The URL can be used to link to this page

2001 08 21 CCCity Council Agendas are available on the City's web page @www.la-quinta.org City Council Agenda CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-495 Calle Tampico - La Quinta, California 92253 Regular Meeting Tuesday, August 21, 2001 - 2:00 P.M. Beginning Res. No. 2001-102 Ord. No. 359 I. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Council Members: Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena II. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. III. CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS - SKI HARRISON AND TOM GENOVESE REGARDING NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE LA QUINTA MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6, MEET AND CONFER PROCESS. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS - SKI HARRISON AND TOM GENOVESE REGARDING NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6, MEET AND CONFER PROCESS. 3. EVALUATION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEE - CITY MANAGER - PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957. City Council Agenda Page 1 August 21, 2001 4. PENDING LITIGATION - GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a) - CITY OF ORANGE, ET. AL., V. SAN DIEGO COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION, VENTURA COUNTY CASE NO. SCO25999. NOTE: Time permitting, the City Council may conduct Closed Session discussions during the dinner recess. Additionally, if the City is considering acquisition of real property, persons identified as negotiating parties do not attend the closed session. RECONVENE AT 3:00 P.M. IV. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE V. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or matters that are not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. Please watch the timing device on the podium. For all Business Session matters or Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak to come forward at the appropriate time. VI. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA VII. PRESENTATIONS - None Vill. WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE IX. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - 1. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF AUGUST 7, 2001 X. CONSENT CALENDAR Note: Consent Calendar items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved by one motion unless requested for separate consideration by a member of the City Council or the public. 1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED AUGUST 21, 2001. 2. TRANSMITTAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT DATED JUNE 30, 2001. 3. TRANSMITTAL OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR JUNE 30, 2001. 4. ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH TRACT 27835, RANCHO LA QUINTA. City Council Agenda Page 2 002 August 21, 2001 5. ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH TRACT 27952, RANCHO LA QUINTA. 6. ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH TRACT 27952-1, RANCHO LA QUINTA. 7. ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH TRACT 28640, RANCHO LA QUINTA. 8. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 24197-3, MONTICELLO, CENTURY HOMES. 9. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS ASSISTANT ENGINEER I TO ATTEND THE FUNDAMENTALS OF INSPECTION PRACTICE SPONSORED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF BERKELEY IN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA ON OCTOBER 11, 2001. 10. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE COMMUNITY SAFETY MANAGER TO ATTEND A TRAINING CONFERENCE GIVEN BY THE CALIFORNIA EMERGENCY SERVICES ASSOCIATION, LOCATED IN KELSEYVILLE, CA.., SEPTEMBER 24 THROUGH 28, 2001. 1 1 . APPROVAL OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. STPLH-5433 (004) FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING ON AVENUE 52 FROM JEFFERSON STREET TO CENTRINO, PROJECT NO. 99-04. 12. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING SALARY RANGE ADJUSTMENTS FOR MANAGEMENT, CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AND CONFIDENTIAL CLASSIFICATIONS. 13. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION REGARDING SALARY RANGE ADJUSTMENTS. 14. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING VARIOUS ITEMS IN RELATION TO MARIACHI FESTIVAL 2001. 15. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL MAP 30168, KSL LAND CORPORATION. 16. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER TO ALLOW A TEMPORARY RECONFIGURATION OF IRRIGATION LINES TO ACCOMMODATE THE ULTIMATE WIDENING OF JEFFERSON STREET AT AVENUE 49, JEFFERSON STREET IMPROVEMENTS PHASE I - AVENUE 54 TO HIGHWAY 1 1 1, PROJECT 99-05. 17. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ROBERTI-Z'BERG-HARRIS URBAN SPACE AND RECREATION BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000. 18. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE PER CAPITA GRANT PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000. 003 City Council Agenda Page 3 August 21, 2001 19. APPROVAL OF USE OF THE LA QUINTA MUSEUM BY THE LA QUINTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOR A MEMBERSHIP RECEPTION. 20. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN A CONTRACT EXTENSION FOR A YEAR WITH HILTON FARNKOPF & HOBSON, LLC FOR AB 939 SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 /2002 XI. BUSINESS SESSION 1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 5.32 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE (MASSAGE BATHS AND SIMILAR BUSINESSES), AND ADOPTING THE COACHELLA VALLEY MODEL MASSAGE ORDINANCE FOR THE CONSISTENT REGULATION AND RECIPROCAL PERMITTING OF MASSAGE THERAPY BUSINESS ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE COACHELLA VALLEY AS CHAPTER 5.32 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE. A. MOTION TO TAKE UP ORDINANCE AND WAIVE FURTHER READING B. READ BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY AND INTRODUCE THE ORDINANCE 2. CONSIDERATION OF PARTICIPATION IN THE PROPOSED COACHELLA VALLEY ANIMAL CAMPUS. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 3. CONSIDERATION OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FOR PROVISION OF LIBRARY SERVICES. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 4. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND THE ASSUMPTION OF JURISDICTION BY THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913 - TRACT 24197. A. RESOLUTION ACTION 5. CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT TO RE -CONSTRUCT THE L-3 IRRIGATION PUMP STATION WITHIN THE LIMITS OF JEFFERSON STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE I - AVENUE 54 TO HIGHWAY 111, PROJECT 99-05. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 6. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF STANDARD DRAWINGS RELATED TO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA. A. RESOLUTION ACTION O O 4 City Council Agenda Page 4 August 21, 2001 7. CONSIDERATION OF OFFICIAL NAME FOR VILLAGE EVENTS A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 8. CONSIDERATION OF POINT HAPPY ART FEATURE A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 9. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11.44, SECTION 11.44.060 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE (PARKS AND RECREATION AREAS) RELATIVE TO THE USE OF BARBEQUES AT PUBLIC FACILITIES A. MOTION TO TAKE UP ORDINANCE AND WAIVE FURTHER READING B. READ BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY AND INTRODUCE THE ORDINANCE XII. STUDY SESSION - NONE XII1. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS 2. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WORKSHOP/INFORMATION EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (PERKINS) 3. C.V. MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (PERKINS) 4. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (SNIFF) 5. DESERT RESORTS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 6. DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AD HOC COMMITTEE (HENDERSON/ADOLPH) 7. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES COMMITTEE 8. MUSEUM EXPANSION COMMITTEE (ADOLPH/SNIFF) 9. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION & VISITORS AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 10. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS AIRLINE SERVICES COMMITTEE (HENDERSON) 11. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION 12. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FREE LIBRARY SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE 13. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DESERT LIBRARY ZONE ADVISORY BOARD (HENDERSON) 14. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (PENA) 15. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY/SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP (PENA) 16. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR JULY 10 AND JULY 24, 2001. 17. ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING COMMITTEE MINUTES FOR JULY 11, 2001. 18. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES FOR JUNE 21, 2001. XIV. DEPARTMENT REPORTS 1. CITY MANAGER A. RESPONSE(S) TO PUBLIC COMMENTS B. BI-MONTHLY CITY/CHAMBER MEETING OF AUGUST 10, 2001. 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK A. REPORT ON UPCOMING EVENTS. B. VACANCY ON ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE 4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIRECTOR 005 A. MONTHLY REPORT FOR JULY, 2001 City Council Agenda Page 5 August 21, 2001 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR A. MONTHLY REPORT FOR JULY, 2001 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR A. MONTHLY REPORT FOR JULY, 2001 B. 20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION COMMITTEE REPORT C. LETTER RECEIVED REQUESTING ACKNOWLEDGMENT FOR A CITIZEN OF LA QUINTA. 7. FINANCE DIRECTOR 8. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER A. MONTHLY REPORT FOR JULY, 2001 9. POLICE CHIEF A. MONTHLY REPORT FOR JULY, 2001 10. FIRE CHIEF A. QUARTERLY REPORT XV. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS 1. DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED ASSEMBLY DISTRICT REDISTRICTING PLAN - MAYOR PENA. RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. XVI. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak form and limit your comments to three (3) minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. XVII. PRESENTATIONS - NONE XVIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak, to come forward at the appropriate time. 1. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.04.130 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE, A) DETERMINATION OF THE SCOPE OF PARTICIPATION IN THE HEARING; B) PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPEALS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO ALLOW DEVIATION FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT APPROVED MASS GRADING PLAN FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF AVENUE 54, BETWEEN JEFFERSON STREET AND MADISON STREET AND DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 006 City Council Agenda Page 6 August 21, 2001 2. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO MISCELLANEOUS SECTIONS OF TITLE 9 (ZONING CODE) AND TITLE 13 (SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS) OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE. A. MOTION TO TAKE UP ORDINANCE AND WAIVE FURTHER READING B. READ BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY AND INTRODUCE THE ORDINANCE XIX. ADJOURNMENT - The next regular meeting of the City Council on September 18, 2001, in the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the City Council meeting of August 21, 2001, was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico and on the bulletin boards at the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce and at Stater Bros., 78-630 Highway 1 1 1, on Friday, August 17, 2001. DATED: August 17, 2001 J REEK, CMC City Clerk, City of La Quinta, California PUBLIC NOTICE The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at 777-7025, 24-hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. 