Loading...
2001 04 03 CC Minutes LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 3, 2001 A regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at the hour of 2:00 p.m. by Mayor Pe~a. PRESENT: Council Members Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pe~a ABSENT: None PUBLIC COMMENT - None CLOSED SESSION 1. Conference with legal counsel - pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) - Conserve Our Village Environment, Kimberly Ann Bird V. City of La Quinta, Riverside County Superior Court Case No. 021658. (See Page 12 for additional closed session item.) Council recessed to Redevelopment Agency and to Closed Session to and until the hour of 3:00 p.m. 3:00 P.M. Mayor Pe~a led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT Lucia Moran, P.O. Box 1305, stated 52 participants are registered for this year's Soap Box Derby and that next year's event may need to be extended to two days. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Council Member Adolph requested Consent Item No. 5 be moved to Business Item No. 6. ANNOUNCEMENTS - None City Council Minutes 2 April 3, 2001 PRESENTATIONS - None WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE In response to Council Member Adolph, City Manager Genovese advised the correspondence from Country Club of the Desert is being handled by the Community Development Director. In the event his efforts do not yield the desired results the letter will be placed on the next Council agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION- It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to approve the City Council Minutes of March 20, 2001, as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED APRIL 3, 2001. 2. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE COMMUNITY PARK. (RESOLUTION NO. 2001-23) 3. APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH PURKISS-ROSE-RSI FOR COMMUNITY PARK DESIGN. 4. APPROVAL OF OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR ONE CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSIONER TO ATTEND THE JOINT CONGRESS OF ARTS IN SACRAMENTO, JUNE 7-8, 2001. 5. SEE BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 6. 6. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION OF A PAINTING BY CENTAVA. (RESOLUTION NO. 2001-24) 7. APPROVAL OF AWARD OF CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER, MILES AVENUE SOIL EXPORT, PROJECT NO. 2001-01. 8. APPROVAL OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION GRANT FOR RECYCLING PROGRAM. City Council Minutes 3 April 3, 2001 9. APPROVAL OF THE YEAR 2000 ANNUAL CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT FOR THE CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM. 10. APPROVAL OF OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING MANAGER TO ATTEND THE MILLENNIUM CONFERENCE TO BE HELD IN BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA, MAY 9-11, 2001. 11. APPROVAL OF OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PRINCIPAL PLANNER TO ATTEND THE 26TH ANNUAL CALIFORNIA PRESERVATION CONFERENCE TO BE HELD IN SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, MAY 17-20, 2001. 12. APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORY AND VALUATION SERVICES FOR CITY CONVERSION TO GASB ACCOUNTING STANDARDS. 13. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING A STREET CLOSURE PERMIT FOR THE ANNUAL GREATER COACHELLAVALLEY SOAP BOX DERBY TO BE HELD APRIL 14, 2001, ON AVENIDA BERMUDAS. (RESOLUTION NO. 2001-25) MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to approve the Consent Calendar as recommended and amended and with Item Nos. 2, 6, and 13 being approved by RESOLUTION NOS. 2001-23 through 25 respectively. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2001-37. BUSINESS SESSION Council concurred to take up Business Item No. 6 at this time. 6. APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT WITH HARRIS & ASSOCIATES TO PREPARE THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES (PS&E) FOR THE MONTERO ESTATES SOUND WALL, PROJECT NO. 2000-12. Public Works Director Vogt presented a brief staff report. Council Member Adolph commented on the design of the wall under construction across the street from Montero Estates and stated he hoped the Montero Estates sound wall has better aesthetics. He felt the design aspect should be as high a priority as the cost. City Manager Genovese advised the Montero Estates wall design will be brought back to Council for approval before a contract is awarded. In regards to the City Council Minutes 4 April 3, 2001 wall across the street, he stated staff is looking at a possible change order to add pilasters or other adjustments to improve the aesthetics of the wall. Council Member Perkins noted landscaping greatly improved the aesthetics of the wall along Washington Street near Highway 111. Council Member Henderson noted Council has previously directed staff to expedite the project and to design a wall with some deviations to provide variety. She did not feel a 12-foot-high wall would be acceptable to anyone. A brief discussion ensued regarding the importance of maintaining informal communication with the residents on this project. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to approve a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $70,998 with Harris & Associates to prepare Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate for the Montero Estates Sound Wall Improvements, Project No. 2000-12. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2001-38. 1. CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER NO. I TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001 OBELISK CONTRACT TO CHANGE THE STYLE AND MATERIAL OF THE LETTERING ON THE OBELISKS. Public Works Director Vogt presented the staff report. Council Member Sniff suggested a color contrast between the border and obelisk to emphasize the lettering. Council Member Perkins stated he didn't have a problem with the proposal. Council Member Adolph stated he's not totally enamored with the obelisks because most of them get lost at intersections with power poles, etc. but at least the reflective material will make them more functional. Mayor Pe~a voiced concern about losing consistency with the current obelisks. Mr. Vogt noted the current obelisks are entry monuments and the new obelisks will be for streets. Peter Urbon, P. O. Box 874, Rancho Mirage, confirmed the current obelisks can be retrofitted to match the new obelisks and he explained the purpose in the change. City Council Minutes 5 April 3, 2001 MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to approve an appropriation of $1,000 from the Arts in Public Places Fund (701-000-300-290) and approve Contract Change Order No. 1 to the Fiscal Year 2000/2001 Obelisk Contract in an amount not to exceed $4,378.50 to change the lettering style and material on each obelisk face. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2001-39. At the request of Community Services Director Horvitz, Council concurred to postpone Business Item No. 2 until later in the meeting. 3. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A SALE PRICE FOR THE "GAMBY" MARKETING ITEM. Management Analyst Wilson presented the staff report. In response to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Wilson stated shipping boxes can be obtained separately if Council wishes. In response to Council Member Adolph, Mr. Wilson advised the $7.50 price includes sales tax. He added an increase to staff cost is not anticipated. Council Member Henderson stated she didn't feel Council is ready at this time to determine how to inventory and sell the Gambys. However, she suggested the possibility of making them available through the Chamber of Commerce, Historical Society Museum, Senior Center, Friends of the La Quinta Senior Center, and La Quinta Arts Foundation. Council Member Perkins suggested leaving it up to staff where and how the Gambys are sold. Council Member Henderson suggested making them available at the Mainstreet Marketplace on Friday if received in time. In response to Mayor Pe6a, Mr. Wilson stated the shipment is expected by Friday. In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Wilson confirmed the City has paid sales tax on $5.81 and will need to pay additional sales tax on the difference between that and $7.50. City Council Minutes 6 April 3, 2001 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OI= LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SALES PRICE FOR "GAMBY" MARKETING ITEM. It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to adopt Resolution No. 2001-26 as submitted. Motion carried with Council Member Adolph voting NO. 4. CONSIDERATION OF NEW DESIGN FOR CITY VEHICLES. Management Analyst Casillas presented the staff report. Council Member Adolph stated he felt any of the designs were an improvement but preferred Concepts D and E. Council Member Sniff stated he could not support any of the designs and felt the logo is too small. Council Member Henderson voiced concern about Iogos in the valley looking alike and stated she felt they should have some distinction. She said the mountains and sun design reminds her of the Desert Resorts Regional Airport logo and the Cathedral City logo. She preferred using symbols already established to identify the City, such as the Gambrel Quail, instead of using flowers. She agreed the logo should be larger and felt it should be on the door. Council Member Perkins stated he liked Concepts E and B respectively and supported changing the entire fleet of City vehicles as opposed to a few at a time. Mayor Pe~a leaned toward Concept D with the color of the mountains changed to purple and the logo placed under "City of La Quinta" on the rear panel. He wished to see pictures of similar Iogos such as the airport and Cathedral City in order to come up with something different. Council Member Perkins suggested the colors in the City seal be used to be compatible. After a brief discussion, Council concurred to direct staff to come back with a refinement of Concept D with different colored mountains and a logo on the back panel. Council furLher directed staff to come back with other cities' Iogos for comparison. City Council Minutes 7 April 3, 2001 Council concurred to take up Business Item No. 2 at this time. 2. CONSIDERATION OF THE LA QUINTA COURT ART FEATURE AND ART PURCHASE AGREEMENT. Community Services Director Horvitz presented the staff report and noted "artist" in the last sentence on Page 16 of the staff report should be changed to "developer." In response to Council Member Adolph, Ms. Horvitz confirmed Council did discuss a Iow-level water spray feature but it was not included in the design because the developer is concerned about wind blowing the spray onto the sidewalk or windows. Council Member Adolph agreed and felt water spray on the sidewalks could be dangerous. Council Member Perkins stated he could not support the proposed design because the rippling water would not be visible from the intersection, which he noted is one of the most important corners in the City. Council Member Henderson stated she liked the proposal and noted the eight sections will be in varying heights with lighting that will make the rippling water more visible. Council Member Sniff stated he could not support the proposed water feature and felt a modification of the design suggested by Council Member Perkins at a prior Council meeting would be more noticeable and attractive. He liked the idea of a Iow-level, "lacy" water spray feature not exceeding 24 inches in height. Council Member Adolph agreed the rippling water would not be visible from the intersection and could not support the proposed water feature. He noted a rippling water effect is achieved through a series of stair steps. Mayor Pe~a suggested a variation of the proposed water feature with a cascading water effect. Rod Murphy, representing the developer, confirmed the water feature can be modified to accomplish the cascading water effect Council is looking for. City Council Minutes 8 April 3, 2001 Council Member Adolph noted the importance of the pump size to provide a sufficient volume of water. In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Murphy advised the water feature will have lighting with interchangeable colored lens. Council concurred to direct staff to work with the developer in modifying the water feature to provide a cascading water effect and to bring back a rendering of the modified water feature. 5. CONSIDERATION OF A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH DALE FRANK AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR DEVELOPER IMPACT FEE ELIGIBLE REIMBURSEMENT AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSISTANCE FOR OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO WASHINGTON STREET ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF LA QUINTA COURT. Public Works Director Vogt presented the staff report. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to authorize the City Manager to enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with Dale Frank & Associates, Inc., contingent upon approval of the Reimbursement Agreement wording bythe City Attorney, to reimburse Development Impact Fee (DIF) eligible off-site improvements associated with the La Quinta Court development in an amount not to exceed ~146,000 and additional negotiated City assistance in an amount not to exceed 9240,000 for approved infrastructure improvements that are outside of the scope of the DIF reimbursable improvements. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2001-40. Council concurred to take up Department Report 3-B at this time. DEPARTMENT REPORTS 3-B. REPORT REGARDING THE STATUS OF THE REFERENDUM FILED TO REPEAL RESOLUTION NO. 2001-09. City Clerk Greek presented a brief staff report. Tom Harms, 79-605 Cetrino, distributed a letter from the petitioners' attorney dealing with the specifics of the City Clerk's determination. He stated he did not feel the residents were confused when they signed the petition and that the voters deserve to be heard. He felt the overly-technical and legalistic approach City Council Minutes 9 April 3, 2001 taken by the City Clerk is incorrect and contrary to the spirit of the statute and voice of the citizens. He made the following statements in disagreeing with the City Clerk's reasons for rejecting the petition: the full text of the plan was attached and available to those who signed the petition; "amend" deals with various situations; and the specific plan does not need to be attached to the petition because the petition does not seek to modify the specific plan. He asked the Council to disallow the City Clerk's rejection of the petition. He felt to do otherwise would result in more litigation and uncertainty for the developer on a project that most everyone wants in the City. He urged Council to let either the voters' voices be heard or overturn the prior approval of the 78-foot height. Lawrence Cox, 52-505 Avenida Diaz, stated he felt the City Clerk's response was inappropriate because the petition was clearly understood by those who signed it. He asked Council to give additional consideration to the intent of the signers and to modify their prior approval of the project. Fred Wolff, 77-227 Calle Ensenada, stated he felt the hotel was approved without any consideration to negotiate its height and that Council's action was in conflict with the voice of the people. He believed the people knew what they were signing and recommended Council place this issue on the next Council agenda. Nelda Esmeralda, 52-404 Avenida Rubio, stated she was not confused when she signed the petition and that several citizens have indicated they are insulted with such a suggestion. Klm Bird, 52-360 Avenida Madero, believed the signers understood what they were signing and implored Council to rescind their prior approval of the project or allow the people to vote on the issue. Robert Courting, 53-180 Avenida Madero, stated he felt it was an insult to suggest he didn't understand what he was signing and asked Council to reject the City Clerk's decision. Nicholas Akers, 54-200 Eisenhower Drive, felt the rejection of the petition was a violation of the spirit of the law and didn't feel the 78-foot-high structure fits the area. Ken Stypulkoski, 53-560 Eisenhower Drive, informed Council he knew what he was signing and asked them to reverse their approval of the 78-foot height. City Council Minutes 10 April 3, 2001 Sandra Ripp, 53-560 Eisenhower Drive, stated she also understood what she was signing and felt others did also. Kay Wolff, 77-227 Calle Ensenada, distributed a letter with her comments on the rejection of the petition and asked that the issue be continued to the next agenda to allow their attorney to be present to speak. She also asked Council to reject the City Attorney's assessment as biased and put the issue to a vote. Joseph Broido, 77-510 Calle Nogales, felt the wishes of the community are at stake and that the hotel was approved because of tax revenue. He didn't feel the City should sell itself for tax revenue it does not need and urged Council to reject the statements of the City Attorney. Mary Haykerth, of PGA West, said she knew what she was signing and so did others. She urged Council to let the people vote on this issue or rescind their previous action. Bob Hargreaves, 76-740 Highway 111, Indian Wells, of Best Best & Krieger, representing Santa Rosa Plaza, stated the developer has sat down in good faith to negotiate a settlement agreement with the proponents that would mitigate the proponents' concerns and still maintain a viable project. The negotiations have resulted in a settlement agreement which limits the bulk of the hotel project to 48 feet and four stories. He didn't feel there was any intent by the people who circulated the petition to deceive those who signed the petition, but noted the law requires the petition to be implemented according to the language in the petition which, as currently drafted, removes the constraint on the height in the specific plan which is 79 feet. He believes the settlement agreement serves the community and represents a reasonable compromise. Vicky Marshand, 79-768 Arnold Palmer, felt there's sufficient space on the property to spread out the hotel and that the approved height would set a precedent for other developments in the City. She urged Council to reconsider their approval and adhere to the ordinance. City Attorney Jenson stated, legally, it is irrelevant whether the signers were confused or not because the City Clerk cannot look outside of the petition and the petition is what has to contain the language that goes on the ballot. She advised the petition does not contain language that could be placed on the ballot and noted the petitioners' attorney was also unable to identify the offending language. Attaching the entire resolution, she noted, does not cure the defect of the petition because the petition states it is seeking to repeal a portion of the resolution and the petition does not identify what portion of the resolution would be placed on the ballot for repeal. She further noted if the only language City Council Minutes 11 April 3, 2001 quoted in the petition were repealed it would allow a height in the specific plan up to 79 feet which is the opposite of what the voters are purporting to have intended when they signed the petition. She stated the City Clerk had no legal option but to reject the petition and advised there is no action for the City Council to take. Council Member Adolph stated he did not see a problem with the referendum and questioned there being five "substantial" statutory defects as referenced in the City Clerk's letter to Klm Bird. He stated he used common sense in reading the petition and understood the intent of the referendum to repeal the allowed height of 78 feet and to revert back to 35 feet as stated in the Zoning Ordinance. He stated it may be legally right for Council to amend the zoning ordinance but questioned it being morally right to change what the community wants. He recommended Council allow the issue