Loading...
2001 06 19 CCI ` I City Council Agendas are available on the City's web page @www.la-quinta.org City Council Agenda CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-495 Calle Tampico - La Quinta, California 92253 Regular Meeting TTuesday, June 19 2001 - 2.00 P.M. Beginning Res. No. 2001-71 Ord. No. 358 ROLL CALL: Council Members: Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (a), PENDING LITIGATION, COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT V. CITY OF LA QUINTA, RIVERSIDE SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. INC 010827 2. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT - CITY ATTORNEY - PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957. 3. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT - CITY MANAGER - PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957. 4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(b), POTENTIAL EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION. City Council Agenda Page 1 June 19, 2001 i NOTE: Time permitting, the City Council may conduct Closed Session discussions during the dinner recess. Additionally, if the City is considering acquisition of real property, persons identified as negotiating parties do not attend the closed session. RECONVENE AT 3:00 P.M. IV. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE fail AZd9uLtil4 l At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or matters that are not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. Please watch the timing device on the podium. For all Business Session matters or Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak to come forward at the appropriate time. VI. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA VII. PRESENTATIONS - None LETTER FROM FRIENDS OF THE LA QUINTA SENIOR CENTER REGARDING ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. 2. LETTER FROM COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS OF THE DESERT REGARDING THE VETS EXPRESS TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM. IX. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - None Note: Consent Calendar items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved by one motion unless requested for separate consideration by a member of the City Council or the public. 1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED JUNE 19, 2001. 2. TRANSMITTAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT DATED APRIL 30, 2001. 3. TRANSMITTAL OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES REPORT DATED APRIL 30, 2001. 4. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE TO BE HELD SEPTEMBER 12-15, 2001 IN SACRAMENTO, CA. City Council Agenda Page 2 June 19, 2001 5. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR COMMUNITY SAFETY MANAGER TO ATTEND A TRAINING CLASS GIVEN BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS, INC., ANAHEIM, CA JUNE 22 AND 23, 2001. 6. APPROVAL OF A CHANGE ORDER WITH RAY LOPEZ ASSOCIATES FOR EISENHOWER PARK IMPROVEMENTS. 7. APPROVAL OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO RECEIVE BIDS FOR CITYWIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS., PROJECT NO. 2000-04. 8. APPROVAL TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO CONSTRUCT TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AT CALLE TAMPICO/AVENIDA BERMUDAS, PROJECT NO. 2000-17. 9. ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT NO. 2001-01 MILES AVENUE SOIL EXPORT PROJECT. 10. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 29894-2, COUNTRY CLUB OF THE DESERT, LLC. 11. AUTHORIZATION FOR RELEASE OF SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT SECURITY ASSOCIATED WITH TRACT 24317-3. 12. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 30056, OLD CALIFORNIA VILLAGE AT TRADITIONS. 13. ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT DEED FOR CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 2001-022, WAIVED PARCEL MAP NO. 28435. 14. ACCEPTANCE OF DEDICATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ON HIGHWAY 111 - LA QUINTA CORPORATE CENTER 15. ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT NO. 98-16 FRITZ BURNS PARK FENCE REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS. XI. BUSINESS SESSION 1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE INVESTMENT POLICY OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 /2002. A. RESOLUTION ACTION 2. CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO THE ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE, COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION, CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION, HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION, INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD AND PLANNING COMMISSION. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTIONS 3 City Council Agenda Page 3 June 19, 2001 mi XIII 3. CONSIDERATION OF UTILIZING CITY -OWNED BUILDING IN THE VILLAGE AS OFFICES FOR LA QUINTA POLICE DEPARTMENT. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 4. CONSIDERATION OF A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT FOR THE LA QUINTA FACILITY. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 5. CONSIDERATION OF A JOINT USE AGREEMENT WITH THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 6. CONSIDERATION OF DONATION OF ART PIECE BY AEDWYN DARROLL. A. RESOLUTION ACTION 7. CONSIDERATION OF A MEETING SCHEDULE REGARDING VISTA SANTA ROSA. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION B. CONSIDERATION OF LOCATION OF A THIRD FIRE STATION TO SERVE NORTHERN PORTIONS OF THE CITY. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION STUDY SESSION - NONE REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS 2. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WORKSHOP/INFORMATION EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (PERKINS) 3. C.V. MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (PERKINS) 4. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (SNIFF) 5. DESERT RESORTS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 6. DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AD HOC COMMITTEE (HENDERSON/ADOLPH) 7. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES COMMITTEE 8. MUSEUM EXPANSION COMMITTEE (ADOLPH/SNIFF) 9. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION & VISITORS AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 10. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS AIRLINE SERVICES COMMITTEE (HENDERSON) 11. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION 12. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FREE LIBRARY SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE 13. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DESERT LIBRARY ZONE ADVISORY BOARD (HENDERSON) 14. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (PENA) 15. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY/SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP (PENA) 16. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MAY 8, AND 22, 2001 17. HISTORIC PRESERVATION MINUTES FOR MAY, 19, 2001 18. ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES FOR MAY 2, 2001. 4 City Council Agenda Page 4 June 19, 2001 XIV. 1 . CITY MANAGER A. RESPONSE(S) TO PUBLIC COMMENT. 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK A. REPORT ON UPCOMING EVENTS. 4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIRECTOR A. MONTHLY REPORT FOR MAY, 2001 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR A. MONTHLY REPORT FOR MAY, 2001 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR A. MONTHLY REPORT FOR MAY, 2001 7. FINANCE DIRECTOR B. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER A. MONTHLY REPORT FOR MAY, 2001. 9. POLICE CHIEF A. MONTHLY REPORT FOR MAY, 2001 10. FIRE CHIEF A. QUARTERLY REPORT RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. XVI. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak form and limit your comments to three (3) minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. XVII. PRESENTATIONS - NONE XVIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak, to come forward at the appropriate time. PUBLIC HEARING ON LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 89-1, FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 A. RESOLUTION ACTION City Council Agenda Page 5 June 19, 2001 2. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CERTIFICATION OF AN ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT #41; GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-078 AND ZONE CHANGE 2001-101 TO CHANGE LANDS CURRENTLY DESIGNATED TOURIST COMMERCIAL TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; SPECIFIC PLAN 121-E, AMENDMENT #5 ESTABLISHING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 65 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, COMMON AREA FACILITIES AND AN AMENDMENT OF THE LANDSCAPING PLANT PALETTE; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-703 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE MODEL HOMES; AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30125 FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF 17.82 ACRES INTO 65 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS AND MISCELLANEOUS LOTS, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EISENHOWER DRIVE AND AVENUE 50. APPLICANT: KSL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) B. READ BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE C. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE 3. PUBLIC HEARING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29858 PHASE 23, RECONFIGURING SEVEN ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE TRACT INTO 18 SINGLE FAMILY AND OTHER COMMON LOTS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET SOUTH OF AVENUE 50 AND WEST OF JEFFERSON STREET WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN 2000-048. APPLICANT: RJT HOMES, LLC. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) XIX. ADJOURNMENT - To a Special Meeting to be held on June 26, 2001 to consider the FY 2001- 2002 Annual Budget. The next regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council will be held at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 3, 2001, in the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. i City Council Agenda Page 6 June 19, 2001 I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the City Council meeting of June 19, 2001, was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chambers, 78-495 Calls Tampico and on the bulletin boards at the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce and at Stater Bros., 78-630 Highway 111, on Friday, June 15, 2001. DATED: June 15, 2001 T JU EEK, CIVIC City Clerk, City of La Quinta, California PUBLIC NOTICE The La Quints City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at 777-7025, 24-hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. 7 City Council Agenda Page 7 June 19, 2001 'NAZIM OZEL P.O. Box 171 Indio, CA 92202 Phone: (760) 863-5230 Fax: (760) 863-5295 EDUCATION University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 1976-1978 MASTER OF FINE ARTS Major: Painting, Sculpture and interdisciplinary studies Minor: Music The School of Fine and Applied Arts — Istanbul, Turkey 1966-1971 BACHELOR OF FINE ARTS Major: Painting — Architectural -Environmental Painting & Sculpture TEACHING EXPERIENCE University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Lecturer, Basic Drawing 1978 Teaching Assistant, Basic Drawing 1976-1977 Project Assistant, Art History 1976 GRANTS AND AWARDS SIXTIETH ANNUAL NATIONAL EXHIBITION OF CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN PAINTING SOCIETY OF THE FOUR ARTS, Palm Beach, FL 1999 Phillip Hulitar Award — Juried by James Demetrion, Director Hirshorn Museum, Washington D.C. CORAL SPRINGS MUSEUM OF ART Juried First Prize - Painting CORAL SPRINGS, FL FOUNDER'S EXHIBITION, AWARD OF EXCELLENCE Naples Art Association, Naples, FL BOCA RATON MUSEUM ART GUILD EXHIBITION Best of Show Boca Raton, FL CAPE CORAL ART LEAGUE Best of Show — Painting Cape Coral, FL. 1999 1999 1999 p 1998 O NAPLES ART ASSOCIATION ANNUAL First Prize — Oil Painting 1998 Naples, FL. ERNEST HEMINGWAY FESTIVAL First Prize — Oil Painting 1997 Art Competition — Sanibel Island, FL. BIG ARTS Best of Show - Painting 1997 Sanibel Island, FL. SCULPTURE MEDIA RESEARECH GRANT (SUMMER & FALL) 1976 Milwaukee Graduate School, University of Wisconsin PAINTING AWARD, Turkish Radio and Television Union 1971 NATIONAL: Presented to the Top Ten Artists in the Country SELECTED ONE MAN SHOWS Painting — Daytona Beach Art League Center 1999 Daytona Beach, FL Painting, Sculpture - West Wing Gallery, Naples, FL. 1998 Painting, Mixed Media — Art House, Fort Myers, FL. 1998 Painting, Sculpture, Mixed Media — San Francisco, Hunter's Point 1989-1996 Naval Shipyard Open Studio — San Francisco, CA Installation: National Painting and Sculpture Museum, Ankara, Turkey 1987 Gallery Installation: Sanfra Gallery, Istanbul, Turkey 1987 Painting and Combined Media Exhibition: Gallerie Pallete, 1987 Schweinfurt, West Germany Painting Exhibition: Acorn Gallery, Boulder, CO. 1980 Gallery Installation — Happening: Fine Arts Gallery, University of Wisconsin 1978 Milwaukee, WI Painting and Sculpture Exhibition: Bradley Galleries, Milwaukee, WI 1978 Painting Exhibition and Flute Recital (Expo-Concierto) 1974 Galeria Vittorio, Guatemala City, Guatemala Painting Exhibition: Gallerie L'Abbayye, Brussels, Belgium 1973 9 SELECTED SOLO PERFORMANCES AND CONCERTS Cabrillo Music Festival — "East/West: Close Ups" 1991 Calssical & New Music: Civic Auditorium, Santa Cruz, CA "Holes of Perception": Multi -Media Install ation/Performance 1985 Mills College Concert Hall, Oakland, CA. "New Departures" Concert 1985 Theatre Artaud, San Francisco, CA. "Ancient to the Future Music" Concert 1984 Shared Visions, Berkeley, CA. "Live Oak Tree" (Experimental Music Concert) 1983 Performing Arts Theatre. Cabrillo College, Aptos, CA. "Slingshot" (Mixed Media Event) 1978 Fine Arts Recital Hall, University of Wisconsin, Mulwaukee, WI. "Interruptions" (Multi -Media Performance) 1977 Fine Arts Recital Hall, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI. SELECTED GROUP EXHIBITIONS AND MUSIC PERFORMANCES San Diego Art Institute — Endangered Spaces Juried Exhibition 2001 San Diego, CA 11 Palm Springs Desert Museum 2001 Annual Juried Exhibition, Palm Springs, CA City of Palm Springs Arts Commission — Annual Juried Exhibition 2001 Palm Springs, CA Arts for Act 2000 & 1999 Harborside Convention Hall Fort Myers, FL. Annual Exhibition and Auction Hosted and participated by Robert Rauschenberg Art in Public Places, Juried, Southwest Florida 1999 101h Annual Art Exhibition for Lee County, FL. Art Encounter '99, 17`h Annual Juried Exhibition 1999 The Von Liebig Art Center, Naples, FL. 1() Art '99, Juried, Mixed Media, Southwest Florida Artists 1999 Edison Community College Gallery of Fine Arts, Ft. Myers, FL. Naples Art Association Founders Exhibit, Juried 1999 The Von Liebig Art Center, Naples, Florida Coral Springs Museum of Art, Coral Springs, FL 1999 Art Encounter '99 17th Annual Exhibition 1999 Van Liebig Art Center, Naples FL Coral Springs Art Museum 1999 Coral Springs Art League Museum Show, Juried — Coral Springs, FL Coral Springs Museum of Art 1999 Boca Museum of Art Guild Exhibition Boca Museum Art Guild and Gallery Exhibition 1999 Best of Show Award Sixtieth Annual National Exhibition of Contemporary Painting 1998 The Society of the Four Arts, Palm Beach, FL. Juried by James Demetrion, Director, Hirshman Museum, Washington, D.C. Center For Emerging Art 1998 Invitational Exhibition 1998 Center For Emerging Art, Miami, FL. Experimental Musical Instruments (Invitational) 1987 California Arts and Craft Museum, San Francisco, CA. Contemporary Arts: 30,000 B.C. — Present; Sculpture, Juried 1985 San Jose Institute of ContemporaryArt, San Jose, CA. Diamanda Galas — Nazim Ozel Concert 1985 I -Beam, San Francisco, CA Celebration of Sculpture: Mixed Media Installation/Sculpture, Juried 1985 Fort Mason Center, San Francisco, CA Paintings, Juried 1985 San Francisco Art Institute Satellite Exhibition, San Francisco, CA Installation, San Francisco Arts Commission Festival, Juried 1985 San Francisco, CA Environmental Sculpture Exhibition, Juried 1979 Aspen Visual Arts Center, Aspen, CO. 11 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE FREE LANCE ARTIST 1979-Present Art Shows And Musical Performances 1972-1974 Throughout Europe, United States and Central America PROFESSIONAL ARTIST 1966-1972/1974-1975 Commissioned by corporations, theaters, nightclubs, hotels, etc... for works with bas relief, mosaic, fresco, graffito, stained glass, molding and other techniques. Worked with clay, glass, concrete, plaster, wood, metal, paint, pigments, etc..., and light (architectural and environmental). Projects include monumental works as heavy as 15 tons. Studied classical Turkish music with leading musicians of the country. Mastered the most demanding wind instruments of Turkish music, the ney. Practiced broad range of Eastern and Western instruments (wind, bowed, plucked) In both microtonal and equal -tempered systems. Studied new music and experimented extensively with music and sound as an artistic element. LECTURES 1980-1986 University of California, Santa Cruz, CA Cabrillo College, Aptos, CA Mills College, Oakland, CA Deri Show, Istanbul, Turkey RADIO APPEARANCES 1. 1980-1985 NPR, KPFA, Berkley, CA. KGO, KUSF, San Francisco, CA. KUSP, Santa Cruz, CA. KAZU, Monterey, CA. 1981-1985 Classical and Improvisational Turkish Music University of California, Santa Cruz, CA Lauden Nelson Center, Santa Cruz, CA Shared Visions, Berkley, CA Painting, Drawing and Murals SPECTRA, (Cultural council of Santa Cruz, CA.) Elementary Schools in Santa Cruz and Felton, CA.; Worked with Children and Teachers K-5�h Grade. 1? LIMA PA�z Qpmm-,-� David Roberdes 54-015 Southern Hills LA Quinta CA 92253 City Council Meeting 6/19/01 La Quinta The Height of the berm was defined on the original plan, At 6' the City Council approved this plan. The Country Club of the desert, without Approval or concern. To its neighbors. Raised the height of the berm to 25' This is not even close to the approved plan it is my understanding, after reading the minutes to the planning commission meeting that developers do there grading at there own risk until final. Then if there is a problem it well is corrected. Now is the time Correct this Major problem. .,. few remarks on the Plannine Commission Meetine of 5/22/01 Paragraph # 4 States there is no doubt they have deviated from the approved plan Checking the grade stakes on the project it appears that the berm will be 25' that is an increase of 19' without City Council approval Paragraph #8 Commissioner Ables Ask What's the height of the berm the question was not answered, what is the height of the berm, this should be known to all homeowners (a, PGA West. Paragraph 10 Country Club of the desert is concerned about the value of their project without the berm. No one is considering the impact, this will have on the value of the PGA homes It will Block the north Mountain View completely. Paragraph # 13 Country Club of the desert does not desire to see our roof tops @ PGA PGA does not have the desire to look @ a 25' berm, The country club of the desert should have considered the roof Top problem in the original plan. Therefore PGA Home owners would have opportunity to review Country Club of the Desert intention. 14 Paragraph # 16 there is no one inspecting or checking the height of the berm until final inspection, Country club of the desert is able to add height at there own desecration Faragraph #17 #18 Commissioner Butler And Commissioner Tyler states good presentation. The problem with the presentation no one was representing PGA West Paragraph # 19 & 20 Commission Tyler, States 54 Street is like driving through the Grand Canyon, Chairman Robbins Stated he also was concerned Chairman Robbins and Commissioner Tyler states after the presentation its OK. The presentation does not change the facts that on 54 streets it still feels like you are in the Grand Canyon In Closing Using the Excuses, need the berm to balance the project, that is not our concern the value of our home is, Having the berm 25' high with 30 % sod leaves 70 % Desert planting. When the wind blows This High Berm generates more dust then the lower berm, The dust problem will never end The berm was constructed without approval so it should be removed and constructed as per the original Plan. 15 P"A. 3' as- P. rn . p "W� 545 / 1 So.d.. —4A daQaintq C-492253 760-564-0913 3 yy�760-564-/996 e- vailpq.@aol com The Honorable Mayor Pena & The City Counsel of LaQuinta City Hall LaQuinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena & The City Counsel: June 19, 2001 On behalf of hundreds of residents of PGA West I would like to thank you for the opportunity to address the counsel. We are concerned about the size of the berm on Avenue 54 that has been constructed by the Country Club of the Desert. We understand that the counsel originally approved a 6 foot high berm. It has now grown to 20-25 feet. Since we feel it will adversely affect the value of our homes we looked into the reason for its size. We found out that on May 22, 2001, Country Club of the Desert requested a variance, AFTER they had erected the 20-25 foot high wall. We at PGA West were never notified of this meeting. Also note, that no where in the minutes does it stipulate that they can have a 20-25 foot berm in lieu of the 6 foot berm approved by this counsel and accepted by the developer at that time. This dirt wall is as high as the roof tops across the street at PGA West. A copy of those minutes are attached. This request for variance was for the developers own benefit. I would like to cite several items from that report. Item 4- "In this instance there is no doubt they have deviated from the APPROVED plan." Item 10-Ms. Nancy Aaronson, representing the Country Club of the Desert states, "Aesthetically from inside the project the berming is essential to protect the value of the project." She obviously does not care about the value of any other property. I will address this later. Item 13- Mr. Steve Garcia, landscape architect for the Country Club of the Desert stated "the reason for the height was to hide the view of the roof tops at PGA West." We are surprised that he finds the roof tops of PGA West to be so offensive when he obviously has no problem with their northern perimeter which 1_m is along the canal and over which they will eventually be viewing the roof tops of a new bank and shopping center. Why is their berm only the normal 5-6 feet high there verses the 20-25 foot height on their Southern perimeter? The reason is that if they had a 20-25 foot high berm on their Northern perimeter, to hide roof tops, they would have no view of the Chocolate Mountains and consequently the value of their real estate would decrease in value. They have too much real estate to sell to allow this to happen and yet they seem to have no problem in reducing the value of real estate that belongs to others for their own benefit. ; Item 17-Commissioner Ables stated "it was a nice presentation and he would have no objections." Naturally it was a nice presentation as it was entirely self serving to Country Club of the Desert. Item 19- Commissioner Tyler stated "that driving by presently is like driving though the Grand Canyon. There has been a lot of concern voiced by the residents of PGA West. He had strong objections and after the presentation his objection is SOMEWHAT tempered." Now I would like to draw your attentions to the photographs. I apologize for their quality as they were taken this morning and as you realize, today is a rather hazy day. Photo 1- The height of the berm as seen in contrast to the height of a car on the street. Photo 2-The height of the berm when compared with PGA West across the street. It can be noted that the berm height is equal to the very top of the roof height of the PGA West homes. Please note that this grade level is contrary to what is there now. S Photo -The current view of the Chocolate Mountains currently enjoyed by the residents of PGA West. This the most important photo of all. Please, in your mind, take the trees and now plant them on the roof tops as this is the current height of the berm in question. When that is done, the entire vista of the Chololate Mountains disappears for all of PGA West and along with it, a significant value of our real-estate. Why is this being allowed? There is no reaason for us to suffer potential real loss to their benefit. 3 Photo'+ A view of the "normal" berm the Country Club of the Desert has installed along their Northern perimeter along the canal. Please note that they have maintained an unobstructed view of the Chocolate Mountains for the benefit of their future residents and to maintain the value of their real-estate. 17 PhotoX A view of the berm along their Western Perimeter along Jefferson. Please note that the berm is significantly lower that 20-25 feet. Are they not as concerned about the future noise level along 6-lane Jefferson Avenue? Apparently not, they are obviously more concerned about the roof tops and palm tree tops of PGA West. It is apparent that the planning commission passed this variance because it was aesthetically pleasing and increased the value of the property of Country Club of the Desert. They did not consider the aesthetics or the value of the real-estate of the existing LaQuinta residents at PGA West. We would like to request that this entire matter be sent back to Staff and then brought to the City Counsel for proper disposition. Thank you for your time and consideration. l Wayne A. LeBlang on behalf of the property owners of PGA West M Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 VI. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Tract MaI22.9894; a request of Country Club of the Desert for a deviation from the Public Works Department approved mass grading plan for the property located on the north side of Avenue 54 between Jefferson Street and Madison Street. 1. Chairman Robbins asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Robbins asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to clarify Attachment 1 as to whether or not it had been approved by Council. Staff stated the design details for the perimeter landscaping were conceptual when approved and the height of the berm was not defined until the mass grading plan was submitted. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to clarify what the Code required in regard to the wall, sidewalk, and height. Staff did so. 3. Chairman Robbins asked if there was a wall proposed. Staff stated it is proposed to be set back a distance ranging 15 to 25 feet along Avenue 54. Chairman Robbins questioned the 3:1 slope behind the wall. 4. Commissioner Butler asked how this occurred without staff knowing it. Staff stated that since they have not completed the grading there was no need to inspect it. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated that for any project other than a golf course, the pad elevations would be defined and they would have to grade to that plan. During the course of grading for a golf course, the City's inspectors do not check detailed elevations and the developer grades at their own risk. At the completion of the grading they are required to submit a certificate to the City certifying that the grading was completed to the approved plans. In this instance, there is no doubt they have deviated from the approved plan. 5. Commissioner Kirk reviewed the approval process and asked why it was now before the Commission. Staff clarified that when the wall plans were submitted for approval, the grading issue was brought to staff's attention. Commissioner Kirk asked if Staff had a recommendation. Staff stated they did not. 1 I 002, G:\WPDOCS\PC5.22-01.wpd 2 J Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 6. Chairman Robbins stated it appears the golf course is 20+ feet below the street so the golf course is in a 40 foot hole below the top of the berm. 7. Commissioner Butler asked if there were any City codes that would allow this type of berm to be approved. Staff stated there are some issues in regard to this because in some instances a noise issue may require a higher berms than normal, such as in the case of Rancho La Quinta and Lake La Quinta. Commissioner Butler stated he did not entirely object to the berm. 8. Commissioner Abels asked what the height of the berm would be at its highest point with the wall on top. Staff stated the wall will not be on the top of the berm. It will be near the bottom and six feet in height. 9. Commissioner Tyler asked if there was a site plan for the interior of the project. Staff stated the applicant would address this. 10. Chairman Robbins asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Ms. Nancy Aaronson, representing Country Club of the Desert, stated they are trying to find a location for excess dirt on the site. They are trying to balance the dirt out over the entire project. Aesthetically from inside the project the berming is essential to protect the value of the project. They had two different grading plans approved for their project. One was the right of way and the other was for the golf course. Steve Garcia, landscape architect for the project, showed photographs that had been taken of the site. The dirt is stockpiled and will be sculptured at a later date. Within the right of way they have maintained the 3:1 slope with a meandering sidewalk. The wall is set back to be no closer than 15 feet from the right of way. Discussion followed as to the landscaping materials that would be used and the grading elevations on both sides of the berm. 11. Chairman Robbins asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Kirk asked if the Specific Plan required the landscaping to match the other side of Avenue 54. Staff stated yes. Mr. Garcia stated their plans calls for a maximum 30% turf in the perimeter right of way area. 12. Commissioner Butler asked what type of vegetation would be used on the berm. Mr. Garcia stated desert perennials and drought tolerant shrubs. 20 003 G:\WPD0CS\PC5-22-01.wpd 3 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 13. Commissioner Tyler stated there would be a fantastic view to the south, but the height of the berm would mask the view of the mountains. Mr. Garcia stated the reason for the height was to hide the view of roof tops at PGA West.. 14. Commissioner Kirk asked at what point they were viewing the south view. Mr. Garcia stated at the end of the residential cul-de- sacs. 15. There being no further discussion, it was before the Commission for discussion. 16. Commissioner Kirk stated he believes the applicant has made a point in that if houses were built there it would be a hardscape and this softscape is a relief. His concern is that they do not know how the berm will be sculptured. If there is to be no more dirt to be added he would have no objection. 17. Commissioner Abels stated it was a nice presentation and he would have no objections. 18. Commissioner Butler stated he likes the concept of buffering the golf course from the street. He supports the project. 19. Commissioner Tyler stated that driving by presently it is like driving through the Grand Canyon. There has been a lot of concern voiced by the residents of PGA West. He had strong objections and after the presentation his opinion is somewhat tempered. 20. Chairman Robbins stated he too was concerned after driving by, but after hearing the presentation and the intent of the applicant, he does like the concept. 21. Commissioner Tyler asked if this concept would be carried all the way down Avenue 54. Ms. Aaronson stated yes. 22. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Butler to adopt Minute Motion 2001-011 approving the deviation to the approved mass grading plan for Tract Map 29894. Unanimously approved. 21 004 G:\ W PDOCS\PC5-22-01. wpd 4 v 22 T 23 �,� �\���; ;. � . .�►.� _� _._. _. .� --_ afe�■ f:l:' 11111157:3f f ■ ■ f1 .,. ,, ., a e >ro .g .v. ..,..... � _... y YMCA We build strong kids, strong families, strong communities. You are invited to: Camp Oakes VIP Day Cost: It's Free Tour Director: Rob Ballew Date: Friday, June 291h Departure: Leave the YMCA 10:00am Return: Back at YMCA 10:30pm Transportation: YMCA Vans 3;aiP M, Trip would include a box lunch, trip to Camp Oakes in the cool forest of the Big Bear area, dinner, a tour of camp and a very special campfire. Over 180 kids are part of this sold out camp! The camp staff are all volunteers from our YMCA. We have raised almost all of our goal of $15,000 for our Send a Kid to Camp program and we have several great kids attending this life changing camp because of donations to this program. Please RSVP to Tori at the YMCA 341-9622 by Wednesday, June 27`h at noon. 2) FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT 43-930 San Pable Ave. Palm Desert. CA 92260 end a kid to camp\Camp Oakes -bId"aCPax (760) 779-9651 uhued way To put judeo-Christian principles into practice through programs that of the Desert build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE ITEM: Cv��11 Fizends of the La Quinta Senior Center 6, 05V Board Members MEMORANDUM Robert Alca/a President Fred Mosher 1st Vice President Richard Dahl Treasurer Salle Redewill TO: City of La Quinta Council Members Secretary Dane Hooper Board Member FROM: Robert Alcala, President Joan Forest Board Member DATE: May 16, 2001 Regina Smith Board Member SUBJECT: Art In Public Places In keeping with the City of La Quinta's program, "Art in Public Places," we would like you to consider a mural painting being done at the Senior Center. The perfect place would be the back of the stage and would serve as a back -drop for the many programs presented there. In looking into this possibility, we have contacted the La Quinta Arts Foundation regarding a known muralist and they have recommended a local artist. The Foundation was also very interested in this project and suggested that we use some of our talented local high school students to work with the artist on this project. We look forward to your consideration and comments on this project at your earliest convenience. 2E PO Box 1504 - La Quinta, CA 92253 Tar Exempt 1.D. #33-0261511 WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE ITEM: C�— June 4, 2001 John Pena Mayor City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena: Cathedral City Indian Wells Riverside County to Quinta A Public Agency cec� Now that the events and memorials in honor of fallen Veterans have ended and the biannual rise of patriotism has mellowed to a low buzz, it is time to turn our attentions to the surviving Veterans, as they have a need for your support year round. I am referring to the Vets Express transportation program that is operated by SunLine Transit Agency and funded in part by Regional Access Project (RAP) and Desert Healthcare District. Vets Express provides a much -needed service Monday -Friday to the Loma Linda Veterans Hospital at a cost of approximately $104,000 per year. RAP provided funding for the first 6 months of operations and we had applied for an additional $50,000 from Desert Healthcare District. There were some delays in processing of the grant and approvals due to the amount being requested and the intricacies of purchasing the new vehicle. This was further complicated by a misunderstanding between the grantees and SunLine Transit Agency, resulting in a shortfall in payment less than the cost of operations. Due in large part to this shortfall, we were faced with issuing notice of temporary stoppage of the service for the month of June. Fortunately, Mayor Will Kleindienst was able to encourage a private donor to give $10,000 that has afforded us the ability to continue the service without interruption. As mentioned at the board meeting of May 30, 2001, your financial support to recover as much of the shortfall for this fiscal year, approximately $28,000, is the primary purpose of this correspondence. Partial funding for next year has already been secured and a meeting of all partners relevant to the Vets Express has been invited to attend on June 7, 2001 at 3:00pm here at SunLine to discuss current funding, operations, and develop a plan for long term operation with financial stability. Should your schedules permit we welcome you and/or your staffs participation. 27 32-505 Horry Oliver Trail, Thousand Palms. California 92276 Phone 760-343-3456 Fax 760-343-3845 Vets Express Page 2 Thank you in advance for you consideration of our plea for assistance with this most important program. Any financial support you can lend to this cause is another opportunity to show your appreciation, as are we, for all the Veterans have done to gaining and maintaining basic freedoms for Americans and so many others around the world. Sincerely, Cynthia J. C i r Manager, Education and Social Service Programs cc: Richard Cromwell, III enclosures 28 VETS EXPRESS OPERATIONS BUDGET OVERVIEW FY 2001 Vets Express total operations cost: RAP Grant fiscal year 2001: Desert Healthcare District Grant fiscal year 2001: Private Donation (Mayor Kleindienst) Total outstanding for FY 2001: $104,000 -$50,000 -$16,000 10 000 $28,000 29 QI�vv�N W F T�4 4 OF AGENDA rt9w� AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Demand Register Dated June 19, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: Approve Demand Register Dated June 19, 2001 BACKGROUND: Prepaid Warrants: BUSINESS SESSION CONSENT CALENDAR STUDY SESSION PUBLIC HEARING 45660 - 45580} 1,550.00 45581-45583} 32,955.86 45584 - 455961 69,945.08 45597 - 456031 13,555.12 Wire Transfers} 24,093.66 P/R 7017 - 7092} 96,608.12 P/R Tax Transfers} 27,218.44 CITY DEMANDS Payable Warrants: 45604 - 45715} 2,690,779.57 RDA DEMANDS $2,956,705.85 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Demand of Cash - City $2,251,639.11 $2,251,639.11 705,066.74 $2,956,705.85 30 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK TRANSACTIONS 5/31/01 - 6/12/01 6/8/01 WIRE TRANSFER - DEFERRED COMP $6,106.03 6/8/01 WIRE TRANSFER -PERS $11,441.63 618/01 WIRE TRANSFER -CREDIT UNION $5,546.00 6/8/01 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $1 000.00 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT $24,093.66 31 002 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 3:55PM 06/12/01 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 45604 06/12/01 &01431 LA QUINTA VIDEO & PAGING 1.50 45605 06/12/01 &01432 MOORE ELECTRICAL CONT 50.00 45606 06/12/01 &01433 OAKDALE SHELL 36.00 45607 06/12/01 &01434 PAZ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 128.74 45608 06/12/01 &01435 M R SOMERS CONSTRUCTION 25.00 45609 06/12/01 &01436 VACATION POOLS 29.70 45610 06/12/01 &01438 RON MILLER 30.00 45611 06/12/01 AAA100 AAA SEASONS 2030.00 45612 06/12/01 ABL001 ABLE RIBBON TECH 338.97 45613 06/12/01 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 290.20 45614 06/12/01 AIK100 PATRICIA AIKEN DBA BROKEN 210.00 45615 06/12/01 ALC050 BOB ALCALA 52.50 45616 06/12/01 ALL200 ANN ALLMAN 134.40 45617 06/12/01 ARC100 ARCH 541.98 45618 06/12/01 ASC001 A & S COFFEE SERVICE 112.00 45619 06/12/01 AUT030 AUTOMATED TELECOM 64.34 45620 06/12/01 BANO15 DAVE BANG ASSOCIATES INC 6209.33 45621 06/12/01 BER125 BERG & ASSOCIATES INC 120162.09 45622 06/12/01 BES101 BEST BUY 42.98 45623 06/12/01 BOG100 SHARON BOGAN 33.60 45624 06/12/01 BOY075 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF 14170.00 45625 06/12/01 BRA150 JOHN BRANSTETTER 600.00 45626 06/12/01 CADO10 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 283.59 45627 06/12/01 CAP050 ROSMARY CAPUTO 196.00 45628 06/12/01 CDI100 CDI COMMUNICATIONS INC 179.99 45629 06/12/01 CEN050 CENTURY CROWELL 260.00 45630 06/12/01 CHA100 CHAPMAN GOLF DEV 2000.00 45631 06/12/01 CIT025 CITICORP VENDOR FINANCE 1676.51 45632 06/12/01 COM015 COMPUTER U LEARNING CENTR 168.75 45633 06/12/01 CONO10 CONRAD & ASSOCIATES 4725.00 45634 06/12/01 DAL100 DALLAS MIDWEST CO 421.03 45635 06/12/01 DAN200 DANONE WATERS OF NORTH 16.00 45636 06/12/01 DENO10 DENBOER ENGINEERING AND 4860.00 45637 06/12/01 DES051 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHL 655069.35 45638 06/12/01 DES052 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED 816.00 45639 06/12/01 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC 6841.50 45640 06/12/01 DLO100 DLO ENTERPRISES INC DBA 2625.92 45641 06/12/01 DOU010 DOUBLE PRINTS 1 HR PHOTO 86.81 45642 06/12/01 DOU200 LES DOUGLAS 409.50 45643 06/12/01 EXP200 EXPRESS DETAIL 1300.00 45644 06/12/01 FAL050 JOHN FALCONER 1259.18 45645 06/12/01 FIR005 FIRELINE FIRE EQUIPMENT 366.53 45646 06/12/01 GAB050 GABRIEL'S WROUGHT IRON 4275.00 45647 06/12/01 GEN100 THOMAS P GENOVESE 35.00 45648 06/12/01 GRA007 GRAINGER 696.23 45649 06/12/01 GRA010 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO 1311898.73 45650 06/12/01 HEG050 JIM HEGGE 840.00 32 fl-D 3 PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 3:55PM 06/12/01 ,kCCOUNTS ITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 2 HECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT VUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT 45651 06/12/01 HIM100 DAVID L HIMMLER 658.00 45652 06/12/01 HOA010 HUGH HOARD INC 140.00 45653 06/12/01 HOM030 HOME DEPOT 107.44 45654 06/12/01 H00050 FAYE HOOPER 169.16 45655 06/12/01 IND030 INDIO SHOE STORE INC 275.86 45656 06/12/01 JAC150 STEVEN JACOBS 115.50 45657 06/12/01 JAC175 JACOBSEN HARDY GOLF 14637.48 45658 06/12/01 JAS100 JAS PACIFIC 16376.34 45659 06/12/01 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 11460.67 45660 06/12/01 KRI100 BRUCE KRIBBS CONSTRUCTION 6120.00 45661 06/12/01 LAQ030 LA QUINTA CAR WASH 19.90 45662 06/12/01 LES020 JANELLE LESLIE 6.30 45663 06/12/01 LOW100 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC 50.47 45664 06/12/01 LUN050 LUNDEEN PACIFIC CORP 41326.94 45665 06/12/01 MCDO10 MC DOWELL AWARDS 30.05 45666 06/12/01 MEE100 WAYNE MEEDS 100.00 45667 06/12/01 MOM100 MOM'S GAS STATION 1315.48 45668 06/12/01 MUN010 MUNI FINANCIAL SERV INC 3618.31 45669 06/12/01 NAT022 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 1177.00 45670 06/12/01 NAW010 RON NAWROCKI 2400.00 45671 06/12/01 NEX010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 2099.05 45672 06/12/01 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 5385.00 45673 06/12/01 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 145.30 45674 06/12/01 OLI100 OLINN MESSAGE CENTER 100.44 45675 06/12/01 OUT100 OUTDOOR SERVICES INC 200.00 45676 06/12/01 OWE020 OWEN & BRADLEY 52.50 45677 06/12/01 PET200 P F PETTIBONE & CO 296.20 45678 06/12/01 PIT100 NOEL PITTMAN 95.20 45679 06/12/01 PRI020 THE PRINTING PLACE 940.80 45680 06/12/01 PROO10 PROTECTON SERVICE IND 248.04 45681 06/12/01 PSI050 PSI ENVIRON GEOTECH CONS 6603.00 45682 06/12/01 RAL050 RALPHS GROCERY CO 22.34 45683 06/12/01 RAS020 RASA - ERIC NELSON 7420.00 45684 06/12/01 REG041 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY 101.48 45685 06/12/01 REL100 RELIANT FUND-RAISING 180.69 45686 06/12/01 RES005 RESERVE ACCOUNT 4000.00 45687 06/12/01 RIV020 RIV CNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLR 337.00 45688 06/12/01 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS 271156.80 45689 06/12/01 RIV101 RIV COUNTY SHERIFF/INDIO 1968.25 45690 06/12/01 RIV130 RIVERSIDE CNTY PURCHASING 63.80 45691 06/12/01 RUT050 RUTAN & TUCKER 55513.12 45692 06/12/01 SAX100 SAXON ENGINEERING SERVICE 3670.00 45693 06/12/01 SCR100 SCREENLAND GRAPHICS CO 82.78 45694 06/12/01 SECO30 SECURITY LINK/AMERITECH 108.21 45695 06/12/01 SHAO10 SHADOW PALMS GARDENING 150.00 45696 06/12/01 SKY200 SKYTEL 15.21 45697 06/12/01 SMA010 SMART & FINAL 192.23 45698 06/12/01 SMI150 MALCOLM SMITH MOTORSPORTS 271.53 45699 06/12/01 SOU007 SOUTHWEST NETWORKS, INC 412.50 33 004 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CITY OF LA QUINTA CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 45700 06/12/01 45701 06/12/01 45702 06/12/01 45703 06/12/01 45704 06/12/01 45705 06/12/01 45706 06/12/01 45707 06/12/01 45708 06/12/01 45709 06/12/01 45710 06/12/01 45711 06/12/01 45712 06/12/01 45713 06/12/01 45714 06/12/01 45715 06/12/01 CHECK REGISTER BANK ID: DEF NO STA050 SUN075 TER100 TOP010 TRIO10 TRI100 TRU010 TTI100 USO100 VID050 VON010 WAR025 WES020 WIN010 W00100 YOU100 VENDOR NAME 3:55PM 06/12/01 PAGE 3 STAPLES SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY TERRA NOVA PLANNING & TOPS'N BARRICADES INC TRI LAKE CONSULTANTS INC TRI STATE LAND SURVEYORS TRULY NOLEN INC TTI NATIONAL INC US OFFICE PRODUCTS VIDEO DEPOT VON'S C/O SAFEWAY INC WILLIAM WARE WEST GROUP WINSTON TIRES DEBBIE WOODRUFF YOUNG ENGINEERING SERVICE CHECK TOTAL PAYMENT AMOUNT 1263.39 263.25 8150.39 1810.14 30037.00 22305.00 72.00 7.83 1583.60 18.75 23.96 11250.00 64.30 663.18 295.24 4235.00 2,690,779.57 34 005 a O F Z O N m m m F F F F F F F F F F F £ 4 m F F E a a N E .yJ Q a 0 0 O O O r 0 Op O� o 4] 41 �l1 fil t+1 a N 41 N � N O m m N H ti F t❑.� t❑] rUi E rUi £ a m a w a m E F F m m F F E F Z F M F ZY F O U O H O U O m m 0 m m 0 4l p O O f ❑ F m F ❑ E Q a E 4] 4] F Z F �� O F m F O m E ❑ m -^ a O a a s a w w y a O m F a m m m F a m a m a 19 a m a x a m a U U M O> z S S ❑ 0❑ ❑ S ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ z 8 .❑. a O C ❑ ❑ ❑ a a � a w a a a y � � � rz.> > ryi � � � � � m � � � uyi .y, o a> s a a s F F m o m m m m a a a m w a+ m m r p N yI Z£ Y1 x 4 a Q m m m a i o o w 0 o m m o N o 0 0 O O O O N N O O O O O m O O O O O O O O ti m m m m y iv �c r r r r r e o e a e e e m p o O o 0 Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ry N N O Z Z ? � O O a m o U a p a y E U U F F Q ❑ a a u u o m m Z Z a a z O O m m 3 3 3 Q fil m ❑❑❑ 41 a F z Q y la.] Z a s m m QI m Q d N a U y Z g g a s W 4] 41 Q p p Z O U U U 35 006 O 1 E Z 0 \ .N. \ N S r r O W F £ Q m E F F F F E F F E F F F F F F F pl W N M O m t+t F O ✓1 � O O I�1 m �() CD O� 1� � w Z 0 `n � ✓1 �O O� N v N .y v P it N 0 0 o a m o m m m N o in m o m o 1p O N F F F F F~ It a a a a a a z a < a ❑ Z F F E F F .� .] E F w E Z Z Z Z Z F a O O O O O O m m 0 O £ O O p 0 0 0 a W F a F a F a E F d W F F W a F p U O F O O O U U O J `+ w F F F F F Y a F a E a F a >> a w w a w a O m a u u o 0 o a F O O U O U O V O w w O O a 0 O F p 0❑> 0 0 0 w > a ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ w w❑ w❑ w W❑ a a a a a❑ z z o z a z a z a z a a z w w z 0 z z E F F E E z a F w w F w F w F w w w w W W w a w Y❑ w w w w w w w w w > w> w> w> p V> W W> a> a 0> Z Z Z Z y> S ❑ Z 4 Q O O x Q O 0 0 0 0 0 F w rZi ry. ¢ m U U V d 3 U U U U U w U W rn N �o F ❑ a m � � Z Z £ ❑ � N r'i n m o m m c p y 10 Y f+l Y 10 .y lG •+ lG O N .y N .y r r r m N m .+ F Y a z m a m w m a i o o W E a N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O w O m m O O O O O O O m O O O O �O £ Z o 0 o m m o o N ✓1 N o 0 0 0 0 0 F O N N N •+ ti •+ ti �'1 C N �O �O �O �O �O ('1 U 0 o O o 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 y w U U Y Z Z O F m W W w w Z Z Z Z Z O m >> £ Q a N N VI N N o ❑ a s o w w w w w Ott w w U u u F F F F F w w a Q a M Q q w a w w V U U U 0 0 0 0 0 a a a z W W w w w w w w F .] W W ❑ w w w w w a z a a o o W z z z z a a a a a r a s F m z ,a b F > a a a a a w a a O z z a z> ❑ a s W W W W W W w Z a m Q Q 4 Q Q Q ❑❑ m m m m m m F W w y p N N N N N O O N O N O O O O O N H O H Y U .l U U U U F Z Z a a a a a w a u a a a a s a s a m m m m m m m m 36 007 2 ti O N ti .y ti m V ✓) b r � m .y N F( N N N N N N N N N a O E Z p N o g q m E F F F E F E F F F F F F F F d d N m O O ✓` m m m O O� O O + O m o 0 0 Z E b m m r o m O pl O OI O O N m O a O m tD O� Q O O b F b N d w N a > 'Sd m y y m a U Q O w w w w a a w a z 4 a a F F OU E O F F a F w 0 FFO a0 O a OF j O .O. OE a o O x a O a 0 m g u o a o z o £££££ o u o a o o w o u o u > a ❑ a ❑ ❑ a a a a a a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ z u z a z a z z z o 0 0 0 0 o z a z d z z z z X z a m w E w O w a w w w w w w w w F w w ❑ w a w O w F w > 4I > x > w > .-i ti .r .-i r� H > m > H > w > a > > Z z Z Z z F w 4 m O rzi vUi U 0 0❑ O '> > Z a 3 X w N O U w w m o .. ❑ a b o w a o o m m r o O 1 > m a. m m N N P N ~ ❑ "" z � in �n �n �n �n U F X F y a z d a m w m a 1 0 o d o 0 0 0 0 o m o m m o m O m r m r r N r r r rn m m �n K Jl ill c P v � ✓1 ifl O N O O N p N N m m m m N O r N aO O O O O O O O O a F w Z d a 1 a a s m � y Z a u a m 1r O U m a a �a >� m E w F �' m 2 n a d ££££££ a o � ❑❑❑ u a d a 0 H�� z u a d a 0 z u a d a 0 z O❑❑ a u a d a 0 w� z a u a d a o z a u F O d a N a qq N o a U H w Q z O o u w 3 o a a Z w u tY a o Z Q s u Z ? ❑ Z w > d O H u U z w a ❑ a F i o u F fu z O w > o O h O ul O .4 u O ti a u O ry a u O .4 a u O rl a u O .y u ✓1 u O u JI u O u N u u 37 11: Q n m rl m a O F Z 0 N \ x m m m m m m m m m E E F F F F F F F F F F F £ q m E F E F d d N O O O m O O O N O O O N ti m O O O O tl O O O th O m O N O ✓1 �b m 10 O� � Z H N o w z £ 7 N O Q d � N ID N N m a V ti l0 N e. N e d F YI � p. O N IO s a E a a p o 4 a a a a a s a Z F ry M H F F F F a F \ F w F U U U U U U U U F w F O O \\ O Q O Q O w 0 0 0 m 0 > > > > > > > > O U O W H E b ID E Z F 3 F � F O F O F �/I U1 Vl N U1 m VI m E O F U a d a M O d a O W >+ w a a� O a U O a z Z O N a O d a a s H a O ❑ F u F U F u F q u F u F u F u F u O a Z O w WOy > a ❑ O Z❑ ❑ Y ❑ o O Z a x Z Z a a a 0.' a a s z z () N M z Z Z w £ w w N w E E H F E F F H w w W F m w W w N > 3> ❑> U> z Z Z y Z Z Z Z> ❑> O W > p❑> z > a O Z a 0 0 - O S m p 0 Q 0 a q x ❑ a N d u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u d O C N N YI ��� ✓) N p III (1 w r �+ X 4 Z d 4 m w m a I o o d N o Q o 0 o rl m rl r+ m m r� m o w m N N N O m O O O �(I ✓1 �(1 ✓1 ul ul N N m j�(1 O c m N N � � Jl N Jl ✓1 OI ✓1 � I'1 r N ti O O O O O O O O O y O O O O E m c f'1 + ti ti N ti� N ti N Q ti .y N e O� m N rl N c N I'1 N N c f'1 V ifl N r-I -I fl rl ti rl H fl O v O O O O O O O 0 0 O O q O O O O x U 4 5 Z N p O 38 AM KF Z 0 ti g Q m F F F E F H F F H F F E F E H F F F a a N m m E m N itl O o O o �O � �!t o O r O o r r , m Z w F Z m r � u1 O ul O m m P r �O m N c �l1 �(1 m �I1 ✓t � m N a m 0 o m m o o m P m w N m m U I N N lO b P a c� O Z a m a F � VI w 0 > z .. Z 0 a' a U w w p 0 H O a q F 0 F a o m z o z F w O> s a F V O a F m> H Q F 0 F a o z z w E Z 4 w a . w >>> F Z 4 w a N w F 4 Z F o gq F a w o a❑ N z w > w t^ z O H a H a>> m p a d w a w a a F a w a❑ w a> a E a Q E w F o a o F F a a o w o U YZ z z w > w a> w m > a O 0 u o E w a a g 4 z F w m> w a V a M F E H w a s o ❑ x z V w z> p a w w a a p VI a O a 0❑ E V1 m a w UI w w a a p Ul w w a m> m N Q F Z 0 0 F a u o ❑ m a z F w m Z O V w w U w O > Z p ❑ Z£ w O Z m 01 ill N N 01 N m O m m O ('1 nl .y O m N ti O r O �O r p .y m O O� m p r O O �O r O m Q Z 6� q m w m a I o o w E a m m N Ol Ol O� o o O m o O r O r r r m w N N O1 O O O O O N O N N N ul m m m Rl IO l0 �O O O O tO O O m O m m m N a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 F Z N N N ti ti ti F O r � N P P P P P �Il U q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O m O a Z E z a OU z a a a a a 0 > a N F F Q q 4 fal 0 4a1 C K Z I Z Z N F F H Z Z Z 3 w Z q H Q w w w O O O w F A z m a s a p❑ m m O m V a U a V m U q a. a q qq °i r] a 0 a m 0 s m 0 ❑ w w a x w a x w a x z 0 z 0 z 0 a w a qZ z z a z z a z z Q a z Q F QzQ m Z ❑ p a w w w 7 '� '� w O E ti t� (� t� U O F w w Z O > o .. 0 .y 0 O 0 O 0 o 0 O 0 in 0 0 ul o o N 0 o r 0 r 0 r o r O r o o 0 N O O N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O u F u o 0 o o a x m x a x a a s a .a a a m a z w a c Ka aa. aa' aa. aa' a u S g ❑ w w w w w w � c� o � u c� c� u u F LI 1 F z f O .N+ O 4 m m m �o O m IO m m IO m Io IO �o IO £ 4 m F F E F f F F E F F F F f F F d d N m O N O O O O O m 10 O m a O N m F o I O O O m ul m O w y O O O m O O r Ill O N r � O N a Td o m o In d r N fl m m o 0 0 o m m o m c r o 0 o m In m m o o m In In r �o m F u1 O IO r m r m S m �O •-I .y .� N .� � � n a z w u a m m a a s a a m a m a a a rmi a a a a a a a a w¢ w a a a ❑ a a Z Z Z F F F d d F f F m F F F >> F O 0 0 0 Q O O w w 0 m m 0 a 0 F O m O w 0 U V O w F a F m F C C F a F d d E O F 5 F m F UI N E z O F E F 4. O F O d O O 5 d U U K C E C ❑❑ d C F O x m m E C O d' E F m N O > I-+ m o m 0 m a w U 0 m U O O O Z O Z O❑ O E w❑ O U ' m 0 ❑ O N❑ U O '.❑ ❑ O O U❑❑ U U O F Z U F F Z Q Z m Z U V 2 O Z C m Z F Z x 2 Z Z m ti w N w a w F w w O w F N w w w F w d w f F w w w ❑ z o Z> o d> w m> z C C> 2> a N w > d> a 0 > z a> o Z 0 Z> 0 > ❑ N U U s 4 Q m z m m F V U U a w d U w N N C I I m O❑ > w r o r y ❑ L.i p c v �O l0 �I1 �D r r N m ❑ m m m .. m m E L 4 Z d a m w m m I O O d F z m m o N o 0 o N o r N o y r N w Ifl I(1 O O O S O N OI O m e N m If1 ✓1 O Ifl O 10 O I(1 O m I(1 O N I(1 m ^a m Oi rl O� .-I OI ifl OI m m OI N O ul m y O O N O N O O O O O O O\ O O E y 10 m r m r N N N N m m N C v N o In In o I N OI m m m 0 Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z z O O m U V H W O O Z 4 m a o o U U w U 4 L C C w U U O )+ a H H y m a 4a7 Z 2 N m m O a H N a o O ❑❑ E w w w u x rU-I O a d o i z 8 o w o m w u u o a❑ f f w x x ❑ x x z m a s >. a .. .. x ❑ o w m d d a a a z z x x w w w > o w d S a >a o a s z F a a s y O h ❑ x x S d d .+ m h h h Y' z O > O O O O O O ❑ O O O O V1 O O O 40 O In o .+ m In In m In r o 0 0 o 'a. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. .. o f �a a u0i 0 0 o S g z a a w ¢ w a z z Oil •[ ry n n n N \O �O �D �O �D �O r r N N 6� O F Z O N � r x L Q m F F F F F F F E F E F F F F F F F d d N m r 01 o N o e m o 0 o t1 F m ut o m O 0 1 O N O �+ O �O O N v Jl n1 n f1 It a e r o 0 0 r o m m o m m m o 0 Al n n1 P Z U U FY Y m Q Z a a w a F m 0££ a a a a a Z a 0 a a m a F 4 4 a F a 4 a �+ Q ❑ a a m a m Z E>> F d F Z F F F F Q F F N F O V V o m m o m 0 O O O O m 0 O Q O z z Zi F a F F F E E F F F U E ri H Ii O❑❑ £ O m m O O a O E n m m � d F F 0 Z O m O U O m O 4 0 4 o U O O O > a F F Z F F ££❑ F❑ a ❑ O .+ ❑ U❑ Z❑ D❑ d❑ a] a1 izi h La] w a f 4 H Z Z w m w rZ.] F �+z] a w 0 w Z w F w m > > F > > ❑ O O > > x > m > d > Z > c� > to > m > V ❑ ❑❑ m❑❑ m U U .U. m z O 4 z > O (V W V b I O a o Z Z£ m m r r I M❑ Fi O N N n f1 n N N N CI > O !'1 �O ❑ n .y n n n n .i n a £ O �O (�1 � N �+ Y Q Z a a m m m a 1 0 o m F 41 N N N N N N N N P P O� O O O T v O m m m m m m m m m m lO Jl O O O ill �p O � r� rvi �n �n rl ri m rl ri m m �n rn r rn m r F z �n m m m m m N �n o n N r ry ry o ❑ m .. .-� ..� .+ .+ m m P �n N m e e N �n o U ¢ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O F Z m m m m m m m m z a > N > > m > > > > > > E x o a o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ m vi U Z m o a a a a a a a a z a y m o m in O 3 m ❑ H m m m m m m m m m a a Q 3 F E 1 N m m m m N m UI m U m d U Q N m U a m E ❑❑❑8888❑ 0 0 0 0 m a m a £ o a a a ❑ m N a z o 0 0 o m z m £ U N a a a a a a a a a m 0 a m o m m Q a m m m m m m m m u a m m ❑ ❑ z qq H H H H H z H? a a a O j F� z 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O o O 'J O O O O O O O O O n N O O N n n n n n n n O O n O O n O O F Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z a m 3 Z ❑ m £ Z u .. .+ .. .. .. .. .. .. a a m o ❑ u m o 0 41 012 Z P Ifl ID r m 01 t 1 N rl P N m r m m❑ .-1 N m P 1(1 ID r P Q N •+ F ., H H F H "^ ti N N N N N N N N N dF' O Z 0 .Ni m IO x U N N N N N m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m O 4] �0 U' Q ID m 10 �0 �O ID 10 10 �O m 1D 10 10 10 m �p 1O \O m 10 10 ID �O 10 £ Q m E F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F E F F F F d d N m N .y N !"1 Ol m O O ✓1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m m F r o m r 10 m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z F v m £ z O r o N m r o O N r N 1 O 0 r 0 r 0 1 0 N 0 r 0 r 0 ID 0 r 0 P r N p P 0 m a Q O O O t+t O O 0 O O m r o m r o m a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a m O Q a a a a a a a a a a Q a a Q M U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U ✓1 H H H H H izi Z Z Z Z Z z Z z Z z z z Z Z z U pp p p p p > U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Q Q Q a Q Q N 4l 41 fil 41 41 4] 41 4] 41 4] 41 41 4] 41 41 F F F F F F E F F F F F F F\ F F F F E E a a a fil a a m m m m m m m a Q Q Z a F E F F F F F F F F F F F F F a f0 Z F F F F O E Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z F p 41 F m F F a F u V V u p (9 V V V O V V U u u F H d x a S a a a s a F O H N N£ N£ O m 0 O Q O F F F F F F E F E F F F F F E O a > a ❑ a❑ ❑ a❑ u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u❑ 4 Z U a a a a a a Z Z Z J Z 41 41 41 L] 41 fJ 41 41 fil 1.1 I+1 til 41 41 (il Z U H m a a a a a a> m (➢ z Z> a> 0> t0 U U U V U U> > £> t7 > a> O 0 O 0 0 O O 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 O 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O> ❑ o 0 0 0 0 o m ril a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a m a a a a a a £ m u m a m a a m m m a m m a m a m w m w ., ❑ a u1 10 10 u 10 l0 10 m 10 10 ID m 1O 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z£ D• m D• m m 0` O N T O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N H❑ ❑ .. .+ .+ o r �n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z N N N N N N O r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m ❑ N N N N N N N 1O rl N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O H Y Q Z d Q m L] m a I O O to F O O O O O N O O O O O O O O fil O O O O O O O O O O m O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O vl 10 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m £ O r r r r r r m m Jl ill ill N P� N ✓1 ✓1 m 2 �0 10 �0 10 m �o o r1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N �D l0 l0 ID 10 �D �0 IO m l0 �0 01 10 10 10 10 10 10 r F '.L O O O O O O N rl N N I r O N P !1 m N /'1 N N 10 m m ❑ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O U U u1 O N O� O Q rl N N t+l rv1 P O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r r r r r r ti P rl P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P rl m z z z z z z M H M I-1 M N IF -I m U U U U U V U U U U u U u U U U Z Z z Z Z zH z > H H Iz-I H z z z z z m m a z> z 0 41 fl 41 4l [.] W O E U u U ttJJ u u U u U u u u U u O m m m m m m 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u d a a a a a a H N N V] N m N m N m N V! m N N m 0 a H z a a a a a a a a a a a a a Q a E I U U U V U U a z z z z z z a u £ a u1 F Q Q Q Q Q Q 0 0 Z z Z z z z z z z z z z z z z w a z z z z z z z a a u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ m F F Q 3 m m m m In m m U1 m VI m m m m U1 a a F H H H F Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Q O Z Z Z Z Z Z F Z X U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U � r7 ❑ O O O' O O Q O til �-I m Z ££££££ 2 a Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 0 F� Z O > O O O O O O N O O N ti ti 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 O N O O O O O O O O O O O F Z Z Z Z Z_ Z F 3 X U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U � V H 0 0 a 4 ui H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H Q U ££££££ 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 0 42 013 a f o z 0 � Ip m x U m m N m N N O N C N N N N F N F N F O F £ Q m F F F F F F F F F F F F m N G. m m f In O r O o O 0 O � N N N ifl O O o O 0 O e r'1 o O w �' Z '•j m P rt N O O O O O O N U1 b N ✓1 � N 1'1 N r m m P OI r N N N O r Q w £ a O N P P O O O O O m O O Pl Z O N N W M 01 N d H 3 w � �' Z a s ❑ � h a O Q Z 2 4 W U 4 > U 4 Q d F N N£ C 4 4 4 z 4 > y O F O m F F O Q F 4 0 m F Q O E Y O F O y Q w O F w 0 F O F O 4 F m 0 N w U F z E Ou ££ E U E 00 E O F O U w F u F H N F F Uf K 3 E w m U w >0 G y N m w 0 m Z z m 0 > m m m m S a f ❑ m 2 > m N S F S U N ❑ rl a S Q E a F z S a z w a F z j m z m G 3 z £ z F S z > m Z V UI a w z m W a w w Z Z w a w ❑ w F W ❑ w ❑ i w > m w a > a a w > W w F > Z a w ❑ m O m > O > Z ❑ 0 o > 0 0 > W z > m > Z z Q m O U a 0 0 rZ-i a V > p m in in r e r m z Z £ O O N ❑� Y N ti O O O N N ry < a m z a m w m i m o o F W w O O m O O O O O � O O m IO O O O N m s O O to O P 0 rn O rn O m O r Nl m O E Z N .v 1'1 P P O ti N N N 1'1 N o fl r O r P o N In O f rl f"I e P O N N f'1 m (h .4 N U Q 0 0 O O O o O O O O O O O O O Z z O N Z O m w U z V z O U U U ❑ H W U S w U x W O O O n U Z U z w U N w U 0 w U u a s .] �-+ > O O U K a p, t F r� F w u � >> w a w Z aZ U O u z w N C'1 O t� O w O Z H w Q F d w d w N VI W m Im.] N qO a m m F i F ryi F z ryi F z F 2 O m m m O m w a 4 y ❑❑ w w w £ 0 o 0 0 d LF1 m m a w C w M m d U w z w z W m sa I dr a Q O ❑ u w u L. z Z Q m .7 z O O O O O O W z F F F d m w F z '„J O w O �. w O O O O O .-1 O ti O •+ N O O N O N O N O N O ti O u1 O �l1 O Vl O N O V H rl O 0 O j O 3 W z m m a VI N iQ] Q qN a Q U 0 0 014 y o .-I m m P �n m m m m `� rmi e v c P e c e e c o •• H z 0 .N. 0 �p £ Q S U m m F m F m F m F m F m E m F m F m F m F r F N F m O F N ti F N F N F N ti E N F N .v F F F N F F d d N l+1 m F O O O O O O O O O O m O O O m O O O N O Om OP w . yj d � O O O O N O r 2 N 'J Q a m u ZO W F O F d O > C ryi N ❑ U > N X U w x u Z a U > m Y U w x u Z U > m X V w x u Z a U > m Y U w x U Z a U > m Y U w x u z a U > m X u w S u Z a U > m Y u w x U z a U > m Y u w S U Z a U > m Y U w x U z a U > m Y U w S u Z a a a E O F a 0 0 z w Z O E 6 u❑ a ❑ .-] 4 F O F a 0 Z w w w a d � a Q F O F a 0 ❑ z w F I.� £ a O W w u❑ Q F m> o a 4 F 0 F a 0 z w O E Q N U u z❑ Y a> a a Q F O F m 0 z w H Z w ww U a O W z w 3 a F Z w ££££££ W U a o W z w 3 Q F Z w w U a 0 W z w 3 a� F Z w w U a 0 W z w 3 E Z W w U a 0 W z w 3 a F Z w w U a 0 W z w 3 a F Z w W U a 0 W z w 3 a F T :J u a 0 .0 z❑ w 3> a N .] F Q F \ O F ? F m 0 O ❑ z X O� ry N N N N N N N N ZS y O .. N m .. N P .. N m .. N N .. N �o .. N m .. N m .. N N N N u+ N N r m �, O N m N Q •.• .. O •• .. O .. O •• .. O •• .. O '• .. O •• O -. O r r r r r r r r r r rn m rn m m m m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N P P P ti ~O p ~O ~0 0 ~O ~O ~O ~O p O O O O �(1 N if1 ✓1 �l) �I1 ul N N m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N l'1 ti O O ul N O 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y a N N N N m VI N f/i O W W W W W W W W O a e s a a a z a a z w u z w W w w W w W w z m I ❑ a N N N r r a. a a. E O F F E F F F F F a z z z z z z z z w S O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S F O O ❑ O O O O O O O O m Z U 0 V U U U U U U U „ m F w F a u w z z z u z � Iai Iai rai rai O O N O O O O O O O O O .y > > > > w w w 44 0l5 y N m '+ N P ✓1 lD r m Q� O 1 N m E Z O N n N 10 U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N S Q m F F F E F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F W d N m m F O m o O. Z F w Z N O r 10 m 01 O O1 O O m )O V1 m O. r ^I m H n 10 P f") O1 b O m M �(1 N r-1 N N m N m r r O m t"1 O b P .� m O 1 ✓1 N i(1 O N m e z a S m p Izi .z. rz-I m m m E n Z Z Q a a m C(' K 0 0 O 0 w Ou m ra ggS w m O H F F F F m w m m m w w w w u z U m 4 0 u IF -I p w w Q a w w w w a a a a a m m m m a o w m z >£Q F F E E a a a a a a a a a w d W F d O \\ O F F o aq w w w w w 0 0 0 0 0 4a4 q z z 0 w a d ❑❑ a m m a w w 4 4 4 Q Q w w w w w 0 0 m 0 a O m 3 m w 0 Z w m 4 p p W d d d W W a u u S w w w w w w w w w w w w [w.. [w.. 4a] O O> m E Z U 4 4 z z U' U' a a a a a\\\ u U' U' U' V' U' 4 a 4 Q d a U U U' w w F F> d d> a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 a a\l a ❑ x x m w w F F a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Q a a a a w w U w m vl p a o 0 m b m ry m N N m m m m m Z Z£ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m P m m p ' o o ✓1 v1 �n m m �n �n m m �n �n �n �n in �n �n �n �n �n ail vi m � � m m Z O O P r.t m m m m m m m m m M m m rt P rl M M rf rt rf m m p .� .y m m tit r1 E Y Q Z d Q m w m a I O O W F 0 0 0 0 0 o m o m o 0 w r r o o ry O O O o O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O N O N o 0 m �+ 1n o o ✓1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 o m o 0 E y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to F U b Jl O N m Q 0 O O 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 O 0 O O 0 O P P O O O 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O P P 1 P P P P 0 O O O O O O p O O O Z Z ❑ ❑ m m z Z Q 4 M N S $ \ \ U U m W W a s o d a Q x x F F w W w w w w w w w w w W w w w w w w w w w w w w w w m m Z Z Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y X I U U U U U U U U V U U U U U U U U U U U V U U U U U U U 4 N Yi O O O O O O '> O .> O .> O❑ '> O O O' O O O O O O O O F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F .w] 5 Z Z p m M ❑ 'J M N b b M b M b b b M b b W b b b b b M b b b b b b M M Q 'D O O m -m U U 'y'y y 'y y uai 4 a a a¢ a a a a a a a a a Q a a a a a a a Q a Q Q d 4 � >> > > F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F m z a z z z a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Z o > .+ .+ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'J O O !'t !"1 V1 Ifl N N J1 N Vl ICl 111 Vl Vl m In N N 0 N N 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 a O O a O O O F >> >> F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F U I-1 I-i 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 O VAR 016 mm m m e �mmm ❑ F 2 O H \ N S m m £ Q m F F F E F E E F F F F F F F F F N m F O �1 O i(1 O O O O O O O O O O r N O N m u1 z 41 F Z r r m O O O O m .. .. q £ N m a trl O N m O �1 N •+ N N M a a Q Q F F Z Z m W o Imi a u u u u a a a a a a ¢ a ¢ a s a m m o > > > > a a a a a a a a H y H O E m m m m F F E u E E F F F F O >> a 0 Y Y O Y F O F O F > O m F F F E O E W z W Z� W F Y a iUi L Q4 m W W S W x W m x m O > m 0 Z O m O W W O ! O H O O > a m a m C O ❑ x u u u u S ❑ ❑ ❑ a ❑ ❑ a Z u ❑ m Z ❑ ❑ z a zu Y T z Z m Z W £ Z m W Z W W m Z W W .a d d W O W a W m \ W Z Z Z Z W Z m a a a ❑ m a c� a a a a a a m a m a m m £ m m m u o m o 0 o I I m m m m rn m m ry ul vl In IO m ❑ rl z I -I ❑ z H g '.J I�1 N (+I �(1 t1 i() N I N I N I' N I b b N N N IO N fu m b m b m O n � M Z c e c r-I N .y .-I O P IO m ti o my m c O �n O �n O ❑ m m r+ o 0 0 0 �++ I -I Y 4 Z W Q m W m m I O O W F m O O O r r r f N O b O O c m N O m O O O �lI N ill ifl �Il �O �O m O 0 � m O Z O O N N r-I ff a rl O ti O .4 O 0 0 0 0 O rl O .4 O r1 O N O O O O O O W W W W m E' V-I H U V S m U OU z d C C C C w W m W m W m W m m F i-I I -I Z m m t1 O m U m W ❑ E Y O z ZI z z z a 4 K E 0 W W W W W W m a s S F q W Y Y Y W W W W U Z m a Q F W I U U U 2 ZI y 2 F £ Z y F Z F E F 9 z w z W z W z W z W q �� 3 Q❑ ZW �a 2 � 3 S a Cqq �Z-1 OU fm] a XOX O X OX x Ox W E q5q F m Z m m m m m m m m m m m m m LZi y� F y W 0 W > o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r o OIE-I S S x Y Qi qi' 4 Q q U cut Q U 017 m m m rn m m m m KO F Z rl O .N+ � m E a m m F F F H F E E F d d N m in r m rn m m �n ui M F c O m P r m O m Z W F Z i. o N N I 01 m O� V1 a �n m F F O F O F o F F F F ti F F F F F F F N m o r m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N �p ry r m N H r m c N m N m O O m �O N m t0 N O N O m r m O (+1 N O m N U m W M > z F y O F d C u m W ❑ m iWi a d d 0 m m W a d d 0❑>❑ m m M a d d m m W a d d m m W a d d m m �Wi a d d o❑ m m W a d d m a F m a H S a z d W d> o VI a s F U] a R O d Z W m> � m m a a E O 0 H a tm/1 S W Z ❑ W O> a d m Z u N ❑ � a m Q m a F EO. O: ❑p N Z Z W U' > m p W N❑ p Z ra ❑ O Z ri a W $. 2 o O r d ❑❑ O O r d O O� N m W o 01 N r+1 W OP O m W❑❑❑ o O� m m O m p i O T m O � N m Z F e O� e m m o a' m H Y Q Z d a m W m a 0 o o m F a W m O O O O O O o O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 o O o O O N O m m m z o r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 0 r m 0 N 0 m m 0 r m 0 r m 0 r E Z O O .y Jl N •i N N ry N N ..+ N N .y ifl N N O ry p .� O N O O O N P m e m N P m e U U Q O O O 0 0 O 0 O O O ti O O O O 0 N a i F W rZ-i m N m m m m m m 0 W W W W W W W W d Q F E F E r7 a F F F H N Z m m In m m m m m F W Z 0 > o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vl N 0 0 0 O0 u E F F F E F F E a m N m N In m m m V U U U U a a m F u>i N N N N F a O m m m 0 O ZO ZO H F F O O 0 0 >>> a m m N a z F F F F F F O O O U U U U U U❑ N N r O V W W d d W d W d W d W d Z W W >>> W W Z W F N m N m m> a a m> U1 Z z ? ri H �+ rZi H m m m d O O O m m m m m m o 0 o m O O ill JI O �Il O O O O O e O� m O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �C m N N m N m ✓1 m O O O O OP O N O O y W U a z Z y a m a a C a F O W Z Z z m W ❑ a U a a m Z N m W p❑ a U a a m Z rZi m W a V a a m Z U m F z a¢ F a m o u W Y U m F z F a z 0 u W Yq V m F z Q F a m Z 0 u W Y U m F z a F a z 0 u W Y U z (A F z 4 F a z 0 u W YQ U �+ m F z a F a z o u W Y N O W > a o m ❑ Z a a W F Q m O W > a 0 m ❑ Z a a W F a m O W > a 0 m ❑ Z a a W H 6 a a uai m F m 0 F m 0 F m 0 F a F a F F a F F F z F a F a F in o o 0 a 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N F 0 F 0 E 0 F a F z F z F a F s F F F c F a F 47 018 Fg s �e (7 y q Q m m F 10 F m F m F 10 F lO F lO F �C F 10 F IO F �O E m F m F l0 F V F ID F l0 F m F u F IO F ID F m F lO 10 F E d d N N1 ri E. ri m v m m m rn m c 1n < rn v to v m m m o rn 1l N r o m n to m � o f a 0j � 1 I I .-I N d o m m r m N r W r U Z m 'n m n m m N O C N U p m a a F W IUi OC o d o a O W o O a a S m iW-I m rW-I m IWi m W m W m IWi m H m rWi m W m W m W m W m W m W m IW-I m N m H m W m W o m a W S a o f.01 a 0 S o > > m a W S 2 m z I -I u m W ❑ z W > z a W W u a d 0 m a d 0 m a d 0 m a d 0 m a d 0 m a d 0 m a d O m a d 0 m a d 0 m a d 0 m a d 0 m a d 0 m a d 0 m a d 0 m a d 0>> m a d m a d m a d O m a d 7 m a z d W 7 m > z W ¢¢ S a z O d W 3 O a m a W d U W M❑ U a W N O r N r m r O c c N N ti c Ol �I1 N m N c e v IO N m O N O N r O m w l0 f"1 O I'1 N m nl P m r Ol O� Ol m N O I'1 V O m Yl N N c O r m Ol 10 m O O ill O O r ❑ Z E "„J O O a U m U a U a U a U a U a U a U a V a U a U a m U a U = a V a w U a U a U a U m U m U v ti N � Q Z d a m W m a 0 o w F a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r W l0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � zy m ti F m o m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. m r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r m F N N N N N N rl N N m 0 N N I(1 V V1 O O N O C O N O N O N O N, O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N m I 0 �Il m 0 C 0 V O N O N N l0 U Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U Z O o d u F U 0 F u 0❑ F u F u 0 F u 0❑ F u E u 0 F u 0 E u 0 E u 0 E u 0 E U 0 E U 0 F u 0❑❑❑ E u F u F u F u 0❑ F u F u 0 N a W a a a °a 0 °a °a a° °a a a °a a a a° °a °a °a 0 °a °a a a W I Q d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d F m a W F a z rZVi W u W u W u W u W u W W u W u W u W W V W u W W u W W u W u W u W u W u a O 3 m F F N N u u o u N d O Z F d 0 d 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 d 0 d 0 d 0 d 0 d 0 d 0 W 0 0 0 d 0 O Wo m Z m O Z F F m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m O m 0 m 0 > O F > Z F d y O 00 W > O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ill F `a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Z a V I -I F m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m O Q 019 qZ r v r m 0 F y Ni N £ q G. G m F E F f N m M F Z F o N m ~ c N o o r N m Z m N N rn a � o m 0 O o N N O N N m N N F v p m 4] F Z ❑ £ a ❑ a O a a U .� N Z O O O O O N O w V F F a F H O F U E H O m Z C m 8 F C !il K S o V S z ffi a Z m Z � a K Z � Z M mo > > > > a > y 4 U .m. F Z '+ d ❑ O > y > 4 m r m N N L ❑ N � Z r N m O o O F a z a q m m m a i o o � E 1' O O Ol m N N r N £ F 7 O O N o N o N n U V q o 0 0 0 ❑ U > m ❑ m m o o N fu O z a m � o a m � i F O m F ❑ z U A m H K Z 3 m y N O OF rWi t� aOa a a ❑ til H �.] O m F Z w m m ❑ 49 Z O > o N 0 0 O 0 O 0 i� U N O il O ? 0 O D O 4 U 3 3 3 a 020 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 08:26AM 06/11/01 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 45597 06/11/01 ATT075 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 134.50 45598 06/11/01 IMPO10 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 6712.48 45599 06/11/01 KRI100 BRUCE KRIBBS CONSTRUCTION 1175.00 45600 06/11/01 SOU010 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO 728.49 45601 06/11/01 SPRO10 SPRINT 801.45 45602 06/11/01 VER200 VERIZON 414.87 45603 06/11/01 WEL025 WELLS FARGO BANKCARD 3588.33 CHECK TOTAL 13,555.12 )n 021 4 a O F z 0 �i £ F F F F F 0 F u F F E F F F F F F F F 4 a O N 'y '-I O P m m O P r N r O O W S r a y .., a. � P„ m ti r �n o m m r m r m N m r� m r r r m m m n o N I m� 0 N a aTp N ~ r m > a ~ N r m P m m m a 4 a W H p > 2 I-i O d u U m r,� ❑ > W O_ a a a W > W O_ m a a W > Q O W F O a p m❑ z a W a> W > Q O a F (a) a O a❑ F Z V W W> a W 4 0 0 ❑ F Y a a 0 a❑ 3 z W W ❑> �+ U >>❑ m m❑> 4 Q O F a U O m z W a U >>> m W Z o U vi W Z o x Q O F U a (n O ❑ W z Z W p> x V >> N W Z o x 4 O E U a m O ❑ W Z Z W p> S a X W a > qa X W z F W W> Z x U Z a W X W z W W s F X F W a z❑ W> W x > y❑ ❑ I > y= m It � ✓� N ul m N O N O O H N m N 0 ti N O JI Ol m m O1 Q� r+ Y Q Z a Q m W m a I O O W F a m o m 0 e 0 m w 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o m N m 0 o o 0 0 0 y m ri rf N o N N r'+ ri o m m m m m m F •a N N ill N �I1 I(1 O ul �I1 r N N O O O O ✓1 U Q o 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z F O m m o in a .W-1 m y N a 2 .+ O B z m W >> (al N N �Wj a �+ 3 w Q m ul >> W UI y a a 3 w Q m u�a lai] m N s a 3 Q O F Q a a a a a y F F j E Z O N m a Y W a m O m a U z a S 0 O m U m s U z s x 0 p m Z s a Z a Dr Z a d z ON a > z ON s 4] > ❑ a Q U Y Z ¢ a m N a a 41 3 ❑ a a U Y Z a a v. N a a 41 3 ❑ a Q U Y Z z a m a a W 3 ❑ a a U Y Z a 4• m a a W 3 ❑ a a U Y Z a a to a a 4] 3 F y n p c� W 0 F W > in E �n F �n F o a 0 O .. 0 ti ❑❑ 0 fy 0 a a 0 a a 0 a a 0 O a W 0 O s W O N a W N a W N N a W N a W N a W a 51 0.22 D,CCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER ::ITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF HECK CHECK VENDOR VUMBER DATE NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 45584 06/07/01 &01437 MICHAEL PHLAUM 45585 06/07/01 BEA100 BEAUMONT KAWASAKI 45586 06/07/01 CAL040 CALIFORNIA VISION SERVICE 45587 06/07/01 CAN050 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO 45588 06/07/01 LAQ050 LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES 45589 06/07/01 LAQ054 CITY OF LA QUINTA/HOUSING 45590 06/07/01 PRI050 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL 45591 06/07/01 RIV040 RIVERSIDE CNTY DEPT CHILD 45592 06/07/01 SUP100 SUPPORT PAYMENT CLEARING- 45593 06/07/01 TRA030 TRANSAMERICA INSURANCE 45594 06/07/01 UNIO05 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 45595 06/07/01 UNU050 UNUM LIFE INS 45596 06/07/01 VER200 VERIZON CHECK TOTAL 09PM 06/07/01 PAGE 1 PAYMENT AMOUNT 55.00 611.47 1029.20 487.92 325.00 20000.00 44973.74 426.50 150.00 50.47 179.00 1628.40 28.38 69,945.08 51) 023 a F O r 0 m o W U' £ Q x V F Q m m rn m E m m m F m rn m F rn m m F m m rn F m m rn F m m m F m m m F a m rn F m m m F m m rn F m rn m F m m a F d d O N F O O ill r'1 N rl O N N m O O O O v c O l'1 O m O O r O O W •L O N OI O r U1 O ill m �D O O O� y, Q ill O rl O o O O� m p N v O r O N O O V O O r � m r ❑ �n U o rl ❑ m d o 0 m N m ❑ N O r N �� ul n 4 ZY O N v a I Y Q I 3 W O > z H d a v a m F m O Q H U a O ❑ ❑ z z W] U U O F O W u ; U U a O F F O O F a W O U ❑ y W Zq a m O m F a O z ❑ O z W a Q O a'' F m a Z O .. ❑ z � U d a 1 0 F N a % O ❑ o z qE a. W O a ❑ O Z F Iu a O ❑ m m z m z a a u a O m F M a O a ❑ a z N z s a 1 0 E 41 a % O ❑ o z V1 z C I O F L a 0 ❑ o z W ❑ O m F a ❑ ❑ z ❑ W 1 1-1 o m W ❑ W d> W a >> a W m W a> W m W m> > W W d> a W a> \ d Z W a> a E ❑ W £❑ F W z> W W a> \ d W a> \ d a W > ❑ 4 a \ d p❑ a W �n m m m I o I 0 o 0 > 1y. ❑ > m m a r o r 0 rn o m r r r m e ❑ .-1 OI 01 o c Z Z o Q Z d Q m W m a I O O I+. F a o m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W o r r o p o p o 0 0 0 0 c IO 10 N N N rl N N N N N N F y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ O o o 0 m 0 m 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 p 0 o 0 0 p 0 o 0 0 u a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ey N W O ❑ I U O m ti a V F C W N O U a U m W m U Z O a O S F 4 W Z Q W O o .. z d £ a W u ❑ W � a¢ ° � W z a s ❑ F � F .•y33 W F a Z m M Q❑ �. O Q a a W Q x Y� F Z 0 £, ❑ Y F 0 0 £ m Q Z a O d d a Q ❑ Q Q F N O d .al d O r a Q d U s Q d U W ❑ m a W a H a O d a W m Z Q 3 ❑ W rau uai a 4 a F H a H s I'-1 o Qd 1 z m z £ m m u u a u d d a m H m F to y 0 W > r 0 0 0 0 0 c p o 0 ❑ ("1 0 0 ul m m ✓+ o m o 0 0 0 0 0 ' a u .H. o uai uai a a a a a s z Q U d m m u V a a d d 5 m F O 53 024 A i4 M a Q z fil E ❑ Z H o a a a m Q o a a a z m m z > z o > 0 0 O o O O N U F � a Z Y 54 07.5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 45581 06/05/01 IMP010 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 45582 06/05/01 TRI100 TRI STATE LAND SURVEYORS 45583 06/05/01 VER200 VERIZON CHECK TOTAL 4:33PM 06/05/01 PAGE 1 PAYMENT AMOUNT 11755.68 18300.00 2900.18 32,955.86 55 026 N N N O F Z O N O £ a _ m F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F a a r P [r 1p P t. Z w F $. 'a r m ✓1 (�1 . m ✓1 r m to O O m N b ✓1 r� + ✓1 m P� N O N m m � Jl O O � O �Il O N O O O O O �(l O N m m ✓1 a r.i m O m �p O J1 n Q m U O W m Q O ry a O N w O > NV Z O m a UI W ❑ U > N u a F U W a W U > UI u " a F U W a w U > [A u H a F U w a w U > fn u a F U W a W V > m u a F U W a w U > N u a F U w a w U > Ul u a F U w a W U > N u a F U w a W U > N u a F U w a w U > N u tt F U W a w V > U] u a F V W a W U > N N a F U w a w U > vl u a F U w a w U > UI u a F U W a W U > N u s F U W a W U > N u z F U W a w a U F > O O F u a o a❑ F Z U W w> ..� w U > a a H Z S U W F U > a a u Z S U w F U > a a H Z S U w F U > a a u Z S U W F U > a a H Z S U W F V Q > F O a F' a a u O ❑ Z Z S W U> W F V > m w Z O x �. U > N W Z O S a O £ O F a I a a H O Q S F O F O a F O a❑ - Z. W a> 6H' 4 a I ❑ w w [J W 0 > N.t ❑ ❑ H w E• ❑ a O P .y o o � w �tl ,.n 0 0 in Jl .y 0 0 N l0 .y 0 0 � �O ti 0 0 � O n 0 0 in P H 0 0 N t l r 0 0 � r �O 0 in 0 �(1 0 � O❑ .y o o � z a > 'J �+ a a > H a a > p H a a > p z > 0 s O o O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 P •+ �+ � N 4 m a Q Z a 4 m w m a � o o W F a W N f�l N �`t N t+1 !•1 f�l M t+l l0 N � .y O ti b lO � O O O O O O O � � ❑ '$ r N r N r N r N r N r N r N r N m O m O r N r N r N r N r N r N r N m O m O m O m O m O 0 �fl M Jl m H m --' m F a ❑O P � P in P � P � P � P in P in P � m r r P ui f�l �n P �n P �n P �n P �n P ,n f`l r m r P r ✓1 r N m r M �n P �n P �n e �n Q O r� o fi 0 N 0 �-1 0 .-1 0 •i 0 0 N 0 r-� 0 0 P 0 P 0 '-1 0 0 r-� 0 ry 0 '-I 0 rl 0 "I 0 H 0 P 0 0 e 0 e 0 0 P 0 P 0 0 P 0 0 rl 0 0 H 0 0 .y H 0 M o❑ M f/1 o fn 0 N 0❑ M f/1 o 4] 0 N 0 N 0 (n 0 Ui 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 VI o O Y w O Y w O Y w O Y w O Y W O Y w m 4 Z o a Z 0 c� z Z 0 u a a 0 u a Z 0 a Z 0 a Z 0 u s Z 0 u a Z 0 u a Z 0 a Z 0 u z 'Z 0 u a Z 0 c� s Z 0 a Z 0 .u. a Z 0 c� a Z o u c > a ❑❑❑❑❑❑ a > a a > a a > a a > a a > a a Z M a p Y pl a a a a H a W „ a a a w a a a w a a a W a a a W a a w a a a w a a a w a a F a w H a Q a w a a a w F a a a w a a a W N££ a a w H a a a w H a a a w a a a a w x W F a F m a F w F a F N a F w F a F m a F w F a F m a F W F a F w a F w F a F m a F Z 0 N W >>>> a 0 N w Z 0 N w 2 0 N H w F a Z O p Y u ry W > o O a O O a o O a o O a O O a o O a 0 O a 0 O a 0 O a o O a O O a o O a 0 O a 0 O a 0 O a 0 O a 0 O a 0 0 H 0 ri 0 o O N o N a 0 N a 0 N a 0 N a 027 ❑ 0 w o a a £ a N e Z O a F Y a a a w w Y d a U a ❑ ❑ a h F O O F U U w Z U U U u U U U o££ z> > ❑ w > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > w m y m t/] N m N Vl N N N vl tl N N N h O O U F a a u w> u U U M U U N N U U u N > w Q a f/1 41 N E F F F M F F N N» ti o w a a s a a a a a a a a a s a a a a w > w w F E F F F F F F F F F F F F F N M w w Z 2 O Z U U U U U U U U U V U U U U U Z O x S F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F V] N N N N f/1 U] N N Vl UI U fn N N N N O O w w Z Y Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z >> O+ 0 0+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0• 0 0« 0 0 a s o F F F F F F F F F F F a F F♦ F F N UI a a a a a a a a+ a s O U♦ f9 U O D U U U C9 l➢ U. U U. U U ❑❑, z z ♦ F ad a« a a« a a a a a a a a« a a« a a E F« a Z Z N H 4 Q. a a• Q Q Z Z Z« 4 4 N• o 0 0« N y« a a � a« a z« z a a z z a z z« te a« a a a F ❑ a a a m a a a a a a a a. a a a a a a a �+ .. « z z w ♦ M £ « £ £ £ £ £ £ £ + £ £ Y £ w w w Y a a Z O w > .£+ .£+ .£+ >>> s F F O O > U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'J Q O w N O♦ O O a O O O O O O O O• O O« O O N N N• .y .+ w ❑ m a a Y a m m w a a a a a a. m a a n, a a a« .+ .. J^ Z£ w ££« N£ N f£££« M£+ ££ w w w. O O m N a a Y N♦ F > Z N o o m vi m � p m o P �It a � (� I r o O O m N ❑ C O O £' m O m .y N m m �fl m O c .+ O m �D �I1 O m t•1 m F N N Y1 a �O m N N Ol N N N P m e H w m N P ry ❑ � D I 9 N a m x w Y U > U W O a o 0 o F o o F o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o F o o F o 0 0 0 o E a w S o 0 o F w a S U❑ w U m C9 U' U U U' F U Z C9 w £ ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ O w ' ❑ O H a Z w O U Z �1 m m m m❑ j= a o a a a a a Z Z U F a O w w fil w w J m w w w a O O O O O O a E E. F F F E. w F a a Q Q a 4 a Z N N N N N N N N m e I N m e O O O m I-i a o 0 0+ .+ . m m m m m m m m• �O �O • \o �O m 1D �O ♦ 0 0 0 Q o w o 0 r a m z z u u Z r r r r r r r r r r r Z r r Z r r Z .+ m a Q O m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m M m O O O F a z N w Z lD Z w w 1p w w tO w w Z w Z w Z m a a a a a a E w F O m m Q P Q P e v a P c Q c c c a O m m Q Z O Z O N o U F U U U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 M ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 11:33AM 06/04/01 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** PAYMENT AMOUNT 45560 06/04/01 ABE001 JACQUES ABELS 150.00 45561 06/04/01 BECO10 DEBORAH BECHARD 50.00 45562 06/04/01 BOB100 BILL BOBBITT 50.00 45563 06/04/01 BUTO10 RICHARD BUTLER 150.00 45564 06/04/01 CUN100 DENNIS CUNNINGHAM 50.00 45565 06/04/01 DAVO10 MIKE DAVIS 50.00 45566 06/04/01 DIA100 DENISE DIAMOND 50.00 45567 06/04/01 HENO10 MICHELLE HENSON 50.00 45568 06/04/01 IRWO10 JOSEPH IRWIN 50.00 45569 06/04/01 KIRO10 TOM KIRK 150.00 45570 06/04/01 LEWO10 TOM LEWIS 50.00 45571 06/04/01 MCM210 LESLIE MCMILLAN 50.00 45572 06/04/01 MOU100 DONALD J MOULIN 50.00 45573 06/04/01 OLA100 MILTON OLANDER 50.00 45574 06/04/01 OSB050 LEE M OSBORNE CPA 50.00 45575 06/04/01 REB050 JOAN REBICH 50.00 45576 06/04/01 REY050 ELAINE REYNOLDS 50.00 45577 06/04/01 ROB150 STEVE ROBBINS 150.00 45578 06/04/01 SHA040 ROSITA SHAMIS 50.00 45579 06/04/01 STJO10 VICTORIA ST JOHNS 50.00 45580 06/04/01 TYL050 ROBERT T TYLER 150.00 CHECK TOTAL 1,550.00 54 029 E Z O v O w � _ U t9 t9 t9 t9 U V O U t9 t9 :9 O H 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o o O O o o 0 0 o 0 O 0 o 0 o 0 O w y O O O O o O O o O O O O a �a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 c 0 o 0 N w .u. > Z Z O a N w ❑ Z F £ £ £ 0 O c� ,0 Z Z a d � a F 0 F a z w > F £ £ O U U > N N z8 O £ £ OU Q F O F a Z w > O w 4 U N z Q Q F J O F u a FS Z x w u > Q Z F £ £ £ O V u Z z a a � Q F O E a 0 Z w > ❑ w a V N Z 4 Q F \ O F u a �Q Z 2 w u > Q E £ £ O U U > N F zm 0 £ £ OU 6 E O F a 2 w > F £ £ O U N F a Q �8 O F ..> U a F 0 F a Z w > F £ £ O U U > N N z ❑ £ £ OU 6 F O F a Z w > 9 N O N ❑ a Q F O F F w a FS N Z w w > > z Z F f E £ 0 V c� Z Z a a a .. a F 0 F a S Z w > m > O h ❑ a F w FS N w > .' 4 F O F a Z w > F £ £ O V N E a Q a O F a u U o p > a o o N ti 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N M Y a z a a m w m a O o w F a w m o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 £ y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m o 0 a Z ZO z Q m w ❑ Z x z 3 N U a Z a mmq m m U .N. > ❑ w iai Y £ iQ+ d O a m Q �N+ ❑ N 4a] d Y .w] w n ❑ m a z ❑ E o £ � F F a N z z o > o 0 0 0 5fl Q U 4 m m m V ❑ ❑ 2 Y .] £ 030 F Z O P O N U C9 c9 U U U U U U O 4N N O O O O O O O O O F o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F Z F 0 m z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o a o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a ✓) U' N O N N U' N U' J1 N F F F z m m m F ! N Y O O O £ £ Z E S Z N h y O O O 0 £ z a > a > a > a a a a a a a Z F Q F Q F Q E > F F F S F F F > F L F O O O m 0 O O O O m O 0 0 W 0 F F F F Q Q 6 a a a a F a .] a D a a s F a c� a 0 m x x o a o - > z S F o F o F 0 z o 0 z g .z. 8 Z U Z N Z m z m Z D Z D Z Z Z D Z D Z Z Z r N w W w w W w W £ w F w Z w F w £ w zZa w > > > > £O > > > > > > O z z z .a] > O a vI ti r. U U a U U w fil W O o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o to o 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 > > m N N N N N N N N N Z Z £ ri z qq qq q a' q q ❑❑ E S S £ £ £ L F z a Z a Q m W m a I o o w F a o 0 0 0 0 0 o O o cu o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 £ D m m P rn m Ol m m m Z O O O O O O O O O F .+ F ^J ul N Jl O O O Jl 0 N O Q rl rl r1 N N < N N P U F .y Q O o O o O O O O o m o a o a z z ul Z a Z z m n 0 0 a z h a F 4 d a 4 O £ Z Z ? E O z0 F � ❑ E a n m rn a > a W z 0 > o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .'J O O ill N O Y .y ra O O 0 O O O U ry D a m m m Q h a Q w U £ 0 O m z N y F 1) 031 I COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 Transmittal of Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: I --- STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Transmittal of Treasurer's Report dated April 30, 2001 for the City of La Quinta. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with California Government Code Section 53645 as amended 1 /1 /86; and is in conformity with City Code 3.08.010 to 3.08.070 Investment of Money and Funds. I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet next month's estimated expenditures. sub M. Falconer, Finance Director ( Approved for Submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: Treasurer's Report, City of La Quinta 61 T4hr4.fP4" MEMORANDUM TO: La Quinta City Council FROM: John M. Falconer, Finance Director/Treasurer SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report for April 30, 2001 DATE: May 29, 2001 Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month ending April 30, 2001. The report is submitted to the City Council each month after a reconciliation of accounts is accomplished by the Finance Dept. The following table summarizes the changes in investment types for the month: Investment Beginning Purchased Notes Sold/Matured Other Ending =Change �Cash $837,401 $1,005,221 (1) $1,842,622 ! $1,005,221 LAIF $8,746,551 113,203 0 8,859,754 113,203 US Treasuries (2) $36,373,520 (7,411,000) (1,954) 28,960,566 (7,412, 954) US Gov't Agencies (2) $12,881,355 48,153 12,929,508 48,153 Commercial Paper (2) $4,986,219 3,500,000 (5,000,000) 6,835 3,493,054 (1,493,165) Mutual Funds $2,956,693 7,667,913 1 10,624,606 7,667,913 Total $66 781 739 $12 286 337 $12 411 000 $53 034 $66 710,110 $71 629) I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code; and ins in conformity with the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the pools expenditure requirements for the next six months. the City of La Quinta used the Bureau of the Public Debt, U.S. Bank Monthly Statement and the Bank of New York Monthly Custodian Report to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. Director/Treasurer Footnote (1) The amount reported represents the net increase (decrease) of deposits and withdrawals from the previous month. (2) The amount reported in the other column represents the amortization of premium/discount for the cry month on US Treasury, Commercial Paper and Agency investments. S °- N E E 9 E 0 W s J w a 'yam S u 3 c C C C C C c v Z C Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 8 � LAC E o N U ¢ v v to ¢ w o, c m w 0 0 m? o v wWa C C C QOO"'°_ Qw� a. qa a�JpQ o w nv.` 03 �o aaw N C N ems' 10 N 00 Op N `� > ry WC N tt O O LLN w N O 05 Nam m C6 c E E w n `u J Z m o o Q LL= N N n N O � o O h v N N N N e N q 0 a Z 0 �i Q Q m rn v E ° iy E N a � �m •�=`o �O Q mU E Eu°,w w C 2Z LL. Nwi q C C V c U�NC �IL.y CO w a «�v w rno. c c m >.o J v v a v°° m E• LL w g E v t 10 m a E w 5 o am o�w"zo�LLmv m o aai ma Z46 o mLw y c Z vEaoo�"a�8ie LL oac om c m y =rym v E c g m y o E Z o w a E v « E E:t E S x E c q U v ¢ N u w c$ E Z x€ EEO i S s 5 E w y 8 o @ LL E o o x m > o c c 63 U mE a w i m ` o w a°i6a� `o 1615 m mm? E E` www a 2 NN« `o m m m a`<<0 % to Y� tad {it i LSL c5�55 � _ t 2 SH 3� $ xgxggg CS3 $�$6mmIM s�g�g��� o $ x 12 i 2 Id!� A EQ_ IRS $ Rep, 1INNAMASH to a E i &B�mno.a 8.$ i his 666< $g LipNwo�w a F66 Y YE p� YE=_S�$98 E»mow YE R x a x xxx�� sx a s E2� tlN,NNNNNVIN $ $ E$ JJ7JJJ7�2gR $z°�C �Efl iiiigSi� EC ii F pp 99s gp y9g2 His g ;is It to show Him �.• v: '^iiibiii>� =sd ��i5vi gp 1E F €LLx $$f ��rceas d d'SSSFFF� pc mmmmm =-Wiim o _I V�f ff66666fo V Y 2333333333.+ Nan ,00xxx x:�x f liz Mill FFRFR S i IOZ 8?zUl M1OO lie €••F�oo JOJ fKOp EFI rcm a� r22u�rc 55m VU 64 =«$«#R £;zzz]§ o w& 2«$¥®K (zzzj§ j !«««CQk «§ �zzz\\ z00 \� �\ol\\\ § --C CL U)occ o0 ,, - 7 � e acu E / ( ; ¥33]) § � \ . ) , a ( 2 &} ! 2((kCL== e Iz:@o2 o(f_Z_2C IL a}}#) , EE! [00co> _( E %000e oe=_ §E CLD) L� L�Ek@@«! �36§\&»==tee )gn k000 =o 2$*«£aa ®K >- CO0)/ § § § a««$]®% §d§$ mzzz(Ij k\k� 000 It CL #f 5 Nm k�\ \ ) - -kae 2,c� .a»SE/ƒ >1ID 772c & zzz &&&,. ¥33L q ) § [) / o£� § . ED 2 ( @ &/ _ !((kk\ § ' z a-LL a) G ! &r6222A)20z � *ZZ\ Qa})f§ U) . E'lE���2k ! _(§E!!§22/)/ E �9K0000eE!__ oeee,_; k m -®k\{@&@@«� =]6\5»CLa-====»r 5 v ONO MmmmNC�Q(�WO N M Nm UNIo fQON p y o oNi v � N N nQQN NC(7N N H Q N N N O m N N 0 N N m d N -NOI � a ¢ Nne N m N Ili Np 'p^ Qmpm [O Yl OI OI I a` via N� i a c '^ 1 i ii c LL c a iy CLLC4L W E° U i j d LL o c a WC GJ mLL LLm� 0, c W E .a. Q a y Q a li d d j O a d U C U dra a"�"nnW�-a cumn (Zpi qC 2 WI- N yu a .�N'da W a Yl C W N O UUr C1G-CSNEU¢¢W LL' UOJ IL O.O F d m m N r M- m �vNin ry 0oN�m.. �MQQCD a - CD n w n Tmm Nn me''m W m n m 0 Q 2'� o m m m o'm'. {mil _ammo N0-I'. .n ri rri a; o m m 4 Ho�m QIN QN o m C ON m N Q m L N m m N mom m.o n rr W m o m v -- Om- mN- �-m NN W '- � e- fR o o m N M Q .1w N Q O O Q O n -mm ry N W m , aiNm rio v mmo Q -m no oN m o m. o 0 m r N N ro m N N O O �vr � rArR 5 Sib �l W O N N Q N N tY M r O OI - pNQ p0001 W 01 O ' eJ O���tAm'1 N Vl b A 00 M N OAo �0pp O at 1 A fm0 Nai O m N 001 Q ` (V M m0 < iV M IN LL N «_ Np0 u°i 1nQm Nmh M Q o°OMn o'1 A n A Y O N OO C'1 A M �� N A N W M OI O O! O n& - N O N M N 0) N A W A LL N N {"1 d 1Y N {Oy O NNO m N O W N Epp �ppO N p� N N Y OfO y�M "Q ��ypOONOI N N�ONM d m d LL h "gqg N IVIVIVY����Iq y1� mm^o-m pyW A m Q W N O O Q M N! M M b 0 N mN N 01 Z O N Cli A00'm 00 O ��{y�OO M O N M QryY1 mdM V 1 d lO M O O 0 10 a. 116 I O IbL t0 � CNl M O N V h d jb d NO� A N p n Mm NM O] N - n W yN W O)A COI ��OmAN y� M A N N (0 a Nn IAM .Ao 1Mb A LL d � N Q N A 4 j V N N M O C O Q pq O M 1�1�pppp AtOOm 4 � O A 000J� d � M Q N Q j0 01 m p0 1Ap 10 N C a L � O C ~ C ti N 'C � a N A X Y N C N N ? S2 y Y J C OI C RI Ol N C E1 X � q Y V � U C N LL rC � U N O q b y O N N yOyn� 0^ C T j N P i N t d 6 N L N ary O d L C d Y LL m 11-fn04' W w KOU❑ H Z 0 W 2 7 Y CITY OF LA DUINTA BALANCE SHEET 04 OVl ASSETS: CITY CITY RDA RDA FA FIXED LONGTERM FIXED LONGTERM FINANCING LONGTERM GRAND CITY ASSETS DEBT RDA ASSETS DEBT AUTHORITY DEBT TOTAL POOLED CASH (2,282,435.80) 11,961,07514 (19,240.52) 9,659,399,42 LORP INVESTMENT IN POOLED CASH 805,000.00 805,000.00 INVESTMENT T-BILUNOTES& OTHER 45,480,000.00 45,480,000.00 AUTO MALL CASH 2O6,379.08 206,379.08 LQRP CASH 30,595.75 3g595 75 BOND REDEMPTION CASH 81.024,68 1,482.54 82,507.22 BOND RESERVE CASH BOND PROJECT CASH 9,909,687.62 632,40986 10,542,097.48 BOND ESCROW CASH PETTY CASH 1,000.00 1,000.00 CASH& INVESTMENT TOTAL 43,404,943.28 22P8],383.]9 14,fi5188 6fi,606,9]8.95 INVESTMENT IN LAND HELD FOR RESALE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 43,186.99 PREMIUMIDISCOUNT ON INVESTMENT (98,870.29) LQRP-ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE INTEREST RECEIVABLE 76.44231 LOAWI�OTES RECEIVABLE CUE FFjOMOTHERAGENCIES 15,000.00 DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES -CVAG 2,299,096.69 CVAG ALLOWANCE (2,299,096.69) DUE FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTS 60,90000 8,010,000.00 8,114.08699 0.50 049 (96,86930) 82,723.71 82.72371 ]6,442.31 2,681,756.20 2,681,75820 15,000 00 2,299,096.69 (2,299,09669) DUE FROM OTHER FUNDS 882,491.63 551,03804 1,433,529.67 DUE FROM RDA 8,497,55020 8,497,550.20 INTERN ADVANCE -DUE FROM RDA 2,713,50654 2,713,50654 ADVANCES TO OTHER FUNDS NSF CHECKS RECEIVABLE 24,995.66 24.995,66 ACCRUED REVENUE 833.40 83340 TRAVE4ADVANCES 2,678,50 2,67850 EMPLOYEE ADVANCES PREPAID EXPENSES RECEIVABLE TOTAL 12,158,980 S4 3,3]],25185 8,010,00049 23,546,232.88 WORKER COMPENSATION DEPOSIT RENT DEPOSITS UTILITY DEPOSITS 75.00 75.00 MISC. DEPOSITS 2,100.00 2,100,00 DEPOSITS TOTAL 2,175.00 2.175.00 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS 1,386,331.67 15.590,69900 9.988,27905 26,965,W9.72 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (812,743.27) (812,]432]) AMOUNT AVAILABLE TO RETIRE LR DEBT 3.395,117 03 3,395,117 03 AMOUNT TO BE PROVIDED FOR LR DEBT 1,645,64T.34 95,393,26616 8,010,000,00 105,048,914. 10 TOTAL OTHER ASSETS 573,58840 15,590,699.00 1,645,647. 34 9,988,279,05 98,788,38379 8,010,000.00 134596,59]58 TOTAL ASSETS 56 139 68] 22 15 590,699 00 1 645 64] 34 26,164,635,64 9 988 2]9 05 9878838379 8 624 652 37 8 010 000 00 224 951 984 41 LIABILITIES: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE (50,490.66) (50,49066) DUE TO'OTHER AGENCIES 920,209.86 920,209.86 DUE TOIOTHER FUNDS 115,32110 1,318,20797 1,433,529.67 INTEREST ADVANCE -DUE TO CITY ACCRUED EXPENSES 6,029.10 6.029.10 PAYROLL LIABILITIES 2,247.54 2.24754 STRONG" MOTION INSTRUMENTS 407.66 407.66 FRINGEITOED LIZARD FEES 74.661,50 74,6fi1.50 SUSPENSE 4.19263 4.19263 DUE TO THE CITY OF LA pUINTA PAYABLES TOTAL 1,072,57933 1,318,207,97 2,390,]8].30 ENGINEERING TRUST DEPOSITS SO, COAST AIR QUALITY DEPOSITS ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES DEPOSITS 449,167.45 LORP DEPOSITS DEVELOPER DEPOSITS 1,089,615.85 MISC. DEPOSITS 448,69341 AGENCY FUND DEPOSITS 1.653,85964 15,663.00 449,16].45 15,663.00 1,089,515.85 448,693.41 DEFERRED REVENUE 8,270.67 8,010,000.00 8,018.27067 OTHER LIABILITIES TOTAL 8,270.67 8,010,000.00 8,018,2]0.6] COMPENSATED ABSENCES PAYABLE 321,991.94 321,991.94 DUE TOTHE CITY OF LA pUINTA 1,323,655 40 11,211,059 54 12,534,714.94 DUE TOiCOUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 12,249,102.00 12,249,102.00 DUE TOC.V. UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. 9,418,222 25 9,410,222,25 DUE TO!DESERT SANDS SCHOOL DIST. BONDS PAYABLE 65,910,000,00 8,010,000.00 73,920,000.00 TOTAL LONG TERM DEBT 1,645,647 34 98,788,36379 8,010,000.00 108,444,031.13 TOTAL LIABILITIES 4,722,08635 1,645,647U 1,333,870.97 98,788,383.79 8,010,000.00 8.010.000.00 122,509,988.45 EQUITY -FUND BALANCE 51,417,600,87 15,590,699.00 24,830,764.67 9,988,279,05 614,652,37 102,441,99596 TOTAL LIABILITY B EQUITY 5613968722 1559069900 164564734 2616463564 998827905 98,788,383,79 862465237 801000000 224.9519B441 CASH&INVESTMENT TOTAL 66,806,978.95 [� PREMIUMIDISCOUNT ON INVESTMENT 196,869,30) U TOTAL 66,710,109.65 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: ,June 19, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: 3 ITEM JITLE: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: _ Transmittal of Revenue and Expenditure Reports dated April 30, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Transmittal of the April 30, 2001 Statement of Revenue and Expenditures for the City Of La Quinta. ly nl M nce Director A prov d for submissionKb yj Thomas P. Genovese City Manager Attachments: 1 . Revenue and Expenditures Report, April 30, 2001 CITY OF LA QUINTA REVENUES -ALL FUNDS 07/01/2000-4/30/2001 FUNDS BUDGET RECEIVED % RECEIVED General FundRevenues $12,643,639.00 $14,129,867.18 111.8% Library 162,634.00 168,263.71 103.5% Gas Tax Revenue 591,177.92 528,778.09 89.4% Cmaq/Istea 287,423.00 0.00 0.0% Federal Assistance 340,400.00 0.00 0.0% Assessment District 2000-1 0.00 78,051.41 0.0% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 49,900.00 104,026.57 208.5% Local Law Enforcement 49,864.00 50,942.84 102.2% Lighting & Landscaping 778,000.00 454,920.69 58.5% Quimby 64,000.00 18,615.74 29.1% Infrastructure 358,989.00 118,722.90 33.1% Village Parking 1,500.00 1,008.85 67.3% South Coast Air Quality 22,044.00 20,602.86 93.5% Lq Public Safety Officer 2,200.00 2,362.54 107.4% Interest Allocation 0.00 502,395.70 0.0% ;Capital Improvement 45,193,813.02 9,576,088.81 21.2% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 1,998.09 0.0% ,Urban Forestry 11,000.00 0.00 0.0% Equipment Replacement 431,302.00 444,295.22 103.0% (Arts In Public Places 222,700.00 147,103.16 66.1% (Transportation 2,198,180.00 2,686,059.35 122.2% (Parks & Recreation 2,221,500.00 390,970.85 17.6% !Civic Center 303,900.00 588,099.70 193.5% (Library Development 1,554,418.00 1,660,723.01 106.8% Community Center 58,600.00 104,147.32 177.7%° !Street Facility 10,500.00 24,867.15 236.8% Park Facility 3,200.00 5,854.94 183.0% La Quinta Financing Authority 688,130.00 725,132.66 105.4% RDA Project Area No. 1 24,550,109.63 12,655,189.52 51.5% RDA Project Area No. 2 9,199,530.00 4,990,496.35 54.2% Total $101 998 653.57 $50 179 585.21 49.2% I 001 CITY OF LA QUINTA EXPENDITURES +ALL FUNDS 07/01/2000. 4/30/2001 FUNDS BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED REMAINING BUDGET % EXPENDED ,General Fund $15.252.236.33 $8,497,411.31 $40,899.59 $6,713.925.43 55.7% Library 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% !Gas Tax 591,177.92 348,666.60 0.00 242,511.32 59.0% Cmaq/Istea 287,423.00 0.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.0% Federal Assistance 130,000.00 0.00 0.00 130,000.00 0.0% Proposed Assessment District 2,188,059.00 25,889.39 0.00 2,162,169.61 1_2% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 30,100.00 62,435.31 0.00 (32,335.31) 207.4% Local Law Enforcement 50,164.00 0.00 0.00 50,164.00 0.0% ,Lighting & Landscaping 778,000.00 648,333.30 0.00 129,666.70 i 83.3% Quimby 329,844.46 48,709.52 0.00 281,134.94 14.8% Infrastructure 6,731,310.25 4,567,818.60 0.00 2.163,491.65 67.9% !Village Parking 29,236.00 0.00 0.00 29,236.00 0.0% South Coast Air Quality 5,700.00 6,340.00 0.00 (640,00) 111.2% Lq Public Safety O$ficer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Interest Allocation 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Capital Improvement 45,193,814.18 9,576,088.81 5,200.00 35,612,525.37 21.2% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Urban Forestry 11,000.00 0.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.0% Equipment Replacement 496,413.00 336,030.86 0.00 160,382.14 67.7% Arts In Public Places 646,539.08 159,306.31 0.00 487,232.77 24.6% ,Transportation 2,418,322.00 29,822.09 0.00 2,388,499.91 1.2% 'Parks 8 Recreation 2,020,000.00 0.00 0.00 2.020,000.00 0.0% Civic Center 203,700.00 169,750.00 0.00 33,950.00 83.3% ". Library Development 525,000.00 675.00 0.00 524,325.00 0.1% Community Center 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Street Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Park Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% La Quinta Financing Authority 1,205,861.78 688,087.50 0.00 517,774.28 57.1% ,. RDA Project Area No. 1 36,090,521.77 17,675,073.59 0.00 18,415,448.18 49.0% !, RDA Project Area No. 2 17,967,869.75 6,170,514.62 0.00 11,797.355.13 34.3% ,Total $133,182,292.52 _ $49010,952.81 $46099.59 $84,125,240. 12. 7 `' 002 CITY OF LA QUINTA GENERAL FUND REVENUES DETAIL TAXES: Property Tax No Low Property Tax Distribution Document Transfer Tax Sales Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Franchise Tax TOTAL TAXES LICENSE & PERMITS: Business License Animal License Building Permits Plumbing Permits Electrical Permits Mechanical Permits Misc. Permits TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS FEES: Sale of Maps & Publications Community Services Fees Bldg & Safety Fees Community Development Fees Public Works Fees TOTAL FEES INTERGOVERNMENTAL Motor Vehicle In -Lieu Motor Vehicle Code Fines Parking Violations Misc Fines AB939 State of California Grant CSA152 Assessment TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL INTEREST MISCELLANEOUS Miscellaneous Revenue Cash Over/(Short) TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFERIN TOTAL GENERAL FUND 07/01 /2000 - 4/30/2001 REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 520,600.00 371,766.43 148,833.57 71.4% 441,800.00 467,873.58 (26,073.58) 105.9% 275,040.00 374,970.32 (99,930.32) 136.3% 2,683,750.00 2,826,880.24 (143,130.24) 105.3% 3,289,100.00 3,137,600.60 151,499.40 95.4% 349,500.00 405,643.96 (56,143.96) 116.1% 7,559,790.00 7,584,735.13 (24,945.13) 100.3% 130,900.00 133,300.15 (2,400.15) 101.8% 8,400.00 10,811.50 (2,411.50) 128.7% 412,500.00 1,136,973.32 (724,473.32) 275.6% 89,400.00 178,804.19 (89,404.19) 200.0% 68,000.00 187,185.83 (119,185.83) 275.3% 35,800.00 105,129.14 (69,329.14) 293.7% 57,900.00 41,195.69 16,704.31 71.1% 802,900.00 1,793,399.82 (990,499.82) 223.4% 4,400.00 2,646.72 1,753.28 60.2% 143,675.00 106,297.47 37,377.53 74.0% 305,528.00 735,040.50 (429,512.50) 240.6% 161,100.00 273,877.77 (112,777.77) 170.0% 270,000.00 457,312.80 (187,312.80) 169.4% 884,703.00 1,575,175.26 (690,472.26) 178.0% 1,078,800.00 1,093,985.09 (15,185.09) 101.4% 56,250.00 41,876.85 14,373.15 74.4% 22,300.00 37,523.96 (15,223.96) 168.3% 3,600.00 11,115.46 (7,515.46) 308.8% 86,600.00 189,153.65 (102,553.65) 218.4% 115,355.00 148,674.80 (33,319.80) 128.9% 113,800.00 3,340.00 110,460.00 2.9% 1,476,705.00 1,525,669.81 (48,964.81) 103.3% 1,519,000.00 1,559,856.35 (40,856.35) 102.7% 68,900.00 30,912.47 37,987.53 44.9% 0.00 (6.56) 6.56 0.0% 68,900.00 30,905.91 37,994.09 44.9% 331,641.00 60,124.90 271,516.10 18.1% 12,643,639.00 14 129 867.18 (1 486 228.1 3) 111.8% 7.3 003 CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL LIBRARY: County of Riverside Interest TOTAL LIBRARY GAS TAX REVENUE: Section 2105 Section 2106 Section 2107 Section 2107.5 Traffic Congestion Relief Interest TOTAL GAS TAX CMAQ/ISTEA CMAQ/ISTEA Grant Interest TOTAL CMAQ/ISTEA FEDERAL ASSISTANCE REVENUE: CDBG Grant Interest TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1 REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 150,000.00 150,000.00 0.00 100.0% 12,634.00 18,263.71 (5,629.71) 144.6% 162 634.00 168,263.71 (5,629.71) 103.5% 135,600.00 111,976.88 23,623.12 82.6% 98,200.00 80,886.05 17,313.95 82.4% 175,100.00 148,882.79 26,217.21 85.0% 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 100.0% 172,777.92 172,777.92 0.00 100.0% 4,500.00 9,254.45 (4,754.45) 205.7% 591 177.92 528 778.09 62 399.83 89.4% 287,423.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 287 423.00 0.00 287 423.00 0.0% 340,400.00 0.00 340,400.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 340 400.00 0.00 340 400.00 0.0% Interest 0.00 78,051.41 (78,051.41) 0.0% Assessment Bond Proceeds 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Prepayments -sewer assessments 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRIC 0.00 78 051.41 (78 051.41) 0.0% SLESF (COPS)'iREVENUE: SLESF (Cops) Funding 48,400.00 100,027.94 (51,627.94) 206.7% Interest 1,500.00 3,998.63 (2,498.63) 266.6% TOTAL SLESF (COPS) 49,900.00 104 026.57 (54 126.57) 208.5% LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT REVENUE LLEBG Funding 49,564.00 49,772.00 (208.00) 100.4% Interest 300.00 1,170.84 (870.84) 390.3% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL LLEBG 49 864.00 50 942.84 (1,078.84) 102.2% LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING REVENUE Assessment 773,700.00 451,232.73 322,467.27 58.3% Developer 0.00 3,750.00 (3,750.00) 0.0% Interest 4,300.00 (62.04) 4,362.04 -1.4% TOTAL LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING 778,000.00 454 920.69 323,079.31 58.5% (4 004 CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) QUIMBY REVENUE: Quimby Fees Interest TOTAL QUIMBY INFRASTRUCTURE REVENUE: Infrastructure Fee Interest TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE VILLAGE PARKING REVENUE: Interest TOTAL VILLAGE PARKING SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY REVENUE: S.C.A.Q. Contribution Interest TOTALSCAQ LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER FUND Transfer In Interest TOTAL LQ PUBLIC SAFETY INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND: Pooled Cash Allocated Interest Transfer In TOTAL INTEREST ALLOCATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: CVAG Funding CVWD County of Riverside State of Ca- Office Emer. Services RCTC Funding IID DSUSD State of California SB300 Funding Surface Transportation S13821-Bicycle Path Grant APP Contribution Developer Agreement Funding Transfers in From Other Funds TOTAL CIP REVENUE REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 55,000.00 0.00 55,000.00 0.0% 9,000.00 18,615.74 (9,615.74) 206.8% 64,000.00 18 615.74 45 384.26 29.1 % 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 358,989.00 118,722.90 240,266.10 33.1% 358 989.00 118 722.90 240,266.10 33.1 % 1,500.00 1,008.85 491.15 67.3% 1,500.00 1,008.85 491.15 67.3% 21,244.00 19,185.05 2,058.95 90.3% 800.00 1,417.81 (617.81) 177.2% 22,044.00 20 602.86 1,441.14 93.5% 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 100.0% 200.00 362.54 (162.54) 181.3% 2,200.00 2,362.54 (162.54) 107.4% 0.00 502,395.70 (502,395.70) 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 502,395.70 (502 395.70) 0.0% 14,901,057.28 2,681,045.97 12,220,011.31 18.0% 1,922,975.00 213,068.97 1,709,906.03 11.1% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 12,168.00 0.00 12,168.00 0.0% 7,044.00 0.00 7,044.00 0.0% 530,600.00 0.00 530,600.00 0.0% 953,244.74 933,390.00 19,854.74 97.9% 67,000.00 0.00 67,000.00 0.0% 25,905.00 0.00 25,905.00 0.0% 443,839.00 158,436.37 285,402.63 35.7% 515,784.00 149,478.53 366,305.47 29.0% 25,814,196.00 5,440,668.97 20,373,527.03 21.1% 45,193,813.02 9,576,088.81 35 617 724.21 21.2% 79, 005 CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL REMAINING % (continued) i BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED LQ NORTE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: Prepayment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Bond Proceeds 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Interest 0.00 1,998.09 (1,998.09) 0.0% TOTAL LQ NORTE CIP 0.00 1,998.09 (1,998.09) 0.0% URBAN FORESTRY Grant Revenue 11,000.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.0% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL URBAN FORESTRY 11,000.00 0.00 11 000.00 0.0% EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND: FMP Equipment Charges 372,202.00 374,748.00 (2,546.00) 100.7% Interest 59,100.00 69,547.22 (10,447.22) 117.7% Transfers In 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 431 302.00 444 295.22 (12 993.22) 103.0% ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES REVENUE: Arts in Public Places Deposits 196,900.00 126,747.74 70,152.26 64.4% !' Arts in Public Places Credits Applied 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Interest 25,800.00 20,355.42 5,444.58 78.9% TOTAL ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES 222 700.00 147 103.16 75,596.84 66.1% These amounts are deposits and are treated as liabilities and not as revenues. TRANSPORT#ON Developerfees 284,000.00 694,851.85 (410,851.85) 244.7% Interest 23,100.00 100,127.50 (77,027.50) 433.5% Transfer in 1,891,080.00 1,891,080.00 0.00 100.0% TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 2,198,180.00 2,686,059.35 (487 879.35) 122.2% PARKS & RECREATION Developer fees 201,000.00 363,960.91 (162,960.91) 181.1% Interest 20,500.00 27,009.94 (6,509.94) 131.8% Transfer in 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.0% TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 2,221,500.00 390 970.85 1,830,529.15 17.6% CIVIC CENTER Developer fees 284,500.00 554,916.09 (270,416.09) 195.0% Interest 19,400.00 33,183.61 (13,783.61) 171.0% TOTAL CIVIC CENTER 303 900.00 588 099.70 (284 199.70) 193.5% 63 006 CITY OF LA Q INTA ALL OTHER F NDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) LIBRARY Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY CENTER REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 150,000.00 213,904.38 (63,904.38) 142.6% 17,900.00 60,300.63 (42,400.63) 336.9% 1,386,518.00 1,386,518.00 0.00 100.0% 1,554,418.00 1,660,723.01 (106 305.01) 106.8% Developerfees 53,500.00 96,959.86 (43,459.86) 181.2% Interest 5,100.00 7,187.46 (2,087.46) 140.9% TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 58 600.00 104 147.32 (45 547.32) 177.7% STREET FACILITY Developer fees 9,500.00 23,403.65 (13,903.65) 246.4% Interest 1,000.00 1,463.50 (463.50) 146.4% TOTAL STREET FACILITY 10 500.00 24 867.15 (14 367.15) 236.8% PARK FACILI Developer fees 3,000.00 5,429.80 (2,429.80) 181.0% Interest 200.00 425.14 (225.14) 212.6% TOTAL PARK FACILITY 3,200.00 5,854.94 (2,654.94) 183.0% ya 007 07/0112000 - 4/30/2001 GENERAL FUND EX♦jENDITURE SUMMARY REMAINING % BY DEPARTMENT BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED JJ. GENIE GOVERNMENT: LEGISLATIVE 585,850.00 439,129.81 0.00 146,720.19 75.0% CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 628,625.00 427,972.13 0.00 200,652.87 68.1 % ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 866,350.00 718,943.63 0.00 147,406.37 83.0% PERSONNEURISK MGT 454,562.00 278,051.75 175.00 176,335.25 61.2% TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 2,535,387.00 1,864,097.32 175.00 671,114.68 73.5% FINAN6 E II FISCAL SERVICES 505,210.00 364,938.80 0.00 140,271.20 72.2% CENTRAL SERVICES 411,715.00 319,210.61 0.00 92,504.39 77.5% TOTAL FINANCE 916,925.00 684,149.41 0,00 232,775.59 74.6% CITY ERK 369,295.00 276,926.97 5,216.18 87,151,85 75.0% COMM NITY SERVICES SENIOR CENTER 249,190.00 173,937,46 0.00 75,252.54 69.8% PARKS& RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 667,750.00 377,068,87 10,111.76 280,569.37 56.5% PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAMS 90,100.00 52,898.54 0.00 37,201.46 58.7 % TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 1,007,040.00 603,904.87 10,111.76 393,023.37 60.0% POLIO 3,600,554.00 2,115,020.75 23,868.00 1,461,665.25 58.7% BUILDI�JG & SAFETY: BUILDING&SAFETY -ADMIN 185,782.00 187,373.63 0.00 (1,591.63) 100.9% CODE COMPLIANCE 519,825.00 347,651.80 0,00 172,173.20 66.9% ANIMAL CONTROL 198,155.00 117,698.10 0,00 80,456.90 59.4% BUILDING 815,371.00 544,473,72 0,00 270,897.28 66.8% EMERGENCY SERVICES 23,141.00 17,464.58 0.00 5,676.42 75.5% FIRE 27,278.00 2,445.88 0.00 24,832,12 9.0% CIVIC CENTER BUILDING -OPERATIONS 1,108,540.00 1,063,595.30 0.00 44,944,70 95.9% TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY 2,878,092.00 2,280,703.01 0.00 597,388.99 79.2% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -ADMIN 475,465,00 297,700.19 0.00 177,764.81 62.6% CURRENT PLANNING 905,200,00 438,689.23 1,528.65 464,982.12 48.5% TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,380,665.00 736,389,42 1,528,65 642,746.93 53.3% PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 215,080.00 174,914.60 0.00 40,165.40 81.3% DEVELOPMENT & TRAFFIC 825,251.33 555,324.93 0.00 269,92640 67.3% MAINT/OPERATIONS- STREETS 1,254,513.00 438,318.80 0.00 816,194.20 34.9% MAINT/OPERATIONS- LTG/LANDSCAPING 1,454,552.00 1,007,007.02 0.00 447,544.98 69.2% CAPITAL PROJECTS 485,663.00 124,098.15 0.00 361,564.85 25.6% TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 4,235,059.33 2,299,663.50 0.00 1,935,395.83 54.3% TRANSFERS OUT 2,205,785.00 131,092.22 0,00 2,074,692.78 5.9% GENE L FUND REIMBURSEMENTS (3,876,566.00) (2,494,536.16) 0,00 (1,382,029.84) 64.3% NET GtNERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 15,252,236,33 8,497,411.31 40,899.59 6,713,925.43 55.7% ig 008 CITY OF LA QL OTHER CITY Fi EXPENDITURE LIBRARY FUND: GAS TAX QUIMBY FUND: 07/01/2000 - 4/30/2001 REMAINING % BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% : GENERAL FUND 418,400.00 348,666.60 0.00 69,733.40 83.3% OUT 172,777.92 0.00 0.00 172,777.92 0.0% : GEI TOTAL GAS TAX 591,177,92 348,666,60 0,00 242 511.32 59.0% OUT 329,844,46 48,709.52 0,00 281 134.94 14.8% FUND: :OUT 13000000 0,00 0.00 130,000.00 0.0% SOUTH COAST AIR UALITY FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 5,700.00 6,340.00 0.00 (640.00) 111.2% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 5,700.00 6,340.00 0.00 (640.00) 111.2 % CMAQ/ISTEA TRANSFER OUT 2B7,423,00 0,00 0.00 287 423.00 0.0 VILLAGE PARKING LA QUINTA PUBLIC LLEBG FUND OUT 29,236.00 0.00 0.00 29 236.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% OUT 50,164,00 0 00 0,00 50 164.00 0.0% SLEF(COPS) TRAN FER OUT 30,100.00 62,435.31 0.00 (32 335.31) 207.4 LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DIST: REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 778,000,00 648,333.30 0.00 129,666.70 83.3% TRAN FER OUT 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL LTG/LANDSCAPING FUND 778,000.00 648,333.30 0,00 129 666.70 83.3% ASSESSMENT TION 46,700.00 0.00 0.00 46,700.00 0.0% GENERAL FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% OUT 6,684,610.25 4,567,818.60 0.00 2,116,791.66 68.3% TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE 6,731,310.25 4567,818.60 0.00 2,163,491.65 67.9% OFISSUANCE 0.00 25,889.39 0.00 (25,889.39) 0.0% FER TO AGENCY FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% FER OUT 2,188,059.00 0.00 0.00 2,188,059.00 0.0% TOTAL AD 2000-1 2,188,059.00 25,889.39 0.00 2,162,169.61 1.2% 79 ofiW CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2000 - 4/30/2001 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REMAINING % BY DEPARTMENT BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM COSTS 54,000.00 0.00 0.00 54,000.