007 City Council Agenda Page 7 August 21, 2001 City Council Agendas are available on the City's web page @www.la-quinta.org City Council ADDENDUM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-495 Calle Tampico - La Quinta, California 92253 Regular Meeting Tuesday, August 21. 2001 - 2:00 P.M. Beginning Res. No. 2001-102 Ord. No. 359 VIII. WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE 1. REQUEST FROM SUPERVISOR WILSON FOR LETTER FROM CITY TO LAFCO AGREEING TO POSTPONE FURTHER CITY -INITIATED ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS IN VISTA SANTA ROSA AREA IN EXCHANGE FOR WITHDRAWAL OF COMMUNITY OF INTEREST DESIGNATION APPLICATION SET FOR HEARING ON AUGUST 30, 2001. City Council Agenda Page 1 August 21, 2001 DECLARATION OF POSTING I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the City Council meeting of August 21, 2001, was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico and on the bulletin boards at the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce and at Stater Bros., 78-630 Highway 111, on Friday, August 17, 2001. DATED: August 17, 2001 JUNE S. REEK, CIVIC City Clerk, City of La Quinta, California PUBLIC NOTICE The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at 777-7025, 24-hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. City Council Agenda Page 2 August 21, 2001 08 161, 2 001 10: 00 ; 6I1: F :D 0gl1F SUPER-, ISCIR WILsnt,,lIS- PA GE 0 2 / 112' n i I-)A�� Llbz RI'VERSmF t7x-r-rcE: 4()g30 Lemop stre.et. 14tn Floor R1Wer,Fide, CA 92SD2.1647 ` - (909) 955-1.040 Fax (909) 955-219 3 ti UPERNJSOR Roy' WIELSO FOURTH DTSnUCT August 16, 2OO1 VIA FAX & U.S_ MAIL Mayor John Pena City of La quints 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Clear John; I)IS M)c- r OMCFJV(Al me Aw)mss: 46-200 Oasis Strut, Ste. 318 Indio, CA 9224.1-5933 {76(.►1 B�3-��271 Fax (760) 36_6.9905 Thank you for taking the time to meet with me yesterday regarding the Vista Santa Rosa area. As we discussed, I would like to formally request that the La Quinta City Council consider withholding any further annexation procedures in the Vista Santa Rosa area until June 30, 20O2, in exchange for a withdrawal of the Community of Interest designation application in front of LAFCQ. A decision in either direction on the COI matter would cause hard feelings on both sides of the issue_ As you know, Riverside County is working on an ambitious General Plan revamping (known as the Riverside County Integrated Plan), this is a particularly good time to bring together the various interests in the community, in conjunction with county planning staff, in an attempt to reach compromise land use goals which protect this unique community while allowing development that is in character with the region_ If the City Council concurs, John, I would request that you send a letter to LAFC0 in advance of the August 30 hearing on the COI informing them of your commitment. If you, council, or staff have further questions.. I will be happy to answer them. c: Mayor Pro Tam Stanley Sniff Councilmember Don Adolph Councilmember Ron Perkins Councilmember Terry Henderson City Manager Tom Genovese F-:tAezelllLettarslPeM ao8l601. doc Si e R0 Wil on F rth istrict Supervisor j`. ono INTERNE,T. district4,a ct).r verside.ca.us 08-16-01 08:57 RECEIVED FROM:7608638905 P.02 Cii!?i 'ayo, 4 44" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: AUGUST 21, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Demand Register Dated August 21, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: Approve Demand Register Dated August 21, 2001 BACKGROUND: Prepaid Warrants: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION CONSENT CALENDAR STUDY SESSION PUBLIC HEARING 46291 - 462941 145354.14 46295 - 463161 495486.52 46317 - 463181 303.00 46319 - 463221 3425162.17 Wire Transfers} 985993.22 P/R 7315 - 73821 925905.99 P/R Tax Transfers} 275647.55 CITY DEMANDS Payable Warrants: 46323 - 464471 9745361.99 RDA DEMANDS $15600,214.58 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Demand of Cash -City $1,176,008.33 Falconer, Finabce Director $151765008.33 4245206.25 $1005214.58 +. O11 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK TRANSACTIONS 8/01/01 - 8/14/01 8/01/01 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW 8/03/01 WIRE TRANSFER - DEFERRED COMP 8/03/01 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS 8/03/01 WIRE TRANSFER - CREDIT UNION 8/08/01 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW 8/10/01 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT $25,000.00 $5,596.87 $8,722.35 $5,297.00 $45,800.00 $8,577.00 $98,993.22 oil 002 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 2:22PM 08/14/01 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** PAYMENT AMOUNT 46323 08/14/01 &01012 LOST TRAILS LLC 195.00 46324 08/14/01 &01091 W BUFFIN/LA QUINTA PARTNR 99.26 46325 08/14/01 &01339 SUSAN MC DONALD 25.00 46326 08/14/01 &01515 ALL VALLEY DISTRIBUTING 15.00 46327 08/14/01 &01516 CENTURY AMERICAN DEV CORP 605.89 46328 08/14/01 &01517 CINDY HAMM 151.00 46329 08/14/01 &01518 JAN KIRKHAM 60.00 46330 08/14/01 &01519 FIRST SCHOOL OF DESERT 18.00 46331 08/14/01 &01520 MARIA GARCIA 300.00 46332 08/14/01 &01521 ROSALINDA RUIZ 300.00 46333 08/14/01 &01522 BILL MARLIN. 66.00 46334 08/14/01 &01523 DYSON & DYSON 61.80 46335 08/14/01 ABL001 ABLE RIBBON TECH 85.79 46336 08/14/01 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 89.41 46337 08/14/01 ALC050 BOB ALCALA 31.50 46338 08/14/01 AME153 AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS 150.00 46339 08/14/01 AME175 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES 249.00 46340 08/14/01 AME200 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS 58.27 46341 08/14/01 ARC100 ARCH 998.14 46342 08/14/01 ASCO01 A & S COFFEE SERVICE 30.00 46343 08/14/01 AUT030 AUTOMATED TELECOM 88.00 46344 08/14/01 BAN015 DAVE BANG ASSOCIATES INC 150.00 46345 08/14/01 BER125 BERG & ASSOCIATES INC 56576.86 46346 08/14/01 BER150 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC 19219.75 46347 08/14/01 BES150 BEST SIGNS INC 258.00 46348 08/14/01 CAD010 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 918.54 46349 08/14/01 CAL013 CAL ASSOC PARK & RECREATN 165.00 46350 08/14/01 CAR300 CARQUEST 37.39 46351 08/14/01 CDP050 CD PUBLICATIONS 339.00 46352 08/14/01 CDW050 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 301.71 46353 08/14/01 CLA050 CLASSIC AUTO TRANSPORT 150.00 46354 08/14/01 COA021 COACHELLA VALLEY ECONOMIC 5000.00 46355 08/14/01 COA071 COACHELLA VALLEY PRINTING 875.68 46356 08/14/01 COM015 COMPUTER U LEARNING CENTR 262.50 46357 08/14/01 CON015 CONRAD BUSINESS SVC INC 17000.00 46358 08/14/01 C00300 VALI COOPER & ASSOC INC 32483.01 46359 08/14/01 COR150 CORPORATE EXPRESS 415.84 46360 08/14/01 COS050 COSTCO BUSINESS DELIVERY 801.66 46361 08/14/01 CVI100 C V INDUSTRIAL & AG SUPP3 330.80 46362 08/14/01 DAN200 DANONE WATERS OF NORTH 500.45 46363 08/14/01 DEP150 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 140.00 46364 08/14/01 DES018 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2668.45 46365 08/14/01 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC 3413.76 46366 08/14/01 DES400 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 56.72 46367 08/14/01 DOU200 LES DOUGLAS 395.50 46368 08/14/01 DRE050 DREAM ENGINEERING INC 1232.00 46369 08/14/01 DRU100 DRUMMOND AMERICAN CORP 1613.61 013 0111 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 2:22PM 08/14/01 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 2 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME PAYMENT AMOUNT 46370 08/14/01 DYN100 DYNA MED 140.80 46371 08/14/01 ECO010 E C SEWER SVC INC 300.00 46372 08/14/01 EXP200 EXPRESS DETAIL 825.00 46373 08/14/01 FAB100 RENEE FABINI 36.65 46374 08/14/01 FIN050 F.I.N.D 60.00 46375 08/14/01 GAB050 GABRIEL'S WROUGHT IRON 2490.00 46376 08/14/01 GAR040 GARZA TURF & POWER EQUIP 743.04 46377 08/14/01 GAS010 GASCARD INC 230.34 46378 08/14/01 GE0010 GEORGE'S GOODYEAR 84.50 46379 08/14/01 GRA007 GRAINGER 243.51 46380 08/14/01 GRA010 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO 399217.60 46381 08/14/01 GUD100 GUDMANN/SLAUGHTER STUDIO 275.00 46382 08/14/01 HAR100 JOHN HARDCASTLE 62.00 46383 08/14/01 HEG050 JIM HEGGE 100.00 46384 08/14/01 HIG010 HIGH TECH IRRIGATION INC 365.09 46385 08/14/01 HOM030 HOME DEPOT 818.68 46386 08/14/01 H00050 FAYE HOOPER 100.00 46387 08/14/01 JUD010 JUDICIAL DATA SYSTEMS COR 142.20 46388 08/14/01 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 6000.00 46389 08/14/01 KRI100 BRUCE KRIBBS CONSTRUCTION 7150.00 46390 08/14/01 LAQ010 LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION 15000.00 46391 08/14/01 LAQ100 LA QUINTA VOLUNTEER FIRE 495.50 46392 08/14/01 LAQ400 LA QUINTA NURSERY 1500.00 46393 08/14/01 LEA020 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES 1078.00 46394 08/14/01 LES020 JANELLE LESLIE 42.00 46395 08/14/01 L00010 LOCK SHOP INC 637.88 46396 08/14/01 LOS050 LOS ANGELES TIMES 42.00 46397 08/14/01 LOW100 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC 42.81 46398 08/14/01 LUN050 LUNDEEN PACIFIC CORP 41326.94 46399 08/14/01 MEE100 WAYNE MEEDS 125.00 46400 08/14/01 MOM100 MOM'S GAS STATION 2875.02 46401 08/14/01 MUN010 MUNI FINANCIAL SERV INC 9182.97 46402 08/14/01 NAT031 NATIONAL RECREATION/PARK 375.00 46403 08/14/01 NAW010 RON NAWROCKI 2600.00 46404 08/14/01 NEX010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 2021.49 46405 08/14/01 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 11620.00 46406 08/14/01 OLI100 OLINN MESSAGE CENTER 101.84 46407 08/14/01 OUT100 OUTDOOR SERVICES INC 377.50 46408 08/14/01 OWE020 OWEN & BRADLEY 131.75 46409 08/14/01 PAL010 PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESRT 115125.00 46410 08/14/01 PEN010 JOHN PENA 105.84 46411 08/14/01 PIT100 NOEL PITTMAN 56.00 46412 08/14/01 POW020 DEBORAH POWELL 66.63 46413 08/14/01 PRI020 THE PRINTING PLACE 1202.93 46414 08/14/01 PR0005 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND 5863.75 46415 08/14/01 RAL050 RALPHS GROCERY CO 127.81 46416 08/14/01 RAN040 RANDAL'S PLUMBING 215.43 46417 08/14/01 RAS020 RASA - ERIC NELSON 5000.00 46418 08/14/01 RBF100 RBF CONSULTING 6921.03 014 OU4 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 2:22PM 08/14/01 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 3 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME PAYMENT AMOUNT 46419 08/14/01 RIE200 PAT RIENSCHE 67.20 46420 08/14/01 RIV020 RIV CNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLR 3933.20 46421 08/14/01 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS 4411.50 46422 08/14/01 RIV152 RIV COUNTY TRANSPORTATION 119900.00 46423 08/14/01 RIV325 RIVERSIDE RUBBER STAMP 116.54 46424 08/14/01 ROB200 SCOTT ROBERTSON 168.00 46425 08/14/01 SAX100 SAXON ENGINEERING SERVICE 1105.00 46426 08/14/01 SCA050 SCAN/NATOA 75.00 46427 08/14/01 SKY200 SKYTEL 16.63 46428 08/14/01 SMA010 SMART & FINAL 76.38 46429 08/14/01 SOU007 SOUTHWEST NETWORKS, INC 3162.50 46430 08/14/01 SOU010 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO 460.79 46431 08/14/01 SOU100 SOUTHLAND GEOTECHNICL INC 852.50 46432 08/14/01 SPRO10 SPRINT 771.67 46433 08/14/01 STA050 STAPLES 111.20 46434 08/14/01 STA150 STATER BROS 17.94 46435 08/14/01 SUN075 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY 357.00 46436 08/14/01 SUN080 SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP 2928.37 46437 08/14/01 TOS100 CORI TOSTE 330.00 46438 08/14/01 TRIO10 TRI LAKE CONSULTANTS INC 23789.50 46439 08/14/01 TRU010 TRULY NOLEN INC 75.00 46440 08/14/01 USB050 U.S.BANK TRUST NATL ASSOC 7232.50 46441 08/14/01 VAN075 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOC INC 1612.50 46442 08/14/01 VID050 VIDEO DEPOT 18.75 46443 08/14/01 VIV050 VIVA FOUNDATION 1500.00 46444 08/14/01 WES009 WEST COAST TRANSPORTATION 325.00 46445 08/14/01 W00100 DEBBIE WOODRUFF 329.00 46446 08/14/01 XER010 XEROX CORPORATION 185.50 46447 08/14/01 YOU100 YOUNG ENGINEERING SERVICE 7805.00 CHECK TOTAL 974,361.99 ols OU5 zz 11 N M rti N Cl) v Lf) l0 p Ln lD 1 r a o H z 0 c m i.i O 0 O r r r r r r O O O M o W H -4 .