to be placed on a ballot for the voters to decide what they want for the community. Mayor Pe~a stated he supported the project but had questions about the height. He asked the City Attorney if Council has any discretion in this matter. Ms. Jenson advised Council has no discretion to take action on this referendum petition nor did the City Clerk who had a mandatory duty to reject the petition. She added Council can choose to amend the Specific Plan but the referendum petition has been rejected. In response to Mayor Pe~a, Ms. Jenson confirmed Council's previous action authorized a hotel height up to 78 feet and the settlement agreement reached between the developer and the proponents sets forth additional height limitations. Although the City is not a party to the settlement agreement, it is authorized to enforce it. She advised the settlement agreement has no bearing on the action regarding the referendum petition. Mayor PeSa stated he supports height limits, but noted Council has no discretion in regards to the referendum petition. He stated he felt most people understood what they were intending to sign but he questioned there being a way to place language on the ballot, not contained in the petition, that would have the intent of achieving what the proponents desired. Council Member Adolph noted the proponents have requested this item be brought back in two weeks to allow their attorney to comment on the issue. After a brief recess, Ms. Jenson confirmed it would be appropriate for Council to go into closed session at this time pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) - threatened litigation. City Council Minutes 12 April 3, 2001 Council recessed to Closed Session. CLOSED SESSION 2. Conference with legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) - threatened litigation. Councilreconvened. Ms. Jenson stated the settlement agreement between the developer and the proponents imposes a height limitation of 48 feet. If substantial modification is made to the plans, they are required to go back to the Planning Commission and if appealed, to the City Council. The developer will be developing their plans which will most likely be reviewed by the Planning Commission. She added it would be appropriate, if Council wishes, to reconsider action at that time. Mayor Pe~a noted Council can also request the Specific Plan to be brought back. Council recessed to and until 7:00 p.m. 7:00 P.M. The City Council meeting reconvened with no decisions being made in Closed Session which require reporting pursuant to Section 54957.1 of the Government Code (Brown Act). PUBLIC COMMENT - None City Council Minutes 13 April 3, 2001 PRESENTATIONS The Mayor and Council Members presented art awards to the following students of La Quinta High School and Amistad High School whose artwork has been displayed at City Hall: Nicholas Aguayo Shawnese Crocket Brandon Nichols Leti Aldaz Aaron Dally Jenny Ning Precilla Avila Caitlin Delaney Becky Norton Melissa Ball Michael Duchene Jessica Pitt Sierra Boettcher Bella Golden-Harrell Daniel Porras Adrianne Bonafede Miranda Golden Kate Preston Chelsey Brewer Beth Hjorth Hannah Renew Kevin Brom Thomas Johnson Evelina Rodriguez Alicia Bruning Kevin Jones Anthony Sierra Alex Canevaro Simon Loredo Celina Valdez Jennifer Cooley Rebecca McEIfresh Victor Wille Melissa Zacarias PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION OF FEBRUARY 27, 2001, REQUIRING THE APPLICANT TO ENTER INTO AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND BOND FOR 50% OF THE COST OF A SIDEWALK CURB, AND GUTTER BETWEEN THE POINT HAPPY AND THE CLIFFHOUSE RESTAURANT ENTRY DRIVE PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION 2001- 025, CONDITION NO. 10.B. APPELLANT: CLIFFHOUSE RESTAURANT. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN at 7:08 p.m. Community Development Director Herman presented the staff report. In response to Council Member Adolph, Public Works Director Vogt advised the Point Happy project was not conditioned to reimburse the City for street improvements on Highway 111. The project is conditioned to install a sidewalk along the frontage to their property line, including a curb return on the west side and to upgrade the traffic signals at Channel Drive and the entry across from Lumpy's. Council Member Adolph noted Mr. Boudreau has questioned why the Cliffhouse should pay 50% of the sidewalk costs when they only cover one third of the area. City Council Minutes 14 April 3, 2OO1 Mr. Herman advised there are three parcels of land with the Cliffhouse owning Parcel 3, Michael Shovlin owning Parcel 2, and Point Happy owning Parcel 1. He stated the Cliffhouse original conditions of approval requires sidewalk improvements along 227 feet of the Cliffhouse frontage. The conditions of approval recommended by the Planning Commission relieves the Cliffhouse from having to install a sidewalk along its frontage and instead places the sidewalk along the frontage of the parcel to the east, ending at the Cliffhouse driveway. Council Member Henderson noted the Point Happy developer did not want to participate in a sidewalk along the mountain frontage because of safety concerns resulting in Council eliminating that condition from the project. She asked if the City would then be responsible for sidewalk costs along that portion of the mountain area. Mr. Herman stated responsibility for those costs has yet to be determined. He confirmed the Cliffhouse project is conditioned to participate in the Highway 111 median costs when constructed. In response to Mayor Pe~a, Mr. Vogt stated CalTrans usually requires a minimum sidewalk width of six feet adjacent to curb or an offset sidewalk five feet wide. He didn't know if pedestrian fencing would be required. In response to Council Member Adolph, Mr. Vogt stated the costs will depend on whether or not CalTrans requires fencing between the sidewalk and street, fencing or barricades between the sidewalk and mountain, and/or cutback of the mountain. Once a sidewalk-only design has been submitted to CalTrans for review, they will respond with any additional requirements. Council Member Perkins wished to have a survey on the stability of the mountain before moving forward with a sidewalk design. He felt the area is hazardous and could not support a sidewalk there. Richard Boudreau, 78-250 Highway 111, representing the Cliffhouse Restaurant, stated they are willing to pay a percentage of the sidewalk costs when that issue surfaces but don't feel it's right to place a condition on expansion of their parking lot that requires them to post a $50,000 bond for the sidewalk. There being no other requests to speak, the Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 7:20 p.m. City