheringseveet shall be allowed as follows: a. Maximum of one temporary banner per street frontage, not to exceed thirty-two square feet. b. Maximum one temporary portable sign on- or off -site on private property, not to exceed fifty-five square feet. c. Maximum thirty off -site temporary directional signs, nine square feet in area, subject to the provisions of Section 9.160.060, subsections C through H with the exception of subsection E. d. Maximum fifteen bunting signs, with maximum size to be approved by the City Manager or his/her designee. e. Posting period, locations and related details shall be as approved in the temporary use permit for the event. f. Other signs and advertising devices, such as pennants, flags and A - frame signs are prohibited. 13. Related issues, including but not limited to police and security, food and water supply, consumption of alcohol, use of tents and canopies, fugitive dust control, sanitation facilities, medical services, noise, signage, fire protection and traffic control, shall be satisfactorily addressed by the applicant, as required by the City Manager or his/her designee, sheriff, fire chief or health officer in their administration of other city codes. Such other codes may require the applicant to obtain permits such as building, electrical, County Hhealth, California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and tent permits. (Ord. 99 § 1 (part), 1997• Ord 29 2 § 1 (part) � 996; Ord. 284 § 1 /Exh O1 (par �-QQ-�QQp��a�rrT-�� , Ord. : cav�pur` (part), . v �v ,�rc� �--s--rT T-�-c�--spur , �7 14.A permit may be issued for special events in nonresidential districts or at nonresidential areas of mixed -use property or parcel(s) pursuant to Section 9.100.130 of this code. G-.C. Violations. A violation of this section may include any of the following: 4 398 1. Permit Limitation. The City Manager or his/her designee may summarily deny, suspend, or revoke any current or pending temporary use permit, minor use permit, or conditional use permit pursuant to the provisions set forth in Section 2.04.100 (Appeals to Council) of Chapter 2.04 for any or all of the following: (a) A violation by the applicant, occupants, responsible party, owner(s) or the owner's authorized aqent or representative of any of the conditions of approval or any provisions in the municipal code; (b) The applicant, occupants, responsible party, owner(s) or the owner's authorized agent or representative performs activities described in the application for the temporary use permit, minor use permit, or conditional use permit in a manner that poses a threat to the public health and safety, endangers the preservation of property, engages in activities outside the scope of the activities described in the application, or fails to timely reimburse the city for costs associated with enforcement of the conditions of approval or any provisions in the municipal code. Additionally, for any violation under this section or other provisions of the municipal code resulting from a special event at a short term vacation rental, the City Manager or his/her designee may summarily deny, suspend, or revoke the short term vacation rental permit and licenses related to the operation thereto. 2. Notice of Violation. The city may issue a notice of violation to any occupant, responsible party, owner(s) or the owner's authorized agent or representative, pursuant to Section 1.01.300 (Notices —Service) of the municipal code, if there is any violation of this section or any other provisions of the municipal code, caused or maintained by any of the above parties. The City Manager or his/her designee may suspend any existing permit or pending permit application for a period of 90 days after a second violation of any of the conditions of approval from an applicable permit or any provisions of the municipal code. A third violation shall be cause for automatic revocation by the City Manager or his/her designee of any current or pending application for a temporary use permit, minor use permit, or conditional use permit. 3. Administrative Citation. The city may issue an administrative citation to any occupant, responsible party, owners, or the owner's authorized agent or representative, pursuant to Chapter 1.09 (Administrative Citation) of the municipal code, if there is any violation of this section or other provisions of the municipal code, caused or maintained by any of the above parties. Nothing in this section shall preclude the city from 5 399 issuing an infraction citation upon the occurrence of the same offense on a separate day. 4. Misdemeanor Citation. The city may issue a misdemeanor citation to any occupant, responsible party, owner(s) or the owner's authorized agent or representative. Every violation of this section or other provisions of the municipal code is a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars or imprisonment in the County Jail for not more than six months or by both such fine and imprisonment. Every violation of the conditions of approval of a temporary use permit, minor use permit, or conditional use permit is a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars or imprisonment in the County Jail for not more than six months or by both such fine and imprisonment. 5. Additional Conditions. A violation of any provision of this section or other provisions of the municipal code by any of the occupants, responsible party, owner(s) or the owner's authorized agent or representative shall authorize the city manager, or designee, to impose additional conditions on temporary use, minor use, or conditional use permit to ensure that any potential additional violations are avoided. 6. Public Nuisance. It shall be a public nuisance for any person to commit, cause or maintain a violation of this section or other provisions of the municipal code, which shall be subject to the provisions of Section 1.01.250 (Violations public nuisances) of Chapter 1.01 (Code Adopted). 9.100.1340 Temporary Special AutdeaFevents - Nonresidential.. A. Tern Events. Within Nonresidential districts, -or nonresidential areas for property or parcel(s) zoned mixed -use (referred to in this section as "nonresidential district(s)"), special eotdoer events shall include, but are not limited to: pageants, fairs, carnivals, and large athletic, religious or entertainment events, andblock parties, large neighborhood or community gatherings in temporary fonilitie . Such eventsaGtivities may be permitted in rn Ge with fellOWORg provisions nonresidential districts pursuant to this section.-- B. Standards. Approval of a temporary use permit or minor use permit shall be reauired for anv soecial event in a nonresidential district. as Drovided in this section, 1. A temporary use permit governing special events shall be subject to the following: 0 400 a. One special event may not exceed ten consecutive days. b. A temporary use permit may be processed and issued if the event has 50 or more person and no more than four special events occur at the event location within a calendar year. c. A temporary use permit shall be approved by the Community Development Dire„+nr City Manager or his/her designee for gatherings of fifty or more. --The temporary use permit may be referred to the planning commission as a business item at the discretion of the City Manager or his/her designee. 2. Special events that occur more than four times in a calendar vear may be permitted subject to the approval of a minor use permit in accordance with this section and the municipal code. a. The term for special events beyond a calendar year may be established by the minor use permit. b. A minor use permit shall be approved by the City Manager or his/her designee. The minor use permit may be referred to the planning commission as a business item at the discretion of the City Manager or his/her designee. c. Notwithstanding the general requirement for special events to obtain a minor use permit pursuant to this section, fine art and craft shows may be approved for ten calendar days in each month, except during city sponsored fine art events, by a temporary use permit pursuant to this ,Prfinn Applications for permits or certificates required by this section shall be referred by the Community Development Direr++nrCity Manager or his/her designee to other affected city departments or other public agencies for review and comment. C. G,D. Findings. The following same findings set forth in Section 9.60.170(B)(7) (or successor subsection in that sections shall be made by the decision -making authority in conjunction with approval of a temporary use permit or minor use permit under this section: 401 C. SeC� ili�S have been provided to satisfadinn of v. rites �v�.crr�rv-v�crcc�c� rrrra�ccrvrrvr the sheriffr. 7 Di blip readways nrn�rvv ding aGGess to the e'VCRt are Gapable of manner with minimal disruption to Inrnl traffic GirG latinn Activities conducted on property owned by or leased to the city and public road rights -of -way may require an encroachment permit issued by the n„hli^ work Design and Development Ddirector. E—.-An The eveftshall—Ret eXGenedteR GenseGUtwe days. reGurr mere tha feur 1R aa GaIeRdar year are not eARsdered t nerani and art and Graft shews may be approved fGF teR GaleRdar days on eaGh shall not be eligible fer approval URder this SeGtOE)R. Previded hewever, fiRe designee F. aAn application for a temporary use permit for special events shall be submitted to the Design and Development Department no later than forty-five (45) days prior to the proposed special event, and an application for a minor use permit for special events shall be submitted no later than ninety (90) days prior to the proposed special event, unless the City Manager or his/her designee determines additional time is necessary to review and make the required findings for the special event permit application, in which case the City Manager or his/her designee shall notify the applicant of the modified deadline for submitting an application. G. The City Manager or his/her designee may allow for an expedited application of a temporary use permit, which may be submitted later than the application deadlines set forth in the subsection above, and may suspend the appeal procedures after a decision of the permit is rendered, if the special event will have limited parking and traffic impacts, will not have outdoor tents or other temporary or permanent structures that require a building permit, will have limited or no outdoor amplified music, will not require a permit from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for consumption of alcohol, and the applicant for the special event certifies that these limitations will apply and be enforced. l= H 402 A cash bond or other guarantee as determined by the City Manager or his/her designee for removal of the temporary use and cleanup and restoration of the activity site to its condition before the event within seven days of the event's conclusion shall be required. r- Related issues, including but not limited to police and security, food and water supply, consumption of alcohol, use of tents and canopies, fugitive dust control, sanitation facilities, medical services, noise, signage, fire protection and traffic control, shall be satisfactorily addressed by the applicant, as required by the City Manager or his/her designee; sheriff, fire chief or health officer in their administration of other city codes. Such other codes may require the applicant to obtain permits such as building, electrical, County Health, California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and tent permits. A_. Other gliGahle permits si inh as building, electrical health and tent permits shall he ehtained by the applicant J. Signs for the event shall be allowed as follows: Maximum of one temporary banner per street frontage, not to exceed thirty-two square feet. Maximum one temporary portable sign on- or off -site on private property, not to exceed fifty-five square feet. Maximum thirty off -site temporary directional signs, nine square feet in area, subject to the provisions of Section 9.160.060, subsections C through H with the exception of subsection E. 3. 4—.Maximum fifteen bunting signs, with maximum size to be approved by the Community Development Direrter City Manager or his/her designee. 4. Posting period, locations and related details shall be as approved in the temporary use permit for the event. Other signs and advertising devices, such as pennants, flags, A -frame signs, are prohibited. (Ord. 338 § I (Ex . ), 000: Ord 293 § I (part rra�. .�v �vvv—.�rcr—cv.� 4996i Ord.z84 § 1 (Exh, o) (part), 1996) A0 i�vrrnn K. Violations. A violation of this section shall be governed by the same violation provisions in Section 9.60.170(C) (or successor subsection in that section). M 403 404 ATTACHMENT 1 Comparison of Coachella Valley Special Event Standards Dance Permit also required for any special event including a dance floor and Cathedral City No 60 days_ requires finger printing with Dept. of Justice. Events with over 100 attendees also require Completed Riverside County Planning Coachella Yes 4 weeks Department Event documents w/approved Signatures Indian Wells Yes 30 days Written HOA approval: No PublicHearing required for Event Permit Application. No special events allowed near venue during festival weekends. Indio Yes 45 clays All applications reviewed by SEPT team (special events planningteam). Gatherings of 50 or more La Quinta Yes No Deadline 2 Max. Events in Residential District,4 Max. Events in Nonresidential District Time Based on Event Size Targeted to Commercial Districts Palm Desert Yes (no specific timeframe) Requires additional Temporary Entertainment Permit application Event House: 30 days No amplified sound allowedoutdoors. Palm Springs Yes Special Eve nt: 6 months Must notify neighbors. Permit Th res h o I d . Am p I if jed sound, stage, lighting, parking issues, 10x 10 tent. Rancho Mirage Yes 30 days Must notify neighbors. *Existing Requirements 405 M. ATTACHMENT 2 Special Event Recommended Requirements- La Quinta RESIDENTIAL ZONES NONRESIDENTIAL ZONES Residential Homes (HOA and Non HOA) Individual On -going Events Events (1-4 (5 or more Small 1-3 Special Events 4-11 Special Events On -Going (12+ Gatherings Events) Events) events) Permit No permits TUP (Minor) TUP (Major) CUP TUP (Minor) MUP Permit Threshold Outdoor Rented & Outdoor Rented & Outdoor 12 or more 50 or more 50 or more people amplified amplified music, Staging, amplified music, Events per year people music, etc. Staging, etc. Staging, etc exceeding occupancy of exceeding occupancy a short-term vacation of a short-term rental vacation rental Fees $0 $250 $1,976 $5,827 $250 $250 Noticing N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Requirements Outreach Public Hearing Public Hearing Outreach Public Hearing Noise LQMC LQMC LQMC LQMC LQMC LQMC Parking Plan N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Required? Insurance Req. N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes City Depts -Code -Police -Police -Police -Police -Police Involved Compliance -Code -Code -Code -Code -Code -Planning -Planning -Planning -Planning -Planning -Fire -Fire -Fire -Fire -Fire -Risk Management -Risk Management -Risk Management -Risk Management -Risk Management Governing Code N/A 9.60.170 9.60.170 9.60.170 9.100.140 1.100.140 Section Public Hearing No No Yes (Director) Yes (P.C.) No Yes (P.C.) Deadline to Apply? N/A 45 days maximum 90 days 90 days 45 days 90 days Number of event N/A 3 events 4-11 events as 12 or more as 4 Events Subject to MUP restrictions per permitted by MUP permitted by year CUP Number of day N/A Three consecutive days Subject to MUP Subject to CUP Ten Subject to MUP restrictions per consecutive event days 407 Definition of Terms (Special Event Recommend Requirements Table) Deadline to Apply: The date a special event application is required to be submitted to the City for consideration. The proposed deadlines are proposed to accommodate time for City departments/divisions and outside agencies to review applications and allow for time for an appeals process for special events. Governing Code Section: Section from the La Quinta Municipal Code. HOA: Homeowners Association Insurance: Requirements that proof of insurance be provided for the special event L MC: La Quints Municipal Code Noise: Permitted noise levels for special events Number of event restrictions per year: The number of special events that can be held in a calendar year. Number of day restrictions per year: The number of days a special event can be held in a calendar year. Parking Plan: A plan provided by the special event applicant that demonstrates parking accommodations with minimal or no impact to the surrounding properties, residents, or businesses. Permits: CUP (Conditional Use Permit): a discretionary permit that authorizes a specific use on a specific property subject to compliance with all terms and conditions imposed on the entitlement. Uses requiring a conditional use permit have moderate to significant potential for adverse impacts on surrounding properties. MUP (Minor Use Permit): a discretionary permit that authorizes a specific use on a specific property subject to compliance with all terms and conditions imposed on the permit. Uses requiring a minor use permit have low to moderate potential for adverse impacts on surrounding properties, residents, or businesses. TUP (Temporary Use Permit): is a permit for a land use established for a specified period of time, which use is discontinued at the end of such specified time. Small Gatherings: Events organized by the property owner or occupant such as birthday parties, barbecues, and celebrations. Vacation Rental Homes: privately owned residential dwelling as a short-term vacation rental unit pursuant to the short-term vacation rental requirements of Chapter 3.25, and which incorporates by consolidation a transient occupancy permit and a business license. 408 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 3 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS December 20, 2016 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS AND A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND CERTIFYING THE VILLAGE BUILD -OUT PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT; AND, INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING ORDINANCE NO. 553 AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE BUILD -OUT PLAN FOR THE LA QUINTA VILLAGE, INCLUDING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ASSOCIATED THERETO RECOMMENDATION A. Adopt Resolution 2016- , adopting Findings and a Statement of Overriding Consideration, and certifying the Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2015101019). B. Move to take up Ordinance No. 553 by title and number only and waive further reading. C. Move to introduce at first reading, Ordinance No. 553 amending Title 9 of the Municipal Code. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The City has been actively pursuing development within the La Quinta Village. • A Village Build -out Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (Attachment 1) was developed to facilitate future development in the Village. • Village Zoning Text Amendments are proposed to provide greater flexibility from the existing height, density, and parking requirements FISCAL IMPACT It is anticipated that the Village Build -Out Plan (Plan) will facilitate future development, increase tourism and sales tax revenues. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Development in the Village has been a long-term focus of the City. The City Council directed staff to develop a build -out plan to facilitate development. The EIR assumes build -out will take a number of years, and would coincide with the General Plan build -out of 2035. The Plan is not a development proposal but rather an estimate of potential development that could occur if the Village is developed per the General Plan land use plan as shown in ,I• Attachment 2. The Plan area encompasses all lands designated as Village Commercial, as well as the Civic Center and lands on the north side of Calle Tampico. These additional lands were included to provide connections from the Village core to the major roadways of Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive. Build -out land use assumptions are shown in Attachment 3. As shown in Table 1, development in the Plan area currently consists of approximately 136.7 acres, and about 152,000 square feet of commercial (retail and office), 284 dwelling units, and 290 hotel rooms/casitas. Table 1 Existing Conditions in the Project Area Land Use Dwelling Units Square Feet Acres Residential Single Family 33 0.99 Multi -Family 251 14.01 Commercial Commercial 151,925 85.90 Other Land Uses Hotels + Casitas 290 11.75 Civic Center 18.82 School 12.74 Park 6.50 Vacant 20.18 Total 284 du and 290 hotel rooms 151,925 square feet 136.74 acres Source: City of La Quinto Village Build -Out Plan Land Use Data, August 2015. Table 2 identifies the build -out potential developed as a result of the analysis. Table 2 Existing and Potential New Development in the Project Area Existing Potential Existing Non- New Non - Land Use Acres Residential New Residential Residential TOTAL Units (DU) Residential Square Feet Square Feet Units (DU) Vacant Land 20.70 -- 436 -- 288,330 -- Land with the Potential for 30.20 -- 794 12,400 511,456 -- Redevelopment Existing Developed Properties with no 85.90 -- -- 139,525 -- -- Change in Land Use or Increased Density 1481 DU, 251 DU 290 Total 136.74 +290 hotel 1,230 du 151,925 799,786 hotel/ casita, acres rooms & square feet square feet 960,711 casitas square feet Source: City of La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Land Use Data, August 2015. Notes: 1. Residential unit count includes existing residences 410 Zoning Text Amendments Based on the Plan, Zoning Text Amendments were developed. Summarized below, these amendments facilitate the envisioned intensity of development by: Allowing residential densities of up to 30 units per acre north of Calle Tampico, and 25 units per acre south of Calle Tampico. Encouraging use of the mixed -use overlay on commercial land with incentives and less stringent development standards to encourage this type of development. Reducing current parking requirements by 50%. Circulation, Parking and Drainage Important for the success of the Plan are circulation into and through the area, a comfortable pedestrian experience, and parking for visitors, businesses and residents. The analysis therefore considered three components: First, as shown in Attachment 4, the EIR considered the General Plan build -out traffic analysis and traffic calming proposals that would improve the pedestrian experience while facilitating traffic flow. The traffic calming proposals include mini -roundabouts, mid -block crosswalks and sidewalks. Intersections will operate at acceptable levels after roadway improvements and other mitigation measures are implemented, however, three roadway segments (Washington Street between Avenue 48 and Eisenhower; Calle Tampico between Avenida Bermudas and Desert Club Drive; and Calle Tampico between Desert Club Drive and Washington Street) would not meet General Plan 2035's standard level of service (Level of Service D) (see Attachment 5). The EIR requires that the City monitor actual conditions and implement strategies as conditions warrant. Second, the Plan includes provisions to reduce parking spaces. The EIR outlines parking management strategies that require ongoing staff monitoring, and include satellite parking with shuttle service, shared parking, future public parking structures and other strategies. Third, the City's storm water retention standards require a basin (either above or below ground) that accommodates ten-year storm event runoff and many small parcels do not have the land area to accommodate this requirement. Mitigation measure HWQ-3 identifies the City as responsible party to alleviate this situation by enlarging the Calle Tampico storm drain and requiring project applicants to pay development impact fees for drainage improvements. CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION On December 6, 2016, the City Council held a Study Session to review the Plan, EIR and the Zone Text Amendments. As a result of the Council's discussion and direction, the following was concluded: The maximum building height in the Plan area should be limited to 45 feet. Over time, the Council can consider whether that height limit should change. This change has been made to the attached Zone Text Amendments. Staff has drafted an 411 alternative standard for Council consideration that provides Planning Commission discretion for building heights proposed above 45 feet in height to a maximum of 60 feet with conditional use permit approval. • Drainage improvement plans and costs in the Plan area should first be developed based on existing analysis. Alternatives for funding, including development impact fees, should be considered once costs are known, and all financing options are understood. • Undergrounding of utility lines should continue on a case by case basis. The site development permit replaces the village use permit for development approvals. Staff requests the Council allow the decision -making authority to grant site development permit extensions on a case by case basis and lift the current limitations to two, two-year time extensions. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At its meeting of November 22, 2016, the Planning Commission reviewed the Plan, Zone Text Amendments and the EIR, and unanimously recommended to the City Council that Findings and a Statement of Overriding Consideration be prepared; that the City Council certify the EIR; and that the Council adopt the Zone Text Amendments. PUBLIC REVIEW This project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on December 9, 2016. To date no comments have been received. Any additional written comments received will be handed out at the Planning Commission hearing. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project was reviewed under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Design and Development Department determined the application is a "project" as defined by CEQA. The City determined the potential increases in intensity could result in significant impacts. As a result, the City undertook the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH #2015101019). The EIR was circulated to responsible agencies and interested parties for a period of 45 days. Comments were received from Coachella Valley Water District, Imperial Irrigation District, the Riverside County Airport Commission and the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians. Their comments, and the City's responses, are included in the attached Final Environmental Impact Report. The EIR analyzed the potential impacts of the project, and determined most impacts could be reduced to less than significant levels. Impacts associated with air quality, greenhouse gas emissions and traffic and circulation cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level. The Council must consider Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations as part of its review of the proposed project and certification of the EIR. 412 ALTERNATIVES The Council could recommend not modifying existing Village standards, but staff does not recommend this alternative as it would be contrary to the goals of the Village Build -Out Plan and the General Plan. Prepared by: Nicole Criste, Consulting Manager Approved by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., Design and Development Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1. Final Village Build -Out Plan EIR 2. Build -Out Plan Land Use Designations 3. Land Use Assumptions 4. Circulation Plan 5. Levels of Service Traffic Table 413 414 RESOLUTION NO. 2016 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS AND A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND CERTIFYING THE VILLAGE BUILD -OUT PLAN EIR (SCH 2015101019) PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT CASE NUMBER: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2016-0012 APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 20tn day of December, 2016, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2016-0012 and Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2016-0005, to implement the Village Build -Out Plan; and WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on December 9, 2016 as prescribed by the Municipal Code; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the findings found in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case. SECTION 2. That the City Council does hereby find that the benefits of the proposed project outweigh the environmental impacts associated with air quality emissions, greenhouse gas emissions, and traffic and circulation, as fully described in Exhibit A. SECTION 3. That the City Council certifies the Final Village Build -Out Plan EIR, including the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program included therein, and directs staff to post the Notice of Determination at the State Clearinghouse and the Riverside County Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on this the 201" day of December, 2016, by the following vote: 415 Resolution No. 2016 - Environmental Assessment 2016-0012 Village Build -Out Plan EIR (SCH No. 2015101019) Adopted: Page 2 of 2 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 416 EXHIBIT A COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016-XXX ADOPTED: DECEMBER 20, 2016 City of La Qu i nta Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations SCH No. 2015101019 October 2016 417 Table of Contents Section Page Introduction and Purpose......................................................................................... 1 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program...................................................................... 2 Locationof Documents.................................................................................................... 2 Section1 Discussion of Findings...................................................................................................... 2 1.1 12 1.3 Findings.....................................................................................................................4 Resolution Regarding No Impact on Environmental Issues ............................................. 4 Section:A. Agricultural Resources..................................................................................................... 4 2.1 B. Biological Resources......................................................................................................... 5 C. Geology and Soils............................................................................................................. 5 D. Hazards and Hazardous Materials.................................................................................... 5 E. Mineral Resources............................................................................................................ 6 F. Noise.................................................................................................................................6 G. Population and Housing................................................................................................... 7 H. Traffic and Circulation...................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Resolution Regarding Impacts Determined to be Less Than Significant ......................... 7 A. Aesthetics.........................................................................................................................7 B. Air Quality......................................................................................................................... 9 C. Hydrology and Water Quality.......................................................................................... 9 D. Land Use and Planning................................................................................................... 10 E. Population and Housing................................................................................................. 11 F. Recreation...................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 G. Traffic and Circulation.................................................................................................... 13 Resolution Regarding Impacts Determined to be Less Than Significant With Mitigation 15 A. Aesthetics....................................................................................................................... 15 B. Air Quality....................................................................................................................... 15 C. Biological Resources....................................................................................................... 16 D. Cultural Resources.......................................................................................................... 18 E. Geology and Soils........................................................................................................... 24 Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact i October 2016 418 Table of Contents F. Greenhouse Gases.......................................................................................................... 26 G. Hazards and Hazardous Material................................................................................... 27 H. Hydrology and Water Quality........................................................................................ 30 I. Land Use and Planning................................................................................................... 34 J. Noise...............................................................................................................................36 K. Public Services................................................................................................................ 38 L. Utilities and Service Systems.......................................................................................... 40 Resolution Regarding Significant Environmental Impacts Which Cannot be Avoided if the Project is Implemented....................................................................................................... 45 2.4 A. Air Quality....................................................................................................................... 45 B. Greenhouse Gas Emissions............................................................................................ 49 C. Traffic and Circulation.................................................................................................... 50 Resolution Regarding Cumulative Environmental Impacts ........................................... 52 2.5 Resolution Regarding Irreversible Environmental Changes ........................................... 53 2.6 Resolution Regarding Growth Inducing Impacts........................................................... 55 2.7 7 Resolution Regarding Alternatives................................................................................. 55 2 2.9 Resolution Adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations ................................... 59 Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact ii October 2016 419 Findings Introduction and Purpose The project addressed in these Findings of Fact is the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan. SPi`h�I�li�rnia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) statutes (Public Resources Code Sections 21000 through 21178) Section 21081 requires the Lead Agency (City of La Quinta) to issue written findings for significant impacts identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR), accompanied by a brief rationale for each finding. Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines states that: (a) No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been certified which identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding: The possible findings are: (1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. (2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. (3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. (b) With respect to significant effects which were subject to a finding under paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the public agency finds that specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects on the environment. In accordance with Section 21081 of the CEQA Statutes, whenever significant impacts cannot be substantially mitigated and remain unavoidable, the benefits of the proposed project must be balanced against the unavoidable environmental consequences in determining whether to approve the project. The Lead Agency must make Findings of Fact and adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations where the decision of the Lead Agency allows the occurrence of significant effects that are identified in the EIR, but are not substantially mitigated. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 1 October 2016 420 Findings This document sets forth the City of La Quinta's Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations pursuant to Section 21081 of the CEQA Statutes, as supported by substantial evidence in the record. The EIR for the project, including the Draft EIR, as revised by the Final EIR's errata section, together with the other sections of the Final EIR, is incorporated in its entirety into these Findings as is fully set forth herein. Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program 1 Ps required by CEQA Statute (Public Resources Code) Section 21081.6, a program for reporting on and monitoring project mitigation will be adopted by the Lead Agency. Location of Documents 14he Draft EIR, Final EIR, and administrative record for the City of La Quinta's Village Build -Out Plan are available for review upon request at: City of La Quinta Planning Department 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 1.3 Discussion of Findings Where —as a result of the environmental analysis of the project and compliance with existing laws, codes, and statutes —impacts have been determined by the City to be less than significant and, therefore, do not require mitigation, such a finding, as well as a finding in the EIR of no impact, is referred to herein as Finding 1. Where —as a result of the environmental analysis of the project and the identification of feasible mitigation measures —potentially significant impacts have been determined by the City to be reduced to a level of less than significant, the City has found in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1) that "Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment." Such a finding is referred to herein as Finding 2. Where —as a result of the environmental analysis of the project, the City has determined that: a) even with compliance with existing laws, codes and statutes, and/or the identification of feasible mitigation measures, potentially significant impacts cannot be reduced to a level of less than significant; or b) no feasible mitigation measures or alternatives are available to mitigate the potentially significant impact, the City has found in accordance Public Resources Section Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 2 October 2016 421 Findings 21081(a)(3) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(3) that "Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report." Such a finding is referred to herein as Finding 3. References for discussion of environmental impacts within the EIR are noted with each finding. Impact numbers refer to the section number and the threshold letter referenced in the Draft EIR where the full discussion of impacts is included. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 3 October 2016 422 Findings Findings This set of findings is divided into types of impacts based on the significance of an impact as SEECf0loqd2in the EIR. Environmental impacts associated with the Village Build -Out Plan are categorized as follows: 1) less than significant and do not require mitigation; 2) potentially significant but will be avoided or reduced to a level of insignificance through the identified Mitigation Measures; or 3) significant and cannot be fully mitigated to a level of less than significant but will be substantially lessened to the extent feasible by the identified Mitigation Measures. Resolution Regarding No Impact on Environmental Issues 2.117he City Council hereby finds that the following potential environmental impacts of the Village Build -out Plan are less than significant and therefore do not require the imposition of Mitigation Measures. As part of the Initial Study process, the Environmental Checklist Form suggested by the CEQA Guidelines and utilized by the City of La Quinta was reviewed to assure that all environmental issues required to be addressed by CEQA would be addressed in the EIR. It was determined that the proposed project would have no impact on the following environmental areas of concern: A. Agricultural Resources Because the project site, the approximately 138-acre La Quinta Village Build -out Plan area is located in an urban setting where properties are developed, or if vacant, highly disturbed; there is no agricultural or forest lands that would be adversely affected by the proposed Village Build - out Plan. Therefore, the following environmental issues did not require evaluation in the EIR: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), to non-agricultural use. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 4 October 2016 423 Findings B. Biological Resources Because the project site, the approximately 138-acre La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan area is located in an urban setting where properties are developed, or if vacant, highly disturbed; there is no riparian habitat, sensitive natural communities or wetlands located in or adjacent to the project area; and, there are no wildlife corridors through the Village Build -out Plan area. Therefore, the following environmental issues did not require evaluation in the EIR: b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. C. Geology and Soils The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan area is not located within an Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone as no faults are known to traverse the Village Build -out Plan area. Additionally, all new development projects will be required to be connected to a sanitary sewer system and no septic systems will be allowed. Therefore, the following environmental issues did not require evaluation in the EIR: a-i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault. d) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water. D. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 5 October 2016 424 Findings The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan area does not include any sites or business that are currently listed on a list of hazardous materials sites, is not located within the limits of an Airport Land Use Plan, or in the vicinity of a private airstrip, and is not located in an area where wildland fires would expose people or structures to significant risk of wildland fires. Therefore, the following environmental issues did not require evaluation in the EIR: d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands. E. Mineral Resources The project area is located within Mineral Resource Zone 1 (MRZ-1). This zone includes areas where adequate information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence. Therefore, the following environmental issues did not require evaluation in the EIR: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan. F. Noise The Village Build -out Plan project area is not located near an airport. Therefore, the following environmental issues did not require evaluation in the EIR: e) If located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, a project would expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. f) If located within the vicinity of a private airstrip, a project would expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 6 October 2016 425 Findings G. Population and Housing The Village Build -Out Plan does not call for the removal of a substantial number of houses or people. Therefore, the following environmental issues did not require evaluation in the EIR: b) Displace substantial number of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. c) Displace substantial number of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. H. Traffic and Circulation The Village Build -out Plan area is not located near an airport. Therefore, the following environmental issues did not require evaluation in the EIR: c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks. 2.2 Resolution Regarding Impacts Determined to be Less Than Significant A. Aesthetics Impacts 5.1.o through 5.1.c (a) Substantial effect on a scenic vistas, (b) substantially damage scenic resources, and (c) substantially degrade the existing character or quality of the Village. Substantial Evidence Scenic Vistas. The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan will be developed consistent with policies and programs set forth in the La Quinta General Plan to protect existing views and maintain existing scenic vistas. A scenic vista is defined as a viewpoint that provides expansive views of a highly valued landscape for the benefit of the general public. Under existing conditions, there are no viewpoints within the Build -out Plan project area that would provide an expansive view of the local mountains. As a result, there would be no adverse effect on a scenic vista resulting from the development of new residential and non-residential uses in the project area. Scenic Resources. Scenic Resources includes trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings that are visible from a State scenic highway, or locally significant scenic resources such as the Coral Mountains to the south and west of the Village. Currently, there are no State scenic Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 7 October 2016 EWT Findings highways that run through La Quinta or near the Village Build -out Plan project area. However, the City has one street in the project area that is designated as a City Image Corridor - Calle Tampico. Within the Village Build -out Plan project area, residents and visitors currently have partial views of natural features, including the Coral Mountains to the south and west, and to a lesser extent the Little San Bernardino Mountains to the north. Building heights up to 60 feet, plus potentially greater lot coverage allowed on a project by project basis, will result in a denser Village with the potential to obstruct mountain views from local roads and residences. Future development proposals would be subject to the requirements set forth in the Zoning Code and require review by the City's Planning Commission on a project by project basis. Proposed projects may be subject to conditions of approval related to building design for building setbacks from streets, parkway easements, and pedestrian corridors; particularly for new development projects proposed along Calle Tampico. By considering views and view corridors on a project -by -project basis, setbacks from public streets, especially Calle Tampico, and setbacks between buildings, can reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Visual Character. Incompatible land uses or building design inconsistent with the General Pan - including height - have the potential to degrade the visual character and quality of the experience in the Village. The Build -out Plan includes proposed increases in intensity or density to allow for a more integrated urban feel, created by allowing residential uses above non- residential uses, and increasing building heights to provide greater density in the Village Build - out Plan area. The proposed project includes a Zoning Code text amendment to specifically allow for increased intensity and density of land uses in the Village Build -out Plan area. Any proposed increase in intensity or density would be considered on a project -by -project basis to ensure quality development and compatibility with land uses on adjacent sites, and within the Village as a whole. Therefore, impacts in regard to substantial degradation to visual character and quality of a site as a result of implementation of the Village Build -out Plan would be less than significant. Summary. Future development in the Village Build -out Plan project area could have an adverse effect on scenic resources and the visual character or quality of a site. However, future development proposals would be subject to the requirements set forth in the Zoning Code and on a project -by -project basis, review by the City's Architectural and Landscape Review Board and Planning Commission, and subject to conditions of approval related to building design for building setbacks from streets, parkway easements, and pedestrian corridors, particularly for new development projects proposed along Calle Tampico. Site Plan Review on a project -by - project basis, and considering each project within the context of other existing or future buildings in the project area would ensure that impacts to views of scenic resources and the visual character or quality of a site would be less than significant. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 8 October 2016 427 Findings Finding Regarding Impacts 5.1.a through 5.1.c, the City hereby makes Finding 1 that implementation of existing General Plan policies and Zoning Ordinance requirements for project review(s) will reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant levels. B. Air Quality Impact 5.3.e (e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people Substantial Evidence Odors. The Build -out Plan does not contain land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable odors. Diesel exhaust and Volatile Organic Compounds would be emitted during construction development within the Village Build -out Plan area, which are objectionable to some; however, emissions would disperse rapidly from the Village Build -out area and therefore should not reach an objectionable level at the nearest sensitive receptors. Finding Regarding Impact 5.3.e, the City hereby makes Finding 1 that odors generated by the proposed project will result in a less than significant impact. C. Hydrology and Water Quality Impact 5.8.j (j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow Substantial Evidence Inundation from Above -ground Storage Tanks. Strong ground shaking can cause structural damage to above -ground water storage tanks, especially when they are not adequately braced. This emphasizes the need to inspect and retrofit tanks to maintain their structural integrity. CVWD has ten water reservoirs in the City's planning area, with a total capacity of 44.6 million gallons. Six of the ten are above ground storage tanks located upslope from the project area along the southern portion of La Quinta Cove. All six storage tank sites have levee berms surrounding storage tanks for gradual offsite flow in the event of failure. All ten of the storage tanks are welded steel, constructed to current seismic and American Water Works Association standards. The existing structural integrity of the storage tanks will prevent excessive flooding in the event of failure. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 9 October 2016 428 Findings Finding Regarding Impacts 5.8.j, the City hereby makes Finding 1 that implementation of existing construction requirements and regular inspections of above -ground storage tanks will reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant levels. D. Land Use and Planning Impacts 5.9.a through 5.9.c (a) Physically divide an established community, (b) (b) conflicts with applicable land use plans and policies, and (c) (c) conflict with conservation plans. Substantial Evidence Established Community. The objective of the Build -out Plan is to focus development onto existing undeveloped vacant lots and redevelop underutilized properties, when the opportunity arises, with a variety of mixed -use residential and commercial development. The Village Commercial designation allows for the proposed increased residential density of up to 20-30 dwelling units per acre, which is higher than the density allowed under the High Density Residential designation of up to 16 dwelling units per acre. There are currently 33 single family and 251 multi -family dwelling units within the Village Build -out Plan area. All of these existing residential areas will remain unaffected by the Plan and implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will not physically divide an established community. Applicable Land Use Plans and Policies. The Village Build -out Plan will replace the existing Village Design Guidelines with: 1) a Zoning Code Amendment to set new standards for building height; and 2) site plan and architectural review of proposed development projects; therefore providing more flexibility in the type of architecture, density of uses, and opportunities to create a more livable, walkable community. The Plan is also consistent with SCAGs Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Plan by embracing new patterns of development that encourage a greater population density coupled with public amenities such as enhanced sidewalks, bike lanes and more comprehensive pedestrian crossings on public streets. Conservation Plans Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will not conflict with an established conservation plan adopted by the City. The Build -out Plan project area is within the CVMSHCP plan area, so all future development projects within the Build -out Plan will be subject to a mitigation fee to ensure the future availability of funds to purchase regional conservation lands. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 10 October 2016 429 Findings Finding Regarding Impacts 5.9.a through 5.9.c, the City hereby makes Finding 1 that implementation of existing General Plan policies, replacement of the Village Design Guidelines with a more flexible application/design review process that considers design on a project -by -project basis, and encouraging the creation of a livable, walkable community will reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant levels. E. Population and Housing Impacts 5.11.a (a) Induce substantial population growth, (b) displace a substantial number of existing housing, and housing with regard to the displacement of existing housing or existing population, and (c) displace a substantial number of people requiring the construction of replacement housing. Substantial Evidence Population Growth. The Village Build -out Plan has the potential to induce both direct and indirect population growth within the project area by identifying 50.9 acres of residential development that could result in up to 1,230 new residential units (multi -family), and approximately 799,786 additional square feet of commercial, totaling 960,711 square feet of commercial space at build -out. Using the City of La Quinta's 2015 average household size of 2.60, the Build -out Plan would have the potential to add an estimated 3,198 new residents to the City's population through the development of new dwelling units. The RTP/SCS considers new patterns of development as the regional economy continues to recover and grow, the composition of our population changes, the housing market responds to evolving needs, and demands and mobility innovations emerge. The proposed Village Build -out Plan is in line with the intent of the RTP/SCS goals and guiding policies regarding the creation of opportunities to increase densities of both residential and non-residential uses, to accommodate millennials seeking denser, mixed use urban areas and baby boomers downsizing and looking for opportunities to remain independent as they age by reducing the need to drive for goods and services. The Village Build -out Plan will provide a sustainable, downtown village community with mixed -use residential/commercial properties. The proposed housing within the project area would primarily consist of high density multi -family dwelling units either built above commercial/retail development or adjacent to it. Finding Regarding Impacts 5.11.a, the City hereby makes Finding 1 that implementation of existing General Plan policies, replacement of the Village Design Guidelines with a more flexible Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 11 October 2016 430 Findings application/design review process that considers design on a project -by -project basis, and encouraging the creation of a livable, walkable community will reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant levels. F. Recreation Impacts 5.13.a and 5.13.b (a) Impacts to Park and Recreation facilities, or (b) Impacts on the environment due to the creation of new parks or recreation facilities. Substantial Evidence Existing Parks and Recreation Facilities. The project area would result in an increase in residents, expanding retail opportunities within mixed -use areas of the Village Build -out Plan area would have a positive impact as it would strengthen and maintain events and activities promoted under the HEAL Cities Campaign in 2010 which helps City officials to adopt policies that promote healthy environments and physical activity within their community. A number of programs and activities could be implemented into the Build -out Plan, including the continued promotion of farmers' markets, creation of a community garden, promoting recreational activity and providing safe routes to school. The La Quinta Wellness Center is located within the Village Build -out Plan project area in the Civic Center at the site of the former Senior Center. It was renovated and expanded in late-2014 with improvements to promote wellness for the whole community. The recent expansion of the Wellness Center provides additional recreational resources to existing and future residents of the Village Build -out Plan area and reduces the need for new recreational facilities in the vicinity. The La Quinta General Plan requires the provision of 5 acres of parkland set aside for each 1,000 population. Based on this standard, a population of 3,198 at build out of the Village Build - out Plan area would require a total of 15 acres of parkland. In order to ensure funding is acquired for future purchases of land, all new development and redevelopment projects will be required to pay development impact fees directed towards the preservation, expansion and maintenance of the City's recreational parks and facilities, and contribute to new parkland acquisition in accordance with the Quimby Act. This process will assure that new park expansion is funded. Existing recreational facilities within the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area would continue to be maintained and supplemented through development impact fees set forth by the City of La Quinta. The City of La Quinta has established Development Impact Fees (DIF) for Parks/Recreation and Park Maintenance Facilities that apply to residential projects only. New residential development and redevelopment projects would be required to pay the most up -to - Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 12 October 2016 431 Findings date development impact fees at the time of project development, and thus would safeguard funding for maintenance and improvements to existing parks within the City. Creation of New Parks and Recreation Facilities. The Village Build -out Plan does not include any specific proposals for additional park land or recreation facilities. However, implementation of Mixed Use standards in the Village Build -out Plan area would provide incentives for the inclusion of plazas and public spaces in development projects; and implementation of the project would have a positive impact as it would strengthen and maintain events and activities promoted under the HEAL Cities Campaign in 2010 which helps City officials to adopt policies that promote healthy environments and physical activity within their community. The campaign was adopted to meet General Plan Policy PR-1.8, promote a healthy and active lifestyle for all residents. By maintaining consistency with Policy PR-1.8, HEAL would assist in encouraging residents and visitors to participate in walking, biking and sports -related activities, and attract local revenue to the project. A number of programs and activities could be implemented into the Build -out Plan with the promoting and expanding of the HEAL program, including the continued promotion of farmers' markets, creation of a community garden, promoting recreational activity and providing safe routes to school. The La Quinta Wellness Center is located in the Civic Center. It was renovated and expanded in late-2014 with improvements to promote wellness for the whole community. The 10,000+ square -foot La Quinta Wellness Center has a fitness center, various wellness classes, a gardening area, special events, and weekly programs for all ages. The recent expansion of the Wellness Center provides additional recreational resources to existing and future residents of the Village Build -out Plan area and reduces the need for new recreational facilities in the vicinity. Therefore, implementation of the project will not have a negative impact on the environment due the construction of new parks and facilities. Finding Regarding Impacts 5.13.a and 5.3.1c, the City hereby makes Finding 1 that implementation of existing General Plan policies, and creating a livable, walkable community will reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant levels. G. Traffic and Circulation Impacts 5.14.d through 5.14.f (d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature, (e) Result in inadequate emergency access, and (f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 13 October 2016 432 Findings Substantial Evidence Hazardous Design Features and Emergency Access. The Village Build -out Plan does not include any specific projects, but instead, analyzes build -out of the Village Build -out Plan based on desired residential and commercial development and redevelopment. Future projects are expected to be constructed on the Village's existing street grid, which generally provides safe, 90 degree intersections and appropriate line of sight. All future projects within The Village Build -out Plan project area will be required to undergo discretionary review with the City to ensure that design features are consistent with General Plan Policies and City Ordinances; including design features and project access to ensure that they are consistent with City guidelines and do not pose hazards to the public. Adopted Alternative Transportation Policies. The Village Build -out Plan is designed to meet the goals and policies identified in Section 5.14.3 to enhance the circulation network in the project area to efficiently, safely and economically move people, vehicles and goods into and around the Village. Ways in which the Build -out Plan meets goals and policies include: establishing traffic -calming features in the project area (Policy Circ-1.10, Program Cir-1-10j) such as round- abouts and back -in parking; reduce vehicular traffic and reduce vehicle miles traveled through the development of a land use pattern that maximizes interactions between adjacent or nearby land uses (Policy Cir-1.12); and develop and encourage the use of continuous and convenient pedestrian and bicycle routes and multi -use paths (Policy Cir-2.3). The proposed Village Build -out Circulation Plan (Exhibit 5.14-20 of the EIR) would maximize alternative transportation, complete the pedestrian network (enhanced sidewalks) and enhance the bike/golf cart lanes, and ensure that travel lanes accommodate NEVs, all providing connectivity throughout the Build -out Plan project area, which is consistent with General Plan Goals and Policies. Finding Regarding Impacts 5.14.d through 5.14.f, the City hereby makes Finding 1 that implementation of existing General Plan policies, circulation improvements associated with the General Plan, and creating a livable, walkable community will reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant levels. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 14 October 2016 433 Findings Resolution Regarding Impacts Determined to be Less Than Significant With Mitigation 2.A. Aesthetics Impact 5.1.d (d) Substantial adverse effect on light and glare. Substantial Evidence Light and Glare. Development of vacant land, and/or new replacement projects that may be developed on some underutilized properties within the Village Build -out Plan area would likely increase light and glare in the area. The City Outdoor Lighting Ordinance (Section 9.100.150 of the Municipal Code) provides regulations for reducing light and glare caused by new development. Changes, alterations, and other measures have been incorporated into the plan, or are otherwise being implemented, which will mitigate this impact to a less than significant level, as follows: AES-1 During the building permit application phase, evidence must be submitted to prove that a proposed project will comply with the City Outdoor Lighting Ordinance of the Municipal Code. Finding With regard to Impact 5.1.d, the City hereby makes Finding 2, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. B. Air Quality Impact 5.2.d (d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations Substantial Evidence Exposure to Sensitive Receptors. Construction -related air emissions have the potential to exceed state and federal air quality standards in the project vicinity. The data provided in the Air Quality Analysis for the project shows that none of the analyzed pollutants would exceed the SCAQMD Localizes Significance Threshold (LST) at the nearest sensitive receptors, with compliance with all SCAQMD rules for control of fugitive dust, maintenance of construction Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 15 October 2016 434 Findings vehicles and equipment, and use of reduced VOC asphalt architectural coatings and solvents. Therefore, a less than significant local air quality impact would occur to sensitive receptors during construction of the Village Build -out Plan. The long-term operational emissions are primarily in the form of mobile source emissions and consumer products. Due to lack of stationary source emissions, no long-term LST analysis was warranted. CO Hotspot Analysis. CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. The intersection with the highest peak hour traffic volume is located at Washington Street and Avenue 48 and has a PM peak hour volume of 2,475 trips for the build -out year with Village Build -out Plan project scenario. The 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide (1992 CO Plan) showed that an intersection which has a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day would not violate the CO standard. Therefore, as the intersection with the highest traffic volume falls far short of 100,000 vehicles, no CO "hot spot" modeling was warranted. Changes, alterations, and other measures have been incorporated into the plan, or are otherwise being implemented, which will mitigate this impact to a less than significant level, as follows: AQ-1 All development projects in the project area must adhere to SCAQMD Rules (see Section 5.2, Air Quality pp. 5.2-6 through 5.2-10 for a list of the applicable rules), for the control of fugitive dust, for the maintenance of construction vehicles and equipment, and for the use of reduced VOC asphalt, architectural coatings and solvents. Finding With regard to Impact 5.2.d, the City hereby makes Finding 2, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. C. Biological Resources Impacts 5.3.a and 5.3.f (a) A substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; or Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 16 October 2016 435 Findings (f) conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Substantial Evidence Candidate, Sensitive, or Special Status Species. Implementation of the Build -out Plan will result in the infill of all currently vacant properties, as well as the intensification of uses on some currently underutilized properties. A wide range of common and sensitive wildlife species occur in the City that may be affected by implementation of the Village Build -out Plan. Because most of the Village Build -out Plan project area is urban and any vacant properties display signs of disturbance and minimal ruderal vegetation, it is unlikely that suitable habitat for species protected under the CVMSHCP is present within the Build -out Plan project area. Additionally, avian species that can tolerate human disturbance will likely continue to inhabit the project area, and may be attracted to newly landscaped areas. Burrowing owl is such a species. Therefore, prior to development of currently vacant properties, an applicant must have a pre -construction survey performed to establish presence/absence of individuals. In addition, nesting birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. To avoid illegal take of nesting birds, construction activities should be conducted outside of nesting season, which is from February 1 through August 15. If timing restrictions make it impossible to avoid construction activities during nesting season, pre -construction surveys shall be completed prior to land disturbance. Habitat Conservation Plan. The Village Build -out Plan project area is within the planning area for the CVMSHCP, but is not within a designated conservation area. Nonetheless, new development proposed within the Build -out Plan area will be required to pay a mitigation fee to ensure the future availability of funds to purchase conservation land and offset potential impacts of development on the natural environment. Payment of mitigation fees would be the extent of an applicant's requirements regarding impacts to species protected under the CVMSHCP. Changes, alterations, and other measures have been incorporated into the plan, or are otherwise being implemented, which will mitigate this impact to a less than significant level, as follows: 13I0-1 Burrowing Owl. Prior to any land disturbance on currently vacant properties, an applicant shall have a biological survey conducted at the project site to determine presence/absence of the species. Results of the survey may determine whether focused surveys must be conducted. If the site survey determines the presence of burrowing owl, mitigation in accordance with the CDFW shall be implemented as follows: Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 17 October 2016 436 Findings If burrowing owls are identified as being resident on -site outside the breeding season (February 1 through August 31) they may be relocated to other sites by a permitted biologist (permitted by CDFW), as allowed in the CDFW Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (March 2012). If an active burrow is found during the breeding season, the burrow shall be treated as a nest site and temporary fencing shall be installed at a distance from the active burrow, to be determined by the biologist, to prevent disturbance during grading or construction. Installation and removal of the fencing shall be done with a biological monitor present. 13I0-2 Nesting Bird Surveys. Removal of any appropriate vegetation located on a project site shall be conducted outside of the avian nesting season (February through August). If construction must occur during the avian nesting season, a pre - construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted within seven days prior to any ground disturbing activities. If at any time birds are found to be nesting, construction activities within 250 feet of the nest must not occur until it is determined by a qualified biologist that the nest is no longer active. BI0-3 CVMSHCP Mitigation Fee. New development projects are required to pay the mitigation fees; even those projects located in urban areas. The most current rates (2016) are as follows (but future developments may be subject to updated fees): Dwelling Units Fee 0-8 units $1,301 per unit 8-14 units $541 per unit 14 + units $239 per unit Non -Residential Commercial/industrial $5,809 per acre Finding With regard to Impacts 5.3.a and 5.3.f, the City hereby makes Finding 2, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. D. Cultural Resources Impact 4.4.a (a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 18 October 2016 437 Findings (b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5, (c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature, and (d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries (e) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource as defined in Public Resources Code § 21074 Substantial Evidence Historical Resources. Within the State of California there are provisions in CEQA, its Guidelines, and other provisions of the California Public Resources Code for the protection and preservation of significant cultural resources (i.e., "historical resources"). Thirteen historically significant properties within and adjacent to the Village Build -Out Plan project area are reported in the City of La Quinta Historic Resources Inventory as locally significant resources and as a result are listed on a local register making them "historical resources" pursuant to CEQA. The condition of the 13 buildings was verified in a field visit on December 4, 2015. All 13 buildings were found to be in good physical condition and retain sufficient levels of historical integrity such that their previous evaluation of significance has not been changed. Only one of the 13 historically significant properties, a commercial building situated at 78035-78039 Calle Estado, is identified for potential redevelopment. This building is historically significant as a one-story building designed in the Spanish Colonial Revival style and as a commercial building in the historical downtown core. Demolition or alteration of this building should be avoided. If demolition or substantial alteration occurs, the project will result in a direct impact on this cultural resource. Such changes would be considered a substantial adverse change under CEQA. Therefore, avoidance is recommended. If the building is retained but redevelopment of this parcel occurs, the project could result in a substantial adverse change under CEQA. Therefore, mitigation measures have been included to ensure that new construction adjacent to this building is compatible in design, scale, massing, and appearance as required by CEQA through the imposition of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. Four of the properties in are one- and two-story commercial buildings designed in the Spanish Colonial or Monterey Revival style. They are historically significant for their architectural style and as original buildings of the historical downtown commercial core. Although these properties will not be physically altered as a result of implementation of the Village Build -Out Plan, new development constructed immediately adjacent to the buildings has the potential to result in indirect impacts on the historical integrity and significance of these buildings. If new construction is not compatible in design, scale, massing or appearance, the project could result Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 19 October 2016 438 Findings in a substantial adverse change under CEQA. Therefore, mitigation measures have been included to ensure that new construction adjacent to these buildings is compatible. Eight of the properties are residential buildings situated in the La Quinta Cove Thematic Historic District. They are historically significant for their architectural style and as original buildings of the historical La Quinta Cove residential tract development. Although these buildings will not be physically altered as a result of implementation of the Village Build -Out Plan, new development located adjacent to or within close proximity to these buildings has the potential to produce an indirect impact on the historical integrity and significance of these buildings. A project adjacent to or within close proximity to the buildings will result in a substantial adverse change under CEQA. Therefore, mitigation measures have been included to ensure that new construction adjacent to these buildings is compatible. Archaeological Resources. Previous cultural surveys throughout the City have identified approximately 500 archaeological sites, both historic and prehistoric. The Village Build -out Plan project area contains vacant properties, some of which may not have yet been disturbed by grading or excavation activities associated with development. Because the project area is considered to be highly sensitive for containing prehistoric archaeological deposits in subsurface contexts, vacant land that is proposed for development that has not been previously surveyed (See Exhibit 5.4-1) shall require a qualified archaeological monitor and Native American monitor to be present on site during grading and excavation activities. In order to increase parking within the Village Build -out Plan area, some development/redevelopment projects may include the addition of underground parking. This type of project would likely require deeper excavation than a typical project, resulting and an increased likelihood that archaeological resources will be uncovered. Therefore, proposed development/redevelopment projects that include underground parking will be required to have an archaeological monitor present during all phases to construction grading and trenching activities in order to reduce impacts on archaeological resources to less than significant levels. Paleontological Resources. The City experiences varying degrees of paleontological sensitivity according to soil types. The easterly portion of the Build -out Plan project area is located within a High Paleontological Sensitivity area; while the westerly portion is located in an area that is Undetermined. Since paleontological sensitivity in the westerly portion of the project area is undetermined, the entire Build -out Plan project area is assumed to have moderate to high paleontological sensitivity. Due to the wide range of projects that can be proposed within the Village Build -out Plan project area, future applicants will be required to have a paleontologist review grading and excavation plans and determine if monitoring during construction is required. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 20 October 2016 439 Findings Human Remains. The discovery of human remains is always a possibility during ground disturbances. State of California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98. Tribal Cultural Resources. It is unknown whether resources exist within the Village Build -out Plan project area, and previous correspondence with local tribes indicated that there was no specific information regarding cultural resources in the area, so construction activities could potentially result in direct or indirect disturbance or destruction of tribal cultural resources. Redevelopment within the Village Build -out project area is not anticipated to have a significant impact on tribal cultural resources because the sites for redevelopment are already highly disturbed. However, some development/redevelopment projects within the Build -out Plan project area are anticipated to propose underground parking, requiring deeper excavation than previously performed during original development. All projects proposed on vacant sites and development/redevelopment projects proposing underground parking will be required to have an archaeological monitor and Native American Monitor present during all phases to construction grading and trenching activities. Changes, alterations, and other measures have been incorporated into the plan, or are otherwise being implemented, as follows: CR-1 Demolition or extensive alteration of the building at 78035-78039 Calle Estado should be avoided. Overriding considerations to justify the loss of the building would need to be developed were demolition pursued. Because the building is significant for its architectural merits and as one of La Quinta's original downtown commercial buildings, mitigation measures such as photographic and written documentation must be developed prior to any demolition or extensive alteration of this building. Documentation of the building shall follow the Historic American Building Survey (NABS) Level I Standards. This documentation shall include production of high - quality archival print photographs and plan drawings of the building, including but not limited to a floor plan, elevation drawings, and any character -defining features or details on the building. All work carried out pursuant to the documentation of the building shall be conducted by, or under the direct supervision of a person or persons meeting, at a minimum, the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (48 FR 44738-39 as revised in 1994) as an architectural historian. A written report detailing the documentation shall be provided to the City of La Quinta upon completion of the work. The report shall be produced on archival materials and filed with the La Quinta Historical Society and Museum and La Quinta Library. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 21 October 2016 440 Findings CR-2 If redevelopment of 78035-78039 Calle Estado occurs, the design of any new construction adjacent to this one-story Spanish Colonial Revival -style commercial building must be compatible in design, scale, massing, and appearance as stated in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. The design of new construction should not replicate the historic building style resulting in a false sense of history, but it shall not contrast starkly from its architectural style or design. New construction adjacent to this historic resource shall be no more than two stories high, and shall not overpower or overshadow this building (massing/scale). The final design of the new construction should be developed in consultation with a historic architect or architectural historian who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (as published in 36 CFR Part 61). CR-3 The design of any new construction adjacent to the one- and two-story Spanish Colonial and Monterey Revival -style historic resources at 78023 Calle Estado, 77895 Avenida Montezuma, 77885 Avenida Montezuma, and 51001 Eisenhower Drive, shall be compatible in design, scale, massing, and appearance as required by the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. The building design should not attempt to replicate these buildings in appearance, but shall not conflict or contrast with their architectural style. New construction adjacent to these historic resources shall be no more than two stories high, and shall not overpower or overshadow these existing buildings (scale/massing). The final design of the new construction shall be developed in consultation with a historic architect or architectural historian who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (as published in 36 CFR Part 61). CR-4 The design of any new construction within the Village Build -Out Plan Area adjacent to the residences of the La Quinta Cove Thematic Historic District shall be compatible in design, scale, massing, and appearance with existing historical commercial buildings in the Village Commercial zone. The design of new commercial buildings should be compatible with the Spanish Colonial and Monterey Revival architectural style of the existing historical commercial core. New construction adjacent to the La Quinta Cove Thematic Historic District shall be no more than two stories high, and shall not overpower or overshadow the historical residential buildings of the La Quinta Cove as required by the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. The final design of the new construction should be developed in consultation with a historic architect or architectural historian who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (as published in 36 CFR Part 61). Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 22 October 2016 441 Findings CR-5 Because the project site is considered to be highly sensitive for containing prehistoric archaeological deposits in subsurface contexts, a qualified archaeological monitor (and Native American monitor) shall be present during all phases of construction grading and trenching activities for any project developed on vacant land that has not been previously surveyed for cultural resources, as illustrated in Exhibit 5.4-1 and any development/ redevelopment project that proposes underground parking. The amount of monitoring shall be determined by the archaeologist through the preparation of a monitoring plan to be prepared prior to commencement of grading. CR-6 A qualified paleontologist shall be retained prior to the start of construction for projects proposed on vacant lots or development/redevelopment projects proposing underground parking. After final depths of impacts are known (from grading plans), a paleontological mitigation plan shall be prepared limited to the proposed deep impact areas (greater than 3 feet) of the project only. In particular, the plan shall (1) clearly define that test trenches that would be dug to the maximum depth of proposed impacts, (2) permit the use of heavy equipment to perform the trenching as all samples will be taken from sidewalls after a stratigraphic profile is developed, (3) require recording of each strata revealed, (4) require radiocarbon dates for each strata, (5) require samples of about 10 kilogram (kg) for each strata with collection of additional samples up to 100 kg for layers rich in vertebrate fossils, (6) require identification and analysis by recognized experts, (7) require an interpretive report, (8) require curation of significant specimens recovered and (9) encourage publication of results. The plan would identify the amount of monitoring required. CR-7 In the event that human remains are uncovered, no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98. The Riverside County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the human remains are determined to be prehistoric, the coroner will notify the NAHC, which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD shall complete the inspection of the site within 48 hours of notification and may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. Finding With regard to Impacts 5.4.b through 5.4.e, the City hereby makes Finding 2, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 23 October 2016 442 Findings E. Geology and Soils Impacts 5.5.a (ii-vi) through 5.5.c (a) Expose people or structures to potential adverse seismic related effects involving: (ii) strong seismic ground shaking, (iii) seismic related ground failure, (iv) landslides, (b) result in substantial soil erosion or loss of top soil, and (c) locate a project on expansive soils creating substantial risk to life and property. Substantial Evidence Seismic Activity. Although no active or potentially active faults occur in the project area, new development, in accordance with the Village Build -out Plan, will result in construction of structures and infrastructures that could potentially expose persons and property to geological hazards during a seismic event. The General Plan Update indicates that seismic activity could potentially impact the project area. The project area would be subject to potentially moderate to severe ground shaking as a result of earthquakes along the San Andreas Fault Zone and associated faults in the area. All new buildings in La Quinta, including the Build -out Plan project area, must utilize reinforced masonry and must comply with the UBC/CBC. Additionally, preparation of a geotechnical and soils analysis for all new development and applicable redevelopment projects will be required to reduce impacts associated with seismically induced groundshaking to less than significant levels. Much of the project area contains alluvial soils mixed with lacustrine clay deposits, so localized settlement can occur where soils such as alluvium or wind-borne soils have been recently deposited. However, the General Plan does not characterize the Village Build -out Plan project area within the area that is susceptible to liquefaction. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) subsidence rates indicate rapid increases in subsidence rates, which is primarily attributed to groundwater extraction in the Coachella Valley. Testing and review of adequacy of soils by the Building and Safety Department would reduce impacts in regard to collapsible soils. Ultimately, the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area is located southwest of the subsidence zone in La Quinta, and therefore, is not expected to be significantly impacted by regional subsidence. Soil Erosion. Climate, topography, soil and rock types, and vegetation are all factors that influence erosion, runoff, and sedimentation. Within the project area, grading and clearing activities eliminate protective vegetation, modify natural drainage patterns, and compress soils. Development plans for new projects in the project area are required to incorporate temporary and permanent erosion control, including the preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 24 October 2016 443 Findings Plan (SWPPP), Best Management Practices (BMPs) and in some cases the preparation of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for a project site. The project area has a high to very high likelihood for wind erosion. Soils may be loosened and transported during grading and construction activities. Erosion control measures including routine site watering, cessation of construction on extremely windy days, installation of wind barriers and soil watering at construction sites would be used and required for development within the project area pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 403. Expansive Soils. Varying amounts of fine-grained silts and clays within soils may shrink or swell as moisture content changes. The project area and the Valley floor are underlain by alluvial sand and gravel interbedded with fine-grained lakebed deposits such as silts and clays. Lacustrine soils have high permeability, except for where they are interbedded with silt or clay layers, which slow the downward percolation of water. There may be considerable variation in the expansion of these soils, but required preparation of a geotechnical and soils analysis for all new development and applicable redevelopment projects would maintain consistency with City Policy GEO-1.3 and Program GEO-1.3a. Changes, alterations, and other measures have been incorporated into the plan, or are otherwise being implemented, which will mitigate this impact to a less than significant level, as follows: GEO-1 Applicants for new structures shall utilize modern building materials and techniques, and be built in accordance with the latest version of the California Building Code (CBC). GEO-2 Applicants for new development projects, including redevelopment involving changes to building size shall be required to prepare a detailed geotechnical and soils analysis that includes soil sampling, laboratory testing and mitigation measures intended to reduce potential geotechnical hazards to less than significant levels. Finding With regard to Impacts 5.5.a (ii-iv) through 5.5.c, the City hereby makes Finding 2, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 25 October 2016 444 Findings F. Greenhouse Gases Impact 5.6.b (b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases Substantial Evidence The City of La Quinta Draft Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan is the applicable plan adopted by the City for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. The project's emissions for the baseline year would be 59,232.89 MTCO2e per year as opposed to the project's mitigated 2035 emissions which would be lowered to 27,111.64 MTCO2e per year. With mitigation and compliance with regulations, the Village Build -out Plan year 2035 mitigated emissions would be reduced by 54.2 percent from baseline (2005) emissions; which meets the City of La Quinta GHG Reduction Plan threshold of a 28 percent reduction from baseline emissions by 2035. Changes, alterations, and other measures have been incorporated into the plan, or are otherwise being implemented, which will mitigate this impact to a less than significant level, as follows: GHG-1 Project applicants shall provide sidewalks within the project boundary and along the off -site roadway improvements where these are lacking. GHG-2 Project applicants shall ensure that all building structures meet or exceed 2013 Title 24, Part 6 Standards and meet Green Building Code Standards, or more stringent standards if in place at the time building permits are issued. GHG-3 Project applicants shall ensure that all faucets, toilets and showers installed in the proposed structures utilize low -flow fixtures that would reduce indoor water demand by 20 percent per CalGreen Standards to the satisfaction of the Building Department. GHG-4 Project applicants shall ensure that ENERGY STAR -compliant appliances are installed where appliances are required on -site. GHG-5 Project applicants shall implement recycling programs that reduce waste to landfills by a minimum of 75 percent. GHG-6 Project applicants shall install high -efficiency lighting be installed that is at least 10 percent more efficient than standard lighting. GHG-7 To the extent feasible, project applicants shall use paints and coatings with a VOC content lower than SCAQMD Rule 1113 requires for application to surfaces of residential dwelling units and commercial units within project boundaries. AQ-1 All development projects in the project area must adhere to SCAQMD Rules (see Section 5.2, Air Quality pp. 5.2-6 through 5.2-10 for a list of the applicable rules), for Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 26 October 2016 445 Findings the control of fugitive dust, for the maintenance of construction vehicles and equipment, and for the use of reduced VOC asphalt, architectural coatings and solvents. Finding With regard to Impact 5.6.b, the City hereby makes Finding 2, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. G. Hazards and Hazardous Material Impacts 5.7.a through 5.7.c, and 5.7.g (a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, (b) through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment, (c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school, and (g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Substantial Evidence Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials; and create a significant hazard to the public. New commercial, residential, and mixed -use development will result in an increased population of residents and non-residents that could be susceptible to hazards and hazardous materials. Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan. All new and existing businesses within the Village Build -out Plan project area that meet the storage quantity of hazardous materials described in the environmental settingwill be required to prepare a Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan HMBEP to be routed to County Department of Environmental Health (DEH), the Fire Department, and the City's Building Department for review. Once approved, the HMBEP will be kept on file with the City of La Quinta and County of Riverside and thus will maintain consistency with General Plan Policy HAZ-1.1 and Program HAZ-1.2a. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-2, compliance with requirements for the preparation of a HMBEP will result in less than significant impacts for applicable commercial development. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 27 October 2016 446 Findings Spill Prevention Counter-measure Contingency Plan. As a general requirement by the City and the Riverside County Fire Department, any future or existing commercial business or facility within the Village Build -out Plan project area that proposes the use of hazardous materials will be required to prepare a Spill Prevention Counter-measure Contingency (SPCC) Plan that addresses appropriate protocol measures to contain accidental spills of hazardous materials. A SPCC spill kit will also be required to be placed onsite at the business or facility. By requiring an SPCC Plan for all development projects, the project will maintain consistency with General Plan Policy HAZ-1.1. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 through HAZ-3 in compliance with federal, State, local regulations and programs available to address the safe handling of hazardous materials, impacts from implementation of Village Build -out Plan will be reduced to less than significant levels. Transport of Hazardous Materials. Hazardous materials are highly regulated by various government agencies, such as Caltrans, the California Highway Patrol, and the US Department of Transportation, and cleanup and containment of these accidents is monitored by these same agencies. Emergency evacuation and response plans are developed in La Quinta to provide automated notification to residents during an emergency, including hazardous waste spills and thus would maintain consistency with Goal HAZ-1 in protecting residents from hazardous and toxic materials. Cleanup of hazardous materials, and emergency evacuation response plans are already in place with the City of La Quinta. As such, significant hazards to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials as a result of implementation of the Village Build -out Plan are expected to be less than significant. Household Hazardous Waste. The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan calls for 1,230 additional residential units in the Village. The amount of hazardous materials utilized by new residents within the project area will be typical of what is found within existing homes, and thus will pose minimal danger in the event of a spill or accidental release, and is not expected to create any significant hazards. Household hazardous waste can be disposed of properly through Household Hazardous Waste disposal events, or at a network of "ABOP" facilities operated by the Riverside County Department of Waste Resources. An ABOP — or Antifreeze, Batteries, Oil, Paint — facility is located in Palm Springs and is open regularly to accept these materials, as well as electronic waste. Household Hazardous Waste disposal events are held periodically at varying locations throughout the County, including the City of La Quinta. Availability of these County -hosted events not only assists in the safe disposal of household hazardous waste but also educates City residents and in turn, maintains consistency with General Plan Goal HAZ-1.3, Policy HAZ-1.3, Program HAZ-1.3a and Program HAZ-1.3b. Emit hazardous emissions or materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of a school. Benjamin Franklin Elementary School is located within the project area at the northeast corner of Calle Tampico and Eisenhower Drive. John Adams Elementary School is located just Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 28 October 2016 447 Findings outside of the project area on the northeast corner of Desert Club Drive and Springtime Way. John Adams Elementary School, has closed and will no longer operate as a school. However the school district has discussed the possibility that this school could be used as a preschool in the future. Regulatory plans, measures and facilities are included in the school district's adopted protocol for handling onsite hazardous materials and in compliance with County of Riverside CUPA. Furthermore, existing and future adjacent land use development and redevelopment within the Village Build -out Plan project area will also be required to follow similar protocol as adopted by the City. Therefore, with the implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-4 and compliance with federal, State and local regulations and programs for both the Village Build -out Plan and for Benjamin Franklin Elementary School, the project will maintain consistency with General Plan Goal HAZ-1, Policy HAZ-1.1 and Policy HAZ-1.1b and impacts will be less than significant. Emergency Response and Evacuation Plans. The Village Build -out Plan will facilitate new development, and therefore will contribute to an increase in population and in turn, will have the potential to affect emergency response plans and emergency evacuation plans. To maintain consistency with General Plan GOAL HAZ-1, the City prepared the Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) to prepare for emergencies, and has instituted the Code RED notification system to help notify the public, through telephone calls, about emergencies such as water contamination, evacuation notices, wildfires, bomb threats, hazardous spills, and other emergency situations. The City is also involved in the Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) program. New residents of La Quinta, as a result of new development brought on by implementation of the Village Build -out Plan, may allow for more volunteers for groups such as CERT. Emergency accessibility for fire and medical emergency response services will be crucial for all new and proposed redeveloped projects within the project area. Appropriate means of accessibility and emergency evacuation routing will have to be demonstrated in the project plans to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Therefore, with the City's commitment to EOP and CERT protocol in the project area and implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-5, impacts in regard to adopted emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans will be reduced to less than significant levels. Changes, alterations, and other measures have been incorporated into the plan, or are otherwise being implemented, which will mitigate this impact to a less than significant level, as follows: HAZ-1 All new development projects that propose the use, transport or storage of hazardous materials in their plan of operations and are defined as a new generator of hazardous materials shall comply with all local, state, and federal regulations, as required by law. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 29 October 2016 448 Findings HAZ-2 In compliance with Chapter 6.95 of the California Health & Safety Code (HSC) and Title 19, Division 2, of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), all new development that proposes the storage and use of hazardous materials at or above reporting criteria thresholds shall prepare a Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan (HMBEP). The HMBEP shall be reviewed and approved by the County of Riverside CUPA and the Department of Environmental Health prior to the initiation of operation of the business. HAZ-3 All new development projects that propose the use and storage of hazardous materials will be required to prepare a Spill Prevention Counter Measurement Contingency Plan (SPCC) that addresses appropriate protocol measures to contain accidental spills of hazardous materials. A SPCC spill kit shall also be placed onsite at the business or facility. HAZ-4 All new development and redevelopment projects within the Village Build -out Plan project area shall submit development plans and permits to the City for review, and City shall coordinate with the Desert Sands Unified School District regarding any proposed land uses that will produce hazardous waste, such as doctor's offices. HAZ-5 All project development proposals shall submit plans to the Fire Department for review and conditioning for safe accessibility of fire and ambulatory services and for appropriate evacuation routing of the project development in the event of an emergency. Finding With regard to Impacts 5.7.a through 5.7.c, and 5.7.g, the City hereby makes Finding 2, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. H. Hydrology and Water Quality Impacts 5.8.a through 5.7.h (a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, (b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g. the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses for which permits have been granted), Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 30 October 2016 449 Findings (c) Substantially alter existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site, (d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration or course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site, (e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff, (f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality, and (g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map. Substantial Evidence Violate water aualitv standards or waste discharge reauirements. Construction activities within the Village Build -out Plan project area could expose soils to erosion from rainfall, runoff, and wind. Erosion from rainfall and runoff could result in pollutants from heavy equipment or construction related materials, such as diesel, gasoline, oils, grease, solvents, lubricants, or other petroleum products to mix with the water and run off -site. Therefore, all project applicants who disturb one acre or more must prepare a SWPPP to be implemented throughout the project construction period. Each SWPPP must list and prescribe appropriate best management practices (BMPs) for the control and treatment of runoff from the project site. During long term operation, each project will be required to maintain the site under a post construction Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that addresses all potential runoff and ongoing maintenance of BMPs. Groundwater Depletion. A Water Supply Study (WSS) was prepared for the La Quinta General Plan that provided estimates of existing water demands generated within the General Plan Planning Area and projected future water demands that will be generated at build out of the proposed General Plan. Existing water demands for the General Plan Planning Area from the WSS are estimated to be 32,496 acre-feet per year and build -out water demands are estimated to be 54,467 acre-feet per year. CVWD serves as the water provider for the City of La Quinta. CVWD's 2010 UWMP accounts for new growth and development that is expected to occur within the La Quinta Planning Area, including the Village Build -out Plan area. Water demands generated by the General Plan Planning Area, including the Village Build -out project area, are fully captured and accounted for within the CVWD UWMP projections. Therefore, water demand projections as proposed under Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 31 October 2016 450 Findings the 2035 General Plan are consistent with the water demand estimates utilized by CVWD. Water supplies that serve the existing La Quinta Planning Area are derived from groundwater in storage and imported Colorado River water and State Water Project (SWP) exchange water. CVWD projects that, in 2035, the urban water demand total of 242,700 acre-feet per year will be supplied by 53 percent groundwater, 20 percent treated Colorado River Water, 22 percent untreated Colorado River Water, and 4 percent desalinated agricultural drain water. The current UWMP finds that with groundwater supplies, imported water supplies, water conservation programs, and recharge activity water supplies are sufficient to meet demands during normal, single, and multiple dry year conditions through 2035. As such, the level of additional water supplies needed to meet demands generated by development within the Village Build -out Plan will not substantially deplete groundwater reserves or interfere with groundwater recharge. Drainage Patterns, Storm Drain Infrastructure, and Flood Hazards. A Hydrology report was prepared for the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan to analyze effects development may have on drainage patterns in the project area. The results of the analyses in the La Quinta Village Hydrology Study suggest that the level of impingement to commercial development in order to retain 10-year flows on -site is largely relative to the expected increase in surface street runoff due to development of existing vacant lots within the hydrology study area. Since on -site streets and storm drain facilities along Calle Tampico do not have capacity to convey 10-year storm runoff under the existing condition, and the increase in runoff due to development of the existing vacant parcels is relatively small, the recommendation is that a "drainage mitigation" development fee be required to supplement funding for upgrades to the existing storm drain evacuation system. The City of La Quinta is responsible for constructing improvements to the storm drain evacuation system in the Village Build -out Plan area and requires that the improvements must be made prior to commencement of development of new projects in the project area that are proposed after adoption of the Build -out Plan. Of particular concern is the construction of storm drain improvements along Calle Tampico. The use of an off -site retention basin designed to capture flows generated during the 10-year storm event has been suggested as a possible design solution and involves the need for existing surface streets and storm drain facilities to provide conveyance to an off -site location when they are already beyond capacity under the existing condition. This reinforces the conclusion that a drainage mitigation fee intended to upgrade existing facilities is warranted. The City has committed to making the necessary drainage improvements to the storm drain evacuation system in advance of build -out of the Village Build -out Plan, thus solving the flooding problem in the project area. Changes, alterations, and other measures have been incorporated into the plan, or are otherwise being implemented, which will mitigate this impact to a less than significant level, as follows: Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 32 October 2016 451 Findings HWQ-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits on vacant or underutilized parcels that will be developed within the Village Build -out Plan, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared for all projects within the Village Build -out Plan that disturb one acre or more. The SWPPP shall list appropriate best management practices (BMPs) for the control and treatment of runoff from the project site. The applicant is responsible for the preparation and implementation of the SWPPP per the NPDES requirements and must file a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resource Control Board and receive a Waste Discharge ID Number (WDID), and have a copy of the SWPPP at the project site at all times during construction. HWQ-2 Prior to the issuance of building permits on vacant parcels within the Village Build - out Plan project area, a WQMP for post construction conditions shall list appropriate best management practices (BMPs) for the control and treatment of runoff from the project site. The WQMP must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer or his/her designee. HWQ-3 The City of La Quinta is responsible for constructing improvements to the storm drain evacuation system in the Village Build -out project area. These improvements must be made prior to commencement of development of new projects in the project area, proposed after adoption of the Build -out Plan. Subsequently, prior to issuance of buildings permits for new development on vacant properties or redevelopment of underutilized properties in the project area applicants will pay development impact fees for drainage improvements to the storm drain evacuation system. HWQ-4 Prior to project construction of new projects on vacant lands, or redevelopment projects on currently developed parcels, the project applicant shall pay a Development Impact Fee specific towards funding of storm drain upgrade improvements along Calle Tampico Ave. HWQ-5 All project development within the Village Build -out Plan shall coordinate and cooperate with CVWD to ensure City-wide compliance with current State Senate Bill x7-7 to reduce per capita urban water use by 36 percent for year 2016, and 20 percent reduction by year 2020, including landscaping conversion programs and the smart irrigation control program; expanding the availability of sustainable water supplies such as tertiary treated water, and encouraging its use for landscape irrigation purposes, especially for irrigating golf courses and other large landscaped areas, and/or other mandates imposed at the time development occurs. HWQ-6 The City shall review and amend its Development Standards to require that all new development within the Village Build -out Plan demonstrate a reduction of domestic water consumption equivalent to the CalGreen Tier One standards in effect at the time of development. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 33 October 2016 452 Findings HWQ-7 The City shall continue to implement its Water Efficient Landscape ordinance by requiring that development projects within the Village Build -out Plan implement water efficient landscaping plans to meet or exceed current water efficiency standards. HWQ-8 The City shall require that new development within the Village Build -out Plan reduce its projected water consumption over "business -as -usual" consumption rates. HWQ-9 The City shall develop programs to allow and encourage the retrofitting of existing water intensive appliances and irrigation systems for existing development within the Village Build -out Plan. HWQ-10 The City shall continue to require that all new developments within the Village Build - out Plan use water conserving appliances and fixtures, including low -flush toilets and low -flow showerheads and faucets, as well as the application of water -conserving technologies in conformance with Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code, Title 20, California Administrative Code Section 1601(b), and applicable sections of Title 24 of the State Code. Finding With regard to Impacts 5.8.a through 5.7.i, the City hereby makes Finding 2, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. I. Land Use and Planning Impact 5.9.b (b) Cause substantial reduction in the amount of parking available in the Village Build -out Plan area. Substantial Evidence Parking Analysis. Increased development and densities within the Village Build -out Plan area has the potential to impact parking availability within the Build -out Plan project area. A comprehensive analysis of available parking in the Village was conducted in 2006 (The City of La Quinta Village District Parking Study (Carl Walker, Inc. 2006)), and identified a surplus in parking stalls versus demand during all times of the year, including peak season. Since 2006, a number of new projects have been developed in the Village Build -out Plan project area. These projects added an additional 386 off-street parking spaces, increasing the total number of spaces in parking lots to 2,803. In September 2015, the City Council adopted Ordinance 528 to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2015-0001, amending Section 9.150.060 (spaces required by Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 34 October 2016 453 Findings use) to allow for a reduced number of required parking spaces for properties within the Village Commercial Zoning District. Based on City Municipal Code Section 9.150.060 and the assumption that two spaces are needed per dwelling unit and one space is needed for every 250 square feet of commercial development, there will be a need for 5,680 parking spaces at build out of the Village, based on proposed land uses. If it is assumed that fifty percent of the required parking will be developed, which is consistent with projects developed in the Village since 2006, there will be a need for 2,840 parking spaces. As documented in the Parking Study, there was a surplus of 1,434 parking spaces in 2006, however projects developed since 2006 have reduced the surplus to 1,072 spaces. Therefore at build out of the Village Build -out Plan, there will be a need for at least 1,768 parking spaces to accommodate the additional proposed development of vacant sites and redevelopment of underutilized sites. At approximately 300 square feet per parking space, 12 acres of land would be needed for surface level parking, 6 acres if parking structures with two levels can be developed, and 4 acres if parking structures with three levels can be developed. Additionally, the City is committed to limiting the number of motor vehicles that enter the Village through the implementation of traffic calming (round-abouts) and pedestrian/bicycle infrastructure (enhanced sidewalks, bike lanes, etc.) and parking management strategies. Proposed traffic infrastructure improvements in the Village Build -out Plan area include converting some stop controlled intersections to round-abouts, constructing enhanced sidewalks and protected bike/golf cart lanes, and providing additional pedestrian street crossings to encourage residents and visitors to walk, bicycle, or ride a golf cart rather than coming to the Village by car. Implementation of parking management strategies such as creating peripheral parking lots; initiating shuttle service; and where feasible, conditioning new projects to enter into shared parking agreements will reduce parking demand. Furthermore, requiring new projects to perform a quantification analysis of parking needs and incorporate methodologies from the 2006 Traffic Study would further ensure reduced parking demand. Changes, alterations, and other measures have been incorporated into the plan, or are otherwise being implemented, which will mitigate this impact to a less than significant level, as follows: LU-1 The City of La Quinta is committed to the success of the Village becoming a more livable place by creating a more accessible place for residents and visitors to live and visit while downplaying the need for motor vehicles. To that end, and for each new individual project, the City shall implement a required quantification analysis, methodology in the 2006 City of La Quinta Village District Parking Study, parking management strategies, parking supply strategies, and zoning/administration strategies beginning with those identified in EIR Table 5.9-4. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 35 October 2016 454 Findings Finding With regard to Impact 5.9.d, the City hereby makes Finding 2, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. J. Noise Impacts 5.10.a through 5.10.d (a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies, (b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels, (c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project, and (d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project Substantial Evidence Permanent Noise Increase. The City of La Quinta currently regulates noise levels for sensitive land uses. Existing noise sources in the City are generally from motor vehicle traffic, however noise is also generated from commercial and local business operations, and construction noise. Future noise contours for major roadways in La Quinta were analyzed in the La Quinta General Plan EIR to help determine the extent of future noise impacts associated with implementation of the General Plan. The goal of the Village Build -out Plan is to create a walkable mixed -use community with less reliance on vehicles, but an increase in population could result in more automobiles, trucks, and to a lesser extent buses. Therefore, noise levels along roadways throughout the project area are expected to increase. The City will adopt parking management strategies, including the use of remote parking lots and shuttle service into the Village Build -out Plan area, and implementing a number of traffic calming strategies along with increasing pedestrian, bicycle and golf cart access into and around the project area, thus reducing the reliance on the motor vehicle for trips into and through the Village Build -out Plan area. The City will continue to monitor ambient noise levels as new projects are proposed. In addition to new residential development, implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will facilitate construction of new non-residential land uses. Due to the mixed -use characteristics of Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 36 October 2016 455 Findings the Village Build -out Plan, sensitive land uses may be located adjacent to commercial areas. Noise studies may be required to be conducted on a project -by -project basis, as new projects are proposed. Temporary Noise Increase. Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan is expected to increase the amount of construction related noises associated with proposed new development and redevelopment. Increased construction noise has the potential to periodically increase ambient noise levels in excess of noise standards set by the City's Noise Ordinance. Construction activity is limited during established days and hours to reduce disruption on surrounding land uses. Groundborne Vibration. New development throughout the project area will require grading, trenching and other activities that may produce increased ground -borne vibration and noise. According to the City of La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.100.220.F, no use except a temporary construction operation shall be permitted which generates inherent and recurrent ground vibration perceptible, without instruments, at the boundary of the lot on which the use is located. A noise study will be required to be conducted on a project -by -project basis, as new projects are proposed. Groundborne vibration may affect sensitive receptors due to an increase in large vehicle traffic, like buses and trucks. There are no designated truck routes near the project area, but commercial properties may receive deliveries from large trucks. Some land uses will require deliveries of food, beverages, and other supplies that would arrive by truck. All truck deliveries within the Village Build -out Plan area will be limited to daylight hours. There are existing bus routes near the project area, which were included in the noise analysis for the General Plan. New routes may develop, especially to aide in reducing the reliance on vehicles in the project area. However, since buildout noise levels were analyzed in the General Plan EIR, noise impacts are expected to remain less than significant. Changes, alterations, and other measures have been incorporated into the plan, or are otherwise being implemented, which will mitigate this impact to a less than significant level, as follows: N0I-1 Based on a project's proximity to sensitive receptors, City Staff will determine if a Noise Impact Analysis is needed on a project -by -project basis during their review of project applications. If required, the study shall analyze noise levels within the proposed project, and include mitigation measures to assure that the modeled interior and exterior noise levels meet the City's standards. N0I-2 Truck deliveries to businesses in the project area that are adjacent to sensitive land uses shall be limited to daylight hours. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 37 October 2016 456 Findings Finding With regard to Impacts 5.10.a through 5.10.d, the City hereby makes Finding 2, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. K. Public Services Impact 5.12.a (a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: (i) Fire protection, (ii) Police protection, (iii) Schools, (iv) Parks, (v) Other public facilities. Substantial Evidence Fire Protection. Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan and the increase in population in the overall General Plan Planning Area is expected to result in an increase in demand for fire protection services. Additional equipment, vehicles and staff may be needed as the project area develops with increased density of uses. The County Fire Department evaluates specific development proposals based on their potential to demand additional fire department facilities, equipment and staffing. As the project area builds out, new "standards of cover" developed in association with the Fire Department's Strategic Plan will be applied to new development. Future development will continue to be subject to Fire Department review and new fire facilities will be considered as needed to ensure adequate provision of fire protection services in the project area. Additionally, the City of La Quinta has established Development Impact Fees (DIF) by land use type for public safety facilities. For residential uses, the DIF for Fire Protection is $206 per multi -family dwelling unit. The 1,203 proposed dwelling units in the Village Build -out Plan project area would all be condominiums or apartments. For non-residential uses, the DIF is $172 for General Commercial, $162 for Tourist Commercial, and $171 for Office Space. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 38 October 2016 457 Findings Police Protection. The project area La Quinta Village Build -out Plan is expected to add an additional 3,198 new residents. For the Village Build -out Plan, the number of new sworn officers for the 3,198 new residents would be 3.2 based on a ratio of 1 officer per 1,000 population. The Police Department would review future projects and the City would continue to monitor population growth and staffing levels to ensure that the Police Department can provide adequate police protection in the project area. Public Schools. New development in the project area will occur over time, and student populations are also expected to increase gradually. According to the Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) Fee Justification Report (2014), 15,156 unmitigated dwelling units are anticipated to be developed, creating a need for new school facilities. The proposed 1,230 dwelling units proposed in the project area are likely to be in addition to this number, as the City is proposing to increase the density of residential use in the project area. DSUSD will continue to receive developer's impacts fees for residential, commercial and industrial development, including fees from new development in the project area. Currently (July 2016), DSUSD fees are $3.36 per square foot for new residential development and $0.56 per square foot for commercial development. Libraries. Based on the County Library System's target standard of two volumes per capita, the estimated build out population of 79,956 in the City limits will require 268,704 volumes at build out of the General Plan, including build -out of the project area. Under this scenario, additional facilities would also likely be required to house the additional volumes and serve patrons. The City assesses Developer Impact Fees (DIF) on residential development for library services and facilities. Currently, fees are assessed at $348 for multi -family units. Based on these fees, new residential development in project area (1,230 new multi -family units) would generate $428,040 for libraries. Changes, alterations, and other measures have been incorporated into the plan, or are otherwise being implemented, which will mitigate this impact to a less than significant level, as follows: PS-1 The City and Riverside County Fire Department shall continue to confer and coordinate to ensure that facilities and services within the Village Build -out Plan are expanded in a timely manner. PS-2 The Riverside County Fire Department shall continue to review and evaluate new development proposals and project plans within the Village Build -out Plan to make certain that it can provide adequate fire protection. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 39 October 2016 458 Findings PS-3 All new development projects within the Village Build -out Plan shall be subject to Police Department review to assure that the Department can provide adequate police protection. PS-4 The City shall monitor City population and Police Department staffing levels to ensure the provision of police protection services at consistent levels. PS-5 Development projects within the Village Build -out Plan shall be assessed statutory school mitigation fees, in place at the time residential and commercial projects are proposed. PS-6 Development projects within the Village Build -out Plan shall be assessed development impact fees, in place at the time residential and commercial projects are proposed. Finding With regard to Impact 5.12.a, the City hereby makes Finding 2, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. L. Utilities and Service Systems Impacts 5.15.a through 5.15.h (a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board, (b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects, (c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects, (d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed, (e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments, (f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs, Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 40 October 2016 459 Findings (g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste, and (h) effects of the project on energy resources Substantial Evidence Exceed Wastewater Treatment Requirements. Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will facilitate development that will increase demand on existing wastewater collection and treatment facilities. Wastewater generated by the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan, at build out, would be approximately 175,890 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) for residential uses and 71,021 gpcd for commercial uses. The amount of wastewater from residential and commercial uses was derived from 85 percent of potable water ending up as discharged wastewater (i.e., toilets, sinks, showers, etc.) and the remaining 15 percent ending up as irrigated landscape. Although this level of wastewater generation is substantial, it will not exceed the combined treatment capacity at the CVWD treatment plants serving the City and project area. Further, CVWD continues to plan for expansion as needed. In maintaining consistency with General Plan Policy UTL-2.1, all new development will be required to connect to sanitary services by tying into existing sewer lines currently in place within the Village Build -out Plan area. To address new development within the Village Build - out Plan area and the La Quinta City and Sphere, the City and CVWD will have the opportunity to plan for and strategize options that may include construction of new sewer collection facilities and increase treatment capacity in order to address the long-term needs of the City. As future development connects to existing sewer facilities within the Village Build -out Plan area, they will nonetheless continue to be subject to connection fees. Extension of Wastewater Infrastructure. The project area is already served by sewer lines that are adequate for existing development. The increase in density and the intensification of land uses allowed under this plan through increased building height and development of mixed use projects, will increase the amount of wastewater generated in the project area. Growth trends will need to be monitored to ensure that adequate wastewater treatment facilities are provided to serve the project. Additionally, all developments within the Build -out Plan project area will be required to pay a connection fee, which will financially assist in future expansion of wastewater infrastructure. Extension of Stormwater Infrastructure. On -site streets and storm drain facilities along Calle Tampico do not have capacity to convey 10-year storm runoff under the existing condition, and the increase in runoff due to development of the existing vacant parcels is relatively small; therefore, the Hydrology Report prepared for the project recommends that a "drainage mitigation" development fee be required to supplement funding for upgrades to the existing storm drain evacuation system. The City of La Quinta is responsible for constructing Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 41 October 2016 460 Findings improvements to the storm drain evacuation system in the Village Build -out project area and requires that the improvements must be made prior to commencement of development of new projects in the project area that are proposed after adoption of the Build -out Plan. Of particular concern is the construction of storm drain improvements along Calle Tampico. The use of an off -site retention basin designed to capture flows generated during the 10-year storm event has been suggested as a possible design solution and involves the need for existing surface streets and storm drain facilities to provide conveyance to an off -site location when they are already beyond capacity under the existing condition. The City is committed to making the necessary drainage improvements to the storm drain evacuation system in advance of build -out of the Plan area. Additionally, all projects will be required to pay a development impact fee for drainage improvements at the time of the building permit. La Quinta Water Demand. A Water Supply Study (WSS) was prepared for the La Quinta General Plan that provided estimates of existing water demands generated within the La Quinta City and Sphere, and projected future water demands that will be generated at build out of the proposed General Plan. Development within the Village Build -out Plan project area was included in the WSS analysis as part of the City's overall development with an estimated 8,180 units projected for the entire City. Existing water demands for the La Quinta City and Sphere are estimated to be 32,496 acre-feet per year. Build -out (2035) water demands for the La Quinta City Limits are estimated to be 38,098 acre- feet per year, 314.85 acre-feet of which are estimated within the Village Build -out Plan project area. In comparison, the Build -out Plan would result in approximately 240.65 acre-feet of domestic water demand over the amount estimated for existing conditions in the Village. This represents an increase of approximately 23 percent. Urban Water Management Plan. CVWD's 2010 UWMP accounts for new growth and development that is expected to occur within the La Quinta City limits, including the Village Build -out Plan project area (Note: CVWD will implement its revised 2015 UWMP, which was adopted in June of 2016). The average gpcd water demand for the CVWD Service Area was approximately 482 gpcd for 2010 and is projected to be 423 gpcd for 2035. The La Quinta City and Sphere, including the Village Build -out Plan project area, with a projected demand of 361 gpcd by 2035 would fall well below CVWD's target of 485 gcpd under the 10-year baseline. Water Conservation. The City of La Quinta is committed to promoting water conservation and achieving water savings, protecting groundwater reserves, and preserving groundwater quality. In the Village Build -out Plan, water conservation can be achieved through retrofitting of existing water -intensive appliances with the installation of water efficient appliances, implementation of water efficient landscaping plans for all new development, the use of new technology, and Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 42 October 2016 461 Findings advanced irrigation control for outdoor landscaping. As such, the level of additional water supplies needed to meet demands generated by development within the Village Build -out Plan will not substantially deplete groundwater reserves or interfere with groundwater recharge. These measures will ensure the Build -out Plan does not significantly impact groundwater resources. Landfill Capacity. Burrtec is the franchise solid waste hauler for the City of La Quinta and most other cities in the Coachella Valley. Burrtec operates solid waste transfer stations; one at Edom Hill in the City of Cathedral City, and one at the closed Coachella Landfill in Riverside County north of the 1-10 freeway and east of Dillon Road. Burrtec, also operates compost facilities at both these locations, taking care of both solid waste transfer and greenwaste recycling for the City of La Quinta. Burrtec hauls solid waste to the County of Riverside Lamb Canyon landfill. The landfill is permitted to receive a maximum of 5,000 tons per day. As of January 2015, the landfill had a total remaining capacity of approximately 19,242,950 cubic yards or 14.4 million tons, if it is assumed that one cubic yard of solid waste compacted in place in a landfill is 0.75 tons. It is projected that current landfill capacity will extend to 2029, at a minimum. Greenwaste, foodwaste and some liquid wastes, including grease trap liquids and graywater, are taken to the Coachella Valley Compost facility where they are treated as feedstock that is blended into windrows that are treated and turned until it is ready to be cured and sold as soil amendment products. There are no land uses within the Village Build -out Plan project area that are expected to generate large quantities of solid waste or create conditions where substantial hazardous wastes are produced. Nonetheless, the Village Build -out Plan will contribute to an increased generation of solid waste. The City and Burrtec will need to continue to monitor solid waste generation levels to ensure that disposal of solid waste generated is performed in a cost- effective and in a safe operative mode. This will ensure that impacts in regard to landfill capacity and solid waste are reduced to less than significant levels. Energy Resources. Based on historical use data for the City of La Quinta and its Sphere provided by IID, it was estimated General Plan land uses at build out, which would result in electrical consumption of approximately 1,645,145,600 kwh/year. The Village Build -out Plan project area is considered within the overall consumption rates established in the Program EIR. On its own and at build -out of the Village Build -out Plan, consumption of electricity in the project area would be roughly 14,291,614 kilowatt kwh/year for commercial uses and 20,661,540 kwh/year for residential uses with an overall total of 34,953,154 kwh/year or roughly 2.1 percent of the electrical demand under the General Plan. Such an increase will likely create a need for additional electrical power supply sources. IID advised that additional electrical infrastructure and/or modification thereof may be needed to service the project. To alleviate this impact the City shall create a tracking log to be used by the City and utility Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 43 October 2016 462 Findings providers (wet and dry utilities) including IID, to address all new development projects proposed in the Village Build -out Plan project area. The tracking log would be evaluated by the City and utility providers on a project -by -project basis by inputting the type and size of the proposed use and determining whether or not the project in review, would contribute to a significant impact or cumulative impact thereby requiring the expansion of utility infrastructure including electrical infrastructure improvements (i.e., substation, transformers, etc.). Therefore, this type of protocol would reduce impacts in regard to electrical services to less than significant. Changes, alterations, and other measures have been incorporated into the plan, or are otherwise being implemented, which will mitigate this impact to a less than significant level, as follows: UTL-1 All new development within the Village Build -out Plan shall be connected to sanitary sewer service. UTL-2 The City shall ensure coordination with the Coachella Valley Water District to assure that existing and future extended sanitary sewer facilities are adequate to meet the needs of existing and expected future development of the Village Build -out Plan. UTL-3 The City shall create a tracking log for development projects in the project area that identifies the existing wet and dry infrastructure in the project area, then on a project -by -project basis, inputs the type and size of proposed uses, the potable water required, wastewater generated and electrical demand generated. The City will work with CVWD, IID SCG and others to determine when upgrades to infrastructure will be required. UTL-4 All project development within the Village Build -out Plan shall coordinate and cooperate with CVWD to ensure City-wide compliance with current State Senate Bill x7-7 to reduce per capita urban water use by 36 percent for year 2016, and 20 percent reduction by year 2020, including landscaping conversion programs and the smart irrigation control program; expanding the availability of sustainable water supplies such as tertiary treated water, and encouraging its use for landscape irrigation purposes, especially for irrigating golf courses and other large landscaped areas. UTL-5 The City shall review and amend its Development Standards, if necessary, to require that all new development within the Village Build -out Plan demonstrate a reduction of domestic water consumption equivalent to the CalGreen Tier One standards in effect at the time of development. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 44 October 2016 463 Findings UTL-6 The City shall continue to implement its Water Efficient Landscape ordinance by requiring that development projects within the Village Build -out Plan implement water efficient landscaping plans to meet or exceed water efficiency standards. UTL-7 In conjunction with the Coachella Valley Water District, as well as independently, the City shall develop programs to allow and encourage the retrofitting of existing water intensive appliances and irrigation systems for existing development within the Village Build -out Plan. UTL-8 The City shall continue to require that all new developments within the Village Build - out Plan use water conserving appliances and fixtures, including low -flush toilets and low -flow showerheads and faucets, as well as the application of water -conserving technologies in conformance with Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code, Title 20, California Administrative Code Section 1601(b), and applicable sections of Title 24 of the State Code. UTL-9 All new and existing commercial establishments within the Village Build -out Plan shall be required to comply with State mandates established under AB 341 to reduce the amount of packaging and potential waste associated with product manufacturing and sales. UTL-10 The City shall continue to refer project developers to Burrtec for development of construction and demolition solid waste recycling plans in order to divert a minimum of 50% of C&D debris from the waste stream. Finding With regard to Impacts 5.15.a through 5.15.1h, the City hereby makes Finding 2, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(1), that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate 2 ,fr avoid the significant effects on the environment. Resolution Regarding Significant Environmental Impacts Which Cannot be Avoided if the Project is Implemented A. Air Quality Impacts 5.2.a through 5.2.c (a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan, (b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation, and Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 45 October 2016 464 Findings (c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors) Substantial Evidence Consistency with Air Quality Management Plan. CEQA requires a discussion of any inconsistencies between a proposed project and applicable General Plans and Regional Plans (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125). The regional plan that applies to the proposed project includes the SCAQMD AQMP. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency: Criterion 1 - Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations Criterion 2 - Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP Criterion 1 - Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations. Based on the air quality modeling analysis completed for the project, short-term construction impacts will not result in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD regional and local thresholds of significance. However, the Air Analysis found that even with mitigation, long-term operations at build -out will result in significant and unavoidable impacts based on the SCAQMD regional and local thresholds of significance. The proposed project is projected to contribute to the exceedance of air pollutant concentration standards and is therefore found to be inconsistent with the AQMP for the first criterion. Criterion 2 - Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP. Consistency with the AQMP assumptions is determined by performing an analysis of the proposed project with the assumptions in the AQMP. The Village Build -out Plan project area is currently designated as Village Commercial (land uses within the Village Commercial designation include commercial, professional office, and residential uses), Neighborhood Commercial (Shopping Center), Major Community Facilities (Civic Center), and Parks and Recreation (La Quinta Community Park) in the General Plan. As it is consistent with the General Plan land use designations and with City Policy AQ-1.1 in assuring compliance with SCAQMD air quality standards, the Village Build -out Plan is not anticipated to exceed the emissions that are the basis for the AQMP assumptions for the Village area. However, based on the failure of Criterion 1 above, the Village Build -out Plan will result in an inconsistency with the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore, a significant impact will potentially occur. Construction -Related Impacts. Construction activities associated with the proposed project would have the potential to generate air emissions, toxic air contaminant emissions, and odor impacts. Using CalEEMod, the peak daily air pollutant emissions during each phase were Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 46 October 2016 465 Findings calculated and none of the analyzed pollutants are expected to exceed regional emissions thresholds established by the SCAQMD. These emissions represent the highest level of emissions for each of the construction phases in terms of air pollutant emissions with implementation of SCAMD Rules, per Mitigation Measure AQ-1. Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) are commonly related to diesel particulate emissions associated with heavy equipment operations during construction. Given the relatively limited number of heavy-duty construction equipment, the extended build out period and the short-term construction schedule, the Village Build -out Plan would not result in a long-term (i.e., 70 years) substantial source of TAC emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk. Participation in monitoring, managing and enforcing SCAQMD'S rules in regard to TAC emissions would assure the Village Build -out Plan's consistency with City Program AQ-1.1.a. Long-term Operational Impact. On -going operation of new and redeveloped land uses within the Village Build -out Plan area would result in a long-term increase in air quality emissions. This increase would be due to emissions from Village Build -out Plan -generated vehicle trips and through operational emissions from on -going uses within the project area. The data provided in EIR Table 5.2-6 shows that for the on -going operations activities within the Village Build -out Plan area, VOC, NOX, and CO emissions would exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance. Therefore, mitigation is required to reduce impacts from VOC, NO, and CO emissions. Mitigation Measures AQ-2 through AQ-9 are provided to reduce the operational emissions. Even with incorporation of the aforementioned mitigation measures, VOC, NO, and CO would still exceed the regional emissions thresholds. Therefore, a significant impact will potentially occur. Changes, alterations, and other measures have been incorporated into the plan, or are otherwise being implemented, which will mitigate this impact to the greatest extent feasible, as follows: Construction Measures AQ-1 All development projects in the project area must adhere to SCAQMD Rules (see Section 5.2, Air Quality pp. 5.2-6 through 5.2-10 for a list of the applicable rules), for the control of fugitive dust, for the maintenance of construction vehicles and equipment, and for the use of reduced VOC asphalt, architectural coatings and solvents. Operational Measures AQ-2 Project applicants shall require that ENERGY STAR -compliant appliances are installed where appliances are required on -site. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 47 October 2016 466 Findings AQ-3 Project applicants shall include high -efficiency lighting that is at least 10 percent more efficient than standard lighting. AQ-4 The City shall ensure compliance with SCAQMD Rule 1186 (limits fugitive dust on paved and unpaved roads and sets certification protocols and requirements for street sweepers) and 2202 (provides employers of 250 or more employees with a menu of options to reduce mobile source emissions generated by employee commutes), during long term operations in the Village. AQ-5 Project applicants shall provide sidewalks within each project boundary and along off -site roadway improvements. AQ-6 All project applicants shall ensure that new and/or remodeled buildings meet or exceed California Building Code Energy Efficiency Standards. AQ-7 All project applicants shall require that all faucets, toilets and showers installed in proposed structures utilize low -flow fixtures that would reduce indoor water demand by 20 percent per CalGreen Standards or more stringent standards if in place at the time development occurs. AQ-8 Project applicants shall implement recycling programs that reduce waste to landfills by a minimum of 75 percent or more stringent standards if in place at the time development occurs. AQ-9 To the extent feasible, project applicants shall use paints and coatings with a VOC content lower than SCAQMD Rule 1113 requires or more stringent standards if in place at the time development occurs, for application to surfaces of residential dwelling units and commercial units within project boundaries. 1. Most significant environmental effects that can feasibly be avoided have been substantially reduced by virtue of mitigation measures in the Final EIR or otherwise incorporated into the Build -out Plan as described in "1" above. 2. The remaining unavoidable significant effects are acceptable when balanced against the facts set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, giving greater weight to the remaining unavoidable significant effect. Finding Regarding Impacts 5.2.a through 5.2.c, the City hereby makes Finding 3 that even though mitigation measures have been identified, no additional feasible mitigation measures or acceptable alternatives exist to fully mitigate these potentially significant impacts. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 48 October 2016 467 Findings B. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact 5.6.a (a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. Substantial Evidence SCAQMD Thresholds. The project's unmitigated emissions for buildout Year 2035 would be 37,922.64 MTCO2e per year with 7.4 MTCO2e/SP/year. A cumulative global climate change impact would occur if the GHG emissions created from the on -going operations would exceed the screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons per year of CO2e and the SCAQMD 2035 Target Service Population Threshold of 3.0 MTCO2e/SP/year. Because the emissions exceed SCAQMD thresholds, mitigation will be required and will be focused primarily on implementation of California Green Building Standards Code. The Village Build -out Plan's mitigated year 2035 emissions would be approximately 27,111.64 metric tons of CO2e per year; and at 5.3 MTCO2e/SP/year, would still exceed the SCAQMD 2035 Target Service Population threshold of 3.0 MTCO2e/SP/year for projects. Therefore, impacts from project -related GHGs through implementation of the Village Build -out Plan are considered to be significant and unavoidable. Changes, alterations, and other measures have been incorporated into the plan, or are otherwise being implemented to reduce impacts to the greatest extent feasible, as follows: GHG-1 Project applicants shall provide sidewalks within the project boundary and along the off -site roadway improvements where these are lacking. GHG-2 Project applicants shall ensure that all building structures meet or exceed 2013 Title 24, Part 6 Standards and meet Green Building Code Standards, or more stringent standards if in place at the time building permits are issued. GHG-3 Project applicants shall ensure that all faucets, toilets and showers installed in the proposed structures utilize low -flow fixtures that would reduce indoor water demand by 20 percent per CalGreen Standards to the satisfaction of the Building Department. GHG-4 Project applicants shall ensure that ENERGY STAR -compliant appliances are installed where appliances are required on -site. GHG-5 Project applicants shall implement recycling programs that reduce waste to landfills by a minimum of 75 percent. GHG-6 Project applicants shall install high -efficiency lighting be installed that is at least 10 percent more efficient than standard lighting. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 49 October 2016 468 Findings GHG-7 To the extent feasible, project applicants shall use paints and coatings with a VOC content lower than SCAQMD Rule 1113 requires for application to surfaces of residential dwelling units and commercial units within project boundaries. Finding Regarding Impact 5.6.a, the City hereby makes Finding 3 that even though mitigation measures have been identified, no additional feasible mitigation measures or acceptable alternatives exist to fully mitigate these potentially significant impacts. C. Traffic and Circulation Impacts 5.14.a and 5.14.b (a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit, and (b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways. Substantial Evidence The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the Village Build -out Plan considered future conditions without and with the project for an Interim Year (2021) and at build -out (2035). The TIA found that with the implementation of mitigation measures outlined in Section 5.14, Traffic and Circulation, all intersections within the TIA study area are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours for General Plan Buildout With Project traffic conditions. The TIA also analyzed roadway segments in the study area for both the Interim Year and the Build -out Year. For the General Plan Buildout With Project scenario, roadway segments are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service with the exception of the following roadway segments: Washington Street between Avenue 48 and Eisenhower Drive (Level of Service F); Calle Tampico between Desert Club Drive and Washington Street (Level of Service E). Although implementation of mitigation measures and Citywide Transportation Demand Management and Transportation Systems Management measures would help reduce impacts to these roadways, impacts cannot be fully mitigated. Therefore, impacts from project -related Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 50 October 2016 469 Findings vehicle trips associated with implementation of the Village Build -out Plan are considered to be significant and unavoidable. The following mitigation measures apply for Interim Year With Project traffic conditions: CIR-1 Washington Street/Avenida La Fonda (#13): Construct a raised "worm" median to allow northbound left -turns and restrict eastbound left -turns. CIR-2 Jefferson Street/Avenue 52 (#16): Reconstruct the existing round -about to provide two circulating lanes and two entry lanes at the northbound and southbound approaches. The new two lane round -about should be constructed with consideration for conversion to a three lane round -about by General Plan Buildout conditions. The following Mitigation Measures apply for General Plan Buildout With Project traffic conditions: CIR-3 Eisenhower Drive/Avenida Montezuma (#3): Convert Eisenhower Drive/Avenida Montezuma from an all -way stop control to a yield -controlled round -about [this improvement is assumed in the Village Build -out Circulation Plan]. CIR-4 Washington Street/Avenue 48 (#9): Construct the northbound approach to consist of three through lanes and one right -turn lane. Remove the pedestrian crosswalk at the north leg of the intersection. Based on the City's traffic study guidelines, the following circulation improvements apply in addition to the roadway improvements identified in the current General Plan Circulation Element: CIR-5 Eisenhower Drive / Calle Tampico (#2): Construct one additional westbound left turn lane to provide dual left -turn lanes. CIR-6 Avenida Bermudas/Calle Tampico (#5): Construct one additional westbound left -turn lane. The TIA identified an alternative to construct a round -about rather than adding an additional lane in the event that the improvement identified in the General Plan Circulation Element is infeasible. This will be determined by the Design and Development Director/City Engineer. CIR-7 Desert Club Drive / Calle Tampico (#7): Construct one exclusive northbound right - turn lane and one additional westbound left -turn lane. The TIA identified an alternative to construct a round -about rather than adding an additional lane in the event that the improvement identified in the General Plan Circulation Element is infeasible. This will be determined by the Design and Development Director/City Engineer. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 51 October 2016 470 Findings CIR-8 Washington Street/Avenue 48 (#9): Construct one exclusive northbound right -turn lane. CIR-9 Washington Street/Avenue 52 (#14): Construct one additional eastbound left -turn lane to provide triple left -turn lanes. Provide one additional southbound left -turn lane to provide triple left -turn lanes. The following mitigation measure is related specifically to intersections that have been identified to operate at LOS E along Calle Tampico CIR-10 For road segments along Calle Tampico between Avenida Bermudas and Washington Street, the City shall conduct periodic monitoring of actual conditions in the Village (timing to be determined as development begins to occur in the project area, and will review its Parking Demand Management strategies (directly correlated with traffic volumes) to determine additional strategies that can be employed related to remote parking and shuttle service, additional pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and education programs. Finding Regarding Impacts 5.14.a and 5.14.b, the City hereby makes Finding 3 that even though mitigation measures have been identified, no additional feasible mitigation measures or acceptable alternatives exist to fully mitigate these potentially significant impacts. 2.5 Resolution Regarding Cumulative Environmental Impacts Sections 15130(a) through 15130(e) of the State CEQA Guidelines require the contents of an EIR to include a discussion of cumulative impacts. Section 15355 of the State CEQA Guidelines defines a cumulative impact as a result of the combination of the project evaluated in the EIR together with other projects causing related impacts. Substantial Evidence Impacts regarding Air Quality were determined to be potentially cumulatively significant. Both short-term construction and long-term operations would contribute to significant cumulative impacts to Air Quality. The project is out of attainment for both ozone and PM10. Construction and operation of cumulative projects will further degrade the local air quality, as well as air quality of the Salton Sea portion of the South Coast Air Basin. Air quality will be temporarily degraded during construction activities that occur separately or simultaneously. However, the Air Quality Impact Analysis prepared for the project determined that, with implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1, construction activities would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance, and therefore would not contribute to cumulative impacts. However, the Air Quality Analysis also found that, even with application Mitigation Measures AQ-2 through AQ-9, Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 52 October 2016 471 Findings long-term operation of the proposed project is projected to contribute to the exceedance of air pollutant concentration standards and is found to be inconsistent with the AQMP for the first criterion. Therefore, the Village Build -out Plan will result in an inconsistency with the SCAQMD AQMP, resulting in a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact. With regard to cumulative impacts associated with Greenhouse Gas Emissions, implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will result in the emission of greenhouse gases through the combustion of fossil fuels during operation of vehicles, the generation of electricity at power plants, combustion of natural gas, and the transportation of water. The Air Quality Impact Analysis prepared for the project determined that, with implementation of Mitigation Measures GHG-1 through GHG-7, project -related GHG emissions would still exceed the Tier 4 SCAQMD 2035 target service population threshold of 3.0 MTCO22/SP/year, resulting in a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact. Findings With respect to Cumulative Impacts on Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the City hereby makes Finding 3 that no feasible mitigation measures or acceptable alternatives exist to mitigate these potentially significant cumulative impacts. 2.6 Resolution Regarding Irreversible Environmental Changes State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(c) states that the significant irreversible environmental changes that would be caused by implementation of the Village Build -out Plan are required to be identified in the EIR. Substantial Evidence Irreversible commitment of Resources The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan provides a plan for the future development and redevelopment of the City's traditional downtown Village as a pedestrian -oriented, mixed -use environment. The commitment of non-renewable natural resources is inherent in any development project, or in the case of the Village Build -out Plan, a number of development projects in the project area over time. Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan represents a long-term commitment to the consumption of energy for electricity, water supply resources, and construction resources. New development within the La Quinta General Plan Planning Area, including the Village Build - out Plan project area, will result in an increase in the demand for water of approximately 6,555 acre-feet within City Limits and 15,416 acre-feet within the Sphere of Influence by 2035. This new demand will be met by groundwater, imported Colorado River water, desalinated agricultural drain water, or a combination thereof. CVWD has determined that through Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 53 October 2016 472 Findings utilization of a combination of water supply sources including the need to provide expanded availability of tertiary treated water, and coordination by the City in implementing CVWD UWMP regulations, sufficient water supplies will therefore be available to meet demands in 2035. In the Village Build -out Plan, water conservation can be achieved through retrofitting of existing water -intensive appliances with the installation of water efficient appliances, implementation of water efficient landscaping plans for all new development, the use of new technology, and advanced irrigation control for outdoor landscaping. Mitigation Measures HWQ-4 through HWQ-10 in Section 5.8, Hydrology and Water Quality, will ensure that impacts in regard to water supply are reduced to less than significant levels. These measures are also repeated as UTL-4 through UTL-10 found in Section 5.15, Utilities and Service Systems. IID's Energy Department provides electric power to more than 150,000 customers in its service area, including the Village Build -out Plan project area. IID responded to the Notice of Preparation of the Draft EIR. The issues of concern for IID were not related to the amount of energy that would be required for the project, but rather, the potential effects future projects may have on its existing facilities and easements. IID is confident that because of their unique location in the Imperial and Coachella valleys, and continued efforts to bring more renewable energy on-line, there is adequate energy available in its service area. Construction materials consist of sand and gravel and related Portland cement concrete and asphalt concrete; as well as lumber and related wood products. The project area is in close proximity to a number of aggregate mining operations and aggregate product manufacturing for the construction industry. Approximately 10 percent, or 911 acres of the 9,094 acres of land designated by the State Mining and Geology Board in 1989 has been lost to land uses incompatible with mining. However, an additional 6,638 acres of land containing an estimated 472 million tons of PCC-grade aggregate resources have been identified in the Palm Springs P-C Region. Additionally, the Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) requires that a municipality be responsible for diverting at least 50 percent of solid waste from landfills. The most common construction materials to be recycled and reused are PCC and asphalt concrete (AC). Other materials include lumber and wallboard that can be ground up and used as feedstock for composting into soil amendment products or groundcover. Recycling of used construction materials would likely extend the consumption estimate for aggregate. Regarding lumber, sustainable forest management practices have evolved to meet the demand for forest products while balancing the values people attach to forests and the need for a stable supply of wood -based building products. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 54 October 2016 473 Findings Findings With regard to the Irreversible Commitment of Resources, the City Council finds that implementation of the Village Build -out Plan would result in the continued commitment to the consumption of such resources. Resolution Regarding Growth Inducing Impacts State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(d) requires that an EIR discuss the ways in which a 2•�roposed project could foster economic or population growth, or the construction of additional housing either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment. The Village Build -out Plan project area is a unique area in the City of La Quinta and development within the project area will occur within the 137-acre project area. The Plan is consistent with existing land use designations and it is the City's intent to build -out the project area with a mix of urban uses both residential and non-residential to create an accessible area conducive to walking and biking that reduces dependence on the automobile. From this perspective, the project would be growth inducing as the City is encouraging new development in the Village Build -out Plan area, an area already served by roads and utilities. The project area is developed and is surrounded by residential land uses so infrastructure, including roads and wet/dry utilities are already in place. Therefore, the project would not extend any roads or utilities into a new area not already served that would be considered growth inducing. Findings The City Council finds that the growth inducing characteristics associated with the Village Build - out Plan will be limited to an increase in population density, because the extension of roadway and utility infrastructure will not be required. 2.8 Resolution Regarding Alternatives CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6 states that an EIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects on the environment. Alternatives Considered and Rejected After consideration of all alternatives, two were rejected from further analysis for the proposed Village Build -out Plan: 1. No Project — No Development Alternative 2. Increased Density Alternative Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 55 October 2016 474 Findings Substantial Evidence for No Project — No Development Alternative CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e) specifically addresses the requirement to discuss a No Project - No Development alternative with the option to evaluate one of two scenarios: 1) when a project is a revision to an existing land use or regulatory plan, policy or ongoing operation the no project/no development alternative would be the continuation of the existing plan, policy or operation into the future; or 2) if the project is other than a land use or regulatory plan, such as a development project, the No Project - No Development alternative is the circumstance under which the project does not proceed. In certain circumstances, the No Project - No Development alternative is a no -build scenario where the existing environmental setting is maintained. The No Project - No Development Alternative was rejected because the Village is an existing Commercial District that is currently developed with a number of residential, commercial, professional office, and public facilities uses, but still has a number of vacant and underutilized properties that could be developed. Therefore, an analysis of where the existing environmental setting is maintained, is not a logical alternative to the proposed Village Build -out Plan. Substantial Evidence for Increased Density Alternative In studying the optimum build -out scenario for the Village Build -out Plan area, the City of La Quinta considered varying densities of residential and non-residential uses. One such alternative was to develop the project area with an additional 799,786 square feet of non- residential uses and up to 40 dwelling units to the acre where the proposed Build -out Plan calls for a maximum of 25 to 30 dwelling units to the acre. This alternative was considered and rejected because it would require an increase in the height of buildings greater than the 60 feet proposed in the Build -out Plan to reach the density of 40 dwelling units to the acre, which would be incompatible with the character of the Village. Findings for Rejecting Alternatives Regarding Alternatives that were considered and rejected, the City hereby makes the finding that the rejected No Project - No Development Alternative was not considered for further evaluation in the EIR because the Village is an existing Commercial District that still has a number of vacant and underutilized properties that could still be developed. Regarding the rejected Increased Density Alternative, the City hereby makes the finding that increasing density would require an increase in building heights, which would be incompatible with the character of the Village. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 56 October 2016 475 Findings Alternatives Considered for Analysis in the EIR After consideration of all alternatives, two were selected for further analysis for the proposed La Quinta Village Build -out Plan: 1. Alternative 1 — Buildout under the Existing Zoning Ordinance and La Quinta Village Design Guidelines 2. Alternative 2 — Reduced Village Build -out Plan Project Area Substantial Evidence for Alternative 1 - Buildout under the Existing Zoning Ordinance and La Quinta Village Design Guidelines Under this alternative, development in the Village Build -out Plan project area is the No -Project Alternative where the proposed Zoning Code amendments would not be adopted to allow for increased height and residential density that would create a more compact pedestrian friendly neighborhood, with residential, commercial and professional office space. In addition, under this alternative, projects would continue to be subject to the Village Design Guidelines which include a maximum building height of 45 feet. Under this alternative, 16 dwelling units per acre was assumed (Residential High Designation), 590,935 square feet of the Village Build -out Plan's non-residential uses, and a maximum of two - stories on new buildings (not including underground parking). These assumptions are based on the more traditional commercial district where each project is responsible for meeting its particular parking requirements on -site, and the Village Design Guidelines. The number of dwelling units was determined by using the Residential High Density (RH) designation (12-16 du/ac) per Zoning Code Chapter 9.50.020. A reduction of 445 new dwelling units and 208,851 square feet of non-residential uses would result in fewer vehicle trips, with a resulting reduction in air emissions. Impacts associated with vehicle trips can be reduced to less than significant levels through the development of traffic calming techniques such as round-abouts at key intersections and adding bicycle/golf cart lanes to provide options for residents and visitors to get out of their cars. Alternative 1 would result in a significant reduction in air emissions and greenhouse gas emissions, however, build -out under this alternative would still result in emissions of VOCs in exceedance of the SCAQMD threshold during long term operation (Air), and emissions of COz (GHG). The City's goal is to continue to develop the Village as a livable and sustainable neighborhood - reminiscent of older cities - where land uses are more interconnected, compact, and offer a mix of uses, providing opportunities for people to live, work, and shop within the neighborhood. This alternative would meet this goal, but not to the extent that the Village Build - out Plan would, as this alternative would only accommodate 2/3 of the population envisioned in the Plan and 3/4 of the new non-residential uses. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 57 October 2016 476 Findings Findings for Alternative 1 - Buildout under the Existing Zoning Ordinance and La Quinta Village Design Guidelines The City hereby makes the finding that Alternative 1 is not considered to be a superior alternative to the proposed project because: 1. Build -out under this alternative would still result in emissions of VOCs in exceedance of the SCAQMD threshold during long term operation (Air Quality), and emissions of CO2 (GHG). 2. This alternative does not meet the objective of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan to the same extent that the project does. This main objective of the Build -out Plan is: developing a livable and sustainable neighborhood where land uses are more interconnected, compact, and offer a mix of uses, providing a community for people to live, work, and shop within the neighborhood Substantial Evidence for Alternative 2 — Reduced Village Build -out Plan Project Area Under this alternative, development in the Village Build -out Plan project area would only occur on vacant properties. Properties that the City has identified as having the potential to be redeveloped under the Village Build -out Plan would remain developed with existing uses. Under this alternative, the intensity and density of new uses on vacant properties would be similar to those allowed under the Village Build -out Plan. Building Height — 60 feet Dwelling units at up to 30 units to the acre No Village Design Guidelines — architectural style considered on a project -by -project basis The Environmental Analysis of the proposed Village Build -out Plan concluded that there would be a significant and unavoidable impact on Air Quality associated with the generation of emissions of the following criteria pollutants — VOC, NOX and CO, and Global Climate Change associated with emissions of Greenhouse Gasses. Under Alternative 2, a 65 percent reduction in dwelling units and non-residential uses would result in a project that would not result in significant air quality impacts, but greenhouse gas emissions would still exceed the 3,000 MTCO2e GHG thresholds. Additionally, this alternative would not meet the City's goal of developing a livable and sustainable neighborhood that requires a population density substantially higher than what would be generated by this alternative. The environmentally superior alternative is Alternative 2, Reduced Village Build -out Plan Project Area, where only vacant properties would be developed, representing a 65 percent reduction in the number of dwelling units and square footage of non-residential uses. Alternative 2 would meet the City's goal to continue to develop the Village as a livable and sustainable Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 58 October 2016 477 Findings neighborhood - reminiscent of older cities - where land uses are more interconnected, compact, and offer a mix of uses, providing opportunities for people to live, work, and shop within the neighborhood; However, not to the extent that the Village Build -out Plan would because of the economy of scale required to upgrade the public facilities and infrastructure in the Village Build -out Plan area, including the proposed traffic calming elements such as replacing traditional four way stops with round-abouts, adding additional pedestrian amenities such as wider sidewalks and enhanced crosswalks (i.e. pedestrian activated crosswalk lights), upgrading the drainage system and upgrading the water and sewer lines to accommodate new growth. Findings for Alternative 2 - Reduced Village Build -out Plan Project Area The City hereby makes the finding that Alternative 2 is not considered to be a superior alternative to the proposed project because: 1. Build -out under this alternative would still result in emissions CO2 above the SCAQMD threshold (GHG). 2. This alternative does not meet the objective of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan to the same extent that the project does. This main objective of the Build -out Plan is: developing a livable and sustainable neighborhood where land uses are more interconnected, compact, and offer a mix of uses, providing a community for people to live, work, and shop within the neighborhood 2.9 Resolution Adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations The EIR has identified and discussed significant environmental effects, which will occur as a result of the proposed La Quinta Village Build -out Plan. With implementation of the mitigation measures in the EIR, these effects can be mitigated to levels considered less than significant except for significant, unavoidable project -specific and/or cumulative impacts in the areas of air quality, greenhouse gases, and traffic and circulation as described above in Section 2.4. Public Resources Code Section 21081 provides that no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been certified which identifies one of more significant effects on the environment that would occur if the project were carried out unless the agency makes specific findings with respect to those significant environmental effects. Where a public agency finds that economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, makes infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the EIR, and thereby leave significant unavoidable effects the public agency must also find that "specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects on the environment." Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 59 October 2016 478 Findings In making this determination, the Lead Agency is guided by CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, which provides as follows: a. CEQA requires the decision -making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." b. When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. c. If an agency makes a statement of overriding consideration, the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition, finding required pursuant to CEQA Section 15091. Having considered the unavoidable adverse impacts of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan, the City Council hereby determines that all feasible mitigation measures have been adopted to reduce or avoid the potentially significant impacts identified in the EIR, and that no additional feasible mitigation is available to further reduce significant impacts. Further, the City Council finds that economic, social and other considerations of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan outweigh the unavoidable adverse impacts described previously. In making this finding, the City Council has balanced the benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental impacts and has indicated its willingness to accept those risks. The following statements are in support of the City's action based on the EIR and/or other information in the record. The benefits from approving the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan include those related to the continued development of the area, at a greater intensity than previously considered, as a vital economic component to the City's fiscal well-being. The proposed project is appropriate because: The Village Build -out Plan would create a vibrant mixed use development with residential, retail, office and business park uses in the City that implements the vision, goals and policies of the General Plan Update for this area. Development of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan would create employment generating opportunities for the citizens of La Quinta. Based on projections, the project, at build -out, has the potential to add new jobs to the local economy. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 60 October 2016 479 Findings The type of development envisioned in the Village Build -out Plan would exhibit urban architecture and landscaping features utilizing state-of-the-art technologies that will help the Village's image as an employment center as well as a shopping and entertainment center. Development of the La Quinta Village Build -out plan would include a variety of traffic improvements and parking management strategies that will encourage alternative transportation methods such as pedestrian, bicycle, NEV, and shuttle services. Over time, the increase of alternative transportation has the potential to decrease air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, once developed, the Village Build -out Plan area can be used as an example for increasing alternative transportation methods throughout the City. The Village Build -out Plan provides clarity for future developers and land use regulators. The clearly defined standards and land use planning for catalyst projects will minimize future environmental review, time, and cost in the permit process. The Village Build -out Plan offers an opportunity to meet the community's growth needs; provides a balance of land uses that accommodates growth within available resources and service capacity, provides a range of commercial and residential uses to promote orderly economic development, improves the balance between jobs and housing, enhances the character or the area, provides recreational areas with amenities, balances the needs of the future residents with the needs of existing residents, and provides fiscal balance and public infrastructure. Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will further enhance the quality of life necessary to attract new residents, businesses and visitors to the City, and will generally promote increased investment and development, jobs associated with new and/or expanded construction, and the provision of public services and facilities for a larger population base, and further economic development within the City. The City Council further finds that except for the project, all other alternatives set forth in the EIR are infeasible because they would limit the realization of project objectives and of specific economic, social and other benefits to the same extent as the project, that this City Council finds outweigh any environmental benefits of the alternatives. In light of the foregoing, and in recognition of additional information contained within the EIR, the City of La Quinta City Council concludes that implementation of the La Quinta Village Build - out Plan will result in the development of a beneficial mix -use project as outlined above. The City Council further concludes that these benefits outweigh the significant, unavoidable environmental impacts associated with development of the Build -out Plan and, accordingly, adopts this State of Overriding Considerations. Village Build -Out Plan Findings of Fact 61 October 2016 480 ORDINANCE NO.553 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WITHIN THE VILLAGE BUILD OUT PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 20tn day of December, 2016, hold a duly noticed public hearing for review of a City -initiated request of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2016-0005 to modify Title 9 (Zoning) of the La Quinta Municipal Code to support the implementation of the Village Build -Out Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 6t" of December, 2016, hold a study session to review the Village Build -out Plan, Environmental Impact Report and Zone Text Amendments; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 22" d day of November, 2016, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for review of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2016-0005 to modify Title 9 (Zoning) of the La Quinta Municipal Code to support the implementation of the Village Build -Out Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2016-017 to recommend to the City Council adoption of said zoning text amendments; and WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice for this request in The Desert Sun newspaper on December 9, 2016, as prescribed by the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, Title 9 of the Municipal Code contains the chapters that address permitted uses, development standards, development review and permitting procedures; and WHEREAS, the proposed zoning text amendments are necessary to implement the goals and policies of the General Plan 2035 adopted by the City Council at their regular meeting on February 19, 2013; and the development anticipated in the Village Build -Out Plan; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify adoption of said Zoning Ordinance Amendment: 481 Ordinance No.553 Amendment to Title 9 Zoning - Village Build -out Plan Adopted: Page 2 of 4 1. Consistency with General Plan The zoning text amendments are consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan. The proposed amendments are supported by Policy LU-1.2, that all land use decisions shall be consistency with all applicable General Plan policies and programs and shall uphold the right and needs of property owners as well as those of the general public; Program LU-7.1.a, Establish a Mixed Use Overlay for all the commercial zoning designations; and Program LU-7.3.a, to amend the Zoning Ordinance to include standards for high density residential development within commercial zones. 2. Public Welfare Approval of the zoning text amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. The amendments implement the General Plan 2035 and do not incorporate any changes that affect the regulation and/or provision of public services, utility systems, or other foreseeable health, safety and welfare considerations. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. CHAPTER 9 shall be amended, as written in Exhibit A attached hereto. SECTION 2. The proposed zoning text amendment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (CEQA) as amended (Resolution 83-63). That the City Council has reviewed and considered the Environmental Impact Report for the Village Build -Out Plan (SCH #2015101019), and by adoption of Resolution 2016- , has adopted Findings and a Statement of Overriding Consideration and certified the EIR. SECTION 3. That the City Council does hereby approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2016-0005, as set forth in attached Exhibit "A" for the reasons set forth in this Ordinance. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. 482 Ordinance No.553 Amendment to Title 9 Zoning - Village Build -out Plan Adopted: Page 3 of 4 SECTION 31. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held this 201" day of December, 2016 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 483 Ordinance No.553 Amendment to Title 9 Zoning - Village Build -out Plan Adopted: Page 4 of 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LA QUINTA ) I, SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No. (enter number) which was introduced at a regular meeting on the (date) day of (month), (year), and was adopted at a regular meeting held on the (date) day of (month), (year), not being less than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof. I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the City of La Quinta as specified in the Rules of Procedure adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2014-013. SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California DECLARATION OF POSTING I, SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on , pursuant to Council Resolution. SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 484 EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 553 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WITHIN THE VILLAGE BUILD OUT PLAN • Twfnadiirti,aw, T�rn .„ -axamiciawff,xvtnr........ .. .■ .. WMIMME... .: .. .. :.. e . \. .. _. .. .• rtL.1QQR1 .. ... 2 W W.7 d .. ... \. .. .. .. .. ... .. M21MUMM"MIf"MVI.P. "I .. .. .. . : ... . : .: . :. ... .. . ■. Villwan A. —Purpose B. 9The purpose of the Village Commercial District is to develop The Village area as a year-round commercial, residential and recreational location, serving residents and guests of the greater La Quinta community, and to; A. Promote development standards to accommodate projects and activities which will provide goods, services and housing iR a design 485 environment supportive of the —concpq�set nip i inr he guidelines: promoting pedestrian accessibility r__and scale, maintaining connections to La Quinta's artistic and architectural heritage, and guiding design to acknowledge and embrace the desert environment. ((D d. �98T1, 2012; Ord. 323 § 3 (Exh. B), 1998) B. Permitted uses in the VC zoning district will combine urban living, essential day-to-day neighborhood goods and services, tourism and visitor -based retail and entertainment opportunities, and facilities necessary for the operational demands of such uses. C. Except as otherwise approved as part of a specific plan for the property, the uses permitted in the VC zoning district are listed in Table 9-5. 9.70.110 Permitted use Village Build -Out Plan Area. IMIN.. ._ al M PMM .... IN:-. ISIM... .. :.. IRYMMMMee -e a e•e ....... . A. Purpose. The Villaae Build -Out Plan Area is the area depicted in the map below. The purpose of the Village Build -Out Plan Area is to promote development and redevelopment of the Village by providing development standards that encourage the implementation of Mixed Use oroiects. pedestrian scale development and connectivity. and economic arowth. MIN 487 The Village Build -Out Plan Area is planned to contain the following build out assumptions. Although the market will dictate the actual intensities that are developed. this Table will be used by the Citv to monitor development activitv. Build -out Assumptions by Area Build -out Area Assumptions Existing/Future Existing/Future Residentia12 Non Res (sq ft)3 Ground floor East of commercial and Existing: 3 du Existing: 22,825 Bermudas residential above Future: 399 du Future: 302,531 50% res @20du/ac and Total: 402 du Total: 343,356 50% @25 du/ac West of Ground floor Navarro commercial and Existing: 23 du Existing: 7,200 50% 920du/ac and Future: 130 du Future: 21,800 50% 925 du/ac Total: 153 du Total: 29,000 sq ft Between Ground floor Existing: 6 du Navarro and commercial and Future: 59 du Existing: 11,000 Bermudas residential above Total: 65 du Future: 45,410 Total: 56,410 100% @25du/ac North of Calle Ground floor commercial and Existing: 251 du plus 290 hotel Existing: 98,500 Tampico residential above rooms Future: 346,465 100% @30 du/ac Future: 613 du Total: 444,965 Total: 864 du Misc Lots 1/2 2-story buildings Existing: 1 du Existing: 12,400 acre of less Commercial only, no Future: 0 du Future: 92,580 residential Total: 1 du Total: 104,980 TOTAL Existing:284 du Existing: 151,925 Future: 808,786 Future: 1,198 du Total: 1,482 du Total 960,711 Source: City f La Quinto Village Build -out Plan Land Use Data, August 2015. Notes: 1. Assumes new dwelling units will be developed over commercial uses, in multiple story buildings. 2. Assumes the existing dwelling units will remain in place. 3. Assumes that some existing non-residential buildings will be replaced with new buildings. B. Development Standards. Proiects in the Villaae Build -Out Plan Area are encouraged to implement the standards and incentives of Section 9.140.090, the Mixed Use Overlay. If the Mixed Use Overlay is not 488 implemented, projects proposed within the Village Build -Out Plan Area shall be subject to the development standards in the underlying zone contained in Table 9-6, with the following exceptions. a. The maximum density allowed in the Build -Out Plan Area is 25 units Der acre south of Calle Tampico. and 30 units Der acre north of Calle Tampico. �b.The maximum building height is 45 feet. Any proposed building height over 45 feet requires conditional use permit approval and shall not exceed a maximum building height of 60 feet. Building heights proposed above 45 feet must support the purpose and intent if the Village Build -Out Plan and be compatible with surrounding development and design. Any development proposal that exceeds 45 feet shall relate to adjacent single family residential districts by stepping down the scale, height, and density of buildings at the edges of the project adjacent to less intense development. Buildings at any height cannot be monolithic, and must include variations in vertical planes, view corridors or openings or other features to reduce the mass and scale of structures. 9.90.040 Table of development standards. Table 9-6 and the illustrations in Section 9.90.050 set forth standards for the development of property within nonresidential districts. Notwithstanding Table 9-6, different standards shall apply if special zoning symbols, described in Section 9.20.030, are designated on the official zoning map. Table 9-6 Nonresidential Development Standards District Development Standard CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC Minimum —Maximum n/a n/a n/a 1-20 n/a n/a n/a building site (acres) n/a Maximum building height 35 (ft.) ° 50 35 40 35 40 40 40 45 Maximum number of 2- stories 4 2 3 2 3 3 3 n/a Maximum floor area ratio (FAR) 35 .50 .30 .25 .25 .30 n/a n/a Minimum From Highway perimeter 111 right -of- 50/50 50/50 50/50 n/a n/a n/a n/a building/ way' n/a landscape From all 30/20 30/20 30/20 30/20 30/20 30/20 30/20 489 setbacks image n/a (in ft.)`' corridor rights -of -ways (except Hwy 111) and from all major and primary arterials From all other perimeter street rights- 20/10 20/10 20/10 20/10 20/10 20/10 20/10 n/a of -way' From residential districts and 50/10 50/10 50/10 30/155 30/155 30/155 30/15' PR, OS and GC 10/0 districts' Minimum setback from interior property lines 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 within the some project Parking and signs See Chapters 9.150 and 9.160 Fences and walls See Section 9.100.030 Landscaping and See Sections 9.100.040 and 19.100.050 screening Notes: ' All minimum perimeter setbacks shall be increased one foot for every foot in height that building is above thirty-five feet. Mixed use projects and projects in the Village Build -Out Plan Area are exempt from this requirement. z FAR means the gross floor area of all buildings divided by the building site area. 3 See General Plan Exhibit II-4. 4 Landscape setback shall consist of landscaped area within the building setback. Number given is minimum landscaped setback from the street right-of-way. The remaining building setback may contain parking, driveways and similar facilities. In addition to above landscape setbacks, interior landscaping shall be required as a percentage of the net project area as follows: parking areas: minimum five percent; nonparking areas: minimum five percent (also see Section 9.100.050). 5 For buildings over one story in CN, CT and CO districts, setbacks shall be increased to 40/20. 6 Not including basements. Also, notwithstanding above table, the maximum structure height equals twenty-two feet for all buildings within one hundred fifty feet of any general plan image corridor and major or primary arterials. Except in the Village Build -Out Plan Area, where the provisions of 9.70.110 shall agply. 490 9.140.090 MU Mixed Use Overlay regulations. A. Purpose. To facilitate the development of mixed use projects that include both multi -family residential and commercial components in a cohesively designed and constructed manner. The mixed use overlay district will contribute to vehicle trip and associated air pollutant reductions by locating residents in close proximity to services, employment, and transportation hubs, and by providing interconnected multi -purpose paths for alternative modes of transportation. B. Applicability. 1. The MU overlay district and the provisions of this section apply to all areas designated VC, CR, CP, CC, CN, CT and CO districts. These regulations shall apply in addition to the regulations of the underlying base district. In case of conflict between the base district and the MU regulations, the MU regulations shall control. C. Definitions. See Chapter 9.280. D. Permitted Uses. 1. Any use permitted or conditionally permitted in the underlying district. 2. Mixed Use projects consisting of both multi -family residential (apartments, condominiums, and similar housing types) and commercial/office components. E. Development Standards. 1. Mixed use projects shall include both a commercial and/or office component and a multi -family residential component, which are fully integrated with regard to access, connectivity, and public safety. Residential uses with a density of 12 to 24 units, must comprise a minimum of 35% of the total square footage of the proposed project. Mixed use projects can be designed vertically (residential development over commercial development) or horizontally (residential development next to commercial development). 2. Minimum lot sizes shall be one (1) acre. To maximize design options, development of mixed use projects on lot assemblages or lots greater than one (1) acre is encouraged. 3. The use of vacant pads for mixed use projects in existing commercial development along Highway 111 is encouraged. 4. Minimum densities for residential development shall be 12 dwelling units per acre. 5. Maximum densities for residential development shall be 24 dwelling units per acre. Higher densities may be achieved through density bonuses, where applicable. 6. The residential component of Mixed Use projects shall be subject to the setback requirements of the underlying commercial district. 491 7. Maximum height. A Mixed Use project may be up to 25% more in height than in the base district, if approved in the Site Development Permit. Mixed Use Overlay District Maximum Building Height Underlying District Maximum Height CR 60 feet CP 45 feet CC 40 feet CN 35 feet VC 4-5-45 feet*,** CT 55 feet CO 55 feet x In the VC underlying district, when a minimum of 1/2 the required parking spaces are located beneath the principal mixed use structure, the number of stories shall be measured from the finished floor of the building's ground floor and shall not include the parking level. ** Building height from 46 to 60 feet may be permitted with approval of a CUP. See Section 9.70.110. 8. Floor Area Ratio (FAR). Mixed Use projects are exempt from the floor area ratio requirements of the underlying district. 9. The first (ground) floor of a multi -story Mixed Use project located within 300 feet of the Highway 111 right of way shall consist of commercial and/or office development. Residential uses on the first (ground) floor are prohibited. 10. New buildings (constructed after the date of approval of this Code) in Mixed Use projects shall not be longer than 300 feet to facilitate convenient public access around the building. 11. Pedestrian, bicycle, and other non -motorized travel connections, including sidewalks, trails, and/or crosswalks, are required between the commercial/office and residential components of the project, as well as leading to/from street fronts, bus stops, public gathering places, and adjacent properties. They shall be located off-street and separated from vehicle travel lanes and parking lot driving aisles. 12. Physical barriers, such as walls and fences, between the commercial/office and residential components of a Mixed Use project are discouraged. However, they may be used where necessary and appropriate, including for public safety or the screening of outdoor storage facilities. May, 13. Public spaces. a. Public gathering spaces that provide active and/or passive amenities for passers-by are highly encouraged. Communal spaces may include but are not limited to pedestrian plazas, shaded benches, public art, and landscape or hardscape features. b. Public spaces should be centrally located or located near active land uses to assure their frequent usage and safety. 14. Parking. Parking and loading requirements shall be in conformance with Section 9.150 of this Code, subject to the following provisions: a. Opportunities for shared and/or reduced parking between the commercial/office and residential components of the project are encouraged, subject to the requirements of Section 9.150.070 (Shared Parking), as a means to better match parking demand with availability during various hours of the day. b. Mixed use projects shall provide preferred parking for electric vehicles and vehicles using alternative fuels in accordance with Section 9.150.110. 15. Bicycle racks shall be provided to serve both commercial/office and residential components of the project, and shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 9.150. 16. Landscaping shall comply with Section 9.100.40 of this Code and the requirements of the underlying district. Additional landscaping may be required to minimize impacts to adjacent properties. 17.Outdoor lighting shall comply with Sections 9.100.150 and 9.60.160 of this Code. 18.Signage shall be in conformance with Chapter 9.160 of this Code and the requirements of the underlying district. Monument and other signage that enhances the cohesion of the development may be required. 19. Entry drive. An entry drive that provides principal vehicular access into the residential component of the project is required. 20. Entry Statement. Projects with fifty (50) or more residential units shall include vehicular and pedestrian entry statements that convey a sense of arrival into the development. Examples include, but are not limited to, specimen trees, boulder groupings, textured or stamped concrete, and monument signage. 21.Special attention shall be given to the use of aesthetic treatments, such as colored/textured paving or decorative gates, that contribute to the overall image and connectivity of the development. 493 22. New Mixed Use development shall relate to adjacent single family residential districts in the following ways: a. By stepping down the scale, height, and density of buildings at the edges of the project adjacent to less intense development. Step the building down at the ends or sides nearest a single family unit, to a height similar to that of the adjacent single family unit (or of typical single family residences in the vicinity if adjacent to an undeveloped single family zoning district). b. By incorporating architectural elements and materials that are similar to those used in the neighborhood. c. By locating parking areas within the project interior or at the side or back when necessary to achieve the "residential front yard" appearance. d. By avoiding, wherever feasible, the construction of walls on local streets in existing neighborhoods where the wall would be located opposite front yards. F. Mixed Use Incentives. 1. Mixed use projects that provide a minimum of 30% of total project square footage for retail uses shall receive a density bonus of 10% for the residential component of the project. 2. Mixed use projects that include pedestrian, bicycle and golf cart circulation and facilities (paths, shaded parking, etc.) separate from vehicular circulation and facilities can reduce their vehicle parking requirement by 15%. 3. Development proposals for mixed use projects shall receive expedited entitlement and building permit processing. 4. Mixed use projects shall receive a ten (10) percent reduction in plan check and inspection fees. 5. Mixed use projects that include a minimum of two (2) public spaces or gathering features, as deemed of sufficient size and purpose by the city, shall receive a density bonus of up to fifteen (15) percent. 9.150.050 Determination of spaces required. A. Method of Determination. Off-street vehicle parking requirements shall be determined and provided in accordance with this section when the subject building or structure is constructed or a use is established or changed. In determining such off-street parking requirements, the city may use the alternative methods described in this section. The city reserves the option of requiring the use of more than one of these methods, depending on the type, size and mix of uses in a proposed development. 494 B. In the Village Ce erEiA-1 distr+ctBuild-Out Plan Area, a reduction of 50% is allowed, and any variation ofn the parking standard can be approved by the Director. No additional off-street parking is required for a change in nonresidential use. Development projects must demonstrate that they can provide all of the parking for residential development on -site, and a minimum of half the required spaces for commercial development on -site. Parking spaces required but not provided on -site can be provided through the preparation of a parking plan that can include: a. Use of on -street parking spaces immediately adjacent to the project. b. A shared parking agreement with adjacent property owner. c. A fair share contribution to the In Lieu fee program. d. An allocation of ovG4Gblesurplus parking spaces fr�e from ninety percent of the Village Parking Study execTparking supply at high season peak, as annually updated by the City, if on -site parking provided for non-residential land use on the project site is contractually dedicated as public shared parking, and signage is provided to allow public parking on the project site. tee. Other methods approved in a Site Development Permit. �C. Alternative Methods. Section 9.150.060 specifies the standard number of parking spaces required for most land uses. This schedule is required unless the applicant can show to the satisfaction of the city decision -making authority that it does not apply. Other alternative methods herein below may then be employed to determine the required parking spaces: 1. A recognized authority's shared parking methodology for calculating the peak demand over time for parking in a development of mixed uses using the same parking facilities as specified in Section 9.150.070; 2. A city methodology for calculating the parking demand for extremely complex or unusual uses or combinations of uses for which the standard schedule, a recognized authority's methodology and/or verifiable data are not applicable. Some or all of the following factors may be utilized in this methodology: expected numbers of occupants, employees, customers or visitors, vehicles stationed on the site, service and loading spaces required, handicapped spaces required, emergency access considerations and use of parking by unauthorized vehicles. C.D. Parking In -Lieu Program;^ Village Overlay District.. The city may permit required parking spaces in the Village OverlGy-Build-Out Plan Area to be reduced through execution of a parking agreement, subject to the following requirements: 495 1. A binding agreement, recorded against the property, between this city and the property owner. The agreement shall contain, at a minimum, all of the following: a. The agreement shall be binding upon the parties thereto, their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall run with the land; b. A payment schedule with a payment period not exceeding four years. If an assessment/benefit or parking improvement district is established, the obligation of the property owner shall become due and payable under the terms of such district; c. A cash mitigation payment. The amount per space shall be established as determined by the planning and public works development departmontcdivisions, plus an inflation factor. The amount will be calculated at the time of agreement execution. 2. An irrevocable offer from the property owner to participate in any future assessment/benefit or parking improvement district that may be formed in the VC or MU overly districts. 3. The money collected may be released to a city -created parking assessment/benefit or parking improvement district, or may be used in the furtherance of general parking improvements in the VC or MU overlay districts, at the option of the city. Any financial obligation issued against such property shall be reduced accordingly to the amount of mitigation money paid at the time of the district formation. 4. The property owner shall secure the mitigation payment by providing the city with a second deed of trust in the amount of the total mitigation payment. D-.E. Incentive Based Parking Adjustments. In all districts, the following may result in a reduction in parking spaces of up to 15%, subject to approval by the planning commission: 1. Permanent, non -vegetation shade structures covering 50% of all parking spaces. 2. Increased landscaping and public spaces. 3. Pedestrian improvements not located in the right of way or project driveways. 4. Vehicular and non -vehicular connections between projects. 5. Use of pervious surfaces for drainage, or creative drainage solutions. 6. New commercial and mixed use development providing preferred parking locations for electric and other alternative fuel vehicles. 7. Developments that provide a minimum of two (2) parking spaces or 1% of the minimum number of spaces, whichever is greater, for golf carts and neighborhood electric vehicles (NEV) -•. shall receive a parking credit reduction equal to 5 percent (5%) of the standard parking spaces required for that development. 9.200.080 Permit expiration and time extensions. A. Period of Validity. The period of validity for a development review permit shall begin on the permit's effective date as set forth in Section 9.200.060. The period of validity shall run pursuant to subsection C of this section. B. Establishment. A development review permit shall be deemed established if the following actions occur within twenty-four months of the effective date of the approval or within such other time period designated by the approval: 1. In the case of a development review permit where ministerial permits are required, such permits have been issued. 2. In the case of a development review permit where no ministerial permits are required, the use authorized by the permit has been established. In circumstances where a certificate of occupancy is required, such certificate has been issued. C. Expiration. A development review permit shall expire and be of no further force or effect if: 1. The permit is not established within twenty-four months of the permits effective date or such other time period designated by the permit approval, by state law or by this code; or 2. After establishment, the use or activity for which the permit was approved is discontinued or abandoned for a period of one year. D. Time Extensions. 1. Upon application before expiration of the period of validity, the original decision -making authority may grant an extension to the period of validity for up to two years if it finds that such an extension is justified by the circumstances of the project. The filing of an application for extension shall stay expiration of the permit until action is taken on the time extension by the decision -making authority unless the application has been deemed incomplete and inactive pursuant to Section 9.200.070(B). Development reyio,n, normitc rnn he ovtondwi nn mnro thnn tWir o 2. Projects not requiring a time extension may be constructed in accordance with the requirements and standards in effect at the time of permit approval provided the construction complies with all project conditions of approval and all laws in effect at the time of the permit approval. However, any project or permit requiring a time extension shall conform to the requirements and standards in effect at the time the extension is granted. E. Amendments to Development Review Permits. MOYA 1. Content of Amendments. Permit amendments are required for substantial revisions to conditions of approval, alterations to approved plans which are more substantial than the modifications provided for in Section 9.200.090 new or additional land uses, or similar major changes. 2. Procedures. A development review permit may be amended any number of times by the approval of a subsequent application. All permit amendments shall be for the same parcel or property for which a development review permit was previously approved. Amendments shall be filed prior to the expiration of the previously approved permit in compliance with the same filing procedures and payment of the fee required for an amendment. Amendments shall be processed in the same manner as an original application. (Ord. 538 § 6, 2016; Ord. 489 § 1, 2011; Ord. 325 § 1, 1998; Ord. 284 § 1, 1996) ATTACHMENT 1 The Village Build -out Plan Final Environmental Impact Report State Clearing House No. 2015101019 City of La Quinta, California Lead Agency: City of La Quinta Planning Division 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Prepared by: The Altum Group 73-710 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 G The Altum Group November 2016 ff I' 500 Table of Contents Chapter F.1 Introduction................................................................................................F.1-1 F.1.1 Purpose............................................................................................................... F.1-1 F.1.2 Organization of the Final EIR.............................................................................. F.1-1 Chapter F.2 Comments and Responses...........................................................................F.2-1 Chapter F.3 Revisions to the Draft EIR............................................................................F.3-1 F.3.1 Revisions in Reponse to Comments Received .................................................... F.3-1 Chapter F.4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program............................................F.4-1 Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Final EIR i November 2016 501 F.1 INTRODUCTION F.1 INTRODUCTION F.1.1 Purpose This Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan. Prior to approving the project, the City of La Quinta as the lead agency must consider the Final EIR along with the Draft EIR and any comments received during the public review process, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). The City may certify the EIR only if it finds on the basis of the whole record before it (including the Draft EIR and any comments received), that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment that cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level, or that findings have been made that the proposed project has certain beneficial impacts that outweigh the significant environmental effects of the project. The Final EIR, including the Draft EIR, reflects the lead agency's independent judgment and analysis. The City of La Quinta prepared this Final EIR in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.); the State "Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act" (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000, et seq., State CEQA Guidelines); and the City of La Quinta CEQA Guidelines. F.1.2 Organization of the Final EIR The Final document includes the following information: • Chapter F.1 Introduction to the Final EIR; • Chapter F.2 A list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Draft EIR, comment letters and responses to comments; and • Chapter F.3 Errata explaining revisions to the Draft EIR made in response to comments; and • Chapter F.4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Final EIR F.1-1 November 2016 502 F.1 INTRODUCTION The Final and Draft documents are available for review at the following location: City of La Quinta Community Development Department 78495 Calle Tampico Phone: 760-777-7125 Hours: Monday — Thursday 7:30 am — 5:00 pm and Friday 8:00 am — 5:00 pm. La Quinta Library 78275 Calle Tampico Phone: 760-564-4767 Hours: Monday — Thursday 10:00 am — 7:00 pm, Friday and Saturday 10:00 am — 6:00 pm, and Sunday 12:00 pm — 4:00 pm. The documents are also available at the City's website at www. la-quinta.org. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Final EIR F.1-2 November 2016 503 F.2 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES F.2 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES This section includes the comment letters received on the Draft EIR. Each comment letter is labeled with a unique number and comments within each letter are numbered consecutively. For example, the letter from the Coachella Valley Water District is labeled Letter 3 and the first comment in this letter is labeled 3-1. The City of La Quinta received a total of five (5) comment letters from state, regional and local agencies. The following list provides the name of the commenter along with his/her affiliation, the date the letter was sent and the page number where the comment letter begins. Comment Letters Letter No. Author/Affiliation Date Page No. 1 Scott Morgan, Director, Governor's Office of Sep 23, 2016 2 Planning and Research — State Clearinghouse 2 Paul Rull, ALUC Urban Regional Planner IV, Aug 10, 2016 5 Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission 3 Steve Bigley, Director of Environmental Sep 8, 2016 7 Services — Coachella Valley Water District 4 Katie Croft, Archaeologist, Agua Caliente Band Sep 22, 2016 21 of Cahuilla Indians 5 Donald Vargas, Environmental Regulatory Sep 22, 2016 23 Compliance Administrator, Imperial Irrigation District La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Final EIR F.2-1 November 2016 504 Letter 1 STATE OF CALMORNI--A., p GovERNQR'S OFFICE of PLANNING AND RESEARCH 'P° ,• STATE CLEARINGHOUSE AND PLANNING UNIT MMUND G. BROWN JR. GDVEkxpR September23,20i6 RECEIVED Nicole Criste City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Subject: La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan SCH#: 2015101019 Dear Nicole Criste; SEP 3 0 2016 CITY uh LA,4WNTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ,�f��OF C0.LfFdQ�py KEPT ALEx DmEmF The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Draft EIR to selected state agencies for review. The review period closed on September 22, 2016, and no state agencies submitted comments by that date. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please call the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. If you have a question about the above -named project, please refer to the ten -digit State Clearinghouse number when contacting this office. Sincerely, Scott. rgan Director, State Clearinghouse 140010th Street P.O. Box 3044 Sacramento, California 95812-3044 (916) 445-0613 FAX (916) 323-3018 www.opr.ca.gov 505 Document Details Report State Clearinghouse Data Base SCH# .2015101019 Project Title La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Lead Agency La Quinta, City of Type EIR Draft EIR Description The City of La Quinta has undertaken a planning process to develop a build -out plan for the Village, its traditional downtown. The project area consists of approximately 137 acres of land, generally located south of Calls Tampico, east of Elsenhawer Drive and west of Washington Street. In addition, the 9.3 acre property at the northwest comer of Celle Tampico and Washington Street, currently developed as a commercial center, is included in the project area. There are approximately 20 acres of vacant land in the project area that could be developed with a mix of uses - commercial, professional, and/or residential. Future development in the project area assumes development of the remaining vacant properties, as well as redevelopment of underutilized properties with more intensive uses_ Lead Agency Contact Name Nicole Criste Agency City of La Quinta Phone (760) 777-7132 Fax email Address 78495 Celle Tampico P.O. Box 1504 City La Quinta State CA Zip 92253 Project Location County Riverside City La Quints Region Let/Long 33° 40' 34.1" N / 116° 18' 18.9" W Cross Streets Washington Street and Celle Tampico Parcel No. Township 6S Range 716E Section 116 Base SBB&M Proximity to: Highways No Airports No Railways No Waterways La Quints Evacuation Channel Schools Land Use Village Commercial, Recreational Open Space, Major Community Facilities, General Commercial Project Issues Agricultural Land; Air Quality; Archaeologic -Historic; Biological Resources; Drainage/Absorption; Forest Land/Fire Hazard; Geologic/Seismic: Minerals; Noise; Population/Housing Balance; Public Services; RecreationlParks; Schools/Universities; Sewer Capacity; Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading; Solid Waste; Toxic/Hazardous; TrafficlCirculation; Water Quality; Water Supply; Growth Inducing; Landuse; Cumulative Effects; AestheticA/isual Reviewing Resources Agency; Department of Fish and Wildlife, Region 6; Department of Parks and Recreation; Agencies Department of Water Resources; Caitrans, District 8; Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 7; Native American Heritage Commission Date Received O8/0912016 Start of Review O810912016 End of Review 09/2212016 1f Letter 1 State Clearinghouse, September 30, 2016 Letter summarizes the State Clearinghouse (SCH) policy for disseminating the Draft EIR to State Agencies and that the City has complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements. Comment letters that were attached to the SCH letter have been numbered separately and are included following Letter 1. No response to SCH is necessary. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Final EIR F.2-4 November 2016 507 Letter 2 From: Nicole Criste To: Nancy Ferguson Subject: FW: La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR transmittal ALUC response Date: Thursday, August 11, 2016 12:47:30 PM Nancy, For your files and the RTC. Nicole Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 777-7125 From: Rull, Paul [mailto:PRull@rctlma.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 11:08 AM To: Nicole Criste Subject: La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR transmittal ALUC response Hi Nicole, Thank you for your transmittal for the above referenced project. The project is located outside 2-1 the boundaries of any Airport Influence Area and therefore does not require ALUC review. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Paul Rull ALUC Urban Regional Planner IV Riverside County Airport Land Use Conin,ission 4080 Lemon Street, .i 4- Floor Riverside, Ca 92501 (951) 95 -693 (' 1) 955 177 (fax) PRULL RCTLMA.0R 508 Letter 2 Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission, August 10, 2016 Comment 2-1 Thank you for your transmittal for the above referenced project. The project is located outside the boundaries of any Airport Influence Area and therefore does not require ALUC review. Response 2-1 No response is required, as stated by ALUC, the project is located outside of the Airport Influence Area. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Final EIR F.2-6 November 2016 509 Letter 3 Z Established in 1918 as a public agency Coachella Valley Water District Directors: John P Powell Jr„ President - Div. 3 Jim Barrett, General Manager Peter Nelson, Vice President - Dlv. 4 Robert Cheng, Assislanl General Manager G. Patrick O'Dowd - Div. 1 Sylvia Bermudez, Clerk of the Board Ed Pack . Div. 2 Cdstulo R. Estrada - Div. 5 Best Best & Krieger LLP, Attorneys Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta 78-495 Calie Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mrs. Sauviat Criste: September 8, 2016 SEP 12 2016 Files: 1150,14 T' CITY 0I' L_'"- rommkINT nFVE',1Q P1ti+11FNT Subject: City of La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Thank you for affording the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) the opportunity to review the Draft EIR for the subject project. CVWD provides domestic water, wastewater, recycled water, irrigation/drainage., regional stormwater protection and groundwater management services to a population of nearly 300,000 throughout the Coachella Valley. CVWD submits the following comments regarding your project. Domestic Water Please address CVWD's 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan (as it relates to projects within 3-1 or affecting La Quinta). Please visit www.cvwd.orsx to review the 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan provided within CVWD's Operating Budget. • The Draft EIR should note that CVWD is embarking on a multi -year construction program to construct new infrastructure and facilities for the treatment of Chromium-6 at 3-2 a number of existing and future domestic water wells within the Coachella Valley including the city of La Quinta. Irrigation • Within the project area, CVWD owns and operates two (2) Irrigation Laterals: 120.8 and 120.8-2.0. A copy of the plan and survey drawing sheets 2117 and 2237 are enclosed for reference, as well as, an aerial map of the Lateral 120.8 System. The potential exists for 3-3 a non -potable water connection to the La Quinta City Park. CVWD recommends ' contacting Ty Mull, Engineer, at (760) 398-2661 to discuss this opportunity. Nicole Sauviat Criste 2 September 8, 2016 City of La Quinta Stormwater The flood protection measures for local drainage [described in Section 5.8 of the Draft EIR] are required to comply with California Drainage Law and provide that stormwater 3-4 flows are received onto, and discharged from, the project area[s] in a manner that is reasonably compatible with pre -development conditions. Planning and Special Pro }rank The development lies within the study area of CV WD's 2010 Coachella Valley Water Management Plan Update. The goal of this Water Management Plan is to assure groundwater basin sustainability. Each new development incrementally impacts the region's water supplies and the groundwater basin. The elements of the Water 3-5 Management Plan include supplemental imported water, source substitution and water conservation. The Water Management Plan lists specific actions for reducing overdraft. The elements and actions described in the Plan shall be incorporated into the design of this development to reduce its negative impact on the Coachella Valley groundwater basin. • This project [La Quinta Village Build -out Plan] is subject to the City's Landscape Ordinance which was adopted in accordance with the State's Model Water Efficient 3-6 Landscape Ordinance and CVWD's Ordinance 1302.1 as amended. The purpose of these ordinances is to establish effective water efficient landscaping requirements for newly installed and rehabilitated landscapes. Sanitation The following text is suggested for revision. New text is underscored and deleted text is strieken. Draft E1R page 5-15.1, Section 5.15.2 Existing Conditions, Wastewater Collection and Treatment. Sanitary sewer collection and treatment facilities are provided by the Coachella Valley Water District within most of the city. There are two CV WD wastewater treatment plants that serve La 3-7 Quinta. Water Reclamation Plant 7 (WRP-7) is located at Madison Street and Avenue 38, northeast of the city of Indio. It provides wastewater treatment for development in La Quinta north of Miles Avenue. The capacity of WRP-7 is 5 million gallons per day (mgd), and the plant processes approximately 2.8 to 3.0 mgd. it has the eaparity to expand to 7.5 • d. Currently, there is sufficient capacity; therefore, although expansion capacity exists, no such plans are proposed at this time. Nicole Sauviat Criste 3 September 8, 2016 City of La Quinta The Mid -Valley Water Reclamation Plant (WRP-4), located in Thermal (11.8 miles southeast of the Village), serves the area in La Quinta located south of Miles Avenue including the Village Build -out Plan project area. The WRP-4 has a current capacity of 9!9 ust ,,, der 10 mgd, and processes approximately 4-5-mgd per day. 3-7 plwis lbt• © paii ion at t K.A:d Valley plat ' WRR-4 does not include tertiary treatment con't facilities, CVWD indicates that such facilities could be located at this plant in the future should demand warrant. CVWD sewer lines utilize a system of trunk lines ranging in diameter from 8 to 42 4-to 24 ; , .,,t- e Fs .inches. There are ,Q iffe ,., StreetMa ein, Street, ant A.Ventles 5 }, 58 and-60. Existing sewer line infrastructure are currently in place in the project area. CVWD may need additional facilities to provide for the orderly expansion of its sanitation systems. These facilities may include additional gravity pipelines or lift station(s) expansion and facilities. If you have any questions, please call Luke Stowe, Environmental Supervisor at (760) 398-2651, extension 2545, Sincerely, Steve Bigley Director of Environmental Services Enclosures/3/as EM: it/ENV SVCSIENV120l&SEPT/CVWD comment ]tr LQ Village BuildOut EIR.doc 77 �,• �yt o.i,a ' a r It . �r�l�y r ' � �yy Niavfham l m 1,C:wir M:r - _ -� t• � i�1C J� ,. r� J - �+ . b>rvi r7 V pHr ' l+ � l■ r+ r� � � � , � fir(+": �, Mv hJ ^ e r I I 0C � R V tiAMC:. r - • '7 � uid'•�� rr Cyr � hf�'■i .j'l e � 1 w.1. "4 ,*jl �kv 1 �^ �� ,a I �j�l�f�i i.�.; fi'rM""y� i s-_ ��Ys*VIrv71# .y+c• ^� J � � � � N IJ c 1111C f •m r. yj��y O IL 'n1i74d �+ �i� o ♦OLr I � � I r R+ � r �AiI11C _ "il ire �� r � ..v,•� � ► ,.[�. _' r[� ~�� 4s �.I ayM �, a t< � __.4,..� i.-t.>1 �•r[ '�F ' �" �; t 4% `' � � � ""fir' � ■ r 4 w r " + 1 w ■ � • � �4� hliitAi K i ice. j 3 lkl r Legend Location I 1 I I JEFFERSOH ST. 10- e ! ADAMS ST, +N F I ;tAlr. rsag-sa ��yFr +� WA$Mr7NGTON ST.. L w a �l O R 7E. RBE N Irl a � � d Fr � R o � n y ~ v � V.R d \ Q g N 2<1 ,fie, p 2 r'DEL, 120.8.0.8-0.8r a �i 'fr4oq �' oeL u-0.e-oa-00' ? yllnh 8 N•LAT; IFO.BW-8 2 .-- 'SLAT•110.e•0.7 �I�b--rbEC. 1P0.8.O.e-P - \ R�p'WISGED 0 `-ISEE.25953 V 9 DEL.. rFQe•lo-ar-..�,. L►r. r210.e-Lo-,, •_ a3 aI • D LAT, WO.I-, M1 � r N C 4 y J g LAT. as -,a v f8" .A . 12ae-S... r` " R DEL r@D.a•15-0.4, "5 +oEL. o.a-S. i r2o.a 0-A3 t LAT. r car aaD.4kYSl.3- rrrr`aa.a[. 'LAC A2b.0-STAptDO' -� 90 .DEL r,TO 8.2 0 P o.ol •, 5' /� sFE I �q. P+I II lOCL. 120.8 is a[ ro DEL. axae•s0$.1- @ VeL.leo.e-ea•5, jI ix' I �✓ •BIQ 1 } Aul 1AVe•23 a r`�F a� a �L 1 /i.1S . gl r o� 141 C 100. LAr 40,0 , fAr5,1Fo.e- 1 DEL 0-STA a -QC. ,2D.e e. II V-r+� Pea-24"�� xArc.l , �•'1; �k T e.+� I uy `DEL. f2Q8.2.01 DEL JZO.8-233 0.3 �~ DEL I-CO-D,3 S0 ••5l.AT. AEGle-2.8 oEL. reo.e•t.3FoD z � IaHro --- AD \ DEL 1Fo8-to-too La ouinta f �. REFERENCE DRAWINGS LATERAL 120.a-STA_Oi00 TO ETa iO4+7759 AX•PROFSLE________________�12-D-795e LATERAL 120.a-STA. *4+77.59 ►14 TO STA. 205429.IS-PROFILE---------- _-21Y-0.7449 LATERAL, 200- 03; DELIVERIES IZO.I-O.1 LT, IRO.0-03 LT., 120E-05 LT.,12o a•Oa IT, IPO 5-o 5-o5 AII - PROF ILES---------------- EI2-D-TIT9 LATERALS 120.8-0.8, 120.B-OS API. 120.8.08.O.B-0.5 LT.- OELIYER I ES I20.8-0,e-4.2 CL. -AND IPO-a-a 8-08 RT -PROFILES- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _YI2-0-r980 LATERALS 1208-10 AND 120 a-L5-OELIVEW, P206-15-03LT.- PROFILE S----------- -----------------------�-"---- -- -'-__212-D-7981 LATERAL "I-2.0 AND DELIVERY 120.B-2.0-0.2 LT--PROFILES___-_-______212-D• 79a2 LATERAL 120.8-2.0-0.2 AND DELIVERY 120.8-2-0-0.2-0.5- PROFILES_______-_212-0-7783 LATERALS I�O.a-2.3,120.8-2.3-0, S. Ito.8-3.0,IE0.8-3�5,120. 0-;.$ DELIVERIES RC.I-P.3-0.3 LT_, AN 120.I-9.01 LT.-PAOFILZ------------212-D-T984 CD_ACH_ELL_A_ VALLEY COUNTY WATERuOtSTRICT IMRROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.1 BOUNDARY '` ae9r -a I (dY_ Ir°+94g-1 S oAzaY ,va ka pbee, T-- 9 89 J rrld�Br"S 'r r� FY4/kYf, fib � • ft�% gAra�i /.tAM/j ulf./;'dyl. r2Y• acI 1_1 70. OtoO _ •DEL r2a.6-F-a-QP�S Q'f,oah `� DEL. r20.e -FA•Q[-Qe r� I i- z a �I xl h 4y EXPLANATION stAT+oH lido*( IIAM[1YR PIPE LINE ' 181- LINE METER -- V EN-r STAND PIPE STAND 30156 METER STAND MANHOLE MANHOLE AND BLOWOFF PIPE DRAIN -• PIPE VENT --- 8-VALVE .* 12'AND LARGER VALVE -X- 8-CHECK, VALVE ' TEE SEND •%_' FUTURE DEVELOPMENT �3 RESERVNR + PUMPING PLANT 9A CANAL TURNOUT NOTES For Survey Alinement, see @IF-D-7995. Structure lacotlans net 14 Scale. 7 +8- "Is _ f3-8•Fv •tee l+r_sr 7-�•nz ,p�k: sy3a Aevrr_r I.iurc7vl,. r� sw,a ee�J w.LM xCW.li. ZTE0 are rev OfPAFTMENr OF rME !NT[RIOR WMAO OF RftLAMAWON GOOLDER CANYON PROJwr COACO-WLLA VALLrY 01SrR19VrY04 $YSTEN ywr No. B LATERAL 120.8 AND SU8LATERALS GENERAL PLAN PIPE ALINEMENT, AND Sf1iUCTURES iRAO(8_.-�•R�v_____R600MMEM0£a. �.�y�� CMECM£D1' rGPJl�.____APPRDV[O--_Kill DEA114R, EDLO*.00. NOV P , 19$2 42,12 - D - T 9 5 7 EISLID +B}- e0o 2117 `'l 17 514 CURVE DATA ir, q R- r-7649 CURVE 04TA 1 0 T.WJ9 L- 243 26' CURVE VATA A--6'24'01;'5'LT L-219,04 DE 7"A IL f DETAIL 2 DE TA IL 3 3,35 dii' llWA-5`RF R. D. W. 160 �00-31 8K I coll LAT PETAIL 4 po_ R" AP T4r4T94 EA T. -,2018 -'03MT ?K; T-mKi A T. J2" - f.-4 Lr. • RES firox---- 70F4.0-9 ------ Post. 7e#30.42 APED 76+39.%4N. AM lF DETAIL 5 A• 45'OCI MrLl Y L 4 r. 0 2 0- 80CfiOn Line pr'seggio. ter)$ ED. --- ALPJICKQtL i —l-v30-0r I ISEE DETAM 4 'MAC J— "G,jwJdv,% o.--6.m 4w4 WWWYAE A P� -jd,ajLo.4 . I li Ift'"'t y :"P—o -&D Of LAE 13 5- " ,5Y b ii 4&.4041bw K - . — DEL 'yoj-o&o5al 1, J9P -olf-hr s qv!apaaaNA FF Aft-m-#7 A I "Orr m Rr ra D-7500 4j"k5d colo or LAE , P6-�L. z0a-1.47 j3400.49 M6 ' ClydQfibY" -P.O. 5L A PROSI I.ArERAL 120,S 0-00 a-w-ap,r A 41 FOR P44 UP P IT A YJA 7 L-4 4'.4r.26 'Sro'l L. A I go")4a Af &P MgLArV"oI 9q6q. • IMP . At ACMIA �i-MVIL O+A5*O -P. 0, RE 5. ftaw DEL 4 * MlAar '12 em.OSQQ4. S ? fF VEL Im -0- L r "R. 05 L5:'$"54 *Oru, -wL MM A. 0. . SEE tPE7rA (L cl MO OF LA F. -I-- - . . — — --- 5F. L-4 R,0W (16OX4449 5 L v m 61's 7 p�c" fp-de , , , I t r. ro Sj FOR dI!TAIL.5 %L , I bec. =Wu -Awveo�,, POW• EvAP 7a.lTase" j A F. % ,um, PLANT ;aw o'c&ao Ljar DEA- If? , a " C .SOW041-OLWVlS4rM" DETAIL I L E ."d ---'SE VE hL P -4--44' XVNF�- rvr LORE "r, VEE 4 V &L tl-fld PO w IL !!3,6&05 A I.- I OL CABLE ----' 00n! DEL OFOO'2 . ; , WWPF. i i. 2 A 07�"Y'3 L P. P'T!0MA.— On--lia-P-0 -*-R'QaLT. FOY 5 L f j — j4lllj,-11,� --P&-Sc -0�3$00 A NOTE R. Fk.6 E A R 33F43.60 A141 A17,M14 43" -Sn -4i ENO OP LAE •Cap Of LA r, GO 5110 11 SCALE OF FEET I - m - DO I AS SLIlL Y 795, D ERA M-5 — bends— to COO. --. _ and 10CUtWn vanes f,OM .5r to I table is snow 4.1, trm i Of pips. am,rED srATES 4,e,,.,r rKEArr OF THE INTEMPR BUREAU OF RECLAAW101 90UL'"'R CANYON PROJECT ALL'-AMERICAN CANAL SYSTEM-CALIFORNIA COACHELLA VALLEY DISrOWBUTION SY45TCM uivir jvv. e LATERAL 120.8 FIELD SURVEY ALINEMENT CAN ------ ....... wk, 212-0-7995 515 516 Letter 3 Coachella Valley Water District, September 8, 2016 Comment 3-1 Please address CVWD's 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan (as it relates to projects within or affecting La Quinta). Please visit www.cvwd.org to review the 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan provided within CVWD's Operating Budget. Response 3-1 CVWD's 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan has been included as a reference guide in Section 5.8 Hydrology and Water Quality, page 5.8-24, in the third paragraph under Impacts to Water Supply Resources. Revised text is included here showing new text in double underline and deleted text stricken t"r „^" New development within the La Quinta Planning Area including the Village Build - out Plan project area will result in an increase in the demand for water of approximately 6,555 acre-feet within City Limits and 15,416 acre-feet within the Sphere of Influence by 2035. This new demand will be met by groundwater, imported Colorado River water, desalinated agricultural drain water, or a combination thereof. As described above, CVWD has accounted for this increased water demand in conjunction with all other projected water demands within the service area. CVWD has determined that through adoption of their 5- Year Capital Improvement Plan (see Section 5-15 Utilities) and through utilization of a combination of water supply sources including the need to provide expanded availability of tertiary treated water, and coordination by the City in implementing CVWD UWMP regulations, sufficient water supplies will therefore be available to meet demands in 2035 and also maintain consistency with Policy UTL-1.1 and Program UTL-1.1a. Full detail of the 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan was included in Section 5-15, Utilities, pages 5.15-15 to 5.15-16, under CVWD 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan. Revised text for this section is included here showing new text in double underline and deleted text stricken three.-". CVWD 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan The Village Build -out Plan is located within an area of the City that would be eligible for the funding of infrastructural improvements under CVWD's 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan. Adopted for fiscal years 2016 thru 2020. the 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) provides funding directed towards water resource -related capital improvements. Funding is supplied through revenue sources that include unrestricted reserves, restricted developer fees, grants, reimbursements from other agencies the formation of an assessment district La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Final EIR F.2-13 November 2016 517 Letter 3 Coachella Valley Water District, September 8, 2016 and bonds. The 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan directs funding towards a variety of projects which may or may not be applicable in the Village Buildout Plan area, and are discussed in further detail below. Domestic Water Proiects The 5-Year CIP funds Domestic Water Projects that lead to the completion of construction of CVWD's chromium-6 treatment facilities, reservoir rehabilitation and construction, booster station upgrades. water main improvements and in well drilling. Canal Water Projects The 5-Year CIP funds Canal Water Projects directed toward the Oasis Area Irrigation System Expansion Project (Oasis), which will be partially funded by the formation of an assessment district, and bond issuance. Funding for the Oasis Project will also include monies from the Canal Water Fund and the East Whitewater Re lenishment Fund. Other notable projects include the Coachella Canal lining and replacement projects, numerous irrigation lateral replacements, and drain replacement projects at Durbrow and Harrison and Airport Roads. Sanitation Proiects The 5-Year CIP funds Sanitation Projects directed toward treatment upgrades for Wastewater Reclamation Plant (WRP) 10, treatment upgrades for WRP 7 and treatment process upgrades to WRP 4. In addition, funding is reserved for collection system and lift station upgrades. Projects will be funded with unrestricted reserves. Sanitation Capacity Charge fees (restricted reserves). and r Stormwater Projects The 5-Year CIP funds Stormwater Projects consjs�f the Thousand Palms Flood Control Project. the North Cathedral City Stormwater Project and the North Indio Stormwater Project. In addition, there are several other areas which require construction funding in the future for which master plans are being developed. Projects will be funded using unrestricted reserves and debt financing. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Final EIR F.2-14 November 2016 518 Letter 3 Coachella Valley Water District, September 8, 2016 Non -Potable Water Projects The 5-Year CIP funds Non -Potable Water Projects that currently involve the Mid - Valley Pipeline Master Plan, which be funded using unrestricted reserves and debt financing. Replenishment Projects The 5-Year CIP funds Replenishment Projects directed toward the Oasis Area Irrigation System Expansion Project, pipeline connections and facility improvements. Motorpool The 5-Year CIP funds Motorpool Projects directed toward vehicle and other rolling stock replacements. Comment 3-2 The Draft EIR should note that CVWD is embarking on a multi -year construction program to construct new infrastructure and facilities for the treatment of Chromium-6 at a number of existing and future domestic water wells within the Coachella Valley including the City of La Quinta. Response 3-2 The following paragraph describing CVWD's program for the treatment of Chromium-6 has been included in Section 5-8, Hydrology and Water Quality, page 5.8-23 to 5.8-24, Ground Water Quality and in Section 5-15, Utilities, Page 5.15-16, Ground Water Quality. Revised text is included here showing new text in double underline and deleted text stricken thrG ,.h Ground Water Quality Groundwater from wells throughout the Coachella Valley is carefully monitored by CVWD for hazardous pollutants, most notably Chromium-6. CVWD is currently embarked upon a multi -year program involving the construction of new infrastructure and facilities for the treatment of Chromium-6, which will be installed onsite at a number of existing and future domestic water wells within the Coachella Valley including wells that will serve the City of La Quinta and the Build -out Plan. The Build -out Plan's contribution of Development Impact Fees will assist in providing CVWD with the necessary funding to upgrade new infrastructure and will thereby maintain groundwater quality. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Final EIR F.2-15 November 2016 519 Letter 3 Coachella Valley Water District, September 8, 2016 Comment 3-3 Within the project area, CVWD owns and operates two (2) Irrigation Laterals: 120.8 and 120.8-2.0. A copy of the plan and survey drawing sheets 2117 and 2237 are enclosed for reference, as well as, an aerial map of the Lateral 120.8 System. The potential exists for a non -potable water connection to the La Quinta City Park. CVWD recommends contacting Ty Mull, Engineer, at (760) 398-2661 to discuss this opportunity. Response 3-3 The Village Build -out Plan involves the adoption of revised development standards for the Build -out Area. Any new project development proposed to occur after adoption of the Village Build -out Plan (including development potential surrounding La Quinta City Park) would be analyzed by the City in close cooperation with CVWD to address the potential for a project development to utilize and/or hook into non -potable water lines if available. Comment 3-4 The flood protection measures for local drainage [described in Section 5.8 of the Draft EIR] are required to comply with California Drainage Law and provide that Stormwater flows are received onto, and discharged from, the project area[s] in a manner that is reasonably compatible with pre -development conditions. Response 3-4 The following language has been included at the bottom of the threshold discussion in Section 5-8 Hydrology and Water Quality, page 5.8-19, a. Violate any water quality standards or wastewater discharge requirements, and also included for the last sentence in Mitigation Measure HWQ-2, found in Section 5.8.6, page 5.8-31, Mitigation Measures, to describe how each project specific WQMP will be required to comply with California Drainage Law in accordance with the CRWQB for the assurance of receiving and discharging stormwater flow. Revised text is included here showing new text in double underline and deleted text stFi keR thre4g-k. During long term operation, each project will be required to maintain the site under a post construction Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to be prepared by a QSD that addresses all potential runoff and ongoing maintenance of BMPs related to project retention basins, catch basin inserts, flood channels, flood walls, levees, berms, drop structures and underground culverts. Each Droiect specific WQMP will be reauired to comply with California Drainage Law in accordance with the CRWQCB to assure that the discharge of stormwater La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Final EIR F.2-16 November 2016 520 Letter 3 Coachella Valley Water District, September 8, 2016 flow from future projects is handled in a manner that is reasonably compatible with pre -development conditions. HWQ-2 Prior to the issuance of building permits on vacant parcels within the Village Build -out Plan project area, a WQMP for post construction conditions shall list appropriate best management practices (BMPs) for the control and treatment of runoff from the project site. The WQMP must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer or his/her designee and shall demonstrate compliance with California Drainage Law in accordance with CRWQB to assure that discharge of stormwater flow from future projects is handled in a manner that is reasonably compatible with pre -development conditions. Comment 3-5 The development lies within the study area of CVWD's 2010 Coachella Valley Water Management Plan Update. The goal of this Water Management Plan is to assure groundwater basin sustainability. Each new development incrementally impacts the region's water supplies and the groundwater basin. The elements of the Water Management Plan include supplemental imported water, source substitution and water conservation. The Water Management Plan lists specific actions for reducing overdraft. The elements and actions described in the Plan shall be incorporated into the design of this development to reduce its negative impact on the Coachella Valley groundwater basin. Response 3-5 Revised and updated language has been included in the first and second paragraphs of Section 5-8, Hydrology and Water Quality, page 5.8-23, Water Demand Consistency, and in the first and second paragraphs of Section 5-15, Utilities and Service Systems, page 5.15-14, Water Demand Consistency. This was included (per Comment 3-5) in order to describe the UWMP's purpose, its required preparation every five years, and how each future project within the Build -out Plan will be required to incorporate the elements of the UWMP. Revised text is included here showing new text in double underline and deleted text +ricke . througli. CVWD's 2010 UWMP aceauRts accounted for new growth and development that is expected to occur within the La Quinta City limits, including the Village Build -out Plan project area. The goal of the UWMP is to assure groundwater basin sustainability with elements directed towards supplemental imported water, source substitution and water conservation. As such, these elements are La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Final EIR F.2-17 November 2016 521 Letter 3 Coachella Valley Water District, September 8, 2016 required to be incorporated into the design and development of each future project within the Build -out Plan. As an urban water supplier. CVWD is required to prepare an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) every five years in response to the requirements of the Urban Water Management Planning Act (UWMP Act). California Water Code Sections 10610 through 10656. Therefore, in 2015, CVWD commenced reparation of its revised UWMP, which was adopted in July of 2016. (Nete: CVWI) will its revised 2015 UWMP, which was adepted iin June Aef 24IC4. Section 3.3 of the General Plan WSS describes described that the water demand projections for the La Quinta General Plan Update afe were relative to the water demand projections set forth in the CVWD UWMP. In addition and for clarity, the following language has been added to the second to the last paragraph found in Section 5-15, Utilities and Service Systems, page 5.15-14, Water Demand Consistency, in order to describe the Build -out Plan's water demands being captured and accounted for in the 2010 and 2015 CVWD UWMP projections: As such, water demands generated by the General Plan Planning Area, including the Village Build -out project area, are fully captured and accounted for within the 2010 and 2015 CVWD UWMP projections. Comment 3-6 This Project [La Quinta Village Build -out Plan] is subject to the City's landscape Ordinance which was adopted in accordance with the State's Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and CVWD's Ordinance 1302.1 as amended. The purpose of these ordinances is to establish effective water efficient landscaping requirements for newly installed and rehabilitated landscapes. Response 3-6 Revised and updated language has been included at the bottom of the last paragraph of Section 5-8, Hydrology and Water Quality, page 5.8-23 Water Demand Consistency, and also in the last paragraph of Section 5-15, Utilities and Service Systems, page 5.15-14, under Water Demand Consistency. This was included (per Comment 3-6) in order to describe future development landscaping to be compliance with the City's adopted Landscape Ordinance in accordance with the State's Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Final EIR F.2-18 November 2016 522 Letter 3 Coachella Valley Water District, September 8, 2016 CVWD's Ordinance 1302.1. Revised text is included here showing new text in double underline and deleted text strie eR thraugk Of note is that future residential uses in the Village Build -out area will be multi- family projects developed in an urban setting where traditional yards would not occur. Landscaping represents a large percentage of water usage in traditional residential subdivisions that would not occur in the 1,230 new residential units proposed in the project area. Nonetheless any new landscaping proposed for development within the Build -out Plan will be required to comply with the City's landscape Ordinance which was adopted in accordance with the State's Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and CVWD's Ordinance 1302.1 as amended. Therefore, water demand projections as proposed under the 2035 General Plan are consistent with the water demand estimates utilized by CVWD. Comment 3-7 CVWD has requested a number of text revisions to the Draft EIR to clarify the discussion of sewer collection and treatment facilities that would serve future development in the project area. Response 3-7 The following revisions are made in Section 5-15, Utilities and Service Systems, Section 5.15.2 Existing Conditions, page 5-15.2, under Wastewater Collection and Treatment. Revised text is included here showing new text in double underline and deleted text StFiel(en thFGUg" Wastewater Collection and Treatment Sanitary sewer collection and treatment facilities are provided by the Coachella Valley Water District within most of the City. There are two CVWD wastewater treatment plants that serve La Quinta. Water Reclamation Plant 7 (WRP-7) is located at Madison Street and Avenue 38, northeast of the City in Indio. It provides wastewater treatment for development in the City of La Quinta north of Miles Avenue. The capacity of WRP-7 is 5 million gallons per day (mgd), and the plant processes approximately 2.8 to 3.0 ,.igd it has the capacity to expapA ro7.5 Mgd. Currently there is sufficient excess capacity; therefore, although expansion capacity exists, no such plans are proposed at this time. The Mid -Valley Water Reclamation Plant (WRP-4), located in Thermal (11.8 miles southeast of the Village), serves the area in the City of La Quinta located south of Miles Avenue including the Village Build -out Plan project area. The WRP-4 has a current capacity of 9.9 just under mgd, and processes La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Final EIR F.2-19 November 2016 523 Letter 3 Coachella Valley Water District, September 8, 2016 approximately 4§ mgd per day. Given the excess reapacity, these a eurreRtkyx Re plans fee ^ paRSieR at the Mid Valley plant WRP-4 does not include tertiary treatment facilities. CVWD indicates that such facilities could be located at this plant in the future should demand warrant. CVWD sewer lines utilize a system of trunk lines ranging in diameter from 8 to 42 4 is U inches. There-are1-9 iRGh diam^+^r fer,.^ ImIaiRS OR Wash;n^+^n Street de##erJ9R Street, Madisen Street, and�^,veRues 50, 58-and-650: Existing sewer line infrastructure are currently in place in the project area. CVWD may need additional facilities to provide for the orderly expansion of its sanitation systems. These facilities may include additional gravity pipelines or lift stations) expansion and facilities. Individual proposals within the Build -out Plan area will be reviewed to assure that these additional facilities, if required, are incorporated into construction plans. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Final EIR F.2-20 November 2016 524 AQUA CALIENTE BALD OF CAHUILLA INDIAN5 TF[E E3AL HISTORIC i;RFSEiaYATFi?ry Letter 4 03-003-2015-002 September 22, 2016 [VIA EMAIL TO:ncriste@la-quinta.org] City of La Quinta Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: Village Build -Out EIR Dear Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste, The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) appreciates your efforts to include the Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) in the Village Building -Out Plan, 2015-003 project. We have reviewed the documents and have the following comments: *At this time ACBCI has no comments, but please continue to provide our office with updates as the project progresses. Also, please inform our office if there are 4-1 changes to the scope of this project. *Before ground disturbing activities begin please contact the Tribal Historic Preservation Office to arrange cultural monitoring. The phone number for 4-2 monitoring services is 760-699-6981. Again, the Agua Caliente appreciates your interest in our cultural heritage. If you have questions or require additional information, please call me at (760)699-6829. You may also email me at acbci-thpo@aguacaliente.net. Cordially, � cl* Katie Croft Archaeologist Tribal Historic Preservation Office AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS 5401 DINAH SHORE DERIVE. PALM SPRINGS. CA 92264 T 7601693:6.800 Ir Ti3W690?6E324 WWVW.AC�U CALJENTE-NSN,GOV 525 Letter 4 Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, September 22, 2016 Comment 4-1 At this time ACBCI has no comments, but please continue to provide our office with updates as the project progresses. Also, please inform our office if there are changes to the scope of this project. Response 4-1 Comment received and acknowledged. City staff will inform Agua Caliente if any changes arise. Comment 4-2 Before ground disturbing activities begin please contact the Tribal Historic Preservation Office to arrange cultural monitoring. The phone number for monitoring services is 760-699-6981. Response 4-2 Comment received and acknowledged. Mitigation Measure CR-5 addresses this requirement for any future development within the Build -out Plan that proposes ground disturbing activities, requiring that the project proponent contact a Native American Monitor prior to ground disturbing activities. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Final EIR F.2-22 November 2016 526 11D P_OMRJ A caihiry of service. September 22, 2016 Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta Planning Department 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quint@, CA 92253 Letter 5 SUBJECT: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Draft EIR Dear Ms. Sauviat Criste: wwwAid.com Since 1911 Pursuant to the City of La Quinta Planning Department's Notice of Availability of a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan where the City is proposing to develop a buiJd- out plan for the Village, its traditional downtown, that would allow for a mix of uses (residential, professional and commercial) on 137 acres of land generally located north and south of Calle Tampico, east of Eisenhower Drive and west of Washington Street; the Imperial Irrigation District has reviewed the DER and has the following comments: Based on the information provided, IID has performed a preliminary assessment of the project and found the impacts to the district's electrical existing infrastructure to be significant, increasing the electrical demand of the IID's system. Although IID has performed an initial impact assessment of the project, the district will not begin any engineering or estimate costs to provide power for the project until the owner applies for electrical service and the project's detailed loading information is provided. 2. Once the applicant provides the district with the project's detailed loading and panel size information, IID can carry out a more thorough assessment to determine the specific requirements to supply permanent power to the project, including but not limited to new distribution circuits and system upgrades with new line extensions and reconfigurations to existing IID facilities. Depending on the project's build -out plans and projected electrical loading information, a new substation site with new 92 kV transmission line extensions could potentially be required. 3. For the substation site lID would require a parcel of 315' by 315' at minimum, to be acquired at the sole expense of the developers in the area. This requirement includes such items as grading, fencing, applicable permits, zoning changes, environmental documentation, landscaping (if required by the City) and access rights for ingress and egress, as well as power line facilities and rights -of -way and easements for the substation and transmission line extension routes, all of which are at the expense of the developers in the area. The potential substation site and transmission routes/right-of-way and easements should be addressed in the project environmental compliance documentation. 4. The applicant should be advised to contact IID Energy - La Quinta Division Customer Operations, 81-600 Avenue 58 La Quinta, CA 92253, at (760) 398-5841 for more 5-1 5-2 5-3 5-4 527 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION D15TRJCT . P.O. BOX 937 • IMPERIAL, CA 9225 ] Nicole 5auviat Criste September 22, 2016 Page 2 information regarding electrical service for the project. Additional assistance can also be provided b Mr. Carlos Partida c artida IID.com IID Project Manager, at 760-398-5820. 5-4 con't P Y � p � ), j 9 5. The applicant will be required to provide rights -of -way and easements for any power line 5-5 extensions needed to serve the project. 6. Line extensions to serve the project will be made in accordance with IID Regulations: No. 2 (http:ll vww.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=2540), 5-6 No. 13 (hftp://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=2553) and No. 15 (http://www.iid.com/home/showdocumgnl2id=2555J. 7. Any construction or operation on IID property or within its existing and proposed right of way or easements including but not limited to: surface improvements such as proposed new streets, driveways, parking lots, landscape; and all water, sewer, storm water, or any other above ground or underground utilities; will require an encroachment permit, or encroachment 5-7 agreement {depending on the circumstances}. A copy of the IID encroachment permit application and instructions for its completion can be found at the following IID website: htt ://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=3306. The IID Real Estate Section should be contacted at (760) 339-9239 for additional information regarding encroachment permits or agreements. 8. Any new, relocated, modified or reconstructed IID facilities required for and by the project (which can include but is not limited to electrical utility substations, electrical transmission and distribution lines, etc.) need to be included as part of the projecfs CEQA and/or NEPA 5-8 documentation, environmental impact analysis and mitigation. Failure to do so will result in postponement of any construction and/or modification of IID facilities until such time as the environmental documentation is amended and environmental impacts are fully mitigated. Any and all mitigation necessary as a result of the construction, relocation and/or upgrade of IID facilities is the responsibility of the project proponent. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 760-482-3609 or at dvargas@iid.com. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this matter. Respe Ily, Don d Vargas Environmental Regulatory Compliance Administrator Kevin Kelley - General Manager Mike Pacheco - Manager, Water Dept, Vicken Kasariian - Manager, Energy Dept Jamie Asbury - Deputy Energy Manager, critical Business & Regulatory Affairs Vance Taylor -Asst, General Counsel Robert Laurie - Asst. General Counsel Jesse Montano - Transmission, Planning and Engineering Oversight Samuel E. Singh - Supt. Customer Project Development, Energy Dept. Michael P. Kemp - Superintendent, Real Estate & Environmental Compliance Harold Walk Jr. - Supervisor, Real Estate Randy Gray - ROW Agent, Real Estate 528 Letter 5 Imperial Irrigation District, September 22, 2016 Comment 5-1 Based on the information provided, IID has performed a preliminary assessment of the project and found the impacts to the district's electrical existing infrastructure to be significant, increasing the electrical demand of the IID's system. Although IID has performed an initial impact assessment of the project, the district will not begin any engineering or estimate costs to provide power for the project until the owner applies for electrical service and the project's detailed loading information is provided. Response 5-1 As described on page 1-1 of the Draft EIR Executive Summary and again on page 3-1 of the Draft EIR Project Description, the City of La Quinta has undertaken a planning process to develop a build -out plan for the Village, its traditional downtown, that would allow the development of a mix of land uses within the approximately 137-acre project area. The intent of the planning project evaluated in the Draft EIR is to provide a roadmap for the physical development of the properties within the project area, including upgrades to infrastructure as necessary as development occurs in the future. There are currently no proposed development projects in the project area. The Draft EIR Section 5.15, Utilities and Services Systems, provides a discussion of the probable future electrical needs within the project area and acknowledges that the increase in electrical needs associated with build -out of the project area will likely create a need for additional electrical power supply sources, and infrastructure. The City identified mitigation (Mitigation Measure UTL-3) in order to track development projects in the Village and coordinate with IID to ensure timely upgrade to electrical infrastructure. It is the City's intent to continue to work in concert with IID and other service providers to ensure the orderly development of the Village including the adequate supply and distribution of electrical service throughout the project area, as applicants bring development projects to the City. Comment 5-2 Once the applicant provides the district with the project's detailed loading and panel size information, IID can carry out a more thorough assessment to determine the specific requirements to supply permanent power to the project, including but not limited to new distribution circuits and system upgrades with new line extensions and reconfigurations to existing IID facilities. Depending on the project's build -out plans and projected electrical loading information, a new substation site with new 92 kV transmission line extensions could potentially be required. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Final EIR F.2-25 November 2016 529 Letter 5 Imperial Irrigation District, September 22, 2016 Response 5-2 Comment noted. On a project -by -project basis, as new development projects are proposed, III) will be consulted by project applicants in order to ensure IID's ability to serve the project, and to determine what system upgrades may be required. Please also see comment 5-1. Comment 5-3 For the substation site IID would require a parcel of 315' by 315' at minimum, to be acquired at the sole expense of the developers in the area. This requirement includes such items as grading, fencing, applicable permits, zoning changes, environmental documentation, landscaping (if required by the City) and access rights for ingress and egress, as well as power line facilities and rights -of -way and easements for the substation and transmission line extension routes, all of which are at the expense of the developers in the area. The potential substation site and transmission routes/right-of-way and easements should be addressed in the project environmental compliance documentation. Response 5-3 Regarding the need for a new substation to serve the project area, it is likely that there will be no project large enough to trigger the need for a substation by itself. Therefore, City staff suggest that IID and the City enter into a discussion at an early date, to determine the optimal location for a substation based on the land use plan described in the Draft EIR, and begin proceedings for setting such a site aside for future use for a substation. Once this is done, IID may collect development impact fees from each project applicant to be set aside for the purchase and development of the substation, and associated transmission line extensions. Comment 5-4 The applicant should be advised to contact IID Energy - La Quinta Division Customer Operations, 81-600 Avenue 58 La Quinta, CA 92253, at (760) 398-5841 for more information regarding electrical service for the project. Additional assistance can also be provided by Mr. Carlos Partida (cpartida@IID.com), IID Project Manager, at 760-398-5820. Response 5-4 Comment noted. At such time as applications for development projects are received by the City, said applicants will be directed to contact IID for information regarding the provision of electrical service. Comment 5-5 The applicant will be required to provide rights -of -way and easements for any power line extensions needed to serve the project. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Final EIR F.2-26 November 2016 530 Letter 5 Imperial Irrigation District, September 22, 2016 Response 5-5 Comment noted. At such time as applications for development projects are received by the City, IID will determine, on a project -by -project basis if rights -of - way and easements for any power line extensions would be required. Comment 5-6 Line extensions to serve the project will be made in accordance with IID Regulations: No. 2 (http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=2540 ), No. 13 (http://www.ii d.com/home/showdocument?i d=2553), and No. 15 (http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=2555). Response 5-6 Comment noted. Comment 5-7 Any construction or operation on IID property or within its existing and proposed right of way or easements including but not limited to: surface improvements such as proposed new streets, driveways, parking lots, landscape; and all water, sewer, storm water, or any other above ground or underground utilities; will require an encroachment permit, or encroachment agreement (depending on the circumstances). A copy of the IID encroachment permit application and instructions for its completion can be found at the following IID website: http://www iid.com/home/showdocument?id=3306. The 110 Real Estate Section should be contacted at (760) 339-9239 for additional information regarding encroachment permits or agreements. Response 5-7 Comment noted. At such time as applications for development projects are received by the City, IID will determine, on a project -by -project basis if any project related elements such as driveways, sidewalks, parking lots or any wet infrastructure must be constructed within IID property. If a project element is proposed within IID property, an applicant will be required to apply for an Encroachment Permit from IID. Comment 5-8 Any new, relocated, modified or reconstructed IID facilities required for and by the project (which can include but is not limited to electrical utility substations, electrical transmission and distribution lines, etc.) need to be included as part of the project's CEQA and/or NEPA documentation, environmental impact analysis and mitigation. Failure to do so will result in postponement of any construction and/or modification of IID facilities until such time as the environmental documentation is amended and environmental impacts are fully mitigated. Any and all mitigation necessary as a result of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Final EIR F.2-27 November 2016 531 Letter 5 Imperial Irrigation District, September 22, 2016 construction, relocation and/or upgrade of IID facilities is the responsibility of the project proponent. Response 5-8 As discussed in Response to Comment 5-1, the project that is the subject of the Draft EIR is a planning document, the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan, that is intended to guide future development in the City's traditional downtown area. At this time there are no development projects proposed. Therefore, it is unknown what IID facilities, if any, may require relocation, modification, or reconstruction as a result of a future development project, or if new IID facilities may be required. The City of La Quinta considers IID to be a partner in the successful future development of the Village, and looks forward to working with IID staff to ensure the orderly progression of infrastructure improvements to meet the needs of future business owners and residents. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Final EIR F.2-28 November 2016 532 F.3 REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT EIR F.3 REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT EIR F.3.1 Revisions in Response to Comments Received Revisions have been made to the text of the Draft EIR in response to comments received during the public review period from the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). These revisions are based on CVWD's request to either update the document to include a discussion of CVWD's 5- Year Capital Improvement Plan as it relates to future projects in the Village Build -out Plan project area; or to revise the discussion of the sanitary sewer collection and treatment facilities with more recent data on waste water treatment capacity. Additional text added to the Draft EIR in Table 1-3, Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures, Section 5.8, Hydrology and Water Quality, and Section 5.15, Utilities and Service Systems, constitute minor revisions to clarify and/or update the discussion. Mitigation Measure HWQ-2 in Section 5.8 was revised to clarify that future storm flows must be similar to existing conditions. This measure was also revised in Table 1-3 as follows: HWQ-2 Prior to the issuance of building permits on vacant parcels within the Village Build -out Plan project area, a WQMP for post construction conditions shall list appropriate best management practices (BMPs) for the control and treatment of runoff from the project site. The WQMP must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer or his/her designee and shall demonstrate compliance with California Drainage Law in accordance with CRWQB to assure that the receiving onto and discharge of stormwater flow is handled in a manner that is reasonably compatible with pre - development conditions. In accordance with Section 15088.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, minor revisions to the Draft EIR do not constitute significant new information that would require recirculation of the Draft EIR. Recirculation is only required when the new information added shows a new, substantial environmental impact resulting from the project or from a mitigation measure; shows a substantial increase in the severity of an impact where the incorporation of new mitigation will not reduce the impact to less than significant; where the information shows a new feasible alternative or mitigation measure that would clearly lessen the impact, but a project proponent refuses to incorporate it; or where the EIR is so fundamentally inadequate that public review of the prior document is effectively meaningless. See Laurel Heights Improvement Assn v Regents of Univ. of Cal. (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1112, 1130. None of the revisions requested by CVWD meet those standards as required in order to support the recirculation of the Draft EIR. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Final EIR F.3-1 November 2016 533 F.3 REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT EIR Revised text is found in three sections of the Draft EIR, Table 1-3, Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures, Section 5.8, Hydrology and Water Quality, and Section 5.15, Utilities and Service Systems. Individual pages where revisions have been made are reprinted in this Chapter and have been inserted in the relevant sections of the Revised Draft EIR that is a part of this Final EIR. All revisions to the Draft EIR are done with new text being underlined, and d-elet„d- text _+F*r-_k,,A thr9 , 4 La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Final EIR F.3-2 November 2016 534 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Signature and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Date of Compliance Aesthetics AES-1 During the building permit application, evidence must be submitted to Project Prior to approval of prove that the proposed work will comply with the City Outdoor Lighting Applicant/Developer for final development Ordinance of the Municipal Code. each site; Design and plans Development Director or his/her designee Air Quality AQ-1 All development projects in the project area must adhere to SCAQMD Project Prior to any land Rules (see Section 5.2, Air Quality pp. 5.2-6 through 5.2-9 for details of Applicant/Developer, disturbance and during the applicable rules), for the control of fugitive dust, for the Construction Contractor construction maintenance of construction vehicles and equipment, and for the use of reduced VOC asphalt, architectural coatings and solvents. Rules are listed here in abbreviated form. SCAQMD Rule 402 prohibits a person from discharging from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause injury or damage to business or property. SCAQMD Rule 403 governs emissions of fugitive dust during construction and operation activities. SCAQMD Rule 403.1 is supplemental to Rule 403 requirements and applies only to fugitive dust sources in the Coachella Valley, where applicants must prepare and implement Fugitive Dust Control Plans during construction. SCAQMD Rule 445 prohibits permanently installed wood burning devices in any new development. SCAQMD Rule 481 applies to all spray painting and spray coating La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-1 November 2016 535 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Signature and Date of Compliance operations and equipment. The rule states that a person shall not use or operate any spray painting or spray coating equipment without implementing specific requirements. SCAQMD Rule 1108 governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of asphalt and limits the volatile organic compound (VOC) content in asphalt used in the South Coast Air Basin. This rule regulates the VOC content of asphalt used during construction. Therefore, all asphalt used during construction of the project must comply with SCAQMD Rule 1108. SCAQMD Rule 1113 governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of architectural coatings and limits the VOC content in paints and paint solvents. This rule regulates the VOC content of paints available during construction. Therefore, all paints and solvents used during construction and operation of the project must comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113. SCAQMD Rule 1143 governs the manufacture, sale, and use of paint thinners and solvents used in thinning of coating materials, cleaning of coating application equipment, and other solvent cleaning operations by limiting their VOC content. This rule regulates the VOC content of solvents used during construction. Solvents used during the construction phase must comply with this rule. SCAQMD Rule 1186 limits the presence of fugitive dust on paved and unpaved roads and sets certification protocols and requirements for street sweepers that are under contract to provide sweeping services to any federal, state, county, agency or special district such as water, air, sanitation, transit, or school district. SCAQMD Rule 1303 governs the permitting of re -located or new major emission sources, requiring Best Available Control Measures and setting significance limits for PM10 among other pollutants. SCAQMD Rule 1401, New Source Review of Toxic Air Contaminants, specifies limits for maximum individual cancer risk, cancer burden, and La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-2 November 2016 536 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Signature and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Date of Compliance non -cancer acute and chronic hazard index from new units, relocations, or modifications to existing units, which emit toxic air contaminants. SCAQMD Rule 2202, On -Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options, is to provide employers with a menu of options to reduce mobile source emissions generated from employee commutes, to comply with federal and state Clean Air Act requirements, Health & Safety Code Section 40458, and Section 182(d)(1)(B) of the federal Clean Air Act. It applies to any employer who employs 250 or more employees on a full or part- time basis at a worksite for a consecutive six-month period. AQ-2 Project applicants shall require that ENERGY STAR -compliant appliances Project Prior to approval of are installed where appliances are required on -site. Applicant/Developer; final building plans Building Official or his/her designee AQ-3 Project applicants shall include high -efficiency lighting that is at least 10 Project During Construction percent more efficient than standard lighting. Applicant/Developer Construction Contractor; Building Official or his/her designee AQ-4 The City shall ensure compliance with SCAQMD Rule 1186 (limits fugitive Project During Construction dust on paved and unpaved roads and sets certification protocols and Applicant/Developer, requirements for street sweepers) and 2202 (provides employers of 250 Construction Contractor; or more employees with a menu of options to reduce mobile source Building Official or his/her emissions generated by employee commutes), during long term designee operations in the Village. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-3 November 2016 537 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Signature and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Date of Compliance AQ-5 Project applicants shall provide sidewalks within each project boundary Project During Construction and along off -site roadway improvements. Applicant/Developer, Construction Contractor; Building Official or his/her designee AQ-6 All project applicants shall ensure that new and/or remodeled buildings Project Prior to approval of meet or exceed California Building Code Energy Efficiency Standards. Applicant/Developer; final building plans Building Official or his/her designee AQ-7 All project applicants shall require that all faucets, toilets and showers Project During review of installed in proposed structures utilize low -flow fixtures that would Applicant/Developer, building plans/site plan reduce indoor water demand by 20 percent per CalGreen Standards or Construction Contractor; review more stringent standards if in place at the time development occurs. Building Official or his/her designee AQ-8 Project applicants shall implement recycling programs that reduce waste Project During Construction; to landfills by a minimum of 75 percent or more stringent standards if in Applicant/Developer, and on -going during place at the time development occurs. Construction Contractor; operation Sustainable La Quinta Program Coordinator AQ-9 To the extent feasible, project applicants shall use paints and coatings Project During Construction with a VOC content lower than SCAQMD Rule 1113 requires or more Applicant/Developer, stringent standards if in place at the time development occurs, for Construction Contractor application to surfaces of residential dwelling units and commercial units within project boundaries. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-4 November 2016 538 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Signature and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Date of Compliance Biological Resources BIO-1 Burrowing Owl. Prior to any land disturbance on currently vacant Project 14 days prior to properties, an applicant shall have a biological survey conducted at the Applicant/Developer, grading and land project site to determine presence/absence of the species. Results of Construction Contractor, disturbance activities the survey may determine whether focused surveys must be conducted. Project Biologist; Design If the site survey determines the presence of burrowing owl, mitigation and Development Director in accordance with the CDFW shall be implemented as follows: or his/her designee • If burrowing owls are identified as being resident on -site outside the breeding season (February 1 through August 31) they may be relocated to other sites by a permitted biologist (permitted by CDFW), as allowed in the CDFW Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (March 2012). • If an active burrow is found during the breeding season, the burrow shall be treated as a nest site and temporary fencing shall be installed at a distance from the active burrow, to be determined by the biologist, to prevent disturbance during grading or construction. Installation and removal of the fencing shall be done with a biological monitor present. BIO-2 Nesting Bird Surveys. Removal of any appropriate vegetation located on Project 30 days prior to a project site shall be conducted outside of the avian nesting season Applicant/Developer, construction activities (February through August). If construction must occur during the avian Project Biologist, nesting season, a pre -construction nesting bird survey shall be Construction Contractor; conducted within seven days prior to any ground disturbing activities. If Design and Development at any time birds are found to be nesting, construction activities within Director or his/her 250 feet of the nest must not occur until it is determined by a qualified designee biologist that the nest is no longer active. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-5 November 2016 539 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Signature and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Date of Compliance BIO-3 CVMSHCP Mitigation Fee. New development projects are required to pay the mitigation fees; even those projects located in urban areas. The most current rates (2016) are as follows (but future developments may be subject to updated fees): Dwelling Units Fee 0-8 units $1,301 per unit 8-14 units $541 per unit 14 + units $239 per unit Non -Residential Commercial/industrial $5,809 per acre Project Prior to grading and Applicant/Developer, land disturbance Construction Contractor, activities Project Biologist; Design and Development Director or his/her designee Cultural Resources CR-1 Demolition or extensive alteration of the building at 78035-78039 Calle Project Prior to grading and Estado should be avoided. Overriding considerations to justify the loss of Applicant/Developer, land disturbance the building would need to be developed were demolition pursued. Licensed Cultural activities Because the building is significant for its architectural merits and as one Resources Specialist of La Quinta's original downtown commercial buildings, mitigation measures such as photographic and written documentation must be developed prior to any demolition or extensive alteration of this building. Documentation of the building shall follow the Historic American Building Survey (HABS) Level I Standards. This documentation shall include production of high -quality archival print photographs and plan drawings of the building, including but not limited to a floor plan, elevation drawings, and any character -defining features or details on the building. All work carried out pursuant to the documentation of the building shall be conducted by, or under the direct supervision of a person or persons meeting, at a minimum, the Secretary of the Interior's La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-6 November 2016 540 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Signature and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Date of Compliance Professional Qualifications Standards (48 FR 44738-39 as revised in 1994) as an architectural historian. A written report detailing the documentation shall be provided to the City of La Quinta upon completion of the work. The report shall be produced on archival materials and filed with the La Quinta Historical Society and Museum and La Quinta Library. CR-2 If redevelopment of 78035-78039 Calle Estado occurs, the design of any Project Prior to grading and new construction adjacent to this one-story Spanish Colonial Revival- Applicant/Developer, land disturbance style commercial building must be compatible in design, scale, massing, Licensed Cultural activities and appearance as stated in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Resources Specialist Guidelines. The design of new construction should not replicate the historic building style resulting in a false sense of history, but it shall not contrast starkly from its architectural style or design. New construction adjacent to this historic resource shall be no more than two stories high, and shall not overpower or overshadow this building (massing/scale). The final design of the new construction should be developed in consultation with a historic architect or architectural historian who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (as published in 36 CFR Part 61). CR-3 The design of any new construction adjacent to the one- and two-story Project During review of Spanish Colonial and Monterey Revival -style historic resources at 78023 Applicant/Developer, building plans/site plan Calle Estado, 77895 Avenida Montezuma, 77885 Avenida Montezuma, Licensed Cultural review and 51001 Eisenhower Drive, shall be compatible in design, scale, Resources Specialist massing, and appearance as required by the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. The building design should not attempt to replicate these buildings in appearance, but shall not conflict or contrast with their architectural style. New construction adjacent to these historic resources shall be no more than two stories high, and shall not overpower or overshadow these existing buildings (scale/massing). La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-7 November 2016 541 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Signature and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Date of Compliance The final design of the new construction shall be developed in consultation with a historic architect or architectural historian who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (as published in 36 CFR Part 61). CR-4 The design of any new construction within the Village Build -Out Plan Project Prior to grading and Area adjacent to the residences of the La Quinta Cove Thematic Historic Applicant/Developer, land disturbance District shall be compatible in design, scale, massing, and appearance Licensed Cultural activities with existing historical commercial buildings in the Village Commercial Resources Specialist zone. The design of new commercial buildings should be compatible with the Spanish Colonial and Monterey Revival architectural style of the existing historical commercial core. New construction adjacent to the La Quinta Cove Thematic Historic District shall be no more than two stories high, and shall not overpower or overshadow the historical residential buildings of the La Quinta Cove as required by the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. The final design of the new construction should be developed in consultation with a historic architect or architectural historian who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (as published in 36 CFR Part 61). CR-5 Because the project site is considered to be highly sensitive for Project During ground containing prehistoric archaeological deposits in subsurface contexts, a Applicant/Developer, disturbing activities qualified archaeological monitor (and Native American monitor) shall be Project Archaeologist, associated with grading present during all phases of construction grading and trenching activities Native American Monitor and/or construction for any project developed on vacant land that has not been previously surveyed for cultural resources, as illustrated in Exhibit 5.4-1 and any development/ redevelopment project that proposes underground parking. The amount of monitoring shall be determined by the archaeologist through the preparation of a monitoring plan to be prepared prior to commencement of grading. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-8 November 2016 542 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Signature and Date of Compliance CR-6 A qualified paleontologist shall be retained prior to the start of Project During Construction construction for projects proposed on vacant lots or Applicant/Developer, and ground disturbing development/redevelopment projects proposing underground parking. Project Paleontologist activities After final depths of impacts are known (from grading plans), a paleontological mitigation plan shall be prepared limited to the proposed deep impact areas (greater than 3 feet) of the project only. In particular, the plan shall (1) clearly define that test trenches that would be dug to the maximum depth of proposed impacts, (2) permit the use of heavy equipment to perform the trenching as all samples will be taken from sidewalls after a stratigraphic profile is developed, (3) require recording of each strata revealed, (4) require radiocarbon dates for each strata, (5) require samples of about 10 kilogram (kg) for each strata with collection of additional samples up to 100 kg for layers rich in vertebrate fossils, (6) require identification and analysis by recognized experts, (7) require an interpretive report, (8) require curation of significant specimens recovered and (9) encourage publication of results. The plan would identify the amount of monitoring required. CR-7 In the event that human remains are uncovered, no further disturbance Construction Contractor, At time of occurrence shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made a determination Riverside County Coroner of origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98. The Riverside County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the human remains are determined to be prehistoric, the coroner will notify the NAHC, which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD shall complete the inspection of the site within 48 hours of notification and may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-9 November 2016 543 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Signature and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Date of Compliance Geology and Soils GEO-1 Applicants for new structures shall utilize modern building materials and Project Site Plan/Architectural techniques, and be built in accordance with the latest version of the Applicant/Developer, Plan Review/Building California Building Code. Project Engineer Plan Review GEO-2 Applicants for new development projects, including redevelopment Project Geotechnical Report involving changes to building size shall be required to prepare a detailed Applicant/Developer, submittal with geotechnical and soils analysis that includes soil sampling, laboratory Project Engineer; Design application for testing and mitigation measures intended to reduce potential and Development Director development geotechnical hazards to less than significant levels. or his/her designee Greenhouse Gases GHG-1 Project applicants shall provide sidewalks within the project boundary Project Site Plan/Architectural and along the off -site roadway improvements where these are lacking. Applicant/Developer, Plan Review/Building Project Engineer; Design Plan Review and Development Director or his/her designee GHG-2 Project applicants shall ensure that all building structures meet or Project Site Plan/Architectural exceed 2013 Title 24, Part 6 Standards and meet Green Building Code Applicant/Developer; Plan Review/Building Standards, or more stringent standards if in place at the time building Building Official or his/her Plan Review permits are issued. designee GHG-3 Project applicants shall ensure that all faucets, toilets and showers Project Prior to approval of installed in the proposed structures utilize low -flow fixtures that would Applicant/Developer; final building plans reduce indoor water demand by 20 percent per CalGreen Standards to Building Official or his/her the satisfaction of the Building Department. designee La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-10 November 2016 544 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Signature and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Date of Compliance GHG-4 Project applicants shall ensure that ENERGY STAR -compliant appliances Project Prior to approval of are installed where appliances are required on -site. Applicant/Developer; final building plans Building Official or his/her designee GHG-5 Project applicants shall implement recycling programs that reduce waste Project During Construction; to landfills by a minimum of 75 percent. Applicant/Developer, and on -going during Construction Contractor; operation Sustainable La Quinta Program Coordinator GHG-6 Project applicants shall install high -efficiency lighting be installed that is Project Prior to approval of at least 10 percent more efficient than standard lighting. Applicant/Developer; final building plans Building Official or his/her designee GHG-7 To the extent feasible, project applicants shall use paints and coatings Project During construction with a VOC content lower than SCAQMD Rule 1113 requires for Applicant/Developer; application to surfaces of residential dwelling units and commercial units Building Official or his/her within project boundaries. designee Hazards and Hazardous Materials HAZ-1 All new development projects that propose the use, transport or storage Project Submit plans with Site of hazardous materials in their plan of operations and are defined as a Applicant/Developer of Plan/Architectural Plan new generator of hazardous materials shall comply with all local, state, applicable Planning Areas application package and federal regulations, as required by law. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-11 November 2016 545 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Signature and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Date of Compliance HAZ-2 In compliance with Chapter 6.95 of the California Health & Safety Code Design and Development Prior to issuance of (HSC) and Title 19, Division 2, of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Director or his/her occupancy permits for all new development that proposes the storage and use of hazardous designee each business materials at or above reporting criteria thresholds shall prepare a Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan (HMBEP). The HMBEP shall be reviewed and approved by the County of Riverside CUPA and the Department of Environmental Health prior to the initiation of operation of the business. HAZ-3 All new development projects that propose the use and storage of Design and Development Prior to issuance of hazardous materials will be required to prepare a Spill Prevention Director or his/her occupancy permits for Counter measurement Contingency Plan (SPCC) that addresses designee each business appropriate protocol measures to contain accidental spills of hazardous materials. A SPCC spill kit shall also be placed onsite at the business or facility. HAZ-4 All new development and redevelopment projects within the Village Design and Development Prior to issuance of Build -out Plan project area shall submit development plans and permits Director or his/her occupancy permits for to the City for review, and City shall coordinate with the Desert Sands designee; DSUSD each business Unified School District regarding any proposed land uses that will produce hazardous waste, such as doctor's offices. HAZ-5 All project development proposals shall submit plans to the Fire Design and Development Prior to issuance of Department for review and conditioning for safe accessibility of fire and Director or his/her occupancy permits for ambulatory services and for appropriate evacuation routing of the designee each business project development in the event of an emergency. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-12 November 2016 546 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Signature and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Date of Compliance Hydrology and Water Quality HWQ-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits on vacant or underutilized Project Prior to grading and parcels that will be developed within the Village Build -out Plan, a Storm Applicant/Developer, land disturbance Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared for all Qualified SWPPP activities projects within the Village Build -out Plan that disturb one acre or more. Developer, Qualified The SWPPP shall list appropriate best management practices (BMPs) for SWPPP practitioner the control and treatment of runoff from the project site. The applicant is responsible for the preparation and implementation of the SWPPP per the NPDES requirements and must file a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resource Control Board and receive a Waste Discharge ID Number (WDID), and have a copy of the SWPPP at the project site at all times during construction. HWQ-2 Prior to the issuance of building permits on vacant parcels within the Project Prior to approval of Village Build -out Plan project area, a WQMP for post construction Applicant/Developer, final development conditions shall list appropriate best management practices (BMPs) for Construction Contractor plans the control and treatment of runoff from the project site. The WQMP must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer or his/her designee and shall demonstrate compliance with California Drainage Law in accordance with CRWQB to assure that discharge of stormwater flow from future projects is handled in a manner that is reasonably compatible with pre -development conditions. HWQ-3 The City of La Quinta is responsible for constructing improvements to City Engineer or his/her Prior to the storm drain evacuation system in the Village Build -out project area. designee commencement of These improvements must be made prior to commencement of development of new development of new projects in the project area, proposed after projects in the project adoption of the Build -out Plan. Subsequently, prior to issuance of area buildings permits for new development on vacant properties or redevelopment of underutilized properties in the project area applicants will pay development impact fees for drainage improvements to the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-13 November 2016 547 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Signature and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Date of Compliance storm drain evacuation system. HWQ-4 Prior to project construction of new projects on vacant lands, or Project Prior to Grading Permit redevelopment projects on currently developed parcels, the project Applicant/Developer, City or Building Permit applicant shall pay a Development Impact Fee specific towards funding Engineer or his/her of storm drain upgrade improvements along Calle Tampico Ave. designee HWQ-5 All project development within the Village Build -out Plan shall City Engineer and CVWD On -going as individual coordinate and cooperate with CVWD to ensure City-wide compliance projects are proposed with current State Senate Bill x7-7 to reduce per capita urban water use by 36 percent for year 2016, and 20 percent reduction by year 2020, including landscaping conversion programs and the smart irrigation control program; expanding the availability of sustainable water supplies such as tertiary treated water, and encouraging its use for landscape irrigation purposes, especially for irrigating golf courses and other large landscaped areas, and/or other mandates imposed at the time development occurs. HWQ-6 The City shall review and amend its Development Standards to require Design and Development Prior to approval of any that all new development within the Village Build -out Plan demonstrate a Director or his/her new development reduction of domestic water consumption equivalent to the CalGreen designee projects Tier One standards in effect at the time of development. HWQ-7 The City shall continue to implement its Water Efficient Landscape Design and Development Site Plan/Architectural ordinance by requiring that development projects within the Village Director or his/her Plan Review Build -out Plan implement water efficient landscaping plans to meet or designee exceed current water efficiency standards. HWQ-8 The City shall require that new development within the Village Build -out Design and Development Site Plan/Architectural Plan reduce its projected water consumption over "business as usual" Director or his/her Plan Review consumption rates. designee La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-14 November 2016 548 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Signature and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Date of Compliance HWQ-9 The City shall develop programs to allow and encourage the retrofitting Design and Development On -going coordination of existing water intensive appliances and irrigation systems for existing Director or his/her with CVWD development within the Village Build -out Plan. designee HWQ-10 The City shall continue to require that all new developments within the Project Site Plan/Architectural Village Build -out Plan use water conserving appliances and fixtures, Applicant/Developer/ Plan Review including low -flush toilets and low -flow showerheads and faucets, as well Design and Development as the application of water -conserving technologies in conformance with Director or his/her Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code, Title 20, California designee Administrative Code Section 1601(b), and applicable sections of Title 24 of the State Code. HWQ-11 The City shall continue to encourage that new development within the Project Site Plan/Architectural Village Build -out Plan use faucets, showerheads and appliances that Applicant/Developer/ Plan Review exceed Title 20 and Title 24 water efficiency requirements. Design and Development Director or his/her designee Land Use and Planning LU-1 The City of La Quinta is committed to the success of the Village becoming Design and Development Project a more livable place by creating a more accessible place for residents and Director or his/her Applicant/Developer/C visitors to live and visit while downplaying the need for motor vehicles. designee/Project ommunity To that end, and for each new individual project, the City shall implement Applicant/Developer Development Director a required quantification analysis, methodology in the 2006 City of La or his/her designee Quinta Village District Parking Study, parking management strategies, parking supply strategies, and zoning/administration strategies beginning with those identified in Table 5.9-4. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-15 November 2016 549 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Signature and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Date of Compliance Noise NOI-1 Based on a project's proximity to sensitive receptors, City Staff will Design and Development Site Plan/Architectural determine if a Noise Impact Analysis is needed on a project -by -project Director or his/her Plan Review basis during their review of project applications. If required, the study designee/Project shall analyze noise levels within the proposed project, and include Applicant/Developer mitigation measures to assure that the modeled interior and exterior noise levels meet the City's standards. NOI-2 Truck deliveries to businesses in the project area that are adjacent to Design and Development On -going during sensitive land uses shall be limited to daylight hours. Director or his/her operation designee/individual business owners La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-16 November 2016 550 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Population and Housing No Mitigation Measures Required. Public Services PS-1 The City and Riverside County Fire Department shall continue to confer Design and Development Site Plan/Architectural and coordinate to ensure that facilities and services within the Village Director or his/her Plan Review Build -out Plan are expanded in a timely manner. designee/Fire Department PS-2 The Riverside County Fire Department shall continue to review and Design and Development Site Plan/Architectural evaluate new development proposals and project plans within the Village Director or his/her Plan Review Build -out Plan to make certain that it can provide adequate fire designee/Fire Department protection. PS-3 All new development projects within the Village Build -out Plan shall be Design and Development Site Plan/Architectural subject to Police Department review to assure that the Department can Director or his/her Plan Review provide adequate police protection. designee/Fire Department/Police Department PS-4 The City shall monitor City population and Police Department staffing Design and Development Site Plan/Architectural levels to ensure the provision of police protection services at consistent Director or his/her Plan Review levels. designee/Fire Department/Police Department PS-5 Development projects within the Village Build -out Plan shall be assessed Design and Development Site Plan/Architectural statutory school mitigation fees, in place at the time residential and Director or his/her Plan Review commercial projects are proposed. designee/DSUSD PS-6 Development projects within the Village Build -out Plan shall be assessed Design and Development Site Plan/Architectural development impact fees, in place at the time residential and Director or his/her Plan Review commercial projects are proposed. designee Recreation No Mitigation Measures Required. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-17 November 2016 551 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Signature and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Date of Compliance Transportation and Traffic CIR-1 Washington Street/Avenida La Fonda (#13): Construct a raised "worm" To be provided by City median to allow northbound left -turns and restrict eastbound left -turns. Staff CIR -2 Jefferson Street/Avenue 52 (#16): Reconstruct the existing roundabout To be provided by City to provide two circulating lanes and two entry lanes at the northbound Staff and southbound approaches. The new two lane roundabout should be constructed with consideration for conversion to a three lane roundabout by General Plan Buildout conditions. CIR -3 Eisenhower Drive/Avenida Montezuma (#3): Convert Eisenhower To be provided by City Drive/Avenida Montezuma from an all -way stop control to a yield- Staff controlled roundabout [this improvement is assumed in the Village Buildout Circulation Plan]. CIR -4 Washington Street/Avenue 48 (#9): Construct the northbound approach To be provided by City to consist of three through lanes and one right -turn lane. Remove the Staff pedestrian crosswalk at the north leg of the intersection. CIR 5 Eisenhower Drive/Calle Tampico (#2): Construct one additional To be provided by City westbound left -turn lane to provide dual left -turn lanes. Staff CIR -6 Avenida Bermudas/Calle Tampico (#5): Construct one additional To be provided by City westbound left -turn lane. The TIA identified an alternative to construct a Staff roundabout rather than adding an additional lane in the event that the improvement identified in the General Plan Circulation Element is infeasible. This will be determined by the Design and Development Director/City Engineer. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-18 November 2016 552 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Signature and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Date of Compliance CIR -7 Desert Club Drive/Calle Tampico (#7): Construct one exclusive To be provided by City northbound right -turn lane and one additional westbound left -turn lane. Staff The TIA identified an alternative to construct a roundabout rather than adding an additional lane in the event that the improvement identified in the General Plan Circulation Element is infeasible. This will be determined by the Design and Development Director/City Engineer. CIR -8 Washington Street/Avenue 48 (#9): Construct one exclusive northbound To be provided by City right -turn lane. Staff CIR -9 Washington Street/Avenue 52 (#14): Construct one additional To be provided by City eastbound left -turn lane to provide triple left -turn lanes. Provide one Staff additional southbound left -turn lane to provide triple left -turn lanes. CIR 10 For road segments along Calle Tampico between Avenida Bermudas and To be provided by City Washington Street, the City shall conduct periodic monitoring of actual Staff conditions in the Village (timing to be determined as development begins to occur in the project area, and will review its Parking Demand Management strategies (directly correlated with traffic volumes) to determine additional strategies that can be employed related to remote parking and shuttle service, additional pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and education programs. Utilities and Service Systems UTL-1 All new development within the Village Build -out Plan shall be connected Construction Contractor Prior to grading and to sanitary sewer service. land disturbance activities. UTL-2 The City shall ensure coordination with CVWD and to assure that existing City Engineer or his/her and future extended sanitary sewer facilities are adequate. designee La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-19 November 2016 553 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Signature and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Date of Compliance UTL-3 The City shall create a tracking log for development projects in the City Engineer or his/her project area that identifies the existing wet and dry infrastructure in the designee project area, then on a project -by -project basis, inputs the type and size of proposed uses, the potable water required, wastewater generated and electrical demand generated. The City will work with CVWD, III) SCG and others to determine when upgrades to infrastructure will be required. UTL-4 All project development within the Village Build -out Plan shall coordinate City Engineer and CVWD and cooperate with CVWD to ensure City-wide compliance with current State Senate Bill x7-7 to reduce per capita urban water use by 36 percent for year 2016, and 20 percent reduction by year 2020, including landscaping conversion programs and the smart irrigation control program; expanding the availability of sustainable water supplies such as tertiary treated water, and encouraging its use for landscape irrigation purposes, especially for irrigating golf courses and other large landscaped areas. UTL-5 The City shall review and amend its Development Standards if necessary Project to require that all new development within the Village Build -out Plan Applicant/Developer, demonstrate a reduction of domestic water consumption equivalent to Construction Contractor; the CalGreen Tier One standards in effect at the time of development. Building Official or his/her designee UTL-6 The City shall continue to implement its Water Efficient Landscape Design and Development ordinance by requiring that development projects within the Village Director or his/her Build -out Plan implement water efficient landscaping plans to meet or designee exceed water efficiency standards. UTL-7 The City shall require that new development within the Village Build -out Design and Development Plan to reduce its projected water consumption over "business as usual" Director or his/her consumption rates. designee La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-20 November 2016 554 FA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Signature and Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Timing of Compliance Date of Compliance UTL-8 In conjunction with CVWD as well as independently, the City shall Design and Development develop programs to allow and encourage the retrofitting of existing Director or his/her water intensive appliances and irrigation systems for existing designee development within the Village Build -out Plan. UTL-9 All new developments shall use water conserving appliances and fixtures, Project as well as the application of water -conserving technologies in Applicant/Developer/ conformance with Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code, Title Design and Development 20, California Administrative Code Section 1601(b), and applicable Director sections of Title 24 of the State Code. UTL-10 All new and existing commercial establishments shall be required to Design and Development On -going during comply with State mandates (AB 341) to reduce the amount of packaging Director or his/her operation and potential waste associated with product manufacturing and sales. designee; Sustainable La Quinta Program Manager UTL-11 Prior to the issuance of building permits within the Village Build -out Plan, Design and Development Prior to issuance of the City shall continue to refer project developers to Burrtec for Director or his/her building permits development of construction and demolition solid waste recycling plans designee; Sustainable La in order to divert a minimum of 50% of C&D debris from the waste Quinta Program Manager stream. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR F.4-21 November 2016 555 556 The Village Build -out Plan Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report State Clearing House No. 2015101019 City of La Quinta, California Lead Agency: City of La Quinta Planning Division 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Prepared by: The Altum Group 73-710 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 G The Altum Group Revised November 2016 557 558 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Executive Summary..............................................................................................1-1 1.1 Overview of the Executive Summary...........................................................................1-1 1.2 Summary of the Proposed Action................................................................................1-1 1.3 Alternatives to the Proposed Project..........................................................................1-3 1.4 Areas of Contreversy/Issues to be Resolved...............................................................1-6 1.5 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures (Revised)...........................................1-6 Chapter2 Introduction........................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Overview of and Authority for the EIR.........................................................................2-1 2.2 Review of the EIR.........................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Scope of the EIR...........................................................................................................2-2 2.4 Organization of the EIR................................................................................................2-4 2.5 Reference Documents..................................................................................................2-6 Chapter 3 Project Description..............................................................................................3-1 3.1 Overview......................................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Project Location and Setting........................................................................................3-2 3.3 Project Description.....................................................................................................3-25 3.4 Other Public Agencies................................................................................................3-40 3.5 Cumulative Projects to be Evaluated with the Proposed Project..............................3-41 Chapter 4 Environmental Setting.........................................................................................4-1 4.1 Aesthetics.....................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Agricultural Resources.................................................................................................4-2 4.3 Air Quality....................................................................................................................4-2 4.4 Biological Resources.....................................................................................................4-4 4.5 Cultural Resources.......................................................................................................4-5 4.6 Geology........................................................................................................................4-7 4.7 Global Climate Change/Greenhouse Gases.................................................................4-9 4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials.............................................................................4-10 4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality....................................................................................4-10 4.10 Land Use and Planning...............................................................................................4-13 4.11 Noise..........................................................................................................................4-13 4.12 Population and Housing.............................................................................................4-14 4.13 Public Services and Utilities.......................................................................................4-15 4.14 Recreation..................................................................................................................4-19 4.15 Transportation/Traffic...............................................................................................4-20 Chapter 5 Environmental Impact Analysis............................................................................5-1 5.0 Introduction.................................................................................................................5-1 5.1 Aesthetics..................................................................................................................5.1-1 5.2 Air Quality.................................................................................................................5.2-1 5.3 Biological Resources..................................................................................................5.3-1 559 Table of Contents 5.4 Cultural Resources....................................................................................................5.4-1 5.5 Geology and Soils......................................................................................................5.5-1 5.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions.......................................................................................5.6-1 5.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials............................................................................5.7-1 5.8 Hydrology and Water Quality (Revised)...................................................................5.8-1 5.9 Land Use and Planning..............................................................................................5.9-1 5.10 Noise.......................................................................................................................5.10-1 5.11 Population and Housing..........................................................................................5.11-1 5.12 Public Services.........................................................................................................5.12-1 5.13 Recreation...............................................................................................................5.13-1 5.14 Traffic and Circulation.............................................................................................5.14-1 5.15 Utilities and Service Systems (Revised)..................................................................5.15-1 Chapter 6 Other CEQA Required Sections.............................................................................6-1 6.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................6-1 6.2 Significant Environmental Effects Which Cannot be Avoided.....................................6-1 6.3 Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes..........................................................6-6 6.4 Growth Inducing Impacts...........................................................................................6-10 6.5 Effects Found not to be Significant............................................................................6-10 Chapter 7 Alternatives to the Proposed Project....................................................................7-1 7.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................7-1 7.2 Project Description and Objectives..............................................................................7-3 7.3 Impacts of the Proposed Project.................................................................................7-4 7.4 Alternatives to the Proposed Project..........................................................................7-5 7.5 Alternative Impact Evaluation...................................................................................7-31 7.6 Environmentally Superior Alternative.......................................................................7-31 List of Tables Table 1-1 Existing and Potential New Development in the Village Build -out Plan ProjectArea...........................................................................................................1-2 Table 1-2 Comparison of Village Build -out Plan and Alternatives........................................1-5 Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (Revised)................................................................................................................1-7 Table 3-1 Existing Conditions in the Project Area.................................................................3-3 Table 3-2 Existing and Potential New Development in the Project Area..............................3-3 Table 3-3 Build -out Assumptions by Area...........................................................................3-27 Table 3-4 Implementation Process for Parking Management Strategies ...........................3-39 Table 3-5 Build -out Assumptions by Area...........................................................................3-41 560 Table of Contents Table 3-6 Permitting Agencies.............................................................................................3-41 Table 3-7 List of Cumulative Projects..................................................................................3-45 Table 5.2-1 State and Federal Criteria Pollutant Standards..................................................5.2-3 Table 5.2-2 Salton Sea Air Basin Attainment Status ................................ .............................. 5.2-4 Table 5.2-3 Air Quality Monitoring Summary .....................................................................5.2-15 Table 5.2-4 SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds for Coachella Valley .................5.2-17 Table 5.2-5 Regional Construction -Related Pollutant Emissions........................................5.2-24 Table 5.2-6 Unmitigated Regional operational Pollutant Emissions..................................5.2-26 Table 5.2-7 Mitigated Regional Operational Pollutant Emissions.......................................5.2-27 Table 5.2-8 Maximum Number of Acres Distributed Per Day.............................................5.2-28 Table 5.2-9 Local Construction Emissions at the Nearest Receptors..................................5.2-29 Table 5.3-1 Special Status Species.........................................................................................5.3-7 Table 5.4-1 Previously Identified Resources.........................................................................5.4-3 Table 5.4-2 Potential for Direct and Indirect Effects...........................................................5.4-10 Table 5.6-1 Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes....................................5.6-4 Table 5.6-2 Unmitigated Project -Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions...............................5.6-15 Table 5.6-3 Year 2035 Mitigated Project -Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...................5.6-17 Table 5.6-4 Year 2005 Baseline Project -Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions .....................5.6-18 Table 5.8-1 Estimate of Existing Water Service Demands..................................................5.8-19 Table 5.8-2 Estimate of Water Service Demands at Build Out...........................................5.8-20 Table 5.8-3 Estimate of Water Service Demands from New Development ........................5.8-21 Table 5.9-1 Existing Conditions in the Project Area..............................................................5.9-2 Table 5.9-2 Existing and Potential New Development in the Project Area .........................5.9-11 Table 5.9-3 Village Construction Since 2006.......................................................................5.9-14 Table 5.9-4 Implementation Process for Parking Management Strategies ........................5.9-28 Table 5.10-1 Exterior Noise Limits.........................................................................................5.10-3 Table 5.10-2 Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments..........................5.10-4 Table 5.10-3 Existing Ambient Hourly and 24-Hour Noise Level Measurements In andNear the Village.........................................................................................5.10-7 Table 5.10-4 Existing Noise Exposure Adjacent to the Village..............................................5.10-8 Table 5.10-5 Build Out Noise Levelsl....................................................................................5.10-9 Table 5.10-6 Year 2035 Build -out Conditions Noise Contours............................................5.10-11 Table 5.11-1 Total Households, 2000 to 2010.......................................................................5.11-1 Table 5.11-2 Total Dwelling Units by Type of Structure, 2000-2010....................................5.11-2 Table 5.11-3 Household Tenure and Vacancy, 2010.............................................................5.11-2 Table 5.11-4 Regional Housing Needs Assessment, 2014-2021...........................................5.11-3 Table 5.12-1 Desert Sands Unified School District Enrollment and Capacity .......................5.12-3 Table 5.12-2 School Facilities for Projected Students from New Development ...................5.12-7 561 Table of Contents Table 5.14-1 Study Intersections...........................................................................................5.14-2 Table 5.14-2 Study Roadway Segments................................................................................5.14-2 Table 5.14-3 Level of Service Intersection Control Delay.....................................................5.14-7 Table 5.14-4 Existing Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis................................................5.14-13 Table 5.14-5 Existing Intersection Delay and Level of Service............................................5.14-14 Table 5.14-6 Project Trip Generation..................................................................................5.14-29 Table 5.14-7 Net Project Trip Generation for General Plan Build -out Analysis ..................5.14-31 Table 5.14-8 Existing Plus Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis............................5.14-58 Table 5.14-9 Existing Plus Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service ........................5.14-59 Table 5.14-10 Interim Year Without Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis .............5.14-60 Table 5.14-11 Interim Year Without Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service .......... 5.14-61 Table 5.14-12 Interim Year With Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis ...................5.14-62 Table 5.14-13 Interim Year With Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service ...............5.14-63 Table 5.14-14 General Plan Build -out Without Project Roadway Segment CapacityAnalysis............................................................................................5.14-64 Table 5.14-15 General Plan Build -out Without Project Intersection Delay and Level ofService........................................................................................................5.14-65 Table 5.14-16 General Plan Build -out With Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis...........................................................................................................5.14-66 Table 5.14-17 General Plan Build -out With Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service.............................................................................. ..5.14-69 Table 5.14-18 General Plan Build -out With Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis (Village Build -out Circulation Plan)...................................................5.14-79 Table 5.14-19 General Plan Build -out With Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service (Village Build -out Circulation Plan)....................................................5.14-80 Table 5.15-1 Estimate of Existing Water Service Demands................................................5.15-11 Table 5.15-2 Estimate of Water Service Demands at Build Out..........................................5.15-12 Table 5.15-3 Estimate of Water Service Demands from New Development ......................5.15-12 Table 5.15-4 Solid Waste Generation at Build Out.............................................................5.15-19 Table 5.15-5 Estimated Electricity Usage Rates..................................................................5.15-20 Table 6-1 Unmitigated Regional operational Pollutant Emissions.......................................6-2 Table 6-2 Mitigated Regional Operational Pollutant Emissions............................................6-2 Table 6-3 Year 2035 Mitigated Project -Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................6-4 List of Exhibits Exhibit3-1 Regional Vicinity....................................................................................................3-5 Exhibit 3-2 City of La Quinta Corporate Boundary..................................................................3-7 562 Table of Contents Exhibit 3-3 Project Site and Vicinity.........................................................................................3-9 Exhibit3-4 Site Photos...........................................................................................................3-11 Exhibit 3-5 General Plan Land Use Designations...................................................................3-17 Exhibit 3-6 Zoning Designations............................................................................................3-23 Exhibit 3-7 Village Build -out Plan Analysis.............................................................................3-29 Exhibit 3-8 Village Build -out Circulation Plan........................................................................3-35 Exhibit 3-9 Multi Modal Street Improvements......................................................................3-37 Exhibit 3-10 Cumulative Project Locations..............................................................................3-43 Exhibit 5.3-1 Critical Habitat and Modeled Habitat................................................................5.3-5 Exhibit 5.4-1 Cultural Resources Survey Map............._..........................................................5.4-13 Exhibit 5.4-2 Paleontological Sensitivity Map.......................................................................5.4-17 Exhibit 5.5-1 Geologic Map......................................................................................................5.5-5 Exhibit 5.5-2 Fault Locations..................................................................................................5.5-15 Exhibit 5.5-3 Seismic Hazards................................................................................................5.5-19 Exhibit 5.5-4 Wind Susceptibility Map...................................................................................5.5-23 Exhibit 5.8-1 FEMA Flood Zones and Flood Control Facilities.................................................5.8-5 Exhibit 5.8-2 FEMA Flood Zones..............................................................................................5.8-7 Exhibit 5.8-3 10-Year Retention Study Map..........................................................................5.8-11 Exhibit 5.8-4 10 Year On -Site Discharge Study Map..............................................................5.8-27 Exhibit 5.9-1 Zoning Designations ....... .................................................................................... 5.9-3 Exhibit 5.9-2 Village Construction Since 2006 Parking Study................................................5.9-19 Exhibit 5.9-3 Village Parking Study Photos - West.................................................................5.9-21 Exhibit 5.9-4 Village Parking Study Photos - Northeast.........................................................5.9-23 Exhibit 5.9-5 Village Parking Study — Photos - Southeast......................................................5.9-25 Exhibit 5.10-1 Noise Measurement Locations.........................................................................5.10-5 Exhibit 5.14-1 Project Intersections and Roadway Locations.................................................5.14-5 Exhibit 5.14-2 City of La Quinta Roadway Classifications........................................................5,14-9 Exhibit 5.14-3 General Plan Roadway Cross-Sections...........................................................5.14-11 Exhibit 5.14-4 Project Vicinity Golf Cart/NEV Paths Master Plan..........................................5.14-17 Exhibit 5.14-5 Project Vicinity Bike Paths Master Plan..........................................................5.14-19 Exhibit 5.14-6 Existing Pedestrian Facilities...........................................................................5,14-21 Exhibit 5.14-7 Existing SunLine Bus Routes.................._........................................................5.14-23 Exhibit 5.14-8 Interim Year Without Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes ........................5.14-33 Exhibit 5.14-9 Interim Year Without Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection TurningVolumes.............................................................................................5.14-35 Exhibit 5.14-10 Interim Year Without Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection TurningVolumes.............................................................................................5,14-37 Exhibit 5.14-11 Interim Year With Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes.............................5.14-39 563 Table of Contents Exhibit 5.14-12 Interim Year With Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes..........................................................................5.14-41 Exhibit 5.14-13 Interim Year With Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes.......................................................................................5.14-43 Exhibit 5.14-14 General Plan Build -out Without Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes...........................................................................................••............. 5.14-45 Exhibit 5.14-15 General Plan Build -out Without Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes.....................................................5.14-47 Exhibit 5.14-16 General Plan Build -out Without Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes.....................................................5.14-49 Exhibit 5.14-17 General Plan Build -out With Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes.............5.14-51 Exhibit 5.14-18 General Plan Build -out With Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes.....................................................5.14-53 Exhibit 5.14-19 General Plan Build -out With Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes.....................................................5.14-55 Exhibit 5.14-20 Village Build -out Circulation Plan...................................................................5.14-73 Exhibit 5.14-21 Example of Multi -Modal Street......................................................................5.14-77 List of Appendices Appendix A Notice of Preparation and Comments Received Appendix B Air Quality/Global Climate Change Analysis Appendix C NRCS Custom Soils Report Appendix D EDR Report Appendix E City of La Quinta Focused Area Drainage Study Appendix F Downtown Area Drainage Study for City of La Quinta Appendix G La Quinta Village Hydrology Study Appendix H Traffic Impact Assessment 564 List of Acronyms ac acre ALUC Airport Land Use Commission AMR American Medical Response AP Alquist Priolo APS alternate planning strategy AQMP Air Quality Management Plan BLM Bureau of Land Management BMP Best Management Practice CAA Clean Air Act CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards CalEPA California Environmental Protection Agency CARB California Air Resources Board CAT Climate Action Team CBC California Building Code CCR California Code of Regulations CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CERT Community Emergency Response Team CFC Chlorofluorocarbon CFR Federal Code of Regulations cfs cubic feet per second CGS California Geological Survey CH4 methane CHP California Highway Patrol CN Neighborhood Commercial CNEL Community Noise Equivalency Level CNPS California Native Plant Society CO carbon monoxide CO2 carbon dioxide CpA Coachella Fine Sand CRHR California Register for Historical Resources CUP Condition Use Permit CUPA Certified Unified Program Agencies CVAG Coachella Valley Association of Governments CVMSHCP Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan CVUSD Coachella Valley Unified School District CVWD Coachella Valley Water District CWA Clean Water Act 565 List of Acronyms dB decibel dBA A -weighted Decibel DEH Department of Environmental Health DOF Department of Finance DPM Diesel Particulate Matter DRMC Desert Regional Medical Center DSUSD Desert Sands Unified School District DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Control du dwelling units EIR Environmental Impact Report EPA Environmental Protection Agency EOP Emergency Operations Plan EPO Environmental Protection and Oversight Division EMC Eisenhower Medical Center FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map ft foot GbA Gilman fine sandy loam GHG Greenhouse Gas GLO United States General Land Office gpcd gallons per capita per day GWP Global Warming Potential HAP Hazardous Air Pollutants HMBEP Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan HMRT Hazardous Materials Response Team HFC Hydroflourocarbon HHW Hazardous Household Waste HRA Health Risk Assessment HSC California Health and Safety Code HWMP Hazardous Waste Management Plan IID Indio Irrigation District Ip Indio fine sandy loam Is Indio very fine sandy loam ISO Insurance Service Office IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change LPG Liquid Propane Gas LOS Level of Service LST Localized Significant Threshold 566 List of Acronyms MaB Myoma fine sand MC Major Community Facilities mgd million gallons per day MLD Most Likely Descendent mph miles per hour MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization MTBA Migratory Bird Treaty Act NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NEV Neighborhood Electric Vehicle NFIP National Flood Insurance Program N2O Nitrous Oxide NOC Notice of Completion NOP Notice of Preparation NOX Nitrogen Oxides NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System NPS National Parks Service NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service 03 Ozone OES Governor's Office of Emergency Services OHMS Office of Hazardous Materials Safety PFC Perflourocarbon PM10 particulate matter equal to or less than 10 microns in diameter PM2.5 particulate matter equal to or less than 2.5 microns in diameter ppb parts per billion ppm parts per million PR Parks and Recreation Qa Alluvial deposits QI Interbedded lacustrine QSD Qualified SWPPP Developer QSP Qualified SWPPP Practitioner RCB reinforced catch basins RCFC Riverside County Flood Control RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 RHNA Regional Housing Needs Assessment ROG Reactive Organic Compound RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Plan RTP Regional Transportation Plan 567 List of Acronyms RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCS Sustainable Community Strategy SF6 Sulfur Hexaflouride SHMA Seismic Hazards Mapping Act SIP State Implementation Plan S02 Sulfur Dioxide SP Service Population SPCC Spill Prevention Counter-measure Contingency Plan SRA Source Receptor Area SSAB Salton Seas Air Basin SWP State Water Project SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board TAC Toxic Air Contaminants TCP Traditional Cultural Resource or Property TDM Transportation Demand Management TIA Traffic Impact Analysis TUMF Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee UBC Uniform Building Code UNFCCC United Nations' Framework Convention on Climate Change USACOE United States Army Corps of Engineers USFS United States Forest Service USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service USGS United State Geological Survey UWMP Urban Water Management Plan VC Village Commercial VOC Volatile Organic Compound WCD Water Conservation District WDID Waste Discharge Identification Number WGCEP Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities WQMP Water Quality Management Plan WSS Water Supply Study yr year 568 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Chapter 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Overview of the Executive Summary This chapter has been prepared pursuant to Section 15123 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, which states that an EIR Summary shall: 1) contain a brief summary of the proposed action; 2) identify each significant effect with proposed mitigation measures that would reduce or avoid that effect; 3) identify alternatives that were designed to reduce or avoid identified significant effects; 4) identify areas of controversy known to the Lead Agency including issues raised by agencies and the public; and 5), identify issues to be resolved including the choice among alternatives and whether or how to mitigate the significant effects. 1.2 Summary of the Proposed Action The City of La Quinta (City) has undertaken a planning process to develop a build -out plan for the Village, its traditional downtown, that would allow for a mix of uses including: 1) vertical mixed use — where retail or professional office space occurs on the ground floor, with residential units above; 2) horizontal mixed use — where retail or professional office uses and higher density residential occur next to each other, and are integrated through pedestrian connections and common areas; or 3) mixed use added to existing commercial development where the residential project abuts or wraps around an existing commercial development. By creating a build -out plan that will foster the continued development of the Village as a pedestrian -oriented, mixed use environment, and evaluating the potential environmental impacts of the Village Build -out Plan in this EIR, the City will be able to offer property owners and developers the opportunity to streamline the planning process for their projects. There is no actual time table for ultimate build out to occur, as development will be driven by market forces and demand for new residential units and additional non-residential uses in the Village. However, 2035 represents the horizon year for the City's General Plan adopted in 2013, therefore it is reasonable to assume a similar time frame for the build -out of the City's Village. In addition, to provide a benchmark for growth in the Build -out Plan project area and continue to plan for future development in the project area, the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) included an analysis of an Interim Year (2021). The intent is to evaluate a build -out scenario that will allow future projects to be approved based on the analysis provided in this EIR along with a menu of mitigation measures and performances standards that must be met in order to ensure that impacts on the physical environment would be less than significant. Table 1-1, Existing and Potential New Development in the Village Build -out Plan Project Area, shows the potential for new residential and non-residential uses in the Village. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-1 August 2016 569 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-1 Existing and Potential New Development in the Village Build -out Plan Project Area Existing Potential Existing New Non - Land Use Acres Residential New Non- Residential Units Residential Residential Square Feet TOTAL (DU)1 Units (DU) Square Feet Vacant Land 20.70 -- 436 -- 288,330 -- Land with the Potential for 30.20 -- 794 12,400 511,456 -- Redevelopment Existing Developed Properties with no Change in Land Use 85.90 284 -- 139,525 -- -- or Increased Density 284 DU 1,482 DU, 290 +290 hotel hotel/ casita Total 136.74 1,230 DU 151,925 799,786 rooms & 960,711 casitas square feet Source: City of La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Land Use Data, August 2015. Notes: 1. Residential unit count includes existing residences 1.2.1 Objectives of the Proposed Project The City's goal is to continue to develop the Village as a livable and sustainable neighborhood - reminiscent of older cities - where land uses are more interconnected, compact, and offer a mix of uses, providing opportunities for people to live, work, and shop within the neighborhood. In order to achieve this goal, a number of objectives have been identified based on the concept of mixed - use. The City's objectives in proposing the Village Build -out Plan are as follows: • Continue the development of the Village as a mixed use neighborhood by encouraging additional residential and commercial development. • Amend the Zoning Code Text for the Village Commercial District, in the area south of Calle Tampico to allow an increase in building height (subject to site plan review on a project by project basis) to allow an increase in density of residential uses. • Ensure that public facilities and infrastructure are adequate to support the increase in intensity of land uses in the Village. • Capitalize on unique development opportunities in the Village area by focusing on shopping, dining, entertainment, professional and mixed use options while improvingthe aesthetics of the community. • Enforce existing development standards that: 1) create attractive, useable and safe public spaces; and 2) promote safe indoor and outdoor spaces and provide emergency services that are adequately funded, staffed, and equipped to provide timely responses. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-2 August 2016 570 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.2.2 Discretionary Actions / Other Approvals Associated with the Proposed Project Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15367, the City of La Quinta is the Lead Agency and has discretionary authority over the project. This EIR will be used by the City as part of its consideration of future development proposals in the Village. Other responsible or trustee agencies may also use the EIR in their consideration of permitting of projects in the Village. For example, a vehicle fueling station requires permits from the County Department of Environmental Health and the South Coast Air Quality Management District in order to construct and operate such a facility. 1.3 Alternatives to the Proposed Project This EIR has developed, considered and evaluated alternatives to the proposed project pursuant to the provisions of Section 15126.6 of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended. Section 15126.6(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines states that: "An EIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. An EIR needs to not consider every conceivable alternative to a project. Rather it must consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that will foster informed decision making and public participation .... There is no ironclad rule governing the nature or scope of the alternatives to be discussed other than the rule of reason." State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15126.6 (b) through (f) identifies the key considerations pertaining to, and requirements for, the preparation of the alternatives analysis in an EIR. 1.3.1 Alternatives Considered and Rejected from Further Analysis 1.3.1.1 No Project — No Development Alternative CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e) specifically addresses the requirement to discuss a No Project alternative with the option to evaluate one of two scenarios: 1) when a project is a revision to an existing land use or regulatory plan, policy or ongoing operation the no -project alternative would be the continuation of the existing plan, policy or operation into the future; or 2) if the project is other than a land use or regulatory plan, such as a development project, the no -project alternative is the circumstance under which the project does not proceed. In certain circumstances, the no project alternative is a no build scenario where the existing environmental setting is maintained. Scenario 1 is evaluated in Section 7.4.3 — Alternative 1 — No Project - Buildout Under the Existing Zoning Ordinance and La Quinta Village Design Guidelines. Scenario 2, the No Project/No Development Alternative was rejected because the Village is an existing Commercial District that is currently developed with a number of residential, commercial, La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-3 August 2016 571 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY professional office, and public facilities uses, but still has a number of vacant and underutilized properties that could be developed. Therefore, an analysis of where the existing environmental setting is maintained, is not a logical alternative to the proposed Village Build -out Plan. 1.3.1.2 Increased Density Alternative In studying the optimum build -out scenario for the Village, the City of La Quinta considered varying densities of residential and non-residential uses. One such alternative was to develop the project area with an additional 799,786 square feet of non-residential uses and up to 40 dwelling units to the acre where the proposed Build -out Plan calls for a maximum of 25 to 30 dwelling units to the acre. This alternative was considered and rejected because it would require an increase in the height of buildings greater than the 45 to 60 feet proposed in the Build -out Plan to reach the density of 40 dwelling units to the acre, which would be incompatible with the character of the Village. 1.3.2 Alternatives Considered for Evaluation Two alternatives to the proposed Village Build -out Plan were considered for evaluation compared to the proposed project. The following provides a summary of the Alternatives Analysis provided in Chapter 7 of the EIR. 1.3.2.1 Alternative 1: Build -out Under the Existing Zoning Ordinance and La Quinta Village Design Guidelines Under this alternative development in the Village Build -out Plan project area is the No -Project Alternative where the proposed Zoning Code amendments would not be adopted to allow for increased height and residential density that would create a more compact pedestrian friendly neighborhood, with residential, commercial and professional office space. In addition, under this alternative, projects would continue to be subject to the Village Design Guidelines which include a maximum building height of 45 feet. Table 7-3, Comparison Between Development Under Existing Zoning Code/Village Design Guidelines and the Village Build -out Plan, shows the difference between the proposed project and this alternative. 1.3.2.2 Alternative 2: Reduced Village Build -out Plan Project Area Under this alternative, development in the Village Build -out Plan project area would only occur on vacant properties. Properties that the City has identified as having the potential to be redeveloped under the Village Build -out Plan would remain developed with existing uses. Under this alternative, the intensity and density of new uses on vacant properties would be similar to those allowed under the Village Build -out Plan. • Building Height — 60 feet • Dwelling units at up to 30 units to the acre • No Village Design Guidelines — architectural style considered on a project by project basis La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-4 August 2016 572 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.3.2.3 Alternative Evaluation Table 1-2, Comparison of Village Build -out Plan and Alternatives, shows the development data for the proposed project and the two alternatives. Alternative 1 represents a 35 percent reduction in dwelling units and non-residential square footage, while Alternative 2 represents a 65 percent reduction from the proposed project. Table 1-2 Comparison of Village Build -out Plan and Alternatives Project Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Dwelling units Existing 284 284 284 Proposed 1,198 785 434 Total 1,482 1,069 718 Non-residential uses Existing 160,925 160/925 160,925 Proposed 799,786 590,935 297,330 Total 960,925 7511860 458,255 Source: For the proposed project - City of La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Land Use Data, August 2015. For alternatives, simple reduction of 35 and 65 percent respectively. The Environmental Analysis of the proposed Village Build -out Plan concluded that there would be a significant and unavoidable impact on Air Quality associated with the generation of emissions of the following criteria pollutants—VOC, NOX and CO, and Global Climate Change associated with emissions of Greenhouse Gasses. All other impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels through the implementation of mitigation measures identified in Table 1-3, Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures. Under Alternative 1, Build -out Under the Existing Zoning Ordinance and La Quinta Village Design Guidelines, although air emissions and emissions of GHG would be reduced, they would remain above the thresholds for the same criteria pollutants and CO2. Like the proposed project, all other impacts would be less than significant. Under Alternative 2, Reduced Village Build -out Plan Project Area, a 65 percent reduction in dwelling units and non-residential uses would result in a project that would not have an impact on the environment as only the vacant properties would be developed in the area; approximately 20 acres. However, this alternative would not meet the City's goal of developing a livable and sustainable neighborhood that requires a population density substantially higher than what would be generated by this alternative. 1.3.2.4 Environmentally Superior Alternative The environmentally superior alternative is Alternative 2, Reduced Village Build -out Plan Project Area, where only vacant properties would be developed, representing a 65 percent reduction in the number of dwelling units and square footage of non-residential uses. Alternative 2 would meet the City's goal La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-5 August 2016 573 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY to continue to develop the Village as a livable and sustainable neighborhood - reminiscent of older cities - where land uses are more interconnected, compact, and offer a mix of uses, providing opportunities for people to live, work, and shop within the neighborhood. However, not to the extent that the Village Build -out Plan would because of the economy of scale required to upgrade the public facilities and infrastructure in the Village, including the proposed traffic calming elements such as replacing traditional four way stops with round-abouts, adding additional pedestrian amenities such as wider sidewalks and enhanced crosswalks (i.e. pedestrian activated crosswalk lights), upgrading the drainage system and upgrading the water and sewer lines to accommodate new growth. 1.4 Areas of Controversy/Issues to be Resolved CEQA Guidelines Section 15123(b) states that an EIR shall contain a brief summary of the projects actions and its consequences including: (2) areas of controversy known to the Lead Agency including issues raised by other agencies and the public; and (3) Issues to be resolved including the choice among alternatives and whether or how to mitigate the significant impacts. Areas of Controversy No Areas of Controversy were identified in the comments received on the Notice of Preparation. (See Section 2.3, Scope of the EIR). Issues to be Resolved The choice among alternatives is summarized in section 1.5, Summary of Alternatives. A summary of potentially significant impacts and proposed mitigation measures are identified in Table 1-2, Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures. 1.5 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures Table 1-3, Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures, identifies the potentially significant effects of the proposed project, mitigation measures, project features and/or requirements identified to avoid or reduce the identified potentially significant effects to less than significant levels, and the effectiveness of the mitigation measures, project features and/or requirements to achieve this end. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-6 August 2016 574 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures Potential Impacts on Level of Significance Mitigation Measure or Design Feature the environment after Mitigation 5.1 Aesthetics Light and glare AES-1 During the building permit application, evidence must be submitted to prove that the Less than significant proposed work will comply with the City Outdoor Lighting Ordinance of the Municipal Code. 5.2 Air Quality Air emissions during Construction Measures Significant and long-term operation AQ-1 All development projects in the project area must adhere to SCAQMD Rules (see Unavoidable Section 5.2, Air Quality pp. 5.2-6 through 5.2-10 for a list of the applicable rules), for the control of fugitive dust, for the maintenance of construction vehicles and equipment, and forthe use of reduced VOC asphalt, architectural coatings and solvents. Operational Measures AQ-2 Project applicants shall require that ENERGY STAR -compliant appliances are installed where appliances are required on -site. AQ-3 Project applicants shall include high -efficiency lighting that is at least 10 percent more efficient than standard lighting. AQ-4 The City shall ensure compliance with SCAQMD Rule 1186 (limits fugitive dust on paved and unpaved roads and sets certification protocols and requirements for street sweepers) and 2202 (provides employers of 250 or more employees with a menu of options to reduce mobile source emissions generated by employee commutes), during long term operations in the Village. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-7 August 2016 575 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on the environment Mitigation Measure or Design Feature Level of Significance after Mitigation 5.2 Air Quality (Continued) AQ-5 Project applicants shall provide sidewalks within each project boundary and along off -site roadway improvements. AQ-6 All project applicants shall ensure that new and/or remodeled buildings meet or exceed California Building Code Energy Efficiency Standards. AQ-7 All project applicants shall require that all faucets, toilets and showers installed in proposed structures utilize low -flow fixtures that would reduce indoor water demand by 20 percent per CalGreen Standards or more stringent standards if in place at the time development occurs. AQ-8 Project applicants shall implement recycling programs that reduce waste to landfills by a minimum of 75 percent or more stringent standards if in place at the time development occurs. AQ-9 To the extent feasible, project applicants shall use paints and coatings with a VOC content lower than SCAQMD Rule 1113 requires or more stringent standards if in place at the time development occurs, for application to surfaces of residential dwelling units and commercial units within project boundaries. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR W August 2016 576 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on the environment Mitigation Measure or Design Feature Level of Significance after Mitigation 5.3 Biological Resources Avian species including 131O-1 Burrowing Owl. Prior to any land disturbance on currently vacant properties, an Less than significant burrowing owl applicant shall have a biological survey conducted at the project site to determine presence/absence of the species. Results of the survey may determine whether focused surveys must be conducted. If the site survey determines the presence of burrowing owl, mitigation in accordance with the CDFW shall be implemented as follows: • If burrowing owls are identified as being resident on -site outside the breeding season (February 1 through August 31) they may be relocated to other sites by a permitted biologist (permitted by CDFW), as allowed in the CDFW Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (March 2012). • If an active burrow is found during the breeding season, the burrow shall be treated as a nest site and temporary fencing shall be installed at a distance from the active burrow, to be determined by the biologist, to prevent disturbance during grading or construction. Installation and removal of the fencing shall be done with a biological monitor present. 131O-2 Nesting Bird Surveys. Removal of any appropriate vegetation located on a project site shall be conducted outside of the avian nesting season (February through August). If construction must occur during the avian nesting season, a pre -construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted within seven days prior to any ground disturbing activities. If at any time birds are found to be nesting, construction activities within 250 feet of the nest must not occur until it is determined by a qualified biologist that the nest is no longer active. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-9 August 2016 577 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on Level of Significance Mitigation Measure or Design Feature the environment after Mitigation 5.3 Biological Resources (Continued) 131O-3 CVMSHCP Mitigation Fee. New development projects are required to pay the mitigation fees; even those projects located in urban areas. The most current rates (2016) are as follows (but future developments may be subject to updated fees): Dwelling Units Fee 0-8 units $1,301 per unit 8-14 units $541 per unit 14 + units $239 per unit Non -Residential Commercial/industrial $5,809 per acre 5.4 Cultural Resources Historic buildings, and CR-1 Demolition or extensive alteration of the building at 78035-78039 Calle Estado Less than significant unknown buried should be avoided. Overriding considerations to justify the loss of the building resources or human would need to be developed were demolition pursued. Because the building is remains significant for its architectural merits and as one of La Quinta's original downtown commercial buildings, mitigation measures such as photographic and written documentation must be developed prior to any demolition or extensive alteration of this building. Documentation of the building shall follow the Historic American Building Survey (HABS) Level I Standards. This documentation shall include production of high -quality archival print photographs and plan drawings of the building, including but not limited to a floor plan, elevation drawings, and any character -defining features or details on the building. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-10 August 2016 578 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on the environment Mitigation Measure or Design Feature Level of Significance after Mitigation 5.4 Cultural Resources (continued) All work carried out pursuant to the documentation of the building shall be conducted by, or under the direct supervision of a person or persons meeting, at a minimum, the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (48 FIR 44738-39 as revised in 1994) as an architectural historian. A written report detailing the documentation shall be provided to the City of La Quinta upon completion of the work. The report shall be produced on archival materials and filed with the La Quinta Historical Society and Museum and La Quinta Library. CR-2 If redevelopment of 78035-78039 Calle Estado occurs, the design of any new construction adjacent to this one-story Spanish Colonial Revival -style commercial building must be compatible in design, scale, massing, and appearance as stated in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. The design of new construction should not replicate the historic building style resulting in a false sense of history, but it shall not contrast starkly from its architectural style or design. New construction adjacent to this historic resource shall be no more than two stories high, and shall not overpower or overshadow this building (massing/scale). The final design of the new construction should be developed in consultation with a historic architect or architectural historian who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (as published in 36 CFR Part 61). CR-3 The design of any new construction adjacent to the one- and two-story Spanish Colonial and Monterey Revival -style historic resources at 78023 Calle Estado, 77895 Avenida Montezuma, 77885 Avenida Montezuma, and 51001 Eisenhower Drive, shall be compatible in design, scale, massing, and appearance as required by the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. The building design should not attempt to La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR August 2016 579 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on the environment Mitigation Measure or Design Feature Level of Significance after Mitigation 5.4 Cultural Resources (continued) replicate these buildings in appearance, but shall not conflict or contrast with their architectural style. New construction adjacent to these historic resources shall be no more than two stories high, and shall not overpower or overshadow these existing buildings (scale/massing). The final design of the new construction shall be developed in consultation with a historic architect or architectural historian who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (as published in 36 CFR Part 61). CR-4 The design of any new construction within the Village Build -Out Plan Area adjacent to the residences of the La Quinta Cove Thematic Historic District shall be compatible in design, scale, massing, and appearance with existing historical commercial buildings in the Village Commercial zone. The design of new commercial buildings should be compatible with the Spanish Colonial and Monterey Revival architectural style of the existing historical commercial core. New construction adjacent to the La Quinta Cove Thematic Historic District shall be no more than two stories high, and shall not overpower or overshadow the historical residential buildings of the La Quinta Cove as required by the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. The final design of the new construction should be developed in consultation with a historic architect or architectural historian who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (as published in 36 CFR Part 61). CR-5 Because the project site is considered to be highly sensitive for containing prehistoric archaeological deposits in subsurface contexts, a qualified archaeological monitor (and Native American monitor) shall be present during all phases of construction grading La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-12 August 2016 580 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on the environment Mitigation Measure or Design Feature Level of Significance after Mitigation 5.4 Cultural Resources (continued) and trenching activities for any project developed on vacant land that has not been previously surveyed for cultural resources, as illustrated in Exhibit 5.4-1 and any development/ redevelopment project that proposes underground parking. The amount of monitoring shall be determined by the archaeologist through the preparation of a monitoring plan to be prepared prior to commencement of grading. CR-6 A qualified paleontologist shall be retained prior to the start of construction for projects proposed on vacant lots or development/redevelopment projects proposing underground parking. After final depths of impacts are known (from grading plans), a paleontological mitigation plan shall be prepared limited to the proposed deep impact areas (greater than 3 feet) of the project only. In particular, the plan shall (1) clearly define that test trenches that would be dug to the maximum depth of proposed impacts, (2) permit the use of heavy equipment to perform the trenching as all samples will be taken from sidewalls after a stratigraphic profile is developed, (3) require recording of each strata revealed, (4) require radiocarbon dates for each strata, (5) require samples of about 10 kilogram (kg) for each strata with collection of additional samples up to 100 kg for layers rich in vertebrate fossils, (6) require identification and analysis by recognized experts, (7) require an interpretive report, (8) require curation of significant specimens recovered and (9) encourage publication of results. The plan would identify the amount of monitoring required. CR-7 In the event that human remains are uncovered, no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98. The Riverside County Coroner must be La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-13 August 2016 581 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on Level of Significance Mitigation Measure or Design Feature the environment after Mitigation 5.4 Cultural Resources (continued) notified of the find immediately. If the human remains are determined to be prehistoric, the coroner will notify the NAHC, which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD shall complete the inspection of the site within 48 hours of notification and may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. 5.5 Geology and Soils Seismicity GEO-1 Applicants for new structures shall utilize modern building materials and techniques, Less than significant and be built in accordance with the latest version of the California Building Code. GEO-2 Applicants for new development projects, including redevelopment involving changes to building size shall be required to prepare a detailed geotechnical and soils analysis that includes soil sampling, laboratory testing and mitigation measures intended to reduce potential geotechnical hazards to less than significant levels. 5.6 Global Climate Change GHG emissions during GHG-1 Project applicants shall provide sidewalks within the project boundary and along the Significant and long-term operation off -site roadway improvements where these are lacking. Unavoidable GHG-2 Project applicants shall ensure that all building structures meet or exceed 2013 Title 24, Part 6 Standards and meet Green Building Code Standards, or more stringent standards if in place at the time building permits are issued. GHG-3 Project applicants shall ensure that all faucets, toilets and showers installed in the proposed structures utilize low -flow fixtures that would reduce indoor water demand by 20 percent per CalGreen Standards to the satisfaction of the Building Department. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-14 August 2016 582 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on Level of Significance Mitigation Measure or Design Feature the environment after Mitigation 5.6 Global Climate Change (continued) GHG-4 Project applicants shall ensure that ENERGY STAR -compliant appliances are installed where appliances are required on -site. GHG-5 Project applicants shall implement recycling programs that reduce waste to landfills by a minimum of 75 percent. GHG-6 Project applicants shall install high -efficiency lighting be installed that is at least 10 percent more efficient than standard lighting. GHG-7 To the extent feasible, project applicants shall use paints and coatings with a VOC content lower than SCAQMD Rule 1113 requires for application to surfaces of residential dwelling units and commercial units within project boundaries. 5.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Transport, storage, use HAZ-1 All new development projects that propose the use, transport or storage of Less than significant or disposal of hazardous materials in their plan of operations and are defined as a new generator hazardous materials of hazardous materials shall comply with all local, state, and federal regulations, as required by law. HAZ-2 In compliance with Chapter 6.95 of the California Health & Safety Code (HSC) and Title 19, Division 2, of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), all new development that proposes the storage and use of hazardous materials at or above reporting criteria thresholds shall prepare a Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan (HMBEP). The HMBEP shall be reviewed and approved by the County of Riverside CUPA and the Department of Environmental Health prior to the initiation of operation of the business. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-15 August 2016 583 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on Level of Significance Mitigation Measure or Design Feature the environment after Mitigation 5.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials (continued) HAZ-3 All new development projects that propose the use and storage of hazardous materials will be required to prepare a Spill Prevention Counter measurement Contingency Plan (SPCC) that addresses appropriate protocol measures to contain accidental spills of hazardous materials. A SPCC spill kit shall also be placed onsite at the business or facility. HAZ-4 All new development and redevelopment projects within the Village Build -out Plan project area shall submit development plans and permits to the City for review, and City shall coordinate with the Desert Sands Unified School District regarding any proposed land uses that will produce hazardous waste, such as doctor's offices. HAZ-5 All project development proposals shall submit plans to the Fire Department for review and conditioning for safe accessibility of fire and ambulatory services and for appropriate evacuation routing of the project development in the event of an emergency. 5.8 Hydrology and Water Quality Potential for pollutants HWQ-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits on vacant or underutilized parcels that will Less than significant to mix with stormwater be developed within the Village Build -out Plan, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention and enter the storm Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared for all projects within the Village Build -out Plan that drain system disturb one acre or more. The SWPPP shall list appropriate best management Increase in practices (BMPs) for the control and treatment of runoff from the project site. The groundwater usage applicant is responsible for the preparation and implementation of the SWPPP per with increase in urban the NPDES requirements and must file a Notice of Intent with the State Water uses Resource Control Board and receive a Waste Discharge ID Number (WDID), and have a copy of the SWPPP at the project site at all times during construction. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-16 August 2016 584 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on Level of Significance Mitigation Measure or Design Feature the environment after Mitigation 5.8 Hydrology and Water Quality (continued) Potential for new HWQ-2 Prior to the issuance of building permits on vacant parcels within the Village Build - development to out Plan project area, a WQMP for post construction conditions shall list appropriate increase impervious best management practices (BMPs) for the control and treatment of runoff from the surfaces and increase project site. The WQMP must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer or runoff his/her designee and shall demonstrate compliance with California Drainage Law in Potential for developed accordance with CRWQB to assure that discharge of stormwater flow from future properties to be projects is handled in a manner that is reasonably compatible with pre -development affected by flooding conditions. during a major storm HWQ-3 The City of La Quinta is responsible for constructing improvements to the storm drain event evacuation system in the Village Build -out project area. These improvements must be made prior to commencement of development of new projects in the project area, proposed after adoption of the Build -out Plan. Subsequently, prior to issuance of buildings permits for new development on vacant properties or redevelopment of underutilized properties in the project area applicants will pay development impact fees for drainage improvements to the storm drain evacuation system. HWQ-4 Prior to project construction of new projects on vacant lands, or redevelopment projects on currently developed parcels, the project applicant shall pay a Development Impact Fee specific towards funding of storm drain upgrade improvements along Calle Tampico Ave. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-17 August 2016 585 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on the environment Mitigation Measure or Design Feature Level of Significance after Mitigation 5.8 Hydrology and Water Quality (continued) HWQ-5 All project development within the Village Build -out Plan shall coordinate and cooperate with CVWD to ensure City-wide compliance with current State Senate Bill x7-7 to reduce per capita urban water use by 36 percent for year 2016, and 20 percent reduction by year 2020, including landscaping conversion programs and the smart irrigation control program; expanding the availability of sustainable water supplies such as tertiary treated water, and encouraging its use for landscape irrigation purposes, especially for irrigating golf courses and other large landscaped areas, and/or other mandates imposed at the time development occurs. HWQ-6 The City shall review and amend its Development Standards to require that all new development within the Village Build -out Plan demonstrate a reduction of domestic water consumption equivalent to the CalGreen Tier One standards in effect at the time of development. HWQ-7 The City shall continue to implement its Water Efficient Landscape ordinance by requiring that development projects within the Village Build -out Plan implement water efficient landscaping plans to meet or exceed current water efficiency standards. HWQ-8 The City shall require that new development within the Village Build -out Plan reduce its projected water consumption over "business as usual" consumption rates. HWQ-9 The City shall develop programs to allow and encourage the retrofitting of existing water intensive appliances and irrigation systems for existing development within the Village Build -out Plan. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-18 August 2016 586 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on Mitigation Measure or Design Feature Level of Significance the environment after Mitigation 5.8 Hydrology and Water Quality (continued) HWQ-10 The City shall continue to require that all new developments within the Village Build - out Plan use water conserving appliances and fixtures, including low -flush toilets and low -flow showerheads and faucets, as well as the application of water -conserving technologies in conformance with Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code, Title 20, California Administrative Code Section 1601(b), and applicable sections of Title 24 of the State Code. HWQ-11 The City shall continue to encourage that new development within the Village Build - out Plan use faucets, showerheads and appliances that exceed Title 20 and Title 24 water efficiency requirements. 5.9 Land Use and Planning Increased parking LU-1 The City of La Quinta is committed to the success of the Village becoming a more Less than significant demand livable place by creating a more accessible place for residents and visitors to live and visit while downplaying the need for motor vehicles. To that end, and for each new individual project, the City shall implement a required quantification analysis, methodology in the 2006 City of La Quinta Village District Parking Study, parking management strategies, parking supply strategies, and zoning/administration strategies beginning with those identified in Table 5.9-4. 5.10 Noise Noise associated NOI-1 Based on a project's proximity to sensitive receptors, City Staff will determine if a Less than significant with increased traffic Noise Impact Analysis is needed on a project -by -project basis during their review of and population in the project applications. If required, the study shall analyze noise levels within the Village proposed project, and include mitigation measures to assure that the modeled interior and exterior noise levels meet the City's standards. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-19 August 2016 587 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on Level of Significance Mitigation Measure or Design Feature the environment after Mitigation NOI-2 Truck deliveries to businesses in the project area that are adjacent to sensitive land uses shall be limited to daylight hours. 5.10 Population and Housing Creation of new None required Less than significant housing 5.11 Public Services Increased demand on PS-1 The City and Riverside County Fire Department shall continue to confer and coordinate Less than significant public services to ensure that facilities and services within the Village Build -out Plan are expanded in a timely manner. PS-2 The Riverside County Fire Department shall continue to review and evaluate new development proposals and project plans within the Village Build -out Plan to make certain that it can provide adequate fire protection. PS-3 All new development projects within the Village Build -out Plan shall be subject to Police Department review to assure that the Department can provide adequate police protection. PS-4 The City shall monitor City population and Police Department staffing levels to ensure the provision of police protection services at consistent levels. PS-5 Development projects within the Village Build -out Plan shall be assessed statutory school mitigation fees, in place at the time residential and commercial projects are proposed. PS-6 Development projects within the Village Build -out Plan shall be assessed development impact fees, in place at the time residential and commercial projects are proposed. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-20 August 2016 588 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on Level of Significance Mitigation Measure or Design Feature the environment after Mitigation 5.13 Recreation Increased demand on None required Less than significant parks and recreation 5.14 Traffic and Circulation Increased traffic in the The following mitigation measures are recommended for Interim Year With Project traffic Significant and vicinity conditions: Unavoidable CIR-1 Washington Street/Avenida La Fonda (#13): Construct a raised "worm" median to allow northbound left -turns and restrict eastbound left -turns. CIR-2 Jefferson Street/Avenue 52 (#16): Reconstruct the existing roundabout to provide two circulating lanes and two entry lanes at the northbound and southbound approaches. The new two lane roundabout should be constructed with consideration for conversion to a three lane roundabout by General Plan Buildout conditions. The following Mitigation Measures are recommended for General Plan Buildout With Project traffic conditions: CIR-3 Eisenhower Drive/Avenida Montezuma (#3): Convert Eisenhower Drive/Avenida Montezuma from an all -way stop control to a yield -controlled roundabout [this improvement is assumed in the Village Buildout Circulation Plan]. CIR-4 Washington Street/Avenue 48 (#9): Construct the northbound approach to consist of three through lanes and one right -turn lane. Remove the pedestrian crosswalk at the north leg of the intersection. Based on the City's traffic study guidelines, the following circulation improvements are recommended in addition to the roadway improvements identified in the current General Plan Circulation Element: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-21 August 2016 589 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on the environment Mitigation Measure or Design Feature Level of Significance after Mitigation 5.14 Traffic and Circulation (continued) CIR-5 Eisenhower Drive / Calle Tampico (#2): Construct one additional westbound left -turn lane to provide dual left -turn lanes. CIR-6 Avenida Bermudas/Calle Tampico (#5): Construct one additional westbound left -turn lane. The TIA identified an alternative to construct a roundabout rather than adding an additional lane in the event that the improvement identified in the General Plan Circulation Element is infeasible. This will be determined by the Design and Development Director/City Engineer. CIR-7 Desert Club Drive / Calle Tampico (#7): Construct one exclusive northbound right -turn lane and one additional westbound left -turn lane. The TIA identified an alternative to construct a roundabout rather than adding an additional lane in the event that the improvement identified in the General Plan Circulation Element is infeasible. This will be determined by the Design and Development Director/City Engineer. CIR-8 Washington Street/Avenue 48 (#9): Construct one exclusive northbound right -turn lane. CIR-9 Washington Street/Avenue 52 (#14): Construct one additional eastbound left -turn lane to provide triple left -turn lanes. Provide one additional southbound left -turn lane to provide triple left -turn lanes. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-22 August 2016 590 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on Mitigation Measure or Design Feature Level of Significance the environment after Mitigation The following mitigation measure is related specifically to intersections that have been identified to operate at LOS E along Calle Tampico CIR-10 For road segments along Calle Tampico between Avenida Bermudas and Washington Street, the City shall conduct periodic monitoring of actual conditions in the Village (timing to be determined as development begins to occur in the project area, and will review its Parking Demand Management strategies (directly correlated with traffic volumes) to determine additional strategies that can be employed related to remote parking and shuttle service, additional pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and education programs. 5.15 Utilities and Service Systems Increased demand on UTL-1 All new development within the Village Build -out Plan shall be connected to sanitary Less than significant public utilities sewer service. UTL-2 The City shall ensure coordination with CVWD and to assure that existing and future extended sanitary sewer facilities are adequate. UTL-3 The City shall create a tracking log for development projects in the project area that identifies the existing wet and dry infrastructure in the project area, then on a project - by -project basis, inputs the type and size of proposed uses, the potable water required, wastewater generated and electrical demand generated. The City will work with CVWD, IID SCG and others to determine when upgrades to infrastructure will be required. UTL-4 All project development within the Village Build -out Plan shall coordinate and cooperate with CVWD to ensure City-wide compliance with current State Senate Bill x7-7 to reduce per capita urban water use by 36 percent for year 2016, and 20 percent reduction by year 2020, including landscaping conversion programs and the smart irrigation control La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-23 August 2016 591 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on the environment Mitigation Measure or Design Feature Level of Significance after Mitigation 5.15 Utilities and Service Systems (continued) program; expanding the availability of sustainable water supplies such as tertiary treated water, and encouraging its use for landscape irrigation purposes, especially for irrigating golf courses and other large landscaped areas. UTL -5 The City shall review and amend its Development Standards if necessary to require that all new development within the Village Build -out Plan demonstrate a reduction of domestic water consumption equivalent to the CalGreen Tier One standards in effect at the time of development. UTL -6 The City shall continue to implement its Water Efficient Landscape ordinance by requiring that development projects within the Village Build -out Plan implement water efficient landscaping plans to meet or exceed water efficiency standards. UTL-7 The City shall require that new development within the Village Build -out Plan to reduce its projected water consumption over "business as usual" consumption rates. UTL-8 In conjunction with CVWD as well as independently, the City shall develop programs to allow and encourage the retrofitting of existing water intensive appliances and irrigation systems for existing development within the Village Build -out Plan. UTL-9 All new developments shall use water conserving appliances and fixtures, as well as the application of water -conserving technologies in conformance with Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code, Title 20, California Administrative Code Section 1601(b), and applicable sections of Title 24 of the State Code. UTL-10 All new and existing commercial establishments shall be required to comply with State mandates (AB 341) to reduce the amount of packaging and potential waste associated with product manufacturing and sales. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-24 August 2016 592 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1-3 Summary of Environmental Analysis, Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on the environment Mitigation Measure or Design Feature Level of Significance after Mitigation 5.15 Utilities and Service Systems (continued) LITL-11 Prior to the issuance of building permits within the Village Build -out Plan, the City shall continue to refer project developers to Burrtec for development of construction and demolition solid waste recycling plans in order to divert a minimum of 50% of C&D debris from the waste stream. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 1-25 August 2016 593 594 2 INTRODUCTION Chapter 2 Introduction 2.1 Overview of and Authority for the EIR This Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2015101019) has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to evaluate the potential environmental effects associated with the proposed La Quinta Village Build -out Plan. This EIR has been prepared in conformance with CEQA (California Public Resources Code, Section 21000, et seq.), and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000, et seq.) The purpose of an EIR is to disclose information to the public and to decision makers about the potential environmental effects of a proposed project. An EIR does not recommend either approval or denial of a project; rather, it is intended to provide a source of independent and impartial analysis of the foreseeable environmental impacts of a proposed course of action. The project evaluated in this EIR is the adoption of revised development standards and implementation of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan by the City of La Quinta, including the development of new projects on vacant and/or under-utilized properties in the project area. The Build -out Plan provides a roadmap for the physical development of properties in the project area that will be used by City Staff and elected and/or appointed officials to review, and evaluate and process future development proposals. This EIR describes the proposed project, analyzes its environmental effects, and discusses reasonable alternatives that would avoid, reduce, or minimize environmental impacts. The City of La Quinta is the lead agency for the proposed project. The La Quinta City Council will consider the information presented in this document in making an informed decision regarding the approval and conditions of approval, or denial of the project. 2.2 Review of the EIR Upon completion of the preparation of the Draft EIR, the City of La Quinta will file a Notice of Completion (NOC) with the Governor's Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse to begin the public review period (Public Resources Code, Section 21161). Concurrent with the NOC, this Draft EIR will be distributed to responsible and trustee agencies, other affected agencies, surrounding cities, and interested parties, as well as all parties requesting a copy of the Draft EIR in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21092(b)(3). During the public review period, the Draft EIR, including the technical appendices, is available for review at the City of La Quinta Design and Development Department and the La Quinta Library. The addresses for each location are provided below: La Quinta Village Admin Draft EIR 2-1 August 2016 595 2 INTRODUCTION City of La Quinta Community Development Department 78495 Calle Tampico Phone: 760-777-7125 Hours: Monday — Thursday 7:30 am — 5:00 pm and Friday 8:00 am — 5:00 pm. La Quinta Library 78275 Calle Tampico Phone: 760-564-4767 Hours: Monday — Thursday 10:00 am — 7:00 pm, Friday and Saturday 10:00 am — 6:00 pm, and Sunday 12:00 pm — 4:00 pm. Agencies, organizations, and interested parties who wish to comment on the Draft EIR during the 45-day public review period are requested to provide written comments to: Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner Community Development Department 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta CA 92253 Phone: 760-777-7069 Email: ncriste@la-guinta.org Upon completion of the public review period, written responses to all public comments received will be prepared and included in the Final EIR. Responses to comments received will be made available for review at least 10 days prior to the public hearing before the City Council, at which the certification of the EIR will be considered. Comments received and the responses to comments will be included as part of the record for consideration by decision makers for the project. 2.3 Scope of the EIR The Village Build -out Plan EIR is a subsequent EIR tiered from the Program EIR certified for the La Quinta General Plan in 2013. Tiering refers to using the analysis of general matters contained in a broader EIR such as the General Plan EIR, with later EIRs or negative declarations prepared for more focused projects (CEQA Guidelines Section 15152(a)) where the subsequent document focuses solely on the issues specific to the later project; in this EIR that is the Village Build -out Plan. Tiering can be used when a project is consistent with the General Plan and zoning of the city in which the project is located (CEQA Guidelines Section 15152(e)). Finally when tiering is used, the later EIR or negative declaration shall refer to the prior EIR and state where a copy of the prior EIR is available for review. The lead agency must also state that that it is using the tiering concept and that it is La Quinta Village Admin Draft EIR 2-2 August 2016 596 2 INTRODUCTION being tiered with the earlier EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15152 (g)). The City's General Plan and EIR may be reviewed at the City's Design and Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, or on line at the City's web site: http://www.la-guinta.org/your- government/community-development/planning-division/2035-la-guinta-general-plan The City of La Quinta issued a Notice of Preparation (NOP) to prepare an EIR for a 30-day review period between October 5 and November 3, 2015. An Initial Study was prepared that accompanied the Notice of Preparation of the Draft EIR. The purpose of the Initial Study was to conduct a preliminary evaluation of the proposed La Quinta Village Build -out Plan in order to determine the focus of the Draft EIR. The Initial Study determined that there would be no environmental impacts associated with the proposed project for Agriculture and Forestry Resources, and Mineral Resources. The findings of the Initial Study are summarized in EIR Chapter 8, Other CEQA Required Sections. The NOP was circulated through the State Clearinghouse and sent to all responsible agencies, adjacent cities and the County of Riverside, and to interested parties. Issues raised by agencies and the public in response to the NOP were considered in the preparation of the Draft EIR. The NOP is contained in Appendix A of this EIR. The City received five comment letters in addition to the letter received from the Governor's Office of Planning and Research stating that the 30-day review period ended and providing any comments from State agencies. Comments Received: Desert Sands Unified School District 1. Impacts on the District must be addressed in the EIR using the student generation rates to project fair shares of "true costs" of new school facilities. South Coast Air Quality Management District 1. Use SCAQMD's Air Quality Handbook, and the most recent guidance to evaluate Air Quality, including the latest CalEEMod software to evaluate regional impacts and localized air quality impacts. 2. If applicable, conduct a mobile source health risk assessment. Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission 1. After reviewing the NOP, the ALUC determined that the project area is outside the boundaries of all Airport Influence Areas. La Quinta Village Admin Draft EIR 2-3 August 2016 597 2 INTRODUCTION Imperial Irrigation District 1. The IID provided input on its requirements for rights -of -way and easements, and stated that any construction or operation on IID property will require an encroachment permit. 2. If a new IID facility is required or an existing facility must be modified or reconstructed, this should be included in the CEQA documentation to ensure that environmental impacts are fully mitigated. Southern California Association of Governments 1. The project should be evaluate for consistency with the goals and strategies of SCAG's Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. 2.4 Organization of the EIR This EIR has been prepared as a project level EIR to evaluate the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan which, when implemented, will guide future development of a mix of land uses in the Village. The EIR is organized into the following main chapters and sections: Chapter 1: Executive Summary. This section includes a summary of the proposed La Quinta Village Build -out Plan and a discussion of the alternatives to the project. A brief description of the areas of controversy and issues to be resolved, an overview of the potential impacts, mitigation measures, and level of significance after mitigation, are included in this section. Chapter 2: Introduction. This chapter provides an introduction and overview describing the purpose of the EIR, its scope and components, and its review and certification process. This chapter also includes a summary of the comments received on the Notice of Preparation. Chapter 3: Project Description. This chapter includes a detailed description of the proposed project, including its location, existing site conditions, and project characteristics. A discussion of the project objectives, intended uses of the EIR, responsible agencies and their roles in the environmental process, and approvals that are needed for the proposed project are provided. Chapter 4: Environmental Setting. This chapter identifies the project site boundaries and the environmental setting on a local, City-wide and Regional level. Chapter 5: Environmental Impact Analysis. This chapter contains a comprehensive evaluation of the environmental impacts of the proposed project. Impacts are organized into major environmental topics. Each section includes a description of the environmental setting (the physical environment and the regulatory environment), methodology for evaluating impacts, significance criteria, potential impacts, a discussion of existing agency rules and regulations imposed on the project to reduce potential environmental effects of the project, proposed mitigation measures (in La Quinta Village Admin Draft EIR 2-4 August 2016 598 ATTACH M ENT 1 2 INTRODUCTION addition to environmental requirements already imposed on the project by regulatory agencies), and a finding of the level of significance after mitigation. The impact evaluation considers: direct impacts, indirect impacts, and cumulative impacts. The following specific environmental topics are addressed within Chapter 5. Section 5.1 — Aesthetics: Addresses the visual impacts that may occur with build -out of the La Quinta Village area. Section 5.2 — Air Quality: Addresses the local and regional air quality impacts associated with project implementation as well as consistency with the SCAQMD 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). This section also includes an evaluation of Health Risk associated with Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) generated by on -site equipment and trucks that will access the site. Finally, this section addressed the potential for odors to affect existing and future sensitive receptors in the vicinity. Section 5.3 — Biological Resources: Addresses the project's impacts on habitat and wildlife in the area. Section 5.4 — Cultural Resources: Addresses the impacts of project development on historic buildings, archaeological and paleontological resources, and on Native American Cultural resources. Section 5.5 — Geology and Soils: Addresses the potential impacts the project may have on soils, and assesses the effects of project development in relation to geologic and seismic conditions. Section 5.6 — Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Addresses the project's estimated contribution to global warming through the emission of greenhouse gasses during construction and long term operation of the proposed Build -out Plan. Section 5.7 — Hazards and Hazardous Materials: Addresses the likelihood of the presence of hazardous materials or conditions on the project site and in the project area that may have the potential to impact human health. It also addresses hazards that may be associated with new uses. Section 5.8 — Hydrology and Water Quality: Addresses the impacts of the project on local hydrological conditions, including drainage areas, and changes in the flow rates. This section also summarizes the requirements under the County's MS4 Permit for stormwater control, retention and release. Section 5.9 — Land Use and Planning: Addresses the related land use impacts associated with implementation of the project, including the project's compatibility with surrounding land uses, and consistency with the City General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and regional Conservation Plans. Section 5.10 — Noise: Addresses the noise impacts that may occur during construction and operation of future land uses based on compliance with the City's Noise Ordinance. La Quinta Village Admin Draft EIR 2-5 August 2016 599 ATTACH M ENT 1 2 INTRODUCTION Section 5.11 — Population and Housing: Addresses the potential of the proposed project to induce direct or indirect population growth. Section 5.12 — Public Services: Addresses the impacts upon public service providers including fire, police, schools, parks, and other recreational facilities. Section 5.13 — Recreation: Addresses the potential impacts on recreation opportunities and recreational facilities. Section 5.14 — Traffic and Circulation: Addresses the impacts on the local and regional roadway system, parking, emergency access, public transportation, bicycle, and pedestrian access. Section 5.15 — Utilities and Service Systems: Addresses the impacts on water supply, wastewater treatment, storm drains, and solid waste. Chapter 6: Other CEQA Required Sections. This chapter provides a summary of significant environmental impacts, including unavoidable and growth -inducing impacts, and the Build -out Plan's irreversible and irretrievable commitment of resources. This chapter also provides a summary of environmental issues where findings can be made that the project would not cause an impact on the environment or that the impact would be negligible and therefore and explains why no further analysis in the EIR was required. Chapter 7: Alternatives to the Proposed Project. This chapter compares the impacts of the proposed project with three project alternatives: the No Project Alternative where no additional development would occur; a Less Intensive Alternative - Build -out Under the Existing General Plan; and an Alternative without the commercial center at the northwest corner of Washington Street and Calle Tampico. An environmentally superior alternative is identified. Chapter 8: Report Preparers. This chapter outlines the authors and staff that assisted in the preparation of the EIR, by name and affiliation. Chapter 9: References. This chapter contains a full list of references that were used in the preparation of the EIR. Appendices: Includes all notices and other procedural documents pertinent to the preparation of the EIR, as well as all technical material prepared to support the environmental analysis. 2.5 Reference Documents 2.5.1 Documents Incorporated by Reference As permitted by CEQA Guidelines Section 15150, this EIR has referenced several public documents. Information from the documents, has been incorporated by reference, and has been briefly summarized in the appropriate sections(s). La Quinta Village Admin Draft EIR 2-6 August 2016 .011 ATTACH M ENT 1 2 INTRODUCTION Documents include: La Quinta General Plan 2035, 2013 La Quinta General Plan 2035 Program Environmental Impact Report, 2013 La Quinta Village Design Guidelines La Quinta Zoning Ordinance 2.5.2 Documents Prepared for the Project The technical studies prepared for the proposed project and other informational documents are listed below. These documents are included in their entirety on a CD at the back of this EIR. Appendix A Notice of Preparation and Comments Received Appendix B Air Quality/Global Climate Change Analysis Appendix C NRCS Custom Soils Report Appendix D EDR Report Appendix E City of La Quinta Focused Area Drainage Study Appendix F Downtown Area Drainage Study for City of La Quinta Appendix G La Quinta Village Hydrology Study Appendix H Traffic Impact Assessment La Quinta Village Admin Draft EIR 2-7 August 2016 601 ATTACH M ENT 1 INTRODUCTION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Admin Draft EIR 2-8 August 2016 .9. ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Chapter 3 Project Description 3.1 Overview The project evaluated in this EIR is the implementation of the Village Build -out Plan (Plan) by the City of La Quinta; as well as a Zoning Code text amendment to increase the building height limitation from 35 feet to 60 feet within the Plan area; to reflect the increase in density, opportunities to create a more accessible area for non -motorized transportation; and to address the latest requirements for landscaping and irrigation. The EIR also evaluates the discontinuance of the La Quinta Village Design Guidelines (adopted in 1998) as the standards and guidelines for development in the Village. It is the City's intent moving forward, that new projects be reviewed on their own merits and how they integrate with other projects in the Village. In addition, in September 2015, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 528 which amended the Zoning Code to reduce the number of required parking spaces for properties within the Village Commercial Zoning District, for an interim period ending September 4, 2016. The intent is to encourage residents and visitors to frequent more than one business while visiting the Village, and for businesses to share parking when feasible. The Plan provides a roadmap for the physical development of properties in the Village Build -out Plan project area that will be used by City Staff and decision makers to review, evaluate and process future development proposals in the project area. This chapter includes all of the required elements for a Project Description as outlined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15124 including the location of the project area; a statement of objectives sought by the City in proposing the Plan; a general description of the project's technical, economic and environmental characteristics; a statement describing the intended use of the EIR; and a list of public agencies that must make decisions and/or issue permits for projects within the project area. The City of La Quinta (City) has undertaken a planning process to develop a build -out plan for the Village, its traditional downtown, that would provide for a mix of uses including: 1) vertical mixed use — where retail or professional office space occurs on the ground floor, with residential units above; 2) horizontal mixed use — where retail or professional office uses and higher density residential occur next to each other, and are integrated through pedestrian connections and common areas; or 3) mixed use added to existing commercial development where the residential project abuts or wraps around an existing commercial development. By creating a build -out plan that will foster the continued development of the Village as a pedestrian -oriented mixed use environment, and evaluating the potential environmental impacts of the Plan in this EIR, the City will be able to offer La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-1 August 2016 603 ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION property owners and developers the opportunity to streamline the planning process for their projects. There is no time table for ultimate build out to occur, as development will be driven by market forces and demand for new residential units and additional non-residential uses in the Village. However, 2035 represents the horizon year for the City's General Plan adopted in 2013, therefore it is reasonable to assume a similar time frame for the build -out of the City's Village. In addition, to provide a benchmark for growth in the Build -out Plan project area and continue to plan for future development in the project area, the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) included an analysis of an Interim Year (2021). The intent is to evaluate a build -out scenario that will allow future projects to be approved based on the analysis provided in this EIR along with a menu of mitigation measures and performances standards that must be met in order to ensure that impacts on the physical environment would be less than significant. Intended Use of the EIR The City of La Quinta is the lead agency for the proposed project. The La Quinta City Council will consider the information presented in this document in making an informed decision regarding the approval and conditions of approval, or denial of the project. In addition, the EIR will be used in the evaluation of subsequent projects that will be proposed in the Village Build -out Plan project area. 3.2 Project Location and Setting The project area consists of approximately 137 acres of land, generally located north and south of Calle Tampico, east of Eisenhower Drive and west of Washington Street, and north of Avenue 52. Properties to the north of Calle Tampico include the 9.3-acre property at the northwest corner of Calle Tampico and Washington Street, currently developed as a commercial center, existing offices, commercial and resort development (the Embassy Suites Hotel), as well as an apartment complex and school located on the east side of Eisenhower Drive. The project area is located in Sections 6 and 7, Township 6 South and Range 6/7 East, La Quinta 7.5" quad, and near its geographic center, Latitude/Longitude 33° 40' 34.1" N and 116' 18' 18.9" E. Exhibit 3-1, Regional Location, shows the location of the City in relation to the larger Coachella Valley area of Riverside County. Exhibit 3-2, City of La Quinta City Boundaries, shows the City's corporate boundary with the project area highlighted. Existing Conditions Exhibit 3-3, Project Site and Vicinity, shows boundaries of the Build -Out plan project area; and Exhibit 3-4, Site Photos, shows typical properties in the area. The locations of the site photos are shown in Exhibit 3-3. The surrounding area outside the boundaries of the project area is largely developed with La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-2 August 2016 604 ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION residential uses. Table 3-1, Existing Conditions in the Project Area, lists the land use types and development data in the project area. There are approximately 21 acres of vacant land in the project area that could be developed with a mix of uses, such as commercial, professional, and/or residential. Table 3-1 Existing Conditions in the Project Area Land Use Dwelling Units Square Feet Acres Residential Single Family 33 0.99 Multi -Family 251 14.01 Commercial Commercial 151,925 85.90 Other Land Uses Hotels + Casitas 290 11.75 Civic Center 18.82 School 12.74 Park 6.50 Vacant 20.18 Total 284 du and 290 hotel rooms 1511925 136.74 Source: City of La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Land Use Data, August 2015. In addition, as described in Table 3-2, approximately 30 acres within the Plan area have the potential to redevelop, and 86 acres are expected to remain in their current developed condition. Table 3-2 Existing and Potential New Development in the Project Area Existing Potential Existing New Non - Land Use Acres Residential New Non- Residential Units (DU)' Residential Residential Square TOTAL Units (DU) Square Feet Feet Vacant Land 20.70 -- 436 -- 288,330 -- Land with the Potential for Redevelopment 30.20 -- 794 12,400 511,456 Existing Developed 284 DU Properties with no +290 hotel 85.90 139,525 -- -- Change in Land Use or rooms & Increased Density casitas 284 DU 1,481 DU, 290 +290 hotel hotel/ casita Total 136.74 1,230 DU 151,925 799,786 rooms & 960,711 square casitas feet Source: City of La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Land Use Data, August 2015. Notes: 1. Residential unit count includes existing residences, single - and multi -family. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-3 August 2016 605 ATTACH M ENT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-4 August 2016 .U, ATTACH M ENT 1 Yucca 'J n l l wy N //pp W+E S Mvango V ah6p ------------- 1)-.1 riot � SPfI Fl{(fi Dill.. Rd IkAh Palm Spr1n 4p �F �d Ca ac lrefLr 4 Vatbt pP4 r,ra,e rr. Palm Ra Springs ad Thousand Paumlr P Cathedral I, err aln F wn D, City Rancho l i ari k sl ll a r e or Mtra9a aauntrr ctoh tar Ili = UhleR y Frad wdalnpo+ a CA-111 IPdo A. F. mill l'�lhn -rr 'e,ll� pinta Coachella .c 5�na A,, PG a o YA,rpart tilra Pla al 4 11t kinI A— yeMrq t�3 So ' ..A 661h Aur t:1. Nl.lf •.: Ilnll?e {q lip 195 6 1 inch = 6 miles E115 The Altum Group Regional Vicinity La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 3-1 607 ATTACH M ENT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-6 August 2016 .9; ATMOMENT 1 N E 4nd Ave A-,.. 44 W. nY CA -Ili % EfdS CA Ras Avwue48 wh 501h Awe 52nLIAve t 541h A- A'. Aagiz Indl; eslincramon ery Alfpar I ElIv d 5uth A— ,—.1 rr6 Wh Ave 641,th A — Legend Qnd Avo La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Project Area 6 411. A City of La Quinta Corporate Boundary 560, A.. 1 inch = 1.5 miles E115 The Alturr, Group City of La Quinta Corporate Boundary La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 3-2 609 ATTACH M ENT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-8 August 2016 610 ATTACH ENT 1 , ,* Jr. elf 4 d , In 10 A M 40", A zo V ay ;0 AM W_ F 'r r 1 0 P, O P, !'IPA v F WP ICIV, "t-, 1! Of WW'414 41t 1 7 afg, le . �� OVA n, "0. IN AnO I-F WKN �z 1w 0 MW t T iij Lu LU 4 641 Lp 4F A LLF F STARO,, ILLE A LU_. Ld M9 X 7 __J L-L-E, I BAL AMARA I _Jypf p > ..... ..... LIJ V Aw J ""0 U 1A A a El 1-5 The Altura Group I UJ UJ _J '44 ,p < Legend 1 IDA Village Commercial Zoning District AVFNLJF 52 Ulln e Design ('_H'Anhre Pni inr4nr Y MC Village E I R Project Area N Photo Locations S Project Site and Vicinity La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 3-3 611 ATTACH M ENT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-10 August 2016 612 ATTACH M ENT 1 Photo 3: View to the southeast along Avenida Montezuma showing the La Quinta Museum Source: Site Visit, 2015 E115 The Altum Group Photo 2: View to the northeast along Calle Tampico showing Benjamin Franklin Elementary School Photo 4: View of vacant land in the project area facing west. Santa Rosa Mtns are in the background. Site Photos La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 613 3-4 ATTACH M ENT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-12 August 2016 614 ATTACH M ENT 1 Source: Site Visit, 2015 The Altum croup Photo 8: View of the park at the La Quinta Civic Center complex, facing northeast. Site Photos La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 615 4-4 ATTACH M ENT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-14 August 2016 ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION General Plan Designations Land Use Designation Definitions Exhibit 3-5, General Plan Land Use Designations, shows the existing General Plan land use designations for sites in the project area. The Land Use designations for the project area are Village Commercial, General Commercial (Shopping Center), Major Community Facilities (Civic Center, schools and utility facilities), and Recreational Open Space (La Quinta Community Park). Land uses within the Village Commercial designation include a mix of uses including commercial, professional office, and residential. Village Commercial The Village Commercial Designation applies specifically to the traditional Commercial core of the City, and allows specialty retail; such as boutiques and art galleries as well as restaurants, professional offices and services, and hotels. Apartments, condominiums and live -work space is also appropriate in this designation. As established in General Plan 2035 Policy LU-7.1, mixed use development is allowed in this designation. Mixed use projects can include vertical or horizontal combinations of land uses that are integrated through pedestrian connections and common areas; or can include residential units added to existing commercial development. General Commercial This Land Use designation applies to the northwest corner of Washington Street and Calle Tampico in the Plan area. The full range of commercial uses can occur within this designation, ranging from supermarkets and drugstores in a neighborhood shopping center, to major national retailers in large buildings. General Commercial uses also include professional offices, service businesses, restaurants, hotels or motels, research and development and warehousing or similar low impact quasi -industrial projects. As established in General Plan 2035 Policy LU-7.1, mixed use development is also appropriate in this designation. Major Community Facilities The Major Community Facilities Land Use designation has been assigned to existing or planned municipal, educational or public facilities; such as City and Desert Sands Unified School District facilities and buildings, utility facilities and buildings, fire stations, and public parking lots and similar uses. Recreational Open Space The Recreational Open Space designation applies to parks, recreation facilities (such as driving ranges, club houses and athletic facilities), and public and private golf courses. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-15 August 2016 617 ATTACH M ENT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-16 August 2016 618 ATTACH M ENT 1 U Q L O 'z Q Source: City of La Quinta GIS 1 inch = 400 feet E115 The Altum Group f V CALLE HIDALGO Q J_ N > z o 'z o Q W CALLE.SINALOA - i co w m 0 W Q I I J U w w 0 CALLE ESTADO CALLEFORTUNA i I CALLE CAD/Z ' I CALLE BARCELONA i i i I CALLEAMIGO DESERT FALL �G WINTER COVE i CIO W w BLUE SKY Q N I --------AVENIDAwLwAIF`®NDAr — - — -- Q m o w = W Q Y z W J J J J Q J J U U U U U NUESTRA AVENUE 52 - — - 0 Z General Plan Land Use Designations La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Environmental Impact Report AVENIDA ULTIMO AVENIDA TUJUNGA co r � m O � J C J 10 AVENUE AVENIDA NARANJA CALLE TAMPICO Legend La Quinta Village Build -out Project Boundary General Plan Designations CG General Commercial LDR Low Density Residential = 5 MC Major Community Facilities MHDR Medium/High Density Residential OS-R Open Space - Recreation Right -of -Way VC Village Commercial Exhibit 3-5 ATTACH M ENT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-18 August 2016 620 ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Zoning District Definitions Exhibit 3-6, Zoning Designations, shows the existing zoning designations for sites in the project area. Zoning in the project area include Village Commercial, Neighborhood Commercial (Shopping Center), Major Community Facilities (Civic Center, schools and utility facilities), and Parks and Recreation (La Quinta Community Park). As part of the General Plan and Zoning Consistency Review conducted during the General Plan Update, Commercial Zoning designations, including the Neighborhood Commercial designation, are consistent with the General Commercial Land Use Designation. Village Commercial (VQ Zoning Requirements The City's Municipal Code, Title 9 contains the Zoning Code. Chapter 9.65, Village Commercial District provides specific guidance on the permitted uses and design guidelines for development in the La Quinta Village; in addition, the La Quinta Village: Design Guidelines, were adopted in 1998. The role of the design guidelines is to regulate uses and structures within the Village, implement the concepts and guidance set forth in the guidelines. Land uses and development proposed in the Village are designed and evaluated in conjunction with those guidelines. Purpose of Design and Development. The following purpose statements reflect the design concepts envisioned by the guidelines: 1. Develop the Village area as a year-round commercial, residential and recreational location, serving residents and guests of the greater La Quinta community; 2. Promote development standards to accommodate projects and activities which will provide goods, services and housing in a design environment supportive of the concepts set out in the guidelines: promoting pedestrian accessibility and scale, maintaining connections to La Quinta's artistic and architectural heritage, and guiding design to acknowledge and embrace the desert environment. Section 9.65.015 of Chapter 9.65 requires that all new development proposals on parcels one-half acre or greater must be developed under a specific plan. A "new development proposal" is defined as new building construction proposed for vacant property or associated with demolition and reconstruction of an existing building. The purpose in requiring a specific plan is to ensure: 1. Consistency with General Plan. The plan or amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the general plan. 2. Public Welfare. Approval of the plan or amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. 3. Land Use Compatibility. The specific plan is compatible with zoning on adjacent properties. 4. Property Suitability. The specific plan is suitable and appropriate for the subject property. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-19 August 2016 621 ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Because the Village Build -out Plan encompasses the Village and some adjacent properties, the City has proposed a build -out scenario that will allow flexibility in the types of uses, building heights and building setbacks, to provide the opportunity for future applicants to creatively design a pedestrian friendly, bicycle friendly, livable City center. The design guidelines' requirements, including architectural guidelines and the requirement for a Specific Plan for developments on land greater than one half acre, will be eliminated with implementation of the Plan. Flexibility is the key in that under the Existing Zoning Code, the Village Commercial Zone allows for a variety of land use types that, when combined with increased accessibility and the relaxation of building heights will encourage a walkable, livable mixed use community within the heart of the City. Permitted uses in the Village Commercial Zone include: • Multifamily Residential Dwellings • Commercial guest lodging • Indoor or outdoor professional art studios, displays and/or galleries • Professional service offices providing limited sales • Prepared food service • Public indoor assembly/entertainment facilities • Indoor facilities for education, training, self-help and improvement • Indoor/outdoor cultural, historic and similar displays and • Retail merchandise sales of limited goods The permitted uses in the Village area do not preclude other similar uses which are compatible with the specifically identified uses and otherwise meet the criteria of the Zoning Ordinance. General Development Standards General development standards include standards for setbacks, parking, pedestrian access, height, landscaping, visual screening, lighting and signage. Neighborhood Commercial (CN) The Neighborhood Commercial (CH) district is intended to provide for the development and regulation of small-scale commercial areas located at the intersections of arterial highways as shown on the General Plan. The CN district is intended to provide for the sale of food, drugs, sundries and personal services to meet the daily needs of a neighborhood area. The existing shopping center at the northwest corner of Washington Street and Calle Tampico is zoned CN and includes a variety of retail uses to serve the neighborhood. This site has the potential to increase the amount of commercial uses under the Village Build -out Plan by approximately 52,000 square feet. This site may also include residential, as it is considered part of the residential unit count allowed north of Calle Tampico in Table 3-3. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-20 August 2016 622 ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Major Community Facilities (MC) The Major Community facilities in the Village Build -out area are as follows: 1. Buildings and open space associated with the Civic Center located at the southwest corner of Washington Street and Calle Tampico. The Civic Center includes the City Hall, Civic Center Park, Library and Wellness Center. 2. A City -owned parking lot located between Avenida Bermudas on the east, and Avenida Navarro on the west, east of the La Quinta Community Park. 3. The La Quinta Museum located on the southeast corner of Avenida Montezuma and Avenida Mendoza, immediately south of the La Quinta Community Park. 4. Benjamin Franklin Elementary School at the northeast corner of Eisenhower Drive and Calle Tampico. 5. John Adams Elementary School located east of Desert Club Drive and north of Springtime Way. The school closed permanently at the end of the 2015/2016 school year. No new uses are proposed for these sites. Parks and Recreation (PR) La Quinta Community Park is located east of Eisenhower Drive south of Calle Tampico. The site includes a baseball field, courts, play equipment and the Community Fitness Center. No new uses are proposed for this site. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-21 August 2016 623 ATTACH M ENT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-22 August 2016 624 ATTACH M ENT 1 of La Quinta GIS 1 inch = 400 feet E115 The Altum Group J i ` I AA 0 � ` s� �SPRI NG�TIIV C w C i P�� m C - � o Q ------------------- W CALLE ESTADO CALLS►FpRTUNq CALLE HIDALGO CALLE Q - J N > I O Z � I w z Q Q 0 W CALLE SINALOA--- ---- > Q CADIZ ■ - - DESERT FALL WINTER COVE CIO W w BLUE SKY Q w gf Q c� Q UJLU O U Q w J J J J Q J J U U U U U AVENIDA N_UE_S_ _T_ RA AVENUE 5PP_2 ONA — —_ — -- �— — — — _ O CALLE AM GI O-° f.- Zoning Designations La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Environmental Impact Report _ AVENIDA ULTIMO �r AVENIDA TUJUNGA m O UJ 10 C J N W E i o S Z O ct J J AVENIDA NARANJA Legend La Quinta Village Build -out Project Boundary Zoning Designations CN Neighborhood Commercial FP Floodplain GC Golf Course MC Major Community Facilities PR Parks and Recreation AVENUE 5 ® RC Cove Residential RL Low Density Residential J, RM Medium Density Residential Right -of -Way VC Village Commercial Exhibit 3-6 ATTACH M ENT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-24 August 2016 o: ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.3 Project Description The City of La Quinta experienced significant growth in the 1990's and 2000's. This growth shifted the focus of commercial activity in the City from The Village, the traditional small-scale commercial core, to the major retail outlets on the Highway 111 corridor. However, the Village has remained a focus of the City's economic development strategy since incorporation. Over the years, the City has completed several planning efforts, with varying levels of success. The 2035 General Plan, adopted in 2013, included the Village as a focus area, and added provisions to encourage mixed use development in this area. At this time, development interest in The Village is increasing, and the City wishes to have all the tools it needs in place to encourage and promote development, including the ability for applicants to develop multi -story buildings in order to meet the City's goal for increased density in the Village. As described above, the focus of the Village Build -out Plan is on Village Commercial designated properties, and the lands immediately north of Calle Tampico, including the Neighborhood Commercial site at the northwest corner of Calle Tampico and Washington Street. As shown in Exhibit 3-6 the majority of the Village Build -out Plan project area that is either vacant or could be redeveloped is designated Village Commercial. Project Objectives The City's goal is to continue to develop the Village as a livable and sustainable neighborhood - reminiscent of older cities - where land uses are more interconnected, compact, and offer a mix of uses, providing opportunities for people to live, work, and shop within the neighborhood. In order to achieve this goal, a number of objectives have been identified based on the concept of mixed - use. The City's objectives in proposing the Village Build -out Plan are as follows: • Continue the development of the Village as a mixed use neighborhood by encouraging additional residential and commercial development. • Amend the Zoning Code Text for the Village Commercial District, south of Calle Tampico to encourage mixed use development, and allow an increase in building height (subject to site plan review on a project by project basis) to allow an increase in density of residential uses. • Ensure that public facilities and infrastructure are adequate to support the increase in intensity of land uses in the Village. • Capitalize on unique development opportunities in the Village area by focusing on shopping, dining, entertainment, professional and mixed use options while improving the aesthetics of the community. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-25 August 2016 627 ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Enforce existing development standards that: 1) create attractive, useable and safe public spaces; and 2) promote safe indoor and outdoor spaces and provide emergency services that are adequately funded, staffed, and equipped to provide timely responses. Project Description The proposed project is the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan that identifies future development and redevelopment opportunities in the project area; and assumes development of the remaining vacant properties, as well as redevelopment of underutilized properties with more intensive uses. This would include residential development at densities of 20-30 dwelling units per acre, which is higher than the density allowed under the High Density Residential designation, up to 16 dwelling units per acre. The Village Commercial zoning designation allows multifamily residential dwellings such as condominiums, apartments and similar housing types at densities determined on a site specific basis, based on the development capacity for the proposed uses on the site. The Planning Commission ultimately determines the density of a proposed project. Related to the Plan are proposed Zoning Code text amendments to allow the increase in density and height in the Village Commercial District. Table 3-2 shows total acreage in the project area and the data for existing and potential future uses. This density can be achieved only by eliminating the height restriction of 35 feet and allowing for buildings to be 3 to 5 stories, determined on a project by project basis through site plan review. Table 3-3 Build -out Assumptions by Area, lists new land developed on the underutilized properties in the Village Build -out Plan project area. Exhibit 3-7, Village Build -Out Plan Analysis, shows a geographic representation of Table 3-3. There is one approved mixed -use project in the Village (the Villas at Old Town) and, other specific projects are currently proposed, therefore, the City has made assumptions for future opportunities for development in the Village Build -out Plan project area. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-26 August 2016 628 ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Table 3-3 Build -out Assumptions by Area Build -out Area Assumptions' Existing/Future Existing/Future Residential' Non Res (sq ft)3 Ground floor commercial and residential above Existing: 3 du Existing: 22,825 East of Bermudas 50% res @20du/ac and Future: 396 du Future: 302,531 50% @25 du/ac Total: 399 du Total: 343,356 West of Navarro Ground floor commercial Existing: 23 du Existing: 7,200 and and @20du/ac and 50% Future: 130 du Future: 21,800 @25 du/ac Total: 153 du Total: 29,000 sq ft Between Navaro Ground floor commercial Existing: 6 du Existing: 11,000 and Bermudas and residential above Future: 59 du Future: 45,410 100% @25du/ac Total: 65 du Total: 56,410 North of Calle Ground floor commercial Existing: 251 du Tampico and residential above plus 290 hotel rooms Existing: 98,500 100% @30 du/ac Future: 613 du Future: 346,465 Total: 864 du Total: 444,965 65 Misc Lots % acre 2-story buildings Existing: 1 du Existing: 12,400 of less Commercial only, no Future: 0 du Future: 92,600 residential Total: 1 du Total: 105,000 TOTAL Existing: 284 du Existing: 151,925 Future: 1,198 du Future: 808,786 Total: 1,482 du Total 960,711 Source: City of La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Land Use Data, August 2015. Notes: 1. Assumes new dwelling units will be developed over commercial uses, in multiple story buildings. 2. Assumes the existing dwelling units will remain in place. 3. Assumes that some existing non-residential buildings will be replaced with new buildings. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-27 August 2016 629 ATTACH M ENT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-28 August 2016 630 ATTACH M ENT 1 h E115 The Altura Group 737 AC �.J. • ■ ■ �7aoo sr 36,451 AC ■ �Y Al ■ b •—� e a M1)_- ■ fir .1' � - - z4 AC LI, 95 fiC A �■1l L E Q ie ou ■+'._ .Z[IO cf i 03 jt AC gem - Sq4 bC J 990A .•. d Zd AL 09AC 806[; .. � k Y/!J' �� .19.6V!. 1J 11 d 5n Ai'.- ^ - I AC V 1,15 ■ 'i.72 AC _4A0 k ■ l.,,AS snc .15At ■ 6.5 AC ■ l;anau xa,l �` 1.i5 RC � ]a A2 �► '33- .F3 ':S!'ki - S1, gV9A ■ ■ ■ 8.j n uB a+: 1 DU _ LU - LE W z LLI © ¢= w GALLE HIDALGQLIJS.bsa.l W d A7.SBAC r. L t ■ ZF d z ul NAL an I& ■ 139 AC p_ I I.j SU A Lam` hi.. RC " I�- WYNTER.CQVE AVENIDA LA FONDA m � z W � U U AVENIDA NUESTRA AVENUE 52 " . _j -� - r 4� k < D� J GQ�Q AWDNQl Village Build -out Plan Analysis La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Environmental Impact Report In.0 p 1� V Legend Vacant Land Potential Redevelopment Existing Development Not to be changed —" Village Commercial —..� Boundary N Assessor's Parcels S- W 47 E S Exhibit 3-7 631 ATTACH M ENT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-30 August 2016 632 ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Roadway Improvements In order to encourage residents and visitors that the Village is a walkable, bikeable community, certain road improvements are proposed that are designed to slow vehicle traffic on the main streets. See Exhibit 3-8, Village Build -out Circulation Plan. 0 Conversion of Eisenhower Drive/Calle Tampico from a traffic signal control to a yield - controlled roundabout; 0 Conversion of Eisenhower Drive/Avenida Montezuma from an all -way stop control to a yield -controlled roundabout; 0 Conversion of Avenida Bermudas/Calle Tampico from a traffic signal control to a yield controlled roundabout; • Conversion of Avenida Bermudas/Calle Sinaloa from a traffic signal control to a yield controlled roundabout (with a northbound right -turn bypass lane); • Conversion of Desert Club Drive/Calle Tampico from a traffic signal control to a yield - controlled roundabout; • Modification of Eisenhower Drive between Calle Tampico and Calle Sinaloa from two lanes in each direction to one lane in each direction; • Modification of Calle Tampico between Eisenhower Drive and Desert Club Drive from two lanes in each direction to one lane in each direction; • Modification of Calle Sinaloa between Eisenhower Drive and Avenida Bermudas from two lanes in each direction to one lane in each direction; • Construct a raised median at Washington Street/Avenida La Fonda to restrict the eastbound left -turn movement; • Back -in parking on Calle Tampico between Avenida Bermudas and Desert Club Drive; and • Mid -block crosswalks at four locations along Calle Tampico and one location at Calle Sinaloa/Avenida Villa. Properly designed modern roundabouts can reduce unnecessary traffic stops, traffic collisions, and vehicle speeds, while improving efficiency and overall multi -modal mobility. Final roundabout design considerations should include turning radius for large vehicles, approach deflection, bicycle/pedestrian accommodations, and right-of-way constraints. The proposed lane modifications would provide additional capacity for enhanced parkway facilities, on -street parking, and/or protected bicycle/NEV facilities. Additional circulation improvements La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-31 August 2016 633 ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION include mini roundabouts along Avenida Bermudas near Calle Estado and additional sidewalk infrastructure throughout the Village. As a whole, the Village Buildout Circulation Plan is likely to result in reduced vehicle speeds and provide the facilities necessary for a multi -modal and vibrant downtown environment within the Village. Exhibit 3-9, Multi -Modal Street Improvements (Example), shows an example of some of the possible features that could be implemented as a result of the proposed Village Buildout Circulation Plan (source: walklive.org). • Other improvements that are proposed to increase pedestrian safety and access are as follows: o Install a pedestrian activated flashing light crosswalk on Calle Sinaloa at Avenida Villa o Install new sidewalks where needed o Install a third left turn lane from eastbound Avenue 52 and northbound Washington Street o Install a "worm" median at the intersection of Avenida La Fonda at Washington Street to facilitate right -turn only at this intersection o Provide additional bike lanes that can accommodate bicycles and golf carts Parking Demand Management The City of La Quinta approved the Village District Parking Study in 2006 that identified short-term and long-term strategies to improve parking in the Village. The Parking Study identified 2,919 parking spaces within the study area, with 2,417 spaces in off- street parking lots, and the remaining 502 space located on the streets within the Village. Residential parking was not counted toward the total. Since 2006, a number of new projects have been developed in the Village Build -out Plan project area. These projects added an additional 386 off-street parking spaces, increasing the total number of spaces in parking lots to 2,803. Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will allow the continued development of the Village with a mix of residential, retail, commercial office and professional office uses to create an urban environment at a human scale so that people feel comfortable walking or riding a bicycle to and around the Village. Future residential development projects will be required to provide adequate parking for units built. However, for the other uses, the mixed use concept provides efficiencies of land use whereby people will likely visit one or more restaurants, shops or offices during a trip to the Village, resulting in a lower demand for parking than what is generally required for individual land uses. And, because the Build -out Plan includes both residential and non-residential uses, local residents would not have to drive to shop or obtain commercial or professional services. Table 3-4, Implementation Process for Parking Management Strategies, shows the approximate timeline for La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-32 August 2016 634 ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION implementing the proposed Parking Management Strategies. Parking Management Strategies being considered by the City for adoption in the Village are as follows: Parking Management Strategies PM1. Educational Programs - Educate businesses on ways to incentivize carpooling, public transportation, walking, and bicycling as a mode of transportation for employees. - Educate the public about the operations and benefits of various parking strategies as these are implemented within the study area. PM2. Static Parking Information - Continue static event -based signage during events such as the La Quinta Arts Festival, the Old Town Car Show, and other events in the La Quinta Village. - Enhance parking lot signage and branding of public parking lots. - Work with private property owners to allow public parking when businesses are closed. - Consider regulating signage on private parking facilities. PM3. Shared Parking - Condition new developments so they accommodate shared parking. PM4. Spillover and Overflow Parking Management - Conduct periodic parking occupancy studies in peak periods to determine and monitor the prevalence of shoppers and employers parking in residential areas, as well as maximum occupancy of current public areas. - Consider instituting resident -only parking programs as appropriate in areas where spillover and overflow parking becomes common. Programs will be based on community dialogue and pricing options. - Consider a pilot program for participation in an on -street parking program, in which residents may park for free, shoppers and employees pay to park, and revenue is used for neighborhood improvements. PM5. Transit/Shuttle - Create a transit/shuttle program similar to the programs used at El Paseo or in Downtown Palm Springs. Identify peak periods of parking to allow for shuttling shoppers and employees to and from Village. This will provide for more convenient access and service available to parking located furthest away from the center of the La Quinta Village, primarily focused on Zones 1 and 5. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-33 August 2016 635 ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PM6. Walkability to Improve Parking Utilization - Establish a system of walking routes specialized towards a topic such as historic sites like the La Quinta Museum, arts like the Old Town Artisan Studio, or health -oriented walking loops. PM7. Class 3 Bikeway to Improve Parking Utilization - Consider construction of a Class 3 Bikeway (Shared Lane) within the heart of Village and following through walkability improvements for greater promotion of a healthy -living lifestyle, tourism, and alleviation in overflow parking. Confirmation of this recommendation would require engineering studies to determine the feasibility and costs of this strategy. PZ1. Parking Conditions - Condition new developments, major remodels, and CUPS to include applicable parking management strategies. PZ2. Parking Time Limits and Regulations - Create parking time limits and regulations under a pricing system and determine whether modifications are required to time limits for special events and in -season activities. PZ3. Business Improvement District - Determine if the business community is interested in a Business Improvement District, to create an assessment formula with revenue generated and reinvested into parking, and access management programs to benefit the Village area. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-34 August 2016 ATTACH M ENT 1 V `: {{qq �►; - _� Y'•', Legend jr] I I= Y zr 4t ound®Doan t-2 Dnam ?. 1 .. #1 �v*E E l BM _ S W k r � � �� r �"'t � •� ., � „t iL� a Abn" i'./i✓f� Badmaarkmg I 5 `A— ��}j Pedestrian Cro65in7 II �y�,. . 4 SIT h - [y�l ` � I, _} ny`T �..: r 44 -me r ..� _.� a �Y End r iCsfla Nnlpal w r .. h s. 1 �` a�'- ,� - - � 'may s• _ �� s q NV r x:,`t Y ►s .re.� s � .�. �d t'-.f �� . :" , • + �..% s .. ��_ � r -l.,.t � �' VE l... rfia 16 ,r Source: Kunzman Associates, 2016 El 105 The Altum Group Village Build -Out Circulation Plan La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 3-8 37 ATTACH M ENT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-36 August 2016 638 Source: Kunzman Associates, 2016 E115 The Altum Group Example of Multi -Modal Street La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 39 3-9 ATTACH M ENT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-38 August 2016 640 ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Table 3-4 Implementation Process for Parking Management Strategies Entity Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Years 4& 5 • Continue static event -based • Enhance branding for lots and signage (PM2) regulate signage (PM2) . Pilot program for shuttle . Conduct parking occupancy • Implement • Implement City service (PM5) study to review progress (P4) M Walkability Routes Walkability Routes • Condition new developments . Implement Walkability Routes (PM6) (PM6) so they accommodate shared (PM6) parking. (PM3) � Class 3 Bikeway implemented (PM7) • Partner with City on designing • Implement • Implement City & Business education programs for . Implement Education Program Education Education Community community (PM1) (pM1) Program (PM1) Program (PM1) City & Parking . Partner with City on shared . Condition new developments Operators / parking explorations (PM3) so they accommodate shared Designated Staff g parking. (PM3) • Implement • Participate with City in Walkability Routes , Implement monitoring programs (PM4) (PM6) Walkability Routes City & Residential . Establish Walkability Routes (PM6) Community (PM6) La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-39 August 2016 641 ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Build -Out Schedule The City's planning effort is focused on streamlining the regulatory process and facilitating a broad range of uses; developing a build -out scenario that addresses maximum potential commercial square footage and residential units; developing a network of public spaces and pedestrian, bike, and golf cart routes throughout the project area; and assuring that infrastructure is planned to accommodate build -out. The street grid is in place, and no major changes are anticipated. The City's General Plan was adopted in 2013 and focused on the next 20+ years, through 2035. To evaluate the potential environmental effects of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan, the assumption for build -out is that development of vacant parcels and the redevelopment of existing non-residential properties would occur between 2017 and 2035 for a total of 18 years. It is the City's intent to allow the Village area to continue to develop through market forces including demand for additional housing, commercial uses, and professional office space. For example, the Villas at Old Town, a mixed -use project, consists of 20,000 square feet of ground floor retail space, underground parking, and 84 condominiums above, to be built in two phases on an approximately 3.5- acre site at the southeast corner of Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive. This project is included in the build -out calculations shown in Table 3-3. 3.4 Other Public Agencies Development in the City of La Quinta requires a number of City -issued permits and approvals as development projects are proposed. The proposed Village Build -out Plan will require the following approvals: • Approval of the Build -out Plan • Approval of Zoning Code Text Changes • Certification of the Environmental Impact Report Subsequent projects proposed in the Village may require one or more of the following approvals: • Site Development Permit (Architectural and Site Plan Review) • Conditional Use Permit In addition, agencies that may require permits are listed in Table 3-5, Permitting Agencies: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-40 August 2016 642 ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Table 3-5 Permitting Agencies Agency Permit/Approval Required Federal None State State Water Resources Control Board Construction Stormwater General Permit; Notice of Intent to Comply with Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP); Issue Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) Regional South Coast Air Quality Management PM-10 Plan for compliance with Rule 403.1; Dust Control in District the Coachella Valley. Coachella Valley Association of Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Governments (CVAG) (CVMSHCP) (Payment of fees); Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) Permits to discharge into the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. 3.5 Cumulative Projects to be Evaluated with the Proposed Project State CEQA Guidelines Section 15355 defines cumulative impacts as follows: "Cumulative impacts refers to two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts. (a) The individual effects may be changes resulting from a single project or a number of separate projects. (b) The cumulative impact from several projects is the change in the environment which results from the incremental impact of the project when added to other closely related past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant projects taking place over a period of time." State CEQA Guidelines Section 15130 requires that an EIR discuss the cumulative impacts of a project when the project's incremental effect is cumulatively considerable. For the purposes of this EIR, "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15065(a)(3)). In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(b): "The discussion of cumulative impacts shall reflect the severity of the impacts and their likelihood of occurrence, the discussion need not provide as great a level of detail as is provided for the effects attributable to the project alone." It then goes on to say: " The discussion should be guided by standards of practicality and reasonableness, and should La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-41 August 2016 643 ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION focus on the cumulative impact to which identified other projects contribute rather than the attributes of other projects that do not contribute to the cumulative impact." In identifying projects that may contribute to cumulative impacts, the State CEQA Guidelines allow one of two options: 1. The "list approach"- a list of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, producing related or cumulative impacts, including those that are outside the control of the lead agency; or 2. The "summary of projections" method - a summary of projections contained in an adopted General Plan or related planning document, which is designed to evaluate regional or area -wide conditions. The first method is being employed in the evaluation of the proposed Build -out Plan because, although the project area is located near the center of the City, the Village is the central gathering place and it is likely that most City residents and visitors would come to shop, socialize, or work. Therefore, a City- wide cumulative project summary report showing currently approved, under construction, and pending developments was provided by City staff. The cumulative project list was generated for the Traffic Impact Analysis, and represents recently approved projects, projects under construction, and projects that are currently going through the entitlement process. Table 3-6, List of Cumulative Projects, provides a description of cumulative projects, while Exhibit 3-10, Cumulative Project Locations, shows the spatial relationships between the cumulative projects identified in Table 3-6 and the Village Build -out Plan project area. The ID numbers associated with the other development projects are taken from a larger list of pending or recently approved projects throughout the City of La Quinta. The complete City-wide Cumulative Project Summary Report Projects Approved/Under Construction/Pending Residential Projects Approved and/or Under Construction (Permit data current to 811115), is included in Appendix C of the General Plan Draft EIR. Those projects listed in Table 3-7 and shown on Exhibit 3-10, represent only those projects that were considered to be related in proximity to the project area, and thus when combined with future projects in the project area have the potential to cause a cumulatively significant impact. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-42 August 2016 644 _ _ Mllve ns Yllr{r Mates Ave Pebb/e Beach W Iraquais l F Ieno. li 0 Park 1Weatueard Ha. Gr'.. Cam❑fry 31ut j EIr r_a�aa nls 1V Irjh s:hwar + 4 a ��y s r w Avenue d5 Ind,, I qr `d 7 Ica I]eerY ar AN Sea F40rance P: �r7rtl Agee .; �— AvenuC43" — — __ -_ -Amnue 4l8 +� Ranch4d �_,:untrr -lus �u��rlrtwer pr ., v � � m Raewuu `r' 491h Ave a w _ n chid _--rr lute 3 rluntn CL.r!• n — Avenida Fernanuo 4` rQrE gap g AfWUD"'t4atte AvenueSa esa C7a 50th Ave a via o . a Maildarina u Porgt;ingl a _ lul eat i.r.m,nr •, r n!;•::: ,r.. Sisl Ave TQ7 o J� .�lyi, CalleSinxlas z� � � �"�� C ai le Durango G 3flu"nrx- �v Ge 52 _. a i_-. y_ =; S2ndAve M Celle Son .,= .7nn r CinII Catty tie ldjw a n }, `NW IAIw N W- E S Source: Kunzman Associates, 2016 E115 The Altum Group Cumulative Development Projects La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Legend 0 _Other Development ID (see Table 4.5, Cumulative Development Projects) Exhibit 453-10 ATTACH M ENT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-44 August 2016 646 ATTACH M ENT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Table 3-6 List of Cumulative Projects Other Development ID Project Name Land Use Quantity' UnitS2 1 TR 29894 - Hideaway Single -Family Detached 218 DU 8 TR 30138 - Diamonte Single -Family Detached 47 DU SP 2003-069 - 10 Watermarke Single -Family Detached 82 DU 11 SP 2003-070 - Codorniz Townhomes 58 DU TR 31348 - Estates at 14 Point Happy Single -Family Detached 32 DU 19 TT 32397 - Canyon Ridge Single -Family Detached 74 DU 22 TR 31852 - Polo Estates Single -Family Detached 14 DU 23 TT 33085 - Core Homes Single -Family Detached 7 DU 29 TT 34038 - Casa LQ Condominiums 20 DU TR 28409 - Flores de 30 Montanas Single -Family Detached 9 DU 34 Tradition Club Single -Family Detached 89 DU 42 TR 32571 - Dorado Single -Family Detached 15 DU 43 TT 36279 - Orchards Single -Family Detached 11 DU 50 Washington 50 Gas Station/ C. Store & Car Wash 20 FP Pass -By (62% AM, 56% PM) Fast -Food Restaurant w/ Drive Thru 6,000 SF Pass -By (49% AM, 50% PM) Office 18,000 SF Shopping Center 18,000 SF Pass -By (34% PM) Subtotal DU 676 Subtotal SF 42,000 52 Villas at Old Town Condominiums 84 DU Retail 20,000 SF Subtotal DU 84 Subtotal SF 20,000 53 Silver Rock Resort Golf Course 18 Holes Hotel 435 RM Conference Center 71,000 SF Subtotal SF 71,000 54 Shopping Center Shopping Center 100,000 SF Pass -By (34% PM) Subtotal SF 100,000 55 La Paloma Assisted Living Congregate Care 236 DU Assisted Living 38 Beds Subtotal 57 Washington Park Shopping Center 109,650 SF La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-45 August 2016 647 ATTACH M ENT 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Table 3-6 List of Cumulative Projects (Continued) Other Development ID Project Name Land Use Quantityl Units2 58 Centerpointe Office 117,900 SF High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant 6,000 SF Pass -By (43% PM) Subtotal DU 236 Subtotal SF 233,550 60 Pavilions Retail 0 SF 61 Centre at La Quinta Shopping Center 300,000 SF 62 111 La Quinta Centre Shopping Center 123,600 SF 63 Caleo Bay Park Shopping Center 17,595 SF 64 VUP 06-035 Retail 11,025 SF 65 Jefferson Plaza Shopping Center 10,900 SF 66 La Quinta Square Fast -Food Restaurant w/ Drive Thru Pass -By (49% AM, 50% PM) Supermarket Retail Subtotal SF 4,750 17,020 8,500 493,390 SF SF SF TOTAL DU 996 T0TALSF1 959,940 1 SF Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, 2012. Notes: 1. For approved projects, quantity shown reflects unconstructed development remaining. 2. DU = Dwelling Units; SF = Square Feet; RM = Rooms; FP = Fueling Positions La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 3-46 August 2016 648 ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Chapter 4 Environmental Setting This Section of the EIR presents the regional and local setting for the La Quinta Village, and sets the stage for the Environmental Impact Analysis provided in Chapter 5, Environmental Impact Analysis. The environmental setting is characterized for each of the environmental topics that will be evaluated in this EIR. 4.1 Aesthetics The City of La Quinta is located in the eastern Coachella Valley along the eastern slope of the Santa Rosa Mountains. The Santa Rosa Mountains are the southerly extension of the San Jacinto Mountains. The tallest mountain within this range is Mt. San Jacinto which forms the westerly end of the Coachella Valley. Mt. San Jacinto rises to an elevation of 10,804 feet and is the furthest north peak of the San Jacinto Mountains range. Due to the location of the Village near the Santa Rosa Mountains, Mt. San Jacinto is not visible from the Village. The Santa Rosa Mountains form a dramatic backdrop to the City's western boundary. Toro Peak is the tallest mountain in the Santa Rosa Mountains, rising to 8,717 feet. Closer, although much lower, are the foothills of the Santa Rosa Mountains, known as the Coral Mountains. The Coral Mountains are located within the La Quinta corporate boundary and rise about 1,000 feet above sea level. As their name implies, the Coral Mountains look like giant coral reefs springing up from the valley floor. The Cove area of the City, located to the south and west of the Village is situated within these mountains. The La Quinta Village area is located at the northeastern edge of the cove area and the Coral Mountains are located to the west of the Village area, making up the prime visual resource in the area. Other mountains providing a visual resource for La Quinta include the San Bernardino Mountains to the northwest, Little San Bernardino Mountains to the north, and the Indio Hills to the northeast and east, below the Little San Bernardinos. These mountains are further away and only visible from portions of the La Quinta Village area. The Village Build -out Plan will result in growth and development throughout the project area, which may cause impacts to existing aesthetic and visual resources, by partially blocking existing views of the Santa Rosa Mountains. A detailed analysis of visual impacts is addressed in Section 5.1, Aesthetics. The La Quinta Village is characterized by one and two story commercial and professional office buildings, the Civic Center, Park and Library, a middle school, a resort/spa, an apartment complex with 251 units, and 33 single family residences interspersed with vacant lots. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-1 August 2016 649 ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 4.2 Agricultural Resources Agriculture has historically been a major economic sector in the eastern portion of the Coachella Valley, including La Quinta. Although most of the farms within the incorporated regions of La Quinta no longer exist, agriculture is still an economic factor east of the City. The Riverside County Important Farmland 2012 Map, developed by the California Department of Conservation, highlights areas within the Coachella Valley that are important agricultural producing lands. Prime Farmland includes areas with both good physical and chemical attributes able to sustain long-term agriculture production. Unique Farmland areas produce crops of statewide importance; however contain lower quality soils than those within Prime Farmland. Farmland of Local Importance are lands generally without irrigation, and which produce dry crops that may be important locally, but are not important for statewide agriculture production. Southeast of the La Quinta Village, a portion of incorporated La Quinta, and land within the General Plan Sphere of Influence, contain lands listed as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, and Farmland of Local Importance. In total, there are approximately 9,100 acres of such lands within the City limits and Sphere. The La Quinta Village is within an area of urban and built up land. Implementation of the Build -out Plan would not impact any Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or farmland of Statewide Importance. Chapter 6, Other CEQA Sections, summarizes the analysis that led to the finding of no impact on agricultural resources. 4.3 Air Quality Air quality in a given location is influenced by the type and concentration of pollutants emitted locally and regionally. The Coachella Valley, including the City of La Quinta, is located within the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB). The SSAB shares a boundary with the San Diego Air Basin to the west, the South Coast Air Basin to the northwest, and the Mojave Desert Air Basin to the north. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is responsible for establishing the criteria by which air quality is measured in the Coachella Valley. In the Coachella Valley, air quality has deteriorated over the last few decades due to local growth, increased development, industry and construction activities both locally and regionally. While local emissions of pollutants affect air quality in the Coachella Valley, some of the air quality degradation can be attributed to sources outside of the SSAB, particularly from within the South Coast Air Basin, located west of the region. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-2 August 2016 650 ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Of all the criteria pollutants, ozone and suspended particulates (PM10 and PM2.5) are the most prevalent in the Coachella Valley; other pollutants are not believed to constitute significant threats to public health. Ozone and PM10 concentrations are recorded at monitoring stations on Jackson Street in Indio and the Palm Springs International Airport. Data collected at local monitoring stations show a downward trend in the amount of days over ozone and PM10 thresholds, however the SSAB continues to be classified as a "serious" ozone non -attainment area. The 2007 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) was prepared to satisfy the State Implementation Plan (SIP) requirements of the Clean Air Act, due to non -attainment status. In regards to PM10 levels, the region has also historically been designated as a serious non -attainment area for PM1o, however due to new monitoring techniques that discount strong wind events, the SCAQMD has worked on re - designating the area from non -attainment to attainment for PMlo. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) approved SCAQMD's PMlo Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan in February 2010. This Plan details a strategy of how the Coachella Valley will proceed with improvement of its status from serious non -attainment to attainment in accordance with PM10 National Ambient Air Quality Standard. Climate La Quinta is located in a subtropical desert characterized by hot dry summers and cool dry winters. The City's climate is a direct result of the local geography and topography of the region. La Quinta is located in the low-lying Coachella Valley on the eastern side of the San Jacinto and San Bernardino Mountains. These mountains form a barrier between the coastal region to the west, which is more moist, and the dry desert regions to the east and southeast. The mountains create a rain shadow effect on the Coachella Valley and reduce the amount of precipitation the Valley receives from winter storms that originate over the Pacific Ocean. Although the region remains dry most days of the year, the Valley does experience periodic rainfall from strong winter storms and summer monsoon thunderstorms. The City of La Quinta experiences a dry subtropical desert climate. According to the Western Regional Climate Center, which measures average temperature and rainfall at the nearby Indio Fire Station, the average annual maximum temperature for the local area is 88.9° degrees, and average annual minimum temperature is 58.0° degrees. The region is characterized by summers with temperatures reaching well over 100' degrees during the day and staying above 70' degrees at night. July is the warmest month in La Quinta, with average maximum temperatures reaching 107' degrees. January is the coolest month, with average maximum temperatures reaching 70.6° degrees. The coolest average minimum temperature also occurs in January, and reaches 39.1° degrees. The surrounding mountain temperatures are cooler than those on the valley floor, and typically experience a 5° degree Fahrenheit drop per 1,000-foot increase in elevation. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-3 August 2016 651 ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING La Quinta experiences periodic rainfall events primarily during the winter and summer seasons. The average annual rainfall is 3.31 inches per year. During the winter months, La Quinta receives an average of 2.01 inches of rainfall, with January typically being the wettest month. Winter rains are a result of low-pressure systems dropping south from the Gulf of Alaska and into Southern California. During El Nino years, the region can experience extended days of strong winter storms. Summer rainfall in the Valley occurs as a result of the monsoon season, which extends from July through September when moist southeasterly winds draw moisture into the region from the Gulf of California and Mexico. La Quinta averages 0.70 inches of rainfall during the summer, with September averaging the most summer precipitation of 0.30 inches. Summer monsoon storms tend to be localized thunderstorm events that can drop heavy rainfall over short periods of time. 4.4 Biological Resources La Quinta is located within the Colorado Desert Sub -unit of the Sonoran Desert. The desert climate limits the types of vegetation that can be supported, and native vegetation is typically sparse. In higher elevations conditions are less extreme, with milder temperatures and higher annual rainfalls, which support a wider variety of plant and animal life. Within the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan area, naturally occurring habitat has largely disappeared as a result of urban development. Vegetation in the City primarily takes the form of non-native landscape materials. However, native habitat is present on the slopes of the Santa Rosa Mountains adjacent to the project area. In these areas, development potential has been limited by topography and restrictions on land use applied by local jurisdictions, including the City and County, through the application of Open Space land use designations, the City's Hillside Overlay zoning district, as well as through the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). The La Quinta Village is within the boundaries of the CVMSHCP, a regional planning effort that addresses the conservation of 27 species and 24 vegetation communities on more than 1.2 million acres in the Coachella Valley. The CVMSHCP has identified conservation areas throughout the Coachella Valley. In La Quinta, these are limited to lands in the Santa Rosa Mountains and its foothills, and are designated as Natural Open Space. Development on lands outside conservation areas is subject to payment of mitigation fees through the CVMSHCP. The CVMSHCP is further discussed in Section 5.3, Biological Resources. Native vegetation in the City is most common within foothills, drainages and streams within and near to the mountains. The most common native plant community in the City and Sphere is Sonoran Creosote Bush Scrub, dominated by Creosote Bush, Burrobush, Brittlebush and similar common species. Other native plant communities include Sonoran Mixed Woody and Succulent Scrub, and Desert Dry Wash Woodland. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-4 August 2016 652 ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING In the Village vacant lots are generally sparsely vegetated by invasive species (weeds) with an occasional native shrub. Most of these lots have been previously graded or otherwise disturbed by human activities. Common Wildlife Species There are a variety of common wildlife species in the City, which are supported by disturbed sand fields, saltbush scrub, agricultural and urban landscaping. Common species also occur in habitats on the southern and eastern edges of the City and Sphere, which have been less disturbed. The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area is already highly disturbed, and thus does not provide habitat for most wildlife species. Common insect species in the General Plan Planning Area include Harvester Ants, Creosote Bush Grasshopper and Black Widow Spider. Common amphibians include California Toad and Pacific Tree Frog. Common reptiles include Zebra -tailed Lizard, Desert Horned Lizard, California Kingsnake and Colorado Desert Sidewinder. A variety of birds are found in La Quinta. These include the House Finch and House Sparrow, Albert's Towhee, Mourning Dive and Red-tailed Hawk. Common mammals include bats, the Black -tailed Jackrabbit, Pocket Mouse and California Ground Squirrel. However, because the project area is an urban environment most of these species would not be expected to occur. Sensitive Species Special status species are those that are considered threatened or endangered under the California or federal Endangered Species Act. Several special status species are known to occur in the City, most notably the Coachella Valley Fringe -Toed Lizard, Burrowing Owl, and Peninsular Bighorn Sheep. In addition to these species, habitat has been modeled for Coachella Valley Milkvetch, Desert Tortoise and Palm Springs Pocket Mouse, although these species have not been observed in the City. The project area does not include any mapped habitat for sensitive species. A complete discussion of sensitive species that could occur in the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area is included in Section 5.3, Biological Resources. 4.5 Cultural Resources Cultural Resources within the larger La Quinta General Plan Planning Area include paleontological remnants, artifacts from prehistoric cultures and more recent cultures, and culturally important buildings and structures. During the late Miocene and early Pliocene era, or approximately 5 million years ago, the Salton Trough was an extension of the Gulf of California. Fossils from this time period have been found in sediment in the northern portion of the Coachella Valley, including the Painted Hills, Garnet Hill, and La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-5 August 2016 653 ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING two places in the Indio Hills. In more recent time, repeated inundation of ancient Lake Cahuilla has resulted in the identification of fossils of snails and mollusks in the City. Early human settlement occurred throughout California approximately 8,000 to 12,000 years ago, during the beginning of the Holocene period. Native Americans occupied lands throughout the Coachella Valley during these ancient times. Historical records show that early Native American peoples in the Coachella Valley were from the Takic speaking Cahuilla tribe. Among this tribe were separate groups including the Pass Cahuilla, who occupied the modern day San Gorgonio Pass and Palm Springs area, the Mountain Cahuilla, who occupied the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains, and the Desert Cahuilla, who occupied the eastern Coachella Valley, which includes modern day La Quinta. The first noted European explorations in the Coachella Valley occurred in 1823-1825 when Spanish explorers Jose Romero, Jose Maria Estudillo and Romualdo Pacheco led expeditions to find a route to current day Yuma, Arizona. These explorers traveled through the Coachella Valley on what was known as the Cocomaricopa Trail, which was an ancient Indian trading route. By the 1860's, other European explorers, including William David Bradshaw, began traveling along the Cocomaricopa Trail and renamed it the Bradshaw Trail. Throughout the late 1800's, the Bradshaw Trail was a commonly utilized route, until the completion of the Southern Pacific Railroad in 1876. By the 1870's non-native settlements began to occur across the Coachella Valley, as new federal laws, including the Homestead Act and Desert Land Act, opened lands for new settlers. The discovery of underground water sources began to increase farming activities throughout the Valley in the early 20th century. By 1910, the date palm industry began to flourish in the region. Tourism reached La Quinta and the Coachella Valley in the 1920's, as the rich and famous of Hollywood began coming to the Valley to enjoy the beautiful scenery and climate. The La Quinta Resort was developed in 1926 and became a focus of the local economy. The entire Coachella Valley began to boom after World War II, as more residents and visitors came to the area in pursuit of desert living and to enjoy newly developed golf facilities. Today, La Quinta continues to experience new growth and development based on this tradition. The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan will facilitate future growth in the project area and new development projects may impact existing historical buildings within the Village. New development has the potential to impact buried cultural resources that may become unearthed due to grading activities. Section 5.4, Cultural Resources, addresses the potential impacts that may be associated with cultural resources within the La Quinta Village. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-6 August 2016 654 ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 4.6 Geology Soils in the City are generally Holocene -age soils, comprised of alluvial, or waterborne sand and gravel, lacustrine (lake) sediments, and Aeolian (windborne) sandy soils in the valley portion of La Quinta. Older, harder, crystalline rock that occurs in the mountains weathers and forms boulders or further erodes. The latter creates fine particles that are carried along canyons and drainages downslope, and are deposited as alluvial fans at the base of mountain slopes. La Quinta, like most of the eastern Coachella Valley, was inundated by ancient Lake Cahuilla as recently as 400 years ago. Lacustrine deposits may be up to 300 feet thick, and may form clay soils in the valley areas where these soils alternate in layers with alluvial fan sediments and rock debris from the adjacent mountains. There are eleven primary soil series that have been mapped as occurring in the General Plan Planning Area. Five of the eleven soils occur in the La Quinta Village project area; and are all formed in alluvium: Coachella fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (CpA), Gilman fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (GbA), Indio fine sandy loam (Ip), Indio very fine sandy loam (Is), and Myoma fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (MaB). Much of the valley, including the La Quinta Village area, is subject to high winds, which lift soils from alluvial fans along the base of mountain slopes and canyons and other areas where loose, sandy soils occur. These sediments are carried along the central axis of the valley, generally from the northwest to southeast, creating a condition known as "blowsand". Because the Village Build -out Plan project area is mostly developed with urban uses, blowsand is less of an issue. However, because blowsand is a regional issue it is further discussed in Section 5.5, Soils/Geology, and in Section 5.2, Air Quality. Major Faults Affecting The Build -out Plan Area Earthquakes can result in impacts ranging from significant property damage to the loss of public services and facilities and the loss of life. The most severe impacts in the La Quinta area would be expected to result from strong ground shaking associated with earthquakes. Earthquakes and associated groundshaking can also generate other impacts, such as landslides, damage or destruction to structures, liquefaction, and settlement. Fires, hazardous materials releases, disruption of essential facilities and services such as water, sewer, gas, electric, drainage, and transportation can also occur. Flooding may happen when dam or water tanks fail as a result of ground shaking. The most significant faults with potential to affect the City and the project area are listed here. • San Andreas Fault Zone: The San Andreas fault passes approximately 7.5 miles northeast of the Village Build -out Plan project area. The 2007 Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP) estimated that the southern San Andreas fault has a 59 percent La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-7 August 2016 655 ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING probability of causing an earthquake of at least magnitude 6.7 (Richter scale) in the next 30 years. • San Jacinto Fault Zone: The San Jacinto fault zone is located approximately 16 miles south of the La Quinta Village. WGCEP estimates there is an average 31 percent probability of all the segments of the San Jacinto fault rupturing between 1994 and 2024. • Burnt Mountain Fault: this fault is approximately 13 miles long and is approximately 15 miles north of the City at its closest point. Geologic mapping indicates It is considered capable of producing a magnitude 6.0 to 6.5 earthquake. • Eureka Peak Fault: The Eureka Peak Fault is approximately 12.5 to 15 miles long and is a right - lateral strike -slip fault. The Eureka Peak fault is considered capable of generating earthquakes of between Mw 5.5 and 6.8. • Pinto Mountain Fault: This fault occurs north-northwest of the City at the boundary of the north side of the Little San Bernardino Mountains near the town of Yucca Valley. Seismically Induced Geotechnical Hazards • Seismically Induced Ground Shaking: Seismically induced ground shaking is the most potentially significant geotechnical hazard to the Village Build -out Plan project area, due to the active faults in close proximity to the City. • Liquefaction: Liquefaction occurs when ground shaking of relatively long duration) causes soil to take on the qualities of a liquid or a semi ---viscous substance. The Village Build -out Plan project area contains areas of loose, unconsolidated soils, which can be susceptible to seismically- induced liquefaction. • Ground Failure from Compressible Soils: Unconsolidated soils may compress under the weight of fill embankments and structures. These soils often include recently deposited alluvium, which occurs in the Village Build -out Plan project area. • Ground Failure from Collapsible Soils: Recently accumulated soils in arid or semi -arid environments may be subject to soil collapse, or hydroconsolidation. If partly supported by clay or silt, they become rearranged and lose cohesion when inundated. The Build -out Plan project area is mostly consists of fine sandy soils that are not likely to collapse. Subsidence: Ground subsidence occurs when the ground surface gradually sinks or settles, with no horizontal movement. When groundwater extraction surpasses supplies, a condition known as overdraft, a loss of aquifer storage capacity can occur and create subsidence. This condition exists throughout the Coachella Valley. The Village Build -out Plan is within the area being monitored for subsidence by USGS, but it is southwest of the La Quinta subsidence area that has experienced substantial subsidence in recent years. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-8 August 2016 656 ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING • Wind Erosion: Much of the Coachella Valley, including the project area, is susceptible to wind and wind-blown sand hazards. A Variety of health problems are associated with wind and blowing sand, such as skin disorders, allergies and respiratory irritation, and eye infection. Topography The Coachella Valley and the City of La Quinta are located in a region that is subject to complex and dynamic geologic forces that have, and continue to shape its dramatically varied topography. The area is situated at the margin of the Colorado Desert and Peninsular Range physiographic provinces. Each province comprises a distinct geologic and climatic region that has resulted in diverse and unique landscapes. The Colorado Desert province, which encompasses the valley floor portion of the City, is part of a low-lying basin extending from the Banning Pass to the border with Mexico. To the southwest, the Santa Rosa Mountains are within the Peninsular Ranges province. Development opportunities and constraints are dictated by the area's topography, with development generally limited to the valley floor. Elevations in the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area range from approximately 39 feet above mean sea level at the eastern boundary, to approximately 57 feet above mean sea level at the western boundary. 4.7 Global Climate Change/Greenhouse Gases Constituent gases of the Earth's atmosphere, called atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHG), play a critical role in the Earth's radiant heat levels by trapping infrared radiation emitted from the Earth's surface, which otherwise would have escaped to space. Prominent greenhouse gases contributing to this process include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone, water vapor, nitrous oxide (N20), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). This phenomenon, known as the Greenhouse Effect, is responsible for maintaining a habitable climate. Anthropogenic (caused or produced by humans) emissions of these greenhouse gases in excess of natural ambient concentrations are responsible for the enhancement of the Greenhouse Effect and have led to a trend of unnatural warming of the Earth's natural climate, known as global warming or climate change. Emissions of gases that induce global warming are attributable to human activities associated with industrial/manufacturing, agriculture, utilities, transportation, and residential land uses. Transportation is responsible for 41 percent of the State's greenhouse gas emissions, followed by electricity generation. Emissions of COz and nitrogen oxides (NOX) are byproducts of fossil fuel combustion. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, results from off -gassing associated with agricultural practices and landfills. State legislation, including the Global Warming Solutions Act (AB32), calls for a reduction in greenhouse gases to 1990 levels by 2020, representing a 30 percent reduction State wide. As part of its local implementation of AB32, La Quinta has developed a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan, La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-9 August 2016 657 ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING with the intent to reduce CO2e emissions in compliance with State mandates. The Plan includes a comprehensive inventory of greenhouse gas emissions generated Citywide, including those generated by local government activities. Future emissions of greenhouse gases are projected, reduction targets set, and policies and programs are proposed to provide the City with tools to meet State requirements. 4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials The City of La Quinta is predominantly a residential community with scattered commercial centers and limited quasi -industrial areas. There are no heavy industrial facilities in the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area which could generate large quantities of hazardous waste; however, smaller -scale hazardous/toxic material generators exist throughout the City. These include dry cleaning businesses, auto repair shops, gas stations, medical facilities, and pest control companies, which are mainly situated along the Highway 111 corridor. Additionally, many of the large agricultural production areas to the east, and golf courses found throughout the City, use and store pesticides and fertilizers that can be harmful to human health. According to the Department of Toxic Substances Control, there are no hazardous waste sites in La Quinta listed under Government Code 65962.5. The closest site listed is the Forest -Gardner site, which is a fertilizer and pesticide manufacturing plant located in the City of Coachella. There are also numerous transportation corridors running throughout the City and surrounding area, including Highway 111, Interstate 10, State Highways 86, and the Southern Pacific Railroad. The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area is not located close to any of these corridors. The closest corridor is Highway 111, running east -to -west approximately 2.5 miles north of the Build -out Plan project area. These routes are used for transporting hazardous materials. The transporting of hazardous materials along these corridors presents risks associated with the accidental release, spill, or exposure of hazardous materials on existing and future populations. The City of La Quinta adopted the Multi -Hazard Functional Plan in 1996 that addresses the planned response to natural and man-made emergencies, including the release or spill of hazardous materials. Section 5.6, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, will further discuss the impacts and precautions associated with hazardous materials. 4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality Although the climate in the Coachella Valley is generally characterized by mild winters and hot, dry summers, seasonal storms can produce significant amounts of precipitation within short periods of time. Winter storms are responsible for much of the area's annual rainfall, and usually occur between November and April. However, the region and surrounding mountains may also experience localized La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-10 August 2016 658 ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING thunderstorms at other times, especially during the summer monsoon season. Rapid snowmelt from the mountains may also result in flooding downslope of the Santa Rosa Mountains in the City of La Quinta. The City is subject to flash flooding along natural or man-made channels and sheet flooding across the valley floor. Although of short duration, flash floods result in high peak water volumes and velocities, which are frequently intensified by features of the local natural and built environment. Runoff flows frequently carry considerable debris such as mud, sand and rock fragments, which may clog natural or built channels and restrict flow. When channels are impeded by debris or structures, or when flows exceed channel capacity, sheet flow occurs, with water overflowing channel banks. Increased development also diminishes the area available for natural infiltration, replacing permeable soils with buildings, sidewalks, parking lots, and roadways. Based on mapping prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the entire Village Build -out Plan project area is outside the 100 year flood zone, but within the 500-year flood zone. In perspective, the nearest 100-year flood zone is the existing Oleander Reservoir at approximately 200 feet northwest of Eisenhower Drive and Calle Tampico. Responsibility for analysis and design of regional flood control structures lies with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD). The Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) manages regional facilities, which collect runoff from areas outside the City, including the mountains. CVWD has broad responsibility for planning, maintenance and construction of regional facilities' improvements. Regional facilities within the City include the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel (Whitewater River), the La Quinta Evacuation Channel, the Bear Creek System, the East La Quinta Channel and Lake Cahuilla. Maintenance of local facilities, which collect runoff from local streets and properties to regional channels and basins, is the responsibility of the City of La Quinta. The City's Master Drainage Plan, updated in 2009, describes local facilities, which include storm drains, culverts and catch basins within private development and local streets. Issues related to flooding and hydrology, including a more detailed description of regional and local flood control facilities, are discussed in Section 5.8, Hydrology and Water Quality. Domestic Water Resources CVWD provides domestic and irrigation water to the City and its Sphere. CVWD uses wells to extract groundwater, which naturally recharge from runoff from the mountains, as well as from CVWD groundwater recharge ponds located in the western Valley and south of the City in Martinez Canyon. The City and CVWD have implemented a number of conservation programs in recent years which have reduced consumption of domestic water. The City has also implemented water conservation La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-11 August 2016 659 ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING measures in landscaping maintenance. Chapter 8.13 of the Municipal Code, Water Efficient Landscaping, provides detailed requirements for water conservation in landscaping of new and existing projects. In addition, Building Code requirements provide for the use of water -efficient fixtures in new homes or businesses, or those which are undergoing major remodeling. These requirements extend to water features, fountains and lakes within projects, which can be a significant source of water loss, particularly due to the evaporation which occurs in the City's desert environment. Whitewater River Sub -basin The Coachella Valley is underlain by a substantial subsurface groundwater basin, or aquifer, in which groundwater has accumulated over millions of years, primarily from runoff from surrounding mountains. The aquifer is naturally subdivided by fault barriers into sub -basins, which are further divided into subareas. Most of the Coachella Valley, including the City of La Quinta, is underlain by the Whitewater River Sub -basin. It extends from Palm Springs to the Salton Sea, and is subdivided into a number of subareas. Water in the aquifer flows from the northwest to the southeast. The Lower Thermal subarea occurs under the City, and provides it with its primary source of domestic water. The subarea's water supply occurs at depths of 300 to 600 feet below the surface, and may extend to a depth of 1,000 feet. The Upper and Lower Thermal subareas together are estimated to contain 19.4 million acre-feet of water (1 acre-foot is equal to 325,851 gallons). Continued growth in the City and the region has resulted in an increased demand for domestic water. As a result, CVWD extracts more water from the Lower Thermal subarea than is naturally recharged into it every year — a condition known as overdraft. In April 2016, CVWD released the 201612017 Engineer's Report on Water Supply and Replenishment Assessment. The report concluded that the total outflow for the East Whitewater River Sub -basin in 2015 was 172,200 acre-feet (af), including total groundwater production, subsurface drainage outflow, and evapotranspiration. In 2015, total inflow for the East Whitewater River Sub -basin was 199,100 af, including natural inflow, non -consumptive return and water replenished by CVWD at replenishment facilities. The annual balance is the total inflow less the total outflow for a gain of 26,900 of of water in storage in the sub -basin in 2015. Water Quality The Coachella Valley has generally good to excellent water quality, except where water tables in the Sub -basin are perched or semi -perched and groundwater contains high concentrations of dissolved solids. During seasonal rain events, storm water which travels over built surfaces, such as parking lots and building rooftops, has the potential to be contaminated by oils, solvents, and chemicals. The City implements the requirements of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to assure that storm waters are protected from pollutants. Groundwater quality may also be affected La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-12 August 2016 ..f ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING by long-term discharge associated with septic systems. These impacts are not anticipated to impact the Village Build -Out Plan project area because all projects within the Build -out Plan project area will be required to connect to sewer facilities operated by CVWD. These issues are further discussed in Section 5.8, Hydrology and Water Quality. 4.10 Land Use and Planning La Quinta historically has been a resort community attracting visitors from all parts of the country. Recent growth, however, has focused on residential and retail development, providing both a permanent home for year-round residents, and a second home for seasonal residents. The City of La Quinta, and the Coachella Valley in general, are winter destinations for "snowbird" residents who move to the desert from northern regions to escape the cold. As a result, a large number of homes built throughout the City are considered second homes. The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Area is located at the north end of the Cove area, at the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains. The area is dominated by residential land use, including some of the oldest neighborhoods in the City, to the south of The Village area. The La Quinta Resort and Club is located northeast of The Village area and their Golf Courses abut the Build -out Plan boundaries in the northeast. Areas to the west and southwest are Medium/High Density Residential land use, making up the north end of The Cove. Medium/High Density Residential is also located to the north of the Village area, east of the La Quinta Resort. Low Density Residential is widespread to the east and southeast of the Build -out Plan area. Tradition Golf Club is designated Open Space - Recreation land use to the south, among low density residential development. The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area currently comprises an area that includes multiple land use designations. Commercial land use is located in the northeastern segment of the plan area and contains existing commercial development, although some of the buildings are vacant. Community Facilities are located throughout The Village. Open space in The Village is an existing park. The majority of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan area is designated Village Commercial. This designation supports mixed use development, creating a walkable neighborhood of medium -to -high density housing among commercial properties. Section 5.9, Land Use and Planning discusses the environmental impacts associated with the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan. 4.11 Noise Noise is measured using the decibel (dB) as a unit of measurement, which describes the amplitude or strength of sound. Most common sounds range from 40 dB to 100 dB. A normal conversation, for La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-13 August 2016 661 ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING example, usually measures around 60 dB at a distance of 3-feet. A jet engine, on the other hand, can measure up to 110 dB, which is considered very loud and discomforting. Within the built environment, noise is created from various sources, including traffic, construction equipment, machinery, and people. The combination of sounds created by these various sources is called the ambient noise level. Most municipalities analyze ambient noise levels to accurately measure the amount of noise affecting sensitive receptors, such as schools, residential units, or hospitals. Ambient noise is measured using Community Noise Equivalency Level (CNEL) units, which is a weighted average of the intensity of sounds over a 24-hour period. CNEL accounts for time of day and adds additional decibels during sensitive periods, such as between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. The CNEL weighted decibel unit is called dBA. The City of La Quinta has determined that a CNEL of less than 65 dBA of exterior noise is acceptable for sensitive receptors. The City of La Quinta currently has a Noise Ordinance and Noise Element that identifies excessive sound levels, which are detrimental to the public health, welfare and safety of residents. The Noise Ordinance and Noise Element establish exterior noise standards for various land uses, and appropriate time periods for construction and other types of noise. Future development in the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan area will continue to increase ambient noise levels. Section 5.10, Noise, addresses the existing and build out noise environment, and potential noise impacts associated with the implementation of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan. 4.12 Population and Housing The California Department of Finance 2015 E-5 Report accounted for a total of 24,150 dwelling units within the City of La Quinta, and an estimated population of 39,694. The total number of occupied dwelling units within the City was identified as 15,250. Thus, nearly 37 percent of all housing units within La Quinta were estimated to be unoccupied in 2015. The relatively high vacancy rate is largely due to seasonal, recreational, or occasional use homes, which account for 27.5 percent of all housing units. Although seasonal, recreational, and occasional residents generate a demand for services and utilize local infrastructure and utilities, they are not accounted for in La Quinta's permanent population. The 2015 population size of 39,294 and the 15,250 occupied dwelling units yield an average household size of 2.6. In order to estimate the full occupancy population for the City of La Quinta, the per -household population size of 2.6 was multiplied by the existing number of dwelling units (24,150). Thus, the full occupancy population size of La Quinta in 2015 was approximately 62,790 people. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-14 August 2016 MYJ ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Potential new development in the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan includes multi -family residential units. The potential impacts on Population and Housing are discussed in Section 5.11. 4.13 Public Services and Utilities The City of La Quinta is served by a range of public service and facilities, such as local and regional governmental services, special districts, public utilities, and associated services and facilities. The following identifies the various public services and utilities that are available within the City of La Quinta. Fire Protection Fire protection services within the City of La Quinta are provided by the Riverside County Fire Department through a contractual agreement with the City. There are a total of seven stations available to respond to calls within the General Plan Planning Area, all staffed by full-time, paid firefighters as well as volunteers. Current minimum staffing is 3 firefighters per front -roll fire engine. Of these three firefighters, 1 will be a "Company Officer" level supervisor. Additionally, at least one of the three will be Paramedic Licensed. There are three City -owned stations in the City of La Quinta. Four additional stations within the County Fire Department system are available for emergency response: one in Indian Wells, two in Indio, and a fourth at the Jacqueline Cochran Airport, east of the City. The County dispatches calls through its centralized Emergency Command Center, which determines the responding station(s) based on location and need. In 2010, stations averaged a response time of 3.9 minutes throughout the City. The County also uses its dispatch system to provide ambulance services through its service provider, American Medical Response (AMR). The nearest fire station to the Village is No. 32 located at 78-111 Avenue 52 at the southwest corner of Avenue 52 and Desert Club Drive. Police Protection The City contracts annually with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department for police services, as it has since its incorporation in 1982. Within City limits, the Department operates as the La Quinta Police Department, and utilizes dedicated facilities, equipment and personnel. The Sheriff's Department provides police protection throughout the City on a 24-hour basis. There are two Police Department offices in the City: the Civic Center Community Policing Office located at 78-495 Calle Tampico and the La Quinta Police Station, which is operated by the Riverside County Sheriff's Department, located at 86-625 Airport Boulevard. The City's 2015 contract with the Sheriff's Department provides for the equivalent of 51 sworn officers and 5 community service officers. Police Protection is further described in Section 5.14, Public Services. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-15 August 2016 663 ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Solid Waste Management Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, LLC (Burrtec), provides solid waste disposal through a franchise agreement with the City. Solid waste collected in La Quinta is transported to the Edom Hill Transfer Station to the west in the City of Cathedral City or to the Coachella Valley Transfer Station located at the closed Coachella Landfill north of the 1-10 freeway. From either of these facilities waste can be transported to one of three regional landfills in Riverside County: Lamb Canyon, Badlands or El Sobrante, each of which has remaining long-term capacity. Burrtec also has the ability to transfer solid waste to the newly expanded Salton City Landfill in Imperial County. Burrtec also provides green waste recycling with this material going to the Coachella Valley Compost Facility. The City is currently required to implement new and maintain ongoing waste and recycling programs and recycle at least 50 percent of its solid waste stream, and is meeting that goal. Special programs, including the collection and disposal of household hazardous waste, construction and demolition materials, and medical "sharps" (syringes and needles), as well as commercial recycling, are also administered by Burrtec. Domestic Water CVWD is the domestic and irrigation water provider in the City. It sources most of its water supplies from groundwater, which is extracted through a system of wells located throughout the region, including La Quinta. CVWD also imports water to recharge the aquifer, using recharge basins located near Palm Springs and south and east of the City, in Martinez Canyon. CVWD's water distribution system is generally located in public rights of way under existing streets. There are 10 existing or planned CVWD water storage tanks in the City and its Sphere. California Water Code requires that CVWD prepare and periodically update an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) to analyze its current and future water supply. The UWMP is intended to ensure that sufficient supplies are available to serve land uses within its management area. The current UWMP was updated by CVWD in 2010. CVWD anticipates approval of the 2015 UWMP in July 2016. Wastewater Services In addition to domestic water services, CVWD provides the City with wastewater collection and treatment facilities. Sewer collection facilities are available in most areas of the City and Sphere of Influence, although septic systems are still utilized in some areas, primarily in the Sphere. CVWD has a system of wastewater lines throughout local streets, as well as force mains within major roadways. There are two CVWD wastewater treatment plants serving the City. Water Reclamation Plant 7 (WRP- 7), serves the portion of the City north of Miles Avenue. Lands in the City and Sphere located south of Miles Avenue are served by the Mid -Valley Water Reclamation Plant. WRP-7 has the added La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-16 August 2016 664 ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING capability to process wastewater to tertiary levels (suitable for irrigation), but there is no tertiary treatment available at the Mid -Valley plant. Schools The La Quinta Village area is served by the Desert Sands Unified School Districts (DSUSD) which provides public education for students in grades Kindergarten through 12. There are seven DSUSD schools in La Quinta, including three elementary schools, two middle schools, one high school and one alternative school. There are two schools adjacent to the Built -out Plan project area: Benjamin Franklin Elementary School and John Adams Elementary School. John Adams Elementary School closed at the end of the 2015/2016 school year due to declining enrollment, so Benjamin Franklin Elementary School is primary elementary school serving the area. In addition, the District's administrative offices are located in the City, on Dune Palms Road, south of Highway 111. DSUSD also provides early childhood education, after school programs, and special education services. It further serves adult GED, English as a second language, and citizenship students. There are three regional higher education institutions located in the nearby City of Palm Desert. These include the College of the Desert, a community college with associates degree and adult education programs; California State University, San Bernardino and the University of California, Riverside, each of which offers undergraduate and Master's degree programs. Libraries The La Quinta Library is located at 78-275 Calle Tampico. The City owns the library facility, which is operated by Riverside County. The Library contains 89,060 volumes within a 20,000 square foot space. Although the City has not established a standard for library facilities, the County Library system aims for an un-adopted standard of two volumes per capita. Based on this standard, existing library facilities are sufficient to serve the current population. Medical Facilities In addition to a variety of small clinics and local physician's offices throughout the Coachella Valley, there are three major regional health care facilities, all available to serve the Planning Area. These are briefly described below: John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital The John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital in the City of Indio is a 158-bed facility. It has a 24-hour emergency room, maternity care and pediatric services, an ambulatory surgery center, and an outpatient rehabilitation center. It also offers imaging services, orthopedic and joint replacement services, cardiovascular services, and a sports medicine program. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-17 August 2016 665 ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Eisenhower Medical Center The Eisenhower Medical Center (EMC) in Rancho Mirage includes a 313-bed hospital on its 130-acre campus. EMC also houses an emergency room, as well as the Annenberg Center for Health Sciences, the Barbara Sinatra Children's Center, and the Betty Ford Center. EMC recently completed the 92,000 square foot Eisenhower George and Julia Argyros Health Center in La Quinta, which includes an outpatient facility, express clinic, a pharmacy, laboratory, primary care physicians' offices, an executive wellness program, and an imaging center. Desert Regional Medical Center The Desert Regional Medical Center (DRMC) in Palm Springs is located approximately 20 miles west of La Quinta. DRMC houses 367 beds, providing general medical facilities, inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation services and the Level II Richards Emergency Trauma Center staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week with at least one physician. DRMC is the only designated Trauma Center in the Coachella Valley. Municipal Facilities The City provides municipal services and programs to the community through a variety of municipal facilities. These include City Hall, the Wellness Center, the La Quinta Library and the La Quinta Museum. With the exception of the Museum, these facilities are clustered within the City Civic Center complex, located at 78-495 Calle Tampico. The City also owns a municipal golf course and several parks facilities, which are further described in Section 5.13, Recreation. Utilities Telephone and Telecommunications Frontier Communications serves as the primary telephone (land line) provider in the City. Given improvements in technology and decreased regulation in telephone service, the public now has access to a variety of choices, including cable -based and cellular services. New technologies are expected to continue to develop that will ensure the adequate provision of telephone and telecommunications to residences, businesses and other users in the City. Electricity The Imperial Irrigation District (IID) provides electric power to the City of La Quinta. IID delivers power through generation as well as through contractual agreements with other providers. It has substations throughout the City, from which it steps down voltage for distribution to its customers. Residential uses account for the highest demand for electric power in the City. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-18 August 2016 ... ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Natural Gas The Gas Company provides natural gas where facilities are available within the City of La Quinta. There are major supply lines in Washington Street and Highway 111, but service is limited in areas south of Airport Boulevard and east of Monroe Street, as well as parts of the Cove community. Residents in these areas rely on propane gas purchased from private firms. Potential impacts to public services and utilities from implementation of the proposed Village Build - out Plan are analyzed in Section 5.17, Utilities and Infrastructure. 4.14 Recreation La Quinta's designated recreational open space totals approximately 5,259 acres. The City of La Quinta currently operates 11 city parks, the Civic Center Campus, and three nature preserve areas. All city parks, with the exception of the Civic Center Campus, provide a children's playground facility. La Quinta's three nature preserves are also available for public recreation, as they all contain trails for hiking and bicycling. There are also a number of public pocket parks located within existing subdivisions. Two regional parks located within the City of La Quinta are managed by other agencies. The 6.5 acre La Quinta Community Park, located in the Village, is managed by the Desert Recreational District, and the 845 acre Lake Cahuilla Regional Park, located in the southwestern portion of the City, is managed by the Riverside County Parks Department. Lake Cahuilla Regional Park charges a user fee for day visitors, fishing, and overnight camping. Recreational opportunities at Lake Cahuilla include fishing, equestrian trails, camping, horse camps, and hiking. The City of La Quinta also works in conjunction with the Desert Sands Unified School District to share the use of recreational facilities on school grounds. Two examples of this are the Sports Complex at the La Quinta Middle School and the soccer fields located at Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School. La Quinta is also home to one public and 22 privately owned and operated golf courses, seven of which are open and available for public use. The City's SilverRock Golf Course consists of 18 holes over 525 acres of land. The La Quinta Wellness Center is owned and operated by the City, created through renovation and expansion of the La Quinta Senior Center. The new Wellness Center opened on January 12, 2015. The 16,500 square foot facility includes multi -purpose rooms, a kitchen, classrooms, fitness facilities, locker rooms, putting greens, and other amenities. Additionally, the City has also coordinated with Family YMCA of the Desert to maintain the swimming pool at Fritz Burns Park, located near Avenue 52 and Avenida Bermudas. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-19 August 2016 ..l ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The City has developed Class I, II, and III facilities for cyclists and pedestrian use. Existing bike routes link all portions of the city, including from the southern boundary to the northern city limits. Bear Creek Path, located in the western portion of the Cove provides a popular paved walking trail along Bear Creek. In addition, there are numerous unpaved trails that provide access to open space areas. The Bear Creek Canyon Trail in the southern portion of the Cove provides hikers with approximately 4.5 miles of trail into the Santa Rosa Wilderness Area. Other trails in the region include the Boo Hoff Trail and the Cove to Lake Trail, which links Lake Cahuilla Park with the Cove. As growth and development continues to occur within the City, additional park and recreation facilities will be needed. Section 5.13, Recreation, further discusses the impacts that growth will have on recreation resources. 4.15 Transportation/Traffic The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared for the Village Build -out Plan tiered from the General Plan TIA to provide a project specific analysis that included an assessment of existing conditions. In discussion with the City's traffic engineer, the study area for the project consists the following roadways: North -south roadways that provide local circulation for the project area are: • Eisenhower Drive, • Avenida Bermudas • Desert Club Drive • Washington Street • Jefferson Street East -west roadways that provide local circulation for the project area are: • Avenue 50 • Calle Tampico • Avenue52 Eisenhower Drive: This north -south four lane divided roadway is classified as a Primary Arterial (108 foot right-of-way) in the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries approximately 9,500 to 15,500 vehicles per day in the study area. Avenida Bermudas: This north -south two lane to four lane divided roadway is classified as a Secondary Arterial (102 foot right-of-way) in the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries approximately 3,400 vehicles per day in the study area. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-20 August 2016 ..; ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Desert Club Drive: This north -south two lane undivided roadway is not classified in the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries approximately 1,900 vehicles per day in the study area. Washington Street: This north -south six lane divided roadway is classified as a Major Arterial (128 foot right-of-way) in the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries approximately 12,500 to 23,100 vehicles per day in the study area. Jefferson Street: This north -south six lane divided roadway is classified as a Major Arterial (128 foot right-of-way) in the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries approximately 19,500 vehicles per day in the study area. Avenue 50: This east -west three lane undivided to four lane divided roadway is classified as a Primary Arterial (108 foot right-of-way) in the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries an average of 2,900 vehicles per day between Eisenhower Drive and Washington Street and an average of 10,700 vehicle trips per day between Washington Street and Jefferson Street. Calle Tampico: This east -west four lane divided roadway is classified as a Primary Arterial (108 foot right-of-way) in the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries approximately 4,300 to 16,600 vehicles per day in the study area. Avenue 52: This east -west four lane divided roadway is classified as a Primary Arterial (108 foot right- of-way) in the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries approximately 11,500 to 15,600 vehicles per day in the study area. All study area intersections currently operate at Level of Service A or B except for the intersection of Desert Club Drive (NS) at Calle Tampico (EW), and Jefferson Street (NS) at Avenue 50 (EW) which both operate at Level of Service C. Level of Service is used to qualitatively describe the performance of a roadway facility, ranging from Level of Service A (free -flow conditions) to Level of Service F (extreme congestion and system failure). Level of Service C falls within the range of stable flow. The General Plan has established Level of Service D as an acceptable level of service. Therefore, all intersections and roadway segments currently operate within acceptable levels of service. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-21 August 2016 ..! ATTACH M ENT 1 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 4-22 August 2016 670 ATTACH M ENT 1 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Chapter 5 Environmental Impact Analysis 5.0 Introduction The Draft EIR for the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan provides analysis of impacts for all environmental topics. Sections 5.1 through 5.14 discuss the environmental impacts that may result with approval and implementation of the proposed project. 5.0.1 Issues Addressed in the EIR The following environmental issues are addressed in this chapter: 5.1 Aesthetics 5.9 Land Use and Planning 5.2 Air Quality 5.10 Noise 5.3 Biological Resources 5.11 Population and Housing 5.4 Cultural and Paleontological Resources 5.12 Public Services 5.5 Geology and Soils 5.13 Recreation 5.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 5.14 Traffic and Circulation 5.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 5.15 Utilities and Service Systems 5.8 Hydrology and Water Quality Each environmental issue area in Sections 5.1 through 5.14 contains: 1. An introduction of the impact being analyzed with respect to the project, including thresholds of significance; 2. The environmental setting (Existing Conditions) as it relates to the specific issue, including necessary regulatory framework and analysis methodology governing the specific issue; 3. A list of Goals and Policies from the General Plan that apply to the project; 4. An evaluation of the project -specific impacts; 5. An evaluation of Cumulative Impacts; 6. Identification of mitigation measures; and 7. A determination of the level of significance after mitigation measures is implemented. Introduction This section includes a brief introduction of the environmental impact to be analyzed within the section as it pertains to the project and references sources used to develop the section. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5-1 August 2016 671 ATTACH M ENT 1 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Environmental Setting This section contains a discussion of the existing conditions, services, and physical environment of the project site and vicinity. This section also includes any regulatory framework utilized during analysis and any methodology used during technical analysis where necessary. Applicable Goals and Policies This section lists the applicable City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan goals and/or policies that will be evaluated in the impact analysis section. Project Impact Analysis This section provides a discussion of the impacts of the proposed La Quinta Village Build -out Plan in qualitative and quantitative terms. A discussion of the thresholds of significance utilized to analyze the impacts is also included. Thresholds of Significance Determining the severity of project impacts is fundamental to achieving the objectives of CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, which requires that decision makers mitigate, as completely as is feasible, the significant impacts identified in the EIR. If the EIR identifies any significant unmitigated impacts, CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 requires decision makers approving a project to adopt a statement of overriding considerations that explains why the benefits of the project outweigh the adverse environmental consequences associated with implementation of the project. The level of significance for each impact examined in the EIR was determined by considering the predicted magnitude of the impact against applicable significance criteria. Thresholds were developed using criteria from the CEQA Guidelines and the Environmental Checklist; State, federal, and local regulatory guidance; local/regional plans and ordinances; accepted practices; consultation with recognized experts; and other professional opinions. The following adjectives are used specifically to define the degree of impact used in the Impact Analysis and Mitigation. An "adverse" impact is any negative result of the project, however small. As a disclosure document, the finding of an impact as "adverse" merely indicates that the project will cause an impact to occur compared to existing conditions, even though that impact may be less than significant. For example, the removal of a stand of healthy trees from a vacant site might be considered adverse (i.e., "negative") but it may not exceed a local threshold such as loss of native trees. Therefore, an impact may be adverse without being significant. A "significant" impact is considered a substantial negative effect if it exceeds a critical and accepted threshold for negative environmental effects. CEQA defines a significant effect on the environment La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5-2 August 2016 672 ATTACH M ENT 1 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS as "...a substantial or potentially substantial, adverse (i.e., negative) change in any of the physical conditions within the area by the project, including land, air, water, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance... (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15383). As recommended in the CEQA Guidelines impacts are also identified as "potentially significant" prior to mitigation. A "cumulative" impact is a compilation of a project's impact when considered in concert with other approved projects, projects under consideration for entitlement, or recently completed projects, that when combined with the project being evaluated in the EIR could produce related or cumulative impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15130). Cumulative Impacts The discussion of cumulative impacts reflects the severity of the impacts and their likelihood of occurrence, focusing on the cumulative impact to which the identified cumulative projects contribute. Mitigation Measures In some cases, following the impact discussion, reference is made to State and federal regulations and agency policies that would fully or partially mitigate the impact. In addition, policies and programs from applicable local land use plans that partially or fully mitigate the impact may be cited. Project -specific mitigation measures, beyond those contained in other documents, are offset with a summary heading and described using the format presented below: AES-1 Project -specific mitigation is identified that would reduce the impact to the lowest degree feasible. The mitigation number links the particular mitigation to the impact with which it is associated (AES-1 in this example). A mitigation monitoring and reporting program will be developed, incorporating all mitigation measures presented within this EIR. All mitigation measures will be written with a means of monitoring or reporting on implementation and enforcement. Level of Significance After Mitigation This section identifiesthe resulting level of significance of the impactfollowing mitigation. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5-3 August 2016 673 ATTACH M ENT 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5-4 August 2016 674 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.1 AESTHETICS 5.1 Aesthetics 5.1.1 Introduction The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area is located in the eastern portion of the Coachella Valley in Central Riverside County, along the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains. The desert setting and surrounding mountains provides a picturesque backdrop and aesthetically pleasing environment for the community. This section describes the existing aesthetic qualities of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area, discusses the potential impacts that may occur from implementation of the Build -out Plan and Zoning Code text amendment, and identifies mitigation measures to reduce any potentially significant impacts to visual and scenic resources, or light and glare impacts. Sources used in the evaluation of potential impacts to Aesthetics are included in Chapter 9, References. 5.1.2 Existing Conditions Environmental Setting The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area is situated in the western portion of the City of La Quinta. The region is in an area known as the Salton Trough, which is a fault controlled basin caused by the complex system of faults crossing the region, including the San Andreas Fault to the north. The Salton Trough is an expansive basin that runs in a northwest to southeast direction, and includes varying topography and wildlife habitats. The valley is surrounded on the north and south by mountains that have been uplifted over time due to seismic activity. A foothill ridge extension of the Santa Rosa Mountains, known as the Coral Mountains, is the main topographic and scenic feature in the area. This ridge, which includes Eisenhower and Indio Peaks to the west of the La Quinta Village, runs along the western boundary of the City in a southerly to northerly direction just west of the La Quinta Village. As their name implies, the Coral Mountains look like giant coral reefs springing up from the valley floor. Other topographic features in the area include the main backdrop of the Santa Rosa Mountains, located directly south of the Village, and the Indio Hills, located across and along the northeastern edge of the Coachella Valley. The Santa Rosa Mountains and their foothills and peaks are part of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument, and will remain as open space in perpetuity, thus affording residents and visitors with permanent scenic vistas. Scenic Conditions The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area and immediate vicinity are comprised of multiple land uses, including commercial, residential, community facilities, recreational facilities, and vacant land. Development in La Quinta is generally built at lower densities, and buildings in the Village tend La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.1-1 August 2016 675 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.1 AESTHETICS to be low-rise (one- and two story structures). Views of local mountains and scenic vistas from points throughout the Village are already partially obstructed by existing buildings, walls, and mature landscaping. Within the Village, Calle Tampico is designated as an Image Corridor arterial because it affords unobstructed views of the Coral Mountains. Likewise, views looking south along Washington Street provide a relatively unobstructed view of the Coral Mountains. Views of the Little San Bernardino Mountains on the north side of the Valley are generally only available from Washington Street and to a lesser extent, from Eisenhower Drive; both view corridors are partially obstructed by existing mature palm trees and structures along the streets. Visual Character The existing visual character of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area can be characterized as a small traditional City core, representative of the City's roots. This character is influenced by typical downtown land uses, including retail commercial uses, professional and commercial office uses, community facilities, parks, multi -family housing, and some single family residences. These land uses are built along landscaped streets with curb, gutter, and sidewalks. The Village contains a smaller community scale of commercial development, and does not contain large retail, big box retail centers as noticeably found along the City's Highway 111 corridor. Architectural Styles La Quinta architecture includes a mixture of building types built over various time periods, and with a variety of styles. The development time sequence ranges from structures built in the early twentieth century, and new master -planned communities built within the last decade. Architectural styles include those typical of Spanish Colonial, Mediterranean, Tuscan, and Modern styles. Spanish Colonial architecture is the most prevalent style used in the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area, and examples include the Old Town development, the La Quinta Museum, and the nearby La Quinta Resort and Spa. The City has an adopted set of design guidelines — The Village at La Quinta: Design Guidelines, 1998, that have been utilized to guide development in the Village, including the development of the Old Town La Quinta development at Calle Tampico between Desert Club Drive and Avenida Bermudas. Light and Glare Existing playing fields and recreational facilities within the La Quinta Village, such as La Quinta Community Park, produce light and glare from overhead field lights. Major streets also produce light and glare from street lamps, signalized intersections, and vehicle headlights. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.1-2 August 2016 676 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.1 AESTHETICS 5.1.3 Applicable Goals and Policies The La Quinta General Plan 2035, includes goals and policies that would apply to the development of new projects in the Village Build -out Plan project area. These are: GOAL LU-3 Safe and identifiable neighborhoods that provide a sense of place. Policy LU-3.3 Maintain residential development standards including setbacks, height, pad elevations and other design and performance standards that assure a high quality of development in the Zoning Ordinance. Program LU-3.3.a: Provide incentives in the Zoning Ordinance for creative and high quality development; projects that reduce the dependence on automobiles; projects that incorporate trails and paths for pedestrians and bicycles; and projects that incorporate transit and alternative transportation facilities into their designs. GOAL LU-6 A balanced and varied economic base which provides a broad range of goods and services to the City's residents and the region. Policy LU-6.2 Maintain commercial development standards in the Zoning Ordinance, including setbacks, height, pad elevations and other design and performance standards that assure a high quality of development. r;nAl / 1 /-7 Innovative land uses in the Village and on Highway 111. Policy LU-7.6 Review and amend, as necessary, the Village Design Guidelines to allow maximum flexibility for Mixed Use projects. The Village at La Quinta Design Guidelines (Design Guidelines), provide Goals and Guiding Principles for development in the Village. Goals related to Aesthetics and Scenic Resources are found in Section II.C. Site and Building Design. The intent of the Site and Building Design policies is to provide for architectural variation and detailing to break up the monotony of building elevations and incorporate design elements that draw in pedestrians and reinforce street activities. However, the Design Guidelines specifically limit building heights to two story, and the Zoning Code limits building heights in the Village Commercial District to 35 feet. The Design Guidelines also focus on Site Design and Activity Space and the intended pedestrian scale of the Village, where structures must be sited to create internal spaces, with pedestrian access La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.1-3 August 2016 677 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.1 AESTHETICS available from the street or off-street parking and entries into shops and offices must access directly to a pedestrian oriented street or other pedestrian access. Accessory provisions of the Design Guidelines encourage the provision of street furnishings including bicycle racks, trash receptacles, benches and drinking fountains that encourage pedestrian and cycling as a means to move through the Village. Signs must be ground mounted or building mounted with no pole signs allowed. Such signs include directional signs that promote way -finding. Finally, lighting and landscaping guidelines are part of the Design Guidelines and include requirements for lighting to be low level and limited primarily to landscape areas; and must be consistent with the City's Outdoor Light Control Ordinance. Building mounted lighting must be designed to highlight building entries, dramatize specific architectural features and accentuate light and shadow to articulate facades. Landscaping requirements focus on providing shade for pedestrians and in parking areas as well as providing screening of parking lots, utility boxes, servicing and waste enclosures and other unsightly areas. No comprehensive Village landscape plan has been developed; however, all new developments must comply with the City's Zoning Code, Chapter 8.13, Water Efficient Landscaping). 5.1.4 Project Impact Analysis The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan, Zoning Code text amendment to remove the 35-foot height restriction, will facilitate the development of vacant land and redevelopment of existing properties by providing greater flexibility in building design and density. The Build -out Plan quantifies the maximum allowable square footage by land use and by location (see Table 3-3 in Chapter 3, Project Description). While the Design Guidelines are proposed to be rescinded, the Build -out Plan calls for City staff to rely on the Zoning Code (as amended by this Plan), and Design Review on a project by project basis to guide building setbacks, parkway easements and pedestrian corridors to allow an increase in density and intensity of uses while still maintaining the Village as a livable, pedestrian friendly community. Where the Zone Text amendment will allow buildings to exceed 35 feet in height, it will supersede the height restriction in the rest of the City. The Zoning Code text amendment would allow building heights within the Plan area of up to 60 feet. The General Plan designations for the Village Build -out Plan project area include: Village Commercial The Village Commercial Designation applies specifically to the traditional Commercial core of the City, and allows specialty retail; such as boutiques and art galleries as well as restaurants, professional La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.1-4 August 2016 678 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.1 AESTHETICS offices and services, and hotels. Apartments, condominiums and live -work space is also appropriate in this designation. As established in General Plan 2035 Policy LU-7.1, mixed use development is allowed in this designation. Mixed use projects can include vertical or horizontal combinations of land uses that are integrated through pedestrian connections and common areas; or can include residential units added to existing commercial development at the discretion of the Architectural and Landscape Review Board and Planning Commission. The Village Commercial Land Use has the greatest potential for development/redevelopment in the Build -out Plan project area because approximately 127 acres of the land being considered for development/redevelopment is designated Village Commercial. Development/redevelopment has potential to increase commercial development by 747,787 square feet and residential development up to 1,230 dwelling units in the Village Commercial land use designation. Note: some of these dwelling units could be developed in CG, but the maximum combined number would not be greater than 1,230 du. General Commercial This land use designation applies to the majority of commercial land in the City but in the La Quinta Build -out Plan project area, only to the site at the northwest corner of Washington Street and Calle Tampico, now occupied by a commercial center. The full range of commercial uses can occur within this designation, ranging from supermarkets and drugstores in a neighborhood shopping center, to major national retailers in large buildings. General Commercial uses also include professional offices, service businesses, restaurants, hotels or motels, research and development and warehousing or similar low impact quasi -industrial projects. As established in General Plan 2035 Policy LU-7.1, mixed use development is also appropriate in this designation. The area designated as General Commercial is located north of Calle Tampico. It is currently developed with a shopping center and there are no current proposals to modify land uses at that site. The site consists of seven parcels, totaling 72,450 square feet. Redevelopment under the Build -out Plan has potential to increase commercial square footage by about 52,000 square feet in the General Commercial land use area. This site may also include residential as it is considered part of the dwelling unit count allowed north of Calle Tampico. When combined, Village Commercial and General Commercial properties north of Calle Tampico could accommodate up to 613 dwelling units and 346,000 sf of non-residential use. Recreational Open Space The Recreational Open Space designation applies to parks, recreation facilities (such as driving ranges, club houses and athletic facilities), and public and private golf courses. In the Village Build - out Plan project area, these uses are situated between Eisenhower Drive and Avenida Navarro, and no changes are proposed. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.1-5 August 2016 679 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.1 AESTHETICS Major Community Facilities The Major Community Facilities Land Use designation has been assigned to existing or planned municipal, educational or public facilities; such as City and Desert Sands Unified School District facilities and buildings, utility facilities and buildings, fire stations, public parking lots, and similar uses. The Village Build -out Plan does not assume any changes in existing conditions for properties designated Major Community Facilities or Recreational Open Space. Thresholds of Significance The criteria for establishing the significance of potential impacts on visual resources came from Appendix G of the State CEQA guidelines and apply to the proposed Village Build -out area. A significant impact would occur if the proposed project: a. Has a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista. b. Substantially damages scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway. c. Substantially degrades the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. d. Creates a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. a. Substantial Adverse Effect on Scenic Vistas For purposes of determining significance under CEQA, a scenic vista is defined as a viewpoint that provides expansive views of a highly valued landscape for the benefit of the general public. In addition, some scenic vistas are officially designated by public agencies, or informally designated by tourist guides. A substantial adverse effect to such a scenic vista is one that degrades the view from such a designated view spot. The Village Build -out Plan project area is located on relatively flat topography, and is developed with a number of urban uses including one- and two-story buildings, and mature landscaping and trees. Under existing conditions, there are no viewpoints that would provide an expansive view of the local mountains. For adjacent land uses to the north of the project area, views of the Coral Mountains and Santa Rosa Mountains are currently either partially blocked by walls, trees and buildings, or these features are located within the viewshed of these uses, generally situated along Calle Tampico east of Desert Club Drive (senior apartments) and around the Golf Course at Duna La Quinta, adjacent to the northerly boundary of the project area. Therefore, there would be no adverse effect on a scenic vista resulting from the development of new residential and non-residential uses in the project area, and this impact is considered to be less than significant. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.1-6 August 2016 .:e ATTACH M ENT 1 5.1 AESTHETICS b. Substantial Adverse Effect on Scenic Resources Scenic Resources includes trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings that are visible from a State scenic highway, or locally significant scenic resources such as the Coral Mountains to the south and west of the Village. Currently, there are no State scenic highways that run through La Quinta or near the Village Build -out Plan project area. However, the City has one street in the project area that is designated as a City Image Corridor - Calle Tampico. A City Image Corridor, is a corridor that provides views of scenic resources such as the Coral Mountains and related Santa Rosa Mountains. Within the Village Build -out Plan project area, residents and visitors currently have partial views of natural features, including the Coral Mountains to the south and west, and to a lesser extent the Little San Bernardino Mountains to the north. These views are restricted by the Village's location on relatively flat topography as well as existing buildings and mature trees throughout the project area. The Village Build -out Plan will facilitate new development on sites that are currently vacant, and encourage redevelopment in existing underutilized areas within the project area. The development of new manmade structures, including buildings, streets, signage, walls, as well as landscaping, have the potential to replace or disrupt current views of the surrounding natural landscape across vacant lots and underutilized lots, particularly views of the Coral Mountain with its Indio and Eisenhower peaks to the west. Future development projects within the project area could also potentially affect views of scenic resources if they increase the intensity of the built environment by developing multi- story buildings above two stories. In addition, conversion of empty lots or parking lots into new building sites increases the potential to block views of the surrounding desert and mountains from existing development. In order achieve the goals of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan of an additional 1,200+ residences and an additional 799,000+ square feet of non-residential uses, the building density both vertically and horizontally, must increase. Building heights up to 60 feet, plus potentially greater lot coverage allowed on a project by project basis, will result in a more dense Village with the potential to obstruct mountain views from local roads and residences. This represents an adverse and potentially significant impact on scenic resources. However, by considering views and view corridors on a project - by -project basis, setbacks from public streets, especially Calle Tampico, and setbacks between buildings, can reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Image Corridors and Views from Roadways Along Calle Tampico, views of the mountains to the west are relatively unobstructed with the exception of the palm trees that line the street on either side. In addition, although not designated, Washington Street, representing the eastern boundary of the project area, and Eisenhower Drive representing the western boundary of the project area, also provide mountain views. Under future conditions, these views can be maintained by requiring building setbacks from the street, securing La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.1-7 August 2016 681 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.1 AESTHETICS parkway easements, and expanding access for bicycles and golf carts. The intent is to ensure that the public views along Calle Tampico and other streets to a lesser extent, are not compromised. Public Utilities would also be considered when reviewing applications on sites within the project area that access Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive and undergrounding overhead utilities will be required. Threats to the City's scenic image corridors include inappropriate and unattractive land uses, unattractive or inadequate landscaping, inadequately buffered parking, excessive or inappropriate signage, high walls and berms that block views, and overhead power lines that degrade views. The protection and enhancement of views along City image corridors is also furthered by securing parkway easements along major roadways, and building setbacks from roads. Enhanced parkways would better assure viewshed protection and provide expanded access for alternative modes of travel. Parkway easements along image corridors help assure that the traveling public (and adjoining property owners) share in a quality landscaped parkway experience. As stated previously, the impact to scenic resources could be adverse in that intensifying urban uses in the Village Build -out Plan project area would result in the development of additional buildings, and that those buildings would be allowed to be taller than the currently permitted two -stories and 35 feet in height by 10 to 25 feet above what is currently permitted. As identified in Table 3-2, in Chapter 3, Project Description, future development could result in an additional 1,230 dwelling units and up to 799,786 square feet of non-residential uses. In order to accommodate this growth within an approximately 137 acre project area footprint, understanding that most of the properties in the project area are already developed, the success of this Build -out Plan is dependent on the elimination of the building height restriction. The significance of this impact is qualitative and subjective in that views of scenic resources from locations within the Village Build -out Plan project area would likely be obstructed, however, when the viewer moves further from the Village, views of these same scenic resources would be improved by providing distance between the viewer and the obstruction. Views of the Coral Mountains from outside the Village would still be available, although the new buildings would likely be within the middle ground of the view. In the future, with new buildings in place, views of the Coral Mountains will likely be less available for viewers within the Village. However, future projects proposed within the project area will be subject to requirements of the Zoning Code, Design Guidelines, and Site Plan Review, which would include an analysis of the proposed building's height and massing, and its relationship to other buildings in or adjacent to the Village that may be adversely affected by new development. Where feasible, view corridors that can be created by providing pedestrian corridors linked between building sites may also provide opportunities for views of the scenic mountains to the south and west. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.1-8 August 2016 my, ATTACH M ENT 1 5.1 AESTHETICS With adherence to requirements of the La Quinta Zoning Code for setbacks from public streets and setbacks from adjacent buildings, and conditions placed on a project by the Architectural and Landscape Review Board and/or the Planning Commission, the Village Build -out Plan would have a less than significant impact on aesthetics. This discussion is formalized in Section 5.1.6, Mitigation Measures, below. c. Substantial Degradation to Visual Character or Quality of the Site This impact focuses on the potential to degrade the visual character and quality of site development with regard to a future project's place within the Village's built environment. Incompatible land uses or building design - including height - have the potential to degrade the visual character and quality of the experience in the Village. The existing visual character of the Village Build -out project area includes the existing look, feel, and quality of a traditional core of a City, representing its roots. Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan has the potential to cause significant impacts on the existing visual character and quality of the experience of residents, business owners/staff, and visitors in the Village. Existing development within the Village consists of retail stores, offices, community facilities, parks, and apartments and some single family homes; and a shopping center at the northwest corner of Calle Tampico and Washington Street. Existing buildings tend to be low-rise structures (one- and two- story) and are interspersed with vacant properties. An interconnected street system provides accessibility throughout the Village. For the most part, streets are developed with sidewalks, curbs, and gutters. Landscaping along public right-of-ways provides visual relief from the built environment and enhances the visual character of the community. The Village Build -out Plan does not include any changes to the General Plan land use designations or Zoning District designations, but does include proposed increases in intensity or density to allow for a more integrated urban feel created by allowing residential uses above non-residential uses, and increasing building heights to provide greater density in the Village. This requires a Zoning Code text amendment to specifically allow for increased intensity and density of land uses in the Village. Any proposed increase in intensity or density would be considered on a project by project basis to ensure quality development and compatibility with land uses on adjacent sites, and within the Village as a whole; and create opportunities either individually or combined with other related projects in the Village to incorporate trails and paths for pedestrians and bicycles; and to incorporate transit and alternative transportation facilities into their designs. This is consistent with Goal LU-3 and Program LU-3.3.a, to provide incentives in the Zoning Code for creative and high quality development. The Build -out Plan is also consistent with Goal LU-6 by allowing for a mix of uses to create a balanced and varied economic base which provides a broad range of goods and services to the City's residents and the region; and Policy 6-2 to maintain commercial development, design and performance La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.1-9 August 2016 683 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.1 AESTHETICS standards to assure high quality development. Finally, the Build -out Plan is consistent with Goal LU-7 to encourage innovative land uses in the Village; and Policy LU-7.6, whereby the City will review the design of a development project to allow maximum flexibility for Mixed Use projects as they are proposed. Adherence with General Plan goals, policies and programs would ensure that new projects on vacant parcels are architecturally designed consistent with the City's intent and conditions placed on a project by the Architectural and Landscape Review Board and Planning Commission to facilitate a consistent and creative character of development within the Village; and that properties where existing buildings would be replaced with new development, those projects would continue to improve the visual character and quality of experience in the Village. Therefore, impacts in regard to substantial degradation to visual character and quality of a site as a result of implementation of the Village Build -out Plan would be less than significant. d. Substantial Adverse Effect on Light and Glare Light and glare impacts would be associated with increased urbanization in the project area. Within the Village, the majority of properties are developed, and daytime and nighttime skies are already affected to a limited extent of light and glare. Development of vacant land, and/or new replacement projects that may be developed on some underutilized properties within the Village would likely increase light and glare in the area. The visibility of dark skies could be diminished with an increase in traffic headlights, building lighting, streetlights, and indoor illumination. The City Outdoor Lighting Ordinance (Section 9.100.150 of the Municipal Code) provides regulations for reducing light and glare caused by new development as set forth in Mitigation Measure AES-1, therefore resulting in a less than significant impact. 5.1.5 Cumulative Impacts The proposed Village Build -out Plan applies to only that area within the approximately 137-acre project area. The potential impacts on Aesthetics associated with the increased intensity of land uses and the density of dwelling units is unique to the Village Commercial District and the lands north of Tampico included in the Plan area. The rest of the City of La Quinta would not be affected by the implementation of this Plan. Therefore, impacts to scenic resources and the visual character or quality of a site are local and do not contribute to a cumulative impact. The analysis of the Village Build -out Plan and the potential adverse and/or significant impacts associated with implementation were found to be less than significant (scenic vistas and visual character) or less than significant with mitigation incorporated (light and glare); and because the proposed Build -out Plan only applies to the 137-acre Village project area, and not the rest of the City, no cumulative impact was identified and cumulative impacts on scenic resources would be less than significant. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.1-10 August 2016 684 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.1 AESTHETICS Light and glare produced from new development within the Village will be cumulative towards the City's overall contribution to light and glare emitted from existing developed land use activities. However, it must be noted that lighting restrictions are in place for the La Quinta Cove which prohibit public street pole lighting and that any addition of new development from the Village without mitigation in addressing outdoor lighting would be considered as a significant cumulative impact to the region. Therefore, implementation of Mitigation Measure AES-1 will safeguard the protection of the surrounding community from light and glare and reduce potential cumulative impacts to less than significant levels. 5.1.6 Mitigation Measures Future development in the Village Build -out Plan project area could have an adverse effect on scenic resources and the visual character or quality of a site. Future development proposals would be subject to the requirements set forth in the Zoning Code and on a project by project basis, review by the City's Architectural and Landscape Review Board and Planning Commission, and subject to conditions of approval related to building design for building setbacks from streets, parkway easements, and pedestrian corridors, particularly for new development projects proposed along Calle Tampico. Site Plan Review on a project by project basis, and considering each project within the context of other existing or future buildings in the project area would ensure that views of scenic resources and the visual character or quality of a site would be less than significant. Examples of ways to minimize impacts include: • Where feasible, view corridors would be created by providing pedestrian corridors linked between building sites to provide opportunities for views of the scenic mountains to the south and west. • Building setbacks from Calle Tampico and other streets, would also help preserve view corridors. • Parkway easements along either side of existing streets, along building setbacks would also help preserve view corridors. Regarding Light and Glare, the following mitigation measure would apply to all projects in the project area. AES-1 During the building permit application, evidence must be submitted to prove that the proposed work will comply with the City Outdoor Lighting Ordinance of the Municipal Code. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.1-11 August 2016 685 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.1 AESTHETICS Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting A. The Building and Safety Department is responsible for reviewing development plans and applications to ensure that the project is in compliance with Section 9.100.150 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Responsible Parties: Building and Safety Department 5.1.7 Level of Significance after Mitigation Compliance with Zoning Code requirements and the updated Design Guidelines, and the implementation of Mitigation Measure AES-1, impacts on Aesthetics will have a less than significant impact in the Village Build -out Plan project area. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.1-12 August 2016 MOT ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY 5.2 Air Quality 5.2.1 Introduction This section describes the existing air quality setting and potential impacts from implementation of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan within the project area and the surrounding area. Information for this section was obtained from the Air Quality Assessment entitled, La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Air Quality and Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, prepared by Kunzman Associates, March 2016. The report is included in Appendix B. Sources used in the preparation are included in Chapter 9, References. 5.2.2 Existing Conditions Environmental Setting Air quality conditions are a result of the geographic setting and local and regional activities. Local development and population growth, traffic, construction activities, and various site disturbances in the City of La Quinta result in the emission of air pollutants that affect local air quality. Although air pollution is emitted from various sources locally, regional air quality emissions also have an effect on local air quality. Activities outside of the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB), in which La Quinta is located, result in the emission of pollutants that make their way into the SSAB from adjacent air basins, including the South Coast Air Basin. Air quality in a given locality is a function of the amount of pollutants emitted and dispersed, as well as the local climatic and geographic conditions, which may reduce or enhance the formation of pollutants. The City of La Quinta is located in the Coachella Valley, and is subject to weather conditions that are typical of an inland desert climate. The San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountain Ranges west of La Quinta effectively cut off the region from coastal influences. During the summer, temperatures exceed 100°F. In the summer months, daily highs are around 105°F and lows are around 75°F. In the winter, temperatures can drop below 20°F, although winters are typically moderate, with daily average temperature highs around 70°F and lows around 50°F. Annual rainfall is typically less than 4 inches on the Valley floor, with higher mountain slopes receiving increased rainfall with increased elevation. Precipitation often occurs in relatively high volumes in short duration, and results in stormwater runoff with considerable sediment deposition on the Valley floor. The City of La Quinta is subject to high intensity wind events year round. During fall and winter months, high-pressure systems from the north can conflict with low-pressure systems from the south, and create a condition known as the Santa Ana winds, which can blow for multiple days at high La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR 5.2-1 August 2016 687 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY speeds. These strong winds sweep up, suspend and transport large quantities of sand and dust, reducing visibility, damaging property and constituting a significant health threat. Regulatory Setting The Village Build -out Plan is subject to the efforts of federal, state, regional, and local government agencies. These agencies work jointly, as well as individually, to improve air quality through legislation, regulations, planning, policy -making, education, and a variety of programs. The agencies responsible for improving the air quality are briefly discussed here. Federal United States Environmental Protection Agency The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for setting and enforcing the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for atmospheric pollutants. It regulates emission sources that are under the exclusive authority of the federal government, such as aircraft, ships, and certain locomotives. NAAQS pollutants were identified using medical evidence and are shown below in Table 5.2-1, State and Federal Criteria Pollutant Standards. As part of its enforcement responsibilities, the EPA requires each state with federal nonattainment areas to prepare and submit a State Implementation Plan (SIP) that demonstrates the means to attain the national standards. The SIP must integrate federal, state, and local components and regulations to identify specific measures to reduce pollution, using a combination of performance standards and market -based programs within the timeframe identified in the SIP. As indicated below in Table 5.2-2, Salton Sea Air Basin Attainment Status, the Coachella Valley -portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin has been designated by the EPA as a non -attainment area for ozone (03) and suspended particulates (PM1o). Currently, the Basin is in attainment with the ambient air quality standards for carbon monoxide (CO), lead, sulfur dioxide (S02), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and particulate matter (PM2.5). On December 14, 2012, the EPA revised the primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS from 15 µg/m3 to 12 µg/m3 and retained the 24 hour PM2.5 standard at 35 µg/m3 in order to provide increased protection for children, older adults, persons with pre-existing heart and lung disease and other at risk populations. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-2 August 2016 off -IF." ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY Table 5.2-1 State and Federal Criteria Pollutant Standards Concentration / Averaging Time California Air Standards Primary Pollutant Standards Most Relevant Effects (a) Decline in pulmonary function and localized lung edema in humans and animals; (b) Risk to public health implied by alterations in pulmonary morphology and host defense in animals; (c) Increased Ozone (03) 0.09 ppm/1-hour 0.070 ppm/8- mortality risk; (d) Risk to public health implied by altered connective 0.07 ppm/8-hour hour tissue metabolism and altered pulmonary morphology in animals after long-term exposures and pulmonary function decrements in chronically exposed humans; (e) Vegetation damage; and (f) Property damage. (a) Aggravation of angina pectoris and other aspects of coronary Carbon p r 35.0 ppm/1- heart disease; (b) Decreased exercise tolerance in persons with Monoxide m/8-h u 9.0 ppm/8-hour 9.0 hour peripheral vascular disease and lung disease; (c) Impairment of (CO) 9.0 ppm/8-hour central nervous system functions; and (d) Possible increased risk to fetuses. (a) Potential to aggravate chronic respiratory disease and respiratory Nitrogen ppm/1-hour 0.03 100 ppb/1-hour symptoms in sensitive groups; (b) Risk to public health implied by Dioxide 0. ppm/annual 0.053 pulmonary and extra -pulmonary biochemical and cellular changes (N0') ppm/annual and pulmonary structural changes; and (c) Contribution to atmospheric discoloration. Sulfur ppm/1-hour 75 ppb/1-hour (a) Bronchoconstriction accompanied by symptoms which may Dioxide 004 .04 ppm/24-hour 0.14 ppm/24- include wheezing, shortness of breath and chest tightness, during (so') hour exercise or physical activity in persons with asthma. Suspended Particulate 50 µg/m3/24-hour 150 µg/m3/24- Matter 20 µg/m3/annual hour (a) Exacerbation of symptoms in sensitive patients with respiratory or (PM10) cardiovascular disease; (b) Declines in pulmonary function growth in children; (c) Increased risk of premature death from heart or lung Suspended 35 µg/m3/24- Particulate 12 µg/m3 / annual hour diseases in elderly. Matter 12 (PMZ.5) µg/m3/annual No Federal (a) Decrease in ventilatory function; (b) Aggravation of asthmatic Sulfates 25 µg/m3/24-hour Standards symptoms; (c ) Aggravation of cardio-pulmonary disease; (d) Vegetation damage; (e) Degradation of visibility; (f) property damage. Lead 1.5 3/30-day 0.15 µg/m3/3- (a) Learning disabilities; (b) Impairment of blood formation and nerve µg/m month rolling conduction. Extinction coefficient of 0.23 Visibility per kilometer - Reducing visibility of 10 No Federal Visibility impairment on days when relative humidity is less than 70 Particles miles or more due Standards percent. to particles when humidity is less than 70 percent. Source: Inc. Air Quality & Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, Table 3, Kunzman Associates, March 2016 La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-3 August 2016 .:• ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY Table 5.2-2 Salton Sea Air Basin Attainment Status Pollutant State Status' National Status2 Ozone Nonattainment Nonattainment Carbon monoxide Attainment Attainment Nitrogen dioxide Attainment Unclassified/Attainment Sulfur dioxide Attainment Attainment PM10 Nonattainment Nonattainment PM2.5 Attainment Nonattainment Source: Inc. Air Quality & Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, Table 4, Kunzman Associates, March 2016 Notes: 1. Source of State status: California Air Resources Board 2013. 2. Source of National status: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2012 State California Air Resources Board The California Air Resources Board (CARB), which is a part of the California Environmental Protection Agency, is responsible for the coordination and administration of both federal and state air pollution control programs within California. In this capacity, the CARB conducts research, sets the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), compiles emission inventories, develops suggested control measures, provides oversight of local programs, and prepares the State Implementation Plan (SIP) (Refer to CAAQS criteria pollutants in Table 5.2-1). In addition, the CARB establishes emission standards for motor vehicles sold in California, consumer products (e.g. hairspray, aerosol paints, and barbeque lighter fluid), and various types of commercial equipment. It also sets fuel specifications to further reduce vehicular emissions. The Coachella Valley has been designated by the CARB as a non -attainment area for ozone and PM1o. Currently, the Coachella Valley is in attainment with the ambient air quality standards for CO, lead, S02, NO2, PM2.5, and sulfates and is unclassified for visibility reducing particles and Hydrogen Sulfide. On June 20, 2002, the CARB revised the PM10 annual average standard to 20 µg/m3 and established an annual average standard for PM2.5 of 12 µg/m3. These standards were approved by the Office of Administrative Law in June 2003 and are now effective. On September 27, 2007 CARB approved the South Coast Air Basin and the Coachella Valley 2007 Air Quality Management Plan for Attaining the Federal 8-hour Ozone and PM2.5 Standards. The plan projects attainment for the 8-hour Ozone standard by 2024 and the PM2.5 standard by 2015. On December 12, 2008 the CARB adopted Resolution 08-43, which limits NO, PM10 and PM2.5 emissions from on -road diesel truck fleets that operate in California. On October 12, 2009 Executive Order R-09-010 was adopted that codified Resolution 08-43 into Section 2025, title 13 of the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-4 August 2016 .•0 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY California Code of Regulations. This regulation requires that by the year 2023 all commercial diesel trucks that operate in California meet model year 2010 (Tier 4) or later emission standards. In the interim period, this regulation provides annual interim targets for fleet owners to meet. This regulation also provides a few exemptions including a onetime per year 3-day pass for trucks registered outside of California. The CARB is also responsible for regulations pertaining to toxic air contaminants. The Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act (AB 2588, 1987, Connelly) was enacted in 1987 as a means to establish a formal air toxics emission inventory risk quantification program. AB 2588, as amended, establishes a process that requires stationary sources to report the type and quantities of certain substances their facilities routinely release into the South Coast Air Basin. The data is ranked by high, intermediate, and low categories, which are determined by the potency, toxicity, quantity, volume, and proximity of the facility to nearby receptors. Regional South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) The SCAQMD is the agency principally responsible for comprehensive air pollution control in the Coachella Valley. To that end, as a regional agency, the SCAQMD works directly with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), county transportation commissions, and local governments and cooperates actively with all federal and state agencies. The SCAQMD develops rules and regulations, establishes permitting requirements for stationary sources, inspects emission sources, and enforces regulatory measures through educational programs or fines, when necessary. The SCAQMD is directly responsible for reducing emissions from stationary, mobile, and indirect sources. It has responded to this requirement by preparing a sequence of AQMPs. A revised draft of the 2012 AQMP was released on September, 2012, was adopted by the SCAQMD Board on December 7, 2012, and was adopted by CARB via Resolution 13-3 on January 25, 2013. The 2012 AQMP was prepared in order to meet the federal Clean Air Act requirement that all 24-hour PM2.5 non -attainment areas prepare a SIP, that were required to be submitted to the U.S. EPA by December 14, 2012 and demonstrate attainment with the 24-hour PMz.s standard by 2014. The 2012 AQMP demonstrates attainment of the federal 24-hour PMz.s standard by 2014 in the Basin through adoption of all feasible measures. The 2012 AQMP builds upon the approaches taken in the 2007 AQMP for the attainment of federal PM and ozone standards, and highlights the significant amount of reductions needed and the need to engage in interagency coordinated planning of mobile sources to meet all of the federal criteria pollutant standards. Compared with the 2007 AQMP, the 2012 AQMP utilizes revised emissions inventory projections that use 2008 as the base year. On -road emissions are calculated using CARB La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-5 August 2016 691 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY EMFAC2011 emission factors and the transportation activity data provided by SCAG from their 2012 Regional Transportation Plan (2012 RTP). Off -road emissions were updated using CARB's 2011 In -Use Off -Road Fleet Inventory Model. Since the 2007 AQMP was finalized new area source categories such as liquid propane gas transmission losses, storage tank and pipeline cleaning and degassing, and architectural colorants, were created and included in the emissions inventories. The 2012 AQMP also includes analysis of several additional sources of GHG emissions such as landfills and could also assist in reaching the GHG target goals in the AB32 Scoping Plan. During construction and operation, all projects within the Village Build -out Plan must comply with applicable rules and regulations. The following are rules that the Village will be required to comply with, either directly, or indirectly: SCAQMD Rule 402 prohibits a person from discharging from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause injury or damage to business or property. SCAQMD Rule 403 governs emissions of fugitive dust during construction and operation activities. Compliance with this rule is achieved through application of standard Best Management Practices, such as application of water or chemical stabilizers to disturbed soils, covering haul vehicles, restricting vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour, sweeping loose dirt from paved site access roadways, cessation of construction activity when winds exceed 25 mph, and establishing a permanent ground cover on finished sites. Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be controlled with best available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. In addition, SCAQMD Rule 403 requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off -site. Applicable dust suppression techniques from Rule 403 are summarized below. Implementation of these dust suppression techniques can reduce the fugitive dust generation (and thus the PMlo component). Compliance with these rules would reduce impacts on nearby sensitive receptors. Rule 403 measures may include but are not limited to the following measures: • Apply nontoxic chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers' specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for 10 days or more). • Water active sites at least three times daily. (Locations where grading is to occur will be thoroughly watered prior to earthmoving.) La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-6 August 2016 .•. ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY • Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials, or maintain at least 0.6 meters (2 feet) of freeboard (vertical space between the top of the load and top of the trailer) in accordance with the requirements of California Vehicle Code section 23114. • Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour (mph) or less. • Suspension of all grading activities when wind speeds (including instantaneous wind gusts) exceed 25 mph. • Bumper strips or similar best management practices shall be provided where vehicles enter and exit the construction site onto paved roads or wash off trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip. • Replanting disturbed areas as soon as practical. • During all construction activities, construction contractors shall sweep on -site and off -site streets if silt is carried to adjacent public thoroughfares, to reduce the amount of particulate matter on public streets. All sweepers shall be compliant with SCAQMD Rule 1186.1, Less Polluting Sweepers. SCAQMD Rule 403.1 is supplemental to Rule 403 requirements and applies only to fugitive dust sources in the Coachella Valley. General Requirements of 403.1 (1) Any person who is responsible for any active operation, open storage pile, or disturbed surface area, and who seeks an exemption pursuant to Rule 403, paragraph (g)(2) shall be required to determine when wind speed conditions exceed 25 miles per hour. The wind speed determination shall be based on either District forecasts or through use of an on -site anemometer as described in subdivision (g). (2) Any person involved in active operations in the Coachella Valley Blowsand Zone shall stabilize new man-made deposits of bulk material within 24 hours of making such bulk material deposits. Stabilization procedures shall include one or more of the following: (A) Application of water to at least 70 percent of the surface area of any bulk material deposits at least 3 times for each day that there is evidence of wind driven fugitive dust; or (B) Application of chemical stabilizers in sufficient concentration so as to maintain a stabilized surface for a period of at least 6 months; or Installation of wind breaks of such design so as to reduce maximum wind gusts to less than 25 miles per hour in the area of the bulk material deposits. (3) Any person involved in active operations in the Coachella Valley Blowsand Zone shall stabilize new deposits of bulk material originating from off -site undisturbed natural desert areas within 72 hours. Stabilization procedures shall include one or more of the following: Application of water to at least 70 percent of the surface area of any bulk material deposits at least 3 times for each day that there is evidence of wind driven fugitive dust; or (B) Application La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-7 August 2016 693 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY of chemical stabilizers in sufficient concentration so as to maintain a stabilized surface for a period of at least six months. (4) A person who conducts or authorizes the conducting of an active operation shall implement at least one of the control actions specified in Rule 403, Table 2 for the source category "Inactive Disturbed Surface Areas" to minimize wind driven fugitive dust from disturbed surface areas at such time when active operations have ceased for a period of at least 20 days. (5) Any person involved in agricultural tilling or soil mulching activities shall cease such activities when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour. The wind speed determination shall be based on either District forecasts or through use of an on -site anemometer as described in subdivision (g). Fugitive Dust Control Plan and Other Requirements for Construction Projects/Earth-Moving Activities (1) Any person who conducts or authorizes the conducting of an active operation with a disturbed surface area of more than 5,000 square feet shall not initiate any earth -moving activities unless a fugitive dust control plan is prepared and approved by the Executive Officer in accordance with the requirements of subdivision (f) and the Rule 403.1 Implementation Handbook. These provisions shall not apply to active operations exempted by paragraph (i)(4). (2) Any operator required to submit a fugitive dust control plan under paragraph (e)(1) shall maintain a complete copy of the approved fugitive dust control plan on -site in a conspicuous place at all times and the fugitive dust control plan must be provided upon request. (3) Any operator required to submit a fugitive dust control plan under paragraph (e)(1) shall install and maintain signage with project contact information that meets the minimum standards of the Rule 403.1 Implementation Handbook prior to initiating any type of earth -moving activities. (4) Any operator required to submit a fugitive dust control plan under paragraph (e)(1) for a project with a disturbed surface area of 50 or more acres shall have an Dust Control Supervisor that: (A) is employed by or contracted with the property owner or developer; and (B) is on -site or is available to be on -site within 30 minutes of initial contact; and (C) has the authority to expeditiously employ sufficient dust mitigation measures to ensure compliance with all Rule 403 and 403.1 requirements; and (D) has completed the AQMD Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control Class and has been issued a valid Certificate of Completion for the class. (5) Failure to comply with any of the provisions of an approved fugitive dust control plan shall be a violation of this rule. SCAQMD Rule 445 prohibits permanently installed wood burning devices in any new development. A wood burning device means any fireplace, wood burning heater, or pellet -fueled wood heater, or any similarly enclosed, permanently installed, indoor or outdoor device burning any solid fuel for aesthetic or space -heating purposes, which has a heat output of less than one million British thermal units per hour. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-8 August 2016 694 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY SCAQMD Rule 481 applies to all spray painting and spray coating operations and equipment. The rule states that a person shall not use or operate any spray painting or spray coating equipment without implementing specific requirements. SCAQMD Rule 1108 governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of asphalt and limits the volatile organic compound (VOC) content in asphalt used in the South Coast Air Basin. This rule regulates the VOC content of asphalt used during construction. Therefore, all asphalt used during construction of the project must comply with SCAQMD Rule 1108. SCAQMD Rule 1113 governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of architectural coatings and limits the VOC content in paints and paint solvents. This rule regulates the VOC content of paints available during construction. Therefore, all paints and solvents used during construction and operation of the project must comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113. SCAQMD Rule 1143 governs the manufacture, sale, and use of paint thinners and solvents used in thinning of coating materials, cleaning of coating application equipment, and other solvent cleaning operations by limiting their VOC content. This rule regulates the VOC content of solvents used during construction. Solvents used during the construction phase must comply with this rule. SCAQMD Rule 1186 limits the presence of fugitive dust on paved and unpaved roads and sets certification protocols and requirements for street sweepers that are under contract to provide sweeping services to any federal, state, county, agency or special district such as water, air, sanitation, transit, or school district. SCAQMD Rule 1303 governs the permitting of re -located or new major emission sources, requiring Best Available Control Measures and setting significance limits for PM10 among other pollutants. SCAQMD Rule 1401, New Source Review of Toxic Air Contaminants, specifies limits for maximum individual cancer risk, cancer burden, and non -cancer acute and chronic hazard index from new units, relocations, or modifications to existing units, which emit toxic air contaminants. SCAQMD Rule 2202, On -Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options, is to provide employers with a menu of options to reduce mobile source emissions generated from employee commutes, to comply with federal and state Clean Air Act requirements, Health & Safety Code Section 40458, and Section 182(d)(1)(B) of the federal Clean Air Act. It applies to any employer who employs 250 or more employees on a full or part-time basis at a worksite for a consecutive six-month period. In order to assist local agencies with direction on GHG emissions, the SCAQMD organized a working group and adopted Rules 2700, 2701, 2702, and 3002 which are discussed in Section 5.6, Greenhouse Gas Emissions. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-9 August 2016 695 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY Southern California Association of Governments SCAG is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino and Imperial counties and addresses regional issues relating to transportation, the economy, community development and the environment. SCAG is the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the majority of the southern California region and is the largest MPO in the nation. With respect to air quality planning, SCAG has prepared the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP), which addresses regional development and growth forecasts. These plans form the basis for the land use and transportation components of the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), which are utilized in the preparation of air quality forecasts and in the consistency analysis included in the AQMP. The RTP, RTIP, and AQMP are based on land use projections originating within City and County General Plans. Local — City of La Quinta Local jurisdictions, such as the City of La Quinta, have the authority and responsibility to reduce air pollution through their police power and decision -making authority. Specifically, the City is responsible for the assessment and mitigation of air emissions resulting from its land use decisions. The City is also responsible for the implementation of transportation control measures as outlined in the 2007 and 2012 AQMP. Examples of such measures include bus turnouts, energy -efficient streetlights, and synchronized traffic signals. In accordance with CEQA requirements and the CEQA review process, the City assesses the air quality impacts of new development projects, requires mitigation of potentially significant air quality impacts by conditioning discretionary permits, and monitors and enforces implementation of such mitigation. In accordance with the CEQA requirements, the City does not, however, have the expertise to develop plans, programs, procedures, and methodologies to ensure that air quality within the City and region will meet Federal and State standards. Instead, the City relies on the expertise of the SCAQMD and utilizes the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook as the guidance document for the environmental review of plans and development proposals within its jurisdiction. The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code includes Chapter 6.16, Fugitive Dust Control, which establishes the minimum requirements for construction and demolition activities and other specified sources in order to reduce man-made fugitive dust and related PM10 emissions. Performance standards and test methods for determining the severity of emissions and controlling fugitive dust are based on the Coachella Valley Dust Control Handbook. The preparation and implementation of a PM10 Fugitive Dust Control Plan applies to any project that would disturb more than 5,000 square feet. Criteria Pollutants The following air pollutants are collectively known as criteria air pollutants and are defined as those La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-10 August 2016 .•. ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY pollutants for which established air quality standards have been adopted by federal and state governments. The following provides a summary description of each criteria pollutant: Ozone (03) Ozone is a gas formed when byproducts of the internal combustion engine and other urban processes, particularly nitrogen oxide (NOX) and volatile organic compounds (VOC), react in the presence of ultraviolet sunlight. It is a pungent, colorless, toxic gas commonly referred to as smog. Carbon monoxide (CO) Carbon monoxide is produced from the partial combustion of fossil fuels. EPA estimates that 85%- 95% of all CO emissions come from motor vehicle exhaust. Carbon monoxide contributes to the production of methane, ozone, and carbon dioxide. It is a colorless, odorless, and tasteless toxic gas that at high concentrations can contribute to heart disease, anemia, and impaired psychological behavior. Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Nitric oxide (NO) and Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) are the primary oxides of nitrogen that are considered criteria pollutants. NOX emissions are byproducts from the operation of motor vehicles, power plants, and off -road equipment. Short-term exposure to nitrogen dioxide can result in airway constriction, diminished lung capacity, and is highly toxic by inhalation. Sulfur Oxide (SOX) Sulfur oxides occur naturally from volcanic activity, and are generated as a result of various industrial processes. The most common sulfur oxide compound is Sulfur dioxide (S02), which results from the combustion of high -sulfur content fuels, such as coal and petroleum. Sources include motor vehicle fuel combustion, fossil fuel power plants, chemical manufacturing plants, and sulfur recovery plants. Sulfur dioxide acts as an acid, can result in the formation of acid rain, and is a colorless, odorous gas. Particulate Matter Particulate matter of ten microns or smaller in diameter are referred to as PMlo, whereas PM2.5 consists of particles smaller than 2.5 microns. Particulate matter (PM) may be from soil and dust, soot and smoke, or aerosols, and is a byproduct of fuel combustion, tire wear, and wind erosion. Particles less than ten microns in diameter can enter the throat, nose, and lungs. Fine particulate matter poses a significant threat to public health and can cause increased respiratory infections, asthma attacks, and lung cancer. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-11 August 2016 697 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY Lead (Pb) Lead occurs in the atmosphere from the manufacturing of batteries, paint, ink, and ammunition. Excessive exposure to airborne lead can lead to anemia, kidney disease, gastrointestinal dysfunction, and neuromuscular and neurological disorders. Volatile Organic Compounds Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) are also known as Reactive Organic Gas (ROG). This class of pollutants have no state or federal ambient air quality standards and is not classified as a criteria pollutant, however the compounds are regulated because they are responsible for contributing to the formation of ozone. They also contribute to higher PM10 levels because they transform into organic aerosols when released into the atmosphere. Toxic Air Contaminants In addition to the above -listed criteria pollutants, toxic air contaminants (TACs) are another group of pollutants of concern. Sources of toxic air contaminants include industrial processes such as petroleum refining and chrome plating operations, commercial operations such as gasoline stations and dry cleaners, and motor vehicle exhaust. Cars and trucks release at least forty different toxic air contaminants. The most important of these toxic air contaminants, in terms of health risk, are diesel particulates, benzene, formaldehyde, 1,3-butadiene, and acetaldehyde. Public exposure to toxic air contaminants can result from emissions from normal operations as well as from accidental releases. Health effects of toxic air contaminants include cancer, birth defects, neurological damage, and death. Toxic air contaminants are less pervasive in the urban atmosphere than criteria air pollutants, however they are linked to short-term (acute) or long-term (chronic or carcinogenic) adverse human health effects. There are hundreds of different types of toxic air contaminants with varying degrees of toxicity. Sources of toxic air contaminants include industrial processes, commercial operations (e.g., gasoline stations and dry cleaners), and motor vehicle exhaust. According to the 2005 California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality, the majority of the estimated health risk from toxic air contaminants can be attributed to relatively few compounds, the most important of which is diesel particulate matter (DPM). Diesel particulate matter is a subset of PM2.5 because the size of diesel particles is typically 2.5 microns and smaller. The identification of diesel particulate matter as a toxic air contaminant in 1998 led the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to adopt the Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel -fueled Engines and Vehicles in September 2000. The plan's goals are a 75-percent reduction in diesel particulate matter by 2010 and an 85-percent reduction by 2020 from the 2000 baseline. Diesel engines emit a complex mixture of air pollutants, composed of gaseous and solid material. The visible emissions in diesel exhaust are known as particulate matter or PM, which includes carbon particles or "soot." Diesel exhaust also contains a variety of harmful gases and over 40 other cancer -causing substances. California's identification of diesel particulate matter as a toxic air contaminant was based on its La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-12 August 2016 .•: ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY potential to cause cancer, premature deaths, and other health problems. Exposure to diesel particulate matter is a health hazard, particularly to children whose lungs are still developing and the elderly who may have other serious health problems. Overall, diesel engine emissions are responsible for the majority of California's potential airborne cancer risk from combustion sources. Asbestos Asbestos is listed as a TAC by the ARB and as a Hazardous Air Pollutant by the EPA. Asbestos occurs naturally in mineral formations and crushing or breaking these rocks, through construction or other means, can release asbestiform fibers into the air. Asbestos emissions can result from the sale or use of asbestos -containing materials, road surfacing with such materials, grading activities, and surface mining. The risk of disease is dependent upon the intensity and duration of exposure. When inhaled, asbestos fibers may remain in the lungs and with time may be linked to such diseases as asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma. Naturally occurring asbestos is not present in Riverside County. The nearest likely locations of naturally occurring asbestos, as identified in the General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology, is located in Santa Barbara County. Due to the distance to the nearest natural occurrences of asbestos, the Village Build -out Plan is not likely to contain asbestos. Monitored Air Quality The air quality at any site is dependent on the regional air quality and local pollutant sources. Regional air quality is determined by the release of pollutants throughout the air basin. Estimates of the existing emissions in the Basin provided in the Final2012 Air Quality Management Plan, prepared by SCAQMD (December, 2012) indicate that collectively, mobile sources account for 59 percent of the VOC, 88 percent of the NOX emissions and 40 percent of directly emitted PM2.5, with another 10 percent of PM2.5from road dust. The EPA and the ARB designate air basins where ambient air quality standards are exceeded as "nonattainment" areas. If standards are met, the area is designated as an "attainment" area. If there is inadequate or inconclusive data to make a definitive attainment designation, they are considered "unclassified." National nonattainment areas are further designated as marginal, moderate, serious, severe, or extreme as a function of deviation from standards. Each standard has a different definition, or 'form' of what constitutes attainment, based on specific air quality statistics. For example, the Federal 8-hour CO standard is not to be exceeded more than once per year; therefore, an area is in attainment of the CO standard if no more than one 8-hour ambient air monitoring value exceeds the threshold per year. In contrast, the Federal annual PM2.5 standard is met if the three-year average of the annual average PM2.5 concentration is less than or equal to the standard. (Refer to Table 5.2-2, Salton Sea Air Basin Attainment Status). La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-13 August 2016 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY Local air quality can be evaluated by reviewing relevant air pollution concentrations near the project area. For evaluation purposes, the SCAQMD has divided the District into 36 Source Receptor Areas (SRAs), operating monitoring stations in most of the areas. These SRAs are designated to provide a general representation of the local meteorological, terrain, and air quality conditions within the particular geographical area. The Village Build -out Plan is within Source Receptor Area 30. SCAQMD operates two air monitoring stations in SRA 30, one in Indio, approximately 5.21 miles northeast of the Village (Indio Station) and the other in Palm Springs, approximately 18.45 miles northwest of the Village (Palm Springs Station). Table 5.2-3, Air Quality Monitoring Summary, summarizes 2012 through 2014 published monitoring data, which is the most recent 3-year period available. The data shows that during the past few years, the project area has exceeded the ozone and PM10 standards. However, it should be noted that due to the air monitoring station distance from the project site, recorded air pollution levels at the air monitoring station reflect with varying degrees of accuracy, local air quality conditions at the project site. Ozone During the 2012 to 2014 monitoring period, the State 1-hour concentration standard for ozone has been exceeded two days each year at the Indio Station. The State 8-hour ozone standard has been exceeded between 30 and 45 days each year over the past three years at the Indio Station. The Federal 8-hour ozone standard was exceeded between 10 and 24 days each year over the past three years at the Indio Station. Ozone is a secondary pollutant as it is not directly emitted. Ozone is the result of chemical reactions between other pollutants, most importantly hydrocarbons and NO2, which occur only in the presence of bright sunlight. Pollutants emitted from upwind cities react during transport downwind to produce the oxidant concentrations experienced in the area. Many areas of the SCAQMD contribute to the ozone levels experienced at the monitoring station, with the more significant areas being those directly upwind. Carbon Monoxide CO is another important pollutant that is due mainly to motor vehicles. The Palm Springs Station did not record an exceedance of the state or federal 1-hour or 8-hour CO standards for the last three years. Nitrogen Dioxide The Palm Springs Station did not record an exceedance of the State or Federal NO2 standards for the last three years. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-14 August 2016 700 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY Particulate Matter According to the EPA, some people are much more sensitive than others to breathing fine particles (PM10 and PM2.5). People with influenza, chronic respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and the elderly may suffer worsening illness and premature death due to breathing these fine particles. People with bronchitis can expect aggravated symptoms from breathing in fine particles. Children may experience decline in lung function due to breathing in PM10 and PM2.5. Table 5.2-3 Air Quality Monitoring Summary Year Pollutant (Standard)' 2012 2013 2014 Ozone: Maximum 1-Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.102 0.105 0.095 Days > CAAQS (0.09 ppm) 2 2 2 Maximum 8-Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.090 0.087 0.091 Days > NAAQS (0.08 ppm) 24 18 10 Days > CAAQS (0.070 ppm) 45 38 30 Carbon Monoxide:' Maximum 8-Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.45 Days > CAAQS (9 ppm) 0 0 0 Days > NAAQS (9 ppm) 0 0 0 Nitrogen Dioxide:' Annual Average (ppm) 0.007 0.007 1-Hour 98th Percentile 0.0393 0.0388 0.0412 Maximum 1-Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.045 0.052 0.046 Days > CAAQS (0.18 ppm) 0 0 0 Inhalable Particulates (PM10): Maximum 24-Hour Concentration (µg/m3) 270.6 255.2 322.3 Days > NAAQS (150 µg/m3) 2 3 6 Days > CAAQS (50 µg/m3) 7 14 15 Annual Average (4g/m3) 33.6 37.5 43.5 Ultra -Fine Particulates (PM2.5): Maximum 24-Hour Concentration (µg/m3) 18.4 25.8 26.5 Days > NAAQS (35 µg/m3) 0 0 0 Annual Average (µg/m3) 7.6 8.3 8.3 Source: Air Quality & Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, Table 5, Kunzman Associates, March 2016 Notes: 1. CAAQS = California Ambient Air Quality Standard; NAAQS = National Ambient Air Quality Standard; ppm = parts per million 2. Data from Palm Springs station *means there was insufficient data available to determine value La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-15 August 2016 701 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY Other groups considered sensitive are smokers and people who cannot breathe well through their noses. Exercising athletes are also considered sensitive, because many breathe through their mouths during exercise. The Indio Station did not record an exceedance of the Federal PM2.5standards during the most recent three year period. However, the Indio Station did record exceedances of the federal PM10 standards between two and six days during the most recent three year period; as well as the State PM10 standards which were exceeded between seven and 15 days during the same three year period. Air Quality Standards Regional Air Quality Many air quality impacts that derive from dispersed mobile sources, which are the dominant pollution generators in the basin, often occur hours later and miles away after photochemical processes have converted primary exhaust pollutants into secondary contaminants such as ozone. The incremental regional air quality impact of an individual project is generally very small and difficult to measure. Therefore, the SCAQMD has developed significance thresholds based on the volume of pollution emitted rather than on actual ambient air quality because the direct air quality impact of a project is not quantifiable on a regional scale. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that any project in the South Coast Air Basin with daily emissions that exceed any of the identified significance thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact. For the purposes to this air quality impact analysis, a regional air quality impact would be considered significant if emissions exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds identified in Table 5.2-4, SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds for Coachella Valley. Localized Air Quality Project -related construction air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the South Coast Air Basin. In order to assess local air quality impacts the SCAQMD has developed Localized Significant Thresholds (LSTs) to assess the project - related air emissions in the project vicinity. The SCAQMD has also provided Final Localized Significant Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology), June 2003, which details the methodology to analyze local air emission impacts. The Localized Significant Threshold Methodology found that the primary emissions of concern are NO2, CO, PM1o, and PM2.5. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-16 August 2016 702 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY Table 5.2-4 SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds for Coachella Valley Mass Daily Thresholds Pollutant Construction (Ibs/day) Operation (Ibs/day) NOx 100 100 VOC 75 75 PM10 150 150 PM2.5 55 55 Sox 150 150 CO 550 550 Lead 3 3 Toxic Air Contaminants, Odor and GHG Thresholds TACs Maximum Incremental Cancer Risk >_ 10 in 1 million Cancer Burden > 0.5 excess cancer cases (in areas >_ 1 in 1 million) Chronic & Acute Hazard Index > 1.0 (project increment) Odor Project creates an odor nuisance pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 402 GHG 3,000 MT/yr CO2e for all land uses. Ambient Air Quality Standards Pollutant SCAQMD Standards NO2 -1-hour average 0.18 ppm (338 µg/m^3) PM10 -24-hour average Construction Operations 10.4 µg/m^3 2.5 ug/m^3 PM2.5 -24-hour average Construction Operations 10.4 µg/m"3 2.5 µg/m^3 S02 1-hour average 24-hour average 0.25 ppm 0.04 ppm CO 1-hour average 8-hour average 20 ppm (23,000 µg/m^3) 9 ppm (10,000 µg/m"3) Lead 30-day average Rolling 3-month average Quarterly average 1.5 µg/m^3 0.15 µg/m^3 1.5 µg/m^3 Source: Air Quality & Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, Table 6, Kunzman Associates, March 2016 Note: 1. Construction thresholds apply to both the South Coast Air Basin and Coachella Valley. For Coachella Valley, the mass daily thresholds for operation are the same as the construction thresholds. Toxic Air Contaminants According to the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook, any project that has the potential to expose the public to toxic air contaminants in excess of the following thresholds would be considered to have a significant air quality impact: • If the Maximum Incremental Cancer Risk is 10 in one million or greater; or • Toxic air contaminants from the proposed project would result in a Hazard Index increase of 1 or greater. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-17 August 2016 703 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY In order to determine if the proposed project may have a significant impact related to hazardous air pollutants (HAP), the Health Risk Assessment Guidance for analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis, (Diesel Analysis), prepared by SCAQMD, August 2003, recommends that if a proposed project is anticipated to create hazardous air pollutants through stationary sources or regular operations of diesel trucks on the project site, then the proximity of the nearest receptors to the source of the hazardous air pollutants and the toxicity of the hazardous air pollutants should be analyzed through a comprehensive facility -wide health risk assessment (HRA). This project includes a variety of specialty retail, office, and residential uses, and would not be a significant source of stationary or mobile -source TACs. Odor The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that an odor impact would occur if the proposed project creates an odor nuisance pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 402, which states: A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. The provisions of this rule do not apply to odors emanating from agricultural operations necessary for the growing of crops or the raising of fowl or animals. If the proposed project results in a violation of Rule 402 with regards to odor impacts, then the proposed project would create a significant odor impact. 5.2.3 Applicable Goals and Policies The City of La Quinta Air Quality Element contains the following air quality goals and policies that are applicable to the proposed project: GOAL AQ-1 A reduction in all air emissions generated within the City. Policy AQ-1.1 Coordinate with the South Coast Air Quality Management District to assure compliance with air quality standards. Program AQ-1.1.a: Participate in monitoring, managing, and enforcing SCAQMD rules for criteria pollutants, TACs, GHGs and all other regional air pollutants of concern. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-18 August 2016 704 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY Policy AQ-1.2 Work to reduce emissions from residential and commercial energy use by encouraging decreased consumption and increased efficiency. Policy AQ-1.3 Work to reduce emissions from mobile sources by encouraging a decrease in the number of vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled. Program AQ-1.3.d: Expand routes for golf carts and other neighborhood electric vehicles and plan for access and Recharging facilities at retail, recreational, and community centers. Program AQ-1.3.e: Expand pedestrian and bicycle routes and provide safe and convenient access to retail, recreational, and community centers. Program AQ-1.3.f. Facilitate mixed use development concepts in specific identified areas of the community to allow the combination of residential and non-residential uses, such as live -work- shop designs, as described in the Land Use Element. Program AQ-1.3.g: Where permitted by the Land Use plan, and where appropriate, encourage high density residential development within walking distance to commercial, educational and recreational opportunities. Policy AQ-1.4 Protect people and sites that are especially sensitive to airborne pollutants (sensitive receptors) from polluting point sources. Policy AQ-1.5 Ensure all construction activities minimize emissions of all air quality pollutants. Program AQ-1.5.a: All grading and ground disturbance activities shall adhere to established fugitive dust criteria. Program AQ-1.5.b: Fugitive Dust Control Plans shall be reviewed and approved for development projects. Policy AQ-1.6 Proposed development air quality emissions of criteria pollutants shall be analyzed under CEQA. 5.2.4 Project Impact Analysis The potential for air quality impacts will increase with implementation of the Village Build -out Plan due to the increase in urban activity in the project area. Air pollutants will be generated from a variety of activities occurring within the Village, including grading and construction, vehicle emissions, and La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-19 August 2016 705 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY daily operations. Emissions generated by vehicular traffic are projected to be the greatest source of air pollutants. Thresholds of Significance The following thresholds or criteria are derived from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, and are used to determine the level of potential effect. The significance determination is based on the recommended criteria set forth in Section 15064 of the CEQA Guidelines. For analysis purposes, build - out of the La Quinta Village would have a significant effect on air quality emissions if it is determined that the project will: a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors). d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. a. Consistency with Air Quality Management Plan CEQA requires a discussion of any inconsistencies between a proposed project and applicable General Plans and Regional Plans (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125). The regional plan that applies to the proposed project includes the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore, this section discusses any potential inconsistencies of the proposed project with the AQMP. The purpose of this discussion is to set forth the issues regarding consistency with the assumptions and objectives of the AQMP and discuss whether the proposed project would interfere with the region's ability to comply with federal and State air quality standards. If the decision -makers determine that the proposed project is inconsistent, the lead agency may consider project modifications or inclusion of mitigation to eliminate the inconsistency. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that, New or amended General Plan Elements (including land use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for consistency with the AQMP. Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not required A proposed project should be considered to be consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency: La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-20 August 2016 706 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY 1. Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. 2. Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP in 2012 or increments based on the year of project build -out and phase. Criterion 1 - Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations Based on the air quality modeling analysis completed for the project, short-term construction impacts will not result in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD regional and local thresholds of significance. The Air Analysis also found that, even with mitigation, long-term operations impacts will result in significant and unavoidable impacts based on the SCAQMD regional and local thresholds of significance. Therefore, the proposed project is projected to contribute to the exceedance of air pollutant concentration standards and is found to be inconsistent with the AQMP for the first criterion. Criterion 2 - Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP Consistency with the AQMP assumptions is determined by performing an analysis of the proposed project with the assumptions in the AQMP. The emphasis of this criterion is to ensure that the analyses conducted for the proposed project are based on the same forecasts as the AQMP. The 2012-2035 Regional Transportation/Sustainable Communities Strategy, prepared by SCAG, 2012, consists of three sections: Core Chapters, Ancillary Chapters, and Bridge Chapters. The Growth Management, Regional Mobility, Air Quality, Water Quality, and Hazardous Waste Management chapters constitute the Core Chapters of the document. These chapters currently respond directly to federal and State requirements placed on SCAG. Local governments are required to use these as the basis of their plans for purposes of consistency with applicable regional plans under CEQA. For this project, the City Land Use Plan defines the assumptions that are represented in the AQMP. The Village Build -out Plan project area is currently designated as Village Commercial (land uses within the Village Commercial designation include commercial, professional office, and residential uses), Neighborhood Commercial (Shopping Center), Major Community Facilities (Civic Center), and Parks and Recreation (La Quinta Community Park) in the General Plan. The Village is a mixed use project, with retail and residential uses. As it is consistent with the General Plan land use designations and with City Policy AQ-1.1 in assuring compliance with SCAQMD air quality standards, the Village Build - out Plan is not anticipated to exceed the emissions that are the basis for the AQMP assumptions for the Village area, and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the second criterion. However, based on the failure of Criterion 1 above, the Village Build -out Plan will result in an inconsistency with the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore, a significant impact will potentially occur. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-21 August 2016 707 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY b-c. Violate an Air Quality Standard and Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment Short Term Construction Construction activities associated with the proposed project would have the potential to generate air emissions, toxic air contaminant emissions, and odor impacts. Assumptions for the duration of construction of the proposed project were based on an Interim Year of 2021 and a Build -out Year of 2035. The construction activities in the Village are anticipated to include: site demolition of approximately 511,456 square feet, grading of approximately 50.94 acres, building construction of an additional 1,230 multi -family attached residential dwelling units and approximately 800,000 square feet of specialty retail uses, paving of approximately 2.55 acres (approximately five percent of the total site acreage) for on -site roadways and parking, and application of architectural coatings. The Village Build -out Plan is anticipated to start construction no sooner than Spring 2017 and be completed in the beginning of 2035. Construction -Related Regional Impacts The construction -related regional air quality impacts were analyzed for criteria pollutants. Typical emission rates from construction activities were obtained from CalEEMod Version 2013.2.2 CalEEMod is a computer model published by the SCAQMD for estimating air pollutant emissions. The CalEEMod program uses the EMFAC2011 computer program to calculate the emission rates specific for the eastern portion of Riverside County for construction -related employee vehicle trips and the OFFROAD2011 computer program to calculate emission rates for heavy truck operations. EMFAC2011 and OFFROAD2011 are computer programs generated by CARB that calculates composite emission rates for vehicles. Emission rates are reported by the program in grams per trip and grams per mile or grams per running hour. Using CaIEEMod, the peak daily air pollutant emissions during each phase were calculated and are presented below in Table 5.2-5, Regional Construction - Related Pollutant Emissions. These emissions represent the highest level of emissions for each of the construction phases in terms of air pollutant emissions with implementation of SCAMD Rules, per Mitigation Measure AQ-1. The construction emissions printouts from CaIEEMod are provided in Appendix B of the Air Quality and Global Climate Change Analysis (Appendix B). Projects in the Village Build -out Plan project area will be required to comply with existing SCAQMD rules for the reduction of fugitive dust emissions and in turn, will maintain consistency with City Program AQ-1.5.a in assuring that all ground disturbing activities adhere to established fugitive dust criteria. SCAQMD Rules 403 and 403.1 establish procedures and compliance with these rules and are achieved through application of standard best management practices in construction and operation activities, such as application of water or chemical stabilizers to disturbed soils, managing haul road dust by application of water, covering haul vehicles, restricting vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-22 August 2016 708 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY 15 mph, sweeping loose dirt from paved site access roadways, cessation of construction activity when winds exceed 25 mph and establishing a permanent and stabilizing ground cover on finished sites. In addition, any operator applying for a grading permit, or a building permit for an activity with a disturbed surface area of more than 5,000 square feet, may not initiate any earth -moving operations unless a Fugitive Dust Control Plan has been prepared pursuant to the provisions of the Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control Handbook and approved by the City. It is anticipated that all development projects in the Village will prepare the required Fugitive Dust Control Plan. SCAQMD's Rule 403 and 403.1 minimum requirements require that the best available dust control measures are used for all grading operations and include the application of water or other soil stabilizers in sufficient quantity to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes. Compliance with Rules 403 and 403.1 would require the use of water trucks during all phases where earth moving operations would occur. The phases of the construction activities which have been analyzed below are: 1) demolition, 2) grading, 3) building construction, 4) paving, and 5) application of architectural coatings. The timing and construction equipment used are available in Appendix B of the Air Quality and Global Climate Change Analysis (Appendix B). Project Impacts The construction -related pollutant emissions are shown below in Table 5.2-5, Regional Construction - Related Pollutant Emissions. Table 5.2-5 shows that none of the analyzed pollutants would exceed the regional emissions thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from construction of the proposed project. Construction -Related Toxic Air Contaminant Impacts The greatest potential for toxic air contaminant emissions would be related to diesel particulate emissions associated with heavy equipment operations during construction of the proposed project. According to SCAQMD methodology, health effects from carcinogenic air toxics are usually described in terms of "individual cancer risk." "Individual Cancer Risk" is the likelihood that a person exposed to concentrations of TACs over a 70 year lifetime will contract cancer, based on the use of standard risk -assessment methodology. Given the relatively limited number of heavy-duty construction equipment, the extended build out period and the short-term construction schedule, the Village Build -out Plan would not result in a long-term (i.e., 70 years) substantial source of TAC emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk. Participation in monitoring, managing and enforcing SCAQMD'S rules in regard to TAC emissions would assure the Village's consistency with City Program AQ-1.1.a. Therefore, no significant short-term TAC impacts are anticipated to occur during construction in the Village Build -out Plan project area. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-23 August 2016 709 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY Table 5.2-5 Regional Construction -Related Pollutant Emissions Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) Activity VOC NOx CO S02 PM10 PM2.5 Demolition On -Site' 4.05 42.70 33.89 0.04 3.03 2.12 Off-Site2 0.23 2.36 3.32 0.01 0.37 0.14 Subtotal 4.28 45.06 37.22 0.05 3.40 2.25 Grading On -Site' 5.29 59.53 42.31 0.06 5.47 3.89 Off-Site2 0.06 0.07 0.80 0.00 0.17 0.05 Subtotal 5.35 59.60 43.10 0.06 5.63 3.94 Building Construction On -Site' 2.35 20.97 17.12 0.03 1.29 1.21 Off-Site2 5.63 19.58 74.70 0.16 11.70 3.39 Subtotal 7.98 40.55 91.82 0.19 12.99 4.60 Paving On -Site' 1.38 6.98 15.52 0.03 0.32 0.32 Off-Site2 0.02 0.03 0.35 0.00 0.13 0.03 Subtotal 1.41 7.01 15.87 0.03 0.45 0.36 Architectural Coating On -Site' 39.79 0.86 1.80 0.00 0.02 0.02 Off-Site2 0.38 0.44 5.54 0.02 2.01 0.54 Subtotal 40.18 1.30 7.33 0.03 2.03 0.56 Total of Overlapping Phases' 49.56 48.85 115.03 0.25 15.47 5.52 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Thresholds? No No No No No No Source: Air Quality & Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, Table 7, Kunzman Associates, March 2016 Notes: 1. On -site emissions from equipment operated on -site that is not operated on public roads. 2. Off -site emissions from equipment operated on public roads. 3. Construction phase, paving phase and painting phase may overlap. Long Term Operation On -going operation of new and redeveloped land uses within the Village would result in a long-term increase in air quality emissions. This increase would be due to emissions from Village -generated vehicle trips and through operational emissions from on -going uses within the Village. The following section provides an analysis of potential long-term air quality impacts due to regional air quality and local air quality impacts. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-24 August 2016 710 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY Operations -Related Regional Air Quality Impacts Criteria Pollutant Analysis The operations -related criteria air quality impacts created by implementation of the Village Build -out Plan have been analyzed through use of the CaIEEMod model. The operating emissions were based on the year 2035, the Village's proposed buildout year. The operations daily emissions printouts from the CaIEEMod model are provided in Appendix B of the Air Quality and Global Climate Change Analysis. The CaIEEMod model analyzes operational emissions from mobile sources, area sources, and energy usage, which are discussed below. Mobile Sources Mobile sources include emissions from the additional vehicle miles generated from the Village Build - out Plan. Vehicle trips associated with the Village were obtained from the project's Traffic Impact Analysis (Appendix F). Reductions of 13 percent were taken for internal capture resulting in a trip generation rate of 38.56 trips per thousand square feet for retail uses and 5.77 trips per dwelling unit for residential uses. For detail, refer to CaIEEMod output comments sections in Appendix B of the Air Quality and Global Climate Change Analysis (Appendix B). Area Sources Area sources include emissions from hearths, consumer products, landscape equipment and architectural coatings. Landscape maintenance includes fuel combustion emissions from equipment such as lawn mowers, rototillers, shredders/grinders, blowers, trimmers, chain saws, and hedge trimmers, as well as air compressors, generators, and pumps. As specifics were not known about the landscaping equipment fleet, CaIEEMod defaults were used to estimate emissions from landscaping equipment. Per SCAQMD Rule 1113, as amended on June 3, 2011, the architectural coatings that would be applied after January 1, 2014 will be limited to an average of 50 grams per liter or less and the CaIEEMod model default VOC emissions have been adjusted accordingly. Also, in order to account for SCAQMD Rule 445, no wood burning stoves or fireplaces will be allowed, and the CaIEEMod defaults for such have been adjusted accordingly. No other changes were made to the default area source parameters. Energy Usage Energy usage includes emissions from the generation of electricity and natural gas used on -site. 2013 Title 24 residential standards are at least 25 percent more efficient than 2008 Title 24 Standards (used as baseline in CaIEEMod). Since long-term operational emissions are anticipated to exceed AQMP thresholds, Energy Star appliances are to be used on -site per Mitigation Measure AQ-2 and high efficiency lighting that is at least 10 percent more efficient than that required by Title 24 is to be used per Mitigation Measure AQ-3. No other changes were made to the default energy usage parameters. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-25 August 2016 711 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY Village Build -out Plan Impacts The worst -case summer or winter VOC, NO,,, CO, S02, PM1o, and PM2.5 emissions created from the Village's long-term operations have been calculated and are summarized below in Table 5.2-6, Unmitigated Regional Operational Pollutant Emissions. The data provided in Table 5.2-6 shows that for the on -going operations activities within the Village, VOC, NO,, and CO emissions would exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance. Therefore, mitigation is required to reduce impacts from VOC, NOx, and CO emissions. Mitigation Measures AQ-2 through AQ-9 are provided to reduce the operational emissions. The mitigated operational regional criteria pollutant emissions are shown below in Table 5.2-7, Mitigated Regional Operational Pollutant Emissions. Table 5.2-7 shows that even with incorporation of the aforementioned mitigation measures, VOC, NOx, and CO would still exceed the regional emissions thresholds (for detailed notes, see CalEEMod output in Appendix B of the Air Quality and Global Climate Change Analysis). Therefore, a potentially significant and unavoidable regional air quality impact would occur from operation of the Village Build -out Plan. Table 5.2-6 Unmitigated Regional Operational Pollutant Emissions Activity Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) VOc NOx c0 502 PM10 PM2.5 Area Sources' 62.93 1.17 101.32 0.01 2.05 2.03 Energy Usage 0.55 4.76 2.23 0.03 0.38 0.38 Mobile Sources3 74.20 130.27 759.37 1.94 123.84 35.29 Total Emissions 137.68 136.20 862.92 1.97 126.27 37.70 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? I Yes Yes Yes No No No Source: Air Quality & Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, Table 10, Kunzman Associates, March 2016 Notes: 1. Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. 2. Energy usage consists of emissions from generation of electricity and on -site natural gas usage. 3. Mobile sources consist of emissions from vehicles and road dust. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-26 August 2016 712 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY Table 5.2-7 Mitigated Regional Operational Pollutant Emissions Activity Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) voc NOx c0 S02 PM10 PM2.5 Area Sources' 53.62 1.17 101.32 0.01 2.05 2.03 Energy Usage 0.44 3.78 1.77 0.02 0.30 0.30 Mobile Sources3 69.69 97.9S 6S1.33 1.19 73.28 21.00 Total Emissions 123.75 102.90 754.42 1.22 1 75.63 23.34 SCAQM D Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? Yes Yes Yes No No No Source: Air Quality & Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, Table 11,Kunzman Associates, March 2016 Notes: 1. Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. 2. Energy usage consists of emissions from generation of electricity and on -site natural gas usage. 3. Mobile sources consist of emissions from vehicles and road dust. d. Expose Sensitive Receptors to Substantial Pollutant Concentrations Local Air Quality Impacts from Construction Construction -related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Salton Sea portion of the South Coast Air Basin. The proposed project has been analyzed for the potential local air quality impacts created from: construction - related fugitive dust and diesel emissions; from toxic air contaminants; and from construction -related odor impacts. SCAQMD has published a Fact Sheet for Applying ColEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds (South Coast Air Quality Management District 2011b). CaIEEMod calculates construction emissions based on the number of equipment hours and the maximum daily disturbance activity possible for each piece of equipment. In order to compare CaIEEMod reported emissions against the localized significance threshold lookup tables, the CEQA document should contain in its project design features or its mitigation measures the following parameters: 1. The off -road equipment list (including type of equipment, horsepower, and hours of operation) assumed for the day of construction activity with maximum emissions. 2. The maximum number of acres disturbed on the peak day. 3. Any emission control devices added onto off -road equipment. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-27 August 2016 713 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY 4. Specific dust suppression techniques used on the day of construction activity with maximum emissions. The CalEEMod output in Appendix B of the Air Quality and Global Climate Change Analysis (Appendix B) shows the equipment used for this analysis for each phase. As shown in Table 5.2-8, Maximum Number of Acres Disturbed Per Day, the maximum number of acres disturbed in a day would be five (5) acres. The local air quality emissions from construction were analyzed using the SCAQMD's Mass Rate LST Look -up Tables and the methodology described in Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, prepared by SCAQMD, revised July 2008. The Look -up Tables were developed by the SCAQMD in order to determine if the daily emissions of CO, NOx, PM1o, and PM2.5 from the proposed Village Build - out Plan could result in a significant impact to local air quality. The emission thresholds were calculated based on the Coachella Valley SRA 30 and a disturbance of five acres per day. According to LST Methodology, any receptor located closer than 25 meters (82 feet) shall be based on the 25 meter thresholds. The nearest sensitive receptors are the existing residential, school, and park uses located within the Village Build -out boundary. Additionally, future residential units that are developed and inhabited early -on in the Build -out Plan could be affected by air quality impacts associated with additional development and redevelopment. Therefore, the SCAQMD Look -up Tables for 25 meters was used. Table 5.2-9, Local Construction Emissions at the Nearest Receptors, shows the on -site emissions from the CalEEMod model and the LST emissions thresholds. Table 5.2-8 Maximum Number of Acres Distributed Per Day Activity Equipment Number Acres/8hr-day Total Acres Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 0.5 1 Excavators 3 0.5 1.5 Total per phase - - 2.5 Activity Equipment Number Acres/8hr-day Total Acres Site Grading Graders 1 0.5 0.5 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 0.5 0.5 Scrapers 2 1 2 Excavators 2 0.5 1 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 0.5 1 Total per phase - - 5 Source: Air Quality & Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, Table 8, Kunzman Associates, March 2016 La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-28 August 2016 714 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY Table 5.2-9 Local Construction Emissions at the Nearest Receptors Construction Phase On -Site Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Demolition 42.70 33.89 3.03 2.12 Grading 59.53 0.80 0.17 0.05 Building Construction 20.97 17.12 1.29 1.21 Paving 6.98 15.52 0.32 0.32 Architectural Coating 0.86 1.80 0.02 0.02 Total 131.04 69.13 4.83 3.72 SCAQMD Thresholds' 304 2,292 14 8 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Phase II Construction Phase On -Site Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Grading 74.81 49.14 6.08 4.60 Building Construction 28.51 18.51 1.97 1.85 Paving 20.30 14.73 1.14 1.05 Architectural Coating 2.19 1.87 0.17 0.17 Total 125.81 84.25 9.36 7.67 SCAQMD Thresholds3 304 2,292 14 8 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Source: Air Quality & Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, Table 9, Kunzman Associates, March 2016 The data provided in Table 5.2-9 shows that none of the analyzed pollutants would exceed the SCAQMD LST emissions thresholds at the nearest sensitive receptors, with implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1. In turn, the project maintains consistency with City Policy AQ-1.4 in assuring protection to sensitive receptors from pollutant sources. Therefore, a less than significant local air quality impact would occur to sensitive receptors within the Village Build -out Plan. Localized Air Quality Impacts from On -Site Operations Project -related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Salton Sea portion of the South Coast Air Basin. The Village Build - out Plan has been analyzed for the potential local CO emission impacts from project -generated vehicular trips and from the potential local air quality impacts from on -site operations. The Village Build -out Plan involves the construction of residential and retail uses. The long-term emissions, as discussed previously, are primarily in the form of mobile source emissions and consumer products. According to SCAQMD LST methodology, LSTs would apply to the operational phase of a project if the project includes stationary sources, or attracts mobile sources that may spend long periods queuing and idling at the site; such as warehouse/transfer facilities. Therefore, due to the lack of stationary source emissions, no long-term LST analysis is warranted. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-29 August 2016 715 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY Local CO Emission Impacts from Project -Generated Vehicular Trips CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential local air quality impacts. Local air quality impacts can be assessed by comparing future without and with project CO levels to the State and federal CO standards which were presented in above in Section V of the Air Quality and Global Climate Change Analysis (Appendix B). To determine if the Village Build -out Plan could cause emission levels in excess of the CO standards, a sensitivity analysis is typically conducted to determine the potential for CO "hot spots" at a number of intersections in the general project vicinity. Because of reduced speeds and vehicle queuing, "hot spots" potentially can occur at high traffic volume intersections with a Level of Service E or worse. The project's Traffic Impact Analysis showed that build -out the project would generate a maximum of 37,964 trips per day. The intersection with the highest peak hour traffic volume is located at Washington Street and Avenue 48 and has a PM peak hour volume of 2,475 trips for the build -out year with Village project scenario. The 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide (1992 CO Plan) showed that an intersection which has a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day would not violate the CO standard. Therefore as the intersection with the highest traffic volume falls far short of 100,000 vehicles, no CO "hot spot" modeling was performed and no significant long-term air quality impact is anticipated to local air quality with the on -going operation of the Village Build -out Plan. e. Objectionable Odors SCAQMD recommends that odor impacts be addressed in a qualitative manner. Such an analysis should determine whether the project would result in excessive nuisance odors, as defined under the California Code of Regulations and Section 41700 of the California Health and Safety Code, and thus would constitute a public nuisance related to air quality. Land uses typically considered to be associated with odors include wastewater treatment facilities, waste -disposal facilities, or agricultural operations. The Build -out Plan does not contain land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable odors. Diesel exhaust and VOCs would be emitted during construction development within the Village, which are objectionable to some; however, emissions would disperse rapidly from the Village Build -out area and therefore should not reach an objectionable level at the nearest sensitive receptors. 5.2.5 Cumulative Impacts Cumulative projects include local development as well as general growth within the Village Build -out area. However, as with most development, the greatest source of emissions is from mobile sources, La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-30 August 2016 716 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY which travel well out of the local area. Therefore, from an air quality standpoint, the cumulative analysis would extend beyond any local projects, and when wind patterns are considered, would cover an even larger area. Accordingly, the cumulative analysis for the Village's air quality must be generic by nature. The project area is out of attainment for both ozone and particulate matter (PM1o). Construction and operation of cumulative projects will further degrade the local air quality, as well as the air quality of the Salton Sea portion of the South Coast Air Basin. The greatest cumulative impact on air quality will be the incremental addition of pollutants mainly from increased traffic from residential and commercial development, and the use of heavy equipment and trucks associated with the construction of these projects. Air quality will be temporarily degraded during construction activities that occur separately or simultaneously. In accordance with the SCAQMD methodology, projects that do not exceed the SCAQMD criteria or can be mitigated to less than criteria levels are not significant and do not add to the overall cumulative impact. However, the Air Quality Analysis also found that, even with mitigation, long-term operation of the proposed project is projected to contribute to the exceedance of air pollutant concentration standards and is found to be inconsistent with the AQMP for the first criterion. As it is consistent with the General Plan land use designations and with City Policy AQ-1.1 in assuring compliance with SCAQMD air quality standards, the Village Build -out Plan is not anticipated to exceed the emissions that are the basis for the AQMP assumptions for the Village area, and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the second criterion. However, based on the failure of Criterion 1 above, the Village Build -out Plan will result in an inconsistency with the SCAQMD AQMP, resulting in a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact. 5.2.6 Mitigation Measures Construction Measures AQ-1 All development projects in the project area must adhere to SCAQMD Rules (see Section 5.2, Air Quality pp. 5.2-6 through 5.2-10 for a list of the applicable rules), for the control of fugitive dust, for the maintenance of construction vehicles and equipment, and for the use of reduced VOC asphalt, architectural coatings and solvents. Operational Measures AQ-2 Project applicants shall require that ENERGY STAR -compliant appliances are installed where appliances are required on -site. AQ-3 Project applicants shall include high -efficiency lighting that is at least 10 percent more efficient than standard lighting. AQ-4 The City shall ensure compliance with SCAQMD Rule 1186 (limits fugitive dust on paved and unpaved roads and sets certification protocols and requirements for street sweepers) La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-31 August 2016 717 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY and 2202 (provides employers of 250 or more employees with a menu of options to reduce mobile source emissions generated by employee commutes), during long term operations in the Village. AQ-5 Project applicants shall provide sidewalks within each project boundary and along off -site roadway improvements. AQ-6 All project applicants shall ensure that new and/or remodeled buildings meet or exceed California Building Code Energy Efficiency Standards. AQ-7 All project applicants shall require that all faucets, toilets and showers installed in proposed structures utilize low -flow fixtures that would reduce indoor water demand by 20 percent per CalGreen Standards or more stringent standards if in place at the time development occurs. AQ-8 Project applicants shall implement recycling programs that reduce waste to landfills by a minimum of 75 percent or more stringent standards if in place at the time development occurs. AQ-9 To the extent feasible, project applicants shall use paints and coatings with a VOC content lower than SCAQMD Rule 1113 requires or more stringent standards if in place at the time development occurs, for application to surfaces of residential dwelling units and commercial units within project boundaries. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting A. Building and landscape plans shall be reviewed for energy efficiency and soil stabilization. Landscapers and landscape -related businesses shall be required to show proof of completion of the CVAG' Landscaper Certification Source. Responsible Parties: Public Works, Engineering, Planning Division, and Building Department. B. A report of air quality complaints and identified problems shall be provided in the annual review of the General Plan. Responsible Parties: Public Works, Code Compliance and Planning Division, and SCAQMD. C. The City shall conduct review and prepare conditions of approval for all grading and development permits, as well as required dust control plans to assure that appropriate methods and technologies are in place to minimize the emissions of pollutants from the development activities. Responsible Parties: Public Works, Engineering, Planning Division, and Building Department. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-32 August 2016 718 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY 5.2.7 Level of Significance after Mitigation The Air Quality analysis found that at the local level, within the project area, construction -related air quality impacts could be reduced to less than significant levels, through compliance with SCAQMD rules for the control of fugitive dust, for the maintenance of construction vehicles and equipment, and for the use of reduced VOC paints and solvents. However, despite implementation of mitigation measures for air emissions, significant unavoidable impacts will occur in regard to the project's contribution to the exceedance of air pollutant concentration (Criterion 1) and in exceedance with regional emissions thresholds during long term operation of land uses in the Village. The La Quinta General Plan 2035 Program EIR evaluated future conditions 20 years from now as the City builds out with a variety of residential and non-residential land uses. The Program EIR evaluated this scenario which included the Village area, although the Build -out Plan identifies a greater density and intensity of land uses in the Village than what was evaluated in the Program EIR. Still, the findings of the Program EIR were that air pollutants would be generated from a variety of activities, including vehicle emissions, and daily operations. Emissions generated by vehicular traffic are projected to be the greatest source of air pollutants. The use of natural gas and electricity for operation of existing and new buildings and structures will also result in the emission of air pollutants. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted with the adoption of the General Plan. Overriding considerations 3 and 4 specifically apply to Air Quality as follows: 3. Impacts identified as significant are generally associated with normal growth and progress and would be much more severe without implementation of the proposed General Plan update. 4. Implementation of the General Plan update will further enhance the quality of life necessary to attract new residents, businesses and visitors to the City, and will generally promote increased investment and development, jobs associated with new and/or expanded construction, and the provision of public services and facilities for a larger population base, and further economic development within the City. The La Quinta Village EIR will utilize these overriding conditions from the General Plan EIR. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-33 August 2016 719 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.2 AIR QUALITY This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR Page 5.2-34 August 2016 720 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 5.3 Biological Resources 5.3.1 Introduction This section discusses the biological resources in the La Quinta Village area, and assesses impacts on these resources from future growth and development brought on by the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan. It also provides mitigation measures to reduce impacts to important biological resources. Sources used in the preparation are included in Chapter 9, References. 5.3.2 Existing Conditions The following discussion is based on the findings of the Biological Resources Study prepared by AMEC Earth and Environmental for the La Quinta General Plan Update 2035. This Report is included as Appendix C of the La Quinta General Plan EIR. Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta is located in a natural environment that displays substantial variation, including elevations ranging from 190 feet below sea level southeast of the City, to over 1,700 feet above sea level in the foothills of the Santa Rosa Mountains. Most of the City occurs on the Valley floor with a pocket of development referred to as the La Quinta Cove that reaches into the lower elevations of the foothills. The region is characterized by hot, dry summers and mild winters, with a monsoon condition occurring in mid to late summer. This condition often results in intense thunderstorms that can result in several inches of rain falling in a short period of time (hours), often resulting in flash flooding. Soil types and the natural habitats that can be supported in the City are affected by these conditions. Indio Very Fine Sandy Loam, Indio Fine Sandy Loam, Myoma Fine Sand, Gilman Fine Sandy Loam are all present throughout the City. These are fine soils that allow rapid permeability and are made up of both alluvial material associated with flooding, and lacustrine deposits associated with both the historic and ancient Lake Cahuilla. There are no naturally occurring habitats within the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan area as most of the area is urban and built up. There are vacant lots sporadically throughout the project area that could allow for some natural habitat to re-establish, but most of the vacant sites have been cleared and graded. Vegetation that does occur is primarily comprised of non-native ornamental plants introduced by developers and homeowners, similar to surrounding development in the City. Natural Communities Several natural vegetation communities, such as Stabilized Shielded Sand Fields, Sonoran Creosote Bush Scrub, Sonoran Mixed Woody and Succulent Scrub, Desert Drywash Woodland, and Desert Saltbush Scrub occur within the City of La Quinta, but are not located within the Village area. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR 5.3-1 August 2016 721 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Common Species There are primarily two categories of habitat associated with wildlife common to the City of La Quinta. The most prevalent consists of the very disturbed and fragmented patchwork of remnant sand fields, saltbush scrub, weedy (ruderal), agricultural, and residential/recreational development. Such properties occur in the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area. Common species in this environment are those that are capable of surviving in ruderal plant communities or near residential, commercial, agricultural, and golf course developments. Another habitat category is comprised of native, less altered habitats where the Santa Rosas and associated alluvial fans and canyons overlap in the western and southern portions of the City. These habitats are not present within the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan project area due to urban development. The City of La Quinta is also home to or is utilized by a wide variety of common bird species. Non- resident bird species may migrate through the area or utilize it for breeding or nesting only. Certain species nest elsewhere but over -winter in the City, while others species permanently reside in La Quinta. Verdin, Abert's Towhee, Black -Tailed Gnatcatcher, Gambel's Quail, Mourning Dove and Ladder -Backed Woodpecker use Desert Dry Wash Woodlands and wash habitats containing mixed shrub and tree habitat that provides primary nesting habitat. Other nesting sites include shrubs, ground surfaces and animal burrows within Creosote Bush, Saltbush and Woody Scrub communities. Landscaping within residential and/or recreational areas, as well as agricultural plantings, especially date palm groves, also provide suitable nesting habitat. Raptors and common Ravens utilize cliff faces, rock outcrops and hillsides located in mountainous areas which are not found within the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan project area. Black -Throated Sparrow, Horned Lark, Loggerhead Shrike and Say's Phoebe characteristically utilize creosote bush, saltbush, and ruderal scrub communities within the City. A variety of songbird species use both desert riparian and scrub habitats in the winter months only; these include the Yellow-Rumped Warbler, White - Crowned Sparrow, Blue -Gray Gnatcatcher and Ruby -Crowned Kinglet. These and other common species are not designated species of concern, however, most of them are protected by the provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). The MBTA prohibits disturbing nests, eggs, and incubating birds, and hatchling and fledgling birds during active nesting. All native breeding birds, (except game birds) regardless of their listing status, are protected under the MBTA. Potential impacts to breeding birds are considered significant under CEQA. Since nesting birds may occur on sites within the La Quinta Build -Out Plan project area containing trees, it is important that future projects containing suitable nesting bird habitats comply with the MBTA and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Code of Regulations 3500 and 3800 which protect nesting birds. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR 5.3-2 August 2016 722 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Numerous larger common mammal species are found in the project area, such as the Black -Tailed Jackrabbit, Desert Cottontail, Striped Skunk, Northern Raccoon, Kit Fox, and Coyote. Smaller mammals include Pocket Mice, Cactus Mouse, Kangaroo Rats, Desert Woodrat, White -Tailed Antelope Squirrel, and California Ground Squirrel. Many of these non -special status species utilize a variety of habitat types within the City. Special Status Species Species which are considered threatened or endangered under either the California or federal Endangered Species Acts are called special status species. The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), CDFG, and the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) all maintain lists of these species. Table 5.3-1, Special Status Species provides a list of special status species known to occur in the City or its Sphere of Influence. In addition to these species, habitat has been modeled for Coachella Valley Milk Vetch, Desert Tortoise and Palm Springs Pocket Mouse, although these species have not been observed in the City or its Sphere of Influence. Exhibit 5.3-1, Critical Habitat and Modeled Habitat, shows that no Special Status Species are located within the Village Build -out Plan project area. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR 5.3-3 August 2016 723 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR 5.3-4 August 2016 724 017 Legend i AMEC Burrowing Owls Sightings'03 CNDDB T• ,., Prairie Falcon Black -Tailed Gnatcher i a California Ditaxis ~ _�' •— - z Glandular Ditaxis •t}yr Peninsular Big Horned Sheep Critical Habitat / „ ? — J `— "�_ " Pal Springs Pocket Mouse }'• -4 Modeled Habitat Former Modeled Habitat C.V. Giant Sand Treader Cricket & C. V. Fringe -Toed Lizard " Modeled Habitat .4 r z { Y + Former Modeled Habitat �= Q City Limits Village Build Out Area 9 Sphere of Influence ''r�'�_ �• 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 Miks 1 nM = 4, 3331ce1 Q V. l+ - 4 •• - - F_- — it �.. --- - - _ i �T11B'.'.GiMJ,n NTY.is P6EnuN1.l4 MV. 311Jui•nE'0.lblid! - % \ ',� r N •1p1[•, M.uM v.O.♦IA'eCFe1,el NumLM>TlWX - C\+�I �• �y� _ '• TTb m.PIW Rrt GaM WYaE OyalkMK-0IeYlfUve,ol. nE ..—. ..—..—.—._—.----..— W �I�`/ y >:mpsty ta...e �i•.ro.,+»,.r.ai.r • , r ✓ f01 .. _e 4he .{VELA I.M1My •nnn M„w9 wMRgrM k. - (O ss MY M.11S Yd WR •i^1M'AE uM ' +,� -. � � �l •' •ll• S�IyT i1 -Yw Y�It lift L Al Source: La Quinta General Plan 2035 EIR, Figure III-2 El 15 The Altum Group Critical Habitat and Modeled Habitat La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 2� 3-1 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR 5.3-6 August 2016 726 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Table 5.3-1 Special Status Species Common Scientific State and Federal On -Site Name Name Habitat Local Status Status in 20131 Chaparral Sand- Abronia villosa Sandy areas; Chaparral/ CNPS List 1B.1 No Verbena var. aurita Desertdunes State: S2.1 I Glandular Ditaxis Ditaxis claryana Sandy habitats Sonoran Desert CNPS List 2.2 No scrub 0 --- 46S meters State: S1S2 California Ditaxis Ditaxisserrata Sonoran Desert Scrub CNPS List 3.2 No var. californica State: S2.2 Flat -tailed Horned Phyrnosoma Sandy habitats with adjacent State: S2 No Lizard mcallii hardpan, often sparsely CDFW: CSC vegetated, also saltbush CVMSHCP habitats Coachella Valley Umainornata Sand dunes, sand fields State: S1 Threatened No Fringe -toed Lizard CDFW: Endangered CVMSHCP Burrowing Owl Athene Burrows/abandoned State: S2 No cunicularia Foundation structures, CDFW: CSC Creosote Bush & Ruderal CVMSHCP Scrub (edges of canals/agriculture) Prairie Falcon Falco mexicanus Cliff faces (nesting), Open State: S3 No habitats for foraging CDFW: Watch list Black -tailed Polioptila Desert scrub and desert wash State: S4 No Gnatcatcher melanura woodland habitats Loggerhead Lanius Fairly common in a variety of State: S4 No Shrike ludovicianus open habitats CDFW: CSC Western Yellow Lasiurus Primarily roosts in the dead State: S3 No Bat xanthinus/ega fronds of palms, including CDFW: CSC landscape specimens CVMSHCP Pocketed Free- Nyctinomops Variety of arid habitats Desert State: S2S3 No tailed Bat femorosaccus Scrub, Palm Oasis, Desert CDFW: CSC Wash, roosts in rocky cliffs Palm Springs Xerospermophil Desert Scrub, Desert Wash, State: S1S2 Candidate No Round -tailed us tereticaudus Alkali Scrub, CDFW: CSC Ground Squirrel chlorus & levees, golf course edges CVMSHCP w/ adjacent native habitat Peninsular Oviscanadensis Lower elevations of the CVMSHCP: Endangered No Bighorn Sheep nelsoni DPS eastern Peninsular Ranges, Threatened including canyon bottoms, alluvial fans, and mountain slopes Source: Table 111-3, 2035 La Quinta General Plan 2035 La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR 5.3-7 August 2016 727 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Notes: State of California and Local Status: Endangered, Threatened, Protected, Special Concern status per the California Fish and Game Code of 2007, as well as all species protected by the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (species covered by plan listed as CVMSHCP). Federal Status: Endangered, Threatened and Candidate for listing status per the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (as amended). It is mandatory that federally listed plant species be fully considered during preparation of environmental documents pertaining to the California Environmental Quality Act or National Environmental Policy Act, or any federal authorization. California Native Plant Society listing rankings (CNPS 2010) are described as follows: List 1A: Plants (29) presumed extinct in California because they have not been seen or collected in the wild in California for many years. List 113: Plants considered rare and endangered in California and throughout their range. All of the plants constituting List 113 meet the definitions of Section 1901, Chapter 10 (Native Plant Protection Act) or Sections 2062 and 2067 (California Endangered Species Act) of the California Department of Fish and Game Code and are eligible for state listing. It is mandatory that these plant species be fully considered during preparation of environmental documents pertaining to CEQA. List 2: Plants considered rare, threatened or endangered in California but which are more common elsewhere. List 3: Plants about which more information is needed to assign them to one of the other lists. List 4: Plants of limited distribution (a "watch list") or infrequent throughout a broader area in California, their vulnerability to threat appears low at this time. Threat Rank • Seriously threatened in California (high degree/immediacy of threat) • Fairly threatened in California (moderate degree/immediacy of threat) • Not very threatened in California (low degree/immediacy of threat) State Ranks (Note: where two ranks are given (eg. S1 S2) the species' rank falls between the two ranks) S1: 5 or fewer viable occurrences or fewer than 1,000 individuals statewide and/or less than 2,000 acres S2: 6 — 20 viable occurrences or fewer than 3,000 individuals statewide and/or 2,000—10,000 acres S3: 21-100 viable occurrences or fewer than 10,000 individuals statewide and/or 10,000 — 50,000 acres S4: Greater than 100 viable occurrences statewide and/or greater than 50,000 acres, apparently secure statewide SS: Community demonstrably secure statewide Threat Ranks • Very threatened • Threatened • No current threats known Habitat Protection Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan The Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) is a joint regional planning effort of the USFWS, the CDFW, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), and the National Park Service (NPS), as well as Riverside County and most local jurisdictions within the Coachella Valley, including the City of La Quinta. The La Quinta Village Build - Out Plan project area is within the planning area for the CVMSHCP. A portion of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area lies within the City and Sphere, on lands west of the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR 5.3-8 August 2016 728 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES eastern edge of the Santa Rosa Mountains. The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area is not within a conservation area, nor is it adjacent to a designated conservation area. Because the City of La Quinta is a signatory to the CVMSHCP, development projects outside conservation areas are required to pay the prescribed mitigation fee to offset the potential impacts of the development on the natural environment and ensure the future availability of funds to purchase regional conservation lands. Regulation of Streambeds and Watercourses There are numerous washes and Streambeds in the City and Sphere. In addition to the Whitewater River, there are several smaller, mostly unnamed streams that drain from the Santa Rosa Mountains. Streambeds and washes are subject to regulation by a variety of State and federal regulatory agencies. Where streambeds and washes qualify as waters of the State, they fall under the jurisdiction of CDFW. Water bodies determined to also be waters of the U.S. fall under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE). The Whitewater River, which is the primary ephemeral stream in the Coachella Valley, runs generally northwest to southeast through the Coachella Valley. East of Washington Street, the river is called the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. The Channel qualifies as both a Water of the State and a Water of the U.S. Therefore, construction activities that may affect the Channel require consultation with both CDFW and the USACOE, and permits must be secured from both agencies. The Whitewater River is not located within the project area. Smaller streams emanating from the Santa Rosa Mountains include Bear Creek enter the City at the south end of the Cove, and the La Quinta Evacuation Channel, which extends northeasterly from the Bear Creek Channel. Such drainages constitute waters of the State and are under the jurisdiction of the CDFW. The La Quinta Channel runs north of the project area, and serves to drain portions of the Village and Cover areas. 5.3.3 Applicable Goals and Policies GOAL BIO-1 The protection and preservation of native and environmentally significant biological resources and their habitats. Policy BI0-1.1 Continue to implement the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). Program BI0-1.1.a: Building permits shall not be issued for projects required to pay the CVMSHCP local development mitigation fee until such time as the fee has been paid to the City. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR 5.3-9 August 2016 729 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Policy BI0-1.2 Where appropriate, site -specific, species -specific surveys shall be required for the seven species not covered by the MSHCP. Policy BI0-1.4 Comply with the requirements of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Program BIO-1.4.a: Throughout the City, prior to the removal of vegetation on a development site between March and August, a qualified biologist shall determine whether any bird nests or young occur on the site, and if they occur, provide mitigation measures compliant with the MBTA. Policy BI0-1.6 Native Desert plant materials should be incorporated into new development projects to the greatest extent possible. Invasive, non-native species shall be discouraged. 5.3.4 Project Impacts The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan will facilitate development of vacant land and redevelopment of several existing properties. Implementation of the Plan will result in the infill of all currently vacant properties, as well as the intensification of uses on some currently underutilized properties. Thresholds of Significance The following standards and criteria for establishing the significance of potential impacts on biological resources were derived from the CEQA guidelines. Implementation of the proposed La Quinta Village Build -out Plan would have a significant impact on biological resources if it would: a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service. c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR 5.3-10 August 2016 730 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. a. Candidate, Sensitive, or Special Status Species Plant Communities There are no federal Threatened or Endangered plant species known to occur in the project area or in the vicinity surrounding the project area, as shown in Exhibit 5.3-1. Implementation of the Build - out Plan includes the development of several vacant lots within the project area, however, these lots contain only sparse ornamental vegetation and ruderal species because these sites have been cleared and graded in the past. General Plan Goal 1310-1 addresses the protection and preservation of native and environmentally significant biological resources and their habitats. Although there are no know native or environmentally significant species in the Village Build -out Plan project area, Policy 1.6 discourages the use of invasive or non-native plants that may be detrimental to native species. Certain ornamental vegetation that is drought tolerant is appropriate as identified in the La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 8.13, Water Efficient Landscaping, which defines provisions for new and existing landscapes. Native desert plants are by nature water efficient and can be incorporated into new development projects as part of the landscape design. Invasive, non-native species are discouraged as they may be detrimental to the viability of native desert plants. The City will enforce its landscaping requirements on future projects within the Plan area. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. Invertebrates, Reptiles and Amphibians Invertebrates, reptiles and amphibians that occur in the City will be impacted by increased urbanization. These species are especially vulnerable to crushing from grading and construction activities. The Coachella Valley Fringe -Toed Lizard is the only federal listed Threatened and State listed Endangered reptile species that is thought to occur in the City. As urban development has encroached, the sandy habitat that supports this species has become increasingly compromised through the construction of roads, buildings and fences and other barriers that disrupt the natural blow sand process. Because most of the Village Build -out Plan project area is urban and none of the vacant properties display any blowsand or sand dune features, the project area does not support habitat for the Coachella Valley Fringe -Toed Lizard. The species is a covered species under the CVMSHCP, which addresses impacts to this species through payment of fees and other measures. For future projects in the Village Build -out Plan project area, payment of fees would be the extent of an applicant's requirements regarding the species. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR 5.3-11 August 2016 731 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Birds The Village Build -out Plan project area is urbanized and vacant properties have either been previously graded or disturbed by humans such that no habitat exists. Avian species that can tolerate human disturbance will likely continue to inhabit the project area, and may be attracted to newly landscaped areas. Burrowing owl is such a species. This species is covered by special survey requirements of the CVMSHCP and receives protection under California Fish and Game Code. In compliance with Mitigation Measure BIO-1, prior to development of currently vacant properties, an applicant must have a pre -construction survey performed to establish presence/absence of individuals. In addition, nesting birds are protected under the MBTA. Birds can usually escape harm's way during construction activities by flying away, but during nesting season, eggs and chicks are at risk during such activities. To avoid illegal take of nesting birds, construction activities should be conducted outside of nesting season, which is from February 1 through August 15. If timing restriction make it impossible to avoid construction activities during nesting season, developers must comply with Mitigation Measure BIO-2. Mitigation to ensure that pre -construction surveys are completed prior to land disturbance are included below in Section 5.3.5, Mitigation Measures. Implementation of mitigation measures would ensure that potential impacts to burrowing owls or other nesting migratory birds would be less than significant. Mammals Development activities may involve mass grading and clearing, resulting in the removal of vegetation and any wildlife species that may be occupying the site. A wide range of common and sensitive wildlife species occur in the City that may be affected by implementation of the Village Build -out Plan. For example, bats may roost in vacant buildings or untrimmed date palm trees, and these should be surveyed prior to disturbance. The direct and indirect impacts of continued development affect smaller mammals, including a variety of common and sensitive species. Grading and site preparation could crush burrows of some species such as the Palm Springs Round -Tailed Ground Squirrel, which is a candidate for Federal listing. However, as shown in Table 5.3-1, this species is not known to inhabit the project area. Therefore, development associated with the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan will have no impact on candidate, sensitive or special -status mammal species. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR 5.3-12 August 2016 732 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES b. Riparian Habitat There is no riparian habitat within the project area as the area is an urban desert setting. Therefore, development associated with the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan will have no impact on riparian habitat. c. Federally Protected Wetlands There are no wetland features within the project area, as the area is located in an urban desert setting. Therefore, development associated with the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan will have no impact on federally protected wetlands. d. Movement of Native Wildlife Movement of native wildlife occurs to the south and west of the Village in the mountains and open desert. The project area is developed with urban uses and is surrounded by residences, commercial areas and golf courses. Therefore, development associated with the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan will have no impact on the movement of native wildlife. e. Conflict with Local Policies or Ordinances The City has no Policy or Ordinance related to special status species. Therefore, development associated with the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan will not conflict with local ordinances pertaining to special status species. f. Habitat Conservation Plan The Village Build -out Plan project area is within the planning area for the CVMSHCP, but is not within a designated conservation area. The closest CVMSHCP conservation area to the Village is the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountain Conservation Area, approximately 1,700 feet west of the Plan boundary. Because most of the Village Build -out Plan project area is urban and any vacant properties display signs of disturbance and minimal ruderal vegetation, it is unlikely that suitable habitat for species protected under the CVMSHCP is present within the Build -out Plan project area. Nonetheless, all development proposed within the Build -out Plan area will be required to pay a mitigation fee to ensure the future availability of funds to purchase conservation land and offset potential impacts of development on the natural environment. Payment of mitigation fees would be the extent of an applicant's requirements regarding impacts to species protected under the CVMSHCP. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. 5.3.5 Cumulative Impacts Impacts to special status species are cumulative, given other development that has or may be expected to take place in the Coachella Valley. It should be noted that these impacts are addressed in the CVMSHCP, which provides mitigation for incidental take resulting from individual La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR 5.3-13 August 2016 733 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES development projects. Mitigation includes payment of per -acre mitigation fees for all new development within the CVMSHCP planning area. (See Mitigation Measure BIO-3) 5.3.6 Mitigation 13I0-1 Burrowing Owl. Prior to any land disturbance on currently vacant properties, an applicant shall have a biological survey conducted at the project site to determine presence/absence of the species. Results of the survey may determine whether focused surveys must be conducted. If the site survey determines the presence of burrowing owl, mitigation in accordance with the CDFW shall be implemented as follows: • If burrowing owls are identified as being resident on -site outside the breeding season (February 1 through August 31) they may be relocated to other sites by a permitted biologist (permitted by CDFW), as allowed in the CDFW Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (March 2012). • If an active burrow is found during the breeding season, the burrow shall be treated as a nest site and temporary fencing shall be installed at a distance from the active burrow, to be determined by the biologist, to prevent disturbance during grading or construction. Installation and removal of the fencing shall be done with a biological monitor present. 13I0-2 Nesting Bird Surveys. Removal of any appropriate vegetation located on a project site shall be conducted outside of the avian nesting season (February through August). If construction must occur during the avian nesting season, a pre -construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted within seven days prior to any ground disturbing activities. If at any time birds are found to be nesting, construction activities within 250 feet of the nest must not occur until it is determined by a qualified biologist that the nest is no longer active. 13I0-3 CVMSHCP Mitigation Fee. New development projects are required to pay the mitigation fees; even those projects located in urban areas. The most current rates (2016) are as follows (but future developments may be subject to updated fees): Dwelling Units Fee 0-8 units $1,301 per unit 8-14 units $541 per unit 14 + units $239 per unit Non -Residential Commercial/industrial $5,809 per acre La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR 5.3-14 August 2016 734 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting A. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the City shall require that all applicable biological resource mitigation actions, including payment of Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan mitigation fees by applicable projects, and compliance with applicable state and federal regulatory permits, shall be satisfied. Responsible Parties: Planning Division, Biologist, California Department of Fish and Game, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Project Developer/Consulting Biologist. 5.3.7 Level of Significance After Mitigation Payment of CVMSHCP mitigation fees and completion of surveys for avian species where required, including burrowing owls and nesting birds, will ensure that impacts to biological resources would be less than significant. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR 5.3-15 August 2016 735 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan EIR 5.3-16 August 2016 736 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES 5.4 Cultural Resources 5.4.1 Introduction This section discusses the cultural resources that may be present in the La Quinta Village Build -out project area, and assesses impacts on these resources from future growth and development associated with implementation of the Build -Out Plan. This section of the EIR was prepared by Applied Earthworks, the firm that conducted the Historical Resources Survey for the Village Build - out Plan. Therefore, their results from their survey are directly incorporated into this section. Additional sources used in the preparation of this section are included in Chapter 9, References. A cultural resource is defined as any object or specific location of past human activity, occupation, or use, identifiable through historical documentation, inventory, or oral evidence. Cultural resources can be separated into three categories: archaeological, built environment, and traditional cultural resources. Archaeological resources include both historical and prehistoric remains of human activity. Historic - period resources can consist of historic structures, structural ruins (such as foundation remnants), and sites (such as artifact refuse deposits and artifact -filled features). Prehistoric resources can include lithic artifact or ceramic scatters, quarries, habitation sites, temporary camps/rock rings, ceremonial sites, and trails. Built -environment resources consist of standing historic buildings, structures, (such as monuments, canals, historic roads and trails, bridges, and ditches) and objects. A traditional cultural resource or property (TCP) can include Native American sacred sites (such as rock art sites and cemeteries) and traditional resources, such as gathering locations, which are important for maintaining the cultural traditions of any group. 5.4.2 Existing Conditions Environmental Setting A comprehensive history of the La Quinta area has been documented in an official context statement developed by the City. A brief historical context was also developed by CRM Tech for use in a Citywide Historical Resources Survey Update associated with the General Plan 2035, as reproduced here. In the present-day city of La Quinta, the earliest settlement and land development activities did not occur until the turn of the century. By then, most of the Cahuilla villages and rancherias noted in the mid-1850s had vanished, reflecting the decline of the Cahuilla's population and prosperity during the latter half of the 19th century. Instead, the cultural landscape in the eastern Coachella Valley La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-1 August 2016 737 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES began to show unmistakable signs of Euroamerican influence, such as fences, irrigation ditches, and scattered farmsteads, along with various wagon roads and the Southern Pacific Railroad. Around 1900, a number of desert land claims and homestead claims were filed with the U.S. General Land Office (GLO) on various parcels in what is now the City of La Quinta. Although the majority of such early claims ended in failure, during the next few decades the GLO approved and patented 54 land grants to private claimants on properties in present-day La Quinta, including 26 homestead claims, 9 desert land claims, 3 railroad homestead claims, and 16 cash purchases. By the 1910s, several early ranches were in operation in La Quinta, most prominently the Manning Burkett Ranch, the John Marshall Ranch (later known as Hacienda del Gato), and the Point Happy Ranch. In 1926, La Quinta's growth was steered towards the budding resort industry in the Coachella Valley when Walter H. Morgan and his Desert Development Company began the construction of the La Quinta Hotel. Although this instantly popular and celebrated up -scale hostelry fell into receivership during the Great Depression, other developers, inspired by the success of nearby Palm Springs, continued to pursue and expand Morgan's vision of La Quinta as a resort town to rival its more famous neighbor to the west. In the early 1930s, E. S. "Harry" Kiener subdivided the Cove area in Sections 1, 12 and 13, T6S R6E, into residential lots, and began advertising the sale of completely furnished "weekend homes". The subdivision and development of the Cove area, in fact, marked the birth of La Quinta as a community. By 1941, the Cove area had essentially taken on its present shape. A large number of buildings had sprung up in the Cove, clustered predominantly in the northern half of the subdivision, north of today's Calle Chihuahua. Farther to the north, the La Quinta Hotel complex occupied a substantial portion of Section 36, T5S R6E. The rest of present-day La Quinta, lying between the Cove and the Southern Pacific Railroad, demonstrated a typical rural settlement pattern, with scattered ranch houses connected by roads that were laid out mostly along section or quarter -section lines, the most common property boundaries. Between the early 1940s and the mid-1950s, the number of buildings in the La Quinta area increased significantly, especially in the Cove area, as the entire Coachella Valley experienced rapid growth during the post-war years. In the meantime, the contrast between the different settlement patterns in the Cove area and the outlying rural area persisted, as it still does to some degree to the present day [Tang and Hogan 2006:5]. The City of La Quinta conducted two city-wide Historical Resources Surveys, which occurred in 1996-1997 and 2006; these two studies were updated in 2010 as part of the General Plan Update. From these studies, a total of 19 historic -age buildings have been identified within or immediately adjacent to the Village Build -Out Plan project area. These are presented in Table 5.4-1, Previously Identified Resources Within One City Block of the Village Build -out Plan Project Area. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-2 August 2016 738 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES Table 5.4-1 Previously Identified Resources Within One City Block of the Village Build -out Plan Project Area Address APN Description Year built Significance 51650 Avenida 770-182-003 Modern style 1941 6Z; not eligible Bermudas commercial building 51622 Avenida 773-145-006 Modern -style single- 1951 6Z; not eligible Navarro family dwelling 51592 Avenida 773-145-026 Ranch -style single- 1951 6Z; not eligible Navarro family dwelling 51116 Avenida 773-075-005 Ranch style single- 1957 6Z; not eligible Mendoza family dwelling 51412 Avenida 773-102-011 Ranch style single- 1957 6Z; not eligible Mendoza family dwelling 51371 Avenida 773-092-008 Modern -style single- 1958 6Z; not eligible Martinez family dwelling 51351 Avenida 773-103-007 Spanish Colonial 1935 5D1; eligible for local Navarro Revival single-family listing as a contributor to a dwelling thematic historic district 51411 Avenida 773-102-007 Spanish Colonial 1937 5D1; eligible for local Villa Revival/Pueblo style listing as a contributor to a single-family dwelling thematic historic district 51001 773-065-012 Spanish Colonial 1938 5D1; eligible for local Eisenhower Drive Revival single-family listing as a contributor to a dwelling thematic historic district 51453 Avenida 773-103-012 Spanish Colonial 1948 5D1; eligible for local Navarro Revival single-family listing as a contributor to a dwelling thematic historic district 51397 Avenida 773-103-009 Unidentified style 1949 5D1; eligible for local Navarro single-family listing as a contributor to a residence thematic historic district 51489 Avenida 773-092-012 Spanish -influenced 1949 5D1; eligible for local Martinez Ranch style single- listing as a contributor to a family dwelling thematic historic district 51383 Avenida 773-104-021 Ranch -style single- 1949 5D1; eligible for local Bermudas family dwelling listing as a contributor to a thematic historic district 51431 Avenida 773-103-011 Ranch -style single- 1950 5D1; eligible for local Navarro family dwelling listing as a contributor to a thematic historic district 51453 Avenida 773-092-009 Ranch -style multiple- 1950 5D1; eligible for local Martinez family dwelling listing as a contributor to a thematic historic district 78035-78039 770-152-004 Spanish Colonial 1936 5S1; individually eligible for Calle Estado Revival commercial local listing building La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-3 August 2016 739 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES Table 5.4-1 Previously Identified Resources Within One City Block of the Village Build -out Plan Project Area (Continued) Address APN Description Year built Significance 78023 Calle 770-152-001 Spanish Colonial 1930s 5S1; individually eligible for Estado Revival commercial local listing building 77885 Avenida 773-101-001 Spanish Colonial 1938 5S1; individually eligible for Montezuma Revival commercial local listing building 77895 Avenida 773-104-036 Monterey -style 1940 5S1; individually eligible for Montezuma commercial building I I local listing Source: Cultural Resources Technical Report for City of La Quinta General Plan (2010 Update), prepared by CRM Tech, July 8, 2010 Of the 19 historic age buildings, 13 have been identified by the City of La Quinta as historically significant properties, while the other six are considered not eligible for listing and hence require no further consideration. Nine of the 13 properties are single-family dwellings found eligible for local listing as contributors to the La Quinta Cove Thematic Historic District. This was based on their architectural styling, which is primarily Spanish Colonial Revival and/or Ranch, and their period of construction, which was between 1935 and 1950. These nine buildings are within the development period of the La Quinta Cove residential tract. The remaining four properties were found eligible for local listing based on their individual architectural merits, being original to the historical downtown commercial district. These four buildings are of Spanish Colonial or Monterey Revival -style architecture dating between 1936 and 1940. Regulatory Setting California Environmental Quality Act The Village Build -out Plan is subject to compliance with CEQA. Therefore, cultural resources management work conducted must comply with the CEQA Statutes and Guidelines, which directs lead agencies to first determine whether cultural resources are "historically significant." A project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. Generally, a cultural resource shall be considered "historically significant" if the resource is 50 years old or older, possesses integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and meets the requirements for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) under any one of the following criteria: 1. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage; 2. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-4 August 2016 740 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES 3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or, 4. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. (Title 14 CCR, § 15064.5) Title 7 of the La Quinta Municipal Code The City of La Quinta passed a historic preservation ordinance in 1992 with the intent and purpose to effect the protection, enhancement, and perpetuation of historic resources, landmarks, and districts that represent or reflect elements of the City's diverse cultural, social, economic, political, and architectural history, and safeguard the City's historic heritage (City of La Quinta, Title 7.02.020). The ordinance provides for the establishment of a historic resource inventory. A historic resource may be considered for inclusion in the City's historic resource inventory based on one or more of the following criteria: A. It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the City's cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering or architectural history; or B. It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state or national history; or C. It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period or method of construction, is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship or is representative of a notable work of an acclaimed builder, designer or architect; or D. It is an archaeological, paleontological, botanical, geological, topographical, ecological or geographical site which has the potential of yielding information of scientific value; or E. It is a geographically definable area possessing concentration of site, buildings, structures, improvements or objects linked historically through location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and/or association, in which the collective value of the improvements may be greater than the value of each individual improvement. (Ord. 238 § 2 (Exh. A) (part), 1993: Ord. 207 § 1 (part), 1992) The Village Build -out Plan is also subject to compliance with the City's historic preservation ordinance. The cited statutes and guidelines specify how cultural resources are to be managed in the context of projects, such as the Village Build -Out Plan. Briefly, archival and field surveys must be conducted, and identified cultural resources must be inventoried and evaluated in prescribed ways. Prehistoric and historical archaeological resources, as well as historical resources such as buildings, structures, and other built -environment features, deemed "historically significant" must be considered in project planning and development. As well, any proposed project that may impact "historically significant" cultural resources must be submitted to the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) for review and comment prior to project approval by the responsible agency and prior to construction, demolition, or other similar project impacts. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-5 August 2016 741 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) AB 52, which went into effect on July 1, 2015 requires a lead agency to consider a project's impacts on TCRs. TCRs as defined in Public Resources Code § 21074 are as follows: (a) "Tribal cultural resources" are either of the following: (1) Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either of the following: (A) Included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources. (B) Included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section 5020.1. (2) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1 for the purposes of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. (b) A cultural landscape that meets the criteria of subdivision (a) is a tribal cultural resource to the extent that the landscape is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape. (c) A historical resource described in Section 21084.1, a unique archaeological resource as defined in subdivision (g) of Section 21083.2, or a "nonunique archaeological resource" as defined in subdivision (h) of Section 21083.2 may also be a tribal cultural resource if it conforms with the criteria of subdivision (a). Under AB 52, the CEQA Lead Agency is required to Agency to begin consultation with a California Native American Tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project. Tribal consultation can be initiated once a project application is deemed complete. Once the Lead Agency has contacted necessary tribal governments, tribes have 30 days to respond with comments or requesting consultation. "Consultation" is the meaningful and timely process of seeking, discussing, and considering carefully the views of others, in a manner that is cognizant of all parties' cultural values and, where feasible, seeking agreement. Consultation between government agencies and Native American tribes shall be conducted in a way that is mutually respectful of each party's sovereignty. Consultation shall also recognize the tribes' potential needs for confidentiality with respect to places that have traditional tribal cultural significance. Consultation concludes when either: the parties agree on measures to mitigate or avoid significant impacts to TCRs or a party, in good faith and after reasonable effort, concludes that a mutual agreement cannot be reached. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-6 August 2016 742 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES Under AB 52, Tribal Cultural Resources and Consultation, if the City determines that a project may cause a substantial adverse change to a tribal cultural resource, and measures are not otherwise identified in the consultation process, new provisions in CEQA (Section 21084.3(b)) describe mitigation measures that, if determined by the lead agency to be feasible, may avoid or minimize the significant adverse impacts. These include: (1) Avoidance and preservation of the resources in place, including, but not limited to, planning and construction to avoid the resources and protect the cultural and natural context, or planning green space, parks, or other open space, to incorporate the resources with culturally appropriate protection and management criteria. (2) Treating the resource with culturally appropriate dignity taking into account the tribal cultural values and meaning of the resource, including, but not limited to, the following: (A) Protecting the cultural character and integrity of the resource (B) Protecting the traditional use of the resource (C) Protecting the confidentiality of the resource (3) Permanent conservation easements or other interests in real property, with culturally appropriate management criteria for the purposes of preserving or utilizing the resources or places. 5.4.3 General Plan Policies that Apply to the Village r;nai r•1n_1 The protection of significant archaeological, historic and paleontological resources which occur in the City. Policy CUL-1.1. All reasonable efforts should be made to identify archaeological and historic resources in the City. Program CUL- 1.1.d: The City shall update its historic inventory at a minimum of every 10 years, subject to available funding. Policy CUL-1.2. Assure that significant identified archaeological and historic resources are protected. Program CUL- 1.2.a: The City will be proactive in the protection of archaeological and historic resources in City -sponsored or assisted projects and programs. Program CUL-1.2.c: Encourage owners of qualified historic buildings to take advantage of tax credits and other programs for the preservation and restoration of historic structures. Program CUL- 1.2.d.• Continue to implement the Historic Preservation Ordinance. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-7 August 2016 743 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES 5.4.4 Project Impacts Thresholds of Significance With implementation of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan, historical resources within or near the Village area could potentially be impacted by new development or redevelopment occurring in the Village area. The thresholds analyzed in this section are derived from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, and are used to determine the level of potential effect. The significance determination is based on the recommended criteria set forth in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. For analysis purposes, build -out of the La Quinta Village would have a significant effect on cultural resources if it is determines that the project will: a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in 15064.5. b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to 15064.5. c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. The following threshold has been added to the evaluation of cultural resources to assess the potential for a project to impact Native American resources. e. Cause a substantial adverse change to Native American Resources. a. Historical Resources Impact Assessment Methodology Within the State of California there are provisions in CEQA, its Guidelines, and other provisions of the California Public Resources Code for the protection and preservation of significant cultural resources (i.e., "historical resources"). The CEQA Guidelines provide four ways in which a resource can be a "historical resource," and thus a cultural resource meriting analysis: (1) the resource has been formally determined eligible for, or listed on, the National Register of Historic Places (§5024.1(d)(1); (2) the resource is listed on the CRHR; (3) the resource is included in a local register of historical resources (pursuant to §5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code), or identified as significant in a historical resources survey (meeting the criteria in §5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code); or (4) the lead agency determines the resource is "historically significant" by assessing CRHR listing guidelines that parallel the federal criteria. (§15064.5(a)(1)-(3) of the CEQA Guidelines (as amended)). To qualify as a historical resource under (1), (2) or (4) above, the resource must also retain the integrity of its physical identity that existed during its period of significance. Integrity is La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-8 August 2016 744 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES evaluated with regard to retention of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association (14 C.C.R. 4852(c)). Direct and Indirect Effects Analysis Direct impacts to cultural resources are those associated with project development, construction, and compatibility of infill. Construction can have direct impacts on historical built -environment resources when those buildings or structures must be removed to make way for new buildings or structures or when the vibrations of construction impair the stability of historical buildings or nearby structures. New buildings or structures can have direct impacts on historical built - environment resources when the new buildings or structures are stylistically incompatible with their neighbors and the setting, or when the new buildings or structures produce a harmful effect to the materials or structural integrity of the historical built environment resources, such as emissions or vibrations. Historical built -environment resources can suffer indirect impacts when project construction creates potentially damaging noise and vibration, or the mass and scale of the new construction is incompatible and has visual impact on adjacent buildings. CEQA, however, allows for reduction of impacts. CEQA states "Generally, a project that follows the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings or the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (Weeks and Grimmer 1995), shall be considered as mitigated to a level of less than a significant impact on the historical resource" (§15064.5(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as amended). Even with mitigation, the project impacts resulting in demolition cannot be reduced to a less than significant level. The 13 historically significant properties within and adjacent to the Village Build -Out Plan project area are reported in the City of La Quinta Historic Resources Inventory as locally significant resources and as a result are listed on a local register making them "historical resources" pursuant to CEQA. The condition of the 13 buildings was verified in a field visit on December 4, 2015. All 13 buildings were found to be in good physical condition and retain sufficient levels of historical integrity such that their previous evaluation of significance has not been changed. The potential for direct and indirect impacts of proposed new development on vacant properties or redevelopment of existing properties on each of the resources are shown in Table 5.4-2, Potential for Direct and Indirect Effects. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-9 August 2016 745 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES Table 5.4-2 Potential for Direct and Indirect Effects Property address Zoning area Proximity to Village Work proposed Project potential Build -Out Plan area to impact 51351 Avenida Cove Immediately adjacent to None Potential indirect Navarro Residential Village Build -Out Project impacts boundary 51411 Avenida Cove Immediately adjacent to None Potential indirect Villa Residential Village Build -Out Project impacts boundary 51001 Village Within Village Build -Out Existing building Potential indirect Eisenhower Drive Commercial Project area not to be altered impacts 51453 Avenida Cove Within one city -block of None Potential indirect Navarro Residential Village Build -Out Project impacts boundary 51397 Avenida Cove Within one city -block of None Potential indirect Navarro Residential Village Build -Out Project impacts boundary 51489 Avenida Cove Within one city -block of None Potential indirect Martinez Residential Village Build -Out Project impacts boundary 51383 Avenida Cove Within one city -block of None Potential indirect Bermudas Residential Village Build -Out Project impacts boundary 51431 Avenida Cove Within one city -block of None Potential indirect Navarro Residential Village Build -Out Project impacts boundary 51453 Avenida Cove Within one city -block of None Potential indirect Martinez Residential Village Build -Out Project impacts boundary 78035-78039 Village Within Village Build -Out Potential Potential direct/ Calle Estado Commercial Project area redevelopment indirect impacts 78023 Calle Village Within Village Build -Out Existing building Potential indirect Estado Commercial Project area not to be altered impacts 77885 Avenida Village Within Village Build -Out Existing building Potential indirect Montezuma Commercial Project area not to be altered impacts 77895 Avenida Village Within Village Build -Out Existing building Potential indirect Montezuma Commercial Project area not to be altered impacts Source: Assessment of Historic Properties, December 15, 2015, Applied Earthworks. Only one of the 13 historically significant properties, a commercial building situated at 78035-78039 Calle Estado, is identified for potential redevelopment. This building is historically significant as a one-story building designed in the Spanish Colonial Revival style and as a commercial building in the historical downtown core. Demolition of this building would result in a direct impact. If the building is not demolished, new development immediately adjacent to this building has the potential to result in an indirect impact on the historical integrity and significance of the building. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-10 August 2016 746 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES Demolition or alteration of this building should be avoided. If demolition or substantial alteration occurs, the project will result in a direct impact on this cultural resource. Such changes would be considered a substantial adverse change under CEQA. Therefore, avoidance is recommended. If the property cannot be avoided, then mitigation measures must be implemented. Even with mitigation, the project impacts resulting in demolition cannot be reduced to a less than significant level (see Mitigation Measure CR-1). If the building is retained but redevelopment of this parcel occurs, the project could result in a substantial adverse change under CEQA. Therefore, mitigation measures should be implemented to ensure that new construction adjacent to this building is compatible in design, scale, massing, and appearance as required by CEQA through the imposition of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines (see Mitigation Measure CR-2). Four of the properties in Table 5.4-2, 78023 Calle Estado, 77895 Avenida Montezuma, 77885 Avenida Montezuma, and 51001 Eisenhower Drive, are one- and two-story commercial buildings designed in the Spanish Colonial or Monterey Revival style. These four buildings are located within the Village Build -Out Plan project area, which is zoned for commercial use. They are historically significant for their architectural style and as original buildings of the historical downtown commercial core. Although these properties will not be physically altered as a result of implementation of the Village Build -Out Plan, new development constructed immediately adjacent to the buildings has the potential to result in indirect impacts on the historical integrity and significance of these buildings. If new construction is not compatible in design, scale, massing or appearance, the project could result in a substantial adverse change under CEQA. Therefore, mitigation measures should be followed to ensure that new construction adjacent to these buildings is compatible (see Mitigation Measure CR-3). Eight of the properties in Table 5.4-2, (51351 Avenida Navarro, 51411 Avenida Villa, 51453 Avenida Navarro, 51397 Avenida Navarro, 51383 Avenida Bermudas, 51431 Avenida Navarro, 51489 Avenida Martinez, and 51453 Avenida Martinez), are residential buildings situated in the La Quinta Cove Thematic Historic District. They are located within a residential zone within close proximity to (one city block of) the Village Build -Out Plan project area. They are historically significant for their architectural style and as original buildings of the historical La Quinta Cove residential tract development. Although these buildings will not be physically altered as a result of implementation of the Village Build -Out Plan, new development located adjacent to or within close proximity to these buildings has the potential to produce an indirect impact on the historical integrity and significance of these buildings. A project adjacent to or within close proximity to the buildings will result in a substantial adverse change under CEQA. Therefore, mitigation measures should be implemented to ensure that new construction adjacent to these buildings is compatible in design, scale, massing, and appearance of existing historical commercial buildings in the Village Commercial zone (see Mitigation Measure CR-4). La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-11 August 2016 747 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES Implementation of Mitigation Measures CR-1 through CR-4 will reduce impacts to less than significant, but if demolition of the commercial building at 78035-78039 Calle Estado that is identified for redevelopment in the Build -out Plan cannot be avoided, it will result in a substantial adverse impact to a historically significant property. b. Substantial Adverse Change in the Significance of an Archaeological Resource Previous cultural surveys throughout the City have identified approximately 500 archaeological sites, both historic and prehistoric. Exhibit 5.4-1, Cultural Resources Survey Map, shows areas within the village that have previously been surveyed for cultural resources. Many of these prehistoric resources are from early Native Americans of the Cahuilla tribe. Vacant lands that have not been surveyed may contain buried archaeological resources. The Village Build -out Plan project area contains vacant properties, some of which may not have yet been disturbed by grading or excavation activities associated with development. Future construction activity on these sites, including grading activity, site excavation, and general construction could potentially result in direct or indirect disturbance or destruction of archaeological resources. Because the vacant properties in the Village are all relatively small, are located within an urban setting, and are relatively devoid of any vegetation, it is highly unlikely that any resources would be on the surface. Because the project area is considered to be highly sensitive for containing prehistoric archaeological deposits in subsurface contexts, vacant land that is proposed for development that hasn't been previously surveyed (See Exhibit 5.4-1) shall comply with Mitigation Measure CR-5, and a qualified archaeological monitor and Native American monitor shall be present on site during grading and excavation activities. With implementation of Mitigation Measure CR-5, impacts to archaeological resources will be less than significant for development on vacant properties within the La Quinta Village Build -out project area. Redevelopment within the Village Build -out project area is not anticipated to have a significant impact on archaeological resources because the sites for redevelopment are already highly disturbed. In order to increase parking within the Village, some development/redevelopment projects may include the addition of underground parking. This type of project would likely require deeper excavation than a typical project, resulting and an increased likelihood that archaeological resources will be uncovered. Therefore, proposed development/redevelopment projects that include underground parking will be required to comply with Mitigation Measure CR-5 in order to reduce impacts on archaeological resources to less than significant. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-12 August 2016 748 ATTACH M ENT 1 5 ' • ' y - �� L: o u . Source: La Quinta General Plan 2035, Figure III-4 E115 The Altum Group Cultural Resources Survey Map La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Legend Areas previously surveyed Linear surveys Village Build -Out Plan Area Exhibit 5.4-1 49 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-14 August 2016 750 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES C. Directly or Indirectly Destroy a Unique Paleontological Resource Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will facilitate new development in the project area. As shown in Exhibit 5.4-2, Poleontologicol Sensitivity Map, the City experiences varying degrees of paleontological sensitivity according to soil types. Sediments related to the ancient Lake Cahuilla beds exhibit the highest paleontological sensitivity. In comparison, granitic rock soils found along the Coral Mountains, which surround the Cove southwest of the project area, have low paleontological sensitivity, or the sensitivity is undetermined. The Village Build -out Plan project area is located in two areas as shown in Exhibit 5.4-2. The easterly portion of the project area is located within a High Paleontological Sensitivity area; while the westerly portion is located in an area that is Undetermined. Since paleontological sensitivity in the westerly portion of the project area is undetermined, the entire Build -out Plan project area is assumed to have moderate to high paleontological sensitivity. New development activity, including construction, grading, and other site disturbances in moderate and high sensitivity areas, has the potential to impact paleontological resources. The majority of the Village Build -out Plan project area is already developed, but vacant properties within the project area, some of which may not have yet been disturbed by grading or excavation activities associated with development, may potentially result in direct or indirect disturbance or destruction of paleontological resources. Redevelopment within the Village Build -out project area is not anticipated to have a significant impact on paleontological resources because the sites for redevelopment are already highly disturbed. However, some development/redevelopment projects within the Build -out Plan project area are anticipated to propose underground parking, in order to increase parking without reducing developable area. This type of project would likely require deeper excavation than previously performed during original development, resulting and an increased likelihood that archaeological resources will be uncovered. Due to the wide range of projects that can be proposed within the Village Build -out Plan project area, Mitigation Measure CR-6 will require future applicants to have a paleontologist review grading and excavation plans and determine if monitoring during construction is required. The purpose of the monitor is to ensure that during the construction phase of a project, if resources are discovered, the monitor will be available to redirect the construction to another area, until recovery is complete. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CR-6 will reduce impacts associated with paleontological resources to less than significant. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-15 August 2016 751 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-16 August 2016 752 ATTACH M ENT 1 vpmen .f. . 1 Low r � • ■ t • a y� 1 Undetermined ■ .r 1 Source: La Quinta General Plan 2035 E115 The Altum Group Low Paleontologic Sensitivity High Paleontologic Sensitivity s Ole Paleontological Sensitivity La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report City Boundary Dune Sand Granii#ic Rock Holocene Alluvium Lake Cahuilla Beds Village Build -Out Plan Area Exhibit 5.4-2 53 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-18 August 2016 754 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES d. Disturb Human Remains The discovery of human remains is always a possibility during ground disturbances. State of California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98. The Riverside County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the human remains are determined to be prehistoric, the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MILD). The MILD shall complete the inspection of the site within 48 hours of notification and may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. This requirement is also listed as Mitigation Measure CR-7, in order to ensure that it is included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. e. Impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources Regarding the Village Build -out plan project area, the vacant sites within the Village are all adjacent to existing developed sites, so the vacant sites are isolated from other vacant sites. Because the vacant properties in the Village are all relatively small, are located within an urban setting, and are all relatively flat and devoid of any vegetation, it is highly unlikely that any resources would be on the surface. However, because it is unknown whether resources exist on site, and previous correspondence with local tribes have also indicated that there was no specific information regarding cultural resources in the area, construction activities could potentially result in direct or indirect disturbance or destruction of tribal cultural resources. Redevelopment within the Village Build -out project area is not anticipated to have a significant impact on tribal cultural resources because the sites for redevelopment are already highly disturbed. However, some development/redevelopment projects within the Build -out Plan project area are anticipated to propose underground parking, in order to increase parking without reducing developable area. This type of project would likely require deeper excavation than previously performed during original development, resulting and an increased likelihood that tribal cultural resources will be uncovered. Mitigation Measure CR-5 will be implemented for all projects proposed on vacant sites and development/redevelopment projects proposing underground parking to ensure that, during construction or excavation, a qualified archaeological monitor and Native American monitor are on site to monitor activities. 5.4.5 Cumulative Impacts Nineteen historic -aged buildings were identified in the city-wide Historical Resources Survey, updated in 2010. Of these, thirteen were identified by the City as historically significant properties. Development and redevelopment associated with the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan has potential La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-19 August 2016 755 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES to directly and indirectly impact these resources, but mitigation has been developed to reduce possible impacts and protect historic resources within the Village. One structure in particular, at 78035-78039 Calle Estado, has been identified in the Build -out Plan for redevelopment. Demolition of this structure would result in a direct significant impact, but no cumulative impacts would occur. The Village Build -out project area has moderate to high potential for occurrence of archaeological and paleontological resources. Additionally, the possibility for uncovering tribal cultural resources during ground -disturbing activities is unknown at this time. Site specific archaeological and paleontological monitoring would be conducted for development projects on vacant sites and development/redevelopment sites proposing underground parking in the Village Build -out Plan project area, including a Native American monitor for archaeological resources. Therefore, new development in the project area would not contribute to or result in a cumulatively significant impact. 5.4.6 Mitigation Measures CR-1 Demolition or extensive alteration of the building at 78035-78039 Calle Estado should be avoided. Overriding considerations to justify the loss of the building would need to be developed were demolition pursued. Because the building is significant for its architectural merits and as one of La Quinta's original downtown commercial buildings, mitigation measures such as photographic and written documentation must be developed prior to any demolition or extensive alteration of this building. Documentation of the building shall follow the Historic American Building Survey (NABS) Level I Standards. This documentation shall include production of high -quality archival print photographs and plan drawings of the building, including but not limited to a floor plan, elevation drawings, and any character -defining features or details on the building. All work carried out pursuant to the documentation of the building shall be conducted by, or under the direct supervision of a person or persons meeting, at a minimum, the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (48 FR 44738-39 as revised in 1994) as an architectural historian. A written report detailing the documentation shall be provided to the City of La Quinta upon completion of the work. The report shall be produced on archival materials and filed with the La Quinta Historical Society and Museum and La Quinta Library. CR-2 If redevelopment of 78035-78039 Calle Estado occurs, the design of any new construction adjacent to this one-story Spanish Colonial Revival -style commercial building must be compatible in design, scale, massing, and appearance as stated in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. The design of new construction should not replicate the historic building style resulting in a false sense of history, but it shall not contrast starkly from its architectural style or design. New construction adjacent La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-20 August 2016 756 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES to this historic resource shall be no more than two stories high, and shall not overpower or overshadow this building (massing/scale). The final design of the new construction should be developed in consultation with a historic architect or architectural historian who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (as published in 36 CFR Part 61). CR-3 The design of any new construction adjacent to the one- and two-story Spanish Colonial and Monterey Revival -style historic resources at 78023 Calle Estado, 77895 Avenida Montezuma, 77885 Avenida Montezuma, and 51001 Eisenhower Drive, shall be compatible in design, scale, massing, and appearance as required by the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. The building design should not attempt to replicate these buildings in appearance, but shall not conflict or contrast with their architectural style. New construction adjacent to these historic resources shall be no more than two stories high, and shall not overpower or overshadow these existing buildings (scale/massing). The final design of the new construction shall be developed in consultation with a historic architect or architectural historian who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (as published in 36 CFR Part 61). CR-4 The design of any new construction within the Village Build -Out Plan Area adjacent to the residences of the La Quinta Cove Thematic Historic District shall be compatible in design, scale, massing, and appearance with existing historical commercial buildings in the Village Commercial zone. The design of new commercial buildings should be compatible with the Spanish Colonial and Monterey Revival architectural style of the existing historical commercial core. New construction adjacent to the La Quinta Cove Thematic Historic District shall be no more than two stories high, and shall not overpower or overshadow the historical residential buildings of the La Quinta Cove as required by the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. The final design of the new construction should be developed in consultation with a historic architect or architectural historian who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (as published in 36 CFR Part 61). CR-5 Because the project site is considered to be highly sensitive for containing prehistoric archaeological deposits in subsurface contexts, a qualified archaeological monitor (and Native American monitor) shall be present during all phases of construction grading and trenching activities for any project developed on vacant land that has not been previously surveyed for cultural resources, as illustrated in Exhibit 5.4-1 and any development/ redevelopment project that proposes underground parking. The amount of monitoring shall be determined by the archaeologist through the preparation of a monitoring plan to be prepared prior to commencement of grading. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.4-21 August 2016 757 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES CR-6 A qualified paleontologist shall be retained prior to the start of construction for projects proposed on vacant lots or development/redevelopment projects proposing underground parking. After final depths of impacts are known (from grading plans), a paleontological mitigation plan shall be prepared limited to the proposed deep impact areas (greater than 3 feet) of the project only. In particular, the plan shall (1) clearly define that test trenches that would be dug to the maximum depth of proposed impacts, (2) permit the use of heavy equipment to perform the trenching as all samples will be taken from sidewalls after a stratigraphic profile is developed, (3) require recording of each strata revealed, (4) require radiocarbon dates for each strata, (5) require samples of about 10 kilogram (kg) for each strata with collection of additional samples up to 100 kg for layers rich in vertebrate fossils, (6) require identification and analysis by recognized experts, (7) require an interpretive report, (8) require curation of significant specimens recovered and (9) encourage publication of results. The plan would identify the amount of monitoring required. CR-7 In the event that human remains are uncovered, no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98. The Riverside County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the human remains are determined to be prehistoric, the coroner will notify the NAHC, which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD shall complete the inspection of the site within 48 hours of notification and may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting A. The Planning Division shall review site -specific historic, archaeological, and paleontological surveys and monitoring reports prepared for new development projects in sensitive areas prior to entitlement of new development projects. Responsible Parties: La Quinta Planning Division, developer, Professional Archaeologist/Paleontologist. 5.4.7 Level of Significance after Mitigation Implementation of mitigation measures CUL-1 through CUL-7 will ensure that impacts to cultural resources would be less than significant. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR I.�0% August 2016 758 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 G EOLOGY AN D SOI LS 5.5 Geology and Soils 5.5.1 Introduction This section of the EIR addresses potential impacts associated with geology and soils that may arise from implementation of the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan. The existing geologic and soil conditions within the La Quinta Village area are described, and the potential impacts of build out are assessed. Sources used in the preparation of this section are included in Chapter 9, References. 5.5.2 Existing Conditions Environmental Setting Soils in the City are generally Holocene -age soils, comprised of alluvial, or waterborne sand and gravel, lacustrine (lake) sediments, and Aeolian (windborne) sandy soils in the valley portion of La Quinta. Older, harder, crystalline rock that occurs in the mountains weathers and forms boulders or further erodes. The latter creates fine particles that are carried along canyons and drainages downslope, and are deposited as alluvial fans at the base of mountain slopes. La Quinta, like most of the eastern Coachella Valley, was inundated by ancient Lake Cahuilla as recently as 400 years ago. Lacustrine deposits may be up to 300 feet thick, and may form clay soils in the valley areas where these soils alternate in layers with alluvial fan sediments and rock debris from the adjacent mountains. There are eleven primary soil series that have been mapped as occurring in the City of La Quinta and its sphere of influence. Five of the eleven soils occur in the La Quinta Village project area; and are all formed in alluvium: Coachella fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (CpA), Gilman fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (GbA), Indio fine sandy loam (Ip), Indio very fine sandy loam (Is), and Myoma fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (MaB). Much of the valley, including the Village Build -out Plan project area, is subject to high winds, which lift soils from alluvial fans along the base of mountain slopes and canyons and other areas where loose, sandy soils occur. These sediments are carried along the central axis of the valley, generally from the northwest to southeast, creating a condition known as "blowsand". Although, the Village Build -out Plan project area is mostly developed with urban uses, blowsand is less of an issue within the project area. The Coachella Valley and the City of La Quinta are located in a region that is subject to complex and dynamic geologic forces that have, and continue to shape its dramatically varied topography. The area is situated at the margin of the Colorado Desert and Peninsular Range physiographic provinces. Each province comprises a distinct geologic and climatic region that has resulted in diverse and La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-1 August 2016 759 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 G EOLOGY AN D SOI LS unique landscapes. The Colorado Desert province, which encompasses the valley floor portion of the City, is part of a low-lying basin extending from the Banning Pass to the border with Mexico. To the southwest, the Santa Rosa Mountains are within the Peninsular Ranges province. Elevations in the Build -out Plan project area range from approximately 39 feet above mean sea level at the eastern boundary, to approximately 57 feet above mean sea level at the western boundary. Development opportunities and constraints are dictated by the area's topography, but the Village Build -out Plan project area is relatively flat, so developmental constraints due to topography are not expected in this area. Geologic Units There are two geologic unit types which have been mapped in the Village Build -out Plan project area and are described below. Exhibit 5.5-1, Geologic Map, shows the locations of these soil units in the project area and geologic soil units within the City and Sphere of Influence. Interbedded lacustrine (clay of valley areas) (QI) The Valley portion of La Quinta is located at the edge of the Salton Trough, a broad tectonic depression that has been sinking over millions of years and has filled with several thick sediment layers that form what is now the Valley floor. As shown in Exhibit 5.5-1, the eastern portion of the Build -out Plan project area is within the margins of ancient Lake Cahuilla, which evaporated possibly as recently as 400 years ago. These soils consist of lacustrine (lake) sediments up to 300 feet thick, layered with alluvial fan and colluvial sediments deposited from mountain slopes. Potential for soil collapse of lacustrine soils is considered low given the presence of deeper sediments from the ancient lakes that underlie the youngest alluvium. Lacustrine soils have high permeability, except for where they interbed with silt or clay layers, which slow the downward percolation of water. There is generally low potential for expansive soils, with the exception of lake deposits with silt and clay near structural foundation elements. Alluvial deposits (sand of Valley areas) (Qa) These soils are geologically young and near -surface, often containing organic debris, and have been rapidly deposited by flash floods. Therefore, engineering issues include compressibility, and soil collapse, with the introduction of irrigation water into dry soils. These soils are also highly susceptible to erosion, with moderate to high permeability. They are appropriate for use as fill after the removal of organic materials and oversized rocks, but for compaction generally require the addition of water. Older, more developed portions of La Quinta, including the Build -out Plan project area, which occur downwind of Eisenhower Mountain, are built on alluvium. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-2 August 2016 760 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS To the south of the La Quinta Village area, alluvial deposits generally occur along the base the Santa Rosa Mountains at the southern end of La Quinta Cove. These soils are geologically young and near - surface, often containing organic debris, and have been deposited by flash floods. Soil Units A Custom Soil Resource Report was prepared to identify soil unit classifications within the Village Build -out Plan project area (see Appendix Q. A total of five soil unit types have been mapped in the Build -out Plan project area, consisting of Coachella fine sand (CpA), Gilman fine sandy loam (GbA), Indio fine sandy loam (Ip), Indio very fine sandy loam (Is), and Myoma fine sand (MaB). Of the five soil types, Indio very fine sandy loam occupies the greatest percentage of area within the Build -out Plan at 54 percent followed by Myoma fine sand at 23 percent. Drainage class characteristics of all soil types are generally described as well drained with the exception of MaB which is somewhat excessively well -drained. All soils have a farmland classification of prime farmland if irrigated and have a salinity classification of nonsaline to slightly saline. Regulatory Setting Seismic Hazard Mapping Act The State of California enacted the Seismic Hazards Mapping Act (SHMA) in 1990. It is intended to protect the health and safety of the public from seismically induced ground failure, including ground shaking, liquefaction, and slope stability. The California Geological Survey (CGS) is responsible for implementing the Act. It is charged with providing local governments with maps that identify areas susceptible to such hazards. Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act The Alquist-Priolo Act was enacted in 1972 to mitigate hazards related to surface faulting by identifying zones where surface fractures have occurred. It establishes Alquist-Priolo Zones to identify and prohibit construction or development within areas that are at risk of surface fractures. It is the responsibility of the State Geologist to establish regulatory zones around the surface traces of active faults and to issue appropriate maps identifying Alquist-Priolo zones. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-3 August 2016 761 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-4 August 2016 762 ATTACH M ENT 1 Project Site *****� QP Source: La Quinta General Plan 2035 EIR, Figure III-6 E115 The Altum Group Geologic Map La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 5-5.1 63 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-6 August 2016 764 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 G EOLOGY AN D SOI LS Seismic Hazards The majority of Southern California is located at the boundary between the North American and Pacific tectonic plates, which are moving past each other at varying rates. Most of western southern California, including the Coachella Valley, is located on the Pacific Plate. This plate is moving at a rate of approximately 165 feet in 1,000 years (50 millimeters per year), generally in a northwesterly direction. The San Andreas Fault marks the boundary between these two plates. This major fault trends generally northwest to southeast, approximately 7 miles northeast of the Village. It accommodates approximately 60% to 70% of the plate movement described above, while the rest is distributed among other faults within the San Andreas system as well as those associated with the Eastern California Shear Zone. As a result, the Village Build -out Plan project area is located in a physical and geographic area that is susceptible to strong seismic activity. Major Faults Affecting The Build -out Plan Project Area Earthquakes can result in impacts ranging from significant property damage to the loss of public services and facilities and the loss of life. The most severe impacts in the La Quinta area would be expected to result from strong ground shaking associated with earthquakes. Earthquakes and associated groundshaking can also generate other impacts, such as landslides, damage or destruction to structures, liquefaction, and settlement. Fires, hazardous materials releases, disruption of essential facilities and services such as water, sewer, gas, electric, drainage, and transportation can also occur. Flooding may happen when dam or water tanks fail as a result of ground shaking. The most significant faults with potential to affect the City and the project area are discussed below. The locations of these faults are shown on Exhibit 5.5-2, Fault Locations. San Andreas Fault Zone The San Andreas, which passes approximately 7.5 miles northeast of the Village Build -out Plan project area, is considered the major fault in southern California. This is because of the influence it has over seismic hazards, as well as the frequency and magnitude of earthquakes it generates. The San Andreas Fault extends approximately 690 miles in California, from the Salton Sea to Cape Mendocino in northern California. The 2007 Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP) estimated that the southern San Andreas fault has a 59 percent probability of causing an earthquake of at least magnitude 6.7 (Richter scale) in the next 30 years. A rupture along the entire southern San Andreas Fault, including, from south to north, the Coachella, San Gorgonio -Garnet Hill, San Bernardino and Mojave segments, with an epicenter along the San Andreas fault closest to La Quinta represents the worst case scenario for La Quinta. Such an La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-7 August 2016 765 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS occurrence would generate peak ground accelerations in the City between 0.5 g and 1.1 g, which would result in severe to violent ground shaking. San Jacinto Fault Zone The San Jacinto fault zone is located approximately 16 miles south of the La Quinta Village. Extending approximately 17.5 miles, it intersects with the San Andreas Fault in San Bernardino, and trends southeasterly toward the Brawley area. South of the U.S./Mexico border it continues as the Imperial fault. The San Jacinto fault has historically produced more large earthquakes than any other fault in southern California, albeit none as large as the 1857 and 1906 earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault. WGCEP estimates there is an average 31 percent probability of all the segments of the San Jacinto fault rupturing between 1994 and 2024. The Anza and Coyote Creek segments, respectively, are the segments of the San Jacinto fault zone closest to La Quinta. WGCEP studies (2008) indicate that there is an average recurrence interval for earthquakes along the Anza segment of 238 years, with the most recent earthquakes occurring between 205 and 235 years ago. Should a Mw 7.2 earthquake occur on this segment, it would be expected to generate peak ground accelerations in the Village Build -out area of between about 0.15g and 0.32g. Burnt Mountain Fault The Burnt Mountain fault was unknown prior to 1992; it is one of several of the Eastern Mojave Shear Zone faults. In 1992 a ground -surface rupture, thought to be a large aftershock of the Landers earthquake, occurred along a 3.1-mile-length of this fault. Geologic mapping indicates this fault is approximately 13 miles long and is approximately 15 miles north of the City at its closest point. It is considered capable of producing a magnitude 6.0 to 6.5 earthquake. Based on a Mw 6.5 earthquake along this fault, horizontal ground accelerations of between 0.08g and 0.21g could occur in La Quinta, with higher accelerations in the northern portion of the City, closest to this fault. Eureka Peak Fault The Eureka Peak Fault is approximately 12.5 to 15 miles long and is a right -lateral strike -slip fault. Along with other faults, it ruptured during the 1992 Landers earthquake, and is thought to have caused the Joshua Tree earthquake of April 22, 1992. The Eureka Peak fault is considered capable of generating earthquakes of between Mw 5.5 and 6.8. In the event of a Mw 6.4 earthquake on this fault, estimates indicate it could generate horizontal peak ground accelerations in the Village Build - out Plan area of between 0.08g and 0.21g. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-8 August 2016 . ^, ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 G EOLOGY AN D SOI LS Pinto Mountain Fault This fault occurs north-northwest of the City of La Quinta at its nearest point, at the boundary of the north side of the Little San Bernardino Mountains near the town of Yucca Valley. Its length is thought to be between 45 and 56 miles. As defined in the Alquist-Priolo Act, it is considered an active fault, in that it has ruptured at least four times within the last approximately 9,400 years. A scenario entailing a magnitude 7.2 earthquake on this fault would generate peak horizontal ground acceleration in La Quinta of about 0.09g to 0.21g. Seismically Induced Geotechnical Hazards Seismically Induced Ground Shaking Seismically induced ground shaking is the most potentially significant geotechnical hazard to the Village Build -out Plan project area. As discussed above, large earthquakes along regional faults, including the San Andreas and San Jacinto fault zones, have the potential to generate moderate to severe ground shaking in the Build -out Plan project area. Factors that determine the effects of ground motion and the degree of structural damage that may occur include: • Intensity of the earthquake. • Distance between epicenter and site. • Soil and bedrock composition. • Depth to groundwater. • Presence of ridge tops (may result in higher localized accelerations). • Building design and other criteria. Liquefaction Liquefaction occurs when ground shaking of relatively long duration and intensity over 0.2 g occurs in areas of loose, unconsolidated soils with relatively shallow groundwater depths (50 feet or less). The sudden increase in water pressure in pores between soil grains may substantially decrease soil shear strength. This creates a condition where soil takes on the qualities of a liquid or a semi - viscous substance. Ground Failure from Compressible Soils Compressible soils are geologically young (Holocene age), have low density and are of unconsolidated sediments. They may compress under the weight of fill embankments and structures. These soils often include recently deposited alluvium, which occurs in the Village Build - out Plan project area. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-9 August 2016 767 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 G EOLOGY AN D SOI LS A variety of factors may affect the soil's overall compressibility. These include soil characteristics such as texture and grain size, density and moisture and the thickness of the compressible layer(s), as well as engineering parameters. Ground Failure from Collapsible Soils Recently accumulated soils in arid or semi -arid environments may be subject to soil collapse, or hydroconsolidation. These soils are typically dry and contain tiny voids. If partly supported by clay or silt, they become rearranged and lose cohesion when inundated. Even relatively light loads can cause these soils to settle substantially and quickly under these conditions. When surface water permeates them, differential settlement can occur. Where settlement occurs at or near buildings, particularly when heavy irrigation takes place near a building foundation, structures such as walls or foundations may crack. Subsidence Ground subsidence occurs when the ground surface gradually sinks or settles, with no horizontal movement. Subsidence is primarily caused by human activity. The extraction of sub -surface water, oil or gas in sediment filled valleys and floodplains are primary contributors. Although less common, natural forces, such as earthquake movements, can also result in subsidence and have in some cases resulted in abrupt elevation changes across faults. The effects of regional subsidence include earth fissures, sinkholes or depressions, and surface drainage disruption. Certain improvements may be sensitive to slight elevation changes, including canals, levees, and underground pipelines; these are most at risk from subsidence. Structures such as wells, buildings, roads and railroads can also be damaged where substantial subsidence occurs. When groundwater extraction surpasses supplies, a condition known as overdraft, a loss of aquifer storage capacity can occur and create subsidence. This condition exists throughout the Coachella Valley, including the Village Build -out Plan project area. Therefore, CVWD has instituted a variety of measures to manage subsidence. These include the use of imported water, recharging groundwater basins, and reducing pumping of local wells. Wind Erosion Wind erosion is common in flat, bare, dry and sandy areas. Wind erosion damages land and natural vegetation through sediment transport and re -deposition. These processes result in soil loss and deterioration of structures and air pollution. Much of the Coachella Valley, including the project area, is susceptible to wind and wind-blown sand hazards. A variety of health problems are associated with wind and blowing sand, such as skin disorders, allergies and respiratory irritation, and eye infections. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-10 August 2016 768 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 5.5.3 Applicable Goals and Policies Ana i r, Fn- l Protection of the residents' health and safety, and of their property, from geologic and seismic hazards. Policy GEO-1.2 The City shall continue to require that development in areas subject to rockfall, landslide, liquefaction and/or other geotechnical hazards described in this Element, prepare detailed geotechnical analyses that include mitigation measures intended to reduce potential hazards to less than significant levels. Policy GEO-1.3 The City shall require that development in areas subject to collapsible or expansive soils conduct soil sampling and laboratory testing and implement mitigation measures that minimize such hazards. Program GEO-1.3.a: The Building and Safety Department shall review and determine the adequacy of soils and/or other geotechnical studies conducted for proposed projects and enforce the implementation of mitigation measures. Policy GEO-1.4 The City shall require that all new structures be built in accordance with the latest adopted version of the Building Code. Policy GEO-1.5 The City shall continue to require that structures that pose a safety threat due to inadequate seismic design are retrofitted or removed from use, according to law. Policy GEO-1.6 The City shall coordinate and cooperate with public and quasi -public agencies to ensure that major utilities continue to be functional in the event of a major earthquake. Program GEO-1.6.a: The City shall maintain working relationships and strategies between the Public Works Department, utility providers, and other appropriate agencies to strengthen or relocate utility facilities and take other appropriate measures to safeguard major utility distribution systems. 5.5.4 Project Impacts As the La Quinta Village Build -out project area approaches capacity, the potential for a number of geologic and seismic hazards will increase. New development, in accordance with the Village Build - out plan, will result in construction of structures and infrastructure that could expose persons and property to geological hazards during a seismic event. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-11 August 2016 769 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Thresholds of Significance The following standards and criteria have been drawn from Appendix G: Environmental Checklist Form of the CEQA Guidelines. Implementation of the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan would have a significant effect on soils and geology if it is determined that the project will: a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking. iii. Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction. iv. Landslides. b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. c. Locate the project on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code, creating substantial risks to life or property. d. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater. a-i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault The majority of southern California is located at the boundary between the North American and Pacific tectonic plates, which are moving past each other at varying rates. Most of western portion of southern California, including the Coachella Valley, is located on the Pacific Plate. This plate is moving at a rate of approximately 165 feet in 1,000 years (50 millimeters per year), generally in a northwesterly direction. The San Andreas Fault marks the boundary between these two plates. This major fault trends generally northwest to southeast, approximately 7.5 miles northeast of the Village Build -out Plan project area. It accommodates approximately 60 percent to 70 percent of the plate movement described above, while the rest is distributed among other faults within the San Andreas system, as well as those associated with the Eastern California Shear Zone. As a result, the Village Build -out Plan project area is located in a physical and geographic area that is susceptible to strong seismic activity. Surface rupture can be expected to occur along the San Andreas Fault. However, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo (AP) Earthquake Fault Zoning Map, the Village Build -out Plan project area is located 7.5 miles south of San Andreas AP Zone and thus would not be impacted by fault rupture. Although no impact is expected, all new and redevelopment projects within the project area will be required to adhere to Uniform Building Code (UBC) and California Building Code (CBC) La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-12 August 2016 770 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 G EOLOGY AN D SOI LS regulations per mitigation measure GEO-1 to address strong seismic ground shaking (see Section a-ii below for further discussion). No Impact is anticipated associated with fault rupture in the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area. a-ii. Strong seismic ground shaking Seismically induced groundshaking poses the most potentially significant geotechnical hazard to the Village Build -out Plan project area. Large earthquakes along regional faults such as the San Andreas and San Jacinto fault zones have the capacity of generating moderate to severe ground shaking in the project area. There are several factors that determine the effects of ground motion and the degree of structural damage that may occur. These include earthquake intensity, distance from the epicenter to the site, composition of soil and bedrock, building design, as well as others. As distance from the fault along which the earthquake occurs increases, peak ground accelerations and seismic intensity generally decrease. Local conditions such as soft soils, shallow ground water, and the presence of ridge tops may amplify the effects of seismic waves and may also result in higher localized accelerations. As discussed above, the project area would be subject to potentially moderate to severe ground shaking as a result of earthquakes along the San Andreas Fault Zone and associated faults in the area. It is estimated that there is a ten percent probability that a ground motion of approximately 0.5g will be exceeded in 50 years as measured from the proximity of the La Quinta City Hall. This is a moderate to very high level of ground shaking, which would be expected to result in moderate to heavy damage, especially to unreinforced masonry buildings of older construction design. Foundations may also shift, resulting in exposed power lines, gas leaks, and fires, and exposed power lines. All new buildings in La Quinta must utilize reinforced masonry and must comply with the UBC/CBC, and it is expected that this compliance will allow structures to resist major earthquakes without collapsing, even if structural damage occurs. Lastly, mitigation (GEO-1 and GEO-2) implementing the preparation of a geotechnical and soils analysis for all new development and redevelopment projects and incorporating structural design components consistent with UBC/CBC regulations, will ensure consistency with City Policy GEO-1.4. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-1 and GEO-2, impacts in regard to strong seismic ground shaking would be reduced to less than significant levels. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-13 August 2016 771 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-14 August 2016 772 ATTACH M ENT 1 Project Site Source: La Quinta General Plan 2035 EIR, Figure III-8 E115 The Altum Group Fault Locations La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 5-5.2 73 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-16 August 2016 774 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 G EOLOGY AN D SOI LS a-iii. Ground Failure, Liquefaction and Subsidence Since the project area contains alluvial soils mixed with lacustrine clay deposits, localized settlement can occur where soils such as alluvium or wind-borne soils have been recently deposited. By requiring testing and review of adequacy of soils by the Building and Safety Department, the project would maintain consistency with City Policy GEO-1.3 and Program GEO-1.3a, and by implementing Mitigation Measure GEO-2, would reduce impacts in regard to collapsible soils to a less than significant level. Liquefaction Given its proximity to major, active regional fault systems, the project area and the entire City of La Quinta is subject to strong ground shaking. Liquefaction occurs when there is a loss in shear strength when fine-grained soils become saturated. Damage can result when buildings tilt or sink. As shown in Exhibit 5.5-3, Seismic Hazards, the Village Build -out Plan project area is not within the area that is susceptible to liquefaction so that any impacts would be less than significant. Subsidence The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has monitored subsidence rates in the Coachella Valley over several decades. These data indicate rapid increases in subsidence rates, which is primarily attributed to groundwater extraction in the Valley. Irreversible subsidence can occur when groundwater is removed from clay and silt layers in the underlying aquifer, creating surface fissures and cracks. In the Coachella Valley, fissures have been recorded in one instance in La Quinta, in 1948 near the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains. Subsidence is most typical in valleys where overdraft is an issue. CVWD is currently addressing this issue at a regional level in its groundwater management program. To reduce this impact, CVWD has implemented a range of programmatic measures, including groundwater recharge, imported water, and a variety of water conservation techniques and programs. This is discussed further in Section 5.7, Hydrology and Water Quality. Based on the subsidence map prepared by USGS in conjunction with CVWD, the La Quinta Village Build out Plan project area is located southwest of the subsidence zone in La Quinta, and therefore, is not expected to be significantly impacted by regional subsidence. Implementation of programmatic measures developed by CVWD in an effort to reduce regional subsidence in the Coachella Valley will further reduce any impacts with regard to subsidence. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-17 August 2016 775 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 G EOLOGY AN D SOI LS This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-18 August 2016 776 ATTACH M ENT 1 NOTES: iris map „ � �..e.,dN w, �nRal tint aK lianniry; �aly. Inn..n.,non on m�. n� i. nx I fJhnem m terse as a attsrlcc• av dtMnlled � IV Irnw. bgatioes a IndW1dw1 ates. nnr ans �niY)rhr er.hrnm ,Rp,ir,n„rn++n lonh In p.-krg,c hu dn,y,,/al.x.. Fxtn Comuhann lrtemanonal lECh make, nn minftartalluea warramka; mgaM,nt; - the —y of the data io-n which rheae nupa were derived. lC) shall not be I.W / nMnarryr mm�arrm tr any d,—,,Mir—,,E r ul, i w kind.(, e, rnne�nn,Yial / dvnga� wait,qe,.t m any r (aim tq mry recr a thin( parry u� auuwa <d, a .n:nng / hurt the utc W Ihis my.Cb Project / Site r 1 J ` tr't• � 1 t Source: La Quinta General Plan 2035 E115 The Altum Group I 't I� / RJ / r / / Or inure III-9 / Legend Seismic Hazards Explanation Earthquake -Induced Slope Instability _ Very Iligh Soil Block Slides High Soil Slumps Moderate Rock Falls Liquefaction Susceptibility _ I ligh (areas underlain by youthful, unconsolidated sediments, and historically shallow groundwater within 30 feet of ground surface) Moderate (areas underlain by youthful, unconsolidated sediments, and historically shallow groundwater 30 to 50 feet below the ground surface) Groundwater Elevation per DWR 1964 La Quinta City Boundary La Quints Sphere of Influence Fed W E :000 0 2000 Mden S Scale: 1:72,000 R•.kw USGS TaI.,grayhk Mal, k. 5ura•IMAPS RASTER, 1997 Sw s AMA A frun Ri-4,k• Cuunty G•-1 Plan, 0.I.M. ~ I of WakR Rcw - Wlkam 108 0964), scut LISGS JQn Digital tkwaliun Atr.M MIGntem&nal EA DnSukantS Project Number: 3004 Ddle: 2010 Seismic Hazards La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 5-5.3 77 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-20 August 2016 778 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 G EOLOGY AN D SOI LS a -iv. Landslides Landslides and rockfall can occur when unstable slope conditions are worsened by strong ground motion caused by seismic events. Conditions that lead to landslide vulnerability include high seismic potential; rapid uplift and erosion that creates steep slopes and deeply incised canyons; folded and highly fractured rock; and rock with silt or clay layers that are inherently weak. Rockfall and rockslides are also common on very steep slopes. Landslides have been recorded after periods of heavy rainfall, and rockfall has been associated with slope failure during drier periods. Areas where development is located below hillsides, mountain slopes and steep canyon walls are considered most susceptible to rockfall. Perched on slopes, boulders can result in a rockfall hazard to development adjacent to these slopes. The La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan project area however, is not near or directly adjacent to the foothills of the Santa Rosa Mountains and is relatively flat. Furthermore, as shown in Exhibit 5.5-3, the project area is not within the area that is at risk of slope instability. Therefore, no impacts in this regard are expected. b. Soil Erosion or Loss of Topsoil Hydrological Erosion Climate, topography, soil and rock types, and vegetation are all factors that influence erosion, runoff, and sedimentation. These issues are relevant to La Quinta given the area's topography. Adjacent mountains are composed of fractured bedrock that has undergone rapid geologic uplift. The region is subject to infrequent but often powerful winter storms that generate high rates of erosion. Where wildfires have removed vegetation from mountain slopes, erosion risk is further increased. These conditions are intensified when storms create large volumes of sediment that flow to areas downslope. Within the project area, grading and clearing activities eliminate protective vegetation, modify natural drainage patterns, and compress soils. Development also reduces the surface area available for water to percolate which can increase the risk of downstream sedimentation and flooding. Development plans for new projects in the project area are required to incorporate temporary and permanent erosion control. Where such projects exceed one acre, developers must obtain coverage under the Statewide General Construction Permit and the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. Requirements associated with this coverage would include the preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), Best Management Practices (BMPs) and in some cases the preparation of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for a project site (See Section 5.8, Hydrology). Impacts associated with hydrological erosion will be less than significant if all forgoing erosion control requirements are implemented. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-21 August 2016 779 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 G EOLOGY AN D SOI LS Wind Erosion According to Exhibit 5.5-4, Wind Susceptibility Map, the project area has a high to very high likelihood for wind erosion. Soils may be loosened and transported during grading and construction activities. For this reason, erosion control measures including routine site watering, cessation of construction on extremely windy days, installation of wind barriers and soil watering at construction sites would be used and required for development within the project area pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 403, in order to mitigate construction impacts to a less than significant level. (See Section 5.2, Air Quality and Section 5.8, Hydrology). C. Expansive Soils Varying amounts of fine-grained silts and clays within soils may shrink or swell as moisture content changes. The presence of expansive soils may create pressure that can affect structures or other surface improvements. The project area and the Valley floor are underlain by alluvial sand and gravel interbedded with fine- grained lakebed deposits such as silts and clays. The region was the site of ancient Lake Cahuilla, as well as other large lakes that inundated the Salton Trough. These soils consist of lacustrine (lake) sediments up to 300 feet thick, layered with alluvial fan and colluvial sediments deposited from mountain slopes. Lacustrine soils have high permeability, except for where they are interbedded with silt or clay layers, which slow the downward percolation of water. There is generally low potential for expansive soils, with the exception of lake deposits with silt and clay near structural foundation elements. As a result of these characteristics, there may be considerable variation in the expansion of these soils after site grading. Typical soil profiles on older alluvial fan deposits may include substantial amounts of clay material that would be expected to be moderately expansive. Implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-2 in requiring analysis of soil sampling, laboratory testing and preparation of a geotechnical and soils analysis for all new development would maintain consistency with City Policy GEO-1.3 and Program GEO-1.3a and would reduce impacts in regard to expansive soils to a less than significant level. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-22 August 2016 780 ATTACH M ENT 1 Project Site Source: La Quinta General Plan 2035 EIR, Figure III-7 E115 The Altum Group Wind Susceptibility Map La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 5-5.4 81 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-24 August 2016 782 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 G EOLOGY AN D SOI LS Corrosive Soils Soil and buried metallic structures, such as utility pipes or elements within building foundations, may react in a variety of ways involving complex electrochemical and bacteriological processes. On the Valley floor including the project area, sediments may be present that are corrosive to metallic objects, such as pipelines. Means to reduce risks associated with corrosive soils may include the use of special cement mixes, specialized coatings or protective wrapping materials, and specified soil water content. A soils analysis to include testing by a qualified corrosion engineer would confirm if there is a presence of corrosive soils, and to provide recommendations to alleviate the condition. By requiring testing and review of adequacy of soils by the Building and Safety Department, the project would maintain consistency with City Policy GEO-1.3 and Program GEO- 1.3a, and by implementing Mitigation Measure GEO-2, would determine if corrosive soil testing is, or is not needed, thereby reducing impacts in this regard to less than significant levels. d. Septic Systems/Alternative Waste Disposal Systems All existing and future buildings are and will be connected to sewer lines and no septic systems are proposed. 5.5.5 Cumulative Impacts New and existing development within the Village Build -out Plan project area could be adversely impacted by geotechnical hazards. Mitigation measures in the form of CBC compliance during grading and construction address geotechnical hazards in regards to fault rupture, seismic ground shaking, ground failure, liquefaction, subsidence, loss of topsoil and expansive soils or corrosive soils. Mitigation Measures GEO-1 and GEO-2 would ensure that geotechnical and soils analysis and conformance with current UBC and CBC regulations are implemented. With implementation of the foregoing Mitigation Measures and adherence to goals, policies and programs as identified above, all new development within the project area will assist in minimizing cumulative impacts. Therefore, cumulative impacts associated with geology and soils are expected to be less than significant. 5.5.6 Mitigation Measures GEO-1 Applicants for new structures shall utilize modern building materials and techniques, and be built in accordance with the latest version of the California Building Code (CBC). GEO-2 Applicants for new development projects, including redevelopment involving changes to building size shall be required to prepare a detailed geotechnical and soils analysis that includes soil sampling, laboratory testing and mitigation measures intended to reduce potential geotechnical hazards to less than significant levels. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-25 August 2016 783 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting A. During site preparation for any project, the City Engineer and/or Building and Safety Department staff shall visit the site to assure compliance with applicable conditions of approval, City ordinances, and erosion control plans. Responsible Parties: City Engineer, Building and Safety Department, project developer, grading contractor. B. Subsequent to preparation of final development plans and specifications and prior to grading and construction, the Geotechnical Consultant and the City Engineer shall review foundation plans to confirm compatibility with site -specific geotechnical conditions and conformance with the recommendations contained herein. The need for additional subsurface exploration shall be determined on a project -by -project basis. Responsible Parties: City Engineer, Geotechnical Consultant. C. Rough grading shall be performed under geological and/or engineering observation by the Geotechnical Consultant and the City Engineer, as appropriate. Responsible Parties: City Engineer and Geotechnical Consultant. 5.5.7 Level of Significance after Mitigation With implementation of mitigation herein, impacts in regard to geology and soils will be reduced to less than significant. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.5-26 August 2016 784 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 5.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 5.6.1 Introduction The purpose of this section is to describe the existing setting regarding the generation of Greenhouse gasses, and the potential impacts that may occur with implementation of the Village Build -out Plan. References used in the preparation of this section are identified in Chapter 9, References. 5.6.2 Existing Conditions Environmental Setting Constituent gases of the Earth's atmosphere, called atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHG), play a critical role in the Earth's radiation amount by trapping infrared radiation emitted from the Earth's surface, which otherwise would have escaped to space. Prominent greenhouse gases contributing to this process include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone, water vapor, nitrous oxide (N20), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). This phenomenon, known as the Greenhouse Effect, is responsible for maintaining a habitable climate. Anthropogenic (caused or produced by humans) emissions of these greenhouse gases in excess of natural ambient concentrations are responsible for the enhancement of the Greenhouse Effect and have led to a trend of unnatural warming of the Earth's natural climate, known as global warming or climate change. Emissions of gases that induce global warming are attributable to human activities associated with industrial/manufacturing, agriculture, utilities, transportation, and residential land uses. Transportation is responsible for 41 percent of the State's greenhouse gas emissions, followed by electricity generation. Emissions of CO2 and nitrous oxide (NOX) are byproducts of fossil fuel combustion. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, results from off -gassing associated with agricultural practices and landfills. Sinks of CO2, where CO2 is stored outside of the atmosphere, include uptake by vegetation and dissolution into the ocean. The following provides a description of each of the greenhouse gases and their global warming potential. Water Vapor Water vapor is the most abundant, important, and variable GHG in the atmosphere. Water vapor is not considered a pollutant; in the atmosphere it maintains a climate necessary for life. Changes in its concentration are primarily considered a result of climate feedbacks related to the warming of the atmosphere rather than a direct result of industrialization. The feedback loop in which water is involved is critically important to projecting future climate change. As the temperature of the atmosphere rises, more water is evaporated from ground storage (rivers, oceans, reservoirs, soil). Because the air is warmer, the relative humidity can be higher (in essence, the air is able to "hold" more water when it is warmer), leading to more water vapor in the atmosphere. As a GHG, the higher La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-1 August 2016 785 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS concentration of water vapor is then able to absorb more thermal indirect energy radiated from the Earth, thus further warming the atmosphere. The warmer atmosphere can then hold more water vapor and so on and so on. This is referred to as a "positive feedback loop." The extent to which this positive feedback loop will continue is unknown as there is also dynamics that put the positive feedback loop in check. As an example, when water vapor increases in the atmosphere, more of it will eventually also condense into clouds, which are more able to reflect incoming solar radiation (thus allowing less energy to reach the Earth's surface and heat it up). Carbon Dioxide (CO2) The natural production and absorption of CO2 is achieved through the terrestrial biosphere and the ocean. However, humankind has altered the natural carbon cycle by burning coal, oil, natural gas, and wood. Since the industrial revolution began in the mid-1700s. Each of these activities has increased in scale and distribution. CO2 was the first GHG demonstrated to be increasing in atmospheric concentration with the first conclusive measurements being made in the last half of the 20th century. Prior to the industrial revolution, concentrations were fairly stable at 280 parts per million (ppm). The International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) indicates that concentrations were 379 ppm in 2005, an increase of more than 30 percent. Left unchecked, the IPCC projects that concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is projected to increase to a minimum of 540 ppm by 2100 as a direct result of anthropogenic sources. This could result in an average global temperature rise of at least two degrees Celsius or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Methane (CH4) CH4 is an extremely effective absorber of radiation, although its atmospheric concentration is less than that of CO2. Its lifetime in the atmosphere is brief (10 to 12 years), compared to some other GHGs (such as CO2, N20, and CFCs. CH4 has both natural and anthropogenic sources. It is released as part of the biological processes in low oxygen environments, such as in swamplands or in rice production (at the roots of the plants). Over the last 50 years, human activities such as growing rice, raising cattle, using natural gas, and mining coal have added to the atmospheric concentration of methane. Other anthropocentric sources include fossil -fuel combustion and biomass burning. Nitrous Oxide (N2O) Concentrations of N20 also began to rise at the beginning of the industrial revolution. In 1998, the global concentration of this GHG was documented at 314 parts per billion (ppb). N20 is produced by microbial processes in soil and water, including those reactions which occur in fertilizer containing nitrogen. In addition to agricultural sources, some industrial processes (fossil fuel -fired power plants, nylon production, nitric acid production, and vehicle emissions) also contribute to its atmospheric load. It is also commonly used as an aerosol spray propellant, (i.e., in whipped cream bottles, in potato chip bags to keep chips fresh, and in rocket engines and in race cars). La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-2 August 2016 786 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) CFCs are gases formed synthetically by replacing all hydrogen atoms in methane or ethane (C2H6) with chlorine and/or fluorine atoms. CFCs are nontoxic, nonflammable, insoluble, and chemically unreactive in the troposphere (the level of air at the Earth's surface). CFCs have no natural source, but were first synthesized in 1928. It was used for refrigerants, aerosol propellants, and cleaning solvents. Due to the discovery that they are able to destroy stratospheric ozone, a global effort to halt their production was undertaken and in 1989 the European Community agreed to ban CFCs by 2000 and subsequent treaties banned CFCs worldwide by 2010. This effort was extremely successful, and the levels of the major CFCs are now remaining level or declining. However, their long atmospheric lifetimes mean that some of the CFCs will remain in the atmosphere for over 100 years. Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) HFCs are synthetic man-made chemicals that are used as a substitute for CFCs. Out of all the GHGs, they are one of three groups with the highest global warming potential. The HFCs with the largest measured atmospheric abundances are (in order), HFC-23 (CHF3), HFC-134a (CF3CH2F), and HFC-152a (CH3CHF2). Prior to 1990, the only significant emissions were HFC-23. HFC-134a use is increasing due to its use as a refrigerant. Concentrations of HFC-23 and HFC-134a in the atmosphere are now about 10 parts per trillion (ppt) each. Concentrations of HFC-152a are about 1 ppt. HFCs are manmade for applications such as automobile air conditioners and refrigerants. Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) PFCs have stable molecular structures and do not break down through the chemical processes in the lower atmosphere. High-energy ultraviolet rays about 60 kilometers above Earth's surface are able to destroy the compounds. Because of this, PFCs have very long lifetimes, between 10,000 and 50,000 years. Two common PFCs are tetrafluoromethane (CF4) and hexafluoroethane (C2F6). Concentrations of CF4 in the atmosphere are over 70 ppt. The two main sources of PFCs are primary aluminum production and semiconductor manufacturing. Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) SF6 is an inorganic, odorless, colorless, nontoxic, nonflammable gas. SF6 has the highest global warming potential of any gas evaluated; 23,900 times that of CO2. Concentrations in the 1990s were about 4 ppt. Sulfur hexafluoride is used for insulation in electric power transmission and distribution equipment, in the magnesium industry, in semiconductor manufacturing, and as a tracer gas for leak detection. Aerosols Aerosols are particles emitted into the air through burning biomass (plant material) and fossil fuels. Aerosols can warm the atmosphere by absorbing and emitting heat and can cool the atmosphere by reflecting light. Cloud formation can also be affected by aerosols. Sulfate aerosols are emitted when La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-3 August 2016 787 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS fuel containing sulfur is burned. Black carbon (or soot) is emitted during biomass burning due to the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels. Particulate matter regulation has been lowering aerosol concentrations in the United States; however, global concentrations are likely increasing Global Warming Potential (GWP) GHGs have varying global warming potential (GWP). The global warming potential is the potential of a gas or aerosol to trap heat in the atmosphere; it is the cumulative radiative forcing effects of a gas over a specified time horizon resulting from the emission of a unit mass of gas relative to the reference gas, CO2. One teragram of carbon dioxide equivalent (Tg CO2e) is essentially the emissions of the gas multiplied by the global warming potential. One teragram is equal to one million metric tons. The carbon dioxide equivalent is a good way to assess emissions because it gives weight to the global warming potential of the gas. A summary of the atmospheric lifetime and the global warming potential of selected gases are summarized in Table 5.6-1, Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes. As shown in Table 5.6-1, the global warming potential of GHGs ranges from 1 to 22,800. Table 5.6-1 Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes' Gas Atmospheric Lifetime Global Warming Potential' (100 Year Horizon) Carbon Dioxide (CO2) —3 1 Methane (CH4) 12 28-36 Nitrous Oxide (NO) 114 298 Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) 1-270 12-14,800 Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) 2,600-50,000 7,390-12,200 Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) 740 17,200 Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) 3,200 22,800 Source: Inc. Air Quality & Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, Table 2, Kunzman Associates, March 2016 (See Appendix 8) Notes: 1. Source: http://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/gases.html 2. Compared to the same quantity of CO2 emissions. 3. Carbon dioxide's lifetime is poorly defined because the gas is not destroyed over time, but instead moves among different parts of the ocean —atmosphere —land system. Some of the excess carbon dioxide will be absorbed quickly (for example, by the ocean surface), but some will remain in the atmosphere for thousands of years, due in part to the very slow process by which carbon is transferred to ocean sediments. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-4 August 2016 788 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Regulatory Setting International In 1988, the United Nations established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to evaluate the impacts of global climate change and to develop strategies that nations could implement to curtail global climate change. In 1992, the United States joined other countries around the world in signing the United Nations' Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) agreement with the goal of controlling GHG emissions. As a result, the Climate Change Action Plan was developed to address the reduction of GHGs in the United States. The plan consists of more than 50 voluntary programs. Additionally, the Montreal Protocol was originally signed in 1987 and substantially amended in 1990 and 1992. The Montreal Protocol stipulates that the production and consumption of compounds that deplete ozone in the stratosphere —CFCs, halons, carbon tetrachloride, and methyl chloroform — were to be phased out, with the first three by the year 2000 and methyl chloroform by 2005. Federal The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for setting and enforcing the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for atmospheric pollutants. In Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency (Docket No. 05-1120), argued November 29, 2006 and decided April 2, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court held that not only did the EPA have authority to regulate greenhouse gases, but the EPA's reasons for not regulating this area did not fit the statutory requirements. As such, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the EPA should be required to regulate CO2 and other greenhouse gases as pollutants under the federal Clean Air Act (CAA). In response to the FY2008 Consolidations Appropriations Act (H.R. 2764; Public Law 110-161), EPA proposed a rule on March 10, 2009 that requires mandatory reporting of GHG emissions from large sources in the United States. On September 22, 2009, the Final Mandatory Reporting of GHG Rule was signed and published in the Federal Register on October 30, 2009. The rule became effective on December 29, 2009. This rule requires suppliers of fossil fuels or industrial GHGs, manufacturers of vehicles and engines, and facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons or more per year of GHG emissions to submit annual reports to EPA. On December 7, 2009, the EPA Administrator signed two distinct findings under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act. One is an endangerment finding that finds concentrations of the six GHGs in the atmosphere threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations. The other is a cause or contribute finding, that finds emissions from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines contribute to the GHG pollution which threatens public health and welfare. These actions will not themselves impose any requirements on industry or other entities. However, it is a La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-5 August 2016 789 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS prerequisite to finalizing the EPA's proposed GHG emission standards for light -duty vehicles, which were jointly proposed by the EPA and Department of Transportation on September 15, 2009. In response to the FY2008 Consolidations Appropriations Act (H.R. 2764; Public Law 110-161), EPA proposed a rule on March 10, 2009 that requires mandatory reporting of GHG emissions from large sources in the United States. On September 22, 2009, the Final Mandatory Reporting of GHG Rule was signed and published in the Federal Register on October 30, 2009. The rule became effective on December 29, 2009. This rule requires suppliers of fossil fuels or industrial GHGs, manufacturers of vehicles and engines, and facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons or more per year of GHG emissions to submit annual reports to EPA. On December 7, 2009, the EPA Administrator signed two distinct findings under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act. One is an endangerment finding that finds concentrations of the six GHGs in the atmosphere threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations. The other is a cause or contribute finding, that finds emissions from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines contribute to the GHG pollution which threatens public health and welfare. These actions will not themselves impose any requirements on industry or other entities. However, it is a prerequisite to finalizing the EPA's proposed GHG emission standards for light -duty vehicles, which were jointly proposed by the EPA and Department of Transportation on September 15, 2009. State California Air Resources Board The CARB also proposed interim statewide CEQA thresholds for GHG emissions and released Recommended Approaches for Setting Interim Significance Thresholds for Greenhouse Gases under the California Environmental Quality Act, on October 24, 2008. The State currently has no regulations that establish ambient air quality standards for GHGs. However, the State has passed laws directing CARB to develop actions to reduce GHG emissions, which as applicable to the project, are listed below. Assembly Bill 1493 California Assembly Bill 1493 (also known as the Pavley Bill, in reference to its author Fran Pavley) was enacted on July 22, 2002 and required CARB to develop and adopt regulations that reduce GHGs emitted by passenger vehicles and light duty trucks. In 2004, CARB approved the "Pavley I" regulations limiting the amount of GHGs that may be released from new passenger automobiles that are being phased in between model years 2009 through 2016. This regulation will reduce GHG emissions by 30 percent from 2002 levels by 2016. The second set of regulations "Pavley 11" is currently in development and will be phased in between model years 2017 through 2025 and will reduce emissions by 45 percent by the year 2020. The Pavley 11 standards are being developed by La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-6 August 2016 790 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS linking the GHG emissions and formerly separate toxic tailpipe emissions standards previously known as the "LEV III" (third stage of the Low Emission Vehicle standards) into a single regulatory framework. In 2005, the CARB submitted a "waiver" request to the EPA in order to implement the GHG standards and in March of 2008, the U.S. EPA denied the request. However, in June 2009, the decision was reversed and the U.S. EPA granted California the authority to implement the GHG standards for passenger cars, pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles. In September 2009, the Pavley I regulations were adopted by CARB. Senate Bills 1078, 107, and X1-2 and Executive Orders S-14-08 and S-21-09 Senate Bill 1078 (SB 1078) requires retail sellers of electricity, including investor -owned utilities and community choice aggregators, to provide at least 20 percent of their supply from renewable sources by 2017. Senate Bill 107 (SB 107) changed the target date to 2010. Executive Order S-14-08 was signed on November 2008 and expands the State's Renewable Energy Standard to 33 percent renewable energy by 2020. Executive Order S-21-09 directed CARB to adopt regulations by July 31, 2010 to enforce S-14-08. Senate Bill X1-2 codifies the 33 percent renewable energy requirement by 2020. Executive Order S-3-05 The California Governor issued Executive Order S-3-05, GHG Emission, in June 2005, which established the following reduction targets: • 2010: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 2000 levels • 2020: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels • 2050: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels. The executive order directed the secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CaIEPA) to coordinate a multi -agency effort to reduce GHG emissions to the target levels. To comply with the Executive Order, the secretary of CaIEPA created the California Climate Action Team (CAT), made up of members from various state agencies and commissions. The team released its first report in March 2006. The report proposed to achieve the targets by building on the voluntary actions of businesses, local governments, and communities and through State incentive and regulatory programs. California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 6 CCR Title 24, Part 6: California's Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24) were first established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California's energy consumption. The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficiency technologies and methods. Although it was not La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-7 August 2016 791 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS originally intended to reduce GHG emissions, electricity production by fossil fuels results in GHG emissions and energy efficient buildings require less electricity. Therefore, increased energy efficiency results in decreased GHG emissions. The Energy Commission adopted 2008 Standards on April 23, 2008 and Building Standards Commission approved them for publication on September 11, 2008. These updates became effective on August 1, 2009. All buildings for which an application for a building permit is submitted on or after January 1, 2014 must follow the 2013 standards. The 2013 commercial standards are estimated to be 30 percent more efficient than the 2008 commercial standards; 2013 residential standards are approximately 25 percent more efficient. Energy efficient buildings require less electricity; therefore, increased energy efficiency reduces fossil fuel consumption and decreases greenhouse gas emissions. California Green Building Standards On January 12, 2010, the State Building Standards Commission unanimously adopted updates to the California Green Building Standards Code, which went into effect on January 1, 2011. The Code is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all residential, commercial and school buildings. The California Green Building Standards Code does not prevent a local jurisdiction from adopting a more stringent code as state law provides methods for local enhancements. The Code recognizes that many jurisdictions have developed existing construction and demolition ordinances, and defers to them as the ruling guidance provided they provide a minimum 50-percent diversion requirement. The code also provides exemptions for areas not served by construction and demolition recycling infrastructure. State building code provides the minimum standard that buildings need to meet in order to be certified for occupancy. Enforcement is generally through the local building official. CCR Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards (Title 24) became effective in 2001 in response to continued efforts to reduce GHG emissions associated with energy consumption. CCR Title 24, Part 11 now require that new buildings reduce water consumption, employ building commissioning to increase building system efficiencies, divert construction waste from landfills, and install low pollutant -emitting finish materials. One focus of CCR Title 24, Part 11 is water conservation measures, which reduce GHG emissions by reducing electrical consumption associated with pumping and treating water. CCR Title 24, Part 11 has approximately 52 nonresidential mandatory measures and an additional 130 provisions for optional use. Some key mandatory measures for commercial occupancies include specified parking for clean air vehicles, a 20 percent reduction of potable water use within buildings, a 50 percent construction waste diversion from landfills, use of building finish materials that emit low levels of volatile organic compounds, and commissioning for new, nonresidential buildings over 10,000 square feet. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-8 August 2016 792 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Assembly Bill 32 In 2006, the California State Legislature adopted Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. AB 32 requires CARB, to adopt rules and regulations that would achieve GHG emissions equivalent to statewide levels in 1990 by 2020 through an enforceable statewide emission cap which will be phased in starting in 2012. Emission reductions shall include carbon sequestration projects that would remove carbon from the atmosphere and best management practices that are technologically feasible and cost effective. Senate Bill 375 Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) was adopted September 2008 and aligns regional transportation planning efforts, regional GHG emission reduction targets, and land use and housing allocation. SB 375 requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) to adopt a sustainable community's strategy (SCS) or alternate planning strategy (APS) that will prescribe land use allocation in that MPOs Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). CARB, in consultation with each MPO, will provide each affected region with reduction targets for GHGs emitted by passenger cars and light trucks in the region for the years 2020 and 2035. These reduction targets will be updated every eight years but can be updated every four years if advancements in emissions technologies affect the reduction strategies to achieve the targets. CARB is also charged with reviewing each MPO's sustainable community's strategy or alternate planning strategy for consistency with its assigned targets. Regional - South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) The SCAQMD is the agency principally responsible for comprehensive air pollution control in the Coachella Valley. To that end, as a regional agency, the SCAQMD works directly with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), county transportation commissions, and local governments and cooperates actively with all federal and state agencies. The SCAQMD develops rules and regulations, establishes permitting requirements for stationary sources, inspects emission sources, and enforces such measures through educational programs or fines, when necessary. The SCAQMD is directly responsible for reducing emissions from stationary, mobile, and indirect sources. It has responded to this requirement by preparing a sequence of AQMPs. A revised draft of the 2012 AQMP was released on September, 2012, was adopted by the SCAQMD Board on December 7, 2012, and was adopted by CARB via Resolution 13-3 on January 25, 2013. The 2012 AQMP builds upon the approaches taken in the 2007 AQMP for the attainment of federal PM and ozone standards, and highlights the significant amount of reductions needed and the need to engage in interagency coordinated planning of mobile sources to meet all of the federal criteria pollutant standards. Compared with the 2007 AQMP, the 2012 AQMP utilizes revised emissions inventory projections that use 2008 as the base year. Since the 2007 AQMP was finalized new area La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-9 August 2016 793 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS source categories such as liquid propane gas (LPG) transmission losses, storage tank and pipeline cleaning and degassing, and architectural colorants, were created and included in the emissions inventories. Composting waste was revised and now includes the emissions from green waste composting covered under SCAQMD Rule 1133.3. The 2012 AQMP also includes analysis of several additional sources of GHG emissions such as landfills and could also assist in reaching the GHG target goals in the AB32 Scoping Plan. SCAQMD Working Group Since neither CARB nor the OPR has developed GHG emissions threshold, the SCAQMD formed a Working Group to develop significance thresholds related to GHG emissions. At the September 28, 2010 Working Group meeting, the SCAQMD released its most current version of the draft GHG emissions thresholds, which recommends a tiered approach that provides a quantitative annual thresholds of 10,000 MTCO2e for industrial uses. In order to assist local agencies with direction on GHG emissions, the SCAQMD organized a working group and adopted Rules 2700, 2701, 2702, and 3002 which are described below. Rules 2700 and 2701 The SCAQMD adopted Rules 2700 and 2701 on December 5, 2008, which establishes the administrative structure for a voluntary program designed to quantify GHG emission reductions. Rule 2700 establishes definitions for the various terms used in Regulation XXVII — Global Climate Change. Rule 2701 provides specific protocols for private parties to follow to generate certified GHG emission reductions for projects within the district. Approved protocols include forest projects, urban tree planting, and manure management. The SCAQMD is currently developing additional protocols for other reduction measures. For a GHG emission reduction project to qualify, it must be verified and certified by the SCAQMD Executive Officer, who has 60 days to approve or deny the Plan to reduce GHG emissions. Upon approval of the Plan, the Executive Officer issues required to issue a certified receipt of the GHG emission reductions within 90 days. Rule 2702 The SCAQMD adopted Rule 2702 on February 6, 2009, which establishes a voluntary air quality investment program from which SCAQMD can collect funds from parties that desire certified GHG emission reductions, pool those funds, and use them to purchase or fund GHG emission reduction projects within two years, unless extended by the Governing Board. Priority will be given to projects that result in co -benefit emission reductions of GHG emissions and criteria or toxic air pollutants within environmental justice areas. Further, this voluntary program may compete with the cap -and - trade program identified for implementation in CARB's Scoping Plan, or a federal cap and trade program. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-10 August 2016 794 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Rule 3002 The SCAQMD amended Rule 3002 on November 5, 2010 to include facilities that emit greater than 100,000 tons per year of CO2e are required to apply for a Title V permit by July 1, 2011. A Title V permit is for facilities that are considered major sources of emissions. Although the SCAQMD is responsible for regional air quality planning efforts, it does not have the authority to directly regulate air quality issues associated with plans and new development projects throughout the South Coast Air Basin. Instead, this is controlled through local jurisdictions in accordance with the CEQA. In order to assist local jurisdictions with air quality compliance issues the CEQA Air Quality Handbook (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook), prepared by the SCAQMD, 1993, with the most current updates found at the agency's website (http://www.agmd.gov/ceqa/hdbk.html), and was developed in accordance with the projections and programs of the AQMP. The purpose of the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook is to assist Lead Agencies, as well as consultants, project proponents, and other interested parties in evaluating a proposed project's potential air quality impacts. Specifically, the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook explains the procedures that the SCAQMD recommends be followed for the environmental review process required by CEQA. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook provides direction on how to evaluate potential air quality impacts, how to determine whether these impacts are significant, and how to mitigate these impacts. The SCAQMD intends that by providing this guidance, the air quality impacts of plans and development proposals will be analyzed accurately and consistently throughout the South Coast Air Basin, and adverse impacts will be minimized. Regional - Southern California Association of Governments The SCAG is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino and Imperial Counties and addresses regional issues relating to transportation, the economy, community development and the environment. SCAG is the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the majority of the southern California region and is the largest MPO in the nation. With respect to air quality planning, SCAG has prepared the Regional Transportation Plan and Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP), which addresses regional development and growth forecasts. These plans form the basis for the land use and transportation components of the AQMP, which are utilized in the preparation of air quality forecasts and in the consistency analysis included in the AQMP. The Regional Transportation Plan, Regional Transportation Improvement Plan, and AQMP are based on projections originating within the City and County General Plans. Local — City of La Quinta La Quinta has adopted a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan that includes a comprehensive Inventory of greenhouse gas emissions generated citywide, including those generated by local government activities. Future emissions of greenhouse gases are projected, reduction targets set, and policies La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-11 August 2016 795 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS and programs are proposed as part of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan. To be consistent with AB 32 and Executive Order S-3-05, the reduction target is to achieve 1990 level emissions by 2020, and 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. As part of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan, the City conducted a City-wide and municipal specific inventory. Given that accurate data for 1990 was not readily available and there were some disadvantages to back -casting, the preferred approach was to use 2005 as the base year, with a reduction target of 10 percent below 2005 levels. To quantify the reductions that will be necessary in order to achieve the target, a 2020 forecast under business as usual conditions was conducted. The 2020 forecast shows what the City-wide and municipal -specific GHG emissions would be, assuming growth and development, under business as usual conditions (that is to say under current operating conditions). The difference between emissions forecast for 2020 and the reduction target emission level of 10 percent below 2005 levels yields the emission quantity required to achieve the target. Achieving a reduction target below 2005 levels requires that all new development not contribute emissions, and existing GHG emitters reduce emissions by over 10 percent. Alternatively, and more practically, new development limits emissions to the greatest extent feasible, and existing emitters make up the difference needed to achieve targeted reductions through retrofits, equipment upgrades, and conservation. Given that the City of La Quinta Is approximately 80 percent built out, most of the City's emissions are, and will be generated by existing development. Reductions achieved for this sector would yield the greatest results. Consistent with the statewide effort to reduce emission levels to 80 percent of 1990 missions, the 2035 target relative to 2005 is set at 28 percent. The City intends to reduce emission levels to 28 percent of 2005 levels by the year 2035. The City is committed to leading by example and has identified a number of policies and programs that will be enacted to curb GHG emissions. Efforts include the development and implementation of programs; collection, review and monitoring of data; and periodic generation of reports to track progress towards achieving reduction targets. The goal is to reduce GHG emissions citywide in an ongoing effort that will require staff time, funding, community participation and other resources. The effort to reduce GHG emissions and successful implementation of programs to achieve that goal will result in a more livable vibrant community where enhanced air quality economic vitality, and sustainable growth is realized. For new projects in the Village Build -out Plan project area that are consistent with the General Plan, City staff can assist project applicants in identifying reduction measures and incorporating design features that implement the GHG Reduction Plan. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-12 August 2016 796 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 5.6.3 Applicable Goals and Policies GOAL AQ-1 A reduction in all air emissions generated within the City. Policy AQ-1.7 Greenhouse gas emissions associated with a development project shall demonstrate adherence to the City's GHG Reduction Plan. Policy AQ-1.8 The City shall adopt a comprehensive greenhouse gas reduction plan that sets forth reduction targets, timelines, and measures to achieve targets. Program AQ-1.8.a: Implement the GHG reduction measures detailed in the GHG Reduction Plan. GOAL H-6.1 Provide a regulatory framework that facilitates and encourages energy and water conservation through sustainable site planning, project design, and green technologies and building materials. Policy H-6.1 Promote higher density and compact developments that increase energy efficiency and reduce land consumption. Policy H-6.2 Facilitate housing development and rehabilitation that conserves natural resources and minimizes greenhouse gas emissions. Policy H-6.3 Encourage and enforce green building regulations or incentives that do not serve as constraints to the development or rehabilitation of housing. Policy H-6.4 Focus sustainability efforts on measures and techniques that also assist the occupant in reducing energy costs, therefore reducing housing costs. Policy H-6.5 Use and encourage emerging technologies to reduce high demands for electricity and natural gas including use of passive solar devices and where feasible other renewable energy technologies (e.g., biomass, wind, and geothermal). Program H-6.5.a: Green and Sustainable La Quinta Program - The City Council has identified the conservation of natural resources as a critical concern in La Quinta. In July 2007 the City La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-13 August 2016 797 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Council directed staff to initiate the development of the Green and Sustainable La Quinta Program, a comprehensive program to reduce the environmental impact of existing structures, rehabilitation efforts, and new construction. Progress to date includes participating in local energy reduction and water conservation programs. The formal Green and Sustainable Program may include energy conserving standards for street widths, streetscapes, and landscaping to reduce heat loss. Energy consumption in existing homes could be improved by incentivizing energy ---efficient retrofits prior to the resale of homes. • Objective: Implement green goals, policies, and programs that accurately represent the City's direction in resource conservation and minimizing greenhouse gas emissions. Implement design standards for residential and commercial structures that encourage solar protection to directly result in energy conservation. • Timing: As projects are proposed • Funding Source: General Fund • Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department Policy CIR-2.2 Encourage reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by reducing vehicle miles traveled and vehicle hours of delay by increasing or encouraging the use of alternative modes and transportation technologies, and implement and manage a hierarchy of Complete Street multimodal transportation infrastructure and programs to deliver improved mobility and reduce GHG emissions. 5.6.4 Project Impact Analysis Thresholds of Significance The following thresholds or criteria are derived from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, and are used to determine the level of potential effect. The significance determination is based on the recommended criteria set forth in Section 15064 of the CEQA Guidelines. For analysis purposes, build - out of the La Village would have a significant effect on greenhouse gas emissions if it is determined that the project will: a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment; or b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-14 August 2016 798 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS a. Generate greenhouse gases, either directly or indirectly Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will result in the emission of greenhouse gases through the combustion of fossil fuels during operation of vehicles, the generation of electricity at power plants, combustion of natural gas, and the transportation of water. GHG emissions were calculated based on the parameters described above. A summary of the results are shown in Table 5.6-2, Unmitigated Project -Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Table 5.6-2 Unmitigated Project -Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions Category Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons/Year) Bio-0O2 NonBio-CO2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Area Sources' 0.00 886.86 886.86 0.03 0.02 892.47 Energy Usage 0.00 11,113.17 11,113.17 0.25 0.07 11,138.90 Mobile Sources3 0.00 22,592.75 22,592.75 0.63 0.00 22,605.94 Solid Waste 285.36 0.00 285.36 16.86 0.00 639.52 Waters 44.22 1,602.54 1,646.76 4.58 0.11 1,778.51 Construction 0.00 866.03 866.03 0.06 0.00 867.31 Total Emissions 1 329.59 1 37,061.35 37,390.94 1 22.41 1 0.20 37,922.64 Draft SCAQMD Threshold 3,000 Exceeds Threshold? Yes Emissions per Service Population (SP) 7.4 SCAQMD 2035 Target Service Population (SP) Threshold (MTCO2e/SP/year) 3.0 Exceeds Threshold? Yes Source: Inc. Air Quality & Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, Table 12, Kunzman Associates, March 2016 (Appendix B) Notes: 1. Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscape equipment. 2. Energy usage consist of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage. 3. Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles. 4. Solid waste includes the CO2 and CH4 emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills. 5. Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for transport of water and processing of wastewater. 6. Construction GHG emissions CO2e based on a 30 year amortization rate. As shown in Table 5.6-2 the project's unmitigated emissions for buildout Year 2035 would be 37,922.64 MTCO2e per year with 7.4 MTCO2e/SP/year. According to the threshold shown in Table 5.6-2, a cumulative global climate change impact would occur if the GHG emissions created from the on -going operations would exceed the screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons per year of CO2e and the SCAQMD 2035 Target Service Population Threshold of 3.0 MTCO2e/SP/year. Because the emissions exceed SCAQMD thresholds, mitigation will be required and will be focused primarily on implementation of California Green Building Standards Code. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-15 August 2016 799 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS California Green Building Standards Code On January 12, 2010, the State Building Standards Commission unanimously adopted updates to the California Green Building Standards Code, which went into effect on January 1, 2011. The Code is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all residential, commercial and school buildings. The California Green Building Standards Code does not prevent a local jurisdiction from adopting a more stringent code as state law provides methods for local enhancements. The Code recognizes that many jurisdictions have developed existing construction and demolition ordinances, and defers to them as the ruling guidance provided they provide a minimum 50-percent diversion requirement. The Code also provides exemptions for areas not served by construction and demolition recycling infrastructure. State building code provides the minimum standard that buildings need to meet in order to be certified for occupancy. Enforcement is generally through the local building official. The California Green Building Standards Code (Code section in parentheses) requires: • Water Efficiency and Conservation [Indoor Water Use (4.303.1)]. Fixtures and fixture fittings reducing the overall use of potable water within the building by at least 20 percent shall be provided. • Water Efficiency and Conservation [Outdoor Water Use (4.304.1)]. Irrigation Controllers. Automatic irrigation system controllers for landscaping provided by the builder and installed at the time of final inspection. • Construction Waste Reduction of at least 50 percent (4.408.1). Recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 50 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste in accordance with either Section 4.408.2, 4.408.3 or 4.408.4; OR meet a more stringent local construction and demolition waste management ordinance. Documentation is required per Section 4.408.5. • Materials pollution control (4.504.1 — 4.504.6). Low -pollutant emitting interior finish materials such as paints, carpet, vinyl flooring and particleboard. • Installer and Special Inspector Qualifications (702.1-702.2). Mandatory special installer inspector qualifications for installation and inspection of energy systems (e.g., heat furnace, air conditioner, mechanical equipment). The data provided in Table 5.6-3, Year 2035 Mitigated Project -Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions, shows that the Village Build -out Plan's mitigated year 2035 emissions would be approximately 27,111.64 metric tons of CO2e per year; and at 5.3 MTCO2e/SP/year, would still exceed the SCAQMD 2035 Target Service Population threshold of 3.0 MTCO2e/SP/year for projects. The mitigated emissions values also incorporate the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association - based land use and site enhancement measures available for reductions through CalEEMod. However, as the mitigated project -related GHG emissions exceed the Tier 4 SCAQMD 2035 target service population La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-16 August 2016 :11 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS threshold, impacts from project -related GHGs through implementation of the Village Build -out Plan are considered to be significant and unavoidable. Table 5.6-3 Year 2035 Mitigated Project -Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions Category Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons/Year) Bio-0O2 NonBio-CO2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Area Sources' 0.00 886.86 886.86 0.03 0.02 892.47 Energy Usage 0.00 9,612.40 9,612.40 0.22 0.06 9,634.36 Mobile Sources' 0.00 13,884.16 13,884.16 0.40 0.00 13,892.59 Solid Waste' 142.68 0.00 142.68 8.43 0.00 319.76 Water' 35.38 1,364.21 1,399.59 1 3.66 1 0.09 1,505.15 Construction 0.00 866.03 866.03 0.06 0.00 867.31 Total Emissions 178.06 26,613.66 26,791.72 12.81 0.16 27,111.64 Project's Percent Reduction from 2005 Baseline 54.2 Percent Reduction Threshold from GHG Reduction Plan 28 Meets Reduction Threshold? Yes Emissions per Service Population (SP) 5.3 SCAQMD 2035 Target Service Population (SP) Threshold (MTCO2e/SP/year) 3.0 Exceeds Threshold? Yes Source: Inc. Air Quality & Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, Table 14, Kunzman Associates, March 2016 Notes: 1. Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscape equipment. 2. Energy usage consist of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage. 3. Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles. 4. Solid waste includes the CO2 and CH4 emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills. 5. Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for transport of water and processing of wastewater. 6. Construction GHG emissions CO2e based on opening year emissions and a 30 year amortization rate. b. Conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases The City of La Quinta Draft Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan is the applicable plan adopted by the City for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. To determine if the project's GHG emissions will conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs, the project's year 2035 mitigated and regulated emissions (Table 5.6-3 above) were compared to the project's baseline (2005) GHG emissions as shown in Table 5.6-4, Year 2035 Baseline Project- Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions, to ensure that the project's year 2035 emissions are 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2035. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-17 August 2016 801 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Table 5.6-4 Year 2005 Baseline Project -Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions Category Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons/Year) Bio-0O2 NonBio-CO2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Area Sources' 0.00 886.86 886.86 0.04 0.02 892.67 Energy Usage 0.00 11,113.17 11,113.17 0.25 0.07 11,138.90 Mobile Sources3 0.00 43,846.81 43,846.81 3.29 0.00 43,915.97 Solid Waste 285.36 0.00 285.36 16.86 0.00 639.52 Waters 1 44.22 1,602.54 1 1,646.76 1 4.58 1 0.11 1 1,778.51 Construction 0.00 866.03 866.03 0.06 0.00 867.31 Total Emissions 329.59 58,315.42 58,645.00 25.09 0.20 59,232.89 Source: Inc. Air Quality & Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, Table 13, Kunzman Associates, March 2016 Notes: 1. Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscape equipment. 2. Energy usage consist of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage. 3. Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles. 4. Solid waste includes the CO2 and CH4 emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills. 5. Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for transport of water and processing of wastewater. 6. Construction GHG emissions CO2e based on opening year emissions and a 30 year amortization rate. The baseline emissions were estimated only for operations and in a similar manner as described above; however, the operational year was selected as 2005 based on the City of La Quinta GHG Reduction Plan methodology. No reductions, emissions -reducing design features, or mitigation were used to run the year 2005 analysis. The summary of baseline emissions in Table 5.6-4 included the construction -related GHG emissions for year 2035 as calculated for opening year. The project's emissions for the baseline year would be 59,232.89 MTCO2e per year as opposed to the project's mitigated 2035 emissions which would be lowered to 27,111.64 MTCO2e per year. With mitigation and compliance with regulation (such as Pavley, the Renewable Energy Standard, compliance with Green Building Standards, and 2013 Title 24 standards [approximately 25 percent more efficient than 2008 Title 24 standards for residential uses) etc.], the Village Build -out Plan year 2035 mitigated emissions would be reduced by 54.2 percent from baseline (2005) emissions; which meets the City of La Quinta GHG Reduction Plan threshold of a 28 percent reduction from baseline emissions by 2035. Therefore, with incorporation of Mitigation Measures GHG-1 through GHG-7, implementation of the Village Build -out Plan would maintain consistency with Goal AQ-1 and would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-18 August 2016 :e. ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 5.6.5 Cumulative Impacts The evaluation of greenhouse gasses for a project is an evaluation of a project's contribution to global climate change. Therefore, no additional analysis is required. 5.6.6 Mitigation Measures GHG-1 Project applicants shall provide sidewalks within the project boundary and along the off - site roadway improvements where these are lacking. GHG-2 Project applicants shall ensure that all building structures meet or exceed 2013 Title 24, Part 6 Standards and meet Green Building Code Standards, or more stringent standards if in place at the time building permits are issued. GHG-3 Project applicants shall ensure that all faucets, toilets and showers installed in the proposed structures utilize low -flow fixtures that would reduce indoor water demand by 20 percent per CalGreen Standards to the satisfaction of the Building Department. GHG-4 Project applicants shall ensure that ENERGY STAR -compliant appliances are installed where appliances are required on -site. GHG-5 Project applicants shall implement recycling programs that reduce waste to landfills by a minimum of 75 percent. GHG-6 Project applicants shall install high -efficiency lighting be installed that is at least 10 percent more efficient than standard lighting. GHG-7 To the extent feasible, project applicants shall use paints and coatings with a VOC content lower than SCAQMD Rule 1113 requires for application to surfaces of residential dwelling units and commercial units within project boundaries. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting in New Development Projects A. A report of emission reductions achieved shall be provided in the annual review of the General Plan. Responsible Parties: Planning Division and SCAQMD. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-19 August 2016 803 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.6 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 5.6.7 Level of Significance after Mitigation A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted with the adoption of the General Plan. Overriding considerations 3 and 4 specifically apply to Greenhouse Gasses as follows: 3. Impacts identified as significant are generally associated with normal growth and progress and would be much more severe without implementation of the proposed General Plan update. 4. Implementation of the General Plan update will further enhance the quality of life necessary to attract new residents, businesses and visitors to the City, and will generally promote increased investment and development, jobs associated with new and/or expanded construction, and the provision of public services and facilities for a larger population base, and further economic development within the City. The La Quinta Village EIR will utilize these overriding conditions from the General Plan EIR. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.6-20 August 2016 804 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 5.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 5.7.1 Introduction The La Quinta Village serves as the traditional core of the City and consists of typical downtown land uses including residential, commercial, offices, community facilities, recreational, and vacant land. In any urbanized area, the potential for exposure to hazards and hazardous material is always present due to commerce, transportation and distribution of products, and use of hazardous materials. The Village is not immune to these hazards, as numerous businesses and households use hazardous materials for commerce and daily living, and also from the transport of hazardous waste materials (e.g. waste from doctor's offices) through the City and region. This section assesses impacts associated with hazards and hazardous materials on new growth likely to occur as a result of implementing the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan. Sources used in the preparation of this section are identified in Chapter 9, References. 5.7.2 Existing Conditions Hazardous Materials Management Hazardous waste is any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge that is potentially dangerous to human health and the environment, including everyday commercial products, such as pesticides, cleaning fluids, and household sprays, as well as byproducts of manufacturing processes and materials used in doctor/dentist offices that may then be transported as bio-hazardous waste. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified hazardous waste into four types including listed wastes, characteristic wastes, universal wastes, and mixed wastes. Listed wastes include wastes from common manufacturing and industrial processes, waste from specific industries such as petroleum refining or pesticide manufacturing, and discarded commercial products. Characteristic wastes include non -listed wastes that exhibit ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, and toxicity. Universal wastes include items such as batteries, mercury -containing equipment, and fluorescent lamps and bulbs. Mixed wastes contain radioactive and hazardous waste components. All hazardous waste poses a threat to humans and the environment, and therefore is regulated by federal, state and local programs. Regulatory Setting Federal Programs The EPA has been given authority and responsibility to regulate hazardous waste by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA). Through the Act, the EPA is responsible for La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.7-1 August 2016 805 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS monitoring the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. Amendments to the RCRA, including the 1984 Federal Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments, and those established in 1986, forced the EPA to increase enforcement of underground storage tanks for petroleum and other hazardous substances, focus on waste minimization programs, such as phasing out hazardous wastes from landfills, and finally mandating corrective measures regarding the release of hazardous waste. More recent EPA efforts and responsibilities for managing hazardous waste include management of wastes from homeland security incidents. The Waste Management for Homeland Security Incidents Act requires EPA to provide technical support to Federal, state, local, and tribal authorities on waste management and cleanup efforts resulting from natural disasters, terrorist attacks, major accidents, and disease outbreaks. The main responsibility of the EPA is to promote pre -planning efforts to deal will hazardous waste disasters and encourage various stakeholders to prepare for natural and man- made disasters. The EPA is also required to review emergency response plans for Federal agencies, and participate in exercises with Federal, state, local and tribal emergency responders. State Programs The California Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPA) is a collection of state and regional agencies in charge of regulating hazardous waste. They are responsible for the administration, permits, inspection and enforcement of various environmental and emergency management programs, including the Underground Storage Tank Program, the Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act Program, Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans, and Hazardous Waste Generator and Onsite Hazardous Waste Treatment Programs. The California Environmental Protection Agency (CaIEPA) is responsible for administrating and certifying the CUPA's. Two state agencies that are also heavily involved with CUPA activities include the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) is responsible for protecting public health and the environment from hazardous waste generated in California. They regulate under the authority of the federal RCRA of 1976 and the California Health and Safety Code. The DTSC operates a variety of programs including the following: - Overseeing site cleanups at improperly managed waste sites. - Ensuring those who generate, handle, transport, store and dispose of hazardous waste do so properly. - Enforcement actions against those who fail to manage hazardous waste appropriately. - Exploring and promoting pollution prevention and encouraging reuse and recycling. - Evaluating soil, water and air samples at sites and developing new analytical methods - Practicing other environmental sciences, including toxicology, risk assessment, and technology development - Involving the public in DTSC's decision -making. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.7-2 August 2016 ON ATTACH M ENT 1 5.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DTSC is required to compile and update each year, or as appropriate, a list of hazardous waste sites pursuant to the Cortese Lists under Government Code Section 65962.5(a). The DTSC has created the EnviroStor database of properties throughout California that may be contaminated. There are no hazardous waste sites in La Quinta that are listed pursuant to Section 65962.5(a). The closest listed site is the Foster -Gardner facility in Coachella, located south of Avenue 50 between Highway 86 and Highway 111. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) is responsible for regulating wastewater discharges to surface waters and groundwater. This includes discharges from all construction, industrial, municipal, and agricultural activities. The SWRCB delegates these responsibilities to various regional water quality control boards throughout California. La Quinta falls under the jurisdiction of the Colorado River Basin Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 7 (RWQCB). The Colorado River Basin Regional Water Quality Control Board is responsible for overseeing corrective actions associated with leaks and improper disposal from underground storage tanks, such as gas station tanks, and provides assistance to County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health on underground storage leaks. Regional Programs The Riverside County Department of Environmental Health (DEH) provides programs and services related to protecting public health, safety and the environment. Within the DEH are two divisions, District Environmental Service, and Environmental Protection and Oversight. The Environmental Protection and Oversight Division (EPO) is responsible for handling and regulating hazardous materials, land use, water systems, underground storage tanks, solid waste and business emergency plans and is responsible for managing a list of all hazardous waste generators in the County. As of December 8, 2010, La Quinta had 50 generators of hazardous waste. Generators include golf courses, gas stations, cleaners, grocery stores, car dealerships and city maintenance facility yards. Emergency response in La Quinta involves numerous State, regional, local, and non-profit agencies whose goal is to prepare local residents for emergencies caused by natural or human incidents. The State of California passed the California Emergency Services Act in 1970 to provide the basic legal authorities for emergency management in the State. The Act created the Governor's Office of Emergency Services (OES), which serves as the lead agency for emergency management and to organize all levels of government, businesses, community organizations and volunteers to deal with local emergencies. The County of Riverside operates the Office of Emergency Services through Riverside County Fire Department. Riverside County OES is responsible for mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery activities from hazards and threats occurring in Riverside County. In order to coordinate efforts relating to hazardous materials management, the County has developed a Hazardous Waste Management Plan (HWMP), which addresses the proper disposal, La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.7-3 August 2016 807 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS processing, handling, storage and treatment of hazardous materials. The City has also adopted the HWMP and implements it at the local level. In the City, hazardous materials are limited to small quantity generators (those generating less than 1,000 kilograms of hazardous waste per month), ranging from individual households which store cleaning solutions and automotive products, to service stations and medical clinics, which may store or use larger quantities of hazardous materials. Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan All facilities in Riverside County that handle or store hazardous materials in a quantity determined by State law and regulation are to report such use or storage to the County of Riverside Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) and the DEH before the initiation of operation of their business. In Riverside County the CUPA is the Fire Department. The amount of detail required to be reported depends on whether or not a facility is subject to a State Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan (HMBEP) A HMBEP is a document containing detailed information on the storage of hazardous materials at a facility. Chapter 6.95 of the California Health & Safety Code (HSC) and Title 19, Division 2, of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) require that facilities which use or store such materials at or above reporting thresholds (see below) submit this information. The intent of the HMBEP is to satisfy federal and State Community Right -To -Know laws and provide detailed information for use by emergency responders. All persons at the facility who are qualified to serve as emergency coordinators must be thoroughly familiar with the contents and use of the HMBEP, with the operations and activities of the facility, and with the locations of all hazardous materials records maintained by the facility. The owner of a facility that would be subject to a HMBEP must prepare and submit a copy to the CUPA for each site that handles any individual hazardous material or mixture containing a hazardous material which has a quantity at any time during the reporting year equal to or greater than: • 500 pounds or more of any solid hazardous material [HSC §25503.5(a)] • For liquid hazardous materials: - More than 55 gallons of any type or 275 gallons aggregate quantity on site for lubricating oils as defined by HSC §25503.5(b)(2)(B): [HSC §25503.5(b)(2)(A)] - 55 gallons or more of any other liquid, including waste oil. [HSC §25503.5(a)] • For hazardous material gases: - More than 1,000 cubic feet (at standard temperature and pressure) of Oxygen, Nitrogen, or Nitrous Oxide stored/handled at a physician, dentist, podiatrist, veterinarian, or pharmacist's place of business. [HSC §25503.5(b)(1)] La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.7-4 August 2016 :s: ATTACH M ENT 1 5.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - More than 300 gallons of Propane used for the sole purpose of heating the employee working areas within the facility. [HSC §25503.5(b)] - 200 cubic feet or more of any other gas. [HSC §25503.5(a)] • Amounts of radioactive materials requiring an emergency plan under Parts 30, 40, or 70 of Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) or applicable quantities specified in items 1, 2, or 3, above, whichever amount is smaller. [HSC §25503.5(a)] • Applicable federal threshold planning quantities for extremely hazardous substances listed in 40 CFR Part 355, Appendix A. Note: Retail (Consumer) Products packaged for direct distribution to, and use by, the general public are exempt from HMBEP requirements except where the local agency determines otherwise pursuant to HSC §25503.5(c)(1). The HMBEP must contain the following elements: • Type of business; • Description of activities; • List of hazardous materials on -site; • Business owner/operator identification; • Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement (One page per chemical); • A map of the facilities showing the location(s), floor plans and where hazardous materials are stored and used; • An emergency response/contingency plan, with an evacuation plan; • Primary and secondary emergency contact information • An employee training plan; and • Recordkeeping. Hazardous Waste Transportation There are four major transportation routes through or near the City of La Quinta commonly used for transporting hazardous waste. The Union Pacific Railroad and Interstate 10 are located approximately 6 miles north of the La Quinta Village area. The Union Pacific Railroad runs adjacent to Interstate 10. Highway 111 runs east to west approximately 2.6 miles north of the La Quinta Village. Finally, State Route 86 is located east of La Quinta, approximately 8 miles east of the La Quinta Village, and provides regional access to the Imperial Valley. Hazardous waste cleanup on transportation routes is the responsibility of various State and federal agencies. Caltrans has created the Hazardous Waste Management program to assist local districts statewide with management and cleanup of hazardous materials encountered on roads that are under Caltrans responsibility. The California Highway Patrol (CHP) and the US Department of Transportation are responsible for regulating the shipment of hazardous waste by requiring La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.7-5 August 2016 0• ATTACH M ENT 1 5.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS appropriate labeling, packaging, and loading of hazardous materials. The CHP also requires motor carriers and drivers involved in transporting hazardous materials to obtain a hazardous materials transportation license. The United State Department of Transportation has created the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Office of Hazardous Materials Safety (OHMS) to ensure safe transport of hazardous materials by air, rail, highway and water. Existing Public and Private Airports The City of La Quinta is located near two airports: the Bermuda Dunes Airport and the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport. The Bermuda Dunes Airport is a small privately owned airport located about 5.5 miles north of the Village Build -out Plan project area, just south of Interstate 10, and west of Jefferson Street in the Bermuda Dunes community. The Bermuda Dunes Airport has one east - west runway measuring approximately 5,000 feet in length. The Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport is a public airport located about 9 miles east of the project area, east of Harrison Street and between Airport Boulevard on the north and Avenue 60 on the south. The airport is a general aviation airport and handles approximately 209 flights a day. There are two runways, including Runway 17-35, which is an 8,500 foot north -south runway, and Runway 12-30, which is a smaller 4,995-foot northwest -southeast runway. The majority of flights are from single engine aircraft, and there are no commercial flights at the airport. Fire Hazards Fire hazards exist where wildland areas are adjacent to, or are intermixed with urbanized areas. Many of these wildland areas include rugged topography with highly flammable vegetation. La Quinta is situated at the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains. However, these areas are considered low wildfire zones. The open space and wilderness areas on the western portion of the City are made up primarily of Granitic rock and sparse desert vegetation. Therefore, there is limited vegetation to burn that could cause a major wildfire. The flat urbanized areas of La Quinta, including the La Quinta Village, are considered very low wildfire risk areas. 5.7.3 Applicable Goals and Policies (;nnl HA7-1 Protection of residents from the potential impacts of hazardous and toxic materials. Policy HAZ-1.1 The storage, transport, use and disposal of hazardous materials shall comply with all City, County, State and federal standards. Program HAZ-1.1.b: Development plans for projects which may store, use or transport hazardous materials shall continue to be routed to the Fire Department and the Department of Environmental Health for review. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.7-6 August 2016 810 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Policy HAZ-1.2 To the extent empowered, the City shall regulate the generation, delivery, use and storage of hazardous materials. Program HAZ-1.2a: All facilities which produce, utilize, store or transport hazardous materials shall be constructed in strict conformance with all applicable Building and Fire Codes. Policy HAZ-1.3 Support Household Hazardous Waste disposal. Program HAZ-1.3.a: Continue to work with the County to assure regular household hazardous waste disposal events are held in and around the City. Program HAZ-1.3.b: Educate the City's residents on the proper disposal of household hazardous waste through the City's newsletter and by providing educational materials at City Hall. 5.7.4 Project Impact Analysis Development and redevelopment associated with the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan will potentially increase impacts from hazards and hazardous materials due to an increase in urban activity. This section will analyze possible impacts associated with the increase in density of commercial and residential land uses in a mixed -use environment, as proposed in the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan. Thresholds of Significance The following standards and criteria for establishing the significance of potential impacts on hazards and hazardous materials were derived from the CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G. Development and redevelopment in the Village Build -out Plan project area would have a significant effect from hazards or hazardous materials if it is determined the plan will: a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.7-7 August 2016 811 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands. a-b. Significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials; create a significant hazard to the public Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will facilitate new growth and development throughout the project area. Commercial, residential, and mixed -use development will result in an increased population of residents and non-residents that could be susceptible to hazards and hazardous materials. The amount of hazardous materials utilized by new residents within the project area will be typical of what is found within existing homes, and thus will pose minimal danger in the event of a spill or accidental release, and is not expected to create any significant hazards. Household hazardous waste can be disposed of properly through Household Hazardous Waste disposal events, or at a network of "ABOP" facilities operated by the Riverside County Department of Waste Resources. An ABOP — or Antifreeze, Batteries, Oil, Paint — facility is located in Palm Springs and is open regularly to accept these materials, as well as electronic waste. Household Hazardous Waste disposal events are held periodically at varying locations throughout the County, including the City of La Quinta. Availability of these County -hosted events not only assists in the safe disposal of household hazardous waste but also educates City residents and in turn, maintains consistency with General Plan Goal HAZ-1.3, Policy HAZ-1.3, Program HAZ-1.3a and Program HAZ- 1.3b. Commercial development and redevelopment within the project area will include businesses and development projects that use, store, and/or transport hazardous materials. As such, the Village Build -out Plan will have the potential to increase the number of people susceptible to hazards and hazardous materials. The most common commercial uses to use hazardous materials in the City are service stations, which not only use and store fuels and oils, but also operate underground storage tanks, which have the potential to contaminate soils and water supplies if not properly maintained. Other commercial users include dry cleaning operations, pool cleaning or supply stores, and automotive supply stores. Commercial users are responsible for meeting the requirements of the County Department of Environmental Health (DEH). These requirements include the proper La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.7-8 August 2016 812 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS disposal of hazardous materials through a number of licensed contractors specializing in these materials. In the event of a spill or leak of hazardous materials, initial response would be made by the closest fire engine company, followed by response from a dedicated Hazardous Material Response Team (HMRT). The Riverside County Fire Department operates a HMRT, which operates throughout the County and responds to incidents when necessary and thus helps maintain consistency with General Plan Goal HAZ-1 in regard to protecting residents from hazardous and toxic materials. Commercial, industrial and municipal generators of hazardous materials are regulated by federal, State, and local agencies regarding the proper use, disposal and cleanup of hazardous materials. The County DEH is responsible for managing a list of all hazardous waste generators in the County. With implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, new hazardous waste generators, if located in the project area, will be required to abide by County (DEH) policies and plans, and register on the hazardous waste generator list. Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan All new and existing facilities within the Village Build -out Plan project area that meet the storage quantity of hazardous materials described in the environmental setting, regarding the Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan, will be required to prepare a HMBEP to be routed to County DEH, the Fire Department, and the City's Building Department for review. Once approved, the HMBEP will be kept on file with the City of La Quinta and County of Riverside and thus will maintain consistency with General Plan Policy HAZ-1.1 and Program HAZ-1.2a. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-2, compliance with requirements for the preparation of a HMBEP will result in less than significant impacts for applicable commercial development. Spill Prevention Counter -measurement Contingency Plan As a general requirement by the City and the Riverside County Fire Department, any future or existing commercial business or facility within the Village Build -out Plan project area that proposes the use of hazardous materials will be required to prepare a Spill Prevention Counter -measurement Contingency (SPCC) Plan that addresses appropriate protocol measures to contain accidental spills of hazardous materials. A SPCC spill kit will also be required to be placed onsite at the business or facility. By requiring an SPCC Plan for all development projects, the project will maintain consistency with General Plan Policy HAZ-1.1. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 through HAZ-3 in compliance with federal, State, local regulations and programs available to address the safe handling of hazardous materials, impacts from implementation of Village Build -out Plan will be reduced to less than significant levels. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.7-9 August 2016 813 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Transport of Hazardous Material As previously discussed, the City of La Quinta is located near a network of roads, highways, and rail lines within the Coachella Valley that carry hazardous materials on a daily basis. New growth and development facilitated by the Village Build -out Plan will not increase residential population around these routes due to the fact that the project area is approximately 2.6 miles south of Highway 111, the closest hazardous materials transport route. Therefore, any accidents or spills along the designated transport routes are not expected to affect residents within the La Quinta Village. Furthermore, hazardous materials are highly regulated by various government agencies, such as Caltrans, the California Highway Patrol, and the US Department of Transportation, and cleanup and containment of these accidents is monitored by these same agencies. Emergency evacuation and response plans are developed in La Quinta to provide automated notification to residents during an emergency, including hazardous waste spills and thus would maintain consistency with Goal HAZ-1 in protecting residents from hazardous and toxic materials. Cleanup of hazardous materials, and emergency evacuation response plans as discussed above, are already in place with the City of La Quinta. As such, significant hazards to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials as a result of implementation of the Village Build -out Plan are expected to be less than significant. Hazardous Material Use and Disposal Household Hazardous Waste The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan calls for 1,230 additional residential units in the Village. These new residential units have the potential to use and store household cleaning supplies, chemicals, batteries, fluorescent bulbs, and other potentially hazardous materials. The amount of hazardous materials used by these new residential uses will be typical of what is found within existing neighborhoods throughout the region. The relatively small amount of hazardous materials and chemicals found in households may pose a minimal danger to the household during a spill or accidental release; however, these household spills and accidents are not expected to create significant hazards. Hazardous waste centers throughout the Coachella Valley, including the Burrtec Waste and Recycling Center in Palm Desert, and the Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) facility in Palm Springs, are available for residents to dispose of household hazardous waste and therefore will maintain consistency with General Plan Policy HAZ-1.3 and impacts will be less than significant. Non-residential Hazardous Materials The Village Build -out Plan also calls for new commercial and professional office uses that will potentially use, store, and transport hazardous materials. The Village Build -out Plan includes approximately 799,786 square feet of additional non-residential uses in the Village. All commercial, La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.7-10 August 2016 814 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS industrial and municipal generators of hazardous materials are regulated by federal, State, and local agencies regarding the proper use, disposal and cleanup of hazardous materials. Riverside County DEH is responsible for managing a list of all hazardous waste generators in the County. New or existing non-residential businesses or facilities that qualify as hazardous waste generators in the project area will be required to abide by County DEH policies, and register on the hazardous waste generator list. This list provides residents and public officials information as to where hazardous materials are located throughout La Quinta. With continued implementation of federal, State and local regulations and programs, the Village Build -out Plan will maintain consistency with General Plan Policy HAZ-1.1 and Program HAZ-1.1b and impacts will be less than significant. C. Hazardous, Materials, Substances, or Waste near Schools Benjamin Franklin Elementary School is located within the project area at the northeast corner of Calle Tampico and Eisenhower Drive. John Adams Elementary School is located just outside of the project area on the northeast corner of Desert Club Drive and Springtime Way. John Adams Elementary School, will be closing in the summer of 2016 and will no longer operate as a school. However the school district has discussed the possibility that this school could be used as a preschool in the future. Regulatory plans, measures and facilities are included in the school district's adopted protocol for handling onsite hazardous materials and in compliance with County of Riverside CUPA. Furthermore, existing and future adjacent land use development and redevelopment within the Village Build -out Plan project area will also be required to follow similar protocol as adopted by the City. Therefore, with the implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-4 and compliance with federal, State and local regulations and programs for both the Village Build -out Plan and for Benjamin Franklin Elementary School, the project will maintain consistency with General Plan Goal HAZ-1, Policy HAZ-1.1 and Policy HAZ-1.1b and impacts will be less than significant. d. Hazardous Materials Sites No property within the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area is identified on the "Cortese" list of hazardous materials sites as compiled and pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and managed by CalEPA (http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ accessed March 28, 2016). The closest listed site is the Foster -Gardner facility in Coachella, located south of Avenue 50 between Highway 86 and Highway 111.Hazardous materials at this site are associated with the airport facilities, as well as historic Army and Navy uses. New development and redevelopment within the project area will not be located on existing hazardous materials sites. Therefore, hazardous material site impacts in regard to the implementation of the Village Build -out Plan are considered less than significant. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.7-11 August 2016 815 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS e-f. Conflict with Public Airports and Private Air Strips The Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport is located approximately 8.3 miles east of the eastern boundary of the project area. The County of Riverside has prepared the Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, which provides policies for Airport Influence Areas for all airports in the County. The project area is not located within any zones contained in the Airport Land Use Commission Compatibility Plan. Therefore, with implementation of the Village Build -out Plan, there will be no impacts associated with Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport. The Bermuda Dunes Airport is a private airfield located approximately 5.5 miles north of the La Quinta Village, along the south side of Interstate 10 and west of Jefferson Street. The 5,000-foot runway is oriented in an east- west direction, and approaches and takeoff patterns generally do not affect any portion of the City. According to the Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, the La Quinta Village is not located within the zones affecting the airport. Therefore, implementation of the Build -out Plan would have no impact. g. Conflict with Emergency Response and Evacuation Plans The City currently contracts with the Riverside County Fire Department for emergency services, and the City's Emergency Services Division is responsible for preparing the community for natural and man-made disasters and emergencies. The Village Build -out Plan will facilitate new development, and therefore will contribute to an increase in population and in turn, will have the potential to affect emergency response plans and emergency evacuation plans. To maintain consistency with General Plan GOAL HAZ-1, the City prepared the Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) to prepare for emergencies, and has instituted the Code RED notification system to help notify the public, through telephone calls, about emergencies such as water contamination, evacuation notices, wildfires, bomb threats, hazardous spills, and other emergency situations. The City is also involved in the Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) program. New residents of La Quinta, as a result of new development brought on by implementation of the Village Build -out Plan, may allow for more volunteers for groups such as CERT. Emergency accessibility for fire and medical emergency response services will be crucial for all new and proposed redeveloped projects within the project area. Appropriate means of accessibility and emergency evacuation routing will have to be demonstrated in the project plans to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Therefore, with the City's commitment to EOP and CERT protocol in the project area and implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-5, impacts in regard to adopted emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans will be reduced to less than significant levels. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.7-12 August 2016 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS h. Wildland Fires The La Quinta Village is situated along the southwestern edge of the Coachella Valley, and approximately 0.8 miles northeast of the base of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains. Much of the southwestern portion of the City, such as the Cove, is located near the urban-wildland interface. The wilderness areas that surround La Quinta, as well as other areas along the base of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto mountain ranges are made up of granitic rock and sparse desert vegetation. The sparse desert vegetation along these mountainsides does not provide the explosive fuels needed for wildfires. Therefore, development of the Build -out Plan would have no impact with regard to wildland fires. 5.7.5 Cumulative Impacts New development within the Village does not have the potential to create cumulative impacts associated with hazards and hazardous materials, hazards to the public from routine transport, use, or disposal, and in regard to conflict with emergency response and evacuation plans. Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 through HAZ-5 will assure that all new development complies with local, state, and federal regulations, comply with California Health & Safety Code (HSC) and Title 19, Division 2, of the California Code of Regulations by preparing a Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan (HMBEP), the preparation of a Spill Prevention Counter Measurement Contingency Plan (SPCC) and for required plan review and conditioning by the Fire Department. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 through HAZ-5 and with adherence to goals, policies and programs as identified in this Section, all new development within the Village Build -out Plan will ensure that cumulative impacts would be less than significant. 5.7.6 Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 All new development projects that propose the use, transport or storage of hazardous materials in their plan of operations and are defined as a new generator of hazardous materials shall comply with all local, state, and federal regulations, as required by law. HAZ-2 In compliance with Chapter 6.95 of the California Health & Safety Code (HSC) and Title 19, Division 2, of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), all new development that proposes the storage and use of hazardous materials at or above reporting criteria thresholds shall prepare a Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan (HMBEP). The HMBEP shall be reviewed and approved by the County of Riverside CUPA and the Department of Environmental Health prior to the initiation of operation of the business. HAZ-3 All new development projects that propose the use and storage of hazardous materials will be required to prepare a Spill Prevention Counter Measurement Contingency Plan La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.7-13 August 2016 817 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (SPCC) that addresses appropriate protocol measures to contain accidental spills of hazardous materials. A SPCC spill kit shall also be placed onsite at the business or facility. HAZ-4 All new development and redevelopment projects within the Village Build -out Plan project area shall submit development plans and permits to the City for review, and City shall coordinate with the Desert Sands Unified School District regarding any proposed land uses that will produce hazardous waste, such as doctor's offices. HAZ-5 All project development proposals shall submit plans to the Fire Department for review and conditioning for safe accessibility of fire and ambulatory services and for appropriate evacuation routing of the project development in the event of an emergency. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting A. Development plans and permits for uses that use, transport, and/or store hazardous materials shall be submitted, reviewed, and regulated by proper agencies. Responsible Parties: Riverside County Fire Department, Riverside County Department of Environmental Health, City of La Quinta, California Certified Unified Program Agencies, CHP, and Caltrans. 5.7.7 Level of Significance after Mitigation With implementation of mitigation herein, impacts associated with hazards and hazardous materials will be reduced to less than significant levels. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.7-14 August 2016 818 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY 5.8 Hydrology and Water Quality 5.8.1 Introduction This section discusses the existing hydrology and water quality setting in the City of La Quinta and the project area, and identifies the potential effects from implementation of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan. Hydrological conditions in the project area have been analyzed in the City of La Quinta Focused Area Drainage Study prepared by Michael Baker International February 2016 (Appendix E), the Downtown Area Drainage Study prepared by Psomas, January 2008)(Appendix F), Coachella Valley Water District Urban Water Management Plan, July 2011, and the La Quinta Village Hydrology Study in Support of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan (Appendix G), prepared by The Altum Group, July 2016, and are summarized herein. References used to prepare this section are included in Chapter 9, References. 5.8.2 Existing Conditions Hydrology is associated with the management of floodwaters and surface runoff, which are significantly influenced by the geography and climate of a particular locale. The local microclimate also affects the amount and intensity of precipitation and therefore plays an important role in local hydrology. The Coachella Valley, including the Village Build -out Plan project area, are situated at the western end of a tectonic depression, known as the Salton Trough, which extends from Baja California to the Salton Sea at the eastern end of the Coachella Valley. Within the City-wide area, the Valley floor encompasses a broad, gently sloping basin. This basin forms where canyons of the Santa Rosa Mountains emerge onto alluvial fans, the Whitewater River floodplain, and sediments of prehistoric lakes. The foothills of the Santa Rosa Mountains rise in and adjacent to the western and southern portions of the City. Most development, including that along the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains in the western portion of the City, occurs on the Valley floor. The City, including the project area, generally enjoys a temperate climate characterized by mild winters and warm, dry summers. However, regional conditions are influenced by proximity to the San Bernardino, San Jacinto, and Santa Rosa Mountain ranges and associated climatic zones. Flooding can occur as a result of rapid melting of mountain snowpack. Occasional intense thunderstorms can also cause flooding. Storms occur most frequently during the winter months, between November and April, although the area also experiences monsoon storms during the summer and early fall (July through September). While generally of short duration, these storms may generate several inches of rainfall in a short period of time to localized areas, causing flooding. Rainfall in the region varies widely. In the surrounding mountains, average rainfall is approximately 25 inches annually, whereas on the Valley floor, including the project area, it averages 3 inches. Even in the absence of rain in the Valley itself, flooding can occur when runoff and associated mud La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.8-1 August 2016 819 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY and debris flows from mountain slopes. When precipitation occurs rapidly, dry soils quickly become saturated and cannot sufficiently percolate the increased runoff. Hydrological Conditions and Flood Hazards Floodplains are meant to carry excess waters during flooding, which is a recurring, natural event. Flooding becomes a hazard when human uses encroach into floodplains. This encroachment occurs frequently since floodplains are optimal for agriculture, access to water supplies and transportation routes. Flooding is among the most destructive and costly of all natural disasters on a global level and causes more deaths per year than any other geologic hazard. Dollar -based economic losses as a result of ever-expanding development on floodplains has steadily increased over the last several decades. It is difficult to predict rainfall in the region, since it varies widely from year to year. A review of annual rainfall totals and peak streamflow gauges on the Whitewater River demonstrates this inconsistency. Although in most years, stream discharges have remained at or near zero cubic feet per second (cfs), by contrast, peak flows exceeded 10,000 cfs on November 22, 1965 and January 25, 1969. There is a potential for substantial damage when floodwaters reach such high velocities. In the City of La Quinta, flooding primarily occurs under two scenarios: 1) flash flooding along natural or man-made channels and 2) sheet flooding across the Valley floor. Brief but powerful storms can cause high peak volumes and velocities, which are often intensified by local conditions, including both the built environment, and naturally occurring landforms and geology. In La Quinta, mountain slopes comprised of impervious rock impede percolation. Water quickly collects and flows into channels on the Valley floor, often transporting with it large amounts of mud, sand, rock fragments and other debris. Flows may exceed the existing natural or man-made channel capacities, or channels are impacted by debris or structures. Water overflows channel banks, creating the condition known as sheet flow or sheet flooding. Increasing urban development in the project area would result in an increase in impervious surfaces such as buildings, sidewalks, parking lots, and roadways that reduce the area available for natural percolation. Downstream areas are then subject to water that formerly would have been absorbed. Unless new development provides storm drain systems to carry increased flows, downstream flooding risks may increase. In the City of La Quinta, these risks are especially prevalent for development downstream of canyons and the base of mountains, such as in the vicinity of the project area since surrounding mountain slopes generally receive greater levels of rainfall. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-2 August 2016 820 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Major Regional and Local Flood Control Facilities Major flood control in the City are described herein and mapped on Exhibit 5.8-1, FEMA Flood Zones and Flood Control Facilities. Exhibit 5-8.2, FEMA Flood Zones, shows the location of the project area within the larger Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). Whitewater River/Coachella Valley Storm water Channel The Whitewater River, which is called the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel in the City of La Quinta, is the principal drainage course in the City, extending through the Coachella Valley for 50± miles. The channel is generally dry but may be inundated during storm events. In most locations it is unlined and portions are protected by unreinforced sand levees. Although the channel generally follows the recent historical natural river path, it deviates from this course where it passes through the northeast portion of the City between Jefferson Street and Miles Avenue. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has indicated the potential for breakout of the levee system along this reach of the river in the event of a 100-year storm. The levee is approximately 3.5 miles northeast of the Build -out Plan project area, so failure of the levee would not impact the Village Build -out project area. Runoff from the Santa Rosa Mountains to the west/southwest flows into the Upper Bear Creek System, which is located along the southerly and westerly margins of the Cove. The system includes the Upper Bear Creek Training Dike, Upper Bear Creek Detention Basin, Bear Creek, as well as Bear Creek channel and four associated side inlet channels and a downstream drop structure. The dike diverts runoff from a 1.7 square mile drainage area, then directs it along Bear Creek to the detention basin, which has a storage capacity of 752 acre-feet. The approximately 2.5 miles long, soil -cement lined trapezoidal Bear Creek Channel receives outflows from the Basin. The channel has a 100-year flood flow capacity, with four inlet channels on the western side that drain smaller canyons. From the channel, flows continue into the Oleander Reservoir downstream at the La Quinta Resort west of the project area thence into the La Quinta Evacuation Channel, and ultimately discharge into the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. Oleander Reservoir The Oleander Reservoir detention basin is located adjacent to the northwest corner of the project area in the La Quinta Resort and Club Mountain golf course. It collects runoff from the Bear Creek system as well as flows from drainage areas north and west of it. Flows then discharge into the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. In the event of a 100-year storm, the elevation of the reservoir is projected to be 44 feet. La Quinta Resort Channel La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-3 August 2016 821 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY The La Quinta Resort Channel is a man-made channel generally located along the western boundary of the City northwest of the Cove. Runoff from mountains west of this area is collected along this Channel and conveyed to the Oleander Reservoir. East La Quinta System The East La Quinta System is located along the southeastern edge of the Cove area, comprised of the riprap lined, trapezoidal East La Quinta Channel and several detention basins. It collects drainage from hills east and south of Calle Bermudas as well as outflows from the Calle Tecolate Detention Basin located at the southwestern point of the Cove. The system channels flow to the Avenida Bermudas Detention Basin, which manages runoff and debris from surrounding drainage areas via a 60-inch reinforced concrete buried storm drain with 100-year stormwater flow capacity. Flows from the basin are conveyed to the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-4 August 2016 822 ATTACH M ENT 1 NOTES: The map a iroended for P-1 land use pi—IrIg only. Inflow anon on IN, map Is m,Wins In ursr.s a urhttntnn 4r end aad gar*or iN iVhrm di,*,htwi Mtat, m hwt n cxldy Ihn mahuliin rdquiomnras N h In gankigc Mrard rseularkad. I Frnh Conuihanls lNenmfdrul(fCp maaesmrefreemutamnwartan6es regsrA�ng��—" nth xrurary t{ ntrt dy.i tnm wl:ch there rtupi vmrc dnlsd. FO ,hall nu k,� luhsr under any clrcurmtances for airy throe% IrldlrwL WxLal, tmkkmlal, a ca ,IwNai ' d-.M with moped to any claim by any ucr or third parry on accown at, or are," tom. the used the map. S:r k72�reka — Xlevee . Deep Canyon Stormwater C ne Coachella Valley X Stormwater Charnel Quinta Resort Chan Oleander Re Bear Creek Channel lev• r __ tl J) A, \ / �.. Upper Bear Creek i .��,,•J /`�. :t Detention Basin A L Bear Creek Training Dike 4 , Source: La C El 15 The Altum Group Whitewater River tf Quinta Evacuation Project Channel scrvgir fir! Site 11�. AO � —Avenida Bermudas Detention Basin East La Quinta Channel Calle Tecate Detention Basin Lake Cahuilla Dike No. 2/ .x �, x—. yD u Devll Capyon Guadalupe Dike 1 !� v e inta General Plan 2035 EIR, Figure III-10 'rami . Dike D Canal e No 4 --- X\\\ X X— \ %u A _ t % FEMA Flood Zones and C Flood Control Facilities Explanation High Risk Areas, ® Zaie Ilia) corresponds to the 100,^w Rtod areas, » determined by appro unate methods. Because detailed hydraulic analyses were not performed, no base Rood elevations or depths are shown. Mandatory Rood Insurance Is roquired. —1 Zane that corresponds to 100 year shallow Rood areas where average depds arc b Kweert 1 and 3 ket (usually from sheet now oo sloping tenaln).• Mandatory Rood insurance is required. Moderate and Low Risk Area ®Zone that rnresludus m areas of m-y i r Rood: arau of 100.year flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile, and areas protected by levees from 100-year Rood. No base flood ckvatiorts or deFdn are shmvn. Flood insurance is available but not required. Zone tut conespords to areas outside olthe SMyear Rood No base flood elevations ordepths are stun.. I" I—. is available bud not required. Undetermined Risk Area r" Zone that corresponds to unstudied areas where gad Wards are undetermined, but flooding is pdnsible. I laud —came b avahlabk but not required L1flae LaQuinta City Boundary --- I — River or stream / to Quinta Sphere of influence • For ekvadcm or depths see original FFMA Flo d Issuance Rate Mafn avaitable as the City, County, or vvww.fema.gm. N Scale: 1:84,000 7000 0 7000 w -7rE Feet 2 0 2 S Kilometers a,. Atgx USGS Topographic ALP from S—A.VLAPS RASTER 1997 5.r 7 Federal Fattapntcy MaMp—ni Agency, San Bemadino, Ebod I—. Bale Mal,(P-4 rat dxm- 0606SC2229G,06065024 1 G. 0606SC1243G. 0606SC7211 G, 06065C2232G, 065 06C'2233G 060650234Q 06065C 2237G06SC2 06239G. 060650244C. 06065C2261G, 0606SC29000 _� Earth Consultants Intemat&d Project Number. 3004 Date: 2010 FEMA Flood Hazard Zones and Flood Control Facilities La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 5-8.1 23 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-6 August 2016 824 ATTACH M ENT 1 Legend La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Project Arec Flood Zone Zone X - Areas of 500-year Flood Zone A - Areas of 100-year Flood - No Base Flood Elevations Zone AO - Areas of 100-year Flood - Average Depths of 1-3 Feet L Zone X - Areas outside 500-year Flood Zone X -Areas Protected by Levees from 100-year Flood 1 inch = 500 feet The Altum Group FEMA Flood Zones La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Project Description N W + E S Source: FEMA FIRM Panel 06065C2241G, 2008 Exhibit 5.8-2 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-8 August 2016 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY La Quinta Evacuation Channel The La Quinta Evacuation Channel flows northeasterly from the Bear Creek Channel, approximately 3.5 miles through developed areas of the City to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. This channel is designed to capture and carry stormwater from various flood control systems in the City. There are two reaches, of which the lower is approximately 2.4 miles long within a 50-foot wide trapezoidal earthen channel. The upper reach is a grass -lined, irregularly shaped channel approximately 1.1 miles long. La Quinta North Diversion Channel This facility is described in the City Master Drainage Plan as conveying "the Standard Project Flood (SPF) from off -site mountain areas northwest of the City southerly to the Oleander Reservoir." Lake Cahuilla Lake Cahuilla, while not a flood control facility, constitutes a major regional facility managed by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) and is therefore considered herein as part of the evaluation of flooding hazards. Lake Cahuilla was constructed in 1969 as a reserve storage facility for irrigation water. The lake is located on approximately 135 acres at the base of the foothills of the Santa Rosa Mountains, between avenues 56 and 58, west of Jefferson Street. It is the termination of the Coachella Branch of the All -American irrigation canal. The Lake Cahuilla County Park, operated by Riverside County Parks and Open Space District, is located at the same site on lands leased by CVWD to the Parks District. Lake Cahuilla has a capacity of approximately 1,500 acre-feet of water at depths of 11 to 12 feet, protected by a levee system approximately 25 feet high and 100 feet wide. It is cement lined and sealed with a six-inch layer of soil cement. Lake Cahuilla contains more than 50-acre feet of storage capacity. Local Structures Within the City of La Quinta there are a variety of local structures, including storm drains, culverts and catch basins located within private development and area streets. These facilities collect and retain stormwater and irrigation runoff, and in some cases, detain flows for eventual evaporation or infiltration. Dikes As shown in Exhibit 5.8-1, there are several dikes located near the base of mountains which have been constructed to protect developed areas on the Valley floor from runoff from mountain slopes. In addition to the Bear Creek Training Dike, previously discussed, these include three dikes constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation: the Eastside Dike, which was constructed to protect the Coachella Branch of the All -American Canal; and Dike 2 and Dike 4, which were constructed to protect Lake Cahuilla as well as lands between Avenue 58 and Avenue 66. Dike 2 and Dike 4 total 5.2 miles, and are located south and southeast of Lake Cahuilla, respectively. Dike 4 La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-9 August 2016 827 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY encompasses the Guadalupe Dike and Guadalupe Training Dike. Dike 4 is accredited by FEMA; Dike 2 is not yet accredited. CVWD has constructed approximately 165 acres of groundwater recharge basins within the Dike 4 impound area. These basins comprise an important component of groundwater replenishment programs discussed in CVWD's Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) for recharge of the groundwater basin in the eastern Coachella Valley. La Quinta Village Drainage Patterns Traditionally, the Village has been developed without requiring on -site storm drain retention due to the commercial nature of the area. What this means is that commercial sites are usually entirely covered impervious surfaces (buildings and parking lots) with the exception of small landscaped areas. Therefore, commercial sites are graded so that water does not pond and stormwater runs off into the public right-of-way where it is carried downstream to a basin. In the case of the project area, this is the Oleander Basin (shown on Exhibit 5.8-1 northwest of the project area). The Altum Group's hydrology study prepared for the Build —out Plan, revisited this approach and compared potential impacts due to future build -out of the Village area based on the 10-year storm event. The study area included 90 acres of the larger 137-acre Build -out Plan project area generally west of Eisenhower Drive, east of Desert Club Drive, south of Calle Tampico and north of Calle Sinaloa (Avenue 52). Exhibit 5.8-3, 10-Year On -site Retention Study, shows the hydrology study area. The remaining areas east of Desert Club Drive and north of Calle Tampico drain in different directions and do not affect the study area. Of the 90 acres in the study area, approximately 77 acres are currently developed and 13 acres are vacant. As the hydrology study is in support of the future commercial build -out of Village, the analysis was limited to the increase in runoff volume due to the development of the vacant parcels. Regulatory Setting Federal Clean Water Act The Clean Water Act (CWA) was enacted in 1972, and was intended to set goals for restoring and maintaining water quality through reduction of point source pollution by industry and sewage treatment facilities. Waterbodies containing "waters of the U.S." fall under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which administers Section 404 of the CWA for these waters. In the City of La Quinta, development projects proposing construction activities within the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel are subject to compliance with Section 404 regulations and may be required to obtain a 404 permit. Such projects may also be subject to compliance with Section 401 of the CWA, which is administered by the RWQCB Colorado River Basin Region. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-10 August 2016 828 ATTACH M ENT 1 w 1. w LEGEND — - � CO . . . . . . C9MMERCiALCc nO'rELOGf'0 W G - - . - - . - - - . . COMMERCIAL UNDEVELOPED K 10 YEAH STOF1lti1 FtETENTK)N VOLUME SUWEA AREA `gac.} VOI,A116E {CU-FFJ BASIN AREA (AT 4' DEEP) 11 0.61 1,530 1,J70 S.F. _ STUDY AREA = 2 D.54 1,410 1._W S.F- ` 3 0.65 1,685 1,450 S.F. CALL.E TAM 4 0.93 z,425 854 S.F. 5 0.58 1 510 1.355 S.F. �[} � 0.3fl 1,310 1,353 S.F. CD D _ 4.1 8,445 S.F. 2.1131 S.F../.ACRE cu Cu CAI Cu Q c� !Cu LA QUINTA COr�MUNrry FITNESS CENTER JI� •C O 7 +`r J © Cu � U cu oFA � o I - — — c' AVENUE 52 CD Cpcu p i Cu ------------- p� F 1 r 1 1 ® m m s` CrrY OF LA rUINTALA OUNTA YLLAGE HYDROLOGY SNEET .S�r�� •Emlrwaia�Ha� Ilre Ahumlinuy 10 YEAR OWSRE RETENTKM Eni"y 73.714P ;WmtOX1�. SuIk214. Po1m Pawn CAS OF LM34G47d 7heAIWT.0 ups I.7 QQd1 1 3 Source: The Altum Group, 2016 E115 The Altum Group Ten -Year On -Site Retention Study Map La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 5.8-3 29 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-12 August 2016 830 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) In 1987 the CWA was amended to require states to reduce runoff into waterways. These requirements are implemented by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. NPDES mandates the adoption of stormwater management plans and programs to reduce runoff of pollutants in storm water systems into waters of the United States. In addition, individual project proponents are required to prepare and implement Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) for the control of runoff during construction. Regional Water Quality Control Board The Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin (RWQCB) implements the NPDES on a statewide basis. RWQCB issues NPDES permits to local jurisdictions, which are held as joint permits among multiple jurisdictions in some regions, including Riverside County. The NPDES program in which La Quinta participates also includes Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, CVWD, Riverside County, and all Riverside County cities except for Blythe. National Flood Insurance Program As mandated by the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, FEMA administers the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) to provide subsidized federal flood insurance to residents of communities where future floodplain development is regulated. FEMA has developed Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS) for many areas in the United States so as to determine the need for and availability of federal flood insurance. FIRMS assist the federal government in establishing appropriate flood insurance premiums as well as determining elevations and flood proofing measures. The National Flood Insurance Reform Act (1994) established grant programs for flood mitigation to states and local communities. The Community Rating System (CRS) was instituted through the 1994 legislation, and implements a system by which communities that manage and protect natural floodplain functions and erosion hazards are credited. The City of La Quinta has held NFIP membership since 1985. The most recent La Quinta FIRM maps were updated in 2008 and include 12 community panels. Riverside County has participated in the NFIP since 1980. Property owners in the City are therefore eligible for flood insurance, and must purchase insurance prior to obtaining financing to buy, build or improve structures in a Special Flood Hazard Zone based on FEMA mapping. FIRM maps include a variety of flood risk information based on historic, meteorological, hydrologic and hydraulic data, as well as existing development, open space and topographic conditions within an area. They also incorporate the results of engineering studies conducted by FEMA, which establish the "base flood" (100-year flood). Areas subject to the 100-year flood are considered at high risk of inundation. FEMA uses these data to delineate Special Flood Hazards Zones. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-13 August 2016 831 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY FIRM maps are subject to updates as local conditions, including development, hydrologic conditions, populations, and other variables may change frequently. All areas of flooding are not necessarily identified on these maps. FEMA has instituted a Map Modernization Program to improve the accuracy of FIRM maps. It has set a goal of creating digital maps to delineate 65% of the continental U.S. and 92% of the population. Flood Hazard Zones in the Planning Area Flood Hazard Zone data from corresponding FIRM Community Panels (maps) for the La Quinta planning area is described below and shown on Exhibit 5.8-1, FEMA Flood Zones and Flood Control Facilities. As noted above, FIRMS for La Quinta were published in 2008. There have been two floodplain map revisions for the City approved by FEMA. As a result, all developed areas within the City's corporate limits are outside the 100-year flood zone and do not require flood insurance. Zone A: Areas of 100-year flood where no base flood elevations or depths are shown. Requires flood insurance. Zone AO: Areas of 100-year flood with average depths of 1 — 3 feet, generally from sheet flow on sloping terrain. Requires flood insurance. Zone X: Areas of 500-year flood with average depth of less than 1 foot or less than one square mile drainage area; and protected by levees from 100-year flood. No base flood elevations or depths are shown. Flood insurance available but not required. Zone D: Areas where flood hazards are undetermined but flooding is possible. Flood insurance available but not required. As shown on Exhibit 5.8-2, the Village Build -out Plan project area is located within Zone X Area (areas within the 500-year flood plain). Regional Stormwater Management Analysis and design of regional flood control structures is the responsibility of the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC). In the City, including the Village Build - out Plan project area, CVWD manages regional facilities, which collect runoff from areas outside the City, including surrounding mountains. Exhibit 5.8-1 above, shows the regional flood hazard zones and flood control facilities as they relate to the project area. Planning, maintenance and construction of improvements for regional facilities fall within the broad management responsibilities with which CVWD is charged. Of primary concern to CVWD are rivers, major streams and tributaries, as well as areas of substantial sheet flow. Regional facilities as described above include the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel (Whitewater River), the La Quinta Evacuation Channel, the Bear Creek System, the East La Quinta Channel and Lake Cahuilla. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-14 August 2016 832 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Existing Project Area Drainage Infrastructure Existing drainage generally consists of three drainage areas within the Village Build -out Plan. The first drainage area is located southwest of the Village and bounded by Calle Tampico to the north, Calle Sinaloa to the south, Avenida Bermudas to the east and Eisenhower Drive to the west. Current drainage in this area is directed towards Avenida Navarro and Avenida Bermudas to the north and then discharges into Calle Tampico. The second drainage area is of the Village area and bounded by Calle Tampico to the north, Avenue 52 to the south, Desert Club Drive to the east and Avenida Bermudas to the west. Drainage is directed towards Desert Club Drive, then drains towards the north and discharges into Calle Tampico. The drainage in this area is mostly sheet flow into local dry wells, sand filters and retention basins, then street flows towards Desert Club Drive. A third, but smaller drainage area located at the northwestern portion of the Village Build -out area, generally drains northward along Avenida Martinez, Avenida Mendoza and Avenida Villa to Calle Tampico. Runoff from all three drainage areas are intercepted into double reinforced catch basins (RCB) placed along the eastbound side of Calle Tampico at each cross street with the exception of Avenida Bermudas. The RCBs convey runoff to an underground 2 feet high by 6 feet wide double reinforced concrete box that drains from west to east along Calle Tampico. However, the catch basin capacity collects only 26.5 cubic feet per second (cfs) from an overall 71 cfs (10-year storm flow) generated from the off -site area. The remaining flow ponds to a depth of 7-inches, then flows towards the east and joins the 41.5 cfs runoff from the project area. The combined runoff flows east to another catch basin located along Calle Tampico east of Desert Club Drive. An existing CVWD 60-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) storm drain flows north along Desert Club Drive. This 60-inch pipe does not receive runoff from the Village Build -out Plan area, but instead conveys overflow runoff from the detention basins located south of the study area (see Exhibit 5.8- 1). The pipe drains from south to north and discharges into the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. Also, a 66-inch RCP exists along Avenue 52 south of the study area. The 66-inch RCP drains from west to east and conveys a small portion of its flow into the 60-inch RCP in Desert Club Drive via an 18-inch lateral pipe connection. Another RCB is located on the westbound side of Calle Tampico at approximately 220 feet east of the intersection with Avenida Bermudas. This RCB intercepts drainage into an 18-inch RCP to Avenida Bermudas where it then travels northward along Avenida Bermudas and increases in size to a 42-inch RCP before discharging into a retention basin drywell that if filled to capacity, discharges into the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. Local Stormwater Management The City of La Quinta prepared a Master Drainage Plan update for the City in 2009 (Psomas) that included a separate appendix (Downtown Area Drainage Study) that specifically discussed the downtown area (La Quinta Village). The Downtown Area Drainage Study focused on a portion of La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-15 August 2016 833 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY the Village Build -out Plan of approximately 25.6 acres between Calle Tampico to the north, Avenue 52 to the south, Desert Club Drive to the east and Avenida Bermudas to the west. The Psomas study estimated that a 10-year frequency storm runoff would have the potential to generate up to 41.5 cfs. The study found that insufficient storm drainage infrastructure existed along Calle Tampico and would be prone to flooding during storm -related events. Therefore, the City undertook a focused hydrology study of the project area that concentrated on the vacant parcels that could be developed under the Village Build -out Plan. Traditionally, the Village has been developed without requiring on -site storm drain retention due to the commercial nature of the area. What this means is that commercial sites are usually entirely covered impervious surfaces (buildings and parking lots) with the exception of small landscaped areas. Therefore, commercial sites are graded so that water does not pond and stormwater runs off into the public right-of-way where it is carried downstream to a basin. In the case of the project area, this is the Oleander Basin (shown on Exhibit 5.8-1 northwest of the project area). The Altum Group's hydrology study prepared for the Build —out Plan, revisited this approach and compared potential impacts due to future build -out of the Village area based on the 10-year storm event. The study area included 90 acres of the larger 137-acre Build -out Plan project area generally west of Eisenhower Drive, east of Desert Club Drive, south of Calle Tampico and north of Calle Sinaloa (Avenue 52). Exhibit 5.8-3, 10-Year On -site Retention Study, shows the hydrology study area. The remaining areas east of Desert Club Drive and north of Calle Tampico drain in different directions and do not affect the study area. Of the 90 acres in the study area, approximately 77 acres are currently developed and 13 acres are vacant. As the hydrology study is in support of the future commercial build -out of Village, the analysis was limited to the increase in runoff volume due to the development of the vacant parcels. The results contained in La Quinta Village Hydrology Study can be separated into two sets of data to use for comparison. The data were generated by 1) analyzing the anticipated maximum storm runoff volume generated on each vacant commercial site within the study area during the 10-year storm event; and 2) calculating the increase in runoff discharge due to development of the vacant parcels within the study area. 5.8.3 Applicable Goals and Policies GOAL FH-1 Protection of the health, safety and welfare of the community from flooding and hydrological hazards. Policy FH-1.3 The City shall continue to implement development standards that provide for a reduction in runoff from developed lands and are consistent with local and regional stormwater management plans. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-16 August 2016 834 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Program FH-1.3.a: New development shall continue to be required to construct on -site retention/detention basins and other necessary stormwater management facilities that are capable of managing 100-year storm water flows. Policy FH-1.5 The City shall coordinate with CVWD to minimize the potential for the occurrence of inundation from levee or water tank failure, including seismically induced inundation. Program FH-1.5.a: The City shall annually request a status update from the Coachella Valley Water District of their monitoring of the structural safety of the levees around Lake Cahuilla and along the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel and the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. Program FH-1.5.b: The City shall annually request a status update from the Coachella Valley Water District of their monitoring of the structural integrity of above -ground water tanks and reservoirs, and where needed, the implementation of bracing techniques to minimize potential structural damage and/or failure. 5.8.4 Project Impact Analysis Thresholds of Significance The thresholds are derived from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, and are used to determine the level of potential effect. Implementation of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan would have a significant effect on hydrology if it is determined that the project will: a. Violate any water quality standards or wastewater discharge requirements. b. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on - or off -site. c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off -site. d. Create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. e. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazards Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map. f. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flow. g. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of a levee or dam. h. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-17 August 2016 835 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY a. Violate any water quality standards or wastewater discharge requirements Construction activities within the Village Build -out Plan project area could expose soils to erosion from rainfall, runoff, and wind. Wind erosion could result in the generation of fugitive dust, which is addressed in Section 5.2, Air Quality. Erosion from rainfall and runoff is more problematic because pollutants from heavy equipment or construction related materials, such as diesel, gasoline, oils, grease, solvents, lubricants, or other petroleum products could mix with the water and run offsite. The CRWQCB has adopted strict regulations for the control and release of stormwater into the Whitewater Storm Channel. Therefore, all project applicants who disturb one acre or more must prepare a SWPPP to be implemented throughout the project construction period. Each SWPPP must list and prescribe appropriate best management practices (BMPs) for the control and treatment of runoff from the project site. A copy of the SWPPP prepared by a Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) and implemented by a Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP) must be maintained and updated for each project site and available for review during the entirety of the construction period. During long term operation, each project will be required to maintain the site under a post construction Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to be prepared by a QSD that addresses all potential runoff and ongoing maintenance of BMPs related to project retention basins, catch basin inserts, flood channels, flood walls, levees, berms, drop structures and underground culverts. Each project specific WQMP will be required to comply with California Drainage Law in accordance with the CRWQCB to assure that the discharge of stormwater flow from future projects is handled in a manner that is reasonably compatible with pre -development conditions. With implementation of Mitigation Measures HWQ-1 and HWQ-2, all projects within the Village Build -out Plan project area that disturb one acre or more will prepare and implement a SWPPP during construction and prepare and implement a WQMP for post construction at each site. This will ensure that the project's impact in regard to violating any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements will be reduced to less than significant levels with the proper operation and maintenance of structural BMPs, and continued use of non-structural BMPs such as education programs for local residents (generally undertaken by CVWD). b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge A Water Supply Study (WSS) was prepared for the La Quinta General Plan that provided estimates of existing water demands generated within the General Plan Planning Area and projected future water demands that will be generated at build out of the proposed General Plan. Development within the Village Build -out Plan project area was included in these projections, although the exact La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-18 August 2016 836 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY number of additional residences and increased square footage of non-residential uses was only projected at the time. It should be noted that the WSS prepared for the General Plan is programmatic, and qualifying individual development projects within the Planning Area may be subject to preparation of project -level Water Supply Assessments (WSA) as warranted. It is unlikely that any future projects in the project area would rise to the level requiring a WSA. For example, the threshold for residential development is 500 dwelling units. Existing Water Demands Table 5.8-1, Estimate of Existing Water Service Demands, shows the estimated water demands that are currently generated for the General Plan Planning Area including the Village Build -out Plan project area. The table shows that the existing water demands for the General Plan Planning Area are estimated to be 32,496 acre-feet per year, consisting of 31,227 acre-feet within City limits and 1,268 acre-feet within the Sphere of Influence. Existing water demands for the General Plan Planning Area are comprised of 3.9 percent within the Sphere and 96.1 percent within City limits. Water Demands at Build -Out (2035) Table 5.8-2, Estimate of Water Service Demands at Build Out, shows the projected water demand for land uses in the City, the Village Build -out Plan, the Sphere and the entire La Quinta planning area at build out, assuming that new development adheres to water efficiency building standards and existing development continues to generate business as usual water demands. Table 5.8-2 shows that the build out water demands for the General Plan Planning Area, including the Village Build -out Plan, are estimated to be 54,467 acre-feet per year, consisting of 37,783 acre- feet within City limits and 16,684 acre-feet within the Sphere of Influence. Build out water demands in the General Plan Planning Area are comprised of 30.6 percent within the Sphere and 69.3 percent within City limits. Table 5.8-1 Estimate of Existing Water Service Demands Landscaping Potable Total Demand Daily Demand Land Use Designation (ac-ft/yr) (ac-ft/yr) (ac-ft/yr) (mgd) La Quinta City Limits Low Density Residential 6,482.65 4,091.66 10,574.31 9.44 Medium/HighDensity Residential 1,157.40 521.42 1,678.83 1.5 Commercial 311.87 1,007.61 1,319.48 1.18 MaiorCommunitv Facilities 295.91 111.99 407.9 0.36 Open Space - Natural N/A N/A - - Open Space- Recreation 16,465.48 N/A 16,465.48 14.7 Streets, Sidewalks, Medians 781.47 N/A 781.47 0.7 Total 25,494.78 5,732.69 31,227.46 27.88 La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-19 August 2016 837 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Table 5.8-1 Estimate of Existing Water Service Demands (continued) Sphere of Influence Low Density Residential 857.11 157.31 1,014.42 0.91 Medium/High Density Residential 0.18 - 0.18 0 Commercial 17.71 43.03 60.74 0.05 MaiorCommunity Facilities 30.65 13.26 43.9 0.04 Streets, Sidewalks, Medians 149.17 N/A 149.17 0.13 Total 1,054.82 213.6 1,268.42 1.13 Planning Area Summary Low Density Residential 7,339.76 4,248.97 11,588.73 10.35 Medium/High Density Residential 1,157.58 521.42 1,679.01 1.5 Commercial/Industrial 329.58 1,050.64 1,380.22 1.23 MaiorCommunitv Facilities 326.56 125.25 451.81 0.4 Open Space - Natural N/A N/A - - Open Space- Recreation 16,465.48 N/A 16,465.48 14.7 Streets, Sidewalks, Medians 930.64 N/A 930.64 0.83 Total 26,549.59 5,946.28 32,495.88 29.01 Source: Table III-51, "La Quinta General Plan Water Resources Projections," Appendix A to Water Supply Study, prepared by Terra Nova Planning & Research Inc., January 2011. Proposed Development At build out development within the General Plan Planning Area is expected to consume 54,467 acre-feet of water per year, which represents an increase in water demand of approximately 21,971 acre-feet compared to water demands generated by existing development. Table 5.8-3, Estimate of Water Service Demands from New Development below shows the projected water demand that will be generated from new development set forth in the 2035 General Plan. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-20 August 2016 838 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Table 5.8-2 Estimate of Water Service Demands at Build Out Landscaping Potable TotalDaily Demand Land Use Designation Demand (ac- (ac-ft/yr) (ac-ft/yr) (mgd) La Quinta City Limits Low Density Residential 9,294.22 4,881.63 14,175.85 12.66 Medium/High Density Residential 1,502.34 1,016.81 2,519.15 2.25 Commercial 496.72 1,360.39 1,857.11 1.66 Major CommunitvFacilities 476.80 149.64 626.44 0.56 Open Space - Natural N/A N/ N/A N/A Open Space- Recreation 17,681.77 N/A 17,681.77 15.79 Streets, Sidewalks, Medians 922.39 N/A 922.39 0.82 Total 30,374.25 7,408.47 37,782.72 33.73 Sphere of Influence Low Density Residential 12,309.74 3,375.02 15,684.76 14.00 Medium/High Density Residential 24.21 34.41 58.62 0.05 Commercial 192.99 377.52 570.51 0.51 Major CommunityFacilities 32.47 13.63 46.10 0.04 Streets, Sidewalks, Medians 324.17 N/A 324.17 0.29 Total 12,883.57 3,800.58 16,684.15 14.89 Planning Area Summary Low Density Residential 21,603.95 8,256.66 29,860.61 26.66 Medium/HighDensity Residential 1,526.55 1,051.22 2,577.77 2.30 Commercial/Industrial 689.71 1,737.91 2,427.62 2.17 Major Communitv Facilities 509.27 163.27 672.54 0.60 Open Space - Natural N/A N/ - - Open Space- Recreation 17,681.77 N/A 17,681.77 15.79 Streets, Sidewalks, Medians 1,246.56 N/ 11246.56 1.11 Total 43,257.82 11,209.05 54,466.87 48.62 Source: Table III-512, "Lo Quinta General Plan Water Resources Projections," Appendix A to Water Supply Assessment prepared by Terra Nova Planning & Research Inc., January 2011 Table 5.8-3 shows that 70 percent of the new water demand will be generated by new development within the Sphere, and 30 percent will be generated by new development within City Limits. Table 5.8-3 Estimate of Water Service Demands from New Development La Quinta Landscaping (ac-ft/yr) Potable (ac-ft/yr) Total Demand (ac-ft/yr) Daily Demand (mgd) City Limits 4,879.47 1,675.78 6,555.26 5.85 Sphere of Influence 11,828.75 3,586.98 15,415.73 13.76 Planning Area Summary 1 16,708.23 1 5,262.77 1 21,970.99 1 19.61 Source: Table 111-53, Terra Nova/La Quinta General Plan EIR, July 2012. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-21 August 2016 839 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Water Demand Consistency CVWD's 2010 UWMP accounted for new growth and development that is expected to occur within the La Quinta Planning Area including the Village Build -out Plan area. The goal of the UWMP is to assure groundwater basin sustainability with elements directed towards supplemental imported water, source substitution and water conservation. As such, these elements are required to be incorporated into the design and development of each future project within the Build -out Plan. As an urban water supplier, CVWD is required to prepare an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) every five years in response to the requirements of the Urban Water Management Planning Act (UWMP Act). California Water Code Sections 10610 through 10656. Therefore. in 2015, CVWD commenced preparation of its revised UWMP, which was adopted in July of 2016. GVMAa=W4HfflPl@ffl@A%@ [a agrgl ;Agar by Section 3.3 of the General Plan WSS described that the water demand projections for the La Quinta General Plan Update *:g€ were relative to the water demand projections set forth in the 2010 CVWD UWMP. The average per capita water demand for the CVWD Service Area was approximately 482 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) for 2010 and is projected to be 423 gpcd for 2035. The 2010 per capita water demand for the La Quinta Planning Area is approximately 473 gallons per day and is projected to be 361 gpcd in 2035. The water demand estimates for the La Quinta Planning Area for 2010 and 2035 are 2 percent and 15 percent more efficient compared to the CVWD estimates. As such, water demands generated by the General Plan Planning Area, including the Village Build - out project area, are fully captured and accounted for within the 2010 and 2015 CVWD UWMP projections. Of note is that future residential uses in the Village Build -out Plan project area will be multi -family projects developed in an urban setting where traditional yards would not be likely. Landscaping represents a large percentage of water usage in traditional residential subdivisions that would occur in the 1,230 new residential units proposed in the project area. Nonetheless any new landscaping proposed for development within the Build -out Plan will be required to comply with the City's landscape Ordinance which was adopted in accordance with the State's Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and CVWD's Ordinance 1302.1 as amended. Therefore, water demand projections as proposed under the 2035 General Plan are consistent with the water demand estimates utilized by CVWD. Ground Water QualitX Groundwater from wells throughout the Coachella Valley is carefully monitored by CVWD for hazardous pollutants, most notably Chromium-6. CVWD is currently embarked upon a multi -year program involvin& the construction of new infrastructure and facilities for the treatment of La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-22 August 2016 840 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Chromium-6, which will be installed onsite at a number of existing and future domestic water wells within the Coachella Valley including wells that will serve the City of La Quinta and the Build -out Plan. The Build -out Plan's contribution of Development Impact Fees will assist in providing CVWD with the necessary funding to upgrade new infrastructure and will thereby maintain groundwater ualit . Impacts to Water Supply Resources As described, CVWD serves as the water provider for the City of La Quinta. Water supplies that serve the existing La Quinta Planning Area are derived from groundwater in storage and imported Colorado River water and State Water Project (SWP) exchange water. All urban water demands are currently met through groundwater supplies. New water demands generated by proposed development in the Village Build -out Plan project area will be met through a combination of groundwater, imported supplies, and reclaimed water. CVWD expects to have sufficient water supplies to serve development in the La Quinta Planning Area, including the Village Build -out Plan project area, through 2035 and beyond by utilizing a combination of water supply sources and treating surface water supplies to potable quality standards. CVWD projects that, in 2035, the urban water demand total of 242,700 acre-feet per year will be supplied by 53 percent groundwater, 20 percent treated Colorado River Water, 22 percent untreated Colorado River Water, and 4 percent desalinated agricultural drain water. CVWD's current UWMP provides long term water supply/demand planning in an effort to protect water resources, preserve water quality, and assure that water supplies are available to meet demands. CVWD's UWMP evaluated water demands relative to supplies for the period between 2010 and 2035 under normal, single, and multiple dry year conditions. The current UWMP finds that with groundwater supplies, imported water supplies, water conservation programs, and recharge activity water supplies are sufficient to meet demands during normal, single, and multiple dry year conditions through 2035. New development within the La Quinta Planning Area including the Village Build -out Plan project area will result in an increase in the demand for water of approximately 6,555 acre-feet within City Limits and 15,416 acre-feet within the Sphere of Influence by 2035. This new demand will be met by groundwater, imported Colorado River water, desalinated agricultural drain water, or a combination thereof. As described above, CVWD has accounted for this increased water demand in conjunction with all other projected water demands within the service area. CVWD has determined that through adoption of their 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan (see Section 5-15 Utilities) and through utilization of a combination of water supply sources including the need to provide expanded availability of tertiary treated water, and coordination by the City in implementing CVWD UWMP regulations, sufficient water supplies will therefore be available to meet demands in 2035 and also maintain consistency with Policy UTL-1.1 and Program UTL-1.1a. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-23 August 2016 841 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY As such, the level of additional water supplies needed to meet demands generated by development within the Village Build -out Plan will not substantially deplete groundwater reserves or interfere with groundwater recharge. The City of La Quinta relies on CVWD to manage and supply water resources. Nonetheless, the City is committed to promoting water conservation and achieving water savings, protecting groundwater reserves, and preserving groundwater quality. In the Village Build -out Plan, water conservation can be achieved through retrofitting of existing water -intensive appliances with the installation of water efficient appliances, implementation of water efficient landscaping plans for all new development, the use of new technology, and advanced irrigation control for outdoor landscaping. Mitigation Measures HWQ-5 through HWQ-11 will ensure that impacts in regard to water supply are reduced to less than significant levels. These measures are also repeated as UTL-4 through UTL-10 found in Section 5.15, Utilities and Service Systems. C. Substantially alter drainage patterns that could substantially increase the rate of surface runoff resulting in flooding on or off site Traditionally, the Village has been developed without requiring on -site storm drain retention due to the commercial nature of the area. What this means is that commercial sites are usually entirely covered impervious surfaces (buildings and parking lots) with the exception of small landscaped areas. Therefore, commercial sites are graded so that water does not pond and stormwater runs off into the public right-of-way where it is carried downstream to a basin. In the case of the project area, this is the Oleander Basin (shown on Exhibit 5.8-1 northwest of the project area). The Altum Group's hydrology study prepared for the Build —out Plan, revisited this approach and compared potential impacts due to future build -out of the Village area based on the 10-year storm event. The study area included 90 acres of the larger 137-acre Build -out Plan project area generally west of Eisenhower Drive, east of Desert Club Drive, south of Calle Tampico and north of Calle Sinaloa (Avenue 52). Exhibit 5.8-2, 10-Year On -site Retention Study, (previously discussed) shows the hydrology study area. The remaining areas east of Desert Club Drive and north of Calle Tampico drain in different directions and do not affect the study area. Of the 90 acres in the study area, approximately 77 acres are currently developed and 13 acres are vacant. As the hydrology study is in support of the future commercial build -out of Village, the analysis was limited to the increase in runoff volume due to the development of the vacant parcels. This is because even if the parcels are redeveloped, stormwater flows would not be expected to increase over the flows already occurring in the project area, due to their developed state. The results contained in the La Quinta Village Hydrology Study can be separated into two sets of data to use for comparison. The data are generated by 1) analyzing the anticipated maximum storm runoff volume generated on each vacant commercial site within the study area during the 10-year La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-24 August 2016 842 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY storm event; and 2) calculating the increase in runoff discharge due to development of the vacant parcels within the study area. On -site Retention Analysis Several undeveloped parcels designated for commercial use within the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area were studied separately to determine the on -site retention volume capacity that would be required in order to capture 100 percent of the 10-year event is shown in Exhibit 5.8-3, 10-Year On -site Retention Study Map. Each of the commercial parcels that were studied share similar topographic features in that they have less than minimum allowable fall in order to facilitate surface drainage. For the purposes of the analysis, it was assumed that a sufficient gradient would be provided in order to achieve positive surface flow and 90 percent impervious lot coverage would exist under the developed condition. Since the undeveloped parcels within the study area share similar characteristics, the results of the La Quinta Village Hydrology Study were tabulated and averaged to produce a representative retention basin footprint size per acre of commercial development. The resulting value would then be evaluated at the time a specific project is proposed based on its feasibility on a lot by lot basis. Build -out of the vacant commercial properties within the study area would require approximately 2,200 square feet per acre designated for retention basin use in order to capture the on -site runoff generated during the 10-year storm event. Street Capacity Analysis Vacant parcels designated for commercial development within the study area were identified and studied to determine the runoff discharge tributary to each vacant parcel under the existing vacant condition as well as the projected commercially developed condition. The results were compared for all vacant commercial parcels in order to determine the increase in runoff due to 100 percent buildout within the Village Build -out Plan project area as shown in Exhibit 5.8-4, 10 Year Discharge Study Map. The total additional runoff generated by commercial development of existing vacant lots within the study area during the 10-year rain event is 9.89 cfs occurring along Calle Tampico, where flows combine to create the worst case condition. Based on the Psomas Downtown Area Drainage Report, the project area is subject to flooding under the existing condition in the northern reaches of Avenida Bermudas, Desert Club Drive and all along Calle Tampico. Existing catch basins along Calle Tampico and the underground storm drain pipe network do not have the capacity to convey the 10-year peak storm runoff from the project area and adjacent neighborhood. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-25 August 2016 843 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-26 August 2016 844 ATTACH M ENT 1 CD CUfl Cu 7 CO am ` CU ,a Q LA RUNNTA COMMUNITY = FITNESS CENTER Z CW w 1 C Cu Aq- CD' 3 cu D 4 441 Q 4 4 Source: The Altum Group, 2016 E1105 The Altum Group CALLE TAMPICO CU 33 — — C `�CD Cu Q I7 C r CD C CD i LiCU D R' SfDE AL U w 0 COS Qs` CD 1,CD CU y � C I} AVENUE 59 a� F� ARROW .....'_ :::.. COMMERCU1 QED OU . . . . .. . . _ COMMERCLAL ON DUUP€D TQ YEAR INCREASE 94 RUNOW DUE To DEVELOPMENT WAMES NO ON -SE wrEInw) S08M7EA AFV (at.) PRE-0EYMPMEHI DW VJW (QID OM) PM DEffLOPMEW q$piwA (DiD QES) {, }1 U..76 0.49 0.85 } 0,70 110 243 �3 0,65 0.94 1.81 84 1.73 2.31 4AM 51 0.92 1,47 z.i7 { D.r1 0.21 D34 d on 0.55 0.93 08 0.35 0.56 0.94 (1 On 1.24 2.D9 1 1.1$ 1.7D 2.59 0 12t [,@3 Z92 Q58 M 1.52 1 0.57 0.87 1.47 14.07 ?3_96 INETI ME 9s' RhaT WE TO MrF1DM09 OF 910NO VACMT 00MllERML PMCf1S WrIHIN Ill QLM13F MADE ............ 9.ffi US N X. En�uucnng 11rni. ig rvay En iuvi,emul lhf A G_p Y3•710 Fred Rang Dae %iw 2N9 palm. F[� GA9P269 t_561Y.ti1F,415p 'lIr=Nwa�xawp.mm 1.9E0.3iP.Ofxw Ten -Year Discharge Study Map La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 5.8-4 45 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-28 August 2016 RIA T ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Existing studies (Psomas and MBI) calculate runoff tributary to Calle Tampico during the 10 year peak storm event by combining 71 cfs from the area west of Avenida Bermudas with 41.5 cfs generated between Avenida Bermudas and Desert Club Drive for a total of 112.5 cfs under the existing condition. Development of the existing vacant parcels within the study for commercial use increases the discharge along Calle Tampico by 8.8 percent, to 122.4 cfs. Conclusion The results of the analyses in the La Quinta Village Hydrology Study suggest that the level of impingement to commercial development in order to retain 10-year flows on site is largely relative to the expected increase in surface street runoff due to development of existing vacant lots within the hydrology study area. Since on -site streets and storm drain facilities along Calle Tampico do not have capacity to convey 10-year storm runoff under the existing condition, and the increase in runoff due to development of the existing vacant parcels is relatively small, the recommendation is that a "drainage mitigation" development fee be required to supplement funding for upgrades to the existing storm drain evacuation system. Mitigation Measure HWQ-3, identifies that the City of La Quinta is responsible for constructing improvements to the storm drain evacuation system in the Village Build -out project area and requires that the improvements must be made prior to commencement of development of new projects in the project area that are proposed after adoption of the Build -out Plan. Of particular concern is the construction of storm drain improvements along Calle Tampico. HWQ-3 states that the City of La Quinta shall identify the required upgrades to the system. The use of an off -site retention basin designed to capture flows generated during the 10-year storm event has been suggested as a possible design solution and involves the need for existing surface streets and storm drain facilities to provide conveyance to an off -site location when they are already beyond capacity under the existing condition. This reinforces the conclusion that a drainage mitigation fee intended to upgrade existing facilities is warranted. Mitigation Measure HWQ-4, requires that each new development project in the project area pay the development impact fee for drainage improvements at the time of building permit. Although the hydrology study prepared for the Village Build -out Plan only studied vacant parcels, there are a number of underutilized properties that the City believes could be redeveloped at an increased density than currently developed and therefore, could also add to runoff in the area. The City intends to make the necessary drainage improvements to the storm drain evacuation system in advance of build -out of the Village, thus solving the flooding problem in the project area. With implementation of the drainage improvements, and collection of development impact fees for drainage improvements, this impact would be less than significant. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-29 August 2016 847 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY d. Create or contribute runoff that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm drain systems or provide additional sources of polluted runoff See discussion of flooding and the storm evacuation system in 5.8.4.c above. e. Water Runoff that Exceeds Capacity of Drainage System See discussion of flooding and the storm evacuation system in 5.8.4.c above. f. Water Quality Degradation See discussion of flooding and the storm evacuation system in 5.8.4.a above. g-h. Flood Hazards See discussion of flooding and the storm evacuation system in 5.8.4.c above. i. Seiche, Tsunami, Mudflow Inundation from Above -Ground Storage Tanks Strong ground shaking can cause structural damage to above -ground water storage tanks, especially when they are not adequately braced and baffled. Tanks can be lifted off of foundations by the movement of sloshing water, damaging the shell and roof and causing the bottom to bulge. Water may also be released when pipes leading to the tank are sheared off. In California and Mexico, the Landers and Big Bear earthquakes in 1992, the Northridge (1994), and the Sierra El Mayor-Cucupah in 2010 all resulted in damage to water tanks, with inundation of homes down gradient also occurring in some cases. As a result of the 1992 and 1994 earthquakes, design standards for steel water tanks were revised. New tank design calls for flexible joints at connection points so that movement can occur in all directions. In addition to inundation of structures down slope, potable water supplies may be reduced, impacting availability of drinking water as well as fire flows and other emergency service needs. Water supplies may be impacted for 30 days or longer should damage occur to other critical facilities, such as aqueducts that carry imported water throughout southern California, wells, pipelines and other facilities associated with the domestic water system in the region and the project area. This emphasizes the need to inspect and retrofit tanks to make certain their structural reliability in the event of an earthquake, as well as to ensure that water supplies in reservoirs are kept at or near capacity. CVWD has ten water reservoirs in the City's planning area, with a total capacity of 44.6 million gallons. Six of the ten are above ground storage tanks located upslope from the project area along the southern portion of La Quinta Cove. All six storage tank sites have levee berms surrounding storage tanks for gradual offsite flow in the event of failure. All ten of the storage tanks are of La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-30 August 2016 848 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY welded steel, constructed to current seismic and American Water Works Association standards. The oldest was constructed to 1982 and the most recent in 2008. 5.8.5 Cumulative Impacts New development within the Village Build -out Plan project area will have the potential to create cumulative impacts if not properly mitigated to address water quality, drainage, flooding and water supply. Although new projects will increase runoff as a result of development of parking and building structures, mitigation (HWQ-1 and HWQ-2) requiring preparation and implementation of SWPPPs and WQMPs with best management practices (i.e., landscaped swales, porous pavers, etc.) would assure that individual projects maintain onsite permeability to a degree that does not cumulatively add to the project area's overall runoff potential. Measures HWQ-1 and HWQ-2 require the City to plan and construct storm drain improvements prior to commencement of development of new projects in the project area, and prepare a study that establishes development impact fees (DIF) to be paid by applicants of new projects on vacant land, or projects that are proposed to redevelop currently underutilized properties in the project area. Implementation of Mitigation Measures HWQ-4 for the payment of development impact fees for drainage improvements at the time of building permit would reduce impacts associated with flooding to less than significant levels. Although the drainage study prepared for the Village Build - out Plan only studied vacant parcels, there are a number of underutilized properties that the City believes could be redeveloped at an increased density than currently developed and therefore, could also add to runoff in the area. The City intends to make the necessary drainage improvements to the storm drain evacuation system in advance of build -out of the Village, thus mitigating the flooding problem in the project area. Finally, implementation of Mitigation Measures HWQ-5 through HWQ-11 will ensure that water conservation measures in compliance with CVWD's current UWMP (or most recent UWMP in place), are incorporated into new individual development projects to lower water usage for landscaping and to comply with Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code, Title 20, California Administrative Code Section 1601(b), and applicable sections of Title 24 of the State Code. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measures HWQ-1 through HWQ-11, all new development within the Village Build -out Plan project area will assist in minimizing cumulative impacts in regard to Hydrology and Water Quality and as a result, impacts are expected to be less than significant. 5.8.6 Mitigation Measures HWQ-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits on vacant or underutilized parcels that will be developed within the Village Build -out Plan, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared for all projects within the Village Build -out Plan that disturb La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-31 August 2016 849 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY one acre or more. The SWPPP shall list appropriate best management practices (BMPs) for the control and treatment of runoff from the project site. The applicant is responsible for the preparation and implementation of the SWPPP per the NPDES requirements and must file a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resource Control Board and receive a Waste Discharge ID Number (WDID), and have a copy of the SWPPP at the project site at all times during construction. HWQ-2 Prior to the issuance of building permits on vacant parcels within the Village Build -out Plan project area, a WQMP for post construction conditions shall list appropriate best management practices (BMPs) for the control and treatment of runoff from the project site. The WQMP must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer or his/her designee and shall demonstrate compliance with California Drainage Law in accordance with CRWQB to assure that discharge of stormwater flow from future proiects is handled in a manner that is reasonably compatible with pre -development conditions. HWQ-3 The City of La Quinta is responsible for constructing improvements to the storm drain evacuation system in the Village Build -out project area. These improvements must be made prior to commencement of development of new projects in the project area, proposed after adoption of the Build -out Plan. Subsequently, prior to issuance of buildings permits for new development on vacant properties or redevelopment of underutilized properties in the project area applicants will pay development impact fees for drainage improvements to the storm drain evacuation system. HWQ-4 Prior to project construction of new projects on vacant lands, or redevelopment projects on currently developed parcels, the project applicant shall pay a Development Impact Fee specific towards funding of storm drain upgrade improvements along Calle Tampico Ave. HWQ-5 All project development within the Village Build -out Plan shall coordinate and cooperate with CVWD to ensure City-wide compliance with current State Senate Bill x7-7 to reduce per capita urban water use by 36 percent for year 2016, and 20 percent reduction by year 2020, including landscaping conversion programs and the smart irrigation control program; expanding the availability of sustainable water supplies such as tertiary treated water, and encouraging its use for landscape irrigation purposes, especially for irrigating golf courses and other large landscaped areas, and/or other mandates imposed at the time development occurs. HWQ-6 The City shall review and amend its Development Standards to require that all new development within the Village Build -out Plan demonstrate a reduction of domestic water consumption equivalent to the CalGreen Tier One standards in effect at the time of development. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-32 August 2016 850 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY HWQ-7 The City shall continue to implement its Water Efficient Landscape ordinance by requiring that development projects within the Village Build -out Plan implement water efficient landscaping plans to meet or exceed current water efficiency standards. HWQ-8 The City shall require that new development within the Village Build -out Plan reduce its projected water consumption over "business as usual" consumption rates. HWQ-9 The City shall develop programs to allow and encourage the retrofitting of existing water intensive appliances and irrigation systems for existing development within the Village Build -out Plan. HWQ-10 The City shall continue to require that all new developments within the Village Build -out Plan use water conserving appliances and fixtures, including low -flush toilets and low -flow showerheads and faucets, as well as the application of water -conserving technologies in conformance with Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code, Title 20, California Administrative Code Section 1601(b), and applicable sections of Title 24 of the State Code. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting A. The applicant is responsible for the preparation and implementation of the SWPPP per the NPDES requirements and must file a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resource Control Board and receive a Waste Discharge ID Number (WDID). (Mitigation Measures HWQ-1 and HWQ-2) Responsible Parties: City Engineer, SWRCB B. The City will be responsible for planning and construction of drainage improvements, then be reimbursed through Development Impact Fees to be determined in a Fee Study, prior to development in the Village. (Mitigation Measures HWQ-3 and HWQ-4). Responsible Parties: City Engineer, Project Developers C. Planning Division will review all plans for development projects to ensure that they comply with all applicable CVWD and City requirements for water conservation. Planning Division shall also review the Development Standards to ensure that new development meets the CalGreen Tier One standards in effect at the time of development. (Mitigation Measure HWQ-5 through HWQ-10) Responsible Parties: Planning Division. 5.8.7 Level of Significance after Mitigation With implementation of mitigation herein, impacts in regard to Hydrology and Water Quality will be reduced to less than significant levels. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-33 August 2016 851 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.8-34 August 2016 852 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING 5.9 Land Use and Planning 5.9.1 Introduction This section of the EIR addresses potential impacts and opportunities associated with land use and planning resulting from implementation of the Village Build -out Plan project area. The existing conditions, development and land use designations within the Village Build -out Plan are described, and the potential impacts relating to development of the remaining vacant properties, as well as redevelopment of underutilized properties with more intensive uses are assessed in this section. This would include residential development at densities of 20-30 dwelling units per acre, which is higher than the existing density allowed under the City's High Density Residential designation of up to 16 dwelling units per acre. As discussed in Section 3 Project Description, the Village Commercial zoning designation allows multi -family residential dwellings such as condominiums, apartments and similar housing types at densities determined on a site specific basis and based on the development capacity for the proposed uses on the site. In addition, this section includes an assessment of associated parking impacts due to the adoption of Ordinance 528 that allowed a reduction in the number of required parking spaces for properties within the Village Commercial Zoning District, as this is a land use related issue. 5.9.2 Environmental Setting The project area consists of approximately 137 acres of land, generally located on both sides of Calle Tampico, east of Eisenhower Drive, west of Washington Street, and north of Avenue 52. Properties located on the north side of Calle Tampico, including offices, a school, a hotel and the 9.3-acre property at the northwest corner of Calle Tampico and Washington Street, currently developed as a commercial center, are included in the project area. Existing conditions in the Village Build -out Plan project area are shown in Exhibit 4-3, in Chapter 3, Project Description. The surrounding area outside the boundaries of the Build -out Plan is largely developed with residential uses. As shown in Table 5.9- 1, Existing Conditions in the Project Area, there are approximately 20 acres of vacant land in the Build - out area that could be developed with a mix of uses, such as commercial, professional, and/or residential, and as shown in Table 5.9-2, approximately 30 acres that could be redeveloped at higher density or intensity than that currently occurring on those lands. Land Use Designation Definitions Exhibit 3-5 in Chapter 3, Project Description, shows the existing General Plan land use designations for sites in the Village Build -out Plan project area. The Land Use designations are Village Commercial, General Commercial (Shopping Center), Major Community Facilities (Civic Center), and Recreational La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-1 August 2016 853 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Open Space (La Quinta Community Park). Land Uses within the Village Commercial designation include a mix of uses including retail commercial, professional office, and residential. Exhibit 5.9-1, Zoning Designations, shows the existing zoning designations for sites in the project area. Table 5.9-1 Existing Conditions in the Project Area Land Use Dwelling Units Square Feet Acres Residential Single Family 4 0.99 Multi -Family 273 14.01 Commercial Commercial 524,875 51.75 Other Land Uses Hotels + Casitas 290 11.75 Civic Center 18.82 School 12.74 Park 6.50 Vacant 20.18 Total 567 524,875 136.74 Source: City of La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Land Use Data, August 2015. Village Commercial The Village Commercial Designation applies specifically to the traditional Commercial core of the City, and allows specialty retail; such as boutiques and art galleries as well as restaurants, professional offices and services, and hotels. Apartments, condominiums and live -work space is also appropriate in this designation. As established in General Plan 2035 Policy LU-7.1 (see above), mixed use development is allowed in this designation. Mixed use projects can include vertical or horizontal combinations of land uses that are integrated through pedestrian connections and common areas; or can include residential units added to existing commercial development. Height restrictions are limited to two -stories for all development south of Calle Tampico and three to four stories for all development north of Calle Tampico, but the proposed Village Build -out Plan includes a Zoning Code Amendment to allow for the construction of buildings up to 60 feet in height. General Commercial This land use designation applies to the majority of commercial land in the City. The full range of commercial uses can occur within this designation, ranging from supermarkets and drugstores in a neighborhood shopping center, to major national retailers in large buildings. General Commercial uses also include professional offices, service businesses, restaurants, hotels or motels, research and development and warehousing or similar low impact quasi -industrial projects. As established in General Plan 2035 Policy LU-7.1, mixed use development is also appropriate in this designation. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-2 August 2016 854 ATTACH M ENT 1 DESERT FALL �G WINTER COVE i rs IQ,SPRINGIT�ME--------- I z 0 C CO - w u I O - Q 2 U W/pq �Z W LLJ ,Q W W BLUE SKY Q N pr 'r , W SCUJ E ESTADO CALLEFORTUNA Q � 0' ca Q 0 m W _ g UJ CA z z, CALLE _ U U - - J v AQ U VENIDA NUESTRA CALLE HIDALGO _ - AVENUE 52, CALLE BCELONA# ¢4, z I i1 •y •L• , ti. �f 'AM 'To of La Quinta GIS � �'!i 1 inch = 400 feet E115 The Altum Group Zoning Designations La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Environmental Impact Report AVENIDA ULTIMO AVENIDA TUJUNGA I � m O q�OMq � U AVENIDA NARANJA Legend La Quinta Village Build -out Q Project Boundary Zoning Designations CN Neighborhood Commercial I L FP Floodplain GC Golf Course MC Major Community Facilities PR Parks and Recreation AVENUE 5 ® RC Cove Residential f — v RL Low Density Residential RM Medium Density _J Residential Right -of -Way VC Village Commercial Exhibit 5-9.1 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-4 August 2016 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Major Community Facilities The Major Community Facilities Land Use designation has been assigned to existing or planned municipal, educational or public facilities; such as City and Desert Sands Unified School District facilities and buildings, utility facilities and buildings, fire stations, and public parking lots and similar uses. Recreational Open Space The Recreational Open Space designation applies to parks, recreation facilities (such as driving ranges, club houses and athletic facilities), and public and private golf courses. Zoning Designation Definitions Zoning in the project area include Village Commercial, Neighborhood Commercial (Shopping Center), Major Community Facilities (Civic Center), and Parks and Recreation (La Quinta Community Park). As part of the General Plan and Zoning Consistency Review conducted during the General Plan Update, Commercial Zoning designations, including the Neighborhood Commercial designation, are consistent with the General Commercial Land Use Designation. Although no General Plan Amendment is proposed, the Village Build -out Plan has the potential to add 1,230 dwelling units, and 799,786 square feet of commercial space, on approximate 137 acres of land. 5.9.3 Applicable Goals and Policies City of La Quinta Goal LU-2 High quality design that complements and enhances the City. Goal LU-3 Safe and identifiable neighborhoods that provide a sense of place. Policy LU-3.1 Encourage the preservation of neighborhood character and assure a consistent and compatible land use pattern. rnnl 111_9 A balanced and varied economic base which provides a broad range of goods and services to the City's residents and the region. Policy LU-6.1 Commercial land use designations shall allow a full range of retail, office, resort and institutional businesses in the City. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-5 August 2016 857 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Policy LU-6.3 Support and encourage the expansion of the resort industry as a key component of the City's economic base. Goal LU-7 Innovative land uses in the Village and on Highway 111. Policy LU-7.1 Encourage the use of mixed use development in appropriate locations. Program LU-7.1.o: Establish a Mixed Use Overlay for all the commercial zoning designations. Policy LU-7.4 Develop incentives for Mixed Use projects. Program LU-7.4.a: Consider density bonuses, modified parking requirements, expedited entitlement and building permit processing and fee waivers for Mixed Use projects. Policy LU-7.6 Review and amend, as necessary, the Village Design Guidelines to allow maximum flexibility for Mixed Use projects. Goal SC-1 A community that provides the best possible quality of life for all its residents. Policy SC-1.4 Reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions at a minimum consistent with the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (also see Air Quality Element). Program SC-1.4.a: Require all new development proposals to demonstrate consistency with the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan. Policy SC-1.5 All new development shall include resource efficient development principles. Program SC-1.5.a: All new development shall be constructed to meet or exceed CalGreen Building Codes. Program SC-1.5.b: Amend the Zoning Ordinance to provide incentives and development standard concessions for mixed use or energy efficient design. Program SC-1.5.c: New development projects shall include vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle connections to the greatest extent possible, both through the project and connecting to adjacent projects. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-6 August 2016 858 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Program SC-1.5.d: New commercial and mixed use projects shall incorporate useable public spaces, and interconnect those public spaces consistent with resource efficient design principles. Policy SC-1.7 Encourage the retrofitting of existing buildings and projects with resource efficient design principles to the greatest extent possible. Program SC-1.7.a: Amend the Zoning Ordinance to provide incentives for the redevelopment of existing projects to include residential development, pedestrian and alternative transportation connections and improvements, and other design features. Program SC-1.7.b: Develop an enhanced program for the processing of entitlements for redevelopment projects which incorporates substantial resource efficient components, or propose conversion to mixed use. Program SC-1.7.c: Develop a financial incentive program for creative redevelopment of commercial projects into mixed use projects, particularly those that provide added economic development benefit to the City. Policy SC-1.8 Expand the City's participation in Healthy City programs. Program SC-1.8. c Encourage farmers' markets outside the Village, accessible to all parts of the City. Policy ED-1.3 Encourage the expansion of the Village as a specialty retail, dining and residential destination. Program ED - 1.3.a: Maintain, in the Zoning Ordinance, standards and guidelines that encourage the development of a pedestrian friendly, interconnected neighborhood with a balance of residential and commercial development. Program ED - 1.3.b: Include the Village in the Mixed Use Overlay in the Zoning Ordinance. Program ED - 1.3.c: Continue to sponsor and support special events in the Village and at the Civic Center, as a means of attracting visitors to the area. r.nAi Pin-1 The protection and preservation of native and environmentally significant biological resources and their habitats. Policy BIO-1.1 Continue to implement the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-7 August 2016 859 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Program B/0-1.1.a: Building permits shall not be issued for projects required to pay the MSHCP local development mitigation fee until such time as the fee has been paid to the City. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Sustainable Communities Strategy SCAG provided the City of La Quinta with a letter in response to the Notice of Preparation of the Draft EIR in November 2015. Comments from SCAG were related to the projects consistency with SCAGs 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan -Sustainable Communities Strategy document (RTPSCS), and how to evaluate the project. However, since then, SCAG has adopted the 2016-2040, RTPSCS (April 2016) with an updated set of Goals and Guiding Policies. It is the April 2016 RTPSCS that was used to evaluate the project. SB 375, the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008, requires metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) such as SCAG to develop a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) — an element of the RTP —to strive to reach the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target established for each region by the California Air Resources Board. SCAG's 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy is a plan for mobility, accessibility, sustainability and a high quality of life in the region. It is first and foremost, a transportation plan that integrates land use planning into its framework to improve mobility and access to transportation options in response to SB375. A natural segue from this concept is the idea that compact, walkable neighborhoods similar to that proposed in the Village Build -out Plan. The RTCSCS was adopted in April 2016 and is available at the following web address: http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/draft/d2016RTPSCS.pdf The Goals and Guiding Policies set forth in the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS are listed here. Most of these can be adapted and implemented at the local level by the City of La Quinta such as maximizing mobility and accessibility for all people and goods. This is being achieved by the City's commitment to good roads where intersections can accommodate round-abouts instead of 4-way stops or traffic signals where vehicles stop and idle. 2016 RTP-SCS Goals 1. Align the plan investments and policies with improving regional economic development and competitiveness. 2. Maximize mobility and accessibility for all people and goods in the region. 3. Ensure travel safety and reliability for all people and goods in the region. 4. Preserve and ensure a sustainable regional transportation system. 5. Maximize the productivity of our transportation system. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-8 August 2016 -M ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING 6. Protect the environment and health of our residents by improving air quality and encouraging active transportation (e.g., bicycling and walking). 7. Actively encourage and create incentives for energy efficiency, where possible. 8. Encourage land use and growth patterns that facilitate transit and active transportation. 9. Maximize the security of the regional transportation system through improved system monitoring, rapid recovery planning, and coordination with other security agencies. Note: SCAG does not yet have an agreed -upon security performance measure. 2016 RTP-SCS Guiding Policies 1. Transportation investments shall be based on SCAG's adopted regional Performance Indicators. 2. Ensuring safety, adequate maintenance and efficiency of operations on the existing multimodal transportation system should be the highest RTP/SCS priorities for any incremental funding in the region. 3. RTP/SCS land use and growth strategies in the RTP/SCS will respect local input and advance smart growth initiatives. 4. Transportation demand management (TDM) and active transportation will be focus areas, subject to Policy 1. 5. HOV gap closures that significantly increase transit and rideshare usage will be supported and encouraged, subject to Policy 1. 6. The RTP/SCS will support investments and strategies to reduce non -recurrent congestion and demand for single occupancy vehicle use, by leveraging advanced technologies. 7. The RTP/SCS will encourage transportation investments that result in cleaner air, a better environment, a more efficient transportation system and sustainable outcomes in the long run. 8. Monitoring progress on all aspects of the Plan, including the timely implementation of projects, programs, and strategies, will be an important and integral component of the Plan. Village Land Use Design Guidelines Development in the Village Build -out Plan project area is currently subject to the standards set forth in the Village at La Quinta Design Guidelines. One element of the proposed Build -out Plan is the rescinding of the design guidelines and reliance on the City's Development Review procedures that require that a project be subject to review by the Architectural and Landscape Review Board and the Planning Commission. This is discussed further in Section 5.9.4, Project Impact Analysis. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-9 August 2016 861 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING 5.9.4 Project Impact Analysis Thresholds of Significance The thresholds for this section are derived from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, and are used to determine the level of potential effect. The significant criteria are at least, in part, based on the recommendations set forth in Section 15064 of the CEQA Guidelines. In addition, the City is including a threshold to address impacts associated with potential for a project to adversely impact parking in the Village Build -out Plan project area. For analysis purposes, the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan would have a significant effect on land use and planning if it is determined that the project will: a. Physically divide an established community; b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect; c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan; and d. Cause a significant reduction in the amount of parking available in the Village Build -out Plan project area. a. Divide an Established Community Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will not physically divide an established community. The objective of the Build -out Plan is to focus development onto existing undeveloped vacant lots and redevelop underutilized properties, when the opportunity arises, with a variety of mixed -use residential and commercial development by offering dining, entertainment and a wide variety of specialty retail options including boutiques, art galleries, restaurants, professional offices and services, and hotels. As discussed above, the Village Commercial designation allows for the proposed increased residential density of up to 20-30 dwelling units per acre, which is higher than the density allowed under the High Density Residential designation of up to 16 dwelling units per acre. Table 5.9-2, Existing and Potential New Development in the Project Area, lists new land uses that could be developed on the vacant parcels, and potential land uses that could be developed on the underutilized properties. As discussed in Chapter 3, Project Description, the Villas at Old Town, a mixed -use project recently approved, consists of 20,000 square feet of ground floor retail space, underground parking, and 84 condominiums above, and to be built in two phases on an approximately 3.5-acre site at the southeast corner of Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive. The project represents a density of 24 units per acre. This project is also included in the build -out calculations as shown in Table 5.9-2. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-10 August 2016 :.. ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING There are currently 33 single family and 251 multi -family dwelling units within the Village Build -out Plan area. Most of these are found along the south side of Calle Tampico between Eisenhower Drive and Avenida Villa, the northwestern portion of the Build -out Plan project area (Silverhawk Apartments), and along the west side of Eisenhower Drive between Calle Tampico and Avenida Montezuma. All of these existing residential areas will remain unaffected by the Plan. Therefore, impacts in regard to dividing an established community as a result of implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will be less than significant. Table 5.9-2 Existing and Potential New Development in the Project Area Existing Potential Existing New Non - Land Use Acres Residential New Non- Residential Units Residential Residential Square TOTAL (DU)' Units (DU) Square Feet Feet Vacant Land 20.70 -- 436 -- 288,330 -- Land with the Potential for 30.20 -- 794 12,400 511,456 -- Redevelopment Existing Developed 284 DU Properties with no +290 hotel Change in Land Use 85.90 rooms & -- 139,525 -- or Increased Density casitas 284 DU 1482 DU, 290 +290 hotel hotel/ casita Total 136.74 1,230 DU 151,925 799,786 rooms & 960,711 casitas square feet Source: City of La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Land Use Data, August 2015. Notes: 1. Residential unit count includes existing residences b. Conflict with Applicable Land Use Plans and Policies Village at La Quinta Design Guideline As part of the proposed project, the Village at La Quinta Design Guidelines, adopted in 1998 will be rescinded as the City believes that the guidelines have become outdated and are too restrictive with regard to types of architecture and landscape that are currently being considered in the Village. The General Plan Land Use Element includes Goal LU-7.4 to develop incentives for Mixed Use Projects, and Policy 7.6 to review and amend, as necessary, the Village Design Guidelines to allow maximum flexibility for Mixed Use projects. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-11 August 2016 863 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING City staff has reviewed the guidelines in light of recent development proposals in the Village, and has recommended that the Village Design Guidelines be rescinded and instead, rely on its Development Review Procedures which include the following elements: • Pre -application Review • Site Development Permit • Conditional Use Permit In addition, development projects are subject to review by the Architectural and Landscape Review Board, and the Planning Commission. These procedures implement the goals and policies of the General Plan Land Use Element for high quality design (Goal LU-2), allow a full range of retail, resort, and institutional businesses in the City (Goal LU-6, Policy 6.1), encourage innovative land uses in the Village (Goal LU-7), and develop incentives for Mixed Use projects by considering density bonuses, modified parking requirements, expedited entitlement and building permit processing and fee waivers for mixed use projects ( Goal 7.4, Policy 7.4a). Therefore, rescinding the Village Design Guidelines would have a less than significant on the Village environment by allowing a more flexible process for reviewing and approving a variety of architectural styles, densities and heights, that will blend together creating a more dynamic and creative Village. Zoning Code Amendment The proposed Village Build -out Plan includes a Zoning Code Amendment to modify the text regarding height restrictions for the Village Commercial designation. The proposed zone text amendment would be subject to discretionary review, and if adopted, would allow for the construction of buildings up to 60 feet in height, subject to the City's Development Review procedures outlined above. Other than the proposed zone text amendment, no changes in land use or zoning are proposed for the Village Build -out Plan project area. Nonetheless, all development projects proposed within the project area would be subject to payment of development impact fees (DIF) and Quimby Act fees. Furthermore, by amending the zone text for the Village Commercial designation, development in regard to amended height restrictions would have more flexibility to take advantage of underutilized properties, and would assist in meeting General Plan GOAL LU-6 by strengthening and balancing the economic base. Calle Tampico as an Image Corridor The intent of the amendment is to preserve Calle Tampico as a designated Image Corridor which currently offers direct views of the nearby Coral Mountains to the west. See Section 5.1 Aesthetics, for a discussion of Image Corridors. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-12 August 2016 864 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING SCAG RTP/SCS The RTP/SCS considers new patterns of development as the regional economy continues to recover and grow, the composition of our population changes, the housing market responds to evolving needs, and demands and mobility innovations emerge. The Plan also includes a long-term strategic vision for the region that will help guide decisions for transportation and how we use land, as well as the public investments in both, through 2040. According to the RTP/SCS (page 50), planning for the future includes facing challenges, including the convergence of interests between two distinct population groups—millennials, who today range in age from 20 to 35, and aging baby boomers, who range in age from 51 to 70. Millennials represent 22.4 percent of the region's total population and rely less on automobiles than have previous generations; they are less apt to acquire drivers licenses, drive fewer miles and conduct fewer overall trips. SCAG's research also shows that millennials often prefer to live in denser, mixed -use urban areas well served by transit, rather than decentralized suburban areas. This trend has resulted in an increasing demand for new multifamily housing. Millennials also are more likely than other groups to embrace a range of mobility options, including shared cars, biking, transit and walking. These evolving preferences for transportation and housing are significant because Millennials will account for a large part of Southern California's overall population in 2040. In the near term, their housing and transportation preferences, when combined with the needs of baby boomers to maintain their independence, and who are also downsizing and looking for housing options, could significantly change how Southern California develops. The proposed Village Build -out Plan is right in line with the intent of the RTP/SCS goals and guiding policies regarding the creation of opportunities to increase densities of both residential and non- residential uses, to accommodate millennials seeking denser, mixed use urban areas and baby boomers downsizing and looking for opportunities to remain independent as they age by reducing the need to drive for goods and services. C. Conflict with Conservation Plans Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will not conflict with an established conservation plan adopted by the City. The nearest point of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area, the closest CVMSHCP conservation area, lies approximately 0.55 mile south of the Build -out Plan, which is the east branch of the Coral Mountains. Because the Build -out Plan is located within the CVMHCP fee area, all future development projects within the Build -out Plan will be subject to a mitigation fee to ensure the future availability of funds to purchase regional conservation lands. These fees are intended to offset the potential impacts of development on the natural environment. Payment of CVMHCP fees will meet General Plan GOAL BIO-1 and Policy BIO-1.1 by protecting, La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-13 August 2016 865 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING preserving and continuing the City's implementation of the CVMSHCP. Therefore, project impacts in regard to conflict with conservation plans will be less than significant. d. Cause a Significant Reduction in the Amount of Parking Available in the Village Parking Demand Management The City of La Quinta approved the Village District Parking Study in 2006 that identified short-term and long-term strategies to improve parking in the Village. The study identified 2,919 parking spaces within the study area, with 2,417 spaces in off- street parking lots, and the remaining 502 space located on the streets within the project area. Residential parking was not counted toward the total. In September 2015, the City Council adopted Ordinance 528 to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2015-0001, amending Section 9.150.060 (spaces required by use) to allow for a reduced number of required parking spaces for properties within the Village Commercial Zoning District. The staff report indicated that additional parking demand may be experienced at existing on -street parking, the City parking lot at Avenida Bermudas/Montezuma, and existing private parking lots; however, a majority of the time on -street parking and the City parking lot are not fully utilized. The exception is during special events and peak periods in season. The Ordinance was adopted to codify the practice already undertaken by the City to allow a reduction by approximately 50 percent of the amount of parking allowed by land use in the Village Commercial Zoning District. Since 2006, a number of new projects have been developed in the Village Build -out Plan project area. These projects added an additional 386 off-street parking spaces, increasing the total number of spaces in parking lots to 2,803. The more recent projects are listed in Table 5.9-3, Village Construction Since 2006, and shown in Exhibit 5.9-2, Village Parking Aerial. Following Exhibit 5.9-2 are three exhibits with photos of the sites enumerated in Exhibit 5.9-2. These are: Exhibit 5.9-3, Village Parking Study Photos — West, Exhibit 5.9-4, Village Parking Study Photos — Northeast, and Exhibit 5.9-5, Village Parking Study Photos — Southeast. Table 5.9-3 Village Construction Since 2006 Project Parking Demand per City Requirements' Parking Supply Included with Project' Village Park Animal Hospital 29 16 La Quinta Museum 27 8 Cornell Building 46 19 Tower Market 19 19 Old Town (Avenida Bermudas) 176 42 Old Town (Desert Club Drive) 176 40 Plaza at Calle Tampico 160 165 Plaza Estado 43 25 La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-14 August 2016 :.e ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Table 5.9-3 Village Construction Since 2006 (Continued) Project Parking Demand per City Requirements' Parking Supply Included with Project' Dixon Building 18 17 Kelly Building 26 19 Nispero/Sun Vista Offices 28 16 Total Parking Spaces 748 386 Source: City of La Quinta Subsequent Parking Analysis, 2016. Notes: 1. Parking Demand based on City Zoning Ordinance prior to adoption of Ordinance 528 in September 2015. 2. Allowed on a project by project basis, based on type of use, and the concept of trip combining whereby visitors frequent more than one business during their trip. Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will allow the continued development of the Village with a mix of residential, retail, commercial office and professional office uses to create an urban environment at a human scale, with fewer motor vehicles, so that people feel comfortable walking, riding a bicycle, or driving an electric golf cart to and around the Village. Future residential development projects will be required to provide adequate parking for units built. However, for the other uses and as discussed above, the mixed use concept provides efficiencies of land use whereby people will likely visit one or more restaurants, shops or offices during a trip to the Village, resulting in a lower demand for parking than what is generally required for individual land uses. And, because the Build -out Plan includes both residential and non-residential uses, local residents would not have to drive to shop or obtain commercial or professional services. As documented in The City of La Quinta Village District Parking Study (Carl Walker, Inc. 2006), significant parking surplus existed in almost all study areas within the Village. However, most of the surplus parking in the Village was designated as private with restricted use, which at that time, approximately 20.8 percent (or 606 spaces) were designated as public parking and with the remaining 79.2 percent (or 2,313 spaces) of parking supply restricted to private parking. To alleviate this unused potential, the study recommended that the City adopt a methodology within the study (Section 3.03) pertinent to, 1) monitoring parking utilization, 2) applying parking demand ratios in a shared parking model, and 3) improving the utilization of nearby parking supplies. Furthermore, fulfillment of a quantification analysis for each individual project within the Build -out Plan should be performed in order to determine project's cumulative impact in creating deficit parking and to provide additional measures to counteract this deficit. These recommendations have been incorporated into the Parking Demand Management strategies identified in this Section. Based on City Municipal Code Section 9.150.060 and the assumption that two spaces are needed per dwelling unit and one space is needed for every 250 square feet of commercial development, there will be a need for 5,680 parking spaces at build out of the village, based on proposed land uses. If it La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-15 August 2016 867 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING is assumed that fifty percent of the required parking will be developed, which is consistent with projects developed in the Village since 2006 (See Table 5.9-3), there will be a need for 2,840 parking spaces. As documented in The City of Lo Quinta Village District Parking Study (Carl Walker, Inc. 2006), there was a surplus of 1,434 parking spaces in 2006, but projects developed since 2006 have reduced the surplus to 1,072 spaces. Therefore at build out of the Village, there will be a need for at least 1,768 parking spaces to accommodate the additional proposed development and redevelopment. At approximately 300 square feet per parking space, 12 acres of land will be needed for surface level parking, 6 acres for parking structures with two levels, and 4 acres for parking structures with three levels. Parking structures will likely require additional area to accommodate for ramps, stairways, etc.) This is assuming that all these parking spaces would need to be developed within the Village. However, through implementation of the Parking Demand Management Strategies (Table 5.4-9), there may be opportunities for remote parking with shuttle service, shared parking between adjacent properties, and peripheral locations for parking lots. Parking Management Strategies The City is committed to limiting the number of motor vehicles that enter the Village through the implementation of traffic calming (round-abouts) and pedestrian/bicycle infrastructure (enhanced sidewalks, bike lanes, etc.) and Parking Management Strategies. These are included below, followed by Table 5.9-4, Implementation Process for Parking Management Strategies, where a sample of the strategies that the City may adopt are shown to be implemented over a five-year period. PM-1. Educational Programs • Educate businesses on ways to incentivize carpooling, public transportation, walking, and bicycling as a mode of transportation for employees. • Educate the public about the operations and benefits of various parking strategies as these are implemented within the study area. PM-2. Static Parking Information • Continue static event -based signage during events such as the La Quinta Arts Foundation Festival, the Old Town Car Show, and other events in the La Quinta Village. • Enhance parking lot signage and branding of public parking lots. • Work with private parties to allow public parking on private parking lots when businesses are closed. • Consider regulating signage on private parking facilities. PM-3. Shared Parking • Condition new developments so they accommodate shared parking. PM-4. Spillover and Overflow Parking Management La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-16 August 2016 IMF; ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING • Conduct periodic parking occupancy studies in peak periods to determine and monitor the prevalence of shoppers and employers parking in residential areas, as well as maximum occupancy of current public areas. • Consider instituting resident -only parking programs as appropriate in areas where spillover and overflow parking becomes common. Programs based on community dialogue and pricing options. • Consider a pilot program for participation in an on -street parking program, in which residents may park for free, shoppers and employees pay to park, and revenue is used for neighborhood improvements. PM-5. Transit/Shuttle • Create a transit/shuttle program similar to the programs used on El Paseo in Palm Desert, as well as Downtown Palm Springs. Identify peak periods of parking to allow for shuttling shoppers and employees to and from Old Town focal point. This will provide for more convenient access and service available to parking located furthest away from the center of the La Quinta Village. PM-6. Walkability to Improve Parking Utilization • Establish a system of walking routes specialized towards a topic such as historic sites like the La Quinta Museum, arts like the Old Town Artisan Studio, or health -oriented walking loops. PM-7. Class 3 Bikeway to Improve Parking Utilization • Consider construction of a Class 3 Bikeway (Shared Lane) within the heart of Old Town and following through the Walkability improvements for greater promotion of a healthy -living lifestyle, tourism, and alleviation in overflow parking. Confirmation of this recommendation would require engineering studies to determine the feasibility and costs of this strategy. Parking Supply Strategies PS-1. Peripheral Parking • Establish peripheral locations that will allow for access during all events and summer. • Seek enhancements such as shading and walking paths to address heat issues. • Enter into partnerships with landowners and businesses to build peripheral parking structures and/or surface spaces. PS-2. Capacity Enhancements in Summer (Off -Season) • Construct shaded walkway from off -site parking to destinations of shoppers and employees. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-17 August 2016 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-18 August 2016 870 L 60. ■� y �,,p ram?- orb `.�!- r o C'i k Vim R�.. Jk Yllh �'. �' Jl�T, 'I'.:+.� �. a �� ,I'��f yam• � �,ti b W .� Y it MW e t LU Ui 4%6t, RAJ M. - N_UF _� - l Ir'# ,� . �� _ •-tea 4V7. . M y L' � A k .� •� c S I..y d rf u 3• — J w_ ¢ .. ' uJ r —s:•r gal y a Mrs: • _ ALLE HID4L-G© -- y _ - - r {n i 10 jL _ ail LU jL .:2 Source: City of La Quinta, 2016 E115 The Altum Group Village Parking Aerial La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report N W a;/6 E S ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-20 August 2016 872 I I Village Park Animal Hospital 51-230 Eisenhower Drive 3 1 Cornell Building 77-935 Calle Tampico Road Source: The Altum Group, 2016 7G The Altum Group 21 La Quinta Museum 77-885 Avenida Montezuma 41 Tower Market 77-985 Avenida Montezuma Village Parking Study Photos - West La Quinta Village Build Out Plan EIR Exhibit 73 •9-3 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-22 August 2016 874 S Old Town (Avenida Bermudas) Southeast Corner of Calle Tampico and Avenida Bermudas 7 Plaza at CaIle Tampico l 78-134 Calle Tampico Road Source: The Altum Group, 2016 7G The Altum Group 6 1 Old Town (Desert Club Dr.) 77-885 Avenida Montezuma 7 con't I Plaza at CaIle Tampico Jules Market 78-130 Calle Tampico Road Village Parking Study Photos - Northeast La Quinta Village Build Out Plan EIR Exhibit 75 .9-4 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-24 August 2016 T 81 Plaza Estado 78-1 15 Calle Estado 101 Kelly Building 1 51-555 Desert Club Drive Source: The Altum Group, 2016 EIIS The Altum Group 9 1 Dixon Building 51-350 Desert Club Dr. 111 Nispero/Sun Vista Offices 51-625 Desert Club Drive Village Parking Study Photos - Southeast La Quinta Village Build Out Plan EIR Exhibit 5.9-5 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-26 August 2016 878 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Zoning/Administration Strategies PZ-1. Parking Conditions • Condition new developments, major remodels, and CUPS to include applicable parking management strategies. PZ-2. Parking Time Limits and Regulations • Create parking time limits and regulations under a pricing system and determine whether modifications are required to time limits for special events and in -season activities. PZ-3. Business Improvement District • Determine if the business community is interested in a Business Improvement District, to create an assessment formula with revenue generated and reinvested into parking, and access management programs to benefit the Village area. Table 5.9-4 is not intended to be a complete list but rather an example of the strategies that are likely to be adopted in the Village to provide the greatest opportunities for motor vehicle parking given that the alternative transportation modes to get into and around the Village will play a greater role in mobility under the Village Build -out Plan. For example, although listed in the menu of strategies, paid parking stalls or metered parking are not included in Table 5.9-4. These strategies would be discussed with the business community at such time that a Business Improvement District is considered, which is listed in Table 5.9-4 as occurring in Year 2. Proposed traffic infrastructure improvements in the Village include converting some stop controlled intersections to roundabouts, constructing enhanced sidewalks and protected bike/golf cart lanes, and provide additional pedestrian street crossings to encourage residents and visitors to walk, bicycle, or ride a golf cart rather than coming to the Village by car. Implementation of parking strategies such as creating peripheral parking lots, shuttle service and, where feasible, conditioning new projects to enter into shared parking agreements will reduce parking demand. Furthermore, requiring new projects to perform a quantification analysis and incorporate methodology from the 2006 Traffic Study would further ensure reduced parking demand. By implementing these strategies through Mitigation Measure LU-1, impacts in regard to parking demand will be reduced to less than significant. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-27 August 2016 879 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Table 5.9-4 Implementation Process for Parking Management Strategies Entity Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 and 5 Continue static Enhance branding for Expand Expand event -based signage lots and regulate Walkability Walkability (PM2) signage (PM2) Routes (PM6) Routes (PM6) Pilot program for Conduct parking shuttle service (PM5) occupancy study to Condition new review progress (PM4) City developments so Expand Walkability they accommodate Routes (PM6) shared parking. Class 3 Bikeway (PM3) implemented (PM7) Seek peripheral location for parking (psi) Partner with City on Implement Education Implement Implement City & Business designing education Program (PM1) Education Education Community programs for Establish a Business Program Program (PM1) community (PM1) Improvement District (PM1) (PZ 3) City &Parking Partner with City on Condition new Operators/ shared parking developments so they Designated Staff explorations (PM3) accommodate shared parking. (PM3) Participate with City Expand Expand City & Residential in monitoring Walkability Walkability Community programs (PM4) Routes (PM6) Routes (PM6) Establish Walkability Routes (PM6) 5.9.5 Cumulative Impacts The Village Build -out Plan project area is a unique area in the City of La Quinta and development within the project area will occur within the 137-acre project area, over a period of many years. The Plan is consistent with existing land use designations and building heights and densities will be considered on a case by case basis as projects are proposed. Therefore, with thoughtful planning of new development and adherence to goals, policies and programs as identified in this Section, all new development within the Village Build -out Plan project area will assist in minimizing cumulative impacts in regard to land use and cumulative impacts are expected to be less than significant. With regard to SCAG's RTPSCS strategies, the successful implementation of the Village Build -out Plan would be in line with many of the goals and guiding policies, by creating a neighborhood of residential and non-residential uses where residents can live, work and play without getting into a motor vehicle, La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-28 August 2016 ::11 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING and where visitors can park and walk or bike through the Village. This would result in the reduction on the generation of greenhouse gasses which is the major goal of SB 375. The SCAG goals that can be applied to the Village Build -out Plan are repeated here but revised to specifically show how the Village Build -out Plan addresses them. Some goals are truly regional and do not translate at the local level, and these have not been repeated here. RTP/SCS Goals 2. Maximize mobility and accessibility for all people and goods in the City. The City can achieve this goal with the Village Build -out Plan by having flexible zoning districts where a mix of uses are allowed either by right or by CUP, and by making road improvements to increase pedestrian/bicycle access and safety, and by replacing intersection stop controls with roundabouts that allow the continuous flow of traffic, 3. Ensure travel safety and reliability for all people and goods in the City. By making the road improvements identified in this EIR, this goal can be achieved in the Village. (see Exhibit 4-8 in Chapter 4, Project Description, and evaluated in Section 5.14, Traffic and Circulation). 6. Protect the environment and health of our residents by improving air quality and encouraging active transportation (e.g., bicycling and walking). (see explanation in the previous bullet) 7. Actively encourage and create incentives for energy efficiency, where possible. This is achieved through the City's commitment to reducing energy usage through implementation of mitigation measures in Section 5.2, Air Quality that include the requirement that development projects exceed the energy standards set forth in the California Building Code Energy Efficiency Standards, require low -flow water fixtures in all new projects, and require installation of ENERGY STAR compliant appliances. 8. Encourage land use and growth patterns that facilitate transit and active transportation. The intent of the Village Build -out Plan is to encourage such growth in the City's traditional downtown core —the Village, in order to create a sustainable community where residents and visitors do not have to depend on motor vehicles as transportation; where pedestrian and bicycle improvements are being made that allow the safe travel paths throughout the Village, and where SunLine can increase its presence in the area as demand to visit the Village grows. RTC/SCS Guiding Policies 3. RTP/SCS land use and growth strategies in the RTP/SCS will respect local input and advance smart growth initiatives. SCAG encourages cities to adopt local strategies for meeting the intent of SB 375 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. By implementing the Village Build -out Plan, the City of La Quinta intends to reduce dependence on motor vehicles, and require energy efficient residential and non-residential uses to be developed, thus reducing these emissions. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-29 August 2016 881 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING 4. Transportation demand management (TDM) and active transportation will be focus areas, subject to SCAG's adopted regional performance indicators. Locally, the City of La Quinta is adopting TDM and active transportation strategies (see discussion in Chapter 4, Project Description, beginning on page 4-23, and also in Section 5.14, Traffic and Circulation, beginning on page 5.14-77). 7. The RTP/SCS will encourage transportation investments that result in cleaner air, a better environment, a more efficient transportation system and sustainable outcomes in the long run. The Village Build -out Plan is consistent with these guiding policies by creating safe pedestrian and cycling infrastructure (new sidewalks and bike lanes), allowing electric vehicles (golf carts) to also use the bike lanes, and increasing the number of roundabouts in the Village to eliminate 4-way stop controlled intersection (either stop signs or traffic signals). It is the City's intent to maximize the use of roundabouts, bike lanes, and enhanced sidewalks (wider) to reduce vehicle trips and thus reduce greenhouse gas emissions. 5.9.6 Mitigation Measures LU-1 The City of La Quinta is committed to the success of the Village becoming a more livable place by creating a more accessible place for residents and visitors to live and visit while downplaying the need for motor vehicles. To that end, and for each new individual project, the City shall implement a required quantification analysis, methodology in the 2006 City of La Quinta Village District Parking Study, parking management strategies, parking supply strategies, and zoning/administration strategies beginning with those identified in Table 5.9-4. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting A. The Planning Division is responsible for reviewing each project that is proposed within the Build - out Plan project area in consideration of parking requirements. Responsible Parties: Planning Division. 5.9.7 Level of Significance after Mitigation With implementation of parking management strategies as set forth in Table 5.9-4, a required quantification analysis, methodology in the 2006 City of La Quinta Village District Parking Study, and conducting annual parking occupancy studies in peak periods to determine and monitor the prevalence of shoppers and employers parking in residential areas, as well as maximum occupancy of current public areas, impacts on the Village associated with reduction in the amount of parking availability, would be reduced to less than significant. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.9-30 August 2016 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.10 NOISE 5.10 Noise 5.10.1 Introduction This section describes existing noise conditions in the La Quinta Village and analyzes the potential impacts caused by various potential noise sources associated with build out of future projects in the proposed Village Build -Out Plan. This noise section does not evaluate noise impacts for a specific project, but analyzes the future impacts that are anticipated to occur in the project area over time. The results of the acoustical analysis prepared for the 2035 General Plan are presented in this section of the EIR. This section also sets forth noise -related mitigation measures, which will effectively reduce construction, operational and traffic noise impacts to acceptable levels. Sources for the preparation of this section are listed in Chapter 9, References. 5.10.2 Existing Conditions Noise is defined as unwanted sound and can have serious physiological and psychological effects on people, ranging from the disturbance of sleep to hearing loss. Although noise has been accepted as a necessary by-product of urban development, it can become an environmental hazard. A variety of components of the urban environment generate noise; these include construction equipment and activities, motor vehicles, air traffic, mechanical equipment, household appliances, and other sources. Primary sources of noise throughout the City are caused primarily by motor vehicle traffic on City streets, particularly major roadways. This includes general operation of cars, trucks, and bus lines. Other noise generators in the City include those associated with commercial uses and construction noise. Construction noise is generally short-term and is generated by construction equipment, including trucks, bulldozers, graders, concrete mixers, pile drivers and other mobile and fixed construction equipment. The effects of noise increase dramatically when incompatible land uses are located next to one another. Potential land use incompatibilities include residential areas or other sensitive receptors located near industrial and commercial uses. Noise Fundamentals The changes in air pressure which result in sound are most often measured in decibels (dB). That measurement is further modified by the A -weighted decibel scale (dBA), which gives less weight to very low and very high sounds, consistent with the way a human ear reacts to sound. A conversation between two people measures about 60 dBA, while construction equipment can register at 110 dBA. Most people cannot identify an increase in sound of less than 3 dB, and the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.10-1 August 2016 883 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.10 NOISE structure of the human ear causes us to perceive that a sound that is 10 dB higher than another is twice as loud. The City of La Quinta measures intensity of sound and bases noise standards on the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). CNEL is the average intensity of a sound over a 24-hour period. It accounts for the decrease in background noise levels that occur during evening and nighttime hours, as well as people's increased sensitivity to noise during these times. Penalty factors are added for sounds that occur in evening and nighttime hours. Noise sources can result from "line sources" or "point sources". Line sources include linear sources of noise, such as a freeway or busy street. Point sources are generally stationary, such as HVAC units or air compressors. Noise transmission is affected by a variety of factors, such as temperature, wind speed and direction, as well as the type of ground surface. Soft ground surfaces tend to reduce sound levels better than hard surfaces. This reduction of sound intensity caused by surfaces, walls, vegetation or other material is called attenuation. Effective noise barriers, such as walls or berms, can help reduce noise levels by 10 to 15 decibels. These types of barriers can provide relief from traffic noise. Vegetation, on the other hand, is less effective for reducing noise levels. For a noise barrier to work, walls need to be high enough and long enough to block the view of a road. Regulatory Setting The State has established guidelines for appropriate noise level ranges for a variety of land uses within a community. The range of allowable exterior noise levels for various land uses is shown in Table 5.10-1, Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments. This matrix is used to ensure noise compatibility of proposed land uses and helps predict the future noise environment. Where sensitive land uses will be exposed to noise levels of 60 dBA CNEL or higher, an acoustical study is required, according to the La Quinta General Plan. In residential areas in California, the standard is a CNEL of 65 dBA. Mitigation measures are required where sensitive land uses will be exposed to noise levels greater than 65 dBA CNEL. Interior noise standards are provided by Chapter 12 of the California Building Code. According to the Code, interior noise levels from exterior sources shall not exceed 45 dB in any habitable room. Section 9.100.210 of the City's Municipal Code establishes base ambient noise level limits for noise sensitive and other non-residential uses based on time of day. Table 5.10-2, Exterior Noise Limits, shows exterior noise limits established by the City. Noise sensitive land uses include residential uses, schools, hospitals, churches, daycare, and similar uses. All other uses must comply with the "Other Non -Residential" standard. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.10-2 August 2016 884 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.10 NOISE Table 5.10-1 Exterior Noise Limits Exterior Noise Standards Receiving Land Use Noise Standard Time Period Noise sensitive 60 dB(A) 50 dB(A) 7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m. 10:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m. Other nonresidential 75 dB(A) 65 dB(A) 7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m. 10:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m. Source: City of La Quinta Municipal Code, Section 9.100.210 The Municipal Code also establishes limits on construction activity during the day. Construction noise is considered temporary, but can often be disruptive for surrounding land uses. Section 6.08.050 of the Municipal Code limits construction to the following hours: October 1st through April 301h: Monday — Friday: 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Saturday: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Sunday and Holidays: None May 1st through September 301h: Monday — Friday: 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Saturday: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Sunday and Holidays: None In addition, the Municipal Code Section 9.100.220 states: "No use, except a temporary construction operation, shall be permitted which generates inherent and recurrent ground vibration perceptible, without instruments, at the boundary of the lot on which the use is located." Existing Noise Measurements in the General Plan Area The existing noise environment in the City was determined by both short-term and long-term noise level monitoring during the acoustical analysis completed for the 2035 General Plan update. One short-term and one long-term analysis point were located within the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan project area. Exhibit 5.10-1, Noise Measurement Locations, shows where short-term and 24- hour noise measurements were taken for the General Plan. Table 5.10-3, Existing Ambient Hourly and 24-Hour Noise Level Measurements In and Near the Village, shows receptor locations in the Village and in neighborhoods near the Village. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.10-3 August 2016 885 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.10 NOISE Table 5.10-2 Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments Land Uses CNEL (dBA) 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Residential --- Single Family Dwellings, Duplex, Mobile Homes A B C Residential— Multiple Family A B C Transient Lodging: Hotels and Motels g g' A B C D' School Classrooms, Libraries, Churches, Hospitals, Nursing Homes and Convalescent Hospitals A B C D' Auditoriums, Concert Halls, Amphitheaters B C Sports Arenas, Outdoor Spectator Sports B _ C Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks A Golf Courses, Riding Stables, Water Recreation, Cemeteries A C Office Buildings, Business, Commercial and Professional A B Industrial, Manufacturing, Utilities, Agriculture A B Source: California Department of Health Services, "Guidelines for the Preparation and Content of the Noise Element of the General Plan," 1990 A Normally Acceptable: With no special noise reduction requirements assuming standard construction. Conditionally Acceptable: New construction or development should be undertaken only after B a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirement is made and needed noise insulation features included in the design Normally Unacceptable: New construction is discouraged. If new construction does proceed, a C detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. Clearly Unacceptable: New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.10-4 August 2016 li a 1 2 41 Y IMM �- 6 Ys { 40 .►A jFf --------------------------------------- 1 I rr ------------------ -- tit 7. y C ,, )cation * �` m rs) ` ... )cation nutes) r ' Source: Esri, DigitalG�lobe, GeoEye, EartlhstarG�e-ographics CNE-/Airbus D USD , USG�S,AEy , t .,�� Y = -i� Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS Use Comm ity ATTACH M ENT 1 5.10 NOISE This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.10-6 August 2016 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.10 NOISE Table 5.10-3 Existing Ambient Hourly and 24-Hour Noise Level Measurements In and Near the Village Hourly Noise Daily Noise Time of Location Primary Noise Source Levels (Leq Levels (dBA Measurement dBA) CNEL) Next to the Crab Pot at the Traffic on Avenida La southwest corner of Avenida February2-3, Fonda and ambient 43.1-65.4 58.9 La Fonda and Desert Club Dr 2011 noise within the Village Source: Table 111-30, page 111-141, La Quinta General Plan 2035 EIR, 2013. A second ambient noise measurement was taken in the neighborhood along Avenida Bermudas, approximately 400 feet south of Avenue 52. This was a short term measurement taken at 11:12 am. The noise level was recorded as 66.2 Leq dBA and 71.3 dBA CNEL. Throughout the City, short-term noise levels ranged between 57.7 dBA Leq and 69.3 dBA Leq (61.5 dBA CNEL to 72.9 dBA CNEL). The ambient noise levels within the La Quinta Village were measured at 66.2 dBA Leq. During long-term analysis, measurements were monitored for a 24-hour period to assess ambient hourly noise levels. Throughout the City, the 24-hour noise levels ranged between 43.1 dBA Lea and 72.6 dBA Leq (58.9 dBA CNEL to 72.7 dBA CNEL). The 24-hour noise level taken within the La Quinta Village, measured between 43.1 and 65.4 dBA Leq (58.9 dBA CNEL). Data indicated that traffic peak hours generally resulted in the highest noise levels. Primary Noise Sources As discussed previously, existing ambient noise sources in La Quinta are generally associated with motor vehicle traffic. This includes truck traffic and noise generated from local buses. Other noise sources include air traffic generated from the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport and Bermuda Dunes Airport, noise from commercial and local business operations, including truck loading and operation of mechanical equipment, and construction noise, which impacts development in proximity to the construction activities and equipment. Each of these noise sources is discussed categorically below. Table 5.10-4, Existing Noise Exposure Adjacent to the Village, shows the available existing contours of the major roadways surrounding the project area, including Calle Tampico, Avenue 52, and Avenida Bermudas. These roads pass near sensitive land uses, such as residential neighborhoods and schools. Avenue 52 has noise levels exceeding 65 dBA CNEL at 100 feet from centerline. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.10-7 August 2016 -m ATTACH M ENT 1 5.10 NOISE Table 5.10-4 Existing Noise Exposure Adjacent to the Village Road Segment CNEL at Distance to Contour (Feet) from Centerline 100 Feet 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55dBA (dBA) CNEL CNEL CNEL CNEL Calle Tampico Between Eisenhower Dr. & 61.9 RW 62 134 289 Avenida Bermudas Calle Tampico Between Avenida Bermudas 64.7 RW 95 204 440 & Washington Street Avenue 52 w/o Washington St. 66.7 60 130 280 603 Avenida Between Calle Tampico & 58.5 RW RW 80 172 Bermudas Avenue 52 Source: La Quinta General Plan EIR, Table III-3Z Terra Nova, 2010. Ground -borne Vibration and Ground -borne Noise Levels Ground -borne vibration and noise are generally associated with construction activity, such as pile driving and grading, but are also generated from traffic. Vibration is defined as the periodic movement of mass over time, and is described in units of velocity (inches per second). It is discussed in decibel (dB) units in order to compress the range of numbers required to describe vibration. The human threshold of perception for vibration is 65 Vdb, or 0.0018 inches/second, and is not usually significant until 70 Vdb, or 0.0031 inches/second. Typical levels of ground vibration range between 50 Vdb and 100 Vdb. Vibration caused by bus and heavy truck traffic, for example, is generally around 65 Vdb. In comparison, construction related vibration can range between 90 Vdb and 100 Vdb. Ground -borne vibrations associated with construction and traffic attenuate rapidly as one moves away from the source. 5.10.3 Applicable Goals and Policies rnnl AI_ 9 A healthful noise environmental which complements the City's residential and resort character. Policy N-1.1. Noise standards in the City shall be consistent with the Community Noise and Land Use Compatibility scale describes in this section. Program N-1.1.b.: Ensure that City Building Code standards include interior noise level standards that are consistent with the Community Noise and Land Use Compatibility scale. Policy N-1.2. New residential development located adjacent to any roadway identified in Table IV-4 of the General Plan as having a build -out noise level in excess of 65 dBA shall continue to be required to submit a noise impact analysis in conjunction with the first Planning Division application, which demonstrates compliance with the City's noise standards. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.10-8 August 2016 :•0 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.10 NOISE Table 5.10-5 Build Out Noise Levels' Road Segment CNEL at 100 Feet (dBA) Distance to Contour (Feet) 70 dBA CNEL 65 dBA CNEL 60 dBA CNEL 55 dBA CNEL Washington St. between Avenue 50/Calle Tampico 70.9 115 248 534 1,150 Eisenhower Dr. between Washington St./Avenue 50 68.1 74 160 346 745 Eisenhower Dr. between Avenue 50/CalleTampico 66.6 59 128 275 593 Avenida Bermudas between Calle Tampico/Avenue 52 59.1 RW RW 87 188 Avenida Bermudas between Avenue 52/Calle Durango 63.6 RW 80 173 372 Calle Tampico between Eisenhower Dr./Avenida Bermudas 61.9 RW 62 134 289 Calle Tampico between Ave Bermudas/Washington St. 64.7 RW 95 204 440 Avenue 52 w/o Washington St. 66.7 60 130 280 603 Source: La Quinta General Plan 2035, annotated Table IV-4, 2013. Note: 1. Road Segments represent only those in and adjacent to the Village Commercial District. Policy N-1.3. New non-residential development located adjacent to existing residential development, sensitive receptors, or residentially designated land, shall be required to submit a noise impact analysis in conjunction with the first Planning Division application, which demonstrates that it will not significantly impact the adjacent residential development or residential land. Program N-1.3.a.: Provide accommodation for special events in the public interest, such as concerts and festivals, which may temporarily exceed the maximum allowable decibel level. Policy N-1.4 All Mixed Use projects shall be required to submit a noise impact analysis in conjunction with the first Planning Division application, which demonstrates compliance with the City's noise standards. Policy N-1.5 All noise impact analysis will include, at a minimum, short-term construction noise and noise generated by the daily operation of the project at build out. Policy N-1.6 The City may require remedial noise control plans and/or improvements for areas experiencing noise in excess of adopted City standards. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.10-9 August 2016 891 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.10 NOISE 5.10.4 Project Impacts Thresholds of Significance/Criteria for Determining Significance The CEQA Guidelines provide guidance for determining the significance of the environmental effects caused by a project. Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines provides a list of environmental factors that potentially may be affected by completion of a project. Implementation of the Village Build -Out Plan would have a significant effect on noise if it is determined the project: a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies; b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground -borne vibration or groundborne noise levels; c. Causes a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project; d. Causes a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project; e. If located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, a project would expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels; and f. If located within the vicinity of a private airstrip, a project would expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. a/c/d. Generation of noise levels in excess of established standards, and periodic and permanent increase in ambient noise levels The City of La Quinta currently regulates noise levels for sensitive land uses. The City uses the noise levels shown in Table 5.10-2, as a guideline to achieve long-term noise compatibility for land uses. For example, the maximum exterior noise level within residential areas is a CNEL of 65 dBA. Mitigation measures are required where residential uses will be exposed to noise levels greater than 65 dBA CNEL. Existing noise sources in the City are generally from motor vehicle traffic, however noise is also generated from commercial and local business operations, and construction noise. Traffic Noise Future noise contours for major roadways in La Quinta were analyzed in the La Quinta General Plan EIR, based on build out of the General Plan Update to help determine the extent of future noise impacts associated with implementation of the General Plan. Table 5.10-5, Year 2035 Build -out Conditions Noise Contours, shows the future noise contours for roadways in and adjacent to the project area that were analyzed in the La Quinta General Plan EIR. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.10-10 August 2016 :•. ATTACH M ENT 1 5.10 NOISE Table 5.10-6 Year 2035 Build -out Conditions Noise Contours CNEL Distance to Contour (Feet) from at 100 Centerline Road Segment 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55dBA Feet (dBA) CNEL CNEL CNEL CNEL Calle Tampico Between Eisenhower Drive/Avenida 61.9 RW 62 134 289 Bermudas Calle Tampico between Avenida Bermudas/ 64.7 RW 95 204 440 Washington Street Avenue 52 w/o Washington Street 66.7 60 130 280 603 Avenida Bermudas Between Calle Tampico/ Avenue 52 59.1 RW RW 87 188 Source: La Quinta General Plan EIR, Table 111-33, Terra Nova, 2010. The goal of the Village Build -out Plan is to create a walkable mixed -use community with less reliability on vehicles, but an increase in population could result in more automobiles, trucks, and to a lesser extent buses. Therefore, noise levels along roadways throughout the project area are expected to increase. However, because the City envisions the Village to become a more pedestrian friendly district, traffic may not increase significantly with an increase in density. As discussed in Section 5.9. Land Use and Section 5.14 Traffic and Circulation, the City will be adopting parking management strategies including the use of remote parking lots and shuttle service into the Village (Section 5.9) and implementing a number of traffic calming strategies along with increasing pedestrian, bicycle and golf cart access into and around the project area (Section 5.14), thus reducing the reliance on the motor vehicle for trips into and through the Village. The City will continue to monitor ambient noise levels as new projects are proposed. This would be achieved through implementation of General Plan Noise Policy N-1.3 that requires new non-residential development located adjacent to existing residential development, sensitive receptors, or residentially designated land be required to submit a noise impact analysis in conjunction with the first Planning Division application. Noise studies will be required to be conducted on a project -by -project basis through Mitigation Measure N0I-1. Recommendations in each noise study shall be designed to reduce noise impacts from non-residential development to less than significant levels. Noise from Non-residential Land Uses In addition to new residential development, implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will facilitate construction of new non-residential land uses. Additional non-residential uses are proposed to be developed at build -out within the project area. Due to the mixed -use characteristics of the Village, sensitive land uses may be located adjacent to commercial areas. All land uses are required to comply with exterior noise levels set forth in the City's Noise Ordinance and General Plan, however additional mitigation measures may be required to reduce impacts on sensitive uses. Therefore, implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would be required. In addition, some land uses will require deliveries of food, beverages, and other supplies that would arrive by truck. Mitigation Measure NOI-2 will require La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.10-11 August 2016 893 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.10 NOISE that all truck deliveries within the Village be limited to daylight hours. These measures will reduce noise impacts from non-residential development to less than significant levels. Construction Noise Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan is expected to increase the amount of construction related noises associated with proposed new development and redevelopment. The Build -out Plan includes development of an additional 1,230 dwelling units, and up to an additional 799,786 square feet of non-residential land use. Increased construction noise has the potential to periodically increase ambient noise levels in excess of noise standards set by the City's Noise Ordinance. The Municipal Code establishes base ambient noise level limits based on the time of day, as shown in Table 5.10-2. In addition, construction activity is limited during established days and hours to reduce disruption on surrounding land uses. Future construction within the Village Build -out Plan project area will be required to follow these standards, and as a result, will have a less than significant impact. b. Generation of ground -borne vibration levels in excess of established standards New development throughout the project area will require grading, trenching and other activities that may produce increased ground -borne vibration and noise. Construction noise is generally short term and may be mitigated to acceptable levels by a variety of measures, including equipping construction equipment with mufflers, locating stationary equipment away from noise sensitive receptors and placing equipment staging areas as far from sensitive receptors as is practicable. In addition, construction activity is required to abide by noise standards set by the Noise Ordinance. More specifically, according to the City of La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.100.220.F, no use except a temporary construction operation shall be permitted which generates inherent and recurrent ground vibration perceptible, without instruments, at the boundary of the lot on which the use is located. Project -specific mitigation for groundborne vibration will be outlined in noise studies required by Mitigation Measure NOI-1. Mitigation for each project will cumulatively assist in reducing noise impacts due to groundborne vibration within the project area to less than significant. Groundborne vibration may affect sensitive receptors due to an increase in large vehicle traffic, like buses and trucks. There are no designated truck routes near the project area, but commercial properties may receive deliveries from large trucks. With implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-2, impacts due to groundborne vibration from large trucks will be less than significant. There are existing bus routes near the project area, which were included in the noise analysis for the General Plan. New routes may develop, especially to aide in reducing the reliance on vehicles in the project area. If a new route is proposed within the Build -out Plan area, the City will be required to evaluate noise impacts and implement any necessary mitigation in order to reduce impacts to less than significant levels. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.10-12 August 2016 894 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.10 NOISE e. Excessive noise levels due to airport The Village Build -out Plan project area is not located within the airport land use plans for either the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport or the Bermuda Dunes Airport. Therefore, there would be no impacts associated with proximity to an airport. f. Excessive noise levels due to air strip There are no private airstrips in the area. Therefore, there would be no impacts associated with proximity to a private air strip. 5.10.5 Mitigation Measures N0I-1 Based on a project's proximity to sensitive receptors, City Staff will determine if a Noise Impact Analysis is needed on a project -by -project basis during their review of project applications. If required, the study shall analyze noise levels within the proposed project, and include mitigation measures to assure that the modeled interior and exterior noise levels meet the City's standards. N0I-2 Truck deliveries to businesses in the project area that are adjacent to sensitive land uses shall be limited to daylight hours. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting A. The Planning Division is responsible for reviewing each project the is proposed within the Build -out Plan project area to determine whether a noise impact analysis is necessary, based on land use type and proximity to sensitive receptors. Responsible Parties: Planning Division. B. The city building official shall have the responsibility and authority to enforce the provisions of Section 6.08.050 of the Municipal Code during project construction. Responsible Parties: Building Official 5.10.6 Level of Significance After Mitigation With the implementation of Mitigation Measures NOI-1 and NOI-2, and compliance with the noise standards set forth in the General Plan and Municipal Code, noise impacts within the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area will be less than significant. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.10-13 August 2016 895 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.10 NOISE This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.10-14 August 2016 :•. ATTACH M ENT 1 5.11 POPULATION AND HOUSING 5.11 Population and Housing 5.11.1 Introduction This section describes the existing setting regarding population and housing and the potential effects associated with implementation of the proposed Village Build -out Plan. Descriptions and analysis in this section are based on population and housing information provided by the California Department of Finance (DOF), Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and the City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan. Sources used in the preparation are included in Chapter 9, References. 5.11.2 Existing Conditions Population Between 1990 and 2000, the City of La Quinta experienced a 111.3 percent population increase; and between 2000 and 2010, a 58.1 percent increase. The average rate of growth between 1990 and 2000 was 1,248 people per year, and from 2000 to 2010, approximately 1,423 people per year. The Department of Finance 2015 Population Report estimates a total population of 39,964 people in the City of La Quinta. The Village Build -out Plan project area is currently a small-scale commercial core with some single - and multi -family uses, in the southern portion of the City near the La Quinta Cove. The City plans to continue development in the project area and create a livable and sustainable neighborhood that is compact, interconnected, and can sustain a mix of land uses. The General Plan land use designation of Village Commercial allows for and encourages mixed -use opportunities within the project area. Existing Housing Table 5.11-1, Total Households, 2000 to 2010, shows the increase in dwelling units between 2000 and 2010. In 2000, La Quinta had 11,812 housing units. By 2010, this number had increased to 23,489 housing units. This represents a 98.9 percent increase. Table 5.11-1 Total Households, 2000 to 2010 Jurisdiction 2000 2010 # Increase % Increase County of Riverside 506,218 686,260 180,042 35.6 City of La Quinta 8,445 14,820 6,375 75.5 Source: La Quinta General Plan 2035, Table 11-11. There are three basic types of housing units for which data is presented in Table 5.11-2, Total Dwelling Units by Type of Structure, 2000 to 2010: single family units, which include both detached and La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.11-1 August 2016 897 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.11 POPULATION AND HOUSING attached units; multifamily units, which include apartments, duplexes, triplexes and fourplexes; and mobile homes. The predominant type of dwelling unit in the City of La Quinta continues to be single family. Together, detached and attached single-family homes comprised 89.0 percent of all units in the City. The number of multi -family units in the City more than tripled from 2000 to 2010, although multi- family units only represent 10 percent of the total housing stock. Table 5.11-2 Total Dwelling Units by Type of Structure, 2000-2010 Building Type 2000 2010 Change 2000-2010 Units % of Total Units % of Total % # Single -Family 10,788 91.3 21,009 89.0 +94.7 +10,221 Multifamily 765 6.5 2,345 10.0 +206.5 +1,580 Mobile Homes 1 259 2.2 231 1.0 -10.8 -28 Total Dwelling Units 11,812 100.0 23,585 100.0 +99.7 +11,733 Source: 2035 La Quinta General Plan, 2014-2021 Housing Element, Table 11-12. As shown in Table 5.11-3, Housing Tenure and Vacancy, 2010, shows the housing by tenure in the City of La Quinta. In 2010, ownership units accounted for about 75.2 percent of occupied housing in La Quinta which is a 6.3 percent decrease from the 2000 Census. The rental occupied housing units represent 24.8 percent of the occupied housing within the City, which is a 6.3 percent increase in rental properties from the 2000 Census. Table 5.11-3 Household Tenure and Vacancy, 2010 Tenure 2010 Percentage Total Units Total Units 23,489 100.0 Occupied 14,820 63.1 Vacant 8,669 36.9 Ownership Units Total Ownership Units 12,022 100.0 Occupied 11,152 92.8 Vacant 870 7.2 Rental Units Total Rental Units 4,458 100.0 Occupied 3,668 82.3 Vacant 790 17.7 Seasonal/Other Units Total Seasonal Recreational Use 6,448 - - Rented or Sold, not occupied 1 141 - Other Vacant 561 -- Source: La Quinta General Plan 2035 and the 2014-2021 Housing Element, Table 11-16. La Quinta is a popular destination for seasonal residents due to the comfortable, mild winters. The seasonal or part-time resident population is not included in the population estimates compiled by the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.11-2 August 2016 • :, ATTACH M ENT 1 5.11 POPULATION AND HOUSING Census Bureau because people are classified according to the location of their primary residence. The State Department of Finance provides a yearly estimate of total built housing units and an estimate of the number of vacant units. In resort communities like La Quinta, the number of vacant units reflects the number of units that are not occupied year-round, as well as those that are ready for year round occupancy that have not yet been inhabited. According to the 2010 Census, the overall vacancy rate for La Quinta is 36.9 percent, while the seasonal vacancy rate is 27.5 percent. Regional Housing Assessment Needs SCAG is responsible for identifying future housing needs in each jurisdiction, including the City of La Quinta. To meet this mandate, SCAG develops the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) to establish the projected need for housing and the fair share distribution of the projected need. A local jurisdiction's "fair share" of regional housing need is the number of additional housing units that will need to be constructed to accommodate the forecast growth, to replace expected demolitions and conversion of housing units to non -housing uses, and to achieve a vacancy rate that allows for healthy functioning of the housing market. The allocation is divided into four income categories: Very Low, Low, Moderate, and Above Moderate. The allocation is further adjusted to avoid an over - concentration of lower -income households in anyone jurisdiction. Cities must also plan for the needs of extremely low-income households, which is assumed to be 50 percent of the allocation for Very Low-income units. Table 5.11-4, Regional Housing Needs Assessment, 2014-2021, shows the RHNA for the City of La Quinta. As presented in this table, the City must be able to accommodate 364 units, representing a 1.5 percent increase in the number of households in the City. Table 5.11-4 Regional Housing Needs Assessment, 2014-2021 Household Income Levels Income as a Percent of County Median RHNA Allocation Percent Very Low Less than 50% 91 25.0 Low 51%-80% 61 17.1 Moderate 81%-120% 66 18.2 Above -Moderate Over 120% 146 39.7 Total 1 364 100 Source: La Quinta General Plan 2035 and 2014-2021 Housing Element, Table 11-30. 5.11.3 Applicable Goals and Policies City of La Quinta GOAL H-1 Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.11-3 August 2016 I. We ATTACH M ENT 1 5.11 POPULATION AND HOUSING Policy H-1.1 Identify adequate sites to accommodate a range of product types, densities, and prices to address the housing needs of all household types, lifestyles, and income levels. Policy H-1.2 Focus housing growth within existing City boundaries until it is necessary to pursue annexation or development in planning areas for affordable housing. Policy H-1.3 Direct new housing development to viable areas where essential public facilities can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are available. r;nAl 14-2 Assist in the creation and provision of resources to support housing for lower and moderate -income households. Policy H-2.1 Increase housing choices for lower and moderate -income households. Policy H-2.2 Support public, private, and nonprofit efforts in the development of affordable housing. Policy H-2.3 Pursue a variety of forms of private, local, state, and federal assistance to support development of affordable housing. GOAL H-3 Create a regulatory system that does not unduly constrain the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing affordable to all La Quinta residents. Policy H-3.3 Incentivize the development of affordable housing to facilitate the development of housing for the City's lower and moderate income households. Program H-3.3.b: Reduced Parking Standards - There are several potential opportunities to reduce parking standards for special types of development in La Quinta. While the City already has special parking standards for multifamily senior housing, there is potential to further reduce those requirements, particularly for lower and moderate -income senior housing. The compact, mixed -use character of the Village area may also foster opportunities for parking reductions or joint -use opportunities. Lower and moderate -income households may own fewer vehicles than above moderate -income households, and be more inclined to walk or use public transportation. Incentives such as reduced parking requirements could be offered for affordable housing developments. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.11-4 August 2016 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.11 POPULATION AND HOUSING • Objective: Study the potential impacts of adopting reduced parking requirements or shared parking standards for senior housing and housing in the Village, particularly for projects serving lower and moderate income households. • Timing: Zoning Ordinance Update 2014 • Funding Source: General Fund • Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department Program H-3.3.c: Encourage Lot Consolidation - Several small lots in the Village Commercial would have improved development potential through lot consolidation. The City will study, identify, and adopt regulatory incentives to encourage and facilitate lot consolidation. Potential incentives include fee deferral or reductions, parking requirement reduction, and relief from various other development standards that could potentially increase the cost of the project. • Objective: Identify opportunities and adopt incentives for lot consolidation in the Village Commercial zone • Timing: July 1, 2015 • Funding Source: General Fund • Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department Southern California Association of Governments Sustainable Communities Strategy SCAG provided the City of La Quinta with a letter in response to the Notice of Preparation of the Draft EIR in November 2015. Comments from SCAG were related to the projects consistency with SCAGs 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan -Sustainable Communities Strategy document (RTP/SCS), and how to evaluate the project. However, since then, SCAG has adopted the 2016-2040, RTP/SCS (April 2016) with an updated set of Goals and Guiding Policies. It is the April 2016 RTP/SCS that was used to evaluate the project. SB 375, the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008, requires metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) such as SCAG to develop a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) — an element of the RTP —to strive to reach the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target established for each region by the California Air Resources Board. SCAG's 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy is a plan for mobility, accessibility, sustainability and a high quality of life in the region. It is first and foremost, a transportation plan that integrates land use planning into its framework to improve mobility and access to transportation options in response to S13375. A natural segue from this concept is the idea that compact, walkable neighborhoods similar to that proposed in the Village Build -out Plan. The RTC/SCS was adopted in April 2016 and is available at the following web address: http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/draft/d2016RTPSCS.pdf La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.11-5 August 2016 901 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.11 POPULATION AND HOUSING The Goals and Guiding Policies set forth in the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS are listed here. Most of these can be adapted and implemented at the local level by the City of La Quinta such as maximizing mobility and accessibility for all people and goods. This is being achieved by the City's commitment to good roads where intersections can accommodate round-abouts instead of 4-way stops or traffic signals where vehicles stop and idle. 2016 RTP/SCS Goals 1. Align the plan investments and policies with improving regional economic development and competitiveness. 2. Maximize mobility and accessibility for all people and goods in the region. 3. Ensure travel safety and reliability for all people and goods in the region. 4. Preserve and ensure a sustainable regional transportation system. 5. Maximize the productivity of our transportation system. 6. Protect the environment and health of our residents by improving air quality and encouraging active transportation (e.g., bicycling and walking). 7. Actively encourage and create incentives for energy efficiency, where possible. 8. Encourage land use and growth patterns that facilitate transit and active transportation. 9. Maximize the security of the regional transportation system through improved system monitoring, rapid recovery planning, and coordination with other security agencies. Note: SCAG does not yet have an agreed -upon security performance measure. 2016 RTP-SCS Guiding Policies 1. Transportation investments shall be based on SCAG's adopted regional Performance Indicators. 2. Ensuring safety, adequate maintenance and efficiency of operations on the existing multimodal transportation system should be the highest RTP/SCS priorities for any incremental funding in the region. 3. RTP/SCS land use and growth strategies in the RTP/SCS will respect local input and advance smart growth initiatives. 4. Transportation demand management (TDM) and active transportation will be focus areas, subject to Policy 1. 5. HOV gap closures that significantly increase transit and rideshare usage will be supported and encouraged, subject to Policy 1. 6. The RTP/SCS will support investments and strategies to reduce non -recurrent congestion and demand for single occupancy vehicle use, by leveraging advanced technologies. 7. The RTP/SCS will encourage transportation investments that result in cleaner air, a better environment, a more efficient transportation system and sustainable outcomes in the long run. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.11-6 August 2016 902 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.11 POPULATION AND HOUSING 8. Monitoring progress on all aspects of the Plan, including the timely implementation of projects, programs, and strategies, will be an important and integral component of the Plan. 5.11.4 Project Impact Analysis Thresholds of Significance The following thresholds are derived from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, and are used to determine the level of potential effect. The significance determination is based on the recommended criteria set forth in Section 15064 of the CEQA Guidelines. Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan would have a significant effect on population and housing if it is determined that the project will: a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure). b. Displace substantial number of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere; or c. Displace substantial number of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. There is no standard methodology set forth in CEQA to assess the population and housing impacts of a proposed project. However, CEQA Section 15064(e) does offer guidance for the assessment of socio-economic impacts: Economic and social changes resulting from a project shall not be treated as significant effects on the environment. Economic or social changes may be used, however, to determine that a physical change shall be regarded as a significant effect on the environment. Where a physical change is caused by economic or social effects of a project, the physical change may be regarded as a significant effect in the some manner as any other physical change resulting from the project. Alternatively, economic and social effects of a physical change may be used to determine that the physical change is a significant effect on the environment. If the physical change causes adverse economic or social effects on people, those adverse effects may be used as a factor in determining whether the physical change is significant. For example, if a project would cause overcrowding of a public facility and the overcrowding causes an adverse effect on people, the overcrowding would be regarded as a significant effect. Impacts on population and housing were assessed by reviewing existing and anticipated population and housing figures provided by the DOF, SCAG, and the City of La Quinta Housing Element. The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.11-7 August 2016 903 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.11 POPULATION AND HOUSING proposed Build -out Plan's impacts were evaluated by determining their consistency with these estimates and projections. a. Population Growth There are two types of population growth: direct and indirect. Direct population growth occurs from the development of new residential units. Indirect population growth occurs from the creation of new employment opportunities or the removal of a barrier to growth such as adopting a Build -out Plan that would allow an increase in density in the Village. The Village Build -out Plan has the potential to induce both direct and indirect population growth within the project area by identifying 50.9 acres of residential development that could result in up to 1,230 new residential units (multi -family), and approximately 799,786 additional square feet of commercial, totaling 960,711 square feet of commercial space at build -out. Using the City of La Quinta's 2015 average household size of 2.60, the Build -out Plan would have the potential to add an estimated 3,198 new residents to the City's population through the development of new dwelling units. This represents approximately 5.5 percent of the build -out population within City limits anticipated by the 2035 General Plan. However, like the City itself, a number of the new residential units would likely be owned or otherwise occupied by seasonal residents, rather than permanent residents so the population growth associated with the Village Build -out Plan would be less than estimated. The Village Build -out Plan will provide a sustainable, downtown village community with mixed -use residential/commercial properties. The proposed housing within the project area would primarily consist of high density multi -family dwelling units either built above commercial/retail development or adjacent to it. According to SCAG's draft 2016 Growth Forecast, it is projected that by 2035 La Quinta's permanent population will be 46,297 people, with 17,948 occupied dwelling units within the City. The projections assume an annual growth rate of approximately 0.85 percent and do not account for seasonal, recreational, and occasional occupancy. Population projections used for the 2035 La Quinta General Plan are about twenty percent higher than the SCAG forecast to account for the high rate of seasonal/occasional residential occupancy. Therefore, for the purposes of this analysis, the General Plan projections were used to estimate a 2035 population of 57,969 in the City and with an additional 22,912 dwelling units added. Assuming the La Quinta Village is built -out by 2035, the area will include 5.4 percent of the City's projected dwelling units and 5.5 percent of the City's projected population. Anticipated population growth within the Village is consistent with 2035 General Plan goals and policies. Currently, 88.1 percent of the housing in the City of La Quinta consists of single-family dwelling units. Mixed -use development, as a permitted land use under the Village Commercial designation, would support General Plan Goal H-1 by creating new multi -family dwelling units within the City, diversifying housing opportunities. The multi -family dwelling units anticipated to be developed within the project area would also assist in focusing high density residential development La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.11-8 August 2016 904 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.11 POPULATION AND HOUSING to the project area, thereby decreasing an otherwise outward spread of urban sprawl to the City's Planning Area and Sphere. Also, the location of the project area offers future residents close access to public facilities, parks, and commercial development. The development of new multi -family housing within the project area is consistent with General Plan Goal H-2 accommodate residents of multiple income categories, which would include: low income, moderate income, market -level, and senior housing. As discussed in the La Quinta General Plan EIR, the City's build out population under the 2035 General Plan is reduced compared to the 2002 General Plan. Although the 2035 General Plan has the potential to increase population and housing development within city limits, it, along with the Village Build -out Plan are not expected to result in significant growth inducing impacts. However, this is considered to be a less than significant impact as the project area is an existing underdeveloped City core that benefits from existing utility infrastructure, public services such as the Civic Center, Community Park, Museum, and Library, and a thriving commercial area. Drawing additional residential and non- residential uses to the project area would meet the City's goals to provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population (Goal H-1); identify adequate sites to accommodate a range of product types, densities, and prices to address the housing needs of all household types, lifestyles, and income levels (Policy H-1.1); focus housing growth within existing City boundaries until it is necessary to pursue annexation or development in planning areas for affordable housing (Policy H.1-2); and direct new housing development to viable areas where essential public facilities can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are available (Policy H-1.3). Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan would also provide flexibility in meeting the City's intent to facilitate the creation and provision of resources to support housing for lower and moderate - income households (GOAL H-2), by increasing housing choices for lower and moderate -income households (Policy H-2.1); supporting public, private, and nonprofit efforts in the development of affordable housing (Policy H-2.2); and pursuing a variety of forms of private, local, State, and federal assistance to support development of affordable housing (Policy H-2.3). Finally, with regard to General Plan Goal H-3 to create a regulatory system that does not unduly constrain the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing affordable to all La Quinta residents, the City has identified programs to encourage achievement of this goal through the consideration of reduced parking standards for special types of development in the City, especially in the Village (ProgramH-3.3.b); and encourage lot consolidation with the project area to improve the development potential of lots in the project area (Program H-3.3.c). Reduced parking standards and the development of parking management strategies are discussed further in Section 5.9, Land Use. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.11-9 August 2016 905 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.11 POPULATION AND HOUSING SCAG's RTP/SCS The RTP/SCS considers new patterns of development as the regional economy continues to recover and grow, the composition of our population changes, the housing market responds to evolving needs, and demands and mobility innovations emerge. The Plan also includes a long-term strategic vision for the region that will help guide decisions for transportation and how we use land, as well as the public investments in both, through 2040. According to the RTP/SCS (page 50), planning for the future includes facing challenges, including the convergence of interests between two distinct population groups—millennials, who today range in age from 20 to 35, and aging baby boomers, who range in age from 51 to 70. Millennials represent 22.4 percent of the region's total population and rely less on automobiles than have previous generations; they are less apt to acquire driver's licenses, drive fewer miles and conduct fewer overall trips. SCAG's research also shows that millennials often prefer to live in denser, mixed -use urban areas well served by transit, rather than decentralized suburban areas. This trend has resulted in an increasing demand for new multifamily housing. Millennials also are more likely than other groups to embrace a range of mobility options, including shared cars, biking, transit and walking. These evolving preferences for transportation and housing are significant because Millennials will account for a large part of Southern California's overall population in 2040. In the near term, their housing and transportation preferences, when combined with the needs of baby boomers to maintain their independence, and who are also downsizing and looking for housing options, could significantly change how Southern California develops. The proposed Village Build -out Plan is right in line with the intent of the RTP/SCS goals and guiding policies regarding the creation of opportunities to increase densities of both residential and non- residential uses, to accommodate millennials seeking denser, mixed use urban areas and baby boomers downsizing and looking for opportunities to remain independent as they age by reducing the need to drive for goods and services. b. Displace existing housing The Village Build -out Plan does not include the demolition or conversion of existing residential dwelling units to non-residential uses. New development will be held to the vacant lots or underutilized properties dispersed throughout the project area. The Build -out Plan aims to increase housing density in the area to support a walkable community with close access to retail and entertainment. The Build -out Plan will have no impact on existing housing in the Village. C. Displace existing population The La Quinta Village Build -out Plan does not include the displacement of any residents within the project area. The goal of the plan is to utilize vacant lots and redevelop underutilized areas to increase La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.11-10 August 2016 IT ATTACH M ENT 1 5.11 POPULATION AND HOUSING housing, retail, commercial, and open space in the Village. There will be no impact to the current population in the Village, and the population will increase as vacant properties are developed over time. 5.11.5 Cumulative Impacts Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will not create cumulative impacts in regard to population and housing. Although having the potential to induce population growth, the project's adherence to goals, policies and programs as identified in the Goals and Policies section above, will provide sufficient housing to accommodate expanded growth within the Village and will assist in minimizing cumulative impacts to population and housing generally associated with new development as the project area is within the City's existing Village Commercial District that is already developed with a mix of residential and non-residential land uses. Therefore, the proposed Village Build -out Plan would not contribute to a cumulative impact on housing and population. With regard to SCAG's Regional Transportation Plan -Sustainable Communities Strategies, the successful implementation of the Village Build -out Plan would be in line with many of the goals and guiding policies, by creating a neighborhood of residential and non-residential uses where residents can live, work and play without getting into a motor vehicle, and where visitors can park and walk or bike through the Village. The SCAG goals that can be applied to the Village Build -out Plan are repeated here but revised to specifically show how the Village Build -out Plan addresses them. Some goals are truly regional and do not translate at the local level, and these have not been repeated here. RTP/SCS Goals 2. Maximize mobility and accessibility for all people and goods in the City. The City can achieve this goal with the Village Build -out Plan by having flexible zoning districts where a mix of uses are allowed either by right or by Conditional Use Permit (CUP), and by making road improvements to increase pedestrian/bicycle access and safety, and by replacing intersection stop controls with roundabouts that allow the continuous flow of traffic. 3. Ensure travel safety and reliability for all people and goods in the City. By making the road improvements identified in this EIR, this goal can be achieved in the Village. (see Exhibit 3-8 in Chapter 3, Project Description, and evaluated in Section 5.14, Traffic and Circulation). 6. Protect the environment and health of our residents by improving air quality and encouraging active transportation (e.g., bicycling and walking). (see explanation in the previous bullet) 7. Actively encourage and create incentives for energy efficiency, where possible. This is achieved through the City's commitment to reducing energy usage through implementation of mitigation measures in Section 5.2, Air Quality that include the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.11-11 August 2016 •IA ATTACH M ENT 1 5.11 POPULATION AND HOUSING requirement that development projects exceed the energy standards set forth in the California Building Code Energy Efficiency Standards, require low -flow water fixtures in all new projects, and require installation of ENERGY STAR compliant appliances. 8. Encourage land use and growth patterns that facilitate transit and active transportation. The intent of the Village Build -out Plan is to encourage such growth in the City's traditional downtown core — the Village, in order to create a sustainable community where residents and visitors do not have to depend on motor vehicles as transportation; where pedestrian and bicycle improvements are being made that allow the safe travel paths throughout the Village, and where SunLine can increase its presence in the area as demand to visit the Village grows. RTC/SCS Guiding Policies 3. RTP/SCS land use and growth strategies in the RTP/SCS will respect local input and advance smart growth initiatives. SCAG encourages cities to adopt local strategies for meeting the intent of SB 375 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. By implementing the Village Build -out Plan, the City of La Quinta intends to reduce dependence on motor vehicles, and require energy efficient residential and non-residential uses to be developed, thus reducing these emissions. 4. Transportation demand management (TDM) and active transportation will be focus areas, subject to SCAG's adopted regional performance indicators. Locally, the City of La Quinta is adopting TDM and active transportation strategies (see discussion in Chapter 3, Project Description, beginning on page 3-23, and also in Section 5.14, Traffic and Circulation, beginning on page 5.14-77). 7. The RTP/SCS will encourage transportation investments that result in cleaner air, a better environment, a more efficient transportation system and sustainable outcomes in the long run. The Village Build -out Plan is consistent with these guiding policies by creating safe pedestrian and cycling infrastructure (new sidewalks and bike lanes), allowing electric vehicles (golf carts) to also use the bike lanes, and increasing the number of roundabouts in the Village to eliminate 4-way stop controlled intersection (either stop signs or traffic signals). It is the City's intent to maximize the use of roundabouts, bike lanes, and enhanced sidewalks (wider) to reduce vehicle trips and thus reduce greenhouse gas emissions. 5.11.6 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures will be required as a result of project implementation as the Village Build -out Plan will create new housing opportunities as well as opportunities for millennials and baby boomers to live in an urban area where they do not need to depend on motor vehicles to access goods and services, and there are places to work and play. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.11-12 August 2016 •I: ATTACH M ENT 1 5.11 POPULATION AND HOUSING Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting A. No mitigation measures have been identified 5.11.7 Level of Significance after Mitigation Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will meet the City's General Plan goals by providing a balanced and varied economic base while also providing housing for a variety of people with varying needs. The project would not displace existing residences or residents, and will create an additional 1,230 new residences in a sustainable mixed use neighborhood. Therefore, there would be no significant impact to Population and Housing. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.11-13 August 2016 l ATTACH M ENT 1 5.11 POPULATION AND HOUSING This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.11-14 August 2016 910 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.12 PUBLIC SERVICES 5.12 Public Services 5.12.1 Introduction Current Public Services in the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan project area are described in this section. This section also includes a discussion of the potential constraints, risks and opportunities associated with these existing conditions. Potential impacts associated with implementation of the proposed Village Build -Out Plan are also considered, and mitigation measures set forth to reduce impacts. In order to research and assess these impacts, a variety of resources have been consulted, including personal communication with service providers and other sources. Sources for the preparation of the section are listed in Chapter 9, References. Service Providers There are a wide range of public services and facilities serving the project area. These include: • Public Schools: Desert Sands Unified School District, Coachella Valley Unified School District • Library Services: Riverside County Library System • Law Enforcement: La Quinta Police Department/Riverside County Sheriff's Department • Fire Protection: La Quinta Fire Department • Electricity: Imperial Irrigation District • Natural Gas: The Gas Company • Domestic Water: Coachella Valley Water District • Wastewater Collection/Treatment: Coachella Valley Water District • Solid Waste Management: Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, LLC 5.12.2 Existing Conditions Fire Protection Fire protection is provided through a contract with the Riverside County Fire Department, which serves both the City and the Sphere of Influence areas. There are three City -owned fire stations, each staffed with full-time paid and volunteer firefighters, and equipped as listed below: Fire Station No. 32 at 78-111 Avenue 52; equipment includes a primary and reserve fire engines, and volunteer squad and rescue vehicles. This station is located adjacent to the south end of the project area at the southwest corner of Avenue 52 and Desert Club Drive. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.12-1 August 2016 911 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.12 PUBLIC SERVICES Fire Station No. 70 at 54-001 Madison Street; equipped with a primary engine, a brush fire engine, and a volunteer squad vehicle. This station is located approximately 3.14 miles southeast of the project area at the southwest corner of Avenue 54 and Madison Street. Fire Station No.93 at 44-555 Adams Street; equipped with a primary engine and a reserve engine. This station is located approximately 3.32 miles north of the project area. Emergency response to the City is also available through Riverside County Fire Department stations in other cities. These include Station No. 55, located in Indian Wells; Station No. 88, in Indio; and Station No. 39, located at the Jacqueline Cochran Airport, east of the City's eastern Sphere of Influence. County Fire dispatches all calls through its centralized Emergency Command Center, where responding stations are determined based on location and need. Average Fire Department response times are between 5 and 7 minutes. La Quinta has an Insurance Service Office (ISO) rate of 4, based on a scale of 1 through 10, with 1 being the highest rating. Ratings are reviewed periodically. A variety of criteria are used to determine the ISO rating, such as staffing levels, response times, safety history and building code standards. The County Fire Department cites thresholds established in its 1986 Master Plan, which call for one new fire station per every 2,000 dwelling units or 3.5 million square feet of commercial development. The Fire Department has developed a Strategic Plan to update thresholds and plan for staffing, facilities and services through 2029. Goals and strategies include developing a "standard of cover" analysis to establish appropriate staffing levels to meet operational needs within the various jurisdictions the Department serves. Emergency Medical Response The Fire Department responds to emergency medical incidents and provides Basic and Advanced Life Support via its paramedic assessment engines. The County contracts for the provision of ambulance transportation services across the region, including the City, via exclusive operation areas. Currently, American Medical Response (AMR) is the awarded contractor. AMR is a private company, which operates a fleet of ambulances serving the City and region. AMR is connected to the County's dispatch system and responds in conjunction with Fire Department personnel. Police Protection The City contracts annually with the County of Riverside for police staffing. In 2010-2011, the City's contract provided for the equivalent of 51 sworn officers and 5 community service officers. City - assigned officers conduct investigations, manage traffic control, and provide general patrol duties. Patrol division staff is augmented by a Special Enforcement Team, which provides investigative services and support for prevention activities in the community. Community programs include the School Resource Officer program at local schools; the Junior Cadet program; a Crime Stoppers La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.12-2 August 2016 912 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.12 PUBLIC SERVICES program; the volunteer Citizens on Patrol Program; and Community Service Officers. The latter, which are assigned to each division, serve as community liaisons and are responsible for coordinating Community Programs such as Neighborhood Watch. There are two Police Department offices in the City: the Civic Center Community Policing Office located at 78-495 Calle Tampico and the La Quinta Police Station, which is operated by the Riverside County Sheriff's Department, located at 86-625 Airport Boulevard. The City's 2015 contract with the Sheriff's Department provides for the equivalent of 51 sworn officers and 5 community service officers. The Riverside County Sheriff's Department maintains a staffing level of one staff per 1,000 population. The City has no established staffing ratio, and police staffing in La Quinta is based on the safety needs of the local community and the available resources to provide these safety needs. Based on the City's 2010 full occupancy population of 59,247, the current level of police staffing is approximately 1.06 staff per 1,000 population. Schools (Desert Sands Unified School District) There are two school districts providing public education to students in kindergarten through 12th grade in La Quinta: Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) and Coachella Valley Unified School District (CVUSD). DSUSD will provide school services to the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan area and is discussed below. The project area will be served by DSUSD which operates 19 elementary schools, eight middle schools, and seven high schools. Table 5.12-1 Desert Sands Unified School District Enrollment and Capacity School Type 2013/14 Capacity 2013/14 Enrollment Existing Capacity Surplus/(Deficit) Elementary School (Grades K-5) 13,730 12,940 790 Middle School (Grades 6-8) 7,530 6,802 728 High School (Grades 9-12) 10,291 9,520 771 otal 31,551 29,262 2,289 Source: Desert Sands Unified School District, Fee Justification Report Table ll, 2014. Although the District as a whole still has capacity for new students, current enrollment at the La Quinta High School exceeds design capacity. DSUSD utilizes portable classrooms to accommodate over -capacity student enrollment at its schools until enrollment warrants construction of new school facilities. DSUSD's newest high school is the Shadow Hills High School located in the City of Indio, north of the 1-10 freeway at the southwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 39. Shadow Hills is expected to gradually absorb some of the excess student population currently served by La Quinta High School. In 2014, Shadow Hills had an enrollment level between 900 and 1,000 students. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.12-3 August 2016 913 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.12 PUBLIC SERVICES In general, DSUSD student populations have remained stable or declined slightly as a result of recession -related impacts on local development. DSUSD staff has indicated it expects that no new school facilities will be required in the short term (2 to 4 years). However, they continue to plan for expansion. Although there are few if any sites available for new DSUSD school facilities within La Quinta, DSUSD has identified future school site properties near the Shadow Hills campus in the City of Indio and also in the City of Coachella. DSUSD recently announced the closure of John Adams Elementary School located adjacent to the northerly boundary of the project area. However, the school will remain a DSUSD property as it was recently announced that the school would be used for pre -kindergarten children. DSUSD also provides adult education programs, such as GED test preparation, citizenship classes and English as a Second Language. DSUSD also offers early childhood education, special education services, and after -school programs. DSUSD's Alternative school provides independent learning and home schooling support for students in grades kindergarten through 12tn grade. School Funding There are a variety of funding sources for school districts, including a portion of local property taxes as well as State funds. In addition, State Assembly Bill 2926 (AB 2926), enacted in 1986 authorizes school districts to levy an impact fee on developers. These fees may be used to construct new facilities. They are updated periodically and currently (July 2016) DSUSD fees are $3.36 per square foot of new residential development and $0.56 per square foot of commercial development. Higher Education Institutions There are three regional higher education institutions in the Coachella Valley. They include the College of the Desert, a community college with Associates degree programs and adult education, with multiple campuses, including the main campus in Palm Desert. Bachelor's and Master's degree programs are offered through California State University, San Bernardino ( Palm Desert campus) and University of California, Riverside (Palm Desert campus). Parks See Section 5-15, Recreation. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.12-4 August 2016 914 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.12 PUBLIC SERVICES Public Facilities Libraries The La Quinta Library is located at 78-275 Calle Tampico and within the Village Build -out Plan. The City owns the library facility, which is operated by Riverside County. According to the City's General Plan, the Library contains 89,060 volumes within a 20,000 square foot space. Although the City has not established a standard for library facilities, the County Library system aims for an un-adopted standard of two volumes per capita. Based on this standard, existing library facilities are sufficient to serve the current population. 5.12.3 Applicable Goals and Policies (;nnl FS-1 An effective and comprehensive response to all emergency service needs. Policy ES-1.2 New development proposals shall continue to be routed to the Fire Department to assure that project access and design provide for maximum fire and life safety. Policy ES-1.6 New development proposals shall continue to be routed to the Police Department to assure that project access and design provide for defensible space and maximum crime prevention while maintaining City design standards and codes. Policy ES-1.10 The city should provide education programs and literature to its residents, business people and property owners on earthquake preparedness, fire safety, flooding hazards and other emergencies. Program ES-1.10o: Maintain and distribute emergency preparedness information and handouts at City Hall, the Senior Center and Library, and at community events. Additionally, the City's website and other media resources shall be utilized to inform and educate residents and business owners on emergency preparedness matters. 5.12.4 Project Impacts Thresholds of Significance The following standards and criteria have been drawn from Appendix G Environmental Checklist Form of the CEQA Guidelines to assess the significance of potential impacts to public services and facilities that may result from the adoption and implementation of the La Quinta Village Build -out La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.12-5 August 2016 915 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.12 PUBLIC SERVICES Plan. Impacts would be considered significant if implementation of the Plan would result in the following: a. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or create a need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response time or other performance objectives for fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, and other public facilities. a. Impacts to Fire Protection Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan and the increase in population in the overall General Plan Planning Area is expected to result in an increase in demand for fire protection services. Additional equipment, vehicles and staff may be needed as the project area develops with increased density of uses. Equipment and staffing needs will be determined as the project area develops. Upgrades to existing utilities, particularly water mains and installation of new hydrants may also be required as currently undeveloped or less developed properties are developed. The potential cost to the City may be substantial, and on -going monitoring and evaluation of the need for additional facilities and staff may be necessary throughout development of the project area. The County Fire Department evaluates specific development proposals based on their potential to demand additional fire department facilities, equipment and staffing. It considers existing conditions in the project area as well as future needs of such new development in determining whether it is appropriate to require new fire facilities based on the standards set forth in the 1986 Master Plan, as cited above. Implementation of Mitigation Measures PS-1 and PS-2 will ensure that as the project area builds out, new "standards of cover" developed in association with the Department's Strategic Plan will be applied to new development. Future development will continue to be subject to Fire Department review and new fire facilities will be considered as needed to ensure adequate provision of fire protection services in the project area. The City of La Quinta has established Development Impact Fees (DIF) for land use types. For residential uses, the DIF for Fire Protection is $206 per multi -family dwelling unit. The 1,203 proposed dwelling units in the Village Build -out Plan project area would all be condominiums or apartments. For non-residential uses, the DIF is $172 for General Commercial, $162 for Tourist Commercial, and $171 for Office Space. Therefore, with payment of the DIF for each land use type developed, and the implementation of mitigation measures impacts on fire service would be less than significant. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.12-6 August 2016 916 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.12 PUBLIC SERVICES b. Impacts to Police Protection At build out the City, including its Sphere of Influence, is expected to have a total population of 134,352. The project area itself is expected to add an additional 3,198 new residents. Based on the Riverside County staffing ratio, the police department will require 134 sworn officers at City build out. This is an increase of 78 sworn officers as compared with current staffing levels, which represents a substantial additional demand for police protection and associated equipment and patrol vehicles. For the Village Build -out Plan, the number of new sworn officers for the 3,198 new residents would be 3.2 based on a ratio of 1 officer per 1,000 population. Demand for police protection in the Village will depend on actual development in the future. Implementation of Mitigation Measures PS-3 and PS-4 will ensure that as new development is proposed within the Village Build -out Plan project area, the Police Department would review projects and City will continue to monitor population growth and staffing levels to assure that the Police Department can provide adequate police protection in the project area. Therefore, implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will not have a significant effect on Police Services. c. Impacts on Schools New development in the project area will occur over time, and student populations are also expected to increase gradually. DSUSD facilities planners look for new school sites or ways to increase the efficiency of existing school sites to accommodate additional students as the population increases. A total of 15,461 dwelling units is anticipated to be developed in the DSUSD boundary by 2035, including new residential construction in the City of La Quinta. According to the DSUSD Fee Justification Report (2014), 15,156 unmitigated dwelling units are anticipated to be developed, creating a need for new school facilities. The proposed 1,230 dwelling units proposed in the project area are likely to be in addition to this number, as the City is proposing to increase the density of residential use in the project area. Table 5.12-3, School Facilities for Projected Students from New Development, shows the number of schools that DSUSD anticipates to be necessary with increased population and residential development. Table 5.12-2 School Facilities for Projected Students from New Development School Type Student Generation Rate Existing School Capacity Adjusted Future Students' School Facility Capacity Total Facilities Elementary 0.1776 790 1,890 858 2.20 Middle 0.0934 728 692 1,200 0.58 High School 0.1307 771 1,208 2,000 0.60 Source: Desert Sands Unified School District, Fee Justification Report 2014. Notes: 1. Number of students generated from unmitigated new dwelling units has been reduced by the existing school capacity in the report. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.12-7 August 2016 917 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.12 PUBLIC SERVICES DSUSD will continue to receive developer's impacts fees for residential, commercial and industrial development, including fees from new development in the project area. Currently (July 2016), DSUSD fees are $3.36 per square foot for new residential development and $0.56 per square foot for commercial development. However, some schools are currently operating at or beyond capacity, and new facilities will be needed to serve the build out student population for the entire City including the project area, even though currently DSUSD intends to close John Adam Elementary School and utilize it as a pre-school, or other related school use. The reuse of this elementary school is a temporary use. Mitigation Measure PS-5 is set forth below to ensure that any potential adverse effects to public schools are reduced to less than significant levels. Ultimate build -out in the project area would create 1,230 new residential units, and 799,786 square feet of non-residential uses. For the purposes of this analysis an average dwelling unit would be 1,500 square feet. Under DSUSD's most current fee schedule, at the current student generation rate of $3.36 per square foot per dwelling unit, the project area could generate $6,199,200 for 1,230 dwelling units. At the current student generation rate of $0.56 per square foot of non- residential uses, the project at build -out could generate $447,880 for the additional 799,786 square feet. d. Impacts on parks Please refer to section 5-15, Recreation. e. Impacts on other public facilities Libraries At build out, the City and its Sphere of Influence is expected to have a total population of 134,352. The project area itself is expected to add an additional 3,198 new residents. Based on the County Library System's target standard of two volumes per capita, the estimated build out population of 79,956 in the City limits will require 268,704 volumes at build out of the General Plan, including build -out of the project area. Under this scenario, additional facilities would also likely be required to house the additional volumes and serve patrons. However, the mission of a library has been changing over the past few years as the internet has provided virtually limitless access to information, books, magazines, job information and applications, health information and online classes. Libraries are being challenged to stay relevant and continue to offer their users a reason to come in and use the facilities. They are doing this by offering free wireless access and free computer access to allow residents to search beyond the walls of the library out to other libraries, museums, government agencies, etc. for entertainment and information. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.12-8 August 2016 918 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.12 PUBLIC SERVICES The City assesses Developer Impact Fees (DIF) on residential development for library services and facilities. Currently, fees are assessed at $348 for multi -family units. The 1,230 new dwelling units in the Village would be condominiums or apartments. These are one-time fees assessed when new units are constructed. Based on these fees, new residential development in project area (1,230 new multi -family units) would generate $428,040 for libraries. 5.12.5 Cumulative Impacts Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will increase the demand for public services and facilities. As development occurs within the project area, the incremental and cumulative increase in population will require additional police and fire protection, school and library services, parks and recreation facilities. Public services and facilities will incur proportional increases in service demands as generated by new development in the project area. Fees collected are used to offset increased demands to public services and facilities by funding school and library expansions, roadway improvements and development of new or expanded public buildings. Increased property tax and sales tax revenue also provide additional funding for new police and fire services. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measures PS-1 through PS-6 and adherence to goals, policies and programs as identified in this section, all new development within the project area will assist in minimizing cumulative impacts to public services and facilities and are expected to be less than significant. 5.12.6 Mitigations Measures Fire Impacts associated with provision of fire protection services will be reduced to less than significant levels with the implementation of the following mitigation measures: PS-1 The City and Riverside County Fire Department shall continue to confer and coordinate to ensure that facilities and services within the Village Build -out Plan are expanded in a timely manner. PS-2 The Riverside County Fire Department shall continue to review and evaluate new development proposals and project plans within the Village Build -out Plan to make certain that it can provide adequate fire protection. Police PS-3 All new development projects within the Village Build -out Plan shall be subject to Police Department review to assure that the Department can provide adequate police protection. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.12-9 August 2016 919 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.12 PUBLIC SERVICES PS-4 The City shall monitor City population and Police Department staffing levels to ensure the provision of police protection services at consistent levels. Schools PS-5 Development projects within the Village Build -out Plan shall be assessed statutory school mitigation fees, in place at the time residential and commercial projects are proposed. Libraries PS-6 Development projects within the Village Build -out Plan shall be assessed development impact fees, in place at the time residential and commercial projects are proposed. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Law Enforcement A. On an annual basis, the City shall evaluate response times and police activity to assure adequate protection. Responsible Parties: City Manager, Police Department. Fire Department B. Riverside County Fire Department shall review all development plans prior to issuance of building permits to ensure that development complies with City and Fire Department standards. Responsible Parties: Planning Division, Riverside County Fire Department. School District C. The City shall continue to coordinate with the Coachella Valley Unified School District and Desert Sands Unified School District to assure that statuary developer impact fees are collected. Responsible Party: Planning Division. Libraries D. No mitigation required. Responsible Parties: None. 5.12.7 Level of Significance after Mitigation Implementation of mitigation measures would ensure that impacts on Public Services would be less than significant. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.12-10 August 2016 920 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.13 RECREATION 5.13 Recreation 5.13.1 Introduction This section describes the existing recreational facilities provided by the City of La Quinta to improve quality of life for its residents and assesses impacts on recreational resources from future growth and development brought on by the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan. 5.13.2 Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta offers a variety of passive and active recreational opportunities for residents and visitors to the region. There are approximately 5,259 acres of open space areas set aside for recreational facilities in the City. These developed open space recreational areas include a variety of city owned and maintained parks and facilities, County owned parks, Desert Recreation District facilities and public and private golf courses. The City of La Quinta offers numerous golf courses and resorts, making it a premier destination for golf. In addition, there are approximately 6,933 acres of natural open space areas within the City offering hiking trails, equestrian trails, and other passive recreation opportunities. The City also operates and maintains the La Quinta Wellness Center and La Quinta Museum which are located within the Village Build -out Plan project area. The La Quinta Wellness Center is located where the former Senior Center, near the Civic Center. It was renovated and expanded in late-2014 with improvements to promote wellness for the whole community. The 10,000+ square -foot La Quinta Wellness Center has a fitness center, various wellness classes, a gardening area, special events, and weekly programs for all ages. The La Quinta Museum provides local residents with cultural activities, including art exhibits, programs, and events. The Desert Recreation District provides park facilities and recreation programs throughout the Coachella Valley. Once known as the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District, the Desert Recreation District owns and operates the La Quinta Community Park, and is proposing a Discovery Center near Lake Cahuilla. The La Quinta Community Park is located within the Village Build -out Plan at 77865 Avenida Montezuma, and includes a 6.5-acre park and 5,000 square foot La Quinta Community Fitness Center. The 6.5-acre park includes ball fields, basketball courts, playground, picnic tables, barbecues, restrooms, an outdoor amphitheater, outdoor exercise facilities, and drinking fountains. The La Quinta Community Fitness Center includes fitness equipment, a kitchen, and concessions. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.13-1 August 2016 921 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.13 RECREATION Regulatory Setting Quimby Act California passed the Quimby Act in 1975, allowing local governments to pass ordinances requiring developers to set aside land, donate conservation easements, or pay in -lieu of fees for the development of new parks and recreational facilities. Local governments have come to depend on the Quimby Act for new facilities, or to upgrade existing facilities, as a result of new growth and development. La Quinta Municipal Code Section 13.48 establishes criteria for dedicating land, or payment of in lieu fees for construction of new parks or recreational facilities or rehabilitation of existing facilities. The ordinance states that residential subdivisions, containing less than five parcels, and nonresidential subdivisions, are exempt from dedication or park fees. All other residential developments are required to pay a park development fee, dedicate land, or both. Section 13.48.050 states that parkland dedication requirements shall equal three acres of parkland per one thousand people in a new subdivision. The number of people in a new subdivision is determined by multiplying the number of dwelling units in the subdivision by the average household size. Average household size is based on the latest U.S. Census information. Residential development, as a permitted land use of the Village Commercial designation, would be subject to Quimby fees. Parks Planning and Implementation Tools La Quinta's Community Services Master Plan serves as an important tool for short to mid-term parks and recreation planning and decision making. The five-year plan monitors and surveys public needs and current service levels, and in turn provides service recommendations for implementation. The plan includes a community needs survey, details an inventory of existing services and facilities, and presents a comparison to standardized state and national benchmarks. Healthy Eating Active Living Campaign On February 16, 2010, the La Quinta City Council passed Resolution 2010-013, declaring a commitment to improve and encourage community health and wellness through the Healthy Eating Active Living (HEAL) Campaign sponsored by the California Center for Public Health Advocacy. This commitment includes the promotion of policies to help shape the built environment so that it encourages walking, biking, hiking and other forms of physical activity and provides pedestrian connectivity between parks, schools, retail businesses and residential areas. This initiative also includes supporting access to health and fitness facilities such as the La Quinta Fitness Center, promoting healthy eating through farmers markets and community gardening, and encouraging higher nutrition standards at public concessions. La Quinta Village Build -out area EIR 5.13-2 August 2016 922 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.13 RECREATION 5.13.3 Applicable Goals and Policies rnAl PR-1 A comprehensive system of parks, and recreation facilities and services that meet the active and passive needs of all residents and visitors. Policy PR-1.2 Continue to provide a minimum standard of S acres of parkland for every 1,000 residents. Program PR-1.2.a: Annually review parks and recreational facilities as part of the City's long- range planning. Policy PR-1.6 Encourage patterns of development that promote safe pedestrian and bicycle access to schools, public parks, and recreational areas. Policy PR-1.7 Identify opportunities to integrate public health concerns into parks and trails planning. Policy PR-1.8 Promote a healthy and active lifestyle for all residents. Program PR-1.8.a: Strive to provide residents with affordable access to fitness facilities such as the public pool, fitness center, and golf course. Program PR-1.8.b: Promote the consumption of healthy foods by encouraging healthful foods to be sold at concessions in all public buildings and parks. Program PR-1.8.c: Promote and improve public access to farmers markets and grocery stores that sell fresh produce and healthy foods. 5.13.4 Impact Analysis Thresholds of Significance The thresholds derived from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines are used to determine the level of potential effect. The Build -out Plan would have a significant effect on recreation if it is determined that the project will: a. Would increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. La Quinta Village Build -out area EIR 5.13-3 August 2016 923 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.13 RECREATION a. Impacts on Parks and Facilities The Village Build -out Plan would facilitate new development and would result in approximately 1,230 new residential units and a total added population of 3,198 new residents based on a ratio of 2.6 persons per dwelling unit. However, it is likely that, given the number of seasonal residents that currently reside in the City only a few months out of the year, not all new residents within the project area would utilize the local recreational facilities or other parks within the City. Nonetheless, for purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that added residents would utilize these facilities, resulting in an increase in facility upkeep and maintenance due to increased usage load from various activities (i.e., ball games, outdoor concerts, art and car shows, etc.). In comparison to the Village Build -out Plan, the total number of dwelling units upon build -out of the General Plan will be approximately 31,603 units, with 21,500 of those within the Sphere of Influence. Total build out population is expected to be 79,956 in the City Limits and 54,396 within the Sphere of Influence, for a grand total of 134,352 throughout the General Plan Planning Area. Thus, the potential 3,198 new residents represent an insignificant fraction of the total future population. The General Plan requires the provision of 5 acres of parkland set aside for each 1,000 population. Based on this standard, a population of 3,198 at build out of the Village would require a total of 15 acres of parkland. In order to ensure funding is acquired for future purchases of land, all new development and redevelopment projects will be required to pay development impact fees directed towards the preservation, expansion and maintenance of the City's recreational parks and facilities, and contribute to new parkland acquisition in accordance with the Quimby Act. This process will assure that new park expansion is funded and assist in maintaining consistency with Policy PR-1.2. Existing recreational facilities within the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area would continue to be maintained and supplemented through development impact fees set forth by the City of La Quinta. The City of La Quinta has established Development Impact Fees (DIF) for Parks/Recreation and Park Maintenance Facilities that apply to residential projects only. The 1,230 proposed dwelling units in the Village would all be condominiums or apartments. The DIF for Parks/Recreation is currently $2,048 per multi -family dwelling unit and the DIF for Park Maintenance Facilities is currently $40 per multi -family dwelling unit. New residential development and redevelopment projects would be required to pay the most up-to-date development impact fees at the time of project development, and thus would safeguard funding for maintenance and improvements to existing parks within the City. Therefore, with payment of Quimby Act Fees and City DIF, impacts in regard to parks and recreation facilities as a result of implementation of the Village Build -out Plan would be less than significant. b. Impacts on the environment due to parks and facilities The project area would result in an increase in residents, expanding retail opportunities within mix - use areas of the Village would have a positive impact as it would strengthen and maintain events and La Quinta Village Build -out area EIR 5.13-4 August 2016 924 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.13 RECREATION activities promoted under the HEAL Cities Campaign in 2010 which helps City officials to adopt policies that promote healthy environments and physical activity within their community. The campaign was adopted to meet General Plan Policy PR-1.8, promote a healthy and active lifestyle for all residents. By maintaining consistency with Policy PR-1.8, HEAL would assist in encouraging residents and visitors to participate in walking, biking and sports -related activities, and attract local revenue to the project. A number of programs and activities could be implemented into the Build - out Plan with the promoting and expanding of the HEAL program, including the continued promotion of farmers' markets, creation of a community garden, promoting recreational activity and providing safe routes to school. The La Quinta Wellness Center is located within the Village Build -out Plan project area where the former Senior Center was located near the Civic Center. It was renovated and expanded in late-2014 with improvements to promote wellness for the whole community. The 10,000+ square - foot La Quinta Wellness Center has a fitness center, various wellness classes, a gardening area, special events, and weekly programs for all ages. The recent expansion of the Wellness Center provides additional recreational resources to existing and future residents of the Village and reduces the need for new recreational facilities in the vicinity. Therefore, implementation of the project will not have a negative impact on the environment due the construction of new parks and facilities. 5.13.5 Cumulative Impacts Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will not create cumulative impacts to recreational resources. As discussed above, all new development will be required to contribute applicable development impact fees and Quimby fees towards the preservation, expansion and maintenance of the City's recreational parks and facilities. Therefore, with adherence to goals, policies and programs as identified in this Section, all new development within the Village Build -out Plan will assist in minimizing cumulative impacts in regard to recreation and are expected to be less than significant. 5.13.6 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures will be required as a result of project implementation. However, each project will be required to pay Quimby fees for the acquisition of additional park space. This will be determined on a project by project basis as some projects proposed on underutilized properties may not be required to pay the fee, based on what is being proposed. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting A. No mitigation measures have been identified. 5.13.7 Level of Significance after Mitigation The requirement for all development and redevelopment to pay Quimby fees and applicable DIF would support necessary acquisition, improvements, and maintenance of recreational facilities within the City of La Quinta, and impacts associated with Parks and Recreation would be less than significant. La Quinta Village Build -out area EIR 5.13-5 August 2016 925 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.13 RECREATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out area EIR 5.13-6 August 2016 WT ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION 5.14 Traffic and Circulation 5.14.1 Introduction This section describes the existing setting regarding traffic and circulation around and throughout the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area. This section is based on the information contained in the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Traffic Impact Analysis, (TIA) prepared by Kunzman Associates, May 2016, and the 2035 La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. The TIA is included as Appendix E of this EIR. The TIA analyzed traffic impacts for existing conditions, existing plus project conditions (build -out year 2035), and an interim year of 2021, at which time approximately three years of development is assumed. The TIA also analyzed potential project traffic impacts for General Plan Build -out traffic conditions, which coincide with the anticipated build out of the proposed La Quinta Village Build -out Plan. Finally, the TIA evaluated the City's preferred Circulation Plan that includes traffic calming methods such as round-abouts and parking strategies, as well as non -motorized strategies such as enhanced sidewalks, and shared bike/golf cart lanes. 5.14.2 Environmental Setting The proposed project consists of developing a build -out plan for the Village in the City of La Quinta. The project area consists of approximately 137 acres of land generally located on both sides of Calle Tampico, north of Avenue 52, east of Eisenhower Drive, and west of Washington Street. The build - out plan includes several multi -modal enhancements to the circulation network as discussed further in this section. Exhibit 5.14-1, Project Intersections and Roadway Locations, shows the project location map and study area. The City's General Plan 2035 was adopted in 2013 and focused on the next 20+ years, through 2035. It is the City's intent to allow the Village Build -out Plan project area to continue to develop through market forces including demand for additional housing, commercial uses, and professional office space. The 20 year build -out scenario coincides with the General Plan build -out scenario. Study Area The study area is shown in Exhibit 5.14-1 and consists 16 study intersections and 22 roadway segments as shown in Table 5.14-1, Study Area Intersections, and Table 5-14-2, Study Area Roadway Segments. Intersecting streets are characterized as north -south (NS) or east -west (EW). La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14- 1 August 2016 927 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Table 5.14-1 Study Intersections ID Intersection Jurisdiction 1 Eisenhower Drive (NS) at Avenue 50 (EW) La Quinta 2 Eisenhower Drive (NS) at Calle Tampico (EW) La Quinta 3 Eisenhower Drive (NS) at Avenida Montezuma (EW) La Quinta 4 Eisenhower Drive (NS) at Calle Sinaloa (EW) La Quinta 5 Avenida Bermudas (NS) at Calle Tampico (EW) La Quinta 6 Avenida Bermudas (NS) at Calle Sinaloa/Avenue 52 (EW) La Quinta 7 Desert Club Drive (NS) at Calle Tampico (EW) La Quinta 8 Desert Club Drive (NS) at Avenue 52 (EW) La Quinta 9 Washington Street (NS) at Avenue 48 (EW) La Quinta 10 Washington Street (NS) at Eisenhower Drive (EW) La Quinta 11 Washington Street (NS) at Avenue 50 (EW) La Quinta 12 Washington Street (NS) at Calle Tampico (EW) La Quinta 13 Washington Street (NS) at Avenida La Fonda (EW) La Quinta 14 Washington Street (NS) at Avenue 52 (EW) La Quinta 15 Jefferson Street (NS) at Avenue 50 (EW) La Quinta/Indio 16 Jefferson Street (NS) at Avenue 52 (EW) La Quinta Source: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan TIA, Study Intersections Table, Page 2, Kunzman Associates Inc., May 2016. Table 5.14-2 Study Roadway Segments Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Eisenhower Drive North of Avenue 50 La Quinta Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico La Quinta Calle Tampico to Avenida Montezuma La Quinta Avenida Montezuma to Calle Sinaloa La Quinta Avenida Bermudas Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 La Quinta Desert Club Drive Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 La Quinta Washington Street Avenue 48 to Eisenhower Drive La Quinta Eisenhower Drive to Avenue 50 La Quinta Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico La Quinta Calle Tampico to Avenida La Fonda La Quinta Avenida La Fonda to Avenue 52 La Quinta Jefferson Street Avenue 50 to Avenue 52 La Quinta Avenue 50 Eisenhower Drive to Washington Street La Quinta Washington Street to Jefferson Street La Quinta Calle Tampico Eisenhower Drive to Avenida Bermudas La Quinta Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club Drive La Quinta Desert Club Drive to Washington Street La Quinta Avenida La Fonda West of Washington Street La Quinta Calla Sinaloa Eisenhower Drive to Avenida Bermudas La Quinta Avenue 52 Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club Drive La Quinta Desert Club Drive to Washington Street La Quinta Washington Street to Jefferson Street La Quinta Source: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan TIA, Study Intersections Table, Page 3, Kunzman Associates Inc., May, 2016. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-2 August 2016 928 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Analysis Scenarios Based on scoping discussions with City staff, the TIA analyzes the following scenarios: 1. Existing Conditions; 2. Existing Plus Project Conditions; 3. Interim Year (2021) Without Project Conditions; 4. Interim Year (2021) With Project Conditions; 5. General Plan Build -out (Year 2035) Without Project Conditions; and 6. General Plan Build -out (Year 2035) With Project Conditions. Regulatory Setting The TIA was prepared in accordance with the Traffic Study Guidelines provided in the City of La Quinta Engineering Bulletin #06-13 (Revised December 8, 2014) and the City -approved scoping agreement contained in TIA Appendix B. Intersection Analysis Methodology Initial existing peak hour traffic volumes were determined based upon morning peak period and evening peak period intersection turning movement counts conducted in December 2015 during typical weekday conditions. Initial peak hour traffic volumes were compared to the seasonally adjusted "existing" traffic volumes contained in the TIA for the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element Update, prepared in 2012. ) The existing seasonally adjusted traffic volumes from the General Plan TIA were used for the Village Build -out TIA at locations that showed higher traffic volumes compared to the turning movement counts collected in 2015. The traffic engineer observed that the traffic volumes shown in the General Plan TIA at study intersections near the Village Build -out Plan project area were approximately 1.19 times greater in the morning peak hour and approximately 1.12 times greater in the evening peak hour. Therefore, at study intersections near the project area for which traffic volumes were not included in the General Plan TIA, the 2015 traffic counts were increased accordingly and adjusted for reasonable flow conservation between intersections. The result of this process is a highly conservative set of baseline traffic volumes which in no case are less than recently collected traffic data or less than historical traffic data from the General Plan TIA. The existing average daily traffic volumes were obtained from the 2015 Traffic Census Report prepared by the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) and from new traffic counts collected over a 24-hour period in December 2015 for the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan area. Similarly, daily traffic volumes collected in December 2015 were compared to the General Plan TIA. The only two locations in which daily traffic volumes shown in the General Plan TIA were greater were based on estimates La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-3 August 2016 929 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-4 August 2016 930 1 45 3 Dol 4=6`� 8 � :Ll 1 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-6 August 2016 932 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION derived from the peak hour counts. Since the 2015 daily traffic counts were greater at all other locations, the 2015 daily traffic counts were used for Village Build -out Plan TIA. The TIA analyzed the proposed project using the intersection delay method based on the procedures contained in the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 2000). The methodology compares the volume of traffic using the intersection to the capacity of the intersection to calculate the delay associated with the traffic control at the intersection. The intersection delay is then correlated to a performance measure known as Level of Service. Definitions for levels of service (LOS) are provided in Table 5.14-6, Level of Service Intersection Control Delay. Table 5.14-3 Level of Service Intersection Control Delay Level Intersection Control Delay (Seconds / Vehicle) of Signalized Unsignalized Service Intersection Intersection A <_ 10.0 <_ 10.0 B >10.0to520.0 > 10.0 to<_ 15.0 C >20.0to<_35.0 >15.0to<_25.0 D >35.0to<_55.0 >25.0to<_35.0 E >55.0to<_80.0 >35.0to<_50.0 F >80.0 >50.0 Source: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan TIA, Study Intersections Table, Page 6, Kunzman Associates Inc., May 2016. LOS is used to qualitatively describe the performance of a roadway facility, ranging from LOS A (free - flow conditions) to LOS F (extreme congestion and system failure). Per the Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and LOS are shown for intersections with all traffic signal, all way stop, and roundabout yield controls. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. Performance Standards The City of La Quinta has established LOS D as the minimum acceptable Level of Service for its signalized intersections and roadway segments. Therefore, any signalized intersection operating at LOS E or F will be considered deficient. For unsignalized intersections, the City of La Quinta has established a minimum acceptable LOS D at an all way stop controlled intersection and LOS E for a side street at a two-way stop controlled intersection (i.e., cross street stop). La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-7 August 2016 933 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Existing Conditions Existing Traffic Controls & Intersection Geometry Highway 111 and the 1-10 Freeway to the north provide regional access for the City of La Quinta. North -south roadways that provide local circulation for the project area include Eisenhower Drive, Avenida Bermudas, Desert Club Drive, Washington Street, and Jefferson Street. East -west roadways that provide local circulation for the project area include Avenue 50, Calle Tampico, and Avenue 52. Exhibit 5.14-2, City of La Quinta Roadway Classifications, shows the classifications for the roads in and around the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan project area. Exhibit 5.14-3, General Plan Roadway Cross - sections, shows the roadway cross-section for each classification shown in Exhibit 5.14-2. Exhibit 5.14-2 shows the nature and extent of arterial and collector roadways that are needed to adequately serve the ultimate development designated by the Land Use Element of the General Plan. As used below, "study area" includes the area analyzed within the TIA, which extends beyond the project area. Eisenhower Drive: This north -south four lane divided roadway is classified as a Primary Arterial (108 foot right-of-way) in the study area in the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries approximately 9,500 to 15,500 vehicles per day in the study area. Avenida Bermudas: This north -south two lane to four lane divided roadway is classified as a Secondary Arterial (102 foot right-of-way) in the study area in the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries approximately 3,400 vehicles per day in the study area. Desert Club Drive: This north -south two lane undivided roadway is not classified in the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element, and as such is a considered a local roadway. It currently carries approximately 1,900 vehicles per day in the study area. Washington Street: This north -south six lane divided roadway is classified as a Major Arterial (128 foot right-of-way) in the study area in the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries approximately 12,500 to 40,500 vehicles per day in the study area. Jefferson Street: This north -south six lane divided roadway is classified as a Major Arterial (128 foot right-of-way) in the study area in the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries approximately 19,500 vehicles per day in the study area. Avenue 50: This east -west three lane undivided to four lane divided roadway is classified as a Primary Arterial (108 foot right-of-way) in the study area in the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries approximately 2,900 to 10,700 vehicles per day in the study area. Calle Tampico: This east -west four lane divided roadway is classified as a Primary Arterial (108 foot right-of-way) in the study area in the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries approximately 4,300 to 16,600 vehicles per day in the study area. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-8 August 2016 934 The Altum Group General Plan Roadway Classifications La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 3�.14-2 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-10 August 2016 ATTACH MEN T 1 RM PJW 80' Collector 72` op 71 61 2'— 12' 1 11' '4' 7' 102' Secondary Arterial RM RM 7 WT_PX11F < 128' Major Arterial Source: La Quinta General Plan 2035, Figure 11-3 E115 The Alturn Group RrW RW QA- .......... 84' Modified Secondary Arterial RM 108, RrW 0 7, M 17711,< FIN 108' Primary Arterial RRN 81 1 12' 1 12' 1 14' 1 24' 1 14' 1 12' 1 12' 1 B' Mti M I M, N 146" State Highway 111 1-3-3 I-tuglimiltru iV_K4JV1 General Plan Roadway Cross -Sections La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report K1W .011 Exhibit 5.14-3 937 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-12 August 2016 938 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Avenue 52: This east -west four lane divided roadway is classified as a Primary Arterial (108 foot right- of-way) in the study area in the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. It currently carries approximately 5,800 to 15,600 vehicles per day in the study area. Existing Roadway Segment and Intersection Levels of Service Table 5.14-4, Existing Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis, shows the roadway segment capacity for existing conditions in the study area. All roadway segments currently operate within acceptable levels of service. The morning and evening peak hour levels of service for existing traffic conditions at intersections have been calculated and are shown in Table 5.14-5, Existing Intersection Delay and Level of Service. As shown in Tables 5.14-4 and 5.14-5, the study area intersections currently operate within acceptable levels of service during the peak hours for existing traffic conditions. Table 5.14-4 Existing Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis Roadway Segment Roadway Section Maximum Daily Capacity Average Daily Traffic Volume Volume to Capacity (V/C) Ratio Level of Service North of Avenue 50 4D 42,600 15,500 0.36 A Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 4D 42,600 12,500 0.29 A Eisenhower Dr. Calle Tampico to Avenida Montezuma 4D 42,600 12,200 0.29 A Avenida Montezuma to Calle Sinaloa 4D 42,600 9,500 0.22 A Avenida Bermudas Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 2D 19,000 3,400 0.18 A Desert Club Dr. Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 2U 14,000 1,900 0.14 A Avenue 48 to Eisenhower Drive 6D 61,100 40,500 0.66 B Eisenhower Drive to Avenue 50 6D 61,100 26,900 0.44 A Washington St Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 6D 61,100 23,100 0.38 A Calle Tampico to Avenida La Fonda 6D 61,100 14,600 0.24 A Avenida La Fonda to Avenue 52 6D 61,100 12,500 0.20 A Jefferson St Avenue 50 to Avenue 52 6D 61,100 19,500 0.32 A Eisenhower Dr to Washington St 4D 42,600 2,900 0.07 A Avenue 50 Washington St to Jefferson St 4D 42,600 10,700 0.25 A Eisenhower Drive to Avenida Bermudas 4D 42,600 4,300 0.10 A Calle Tampico Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club Drive 4D 42,600 7,100 0.17 A Desert Club Dr to Washington St 4D 42,600 16,600 0.39 A Avenida La Fonda West of Washington Street 2U 14,000 1,400 0.10 A Calle Sinaloa Eisenhower Drive to Avenida Bermudas 4D 42,600 5,800 0.14 A Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club Drive 4D 42,600 14,600 0.34 A Avenue 52 Desert Club Dr to Washington St 4D 42,600 15,600 0.37 A Washington St to Jefferson St 4D 42,600 11,500 0.27 A Source: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan TIA, Table 1, Kunzman Associates Inc., May 27, 2016. Notes: D = Divided (can be a raised curb or painted median), U = Undivided La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-13 August 2016 939 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Table 5.14-5 Existing Intersection Delay and Level of Service Intersection' Traffic Contro12 Peak Hour Delay -LOSS Morning Evening Eisenhower Drive (NS) at: Avenue 50 (EW) - #1 TS 17.6-13 21.2-C Calle Tampico (EW) - #2 TS 22.1-C 28.3-C Avenida Montezuma (EW) - #3 AWS 20.5-C 14.7-B Calle Sinaloa (EW) - #4 RBT 8.1-A 6.1-A Avenida Bermudas (NS) at: Calle Tampico (EW) - #5 TS 27.2-C 26.7-C Calle Sinaloa/Avenue 52 (EW) - #6 TS 43.7-D 29.6-C Desert Club Drive (NS) at: Calle Tampico (EW) - #7 TS 34.1-C 31.7-C Avenue 52 (EW) - #8 TS 10.3-13 14.5-13 Washington Street (NS) at: Avenue 48 (EW) - #9 TS 23.9-C 20.1-C Eisenhower Drive (EW) - #10 TS 24.2-C 21.0-C Avenue 50 (EW) - #11 TS 28.6-C 23.2-C Calle Tampico (EW) - #12 TS 25.5-C 26.3-C Avenida La Fonda (EW) - #13 CSS 19.4-C 18.4-C Avenue 52 (EW) - #14 TS 22.0-C 25.0-C Jefferson Street (NS) at: Avenue 50 (EW) - #15 TS 32.9-C 33.4-C Avenue 52 (EW) - #16 RBT 6.5-A 7.1-A Source: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan TIA, Table 1, Kunzman Associates Inc., May 27, 2016. Notes: 1. Numbers following streets correspond to the intersections identified in Exhibit 5.16-1, Project Intersections and Roadway Locations. 2. TS = Traffic Signal; AWS = All Way Stop; RBT = Roundabout; CSS = Cross Street Stop 3. Intersection delay and Level of Service (LOS) has been calculated using the following analysis software: Traffix, Version 7.9.0215. Per the Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal, all way stop, and roundabout yield controls. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-14 August 2016 940 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element Golf Cart, Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Exhibit 5.14-4, Project Vicinity Golf Cart/NEV Paths, shows the City's existing golf cart and neighborhood electric vehicle paths in the vicinity of the Village Build -out Plan project area. The master plan for golf carts/NEVs corresponds to the City's Bike Paths and the area. Both Class 2 and Class 3 designations allow these to share the road with bicycles. Exhibit 5.4-5, Project Vicinity Bike Paths Master Plan, shows the City's master plan for bike lanes in the vicinity of the project area. Exhibit 5.14-6, Existing Pedestrian Facilities, show where cross walks and sidewalks are located within the project area. Transit Service The study area is currently served by the SunLine Transit Agency Route 70 along Washington Street. Exhibit 5.14-7, Existing SunLine Bus Routes, shows the routes within the City that can bring visitors to the La Quinta Village. 5.14.3 Applicable Goals and Policies rnAl rip - 1 A transportation and circulation network that efficiently, safely and economically moves people, vehicles, and goods using facilities that meet the current demands and projected needs of the City. Policy CIR -1.4 The General Plan recognizes the need for flexibility in applying and adapting roadway design standards and specifications, and authorizes the Public Works Director to make consistency findings to permit modifications that do not compromise the operational capacity of the subject roadway or intersection. Policy CIR -1.5 Where the construction of multiuse paths is called for but is determined to be infeasible sidewalks shall be constructed along at least one side of these roadways. Policy CIR -1.10 Establish and maintain minimum standards for roadway geometries, points of access and other improvements that facilitate movement of traffic onto and off of the roadway network. Program CIR-1.10.d: On Calle Tampico, between Eisenhower Drive and Washington, and on Eisenhower Drive, between Calle Tampico and Avenida Bermudas, full turn intersections may be permitted at a minimum distance of 500 feet, if the intersection complies with an approved Corridor Signal Plan. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-15 August 2016 941 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Program CIR - 1.10.e: On Secondary Arterials, the minimum intersection spacing shall be 600 feet. The design speed shall be 40 mph. Full access to adjoining property shall be avoided and shall exceed the following minimum separation distances (in all cases, distances shall be measured between the curb returns): • more than 250 feet on the approach leg to a full turn intersection; • more than 150 feet on the exit leg from a full turn intersection; and • more than 250 feet between driveways. All access configurations shall be subject to City Engineer review and approval. Program CIR-1.10.j: The City Engineer shall establish and maintain a traffic ---calming program that details acceptable traffic calming devices or concepts in residential neighborhoods. The City may review and finalize the 2008 "Neighborhood Traffic Management Program "for this purpose. Policy CIR -1.12 As a means of reducing vehicular traffic on major roadways and to reduce vehicle miles traveled by traffic originating in the City, the City shall pursue development of a land use pattern that maximizes interactions between adjacent or nearby land uses. Program CIR - 1.12.a: Locate land uses that provide jobs and housing near each other to allow the use of alternative modes of travel and produce shorter work commutes. Program CIR - 1.12.b: Encourage, and where appropriate require, mixed -use and contiguous commercial development to provide optimum internal connections between uses. Program CIR - 1.12.c: New development shall provide pedestrian and bicycle connections to adjacent streets, and assure that infrastructure and amenities accommodate pedestrian and bicycle use. Program CIR - 1.12.d: Update and facilitate use of the City's home occupation ordinance as a means of reducing the need for travel. Program CIR - 1.12.e: Encourage major employers to evaluate tele-commuting opportunities, either home -based or at local centers, as well as part-time options for employees. Policy CIR - 2.1 Encourage and cooperate with SunLine Transit Agency on the expansion of routes, facilities, services and ridership especially in congested areas and those with high levels of employment and commercial services, and encourage the use of most energy efficient and least polluting transportation technologies. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-16 August 2016 942 • Note: Golf Cart/NEV Paths correspond to the City's Bike Paths in the area. Both Class 2 and 3 4 designations allow these i to share the road. i * a i �► *Calle T � mi 111111111111 11111 `IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII/ 'llllllllllli IIIIIIIIP. The Altum Group La Quinta Sports Complex cc M* + Avenue SQ / s a +t ♦ i ♦� I1�L�i♦*� ♦- eta .. ♦♦♦♦** •r Avenue 52 • Silver Rock Resort Golf Cart 1 NEV Paths Class 1 ♦+♦ Class 2 Class 3 Not Permitted 1 •� -K Muli-Use Paths Village Build -Out Area Project Vicinity Golf Cart/NEV Paths La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 4�.14-4 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-18 August 2016 944 The Altum Group Amrr,wa7 ITT-41INZ # t Tar, ROM r 1 �1 Project Vicinity Bike Paths Master Plan La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit .5.14-5 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-20 August 2016 urf .� •` � �� 7 �. FAX _ IL AZ. sa...: D. Mill ![ 'fir �.•� !.� h �. XIow' 1 _ lk . • fiil#tL ma.. i -IL: lr i E' f 1�� i �i� ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-22 August 2016 948 ATTAaW EN T 1 ej nwoa [7! Ada !'r1� of C i,yl i ,S o-, q` MiBgo�tl Gr Ii 4 b Starlight Ln 4 � New Ymak Our 111� 4 lertnestee $�, } Darhy Rd 4 Qt'i s - 'a y �rylanil t- call for Pr are „alaaY'ar �o'c y flS n+a a p° Wwlnq Or _ Flwda Avr ' - Fret Yla rin Dr - - F`.e61 Fred Warkng Dr q Ilti9upn M?`nat 1: Ou VIIIeL. D' vuR „ G ildb Irldan Emerald Dr i•1 H�I.r�„c } ranl: 41ti1b tennq Palms' I_-yll:_lub. ndian Wells Ilglun W.d. ra]M COYt> 61>rN as lgFlh Tirthn Fal'n_ unK3en Mlles Ave v Miles Ave u Irvd r, "x hc•I = i S Pebble Eleach. Dr J Or 3 I lllt F a+t"'aY Ira�4 pn Pr Irl:u �Il yl"„n,, ; Yrark !r>Me r: Weatwatd Ho Dr Avenue. :ountry t, lu tl t�uullnw c II ar M1 y e. a 4 u L}a rt Sand! Jra Florence lr9[1 31d Awe ,�•,•'I•. � . .,I A—m 49 Avenue 48 ldr _ 4 �i5enhavar O_ i nJ �A W'arr_Ae L;r4J ItrIKa $ 4911, Ave Ie� Mt 6 La iJWlrno 'eh�a i:dltMry a_klh 3 =_unKr '=1uLl Q �� 5 ayenrda F.—el. q yin E �p _m Avenue 5'b,tNatle-_ Avrrtiue Sq_ VtaA� ,fq u a MartUarkna 1'mrneiagp y� x y O CpRe 4.:., 'iurraa T. u y Pfna Cergrn lrcl.�t gaga _,urns. _lulr 4 u u t.". a rF�M�antenlrn� SlrFne Py4'� Dr W �'�Ct �,eacdn Dr f FLilr � �C d Ina Galiap an q+s �Fhltle 52 Irss.+;. ar 32ndA 1'i.e.tnlen'.oll'ay ._I�.I•. 40 Call* nbra II:e. $Q oq enn CI vit' a ams �vrrii oe= d�c Q N �� € fie. r4 :& H,Gate O` S.{qi-Ave W E 22 LO > Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS,, Iritermap, increment P Corp., S �` c"0r °"" NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailandlp,Gne" Mapmylndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User 1 inch = 4,000 feet Community ° u E115 The A1tum Group Project Existing SunLine Bus Routes La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 5-14.7 949 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-24 August 2016 950 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Program CIR - 2.2.a: Create an interconnected transportation system that allows a shift in travel from private passenger vehicles to alternative modes, including public transit, golf carts/NEVs, ride -sharing, car -sharing, bicycling, bicycle -sharing, and walking. To the extent practicable apply the following: a. Ensure transportation centers that are multi -modal, facilitate changes in travel modes, and are conveniently located. Convenient locations may be in the vicinities of: 1. Washington/Fred Waring/Via Sevilla 2. Miles/Adams 3. Adams/Highway 111/Avenue 47 4. Avenue 47/Caleo Bay 5. Washington/Calle Tampico 6. Eisenhower/Avenida Montezuma c. Expand golf cart/NEV routes, and bicycle routes to connect residential and activity centers with transportation centers. d. Support and encourage community car -sharing to provide "station cars" and/or golf carts/NEVs for short trips to/from transit centers. e. Include parking spaces for car -share vehicles at convenient locations accessible to public transit. f. Ensure transit stops are safe and sheltered, with adequate seating, lighting, trash receptacles, cleaning and maintenance. i. Implement bicycle -preferential measures such as deployment of video detection at traffic signals, and development of bicycle stations at transportation centers. j. Encourage covered, secure bicycle parking near building entrances and at transportation centers. k. Adopt bicycle parking standards that accommodate at least 5% of projected parking demand at all public and commercial facilities. I. Conduct bicycle and pedestrian safety educational programs to teach drivers, riders, and walkers the laws, riding protocols, routes, safety tips, and "healthy community" benefits. Program CIR-2.2.e: Adopt a comprehensive parking policy that encourages the use of alternative transportation, including requiring new commercial and retail developments to provide preferred parking for electric vehicles and vehicles using alternative fuels. Program CIR-2.2.g: Modify the Zoning Ordinance to recognize and provide a parking credit program for developments that provide spaces and facilities for golf carts, NEVs and bicycles. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-25 August 2016 951 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Policy CIR - 2.3 Develop and encourage the use of continuous and convenient pedestrian and bicycle routes and multi -use paths to places of employment, recreation, shopping, schools, and other high activity areas with potential for increased pedestrian, bicycle, and golf cart/NEV modes of travel. Program CIR - 2.3.a: Maintain and periodically update the Circulation Element master plan of bikeways, golf cart routes and multi -use paths, and develop or require the development of secure bicycle and golf cart/NEV storage facilities, and other support facilities which increase bicycle and golf cart/NEV use. Policy LU-7.5 Develop a Master Non -Motorized Transportation Plan for the Village. Policy LU-7.7 Continue to allow off -site parking through the payment of in lieu fees in the Village, as well as other creative parking alternatives. 5.14.4 Project Impacts Thresholds of Significance The following thresholds are derived from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, and are used to determine the level of potential effect. The significance determination is based on the recommended criteria set forth in Section 15064 of the CEQA Guidelines. Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan would have a significant effect on traffic and circulation if it is determined that the project will: a. Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b. Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks. d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment). e. Result in inadequate emergency access. f. Result in inadequate parking capacity. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-26 August 2016 952 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. To further define threshold b above, a potentially significant project traffic impact is defined to occur at any signalized intersection if the addition of project trips would result in the level of service for a given intersection to meet or exceed the criteria below: Post -Project Level of Service Change in Level of Service E Either an increase in delay of 2 seconds or more (HCM) or 30 peak hour trips or more (ICU) on critical movements per lane F Either an increase in delay of 1 second or more (HCM) or 15 peak hour trips or more (ICU) on critical movements per lane A potentially significant project traffic impact at an unsignalized study intersection is defined to occur when, with the addition of project traffic, an intersection has a projected LOS F on a side street for two-way stop control or LOS E or worse for the intersection at an all -way stop controlled intersection and the addition of project traffic results in an addition of three (3) seconds or more of delay for any movement. Roadway segment impacts are those defined to occur on any roadway segment if the segment is projected to be operating at LOS E or LOS F with project traffic included and the peak hour V/C in the peak direction is increased by 0.02 or more by addition of project traffic at existing plus project or at project opening years. If the proposed project is forecast to result in a significant impact at a particular study intersection or roadway segment, feasible mitigation measures must be identified that reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Mitigation measures can be in many forms, including addition of lanes, traffic control modification, or demand management measures. If no feasible mitigation measures can be identified for a significantly impacted facility, the impact will remain significant and unavoidable. alb. Conflict with Applicable Plans, Ordinances, or Policies Measuring the Performance of the Circulation System Trip Generation Trip generation rates were determined for dailytrips, morning peak hour inbound and outbound trips, and evening peak hour inbound and outbound trips for the proposed land uses. The number of trips forecast to be generated by the proposed project are determined by multiplying the trip generation rates by the land use quantities. Table 5.14-6, Project Trip Generation, shows the project trip generation based upon rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, 2012. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-27 August 2016 953 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION The project trip generation shown on Table 5.14-6 accounts for the effect of internal trips resulting from the proposed mix of retail and residential land uses within the Village Build -out Plan project area. For example, a future resident may decide to walk or bike to a future retail land use within the project area, as the City intends to provide a complete network of sidewalks, and provide additional bike infrastructure in the project area. In this case, two vehicular trips would be reduced; one outbound trip from the residential land use and one inbound trip to the retail land use. Internal trips during the morning and evening peak hours were calculated in accordance with procedures contained in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Report 684, 2011. Internal daily trips were calculated in accordance with procedures contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, 2012. Project Evaluation under 2035 General Plan Method of Projection To assess future traffic conditions, existing traffic is combined with project traffic, ambient growth, and other development. The Interim Year for analysis purposes in the TIA is 2021 and the General Plan Build -out year is 2035. The City of La Quinta Traffic Model was used to develop background and General Plan Build -out traffic volumes. Other Development A City-wide cumulative project summary report showing currently approved, under construction, and pending developments was provided by City staff. Table 4-5 in Chapter 4, Project Description, contains the cumulative project summary report as well as project location for the other developments. City of La Quinta Traffic Model To derive background and General Plan Build -out traffic volumes, the City of La Quinta Traffic Model was used for the Village Build -out Plan. The long-range traffic volume forecasts have been determined using the growth increment approach on the Year 2009 and Year 2035 traffic volume forecasts. This difference defines the growth in traffic over the 26 year period. The incremental growth in traffic volume was factored to reflect the forecast growth between existing traffic volumes (Year 2015) and Year 2035. For this purpose, linear growth between the Year 2009 base condition and the forecast Year 2035 condition was assumed. Since the increment between existing Year 2015 and Year 2035 is 20 years of the 26 year time frame, a factor of 0.77 (i.e., 20/26) was used. The average daily traffic forecasts for General Plan Build -out Without Project were also checked for consistency with the forecasts contained in the City of La Quinta General Plan. To derive morning and evening peak hour intersection turning movement volumes, the traffic growth forecasts were further refined using a spreadsheet program developed by the Federal Highway La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-28 August 2016 954 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Administration and consistent with traffic forecasting procedures outlined in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 255. The spreadsheet program used a linear programming algorithm to calculate future individual turning movements based on the relationship of existing intersection turning movements and forecast model growth by approach. Table 5.14-6 Project Trip Generation Land Use Quantity Units' Peak Hour' Daily Morning Evening Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total Trip Generation Rates Specialty Retail' TSF 0.60 0.36 0.96 1.19 1.52 2.71 44.32 Multi -Family Residential - DU 0.10 0.41 0.51 0.40 0.22 0.62 6.65 Trips Generated at Interim Specialty Retail 120.0 TSF 72 43 115 143 182 325 5,318 - Internal Trips' -1 0 -1 -11 -36 -47 -745 - Subtotal 71 43 114 132 146 278 4,573 Multi -Family Residential 195 DU 20 79 99 78 43 121 1,297 - Internal Trips' 0 -1 -1 -36 -11 -47 -182 - Subtotal 20 78 98 42 32 74 1,115 Percent Internal 1% 1% 1% 21% 21% 21% 14% Total Interim Year Trip Generation 1 91 1 121 1 212 1 174 1 178 352 1 5,688 Trips Generated at Build -out Specialty Retail 800.0 TSF 480 288 768 952 1,216 2,168 35,456 - Internal Trips' -5 -2 -7 -75 -226 -301 -4,609 - Subtotal 475 286 761 877 990 1,867 30,847 Multi -Family Residential 1,230 DU 123 504 627 492 271 1 763 8,180 - Internal Trips' -2 -5 -7 -226 -75 -301 -1,063 - Subtotal 121 499 620 266 196 462 7,117 Percent Internal 1% 1% 1% 21% 20% 21% 13% Total Build -out Trip Generation 596 785 1,381 1,143 1,186 2,329 37,964 Source: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan TIA, Table 3, Kunzman Associates Inc., May 27, 2016. Notes: 1. TSF = Thousand Square Feet; DU = Dwelling Units. 2. The Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual does not provide a morning peak hour trip generation rate for Specialty Retail land use; therefore, the morning peak hour trip generation rate the Shopping Center land use (820) was utilized. 3. Internal trips during the AM and PM peak hour were calculated in accordance with procedures contained in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Report 684, 2011. Internal daily trips were calculated in accordance with procedures contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, 2012. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-29 August 2016 955 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION The forecast turning movements developed by the spreadsheet program were reviewed for reasonableness and adjusted as necessary to ensure minimum traffic growth. The end results of the post -processing procedures described are future traffic volumes suitable for analysis. Similar to the comparison process used to establish existing conditions, the initial post -processed traffic volumes were compared to the General Plan Year 2035 forecasts contained in the General Plan Update Analysis. Traffic volumes from the General Plan TIA were used at intersections where the total traffic volume was greater than the post -processed forecasts. Finally, the intersection traffic volumes were adjusted for reasonable flow conservation between intersections. Since the City of La Quinta Traffic Model assumes Build -out of the City in accordance with the General Plan land use designations, the traffic forecasts contained in the traffic model already included some development within the project boundary. In addition, the Village Build -out Plan does not require a general plan amendment as all future uses identified in the Plan are allowed in the project area. Based on the socioeconomic inputs for the project zones, it was estimated that the traffic model accounts for approximately 220,051 square feet of commercial development. Therefore, forecasts of the net project trip generation compared to the traffic model data was used to derive General Plan Build -out With Project traffic volumes. Table 5.14-7, Net Project Trip Generation for General Plan Build -out Analysis, shows the net project trip generation compared to the City of La Quinta Traffic Model data based on the currently adopted General Plan. Future Traffic Volumes Existing Plus Project Traffic Volumes The traffic volumes for Existing Plus Project conditions were derived by adding the project -generated trips to existing traffic volumes. Interim Year Without Project Traffic Volumes The traffic volumes for Interim Year conditions were derived by prorating the General Plan Build -out traffic volumes to the Interim Year and adding trips generated by other developments. Exhibit 5.14- 8, Interim Year Without Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes, Exhibit 5.14-9, Interim Year Without Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes, and Exhibit 5.14-10, Interim Year Without Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes, all show Interim Year intersection volumes without traffic associated with the proposed project. Interim Year With Project Traffic Volumes The traffic volumes for Interim Year With Project conditions were derived by adding trips generated by the proposed project to Interim Year Without Project traffic volumes. Exhibit 5.14-11, Interim Year With Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes, Exhibit 5.14-12, Interim Year With Project Morning La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-30 August 2016 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes, and Exhibit 5.14-13, Interim Year With Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes, all show Interim Year intersection volumes with traffic associated with the proposed project. Table 5.14-7 Net Project Trip Generation for General Plan Build -out Analysis Land Use Quantity Units' Peak Hour' Daily Morning Evening Trip Generation Rates Specialty Retail' - TSF 0.96 2.71 44.32 Multi -Family Residential - DU 0.51 0.62 6.65 Traffic Model/Current General Plan Specialty Retail 220,051 TSF 211 596 9,753 Proposed Village Build -Out Plan Specialty Retail 960,711 TSF 922 2,604 42,579 Internal Trips4 -7 -316 -4,684 Subtotal 915 2,288 37,895 Multi -Family Residential 1,230 DU 627 763 8,180 Internal Trips4 -7 -316 -900 Subtotal 620 447 7,280 Percent Internal 1% 19% 11% Total per Proposed Village Build -Out Plan 1,535 2,735 45,175 Net Trip Generation for General Plan Build -Out Specialty Retail 704 1,692 28,142 Multi -Family Residential 620 447 7,280 Total Net Trip Generation 1,324 2,139 35,422 Source: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan TIA, Table 4, Kunzman Associates Inc., May 27, 2016. Notes: 1. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, 2012, Land Use Categories 220 and 826/820. 2. TSF = Thousand Square Feet; DU = Dwelling Units. 3. The Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual does not provide morning peak hour trip generation rates for the specialty retail land use; therefore, the morning peak hour trip generation rate the shopping center land use (820) was utilized. 4. Internal trips during the AM and PM peak hour were calculated in accordance with procedures contained in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Report 684, 2011. Internal daily trips were calculated in accordance with procedures contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, 2012. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-31 August 2016 957 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-32 August 2016 958 � ��1 �Y Hai �di"•' I ��A �_ : � � � { S' eta 7 ► _:A'� i � Dye 1 TM: j" E '.c, t; 'yhv f qq F t iaj a Ui1:l.is Z" r'" 1v. "!r f ;"ate• N�fi1 - - ,., `�-_ - a� _ � p 5 'a r• t i 1•nuxs . � 4 a s� • .�� w �+�4 = i } ati�+�J1F�ite' ; 4• v.t trfM `SV i �� •w•? nw•r ` � �� S1• `�"a�/��tf� i.. 4 �aZ, �k�t'� ��1 r '�. V '—ILa *e\•$Jum 'M �•�d` ' '• •+rrrw *•.r• ';Lf 4 w 1 +� �' � s '• � {+ *yam S- .,+f i y�a�x nad' •au• •+4,_ ,4� f tom,. ate' !''q rt-•P.� '�:�„yP� ' `: 6..-„ %�T ar?*+s}�= �i unaM,rx,�_ir� � .,y.3 •,jr irk+: xl4 * s r !' tK+rrtasat�a�a1 L J.. � I l � f"d •� r� Nr'� sue,• �+4s fok Ir I Y YcMa lt1l,• �'�6�- t. p'li•x�� ,w�•i•S*11.Y_+ 1. 4 4+6. Desert - . •"^R11 F1>? if �.xa� Yn + .'1''a Y '14.2 Club Drive '¢1�� '` y + i1t1PYtYF6Flt0NItYt' '!7 �tititi s $t107k11Y1P'ep1N • .•�. 9titKllfiIPJAPftllF ' ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-34 August 2016 •.s Avenue48 Legend ©= Intersection Reference No. La Quinta Village Build -Out Project Boundary Eisenhower Dr (NIS) at Eisenhower Dr (NIS) at Avenue 50 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) . _s v' µ m v Ln 4- 20 ri ri -45 + r T r NNM � 4) : �► j 69 4) 1 �► r 143 0 y- o ' 3 c 21� �oo1m 0-► v1v 70� n� to r6 LU Avenue 50 AL Desert Club Drive I r Calle Tampico 0 ar Avenid Montezum AAvenida La Fonda _ Avenue 52 /ram -- I Calle - a Sinaloa M M -a -a a ca Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Ave Bermudas (NS) at Ave Bermudas (NS) at Desert Club Dr (NIS) at Desert Club Dr (NS) at Washington St (NIS) at Ave Montezuma (EW) Calle Sinaloa (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) CII Sinaloa/Ave 52 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) Avenue 48 (EW) vm t11 00 44 t37 t20 M 113 t45 ^' 'C285 rev mMo _4 �mm �201 ooLnN �240 vim �395 0�LO �0 riNO �5 NNN �72 .10ri �194 �1�► r16 j120 4) j126 4)1� j215 4)1'* j71 4) -18 411* r476 2721 4)T(11 4)T(231 4)T(321 4)T( 1051 4)T(731•4)T(01 4) 0� ONo 204� oLnoo 128� tnriN 334-* r-i0,rn 140-moor1217-rioo 0-* 00,N ri lD 00 d' v O r-i O 00 r-i 0) lD ,1 0 r-1 24� ,n 0� ,nri 15� 1 3� ,1M 2� 1� 0� riiD Washington St (NIS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NIS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Jefferson St (NS) at Jefferson St (NS) at Eisenhower Dr (EW) Avenue 50 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) Avenida La Fonda (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) Avenue 50 (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) r, n t 15 I,O t412 `D� t72 Itt0 O) O t 396 --- t296 aNv t373 V n00 Mr\O MNN lD r-I WNlD lD r100 0000 v0)N �2 crr`N F142 N�DM �78 iD�DN �0 N.1M �189 N0i.1 �iri � 381 cr338 4) j3 4) 1 l► �107 4) j48 4) 1 1* j0 4) 4) j108 4) -55 8121 T �► 42? 4) t (► 2441 4) t (► 427872211 651 4) T 4 -+ o iD oo 150 --), oo O Ln 77 -► ko w rn 0 ko ri O 443 -+ w m ri 277 -+ Lo rn r` 261-► cl' 0 r-1 N N l0 N 0 M ri M In M M .1 Ln O �n 00 �Ln 18� 00 15� mri 17� on 14� ,1 1� 49� 228� 1,nN ri ri ri ri N W E S Source: Kunzman Associates, 2016 The Altum Group Interim Year Without Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Volumes La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit J.14-9 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-36 August 2016 •1% Ao 41y Avenid Montezur Calle Sinaloa Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Ave Montezuma (EW) 'iLw4 5E ►1 ipg Z14Z Desert Club Drive La Fonda � ro . _ a v m Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Calle Sinaloa (EW) Legend © = Intersection Reference No. --- = La Quinta Village Build -Out Project Boundary Avenue 50 Avenue 52 rT. 7 Ave Bermudas (NS) at Ave Bermudas (NS) at Desert Club Dr (NS) at Desert Club Dr (NS) at Calle Tampico (EW) CII Sinaloa/Ave 52 (EW) • Calle Tampico (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) r-4r t37 r4 t50 t44 N t42 0 24 t70 0 Ln NVN �25 O� lD 0a•N 498 N r cor"M �-276 �n i 1 W 1n.1nn �385 .-i V N iDr+m1 �408 0) .-i -ODD �763 �1� j50 �1� j300 �1� j200 �1� j424 4)1� j138 4)11* If, j10 lk 143 T 11 T 91 T 39 l) t 511 T 421 T 0� 25� mooN N i—I 84� 0� o -1N mr 139� 37� ro�D �.�� 139� 5� rnlnm rr 249� 12� oovm mmrl 495� 0� 0LDv m N rn r1 Washington St (NS) at Eisenhower Dr (EW) 0 Noom� t49 r,-iM *--8 •) 1 '* j3 660 � 1 �► 1--), -1oN 21m00-4 Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Calle Tampico (EW) 00O1 t98 oma 4-0 4) 1 4 j 285 Washington St (NS) at Avenue 48 (EW) O1D 'C214 .� 1 �► j612 01 0� 01 � 0- numi Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Jefferson St (NS) at Jefferson St (NS) at Avenue 50 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) Avenida La Fonda (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) Avenue 50 (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) ar t345 m0 t56 m t0 m 0 t422 00 `°r,-i t235 0)r,-' t354 rn�� oo1Hm �110 r-1 rnoorn �68 oomN vT00-1 �0 room vNa �411 (D 01 �379 0WO * NooN �363 4) ► -143 4)l� j33 4)l� *-04)l� j42 -v` j194 4) j50 47? 4)T /► 358� 4 T (► G 76-�' 4) T (► 298� or 254--# 4 T (► 58-3' 11) T 137roa 120m-im 0-+ rNo 264-+ voim 402-+ N.io 317—► miDrn 15-;0 ° "'im I 59rn^L" I 40'r, I 0� I `"'rV I 82-,* I mLn' I 309-;�, I NrN Source: Kunzman Associates, 2016 The Altum Group Interim Year Without Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Volumes La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report N wl E S Exhibit �,14-10 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-38 August 2016 964 jo, , t wil 4it co m Tampi ov ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-40 August 2016 e,, A, 4`y Avenid Montezur Calle Sinaloa Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Ave Montezuma (EW) 'iLw4 5E ►1 ipg Z14Z t hh i. rinry l.o4 qM` }�r��t ti.. Desert Club Drive La Fonda Avenue 50 Avenue 52 Legend © = Intersection Reference No. --- = La Quinta Village Build -Out Project Boundary N M • ro -a -a v a m rA. Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Ave Bermudas (NS) at Ave Bermudas (NS) at Desert Club Dr (NS) at Desert Club Dr (NS) at Calle Sinaloa (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) CII Sinaloa/Ave 52 (EW) I Calle Tampico (EW) I Avenue 52 (EW) t12 44 t46 t21 126 t49 r�ry rrNO 6 Ovo MNN 475 M 0 r :TN 4201 Mr,v N tro �203 mrnm 00-- �263 Mr,n crrirn �397 j-16 4) j215 4) j83 411* j18 274-'* 4)T� 31 1 271 hT 381 T 1081 1 761.4)T� 0� or,r4 210� ornri 143� rpoov 337� .10M 183� moo 1220� rroo 24-� r1 to ,n 0� 00 Ln ,nr, 17� rl rr 3� e-r N 00 r,o, 2� 1-i 0) 00 1� rr Washington St (NS) at Eisenhower Dr (EW) m v000 t 15 v�N 4-2 •) 1 '* j3 812 � T �► 4—+ cLnoo 18r"00 Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Calle Tampico (EW) v t77 N N M �4 4) 1 1*j 147 Washington St (NS) at Avenue 48 (EW) 'C 285 1 � j 484 01 4) t 0--0.000 0 --�, i�-I lrvD Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Jefferson St (NS) at Jefferson St (NS) at Avenue 50 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) Avenida La Fonda (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) Avenue 50 (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) 000 '�-412 1D t t72 ^' t0 O) 0)t402 ''"1 - t296 aNv t373 MOO v00N 142 r, N N "WM +--85 lD N LOWr" +--0 ID N ID " 4rn +--194 r_ .1 00 N0ir4 +--387 0 0 00 345 4) 4) l 1* j48 4) l 1* j0 4) l 1* j37 4 l '* j108 4 l �* j55 421 �T�► 3205 4)T(► 42� 4)T(► 787� 4)T(► 230� 4)T(► 66s 4)T� 150--b- ooriM 82 r+wrn 0-+ wwo 451-+ wrnr1 287—► Loor, 275—► ooLDr 15� WOO" Jr, 25� 3l� or, 15� rnM J 1� M.-1 49� �rn rn1Ln 0) 230 00 Zr Ln -4 nN Source: Kurtzman Associates, 2016 The Altum Group Interim Year With Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report N WI*E S Exhibit �114-12 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-42 August 2016 _ fir "" 141 Avenue48 Legend ht _ ©= Intersection Reference No. La Quinta Village Build -Out Project Boundary Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Avenue 50 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) +' t77 Ln t105 r�.M-io Ln�r, 4-16 oMLn 4-0 j �► j91 l �► j299 3 0 • ti 62 1 2 T c .c 16� mio n 121 0� 8� �oa LU Avenue 50 Desert Club Drive ---- r I Calle Tampico 0 ar Avenid Montezu AAvenida La Fonda _ Avenue 52 _ /ram -- I Calle - a Sinaloa- M ro -a -a a ca Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Ave Bermudas (NS) at Ave Bermudas (NS) at Desert Club Dr (NS) at Desert Club Dr (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Ave Montezuma (EW) Calle Sinaloa (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) CII Sinaloa/Ave 52 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) Avenue 48 (EW) Ln00 t38 `' 1 t50 t62 v t45 `n �-49 t77 N`D 'C214 okD LnLnko Nvm �26 LOd'N �112 m�v rnNLn �295 ooMm 0�M �392 0ovv LOm� �454 rn m 000co �765 r` t 0�� 0 4) -52 4) 1 1► j-307 4) 1 '► j-216 4) F424 4) j162 4) 1 1► j-10 4) -627 146-�'' T 51 � T 161 41 T 461 �l T 58-* T 471 •4) T 41) 01 � T 1� rn00v 96� NN 000r, 011, 156� 0MN MNm 144 LnUnM 0)r, 293, oovr` mmm 497� OLD-* 0-* ovr` �V 25� rn 0� N 40� ,1 5� M 12� rr 0 0r.un Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Jefferson St (NS) at Jefferson St (NS) at Eisenhower Dr (EW) Avenue 50 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) Avenida La Fonda (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) Avenue 50 (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) N Lnn t49 oN 4-345 0o t56 M t0 m -i t-433 ^^`-' t235 0r--' t354 o u4 rn r`�M �8 0nN� oo.-im �110 u'f0ice vooLn �82 OOON vrn,-i �0 IIT ODo �Nln �421 .1- 11M +390 NWN �376 4) l 1* j3 4) l �► j 164 l �► j33 � l �► �0 t) l i* j-42 4) l 1* 094 4) l �► -50 ,�1T�► ft 660� 47 431? 4)T(1, 76 298� 4) 264--o' 59 4) 1-10N 137-+ r`r`a 134-► morn 0-+ 00NO 274-+ k.04r» 412-+ N.10 329-* LniDLn M M i--I 21� ,n 15� Ol 00 e- �71 68� lD r'-'Ln n r-I M 41� r. Cn N 0� Ol Ln N 82� rrrr 317� N r, r" Nr,N N W J� F. S Source: Kurtzman Associates, 2016 The Altum Group Interim Year With Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit �914-13 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-44 August 2016 970 7jJ1 m Tampico ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-46 August 2016 972 Avenue48 Legend ©= Intersection Reference No. La Quinta Village Build -Out Project Boundary Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Avenue 50 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) ._s v' MMrn 4-21 NnNim 4-44 4) j66 4) j152 3 0 • ti 33 1 3 �l 1 c 22—+ 0000 0—► vrn�o 8Mrn 0� m� LU Avenue 50 Desert Club Drive I r Calle Tampico 0 ar Avenid Montezum Avenida La Fonda _ Avenue 52 /ram Calle I � - a Sinaloa M M -a -a a ca Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Ave Bermudas (NS) at Ave Bermudas (NS) at Desert Club Dr (NS) at Desert Club Dr (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Ave Montezuma (EW) Calle Sinaloa (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) CII Sinaloa/Ave 52 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) Avenue 48 (EW) 0N LloLno t40 t29 rn � 118 38 01 'C279O1 1 t48 N 1-I6 ]Q 206NM*--219 moN *--281 N14 +--416 0100 +__0 �1�► j15 �1� j123 �1� j158 �1� j222 4) j67 4)11* T •j18 jl 479 1121 �791 �111111 278141 32� 291 4l T T � 0216oLnLn 141ro 1Ln 354� NmLn ,-10 �0 0oM� N Ln Ln O 1rc-I O Ln r1 Ln O 0, ,0 , 2502 r4 Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Jefferson St (NS) at Jefferson St (NS) at Eisenhower Dr (EW) Avenue 50 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) Avenida La Fonda (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) Avenue 50 (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) WM t14t605 ^m t91 m t0 m oo t 916 oor,m t461 C-Jw t568 01 N.--I 1:T--Ln 6 Ln , 1— 1M �31 W�O �0 N00M �245 Nam �534 ��m 4-565 oo�N �3 v.—iN �136 4) l 1► j2 4) l 1 j168 4) l'* j70 .) j 1* j0 4) 11* j39 4) l'* j293 4) l'* j60 1155"' �T�► 8� �T�► 237� �T�► 0-.# ► 746� �T�► 144� �T�► 103" 4)T� 3—i vLnw 28—► r` -io 55-+ lnNa) 0—i .+goo 579-+ 4Lnco 321-+ o0r-irn 519--0, rnr-ioc N 00 to Ln M -11031638I�',0 1550--j, In eN-I L-nI 621-j, 1 NvLno l0 N W E S Source: Kurtzman Associates, 2016 The Altum Group General Plan Build -out Without Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit �: 14-15 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-48 August 2016 974 _ fir "" 141 Avenue48 Legend ht _ ©= Intersection Reference No. La Quinta Village Build -Out Project Boundary Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Avenue 50 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) +' 0 t126 �r1 t63 ._s L +, r1Ln 00r-.4 4-18 01.0N 4-0 4) j �► j81 4) j �► r282 3 0 • 1 93 1� �tT� c c 18 13 0-► -1no0 4� ^a LU Avenue 50 " Desert Club Drive r I Calle Tampico 0 ar Avenid Montezum Avenida La Fonda Avenue 52 _ /ram Calle I - a � Sinaloa M M -a -a a ca Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Ave Bermudas (NS) at Ave Bermudas (NS) at Desert Club Dr (NS) at Desert Club Dr (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Ave Montezuma (EW) Calle Sinaloa (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) CII Sinaloa/Ave 52 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) Avenue 48 (EW) ^v t53 M t99 t52 O1 t51 0 'k25 � 65 M1D t259 tDM OtnO NtDm *--27 mLn 4-103 v v m00v 4290 00� 10 1-t1v *--463 VON LID M4 *--458 00 01 1"0v +--875 MN ON-4 4-0 � 1 �► r55 � 1 �► -314 4) -211 4) 1 10 ,F439 4) -125 4) 1 1► j-12 1* r860 203 T 191 41T 101 �lT 231 �T 571 �T 411•4lT 01 �lT 0� r1oN 93� m-I 30� 0� 0000) 0kD 161, 34� 00r1(1 vl1N 152� tDcn-1 nv 6� 287� r4r1r1 dmo 13� 492� 0LDv 0 0-* 00)00 mOl 0 ,n ro tntn Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Jefferson St (NS) at Jefferson St (NS) at Eisenhower Dr (EW) Avenue 50 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) Avenida La Fonda (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) Avenue 50 (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) ov t27 mN t632 vm t47 °�° t0 ^ o 'k 922 tDom t285 �Mv t567 M 00 w .-4-1M �5 n. 1. 1 -4-4W 4-32 In r10) Mom �65 ci N WD 10 �0 v M N vvOD �498 Ot ,D m Naiv �565 N c-I r14M 894 4) l 1* j2 4) l 1* j 258 4) l 1* j 51 4) 1 �* �0 � l �► �107 � l �► j458 � l �► r38 1�T�► 1120"' 28� �T/► 342� �T�► 0� �1T�► 266� 4) 192� �T�► 68� 4)T� 1—i 18� rn0N M 01 ci 0 111-+ 8� NtDN 00 121 —► 90� vino m'Tm 0 92� CT0)0 NN 274-+ r, tnN tD ID 5� 585-+ NO r1 tD00 122� 627—► 636� 01 r,N tD cri - vv O N rr nm urn NQ �I/_ W� E �� S Source: Kurtzman Associates, 2016 The Altum Group General Plan Build -out Without Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit �514-16 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-50 August 2016 WT ems. '' � .'` 4�. ��' �� ,.� � "�► a � s;!1 . ` F• t4 �fi Px�Y`kcal '•1..' at�ti �r'iirx 11�I �Ty u'`Cz{Wi K 4 �` \\� 1 C' �'Jl��¢� .. - `,�y q� ( .w _ F �.�5 •'Z � Te` <I,.l r�3'h� �'��. Y � 4. � e..�.f' � �. LLL; . ��ti ��4 . � � '.�� vRlr � e►: _ • eY`2rC�. - .�' ' s e4!`Yt lfM}� `�iV �—l� �,y-e.K.a�..f A1{�V'W •l��'� -pie*�^.,• S •• • � f ♦ iai' �ax *!>! { . roar ai ,-.J�++F•� 1alt`'r� ��IltJd�y , � >F'� - f t � Y ti S-o L a.e ♦' .'.2 • `Desert ''@� r. Ifni-� �i•smivi� ai 4al�samfk� r I .a ti ti; try (k .� 0 f .�dCt{im11dF41W0mlmYmxdd/t,� 1 �' . $ ua�wmq�pNmMrmmnvrer m NWtRRdt 10.8 1 . •1-29.3 _ ru t oy a°' get^y asssn�nm a`� - Ala — r ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-52 August 2016 978 Al 4`y Avenid Montezur Calle Sinaloa Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Ave Montezuma (EW) Avenue I. Legend ii •tll ,�. Reference i; La Quinta Village Build -Out Project Boundary Desert Club Drive La Fonda N M M .0 -0 3 a v m Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Ave Bermudas (NS) at Calle Sinaloa (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) 16 48 97 rNiNM �7 MNNO �94 NN-1 *--249 � 1 �► Am j 19 4) j 134 � 1 1* A01111111 j 207 282� T^ o?� oily 25� r'� 255� 0� �� 242� 31� "'�°�° Avenue 50 Avenue 52 rIt 7 Ave Bermudas (NS) at CII Sinaloa/Ave 52 (EW) t37 mkDLO *--230 .� 1 '* j222 6841 1 N 1 373-1� 3 Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Avenue 50 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) t87 t96 a,00� LnLna) 4-21 Cnu, NNIn 4-4 4) 1 4) 1 �► j 178 22 8� m�o 0—� 0� v1rn �o Desert Club Dr (NS) at Desert Club Dr (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Calle Tampico (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) Avenue 48 (EW) ��,^n 197 t61 ri av t279 ri w M 4-418 -qr,� 0 ri � +-424 0 ri oo �0 �1�0 j142 4 j�* j18 4)1�► j529 din 100 98-0'T4') 10 0 _�# Iq 'F0 436 2� �0 Ln 1345 1� 0—* 0 0)ry Ln Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Jefferson St (NS) at Jefferson St (NS) at Eisenhower Dr (EW) Avenue 50 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) Avenida La Fonda (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) Avenue 50 (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) �N t14 mri t605 r`m t91 a t0 m n t 949 0�m t461 ooNio t568 01 � ri 0o.-iN 4-3 u1 N Ln 1:T1HN F137 io 0 rn en,1M �75 Ol 0 00r10 �0 N 0) N0000 �276 N � In MriM �568 OEM � 605 4) l 1► j2 4) ► j233 4) l 1► j70 4) l 1► *-0 4) l 1* j39 4) l '► j293 4) -60 1155"' �T�► 8? �T/► 722�' 4)T(► 0� 4)T(► 746* 4)1(11 199---" 4)1(11 111s 4)T(► 3 —i 10� v N w N to 32 —► 3� r, N � ci u) 00 82 —► 67� to N 0) ct Ln Ln 0 -+ 46� M r` 0 r` Ln 629 -+ :t ut oo rn .-+ 15� 384 -+ 50� oo rn m Ln � Ln 607 —► 634� r` ri oo ct vi ko 00 iN c -4 v2 Jri vko Source: Kurtzman Associates, 2016 The Altum Group General Plan Build -out With Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report N W-9E S S. Exhibit �914-18 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-54 August 2016 •:I, Avenue 48 Legend © = Intersection Reference No. --- = La Quinta Village Build -Out Project Boundary Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Avenue 50 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) Arno t126 cN1r^ t104 i\a + 00^.1 4-18 o1.0rn *__0 j i,► -83 4 j 10, j370 0 y- o ' 1 3 c 18� NLr1n 0—► 1N c 134LU AC Avenue 50 Desert Club Drive I r Calle Tampico 0 a Avenid Montezum AAvenida La Fonda Avenue 52 /ram -- I Calle - a Sinaloa- M ro -a -a a m Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Eisenhower Dr (NS) at Ave Bermudas (NS) at Ave Bermudas (NS) at Desert Club Dr (NS) at Desert Club Dr (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Ave Montezuma (EW) Calle Sinaloa (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) CII Sinaloa/Ave 52 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) Avenue 48 (EW) m0 t58 olv t99 0 t165 00� t68 00 0 � 176 ^ t108 �1O 'C259 000 r100 CO lD LnNln to OONLn Ln N �737 r-1001 �892 ONE 4-0 ^00 �31 �� 183 ^rn� �406 .--IN Ln �502 4) -69 4) -353 4) 1 '► j-305 4) 1 i► ,F439 4) 1 '► j267 4) 1 '► j-12 4) -952 • lk 222-"r1t 45t 49t 93141 t 90" 4l t 751 4) 3�001n 163omm 262-* r,01v 186� IDN-1 551��LO 507� 0LTD00-1* �ol rT-oo miD -1 ulo lD 00 N of dM d of 130Ln 0vr1 51N 6ro 13N 0 0r.r, Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Washington St (NS) at Jefferson St (NS) at Jefferson St (NS) at Eisenhower Dr (EW) Avenue 50 (EW) Calle Tampico (EW) Avenida La Fonda (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) Avenue 50 (EW) Avenue 52 (EW) on t27 oN t632 ulm t47 r- t0 r, r" 'k986 00om t285 ulrNv t567 M . 1 l0 ^ Ln �--I N . 101 ci N V M 00 rn lD M In In N .-+NM 4-5 �.-1W �34 00�M �144 "01-10 *--0 vv00 4558 Mr1CT +--631 Nor» *--974 4) 1 1* j 2 4) 1 1* j384 1 �► 1-51 1� �0 4) 1 1* ft �107 4) l� j458 4) 1� �38 1120-- 1�t 20' �T�► 792� 4)T(11 0� 2 4)T(► 253-�' 4)T(11 711 4)T(01 1-i 1nr,N 113-+ NootD 211--i� ro Lno 000000 334-+ r,1nN 650-* Nm-1 701-► mr,N M 01 c-I M ZT tntt01 N00 ID ID 1D00 0010 18� M 8� ooLn 149� -10 95� N 5� 122--j, r11nM 681--j, orn1 N �,5zhpkW E S Source: Kurtzman Associates, 2016 The Altum Group General Plan Build -out With Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit �1.14-19 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-56 August 2016 •:. ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION General Plan Build -out Without Project Traffic Volumes To derive General Plan Build -out Without Project traffic volumes, the City of La Quinta Traffic Model was used as previously described. Exhibit 5.14-14, General Plan Build -out Without Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes, Exhibit 5.14- 15, General Plan Build -out Without Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes, and Exhibit 5.14-16, General Plan Build -out Without Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes, all show General Plan Build -out intersection volumes without traffic associated with the proposed project. General Plan Build -out With Project Traffic Volumes To derive General Plan Build -out With Project traffic volumes, project trips were added to General Plan Build -out Without Project traffic volumes. Exhibit 5.14-17, General Plan Build -out With Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes, Exhibit 5.14-18, General Plan Build -out With Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes, and Exhibit 5.14-19, General Plan Build -out With Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes, all show General Plan Build -out intersection volumes with traffic associated with the proposed project. Future Levels of Service Existing Plus Project Levels of Service Table 5.14-8, Existing Plus Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis shows the roadway segment capacity analysis for Existing Plus Project traffic conditions based on existing lane geometry. As shown in Table 5.14-8, the study area roadway segments are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service for Existing Plus Project traffic conditions. Therefore, the proposed project is forecast to result in no significant traffic impacts at the TIA study area roadway segments for Existing Plus Project traffic conditions. Table 5.14-9, Existing Plus Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service shows intersection delay and Level of Service for Existing Plus Project traffic conditions based on existing lane geometry. As shown in Table 5.14-9, the TIA study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours for Existing Plus Project traffic conditions. Therefore, the proposed project is forecast to result in no significant traffic impacts at the TIA study intersections for Existing Plus Project traffic conditions. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-57 August 2016 983 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Table 5.14-8 Existing Plus Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis Roadway Segment Roadway Section Maximum Daily Capacity Average Daily Traffic Volume Volume to Capacity (V/C) Ratio Level of Service Eisenhower Drive North of Avenue 50 4D 42,600 17,000 0.40 A Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 4D 42,600 14,100 0.33 A Calle Tampico to Avenida Montezuma 4D 42,600 15,400 0.36 A Avenida Montezuma to Calle Sinaloa 4D 42,600 12,300 0.29 A Avenida Bermudas Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 2D 19,000 11,300 0.59 A Desert Club Drive Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 2U 14,000 6,900 0.49 A Washington Street Avenue 48 to Eisenhower Drive 6D 61,100 51,300 0.84 D Eisenhower Drive to Avenue 50 6D 61,100 39,200 0.64 B Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 6D 61,100 39,800 0.65 B Calle Tampico to Avenida La Fonda 6D 61,100 16,700 0.27 A Avenida La Fonda to Avenue 52 6D 61,100 14,700 0.24 A Jefferson Street Avenue 50 to Avenue 52 6D 61,100 19,600 0.32 A Avenue 50 Eisenhower Drive to Washington Street 4D 42,600 3,000 0.07 A Washington Street to Jefferson Street 4D 42,600 15,100 0.35 A Calle Tampico Eisenhower Drive to Avenida Bermudas 4D 42,600 10,300 0.24 A Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club Drive 4D 42,600 17,900 0.42 A Desert Club Drive to Washington Street 4D 42,600 37,500 0.88 D Avenida La Fonda West of Washington Street 2U 14,000 1,500 0.11 A Calle Sinaloa Eisenhower Drive to Avenida Bermudas 4D 42,600 9,900 0.23 A Avenue 52 Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club Drive 4D 42,600 16,500 0.39 A Desert Club Drive to Washington Street 4D 42,600 17,700 0.42 A Washington Street to Jefferson Street 4D 42,600 15,800 0.37 A Source: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan, Study Intersections Table 5, Kunzman Associates Inc., May27, 2016. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-58 August 2016 984 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Table 5.14-9 Existing Plus Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service Intersection Jurisdiction' Traffic Contro13 Peak Hour Delay-LOS2 Morning Evening Eisenhower Drive (NS) at: Avenue 50 (EW) - #1 LQ TS 17.5-13 23.9-C 24.1-C 10.0-A 20.6-C 30.8-C 19.6-C 8.4-A Calle Tampico (EW) - #2 LQ TS Avenida Montezuma (EW) - #3 LQ AWS Calle Sinaloa (EW) - #4 LQ RBT Avenida Bermudas (NS) at: Calle Tampico (EW) - #5 LQ TS 27.6-C 46.8D 27.2-C 35.5-D Calle Sinaloa/Avenue 52 (EW) - #6 LQ TS Desert Club Drive (NS) at: Calle Tampico (EW) - #7 LQ TS 40.7-D 11.9-13 39.0-D 18.9-13 Avenue 52 (EW) - #8 LQ TS Washington Street (NS) at: Avenue 48 (EW) - #9 LQ TS 27.8-C 24.2-C 28.5-C 30.0-C 20.2-C 23.7-C 19.8-13 20.4-C 23.2-C 33.4-C 21.1-C 25.1-C Eisenhower Drive (EW) - #10 LQ TS Avenue 50 (EW) - #11 LQ TS Calle Tampico (EW) - #12 LQ TS Avenida La Fonda (EW) - #13 LQ CSS Avenue 52 (EW) - #14 LQ TS Jefferson Street (NS) at: Avenue 50 (EW) - #15 LQ/I TS 34.6-C 7.4-A 34.8-C 8.6-A Avenue 52 (EW) - #16 LQ RBT Source: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan, Study Intersections Table 6, Kunzman Associates Inc., May 2016. Notes: 1. When a right turn lane is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; d = De Facto Right Turn; > = Right Turn Overlap; >> = Free Right Turn 2. Intersection delay and Level of Service (LOS) has been calculated using the following analysis software: Traffix, Version 7.9.0215 and HCS 2010. Per the Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal, all way stop, and roundabout yield controls. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. 3. TS = Traffic Signal; AWS = All Way Stop; RBT = Roundabout; CSS = Cross Street Stop Interim Year Without Project Levels of Service Table 5.14-10, Interim Year Without Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis shows the roadway segment capacity analysis for Interim Year Without Project traffic conditions based on existing lane geometry. As shown in Table 5.14-10, the study area roadway segments are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service for Interim Year Without Project traffic conditions. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-59 August 2016 985 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Table 5.14-10 Interim Year Without Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis Volume Average to Maximum Daily Capacity Level Roadway Daily Traffic (V/C) of Roadway Segment Section Capacity Volume Ratio Service North of Avenue 50 4D 42,600 18,200 0.43 A Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 4D 42,600 14,200 0.33 A Eisenhower Calle Tampico to Avenida Drive Montezuma 4D 42,600 12,800 0.30 A Avenida Montezuma to Calle Sinaloa 4D 42,600 9,800 0.23 A Avenida Bermudas Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 2D 19,000 4,100 0.22 A Desert Club Drive Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 2U 14,000 2,700 0.19 A Avenue 48 to Eisenhower Drive 6D 61,100 52,500 0.86 D Eisenhower Drive to Avenue 50 6D 61,100 36,400 0.60 A Washington Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 6D 61,100 31,800 0.52 A Street Calle Tampico to Avenida La Fonda 6D 61,100 21,800 0.36 A Avenida La Fonda to Avenue 52 6D 61,100 19,600 0.32 A Jefferson Street Avenue 50 to Avenue 52 6D 61,100 26,600 0.44 A Eisenhower Dr to Washington St 4D 42,600 4,500 0.11 A Avenue 50 Washington St to Jefferson St 4D 42,600 17,800 0.42 A Eisenhower Drive to Avenida Bermudas 4D 42,600 4,600 0.11 A Calle Tampico Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club Dr 4D 42,600 8,100 0.19 A Desert Club Drive to Washington St. 4D 42,600 18,800 0.44 A Avenida La Fonda West of Washington Street 2U 14,000 1,500 0.11 A Eisenhower Dr to Avenida Calle Sinaloa Bermudas 4D 42,600 6,400 0.15 A Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club Avenue 52 Dr 4D 42,600 16,900 0.40 A Desert Club Dr to Washington St 4D 42,600 18,100 0.42 A Washington St to Jefferson St 4D 42,600 18,700 0.44 A Source: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan, Study Intersections Table 7, Kunzman Associates Inc., May 2016. Table 5.14-11, Interim Year Without Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service, shows intersection delay and Level of Service for Interim Year Without Project traffic conditions based on existing lane geometry. As shown in Table 5.14-11, the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours for Interim Year Without Project traffic conditions, with the exception of the following study areas: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-60 August 2016 BUT ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION • Washington Street/Avenida La Fonda (#13) (LOS E during the evening peak hour); and • Jefferson Streeet/Avenue 52 (#16) (LOS F during both morning and evening peak hours). Table 5.14-11 Interim Year Without Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service Peak Hour Traffic Delay -LOSS Intersection Jurisdiction' Control' Morning Evening Eisenhower Drive (NS) at: Avenue 50 (EW) - #1 LQ TS 18.8-B 22.8-C Calle Tampico (EW) - #2 LQ TS 22.5-C 28.5-C Avenida Montezuma (EW) - #3 LQ AWS 23.2-C 16.2-C Calle Sinaloa (EW) - #4 LQ RBT 8.8-A 6.6-A Avenida Bermudas (NS) at: Calle Tampico (EW) - #5 LQ TS 27.3-C 26.6-C Calle Sinaloa/Avenue 52 (EW) - #6 LQ TS 45.6-D 29.7-C Desert Club Drive (NS) at: Calle Tampico (EW) - #7 LQ TS 35.1-D 32.9-C Avenue 52 (EW) - #8 LQ TS 10.7-B 14.3-B Washington Street (NS) at: Avenue 48 (EW) - #9 LQ TS 29.8-C 19.6-B Eisenhower Drive (EW) - #10 LQ TS 25.5-C 21.8-C Avenue 50 (EW) - #11 LQ TS 32.3-C 27.6-C Calle Tampico (EW) - #12 LQ TS 25.0-C 25.5-C Avenida La Fonda (EW) - #13 LQ CSS 32.5-D 41.2-E Avenue 52 (EW) - #14 LQ TS 28.0-C 25.4-C Jefferson Street (NS) at: Avenue 50 (EW) - #15 LQ/1 TS 38.2-D 38.2-D Avenue 52 (EW) - #16 LQ RBT 53.0-F 144.0-F Source: La Quints Village Build -out Plan, Study Intersections Table 8, Kunzman Associates Inc., May 2016. Notes: 1. LQ = City of La Quinta; City of Indio 2. TS = Traffic Signal; AWS = All Way Stop; RBT = Roundabout; CSS = Cross Street Stop 3. Intersection delay and Level of Service (LOS) has been calculated using the following analysis software: Traffix, Version 7.9.0215 and HCS 2010. Per the Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal, all way stop, and roundabout yield controls. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. Interim Year With Project Levels of Service Table 5.14-12, Interim Year With Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis, shows the roadway segment capacity analysis for Interim Year With Project traffic conditions based on existing lane geometry. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-61 August 2016 987 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Table 5.14-12 Interim Year With Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis Roadway Segment Roadway Section Maximum Daily Capacity Average Daily Traffic Volume Volume to Capacity (V/C) Ratio Level of Service Eisenhower Drive North of Avenue 50 4D 42,600 18,400 0.43 A Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 4D 42,600 14,400 0.34 A Calle Tampico to Avenida Montezuma 4D 42,600 13,300 0.31 A Avenida Montezuma to Calle Sinaloa 4D 42,600 10,200 0.24 A Avenida Bermudas Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 2D 19,000 5,300 0.28 A Desert Club Drive Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 2U 14,000 3,500 0.25 A Washington Street Avenue 48 to Eisenhower Drive 6D 61,100 54,100 0.89 D Eisenhower Drive to Avenue SO 6D 61,100 38,300 0.63 B Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 6D 61,100 34,300 0.56 A Calle Tampico to Avenida La Fonda 6D 61,100 22,100 0.36 A Avenida La Fonda to Avenue 52 6D 61,100 19,900 0.33 A Jefferson Street Avenue 50 to Avenue 52 6D 61,100 26,600 0.44 A Avenue 50 Eisenhower Drive to Washington Street 4D 42,600 4,500 0.11 A Washington Street to Jefferson Street 4D 42,600 18,500 0.43 A Calle Tampico Eisenhower Drive to Avenida Bermudas 4D 42,600 5,500 0.13 A Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club Drive 4D 42,600 9,700 0.23 A Desert Club Drive to Washington Street 4D 42,600 21,900 0.51 A Avenida La Fonda West of Washington Street 2U 14,000 1,500 0.11 A Calle Sinaloa Eisenhower Drive to Avenida Bermudas 4D 42,600 7,000 0.16 A Avenue 52 Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club Drive 4D 42,600 17,200 0.40 A Desert Club Drive to Washington Street 4D 42,600 18,400 0.43 A Washington Street to Jefferson Street 4D 42,600 19,300 0.45 A Avenida La Fonda West of Washington Street 2U 14,000 1,500 0.11 A Calle Sinaloa Eisenhower Drive to Avenida Bermudas 4D 42,600 7,000 0.16 A Avenue 52 Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club Drive 4D 42,600 17,200 0.40 A Desert Club Drive to Washington Street 4D 42,600 18,400 0.43 A Washington Street to Jefferson Street 4D 42,600 19,300 0.45 A Source: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan, Study Intersections Table 9, Kunzman Associates Inc. May 2016. As shown in Table 5.14-12, the study area roadway segments are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service for Interim Year With Project traffic conditions. Therefore, the proposed project is forecast to result in no significant traffic impacts at the study area roadway segments for Interim Year With Project traffic conditions. Table 5.14-13, Interim Year With Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service shows intersection delay and Level of Service for Interim Year With Project traffic conditions based on existing lane geometry. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-62 August 2016 •:: ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Table 5.14-13 Interim Year With Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service Intersection Jurisdiction' Traffic ControI2 Peak Hour Delay-LOS' Morning Evening Eisenhower Drive (NS) at: Avenue 50 (EW) - #1 LQ TS 18.8-B 22.7-C Calle Tampico (EW) - #2 LQ TS 22.7-C 28.8-C Avenida Montezuma (EW) - #3 LQ AWS 23.8-C 16.9-C Calle Sinaloa (EW) - #4 LQ RBT 9.1-A 6.9-A Avenida Bermudas (NS) at: Calle Tampico (EW) - #5 LQ TS 27.3-C 26.7-C Calle Sinaloa/Avenue 52 (EW) - #6 LQ TS 45.6-D 30.7-C Desert Club Drive (NIS) at: Calle Tampico (EW) - #7 LQ TS 35.5-D 33.6-C Avenue 52 (EW) - #8 LQ TS 11.0-B 15.1-B Washington Street (NIS) at: Avenue 48 (EW) - #9 LQ TS 31.5-C 19.7-B Eisenhower Drive (EW) - #10 LQ TS 25.7-C 21.9-C Avenue 50 (EW) - #11 LQ TS 32.7-C 27.6-C Calle Tampico (EW) - #12 LQ TS 26.3-C 26.6-C Avenida La Fonda (EW) - #13 LQ CSS 32.8-D 42.9-E With Mitigation LQ CSS 11.5-13 11.2-13 Avenue 52 (EW) - #14 LQ TS 28.2-C 25.4-C Jefferson Street (NS) at: Avenue 50 (EW) - #15 LQ/1 TS 37.7-D 38.8-D Avenue 52 (EW) - #16 LQ RBT 55.1-F 149.9-F - With Mitigation LQ RBT 6.7-A 11.2-13 Source: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan, Study Intersections Table 10, Kunzman Associates Inc., May 2016. Notes: 1. LQ = City of La Quinta; I = City of Indio 2. TS = Traffic Signal; AWS = All Way Stop; RBT = Roundabout; CSS = Cross Street Stop 3. Intersection delay and Level of Service (LOS) has been calculated using the following analysis software: Traffix, Version 7.9.0215 and HCS 2010. Per the Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal, all way stop, and roundabout yield controls. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. Table 5.14-13 shows that the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable levels of service during the peak hours for Interim Year With Project traffic conditions, with the exception of the following Intersections: • Washington Street/Avenida La Fonda (#13) (LOS E during the evening peak hour); and • Jefferson Street/Avenue 52 intersection (#16) (LOS F during the morning and evening peak hours). La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-63 August 2016 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION As shown in Table 5.14-13, the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable levels of service during the peak hours for Interim Year With Project traffic conditions, with implementation of Mitigation Measures CIR-1 and CIR-2. Therefore, the proposed project is forecast to result in no significant traffic impacts at the study intersections for Interim Year With Project traffic conditions, with implementation of Mitigation Measures CIR-1 and CIR-2. General Plan Build -out Without Project Levels of Service Table 5.14-14, General Plan Build -out Without Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis, shows the roadway segment capacity analysis for General Plan Build -out Without Project traffic conditions based on the roadway improvements identified in the General Plan Circulation Element. As shown in Table 5.14-14, the study area roadway segments are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service for General Plan Build -out Without Project traffic conditions, with the exception of Washington Street between Avenue 48 and Eisenhower Drive which is forecast to operate at Level of Service E. Table 5.4-14 General Plan Build -out Without Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis Roadway Segment Roadway Section Maximum Daily Capacity Ca Average Daily Traffic Traffic Volume Volume to Capacity V C ) Ratio LOS Eisenhower North of Avenue 50 4D 42,600 21,400 0.50 A Drive Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 4D 42,600 15,300 0.36 A Calle Tampico to Avenida Montezuma 4D 42,600 14,000 0.33 A Avenida Montezuma to Calle Sinaloa 4D 42,600 10,500 0.25 A Avenida Bermudas Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 2D 19,000 4,100 0.22 A Desert Club Drive Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 2U 14,000 2,700 0.19 A Washington Avenue 48 to Eisenhower Dr 6D 61,100 58,300 0.95 E Street Eisenhower Dr to Avenue 50 6D 61,100 41,400 0.68 B Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 6D 61,100 36,200 0.59 A Calle Tampico to Avenida La Fonda 6D 61,100 27,400 0.45 A Avenida La Fonda to Avenue 52 6D 61,100 25,000 0.41 A Jefferson St Avenue 50 to Avenue 52 6D 61,100 35,100 0.57 A Avenue 50 Eisenhower Dr to Washington St 4D 42,600 4,500 0.11 A Washington St to Jefferson St 4D 42,600 17,800 0.42 A Calle Eisenhower Dr to Avenida Bermudas 4D 42,600 5,300 0.12 A Tampico Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club Dr 4D 42,600 10,300 0.24 A Desert Club Dr to Washington St 4D 42,600 19,800 0.46 A La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-64 August 2016 M ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Table 5.4-14 General Plan Build -out Without Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis (continued) Volume Maximum Average to Roadway Daily Roadway Segment Daily Capacity LOS Section Capacity Traffic (V/Q Volume Ratio Avenida La West of Washington St 2U 14,000 1,500 0.11 A Fonda Calle Sinaloa Eisenhower Dr to Avenida Bermudas 4D 42,600 6,400 0.15 A Avenue 52 Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club Dr 4D 42,600 16,900 0.40 A Desert Club Dr to Washington St 4D 42,600 18,100 0.42 A Washington Street to Jefferson Street 4D 42,600 31,800 0.75 C Source: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan, Study Intersections Table 11, Kunzman Associates Inc., May 2016. Table 5.15-15, General Plan Build -out Without Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service shows intersection delay and levels of service for General Plan Build -out Without Project traffic conditions based on the roadway improvements identified in the General Plan Circulation Element. As shown in Table 5.15-15, the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable levels of service during the peak hours for General Plan Build -out Without Project traffic conditions. Table 5.14-15 General Plan Build -out Without Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service Intersection Jurisdiction' Traffic Control Z Peak Hour Delay -LOSS Morning Evening Eisenhower Drive (NS) at: Avenue 50 (EW) - #1 LQ TS 17.4-B 22.9-C Calle Tampico (EW) - #2 LQ TS 16.4-B 20.0-C Avenida Montezuma (EW) - #3 LQ AWS 16.6-C 34.4-D Calle Sinaloa (EW) - #4 LQ RBT 8.4-A 8.7-A Avenida Bermudas (NS) at: Calle Tampico (EW) - #5 LQ TS 24.3-C 22.1-C Calle Sinaloa/Avenue 52 (EW) - #6 LQ TS 41.1-D 25.2-C Desert Club Drive (NS) at: Calle Tampico (EW) - #7 LQ TS 34.1-C 32.0-C Avenue 52 (EW) - #8 LQ TS 8.8-A 10.5-B Washington Street (NS) at: Avenue 48 (EW) - #9 LQ TS 24.2-C 22.6-C Eisenhower Drive (EW) - #10 LQ TS 23.8-C 25.6-C Avenue 50 (EW) - #11 LQ TS 20.2-C 27.0-C La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-65 August 2016 991 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Table 5.14-15 General Plan Build -out Without Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service (continued) Intersection Jurisdiction) Traffic Contro12 Peak Hour Delay-LOS' Calle Tampico (EW) - #12 LQ TS 18.1-13 22.0-C Avenida La Fonda (EW) - #13 LQ CSS 11.4-B 12.5-B Avenue 52 (EW) - #14 LQ TS 48.0-D 34.6-C Jefferson Street (INS) at: Avenue 50 (EW) - #15 LQ/1 TS 33.8-C 38.0-D Avenue 52 (EW) - #16 LQ RBT 6.5-A 25.8-D Source: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan, Study Intersections Table 12, Kunzman Associates Inc., May 27, 2016. Notes: 1. LQ = La Quinta; City of Indio 2. TS = Traffic Signal; AWS = All Way Stop; RBT = Roundabout; CSS = Cross Street Stop 3.Intersection delay and Level of Service (LOS) has been calculated using the following analysis software: Traffix, Version 7.9.0215 and HCS 2010. Per the Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal, all way stop, and roundabout yield controls. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. General Plan Build -out With Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service Table 5.14-16, General Plan Build -out With Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis shows the roadway segment capacity analysis for General Plan Build -out With Project traffic conditions based on the roadway improvements identified in the General Plan Circulation Element. Table 5.14-16 shows that the study area roadway segments are projected to operate within acceptable levels of service for General Plan Build -out With Project traffic conditions, with the exception of the following roadway segments: • Washington Street between Avenue 48 and Eisenhower Drive (LOS F); and • Calle Tampico between Desert Club Drive and Washington Street (LOS Q. Table 5.14-16 General Plan Build -out With Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis Maximum Average Volume to Level Roadway Daily Capacity Roadway Segment Section Daily Traffic (V/C) of Capacity Volume Ratio Service Eisenhower North of Avenue 50 4D 42,600 22,800 0.54 A Drive Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 4D 42,600 16,800 0.39 A Calle Tampico to Avenida 4D 42,600 16,900 0.40 A Montezuma La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-66 August 2016 .., ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Table 5.14-16 General Plan Build -out With Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis (continued) Roadway Segment Roadway Section Maximum Daily Capacity Average Daily Traffic Volume Volume to Capacity (V/Q Ratio Level of Service Avenida Montezuma to Calle Sinaloa 4D 42,600 13,000 0.31 A Avenida Bermudas Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 2D 19,000 11,300 0.59 A Desert Club Drive Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 2U 14,000 7,400 0.53 A Washington Avenue 48 to Eisenhower Drive 6D 61,100 68,600 1.12 F Street Eisenhower Drive to Avenue 50 6D 61,100 53,100 0.87 D Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 6D 61,100 51,900 0.85 D Calle Tampico to Avenida La Fonda 6D 61,100 29,300 0.48 A Avenida La Fonda to Avenue 52 6D 61,100 27,000 0.44 A Jefferson Street Avenue 50 to Avenue 52 6D 61,100 35,200 0.58 A Avenue 50 Eisenhower Drive to Washington St. 4D 42,600 4,600 0.11 A Washington Street to Jefferson St. 4D 42,600 21,900 0.51 A Calle Eisenhower Drive to Avenida Bermudas 4D 42,600 10,800 0.25 A Tampico Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club Dr. 4D 42,600 20,500 0.48 A Desert Club Drive to Washington St. 4D 42,600 39,400 0.92 E Avenida La Fonda West of Washington Street 2U 14,000 1,600 0.11 A Calle Sinaloa Eisenhower Drive to Avenida Bermudas 4D 42,600 10,100 0.24 A Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club Dr. 4D 42,600 18,600 0.44 A Desert Club Drive to Washington St. 4D 42,600 20,100 0.47 A Avenue 52 Washington Street to Jefferson St. 4D 42,600 35,800 0.84 D Source: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan, Study Intersections Table 13, Kunzman Associates Inc., May 2016. Improvements that would help reduce, but not fully mitigate, the identified roadway segment impacts are discussed in the following section regarding the Village Build -out Plan Circulation Plan. Since the roadway segment impacts would not be fully mitigated, the proposed project is forecast to result in a potentially significant and unavoidable traffic impact at Washington Street between Avenue 48 and Eisenhower Drive and Calle Tampico between Desert Club Drive and Washington Street for General Plan Buildout With Project conditions. As noted in the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element: intersections are the ultimate arbiters of roadway capacity, being generally the most constraining and defining portions of roadway network. Based on the acceptable intersection levels of service during the peak hours at the two endpoints of Washington Street/Avenue 48 and Washington Street/Eisenhower Drive, it is likely that La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-67 August 2016 993 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION the daily roadway segment capacity will be adequate for Washington Street between Avenue 48 and Eisenhower Drive. Similarly, based on the acceptable intersection levels of service during the peak hours at the two endpoints of Avenida Bermudas/Calle Tampico and Washington Street/Calle Tampico, it is likely that the daily roadway segment capacity will be adequate for Calle Tampico between Desert Club Drive and Washington Street. Table 5.14-17, General Plan Build -out With Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service, shows intersection delay and levels of service for General Plan Build -out With Project traffic conditions based on the roadway improvements identified in the General Plan Circulation Element. Table 5.14-17 shows that the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable levels of service during the peak hours for General Plan Build -out With Project traffic conditions, with the exception of: • Eisenhower Drive/Avenida Montezuma intersection (LOS F) The following Mitigation Measures is recommended for General Plan Build -out With Project traffic conditions: CIR-3 Eisenhower Drive/Avenida Montezuma (#3): Convert Eisenhower Drive/Avenida Montezuma from an all -way stop control to a yield -controlled roundabout [this improvement is assumed in the Village Buildout Circulation Plan]. As shown in Table 5.14-17, the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable levels of service during the peak hours for General Plan Build -out With Project traffic conditions, with implementation of the currently adopted General Plan Circulation Element improvements and with implementation of Mitigation Measure CIR-3. Therefore, the proposed project is forecast to result in no significant traffic impacts at the study intersections for General Plan Build -out With Project traffic conditions, with implementation of Mitigation Measure CIR-3. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-68 August 2016 994 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Table 5.14-17 General Plan Build -out With Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service With Mitigation Intersection Jurisdiction' Peak Hour Traffic Delay-LOS3 Control' Morning Evening Eisenhower Drive (NS) at: Avenue 50 (EW) - #1 LQ TS 17.2-13 22.4-C Calle Tampico (EW) - #2 LQ TS 18.2-13 23.2-C Avenida Montezuma (EW) - #3 LQ AWS 18.3-C 55.1-F - With Mitigation LQ RBT 6.6-A 14.1-13 Calle Sinaloa (EW) - #4 LQ RBT 10.1-13 13.3-13 Avenida Bermudas (NS) at: Calle Tampico (EW) - #5 LQ TS 26.1-C 25.3-C Calle Sinaloa/Avenue 52 (EW) - #6 LQ TS 46.7-D 31.4-C Desert Club Drive (NS) at: Calle Tampico (EW) - #7 LQ TS 38.6-D 38.0-D Avenue 52 (EW) - #8 LQ TS 10.3-13 14.3-13 Washington Street (NS) at: Avenue 48 (EW) - #9 LQ TS 38.2-D 32.4-C Eisenhower Drive (EW) - #10 LQ TS 25.7-C 27.3-C Avenue 50 (EW) - #11 LQ TS 20.0-C 36.3-D Calle Tampico (EW) - #12 LQ TS 27.0-C 32.6-C Avenida La Fonda (EW) - #13 LQ CSS 11.8-13 12.8-13 Avenue 52 (EW) - #14 LQ TS 52.0-D 38.3-11D Jefferson Street (NS) at: Avenue 50 (EW) - #15 LQ/I TS 35.4-D 40.5-D Avenue 52 (EW) - #16 LQ L RBT 6.7-A 29.0-D Source: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan, Study Intersections Table 14, Kunzman Associates Inc., May 2016. Notes: 1. LQ = La Quinta; City of Indio 2. TS = Traffic Signal; AWS = All Way Stop; RBT = Roundabout; CSS = Cross Street Stop 3. Intersection delay and Level of Service (LOS) has been calculated using the following analysis software: Traffix, Version 7.9.0215 and HCS 2010. Per the Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal, all way stop, and roundabout yield controls. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-69 August 2016 995 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Exclusive Turn Lane Recommendations The City's traffic study guidelines recommend dual left -turn lanes where the movement is forecast to exceed 250 vehicles per peak hour and exclusive right -turn lanes where the movement is forecast to exceed 200 vehicles per peak hour. Based on these criteria, five circulation improvements are recommended for the current General Plan Circulation Network in addition to the roadway improvements identified in the current General Plan Circulation Element for the project area and vicinity. Note: the recommended improvements for the Avenida Bermudas/Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive/Calle Tampico intersections may not be feasible in light of existing development at these intersections. The Village Build -out Plan TIA recommended alternative solutions to these two intersections. These are discussed below in the Preferred Village Build -out Circulation Plan section. • Eisenhower Drive/Calle Tampico (#2): Construct one additional westbound left -turn lane to provide dual left -turn lanes. • Avenida Bermudas/Calle Tampico (#5): Construct one additional westbound left -turn lane. • Desert Club Drive/Calle Tampico (#7): Construct one exclusive northbound right -turn lane and one additional westbound left -turn lane. • Washington Street/Avenue 48 (#9): Construct one exclusive northbound right -turn lane. • Washington Street/Avenue 52 (#14): Construct one additional eastbound left -turn lane to provide triple left -turn lanes. Provide one additional southbound left -turn lane to provide triple left -turn lanes. These recommendations are not required based on the City's level of service and thresholds of significance criteria, but are recommended as mitigation in accordance with the City's traffic study guidelines. It should be noted, exclusive lane improvements may not be feasible at the following intersections due to right-of-way constraints: Eisenhower Drive/Calle Tampico (#2), Eisenhower Drive/Avenida Montezuma (#3), Avenida Bermudas/Calle Tampico (#5), Desert Club Drive/Calle Tampico (#7). Part of the vision for the Village Build -out Plan is to provide enhanced multi -modal facilities that encourage alternative modes of transportation such as walking, bicycling, Neighborhood Electric Vehicles (NEV) or golf carts, and transit. Slowing vehicle travel speeds while maintaining traffic flow and providing a walkable environment are key elements of a successful and vibrant downtown. Exhibit 5.14-20, Village Build -out Plan Circulation Plan, shows an aerial image of the proposed Circulation Plan. As shown, the proposed Circulation Plan includes modifications to the existing roadway network that would contribute to a multi -modal environment and directly affect the operations of the facilities analyzed in this study. These improvements would resolve the issue regarding the feasibility of creating additional lanes on Calle Tampico and its intersections with La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-70 August 2016 .., ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Avenida Bermudas and Desert Club Drive. The improvements are listed on the following page in Village Build -out Circulation Plan. Preferred Village Build -out Circulation Plan Part of the City's vision for the Village Build -out Plan is to provide enhanced multi -modal facilities that encourage alternative modes of transportation such as walking, bicycling, golf cart and transit. Neighborhood Electric Vehicles (NEV) are also part of the plan, however, because these vehicles can go at least 25 miles per hour, they may be driven in the travel lanes rather than in combined bike/golf cart lanes. Slowing vehicle travel speeds while maintaining traffic flow and providing a walkable environment are key elements of a successful and vibrant downtown. Village Buildout Circulation Plan Exhibit 5.4-20, Village Build -out Circulation Plan, shows an aerial image of the proposed Village Buildout Circulation Plan. The exhibit shows that the proposed Circulation Plan includes the following modifications to the existing roadway network that would contribute to a multi -modal environment and directly affect the operations of the facilities analyzed in this study: • Conversion of Eisenhower Drive/Calle Tampico from a traffic signal control to a yield - controlled roundabout; • Conversion of Eisenhower Drive/Avenida Montezuma from an all -way stop control to a yield - controlled roundabout; • Conversion of Avenida Bermudas/Calle Tampico from a traffic signal control to a yield controlled roundabout; • Conversion of Avenida Bermudas/Calle Sinaloa from a traffic signal control to a yield controlled roundabout (with a northbound right -turn bypass lane); • Conversion of Desert Club Drive/Calle Tampico from a traffic signal control to a yield - controlled roundabout; • Modification of Eisenhower Drive between Calle Tampico and Calle Sinaloa from two lanes in each direction to one lane in each direction; • Modification of Calle Tampico between Eisenhower Drive and Desert Club Drive from two lanes in each direction to one lane in each direction; • Modification of Calle Sinaloa between Eisenhower Drive and Avenida Bermudas from two lanes in each direction to one lane in each direction; • Construct a raised median at Washington Street/Avenida La Fonda to restrict the eastbound left -turn movement; • Back -in parking on Calle Tampico between Avenida Bermudas and Desert Club Drive; and • Mid -block crosswalks at four locations along Calle Tampico and one location at Calle Sinaloa/Avenida Villa. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-71 August 2016 997 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-72 August 2016 .S ATTACH M ENT 1 y {{qq �► - _� Legend • jr] I I= Y zr 4t ound®Doan t-2 W i� 'E ! . M r11A Al uRA l.Ic4" �: ( +•^�' Dnam ?. 1 .. #1 �v*E E > l BM _ S W k r ��' ti� �� 1 �"'t � •� ., � „2 e Lhbfi" i'.//✓ff BadmParkmg I 5 °A— �} Pedestrian Cro65in7 _,. . 4 SIT 1I V � I, _} ny�'`' '+ � r � � I 7yrn I I i. ..� A��w f.� 4_�� • T '"J _.� a �Y .=vr� Uead End $i '1 ...� ••yy L iCsfla Nnlpal w r R r rE: q I a •' : _ W 1 ... _ F I , . ^ .+ -- - : - C.r'� x -s..`. {��y`[ P •'.W=NIIE-:i1��F f� 10 yyFu. � - - - ,r 3 + SO Source: Kunzman Associates, 2016 The Altum Group Village Build -Out Circulation Plan La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 5.14-20 99 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-74 August 2016 1000 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Properly designed modern roundabouts can reduce unnecessary traffic stops, traffic collisions, and vehicle speeds, while improving efficiency and overall multi -modal mobility. Final roundabout design considerations should include turning radius for large vehicles, approach deflection, bicycle/pedestrian accommodations, and right-of-way constraints. The proposed lane modifications would provide additional capacity for enhanced parkway facilities, on -street parking, and/or protected bicycle/NEV facilities. Additional circulation improvements include mini roundabouts along Avenida Bermudas near Calle Estado and additional sidewalk infrastructure throughout the project area. As a whole, the Village Build -out Plan Circulation Plan is likely to result in reduced vehicle speeds and provide the facilities necessary for a multi -modal and vibrant downtown environment within the Village. Exhibit 5.4-21, Example of Multi -Modal Street, shows an example of some of the possible features that could be implemented as a result of the proposed Village Build -out Circulation Plan. Levels of Service With Village Buildout Plan Circulation Plan General Plan Buildout With Project With Village Buildout Circulation Plan Roadway Segments Levels of Service Table 5.14-18, General Buildout With Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis (Village Buildout Circulation Plan), shows the roadway segment capacity analysis for General Plan Buildout With Project traffic conditions based on the Village Buildout Plan Circulation Plan. The table shows that the study area roadway segments are projected to operate within acceptable levels of service for General Plan Buildout With Project With Village Buildout Circulation Plan traffic conditions, with the exception of the following roadway segments: • Washington Street between Avenue 48 and Eisenhower Drive (LOS F); • Calle Tampico between Avenida Bermudas and Desert Club Drive (LOS E); • Calle Tampico between Desert Club Drive and Washington Street (LOS E). As previously noted, the forecast roadway segment deficiency at Washington Street between Avenue 48 and Eisenhower Drive is identified as a special focus area in the City's General Plan Circulation Element. Although roadway widening of Washington Street between Avenue 48 and Eisenhower Drive is not currently identified as a feasible improvement in the General Plan Circulation Element, the following mitigation measure would improve northbound traffic flow at the Washington Street/Avenue 48 intersection and lessen the project impact: CIR 4 Washington Street/Avenue 48 (#9): Construct the northbound approach to consist of three through lanes and one right -turn lane. Remove the pedestrian crosswalk at the north leg of the intersection. This is based on review of pedestrian access points to La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-75 August 2016 1001 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION surrounding land uses, removal of the crosswalk at the north leg of Washington Street/Avenue 48 is forecast to have no substantial impact on pedestrian circulation. As noted in the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element, "intersections are the ultimate arbiters of roadway capacity, being generally the most constraining and defining portions of roadway network." Based on the acceptable intersection Levels of Service during the peak hours at the two endpoints of Washington Street/Avenue 48 and Washington Street/Eisenhower Drive, it is possible that the daily roadway segment capacity will be adequate for Washington Street between Avenue 48 and Eisenhower Drive. Similarly, based on the acceptable intersection Levels of Service during the peak hours at the two endpoints of Avenida Bermudas/Calle Tampico and Washington Street/Calle Tampico it is possible that the daily roadway segment capacity will be adequate for Calle Tampico between Desert Club Drive and Washington Street. While additional Citywide Transportation Demand Management and Transportation Systems Management measures would effectively reduce traffic and improve operations, the significantly impacted roadway segments may still operate at a deficient level of service. Therefore, the proposed project is forecast to result in a potentially significant and unavoidable traffic impact at the following roadway segments for General Plan euildout With Project With Village euildout Circulation Plan conditions: • Washington Street between Avenue 48 and Eisenhower Drive; • Calle Tampico between Avenida Bermudas and Desert Club Drive; and • Calle Tampico between Desert Club Drive and Washington Street. At buildout and with improvements, all project area intersections would operate at LOS D or better with mitigation. However, roadway segments along Calle Tampico between Avenida Bermudas and Washington Street will operate at LOS E. It should be noted, LOS E at Calle Tampico roadway segments between Avenida Bermudas and Washington Street indicates the roadway is forecast to operate within capacity. Although LOS E indicates typically undesirable levels of congestion, the resulting decrease in vehicle speeds could be considered a benefit to other modes of travel. The City is committed to resolving traffic issues by finding solutions for the reduction on the number of vehicles entering the Village. Mitigation Measure CIR-10, provides the City with a means of studying Calle Tampico before roadway segments reach this critical capacity, and provide a mechanism to reduce the number of vehicles through implementation of Parking Demand Management strategies (see discussion in Section 5.10, Land Use, for a discussion of these strategies), and by adopting performance measures for bicycles and pedestrians as a means of quantifying performance for alternative modes of transportation within the Village boundary. With implementation of Mitigation Measure CIR-10, this impact would be less than significant. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-76 August 2016 1002 ,tom � "ram, � r� ,,, . � •, - - ,�: Parking t A .�: , , r J + r Roundabout e JAM * I r "�-h•*i.; M�5�4I.: .nag _ I... .. i�' ,.. ��. �, � 7. AL —. ko • `!Enhanced k ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-78 August 2016 1004 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Table 5.14-18 General Plan Buildout With Project Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis (Village Buildout Circulation Plan) Roadway Segment Roadway Section Maximum Daily Ca Capacity Average Daily Traffic Traffic Volume Volume to Capacity V C (� ) Ratio LOS North of Avenue 50 4D 42,600 24,300 0.57 A Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 4D 42,600 18,300 0.43 A Eisenhower Drive Calle Tampico to Avenida Montezuma 2D 19,000 16,900 0.89 D Avenida Montezuma to Calle Sinaloa 2D 19,000 13,000 0.68 B Avenida Bermudas Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 2D 19,000 11,300 0.59 A Desert Club Dr. Calle Tampico to Avenue 52 2U 14,000 8,900 0.64 B Avenue 48 to Eisenhower Drive 6D 61,100 68,600 1.12 F Washington Eisenhower Drive to Avenue 50 6D 61,100 53,100 0.87 D Street Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico 6D 61,100 51,900 0.85 D Calle Tampico to Avenida La Fonda 6D 61,100 29,300 0.48 A Avenida La Fonda to Avenue 52 6D 61,100 7,000 0.44 A Jefferson St Avenue 50 to Avenue 52 6D 61,100 35,200 0.58 A Avenue 50 Eisenhower Dr. to Washington St. 4D 42,600 4,600 0.11 A Washington St to Jefferson St. 4D 42,600 21,900 0.51 A Eisenhower Dr. to Avenida Bermudas 2D 19,000 12,300 0.65 B Calle Tampico Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club Dr. 2D 19,000 19,000 1.00 E Desert Club Dr to Washington St. 4D 42,600 39,400 0.92 E Avenida La Fonda West of Washington St. 2U 14,000 1,600 0.11 A Calle Sinaloa Eisenhower Dr. to Avenida Bermudas 4D 42,600 10,100 0.24 A Avenida Bermudas to Desert Club Dr. 2D 19,000 17,100 0.90 D Avenue 52 Desert Club Dr. to Washington St. 4D 42,600 20,100 0.47 A Washington St to Jefferson St. 4D 42,600 35,800 0.84 D Source: La Quints Village Build -out Plan, Study Intersections Table 15, Kunzman Associates Inc., May 2016. General Plan Buildout With Project With Village Buildout Circulation Plan Intersection Delay and Levels of Service Table 5.14-19, General Plan Buildout With Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service (Village Buildout Circulation Plan), shows intersection delay and levels of service for General Plan Buildout With Project traffic conditions based on the Village Buildout Circulation Plan. The table shows that the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable levels of service during the peak hours for General Plan Buildout With Project With Village Buildout Circulation Plan traffic conditions. Therefore, the proposed project is forecast to result in no significant traffic impacts at the study intersections under this scenario. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-79 August 2016 1005 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Table 5.14-19 General Plan Buildout With Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service (Village Buildout Circulation Plan) Intersection Jurisdiction) Traffic Contro12 Peak Hour Delay -LOSS Morning Evening Eisenhower Drive (NS) at: Avenue 50 (EW) - #1 LQ TS 17.2-13 22.4-C Calle Tampico (EW) - #2 LQ RBT 10.4-13 10.7-13 Avenida Montezuma (EW) - #3 LQ RBT 6.6-A 14.1-13 Calle Sinaloa (EW) - #4 LQ RBT 10.1-13 13.3-13 Avenida Bermudas (NS) at: Calle Tampico (EW) - #5 LQ RBT 5.7-A 10.7-13 Calle Sinaloa/Avenue 52 (EW) - #6 LQ RBT 5.9-A 23.2-C Desert Club Drive (NS) at: Calle Tampico (EW) - #7 LQ RBT 10.4-13 34.7-D Avenue 52 (EW) - #8 LQ TS 10.3-13 14.3-13 Washington Street (NS) at: Avenue 48 (EW) - #9 LQ TS 38.2-D 32.4-C Eisenhower Drive (EW) - #10 LQ TS 25.7-C 27.3-C Avenue 50 (EW) - #11 LQ TS 20.0-C 36.3-D Calle Tampico (EW) - #12 LQ TS 27.0-C 32.6-C Avenida La Fonda (EW) - #13 LQ CSS 11.8-13 12.8-13 Avenue 52 (EW) - #14 LQ TS 52.0-D 38.3-D Jefferson Street (NS) at: Avenue 50 (EW) - #15 LQ/1 TS 35.4-D 40.5-D Avenue 52 (EW) - #16 LQ RBT 6.7-A 29.0-D Source: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan, Study Intersections Table 16, Kunzman Associates Inc., May 2016. Notes: 1. LQ = City of La Quinta; I = City of Indio 2. TS = Traffic Signal; AWS = All Way Stop; RBT = Roundabout; CSS = Cross Street Stop 3. Intersection delay and Level of Service (LOS) has been calculated using the following analysis software: Traffix, Version 7.9.0215. Per the Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal, all way stop, and roundabout yield controls. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-80 August 2016 1006 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Conclusion Project Trip Generation At Interim Year (2021) conditions, the proposed project is forecast to generate a total of approximately 5,688 daily vehicle trips, 212 trips of which will occur during the morning peak hour and 352 trips of which will occur during the evening peak hour. At General Plan Build -out, the proposed project is forecast to generate a total of approximately 37,964 daily vehicle trips, 1,381 trips of which will occur during the morning peak hour and 2,329 trips of which will occur during the evening peak hour. Proposed road and intersection improvements will ensure that operations in the project area are at LOS D or better except for the roadway segments between Avenida Bermudas and Washington Street. For these segments, the City is committed to improve the level of service as the Village builds out by conducting periodic monitoring to identify when vehicle trips measurably decrease level of service (Mitigation Measure CIR-10), and implement appropriate Parking Demand Management strategies that will result in fewer vehicles along Calle Tampico. These may include but are not limited to identifying remote parking lots and providing shuttle service, and adopting performance measures for bicycles and pedestrians as a means of quantifying performance for alternative modes of transportation within the Village boundary. All Mitigation Measures are identified within this analysis are included in Section 5.14.6 below. C. Air Traffic Patterns Given the distance from the Village area to the nearest airports, five (5) miles to Bermuda Dunes Airport and more than seven (7) miles to the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport, implementation of the Village Build -out Plan would not impact air traffic patterns. As discussed in the Initial Study, there will be no impact and no further analysis is necessary. d-e. Hazards due to Design Features & Emergency Access The Village Build -out Plan does not include any specific projects, but instead, analyzes build -out of the Village based on desired residential and commercial development and redevelopment. Future projects are expected to be constructed on the Village's existing street grid, which generally provides safe, 90 degree intersections and appropriate line of sight. All future projects within The Village Build - out Plan project area will be required to undergo discretionary review with the City to ensure that design features are consistent with General Plan Policies and City Ordinances. The City's review of the project will analyze design features and project access to ensure that they are consistent with City guidelines and do not pose hazards to the public. Therefore, once a proposed project within the Village has been approved by the City, no hazards due to design or access would be present and impacts would be less than significant. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-81 August 2016 1007 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION f. Adopted Policies, Plans, or Programs for Alternative Transportation The goal of the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan is to create a mixed -use community with commercial, recreation, and residential amenities within walking distance of each other. Mitigation implemented towards the redesigning of roadways and intersections with roundabouts, worm medians, turning lanes and striping would reduce vehicle speeds thereby improving public safety and accessibility to the Village. Policy CIR 1.12 of the General Plan sets specific programs to achieve this goal. Along with mixed -use development, a large component of the policy entails creating pedestrian and bicycle connections to connect streets throughout the City. Ultimately, Policy LU 7.5 recommends developing a Master Non -motorized Transportation Plan for the Village. The Village Build -out Plan is designed to meet the goals and policies identified in Section 5.14.3 to enhance the circulation network in the project area to efficiently, safely and economically move people, vehicles and goods into and around the Village. Ways in which the Build -out Plan meets goals and policies include: establishing traffic -calming features in the project area (Policy Circ-1.10, Program Cir-1-10j) such as roundabouts and back -in parking; reduce vehicular traffic and reduce vehicle miles traveled through the development of a land use pattern that maximizes interactions between adjacent or nearby land uses (Policy Cir-1.12); and develop and encourage the use of continuous and convenient pedestrian and bicycle routes and multi -use paths (Policy Cir-2.3). Exhibit 5.14-20, Village Build -out Circulation Plan, shows the proposed circulation improvements (both roadway and sidewalk) in the project area. Exhibit 5.14-21, Example of a Multi -modal Street, shows how enhanced sidewalks, bike/golf cart, and roundabouts work. This plan would maximize alternative transportation, complete the pedestrian network (enhanced sidewalks) and enhance the bike/golf cart lanes, and ensure that travel lanes accommodate NEVs, all providing connectivity throughout the Build -out Plan project area. The improvements would not only connect the areas just south of Calle Tampico, but would improve access to the existing Village from the residential development to the south. The Village Build -out Plan will improve alternative transportation connectivity within the Village, which is consistent with General Plan Goals and Policies, so impacts would be less than significant. 5.14.5 Cumulative Impacts New and existing development within the Village will have the potential to create cumulative impacts if not given proper mitigation to address transportation and circulation within the Village Build -out Plan. Recommended design improvements to roadway segment and intersection infrastructure as identified in Mitigation Measures CIR-1 through CIR-10 would ensure acceptable level of service along with safe accessibility for automobile, pedestrian, bicyclist, golf cart, and NEV traffic to -and -from the Village Build -out project area. Furthermore, the parking reduction design as discussed in Section 5.9, La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-82 August 2016 1008 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Land Use, will situate parking in such a way that it does not cumulatively impede upon, or obstruct circulation outside of the Build -out plan project area. Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will allow the continued development of the Village with a mix of residential, retail, commercial office and professional office uses to create an urban environment at a human scale, with fewer motor vehicles, so that people feel comfortable walking, riding a bicycle, or driving an electric golf cart to and around the Village. Motor vehicles will still feature prominently in the Village however, it is the City's intent in providing the infrastructure for alternative modes of transportation, that the reliance on them can be reduced and thus increase the level of service on local streets within the project area. A major concern in the Village is the amount and location of available parking for visitors. As documented in The City of La Quinta Village District Parking Study (Carl Walker, Inc. 2006), significant parking surplus existed in almost all study areas within the Village. However, most of the surplus parking in the Village was designated as private with restricted use, which at that time, approximately 20.8 percent (or 606 spaces) were designated as public parking and with the remaining 79.2 percent (or 2,313 spaces) of parking supply restricted to private parking. To alleviate this unused potential, the study recommended that the City adopt a methodology within the study (Section 3.03) pertinent to, 1) monitoring parking utilization, 2) applying parking demand ratios in a shared parking model, and 3) improving the utilization of nearby parking supplies. Furthermore, fulfillment of a quantification analysis for each individual project within the Build -out Plan should be performed in order to determine project's cumulative impact in creating deficit parking and to provide additional measures to counteract this deficit. These recommendations have been incorporated into the Parking Demand Management strategies identified in this Section. 5.14.6 Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures are recommended for Interim Year With Project traffic conditions: CIR-1 Washington Street/Avenida La Fonda (#13): Construct a raised "worm" median to allow northbound left -turns and restrict eastbound left -turns. CIR-2 Jefferson Street/Avenue 52 (#16): Reconstruct the existing roundabout to provide two circulating lanes and two entry lanes at the northbound and southbound approaches. The new two lane roundabout should be constructed with consideration for conversion to a three lane roundabout by General Plan Buildout conditions. The following Mitigation Measures are recommended for General Plan Buildout With Project traffic conditions: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-83 August 2016 1009 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION CIR-3 Eisenhower Drive/Avenida Montezuma (#3): Convert Eisenhower Drive/Avenida Montezuma from an all -way stop control to a yield -controlled roundabout [this improvement is assumed in the Village Buildout Circulation Plan]. CIR-4 Washington Street/Avenue 48 (#9): Construct the northbound approach to consist of three through lanes and one right -turn lane. Remove the pedestrian crosswalk at the north leg of the intersection. Based on the City's traffic study guidelines, the following circulation improvements are recommended in addition to the roadway improvements identified in the current General Plan Circulation Element: CIR-5 Eisenhower Drive / Calle Tampico (#2): Construct one additional westbound left -turn lane to provide dual left -turn lanes. CIR-6 Avenida Bermudas/Calle Tampico (#5): Construct one additional westbound left -turn lane. The TIA identified an alternative to construct a roundabout rather than adding an additional lane in the event that the improvement identified in the General Plan Circulation Element is infeasible. This will be determined by the Design and Development Director/City Engineer. CIR-7 Desert Club Drive / Calle Tampico (#7): Construct one exclusive northbound right -turn lane and one additional westbound left -turn lane. The TIA identified an alternative to construct a roundabout rather than adding an additional lane in the event that the improvement identified in the General Plan Circulation Element is infeasible. This will be determined by the Design and Development Director/City Engineer. CIR-8 Washington Street/Avenue 48 (#9): Construct one exclusive northbound right -turn lane. CIR-9 Washington Street/Avenue 52 (#14): Construct one additional eastbound left -turn lane to provide triple left -turn lanes. Provide one additional southbound left -turn lane to provide triple left -turn lanes. The following mitigation measure is related specifically to intersections that have been identified to operate at LOS E along Calle Tampico CIR-10 For road segments along Calle Tampico between Avenida Bermudas and Washington Street, the City shall conduct periodic monitoring of actual conditions in the Village (timing to be determined as development begins to occur in the project area, and will review its Parking Demand Management strategies (directly correlated with traffic volumes) to determine additional strategies that can be employed related to remote parking and shuttle service, additional pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and education programs. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-84 August 2016 1010 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting A. The TIA identified a number of intersection improvements to be made either in Interim Year 2021, or traffic analysis showed the need for improvements to a number of intersections, the timing of which would be determined as development occurs in the Village Build -out Plan project area. (CIR-1 through CIR-9) Responsible Parties: Design and Development Director/City Engineer. B. The City shall conduct periodic monitoring of conditions in the Village to review the effectiveness of adopted Parking Demand Management strategies. (CIR-10) Responsible Parties: Design and Development Director/City Engineer. 5.14.7 Level of Significance after Mitigation Implementation of Mitigation Measures CIR-1 through CIR-10 and adherence to goals, policies and programs as identified above all new development within the project area will assist in minimizing cumulative impacts in regard to traffic and circulation and are expected to be less than significant with the exception of roadway segments: • Washington Street between Avenue 48 and Eisenhower Drive; • Calle Tampico between Avenida Bermudas and Desert Club Drive; and • Calle Tampico between Desert Club Drive and Washington Street. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-85 August 2016 1011 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.14 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 5.14-86 August 2016 1012 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 5.15 Utilities and Service Systems 5.15.1 Introduction This Section describes the existing setting for utility systems and potential effects from implementation of the Village Build -out Plan. These include: Water Supply, Wastewater Collection and Treatment, Storm Drains, Solid Waste Disposal and Diversion, and Electricity and Natural Gas. These potential effects are evaluated and considered, and where appropriate, included with mitigation. Resources used to prepare this section are included in Chapter 9, References. 5.15.2 Existing Conditions Wastewater Collection and Treatment Sanitary sewer collection and treatment facilities are provided by the Coachella Valley Water District within most of the City. There are two CVWD wastewater treatment plants that serve La Quinta. Water Reclamation Plant 7 (WRP-7) is located at Madison Street and Avenue 38, northeast of the City in Indio. It provides wastewater treatment for development in the City of La Quinta north of Miles Avenue. The capacity of WRP-7 is 5 million gallons per day (mgd), and the plant processes approximately 2.8 Currently there is sufficient excess capacity; therefore, although expansion capacity exists, no such plans are proposed at this time. The Mid -Valley Water Reclamation Plant (WRP-4), located in Thermal (11.8 miles southeast of the Village), serves the area in the City of La Quinta located south of Miles Avenue including the Village Build -out Plan project area. The WRP-4 has a current capacity of 9.9 mgd, and processes approximately 45 mgd per day. WRP-4 does not include tertiary treatment facilities. CVWD indicates that such facilities could be located at this plant in the future should demand warrant. CVWD sewer lines utilize a system of trunk lines ranging in diameter from 8 to 42 inches. Existing sewer line infrastructure are currently in place in the project area. CVWD may need additional facilities to provide for the orderly expansion of its sanitation systems. These facilities may include additional gravity pipelines or lift station(s) expansion and facilities. Individual proposals within the Build -out Plan area will be reviewed to assure that these additional facilities, if required, are incorporated into construction plans. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-1 August 2016 1013 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Water Supply The Coachella Valley including the project area is located within the Colorado River Watershed, which drains into the Salton Trough. The desert climate is characteristically dry, with an average of less than 4 inches of annual rainfall. Therefore, water is an especially limited and valuable resource. To satisfy the demand for water from residential, commercial and agricultural users, the Coachella Valley supplements local groundwater supplies with water from northern California and the Colorado River. Northern California water is conveyed to southern California via the California aqueduct. Over 23 million people and 755,000 acres of agricultural lands are served by the system. Supplies to southern California vary annually based on weather. Water supplies are more available in wet years and decrease during dry years. California is entitled to 4.4 million acre feet of Colorado River water per year, as set forth in a 1964 Supreme Court ruling. Although Colorado River water is one of the Coachella Valley's main source of water, it is considered poor in quality. In addition to the high levels of total dissolved solids, this water has been cited as contributing to the salinity problems in the Valley. This supply is used mainly for irrigation. Whitewater River Subbasin The Coachella Valley is underlain by a substantial subsurface groundwater basin. Over millions of years, conditions created by the Valley's geology and water runoff from surrounding mountains have resulted in water collecting in the aquifer, which generally extends from the Whitewater River in the northwest to the Salton Sea in the southeast. The aquifer is naturally divided by fault barriers into subbasins, which are further divided into subareas. The Whitewater River Subbasin (also known as the "Indio Subbasin") encompasses approximately 400 square miles and underlies most of the Coachella Valley. It is bounded on the north by Garnet Hill Fault, on the east by the San Andreas Fault, and on the south by the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains. It is estimated that the Subbasin contains approximately 28.9 million acre-feet of groundwater within the first 1,000 feet below the ground surface. There are five subareas within the Whitewater River Subbasin: the Palm Springs subarea, the Garnet Hill subarea, the Thermal subarea, the Thousand Palms subarea, and the Oasis subarea. The City, Village and Sphere are underlain by the Thermal subarea, which is part of the Lower Whitewater River Subbasin. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-2 August 2016 1014 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Thermal Subarea The division between the upper and lower portions of the Whitewater River subbasin is located in the Thermal subarea. The juncture of the Thermal Subarea with the Palm Springs Subarea, which lies to the west, occurs near Cathedral City. Based on measurement data for the Palm Springs and Thermal subareas, there appears to be no distinction between the water tables of the upper and lower subarea, except for the "hinge effect" of the Thermal subarea at Point Happy. Groundwater levels have generally remained stable, although more recently, increased pumpage has lowered groundwater levels in the lower Whitewater River subbasin. Conditions in most of the Thermal Subarea are confined or semi -confined, with movement caused by differences in piezometric (pressure) levels. Although unconfined or free water conditions occur within alluvial fans such as those that at the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains, an area of reduced permeability, or "aquitard" occurs between the two aquifers. Reduced permeability is created where fine grained materials such as sand and gravel lenses occur. This aquitard forms the boundary between the upper and lower aquifers in the Thermal subarea. The upper and aquifer zones of the Thermal subarea have similar lithology, although the lower aquifer is thought to be thicker and to receive more subsurface inflow than the upper aquifer. The lower aquifer is considered the most important source of groundwater in the Coachella Valley Groundwater basin. It serves the area easterly of Washington Street. In this portion of the subarea, the top of the water table ranges from 300 to 600 feet below the surface. Although undetermined, the aquifer is believed to be at least 500 feet thick and some estimates suggest that it may be over 1000 feet thick. While the aquifer contains vast water supplies, water table levels vary based on demand. Underlying the lower subarea is an aquitard that is generally 100 to 200 feet thick, and up to as much as 500 feet thick in some areas along the edge of the Salton Sea CVWD provides domestic and irrigation water services to the City, including the project area. The CVWD domestic water system is comprised of a system of 30 pressure zones in which water supplies are drawn from 100 active wells from water is distributed to users. CVWD uses pressure booster pump and regulating valve stations to transfer water between pressures zones. The City is served by the following pressure zones: Valley, Upper, Middle and Lower La Quinta, and Lake Cahuilla. CVWD has nearly 75 enclosed storage reservoirs. Domestic water is distributed via a system of pipelines ranging in size from 4-inches to 36-inches in diameter, located in public street rights of way. In 2005, CVWD provided 40.3 billion gallons of water to 240,573 residents in its service area. CVWD has 21 active wells within the City and Sphere of Influence. In addition, there are 6 booster stations and 10 planned or existing reservoirs in the City and its Sphere. Each reservoir has between 250,000 and 12 million gallons of capacity, and a total storage capacity for all reservoirs of 44.6 million gallons. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-3 August 2016 1015 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Total extraction exceeds the total amount recharged into the Lower Whitewater River Subbasin, resulting in a condition known as overdraft. This condition has resulted in a decline in groundwater levels in many portions of the eastern Valley from La Quinta to the Salton Sea. Concerns related to these conditions include potential degradation of water quality and land subsidence. Solid Waste The City has a franchise agreement with Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, LLC (Burrtec) for the provision of solid waste disposal in the City. Non -hazardous household, commercial and most non- hazardous industrial solid waste collected is taken to the Edom Hill Transfer Station (EHTS) in Cathedral City, or the Coachella Valley Transfer Station (CVTS), located at the site of the closed Coachella Landfill north of the 1-10 freeway, east of Dillon Road. From either site, waste is generally transported to the Lamb Canyon regional landfill, which is owned by the County of Riverside. The Integrated Waste Management Act (AB 939), passed in 1989, and as adopted by the City requires California cities and counties to meet a variety of recycling and reuse goals, including diverting at least 50 percent of their solid waste stream through new and ongoing waste and recycling programs. The City also adopted Assembly Bill 341, which was signed into legislation by the Governor of California, and requires mandatory commercial recycling for businesses that generate four or more cubic yards of waste weekly. The law also applies to apartments and condominium complexes of five or more units, regardless of the amount of waste generated. The new law became effective on July 1, 2012. Burrtec assists the City with its solid waste recycling efforts. These include residential and commercial collection of paper, plastic, glass and aluminum; and greenwaste that can be composted and sold as soil amendment products. The City is currently required to implement new and maintain ongoing waste and recycling programs and recycle at least 50 percent of its solid waste stream, and is meeting that goal. Special programs, including the collection and disposal of household hazardous waste, construction and demolition materials, and medical "sharps" (syringes and needles), as well as commercial recycling, are also administered by Burrtec. Burrtec also has green waste recycling capabilities. Brush and other greenwaste from La Quinta are taken to the Edom Hill Compost facility (EHC) or the Coachella Valley Compost facility (CVC), located at the site of the closed Coachella Landfill north of the 1-10 freeway, east of Dillon Road. According to CalRecycle, the State's integrated waste management agency, solid waste generated by construction and demolition sites may account for as much as 22 percent of the solid waste stream. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the City refers developers to Burrtec environmental staff to develop a recycling plan to recycle at least 50 percent of these materials. According to the 2014 CalRecycle Electronic Annual Report for the City of La Quinta (Appendix G), residential development in the City generated approximately 15,031 pounds per day of solid waste. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-4 August 2016 1016 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS In contrast, the Village Build -out Plan project area currently generates approximately 4,382 pounds per day of solid waste, or approximately 3,470 pounds per day of residential waste and 912 pounds per day of commercial waste. Electric Power Imperial Irrigation District (IID) provides electric power in the City and the Sphere of Influence. IID delivers electric service by means of power generation and contractual agreements. There are six IID substations within or near the City of La Quinta, as follows: • North La Quinta Substation — northwest corner of Adams Street and Westward Ho; • La Quinta Substation — southwest corner of Avenue 48 and Jefferson Street; • Jefferson Substation — Jefferson Street at the northeast corner of Avenue 52; • Marshall Substation — northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenida Ultimo; • Avenue 58 Substation — northwest corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street; • Thermal Substation — south of Airport Boulevard and east of Highway 111. Substations are gauged at 92 or 161 kilovolts (kV), and from there electrical power is decreased for distribution to customers at 12.47 kV. There are eight proposed substations in the eastern Coachella Valley. Of these, one was discussed in the General Plan update between the easterly Sphere boundaries and the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport. This substation is still in the planning stages. Other proposed substation locations include: • Near Avenue 54 and Monroe Street; • At Van Buren Street and Avenue 64; • Near Avenue 60 and Monroe Street; • At Avenue 58 and Harrison Street; • At Madison Ave and Avenue 64; • At 54 and Harrison Street; • At Avenue 62 and Harrison Street. The City's Municipal Code (Chapter 13.24.110) requires that all utilities in new residential districts and subdivisions be undergrounded. 5.15.3 Applicable Goals and Policies GOAL UTL-1 Domestic water utilities and services which adequately serve the existing and long-term needs of the City. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-5 August 2016 1017 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Policy UTL-1.1 The City should coordinate with the Coachella Valley Water District to assure that sufficient water supplies are available to sustain current and future development. Program UTL-1.1a: Work with the Coachella Valley Water District to expand the availability of tertiary treated water, non -potable canal water, and encourage its use for landscape irrigation purposes, especially for irrigating golf courses and other large landscaped areas. Policy UTL-1.2 The City should encourage the conservation of water. Program UTL-1.2a: Develop programs, both in conjunction with the Coachella Valley Water District and independently, to allow and encourage the retrofitting of existing water - intensive appliances and irrigation systems in existing development. Program UTL-1.2b: City and private sector development projects shall implement water efficient landscaping plans which meet or exceed current water efficiency standards. Policy UTL-1.3 New development shall reduce its projected water consumption rates over "business -as -usual" consumption rates. Policy UTL-1.4 Review and amend Development Standards to require that all new development demonstrate a reduction of domestic water consumption equivalent to, or exceeding, the CalGreen Tier One standards in effect at the time of development. hn n I / IT/ -') Sanitary sewer facilities and services which adequately serve the existing and long-term needs of the City. Policy UTL-2.1 All new development should be required to connect to sanitary sewer service. Program UTL-2.1a: Review and amend Development Standards and Review Procedures to ensure coordination with the Coachella Valley Water District and assurance that existing sewer service along with the extension of sewer service is capable of meeting the needs of current and forecasted development. 5.15.4 Project Impact Analysis Thresholds of Significance The following standards and criteria have been drawn from Appendix G Environmental Checklist Form of the CEQA Guidelines to assess the significance of potential impacts to utilities and La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-6 August 2016 1018 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS service systems that may result from the adoption and implementation development of the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan. Impacts would be considered significant if implementation of the General Plan would result in the following: a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board. b. Require or result in the construction of new or wastewater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. c. Require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. d. Not have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or new expanded entitlements are needed. e. Fail to result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments. f. Not be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs. g. Fail to comply with federal, state, and local statues and regulations related to solid waste. h. Lead to the inefficient, wasteful and unnecessary consumption of energy resources. a. Exceed Wastewater Treatment Requirements of the Applicable RWQCB Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will facilitate development that will increase demand on existing wastewater collection and treatment facilities. It is assumed that domestic wastewater flows are equivalent to the potable water demand projections, which averaged approximately 69.3 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) in 2010 and are projected to average 55.44 gpcd at build out for entire City including the Village Build -out Plan project area. As discussed in Section 5.8 Hydrology and Water Quality, the Village Build -out Plan would generate a water demand of approximately 202,273 gpcd for residential and 76,779 gpcd for commercial uses. As a fraction of the total water demand and as shown in Table 5.15-1, Project Wastewater Generation, wastewater generated would be approximately 175,890 gpcd for residential uses and 71,021 gpcd for commercial uses. The amount of wastewater from residential and commercial uses was derived from 85 percent of potable water ending up as discharged wastewater (i.e., toilets, sinks, showers, etc.) and the remaining 15 percent ending up as irrigated landscape. As discussed in the General Plan EIR, the total projected wastewater generated for all land uses in 2010 for the City and its Sphere of Influence was approximately 4.1 million gpcd. In comparison, the total amount of wastewater projected to be generated for the Village Build -out Plan project area would be approximately 279,052 gpcd or 6.81 percent of the overall 4.1 million generated by the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-7 August 2016 1019 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS City and Sphere. It is likely that over time, as the City and CVWD's requirements for water conservation become more stringent, the gpcd of wastewater could be reduced. Although this level of wastewater generation is substantial, it will not exceed the combined treatment capacity at the CVWD treatment plants serving the City and project area. Further, CVWD continues to plan for expansion as needed. As future development occurs within the Build -out Plan, the City and its Sphere, existing facilities may need to be expanded to build out capacity to accommodate wastewater generation. Development within the Village Build -out Plan project area is projected to occur over a 20-year period coinciding with the General Plan 2035 build -out scenario. In maintaining consistency with General Plan Policy UTL-2.1, all new development will be required to connect to sanitary services by tying -into existing sewer lines currently in place within the Village. To address new development within the Village and the La Quinta City and Sphere, the City and CVWD will have the opportunity to plan for and strategize options that may include construction of new sewer collection facilities and increase treatment capacity in order to address the long-term needs of the City and in maintaining consistency with General Plan Goal UTL-2 and Program UTL-2.1a. Nevertheless, growth trends will need to be monitored to ensure that adequate wastewater treatment facilities are provided to serve the project area. As future development connects to existing sewer facilities within the Village, they will nonetheless continue to be subject to connection fees. Mitigation Measures UTL-1 and UTL-2 will ensure that impacts in regard to wastewater generation, services, treatment and infrastructure are reduced to less than significant levels. b. Require or result in the construction or extension of wastewater drainage facilities The project area is already served by sewer lines that are adequate for existing development. The proposed Village Build -out Plan calls for an additional 1,230 residences and up to an additional 799,786 square feet of non-residential uses (retail, restaurants, commercial and professional office, etc.). The increase in density and the intensification of land uses allowed under this plan through increased building height and development of mixed use projects, will increase the amount of wastewater generated in the project area. Development in the project area will occur over a 20-year period coinciding with the General Plan 2035 build -out scenario. All new development and redevelopment proposals within the Village Build -out Plan area will be required to connect to sanitary services by tying -into existing sewer lines currently in place within the Village. Growth trends will need to be monitored to ensure that adequate wastewater treatment facilities are provided to serve the project, Implementation of Mitigation Measure UTL-1 will ensure that coordination between the City and CVWD is continued La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-8 August 2016 1020 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS with regard to future development within the project area. Lastly, the requirement of all projects within the project area to pay a connection fee, will financially assist towards the future expansion and upgrading of wastewater drainage infrastructure and thus would ensure that impacts in this regard will be reduced to less than significant. C. Require or result in the construction or extension of stormwater drainage facilities Please see Section 5.8, Hydrology and Water Quality for a discussion of the storm drain system in the project area. d. Water Supply in Project Vicinity A Water Supply Study (WSS) was prepared for the La Quinta General Plan that provided estimates of existing water demands generated within the La Quinta City and Sphere, and projected future water demands that will be generated at build out of the proposed General Plan. Development within the Village Build -out Plan project area was included in the WSS analysis as part of the City's overall development with an estimated 8,180 units projected for the entire City. It should be noted that the WSS prepared for the General Plan was programmatic, and that future qualifying individual development projects within the City may be subject to preparation of project -level WSSs as warranted. Future development projects within the Village Build -out Plan will not require a WSS, as it is unlikely that new projects would rise to the level in requiring a WSS. For example, the threshold for a residential development project is 500 dwelling units. Existing Water Demands Table 5.15-1. Estimate of Existing Water Service Demands, shows the estimated water demands that were generated for the La Quinta City and Sphere, included the Village Build -out Plan project area, at intensities that would result in X less commercial square footage and Y fewer dwelling units. As shown in Table 5.15-1, the existing water demands for the La Quinta City and Sphere are estimated to be 32,496 acre-feet per year, consisting of 31,227 acre-feet within City limits and 1,268 acre-feet within the Sphere of Influence. Existing water demands for the La Quinta City and Sphere are comprised of 3.9 percent within the Sphere and 96.1 percent within City limits. Water Demands at Build -Out (2035) Table 5.15-2, Estimate of Water Service Demands at Build Out, shows the projected water demand for land uses in the City, the Village Build -out Plan, the Sphere and the entire La Quinta City and Sphere at build out, assuming that new development adheres to water efficiency building standards and existing development continues to generate business as usual water demands. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-9 August 2016 1021 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Table 5.15-2, Estimate of Water Service Demands at Build Out, shows that the build out water demands for the La Quinta City Limits including the Village Build -out Plan project area are estimated to be 38,098 acre-feet per year, consisting of 37,783 acre-feet within City limits and 314.85 acre- feet within the Village Build -out Plan project area. In comparison, the Build -out Plan would result in approximately 240.65 acre-feet of domestic water demand over the amount estimated for the entire City limits. This represents an increase of approximately 0.83 percent. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-10 August 2016 1022 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Table 5.15-1 Estimate of Existing Water Service Demands Landscaping Potable Total Demand Daily Demand Land Use Designation (ac-ft/yr) (ac-ft/yr) (ac-ft/yr) (mgd) La Quinta City Limits Low Density Residential 6,482.65 4,091.66 10,574.31 9.44 Medium/HighDensity Residential 1,157.40 521.42 1,678.83 1.5 Commercial 311.87 1,007.61 1,319.48 1.18 MajorCommunitvFacilities 295.91 111.99 407.9 0.36 Open Space - Natural N/A N/A - - Open Space- Recreation 16,465.48 N/A 16,465.48 14.7 Streets, Sidewalks, Medians 781.47 N/A 781.47 0.7 Total 25,494.78 5,732.69 31,227.46 27.88 Sphere of Influence Low Densitv Residential 857.11 157.31 1,014.42 0.91 Medium/HighDensity Residential 0.18 - 0.18 0 Commercial 17.71 43.03 60.74 0.05 Major Community Facilities 30.65 13.26 43.9 0.04 Streets, Sidewalks, Medians 149.17 N/A 149.17 0.13 Total 1,054.82 213.6 1,268.42 1.13 Planning Area Summary Low Density Residential 7,339.76 4,248.97 11,588.73 10.35 Medium/HighDensity Residential 1,157.58 521.42 1,679.01 1.5 Commercial/Industrial 329.58 1,050.64 1,380.22 1.23 Major Community Facilities 326.56 125.25 451.81 0.4 Open Space - Natural N/A N/A - - Open Space- Recreation 16,465.48 N/A 16,465.48 14.7 Streets, Sidewalks, Medians 930.641 N/A 930.641 0.83 Total 26,549.59 5,946.28 32,495.88 29.01 Source: Table III-51, "La Quinta General Plan Water Resources Projections," Appendix A to Water Supply Study, prepared by Terra Nova Planning & Research Inc., January 2011. Proposed Development At build out development within the La Quinta City and Sphere is expected to consume 54,467 acre- feet of water per year, which represents an increase in water demand of approximately 21,971 acre-feet compared to water demands generated by existing development. Table 5.15-3, Estimate of Water Service Demands from New Development below shows the projected water demand that will be generated from new development set forth in the 2035 General Plan. Table 5.15-3 shows that 70 percent of the new water demand will be generated by new development within the Sphere, and 30 percent will be generated by new development within City Limits. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-11 August 2016 1023 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Table 5.15-2 Estimate of Water Service Demands at Build Out Landscaping Potable Total Demand Daily Demand Land Use Designation (ac-ft/yr) (ac-ft/yr) (ac-ft/yr) (mgd) La Quinta City Limits Low Density Residential 9,294.22 4,881.63 14,175.85 12.66 Medium/High-Density 1,502.34 1,016.81 2,519.15 2.25 Commercial 496.72 1,360.39 1,857.11 1.66 MaiorCommunityFacilities 476.80 149.64 626.44 0.56 Open Space - Natural N/A N/A N/A N/A Open Space - Recreation 17,681.77 N/A 17,681.77 15.79 Streets, Sidewalks, Medians 922.39 N/A 922.39 0.82 Total 30,374.25 7,408.47 37,782.72 33.73 Village Build -out Plan Area (current conditions) Residential - 284 DU 3.09 45.50 48.59 0.04 Commercial - 151,925 sq. ft. 3.09 16.34 19.43 0.01 Streets, Sidewalks, Medians 3.09 N/A 3.09 0.00 Total 9.27 61.84 74.20 0.05 Village Build -out Plan (build -out conditions) Residential - 1,230 DU 10.61' 197.02 207.63 0.19 Commercial - 799,786 sq. ft. 10.61' 86.00 96.61 0.09 Streets, Sidewalks, Medians 10.61' N/A 10.61 0.01 Total 31.83 283.02 314.85 0.29 Source: Table III-512, "La Quinta General Plan Water Resources Projections," Appendix A to Water Supply Assessment, prepared by Terra Nova Planning & Research Inc., January 2011. Notes: 1. Assuming that 15 percent of total water demand is allocated for landscaping. Table 5.15-3 Estimate of Water Service Demands from New Development La Quinta Landscaping (ac-ft/yr) Potable (ac-ft/yr) Total Demand (ac-ft/yr) Daily Demand (mgd) City Limits 4,879.47 1,675.78 6,555.26 5.85 Sphere of Influence 11,828.75 3,586.98 15,415.73 13.76 Planning Area Summary �16,708.23 5,262.77 21,970.99 19.61 Source: Table 111-53, Terra Nova/La Quinta General Plan EIR, July 2012. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-12 August 2016 1024 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Water Demand Consistency CVWD's 2010 UWMP accounted for new growth and development that is expected to occur within the La Quinta City limits, including the Village Build -out Plan project area. The goal of the UWMP is to assure groundwater basin sustainability with elements directed towards supplemental imported water, source substitution and water conservation. As such, these elements are required to be incorporated into the design and development of each future project within the Build -out Plan. As an urban water supplier. CVWD is required to prepare an Urban Water Management Plan UWMP) every five years in response to the requirements of the Urban Water Management Planning Act (UWMP Act). California Water Code Sections 10610 through 10656. Therefore. in 2015. CVWD commenced preparation of its revised UWMP, which was adopted in July of 2016. Section 3.3 of the General Plan WSS described that the water demand projections for the La Quinta General Plan Update € were relative to the water demand projections set forth in the CVWD UWMP. The average gallon per capita day (gpcd) water demand for the CVWD Service Area was approximately 482 gpcd for 2010 and is projected to be 423 gpcd for 2035. In comparison, the 2010 gcpd for the La Quinta City and Sphere was approximately 473 gcpd and is projected to be 361 gpcd in 2035. In contrast, the water demand estimates for the La Quinta City and Sphere for 2010 and 2035 are 2 percent and 15 percent more efficient compared to the CVWD estimates. As such, water demands generated by the General Plan Planning Area, including the Village Build - out project area, are fully=captured and accounted for within the 2010 and 2015 CVWD UWMP roje Of note is that future residential uses in the Village Build -out area will be multi -family projects developed in an urban setting where traditional yards would not occur. Landscaping represents a large percentage of water usage in traditional residential subdivisions that would Rat be Feali occur in the 1,230 new residential units proposed in the project area. Nonetheless any new landscaping proposed for development within the Build -out Plan will be required to comply with the City's landscape Ordinance which was adopted in accordance with the State's Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and CVWD's Ordinance 1302.1 as amended. Therefore, water demand projections as proposed under the 2035 General Plan are consistent with the water demand estimates utilized by CVWD. Water Use Targets CVWD's 2015 UWMP Water Use Targets show that a 20 percent water use reduction target for CVWD would amount to approximately 485 gpcd based on the updated 10-year baseline water use (606 gpcd), which is approximately 12 GPCD higher than the water use target determined in the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-13 August 2016 1025 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 2010 UWMP. Furthermore, the revised 2015 interim water use target of 545 GPCD is 13 GPCD higher than the target determined in the 2010 UWMP. Nonetheless, CVWD has opted to keep the lower water use targets as determined in the 2010 UWMP for future compliance. In comparison, the La Quinta City and Sphere, including the Village Build -out Plan project area, with a projected demand of 361 gpcd by 2035 would fall well below CVWD's target of 485 gcpd under the 10-year baseline. CVWD 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan The Village Build -out Plan is located within an area of the City that would be eligible for the funding of infrastructural improvements under CVWD's 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan. Adopted for fiscal ears 2016 thru 2020, the 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) provides funding directed towards water resource -related capital improvements. Funding is supplied through revenue sources that include unrestricted reserves, restricted developer fees, grants, reimbursements from other agencies the formation of an assessment district and bonds. The 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan directs funding towards a variety of projects which may or may not be applicable in the Village Build -out Plan area, and are discussed in further detail below. Domestic Water Projects The 5-Year CIP funds Domestic Water Projects that lead to the completion of construction of CVWD's chromium-6 treatment facilities, reservoir rehabilitation and construction, booster station upgrades, water main improvements and in well drillin&. Canal Water Projects The 5-Year CIP funds Canal Water Projects directed toward the Oasis Area Irrigation System Expansion Project (Oasis), which will be partially funded by the formation of an assessment district, and bond issuance. Funding for the Oasis Project will also include monies from the Canal Water Fund and the East Whitewater Replenishment Fund. Other notable projects include the Coachella Canal lining and replacement projects, numerous irrigation lateral replacements, and drain replacement projects at Durbrow and Harrison and Airport Roads. Sanitation Projects The 5-Year CIP funds Sanitation Projects directed toward treatment upgrades for Wastewater Reclamation Plant (WRP) 10, treatment upgrades for WRP 7 and treatment process upgrades to WRP 4. In addition, fundin& is reserved for collection system and lift station upgrades. Projects will be funded with unrestricted reserves, Sanitation Capacity Charge fees (restricted reserves), and r La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-14 August 2016 1026 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Storm water Projects The 5-Year CIP funds Stormwater Projects consisting of the Thousand Palms Flood Control Project. the North Cathedral City Stormwater Project and the North Indio Stormwater Project. In addition, there are several other areas which reauire construction fundmn� in the future for which master plans are being developed. Projects will be funded using unrestricted reserves and debt financing. Non -Potable Water Projects The 5-Year CIP funds Non -Potable Water Projects that currently involve the Mid -Valley Pipeline Master Plan, which be funded using unrestricted reserves and debt financing Replenishment Projects The 5-Year CIP funds Replenishment Projects directed toward the Oasis Area Irrigation System Expansion Project, pipeline connections and facility improvements. Motorpool The 5-Year CIP funds Motorpool Projects directed toward vehicle and other rolling stock replacements. Ground Water Quality Groundwater from wells throughout the Coachella Valley is carefully monitored by CVWD for hazardous pollutants. most notably Chromium-6. CVWD is currently embarked upon a multi -year program involving the construction of new infrastructure and facilities for the treatment of Chromium-6, which will be installed onsite at a number of existing and future domestic water wells within the Coachella Valley including wells that will serve the City of La Quinta and the Build -out Plan. The Build -out Plan's contribution of Development Impact Fees will assist in providing CVWD with the necessary funding to upgrade new infrastructure and will thereby maintain groundwater ualit . Impacts to Water Supply Resources As described, CVWD serves as the water provider for the City of La Quinta. Water supplies that serve the existing La Quinta City and Sphere are derived from groundwater in storage and imported Colorado River water and State Water Project (SWP) exchange water. All urban water demands are currently met through groundwater supplies. New water demands generated by proposed development in the Village Build -out Plan project area will be met through a combination of groundwater, imported supplies, and reclaimed water. CVWD expects to have sufficient water supplies to serve development in the La Quinta City and Sphere, including the Village Build -out Plan project area, through 2035 and beyond by utilizing a combination of water supply sources and treating surface water supplies to potable quality standards. CVWD projects that, in 2035, the urban water demand will be supplied by a total of La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-15 August 2016 1027 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 242,700 acre-feet per year consisting of 53 percent groundwater, 20 percent treated Colorado River Water, 22 percent untreated Colorado River Water, and 4 percent desalinated agricultural drain water. CVWD's current UWMP provides long term water supply/demand planning in an effort to protect water resources, preserve water quality, and assure that water supplies are available to meet demands. CVWD's UWMP evaluated water demands relative to supplies for the period between 2010 and 2035 under normal, single, and multiple dry year conditions. The current UWMP finds that with groundwater supplies, imported water supplies, water conservation programs, and recharge activity water supplies are sufficient to meet demands during normal, single, and multiple dry year conditions through 2035. As shown in Table 5.15-2, implementation of the Village Build -out Plan would result in an increase in the demand for water of approximately 314.85 acre-feet by 2035. This new demand will be met by groundwater, imported Colorado River water, desalinated agricultural drain water, or a combination thereof. As described above, CVWD has accounted for this increased water demand in conjunction with all other projected water demands within the service area. CVWD has determined that through utilization of a combination of water supply sources including the need to provide expanded availability of tertiary treated water, and coordination by the City in implementing CVWD UWMP regulations, sufficient water supplies will therefore be available to meet demands in 2035. As such, the level of additional water supplies needed to meet demands generated by development within the Village Build -out Plan will not substantially deplete groundwater reserves or interfere with groundwater recharge. The City of La Quinta relies on CVWD to manage and supply water resources. Nonetheless, the City is committed to promoting water conservation and achieving water savings, protecting groundwater reserves, and preserving groundwater quality. In the Village Build -out Plan, water conservation can be achieved through retrofitting of existing water -intensive appliances with the installation of water efficient appliances, implementation of water efficient landscaping plans for all new development, the use of new technology, and advanced irrigation control for outdoor landscaping. Mitigation Measures UTL-4 through UTL-10 will ensure that impacts in regard to water supply are reduced to less than significant. e. Wastewater services in project vicinity Please refer to discussion 5.15.4.a, above. f -g. Landfill Capacity and Solid Waste Burrtec is the franchise solid waste hauler for the City of La Quinta and most other cities in the Coachella Valley. Burrtec operates solid waste transfer stations; one at Edom Hill in the City of La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-16 August 2016 1028 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Cathedral City, and one at the closed Coachella Landfill in Riverside County north of the 1-10 freeway and east of Dillon Road. Burrtec, also operates compost facilities at both these locations, taking care of both solid waste transfer and greenwaste recycling for the City of La Quinta. Burrtec hauls solid waste to the County of Riverside Lamb Canyon landfill located between the cities of Beaumont and San Jacinto at 16411 Lamb Canyon Road (State Route 79). The landfill is permitted to receive a maximum of 5,000 tons per day. As of January 2015, the landfill had a total remaining capacity of approximately 19,242,950 cubic yards or 14.4 million tons, if it is assumed that one cubic yard of solid waste compacted in place in a landfill is 0.75 tons (CDRRR, 2016). It is projected that current landfill capacity will extend to 2029, at a minimum. The Lamb Canyon landfill has potential for expansion. Greenwaste, foodwaste and some liquid wastes, including grease trap liquids and graywater, are taken to the Coachella Valley Compost facility where they are treated as feedstock that is blended into windrows that are treated and turned until it is ready to be cured and sold as soil amendment products. In the future, solid waste from the Village Build -out Plan project area may also be transported to other regional landfills, including the Badlands facility, located in Moreno Valley, the El Sobrante landfill in Corona, or the Salton City landfill in north Imperial County west of Highway 86. Both of the Riverside County landfills currently have excess capacity, and the Salton City landfill was recently permitted (2015) to provide additional capacity. Development facilitated by the General Plan is expected to result in approximately 53,103 dwelling units. Of these, approximately 46,866 will be single-family units, and approximately 6,236 will be multi -family units. Up to approximately 12,364,631 square feet of commercial development, which is assumed to be primarily retail uses, and 611,408 square feet of industrial development will also be constructed. The Village, under existing conditions without implementation of the Build -out Plan, would provide approximately 284 new dwelling units and 151,925 square feet of commercial uses, which would account for approximately 0.5 percent, and 1.2 percent of total buildout in the City respectively. In comparison, implementation of the Build -out Plan would provide 1,230 new dwelling units and 799,786 square feet of commercial uses, which would account for approximately 2.3 percent, and 6.4 percent of total buildout in the City respectively. Although smaller in comparison to the General Plan area, the Village Build -out Plan will contribute to an increased generation of solid waste. The three existing landfills have long-term capacity sufficient for expected solid waste generated from the Village Build -out Plan, and Burrtec plans on providing service to accommodate future development for the Village Build -out Plan project area. As the City continues to implement existing and initiate new recycling efforts, it is expected that impacts to regional landfills will decrease. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-17 August 2016 1029 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Based on solid waste generation factors provided by Calrecycle applied to land uses in the General Plan including the Village Build -out Plan project area, an estimate of solid waste was generated. Table 5.15-41 Solid Waste Generation at Build Out, compares the amount of waste generated for the La Quinta City and Sphere with the Village Build -out Plan under existing conditions and through implementation. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-18 August 2016 1030 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Table 5.15-4 Solid Waste Generation at Build Out La Quinta Planning Area (City, Sphere) Land Use Type Generation Rate Unit Type Dwelling Units/sq. ft. Pounds/ Day Annual Tons of Solid Waste Single Family 2.0400 tons/unit/year 46,866 DU 530,000 95,607 Multi -Family 1.1700 tons/unit/year 6,236 DU 40,000 7,296 Retail/Commercial 0.0024 tons/sf/year 12,364,631 sq. ft. 162,000 29,675 Industrial 0.0108 tons/sf/year 611,408 sq. ft. 36,000 6,603 Total 768,000 139,181 Village Build -out Plan (current conditions) Land Use Type Generation Rate Unit Type Dwelling Units/sq. ft. Pounds/ Day Annual Tons of Solid Waste Residential' 12.22 pounds/day 284 DU 3,470 633 Retail/Commercial' 0.006 pounds/sq. ft./day 151,925 sq. ft. 912 166 Total 4,382 799 Total with La Quinta Planning Area 139,1813 Village Build -out Plan (with implementation) Land Use Type Generation Rate Unit Type Dwelling Units/sq. ft. Pounds/ Day Annual Tons of Solid Waste Residential' 12.22 pounds/day 1,230 DU 15,030 2,743 Retail/Commercia12 0.006 pounds/sq. ft./day 799,786 sq. ft. 4,800 876 Total 19,830 3,619 Total with La Quintal Planning Area 142,0004 Source: Altum Group July, 2016, La Quinta 2035General Plan EIR, 2013. CalRecycle: Commercial Sector: Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. Notes: 1. Solid Waste: Residential — 4.7 lb/day/person x 2.6 persons per household = 12.22 lb/day. 2. Solid Waste: Non-residential — Specialty Commercial per the TIA consisting of a variety of retail, restaurant and office uses - .006 Ib/sgft/day. 3. Projected amount of dwelling units and commercial area for Village Build -out Planning Area under current conditions as included in the La Quinta Planning Area analysis. 4. Village Build -out Plan under current conditions originally included in the La Quinta Planning Area analysis for the 2035 General Plan EIR. 5. Includes amount of potential dwelling units and commercial square footage exceeding current conditions threshold without implementation. Based on the level of development without implementation of the Village Build -out Plan, the La Quinta City and Sphere would generate approximately 139,181 tons of solid waste per year. Development of the La Quinta City and Sphere with implementation of the Build -out Plan would generate approximately 142,000 tons of solid waste per year or a 2 percent increase of an additional 2,819 tons per year. On a daily basis, this equates to 389 tons of solid waste. Actual waste generation will depend on future levels of development, and participation in stream flow diversion programs. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-19 August 2016 1031 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS There are no land uses within the Village Build -out Plan project area that are expected to generate large quantities of solid waste or create conditions where substantial hazardous wastes are produced. Development facilitated by the Village Build -out Plan will nonetheless result in increased volumes of solid waste generation as a fraction of the entire amount of solid waste generated for the City and Sphere. Therefore, the City and Burrtec will need to continue to monitor these levels to ensure that disposal of solid waste generated is performed in a cost-effective and in a safe operative mode. Mitigation Measures USS-11 and USS-12 will ensure that impacts in regard to landfill capacity and solid waste are reduced to less than significant levels. h. The effects of the project on energy resources Based on historical use data for the City of La Quinta and its Sphere provided by IID for the General Plan 2035 Program EIR, it was estimated that residential development consumes approximately 16,798 kilowatt hours per year (kwh/year). Estimated electricity usage rates by land use type are shown in Table 5.15-1, Estimated Electricity Usage Rates. Table 5.15-5, Estimated Electricity Usage Rates Land Use Annual Usage Rate Residential 16,798 Kilowatt-hour/unit/year Commercial 57.88 Kilowatt-hour/square feet/year Industrial 57.88 Kilowatt-hour/square feet/year Source: La Quinta 2035General Plan EIR, 2013. Estimates of annual electrical demand for General Plan build out were based on the annual usage rates as shown above. These rates were applied to the proposed General Plan land uses at build out, which would result in electrical consumption of approximately 1,645,145,600 kwh/year. Broken down, single family residential uses consume approximately 791,924,912 kwh/year, 101,224,748 kwh/year for Multi -family uses, 716,607,636 kwh/year for commercial uses and 35,388,304 kwh/year for industrial uses. The Village Build -out Plan project area is considered within the overall consumption rates established in the Program EIR. On its own and at build -out of the Village Build -out Plan, consumption of electricity in the project area would be roughly 14,291,614 kilowatt kwh/year for commercial uses and 20,661,540 kwh/year for residential uses with an overall total of 34,953,154 kwh/year or roughly 2.1 percent of the electrical demand under the General Plan. Such an increase will likely create a need for additional electrical power supply sources. IID provided a response to the Notice of Preparation of the Draft EIR for the proposed project (see Appendix A for this and other letters received in response to the NOP). IID advised that additional electrical infrastructure and/or modification thereof may be needed to service the project. To alleviate this impact, Mitigation Measure UTL-3 requires that the City create a tracking log to be used by the City and utility providers (wet and dry utilities) including IID, to address all new La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-20 August 2016 1032 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS development projects proposed in the Village Build -out Plan project area. The tracking log would be evaluated by the City and utility providers on a project -by -project basis by inputting the type and size of the proposed use and determining whether or not the project in review, would contribute to a significant impact or cumulative impact thereby requiring the expansion of utility infrastructure including electrical infrastructure improvements (i.e., substation, transformers, etc.). Therefore, this type of protocol, as implemented through UTL-3, would reduce impacts in regard to electrical services to less than significant. 5.15.5 Cumulative Impacts Implementation of the Village Build -out Plan will have the potential to create cumulative impacts if not given proper mitigation to address Utilities and Service Systems. Mitigation Measures UTL-1 and UTL-2 will assure sewer service connection and adequacy of facilities are cooperatively addressed between City of La Quinta and CVWD. Mitigation Measures UTL-3 will provide a mechanism for the City and CVWD to keep track on the number of residential units and square footage of non- residential development to determine when wet and dry infrastructure should be upgraded to continue to provide adequate service to the project area. Mitigation Measures UTL-4 and UTL-11 will assure that methods of water conservation measures in compliance with CVWD's current UWMP (or most recent UWMP in place), are incorporated into new individual development projects to lower water usage for landscaping and to comply with Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code, Title 20, California Administrative Code Section 1601(b), and applicable sections of Title 24 of the State Code. Mitigation Measure UTL-11 and UTL-12 will assure that the City refers project developers to Burrtec in order to prepare a construction and demolition solid waste recycling plan by diverting a minimum of 50 percent of C&D debris from the waste stream. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measures UTL-1 through UTL-12 and with adherence to goals, policies and programs as identified in the City's General Plan, all new development within the Village Build - out Plan project area will assist in minimizing cumulative impacts in regard to Utilities and Service Systems and are expected to be less than significant. 5.15.6 Mitigations Measures UTL-1 All new development within the Village Build -out Plan shall be connected to sanitary sewer service. UTL -2 The City shall ensure coordination with the Coachella Valley Water District to assure that existing and future extended sanitary sewer facilities are adequate to meet the needs of existing and expected future development of the Village Build -out Plan. UTL-3 The City shall create a tracking log for development projects in the project area that identifies the existing wet and dry infrastructure in the project area, then on a project -by - project basis, inputs the type and size of proposed uses, the potable water required, La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-21 August 2016 1033 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS wastewater generated and electrical demand generated. The City will work with CVWD, IID SCG and others to determine when upgrades to infrastructure will be required. UTL-4 All project development within the Village Build -out Plan shall coordinate and cooperate with CVWD to ensure City-wide compliance with current State Senate Bill x7-7 to reduce per capita urban water use by 36 percent for year 2016, and 20 percent reduction by year 2020, including landscaping conversion programs and the smart irrigation control program; expanding the availability of sustainable water supplies such as tertiary treated water, and encouraging its use for landscape irrigation purposes, especially for irrigating golf courses and other large landscaped areas. UTL -5 The City shall review and amend its Development Standards if necessary to require that all new development within the Village Build -out Plan demonstrate a reduction of domestic water consumption equivalent to the CalGreen Tier One standards in effect at the time of development. UTL -6 The City shall continue to implement its Water Efficient Landscape ordinance by requiring that development projects within the Village Build -out Plan implement water efficient landscaping plans to meet or exceed water efficiency standards. UTL -7 In conjunction with the Coachella Valley Water District as well as independently, the City shall develop programs to allow and encourage the retrofitting of existing water intensive appliances and irrigation systems for existing development within the Village Build -out Plan. UTL -8 The City shall continue to require that all new developments within the Village Build -out Plan use water conserving appliances and fixtures, including low -flush toilets and low -flow showerheads and faucets, as well as the application of water -conserving technologies in conformance with Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code, Title 20, California Administrative Code Section 1601(b), and applicable sections of Title 24 of the State Code. UTL -9 All new and existing commercial establishments within the Village Build -out Plan shall be required to comply with State mandates established under AB 341 to reduce the amount of packaging and potential waste associated with product manufacturing and sales. UTL - 10 The City shall continue to refer project developers to Burrtec for development of construction and demolition solid waste recycling plans in order to divert a minimum of 50% of C&D debris from the waste stream. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-22 August 2016 1034 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting A. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, each project development with between the City, and utility providers shall fulfill implementation of mitigation in regard to sanitary sewer service connections, water conservation methods and electrical power supply. (UTL-1 and UTL-2) Responsible Parties: Project Developer, City Engineer, Coachella Valley Water District. B. Immediately upon approval of the Village Build -out Plan, the City will create a tracking log to track projects and required utility infrastructure upgrades on order to identify when upgrades will be required. (UTL-3) Responsible Parties: Project Developer, Coachella Valley Water District, Imperial Irrigation District, City of La Quinta. C. During Site Plan review the Planning Department shall review all projects plans to ensure compliance with all of the latest applicable regulations for the reduction in the consumption of potable water. (UTL-4 through UTL-8) Responsible Parties: Project Developer, Planning Division. D. During grading, construction and other development activities, development projects shall fulfill mitigation in regard to solid waste reduction in compliance with AB 341. (UTL-9) Responsible Parties: Building Department and Code Enforcement. E. Operational activities for each commercial and residential establishment shall fulfill mitigation in regard to solid waste reduction in compliance with AB 341. (UTL-10) Responsible Parties: Landowner, Burrtec, Code Enforcement. 5.15.7 Level of Significance after Mitigation With implementation of Mitigation Measure USS-1 through USS-11, impacts in regard to Utilities and Service Systems will have a less than significant impact in the Village Build -out Plan project area. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-23 August 2016 1035 ATTACH M ENT 1 5.15 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 5.15-24 August 2016 1036 ATTACH M ENT 1 6 OTHER REQUIRED CEQA SECTIONS Chapter 6 Other CEQA Required Sections 6.1 Introduction Chapter 5, Environmental Impact Analysis evaluated the impacts of, and where necessary, proposed mitigation measures for, the impacts associated with the implementation of the proposed Village Build -out Plan on a project -specific and cumulative basis. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126 identifies other subjects pertaining to the consideration and discussion of environmental impacts that an EIR is also required to address. CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2 sets forth the content requirements for the discussion of these other subjects, including: • Significant Environmental Effects Which Cannot be Avoided if the Proposed Project is Implemented —Section 15126(b); • Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes Which Would be Caused by the Proposed Project Should it be Implemented — Section 15126(c); and, • Growth -Inducing Impact of the Proposed Project — Section 15126(d). In compliance with the aforementioned State CEQA Guidelines requirements, a discussion of each of the above subjects follows. 6.2 Significant Environmental Effects Which Cannot be Avoided State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(b) requires this subject to be addressed when impacts that cannot be alleviated without imposing an alternative design, their implications and the reasons why the project is being proposed, notwithstanding their effects should be described. 6.2.1 Air Quality Violate an Air Quality Standard The worst -case summer or winter VOC, NOx, CO, S02, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions created from the Village Build -out Plan long-term operations were calculated and summarized below in Table 6-1, Unmitigated Regional Operational Pollutant Emissions. The data provided in Table 6-1 shows that for the on -going operations activities within the project area, VOC, NOx, and CO emissions would exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance. Therefore, mitigation is required to reduce impacts from VOC, NO, and CO emissions. Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-9 are provided in Section 5.2, Air Quality, to reduce the operational emissions. These measures include: providing sidewalks to encourage pedestrian access to reduce the use of automobiles, compliance with the latest California Building Code Energy La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 6-1 August 2016 1037 ATTACH M ENT 1 6 OTHER REQUIRED CEQA SECTIONS Efficiency Standards, Energy Star appliances, etc. The mitigated operational regional criteria pollutant emissions are shown in Table 6-2, Mitigated Regional Operational Pollutant Emissions. Table 6-1 Unmitigated Regional Operational Pollutant Emissions Activity Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) vOc NOx c0 S02 PM10 PM2.5 Area Sources' 62.93 1.17 101.32 0.01 2.05 2.03 Energy Usage 0.55 4.76 2.23 0.03 0.38 0.38 Mobile Sources3 74.20 130.27 759.37 1.94 123.84 35.29 Total Emissions 137.68 136.20 862.92 1.97 126.27 37.70 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? Yes Yes Yes No No No Source: Air Quality & Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, Table 10, Kunzman Associates, March 2016 Notes: 1. Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. 2. Energy usage consists of emissions from generation of electricity and on -site natural gas usage. 3. Mobile sources consist of emissions from vehicles and road dust. Table 6-2 shows that even with incorporation of mitigation measures, VOC, NOx, and CO would still exceed the regional emissions thresholds (for detailed notes, see CalEEMod output in Appendix B of the Air Quality and Global Climate Change Analysis). Table 6-2 Mitigated Regional Operational Pollutant Emissions Activity Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) vOc NOx c0 S02 PM10 PM2.5 Area Sources' 53.62 1.17 101.32 0.01 2.05 2.03 Energy Usage 0.44 3.78 1.77 0.02 0.30 0.30 Mobile Sources3 69.69 97.95 651.33 1.19 73.28 21.00 Total Emissions 123.75 102.90 754.42 1.22 75.63 23.34 SCAQM D Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? Yes Yes Yes No No No Source: Air Quality & Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, Table 11, Kunzman Associates, March 2016 Notes: 1. Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. 2. Energy usage consists of emissions from generation of electricity and on -site natural gas usage. 3. Mobile sources consist of emissions from vehicles and road dust. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 6-2 August 2016 1038 ATTACH M ENT 1 6 OTHER REQUIRED CEQA SECTIONS The Air Quality analysis found that at the local level, within the project area, construction -related air quality impacts could be reduced to less than significant levels, through compliance with SCAQMD rules for the control of fugitive dust, for the maintenance of construction vehicles and equipment, and for the use of reduced VOC paints and solvents. However, despite implementation of mitigation measures for air emissions, significant unavoidable impacts will occur in regard to the project's contribution to the exceedance of air pollutant concentration (Criterion 1) and in exceedance with regional emissions thresholds during long term operation of land uses in the Village. The La Quinta General Plan 2035 Program EIR evaluated future conditions 20 years from now as the City builds out with a variety of residential and non-residential land uses. The Program EIR evaluated this scenario which included the Village area, although the Build -out Plan identifies a greater density and intensity of land uses in the Village than what was evaluated in the Program EIR. Still, the findings of the Program EIR were that air pollutants would be generated from a variety of activities, including vehicle emissions, and daily operations. Emissions generated by vehicular traffic are projected to be the greatest source of air pollutants. The use of natural gas and electricity for operation of existing and new buildings and structures will also result in the emission of air pollutants. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted with the adoption of the General Plan. Overriding considerations 3 and 4 specifically apply to Air Quality as follows: 3. Impacts identified as significant are generally associated with normal growth and progress and would be much more severe without implementation of the proposed General Plan update. 4. Implementation of the General Plan update will further enhance the quality of life necessary to attract new residents, businesses and visitors to the City, and will generally promote increased investment and development, jobs associated with new and/or expanded construction, and the provision of public services and facilities for a larger population base, and further economic development within the City. The La Quinta Village EIR will utilize these overriding conditions from the General Plan EIR. 6.2.2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, in exceedance of SCAQMD 2035 target Table 6-3, Year 2035 Mitigated Project -Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions, shows that the Village Build -out Plan's mitigated year 2035 emissions would be approximately 27,111.64 metric tons of CO2e per year; and at 5.3 MTCO2e/SP/year, would exceed the SCAQMD 2035 Target Service Population threshold of 3.0 MTCO2e/SP/year for projects. The mitigated emissions values also incorporate the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) - based land use and La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 6-3 August 2016 1039 ATTACH M ENT 1 6 OTHER REQUIRED CEQA SECTIONS site enhancement measures available for reductions through CalEEMod. However, as the mitigated project -related GHG emissions exceed the Tier 4 SCAQMD 2035 target service population threshold, impacts from project -related GHGs through implementation of the Village Build -out Plan are considered to be significant and unavoidable. Table 6-3 Year 2035 Mitigated Project -Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions Category Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons/Year) Bio-0O2 NonBio-CO2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Area Sources' 0.00 886.86 886.86 0.03 0.02 892.47 Energy Usage 0.00 9,612.40 9,612.40 0.22 0.06 9,634.36 Mobile Sources' 0.00 13,884.16 13,884.16 0.40 0.00 13,892.59 Solid Waste 142.68 0.00 142.68 8.43 0.00 319.76 Waters 35.38 1,364.21 1,399.59 3.66 0.09 1,505.15 Construction 0.00 866.03 866.03 0.06 0.00 867.31 Total Emissions 178.06 26,613.66 26,791.72 12.81 0.16 27,111.64 Project's Percent Reduction from 2005 Baseline 54.2 Percent Reduction Threshold from GHG Reduction Plan 28 Meets Reduction Threshold? Yes Emissions per Service Population (SP) 5.3 SCAQMD 2035 Target Service Population (SP) Threshold (MTCO2e/SP/year) 3.0 Exceeds Threshold? Yes Source: Inc. Air Quality & Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, Table 14, Kunzman Associates, March 2016 Notes: 1. Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscape equipment. 2. Energy usage consist of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage. 3. Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles. 4. Solid waste includes the CO2 and CH4 emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills. 5. Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for transport of water and processing of wastewater. 6. Construction GHG emissions CO2e based on opening year emissions and a 30 year amortization rate. Despite implementation of mitigation measures, significant unavoidable impacts will occur in regard to the development of future projects and the generation of GHG in exceedance of SCAQMD 2035 Target Service Population thresholds. The Village Build -out Plan is being proposed at the density of 1,230 new dwelling units, and up to 799,786 square feet of non-residential use in an effort to provide residents and visitors with an urban neighborhood where living, shopping and working can be interconnected, and where people visiting the Village can park and walk, thus reducing dependence on automobiles and reducing emissions of La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 6-4 August 2016 1040 ATTACH M ENT 1 6 OTHER REQUIRED CEQA SECTIONS GHG. The City believes that the Village Build -out Plan will ultimately result in a reduction in air emissions and generation of greenhouse gasses as shown in Section 5.6, Greenhouse Gasses. With mitigation and compliance with regulation (such as Pavley, the Renewable Energy Standard, compliance with Green Building Standards, and 2013 Title 24 standards [approximately 25 percent more efficient than 2008 Title 24 standards for residential uses) etc.], the Village Build -out Plan year 2035 mitigated emissions would be reduced by 54.2 percent from baseline (2005) emissions; which meets the City of La Quinta GHG Reduction Plan threshold of a 28 percent reduction from baseline emissions by 2035. The Plan included an inventory of GHG emissions establishing 2005 as the baseline year and projecting future year emissions based on 2005 emission levels. The Plan then set reduction targets with the goal of reducing CO2e emissions to 10 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 and 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2035. The City's GHG Reduction Plan is in keeping with the goals of California Assembly Bill 32: the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32), and SB 375 which focuses on reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and urban sprawl, and SCAG's Sustainability Communities Strategy. AB 32 was the nation's first law to limit greenhouse gas emissions and SB 375 was enacted thereafter to more specifically address the transportation and land use components of greenhouse gas emissions. SCAG's Strategy is a blueprint for integrating transportation and land use near existing main streets, downtowns and commercial corridors (SCAG 2012-2025 Sustainability Communities Strategy. Therefore, although the Village Build -out Plan would result in significant impacts associated with the generation of Greenhouse Gas emissions using conventional models, the City believes, that build -out in the Village including non -motorized transportation opportunities, increased transit (bus and shuttle service), and completion of the pedestrian network within a compact Village, will result in a reduction in air emissions and the generation of greenhouse gas emissions. However, because these strategies are not yet in place to quantify, a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted for Greenhouse Gas as well as Air Quality. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted with the adoption of the General Plan. Overriding considerations 3 and 4 specifically apply to Greenhouse Gasses as follows: 3. Impacts identified as significant are generally associated with normal growth and progress and would be much more severe without implementation of the proposed General Plan update. 4. Implementation of the General Plan update will further enhance the quality of life necessary to attract new residents, businesses and visitors to the City, and will generally promote increased investment and development, jobs associated with new and/or expanded construction, and the provision of public services and facilities for a larger population base, and further economic development within the City. The La Quinta Village EIR will utilize these overriding conditions from the General Plan EIR. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 6-5 August 2016 1041 ATTACH M ENT 1 6 OTHER REQUIRED CEQA SECTIONS 6.2.3 Traffic and Circulation The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the Village Build -out Plan considered future conditions without and with the project for an Interim Year (2021) and at build -out (2035). The TIA found that with the implementation of mitigation measures outlined in Section 5.14, Traffic and Circulation, all intersections within the TIA study area are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours for General Plan Buildout With Project traffic conditions. The TIA also analyzed roadway segments in the study area for both the Interim Year and the Build - out Year. For the General Plan Buildout With Project scenario, roadway segments are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service with the exception of the following roadway segments: • Washington Street between Avenue 48 and Eisenhower Drive (Level of Service F); • Calle Tampico between Desert Club Drive and Washington Street (Level of Service E). Although implementation of mitigation measures and Citywide Transportation Demand Management and Transportation Systems Management measures would help reduce impacts to these roadways, impacts cannot be fully mitigate. Therefore, the proposed project is forecast to result in a potentially significant and unavoidable traffic impact along this roadway segments for General Plan Buildout With Project conditions. As with Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas, a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted with the adoption of the General Plan. Overriding considerations 3 and 4 specifically apply to Traffic and Circulation as follows: 3. Impacts identified as significant are generally associated with normal growth and progress and would be much more severe without implementation of the proposed General Plan update. 4. Implementation of the General Plan update will further enhance the quality of life necessary to attract new residents, businesses and visitors to the City, and will generally promote increased investment and development, jobs associated with new and/or expanded construction, and the provision of public services and facilities for a larger population base, and further economic development within the City. The La Quinta Village EIR will utilize these overriding conditions from the General Plan EIR. 6.3 Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(c), as clarified by the provisions of State CEQA Guidelines Section15127 requires this subject to be addressed: "Only in EIRs prepared in connection with any of the following activities: (a) the adoption, amendment, enactment of a plan, policy or ordinance of a public agency..." La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 6-6 August 2016 1042 ATTACH M ENT 1 6 OTHER REQUIRED CEQA SECTIONS Because the Village Build -out Plan is such a plan, a discussion of significant irreversible environmental changes is required. These changes include the commitment of non-renewable resources to uses that future generations will probably be unable to reverse, or providing public access to previously inaccessible areas. The commitment of resources must be evaluated to assure that such consumption now is justified. This discussion is also related to the broader discussion of energy conservation described in CEQA Appendix F, where it states that "an EIR should consider the potentially significant energy implications of a project." The issue of providing public access to previously inaccessible areas is not germane to the implementation of Village Build -out Plan because the project area is located within an existing urban setting surrounded on all sides by urban development. The project area itself is also developed with urban uses. Therefore, the focus of this discussion is on the commitment of non-renewable resources to uses that future generations will probably be unable to reverse. The project area is an existing 137-acre urban area that is partially developed with a mix of residential and non-residential uses. The Village Build - out Plan calls for the development of up to 1,230 new multi -family residences, and up to 799,786 square feet of non-residential uses (commercial retail and office, restaurants, and professional office space in a compact project area where increased density would come from the relaxing of the Zoning Ordinance to allow for increased building heights, and parcels could be combined to create larger developable lots. The major non-renewable resources generally considered in such a discussion include water, electricity, and construction materials (aggregate, wood products, etc.). Water Supply Resources CVWD serves as the water provider for the City of La Quinta. Water supplies that serve the existing La Quinta Planning Area are derived from groundwater in storage and imported Colorado River water and State Water Project (SWP) exchange water. All urban water demands are currently met through groundwater supplies. New water demands generated by proposed development in the Village Build - out Plan project area will be met through a combination of groundwater, imported supplies, and reclaimed water. CVWD expects to have sufficient water supplies to serve development in the La Quinta Planning Area including the Village Build -out Plan project area through 2035 and beyond by utilizing a combination of water supply sources and treating surface water supplies to potable quality standards. CVWD projects that, in 2035, the urban water demand will be supplied by a total of 242,700 acre-feet per year consisting of 53 percent groundwater, 20 percent treated Colorado River Water, 22 percent untreated Colorado River Water, and 4 percent desalinated agricultural drain water. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 6-7 August 2016 1043 ATTACH M ENT 1 6 OTHER REQUIRED CEQA SECTIONS CVWD's current UWMP provides long term water supply/demand planning in an effort to protect water resources, preserve water quality, and assure that water supplies are available to meet demands. CVWD's UWMP evaluated water demands relative to supplies for the period between 2010 and 2035 under normal, single, and multiple dry year conditions. The current UWMP finds that with groundwater supplies, imported water supplies, water conservation programs, and recharge activity water supplies are sufficient to meet demands during normal, single, and multiple dry year conditions through 2035. New development within the La Quinta General Plan Planning Area, including the Village Build -out Plan project area, will result in an increase in the demand for water of approximately 6,555 acre-feet within City Limits and 15,416 acre-feet within the Sphere of Influence by 2035. This new demand will be met by groundwater, imported Colorado River water, desalinated agricultural drain water, or a combination thereof. As described above, CVWD has accounted for this increased water demand in conjunction with all other projected water demands within the service area. CVWD has determined that through utilization of a combination of water supply sources including the need to provide expanded availability of tertiary treated water, and coordination by the City in implementing CVWD UWMP regulations, sufficient water supplies will therefore be available to meet demands in 2035 and also maintain consistency with General Plan Policy UTL-1.1 and Program UTL-1.1a. As such, the level of additional water supplies needed to meet demands generated by development within the Village Build -out Plan will not substantially deplete groundwater reserves or interfere with groundwater recharge. The City of La Quinta relies on CVWD to manage and supply water resources. Nonetheless, the City is committed to promoting water conservation and achieving water savings, protecting groundwater reserves, and preserving groundwater quality. In the Village Build -out Plan, water conservation can be achieved through retrofitting of existing water -intensive appliances with the installation of water efficient appliances, implementation of water efficient landscaping plans for all new development, the use of new technology, and advanced irrigation control for outdoor landscaping. Mitigation Measures HWQ-4 through HWQ-10 in Section 5.8, Hydrology and Water Quality, will ensure that impacts in regard to water supply are reduced to less than significant levels. These measures are also repeated as UTL-4 through UTL-10 found in Section 5.15, Utilities and Service Systems. Electricity IID's Energy Department provides electric power to more than 150,000 customers in its service area. As the third largest public power utility in California, IID controls more than 1,100 megawatts of energy derived from a diverse resource portfolio that includes its own generation, and long- and short-term power purchases. IID benefits greatly from being located in what has been referred to as the "renewable energy capital of the world," and currently produces 30 percent of its power locally, from hydroelectric facilities, La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 6-8 August 2016 1044 ATTACH M ENT 1 6 OTHER REQUIRED CEQA SECTIONS steam generation facilities, and natural gas turbines. IID continues to identify ways to enhance its energy infrastructure to be able to move renewable energy generated in the Imperial Valley to other areas. IID has an aggressive transmission expansion plan and, over the next five years, intends to invest $1 billion in its energy infrastructure, which includes building a state-of-the-art energy battery storage unit in El Centro, which would provide back-up energy resources but also help the IID grid integrate the many megawatts of solar energy entering the IID grid during the day. IID responded to the Notice of Preparation of the Draft EIR. The issues of concern for IID were not related to the amount of energy that would be required for the project, but rather, the potential effects future projects may have on its existing facilities and easements. IID is confident that because of their unique location in the Imperial and Coachella valleys, and continued efforts to bring more renewable energy on-line, there is adequate energy available in its service area. Construction Materials Construction materials consist of sand and gravel and related Portland cement concrete and asphalt concrete; as well as lumber and related wood products. The project area is in close proximity to a number of aggregate mining operations and aggregate product manufacturing for the construction industry. There are several sites north of the 1-10 freeway at the terminus of Monroe Street and along Dillon Road, north of the City of Indio. According to the State Mining and Geology Board, the anticipated consumption of aggregate in the Palm Springs Production -Consumption (P-C) Region through 2056 is estimated to be 307 million tons of which 45 percent, or 138 tons, must be Portland concrete cement (PCC) quality. This is nearly double the previous 50-year consumption estimate made by the State. Approximately 10 percent, or 911 acres of the 9,094 acres of land designated by SMGB in 1989 has been lost to land uses incompatible with mining. However, an additional 6,638 acres of land containing an estimated 472 million tons of PCC-grade aggregate resources have been identified in the Palm Springs P-C Region. The Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) requires that a municipality be responsible for diverting at least 50 percent of solid waste from landfills. This has been done through recycling and reuse efforts including separating recyclables, and reusing construction materials. The most common construction materials to be recycled and reused are PCC and asphalt concrete (AC). These materials can be processed and reused as roadbed or integrated into AC for road projects. Other materials include lumber and wallboard that can be ground up and used as feedstock for composting into soil amendment products or groundcover. Recycling of used construction materials would likely extend the consumption estimate for aggregate. Regarding lumber, sustainable forest management practices have evolved to meet the demand for forest products while balancing the values people attach to forests and the need for a stable supply of wood -based building products. Practices include better management techniques for harvesting La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 6-9 August 2016 1045 ATTACH M ENT 1 6 OTHER REQUIRED CEQA SECTIONS and replanting trees to continually renew the resource, understanding that lumber is one of the main elements in most buildings that will be constructed in the project area. 6.4 Growth Inducing Impacts State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(d) provides the following guidance when discussing this subject in an EIR: "Discuss the ways in which the proposed project could foster economic or population growth, or the construction of additional housing, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment." The Village Build -out Plan project area is a unique area in the City of La Quinta and development within the project area will occur within the 137-acre project area. The Plan is consistent with existing land use designations and it is the City's intent to build -out the project area with a mix of urban uses both residential and non-residential to create an accessible area conducive to walking and biking that reduces dependence on the automobile. From this perspective, the project would be growth inducing as the City is encouraging new development in the Village, an area already served by roads and utilities. The project area is developed and is surrounded by residential land uses so infrastructure, including roads and wet/dry utilities are already in place. Therefore, the project would not extend any roads or utilities into a new area not already served that would be considered growth inducing. 