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 2,364,322.00 29,822.09 0.00 2,334,499.91 1.3% TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 2,418,322.00 29 822.09 0.00 2,388,499.91 1.2% PARKS & RECREATI N PROGRAM COSTS 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 2,020,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,020,000.00 0.0% TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 2,020,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,020,000.00 0.0% CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.0% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 203,700.00 169,750.00 0.00 33,950,00 83.3% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL CIVIC CENTER 203,700.00 169,750,00 0.00 33,950.00 83.3% LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 525,000.00 675.00 0.00 524,325.00 0.1% TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 525,000.00 675.00 0.00 524 325.00 0.1% COMMUNITY CENTER PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% STREET FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL STREET FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% PARK FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRW FER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL PARK FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND PROJE CT EXPENDITURES 44,105,134.64 9,414,295.01 5,200.00 34,685,639,63 21.3% PROJE CT REIMBURSEMENTS TO GEN FUND 1,088,679.54 161,793.80 0.00 926,885.74 14.9 % TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 45,193,814.18 9,576,088,81 5,200,00 35 612 525.37 21.2% ART IN PUBLIC PLA ES FUND PROJE CT EXPENSES 202,700.00 869.94 0.00 201,830.06 0.4% CIP E PENISES 443,839.08 158,436.37 0.00 285,402.71 35.7% TOTAL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES 646,539.08 159,306.31 0,00 487 232.77 24.6% LQ NORTE (97.1) CIP FUND PROJE CT EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% URBAN FORESTRY 3RANT TRANSFER OUT 1100000 0.00 0.00 11,000,00 0.0% EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND OPEPUJING EXPENSES 496,413.00 336,030.86 0.00 160 382.14 67.7% LOU 1 () 4 Qu&rcv AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: Authorization for Overnight Travel for PUBLIC HEARING: Two Members of the City Council to Attend the League of California Cities Annual Conf rence in Sacramento, California to be held September 12-15, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: Approve authorization for overnight travel for two members of the City Council to attend the League of California Cities Annual Conference in Sacramento, Calif ornia to be held September 12, 13, 14 and 15, 2001. low itures for this conference are estimated as follows: Registration $ 395 Travel $ 260 Hotel $ 550 Meals $ 275 Total $1,480 TOTAL (for two) $2,960 > for this conference attendance are available in the Legislative Program's ;I, Training and Meetings Account (#101-101-637-000)/ The eague of California Cities will be holding their annual conference, entitled "The Power of Cities — Strength in Numbers," at the Sacramento Convention Center. The first day will involve academy workshops for elected officials and city managers along with League policy committee meetings. The remaining days will feature the 24' Annual Expo, various business meetings, and a variety of program sessions on topics such as dealing with energy -related concerns, legal issues, public safety and emergency services (Attachment 1). Mayor Pena and Council Member Henderson have expressed an interest in attending this eetino. 31 The 1 `a 3 0 available to the City Council include: Approve authorization for overnight travel for two members of the City Council to attend the League of California Cities Annual Conference in Sacramento, California to be held September 12, 13, 14 and 15, 2001; or Do not approve the request for overnight travel; or Provide staff with alternative direction. ly submitted, I, Management Assistant Approved for submission by: ���/-;X�7 K'ely� Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 1 . League of California Cities Annual Conference Announcement 8� c&h. 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: I June 19, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: �T�M5 I�ITL.E: STUDY SESSION: _ Authorization for Overnight Travel for the Community PUBLIC HEARING: - Safety Manager to attend a Training Class given by the louthern California Association of Code Enforcement — Offic als, Inc., Anaheim, CA., June 22 and 23, 2001 Appr ve authorization for overnight travel for the Community Safety Manager to attend a training class given by the Southern California Association of Code Enforcement Officials, Inc., Anaheim, CA., June 22 and 23, 2001. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The raining will be funded from Travel, Training and Meetings Account #101-352- 637- 00. The breakdown of estimated expenditures for this class is as follows: • Registration $ 120 • Meals 30 • Travel 50 • Hotel 200 Total $ 400 This course will improve the skills and abilities of the Community Safety Manager in the Performance of his duties and ensure that the Code Compliance Department is oper ting within all legal requirements. Please see the attached page for course titles (Attachment 1). The alternatives available to City Council include: 1 . Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Community Safety Manager to attend a training class given by the Southern California Association of Code Enforcement Officials, Inc., Anaheim, CA., June 22 and 23, 2001; or 2. I Do not approve the request for overnight travel; or 3. 1 Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, l Tom Hartung, Buildin and Safety Director �Approved for submission by: 00 Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Class announcement 002 ATTACHMENTS 8- GO djujiJJjJI��li1J'M10JJJ0} ATTACHMENT 1 N [U� ^^G 1� � � 1 Y W5 � N � N N r Y y O 4 C C £ zz U N U 7 7 7 7 T7 ''"� • � ac7 fn Q y ^ LE =+ t 1 CO y O y v � v L ... U y u C z z E zz_ L L V L t2 O O O O O O J'JJ�:!'JJJ>1J1J�JJJ�IJJJ�l1j4JJ'JJJ�IJ!' SCACE Southern Cali ornia Association of Cocle Enfor _ement Officials, Inc. RO- Box 122 Downey, CA . 0240-0225 www.Scaceo. rg SCHEDULE OF EVENTS Breakfast 7:00 - 8:00Registration/Continental 8:00 - 12:00 Frofessional Certification Program 12:00 - 1:00 osted Lunch 1:00 5:00 Professional Certification Program No College Credit for Arrivals After 9:00 A.M. LOCATION TRAINING 809-d ♦'00/100'd Z66-1 860119£091 8 4 we99:80 IOOZ-II-unr Jun-11-2001 06:55am 760341TO98 T-992 P.002/002 F-508 L E o 0 0 '•E v c d ICI � ag d�C � e @ N - c' y g s o d E N f Q N N I d E .m 0:b a o -y o d $ A !� ON = ry N E VI O Wi= Qu m TO :�o v Q o c y : cc 9 mA -a 7M'� .'✓14 N 6 CO yJ c o � 0.9 a ._.. w � rn E M F .c Cn Om0 m - z=0: Z l" Vn O N Q o d Ec) jc2 N� olnoEaL QN � Z0oChL) G 1 R e N ^ � � 5 rd Z•rnU� 6 Oa>com 51 6p] p `Da ^L) a w m 3 c co E X m C<J 0 CJ m A N O 0. c C N r a 2 N C � 2 N � �� d rn s; ID y > N N q ch o T N U IL �N r,u _.=�? o `=3`0=�_"c»—✓`c.^ ^'cC•°�,o�'°-C'�= ^�i ,c.c-g`o--.v•YE ..G3 E c`. 3 t; 7 0 I: 3 �- e� 3 - •� Cam'. GN rc = O 3 GO ,u`.Lt :_7 �'y �- C'2 u.^ _ u `f _ 5 O-6 a( = W .• �L v v.G'y Yi �L C.� FL . 7 O y'= y"v i T O E ,-, F O.E�.,�G { ' ^ 3-.:-3 u �•'-0 -2' J C'O _ G 'T •.JT CA OD= C C V> G O _ OX u .•3 '; -5NT, o E oE o o c E N'O ,. Y L= _ c.... .: _•.._ o O vc' =''•=_E ° X t.Z'u cci E `c L =Ey r'. "3?m:J° E ^� '_;E " ;_=? in �_:�1 -L-7?n U N-O OLL —F C U 1-0y ��' u °'V •- u � - y.` u �'u 3 u u ., •�.o c Y.^ �� L .c E� V o'O= o ���� ^ v E 7�G=•^I=vF�LJ`'-'�°�'v�•✓::.v�� uv�aEi� >_ ?- E o - _a u u o �L- u u .J• w :: C F 7 E� u Q u vv• r u'> ;'� oA yam— .. o.o vv E._ „ E ? 2�•` ,. 3 v.9 �v'� i� `c 'J 2$ v E u in o y Vic= � - : Z = fJ v E F E r.^'3 ^ �.c ?'_ y� �L u .o•', c F = uC-, 3; L � u ou w.� c ..0 E > ��. ' E m� L P `u' 3=—'y-.; �'- � W V Y �C'�3' 6- a c .`� "fir- _.�vu •F c._ X= S. �d Z. v PC .y'. FQ H r •. �'� �•� 3 �'r o•>-r E`E C �'E o•-' Y_j vim` n'•ELcc E� v x .L• '? = s ram' L U .r'•.V E c= ? =j(( r.°•�` o'— V>. -' O E u F- >.❑ p 5 C cC ,.Zi w•_Z. u c n y —' E 3 ^•f 0_.X O'E 2 co! -=-_ �5 E O ., uSFbt:`==C m�� tSa d __=�?33^0 Q` w?••33�c3 uc'. i� v. L•O ^C. u L cq _ ✓ _ c� ti G VI_ v •✓'✓ ✓ O - U h.a� �i ..l r ■o E _ -rr E F c I O• 8 .`e v I G .. `e =° f 0= m� • o,_ u =` —GS t O 3 m c s c 2- c' O.O �' 'J S`'G F C �� `°"J O O'] O CV. G•E N N C C 5 4; r 1 Q 5 L :J2 —E3 ouu0c.s�a�V� g.��o- s=nl3 Q='S 5�h3c�•'-� Tit!t 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: _ COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Approval of a Change Order with Ray Lopez PUBLIC HEARING: _ Associates for Eisenhower Park Improvements RECOMMENDATION: Approve a change order with Ray Lopez Associates for Eisenhower Park in the amount of $43,081 .76 for the expansion of Eisenhower Park. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The additional cost associated with expanding Eisenhower Park totals $43,081. 6. Funds for this project are available in Account #401-656-695-553. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: On May 1, 2001, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement ith Ray Lopez Associates for design/build services for three mini parks. These parks included the Bottlebrush/Sagebrush/Saguaro park site, the property donated to the City by Mr. Meyran and expansion of Eisenhower Park. The Professional Services Agreement stated that improvements to Eisenhower Park would include upgrading the play equipment and existing amenities. However, at the May 1, 2001 City Council meeting, the City Council approved the use of the City owned lot north of the existing park as provided in Attachment 1. The design of the additional park land will be passive in nature. The plan for this area will be brought forward for City Council consideration at a future City Council meeti g. Attachment 2 is a change order for the expansion of Eisenhower Park in the amount of $43,081.76. The amount for this project includes the following: Approved Capital Improvement Project: $340,720.00 i Original design/build contract: $247,712.48 Change Order#1: $ 43,081.76 Total design/build contract: $290,079.24 The remaining amount includes administrative costs and testing that are required for this project. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve a change order with Ray Lopez Associates for Eisenhower Park Improvements in the amount of $43,081.76 for the expansion of Eisenhower Park; or 2. Do not approve a change order with Ray Lopez Associates for Eisenhower Park Improvements in the amount of $43,081.76 for the expansion of Eisenhower Park; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully isubmitted, Hory Attachments: 1 2 nity Services Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager '�� Minutes of May 1 City Council Meeting Change Order for Expansion of Eisenhower Park 00 S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.122.Change Order Eishenhower Park.wpd ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Minutes 9 May 1, 2001 Council Member Sniff expressed his problem supporting the designs because it places too much on the vehicle. He suggested a narrower mountain range. Council Member Perkins suggested Design B without "City of La Quinta" on the back side panel and with La Quinta on the tailgate. Mayor Pena and Council Member Adolph concurred. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Perkins/Henderson to approve Design B as modified (removing "City of La Quinta" from the back side panel), approve a budget of up to $17,700 for incorporation into the FY 2001 /2002 Budget, and direct staff to negotiate with an expert company0es) to complete all necessary work. Motion carried with Council Member Sniff voting NO. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2001-57. 5. CONSIDERATION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH RAY LOPEZ ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN/BUILD SERVICES FOR THREE MINI PARKS. Community .Services Director Horvitz presented the staff report. Joan Rebich, 53-810 Avenida Cortez, commented on the high use of Eisenhower Park and spoke in support of its expansion. Council Member Henderson expressed concern about expanding the park because of potential parking problems similar to what has happened at Adams Park. She noted a mini -park in the northwest section of the Cove has been discussed in the past. She supported building a mini -park at the Saguaro/Bottlebrush site and at the Temecula/Velasco site and supported improvements to Eisenhower Park at its current size. Council Member Sniff stated he would like to see additional mini -parks in the Cove every two years and supported expanding the Eisenhower Park to four lots as was originally planned. Council Member Adolph agreed and noted more open space is needed in the Cove to offset the increasing density. Mayor Pena suggested either selling the lots adjacent to Eisenhower Park and Purchasing lots elsewhere in the Cove for an additional mini -park or finding a more passive use for the lots. ME 004 City Council Minutes 10 May 1, 2001 Council Member Sniff agreed with designing a more passive use with grass only. Mayor Pena suggested adding a few benches (not picnic tables) and leaving some of the area in its natural state to discourage parties. In response to Mayor Pena, City Manager Genovese confirmed the contract with Ray Lopez Associates can be modified to include a passive design for the lots adjacent to Eisenhower Park and a drawing brought back to Council for review. Council concurred. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to approve a Professional Services Agreement with Ray Lopez Associates for design/build services for three mini -parks to include remodeling and upgrading Eisenhower Park. A passive design on the vacant lot north of the existing park is to come back to Council for approval. To design and build a mini -park at the western boundaries of Saguaro and Bottlebrush Drives and at the northwest corner of Calle Temecula and Avenida Velasco on property donated by Mr. Meyran. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2001-58. 6. CONSIDERATION OF MODIFICATIONS TO THE DEMARTINO ART PIECE LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND HIGHWAY 111.. Community Services Director Horvitz presented the staff report. In response to Council Member Henderson, Ms. Horvitz stated the artist contends the gem material will be more durable than the existing gem. The artist also proposes to set the aquamarine color gem on brackets extended from the mountains and additional lighting above and below the entire art piece. Council Member Sniff noted a light fixture window already exists under the gem to illuminate the Lucite material. Mayor Pena questioned the need for additional lighting except for a light to illuminate the gem. Council concurred. Council Member Henderson stated she wished to have some assurance on the durability of the gem material. 91 005 ATTACHMENT 2 c&ty/ 4 4 Q" Sheet 1 of 1 PROJECT NO. 2000-01 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT: PARK IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONSULTANT: RAY LOPEZ ASSOCIATES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 Pursuant to the terms of the original Contract Agreement, you are hereby directed to make the herein described changes or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications for this Contract. Unless otherwise stated all work shall conform to the terms, general conditions, and special provisions of the original Contract. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: Design a passive use area in the City owned lots north of Eisenhower Park. This area is to include up to two benches, one trash receptacle and native vegetation. Design is to allow for a six foot or more buffer zone between the park and the residence north of the park site. Appropriate irrigation is required. Some turf may be incorporated into the design if appropriate. Appropriate fencing will be continued on both the east and west sides of the expanded park site. Final design of the park will be approved by City Council before implementation. Previous Contract Amount Through Change Order No. 0 $ 247,713 Add/Deduct this Change Order S 43,082 Revised Contract Total $ 290,795 By reason of this contract change order the time of completion is adjusted as follows: 21 days added to contract time. The original contract completion date shall be: 11/25/01 Submitted Approved We, the undersigned Consultant, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, perform all labor, except as may be noted above, and perform all services necessary to complet he above spLLecified work, and hereby accept as full payment the amount shown above. Accepted By: cnnv.,—nitv Services\Mini Park Design and Constmction\Rl -01. Pd r t \ t P 'M 4r I COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 Approval of Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Costs (PS&E) and Authorize Staff to Receive Bids for Citywide Street Improvements, Project 2000-04 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 7 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimates (PS&E) and authorize staff to advertise the bid of CIP Project 2000-04, Citywide Street Improvements. The following represents the available funding and funding sources for the individual projects identified within the Citywide Street and Sidewalk Improvements, Project No. 2000-04: Project Funding Source Available Avenue 50 Low Water Crossing Interim DIF Transportation $373,695 Improvement Sagebrush Drive Sidewalk Improvements City Infrastructure $71,507 Street and Sidewalk Improvements on Dune SB 821 Funds $32,400 Palms Road RDA PA # 2 $76,083 Washington Street Sidewalk and Sound RDA PA # 1 $35,000 Wall Improvements City Infrastructure $57,435 Developer Cont. $40,000 Transportation DIF $54,000 Calle Tampico, Park Avenue and Avenue BLA Account $30,600 50 Bikeway Improvements RDA PA # 2 $145,547 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING: $916,267 Based upon the Engineer's estimated construction costs in the amount of $414,578.00, the following represents the probable project construction budget: 93 T: W WDEMCOUNCI L\2001 \010619e. wpd Avenue 50 Low Water Crossing Interim Improvement: Sagebrush Drive Sidewalk Improvements: Street and Sidewalk Improvements on Dune Palms Road: Washington Street Sidewalk Improvements and Sound Wall: Calle Tampico, Park Avenue and Avenue 50 Bikeway Improvements Sub -Total Engineer's Estimated Construction Costs: Inspection/Testing Administration Subtotal Contingency: $119,189 $48,791 $87,728 $80,663 $78,207 $414,578 $40,421 $20,729 $475,728 $47 573 Total Anticipated Costs: $523,301 As illustrated, sufficient funding exists within the project budget to support the staff recommendation. The project is partially funded with State Funds and RDA Project Area Funds. The project is required to be bid specifying prevailing wages; therefore, there are no Charter City implications On July 5, 2000, the City Council approved and adopted the Fiscal Year 2000/2001 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The following CIP projects were included: Avenue 50 Low Water Crossing Interim Improvement, Project No. 2000-04; Sagebrush Drive Sidewalk Improvements, Project No. 2000-08; and sidewalks and handicap ramps at various locations within the City. In addition to the aforementioned projects, on May 16, 2000 the City Council authorized staff to submit an application for SB 821 Funds, in the amount of $32,400.00, to develop street and sidewalk improvements near the La Quinta High School. The application for the SB 821 projects included improvements along the east side of Dune Palms Road from the Whitewater River Channel to Westward Ho Drive, along the west side of Dune Palms Road 400' north of Westward Ho Drive, and on the north side of Westward Ho Drive 100' west of Dune Palms Road. The proposed SB 821 sidewalk projects were not included in the CIP, since the result of the grant 94 T:\PW0EPT\C0UNC1L\2001 \010619e.wpd 002 application was unknown during the development of the CIP. The total amount of the SB 821 Grant was $32,400, with the City's match in the amount of $76,083 to be funded by RDA Project Area No. 2 funds. The additional appropriations from RDA Project Area No. 2 Funds are required as a City matching funding source in order to qualify for the SB 821 Funds for the Dune Palms Road street and sidewalk improvements. The combined projects will provide the following: Avenue 50 Low Water Crossing Interim Improvements (Project No. 2000-04). The interim improvement will widen the existing low water crossing on Avenue 50 spanning the La Quinta Evacuation Channel from two to four lanes. The improvements will also include a 6' paved asphalt path on the east side of Washington Street from Saguaro Drive to Avenue 50, and a 6' paved asphalt path on Avenue 50 from Washington Street for a distance of approximately 1,300 linear feet east of Washington Street to join with the existing concrete sidewalk on the north side of Avenue 50 fronting the Sports Complex. 2. Sagebrush Drive Sidewalk Improvement (Project No. 2000-08). This project shall include the installation of sidewalk and handicap ramps on the north side of Sagebrush Drive from Washington Street to approximately 1,260 LF east of Washington Street joining with the existing sidewalk within the Rancho La Quinta development. 3. Street and sidewalk improvements on Dune Palms Road. The improvements include the installation of sidewalks on three segments near the La Quinta High School. The sidewalk improvements include an 8' meandering sidewalk on the north side of Westward Ho Drive from Dune Palms Road west approximately 100 LF, and an 8' meandering sidewalk on the west side of Dune Palms Road from Westward Ho Drive north approximately 400 LF. Dune Palms Road shall be improved to its ultimate width, including curb and gutter on the west side of Dune Palms Road from Westward Ho north approximately 400 LF. 4. Washington Street sidewalk and sound wall improvements. This project shall include a 6' sidewalk and acoustical wall on the west side of Washington Street from Avenida La Fonda to Avenue 52. 5. Calle Tampico, Park Avenue, and Avenue 50 Bike Lane Improvements: This project shall install on and off street bike lanes along the three identified City Streets. On October 3, 2000, the City Council added the Dune Palms Road Street and Sidewalk Improvement Project to the Fiscal Year 2000/2001 CIP; authorized staff to combine the following projects and their respective budgets into a single combined Citywide 95 Street and Sidewalk Improvement Project: Avenue 50 Low Water Crossing Interim 0O? TAPW OEPT\COUNCIL\2001 \010619e.wpd Improvement, Project No. 2000-04; Sagebrush Drive Sidewalk Improvement, Project No. 2000-08; Street and Sidewalk Improvements on Dune Palms Road, Project No. (Unassigned); and Washington Street Sidewalk Improvement, Project No. (Unassigned); and authorized staff to distribute a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of plans, specifications, and engineer's estimates for the combined Citywide Street and Sidewalk Improvements; and approved the Consultant Selection Committee. On December 5, 2001, the City Council appropriated funds in the amount of $32,400 from SB 821 Funds toward the Dune Palms Road Street and Sidewalk Improvements; and approved a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) in the amount of $29,046 with The Keith Companies to prepare the plans, specifications and engineer's estimate for the Citywide Street and Sidewalk Improvements, Project No. 2000-04. On December 5, 2001, the Redevelopment Agency appropriated funds in the amount of $76,083 from RDA Project Area No. 2 Fund toward the Dune Palms Road Street and Sidewalk Improvements. On April 17, 2001, the City Council appropriated funds in the amount of $30,600 from Bike Lane Account (BLA) Funds toward the Bikeway Improvements; and approved a Contract Amendment in the amount of $8,000 to The Keith Companies' Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to prepare plans, specifications and engineer's estimate for Bikeway Improvements on Calle Tampico, Park Avenue and Avenue 50, contingent upon the additional appropriation of funds by the RDA. On April 17, 2001, the Redevelopment Agency appropriated funds in the amount of $145,547 from RDA Project Area No. 2 Funds toward the Bikeway Improvements, contingent upon approval of Contract Amendment No.1 by the City Council. On May 15, 2001, the City Council authorized the City Manager to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding for a 50% cost share ($40,000) for an acoustic wall on the west side of Washington Street from Avenida La Fonda to Avenue 52 with Tradition Club Associates, LLC (Tradition), contingent upon approval of the wording by the City Attorney; and approved an appropriation in an amount not to exceed $54,000 from Account No. 250-000-300-290, Transportation Developer Impact Fee (DIF). The plans, specifications and engineer's estimate (PS&E) are now complete and are available for review within the Public Works Department. 0114 TA WDEPT\COUNCIL\2001 \01 061 99.wpd Assuming authorization to receive bids on June 19, 2001, the following represents how the project is expected to proceed: Approval of PS&E/Authorization to Receive Bids Bid Period Approval to Award Construction Construction Period (90 days) Accept Improvements June 19, 2001 June 20, 2001 - July 19, 2001 August 7, 2001 August 20, 2001 - November 18, 2001 December 2001 The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimates (PS&E) and authorize staff to advertise the bid of CIP Project 2000-04, Citywide Street Improvements; or 2. Do not approve the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimates (PS&E) and do not authorize staff to advertise the bid of CIP Project 2000-04, Citywide Street Improvements; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Chris A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for Submission by: Thomas P. Genovese City Manager 97 TAMDEMCOUNCU2001 \010619e.wptl 0,05 T4'lvl 4 4� Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Approval to Award a Contract to Construct Traffic Signal Improvements at Calle Tampico/Avenida PUBLIC HEARING: Bermudas, Project 2000-17 Authorize an additional appropriation in the amount of $42,000.00 from the Transportation Developer Impact Fee (DIF) Account; and Award a contract in the amount of $143,161 .00 to DBX, Inc. for the construction of Project 2000-17, Calle Tampico at Avenida Bermudas Traffic Signal Improvements. The following funding sources are available: Funding Source Transportation DIF Account Number 401-000-709-000 TOTAL: Less Prior Expenditure: Remaining Funds Available: Amount $150,000.00 $150,000.00 ($13 954,28) $136,045.72 Considering the construction award amount of $143,161.00, the following represents the recommended project construction budget: Estimated Construction Costs: Inspection/Testing: Administration: Subtotal: Contingency: Total Anticipated Costs: $143,161 $11,095 $7,158 $161,414 $16,141 $177,555 T:\PW DEPT\COUNCIL\2001 \010619c.wpd e* As illustrated, the total probable construction related costs for this project is estimated to be $177,555. As of July 1, 2001, the amount available for this project is $136,046. A shortfall exists in the amount of $41,509. Sufficient funding exists within the City's Transportation Developer Impact Fee Account to cover this shortfall. The project is 100% funded with local developer impact fees. Subsequently, the project was bid without prevailing wage requirements. This project includes the construction and installation of a new traffic signal at the intersection of Calle Tampico and Avenida Bermudas. On August 8, 2000, staff issued an informal Request for Proposals (RFP) to obtain Professional Engineering and Design Services for the Calle Tampico at Avenida Bermudas Traffic Signal Improvement Project. On September 12, 2000, a purchase order in the amount of $5,200.00 was issued to Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. to prepare the plans, specifications and engineer's estimate (PS&E) for the new traffic signal at the intersection of Calle Tampico and Avenida Bermudas. On May 1, 2001, the City Council approved the Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) and authorized staff to advertise the bid of CIP Project 2000-17, Calle Tampico at Avenida Bermudas Traffic Signal Improvements. On Tuesday, May 29, 2001, sealed bids were received for the construction of this project. The following table illustrates the results of the bids received (a detailed bid comparison summary is provided as Attachment 1). Engineer's Estimate: $135,850.00 DBX, Inc. $143,161.00 Steiny & Co. $149,203.80 Moore Electrical Contractors $159,153.00 As indicated, DBX, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive bid for the proposed traffic signal improvements. Considering the City Council awards the project for construction on June 19, 2001, 99 the following project schedule is anticipated: n O 0�. T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2001\010619c. wPd Contract Award: Sign Contract/Mobilize: Construction Period (90 days): Project Acceptance/Close out: June 19, 2001 July 6, 2001 July 9, 2001 - October 8, 2001 November 2001 The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Authorize an additional appropriation in the amount of $42,000.00 from the Transportation Developer Impact Fee (DIF) Account; and Award a contract in the amount of $143,161.00 to DBX, Inc. for the construction of Project 2000- 17, Calle Tampico at Avenida Bermudas Traffic Signal Improvements; or 2. Do not authorize an additional appropriation in the amount of $42,000.00 from the Transportation Developer Impact Fee (DIF) Account; and do not award a contract in the amount of $143,161.00 to DBX, Inc. for the construction of Project 2000-17, Calle Tampico at Avenida Bermudas Traffic Signal Improvements; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Chris A. vog Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for Submission by: Thomas P. Genovese City Manager Attachments: 1. Bid Comparison Summary 100 T:\PW DE"\COUNCIL\2001 \010619c.wpa 003 Attachment 1 8888888888888888888888888 S' Y)MNMM HgNMNl�kill MHMMN o w tW N yyp W f� e H8 o 0 o c S.8.8.88 e O cNNNNN c 8. c o 0 0 8.888.8H 0 0 8. 0 8. o pO 8p ppO�OOH nOH 8O 8H 8O �8. �8.8OH 2 MNMN N NN I.IN N�NyNNN J 8888888 OOI(Op 8{qO� pm! Y Q888t88888N W YI m AyPy��N �- p888 pppp {�pp V, yPy�� yy ��yy ppp� ��yy pp V � N N{ T w 88_y$888888888p8Vgp�pNypyH88888p88H H N(ppNNOt�IDNNNI»pp��(EN(yyD_IAMO 7 pp pp pp pp pp88pp888 8S8 8 pp8pp8. pp pp pp8. 8 8 88. pp 8 pp S. Q0pOp��O0Q(�lO 88 8O 8O 8O 8O (O iCQNOpO 8 8 8 lN(l�G1000QYlY 8 8 8 � yMyMN »�HNNt�MNNMNYINMN�N,1 ymy �N�yy �W y� M (W_ g pp QOQ p QOQ p SO5��QOQ p p OOOOOOO p p p �ii��25 p p p pN yOy�� p 5O� p p gO OOOOSO5�� gN'irr�gry p p p p p SO5��QOQOSO5��O p p p p 25 MM�M 2q5 25 25 7i:�1.'�G l�N Girl NMNM�N 252575a dS� 2 7 s8888.$8.8.s888.8.8.8.8$8888888s FRky8tVl oOp .�pp ryV {ppYpYY ryV ryV NW WC pp pp pp pp pp pp OO8. pp pp pp OO pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp pp . pp .. O �W 80808O8OypO) OtD Np NtO ry�I�fryOp (p8.(y8.O8S N(O InfIOOMHNyHO10OO 80000 pppp8.O8O8088.8. W = NMNHVYl1MNMMNMN� N yNyNNM ryOO O pp pp mPe- uri E w s QQQQ W W W QQ W W aaQQaatt``QQQQQQ aa aaQQ�/J E O C O O O q� U m U!if LL.4 .V qg b rn ; is K r U;�;� C C O W O WPM- aLL �� yLL�LL_ 3' C C S i qm m (q bbb �E �d C� LL 3a , 5 IL o C m��uLLi� eioa32CC 6i'� EE �s h� 5 ,y rrrrra�LLaN�Swni�iv a'rc rciA r FyO�NPIQ YI tO ntO W O�NOlQ NfO I�OJN ON .- N NgO N N 101 TtuY 4 4Qx!"tw AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: _ Acceptance of Project No. 2001-01, Miles Avenue Soil Export Project PUBLIC HEARING: _ Accept Project No. 2001-01, Miles Avenue Soil Export Project as 100% complete; and Authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and Authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $16,468.50, 35 days after the Notice of Completion is recorded. Adequate funds are available in the Low and Moderate Housing Tax Increment Fund, Project Area No. 2 ( Account No. 246-906-684-000 ) to pay the contractor retention. Based upon the low bid in the amount of $161,685, the following represented the recommended project construction budget: Construction Costs: Inspection/Testing/Survey: Archeological Monitor Administration: Subtotal: Contingency (10%): Total Anticipated Costs: $161,685.00 $14,956.00 $10, 000.00 $8,832.00 $195,473.00 $19,547.00 $215,020.00 102 TNP DEPT\COUNCIL\2001 NO 106190.wpa The actual costs for this project are as follows: Inspection/Testing/Survey $3,484.00 Archaeological Monitor/Fringe Toed Lizard Fee $7,470.00 Administration $8,832.00 Misc. Supplies/Sign $550.65 Original Bid $161,685.00 Change Order #1 - Early Completion Bonus (10 days@$300/day) $3,000.00 Total Costs $185,021 .65 Sufficient funds were available within the Low and Moderate Housing Tax Increment Fund, Project Area No. 2 to cover the project costs. Since RDA funding is being utilized for this project, the City bid the project with prevailing wage requirements. Therefore, there are no Charter City implications. On February 20, 2001, the City Council approved the appropriation of $7,200 from the Low and Moderate Housing Tax Increment Fund, Project Area No. 2 (Account No. 246-906-684-000), for the survey and engineering services to remove and relocate a portion of the soil to be used at the Civic Center Campus and to mitigate the blow sand into the Inco Homes development by spreading the remainder on site, and authorized the Executive Director to execute a purchase order for the professional services contracts. On March 19, 2001, the project was advertised for bid. The project consisted of grading the site to plan contours, or as needed to spread the remaining dirt on site and the export of approximately 8,000 cubic yards of dirt to the City's Civic Center Campus site. An organic dust pallative was applied to all disturbed areas of both sites, and a sand fence was installed at the Miles Avenue Borrow Site. An Archaeological Monitor was present on site to monitor the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A pre -bid conference was held on 103 QUZ T \MDEMCOUNCII\2001\010619b.wpd March 21,2001, with a bid opening date of March 29, 2001. On April 3, 2001 the City Council acted to declare G & M Construction's bid as non- responsive and rejected their bid accordingly; and awarded a contract in the amount of $ 161,685.00 to Cooley Construction, Inc. for Project No. 2001-01 Miles Avenue Soil Export Project. A Notice to Proceed was issued on April 17, 2001, with the first contract day beginning on April 26, 2001, and a completion date of May 25, 2001. The project was deemed complete on May 11, 2001 . Therefore the contractor was entitled to an Early Completion Incentive as set forth in the Project Specifications. The project's construction effort is now deemed to be 100% complete and is in compliance with the plans and specifications. Prior to filing the Notice of Completion, staff must receive authorization from the City Council to approve this project as 100% complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion. The following is a summary of Final Accounting of this Contract Original Bid $161,685.00 Change Order # 1 Early Completion $3,000.00 Total $164, 685.00 Amount Paid to Date ($148,216.50) RETENTION TO BE RELEASED $16,468.50 Sufficient funds are available for project close out. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Accept Project No. 2001-01, Miles Avenue Soil Export Project as 100% complete; and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $16,468.50, 35 days after the Notice of Completion is recorded; or 104 003 T:\P W DEPT\COUNCIL\2001 \010619b.wpd 2. Do not accept Project No. 2001-01,Miles Avenue Soil Export Project as 100% complete; and do not authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and do not authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $16,468.50, 35 days after the Notice of Completion is recorded; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Chris A. VOA Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 105 T:\MDEPT\COUNCIL\2001\0106190.wpd 004 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: Ia ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Adoption of a Resolution Granting Conditional Approval of a Final Map and Subdivision PUBLIC HEARING: _ Improvement Agreement for Tract 29894-2, Country Club of the Desert, NRI-CCP I, a Delaware Limited Liability Company Adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 29894-2, Country Club of the Desert, NRI-CCP I, a Delaware Limited Liability Company. None. None. Tract 29894-2 is located east of Jefferson Street, west of Monroe Street, north of Avenue 54 and south of Avenue 52. This is a subdivision of a portion of section 9 and the south half of section 10, Township 6 south, Range 7 east, San Bernardino Meridian, (Attachment 1), it consists of 346 numbered lots and 8 lettered lots (Attachment 2). The developer has requested the City Council's conditional approval of the Final Map which will allow 30 days for completion of its processing. As of June 11, 2001, City staff has not received approval of the Final Map from the City's Acting Surveyor; however, it is expected that a technically correct map will be submitted within the time allowed with its conditional approval. A Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Attachment 3) has been executed by the developer; however, the associated securities have not been received. As a result, City staff has prepared the attached Resolution which provides for conditional approval of the Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement. The ] Q 6 T:TW D EMSTAMLI N DSEY\TFACTS\29894-2\010619,wpd approval is contingent upon receipt, within 30 days (July 19, 2001), of a technically correct Final Map suitable for recording by the County Recorder with all required signatures except for the City Clerk. Once these items are received, the City Clerk will affix the City Seal to the Final Map and offer the Final Map for recording by the County Recorder. If any of the required items are not received by City staff within the specified time frame, the Final Map will be considered disapproved and will be rescheduled for City Council consideration only after all required items have been received. The developer has demonstrated to City staff that sufficient progress has been made with the documents required for conditional final map approval. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 29894-2, Country Club of the Desert, NRI-CCP I, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 29894-2, Country Club of the Desert, NRI-CCP I, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Chris A. Vo Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Tract Map 3. Subdivision Improvement Agreement 107 002 T:\MDEPT\STAFF\LINDSE V\TRACTS\298942\010619.wpE RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING CONDITIONAL FINAL MAP APPROVAL OF TRACT 29894-2, AND AUTHORIZING A TIME EXTENSION FOR SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO VALIDATE THE APPROVAL WHEREAS, the City Council conducts only two regular meetings per month and the time interval between these meetings occasionally creates an undue hardship for business enterprises and individuals seeking approval of subdivision maps, and WHEREAS, the City Council as a matter of policy allows a subdivider to have city staff present the map for approval consideration when the requisite items necessary for final map approval are nearly, but not completely, finished thus yielding to the subdivider additional production time for preparation of those items, and WHEREAS, the subdivider has demonstrated to city staff and the City Council that it has made sufficient progress with items required for final map approval, and it is reasonable to expect the subdivider to satisfactorily complete the items, including city staff review time, within thirty (30) days without adversely impacting other ongoing work commitments of city staff, and WHEREAS, Section 66458(b) of the Subdivision Map Act grants the City Council broad authority to authorize time extensions regarding final map approval, or disapproval, upon receiving it for consideration, and WHEREAS, the City Council relies on professional city staff to review all required items for conformance with relevant requirements, and it is therefore appropriate for the City Council to approve the final map subject to review and confirmation of the required items by professional city staff, within a reasonable period of time as specified by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: Section 1. The final map for Tract 29894-2, is conditionally approved provided the subdivider submits all required items on or before July 19, 2001. 103 onI Resolution No. 2001- Tract 29894-2 Adopted: June 19, 2001 Page 2 Section 2. The City Council's approval of the final map shall not be considered valid until the City Engineer has signed the map indicating that it conforms with the tentative map, the Subdivision Map Act and all ordinances of the City. Section 3. The City Engineer shall withhold his signature from the map until the subdivider has completed the following requirements to the City Engineer's satisfaction. A. Produced a technically correct drawing of the map area that is suitable for recording by the County Recorder B. Has obtained all requisite signatures on the map title page, except for the City Clerk's signature. Section 4. The City Clerk shall withhold affixing the City Seal to the map title page, along with her attesting signature, until the City Engineer has signed the map. Section 5. The time extension for satisfying the requirements of the conditional approval for this final map shall expire when City offices close for regular business on July 19, 2001. If the subdivider has not satisfied the requirements in Section 3, herein, by the expiration deadline, the final map shall be considered disapproved. Disapproval does not deny any rights the subdivider may have under the Map Act to resubmit the final map for approval, or disapproval. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 19th day of June, 2001, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Council Members NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 109 004 Resolution No. 2001- Tract 29894-2 Adopted: June 19, 2001 Page 3 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON , City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 110 0+915 ATTACHMENT 2 Tract Map 29894-2 To Be Provided 112 008 Attachment 3 CITY OF LA QUINTA SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT Tract 29894 -2 THIS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this day of 2001, by and between NRI - CCP I, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company,(Country Club of the Desert), hereinafter referred to as "Subdivider," and the City of La Quinta, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City." RECITALS: A. Subdivider has prepared and filed a final map or parcel map (the "Map") of a unit of land in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, which unit of land is known as Tract No. 29894-2 (the "Tract") pursuant to the provisions of Section 66410, et sec. of the California Government Code (the "Subdivision Map Act"). B. Prior to approval of the Map, Subdivider is required to install or agree to install certain public and private improvements (the "Improvements"). C. The Improvements have not been installed and accepted at this time. D. It is therefore necessary that Subdivider and City enter into an agreement for the installation of the Improvements as provided in Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Improvement Plans. Prior to submittal of the Map for approval by the City Council, Subdivider shall furnish original improvement plans meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. 2. Improvements. Subdivider shall construct the public and private street, drainage, utility, landscaping, and other improvements required to be constructed or agreed to be constructed under this Agreement as listed in Exhibit "A", and shall bear the full cost thereof. The methods, standards, specifications, sequence, and scheduling of construction shall be as approved by the City Engineer. 3. Improvement Security. A. One class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "performance security, shall assure the faithful performance of this Agreement including construction of the Improvements, payment of Subdivider's fair share of Improvements which have been or will be constructed by others ("Participatory Improvements"), and payment of plan check and permit fees. A second class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "payment security," shall assure the payment of the cost of labor, equipment and materials supplied to construct the Improvements. A third class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "warranty security," shall serve as a guarantee and warranty of the Improvements for a period of one year following the completion and acceptance of the Improvements. Subdivider shall furnish performance and payment security prior to and as a condition of City Council approval of the Map. Subdivider shall provide warranty security after Improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council and prior to or concurrently with the final release of performance security. Warranty security shall, not be required for Monumentation or Participatory Improvements. However, the City may utilize Monumentation Security for performance of or payment for the work in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. As part of the obligation secured by each of the performance security, payment security and warranty security, and in addition to the face amount of each such security, each such security shall include and assure the payment of costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing the obligations thereby secured. B. Improvement security shall conform with Section 66499 of the California Government Code and one or more of the following: 113 1) A cash deposit with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company, at City's option. 009 T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEY\TRACTS\29894-2\S I Agraement.wpd Page 1 of 6 2) Surety bonds, of the form specified in subsection 66499.2 of the California Government Code, issued by a surety or sureties listed in the U.S. Department of Treasury Circular 570 (latest version). 3) Certificates of deposit, in City's name, from one or more financial institutions subject to regulation by the state or federal government and having a financial quality rating of "A" or better and a commitment reliability rating of "R-2" or better on the Investment Data Exchange (of the Los Angeles County Treasurer's office). 4) Irrevocable letters of credit, issued by one or more financial institutions meeting the requirements of Paragraph (3), pledging that the funds necessary to carry out the completion of the Improvements are on deposit, guaranteed for payment, and constitute a trust fund which is not subject to levy or attachment by any creditor of the depositor until released by City. Letters of credit shall guarantee that all or any portion of the funds available pursuant to the letters of credit will be paid upon the written demand of City and that such written demand need not present documentation of any type as a condition of payment, including proof of loss. The duration of any such letter of credit shall be for a period of not less than one year from the execution of the agreement with which it is provided and shall state, on its face, that the letter of credit will be automatically renewed until such time that City authorizes its expiration or until sixty (60) days after City receives notice from the financial institution of intent to allow expiration of the letter of credit. 5) A lien upon the subdivided property, if City finds that it would not be in the public interest to require the installation of the Improvements sooner than two (2) years after recordation of the final map or parcel map for which the Improvements are required. The lien shall provide a collateral value of three (3) times the estimated cost of the Improvements and shall include the power of sale of the real property, all buildings and improvements thereon, or that may be erected upon or made thereto, together with all hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in any wise appertaining, and the reservations, remainders, rents, issues, and profits thereof. The collateral value of the property shall be established at Subdivider's expense through an appraisal approved by City. 6) An instrument of credit from an agency of the state, federal or local government, when any agency of the state, federal, or local government provides at least Twenty Percent (20%) of the financing for the Improvements. 7) When Subdivider is a non-profit organization, security may be negotiable bonds, of the kind approved for securing deposits of public moneys with City or in favor of City, as specified in Section 16430 of the California Government Code, deposited, at City's option, with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company. C. All securities shall be furnished in accordance with the provisions of Exhibit A. The amount of the performance security shall equal One Hundred Percent (100%) of the estimated cost of constructing the Improvements, including payment of plan check and permit fees, as estimated by the City Engineer or a duly authorized representative of the City Engineer. The amount of Payment security shall equal the amount of the amount of performance security, except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A, and shall be furnished as a separate security. Warranty security shall equal Ten Percent (10%) of the amount of performance security except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A. D. At the time of submittal of security, Subdivider shall pay to City administrative fees applicable to the form of security provided. Administrative fees shall apply to the subdivision (final map, parcel map or waiver of parcel mapj rather than to individual security instruments. The fees shall be paid separately for each different form and/or source (surety or financial institution) of security initially submitted and for substitution of securities but shall not be required for submittal of warranty security if the warranty security is of the same form and from the same source as the performance security it replaces. Administrative fees for security shall be as follows: 1) For certificates of deposit, bonds and letters of credit as described in Paragraphs 2), 3) and 4) of SECTION 3.B., which require the establishment of evidence of the reliability of the surety or financial institution, the administrative fee shall be One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00). 2) For liens on real property as described in Paragraph 5) of SECTION 3.B., for which City will prepare lien agreements and subordination agreements, administer valuation of the real property and administer the agreements over the life of the lien, all of which require legal assistance and financial advice, Subdivider shall pay to City an administration fee of One Half of One Percent (0.5%) of the estimated cost of the improvements 11 secured but not less than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) nor more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00). t�ln 1: J T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEV\TRACTS\29694-2\S I Agreement.wpd Page 2 of 6 3) For other forms of security listed in Section 3 B, above, there will be no administrative fee. E. Participatory Improvements, if any, are identified in Exhibit A. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place until the Participatory Improvements are constructed and actual costs are known and paid by Subdivider, or until Subdivider pays to City the estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements, and shall guarantee the reimbursement by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost of the Participatory Improvements. Payment security and warranty security shall not be required for Participatory Improvements. Upon written demand from City, Subdivider shall deposit cash with City in lieu of or in replacement of security guaranteeing Participatory Improvements. If Subdivider fails to deposit said cash within 30 days of the date of the written demand from City, City may present a written demand to Subdivider's Surety for payment of said cash and Subdivider's Surety shall pay to City the lesser of: 1) the amount demanded, or 2) the amount of the security. F. Security shall not expire, be reduced or become wholly or partially invalid for any reason, including non-payment of premiums, modifications of this Agreement and/or expiration of the time for performance stated in this Agreement, without express authorization from City unless the surety provides City with sixty (60) days written notice by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. G. Security shall be released in the following manner: 1) Performance security shall be released upon the final completion and acceptance or approval, by the City Council of the Improvements subject to the provisions of paragraph B. 2) The City Engineer may authorize partial reduction of performance security as work progresses, upon application by Subdivider. However, no such reduction shall be for an amount less than Ten Percent (10%) of the total performance security provided for the faithful performance of the act or work. In no event shall security be reduced below that required to guarantee the completion of the act or work or obligation secured, plus Ten Percent (10%). The City Engineer shall not allow more than two partial reductions of security furnished for any improvement agreement. 3) Participatory Improvement security shall be released upon payment by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost or estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements. 4) If City receives no notice of recorded claims of lien, labor and materials security shall be released in full 90 days after final acceptance and/or approval by the City Council, of the Improvements. If City receives notice of any recorded lien, the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act shall apply. 5) Warranty security not utilized during the warranty period shall be released one year after final acceptance or approval by the City Council of all Tract Improvements. However, if at the end of the one-year warranty period, there are one or more outstanding requests by City for performance of work or provision of materials under the terms of the warranty, warranty security shall be retained until the outstanding requests are satisfied or until Subdivider has made other arrangements satisfactory to the City Engineer. 4. Permits Required. Prior to commencing any phase of work, Subdivider shall obtain all permits required for that phase of work and pay all required fees. Work performed under a permit or permits shall comply with all provisions of the required permits. 5. Off -site Improvements. When the construction of one or more of the Improvements requires or necessitates the acquisition of real property not owned by Subdivider or City, Subdivider shall use its best efforts purchase such real property at a reasonable price. In the event that Subdivider is unsuccessful, despite its best efforts, to acquire such real property at a reasonable price, Subdivider may request in writing that City attempt to acquire such real property. City may, but is not required to, agree to attempt to acquire such real property on behalf of Subdivider. If City so agrees, City and Subdivider shall enter a separate written agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Said separate agreement shall provide that Subdivider advance to City One Hundred Fifty Percent (150%) of the appraised fair market value of the real property. Any unexpended portion of said advance shall be refunded to Subdivider. Any additional funds required for acquisition of the real property shall be paid by Subdivider to City upon the conveyance of said real property to Subdivider. In no event shall the failure of Subdivider or City to acquire such real property excuse, waive, or otherwise terminate Subdivider's obligation to construct the applicable improvement pursuant to this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval. 11.J U11 T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEV\TRACTS\29894-2\S I Agreement.wpd Page 3 of 6 6. Completion of Improvements. Subdivider shall begin construction of the Improvements within ninety (90) days and shall complete construction within twelve (12) months after the approval of this Agreement. Portions of the Improvements may be completed at a later date, as determined by the City Engineer or as set forth in Exhibit A. Failure by Subdivider to begin or complete construction of the Improvements within the specified time periods shall constitute cause for City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare Subdivider in default of this agreement, to revise improvement security requirements as necessary to ensure completion of the improvements, and/or to require modifications in the standards or sequencing of the Improvements in response to changes in standards or conditions affecting or affected by the Improvements. Said failure shall not otherwise affect the validity of this agreement or Subdivider's obligations hereunder. 7. Force Maieure. In the event that Subdivider is unable to perform within the time limits herein due to strikes, act of God, or other events beyond Subdivider's control, the time limits for obligations affected by such events will be extended by the period of such events. 8. Time Extension. Subdivider may make application in writing to the City Council for an extension of time for completion of the Improvements. The City Council, in its sole and absolute discretion, may approve or deny the request or conditionally approve the extension with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. As a condition of the time extension, Subdivider shall furnish securities, similar in form and substance to those required in SECTION 3 hereinabove, to cover the period of extension. The value of the securities shall be sufficient to ensure the performance of and payment for Improvements that remain incomplete at the time of the extension, and to provide warranty security on completed Improvements. 9. Survey Monuments. Before final approval of street improvements, Subdivider shall place survey monuments in accordance with the provisions of Sections 66495, at sec. of the Subdivision Map Act and of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Subdivider shall provide the City Engineer written proof that the monuments have been set, evidence of payment and receipt thereof by the engineer or surveyor setting the monuments, and intersection monument tie -outs for monuments set in public streets. 10. Final Acceptance of Improvements. At the completion of construction and prior to acceptance of the Improvements by City, Subdivider shall submit a request for final approval by City. The request shall be accompanied by any required certifications from Subdivider's engineers or surveyors, approval letters from other agencies having jurisdiction over and approval authority for improvements required by this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval, and any required construction quality documentation not previously submitted. Upon receipt of said request, the City Engineer or a duly -authorized representative will review the required documentation and will inspect the Improvements. If the Improvements are determined to be in accordance with applicable City standards and specifications, and as provided herein, obligations required by the Conditions of Approval and this Agreement have been satisfied, and Subdivider has provided revised plans as required in Paragraph 11, hereinafter, the City Engineer shall recommend acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council. 11. Revisions to Plans. When the Improvements have been inspected and approved by the City Engineer, Subdivider shall make any necessary revisions to the original plans held by City so the plans depict the actual Improvements constructed. When necessary revisions have been made, each separate sheet of the plans shall be clearly marked with the words "As -Built," "As -Constructed," or "Record Drawing," the marking shall be stamped by an engineer or surveyor, as appropriate for the improvements thereon, who is licensed to practice in California, and the plans shall be resubmitted to the City Engineer. 12, Improvement Warranty. Subdivider hereby guarantees the Improvements to City for a period of one (1) year, beginning on the date of final acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council, against any defective work or labor done, or defective materials furnished, and shall repair or replace such defective work or materials. 13. Release of Security. City shall retain and release securities in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of this agreement. Prior to the release of payment security, the City Engineer may require Subdivider to provide a title report or other evidence sufficient to show claims of lien, if any, that may affect the amount of payment security released. 119 14. City Right to Cure. If Subdivider fails to perform any obligation hereunder and such obligation has not been performed within sixty (60) days after written notice of default from City, then City may perform the obligation, 012 T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEV\TRACTS\29894-2\S I Agreement.wpd Page 4 of 6 and Subdivider shall pay the entire cost of such performance by City including costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing such obligation. In cases of emergency or compelling public interest, as determined by the City Engineer, the requirement for written notice of default and/or the passage of sixty (60) days shall be deemed waived and all other provisions of this Article shall remain in effect. 15. Indemnification. Subdivider hereby binds itself, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, executors, administrators, guarantors, heirs, and assigns, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold City and its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and assigns harmless from and against any losses, claims, demands, actions, or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, arising out of or in any way connected with Subdivider's performance herein under, including costs of suit and reasonable attorneys' fees. 16. No Modification of Conditions. This Agreement shall in no respect act to modify or amend any provision of the Conditions of Approval. In the event that any requirement or condition of this Agreement is inconsistent with or fails to include one or more provisions of the Conditions of Approval, which document(s) is (are) incorporated herein by reference, the provisions in the Conditions of Approval shall remain in effect and shall control. 17. Severability. In the event that any provision or provisions of this Agreement are held unenforceable, all provisions not so held shall remain in full force and effect. 18. General Provisions A. All notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the parties at their respective addresses indicated hereon. Notices personally delivered shall be effective upon delivery. Notices mailed as provided herein and sent postage prepaid shall be effective upon the date of delivery or refusal indicated on the return receipt. Either party may change its address for notices hereunder by notice to the other given in the manner provided in this subparagraph. B. The terms, conditions, covenants, and agreements set forth herein shall apply to and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors of the parties hereto. C. Neither party to this Agreement relies upon any warranty or representation not contained in this Agreement. D. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted with respect to the laws of the State of California. E. In the event of any dispute between the parties with respect to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to prompt payment of its reasonable attorneys' fees from the non -prevailing party. F. Any failure or delay by either party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any such rights or remedies provided for hereunder. 117 T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEY\TRACTS\29894.2\S I Agreement.wpd C,' 13 Page 5 of 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. CITY: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager ATTEST: SUBDIVIDER: By: Title: By: Title: Reviewed and Approved: City Engineer Approved as to Form: City Attorney Date Date City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 760/777-7075 NRI - CCP I, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company 81-100 Avenue 53 P. O. Box 980 La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 398 - 0699 Date 118 T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEY\TRACTS\29894-2\S I Agreement.wpd 014 Page 6 of 6 Exhibit A SECURITY - TRACT 29894-2 Except as otherwise provided herein, Subdivider shall furnish performance security and labor & materials security prior to agendization of the Map for approval by the City Council. Improvements designated as "Participatory" have been or will be constructed by others. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place indefinitely until called upon or released by City. Monumentation security shall guarantee performance of or payment for the work and shall be utilized or released as specified in Chapter 4, Article 9 of the Subdivision Map Act. The "Engineering & Plans" security will be released when the City has possession of complete, approved, original plans, signed and sealed by a design professional(s), for all required improvements. The "No -Plan Contingency", which may be utilized for any listed item or for other cost found necessary in the design or construction of the required improvements, may be released in whole or part by the City Engineer, at any time after construction plans are complete and the scope and nature of improvements are fully known. These releases shall be separate from and in addition to the reductions discussed below. As elements of the work are completed, Subdivider may request a maximum of two partial releases of performance security. Partial releases shall be for not less than ten percent (10%) of the total performance security for the tract and shall not reduce total performance security below the amount necessary to complete the Improvements plus ten percent (10%) of the original amount. Partial releases of performance security will be evaluated and may be granted, in whole or in part, by the City Engineer. Requests for partial releases, setting forth in detail the amount of work completed and the value thereof, shall be made in writing to the City Engineer. Labor & materials security shall remain in place until 90 days after all required tract improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council. Improvement Description Performance Labor & Materials Grading (On -site) 590,000 590,000 Street Improvements (On -site) 2,169,524 2,169,524 Storm Drainage (On -site) 258,800 258,800 Domestic Water (On -site) 1,535,150 1,535,150 Sanitary Sewer (On -site) 930,075 930,075 Dry Utility/Electrical (On -site) 355,834 355,834 Street Improvements (Off -site) 818,105 818,105 Traffic Signals 225,000 0 Offsite Jefferson Street Imp. (Participatory) 155,000 0 Street Dry Utilities (Off -site) 543,616 543,616 Domestic Water (Off -site) 986,300 986,300 Perimeter Wall (Off -site) 802,200 802,200 Perimeter Landscape (Off -site) 323,856 323,856 Monumentation 50,000 0 Construction Subtotal: $9,743,460 $9,313,460 Engineering & Plans (20% of Construction) 1,948,692 No -Plans Contingency (25% of Project) 2,923,038 Total: $14,615,190 r1 11" SHEET T Of JO $HEM IN THE CITY OF LA DUIMA. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT N 0. 2 9 8 9 4- 2 CORDER'S CERTOLTE ram ra _ oN P as1. YNeJ.II._PIWI. AT_ p A ARe®I P A rVAItM P QIWM a MY M NNIII NYI P MMM 1% mI1P! • Ai IV(O = �. AT M NylE81 NNIN I i M.. MM YWMD IF14W MVAtlN m M OrrIP1 MT T{1Bi. tl1Y GYN P M TY P WNSTA PARDUE, CORNWELL A ASSOCIATES. INC. FEBRUARY, 2001 Na 6M' L m0 tgMIY A4AM - tlDN - N6'M6F11 M IO11N 9MA9CN OWWIIR: Il6M IN1Nel lII1L EN//IN owNy9 STA u NT SURVEYOR'S ST T FNr K xGOY !4{la IIMT TIC MF M ONW P M ISO N611E0f e111x M MIQ.®I � IFIRT! Sd1E 111N � w A II3l® 1/IM WM1OI1 P M aIAR P U' i10101N MO TNT aloAN Ie1mk M ¢ A1S M PKr Pflmis MNL aamrt R 1IFCfIDwY m PA! A ra IPP Cfll®11N P TRNn M 0n� M61a CNe¢nr IOa1MYN A MMSY 1NLC 11FEII 1Mr Na 11ax11SNN aIRRx NDGV aATKYY em alrb rnlL m fm IAIN1 rwT A: CaamR m M NaMN wD I[mm11a P ra NT nPOBaw N11NB rONa'M! P IOACM YY b lfeN MIIM M DBBNTM INIQ IK P MIW IMIYT[ McIOMDIIi�WNFrQ11M OWIf R MIIQa/ PFNII m PdNiC m M QIY Y IA YW1A NM IIIMC b11FaT NO eNTY M MIIIMY m FC 16A/RD. M a111MY N TIIIC MO NNICIF b MMCIL RIINxF1 MOMS N. MtMIF 01. NO WLMW Mdl[ b 9MN1 d T[I IW. dM, EO1 .qNp E /MIPVI iL. LS Tx nBaKa 1a-n-m BAN° so Na-cP a ut A oD.YenE unl0 lYHlm aalRnN �,a am. w as Isrm want mrAxr, s � Im xnNx1RF NrmrbalalR. ��� +* ^�\@ m 1wuulR rump Fn 1',co '.11 it A 11M NICIOII N4 CQ PBNM Mml \ \ f�?/ STATEMENT TRUSTEE CM SURVEYOR'S 1N rt misam�irlo°-300° I NOQr Mua Mi I was evren M wnM1 uv P ma Na aw1-a mNmw P b Ism m'�oo-m ro wo i000-ssnm. s°®Em11 m ram rn[ W7 Mcw AaN I w samm ra nN 1VP a 1m11wAr mwm.Y. msNBRFALm Iwo nlla aaMwT 1AlIFIQ Smell om P nun NTbNm a-1s-Tm1 b rsnelRNr xM aaol-lase & aNKw smIOY. GTR mot MJACWfMIfMM�rPPL6 m tMN BrA uENT I MGOi SaNC TNr I IMC RMRtD M'mIM SILOD YM p 1MF TEA' >W-1 LVINMaIa P IYdIY !M FllOii TW M MtOe>9a11 MMM IWM M MIYOSIIYLY M 4M[ w CM M TMAII.f NM Mn YN MRaTID K1CNIgM4 TNSVi. TVT ML RU9A16 P M 911EaM1aN WP IC! /IM MH IL(K MWNap MNR:ML S M M P MIIa.Y1 P M 11111A1M MN wAS !m1 aVld e11N. WFa: 442apaal A-]a-a1 Pn OSCSNt Cllr P M WMACP. NOTAeY A^MNDVB!DDYFMT PPS u CITY [ RK'S STATL. NT aaJl. CFFd1E IIF. a AN[ s MYY. NM1 alAt MM Gynay QNN P M tl1Y Wx1 P M a1N P u CNRA f%UMRM MWIY FNIC MT S'O CITY fgK'L Ai A 1@AM 161Na 1lIO W M roawwlr NMr ro m/YOKNSMmpglNMropNK1a(M� 1YL Y 1�MNq/I1�1T1p�q /LY�FlfD pl P M P uW1YA M G a /ap as iMrF18yV�1TIMa� ON wdS x NN wIBMI MwS b MNNI ax ra ws. WON mum 6 q pl YlYelile E�FlMw(4Jn / Lax�MMMM eIIXCss wIIMN W MIILV/L HALF P BI9ta yp 6 M CNllr. yIFR 9aa1 W NICIYOI !WO .111E 4 �e G �aF UNSMN Cllr NUIR P M mae P eNRasx ; Fy CMMIY P amt sTaIK Nc rorpI�O1IMfINNIE/m MF misN®m M MANFNT TAX W MDR's GMFILTE M 8YE M IP 1Y1 wI1NI0im 1iennsweu�a Mx)NIDI� m IS 11YT 1 PIIMIm uI M� s) 1 IEmr cmMv nNr rLmlo m M RsaoF or rle; amz b P Tlb m[ Mx �NN� � INI�.IIO M �� MS MJ It7M bWI M PIWIPIY 9N1M M M NIIIx IIID SM UWIL b1A1L GIXMY O � A9fa•E116 PIIFCI[a b TAVR InSMMm. NF Y111NC1! W N11n FfIWRa m CE 1 M1FR AOI. N1L IISGM'•1L Ca1111Tr Tb OTILC'IM MY W WOpMI DNE M afP111Y MO TAX BOND CEMF)CATE 11lIIR! fPRT T1n A m0 N M aW P a _ TNT NN ram MM M BaMN P MNBf,BIPB P 1R 1�R1! C� MBO�E �� tgPlnd IIIOM M MYISM P /IL TAKA 6N1E WIMIr. IMICM In.JL MO ,yy MOYL Allmpla CpLL6Tm w �Npy NNM AT M M NW P ra PM M'1Sf NO PIIORMIY M 11aT Y[T MYInC IMP NM M Ca1111Y rtialNNl MF A I!!1 wo vs TI01O IMB eIDl NAr 1YrRam n OIa f1BNN P nM00QQNa SN3lAi11RE�OtlS Mlaa: 90a1. NCMINII! m aFL'110M aali0 P M Mb.OW]M IRI PLT M MNNT11Ff P M MN Tb N ra110ON ANW P MnIOBE MOMI aI1ER MIMBI9 14n£ ®1 PniFa: aONIY A YAILISY MIIL YWNML mN P M wm P nsumsPs aaulnr *NI mMmla" M n IOVN Oar 1 O 89e m' RR. A./ aEc PER P R) Pn. xmNiw R.S. 67/76 Po NOONINO 'IF N. I• LP., xo rIG. BRwss Nvp s iw. pN..0 xo NEr NO REF Ru i— -'1 �Sfi 5 y JFFFEFiSON S7RCL•� . NOTIS']fiW 536]Ati IyWpTp1'[ I]22.11' h ..+, V 26R2.59' 1102.1I' ,p r fl-ST]AA' rnw G= i�'� ffi _� OB tl tl n n tl tl B 0 9 tl8 p5�� 4u4� h N a Ix6]ASA' PLS " xpypT3oW 2s2e.32 'Z� tltl mtl ptltl nn tl tlAi _ Y- m� b � n m v tl tl tl tl Y tl tl tl tl r v v S q{^m m 3( r _ Y xpvop'Ip'E 25]].13' (263.3.12) z " __------------ ___-------- �'S E T ]> lottl tl xpvpl'pNW zsxw9' ipR oP. Ii r B $m 9� W F l7 S y i rU m8 G 1 F B 4 me c ' � • B C J Cil E= I N� Z �b M �0� FIRE pN� ---- " '11 ' r m � W [y} 1 R O ffi r r e i O m' 9 B B b UEMDU NiA .i �j .SON xpvM'a0'E xs3t.55�, , -1 y v !_ , � P MVMIP EpN S f ---- ..�------ cm of wplo .€1a[Er %= WE r .... -- - c _ k. L rZo � � ouN.. o '.J P4i2 Ifz 0. v cj _ _ _ __ u v " Cm OF LAOUINIA } v m m P 4 T r - r v m 7 WVOB'.1" 213212 �+� COUNTY OF RNERSIUE �� V •'1 4J � O cp V� �_ b �\ ) NOVI 13TE zWt.28' [2W7.401 (2WT4O') bi NW 12'OJ1 202.60' (202.16') «26J352'11 ma _ ail m a? � �9r aSR D P A H� IS 's 4� ue F✓ _ m Y CU th / CI1Y OF U OUINiA E 1/< Cpa. sEC. Ip. kE C a / N. 2' NW.0 N20', µ V1 CJ MR 3/4 IP. W, 1.5' PER R.S. 9A/a u V x00'20']A'E 2i3].55' 4 N]Y21'ICE 22582 (2IR592' PER P,MR. 110/29-29) y_ N I26f5.Rx') 121 IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 3 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 POtl 0.IIW.QN 61 KPICN D' Gf1O1 a MO TE s011l, MYf R GLIp 1a 10NBf B StlIBL WiE 1 GR. aNr amww rnaa rccalac ro rrR Breaa Bur nnRBB. PARDUE, CORNWELL k ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 3001 PARCEL MAP ND, 1 f516 P.MII 133/6 5 (NBalr rm saa rW)'�� LINE TABLE CURVE TABLE M. �„BRI BF/aBB aA mar �aBB 10.W LID ABJ MN Irl .I}I LT 0.W MYl ur w xQ mro `ss°ei oe W Ix e'Jis W ms, zroBm aoyt `fi\B.j° N 80 W h S.0.1 J\ \ n O/ e 78 SS�vmtt �� p\ S>m 0.1J my \ O /S \ SBm v. R9s /tS O.IJ aev� 74 17.3m\ 6� A l�Q rt�`cp� 2 , \ '1 ANgM1e Ir 4 w,�� 70 BD yp ; )M1� ;qo.\ as I0.J mvl � P P . � D 0 BB W BBJ M1 1�` S e0. ,� fififi/ „�M1eM1 A \] my T.f riM1 hofi 0' M1 o ''r D Ou emvn. 'X b+L+3*1_aJwBp r u6e \I]aw.� -' r� a B4 JJ LOT J f 0,, mer NOTE: RI RI¢r z mB awx\us xrn] Mo wMsaM xol¢ 22 IN THE CITY OF LA DUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET { OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 WA 1 AIBP®r a 0. roM GIR�Y Maly a StlrlrL 0.Y9F ] F/51. drBtlW � M�Ml4 /4M'LxM1�G 10 PARDUE, CORNWELL k ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 2001 1 52ND AVENUE un stir .166 00 LOT B W 1Rl'«........ er:.rr = LOT A yy' .. s�.rn 4 n g ve `°�4% p. ramez•— n ,B3 0.) N y 50 e B SJ �, nl n xecwJe�lr .IIY.00 B h n 0.r Bp�)1'I � �V� , xm«'Irz swm' W I e a 'b qp 'r � W rtl4 /Y ,t n M PBJJ.501)YOB.IB YlA .r0..l�IM �,I I V • } x_}°e.0�(OTN et S"�3, H ni IB.00 n���ls,' QED pe\e\Be W -0T'oe le' a?aa 'rrr! , -AwE '7 7 p" �° CURVE TABLE LINE TABLE !� 82 q r}rn�ir Prsw mu ur rasm aww' �' l:SITPT wK r� m _x H3 : B4 � ^I�� �r nee ]ram Jl.w Tm W _ `\�I 4 R ie'B q rt. S]tl4 R. xB),0'e]'WT MN,O'JM1_(FL pp 61.]] Mm a)J W Y4Ro n V1 uer I t v C) li 19 J7 r i] I — Y~ "" " / e LOT ] p17 "e I t?i :I Ix Ilci �� xer_w_'w:4L- 'ec SEE SHEET 17 NOTE. a au, ] mP mnerme xom, !ro rwlon r«les 123 IN THE CITY OF LA DUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 5 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 va x noa a A ronex s acmr B Ro >K s0um xv s s¢nox ,a ,pN®F a swl,l, r.NNE T Ms, srR ewwmxo Memwl. JcrameN ro nE aline Bur nAraaB. PARDUE. CORNWELL h ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 2001 f 52ND AVENUE e F— � LLJ LLJ LLJ W ^6 R = LOT B n'm.B n LOT B iu p•zaee.00 N I.es .ee fn 1•zr.lq xnXAl.Bib r g ygj¢gl_VIA SAVONA raves 4 W b' bb' q� 4b 4mUJ 4m 4 caul bJwOn IMw'.,el xeBw'bl xarYvl xYve'J}l xaew'u'v xbw'ul rrwal — twf i°q e-osl le xMp2;fn a-bwm o-znm 85 B0.0.V4R Be 9nAtl 87 $B.0.N9 88 gA000 89 9nwo BO 9B. W. 91 92 r 93 94 trav'a' BS R OSI q� ii 0.TI r - R 6 esyXl - q.R R 0.TI evs rO�fl R °.T xrv� 6I 0.31 evee B. MVMR�Rppp°4rtA@0.P]O R 0.11 mn I R q. X.NB 6I 6TI mr B.IPe �R X.N y 41u q. R.9 'dl mw _ _ 9 °.Pr ew 0.TI em 6T aaq 9J of eam — eem' vum "r:ii:<00 ue ew srrz e.oir�r Tr sxe L0-r J p.Y00.00 1.ue u 0av op ie' N>v for y J J 1 137 136 ?r �� 1,3 l.M InSM42 K� 1 Vv trbrYY IJI A! e^� . a 135 za1,3q n. y"£ P. a.., 134 _ 133 4' ww I3? raa .4e..X y Iv c I� £ VIA 1\j0 IS611' \N� ly,'N'A iusb'af Trelvn'Me) LOT K Ili r I� ".zeo.°o !i L+� £ e:irii�oo' W pa,o�o x.mo.°° \g', s 139 "•Jo.oO e� lar" ie re• a`=ii of"°>• `h, `3 It" = "ve°.S°1•Irs ss r- V) nz«ems (C" RI N>i"�. rse aanu Je' o-�mroe' r f- w W 14D A w 141 w e`•zr it rl' Ig ea...' 1o42 }p �/ au .e.. / 142 a S.raa ¢{E3 R 143 144 17.1 o- R � 4 i '00 Flo 4 N)IWyy °•I]'isir a it oelle :.J J NOTE zap BJw1mp's rlol,s »o BaBplm lolc,, LINE TABLE Nx Nxam BFMM' ly ]I LI um) lH IAW CUR>VE "TABLE enN rsw'm wra mu rb p}S Ztl (O W ISIJ 124 IN THE CITY OF LA DUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 6 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 euc N 91itt.B[x w N BamuNvwmvoR"rzmwi urw�i m e wvin R"c[ x usz. rlMJfY�E m�ilc rviiz PARDUE, CORNWELL R ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 2001 —z—q 52ND AVENUE LOT nwyn VIA SAVONA ea I<Bpyt um e m mm Ba w NMw'!K IYsw'vt nMTb'vT xwmYBT Nwm3Bt wBw3zt xmw'vt nemY°T Now'SBF i1Nww»t _ W W W = W V) = VI 97 98 100 101 102 103 100 �11106 107 ',� v^- ILL, 98 a amB ne mBB _ s.°oo rv. xjS a"04 x.y zr . .... e..e oror �.^a on '°ag Bazi ;o.:� Aomn"a Iaom�a Aoaa .a x.G lo.zl e....8LLJ .B. n5 I iaa .e.. La W Nvozr ee zl 4 V) I°ftl Mm' fatly Mm' B°mNw' , Wm' e6W NLO' 2 nm OT 1 CURVE TABLE 0.MW lomrx xeaus mrB w mw mu mam LINE TABLE ur »u mnm m un zmm uA uwrx rdWBe L9 0.z] IlX :J a leeyiut�rs za.00' di Nerii ie!- I.I ^w➢LbY IS e`ez • e z d.r er r J0•Alr _ 133 8 132 r S 129 Ive �8 131 r4� _Y arz ore .e.. m.." lau3128 ``,y IM ",D. mu a1 R.3.0.00 ; r :a.oero d z-+oniixs n r svai.-rrers"r _ r ep.zlf.f° ev-•ex` .x� W x.re.•r lP z CD Lv r Is.eo m e-zo'u z� � _ � LOT K "-�ror � s.ww �v ".rn.00 n xr.a.B�rw'.ry r°a•JB+B^.^: °zriir``' °r•' uj V) `ii s.xq.��.,' rr.m xem'•zs' srse'r 'ryu. d•}0 wzeCfr•Ir — �— I'ORf0F1N0 W W1 esm _ __vu , a'� N1 £ a w. u'TIS'yj W = VI N145 I:C rvy°o ILOL • 144 ^•�r°q°° r .rondos 'k' g =•0^ 11.411 •au e'e.." n 4+9 148 r d-rB'-isro y, ri W V) 147 x. 4` aen a 148 e-•sl.00 •ti rrRuW rams Yn q[R 149 e.iv oB ry nxn' g rmw Ira.,• J NOTE sl¢r z mR wwaw's lom xo xolxeulr.orzs 125 IN THE CITY OF LA DUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 29894-2 ma x wvnm a x nma m max • Nro tt mum uNr a max +a raves v wum. waT v vsr, wl amwo ramvx. vcmww m rE mRua eve over. PARDUE, CORNWELL k ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH. 20DI -`�q 52ND AVENUE xeam'wr rmv.er °L`r+'a ra� VIA SAVONA xyayso L.rm s oev.er r °Ts, a.So� SHEET ] OF 30 SHEETS beam w mm ° xxu , x-e.o vow \ Ntlm'faT mw IL#mSIF mm IMm39T as xum'%T m9m'fxT NNmYat Naxl9ixT 1 0 dy']0'S0' lbI�1D \ \\\ w a.r'rvvr LLJ LLJ 112 _ 109 110 111 ease re rc.- rc. 115 \ W tls N 0.1Mtl M;.B _ I9..� H.N 9.MJw..g B°WJ.V.:.g IB. WV MnrLB 'B.M p�M1k I0. e e yA> IO]Im �OB]6�N 116 ��"s r ,e. rr ,e. rr, t LLJ W er�i"iiv°e. .....13 N Lvxv L J_r CURxVE m.K xTABLE NMm LH � awm ux xmm NOTE: m vm x my awramNs role xo ,oanar xom. 126 IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET B OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 eu< a smeu z x wRlol a sanox v xo me scum NYf rc samx ra mesas s mnx, wxa � cWi, srN mwuo vRaW° rmmxc m na sRna nm mvca. PARDUE. CORNWELL l ASSOCIATES. INC. MARCH. 2001 TRACT NO. 6662 Ln s PARC L %./IAP Z O LD O s (n 0 m. NSL . mv. m xsa oua Mf R.a uAa U � U 52ND AVE.NUF. (a«er Pa P.Ma lw}n z,—q xw«'xxt aua (asz.u9 lux.w'(I.w.w) sns' y� �S Lu B re W e 3 _ , O—r r\. �e,: D ,� o L.L.IE o LLJ Z y�s4Y1\ G '�Y91r 1 e. ♦iJ:}ViJav o Jj� �� JroJ�iel _ 'J� mom � (4•' I ' i 117 \ xE_YyYitLR19SC y\ xmsratPl LD' I 0, xrv%" `LI I xesx'x_x s I JT CURVE xenlxit „a., MJL)XTC x81'N'«t I __ L=m ra«e m m oa m« 9e 1e '6e a LL P1r.�l :q7 F SEE SHEET 9 SEE SHEET 10 NOTE; ..�D.. me aAW �t ..R.... TABLE IFMEM RKIYS M1iA W Il.el }IIW 127 0 � m-v W W 2 e'er — - N w w Tn IN THE CITY OF LA DUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 9 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 eeee: n aemsnx a n PailoR a acleW a Na eIR muM xwr of nrinR e4 mw®s a � wx¢ T Mn, xw eDeevmelo MRW4 ActJ>eAM: m � orroa na muu. PARDUE, CORNWELL R ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 200e SEE SHEET 8 o ""'u o w w Tn w w (n LINE TABLE lel[ M 4ARIIL CURVE TABLE 4PK IEIiLM Flplb L6lA n> am ixiao � xn aw w nes xim � .y. NOT sa Rm a mR aRmms xom xo wxuxxr wrzz 128 IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 10 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 euN ° wvad 6 ♦ wnumww IEI�1M m�ilR �rLii>s a svulR wrs v vs, PARDUE, CORNWELL h ASSOCIATES. INC. MARCH, 2001 SEE SHEET 4 I I E6vxeRmtr 1O!'IAD' 1 'a � J I I s'°svv quarynj I \ I \\ � •ev I W 1 W- e4 \ W sasn .a rc. cL \ 1 L' Ny_ 1u pT„ I SEE SHEET 11 NorE: SR 9REI 1 RN WfiL1M91O16 MO KMYFNf ROR3 129 IN THE CITY OF LA QUlNTA. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 11 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 axc A Pul PARDUE. CORNWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 2DOI SEE SHEET 10 i it it it it rn > IJ 0In Ij z > < m z it c m it SEE SHEET 12 NOTE 130 IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 12 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 PARDUE, CORNWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 2D01 SEE SHEET 11 OL tz� t III ra 2 0 z > < m z c: m SEE SHEET 13 NOTE, 131 IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 13 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 PARDUE, CORNWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 2001 SEE SHEET 12 I SIT w (A z > m m 5 SEE SHEET 14 NOTE 132 IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 14 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 . A SBI.®1 R 1 Ig1Y1 S 4CIM1 a MO IIE OJIII Wlf R 4tM1M ,4 tYelpf a Y MYL I.. sr mwwo ,nmwl, lcmww m tt aen¢ H.1T noRrc. PARDUE, CORNWELL k ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 2001 AVENUE 54 wemsrc een.ee> (mee.Pr rFn a.e.R nOseel --�/I\ un n�naio.ma - 1' IP s ms xr"Al5TA'. PARCEL MAP JNC, 1-1033 P.>\ B, 15//93-94 M H W W 2 to W W N NOTE: � 9eFI i fG RRARR51916 MD YCNAQT NJIQ 133 IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 15 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 oc n mmxxx s A. or mn a xa 11[ wvm rwr a a'llorr la mwme a Yllm{ wrc 1.. wl Mmwoo rwvx. Krmxc m vc urea w no®r. PARDUE. CORNWELL k ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 2001 CURVE TAJLE mxr rarm uau nr xsr rxim ns mm ssm Ld Ld W N M1" Ld Ld N NOTE :m RRW0.IW�RPro.� 134 IN THE CITY OF LA DUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 16 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 ®{ A.. p Ig1YlE1Ww M Ofq�'L N.t� a XN'l RYII 1 VSI. OCA.IflRM'.l to RAROUE. CORNWELL k ASSOCIATES. INC. MARCH. 2001 e-,+o.00 Ir wao'mr zw'��cv�i:�ei4. 00 Hrii •"ii'sl "ie°i)e'oe• v�•M' e.reo zz n;E JT 1 � ap:�4yi 4 54 55 55 57 59 AM.R n{S m. n{S m.{ M A- .) A. q Mt 1 I I an we an ave b azl m� d ail 52 an eR.. A. sw MA Pyl ee p° vasn51n •a\ y R G p _ Y pses.w eiPii4. 50 To aml - M p•he:il'") IJJ an R R; Ld 49 0° ° £ En �RM'i A. ammeeR pip°4`M1p LOT Y �'� art°i W °o.) z.w .e_ ,.; LD 17 (n A. ".R.iF° GJ'" +U a a m q R. °• r �� sv hedi hzh"e? pi 20 5 \ azr pt% p4M1D s.1M1`" pS°p 1.7sa M as w 22 S dam Y / M. p9 .21 0.m� 90 °° x•) 1 'p ez 9' / 1 n it si phd)jB ° �� C•) 24 A..211 159 0°'eRi J M. `D� p`hi spi 1 v`o�R ° r LAJ 28 D r um A..rt En 9)a�`17 27 LLJ LLLJ N p•`✓:9 CURVE TABLE °va Mxvnr a"sry rx zrn axw `p, v� n,n znw �+ Iz rim 115 135 IN THE CITY OF LA DUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 17 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 Bfl,c ° 61NOXml n ° Bovllox rc SFnul a Iro 11[ tluM wu rc ssnn r0.loxlmF \ SdIM, MNLE 1 Gn, 5111 Pw91b IpLMI{ K59pL m TE fi{n4 A°i T()Ea. PARDUE, CORNWELL h ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 3001 SEE SHEET 4 0 wlDgWt@L c)T i'i %mo t/ a\y1 y\ r\YM1 IF -EG ON 82 R. M1J'1 �✓ A]I ov'm Y Ll- I''�jj,earsoo LR- ° dfi.lp i piO59`Se� 61z1 nm... 'bf 000 B A WJy e a.res �X�y'b. �3 Pdpi l.r1T �qfi A 58 57 _ 58 LOTS M ° y0i qf1 a Y x�l�ll. r1 `ah to Ri G s),•ao r{1$ p.,a s° `'P �II_AA�_A1KX •'\••t xllfs'-'6�' 14 g _� XuforJ'TIxXwx ; LLJ 15 X5 \aMsr°°r.°e vr<C'-S 5 _wro'u W Wo.,-''JX1_\•', 17 10 - an . B yam' y-°; LOT O � x� a zxi„ran J r r } CURVE TABLE 9±�a; x ` \•1 / 11 i° P P`o \� A yM1°POY. I t��G, A Pr.M1; 05 I l .fb`4 H �lj,,°, fix, tAN N Po wn.m F \y1,/ P•y5M1?5� JnT" `lrenn.tiLpt ab.'on. J p.M1 LOT D /• 'DT's+�" +�°ter ^'i %u.ie 11�x65 <qq iy 1605511' J \ LID L 6PCrp NZ /m . M � � �yxt rore5 w n p5 � W xor n. Oo W � °po!i5)° reoSBJ °P m 1� 4 W LLJ N o��e \.).,� JJ7 5 „o ,n NOTE: 5¢ sm t WX aRlPwxn lolcv xro xoxi\Ivlr xol¢ B OP1[ IpBM PMUS L6I1 t?] It51 SI0.W JJ.N ILOW C)r IIM J0.DJ IIB CH Itl 516W Y}' LINE TABLE LINE TABLE LVL IrNBM LNMY IG IAA U r1b XT 10' I lti 6b lW ISr ji.d A51 LA IIb 136 IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 18 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 mN A 91v.®II m N mroime ier�ramrw r aax�c m�ir[ any tio. a mnK wxx T usr. PARDUE. CORNWELL k ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 2001 C) W G P'19�0't rr / W Y ipa X „ LAJ LLJ e -aea do •'Nya ° o "e'r e' F^' e.is °sps� �J[ 'LOT D �„sq SR1r) Y. � Y.ry1Yi SH wn rrJ 0 d j NN a era �Y ^Ilk � 39 `/� .yam &. W ".j- P=3�.a1 \mil AC'b}p ! lvl tr9mW. a 104. P ie ¢� , p�c o-as.au ��e canes I £ �r o,oq ada '>.on o-ree.ls n•` F'� o-um'v' ST mi5 e`.re'se'oo k xenzaivER 9i•riiN o.z9 a^.. 3.kc o-svYSY 208 irams'S 1 CURVE TABLE 207 209 .01 oa 0. a sa { ,y, R•r101 J ylRl �I �T 208 ter` `'d� `eb aaa a�.�o«�• NR raa9es w n. 1:0 a SF '4. W LL� 212 N W 213 W F re..,zw n. N M. Im�y2 µ61�e NT r M 214 L.I 84 ra.SR. L� tt� LLI SEE SHEET 27 NOTE: sT vr¢r v rvR R.mTmRs rnrzs xo NwMxr xm¢ 6WK IfNETI RIp4S IXIG M OJE AM rav 137 137 IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 19 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 eFNE A LHI.YiI R A M�UIR '4 IA . e ll J 0.WCE 1 6KJ. IEImWL NY�'r'XC m PARDUE, CORNWELL k ASSOCIATES. INC. MARCH, 2001 SEE SHEET 31 LINE TABLE Lrs ILxem FEA9AL i h u] r4u CURVE TABLE I[Mpm FIpLY ®K WM D-r 19B \�1 DI o0 5� IRau e'.:' A.J R�500�°° iYiIM YiV31'M �T40O20202 Tt:l 1°'zR s�qsz.?ro 5& LI m.rtn, sl °re 0)waLOTT aeaNY A].01 Ili i° �j'Y m d"0�'IJ1p• R'.1ti1V 61-aY "jtl t4 eA '' eX 00 P e w'iJ Jo' eirjjm -I 1_ _ _ VM RESBARO A _ W ••Ja J7 I o °° d-:oiiJ 'o. 47 pn y N W LOT E A'®'=`V R•ttso.00 S IP+ r0.l�agmX. -lep.]0 d•R'1)'1°' f.el.IJ d-J'I9'Jp' r 9e JlV RYJp W Vi W' o° p lazJe.so L-Je VIA DONA --'--e`.-`lrJ�\ oo £)i. .a0 LOIN W 2 W o+: ye % °`.�,i Rntrv.o° `� Jeizejmeew.n (n W N �,0+1° R•zzla so ��h, yo e4+ A� L-0e eP .zzl e.oa i-m s.eJ -zp.n e.4'ol rs dJ'It'r}' -r le. A. f-pb.i e-J'et�• [-Ne R., Ja.°o e-R'ra}� \ _ Po t.i]r011=d-il oR iN RI "Hi ioi.So'y Fq RI W V7 EhhD �A' m241 - E4E o.el �5 I)a9% g2 _ 40 �.4 .n.. D9F 16�J4e° n. °y �e "P'k R.206e. 00 i-r iegss e•r i.i'ditr 3//(q � Iz'z:' efw''zr'Jr � z'y / 298tozil d-N Po etCJWRI ii 1i NM1 `�.`'—r F SEE SHEET 27 NOTE: g�i��ia�lln� 138 IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 20 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 H1L A 9RaQN 6 A KMpI V 9ECRN Y MO M SWIM WIS R BCICM 14 SxMfiF a xiNM. AIWE ] f/S. SIX xFAa'ICIO INGN. A4�GN N M Vf/YL M TFRK. PARDUE, CORNWELL k ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 2001 ��JJ FBI/5, 00 F a'i�S.�5.00•' L-JIOI n'S.' I 6 194 195 "'� 193 r031 II. •'[�� A� gNr' 0.M my •b� er 198 \ y p� oo° mee.0 xms3�°try) ;�; SrT yx'sY) �/ Z"b•v1NZ 192 h e.mw'n' .• 197 � 4 191 190 n ILL Iy01p0�ye / Ig A•X]' 1S NhffiW ff� �Jiy LOT T o `4 1 e. 189 8 raie o>e.❑i 4 ✓ram 188 `ysy rnsvr rz�ert HLWAJ Nw,M�.VaI ro A N rezwatw n. •R\ 18 gi ., n iror aBe244 4 � CURVE TABLE 245 \3qp� r ° ;'°° der, ee, , ° J ' - 246 yy r-nx.]e � ;v l e•n-n:�, m- - res,ee e.axv' s e•er¢so i�ruii _ 247 rTa� F— id il '°'a same n n. 41 Nym.xo Lv J r a od m�m i wr..LLJ r tCf -e re4:e• _ 31 270 _ ILd LL'248 M SEE SHEET 26 NOTE, 4L 96] S iM RIRA.AS Mh, NO VANIENr xN6 �A SRW m Sue xixi « } mr n« tteo roe zer rwro 130 130 IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 19 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 Bxw • almem ar B salrmismmrl a xo src ra1M rwr a 561LM +a t°was a sums exa) vsr. rcwle imam ro tt mloa Bw nua. PARDUE. CORNWELL 3 ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 2001 SEE SHEET 31 LINE TABLE< B uJ nu CURVE TABLE m ram rmW . m �:u ru'w r v J f nx x.n Fj- p Bp 5� IeaJm �. n. "'sii P4 s u99e. �' )J 00 P•lpe.00 pJ'i!° 110. ,�� n IAtB�,kr pr']jjl'B 'JbiY Iy1 BJB;x1 d�,10'0E a 200 J3 ww i•amn o-z rl• S 5 raze a'n.. 1 .. 949 201 S ` 204 w 203 R3N 202 d H o°o BB Le eB Iz0.Jro m. It I Y l0,27 wart. i P ¢ lour °weir :N roA m. Pyo'or, a -le al oe" i [°•yi'oe' ;u LOTT 'p PL!95J. �1p1• �a YIIPTR 1.]B [vB R _Ru B.esB.BB pllO.pO d y xvw co vo�ie�. artxT at—m mm L•e?°!py e-e it e`wiQsB. - VIA PESS1 _ N ! MIS BNId(.50 / O w xlaoo r n n .r rm.nzw�n. IB le }I EV W dlvo°'ia'>B . LOTE wew MtlyJxV B-rrso.° i zr oo x"aa. = 1;sm .y n R O L.n1.IR e•ew rB• 7 e-7 e..irroe 8Ju xv)r W N uY P-1zal.so L-Jel.es VIA DONA B.sor.o ,� C£e W a -ram 1az5 LOTH 2 N axis o^ a-1zle.BB ?nr14,17 -r rr.pB re2wo—e. (n +r� Pozu aP # °!j ae el L-ms.n,!) er'olu 1-rr211' xrB.l e.r•Pr Bs>o.oB d1_p?e 'F° e`-l'il Pe hA0 IpSR i MR]YyS �0:°\! E u°e 241 _ 240 �Fq_ noBBe Win. & a: ee4w. 8 aelraw..^ 243 w= IB.51J .p. 015 evw p � 244 C¢ F 0.0rc p' Baa'Qs. P-lev.PB P �1122- B'�oam i d`-i ar5r e`z'iitrr y ��h 239 a.r avw O-r F—FJ F °y�L}J 1lI.A' SEE SHEET 27 NOTE. s¢ Rm x rvP amnas roles wa mxlMlxr mrc1. 140 IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 20 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 euu x slmPml rc e PORroL a scow v ns Tle sum xse a seml Iq T°nees a sum, wrs / PAeT, ePALNIfM ePPnrWL xxY/bR To n< anu PUT nua. PARDUE. CORNWELL e, ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 2001 -IIS.Oa ,A�p,°g e-Jrroae- i 194 L OT sj ¢ 195 193 Izaen m n oa e°o. ,�y_�t • 188 1 i i00. o° -~ xmiw£(pl °-�jLs Fain "I. am 192 n '" a. w- S'\M ozve°..- 1 197 as � Je''xe pe d sa. x190 `�e eT Yag F� 'am owernn 1"R i TT p-I 50.0°i 5f � Ix' L-11.16 Ipie/• LOTT �9 — IeaveiBB n. u,zyz .fin u ee.. x-Ixim �.p A, P n �e nsVY apt q W°nvn ey° -ry il" °.bv' V W aaa yq W xwe, o p•�.0P1 �°IyJ/e y55Mi � N nor n lezem 4 4y 187 'azvPae.n b e. C � CURVE TABLE nae�e �. n. 186 244all p it F 245 °yPoo W°•A'O• a.Js of lies ro •• fS�RO aLOT nlJ a 246 S �JW. zaiir°,:: N°�•: n-uw "xyoo, oat re°.eee-u'mze r� , dj k c• ° ems. x-erern L-1 u.,.a emu✓ 247 ��, i a-reoan H ii� H ui nsi° xzzz ":n e:ee1le" W W J Lp° Rlxrw � N .� 270 i , uj 240 SEE SHEET 26 NOTE z PM Rxmaln xoR.v xa x°sxon xmLs mu lass ssw 61 IflA SRW 6e m reu um zu rxim O11 JLu ]:41_ ]:41_ C) N H W w V) w LL.I fN IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 21 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 .1.. s A0.WIRM a scnox u xo TE Wml WIf a anlul IP mxss ! Rrml PMR 1 vsT. aw M»wwa MIRIWI, �xc 10 >wE am¢r RAT nArtor. PARDUE, CORNWELL k ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 0001 NOTE; 1421 EV H W W N W W N IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 22 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 va aivml a A. W.. r'�`mwlw mirt arwi rw no'm. a vnn wxz vsr. PARDUE, CORNWELL R ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH. 2001 SEE SHEET 25 M CV H W W 2 N W W N NOT m Pm � mn xa.mn robs xo •oxwvn xmv. 143 _ V1 W W V1 30B IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 23 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 .mmiwxa,xm. ml MVI6VMr W,wn .r:caoxo ro x� asua rui tiv¢s. PARDUE, CORNWELL R ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 2001 :J J xt i x +aoJ.Jo xa°v.00 rx -4 x'°� 103 4_ 182 f yJ.J n-n'ml1r• Ra°i.00 aJ.or LaJ..f ea oon 1B4 9j5 14•]r. yH r0i9mn exsJru• 185 _ 9 °nv Jas I4H 1I ov°° 69 188 9# H raa Vn. € M. raina8...Xnr�.9�]0 e°; H A:I rynu8v �g xmi o J W zrs saanC)m e �i J r LOT W _ ma nror• esn,' 1 uox y .w X V) iaornr - wr, am.o e 01 ea p.,Vr?rwl^ M w ea uxs k LOT U � w w W nxrrosx�n rre xA>v'T x s Vl s Ia H. 343 344 LVIZ 3309 ` 310 r 6]0 oaw 14.CJ1 p. n. E 0.JI evn LINE TABLE s: HR" rn uu xer ul LOTii r ii r CURVE TABLE cvrr 1Rzm Rrpvs mrx cm vw rvrw wz wx aeo ':,� cim Jissi nu rass wm lr.en biw ,'�,Yr' rL.w nn ivn 342 LOT I mas p Win. t. 311 14diiJeo�n. 312 azJl°n.. n umzx'x x 314 r a]JJe � xnr F� 315 341 uen a n ur 0.A env 340 339 L¢3nB 337 LOT r rzoae 338 6ae AA1 ror • own..r xsnru'ztx) 318"� = xwJ>JrtAI rz.no .a rc. Sv4 3 e?« ea. u 6N aaw ¢ja 335 ry y IA.0 r0.bl eFvvX. ¢4< XNN_YWRI 112w u � x`-waw SEE SHEET 24 NOTE: vc R.ns.n x rm awx,as lom xo I,om],n,r rcrrs. 141 IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 29894-2 euc x smxm a z wmlul m ¢crol a No M vrm wv a ucnol Iq sauRe a mvu. Wxa } vs. 41x iRWMItl IEImIW. IIXYUIC A M C{ildL M TF1E6. PARDUE, CORNWEEL A ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 2001 SEE SHEET 23 Ixix� oxw.rarnn� e e a'Y e_ A Isam' 318 "M�1 .. Tl7 335 u � J�vRc IFroI w. n. , aJv ms. raspy x}IPy+Mnf nl'A.Y IIYRJ' SHEET 24 OF 30 SHEETS 317 - xmvemY@1 334 mm' xw s_+"Ne) 31B �6 xmvrztPn LSD.x Ld_ 333 rxim' xwmuh>+1 LG� Ixim _ '- ron. •9�.. 332 J ii r ?i xu�lss• L !. - ,�"• � ry o.'ii en.. p45 Imw _ xu91m2(IQ e-mnm u.5 tau w+nr rxim' a✓ 320 rwwwVryi Iz.ne w. R� rmm' I g p rzaio aw... I� R+T, xem'nv 7 I' Imm• J—r r II.WZN n. Imm'm ,w x.,a'xi„ L' y an S5ixwm'm 330 9 I ce A,� qr' RMAfI]l� I� try vex A29 � µ _ ¢Ta B.4 Ib as szz rmlP „mm — ze �... a29 a a 329 'aa9 w rmm - w b' 329 mw g_ry IFI35 w.:. LOT 0 O NR'.P'IIF d 320 3 rmm. al a.zz e.... xnmsrro ez+}n>. i Imm 324 xu'.usz xuv'Jzt a9B} w ry S_v pi. 327 m o. 1 0i a.]9nw ISrE 325 r zaroz� 328 �a� �m Jr r CURVE TABLE a«r IJwm xuels mu nmnmm mm my nn mm wz m.m Irmm Yr • WB 16II ISAm nm rYa Isom nn }su rmm rm' },m rml.m NOTE. .. 2 yq 9.RAlm$ x01FS MO W WYMI x416. 145 IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 25 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 eAi x stV.®I 6 A PoxIGI W 4 a M M NAllll WIfT ][CI[M 1% 7lw9eP a AVIM. RWZ 7 W. sw euwwlo x04MIl mom ro M urxn[ wi M166. PARDUE, CORNWELL & ASSOCIATES. INC. MARCH, 2001 SEE SHEET 21 SEE SHEET 22 x+rmn � y 300 ili � rsone ra n j\ 1 / �l b ovw S2 aay 278 >y�, N»`)1Dy I. )7B�.wrt 1 _ 4i7 299 xo I lavnw 1 ww 'qYq 277 Nnw�+owa P ass aw f7T Nn sve xnn 29B 2 Ixim' raox �x :.a IW'NIeF 278 R� asi '7T 7p, 297 ge> iirii am 7 LOT 278 6 yy xnxb'[ Iw.le' -Py+ r6imi aw _ xMVS'uF G 1Ee le 296 . I]aA' N 'Ae,']ew 10.3]s ry fl. AITm IlI'S1• i 280 s 295 "Y Iosr Ixp'mS YI e�.. 281 = xim' r.'e a exw" 4 xent T re r dd r de el LJ—J r 294 Q Ixi� ra�]�n l d a 2 28 ra.rl w. x Ivm' ss m.. xu7_>s'e 81 293 r�8 CURVE TABLE ��AA 283 ']°o' aax mmw awes Inrm w. re. cm n.)r maw oss °w. xu`1xiT 6 en na s� .mm 292 '9 �c xsg t xel'sJex c xel'No' 284 ozw Ise InaT M., m rc. e.s+rie' 'x,7d xe]sTXY[ 0.]e arse BI 291 e' '71]V Z y, 5is 285 1 ISIY n 1 *U, I p, Xry7Yf]E ass m.. SEE SHEET 28 NOTE: ]Q 9YEi 2 M AMFUS 1016 Ma ICMINd) XOIES 14r IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 26 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 t SAIIIG 0.VI.T 1 FM. H A. a A PINIMX14MY61p M pidL M m 11flER. PARDUE. CORNWELL k ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 2001 SEE SHEET 21 r.:9 n 1 za248 1 $$b Ir.e269 rJ1er Z �, I, wrunrw I_ R 1 � ImaJ. /a q "zr_bw h eA 240 z niil veP..n e �a eqa xelvu�ypi IszyPia 'vmr°1'r�pl 250 287 raw' rJnm' xszl_vTNR) xel+rrrlRy J r 6Ae AaC A'a G`--_ 251 266 IaG.J1 .P I1. r)OS, IE �n _ 6N uwx ItP Ik r IGG 3 IS6W IM% tl xnsvrnx � N61°=J� 265 y �'z =� raiiv.'�.: . s2, r o'.0 —AA s H Isaro rJam' NaSVYIY[ nau'nt ii �' ii r x-r �J 8 264 'I ranee arc. s� 'a..1, n. � oA, .e.. xaeve'J ` vrxw i=zev "�eyee ✓}I�% mlJx% bISTW' 1-xiW blxx o-rzrm' rxiw' ra'x ream' Neem_W'Ml wrvrmx(w) 263 m 254 24. TC. _ LINE TABLE �a Ixi% rmur _ xrozlsrllRp gg HXOfh1Y"/ UI SM 1 IY ue nee _ T'a " 262 255 yRa Tea on LI. �B 18.7 [hw eworiz¢ SA rc na+or.Jz � '� �� MCPei'NlY rbm• r MJWA1 rp.. BL SEE SHEET 29 NOTE; IIC 9613 M 4111t'ARY IY16 MO YMYFM IX116 147 IN THE CITY OF LA DUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 27 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 Mwe . almX®x a x P,Xnox rc>fnox v no rxc scum x4r 6 svnol +4 rovwP a avnx, w,4E r can, vx mwwc MMWL ecmmllM ro � mnn w,r riuor. PARDUE, CORNWELL k ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 2001 SEE SHEET 19 215 L� ,rveR»IR/ nyG rux 236 s � •..ro 4wafzyryl _ 0.1 6LL 216 6e "gip zlame .fix. - 'xiyt(vl xmv= S6G Z w 237 r xmu7et(x) G __ tan 217 =aL _ as4.se xe,x7atrX) lvnef "pia 236 wsm_ntIRJ ^�' y rain �.n .17 ,�, JOT rzxn' mii Win. 8eh i. xr m rxiro rmx' .- 1nn' al-N 235 seo New°� _ Ivorro. rc. a it- liL 219 rn4mnn keg 11ym Ianawv) Y ' Eau 14xn 234 LPe e &6� a•,a u e.uvim tr 220 �� 14Y➢4X N_'.c trO51iR I,nar PI g'i nu .�xmafm'sl iiEr i16 LOT un. 233 =6 1our�'... xooi'Je'v 3A G 221 s= E zalm.n s' xensutTx) e nve at, 292 m, r1TdP) p`qa naru�n. P4'P Xeea,,: u'vy _ a�22 c� "••• iTa iTa •q" xsrhhry LINE TABLE 9 231 maeo Ne1fSt yp� la�f mn . � SIE H � IIIGGy 0 I� rr.11 m.: rmm `t -i Ii rmsmf�^ xnsnmy SEE SHEET 28 NOTE: m am , ,u sMxmXs xmss No uoNiMln rm¢ IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 28 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 9Aq R RHwaol rc F mmu es YC14, a xa n[ zwm wu 6 4cm1 Iq 1aw51v s SwM, Ycf t Usf. sa mwmxb Wrmw, Rcmmec m rlc mxvv. H.V narsa. PARDUE, CORNWELL h ASSOCIATES. INC. MARCH. 2001 SEE SHEET 27 229 All * Ixim _� O..r evn 3 wRrb wnJbM1 CC Y e saw 230- wvuon Icon .F�x kq: as e WR ffiI y tliR Ir.>es2rc n. 'go € x91lVT < v i--n _ uam 229 xh rmn 3 for z° M. R. i 8 225 S n0 avo Ile)1pAT Z aw tall roeaya rw IS61f' ryN1e9eT R we n,ze wess'srt 228 $$n° X4. w n (`, )) F- 4G1 an acm cJ�t > J F 228 wee a=se °s4s' 'kEbp`EW ¢ 6�Lv O � qq4 CC 22'l 0.e] anv FN 95 °0 J-r r SEE SHEET 25 205 m T rare w X. g 9I X 55 290 ISAIs' i G� rIJ7 xrs'silot F-um A OT J 1.11, rI ux�n. o-em o 288 , n x»are1T mm ffiI wevmT Ia17,',.:- rwily _ &4 oP 280 J�`� (� Il mid _ s••n do �' a°es l.4X J F o DNa:fl 8+ e R 8` re 207 8 � I O]BativnX � i 3r °288 °9 £ easel s6si LOT NOTE : LINER�TABLE ur loran er 141 IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 29 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 me R mmnmx a R mnux Q mcnor v Mo >rR mum rwu m s¢ Rrl la raxnn a mum. PRrs) u+r, sPx awwmvn MAMA mmmec m rE arum Bur mrxa. PARDUE. CORNWELL k ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 2001 SEE SHEET 26 I 255 fT. 4�a IQ28rr. IO ]I IY R-r[6W IYm Mb4b1 �. vl!°Wya�Rf aG 281 i 256 - ruiz w:.:' 8 YY IaBw W M1 I .�� { F mo IVm' I IWM'°rt ppF°• htroY°Y � � tlP � O �5 I YPPP B al t 'y —� 200 iir Iro..Yn. zo.o259 �n +marp aie. dg'-u-"L^ 1 xmw'FYLL I� �.tlPl „,-- wyy�, al pi 259 258 zr,Ree .P. n osa w.. Qa0 eva. £ I�a pr qJ.! L J_r , F J T R-°5 0a v jtl ev la' $I �i xmMkr 162 3 181 180 N Ixl)3 1 aJo .s.. 159 R-pb' e+bzyR. 't� N Rrar. o° x R.sozm � LOT ayaz> e.zB°su� 'e R> e-aopav°r°+' W -_eifw pn W rRO a.a i°un 1 fix, 18 "r a�'6',R• RI fl n•z .>o> kr m arioi °p 9 :l l x�,�n W 343 344 N345 \i4a all 8 Ixem n n. o-�bew B 346 44@@ I armn�R. p p R-Brr.Oo qCS 4 R.e reo I� e`-iozTav� � a er-r)lri. ie• Rsll LOT , r„ NOTE: m RQr z mR sIR¢Iays mus un mxuwrt mRz IJ� IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 30 OF 30 SHEETS TRACT NO. 29894-2 me • vvosvox w A. a vow v wa n< vovM IwP o)snox 1a rooms v vea4 awa) saT. sr vvewmelo rmovx, Kcvmec ro 1K anion lur nPxvr. PARDUE. CORNWELL k ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH, 2001 LINE TABLE � W racrx saws ..4i/ u'x Nr J ur .. ul / N.N 3 O w LLI m M1 J°�s Ass, /n CURVE TABLE � PrM1PD DrM1M1 �D�M1, / `'DJ' Vl \/J/ e FM1yM1 e PM1DIM1M1 \ 6 L;O�(T 0" h `0.ue Pert ) w D \ v. o: q jrana s.le� LOTD � rows ro. rt. �4 e�!'•• ph D \ •1° r 0.av r n PIS? )M1b ame P'Q LI 1 F .. ,PVv I'0.aZ mu P•�p `° l �•°` J 1 PA e p DAM1M1 M1x)`� l �i°x;i� aaabaws / q 1. M1M1'D O 1,AC. T'2 � cof D Dr yM1°, . P�,D 13 '0.X my W / to usas�a oar /a, m N 0.�yi0y j)M1y J' s � •MS W ` iry LEI D5' ` �` L 3 F— W N mw LOT Fj 4 LLJ `'f DyM1` D` I0.J. mwn W / D�1 fN Lit . rare .Cif A: ° W 6 0 O I0.J5 wee Pr�> m � W A. LOT NOTE. m swsT x rm armaRs wRs xo wxxui xm¢ W awr uxcm awes mM nr xn ssm m xn m xn n. ael nv ns axa ssm ne zr.® ssm > xse mau ro um cv mm no �J� �J� ce4hr 4 4Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: - COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Authorization for Release of Subdivision Improvement — Security Associated with Tract 24317-3 PUBLIC HEARING: - Authorize the City Clerk to reduce and release subdivision improvement security for Tract 24317-3, contingent upon receiving new security bonds and a recordable Final Map, duplicated by Tract 29125. None. Tract 29125 was conditionally approved by the City Council at its June 5, 2001, meeting. As such, a subdivision improvement agreement was approved which guarantees construction of the associated improvements, estimated at $299,760. Tract 29125 is a resubdivision of a portion of Tract 24317-3, which was previously approved by the City Council in 1990. A subdivision improvement agreement for Tract 24317-3 guarantees the associated improvements, estimated at $121,238. Security provided for Tract 29125 improvements duplicates security currently held for the portion of Tract 24317-3 resubdivided by Tract 29125. For this reason, Tract 24317-3 security may be released. Therefore, security Bond No. 3SM 776 152 00 in the amount of $121,238.00 (Performance) and Bond No. 3SM 776 152 00 in the amount of $60,619.00 (Labor & Materials) may be released to the developer contingent upon receiving new security bonds. 15'' T:\P DEPT\STAFFWNDSEY\010619a Council Report .wpd The alternatives available to the City Council includes: 1 . Authorize the City Clerk to reduce and release subdivision improvement security for Tract 24317-3, contingent upon receiving new security bonds and a recordable Final Map, duplicated by Tract 29125; or 2. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Chris A. Vog Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: (I Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 153 TAPWDEMSTAFMINDSM010619a Council Report .wpd T4t!t 4 4& Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 ITEM op on of a Resolution Granting Conditional Approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 30056, Old Village at Traditions AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 30056, Old Village at Traditions, Tradition Club Association, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company. None. None. Tract 30056 is located east of Avenida Bermudas, and south of Avenue 52. This is a subdivision of lots 115 through 121, inclusive, of Tract 28867 (Attachment 1), it consists of 13 numbered lots and 2 lettered lots (Attachment 2). The developer has requested the City Council's conditional approval of the Final Map which will allow 30 days for completion of its processing. As of June 11, 2001, City staff has not received approval of the Final Map from the City's Acting Surveyor; however, it is expected that a technically correct map will be submitted within the time allowed with its conditional approval. A Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Attachment 3) has been executed by the developer; however, the associated securities have not been received. As a result, City staff has prepared the attached Resolution which provides for conditional approval of the Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement. The approval is contingent upon receipt, within 30 days (July 19, 2001), of a technically correct Final Map suitable for recording by the County Recorder with all required signatures except for the City Clerk. 154 T.\PW DEPT\STAFF\LINDSEY\TRACTS\30056\010619..Pd Once these items are received, the City Clerk will affix the City Seal to the Final Map and offer the Final Map for recording by the County Recorder. If any of the required items are not received by City staff within the specified time frame, the Final Map will be considered disapproved and will be rescheduled for City Council consideration only after all required items have been received. The developer has demonstrated to City staff that sufficient progress has been made with the documents required for conditional final map approval. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 30056, Old Village at Traditions, Tradition Club Association, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 30056, Old Village at Traditions, Tradition Club Association, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Chris A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Vicinity Map 2. Tract Map 3. Subdivision Improvement Agreement 155 0� T:\F DEP STAFF\LINDSEV\TRACTS\30056\010619.wpd RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING CONDITIONAL FINAL MAP APPROVAL OF TRACT 30056, AND AUTHORIZING A TIME EXTENSION FOR SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO VALIDATE THE APPROVAL WHEREAS, the City Council conducts only two regular meetings per month and the time interval between these meetings occasionally creates an undue hardship for business enterprises and individuals seeking approval of subdivision maps, and WHEREAS, the City Council as a matter of policy allows a subdivider to have city staff present the map for approval consideration when the requisite items necessary for final map approval are nearly, but not completely, finished thus yielding to the subdivider additional production time for preparation of those items, and WHEREAS, the subdivider has demonstrated to city staff and the City Council that it has made sufficient progress with items required for final map approval, and it is reasonable to expect the subdivider to satisfactorily complete the items, including city staff review time, within thirty (30) days without adversely impacting other ongoing work commitments of city staff, and WHEREAS, Section 66458(b) of the Subdivision Map Act grants the City Council broad authority to authorize time extensions regarding final map approval, or disapproval, upon receiving it for consideration, and WHEREAS, the City Council relies on professional city staff to review all required items for conformance with relevant requirements, and it is therefore appropriate for the City Council to approve the final map subject to review and confirmation of the required items by professional city staff, within a reasonable period of time as specified by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: Section 1. The final map for Tract 30056, is conditionally approved provided the subdivider submits all required items on or before July 19, 2001. 156 003 Resolution No. 2001- Tract 30056 Adopted: June 19, 2001 Page 2 Section 2. The City Council's approval of the final map shall not be considered valid until the City Engineer has signed the map indicating that it conforms with the tentative map, the Subdivision Map Act and all ordinances of the City. Section 3. The City Engineer shall withhold his signature from the map until the subdivider has completed the following requirements to the City Engineer's satisfaction. A. Produced a technically correct drawing of the map area that is suitable for recording by the County Recorder B. Has obtained all requisite signatures on the map title page, except for the City Clerk's signature. Section 4. The City Clerk shall withhold affixing the City Seal to the map title page, along with her attesting signature, until the City Engineer has signed the map. Section 5. The time extension for satisfying the requirements of the conditional approval for this final map shall expire when City offices close for regular business on July 19, 2001. If the subdivider has not satisfied the requirements in Section 3, herein, by the expiration deadline, the final map shall be considered disapproved. Disapproval does not deny any rights the subdivider may have under the Map Act to resubmit the final map for approval, or disapproval. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 19th day of June, 2001, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Council Members NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 1 5( 004 Resolution No. 2001- Tract 30056 Adopted: June 19, 2001 Page 3 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON , City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 158 005 Attachment 1 111 LP r _ AVE. z 50 ry 0- w CALLE TAMPICO 0 _ 0 AVE. 52 z a w o V w ry N w M PROJECT a LOCATION 0 z w > a VICINITY MAP N.T.S. TRACT MAP 30056 The Keith Companies ITKC 150 00 41-865 8owdrolk, Suite 101, Pdm 0emt, CA 92211 (760) J46-9844 Attachment 2 dj F s g Cj = .a . t�, i 1i■� if6 fit 1 �4 a a !�j I�, a I , if ag. $� � '� tatJ tri !1� , �ai! 4L F °pit 1,�•pg,pg gg 1• ° 1� �6�9 !!a§.� f� A 1 6 fill it i _ gig �1 .. 0I� 'a� I ape' 1 aM Its h r 1 f ■ o , .8 a t.' if if a t■ h O gh � �� ° � r��� Z,r r ti � Ij 'ty� t m1. 1b9(,�o , i11 , x� Y 1 Si ,ti V q � 4 gygygygygygy Im dm i; pg c g 9 e° t�ae�;;s t `� �A�lxlSl t■■■ � € p i� sat �i y r!g t 4i .t '■�'at i fe g t, � t all sit bs IVII H11111 10"s W1 16( �GQ% � g '•�4�ti•.5 i ! f1 �r 3g Falb Y e ¢9+' to p 1qit� 35ty$k GQya { !�b Y �luoJ I ng ; I i� 0 lei PIS t I •J •r 'M"^-- J 6 p _ "{ M ' C T �bxn.0 O t \B o Z qE 888 _ i r _ a R .� r----------��, J A„ 9 / aap ppkk yy yyppyykkpp! tt pp eeyy ae yy� // yyR .\�4<y�\•,�E, �000eaebeetaEBEBEnEEE688d8E6EEC6E88EE8E9 \ 1 Attachment 3 CITY OF LA QUINTA SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT Tract 30056 THIS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this day of , 2001, by and between Tradition Club Association, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, hereinafter referred to as "Subdivider," and the City of La Quinta, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City." RECITALS: A. Subdivider has prepared and filed a final map or parcel map (the "Map") of a unit of land in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, which unit of land is known as Tract No. 30056 (the "Tract") pursuant to the provisions of Section 66410, et sec. of the California Government Code (the "Subdivision Map Act"). B. Prior to approval of the Map, Subdivider is required to install or agree to install certain public and private improvements (the "Improvements"). C. The Improvements have not been installed and accepted at this time. D. It is therefore necessary that Subdivider and City enter into an agreement for the installation of the Improvements as provided in Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Improvement Plans. Prior to submittal of the Map for approval by the City Council, Subdivider shall furnish original improvement plans meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. 2. Improvements. Subdivider shall construct the public and private street, drainage, utility, landscaping, and other improvements required to be constructed or agreed to be constructed under this Agreement as listed in Exhibit "A", and shall bear the full cost thereof. The methods, standards, specifications, sequence, and scheduling of construction shall be as approved by the City Engineer. 3. Improvement Security. A. One class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "performance security," shall assure the faithful performance of this Agreement including construction of the Improvements, payment of Subdivider's fair share of Improvements which have been or will be constructed by others ("Participatory Improvements"), and payment of plan check and permit fees. A second class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "payment security," shall assure the payment of the cost of labor, equipment and materials supplied to construct the Improvements. A third class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "warranty security," shall serve as a guarantee and warranty of the Improvements for a period of one year following the completion and acceptance of the Improvements. Subdivider shall furnish performance and payment security prior to and as a condition of City Council approval of the Map. Subdivider shall provide warranty security after Improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council and prior to or concurrently with the final release of performance security. Warranty security shall not be required for Monumentation or Participatory Improvements. However, the City may utilize Monumentation Security for performance of or payment for the work in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. As part of the obligation secured by each of the performance security, payment security and warranty security, and in addition to the face amount of each such security, each such security shall include and assure the payment of costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing the obligations thereby secured. B. Improvement security shall conform with Section 66499 of the California Government Code and one or more of the following: 1) A cash deposit with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company, at City's option. 1 G^ (10 T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEY\TRACTS\30056\S I Agreement.wpd Page 1 of 6 2) Surety bonds, of the form specified in subsection 66499.2 of the California Government Code, issued by a surety or sureties listed in the U.S. Department of Treasury Circular 570 (latest version). 