-+ , o 0 0 0 o O .-+ -4 C7 rt; m m m m m m m m m m m m m a s E-F E- H E+ H H E 4 H H H E 4 E- H lD (M O l0 O O a> O O O O O O O O --� H Z E• O N o O m O O O O O O O O W Z U') 0; Lr Lr r r r o m o o M 0) 01 N .--� ( � c �O �--� O o (1) N < O E M M a Q o �D o o rn o 0 0 0 0 o N O 0 m O O O o O w a. a; L� aL� a. r- o a ao 0 0 0 a m a m N a 1-4 a o >. >. >, Ln w ri o 0 H W W W W %D w W W -4 > M (Y) a 0 0 0 0 O czn U)V) 0 H H H w H W H p p U 1Ui Q w z H 1- 11 a o 0 0 co u w Q Cl) a E. a ° a s a Q M Cl) z H E+ U) H a H E-F a a a H U) H z H cn E--� u H o a 0 U O U) o o CD O o cn o H O o 0 O O D W H z H p H < H v) H p H U U U H < H co H a, H w H U U E-F w .a 4 .] X x x l7 z w w x "a' cL a m a U a m m m z w w w a U a cow O x p a W O H O O O O O O O O O O z U z z z z z z z Z Z z z z z z z z z Z z z z z z H U) O W O w p w z w O W O z O w O w O W O w z W z G] Cu > 44 > L-. > W > Lu > Lu Lt. Lu > c" > LL > Ls+ > W > LU C] w W W w W W W W W W W W W m w L" a a a a a a a a a a a a a ul rn H o a o, N > I > m r m 0 z z x a)M co 0) H p H .7 O r-i r1 r-i r1 M N Q z r1 r1 -� -, r H x 0 r-I -1 r-4 r-1 Q' r-1 K z a < m w m a I o O ll. H a o 0 0 qr o 0 0 0 c w o 0 0 0 0 Ln In U) 0. o 0 0 m E N N O O O O O O O c o z •-4 m m r rr rr r lD M M r O 0 M 17 M M (1) M H N N c c N c c c c c N N v z O O o O O O O O O o O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O 0 O O O O U O O o O O O O O O O O O o U Q O r1 .� .i rd r-4 r-1 O o O 0 O O O O O O O O r+ 1-4 r--1 -1 H r1 -4 r-1 r1 r1 .--1 -4 r-1 a a z a z z O H a w w D to M Q W O H H p 0 z U) U F1 p Ea+ < 44 O N < ra OI < z H 0 H H < a o >' z E O H a z H W a z Fat Q z U a x a a a IX) H co 0 H a a M z FC OI w H p 0 w H rS a H O m < < a Z 0 a w z a a a 3 < H F-1 H h w a H Cz, W U U U U z p 0 > N r1 am U) r r r m rn 0 N O >+ r-1 o m O M M 11 r 1 r 1 r i r i r-4 r 1 N N N U H r-d U) U) Lr) U) In In Ljr) U') U7 U " O r-1 O r-1 O ri O ,-1 o -1 O r1 O -4 O r-1 O r1 O r-1 O 1-1 O r1 O Q U w W W W 14 W W a %a La W id La z N M r OD r C' 01 o Lo co .-+ N lD M E- Z 1-4 a .--4 \ N x co O W U E- M r-i M -4 O � O -4 r O M . i O O H Iq ff) r-4 r O O O M O U a a Q N Ey OD E4 OD E4 N E• OD E-4 OD E4 M OD E• E4 OD E-4 OD E4 o E-+ OD E� W H OD E• M r' E-' o 0 O OD rn r , O u) o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 r OD lD o 0 z E- N N CD o 0 W xp z M M H lD co rn OD H M o Ln o N 1D O W aD M rn O o LO r H M OD a Q 0 o rn o 0 o r c o O m r LO O O CN .-i O 0 H lD a [cj lD Ln ap rn OD M o to rn v' m Lr) Oo Q� 0 M rS O N rn 0 !f H U) V) a zo cn cn w W a a n a w a Q a E + H a o< < < cn H a O � O 0 O O H .a 0 w H U O E• H cn O E-• O E� H a H 0 O O O U O 0 O 0 0 O ai O O a w a w0 a U) a U)a E- a s a °� co a s a >> a con a > > H a ❑ O ❑ ❑ O ❑ w H O ❑ w H O ❑ U 0 O ❑ co a O c7 c7 ❑ z z 4 o O ❑ O ❑ cn cn O ❑ O cn z H U to z O z w z D z W a LL z W 4 GL z w a E- z W w Da z V-I H W `.4 x U Z w z a a z Ulm w z a W c" > c= > a > > cn > > O 0 < > cn E- W > E4 0 W u W > L-4 LW W > w U Cl) a a Cl) vai wo ❑z a w a w w H ❑ a N rn N U') M M > 1 > co H OD lD N lD O N Z H ❑ H z H x =) z N M N OD a' �D l0 On OD N M H Q' M Ql (11 O N N Ol M C1 �D ❑ H x H H H lD M r M a% M M lD (n M lD r M < z a < w w w a 1 0 0 w E- a cr o 0 0 0 0 o o �D \D CC) m D m CYr M 0 \D 0 \D 0 0 ao c o 0 0 ur o Ln u-) Ln m OD �D kD �J z r ry) lD H rl O M O Ol O M O O o O U-) M L) MMH17 M Ln C' r r lD lD lD lD lD w �D lD r �D z O O O O O '-1 LO r Lr) N O -1 u') O O ,--i O N o M u) Cl) u) M M UO CDc M N N u-1 LO U r1 r 1 r I r 1 1 1 < o o O O r O r O H 1 O o -4 ri H O '-i H O O r o r-1 O ,--4 O U) co cn W W W U) cn cn cn U) U W. M Ix Q Z) z z Z) z co w U Op Wu U U a > i LOx p, U E� H H U)cn H co O c4 a w 0 U < z E-4z z w w z w H z � W a ' z z a O lu a a 0 0 a 0 w w W H ,a ❑ � a EW w E• m H a `� 00 o z z z z w ❑ a o �• a a a Q a U H a Q o a z a x w Q m H w H H w w H w H (n CO W no N N M N H O O H O M Lr) LO Ln 0 0 0 -4 O r r r O o o O M <U E� L �-+ m a W w w W w u u u Eo. 017 < adder Q a 001 z < O Ql r W O -4 Ln .--q lD r1 r r1 O rti m r1 N M M M m O ri r1 .--i N r1 M 1 r �--� .--� r♦ r~ r~ N r-� O N N E-F Z r1 O .-1 � M � CD O a W U' s U H Q m r O m H M .-+ m H M .--I m HE- r O N O oo E-� O m H O CD HE- O N O CO H O m H O ao H M m E-� M ao H M CO H M ao H M 0o E- M ao H M m H M m H M w H r O CO H r O CD H O CX) H O m F M •-+ H z H O O N r1 c r O O O O O O O O u) N s N O O O U') O u) Ln N O O O U') Ln r O O O O O u7 L N O 0 O Lr) co O co 0 W >+ a+ z O 00 FL 0 Ul) r+ l0 c m M O M lD O c r O u) r N c M C' Ln OD C7 c M O N O -4 r1 m V M Lf) L -4 C` z lD 01 Llr) .-� pp OO cT 1p lD r .-1 pp N O '-1 c r r1 1-4 O .-1 O r-q r r lD u1 .-r 0) r-q x u) (y C� OJ r O O O O lD N Lr) r 0 0 m CO O U O Ln .+ H z H z lD r Lf) Ql -4 N O> co ,n N (x U U X W w w w U �-, O > H H H a H a ao W 0 rC H a 0 o W > co o~ a w x w 0 Q> cn a rC H rx O o W <a H H U x cn z 00 U H F U a cr.0 cn z U a rs H a 0 W > U > x U w x U z a a, U > x U w x U z a a• U > x U w x U z a n, U > x U w x U z a a U > x U w x U z a a, U > x U w x U z a w U > x U w x U z a a, U > x U w x U z a 04 U > x U w x U z a a, U > x U w x U z a a4 U > x U w x U z a a, U > x U w x U z a a, U > x U w x U z < a a, U > x U w ,x U z < a a, U > x U w x U z < a a, U > x U w x U z rS a a, U > x U w x U z a> a a, ,-a < o x 0 o W a o U F 0: o a, cr Z u> 1 cn a rS o a 0 o W V) 2: cr O O H" z a CO z2: cz 0 z 0 cn a 0 F1 z 0 U W H 0 a O > z H r1 I O H x > z H w m x =) z rn N r N r1 o r4 I O O m o r♦ I O O 0) r N 0) r-a N r1 O 01 r-) N N O m .-i N r O 0) r1 N r1 r1 m r1 N cN ri O> r1 N M m 00 r-+ N o O O) r1 N M O 0) r j N T O m r1 N u) O 0) r-) N O m r1 N O 0) r1 N O m ri N M r-+ 0) r1 N v r 1 m ri N o r1 Ol r1 N 0 k.0 0 r O o r Lr) M r rn t0 ul M v 110 v u7 Ln r < z a � m w m a I 0 O w E-F z W m O O Cl p O O O O p M N L7 r u) Ln r Lr) Ln r u) u) r (n Ln r Ln Lr) r (n a) r Ln al r Lr) u1 r u7 Ln r Lr) Ln r u7 u) r a) (n r U') u') r u) Ln r u) Ln r u-) L O O O O Cl O 0 O O O O O 0 z H r1 N l0 rn O tD m O lD ri O l0 m O lD m O w 0) O 110 a) O l0 rn O �D a) O lD m O lD 0) O lD 0) O lD m O l0 0) 0 klo a) 0 �.0 m 0 l0 0) O l0 0) O l0 rn O l0 r1 \0 r l0 r -4 lD r r-4 lD z m O U r1 U-) N M r l0 L() r lD r1 0 r-I N Ln C' N u7 V' N Ln C' N u) V' N u) Q' N u) Q' N u) C` N Lr) C' N Ln Q' N u) V` N Lr) R' N u) V' N u) C' N Ln VT N u7 c' (N u) V' r i u1 N M Ln V` r u7 M r Lr) M U Q ri o ri .-� 0 C ri 0 C ri 0 r1 .-� 0 r1 ri 0 r1 r-i o .-f r-I O r1 ri o r1 .--1 0 r1 r1 0 r-i r1 0 ri ri 0 ri ri 0 r1 ri 0 r1 r-i 0 r 1 ri 0 ri .--1 0 r1 r1 0 r i r-i 0 ri H 0 ri r1 0 ri ri 0 r1 ri 0 r1 U z M o a FC ' W a m < < a cn H E-4 z oa r� w a o z w F-4 U) W H H U o (n u z< < m w > Q 0 U z H cn W H a 11 0 vwi w (Do a w m U z H cn W H H 0 Cf) m w s w m U z H x C7 H z W a z Q x >+ rx x w m U z H a C7 H z W �a z Q E >+ a x w m U z H a 0 H z w w z rZ E >i a a w m U z H a rC u H z W a z Q E >1 x x w m U z H a u I-1 z W w z Q >+ x a w m U z H a 0 H z W a z Q >+ x a w m U z H a a 0 H z w w z Q x >4 a x w m U z F-4 a u H z W w z Q E x a w m U z H a u H z w w� z Q x >. a x w m U z H a u H z W z rl E a a w m U z H a a 0 F1 z w w z << x >.i a rz w m U z H a 0 h1 z W w z x a rx w m U z H a H z W w z Q >4 a a w m U z H x H z W La z a!: a a w m U z H a Q H z W a z Q< x x a w m U z 1.1 x Ft H z W a z E a a w m U z H a H z W a z Q x a w m U z H cn F cn w m 1+ w a, z (n 0 w z 0 H w 0 4 a m (n 0 w z 0 F w 0 + H F{ U > o z < m Lr) N r1 as W m u) N .-i W m 0 u7 r1 a W m 0 Ln r1 a W m 0 u7 r1 a W m 0 u7 r1 a W m 0 u) r1 a G] m 0 ul r1 a W m 0 Ln r1 a W m 0 Lr) r1 a (4 m 0 u) r1 x W m 0 t() r1 a 14 m 0 U-) .q x W m 0 u7 r1 a W m 0 al r1 a W m 0 Ln r1 x C4 m 0 u7 r1 a W m 0 J) r1 a W m Co al r1 a W m 0 Ln r1 (n W m 0 r1 O COO < U 0 1-4 O < U 0 r1 O < U z N M N M o .-i N m M cr v Lr) Q Ln 1�0 r m N N ri -4 N" N N CV 14 N N r-1 N 1-1 a O H z r1 Cl 11 a r, � � x OD U O O M M M M M r (r) O r O M r O r r r th O W H r♦ -1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r•1 ri O 1-4 r-1 O -4 .-+ 0 1.4 O O O O C� < m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a w ca H H H H H H H H H H H HE- H H H E-F H H M Ln to O M O 01% Lr) O O1 O Ln c N O O N Ln r-i O .-+ H /M r U) O O m cM O M 0 m r -4 O O Cl l0 O Ln z H W z r r N r O (1 r If) r 01 r1 M l0 O O M v m N O 0) 0) m O N � 0) t0 M Ln m� U') O 1D r M lD O ri Ln .--1 N a a) o rn 0 r, o o m Ln o M o r 0 0 1.0 m o o z Ln ri M M O Ln O H r 01 r M M 1 O Z' m Ln a a a 0 a U En U) U) a s a z a H< Q < z< < w m O Q z H ❑ H z H z H fZ w H H H H ❑ x .] H v 0 0 0 � O O O O W O 3 0 O 01 O W O w H a H a H H E> O H w O> c� z H a cn cn cn cn cn cn a x a a w IX cn x w a H a z cr.w w a o ff E E o W o W o "0 w cn o w o U)O z E• o U > x a cz a a a x a❑ a❑ a❑ x❑ H< ❑ a❑ O: ❑ W a z❑ 0 z U o 0 0 0 0 0 o z w z U z U z a a H z U z w z N H a z x H to Lti LL. Lu Lcu LL Lu Lu W m W H w cn w a w z w H W m w H W ❑ W F, w H H H H H 1--1 F- > m > Z > > a x 1--1 > x > E > H U H > (n ❑ z z z z z z z w w o o< a W w H W w z cn z z z z O z z > cn U) U a > U x x H w Lu U W r1 0 0 H ❑ LL' r-1 r-1 v' LO lD p 0 w H a> C 0) N 0) N > I > CO r 'IT m N Ln N N -4 r-1 Ln 0) a) m I r N w z z 2 c r O c � c m I M M O ri m 14 r m r4 H❑ H p Ln Ln �.c Ln rn��,O 0 r O N m c o r-1 uJ %.0 H z t!') 1-4 m r M (M r r-1 r-1 ❑ m w m O N N N ❑ r r l0 r Un lD l0 r O W W w r 1 N N N N H x Q z a r.� W w ao a 1 0 O Lu H 0L O O O O O O O O a> O ri N O M O O O O N w O O O O O O O O c O r-1 r-1 O c O O O O 01 fY] O O 0 o O O O 0 lD O m m O �10 O O O O Ln r r r r r r r 0) d> r1 M M m m 01 r r r 01 z -4 1-4 r-1 1-4 ri 1-4 1-4 Q' r-i Ln 0 O 0) .-4 C7' Q' Q' cT O t.0 w t10 uJ r r Ln �-o k.0 1.0 uD H z M M M M M M M 1-1 ri N N N "T N .-4 M N .--4 r-1 M Lo Ln Ln LC) Ln Ln Lr) Lr) O O O U') O O O Ln Lo Ln O O c IT 'T cr v c 17 N Ln ra Lo cr Ln N c 1-4 r-1 N U U 1-1 1-4 H 1-1 .-4 -4 . 1 H r 1 H N r N 1-1 r 1 1-4 -A 11 r 1 < O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O O r-1 r-4 1-4 r1 ri r-1 r-i e--i Ln ri T) ri Ln In ri 1-4 ri -4 ri z U CD 0 0 z E" z z z H z w H O H H H W a z z z z U. >4 > >4 '>4 >4 >4 U O O H H H U a M a cu oa4 w a a a a a a a U U U (n w a a a z o a a a a a a a 0 m D m a n .7. n w H 1�H Q -1 >+ >+ >+ >+ z Ln m m m m m m m cn cY °i x z H H H H a a .Wa .w7 Q Q E E E a o z z z a a a a w a a a rx a a a Q H w w w 0 < rs at rs a 1 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a H x z E. > > > > z z z a ❑ W H Fi H 1-1 H H H H a z z z z z z z z o H w w w <.�� a a a x CQ H z z z a cn cn a > > > U a a a a w U) w Cp O O O H W W W W E, >+ a H H H H H H H < ❑ p u U (D U) x S T x ❑ a a w w w w w w w o1 a u) U U U U a a < 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a rz a ❑ <<<<< a< < a ❑ o 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 cn z U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U H 44 w z 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 1 ,-, .-� LO D 0 0 CD C) C) rD C) CD o Ln Ln C) Ln Lr)C) N r r r r1 019 O Y4 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U H ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ a z a 3 3 3 Q Q Q< Q U" < Q< Q Q Q< Q Q ❑ ❑❑❑ a O O O O O Q U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 009 z Ln m (n r m M O —1 O —4 N cr Lr) M -,r Ln kD Q lD r O < N N N N N N M M M M M r'1 M M m M M r M M c• O F Z r-1 O V' r-1 \ Ln x m O W U E-- M M M O r-I O r-t O r-1 O .1 O e-i M •-+ M .1 M rti O 1-4 O r1 M ri M r-4 M 1-4 M O O M - O C7 < m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m •-4 m •--4 m r� m m r-4 m a s m F F F E-� E+ E-H F F F F F F E-F F F F F F F E- F M O \D Ln M Ln M N o lD c• -4 O N N c r O O Ln O • F Z F O (n O m c M m N M r r1 O v M m r-i M m U') m O W z O M C 1 C 1 N m IT ri m M N Ln C� 01 r I ri c O r N O O O r-a lD r-I v c r N —4 m lD Ln Ln k.0 U) M N r v >+ O O —1 M r1 M r i —4 a Fl .