Council Minutes 15 April 3, 2001 Council Member Perkins stated he didn't feel the parking lot expansion should be subject to the sidewalk issue and preferred taking up the sidewalk issue at a later time. Council Member Henderson asked if the sidewalk would become a City project if this project is not conditioned for at least 30% of the costs, to which Mr. Vogt responded yes. Mr. Boudreau stated they will accept a condition requiring the Cliffhouse to pay $33,000 for their share of the sidewalk costs, which he understood has been estimated at $100,000. Mr. Herman advised the sidewalk costs will come back to Council at a later date. Mayor Pe~a suggested conditioning the project to 30% of the estimated costs with a cap amount. Council Member Sniff stated he wished to move forward with the parking lot expansion but felt there are a number of questions regarding the sidewalk issue that Council cannot comfortably address at this time except for placing a not-to- exceed dollar amount on the sidewalk costs. He felt somewhat uncomfortable dealing with the unknown. Council Member Adolph agreed and stated he totally supports what has been discussed. Mr. Vogt asked if Council wished to retain the original condition for a sidewalk on the west side of the Cliffhouse driveway. Mr. Herman noted the original condition requiring the frontage sidewalk was not included with this application. In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Herman confirmed the improvement bond for the original condition was never posted. Mr. Boudreau stated they are willing to go back to the original condition, including the bike path. After a brief discussion, Council concurred to add a condition requiring the applicant to post a bond for sidewalk improvements along the Cliffhouse frontage to the bridge. City Council Minutes 16 April 3, 2001 Council Member Sniff suggested a continuance, noting the proposed resolution is for denial-of the appeal. After a brief recess, Mr. Herman reviewed revised language for the resolution. RESOLUTION NO, 2001-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION FOR THE REVISED PARKING LOT AND LANDSCAPING FOR THE CLIFFHOUSE RESTAURANT (SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-692). It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to adopt Resolution No. 2001-27 as amended (adding Condition No. 10b to read, "The applicant shall improve or bond for his share of the street improvements along Highway 111 frontage; said improvements may include but not limited to landscaped median, curb and gutter, and sidewalks;" and adding Condition No. 10c to read, "The applicant is required to pay 30% of the improvements between his driveway and the Point Happy development and post a bond with a cap of $33,000; said bond shall be released by the City within five years if the sidewalk is not required." Motion carried unanimously. 2. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION OF FEBRUARY 13, 2001, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVING A 65-FOOT-HIGH SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE ANTENNA AND RELATED COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION 2001-15 AND 2001-16 FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-409 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-055 LOCATED AT 49-499 EISENHOWER DRIVE. APPELLANT: STEVE DAVIS. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN at 8:01 p.m. Community Development Director Herman presented the staff report. In response to Council Member Adolph, Mr. Herman stated communication towers are in a separate chapter of the municipal code with a height allowance of 100 feet. Mike Peroni, representing the appellant Steve Davis, stated Mr. Davis' residence is immediately north of the La Quinta Hotel and that he did not receive a public hearing notice for the Planning Commission meeting. He stated Mr. Davis City Council Minutes 17 April 3, 2001 understood from conversations with cellular contacts that the cell facility would be built into a new tower and constructed as part of the building. Mayor Pe~a asked if that information was included in correspondence from the cellular contacts, to which Mr. Peroni responded no. Mr. Peroni stated the 65-foot tower actually extends to 75 feet and will be in full view of Mr. Davis' residence. He stated the visual assessments were taken within the hotel property without any consideration for adjacent properties. He also presented photo simulations showing how the monopalm will look from various locations on Mr. Davis' property. He added Mr. Davis is concerned more towers will be placed in the City and hopes the City comes up with a better plan to deal with them in the future. Mr. Herman reviewed the location of the proposed monopalm and confirmed the simulation in the photograph is what the monopalm will look like. He advised a monopalm of the same height currently exists at the Desert Sands Unified School District Administration Center. David Leonard, 1223 University Avenue, Suite 240, Riverside, representing Sprint PCS, stated the La Quinta Hotel asked Sprint to locate a monopalm on their property to help their telecommunications needs. He stated the tower facility referred to by Mr. Peroni was for an AT&T cell site but the structural stability of the roof line did not accommodate their equipment. He also presented photo simulations of the monopalm and how it will look from Mr. Davis' property. He stated he met and reviewed the monopalm location with Mr. Davis before and at the Planning Commission hearing and understood he was satisfied with the issues. He stated the antenna is 65 feet high with custom designed palm fronds to screen the antenna panels. In response to Council Member Adolph, Mr. Leonard stated the palm fronds will be maintained by Sprint on a regular basis and that the material is colorfast. In response to Mayor Pe~a, Mr. Leonard advised the monopalm is for Sprint cell service only. A brief discussion ensued regarding Condition No. 8 and resulted in Mr. Leonard stating the language is acceptable. There being no further requests to speak, the Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 8:14 p.m. City Council Minutes 18 April 3, 2001 In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Herman confirmed there was some discussion at the Planning Commission hearing about replacing the monopalm with newer technology when it is available but no condition was added to the project. Mayor Pe~a suggested adding a sunset clause or review within three to five years. Council concurred to add a condition requiring review of the conditional use permit in five years. Mr. Herman noted the review will be by the Planning Commission unless appealed to City Council. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-409 PREPARED FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-055 APPEAL (APPLICANT: SPRINT PCS WIRELESS; APPELLANT: STEVE DAVIS). It was moved by Council Members Henderson/Adolph to adopt Resolution No. 2001-28 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPELLANT'S APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'SDECISlON OF FEBRUARY 13, 2001, APPROVINGA65-FOOT- HIGH SPRINT PCS WIRELESS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE AND RELATED EQUIPMENT CABINET AT 49-499 EISENHOWER DRIVE (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-055 - APPLICANT: SPRINT PCS WIRELESS; APPELLANT: STEVE DAVIS). It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to adopt Resolution No. 2001-029 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes 19 April 3, 2001 3. PUBLIC HEARING ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-412, SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-052, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-056, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-690 - A REQUEST FOR 1) CERTIFICATION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION; 2) DEVELOPMENT OF PRINCIPALS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR A COMMERCIAL BUILDING CONSISTING OF A RESTAURANT AND OFFICE; AND 3) DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE COMMERCIAL PROJECT LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND LAKE LA QUINTA DRIVE. APPLICANT: OMRI SIKLAI. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN at 8:19 p.m. Community Development Director presented the staff report. Lewis Bishop, 73-350 El Paseo, Palm Desert, of Stanford Leonhard Bishop Architects, gave a brief review of the building materials and stated the exterior metal material is not reflective. Geri Gouthier, 47-030 Via Lorca, stated she was pleased to have the Omri Boni Restaurant in the City but was concerned about the excessive use of concrete block and corrugated steel in the building. DavidThoms, 47-410Via Cordova, complimented the architects on the building but stated he was not sure the proposed location is the right place for it. He felt the use of non-finished, concrete block was boring and that it should be split-face or sandblasted. He was concerned the shortage in parking spaces will result in vehicles parking on Caleo Bay and the lack of street lighting will compromise safety along the sidewalk. He was also concerned the parking lot lighting would be Iow or high-pressure sodium and suggested lighting similar to what is used at the auto mall. He also wished to know the height of the poles and type of fixtures. He questioned the landscaping on Washington Street as well as the berm on Caleo Bay because of the grade and stated he felt the project should be referred to staff for further review. Ira Gribin, 75-641 Valle Vista, Indian Wells, spoke in support of the restaurant. Martin Shainen, 78-955 Via Florence, stated he didn't feel the building fits the character of'La Quinta and especially the Lake La Quinta development. He was also concerned Caleo Bay will become an "accident waiting to happen" because of the increased traffic and parking. He asked Council to refer the project back to staff to come up with a building more appropriate for the community. City Council Minutes 20 April 3, 2001 Kathy Gribin, 75-641 Valle Vista, Indian Wells, spoke in support of the restaurant. Robert Zemer, 47-965 Via Trieste, stated he didn't feel the architecture fits the location and was concerned the shortage in parking will cause people to park on Caleo Bay. He urged Council not to approve this project. Dutch Dilsaver, 78-835 Dulce Del Mar, questioned the architecture of the building fitting the area and suggested the project be referred back to staff and the Planning Commission for redesign of the metal surfaces to a softer finish and the bright colors to pastel colors. Gene Wyskocil, 47-965 Via Jardin, voiced concern about the shortage of parking spaces and the effect it will have if parking is allowed on Caleo Bay. He questioned the assumption that the office space would not use the parking lot during restaurant hours and noted some businesses, such as telephone operation centers, work two or more shifts. He implored the City to establish and utilize consistent architecture and parking standards and to consider the concerns of the Lake La Quinta residents. Leo Ahem, 47-780 Via Firenze, stated he was appalled at the architecture and has concerns about the parking and lighting. He felt the restaurant's extended weekend hours are inconsistent with the environment of the area and he has safety concerns about the increase in traffic. He was also concerned about the lack of architectural standards in the area and the proposed project setting a precedent. He asked Council to refer the project back to staff. John Miller, 47-850 Via Nice, stated he was concerned about the architecture, parking shortage, and safety issues and asked Council to refer the project back to the Planning Commission. Audrey Ostrowsky, P.O. Box 351, voiced concern about recent projects being approved without sufficient parking. Larry Borses, of Lake La Quinta, expressed safety concerns about vehicles being allowed to park on Caleo Bay. Jeff Hawkins, 51-405 Avenida Rubio, spoke in support of the project and stated he felt the building architecture is appropriate across the street from the La Quinta Arts Foundation. Boni $iklai, the applicant, advised the restaurant will have both valet and self parking and that they do not intend to use Caleo Bay for parking. They also do City Council Minutes 21 April 3, 2001 not plan to rent the office space to a telephone operation center. They feel the architecture is unique and noted the landscape plans show that the building will barely be visible from Lake La Quinta. The parking lot lighting will be Iow intensity and on seven-foot-high lighting standards. Walt Blasic, of Lake La Quinta, questioned the parking issue. Mr. Bishop stated the conditions of approval do not allow overlapping of the office and restaurant hours of operation. In addition, valet parking will allow more cars to be parked in the same amount of spaces. Omri $iklai, the applicant, stated he felt the residents' fears are exaggerated and that the desert-oriented structure will look better than the drawings. He advised additional land was purchased to accommodate the City's parking requirements and he felt the parking lot lighting will make Caleo Bay safer. He also felt the heavy landscaping will buffer the restaurant from Lake La Quinta and he urged Council to approve the restaurant. There being no other requests to