3) Certificates of deposit, in City's name, from one or more financial institutions subject to regulation by the state or federal government and having a financial quality rating of "A" or better and a commitment reliability rating of "R-2" or better on the Investment Data Exchange (of the Los Angeles County Treasurer's office). 4) Irrevocable letters of credit, issued by one or more financial institutions meeting the requirements of Paragraph (3), pledging that the funds necessary to carry out the completion of the Improvements are on deposit, guaranteed for payment, and constitute a trust fund which is not subject to levy or attachment by any creditor of the depositor until released by City. Letters of credit shall guarantee that all or any portion of the funds available pursuant to the letters of credit will be paid upon the written demand of City and that such written demand need not present documentation of any type as a condition of payment, including proof of loss. The duration of any such letter of credit shall be for a period of not less than one year from the execution of the agreement with which it is provided and shall state, on its face, that the letter of credit will be automatically renewed until such time that City authorizes its expiration or until sixty (60) days after City receives notice from the financial institution of intent to allow expiration of the letter of credit. 5) A lien upon the subdivided property, if City finds that it would not be in the public interest to require the installation of the Improvements sooner than two (2) years after recordation of the final map or parcel map for which the Improvements are required. The lien shall provide a collateral value of three (3) times the estimated cost of the Improvements and shall include the power of sale of the real property, all buildings and improvements thereon, or that may be erected upon or made thereto, together with all hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in any wise appertaining, and the reservations, remainders, rents, issues, and profits thereof. The collateral value of the property shall be established at Subdivider's expense through an appraisal approved by City. 6) An instrument of credit from an agency of the state, federal or local government, when any agency of the state, federal, or local government provides at least Twenty Percent (20%) of the financing for the Improvements. 7) When Subdivider is a non-profit organization, security may be negotiable bonds, of the kind approved for securing deposits of public moneys with City or in favor of City, as specified in Section 16430 of the California Government Code, deposited, at City's option, with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company. C. All securities shall be furnished in accordance with the provisions of Exhibit A. The amount of the performance security shall equal One Hundred Percent (100%) of the estimated cost of constructing the Improvements, including payment of plan check and permit fees, as estimated by the City Engineer or a duly authorized representative of the City Engineer. The amount of Payment security shall equal the amount of the amount of performance security, except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A, and shall be furnished as a separate security. Warranty security shall equal Ten Percent (10%) of the amount of performance security except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A. D. At the time of submittal of security, Subdivider shall pay to City administrative fees applicable to the form of security provided. Administrative fees shall apply to the subdivision (final map, parcel map or waiver of parcel map) rather than to individual security instruments. The fees shall be paid separately for each different form and/or source (surety or financial institution) of security initially submitted and for substitution of securities but shall not be required for submittal of warranty security if the warranty security is of the same form and from the same source as the performance security it replaces. Administrative fees for security shall be as follows: 1) For certificates of deposit, bonds and letters of credit as described in Paragraphs 2), 3) and 4) of SECTION 3.B., which require the establishment of evidence of the reliability of the surety or financial institution, the administrative fee shall be One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00). 2) For liens on real property as described in Paragraph 5) of SECTION 3.B., for which City will prepare lien agreements and subordination agreements, administer valuation of the real property and administer +� the agreements over the life of the lien, all of which require legal assistance and financial advice, Subdivider shall pay to City an administration fee of One Half of One Percent (0.5%) of the estimated cost of the improvements secured but not less than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) nor more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00). il�.� T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEY\TRACTS\30056\S I Agreement.wpd Page 2 of 6 3) For other forms of security listed in Section 3 B, above, there will be no administrative fee. E. Participatory Improvements, if any, are identified in Exhibit A. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place until the Participatory Improvements are constructed and actual costs are known and paid by Subdivider, or until Subdivider pays to City the estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements, and shall guarantee the reimbursement by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost of the Participatory Improvements. Payment security and warranty security shall not be required for Participatory Improvements. Upon written demand from City, Subdivider shall deposit cash with City in lieu of or in replacement of security guaranteeing Participatory Improvements. If Subdivider fails to deposit said cash within 30 days of the date of the written demand from City, City may present a written demand to Subdivider's Surety for payment of said cash and Subdivider's Surety shall pay to City the lesser of: 1) the amount demanded, or 2) the amount of the security. F. Security shall not expire, be reduced or become wholly or partially invalid for any reason, including non-payment of premiums, modifications of this Agreement and/or expiration of the time for performance stated in this Agreement, without express authorization from City unless the surety provides City with sixty (60) days written notice by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. G. Security shall be released in the following manner: 1) Performance security shall be released upon the final completion and acceptance or approval, by the City Council of the Improvements subject to the provisions of paragraph B. 2) The City Engineer may authorize partial reduction of performance security as work progresses, upon application by Subdivider. However, no such reduction shall be for an amount less than Ten Percent (10%) of the total performance security provided for the faithful performance of the act or work. In no event shall security be reduced below that required to guarantee the completion of the act or work or obligation secured, plus Ten Percent (10%). The City Engineer shall not allow more than two partial reductions of security furnished for any improvement agreement. 3) Participatory Improvement security shall be released upon payment by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost or estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements. 4) If City receives no notice of recorded claims of lien, labor and materials security shall be released in full 90 days after final acceptance and/or approval by the City Council, of the Improvements. If City receives notice of any recorded lien, the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act shall apply. 5) Warranty security not utilized during the warranty period shall be released one year after final acceptance or approval by the City Council of all Tract Improvements. However, if at the end of the one-year warranty period, there are one or more outstanding requests by City for performance of work or provision of materials under the terms of the warranty, warranty security shall be retained until the outstanding requests are satisfied or until Subdivider has made other arrangements satisfactory to the City Engineer. 4. Permits Required. Prior to commencing any phase of work, Subdivider shall obtain all permits required for that phase of work and pay all required fees. Work performed under a permit or permits shall comply with all provisions of the required permits. 5. Off -site Improvements. When the construction of one or more of the Improvements requires or necessitates the acquisition of real property not owned by Subdivider or City, Subdivider shall use its best efforts purchase such real property at a reasonable price. In the event that Subdivider is unsuccessful, despite its best efforts, to acquire such real property at a reasonable price, Subdivider may request in writing that City attempt to acquire such real property. City may, but is not required to, agree to attempt to acquire such real property on behalf of Subdivider. If City so agrees, City and Subdivider shall enter a separate written agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Said separate agreement shall provide that Subdivider advance to City One Hundred Fifty Percent (150%) of the appraised fair market value of the real property. Any unexpended portion of said advance shall be refunded to Subdivider. Any additional funds required for acquisition of the real property shall be paid by 1 A r Subdivider to City upon the conveyance of said real property to Subdivider. In no event shall the failure of U Subdivider or City to acquire such real property excuse, waive, or otherwise terminate Subdivider's obligation to construct the applicable improvement pursuant to this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval. nl? T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEY\TRACTS\30056\S I Agreement.wpd Page 3 of 6 6. Completion of Improvements. Subdivider shall begin construction of the Improvements within ninety (90) days and shall complete construction within twelve (12) months after the approval of this Agreement. Portions of the Improvements may be completed at a later date, as determined by the City Engineer or as set forth in Exhibit A. Failure by Subdivider to begin or complete construction of the Improvements within the specified time periods shall constitute cause for City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare Subdivider in default of this agreement, to revise improvement security requirements as necessary to ensure completion of the improvements, and/or to require modifications in the standards or sequencing of the Improvements in response to changes in standards or conditions affecting or affected by the Improvements. Said failure shall not otherwise affect the validity of this agreement or Subdivider's obligations hereunder. 7. Force Maieure. In the event that Subdivider is unable to perform within the time limits herein due to strikes, act of God, or other events beyond Subdivider's control, the time limits for obligations affected by such events will be extended by the period of such events. 8. Time Extension. Subdivider may make application in writing to the City Council for an extension of time for completion of the Improvements. The City Council, in its sole and absolute discretion, may approve or deny the request or conditionally approve the extension with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. As a condition of the time extension, Subdivider shall furnish securities, similar in form and substance to those required in SECTION 3 hereinabove, to cover the period of extension. The value of the securities shall be sufficient to ensure the performance of and payment for Improvements that remain incomplete at the time of the extension, and to provide warranty security on completed Improvements. 9. Survey Monuments. Before final approval of street improvements, Subdivider shall place survey monuments in accordance with the provisions of Sections 66495, et sec. of the Subdivision Map Act and of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Subdivider shall provide the City Engineer written proof that the monuments have been set, evidence of payment and receipt thereof by the engineer or surveyor setting the monuments, and intersection monument tie -outs for monuments set in public streets. 10. Final Acceptance of Improvements. At the completion of construction and prior to acceptance of the Improvements by City, Subdivider shall submit a request for final approval by City. The request shall be accompanied by any required certifications from Subdivider's engineers or surveyors, approval letters from other agencies having jurisdiction over and approval authority for improvements required by this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval, and any required construction quality documentation not previously submitted. Upon receipt of said request, the City Engineer or a duly -authorized representative will review the required documentation and will inspect the Improvements. If the Improvements are determined to be in accordance with applicable City standards and specifications, and as provided herein, obligations required by the Conditions of Approval and this Agreement have been satisfied, and Subdivider has provided revised plans as required in Paragraph 11, hereinafter, the City Engineer shall recommend acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council. 11. Revisions to Plans. When the Improvements have been inspected and approved by the City Engineer, Subdivider shall make any necessary revisions to the original plans held by City so the plans depict the actual Improvements constructed. When necessary revisions have been made, each separate sheet of the plans shall be clearly marked with the words "As -Built," "As -Constructed," or "Record Drawing; the marking shall be stamped by an engineer or surveyor, as appropriate for the improvements thereon, who is licensed to practice in California, and the plans shall be resubmitted to the City Engineer. 12. Improvement Warranty. Subdivider hereby guarantees the Improvements to City for a period of one (1) year, beginning on the date of final acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council, against any defective work or labor done, or defective materials furnished, and shall repair or replace such defective work or materials. 13. Release of Security. City shall retain and release securities in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of this agreement. Prior to the release of payment security, the City Engineer may require Subdivider to provide a title report or other evidence sufficient to show claims of lien, if any, that may affect the amount of payment security released. 16 J 14. City Right to Cure. If Subdivider fails to perform any obligation hereunder and such obligation has not been performed within sixty (60) days after written notice of default from City, then City may perform the obligation, 013 T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEY\TRACTS\30056\S I Agreement.wpd Page 4 of 6 and Subdivider shall pay the entire cost of such performance by City including costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing such obligation. In cases of emergency or compelling public interest, as determined by the City Engineer, the requirement for written notice of default and/or the passage of sixty (60) days shall be deemed waived and all other provisions of this Article shall remain in effect. 15. Indemnification. Subdivider hereby binds itself, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, executors, administrators, guarantors, heirs, and assigns, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold City and its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and assigns harmless from and against any losses, claims, demands, actions, or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, arising out of or in any way connected with Subdivider's performance herein under, including costs of suit and reasonable attorneys' fees. 16. No Modification of Conditions. This Agreement shall in no respect act to modify or amend any provision of the Conditions of Approval. In the event that any requirement or condition of this Agreement is inconsistent with or fails to include one or more provisions of the Conditions of Approval, which document(s) is (are) incorporated herein by reference, the provisions in the Conditions of Approval shall remain in effect and shall control. 17. Severability. In the event that any provision or provisions of this Agreement are held unenforceable, all provisions not so held shall remain in full force and effect. 18. General Provisions A. All notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the parties at their respective addresses indicated hereon. Notices personally delivered shall be effective upon delivery. Notices mailed as provided herein and sent postage prepaid shall be effective upon the date of delivery or refusal indicated on the return receipt. Either party may change its address for notices hereunder by notice to the other given in the manner provided in this subparagraph. B. The terms, conditions, covenants, and agreements set forth herein shall apply to and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors of the parties hereto. C. Neither party to this Agreement relies upon any warranty or representation not contained in this Agreement. D. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted with respect to the laws of the State of California. E. In the event of any dispute between the parties with respect to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to prompt payment of its reasonable attorneys' fees from the non -prevailing party. F. Any failure or delay by either party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any such rights or remedies provided for hereunder. 166 T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEY\TRACTS\30056\S I Agreement.wpd O'l4 Page 5 of 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. CITY: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk SUBDIVIDER: By: Title: By: Title: Reviewed and Approved: City Engineer Approved as to Form: City Attorney Date Date City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 7601777-7075 Tradition Club Associates, LLC 78505 Old Avenue 52 La Quinta, CA 92253 (760)564-3355 Date Date 167 (1 15 T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEY\TRACTS\30056\S I Agreement.wpd Page 6 of 6 Exhibit A SECURITY - TRACT 30056 Except as otherwise provided herein, Subdivider shall furnish performance security and labor & materials security prior to agendization of the Map for approval by the City Council. Improvements designated as "Participatory" have been or will be constructed by others. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place indefinitely until called upon or released by City. Monumentation security shall guarantee performance of or payment for the work and shall be utilized or released as specified in Chapter 4, Article 9 of the Subdivision Map Act. The "Engineering & Plans" security will be released when the City has possession of complete, approved, original plans, signed and sealed by a design professional(s), for all required improvements. The "No -Plan Contingency', which may be utilized for any listed item or for other cost found necessary in the design or construction of the required improvements, may be released in whole or part by the City Engineer, at any time after construction plans are complete and the scope and nature of improvements are fully known. These releases shall be separate from and in addition to the reductions discussed below. As elements of the work are completed, Subdivider may request a maximum of two partial releases of performance security. Partial releases shall be for not less than ten percent (10%) of the total performance security for the tract and shall not reduce total performance security below the amount necessary to complete the Improvements plus ten percent (10%) of the original amount. Partial releases of performance security will be evaluated and may be granted, in whole or in part, by the City Engineer. Requests for partial releases, setting forth in detail the amount of work completed and the value thereof, shall be made in writing to the City Engineer. Labor & materials security shall remain in place until 90 days after all required tract improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council. Improvement Description Performance Labor & Materials Grading (On -site) 177,600 177,600 Street Improvements (On -site) 68,665 68,665 Domestic Water (On -site) 21,630 21,630 Sanitary Sewer (On -site) 31,800 31,800 Dry Utility/Electrical (On -site) 10,000 10,000 Monumentation 5,000 0 Construction Subtotal: $314,695 $309,695 Engineering & Plans (20% of Construction) 62,940 No -Plans Contingency (10% of Project) 37,763 Total: $415,398 16S n1Q AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 2 CONSENT CALENDAR: �J ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Acceptance of Grant of Easement Deed for Certificate of Compliance 2001-022, Waived Parcel PUBLIC HEARING: Map 28435 Accept a Grant of Easement Deed for public street and public utility purposes for Certificate of Compliance 2001-022, Waived Parcel Map 28435 (La Quinta Medical/ Commercial, Plaza Tampico). There are no fiscal implications to the acceptance of the easement. None. Parcel Map 28435 (La Quinta Medical/ Commercial, Plaza Tampico) is being processed as a waived Parcel Map. The lots are being created to divide the existing Plaza Tampico development into two separate pieces for the possible sale of either parcel to another individual or corporation. The reason for the waiver is that all improvements are in place or bonded for. The applicant has been conditioned to prepare a reciprocal access agreement for recordation with the final map application ensuring both parcels have a common access through and over each lot and shared use of the existing parking facilities pursuant to the parking easement provided with respect to Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 27109, as set forth on said Parcel Map 27109, for Plaza Tampico in perpetuity. The applicant has also been conditioned to remove the existing walls from the corner cutback required herein and reconstruct the walls along the new cutback line. By acceptance of this Grant of Easement Deed the applicant will have fulfilled this condition. Included as Attachment 1 is the Grant of Easement Deed executed and notarized by the owners to grant perpetual easement and right-of-way for public street and public utility purposes, in, on, under, across and through all that real property described per Exhibit "A" and as shown on Exhibit "B". 169 T:IPWDEPr STAFFLLINDSEY\010619 Council Report wpdwptl The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Accept a Grant of Easement Deed for public street and public utility purposes for Certificate of Compliance 2001-022, Waived Parcel Map 28435 (La Quinta Medical/ Commercial, Plaza Tampico); or 2. Do not accept a Grant of Easement Deed for public street and public utility purposes for Certificate of Compliance 2001-022, Waived Parcel Map 28435 (La Quinta Medical/ Commercial, Plaza Tampico); or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Chris A. vog Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Grant of Easement Deed lto 002 T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEV\010619 Council Report wpE.wpd Attachment 1 No Recording Fee Required Per Government Code Section 27383 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Sp. .Hove fh tine u rt.. (.r Re ..a .... GRANT OF EASEMENT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, LA QUINTA MEDICAL/COMMERCIAL PLAZA, LTD., a California Limited Partnership, (the Grantor), hereby grants to CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California Municipal Corporation, (the Grantee), a perpetual easement and right-of-way for public street and public utility purposes, in, on, under, across and through all that real property described per Exhibit "A" and as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. This easement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of successors, heirs, executors, administrators, permittees, licensees, agents or assigns of Grantor and Grantee. Executed this day of 2001, at , California. LA QUINTA MEDICAL/COMMERICAL PLAZA, LTD., A CA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: Laeroc Partners, Inc Its: General Partner Peter S. Morgan, Executive Vice President 171 PARCEL ttEfOER No. 029U5 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT No. APPR EgYCITY OF LA QUINTA COMELOPMENT DEPA M NT BY ATE a 0 4 E— bi EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS "A" AND "B" OF WAIVED PARCEL MAP 28435 BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN BY PARCEL MAP NO. 27109, RECORDED IN PMB 175/1-2, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; LYING IN A PORTION OF HE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, T6S, R7E, S.B.M, MORE PARTICULARLY T DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT "A" G AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 1 OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. BEGINNIN 27109; THENCE S89059'54"W ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CALLE TAMPICO, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE N44059'18"E TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, A DISTANCE OF 35.35 FEET; THENCE S00°O1'19'B ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SEASONS WAY, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 312 S.F. (0.01 ACRES) MORE OR LESS. LOT "B" BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 1 OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 27109; THENCE N00001' 19"W ALONG THE EASTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SEASONS WAY, A DISTANCE OF 415.16 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N45001'20"W TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, A DISTANCE OF 28.28 FEET; THENCE N89058'39"E ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SPRINGTIME WAY, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE S00001' 19"E ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SEASONS WAY, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 200 S.F. (0.01 ACRES) MORE OR LESS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: "f- -- /i - st-� - Z� _— Ly51A R. SHINOHARA,13�La 1 MY LICENSE EXPIRES 1 T LMNi4E - r...3,2i.2 joy DATE 17? 0 f'15 EXHIBIT$IB" """ ' v` WAIVED PARCEL MAP NO. 28435 BEING1 AND 2. IOFI PJARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OFOF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL PRIVERSIDE � COUNTYION FILENCAUFO175 AGES RNIA. LUNG IN A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, T.6S., R.76E., S.B.M. WI > SPRINGTIME Cal U I PAR. 1 f.. l Q I LINE DATA BEARING I A N89'58 39 E 20.00 N00'0119 W 20.00 L3 N450120 W 28.28 L4 N89'5954 E 25.00 15 N00'0119 W 25.00 L6 N445918 E 35.35 , I i PARCEL I L-- ° POB LOT 'B' DEAL T ;I �I 30' u� LOT 7' DETAIL T 1 "= 50' i I7 PAR. 2 I ��Og I L4� POC/POB 30' I 'A' �, e PARCEL DETAL 2 I 1,.=50' 4AgG�y P.REI NO. No. I 1 OT LIN I ADJUSTMENT �` UUINTA i I g CITY OF T vrIL ME DEPA b / 1 coI IIMM ------- --- POC/POB LOT Loy k Ex'C-- CALLS -----—--------- TAMPIGO N8959'54-E DETAL-'A' — ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: '' 770-020-011 (2n 6 OWNER: LA QUINTA MEDICAL/COMMERCIAL PLAZA LTD. 2 1334 PARKVIEW AVE., STE. 240 MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 DR (310) 796-1484 ENGINEER: PACIFIC ENGINEERING •& ASSOCIATES pOeRFSH/*0 e, y Ob �`� CIVIL ENGINEERING • PLANNING - SURVEYING �r o '9y 2„ *E�-� ITE 41-230 CARLOTTA DRIVE DESERT, CA 92211 NO. 32182 vPALM DEC. 31, 2004 O(760) * 346-426a FAX (760) 779-5994 CIV\�. �P L .1AF= MY REGISTRATION EXPIRES 12/31/04 N.T.S. r COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Dedication of Public Utility Easement along Highway 111- La Quinta Corporate Center AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Accept four grants of easement conveying right of way for public utility purposes adjacent to Highway 111 for La Quinta Corporate Center. None. None. La Quinta Corporate Center is bordered by Highway 111 on the south, Dune Palms Road on the east, and Adams Street on the west. Dedication of this right of way will create an easement for public utilities along Highway 111 for La Quinta Corporate Center. It was originally anticipated that underground utilities would be installed in the highway right of way. However, Caltrans has rejected that concept. As a result, some of the utilities will be installed in the 10-foot public utility easement adjacent to the highway right of way as proposed in the attached grants of easement. Included as Attachment 1 are four grants of easement executed and notarized by the owners to dedicate right-of-way along Highway 111 for public utility purposes to the City of La Quinta. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Accept four grants of easement conveying right of way for public utility purposes adjacent to Highway 111 for La Quinta Corporate Center; or 2. Do not accept four grants of easement conveying right of way for public utility T:\PWDEPT\COUNCU2001\010619Lwp4 174 purposes adjacent to Highway 1 1 1 for La Quinta Corporate Center; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, �X,i Chris A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Grants of Easement 1(5 002 TAPW DEPT\COUNCIL\2001 \010619f. wpd Attachment NO RECORDING FEE REQUIRED PER GOVT. CODE, SECTION 27383 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledge, THE GRANTOR, PALISADES GAS AND WASH, INC., a California corporation, hereby grants to CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation, hereinafter after referred to as GRANTEE, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for public utility purposes, in, on, under, across and through all that real property described in Exhibit "A" and "B:", attached hereto and made a part hereof. Executed this 23rgk day of May, 2001, at ourA- �' S California. Palisades Gas and Wash, Inc., By: ';"' 'vr�^n Its PCES:Dti 1T STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ) S.S. On 22J 2(i0 before me, /\.�ii� h/t Z 4 FkJI (_ (here insert name n itleoftheofficer),personallyappeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactor'evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. KIM PLATI 7 Commission N 1201749 i Notary Public - CarifaNa Los Angeles County �WCarnm.BgiesNov 16, /2D02 Signature IWYi �" oe E1 DOCUMENT PROVIDED BY STEW/ RT TITLE OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 1/6 GRNTDEED.DOC 004 EXHIBIT "A" PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT THE SOUTHERLY 10.00 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, OF PARCEL 4 OF CITY OF LA QUINTA LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 99-316 AS SHOWN BY DEED RECORDED JANUARY 27, 2000 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 30493, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING NORTHERLY OF PARCEL 4 OF A RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA RECORDED JULY 11, 2000 AS INSTRUMENT NO.267425, AND EASTERLY OF RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA RECORDED JANUARY 13, 1997 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 10633. SAID PORTION CONTAINS 2,400 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION BEING SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "B" AND HEREBY BEING MADE A PART HEREOF. Page 1 of 1 \\KEITHSC01 Wet-O\CFP2000\40571\SURVEY\NEW PUE\USA-GAS.doc THE KEITH COMPANIES - PALM DESERT TKC # 40571.00.012 760-346-9844 760-346-9368 • PARCEL 3 LLA 99-316 1/27/2000 130493 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF LA OUINTA 1/13/1997 110633 EXHIBIT "B1e PARCEL 4 LLA 99-316 1/27/2000 #30493 60' RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED o2 TO THE CITY OF LA OUINTA 7/11/2000 1267425 HIGHWAY 111 rd SCALE 1" =100' 0 50 100 200 300 PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATION 177 PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: Sip LAND SCR KE<(E,S,P`n��P The Keith Companies MCC No. 6687 4 % J Eap. 06/30/04 DALE KELAHER DATE: srgTf CL\f Q 41-865 eoord"olk, suite 101. Palm Desert, CA 92211 (760) 346-9844 LS 6687 EXP. 6-30-04 OF NO RECORDING FEE REQUIRED PER GOV'T. CODE, SECTION 27383 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledge, THE GRANTOR, RAYMOND TROLL, Trustee of the Raymond Troll Trust, dated September 16,1994, hereby grants to CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation, hereinafter after referred to as GRANTEE, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for public utility purposes, in, on, under, across and through all that real property described in Exhibit "A" and "B:", attached hereto and made a part hereof. Executed this /4 day of May, 2001, at f-"i44 K/AW r- , California. THE RAYMOND TROLL TRUST ESTABLISHED SEPTEMBER 16, 1994 STATE OF CALIFORNIA�'' " } COUNTY OF /��1 tJ (/La.�t ) S.S. (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the personmwhose n subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/�*/tWy executed the same in his@Q/tb<r authorized and that by his// /tXr signatureKon the instrument the personX, or the entity upon behalf of which the personXacted, instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. •. r��c -.: • GRWDEED.D EXHIBIT "A" PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT THE SOUTHERLY 10.00 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, OF PARCEL 3 OF CITY OF LA QUINTA LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 99-316 AS SHOWN BY DEED RECORDED JANUARY 27, 2000 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 30493, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING NORTHERLY OF PARCEL 2 OF A RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA RECORDED JULY 11, 2000 AS INSTRUMENT NO.267425, AND WESTERLY OF RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA RECORDED JANUARY 13, 1997 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 10633. SAID PORTION CONTAINS 1,332 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION BEING SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "B" AND HEREBY BEING MADE A PART HEREOF. Page 1 of 1 No. 6687 Exp. 06/30/04 P PA D OD NE SUPERVISION OF 1 DAL LE DATE \\KEITHSCOi\Net-O\CFP2000\40571\SURVEYWEW PUE\TROLL.doc THE KEITH COMPANIES - PALM DESERT 179 760-346-9844 760-346-9368 006 TKC # 40571.00.012 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF LA OUINTA 7/11/2000 1267425 EXHIBIT "B" PARCEL 3 LLA 99-316 1/27/2000 #30493 'RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF LA OUINTA 1/13/1997 110633 PARCEL 4 LEA 99-316 1/27/2DDO 130493 b HIGHWAY 111 M ■MR M SCALE 1" =100' 0 50 100 200 300 PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATION 180 PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: Sao LAND sG� KE((F ti The Keith Companies Inca �fNo. 6687 Epp. 06/30/04 {S 41-865 Boordwolk, Suite 101, Pekn Desert, G 92211 (760) 346-9844 DALE KEIiEHER DATE: TgrE LS 6687 EXP. 6-30-04 NO RECORDING FEE REQUIRED PER GOV'T. CODE, SECTION 27383 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 La Quints, CA 92253 GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledge, THE GRANTOR, 111 VENTURE, LLC, a California limited liability company, hereby grants to CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation, hereinafter after referred to as GRANTEE, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for public utility purposes, in, on, under, across and through all that real property described in Exhibit "A" and "B:", attached hereto and made a part hereof. Executed this )7 day of May, 2001, at J�ry i K 2 , California. 111 VENTURE, LLC, a California limited liability company, By: SCS Family Limited Partnership, a Nevada limited partnership By: Woodpark Development Company, Inc., A California corporation, Manager By:. 46e,'1/Y/c4 -"'Scott ayner, President STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF p C } S.S. On before me, CZ41�yt— �, , (here insert name and titl ftheo icer ersornallya eared n%p d.. �rfr (or roved to me on the basis o satisfactory evidence) to be the person(y whose name((&) ishw subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sk Ill; executed the same in his/herA"* authorized capecity0*, and that by his/heiAl etr signature(si on the instrument the person(ly, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(w acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. �(1? /I 41-5ERT E E!D m COMM... 1193970 n ,L NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIA FORN °i✓, ORANGE COUNTY My Term Eep, Aug. 20, 2002 181 DOCUMENT PROVIDED 81 STEWART TITLE OF CALIFORNIA. INC. GRNTDEED OOC 007 07 EXHIBIT "A7' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT THE SOUTHERLY 10.00 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, OF PARCELS 10 AND 12 OF PARCEL MAP 29351 AS SHOWN IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 193, PAGES 33 THROUGH 36, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA. Page 1 of 1 O:1CFP2000b0571\SURVEYWEW PUE1111VNTUR.doe TKC # 40571.00.012 No. 6687 Exp. 06/30/04 PR NDE E SUPERVISION OF D N7AL LEH DATE THE KEITH COMPANIES - PALM DESERT 760-346-9844 760-346-9368 18^ .0 tiAZ NQ�� T0?HE�1uY 112MOOF (AA —_ EXHIBIT "B" PARPU Lu1 PUS 193/33-36 HIGHWAY -�111 TO E�OF OF WAY �gOGI11Nq 7/11/2000 1267 QUI SCALE 1a=200' 0 160 200 400 600 PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATION PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF:� NANO SLR v�op�E KEC(fy���oa The Keith Companies MMC `1 No. 6681 4 t tom. D5/30/04 {t DALE K "FHER DATE: srq 41-865 e00.n ak SO* 101. Palm 0asert, G 922tt (760) J46-9844 LS 6687 EXP. 6-30-04 POF CAS NO RECORDING FEE REQUIRED PER GOV'T. CODE, SECTION 27383 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledge, THE GRANTOR, BAYSHORE OIL COMPANY, INC., a California corporation, hereby grants to CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation, hereinafter after referred to as GRANTEE, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for public utility purposes, in, on, under, across and through all that real property described in Exhibit "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part hereof. i Executed this_ By of May, 2001, at ?'<� �4alifornia. BAY SHORE OIL COMPANY, INC., a California corporation E�scc � By:_J 1✓! % �� STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF } S.S. On ..��}-f' -bl before me, /�,pL.C-L9� C -sue=�f �(9ofh %i fc�ZLI ,(here insert names d title of the officer), personally appeared co z.F—rtb D s ✓L /FP Vi ' /Z t s a&� r 5 *10 i CorwPtwoY /A-'G. Cr If C-o o personally known tome )to be the erson(prwhose name is re subscribed to thgwithin instrument and acknowledged to me that held hey executed the same in hisi 'their authorized capacity(iasj; and that by hisfSejltheir signature(4 on the instrument the person(alor the entity upon behalf of which the persono acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. MARLENE R. SARNE Otilivurrm CarrlmhWn S 1158762 z 1'1�yPublic-CQBfomio tns Angeles County Bgiea Nov 11,2MI i Signature DOCUMENT PROVIDED BY STEWART TITLE OF CALIFORNIA, INC. GRNTOEEDDOC MR a 0 a EXHIBIT "B" Hl� DDD /26)�31NTq T r��- RIGHT OF WAY DEDI 0 THE CITY OUTED 7111/2DOt °126, ?41 NTA SCALE 1"=100' 0 50 100 200 300 PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATION The Keith Companies IrFcc 41-865 Boordwolk, Suite 101, Polm Desert, CA 92211 (760) 346-9844 PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: 51170VV- DALE KELEHER DATE:1 8 LS 6687 EXP. 6-30-04 No. 6687 Exp. 06/w/a EXHIBIT "A" PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT THE SOUTHERLY 10.00 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, OF LOT B OF CITY OF LA QUINTA LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 96-230 AS SHOWN BY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 20, 1996 AS INSTRUMENT NO.479502, LYING NORTHERLY OF PARCEL 2 OF CITY OF LA QUINTA RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION RECORDED JULY 11, 2000 AS INSTRUMENT NO.267423. SAID PORTION CONTAINS 3,257 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION BEING SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 'B" AND HEREBY BEING MADE A PART HEREOF. No. 6687 Exp. 06/30/04 Page 1 of 1 Pr RED U fh SUPERVISION OF May 17. 2001 ffALY DATE O:\CFP2000\40571\SURVEYWEW PUE\DUNLAP.doc THE KEI H COMPANIES - PALM DESERT TKC # 40571.00.012 760-346.9844 760-346-9368 18s (?l)(') COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Project No. 98-16, Fritz Burns Park Fence Rehabilitation Improvements AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: /5 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Accept Project No. 98-16, Fritz Burns Park Fence Rehabilitation Improvements as 100% complete; and Authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and Authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $$8,429.64, 35 days after the Notice of Completion is recorded. Adequate funds totaling $ 13,553 are available to pay the contractor retention. Since RDA funding is being utilized for this project, the City bid the project with prevailing wage requirements. Therefore, there are no Charter City implications. On April 18, 2000, the City Council approved the project plans and specifications, and engineer's estimate for the Fritz Burns Park Fence Rehabilitation Improvements, Project No. 98-16; and authorized staff to advertise the Fritz Burns Park Fence Rehabilitation Improvement Project for bids. During this meeting, staff informed the City Council that additional revenue would be required to complete the project. On July 10, 2000, the City received one bid from Quality Fence Company, Inc. to construct the Fritz Burns Park Fence Rehabilitation Improvements, Project No. 98-16. On August 1, 2000, City Council appropriated an additional $ 51,585.38 from RDA Project Area No. 1 funds toward the Fritz Burns Park Fence Rehabilitation Improvements, approved the revised project budget, and awarded a contract in the 187 T:\PW OEPT\COUNCIL\2001 \010619d.wpd amount of $93,316.40 to Quality Fence Company, Inc. to construct Project No. 98- 161 Fritz Burns Park Fence Rehabilitation Improvements. The project's construction effort and punchlist is now deemed to be 100% complete and is in compliance with the plans and specifications. Prior to filing the Notice of Completion, staff must receive authorization from the City Council to approve this project as 100% complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion. The following is a summary of Final Accounting of this Contract Original Bid $93,316.40 Change Orders # 1-4 $14,090.00 Total $107,406.40 Amount Paid to Date ($94,091.76) Outstanding CCO #2 Invoice ($4,885.00) RETENTION TO BE RELEASED $8,429.64 The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Accept Project No. 98-16 Fritz Burns Park Fence Rehabilitation Improvements as 100% complete; and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $8,429.64, 35 days after the Notice of Completion is recorded; or 2. Do not accept Project No. 98-16 Fritz Burns Park Fence Rehabilitation Improvements as 100% complete; and do not authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and do not authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $8,429.64, 35 days after the Notice of Completion is recorded; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. 188 002 TAMOEMCOUNCU2001\010619d.w Od Respectfully submi ed, Y��. Chris A. Voge Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager FM T: W WDEPT\COUNCIL\2001 \010619E, wpd 003 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: f Fit" 040 OXXXV 0310111:71 F BUSINESS SESSION: June 19, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Investment Policy of the City of La Quinta for Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving the Investment Policy of the City of La Quinta for Fiscal Year 2001 /2002. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None CHARTER CITY IMPLICATION 1►rem BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: SB564 imposes certain reporting requirements on State and local agencies. Specifically, the bill requires, in part, that the treasurer of a local agency submit an annual statement of investment policy to the legislative body. As a result of this reporting requirement, in March of 2001, the Investment Advisory Board (IAB) began the process of updating the City's Investment Policy to conform with this legislative requirement. On June 13, 2001, the Investment Advisory Board met with the City Manager, City Attorney and City Treasurer to review the proposed Investment Policy. The proposed Investment Policy redline form is included as Attachment 1 . 190 At their June 13, 2001 meeting, the IAB voted, by a 4-0-2 vote (Ayes: Board Members Lewis, Olander, Mahfoud and Chairman Osborne, Noes: None, Absent: Board Member Moulin and Felice), to submit the proposed Investment Policy to the City Council for consideration. The Investment Advisory Board has spent the last four months working on the City Investment Policy. The general purpose of the City's Investment Policy is to provide the rules and standards the City must follow when investing the City of La Quinta's public funds. It is the policy of the City of La Quinta to invest all public funds in a manner which will provide a diversified portfolio with maximum security while meeting daily cash flow demands and the highest investment return in conformity with all State and local statutes. This Policy applies to all cash and investments of the City of La Quinta, La Quinta Redevelopment Agency and the La Quinta Financing Authority, hereafter referred to as the "City.,, The primary objectives, in order of priority, of the City of La Quinta's investment activity shall be: • Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments of the City of La Quinta shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. • The investment portfolio shall remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements that may be reasonably anticipated. • The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return or yield throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. • Within the constraints of safety, liquidity and yield, the City will endeavor to maintain a diversified portfolio by allocating assets between different types of investments within policy limitations. It is understood that all investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, by persons with prudence, discretion, and intelligence acting as they would in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, as well as considering the probable safety of their capital and the probable income to be derived. As noted in the policy, authority to manage the City of La Quinta's investment portfolio is derived from the City Ordinance. Management responsibility for the investment program is delegated to the City Treasurer, who shall establish and implement written procedures for the operation of the City's investment program consistent with the Investment Policy. The Treasurer is required to establish and implement a system of internal controls to 191 002 maintain the safety of the portfolio. The internal control system will also insure the timely preparation and accurate reporting of the portfolio financial information. As part of the annual audit of the City of La Quinta's financial statements, the independent auditor reviews the adequacy of those controls and advises the City if weaknesses are found. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving the Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2001 /2002; or 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council with changes approving the Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2001 /2002; or 3. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving the Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2001 /2002; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. submitted, Uohn M. Falcoher Finance Director/Treasurer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese City Manager Attachments: 1. Redline Copy of Proposed Investment Policy 199 003 RESOLUTION NO. 2001 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE AMENDED INVESTMENT POLICY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 WHEREAS, the general purpose of the Investment Policy is to provide the rules and standards users must follow in investing funds of the City of La Quinta; and WHEREAS, the primary objectives, in order of priority, of the City of La Quinta's investment activity shall be: Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments of the City of La Quinta shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. The investment portfolio shall remain sufficiently li ui to meet all operating requirements that may be reasonably anticipated. The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return or yield throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. WHEREAS, authority to manage the City of La Quinta's investment portfolio is derived from the City Ordinance. Management responsibility for the investment program is delegated to the City Treasurer, who shall establish and implement written procedures for the operation of the City's investment program consistent with the Investment Policy; and WHEREAS, the Investment Policy will be adopted before the end of June of each year and amended as considered necessary; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta to adopt the 2001 /2002 Fiscal Year Investment Policy (Exhibit A). 193 004 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this day of 2001 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: KATHY JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 194 005 CITY OF LA QUINTA Investment Policy Table of Contents Section Topic Page Executive Summary 2 I General Purpose 4 II Investment Policy 4 III Scope 4 IV Objectives 5 Safety Liquidity Yield Diversified Portfolio V Prudence 6 VI Delegation of Authority 6 VII Conflict of Interest 7 Vill Authorized Financial Dealers and Institutions 7 Broker/Dealers Financial Institutions IX Authorized Investments and Limitations 8 Investment Pools 12 XI Safekeeping and Custody 13 XII Interest Earning Distribution Policy 13 XIII Internal Controls and Independent Auditors 14 XIV Benchmark 15 XV Reporting Standards 15 XVI Investment of Bond Proceeds 16 XVII Investment Advisory Board - City of La Quinta 17 XVIII Investment Policy Adoption 17 Appendices: A. Summary of Authorized Investments and Limitations 18 B. Municipal Code Ordinance 2.70 - Investment Advisory Board 19 C. Municipal Code Ordinance 3.08 - Investment of Moneys and Funds 20 D. Segregation of Major Investment Responsibilities 22 E. Listing of Approved Financial Institutions 23 F. Broker/Dealer Questionnaire and Certification 24 G. Investment Pool Questionnaire 29 H. Glossary 33 1 195 City of La Quinta Investment Policy Executive Summary The general purpose of this Investment Policy is to provide the rules and standards users must follow in investing funds of the City of La Quinta. It is the policy of the City of La Quinta to invest all public funds in a manner which will provide a diversified portfolio with maximum security while meeting daily cash flow demands and the highest investment return in conformity to all state and local statutes. This Policy applies to all cash and investments of the City of La Quinta, La Quinta Redevelopment Agency and the La Quinta Financing Authority, hereafter referred in this document as the "City". The primary objectives, in order of priority, of the City of La Quinta's investment activity shall be: Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments of the City of La Quinta shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio The investment portfolio shall remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements that may be reasonably anticipated. The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return or yield throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. Within the constraints of safety, liquidity and yield, the City will endeavor to maintain a diversified portfolio by allocating assets between different types of investments within policy limitations. Investments shall be made with judgment and care - under circumstances then prevailing - which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. Authority to manage the City of La Quinta's investment portfolio is derived from the City Ordinance. Management responsibility for the investment program is delegated to the City Treasurer, who shall establish and implement written procedures for the operation of the City's investment program consistent with the Investment Policy. The Treasurer shall establish and implement a system of internal controls to maintain the safety of the portfolio. In addition, the internal control system will also insure the timely preparation and accurate reporting of the portfolio financial information. As part 2 196 of the annual audit of the City of La Quinta's financial statements the independent auditor reviews the adequacy of those controls and comments if weaknesses are found. Investment responsibilities carry added duties of insuring that investments are made without improper influence or the appearance to a reasonable person of questionable or improper influence. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy maintains a listing of financial institutions which are approved for investment purposes. All Broker/Dealers and financial institutions selected by the Treasurer to provide investment services will be approved by the City Manager subject to City Council approval. The Treasurer will be permitted to invest only in City approved investments up to the maximum allowable percentages or dollar limitations and, where applicable, through the bid process requirements. Authorized investment vehicles and related maximum portfolio positions are listed in Appendix A - Summary of Authorized Investments and Limitations. At least two bids will be required of investments in the authorized investment vehicles. Collateralization will be required for Certificates of Deposits in excess of $100,000. Collateral will always be held by an independent third party from the institution that sells the Certificates of Deposit to the City. Evidence of compliance with State Collateralization policies must be supplied to the City and retained by the City Treasurer. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy shall require that each individual investment have a maximum maturity of two years unless specific approval is authorized by the City Council. In addition, the City's investment in the State Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is allowable as long as the average maturity does not exceed two years, unless specific approval is authorized by the City Council. The City's investment in Money Market Mutual funds is allowable as long as the average maturity does not exceed 60 days. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy will use the six month U.S. Treasury Bill as a benchmark when measuring the performance of the investment portfolio. The Investment Policies shall be adopted by resolution of the La Quinta City Council on an annual basis, The Investment Policies will be adopted before the end of June of each year. This Executive Summary is an overall review of the City of La Quinta Investment Policies. Reading this summary does not constitute a complete review which can only be accomplished by reviewing all the pages. 3 197 P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLe TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 City of La Quinta Statement of Investment Policy July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002 Scheduled for Adoption by the City Council on June 19, 2001 GENERAL PURPOSE (760) 777-7000 FAX (760) 777-7101 The general purpose of this document is to provide the rules and standards users must follow in administering the City of La Quinta cash investments. 11 INVESTMENT POLICY It is the policy of the City of La Quinta to invest public funds in a manner which will provide a diversified portfolio with safety of principal as the primary objective while meeting daily cash flow demands with the highest investment return. In addition, the Investment Policy will conform to all State and local statutes governing the investment of public funds. III SCOPE This Investment Policy applies to all cash and investments of the City of La Quinta, City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency and the City of La Quinta Financing Authority, hereafter referred in this document as the "City". These funds are reported in the City of La Quinta Comprehensive Annual financial Report (CAFR) and include: All funds within the following fund types: General Special Revenue Capital Projects Debt Service Internal Service Trust and Agency Any new fund types and fund(s) that may be created. 0 10 IV OBJECTIVES The primary objective, in order of priority, of the City of La Quinta's investment activity shall be: 1. Safety Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments of the City of La Quinta shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio in accordance with the permitted investments. The objective will be to mitigate credit risk and interest rate risk. A. Credit Risk Credit Risk - is the risk of loss due to the failure of the security issuer or backer. Credit risk may be mitigated by: ► Limiting investments to the safest types of securities; ► Pre -qualifying the financial institutions, and broker/dealers, which the City of La Quinta will do business; and ► Diversifying the investment portfolio so that potential losses on individual securities will be minimized. B. Interest Rate Risk Interest Rate risk is the risk that the market value of securities in the portfolio will fall due to changes in general interest rates. Interest rate risk may be mitigated by: ► Structuring the investment portfolio so that securities mature to meet cash requirements for ongoing operations, thereby avoiding the need to sell securities on the open market prior to maturity; and ► By investing operating funds primarily in shorter -term securities. 2. Liquidity The investment portfolio shall remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements that may be reasonably anticipated. This is accomplished by structuring the portfolio so that sufficient liquid funds are available to meet anticipated demands. Furthermore since all possible cash demands cannot be anticipated the portfolio should be diversified and consist of securities with active secondary or resale markets. 199 5 3. Yield The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. Return on investment is of least importance compared to the safety and liquidity objectives described above. The core of investments are limited to relatively low risk securities in anticipation of earning a fair return relative to the risk being assumed. Securities shall not be sold prior to maturity with the following exceptions: ► A declining credit security could be sold early to minimize loss of principal; ► Liquidity needs of the portfolio require that the security be sold. 4. Diversified Portfolio Within the constraints of safety, liquidity and yield, the City will endeavor to maintain a diversified portfolio by allocating assets between different types of investments within policy limitations. V The City shall follow the Uniform Prudent Investor Act as adopted by the State of California in Probate Code Sections 16045 through 16054.. Section 16053 sets forth the terms of a prudent person which are as follows: Investments shall be made with judgment and care - under circumstances then prevailing - which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence excerise in the professional management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. VI DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY Authority to manage the City of La Quinta's investment portfolio is derived from the City Ordinance. Management responsibility for the investment program is delegated to the City Treasurer, who shall establish written procedures for the operation of the investment program consistent with the Investment Policy. Procedures should include reference to safekeeping, wire transfer agreements, banking service contracts, and collateral/depository agreements. Such procedures shall include explicit delegation of 0 200 authority to persons responsible for investment transactions. No person may engage in an investment transaction except as provided under the terms of this Investment Policy and the procedures established by the City Treasurer. The City Treasurer shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken and shall establish a system of controls to regulate the activities of subordinate officials. The City Manager or Assistant City Manager shall approve in writing all purchases and sales of investments prior to their execution by the City Treasurer. VII CONFLICT OF INTEREST Investment responsibilities carry added duties of insuring that investments are made without improper influence or the appearance of improper influence. Therefore, the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, and the City Treasurer shall adhere to the State of California Code of Economic Interest and to the following: ► The City Manager, Assistant City Manager, and the City Treasurer shall not personally or through a close relative maintain any accounts, interest, or private dealings with any firm with which the City places investments, with the exception of regular savings, checking and money market accounts, or other similar transactions that are offered on a non-negotiable basis to the general public. Such accounts shall be disclosed annually to the City Clerk in conjunction with annual disclosure statements of economic interest. ► All persons authorized to place or approve investments shall report to the City Clerk kinship relations with principal employees of firms with which the City places investments. Vill AUTHORIZED FINANCIAL DEALERS AND INSTITUTIONS The City of La Quinta Investment Policy maintains a listing of financial institutions which are approved for investment purposes. In addition a list will also be maintained of approved broker/dealers selected by credit worthiness, who maintain an office in the State of California. 1. Broker/Dealers who desire to become bidders for investment transactions must supply the City of La Quinta with the following: ► Current audited financial statements ► Proof of National Association of Security Dealers Certification ► Trading resolution ► Proof of California registration ► Resume of Financial broker ► Completion of the City of La Quinta Broker/Dealer questionnaire which 7 201 contains a certification of having read the City of La Quinta Investment Policy The City Treasurer shall evaluate the documentation submitted by the broker/dealer and independently verify existing reports on file for any firm and individual conducting investment related business. The City Treasurer will also contact the following agencies during the verification process: ► National Association of Security Dealer's Public Disclosure Report File - 1-800-289-9999 ► State of California Department of Corporations 1-916-445-3062 All Broker/Dealers selected by the City Treasurer to provide investment services will be approved by the City Manager subject to City Council approval. The City Attorney will perform a legal review of the trading resolution/investment contract submitted by each Broker/Dealer. Each securities dealer shall provide monthly and quarterly reports filed pursuant to U.S. Treasury Department regulations. Each mutual fund shall provide a prospectus and statement of additional information. 2. Financial Institutions will be required to meet the following criteria in order to receive City funds for deposit or investment: A. Insurance - Public Funds shall be deposited only in financial institutions having accounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) B. Collateral - The amount of City of La Quinta deposits or investments not insured by the FDIC -shall be 110% collateralized by securities' or 150% mortgages' market values of that amount of invested funds plus unpaid interest earnings. C. Disclosure - Each financial institution maintaining invested funds in excess of the FDIC insured amount shall furnish the City a copy of the most recent Annual Call Report. The City shall not invest in excess of the FDIC insured amount in banking institutions which do not disclose to the city a current listing of securities pledged for collateralization in public monies. 0 202 IX AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS AND LIMITATIONS The City Treasurer will be permitted to invest in the investments summarized in the Appendix A. I. STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND CITY OF LA QUINTA LIMITATIONS As provided in Sections 16429.1, 53601, 53601.1, and 53649 of the Government Code, the State of California limits the investment vehicles available to local agencies as summarized in the following paragraphs. Section 53601, as now amended, provides that unless Section 53601 specifies a limitation on an investment's maturity, no investments with maturities exceeding five years shall be made. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy has specified that no investment may exceed two years. State Treasurer's Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) - As authorized in Government Code Section 16429.1 and by LAIF procedures, local government agencies are each authorized to invest a maximum of $30 million per account in this investment program administered by the California State Treasurer. The City's investment in the State Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is allowable as long as the average maturity of its investment portfolio does not exceed two years, unless specific approval is authorized by the City Council. The City of La Quinta has two accounts with LAIF. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy has a limitation of 4&% 20% of the portfolio. U.S. Government and Related Issues - As authorized in Government Code Sections 53601 (a) through (n) as they pertain to surplus funds, this category includes a wide variety of government securities which include the following: • Local government bonds or other indebtedness and State bonds or other indebtedness. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investments in local and state indebtedness • U.S. Treasury bills, notes and bonds and Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA)securities directly issued and backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy limits investments in U.S. Treasury issues and GNMA to 100% 7559A of the portfolio. • U.S. Government instrumentalities and agencies issuing securities not P 203 backed as to principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. The Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB), Federal Land Bank (FLB) and Federal Intermediate Credit Bank (FICB) are such issuers. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy has a limitation of $3 million per issuer. • Federal government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) issuing securities not backed as to principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. These GSEs include Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) and Student Loan Marketing Association (SLMA) which are publicly owned. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy has a limitation of $5 million for FNMA, $5 million for FHLMC , and $3 million for SLMA. ° Bankers' Acceptances - As authorized in Government Code Section 53601 (f), 40% of the portfolio may be invested in Bankers' Acceptances, although no more than 30% of the portfolio may be invested in Bankers' Acceptances with any one commercial bank. Additionally, the maturity period cannot exceed 2-7-8 180 days; The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investment in Bankers' Acceptances. Commercial Paper - As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(g), 15% of the portfolio may be invested in commercial paper of the highest rating (A-1 or P-1) as rated by Moody's or Standard and Poor's, with maturities not to exceed 440 270 days. This percentage may be increased to 30% if the dollar weighted average maturity does not exceed 31 days. There are a number of other qualifications regarding investments in commercial paper based on the financial strength of the corporation and the size of the investment. The City of La Quinta's Investment Policy follows The Government Code with the following additional limitations: (1) maximum maturity per issue of 90 days and a (2) maximum of $2 million per issuer. Negotiable Certificates of Deposit - As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(h), 30% of the portfolio may be invested in negotiable certificates of deposit issued by commercial banks and savings and loan associations. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investment in Negotiable Certificates of Deposit. Repurchase and Reverse Repurchase Agreements - As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(i), these investment vehicles are agreements between the local agency and seller for the purchase of government securities to be resold 10 204 at a specific date and for a specific amount. Repurchase agreements are generally used for short term investments varying from one day to two weeks. There is no legal limitation on the amount of the repurchase agreement. However, the maturity period cannot exceed one year. The market value of securities underlying a repurchase agreement shall be at least 102% of the funds invested and shall be valued at least quarterly. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investment in Repurchase Agreements. The term "reverse repurchase agreement" means the sale of securities by the local agency pursuant to an agreement by which the local agency will repurchase such securities on or before a specific date and for a specific amount. As provided in Government Code Section 53635, reverse repurchase agreements require the prior approval of the City Council. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investment in Reverse Repurchase Agreements. Corporate Notes - As authorized in Government Code Section 53601 (j), local agencies may invest in corporate notes for a maximum period of five years in an amount not to exceed 30% of the agency's portfolio. The notes must be issued by corporations organized and operating in the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any other state and operating in the United States. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investment in corporate notes. Diversified Management Companies - As authorized in Government Code Section 53601 (k1, local agencies are authorized to invest in shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies (mutual funds) in an amount not to exceed 20% of the agency's portfolio. There are a number of other qualifications and restrictions regarding allowable investments in corporate notes and shares of beneficial interest issued by mutual funds which include (1) attaining the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided by not less than two of the three largest nationally recognized rating services, or (2) having an investment advisor registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years' experience investing in the securities and obligations and with assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). The City of La Quinta Investment Policy only allows investments in mutual funds that are money market funds maintaining a par value of $1 per share that invests in direct issues of the U.S. Treasury and/or US Agency Securities with an average maturity of their portfolio not exceeding 90 days and the City limits such investments to 20% of the portfolio. Mortgage -Backed Securities - As authorized in Government code Section 53601(n), local agencies may invest in mortgage -backed securities such as 11 205 mortgage pass -through securities and collateralized mortgage obligations for a maximum period of five years in an amount not to exceed 20% of the agency's portfolio. Securities eligible for investment shall have a "A" or higher rating. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investment in Mortgage - Backed Securities. Financial Futures and Financial Option Contracts - As authorized in Government Code Section 53601.1, local agencies may invest in financial futures or option contracts in any of the above investment categories subject to the same overall portfolio limitations. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investments in financial futures and financial option contracts. Certificates of Deposit - As authorized in Government Code Section 53649, Certificates of Deposit are fixed term investments which are required to be collateralized from 1 10% to 150% depending on the specific security pledged as collateral in accordance with Government Code Section 53652. There are no portfolio limits on the amount or maturity for this investment vehicle. Collateralization will be required for Certificates of Deposits in excess of the FDIC insured amount. The type of collateral is limited to City authorized investments. Collateral will always be held by an independent third party from the institution that sells the Certificates of Deposit to the City. Evidence of compliance with State Coll ateralization policies must be supplied to the City and retained by the City Treasurer as follows: 1. Certificates of Deposits Insured by the FDIC. The City Treasurer may waive collateral ization of a deposit that is federally insured. 2. Certificates of Deposit in excess of FDIC Limits. The amount not federally insured shall be 1 10% collateralized securities or 150% mortgages market value of that amount of invested funds plus unpaid interest earnings. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy limits the percentage of Certificates of Deposit to 60% of the portfolio. Sweep Accounts - As authorized by the City Council, a U.S. Treasury and/or U.S. Agency Securities Money Market Sweep Account with a $50,000 target balance may be maintained in conjunction with the checking account. Derivatives - The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investment in derivatives. 12 206 X INVESTMENT POOLS There are three (3) types of investment pools: 1) state -run pools, 2) pools that are operated by a political subdivision where allowed by law and the political subdivision is the trustee i.e. County Pool; and 3) pools that are operated for profit by third parties. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy has authorized investment with the State of California's Treasurers Office Local Agency Investment Fund commonly referred to as LAIF. LAIF was organized in 1977 through State Legislation Section 16429.1, 2 and 3. Each LAIF account is restricted to a maximum investable limit of $30 million. In addition, LAIF will provide quarterly market value information to the City of La Quinta. On an annual basis the City Treasurer will submit the Investment Pool Questionnaire to LAIF. Also, prior to opening any new Investment Pool account, which would require City Council approval, the City Treasurer will require the completion of the Investment Pool Questionnaire. The City does not allow investments with any other Investment Pool - County Pools or Third Party Pools. XI SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY All security transactions of the City of La Quinta Investment Policy shall be conducted on a delivery - versus - payment (DVP) basis. Securities will be held by a third party custodian designated by the City Treasurer and evidenced by safekeeping receipts. Deposits and withdrawals of money market mutual funds and LAIF shall be made directly to the entity and not to an investment advisor, broker or dealer. Money market mutual funds and LAIF shall also operate on a DVP basis to be considered for investment. XII INTEREST EARNING DISTRIBUTION POLICY Interest earnings is generated from pooled investments and specific investments. 1. Pooled Investments - It is the general policy of the City to pool all available operating cash of the City of La Quinta, La Quinta Redevelopment Agency and La Quinta Financing Authority and allocate interest earnings, in the following order, as follows: A. Payment to the General Fund of an amount equal to the total annual bank service charges as incurred by the general fund for all operating funds as included in the annual operating budget. 13 207 B. Payment to the General Fund of a management fee equal to 5% of the annual pooled cash fund investment earnings. C. Payment to each fund of an amount based on the average computerized daily cash balance included in the common portfolio for the earning period. 2. Specific Investments - Specific investments purchased by a fund shall incur all earnings and expenses to that particular fund. XIII INTERNAL CONTROLS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITOR The City Treasurer shall establish a system of internal controls to accomplish the following objectives: Safeguard assets; The orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to management policies; Prevention or detection of errors and fraud; The accuracy and completeness of accounting records; and, Timely preparation of reliable financial information. While no internal control system, however elaborate, can guarantee absolute assurance that the City's assets are safeguarded, it is the intent of the City's internal control to provide a reasonable assurance that management of the investment function meets the City's objectives. The internal controls shall address the following: a. Control of collusion. Collusion is a situation where two or more employees are working in conjunction to defraud their employer. b. Separation of transaction authority from accounting and record keeping. By separating the person who authorizes or performs the transaction from the people who record or otherwise account for the transaction, a separation of duties is achieved. C. Custodial safekeeping. Securities purchased from any bank or dealer including appropriate collateral (as defined by State Law) shall be placed with an independent third party for custodial safekeeping. d. Avoidance of physical delivery securities. Book entry securities are much easier to transfer and account for since actual delivery of a document never takes 14 M place. Delivered securities must be properly safeguarded against loss or destruction. The potential for fraud and loss increases with physically delivered securities. e. Clear delegation of authority to subordinate staff members. Subordinate staff members must have a clear understanding of their authority and responsibilities to avoid improper actions. Clear delegation of authority also preserves the internal control structure that is contingent on the various staff positions and their respective responsibilities as outlined in the Segregation of Major Investment Responsibilities appendices. f. Written confirmation or telephone transactions for investments and wire transfers. Due to the potential for error and improprieties arising from telephone transactions, all telephone transactions shall be supported by written. communications and approved by the appropriate person. Written communications may be via fax if on letterhead and the safekeeping institution has a list of authorized signatures. Fax correspondence must be supported by evidence of verbal or written follow-up. g. Development of a wire transfer agreement with the City's bank and third party custodian. This agreement should outline the various controls, security provisions, and delineate responsibilities of each party making and receiving wire transfers. The System of Internal Controls developed by the City, shall be reviewed annually by the independent auditor in connection with the annual audit of the City of La Quinta's Financial Statements. The independent auditor's management letter comments pertaining to cash and investments, if any, shall be directed to the City Manager who will direct the City Treasurer to provide a written response to the independent auditor's letter. The management letter comments pertaining to cash and investment activities and the City Treasurer's response shall be provided to the City's Investment Advisory Board for their consideration. Following the completion of each annual audit, the independent auditor shall meet with the Investment Advisory Board and discuss the auditing procedures performed and the review of internal controls for cash and investment activities. XIV BENCHMARK The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of obtaining a rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles commensurate with the investment risk constraints and the cash flow needs of the City. Return on investment is of least importance compared to safety and liquidity objectives. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy will use the six month U.S. Treasury Bill as 15 209 a benchmark when measuring the performance of the investment portfolio. XV REPORTING STANDARDS SB564 section 3 requires a quarterly report to the Legislative Body of Investment activities. The City of La Quinta Investment Advisory Board has elected to report the investment activities to the City Council on a monthly basis through the Treasurers Report. AB 943 requires that the December 31" and June 30' Treasurers Reports be sent to the California Debt and Advisory Commission within sixty days of the end of the quarter. The City Treasurer shall submit a monthly Treasurers Report to the City Council and the Investment Advisory Board that includes all cash and investments under the authority of the Treasurer. The Treasurers Report shall summarize cash and investment activity and changes in balances and include the following: ► A certification by City Treasurer; ► A listing of Purchases and sales/maturities of investments; ► Cash and Investments categorized by authorized investments, except for LAIF which will be provided quarterly and show yield and maturity; ► Comparison of month end actual holdings to Investment Policy limitations; ► Current year and prior year monthly history of cash and investments for trend analysis; ► Balance Sheet; ► Distribution of cash and investment balances by fund; ► A comparison of actual and surplus funds; ► A year to date historical cash flow analysis and projection for the next six months. XVI INVESTMENT OF BOND PROCEEDS The City's Investment Policy shall govern bond proceeds and bond reserve fund investments. California Code Section 5922 (d) governs the investment of bond proceeds and reserve funds in accordance with bond indenture provisions which shall be structured in accordance with the City's Investment Policy. Arbitrage Requirement The US Tax Reform Act of 1986 requires the City to perform arbitrage calculations as required and return excess earnings to the US Treasury from investments of proceeds of bond issues sold after the effective date of this law. This arbitrage calculations may 16 210 be contracted with an outside source to provide the necessary technical assistance to comply with this regulation. Investable funds subject to the 1986 Tax Reform Act will be kept segregated from other funds and records will be kept in a fashion to facilitate the calculations. The City's investment position relative to the new arbitrage restrictions is to continue pursuing the maximum yield on applicable investments while ensuring the safety of capital and liquidity. It is the City's position to continue maximization of yield and to rebate excess earnings, if necessary. XVII INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD - CITY OF LA QUINTA The Investment Advisory Board (IAB) consists of seven members of the community that have been appointed by and report to the City Council. The IAB usually_meets on a monthly basis, but at least quarterly to (1) review at least annually the City's Investment Policy and recommend appropriate changes; (2) review monthly Treasury Report and note compliance with the Investment Policy and adequacy of cash and investments for anticipated obligations; (3) receive and consider other reports provided by the City Treasurer; (4) meet with the independent auditor after completion of the annual audit of the City's financial statements, and receive and consider the auditor's comments on auditing procedures, internal controls and findings for cash and investment activities, and; (5) serve as a resource for the City Treasurer on matters such as proposed investments, internal controls, use or change of financial institutions, custodians, brokers and dealers. The appendices include City of La Quinta Ordinance 2.70 entitled Investment Advisory Board Provisions. XVIII INVESTMENT POLICY ADOPTION On an annual basis, the Investment policies will be initially reviewed by the Investment Advisory Board and the City Treasurer. The Investment Advisory Board will forward the Investment policies, with any revisions, to the City Manager and City Attorney for their review and comment. A joint meeting will be held with the Investment Advisory Board, City Manager, City Attorney, and City Treasurer to review the Investment policies and comments, prior to submission to the City Council for their consideration. The Investment Policies shall be adopted by resolution of the City of La Quinta City Council on an annual basis. The Investment Policies will be adopted before the end of June of each year. AB 943 requires that the Investment Policies be sent to the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission within sixty days of a change to the Investment Policy. 17 211 Appendix A E 6 w ggE" -a.; e is U O LL < w N p^ a'c E Ea C C ^ C ^ ± 4 C 4 S i •� `c c - E E �O yy 33p E w 4 Y E 33 0 0 �y ya O Ybu O hY8 8 yb8 6 yh d .. E Y �o ? 2 ? p8 58� 5� 5Q� QQ 7Q5 2p5_ » 3 E S 2 �S � n a 5225 pE 5225 ai58 » wa_ a a°v�� 3 F yak 0 2S.E YI 11 m N VI p a N xE w L y S ^8 $• b a' `•C xc E➢`- � oa (YE a x a c E YY ti Ei..m Ui9 g•y�; €�+ ? pp N LL�gyMAUy T • pY $� e LL $$Yet �' .e 8 � pEpuEzi9u__ia E i ��u u o U LL LL LL E V j LL LL LL ? E a` G q mC4X 4 m 2 E E E kk L E L 9 E�Es E�gA m $ < E F E S s as $ F E E c on ° g} Y E Er n � s E$ Y p qc i F E 6 77tt yy gg j E C E _ F e_ a �s 8 E• '� •"O E^ Y m s ; E$��4 Ey9�e 2-! Pge"8 `la . -a S E E5€atst E aYgY a E E E 8- a. Fo O 303 e� .2^ag r 212 Appendix B Chapter 2.70 INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD PROVISIONS Sections: 2.70.010 General Rules Regarding Appointment. 2.70.020 Board meetings. 2.70.030 Board functions. 2.70.010 General rules regarding appointment A. Except as set out below, see Chapter 2.06 for General Provisions. B. The Investment Advisory Board (the "board") is a standing board composed of seven (7) members from the public that are appointed by city council. La Quinta residency is preferred, but not a requirement for board members. Recruitment for members may be advertised outside of the city". C. Background in the investment field and/or related experience is preferred. Background information will be required and potential candidates must agree to a background check and verification. D. On an annual basis, in conjunction with the Political Reform Act disclosure statutes, or at any time if a change in circumstances warrants, each board member will provide the City Council with a disclosure statement which identifies any matters that have a bearing on the appropriateness of that member's service on the board. Such matters may include, but are not limited to, changes in employment, changes in residence, or changes in clients. 2.70.020Board meetings. The Board usually will meet monthly, but this schedule may be extended to quarterly meetings upon the concurrence of the Board and the City Council. The specific meeting dates will be determined by the Board Members and meetings may be called for on an as needed basis. 2.70.030Board functions. 1. The principal functions of the Board are: (1) review at least annually the City's Investment Policy and recommend appropriate changes; (2) review monthly Treasury Report and note compliance with the Investment Policy and adequacy of cash and investments for anticipated obligations; (3) receive and consider other reports provided by the City Treasurer; (4) meet with the independent auditor after completion of the annual audit of the City's financial statements, and receive and consider the auditor's comments on auditing procedures, internal controls, and findings for cash and investment activities, and; (5) serve as a resource for the City Treasurer on matters such as proposed investments, internal controls, use or change of financial institutions, custodians, brokers and dealers. 2. The Board will report to the City Council after each meeting either in person or through correspondence at a regular City Council meeting. 19 213 Appendix C Chapter 3.08 INVESTMENT OF MONEYS AND FUNDS Sections: 3.08.010 Investment of city moneys and deposit of securities. 3.08.020 Authorized investments. 3.08.030 Sales of securities. 3.08.040 City bonds. 3.08.050 Reports. 3.08.060 Deposits of securities. 3.08.070 Trust fund administration. 3.08.010 Investment of city moneys and deposit of securities. Pursuant to, and in accordance with, and to the extent allowed by, Sections 53607 and 53608 of the Government Code, the authority to invest and reinvest moneys of the city, to sell or exchange securities, and to deposit them and provide for their safekeeping, is delegated to the city treasurer. (Ord. 2 § 1 (part), 1982) 3.08.020 Authorized investments. Pursuant to the delegation of authority in Section 3.08.010, the city treasurer is authorized to purchase, at their original sale or after they have been issued, securities which are permissible investments under any provision of state law relating to the investing of general city funds, including but not limited to Sections 53601 and 53635 of the Government Code, as said sections now read or may hereafter be amended, from moneys in his custody which are not required for the immediate necessities of the city and as he may deem wise and expedient, and to sell or exchange for other eligible securities and reinvest the proceeds of the securities so purchased. (Ord. 2 § 1 (part), 1982) 3.08.030 Sales of Securities. From time to time the city treasurer shall sell the securities in which city moneys have been invested pursuant to this chapter, so that the proceeds may, as appropriate, be applied to the purchase for which the original purchase money may have been designated or placed in the city treasury. (Ord. 2 § I (part), 3.08.040 City bonds. Bonds issued by the city and purchased pursuant to this chapter may be canceled either in satisfaction of sinking fund obligations or otherwise if proper and appropriate; provided, however, that the bonds may be held uncancelled and while so held may be resold. (Ord. 2 § 1 (part), 1982) 20 214 3.08.050 Reports. The city treasurer shall make a monthly report to the city council of all investments made pursuant to the authority delegated in this chapter. (Ord. 2 § 1 (part), 1982) 3.08.060 Deposits of securities. Pursuant to the delegation of authority in Section 3.08.010, the city treasurer is authorized to deposit for safekeeping, the securities in which city moneys have been invested pursuant to this chapter, in any institution or depository authorized by the terms of any state law, including but not limited to Section 53608 of the Government Code as it now reads or may hereafter be amended. In accordance with said section, the city treasurer shall take from the institution or depository a receipt for the securities so deposited and shall not be responsible for the securities delivered to and receipted for by the institution or depository until they are withdrawn therefrom by the city treasurer. (Ord. 2 § 1 (part), 1982 3.08.070 Trust fund administration. Any departmental trust fund established by the city council pursuant to Section 36523 of the Government Code shall be administered by the city treasurer in accordance with Section 36523 and 26524 of the Government code and any other applicable provisions of law. (Ord. 2 § 1 (part), 1982) 21 215 Appendix D SEGREGATION OF MAJOR INVESTMENT RESPONSIBILITIES Function Responsibilities Develop formal Investment Policy City Treasurer Recommend modifications to Investment Policy Investment Advisory Board Review formal Investment Policy and recommend City Manager and City Council action City Attorney Adopt formal Investment Policy City Council Review Financial Institutions & Select Investments City Treasurer Approve investments City Manager or Assistant City Manager Execute investment transactions City Treasurer Confirm wires, if applicable City Manager or Accounting Manager Record investment transactions in City's accounting records Accounting Manager Investment verification - match broker confirmation to City investment records Account Technician Reconcile investment records - to accounting records and bank statements - to Treasurers Report of investments Account Technician Security of investments at City Vault Security of investments Outside City Third Party Custodian Review internal control procedures External Auditor 22 216 Appendix E LISTING OF APPROVED FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS 1. Banking Services Wells Fargo Bank, Government Services, Los Angeles, California 2. Custodian Services Bank of New York, Los Angeles, California 3. Deferred Compensation International City/County Management Association Retirement Corporation 4. Broker/Dealer Services Merrill Lynch, Indian Wells, CA Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Los Angeles, California Salomon Smith Barney, Newport Beach, CA 5. Government Pool State of California Local Agency Investment Fund City of La Quinta Account La Quinta Redevelopment Agency 6. Bond Trustees 1991 City Hall Revenue Bonds - US Bank 1991 RDA Project Area 1 - US Bank 1992 RDA Project Area 2 - US Bank 1994 RDA Project Area 1 - US Bank 1995 RDA Project Area 1 & 2 - US Bank Assessment Districts - US Bank No Changes to this listing may be made without City Council 23 217 Appendix F BROKER/DEALER QUESTIONNAIRE AND CERTIFICATION 1. Name of Firm: 2. Address: 3. Telephone: (_) 4. Broker's Representative to the City (attach resume): Name: Title: Telephone: (_) 5. Manager/Partner-in-charge (attach resume): Name: Title: Telephone: 6. List all personnel who will be trading with or quoting securities to City employees (attach resume) Name: Title: Telephone: (_► (_) 7. Which of the above personnel have read the City's Investment Policy? 8. Which instruments are offered regularly by your local office? (Must equal 100%) % U.S. Treasuries % BA's % Commercial Paper % CD's % Mutual Funds % Agencies (specify): • Repos • Reverse Repos % CMO's % Derivatives % Stocks/Equities • Other (specify): 24 218 9. References -- Please identify your most directly comparable public sector clients in our geographical area. Entity Contact Telephone ( ) Client Since Entity Contact Telephone Client Since 10. Have any of your clients ever sustained a loss on a securities transaction arising from a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of the risk characteristics of the instrument? If so, explain. 11. Has your firm or your local office ever been subject to a regulatory or state/ federal agency investigation for alleged improper, fraudulent, disreputable or unfair activities related to the sale of securities? Have any of your employees been so investigated? If so, explain. 12. Has a client ever claimed in writing that you were responsible for an investment loss? Yes No If yes, please provide action taken Has a client ever claimed in writing that your firm was responsible for an investment loss? Yes No If yes, please provide action taken 25 219 Do you have any current, or pending complaints that are unreported to the NASD? Yes No If yes, please provide action taken Does your firm have any current, or pending complaints that are unreported to the NASD? Yes No If yes, please provide action taken 13. Explain your clearing and safekeeping procedures, custody and delivery process. Who audits these fiduciary responsibilities? Latest Audit Report 14. How many and what percentage of your transactions failed. Last month? % $ Last year? % $ 15. Describe the method your firm would use to establish capital trading limits for the City of La Quinta. 16. Is your firm a member in the S.I.P.C. insurance program. Yes No If yes, explain primary and excess coverage and carriers. 17. What portfolio information, if any, do you require from your clients? 18. What reports and transaction confirmations or any other research publications will the City receive? 26 220 19. Does your firm offer investment training to your clients? Yes No 20. Does your firm have professional liability insurance. Yes No If yes, please provide the insurance carrier, limits and expiration date. 21. Please list your NASD Registration Number 22. Do you have any relatives who work at the City of La Quinta? Yes No If yes, Name and Department 23. Do you maintain an office in California. Yes No 24. Do you maintain an office in La Quinta or Riverside County? Yes No 25. Please enclose the following: • Latest audited financial statements. • Samples of reports, transaction confirmations and any other research/publications the City will receive. • Samples of research reports and/or publications that your firm regularly provides to clients. • Complete schedule of fees and charges for various transactions. `CERTIFICATION' *CERTIFICATION' I hereby certify that I have personally read the Statement of Investment Policy of the City of La Quinta, and have implemented reasonable procedures and a system of controls designed to preclude imprudent investment activities arising out of transactions conducted between our firm and the City of La Quinta. All sales personnel will be routinely informed of the City's investment objectives, horizons, outlooks, strategies and risk constraints whenever we are so advised by the City. We pledge to exercise due diligence in informing the City of La Quinta of all foreseeable risks associated with financial transactions conducted with our firm. By signing this document the City of La Quinta is authorized to conduct any and all background checks. Under penalties of perjury, the responses to this questionnaire are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. 27 221 Broker Representative Date Title Sales Manager and/or Managing Partner' Date Title 28 222 Appendix G INVESTMENT POOL QUESTIONNAIRE Note: This Investment Pool Questionnaire was developed by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA)• Prior to entering a pool, the following questions and issues should be considered. SECURITIES Government pools may invest in a broader range of securities than your entity invests in. It is important that you are aware of, and are comfortable with, the securities the pool buys. 1. Does the pool provide a written statement of Investment Policy and objectives? 2. Does the statement contain: a. A description of eligible investment instruments? b. The credit standards for investments? c. The allowable maturity range of investments? d. The maximum allowable dollar weighted average portfolio maturity? e. The limits of portfolio concentration permitted for each type of security? f. The policy on reverse repurchase agreements, options, short sales and futures? 3. Are changes in the policies communicated to the pool participants? 4. Does the pool contain only the types of securities that are permitted by your Investment Policy? INTEREST Interest is not reported in a standard format, so it is important that you know how interest is quoted,, calculated and distributed so that you can make comparisons with other investment alternatives. Interest Calculations 1. Does the pool disclose the following about yield calculations: a. The methodology used to calculate interest? (Simple maturity, yield to maturity, etc.) b. The frequency of interest payments? c. How interest is paid? (Credited to principal at the end of the month, each quarter; mailed?) d. How are gains/losses reported? Factored monthly or only when realized? 29 223 REPORTING 1. Is the yield reported to participants of the pool monthly? (If not, how often?) 2. Are expenses of the pool deducted before quoting the yield? 3. Is the yield generally in line with the market yields for securities in which you usually invest? 4. How often does the pool report, and does that report include the market value of securities? SECURITY The following questions are designed to help you safeguard your funds from loss of principal and loss of market value. 1. Does the pool disclose safekeeping practices? 2. Is the pool subject to audit by an independent auditor? 3. Is a copy of the audit report available to participants? 4. Who makes the portfolio decisions? 5. How does the manager monitor the credit risk of the securities in the pool? 6. Is the pool monitored by someone on the board of a separate neutral party external to the investment function to ensure compliance with written policies? 7. Does the pool have specific policies with regards to the various investment vehicles? a. What are the different investment alternatives? b. What are the policies for each type of investment? 8. Does the pool mark the portfolio to its market value? 9. Does the pool disclose the following about how portfolio securities are valued: a. The frequency with which the portfolio securities are valued? b. The method used to value the portfolio (cost, current value, or some other method)? 30 22,E OPERATIONS The answers to these questions will help you determine whether this pool meets your operational requirements: 1. Does the pool limit eligible participants? 2. What entities are permitted to invest in the pool? 3. Does the pool allow multiple accounts and sub -accounts? 4. Is there a minimum or maximum account size? 5. Does the pool limit the number of transactions each month? What is the number of transactions permitted each month? 6. Is there a limit on transaction amounts for withdrawals and deposits? a. What is the minimum and maximum withdrawal amount permitted? b. What is the minimum and maximum deposit amount permitted? 7. How much notice is required for withdrawals/deposits? 8. What is the cutoff time for deposits and withdrawals? 9. Can withdrawals be denied? 10. Are the funds 100% withdrawable at anytime? 11. What are the procedures for making deposits and withdrawals? a. What is the paperwork required, if any? b. What is the wiring process? 12. Can an account remain open with a zero balance? 13. Are confirmations sent following each transaction? STATEMENTS It is important for you and the agency's trustee (when applicable), to receive statements monthly so the pool's records of your activity and holding are reconciled by you and your trustee. 31 225 1. Are statements for each account sent to participants? a. What are the fees? b. How often are they passed? c. How are they paid? d. Are there additional fees for wiring funds (what is the fee)? 2. Are expenses deducted before quoting the yield? QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER FOR BOND PROCEEDS It is important to know (1) whether the pool accepts bond proceeds and (2) whether the pool qualifies with the U.S. Department of the Treasury as an acceptable commingled fund for arbitrage purposes. 1. Does the pool accept bond proceeds subject to arbitrage rebate? 2. Does the pool provide accounting and investment records suitable for proceeds of bond issuance subject to arbitrage rebate? 3. Will the yield calculation reported by the pool be acceptable to the IRS or will it have to be recalculated? 4. Will the pool accept transaction instructions from a trustee? 5. Are you allowed to have separate accounts for each bond issue so that you do not commingle the interest earnings of funds subject to rebate with funds not subject to regulations? 32 226 Appendix H GLOSSARY (Adopted from the Municipal Treasurers Association) The purpose of this glossary is to provide the reader of the City of La Quinta investment policies with a better understanding of financial terms used in municipal investing. AGENCIES: Federal agency securities and/or Government -sponsored enterprises. ASKED: The price at which securities are offered. BANKERS' ACCEPTANCE IBM: A draft or bill of exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill, as well as the issuer. BID: The price offered by a buyer of securities. (When you are selling securities, you ask for a bid.) See Offer. BROKER: A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a commission. CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT (CD): A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a certificate. Large -denomination CD's are typically negotiable. COLLATERAL: Securities, evidence of deposit or other property which a borrower pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposits of public monies. COMMERCIAL PAPER: Short-term unsecured promissory notes issued by a corporation to raise working capital. These negotiable instruments are purchased at a discount to par value or at par value with interest bearing. Commercial paper is issued by corporations such as General Motors Acceptance Corporation, IBM, Bank America, etc. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFRI: The official annual report for the City of La Quinta. It includes five combined statements for each individual fund and account group prepared in conformity with GAAP. It also includes supporting schedules necessary to demonstrate compliance with finance -related legal and contractual provisions, extensive introductory material, and a detailed Statistical Section. COUPON: (a) The annual rate of interest that a bond's issuer promises to pay the bondholder on the bond's face value. (b) A certificate attached to a bond evidencing interest due on a payment date. DEALER: A dealer, as opposed to a broker, acts as a principal in all transactions, buying and selling for his own account. DEBENTURE: A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer. DELIVERY VERSUS PAYMENT: There are two methods of delivery of securities: delivery versus payment and delivery versus receipt. Delivery versus payment is delivery of securities with an exchange of money for the securities. Delivery versus receipt is delivery of securities with an exchange of a signed receipt for the securities. DERIVATIVES: (1) Financial instruments whose return profile is linked to, or derived from, the movement of one or more underlying index or security, and may include a leveraging factor, or (2) financial contracts based upon notional amounts whose value is derived from an underlying index or security (interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equities or commodities). 33 227 DISCOUNT: The difference between the cost price of a security and its maturity when quoted at lower than face value. A security selling below original offering price shortly after sale also is considered to be at a discount. 3 DISCOUNT SECURITIES: Non -interest bearing money market instruments that are issued a discount and redeemed at maturity for full face value, e.g., U.S. Treasury Bills. DIVERSIFICATION: Dividing investment funds among a variety of securities offering independent returns. FEDERAL CREDIT AGENCIES: Agencies of the Federal government set up to supply credit to various classes of institutions and individuals, e.g., S&L's, small business firms, students, farmers, farm cooperatives, and exporters. 1. FNMAs (Federal National Mortgage Association) - Used to assist the home mortgage market by purchasing mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration and the Farmers Home Administration, as well as those guaranteed by the Veterans Administration. They are issued in various maturities and in minimum denominations of $10,000. Principal and Interest is paid monthly. 2. FHLBs (Federal Home Loan Bank Notes and Bonds) - Issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank System to help finance the housing industry. The notes and bonds provide liquidity and home mortgage credit to savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, cooperative banks, insurance companies, and mortgage -lending institutions. They are issued irregularly for various maturities. The minimum denomination is $5,000. The notes are issued with maturities of less than one year and interest is paid at maturity. The Other federal agency issues are Small Business Administration notes (SBAs), Government National Mortgage Association bonds are issued with various maturities and carry semi-annual coupons. Interest is calculated on a 360-day, 30-day month basis. FLBs (Federal Land Bank Bonds) - Long-term mortgage credit provided to farmers by Federal Land Banks. These bonds are issued at irregular times for various maturities ranging from a few months to ten years. The minimum denomination is $1,000. They carry semi-annual coupons. Interest is calculated on a 360-day, 30 day month basis. 4. FFCBs (Federal Farm Credit Bank) - Debt instruments used to finance the short and intermediate term needs of farmers and the national agricultural industry. They are issued monthly with three- and six-month maturities. The FFCB issues larger issues (one to ten year) on a periodic basis. These issues are highly liquid. 5. FICBs (Federal Intermediate Credit bank Debentures) - Loans to lending institutions used to finance the short-term and intermediate needs of farmers, such as seasonal production. They are usually issued monthly in minimum denominations of $3,000 with a nine -month maturity. Interest is payable at maturity and is calculated on a 360- day, 30-day month basis. 6. FHLMCs (Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation) - a government sponsored entity established in 1970 to provide a secondary market for conventional home mortgages. Mortgages are purchased solely from the Federal Home Loan Bank System member lending institutions whose deposits are insured by agencies of the United States Government. They are issued for various maturities and in minimum denominations of $10,000. Principal and Interest is paid monthly. 34 228 notes (GNMAs), Tennessee Valley Authority notes (TVAs), and Student Loan Association notes (SALLIE-MAEs). FEDERAL DEPOSITOR INSURANCE CORPORATION (FDIC): A federal agency that insures bank deposits, currently up to $100,000 per deposit. FEDERAL FUNDS RATE: The rate of interest at which Fed funds are traded. This rate is currently pegged by the Federal Reserve through open - market operations. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS (FHLB): Government sponsored wholesale banks (currently 12 regional banks) which lend funds and provide correspondent banking services to member commercial banks, thrift institutions, credit unions and insurance companies. The mission of the FHLBs is to liquefy the housing related assets of its members who must purchase stock in their district Bank. FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE (FOMC): Consists of seven members of the Federal Reserve Board and five of the twelve Federal Reserve Bank Presidents. The President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is a permanent member, while the other Presidents serve on a rotating basis. The Committee periodically meets to set Federal Reserve guidelines regarding purchases and sales of Government Securities in the open market as a means of influencing the volume of bank credit and money. FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM: the central bank of the United States created by Congress and consisting of a seven member Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., 12 regional banks and about 5,700 commercial banks that are members of the system. 