6.5 Effects Found not to be Significant The Initial Study prepared for the project in conjunction with the Notice of Preparation, identified a number of environmental issues that would not be affected by the proposed Village Build -out Plan. These are listed herein. 6.5.1 Aesthetics All Impacts are discussed within Section 5.1 of the EIR. 6.5.2 Agriculture and Forestry a. Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance The La Quinta Village is within an area of Urban and Built Up land on the Riverside County Important Farmland Map prepared under the State's Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. Implementation of the Build -Out Plan would not impact any Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 6-10 August 2016 1046 ATTACH M ENT 1 6 OTHER REQUIRED CEQA SECTIONS b. Agricultural Zoning and Williamson Act The La Quinta Village area is zoned Village Commercial, Neighborhood Commercial and Major Public Facilities in the City's zoning ordinance, which does not include agricultural use, and no parcels within the Build -out Plan area are designated as Williamson Act lands. Implementation of the Build -Out Plan would not impact any agricultural land use within the City. c-d. Forest Lands and Timberlands There is no forest land or timberland within the Build -out Plan area, so build -out of the La Quinta Village would have no impact on forest land or timberland. There would be no impact to agriculture and forestry resources as a result of the build -out of the La Quinta Village. e. Conversion of Farmland or Forestland to non-agricultural use Due to the fact that there is no farmland or forest land located within the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan area, development of the project will not convert any existing farmland or timber land to non- agricultural uses. 6.5.3 Air Quality All Impacts are discussed within Section 5.2 of the EIR. 6.5.4 Biological Resources All Impacts are discussed within Section 5.3 of the EIR. 6.5.5 Cultural Resources All Impacts are discussed within Section 5.4 of the EIR. 6.5.6 Geology and Soils All Impacts are discussed within Section 5.5 of the EIR. 6.5.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions All Impacts are discussed within Section 5.6 of the EIR. 6.5.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials All Impacts are discussed within Section 5.7 of the EIR. 6.5.9 Hydrology and Water Quality All Impacts are discussed within Section 5.8 of the EIR. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 6-11 August 2016 1047 ATTACH M ENT 1 6 OTHER REQUIRED CEQA SECTIONS 6.5.10 Land Use and Planning All Impacts are discussed within Section 5.9 of the EIR. 6.5.11 Mineral Resources a-b. Mineral Resources of Statewide Significance and Local Importance The California Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA) recognizes the loss of regionally significant mineral deposits and requires the Department of Conservation to create Production - Consumption Regions, which are areas where significant mineral resources of statewide importance and regional significance are produced and consumed. The project is located with Mineral Resource Zone 1 (MRZ-1), which includes areas where adequate information indicated that no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence. Since the project is located within a previously disturbed, urban area that would not support mining activities, and no mineral deposits are anticipated to be present, the build -out of the Village would have no impact on mineral resources. 6.5.12 Noise All Impacts are discussed within Section 5.10 of the EIR. 6.5.13 Population and Housing All Impacts are discussed within Section 5.11 of the EIR. 6.5.14 Public Services All Impacts are discussed within Section 5.12 of the EIR. 6.5.15 Recreation All Impacts are discussed within Section 5.13 of the EIR. 6.5.16 Traffic and Circulation All Impacts are discussed within Section 5.14 of the EIR. 6.5.17 Utilities and Services All Impacts are discussed within Section 5.15 of the EIR. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR Page 6-12 August 2016 1048 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Chapter 7 Alternatives to the Proposed Project 7.1 Introduction This Chapter identifies alternatives to the proposed project pursuant to the provisions of Section 15126.6 of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended. Section 15126.6(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines states that: "An EIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. An EIR needs to not consider every conceivable alternative to a project. Rather it must consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that will foster informed decision making and public participation .... There is no ironclad rule governing the nature or scope of the alternatives to be discussed other than the rule of reason." 7.1.1 Consideration in Selecting Alternatives to the Proposed Project State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15126.6 (b) through (f) articulates the key considerations pertaining to, and requirements for, the preparation of the alternatives analysis in an EIR. Key components of the State CEQA Guidelines sections that are relevant to the proposed project addressed in this EIR are summarized below: • Section 15126.6(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended, states: "... the discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives to the project or its location,... even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives, or would be more costly..." • Section 15126.6(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended, states: "The EIR should also identify any alternatives that were considered by the Lead Agency but were rejected as infeasible during the scoping process and briefly explain the reasons underlying the Lead Agency's determination..." • Section 15126.6(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended, states: "The EIR shall include sufficient information about each alternative to allow meaningful evaluation, analysis, and comparison with the proposed project. A matrix displaying the major characteristics and significant effects of each alternative may be used to summarize the comparison. If an alternative would cause one or more significant effects in addition to those that would be caused by the project as proposed, the significant effects of the alternative shall be discussed, but in less detail than the significant effects of the project as proposed..." La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-1 August 2016 1049 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT • Section 15126.6(e)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended, states: "The specific alternative of "no project" shall also be evaluated along with its impact. The purpose of describing and analyzing a no project alternative is to allow decision makers to compare the impacts of approving the proposed project with the impacts of not approving the proposed project..." • Section 15126.6(e)(2) of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended, states: "The "no project" analysis shall discuss the existing conditions at the time the notice of preparation is published... as well as what would be reasonably expected to occur in the foreseeable future if the project were not approved ... If the environmentally superior alternative is the "no project" alternative, the EIR shall also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives..." • State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e)(3)(A) states: "When the project is the revision of an existing ongoing operation, the "no project" alternative will be the continuation of the existing operation into the future..." • State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(f)(3) states: "Rule of reason. An EIR need not consider an alternative whose effects cannot be reasonably ascertained and whose implementation is remote and speculative." 7.1.2 Development of Alternatives for Analysis Pursuant to the provisions of the aforementioned sections of the State CEQA Guidelines, a range of feasible alternatives to the proposed Village Build -out Plan is considered and evaluated in this EIR. The discussion in this chapter provides the following: 1. A description of the alternatives considered and rejected. 2. A description of the alternatives considered as feasible and evaluated herein. 3. Comparative analysis of each alternative that focuses on the potentially significant unavoidable environmental impacts of the proposed project. The purpose of this analysis is to determine whether alternatives are capable of eliminating or substantially reducing the project's significant environmental impacts. 4. Conclusions regarding the ability of an alternative to: a) avoid or substantially lessen the significant unavoidable impacts of the project; b) the ability of an alternative to attain most of the basic project objectives; and c) the merits and feasibility of an alternative compared to the merits of the proposed project. The alternatives to the proposed project discussed in this EIR are: • Alternative 1: Build -out Under the Existing Zoning Ordinance and Village Design Guidelines • Alternative 2: Reduced Density and Intensity of Uses in the Village La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-2 August 2016 1050 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT 7.2 Project Description and Objectives 7.2.1 Project Description The proposed project is the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan that identifies future development opportunities in the project area; and assumes development of the remaining vacant properties, as well as redevelopment of underutilized properties with more intensive uses. This would include residential development at densities of 20-30 dwelling units per acre, which is higher than the density allowed under the City's High Density Residential designation, up to 16 dwelling units per acre. The Village Commercial zoning designation allows multifamily residential dwellings such as condominiums, apartments and similar housing types at densities determined on a site specific basis, based on the development capacity for the proposed uses on the site. The planning commission ultimately determines the density of a proposed project (Municipal Code Section 9.65.020). However, for the purposes of this discussion, the maximum 16 du/ac was used for comparison with the proposed Village Build -out Plan. Table 7-1, New and Potential Development Opportunities in the Project Area, lists new land uses that could be developed on the vacant parcels, and potential land uses that could be developed on the underutilized properties. Table 7-1 New and Potential Development in the Project Area Existing Potential Existing New Non - Land Use Acres Residential New Non- Residential Units Residential Residential Square TOTAL (DU)1 Units (DU) Square Feet Feet Vacant Land 20.70 -- 436 -- 288,330 -- Land with the Potential for 30.20 33 794 12,400 511,456 -- Redevelopment Existing Developed Properties with no Change in Land Use 85.90 251 -- 139,525 -- or Increased Density 284 DU 1,481 DU, 290 +290 hotel hotel/ casita Total 136.74 1,230 DU 151,925 799,786 rooms & 960,711 casitas square feet Source: City of La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Land Use Data, August 2015. Notes: 1. Residential unit count includes existing residences 2. Unit count represents 251 units in "Existing Developed Properties with no Change in Land Use or Increased Density" but not the 33 units in "Land with the Potential for Redevelopment". La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-3 August 2016 1051 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT 7.2.2 Build -Out Schedule The City's planning effort is focused on streamlining the regulatory process and facilitating a broad range of uses; developing a build -out scenario that addresses maximum potential commercial square footage and dwelling units; developing a network of public spaces and pedestrian, bike, and golf cart routes throughout the area; and assuring that infrastructure is planned to accommodate build -out. The street grid is in place, and no major changes are anticipated. The City's General Plan was adopted in 2013 and focused on the next 20+ years, through 2035. It is the City's intent to allow the Village area to continue to develop through market forces including demand for additional housing, commercial uses, and professional office space. For example, the Villas at Old Town, a mixed -use project approved in 2015, consists of 20,000 square feet of ground floor retail space, underground parking, and 84 condominiums above, to be built in two phases on an approximately 3.5-acre site at the southeast corner of Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive. This project is included in the build -out calculations shown in Table 7-1. 7.2.3 Project Objectives The City's goal is to continue to develop the Village as a livable and sustainable neighborhood - reminiscent of older cities - where land uses are more interconnected, compact, and offer a mix of uses, providing opportunities for people to live, work, and shop within the neighborhood. In order to achieve this goal, a number of objectives have been identified based on the concept of mixed - use. The City's objectives in proposing the Village Build -out Plan are as follows: • Continue the development of the Village as a mixed use neighborhood by encouraging additional residential and commercial development. • Ensure that public facilities and infrastructure are adequate to support the increase in intensity of land uses in the Village. • Capitalize on unique development opportunities in the Village area by focusing on shopping, dining, entertainment, professional and mixed use options while improving the aesthetics of the community. • Enforce development standards that: 1) create attractive, useable and safe public spaces; and 2) promote safe indoor and outdoor spaces and provide emergency services that are adequately funded, staffed, and equipped to provide timely responses. 7.3 Impacts of the Proposed Project Chapter 5, Environmental Impact Analysis, evaluated the potential impacts associated with implementation of the proposed Village Build -out Plan. The conclusion of the EIR is that there are a La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-4 August 2016 1052 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT number of potentially significant impacts that can be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of: 1) development standards; 2) performance standards; or 3) mitigation measures. These are summarized in Table 7-2, Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures. 7.4 Alternatives to the Proposed Project 7.4.1 Alternatives Considered and Rejected from Further Analysis 7.4.1.1 No Project — No Development Alternative CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e) specifically addresses the requirement to discuss a No Project alternative with the option to evaluate one of two scenarios: 1) when a project is a revision to an existing land use or regulatory plan, policy or ongoing operation the no -project alternative would be the continuation of the existing plan, policy or operation into the future; or 2) if the project is other than a land use or regulatory plan, such as a development project, the no -project alternative is the circumstance under which the project does not proceed. In certain circumstances, the no project alternative is a no build scenario where the existing environmental setting is maintained. Scenario 1 is evaluated in Section 7.4.3 — Alternative 1 — No Project - Buildout Under the Existing Zoning Ordinance and La Quinta Village Design Guidelines. Scenario 2, the No Project/No Development Alternative was rejected because the Village is an existing Commercial District that is currently developed with a number of residential, commercial, professional office, and public facilities uses, but still has a number of vacant and underutilized properties that could be developed. Therefore, an analysis where the existing environmental setting is maintained, is not a logical alternative to the proposed Village Build -out Plan. 7.4.1.2 Increased Density Alternative In studying the optimum build -out scenario for the Village, the City of La Quinta considered varying densities of residential and non-residential uses. One such alternative was to develop the project area with an additional 799,786 square feet of non-residential uses and up to 40 dwelling units to the acre where the proposed Build -out Plan calls for a maximum of 25 to 30 dwelling units to the acre. This alternative was considered and rejected because it would require an increase in the height of buildings greater than the 60 feet proposed in the Build -out Plan, in order to reach the density of 40 dwelling units to the acre, which would be incompatible with the character of the Village. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-5 August 2016 1053 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-2 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures Potential Impacts on Level of Significance after Mitigation Measures the environment Mitigation 5.1 Aesthetics Light and glare AES-1 Compliance with the City's Outdoor Lighting Ordinance of the Municipal Less than significant Code (Section 9.100.150). 5.2 Air Quality Air emissions during long- Construction Significant and Unavoidable term operation AQ-1 During construction, all development project are subject SCAQMD Rules for the control of fugitive dust, maintenance of construction vehicles and equipment, and for the use of reduced VOC asphalt, architectural coatings and solvents Operation AQ-2 Install ENERGY STAR -compliant appliances. AQ-3 Install high -efficiency lighting that is at least 10% more efficient than standard lighting. AQ-4- Compliance with SCAQMD Rule 1186 for street sweepers and providing a menu of options for employers to reduce emissions generated by employee commutes. AQ-5 Connect and improve sidewalks within each project boundary and along the off -site roadway improvements. AQ-6 Meet or exceed California Building Code Energy Efficiency Standards. AQ-7 Install water fixtures that would reduce indoor water demand by 20 percent per CalGreen Standards. AQ-8 Prepare and implement recycling programs that reduce waste to landfills by a minimum of 75 percent. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-6 August 2016 1054 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-1 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on Mitigation Measures Level of Significance after the environment Mitigation AQ-9 Use paints and coatings with a VOC content lower than SCAQMD Rule 1113. 5.3 Biological Resources Avian species including 1310-1 Preconstruction for Burrowing Owl at each vacant site prior to any site Less than significant burrowing owl disturbance. BIO-2 Removal of any existing mature trees located on a project site shall be preceded by the completion of an avian nesting survey. BIO-3 Project payments of CVMSHCP Mitigation Fee. 5.4 Cultural Resources Historic buildings, and CR-1 Demolition or extensive alteration of the building at 78035-78039 Calle Less than significant unknown buried resources Estado should be avoided. Overriding considerations to justify the loss of the or human remains building would need to be developed were demolition pursued. CR-2 If redevelopment of the parcel occurs, the design of any new construction adjacent to this one-story Spanish Colonial Revival -style commercial building must be compatible in design, scale, massing, and appearance as stated in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. CR-3 The design of any new construction adjacent to the one- and two-story Spanish Colonial and Monterey Revival -style historic resources at 78023 Calle Estado, 77895 Avenida Montezuma, 77885 Avenida Montezuma, and 51001 Eisenhower Drive, shall be compatible in design, scale, massing, and appearance as required by the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. CR-4 The design of any new construction within the Village Build -Out Plan Area adjacent to the residences of the La Quinta Cove Thematic Historic District shall be compatible in design, scale, massing, and appearance with existing historical commercial buildings in the Village Commercial zone. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-7 August 2016 1055 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-2 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on Mitigation Measures Level of Significance after the environment Mitigation 5.4 Cultural Resources (continued) CR-5 Due to the sensitivity of the area for native American resources, grading/construction shall be monitoring by a qualified archaeologist and Native American monitor. CR-6 Due to the sensitivity of the area for paleontological resources, a qualified vertebrate paleontologist shall be retained prior to the start of construction of a development project, but after final depths of impacts are known (from grading plans), to develop a paleontological mitigation plan limited to the proposed deep impact areas. CR-7 In the event that human remains are uncovered, no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98. 5.5 Geology and Soils Seismicity GEO-1 Build in accordance with the latest version of the California Building Code Less than significant (CBC). GEO-2 Applicants of new development including redevelopment involving changes to structural building size shall be required to prepare a detailed geotechnical and soils analysis that includes soil sampling, laboratory testing and mitigation measures intended to reduce potential geotechnical hazards to less than significant levels. 5.6 Global Climate Change GHG emissions during long- GHG-1 Project applicants shall provide sidewalks within the project boundary and Significant and Unavoidable term operation along the off -site roadway improvements where these are lacking. GHG-2 Project applicants shall ensure that all building structures meet or exceed 2013 Title 24, Part 6 Standards and meet Green Building Code Standards, or more stringent standards if in place at the time building permits are issued. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR August 2016 1056 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-2 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on Mitigation Measures Level of Significance after the environment Mitigation 5.6 Global Climate Change (continued) GHG-3 Project applicants shall ensure that all faucets, toilets and showers installed in the proposed structures utilize low -flow fixtures that would reduce indoor water demand by 20 percent per CalGreen Standards to the satisfaction of the Building Department. GHG-4 Project applicants shall ensure that ENERGY STAR -compliant appliances are installed where appliances are required on -site. GHG-5 Project applicants shall implement recycling programs that reduce waste to landfills by a minimum of 75 percent. GHG-6 Project applicants shall install high -efficiency lighting be installed that is at least 10 percent more efficient than standard lighting. GHG-7 To the extent feasible, project applicants shall use paints and coatings with a VOC content lower than SCAQMD Rule 1113 requires for application to surfaces of residential dwelling units and commercial units within project boundaries. 5.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Transport, storage, use or HAZ-1 All new development projects that propose the use, transport or storage of Less than significant disposal of hazardous hazardous materials in their plan of operations and are defined as a new materials generator of hazardous materials shall comply with all local, state, and federal regulations, as required by law. HAZ-2 All new development that proposes the storage and use of hazardous materials at or above reporting criteria thresholds shall prepare a Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan (HMBEP). La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-9 August 2016 1057 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-2 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on Mitigation Measures Level of Significance after the environment Mitigation 5.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials (continued) HAZ-3 All new development projects that propose the use and storage of hazardous materials will be required to prepare a Spill Prevention Counter measurement Contingency Plan (SPCA. HAZ-4 All project development proposals shall submit plans to the Fire Department for review and conditioning for safe accessibility of fire and ambulatory services and for appropriate evacuation routing of the project development in the event of an emergency. HAZ-5 All project development proposals shall submit plans to the Fire Department for review and conditioning for safe accessibility of fire and ambulatory services and for appropriate evacuation routing of the project development in the event of an emergency. HWQ-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits on vacant or underutilized parcels that will be developed within the Village Build -out Plan, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared for all projects within the Village Build -out Plan that disturb one acre or more. 5.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials (continued) Potential for pollutants to HWQ-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits on vacant or underutilized parcels mix with stormwater and that will be developed within the Village Build -out Plan, a Storm Water enter the storm drain Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared for all projects within system the Village Build -out Plan that disturb one acre or more. HWQ-2 Prior to the issuance of building permits on vacant parcels within the Village Build -out Plan project area, a WQMP for post construction conditions shall list appropriate best management practices (BMPs) for the control and treatment of runoff from the project site. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-10 August 2016 1058 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-2 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on the environment Mitigation Measures Level of Significance after Mitigation Hydrology and Water Quality (continued) Potential for new HWQ-3 The City of La Quinta is responsible for constructing improvements to the development to increase storm drain evacuation system in the Village Build -out project area. These impervious surfaces and improvements must be made prior to commencement of development of increase runoff and new projects in the project area, proposed after adoption of the Build -out Plan. Potential for developed HWQ-4 Prior to project construction of new projects on vacant lands, or properties to be affected redevelopment projects on currently developed parcels, the project by flooding during a major applicant shall pay a DIF specific towards funding of improvements. storm event HWQ-5 All project development within the Village Build -out Plan shall coordinate Increase in groundwater and cooperate with CVWD to ensure City-wide compliance with current usage with increase in State Senate Bill x7-7 to reduce per capita urban water use by 36 percent urban uses for year 2016, and 20 percent reduction by year 2020. HWQ-5 All project development within the Village Build -out Plan shall coordinate and cooperate with CVWD to ensure City-wide compliance with current State Senate Bill x7-7 to reduce per capita urban water use by 36 percent for year 2016, and 20 percent reduction by year 2020. HWQ-6 The City shall review and amend its Development Standards to require that all new development within the Village Build -out Plan demonstrate a reduction of domestic water consumption equivalent to the CalGreen Tier One standards in effect at the time of development. HWQ-7 The City shall continue to implement its Water Efficient Landscape ordinance by requiring that development projects within the Village Build - out Plan implement water efficient landscaping plans to meet or exceed current water efficiency standards. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-11 August 2016 1059 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-2 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on Level of Significance after Mitigation Measures the environment Mitigation 5.8 Hydrology and Water Quality (continued) HWQ-8 The City shall require that new development within the Village Build -out Plan reduce its projected water consumption over "business as usual" consumption rates. HWQ-9 The City shall develop programs to allow and encourage the retrofitting of existing water intensive appliances and irrigation systems for existing development within the Village Build -out Plan. HWQ-10 The City shall continue to require that all new developments within the Village Build -out Plan use water conserving appliances and fixtures, in conformance with Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code, Title 20, California Administrative Code Section 1601(b), and applicable sections of Title 24 of the State Code. 5.9 Land Use Increased parking demand LU-1 The City will implement a set of parking management strategies, parking Less than significant supply strategies, and zoning/administration strategies beginning with those identified in Table 5.9-4. 5.10 Noise Noise associated with N0I-1 Noise Impact Analysis shall be required in conjunction with entitlement Less than significant increased traffic and applications projects proposed within the La Quinta Village Build -out Plan population in the Village area. The study shall analyze noise levels within the proposed project, and include mitigation measures to assure that the exterior noise levels meet the City's standards. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-12 August 2016 1060 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-2 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on Mitigation Measures Level of Significance after the environment Mitigation 5.10 Noise (continued) N0I-2 Truck deliveries to businesses in the project area that are adjacent to sensitive land uses shall be limited to daylight hours, or shall provide noise mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts. 5.11 Population and Housing Creation of new housing None required Less than significant opportunities 5.12 Public Services (continued) PS-1 The City and Riverside County Fire Department shall continue to confer and coordinate to ensure that facilities and services within the Village Build -out Plan are expanded in a timely manner. PS-2 The Riverside County Fire Department shall continue to review and evaluate new development proposals and project plans within the Village Build -out Plan to make certain that it can provide adequate fire protection. PS-3 All new development projects within the Village Build -out Plan shall be subject to Police Department review to assure that within the Village Build -out Plan the Department can provide adequate police protection. PS-4 The City shall monitor City population and Police Department staffing levels to ensure the provision of police protection services at sufficient levels. PS-5 Development projects within the Village Build -out Plan shall be assessed statutory school mitigation fees, in place at the time residential and commercial projects are proposed. PS-6 Development projects within the Village Build -out Plan shall be assessed statutory library mitigation fees, in place at the time residential and non- residential projects are proposed. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-13 August 2016 1061 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-2 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on Mitigation Measures Level of Significance after the environment Mitigation 5.13 Recreation Increased demand on parks None required with payment of Development Impact Fees. and recreation 5.14 Transportation and Traffic (continued) Increased traffic in the The following mitigation measures are recommended for Interim Year With Project Less than significant vicinity traffic conditions: CIR-1 Washington Street/Avenida La Fonda (#13): Construct a raised "worm" median to allow northbound left -turns and restrict eastbound left -turns. CIR-2 Jefferson Street/Avenue 52 (#16): Reconstruct the existing roundabout to provide two circulating lanes and two entry lanes at the northbound and southbound approaches. The following Mitigation Measures are recommended for General Plan Buildout With Project traffic conditions: CIR-3 Eisenhower Drive/Avenida Montezuma (#3): Convert Eisenhower Drive/Avenida Montezuma from an all -way stop control to a yield -controlled roundabout [this improvement is assumed in the Village Buildout Circulation Plan]. CIR-4 Washington Street/Avenue 48 (#9): Construct the northbound approach to consist of three through lanes and one right -turn lane. Remove the pedestrian crosswalk at the north leg of the intersection. Based on the City's traffic study guidelines, the following circulation improvements are recommended in addition to the roadway improvements identified in the current General Plan Circulation Element: La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-14 August 2016 1062 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-2 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on the environment Mitigation Measures Level of Significance after Mitigation 5.14 Transportation and Traffic (continued) CIR-5 Eisenhower Drive / Calle Tampico (#2): Construct one additional westbound left -turn lane to provide dual left -turn lanes. CIR-6 Avenida Bermudas/Calle Tampico (#5): Construct one additional westbound left -turn lane, or construct a roundabout per Village Build -out Plan TIA. CIR-7 Desert Club Drive / Calle Tampico (#7): Construct one exclusive northbound right -turn lane and one additional westbound left -turn lane, or construct a roundabout per Village Build -out Plan TIA. CIR-8 Washington Street/Avenue 48 (#9): Construct one exclusive northbound right -turn lane. CIR-9 Washington Street/Avenue 52 (#14): Construct one additional eastbound left -turn lane to provide triple left -turn lanes. Provide one additional southbound left -turn lane to provide triple left -turn lanes. The following mitigation measure is related specifically to intersections that have been identified to operate at LOS E along Calle Tampico: CIR-10 For road segments along Calle Tampico between Avenida Bermudas and Washington Street, the City shall conduct periodic monitoring of actual conditions in the Village(timing to be determined as development begins to occur in the project area), and will review its Parking Demand Management strategies (directly correlated with traffic volumes) to determine additional strategies that can be employed related to remote parking and shuttle services, additional pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and educational programs. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-15 August 2016 1063 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-2 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on the environment Mitigation Measures Level of Significance after Mitigation 5.15 Utilities and Infrastructure Increased demand on UTL-1 All new development within the Village Build -out Plan shall be connected to Less than significant public utilities sanitary sewer service. UTL-2 The City shall ensure coordination with CVWD and to assure that existing and future extended sanitary sewer facilities are adequate. UTL-3 The City shall create a tracking log for development projects in the project area that identifies the existing water and sewer lines in the project area, then on a project by project basis, inputs the type and size of proposed uses, the potable water required and wastewater generated. The City will work with CVWD to determine when upgrades to infrastructure will be required. UTL-4 All project development within the Village Build -out Plan shall coordinate with CVWD to show compliance with water reduction requirements. UTL-5 All new development within the Village Build -out Plan shall demonstrate a reduction of domestic water consumption equivalent to the CalGreen Tier One standards in effect at the time of development. UTL-6 The City shall continue to implement its Water Efficient Landscape ordinance by requiring that development projects within the Village Build - out Plan implement water efficient landscaping plans to meet or exceed current water efficiency standards. UTL-7 In conjunction with CVWD as well as independently, the City shall develop programs to allow and encourage the retrofitting of existing water intensive appliances and irrigation systems for existing development within the Village Build -out Plan. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-16 August 2016 1064 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-2 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (continued) Potential Impacts on the environment Mitigation Measures Level of Significance after Mitigation 5.15 Utilities and Service Systems (continued) UTL-8 All new developments shall use water conserving appliances and fixtures, as well as the application of water -conserving technologies in conformance with Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code, Title 20, California Administrative Code Section 1601(b), and applicable sections of Title 24 of the State Code. UTL-9 All new and existing commercial establishments shall be required to comply with State mandates (AB 341) to reduce the amount of packaging and potential waste associated with product manufacturing and sales. UTL- 10 The City shall continue to refer project developers to Burrtec for development of construction and demolition solid waste recycling plans in order to divert a minimum of 50% of C&D debris from the waste stream. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-17 August 2016 1065 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT 7.4.2 Alternatives Considered for Evaluation Two alternatives to the proposed Village Build -out Plan were considered for evaluation compared to the proposed project. 7.4.2.1 Alternative 1: Build -out Under the Existing Zoning Ordinance and La Quinta Village Design Guidelines Under this alternative development in the Village Build -out Plan project area is the No -Project Alternative where the proposed Zoning Code amendments would not be adopted to allow for increased height and residential density that would create a more compact pedestrian friendly neighborhood, with residential, commercial and professional office space. In addition, under this alternative, projects would continue to be subject to the Village Design Guidelines which include a maximum building height of 45 feet. Table 7-3, Comparison Between Development Under Existing Zoning Code/Village Design Guidelines and the Village Build -out Plan, shows the difference between the proposed project and this alternative. Table 7-3 Comparison Between Development Under Existing Zoning Code/Village Design Guidelines and the Village Build -out Plan Alternative 1 Village Build -out Plan' Existing Zoning Code/Village Design Guidelines) Village Commercial District Building heights shall not exceed two stories Building heights shall not exceed 60 feet (no building height identified) (number of stories not identified) The intensity of the commercial projects and Residential density of up to 25 du/ac south of Calle residential density shall be determined on a site Tampico and 30 du/ac north of Calle Tampico; specific basis, under the Village Use Permit process; intensity of commercial component continues to be but for the purposes of the alternatives analysis an determined on a site specific basis but for purposes FAR of .35 and a residential density of 16 du/ac was of the environmental evaluation a FAR of .5 was assumed. assumed Design Guideline Representations shown in the Various architectural styles will be encouraged appendix are examples of a Mediterranean and subject to review by the Architecture and Spanish styles of architecture Landscaping Review Board and Planning Commission Neighborhood Commercial District (northwest corner of Calle Tampico and Washington Street) Site not affected by Zoning Code Amendment or rescinding of the Village Design Guidelines Notes: 1. City of La Quinta Zoning Ordinance Chapter 9.65, Village Design Guidelines. 2. City of La Quinta Village Build -out Plan, Final Summary Table. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-18 August 2016 1066 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Existing zoning designations in the project area are as follows: Village Commercial The Village Commercial Designation applies specifically to the traditional Commercial core of the City, and allows specialty retail; such as boutiques and art galleries as well as restaurants, professional offices and services, and hotels. Apartments, condominiums and live -work space is also appropriate in this designation. As established in General Plan 2035 Policy LU-7.1, mixed use development is allowed in this designation. Mixed use projects can include vertical or horizontal combinations of land uses that are integrated through pedestrian connections and common areas; or can include residential units added to existing commercial development. General Commercial This land use designation applies to the majority of commercial land in the City. The full range of commercial uses can occur within this designation, ranging from supermarkets and drugstores in a neighborhood shopping center, to major national retailers in large buildings. General Commercial uses also include professional offices, service businesses, restaurants, hotels or motels, research and development and warehousing or similar low impact quasi -industrial projects. As established in General Plan 2035 Policy LU-7.1, mixed use development is also appropriate in this designation. Major Community Facilities The Major Community Facilities Land Use designation has been assigned to existing or planned municipal, educational or public facilities; such as City and Desert Sands Unified School District facilities and buildings, utility facilities and buildings, fire stations, and public parking lots and similar uses. Recreational Open Space The Recreational Open Space designation applies to parks, recreation facilities (such as driving ranges, club houses and athletic facilities), and public and private golf courses. Alternative Analysis Under this alternative, 16 dwelling units per acre was assumed (Residential High Designation), 590,935 square feet of the Village Build -out Plan's non-residential uses, and a maximum of two -stories on new buildings (not including underground parking). These assumptions are based on the more traditional commercial district where each project is responsible for meeting its particular parking requirements on - site, and the Village Design Guidelines. The number of dwelling units was determined by using the Residential High Density (RH) designation (12-16 du/ac) per Zoning Code Chapter 9.50.020. Table 7-4, Comparison of Village Build -out Plan and Alternative 1 for Intensity and Density of Land Uses, shows how Alternative 1 compares to the Village Build -out Plan. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-19 August 2016 1067 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-4 Comparison of Village Build -out Plan and Alternative 1 for Intensity and Density of Land Uses Village Build -out Plan Alternative 1 Difference Building Height 60 feet Buildings not to exceed 2 stories or 45 feet +15 feet Dwelling Units/ acre 20 - 30 16 (RH District maximum) 4-14 more units per acre Dwelling Units 1,230 785 -445 Non -Res Scl Ft 799,786 590,935 -208,851 Population 3,198 2,041 -1,157 Summary of Comparison Between the Village Build -out Plan and Alternative 1 Less Than Significant and Similar Impacts to the Village Build -out Plan As shown in Table 7-5, there are a number of impacts associated with the proposed Village Build -out Plan that are similar to those identified for Alternative 1, Build -out Under Existing Zoning and the La Quinta Village Design Guidelines, and these can be mitigated to less than significant levels through measures identified in Table 7-2 for both the project and Alternative 1. These include the following: • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Geology and Soils • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Hydrology and Water Quality • Land Use • Noise • Public Services • Recreation • Traffic and Circulation Table 7-5, Comparison of Village Build -out Plan and Alternative 1 for Environmental Effects, shows the difference between the Village Build -out Plan and Alternative 1. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-20 August 2016 1068 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-5 Comparison of Village Build -out Plan and Alternative 1 for Environmental Effects Village Build -out Plan Alternative 1 Difference Aesthetics Building heights of 60 feet Building heights not to exceed two Lower building heights stories or 45 feet Air Quality Thresholds Significant and Unavoidable for Significant and Unavoidable for Significant and Unavoidable for (lb/day) VOC (123.75 lb/day) VOC (80.73 lb/day) VOC VOC 75 NOx 100 NOx (102.9 lb/day) CO 550 SOx 150 CO (754.42 lb/day) PM10 150 PM2.5 55 Biological Resources Less than significant with mitigation - Less than significant with mitigation Similar as vacant and see Table 7-2 for list of measures — see Table 7-2 for list of measures underutilized properties would be developed Cultural Resources Less than significant with mitigation — Less than significant with mitigation Similar as vacant and see Table 7-2 for list of measures — see Table 7-2 for list of measures underutilized properties would be developed Geology and Soils Less than significant with mitigation — Less than significant with mitigation Similar as vacant and see Table 7-2 for list of measures — see Table 7-2 for list of measures underutilized properties would be developed Greenhouse Gasses Significant and Unavoidable Total Significant and Unavoidable Total Impact remains Significant and Metric tons per year Emissions and Emissions per service Emissions and Emissions per service Unavoidable but total emissions MTCO2e 3,000 population population and emissions per SP would be Per Service 37,922.64 MTCO2e/yr and 7.4 24,649.7 MTCO2e/yr and 4.81 less Population 3.0 MTCO2e/SP/yr MTCC2e/SP/yr Hazards and Hazardous Less than significant with mitigation — Less than significant with mitigation Similar as vacant and Materials see Table 7-2 for list of measures — see Table 7-2 for list of measures underutilized properties would be developed Hydrology and Water Less than significant with mitigation — Less than significant with mitigation Similar as vacant and Quality see Table 7-2 for list of measures — see Table 7-2 for list of measures underutilized properties would be developed La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-21 August 2016 1069 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-5 Comparison of Village Build -out Plan and Alternative 1 for Environmental Effects (continued) Village Build -out Plan Alternative 1 Difference Land Use Less than significant with Less than significant with Similar as vacant and implementation of Parking Demand implementation of Parking Demand underutilized properties would Strategies Strategies be developed Noise Less than significant with mitigation — Less than significant with mitigation Similar as vacant and see Table 7-2 for list of measures — see Table 7-2 for list of measures underutilized properties would be developed Population and Housing 3,198 Residents 2,040 Residents -1,158 No adverse impacts identified No adverse impacts identified No adverse impacts identified but would not meet the City's goal to continue the development of the Village by encouraging additional residential development Public Services Less than significant with mitigation — Less than significant with mitigation Similar but 25% fewer residents see Table 7-2 for list of measures — see Table 7-2 for list of measures and fewer non-res land uses may translate into less impact on public services Recreation Less than significant impact as the City Less than significant impact as the Similar as vacant and will monitor new development to City will monitor new development underutilized properties would ensure that public facilities and to ensure that public facilities and be developed infrastructure are adequate to support infrastructure are adequate to the increase in intensity of land uses in support the increase in intensity of the Village land uses in the Village Traffic and Circulation Less than significant with mitigation — Less than significant with mitigation Similar as vacant and see Table 7-2 for list of measures — see Table 7-2 for list of measures underutilized properties would be developed La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-22 August 2016 1070 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-5 Comparison of Village Build -out Plan and Alternative 1 for Environmental Effects (continued) Village Build -out Plan Alternative 1 Difference Utilities and Service Systems Water Use — Residential' 175,890 gpd 131,918 gpd Less water used Water Use — Non-res' 76,780 gpd 57,585 gpd -63,104 gpd Total 252,670 gpd 189,566 gpd Wastewater Generation Less wastewater generated 189,502 gpd 161,131 gpd -28,371 gpd Solid Waste — Res3 15,030 lb/day 11,273 lb/day Solid Waste — Non-res4 4,800 lb/day 3,600 lb/day -4,957 lb/day Total 19,830 lb/day 14,873 lb/day Source: Coachella Valley Water District Urban Water Management Plan, 2010, and CalRecycle (www.caIrecycle. ca.gov). 1. Water use: 1) Residential — 55gpd/person @2.6 persons per household = 143 gpd/du. 2) Non-residential — 0.096 gpd/sqft of new commercial/professional. 2. Wastewater Generation: Urban area = 0.85 percent of water usage. 3. Solid Waste: Residential — 4.7 lb/day/person x 2.6 persons per household = 12.22 lb/day. 4. Solid Waste: Non-residential — Specialty Commercial per the TIA consisting of a variety of retail, restaurant and office uses - .006 Ib/sgft/day. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-23 August 2016 1071 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Less Impact than the Village Build -out Plan Table 7-5 also shows where impacts associated with Alternative 1 would be less than impacts associated with the proposed project. These are Aesthetics and Population and Housing. Aesthetics — under the proposed project, building heights could increase to 60 feet. On properties north of Calle Tampico, the Village Build -out Plan calls for 615 dwelling units and 346,465 square feet of non- residential uses. The area north of Calle Tampico that is either vacant land or has the potential to be redeveloped is a total of 20.43 acres; 9.31 acres represent the shopping center located at the northwest corner of Calle Tampico and Washington Street. The assumption in the Plan is for ground floor commercial with residential above. Development under the Plan could have a significant effect on Aesthetics by restricting or blocking views from existing public spaces and along the Calle Tampico Image Corridor. Under existing conditions, the properties north of Calle Tampico that are subject to the Village Build -out Plan are all currently developed with existing uses, except for 2.4 acres at the northwest corner of Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive. Using the assumptions in the Village Build -out Plan for this site north of Calle Tampico, up to 52,272 square feet of non-residential (.5 FAR) and 72 dwelling units could be built above. Under this alternative, buildings would not exceed 45 feet in height. Therefore, development under Alternative 1 would have a less than significant impact on Aesthetics regarding views from public spaces. However, this Alternative would not meet the City's goals to continue the development of the Village as a mixed use neighborhood by encouraging additional residential and commercial development, as it assumes status quo in that only vacant properties would be subject to development proposals. Population and Housing — Under the proposed project, the number of dwelling units varies between 20 and 30 units to the acre allowing for a maximum of 1,230 new dwelling units. Using a ratio of 2.6 residents per dwelling unit, the projected population at build -out would be 3,198 new residents. Under Alternative 1, the number of dwelling units is a maximum of 16 dwelling units to the acre as allowed under the Residential High zoning designation. This would result in 445 fewer new dwelling units and 1,158 fewer residents living in the Village. The City's goal in proposing an increase in density is to create a synergy between residents living in the Village and the non-residential uses that would be developed in the Village. The project area is approximately 137 acres and under the proposed project residents would be able to walk, bike or use a golf cart to get around. Alternative 1 would not meet this goal to the same extent as the proposed project. Significant and Unavoidable Impact Table 7-2 identified two impacts associated with the proposed Village Build -out Plan that cannot be reduced to less than significant levels through mitigation. These are Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases. Both impacts would remain significant and unavoidable for Alternative 1. Air Quality — Under the Village Build -out Plan, air emissions during long-term operation would be significant for VOC - 123.75 lb/day (75), NOx- 102.9 lb/day (100) and CO - 754.42 lb/day (550). SCAQMD La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-24 August 2016 1072 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT thresholds are shown in parentheses. Under Alternative 1, air emissions would all be below the SCAQMD thresholds except for VOC - 80.73 lb/day (75). Therefore, although air emissions would be greatly reduced under this alternative, one SCAQMD threshold would still be exceeded, and the impact would remain significant and unavoidable. Greenhouse Gasses — Under the Village Build -out Plan, greenhouse gas emissions during long term operation would be significant for the generation of gross metric tons of CO2 per year (MTCO2e) of 37,9222.64 (3,000 MTY) as well as 7.4 MTCO2e per Service Population (3.0). SCAQMD thresholds are shown in parentheses. Under Alternative 1, greenhouse gas emissions would be above the SCAQMD thresholds at 24,649.70 MTCO2e and 4.81 MTCO2e per Service Population. Therefore, although greenhouse gas emissions would be greatly reduced under this alternative, the impact would remain significant and unavoidable. This alternative represents build -out of the Village under the General Plan, applicable Zoning Districts and Village Design Guidelines. Therefore, the impacts to Air Quality and Greenhouse Gasses associated with this alternative were evaluated in the General Plan 2035 Program EIR and were found to be significant and unavoidable. The City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations including Statement 2 - Impacts identified as significant are generally associated with normal growth and progress and would be much more severe without implementation of the proposed General Plan update. A similar Statement of Overriding Considerations will be adopted for the Village Build -out Plan if this alternative is chosen. Summary A reduction of 445 new dwelling units and 208,851 square feet of non-residential uses would result in fewer vehicle trips, with a resulting reduction in air emissions as shown in Table 7-5. Impacts associated with vehicle trips can be reduced to less than significant levels through the development of traffic calming techniques such as round-abouts at key intersections and adding bicycle/golf cart lanes to provide options for residents and visitors to get out of their cars. Alternative 1 would result in a significant reduction in air emissions and greenhouse gas emissions, however, build -out under this alternative would still result in emissions of VOCs in exceedance of the SCAQMD threshold during long term operation (Air), and emissions of CO2 (GHG). The City's goal is to continue to develop the Village as a livable and sustainable neighborhood - reminiscent of older cities - where land uses are more interconnected, compact, and offer a mix of uses, providing opportunities for people to live, work, and shop within the neighborhood. In order to achieve this goal, a number of objectives have been identified based on the concept of mixed -use. This alternative would meet this goal, but not to the extent that the Village Build -out Plan would, as this alternative would only accommodate 2/3 of the population envisioned in the Plan and % of the new non- residential uses. Build -out at the density and intensity provided in the Village Build -out Plan would create livable and sustainable neighborhood because at build -out, including both existing residents and new La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-25 August 2016 1073 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT residents, there is the potential for the population in the Village to reach 3,936 residents. When adding tourists and residents in other parts of the City who would be drawn in, the Village would become a vibrant walkable neighborhood. Under Alternative 1, the total number of residents would be 2,040, and when adding existing residents, the total population of the Village would be 2,778, or 1,158 fewer residents. 7.4.2.2 Alternative 2: Reduced Village Build -out Plan Project Area Under this alternative, development in the Village Build -out Plan project area would only occur on vacant properties. Properties that the City has identified as having the potential to be redeveloped under the Village Build -out Plan would remain developed with existing uses. Under this alternative, the intensity and density of new uses on vacant properties would be similar to those allowed under the Village Build - out Plan. • Building Height — 60 feet • Dwelling units at up to 30 units to the acre • No Village Design Guidelines — architectural style considered on a project by project basis Alternative Analysis Under this alternative only vacant properties would be developed, but development standards set forth in the Village Build -out Plan for height and density would be used. This alternative represents approximately 35 percent of the development potential of the Village Build -out Plan. For the 20.67 acres of vacant land in the Village, 436 dwelling units and 297,330 square feet of non-residential uses could be developed, representing a reduction from the Village Build -out Plan of 502,459 square feet of non- residential uses and 794 fewer dwelling units. Table 7-6, Comparison of Village Build -out Plan and Alternative 2 for Intensity and Density of Land Uses, shows how Alternative 2 compares to the Village Build -out Plan. Table 7-7, Comparison of Village Build -out Plan and Alternative 2 for Environmental Affects, shows the difference between the Village Build -out Plan and Alternative 2. Table 7-6 Comparison of Village Build -out Plan and Alternative 2 for Intensity and Density of Land Uses Village Build -out Plan Alternative 2 Difference Building Height 60 feet north of Calle Tampico No Change +15 feet Dwelling Units/ acre 20 - 30 No Change -- Dwelling Units 1,230 436 -794 Non -Res Sq Ft 799,786 297,330 -502,459 Population 3,198 1,134 -2,064 La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-26 August 2016 1074 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Summary of Comparison Between the Village Build -out Plan and Alternative 1 Less Than Significant and Similar Impacts to the Village Build -out Plan As shown in Table 7-7, Comparison of Village Build -out Plan and Alternative 2 for Environmental Effects, there are a number of impacts associated with the proposed Village Build -out Plan that are similar to those identified for Alternative 2, Reduced Village Build -out Plan ProjectArea, and these can be mitigated to less than significant levels through measures identified in Table 7-2. These include the following: • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Geology and Soils • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Hydrology and Water Quality Less Impact than the Village Build -out Plan Table 7-7 also shows where impacts associated with Alternative 2 would be less than impacts associated with the proposed project. These are Aesthetics, Air Quality, Noise, Public Services, Population and Housing, Recreation, Traffic and Circulation, and Utilities and Infrastructure. Aesthetics. Because only vacant properties would be developed, and building heights would be in compliance with the Zoning Code (maximum 45 feet), the building density would be similar to existing conditions in the "Old Town" area of the Village (see photos 4 and 5 of Exhibit 4-4 in Chapter 4, Project Description). Photo 4 shows one of the vacant parcels in the Village. Views from public spaces such as sidewalks and public streets would be similar to the view shown in Photo 5 when sites are developed. Air Quality. Under Alternative 2, emissions of criteria pollutants would all be below the SCAQMD thresholds during long-term operation. Noise. Reduced square footage of non-residential uses and number of dwelling units would reduce the number of vehicles entering and driving through the Village, thus reducing impacts associated with traffic noise. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-27 August 2016 1075 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-7 Comparison of Village Build -out Plan and Alternative 2 for Environmental Effects Village Build -out Plan Alternative 2 Difference Aesthetics Building heights of 60 feet Building heights similar, but only vacant Less than significant as fewer properties would be developed, buildings would be developed reducing the potential for taller buildings north of Calle Tampico to block views of scenic resources from public spaces Air Quality Thresholds Significant and Unavoidable for All air emissions are below the Less Than Significant with air (lb/day) VOC (123.75 lb/day) SCAQMD thresholds emissions all under SCAQMD VOC 75 NOx 100 NOx (102.9 lb/day) Thresholds CO 550 SOx 150 CO (754.42 lb/day) PM10 150 PM2.5 55 Biological Resources Less than significant with Less than significant with mitigation — Similar as any new development mitigation - see Table 7-2 for list see Table 7-2 for list of measures would require compliance with of measures survey requirements Cultural Resources Less than significant with Less than significant with mitigation — Similar as adjacency to existing mitigation — see Table 7-2 for list see Table 7-2 for list of measures historic buildings must be evaluated of measures on a project by project basis Geology and Soils Less than significant with Less than significant with mitigation — Similar as all new development mitigation — see Table 7-2 for list see Table 7-2 for list of measures projects will be required to comply of measures with CBC building standards Greenhouse Gasses Significant and Unavoidable Total Significant and Unavoidable Total Significant and Unavoidable, Metric tons per year Emissions and Emissions per Emissions and Emissions per service although the CO2 emissions per MTCO2e 3,000 service population population Service Population would drop Per Service 37,922.64 MTCO2e/yr and 7.4 13,273 MTCO2e/yr and 2.59 below the threshold of 3 (2.90) and Population 3.0 MTCO2e/SP/yr MTCO2e/SP/yr the amount of CO2 generated would be reduced by 65 percent, the emissions are still above the 3,000 MTCO2e threshold. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-28 August 2016 1076 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-5 Comparison of Village Build -out Plan and Alternative 1 for Environmental Effects (continued) Village Build -out Plan Alternative 1 Difference Hazards and Less than significant with Less than significant with mitigation — Similar, although new non - Hazardous Materials mitigation — see Table 7-2 for list see Table 7-2 for list of measures residential uses could use hazardous of measures materials or generate hazardous waste, they would still be regulated an require permitting Hydrology and Water Less than significant with Less than significant with mitigation — Similar, as development in the Quality mitigation — see Table 7-2 for list see Table 7-2 for list of measures Village will increase the amount of of measures non -pervious surfaces Land Use Less than significant with Less than significant with Similar, as the City would still pursue implementation of Parking implementation of Parking Demand elements of the Build -out Plan Demand Strategies Strategies including Parking Demand Strategies and Traffic Calming Techniques (see Section 7.14) Noise Less than significant with Less than significant with mitigation — Less impact due to fewer vehicles in mitigation — see Table 7-2 for list see Table 7-2 for list of measures the Village, and fewer non - of measures residential uses such as restaurants where night-time noise can be generated Population and 3,198 Residents 1,134 Residents -2,064 Housing No adverse impacts identified No adverse impacts identified No adverse impacts identified but would not meet the City's goal to continue the development of the Village by encouraging additional residential development La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-29 August 2016 1077 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-5 Comparison of Village Build -out Plan and Alternative 1 for Environmental Effects (continued) Village Build -out Plan Alternative 1 Difference Public Services Less than significant with Less than significant with mitigation — Less impact to public services due to mitigation — see Table 7-2 for list see Table 7-2 for list of measures 65% decrease in residents and non - of measures residential uses Recreation Less than significant impact as the Less than significant impact as the City Less impact to public services due to City will monitor new development will monitor new development to 65% decrease in residents and non - to ensure that public facilities and ensure that public facilities and residential uses infrastructure are adequate to infrastructure are adequate to support support the increase in intensity of the increase in intensity of land uses in land uses in the Village the Village Traffic and Circulation Less than significant with Less than significant with mitigation — Less impact to public services due to mitigation — see Table 7-2 for list see Table 7-2 for list of measures 65% decrease in residents and non - of measures residential uses Utilities and Service Systems Water Use i Residential 175,890 gpd 61,562 gpd Less water used Water Use — Non-resl 76,780 gpd 26,873 gpd -164,235 gpd Total 252,670 gpd 88,435 gpd Wastewater 189502 d gpd 75170 d gp Less wastewater generated Generation , , -114,332 gpd Solid Waste — Res3 15,030 lb/day 5,261 lb/day Solid Waste — Non-res4 4,800 lb/day 1,680 lb/day -12,889 lb/day Total 19,830 lb/day 6,941 lb/day Source: Coachella Valley Water District Urban Water Management Plan, 2010, and CalRecycle (www.caIrecycle. ca.gov). 5. Water use: 1) Residential — 55gpd/person @2.6 persons per household = 143 gpd/du. 2) Non-residential — 0.096 gpd/sgft of new commercial/professional. 6. Wastewater Generation: Urban area = 0.85% of water usage. 7. Solid Waste: Residential — 4.7 lb/day/person x 2.6 persons per household = 12.22 lb/day. 8. Solid Waste: Non-residential — Specialty Commercial per the TIA consisting of a variety of retail, restaurant and office uses - .006 Ib/sgft/day. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-30 August 2016 1078 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Public Services. Reduced square footage of non-residential uses and number of dwelling units would reduce impacts on public schools police and fire calls, and library use. Population and Housing. A reduction of 794 dwelling units would have a less than significant impact on the amount of housing available in the City, however this reduction and related reduction of 2,064 new residents in the Village would not meet the City's goal to continue the development of the Village to create a vibrant and sustainable neighborhood by encouraging additional residential development. Recreation. Reduced number of dwelling units and related number of residents would reduce the number of residents seeking recreational activities in the Village such as use of the community park, museum, and senior center. Traffic and Circulation. Reduced square footage of non-residential uses and number of dwelling units would reduce the number of vehicles entering and driving through the Village. Similar to the proposed project, road improvements, including roundabouts and bike lanes would be completed under this alternative. Utilities and Infrastructure. Reduced square footage of non-residential uses and number of dwelling units would reduce the amount of water used, and the amount of wastewater and solid waste generated. Similar to the proposed project, utilities and other infrastructure would be upgraded as the Village is built out and the City will track this on a project by project basis, and in coordination with utility providers, so no significant impacts would occur for either the proposed project or this alternative. Significant and Unavoidable Impact Table 7-7 identified one impact associated with Alternative 2, Greenhouse Gas. Under the proposed Village Build -out Plan there were two impacts identified that cannot be reduced to less than significant levels through mitigation; Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases. Greenhouse Gasses — Under the Village Build -out Plan, greenhouse gas emissions during long term operation would be significant for the generation of gross metric tons of CO2 per year (MTCO2e) of 37,9222.64 (3,000 MTY) as well as 7.4 MTCO2e per Service Population (3.0). SCAQMD thresholds are shown in parentheses. Under Alternative 2, greenhouse gas emissions would remain above the SCAQMD threshold at 13,273 MTCO2e, but could be reduced to 2.9 MTCO2e per Service Population. Therefore, although greenhouse gas emissions would be greatly reduced under this alternative, the impact would remain significant and unavoidable. Summary A reduction of 784 new dwelling units and 502,459 square feet of non-residential uses represents a 65% reduction from the Village Build -out Plan. This alternative would result in fewer vehicle trips, with a resulting reduction in air emissions to below the SCAQMD thresholds as shown in Table 7-7. Impacts associated with vehicle trips can be reduced to less than significant levels through the development of traffic calming techniques such as round-abouts at key intersections and adding bicycle/golf cart lanes La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-31 August 2016 1079 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT to provide options for residents and visitors to get out of their cars. Alternative 2 would result in a significant reduction in air emissions and greenhouse gas emissions, however, build -out under this alternative would still result in emissions CO2 above the threshold (333 MTCO2e). All other impacts associated with the Village Build -out Plan can be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of mitigation measures. This is also true for Alternative 2, except that with a 65 percent reduction in dwelling units and non-residential uses, water use, wastewater and solid waste generation, and impacts to public services would be less than under the Village Build -out Plan. The City's goal is to continue to develop the Village as a livable and sustainable neighborhood - reminiscent of older cities - where land uses are more interconnected, compact, and offer a mix of uses, providing opportunities for people to live, work, and shop within the neighborhood. In order to achieve this goal, a number of objectives have been identified based on the concept of mixed -use. This alternative would meet this goal, but not to the extent that the Village Build -out Plan would, as this alternative would only accommodate 35 percent of the population and new land uses envisioned in the Plan. 7.5 Alternative Impact Evaluation Table 7-8 Comparison of Village Build -out Plan and Alternatives Project Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Dwelling units Existing 284 284 284 Proposed 1,198 785 434 Total 1,482 1,069 718 Non-residential uses Existing 160,925 160,925 160,925 Proposed 799,786 590,935 297,330 Total 960,925 751,860 458,255 7.6 Environmentally Superior Alternative The primary reasons for conducting an Alternatives Analysis in an EIR are to describe a range of reasonable alternatives which would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project and foster informed decision making and public participation. The State CEQA Guidelines, as amended, also requires that the EIR identify which of the Alternatives would be "environmentally superior." La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-32 August 2016 1080 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Table 7-9 Impact Matrix — Alternatives Relative to the Proposed Project Environmental Impacts of the Superior Alternative Alternative 1 Alternative 2 by Potentially Topic Proposed Project Significant Effect Aesthetics Less than significant Less than Less than Alternative 2 significant significant Air Quality Significant and Significant and Less than Alternative 2 Unavoidable Unavoidable significant Biological Less than significant Less than Less than Alternative 2 Resources with mitigation significant with significant with mitigation mitigation Cultural and Less than significant Less than Less than Alternative 2 Paleontological with mitigation significant with significant with Resources mitigation mitigation Geology and Less than significant Less than Less than Alternative 2 Soils with mitigation significant with significant with mitigation mitigation Greenhouse Gas Significant and Significant and Significant and Alternative 2 Emissions Unavoidable Unavoidable Unavoidable Hazards and Less than significant Less than Less than Alternative 2 Hazardous with mitigation significant with significant with Materials mitigation mitigation Hydrology and Less than significant Less than Less than Alternative 2 Water Quality with mitigation significant with significant with mitigation mitigation Land Use and Less than significant Less than Less than Alternative 2 Planning with mitigation significant with significant with mitigation mitigation Noise Less than significant Less than Less than Alternative 2 with mitigation significant with significant with mitigation mitigation Population and Less than significant Less than Less than Alternative 2 Housing with mitigation significant with significant with mitigation mitigation Public Services Less than significant Less than Less than Alternative 2 with mitigation significant with significant with mitigation mitigation Recreation Less than significant Less than Less than Alternative2 with mitigation significant with significant with mitigation mitigation Transportation / Less than significant Less than Less than Alternative 2 Circulation with mitigation significant with significant with mitigation mitigation Utilities & Less than significant Less than Less than Alternative 2 Service Systems with mitigation significant with significant with mitigation mitigation La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-33 August 2016 1081 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT Environmentally superior generally means "has the least potentially significant overall environmental impact on the environment". Section 15126.6(e)(2) of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended, also states: "If the environmentally superior alternative is the 'no project' alternative, the EIR shall also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives." Section 7.4 presented a summary of the potentially significant impacts of the proposed project and those of each of the two Alternatives considered and evaluated in this EIR. The foregoing was provided in a tabular format to facilitate a comparison of the potentially significant effects of each alternative in comparison to those associated with the proposed project on a topic by topic basis. The data were presented in previous Table 7-2, Impact Matrix — Relative to the Proposed Project. Once completed, the aforementioned comparative impact analysis then served as the basis for determining which Alternative was "environmentally superior" to the others. The procedure by which to arrive at this determination was relatively straightforward. Using the significant environmental effects of the proposed project as the basis for comparison, the potential significance of each impact of each alternative in relation to those of the proposed project was identified and classified as being either similar or just as significant, or less than significant than that of the proposed project on an environmental topic by topic basis. The results are presented in Table 7-9. 7.6.1 Environmentally Superior Alternative The environmentally superior alternative is Alternative 2, Reduced Village Build -out Plan Project Area, where only vacant properties would be developed, representing a 65 percent reduction in the number of dwelling units and square footage of non-residential uses. The Village is the City's traditional commercial core and has remained a focus of the City's economic development strategy since incorporation. Over the years, the City has completed several planning efforts, with varying levels of success. The 2035 General Plan, adopted in 2013, included the Village as a focus area, and added provisions to encourage mixed use development in this area. At this time, development interest in the Village is increasing, and the City wishes to have all the tools it needs in place to encourage and promote development, including the ability for applicants to develop multi -story buildings in order to meet the City's goal for increased density in the Village. The focus of the Village Build -out Plan is on Village Commercial designated properties both vacant and underutilized properties; and to a lesser extent, the Neighborhood Commercial site at the northwest corner of Calle Tampico and Washington Street. The City's goal is to continue to develop the Village as a livable and sustainable neighborhood - reminiscent of older cities - where land uses are more interconnected, compact, and offer a mix of La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-34 August 2016 1082 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT uses, providing opportunities for people to live, work, and shop within the neighborhood. In order to achieve this goal, a number of objectives have been identified based on the concept of mixed -use. The City's objectives in proposing the Village Build -out Plan are as follows: • Continue the development of the Village as a mixed use neighborhood by encouraging additional residential and commercial development. • Amend the Zoning Code Text forthe Village Commercial District, in the area south of Calle Tampico to allow an increase in building height (subject to site plan review on a project by project basis) to allow an increase in density of residential uses. • Ensure that public facilities and infrastructure are adequate to support the increase in intensity of land uses in the Village. • Capitalize on unique development opportunities in the Village area by focusing on shopping, dining, entertainment, professional and mixed use options while improving the aesthetics of the community. Alternative 2 would meet these objective, but not to the extent that the Village Build -out Plan would because of the economy of scale required to upgrade the public facilities and infrastructure in the Village, including the proposed traffic calming elements such as replacing traditional four way stops with round- abouts, adding additional pedestrian amenities such as wider sidewalks and enhanced crosswalks (i.e. pedestrian activated crosswalk lights), upgrading the drainage system and upgrading the water and sewer lines to accommodate new growth. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-35 August 2016 1083 ATTACH M ENT 1 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT This page intentionally left blank. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 7-36 August 2016 1084 ATTACH M ENT 1 8 EIR PREPARATION Chapter 8 EIR Preparation 8.1 Lead Agency City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Gabriel Perez, Development Services Planning Manager Bryan McKinney, P.E., Development Services Principal Engineer Nicole Criste, Contract Planner Nazir Lalani, P.E., Contract Traffic Engineer 8.2 EIR Preparation Team EIR Preparation The Altum Group 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite, 219 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Nancy Ferguson, Environmental Planning Manager Cheri Flores, Project Planner Jon Braginton, Project Planner Audrey Nickerson, Planner Douglas Kinley, Planner Michelle Vecsernyes, Project Coordinator Erika Sinihuiz, Project Coordinator Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Kunzman and Associates, Inc. 1111 Town and Country Rd #34 Orange, CA 92868 Carl Ballard, LEED GA, Principal Katie Wilson, M.S., Senior Associate Catherine Howe, M.S., Associate La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 8-1 August 2016 1085 ATTACH M ENT 1 8 EIR PREPARATION Cultural Resources Applied Earthworks 133 N. San Gabriel Blvd. Suite 201 Pasadena, CA 91107-3414 (626) 578-0119 Colleen Hamilton, Architectural Historian Hydrology Study The Altum Group 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite, 219 Palm Desert, CA 92260 James Bazua, P.E., Engineering Division Chief Traffic Impact Analysis Kunzman and Associates, Inc. 1111 Town and Country Rd #34 Orange, CA 92868 Giancarlo Ganddini, T.E., Senior Traffic Engineer Carl Ballard, LEED GA, Principal La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 8-2 August 2016 ON ATTACH M ENT 1 9 REFERENCES Chapter 9 References Chapter 5 Environmental Impact Analysis Section 5.1 Aesthetics City of La Quinta, La Quinta General Plan 2035, Land Use Element, 2013. Terra Nova Planning and Research, Inc., City of La Quinta General Plan 2035 Program EIR, City of La Quinta, July 2012. Village at La Quinta Design Guidelines, 1998. Site visits to identify and document existing conditions and take photographs. Section 5.2 Air Quality Kunzman and Associates Inc., La Quinta Build -Out Plan Air Quality and Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, March 2016. Kunzman and Associates Inc., La Quinta Build -Out Plan Traffic Impact Analysis, March 2016. Section 5.3 Biological Resources AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc., City of La Quinta General Plan Update: Biological Resources, June 2010. City of La Quinta, General Plan 2035, Chapter 111, Natural Resources, Biological Resources, 2013. Terra Nova Planning and Research, Inc., City of La Quinta General Plan 2035 Program EIR, City of La Quinta, July 2012. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation, March 2012. Section 5.4 Cultural Resources CRM TECH, Summary of Findings: Citywide Historical Resources Survey Update, City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California, 2006 City of La Quinta, Summary of Findings: Citywide Historical Resources Survey Update, 1996-1997 and 2006, City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California, 2012 Governor's Office of Planning and Research, Discussion Draft Technical Advisory: AB52 and Tribal Cultural Resources in CEQA, May 2015. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 9-1 August 2016 1087 ATTACH M ENT 1 9 REFERENCES Mellon and Associates, City of La Quinta Historic Context Statement. On file, City of La Quinta Planning Department, 1997. Mellon and Associates, City of La Quinta Historic Resources Survey. On file, City of La Quinta Planning Department, 1997. Section 5.5 Geology and Soils City of La Quinta, 2035 General Plan, Environmental Hazards Element, 2013. Terra Nova Planning and Research, Inc., City of La Quinta General Plan 2035 Program EIR, City of La Quinta, July 2012. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Custom Soil Resource Report for La Quinta Village, February 9, 2016. (Appendix C) United States Geological Services, California Water Science Center, Land Subsidence in the Coachella Valley, accessed July 29, 2016, http://www.la-guinta.org/your-government/community- services/senior-services. Section 5.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Kunzman and Associates Inc., La Quinta Build -Out Plan Air Quality and Global Climate Change Impact Analysis, March 2016. Terra Nova Planning and Research, Inc., City of La Quinta Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Reduction Plan, February 2013. Section 5.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Envirostor database, accessed March 28, 2016, http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ City of La Quinta, 2035 General Plan, Environmental Hazards Element, February 19, 2013. Terra Nova Planning and Research, Inc., City of La Quinta General Plan 2035 Program EIR, City of La Quinta, July 2012. EDR, Historical Topographic Map Report, La Quinta Village, October 14, 2015. (Appendix D) Environmental Protection Agency Website, Waste- Hazardous Waste- Waste Types, http://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/wastetypes/index.htm, accessed October 23, 2015. Environmental Protection Agency Website, Summary of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-resource-conservation-and-recovery-act, accessed October 23, 2015. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 9-2 August 2016 1088 ATTACH M ENT 1 9 REFERENCES Section 5.8 Hydrology and Water Quality Michael Baker International (February 2016) City of La Quinta Focused Area Drainage Study Psomas, Downtown Area Drainage Study for City of La Quinta, January 2008. Psomas, City of La Quinta Master Drainage Plan, March 2009. FEMA, Flood Insurance Rate Map (Panel #06065C2241G), August 28, 2008. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (April 1978) Hydrology Manual Section 5.9 Land Use and Planning City of La Quinta, 2035 General Plan, Land Use Element, February 19, 2013. Section 5.10 Noise City of La Quinta, 2035 General Plan, Environmental Hazards Element, 2013. Terra Nova Planning and Research Inc., Lo Quinta General Plan 2035 Program EIR, City of La Quinta, July 2012. City of La Quinta, La Quinta Municipal Code, 1996. Section 5.11 Population and Housing City of La Quinta, 2035 General Plan, Housing Element, 2014. Section 5.12 Public Services City of La Quinta, 2035 General Plan, Public Infrastructure and Services Element, 2013. Desert Sands Unified School District, Fee Justification Study, 2014. http://www.govtech.com/infographics/The-Changing-Face-of-Public-Libraries-Infogra phic.htm1, accessed June 17, 2016. City of La Quinta, Development Impact Fee Study (Final), February 5, 2013. County of Riverside, Riverside County Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Master Plan, January 2, 1986. Riverside County Fire Department Strategic Planning, Terra Nova Personal communication, Jason Newman, December 22, 2010. Management Partners, Inc., Riverside County Fire Department Strategic Plan 2009-2029, November 2009. La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR 9-3 August 2016 1089 ATTACH M ENT 1 9 REFERENCES Coachella Unified School District, Facilities: Demographics, http://www.coachella.kl2.ca.us/interport/default.aspx?tabid=59, accessed November 23, 2010. Section 5.13 Recreation City of La Quinta, 2035 General Plan, Parks, Recreation, and Trails Element, 2013. City of La Quinta, Development Impact Fee Study (Final), February 5, 2013. City of La Quinta Website, Wellness Center, Accessed July 30, 2016, http://www.la-guinta.org/your- govern ment/community-services/sen ior-services. Section 5.14 Traffic and Circulation Kunzman Associates, La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Traffic Impact Analysis, May 2016 Section 5.15 Utilities and Service Systems City of La Quinta, 2035 General Plan, Public Infrastructure and Services Element, 2013. Terra Nova Planning and Research, Inc., La Quinta General Plan 2035 Program EIR, City of La Quinta, 2013. California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, FaclT Conversion Table 1 - Material Type Equivalency Factors, http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/FacIT/Conversionl.pdf, accessed July 12, 2016. Chapter 6 Other CEQA Required Sections Section 6.3 Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes Department of Conservation, Office of Mine Reclamation website accessed June 22, 2016, OMR Data on Mine Operations. Imperial Irrigation District, http://www.iid.com/energy, accessed June 22, 2016. State Mining and Geology Board, 2009, Public Hearing: Consideration of Designation, and Termination of Designation, of Mineral Resources Lands of Statewide or Regional Significance, Palm Springs Production -Consumption Region, Riverside County, California La Quinta Village Build -out Plan EIR August 2016 1090 ATTACHMENT 2 'tlo C,9�'`� �TFZ /kh . Source: City of La Quinta GIS 1 inch = 400 feet The Altum Group f CALLE HIDALGO aw 1 Q N J i Q � 'z � Q I W CALLE.SINALOA Z LU -` co - w - co W SC E ESTAD® CALLErF UIVA z �- CADIZ CALLE CALLEAMIGO DESERT FALL �G WINTER COVE i W w BLUE SKY Q N AVENIDA ULTIMO AVENIDA TUJUNGA co m O � J C J 4,1 04l4 CO U AVENIDA NARANJA CALLE TAMPICO Legend I � _ La Quinta Village Build -out Project Boundary QVE,N_IQA LA FQNQA1.— -- General Plan Q UJ o m, o Designations w Q j z CG General Commercial UJ W J Q Y C0 LDR Low Density Q Q J J 0 Residential U AVENIDA NUESTRA = MC Major Community AVENUE 52" Facilities AVENUE 5 MHDR Medium/High Density Residential OS-R Open Space - Recreation Ong Right -of -Way IL VC Village Commercial General Plan Land Use Designations La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Environmental Impact Report • �. Exhibit 3-5 1092 W 77r3UU A4 3&49 AC ATTACHMENT 3 VVVNTER COVE ,�■ -tea;, �+ ■ --1 - X4 AC 7.D SPsS x er SEAC w c,r• � 1.11 AC bs n[ _-CALLE ES I ALT P 7A.AC 00t i~ ■■�■ O ILU w .,� w w m ,.aoo z 00 w ¢ -4 2 Q O © 2AC w LU CALLE HIDALGC w a,asA,r ll1 ].SEAC u.f 2s,a .so wt w Q z w d 4 a W ■ ■N Lial CALLS $INALOA z } a W ,-V AL I d The Altura Group a ■rSRRI G-TIV,E-1AW(wmons■f 41,SQ6 si CfJ 5.33 AC �rr l % mm .au A 3.34 AC f— rla sG sf . w LU :MAC �#+ 771:71, ]AI A777 411NA J Q z lA,l- W 0 - _j .M no Q LW J Q N4 C7 W �.� J W W J U J {� < Q " IAAC p}po ai .. '■■0 3.9 AC ■■ a■AC *+ a` r+ CD 0 ij i yf .x i .mac ' 01_4 ' 1A C 01', 5 AVENIDA NUESTRA - - AVENUE 52 DEACON 0R 6J CC{CIEGADC Village Build -out Plan Analysis La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Environmental Impact Report Legend Vacant Land Potential Redevelopment Existing Development Not to be changed —" Village Commercial —..� Boundary N Assessor's Parcels 4 w 1elE S Exhibit 3-7 1093 1094 Existing and Potential New Development in the Project Area Existing Potential Existing New Non - Land Use Acres Residential New Non- Residential TOTAL Units (DU)' Residential Residential Square Feet Units (DU) Square Feet Vacant Land 20.70 -- 436 -- 288,330 -- Land with the Potential for 30.20 -- 794 12,400 511,456 -- Redevelopment Existing Developed Properties with no Change in 85.90 -- -- 139,525 -- -- Land Use or Increased Density 1481 251 DU DU, 290 +290 hotel hotel/ Total 136.74 rooms & 17230 151,925 799,786 casita, casitas 960,711 square feet Source: City of La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Land Use Data, August 2015. Notes: 1. Residential unit count includes existing residences 1095 Build -out Assumptions by Area Build -out Assumptions Existing/Future Existing/Future Area Residentia12 Non Res (sq ft)3 Ground floor commercial Existing: 3 du Existing: 22,825 East of and residential above Future: 399 du Future: 302,531 Bermudas 50% res 920du/ac and Total: 402 du Total: 343,356 50% @25 du/ac West of Ground floor commercial Existing: 23 du Existing: 7,200 Navarro and Future: 130 du Future: 21,800 50% @20du/ac and 50% Total: 153 du Total: 29,000 sq ft @25 du/ac Between Ground floor commercial Existing: 6 du Existing: 11,000 Novara and and residential above Future: 59 du Future: 45,410 Bermudas 100% @25du/ac Total: 65 du Total: 56,410 North of Calle Ground floor commercial Existing: 251 du Tampico and residential above plus 290 hotel Existing: 98,500 100% @30 du/ac rooms Future: 346,465 Future: 613 du Total: 444,965 Total: 864 du Misc Lots 1/2 2-story buildings Existing: 1 du Existing: 12,400 acre of less Commercial only, no Future: 0 du Future: 92,580 residential Total: 1 du Total: 104,980 TOTAL Existing:284 du Existing: 151,925 Future: 1,198 du Future: 808,786 Total: 1,482 du Total 960,711 Source: City of La Quinta Village Build -out Plan Land Use Data, August 2015. Notes: 1. Assumes new dwelling units will be developed over commercial uses, in multiple story buildings. 2. Assumes the existing dwelling units will remain in place. 3. Assumes that some existing non-residential buildings will be replaced with new buildings. 1096 ATTACHMENT 4 V `:� {{qq". �.. -�� ':. � � - _� Y'•!, �� '. Legend No 01— it ound®roan t-2 W i� 'E ! M IIIA AI URA l.Ic4" Dvill �: ( +.^�' ?. 1 .. #1 �v*E E > l BM _ S W a r r �1yt„I e Alaw i'./i✓f� BadmPanr++�g `j d ao p' W •"4t I ��jj' Padettrian Cro65in 74m .� R �Ur �Y .�r� Uead End _ °: r iCsfla Amlpol 41 PL 12 i M w It r .. i or IL 4-1 h 1 s q Y � s ,-�' Vie" r ^_� � � -�' � - � �i�► s .re.� s �-..w+.�t /• S� '�{L �- —' .. r � � -r%i nr'"� r ,r Source: Kurtzman Associates, 2016 El 105 The Altum Group Village Build -Out Circulation Plan La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 3-8 1097 1098 ATTACHMENT 5 Table II-b Level Of Service Description Mid -Link and Uninterrupted Flow Level of (duality of Traffic Flow Volume/Capacity Service Ratio A Free flowing, low volumes, high speed; speed not restricted by other vehicles in the traffic stream. o.00 - o.bo B Operating speeds and maneuverability in the range of stable flow, but presence by other traffic begins to be noticeable. 'Freedom to select desired speeds is relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to maneuver. o.61 - 0.70 C Operating speeds and maneuverability significantly controlled by other traffic Quality of operations still within the range of stable flow. 0.71- o.So D Tolerable operating speeds, high traffic density but stable flows; often used as design standard in urban areas. At this level, speed and freedom to maneuver are severely restricted. Drivers experience general discomfort and inconvenience. o.81 - o.go E At or near maximum traffic volume a roadway can Accommodate during peak traffic periods. Low speed but uniform traffic density. "Maximum Capacity". Highly susceptible to breakdowns in flow. o.91 - 1.00 F System failure; long queues of traffic; unstable flows; stoppages of long duration; traffic volume and speed can drop to zero; traffic volume will be less than the volume which occurs at Level of Service E. Not Meaningful Source: Highway Capacity Manual, `transportation Research Board - Special Report zog, National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C. 1997. CIRCULATION 1 1I099 4 1100 DEPARTMENT REPORT I TEM NO. grams port November 2016 - Summary Programs Events 141, Amount served P Amount of classes/events/rentals W Revenue generated 1101 Programs - Detail Chair Massage Personal Training Zumba Morning Zumba Day Taekwondo Beginning 4-8 yrs. Taekwondo Intermediate 4-8 yrs. Taekwondo Advanced 9 yrs- - up Sunset Yoga Reiki 2 *Senior Tennis Croup Intellectual Wellness Cinema Discussion History of the Middle East* SCAN Health Insurance' Medicare Advantage Plans* i Wellness Bread Distribution` Master Gardener Speaker` Herb & Vegetable Garden Group Fara's Food Volunteers & Hours 22 Volunteers assisted at the Wellness Center for a total of 65 hours for the month of November Social Services* Bereavement Group Egg Cafe Looks Who's in the Lobby: -Senior Care Solutions -Voter Registration Sunline Bus Passes Financial Consultation Legal Consultation Low Income Heating & Energy Assistance Program Health Insurance Counseling Advocacy Program Sports Programs Open Gym Volleyball" Open Gym Basketball' Creative Wellness *Denotes Free Programs/ Services La Quinta Glee Ballroom Dancing Beginning Ballroom Dance Intermediate Friday Night Dance Ukulele Players Advanced Social Wellness Mah Jongg *La Quinta Voices Social Bridge *Woodcarvers November Luncheon 'Putting for Fun Movie Mondays* Wii Bowling` Friday Night Ballroom Dance` Events - Detail Veterans Day Tribute November 11 at City Hall/Civic Center Campus Hikes with Philip Ferranti • 'November 3 at La Quinta Cove Nature Hike: Boo Hoff to Bear Creek Loop November 19 at Top of the Cove Blight Adventures • November 26 at Top of the Cove Programs 2000.................................... ar r_ c 0----- --------�--- 2015 2016 E Leisure 0 Sports 0 Wellness Center Wellness Center Free Programs Events 500---------------------------------- 400 ............................ ......... •a 300---------------------........ c 200----------------------------- Q100----------------------------- 0_____ - -- -- --- 2015 2015 ■ Veterans ©ay Tribute ■ Night Adventures Po Philip Ferranti & Nature hikes 1102 Fitness Center - Detail • Member visits increased by 831 visits.. • Sold more daily fit passes compared to same time last year. • Continue to see increased attendance for expanded Saturday hours Thank You to Wellness Center Staff Rigo Reyes Or., wanted to express his gratitude to all the staff at the Wellness Center with a home made cake to share with everyone. Rigo came in 1st Place during the October Fitness Challenge and he let everyone know that the kindness and daily encouragement he receives at the Wellness Center has helped him to lose over 80 pounds since he joined as a fitness member in February 2016. November Saturday Visits 200 U C 100 Esc 0 141-1-1 4201E E 6:30-gam 0 9-11 am N 11 am-1pm Rentals - Detail Parks & Fields - Sports • La Quinta Park - La Quinta AYSO • La Quinta Park - Desert Boot Camp • Sports Complex - La Quinta Youth & Sports • Sports Complex - PDLQ Football • Colonel Mitchell Paige - Friday Night Lights • Colonel Mitchell Paige - La Quinta AYSO Buildings • Wellness Center - Church Services • Wellness Center - Private Rental • Library Community Roorn - Private Rental • B&C Gym - Private Rental • Museum Meeting Room/Courtyard - Private Rental Parks • La Quinta Park - 1 Park Party Rentals • Fritz Burns Park - 1 Park Party Rental • Fritz Burns Park - 1 Tennis Court Rental • Cove Oasis Trail - Private Rental Fitness Center - Passes L 0 50 100 150 200 250 E daily Passes Sold Memberships Sold Fitness Center - Visits 5000--------- 4000-----------------------I-- ------ 3000 -------- -------------- a 2000 -------------...... Q 1000-------- 0 --- ------- 2015 2016 ■ Member Visits Rentals 100----------------------- ------------------ go------------------------------- ---------- 80- . -------------------- --------- 70---------------------- ---------- 60 ----• ---------------------- 50.........---•---------- ---------- 40 ...... ..------------------- 20---------------------- ---------- 10---------------------- --------- 2015 2016 LQ Park Fieid ® SportS Complex N Col. Paige Wellness Center La Quinta Park Fritz Bums Park Cave Oasis 1103 Monthly Revenue & Participation 25000 ;------------------------------ -------------------------------- ------------------ A -- A A A A � r � 15000 ,_______________________ _w_______ L___________ r i i I � r l I 100010 ;- ------------------- --- I I 5000 r ---- ------------------------- r r (7 LJ L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - ` - - - - - - -- - -- - - - .- - - - - - .- - - - - ------------------ July August September October November Total Reveune E Total Participation This chart will be updated with monthly data points to reflect the total revenue and participation for that month. As each month is added, the data will show the trend for the 2016/17 operating y ea r. 1104 DEPARTMENT REPORT ITEM NO. 5 1) 0:: V: ' ��' �a�k�,>r� .yi Wit. �'.' ✓ �'� - 1 k A L Ry ,y 77 �'.� I�a r * 1/'1r►/1I GEM ofahc DESERT — The Design and Development Department represents one of six City departments, and consists of six divisions: The Hub, Planning, Building, Public Works Development, Engineering Services, and Administration. The Hub serves as a one -stop shop for La Quinta patrons. It is the central location for obtaining permits for planning, building, engineering, garage sales, and special events. The Hub assists customers through the permitting process from initial questions and pre -application meetings through inspections and final certificate of occupancy. Below are some November 2016 metrics: ,42 ,ect FE , $864,857.08 610T Fees Collected% Customer Satisfaction Survey In June 2016, The Hub launched a survey to measure the satisfaction of its customers. The survey used a one to five star rating system, with "Five Stars" being excellent. The Hub Customer Satisfaction survey results for the month of November were stellar with all categories receiving over 91% "Five Star" ratings, specifically Quality of Service receiving 98.8% rating! 198 96 94 92 90 88 Percent of Customers Rating Service as Five Stars ■ Helpfulness Wait Time Quality DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1105 Administrative Permits Includes sign applications, temporary use permits, minor use permits, final landscaping plans, etc. Submitted Applications Year 2016 2015 November 3 4 Year To Date 73 80 I Building Permits Submitted Year 2016 2015 November 116 143 November eTRAKiT 15 14 Year To Date 1,913 2,212 Entitlement Projects Includes site development permits, conditional use permits, subdivision maps, etc. Submitted Applications Year 2016 2015 November 10 6 Year To Date 40 51 Building Permits Issued Year 2016 2015 November 119 136 November eTRAKiT 19 20 Year To Date 1,708 2,067 Year 2016 2015 November 961 856 Year To Date 8,437 9,700 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1106 Public Works Develoament The Development Division provides engineering assistance with a variety of permits During the month of November 2016, the following number of permits were issued: Short Term Vacation Rental Program The Short Term Vacation Rental Program continues to grow, as new properties register each month. During the month of November 2016, the following permits were issued and TOT collected: STVRP TOT Collected Year 2016 2015 November $183,773.08 $23,541.44 Year to Date $1,547,209.41 $916,982.05 STVRP Permits Permits Issued in November 21 Current Active Permits 833 Engineering Services The Engineering Services Division provides engineering design and construction oversight on a variety of infrastructure projects that help keep La Quinta safe and beautiful. Highlighted below are some activities for November 2016: • The Civic Center Campus, Fire Station 70, and Fritz Burns Park Turf Conversion Projects werejointly awarded the American Public Works Association 2015/16 Project of Merit Award in the category of revitalization. • Work is underway for the YMCA Building Turf Conversion, which entails the disposal or relocation of existing landscape fea- tures; and installation of new irrigation and landscaping features. Work is anticipated to be completed in mid -January. • Work is underway for the Cove Oasis Trailhead Improvements project, which entails creating a community meeting place at the westerly end of Call Tecate. Work is anticipated to be completed in mid -December. _ Division ♦ 62 requests for service were recorded in City's GORequest system in November 2016, including: 0 Operational checks of crosswalks, warning beacons, and flashing stop signs 0 Repair of safety and street sign lighting 0 Installation of CycleGrip bike detection symbols a DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1107 1108 W DEPARTMENT REPORT I TEM NO. 6 FACILITIES DEPARTMENT NOVEMBER 2016 MAINTENANCE EXPENDITURES ,370 Facilities is responsible for maintenance through- Parks $public Works $1616 out the City, and is comprised of three divisions: Buildings $80,370 2 Parks, Public Works Maintenance and Buildings. Total Expenditures: $104,880 Total Task Hours: 1512 POSITIVE SURVEY FEEDBACK FROM RESIDENTS: "It works!! "Prompt response plus a follow up phone call". "Quality service and speed that no other cities we lived in can match! Very impressive! Thank you". ATTACHMENTS: 1. Parks Maintenance Expenditures by Task for November. 2. Public Works Maintenance Expenditures by Task for November. 3. Building Maintenance Expenditures by Task for November. 4. Customer Satisfaction Survey Details for November. 1109 1110 ATTACHMENT 1 Parks Maintenance Expenditures by Task for November 2016 Playground Equipment Insp $891.03 Athletic Fields Insp Trail Maintenance $95 79 $675.16 1 I Seminar Training 928.12 Office Administration $4,186.60 MiS.V $137.36 Debris/Litter Removal $892.84 Lighting/Electrical Sign Maint $$27.11 27.11 Total Maintenace Expenditures: $16,370 Fencing/Wall Repairs $164.47 Fred Wolff Trail $218.04 1112 All f ilk Ao/ CITY HALL COURTYARD FLOWER ' POTS I INSTALLATION - a AFTER Y • r � 9 j jj fu q3. _ 3693L7d7 � I _ _ I 1114 . . . ........... , -4 1116 BEFORE .� AFTER AFTER GRAFFITI REMOVAL & VANDALISM REPAIRS 1117 1118 Nft_ 1119 1120 P- Pavement Marking/Legends/Striping $18, 545.84 Irrigation/ Weeds/Shrub Tree Trimming $15,691.84 MiIIIIII Debris/Litter Removal Flood Control Graffitti Removal Inspection Seminars/Training ,treet Sig n 0. Landscape/Irrigation Contract Mgt $6,591.76 Vehicle/Equipment Maint Yard /Building Maint Meeting Debris/Litter Removal Concrete Repairs $12,133.08 Storm Drain Repair Graff itti Removal Special Events Inspection $5,253.65 Irrigation/ Weeds/Shrub $7,224.33 F-,. Tree Trimming Flood Control Office _ Pavement Marking/Legends/Striping Gutter/Median Sand Removal Pothole or Street Repair ir Street Signs Vandalism Repairs Seminars/Training Vehicle/Equipment Maint/Services 1122 ATTACHMENT 3 Building Maintenance Expenditures by Task for November 2016 ■ Meetings $253.66 Paint $217.7 Personnel Requests $280.87 Janatorial $226.34 Plumbing $120.12 _1 Preventative Maint Tasks $309.84 Electrical $91.09 Fire Station/Personnel Requests $60.93 Carpentry & Hardware $82.38 Total Maintenance Expenditures: $8,183 1123 1124 -ice r-7 AV- r � f BEFORE . -A 1126 BEFORE . hL MAM T_ NO .I ■■_�. �. 1MEiICMEI1a - .. ' ;` AFTER 1128 Library LED Light Conversion 8 lights converted to LED 256 total watts reduced to 144 watts 1129 1130 ATTACHMENT 4 Customer Satisfaction Survey Details 11/01/2016 to 11/30/2016 Request: 23815 Survey Entered: 11-14-2016 Request Entered: 10/22/2016 Closed: 10/25/2016 Days Open: 3 Topic: Debris/Litter Removal/Right of Way Maint -1011 Employee: James Lindsey Customer: Dori Quill Description: There is a lot of dirt and debris on the center island bricks at the intersection of Washington and miles. There also some construction cones in the center island that need to be removed just north of miles on Washington Reason Closed: Work done Employee Effectiveness: Good Response Times: Good Employee Courtesy: Good Expectations Met: Met Request: 23856 Survey Entered: 11-02-2016 Request Entered: 10/25/2016 Closed: 10/26/2016 Days Open: 1 Topic: Parks/Trail Maintenance Employee: Robert Ambriz Jr. Customer: Bill Aitken Description: Trash Reason Closed: Work done. Employee Effectiveness: N/A Response Times: Superior Employee Courtesy: N/A Expectations Met: Exceeded Request: 23990 Survey Entered:11-08-2016 Request Entered: 10/30/2016 Closed: 11/01/2016 Days Open: 2 Topic: Parks/Fencing/Wall Repairs Employee: Robert Ambriz Jr. Customer: linda hagood Description: the latch between the large dog park and the small dog park is broken and the gate cannot be shut closed Reason Closed: Replaced broken latch. Employee Effectiveness: Superior Response Times: Superior Employee Courtesy: Superior Expectations Met: Met Comments: The new latch locks the door between the large and small dog park. It used to shut but not lock. It would be good to be able to allow dogs under owner supervision to be introduced into the small dog park to welcome a new dog. Sometimes a larger new dog starts in the small dog park and then calmer large dogs come in to gradually introduce the dog to the other dogs. Used to be able Ito do that. Can we get that fixed as well? Thank you 1131 Request: 24081 Survey Entered: 11-10-2016 Request Entered: 11/02/2016 Closed: 11/02/2016 Days Open: 0 Topic: Irrigation/ Weeds/Shrub/Tree Trimming - 1040 Customer: Dori Quill Employee: James Lindsey Description: The planters in front of the new movie theater have many drips with no plants in them. Reason Closed: The developer of the property, Mr. Jack Tar, has scheduled to have the plants replaced before or by the end of this month. Employee Effectiveness: Superior Response Times: Superior Employee Courtesy: Superior Expectations Met: Met Request: 24167 Survey Entered: 11-16-2016 Request Entered: 11/04/2016 Closed: 11/09/2016 Days Open: 5 Topic: FM/Plumbing Customer: Christin castellanos Employee: Bob Mignogna Description: Women's restroom stall #1 on blacktop out by field at Paige Middle School. Toilet spraying water. Reason Closed: Plumber made the repair Employee Effectiveness: N/A Response Times: Superior Employee Courtesy: Superior Expectations Met: Below Comments: The issue was not resolved. The ticket said closed but not fixed. Commissioner sent Robert email follow up. The toilet was still spraying water last week on Friday for FNL. Request: 24171 Survey Entered: 11-16-2016 Request Entered: 11/05/2016 Closed: 11/09/2016 Days Open: 4 Topic: SilverRock Resort Employee: Steve Howlett Customer: John Carnie Description: Can we have the waterfalls at silver rock turned back on? It seems silly to not showcase this beautiful city feature. The drought conditions have vastly improved. Let's turn the faucet back on. John carnie. Thanks Reason Closed: Each year, the water feature is drained for cleaning and maintenance while the course is closed in October. The water feature has been filled and is operating daily between 6a.m. and 4 p.m. Employee Effectiveness: Superior Response Times: Superior Employee Courtesy: Superior Expectations Met: Exceeded Comments: Prompt response plus a follow up phone call. 1132 Request: 24172 Survey Entered: 11-08-2016 Request Entered: 11/05/2016 Closed: 11/07/2016 Days Open: 2 Topic: Street Sign Repair/Maint - 1010 Customer: Albert Nguyen Employee: James Lindsey Description: the corner street sign's metal post is damaged and badly cracked (some car hit it previously/before we moved in). it looks very weak and could break/fall down any time. please repair the post. thank you! Reason Closed: Made repairs to sign as requested. Removed damaged post and anchor and installed new Employee Effectiveness: Superior Response Times: Superior Employee Courtesy: Superior Expectations Met: Exceeded Comments: Quality service and speed that no other cities we lived in can match! Very impressive! Thank you. Request: 24179 Survey Entered: 11-21-2016 Request Entered: 11/07/2016 Closed: 11/14/2016 Days Open: 7 Topic: Sidewalk Repair/Concrete C&G-1007 Employee: James Lindsey Customer: Kevin Dolan Description: Steel Metal surroundings of Palm trees on Ave La Fonda are coming up and if stepped on create a very dangerous situation. Reason Closed: Adjusted and put ultra bound on steel metal around Palm streets on La Fonda. Work done Employee Effectiveness: Superior Response Times: Superior Employee Courtesy: Superior Expectations Met: Exceeded Request: 24448 Survey Entered: 11-30-2016 Request Entered: 11/18/2016 Closed: 11/23/2016 Days Open: 5 Topic: Storm Drain Repair and Maint - 1023 Employee: James Lindsey Customer: Robin Markson Description: The drain at the end of our cul de sac on Via Caliente need to be flush when you get a chance. Reason Closed: Work done, flushed under sidewalk drains: Thank you for reporting the irrigation problem at (insert location) we will have this repaired by (insert date). If you require further assistance, please contact (insert name) at (760) 777-(XXXX). Employee Effectiveness: Good Response Times: Superior Employee Courtesy: N/A Expectations Met: Exceeded Comments: Thank you, always for your a quick response:) 1033 Request: 24479 Survey Entered: 11-30-2016 Request Entered: 11/21/2016 Closed: 11/23/2016 Days Open: 2 Topic: Debris/Litter Removal/Right of Way Maint -1011 Customer: John Carnie Political sign left on ground. Pick up sign work done Employee: James Lindsey Description: Reason Closed: Employee Effectiveness: Superior Response Times: Superior Employee Courtesy: Superior Expectations Met: Exceeded Comments: It works!! 1034 REPORTS AND I NFORMATI ONAL ITEM NO.23 COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MINUTES MONDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2016 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the La Quinta Community Services Commission was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Chair Johnson. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Commissioners Johnson, Simonds, Chiapperini, Quill ABSENT: Commissioner Lambert PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chair Johnson led the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA • Kay Wolff, La Quinta, CA: voiced concerns regarding cultural relations • Linda Williams, La Quinta, CA: voiced community concerns • Mario Sewell, La Quinta, CA: voiced community issues PRESENTATIONS 1. YMCA OF THE DESERT POOL PARTICIPATION & REVENUE UPDATE Presented by Manager Holguin. • Pool expansion and improvements - part of 5 year CIP • Discussed heating options: heating blanket poses drowning liability • Fritz Burns Pool: primary attendance from Cove residents There was a consensus among commissioners to request Council to consider reprioritizing Fritz Burns Pool improvements. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. FACILITIES REPORT - SPOHN RANCH UPDATE (verbal) Presented by Director Howlett • No new information available, agreement is still with the City Attorney Presented by Supervisor Ambriz. 2. DESERT EXHIBITION OF ART (DESERT X) UPDATE (verbal) Presented by Executive Director Betinski. • New proposal: Date Farmers • Permanent 1135 Possibly include a temporary piece • $50,000 3. COMMUNITY PROGRAMS AND WELLNESS REPORT - SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER 2016 Presented by Supervisor Calderon. 4. REPORT FROM COMMISSIONERS REGARDING MEETINGS ATTENDED ACTION ITEMS 1. APPROVE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 10, 2016 Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Simonds/Chiapperini to approve the October 10, 2016 Community Services Commission minutes as submitted. Motion passed unanimously. 2. NOMINATION FOR 2017 SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARD PROGRAM Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Johnson/Simonds to nominate Linda Williams for the 2017 Senior Inspiration Award. Motion passed unanimously. 3. CONSIDERATION OF PARTICIPATION IN THE CHRISTMAS TREE LIGHTING EVENT Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Johnson/Quill to appoint Commissioners Simonds and Chiapperini to assist in hosting the Christmas Tree Lighting Event being held in Old Town on Friday, December 2, 2016. Motion passed unanimously. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Chiapperini/Quill to adjourn the meeting at 6:56 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, G-S4CAUDHRY, Administrative Tee-hnician City of La Quinta, California 1136 REPORTS AND I NFORMATI ONAL I TEM NO.24 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2016 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Chairperson Bettencourt. PRESENT: Commissioners Blum, Fitzpatrick, Quill, Wright and Chairperson Bettencourt. ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Planning Manager Gabriel Perez, Assistant City Attorney Morgan Wazlaw, Principal Planner Jay Wuu, Principal Engineer Bryan McKinney, Executive Assistant Wanda Wise -Latta, and Office Assistant Carley Votaw Commissioner Wright led the Commission in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT - None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Staff stated that the applicant for Public Hearing Item No. 1 requested to be moved to No. 2. The Commission concurred. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Fitzpatrick/Blum to confirm the agenda as amended. AYES: Commissioners Blum, Fitzpatrick, Quill, Wright and Chairperson Bettencourt. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Motion passed. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approval of the minutes of August 9, 2016. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Blum to approve the Planning Commission Minutes of August 9, 2016, as submitted with the following amendment to page one, under Call to Order and read as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1 SEPTEMBER 13, 2016 1137 Staff Present: Planning Manager Gabriel Perez, Principal Planner Jay Wuu, Consulting Planner Nicole Criste, Assistant City Attorney Morgan Wazlaw, Executive Assistant Wanda Wise -Latta, and Office fice Assistant Carley Votaw. And the following amendment to page four prior to adjournment: Chairman Bettencourt introduced Assistant City Attorney Morgan Wazlaw. AYES: Commissioners, Blum, Quill, Wright and Chairperson Bettencourt. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: Fitzpatrick. Motion Passed. Item order was rearranged per the applicant's request and the Commission's concurrence. 1. Environmental Assessment 2015-0007, Zone Change 2015-0003 and Tentative Tract Map 36561 (TTM 2015-0008) submitted by Prism Realty Corporation proposing to subdivide a 12.25 acre site into 36 residential lots. CEQA: the Design and Development Department has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and is recommending that a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact be adopted. Location: 54721 Monroe Street. Principal Planner Jay Wuu presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Design and Development Department. Principal Planner Wuu provided a summarization of the proposed zoning change and stated that the applicant requested the equestrian overlay remain as there are active equestrian uses on the site and should the tract not move forward as planned, it is expected that the equestrian uses will remain. Discussion followed between the Commission and staff and included: Confirmation by staff that the existing residence on the site is not on the historical survey. Some members of the Commission shared their concerns regarding the lack of more explicit documentation with regards to the request to approve a zone change and tract map as well as the consideration of offsite improvements. Chairperson Bettencourt declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN at 6:16 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 2 SEPTEMBER 13, 2016 1138 Public Speaker: Brook B. Morris, Prism Realty Corporation, Costa Mesa, CA - introduced himself as the President of Prism Realty Corporation. Mr. Morris provided background regarding the site. Discussion followed between the Commission and Mr. Morris regarding Grading Pad elevations Equestrian overlay Lack of a regulatory document with regards to finished pad grades Cutting or filling against existing perimeter walls Staff clarified for the Commission that the landscape plan is reviewed at the administrative level. Staff also stated that the Commission could add a condition to have the landscape plan be considered by the Planning Commission. The Commission asked for clarification regarding when the equestrian use would go away once the final map is recorded and the zone change occurred. Staff indicated with the recordation of the final map and the zone change, the non -conforming equestrian use rights would be eliminated once development of the site occurred. Staff stated that the Municipal Code contains a section that addresses existing non -conformities and as long as the non -conforming use is not being expanded upon, the non -conforming use can remain subject to the restrictions in the Municipal Code. Commissioner Quill shared his concerns as to whether there was outreach to the Vista Santa Rosa Community Council, residents and property owners. Staff addressed Commissioner Quill's inquiry regarding the possibility of connecting streets or trails between the applicant's property and Griffin Ranch. Staff stated that the Southeast Area Overlay was adopted to address similar concerns as shared by the Commissioner Quill, but the overlay is now being eliminated as a result of the Development Code Tune Up. Staff also noted that the proposed project did not qualify under the Southeast Area Overlay requirements. Staff stated a call had been received from a Griffin Ranch homeowner who indicated they represented multiple homeowners who were not interested in internal connections between their development and any potential neighboring developments. Public Speaker: Christine Neumann, 82425 Avenue 55, Thermal, CA - Mrs. Neumann introduced herself and stated that she and her husband own 29 acres on southeast corner of Avenue 54 and Monroe Street in addition to a 20- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 3 SEPTEMBER 13, 2016 1139 acre parcel at 82425 Avenue 55. Mrs. Neumann shared her concerns regarding the change in zoning and the possibility of a lack of a buffer between the existing equestrian properties and the tract home concept. Staff confirmed that should the equestrian overlay be removed from the Tentative Tract map, the equestrian improvements along Monroe Street adjacent to this area would be eliminated in order to match the perimeter treatments that were approved for Monterra, the Estates at La Quinta, and the Abarca tract. Public Speaker: Mr. Brook Morris, Prism Realty Corporation, Prism - Mr. Morris acknowledged that the proposed request is consistent with the General Plan already adopted and stated that the Saddle Club entitlements expired. Chairperson Bettencourt declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 7:01 p.m. Commissioner Wright asked that the Site Development Permit come before the Commission at a future Public Hearing. Commissioner Quill expressed concerns with regards to the outreach to the community especially those in Vista Santa Rosa, the density of the proposed tract map, and the depth of the lots. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Blum/Wright to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016-013 recommending to the City Council adoption of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and approval of a Zone Change 2015-0007 and Tentative Tract Map 36561 to subdivide a 12.25 acre site into 36 residential lots and the Site Development Permit including architecture and landscaping plans shall come before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing. AYES: Commissioners Blum, Wright and Chairperson Bettencourt. NOES: Fitzpatrick and Quill. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Motion passed. 2. Site Development Permit 2016-0001 and Conditional Use Permit 2016-0002 submitted by R & R Development Company LLC proposing to construct a 37,776 square foot fitness center on approximately 5.7 acres of the Jefferson Square Commercial Center. CEQA: adheres to previously -approved Environmental Assessment 2002-462 and no further analysis is required. Location: Southwest corner of Jefferson Street and Fred Waring Drive. Planning Manager Gabriel Perez presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Design and Development Department. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 4 SEPTEMBER 13, 2016 1140 Discussion followed between the Commission and staff regarding: Hours of operation Serving of beer and wine Use of facility as a concert venue Drainage concerns with the new use at the proposed site Chairperson Bettencourt declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN at 7:36 p.m. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Brendon Kelly, architect - Mr. Kelly introduced himself. He stated that that the name of fitness company is confidential at this time and responded to the Commissioners' concerns regarding hours of operations and the possibility of expanding hours to round the clock operation. He also stated that beer and wine would not be sold at the facility and the facility would not be used as a concert venue. Mr. Kelly said that they accept the conditions placed on the project as indicated in a letter dated September 9, 2016. Chairperson Bettencourt declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 7:47 p.m. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Fitzpatrick/Wright to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016-014 approving Site Development Permit 2016-0001 and Conditional Use Permit 2016-0002, and a finding of consistency with Environmental Assessment 2002- 462 as submitted by staff, and the following correction to Condition No. 4 of Conditional Use Permit 2016-0002 as follows: "Hours of operation are permitted seven days a week and 24-hours a day. Days and hours of operation may be modified by the fitness center operator." AYES: Commissioners Blum, Fitzpatrick, Quill, Wright and Chairperson Bettencourt. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Motion passed. BUSINESS SESSION 1. Consideration of a Call -Up Review request for Sign Program Amendment 2016- 0001 for the Plaza La Quinta Shopping Center. CEQA: Categorically exempt from Environmental Review pursuant to Section 15301 (existing facilities). Location: 78267 Highway 111. Planning Manager Gabriel Perez presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Design and Development Department. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 5 SEPTEMBER 13, 2016 1141 Planning Manager Perez stated that as part of the Development Code Tune Up process, staff level decisions are shared with the Commission. He said that at any time, a Commissioner can call up a staff -level decision to the Planning Commission. He said that Business Session No. 1 requires Commission action to call the item up and presented the Sign Program Amendment. Discussion followed between the Commission and staff regarding:: Existing hanging signs at the center; Staff provided clarification regarding the proposed parapet and its proposed location on the ridgeline of the building; and Lack of consistency with regards to the lettering on the proposed signage. Motion - A motion was made by Commissioner Quill to call-up review request for Sign Program Amendment 2016-0001 for Plaza La Quinta Shopping Center. Motion failed due to a lack of a second. 2. Consideration of an Appeal of Sign Program Amendment 2016-0001 for the Plaza La Quinta Shopping Center. CEQA: Categorically exempt from Environmental Review pursuant to Section 15301 (existing facilities). Location: 78267 Highway 111. Assistant City Attorney Wazlaw stated that based upon the previous vote regarding Business Session No. 1, the Commission did not have the authority to vote on Business Session No. 2 and the item was not heard. COMMISSIONER ITEMS Commissioner Fitzpatrick commended staff regarding their efforts in working with the La Quinta Historical Society to develop guidelines as part of the permitting process that would identify historic structures in the city. Commissioner Wright concurred with Commissioner Fitzpatrick and hoped that the historical photographic reference process would continue. Chairperson Bettencourt in concurrence with the Commission stated that the Commission is available to assist with a development agreement review process. He also suggested that staff might consider providing an update on incomplete subdivision tracts located in the City. Staff commented that the City's inspection staff regularly checks the condition of incomplete tracts to assure such items as the status of PM-10 compliance and the condition of the fencing surrounding the tract. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES M SEPTEMBER 13, 2016 1142 Commissioner Fitzpatrick inquired as to whether traffic plans were available for the upcoming Desert Trip event in Indio. Staff stated that applications for encroachment permits have not been submitted at this time and staff will provide an update regarding Desert Trip and traffic issues at the next Planning Commission meeting. STAFF ITEMS - Planning Manager Perez provided an update to the Commission regarding: Council consideration of disbanding the Architecture and Landscaping Review Board at its September 20, 2016 meeting; Village EIR on city website; Items that will come before the Planning Commission at a future date: Crab Pot restaurant expansion; Development Agreement update; historic preservation efforts by the City; and review of cell tower locations, maintenance condition and status Update on the TJ Maxx and Ulta stores In response to the Commission's inquiry, Assistant City Attorney Wazlaw will provide guidelines to the Commission regarding their commenting on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan available for review and comment on the City's website. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Blum to adjourn this meeting at 8:20 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, WANDA WISE-LATTA, Executive Assistant City of La Quinta, California PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 7 SEPTEMBER 13, 2016 1143 1144 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2016 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission was called to order at 6:02 p.m. by Chairperson Bettencourt. PRESENT: Commissioners Blum, Fitzpatrick, Quill, Wright and Chairperson Bettencourt ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Planning Manager Gabriel Perez, Assistant City Attorney Morgan Wazlaw, Principal Planner Jay Wuu, Principal Engineer Bryan McKinney, Executive Assistant Wanda Wise -Latta, and Office Assistant Carley Votaw Commissioner Fitzpatrick led the Commission in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT - None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA - Confirmed APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Blum/Fitzpatrick to approve the Planning Commission Minutes of September 13, 2016, as submitted. AYES: Commissioners, Blum, Fitzpatrick, Quill, Wright and Chairperson Bettencourt. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Motion Passed. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Village Use Permit 2013-048 submitted by Robert J. Novella for the consideration of a 1,800 square -foot expansion of the Crab Pot Restaurant inclusive of an interior dining area, a seasonal indoor/outdoor dining area and a restroom. Project: Crab Pot Restaurant Expansion. CEQA: Exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15301 Existing Facility. Location: 78121 Avenida La Fonda. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1 OCTOBER 11, 2016 1145 Principal Planner Jay Wuu presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Design and Development Department. Staff addressed the Commission's questions with regards to land use setbacks in the Village; parking in lieu fee; the in lieu fee fund; and the available parking spaces within the village. Chairperson Bettencourt declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN at 6:21 p.m. Public Speaker: Robert J. Novella, Crab Pot Restaurant - introduced himself and stated he was in support of staffs recommendation and accepted the conditions of approval as written. Mr. Novella addressed the Commission's questions regarding hours of operation; deliveries; replacement of the tile treatment with a parapet on the south elevation of the proposed expansion; and roofing material being used on the expansion. Staff addressed Chairperson Bettencourt's question regarding hours of operation and stated that if the Commission would have an interest in adjusting the hours of operation, it could be addressed in the Conditions of Approval. Commissioner Fitzpatrick stated that, although not a direction, she thought it would be nice to see a mural painted on the eastside of the building possibly as part of the City's Art in Public Places program. Mr. Novella shared his concerns regarding the letter received from Mr. Wells Marvin and provided pictures for the Commission's review. Chairperson Bettencourt declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 6:30 p.m. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Blum/Wright to approve Resolution No. 2016-015 of the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California approving Village Use Permit 2013-048 for an expansion to the Crab Pot Restaurant and provide to the applicant the option to determine the treatment to be used for the top of the south elevation of the expansion. AYES: Commissioners Blum, Fitzpatrick, Quill, Wright and Chairperson Bettencourt. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Motion passed. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL - None PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 2 OCTOBER 11, 2016 1146 COMMISSIONER ITEM Commissioner Fitzpatrick acknowledged the event that occurred in the City of Palm Springs and the loss of two of their police officers. STAFF ITEMS 1. City of La Quinta Historic Preservation Update Planning Manager Perez presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Design and Development Department. Planning Manager Perez said that in 1993, the City adopted the Historic Preservation Ordinance; in 1994 the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) was appointed; and in 1995 the City received State certification as a Certified Local Government. He stated that the City's Historic Preservation initiatives have included a Historic Resources Survey conducted in 1997 that identified 72 properties as eligible for landmark status; in 2006 a Historic Site Survey was conducted and identified 183 buildings which were recorded into the California Historical Resources Inventory; and in 2011 the historic resource data was digitized into a searchable database which is available on the City's website. Planning Manager Perez said that currently 262 buildings have been identified in the historic survey; 101 properties contribute to a thematic district in the Cove area and 111 properties are listed as historical resources under CEQA by their eligibility for the California Register of Historic Resources or for local designation by the City. He shared that with the elimination of the HPC, the City Council encouraged future historic preservation efforts to continue and include the leadership of the La Quinta Historical Society. In addition, he stated a historic building tracking system with the Trakit permitting software alerts permit technicians of buildings in the historic resources inventory before a building permit is issued thus allowing planning staff to coordinate with the La Quinta Historical Society for review of building permits when building alterations are being proposed. Public Speaker: Linda Williams, La Quinta Historical Society - introduced herself and thanked the City Council and staff for allowing the Historical Society to be a part of the process to ensure that historic preservation takes place. Ms. Williams stated that the majority of owners of historical properties in La Quinta understand the significance and value of their property. She also stated that the Historical Society has developed relationships with many of these homeowners who have restored their homes. Ms. Williams introduced fellow La Quinta Historical Society Board Members Jeff and Val Smith. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 3 OCTOBER 11, 2016 1147 Public Speaker: Jeff Smith, La Quinta Historical Society - Mr. Smith spoke regarding the Historical Society's role in the City's preservation efforts. As a member of the La Quinta Historical Society, Commissioner Fitzpatrick said she would like to see documentation of the Ahmanson Ranch House at SilverRock Resort as it is in its current condition before moving forward in the reuse of the Ahmanson Ranch House. Commissioner Wright stated that as the La Quinta Historical Preservation Commission was born out of the La Quinta Historical Society, it was fitting that the Quinta Historical Society is once more a part of the process regarding historical preservation in the City of La Quinta. Assistant City Attorney Morgan Wazlaw addressed Chairperson Bettencourt's question as to whether or not the Commission should comment on any item or project that might be coming before the Commission. Assistant City Attorney Wazlaw advised that as a member of the public, a commissioner could comment on a project; however, should that project come before the Commission, the commissioner would not be able to participate in any discussion regarding that project. Planning Manager Perez advised the Commission that the SilverRock Site Development Permit will come before the Commission on October 25, 2016. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Fitzpatrick/Wright to adjourn this meeting at 7:19 p.m. in memory and honor of Palm Springs Police Officer Jose "Gil" Vega and Officer Lesley Zerebny and in recognition of the La Quinta Police Department and its Fire Service First Responders. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, WANDA WISE-LATTA, Executive Assistant City of La Quinta, California PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 4 OCTOBER 11, 2016 1148 REPORTSAND I NFORMATI ONAL ITEM NO. 25 ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW BOARD MINUTES WEDNESDAY, JUNE 15, 2016 CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the La Quinta Architectural and Landscaping Review Board was called to order at 10:00 a.m. by Principal Planner Jay Wuu. PRESENT: Board Members Richard Gray, Kevin McCune and Ray Rooker ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Design and Development Director Tim Jonasson, Planning Manager Gabriel Perez, Principal Planner Jay Wuu, Associate Planner Carlos Flores, Management Specialist Carla Triplett and Executive Assistant Wanda Wise -Latta Board Member McCune led the Board in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT - None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA - Confirmed APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Board Members McCune/Rooker to approve the Architectural and Landscaping Review Board Meeting Minutes of April 6, 2016, as submitted. YES: Board Members McCune and Rooker. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: Board Member Gray. Motion passed. BUSINESS SESSION 1. Site Development Permit 2016-0003 submitted by VTL Palizada, LLC for the consideration of two recreational areas, landscaping, walls, and entry gates within a proposed 320 residential lot development on approximately 78 acres. Project: Bellaseno. Location: southeast corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 60. Associate Planner Carlos Flores introduced himself and presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Design and Development Department. Ms. Cathy Cieslikowski, Associate with RGA Landscape Architects, Inc., Palm Desert, CA - introduced herself and answered the Board's questions. ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING SPECIAL MEETING REVIEW BOARD MINUTES 1 JUNE 15, 2016 1149 Ms. Sarah Jimenez, Associate with RGA Landscape Architects, Inc., Palm Desert, CA - introduced herself and answered the Board's questions. Ms. Susan Lindquist, Senior Director of Community Development with The True Life Companies, Newport Beach, CA - introduced herself and answered the Board's questions. Mr. George Handy, Architect with Bassenian Lagoni, Newport Beach, CA - introduced himself and answered the Board's questions. Discussion followed regarding recreational areas, hiking trail features, designated parking areas, age restrictions, architectural design, color palette and proposed landscaping. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Board Members Gray/McCune recommending to the Planning Commission approval of Site Development Permit 2016-0003, as submitted with staff's recommendations and the addition of the following conditions of approval: Shade trees and/or a shade structure will be added to parking areas. Smooth stucco finish on all buildings. Rounded corners on building edges with greater visibility. Accent lighting will be added along walking paths and hiking trails. Water facilities will be added for people and pets along hiking trails. Motion passed unanimously. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL - None REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS - None BOARD MEMBER ITEMS Board Member McCune expressed his gratitude towards Board Members' Gray and Rooker for all they have done while serving the Architectural and Landscaping Review Board. Board Member Gray recommended that the Architectural and Landscaping Review Board Member rotation schedule be adjusted to ensure that two board members are not exiting the board simultaneously. STAFF MEMBER ITEMS Planning Manager Perez announced that Mr. John Hansen was appointed to the Architectural and Landscaping Review Board for the upcoming term. One vacancy remains. ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING SPECIAL MEETING REVIEW BOARD MINUTES 2 JUNE 15, 2016 1150 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made and seconded by Board Members Gray/McCune to adjourn this meeting at 10:44 a.m. AYES: Board Members' Gray, McCune and Rooker. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Respectfully submitted, WANDA WISE-LATTA, Executive Assistant City of La Quinta, California ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING SPECIAL MEETING REVIEW BOARD MINUTES 3 JUNE 15, 2016 1151 1152 ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW BOARD MINUTES WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the La Quinta Architectural and Landscaping Review Board was called to order at 10:00 a.m. by Principal Planner Jay Wuu. PRESENT: Board Members John Hansen and Kevin McCune ABSENT: None 1ITTiL101lw QT" STAFF PRESENT: Planning Manager Gabriel Perez, Principal Planner Jay Wuu, Principal Engineer Bryan McKinney and Executive Assistant Wanda Wise -Latta Board Member McCune led the Board in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT - None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA - Confirmed APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Board Members McCune/Hansen to approve the Architectural and Landscaping Review Board Meeting Minutes of June 15, 2016, as submitted. AYES: Board Members Hansen and McCune. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. VACANCY: One. Motion passed. BUSINESS SESSION 1. Approval of Village Use Permit 2013-048 submitted by Robert J. Novella for a 1,800 square -foot expansion of the Crab Pot Restaurant inclusive of an interior dining area, a seasonal indoor/outdoor dining area and a restroom. Project: Crab Pot Restaurant Expansion. Location: 78121 Avenida La Fonda. Principal Planner Jay Wuu stated that the applicant was not present and asked the Board if it would like to hear the staff report or continue the item. The Board decided to move forward with the item and hear the staff report. Principal Planner Wuu presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Design and Development Department. ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING SPECIAL MEETING REVIEW BOARD MINUTES 1 SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 1153 Discussion followed regarding: • Location of new proposed restroom; • Seating capacity in the dining areas; and • Design of the top of the south elevation on the proposed new addition. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Board Members McCune/Hansen approving Village Use Permit 2013-048, as submitted with staffs recommendation and the following Board recommendation: Adjust the top of the south elevation by replacing the the treatment with a parapet to match the existing elevation. AYES: Board Members Hansen and McCune. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. VACANCY: One. Motion passed. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL - None REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS - None BOARD MEMBER ITEMS - None STAFF MEMBER ITEMS 1. Planning Manager Perez presented a report regarding the July 19, 2016 City Council Study Session item concerning Boards and Commissions Modifications. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made and seconded by Board Members McCune/Hansen to adjourn this meeting at 10:22 a.m. AYES: Board Members Hansen and McCune. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. VACANCY: One. Respectfully submitted, WANDA WISE-LATTA, Executive Assistant City of La Quinta, California ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING SPECIAL MEETING REVIEW BOARD MINUTES 2 SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 1154 CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 20, 2016 HAND-OUTS 1. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 8 2. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 3. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 +.% i 2016 BOARD OF f]tliF.f t'0RS SbA PRESIDENT Bruce Maize desert valleys builders association Diseovery Builders 1" f 7L'F_ PREZSIDRYT_ Fred Be] I Nobell Fnergy Solutions ? d VECr PRESIDENT SE, CRETAR)I'IREILSURER December 15, 2016 Eileen Eske Pacific Premier Bank City of La Quinta NICE PRE.SID-rAll Karla Campos, Finance Director OFAssOCI;ITF.S 78-495 Calle Tampico Allan Levin Allan Levin & Associates La Quinta, CA 92253 PAST PRESIDENT Dear Ms. Campos, Joseph Hayes First Bank Thank you for providing the Desert Valleys Builders Association (DVBA) the CHIEF E.l'ECU`I'll'L UFFICL•'1, additional information clarifying the disparity in the Ending to Beginning fund Gretchen Gutierrez balances, as requested in our December Th letter. DIRECTORS Additionally, thank you for sharing the list of facility improvements supported with Brian Benedetti Brian Benedetti Construction the Quimby Fund. Such expenditures for replacement, repairs, and other ,Mark Benedetti improvements are not allowed pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act. However, it BMC Select Build appears that the Quimby Act will allow such uses: Government Code Section Tom DuBosc 66447.(a)(3)(A). (r Development Design & Engineering !� J! Ivtarearet Drury Margaret Drury Construction The Desert Valleys Builders Association is satisfied that the City of La Quinta has Mario Gonzales met its annual reporting obligations. GHA Companies Mark Gran Res ectfuIly Strictly Business Consultinl- Tudd Hooks Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indi6Chief �. Dave Lippert Gttti JUL �! Lippert Construction, Inc ecyrtiv Officer Paul Mahoney l Advertising �PNIA Dehorah Nicciarrey The Gas Company Dan Olivier Nethery Mueller Olin ier Alan Pace Petra Geotechnieal John Powell. Jr. p Coachella Valley Water 11istr let Phil Smilh Sunrise Company Patrick Sivarthout Habitat for humanity Jeff Wattenbarger W.attenbarQer Construction 75100 Mediterranean * Palm Desert • CA 92211 (760) 776-7001 office * (760) 776-7002 fax www.thedvba.org REVISED ATTACHMENT #7 To Public Hearing Item No. 1 December 20, 2016 Council Agenda Received 12/19/2016 From City Attorney Ihrke CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL 2016-0004 SRR SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 Appeal Condition of Approval CC-1 A. City Council Authority. This condition to modify the original decision of the Planning Commission for Site Development Permit 2016-0005 is binding on the City pursuant to its police power and applicant pursuant to Section 9.200.120(D)(6) of the La Quinta Municipal Code and shall take effect immediately upon its adoption as part of the Appeal of Planning Commission Decision, Case No. Appeal 2016-0004 (Administrative Appeal). This condition is incorporated into the approval for Site Development Permit 2016-005 by this reference, and all other conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission for Site Development Permit 2016-0005 remain in full force and effect. B. Intent. The intent of this condition is to protect Peninsular Big Horn Sheep -from impacts related to the approximately 525 acres of property known as The SilverRock Resort pursuant to the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Communities Conservation Plan (MSHCP), the Mitigation Monitoring Program included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Addendum for the SilverRock Resort Specific Plan (SRR Mitigation Measures), that certain Development Agreement dated November 19, 2014, by and between the SilverRock Development Company, LLC (Developer) and the City (the DA), and that certain Purchase, Sale, and Development Agreement dated November 19, 2014, by and between Developer and the City (the PSDA). C. Immediate Construction of Temporary Fencing. Within 15 days after the decision of the hearing of the Administrative Appeal, the City shall solicit bids for the construction of temporary fencing., and within 45 days of the bid solicitation, award a contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Within 21 days after the award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, construction of the temporary fencing shall commence. The completion of construction for the temporary fencing shall be as soon as possible after commencing construction, not to exceed a period of 30 days for total construction. Prior to the issuance of any grading, demolition, construction, or building permit, the construction of the temporary fencing shall be completed. For purposes of this condition, "temporary fencing" or "temporary fence" means an 8-foot high fence between the SilverRock Resort development and hillside as identified in the SilverRock Resort Fence Location Site Plan attached as Exhibit "A" to this condition and incorporated by reference (Fencing Site Plan). The temporary fencing shall have gaps that should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less, and shall not contain gaps in which Big Horn Sheep can be entangled. If and/or when the City transfers or disposes of any of the SilverRock Resort property adjacent to the hillside to the applicant, the City shall reserve an easement, and the applicant shall grant an easement, sufficient 698/015610-0065 10413596 1 a12/19/16 for the construction and maintenance of the temporary fencing until such time as the permanent fencing or functional equivalent (as described below) is completed. The temporary fencing on City -owned property at SilverRock Resort shall be maintained by the City and on Developer -owned property shall be maintained by Developer until such time as the permanent fencing or functional equivalent is completed. D. Construction of Permanent Fencing or Functional Equivalent. Prior to the issuance of a "grand opening" of the SilverRock Resort as improved pursuant to the DA and PSDA, construction of the permanent fencing or functional equivalent shall be completed. For purposes of this condition, "permanent fencing or functional equivalent" or "permanent fence" means an 8-foot high fence or other barrier that prevents Big Horn Sheep from accessing SilverRock Resort, constructed of durable material or natural landscaping elements approved by t-heU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and Coachella Valley Conservation Commission. City and applicant in a location that, upon completion of construction, will be within 1-10 feet of the temporary fence line as identified on the Fencing Site Plan,, un_ less all_ approving__parties a ree to an alternative alignment. The permanent fence shall have gaps that should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less, and shall not contain gaps in which Big Horn Sheep can be entangled. If and/or when the City transfers or disposes of any of the SilverRock Resort property adjacent to the hillside to the applicant, the City shall reserve an easement, and the applicant shall grant an easement, sufficient for occess-tean"f necessery, construction of -and maintenance of) the permanent fence. The permanent fence on City -owned property at SilverRock Resort shall be maintained by the City and on Developer -owned property shall be maintained by Developer. For purposes of this condition, "grand opening" of the SilverRock Resort means the opening to the general public of the new resort improvements consisting of the Luxury Hotel, Lifestyle Hotel, Conference and Shared Service Facility, Resort Residential Village, and dwelling unit that are part of the Luxury Branded Residential Development, Lifestyle Branded Residential Development, Promenade Mixed -Use Development, or Resort Residential Village (all as those terms are defined in the PSDA). The anticipated date of the grand opening for reference purposes only is May 2019. E. Periodic Review for Environmental_ Impacts. After the completion of construction of the temporary fencing and until the completion of construction of the permanent fence, the City and applicant shall coordinate with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and/or Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (collectively, the other governmental agencies) to review the effectiveness of the temporary fencing o-r-and final design of the permanent fencing (Or fi IYfO/1RGI csrSi.Gur... If the review indicates that .fence modifications such as additional height or reinforcement, are required to protect_ bighorn sheep, the modifications shall be implemented. If review of environmental impacts advocates for a relocation of the temporary fencing or permanent fencing (or use of some type of functional equivalent) to protect Big HDmBighorn Sheep, thet-preview--amd4el-ocatiG--the alternative location or method of protecting Bighonsheep may be considered and -2- I��o�lty go-J, oft a1 w&a*u,� O December 20,2016 City of La Quinta City Mayor Linda Evans City Council members William Cain 52485 Avenida Rubio La Quinta,Ca. 92253 -In 2003 (13 years ago) I was one of the artist that painted one of the Bighorn Sheep models as a fund raising event for the Big Horn Institute to bring awareness of the plight of an endangered species. I received a book of all the artist paintings and most importantly a certificate of adoption for a lamb named Abbe. •As an aside please look at Abbe's nose and tell me that it doesn't look like a heart. •1 followed with interest and disgust the City of Rancho Mirage's reticence and procrastination to build a fence to protect the Bighorn sheep from coming down into urban areas. and dying. The city finally did the right thing and all those people who were moaning and groaning against spending money on the fence or that it would ruin their views are now quite content. -Reading the Desert Sun articles this summer about the Bighorn sheep dying in La Quinta and the stubbornness of La Quinta city council to address the issue, but rather to procrastinate and renege on previous commitments not only sadden me ,but made me wonder if the mayor or city council had a conscience or a heart... its not as if this issue just popped up on the radar. • It occurred to me that my adopted Iamb might have been one of the sheep that died this year so I made up a flyer "Stop Killing the Bighorn Sheep" and passed it around to the public. At least 80% of the people I talked to or gave the flyer to were in favor of protecting the Bighorn Sheep ... yes heard some of the same arguments that were brought forward in Rancho Mirage but the question is this ....Does the City of La Quinta want their legacy to be "Well we put up the Silverrock hotels but in the process we helped diminish an endangered species. -My advise is stop trying to avoid the issue and do the right thing your kids and grandkids will be grateful. DIVE I AND SUII.L BIGHOI DP KILL ;t asBn {47,1 %N Adopt a Bighorn 4 c �Ast -� Bighorn Institute P.O. Box 262 Palm Desert, California 92261 Telephone: 760-346-7334 Fax: 760-340-3987 � t EMail-BI@Bighominstitute.org WEB SITE www.Bighornlnstitute.org This is to certify that have given a gift adoption to of an endangered Peninsular Bighorn Lamb named )We Kimberly, a two year old ewe, gave birth to Abbe on April 10, 2003 at Bighorn institute's captive breeding facilities. Abbe weighed in at 7 pounds 4 oz. She is healthy, frisky and will be released as a yearling into the Santa Rosa or San Jacinto Mountains in the Spring of 2004. orge, Aj Bighorn Institute a nonprofit tax-exempt organization UMBER OF OCCUPANTS..PER ENTAL PROPERTIES The City of La Quinta asksqw_ NUMBER OF TOTAL *OVERNIGHT " T43TAL DAYTIME aCCUPANTS for your u(l cooperation:BEDROOMS s , OCCUPANTS J.INCLUDING OVERNIGHT OCCUPANTS) %/. mow, 0-STUDIO 2 8 Renters -are advised that all rules will be strictly iY enforced � Failure to comply may result in a citation, fines, and/or expulsion from the rented y roperty. C! ty i Bid -'.- haue the right to call a short-term vacation �1 rental .hotline to report violations.of the rules ou line in this brochure. r - GPM fr!,,. DE.SGRI. - F7 1 4 8 o 3 8 12 4 10 16 5 12 18 6 14 20 7 14 20 *OVERNIGHT (10:01 PM-6:59 AM) **DAYTIME (7:00 AM-10:00 PM) NOISE: Please keep any music to an appropriate level. Remember you are renting in a residential neighborhood. The surrounding neighbors have access to a 24/7 hotline ((760)833-9050) that they may call to file a complaint. The homeowner or an ap- pointed agent will be expected to respond to any complaint within 45 minutes or the La Quinta Police Department will be called. TRASH: Rental properties should be kept clean with no visible trash, Please keep all trash containers out of street view. PARKING:. Onsite parking is limited to approved carports, garages, and driveways. Renter's vehicles should not block a neighbor's driveway. Additional vehicles should be parked directly in front of the rental property, Keep in mind you are renting in a neighborhood. Friday chtt[ arftl OM& WHAT: Republic Records party EXPECT: Before you head to the polo fields for the main event, head to a day party hosted by Republic Records. The record label is throwing down all three days and will host appearances and performances by Marc E. Bassy, James Bay, Dagny, DNCE, Prince Fox, Of Monsters and Men, POWERS, Stanaj, Hudson Thames and Andrew Watt. Booze comes courtesy of Jagermeister and chef Chris Santos will be cooking lunch. WHERE: Private Estate, La Quinta CA WHEN: Friday, April 15th from noon-4pm RSVP: Invite Only ODDS YOU'LL BE ABLE TO SNEAK IN: 50-50 Like PAPER on Facebook - 174K X 4/17/2016 Republic Records Private Estate at Coachella I Citi® Private Pass k3'vllt !.`5 FAC ;; Cit.i -'m S.coIi : Gontac, {.., Citlbao' Hcwile Ariusic 53poiis Ditting & ,`°Ao e C omiPIisi10rmt ry :AF;,e5S foCiti, C ardwenibBi A 1Ht l Connect: In 0 Z .�.� Event, City, State, Category, Type j Rep:mblic Records Private Estate at Coachella ' < republic Coachella 201 Republic Records Private Estate at Coachella Access: 3-Day VIP Access Location: La Quinta, CA Date: April 15-17 1 12PM-4PM Daily Price: $50 per ticket Passcode: First 6 digits of your CitiO credit or debit card Citi cardmembers have special access to see James Bay, Of Monsters and Men, ONCE, Post Malone, Prince Fox, Powers, and more hanging out and performing poolside while enjoying food from celebrity chef Chris Santos and craft cocktails, plus additional surprise guests. This event is SOLD OUT. To add your name to the wait list: Call 800-301-3327 Very Limited Availability. Must be 21 years of age or older to attend. Tickets are strictly non -transferable. Privacy Terms & Conditions Citi.com You must use a Citi credit card which displays the Visa, MasterCard orAmedcan Express logo ora Citibank Debit Card which displays the MasterCard logo to take advantage of any ticket offer. Tickets are subject to availability and ticket orders may be subject to a service charge. Ticket limit per account and age requirements vary by event. By responding to an offer you will be disclosing all the information requested to a company outside the Ciligroup family of companies. Citi is not responsible for products or services offered by other companies. © 2016, Citibank, N,A_ Citi, Citi with Arc Design and Private Pass are registered service marks of Cifigroup Inc. hops://www.ci ti privatepass.com/landing/republic_records_private_estate_at_coachel la.htm I 1 /1 4/16/2016 UP sf O�iV , \�� 44.. ♦ YYY\ Y Dupont Estate Resort Home V) A enities amenities html) Photos OF Private Putting Green private-putting-green.html) more Pvwxk� V-A&VC9Z�, M ti1 c� This luxurious and private 8-10 bedrooi La Quinta, the Beverly Hills =-ZS4�L �O N\10 I minutes —away rf om shopping and exclt features a five hole putting green. Nestled against the Santa Rosa Mouni 4 of succulents, flowers, bamboo and de as picturesque as a Van Gogh paintinc This dynamic oasis is diverse in its va forentertaining family and friends. The property is available for large parties, wedding,, inquire for pricing on all c;ventsr The Resorts' Main House has a modem/asian fusion decor which hosts 5 bedrooms, baths, to include a full kitchen, living room, and a Brunswick Poker table. Flat screer -� �� *The Spa House located next to the over sized swimming pool and jacuzzi provides rE area, 2 whirlpools baths, sauna, and it's very own bar. Upon entertaining the main home, a white baby grand piano can be set to echo electr elaborate one level open floor plan. The large but cozy Lanai outside the huge living r grounds. The alluring Living Room features a massive hand crafted stoned fireplace, capped b seating areas for your comfort and pleasure. The Dining Room is not only tasteful, but also functional. Whether you're planning to family, it will fulfill all of your entertaining needs ... to include a pass through granite cc The fully equipped Gourmet Kitchen proudly exhibits a Miele coffee/espresso/cappuc purification system... just to mention a few of the dream amenities in this one of a kind setting. http://www.dupontestateresort.com/ 1/2 4/17/2016 Coachella 2016 Parties: Your Guide to the Biggest Events Celebuzz Though this year's Coachella lineup boasts big names like Calvin Harris (http://celebuzz.com/news/calvin-harris) and a Guns N' Roses (http://celebuzz.com/news/guns-n-roses) reunion, your best bet for a star sighting will be at one of the many parties popping up around the festival grounds. In the past, celebrity music lovers from Leonardo DiCaprio (http://celebuzz.com/news/leonardo-dicaprio) to Katy Perry (http://celebuzz.com/news/katy-perry) have been seen hanging out at one of these places to get away from the crowd. Though certain events are limited to VIPs only, there are still plenty of bashes open to the public. (Just look for the RSVP links below!) So, where can you expect to see Kendall (http://celebuzz.com/news/kendall- jenner) and Kylie Jenner (http://celebuzz.com/news/kylie-jenner) snapping selfies by the pool? Where might Gigi Hadid (http://celebuzz.com/news/gigi- hadid) pop up this year? Here's your guide to all the happenings around Coachella on Weekend One. [Note: All events are not affiliated or associated with the Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival. This post will be constantly be updated. Events are roughly sorted by time and date.] Republic Records Party What: Outside of Indio, the best place to catch your favorite bands will be at this over 21 event. Spanning the full Coachella weekend, the mid -day musical madness boasts special performances along with lunch provided by chef Chris Santos and craft cocktails by Jagermeister. When: Friday to Sunday, 12-4 p.m. Who: DNCE (http://celebuzz.com/news/dnce), James Bay (hops://en.wiMpedia.org/wild/James_Bay_(singer)), Of Monsters and Men (https://en.wikipedia.org/wild/Of Monsters —and —Men) and more have been slated to hit the stage. Where: Private estate in La Quinta. i OAK and Up&Down Party What: Celebrity hotspots 1 OAK and Up&Down are teaming up to bring the dance party to the desert, hosting an exclusive pop-up just outside the Coachella festival grounds. Australian brand nANA jUDY will be gifting high fashion swag to VIPs. When: Friday Where: Bermuda Dunes hftp://www.celebuzz.com/featuredlcoachella-2016-parties-events-guide-weekend-one/ 2/13 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS MACCO CORPORATION, &,corporation, comer of that certain real property situated in the State of California, County of Riverside, described as follows: Lots 1 to 76. both inclusive , of Tract No. 2117 , as boom oa ap rrcvr�"dr is -laaok 4F , page API �' ZY.23 - - - , Niecneous Naps, records of Riverside County, California, s hereby covenants,=egress and declares that all of said lots and property are and will be held, sold and conveyed subject to the following covenants, conditions and restrictions, which are hereby declared to be for the benefit of the whole tract sad all of the property described herein, and the owners thereof, their successors and assigns. Said restrictions establish and impose a general plan for the improvement and development of said tract and all of the property described herein sod the adoption and establishment of covenants and restrictions upon "id land and each and every lot and portion thereof and upon the use, occupancy and omjoyment thereof. Evary conveyance of any of said lot or lots or property or portion thereof in said tract of lad shall be and is subject to the said covenants, conditions mad rastrictions,aa follows: 1. The words "tract" and "Subdivision" as used herein shall include all of the lead described herein. 2. All lots in the tract shall,.be kdown and described as residential lots and shall be used for so other purpose. ]. No building shall be located on any lot nearer to the front lot -line or nearer to rho side street line than the mioiaum building setback lines of the Cowaty of Riverside. In any event no building shall be located on any lot nearer than ten feet to the front lot line, or tea feet to the side street line. No building shall be located nearer than five feet to .any interior lot line or tack feet to any roar lot line. 4. No residential structure shall be erected or.placed on any building plot, which plot has a width of loss than fifty feet at the front building setback line. 1 5.1 No noxious or offensive trade or activity shall be carried on upon any lot nor shall ■mytbing be done thar■om which my be or become an annoyance or nuisance ' to the neighborhood: r `\ 6& No trailsr,=baseaant, tent, shack, garage, barn, or other outbuilding erected im the tract shall at any time -be used as a, residence, temporarily or permanently, nor &ball any structure of a temporary character be used as a residence. 7. No dwelling shall be erected on any lot in the tract unless it has at least one thousad square feat of actual living spat■, excluding porches and steps. 8. Ito feace or hedge exceeding three feet in height shall be erected or permitted between street and front setback line. 9. There &hall be no poultry, rabbits, cows, sheep, hose or any other stook or animals raised in said tract except that the owusrs of lots may have ordinary housshold�pots. No such pots shall be raised or kept for business or commercial use, but only is pots in the ordinary and:ususl menner. 16, .Architectural Control. No building shall be erected, placed, or altered on any lot until the construction plane and specifications and a plan showing the location. of the structure have been approved by the architectural committee an to quality of workmanship and materials, 1Mrmony of external domign.with existing structures, and.as-to location with respect to topography and finish grade elevation. No fence or.uall she11 be erected, placed or altered be any lot. nearer to any street than the minimum building. setback Ilae unless similarly approved. Approval shall be as provided in paragraph 11. 1 I Order: OuickView Page 1 of 2 Doc: 1960-79941 REC ALL Requested By: Printed: 12/16/2016 3:45 PM It. k4labership. The architectural cantrol COmm£ttae is composed of 3, John W. Klug, Callum MacLeod and Edvard A. pallagrin, whose business address is 3800 E. Cosat Highway, Corona del Mar,Californta. A majority of: the corwmittas may desig— nste a repremantat£va to act for it, In the event of death or resignation of any member of the committee, therrmsining memhera shAil have full Authority to desig- nate a successor. lfafther the maah@r$ of the committee, nor its designated rsprasentative shall be entitled to .ny cempen@attan for service, p%rforxd pursuant to thin covenant. At any tlme, the then record owners of a majority of the lots shall hive the power through it duly recorded written instrument to change the membership of the committee or to withdraw from the committsa or rastore to it any of its powers and duties. 12. procedure. The committee's approval or disapproval an required in theso cove-- nAnt■ shall be in writing. In the avant the committee or its designated representa- tive, fails to approve or disapprove within 30 days after plans sod specifications have been ■ubmitted to it, or in any event, if no suit to enjoin the construction has bean town aced prior to the completion thereof, approval will not he required and the related covenants shall be deesrad to have bean fully compiled with. The povar■ and duties of such committee, and of its designated raprasentative,ahall cease on sod after January let, 1969. Thereafter, the approval described in this covenant shall not be required unless, prior to said date and effective thereon, a written instrument shall be saecutad by the then record owners of a majority of the lots and duly recorded appointing A repressatstiva, or representatives, who shall thereafter exercise Cho same powers previously exercised by said committee. 13. No derrick or other structure designed for use in boring, mining, or quarrying for water, oil or natural gas or precious minerals shall ever be erected, maintained or permitted upon any lot in said Tract. These covenants are to run with the land and ahaall be binding on all parties And all parsons claiming under them until Juno 1, 198" at which time said covenants shall be AutomaticAlly extalydad for successive periods for 10 years unless by vote of a majority of the then owners of, the lot% it in agreed to change said covenants in f whole or in part. If tlka partida hersro, or any of them, or chair heirs or assigns shall violate or attempt to violate any of the covenant$ herein, it shall 11e lawful for any othr.r person or parsons ovnlag soy real property situated in said development or subdivi- sice to prosecute any proceedings at law or,in equity agslaat the person or persons violating or attempting to violate any such covenant and either to prevent him or them from me doing or to recover damages or other dues for such violation. Invalidation of any one of these covenants by Judgment or court order shall in no visa affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. A breach of any of the Covenants, conditions or re,trictiono shall not defeat or render invalid the lion of any mortgage or dead of trust made in good faith and for value. on said lots or property or any portion thereof, but maid cuversantm, conditions and restrictions shall he binding upon sod effective Against any owner of said land whoa@ title is acq%iired by the foreclosure of Any lion or mortgadr thereon or Male under any deed of tt,ust given to secure the payment of rsnnsy. MCCO COQUMATI04. a eorp ration � / r John Klug, Aut� hoz lg*d Agent j t P 0 way cc V O co nA F.a %`.-. P --- ,--- Order: QuickView Page 2 of 2 Requested By: , Printed: 12/16/2016 3:45 PM Doc: 1960-79941 REC ALL i 4-4 e POWER POINTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 20,2016 City Council Meeting December 20,2016 17, r -� GEM of the DESER'. City Council Meeting December 20, 2016 PH 1— Appeal of SilverRock Resort and Residences ..W �rAr 17, .wrW r -� GEM of the DESER'. r .jl SilverRock Resort History • 2002- Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) adopted • 2006- SilverRock Specific Plan and MND Addendum • 2014- Development Agreement and MND Addendum • 2016- Master site design and golf course realignment Environmental Review • EA 2014-1003 — reviewed Silverrock Development Master Plan and adopted Specific Plan — Includes mitigation measures to protect peninsular bighorn sheep Site Development Permit • 140 room luxury hotel and spa • 29 luxury -branded residences • Meeting and conference center with shared service facility • Outdoor activity areas including three swimming pools EXISTING ENTRY ROAD, NOT PART OF SUBMITAL 1\ \ MC - MEETING CENTER CC- CONFERENCE CENTER \ \ SS - SHAREO SERVICES UUILUING Appeal • October 25, 2016 - Planning Commission approved Site Development Permit (SDP) 2016-0005 including restatement of PBS Fence requirement • Sierra Club and Center for Bio Diversity (Appellant) appealed the Planning Commission SDP approval Response to Appeal • Construction of Planning Areas 2, 3, 4 of SDP has not occurred and is subject to condition 54 for fence construction • Condition CC-1 causes immediate bidding, bid award, and construction consistent with applicable mitigation measures N 41 wpm -I",- I LUXURY "A DED 81ffi1139a�•1fL51. FA.Z, LLPLURY LUJiYL 1r Pr1R>E7hY, PA SFF.hPtF9i5F.Ri+PCF3 PA 5 J tn: � kDsrl'rI ,: FIOI-F.l. PA LOA PAfl4 �1 rg yr r [' MYd].t111FCOL d'L•TLa�L,•L+1LF C VA m 4 yl ter5i.+u'V£fYUELU UdIE LIiF 'L&BR.i`re'DC6 4�\ IPAR t. 5 f IAt. P.A 11 `� �til 'S tip+• _ -+_- .... .4,�4_ PAW Y' 3� I N:L4LC� r� L'��i.'';0 I� a i44�� lL spy'' � il.wouM, •�I : i �• I Sri 1 r °°-. ty4s. p�]Lr}"'e+µ\.�{], 1 17• I L t'sdN[ I _ P wrn LL _ FA 2 LLXURT L1L41- L YA7 1 ' PROM,.dC1E& MrKEL}L'4E}•ILLAcz p r O I •.I :v I iNIFrlwl Y.lh(iPigRY %TMAi-P t 96i CEt�G±G IKW . Pr N',Mm1.HW' Us ww ;. �- � � �•+r'+� - I ilfrlieW,W4�A�+f11h1 ILd iR R�J'4�R.�� qq FW wJV EkM'K18fClPr JL'�4' 7! 1RLL�AGE ��; t _l•,,�+ I �� r Lr SC P NC1Til vo ml I' uTrs+1-ir Art�3$aT 'IW6 r<�o a�- F Ppw�a,yp5rary®{.tiGtly t4; wiL41 I(rF 19� A JI - P woa-mnoiaarre ➢ VII I.iLA .�1 IN 1•F' �4J IH.C'NA4WWNYriL6N:l Afiht U� ei` tuf ,a n�w�r.Itifixvmisntsar4xnli �e ae :`% C {��I wl: �...r ��• `. .a nu�oknv wlansoru qua ! 1 j� r � �- e. r m•=.cnral.srsscrsa 1 i _ - A� 1116 Iv.nur n5 _ - Tf.IIAL asr A. Jr _ -" IUII HL,nt:LL FII}UI4:1' F:4'4{kL'tiPlItilw:- vr i 9rAPARCI.,,- r - _4Jr'w Joe M.� ` 00 jr- W -a tTC[ LF UF.cE � P.E EF1"E IL[RLI� I. P P EL- i. .r f ` .!o I s ¢� Aid P• .�% .;a I qILF LC a1"ic f' X 7h tkND USE RIN1\i\F] -\'E" E IFS- i 1. i \ i a 9m.nY �.'Hon¢.T J5 ��.u�A+.,o..wsFmxE r.�am �aeanu nhw®rs�vmti oasentei m�an��usehw+ca-.fin us un w RE:CRi FE�II � \ ILL.�GE- - 9 K�4N°l MAPD� VIL�'�V. Ohl �Atl b h m.+Lau:tinsn�a i�o s � YGCLF CLIB,LHU E ' Pi 6 IL[FE,7TILE BF -A\ DED F,.E IDES-ML PE\IL,:P\IE\T RK E . R. ..E PA 11 PUBLIC. P-O k P.fi� ItiC\�s � P TE�ZjL t� FLITS IP -F 1E .j t1 F . FEE EFh EFLIELIC: yLFE F.-. y Pill\R- B yf, j r--, TE�rr'\ti FLCfIIFE tF- ,, LF UP -E EEEFJ F; "` r -� Planning Area 2 zi,«m. _ YmWDo ble Queen Guest Roams (4 pu building) - r H TE'_ C- 1 lp4. r i .,`\FER.E\.E D=H.-.F:ED jr I TE\7 TC! LIFE T E H-'T .r LF CiR =E ± I RE EF\E L[ELI: LIiE�� / _ P��FiTI�;V OF P� I •_ }'LIEAL DE\ L,{\DED FT�IDE\-11iL.DE\FJ.��P\fE\-f PK �Fs F_.'sE RX11 'F -.FF I \ PLIRLIC PARE: - TM ��{etii --I-- --- -I'At F.r, -may, L r:�rcic` ~ i unatlo-a .°��roma€soE-na — —rr"-0-f' oe.a_,e.��- RE�.CRT F E 1DEV'T]_',L., �sEsxiu etlw�aEsaerrrx.oaanenm.:r n w `h % ILL ',GE "+a"•h PA�YAE �E Wf�fD� p�.tiRE�tl tl0 W b8 X`T£ZlLL'N G[iP IK1�CH5 cLtF 3 ��•� ranu:.cc.ti a. �EE6 ca +j�ql LL 6 .� P-\ 1013 PC' TE1Tl{L FLITLIRE � Pl{ELI�. LI-E PAR ELF Planning Area 3 for Mrntln,tain Views Neighborhood Entry E. I F E G, LF CLUBH': CI-E P� G UFET]LE PR.i\DED RE�IDE\-H{L ETE\-EL:P1E\-f F_�T6,E '.E PA ll EFFL, '\ PUBLIC PARK E ramp g� F ----Fi [TLIrE i,'LF F LIE F_E EF E PLIE_[, All .1. II EP-\F._EL- E 9 AQ T IL r dp G-lFCi IIB SE,F-\bZL Y. 5 t6H[[LEIKI6. St.0.E93AYF aaR, ' s RE -''E _ I. a �asn�¢R :>cmAE-srtu ona r.¢•-r as w \7LL ,I r —0.—l�.rf.-.aewe IOB 10!€"Ml fl+' �16lEAai2 � �� 4 /1 P� It}P txwc ..mrzr 'sa :• p�� - - \ML FEF I E ram, Planning Area 4 Cont—C—t,, small M4 t[ng Room En"Road PmFu hmAm Shared Sers7m D11- `�� 1i-1 Outdoor Pre-F—cYson Ciri1L %-dAma f. Ballrooms k- iV4.YY �. P(sN _ FMI1Ev.. �R 1 V.P; b AMM. Figure 1-. Lool-mig north fican the CcacheII3 Canal. C' TQVD sheep =Iumau fence on left- SilverRo& golf eoursse on iight ZI Figure 2: Loaking iLcwffi 3,.IDnE CVWD sheep exc4 "noDEL fenck.- CoacbLella Canal on iaght- PliDject staff shcvm for scale. Slide 17 TR]1 Temporary fence example. Tim Jonasson, 12/16/2016 Slide 18 TR]2 Permanent fence example. Tim Jonasson, 12/16/2016 N 41 wpm -I",- City Council Meeting December 20, 2016 PH2 -Special Events 17, r -� GEM of the DESER'. i .jl December 6th Study Session • Research other regulations • Allow greater flexibility • Director discretion for application deadlines • Penalties - Code Enforcement Nonresidential Special Events — No Change Individual Events LmJn-going Events Permit Permit Threshold Fees Noticing Requirements Noise Parking Plan Required? Insurance Req. Governing Code Section Public Hearing Deadline to Apply Number of event restrictions per year Number of day restrictions per event Residential Special Events Current Standard • Minor Use Permit per event with 50 people • 2 events per year • 10 consecutive days per event Proposed Residential Standard Permit Threshold • Residence rented with or without compensation with a combination of event characteristics (outdoor amplified music, staging, event lighting, tents, additional parking accommodations, etc.) • Exceeding occupancy for short-term vacation rental Proposed Residential Standard Permit Types • Minor TUP for 1-3 events • Major TUP for 4-11 events • Conditional Use Permit (CUP)- more than 12 events • 3 days per event maximum Review Periods • 45 days or less for minor TUP — ABC license — Traffic/Parking Plans — Tents, stages and amplified music • 90 days for major TUP &CUP — Police Department review — Appeals by public — Call up by PC or CC Penalties • Second violation: suspension of permit application for 90 days • Third violation: cause for automatic revocation of TUP, MUP, or CUP Penalties- Short Term Vacation Rental • City may deny, suspend, or revoke a short term vacation rental permit N 41 wpm -I",- 'GIZINr1■ATLaAI&we]a Iore INLY0 Dance Permit also required for any special event including a dance floor and Cathedral City No 60 days requires finger printing with Dept. of Justice. Events with over 100 attendees also require Completed Riverside County Planning Coachella Yes 4 weeks Department Event documents w/approved Signatures Indian Wells Yes 130 days Written HOA approval: No Public Hearing required for Event Permit Application. No special events allowed near venue during festival weekends. Indio Yes J45 days All applications reviewed by SEPT team (special events planning team). Gatherings of 50 or more La Quinta Yes No Deadline 2 Max. Events in Residential District, 4 Max. Events in Nonresidential District Time Based on Event Size Targeted to Commercial Districts Palm Desert Yes (no specific timeframe) Requires additional Temporary Entertainment Permit application Event House: 30 days No amplified sound allowed outdoors. Palm Springs Yes Special Event: 6 months Must notify neighbors. Permit Threshold: Amplified sound, stage, lighting, parking issues, 1Ox10 tent. Rancho Mirage Yes 30 days Must notify neighbors. a N 41 wpm -I",- n i City Council Meeting December 20, 2016 PH3- Village Build -Out Plan EIR r -� GEM of the DESER' a�7; a.. i N 0 tv Ahm MtAh BLiwasm9mm ATTACHMENT 1 j - pL'ENlOA TWVNGA I ON w w r .Z gVENIO/ WiR.9MJ.4 tr. - eLUE sxr 3 z s r— I , ol Legend 9� y Ywy La Qumta Village Build-0Ld e.I 7 Project Boundary I " _ General Plan —Icy O'®9ybry _ .�u FFr.<oo-cnu p✓+rutin- —i W - Designations w CG General Commercial LDR Low Density Residential j� ro�,euEsraw MC Major Community cnci�a , AVENUE sz Facilities —. i .avenvss MHDR MedlunVH!gh Density Residential OS -Open Space - Recreation eation -- �CALIE.srnaiaa - - Right -of -Way w ` — — VC Village Commercial Sower: uy or � a��ma pis Gea 1 Phm Lead U- D—gu b— Exhibit L. Quinta Village Budd—t Plan EnalronmLntal impart Report 1 3-5 Existing Land Use I Dwelling Units I Square Feet I Acres Residential Single Family Multi -Family Commercial Commercial Other Land Uses Hotels + Casitas Civic Center School Park Vacant Total Build Out Assumptions 1. Isolated small lots of 1/2 acre or less 2. Existing development remains in current condition 3. Vacant and under-utilized lots consolidated and redeveloped 4. Lower intensities at the core Build Out Assumptions 5. Greatest density/intensity on north side of Calle Tampico 6. Parking requirements reduced by 50% 7. Centralized parking structure(s) as parking demand increases nome Ing I *.ITn ra 90' Ground floor commercial and Existing: 3 du residential above Future: 399 du 50% res @20du/ac and 50% @25 du/ac Total: 402 du Ground floor commercial and 50% @20du/ac and 50% @25 du/ac Ground floor commercial and residential above 100% @25du/ac Ground floor commercial and residential above 100% @30 du/ac 2-story buildings Commercial only, no residential Existing: 23 du Future: 130 du Total: 153 du Existing: 6 du Future: 59 du Total: 65 du Existing: 251 du plus 290 hotel rooms Future: 613 du Total: 864 du Existing: 1 du Future: 0 du Total: 1 du Existing:284 du Future: 1,198 du Total: 1,482 du Existing: 22,825 Future: 302,531 Total: 343,356 Existing: 7,200 Future: 21,800 Total: 29,000 sq ft Existing: 11,000 Future: 45,410 Total: 56,410 Existing: 98,500 Future: 346,465 Total: 444,965 Existing: 12,400 Future: 92,580 Total: 104,980 Existing: 151,925 Future: 808,786 Total 960,711 Circulation • Pedestrian friendly • Mid -block cross- walks • Mini -roundabouts • Diagonal parking December 61h Study Session • City will analyze drainage improvements needed on Calle Tampico for future CIP project. • Utilities will be placed underground on case - by -case basis • Sidewalks will remain 6' wide on pedestrian corridors Zone Text Amendments • Encourage Mixed Use • Increase density: 30 units per acre north of Calle Tampico 25 units per acre south of Calle Tampico • Max height 45 feet. Increases between 45-60 feet allowed with Conditional Use Permit approval. • Permanent reduction in parking requirements with public parking incentives on private lands • Eliminate Village Design Guidelines • Allow unlimited extensions of SDP's in the Village Significant Environmental Impacts • Resolution prepared making Findings and incorporating a Statement of Overriding Considerations. • Council has considered Draft & Final EIR and all testimony in this case; • Council finds that the economic, social and other benefits of the project outweigh potentially significant impacts; • Adopts the Findings and certifies the Village Build - out Plan EIR. Summary • Ultimate build out driven by the market •Along-term plan • Long-term success tied to assembly of small lots into larger parcels • Plan provides maximum flexibility to encourage ground floor retail or office development and residential above • Existing development can remain N 41 wpm -I",-