speak, the Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 9:10 p.m. In response to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Herman confirmed the project meets the City's parking requirements. Council Member Perkins stated he felt Council may need to look at banning parking on Caleo Bay and wished to see the exterior of the building softened somewhat. In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Herman stated the parking lot lighting will be along the perimeter as well as inside the parking lot and the lighting standards are smaller than those approved for the Palmer Restaurant. Council Member Henderson noted the drawings show two different types of lighting standards and the need to make sure the required lighting standards are in the final Plan check. She commented on the diversity of the community and stated she welcomes the project to the City. She felt the location across from the La Quinta Arts Foundation is great and totally supports the project. Council Member Adolph stated he liked the design but has a problem with the color and materials. He stated he is protective of the City's compatibility issues and was concerned the proposed architecture will not be compatible with the surrounding properties. He stated he could not support the project as proposed. City Council Minutes 22 April 3, 2001 Council Member Sniff stated he feels compatibility is important, particularly in residential communities, but believes diversity can be attractive and creative. He supported the project and felt, overall, it will be an asset to the City. Mayor Pe~a stated he felt the design is unique and a landmark that will draw people to the community. He has some concerns about the siding and noted it has been used elsewhere in the desert. He agreed parking may become an issue but felt that is the nature of a good restaurant. In response to Mayor Pe~a, Mr. Herman confirmed the building encroaches a total of six feet into the 30-foot setback which is three feet beyond the 10% allowance. Mayor Pe~a didn't disagree with the design but felt different siding materials might soften the effect of the building. Mr. Herman reviewed the elevation and landscaping plans and the materials proposed for the building. In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Bishop confirmed the metal siding is available in different colors. A brief discussion ensued regarding the possibility of changing the siding material and/or color with no consensus reached. In response to Mayor Pe6a, Mr. Bishop stated the selected materials are earthy and standard and the colors uniform and subtle except for the entrance. He felt the character of the building demands the proposed horizontal ribbed look. RESOLUTION NO. 2001~30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-412 PREPARED FOR SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-052, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001- 056, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-690 (OMRI SIKLAI). It was moved by Council Members Henderson/Sniff to adopt Resolution No. 2001-30 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes 23 April 3, 2001 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PRINCIPALS AND GUIDELINES FOR A RESTAURANT AND OFFICE BUILDING (SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-052 - OMRI SIKLAI). It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to adopt Resolution No. 2001-31 as submitted. Motion carried with Council Member Adolph voting NO. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING RESTAURANT AND OFFICE USES AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND LAKE LA QUINTA DRIVE (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-056 - OMRI SIKLAI). It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to adopt Resolution No. 2001-32 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR A RESTAURANT AND OFFICE BUILDING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND LAKE LA QUINTA DRIVE (SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-690-OMRI SIKLAI). It was moved by Council Members Henderson/Sniff to adopt Resolution No. 2001-33 as submitted. Motion carried with Council Member Adolph voting NO. 4. PUBLIC HEARING TO CERTIFY A MITIGATED DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-408, PRE-ANNEXATION GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-074 TO GOLF COURSE AND LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR APPROXIMATELY 280 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD AND MONROE STREET. APPLICANT: VILLAGE AT THE PALMS. Mayor PeRa abstained due to a potential conflict of interest and left the dais. The Mayor Pro Tern declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN at 9:56 p.m. City Council Minutes 24 April 3, 2001 Community Development Director Herman presented the staff report. In response to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Herman confirmed the tract map for the residential and golf course were approved by the County. The two 40-acre vacant parcels south of the development with similar uses have also requested annexation and have no County approvals. In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Herman confirmed this is an application from the property owner to be annexed into the City along with letters of support from the two 40-acre parcels. There being no requests to speak, the Mayor Pro Tern declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 10:03 p.m. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-408 PREPARED FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-074 AND ZONE CHANGE 2001-098 ESTABLISHING PRE-ANNEXATION DESIGNATIONS FOR 280 ACRES (VILLAGE AT THE PALMS). It was moved by Council Members Henderson/Perkins to adopt Resolution No. 2001-34 as submitted. Motion carried with Mayor Pe~a ABSENT. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-074 TO ASSIGN GOLF COURSE AND LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION TO APPROXIMATELY 280 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD AND MONROE STREET (VILLAGE AT THE PALMS). It was moved by Council Members Adolph/Henderson to adopt Resolution No. 2001-35 as submitted. Motion carried with Mayor Pe~a ABSENT. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Henderson/Adolph to take up Ordinance No. 355 by title and number only and waive further reading. Motion carried with Mayor Pe~a ABSENT. City Council Minutes 25 April 3, 2001 ORDINANCE NO. 355 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 2001-098 ASSIGNING GOLF COURSE AND LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION TO APPROXIMATELY 280 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD AND MONROE STREET (VILLAGE AT THE PALMS). It was moved by Council Members Henderson/Adolph to introduce Ordinance No. 355 on first reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Mayor Pro Tern Sniff NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Pe~a ABSTAIN: None Council concurred to receive public comments at this time on Department Report 3-B. Elly Dowd, 51-345 Avenida Juarez, protested the height of the hotel and stated she felt the petition signers understood what they were signing. Stewart Woodard, 79-791 Olympia Fields, voiced disappointment in the approved height of the hotel and concern that other developments will request similar heights. He questioned locating a hotel across from an elementary school and stated he felt the site plan has no sense of pedestrian access or linkage to downtown. He also questioned how the project fits into the village. He believed residents are strongly opposed to the approval of the hotel and will voice their opposition in the next election if Council continues in this direction. Carl Brooks, 54-781 Riviera, stated he believed those who signed the petition knew what they were signing and that other property owners who are not voters support the petition. Margaret Najarian, 78-395 Palm Garden Place, stated she understood the petition she signed. Hovak Najarian, 78-395 Palm Garden Place, urged Council to listen to the voice of the people. Suzanne Andreasen, 53-740 Eisenhower Drive, stated she understood what she was signing. She also felt Council is not listening to the people and that the people will not support them in the next election. City Council Minutes 26 April 3, 2001 Charmaine Lewis, 52-545 Avenida Rubio, stated she didn't feel a hotel over 35 feet should be allowed as stated in the City ordinance and was not confused or misled when she signed the petition. James Lewis, 52-545 Avenida Rubio, stated he felt the hotel would be a blot to the City and took exception to the statement that he was confused and misled when he signed the petition. Paul Rasmussen, 78-742 Via Carmel, echoed the previous comments and noted no high-rise buildings are in the City logo. He stated he moved to La Quinta because of its dark skies and small community atmosphere. Jackie Rasmussen, 78-742 Via Carmel, questioned the village being the right location for a hotel. Cathy Sullivan, 48-465 Via Solana, stated she felt people understood what they were signing and urged Council to listen to the wishes of their constituents. Patti Hallstein, 78-875 Rio Seco, stated she is not registered to vote in La Quinta but is a property owner and urges Council to reconsider their approval of a six-story hotel. Wayne Nystrom, 78-094 Calle Norte, stated he understood the petition and felt the intent of the signers is clear. He noted the developer agreed to lower the hotel height after a lawsuit was filed and wished to try harder to get it down more. He felt those who signed the petition could carry some weight in removing the Council Members from office. William Beavers, 53-480 Avenida Juarez, voiced concern that the hotel will increase traffic and block the view from the cove. He asked Council to reduce the hotel height to two or three stories, preferably three stories, and said he believed people knew what they were signing. David Salvatierra, 54-455 Avenida Madero, stated he felt it is discriminatory for Council to approve height variances to developments with money while homeowners have to adhere to the City's ordinance. He believed people understood what they were signing. Joan Beavers, 53-480 Avenida Juarez, echoed the previous comments. Denise Diamond, 53-960 Avenida Alvarado, stated she was offended to read in the newspaper that she may have been confused or misled about what she was signing when she signed the petition. She felt it was misleading and confusing for the public City Council Minutes 27 April 3, 2001 to go through due process only to be told that it does not count. She urged Council to listen to the citizens. Michael Dala, 52-404 Avenida Rubio, commented on a hotel project in Palm Springs that hurt the downtown area and urged Council to take that into consideration when looking at what they want for the village, Jeff Smith, 54-631 Avenida Alvarado, stated he felt it was a mistake to approve the 78-foot height and to allow a legal technicality to invalidate a petition undertaken in good faith and with full knowledge by those who signed it. Additionally, he felt it was wrong to make people wait so late in the meeting to speak on this issue. He asked Council to turn down the six or four-story hotel and approve a hotel that fits within the 35-foot height limitation. Cindy Hayward, 54-733 Avenida Diaz, agreed that the speakers should have been allowed to speak on this issue earlier in the meeting. She also voiced concern that the hotel at the current height will change the atmosphere of the cove. She felt the petition may have lacked legal language but believed it's indicative of how the residents feel on this issue. She asked Council to act in accordance to the residents' wishes. Seth Hoffman, 52-862 Eisenhower Drive, spoke about the need for residents to trust their elected officials and stated he hoped the Council would listen to the voice of the people. Margaret Seeley, 53-680 Avenida Martinez, questioned why the City approved an eyesore like the hotel when it complains about trash cans being visible on residents' properties. Greg Olsen spoke regarding the need to follow City Codes so residents know what can be built adjacent to their property and stated he felt a six-story hotel is wrong. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS 1. DISCUSSION REGARDING TRAFFIC CONTROL IN EMERGENCIES. Council Member Perkins expressed concern about the manner in which traffic control was handled during the recent traffic accident on Washington Street. He felt a clearly defined plan is needed wherein the Sheriff's Department and City employees respond with traffic cones and traffic diversion signs so traffic flow is not completely impeded within any given section of the City. City Council Minutes 28 April 3, 2001 Council Member Adolph reported he and Council Member Perkins met with homeowners in the Adams Park area to discuss their concerns about use of the park. STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSSION OF DRAFT FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2001/2002 THROUGH 2005/2006. Council concurred to continue this item to April 17, 2001. 2. DISCUSSION OF DRAFT 2001/2002 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN. Council concurred to continue this item to April 17, 2001. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS All reports were noted and filed. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California