-4 N -4 O O c tD O Ln Ln O 0 m m c• N z O > > M Ln r-L O O w �D 0 0 U) U) m r-I O M O >1 N I1 O lqr %T m M Ln a z rI M Z O a w F W F > a a a o � � a w a H H a a a a a s o 0 o H O FO Fp 0 0 H 0 .va cn UFi 0 ut: W H F O F E F E- FO EO- 3 a z IU1 D: a 0 0 u: Cl) co U) Cl) U) V) co U) Q: co C/) U) cn U) Cf) a to a U) (D a O O H O F O U) U) O W W W W W W W W O W W W W W W O W O W z O O > (Y. 0 Cl) p z z p H H H H H H H H a H H H H H H 0 H 0 H H p 4 z U z a z w W z a a a a a a a a z a a a a a a z Ia z -a x z m H cn w m W 44 44 W a a a a a (L a, a W a. Q. a n4 a a• W a w Qa Z W W > 54 > E-4 [r, > a a a a a a a a> a a a a a a> a> Cl, H> a p z w w U m=) =) U 0=) =) 0 0=) M o D D a U) w fs+ H h h U) U) U) U) (n U) co co U) Cl) U) U) U) U) U) U) 0 U U W m r rn O c �D kD m I I I --I p cz r1 �D M m N r r o m m�.o �D �o O W r-I M M m r O 0 N r I I r-I r-1 r i CT M O > I > m lD c• I'D m m tD t.0 lD \D lD lD r M Lf) I z C) 3 x 3 3 3 x x x v c• m m r rn rz-I ❑ U U U U U U U U lD m m m m r r M �o H Z Liz r r r-4 r-I r-i r-I -4 r i r-I H Q' a' -7 T C' C' Ln QT Ln U') p H x Ln r-I r-I O O O O O O O 0 r1 r 1 r-4 r l r-1 M m m M a> z a � m w m a I O 0 w E-+ CY. O O O O O O O O O N O N v O N Co r 1 r r r lD W O O O O O O O O O O O O CO O O O —1 v c IT m m O O U') O O O O O O m O m m O m O m m m m Ln .7 (`') Ql Al r I r I r1 r-A r-4 H M r1 ('M M r-I M M M M M M (71 z O O O CD O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CDO F lD z r-1 m m r-1 r-t r-i 1 r-I r-t M r-I M M r-I M r N c c c r I O Ln m m Ln Ln O Ln O O Ur) O Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O Ln Ln U- O O U r I lD lD M M c c N N H N r i I r1 ri M Ln c v c M U Q r 1 0 r1 O H O r I O r-I O r-I O r-I O r-I O r-i O -4 O -4 O I O r i O -4 O r-I O r-I O N O r-4 O ri r-4 11 r-I CI' Q' H r-4 -4 1-4 r-I r-1 r1 11 ri r-1 .1 -1 r-1 Ln r-i O r1 O ri O H M U U U z z z z z z w z z z w w w w w w M x x H H H > > > > > > U) E+ F W H H H H H H M U U U a a a a a a U 0 0 0 O O Q o 0 o p Q Z Z co m m m m m m m U) pW 0 cn v) m m m cn m w m m Lb Cu [sa p Ln a Q Q W W W W W W W W M M M M U) M 00 h Cl) a s rz rx rx x a a M M M M M (n a (4 La La a a a a (L a a a w w w w w w < U) U) 44 I Z x x x x x x x x z z z z z z H w C; 0 H Q. a' W W W W (sj [cj [ij (,j H H H H H H (x W EQ w F M a w �� < a z a z m O O w F w F w F w F w F w F w F w F m ,")� m m m m m U) O 3 3 W I I 00 FC Q FC rt p a >4 a p U U a x a rx x oc a rz O o 0 0 0 o z w w H < a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U H z za a Ft fZ O fZ 11 F-I a a a a a a a a F F E. F F F o 0 a m z a s x z cz Ix m a m a v) w m m m m > z z a U) z 0 < a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q Q w F w w U >> U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0 p p z 0 > Ln 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M r-- 0 o Ln Ln Ln Ln o Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln o 0 o Ln O U F O M m r-I r-I 1 I r 4 r-I r-I O O O O O O I N N 14 U I I z O 0 rx a rz a a z a a cn cn cn cn cn cn H Z Z a U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O > Q a W U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U p 0 p 020 010 Z o r r-4 N M kD c r Lf) �D r m cc m rn a O N MN N N N N N N N N M M M M F Z ri O 1*1 Q' H \ tD T m U r- O r r r M r M r r r M O O M O w E- O r-1 0 0 0 '-+ O H O O O r-1 r-1 •--1 1-4 U < OD 00 m m m 00 m m ao m 1b m 00 m m a s m F F F F F E-F F F F F F F F F F M • O In lD O O N O O r-1 O O O O O Ln .--1 F u) m r O O r O N m O O O 1�0 z F w Z N O) N N O M O O al O t0 x D r IT Q' M M to C11 M r Q' a' O .-4 '-1 M >4 E N -4 7 M N N O a Q o Lr) N O O -4 O O O 0 r rr u) o 00 0 0 o m M O n N M o o �n •-1 Q M (N lD r 1 M aD Q N M Z 1 r1 \ O Z W W E- U H U F U v) a• Q a n 0 F r1 rZ Q cn rs FL cn rZ Q rs 2 F F Q E Z F F U U U F Z F F U F F C7 F FF Z Z F O O O > > > O O O O > O O z 0 U O H H p W H F F m cn F U F a F rn F E-+ H F H E-H Q F � U-1 a CG c!) U)z F F F CZ O O -F ZZ Em U) CY " cr a Cr� a O OH O W W O U U U O F O U O U O W W O < O W O WWO H > a O H H O < < < n O O O < O H H O cZ O c.) O a a n to z U z a a z z a z z w z cc z z z a a z E+ Z z U U z cc H rn w a s W F F F W O W E-F w F W a s CQ w a w H H W O w > a a> Z Z Z> H> rn > Z> a n. > Z> Z> T T> U n 0 0 coo 0 z O z 0 a 0 w w x U) cn cn U U U U H U rn rn U a >> w w w u nw x C)� a rn o w M m 0 o rn > i > m M OD m m rn r1 o a N r 0 m r Z z E OD r O O O O m Ln M 1-4 r C>1 a H O H O r-1 1-1 r r r 00 0) fM 1n O 00 ul H z Ol N N N o .--1 N -1 1n M M OD m In M M H � Q z a r.0 w m m x 1 O o w F a r o o N N c 0 r M m o W v, O M M M O a) M M M o v" c c. o fQ m O to In al O Ln m N O 00 tD lD O E O M M 1.f) U-) to M a) Ln M M M M m 0) M z o o O o O O 0 O o 0 O o r1 I" O r r 1n un Lr) r �D �.o r r r r �D r F z c' r c 1-4 r1 M N m M M N M .-1 r-1 f" ) O L 1n Ln 1n o In O o In 1n O In O O Ln O v' M M c N C N r C cr N C In 1n N U -4 -4 r-1 O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O ri ri ri r-1 H .--I r-1 C' r-1 H ri .-i U) In ri z a s o a s a s EH-• z 0 0 U H U U M O O O o v) a) rx C� Z Z U O a H H Ln zzz H H U) t 1 Quu Q Z z z H F-1 H a s F F rn U) U v ul w w > Q Q H U U a a a cn z rn F F z Q W W z x x n Q H Q Q w W H a z w w F H h a u zCO n n n w n n Q O H F F F F Z O W z Z w 3 U) rn Ga >4 a a s a a a cD o O O E W cn v) a Q O vwi co u)i cn c~n cn w z U CW w Z U) a z 0 0 41 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 o w w w z F Ga w z 0 > 00 m u) Lr) ur) o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M H r- 1.0 �c k 0 0 1n o 0 0 .-1 0 0 0 O H O O O O O U) N O H ,i z 021 U F cn cn cn cn cn cn O w O � Z O a nN. � U H w w w w w w O x z a �• U x x Q FL U an Ono O O O no O W W W ca. Oil z m rti m N M c 1n %.0 r -4 N O -4 M N M M Q' a O E� z O c � r x 0o U r o r Coco 0 o M M r r M o w E 4 o r+ o H .-4 r-4 -4 1-4 .-4 r-4 -1 0 o H 0 r.> m m ao m m m m m m m m m m m a a co E� E-+ E� Er E• E• H E-F E- E+ E• E• E• E- M 0 0 rn Ln o o O H o 0 0 o c �-+ E-+ z E- O o o m T o o Ln LO 0 0 w z O O M N M N N c M .-1 l0 u� N O O� 0)r Ni 00 m a m M r �0 0 N O H N r� Q x 0 N H m a M �D LnO CDc c O H N CDCDO lD O O O M Ln O �O O O M O c M r N M tD W 01 c (`') m C' -1 r (N N N U) N x H N rn W Z m W O M N z H a E4 cz W z O O H cn !z E- a a E--4 a a cn m m m a a a 3 3 a a u a na. Q Q cn < < w w w w Q Q < Z E� z E• I El E-H v) U) E, E- E-Z Z E-U E-0 F z O O 0 0 CQ O O < Q< Q O O O O O O x 0 W O G1 1" 1 E• H E-1 o E• EF x x x x El E• E• H H E. U EF E• a w m `n a a a a " a cz x cn cz x z U) m U U rz o a E cx U O H O 0 O fs O W O o 0 0 0 0 O w 0 0 0 0 z 0 W O H > rz H 0 G. 0 H 0 LL c1. f1. ow 0 0 H 0 cl' z 0 H O 0 0: w a w a w z U) z a z E• H z Qa z m z F H Ul W H a a a a w W w GL U3 co U) w LL W E w U w 0 > z> W> a> w w w w> rz > w> z z> H> H> W Un o x 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 z w a w w U U) U) 44 [4 Cu 44 U) U U U) a W (n c r m 0 0 H 0 a' Lr) N Lo m O I I 0 t 1 1 1 1 r r m z z E r 0 c 0 v, qm r H IH H 0 H 0 LO Ln O O 0 0 1n I Lrn 1rn u) 1 1 z 0) O O O O O O \0 m MT M u") N Lr) N M pp N 01 m m m M O\ �y N 01 Q z a Q m w a4 a 1 O O EW E• cz O o r 110 I'0 �0 �0 0) r M M t 1 0 w LQ o o q7 c c v-7 q Ln U-) m o O O m m Ln u') N Ln O 0 1n f`1 M aN Ol 01 01 01 M 0) 0) Ln Ln z lD In O -1 1-4 1-1 -4 H O O O 1.n Ln .� N Hm \O r lD lD 1.0 t.0 l0 r �D l0 N l0 l0 z 0 N r c r 1 -1 r-1 ri v 1n M O c r O 0 N Lr) cM 1n o 0 0 0 0 Ir r o o Ln U v LO Ln Lo u") Ln v t0 lD 0 r-1 M U r 1 o r i H -4 '-+ r-1 r-1 4 1-4 1-4 H -4 H r 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 ,-1 u') Ln Ln u) c r r1 r a O O O z o, o a w z z H M ~' O O U) O W H H O 3 134 a o a a .Wa 1 O Q Ga U U U U z z Q < W E,z U) z z O O a U a z _ !] 0 H H H H U U VI (a] 00 H 0 a E" 0 0 0 0 a W \ a z H a x z a w C� W HE� W Z z N u u u u x W x �C aw x H a a z z x z a 00 m Q a Q m Q m m m 0 LOx £ Q' C7 C� Q Q Q w Q: R: o O H E-� 124 w C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C� C� C7 C� h • h z 0 M > o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O O O o o 022 OU tf) Ln Q' -1 H -1 '-4 1.1 O -1 r-1 O O LO H 0 0 C) 0 CD O 0 O O O O H r-1 O O z Q 0 tY C9 Q U Gu CQ7 U) CQ7 Cal C<7 C7 x x (07 012 z < m O cr Ln -10 r m m N m (n M O a') O al - ill N a-)LO M c f" ) ,--q � ri O H O Z � OD o m w C7 x U H Q O . + m M 4 m M 4 m M �q m M '-, m M r, m M �q m M '-+ m r o m O rr m r O m O ,--4 m M m m ,--I m M •--4 m M r-4 m r 0 m O r4 m w w m H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H M E-F Z H N m v a) M T (n O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W Z u I 1-1 Ql Kr r O 10 N O r m �o c' M r O O N O O O O r r O l0 O c O r �+ O `N 'T O M O M m i m ul N \D CD O M a Q r+ Lr) o O m O m l0 0 O 0 CV 0 O o O 0 O 0 O Lr) M m r+ m O O r-I o N N c o O O 3 o x Q U1 Cn a 0 L rt >+ H a o O 0 a C h Z W U) H Cr. z Q H 0 r Q z W Lrl r+ U) O o� o H G] w O U) a C4 C w a a > Z O a < O a H O Q H a H E- Q < H N C a C Q H S a. t a o W a E• a< LO FF E- W H E"' E O H fz o H H H O H 0' Q D 0 H w Cz w a E-F w w 0 a� C CI- O H 0" > w z a o 0 Cl) w H cn w H cz o C m w H m w H m w H m w H m w H m w H cz o C 0 U U a o C U (DO a a w [U ] E- a o �4 a � a a (D z a o z a o a z z + U CO zr w a a s a4 Z w a a a a� a a. a a. a a a a Z w Cz H z w Z F-I a4 C Z w Z H Q Z H Q C z W 3 w Q g w a Q E~ H H z C z w C z z C z w (n W cn w C > a� O cn a O cn > w C cn a C cn a O cn a C cn a C cn a. O cn > M z H > a Q a > E-+ W cz &. W G>~ > C cn C cn (j) H c a > cL a > cz [+. w w H O C Lz E4 Ol tr) N (`') O M N N O N O M M 00 O > Z I > Z m x M M N O N O O '�T M - r O M N -T N m M m Lr) m O N H C C H H C z M O Ll M O lr) ri M C' O O M O M ul � N O N O rl M al M M M l0 -4 ul .-i r -A U �+ < H Q d4 z Ln N ri rl �--� ri m m m a a Q m w m I a o o H w cz W m r m r m r Q m r a m rr Q m r Q' m r Q' m r Q m N m ul 0 O 0 N N m N N m 0 O O 0 O O 0 O O o 0 O r r-4 M O m N z M O r M O r M O r M O r M O r M O r M 0 r M o r Ol O Ql O -10 Lr) O T) O Ol O Ql O M O M 0 M v Ol 0 H Z C ill Lr) Lr) v' Lr) cr Lr) c N -.7 itl C' Ul) N O 1-4 Lr) �0 M O �0 M O 1 I c Q O ko l0 LOO U U vLr) v c c O Cl) Q O O O O O O O O O O rl O O O -4 O rl (D r1 O rl O e-i O rr U z" U z O U z U) z U) O 1-1 O H O F-1 O H O H W z H 00 H Z Cn w H H 0 H H w H U a H U a H U a E-H U a F Q z H Cu M 0 o H Q H Q C C m m m m O Qz W ul a' '-' '�' Q Q O O O O W Z Q 1 a a cr. s r~ a w s w U m U m U m U m U) H z o a p W a Q E-H z I -I" x x H H a E- a H a H a H W a C C O C O m [O m m m m m m Q Q > Q U HH U aaa 00000 CW 0 O ° a Q H O � omH I- a4 x a4 S4 z z<m Q a Q a tz o o x U x 0 W W W E W E W E W E W �• H C a w z a w z w U z w U w w U m w U z D a HJ a U)Z H 44 W H x H x O x O x O x O x O x O x Q 1-4 O h H x H x a m s m 0G m a m a a 023 Z C O U O >4 H > CD -1 O 0 1-4 O CD CD M CD x CD M x O M O X: O M O x O M O x (D M O x O U1 O O C) -1 O O CD O O CD O H o O O CD HU CD O H O a O O a F-4 x H x x x x x x x x 44 aQ ,a 0 3 z < v7 � N U-)m U-) lD M M Ln Ln u� Im � Lr) � r M kD r m m O � CC) 0 \ F O z Ln Ln Ln Ln M \ am OD x U M o r r o M o o r M M M M Cl W U a, w tD Q m F 1-1 m F o m E-F o m m E- r~ m E- r1 m F r♦ m F o OD F .-+ m F r~ m F r, m E- r4 m E- M r. m E- r p m F M F C Ln C p 0 o o o m co o o ao rn o o %D m u rr o o r z G] F z M m r- O m r- N r Q' Q' N CV r (V m m r � en O ul) Ln c a O CO M a, r-1 r`) c a) N V' N N r O Ln O O O O O O co m O O m Cr) O p N p �n Ol Q O O Ln W M W m r C)lD N v� r M 17 N M N r 1 r m x tx U > U) > Un z F a FC F F z W a rS F O E-a W z < F .; < F a 2 E+ z a < F a < E" z H a a cn a a a a a F E W o H a O 0 E-W E O F Un o E- a O E. o E-H 0 0 E. 0 ElE-F E O Z O F x O W a W a W a W F 0 >+ " O > a H a a M Un z O n < rn Q a O n O O cl� Ix O n � U n rx O in c� O n w H a a U) O w n c� 0 n a < s O E- U a O a o Q; w a w s w tx [.w Ix 0 U z W z H U cn W z w o z w Un Un z w z F z W Un x z W U M H z w w z w U m n n z w n a F n z w aL a a U H a U r-, a U H a U H n z n O+ o a> w> 3 <> U z H > o> a m >> z> a Un ~ > w � x > x > x > x> > a wn w t� cn o Un m H n 0 Q: W O O u-) m CD m r \ > I H n > W : N a m 00 (N N ri m C) m C)r1 m I r o rn n H H x z f D lD W m ul N O � l0 \ r- N vr MQ1 v " N C) N �T C) N r N N < z w < W W m a 1 O o w F rL W fT] O m Ln Ln i lD O O O N U) O O O O O O O O O O O O CT U) c yr c k.D m v kD m yr �D p O O z O O c O u) v O a) O O F lD %D lD lD m kD r �D lD lD �D lD lD �D N z O I'D Ln (n N Ln M O O N Ln M O N N v Ln N O O Cl .--4 O r-I O .