35 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (GNMA or Ginnie Mae): Securities influencing the volume of bank credit guaranteed by GNMA and issued by mortgage bankers, commercial banks, savings and loan associations, and other institutions. Security holder is protected by full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Ginnie Mae securities are backed by the FHA, VA or FMHM mortgages. The term "passthroughs" is often used to describe Ginnie Maes. LAIF (Local Agency Investment Fund) - A special fund in the State Treasury which local agencies may use to deposit funds for investment. There is no minimum investment period and the minimum transaction is $5,000, in multiples of $1,000 above that, with a maximum balance of $30,000,000 for any agency. The City is restricted to a maximum of ten transactions per month. It offers high liquidity because deposits can be converted to cash in 24 hours and no interest is lost. All interest is distributed to those agencies participating on a proportionate share basis determined by the amounts deposited and the length of time they are deposited. Interest is paid quarterly. The State retains an amount for reasonable costs of making the investments, not to exceed one -quarter of one percent of the earnings. LIQUIDITY: A liquid asset is one that can be converted easily and rapidly into cash without a substantial loss of value. In the money market, a security is said to be liquid if the spread between bid and asked prices is narrow and reasonable size can be done at those quotes. LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL (LGIP): The aggregate of all funds from political subdivisions that are placed in the custody of the State Treasurer for investment and reinvestment. MARKET VALUE: The price at which a security is trading and could presumably be purchased or sold. 229 MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT: A written contract covering all future transactions between the parties to repurchase --reverse repurchase agreements that establishes each party's rights in the transactions. A master agreement will often specify, among other things, the right of the buyer -lender to liquidate the underlying securities in the vent of default by the seller -borrower. MATURITY: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable MONEY MARKET: The market in which short- term debt instruments (bills, commercial paper, banders' acceptances, etc.) are issued and traded. OFFER: The price asked by a seller of securities. (When you are buying securities, you ask for an offer.) See Asked and Bid. OPEN MARKET OPERATIONS: Purchases and sales of government and certain other securities in the open market by the New York Federal Reserve Bank as directed by the FOMC in order to influence the volume of money and credit in the economy. Purchases inject reserves into the bank system and stimulate growth of money and credit; sales have the opposite effect. Open market operations are the Federal Reserve's most important and most flexible monetary policy tool. PORTFOLIO: Collection of all cash and securities under the direction of the City Treasurer, including Bond Proceeds. PRIMARY DEALER: A group of government securities dealers who submit daily reports of market activity an depositions and monthly financial statements to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight. Primary dealers include Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) -registered securities broker -dealers, banks and a few unregulated firms. SECONDARY MARKET: A market made for the 0 QUALIFIED PUBLIC DEPOSITORIES: A financial institution which does not claim exemption from the payment of any sales or compensating use or ad valorem taxes under the laws of this state, which has segregated for the benefit of the commission eligible collateral having a value of not less than its maximum liability and which has been approved by the Public Deposit Protection Commission to hold public deposits. RATE OF RETURN: The yield obtainable on a security based on its purchase price or its current market price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity on a bond the current income return. REPURCHASE AGREEMENT (RP OR REPOT: A repurchase agreement is a short-term investment transaction. Banks buy temporarily idle funds from a customer by selling U.S. Government or other securities with a contractual agreement to repurchase the same securities on a future date. Repurchase agreements are typically for one to ten days in maturity. The customer receives interest from the bank. The interest rate reflects both the prevailing demand for Federal funds and the maturity of the repo. Some banks will execute repurchase agreements for a minimum of $100,000 to $500,000, but most banks have a minimum of $1,000,000. REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS (RRP or RevRepo) - A holder of securities sells these securities to an investor with an agreement to repurchase them at a fixed price on a fixed date. The security "buyer" in effect lends the "seller" money for the period of the agreement, and the terms of the agreement are structured to compensate him for this. Dealers use RRP extensively to finance their positions. Exception: When the Fed is said to be doing RRP, it is lending money, that is, increasing bank reserves. SAFEKEEPING: A service to customers rendered by banks for a fee whereby securities and valuables of all types and descriptions are held in the bank's vaults for protection. purchase and sale of outstanding issues following 230 the initial distribution. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION: Agency created by Congress to protect investors in securities transactions by administering securities legislation. SEC RULE 15C3-1: See Uniform Net Capital Rule. STRUCTURED NOTES: Notes issued by Government Sponsored Enterprises (FHLB, FNMAS, SLMA, etc.) And Corporations which have imbedded options (e.g., call features, step- up coupons, floating rate coupons, derivative - based returns) into their debt structure, Their market performance is impacted by the fluctuation of interest rates, the volatility of the imbedded options and shifts in the Shape of the yield curve. SURPLUS FUNDS: Section 53601 of the California Government Code defines surplus funds as any money not required for immediate necessities of the local agency. The City has defined immediate necessities to be payment due within one week. TREASURY BILLS: A non -interest bearing discount security issued by the U.S. Treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in three months, six months or one year. TREASURY BONDS: Long-term coupon -bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities of more than 10 years. TREASURY NOTES: Medium -term coupon -bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities from two to 10 years. UNIFORM NET CAPITAL RULE: Securities and Exchange Commission requirement that member firms as well as nonmember broker -dealers in securities maintain a maximum ratio of indebtedness to liquid capital of 15 to 1; also called net capital rule and net capital ratio. 37 Indebtedness covers all money owed to a firm, including margin loans and commitments to purchase securities, one reason new public issues are spread among members of underwriting syndicates. Liquid capital includes cash and assets easily converted into cash. UNIFORM PRUDENT INVESTOR ACT: The State of California has adopted this Act. The Act contains the following sections: duty of care, diversification, review of assets, costs, compliance determinations, delegation of investments, terms of prudent investor rule, and application. YIELD: The rate of annual income return on an investment, expressed as a percentage. (a) INCOME YIELD is obtained by dividing the current dollar income by the current market price for the security. (b) NET YIELD or YIELD TO MATURITY is the current income yield minus any premium above par of plus any discount from par in purchase price, with the adjustment spread over the period from the date of purchase to the date of maturity of the bond. 231 I , I AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: V'_ COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: _ ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: _ Consideration of Appointments to the Architecture PUBLIC HEARING: and Landscape Review Committee, Community Services Commission, Cultural Arts Commission, _ Historic Preservation Commission, Investment Advisory Board and Planning Commission RECOMMENDATION: Approve the selection of: 1) one appointee to a two-year term on the Architecture and Landscape Committee; 2) two appointees to a two-year term on the Community Services Commission; 3) three appointees to a two-year term on the Cultural Arts Commission; 4) two appointees to a three-year term on the Historic Preservation Commission; 5) four appointees to a three-year term on the Investment Advisory Board; and 6) two appointees to a two-year term on the Planning Commission. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS• None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS• None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The City Clerk's office placed advertisements in the Desert Sun and sent press releases to several newspapers notifying the public of the Commission terms expiring and vacant. Letters and applications were also mailed to all Board, Commission and Committee members, whose terms were expiring, inviting them to reapply. The deadline for receiving applications was June 5, 2001. 1. Architecture and Landscape Review Committee - The term of Committee Member Frank Reynolds will expire June 30, 2001. Mr. Reynolds has applied for reappointment. Four additional applications were submitted by Douglas A. Miller, Michael J. Zellner, Donna Nelson and Marten C. Hazekamp. Copies of the applications are enclosed as Attachments 1-A through 1-E. 23 2. Community Services ommission - The terms currently held by Commissioners Deborah Bechard and Michelle Henson expire on June 30, 2001 and both commissioners have applied for reappointment. Four additional applications were received from Denise Williams, Rick P. Lantz, Michele Boudreau and Dan M. Baxley. Copies of their applications are enclosed as Attachments 2-A through 2-F. 3. Cultural Arts Commission - Two (2) two-year terms are scheduled to expire on June 30, 2001 and one vacancy exists on this commission. Commissioners Elaine Reynolds and Leslie McMillan have applied for reappointment and five additional applications have been submitted by Dan M. Baxley, Else Loudon, Rick P. Lantz, Linda M. Young and Mary Hagerth. Copies of their applications are enclosed as Attachments 3-A through 3-G. 4. Historic Preservation Commission - Two (2) three-year terms are scheduled to expire June 30, 2001 on the Historic Preservation Commission. Both positions are for a Professional Representative. Applications have been received from Commissioners Robert Wright and Michael Mitchell for reappointment. Copies of their applications are enclosed as Attachments 4-A and 4-B. 5. Investment Advisory Board - Three (3) three-year terms expire on the board as of June 30, 2001 and the recent resignation of Board Member Joseph Irwin created one vacancy. Incumbent Commissioners Milton Olander, Cyrille Mahfoud and Donald J. Moulin have reapplied for reappointment. John Pollis, Robert Schein and Cecile Mitchell have submitted applications for appointment. Copies of their applications are enclosed as Attachments 5-A through 5-F. 6. Planning Commission - Two (2) two-year terms will expire on the Planning Commission as of June 30, 2001. Commissioners Steven Robbins and Richard Butler have applied for reappointment. In addition, twelve (12) applications have been received from Paul Strohecker, Rick Lantz, William E. Hamilton, Roderick Royer, James Booth, Michael Zellner, Donna Nelson, Thomas A. Gorney, David Thorns, Mervyn Kirshner, Stuart Roth and Mark Diamon. Copies of the applications are enclosed as Attachments 6-A through 6-N. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the selection of: 1) one appointee to a two-year term on the Architecture and Landscape Committee; 2) two appointees to two-year terms on the Community Services Commission; 3) three appointees to two-year terms on the Cultural Arts Commission; 4) two appointees to three-year terms on the Historic Preservation Commission; 5) four appointees to three-year terms on the Investment Advisory Board and 6) two appointees to two-year terms on the Planning Commission; or 233 ad~ 2. Do not approve the selection of: 1) one appointees to a two-year term on the Architecture and Landscape Committee; 2) two appointees to two-year terms on the Community Services Commission; 3) three appointees to two-year terms on the Cultural Arts Commission; 4) two appointees to three-year terms on the Historic Preservation Commission; 5) four appointees to three-year terms on the Investment Advisory Board; and 6) two appointees to two-year terms on the Planning Commission; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Ju . Greek, CIVIC City Clerk Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: Attachment 1 A-E - Architecture & Landscape Review Committee Applications Attachment 2 A-F - Community Services Commission Applications Attachment 3 A-G - Cultural Arts Commission Applications Attachment 4 A&B - Historic Preservation Commission Applications Attachment 5 A-F - Investment Advisory Board Applications Attachment 6 A-N - Planning Commission Applications 234 003 ATTACHMENT 1-A s Date 20 0 % RECEIV CITY OF LA QUiNTA�Y 3Al` IG` 10 APPLICATION TO ts>VEi E K' S O F F I C E ON LA QUINTA ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMAUTTEE 4 HOME ADDRESS: ¢9- Z�l4Ade v,.s (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: 2,diys��G LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 1,4 Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. (�/7i h /AL / /.". ' ( ..5�z N'- / A. :.T- A d G 2 cl:A A,,,-Y-,,_ - C o- LTG - r%%/_Miibf /n 0 "4 , /-A - - /-. APPLICATION, ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee? ter_ _ ,/J_ /__ //_ " ,I_ . Y '/ L , _ _ -L IG _ - PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 236 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT ATTACHMENT 1-B RECEIVED JU! -4 Fr; 43 CITY L 4 CUI,1ITA CITY CL"K'S OFFICE CITY OF LA QUINTA Date 6 — V — p/ APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE NAME �m e. f .4 �9 SSE+ HOME ADDRESS: 7�j/> T,d, �� � (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (HOME) J? 9.S'9k9 (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: �—K! Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. .GiyE'17 %N zs=�1_fi��s f1� To4tw APPLICATION, ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee. L fT�LC.BB • r What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? 77 i 4=— lj�iTiy� � �� / �•�/ T/�� i ��/37/l�7�i/�ia1�L What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee? ..aL- PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 233 c19 r I I /11.r11VItIV 11-L, P,ECEIVEG Date MM O� JL1;1 -4 Fr;12: 02 CITY - CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CI :.1 OFFICE APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA ARCFIITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE NAME: M 1 Cud,VE L HOME ADDRESS: 7 q 1 'a•O C..4151•TEIZI&A �VWN/E, L • , (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: RCT/ TLCb TELEPHONE: (HOME)%i�,0 ) % % A -0 4-7 (BUSINESS) "G" IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: q � R.S. b 3 f- I OJ Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. Z U)A'na T3oizIJ 14 >++yt'16Azy 0►J joy jE 1 q33, A7TW- 7Eb my to kw4 Slhoo L. T-Hre- J 114b A-r W91(19 r►ME 13ECA ME At �Di.SPLACEn 'P 50N- 50417rez 7a NEl be (-8S2rm GIMMA13!1 . W1462E a 6eAbC-5, LIAeJ06D rMi ?F 'a ��rErzl�l� /'�,�►xt-n �16 a- cn2,4r7�/6, lJ )�,3 T CAME TC LX A114EL.ES. CA. wozV=c-.D od 1c oxt4`r- S07s-.Mj bA-rMOTISD 4ICOT SQN00L. 1955 -rPW 1957 7 .SEWC-ij I ►.► T#C- VS. ►JA\1 y . 195F -Okt-) ► q 1-4 r whs TfMea, ► CEn Irr A 'Pt.hsT%F.iO1::42m "Joth[G. A•" wc;—,%A" WotK-S.E. .^,Q,No a, Was�►��s,'R/$�,C giae Saw. 2.'EV) EwCD I� L� t7'P8 rt A^n :+nl L T2a C 02CL , 4ju uua APPLICATION, ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee. R<T r-AMLI_I AP. vA ITH IT5 F2JLTIOhIS AT = ^ laht What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? t1 oT A W 4 tP. O'P 'V RA 19IJEM S fJn W 3JT' .t1�� ,4��RJC-.^�� P�i`L� s�)�►6ES,T .��ot_yT/t7,J> As A M c M R SiL AA 7ys'F 0 C.CV Lh'- What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee? P-Gh,bI,JG A4n AT2ATcc-ry2.Xt_ 'DV-rAlt_oj Nf1b e o�IS . ScM,,j jrj I /J' *j*,4 ,rq!�L of We; o2 f I�thxl+4l;��i�►.rr Cam rEES. "i-if? �JCARS TIZII�CE �7�I T/4�T1 1�>q�TLEi► �ZV ITS . PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO 240 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT �1� ATTACHMENT 1-D RECEIVED Dated '_':i JLIN -5 PF 3: 49 CITY O� LA u a N T A CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY F'::' OFFICE APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE NAME: �1 J�r,n p HOME ADDRESS: S 5 (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS:4,—f-t,�' S"Q �-oS TELEPHONE: (HOME)--) (BUSINESS) I - 5 v 5 u IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITI/ON YOU HOLD: C <P O �or1[7� 13/)i �<fD1✓1v L�`���1 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: $L Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. UCLr x i �S;a c,�5 ,sue rb�, Lfl, �ST5kQ . l V L� �C��� (�F C. T'0 C C � 241 u11 APPLICATION, ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee. Wo 10 L14 CA =rl What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO 2 4 n LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT ATTACHMENT 1-E RECEIVED Date O/ ,•sue f . 03 CITY or- '_ CITY OF LA QUINTA CI-Y CL_E 'S OFFICE APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMI�IITTEE NAME: HOME ADDRESS: �7// l�i� �c� e4 (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: / / TELEPHONE: (HOME) -%7/ - /� �� (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 2 1, . Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. �iQc���rcr�/.4�4G—��vci�t✓F,e�S';�- �9',�' ��' Cif/"�i�✓rrir �o/� %'/%Z� . ��G'Ta-�;ti7; c l��ibr-t�i>t�o,//`l:.rroes G • 'ice-it.�oi 243� cI 1 I APPLICATION, ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and ocedures of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee. j �y - L What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? /LC !� C�2/Jyn�.vt ✓G e9 /�7 ,9 - LS hey '• GG u� rrt6.�- ti.T.s• c..-G° a.�Jt' c / ��..� ��,. � �� a2 ✓vo.-.L�Gti What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you hink you hav which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee? 1 � .rcv,..s�1 i�� �. ✓J<'�L� L�cC�i./�'JE f�Lc� ./ '4 ' 4. �i �cv�./Z� /iD '£•-y L'-c� h /Gi/? �/ f r/,S /'y��7 Z..�� PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO 244 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT i rJ i w � RECEIVE[) 2]01 JUN -5 Pt; 4: 2 I ATTACHMENT 2-A Date �- �{- o I CITY O; L OUINTA CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY C_E'r'S OFFICE APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION NAME: HOME ADDRESS: (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: " T `1 - TELEPHONE: (HOME) (-t 0 ) 5toq-J339 (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: 4 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: /(1 a'ty Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. L —/.4wl g" 4 ✓`t�� //� j�U9j�lc 4�C20 Art- If- tnC_.�1� 245 APPLICATION, COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Community Services Commission./ I � _ E What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Community Services Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Community Services Commission? Lk as ut --aelt -e .. RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 24S THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT ATTACHMENT 2-13 RECEIVED Date 2'—!JU?4-4 F�12;:,3 CITY nF La OUINTA CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CLERK'5 OFFICE APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION NAME:�i� HOME ADDRESS: ��. `u I n - l A L= ); L 1 (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: L_l`,c TELEPHONE: (HOME) �L�.� r J, _ -T�-' (BUSINESS) r� 7 1 '5 f�S IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: ! 1 �A. Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. ,P . Q, N - c IQ- mwl! �1 24 70 17 APPLICATION, COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Community Services Commission. �r�u!'Inji'1r I �-V)p wd%&P N,pw ^lpt)� iF' r 711(Y�r(SfiTIT�rinT OF-Ol c /��,`Y r� W`LlGf� -^�r_r^�caOr� �l�P�,.���3" �'�'� \� ��('•rr -i-i^r'� �rT�n,�v-��� r+.,r^ « -�a 0 hPC)-,.41 J -r)r, What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Community Services Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? �y �-r,, n v\" " o i I- �\n '-A r)c� i Iy-V W r,, YY-)4\Q f 01 O1V n ` a -n i r I I mil( I� rl fi, 0A i-" What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which -would enhance the work of the La Quinta Community Services Commission? 7 r kV\ , t .�. n �) 11(-'1 \C ?� c _ �� .�=. `-i 1i r � i _ ,^ I \ ^ .l � I <_-` �1 - - 'b'+n ^ PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO 248 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT �13 ATTA^IIAACktT 0% P P11/1 /Y Lr r11VI G1Y 1 G'l+ RECEIVED Date—.;, �npl JuN —4 A.10: 5= CITY Or L' OJI?iTA CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CLELRK S OFFICE APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION NAME: ✓ n / s C /�i ? , s n HOME ADDRESS: 7 5' 7 7G /i s f //G r /a n (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: 17 7 Z21- r / TELEPHONE: (HOME) 7 7_ `//4',2 7 (BUS SS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: e LENGTH OF RESIDEi4CE IN LA QUINTA:,- i Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. 14 �19 APPLICATION, COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Community What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Community Services Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? /n/ i /n / G t e � a r `' 0 C/ c'ef-! What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Community Services Commission? G j r PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 250 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT DENISE Wn.LL4MS--00MMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION APPLICATION BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH: My education, work experience, and civic involvement experience make me an idea candidate to serve on the Community Services Commission. Education: Completed Master of Public Administration at California State University, Fullerton. Completed Bachelor of Arts Degree in Sociology at California State University, Fullerton. Community College Instructor Credential K-12 Teaching Credential (Substitute) Work Experience: 30 years experience in Community and Social Services work; 12 years with County and City government and 18 years private nonprofit. All but 2 of these years were spent in Management and Administration. County of Orange —Staff Development City of Paramount, California —Administrative Intern Rancho Community College —Instructor Southwest Community Church —Director of Social Ministries Episcopal Services Alliance —Amnesty Program Administrator Various Social Services Agencies —Director of Resource Development Community Involvement: I have Volunteered for Children, Adult, and Senior Services. Orange County Community Development Council —Board Member/Chair St, Vincent.&PauLEon ank—Beard Memherlghair High School, Junior High School, Children's programs, Little League Homeless Shelters, Food Banks, Soup Kitchens 251 321 DENISE wn.LLWS—COMMUNrrY SERVICES CONMUSSION APPLICATION Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Community Services Commission. I am thoroughly familiar with the structure of city government. My Master in Public Administration prepared me for work in this field. I interned for the City of Paramount in administration. I have attended and participated in numerous city council and commission meetings in different cities, counties, and states. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Community Services Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? In a city that is growing a quickly as La Quinta, it is important to prepare for the future needs of its increasing population, while continuing to serve its present population. The City has a diverse population that requires differing services depending on the age, economics and ethnicity of the resident. Funding is always a concern for where one need is met, another must be delayed. It is important to be creative, and fair in the decision making process. What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the la Quinta Community Services Commission? I have an enthusiastic, energetic, caring approach to any task put before me. I enjoy working with people to accomplish goals for the common good. I am reliable, dependable, and trustworthy. I am always eager to put in more time and effort than is necessary to simply complete the job. 252) ATTACHMENT 2-D Due -5- 25-of RECEIVED CITY OF LA QUINTA 2" 1 MA Y 2 F: ; 1: 11 CITY 0- Lr C U I N T A APPLICATION TO SERVE CITY CLEn„ S OFFICE ON LA QUINTA 6UWM=M ARM COMMISSION G'oHw.c.1V:�y �CkU(cq 16K q• HOME ADDRESS: 7472o CI:L c Sz. 4 n,1,.,;4 CA 'q zz.r3 (Must be a La Quints resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: J P, µ�<- TELEPHONE: (HOME) 17 ( - 3C 7o (BUSINESS) 777 - f 9 /7 IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: ---- LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: / Mo Ak Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. Q.A N4ji,,tLKF-il,.../ Q /S6_I� . L. P.f4P,mZ U. �, `73 .DQPc--3P t7-sr c 4 61 r.,, f M6 pl f,�o/1 ftN 0 y�z'�lrAdon �i u e•l oe �yerio✓ G� j 021 APPLICATION, eY114WEPtL A W COMMISSION PAGE 2 �-0µp W,�v Ze'eVices Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission? C` r1r -CA. J c l b.'L I �.SG 4-S G_ N Ar-'P4DrL- (AL& SO /,trU �eeo (.JUALV3 4&l !/ PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 254 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT n ATTACHMENT 2-E RECEIVED Date K21 Bfm -5 Pli 4: 43 CITY G- L-' QUIPITA CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CL= K'S OFFICE APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION NAME: l `VUO-E 3000(-ei10 HOME ADDRESS: �';(.015 t r�1 Yl_� CLI.,� (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: 5l c-3 1G �) � n � i St. z6 C_an TELEPHONE: (HOME) c) Qk) - 2, g e 2 (BUSINESS) `d$p► � Gb- 9 09 c) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: / �flll)Af Fti l`�AA kc— _JEVE iU�'�'�}EniT /-1MEl.ICd✓1 G�(t'� � C,TA 4sS m,ert— 5(✓/ E,�r— LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 1 / Jam Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. �uolvuYNert-f' �(,u( iv .�hiE,i..cor� �x��e, C3%ay2z�� �rxk4d �5( / C Dv a— r , � ' >f ccn� 12 EcJ �I l c.cL,� ,J-,(krcy-act �, {�lu r�,� l jM�Yehen�,✓r 1-e� 0c.7 o h L., +b (e ce � ._ ty�/1J�1✓E./N E.tIT /'�'� dCtl `1(Q.�a bQ- Ca- �.S ��.C✓!� rYl �.S i{,i[irLl,%tn rn"')kefvw.-� Aa3 6en C&N Ieifn 1 r�In 1 -elq� c" r�Q��nef e v,�c ie�,'UQ,+ of t_QMS s.hQ 1 C J (ftl17 �7 .7 S. C'kni, lam_ V, P (ele 'C! 14- aR j��Yii�it(yS- QU--t— i4,S. Div LQ - Ay3o; 3 rnrcd c� CnfiiE L,a,, "'3•. LAJr+s -Tr ,, , Ca��ec+s e� L) 255 r, 0S TION, COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Community Services Commission. IJ Mu L�ktr-d1,WIM4 `N:.s )Pel*'J �0 QaylckL InejF 7 \listoka �j'N^4. Ct19.t Cam, \� C�hvw..,.�.l�a[J nvads %� rrcKc�ttw,r ctlnMv..t �2utl2 Ci.4' poi \ 9 �t c� ►� v cl a 6 um t rtt ii.,, d.o 61, Cc:r.+,r. w, C2 oplt}�nT lV tC�J PM/� M Q�nntA. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Community Services Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? We C4 o rhea n� r�ec sere ce-5 rzkK % 4-c iu -kr.A IS ertw(C�li C_1k+ rvm., .., c ._ �',� �r VT:r .y.7 �e,✓ Ccy�..� .ir., c.. t-i,.� N +:-t Co........,. :i,,. ,' �D Qc\ur r, it li.e..... o.-, a \\ \!ems sely\ cai .,¢+eia t# , Al1-Q ( e sovrcti o-. r.. IA Iott o,r-c—\ V. '?Tro" to ihe.' What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Community ServicesCommission? C Jtyt •.—x C. (' I Lgita c ys c L co .-• e1 '; n , (1 17%-, c rt I o of to r\ v i\ cr¢.e 1 � ✓8 rr er c L'. — C.- "l n lce+ le eTv noe rlc) W\�\-• �„-�,.�c� (C tiCLfC.2n L,1..,ic. r—<A'tkrA [n rnJ CAc1G 6� ,.Rtl _ L lt, �r i72Q. Ji '(Y .kr'ec\ o..�d �Ns\.eC. "\U ilyaie5icr. LI Eb I II^t ulob� Cb\.Placl WJ� r-\A QA'j tw�'[cr-i �. e(t 2f,i2 Cw C.— rC,, & m.a QjIcIC PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 256 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT .l .' b ATTACHMENT 2-F Date RFrR'fti�i-OQ 2]H JUN 12 PH 3; 33 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY OF LA OUINTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMLSSION .�3f+ke NAME: "DRY nn • 6Ax LE Y t,,,. HOMEADDRESS: It"IM mrtLACAS CT- •r LACP01.3-rA . A y 9z2517. (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: CGLLeGc of TN-C xseeF ' 43- 500 ,,,eN Ra ' a„c _ Pnc w� d Gt'C9 gZzE TELEPHONE: (HOME) '760 • %4--lo64- (BUSINESS) -7G0• 771A z.7C , IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: CZLLeC&C CrT*,E DESe-(i - DEA0 of ,NS QL1[T,b^J /Cr+1EF rr1STQ�'c(�2�i1Z CFPIC�2 VW-W%,'9h CA4100 SBs M LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: IL 41- r< w , Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to dudes of the position you seek. Ati+Df;,,,,IC- tQt6U*54k12,;&a-5 AT CMLcGC Cr-7KC ksce ,PF-u.ntAG p(OtTH/2st ,C^ �txctl'ue�„/P.tzr-r��cr..� /rntec�tcg Fse,2arus, tca_rN�xe,� nnbx�r�;.-e. a.�ee Laeti,ti-A ,.� Q=Ttir-UX a)C5aT CHilrtii?x2cf trr��mLRcL L2cunu C DcJ�Kw:cafT F CwGAiiCt% Cz W rYt I rrr: t c Puts BD OF 5112 w-W5 Fc C C r(,)vv% 84 0 , -)tA k-b� As Wk" bg!5 c C0C tcL0W7tt CA117i-): Of T)+e "E>aI (1TLWn_" PArm&t cone-otUtt re"',S -) �"t QF b1eCTTDK. STQl A:C r M-tLST #4 4P--r1C4fAVW- Iti 1NG Fr WIC eF lA r.�rtq .G%!1ziftL.-i As,-t 4t4"1;S 't0 QV&ATY c;- i-AiToitj 9 4-R'a CaJ S 257 0�7 APPLICATION, COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Community Services Commission. T Ll£6UQi SE�hC� TA7 Pr) 'tDt TI�e N+4�T - a4ACglcn 4sqw`O — evrifQWE Dell ve`L" Cr' PIJEI.�1MFi�SBPIIGdS i� THE ClgZa-P S 06CE 1m TLf*ns2o✓tA StWV i� S 6izcjv a T;M.- or the the La Quinta have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? Services; -Commission and do you %t;i'W -2*C C-'AA.Ln.T 1*2 64EW'11 eF I-q (2 `IL-) •A IT 15 "1 noM 1740T 4W-Ng %ii TH THIS C.a?ng;,"fl•{ SKISiS L�^ntP�2l11eT,IStv4 (tNY+�+ye1G 246`5 S.1tiP-S .�s1C.-+Nl- -� INfLI;'a-'C6S Pldwa,,I c,;C0-22Yz ISSL'iS Z4C fNWL 't fF F }r'YlIU2L ,uTL` !A S�(.iIM'IA rtM c S ` ,l,MN�I'C, A ' �rzJef � Aue�Sl6L.0 OAIKS � Ye:'�c� evcRetgSzr«� Bu'�'t%`'T1�S /�-t....CcS s £ •tne¢�C nfe.Lss;►L�. •rrrc'eSc,• so+ee'en R� �,.+ RaJ�cArt r.�e h 'DeL, tA T1tE P+A.,+c ra: /1<.�-J�,� ,I+C 6M—, 4SStgLE L.I FPS WL C` Ftg- Lt* gt;,.:.T19 G nZ%*41. What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Community Services Commission? INY CS�AP,.s7.f S.: IS A M'11.M iKI �IL�T`-' 'AA iSit,02F ILtSd +:ii'6LC 2 L�(4s4yy1 LMSlet 1LCN S1i JJtP"`S SO KvrTUY"S'; d 4-61-I CM Cr N A4 AF s lko To DY.isi +J &uA+uA6 4- z I- -ra �'s�r A " "¢�F._ ' `HVL:C, rt ttw�rn6rS 1 061 Af 4C&--, 9ut'S P4;'AACb( DW,410-)" /*LVIL'rr t .a-v. R-Ws+--4 pLj}•"-YL L�by C.A;ILL I.AI1)kt5T0WMi A oaccL" AJ hu-eF my A-- CTe,,S Ti- c iTtc&Eii. IPPLe L"F TFhS G w.JSSi D..1 IN 74V r-, W—C OF SACU,N-Q0t ! ITS St`U9,'bmj&r6 t` ttZ TE 'Tlh; LAcoJNccL PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 258 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT r• J�H ATTACHMENT 3-A CITY OF LA QuiNTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON Date —44 $---/— ?rN MAY 3 ; Air: IC: 10 CITY 0' Li, QUINTA CITY CLEF.WS OFFICE LA QUINTA CULTURAL ARTS CONEMSSION I.Ca7'krj Ie1 (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) 41% d�D, vI rv�C BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (HOME\ AQ 5 4 u — 19'9 D (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: S F LF— EMIT 1, V Fh DL1J�& G�Si yi �=U)C 1/zY out nF llnx l:jnn/� LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 13 Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. 13 Q 1IA4 hA iC c—j 0y%1 C NA >� 1?} I �E K�! 0 �Lr�C� C G 3 E A kc wt >� Iss1�,� w1Ewlg�� e.L)LTOz, gL F)k4-s P-, f,s 259 in3 APPLICATION, CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? 1 What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission? S721Nrn Q/Ivf l>N / 0, I//N q PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 260 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT p '10 RECEIVED ZJPJIMAY3j Af;11:37 CIT , of L A QUINTA CITY OF LA QuiNTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ATTACHMENT 3-B lC1-�s Date 1 ► 1Cy �L k- v APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION NAME: C rn 116 HOME ADDRESS: 1 l I l 1 i L I 1c\ L�L I� IN17- (Must beta La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS:�I lj� �JL �C�{�y1 1 �,L CA C� TELEPHONE: (HOME) S (o (BUSINESS) - IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YO HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: ((L/! Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. cool 1'1l_) e PST ill I IL nryl, It, '' I ►�Ct tIC( 4_ �ti-liY'I )Y I c 11'1 c{-A t l.aC1(Ll 1( rn I h 031 APPLICATION, CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION PAGE 2 "escribe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Cultura Arts Commission. u roc What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? L4 I +-� C )-y'k, k �zv L,►'1 R nib c What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission? �C(r 4G, PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO 2 6 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT ATTACHMENT 3-C CITY OF LA QUINTA Date r<• Iz-oc RE CEIVEG 2660 JUN 12 PH 3: 33 APPLICATION TO SERNT yY 0'' f A O'UINT ON . C�`RKS OFFICE LA QUINTA CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION NAME: Dna %A - P A.�(Lty � t' ` HOMEADDRESS: - 9 -1" pA 44,*ctrs e y LA �� l.o n9 ck � 511 s S (Must be a La Quinta resident and a igibk to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: cmL-y& e+- vnE %f5&r : Al -''en tuenrrl vPt w� D�s.e p1 trued TELEPHONE: (HOME) _'16e. - r&4 -1cc4 (BUSINESS) 760•-M-KCC IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: CMLt.-G► or m4cc br%ef-r - b Am G Ister- INSi21:C�fCN r?L ln�{9LtY... ,6c.3U.m (scwggL f7APrtuee).: cf,N, A SGs pal -A 'yA&lr -1-tw,e 11N LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: t7- 4& 6 V.t Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. IDcfi A11- Ftmya ldC'7r-JA 5.-Prcr un, vc& 1y w¢, mu _,e e4gcr.u5 duce fi-,P +L( "1-;mr cf „ -sEe— r�,ry � INeL.i.'a,A{G ,iLC tiNt 1•,F p 'PLfK2,b►tlS !? Ste+! �CxZ SN [ ty1,X5 LtSU(7R /I{-5 � F�'Y-�tth ING /dCiS RRi 1 1 'it-h:'Ni•r�,LS , SPetCi Rti L'YL�S /NGt_v�,N � IN A3ek (LN^i rtrUil[-trnlS Ptr� �-A cAs�t�LtuTi10 FoQ "k+b6i£M "oF il►6 !I¢r� 4r Orb 64-b -kw0j) bif-tMT oaL� ILt o��crer?.n19,, OF S"CeAL New PPG Ams. it.1 Ce¢+ tl CWOL' wkhiC� Tt ^jicpt_ TrtCit'�R , (!,edftltC � f �1(jr'Mt- N, /'2t,"v1o�S iC• •{.-�Li. n�, PnM'k4Vl{f•#} riCR Aetil.vlt''.vdCAyH" lrrra, P4L4#1 tJesa,(~r t-c"Xtt, b4wcu: ffitwr A VTILU C.) comwurmer 40o-et A•. Pnw.,oCsex' btiLLdTE�L GT�LEN et- urtA,it cuep_rwTLV rKC_*&GL Cop"te /1 VQctL.^ NR7MRcn5 �tl1V tF�E^� BCYiLDOF O, RS `yW�: i'37LYrS" ,0 A-eU�lY.a(, NtzPl/fG LogGu,/unr to 6aAltt4 Chi LFt Ma FuR P.,-C o J 263 ,' 33 APPLICATION, CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission. 'HESE /di6,: 5E-r Pdcs.1 ,rJ ra.,S1'7a r. QJErL::_aYt oiS TtWr S r}NI: S'A]�Ifc11 £ Fi:ll'Tyu SBis':R�r O HSI[ALL�I TNC dvwtA&-WN& fte AsC Is-ib -y eV0A-+JT %11UATt01US 1O'14 nAZe�rmcu-)n-loaf *t Aunp#j W:! '-M t!� rw Tile C.e)9jPc c¢wLLY e4k,gTA CF WEAL, GCIH PA7-I . SUEw'VS f FAuLLTIKsy Qacti t),r -ntc wmr s'• - I x-ItCh-L `i£r Mrs"- C-rFtr;W L b6L-V6V,Y OF A8eU6 ID LACPUIrr-A S 4 ITS (A-s-siv s . T 4NtmL't or, N'WCH C+rLQAAI_ ItIS'f01L'r AfV&r%TtN Q It&-' 2i -, sice)S ,2 AE ZN&*a VrA'it11: #0 What specific Issues or problems face the La Quinta Cultu al Arts Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? ArH u[T Rt4. 'iQ-:: of, H1.+� C,'Cu.-r.r' PeiSS ING 16C✓£S/P/c 6L..'1N6r IILTHD(art1 s S'-5P,TT Fi'n..h WO `h'WFC- P1WPA1%S Rio h1ftrA116 `kTM Af•C F16SM046 CNALLEr-lGf.S• wouet A: w., PG25L1,r,iC CAP)rM FuND,r.16 Aj)111tn%1CS 1V P-jwAriLE rC-A'W'Ae, LPfOG'&N-T16 reP &'rK C Vh LD tWW X ASI L.,� , r A A LiOu Q,♦ti t 'D,Jc A .1 c.J ?ld'C-�AW wer /1, H4N C A e rQal,.l r Iu�-ZE.s� In; 1tir-u[��riE �calnr BL^.;�z;s V1Er2.+n�. What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission? wkk CL'o.LCu- Z&6 IS A 1416 Hy,S) 61 LtT%l LL-PtC-2%"VP A�Lt P A. S Ale 6nC A-P?U K IRA A-N-L-e d OCP 5'LzWW7Sr Sou(meuc`%i J a &Z&y ,r tf,�^(�txlr>,kT[ IS MILLI O�J rNY Ay7 AttT 'D I)e-tc-icr-J I<IAYNY IS 'IC u`+TL�e..I• •04PL.T�• SLYY ra%Ukca PI V A Cr+aScs. S (4,,t D ACa4- -- nea•+rl Czl r b6tisims. /4I.c-a4fis . i Am A T'k'r"u w+k "ILL L Naa'ess ,� ( ?wL: Iwo Att M-, I}LT1INS TKtCiblki! 0L- aLC IN 1)*C 1nJ'l4€ OF LA Q,od-A of TWS 1 ITS sU(i12D,N#,TrC ho 'TV Tom.; Cin-, CaL%jLkL-. PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 264 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT Jj A ATTACHMENT 3-D DATE: May 30. 2001 CITY OF LA QUINTA RECEIVED APPLICATION TO SERVE fW � .r, • S n ON LA QUINTA CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSIC#'Y C, " s OFFICE NAME: Else Loudon HOME ADDRESS: 78-417 Magenta, La Quinta, CA 92253 (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City). TELEPHONE: (HOME) 760-345-4081 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 2 '/2 years Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. Education • 1 have an European education with an U.S. equivalent of a Bachelor and Master degree. I have proficiency in French, German and English. Business Experience • Secretary, NBC, Hollywood -two years • Assistant to President of Foote, Cone, & Belding Advertising- one year • Entrepreneurial: Owned, developed and started up two companies. -- 10 years • Principal and teacher of a Private Foreign language School; supervised staff of 16 teachers - 14 years; and Teacher Cal Prep Encmo-two years; Teacher evening courses -three years Civic Involvement • Community -Sherman Oaks • Assistance League of Southern California-25 years; held various leading positions of Vice President- Ways and Means; President of Auxiliary, etc. • Sherman Oaks Jr. Women's Club; Chairperson of Ways and Means, Chairperson of Youth activities dealing with delinquent boys at Camp IOlpatrick, and other leading positions. • Community -Coachella Valley • Hostess of La Quinta's "Culture in the Courtyard" - Jan, Feb, March and April • Assisted in the presentation of La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission's year 2000 The Arts and You" symposium • Chairperson for the 2001 Coachella Arts Alliance Conference, "Impact of the Arts on the 1-10 Corridor • Presently computer instructor at the Rancho Mirage Library: 2 years Community Commitment- I have demonstrated involvement and dedication to the communities in which I live and wish to further direct my talent and experience to the city of La Quinta. I have attended many Cultural Arts Commission meetings, including a meeting with the Community Services Commission. I have traveled worldwide and have a broad knowledge of the arts. Hobbies include: art dosses, golf lessons, tennis, bicycling, rollerblading and swimming. 265 APPLICATION, CULTURAL ARTS PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quints Cultural Arts Commission. I have read your general information in regards to the functions, regulations and procedures of the La Quints Cultural Arts Commission which gave me a good overall. picture of what you would expect of me as a member of this commission. For example: A. To advise the City Council, other City Boards and appropriate committees in the fields of culture, on matters relating to civic arts programs. B. To encourage and develop public cultural awareness and involvement 5. Recommending funding opportunities, such as conducting fundraisers, and contacting representatives of public and private funding agencies and art patrons. What specific issues or problems face the La Quints Cultural Arts Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? Having attended numerous Cultural Arts Commission Meetings, it appears to me that the commissioners should be aware of the time required to complete projects that are before the commission beyond attending monthly meetings. They should also understand that their primary task is to provide recommendations to the City Council. What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quints Cultural Arts Commission? During my lifetime, I have fulfilled a great many different and exciting ventures in business and in general cividcultural pursuits which prepare me now to expand even further into the cultural arts within the La Quints area. I have been fortunate to have traveled extensively; therefore, broadening my knowledge of the arts worldwide. PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION NO LATER THAN JUNE 8, 2001 TO: CITY CLERK P.O.11OX 1504 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WnJ INGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. -I ,: 6 ATTACHMENT 3-E - RECEIVED 51 JU,I -5 PK 28 Date j1jnr- — 01 CITY 3QUINTA CITY OF LA QUINTA CIT'f APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION HOME ADDRESS: -1-7 - 3 4S 'a (l ,o jOhO,r•a (Must be a La Quinta resident y kM and eligible to vote in the BUSINESS ADDRESS: 43-soo M&Y4-c %e. 1 _ I TELEPHONE: (HOME) —j') 1 - (BUSINESS)_] IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: A LENGTH OF/SIDFl1\CE IN LA QUINTA: 1'0� 1�eSe1�� S Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. — ZS 1 5 Ch i Q��t `AI,s�ness 0"yre►- 1 ra Je-k e r ©``o�ctiv��Zed CUetn-fS� r 4 ESL *-4 icb lC-A-ia G C'a,n'C u sic- �i ( S ut=es S �� t �ux�.-� s 267 337 APPLICATION, CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Cultural ,tits / u SLe C eu VIC I \ - OLSS I Sr Ii�GL l ln�i o� I ;% - CjffV" M t J v1 J'Ll I •A iUn I � I. w1 r �w? — �.. , ,. � . ..K What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? Q\ pCCn�-u v%I - Cg%i&A-%S ' e \raIrte- -e eVn+-s/9-44ic-oL What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you thinV you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission? ((�� Ptr+m-- firoLck-tct,.-'e1 l Prom--eSs�M"'CZ( 1 PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 268 LINDA Me YOUNG 77-345 Calle Sonora City Clerk P.O Box 1504 78496 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 To Whom It May Concern: La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 771-1535 Please accept my application and supporting resume for the position as Arts Commissioner for the City of La Quinta for a two-year term. I believe my professional and work experience qualifiy me for the position. Just as important is my dedication to my community. The challenges and opportunities that lay ahead are many as our city grows, but the need to maintain a quality of life must include the arts in a variety of forms. Though I have recently moved to this community I have lived in the desert most of my life and have chosen La Quinta as my permanent residence. I want to be involved. I will commit to the time required and give attention to the duties of an Arts Commissioner, and will also go beyond that with my enthusiasm and creative energy. I recognize there is a Council Meeting on June 19's where this application will be considered, however due to previous commitments with the College of the Desert for a workshop out-of-town I will be unable to attend. I trust that you will still consider my application. Thank you. Sin�cere�ly, � �� k Linda M. Young 269 'P39 LINDA YOUNG 77-345 Calle Sonora La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 771-1535 Oaxcrrw Support my community as an Arts Commissioner for the city of La Quinta QUALIFICATIONS Master Teacher-K-Adult Business -Technical English, International Experience. Classroom or Private Lessons, Teacher and Trainer, computer proficient. Business owner: 20 years, Artist, Administrative, marketing, consulting. PERSONAL Committed to professional excellence and leadership Excellent interpersonal communication skills Enthusiastic, self -motivated, artist, entrepreneur EDUCATION Master in Teaching: Certified in California and Washington K-Adult: English, Bilingual Education (CLAD), History, Art, Teaching English as a Second Language (TEFL -TESL). Master's Degree: 1996 The Evergreen State College, Olympia, Washington Bachelor's Degree: 1993 TESC: Communications, English, Art, Business Certified as a Teacher -Trainer in Customer Service, Spanish for Professionals EXPERIENCE College of the Desert, Palm Desert, CA 1999-Current Economic Development & Community Education -Coordinate classes, contract instructors, develop curriculum, Project Coordination, Contract Education, Workplace Learning -Outreach Specialist -Welfare to Work -Work with governmental and community agencies, community, educational institutions, grant process ESL Instructor, International Language Program Ten Years After -International Conference on Democracy -Prague, Czech Republic Participated with East-West Institute and Society 89 in a conference with World Leaders who discussed the historic perspective of the fall of Communism in Eastern Europe. Assisted with international media and conference organization. Private Lessons -Europe Traveled extensively in Switzerland, Germany, Czech Republic, Italy, Spain, France teaching former students preparing for Cambridge exams International Center for American English, San Diego, CA 1999 Beginning to Advanced Grammar, Business English, Reading -Writing, American Culture, Film, World Topics, Conversation. La Costa Canyon High School, San Diego, CA 1998-99 English, American Literature, World Literature, English as a Second Language. University of California San Diego, English Language Program, 1997-1998. English language and travel program for international students. Grammar, Conversation, Reading -Writing, Activities, Current Topics. Lewis County School District, Chehalis, WA 1997. 27 0 Substitute grades 4-12 in English, Art, History, English as a Second Language. I{ 10 REFERENCES EF International Language School, The Evergreen State College, Olympia, WA 1996. Created and taught ESL curriculum for International adult students. Basic Studies, Grammar, American Culture, Film Studies. Mexico and Central America, Traveled extensively 1996-1997. Private tutoring. Developed and taught student -centered practical and Vocational English. Studied Spanish, Latin American History, Culture, and Art. Work Experience Executive Assistant to President: Klein Bicycle Corporation, Chehalis, Washington, 1990 - 1991. Responsible for administrative duties and confidential files for International Corporation. Business Owner: Z Design: Winlock, Washington, 1975 — 1990. Formed and operated sole -proprietorship to design and produce art and craft products. Established accounts, participated in national art and trade shows, managed employees. ❑ Jacke Hall Green, Dean Economic Development & Community Education College of the Desert, 760-776-0161 ❑ Pam LiCalsi, Director -Workplace Learning College of the Desert 776-0161 ❑ Alexis Lasheras, Director, International Center for American English, San Diego, CA, 619/456-1212, icae@cts.com ❑ Roxanne Nuhaily, Academic Director, University of California San Diego, CA, 619/534-0584. ❑ Anne Markholt, Master Teacher, University of Washington, 206/725-0413. Can supply additional references MAILING ADDRESS e-mail-4indamaria98@hotmail.com 271 ATTACHMENT 3-F RECEIVED Date 5-2i-or 12: 2y C I T Y 07 L q OF LA QUINTA CITY C!E; $OFF APPLEATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION 2- HOME ADDRESS: 75 7 26 C,: - S-, _ 4 a,, . ;, (' P '�F z e S- (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: J Pr n �f TELEPHONE: (HOME) ( 7 (- 3(0 7o (BUSINESS) 777 - 9 9 / 7 IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: -- LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: / Mo"-f(~ Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. fl•A AAIZ/4(F-TI, 14 At, (.I..s_;_6 U. IS'(. r-� uJ u y Oy S ht ., p2 c A S A T�Zs ti dam— ✓%21� LPc 7yo R C, d / 4 70 �73 tt t, tt w 0k1.1 ' t-+ e n. ti �C—_ (k� iP ...E to o+f,40tL. la PA,-- leCV I �) Pr+o Arf, a Iti 2 c ra� t APPLICATION, CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? What specific specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Com/mission?/ ( I� WRCIIIEYt 1�OUOcAife ! ��O Kk�2 A✓Li-&,4r Or,�N06c- /S' P Z 6A r/ ft l te, to r (.jIN 44 G� Palca4en- (A4, f' Sb) /`fit J eINL',gLy 1b— . 0') 1.1'e - yJ,-j'pN (l_ PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 273 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT } .13 ATTACHMENT 3-G 274 •I►/\kkI�li HOME Date WE9V Z MAl( 3 ; PM 3: 08 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY OF L: OUATA APPLICATION TO SERVE CITY C L E P.. Y. ' S O F F I C E ON LA QUINTA CULTURAL ARTS CONEMSSION (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (HOME) 76D - 771- DdoO (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be _sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. y it W —ig �q2� "Meel'r- -Z" 12eP 4/L iC'is�li — )OmaI'L tv&0 Nuts a /zovre rr /It9criarz, 'ar�n'�er a rf P��>✓� � or e►- �-!�s" Q� ,r-�� yea rs. 275� APPLICATION, CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Cultura Arts Co� issio What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems?? eeixs// /%JD/7' s lall, 1- 4s 7 1f e /liCall -z/r What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enha ce the work of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission? � / Q WW GL?7/St�' 1,�.%/ i/� A. "y/:r l C 44 PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QU INTA, CA 92253 2 7 F THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT ATTACHMENT 4-A Date AD- ' Z3 - C= i P,z0ZIVED CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE C I T" O F L A a U I N T A ON CITY CLEni,'S OFFICE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NAME: f � �� G� `NI*�/ C-1 M-fl— HOME ADDRESS: i4c.I.3?jp 6.4YY1) /JO I==AV4" 1]� BUSINESS ADDRESS: 39; TELEPHONE: (HONIE)a,(;.,Q. 2c >e> eys 2:t;. (BUSINESS) 7%.o . t4-0 ,140E IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION?: Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. cu '(n LAB O.J 1A7 APPLICATION, HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, duties and procedures of the La Quinta Historic Commission. ptil Three members of the Commission shall be appointed from among professionals in the disciplines of architecture, history, architectural history, planning, or other historic preservation -related disciplines, such as urban planning, American studies, American civilization, cultural geogaphy, or cultural anthropology. Please explain which specific discipline qualifies you for appointment. Two members of the Commission shall be lay members who have demonstrated special interest, competence, experience or knowledge in historic preservation, American studies, cultural anthropology, cultural geography, or other historic preservation -related disciplines. Please explain your special interest/experience/knowledge as a lay member. ka 273 APPLICATION, HISTORICAL PRESERVATION PAGE 3 What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the Historic Preservation Commission? 0 0 PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF LA QUINTA P. 0. BOX 1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 279 .i19 ATTACHMENT 4-B Date S - 3 0 - o / RECEIVED I JUtI - : Pp; L: 55 CITY OF LA QUINTA I T Y OF L A Q UIN T A APPLICATION TO SERVE TY CLERK'S OFFICE ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NAME: M 11 CkAEI- RALL 14/ t-6AFLL HOME ADDRESS: fst -tj 6 A y22.6o BUSINESS ADDRESS: PA. TELEPHONE: (HOME) (76a) 311 0 -3 64 Z (BUSINESS) X/ h IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: A(A LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: -t4,' HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? : W S Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. SEE /N i' fi A L �lf�f L/c' A�i ON 280 jro Date January 10, 1999 CITY OF LA QUIIVTA RECEIVED APPLICATION TO SERVE 12 PM 1 25 ON 0: L."", QUINTA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION' ' ' ", 1' CLERK NAME: Michael R. Mitchell HOME ADDRESS: 38 Lucerne Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260 BUSINESS ADDRESS: Retired TELEPHONE: (HOME) (76ol 34o-3677 (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: o HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION?: Un Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. SFR ATTA(:ART) T1nrTTMFMT FnA ATT QTTRQrQTTVNZ—QYBSISAi1S 281 APPLICATION, HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONMUSSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, duties and procedures of the La Quinta Historic Commission. Three members of the Commission shall be appointed from among professionals in the disciplines of architecture, history, architectural history, planning, or other historic preservation -related disciplines, such as urban planning, American studies, American civilization, cultural geogaphy, or cultural anthropology. Please explain which spec discipline qualifies you for appointment. Two members of the Commission shall be lay members who have demonstrated special interest, competence, experience or knowledge in historic preservation, American studies, cultural anthropology, cultural geography, or other historic preservation -related disciplines. Please explain your special interest/experience/knowledge as a lay member. APPLICATION, HISTORICAL PRESERVATION PAGE 3 What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the Historic Preservation Commission? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION NO LATER THAN JUNE 15, 1998 TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF LA QUINTA P. O. BOX 1504 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. 283 '> 3 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH: Education: BA 3i0tcry 1973 :.Cng 2eaC"n _:ate BA Anthro• 1974 L:::g Beac'.: state MA Anthro 1984 Long Beach State Professional Organizati,Dns: L' S Lat:n American S Russian Histories Concentration in Archaeology Focus or. Southern California Coastal Prehistory Member of the Society :f ?r=fas3i=•nal Archaeologist since 1985 Certified in Field Studies Cofounder and member of the Coachella Valley Archaeological Society Employment History: 1916-1977 Archaeologist for the BLM, Surprise Resource Area (Great Basin Archaeology) 1978-1984 Gradnata student. Cal. State :.ong Beach 1983 Field Archaeologist !exczvaticn nd inventory) for James Brock & Paul L::n enw i t =_ in County. 1934-1987 Field Director for Scie:;tif'_c Resource Surveys Inc., Huntington Beach. Super`:iSe2 i:: =:",t .C'y all �] EXCaVat10:1: thr �li yh OUt southern California. 1987-1999 Staff archaeologis- f�,r tha ^e:ltn Springs Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management. Responsible for inventories, reviaw of archaeological reports for• federal-Ctions and le.d for their cultural resource program. Initiated saction 106 cf the National Historic Preservation. Act _..:___,,. t:. ti'e California Office of H_stori _ 1' eser:et _ .... _ __..::Ted N:.t ive Purer -can consul tatloils and inaU_re:'. January 31, 1999 Rati_ec 984 KNOWLEDGE OF LA QUINTA HISTORIC COMMISSION ::1xjr,ission Cc=vents :,n :..: _an:i:ng �:nd :,the:: actions which might impact :f:e r.cn ist�Dric a:i:l prehistoric c::VironmenL of the City of La Quinta. Endeavors to eciuc8tc the 'plot:.: is concerning La Qui Ilta's hist.ri.. heritage. Makes C:iciicndati,?I".s fo: the pre5vrvati Dn of historic landmarks. QUALIFIED DISCIPLINE AND EXPERTISE My a;:tensive background in .: rwl _esource management satisfying Loth ti:c Californi-a: E7::' _:".Illa:.tal Quality Act when I was employed znke i.rlVate sector and the Naticilal Historic Preservation Act when : was employed by the Buraau of Land Management. I have backgrounds both in archaeology and history. I also have extensive experience in associating with local Dative American tribes. I have extensive knowledge of the local archaeology, both historic and prehistoric. I also have been involved in nominati::g eligcle archaeological sites to the National Register of Historic Places. 285 r ATTAt`URACKIT C A ! 11/1 111VILIV 1 RECEIVED Date L 2r_I MAY 25 Pii 12: 3 2 1°9f F1 gr25 Ffi ;: , f�� ry z4 CITY OF LA OUIiYtAE• OF CI 0� •N 0"J c1T Y c' El l's IW&ATION TO SERVE c`ER' 'S OFFICE ON LA QUINTA INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD NAME: ! ! ` L HOME ADDRESS: / /' Z ( L'F BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (HOME) `) 7 71 — 55 (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOXED, WHERE YOU WORK,' ND 7 7 ON YOU HOLD: -171 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 2 / A . HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS BOARD? f`p Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement ment and other background. Please be sure to includ experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. 286 6 281 - ., RECEIVED Date e CITY OFt.9A3 Z4 A IV 24 nF LA QUIhTA APPLICATIOIQ(�1 RIC ON C LA QUINTA INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD 0 HOME ADDRESS: 7 g—, ?0 n C CL- bko( tD Ia �Qu aLt7c ; C'e4.Q z a � 3 BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (HOME - % 7 /— 3 S (� / (BUSINESS) _ IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: _ / /��/er3Y HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS BOARD? Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. 1 C /� c�id QS CL C.1 ?! Reel � �< jt duct i5t (q CCc V kelA t y , A- 0441 dL- 1(©l rS 4dV4A46)v ,Lkp. V110 Sal e e l >fiYl T , C Wk to vets I e cytew �`oti vyta�,� A:el v 1c t ( x w a APPLICATION, INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD II PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations. and nrnc adurre nf rho r Or«1116 ,aaucs ur Proo,emS race me La Quints Investment Advisory Board and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? wnar spectr,c attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work ,of�the La Quinta Investmey� Advisory Board? / cy'1 b�Cl/'tt�r Yt��P„� �o„/ 1/IPQ ll i/ !/PAS 1 L t Qu CabaC,% 5',t4s/1° PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION NO LATER THAN JUNE 15, 1998 TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 289 C JLN-04-2001` 14:59 RECEIVED ?^"' JUF -4 R, , 2: 55 CITY OF LA OUINTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF LA QUINTA ATTACHMENT 5-B APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD NAME: ' GYRILLE PIERRE MA11fOUP HOME ADDRESS: L M 0ESERT" N1 BUSINESS ADDRESS: 1-t6 . EowARo S -13493 611 Ill PQ_ Cti OV ql . TELEPHONE: (HOME) �60 36o q5 4a (BUSINESS, �6v IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS BOARD? Ye S Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic! involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. 290`: 0 APPLICATION, INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quints Investment Advisory Board. What specific issues or problems face the La Quints Investment Advisory Board and do you have any suggestions to address thosp issues or problems? r :.. r What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT TOTAL ATTACHMENT 5-C RECEIVED V"JAI MAY 16 FP: ;: 20 CITY 0- LA OUINTA CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CL_�K'S OFFICE Q"4 31 A Date APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD HOME ADDRESS: BUSINESS ADDRESS: Donald J. Moulin 78-863 Via Carmel La Quinta, CA 92253 None May 16, 2001 TELEPHONE: (HOME) (760) 564-1081 (BUSINESS) None IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: N/A LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 3 years and 10 months. HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS BOARD? Yes, IAB member since 7/1/98. Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. See qualifications attachment. 294 APPLICATION, INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board. • Three years of prior service qualifies me as knowledgeable of the functions, regulations and procedures of the IAB. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? • In my June 1998 application to serve on the IAB, I commented that the Investment Policy did not distinguish between U.S. Treasuries that are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government and the securities of U.S. agencies that do not have such backing. After joining the IAB, I collaborated with the other members and the City Treasurer to recommend changes to the Investment Policy to make it more risk sensitive, including the separation of the securities of GSEs not backed by the U.S. Government. The IAB is now recommending specific dollar investment limits on such GSE investments. • After joining the IAB, I realized that the actual functions of the IAB were not well described in the Investment Policy and the City Ordinance. I worked with the other members of the IAB and the Treasurer to recommend a change in the description of the functions in the Investment Policy and the City Ordinance that was adopted by the City Council. • I believe that the IAB is functioning well and appropriately addressing issues as they arise. The members of the IAB and the City Treasurer review on an on -going basis the risk of the City's investments and make recommendations when changes are advisable. An example is the reconsideration of the investment limits with regard to LAIF. What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board? • A thirty-four year public accounting career using technical and inter -personal skills having a foundation based upon competence, discipline, performance, client satisfaction, integrity and ethics. Included evaluation of organizations' cash management and investment policies and the internal and external controls over these activities. Also, experienced in public offerings of securities by governmental bodies. • Government executive and administrative experience through service as Chief Deputy Savings and Loan Commissioner for the State of California providing an understanding of the responsibilities, obligations and limitations of governmental bodies. • Personal experience directing, overseeing and evaluating performance of cash management and investment activities, including volunteer service as Treasurer of the Rotary Foundation of Washington, D.C., having a multi -million dollar portfolio in several funds, and as Treasurer of the Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Washington, a $10 million operation. • Personal commitment to serve La Quinta -- my community! PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 293 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT QUALIFICATIONS OF DONALD I MOULIN, CPA, FOR A POSITION OF MEMBER OF THE LA QUINTA INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD 78-863 Via Carmel La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 564-1081 Retired senior partner of international accounting and consulting firm possessing strong interpersonal skills and experience in corporate governance, financial controls, fiscal reporting and ethics. EXECUTIVE LEVEL PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE SENIOR KPMG PEAT MARWICK, WASHINGTON, D.C.,1979-1991. TECHNICAL Served as partner -in -charge of professional practice, liaison partner PARTNER to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), vice chairman of SEC Reviewing Partners Committee, and an audit engagement partner. • Developed financial oversight policies for boards of directors. • Reviewed and recommended improvements in accounting. • Resolved financial, audit and filing issues with the SEC and other governmental agencies. RESOURCE KPMG PEAT MARWICK, NEW YORK CITY, 1976-1979. PARTNER Researched and responded to technical accounting and auditing questions as partner in the office advisory group of the department of professional practice -professional standards and quality assurance in Peat Marwick's executive office. • Directed preparation and publication of Peat Marwick's booklet - "The Audit Committee". CHIEF STATE OF CALIFORNIA,1%9-1971. DEPUTY Appointed chief deputy savings and loan commissioner by COMMISSIONER Governor Ronald Reagan. Directed administration of department of savings and loan, including annual budgets and control over expenditures. Supervised department's oversight and resolution of problems of troubled financial institutions. PROFESSIONAL SPEECHES AND PUBLICATIONS Presented papers to professional bodies including the Annual Conference of the International Organization of Securities Commissions, Annual Conference on Current SEC Developments of the AICPA, the Corporate Financial Management Conference of the NAA, the Annual Meeting of American Accounting Association, and International CFO Institutional Investor Seminar. PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE AFFILIATIONS Served in leadership and membership positions in American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, CPA societies in California, New York and District of Columbia, American Accounting Association, Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Washington and Rotary Clubs of Washington, New York, and San Francisco. EDUCATION BACHELOR University of California -Berkeley, 1954. OF SCIENCE Majored in business administration with emphasis in corporate finance, personnel management and industrial relations. EXECUTIVE Attended Peat Marwick sponsored executive education programs. GRADUATE - Stanford Business School, 1974 and 1987. PROGRAMS - Harvard Business School, 1978. - J. L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management, 1983. 294 r; 4 ATTAI IRACKM e r Date'Juaf,R EJQ Ew6b I CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY J; L. QUI.-JA CITY CL N; 'S OFFICE APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD NAME: HOME ADDRESS: 6S5 1 4- IT L_,. �:2 ,,rev-. BUSINESS ADDRESS: 4:�ppn8 TELEPHONE: (HOME) 7(0o - S(e 4- - I S S -7 (BUSINESS) ('7 A S I IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: '?,-r 1 zA.M ,. tiva eF M ^VL&u Zeo 1 A ; AG.'E 4.1 :1_ L'es c lrnkqc e6- LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN L QUINTA: I HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS BOARD? is a Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. I'' 2n 4 E.e(ts - �s�,A, a oo Fes.-7•�.� nnn cS s I •� <- - u P A.t AnMa� nC Lr S*1 s Z E nn s - M rm , soaJ W-A ca.,r, N 11! 7 - 1 , - MK9'C� _ " SC44.� z w -�' '- 4a M i .�, 1 q'72 - 1 5 7 7 L-16 XAM T (�v % V pr�.0 F-kOMS%3.i Wi/1_ , � Aiw 4LA \ CA- 1 J l.I E.P(L r — r jr ERPc- E I S e- (T,2+ c LA_ - PF�,�n , CA ( I It, *-r VZ4 0% y 6t11A tna (, v r 4^.WACi,4 ^w, Z Y &-A" T-6s - p4, A . A. • z ' >� c., ac, t�,.11 � •. .� 4i I k c�c .-Tso 11 � 299t;5 APPLICATION, INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta'lnvestment Advisory Board. 6.) %.,o , .A What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO 296 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT ATTACHMENT 5-D RECEIVED Date Snla 5 2mI JUtd -S Pi. Iz: S s C I T Y 0,= aUl+CTWY OF LA QUINTA CITY ^! F= ;'S OFFICE APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD NAME:t3Ee1� HOME ADDRESS: %q 3ev 5(gwA V 15TA BUSINESS ADDRESS: —72 • `ff(o 6(. PA TELEPHONE: (HOME) _ 2tt� — i 9/G, (BUSINESS) ? 7 ( IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: i InJ) 1d ,0 _ > . . LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS BOARD? Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. o natty->�nnY� . J A ,^ 1 aQ ��� • it 1 9v ail � •, , � Sig /_ /_ /�ii � • _' �/� � � _i, � AffVA. Alm Ar 7 APPLICATION, INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board. M / *4 �rvL�v��- -f4F //J✓�Ar vts�i I—r/��Ti >m Or AGGIJl�t t' fits /4�. :!Vf 6 22k:11fdD J Al y 21-�CE- What specific issues or �problemsIface the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? ,. rZl� i!r r l B1/ ✓1 ZlaLt6 '"f LFi �dll/nl.c'✓Id� A w,/.l �/J,�I '..2- w n i. L. .�. What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have whit wou d enhance the work of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board? 5i pPC5 "( , 6,3 rnSDW &i2ADUA-M 36PifS (!!: : LVMP dm PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: RVRF--MW?Lr PIeWNt)Y CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 298 ATTACHMENT 5-F R E C E I Date101 ..1,1-7 PH 2: 3U NTA CITY OF LA QUINTA J=FICE APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD NAME: �? �L,i l k k k-+6\- e<< HOME ADDRESS: `(�i �1 S Rcxkncho I , Q uLv,-tC-- Lp. Qu e� �, 22s 3 BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (HOME) -I (001 6(o4 - cj'7 '-{ Z (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: Ja tie c.v s HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS BOARD? NU Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. 1'\ay.scec.'C4 C'�eco u i;� ` PD Ssed tv-p- CPA \Cibc1 avd OLIO des q�tic4 ed a C°eV e d \-kMVQ�C. Pht/lnL4r.-L�L� Wock p eCou,Vtu Co ►-laAQa 4r C�0 ass ��o tit COW I vk_I sak v -� � w ACC ski l li(M fi^usi (-Levlc t.bNN - IA mod . I U-� s .re s Pins: lt_ �rto�V'L113 �0rl�Is av�C� �Mu�t k �nicahc us u�l o side GuC ��:� k� tv� and cS+e,,- D-"VIV.� WG S ak CsD he spot'\ c t 6-f' Y5-" c'o-Sk ..tlau.4 �me av'a CpuetOP�V-S :AW OAkV-n\,� rn iS e C(Jej 'aft �P�nd�e.to av�, V�av� c � 0.vta.Sys �s , 299,,�9 APPLICATION, INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board. 1Lee(- T}1y_ �UiS6?tA 'Y� \0-tz, 1c9 QNd 1140n krn,�WIAc h el, ash t'17ilf5hY)vnt X/7G''l / �r ,` ?/1 M CifCr; 4 /i .�rn�;»„ 7r, 7A, /L„ Tan What specific_ issues or problems face the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? Vie GYI What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have whichuwould enhance t e work of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board? J a. �'�d' ,�a� �n��r�Ccc�r �),yh ass,t az&rn . a gitct 7 Ciey c s crresfin��. �✓2.�2aW'�'.-WOu.lc! �� Q G-rLti�a-C-rc. LiC�'C4fzi7.. � �/,1Cv��l.� PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT ATTACHMENT 6-A DM Silc„,)i CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: Steve Robbins HOME ADDRESS: 78-365 Via Caliente (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: Post Office Box 1058, Coachella, California 92236 TELEPHONE: (HOME) (760) 360-7381 (BUSINESS) (760) 398-2651 IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: Coachella Valley Water District Assistant to the General Manager LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 10 vears HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? Yes Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. Please see attached resume for relevent education, work experience, civil and professional involvement. In addition to the items noted in my resume, I was also appointed to the City of La Quinta Investment Policy Task Force in 1992 to look at the City's investment policies. My experience as an engineering consultant also gives me the perspective from an applicant's view. I have previously processed many projects through the system, including PGA West's initial approvals in the 1980s. i(1 APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of.the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Planning Commission. I have been a member of the La Quinta Planning Commission for three years, serving as the Vice Chairman and the Chairman. The Planning Commission reviews projects for conformance with zoning ordinances, etc., and makes recommendations to the City Council. In some cases, Planning Commission decisions are the final step in portions of the development process. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? La Quinta is one of the fastest growing cities in the State. Balancing the existing quality of living of our residents with the pressures of new development is an ongoing challenge. The Highway 111 corridor is developing, bringing in long-term tax dollars. The Village is beginning to develop and may finally become a reality. Expansion of City boundaries to the east poses new challenges. The Planning Commission and City Council need to work together and with our citizens to manage this growth wisely. What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? Having lived in the Coachella Valley since 1978, I have seen La Quinta grow from a sleepy,unincorporated cove into one of the fastest growing cities in the State of California. My previous experience in devlopment, with Coachella Valley Water District community involvement and my experience on the Planning Commission give me a unique perspective that I believe is valuable to the Commission. La Quints really is "The Gem of the Desert." I have played a small part in making La Quinta what it is today and look forward to contributing in the future. PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK- YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT r Resume Steven B. Robbins P.E. Assistant to the General Manager Coachella Valley Water District Education Bachelor of Science in Engineering; University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, June 1976 Registration California Civil Engineering Certificate C-33486 Experience February 2000 to Present Assistant to the General Manager, Coachella Valley Water District Responsible to the General Manager -Chief Engineer to administer programs or projects assigned by the General Manager -Chief Engineer and created by public need, community expansion and/or resource availability. In the absence of the General Manager -Chief Engineer, carries out management functions of the District including approval of personnel and disciplinary actions, reviews and approves engineering drawings, presents Board agenda items and acts for the General Manager -Chief Engineer in the operation and conduct of District business. Assists in, the development of policies programs and budgets necessary for the operation of the District, development of long range plans covering essential elements of operations, facilities, finances and personnel, negotiation of contracts including labor relations and provides positive and constructive leadership and management. Represents the District in meetings and discussions with employees, customers, the public, governmental officials and contractors in order to promote the District's goals and objectives and resolve issues. Acts as a hearing officer during confidential grievance hearings. February 1994 to February 2000 Assistant Director of Engineering, Coachella Valley Water District Under general direction assist the Director of Engineering in overall supervision of a 44-person multi - disciplined engineering department responsible for irrigation, drainage, sanitation domestic water, stormwater, water conservation, groundwater recharge and water quality laboratory. Responsible for capital, equipment, and personnel budget. Responsible for preparation of plans and specifications and for construction management of domestic water capital improvements including wells, reservoirs, pipelines and booster stations. Responsible for preparation of plans and specifications and for construction management of sewer construction programs. Responsible for preparation of the district's Coachella Valley Water Management Plan. Provided technical support to the General Manager regarding Colorado River quantification negotiations. Assisted in negotiation with The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California regarding transfer of State Water Project entitlements to the District. Represented the District in meetings and coordinated with nine cities, two counties, State and Federal Agencies, other water agencies and the public. December 1994 to February 1994 Vice President/Principal, Engineering Service Corporation — Palm Desert, CA Responsible for the overall management of the Palm Desert Office of Engineering Service Corporation including administrative coordination with corporate offices in Los Angeles and development of short 30 7� Resume — Steven B. Robbins P.E. and long range business plans. Supervised a design staff of up to 35 registered engineers, designers, drafters and surveyors. Typical plans prepared under direct supervision included water, sewer, street, stormdrain, grading and subdivision maps. Represented clients and made presentations to regulatory agencies, governmental bodies, etc. Advised clients on laws, local ordinances, governmental agency policies, etc. relative to development of major land development projects. Administer consulting services contracts with individual contracts valued in excess of $2,000,000. Acted as project manager with direct design and client coordination responsibilities for major residential/resort projects in the Coachella Valley. July 1983 to December 1984 Domestic Water Engineer, Coachella Valley Water District Responsible for all domestic water activities of the District including preliminary and final design coordination with consulting engineers. Responsible for design and construction supervision of the District's approximately $3,000,000 per year domestic capital improvement budget consisting of pipelines, wells, reservoirs and booster stations. Applied for, received and administered several Housing and Urban Development grants for improvements to substandard water systems. June 1978 to July 1983 Assistant Domestic Water Engineer, Coachella Valley Water District Under direction of the Domestic Water Engineer, responsible for domestic water activities of the District including preliminary and final design coordination with consulting engineers. Responsible for design and construction supervision of the District's domestic capital improvement budget consisting of pipelines, wells, reservoirs and booster stations. Other Professional Involvements Board Member, Desert Chapter of the Building Industry Association, 1995 - Present Executive Committee, Desert Chapter of the Building Industry Association, 1999 State Director, Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of California, 1986 - 1994 Professional Affiliations American Water Works Association Water pollution Control Federation Association of California Water Agencies California Water Pollution Control Association Civic Activities Rotary Club of La Quinta, President 2001-2002 Member, La Quinta Planning Commission, 1998 - Present National Water Well Association Water Environment Federation Vice Chairman, La Quinta Planning Commission, 1999 - 2000 Chairman, La Quinta Planning Commission, 2000 - Present Publications Co-authored Economic Benefits of Recharging Aquifers with Colorado River Water, presented to the 26th Annual Water Resources Planning and Management Conference, in Tempe, Arizona in 1999. 304 ATTACHMENT 6-B RECEIVED Dre, i Ma 30,2001 JU,% So CITY �F 1-4 QUINTA CITY CLEFZi;'S OFFICE CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: Richard Butler HOME ADDRESS: 44180 Ocotillo Drive La Quinta, CA. 92253 BUSINESS ADDRESS: Same as Above TELEPHONE: (HOME) 760 360-6801 (BUSINESS) 760 345-1626 EMPLOYMENT: Real estate sales, new home subdivision " Sonrisa" LENTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 11 years HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION: Yes Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. I was born in San Francisco and raised in San Diego, California. I graduated from San Diego State University with a B.S. in Business Administration. I have been a self- employed insurance agent for 32 years with emphasis in commercial property and casualty insurance. I am presently a licensed real estate agent and working in new home sales in La Quinta. I served on the Board of Directors for the YMCA Palm Desert, the Boys and Girls Club of La Quinta, Building Horizons, Past President of San Diego Leukemia Society, and six years on the La Quinta Planning Commission and 1 year as Chairman of same, I was also involved in La Quinta Rotary. I am married and both my wife and I each bring two children to our marriage. All of our children are grown. Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Planning Commission. As a member of the Commission for 6 years and the Chairman for I year, I have received excellent training and education on the above. I have attended the League of California Cities annual seminars for the last 6 years and attended seminars in general plans, zoning, subdivision map act, legal updates and CEQA. 305 -5 APPLICATION, PLANNING PAGE What specific issues or problems face the La Quints Planning Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? The most important issues facing La Quinta are the following: Development of the Village area, Highway I I I corridor, Washington Street development, annexation of additional land into the City to help us grow, a municipal golf course for the citizens of La Quinta, and complete and add community parks for our youth. The approach I think is best for La Quinta is to balance quality residential and commercial growth for the long term. What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? I have a desire to see La Quinta be the best City in the Coachella Valley. I have a background in business and am involved in the community. PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION NO LATER THAN JUNE 5, 2001 TO: CITY CLERK P.O. BOX 1504 LA QUINTA, CA. 92253 306 76 ATTACHMENT 6-C CITY OF LA QUINTA Date o 1 22DI MAY 24 P,'; 12: 2-- CITY Gr LA CUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE CITY CLER;;'S OFFICE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME:_ --�)Ay L i IZo NC C r- HOME ADDRESS: 5 y t q -t\J C- Q i A A V A o (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: -79 - `I 9 cl Co u u z 2 y C L u g :I:V 9 E3 E 2wlu A bu toE TELEPHONE: (HOME) S (.4 - 3 7 4 7 (BUSINESS) 2 19 - (.'Sg g IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LOu(F1)) ��ul ST�LoNECAf3jnJC--TMW LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: Q MouTH G HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? y r s Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. 1944-191.& -U S, 0\2M 196&' jy77 ` TELEELaRA IrjC• - C PEr_q-f, oti S M G 2, Iy'l7- (98+6- 50u'tN $AI &FFsCE Su!'Pcy Co. - OWNF2/oAGQ, Icki(6- 19 86 -- 1<ENT LAND5BrK(r, CD, - 1),VibIoAi jL,1CR ICi ?&66E&)T - 6;6N'L. CON T2ACTo/l/Cu5ToAx ro&r1, t CAB,NC-T_MAKEfL SELF CMf��oyEDl I'183-1g95- -PLANN,4CG CoAA i,o/J C-,2 - t{E �9 1943 - 199'1 - PLAA',it Y6: CoM MI 5SI OM6 ( - I#J �,An, uiFLL< rA 1994- 1Ccab- Mks M86P- COACNGLLA VALLry 7KA9L5 Co0NCIL 77 APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Planninc Commission. NONE W,TtN LN (QurSpEcIFie ALuy — ATTEN"bE1 f',NIJU&L 5EM,n3APS W141LE A ComoAtss,oNr� WITH goTH IAC-A0Ao5A BEAc.lk ANC IN� AIJ (WELLS F"AN.tL,A2 WITIA F0*3C71aA'�5 REGuLA-r o,k)S t 120CE"RC5 OF ?I,ANIJ, 11)G COILAM.I551o4S (A� 6EIJt2Ac What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? LA Qu, ,vT,A 1-IRS 1?k06ABLH E MoS-f E)rCI T,n1G. 1"Eu�u2,= OF P"uy CtT4 I/J Out JALtEy, WITH TI4E �oygLE ?6PuLA7roQ FjZont TC/.1 Q LF A25 AGo —in Tt+r �\W,SOA1L -FuTuP-G Po E1JT,AL WE MUST 06 Vr/Ly CkfL FuL OF "bl2ECT,ofJS -MG C1T4 TAI4ES (HE VuZL)" 1A0L-")5 C5,F2ocJ7l-i IrJ 517ZC BL`b•_I.ScS5 $' L oP(_C What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? �XFE2'ENcC IfS W02lcIiJa Ohl )LAN/J„JG Ccmp,\ISS(oI k►Jvwi_c l�C, �' prr MiarJ'I CITY Cob E< CAS !?EAD L)k) 2STr,NIb PLANc' I Du)G5 /►tiAPS. GOoa NCC'oC.ATc/�- Leiy E `CH i S C 1T--1 ( PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT EM i ATTACHMENT 6-D RECEIVEp Date -24-o( f[di CITY OF L 4 QUIr1 OF LAQUMA CITY CLERK S QAICATIONTOSERVE ON LA QUINTA ekl5n=kL ARM COMMISSION NAME: \\ l G/C �• �-prr�T2- HOME ADDRESS: 747 20 4�*,-L c Sr. pia (1�t ,;,k CA 4• ZZ r (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: jpR w� TELEPHONE: (HOME) 17 ( - A 7o (BUSINESS) 777 - 9 9 / 7 IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: ------ LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: doia lk'Fr woe*) P- Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background.. Please be sure to include /experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. AA - NptIZ.KETING /Its Li�t� Sc �WPS4QV0 U, d. y�� (fps► J__Fz-e'+'Oy 1`k �(sk '? `(U- I L LA(4.4('f1 i A-Qr\ '" 7?—'ar �v�unrt�tPApA, 4�-e4 Arf-9 (S(o1u -t >?,,.A' �C)rt A �%C11 �n �6ec, 'X {�-t)VAC ( Cflf�) - !'EiJO✓ '�-�i,� COur'>= VP D2 caflEur C4Wr.,J VI ' M"n r" Sir 309 ✓iw G'U✓t APPLICATION, eNtU911111ift ARM COMMISSION PAGE 2 R4AhNI„ I(? Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quints Cultural Arts Commission. What specific issues or problems face the La Quints Cultural Arts Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? o— 0P What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quints Cultural Arts Commission? C r k(-j AAe, re (; .4. h _ 1 'E�, &,, . N t J c. L ,, , A— is t4o�-A- . - -- , . "Pe W v llev. , e J O.J' -� tIP�✓(.+ 4S 6— ►-,-.lc._�s Sb) //`�4 eJ IuvAi,xr/y(�� PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 310 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT , ': Q ATTACHMENT 6-E DGClVEr 7nniMAY 27 A!,i� zI. i CrrY OF LA QUINTA CITY 0= L A GUI4T A APPLICATION TO SERVE CITY CLER., 5 OFFICE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: Roderic'c L. Ro;; er HOME ADDRESS. -Ic10 Avenida Juarez, La �uinta, Cal. 3,2253 (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: N /A TELEPHONE: (HOME) (760) 771-1 cc 4 (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: 1\ /H LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: two and a h--' f ears HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? Ao Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. Graduate of the University of So. Calif. with. degree of Zachelor Architecture (1941) P-rtrer in arc:itecturai firm riiller, hoyer and Rite, Eeverly rills, rest ned in 195 :.em-er of t::e Huntincton teach Planning C=.7.i ssion 9/19/oc to 9/3/68. University of Cal'fornia Extensior. - Division of Social services, Cert'_ficate In CorTur.'_ty Planning Processes for I:provina Local Urban Environment, (.linter 1966) Associate T.emter of the So. Cal. Chapter of t"e A.I.A., July 1961. :'.emter of the U.S.C. Arch. Guild and member of t`_e L'.S.C. Alumni Association of the Desert. 311 APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Planni Commission. I'have no knowledge of the functions of the La G,uinta Plarninc Commission, other than that I a= familiar with the purpose, the reasons and the o7eration and conduction of a n1arr7nc comTission which serves the cite ccuncil, because of my prev!ous experience as a plannina commissioner. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have al suggestions to address those issues or problems? Not familiar enough to comment at this time. What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance tl work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? Only my aforementioned experience and education PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 312 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT V i � r ATTACHMENT 6-F RECEIVED 2"°! JL?1 -4 P1;12 C2 CITY G? L: QUINTA CITY CLEZ;;'S OFFICE Crry OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO STAVE ON' L1 Q[JINTA PLANNING COMML4.SION James C. Booth NAN[E: _ HOME ADDRESS: 78-865 Meridian Way, La Quinta Ca. 92253 (Must be a Ld Quinw resident and eHok to Yore in the tatty.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: None TFLEPHoNE: momE) 760/360-4957 _ (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE Y OU WORK .AND POSMON YOU HOLD: _ Retired -Attorney At Law LENGTH OF RRSIDENCE 1N LA QUINTA: 2 1 /2 years _ HAVIS YOU EVER ATrM- DED A %IEF1'ING OF THIS COMMISSION? Yes Biographical sketch, includin); educauen, work experience. civic involvement and other background. Please he sure to mcludc experienecs rclevam to Julies of the position yvw seek. Graduate of Univ, of Mich.-B.Blm An 1955 noctorate_of.Law-3964, Practiced Law 1961-00,39 years in Orange Co., Licensed in Ca. and Michigan (inactive).20 yrs. Certified Family Law Specialist Certified to U.S. Su reme Court. Ca._Supreme Court, Councilman_and-Virg Mayor City of Stanton ('65-'70)• Assist City Attorney Citypf WWstminstet_ (Attorney for Planning CommissioniCi Pr utQL-City of Costa Mes ('70's); Active Member many Professional Organizations (Or. Co. Bar, Ca. TrialLawyers) _Board of Directors Orange C. Bar; -jqdge Pr Orange Co. Superior Court. 313 �3 APPLICATION, PLANNING CCMhMSSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge o' the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Planning mion. stavemiss served as Assist. ci Attotney and Legal Counselor to the Plannino What specific issues or problers face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? The explosion of population will continue to present numerous issues reaan balanced planning and development. Such challenges will continue to reoui assistanceto the council in reviewing and developing a considered General Master Plan best serving the goals and future interests of the city. What sVecifir. attitudes, skills znd;or experise do YOU think you have which would enhance the work of the La Ouinta Planning Commission' See above. I am now retired and feel I have the necessary time to offer the benefit of my background experience and training to my_.eommuni _ I prPse myself unencumbered by any political or commercial interest, obligation or ffiliation. I am willing. to -listen.-and learn. PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CIT`r' CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TANIPICO LA OUINTA. CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YC UR WILLINGNESS TO SFRVF YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT irk ow - 314 s4 ATTACHMENT 6-G RECEIVED ?nni U., _4 PI: h: Q? CITY 0"'-A QUINTA CITY C! ER;;'S OFFICE Date MM A� 01 CITY OF LA QuiNTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: lull CAI kEL y3, ZE c.Ln rzz HOME ADDRESS: 1 I ILO CA 14TIVA2 A "n2.1 UE 1 _ ice. (Must be a la Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS TELEPHONE: (HOME) V 4 0 )")i Z. - 0410 (BusINFss) ..wa. IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: _4 7 VQ'Sm fL 3 M L7 S . HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? OO Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. .7 w&s Ili NL7qulty 04 104E 1133, 1Q 1146 I whoa TH&JIN.Amm) TV NF.tDEL.'B1=12�,,G�Q�IArJy VJNE>:E A'ITs0.rgfl. r a1 r St'NooL. I95,T TNa.V I r7 SCIA- RI<E-0 114 TN{E V.SAAVY, Ig3? T 9y 1 q`17 I a+A,s T'eg5 j(Ze 0. U1S N �� a w0e.k Se"JaL's N���TtT�►L3, OPtJBWC t�Q?Los zroWon, �I.L toED ay A!E . E i!s APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Planni Commission. NOT FAh11LIA2 1D,T 'P��SBI�'!'• What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have a suggestions to address those issues or problems? 14%*rT A .M A IXE OF I4A o, $y T UJ 1 L-L A VVXZS s & 3y GGE..2'T SIO l.y 'PI 01JS 144 A NISM YSEA! AS Thl*y ac+ ooyk- What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance t work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? 4EjkRS e1F C.04Son CX OPJZIANQ.0' Jl=.ray INIG IN tAjkoq Cx-PAG TIES IA ihCLV C.o1.1 MaTinfas . IF `IRS. n, Two-rd2 of TAIsr I NA1CT�e�. T'1t�3TS . PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 31G THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT „i 8 ATTACHMENT 6-H RECEIVED Ju,l -4 Pt;12: Q 1 CITY Or 0WITA CI7 Y CLc,',Y.'S OFFICE Date June 1. 2001 CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: Mervyn E. Kirshner HOME ADDRESS: 54063 Southern Hills. La Quince, CA 92253 (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: 13-733 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 110, Palm Desert, CA 92260 TELEPHONE: (HOME) (760) 771-0274 (BUSINESS) (760) 773-2432 IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: Colliers Seeley, Managing Director LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: Part time since 1989, Full time since June, HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? Yes Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. Please see attachment, item BIO (I have also included an additional BIO) 31 APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Planninc Commission. Please see attachment. item 111 What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have anN suggestions to address those issues or problems? Please see attachment, item #2 What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? Please see attachment, item #3 PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 431 H P�� BIOGRAPHY Mervyn Kirshner returned to Colliers Seeley in August of 2000. During his previous association with Seeley, he was Salesman of the Year for seven consecutive years, from 1983 —1989, 1995, 1996 and 1998 received the Cushman & Wakefield Management Achievement Award. Cushman and Wakefield Top 100 in 1996. Merv's broad array of commercial and industrial expertise encompasses locating major sites, representation of national companies, acting as a principal in real estate development, owner representation in lease and sales transactions, sales of investment properties and consultation on complex real estate transactions. Mery directs the commercial, industrial and an array of real estate Colliers-Seeley's Palm Springs/Coachella area operation. Mery has 37 years in Real Estate Brokerage and Development Experience. Business activities in which Mr. Kirshner has been involved include representing national companies, counseling and solving real estate problems, working with developers, finding major sites, representing owners as leasing and sales agent, the sale of investment properties, and in individual real estate development acting as a principal. Mr. Kirshner's outside activities include being named President of the Society of Industrial and Office Realtors (SIOR) in 1991. He was also a past President of the South California Chapter of the SIOR, a recipient of the Roy C. Seeley Award for Excellence by the Southern California Chapter and was active nationally as a member of the board of Directors of the National Association of Realtors (NAR), was Vice Chairman of Education Committee for SIOR, and an instructor of the Marketing Portion of SIOR Course 1, which is given nationally a number of times each year. He was also an Instructor of the Industrial Real Estate Association, and holds the Designation of Master of Industrial Real Estate. He is a Past Director of the Los Angeles Realty Board, as a Past Director of the California Real Estate Association. In addition to real estate organizations, Mr. Kirshner was an active member of the City of Los Angeles' City Economic Council and the Parking Management Steering Committee. He was a member of the Board of Directors of Commuter Computer, and was appointed by Mayor Tom Bradley to the Los Angeles Local Development Corporation, which was formed to issue debentures in order to increase the City's capacity to provide long-term financing for small business expansion. Mr. Kirshner is a graduate of the University of Southern California, and is an officer in the United States Naval Reserve. Mery resides in La Quinta, California with his wife Darlene. 319 73 L-ICI I have been involved in Real Estate Activities since 1962 working for a Developer, attending Planning and City Council Meetings in cities all over Southern California. I have run a public Real Estate Development Company, dealing with planning, zoning, site plan layout and development. In Real Estate Brokerage, I have represented owners, users of space and appeared many times before planning commission and active council hearings. I have represented projects, intended uses of properties. My past experience include National President of the Society of Industrial and Office Realtors in 1991, speaking engagements throughout the United States and appearing as an expert witness before United States Congressional sub -committee meetings. I am a member the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce. I have developed property in the Coachella Valley in the unincorporated county area. have built commercial buildings and owned buildings as a landlord with a number of major tenancies. My background is one of empathy for an owner and a tenant and by recognizing the Municipality requirements to enforce regulations and obtain quality products. Item #1 The Planning Commission relates to the overall general plan, regulations, zoning requirements of the City of La Quinta, meeting on the 2nd and 4 Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. The Planning Commission hears a myriad of requests it is important for the Planning Commission to review the matters that are presented in a timely manner and for the members to be aware of information that is sent to them and physically inspect properties prior to attending the meeting and understand the various viewpoints and recommendations of staff and reach a decision. Item #2 The issues that face our Planning Commission is the incredible growth of the City of La Quinta and ways of preserving the appeal of what we have grown to love yet at the same time recognizing the benefit of growth and overall what it will mean to the community. The best ways to understand these issues is to be active in the community, listen to what the constituents say and help to make the City stronger economically as well as esthetically. Item #3 It is important to have a positive attitude, understanding that growth is not a "bad" thing if properly handled. It is also important to understand that developers cannot take over a community or take over cities and that they must adhere to the rules and regulations or both. My background enables me to understand the way developers think and will help in dealing with them. It also helps to understand things developers can and cannot do when imposing restrictions or regulations upon them. It is very important to recognize projects ,3 n that are very positive for the City and be supportive of those. It is just as important to �- - recognize projects that are negative for the City and to set forward a position that rejects them. , i q n ATTACHMENT 6-1 RECIEIVEG -j Fti 3: 49 CITY ^0';A =NTA CIT" CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: D b c- r� C\) o A J e %J HOME ADDRESS: 5 3`} !aAQ, n J o J wr"'a (Must be a La Quints resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: a�� TELEPHONE: (HOME) (,v le 4= 198 °1 (BUSINESS) ? l�o -� I . S4 S `{. IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: 2 Lo LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? P� G ' Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. Ca1lQ-, t . (JLA-a W--00aD (;) w -7Z7r� � 5 � t , . \ 4Z L - 5 S �A 321 !3t APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Plann Commission. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have a suggestions to address those issues or problems? (' LJO What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance t work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT ,, .. ATTACHMENT 6-J RECEIVED Pn 3 53 CITY X- L ,, C U I N T A CITY OF LA QUINTA C I T Y C_-r^ !; ' S 0 F F I C E APPLICATION TO SERVE ON Date LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: 5 /G N Y HOME ADDRESS: (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: %t� i i—jZ- TELEPHONE:(HOMEX2/,-, 7/-/` (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: /. 3 /-- HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. rx rc. _6 j.r 1L- I ram. 1 F'-r= 72 /1'S f / L .= i�'.—) T i �r t.- , C-«.- /{-i�-3 /- y , 'f. I-r 1C r7 — /' I ='-, - P- %/.ter 323 -33 APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Plann, Commission. phi.! i r i+..-1 , r . < -r _ l•7-+.- TTn, What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have ar suggestions to address those issues or problems? i•rFH- ( IZ . �I� /;i- Lei% ;t l _ 7 r-C r\ "r �•i. . rJ �._� �Yt�. 'A r.'L ✓t.= �� —•i c 1>, L •> -' ..J i.. - -7 rlr ! i 7 Z A,r1.ti-i✓'i'c�c7 � �,h,/S :�r an.•v,... c. • c-r /irr .?fir__ 1.0 �i, �: �i-/� f � h 17,✓.. i l._% l_)� b - G"4�- " �r� N/at spec flc attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance tl work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? 7.t n I G.-�N:- •/'c c_% �.,:v�i 55. i r 'r.� T tea =; �z°— _ 1/ — > •/ Y:'� —: r-f-.. _ it S /✓' c C i),=� i •ni i -�� ? G.- r 7 7a„rri_.�..v t• r,4 a : ,. C.{ _.'.T/ �J = T'"� �l ��._ cy / PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT ., .3nil 4-I. THOMAS A. GORNEY 49-893 Via Katalina La Quinta, CA 92253 QUALIFICATIONS (760) 771-1502 A strong record of consistent success in the information technology field with special accomplishments in strategic planning and executive leadership of software development and service delivery. Experienced in managing other key functions, including human resources, communications, education, facilities and administration. CAREER HISTORY AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS DPI and DPI SERVICES 1995 1999 DPI is a non-profit organization with a mission to enable people with disabilities for careers in the information technology field. DPI SERVICES, a wholly owned subsidiary of DPI, develops and markets quality software applications and provides consulting programming services throughout California. The earnings from DPI Services are used to fund the mission of DPI. President / CEO Responsible as the Chief Executive for all aspects of both DPI SERVICES and DPI. • Upon assuming President/CEO responsibilities and recognizing that the business could not grow beyond the current level due to under capitalization, developed a strategy to divest the DPI SERVICES business to enable the DPI mission to survive. Identified and negotiated the sell of the contract programming services business of DPI SERVICES to a large, publicly traded corporation. Identified and negotiated the sell of the application development and support organization of DPI SERVICES to a large worldwide organization. These actions ultimately eliminated DPI Services as a going business and created an endowment to totally fund the DPI non-profit forever. • Completely reoriented the DPI Mission to focus on providing assistance to people with disabilities in gaining access to computer technology by establishing a computer access technology lab and by providing the mentoring and education necessary for them to start a career in information technology. Resigned this position in December 1999. ROLM. A SIEMENS COMPANY 1989 1994 ROLM, a wholly owned subsidiary of SIEMENS, AG, is a leader in the development and sales of private computerized telephone and voice messaging systems. Vice President -Information & Telecommunication Systems (1992-1994) Responsible, as the chief information executive, for the establishment of all corporate policies related to information and telecommunication services and the definition, development and delivery of these services to all of ROLM in North America. • Achieved major improvements in organizational efficiencies by consolidating multiple organizations into one. This achieved a 45% reduction of yearly operational expenses while fully maintaining the quality of service delivery. • Conceived and guided the design and successful implementation of a significant private multi - protocol network that linked all 35 ROLM locations in North America. • Conducted a review of the ROLM business process that led to a detailed 3 year plan to migrate key business applications from a mainframe environment to a client -server environment Vice President of Operations (1989-1992) Responsible for the integration of ROLM into the SIEMENS company with direct responsibility for information and telecommunication systems, application development, security, environmental health and safety, administrative services, and facilities. • Defined and implemented a plan for ROLM to continue to conduct business while eliminating the over 900 dependencies that ROLM had on IBM, the previous owner. 32, �195 THOMAS A. GORNEY - Page Two INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES 1962-1989 Director of Management Ser Am (1988-1989) Responsible for the integration of ROLM into the IBM infrastructure. Direct responsibility for information and telecommunication systems, application development, human resources, communications, education, environmental health, security, administrative services, and facilities. • Strengthened, consolidated and improved the overall Management Services organization thus enabling an 180/a resource reduction within 6 months of assuming responsibility. • Played a key role in the contract negotiations between IBM and SIEMENS in the sale of ROLM. Site General Manager - Menlo Park (1986-1988) Responsible for all aspects of the IBM Menlo Park Application Development Laboratory, a software development location consisting of approximately 250 professional software developers. • Overcame significant resistance and upgraded the product set such that within approximately 12 months time, the Menlo Park laboratory was recognized as the IBM competency center for knowledge based systems and query management systems. Manager of Information Systems (1983-1986) Responsible for providing all information services to the Santa Teresa Laboratory which consisted of 2000 professionals requiring high quality on-line system access. • Improved the overall performance of all systems from 95% availability to 99.5% availability. • Planned and implemented the complete redesign of the data center and the construction thereof. • Established a very sophisticated chargeback system that enabled the costs of the information services to be correctly charged to the users for the first time. Program Manager (1968-1983) Responsible for the development of various IBM Software Products. Managed an extensive quality oriented development effort on the IBM Information Management System (IMS) and met the objective of significantly reducing the number of problems, enabling IBM customers to build their business databases on the IMS product. Managed the design and development of numerous IBM corporate financial systems covering financial planning, cost estimating, accounts payable, and purchasing. Managed the design and development of IBM's initial text processing system. Personally designed and developed key processes to enable the formatting of multi -column pages and the justification of text within the columns. Earlier Career — IBM (1962-1968) Positions of increasing responsibility in software product design and development. EDUCATION: B.S. Finance St. Vincent College, Latrobe, PA 1962 IBM Fundamental, Experienced and Advanced Management Schools; Executive Management Schools (PACE University, NY); Executive Business Decision Making (University of Virginia - MBA Program). 32G ;i36 ATTACHMENT 6-K Date JUNE 5, 2001 CrrY OF LA QuiNTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: DAVID C. THOMS HOME ADDRESS: 47-410 VIA CORDOVA - LA QUINTA, CA 92253 (Mug be a La Oufnta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: SAME TELEPHONE: (HOME) 760-564-5049 (BUSINESS) SAME IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSMON YOU HOLD: N/A LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 3 YEARS HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? YES Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. PLEASE SEE APPRNDIX A. '127 197 APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Planning Commission. THE PLANNING COMMISSION SHALL SERVE AT THE !•TILL OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO EXECUTE THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES AS OUTLINED IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING LAW, AND AS PRESCRIBED IN THE LA OUINTA ZONING ORDINANCE. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT, AT PRESENT, THERE ARE NO ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES. I BELIEVE IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION .PROCESS TO DEVELOP ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES THAT WOULD GIVE COMMISSION MPMBERS A STARTING POINT AS TO EVALUATING SPECIFIC PROJECTS. What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? I HAVE SERVED AS PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE OF SOME OF THE FIRM'S (EPT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE) MOST CHALLENGING WORK. I HAVE EXPERIENCE WITH PUBLIC AND SERVICE USE BUILDINGS AS !•TELL AS RESIDENTIAL TO!,JNHOUS7S. CONDOMINTUMS- AND SINGLE FAMILY PROJECTS. PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 3 2 f APPENDIX A DAVID C. THOMS, ASLA Principal EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture, California State Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo,1957. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: Member of the American Society of Landscape Architects since 1963. President of the Southern California Chapter of the American Society of Landscape Architects, 1972. President of South Pasadena Beautiful, 1976.1978. REGISTRATION: Licensed Landscape Architect, California #1032, Arizona#9347 The partnership of EPT was expanded when Mr. Thoms was promoted to Principal in 1966. His construction design and management expertise combined with 1nL, direct involvement in academic, professional and community service make him an invaluable team member. As Senior Principal, Mr. Thoms has been directly responsible for the following projects: • California State university - Northridge, Campus Landscape Architect/Master Planning • Loyola High School, Los Angeles • Roxbury Memorial Park Beverly Hills, Master Plan • Reeves Park Plaza, Beverly Hills • Lake Avenue Congregational Church, Pasadena • Santa Fe Dam Recreation Area, Irwindale • Northwood Elementary School, Irvine • Palm Springs Classic, Palm Springs • Harvey Mudd College - Claremont, Campus Landscape Architect/Master I'lanning • Claremont Colleges - Dartmouth Street Entrance Development • Westpark Planning Area 38 Park Three and Four 329 199 ATTACHMENT 6-L RECEIVED I"•' - l o:: 2: 3 0 �I_.; �'.�i'{TA CI ;'S OFFICE CITY OF LA QUINTA Date APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION HOME ADDRESS: -7q - O (n V l fq Cc-,+ a q (Must be a La Quints reside and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (HOME) 7 3 : 6 Ci _3 G 4 (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: G 4 2 S HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? N O Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. E4TT�N0f-b bP,2i .i oQ (-f C 0 t-I-f G L (3A DtrL IN56Al C.vL,LCuE C#+/Z-,l5Lf I"A E-IC�'07tVc TrLA,NtNG- 5Ck_Lj4) - Na-Cy 5 -P4STb,?-E A/ qS.z 2. ClsotzKcp ,�Aj «y i3�slrv��� ro�Rs. S c qQ--r (-ASa:aA! IMGLc (3JS Nc`SS SiVf2gL G Hc2 I�JSIAIESSES /1J'J 3 COM I)AA/ILS A-i DNCE, t{EL�i SivC��� �aS:Tion1-S rM f2-S N47roA.+ AS50C.�7NE-V WAS C"rWa--tA►J I. SO V(CE C(44,/7- /9- /�11riCNl£�S jWrf-anrA?UvA-i- ASSIy, ON 5sUtA.✓11. t3oA2A�, U/A-5 on! C C) O P i3 OFF 2D T O -rr4 (; n- S fr T L AI C C 5 w F v `< <✓ 1 t- (3OS(Nf5S L- tF'Z IN JOLq'� 6 W k TH 0EC(SIDtjs 02F pLRr W1A( APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Planning rnmmic¢inn What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? In O 01-KR PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 3 �nl ATTACHMENT 6-M RECEIVED Late MAY 2 CITY OF LA.OUINTA CITY OF LA UINTA CITY CLER:. S OFFICE Q APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: W/4111/4777 E. HOME ADDRESS: 7f- (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (HOME) 76,0 - i;7 /- PO Z* (BUSINESS) _ IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING F THIS COMMISSION? Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be surer to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. • /yS p &*" ass AVCAs _ — I&Y A6 C�✓h20 ��NA / 4 7 ,r�•�i "'„� szo " el..: 0, .. • ckl4t, /o a., w.• :.✓ s�•rf ; AJ.M., 'O'sn..Q /2rt':U� 90 3 ? 5�-�,,,,,.�u. tfn:�u-.,w� �'6dou:�(+'�.... C�»t✓,l(aJ G�a.� 1 ( y. APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Planninq What specific isUes or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? 612'evllo. J _ , What specific attitudes, skills and/or experti: work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? S) Ni you think you have which would enhance the OQ PLEASE ETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: (V) CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 3 3 .' ATTACHMENT 6-N RECEIVED ^I JU?; -8 PH 12,.34 _ r' I i,C. Date S /3,, 10c,7 i CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: M/;/<k 1 . D It) M c•/�/ HOME ADDRESS: � k-9r I i'/ C M Dc NPR L (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (HOME) 7 % / - `% 3 ? I (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? / > ScC c,n.c Uh Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. 334 104 APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Planning Commission. SEP i=a,cL (3 ) What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? E What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 335 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT ji)J 1 No, however, I have written to the community development department regarding some concerns I had in planning policy. I believe this was in August, 2000. 2 I am a retired naval officer. I have a Bachelor of Science Degree from Wayne State University, Detroit with majors in history and education. I also have a Master of Arts Degree in Political Science from the University of Wisconsin, Madison. During my career in the navy I served on several staffs that were directly related to planning and policy i.e., reserve training and planning policy boards and planning mobilization readiness and manpower requirements to meet national defense needs. While the goals and specifics differ between community and military planning, the fundamental human relationships, leadership abilities, creative instincts and team cooperation are indeed similar. In addition, I worked for the State of Wisconsin after my naval career and am familiar, if not an expert, in the functioning of a civilian bureaucracy. E, I have no specific knowledge of the functions, regulations or procedures of the LaQuinta Planning Commission. However, this knowledge can be obtained through study. I possess the qualities of decision making, responsibility and integrity which are qualities acquired through maturity and experience. 