1989 10 17 RDAd_ Z!LT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
78-105 Calle Estado
La Quinta, California 92253
Regular Meeting
October 17, 1989 7:30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER Beginning Res. No. 89-20
a. Roll Call
HEARINGS
BUSINESS SESSION
1. Consideration of Approval of Procedures and Criteria for
Evaluation of Proposals for Village Center Project and
Designation of Village Center Area.
a) Minute Order Action.
CONSENT ITEMS
1. Approval of Minutes of October 3, 1989.
ADJOURNMENT
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Saundra L. Juhola, Secretary of the La Quinta Redevelopment
Agency do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the
Redevelopment Agency Meeting of October 17, 1989 was posted on
the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-105 Calle Estado
and on the bulletin board at the La Quinta Post Office on
Friday, October 13, 1989.
October 13, 1989.
ZRAL. i(;;Zecre tary
La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
BIB]
12-15-1998-U01
09:07:22AM-U01
BASIC-U01
RDA-U02
10-U02
17-U02
1989-U02
d_ BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO.Z /
PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA
FOR EVALUATION OF SUBMITTALS
I. Background. The La Quinta Redevelopment Agency the
Agency") by Ordinance No. 43 established the La Quinta
Redevelopment Project the Redevelopment Project"). The Agency,
in connection with the Redevelopment Project, has adopted Rules
Governing Owner Participation and Business Re-Entry the
Participation Rules").
The La Quinta Redevelopment Agency desires to set forth
procedures and criteria for the eliciting and consideration of
proposals for participation by owners within certain portions of
the Project Area as may hereafter be designated from time to time
such area constituting a Limited Area1').
The Agency now desires to more fully set forth
procedures and criteria for the evaluation of submittals made by
owners and/or tenants interested in participating in some manner
in such Limited Area(s) as the Agency may hereafter designate from
time to time by Resolution.
II. Procedure. Upon receipt of requests for consideration
by owners or tenants from within a Limited Area with respect to
owner participation and/or re-entry of business within the Project
Area, the Agency will review such submittals.
a) Upon receipt of submittals, initial evaluations
shall be conducted by the Executive Director or Deputy Executive
Director) of the Agency. Each party making a submittal is
responsible for the completeness and accuracy of its submittals.
If requested by the Agency's Executive Director or Deputy),
submittals shall include a construction pro forma if applicable),
an operating pro forma, and a business plan. In the event the
Executive Director or Deputy) notifies a party making a submittal
that the submittal is incomplete or that additional information is
required, such party shall be allowed three 3) weeks to complete
its submittal. The failure to timely providesuch additional
information of the submittal, and consideration of such submittal
shall thereupon cease. Upon receipt of one or more submittals and
additional information as applicable, the Executive Director or
Deputy) will evaluate the submittal and make a determination with
respect to whether the submittal or submittals, as applicable)
conforms to the criteria set forth in paragraph C-i below. In the
event a party having made a submittal disagrees with conclusions
reached by the Executive Director, such party may appeal such
decision to the governing board of the Agency by making written
request therefore within ten 10) days after the Executive
Director or Deputy) transmits notice of the initial evaluation.
The review of such submittal(s) by the Agency shall be de novo.
I
BIB]
12-15-1998-U01
09:07:22AM-U01
BASIC-U01
RDA-U02
10-U02
17-U02
1989-U02
d_ b) Any decision by the Executive Director or Deputy)
resolving a conflict between submittals may be appealed for de
novo review by the governing body of the Agency) by an affected
party by making written request therefore within ten lO)Zdays
after the Executive Director or Deputy) transmits notice of his
decision.
c) Criteria.
1. The following criteria shall be applied in
reviewing submittals:
a. Conformity of the submittal including
with respect to uses) with the
Redevelopment Plan and other applicable
enactments;
b. Feasibility of the proposal;
c. Successful development experience;
d. Financial capability;
e. Manufacturer or franchise approval if
applicable), including a) present
commitment of such approval, b) past
history of having obtained such approv-
al, or c) facts demonstrating a
reasonable probability that such
approval will be given; and
f. Experience in operating the use(s)
proposed.
The foregoing may be satisfied by the submitting party
itself, or by a partner or joint venturer; any such partner or
joint venturer must be identified at the time of submittal and
must approve/authorize its involvement in such proposed
partnership or joint venture.
2. In the event conflicting submittals are
received which satisfy the criteria set forth in paragraph Cl
above, the following criteria shall be applied to resolve such
conflict:
BIB]
12-15-1998-U01
09:07:22AM-U01
BASIC-U01
RDA-U02
10-U02
17-U02
1989-U02
d_ a. Which submittal best satisfies the
criteria set forth in paragraph Cl;
b. Sales tax generation reasonably
anticipated;
c. Employment generation;
d. Environmental benefits or lesser
degree of detrimental impact);
e. Degree to which assistance sought;
f. Degree of site control by party making
the submittal; and
g. Value of existing property land and
improvements) within the Limited Area
by the party making submittal.
III. Amendment. These Procedures and Criteria shall be
subject to review and amendment by the Agency from time to time
upon adoption of a resolution so providing.
BIB]
12-15-1998-U01
09:07:22AM-U01
BASIC-U01
RDA-U02
10-U02
17-U02
1989-U02
ing -> 10)B- NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
05-14-1999-U01
10:08:22AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDA-U02
10-U02
18-U02