-4 O p O U Q O O O O O O O c O N O Ln O Ln O Ln r-4 O Ln r 4 O Ln .-4 O O p r-+ w a w `n W U z M p rx W W F }' z F H U W z H �, O U z O z O z O z O z O H z W vl Ln a Q z a W � a H u H W H U H H F H F H� F F F a Q a z u� H a £ Q 0 to cn Un H Un p cn U z W H H z H z p W O W u O a z w m 0 m u m 0 m u m C7 Q H >4 Ol w a m z a z au m a w x z Q co w w o z cn cn cn cn cn w H n F Cu W Q z h U a U) a a z a < g O E O E O O O g z O >+ > Op -4 p0 c O O N O O O O p O O O Ln C) C)O C)O O ClO O O O O C)O r♦ 024 O F U H < U a < a a Q a a W a U)U W a O a U)3 O a O a z a w W x O E x O x O x O E 1-4 x O E p 014 z M O r 4 N M -.7 Ln lD r w M O .-+ N 1-4 N M O sT to l0 r w 01 O . 4 < O M Cr V' c C c V c c c R Ln Ln u) l0 t0 l0 l0 \O lD lC �D �D \D r r F z 1-4 O IT -� O OD U r r r r r r r r r r r r r r M M M o M M M M M M M M O W F O O O O O O O O O O O O O O • r~ rr 1-4 1- ,4 — r. C7 OD co co co CD m m co co m CO co m Ib CO O W Ib m 07 CD a7 OD m co m a s E-+ E-4 E-4E-4F H F F F F F F F E-4 E-4F F E-4 F F F F F F F F M N O lD lD M O Lf) r m O v M O O O 0 01 O O O (D O O O O F o qr r Ln r aD �D r-I o lD 0) aD o 0 0 0 o o O o 0 0 o o z F Eli z N N In r N o r 0 o ri o o Ln Ln Ln E 0 r a (1) I'D r rn o N c OD r o 0 0 N r u-) co M o v c >+ O Q' r O M M V' cl' m l0 M %.D M l0 CD O -+ CD Ln r M M r Q Na N ri r O O rn m 0 O N O r1 CD r O N a a a a a a a a O rt r.> < Q < < < Q N N U U U U U U U U U U U U U U z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z O O 0 0 0 0 U S T S Z S T > U U U U U U U U w W w w w w w w z z z z z z --�X Z X X X X E-F F E-F F -1 1----1--� u 0 u 0 0 0 m m 0 0m m< < Cn Cn < z< F E-• P P F E-F F F z E Z Z X Z X H H H H H H H F F z z z F O F z z z " z z z z O O 0 W O 0 O O Z 0 z i E >+ F a E-+ H H H F CL F 0 0 UP U U U U U U a, a, a, a, a, a, a, H to U)cn z z z z z z z H a, z z z z z z x z z x x m x x x z a s 0 a H H H H H H H 0 Vi O F F F O < O E- F F E-• F E+ F F a 0 U U U 0 a 0 U U U U U u U U z U O1 0+ 0+ 01 01 d a a a a a a a Z G] Z w w w z Z Z w w w w W w w w H CO H hi H H H H < Q < Q << Q W CQ W I-D "'D I-) w a W P-� P-) h �D h h t") P-) w a a a a a a U U U U U U U> x> 0 0 0> a> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W w W w w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 O w m z a W Cl)0 0 0 0 0 0 a a a a a a a U a w w ate, w aa, w w w EL w r 0 W u) ,--4 > 1 > m N O I I I 1 I I I 1 z z x .-i r-I aD DD m 0 aD m m O w rn rn rn H 0 H 0 r r r r r r I'D �D l0 lD lD lD t.0 OD r r r r, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H z N N N N N N N N N N N N N m r- 4 -I . r O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N l0 M N N N N N N N N H x Q z a4 < W ao a 1 0 0 E4 F a O O o 0 0 0 O 0 O O O O 0 O M [M O o O O O O O O N O W O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O Ln Ln O lD O O O O O O m O fJa O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U-) Ln u-) tD O O O O O O u) O E 0 r r r r r r r r r r r r r rn rn rn m Ln ,n ,n ,n m u-) Ln Ln Ln z I'D � t�o 1D k�o I'D lD %D -.0 k.0 I Q' O O O M O O O O O O O O N N E-4N N N N N N N N N N N 110 lD I'D 10 �D tD I.D %.0 kD %D z O O O O O O O O O O O O O I 01 ao OD M N N In r M vT M M D O O O O O O O O O O O O O In O CD W LO .--+ O O 07 O .-1 M r 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O N r lD lD r r r �D r r t0 l0 U U In O III O u-) O O Un O in O Ln O r1 r I r1 ri H < N N M M N N M M c O O O O O O CD O O O O O O Q, Q, a, Q, U U U U U U U U U U U U U a z z z z z z z z z z z z z < H H H H H H H H H H H H H Or Cn U U U U U U U U z z z z z z z z z > > > > > > > O O . H . . H H 1--I FA M x x x a a a a x a x a a a O W W W W W W W W W w W W W H o F' Q O O O O O O O O a a a a a a a a a a a a a a H m w co m m m En m < Q< a< Q Q a a< a z Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q H H H H H H H )--1 H H H H H 1 U U U U U U U U U U U U U W x x x x La w w w .a w w w w Ea• z z z z z z z z z z z z z a U U U x < a< a a<< a<< a< Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a z z z z z z z z z z z z z z a z a a W H H H H H H H H H H H H H H FT 3 3 3 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >4 a E4 EL Ev E4 44 E24 E34 Ez, EL E, Cu Ez C., z < < < a z z z CG CL a m CL 0 z z z w w w w w w w w w Q. ii W H H H H H H H H H H H H H a+ < 0 z z z z z z z z z z z z z E-4 z z z X U U U U U U U V U) z E E E z a a x z z z z z z z z z F Ez, W z 0 > o O o 0 0 00 CD o 0 o O o 0 0 0 , O '+ 4 ri ,-, r-I ,4 ,...I r-4 ,� .7 ,-I r-i r-4 r-I ri .-+ ,1 -1-1, j . 4 .-, � M � � r-I r, 0 >+ CD CD O o o O o 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 O F Z Z Z Z Z z z z z z z z z F 3 3 3 X U U U U U U U U U " D n m n m n n D m `J m 0 m Q Q Q Q w H H H H H H H H < U x x Z x x z X E x z E x x Z z z z z z. z z z z z z z 025 015 2 N M 17 U) lD r m m O l0 r .-1 (14 m 0) H N C' M U1 ao r r r r r r r r m U-)tf) m ao t( ) 1p N ,n U') E-1 z 0 c ri OD U M (') M M m M M M m O O M m O O O O r r r O W F r1 ri 1-4 r 4 ri ri .--4 ri 1--4 r-4 .-+ 1-4 ri .-1 ri ri ri O O 0 C� m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m CD m m co m a s F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F E-F F 1.0 • O O O O O O O O O v O O O O Lr) O O M Lr) r+ F Z F Ln O o 0 0 0 0 0 Ln m o O L o r o m O m W z r O O U1 o O O N ri O O r Un N l0 E O m r e-4 .--1 O M Co O Ln O O O r ri 114 N O in Ul a' r-1 N M m M r" 1 m -1 ,-4 1-4 e1 -1 m Q 0 { M U) O Q' Cl H O O M O m Ln r O m o 10 o C7 1- r ri a a a a a a a a a N z O r M o <., w o � � a s a a a a a a a � M W rq U U U U U U U U U -4 a U ,n £ H z H z H z H z . z H z H z H z H z 1-4 x x x x x x x x x 0 U w U U U U U U U U. U z U W W W W W w W W w < z to O O O F E-1 F F F F F F F H a U ��- a a s F Z H a a s W a a ] a F F E-+ F F F F F F< O< Z< 2< W < �< W < O O O Q O W H U C� C7 C� C7 u 0 u 0 F Z F E U xZ F < xZ F CO F W F cr. F E F U H x x E z z x z x z O w< a O cn H CL z U z Z F F z �� a F a H xZ F z a W OH F F F F F E- F F F O O H Z Z O U U O U O z O U O ELIO a x U U U U U U U U U 0 .-a o a w w 0 >> o < o o Z)> o U D 0 z U w w w w w w w w w z < z F i Z z U) xn z z z m z CZ z < z a H CO h h h h h ll-) h h h w m W z O O w W F W E W F W w W W w o o O O O O O o 0> H> z z z> a a> z> H> v, > a> > O a s xZ z a z xz z% z O O O 0 O W z H z w w a a a a a a a' al w < G z a s U a H w U W H O O W > > m 1 1 1 1 1 d> lD r l0 N z z x I -+ .1 ri ,-a ri O r O N O O O a. a, H w H O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 O N In m O r r H z O O O O O O O O O O l0 W r O O Q H x N N N N N N N N N M r1 r -i ri r 1 ,..� < z a < as w m xZ 1 0 O w F a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o M M 0 0 0 0 lD O N O o w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 o M O 0) O r, 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o Lr) kV o O 0 0 0 In O m v In a-) In In u') U) T M rn rn M m r r r rn r M z o 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 O lD l0 O M O M 0 F Ol l0 l0 l0 l0 t10 l0 01 w W W l0 l0 N N lD l0 110 r z m N M c Lr) �o m m N M r v1 Nr O O cr) ri N N () O O m l0 M l0 r lD r r r r m Ln U7 u) in Ui O O O O O O Lr) U lD l0 W w w v M M c O O ri r 1 N -4 r 1 U Q .1 O r-1 O r-1 ri ri r 4 r-4 ri 1 H r-1 r-1 r-+ O U-) O O O O O O O O O 0 O M ri O O O O O c c v IT r•+ ri .1 ri r r ri ri H F a U U U U U U U U U w a Z z z Z z z z Z Z a U U U H H H H H H H H H W z z z F M O U U U U U U U U U F Z 11 " F1 p: w O O O O O O O O O O W m U) xn cn U Q 'n m cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn U W w w W , a w m Q m a m m Q m m m m m w w n a a Q< Q<< w . a a < a a o its w �s �s w w w w a Q 3 z W h z z z z z z z z z U) � U) U)i z H E O H a z O O O O O O O O O w m m z E- w F z R: H Cn Cn Ui U) C!� (� C/) a a a a �+ o 01 rz w x w a a cZ rz a xZ xLcoo �' w a a a x x w x w x w x w x w x w w x z z 0 o 0 0 0 o z z w a< a o O U U U U U U U U U H F F F w w a x w fOA w co z H z H H H H H H H H a D z z 3 3 < O O w x F [*•1 w z z z z z z z z O O O O O O w h z o F 0 26 z O 0 > e1 r-1 .1 r-1 -1 ,-i ri .1 ri o 0 o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O >+ O r 1 O ri O ri O O O O O O O O O O N N 1-4 .-• O N N O F U U U ri U ri U ri U .-1 U -1 U .1 U 1-4 H r-1 F r-1 F r-1 F W W 4 z E• O 3 0 H U" < U H z H z 11 z H H H H H H O O O O O O a w z z z z z z c n0. a 016 z aO M M .T m m C' �D LO �D lD Ln r m m Ln Lo Ln 4.0 N lD �D m m [- m m m m O m rn rn I- 0� 0 F z c N m O w U F O (n M r--1 H O O O O O 0 () a s Q 00 m F m m F E-4 m E-4 m E-4 m E• m m E• E-+ m E-+ r-4 -1 m m F E4 -4 m F m F m F •--4 m F r1 m F r� m F O m F -4 m F .--� m F M • •"'� F m 0 OLO O r m Q' o O O o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O r o 0 0 0 W z O Q M N -4 CV c r N r-i u7 H (V o O lD 0 0 N T Q• cT 0 O M to l0 r+ m m to r lD m r-4 M N O O O O O O O N r tD (V M M Q� N M a E < M � LO H M '� N ri lD O m (V N m M N r-+ O 1 lD m N r1 O O O M O O N O N a0 N 1 m Lr) H N O al E-F 0 F 0 F 0 F 0 01 lD U) W p 0) M cn a H r„ 0 a Q Q >; u>� a w con a a O a. a. con a a con a a a x a 0 Ea. W O H O U O E-� O F O F p F Z H 0 Z H H 0 H O x x x x H z 0F. O z O z O z O F O F F O F a W F O F a ~ O a H a a O C7 U a% O M W a O cn fx O `� U W x z U U W w Jr U w U U w w x x U W x U w x F z U 0 O F U O F U O F U O m O O E-ra U O LOW E O E. O C] z H w cn E z z W F z F 0 z W " a a 0 z w z0 H < z [t7 x U x x U U x U U U z z U z U z n x z F w m a F m Cl- F o a F m 0 z w 0 x F 0 z W 0 a O E4 O H < > cn F m N > 04 U) > a, a > a a 04 E a, < < a a < a < a > z 0 z 0 z 0 z o > cn z > U w a W > E. w w o x r O 0D cx > I > m H O O c O c M CD rn o aD m z H O H z 1- 4 E O z d 01 -r r- r O m r O M H O r� O M O M N ri N M M N 01 N r m M M N Cr r yr r O lD [� O lD 0 M lD O m lD m N yp H .�( Q z N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O rn O M O m O m m co a < w w w a 1 0 o r" E+ 0: w O o O 0 O 0 O 0 o rn r u) [- r r r r O O 0 0 N O tD cn E o 0 0 0 0 U-) Ln uO u) Ln Ln Ln u) Un Ln ,n Ln ,n un 0 o 0 Ln 0 (D o Ul m Ln o O r un O z r IT \D 0) O lD 0) O l0 M O H N O 01 01 O O a> O Ol O Cl Q1 O O Ol O 01 O Ol O a> 0 01 0 v 01 0 F z 0 0 M Ln M M r lD In r lD r r Ln M tD r-1 un N �D N Ln c �D lD N N Lo un 110 N un w w N N ,n ,n lD N ,n W N ,n w m m w m m lD m m I'D m m w N o lD 0 lD 0 U Q O r-I O Q' O V' O r1 O r•-1 O r-1 v C O O r1 r1 c O r-1 yr c O O r•-1 e--1 c O r-i V• O r1 lD O V• lD O C' lD O Q• �D O IT N O r-i r-� O r� M O ,-•� 0 H 0 H x O cn Gr M14 W U W U rz 0 H a 0 0 N U a >> O U U H O 0 O O w 0 O m O O O O cq U 1 cn as a W W w m w. z w w z z w z w w z z w z w z 0 z 0 z c� z 0 z Fo H z 0 w H a z z F Q O Q O U 0 a a U H a U U H H rz a U H a U U H H a a U H a U H a H m H m H n H n x cam„ Q o U n1 H < H H CO U) H Cl) m C7 cn cn w 1 W w I w w w w w cn cn cn cn z >+ F C] H a a< a O a, w w O w 0 x .4 z w I m wm I I 1 cQn cQn I m I can O U O U O U O U H a E-. U > a 14 U E-4a rs z w F w a a a a s �d a a a a a a a a a a a z O O O > o N O un O O u7 O O O to O o a O 0 N CD 0 0 N N 0 N o O N N O N O N o O o O O CD 0 CD 0 O o N O O 027 H Q U a a O s a z a 0 � O O m cn a� O cn a CD cn cn a ag O cn a O cn -1 C4 a r- 4 [u a -1 Us a -40 Cu a w a > a 1-4 > ag a 017 z O H Q' r4 N O M N M V' Ln t0 r co :n lD r c aO r r r r r r r r r to F z 0 c � � x ao U o o r r r o r 0 0 0 o 0 o O r r r r o w F r, r- o 0 0 r-1 o ,-1 -4 ''1 r-4 —1 r, 1-4 0 o O 0 U < ao OD Ib m ao ao co co co m co Ib m Ib m nm m o QW aQ go F E-E-+ E- F F F F F F F F F F E- E- E- F M O tD O tD r H O O O O O O O M aJ u-) .n �n H F Z F w m O N N O O O O O o O O t0 M r r N W Z 0 r o c M M m 0 O O Ln MC� to x O o o rn N r o o r o M r .-+ r N I'D o ?+ < -4 N Q1 N . . WN N O r� O v O O O M OD Ln O Tn O O O t0 M a H r, a O 0 t0 C0 to U o ul tD tD H W C' rn .-i .-i r-1 r r, r U z U z H M .-a 1-4 ❑ < F -1 O a cn ❑ U a H >• > 0 a m F IX a E+ a a a U U U U U a W a a a F F H 0 < 0 < < > > > > > < 0 < < < Z z z U cn F z F a F F w w w cn cn F ❑ F F F U H H x of < 0 o of < w FO a x x ac x a FO Fo E- co U E- F F M E-H O U U U U U H H a o O a < Ix co z F Z w w w w w z = Z > CL co (Y Z w F O H Ono 3 0 O U O x x x x x 0 cn p cn O W O w CD H > IX ❑ -� O MO ❑ p U U U U U❑ a o ❑ H❑ F< z U << z F Z a a O z Z z z W z rz z .I z ❑ a❑ H(n a a w cn W E E F W F W z z z z z w m W E4 w a LO a a W F F > z > < < cn > co > < < < < < > > 0 > a > E m H ❑ x X O F F O z a a a a a W UW U)w w ul w U cn U)U H a a a a a a con 3 U W M rn �r rn H p 0L 110 'A O 4 ,� O O I > 14 M co l0 C• M c O) m M z H p z H E O N O r-i t0 N I to N I lD N I N N c N c N c N v Ln r Ln N 61 M tD O t0 O lD O p H H x z Li. Q .