4 As a resident of California, and LaQuinta in particular, I believe we face a future of continued growth and great opportunity, but also challenges to our life styles, natural beauty and resources. Predicting the future is not an attainable goal, however, planning is a responsible and necessary function of government at all levels. Planning deals with the realities of today, the dreams of tomorrow and the unpredictability of mankind. 5 I believe I have the ability to get along with people, discuss difficult issues with objectivity, present ideas for change without emotional attachment, and arrive at solutions through intelligent compromise when required. 336 v)6 L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E C �J CANDIDATE DAVID C. THOMS QUALIFICATIONS: • Bachelor of Science Degree in LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE. • Active member of the AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS. • Presently, holder of California License #1032 and Arizona License #9347. EXPERIENCE: • Directly responsible for many quality projects within the Cities and Counties of Los Angeles, Pasadena, San Bernardino, Beverly Hills, Newport Beach, as well as out of the state projects. DEDICATION: • It is my desire to be one of the best commission members serving the City of La Quinta. Respectfully submitted, David C. Thoms 337 David C. Thoms, ASIA • California License Number 1032 47-410 Via Cordova, La Quinta, California 92253 , TEL (760) 564-5049 • FAX (760) 564-7349 L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E CANDIDATE DAVID C. THOMS QUALIFICATIONS: 0 Bachelor of Science Degree in LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE. • Active member of the AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS. 0 Presently, holder of California License #1032 and Arizona License #9347. EXPERIENCE: Directly responsible for many quality projects within the Cities and Counties of Los Angeles, Pasadena, San Bernardino, Beverly Hills, Newport Beach, as well as out of the state projects. DEDICATION: It is nay desire to be one of the best commission members serving the City of La Quinta. Respectfully submitted, David C. Thoms 333 David C. Thoms, ASLA • California License Number 1032 47-410 Via Cordova, La Quinta, California 92253 • TEL (760) 564-5049 • FAx (760) 564-7349 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: V COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Consideration of Utilizing City -Owned Building in The Village as Offices for PUBLIC HEARING: _ La Quinta Police Department RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: If the City Council chooses to authorize the use of the building as offices for La Quinta police officers, the building will need certain upgrades totaling an estimated $10,000. In addition, the City's cost for operating and maintaining the facility on an annual basis will total approximately $8,500. Therefore, the total budget allocation for FY 2001-02 is estimated at $18,500. Funding for this item can be discussed during the FY 2001-02 Preliminary Budget discussions. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: During a study session at the June 5, 2001 City Council meeting, the Council discussed future uses for the City -owned facility in The Village. After considering several options, the Council directed staff to explore the feasibility of using the building as offices for the La Quinta Police Department. In order to assess the feasibility and cost of transferring the existing police office at City Hall to the building in The Village, staff conducted on -site visits to the building, met with Police Department officials and consulted with Chamber of Commerce staff (on utility costs). Establishing and maintaining the police offices would require the following: Building upgrades/equipping building for police. The work identified for safety and expediency purposes includes: self -closing arm on front door, keypad on front door (with automatic lock), one dedicated phone line, bars on windows, 339 lock on electrical breaker box, blinds for (front) large room window, one exterior motion detector light (backyard), one photocell light (frontyard), storage shed relocation, alarm deactivation. Subtotal: $10,000 (estimate) Initial transfer of equipment from City Hall. The items that would get transferred from the City Hall office include: a computer, a printer, two desks, four chairs (file cabinets and bookcases as needed). Subtotal: $0 Operations/maintenance (estimated annual costs): Electricity Water Telephone Waste collection Landscaping Janitorial Property Insurance Subtotal: $8,500 $1,800 ($150 per month) $1,200 ($100 per month) $900 ($75 per month) $360 ($30 per month) $1,200 ($100 per month) $3,000 ($250 per month) $40 GRAND TOTAL: $18,500 Police Department officials expressed that they would be utilizing the large back room as their main office and the large front room as storage space (a diagram of the building is included as Attachment 1). They suggest using the storage sheds to ensure that equipment such as traffic cones, barricades, and emergency flares are readily available. The City would have access to the remaining two small rooms for storage space or other purposes as deemed appropriate. Police officials have stressed that the building is intended for office uses only, serving six to eight officers per day. It would not be marked by any signage, nor be open to the public. Officers would not be receiving emergency calls or walk-ins. Some of the tasks the officers would perform on -site would include: writing reports, making telephone calls, holding small meetings and briefings, and other such activities. Use of the building would be on a 24-hour basis. Police officials advised that there may be some impact on neighboring residential occupants due to the public presence, especially noticeable at night (i.e., use of radios, cars responding to calls, etc.). Efforts would be made to minimize this impact on neighboring residents. 3 el 0 002 If the Council elects to support the use of the building as offices for the Police Department, City staff would proceed with the transfer and upgrades, and ensure all maintenance issues are properly addressed. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Authorize the use of the City -owned facility in The Village as offices for the La Quinta Police Department, and authorize staff to include funds in the FY 2001-02 Budget for various building upgrades and annual operation and maintenance of the facility; or 2. Do not authorize the use of the City -owned facility in The Village as offices for the La Quinta Police Department; or 3. Direct staff to explore an alternative use for the City -owned facility; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Mari6Xasillas, Nlanagementnalyst Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Diagram of City -Owned Facility 341 003 1i Attachment 1 J M J0 a O a a Z 2 O O w w J J �0 U)IX w w z w x U H w U z z w Cn a 0 w Co 0 z w a 3 4'_ 99 T4t!t 4ZwQu&rw AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: 4 COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: Consideration of Lease Agreement with the Family YMCA PUBLIC HEARING: of the Desert for the La Quinta Facility RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The Lease Agreement specifies under Section 3.1 that rent in the amount of $1 .00 per year be paid by the YMCA to the City of La Quinta. The rent is to be collected in advance of the commencement date for the full term of the lease. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The first Lease Agreement (Agreement) between the City of La Quinta and the Family YMCA of the Desert (YMCA) was approved by the City Council on February 5, 1991 with an expiration date of August 1996 for the use of the City owned child care facility. The Agreement was amended on June 4, 1991 to provide for priority placement for La Quinta residents in the child care program. A second Agreement was approved in April 1996 that extended the lease to 2001, as provided in Attachment 1. The La Quinta Child Care facility is currently at capacity with a waiting list of 40 students. The YMCA is exploring the possibility of adding additional square footage to the facility. The facility is owned by the City and therefore any modifications must be approved by the City Council. At this point, the YMCA is confirming with the State Licensing Division on space requirements as well as with the original architect of the facility regarding the additional square footage. A possible funding source for the YMCA for the expansion may be available through Proposition 10. This proposition provides funds for child care programs and facilities. The YMCA would like to apply for possible funding through Proposition 10. The request for a ten year Agreement with the City would allow the YMCA to be more 343 competitive for funding, as the organization will have access to the facility for a longer period of time. Provided as Attachment 1 is an Agreement with the termination date of April 2011. No other changes have been made to the Agreement. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve the Lease Agreement with the Family YMCA of the Desert for the La Quinta Facility with an termination date of April 201 1; or 2. Approve the Lease Agreement with the Family YMCA of the Desert for the La Quinta Facility with an termination date to be determined; or 3. Do not approve the Lease Agreement with the Family YMCA of the Desert for the La Quinta Facility; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Minutes of the April 2, 1996 City Council Meeting 2. Lease Agreement Between the City and the Family YMCA of the Desert 344 S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.121.YMCA Lease.wpd 0 0 2 ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Minutes 3 April 2, 1996 1. CONSIDERATION OF A LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND THE FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT. Mayor Holt advised that she previously has abstained from issues dealing with the YMCA, but is no longer affiliated with them and would participate in this discussion. Ms. Nicholson, Parks & Recreation Director, advised that the current lease agreement with the YMCA will expire in August, 1996 and the new lease agreement period would be from April, 1996 to April, 2001. The agreement would allow the YMCA to continue providing child-care services at the facility on Park Avenue. The new agreement eliminates the City's ownership of the YMCA furniture and equipment for the purpose of encouraging the YMCA to upgrade them. It also allows the City to schedule use of the facility by community organizations on Saturdays which will provide the Park & Recreation Department more facility opportunities to more effectively serve the residents of the community. The agreement also clarifies that the City must authorize and select contractors for major repairs to the facility. In response to Council Member Sniff, Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, advised that she has reviewed the agreement and feels that the changes are appropriate. Council Member Sniff asked if income reports are received from the YMCA and questioned the possibility of increasing the rent on the facility, pointing out that the YMCA collects approximately $360,000 annually for child-care services and only pays $1 /year for rent. Ms. Nicholson advised that financial reports have not been received in the past, but such a requirement could be included in the new agreement. She advised that they try to keep salaries at a level whereby dependable qualified personnel are maintained as well as acceptable staff/children ratios. Council Member Sniff didn't believe that staff costs could be that much and asked if other operators had been solicited for an interest in operating child- care services at the facility to which Ms. Nicholson responded no. In response to Council Member Sniff, Ms. Nicholson advised that the YMCA is responsible for the utilities as well as marketing and providing the program, pointing out that a waiting list exists for their services. 345 004 City Council Minutes 4 April 2, 1996 Council Member Henderson asked what the child-care fees are based on. Ms. Chris Sanders, 49-955 Park Avenue, Associated Executive of YMCA, advised that they operate at a loss because of the financial assistance they offer to approximately 1/3 of their participants. Their annual budget is approximately $270,000. They are required by the State to have a minimum of one staff person for every 12 children which results in them having three full-time and 13 part-time staff members. Registration for the programs offered in La Quinta can be made at either La Quints or Palm Desert. In response to Council Member Adolph, Ms. Sanders didn't know if they have received funding from other agencies, but advised that she would find out. She advised that they have no problem with the proposed agreement. In response to Council Member Henderson, Ms. Nicholson advised that the YMCA will schedule the facility for community use Monday through Friday, but the City will control the scheduling for Saturdays. The Parks & Recreation Department will be responsible for scheduling and coordinating Saturday activities at the Boys & Girls Club and YMCA, as well as the community service building at the park if arrangements are worked out with the C. V. Recreation & Park District. The City will be responsible for major repairs to the YMCA facility such as repairing and replacing the roof, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, and electrical systems. Council Member Perkins felt that a dollar amount should be used to define major repairs. Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, advised that she was comfortable with the language in the agreement because the YMCA would be responsible for all repairs that are not included in the definition of major repairs and if a dollar amount is used to make that determination, the City could be held responsible for other repairs above that limit. Council Member Perkins wished to see budgets from all the organizations supported by the City. He was pleased with the service provided by the YMCA and wouldn't support a request to increase their rent, but would like to see their budget for future reference. Council Member Sniff felt that use of a dollar amount to determine major repairs might be a valid consideration as the building ages. He asked if the YMCA charges outside organizations a fee for using the building. Ms. Sanders advised that only a cleaning fee is charged when applicable. 3 4 G 005 City Council Minutes 5 April 2, 1996 Council Member Henderson felt that they should consider charging for use of the utilities. In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Genovese advised that the building is five years old. MOTION- It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to approve the lease agreement between the City of La Quinta and the Family YMCA of the Desert with periodic financial reporting from the YMCA to the City. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 96-44. 2. CONSIDERATION OF TERMINATION OF CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF FRITZ BURNS PARK/PALM ROYALE PARK WITH JAMES T. DUNPHY COMPANY FOR CAUSE. Mr. Cosper, Public Works Director, advised that the staff report outlines the problems that the City has experienced with the James T. Dunphy Company, who was hired to construct the two parks. Completion of the parks has been delayed since November 7, 1995. He advised that the contractor was notified on March 12th that staff would make a recommendation to the Council to terminate the contract for cause if the work was not completed by April 1 st. Since then, the contractor has worked diligently to complete the work which is now 99.3% complete and staff no longer recommends termination of the contract. In response to Mayor Holt, Mr. Cosper advised that the contractor has been notified without response of the additional costs he would be charged for not fulfilling his obligation. In response to Council Member Adolph, Mr. Cosper advised that he disagrees with the contractor's implication in his letter that the City is responsible for the delays because the contract completion date was extended to cover any delays caused by the City. He anticipated that the punch list would be completed by the end of the week. In response to Mayor Holt, Mr. Cosper advised that the City would retain final payment for the project until all items on the punch list have been completed. Council Member Henderson asked if a penalty clause for delays was included in the contract and what the final costs for such delays were. 34 006 ATTACHMENT 2 LEASE AGREEMENT by and between CITY OF LA QUINTA "Lessor" and THE FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT, "Lessee" Page 1 343 01't'1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ARTICLE 1. TERM OF LEASE 1.2 Premises ............................... 1 1.3 Reservation .............................. 1 1.4 Term .................................. 1 1.5 Date of Lease and Legal Effect .................. 1 ARTICLE II OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS 2.1 Ownership of Improvements and Furnishings, Fixtures, Equipment and Personal Property ........... 2 ARTICLE III RENT 3.1 Minimum Rent ............................ 2 3.2 Additional Payments ......................... 2 3.3 Place of Payment; Late Payments ................. 2 ARTICLE IV. USE OF PREMISES AND COMPLIANCE WITH LAW 4.1 Permitted Uses ............................ 2 4.2 Use of Premises by Community Organizations ......... 3 4.3 Nondiscrimination .......................... 3 4.4 City Resident Incentives ....................... 3 ARTICLE V. PAYMENT OF EXPENSES .................... 3 ARTICLE VI. MAINTENANCE OF LEASED PREMISES 6.1 Lessee's Obligations ......................... 4 6.2 Lessee's Obligations for Maintenance ............... 5 ARTICLE VII. INSURANCE AND INDEMNITY Page 2 349 008 7.1 Lessee's Insurance ......................... 6 7.2 Covenant to Indemnify and Hold Harmless ........... 7 7.3 Waiver of Subrogation ....................... 8 ARTICLE VIII. UTILITY CHARGES ....................... 8 ARTICLE IX. ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS .............. 9 ARTICLE X. CASUALTY LOSS AND RESTORATION 10.1 Non -Termination .......................... 9 10.2 Repair of Damage ......................... 9 10.3 Continued Operations ....................... 10 ARTICLE XI. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING 11.1 Agency's Consent Required .................... 10 11.2 Lessee Remains Obligated .................... 10 ARTICLE XII. DEFAULT 12.1 Events of Default .......................... 11 12.2 Remedies .............................. 11 12.3 Default by Lessor .......................... 13 12.4 Legal Expenses and Collection Costs .............. 14 ARTICLE XIII. HOLDING OVER ......................... 14 ARTICLE XIV. ACCESS BY LESSOR ....................... 14 ARTICLE IV. QUIET ENJOYMENT ....................... 15 ARTICLE XVI. FURNITURE, FIXTURE AND EQUIPMENT FINANCING ............................ 15 ARTICLE XVIL TAXES ................................ 16 Page 3 350 C.0 9 ARTICLE ARTICLE XVIII. FORCE MAJEURE ........................ 16 IXX. MISCELLANEOUS 19.1 Waiver ................................ 17 19.2 Notices ................................ 17 19.3 Relationship to Parties ....................... 17 19.4 Accord and Satisfaction ...................... 17 19.5 Time of Essence ........................... 18 19.6 Remedies Cumulative ....................... 18 19.7 Effect of Invalidity ......................... 18 19.8 Successors and Assigns ...................... 18 19.9 Entire Agreement .......................... 18 19.10 Interest of Past -Due Obligations ................. 18 19.11 Execution of Lease; No Option .................. 19 19.12 Corporate Authority ........................ 19 19.13 Controlling Law ........................... 19 19.14 Specific Performance ........................ 19 19.15 Survival of Indemnities and Warranties ............. 19 Page 4 351 - 610 LEASE AGREEMENT THIS LEASE AGREEMENT (the "Lease") is entered into this 19t'day of June, by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA ("Lessor"), a municipal corporation formed under the laws of the State of California, and the FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT, a California nonprofit corporation ("Lessee"). In consideration of the payments to be made hereunder and the covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: ARTICLE I. TERM OF LEASE 1.1 Premises. Lessor is currently the owner of that parcel of real property located in the City of La Quinta, legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Premises"). The address of the Premises is 49-955 Park Avenue, La Quinta, California. Lessor agrees to lease to Lessee and Lessee agrees to lease from lessor the Premises upon the terms and conditions expressed herein. 1.2 Reservation. Lessor reserves to itself, its successors, and assigns, together with the right to grant and transfer all or a portion of the same, the non-exclusive right to enter upon the Premises in accordance with any rights of Lessor set forth in this Lease. 1.3 Exceptions to Leasehold Estate. This lease is made subject to all covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, rights, rights -of -way, easements, and all other matters of record or apparent upon a visual inspection of the Premises affecting the Premises or the use thereof on the date this Lease is executed by Lessee. 1.4 Term. The "Term" of this Lease shall be five (5) years, commencing on the date (the "Term Commencement Date") that this agreement has been executed. 1.5 Date of Lease and Legal Effect. The terms, covenants and conditions of this lease shall become legally binding on the Term Commencement Date. ARTICLE II. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS 2.1 Ownership of Improvements and Furnishings, Fixtures, Equipment and Personal Property. During the entire Term of this Lease, the improvements and all Fixtures that are made in or on the Premises by Lessee, and all changes, alterations Improvements and addition thereto, shall be owned by and considered as the property of Lessor. Furniture and Equipment that is purchased by the Lessee that is not affixed to the Improvements or property shall be owned by and considered as property of Lessee. Page 5 35`' Oil ARTICLE III. RENT 3.1 Minimum Rent. During the Term of this Lease, Lessee shall pay to Lessor for each year from the Term Commencement Date One Dollar ($1.00) (the "Rent"). The Rent owing for the full Term of the Lease shall be payable in advance of the Term Commencement Date. 3.2 Additional Payments. Except as otherwise provided in this lease, all sums of money or charges whatsoever required to be paid by Lessee to Lessor under this Lease other than Rent shall be due and payable fifteen (15) days after demand, presented in writing by certified mail, without any deductions or offsets whatsover. Lessor shall have no obligation to bill Lessee for monthly Rent, security charges, or other operational expenses. Lessee's failure to pay any such amounts or charges when due shall carry with it the same consequences as Lessee's failure to pay Rent and shall be deemed to be additional Rent. 3.3 Place of Payment. Late Payments. Lessee agrees to pay the rental and other charges herein reserved to Lessor at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253, payable to Lessor or to such other person and/or at such other location as Lessor may from time to time designate in writing. All payments shall be made by check for an account in lawful money of the United States. All payments requiring proration shall be prorated on the basis of a thirty (30 ) day month. ARTICLE IV. USE OF PREMISES AND COMPLIANCE WITH LAW 4.1 Permitted Uses. Lessor's primary purpose for entering into this Lease is to provide for the operation of the Facility which shall be used to provide child care services and a center for the youth oriented activities of other community organization. In furtherance of this purpose, Lessee shall use the Premises to operate thereon the Facility. Lessee shall not use the Premises for any other purposes without prior written consent of Lessor. Lessee, at Lessee's expense, shall promptly comply with all present and future laws, ordinances, orders, rules, regulations and requirements of all governmental authorities having jurisdiction affecting the Premises or the cleanliness, safety, occupancy and use of the same, whether or not any such law, ordinance, order, rule, regulation or requirement is substantial, or foreseen or unforeseen, or ordinary or extraordinary or shall necessitate structural changes of the Improvements or interfere with the use and enjoyment of the Premises. If any governmental license or permit shall be required for the proper and lawful conduct of the Premises as a child care center, Lessee shall procure and thereafter maintain such license or permit at its sole cost and expense and shall submit the same for inspection by Lessor. 4.2 Use of Premises by Community Organizations. Lessor agrees that the Premises shall be available for use by community organizations other than Lessee. Lessee shall be responsible for scheduling use of the Premises by communi1y organizations which shall be available to these organizations after 6:30 P.M. Monday through Friday and all day Sunday. Lessor shall be responsible for scheduling use of the Premises by community organizations which shall be available Page 6 353 612, all day Saturday. Lessee and Lessor shall incorporate a security deposit system when schedulinia the facility to cover any damages to furniture, equipment or property 4.3 Nondiscrimination. Lessee covenants for itself, its heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through it, that this Lease is made and accepted upon and subject to the condition that there shall be no discrimination against or segregtion of any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, age, national origin, ancestry, political affiliation or physical handicap associated with the construction, operation and maintenance of the Premises. 4.4 City Resident Incentives. Lessee is hereby required to develop an incentive program (the "Program") for residents of the City of La Quinta in the form of priority placement on waiting lists, if any. The Program shall provide preference for admission in the following order: (i) children of La Quinta. residents; (ii) children of persons who work in La Quinta; and (iii) all other applicants. Failure to provide a Program shall constitute a "default" as such term is used in Section 12.1 hereof. ARTICLE VI. PAYMENT OF EXPENSES Lessee shall pay all of the costs and expenses in the operation, management, and maintenance of the Facility. Such expenses shall include, without limitation, the following: (i) expenses incurred by Lessee in connection with the Facility for general maintenance, painting, lighting, cleaning, trash removal, security, fire protection;(ii) all charges, surcharges and other levies imposed by, and all costs (whether or not capital in nature) of compliance with the requirements of any federal, state or local governmental agency regulating use of the Facility as a child care center; and (iii) the actual cost of repairs to the Facility, excluding major repairs. Lessor shall pay the costs of major repairs to the Facility, which shall include repairing and replacing the roof, plumbing, heating, air conditioning and electrical systems. Prior to authorization of any major repairs, Lessee shall obtain written authorization by Lessor indicating_ approval of contractor and amount of contractor's estimate. ARTICLE VI. MAINTENANCE OF LEASED PREMISES 6.1 Lessee's Obligations for Maintenance. (a) Lessee's Obligations. Lessee, at Lessee's expense without cost to Lessor, shall maintain in good order, condition, quality, and repair, the Facility and every part thereof and any and all appurtenances thereto wherever located, and all other repairs, replacements, renewals and restorations, ordinary and extraordinary, foreseen and unforeseen. If Lessee wishes to make any repairs to the Premises which would result in a change in use of the Premises permitted by this Lease or adversely affect the value of the Premises or Improvements or materially change the external structure or appearance of the Facility, Lessee shall submit to Lessor for its approval documentation which describes the desired repairs, including floor Page 7 35.1 013 plans, building sections, building materials and components, samples of proposed exterior building materials, and the like, to the extent relevant to the particular repair. Lessor's approval shall be given within a reasonable period of time not to exceed sixty (60) days after receipt by Lessor from lessee of all necessary documents and information relating to such repairs (which sixty(60) day period does not include the Lessor's normal development review requirements) and such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld provided that the proposed repair shall not, in Lessor's reasonable judgment, impair or diminish the value or structural integrity of the Improvements, have the likely result of diminishing the income or revenues of Lessee over the Term of the Lease, or not be in harmony with neighboring buildings. (b) Standard of Maintenance. Lessee shall keep and maintain the Premises and the Improvements in a clean, sanitary and safe condition in accordance with the laws of the State of California and in accordance with all directions, rules and regulations of the health officer, Fire Marshall, building inspector or other proper officials of the governmental agencies having jurisdiction, and Lessee shall comply with all requirements of laws and ordinances affecting the Premises and the improvements, all at the sole cost and expense of Lessee. At the time of the expiration of the tenancy created herein, Lessee shall surrender the Premises and the Improvements thereon in good order, condition and repair. (c) Liens. Lessee shall keep the Premises, the Improvements, or any part thereof free from any and all liens arising out of any work performed, materials furnished or obligations incurred by or for Lessee, and agrees to cause to be discharged of record any mechanic's or materialmen's lien within twenty (20) days after the lien has been filed or within ten (10) days after receipt of written request from Lessor, whichever shall be the sooner. Lessee shall give Lessor at least fifteen (15) days written notice prior to commencing or causing to be commenced any work on the Premises (whether prior or subsequent to the commencement of the Term), so that Lessor shall have reasonable opportunity to file and post notices of non -responsibility for Lessee's work. Lessor may condition its consent to work upon Lessee posting lien and material and/or completion bonds in amounts as may be necessary to cover the anticipated cost of such work and potential overruns. Lessee shall reimburse Lessor for any and all costs and expenses which may be incurred by Lessor by reason of the filing of any such liens and/or removal of same, such reimbursement to be made within ten (10) days after receipt by Lessee from Lessor of a statement setting forth the amount of the costs and expenses. (d) Lessor's Substitute Performance. In the event Lessee fails, refuses or neglects to commence and complete promptly and adequately any of the Improvements, required repairs or maintenance within the times set forth in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit B), to remove any lien, to pay any cost or expense relating to such matters, or to otherwise perform any act or fulfill any obligation required of Lessee pursuant to this Section 6.1, Lessor may, but shall not be required to, make or complete any such repairs, remove such lien, or pay such cost and expense, and Lessee shall reimburse Lessor for all costs and expenses of Lessor thereby incurred within fifteen (15) days after receipt by Lessee from Lessor of a statement setting forth the amount of such costs and expenses which shall be deemed to be additional Rent and subject to the same consequences as herein Page 8 355 G14 provided for failure to pay Rent. If reasonably possible under the circumstances, Lessor shall give Lessee written notice fifteen (15) days prior to commencement of any substitute performance. Any failure by Lessor to give such notice, however, shall not.prejudice Lessor's rights hereunder or after Lessee's obligations hereunder or after Lessee's obligations hereunder. Lessor's rights and remedies pursuant to this subsection (d) shall be in addition to any and all other rights and remedies provided under this Lease or at law. 6.2 Lessor's Obligations For Maintenance (a) Grounds and Playground. Lessor shall maintain the grounds surrounding the Facility including all landscaping areas, playgrounds, and equipment excluding trash enclosure areas which shall be the responsibility of Lessee. Lessor shall also maintain, repair and replace the parking areas located on the Premises. (b) Trash Removal. Lessor shall be responsible for removing all trash on the Premises which is generated by Lessor's maintenance of the grounds. ARTICLE VII. INSURANCE AND INDEMNITY 7.1 Lessee's Insurance. (a) Tvves. Lessee, at no cost and expense to Lessor, shall procure and keep in full force and effect during the Term or cause to be procured and kept in full force and effect for the mutual benefit of Lessor and Lessee, insurance policies meeting the minimum requirements set forth below or such greater requirements that are generally obtained from time to time for properties, improvements, activities, and operations similar to those on the Premises in the Southern California area: (i) comprehensive general liability insurance with respect to the Premises and the operations of or on behalf of Lessee or its agents, officers, directors, and employees in, on or about the Premises in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence combined single limit bodily injury, personal injury, death and property damage liability per occurrence, subject to such increases in amount as Lessor may reasonably require from time to time. Coverage shall include, but not be limited to personal injury liability, premises and operation, blanket contractual, cross liability, severability of interest, broad form property damage, and independent contractors. The policy or policies shall include that Lessor and its officers, employees, and agents shall be additional insured under such policy or policies; (ii) worker's compensation coverage as required by the laws of the State of California together with employer's liability coverage. (iii) with respect to the improvements, fixtures, furnishings, equipment and other Page 9 3 5 G 015 items of personal property located on or in the Premises, insurance against fire, peril of flood, extended coverage, vandalism and malicious mischief, and such other additional perils, hazards and risk as now are or may be included in standard "all risk" forms in general use in Riverside County, California, for an amount equal to not less than the full current actual replacement cost thereof. Lessor shall be an additional insured under such policy or policies and such insurance shall contain a replacement cost endorsement; (b) Standard. All policies of insurance required to be carried by Lessee under this Lease shall be written by responsible and, solvent insurance companies authorized to do business in the State of California. Any such insurance required of Lessee hereunder may be furnished by Lessee under any blanket policy carried by it or under a separate policy therefor. A copy of each paid -up policy evidencing such insurance (appropriately authenticated by the insurer) or a certificate of the insurer, certifying that such policy has been issued, providing the coverage required by this Section and containing provisions specified herein, shall be delivered to Lessor prior to the date Lessee is given the right of possession of the Premises or as Lessor may otherwise require, and upon renewals, not less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of such coverage. Lessor may, at any time, and from time to time, inspect and/or copy any and all insurance policies required to be procured by Lessee hereunder. In no event shall the limits of any policy be considered as limiting the liability of Lessee under this Lease. (c) Specific Provisions in Policy. Each policy evidencing insurance required to be carried by Lessee pursuant to this Article shall contain the following provisions or clauses: (i) a provision that the insurer will not cancel or materially change the coverage provided by such policy without first giving Lessor thirty (30) days prior written notice; and (ii) a waiver by the Lessee's insurer of any right to subrogation against Lessor, its agents, employees or representatives which arises or might arise by reason of any payment under such policy or policies or by reason of any act or omission of Lessor, its agents, employees or representatives. (d) Lessor's Substitute Performance. In the event that Lessee fails to procure, maintain and/or pay for at the times and for the durations specified in this Section 7.1, any insurance required by this Section, or fails to carry insurance required by law or governmental regulation, Lessor may (but without obligation to do so) at any time or from time to time, after thirty (30) days written notice to Lessee, procure such insurance and pay the premiums therefor, in which event Lessee shall repay Lessor all sums so paid by Lessor together with interest thereon as provided elsewhere herein, within fifteen (15) days following Lessor's written demand to Lessee for such payment. 7.2 Covenant to Indemnify and Hold Harmless. Lessee covenants to defend and indemnify Lessor, its officers, directors, partners, representatives, agents and employees, and save Page 10 357 01u them from and against any and all claims, actions, losses, damages, liability, and expenses, including attorneys' fees, in connection with the loss of life, bodily injury and/or damage to property arising from or out of or in connection with any occurrence in, upon or at the Premises, or the occupancy or use by Lessee of the Premises or any part thereof, or arising from or out of Lessee's failure to comply with any provision of this Lease or otherwise occasioned wholly or in part by any act or omission of Lessee, its agents, directors, representatives, contractors, employees, servants, invitees or licensees, excepting that the foregoing indemnification and hold harmless provision shall not apply in the event of any uninsured willful or actively negligent misconduct on behalf of Lessor or any of its agents, representatives, or employees, or in the event any such claims, actions, losses, damages, liability, costs, or expenses arise out of a breach by Lessor of its obligations under this lease. If Lessor is made a party to any litigation commenced by or against Lessee, then Lessee shall protect, defend and hold Lessor harmless and shall pay all costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred or paid by Lessor in connection with such litigation. Lessor may, at its option, require Lessee to assume Lessor's defense in any action covered by this Section 7.2 through counsel selected by Lessor and reasonably satisfactory to Lessee. Lessee, as a material part of the consideration to Lessor, hereby assumes all risk of damage to property or injury to persons in, upon or about the Premises and Improvements from any cause whatsoever, and Lessee hereby waives all its claims in respect thereof against Lessor excepting only damage or injury arising out of (i) the uninsured willful or actively negligent misconduct or Lessor or any of its agents, representatives, or employees, or (ii) a breach by Lessor of its obligations under this Lease. 7.3 Waiver of Subrogation. Each party hereto does hereby waive, remise, release and discharge the other parry hereto and any officer, director, shareholder, beneficiary, partner, agent, employees or representative of such other party, of and from any liability whatsoever hereafter arising from loss or damage for which insurance containing a waiver of subrogation is carried by the injured party under such insurance. Lessee shall, upon obtaining the policies of insurance required hereunder, give notice to the insurance carrier or carriers that the foregoing mutual waiver of subrogation is contained in this Lease. ARTICLE VIII. UTILITY CHARGES Lessee shall pay all charges for gas, water, sewer, electricity, telephone and other utility services used on or in the Premises. If any such charges are not paid when due, Lessor may pay the same after giving Lessee fifteen (15) days prior written notice, and any amount so paid by Lessor shall thereupon become due to Lessor from Lessee as additional Rent. ARTICLE IX. ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS Without Lessor's prior written consent, which consent may be withheld or granted in Lessor's sole discretion, Lessee shall not have the right to make changes or alterations to the Improvements or the Premises, except on the following conditions: Page 11 359 (a) Lessee shall not make any alterations, whether structural or non-structural, which will decrease the value of the Premises or the Improvements. If the cost of such changes or alterations to the Improvements or the Premises exceeds Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000), Lessee shall submit to Lessor plans and specifications for approval. (b) Before the commencement of any work, Lessee shall pay the amount of any increased premiums on insurance policies provided for hereunder; (c) Lessor shall in no event be required to make any alterations, rebuilding, replacement, changes, additions or Improvements or repairs to the Premises, except as specifically provided in this Lease; (d) All such changes, alterations, rebuilding, replacements, additions, improvements and repairs to the Premises made by Lessee shall be deemed to have attached to the realty and to have become the property of Lessor upon the expiration of the Term or upon sooner termination of this Lease. ARTICLE X. CASUALTY LOSS AND RESTORATION 10.1 Non -Termination. Except as provided herein, no destruction or damage to the Improvements or the Premises by fire, windstorm or other casualty whether insured or uninsured shall entitle Lessee to terminate this Lease. 10.2 Repair of Damage (a) Obligation to Repair Damage Due to Casualty Covered by Insurance. Subject to Section 10.5 below, if the Premises shall be totally or partially destroyed or rendered wholly untenantable by fire or other casualty required to be insured by Lessee, Lessor shall promptly proceed to obtain insurance proceeds and take all steps necessary to begin reconstruction and, immediately upon receipt of insurance proceeds, promptly and diligently commence the repair or replacement of the Improvements to substantially the same condition as they are required to be maintained in under this Lease, so long as the insurance proceeds are sufficient to cover the actual cost of restoration, and shall complete the same as soon as possible so that Lessee may continue in occupancy. If, however, the insurance proceeds are insufficient or the then -existing laws of any other governmental agencies with jurisdiction over the Premises do not permit the restoration, Lessor may elect to terminate this Lease by giving notice to Lessee. Notwithstanding the above, the Lessor is not required to obtain earthquake coverage insurance and shall not be obligated to reconstruct following damage sustained due to an earthquake unless such damage is covered by other provisions of its insurance policy (i.e. fire). 10.3 Continued Operations. During any period of repair, Lessee shall continue, or cause the continuation of, the operations of its programs on the Premises and use of the Facility by Page 12 018 community groups to the extent reasonably practicable. However, irrespective of the continued operation during such period for repair, the Rent payable hereunder shall not be deferred and shall not be abated. Upon completion of such repair and restoration, Lessee shall promptly refrxture and restock the Improvements, if necessary, substantially to the condition prior to the casualty, or as otherwise required by this Lease, whichever is greater, and shall reopen if closed by the casualty. ARTICLE XI. ASSIGNMENTS AND SUBLETTING 11.1 Agency's Consent Required. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, Lessee agrees and covenants (which covenants shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, and administrators of Lessee) that Lessee shall not, either; voluntarily or by operation of law, assign, sell, encumber, pledge or otherwise transfer all or any part of Lessees's leasehold estate hereunder, or permit the Premise to be occupied by anyone other than Lessee. Lessee's employees or invitees, or sublet the Premise, or any portion thereof, without Lessor's prior written consent. No assignment, whether voluntary or involuntary, by operation of law, under legal process or proceedings, by receivership, in bankruptcy, or otherwise, and no subletting shall be valid or effective without such prior written consent, and at Lessor's election, shall constitute a default. 11.2 Lessee Remains Obligated. No subletting or assignment, even with the consent of Lessor, shall relieve Lessee of its obligation to pay Rent and all of its other obligations hereunder. The acceptance by Lessor of any payment due hereunder from any person or entity other than Lessee shall not be construed as a waiver by Lessor of any provision of this Lease or as a consent to any assignment or subletting. Consent by Lessor to an assignment of the Lease or to a subletting of the Premises shall not operate as a waiver or estoppel to the future enforcement by Lessor of its rights pursuant to this Lease. ARTICLE XII. DEFAULT 12.1 Event of Default. The word "default", as used in this Section 12.1, shall mean and include any one or more of the following events or occurrences: (a) The failure by Lessee to make any payment or rent, or other payment required to by made by Lessee hereunder, when due and the continuance of such failure for a period of fifteen (15) days after Lessor has given Lessee written notice specifying the same; (b) The failure of Lessee to perform any term, condition, covenant or agreement of this Lease, excluding the payment of Rent, and the continuation of such failure for a period of thirty (30) days after Lessor shall have given Lessee written notice specifying the same, or in the case of a situation in which the default cannot reasonably be cured within thirty (30) days, if Lessee shall not promptly, within thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice, commence to remedy the situation by a means that can reasonably be expected to remedy the situation within a reasonable period of time, and diligently pursue the same to completion; Page 13 360 019 (c) The failure of Lessee to make the Improvements listed in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit B) by the respective times set therefor; (c) The abandonment by Lessee of the Premise or a substantial portion thereof; (e) Lessee's (i) application for, consent to, or suffering of, the appointment of a receiver, trustee, or liquidator for all or for a substantial portion of its assets; (ii) making a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; (iii) being adjudged a bankruptcy; (iv) filing a voluntary petition or suffering an involuntary petition under any bankruptcy, arrangement, reorganizations or insolvency law (unless in the case of an involuntary petition, the same is dismissed with thirty (30) days of such filing); or (v) fifteen (15) consecutive days any attachment, levy, execution or seizure of all or a substantial portion of the Lessee's assets or of Lessee's interest in this Lease; 12.2 Remedies. (a) General. In the event of any default by Lessees, including the expiration of any applicable cure period, Lessor may: (i) Terminate Lessee's right to possession of the Premises by any lawful means, in which care this Lease shall terminate and Lessee shall immediately surrender possession of the Premises to Lessor. In the event Lessor shall be entitled to recover from Lessee: (1) The worth at the time of award of the unpaid Rent which had been earned at the time of termination; (2) The worth at the time of award of the amount by which the unpaid Rent which would have been earned after termination until the time of award exceeds the amount of such loss that Lessee proves could have been reasonably avoided; (3) The worth at the time of award of the amount by which the unpaid Rent for the balance of the Term after the time of award exceeds the amount of such loss that Lessee proves could be reasonably avoided; and (4) Any other amount deemed necessary and/or allowable by applicable statute or decision to compensate Lessor for all the detriment proximately caused by Lessee's failure to perform its obligations under this Lease or which, in the ordinary course of events, would be likely to result therefrom, including, but not limited to, the cost of recovering possession of the Premises, expenses of reflecting, expenses of restoring the Premises to the condition required hereunder (if applicable), reasonable attorneys' fees, and any other reasonable costs. Page 14 361 020 The "worth at the time of award" of the amounts referred to in subparagraphs (1) and (2) above shall be computed by allowing interests at a rate equal to ten percent (10%) from the dates such amounts accrued to Lessor until the date of payment by Lessee. (iii) Lessor may terminate this Lease by express written notice to Lessee of its election to do so. Such termination shall not relieve Lessee of any obligation hereunder which has accrued prior to the date of such termination. In the event of such termination, Lessor shall be entitled to recover from Lessee the amounts determined pursuant to paragraph (1) above. (b) Reasonable Rental Value. In any action for unlawful detailed commenced by Lessor against Lessee by reason of any default hereunder, the reasonable rental value of the Premises for the period of the unlawful detailed shall be deemed to be the amount of Rent and other charges reserved in this Lease for such period unless Lessor or Lessee shall prove to the contrary by competent evidence. (c) Cumulative Remedies. Except as may be specifically provided herein, the rights and remedies reserved to Lessor and Lessee herein, including those not specifically described, shall be cumulative and, except as provided by California statutory or decisional law in effect at the time, either Lessor or Lessee may pursue any or all of such rights and remedies at the same time or otherwise. (d) Lessor's Non -Waiver. No delay or omission of Lessor to exercise any right or remedy shall be construed as a waiver of any right or remedy or of any default by Lessee hereunder. The acceptance by Lessor of Rent or any additional rent hereunder shall not be a waiver of any preceding breach or default by Lessee of any provision hereof, other then the failure of Lessee to pay the particular Rent accepted, regardless of Lessor's knowledge of such preceding breach or default at the time of acceptance of such rent, or a waiver of Lessor's right to exercise any remedy available to Lessor by virtue of such beech or default. The acceptance of any payment from a debtor in possession, a trustee, a receiver or any other person acting on behalf of Lessee or Lessee's estate shall not waive or cure a default under Section 12.1(e). (e) Lessor's Reentry. Lessee hereby irrevocably consents to Lessor's peaceable reentry, if Lessor so elects, to the Premises upon the occurrence of any of the events of default specified in Section 12.2 (a) (ii) above, including the expiration of any applicable cure period. (f) Lessor's Advances. In the event of any default by Lessee in the payment of money, other than Rent, or the performance of Lessee's obligations required under this Lease, and the expiration of any period expressly provided for herein for Lessee to cure said default after the delivery of notice by Lessor, in addition to the other Page 15 3 6'' 021 remedies herein granted to Lessor, Lessor may, but shall not be obligated to do so, and without waiving or releasing Lessee from any obligations of this Lease, make any payment and perform any other act on Lessee's part to be made or performed as provided in this Lease. All sums paid by Lessor and all necessary incidental costs, together with interest thereon at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum from the date of the payment by Lessor shall be payable by Lessee to Lessor on demand. The sums shall be deemed to be additional Rent and subject to the same consequences as herein provided for failure to pay Rent. 12.3 Default by Lessor. Lessor shall not be deemed to be in default in the performance of any obligation required to be performed by it hereunder unless and until it has failed to perform such obligation within thirty (30) days after written notice by Lessee to Lessor specifying in reasonable detail the nature and extent of any such failure; provided, however, that if the nature of Lessor's obligation is such that more than thirty (30) days are required for its performance, then Lessor shall not be deemed to be in default if it shall commence such performance within such thirty (30) day period and thereafter diligently prosecutes the same to completion. 12.4 Legal Expenses and Collection Costs. If either party incurs any expense, including actual costs of collection, reasonable attorneys' fees, expenses of discovery, preparation for litigation, expert witness fees and litigation expenses and costs, in connection with any action or proceeding instituted by either party by reason of any default or alleged default of the other party hereunder, the party prevailing in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its reasonable expenses from the other party. For purposes of this provision, in any unlawful detailed or other action or proceeding instituted by Lessor based upon any default or alleged default by Lessee hereunder, Lessor shall be deemed the prevailing party if (a) judgement is entered in favor of Lessor or (b) prior to trial or judgement Lessee shall pay the Rent and charges claimed by Lessor, or eliminate the condition(s), cease the act(s) or otherwise cure the omission(s) claimed by Lessor to constitute a default by Lessee hereunder. ARTICLE XIII. HOLDING OVER This Lease shall terminate and become null and void without further notice upon the expiration of the Term herein specified, and any holding over by Lessee after such expiration shall not constitute a renewal or extension hereof or give Lessee any rights under this Lease, except when in writing signed by both parties hereto. ARTICLE XIV. ACCESS BY LESSOR In addition to the right of Lessor to reserve use of the Facility under Article IV, Section 4.2, Lessor and those agents, contractors, servants and employees of Lessor who are identified in writing to Lessee shall have the right, after reasonable notice to Lessee, to enter the Premises during normal Page 16 363 G22 business hours (a) to examine the Premises, to perform any obligations of Lessor or to exercise any right or remedy reserved to Lessor in this Lease; (b) to exhibit the Premises to prospective purchasers, mortgagees or lessees of Lessor's interest therein; (c) to make such repairs as Lessor may be entitled to make after a default by Lessee under Article XII above; and (d) to take all materials into and upon the Premises that may be required in connection with such repairs, provided that any such entry shall be performed in such a manner that does not unreasonably interfere with Lessee's use of the Premises. If Lessor exercises its rights of entry in compliance with this Article XIV, such entry shall not constitute a constructive or actual eviction of Lessee, in whole or in part, and the Rent shall not abate while any such repairs are being made. If, during the last month of the Term, Lessee shall have removed all or substantially all of Lessee's property therefrom, Lessor may immediately enter and alter, renovate and redecorate the Premises without elimination or abatement of Rent and without other compensation and such action shall have no effect upon this Lease. Nothing herein contained, however, shall be deemed or construed to impose upon Lessor any obligation, responsibility or liability whatsoever for the care, supervision or repair of the Premises. ARTICLE XV. QUIET ENJOYMENT Upon payment by Lessee of the Rents provided herein, and upon the observance and performance of all of the covenants, terms and conditions on the part of Lessee to be performed hereunder, Lessor covenants and warrants that Lessee may peaceably and quietly hold and enjoy the Premises for the Term. ARTICLE XVL FURNITURE, FIXTURE, AND EQUIPMENT FINANCING It is contemplated that during the Term of this Lease, Lessee shall place or cause the placement from time to time of Furniture, Fixtures or Equipment (collectively "FF&E") on the Premises which shall be subject to lease and/or purchase financing encumbrances (collectively "FF&E" Financing). Prior to Lessee having the right to place any FF&E on the Premises subject to FF& E Financing, Lessee shall be required to deliver to Lessor written notice of any such proposed FF&E Financing at least sixty (60) days prior to the creation of such FF&E Financing, together with documentation in reasonable detail so that Lessor may review and approve or disapprove, in Lessor's reasonable discretion, the FF&E Financing. Such information shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (i) a complete description of the FF&E; (ii) the lease term, Rent payments and security deposits required in connection with any leasing of FF&E; (iii) the purchase price, terms of payment and conditions of any purchase or loan in connection with purchasing of FF&E; and (iv) copies of all relevant documents to be executed between Lessee and the lender, seller or lessor of the particular FF&E in question. For a period of thirty (30) days following receipt by Lessor of the notice from Lessee together with all of the information required above, Lessor may approve or disapprove such FF&E Financing by written notice to Lessee. Lessor's approval of any such FF&E Financing shall not be unreasonably withheld. In the event Lessor reasonably object to all or a portion of such FF&E Financing, Lessor shall within said thirty (30) day period give Lessee written notice of its objection, Page 17 19�Z 0IJ detailing the reasons thereof. In such event, Lessee shall be prohibited from entering into such FF&E Financing but Lessee may submit to Lessor such response to Lessor's objections and/or revisions to the terms and conditions of the FF&E Financing in order to satisfy Lessor's objections thereto. Any such newly submitted information shall again be subject to Lessor's thirty (30) day right to review and reasonably object thereto. Lessor's failure to timely object within said thirty (30) day period to any such proposed FF&E Financing for which proper notice has been given by Lessee to Lessor shall constitute approval of the particular FF&E Financing in question and no further approval by Lessor for such FF&E Financing shall be required. Lessor's rights hereunder shall not be construed as requiring Lessor to participate in any way in any such FF&E Financing nor shall approval by Lessor of any such FF&E Financing obligate Lessor in any manner. ARTICLE XVII. TAXES. Lessee shall be responsible for, and agrees to pay, prior to delinquency, any and all taxes, assessments, installments of taxes, levies, fees, and other governmental charges of every kind or nature (hereinafter collectively called "Taxes") in the event such Taxes are levied or assessed by municipal, county, state, federal, or other taxing or assessing authorities or governmental agencies or entities upon, against, or with respect to (i) the Premises or any portion thereof; (ii) all fixtures, equipment, and any other property of any kind owned by Lessee or placed, installed, or located within, upon, or about the Premises for which Lessor might be assessed or which might become a lien on the Premises if not paid by Lessee; (iii) all alterations, addition, and improvements of whatsoever kind or nature, if any, made to the Premises or the Improvements; (iv) rentals or other charges payable by Lessee to Lessor (other than state and federal income taxes applicable to Lessor); and (v) any other interest in the Premises (including the leasehold interest created by this Lease), irrespective of whether any of the items described in clauses (i) through (v) above are assessed as real or personal property, and irrespective of whether any of such items are assessed to or against Lessor, Lessee or any other person. ARTICLE XVIII. FORCE MAJEURE In the event the performance by either party of any of its obligations hereunder is delayed by reason of the act or neglect of the other party, act of God, stormy or inclement weather, strike, labor dispute, boycott, lockout or other like defensive action by such parry, inability to obtain labor or materials, governmental restrictions, riot, insurrections, war, catastrophe, casualty, act of the public enemy, or any other cause, whether similar or dissimilar, beyond the reasonable control of the party from whom such performance is due ("unavoidable delays"), the period for the commencement or completion thereof shall be extended for a period equal to the period during which performance is so delayed. Page 18 365 G24 ARTICLE IXX. MISCELLANEOUS 19.1 Waiver. The waiver by either Lessor or Lessee of any breach of any term, condition or covenant contained herein shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, condition or covenant or any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, condition or covenant contained herein. 19.2 Notices. All notices, demands or other writing to be made, given or sent hereunder, or which may be so given or made or sent by either Lessor or Lessee to the other shall be deemed to have been given when in writing and personally delivered or if mailed on the third (3`d) day after being deposited in the United States mail, certified or registered, postage prepaid, and addressed to the respective parties at their addresses set forth below: To Lessor: City of La Quinta PO. Box 1504 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 To Lessee: Family YMCA of the Desert 43-930 San Pablo Avenue Palm Desert, California 92260 19.3 Relationship of Parties. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed or construed by the parties hereto, nor by any third parry, as creating the relationship of principal and agent or of partnership or of joint venture between the parties hereto, it being understood and agreed that neither the method of computation of rent, nor any other provision contained herein, nor any acts of the parties herein, shall be deemed to create any relationship between the parties hereto other than the relationship of Lessor and Lessee. 19.4 Accord and Satisfaction. No payment by Lessee or receipt by Lessor of a lesser amount than the Rent or other charges herein stipulated shall be deemed to be other than on account of the earliest due stipulated Rent or other charges, nor shall any endorsement or statement on any check or any letter accompanying any check or payment as Rent or other charges be deemed an accord and satisfaction, and Lessor shall accept such check or payment without prejudice to Lessor's right to recover the balance of such Rent or other charges or pursue any other remedy in this Lease provided. 19.5 Time of Essence. Time is hereby expressly declared to be of the essence of this Lease and of each and every term, covenant and condition hereof which relates to a date or period of time. 19.6 Remedies Cumulative. The remedies herein given to Lessor and Lessee shall be cumulative and are given without impairing any other rights or remedies given Lessor and Lessee by statute or law now existing or hereafter enacted, and the exercise of any one(1) remedy by Lessor or Lessee shall not exclude the exercise of any other remedy. Page 19 3 6 f; 020 19.7 Effect of Invalidity. If any term or provision of this Lease or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Lease, or the application of its terms and provisions to persons and circumstances other than those to which it has been held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Lease shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. No acquisition by Lessor of all or any of the interest of Lessee in or to the Premises or the Improvements, and no acquisition by Lessee of all or any interest of Lessor in or to the Premises shall constitute or work a merger of the respective interest, unless expressly provided for. 19.8 Successors and Assiens. This Lease and the covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and shall apply to the successors and assigns of Lessor and to the permitted successors and assigns of Lessee, and all references in this Lease to "Lessee" or "Lessor" shall be deemed to refer to and include all permitted successors and assigns of such parry. 19.9 Entire Agreement. This Lease and the exhibits hereto contain the entire agreement of Lessor and Lessee with respect to the matters covered hereby, and no other agreement, statement of promise made by either Lessor or Lessee which is not contained herein, shall be valid or binding. No prior agreement, understanding or representation pertaining to any such matter shall be effective for any purpose. No provision of this Lease may be amended or added to except by an agreement in writing signed by Lessor and Lessee. 19.10Interest on Past -Due Obligations. Any amount due from Lessee to Lessor hereunder which is not paid when due (including, without limitation, amounts due as reimbursement to Lessor for costs incurred by Lessor in performing obligations of Lessee hereunder upon Lessee's failure to so perform) shall bear interest at the rate of ten (10%) percent from the date due until paid, unless otherwise specifically provided herein, but the payment of the interest shall not excuse or cure any default by Lessee under this Lease. 19.11 Execution of Lease: No Option. The submission of this Lease to Lessee shall be for examination purposes only, and does not and shall not constitute a reservation of or option for Lessee to lease, or otherwise create any interest by return to Lessor shall not be binding upon Lessor notwithstanding any time interval, until Lessor has in fact executed and delivered this Lease to Lessee. 19.12 Corporate Authority. Each individual executing this Lease on behalf of a corporation, nonprofit corporation, partnership or other entity or organizations, represents and warrants that he is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Lease on behalf of said corporation, partnership, entity or organization and that his Lease is binding upon same in accordance with its terms. Lessee shall, at Lessor's request, deliver a certified copy of its board of directors resolution or certificate authorizing or evidencing such execution. Page 20 3 G 19.13 Controlling Law. This Lease shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 19.14 Specific Performance. Nothing contained in this Lease shall be construed as or shall have the effect of abridging the right of either Lessor or Lessee to obtain specific performance of any and all of the covenants or obligations of the other party under this Lease. 19.15 Survival of Indemnities and Warranties. The obligations of the indemnifying party under each and every indemnification and hold harmless provision contained in this Lease shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease to and until the last to occur of (a) the last date permitted by law for the bringing of any claim or action with respect to which indemnification may be claimed by the indemnified party against the indemnifying party under such provision or (b) the date on which any claim or action for which indemnification may be claimed under such provision is fully and finally resolved, and, if applicable, any compromise thereof or judgement or award thereon is paid in full by the indemnifying party and the indemnified party is reimbursed by the indemnifying party for any amounts paid by the indemnified party in compromise thereof or upon judgment or award thereon and in defense of such action or claim, including reasonable attorneys' fees incurred. The representations, warranties, and covenants of the parties contained herein shall survive the termination of this Lease without regard to any investigation made by the parties. Page 21 368 C2i IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Lease as of the day and year above written. "LESSOR' CITY OF LA QUINTA Attest: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk Approved As To Form: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney SACommunity Services\NewDocs\1easeagree.wpd JOHN J. PENA, Mayor "LESSEE" FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT Its: Page 22 369 C,26 T4t!t 4 ZP Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 Consideration of Joint Use Agreement with the Boys and Girls Club of the Coachella Valley RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: 6- CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Funds have been identified in the proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2001-02 for the Boys and Girls Club Agreement with funding allocated in the amount of $30,000 from the City's General Fund and $30,000 from the City's annual CDBG allocation. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The Boys and Girls Club of Coachella Valley entered into a lease agreement on February 4, 1992 with the City of La Quinta to construct a facility for providing a variety of children's programs. On June 20, 1994, the facility began offering the programs. At the December 19, 1995 City Council meeting, the Council approved a Joint Use of Facility and Services Agreement with the Boys and Girls Club of Coachella Valley. The agreement term was from January 1, 1996 through June 30, 1996 for an amount not to exceed $30,000. Subsequently, the budgets for fiscal years 1996/97,1997/98,1998/99, 1999/2000, 2000/01 have contained $30,000 from the General Fund and $30,000 from the CDBG Fund. The Riverside County Economic Development Agency funds a portion of the agreement with CDBG funds. Because reports are required of the Boys and Girls Club of Coachella Valley in order to qualify for the CDBG funds, staff has incorporated the reporting requirements as a part of the agreement. 370 The proposed Agreement for 2001-02, provided as Attachment 2, will be effective July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002 with an amount not to exceed $60,000. The Agreement is divided into two components. The first component is for shared use of the Boys and Girls Club facility in La Quinta. The amount for this portion of the Agreement is $30,000 and provides the City with the ability to use the facility for programs operated Monday through Friday, 7:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., and Saturday and Sunday, 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. The facility offers a games room, gymnasium, cafeteria, computer room and craft room. The second component of the Agreement is for services provided by the Boys and Girls Club to the residents of La Quinta. The Boys and Girls Club would be contracted in the amount of $30,000 for Fiscal Year 2000/2001 to provide social recreation programs to children, 7 - 17 years of age. The social recreation program schedule is Monday through Friday 2:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. during the school year, and 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. during the summer months. Activities include table games, board games, clinics, tournaments, parties, and other programs designed for youth. These activities are funded by CDBG. On May 1, 2001, the Boys and Girls Club of the Coachella Valley received a Community Services Grant in the amount of $15,000 for maintenance and repair of the La Quinta unit. At that time, the Boys and Girls Club also asked for an additional $38,000 to complete the maintenance and repairs to the building. The City Council recommended that the request be considered during Fiscal Year 2001-02 budget discussions. During the discussion regarding the Community Services Grant request by the Boys and Girls Club at the May 1, 2001 City Council meeting, the subject of routine maintenance of the club was discussed, as provided in Attachment 1. The City Council asked to receive a copy of the maintenance plan once it has been finalized by the Boys and Girls Club Board of Directors. As outlined in the Joint Use Agreement, Section 1 .5.5, the facility is to be maintained in a neat and clean condition. Additional language has been included in the Joint Use Agreement regarding the maintenance of the facility, landscaping and trash enclosure. The additional language has been provided in bold text for the City Council's consideration. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve a Joint Use of Facility and Services Agreement with the Boys and Girls Club of Coachella Valley, La Quinta Unit and authorize staff to utilize the General Fund Account in the amount of $30,000, and CDBG Funds in the amount of $30,000 for the payments; or 2. Do not approve a Joint Use of Facility and Services Agreement with the Boys and Girls Club of Coachella Valley, La Quinta Unit; or S:\Community Services\CCReperts\CC.120.Boys and Girls Club.wpd 3 7 1 2. Do not approve a Joint Use of Facility and Services Agreement with the Boys and Girls Club of Coachella Valley, La Quinta Unit; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. ubmitted, munity Services Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Minutes of the May 1 City Council Meeting 2. Joint Use of Facility and Services Agreement S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC-.120.Boys and Girls Club.wpd 3 n 4- 003 ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Minutes 5 May 1, 2001 Council Member Sniff supported the Soroptimist's grant request for $1,700 and Council concurred. Council Member Perkins stated he felt organizations using City facilities should pay something for cleanup and suggested that be taken under consideration in future requests. Mayor Pena noted groups such as the Soroptimist give money back to the community. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to authorize a Community Services Grant for Soroptimist of La Quinta in the amount of $1,700 from the Special Projects Contingency Fund. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2001-53. In response to Council Member Sniff, Ms. Horvitz advised the Joint Use Agreement with the Boys & Girls Club does not spell out how the funds provided by the City will be used, with the exception of the CDBG funds. She has discussed use of the funds with Mr. Ducatte as well as the City's concern about maintenance of the facility and there is a verbal agreement that the funds will be used for maintenance. In response to Council Member Adolph, Ms. Horvitz explained the $30,000 funding in the Joint Use Agreement is for janitorial services and any funding requests for major maintenance is to be brought before the City for consideration. Mayor Pena stated the organization has expressed assurance that the facility will be better maintained in the future. Council Member Sniff expressed the need for the organization to have an ongoing maintenance fund. He suggested a grant amount of $10,000 with the balance of their request being considered during the budget process. Council Member Perkins concurred. Council Member Henderson stated she would support a $15,000 grant. Mayor Pena agreed but felt the organization should comply with the grant program requirements by submitting the proper application and financial statements. Council Member Sniff agreed. 373 005 City Council Minutes 6 May 1, 2001 Lucia Moran, 79-925 Westward Ho Drive, of Boys & Girls Club of Coachella Valley -La Quinta Unit, stated they are working on a complete business plan that will establish an ongoing maintenance and replacement fund. They are hoping to fund it with proceeds from a resale store and are forming an advisory council to look at issues specific to the La Quinta unit. She said they have already hired additional maintenance staff. Council Member Sniff commented on the deterioration of the facility and stated he wished to have some assurance of ongoing maintenance. Ms. Moran advised the business plan containing the ongoing maintenance program will be presented to the Board of Directors for approval. She added the Board of Directors had hoped to do the flooring improvements when the Club is closed for -a week in June but will adjust their schedule according to when the funds are available. Council Member Sniff asked for Council to be notified when the maintenance program is approved and implemented. In response to Mayor Pena, Jim Ducatte, of Boys & Girls Club of Coachella Valley -La Quinta Unit, stated he anticipates being back with a report by June 30. Council Member Henderson asked about the possibility of utilizing the Building Horizons program on the maintenance work and Mr. Ducatte noted school will be out in June. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to authorize a Community Services Grant for the Boys & Girls Club of Coachella Valley - La Quinta Unit in the amount of $15,000 from the Special Projects Contingency Fund contingent upon the City receiving a Community Services Grant Application and to consider the balance of the request during the budget process. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2001-54. 2. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY THE COACHELLA VALLEY ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP TO AMEND ITS BYLAWS IN REGARD TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. Management Analyst Wilson presented the staff report. Mayor Pena questioned CVEP being able to enforce a confidentially agreement. 374 006 ATTACHMENT 2 JOINT USE OF FACILITY AND SERVICES AGREEMENT Boys and Girls Club of Coachella Valley, La Quinta Unit THIS AGREEMENT FOR JOINT USE OF FACILITY AND SERVICES AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation (the "City') and the BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY, LA QUINTA UNIT, a nonprofit organization (the "Club"). WHEREAS, the CITY and the CLUB have entered into that certain lease agreement titled BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY/LA QUINTA LEASE AGREEMENT (the "Lease Agreement" dated February 4, 1992); and WHEREAS, the CITY and the CLUB desire to implement in more detail Section 4.1 of the Lease Agreement regarding the ability of the CITY to utilize the facility constructed pursuant to the Lease Agreement by the Club (the "Facility'); and WHEREAS, the CITY has entered into a joint use agreement with the Coachella Valley Boys and Girls Club, La Quinta Unit previously (the "Joint Use of Facility and Services Agreement' dated December 20, 1995); and WHEREAS, the CITY desires to assist the CLUB in providing social recreation opportunities for the residents of La Quinta; and WHEREAS, the City finds that the proposed joint use of the Facility and the continuation of such services provide a significant public benefit to the citizens of the City: The Parties hereto agree as follows: 1.0 SHARED USE OF FACILITY 1.1 Grant of Use. Except for those office areas identified as reserved in Section 1.3 below, the Club hereby grants to the City for a term beginning July 1, 2001 to June 30, 2002, the license to enter upon, occupy, use and operate, according to the terms, conditions and covenants herein contained, the Facility during the time frame set out for City use in Section 1.2 below. 1.2 Schedule for Facility Use. 1.2.1 Basic Schedule for City Use ("City Time"). Monday through Friday 7:30 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. (School Hours) Monday through Friday 5:30 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. (Summer Hours) Saturday and Sundays 9:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. 1.2.2 Quarterly Schedule Review. The Club and the City shall meet and confer S:/Community Services/Boys & Girls Club Agreement 2001-02 C,6 at least quarterly to discuss their programming plans and avoid duplication of services as both Parties agree is reasonable. The City shall implement a permanent program plan within 60 days from the date of this Agreement, and maintain said plan in accordance with its terms. 1.2.3 Duty to Permit Other Group Use. During such periods of City Time not otherwise conceded to the Club that the City does not have a proposed organized group use of the Facility, or of any particular room thereof ("Unused Time Slots"), City shall grant permits to public benefit groups and private benefit groups from the community requesting to use the Facility or Facility rooms as City deems most appropriate giving due consideration to the following guidelines and priorities: (1) A group that proposes a benefit to youth should have priority to a group that proposes a benefit to non -youth; (2) A group that proposes a benefit to more La Quinta residents should have a priority over a group that proposes a benefit to fewer La Quinta residents; (3) A group that proposes a use of greater public benefit to a larger number of people should have priority over a group that proposes a use with a lesser public benefit or to a lesser number of people; (4) A group posing a lesser risk of injury to persons or property should be given priority over a group that poses a greater risk of injury to persons or property; (5) The order in which the request for usage was received. 1.2.4 Duty to Supervise. During all such times as all or part of the Facility is permitted by the City to be used by one or more community groups as herein permitted, the City shall provide competent, on -site supervision of said group by an appropriate contingent of responsible adults, & such appropriate security therefore necessary to prevent property damage or intentional personal injury. 1.2.5 Liability for Damage. Property and Personal Injury. City shall be liable for all property damage and personal injury that occurs solely as a result of actions by its permittee or their guests or attendees, and shall hold the Club harmless from any and all such liability. 1.2.6 Specific Violations of Facility Use. Without limitation as to other possible violations of the Facility Use, the City shall specifically not permit the following uses: 1.2.6.1 Political Activities. City shall abide by Club's facility use policies and shall not permit or tolerate the use of the Facility for campaigning or otherwise working for the nomination or election of any individual to any public office, partisan or nonpartisan, or for any ballot measure, including any initiative, referendum, or advisory vote, except with the advance written permission of the Club, as a forum for open public debate by candidates on the condition that no member of the public shall be excluded therefrom. 1.2.6.2 Alcohol, Drugs or Tobacco. City shall abide by Club's facility use policies and not allow alcohol, illegal drugs, or tobacco to be sold, used or consumed in, on or about the Facility. City shall not permit or allow any portion of the Facility to be rented or utilized by any person, group or company that intends to provide alcoholic beverages at an event or meeting. The City shall make these facts known, in writing and through oral communications, to all staff members and participants at the Facility. 1.3 Reserved Areas. &/Community Services/Boys & Girls Club Agreement 2001-02 376 008 1.3.1 Club Office Areas. Excepted from the license herein granted is the area of the Club's office. 1.3.2 Storage Areas. Excepted from the license herein granted is the area of the Club's storage for games and supplies which is hereby specifically reserved and granted to the exclusive and full time use of the Club during the term of this Agreement. License is granted to the City by the Club for a term that is conterminous with the right of the City to use and operate the Facility, unless sooner terminated by the Club or 30 days written notice, for the full time and exclusive use of the small storage room off of the gymnasium in the Facility. 1.4 License Fee, 1.4.1 Basic License Fee. For the Basic License Fee the City shall make four quarterly payments of $7,500 each on July 31, 2001, October 13, 2001, January 19, 2002 and April 13, 2002, for a total amount not to exceed thirty thousand dollars. 1.5 Operations, 1.5.1 Fees. City may charge attendance fees to its invitees and users. 1.5.2 Log Book. All parties shall keep, maintain and permit the inspection by all other parties of, a joint log book in a form approved by the Club and the City in which the City and the Club shall maintain a record of acts of vandalism, repairs, incidents of graffiti, and other major incidents. 1.5.3 Procedure Training. City shall cause and train its employees to comply with procedures in a manual ("Procedures Manual") the Club prepares regarding utility turn-offs, alarm responses, locking up/closing, key distribution, facility damage (including graffiti reporting). 1.5.4 Key Provision. Parties will coordinate on providing keys and lock up procedures and use of the alarm system. 1.5.5 Maintenance. Except for conditions which may be corrected by normal janitorial services, all Parties shall leave the Facility at the conclusion of their daily time allotment in a neat and clean condition and one that does not impose any additional duty on the janitorial and custodial services staff, or upon the next occupant of the Facility. The Facility shall be kept and maintained in a clean, sanitary and safe condition as established by the Club. The Club shall also be responsible for acceptable maintenance of all landscape areas, playgrounds, parking lots and trash enclosure. 1.5.6 Long Term Maintenance Plan. The Parties agree to develop a long term maintenance plan during the twelve month term of this agreement to address an equitable cost sharing approach to non -routine maintenance issues such as floor resealing, building painting, etc., which would be put into effect in subsequent agreements. 1.6 Indemnity for Shared Use. Reciprocal Indemnity for Invitee's, Employee's or Trespasser's Personal and Property Injuries Not Caused by Design, Construction, Maintenance or Repair. Each Party ("Indemnifying Party") indemnifies each other Party ("Indemnified Party"), holds the Indemnified Party harmless, and agrees to defend the Indemnified party against loss, damage or liability on a claim, the adverse judgment, adverse order on, or good faith settlement of, such a claim, including &/Community Services/Boys & Girls Club Agreement 2001-02 3 377 009 attorneys fees and court costs in defending such claim, suffered by an Indemnified Party due to personal injury to, or damage to the property of, an invitee (including a permittee) of an Indemnified Party ("Indemnified's Invitee"), an employee ("Indemnified's Employee") of an Indemnified Party, or to a trespasser or other uninvited person, at the Facility (except to the extent that said claims based on an act or omission of design, construction, including building materials, maintenance or non -maintenance, repair or non -repair by the Indemnifying Party) primarily caused by the act or omission of the Indemnifying Party, their employees or invitees. 2.0 SERVICES OF THE CLUB 2.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Club shall continue to provide social recreation programs to the children of La Quinta according to the following schedule: July 1, 2001 - August 31, 2001 Monday through Friday 7:30 - 5:30 p.m. September 4, 2001-December 14, 2001 Monday through Friday 2:00 - 7:30 p.m. December 17, 2001-December 31, 2001 Monday through Friday 7:30 - 5:30 p.m. January 2, 2002 - June 14, 2002 Monday through Friday 2:00 - 7:30 p.m. June 17, 2002 - June 28, 2002 Monday through Friday 7:30 - 5:30 p.m. Excluding any days off for observance of Boys and Girls Club holiday schedule. The Social Recreation program is to include but not limited to table games, board games, game technique clinics, tournaments, holiday parties and provide other opportunities for fun and constructive use of children's leisure time. The Club is required by this agreement to be familiar with and comply with the Community Development regulations and adhere to the polices contained in Exhibit A and Exhibit B. The Club understands and agrees to that no waiver or exception can be granted to the CDBG policies except with express written consent of the City. 2.2 Contractor's Proposal. (Not Applicable to this Agreement) 2.3 Compliance with Law. All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, regulations and laws of the City of La Quinta and any federal, state or local governmental agency of competent jurisdiction. 2.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Club shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. The Club shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. S:/Community ServicesBoys & Girls Club Agreement 2001-02 4 3 / 8 010 3.0 COMPENSATION 3.1 Contract Sum. For the services rendered by Club pursuant to this section of the Agreement, the City shall compensate the Club in the sum not to exceed Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000), to be distributed to the Club according to the payment schedule set forth in paragraph 3.2. It is the understanding of the Club and the City that Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds will be use to fund this portion of the contract. The sum of Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000), is contingent upon the Club completing the necessary reporting documents required by the Riverside County CDBG program. 3.2 Payment Schedule. For the term of this Agreement, payments will be made to the Club according to the following schedule: Contract Sum Payment Date $7,500 July 31, 2001 $7,500 October 13, 2001 $7,500 January 19, 2002 $7,500 April 13, 2002 4.0 PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 4.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. 4.2 Schedule of Performance. All services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed diligently and within the time period established in the Scope of Services and Schedule of Performance. Extensions to the time period specified in the Scope of Services and Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer. CDBG reporting forms must be filed in a timely manner in compliance with CDBG reporting timelines. Should the Club fail to perform or complete the necessary CDBG reports, the City will withhold payment of funds until the performance deficiency is remedied. 4.3 Force Majeure. (Not applicable to this Agreement) 4.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Section 8.8 of this Agreement, the term of this Agreement shall be for twelve (12) months from July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001. 5.0 COORDINATION OF WORK 5.1 Representative of Club. The following principals of the Club are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of the Club authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: &/Community Services/Boys & Girls Club Agreement 2001-02 5 379 611 a. Jim Ducatte, Executive Director b. Judy Vossler, President C. Dennis Modrich, Vice President d. Bob Frame, Vice President d. Gina Leslie, Treasurer e. Brian Harnick, Secretary 5.2 Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be the City Manager or such other person as may be designated by the City Manager of City. It shall be the Club's responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Club shall refer any decisions which must be made by the City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of the City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. 5.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the Club, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Club shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be assigned or transferred, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of the City. 5.4 Independent Contractor. Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which the Club, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth. The Club shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of the City and shall remain at all times as to the City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. The Club shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of the City. 6.0 INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION 6.1 Insurance. The Club shall cant' general liability and property damage insurance against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property resulting from the Club's act or omissions arising out of or related to the Club's performance under this Agreement in an amount equal as specified in Lease agreement. The City shall be named as additionally insured to the policy and a certificate to that effect shall be delivered to the City prior to the payment of the first installment under Section 3.2 above. Such insurance shall be kept in effect during the tern of this Agreement and shall not be cancelable without thirty (30) days written notice of proposed cancellation to the City. 6.2 Indemnification. The Club shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, representatives and agents, from and against any and all actions, suits, proceedings, claims, demands, losses, costs, and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys' fees, for injury to or death of person(s), for damage to property and for errors and omissions committed by the Club, its officers, employees and agents, arising directly or indirectly out of or related to the Club's performance under this Agreement, except to the extent of such loss as may be caused by the City's own negligence or that of its officers or employees. 6.3 Performance Bond. (Not Applicable to this Agreement) S:/Community Services/Boys & Girls Club Agreement 2001-02 3 U , + 012 6.4 Payment Bond. (Not Applicable to this Agreement) 6.5 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies the City may have if the Club fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City may, at its sole option: 1. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement. Order the Club to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to the Club hereunder until the Club demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 3. Terminate this Agreement. Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to any other remedies the City may have and are not the exclusive remedies for the Club's failure to maintain or secure appropriate policies or endorsements. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which the Club may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from the Club's or its employees or agents in their performance, under this Agreement. 7.0 REPORTS 7.1 Reports. The Club shall prepare and submit to the Contract Officer a monthly report of attendance concerning the services as outlined in Scope of Services. In addition, a progress report, including an accounting of expenditures, shall be provided on or about January 15, 2001 and June 15, 2001. The Club shall prepare reports and intake forms as required by the Riverside County CDBG program. 7.2 Record Retention Clause. The Club shall maintain and keep books and records on a current basis, recording all transactions pertaining to this agreement in a form in accordance with generally acceptable accounting principles. Said books and records shall be made available to the County, State of California, the Federal government, the City of La Quinta-Contract Officer or designee thereof, and to any authorized representative thereof for the purposes of audit at all reasonable times and places. All such books and records shall be retained for such periods of time as required by law, provided, however, notwithstanding any shorter periods of retention, all books, records, and supporting detail shall be retained for a period of at least three (3) years after the expiration of the term of this Agreement. 7.3 Community Development Block Grant Funding, The Club agrees to comply with the reporting processes of the Riverside County CDBG program in order to document the program meets a National Objective by serving limited clientele - all persons (100%) served by the services outlined in the Scope of Service shall be of low or moderate income. 8.0 ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT &/Community Services/Boys & Girls Club Agreement 2001-02 38 013 8.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be construed, interpreted and governed as to validity, performance of the parties and enforcement in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and the Club covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. 8.2 Disputes. In the event of any dispute arising under this Agreement, the injured party shall notify the injuring party in writing of its contentions by submitting a claim therefor. The injured party shall continue performing its obligations hereunder so long as the injuring party commences to cure such default within ten (10) days of service of such notice and completes the cure of such default within forty-five (45) days after service of the notice, or such longer period as may be permitted by the Contract Officer; provided that if the default is an immediate danger to the health, safety and general welfare, the City may take such immediate action as the City deems warranted. Compliance with the provisions of this Section shall be a condition precedent to termination of this Agreement for cause and to any legal action, and such compliance shall not be a waiver of any party's right to take legal action in the event that the dispute is not cured, provided that nothing herein shall limit the City's right to terminate this Agreement without cause pursuant to Section 6.3. 8.3 Retention of Funds. The City may withhold from any monies payable to the Club, sufficient funds to compensate the City for any losses, costs, liabilities or damages it reasonably believes were suffered by the City due to the default of the Club in the performance of the services required by this Agreement. 8.4 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non - defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. The City's consent or approval of any act by the Club requiring the City's consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the City's consent to or approval of any subsequent act of the Club. Any waiver by either party or any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 8.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 8.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, at law or at equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. 8.7 Liquidated Damages. (Not Applicable to this Agreement) 8.8 Termination Prior To Expiration Of Term. This section shall govern any termination of this Agreement, except for termination by the City for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days written notice to the Club. S:/Community Services/Boys & Girls Club Agreement 2001-02 3 8 11 G14 8.9 Attorneys' Fees. If either Party commences an action against the other Party arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs from the losing Party. 9.0 CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES; NON-DISCRIMINATION 9.1 Non -liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Club, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Club or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 9.2 Conflict of Interest. No officer or employee of the City shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which effects his personal interest or the interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any state statute or regulation. The Club warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement. 9.3 Covenant Against Discrimination. The Club covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. The Club shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry. 10.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 10.1 Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail to the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty-eight (48) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section 9.1. To City: To Club: CITY OF LA QUINTA COACHELLA VALLEY BOYS 78-495 Calle Tampico AND GIRLS CLUB, LA QUINTA UNIT La Quinta, California 92253 42-600 Cook Street, Suite 120 Attention: City Manager Palm Desert, California 92211 10.2 Integrated Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the parties and all previous understandings, negotiations and agreements are integrated into and superseded by this Agreement. &/Community Services/Boys & Girls Club Agreement 2001-02 O 383 015 10.3 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the parties by an instrument in writing signed by both parties. 10.4 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not effect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder. 10.5 Authori1y. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that by so executing this Agreement the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. 10.6 Lease, The Lease Agreement shall remain in effect according to its terms. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates stated below. Dated: ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney Dated: CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California Municipal Corporation By: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor "CITY" BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY, LA QUINTA UNIT, a nonprofit organization IRS Tax Exempt N By: Name: Title: "CLUB" &/Community Services/Boys & Girls Club Agreement 2001-02 384 10 016 I COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Donation of Art Piece by Aedwyn Darroll RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Should the City Council accept the donation of the art piece, the piece will need to be moved from the current location on Madison Street to the location deemed appropriate by the City Council. Relocation of the art piece is anticipated to not exceed $10,000. This cost includes all equipment needed to remove and re -install the art piece as well as the footings needed for the piece at the new location. The art piece is in need of repainting, which is estimated to cost $5,000. For both the relocation and repainting of the art piece, a total amount up to $15,000 would be required. These costs may be funded by the Art in Public Places Account which had a balance of $230,000 as of May 30, 2001. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: nem BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: On June 1, 2001, Ms. Susan Barney met with staff to discuss the possibility of a donation from artist Aedwyn Darroll to the City of La Quinta. Mr. Darroll would like to donate a sculpture entitled "Walk -Through Rainbow" to the City, for possible placement at Fritz Burns Park. Details of the proposed donation as well as a photograph of the art work is provided as Attachment 1. Should the City Council accept the donation of the art piece, Ms. Barney has recommended that the piece be displayed at Fritz Burns Park, north of the tennis courts on Avenue 52. However, other locations may be considered by the City Council. 385 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving the acceptance of the donation of the art piece "Walk -Through Rainbow" to be installed at Fritz Burns Park and authorize an expenditure of up to $15,000 from the Art in Public Places Account for relocation and repainting of the art piece; or 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving the acceptance of the donation of the art piece "Walk -Through Rainbow" to be installed at another location and authorize an expenditure of up to $15,000 from the Art in Public Places Account for relocation and repainting of the art piece; or 3. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving the acceptance of the art piece "Walk -Through Rainbow"; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Dodie Horviti,' Co?pmunity Services Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Information from Ms. Barney Regarding Art Piece Donation i� S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC. 124.Darroll Art Piece Donation. wpd 002 RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ACCEPTING A GIFT WHEREAS, on June 19, 2001, Aedwyn Darroll generously donated a art piece to be displayed in a public location; and WHEREAS, the art piece was donated to the City of La Quinta and was not given to or limited to the use of any particular employee or official; and, WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of La Quinta to accept the donation and to authorize the placement of the art piece at Fritz Burns Park. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does hereby RESOLVE as follows: 1. The City of La Quinta hereby accepts the donation of an art piece by Aedwyn Darroll. 2. The art piece is to placed at Fritz Burns Park, north of the tennis courts on Avenue 52. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 19`h day of June, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 387 S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.124.Darrol1 Art Piece Donation.wpd 6 0 J ATTEST: JUNE GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 10 S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.124.Darrol1 Art Piece Donation.wpd 00 4 ATTACHMENT 1 May 29, 2001 Dodie Horvitz Community Services Director Community Services, City of La Quinta Dear Ms. Horvitz As per conversations with Terry Henderson, I am writing to you in regards to the matter of a donation of the large Outdoor Sculpture 'Walk -Through Rainbow" currently located at 57-325 Madison Street. In conversations with the artist, Aedwyn Darroll, I suggested that this particular piece be donated to the City of La Quinta for one of their Public parks and/or spaces. Aedwyn is extremely enthusiastic about such a donation, and would love to see the sculpture in a location where everyone would have access to it. Aedwyn has asked me to pursue this on his behalf. And be his liaison in this matter. To follow are the pertinent details of the piece for your consideration. Name: "Walk -Through Rainbow' Artist: Aedwyn Darroll Description: Free Standing steel sculpture of arches increasing in size and painted with high quality paint to represent color spectrum Size: 10 ft. H x 20 ft. Wx19ft. L Condition: Sculpture is structurally sound and in steel is in good condition. Paint needs to be retouched/refinished to return color to original state. I am enclosing a photograph of the piece as it is and have a selection of 35mm slides on hand of the piece in its original condition. You may reach me by telephone at: Home: 564.7236 Cell Ph: 899.8958 Mailing Address: 57-325 Madison Street, La Quinta Ca 92253 or via email at webmaster®virtualcgi.com Thank you for your consideration and time. Yours sincerely, Susan P. Barney 389 006 390 00 Tity/ 4 ZP Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: / COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: _ Consideration of a Meeting Schedule Regarding Vista Santa Rosa RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the May 24, 2001 LAFCO public hearing, the Vista Santa Rosa Community of Interest (COI) application was continued to August 30, 2001, to allow the City of La Quinta, proponents, and opponents of the Vista Santa Rosa COI to meet and resolve their concerns. The City Council at their June 5, 2001 meeting, under Reports and Informational Items, raised the issue of scheduling meeting dates with the Vista Santa Rosa COI members pursuant to LAFCO's direction at the May 24, 2001 public hearing. In addition, Council also directed staff to attend the Vista Santa Rosa Community Council meetings. Staff attended the Vista Santa Rosa Community Council on Thursday, June 7, at 6:00 p.m. held at the Westside School. On the agenda under Business Items was the issue of Annexation and the Community of Interest. During discussion of this item, various members of the Community Council and audience spoke regarding their concerns in opposition to, or support of the COI. At the conclusion of this item, the Community Council created three committees to gather information to be presented at their July 12, 2001, 6:00 p.m. meeting. 391 G:\W PDOCS\ccjhGP12.wpd On Monday, June 11, 2001, staff met with two members of one of the committees: Jerry Lugo and JoAnn Bolduc Foxx. The charge of this committee was to assemble information as to the annexation process, status of the City's annexation application and the General Plan and Prezoning for the area. Staff provided them with general information relating to the these issues. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Provide staff with meeting dates and determine who should attend; or 2. Provide alternative direction. Respectfully submitted Development Director Approved for submission by: TXe homas P. Genovese, City Manager 399 G:\W PDOCS\ccjhGP12.wpd COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 Consideration of Location of a Third Fire Station to Serve Northern Portions of the City AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: 9 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Select a site for the City's third fire station and authorize staff to include monies from the Infrastructure Fund in the 2001 /02 Capital Improvement Budget for the building design and land acquisition. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: There are no immediate fiscal implications associated with the selection of a site for the City's third fire station. The estimated cost to design, construct, furnish, and provide an engine for a station is approximately $2,000,000 not including land. Staff is proposing transferring $1.4 million in Infrastructure Funds to assist in funding the proposed station. The location would be in RDA Project Area 2. In addition, staff is proposing to loan $1 million from Project Area 2 to accelerate the construction of the station (if Project Area 2 funding is not available, General Fund funding would have to be advanced)• This would bring the total funding available to $2.4 million ($2 million for design, construction, furnishings, including the engine and $400,000 for land). In the near future staff will present to the City Council, for its consideration, an amended Developer Impact Fee report which will propose that $1 million of costs associated with the new station ($2.4 million less the $1 .4 million already paid by developers through the Infrastructure Fund) be included in the Developer Impact Fee. If the Fee is implemented, based upon issuing 300 single family permits annually, the Fire DIF would repay RDA Project Area 2 in Fiscal Year 2032/2033. Since all of the parcels of land which are owned by the Agency are less than $400,000, if one of them is selected for the location of the third station, the DIF would be reduced accordingly. 393 None. There are currently two fire stations within the City limits of La Quinta; Station 32 in the Cove area, and Station 70 at PGA West. Northern portions of the City are served by stations in Indio and Indian Wells. Attachment 1 depicts the locations of the aforementioned fire stations serving La Quinta. The circle around each station approximates a five minute response area. Attachment 2 also depicts the area that was formerly served by Station 31 before it was downgraded to a volunteer only station by the County several months ago. Recently, in response to concerns voiced by some Bermuda Dunes citizens, there has been some discussion at the County level regarding re -opening that station, but at this point its future is uncertain. As the Attachments show, the majority of the northern portion of the City is outside the five minute response time of any station. It is acknowledged that a new station is needed to serve that rapidly growing area. Optimally the Fire Department would like to have a 2 acre site for the station; however, one and one half acres could suffice. The City/RDA own three parcels of land in the northern portion of the City that could accommodate a fire station. Those sites are depicted with the approximate five minute response time area in the following Attachments: 1. Miles and Seeley Drive, 55 acres (Attachments 3 and 3A) 2. Adams and 47t', 10 acres, (Attachments 4 and 4A) 3. Adams and 48', approximately 34 acres, (Attachments 5 and 5A) At the January 2, 2001 Study Session discussion of the Community Park design, staff was directed to eliminate the Westward Ho and Adams park site as a possible location for a future fire station. At the April 17, 2001 Redevelopment Agency meeting, the Agency entered into an agreement with Presbyterian Homes to develop the entire ten acre site at Adams and 47" with senior housing. It may be possible to renegotiate the agreement and reserve two acres of land for a station if the City Council so directs. 394 G'- 2 CDF staff has expressed a preference for the Miles and Seeley site for the reasons contained in Attachment 6, although they acknowledge that Adams and 47`h or a parcel in the commercial area north of Hwy 111 would be adequate. CDF does not think that the Adams and 48`h location would allow adequate response times. The following depicts some of advantages and disadvantages of each site. Miles and Seeley Drive Advantages: • North of the wash* • Better regional coverage • Estimated land cost for 2 acres for reimbursement to the RDA, $72,000 • Already owned by the RDA Disadvantages: • Does not provide optimum coverage area within the City limits • Estimated 40% of calls would be to locations outside of City limits Adams and 47"' Advantages : • Provides optimum coverage for area within City limits • Provides adequate regional coverage • Rapid access to Hwy 111 Corridor • Estimated land cost for 2 acres for reimbursement to the RDA, $106, 000 • Already owned by RDA Disadvantages: • Located south of the wash* • An agreement exists to develop senior housing on the site and would have to be renegotiated 395 Adams and 481h Advantages: • Adequate access to Hwy 111 Corridor • Estimated land cost for 2 acres for reimbursement to the RDA, $82,000 • Land already owned by the RDA Disadvantages • Located south of the wash* • Does not provide adequate regional coverage • Does not provide adequate coverage to northern most portions of the City * Although station location in relation to the wash has been listed as a factor in site selection, it should be noted that by the time the station is completed there will be two bridge crossings (Washington and Jefferson) that may be utilized during flood conditions. It should also be noted that the low water crossing at Adams may be utilized if the aforementioned bridges have been damaged by seismic activity. Therefore, the only time that the location on either side of the wash would be a critical issue is during a combination flood/seismic event scenario. As an alternative to the above locations, the City Council may wish to direct staff to look for alternate sites not already owned by the Agency. Although they are of limited availability, staff estimates the current cost of commercial property to be within $5 and $11 per foot ($436,000 to $958,000 for a two acre parcel) depending on the proximity to Hwy 111. The City Council may also direct staff to locate and negotiate for a residential parcel(s) in the northern portion of the City to build a station. Market value for residential vacant land is estimated at $2 a square foot ($175,000 for a two acre site). CDF and County Fire staff will be present at the meeting to answer any questions the City Council may have regarding this issue. 396 004 121010m, evvil 1 i i 1 The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Select a site (from one of the three already owned by the Agency) for the City's third fire station and authorize staff to include monies from the Infrastructure Fund in the 2001 /02 Capital Improvement Budget for the building design and land acquisition; or 2. Direct staff to identify and negotiate for an alternate site not already owned by the Agency for the location of a third fire station for the northern portion of the City and include monies from the Infrastructure Fund in the 2001/02 Capital Improvement Budget for the building design and land acquisition; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, C -kA Tom Hartung, Direo or of Building and Safety ( A�/kroved for submissio y: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Map showing response areas of current fire stations 2. Map showing response areas of current stations and area formerly covered by Station 31 3. Map showing proposed coverage area of station located at Miles Ave and Seeley Dr. 3A. Parcel map Miles and Seeley Dr. 4. Map showing proposed coverage area of station located at Adams and 47" 4A. Parcel map Adams and 47`h 5. Map showing proposed coverage area of station located at Adams and 481h 5A. Parcel map Adams and 48`h 6. Letter from Chief McLaughlin listing site preferences 397 ATTACHMENT 1 Ih is NOS�I�dl o m W � b e rtr'. MONROE ST - u f 00 ¢` BUPR 5T F 'm JEFFER-ONST-. Z - WASHITATON ST a cm �. w AVENUE BERMUDAS Q - act a3MOHN3SI3 dlddPS.3(.lN3AV OCOA4IS pQ� M, T � ti z V Y � H Q 1S )100� 393 I 7 ATTACHMENT 2 _ ..: IS NOS)I.)Vr 0 ..- z w MONROE ST a N r uD 4. Q 6,. Q v v Q m w: ¢: BURG ST FZ c, JEFFERSON ST s t p a I WASHINGTON ST zo 4 ui , 4,1p m Ta Q Ay - r Q i Q LL is )IOW AVENUE 0' 21(,` nmoHN3SL3 V2RI3S 3nN3AV zVIQ 3nN3AK' 399 ATTACHMENT 3 40011 9 0 6f a, OJ 23 020-011 Proposed Station 4s $ 76 9a IX38 1 C r N 10IA CL) PAfl2 r _ O � PARI Il � 23 IX E 37 c 3/ • l 9 '.. - M....T _ u• R xnIX SL �A.-AA _ -— _ 6686 AC NT uY !� "ENDITER 8 w' cMWVEl c JZ. — 1j uvn `a' _) L1J . GvouN .> Sons,a ` 'W, v x 05 QowrA crn. ru eRwwa au vQIE Rb A6 R6^ 2 BA aP, Ar nos 43 _�- l � y CQ 12 ti 24 yf ho°° o ADD 2 6 43 + t�R 643 15 02 DATA 611-e As o@L RS i gi: RS V'l5: RS llPl n 11/la: RS V8: RS NM, SIRR'B YAP BK604 PG04 vaside County. Calif. MY WE IWIN NB W JI0-15 PARCEL WN NO. 28833 San 2000 ATTACHMENT 3 A 401 fJO SEC.30 T.§S.,R.7E o2 T.R.A. 020-042 CITY OF LI OUINTA 020-024 016-043 016-002 19 Proposed Senior Housing 020-043 21 r6s Huss ,anm IOTII a 'mxsa LOT ff +>o 0266 I6 Tx 24"D 21 g 26 Q F £ 4 pl mnz ___ _ 15 Td 10,.; 14 wnM 3 1.� i r� 3 � t PAk2 IM EE VO I (LAKE) i a Existing Residences WNA ---41R--- 09 25 I I I I l I ll § I 21 20 .* Ik 3 I I I I I 646 10 U 2 3 > L r-- — — i34) 1 < 14 it O j 13 > 4 29 WT 68 31 32 64fi 35 I me ae uuu 64fi UB 214/69-82 TRACT 24230 I; 38 NB 227/77-78 TRACT 26152 I MAN t PM 79/58-59 PARCEL NAP 15772 AUG m' Jul 2000 ATTACHMENT 4 A 1:12 ATTACHMENT 5 X V- BL z MOASIS CLUB V Ay' z i 19 NOS)0Yr ci? MONROE� OD ZF ST N ST WASHING1 ui U) > D IC > T ST AVENUE IN3SI3 Vdd3S-:3nN3NV 404 1.13 lOTC war aas]Ac 1 PAR 66 PAR s P632 " , 79 E 60 R 4.Ac 643 3"Aa LOTA a P 3 " PAR 8 awul ne.o° ee 62 m 61 rRA 020-720 p 67 a]9]1 00] 3. MMe N I TRA 82"n Apartments 9 �i R 34 O ex f to 6 - 13.85 AC ]e.m ].c Q) Or C °xNN 1� 4' w I Proposed Station e I 30 4 ; + 70OA .,° l ]N.1] 6BV —I4L 643 31 32�r------------- + - - - - - -- 14 DATA: R5S 7 7O �R99/985 _ PM 37 RS N/S73 �, , ' RR55 95%!y -PM ASSESSOR'S 19AnKH9-RG13 4 3 38 PM Riverside County, Coli(. SIAR RX I"IV-in / PM 50' RDS 32632 4/59 ATTACHMENT 5 A 405 14 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT /n cooperation with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection 210 West San Jacinto Avenue • Perris, California 92570 • (909) 940-6900(. FexA?09) 940-6910 Tom Tisdale June 15, 2001 ATTACHMENT 6 Fire Chief - -•`....,,vim Nlv4' SH•-F- '. Proudly serving the unincorporated Tom Genovese, City Manager areas of Riverside City of La Quinta County and f the cities o 78-295 Calee Tampico P La Quinta, California 92253 Banning Beamnont Dear Tom: e• cal P. Per your request and for City Council consideration, I am providing the Fire Canyon, Lake Department's preference for fire station sites to serve north La Quinta. Realizing the importance for the city to provide the highest level of fire Desert Hot springs protection to all citizens, we feel a North La Quinta fire station will achieve this Indian wells goal. A two -acre site is preferred but the minimum size would be 1.5 acres. 0. ( The sites below are listed in order of preference. Indio eft Lake Elsinore 1. Miles Avenue and Seeley Drive: Q.,;nr8 ■ Ideal for five (5) minute responses to north La Quinta including portions north of Fred Waring Drive between Adams and Washington Avenue, Moreno Valley ■ Well located for responses to the commercial corridor along Highway P"�Desert • Provides a station on the north side of Whitewater Channel if the area Perris becomes isolated due to seismic activity or flooding, ■ Best site for participation in regional fire protection system; Rancho Mirage San Jacinto 2. North side of Highway 111 between Washington and Jefferson Temecula ■ Provides coverage for areas of new commercial development, ■ Rapid access to High 111 corridor and five (5) minute response to residential area north of Highway 111 except to the northeast comer of e°ara°fs"°e 's°" the city north of Fred Waring, Bob Buster, ■ Adequate location for regional fire protection system, District I ■ Location is south of Whitewater Channel which could restrict or delay John Tavaglione, responses during flooding or other disasters. District 2 ■ Site in commercial area generally not objected to by neighbors, ■ Response from station may be impeded by traffic and lack of immediate Jun V��District 3 access to a major street; Roy Wilson, District 4 Tom Mullen, District 5 406 ';15 La Quinta Fire Station Sites June 15, 2000 Page 2 3. Adams Street and 47"' Avenue: ■ Rapid access to Highway 111 corridor and five (5) minute response to residential area north of Highway 111 except to the northeast corner of the city north of Fred Waring, • Adequate location for regional fire protection system, ■ Location is south of Whitewater Channel which could restrict or delay responses during flooding or other disasters; 4. Adams Street and 4e Avenue: ■ Responses to north La Quinta would not be within five (5) minutes to most areas, ■ Location is too far south and would not fit well with the regional fire protection plan, ■ Due io location, continued reliance on neighboring cities to cover initial responses in La Quinta, ■ Location is south of Whitewater Channel which could restrict or delay responses during flooding or other disasters. Please contact me if you need additional information. Fire Department representatives can be available at council meetings to respond to any questions and participate as needed. John McLaughlin West Desert Division Chief pc: S. Lake T. Hartung D. Cooley 407 11,16 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA May 8, 2001 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Robbins who asked Commissioner Butler to lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Jacques Abels, Richard Butler, Tom Kirk, Robert Tyler, and Chairman Steve Robbins. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez, Planning Manager Christine di lorio, Senior Engineer Steve Speer, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: A. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Tyler to reorganize the Agenda by taking Business Item "A" after Public Hearing Item "C". Unanimously approved. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Chairman Robbins asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of April 24, 2001. There being no corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Kirk to approve the minutes as submitted. Unanimously approved. B. It was moved and seconded by Commissioner Abels/Tyler to approve the Minutes of April 4, 2001 as submitted. Unanimously approved. C. Department Report: None. V. PRESENTATIONS: None. G:\WPD0CS\PC5-8-0j.wpd 1 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Continued - Environmental Assessment 94-287 Addendum, Specific Plan 94-025 Amendment #1 . Conditional Use Permit 99-047. and Parcel Map 28610; a request of Agiotage Limited for Certification of an EIR Addendum for Specific Plan 94-025 allowing: 1) a new access road for an approved master planned residential community of 277 houses; 2) development of a private road on a hillside slope exceeding 20 percent; 3) amend the Green Specific Plan to allow a 3,000 foot long private access road along the north side of a 330.70 acre property to serve ten custom lots; and 4) a Tentative Parcel Map subdividing 330.70 acres into four parcels and other lettered street lots, for the property bisected by the future Jefferson Street, approximately a half mile south of Avenue 58 1 . Chairman Robbins opened the public hearing and asked if the City Attorney's office would like to respond to the latest letter received from the Center for Biological Diversity. Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez responded to a letter received from the Center for Biological Diversity on May 7, 2001, raising a number of issues similar to the letter the Commission received at the last public hearing. The City Attorney's office has reviewed the letter and their comments remain the same as they were with respect to the last public hearing. He might point out that in Mr. Hogan's letter there is a discussion of the Gilroy case and Mr. Hogan's discussion of the facts in that case are correct. One of the challenges of a city attorney is responding to these types of letters when they are presented at the last moment. Again, their position is the same. There is no new information that was not fully studied in the prior EIR with respect to the impact on Big Horn Sheep. 2. Chairman Robbins asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if there were any changes in the staff report. Staff noted the Resolution dates were changed and staff was requesting two condition modifications. Condition #29 should be replaced by adding a sentence allowing the undeveloped natural open space to drain in its historical drainage course. Assistant City Attorney Ramirez asked that the words "Specific Plan" be added to Condition #1 following FEIR 94-287 Addendum. 3. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Robbins asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Jim Schlecht, attorney for Agiotage Limited, stated he was present to 409 acknowledge the efforts they have made over the years to try apd„y G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-01.wpd 2 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 reach an agreement with The Quarry. He wrote a letter to staff stating he had written to Mr. Morrow requesting him to respond in writing to a previous offer they had made to him. In his letter to staff he informed them that he had not heard from Mr. Morrow; however after he wrote that letter Mr. Morrow did call him. He repeated his request that they would like him to respond in writing with whatever he had to provide them with and Mr. Morrow declined. They have made very extensive efforts over a period of three or four years to reach an agreement and Mr. Morrow has declined at every step to try and work this out in some way that they believe is reasonable. As they were unable to reach an agreement, they pursued this alternative to see if they can do something with this property. 4. Mr. David Hogan, Center for Biological Diversity, stated his comments would be brief as most of their concerns were raised at the prior public hearing. He would, however, like to respond to some other points made by Assistant City Attorney Ramirez at the last meeting. The concerns raised in their first letter are not time barred in this situation under CEQA. The best example of this is that Fish and Game back in 1995 requested that the applicant and/or City provide a detailed mitigation plan of how the project impacts on the Big Horn were going to be mitigated up front as part of the subsequent EIR for public review and analysis. That was never complete and that is certainly relevant today because the same mitigation, that is a future unknown mitigation plan is still relied on here for mitigation for impacts from this particular action, the Addendum. The rationale of the CEQA court decision, as pointed out by the attorney, in the case of Chaparral Greens vs. City of Chula Vista, also does not apply to the Green project. In that court case it only addressed new information that was provided the Council prior to certification of the EIR, not after. In this case they have provided significant new information in evidence of changed circumstances since approval of the original 1995 EIR. In contrast here, there is significant new information and changed circumstances now available for Big Horn in relation to the Green project and those include, just to reiterate, significant decline of the Martinez Canyon ewe group since 1995; Federal listing as Endangered Species in 1998; Expert Recovery Team Essential Habitat identification in the year 2000; the formal Critical Habitat designation by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service in 2000; and the Big Horn Institute Urban Effects Study in 1999 or 2000. He also wanted to emphasize the Critical Habitat issue he did not 003 410 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-Ol.wpd 3 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 point out in his last letter, which was that Critical Habitat was in fact, designated over a portion of this site. He did not have the detailed maps to identify this at the time and have since got those and the portion of the project site to be impacted by this new access road to access the back lots and the back lots are all within designated Critical Habitat. Critical Habitat being those areas identified by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service to be essential for the conservation of the species and that is survival and recovery of the species as required by the Endangered Species Act. All this information clearly illustrates the need for a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR. The last thing was that he wanted to clarify a comment made at the last meeting where he quoted Mr. Jim DeForge of the Big Horn Institute over sheep number in the Martinez Canyon ewe group, and in response Commissioner pointed out that there had been a quote in the newspaper previously talking about how sheep numbers had been up in both ranges. He spoke with Jim DeForge specifically and he wanted to clarify that what he meant by that quote was that the sheep numbers had been up and that is only Iambs north of Highway 74 in both ranges meaning the northern Santa Rosa Mountains and San Jacinto Mountains. The sheep population numbers are down in the Santa Rosa Mountains south of Highway 74. It is an important distinction because the primary recovery unit of the species, how we will be able to judge whether or not the species is coming back from the brink of distinction, is whether or not ewe group population numbers are rising, not necessarily only populations of sheep in Anza Borrego State Park or Mexico. We need to know that all ewe groups are actually recovering and this is an important population in the southern Santa Rosa Mountains, Martinez Canyon ewe group. Thank you for your consideration. 5. Mr. Bill Morrow, representing the Quarry, stated that contrary to Mr. Schlecht's comments in his letter to the City, Mr. Morrow made a proposal in 1998, at which time they had meetings and turned down the proposal. Since that time he has met with Mr. Green, his wife and Mr. Anderholt, an attorney, on the site, in the last six weeks and made a proposal to them and has not had a response to that proposal. Since the last Commission meeting when it was suggested they get together, there has no request been made by Mr. Green or any of his people, to do so. They would be glad to do that if in fact they were asked to do, but were not. We have made a proposal and it has not been responded to. G:\WPDO CS\PC5-8-01.wpd 4 004 411 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 6. Commissioner Butler stated that the attorney for Mr. Green has given the Commission verification that he has corresponded with him and yet there is no written responses from Mr. Morrow. Mr. Morrow stated he did not accept the reimbursement agreement of 1998, and stated only verbally that he did not agree with it and there is no paper trail that states that. He has seen correspondence from the Green party trying to solve some of these problems and he does not see anything in writing stating that he disagrees with that. Why does it have to be verbal on his side and written on Mr. Greens' side if he so adamantly disagrees. Mr. Morrow stated he is not an attorney and therefore does not get involved in that. The meetings they had after these letters, which occurred in Palm Desert with Mr. Green and sometimes Mr. Schlecht, they were very vocal as to the fact that they thought their offers were terribly unreasonable and did not justify a written response. To say that they were not responded to is totally incorrect. He never thought it was necessary to respond in writing. They met for an hour or so and it was pretty apparent when they left that meeting that they were not agreeing with anything. He is waiting for their offer, a rebuttal or counteroffer from the offer he made personally to Mr. Green six weeks ago. Commissioner Butler noted that is not in writing. Mr. Morrow stated he understood that, but that is the fact. 7. Commissioner Kirk asked for clarification as to what has happened between the two parties. Mr. Morrow stated he had initiated the phone calls to Mr. Schlect and had not received a response. He called back and they did talk and told him at that time they were available to meet. He had made an offer and there was no response. 8. Mr. Craig Bryant, Winchester Development, stated that as a point of clarification, his company represented both parties to obtain specific plan approval and the development of The Quarry. During the process of the Green Specific Plan, the Planning Commission and City Council at that time, went out to the site and viewed the area with respect to the road alignment that was being considered at that time. Both entities agreed there would never be a road there because of the scaring of the earth and what it would take to put a road there. In lieu of that, they suggested both parties get together and solve the road in terms of a common entrance for both of them to use, that being through The Quarry. To him the 005 412 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-Ol.wpd 5 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 relevancy of this meeting may or may not be within the purview of this body, but one thing is very clear, there was a promise made by both the Planning Commission and City Council that there would never be a road that goes in that direction on that course. How the two parties get together and work this out relative to a common access seems to be something they have to decide between themselves. 9. Commissioner Abels stated he was on the Commission at that time and he does not remember any promise at that time. 10. Commissioner Kirk stated he remembers going to the site, but is not sure it is the same field trip. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated that field trip was in reference to the Hillside Ordinance and boulder fields. He did not remember any other field trip. 11. Commissioner Butler stated he was on a field trip and did go into The Quarry to look at those ten lots. Staff stated yes, in regard to the Hillside Ordinance. 12. Chairman Robbins stated the initial discussions were in 1994. 13. Commissioner Kirk stated that if this was the same field trip there was no promise made at that time in regard to a road. 14. Mr. Bryant stated the field trip he was referring to was several years ago and was thoroughly discussed at that time and should be referenced in the City Council minutes of that field trip. He would suggest the minutes be reviewed. 15. Mr. Schlecht, attorney for Mr. Green, stated he was involved with the project at that time and had many discussions with Mr. Bryant and there never was any discussions regarding the road. The issue of their having access through The Quarry came up when they discovered a public street was being abandoned. They made the issue before the City Council and perhaps the Planning Commission and the City then required The Quarry to supply them with an easement, which they did. They have an easement to go through The Quarry, but the problem is that the City, at that time, indicated that they would have to work out a reimbursement agreement with The Quarry to reimburse them for the cost of that road and that is where the issue is today. 41 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-01 .Wpd 6 006 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 16. Commissioner Kirk asked what the difference was between the two offers made between the two. Mr. Schlecht stated they offered Mr. Morrow $800,000 and Mr. Morrow wanted $2.7 million. Mr. Morrow was correct, he made it very clear on the phone that his client was not interested in an oral offer. First of all in a real estate offer it is ordinarily done in writing. He did not make it in writing and we told him we were not interested in his two lots and would he be interested in talking about more than two lots and Mr. Morrow stated absolutely not. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated it is not the Commission's responsibility to resolve the issue between the two parties, but to address the applications before them. 17. There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Robbins closed the public participation portion of the hearing. 18. Commissioner Butler stated he concurs with staff in regard to the issue between the two parties. However, based on what is before them, he would grant the applicant's request because without the road he is landlocked and he should have the right to access his property. He would, however, like a condition added that if they do resolve the issue, the road would not be developed. Assistant City Attorney Ramirez stated he would recommend against a condition that basically removes the approval pending an agreement being reached between the two parties. That would place the City in the position of being an arbitrator with respect to this agreement. Commissioner Butler stated his concern is that if they approve the road and then they reach a settlement, they could still build the road. Assistant City Attorney Ramirez stated he would review the condition and report back to the Commission. 19. Commissioner Tyler stated his concern is that the conditional use permit is written in such a way that the developer has a blank check. In order for him to support it he would need more details in regard to where and how the road would be constructed. 20. Commissioner Abels stated he concurs with both Commissioners Butler and Tyler. 21. Commissioner Kirk stated there have been applicants before the Commission before where all parties were not in agreement and the Commission would like to find a way to please everyone, but maybe the best circumstance in this instance is to not please 414 anyone. He believes Commissioners Butler and Tyler raised good 0� r G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-Ol.wpd 7 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 points. He would suggest that even though the City does not want to be a mediator, the City has put themselves in that position with the original approval. We made it clear that we wanted the access to go through The Quarry, so we inserted ourselves into this discussion and into this debate. It would be nice if they could create a framework for some sort of an agreement. However, it appears there are two different styles here. One where the applicant prefers to work with his attorney who structures typical real estate deals and then Mr. Morrow who likes to sit down and work directly with the owner and find a common agreement. He agrees with Commissioner Butler that he would like to condition this to cause the parties to come up with an agreement. If this is not possible, he is leaning toward not approving the applicant's request. The precedent it could establish in developing in our hillsides is real and could open up additional development opportunities. This road is not necessary for the development of the Green property; is necessary for the development of a very few lots on the Green property as compared to the entire project. In regard to Mr. Hogan's concerns he would side with him on some concerns, but does not feel it is necessary to open the EIR. However, the impacts are significant enough to reject the applicant's request. 22. Chairman Robbins stated this was brought to them because the applicants were unable to resolve the problem. He agrees that putting the Commission in the middle of a dispute between two developers is not good. This is a small portion of the project and should not make or break the project. In regard to the environmental issues, he wants to make it clear that he finds the tactics of the Center for Biological Diversity deplorable to him. They are trying to blackmail an entire project over a relatively small change and if they truly feel that there is new evidence or changed conditions, then they should file a lawsuit and challenge the entire EIR. If there are going to be impacts to the sheep, the impacts are there whether or not the road is part of the project. Tying their reasons to the road is just a basic no growth issue. If this was the only issue he would be voting for the amendment to the EIR. 23. Commissioner Butler stated he would not want to have the road approved just for purpose of developing the ten lots, but the project was originally approved with the ten lots and the assumption that those ten lots would be accessible. Now we have another issue being raised in that if they do not approve the ten 415 lots, or access to them, are they opening themselves up to another 8 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-Ol.wpd 8 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 problem by denying this project the value of those properties? If they deny the road and they land lock the developer are they denying something they have already approved. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the original Conditions of Approval allows them to develop the ten lots with access through The Quarry which does not land lock these lots, if they can work out a deal. They have an easement and it is an issue of how much they want to pay. If this is not approved the original approvals and conditions still govern this project. 24. Commissioner Kirk asked if this would be a "taking" if denied. Assistant City Attorney Ramirez stated no. The parcels have access. They have legal rights. They have an easement. The prior condition was worded in such a way that it was an agreement to agree. On an inverse condemnation claim, we do not have a denial of use, nor do we have any sort of land lock situation. What is being discussed here is the valuation of this cost sharing. Although he has not had the opportunity to analyze the issue, his view is that there is no inverse liability for purposes of land lock issue. 25. Commissioner Kirk asked if the Assistant City Attorney had any concerns regarding Commissioner Butler's suggestion. Assistant City Attorney Ramirez stated he did, but unfortunately he would not be able to articulate on them in light of not being able to look at the original condition. His view is that there is an opportunity prior to the City Council hearing for staff to look at it as to whether or not we have a denial and appeal by the applicant or that condition is imposed and it goes to the City Council. 26. Commissioner Butler stated that based on what he has heard from staff, he would not even propose the condition. 27. Chairman Robbins asked if the Commission determined to not allow the road, would they then not approve the Amendment to the EIR, Conditional Use Permit, or Specific Plan. If the Parcel Map was a lettered lot they would have to deny all the applications. Staff stated the Parcel Map could be conditioned to remove the lettered lots which would remove the road. Discussion followed regarding the Parcel Map. 28. Commissioner Kirk stated he assumed the major motivation for the Parcel Map was to sell off the lots. 416 009 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-01 .wpd 9 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 29. Chairman Robbins stated the Parcel Map is motivated to sell lots off for development. 30. Commissioner Kirk stated that the circulation pattern had been changed to accommodate the road and he was not sure that was the best circulation pattern if the road was not approved. He asked if there was a parcel map presently on the project. Staff stated this Parcel Map defines the toe of slope to divide the hillside area from the developable land and also includes the road. 31. Chairman Robbins stated it appears there is some benefit in approving the parcel map. 32. Commissioner Kirk asked if the Addendum was denied, could they approve the parcel map. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated yes, if the road was removed the parcel map would comply with the original Specific Plan approvals. 33. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-058 denying certification of an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report 94-287. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Chairman Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 34. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-059, denying Conditional Use Permit 99-047. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Chairman Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 35. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-060, denying approval of Specific Plan 94-025, Amendment #1. a. Remove any conditions that pertain to the access road. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Robbins. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 417 ABSTAIN: None. 010 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-01.wpd 10 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 36. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-061, recommending approval of Parcel Map 28610, as amended. a. Lot "B" road shall be deleted. b. Condition #29: Stormwater falling on land developed for beneficial use, including common areas and roadways, during the peak 24-hour period of a 100 year storm shall be retained on site. The tributary area for which the developer is responsible shall extend to the centerline of the adjacent public streets. Storm water falling on undeveloped land dedicated as natural open space shall continue to drain into its historical drainage course. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Robbins. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. B. Conditional Use Permit 2001-059; a request of Sprint PCS Imperial Irrigation District for the installation of telecommunication apparatus to be located on an existing 100 foot high tower at 81-600 Avenue 58. 1 . Chairman Robbins opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Robbins asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if the tower was already 100 feet in height. Staff stated yes and it was setback on the site. 3. There being no further questions nor any other public comment, Chairman Robbins closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened the issue for Commission discussion. 4. Commissioner Butler asked if the Imperial Irrigation District (IID) tower was available to be shared and if IID agreed. Staff clarified that IID was aware, signed the application, and approved of the use of the tower. 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-062 approving Conditional Use Permit 2001-059, as recommended. - 011 418 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-01 .wpd 11 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Robbins. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. C. Site Development Permit 2001-701 - Eagles Bend; a request of CRV La Quinta 70, LLC, Peter Bilicki for review of architectural plans for two new prototype residential units with three facades each to be located at the northwest corner of Bellerive and Winged Foot within PGA West. 1. Chairman Robbins opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Robbins asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if the reference to a five foot sideyard setback was specified in the PGA West Specific Plan. Staff stated it was correct per the Specific Plan and the Zoning Code. Commissioner Tyler questioned Condition #2, as it appeared to be missing something. Should it not say it would expire unless the work is started before the expiration date. Staff stated they would reword the condition to be more clear. Commissioner Tyler questioned Condition #4 where staff has conditioned the project for less than what the applicant is proposing. If they are willing to provide more than required, it should be recognized. Staff would modify the condition to reflect the applicant's request. 3. Chairman Robbins asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Peter Bilicki, the applicant, stated this would be in -fill project that would finish out this community. 4. Commissioner Kirk questioned the purpose of the recess for the garage door on Plan 2B & 2C. Mr. Bilicki stated it was to break up and relieve the facade instead of having a traditional flat wall. It creates a shadowing effect and undulates back and forth. 5. There being no further public comment, Chairman Robbins closed the public participation portion of the hearing and asked if there was any Commission discussion. 6. There being no discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioner Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-063 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 41 2001-701, as submitted. 01 K. G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-Ol.wpd 12 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 a. Condition #4A. and B deleted. b. Condition #2 add language regarding expiration. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Robbins. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. VII. BUSINESS ITEM: A. Site Development Permit 2001-704 - The Estates; a request of Estates 18 LLC, Peter Bilicki for review of an 18 lot development of two prototypes with three and two facade treatments, respectively, and landscape design plans for property located along Peninsula Lane within PGA West. 1. Chairman Robbins asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. There being no questions of staff, or the applicant, and no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Minute Motion 2001-010 approving Site Development Permit 2001-704 as recommended. Unanimously approved. PUBLIC HEARINGS CONTINUED: D. Tentative Tract Map 30136; a request of SRHI, LLC (Reilly Homes) for a for review of a subdivision of 18.94 acres into 62 single family and other miscellaneous lots located on the east side of Madison Street, abutting both sides of Legends Way and west of Mountain View within PGA West. 1. Chairman Robbins opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. There were any questions of staff, Chairman Robbins asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Scott McCann, representing the developer, stated they accepted the conditions as proposed and was available for any questions. r 4210 V i t7 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-01 .wpd 13 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 3. There being no questions of the applicant, nor any other public comment, Chairman Robbins closed the public participation portion of the hearing and asked if there was any Commission discussion. 4. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioner Abels/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-064 recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 30136, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Robbins. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. E. Site Development Permit 2001-693; a request of JR Properties for The 990 Stores, for review of architectural and landscaping plans for a shopping center to include a 23,00 square foot commercial store located at northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Highway 1 1 1. 1 . Chairman Robbins opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa stated the applicant had requested a continuance to May 22, 2001. 2. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Kirk to continue Site Development Permit 2001-696, to May 22, 2001. Unanimously approved. F. Addendum to Environmental Assessment #41. General Plan Amendment 2001-078. Zone Change 2001-101, Specific Plan 121-E Amendment #5. Site Development Permit 2001-703 and Tentative Tract Map 30125; a request of KSL Land Development for, 1) certification of an Addendum to an Environmental Impact Report; 2) a General Plan Amendment and Zoning Change to change lands currently designated as Tourist Commercial to Low Density Residential; 3) a Specific Plan Amendment establishing development standards and design guidelines for the construction of 65 single family homes, a clubhouse, and amendment of the landscaping plant palette; and 4) development plans for the model homes and subdivision of 17.82 acres into 65 single family and miscellaneous lots to be located on the southeast corner of Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50. 1. Chairman Robbins opened the public hearing and asked if there was any public comment. 4'' 1 014 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-01 .wpd 14 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 2. Mr. David Erwin, representing the La Quinta Country Club, stated he has read the staff report and it appears that most of his concerns are addressed. Their concerns are that the minimum standards for lot size are met. He sees no reason to reduce the lot size. He also requests that they ensure that all traffic concerns are addressed and the walls along Avenue 50 be compatible with the adjacent wall that it is in effect extending. He spoke with Mr. Hobbs, the developer of the houses, and it is his understanding that the size of the houses will be a minimum of 2,500 square feet, which is relatively compatible with the existing homes and he would like to have this included in the conditions. 3. Commissioner Butler asked for clarification on a question raised by the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee in regard to the wall. Staff stated they were referencing a power wall used for interior courtyards. 4. Commissioner Tyler questioned the ten foot wall between the homes. 5. Planning Manager Christine di lorio informed the Commission that a request had been received to continue this item to May 22, 2001, and these questions could be addressed at that time. 6. There being no discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Tyler to continue the applications to May 22, 2001, as requested by the applicant. G. Environmental Assessment 2001-421 General Plan Amendment 2000- 073 Specific Plan 84 004 Amendment #4 Tentative Parcel Map 20469 Amendment and Tentative Tract Map Amendments to 25154 27835 27840 27252 28343 28540 28912 29043 29283 and 29457;a request of Watson and Watson Engineering and Forrest Haag, ASLA, Incorporated for 1) Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact; 2) General Plan Amendment to modify Chapter 7, Policy 7-1.4.3 of the Infrastructure and Public Services Element to allow an exemption to the undergrouding of utility lines that are attached to joint -use 92 KV transmission lines; 3) Amendment #4 to Specific Plan 84-004 to establish new guidelines and standards for overhead utility lines, undergounding, and adding five acres to the 718 acre master planned community of 1,300 residential units oriented around two 18- hole golf courses; 4) a request to amend the Conditions of Approval for Parcel Maps and Tract Maps to eliminate the undergrounding of overhead 422 015 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-01 .wpd 15 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 utility lines on 92 KV transmission lines and; and 5) amending Tract 29457 to subdivide 283 acres into 265 residential and other common lots to be located south of Avenue 48, north of Avenue 50, west of Jefferson Street, and east of Washington Street within Rancho La Quinta Country Club. 1. Chairman Robbins opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. 2. Commissioner Tyler asked if this request had been approved by Council and this was "clean up" work. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the City Council had approved a request by Lundin to not underground their utilities at the corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. At that time Council stated others could apply for the same relief and this developer is doing SO. This allows staff to clean up the General Plan and development regulations to allow this to happen. Commissioner Tyler asked if the First School of the Desert received the same approval. Staff stated that was correct. A precedent was set but these tracts have not been approved. 3. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 4. Chairman Robbins asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler questioned the different numbers used for kilovolts and where did they come from. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated Edison uses 66 KV and Imperial Irrigation District (IID) uses 92 KV. In staff's discussions with IID several years ago, they indicated they had capabilities of undergrounding anything below 34.5 KV, so staff used that number. Although they have nothing approaching that range, staff still used that number in case things changed. Commissioner Tyler stated that if the General Plan is to be changed, the 34.5 KV number should be used for consistency. 5. Commissioner Butler asked how the cost for undergrounding was determined. Staff stated ventilation would be required and IID did not have the equipment to maintain that type facility as it is extremely expensive. Commissioner Butler stated the cost would be passed onto the developer of each project until it was all 423 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-Ol.wpd 16 016 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 completed, so that from a practical standpoint, he does not see it ever happening anyway. Staff stated this is what they understood for a long time until they learned it could be done but it is very expensive and in addition to the developer paying those costs, IID would then need to upgrade their equipment to maintain it. 6. Commissioner Abels asked staff to explain the uses on the poles. Staff explained that these are joint use poles that have cable TV, telephone lines, 22.5 KV and the top line is 92 KV. What this condition allows is that since all the poles could not come down, staff is agreeing to leave everything on the pole. 7. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Robbins asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Forrest Haag, representing the applicant, stated he had questions on the conditions for the Specific Plan. Condition #53 is asking for a five foot lawn setback and should be 18 inches and Condition #68 in regard to the Fringe -Toed Lizard fee. As this property is within the Fringe -Toed Lizard Habitat Mitigation area it is already required to pay its fee. Planning Manager Christine di lorio stated that due to the State Fish and Game Department not agreeing to the Agreement, the applicant is now required to do a 1603 Permit which calls for the biological study in addition to paying the fee. Discussion followed regarding the fee and study. 8. Commissioner Tyler asked what was proposed on the new five acre acquisition where it shows a 30-foot strip of land running down to Avenue 50. Mr. Haag stated it was an access easement that he understood was being abandoned and was being negotiated and may go away. 9. Commissioner Kirk stated the Fish and Game issue is a concern to him and asked if the City has to enforce the condition. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the applicant is the one responsible and ultimately would be paying the fine. Staff could remove the condition and it would be up to the applicant to comply with Fish and Game requirements. 10. There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Robbins closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened the issue for discussion. 11. Commissioner Tyler stated the requirement to underground all the 424 perimeter wires has been a condition since 1984, and obviously the developer has bonded for it and passed that cost on -to th* 17 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-Ol.wpd 17 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 home buyers and now it becomes a profit windfall to the developer. If the Council wants it done later an assessment would be placed on the home buyer a second time. It seems intuitively wrong to grant this condition without some mitigation on the part of the developer. As far as the technology available, you just have to go to the City of Indian Wells and you do not see any power lines anywhere. It can be done even if it is costly. Discussion followed as to the history of undergrouding of lines. 12. Chairman Robbins noted some errors in the conditions and he wasn't sure whether they were relevant or not. Throughout most of the conditions there are requirements that are contrary to where the City has been trying to go in regard to the use of turf grass. Community Development Director Jerry Herman pointed out that all the tracts have been developed except for the new five acre tract before them. Chairman Robbins went over the conditions that needed to be corrected or changed. He pointed out that this project has the ability to use canal water for irrigation purposes but has chosen over the years to use very minimal amount of canal water. This may be an opportunity to require them to use additional canal water in lieu of ground water since this is back before the Commission for review. 13. Commissioner Tyler stated it was his understanding that the Commission was only to address the conditions on the new five acre site and the power lines. 14. Chairman Robbins stated that if it comes back to the Commission, they can reopen any part of the tract. Assistant City Attorney Ramirez stated he did not have all the background on these tracts, but as these tracts have been built they are vested and therefore, not all the conditions can be opened up. 15. Commissioner Kirk asked that if they are opening up the conditions, can't the Commission require changes in any area such as the landscaping. Assistant City Attorney Ramirez stated they could deal with specific conditions item by item. He asked what condition specifically would deal with the canal water. 16. Chairman Robbins stated the condition should be the same as what is being required of new golf courses which is that the primary source of irrigation water for the golf courses shall be canal water. The project has the ability to take canal water and 4 215 018 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-Ol.wpd 18 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 has chosen not to do this. Community Development Director Jerry Herman clarified that the golf courses are built. Chairman Robbins stated they have the ability to use canal water right now without requiring any construction. This would only require a change in the way they operate the golf course. 17. Mr. Lloyd Watson, engineer for project, stated they do take canal water into the project for irrigating the golf course and they are in the process of upgrading that delivery. CVWD is installing a new water line in to Jefferson Street which will allow them to use even more. 18. Chairman Robbins asked if the applicant was willing to have a condition imposed that the primary source of irrigation water for the golf course shall be canal water. This would be at least 51 % of the water use for irrigating the golf course would be water from the canal system and not the ground water. Mr. Watson stated they are currently taking whatever water CVWD can deliver to them. 19. Commissioner Kirk suggested the condition read 51 % or the maximum amount CVWD can deliver. 20. Mr. Grady Sparks, representing Rancho La Quinta, stated he would like to explore this option, but it is his understanding that they were themselves moving toward this. Years back they were asked to mix their water usage which they have been doing. There are one or two months out of the year that you need to mix the water. It is more economical to use the canal water, but not having all the details or his agreement with CVWD before him at this meeting, he would like to take this under advisement to review the economics of this requirement. There has been problems with water delivery due to the street widening project on Jefferson Street. It is not that CVWD does not have it, it is just that during the construction and CVWD making their changes during the Jefferson Street construction. They have canal water as a primary source to their irrigation lakes on both golf courses. He would have no problem doing this on a voluntary basis, but would like to have time to address this. If there is a problem, they could raise it at the City Council. rj Q4�c G.\WPD0CS\PC5-8-01 .wpd 19 _, v 1 v Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 21. Commissioner Kirk asked if a blanket condition could be used that wherever applicable to all the tracts, a condition would be added requiring the primary source of water be canal water. Staff suggested this be added to the Specific Plan which would address the entire site. 22. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-071 recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-421, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Chairman Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 23. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-072, recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 2000-073, as amended. a. General Plan Policy 7-1.4.3 amended as follows: The City shall require the undergrounding of all existing and proposed overhead electric lines, less than 34.5 kilovolts, to enhance the visual quality of the City. All existing utility lines attached and parallel to joint -use 92 Kv transmission power poles are exempt from undergrounding requirement. Should undergrounding costs become economically feasible in the future for high voltage transmission lines, the City, in conjunction with other public and private property owners, shall explore ways to remove the overhead lines from Image Corridors through such methods as an assessment district, etc. Until removal can take place vertical landscaping shall be installed outside the utility easement corridor to screen the power poles and guyed wires pursuant to the policies prescribed in Chapter 2 (Circulation Element) of the General Plan. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Butler, Kirk, and Chairman Robbins. NOES: Commissioner Tyler. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 24. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-073, recommending 427 approval of Specific Plan 84-004, Amendment #4, as amended - 020 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-01 .wpd 20 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 b. Add Condition relative to 51 % of the primary water source, or whatever CVWD can deliver, shall be canal water for the golf course. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Robbins. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 25. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-074, recommending approval of an Amendment to Tract Map 29457, as recommended. a. Condition #13: The applicant shall vacate abutter's rights of access to Avenue 48 and Jefferson Street entryway aligned with Avenue 49. Vacation of abutter's rights do not apply to CVWD for well sites. b. Condition #32: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the maximum pad elevation for the following lots shall be: Lot 259 45.6 feet Lot 260 46.4 feet Lot 261 47.1 feet Lot 262 48.0 feet Lot 263 48.7 feet Lot 264 49.2 feet Lot 265 49.8 feet ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Robbins. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 26. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-075, recommending approval of an Amendment to Tract Map 27952 and Tract 27952 Amendment #1, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Chairman Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 02]. 498 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-01.wpd 21 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 27. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-076, recommending approval of an Amendment to Parcel Map 20469 as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Chairman Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 28. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-077, recommending approval of an Amendment to Tract Map 27840, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Chairman Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 29. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-078, recommending approval of an Amendment to Tract Map 28343, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Chairman Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 30. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-079, recommending approval of an Amendment to Tract Map 28640, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Chairman Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 31. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-080, recommending approval of an Amendment to Tract Map 28912, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Chairman Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 022 423 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-01.wpd 22 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 32. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-081, recommending approval of an Amendment to Tract Map 27835, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Chairman Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 33. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-082, recommending approval of an Amendment to Tract Map 29306, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Chairman Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 34. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-083, recommending approval of an Amendment to Tract Map 25154, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Chairman Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 35. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-084, recommending approval of an Amendment to Tract Map 29283, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Chairman Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and NOES: None. ABSENT: None. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. VIII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. Commissioner Tyler gave a report of the City Council meeting of May 1 2001. 023 430 G:\WPDOCS\PC 5-8-01 . wpd 23 Planning Commission Minutes May 8, 2001 IX. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Butler to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held May 22, 2001, at 7:00 p.m. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 9:05 p.m. on May 8, 2001. Respectfully submitted, tt awyer, xE" ecutive Secretary City a Quinta, California 4 3 t 024 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-8-01.wpd 24 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA May 22, 2001 CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Robbins who asked Commissioner Tyler to lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Jacques Abels, Richard Butler, Tom Kirk, Robert Tyler, and Chairman Steve Robbins. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez, Planning Manager Christine di lorio, Senior Engineer Steve Speer, Planning Consultant Nicole Criste, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: A. Chairman Robbins stated a request had been received from Country Club of the Desert to reorganize the agenda taking Business Item "A" first. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Butler to take Business Item "A" first on the agenda. Unanimously approved. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Chairman Robbins asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of May 8, 2001. Commissioner Tyler asked that Page 7, Item 20 be corrected to delete "Abels"; Page 11, Item #36 be corrected to state, "as amended"; and Page 16, Item 2 be corrected by changing "Hastings Day Care" with "First School of the Desert".There being no further corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Abets to approve the minutes as corrected. Unanimously approved. B. Department Report: None. V. PRESENTATIONS: None. 432 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-22-01 .wpd 1 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 VI. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Tract Map 29894; a request of Country Club of the Desert for a deviation from the Public Works Department approved mass grading plan for the property located on the north side of Avenue 54 between Jefferson Street and Madison Street. Chairman Robbins asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Robbins asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to clarify Attachment 1 as to whether or not it had been approved by Council. Staff stated the design details for the perimeter landscaping were conceptual when approved and the height of the berm was not defined until the mass grading plan was submitted. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to clarify what the Code required in regard to the wall, sidewalk, and height. Staff did so. 3. Chairman Robbins asked if there was a wall proposed. Staff stated it is proposed to be set back a distance ranging 15 to 25 feet along Avenue 54. Chairman Robbins questioned the 3:1 slope behind the wall. 4. Commissioner Butler asked how this occurred without staff knowing it. Staff stated that since they have not completed the grading there was no need to inspect it. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated that for any project other than a golf course, the pad elevations would be defined and they would have to grade to that plan. During the course of grading for a golf course, the City's inspectors do not check detailed elevations and the developer grades at their own risk. At the completion of the grading they are required to submit a certificate to the City certifying that the grading was completed to the approved plans. In this instance, there is no doubt they have deviated from the approved plan. 5. Commissioner Kirk reviewed the approval process and asked why it was now before the Commission. Staff clarified that when the wall plans were submitted for approval, the grading issue was brought to staff's attention. Commissioner Kirk asked if staff had a recommendation. Staff stated they did not. 433 002 G:\WPDO CS\PC5-22-01.wpd 2 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 6. Chairman Robbins stated it appears the golf course is 20+ feet below the street so the golf course is in a 40 foot hole below the top of the berm. 7. Commissioner Butler asked if there were any City codes that would allow this type of berm to be approved. Staff stated there are some issues in regard to this because in some instances a noise issue may require a higher berms than normal, such as in the case of Rancho La Quinta and Lake La Quinta. Commissioner Butler stated he did not entirely object to the berm. 8. Commissioner Abels asked what the height of the berm would be at its highest point with the wall on top. Staff stated the wall will not be on the top of the berm. It will be near the bottom and six feet in height. 9. Commissioner Tyler asked if there was a site plan for the interior of the project. Staff stated the applicant would address this. 10. Chairman Robbins asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Ms. Nancy Aaronson, representing Country Club of the Desert, stated they are trying to find a location for excess dirt on the site. They are trying to balance the dirt out over the entire project. Aesthetically from inside the project the berming is essential to protect the value of the project. They had two different grading plans approved for their project. One was the right of way and the other was for the golf course. Steve Garcia, landscape architect for the project, showed photographs that had been taken of the site. The dirt is stockpiled and will be sculptured at a later date. Within the right of way they have maintained the 3:1 slope with a meandering sidewalk. The wall is set back to be no closer than 15 feet from the right of way. Discussion followed as to the landscaping materials that would be used and the grading elevations on both sides of the berm. 11. Chairman Robbins asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Kirk asked if the Specific Plan required the landscaping to match the other side of Avenue 54. Staff stated yes. Mr. Garcia stated their plans calls for a maximum 30% turf in the perimeter right of way area. 12. Commissioner Butler asked what type of vegetation would be used on the berm. Mr. Garcia stated desert perennials and drought tolerant shrubs. 434 003 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-22-01 .wpd 3 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 13. Commissioner Tyler stated there would be a fantastic view to the south, but the height of the berm would mask the view of the mountains. Mr. Garcia stated the reason for the height was to hide the view of roof tops at PGA West. 14. Commissioner Kirk asked at what point they were viewing the south view. Mr. Garcia stated at the end of the residential cul-de- sacs. 15. There being no further discussion, it was before the Commission for discussion. 16. Commissioner Kirk stated he believes the applicant has made a point in that if houses were built there it would be a hardscape and this softscape is a relief. His concern is that they do not know how the berm will be sculptured. If there is to be no more dirt to be added he would have no objection. 17. Commissioner Abels stated it was a nice presentation and he would have no objections. 18. Commissioner Butler stated he likes the concept of buffering the golf course from the street. He supports the project. 19. Commissioner Tyler stated that driving by presently it is like driving through the Grand Canyon. There has been a lot of concern voiced by the residents of PGA West. He had strong objections and after the presentation his opinion is somewhat tempered. 20. Chairman Robbins stated he too was concerned after driving by, but after hearing the presentation and the intent of the applicant, he does like the concept. 21. Commissioner Tyler asked if this concept would be carried all the way down Avenue 54. Ms. Aaronson stated yes. 22. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Butler to adopt Minute Motion 2001-011 approving the deviation to the approved mass grading plan for Tract Map 29894. Unanimously approved. 004 435 G:\WPDOCS\PC 5-22-01 . wpd 4 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Site Development Permit 2001-693; a request of JR Properties for The 990 Stores, for review of architectural and landscaping plans for a shopping center to include a 23,00 square foot commercial store located at northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Highway 1 1 1 . 1. Chairman Robbins opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Christine di lorio and Planning Consultant Nicole Criste presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Robbins asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if staff could explain the drive access shared with Home Depot. Staff did so. Commissioner Tyler asked how many phases there were to the project. Staff stated this area is stated in the Specific Plan as Phase II. 3. Commissioner Butler asked about the landscaping on the north side of the property and the bikepath. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated the General Plan has the bikepath on the north side of the Channel. The problem is how to get the bikepath across Dune Palms Road and Adams Streets. Commissioner Butler stated that on the north end of the building the landscaping is very sparse. Staff clarified there would be 36-inch box trees along the entire length of the project. 4. Commissioner Tyler asked if the design of the wall with openings as stated in the ALRC minutes, would be constructed. Staff stated that is something that could be considered as it was required of the Corporate Center. 5. Commissioner Butler stated his concern has always been the maintenance of the landscaping of the rear elevation. He would prefer to have 36 inch trees in the parking lot and the smaller trees in the rear. 6. Commissioner Kirk asked if the entire parking lot would be built at the time the 99 Cent Store is constructed. Staff stated yes. Commissioner Kirk asked where and how large the monument sign would be. Staff stated it is consistent with the Specific Plan requirements and would be located in front of the Jack in the Box 436 005 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-22-01.wpd 5 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 and is not included in their 50 foot size limitation. Each retail tenant would be allowed 50 square feet or a percent of the store frontage. Discussion followed regarding the Code requirements and Specific Plan requirements. 7. Chairman Robbins stated his only concern was with the rear elevation as it appears to be a square box. The wall behind the Home Depot appears to be higher than six feet and the view is nothing but concrete and building. There needs to be more landscaping to soften the look. Staff stated the Specific Plan requires a six foot wall. 8. Commissioner Butler asked about the color of the awning. Staff stated the colors have been conditioned to be blue and grey. Commissioner Butler asked if the height was stipulated in the conditions. Staff stated yes. 9. Chairman Robbins asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Bob Bucci, architect representing the applicant, stated they agree with the arcades for the entire length of the 99 Cent Store. They would like to request bringing the rest of the buildings back to the Commission at a later date. Staff stated there was a requirement that it be brought back to ensure it meets all the requirements. 10. Commissioner Kirk stated it was his understanding that this approval would be the final approval. Staff stated Condition #37 requires it come back to the Planning Commission. 11. Mr. Bucci stated another issue is the requirement to match the Home Depot's arch. Home Depot has a simple band around the building and their design was to add some interest to the building. In regard to signage, the would like to request a seven foot height and seven foot width or eight foot height and six foot width which is still within the allowable square footage for signs. 12. Commissioner Tyler asked what the sign height was on the drawings. Mr. Bucci stated it was 13 feet by 9 feet. They concur with all the other conditions. 13. Chairman Robbins asked if the applicant could address the rear elevation. Mr. Bucci stated staff recommended they mirror the Home Depot rear elevation, hiding the mechanical equipment and 437 adding the split face block wall. 006 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-22-Ol.wpd 6 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 14. Chairman Robbins stated the color change will not be seen due to the block wall as well as the tree. Mr. Bucci stated the rear elevation could be varied to break it up. Planning Manager Christine di lorio stated that lowering the rear elevation will allow you to see the back of the front parapets as well as the mechanical equipment from the rear. 15. Commissioner Butler asked if the mechanical equipment was below the roof line. Staff stated yes and the rear parapet height is 26 feet and the front parapet is 34 feet. Mr. Bucci stated they could raise the parapet up on the back of the 99 Center Store and lower it in other areas. 16. There being no further public comment, the public participation portion of the hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 17. Commissioner Abels stated he had no objections. 18. Commissioner Butler stated his concern is the north elevation and landscaping. Staff stated it is still conditioned to come back to the Commission before final approval for building permits. 19. Commissioner Tyler stated he is concerned about the arcade that it not be blocked with vendors. He would like to see the arcade developed and agrees with staff that the awnings be lowered. In regard to the sign, if they propose a sign that is within what is allowed he has no objection. 20. Commissioner Kirk stated he agrees with the changes to the design. His concern is that staff has asked them to mirror the Home Depot store and the Commission is not happy with the Home Depot design. In regard to the project coming back again for Commission approval, he would recommend that the site plan and elevations for the 99 Cent Store come back to the Commission, along with the remainder of the center. 21. Chairman Robbins stated he does not like the design of the Home Depot arches and what the applicant has submitted is a much better design. He would not like to piece -meal the project by considering the entire site in sections. 22. Commissioner Kirk asked if a project had ever been submitted in 438 different phases. Staff stated the Albertsons Center was approved under the Site Development Permit with the in -line stores. 007 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-22-Ol.wpd 7 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 Commissioner Kirk stated that the way it is proposed he would not support it. Without seeing the changes they are suggesting for the rear elevation and how the arcade would be designed he would not approve it. 23. Commissioner Tyler stated he concurred. They ought to be able to focus on the 99 Center Store and see the rest of the site later. Staff suggested that Condition #37 be amended to read that the elevations for Buildings "A", "B", "C", and "D" be brought back to the Commission. 24. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-079, approving Site Development Permit 2001- 693, as amended. a. Condition #35,A.: Add - 99 Cent Store excluded. The roof of the arcade shall be equivalent in height to that shown for the 99 Cent Store and shall be covered. b. Condition #35.B.: Deleted C. Condition #35.C.: Expand either Buildings "C" or the 99 Cent Store to incorporate the triangular area between the two buildings into either of the floor plans. d. Condition #35.D.: Step the parapet along the entire rear elevation of all buildings. e. Condition #37: Amended elevations, landscaping, and site plan for Buildings "A", "B", "C" and "D" shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. f. Condition #40: Signs shall not exceed 50 square feet (7 feet in height and 7 feet in length). ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Butler, Tyler, and Chairman Robbins. NOES: Commissioner Kirk. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. B. Addendum to Environmental Assessment #41 General Plan Amendment 2001-078 Zone Change 2001-101, Specific Plan 1211 Amendment #5. Site Development Permit 2001-703 and Tentative Tract Mao 30125; a request of KSL Land Development for, 1) certification of an Addendum to an Environmental Impact Report; 2) a General Plan Amendment and Zoning Change to change lands currently designated as Tourist Commercial to Low Density Residential; 3) a Specific Plan Amendment 439 establishing development standards and design guidelines for the 008 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-22-01.wpd 8 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 construction of 65 single family homes, a clubhouse, and amendment of the landscaping plant palette; and 4) development plans for the model homes and subdivision of 17.82 acres into 65 single family and miscellaneous lots to be located on the southeast corner of Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50. 1. Chairman Robbins opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Christine di lorio and Planning Consultant Nicole Criste presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff requested a condition be added that parking for a three car garage be provided if a plan for a fourth bedroom is added. Condition #19 should be deleted. 2. Chairman Robbins asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to clarify the house minimum square footage. Staff stated the Specific Plan states 1,200 square feet excluding the garage, but the prototypes state 2,131 square feet excluding the garage. 3. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to explain Condition #4. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated it is an explanation of how they widen the street at the bridge. Commissioner Tyler asked why there were no conditions on the turning access width. Staff stated it could be added to give them full turn access at the emergency access. The interior stacking is adequate and the outside pocket is yet to be designed. 4. Chairman Robbins asked if there were any existing homes of this size in this area. Staff stated no. 5. Commissioner Tyler stated he would like to see the tandem parking in the garage allowed. Staff stated the development standards could be modified to allow the tandem garage parking. 6. Chairman Robbins asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Forrest Haag, representing the applicant, stated they have prepared some elevations to address issues raised by staff. He understands the off -site improvements, but not the requirement to build and pay for the retaining wall. Specific conditions they question are the retaining wall easement in Condition #4. They asked that Condition. #22 be amended to not tie the parking lot to the development of the houses being constructed on Avenue 50. He suggested that before this parking 4 `? ( 009 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-22-01.wpd 9 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 lot be eliminated the permanent parking lot be built. He asked that a condition be added to allow a development regulation to allow the pool to be built to the zero lot line for Planning Area 3. Condition #10 of the Specific Plan and Condition #2 of the Site Development Permit would need to be changed. 7. Chairman Robbins asked there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Butler asked Mr. Haag to explain why they should have relief from building the retaining wall. Mr. Haag stated that as Eisenhower Drive widening over the bridge is constructed to four lanes it will encroach into their existing golf hole requiring a retaining wall of 16 feet to four feet to be constructed. Staff clarified that in Tract Map Condition #47.A. it explains it better. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated the City is consistent with their practice to have developments widen Arterial streets adjacent to their property. Although the golf hole is not part of this tract, the previous parcel map for the parking lot required them to widen Eisenhower Drive along the golf hole frontage. The issue of widening is part of their issue and the retaining wall is a second issue. The General Plan as currently written requires the four lanes. The updated General Plan might not. The bridge widening is included in the Capital Improvement Projects for 2003. This requirement is not new, but has been on the site since its creation. 8. Chairman Robbins asked if there was any public comment. Mr. Gene Reed, representing the L Quinta Country Club, stated their issue is with Condition #17 which states the minimum square footage intended to be built. In regard to the wall, they would request it match what is currently there for Duna La Quinta. Regarding the parking lot, they agree with staff's recommendation. On the pool at the corner of Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50, is there any requirement to hide the pool with landscaping. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste stated there is a six foot high perimeter wall with landscaping. Mr. Reed asked that the traffic pattern on Avenue 50 take into consideration their entrance as well. 9. There being no further public comment, Chairman Robbins closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened it to Commission discussion. 010 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-22-01.wpd 10 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 10. Commissioner Kirk stated they have reviewed other amendments where the procedure was not correct for the site. In this case it is the right use for the site. With respect to the concerns raised, he concurs with staff's recommendation; on the timing, he agrees with the applicant; the zero lot line for pools, he has no objection; the meandering wall averaging 20 feet is acceptable; lot sizes at 6000 square feet instead of 6500 feet still needs to be addressed; building square footage minimums he does not feel strongly about. 1 1 . Commissioner Butler stated he is concerned about the parking lot and agrees with the applicant as long as it is conditioned. He agrees with the requirement for the retaining wall. 12. Commissioner Tyler stated that in Planning Area II, it talks about minimum lot size for this project and should include the data for this project. He would like to know exactly how many lots are less than 6500 square feet. Staff stated there were five. Commissioner Tyler stated that based on the information provided by the applicant, he has no objection. 13. Chairman Robbins asked if the Compatibility Ordinance would come into play with this project. Staff stated that if another developer builds a part of the project, then it will. 14. Commissioner Tyler stated the approved Specific Plan document should agree with what they are approving. 15. Chairman Robbins stated he concurs with staff's recommendation on the street widening and retaining wall; timing for parking lot is acceptable as requested by the applicant; zero lot line and the meandering wall are also acceptable as requested by the applicant; and he has no problem with the lot sizes or building square footage. 16. Chairman Robbins reopened the public hearing portion of the hearing. Mr. Chevis Hosea, KSL Land Development, stated their objective is to be able to develop a project that is economically feasible. To do this they need a higher density created by allowing some flexibility on the lot sizes. 17. Mr. Reed stated they are in favor of this project. What they have an objection to is any houses built that are less than 1400 square 442 feet. Oil. G:\WPDOCS\PC 5-22-01 .wpd 11 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 18. Chairman Robbins closed the public comment portion of the hearing. 19. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Abets to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-080 recommending certification of an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report#41, as recommended ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Robbins. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 20. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-081 recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 2001-078, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Robbins. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 21. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Abets to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-082 recommending approval of Zone Change 2001-101, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Chairman Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 22. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-083 recommending approval of Specific Plan 121-# Amendment #5, as amended. a. Condition #10: Add meandering walls b. Condition #17: Minimum lot size is 6500 not abutting golf course, 6000 on golf course, and minimum livable square footage is 1900 square feet, excluding garages. C. Condition #19: Delete and replace with "Allow tandem parking in the garage to meet the parking requirement for four bedroom houses." d. Condition #22: Add, "Prior to final inspection of the 101h house the permanent parking lot shall be completed." e. Condition #23 : Planning Area III shall be allowed to have a zero lot line for swimming pools. 443 012 G:\WPD0CS\PC5-22-01.wpd 12 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Chairman Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 23. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Abets to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-084 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-703, as amended. a. Condition #2: Delete and replace with Condition #10 of the Specific Plan. b. Condition #3: Add "the wall design and materials will be compatible with the Duna La Quinta's perimeter wall." ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Robbins. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 24. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-085 recommending approval of Tentative Tract 30125, as amended. a. Condition #8.B(3): Change Lot (G) to Lot (H). b. Condition #27: The perimeter walls along Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50 shall be constructed at the time the homes are built along either of the two streets. The Community Development Department shall determine the portion of the wall that shall be installed when building permits are issued for the clubhouse. C. Condition #47.B.(2): Change Lot (G) to Lot (H). ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Robbins. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 25. Following discussion it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Abets to reconsider the motion and vote on Site Development Permit 2001-703. Unanimously approved. 26. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Abets to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-084 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-703, as modified: a. Condition #2 : delete and replace with Condition #10 of the 444 Specific Plan. 013 GAWPD0CS\PC5-22-01 .wpd 13 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 b. Condition #3; Add that the wall design and materials will be compatible with the Duna La Quinta perimeter wall. C. Condition #5: the perimeter walls along Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50 shall be constructed at the time the homes are built along either of the two streets. The Community Development Department shall determine the portion of the wall that shall be installed when building permits are issued for the clubhouse. C. Tentative Tract Mao 29858; a request of RJT Homes for review of an amendment to reconfigure seven acres in the southeast corner of the tract into 18 single family and other common lots located approximately 800 feet south of Avenue 50 and west of Jefferson Street, within Palmilla Specific Plan. 1. Chairman Robbins opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Robbins asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to clarify the number of houses to be built in each phase. Staff clarified the plan was referring to the size of the homes not the number of houses. Commissioner Tyler asked if this change had any affect on the water efficiency issue. Staff stated no. 3. Chairman Robbins questioned why Lot "D" on the legend is called out as a lake lot and yet Lot "D" on the map is listed as a landscape lot. Mr. Chris Bergh, MDS Consulting representing the applicant, stated it is a misprint. They should be reversed. 4. Chairman Robbins asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Chris Bergh was available for any questions. 5. There being no questions of the applicant, nor any other public comment, Chairman Robbins closed the public participation portion of the hearing and asked if there was any Commission discussion. 6. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioner Abels/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-086 recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 29858, Amendment #1, as recommended. 4 014 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-22-Ol.wpd 14 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 VII ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Chairman Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and NOES: None. ABSENT: None. D. Conditional Use Permit 2001-058 and Site Development Permit 2001- 693 a request of La Quinta Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses to allow the use and review of development plans for a church facility on 2.39 acres located on the east side of Dune Palms Road, between the Coachella Valley Storm Water Channel and Westward Ho Drive. 1. Chairman Robbins opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Staff informed the Commission that the applicant had requested a continuance to July 10, 2001, to allow time to revise their plans per the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee recommendations. 2. Chairman Robbins asked if there was a motion to continue Conditional Use Permit 2001-058 and Site Development Permit 2001-693. It was moved and second by Commissioners Tyler/Abets to continue Conditional Use Permit 2001-058 and Site Development Permit 2001-693, as recommended. Unanimously approved. E. Environmental Assessment 2001-418. General Plan Amendment 2001- 077, Zone Change 2001-100 a request of NRI, La Quinta Limited Partnership to change Riverside County zoning designation to Very Low Density Residential (RVL) and the General Plan designation to Very Low Density Residential (VLRD) for approximately 240 acres within the Sphere of Influence of the City of La Quinta for subsequent annexation bounded on the north by Avenue 52, on the east by Monroe Street, on the south by Avenue 53 and east of the existing City limits. 1. Chairman Robbins informed the Commission that the applicant had withdrawn their applications and no further action was required at this time. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. VIII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. Commissioner Tyler gave a report of the City Council meeting of May 15, 2001. 015 446 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-22-Ot.wpd 15 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 IX. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Butler to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held June 12, 2001, at 7:00 p.m. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 10:35 p.m. on May 22, 2001. Respectfully submitted, Betty awyer, Executive Secretary City of La Quinta, California 447 16 016 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-22-01 .wpd REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: 17 MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA APRIL 19, 2001 This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by Chairman Robert Wright at 3:03 p.m. who led the flag salute and asked for the roll call. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call. Present: Commissioners Irwin, Mitchell, Puente, Sharp, and Chairman Wright. Staff Present: Planning Manager Christine di lorio, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Secretary Carolyn Walker. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/Mitchell to approve the Minutes of March 22, 2001, as submitted. Unanimously approved. V. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Archaeological/Historical & Paleontological Resources Assessments for Tentative Tract 30092 adjacent to the City of La Quinta Riverside County California, located at the northwest corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 58. Applicant: Barton Properties - Archaeological Consultant: Archaeological Advisory Group (James Brock RPA) and Paleontological Consultant: CRM Tech (Harry Quinn). 1 . Planning Manager di lorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. PACAR0LYMHPC4-19-01.wpd -1- 448 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes April 19, 2001 2. Commissioner Sharp asked if the location of the project was close to the Torres -Martinez land and had the Tribe been notified of the project. 3. Planning Manager di lorio replied that the project was not close to their property. 4. Chairman Wright stated he thought this area was formerly under 80 feet of water. 5. Commissioner Irwin added it was, as well as the reservation. 6. Commissioners Mitchell, Irwin, Sharp and Puente all concurred with staff's recommendation. 7. Chairman Wright also agreed with staff's recommendations. 8. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Mitchell/Puente to adopt Minute Motion 2001-008 recommending approval of the 1). Archaeological/Historical and 2). Paleontological Resources Assessments for Tentative Tract 30092, adjacent to the City of La Quinta, located at the northwest corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 58. Unanimously approved. B. Report on Archaeological Monitoring for Aliso I (Tract 27519 and Aliso II (Tract 29563) projects located northwest of the intersection of Dune Palms Road and Westward Ho Drive. Applicant: Century -Crowell Communities - Archaeological Consultant: Archaeological Advisory Group (James Brock RPA). 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Commissioner Mitchell concurred with staff's findings. 3. Commissioner Irwin asked if the effect of the Whitewater River was reflected anywhere in the report. 4. Planning Manager di lorio questioned whether she was referring to the first report. 0Q2 P:\CAROLYN\HPC4-19-0 L"d -2 449 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes April 19, 2001 5. Commissioner Irwin replied, yes and added, at one time, the Whitewater River was as wide as the Colorado River. She wondered, since so little had been found in this highly sensitive area, if it was due to the height of the project area. 6. Planning Manager di lorio replied she would review the initial report and get back to the Commission. 7. Chairman Wright asked if the archaeologist was recommending monitoring. 8. Commissioner Puente, as well as Chairman Wright, asked if there would be a final report, or if this was the final report. 9. Planning Manager di lorio answered this was the final report because there was a Negative Declaration determination with no monitoring recommended. 10. Commissioner Irwin and Chairman Wright commented on the clarity of Mr. Brock's reports and thanked him for including the colored photos and maps, which gives the Commissioners a better visualization of the project. 1 1 . There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Puente/Mitchell to adopt Minute Motion 2001-009 accepting the report on Archaeological Monitoring for Aliso I and Aliso II projects, located northwest of the intersection of Dune Palms Road and Westward Ho Drive. Unanimously approved. C. Revised Historical/Archaeological Resources Report - Palm Desert National Bank Sim located at the southeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 47. 1 . Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Commissioner Mitchell concurred with staff's recommendation. 3. Commissioner Irwin also agreed, and questioned Page 10 where it states ... "A local register of historical resources..." "...means a list of properties officially designated or recognized as historically significant by a local government... She wanted to know if now 003 P:\CAROLYN\HPC4-19-Ol.wpd -3- 4 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes April 19, 2001 was the time to bring up the subject of historic plaques. The Burkett Ranch and Point Happy were being developed and she thought the Commission should discuss the inclusion of plaques to designate these historic areas. 4. Planning Manager di lorio informed the Commission that on April 17`h, the City Council approved the Specific Plan, Parcel Map and the Site Development Permit for a bank that was being built on the corner of the old Burkett Ranch property. At that time, Council Member Henderson requested adding a condition that the developer provide a historic plaque under the following time frame: 1) The language of the plaque shall be done prior to issuance of the grading permit; 2) The placement and design of the plaque shall be done prior to issuance of building permit; and 3) The plaque shall be installed prior to final occupancy of the bank building. 5. Commissioner Irwin asked if those conditions would only apply to that property, or to all historic properties being developed. 6. Planning Manager di lorio stated it would refer to this property only, but the Commission could consider putting a program together for plaques for other historic properties in the future. 7. Commissioner Irwin also asked if a plaque would be included on different types of sites, such as, a homestead, or an Indian village, since they are still very significant regardless of what is found on the property. The site is still historic. 8. Commissioner Sharp stated there should be some consistency in the design of these plaques. 9. Planning Manager di lorio thought it might be better to bring this subject up when Debbie Powell, Management Assistant presented her Grant Proposal to the Commission. 10. Chairman Wright added it was an important point the Commission needed to address. 11. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Sharp/Puente to adopt Minute Motion 2001-010 accepting the Revised Historical/Archaeological Resources Report for the Palm Desert National Bank site. Unanimously approved. 451 P:\CAROLYN\HPC4-19-Ol.wpd -4- 004 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes April 19, 2001 D. Review of a Grant Proposal to the State Office of Historic Preservation for Historic/Archaeological Preservation Plan Historic Context Statement, and Revised Historic Preservation Ordinance. Applicant: City of La Quinta. 1. Debbie Powell, Management Assistant, presented the report on the Grant Proposal and asked for any comments from the Commissioners. 2. Commissioner Irwin asked about the time frame for the Grant. 3. Management Assistant Powell explained how the grant had been structured to allow time to complete the work within the time frame. 4. Commissioner Mitchell thought this was a wonderful idea and was very pleased the City of La Quinta was doing this. 5. Commissioner Irwin agreed it was a fantastic idea and was pleased to be going forward with the plans. 6. Planning Manager di lorio stated part of the Grant project would be to expand identification of historic structures from the previous Historic Resources Survey. 7. Commissioner Irwin thought there were 52 original home sites in the Cove area, with about 37 that had not been significantly altered. 8. Planning Manager di lorio stated the homeowners of the structures that had already been altered, might also benefit from the survey and the historic information it would provide. It would be nice to have the resources available if they are interested in preserving the design and architectural integrity of their homes. 9. Commissioner Sharp asked if any of these homeowners would be interested in restoration. 10. Planning Manager di lorio replied she had received several inquiries from interested homeowners P:\CAROLYN\HPC4-19-01.wpd -5- 005 45? Historic Preservation Commission Minutes April 19, 2001 11. Chairman Wright stated most of the people he talked with who owned historic homes, wanted to fix them up. He then asked Commissioner Sharp if he had received the previous Historic Structure Survey which included pictures and descriptions of the properties already listed. 12. Commissioner Sharp replied he had not. 13. Planning Manager di lorio stated copies of the previous Historic Structure Survey would be given to Commissioners Sharp and Mitchell. 14. Commissioner Sharp was concerned the historic preservation program could have a negative affect on local development. 15. Planning Manager di lorio stated the program would enable the City to work with the homeowners to provide guidelines to ensure compatibility with historic structures. 16. Commissioner Sharp asked if it was the spirit of historic preservation rather than a rigid archaeological reconstruction program. 17. Planning Manager di lorio replied the Commission would not get involved in minor remodeling issues such as paint colors. The Commission would only be involved when there would be irreparable damage to the structure. If a homeowner was planning an addition, the City would like to talk to them about the possibility of putting any additions in the rear, as opposed to being visible from the front. An exception would be the old style garages. 18. Commissioner Sharp stated if it is more generic in nature and more accommodating to the homeowners preferences, he was in favor of the program. 19. Commissioner Puente stated the Grant was needed to update the previous report and add more details that may have been missed on the previous report. 20. Commissioner Sharp asked if the plaques would be included in this program. P:\CAROLYN\HPC4-19-01.wpd -6- 0O C 453 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes April 19, 2001 21. Planning Manager di lorio replied it might be. 22. Chairman Wright commented on how far the Commission had come since 1994. 23. Commissioner Sharp stated he had seen a report that the City's population had increased 1 1 1 %. 24. Management Assistant Powell answered that was correct as stated in the current census. 25. Chairman Wright and Commissioner Puente remarked on how much the City had grown in the eight years the Commission has been functioning. 26. There being no further discussion, the report was accepted as presented. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS A. There was a general discussion about transportation and accommodations for the upcoming Millenium and Preservation Conferences in May. B. Telecommunications Towers Materials. 1. Chairman Wright asked if telecommunications equipment was going to be installed at the La Quinta Hotel. Planning Manager di lorio replied there would not be a telecommunications antenna in the La Quinta Hotel tower. It would be placed further back adjacent to one of the larger buildings on the east side of the service road. a. Commissioner Irwin asked what type of tower would be used. b. Commissioner Sharp stated the tower would resemble a palm tree, but was unsure of the technical name. P:\CAROLYN\HPC4-19-Ol.wpd -7- 007 454 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes April 19, 2001 C. Commissioner Irwin stated it would be a "monopalm". d. Planning Manager di lorio stated she had recently met with Verizon, AT&T, and Sprint and all three companies were interested in installing antennas in the La Quinta Cove Resort. e. Commissioner Irwin stated there had been plans for an antenna to be installed in the clock tower of the ballroom. f. Planning Manager di lorio stated those plans were no longer being pursued. AT&T was now looking at moving one of their towers closer to Eisenhower Drive. Vill. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/Mitchell to adjourn this meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission to a special meeting to be held on May 24, 2001. This meeting of the Historical Preservation Commission was adjourned at 3:29 p.m., April 19, 2001. Unanimously approved. Submitted by: Carolyn alker Secretary P:\CAR0LYN\HPC4-19-01.wpd -8- 008 455 REPORTANFORMATIONAL ITEM: /9 MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA May 2, 2001 CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee was called to order at 10:03 a.m. by Planning Manager Christine di lorio, who led the flag salute. B. Committee Members present: Dennis Cunningham and Bill Bobbitt. It was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to excuse Committee Member Reynolds. Unanimously approved. C. Staff present: Planning Manager Christine di lorio, Planning Consultant Nicole Criste, Associate Planner Wally Nesbit, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Planning Manager Christine di lorio asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of April 18, 2001. There being no corrections, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Cunningham to approve the minutes as submitted. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Site Development Permit 2001-704; a request of Mr. Peter Bilicki for review of an 18 lot development of two prototypes with three and two facade treatments, respectively, and landscape design plans located along Peninsula Lane within PGA West. Associate Planner Wally Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Cunningham stated he had no issues with the project and that controls inside gated communities are adequate to deal with new units. 456 GAWPD0CS\ALRC5-2-01.wnd 1 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes May 2, 2001 3. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he had no objections to the project. 4. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2001-019 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-704 subject to conditions as recommended. Unanimously approved. B. Site Development Permit 2000-701; a request of CRV La Quinta 70, Limited Partnership for review of architectural and landscape plans for two new prototype residential units each with three facades located at the northwest corner of Bellerive and Winged Foot within PGA West 1. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Cunningham asked staff to identify the location. Mr. Peter Bilicki noted on the plans the location. Committee Member Cunningham stated he had no issues with the project. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he had no questions or objections to the project. 4. Mr. R. C. Hobbs asked for clarification as to when a compatibility review was required. Staff explained when a compatibility review was required. Discussion followed regarding compatibility. 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Cunningham to adopt Minute Motion 2001-020, recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-701, subject to the conditions C. Site Development Permit 2001-702; a request of La Quinta Kingdom Hall of Jehovah Witnesses for review of landscaping and architectural plans for a church on 2.39 acres on the east side of Dune Palms Road, between Westward Ho Drive and the Coachella Valley Storm Channel. 1. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. G:\WPDOCS\ALRC5-2-0l.wpd 2 002 457 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes May 2, 2001 2. Committee Member Bobbitt asked staff to identify the location of the project. Planning Manager Christie di lorio stated it was next to the mobile home park and across from the High School. Committee Member Bobbitt asked what zoning was required for a church. Staff stated it could go anywhere with a conditional use permit. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he concurred with staff's recommendation. 3. Committee Member Cunningham stated they have a long way to go architecturally before the building elevations could be approved. The applicant needs to be more involved with the community around where the building will be built. He recognizes there may be financial constraints, but they should obtain assistance from a professional architect to add detail to the building as this building is within the public eye. 4. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he concurred. If they do not want any windows, then some type of architectural style should be added to the street frontage. 5. Committee Members Cunningham stated this is not the typical architectural style that has been approved in La Quinta. 6. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2001-022 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-702, subject to the conditions as amended: a. Condition #1: replace the main gable roof with a hip roof. b. Condition #6: 1.5 inch caliper size tree. Unanimously approved. D. Specific Plan 121-E Amendment #4 and Site Development Permit 2001- 773; a request of R. C. Hobbs Company/KSL Company for review of landscaping and architectural plans each with three facades, including perimeter landscaping for a 17.82 acre site. 1. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Bobbitt asked what the wall would consist of. Mr. Hobbs, the applicant, stated it would be stuccoed. Committee Member Bobbitt stated his concern was that a "power wall", filled G:\WPDOCS\ALRC5-2-0l.wpd 3 003 454 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes May 2, 2001 with foam, would not allow vines to be attached. Mr. Forrest Haag, landscape architect for the project, stated they used the trellis at the La Quinta Resort instead of the conventional use of screws. 3. Committee Member Cunningham stated that foam walls were not allowed in Palm Desert. 4. Committee Member Bobbitt elaborated on the problems they have with the "power wall" at PGA West. Mr. Hobbs noted they were not on a zero lot, but had five foot setbacks which gave them more room for landscaping. 5. Committee Member Bobbitt asked the height of the tower element. Staff stated 22 feet as noted on the site plan. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he liked the project. 6. Committee Member Cunningham stated he like the project. 7. Planning Manager Christine di lorio asked what the rear elevation would look like as it will be seen from the street. Committee Member Cunningham stated there was enough articulation that it did not matter. 8. Committee Member Bobbitt stated his concern about the planting of trees when there is not enough room for tree growth and how they become a maintenance issue. 9. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2001-022 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-703, subject to the conditions. Unanimously approved. E. Site Development Permit 2001-693; a request of JR Properties for The 990 Stores for review of landscaping and architectural plans for a shopping center including a 23,000 square foot store. 1. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Mr. Jeff Rothbard, representing JR Properties, stated they agreed with Conditions #1-5. On Condition #6 they would like to request a reduction from eight feet to six feet on the split block. On 004 G\WPDOCS\ALRC5-2-Ol.wpd 4 459 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes May 2, 2001 Conditions #7 and #8 they would like to discuss them as they relate to the awnings and the applicant's identify. Condition #10, the concern about the eight foot tree wells coming out into the drive aisles. On Condition #12, the location where staff has indicated the trees is the pedestrian access point out to the street. Planning Manager Christine di lorio clarified they had to provide access from a public sidewalk and currently Jack in the Box has a sidewalk to a certain point and staff was looking for this applicant to provide a circulation plan to identify the public access. Discussion followed regarding the pedestrian access and landscaping. 3. Committee Member Cunningham stated that from a design standpoint, he would like to see that it is designed not to just meet the requirements so that it does become user friendly. Need to have a sensitivity to the design to show that it will be designed to be used. Staff stated they need to show access to Home Depot as well as from the street to their site. Mr. Rothbard stated his concern was keeping enough parking stalls and visibility from the street on to the tenants. They are finding it hard to find enough tenants for the remainder of the site because of the visibility from the street. 4. Committee Member Cunningham stated that is due to the design of the property. The stores are in the back. You do want a sign that is 50-feet high so it can be seen and the community complains they do not want all the clutter. Therefore the store owner ends up reduce the rental costs. 5. Staff reviewed the conditions stating that there was no issue with Conditions #1-11. Condition #12 would be reworded to state, "Pedestrian access be designed with sensitivity with attractive landscaping." Staff clarified that they were in agreement with Conditions #1-5. The applicant is requesting Condition #6 be reduced in size for the split face block from eight to six. Commissioner Cunningham requested it remain at eight feet. 6. Staff stated they were asking that Condition #7 be amended to have all columns being faced with limestone up to eight feet and take on a feature that was proposed on Building "B". 