-4 O -1 O 1-1 O I r-•i O I ri O I r♦ O I -4 O I -4 O r-4 O x r 1-4' O � tD O r O r 0 r a z a < ca w ao a 1 O O w E-H rz w In w M o O 0 N r r r r r O o 0 —4�0 In r r u-) o 0 0 0) 0 0 0 0 0 In Lrn U') 0 O O Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln o to o o m Q1 0) r 1 r 1 r Q1 Un an Ln to Ln Ol U-) M 01 m 0) z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M o 0 0 0 F l0 lD tD r r r lD lD t0 tD t0 tD tD r tD tD tD z a .-I o r-i O N -+ H N c IT c v IT N M M N N N O M M r In Ln Ln o Ln Ln Ln u*) Ln O U-) o o O U M M M m -1 N in Ln U-) U < O O O O O O O O O 1-4 O -1 O 1-4 O H O H O H O O O O .--1 r-i -1 r 1 -1 e-i -1 .--1 -4 r-4 r-1 r 1 Ln to to EU E" O U U U U U W F4 H H H H U U U H H a s < � Q� a a a a z H H H w W E- vi cwn cwn vwi M U)U)O cFn co M . o 0 >I >4 04 U) a cx z z z z Z In E+ F z W W G] z H H H H H Qom. a Q z O z Q M m oa O a a a a a g 3� 00 a F co CQ m cn w w w w w a F F F 1 U U F w W w w W 2 w w w a za s rz z Z Z z 2 z z z z W F W W F W W W W H H H H u H 0 O [,. F F F co" z p❑ z 0 0 p O z z z z z F H H ❑ H H H z W W W W W < W W W W >4 < a a s ° a z a F z z z z z a w F x x x a s x O w >> w > w >>> w w F O 0 x 0 x 0 x 0 x 0 x z EE- cz E E-Kc E-F a p F-I H H FI H H U << Q Q1 `, 4 O O O cn F 44 z W rz a Ix a x cz cn cn cn cn v, cn cn cn cn cn z O 0 > 0 O 0 O N u-) U-) Ln un o 0 0 0 o o O o o r r r O YI ri r-i '-i N M N M N M O N 0 1.4 0.0 ri r-i O 0 Ln O O -4 O O O U U F H > > > > > > CQ x x x ri x '-a x Q N >4 O FL O =) O ❑ O ❑ < U H a H a H rz H Z H Z H p rS Q' < *cn < < U x E O O O m rz cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn z a0 m O r m O r m .1 N co rn r-i r N r M 0) Q' rn LI) 0) r rn m rn M r N m \0 rn r Ln r r m H Z 0 a � � OD o w x U F r o r o o 0 o M r o r o M ri M r, M r, M M r o M r r o C7 a s a m H m H m m H F m H m H m H m H m H m H m H m H m H m H r� m H r1 m H 0 m H 0 m H -� m H M r1 H O O 0 O U() O N Ln cT lD l() r-i O O O N u) r m m N Ln r UD v Ol O O m O) O W xO z O r a> r l0 t0 0) r M �D r c r O r O O co r1 O O a a x N 4�--� r4 v� M c .-i Ln O M r M Ln M M 0 u-) a) r 0 l() r o N c 0) o O r M N lD M O %10 r N T) m r r-� .-, r al M m N rn (14 z O > U) > U) Z O H H a C� z C� Z P .Fa U z U H Hu U a H .: F F E4 F W .a H .7 H .7 a FO ] a .4 0 H a 0 .a P HO C, a D a U m O a .a a c9 Z W o v>i E MM0 O H F o O F F 0 H cn cWn z H U) U) 0 H �G a H O a f+ m W H H a= W W m O U U M O a < .`na rt cz 0 >>> U) to U) cz O cn W cn W a O U) w or 0 UU)i U) a H s O U U a 0 a > z H CY. U U) F O a 0 ,a F F O O a a 0 z W > U) > (n 0 z w H cz W H z W 0 z W 14 z w z w z 0 z w H a a H a a. 0 z W H .a a 0 z w a a F 0 z .a aZ a z 0 z 0 z U) w 0 x, o U H z m F, M o o U U > cn a U) s > H a H s > 0 x 0 x 0 x > a a. z > a z > cn x> z W W > o H a o F s w > a cL w W rz U) U) cn m W z z a U W H o a Ln \0 m M r m m U-) m U') m M r r n ,1 o > 1 z F-4 0 > z F-A W WC x 0 l0 -1 11 w O 14 1-4 Ln Ufa N N r-4 r-i .-i r-I Ln N m l0 r N N N m (V N m N .-4 N r M r a N r M 0 M M 1 O O m 1 O O m M O N Ln O m N r-i N O N H 0 H x z O r O r O O r r N o m o m m T CO qw m m O O m N l0 I'D Ln �D a• l0 O QI a z a r> ao w m rz 1 0 0 w H a w r� o t0 m 0 l0 r-+ lD 0 0 l0 l0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O o 0 Ln M Lr) U-) o 0 O o 0 O 0 0 O o 0 O O o O rn r1 N o o 0 lD cx lD cW o O O �i z 0) O Ol O Q1 01 O O w 0) N m N 01 O lD Ol O 01 O l0 tf) M l0 Lr) M l0 r i O r r O r M O M O M O O1 r i 01 1-4 Ol 0 H z O o N O Ln N O Ln N N O O Ln Ln r u') (Y) N O N m m l0 m m l0 Ln r l0 (n Un M � r N O r i N O i r N O N N O O r M � �O 0 O t0 (=) O lD LO � U U a N O In N O Ln N N O O lit In r-4 O O O Q' O C' O Q' O —4 O r-4 O 1-4 r O r-� O r-� O O r1 N O r-� Ln O Un ul O In M O U U U U U H U H z H Z H z z H H O U O U U U >+ U z >. U z a 0 O s 0 O M o O U) x 0 U) x U) U) x x U) < �' co a H z = H z x w a W z C7 a U Ln 0 0 0 H ~ H w 0 w 0 c) u U) u 1 z z z z U U CD u U) (n a U) 2 Fi x H a w H H P w P w P E w w 0 0 o a HP W U) w U) w H a s >1 Ol a S x 3 x 3 3 m x a w x s w s Q .a x Q a x H H H H H (n W W m z z z z 0 Ho a s a U) x 0 0 z H 0 0 cn H 0 0 v) H H 0 z 0 0 H a 0 H o 0 H 0 0 H o 0 " m a w a z a a a w s H a a z s z a z s z H a OU H 0 z 0 W > r r cn cn r r U) o U) 0 U) U) U) cn U) UF) UH) U)i U)) (n con con 0 O >+ U H U H a U 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r� 0 0 0 r-1 o 0 0 0 o r i 0 0 0 o r o o 0 r� 0 x a 0 0 m a 0 ri 0 m a 0 Ln O a< PH 0 Un o o u� ri < H uO r 0 z o u� r 0 z 0 o m 0 z 0 0 m o z 0 0 o 029 r-+ U) 0 W m m m cn U) m m U) U) cn U) cn cn cn cn U) cn H 019 z �o r m M 0 M •a Lo� m m 4 a) N 0 r, a0 r r r r m m m m m m rn m m m 0) rn H z 1-4 a m U r r r r r O O O 0 O M r O r O O o w H 0 0 0 0 0 ,-1 -4 1.4 .--I ,--4 .--a o 1.4 o -4 C7 �t m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a s HE-4 E» H H H H H H H H H H H H H M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o u) o 0 0 0 0 H z H N m O O O L O O LO r O O O LC)O W z N M M U-) O N N m O 01 z O m W 7 r r w N r r-+ .-4 O N N m O >•+ O N N N m r M O O 110 L M M 1-4 m aLO N Ln M M 4 r O O O O O U) O O O O O O Lr) O U) U) r O O O Lr) O O Q) m N N m O N O) N Ul M m U 0 N N m O M r U) U) N l0 a U) M M 1-4 m rl) w W r W H r-I r N I a s H Q z O O _4 I W cn W U) H £ 0 H U 0 m N m N .] U U U U 4 Un .a .4 U a > a O 4 H I > > > > a < o o a< >< 0 a N a a s < a > a z E-H v) U) M H a H Q< a a H En H E H ', H O H H H Hp U) HO 0 0 O 00 O 0 0 a o a o 0 W" H z z z z H a E-H U) U) v) H x H a H H H U) H a H - H J4 FF U H a 0 0 0 0 H W W W W U 0 x z O a U U U U o UM o U o m o On H o DO a o U o z U z w w w w z z z z z z z z O z cn z z a z W z z H U) W a a a a W H W H H H H W z W W w z w a w H w H W z w W o > m w m m > cn > x x x x > < > p > p > ,..•-, > (n > a > < > z z z z W o 0 0 0 ,4 H In, a z 0 .4 w w a > m H U a v r r r r H o m - 0 W O m m m m IT M > I > m O O O O O z z x I CD O CD CDM co r•N) N H o H o r r r r U) cn cn cn .-a o M I H z m rn a)m H H H H m r+ Qx Lr) U') Ln LO O U U U U N N O O Q z a < m W m a 0 0 w H a o o t.0 �.0 v 0 0 0 0 r 0 N 0 N c r W 0 O U') U) M 0 o O O c O N O m O a O U) V) Lr) l0 O O O O Lr) O m O Ln �0 O m m m m Q) r r r r U) M U7 M m 0) Lr) z O o O O O w l0 O O O O O o O O 0 H l0 %0 t0 l0 t0 N N l0 l0 l0 r l0 r l0 l0 w z O m m N N -4 O O r-+ T N -1 M N M v O m l0 m l0 LO C Ln V Lr) 0 o O O U) O Lr) N O J7 U) U N O O O) m M N N N N 1--I M RC O .-i O O O O c o O O O O O O O O c C H r r M M H ,--4 i ,-i .- A U U U U Z W U U U U O O O O p z z z z U H H H H H Q < Q Q H U) V) V) U) H W M z z HHHH Up cn z z 00 0 a a a a z z z z a' O U Q z E O O O Z F-1 H H H H o z z z z m p m p m p m m a 0 H E-4 E+ z Li W p o o p z a a a a x H Q o O z W H U U U U H H H H U in H O a H .4 z w w w w O 44 d4 a4 x w 0.0, w D Q 3 O z M H o J4 �4 a4 x z z z z z a 0 O U w >4 OI r>r a Q<< a li. U w a a a a m m m m o o H X U ar>r o H H H H z o > ai cn v� ca Ui a M z H H H H H > > > 3 o x o H w w z O > O CDCD O O O O O � O O 01 O O OO O 0 >• -4 --1 1-1 � �-, 0 � U) al r U*) � 0 0 -4 o 03( U H 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-q 0 ,� U H a a x x a m m m m z o > cn o a 0 4 O > > > 0 031 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 2:36PM 08/09/01 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 46319 08/09/01 CAL065 CALIF JOINT POWERS INS 46320 08/09/01 COA075 COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED 46321 08/09/01 MOU200 MOUNT SAN JACINTO WINTER 46322 08/09/01 VER200 VERIZON CHECK TOTAL PAYMENT AMOUNT 400.00 338729.25 495.60 2537.32 342,162.17 032 ozz zz N to m C Ln 1,0 r fZ 0 H Z Q1 O OD O W H www a s H H H H H H H H rn N •• O o u') O m O N N cN H O O N z H W Z O O 01 01 01 r N �+ O CVO CD N CN r a� Q, 00 M M M r Q 00 N a Q cn (n O u7. O N O N l0 rn O N m p; m c r Q w Ln 00 z a N z z H r-) r U OU z � E, F H W U E-+ a w w < < W z Q 0 < O 14 O O u O w E U H << z U U U U H a z z a z a H rX > > > > rz O a £ O❑ O❑ cn cn cn � 0 H .a 00 z U z z Q z W W W W z "u) x x W to W "W z z z z W cl�> 0 0 0 0> ❑ H H> �> w w a s a a a a a U W H ❑ a r c 01 0 > I > CQ l0 O l0 z z M rn N M H ❑ F-4 -4 r '� z r r r ❑ x Ln r r r a < m w m a I 0 o w H x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ao 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O r r cn rr) un u) u) rn z M M N O M Cn m o 00 r H z a' -4 N to M M c M O O O O u) to u-) r O am N ,--i Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ a w w cn uJ H F, z z [s. z H H H H 3 a 0 x x 0 o w w H a a �C a a U Q z z a z o o a < w" '� '� a cn z z z z < w o 0 0 0 a w w H N N N N o U z H . H H a� a s o a a rx a .a U U to H w Z W UO > > > > z 0 > Lr) U-) uO 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ �0 �0 r o 0 0 0 0 0 >+ O O O N N N N N U H< O O W W W W > > > r N �.0 N Nr Cl) a d H 0 H H z W E >4 a 033 023 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 46317 08/07/01 AQU100 AQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC 46318 08/07/01 PET005 CASH/PETTY CASH CHECK TOTAL 1:58PM 08/07/01 PAGE 1 PAYMENT AMOUNT 153.00 150.00 303.00 024 Z N a 0 E• Z 0 0 OD o a w LLQ a a LM H E" Ln • O o E+ O O Z E- W z M O O LO u') >+ 0 a Q O O O O 1+ o U-) u-) a W co z w z W H Is, 0 z �q U .a z EE, .4 EQ o o o W CO a U E-+ H 0 ., aL' 0 > x Q w 0 z U z u z H fn a W Z w o > a s U) E-4 U w Lu 0 w I > co z z x H 0 H ,'D H Z � x a. < co w co rz 1 0 0 Lu E� a O o w O O ao O O O M 01 Z O V N E• z M O O Ln O O N O U U < .a O O U H La H U m < 0 a4 0 u, w x a x U) Q H Q U LL O �+ W E-4 a z E--f IM H >4 124 a a w O Q u a U)z z Q U E� La w z 0 9 O u) O O 0 >+ O O E3 U U a O O r' O M a E� 0 E- E- z W E a 035 025 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 11:51AM 08/06/01 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** PAYMENT AMOUNT 46295 08/06/01 BAX100 DAN BAXLEY 50.00 46296 08/06/01 BECO10 DEBORAH BECHARD 50.00 46297 08/06/01 BOU100 MICHELE BOUDREAU 50.00 46298 08/06/01 CAL040 CALIFORNIA VISION SERVICE 1048.47 46299 08/06/01 CAN050 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO 548.88 46300 08/06/01 FIL100 GIA FILICE 50.00 46301 08/06/01 LAQ050 LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES 416.00 46302 08/06/01 LEW010 TOM LEWIS 50.00 46303 08/06/01 LOU100 ELSE LOUDON 50.00 46304 08/06/01 MAH100 CYRILLE P MAHFOUD 50.00 46305 08/06/01 MOU100 DONALD J MOULIN 50.00 46306 08/06/01 OLA100 MILTON OLANDER 50.00 46307 08/06/01 OSBO50 LEE M OSBORNE CPA 50.00 46308 08/06/01 PRI050 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL 43122.80 46309 08/06/01 REB050 JOAN REBICH 50.00 46310 08/06/01 REY050 ELAINE REYNOLDS 50:00 46311 08/06/01 RIV040 RIVERSIDE CNTY DEPT CHILD 426.50 46312 08/06/01 SHA040 ROSITA SHAMIS 50.00 46313 08/06/01 STJO10 VICTORIA ST JOHNS 50.00 46314 08/06/01 SUP100 SUPPORT PAYMENT CLEARING- 150.00 46315 08/06/01 UNIO05 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 179.00 46316 08/06/01 UNUO50 UNUM LIFE INS 2894.87 CHECK TOTAL 49,486.52 036 026 z < - l0 4 O N .-+ N 00 r r ri N .-� r • r~ O r I O F Z �O O co O W C� u F < w W W rn rn E E O F F F F F F F F F F M —4 —4 F z w F Z O O O � O O O Ln O O O uO r Co v cD co Co c O O , O Ln O O lD O O O U) O O O O O O O O O O O 0 �+ O E 00 Ln ,� Ln Ln Ui Ln a o 0 O 0 o 0 r ao m 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 C7 z 0 Ln C) z 0 Ln Z o m CD 0o qr LO a m o Ln 0 O CQ o Ln Z o Lrn a O W o `U-)O a m o Ln cz O m E O E O E O O Q O z O O O Z U Cn F a < F U U > a Q F U U > a Q F+ a < F w.a U Z Q F H > 0 < a Q F U a a s 2 F U) H > 0 < a Q F+ O U cn F a F cn H > 0< < a EF U) H > 0< < a F cn H > C] w U O H cx < O F cn O F cn >+ O F cn Z O F O F F Z O F 1 • s4 O F F O F 04 Q O F F O F-F F O F rS F H O > a H a a < a s 0 0 F H Z a O 0 F H Z a" O W Z a O 0 cn z Ho a 0 W E Ho a O 41 t0 -,.I a O o w E Ho a O a < C r s O 0 w E HO a O w E a O w E z H U to w O F a Z W > o E E z W > E z G] > O H cn Z W > W Z W > V)z w > W > o a z G] > U)z W > w > M F a z W > V) W > z W > EFn W > z W > U) W > V) W [sr 0 0 U O U O U H > H a H CL H U H H H U W H D O a w O CD N O O N O 0 N c c o N 0 O CD O O O o O O > I Z H 0 H > Z H CQ E M Z >+ a a a p� O l0 Ln a N >+ a a N >+ a N >+ a N >+ a N >+ a 0 H x h h h 0 OD rOj h h O h O h a h �C Z C4 r� W W 0] C4 I O O Ga F CG w m o 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 E am am rn Ln r rn 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 z O O O () m O N rn O rn O rn O 0, O rn Cl F Z 0 Lr)in 1-4 V) r-I to in r-I in N O O N O O al ri Ul N O Ui Ln r-I �n U) ri Ln 1-4 O U N N N O O r i 0 0 Ul U7 U7 Ul U) U < r-I O ri .