7. Mr. Jim Berlin, representing The 990 Stores, stated one of the difficulties they face as a company, is that they originated the concept for this type of store. There are a lot of knock off stores out there and they regularly get phone calls from customers who 005 G:\WPDOCS\ALRC5-2-01.wpd 5 4Gn Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes May 2, 2001 are confusing their store with the others. In order to distance themselves from the knock -off stores, they designed the awning and retrofitted their stores. The awning and tile on the pilasters are their identify. They can do something with the awning colors and perhaps put them closer against the wall. 8. Committee Member Cunningham asked if everyone of their store in all cities look exactly the same. Mr. Berlin stated no. Committee Member Cunningham asked that the applicant give some sensitivity to what La Quinta is trying to maintain in regard to architectural style. The problem is that with box stores, staff has made an effort to create some continuity between the buildings. 9. Mr. Berlin asked if they could duplicate the arch as Home Depot has and use the blue in a tubular design on the parapet that is flush to the building. Staff asked if it was an awning or structural component. Mr. Berlin stated it would be tubular steel or a metal sheet that would be flush with the parapet. Discussion followed regarding a potential design. 10. Committee Member Cunningham stated he was not opposed to the blue tile but on the individual columns because they were far enough from the street, it gives personal identity for the store that would tie into whatever is done with the signs. Staff suggested keeping Condition 7 as written and add Condition 8.A. stating "a blue tubular steel element similar to Home Depot, may be permitted above the storefront." Mr. Berlin stated this will give them more than what they are proposing. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste stated no, what they are proposing is more, but staff is not. Mr. Berlin stated they were not in agreement with what was being proposed. 1 1 . Committee Member Cunningham asked what businesses currently has awnings. Staff reviewed what was existing on the current storefronts in the area. Committee Member Cunningham stated that he would not object to an awning that was between the central columns, flush at the top and projected out two feet at the bottom. Discussion followed as to the look and location of the awnings. 12. Committee Member Cunningham asked if there was going to be a bike path along the rear elevation. Planning Manager Christine di lorio stated staff will be requesting a wall with openings `) be G:\WPDOCS\ALRC5-2-Ol.wpd 6 '" O -"en+ 461 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes May 2, 2001 constructed when it goes to the Planning Commission. Committee Member Cunningham stated his concern was that the whatever trees are planted they be able to sustain the growth until the bike path is constructed. 13. Committee Member Bobbitt asked where the air conditioning units would be placed. Staff stated on the roof and would be screened. 14. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Cunningham/Bobbitt adopt Minute Motion 2001-024 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-693, subject to the conditions as modified. a. Condition #12: Pedestrian access with sensitivity to attractive landscaping. b. Condition 8.A: a single awning not extending beyond the columns of the central columns of The 990 Store may be permitted, flush with the columns and extending two feet out at the bottom. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None VIII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on June 6, 2001. This meeting was adjourned at 1 1:40 a.m. on May 2, 2001. Respectfully submitted, J � BE SAWYE , Executive Secretary City of La Quinta, California 007 G:\WPDOCSWLRC5-2-0l.wpd 7 La�TQ DEPARTMENT REPORT: I — A 4a�w �5 �FMOF rt�9 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager J d/ „nV DATE: June 19, 2001 RE: Department Report — Response(s) to Public Comments The following is the response to public comments made at the June 5, 2001 City Council meeting: 1 . Mr. Mark Wasserman, of Waste Management of the Desert, announced that new 64-gallon recycling containers would be distributed to residents in La Quinta during the week, and that smaller 32-gallon containers would be available upon request. No additional response was necessary. 2. Mr. Robert Tyler, 44-215 Villeta Drive, addressed the City Council regarding the need to reduce emergency response times. The Council expressed that the issue is a high priority to the City. No additional response was necessary. 3. Mr. Wally Reynolds, 79-860 Fiesta Drive, asked if the City was anticipating using eminent domain proceedings on properties along Jefferson Street in the Westward Ho area and, if so, would the City reimburse property owners for assessment payments made on sewer and street improvements. The Public Works Director/City Engineer informed Mr. Reynolds that a feasibility study is in progress and, therefore, eminent domain issues have not been decided. Mr. Reynolds was also informed that any sewer and street improvements would be factored into home appraisals. 4. Mr. Edwin O'Conner, representing the Painted Cove Homeowners Association, addressed the City Council regarding high speeds on Park Avenue. Mr. Edwin stated that the high speeds make it difficult for residents to exit the development. 463 Staff has previously talked with Mr. O'Conner regarding the issue. Mr. O'Conner was advised that a radar trailer has been placed on Park Avenue, near the entrance to Painted Cove. In addition, the La Quinta Police Department has been alerted, and will be exploring efforts to increase enforcement in the area. 4� t D02 DEPARTMENT REPORT: s-A JUNE 25 JUNE 26 JULY 3 JULY 17 JULY 25-27 AUGUST 7 AUGUST 21 SEPTEMBER 18 CITY COUNCIL'S UPCOMING EVENTS CVAG GENERAL ASSEMBLY (BLYTHE) SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING - BUDGET CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS FORUM - MONTEREY CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING 465 June 2001 Monthly Planner Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 May u y S MT W T F S S MT W T F S 6 7 8 9101112 8 91011121314 13 14 15 16 t7 18 19 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 31 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 6:00 PM CVAG- 2:00 PM City 10:00 AM ALRC 6:00 PM Volun- Exec Com-Pena Council teer Firemen's Meeting Dinner 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 12:00 PM Transp. 7:00 PM C.V. 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM -Perkins Mosquito Pena Energy/Envi- 6:00 PM League Abate. -Perkins 5:30 PM Invest- Sniff of Cities-Riv.Div. 7:00 PM Plan- ment Advisory 7:00 PM Cultural 7:00 PM Commu- ning Commis- Board Arts Commission o Services Commission sion Meeting S. Flag Day 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 9:00 AM CVB- 3:30 PM Historic Henderson Preservation Father's Day 2:00 PM City Commission Council Meeting 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 6:00 PM CVAG- 7:00 PM Plan- 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM Exec Com-Pena ning Commis- Human/Comm- LAFCO- CVAG General sion Meeting Adolph Henderson Assembly- 4:00 PM DRRA Blythe Airp-Henderson Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 6/14/2001 July 2001 Monthly Planner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2:00 PM City Indepen- 12:00 PM Council dence Mayors Lunch Meeting Day (City Hall Closed) 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V. 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM Safety -Perkins Mosquito Pena Energy/Envi- 12:00 PM Transp. Abate. -Perkins 10:00 AM ARLC Sniff -Perkins 7:00 PM Plan- 5:30 PM Invest- 7:00 PM Cultural 7:00 PM Commu- ning Commis- ment Advisory Arts Commission nity Services Commission sion Meeting Board 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 9:00 AM CVB- 3:30 PM Historic Henderson Preservation 2:00 PM City Commission Council Meeting 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6:00 PM League 7:00 PM Plan- 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM of Calif. Cities- ning Commis- Human/Comm- LAFCO- Riv.Div. sion Meeting Adolph Henderson - 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson 29 30 31 6:00 PM CVAG- Exec Com-Pena June August S MT W T F S S MT W T F S 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 17 18 19 20 21 2223 1920 21 2223 2425 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30 31 a Creator Plus on 6/14/2001 46 Printed by Calendar August 2001 Monthly Planner .. .. -. .. . .. . 1 2 3 4 10:00 AM ALRC 5- Ju y September S MT W T F S S MT W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 6 7 13 14 2 3 9 10 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 29 30 31 30 w. e 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2:00 PM City 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM Council Pena Energy/Envi- Meeting 5:30 PM Invest- Sniff ment Advisory 7:00 PM Cultural Board Arts Commission 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V. 3:30 PM Historic Safety -Perkins Mosquito Preservation 12:00 PM Transp. Abate. -Perkins Commission -Perkins 7:00 PM Plan- 6:00 PM League ning Commis - of Cities-Riv.Div. sion Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9:00 AM CVB- 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM Henderson Human/Comm- LAFCO- 2:00 PM City Adolph Henderson Council 4:00 PM DRRA Meeting Airp-Henderson 26 27 28 29 30 31 ;; 6:00 PM CVAG- 7:00 PM Plan- Exec Com-Pena ning Commis- Fs`•'` sion Meeting k- 'w Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 6/14/2001 468 September 2001 Monthly Planner City Council 10:00 AM ALRC 12:00 PM Meeting- Mayors Lunch Cancelled Labor Day (City Hall Closed) 10:00 AM Public 17:00 PM C.V. 19:00 AM RCTC- 112:00 PM Safety -Perkins Mosquito Pena Energy/Envi- 12:00 PM TransP. Abate. -Perkins 5:30 PM Invest- Sniff -Perkins 7.00 PM Plan- ment Advisory 7:00 PM Cultural 6:00 PM League Wing Commis- Board Arts Commission of Cities-Riv.DIV. sion Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission 9:00 AM CVB- 3:30 PM Historic Henderson Preservation 2:00 PM City Commission Council Meeting 6:00 PM CVAG- 7:00 PM Plan - Exec Com-Pena ning Commis- sion Meeting 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM Human/Comm- LAFCO- Adolph Henderson 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson F 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 7 S M T W T F S 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 6/14/2001 469 DEPARTMENT REPORT: J4— A a 4S cE`y OF TKti� TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tom Hartung, Director of Building & Safety l DATE: June 19, 2001 RE: Monthly Department Report - May 2001 Attached please find the statistical summaries for building permits, Animal Control, Code Compliance, and business licenses for the month of May. The reports depict the following highlights: • Year to date building permit valuation is $77,695,522.35 which represents an issuance of 1,447 building permits through May; • 1,367 animal control cases have been handled through May; • 1,362 code compliance cases have been initiated through May; • 11 new licenses were issued to La Quinta based businesses in May. 44() O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O �- N 0 0 0 0Lu o O o 0 0 o ao O O N O V G G C O O O O O O O O O fG U p m w n w mw w w w w w w w w w N w w w CL L) J m m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O tp � m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m a= v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a Z Z w r Qf w w O O O N O Y'l � O O ilJ O O C N b I� O m N V n �I1 V N O N N N O O m m OD W A M E9 M m V n m N m W N Q O w (A m w m m Q m V (A N ( w m N V w � w !h w 00 V W Nw w w < w w w fNV A W w H IL i w N f N O O O IA O N O O m O O O N M V O O L()q O N O N OLLI O ICl � O O M N n 01 C f N w w w rn m n m R O w w N n A Z m w w v vi v » m w M o r w M n � O in w m O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O N O (n m V m O O O O IA O O N N V O m m Oi m n O) n n n N m O N N O I() N N p m N N M O) m OJ m O O m O fV V1 LL'1 n C1 V N r n OD M (p M I� w Mw Nw n M Z J o cli Mw bag w F 0 C�1 d G F m w W g�"> D 0 W a V1 O (O I� T 6 6 (6 Y'1 O O 6 07 O 06 6 C6 OV Q Ol w m M m If) m O O O Ill w m N V N Fr _ Z p O I(i n n O M C' CA O V N N A N O 1l m N U? p Q r m N M M N to N m M � n m ill O M N O l7 M w m V N m N N N Ol J U m M F z Z 171 O O N O O O O m O O O O O O O O N Q OJ O O O O O O O m O O V O O O O I() N V O O m O O O M O O O M O O O m A 2 w w m w N w w w N F O N O LLOS V ONO O m �M0 Z N OD Q V m N M m l() N M m O O Nw w f9 fA N t9 w Nw w w n I� OI w w w m V V N M Vl m N N m M O M n W M In N N V N m N gyp- J w M O m N V M m N V M N O V N A _ p W w Z a= w W O O O m N m n N O O N o M O o o N w N p i N a' Q W w p y ❑ 7 Q ErR Q g J J J Q Z O J J Z O w U J J g J J Z < aa O w r g w w wo w °' OS O w w O0 w T ¢ Z O w wr ~O m W a ❑ af K f 471 002 ANIMAL CONTROL REPORT FOR: May, 2001 Steve Alexander and Jackie Misuraca ►11\� li•%\11WG1K 9 May Does Alive 33 Dead 6 OTI 2 Cats Alive 23 Dead 7 Other Animals Alive 24 Dead 12 TOTAL ANIMALS YEAR TO YEAR TO INCIDENTS YEAR TO YEAR TO DATE O1 DATE 00 HANDLED May DATE 01 DATE 00 190 210 Bite Reports 4 13 12 20 53 Animal Trap 19 0 Set Ups 7 39 38 80 54 Cruelty to 32 33 Animals 0 5 7 51 34 Vicious Animal 36 43 Restraining 0 0 1 Alive 80 321 298 Dead 25 88 129 OTI 2 19 0 TOTAL ANIMALS REMOVED 107 428 427 VIOLATIONS: No Owner Warnings Dogs at Large 27 2 Noise Disturbance 0 0 Defecation removal 0 0 License Violation 0 0 Other 0 0 Monthly Total 27 2 Special Hour Patrols 9 38 43 Zoning Violations 1 11 3 Lost & Found 39 176 135 Animal Rescue 0 6 18 Outside Agency --0-- 0 11 City Reclaims 10 53 44 Other 18 75 94 TOTALS 88 416 406 Citations 9 0 0 16 0 25 YEAR TO DATE 144 18 361 TOTAL MONTHLY INCIDENTS HANDLED: MU 01- 249 / May 00 - 173 YEAR TO DATE INCIDENTS HANDLED: May O1 - 1367 / May 00 - 1 144 472' G-3 CODE COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR: May, 2001 May Of YEAR TO DATE 01 YEAR TO DATE 00 ABATEMENTS: Nuisance Abatements Started 51 770 247 Weed Abatements Started 8 56 22 Vehicle Abatements Started 78 531 391 Dwelling Abatements Started 1 5 51 TOTAL STARTED 138 1362 711 TOTAL COMPLETED 172 1027 _ 946 Home Occu ap tion Inspections 11 45 57 Business License Inspections 0 13 84 Garage sale permits Issue 124 632 634 473 ;r-°4 /\(\\\\\\\\\ 71 k « « « « « < z'¥QQQQ#22222 l333333333G3 2lsssseesss5 474 C§5 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 5-A 5 Tiht4a�w �FM OF Ltd �w TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: JERRY HERMAN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: JUNE 19, 2001 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MAY 2001 Attached please find a copy of the Community Development Report which outlines the current cases processed by staff for the month of May. 475 PAMonthly Department Report.wpd 1 z W cc Q a W a F- a Z W LLI = F- o a z N O W >- ��� W oa W H � Z CD C O U z _O U a z O H a v wQ) a E 0 U 0) -a a) Y o a) Y -0 O Y -0 a) Y -a m Y -a 0 Y 'a a) Y -0 a) Y -a Q) Y 2 'Y a) -0 m Y -0 a) Y -o a) Y 70 a) Y -a a) Y -0 a) Y 0 0) Y E a Y E Y E Y_ E Y E n Y E a Y E Y_ E a Y E a a) °- c Y E Y_ E .0 > Y E -0 a > Y E � > Y E -0 > Y E> -0 > 0 a) ul N N N N N N u) N ^ N N W O u! N O •- N N r LO O tt7 O O O Y a) 0 0 U W d N CL a) a 0 Y y Q7 > Y a) 7 LL m a O U N a) y E M a N N Q 0 c V) c E w 7 0 Q a) c J Y O - 0 a a O H O a) 0 c� c Ic in Q 0 a) a Y 0 �> O U C o a ; U 0 LL fn (n E d 0) fn N C c E¢ Q N O U 0) c c O N N C a) V)) a) +@+ C a) E o > C W N N L U a) c O N Y E a a C E a o > a) 0 U 0 a O a) m 2 N U Oat m w y > N Y N s a c @ d N z 0 F a) .0 � L c 'O m E m s a) a) OU C7 N U U 4 Q) a a �- cn O > LD m > C O a) a> CL Q 0000 N LONO U a -o a) a co 1 U U -o a> > m+ 0 N aai y a a �E O wZw T m 3 o co m d a y ro >> o �_ (0 , aU 00 N 00 0 d 7 c 00 L a >> O O as LO CN Lo a-U U m fn N M " m 0) -0 I, C L d m `7 O7 d d ` m O •u1 O N y U m a) E Q C_ 7 N �,,, i- O O) 7 C E CL @ L L c 'O O' N fn m C C a) C O> L m M_ O y m m > Q ,c C m @ O '6 C a) a -0 N W ul a 'O m 0)C a) 3 a o 0 o w v° U O io �O CO c cr- o n co 0 m o E a OF .2 m >_ 3 N c(n m` L p o o ai N E N N N o �- 0- (n -00 H U W m m "' f0 O..- C O E a 0> o C g m c c m. E C m Lm ° o m 0 m a) y f0 ° w Z a' o a o ++ m a° y ++ E y .c p7 a o ai ++ 7 m 7 E N '� C c N Q C f0 Q) ,� c T 0. 3 C f6 C� N E •D C a) Cr c FL ` E m� 'N a) O L 'O C E Q O M m U 7 a+ 00 m .0 O. d N 'O ;� m> w *' a) Q -EO '- 0) ++ N 00 U m a) N N L w M N p fc0 > 00 00 = C 6 7 m C L a) U ++ f0 cn O >. O7 `- a) Q a' E U 7 O) 7 m + U a� a� C m- c L a) a� m O c C7 T O C U 7 .� 7 E N N a0 e- + r Q p O F a) �= C a) 0 c or 0 Q m L U T -O L m m co E N 'y �O Q EO @ -o O y o rn L E ,.J m o O coC �C 7 U r 9� L[) E •X •� m m N U O 7 Q� +L+ .2 0O c N O O a m E ++ ++ 'O O C oa$ 3 C m_ = a a m o c aCi Co a Q L c `n c m cn m m g y m +c` m (m-a -o m E o m c m° cca o° c 3 cc m «° nQ-awFL o !Ea orZ>� m U m Uw-oa c m m m y><n n O rn m itL c rn 0) - E 3 m U� Q O U N c a Z Q m w W U 07 a � U O N U rn O •� 4t Ong 00 > Mpa x a E aa) c7 a in a '+- F- ~ p c cn co cn ° .0 co N Qn M O It(Q m Q T M OCR O y CN (O O a a p N m O O ? gyp ��-' NO E 00 O L 4N 0) O� o0a yr Q > C QN O M c° a i IL 00a CLQ CNn UOv M s c LS. '0 E a Q. QN L-0 [[ Qaa N LO O m> c O C Q U N W N LO Lo > -O 0 O_ > a,+ Q O C�i C)o Qa Lo N r` y LO V V m QaU N > 0 a Q O C .0 C a) ox 0 a) >> O O sQO Q Q , 0DLr) aU N O a> N r I' V a Qd 0 O 00 . 'O a) > a Q ' LO a L_ Cr N J cO c m E CA o s c Q �++ y C O 0C N N (O N LO N� I co I r, LO W to I� , i , i aUaU N N LO 0 YO d> 0 c o c QQ 'yn C O Q UO , N M W N LO ,, I �/�� Lo LO W CD , i , I daUU Q c — o� c off} -0 00 w o co O cn 0 ++ 0 N to �,,, LO O W E *' CO LO O cn ` m E O C Q N C N m EQ > @ •� N> z (n> mQ G= M LO E N C 0 N N ID O m _0 N a) 'O J 0" 'O L 3� -� E 0 c o no, o (n o� cn a> oc ai En O N ` O m O LO Q> co (OTa) rm o a °al � o c E t 7 m C L n c Cp co m, Q U 00 L 0 '++ N N E 0 0 0 to N - LO � O Lo ��> C C m N a m a) d a) C o (n x cn C 0 a� m o c E c 0 m � a o c o w m c c y o N L Q .� O U M 0 N 0 y '� C 0) 'O N LO c U O a..1 N '00 .� 0 Yn 0 a' m O C (O @m a) 7 0 c m O�.> aQ 00 0 QQ O mL E m O o 'rn m y — y c o c c m c o j d v C7 c aa)i 3 '_ y � o °� m ° o x 0 N m dS o x c o m m a Q .° a> CO 0 c m > " LU O C U m co U C O_ E m` 0 cn 0 O N O a y Q Y YO Lp m co O > . a o o C O m a) U QO (n 0 U m LO 0 O +, to ? @ O fn O_ cc — O LL .O O ++ m ` a) .- 0 LO _ co >a)0 _O Y .co 0 a� -C 41) 0 y QdO N a 0 ai a Oco yc0 Ec a>3 ) m c 0 c Q c �> 'c? C � c M N .0 0 D: (n LO Q m M N W' U (n E O W CL f' O O (n N M 00 U) Ltj a7 .. LO m N 0 o cod O O O d� N N C N N cc a) F- Hc cn Nd N� M (6U m am 00 L� LO Z (o (o > 0Ni o q q(a'o� O O p to M O _ O wm _ O 11 O co _ O 0 Y O O O O O O LO O O C O= > (O N c dp rLUO d0N I- 00000 O (n (n J H 0: (n N U 0 N (D N .- Kii ml . M 0A O > aC Q c 0 N U i j O W U LO r� U U Q a a > a> Q CL . a N Q L j W Ci LO U Q a M (o rn c W a) = y O U o M Lo rn c co (L) _ !� O U o a) > 0 C Q -o a) a Q N O N '" LO CO U U a U O U a N f9 I (O n U U a U O n n n U U a U rn co N O o O C L W y O O 0 O co N i0 cn C fN O !EO c 0 U m 7 > a) CL O U m a a) C • U m L (n E V) m O Z �� o Q° o w~ E N .r ++ 0 0 a) c W a L � co U E N �: O •m j N 0 m O_ N7 O _0 m a) 0 ° a) c O O w y 7 >, O C E E a) 3 U) '++ .. E Cl) O O y c 0 + ° c m m a ° o m � ° ° c d ° w °° ° —y o � `c o 0-0 m U) 0 r U °° 0 a Q+. O N E ° a"' z 0 C a) o O °� ++ m L rnL a) C O o c W N 3 c y CO m > c m Q ° 'O L �' y Co U O a N (3) m `0 N N a O O N LO +T 7 0 C Y C U .` cep L O m CO O ° O m 3 a) M C w- a) c ° L C 0= O m a 0 m a In (O > O m a) m W m U 70- >° C `o N m a C a) m O a) C m a) o Q a) .N a) a. O f Co 7 a) 0) o: p m 3 a) ° m Q — n U > c° + 0 c E � o. m a) a) -0 -0 y a m U 0) =o O m 0 0 a 3 ,c a a°> 3 > > E cs n E L N E p m a °- m O y a) a) :� (n m 0 0 C m a 7 a) N C ` 4 N 00 >• y O L o a) 0 O p L O c Lp O L a p 0 0 p w p C0•) L m 'a O -E 0(n ° ° a a) m m a) ' a) L m a) a) > '- m > Q a) ° 7 0) a 7 a- Q 7 a' 7 6 cn 7 CY U a) 7 cr a) C 7 Z Q O Q C 0 0 O_ > 0 (> > °w 0� 3 a) 0 E C =_ 0 0 6 ccCi ¢a om[ c[ ccoo cC ccoin °d oa'[ cr �� 3 am om[ -i J U) U Y J � N m rI W O U X W «: n o W � - a 0 d L c J m O n J °= C E oa O 00 _ NO ° W U) Y d m co o (n 0 Q COO Q) Q 1� m n O co cn O d W a mIn 00 N LO (O .- p o N p O O N O O C O °) O N-0 y N (•o M a) = N O O a) °) CY) a Cl) S a 2 N F a •` M U a a a H m m 0 a cc U> F 2 (n H 005 z 0 U Q C N Qa CN N Qa o m `o 0 •a a c 00 '0 c U 0 > O o- y o a N c O c co w .a° o Q c L m c m f- CL " a C c +� c E E w p a o a 0 � @ z a) -0 m o o -0 ti d Q CO Q) N y w o o U Lo N m 1: y 4% cU °) C c0 Q y Q) mU 6 oQ)C00 H U w 0 cr C o 0 0 O O O O a o d D > 006 0 4�0 Lo O a W F- Q F- U) U W 0 m a J Q U W a U) E f0 f0 d0 N y N N O n N N r L p G U p N O 0) la - O n l) 0 « c N O O N O O O 0 eh O E U Q M w o o d •O ao .n 0 m sn vi J N Y O x d 0 a c a o. m c o x o m r c IL E m a a° 0. m W r O Y e O C a '0CL c x = ao A L r r 'o F a r T M a : N 0) w d w ac m D y fC C7 Q W f,7 W w CL O C C C c O m J U) U N U Z LL O a c CD« c ix E E a 007 i • LOU �TQc DEPARTMENT REPORT: 42—R w5 cFy OF 19 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY CIL DODIE HORVITZ, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECT JUNE 19, 2001 TRANSMITTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MAY 2001 UPCOMING EVENTS OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 2001: July 2 *Monthly Putting Contest July 5 *Ballroom/Swing and Latin Dance Lessons July 7 La Quinta Golf Tour, Desert Willow Golf Resort, Fire Cliff July 7 2 on 2 Grass Volleyball Tournament, Adams Park July 10 *Free Blood Pressure, Glucose and Cholesterol Screening July 12 *Free Medical Insurance Counseling July 12 *"Patriots' Day Luncheon" July 13 Excursion to World Famous San Diego Zoo July 14 La Quinta Golf Tour, Westin Mission Hills, Pete Dye Course July 17 *CPR Class July 17 *Free Hearing Consultation July 17 Continuing Yoga, La Quinta High School Dance Room July 18 *Department of Community Action Energy Assistance Clinic July 19 *Healthy Cooking Class July 19 Beginning Yoga, La Quinta High School Dance Room July 19 Fashion Island Shopping Trip, Newport Beach July 21 La Quinta Golf Tour, Sun City, Mountain Vista July 21 Mastering Microsoft Access, La Quinta Boys and Girls Club July 21 Beach Train Excursion, The San Clemente Pier Annual Ocean Festival July 23 How to Really Take Care of your Skin, La Quinta Senior Center July 26 *Excursion to Palm Springs Aerial Tram July 30 Classic/Latin Ballroom Dancing, La Quinta High School Dance Room July 30 Beginning Computers, La Quinta Boys and Girls Club July 30 *AARP Mature Driver's Course July 31 *AARP Mature Driver's Course * Senior Center Program, Class or Event 482 c&t,,, 4 4 0" Community Services Department Attendance Report for the Month of May 2001 Summary Sheet Program 2001 2000 Variance Meetings Per Month 2001 2000 Leisure Classes 137 40 97 171 4 Special Events 71 99 -28 2 1 Adult Sports 456 330 126 11 11 Senior Center 1450 1394 56 88 103 Total 2114 1863 251 118 119 Senior Services Senior Center 485 645 -152 25 16 Total 485 645 -152 251 16 Sports Complex Use LQ Baseball Assoc. 6,500 6000 500 22 22 Total 6,500 6000 500 22 22 Total Programs 1 9,0991 8,5081 599 165 157 Volunteer Hours Senior Center 753 790 -37 Meals on Wheels 681 641 4 Total Volunteer Hours 1 8211 854 -33 Monthly Revenue Senior Center $ 3,027.00 $ 2,939.50 $88 Community Services $ 4,452.00 $ 4,296.00 $ 156.00 Rental Income $ 440.00 $ 673.00 $ 233.00) Total Revenue $ 7,919.00 $ 7,908.50 $11 Revenue Year to Date Senior Center $ 55,982.61 $ 61,213.94 $ 5,231.00 Community Services $ 56,753.85 $ 46,990.00 $ 9,772.00 Rental Income $ 8,521.50 $ 8,080.50 $ 1,161.00 Total Revenue to Date $121,257.96 $ 116,284.44 $ 16,164.00 4g3 002 Community Services Program Report for May 2001 2001 2001 2000 2000 2001 2000 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Meetings Meetings Leisure Classes Beginning Yoga, Th. 7 14 0 0 14 2 0 Beginning Yoga, Tu. 14 28 0 0 28 2 0 Latin Ballroom Dance 13 52 10 40 12 4 4 Tappercize 7 28 0 0 28 4 0 Photo Deluxe 3 15 0 0 15 5 0 Totals 1 441 1371 101 401 971 17 4 2001 2001 2000 2000 2001 2000 Participants ITotal Participation IParticipants Total Participation Variance IMeetings IMeetings Special Events 2 on 2 Grass Volleyball 20 01 0 0 20 1 0 Mexico Excursion 51 51 99 99 -48 1 1 Totals 71 711 99 99 -28 21 1 2001 2001 2000 2000 2001 2000 Participants ITotal Participation IParticipants ITotal Participation IVariance meetings Meetin s Adult Sports Open Basketball M/T 96 961 90 90 6 8 9 Adult Soccer League 120 360 120 240 120 3 2 Totals 216 456 210 330 126 11 11 Recreation Totals 1 3311 6641 3191 4691 1951 30 16 Page 2 484 aoj Senior Center Attendance 2001 2001 2000 2000 e istere otal a istere -Total eetings Participants artier anon Pa Iclpants artici anon Variance 2001 2000 Senior Activities All Valley Choir 67 67 0 0 67 1 0 Bridge, ACBL 220 220 203 203 17 4 5 Bridge, Duplicate/Social 279 279 343 343 -64 10 12 Ice Cream Social 401 40 58 58 -18 6 5 Monthly Birthday Party 29 29 28 28 1 11 1 Monthly Luncheon 84 84 66 66 18 11 1 Movie Time 71 71 70 70 1 10 8 Putting Contest 7 7 6 6 1 1 1 Palm Springs Museum Tour 20 20 0 0 20 1 0 Tennis Social 8 8 9 9 -1 1 1 Senior Activity Total 825 825 783 783 42 36 34 Senior Leisure Courses Ballroom Dance 21 35 6 81 27 41 4 Ceramics 11 48 10 33 15 5 4 Computer 9 8 26 56 -48 2 11 Dog Training Class 7 24 0 0 24 4 0 Exercise 46 374 57 375 -1 12 18 Senior Leisure Courses Total 94 489 99 472 17 27 37 Senior Leisure Classes Computer Tutor 5 5 17 17 -121 51 17 Golden Tones 50 50 68 68 -18 4 6 Quilting 33 33 24 24 9 5 4 Rug Hooking 3 3 0 0 3 1 0 Tai Chi 17 17 0 0 17 5 0 Tap Dance 6 6 30 30 -24 1 5 Woodcarving 22 22 0 0 22 4 0 Senior Leisure Classes Total 136 136 139 139 -3 25 32 TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAMS 1055 1450 1021 1394 56 88 103 Senior Services A.A. R. P. "55 Alive" 50 50 52 52 -2 2 2 Ambassadors 62 62 80 80 -18 n/a n/a Bono's Mobile Office 1 1 2 2 -1 1 1 FIND Food Distribution 270 270 414 414 -144 41 4 Health Screenings 26 26 47 47 -21 2 5 Hearing Consultation 71 7 0 0 7 1 0 I.I.D. Energy Assistance 32 32 0 0 32 8 0 I.I.D. Energy Assistance/No fee 3 3 0 0 3 3 0 Legal Consultation 12 12 26 26 -14 1 2 Medicare Consultation 9 9 20 20 -11 n/a n/a Memory Screening 8 8 0 0 16 1 0 Share Meetings/Sign-up 5 5 4 4 1 2 2 TOTAL SENIOR SERVICES 485 4851 645 645 -152 25 1s SENIOR CENTER TOTAL 15401 19351 1666 2039 -96 113 119 Page 3 485 004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Chris A. Vogt, Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: June 19, 2001 RE: Public Works/Engineering Department Report for the Month of April 2001 Attached please find the following: Summary of Citizen Request reports received; 2. Summary of Graffiti reports received; 3. Plan Check Applications received; 4. Encroachment Permits received; 5. List of Capital Improvement Project status. /,/ W�y 7 Chris A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer S:\pwdept\PW Monthly Report.wpd 486 W W V V Wi m Wi A � OWi M Q ( fW� A A (WT V N N N N z WW pWp�� A A O OWi (OW�i A OWi O O N W N O W W O N 0 W A (WO N A (oT N V V tND m W (O (Nli fold N fNl� (�Zt V 0 V 0 O) 0 O) 0 O) 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 Ut 0 N 0 A 0 A 0 A++ 0 0 0 ++ 0 0 + 0---- O W W -- W (J ------ W N N+ +++ 0- o D m n V1 L` 5n LL d L Vl Lp NL LP N V) Vi0 L D V) N L L� xd�Lx n L 7J 3 L w �0� S0, �= �0 30 333 03 0a 3 L0G1= 300N3-{3H �`- ,n x m w E 3�3 3 w 3�3> 3M 'm H 013 s oMp 3 a c_ 3 3 3 Z O N c_ O c_ O c O N O O N N N p�j N N N N N y N N N y N N N N j y w m 0C10 0 W >nOo M. M � r o 'M j J 0 j jpG O v xro 0O xz 0 0 ' NJ p —oo OAm r p3OD p d 0 m O m � O O n O O y 2 M O aO 0 O O —I» N O Q — A Jy N w J N O OCN0N N 7 N u 1 3 p cn y m co C. N o w Z m m o0 -i Si m co A 3 N m £ m o 0 m p O N t0 F J N W C y -i O< mmmaymaJc0Jpobi, w 3, = a N9 owy =JFoJFO_J yJF-JFo.�J O y`G D OQ O NNOliJw Nm NS9. (o¢n Fcn0 3 N W J w c �w 3p 0 o F y J wx b 0» w w ' o y dy lor N < 0 N _J 3 ^ O N Jm 3SJmJCy.y0mN. icR Nw 9, o N J. O w 9OxnxS N 0 NN N$ J opx Y oJ g ^�n o y o3 OO m63 m Z o O N r_.cpn fJ= 3 O NC y C_ I y -p w J y N poDyewdl Or O+j N oN j j COc3 mp T, E.c moEos3 69�A3fm rfoOcJNwD . 0 m`swyO yaOmKwC) m 3� 03O 6, o? oo �pm3 O w3 °¢y Jmo3'mJco w O Lmp 3p w 3 ww yW. 3 Ei L LE-opmo ^ ew D0 ca w w m' £ w < 33 o ¢ 3 3 w 2 ;o x 0 9 K 9 K 0 3 9 3 3 3 9 3 3 3 3 K 3 3 0 3 0 3 90� 3� 00 c ry w `J~' W 000 W W N 4a 0000 W W W 0 w 00000 W W W w 00 w W 00303 N W H w �O w W 000000000 W W W W W W W Ge V 3 w 3 w w w N N J J N M N N = + + + + = N + + W �� U W� W+O+Nse O O t0O 0 0 V 0 N 0 V 0 (TNN 0 0 0 V 0 UiN 0 0 C1AN 0 0 LJ� 0 O)O�Oi 0 0 0 0 O o O O O O p 0 0 0 O 0 0 m c �0000 �O O O m 000 -�-i m 0000 ��90 m 00000 �-i��� 00 �-� m-���-� m� 000000�00 ��-i�1—im�� z _ x x = _ = _ _ = x x _ = x x x = = V xmmmm x x = _ =m 2 x mmmmmmxmm = _ = x x _ = D 5 m A mmm x,�,Zl Z mmmm A A A 7.1 Z mmmmm AAA M;o mm AA Z x AAA Z p AAAA x A 0 A A o Z m m m m m m 487 002 N N N U� N N N N N A N A N W N w N Cl W O O O O O O O O O O cn fA lD N f0 � J J 3 J N S y N N N pF < co O O O a0i D r p n g n g o o w E. 3 N N N p J S J = 0 (' ROE a a fT a a d j m my d 0y Q d W m x� �0NN y d J u C F 7• J 0 J. F @ A d j't0 o ^ _Sl A d. = D m m a 3 v a F Qo ^< m� O y �} O O O y d d N d N d co � 3 7 y J N N J N x 0 d M 0 3 nP N J N O a1 3 O^ ? d j d N O O N j ET <J d N O j J d 2= 2 O W J" O J C N 0 3 J d _d N 7 7 O f O O^ Om dJ nJ Z^^o J£ fD y On Z fD d 0 3 O N y 3 D d d d Q d C d A d S C 2. 9 0 0 03 0 O 0 00 0 d J N (NO O 00 O) O W N CO 0 o O o o O O o 0 0 m m 0 0 m00 O 0 00 m 22 v x x x x m m ! 489 1� 489 004 § \ k \\\\ 3\ B S( q 000 G» G ;°!� oa § )§7((: 0 o z z § $c z ; 3 / < ) ( ) ()\ \ \ 2 rg zo\( ) \ \ § ) \ \0 ) ) \ §\§| - ° \ } \ \ \ +K` G z / z k m-i { / Cl) §§ (4 0 ( k k k \ (ca OD �000000ox o:@E@m@mr KOO «E) ;q; zW,=zm /§)\{°)°/ Z:\zzz \�®`\/, m }(\ ( m (0> ) \ \�f \ ) m / ) mk! \ § \ § § > § § / / j \ m / \ \ k;)m2;3! ;- ,__ 7f0 OX§ „:: FAk 220z /§!§®§`o ��m FA »#`f q �[2 2<! 22--i K +K �q®! ; !eE ! }74�% } \k>r `! 0 0> v| r 3 k -_ ( / z 0! d 2 $ \} ( )}� / );i ( § / Q. { 2m0 4qn 005 0 0 0 0 0 o a o & 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - - � - — � O � — m A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A tJ� A A A 4� A z O W V N A W N O t0 O V N N O) V m N W N t0 L O m O U ry N m 7J W o J s m D o mmw 30 n y nC nno CO a n 0 Q O z m 3 < 0 ^ n y J n V o N J j j O O J N N � N 2 S C < p L ? °p < m W G A m N = m < N� (�� a y y cri ((03�� yo < 0 OJ OpO_ x (O 3 3 O m, dcy O ry C N J a0 O J p O o O o J ,coy o J O J N J �n N N N — = N m n c y J m O a O N0 G OA N O n c T .O. O d0 f. 0 a m 6 as � oJi ° cJ� m cn °—' ' w n ,d s o -- a O F d J d d m a o 3 V o Z dm J — y C FA y fA fA W N M fA Hi fA W (!! fA EA � fA O ml m z N N N N N N d N N d N m N N N N y w N 0 d m o O 3 3 3 o O o 3 o O o 3 3 30 O O o 3 (3p m z n z O n 2 m m z 1 m m ic 3 N s 0 0 491 !?il6 O (NO tN0 cNp A O O (OJJ ..ff A tO A (O A A pA A W N O O y c � � N s 3 c �. 0 O p - _ y N d m N G) 2 S N (p J Z O 0 O O Dp < m x m m 3 n n nN N J Sc O � N J N p N � O d a. U] d Law N b � 6 0 p N N n O 'v c � c o J m N 0 (D 3 d O (((Ayyy 0 O J O O O V O OD V O W O lND N O A O O O O N O a Doi N d 3 = C C C y Q 49, N 1 C/P STATUS UPDATE Work is continuing on Jefferson Street from Highway 1 1 1 to Avenue 54. The Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) and the City have approved the Water Pumping Station Relocation plans during the week of April 9, 2001. CVWD has conditioned the relocation of the existing water pumping station located on the northeast corner of Jefferson Street and Ave. 48 (City of Indio) as opposed to modifying the existing pumping facility. Since this is located within the City of Indio, the cost of this relocation will be borne by the City of Indio and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG). A Change Order will be presented to the City Council for consideration to delete the pump station from the Jefferson Street contract. Indio and CVWD have come to an agreement on the extent of the relocation. Public Works Staff will discuss turning the lead over to Indio to complete the Pump Station since the project is within the City Limits of Indio. Granite construction was projecting the completion of Jefferson Street for early May 2001. CVWD has requested the replacement of the sewer line across the All American Canal with a stainless steel pipe as opposed to the previous cast iron pipe. This is to further protect the sewer line from future failures. Granite Construction's latest estimate for project completion is late June 2001. Notice to Proceed was issued for work to begin on October 4, 2000 for Areas A & B. Avenida Mendoza has been closed south of Avenida Montezuma and north of the alley that extends behind the museum. Only one course of pavement was placed on this section of Ave. Navarro. This is to allow drainage water to continue north to Ave. Montezuma. Bollards will be placed on Ave. Navarro at Ave. Montezuma and the alley south of Ave. Montezuma as part of this project. Base paving has been completed on all streets. CVWD has agreed to install a water line in Calle Amigo if the RDA will pay for the trench restorations. Staff is pursuing a cost estimate from Granite Construction. It is anticipated that Granite will request extra days to complete this work. 493 008 The roundabout in the Village (Montezuma and Navarro) has been installed. After the roundabout was constructed flush with the pavement to allow trucks from the post office to drive through the intersection, it has become apparent that motorists are driving straight through the roundabout. Staff is working on concepts to ensure that the roundabout channels vehicles properly while still providing clearance for truck traffic. The Contractor and the Construction Manager have been working with the area utilities to ensure the work within the Westward Ho area is completed quickly with the least impact to the residents of the area. The Construction Manager and City staff have been working with the residents on issues including the curb type and driveway replacements. The anticipated completion date is July 9, 2001. Area D is complete except for a number of "punchlist" items still outstanding. These items will be completed prior to final acceptance by the City. The mini park is planned behind the proposed sound wall at Saguaro, Sagebrush, and Bottlebrush. This project was awarded to Ray Lopez Associates during the May 1, 2001 City Council meeting. There has been a delay in the completion of this project. The sign manufacturer that was working as a sub -consultant to the General Contractor has filed for bankruptcy. The General Contractor is working with City staff to resolve the issue and complete the project. This project is complete. The City is presently part of a three-way contract with Spanos and Stamko for the construction of the median on Adams Street from Avenue 47 to Avenue 48. Construction has commenced during the week of December 4, 2000 and is being completed by contractors under the direction of Stamko. City staff is overseeing the project to ensure compliance with the Agreement. 494 C3:'?9 Design, plans, and specifications are 95% complete. The final connection of a water line feed to supply the proposed lake with water from the All American Canal must be designed and approved by CVWD. CVWD has approved the conceptual plan and has also completed final comments for the approval of the irrigation system. Upon completion of the canal water connection and signature of approval by CVWD, City staff will advertise the Civic Center Campus for bid. The City Council approved plans and authorized advertisement for bid on December 19, 2000. The Design Engineer and representatives of CVWD have indicated that canal water has an unusually high concentration of silt. The bid will include silt traps, and an alternate bid of a potable water feed to ensure that the project will be built to function properly. The City's consultant, TKD, originally proposed utilization of canal water for the Civic Center Campus Lake to CVWD on October 10, 2000. Approval was received for this concept by CVWD on December 27, 2000. CVWD informed the City's consultant that it would take a few months in order to complete a water service agreement for the canal water. Plans for providing canal water to the Civic Center Campus Lake were first submitted to CVWD during the last week of April 2001. There have been two series of plan check reviews, and TKD has informed staff they anticipate receiving signed plans from CVWD by the end of June 2001. In order to obtain competitive bids, a one month bidding period will be advertised at the beginning of July 2001, with bid opening in August 2001. Barring any unforseen circumstances, construction should commence in September of 2001. The project is specified as a 180 day project, with an anticipated completion date of March 2002. On December 5, 2000, the City Council awarded a design contract to The Keith Companies (TKC) to design various sidewalk and street improvements throughout the City. These include a low water crossing at Avenue 50, sidewalk along the west side of Washington Street from Avenida La Fonda to Avenue 52, sidewalk along the north side of Sagebrush Drive, paved sidewalk from Saguaro to Avenue 50 on the east side of Washington Street, paved sidewalk on the north side of Avenue 50 from Washington Street to connect to the existing sidewalk fronting the Sports Complex, and sidewalk and street improvements along Westward Ho and Dune Palms Road in conjunction with an SB 821 grant. The City has received a grant to construct bicycle lanes on Calle Tampico, Park Ave., and Ave. 50. An Amendment has been negotiated with the Keith Companies to design the bicycle lanes as part of the sidewalk project. This will provide a construction cost savings as well as a time savings to both projects. The plans, specifications, and engineer's estimates will be presented to the City Council for approval and 495 f10 authorization to bid during the June 19, 2001 Council meeting. Recently, the Tradition Development contacted the City regarding construction of a wall from Avenida La Fonda to Avenue 52 on the west side of Washington Street. City staff is presently working with representatives of the Tradition in order to complete an MOU for shared costs. This wall is identified in the Developer Impact Fee as a sound wall. TKC is completing the design for the Tradition and will coordinate their design efforts with their design of the sidewalk project from Avenida La Fonda to Avenue 52. The City Council approved this concept on December 19, 2000 and authorized the City Manager to enter into the MOU contingent upon the City Attorney's approval as to the form. When the City Council initially approved this concept, representatives of the Tradition were proposing to take the lead. Since that time, the Tradition has requested that the City take the lead. A new MOU was proposed during the May 15, 2001 City Council meeting with the City as the lead. This work will be completed as part of the citywide sidewalk project that is planned for the west side of Washington Street between Ave. La Fonda and Ave. 52. The recommendation to award the construction contract will be made during the June 19, 2001 City Council meeting, with the construction commencing in July 2001. Barring any unforeseen conditions, this project should be completed by October or November 2001, depending on delivery time of the signal poles and controller cabinets. During the April 3, 2001 Council meeting, the City Council awarded the design project to Harris and Associates. The Consultant will complete new sound studies and three conceptual designs for City Manager and staff review and approval. Per the City Council's direction, a design concept will be chosen by the City Manager and staff based on noise attenuation requirements and aesthetics. This one concept will be brought forward to the City Council for final approval prior to proceeding. On June 8, 2001, Harris and Associates received the sound study by Gordon Bricken Associates. Harris Associates will analyze the study and incorporate it into the design. Concepts are scheduled to be completed by the end of June 2001. 496 Citywide mini park expansion projects include the Eisenhower Park expansion, the new cove mini park, and the mini park between Bottlebrush and Sagebrush. The expansion of Eisenhower Park is identified in the Fiscal Year 1997/1998 CIP. An amount of $160,000 was appropriated for this project. The Cove Mini Park and the Pocket Park at Bottlebrush/Saguaro/Sagebrush are each identified as projects in the 2000/2001 CIP. The Cove Mini Park allocates $140,720, and the Bottlebrush/Saguaro/Sagebrush Pocket Park appropriates $40,000. The total budget available for these parks combined is $340,720. A contract consultant was selected and the City Council awarded the design/build contract to Ray Lopez Associates during the May 1, 2001 City Council meeting. The design is now underway. The consultant has indicated that his preliminary schedule is to complete the parks by December 2001. However, a final schedule has not been submitted and approved by City staff. The City Council approved a contract with Peter Urbon on October 3, 2000. It is anticipated that Mr. Urbon will provide the obelisks to the City for installation by June 2001. During the April 3, 2001 City Council meeting, the Council approved an Amendment to change the material and style of lettering on the obelisks. The artist is proceeding with the construction of the obelisks. City staff has completed the final draft of the D.B.E. Program and has incorporated comments by the State. The City may not proceed with Federally -funded grants such as the Hazard Elimination System Grant (HES) for widening Avenue 52, and any PM- 10 work until the City receives approval of the new D.B.E. Program. This is a Federal requirement that went into effect in October 2000. City staff met with representatives from Indio, CVAG, and RBF to discuss the proposal for the final design of the Jefferson Street Project from Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard. STIP Funding and Measure A Funding were discussed. RBF will complete a feasibility study to determine whether a bridge should be constructed over the Whitewater Channel and if Jefferson Street, from Westward Ho to the Channel, should be constructed as a four lane or six lane facility. RBF will complete the Project Study Report (PSR) and the EIS for the project. Since STIP Funding will be utilized (Federal funding), the EIR under the CEQA provisions is no longer applied. The environmental provisions must now comply with National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). The Cities of La Quinta and Indio, the County of Riverside, and CVAG are presently reviewing RBF's proposal prior to proceeding. Funding for the City's portion of this work has been identified in the CIP for the year 2000/2001. This funding did not take into account a bridge over the Whitewater Channel. The feasibility study that will be completed by RBF will address a bridge over the Whitewater Channel. CVAG has money identified in the Measure A program and has been discussing utilizing State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funds for this project. The County of Riverside and the City of Indio are also participating; however, the status of their funding is unknown. The City of La Quinta was successful in an RCTC Call for Projects for STIP Discretionary funding for the Jefferson Street Bridge. The City was awarded $963,000 to be utilized as part of the City's 25% share for the bridge. Discussions are now taking place to determine which agency will act as lead on the project. A greater geographic proportion of the project is within Indio's boundaries. The design plans are being completed by David Evans and Associates (DEA) and are approximately 95% complete. City Council has approved the landscaping for the roundabout and the landscaping pallet for the median. City Council also approved removing the landscaping in front of the Citrus and replacing it with the City pallet as part of this project. City staff is working with representatives of the City of Indio to develop an MOU for shared costs for construction and maintenance of the median islands. It is anticipated that the plans, specifications, and engineer's estimate will be brought forward to the City Council for approval and authorization to bid after the completion of the Jefferson Street Project. This project is identified in the City's CIP for Fiscal Year 2000/2001 . An amount of $167,655 has been appropriated under RDA Project Area #1 for these improvements. This project includes the restoration of the lighting system for the southern four courts, installation of dasher boards for roller hockey, and the potential conversion of one court to a basketball court. City staff will not proceed until the Phase I Improvements for the Fritz Burns Park are complete. A recommendation will be presented to the City Council for their consideration, during their June 19, 2001 council meeting, to accept the Phase I improvements of the Fritz Burns Park as 100% complete. It is anticipated that an RFP will be developed for the design, plans, specifications, and engineer's estimate in July 2001. (' 13 The Community Services Commission reviewed three concepts for the park at their regularly scheduled meeting on December 11, 2000. After review, modifications were suggested. The consultant, Steve Lang of Purkiss Rose-RSI revised the plan and presented the project to the City Council during the January 2, 2001 City Council Study Session. City Council made a number of comments during the January 2, 2001 Study Session. Those comments have been incorporated into a Phase Plan that was presented to the City Council on February 6, 2001. The budgeted amount for this project is $2,000,000. The City of La Quinta has received $500,000 of Proposition 12 funds that may be applied to this project, thereby bringing the construction budget to $2.5 million. The City Council approved the Master Plan for the park during the April 3, 2001 City Council meeting. Please note that the project time line is tentative dependent upon approvals as necessary with each task. The Professional Services Agreement was executed, and the review of the project has begun. It is anticipated that the Construction Documents will be ready for review by the Planning Commission by mid to late -July 2001. The final plans for the Community Park are anticipated to be ready for City Council consideration in late -October 2001. It is anticipated that once the construction documents are approved by the City Council, the bidding process will take approximately 6 weeks with the proposed award by the second meeting in December 2001. From the award of contract, it is anticipated that the construction period for the park will be 180 days. If construction begins by the middle of January 2002, the completion of the project is anticipated in July 2002. On October 30 and 31, 2000, the Museum Expansion Consultant Selection Committee interviewed five firms that specialize in historical building expansions. Staff has met with Paul Johnson of Ferris, Johnson & Perkins to discuss the design concept contract. It is anticipated that the Redevelopment Agency Board will review the final concepts at the August 21, 2001 meeting. Funding for the construction of the museum expansion is contained in the Fiscal Year 2003/04 Capital Improvement Program with a construction amount of $618,000. 491 '1114 POLICE REPORT Inside this issue May Significant Activity Report School Resource Officer Reports for May April Crime Statistics Summary Target Team Report for May Rotor Officer Statistics for May Explorer Program Report for May Traffic Officer Statistics Report for May Volume 1, Issue 6, Indio Station Traffic Report Special points of interest from the Crime Statistic Summary: • YTD statistics for felorry sex crimes indicates a significant reduction (7S90 in occur- rences. • The rate of occurrence for burglaries has started to taper off, but it is still significantly higher than last year's rate. • Vandalism has shown a large decrease when compared to the YTD 2000 level. • The number of traffic cita- tions has almost doubled and both injury and non -injury traffic collisions have de- creased. APR 2001—MAY 2001 DEPARTMENT REPORT N0. 9-1A Target Team Change Scheduled for July Starting on July 12, the La Quinta Target Team will welcome a new member. You may recognize the new member since he has been a patrol officer in the La Quinta area for the past 5 years. Deputy Eric Speir will team up with Deputy Aaron Eller to target specific problems occurring in La Quinta. Deputy Speir has been with the Sheriffs Department for 11 years and has had several assignments includ- ing Corrections and Patrol. In addition to his patrol duties, Deputy Speir is a Rangemaster at the Indio Station and a member of the Sheriffs Pistol Team. As a Pistol Team member, he has won numerous awards at the Police Olympics and other national competitions. Deputy Speir is certified for Bicycle Patrol duties and is looking forward to working with the City of La Quinta staff. With his prior patrol experience in La Quinta, Deputy Speir has consider- able knowledge of the community, it's citizens, and those problems that need to be solved. Deputy Speir will be replacing Deputy Price, who is returning to patrol after being a target team member for 4 years. The City of La Quinta will continue to benefit from Deputy Price's experience, training, and knowledge, since it is anticipated that he will be working patrol assignments in La Quinta. School Resource Officers Attend Special Training The school resource officers assigned to schools serving the City of La Quinta, along with SROs from schools throughout the Coachella Val- ley, attended a special train- ing session this month. The "Active Shooter Training" session was presented by the Riverside County Sheriffs Department Emergency Services Team (SWAT). The one -day session involved presentations reference how to deal with on -campus situations involving gunmen and shootings. The training provided the SROs with options and tactics that they could use to end the situation in a more rapid manner and therefore reduce the potential danger to students and school staff. In additionell *4111111130v" to the classroom portion of the training, the SROs participated in "live fire" weapons train- ing that incorporated An"o 4 id the tactics they learned Searles A IS in the classroom SMIAM 19:5917,7.9E session. I vww` 500 City of La Quinta La Quinta Police Department Captain Darla Singerton, Commanding May 1001 Highlights (Numbers in parenthesis denotes number of calls for service that day) Tuesday, 05-01-01 (37): Carl Rasmussen, 45, La Quinta, arrested for spousal battery. Jesse Jasso, 35, La Quinta, arrested for spousal abuse warrant following ped. check. Mary Durham, 27, La Quinta, arrested for possession of narcotics following vehicle stop. Wednesday, 05-02-01(45): Injury collision on Tampico and Washington. Motorcycle driven by Royal Cherry, 60, San Clemente, failed to yield right of way and turned in front of oncoming Buick driven by La Quinta resident, Irene Garza, 53. Garza was not injured. Cherry had major, but not life threatening, injuries to back, neck, arm and leg. He was transported to Desert Hospital. Thursday, 05-03-01 (55): Arrested Eugenia Mitchell age 40 for spousal abuse from the 53000 block of Ave. Rubio La Quinta. Attested Juvenile age 14 from La Q.M.S. for battery. Friday, 05-04-01(72): Attested Anthony Caswell age 20 of Palm Desert for burglary from the Wal-Mart store La Quinta. Saturday, 05-05-01 (42): LAR01125040 Arrested Waymon Hogan age 25 of Palm Desert for Felony Warrant from an Unk. location. Sunday, 05-06-01(47): Alejandro Renturia, 24, La Quinta, arrested for public intoxication. John Perez Salas, 53, arrested for warrant and public intoxication. Patrick Hamilton, 34, Palm Desert, arrested for two misdemeanor warrants. Monday, 05-07-01(39): No significant activity 5011 Tuesday. 05-08-01 (39): 1st grader at Truman elementary brought key chain sized pepper spray to school. Was found by bus driver. Wednesday, 05-09-01(54): Arrested Elijah Butler age 19 of La Quinta for driving under the influence of alcohol from an unk. location. Arrested two juveniles 10th grade for battery on school grounds from La Quinta High School. Thursday. 05-10-01 (39): Arrested a Juvenile age 16 of Indio for under the influence of a controlled substance and poss. of paraphenalia from Ensenada and Eisenhower, La Quinta. Friday, 05-11-01 (76): Arrested a juvenile age 17 of Indio for poss. of a stolen vehicle from an unk. location. Saturday,05-12-01 (46): Arrested Eugenia Mitchella age 40 of La Quinta for battery on spouse from the 53000 block of Ave. Velasco La Quinta. Sunday, 05-13-01 (41): No significant activity Monday. 05-14-01 (38): Jesse Valenzuela, 27, Indio, is being sought for kidnapping and car jacking after he accosted ex-wife in parking lot at Tampico and Desert Club. Valenzuela is on parole for terrorist threats against same victim. Vehicle was spotted a short time later and driver fled on foot. Victim was not injured. Tuesday. 05-15-01(35): Douglas Jones, 49, La Quinta, arrested for public intoxication. Wednesday, 05-16-01 (36): None Thursday. 05-17-01 (54): Arrested a juvenile for battery on school grounds and lewd or obscene conduct from the 73000 block of Gold Flower Palm Desert. 502 Friday, 05-18-01(62): Arrested Gregory Little age unk. for poss. of other than fixed ammunition from Fred Waring Dr. and Washington St. La Quinta. Arrested Zasha Hurst age 23 of La Quinta for poss. of a controlled substance warrant from the 52000 block of Ave. Villa La Quinta. Arrested Kevin Hall age 34 of La Quinta for spousal abuse from the 54000 block of Ave. Alvarado La Quinta. Saturday, 05-19-01(61): None Sunday. 05-20-01(49): On May 19, 2001, at approximately 2307 hours, Officers of the La Quints Police Department were notified of a major traffic accident, with injuries, at the above location. Upon arrival at the scene, Officers found a single vehicle involved with one occupant in the vehicle. Preliminary investigation has revealed that the vehicle, a white 1997 Lexus, driven by a "Tina Louise Kahan" (A 32 year old La Quinta resident), had been travelling southbound on PGA Blvd., south of Avenue 54, at an undetermined speed, when she lost control of the vehicle. The vehicle skidded in a southeasterly direction, struck the concrete curb of the center divider, traveled up on the center divider where it struck a large palm tree. The impact with the palm tree caused the vehicle to shear in half. The vehicle continued skidding in a southeasterly direction and came to final rest in the north bound lanes of PGA Blvd. The driver (Kahan) and sole occupant of the vehicle suffered major head injuries and had to be transported to Desert Hospital by CHP Helicopter. At this time she is listed in critical condition. The exact cause of the collision is unknown at this time. PGA Blvd. (North and south bound) had to be closed for several hours while Officers conducted their investigation. Mary Mcrumb, 37, La Quinta, arrested for felony spousal abuse and with deadly weapon. Victim Foster Kirby was stabbed in arm, back and hand. Long time ongoing disturbances at the residence. CPS responded for nine children in residence. Monday, 05-21-01 (48): Several reports of stolen golf clubs from open garages in PGA West as well as stolen vehicles. Tuesday, 05-22-01 (36): Ronald Reynolds, 34, arrested for spousal abuse and possession of methamphetamine. Wednesday, 05-23-01(61): No significant activity 503 Thursday, 05-24-01 (44): None Friday, 05-25-01(43): Arrested Mario Valenzuela age 23 of La Quinta for burglary, robbery, and terrorist threats from an unk. Location. Based on follow up info. Arrested David Espinoza JR. age 23 of La Quints for poss. of a controlled substance from Dune Palms and westward Ho Dr. La Quinta. Arrested Ramon Vivanleva JR. age 19 of Indio for violation of court order from the 46000 block of Dune Palms Rd. La Quinta. Saturday,05-26-01 (56): Troy Schow, 28, Indio, arrested for DUI. Sammy Mizell, 30, arrested four spousal battery and attempted arson when he attempted to set fire to estranged wife's car. Two additional thefts and auto theft from PGA West between 2100 and 0600 Friday/Saturday. Both on Inverness, cart taken was later recovered within country club. Daneil Antonov, 28, Palm Desert, arrested for DUI during checkpoint at I I I and Simon. Sunday, 05-27-01 (36): No significant activity Monday, 05-28-01(42): No significant activity Tuesday, 05-29-01(47): Second incidence of mail box thefts. This time at Starlight Dunes, just east of past date's thefts at Bella Vista. Suspect(s) are breaking into multiple use mail boxes at end of streets. Horace Wood, 53, Indio, arrested for DUI. Clement Henry, 25, Palm Desert, arrested for burglary, concealed weapon and possession of stolen property. Wednesday, 05-30-01(49): Margarito Garcia, 28, Indio, arrested for under the influence of narcotics and felony possession of narcotics warrant following pedestrian check. Salari Jackson, 25, Palm Desert, was involved in fight with unknown subject while playing basketball at Boys and Girls Club. He suffered broken jaw. He refused to name or identify suspect. Minor injury collision on 52 and Washington. Mary Mejia, 21, transported, treated and released from JFK. 504 Thursday, 05-31-01 (40): Arrested James Breeden age 57 of La Quints for dri6ing under the influence from private Property traffic collision unk. location. Total calls for service: 1476 5©5 CITY of LA QUINTA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT May 2001* SCHOOL: LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL Deputy: Randall Wedertz City Contract Position HIGHLIGHTS: During this reporting period, I took three reports for fighting on campus. In these incidents two students were booked into Juvenile Hall for fighting. I also took one report for vandalism occurring in the student parking lot. I also attended the "Active Shooter" course put on by the Sheriffs Emergency Services Team, along with other SRO's. During this period I detained five juveniles for truancy, all five were issued citations for truancy. I conducted one class presentation with the Public Service Academy on search and seizure. I also conducted an investigation into possible gang activity occurring on campus. Several students on campus formed a group called "BPS" Brown Pride Surenos. This group is mostly freshman and sophomore students, with the leader of the group recently being expelled. Their activity has dropped considerably since his expulsion. Actual reporting period covers April 23, 2001 through May 28, 2001 506 CITY of LA QUINTA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT May 2001 * SCHOOL: LA QUINTA MIDDLE SCHOOL Deputy: Stephen Morton RSO Grant Funded Position HIGHLIGHTS: • I attended a training session with E.S.T. / SWAT. The training provided SRO's with a working knowledge of how to respond to an active shooter on a school campus. • I investigated several fights on campus. Two students were transported to Indio Juvenile Hall for separate incidents. Two reports were submitted to the District Attorney's office. • I conducted several truancy checks in the La Quinta area and three juveniles were issued citations. • I conducted an investigation of a student who threatened another student with a wooden ruler, shaped to resemble a knife. The incident was referred to the District Attorney's office. • I conducted an investigation where a student threatened another student. The incident was unfounded and documented. • I investigated an incident where a student commented on committing suicide. The student was in possession of sleeping pills. The student was transported to the Indio Mental Health Facility for a 72-hour observation. • I received a report from Truman Elementary School that a student was in possession of a tear -gas canister on the school bus. I interviewed the student, a first grader, and his parents. A report was taken, documenting the incident. 507 La Quinta Middle School SRO Report Page 2 • I assisted the Assistant Principal with several student discipline counseling sessions. Actual reporting period covers April 23, 2001 through May 18, 2001. SROs attend patrol briefings, participate in investigations with juvenile suspects, and attend the numerous school -related committee meetings. Their knowledge of student activities is invaluable to police efforts in juvenile crime prevention and apprehension. 508 MOTORCYCLE OFFICER STATISTICS May 2001* Days worked: 10 (3 days were half -days due to unit service) Total citations: 52 Speeding: 39 Red light: 5 Radar: 35 Turning: 2 Pace: 4 Stop sign: 0 Mechanical: 4 High speeds: 25 mph- 57 mph (Ave. 50 x Park) 35 mph -none 45 mph- 67 mph (Eisenhower x San Vicente) 50 mph- 95 mph (washington x Via Sevilla) Avg. speed over the speed limit: 18 mph Avg. citations per day: 5 Associated vehicle code violations: Suspended/Unlic. Drivers: 8 Seatbelt: 0 No insurance: 5 Turning : 0 Mechanical: 0 Drugs/ Alcohol: 0 Seatbelt: 0 City citations: 2 Stored vehicles: 4 T/C's: 8 "This summary does not reflect an exact number of reports handled by the Officer. For example, where a citation or report was written with multiple violations on the same citation, these additional violations are not reflected in this summary. It is a summary of number of citations issued and offenses for which the violator was stopped. 509 Riverside County Sheriffs Department La Quinta Target Team Monthly Report May 2001 Deputy Edward Price and Deputy Aaron Eller The following is a summary of the Target Team activities for the month of May. *********************************************************************** Ongoing Investigations 6 Arrests/ Filings 2 Vehicle checks 16 Business Contacts 5 Investigation assists 2 Arrest Warrants Served 3 Arrest Warrants Attempted 14 Programs 2 Pedestrian Checks 7 Crime Prevention Hours 0 Bar Checks 2 Back-ups 10 Follow-ups 18 Search Warrants 0 Probation Searches 1 Parole Searches 0 Meetings 3 510 La Quinta Target Team Report Page 2 Recovered Stolen Property $0.00 Citations issued 1 Surveillances 4 Property Checks 3 Civil Commitments 0 Bicycle Time 8 Training Hours 16 Illegal Drugs Seized .5 grams heroin Total Mileage: 675 miles Arrests/ Criminal Filings • An Indio resident was arrested for possession of a stolen vehicle. A La Quinta resident was arrested for 3 arrest warrants and for possession of heroin on a traffic stop. Noteworthy Accomplishments; • The Target Team continued with the golf club theft investigation by assisting Palm Desert investigations with follow-up on several burglaries occurring in their jurisdiction. • The Target Team attended a 2-day Cal -Gang training course and are now able to access and make entries into the statewide Cal -Gang system. This system will be useful in investigating gang related crimes and help in gathering gang intelligence. • The Target Team met with Capt. Singerton in reference to updating the gang files and received approval to move forward on gang documentation. • The Target Team is conducting extra patrol in the parks reference violations of city ordinances related to the parks; e.g., drinking and barbequing. • The Target Team along with R.A.I.D. are currently working together in order to identify and arrest the persons involved in numerous vehicle thefts in La Quinta. 511 Riverside County Sheriffs Department EXPLORER POST 503 PROGRAM REPORT May 2001 HIGHLIGHTS: Training meetings were held on May 1, 8, 15, and 22 from 1630-1830 hours. The training meetings covered the following topics: 1) Formation training 2) D.U.I. stops and field coordination test lecture and practice 3) Secret Service overview and duties and 4) Counterfeit money film. Deputy Hughes instructed the formation training. Senior Deputy Gerrard taught about D.U.I. stops and field coordination tests. Secret Service Agent Oneal presented the Secret Service overview, duties, and showed the counterfeit money film. Deputy Bautista and S.S.O. Santillanes supervised the Explorers on the May 12 Six Flags Magic Mountain outing. Explorer Juan Viramontes applied to be a Riverside County Sheriffs Dept. Correctional Deputy. Juan Viramontes passed the Riverside County Sheriffs Dept. Correctional Deputy written examination. Explorer Sergeant Andy Martinez has applied to be a Riverside County Sheriffs Dept. Community Services Officer. Investigator Frank Andrews is still working on Andy Martinez's background investigation. Submitted by Explorer Post Advisor Senior Deputy Andy Gerrard 519 �� �� � p», � ��� CITY OF LA QUINTA APRIL CRIME COMPARISONS CRIME APRIL 2001 APRIL. 2000 YTD (01) YTD (00) *HOMICIDE 0 0 1 0 *RAPE 2 2 5 8 SEX CRIMES (FEL) 0 1 0 3 SEX CRIMES (MISD) 0 4 3 9 ROBBERY 0 0 2 4 ASSAULT (FEL) 13 6 34 34 ASSAULT (MISD) 12 19 69 63 BURGLARY 43 24 194 125 *VEHICLE THEFT 7 9 28 27 *THEFT (FEL) 22 23 87 75 THEFT (MISD) 39 52 145 151 VANDALISM (MISD) 27 30 100 121 DOM. VIOLENCE 10 13 52 44 NARCOTICS 13 6 46 30 DUI 11 5 33 24 T/C. NON -INJURY 43 46 177 183 T/C INJURY 6 5 16 21 T/C FATAL, 0 0 2 2 IWAFFIC CITATIONS 1 354 186 1383 769 * STATISTICS INCLUDE ATTEMPTS 514 N W -P C� O O O O O O p N � I O O W CD: w N N W o ■ N N © a 0 j r C z J D 4 0 0 r ct) 0 ppp m V M N D m z J 1 515 � —k N N O O O O O O w rn 516 V A 0 41 e k W N m W �yl I m 0 g�g^^ 4m 0 z m 'm T 0 0 z D 0 m D m z 517 —.X —.V N N O CS1 O U7 Co U i N O m O m chi cNi 0 0 0 O O iN) W ' O O N N I 518 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z _1 519 Q z 0 z v r N � N W � Cn d� �i N (O 590 O O O O O n D 55 z CD n z O z z C- c `z c D D r W W I O 591 CITY OF LA QUINTA DISPATCH INFORMATION / APRIL, 2001 TYPE OF CALL RESPONSE. TIME (MINUTES) NUMBER OF INCIDENTS ROUTINE 8.3 1233 EMERGENCY 7 7 5?? Bulletins are provided to provide training traffic enforcementdepartment procedures and accident investigation. /f Additionally bulletins will provide Craning about department policy, legal issues, and law updates. IJ//��f���t����� 7^/s/ 40300.5 CVC; Arrest Without Warrant As we all know. a peace officer must witness a criminal act to effect a misdemeanor arrest. There are some exceptions to this rule, one is covered under 40300.5 CVC. When an officer responds to the scene of a traffic collision involving a DUI and did not witness the collision, he/she tin make an arrest on the violator. This is based upon reasonable muse to believe the suspect was driving the vehicle under the influ- ence at the time of the collision. The arrest is authorized for offenses occurring both on and off a highway since driving under the influence (23152 CVC) is a violation on public or private property, when any of the following exists: A) The person is involved in a traffic accident. B) The person is observed in or about a vehicle that is ob- strutting a roadway. C) The person will not be appre- hended unless immediately arrested. D) The person may Cause injury to himself or herself or damage property unless immediately arrested. E) The person may destroy or conceal evidence of the crime unless immediately arrested. The vehicle code allows us to tow off of public or pri- vate property. The most common one is 22651(o)(1) CVC, expired vehicle registration in excess of 6 months. It relates to highways as well as an off-street park- ing facility. Off-street parking refers to any off-street facility held open for use by the public for parking vehicles and in - dudes any publicly owned facili- ties for off. street parking, and privately owned facilities for off-street parking where no fee is charged for the privilege to park and which are held open for the common public use of Courts are required to inter- pret section 40300.6 CVC liberally. This means you can arrest some- one involved in an accident for having driven while under the influ- ence, even though the arrest takes place " a reasonable time and dis- tance away from the scene of a traffic collision" Example; an officer responds to a call of a hklrun traf- fic collision, where the victim fol. lows the suspect home. Upon arri- val, the victim gives a description of the driver. The officer makes contact with the driver less than 30 minutes from the time of the traffic collision. The officer interviews the suspect, establishing he/she was the driver. While talking to the driver, the officer observes symp- toms of intoxication. Based upon witness state- ments, FST's and a reasonable time from when the traffic colli- sion occurred, the officer has enough to arrest, although the crime was not committed in his/ her presence. There will be times when you respond to the scene of a traf- fic collision and the suspected DUI driver is not sitting behind the steering wheel waking to be ar- rested. There are several ways to prove this. A) Independent witnesses B) Injuries to suspect consistent with physical evidence in or about the vehicle. C) Drivers own admissions. D) Car keys in the possession of the suspectidriver. E) RIO of vehicle is the same as suspected driver, or lives at same address. F) Check the position of the driver seat; short or tall per- son? Compare with what you have at the scene. G) Finally, if all fails and you have several occupants of a vehicle, simply ask them (separately of course) who was driving or if they were driving. This may help later even 9 the first per- son you talk to, admits to driv- ing. Stranger things have happen, where the defendant goes to court and claims he/she was not the driver, but rather another person at the scene was the real driver- Al- though there will be other factors, making every attempt to narrow down specifics (witnesses, physical and circumstantial evidence) will help your use, and possibly less time you have to spend in court. Public or Private Property Tows; Good or Bad ? retail customers. Good ex- amples of off-street parking; Stater Bros, Palm Desert Mall, WalMart, AMIPM. Poor exam- ples of off-street parking; apartment complex, gated community (take La Quinn). These have no retail sales and are not open to the general public. 22523(b) CVC prohibits any person from abandoning any vehicle upon a public or private without the express permission of the owner. 22669(a) CVC, allows law enforcement to remove any abandoned vehicle from any highway or public or private Riverside County Sheriff Volume I Issue 6 June I , 2001 Quids Reference: V.C. Sections for Private Prop. Towsllmpounds 22655.5(a) CVC ; used [ocom- mit a public offense. 22655.5(b) CVC; contains evi- dence of a crime. (1 1.44) 226SS (a) CVC; 20002 CVC, for inspection purposes. 22653 (a) CVC; stolen or em- bezzled . 22653(b) CVC; traffic collision, vehicle left at scene and RIO of vehicle cannot give permission to have vehicle towed. 22653 ( c) CVC; driver arrested and taken to jail. 226SS.3 CVC; pursued (2800.1,2800.2 CVC) and left abandoned at the scene, not prop- erty of RIO of vehicle. 22656 CVC; parked or left aban- doned on any railway. These are only summaries of appropriate private property storages and impounds. Please review the vehicle code for specif- ics and use good common sense and discretion in the application of them. property. to abandoned vehicles in a they must notify local law it has always been an parking lot Obviously, the enforcement within I hour unwritten station policy that officer should first deter- of the vehicle being towed. we do not tow any vehicles mine if the vehicle has Simply stated, this is off private property and it still been reported stolen or why we refrain from tow - remains in effect. The only been sought in a crime. If ing abandoned vehicles private property tows that are all checks out, the RIP from private property, civil acceptable are those related should be contacted and liability. to vehicles with expired vehi- advised of our policy and cle registration (22651(o)(I) leave the towing of the 'sal CVC, off-street parking facil- vehide to the owner in 6 ity, criminal investigations; i.e. charge of the property. stolen or embezzled vehicles, Always, remind the homicides, or hit and run RIP, that before having the traffic collisions, and for pur- vehicle towed, they as - poses of physical evidence. sume all civil responsibili- On occasion, officers ties. The property must will receive calls relating be properly posted per 22658(a) (1) CVC and Do you have any suggestions for future topics? If so, e-man them to nice on one county necwc rn. 523 Presented by: Department Report lo-fl City of La Quinta Fire Department Quarterly Report Dorian J. Cooley Battalion Chief 524 Tom Tisdale Fire Chief Proudly serving the unincorporated areas of Riverside Courtly and the cities of: Beaumont 0 Banning 4. Calimesa e. Canyon Lake 0 Coachella 0 Desert Hot Springs Indian Wells Indio 0 Lake Elsinore 0 La Quints Moreno Valley 0 Palm Desert 4 Perris Rancho Mirage San Jacinto 0 Temecula Board of Supervisor: Bob Buster, District 1 John Tavaglione, District Jim Venable, District 3 Roy Wilson, District 4 Tom Mullen, Detroit 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT In cooperation with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection 210 West San Jacinto Avenue • Perris, California 92570 • (909) 940-6900 • FAX (909) 940.10 June 9, 2001 Honorable Mayor Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Ref Quarterly Report Attached please find the Fire Department Quarterly Report for the City of La Quinta for January through March of 2001. The report depicts the following highlights: Riverside County Fire Department units responded to a total of: • Medical Aids 295 • False Alarms 0 • Structure Fires 15 • Vegetation Fires 5 • Automatic Ringing False Alarm 66 • Other Fires (vehicle, refuse, etc.) 15 • Public Service Assists 12 (non -emergency assistance) • Fire Menace Standby 7 (fuel spill, gas leak etc.) Overall, it is noticed that call volume increased 15% this year when compared to first quarter of last year. This increase was seen primarily in EMS calls. Attachments Respectfully submitted, Tom Tisdale Fire Chief ZI By: Dorian J. Cooley Battalion Chief La Quinta City Fire Responses Yearly Totals Quarterly Comparisons ❑ 2001 ■ 2000 a) € Q LL 7 N N LL 2 N N ci N LL N ` (D N 0 N C Q a) .y N cu C w U Q !n m D LL a) i a First Quarter 2001 2000 Medical Aids 295 235 False Alarms 0 24 Structure Fire 15 15 Vegetation Fires 5 4 Ringing Alarms 66 34 Other Fires 15 15 Public Service Assists 12 24 Fire Menace Standby 7 4 TOTALSI 415 355 6,9,01 5 2 J 1. La Quinta City Fire Responses Quarterly Totals Monthly Totals a_p U N Q 7 I1 U O N Q I1 y Q C c0 fn v ti U CD rn c m O v m v c CO a) > U a LL ■ January-01 ■ February-01 ❑ March-01 Janua -01 Februa -01 March-01 Medical Aids 107 77 111 False Alarms 0 0 0 Structure Fire 3 1 11 Vegetation Fires 2 1 2 Ringing Alarms 27 12 27 Other Fires 9 3 3 Public Service Assists 4 4 4 Fire Menace Standby 2 1 4 TOTALSI 154 99 162 526 La Quinta City Fire Responses Monthly Breakdown ■ Medical Aids ■ False Alarms ❑ Structure Fire ❑ Vegetation Fires ■ Ringing Alarms ■ Other Fires ■ Public Service Assists E3 Fire Menace Standby January-01 Janua -01 Medical Aids 107 False Alarms 0 Structure Fire 3 Vegetation Fires 2 Ringing Alarms 27 Other Fires 9 Public Service Assists 4 Fire Menace Standby 2 La Quinta City Fire Responses Monthly Breakdown ■ Medical Aids ■ False Alarms ❑ Structure Fire ❑ Vegetation Fires ■ Ringing Alarms ■ Other Fires ■ Public Service Assists m Fire Menace Standby February-01 Februa -01 Medical Aids 77 False Alarms 0 Structure Fire 1 Vegetation Fires 1 Ringing Alarms 12 Other Fires 3 Public Service Assists 4 Fire Menace Standby 1 5 r) 1 La Quinta City Fire Responses Monthly Breakdown ■ Medical Aids ■ False Alarms ❑ Structure Fire ❑ Vegetation Fires ■ Ringing Alarms ■ Other Fires ■ Public Service Assists E3 Fire Menace Standby March-01 March-01 Medical Aids 111 False Alarms 0 Structure Fire 11 Vegetation Fires 2 Ringing Alarms 27 Other Fires 3 Public Service Assists 4 Fire Menace Standby 4 509 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing Lighting Assessment Distric 2001/2002 t on Landscape and 89-1, Fiscal Year AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of La Quinta confirming the diagram and assessment for Landscape and Lighting District 89-1, Fiscal Year 2001/2002, pursuant to the Engineer's Report. 1;��•L•IIlirtl]�[•7_�lI.7�F� Implementation of the recommendation outlined in this report will generate approximately $781,405 in revenue from Landscape and Lighting District assessments for Fiscal Year 2001/2002, offsetting estimated Landscape and Lighting District expenditures of approximately $1,035,256 for the same period of time. u' • None. On May 15, 2001, the City Council adopted the following two (2) resolutions: Resolution No. 2001- 48 (Attachment 1), approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report for Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1, Fiscal Year 2001/2002; Resolution No. 2001- 49 (Attachment 2), declaring intention to levy annual assessments for maintenance and servicing landscape and lighting improvements within the boundaries of the territory included in the Citywide Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1, and giving notice thereof. The Engineer's Report is required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 and must include the following information: 1. A description of the services to be provided throughout the District. 530 T:\PWDEPT\C0UNC1L\2001 \010618a.wpd 2. Total costs necessary to provide all services described in the Engineer's Report. 3. A diagram showing the boundaries of the District, including special benefit zones. 4. An assessment schedule. The May 2001 Engineer's Report, prepared by City staff with the parcel reconciliation completed by MBIA MuniFinancial, provides the required information for the Landscape and Lighting District 89-1 for Fiscal Year 2001/2002. A copy of the report is on file in the City Clerk's office. The Engineer's Report projects the following for Fiscal Year 2001/2002 in comparison to the Fiscal Year 2000/2001 Engineer's Report: FY 2000/2001 FY 2001/2002 Citywide benefit zone Yes Yes Number of local benefit zones 6 6 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's) 21,732 21,950 EDU Rate $35.60/EDU $35.60/EDU District Revenue $773,675 $781,405 The actual assessment per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) has not changed from the previous year. The Engineer's Report was completed in accordance with provisions set forth by Proposition 218, which was passed by the voting public during the November 1996 election. The total proposed Landscape & Lighting Budget expenses for 2001/2002 total $1,530,412. This amount reflects the cost estimates for exempt landscape maintenance projects (within the road right-of-way) and non-exempt landscape maintenance projects (parks and facilities). The total cost for exempt projects within the Citywide Benefit Zone as indicated in the Preliminary Engineer's Report is $1,031,416. Last year the total estimate for exempt projects in the District was $1,137,309. The Preliminary Engineer's Report indicates a decrease in the LLD estimated exempt costs of $105,893, from $1,137,309 in Fiscal Year 2000/2001 to $1,031,416 projected for Fiscal Year 2001/2002. The budget decrease is primarily due to bidding the Citywide Landscape Maintenance Contract for renewal. In the relatively competitive market for this type of work in the area, the City received lower bids. Prior to bid, the Citywide Landscape Maintenance Contract was approximately $596,000 annually. On July 5, 2000, the City Council awarded the Citywide Landscape Maintenance Contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Lundeen Pacific Corporation, in the amount of approximately $470,300. The estimated exempt costs for 2001/2002 have been projected utilizing the amounts in the current Citywide Landscape Maintenance contract, with increases based on the March 2001 Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the following added areas: 531 002 TAP WDEPT\COUNCIL\2001 \01 061 9a.WPd 1 . The Redevelopment Agency (RDA) property perimeter at Ave. 47 and Adams Street. 2. The Del Rey Retention Basin. 3. Auto Mall Drive Medians. 4. Calle Rondo Channel. 5. Marbella Tract II, S/E corner of Adams Street and Miles Avenue. The proposed 2001/2002 budget of $1,O35,256 for exempt projects includes $1,031,416 for the total citywide benefit zone and $3,84O for the North La Quinta Sub Zone expenses. As was the case in Fiscal Year 1995/1996 through Fiscal Year 2000/2001, it is proposed that the North La Quinta Sub Zones continue to be identified in the Engineer's Report and the expenses be funded from sources outside of the Landscape & Lighting Assessment District. Under the provisions of Proposition 218, in order to increase assessments within the Lighting and Landscape District, it is required to conduct a public vote on the increased assessments. This public vote may only occur during an election year in which city officials are running for election. Therefore, last year's assessment of $35.6O per EDU is proposed for the Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 assessment. With the new parcel reconciliation, the estimated total revenue for the District is $781,4O5. The difference ($253,851) will be funded through the General Fund. These numbers indicate a shortfall when considering projects that are exempt from the provisions of Proposition 218. Exempt projects include all landscape and lighting within the transportation right-of-way. Landscape and lighting facilities that are not in the transportation right-of-way include parks and public facilities. These projects are not exempt from the provisions of Proposition 218. The proposed fiscal year 2001-2002 budget for all city lighting and landscaping (exempt and non-exempt) is $1,530,412. The total impact to the General Fund due to the Lighting and Landscape assessment shortfall ($253,851), and the non-exempt projects ($495,156) is $749,007. On June 5, 2001, the City Council conducted a Public Meeting in order to provide the affected property owners an opportunity to ask the City Council and staff questions pertaining to the proposed changes to the Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1 for Fiscal Year 2001 /2002, as outlined in the Preliminary Engineer's Report, dated May 2001. No one chose to speak regarding the proposed changes. Should the City Council receive testimony from the public through the end of the Public Hearing that warrants a change to the assessment level, the City Council can adjust the assessment levels. However, the assessment can either stay the same or be reduced in comparison to the assessment from Fiscal Year 2000/2001. A reduction in the assessment level will impact the revenues necessary to fund the proposed Landscape and Lighting operational budget for Fiscal Year 2001 /2002. If service levels are not adjusted accordingly, the General Fund would need to be utilized to make up the difference between the reduced revenue level and the 532 003 TAP WDEPT\COUNCIL\2001 \010616a.wpd proposed Landscape and Lighting operational budget. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of La Quinta confirming the diagram and assessment for Landscape and Lighting District 89-1, Fiscal Year 2001 /2002, pursuant to the Engineer's Report; or 2. Direct staff to adjust the Engineer's Report to reflect any changes approved by the City Council upon the conclusion of the Public Hearing. Should the City Council direct amendments to the Engineer's Report, dated May 2001, an amended Engineer's Report and the impacts of the amendments will be submitted to the City Council for approval at the July 17, 2001 City Council Meeting. Upon approval, the City Council will adopt a resolution confirming the assessment diagram and assessments for Fiscal Year 2001 /2002, pursuant to the modified Engineer's Report. Any reduction in the assessment will result in a reduction of Landscape and Lighting District revenues available for Fiscal Year 2001 /2002, requiring one or a combination of the following: Supplement Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 revenues with other fund sources, such as the General Fund; Reduce services to reflect the reduced revenue levels; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Chris A. Vogt, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Resolution 2001- 48 2. Resolution 2001- 49 533 TAPWDEPT\CDUNCIL\2001 \010618a.wpd 004 RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 89-1 (Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972) The City Council of the City of La Quinta Resolves: SECTION 1. Pursuant to Chapter 3 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Council directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an annual report for Fiscal Year 2001/2002. SECTION 2. The City Engineer filed an annual report on May 15, 2001, and the City Council adopted its Resolution of Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments within Assessment District 89-1 for Fiscal Year 2001/2002 and set a Public Meeting date of June 5, 2001 and a Public Hearing date of June 19, 2001 at the La Quinta City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. Notice of the Public Meeting and Public Hearing was given in the time and manner required by law. SECTION 3. On June 5, 2001, a Public Meeting for which notice was given was conducted at which every interested person was given an opportunity to object to the proposed assessment. SECTION 4. On June 19, 2001, a Public Hearing for which notice was given was conducted at which every interested person was given an opportunity to object to the proposed assessment in writing or orally, and the City Council has considered each protest. SECTION 5. On June 19, 2001, the City Council found that written protests against the proposed assessment had not been made by owners representing more than one-half of the area of the land to be assessed. SECTION 6. The City Council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment as set forth in the annual report of the Engineer of Work and hereby levies the assessment set forth for Fiscal Year 2001/2002. 534 005 T:\PWDEPTkC0UNC1L\2001 \010619a.wpd PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19' Day of June 2001 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: John J. Pena, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 535 006 T:\PWDEPT\C0UNC1LQ001 \010619a.wpd Attachment 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE ENGINEER FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002IN CONNECTION WITH LA QUINTA LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, pursuant to the provisions of Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, did on March 6, 2001, order the City Engineer, Chris A. Vogt, P.E., to prepare and file a report in accordance with Article 4 of Chapter 1 and Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, commencing with Section 22565, for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2001 and ending June 30, 2002 in connection with La Quinta Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared and filed with the City Clerk of the City of La Quinta and the City Clerk has presented the City Council such report entitled "La Quinta Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1, Preliminary Engineer's Report" (the "Report); and WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully examined and reviewed such Report. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Report, as filed, is hereby approved. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 15`" day of May, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena NOES: None Ie1:����R.Tita- ABSTAIN: None City of La Quinta, California 536 008 Resolution No. 2001-48 L&LD 89-1 IFY 2001 /2002 Report of the Engineer Adopted: May 15, 2001 Page 2 ATTEST: JUNE EK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. ERI JENSON, Cifttorney Cit of La Quinta, Californi 537 009 Attachment 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TERRITORY INCLUDED IN THE CITYWIDE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-1 AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND GIVING NOTICE THEREOF WHEREAS, the City Council by its Resolution No. 89-9 initiated proceeding pursuant to provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, commencing with Section 22500 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), for the formation of a Landscape and Lighting Assessment District designated "La Quinta Landscape and Lighting Assessment "District No. 89-1 ", shall include all of the territory located within the boundaries of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to levy and collect assessments within -- proposed La Quints Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 89-1 for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2001 and ending June 30, 2002 to pay the costs and expenses of constructing, operating, maintaining, and servicing landscaping, lighting and appurtenant facilities located within public places in the City; and WHEREAS, the Engineer selected by the City Council has prepared and filed with the City Clerk of the City of La Quinta and the City Clerk has presented to the City Council a report in connection with the proposed La Quinta Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 89-1 and the City Council did by previous Resolution approve such report. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of La Quinta (hereinafter referred to as the "City Council") has previously formed Landscape and Lighting District No. 89-1 pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, commencing with Section 225500 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). 539 i,10 Resolution No. 2001-49 LUD 89-11FY 200112002 Intent to Levy Aaeeeetnents Adopted: May 15, 2001 Page 2 Section 2. The City Council hereby finds: 1) that the maintenance and operation of projects identified in the Preliminary Engineer's report for this District No. 89-1 consisting solely of exempt items of sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, and/or drainage pursuant to Article 13D Section 5(a) of the California Constitution, and 2) that the public interest requires, and 3) declares its intention to levy and collect assessments for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2001 and ending June 30, 2002 to pay for the costs and expenses of the improvements described in Section 4 hereof. Section 3. The territory included within the boundaries of the Assessment District includes all of the land included within the boundaries of the City. Section 4. Reference is hereby made to the report of the Engineer on file with the City Clerk of the City of La Quinta for a full and fair description of the improvements, the boundaries of the Assessment District and any zones therein and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District. Section 5. Notice is hereby given that the 5"' day of June 2001, 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253, is the time and place fixed for a public meeting by the City Council to allow public testimony regarding the proposed increased assessment. Section 6. Notice is hereby given that the 191h day of June 2001, 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253, is the time and place fixed for a Public Hearing by the City Council on the question of the levy of the proposed assessment for Assessment District 89-1. Any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing, or, withdrawal of the protest. A written protest shall state all grounds of objections and a protest by a property owner shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by such property owner. At the hearing, all interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard. Section 7. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to give notice of such hearings as provided in the Act. Section 8. The City Council hereby designates the Desert Sun as the newspaper in which notice of the Public Hearing shall be published. 539 i�11 Resolution No. 2001-49 -- L&LD 99-1 /FY 2001 /2002 Intent to Levy Ammurne to Adopted: May 15, 2001 Page 3 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 15' day of May 2001, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None oa. JO PENA, ftyor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: 0La REEK, CIVIC,Clerk Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENFAN, City Attorney -- City of La Quinta, California 540 .0 � T s �5 CE`y OF'Ct�''9 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL /� FROM: PJERRY HERMAN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR A" DATE: JUNE 19, 2001 SUBJECT: CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FOR KSL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION APPLICATIONS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AVENUE 50 AND EISENHOWER DRIVE. (ADDENDUM TO EIR #41, GPA 2001-078, ZC 2001-101, SPECIFIC PLAN 121-E AMENDMENT #5, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-703 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30125) KSL Land Development submitted a letter to the City Council on June 4, 2001, identifying their objections to Condition #47A.1 relating to the improvements required along Eisenhower Drive for Tentative Parcel Map 23125 (Attachment 1). Based upon the letter received from KSL, the City Council at their June 5, 2001 meeting, continued the applications to June 19, 2001 (Attachment 2), and directed staff to research the history regarding improvement requirements for Eisenhower Drive and the impacts of Agency assistance for street improvements which may affect the requirements of prevailing wages. The following is a chronological list of events relating to this project: 1. Riverside County Board of Supervisors in April 1975, approved Specific Plan 1 21-E. In May 1982, the Specific Plan was revised. At that time the County Road Department conditioned the developer to pay for three signals and contribute 15% of the total cost of widening to the ultimate design width or require Eisenhower Drive to be constructed from Avenida Fernando to Washington Street and Washington Street from Avenue 50 to Highway 111. 2. The Dunes Course was established in 1980, prior to La Quinta's incorporation. Staff is contacting Riverside County to see if they have any records that were not transmitted to the City. Typically, a golf course is built by the issuance of a grading/encroachment permit and is not conditioned for road improvements. Road improvements are generally required in subsequent subdivision tract approvals. 541 G:\WPDOCS\memojhCounci1SP121-E.wpd 1 3. On September 27, 1979, the East Area Planning Council approved Tentative Tract Map 14497 for Landmark Land Company. Condition #7 of that Tract Map states: "the subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outlined in the County Road Department letter dated October 25, 1979, a copy of which is enclosed." The letter dated October 25, 1979 states as follows: "Eisenhower Drive between the northerly tract boundary and Calle Tampico shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 38 feet from the centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving within a 50 foot half - width conveyed right-of-way or sufficient right-of-way as approved by the Road Commissioner along the road segments situated outside the tract boundaries." In reviewing the road improvement plans for this tract, it shows road improvements being constructed along the west side of Eisenhower Drive and nothing along the east side. 4. Tract 14496-1 was recorded on August 22, 1981. This tract depicted a road right-of-way of 100 feet along Eisenhower Drive from Avenida Fernando to the Evacuation Channel. 5. Tentative Parcel Map 28334 was approved on May 16, 1996, as part of a Director's Hearing. Condition #10 requires: "Condition #10: As a condition of any final map or other land action allowing development of any portion of this property, the following minimum street improvements shall be constructed to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parenthesis: Eisenhower Drive (Primary Arterial) - 76 feet between curb faces with a 12 foot raised median along the full frontage of this parcel map." The parcel map included the entire frontage of Golf Hole #13 along Eisenhower Drive. 6. Tentative Parcel Map 28334 was recorded on March 5, 1997. 7. Site Development Permit 97-608 was approved by the City Council September 16, 1997 for the construction of an employee parking lot on 2.4 acres on the property located south and east of Hole #12 and #13 of the Dunes Course. Condition #32 requires: "Condition #32: The applicant shall complete Primary Arterial street improvements, except sidewalk and perimeter landscaping, on the east side of Eisenhower Drive from the La Quinta Evacuation Channel bridge to the existing improvements at Eisenhower Drive including a full width landscape median extending 540 feet south from the Avenue 50 001, G:\WPDOCS\memojhCounci1SP121-E.wpd 2 J A ! intersection (half the distance to the bridge). The City will allow a left -in pocket at the project entry if the applicant provides sufficient right-of- way width for a median configuration which blocks right turns out. Features contained in the approved construction plans may warrant additional street widths or other measures as determined by the City Engineer. The applicant may seek reimbursement from the landowner north of the applicant's property at the time the adjacent land develops, for median improvements constructed by the applicant which are adjacent to the other landowner's property. If the applicant desires reimbursement, it shall be sought and obtained in accordance with the City's reimbursement policy." 9. On January 5, 1999, the City Council approved Amendment #1 to Site Development Permit 97-608. This amendment dealt with Conditions #32 and #38 which KSL requested to be eliminated. During the public hearing process staff indicated that they could not support the request to eliminate the two conditions but revised the conditions to read as follows: "Condition #32. The following minimum street improvements shall be constructed to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses: A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1. Eisenhower Drive (Primary Arterial) - Completion of Primary Arterial street improvements on the east side of the centerline from Avenue 50 south approximately 540 feet, including a full width landscaped median and a six foot wide meandering sidewalk. The city will allow a left turn pocket at the project entry if the applicant provides sufficient right- of-way width for a median configuration which prevents left out movement. 2. Eisenhower Drive (Primary Arterial) (Deferred) - Completion of Primary Arterial street improvements on the east side of the centerline from approximately 540 feet south of Avenue 50 to the La Quinta Evacuation Channel, including a full width landscaped median and a six foot wide meandering sidewalk. The applicant shall secure the cost of design and construction until the improvements are completed. 003 G:\WPDGCS\memojhCounci1SP121-E.wpd 3 543 Condition #38: The applicant shall install all off -site street and sidewalk improvements required to be constructed within six months of the opening of the parking lot for use by employees. The applicant shall install all deferred off -site street and sidewalk improvements within five years of the opening of the parking lot for use by employees, unless required to be constructed earlier by the City." 10. On June 5, 2001, the Tentative Tract Map 30125 was presented to the City Council which contained a modification of the improvement requirements. "Condition #47: The applicant shall install the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. (Public street improvements shall conform with the City's General Plan in effect at the time of construction.)" A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1 . Eisenhower Drive (Primary Arterial)- Applicant shall comply with the approved Condition of Approval, No. 10, Tentative Parcel Map 28334, which is worded as follows: "As a condition of any final map or other land action allowing development of any portion of this property, the following minimum street improvements shall be constructed to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses: Eisenhower Drive (Primary Arterial) - 76' between curb faces with a 12' raised median along the full frontage of this parcel map." Condition to be amended to read: "Applicant shall construct half street improvement in compliance with the General Plan along the full frontage of Eisenhower, comprising that portion of Tentative Parcel Map 28334 and Tentative Tract Map 30125, to a point 60-feet north of the southwest property corner of Tract 28334, Parcel 3. Applicant shall construct six foot meandering sidewalk and 12-foot raised center median. Applicant will be reimbursed for the cost of the median construction from the Transportation DIF in an amount not to exceed the budget allowance for this median construction. G:\WPDOCS\memojhCounci1SP121-E.wpd 4 544 Applicant shall enter a secured agreement for the cost of the half street improvement from the point 60-feet north of the southwest property corner of Tract 28334, Parcel 3, to the north terminus of the future Eisenhower Drive bridge improvement." OTHER ISSUES Issues-KSL - The understanding and philosophy of Development Impact Fee (DIF). The transportation portion of the DIF was developed to insure that all future development would contribute to regional transportation mitigation issues based on a proper and defendable nexus. Through the nexus analysis and a number of meetings with the Building Industry Association, an agreement was reached on the definition of regional facilities. These include one lane in each direction where roads do not exist (backbone system), the middle lane in each direction of a three lane facility where the backbone system exists, the landscaped raised median (separating directions of traffic), and traffic signals and sound walls as required by additional traffic generated by development. The outside lane, including shoulder area, curb and gutter, sidewalk and parkway landscaping, is the responsibility of the development adjacent to the roadway. Also the responsibility of the developer is the stabilization of the side of the road, which could include a sloped area or retaining walls. City policy has been to condition developers to complete these improvements as part of their development, completely at their own cost. The development impact fees do not include the costs for these improvements; therefore, funding is not available through the DIF to pay for the improvements or to reimburse the developers for completing the improvements. One example of recent development that had similar conditions was the proposed Walgreens development on the southeast corner of Avenue 50 and Washington Street. The limits of this project extended from Avenue 50 south to the Washington Street bridge. Although all three northbound lanes are presently in place, the Walgreens developer was conditioned to build an exclusive right turn lane at Avenue 50, sidewalk and parkway improvements from the Washington Street bridge to Avenue 50, and any slope grading or retaining wall required to stabilize the roadway. There was to be no reimbursement to the developer for these costs. Another example is the Vista Montanas project, which is located on the east side of Eisenhower Drive between Calle Tampico and the Eisenhower Drive bridge. This project was conditioned to construct the outer lane of Eisenhower Drive, shoulder, curb and gutter, sidewalk and parkway improvements, and a slope or retaining wall to support Eisenhower Drive. 005 G:\WPDOCS\memojhCounci1SP121-E.wpd 5 5 4 5 Another example is the La Quinta Court project, which is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Highway 1 1 1 and Washington Street. The developer was conditioned to dedicate right-of-way and to build the outer lane and exclusive right turn lane, curb and gutter, sidewalk and parkway improvements. In case of the proposed Walgreens development and the Vista Montanas developments, the developer chose to utilize their property in order to grade the slope to support the roadway. If the developer wished to utilize more land for construction, the developer would design and construct a retaining wall to support the roadway. 2. Required Right -of -Way. KSL Land Development has requested that the City complete the retaining wall improvements as part of the Eisenhower Drive bridge project. This would include design, construction, construction management, soils testing, inspection and administration costs. Costs that are not as apparent are right-of-way costs for the retaining wall, which will be built on the private property side to be maintained by the developer, construction easement costs in order to access the property for the construction, and any restoration costs to Hole #13 of the Dunes Golf Course, landscaping, golf cart trail, and other restoration requirements for the private property. 3. Eisenhower Drive Designation- Primary Arterial. Eisenhower Drive is identified as a Primary Arterial, which is a four lane facility, with the right-of-way of 100 feet. This designation has been in place prior to the City of La Quinta incorporation. The projected traffic volume at build out in the area between Calle Tampico and the Eisenhower Drive bridge is 16,400 vehicles a day. A traffic count in 1997, indicated over 8,000 vehicles a day travel this road. A traffic study prepared by Endo Engineering for KSL, dated August 1997, estimated a traffic volume of 8,310 vehicles per day on Eisenhower Drive south of Avenue 50. Another traffic study was completed by VRPA Technologies for the Villa La Quinta project located on Eisenhower Drive north of Avenida Fernando. Existing traffic conditions as stated in the report, for Eisenhower Drive south of Avenue 50 indicate 10,000 vehicles a day (Figure 3.3)• The traffic counts completed in 1997, and in 2000, solidify the projection of the estimated average daily traffic of 16,400 vehicles a day as indicated in the General Plan. Included within the report is Attachment 1, a copy of Table CIR-1 "Roadway Functional Classifications" from the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. The City's targeted level of service (LOS), in conformance with the Riverside County Congestion Management Plan (CMP), is LOS "D". According to Table CRI-1, a two lane undivided street (Collector designation) functions at LOS "D", up to 15,000 vehicles per day. Over that amount indicates the roadway is functioning at LOS "E" which does not comply with the General Plan targeted LOS. Therefore, a four lane facility is required. Eisenhower Drive is an important element of the Circulation Element and provides the primary north/south access and egress from the La Quinta Cove. Eisenhower Drive is presently a four lane facility south of Calle Tampico and 006 G\WPD0CS\memojhCounci1SP121-E.wpd 6 546 north of Avenue 50. By allowing the area of Eisenhower Drive from Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico to remain at two lanes, a bottleneck situation will occur with traffic, which is detrimental to circulation and motorist safety. 4. An issue was raised as to who has liability if the road improvements are constructed and if there are accidents caused by golf balls which injure pedestrians or create a vehicular accident. The City Attorney had indicated that if injuries occur, KSL, the City, and the golfer are likely to be sued, and that the courts would determine the liability of each party. The City may wish to require KSL to defend and indemnify the City in such cases since KSL has created a situation in which the golf balls are entering right-of-way which was dedicated for street use. Additionally, the City may wish to direct staff to investigate the potential of requiring KSL to modify Hole #13 in order to eliminate a nuisance condition within the dedicated public right-of-way. 5. The issue has been raised whether the waiver of any of the street improvement conditions would subject the development of the project to the prevailing wage requirements. If the City Council wishes to waive all previous conditions relating to the street improvements, the waiver, in and of itself, would not have any implications on the prevailing wage issue. Moreover, if the City, independently, decided at some future date to construct the waived street improvements with General Funds, there would be no prevailing wage issue, since the City is exempted from prevailing wage requirements by its Charter status. Nor would the use of General Funds for the street improvements impact the prevailing wage issue for the private portion of the project. If the City were to decide to delete all previous conditions relating to the street improvements, and the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency were to subsequently and independently decide to fund Eisenhower Drive improvements including those waived, the Agency would have to pay prevailing wages for the street improvements. However, it is highly unlikely according to the City Attorney that such an action would subject the private project to prevailing wage, unless the improvements were being funded as part of an agreement with the developer or as part of a program to provide assistance to the developer. If the Agency decision to fund the improvements is totally independent and in no way tied to the private development, the prevailing wage issue should not arise as part of the private development. Finally, it should be noted that KSL approached City staff on June 12, 2001 and indicated that KSL was prepared to accept conditions and make improvements on Eisenhower Drive south of Avenue 50 up to Hole #13. KSL still suggests that they believe the City should accept responsibility for improvements, including the retaining wall, fronting Hole #13 in consideration of the fact that the hole already exists. This position, of course, does not address the fact that the road had previously been planned for four lanes, right-of-way dedicated, and conditions placed on other project approvals. 007 G:\WPDOCS\memojhCounci1SP121-E.wpd 7 547 MIJITANTi/J:l'1 Based upon prior approvals, KSL is responsible for the widening of Eisenhower Drive from the Evacuation Channel to Avenue 50 pursuant to City standards. These conditions are currently in force. G:\WPDOCS\memojhCounciISP121-E.wpd 8 548 ATTACHMENT #1 DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION QD June 4, 2001 Honorable Mayor John Pena Honorable Members of City Council City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: Tentative Tract Map 30125, Avenue 50/Eisenhower, La Quinta, California Dear John and Members of City Council: This correspondence is provided to memorialize our discussions with the staff of the City of La Quinta, members of the Planning Commission and each of you individually regarding the above referenced tract map. We object to and request forbearance from a portion of Condition of Approval #47.A.1 related to the improvements to Eisenhower. We have no objection to the obligation for Eisenhower improvements adjacent to Tentative Map 30125. However, we do request the removal of the obligation to improve Eisenhower (including walls and landscaping) on the property fronting Tentative Parcel Map 28334 (i.e., #13 golf hole of the Dunes Course). Reasons for our request would be as follows: • This tentative tract map is overburdened with off site obligations to the point that prospective developers of the site have been unable to secure adequate financing for the project. Even with approval of the forbearance requested, the site still has over $1 million in offsite obligations for approval of only 65 small lots. Also, the retaining wall required with the section in question intensifies the inequity. • The low density residential nature of the surrounding neighborhoods renders the site most appropriately developed in a similar manner and zone, therefore eliminating the ability to develop a higher density or higher intensity use to justify the off site obligations. • The Eisenhower obligations arose from the approval of the La Quinta Resort Homes project and the relocation of the La Quinta Resort & Club parking lot to the internal portion of the site and specifically due to the access to the site via Eisenhower. It was our understanding at the time that if we were to relocate the hotel parking area and abort the access on Eisenhower that we would be relieved from these obligations. We were given a five-year window to accomplish same. • Multiple traffic studies that the City has commissioned at our expense for this and other approvals do not support the primary arterial status of Eisenhower even upon the ultimate build -out of the City. However, we are cognizant of the desires of the residents and public officials to advance the widening of Eisenhower and we have previously agreed to improve the section south of the bridge to Calle Tampico and are agreeing to improve the section adjacent to our tentative map 55-920 PGA Boulevard • La Quinta, CA 92253 • (760) 564-7166 • Fax (760) 564-7131 010 549 Letter to City Council Tract 30125 June 4, 2001 Page 2 with this approval. Since most of these improvements are mostly warranted by "Public want" as opposed to infrastructure needs, we ask that you include the improvements adjacent to Tentative Parcel Map 28334 in the bridge -widening project funded through your Capital Improvement Program. We hope you can agree with this position and grant us forbearance from the condition as requested. If so, we are confident that we can attract a quality developer to this site and finally advance the development of this image corridor site. Sp*icer!ly,� S. Chevis Hosea V.P. Land Development Cc: Larry Lichliter Doug Yavanian Forrest Haag Tom Genovese Christine Di Iorio 01 i. 550 /��� 4btM ATTACHMENT#2 T4ht 4 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 Continued Public Hearing to Consider Certification of an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #41; General Plan Amendment 2001-078 and Zone Change 2001-101 to Change Lands Currently Designated Tourist Commercial to Low Density Residential, Specific Plan 121-E, Amendment #5 Establishing Development Standards and Design Guidelines for the Construction of 65 Single Family Homes, Common Area Facilities, and an Amendment to the Landscaping Plant Palette; Site Development Permit 2001-703 for Development Plans for the Model Homes; and Tentative Tract Map 30125 for the Subdivision of 17.82 Acres into 65 Single Family Lots and Miscellaneous Lots for the Property Located at the Southeast Corner of Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50. Applicant: KSL Development Corp RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council Certifying an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #41. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment 2001-078. Move to take up Ordinance No. _ by title and number only and waive further reading. Move to introduce Ordinance No. , on first reading for Zone Change 2001-101. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Amendment No. 5 to Specific Plan 121 .E. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Site Development Permit 2001-703. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract Map 30125. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. 0121 G:\WPDOCS\CCStf.Rpt.SP1 21 . E. wpd 551 BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The project site is located at the southeast corner of Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50 (Attachment 1). The proposed project is currently developed for a portion of the La Quinta Resort golf course, and is also being used for employee parking for the La Quinta Resort. The lands currently used for parking are proposed for conversion to Low Density Residential. The proposal is for single family detached units on 6,000 square foot minimum lots. Project Request In addition to the Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #41, the following applications have been filed: A General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to change a six acre portion of the project surrounded by 11 acres already designated as single family residential from its current Tourist Commercial designation to Low Density Residential. 2. A Specific Plan to establish design standards and guidelines for the construction of 65 single family homes and common area amenities, change the minimum lot size to 6,000 square feet, and to amend the approved plant palette (Attachment 2). 3. A Site Development Permit for the model home elevations, site landscaping, and construction of perimeter improvements for the site (Attachment 3). 4. A Tentative Tract Map to divide 17.82 acres into 65 single family lots, a common pool and clubhouse lot, and miscellaneous lots for roads and open space (Attachment 4). The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change are required to allow single family dwelling units on the site. The Specific Plan provides the design guidelines and standards for the single family homes. A Site Development Permit has also been submitted to include the three models of house planned for the site, as well as perimeter and entry landscaping. A separate Site Development Permit will be required for the pool building or clubhouse for the northwestern corner of the project. The Site Development Permit details the architectural style of the buildings, and the types of materials which will be utilized. The variations to the City's zoning standards are discussed individually below. The Specific Plan includes modifications only in two areas: the design guidelines and development standards for the affected Planning Area, and the broadening of the landscaping palette (Attachment 4). The design guidelines and development standards allow for the construction of single family homes and associated uses. 013 G:\WPDOCS\CCStf.Rpt.SP1 21 .E.wpd 552 The homes' architecture is similar to the Mediterranean architecture found elsewhere in the Resort. Materials to be utilized include smooth stucco, wooden rafters, gates and shutters, wrought iron grills and clay roof tile. The design includes raised window details, stucco recesses and an optional roof terrace. The design also incorporates curved walls and exterior stairs around a central courtyard. The applicant has provided considerable articulation on all sides of the residences, which will create visual interest and break up the building mass. Doorways and windows include arches and pot ledges, to provide further detail. The color palette is proposed to be neutral, and consists primarily of earth tones. The plant palette is consistent with that found in other parts of the Resort. Stamped concrete is proposed for the entry of the project site. A perimeter wall is proposed, but no berming is shown on the landscaping plan. The Tentative Tract Map divides the 17.82 acres into 65 single family lots, one common area pool and clubhouse lot, and miscellaneous lots for roads and open space areas. The Tract Map has been conditioned to include all necessary perimeter roadway improvements. The Tract Map is consistent with the proposed Specific Plan. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed this project at its regularly scheduled public hearing of May 22, 2001 (Attachment 5). A number of issues were discussed. Several are enumerated below. Specific Plan: Development Standards The applicant has stated that a small clubhouse may be constructed where the poolhouse is currently shown, in the northwestern corner of the property. The Specific Plan currently does not allow this use. Condition No. 15 (SP) has been added to address this issue. The minimum lot size is shown in the Specific Plan to be 6,500 square feet in this Planning Area. Since some lots on the accompanying tract map do not meet this standard (the smallest lot is 6,022 s.f.), Condition No. 17 (SP) was added to accommodate the smallest proposed lot. During discussion by the Planning Commission, however, they determined that the 6,000 square foot lot size was too small for lots which do not abut the golf course. The condition was therefore amended to allow 6,000 square foot lots on the golf course, but 6,500 square foot lots if there is no adjacency to the course. The landscaping palette in the currently adopted Specific Plan significantly limits the plant types permitted on the site. The landscaping plan does not conform to that plant palette. A broadened plant palette has been submitted (Attachment 4), and is to be included as an approved landscaping palette for the entire Specific Plan (Condition No. 20, SP). 014 GAWPDOCS\CCStf.Rpt.SP1 21 .E.wpd 553 The Planning Commission also considered the need for a three car garage on homes with 4 bedrooms within the project. The Planning Commission recommends allowing garages with tandem parking, so that the entire front of the house is not taken up by garage doors (Condition of Approval No. 19). Finally, the applicant expressed a concern regarding Condition of Approval No. 22, which required the removal of the employee parking lot, and completion off -site prior to the issuance of grading permits. The Planning Commission amended the condition to require that this be completed prior to the final inspection of the tenth house, to allow the applicant more time to complete the off -site lot. In addition, at the public hearing Mr. David Erwin of Best Best & Krieger, LLP, made a presentation on behalf of the La Quinta Country Club. A copy of his letter is contained in Attachment 6. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The findings necessary to approve this request can be made, and are included in the attached Resolutions. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council Certifying an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #41; Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment 2001-078; Move to take up Ordinance No. _ by title and number only and waive further reading. Move to introduce Ordinance No. on first reading for Zone Change 2001-101; Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Amendment No. 5 to Specific Plan 121-E; Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Site Development Permit 2001-703; and Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract Map 30125; or 2. Do not adopt the above Resolutions; or 015 G AW PDOCS\CCStf.Rpt.SP1 21 . E.wpd 554 3. Remand the applications to the Planning Commission for further consideration; or; 4. Continue the request and provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Jerry Herman Community Development Director Approved for Submission: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Location Map 2. Specific Plan 121-E Document (large copies for Council only) 3. Esperanza Elevations and Floor Plans (large copies for Council only) 4. Tract Map 30125 (large copies for Council only) 5. Planning Commission Minutes of May 22, 2001. 6. Letter from David Erwin, Best Best & Krieger dated May 11, 2001 G:\W PDOCS\CCStf.Rpt.SP121 .E.wpd 555 RESOLUTION 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING AN ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT #41 PREPARED FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-078, ZONE CHANGE 2001-101, SPECIFIC PLAN 121-E AMENDMENT #5, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-703, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30125 CASE NO: EIR #41 ADDENDUM APPLICANT: KSL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 5th and 19"' of June, 2001 hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #41 for General Plan Amendment 2001- 078, Zone Change 2001-101, Specific Plan 121-E Amendment #5, Site Development Permit 2001-703 and Tentative Tract Map 30125 located at the southeast corner of Avenue 50 and Eisenhower Drive, and more particularly described as follows: APN's 658-190-004, 773-020-033, 770-020-021, 773-020-034 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 8th and 22nd days of May, 2001 hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #41 for General Plan Amendment 2001-078, Zone Change 2001-101, Specific Plan 121-E Amendment #5, Site Development Permit 2001-703 and Tentative Tract Map 30125 located at the southeast corner of Avenue 50 and Eisenhower Drive; and WHEREAS, said Addendum has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has determined that although the proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-078, Zone Change 2001-101, Specific Plan 121-E Amendment #5, Site Development Permit 2001-703 and Tentative Tract Map 30125 could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because appropriate mitigation measures were made a part of the Addendum and included in the Conditions of Approval; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify certifying said Addendum: - 017 G:\W PDOCS\CCResoKSLEA#41 .wpd 556 City Council Resolution 2001-_ KSL Development Corporation - EIR#41 Addendum June 19. 2001 The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-078, Zone Change 2001-101, Specific Plan 121-E Amendment #5, Site Development Permit 2001-703 and Tentative Tract Map 30125 will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by the Addendum. 2. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-078, Zone Change 2001-101, Specific Plan 121-E Amendment #5, Site Development Permit 2001-703 and Tentative Tract Map 30125 will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 4. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-078, Zone Change 2001-101, Specific Plan 121-E Amendment #5, Site Development Permit 2001-703 and Tentative Tract Map 30125 do not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Addendum. 4. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-078, Zone Change 2001-101, Specific Plan 121-E Amendment #5, Site Development Permit 2001-703 and Tentative Tract Map 30125 will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. 5. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-078, Zone Change 2001-101, Specific Plan 121-E Amendment #5, Site Development Permit 2001-703 and Tentative Tract Map 30125 will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 6. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 01$ G:\WPDOCS\CCReso KSLEA#41 . wpd 55' City Council Resolution 2001- KSL Development Corporation - EIR#41 Addendum June 19, 2001 7. The City Council has considered the Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #41 and the Addendum reflects the independent judgement of the City. 8. The City has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 9. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitutes the findings of the City Council for this Addendum. 2. That it does hereby certify this Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #41 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Addendum attached hereto and made part of. 3. That the Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #41 reflects the independent judgement of the City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 19th day of June, 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 019 G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLEA#41 .wpd 559 City Council Resolution 2001-_ KSL Development Corporation - EIR#41 Addendum June 19, 2001 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 020 G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLEA#41.wpd 559 ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (CEQA GUIDELINE 15164) SPECIFIC PLAN 121-E, AMENDMENT #5 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2001-078, CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 2001-101, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-703 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30125 Planning Commission Resolution 2001-080 Adopted May 22, 2001 City Council Resolution 2001- Adopted June 19, 2001 G:\WPDOCS\EIRAdd KSL121 E.WPD 021 560 The City of La Quinta, as lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code section 21000, et seq. ("CEQA") has prepared this Addendum pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15164. This is an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #41 ("EIR") that the County of Riverside certified in 1975 for the La Quinta Resort Specific Plan, SP 121-E. The purpose of this Addendum is to document certain changes to the project which will be implemented through the following land use approvals: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2001-78, AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO SPECIFIC PLAN 121-E, CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 2001-101, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-70 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30125 These are collectively referred to as "the Revised Project." The Revised Project consists of 17.82 acres of the 622 acre project. Six acres of the Revised Project area is currently designated Tourist Commercial and the remaining 11 acres is designated as Low Density Residential. The Revised Project will convert currently vacant lands of which six acres os being used as interim employee parking areas to low density residential lots, and ancillary facilities including a clubhouse and associated amenities. The City has determined that the proposed residential development will be consistent with the density and character of the adjacent residential development, and will be consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City's General Plan and Specific Plan 121-E, as amended. The Revised Project does not represent an increase in the total number of units allowed within the Specific Plan boundary. The Specific Plan "cap" on residential units remains 622 units in the low density residential category. The approvals requested include the following: 1. General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone to change the designation on six acres of the 17.82 acres from Tourist Commercial to Low Density Residential; 2. Specific Plan Amendment to incorporate the General plan Amendment and Zone Change above, and to expand the landscaping palette within the Specific Plan; 3. Site Development Permit to review the design of three residential unit types for the proposed homes within the same 17.82 acres; and 4. Tentative Tract Map to divide the 17.82 acres into 65 single family lots, a clubhouse lot, and a number of numbered lots for streets and common open space areas. The City has compared the impacts of the Revised Project with those impacts analyzed in the EIR and finds as follows: 022 G:\WPDOCS\EIRAddKSL121 E.WPD 561 Aesthetics - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The previously approved Tourist Commercial designation will be replaced with less dense housing. The scale, height, and mass will all be reduced within this area as compared with the original project. The elimination of employee parking will be a beneficial impact for the area. Agriculture Resources - Not applicable Hazards and Hazardous Materials - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. Hydrology and Water Quality - Impacts lower than those previously analyzed. Tourist commercial development can be expected to generate an equivalent amount of water usage as residential development. The single family homes on the site, however, will create a lower percentage of impervious surfaces, which will result in more surface water percolation. Public Services - Impacts lower than those previously analyzed. The impacts associated with Tourist Commercial development would have been expected to be greater than those associated. Recreation - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The Revised project will include on -site clubhouse facilities, and will be surrounded by golf course. The overall number of residential units within the total project will not increase. Impacts to recreational facilities will not increase over those already analysed. 023 G:\WPDOCS\EIRAddKSL121 E.WPD 5 6 21 Air Quality - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. Although residential development generates a high number of trips per unit, tourist c o m m e r c i a l development is also a high trip generator. Since the certification of the original EIR, PM10 has become an issue of concern in the Coachella Valley. The City requires the development of PM10 management plans, which are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits. The project proponent will be required to submit such a plan, which will provide sufficient mitigation to assure that PM10 impacts are reduced to less than significant levels. The construction air quality impacts will be reduced for single family homes over those analyzed for tourist c o m m e r c i a l development in the EIR, since single family home construction disturbs less ground, is of shorter duration, and requires less equipment. Land Use Planning - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The Revised Project is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan and the Specific Plan, and continues the development pattern established in the Specific Plan. Transportation/Traffic- Impacts less than those previously analyzed. The single family units will not increase the total number of units to be constructed within the project, and will therefore not increase the number of residential trips to be generated by the project at buildout. The elimination of the tourist commercial development will reduce the overall number of trips to and from the project at buildout. 024 G:\WPDOCS\EIRAdd KSL121 E.WPD Biological Resources - Impacts in addition to those previously analyzed. Since certification of the original EIR, species of concern in the Coachella Valley have increased. A preliminary biological resource analysis conducted for the Revised Project indicated the presence of a mesquite hummock on the site, which will be eliminated by the construction of the homes. Mesquite hummocks provide important habitat to a number of species of concern. In order to mitigate this potential impact, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: Prior to construction or site preparation activities, the project developer shall enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with CDFG and an appropriate non-profit organization whose purpose is to acquire and manage land for the purpose of protecting special status plants and wildlife. This MOU shall provide the organization chosen the financial resources necessary to purchase and manage 1.1 acres of mesquite hummock habitat in the Biological Resources, cont'd - The Revised project also was identified as potential habitat for Coachella Valley Fringe - toed Lizard and Coachella Valley Milk Vetch. Site surveys are being conducted, and the project proponent will be required to conform to the mitigation measures resulting from these studies. Utilities and Service Systems - Impacts less than those previously analyzed. The proposed residential units will generate a lower need for utilities and service systems than development of a tourist commercial project on six acres of the site. 025 G:\WPDOCS\EIRAdd KSL121 E.WPD 564 Cultural Resources Mineral Resources -Not Housing - Po7an Impacts no greater than applicable. Imthan those those previously pranalyzed. analyzed. The site has Thin land use been previously deill reduce disturbed, and is not thnumber of expected to contain jobs to be generated by culturally significant the project overall, and Should will not create a need for resources. b e additional housing. r e s o u r c e s encountered during site grading and excavation, the project proponent shall cease all work on the site until an archaeological monitor has been retained. 026 565 G:\WPDOCS\EIRAddKSL121 E.WPD Geology and Soils - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The project proponent shall be required to implement the Uniform Building Code for Zone III groundshaking zones, and shall be required to prepare site -specific soils analysis prior to issuance of building permits. Noise - Impacts have changed from those previously analyzed. A noise impact analysis was prepared for the Revised Project. The noise analysis identified potential impacts to homes adjacent to both Avenue 50 and Eisenhower Drive. In order to mitigate this impact, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented. 1. A 6 foot wall above a four foot berm shall be erected on both the Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50 frontages of the Revised Project. 2. Interior noise levels shall not exceed 45 dBA CNEL. 3.All construction activities shall be limited to the hours prescribed in the La Quinta Municipal Code. 4. Construction staging areas shall be located as far from e x i s t i n g residential development as possible. 027 G:\WPDOCS\EIRAddKSL121 E.WPD 566 The City finds that consideration of the Revised Project does not call for the preparation of a subsequent EIR pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15162 or Public Resources Code Section 21166, in that the Revised Project does not involve: 1. substantial changes to the project analyzed in the EIR which would involve new significant effects on the environment or substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts; 2. substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which would involve new significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the EIR substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts; or 3. new information of substantial importance which would involve new significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the EIR substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts. 028 G:\WPDOCS\EIRAddKSL1 21 E.WPD 567 RESOLUTION 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CHANGE IN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM TOURIST COMMERCIAL TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR SIX ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EISENHOWER DRIVE AND AVENUE 50 CASE NO.: GPA 2001-078 APPLICANT: KSL DEVELOPMENT CORP. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5th and 191h day of June, 2001, hold duly noticed Public Hearings for KSL Development Corp. for review of a General Plan Amendment to assign a land use designation of Low Density Residential to six acres located within a 17.82 acre parcel at the southeast corner of Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50, and more specifically described as follows: APN's: 658-190-004, 773-020-033, 773-020-021, 773-020-034 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 8th and 22nd day of May, 2001, hold duly noticed Public Hearings for KSL Development Corp. for review of a General Plan Amendment to assign a land use designation of Low Density Residential to six acres located within a 17.82 acre parcel at the southeast corner of Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50. WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings approving said General Plan Amendment: 1. Internal General Plan Consistency. The proposed amendment to the Land Use Map would change the designation on six acres of land from Tourist Commercial to Low Density Residential. The proposed amendment is surrounded by approximately 11 acres designated as Low Density Residential in the General Plan. The proposed amendment maintains consistency within the other General Plan elements, insofar as the Low Density Residential land use designation is the most prevalent designation in the General Plan. 2. Public Welfare. The proposed project requires the extension of all public services to the site as part of project development. In addition, conditions of approval and environmental mitigation measures have been included for this project which address safety and welfare issues, including noise, traffic and water quality. GAWPD0CS\CCResoKSLGPA078.wpd 029 568 City Council Resolution 2001-_ General Plan Amendment 2001-078 KSL Development Corp. June 19, 2001 3. General Plan Compatibility. The proposed General Plan amendment will be compatible with the surrounding designations in the project area, insofar as the Low Density Residential designation is prevalent within Specific Plan 121-E, and this project will continue this trend of development. 4. Property Suitability. The property is well suited to residential development, being primarily flat, and having adequate access to major roadways. 5. Change in Circumstances. The continued development of the City requires residential dwelling units for new residents, in order to meet the goals of the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby confirm the conclusion that the Addendum to EIR #41 assessed the environmental concerns of the General Plan Amendment; and, 3. That it does approve General Plan Amendment 2001-078 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as contained in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 19th day of June, 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 030 G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLG PA078. wpd 569 City Council Resolution 2001-_ General Plan Amendment 2001-078 KSL Development Corp. June 19, 2001 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 031. G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLGPA078.wpd 5�0 EXHIIBIT "A" GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-078 APPROVED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN/LAND USE 501h - I AVENUE La FL c 032 Ln z ' G 571 0 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA CHANGING THE LAND DESIGNATION FROM TOURIST COMMERCIAL TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR A 17.82 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED WITHIN THE LA QUINTA RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN, AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EISENHOWER AND AVENUE 50 CASE NO.: ZONE CHANGE 2001-101 KSL DEVELOPMENT CORP. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5th and 19"' day of June, 2001, hold duly noticed Public Hearings for KSL Development Corp. to review a Zone Change to allow Low Density Residential zoning on a 17.82 acre site at the southeast corner of Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50, within the La Quinta Resort Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings recommending approval of said Zone Change: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan, and the Land Use Map for the General Plan and surrounding development and land use designations, ensuring land use compatibility. 2. The Zone Change will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, as it has been designed to be compatible with surrounding development, and conform with the City's standards and requirements. 3. The Zone Change is compatible with the City's Zoning Ordinance in that it supports the development of single family residential homes within a primarily single family residential Specific Plan. 4. The Zone Change supports the orderly development of the City. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.PURPOSE. To rezone a portion of land generally located at the southeastern corner of Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50, known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 658-190-004, 773-020-033, 770-020-021, 773-020-034, from Village Commercial to Low Density Residential. - 033 GAWPDOCS\OrdKSLZC 101.WPD 5 7 /�, Ordinance No. _ Zone Change 2001-101 Adopted June 19, 2001 Page 2 SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL. This Zone Change has complied with the requirements of the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended) and adopted by City Council Resolution 83-68, in that the Community Development Director has determined that the proposed Zone Change will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4: POSTING. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three public places designated by Resolution of the City Council, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 19th day of June, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 034 573 G:\WPDOCS\OrdKSLZC101.WPD EXHIBIT "A" ZONE CHANGE 2001-101 APPROVED ZONING 501h ' I AVE LDR j = G Z � W G TC PROPOSED ZONING 501h • I AVENUE 035 574 RESOLUTION 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN 121-E AMENDMENT NO. 5 FOR A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING RESIDENTIAL, GOLF COURSE, AND TOURIST COMMERCIAL USES ON 622 ACRES, KNOWN AS THE LA QUINTA RESORT AND CLUB CASE NO. SP 121-E, AMENDMENT NO. 5 APPLICANT: KSL DEVELOPMENT CORP. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5th and 191h day of June, 2001, hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider Specific Plan 121-E, Amendment No. 5, to allow a mixed use development including residential, golf course and tourist commercial uses on 622 acres, generally bounded by the Santa Rosa mountains on the west, Calle Tampico on the south, Coachella Drive on the north and Desert Club (extended) on the east; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 8th day of May, 2001 and 22nd day of May, hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider Specific Plan 121-E, Amendment No. 5, to allow a mixed use development including residential, golf course and tourist commercial uses on 622 acres, generally bounded by the Santa Rosa mountains on the west, Calle Tampico on the south, Coachella Drive on the north and Desert Club (extended) on the east; and WHEREAS, said Specific Plan has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-63), in that an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #41 was prepared for Specific Plan 121-E and found that although the proposed project will have environmental impacts, all impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approving Specific Plan 121-E, Amendment No. 5: 1 . That the proposed Specific Plan 121-E, Amendment No. 5 is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan in that the proposed Low Density Residential land use designation exists in the General Plan. 2. This Amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare in that the single family residential development will occur within an existing planned community and will be integrated into that community. 036 57J G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLSP1 21 E#5.wpd City Council Resolution 2001- Specific Plan 121-E, Amendment#5 KSL Development Corp. Adopted: June 19, 2001 3. That Specific Plan 121-E, Amendment No. 5 is compatible with the existing and anticipated area development in that the project does not increase the total number of units originally intended for development within the area. 4. That the project will be provided with adequate utilities and public services to ensure public health and safety. 5. That the Specific Plan 121-E, Amendment No. 5 is consistent with the current Specific Plan approval and amendment process. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby require compliance with the Conditions of Approval for the proposed Specific Plan; 3. That it does hereby confirm the conclusion that the Addendum to EIR #41 assessed the environmental concerns of this Specific Plan; and, 4. That it does hereby approve Specific Plan 121-E, Amendment #5 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 19th day of June, 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA City of La Quinta, California G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLSP121 E#5.wpd 0 3'7 576 City Council Resolution 2001- Specific Plan 121-E, Amendment #5 KSL Development Corp. Adopted: June 19, 2001 APPROVED AS TO FORM: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 038 GAWPD0CS\CCResoKSLSP121 E#5.wpd 577 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2001- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 121-E, AMENDMENT #5 - KSL LAND DEVELOPMENT JUNE 19, 2001 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Specific Plan. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Prior to the issuance of a grading, construction or building permit, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances from the following public agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) The applicant is responsible for any requirements of the permits or clearances from those jurisdictions. If the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of said approvals prior to obtaining City approval of the plans. 3. The applicant shall dedicate or grant public and private street right of way and utility easements in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and as required by the City Engineer. 4. Applicant shall provide an easement of sufficient width to allow the construction of a retaining wall to be extended from the applicant's retaining wall adjacent to Eisenhower Drive. 5. Right of way dedications required of this development include: G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLSP121 E5COA.wpd 039 573 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2001-_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 121-E, AMENDMENT #5 - KSL LAND DEVELOPMENT JUNE 19, 2001 A. PUBLIC STREETS 1. Eisenhower Drive (Primary Arterial) - 50-foot half of the 100-foot right of way. 2. Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) - 50-foot half of the 100-foot right of way, measured from the existing improvement construction centerline. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1. Residential (Street Lots A-F): 31-foot minimum width with roll - type curb (providing minimum travel width of 28-feet, measured gutter flow -line to gutter flow -line). Right of way may be reduced to 29-feet with vertical curbs. On -street parking is prohibited provided and the applicant must make provision for ongoing enforcement of the restriction. 2. Private Gated Entry: 82-feet or as required to provide adequate egress and turn -around for non -admitted visitors, as approved by the City Engineer. 3. Emergency Access (Lot G): 25-foot. C. CULS DE SAC 1. Public or Private: Use Riverside County Standard 800 (symmetric) or 800A (offset) with 39-foot radius for vertical curbs and 41-foot radius for rolled curbs to provide travel radius of 38-feet measured gutter flow -line to gutter flow -line, or larger. 6. Right of way geometry for knuckle turns and corner cut -backs shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805 respectively unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 7. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for the existing bus turnout on Avenue 50. 8. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 040 G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLSP121 E5COA.wpd J ^ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2001-_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 121-E, AMENDMENT #5 - KSL LAND DEVELOPMENT JUNE 19, 2001 The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit. Projects disturbing 5 or more acres, or smaller projects which are part of a larger project disturbing 5 or more acres require a project -specific NPDES permit. The applicant shall submit a copy of the CWQCB acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent (N01) prior to issuance of a grading or site construction permit. The applicant shall ensure that the required Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (SWPPP) is available for inspection at the project site. 9. The applicant shall dedicate ten -foot public utility easements contiguous with and along both sides of all private streets. The easements may be reduced to five feet with the express concurrence of IID. 10. The applicant shall create perimeter setbacks and meandering walls along public rights of way as follows (listed setback depth is the average depth if meandering wall design is approved): A. Eisenhower Drive (Primary Arterial): 20-feet. B. Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial): 20-feet. The setback requirement applies to all frontage including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., meandering sidewalks) are placed on privately - owned setbacks, the applicant shall dedicate blanket easements for those purposes. 1 1 . The applicant shall dedicate easements necessary for placement of and access to utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. LANDSCAPING 12. The applicant shall provide landscaping in required setbacks, retention basins, common lots, and park areas. 13. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 041 G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLSP121 E5COA.wpd 580 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2001-_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 121-E, AMENDMENT #5 - KSL LAND DEVELOPMENT JUNE 19, 2001 The applicant shall submit plans for approval by the Community Development Department prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking is complete, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner prior to submitting for signature by the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 14. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS Prior to issuance of a grading permit or 30 days after City Council approval, whichever occurs first, the Specific Plan shall be modified as follows: 15. The words "resort residential' shall be deleted from the first paragraph of page 2.16 of the Specific Plan. 16. Common area pool and clubhouse facility shall be listed separately in Table 2, page 2.17 of the Specific Plan. 17. The Residential Development Standards Table on Page 3.10 shall be amended to read "Minimum Lot Size: 6,500 square feet not abutting golf course, 6000 square feet on the golf course, and minimum livable square footage is 1900 square feet, excluding garages. 18. The Specific Plan shall be amended to include clubhouse buildings, subject to Site Development Permit approval, in the permitted use section of Planning Area II. 19. Tandem parking in the garage shall be allowed to meet the parking requirement for four bedroom houses. 20. The landscaping palette (Table 8, page 2.59) shall be amended to include all plants listed in the "Suggested Plant Material Palette -- La Quinta Resort and Club/Esperanza Village." 21. All mitigation measures in Addendum to EIR #41 shall be incorporated into the Specific Plan by this reference. U n G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLSP121 E5COA.Wpd 581 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2001-_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 121-E, AMENDMENT #5 - KSL LAND DEVELOPMENT JUNE 19, 2001 22. Prior to final inspection of the tenth house, the permanent employee parking facilities located at Calle Tampico and Avenida Bermudas shall have been completed to the satisfaction of the City, shall be fully accessible to La Quinta Resort and Club employees, and shall have shuttle service established. 23. Planning Area III shall be allowed to have a zero lot line for swimming pools. 043 G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLSP121 E5COA.wpd 582 RESOLUTION 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT OF 65 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WITHIN THE LA QUINTA RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN, #121-E, AMENDMENT #5 CASE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-703 APPLICANT: KSL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5th and 19th day of June, 2001, hold duly noticed Public Hearings for KSL Development Corporation to allow the construction of 65 single family homes on 17.82 acres within the La Quinta Resort Specific Plan area, more particularly described as: APN's 658-190-004, 773-020-033, 770-020-021, 773-020-034 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 8th and 22nd day of May, 2001, hold duly noticed Public Hearings for KSL Development Corporation to allow the construction of 65 single family homes on 17.82 acres within the La Quinta Resort Specific Plan area; and WHEREAS, the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee for the City of La Quinta did, on the 2nd day of May, 2001 recommend approval of the proposed project, by adoption of Minute Motion 2001-023, subject to conditions of approval; WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings recommending approval of said Site Development Permit: 1. The proposed Site Development Permit is consistent with the General Plan goals, policies and programs relating to the Low Density Residential land use designation, and supports the development of a mix of residential land uses within an established Specific Plan. 2. The proposed Site Development Permit is consistent with the standards of the Zoning Ordinance and is consistent with the La Quinta Resort Specific Plan, as conditioned, which establishes development standards for the project. The project, as conditioned meets the City's standards for height, landscaping and land use. 044 G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLSDP703.wpd 583 City Council Resolution 2000- Site Development Permit 703 - KSL Land Development June 19, 2001 3. The proposed Site Development Permit will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, as it has been designed to be compatible with surrounding development, and conform with the City's standards and requirements, as conditioned. 4. The proposed Site Development Permit, as conditioned, complies with the architectural design standards for the La Quinta Resort Specific Plan (#121-E, Amendment #5), and implements the development standards and design guidelines included in that document. 5. The proposed Site Development Permit, as conditioned, is consistent with the landscaping standards and palette in the La Quinta Resort Specific Plan and implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; and 2. That it does hereby approve Site Development Permit 2001-703, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution, and subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto; and 3. That it does hereby confirm the conclusion that the Addendum to EIR #41 assessed the environmental concerns of this Specific Plan. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 19th day of June, 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 045 G:\W PDOCS\CCResoKSLSDP703.wpd 584 City Council Resolution 2000- Site Development Permit 703 - KSL Land Development June 19, 2001 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California U46 G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLSDP703.wpd 5 8 ) CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2001- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-703 JUNE 19, 2001 1. The final landscaping plan shall include the following plant sizes: Interior Street Trees Accent Trees Unit Screen Trees Perimeter/Entry Shrubs Groundcover Desertscape Ocotillo Vines 24" box minimum 24" box minimum 24;' box minimum 25' trunk height minimum 5 gal. Minimum 1 gal. Minimum 5 gal. Minimum 6' minimum 5 gal. Minimum 2. The applicant shall create perimeter setbacks and meandering walls along public rights of way as follows (listed setback depth is the average depth if meandering wall design is approved): A. Eisenhower Drive (Primary Arterial): 20-feet. B. Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial): 20-feet. The setback requirement applies to all frontage including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., meandering sidewalks) are placed on privately - owned setbacks, the applicant shall dedicate blanket easements for those purposes. 3. The perimeter wall shall be compatible with the perimeter wall for Duna La Quinta and no more than 6 feet in height, finished with a stucco finish, and articulated with pilasters at a minimum of 60 foot intervals. 4. All changes to the Specific Plan which are also included in the Site Development Permit shall be made to the latter to ensure consistency. The project proponent shall submit amended documents within 30 days of City Council approval or, issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs first, of the Specific Plan. 5. The perimeter walls along Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50 shall be constructed at the time the homes are built along either of the two streets. The Community Development Department shall determine the portion of the wall that shall be installed when building permits are issued for the clubhouse. 047 GAWPDOMCCResoKSLsdp703COA.wpd 586 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2001- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-703 JUNE 19, 2001 6. The home to be located on lot #16 shall be limited to one story, 22 feet in height. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 7. Grading and drainage plans shall be submitted to the District for review prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8. The project proponent shall construct suitable facilities to limit access to the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. 9. The project proponent shall obtain an encroachment permit from the District prior to any construction within the right of way of the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. 10. The proposed project shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 55 and 82 for sanitation service. 11. Plans for grading, landscaping and irrigation systems shall be submitted to the District for review for the purpose of ensuring efficient water management. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 12. Approved standard fire hydrants, located at each intersection and spaced 330 feet apart with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 gpm, for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi. 13. Blue dot reflectors shall be placed in the street 8 inches from centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 14. Gate entrances shall be at least two feet wider than the width of the travel lanes serving that gate. Any gate providing access from a road to a driveway shall be located at least 35 feet setback from the roadway and shall open to allow a vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic on the road. Where a one-way road with a single traffic lane provides access to a gate entrance, a 40-foot turning radius shall be used. 15. Gates shall be equipped with a rapid entry system (KNOX). Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Gate pins shall be rated with a shear pin force, not to exceed 30 pounds. Gates activated by the rapid entry system shall remain open until closed by the rapid entry system. G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLsdp703COA.wpd 587 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2001- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMM SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-703 JUNE 19, 2001 16. The applicant or developer shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. 17. Prior to final inspection of the tenth house, the permanent employee parking facilities located at Calle Tampico and Avenida Bermudas shall have been completed to the satisfaction of the City, shall be fully accessible to La Quinta Resort and Club employees, and shall have shuttle service established. 049 G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLsdp703COA.wpd 588 RESOLUTION 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBDIVISION OF 17.82 ACRES INTO 65 PARCELS AND A NUMBER OF LETTERED LOTS. CASE NO.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30125 APPLICANT: KSL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5th day of June, 2001, hold duly noticed Public Hearings for KSL Development Corporation to allow the construction of 65 single family homes on 17.82 acres within the La Quinta Resort Specific Plan area, more particularly described as: APN's: 658-190-004, 773-020-033, 773-020-021, 773-020-034 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 8th and 22nd day of May, 2001, hold duly noticed Public Hearings for KSL Development Corporation to allow the construction of 65 single family homes on 17.82 acres within the La Quinta Resort Specific Plan area; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings approving Tentative Tract Map 30125: Finding Number 1 - Consistency with General Plan: A. The property is designated Low Density Residential. The Land Use Element of the General Plan encourages differing residential developments throughout the City. The project is consistent with the goals, policies and intent of the La Quinta General Plan Land Use Element (Chapter 2) insofar as Low Density Residential development fits the character of the City's residential community. Finding Number 2 - Consistency with City Zoning Ordinance: A. The proposed development is consistent with the land uses specified in the Zoning Ordinance, as conditioned. Modifications to the City's standards, which are included in Specific Plan 121-E, Amendment #5, are justified. Finding Number 3 - Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act: A. Tentative Tract Map 30125 is subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act per Public Resources Code Section 65457(a). An Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #41 has been prepared. 050 G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLTT30125.wpd 589 City Council Resolution 2001- TTM 30125 - KSL Development Corp. Adopted: June 19, 2001 Finding Number 4 - Site Design: A. The proposed design of the subdivision conforms with the development standards found in the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, as modified in the Specific Plan. B. The site is physically suitable for the proposed land division, as the area is flat and without physical constraints, and the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with other parcels in the La Quinta Resort project. Finding_Number 5 - Site Improvements: A. Infrastructure improvements such as gas, electric, sewer and water will service the site in underground facilities as required. No adverse impacts have been identified based on letters of response from affected public agencies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby confirm the conclusion that the Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #41 assessed the environmental concerns of this Tentative Tract Map; and, 4. That it does approve Tentative Tract Map 30125 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 19th day of June, 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: IT1940 Ill In ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 051 G:\WPDO CS\CC ResoKSLTT301 2 5. wpd City Council Resolution 2001- TTM 30125 - KSL Development Corp. Adopted: June 19, 2001 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 05 G:\WPDOCS\C C ResoKSLTT301 2 5. wpd 591 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2001- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30125 JUNE 19, 2001 GENERAL 1 . The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this tentative map or any final map thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This tentative map and any final maps thereunder shall comply with the requirements and standards of § §66410 through 66499.58 of the California Government Code (the Subdivision Map Act) and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC). 3. Prior to the issuance of a grading, construction or building permit, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances from the following public agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) The applicant is responsible for any requirements of the permits or clearances from those jurisdictions. If the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of said approvals prior to obtaining City approval of the plans. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit. Projects disturbing 5 or more acres, or smaller projects which are part of a larger project disturbing 5 or more acres require a project -specific NPDES permit. The applicant shall submit a copy of the CWQCB acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent (NO[) prior to issuance of a grading or site construction permit. The applicant shall ensure that the required Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (SWPPP) is available for inspection at the project site. 053 GAWPD0CS\CCResoKSLTT30125.wod 5 9 y City Council Resolution 2001- TTM 30125 - KSL Development Corp. Adopted: June 19, 2001 4. Final maps under this tentative map shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of final map approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 5. Prior to approval of a final map, the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights required of the tentative map or otherwise necessary for construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of essential improvements. 6. The applicant shall dedicate or grant public and private street right of way and utility easements in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and as required by the City Engineer. 7. Applicant shall provide an easement of sufficient width to allow the construction of a retaining wall to be extended from the applicant's retaining wall adjacent to Eisenhower Drive. 8. Right of way dedications required of this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1 . Eisenhower Drive (Primary Arterial) - 50-foot half of the 100-foot right of way. 2. Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) - 50-foot half of the 100-foot right of way, measured from the existing improvement construction centerline. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1. Residential (Street Lots A-F): 31-foot minimum width with roll - type curb (providing minimum travel width of 28-feet, measured gutter flow -line to gutter flow -line). Right of way may be reduced to 29-feet with vertical curbs. On -street parking is prohibited provided and the applicant must make provision for ongoing enforcement of the restriction. 2. Private Gated Entry: 82-feet or as required to provide adequate egress and turn -around for non -admitted visitors, as approved by the City Engineer. (154 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso KSLTT30125.wpd 593 City Council Resolution 2001- TTM 30125 - KSL Development Corp. Adopted: June 19, 2001 3. Emergency Access (Lot H): 25-foot. C. CULS DE SAC 1. Public or Private: Use Riverside County Standard 800 (symmetric) or 800A (offset) with 39-foot radius for vertical curbs and 41-foot radius for rolled curbs to provide travel radius of 38-feet measured gutter flow -line to gutter flow -line, or larger. 9. Right of way geometry for knuckle turns and corner cut -backs shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805 respectively unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 10. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for the existing bus turnout on Avenue 50. 11. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 12. If the City Engineer determines that access rights to proposed street rights of way shown on the tentative map are necessary prior to approval of final maps dedicating the rights of way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights of way within 60 days of written request by the City. 13. The applicant shall dedicate ten -foot public utility easements contiguous with and along both sides of all private streets. The easements may be reduced to five feet with the express concurrence of IID. 14. The applicant shall create perimeter setbacks along public rights of way as follows (listed setback depth is the average depth if meandering wall design is approved): A. Eisenhower Drive (Primary Arterial): 20-feet. B. Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial): 20-feet. The setback requirement applies to all frontage including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall dedicate blanket easements for those purposes. 15. The applicant shall dedicate easements necessary for placement of and access to utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 055 G\WPDOCS\CCReso KSLTT30125.wod 594 City Council Resolution 2001- TTM 30125 - KSL Development Corp. Adopted: June 19, 2001 16. The applicant shall vacate abutter's rights of access to public streets and properties from all frontage along the streets and properties except access points shown on the approved tentative map. 17. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements or written permission, as appropriate, from owners of any abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments are to occur. 18. If the applicant proposes vacation or abandonment of any existing rights of way or access easements which will diminish access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall provide approved alternate rights of way or access easements to those properties or notarized letters of consent from the property owners. 19. The applicant shall cause no easements to be granted or recorded over any portion of this property between the date of approval of this tentative map by the City Council and the date of recording of any final map(s) covering the same portion of the property unless such easements are approved by the City Engineer. FINAL MAP(S) AND PARCEL MAP(S) 20. Prior to approval of a final map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete map, as approved by the City's map checker, on storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu items so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. If the map was not produced in AutoCad or a file format which can be converted to AutoCad, the City Engineer may accept raster -image files of the map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 21. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and landscape architects, as appropriate. Plans shall be submitted on 24" x 36" media in the categories of "Rough Grading," "Precise Grading," "Streets & Drainage," and "Landscaping." Precise grading plans shall 056 G:\WPDOCS\CCReSOKSLTT30125.wpd 595 9C City Council Resolution 2001- TTM 30125 - KSL Development Corp. Adopted: June 19, 2001 have signature blocks for Community Development Director and the Building Official. All other plans shall have signature blocks for the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until they are signed. "Streets and Drainage" plans shall normally include signals, sidewalks, bike paths, entry drives, gates, and parking lots. "Landscaping" plans shall normally include irrigation improvements, landscape lighting and entry monuments. "Precise Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls. Plans for improvements not listed above shall be in formats approved by the City Engineer. 22. The City may maintain standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee established by City Resolution, the applicant may acquire standard plan and/or detail sheets from the City. 23. When final plans are approved by the City, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete, approved plans on storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu items so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. At the completion of construction and prior to final acceptance of improvements, the applicant shall update the files to reflect as -constructed conditions. If the plans were not produced in AutoCad or a file format which can be converted to AutoCad, the City Engineer may accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 24. Depending on the timing of development of the lots or parcels created by this map and the status of off -site improvements at that time, the subdivider may be required to construct improvements, to construct additional improvements subject to reimbursement by others, to reimburse others who construct improvements that are obligations of this map, to secure the cost of the improvements for future construction by others, or a combination of these methods. In the event that any of the improvements required herein are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, at the time of approval of a map or other development or building permit, reimburse the City for the cost of those improvements. 057 G:\WPDOCS\CCReSOKSLTT30125.wpd 596 City Council Resolution 2001- TTM 30125 - KSL Development Corp. Adopted: June 19, 2001 25. The applicant shall construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations, or furnish an executed, secured agreement to construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations required by the City prior to approval of a final map or parcel map or issuance of a certificate of compliance for a waived parcel map. For secured agreements, security provided, and the release thereof, shall conform with Chapter 13, LQMC. Improvements to be made or agreed to shall include removal of any existing structures or obstructions which are not part of the proposed improvements. 26. If improvements are secured, the applicant shall provide estimates of improvement costs for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Estimates shall comply with the schedule of unit costs adopted by City resolution or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's schedule, estimates shall meet the approval of the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies. Security is not required for telephone, gas, or T.V. cable improvements. However, development -wide improvements shall not be agendized for final acceptance until the City receives confirmation from the telephone authority that the applicant has met all requirements for telephone service to lots within the development. 27. If improvements are phased with multiple final maps or other administrative approvals (e.g., Site Development Permits), off -site improvements and common improvements (e.g., retention basins, perimeter walls & landscaping, gates) shall be constructed or secured prior to approval of the first phase unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each phase shall be completed and satisfied prior to completion of homes or occupancy of permanent buildings within the phase and subsequent phases unless a construction phasing plan is approved by the City Engineer. The perimeter walls along Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50 shall be constructed at the time the homes are built along either of the two streets. The Community Development Department shall determine the portion of the wall that shall be installed when building permits are issued for the clubhouse 28. If the applicant fails to construct improvements or satisfy obligations in a timely manner or as specified in an approved phasing plan or in an improvement agreement, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING (158 G:AWPDOCSTCResoKSLTT30125.wpd 597 City Council Resolution 2001- TTM 30125 - KSL Development Corp. Adopted: June 19, 2001 29. Provide 2-foot wide flat areas between Lots 1-5 and 55-61 and the water features adjacent to said lots for pedestrian traffic. The pedestrian walking area should be adjacent to the lot lines. 30. Slopes adjacent to the golf course water features shall not exceed 3:1. 31. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, applicant shall submit written verification of the Water Quality Control Board's acceptance of applicant's filing of the Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with State and Federal NPDES regulations. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall furnish a preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report and an approved grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer. The grading plan shall conform with the recommendations of the soils report and be certified as adequate by a soils engineer or engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on final maps (if any are required of this development) that a soils report has been prepared pursuant to Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code. 33. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 34. Prior to occupation of the project site for construction purposes, the applicant shall submit and receive approval of a Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the provisions of the permit. 35. The applicant shall maintain graded, undeveloped land to prevent wind and water erosion of soils. The land shall be planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. 36. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide building pad certifications stamped and signed by qualified engineers or surveyors. For each pad, the certification shall list the approved elevation, the actual elevation, the difference between the two, if any, and pad compaction. The data shall be organized by lot number and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 059 G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLTT30125.wpd 598 City Council Resolution 2001- TTM 30125 - KSL Development Corp. Adopted: June 19, 2001 37. Stormwater falling on site during the peak 24-hour period of a 100-year storm (the design storm) shall be retained within the development unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. 38. Stormwater shall normally be retained in the golf course water features. 39. Storm flow in excess of retention capacity shall be routed through a designated, unimpeded overflow outlet to the historic drainage relief route. 40. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be retained on site or passed through to the overflow outlet. 41. Nuisance water shall be retained on site and disposed of in an approved method. 42. If the applicant proposes discharge of stormwater directly or indirectly to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, the applicant shall indemnify the City from the costs of any sampling and testing of the development's drainage discharge which may be required under the City's NPDES Permit or other City - or area -wide pollution prevention program, and for any other obligations and/or expenses which may arise from such discharge. The indemnification shall be executed and furnished to the City prior to issuance of any grading, construction or building permit and shall be binding on all heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors in interest in the land within this tentative map excepting therefrom those portions required to be dedicated or deeded for public use. The form of the indemnification shall be acceptable to the City Attorney. If such discharge is approved for this development, the applicant shall make provisions in the CC&Rs for meeting these potential obligations. UTILITIES 43. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within the right of way and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electrical vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 44. Utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing, improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of trench compaction for approval of the City Engineer. 060 G:\WPDO CS\CCReso KSLTT30125.wpd 59`� City Council Resolution 2001- TTM 30125 - KSL Development Corp. Adopted: June 19, 2001 REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS 45. Existing aerial lines within or adjacent to the proposed development and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. Power lines exceeding 34.5 kv are exempt from this requirement. 46. Provide safety railing along the top of the retaining wall adjacent to Lot 53. Safety railing shall be capable of providing for the safety of pedestrians and occupants of golf carts. 47. The applicant shall install the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. (Public street improvements shall conform with the City's General Plan in effect at the time of construction.) A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1. Eisenhower Drive (Primary Arterial)- Applicant shall comply with the approved Condition of Approval, No. 10, Tentative Parcel Map 28334, which is worded as follows: "As a condition of any final map or other land action allowing development of any portion of this property, the following minimum street improvements shall be constructed to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses: Eisenhower Drive (Primary Arterial) - 76' between curb faces with a 12' raised median along the full frontage of this parcel map." Condition to be amended to read: Applicant shall construct half street improvement in compliance with the General Plan along the full frontage of Eisenhower, comprising that portion of Tentative Parcel Map 28334 and Tentative Tract Map 30125, to a point 60- feet north of the southwest property corner of Tract 28334, Parcel 3. Applicant shall construct six foot meandering sidewalk and 12- foot raised center median. Applicant will be reimbursed for the cost of the median construction from the Transportation DIF in an amount not to exceed the budget allowance for this median construction. Applicant shall enter a secured agreement for the cost of the half street improvement from the point 60-feet north of the southwest property corner of Tract 28334, Parcel 3, to the north terminus of the future Eisenhower Drive bridge improvement. U6] G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLTT30125. wpd 6 0 0 City Council Resolution 2001- TTM 30125 - KSL Development Corp. Adopted: June 19, 2001 2. Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) - Construct median modification to allow left turn from Ave. 50. Construct 8-foot meandering sidewalk from eastern end of bus shelter to the eastern property boundary. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1. Residential (Lots A-F): 28-foot travel width, minimum, measured gutter flow -line to gutter flow -line. On -street parking shall be prohibited and applicant will provide for perpetual enforcement of the restriction by the homeowner's association. 2. Emergency Access (Lot H): Minimum 20-foot travel width, measured gutter flow -line to gutter flow -line. C. CULS DE SAC Use Riverside County Standard 800 (symmetric) or 800A (offset) with 38-foot curb radius, measured gutter flow -line to gutter flow - line. 48. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 49 The applicant may be required to extend improvements beyond development boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 50. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC, adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, and as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 51. Knuckle turns and corner cut -backs shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805 respectively unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 52. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations which convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue for street sweeping. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the 116') G:\WPDOCS\CCReSOKSLTT30125.wpd 601 n1 City Council Resolution 2001- TTM 30125 - KSL Development Corp. Adopted: June 19, 2001 lip at the flowline shall be vertical (1/8" batter) and a minimum of 0.1' in height. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to normal curbing prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 53. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using Caltrans' design procedure (20-year life) and site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows (or approved equivalents for alternate materials): Residential 3.0" a.c./4.50" c.a.b. Collector 4.0"/5.00" Secondary Arterial 4.0"/6.00" Primary Arterial 4.5"/6.00" Major Arterial 5.5"/6.50" The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 54. The City will conduct final inspections of homes and other habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the tract or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPING 55. The applicant shall provide landscaping in required setbacks, retention basins, common lots, and park areas. 56. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit plans for approval by the Community Development Department prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan) s ,� checking is complete, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and th� G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLTT30125. wpd 6 0 21 City Council Resolution 2001- TTM 30125 - KSL Development Corp. Adopted: June 19, 2001 Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner prior to submitting for signature by the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 57. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. PUBLIC SERVICES 58. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by Sunline Transit and approved by the City Engineer. QUALITY ASSURANCE 59. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures which meet the approval of the City Engineer. 60. The applicant shall employ or retain qualified civil engineers, geotechnical engineers, surveyors, or other appropriate professionals to provide sufficient construction supervision to be able to furnish and sign accurate record drawings. 61. The applicant shall arrange and bear the cost of measurement, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program but required by the City as evidence that construction materials and methods comply with plans, specifications and applicable regulations. 62. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were signed by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As - Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the CAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City to reflect as -constructed conditions. MAINTENANCE 63. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. The applicant shall maintain required public improvements until expressly released from this responsibility by the appropriate public agency. 064 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso KSLTT30125.wpd 603 City Council Resolution 2001- TTM 30125 - KSL Development Corp. Adopted: June 19, 2001 FEES AND DEPOSITS 64. The applicant shall pay the City's established fees for plan checking and construction inspection. Fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan checking and permits. 65. Prior to approval of a final map or completion of any approval process for modification of boundaries of the property or lots subject to these conditions, the applicant shall process a reapportionment of any bonded assessment(s) against the property and pay the cost of the reapportionment. 66. Prior to final inspection of the tenth house, the permanent employee parking facilities located at Calle Tampico and Avenida Bermudas shall have been completed to the satisfaction of the City, shall be fully accessible to La Quinta Resort and Club employees, and shall have shuttle service established. (1611 G:\WPDOCS\CCResoKSLTT30125.wpd 604 Twy,' 4 laQ" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 19, 2001 Public Hearing for an Amendment to Tentative Tract Map 29858 (Phase 2) Reconfiguring Seven Acres at the Southeast Corner of the Tract into 18 Single Family and Other Common Lots Located Approximately 800 Feet South of Avenue 50 and West of Jefferson Street within Specific Plan 2000- 048 Applicant: RJT Homes, LLC RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: 2 PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract Map 29858 (Amendment #1), subject to findings and conditions. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Project History Specific Plan 2000-048: On November 21, 2000, the City Council adopted Palmilla Specific Plan, which provides design guidelines and development standards for the future development of 178 single family houses utilizing detached or attached construction methods on 73 acres. The project is designed around a series of water and open space elements. Tentative Tract Map 29858: City Council Resolution 2000-153 approved a mix of 90 single family attached residences and 72 detached single family homes on lots ranging from 8,208 square feet to 21,136 square feet for the site (Attachment #1). The average lot size for the attached product was 10,446 square feet and 15,534 square 605 SR CC Tr.Palmilla-2 P-Greg T.;R 5/24 (None) and 6/11 Tr. 30136 Form feet for the detached product. The attached product is located on the eastern half of the property, closest to Jefferson Street. Since approval by the City Council on November 21, 2000, the developer has reduced the number of residential lots to 159 from 162. Tract 29858-1, consisting of 141 single family lots, is pending recordation. A clearing and grubbing permit was issued by the City to the developer in April. Site Development Permit 2001-694: On March 27, 2001, the Planning Commission, on a 5-0 vote, adopted Minute Motion 2001-008 approving six prototype housing units in the Palmilla development ranging from 2,894 square feet to over 4,000 square feet. Project Request This proposed Amendment to the tentative tract map proposes to reconfigure the southeast corner of the Tract consisting of: (1) 18 single family residential lots ranging in size from 7,877 to over 10,880 square feet and other miscellaneous common lots, (2) single family lots measuring 70 feet in width by 120 feet in depth, and (3) a 1 .6 acre retention basin (Lot "D") along Jefferson Street (Attachment #2). The new tract design reduces the number of development and flag lots, cul-de-sac streets, and reconfigures rear yard common open space areas. Planning Commission Review On May 22, 2001, the Planning Commission, on a 5-0 vote, adopted Resolution 2001- 086, recommending to the City Council approval of the map revision request, subject to findings and conditions (Attachment #3). Public Notice This project was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on June 8, 2001, and mailed to all property owners within 500-feet of the site. To date, no comments have been received from adjacent property owners. Any written comments received will be handed out at the meeting. Agency Comments A copy of this request has been sent to all applicable public agencies and City Departments. All written comments received are on file with the Community Development Department. Applicable comments received have been included in the recommended Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The findings necessary to approve this request can be made, and are included in the attached Resolution. Please note two infrastructure conditions (Numbers 35 and 44) have been modified by the Public Works Department and the applicant was notified. 606 SR CC Tr.Palmilla-2 P-Greg T.;R 5/24 (None) and 6/11 Tr. 30136 Form The alternatives available to the City Council include: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract Map 29858 (Amendment #1), subject to findings and conditions; or 2. Do not approve the above -mentioned Resolution; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Approved for submission by: Z Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . TTM 29858 Original 2. TTM 29858, Amendment #1 3. May 22, 2001 Planning Commission Minutes (Excerpt) 003 SR CC Tr.Palmilla-2 P-Greg T.;R 5/24 (None) and 6/11 C O ry Tr. 30136 Form U RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29858 RECONFIGURING SEVEN ACRES IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE TRACT INTO 18 RESIDENTIAL AND OTHER COMMON LOTS CASE NO.: TTM 29858, AMENDMENT #1 APPLICANT: RJT HOMES, LLC WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 191h day of June, 2001, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for RJT Homes for review of a Tentative Tract Map Amendment reconfiguring seven acres into 18 residential and common lots located approximately 800 feet south of Avenue 50 and west of Jefferson Street, more particularly described as: APN: 772-050-007 and 772-050-008 (Portions) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 22"d day of May, 2001, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for RJT Homes to consider the request, and on a 5-0, adopted Resolution 2001-086, recommending to the City Council approval, subject to conditions. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 211 day of November, 2000, adopt Resolution 2000-153 approving TTM 29858 which allowed 162 residential lots on 73 acres located at the southwest corner of 50th Avenue and Jefferson Street; and WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (EA 2000-401) was certified by the City Council on the 21 It day of November, 2000 (Resolution 2000-150), for the Palmilla development, including Tentative Tract Map 29858. No changed circumstances or conditions and no new information has been provided that would trigger the preparation of a subsequent Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings for approval of Tentative Tract Map 29858 (Amendment #1) as required by Section 13.12.130 of the Subdivision Ordinance: ResoccRJT 29858; Greg T./P - 004 " i Resolution No. 2001- Tentative Tract Map 29858, Amendment #1 RJT Homes, LLC June 19,2001 Page 2 The Tentative Tract Map Amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan, and the Land Use Map for the General Plan and in that the number of residential lots in Tract 29858 has been reduced thereby lowering the density from 2.43 dwelling units per acre to 2.17 dwelling units per acre. 2. The Tentative Tract Map Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, as it has been designed to be compatible with surrounding developments and other portions of Tract 29858, and conform with the City's standards and requirements, as conditioned. 3. The Tentative Tract Map Amendment is compatible with the City's Zoning Ordinance and Specific Plan 2000-048 in that lot configuration sizes are in compliance with the Code requirements. 4. Development of the Tentative Tract Map Amendment is compatible with the parcels on which it is proposed, and surrounding land uses as an extension of existing residential uses in the vicinity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby require compliance with those mitigation measures required in Environmental Assessment 2000-401 (City Council Resolution 2000-150); and 3. That it does hereby approve Tentative Tract Map 29858 (Amendment #1) for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. ResoccRJT 29858; Greg T./P 005 609 Resolution No. 2001- Tentative Tract Map 29858, Amendment #1 RJT Homes, LLC June 19, 2001 Page 3 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on the 1 gch day of June, 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CIVIC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 006 610 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29858, AMENDMENT #1 (PALMILLA) RJT HOMES, LLC JUNE 19, 2001 GENERAL 1 . The subdivider agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this tentative map or any final map thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Prior to the issuance of a grading, construction or building permit, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances from the following Departments and public agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) The applicant is responsible for any requirements of the permits or clearances from those jurisdictions. If the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of said approvals prior to obtaining City approval of the plans. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit. For projects requiring project -specific NPDES construction permits, the applicant shall submit a copy of the CWQCB acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent prior to issuance of a PAGREG\Cond cc TT29858-2 Palmillia.wpd Page 1 of 14 - 00 611 Resolution No. 2001- Conditions of Approval- Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29858, Amendment #1 RJT Homes June 19, 2001 Page 2 grading or site construction permit. The applicant shall ensure that the required Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan is available for inspection at the project site. 3. This Map approval shall expire and become null and void on June 19, 2003, unless an extension of time is granted according to the requirements of Section 13.12.150 of the Subdivision Ordinance. PROPERTY RIGHTS 4. Prior to approval of any future final tract map(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights required of future tentative map(s) or otherwise necessary for construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of essential improvements. 5. The applicant shall dedicate or grant public and private street right of way and utility easements in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and as required by the City Engineer. 6. Right of way dedications required of this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1 . 50th Avenue (Primary Arterial) - no additional dedication required. 2. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) - no additional dedication required. B. PRIVATE STREETS Residential: 31-foot width. On -street parking is prohibited and provisions shall be made for adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors. PAGREG\Cond cc TT29858-2 Palmillia.wpd Page 2 of 14 612 Resolution No. 2001- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29858, Amendment #1 RJT Homes June 19, 2001 Page 3 The CC&R's shall contain language requiring the Homeowner's Association to provide for ongoing enforcement of the restrictions. C. CULS DE SAC Use Riverside County Standard 800 (symmetric) or 800A (offset) with 39.5-foot radius, or larger. 7. Right of way geometry for knuckle turns and corner cutbacks shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805 respectively unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 8. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 9. The applicant shall dedicate ten -foot public utility easements contiguous with and along both sides of all private streets. The easements may be reduced to five feet with the express concurrence of IID. 10. The applicant shall create perimeter setbacks along public rights of way as follows (listed setback depth is the average depth if meandering wall design is approved): A. 50t' Avenue - 20-feet B. Jefferson Street - 20-feet The setback requirement applies to all frontage including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall dedicate blanket easements for those purposes. P:\GREG\Cond cc TT29858-2 Palmillia.wpd Page 3 of 14 009 613 Resolution No. 2001- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29858, Amendment #1 RJT Homes June 19, 2001 Page 4 11. The applicant shall dedicate easements necessary for placement of and access to utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 12. The applicant shall vacate abutter's rights of access to public streets and properties from all frontage along the streets and properties except access points shown on the approved Specific Plan. 13. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements or written permission, as appropriate, from owners of any abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments are to occur. 14. If the applicant proposes vacation or abandonment of any existing rights of way or access easements which will diminish access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall provide approved alternate rights of way or access easements to those properties or notarized letters of consent from the property owners. GRADING 15. This development shall comply with Chapter 8.11 of the LQMC (Flood Hazard Regulations). If any portion of any proposed building lot in the development is or may be located within a flood hazard area as identified on the City's Flood Insurance Rate Maps, the development shall be graded to ensure that all floors and exterior fill (at the foundation) are above the level of the project (100-year) flood and building pads are compacted to 95% Proctor Density as required in Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 65.5(a) (6). Prior to issuance of building permits for lots which are so located, the applicant shall furnish certifications as required by FEMA that the above conditions have been met. 16. Prior to issuance of any grading permit(s), the applicant shall furnish a preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report and an approved grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer. The grading plan shall conform with the recommendations of the soils report and be certified as adequate by a soils engineer or engineering geologist. P:\GREG\Cond cc TT29858-2 Palmillia.wpd ..- 010 Page 4 of 14 614 Resolution No. 2001- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29858, Amendment N1 RJT Homes June 19, 2001 Page 5 17. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 18. The applicant shall endeavor to minimize differences in elevation at abutting properties and between separate tracts and lots within this development. Building pad elevations on contiguous lots shall not differ by more than three feet except for lots within a tract or parcel map, but not sharing common street frontage, where the differential shall not exceed five feet. The limits given in this condition and the previous condition are not entitlements and more restrictive limits may be imposed in the map approval or plan checking process. If compliance with the limits is impractical, however, the City will consider alternatives which minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 19. Prior to occupation of the project site for construction purposes, the applicant shall submit and receive approval of a fugitive dust control plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. The Applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the city, in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the provisions of the permit. 20. The applicant shall maintain graded, undeveloped land to prevent wind and water erosion of soils. The land shall be planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. 21. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide building pad certifications stamped and signed by qualified engineers or surveyors. For each pad, the certification shall list the approved elevation, the actual elevation, the difference between the two, if any, and pad compaction. The data shall be organized by lot number and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03 and the following: 01] P:\GREG\Cond cc TT29858-2 Palmillia.wpd rage 5 of 14 615 Resolution No. 2001- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29858, Amendment #1 RJT Homes June 19, 2001 Page 6 22. Stormwater falling on site during the peak 24-hour period of a 100-year storm (the design storm) shall be retained within the development unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. 23. Stormwater shall normally be retained in common retention basins. Individual - lot basins or other retention schemes may be approved by the City Engineer for lots 2% acres in size or larger or where the use of common retention is impracticable. If individual -lot retention is approved, the applicant shall meet the individual -lot retention provisions of Chapter 13.24, LQMC. 24. Storm flow in excess of retention capacity shall be routed through a designated, unimpeded overflow outlet to the historic drainage relief route. 25. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be retained on site or passed through to the overflow outlet. 26. Retention facility design shall be based on site -specific percolation data which shall be submitted for checking with the retention facility plans. The design percolation rate shall not exceed two inches per hour. 27. Retention basin slopes shall not exceed 3:1 . Maximum retention depth shall be six feet for common basins and two feet for individual -lot retention. 28. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. In residential developments, nuisance water shall be disposed of in a trickling sand filter and leachfield approved by the City Engineer. The sand filter and leechfield shall be designed to contain surges of 3 gph/1,000 sq. ft. (of landscape area) and infiltrate 5 gpd/1,000 sq. ft. 29. In developments for which security will be provided by public safety entities (e.g., the La Quinta Safety Department or the Riverside County Sheriff's Department), retention basins shall be visible from adjacent street(s)• No fence or wall shall be constructed around basins unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 012 P:\GREG\Cond cc TT29858-2 Palmillia.wpd Page 6 of 14 616 Resolution No. 2001- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29858, Amendment #1 RJT Homes June 19, 2001 Page 7 30. If the applicant proposes discharge of stormwater directly or indirectly to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, the applicant shall indemnify the City from the costs of any sampling and testing of the development's drainage discharge which may be required under the City's NPDES Permit or other City - or area -wide pollution prevention program, and for any other obligations and/or expenses which may arise from such discharge. The indemnification shall be executed and furnished to the City prior to issuance of any grading, construction or building permit and shall be binding on all heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors in interest in the land within this tentative map excepting therefrom those portions required to be dedicated or deeded for public use. The form of the indemnification shall be acceptable to the City Attorney. If such discharge is approved for this development, the applicant shall make provisions in the CC&R's for meeting these potential obligations. 31. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. UTILITIES 32. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within the right of way and all aboveground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electrical vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 33. Utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing, improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of trench compaction for approval of the City Engineer. 34. Existing aerial lines within or adjacent to the proposed development and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground, unless otherwise allowed by General Plan Amendment 2000-073. Power lines exceeding 34.5 Kv are exempt from this requirement. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 35. The applicant shall install the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. (Public street improvements shall conform with the City's General Plan in effect at the time of construction.) 013 P:\GREG\Cond cc TT29858-2 Palmillia.wpd Page 7 of 14 S 1 1 Resolution No. 2001- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29858, Amendment #1 RJT Homes June 19, 2001 Page 8 A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1 . Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial; 100' R/W option): Widen south side of street along all frontage adjacent to the tract boundary. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. Other significant new improvements required for installation in, or adjacent, to the subject right of way include: (a) 6-foot wide meandering sidewalk (b) 1 2-foot wide landscaped median from west tract boundary to a point 1,050 feet west of the Jefferson Street centerline. (c) Traffic signal at the project's main entry when warrants are met. Applicant is responsible for 50% of cost to design and install traffic signal if complementing cost share from development on other side of street is available at time signal is required. If complementing share is not available, Applicant shall pay 100% of cost to design and install signal at "T" intersection. If, however, the Applicant's development progress trails that of the developer on the other side and the other developer has installed a "T" intersection signal serving the other side, Applicant shall construct the fourth leg to the intersection and modify the existing signal at own expense. The landscape median improvement is eligible for reimbursement from the City's Development Impact Fee fund in accordance with policies established for that program. 2. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial): a. Applicant shall pay cash fee to reimburse City for street improvements made to applicant's frontage through the City's Capital Improvement Program. Reimbursement amount shall cover all costs related to installing curb, gutter and outside 20 feet of roadway paving; the reimbursement P:\GREG\Cond cc TT29858-2 Palmillia.wpd 014 Page 8 of 14 618 Resolution No. 2001- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29858, Amendment #1 RJT Homes June 19, 2001 Page 9 amount shall be reduced by the percentage of non -City funds expended on the Jefferson Street Widening project. b. Applicant shall pay cash fee to reimburse City for traffic signal at the Jefferson/Avenue 50 intersection. The cash fee shall cover 6.25% of cost to design and install the signal (25% of a quarter -signal share was not funded by Measure A). C. Applicant shall install 6-foot wide meandering sidewalk along the property frontage. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1. On -site streets: A. Two -Way Traffic: construct 28-foot wide full -width improvements (measured from gutter flowline to gutter flowline) within the 31-foot right of way. All on -site streets shall be constructed with "wedge" type curb design as approved by the City Engineer. B. One -Way Traffic: the following streets shall be designated as one-way travel only: Lot D: construct minimum 20-foot wide full -width improvements (measured from gutter flowline to gutter flowline) within a minimum 23-foot right of way. Street shall be constructed with "wedge" type curb design as approved by the City Engineer. ii. Lots C and G: construct minimum 16-foot wide full - width improvements (measured from gutter flowline to gutter flowline) within a minimum 19-foot right of way. Street shall be constructed with "wedge" type curb design as approved by the City Engineer. C. Cul-de-Sacs: All cul-de-sac bulbs which contain raised landscaped islands shall be designated as "One -Way" and applicant shall construct minimum 20-foot wide full -width 015 P:\GREG\Cond cc TT29858-2 Palmillia.wpd Page 9 of 14 619 Resolution No. 2001- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29858, Amendment #1 RJT Homes June 19, 2001 Page 10 improvements (measured from gutter flowline to gutter flowline) within a minimum 23-foot right of way. Construct a "wedge" type curb design as approved by the City Engineer. D. Lot R: provide for two-way traffic by constructing 28-foot wide full -width improvements (measured from gutter flowline to gutter flowline) within a 31-foot right of way. Street shall be constructed with "wedge" type curb design as approved by the City Engineer. A minimum 25-foot wide "hammerhead" turn around area shall be constructed adjacent to Lot 85. E. Lot U: provide for two-way traffic by constructing minimum 22-foot wide full -width improvements (measured from gutter flowline to gutter flowline) within a minimum 25-foot right of way. Street shall be constructed with "wedge" type curb design as approved by the City Engineer. A minimum 25-foot wide "hammerhead" turn around area shall be constructed adjacent to Lot 134 and Lake Lot Z. 2. All on -street parking is prohibited and the applicant shall be required to provide for the perpetual enforcement of the restriction by the Homeowners' Association. Guest parking by permit only and enforced by the Homeowners' Association is allowed only in designated off-street parking areas. C. CULS DE SAC - Use Riverside County Standard 800 (symmetric) or 800A (offset), with 38-foot curb radius. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, turn knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, and other features contained in the approved construction plans may warrant additional street widths as determined by the City Engineer. 36. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 016 Eno P:\GREG\Cond cc TT29858-2 Palmillia.wpd Page 10 of 14 Resolution No. 2001- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29858, Amendment #1 RJT Homes June 19, 2001 Page 11 37. The applicant may be required to extend improvements beyond development boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 38. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC, adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, and as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 39. Knuckle turns and corner cutbacks shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805 respectively unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 40. Public streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations which convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue for street sweeping. Onsite private streets shall have a wedge curb, the design of which shall be approved by the City Engineer. The lip of the wedge curb at the flowline shall be vertical (1/8" batter) and a minimum of 0.1' in height. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to normal curbing prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 41. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using Caltrans' design procedure (20-year life) and site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows (or approved equivalents for alternate materials): Residential & Parking Areas 3.0" a.c./4.50" c.a.b. Collector 4.0"/5.00" Secondary Arterial 4.0"/6.00" Primary Arterial 4.5"/6.00" Major Arterial 5.5"/6.50" 42. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current 017 P:\GREG\Cond cc TT29858-2 Palmillia.wpd Page 11 of 14 6 2. 1 Resolution No. 2001- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29858, Amendment #1 RJT Homes June 19, 2001 Page 12 production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 43. The City will conduct final inspections of homes and other habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the project or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. 44. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. 50th Avenue - Main project entry, to be located approximately 1,250 feet west of the centerline of Jefferson Street. No restrictions applied to turning movements at this location. B. 50th Avenue - Emergency access entry (20-foot wide) from the end of the cul-de-sac in "B" Street, to be located approximately 2,400 feet west of the centerline of Jefferson Street. This point of entry will be restricted to right -turn movements only. C. Jefferson Street - Secondary project entry, to be located approximately 600 feet south of the centerline of 50t" Avenue. This point of entry will be restricted to right -turn movements, and a left -turn into the project if the applicant desires to construct an appropriately designed opening in the median island. LANDSCAPING 45. The applicant shall provide landscaping in required setbacks, retention basins, common lots, and park areas. 46. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. P:\GREG\Cond cc TT29858-2 Palmillia.wpd 018 Page 12 of 14 C rl 7 Resolution No. 2001- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29858, Amendment #1 RJT Homes June 19, 2001 Page 13 The applicant shall submit plans for approval by the Community Development Department prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking is complete, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner prior to submitting for signature by the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 47. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. 48. A 6-foot sidewalk shall be constructed along 50tn Avenue and also along Jefferson Street. The sidewalk shall meander within the 32-foot Right -of -Way and setback. PUBLIC SERVICES 49. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by Sunline Transit and approved by the City Engineer. MAINTENANCE 50. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. The applicant shall maintain required public improvements until expressly released from this responsibility by the appropriate public agency. FEES AND DEPOSITS 51. The applicant shall pay the City's established fees for plan checking and construction inspection. Fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan checking and permits. MISCELLANEOUS 52. The project proponent shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the Environmental Assessment 2000-401 . P:\GREG\Cond cc TT29858-2 Palmillia.wpd Page 13 off 1.A 623 Resolution No. 2001- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29858, Amendment #1 RJT Homes June 19, 2001 Page 14 53. Lot 12 shall have a minimum frontage width of 35 feet to comply with Table 9- 2 of the Zoning Ordinance. DOMESTIC WATER AND SANITARY SEWER 54. Landscaping, irrigation and grading plans shall be submitted to CVWD for review and approval. 55. All plans for domestic water connections to existing CVWD lines shall be submitted to the District for review and approval. FIRE DEPARTMENT 56. All water mains and fire hydrants required fire flows shall be constructed in accordance with the appropriate sections of CVWD Std. W-33, subject to the approval by the Riverside County Fire Department. 57. The minimum dimensions for fire apparatus access roads entering and exiting this project shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet in each direction and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13'-6". Parking is permitted on one side of roadways with a minimum width of 25 feet. Parking is permitted on both sides of roadways with a minimum width of 36 feet. 58. All interior fire apparatus access roads shall be a minimum of 20 feet unobstructed width and an unobstructed vertical clearance of 13'-6". Any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of any building shall be located within 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. 59. Gate entrance/exit openings shall be not less than 15 feet in width. All gates shall be located at least 40'-0" from the roadway and shall open to allow a vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic on the road. Gates shall have either a secondary power supply or an approved manual means to release mechanical control of the gate in the event of loss of primary power. 60. The maximum dead-end street length is limited to 1,320 feet for areas not located in a designated high fire hazard zone. A secondary access roadway is typically provided when such a condition exists. 61. Cul-de-sacs shall have a minimum outside radius of 38 feet to face of curb with a minimum inside radius of 26 feet to islands or center landscape features. The entire radius of 38 feet is required to properly turn fire department vehicles. Vehicle parking along the curb should be prohibited when the minimum radius is used. P:\GREG\Cond cc TT29858-2 Palmilliamlod Page 14 of 1U 2 0 Attachment I 1255 9,828 SF 129 0 yr 9= SF 00 I 11" 31M 31.8 186, 9.415 SF_ 148 i2 1 9 10.Z44 SF 11,775 SF bZ 107- 150 11,451 SF FA 136 SF 12.417 SF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 29858 022 4a CO LO 00 N d Z H U H a Lou CD W aaaaacaa assess a,,:y 9yy ea 1!! • � $ asy5i9si ,j gp iC g �S i 91i a i 9 104 i �991 � � �Y a ai�9SSr�I �i4559 II 7�19i ia�8�� ��� Attachment 2 r ' 9 , 2 62E Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 Attachment 3 b. CondiXDepartme d that the esign and materials will be compthe D a Quinta perimeter wall. C. Condieter walls along Eisenhower Drive and Aa constructed at the time the homes are bither the two streets. The Community Develpartme all determine the portion of the wall tinstalled building permits are issued for the. D Tentative Tract Map 29858; a request of RJT Homes for review of an amendment to reconfigure seven acres in the southeast corner of the tract into 18 single family and other common lots located approximately 800 feet south of Avenue 50 and west of Jefferson Street, within Palmilla Specific Plan. 1. Chairman Robbins opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Robbins asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to clarify the number of houses to be built in each phase. Staff clarified the plan was referring to the size of the homes not the number of houses. Commissioner Tyler asked if this change had any affect on the water efficiency issue. Staff stated no. 3. Chairman Robbins questioned why Lot "D" on the legend is called out as a lake lot and yet Lot "D" on the map is listed as a landscape lot. Mr. Chris Bergh, MDS Consulting representing the applicant, stated it is a misprint. They should be reversed. 4. Chairman Robbins asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Chris Bergh was available for any questions. 5. There being no questions of the applicant, nor any other public comment, Chairman Robbins closed the public participation portion of the hearing and asked if there was any Commission discussion. 6. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioner Abels/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-086 recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 29858, Amendment #1, as recommended. f G:\WPDOCS\PC5-22-01.wpd 14 `)24 C :'.1 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Chairman Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Abets, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and NOES: None. ABSENT: None. D. Conditional Use Permit 2001-058 and Site Development Permit 2001- 693 a re uest of La Quinta Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses to allow the a and review of development plans for a church facility on 2.39 acres ated on the east side of Dune Palms Road, between the Coachella Val Storm Water Channel and Westward Ho Drive. 1. Chairman FVbins opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. ff informed the Commission that the applicant had requested a coR I to July 10, 2001, to allow time to revise their plans per th rchitecture and Landscape Review Committee recommendations. 2. Chairman Robbins as if there was a motion to continue Conditional Use Permit 01-058 and Site Development Permit 2001-693. It was mo and second by Commissioners Tyler/Abets to continue Con nal Use Permit 2001-058 and Site Development Permit 2001-69 as recommended. Unanimously approved. E. nvironmental Assessment 2001-41 - 7. Zone Chanoe1-100 a request NRI, La Quinta Limited P\den to change Riverside County zoning signatior to Very Low Didential (RVL) and the General Plan gnation to Very Low Dsidential (VLRD) for approximately acres within the Snfluence of the City of La Quinta for sub quent annexation bhe north by Avenue 52, on the east by nroe Street, on tenue 53 and east of the existing City li ' s. 1man ins informed the Commission that the a icant had drawn th applications and no further action wa equired is time. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITT MATERIAL: None. INVill. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. Commissioner Tyler gave a report of th City Council meeting of May 15, 2001. G:\WPDOC S\PC 5-22-01 . wpd 15 025 U21O