--I 0 ri ri O . a .-i 0 r I e--I O i ri 0 r-4 H O .--I o ri 0 r1 o ri O r-4 o W U O cq W > W U W 0 O 0 0 o 0 a Cl)Z z o < a a E W C] D a a a z w o n > F x a w < a z >• a w o w W W H U �C U)n0 z o E z a Co H >Q• a x m a w w z a o a �. E" z M H a 0 o a n, W h O 04 < a 0o z O CQ U H a z Q E W U)Cx a rI z o a c z o o E u u 0 a o w o zo 0 O H U H > 0 0 r-I �C 0 r4 O U 0 0 � M o c a O LO O Q o o H 0 � o a 0 ri o 0 0 —4 Co 0 1-4 0 0 r-I b37 U W CWA cco U U Cu a ,Wj O0 E 027 qz M LO 1.0 N a) N m m m (L O N N H z 1-4 0 N x OD U C) ON a) rn rn rn o W H E m 0) E (M E m m rn 0 < w am 0) W W rn W W rn rn am al< m F F F F F F F F F H H cw 00 fn O Ln Ll) O O O O O O O r -+ E-F o m co O 0 Ln o 0 0 o m . t z Er W z o r c o o o 0 o rn Ln lqr � `n U')N u'I u) Ln r rn O r- rC oo c .� -� ao CL M N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r O o co O o Ln o 0 0 o m o cz o N o o ❑ o o as o rn Un Ln N (D Ln C7 Ln N C7 u) 0 0 Ln r rn 0 4 z z > z z cn ,-, .-, m m Cl) E- � a E ON W w O O 00 H ❑ H U U U U z U U z F+ P4 > z z a a a cz ] . a a s " a a a ❑ a a< a U a a in Q U Q a Q z a < z E-F < H m a E-+ > H H H (7 F H H > H u F ❑ H F. 0 0 O m❑ O V) 0 a 0 1 0 cz 0 U) 0 i O 1 O cn O W H H H EF < F H < H H H H Z E-F O F z z z to }, y4 �4 H a cz w cz H ri cx H a a rx 41 a a cz H cz 4-1 a a z O H 0 E o o 0 < o V) o z o o o ❑o>Z ❑ H❑ xa❑ z❑ z❑ -�❑ z 1 E• z U z co z F< z z z ❑ Z ❑ Z z z M z ❑ z ❑ z a Z r+ CO w W W a H W z w H W W H W z W w co W w > > > < z > 2: > a > cz > a > x > cC > a > ❑ > ❑ z W w O ❑ 0 0 E• H x❑ U U a U U a a cn W 44 O O O ❑ a o i i 0 0 0 0 0 O W N o O N N N N v > i > m r r z z E >+ o o 10 ❑ a r, a a � rn a a ao o x h z z � ID 1 r, o Q z a < w m m a O o w E-F rz o 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 w O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E .7 Ol .--1 M Ol Q1 � Ol Ql e1 In Ol Z O M M o O N 0 O N (N M Ln N N Ln U') N Ln al N N N H z -4 O 0 -1 .--+ O .--i 1-1 O o Cl 5 u') O O Ln in O Ln al O O O 0 O O N N O N N O O O < o 0 0 o O O o O o 0 0 a C7 E+ z z W U cz cn M w o a 0 � U a W 0 a s o z x 'n U Q< cn x F F a z O z H O w 0 cn CY. E E x z U H N H W z m a s � W w x w < w m , 0 w w w a ❑ cn H 3 rs. Q H H F H � a E U U a z a F o o a w cn °< a � za ❑ a s o 0 0z Mz a > n M H w w z 0 > O O O O O O O O o U-) O O Ln ul in Ln Un v v .-i O O Ln O >+ O O O O O O O O � O O U F m H H m > < h a H U H cn (L' f1' W W F-1 < U o a a cz zzU)U) ai D 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 46291 08/02/01 AD0010 DON ADOLPH 46292 08/02/01 DIS050 DISNEYLAND 46293 08/02/01 IMPO10 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 46294 08/02/01 RAP050 RAPID DATA INC CHECK TOTAL 11:10AM 08/02/01 PAGE 1 PAYMENT AMOUNT 1058.38 363.00 12754.29 178.47 14,354.14 029 z N M cW In �o r m m o .4 PC O E z 0 N O 0 U U O (4 E E E £ E E E E E E E E C� Q W W W W W W W W w W W a Im E F E-F F E F E E E E-E E O •• OD O v' Lr) N �o O M c' Lo r r1 rl E z E (M o aD lD w c N O r r v W z C�, M N 1- N M 11 10 Un O C1 E D LO ko Ln LO r .-4 m v c DD r >+ O O M r r in L) '--1 c O N N OD e-1 -+ OD o rn r M O N a' co O In cn I'o U o F M r- p WCN U U a H O a x W y� w a U a a a > > > O W O EQ-4 O > > > > > O U O W" > E F E cn cn cn cA F a E " a 9 a rx U U U U U U U U cz w a 0" E O 0 O H H H H H H H H 0 > a 0 Q 0 z a w a a z w x a w z U D z z H E F F E 4 E E-F E•+ Z C7 Z H C7 E w a w U U U U U U U U w z w W H > H > W W W W W w W W > > 0 w a a a a a a a a a w w x F w W w W W w W w E M H 0 a cn co cn M to U) En %D W > 1 > m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Z E H H H H H H H -4O H 0 a a x a x a o r H z 0 x > > > > > > > L N Q z a � w ao a 1 0 o w E w O o O m N M v In to 0 ,n w o O o ,-1 M k.o ko %o ko o -, m o O E D r M r r r r r r r r rn Z M O N N N N N N N N o E w r Wt.0 w%.0 w w �o w z 1.4 m M c' -T c V' c V' N N D o 11n in LO u'f In LO Ln LO O Ln OU N v c v v c C c N M U rC O o O O O O O O O O O -4 r-4 4 r-4 � .-1 F E F E E E E-+ E w U) m m Cn L7 C7 H 0 H 0 H 0 H U H 0 H 0 H 0 H 0 M O O O O O O O O o H H H . H H H H O E F E E H E E a' (<7 C4 7 C<7 7 (4 Cal C47 U z Z H H. H H H H H Q 14 E a .ZE ►ow a < << Q<QQO aq H Q o a 0 a >� w H rz H a H z H w H w H m H w H z 0 Q x z w w w w w w w w H Ow o z H w a• w as as w a as a E 44 `Z 0 0 H H H H H H H z O > O o o O o o O o o o O D O >+ 4 ur .1 e-i r-1 r-i 1-4 1-4 � 'A In U H o 0 O o a o a O a o a o a O a o a 0 a 0 a H 030 A/P•- AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED 08:34AM 08/09/01 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK BK INVOICE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER ID.DATE AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME 44941 DEF 04/05/01 75.84 PEN010 JOHN PENA 44941 DEF 04/09/01 30.00 PEN010 JOHN PENA TOTAL VOIDED 105.84 INVOICE DESCRIPTION MILEAGE REIMB/LUNCH MEETING o4.t n3i A/P - AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED 08:33AM 08/09/01 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK BK INVOICE VENDOR VENDOR INVOICE NUMBER ID DATE AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 44496 DEF 03/05/01 25.00 &01339 SUSAN MC DONALD REFUND CLASS TOTAL VOIDED 25.00 042 0.3Z AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: C� ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Transmittal of Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Transmittal of Treasurer's Report dated June 30, 2001 for the City of La Quinta. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with California Government Code Section 53645 as amended 1 /1 /86; and is in conformity with City Code 3.08.010 to 3.08.070 Investment of Money and Funds. I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet next month's estimated expenditures. espeoully submit jed: n M. Falconer/, Finance Director Approved for Submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: Treasurer's Report, City of La Quinta 043 T a 0 4ht 4 ItA a" MEMORANDUM TO: La Quinta City Council FROM: John M. Falconer, Finance Director/Treasurer SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report for June 30, 2001 DATE: August 6, 2001 Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month ending June 30, 2001. The report is submitted to the City Council each month after a reconciliation of accounts is accomplished by the Finance Dept. The following table summarizes the changes in investment types for the month: Investment Beginning Purchased Notes Sold/Matured Other Ending Change Cash $766,550 $2,556,103 (1) $3,322,653 $2,556,103 LAIF $8,859,754 0 0 8,859,754 0 US Treasuries (2) $29,876,215 32,941 29,909,156 32,941 US Gov't Agencies (2) $15,122,362 5,000,000 (5,000,000) (12,322) 15,110,040 (12,322) Commercial Paper (2) $10,473,134 6,000,000 (10,500,000) 11,404 5,984,538 (4,488,596) Mutual Funds $10,552,621 0 1 294,268 10,258,353 294,268 Total $75 650 636 $13 556 103—-+ $15 794 268 $32 023 $73 444 494 $2 206 142 I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code; and is in conformity with the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the pools expenditure requirements for the next six months. the City of La Quinta used the Bureau of the Public Debt, U.S. Bank Monthly Statement and the Bank of New York Monthly Custodian Report to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. y1/1-/ V/ I & Director/Treasurer Footnote (1) The amount reported represents the net increase (decrease) of deposits and withdrawals from the previous month. (2) The amount reported in the other column represents the amortization of premium/discount for the month on US Treasury, Commercial Paper and Agency investments. 044 00 E 7 x Ca E 0 w 0 U a) 7 to N C CD E 0 () C o := a) c 0 c a) c 0 c 0 c a) c 0 c a) c Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z x W C o � iE LO O O NLO toil fl c c a0 O 0 U 0 0 P Ca a0o m a) > U cci c CM c m 0 mm 0 0 0 cu a) N Co Co m ca E 'c Co m 0 2 N w N 7 N N C7 ` V N po 0) O C " C O a) o O C� O C U O a Q N 0 C� U Co 0- N a ` CU 0 m m a� �L� E 0 o� ao O> a> Lr)0 O O 0 0 N N O O O o a) C N a) to C O c e� c O w, Oo = C N .0 a� rn 0 C 2 a) 0 o ° m o� �C�w � zo ax) Q a� c &� O Cn > O � It a0 O o O CD O v N co 0 to cM to O v N 0 N Z o N C) o 0 O O 0 0 to 0 0 LO O 0 0 COD 0 0 CD Q 0 O O n° (n 0 v N 0 y E 7 a E 0 o (D c LL Q >co O o Go p 0 O p o N C S 0 N 0 0) (V 0 O CO Z o c �_ o 0 0 0 0 0 o o -0 Q 7 O N t70 O O Q .M- rn E 'fl 7 7 E o 0 0 0 0 0 o Q LL x LO �Cl) Z = C6 000 COO COCl)CO Q U c r c U a) c 0 .= m to a) Z O E fn O Q U �Oo m U� (n C 0 o 0 ` 0) a) vOi f° cV 00<, �_ (D U) o y N > C O C Z � N .LL.. O- O 7 C to � CQ ` )" a c m C N N �) C 0 mO O m f0 0 U c O O w= m0. 7 N a) O a m " m LLmE00U) Cc7 g f4Na CL N E w c � Q) a) O UN7 +2 J u. 0 m p) O to c O 0LL w o Z 000CCMQz��w-m to E 'cu p) Y m Y c �3 N 'O r O 3 to cc cg Co c mV O c c �'m N m m O m C N w C m o (n � N L C C 'O fC CCa COa)�o20c��0 O a E ,� C6 0 0 OtnE m d E 0 E m c 0 m c`—°3z�mmUEa 0�0 oE�E�E c �E� (D n > p w E 0 — m E:C > cc fA O O 0 0 M 0@ m o E C c OZ2JLL c2 E >, C 0� - U U Q p C N to 0 E O �- j a) 0 N 0 0 0 0 E Q C6 0 C >, c E 0 t to UA xxi 2 (� �i ii ii ii LL ii E >, o X m CD > H U .. t"n d J W Q c o F- 0 0 0 0 a000 � OCof�M ItCl) �Cl) m m c c E E C C y C C CD ca o) E UQ N 0 0 C 0 UN O - C6 CL O O o m ��5 y 045 E E E www ._ CDN0H C c ca ccc.x " p'3 QQQc� R� A N C LL N a) O O E,8pg CQco C cc = N d w U LL o 0 Q 0 0 S cc 7 0 0 0 a Q m� Z Z Z Z N y � y N N y?zzz g g C , N O O Q �ZZ m M N Ypgprni�Nn Ci M ro O N N y o0 N 8 8 O LL N cm m m 10 Of ZZI I 9d a y C N oaEiaEia c -a y 0 a7 gg0 A O A F- C >. N Eym' �la� y c m Q � O 0 O a V� N N C N N mmaQQ0000 7 7 d'LL'ix IRw N 1U�y�d' > > oG 'y0 yoo Cqq oC000 O pmmmm cSI �mg_'m_d a a co �<ninin(n U U = 0 w co co N O$ Y 7 C7 O O O M N co N C, Q) ,$_ s I O Cl O W NNNGD >� nNLo�'iN �'-� NO cn O fA C 1 N a) y f0 y HO 0 0 0 0 O O O O OO C a7 2 2 ! a aaaa¢o u2zzzzzzzzz69 ¢ C Y Q �p co O a0 N 8 N E N N p M O M N N I n O M LO m N N N--7� co •-- Vi N O C7 Y d pp 8� 08� 8� 08�8 aoQ opQ opQ� oOQ f'�7 MC�MMM f")f")M C 6-0 C C C � C�pp � C�pp { CC � C�pp C C U U U U U U U U U - �EEEEEEEdE• W.Raa¢Q¢ad¢ 4 O y Vi V; V; y N U) y1 t� 7 > U a a»U:OaUaU� YI? Y C Y LL m 'gymmcc CYY CY mY m a7 mmmmm �¢vi°0°°m mvamin� (Ij D N U) o�g y c pQ 0 0 0 D< w p 0 2.2 U V H N Z O r o g CD r M y O Ln M � N p10 O 400 064 00 ti r O N a00 O cl0 It U N LO NCO co CNO� Cn Cn 0) �_ �tiCC)Ci ~ P,. 0`'OIt O 00 N cM0 O 04 M;cq M 0 H ti ci ON�CD H M 0( M ll� N O CO N M NN M O O Q CD co , UNOOMNj O m CO � � I wi C6 CD Ca a) M Q r, dN M ~ U CVMCON cq d co P- '0 LL C LL C N C 'd LL 3 '-' 3 LL C LL C C CDC LL U) U O C L 3 c Q pp C O U O C .O to 3 LL O iy y 3@ rnLL LL a w C+ OJ C c a) C w C li c� a) (D-0 a0iU c�06 � �� 3 y 3'0� O y Cn E >U- o � (� a� n._v �� Q �. (� LL XLL Uaw-LLa 0' V aQ m m � 2 �a i s $ O aZi2 w cLL i _ (� to � C) (n C y .Q N O .� 7 > ' -7o (n ,6 'Q U) N f09 y C w 3 C a 7 w � V00cy' �>wn SUQQw-iF� U0-N iidoN v SCR is)M4 ai " C00 DO) O 0, LO M � O N - - 60 CO O �CNp�NM co ��NC'O COO O LO CO � � LOLO co O CC) It lf) 609 O N � clq co 00 co O _CNp�tOnt�O�- Q�04 MNNCA(NpOw� �MCONC00 EARN—M— � 0 LO (Y) COM U to Ch CVCR 69 OO CO.) _ 'It N CO O 0O(DOO24 f� m ONO � R n coO0) LO D O' M d`d: ti M O 0) 0) O LL 69 O CC ) T qt CD E9 N N co O U) 0000 qt LO co 6 Lq � o CO 3 — CD 00 00 f� 0 f� CO co 00 co w- It C,O�MOpOO� �M69 mN1-M"TN00N U(NpLO00NON (D04LO - 0)NN 0 69 Cp M co 609, c N O COD O Cl) E u O N M O N CV'tInN'tr,: O 0 M W N N Z EA Cn ce) O ti 10 US M Cr) O a U) I N I� v 0 0) tc) co a) - N 649, Ln()v(D 69 QCJANO000MIt EaN00lCnq:OCD O O O M q* CO 00 M O wn � t 04 1'- - C j LO 69 CN M O OOOONNCOMO,O 3 O 4 co lfi Ln (N CC) L 4 r" Q N O M N 60 of N CO CO COCY)60 O0 O-N0)MO0O1-0) O 7 O 4 4 O 7N00)NM Cp O CA O CO CA I� ( — fn (V cn N O U Ca w z(1)wl C N •+ f0 E ma c E C O N N E 3 O y 0 V LL xs CDr0-� y (0 N ;a U) lA .` 3 O HUwn»a2�Z rl'S_] 005 0 Q m c 'U c N c LL a) c cu U U Q ac) cQ 0 E cU > a c c O �- =3Z: a)o CY CU � a>)N -i N a) O o Ems`') E UU)U Elf 0000 0000 OOOO C M Z Z Z 00000 Co iTL m O O O O N N N Ln r 'L Q Q Q 4 M r 0 7;B m z z z A O O,lt �2O)titico O MCl) MCM r r r r O O O p Cl) p Z Z Z- N N c0 OO O O O M _ O O Coco ' r O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 LO C 'LLr) l o 0 0 0 IL 0000 N N N N L f c L =3 N N O -a c� c� LL cLp c >-- N c0m U 0 0 0 0 C Q CL m � a a Q- >,'- CD I- U c U) o U U u) u1 — O ca s a) c O Z = moo— ~ U 0 u? a) LL a) CD c co U () aa) a a M a) a) a) L �_ N t� a Z M M m m COU D)OO-M CL-aC/) a a� N Co Fu , OZ+' U U U C Z z a > Z N N Q) U c y c E E E �-o L 06 QEEEoCOC� 4) c)U�UUU o Gu- c a) N� CZUJJQ- �;� L Q Q •L •L 'L a.d» O F- C N 'M p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (' J r Q Q Q M 4 N M 0 0 O O O ti O O O ZZZOp)p)p)p)r-p) O mcricrimC640 r r r r r r r O O O O O O O co O O O O O O O Q Q Q N N N N N N N 0 Z Z Z rn 00 co (00) rn CO 'c (0 C0 O 0 CO (O C0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O co co ( O C. •� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 ~ CL NrNrNNLd c c c � L Q- O o U O U U c p c c o u- c Q c 0 ._ c N E O N N CO u C 0C/)0oo2 O O 0 C:a_ M � C` C.06 a) a) m a) a) O E O F- _N c "-' VCn(A� cu)Co uW E O 70 4) c— (n co a) U 0cacmcucZLL H cE�u) a)0 O a ) LL 0 d co .a U o (D CM c a) L- (a Z c -o — �+ c c. 6- n CL CL 0- '0 ��(LQ-CLaaaivy mUU wow c 4-., m M M M M M� Z •L •L •L 'L •L •CU Vo V� ) Z ' . .. N � we Yi N �LEwE U EEEEEEc-o-- L fJl O E m-0000000>,M> cU�UUUUUU o- c (DE'W0 a)NNa)a)a)Uco- --EEEEEEuj�mw Z0-I-i aLa`.aLaLa��0 O N N LO O (DLO0)�j ti M LO rl EA e- � K3 N M EA C v U N c cu o C ca - I- a) CO U )U)0Em 0 'E 'a�C.�� c a) a) m CL L rn L W }, E c Co a a) D � c > > c � =� C N LU O �0�ooc 048 E o•c�cEoc a waa-jQ2 i 7 N 7 yy N 7 N N N Cf N M N N N f7 N N N N O a N N Lo N a �m `8 LL 3 � LL r LL LL �Z`oZSoo^ 000000060�o �Zo�0000 �Zo�o�oN44 oEL Zo�oo M (N u) fn fA Q O O Q O Q 0 0 0 0 0 Q O Q O NZ Cl) 8 (7 w n M NZ000 0000 0 3 &Z�000 3 N pN O)0r0 O�pcW1(� O)c��f 8O �pNp�ypN�� D NB�Of O�N� 3 V1 O��upy�Y�_V 7 NCr')��n j}MM 04 aD r N fn N W r N�VIOVNWO}O Of f"I�MNM V N O �jjO}O�OI �V NNE O 6 1- �y q�y� r��p Q Q Q Q O Q O fis N a) EL NO Npp Nqk ��C O n L Cl c) 7 yOO6 N N 0) fp �a1� _7 NLQ �tpVtpppJ1 07 f O> In 7 NCr' N}C') 7 rN ) t00� 0 W LO W MGM Nl� V N H�NN� y�py�0 pr'p 31 IR cc m E r c C Y € C E a aEi ai a > ¢ e To c r c Z J J a O LL Lj N 8 N v a N p m r 8 LL s � LL Q 8 Q ai of c Z�00000000o N O M O O Q f09 7 r �Z 61q 61� H 46 W K VO 60� W H to O � C Qp oo aD O m m N O V N 1 n O O M p M A O D }N 1A co fn LL�7 N .- f9 C6 Lo N O N O r a 88 m C NONpN<�OfiO f7001 GMO M M CMD N}clf Mt In �,QN NV N M ry O vs ri " vi N O N O r ��ppp� pppp M YQ $4y70c �N`OO W � IN M eMp1fpp� P NOO �V r u) m N W N M N O M ^L O M r �Cp C C C C C C C C U a c c �� 'C 'C aa� LL C C C C C C C c �dc a�c dda� >,=m E E E E E E E E E a)aaaaaaaaa Mo i N N C N U N N N N N N N N > U n U U 10 a N N a N a c N Q OYu- W C C W C Y f6 Y N (0 _ C ��m��°0mmmmm5 5¢�jmmcn mv>mv�� to f/jj Ntn�N� c ro 9 Ol .sv��ddaoaQoaoa C � � UV� � g 5 a v ar^o a � � n v r N O r g � U. C j U. g 049 N C, 0 DN C p L <LL r= N O. m LL U. 7 O : co pacl c.@ C d M 007 > C C C > C W cc NMO N 10 Of nN�ODCli (Np^ p aD (t) nOD CN OA Nn 1 � f` ej F M NN�NOOt Cl) c' O M Nej t0 tn0 NOOM^ rO::1Nh 4 f` 0 r. 0 LO U) 0 40 im tD OD co t^O Of f` M Of VNtO MfNDI_(OO� CO��O}D}TGM0OO1�1 0 MOD 0QNi MN tN a CNO mftRi OND `0 to t- r' Ntp MO LO p co MtDO tn0 N O O N cn O t„)N (qnR(O 0) U)coN 0 f: (Mn(ODCe)m SON 0) a? M 0 . a tL t0 N Lc) tD P OD 40 M w CO (M 0 to f`O� p to OD CO �� Ln t0 O t0 n t0 r O (N0O� cy; dNM M trD C-D OOP 1 O OODMOON N N N `OOf LL � NOCD(Dr- �� N r- M N N 0 N t0 t0 � U)0io 0)pOOf� to OD Cl) Cl) N- M 00ONr- M 00 Cf `NM C 0) Pt f`r t^�N ODm CD er OD0N0 cOf t0 Of t0 OMf Of `cl 0 O c C4 Cl) �D 0) a N M CO) +d+�N MOMpp LO cl) MOOD O�0 40 aco MO Nrl-L OM tn (eO{M OD NifJ 0! Iq Of 04 to d00 00 Oc N�NvN OO OODN 0 K O (pOA MHO Cl) In M CO) p 0 V nNn 0OD0 CID -On MHO}} 00) 04 (�pp 04 Of N r- CD 0 1- --d: M ONE cli N (n q in Mt0 (D p). O N (V p IL N NNT�e- MInT VZ ems- Cna !6 Of MM W M tMNN NoN tx N (O (O M O O co O r- . Oq 0 m p- la apcf CNN - O Of inLq(`M')MG O 0O) to ^w N�MN to rO 0tN toff ^ ... A 0 L M C d y) j 7 O L H C c t0 a a N tv N � is � C V N x .y+ C i y +�+ w �� m � d CO U> C C C C CO O m C 0 d J 0. X U t Z @ d N a C= W N m V U C yARU d y t cc« x to rn ��s aa° U 0' c m `° cm V c C N H Q. v d N LU to 17�f t nc d d 0 C 4) D, nm'ato as m c) m C U v « m a �(f°n�0 w(n0� z v w z ►0- O5O 008 CITY OF LA QUINTA BALANCE SHEET 06/30/01 ASSETS CITY CITY RDA RDA FA FIXED LONG TERM FIXED LONG TERM FINANCING LONG TERM GRAND CITY ASSETS DEBT RDA ASSETS DEBT AUTHORITY DEBT TOTAL POOLED CASH (6,744,888.59) 17,840,849.81 102,572.46 11,198,533.68 LQRP INVESTMENT IN POOLED CASH 805,000.00 805,000.00 INVESTMENT T-BILL/NOTES & OTHER 51,144,000.00 51,144,000.00 AUTO MALL CASH 160,981.67 160,981.67 LQRP CASH 16,890.01 16,890.01 BOND REDEMPTION CASH 2O2,106.57 1,545.71 203,652.28 BOND RESERVE CASH BOND PROJECT CASH 9,512,701.82 542,000.22 10,054,702.04 BOND ESCROW CASH PETTY CASH 1,000.00 1,000.00 CASH & INVESTMENT TOTAL 44,561,093.08 28,377,548.21 646,118.39 73,584,759.68 INVESTMENT IN LAND HELD FOR RESALE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 309,499.31 60,900.00 7,750,000.00 8,120,399.31 PREMIUM/DISCOUNT ON INVESTMENT (140,265.69) (140,265.69) LQRP-ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 88,299.11 88,299.11 INTEREST RECEIVABLE 477,057.38 477,057.38 LOAN/NOTES RECEIVABLE 2,861,382.64 2,861,382.64 DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES 1,092,869.90 260,386.80 1,353,256.70 DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES - CVAG 2,299,096.69 2,299,096.69 CVAG ALLOWANCE (2,299,096.69) (2,299,096.69) DUE FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTS 1,106,057.96 1,106,057.96 DUE FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,059,126.58 551,038.04 1,610,164.62 DUE FROM RDA 8,497,550.20 8,497,550.20 INTEREST ADVANCE -DUE FROM RDA 2,885,983.38 2,885,983.38 ADVANCES TO OTHER FUNDS 89,434.26 89,434.26 NSF CHECKS RECEIVABLE 3,861.01 3,861.01 ACCRUED REVENUE 833.40 833.40 TRAVEL ADVANCES 1,624.00 1,624.00 EMPLOYEE ADVANCES PREPAID EXPENSES 271,065.33 3,515.00 274,580.33 RECEIVABLE TOTAL 15,653,863.62 3,826,354.99 7,750,000.00 27,230,218.61 WORKER COMPENSATION DEPOSIT RENT DEPOSITS UTILITY DEPOSITS 75.00 75.00 MISC. DEPOSITS 2,100.00 2,100.00 DEPOSITS TOTAL 2,175.00 2,175.00 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS 1,460,862.67 15,750,077.00 9,988,279.05 27,199,218.72 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (812,743.27) (812,743.27) AMOUNT AVAILABLE TO RETIRE L/T DEBT 3,395,117.03 3,395,117.03 AMOUNT TO BE PROVIDED FOR L/T DEBT 836,449.65 91,416,222.85 7,750,000.00 100,002,672.50 TOTAL OTHER ASSETS 648,119.40 15,750,077.00 836,449.65 9,988,279.05 94,811,339.88 7,750,000.00 129,784,264.98 TOTAL ASSETS 60 865 251.10 15,750,077.00 836 449.65 32,203,903.20 9,988,279.05 94,811,339.88 8,396,118.39 7,750,000.00 230 60 4418.27 LIABILITIES: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 2,433,787.99 55,225.21 2,489,013.20 DUE TO OTHER AGENCIES 611,579.19 730,884.56 1,342,463.75 DUE TO OTHER FUNDS 547,608.02 1,318,207.97 1,865,815.99 INTEREST ADVANCE -DUE TO CITY ACCRUED EXPENSES 14,421.39 16,468.50 30,889.89 PAYROLL LIABILITIES 78,536.15 78,536.15 STRONG MOTION INSTRUMENTS 1.00 1.00 FRINGE TOED LIZARD FEES 78,981.50 78,981.50 SUSPENSE (40.00) (40.00) DUE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA 89,434.26 89,434.26 PAYABLESTOTAL 3,854,309.60 2,120,786.24 5,975,095.74 ENGINEERING TRUST DEPOSITS SO. COAST AIR QUALITY DEPOSITS ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES DEPOSITS 466,695.23 466,695.23 LQRP DEPOSITS 14,283.00 14,283.00 DEVELOPER DEPOSITS 942,442.09 942,442.09 MISC. DEPOSITS 439,539.50 439,539.50 AGENCY FUND DEPOSITS 2,114,365.34 2,114,365.34 TOTAL DEPOSITS 3,963,042.16 14,283.00 3,977,325.16 DEFERRED REVENUE 113,800.00 7,750,000.00 7,863,800.00 OTHER LIABILITIES TOTAL 113,800.00 7,750,000.00 7,863,800.00 COMPENSATED ABSENCES PAYABLE 258,138.65 258,138.65 DUE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA 578,311.00 11,383,537.38 11,961,848.38 DUE TO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 10,345,397.00 10,345,397.00 DUE TO C.V. UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. 8,747,405.50 8,747,405.50 DUE TO DESERT SANDS SCHOOL DIST. BONDS PAYABLE 64,335,000.00 7,750,000.00 72,085,000.00 TOTAL LONG TERM DEBT 836,449.65 94,811,339.88 7,750,000.00 103,397,789.53 TOTAL LIABILITIES 7,931,151.66 836,449.65 2,135,069.24 94,811,339.88 7,750,000.00 7,750,000.00 121,214,010.43 EQUITY -FUND BALANCE 52,934,099.44 15,750,077.00 30,068,833.96 9,988,279.05 646,118.39 109,387,407.84 TOTAL LIABILITY & EQUITY 60,865,251.10 15,750,077.00 836,449.65 32 203 903.20 9,988,279.05 94 811 339.88 8,396,118.39 7,750,000.00 230 601 418.27 CASH & INVESTMENT TOTAL 73,584,759.68 PREMIUM/DISCOUNT ON INVESTMENT (140 65,69) TOTAL 73,444,493.99 051 0O9 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Transmittal of Revenue and Expenditure Report dated PUBLIC HEARING: June 30, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Transmittal of the June 30, 2001 Statement of Revenue and Expenditures Report for the City of La Quinta. ResVegffully sub ohn M. Falcooer, Finance Director Approv d for submission b Thomas P. Genovese City Manager Attachments: 1. Revenue and Expenditures, June 30, 2001 052 CITY OF LA QUINTA REVENUES - ALL FUNDS 07/01/2000 - 6/30/2001 FUNDS BUDGET RECEIVED RECEIVED General Fund Revenues $12,787,298.00 $19,137,464.76 149.7% Library 162,634.00 181,757.13 111.8% Gas Tax Revenue 591,177.92 646,473.87 109.4% Cmaq/lstea 287,423.00 0.00 0.0% Federal Assistance 340,400.00 289,634.01 85.1 % Assessment District 2000-1 0.00 210,147.06 0.0% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 175,259.00 105,974.18 60.5% Local Law Enforcement 49,864.00 51,804.14 103.9% Lighting & Landscaping 778,000.00 787,854.95 101.3% Quimby 64,000.00 31,281.37 48.9% Infrastructure 358,989.00 210,806.51 58.7% Village Parking 1,500.00 1,008.85 67.3% South Coast Air Quality 22,044.00 28,600.82 129.7% Lq Public Safety Officer 2,200.00 2,632.46 119.7% Interest Allocation 0.00 (0.00) 0.0% Capital Improvement 45,323,338.02 15,199,423.41 33.5% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 3,474.30 0.0% Urban Forestry 11,000.00 0.00 0.0% Equipment Replacement 431,302.00 517,057.03 119.9% Arts In Public Places 222,700.00 196,942.11 88.4% Transportation 2,198,180.00 2,898,536.66 131.9% Parks & Recreation 221,500.00 464,561.42 209.7% Civic Center 303,900.00 698,933.95 230.0% Library Development 167,900.00 329,048.24 196.0% Community Center 58,600.00 123,490.29 210.7% Street Facility 10,500.00 30,529.14 290.8% Park Facility 3,200.00 6,960.94 217.5% La Quinta Financing Authority 688,130.00 756,598.68 109.9% RDA Project Area No. 1 24,550,109.63 26,714,371.61 108.8% RDA Project Area No. 2 9,199,530.00 10,302,003.74 112.0% Total $99,010,678.57 $79,927,371.63 80.7% 053 002 CITY OF LA Quinta Expenditures - ALL Funds 07/01/2000 - 6/30/2001 Funds BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED REMAINING BUDGET % EXPENDED General Fund $14,775,995.33 $12,496,800.57 $55,298.95 $2,223,895.81 84.6% Library 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Gas Tax 591,177.92 418,399.92 0.00 172,778.00 70.8% Cmaq/lstea 287,423.00 0.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.0% Federal Assistance 130,000.00 289,634.01 0.00 (159,634.01) 222.8% Proposed Assessment District 2,188,059.00 1,094,865.13 0.00 1,093,193.87 50.0% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 173,759.00 125,564.74 0.00 48,194.26 72.3% Local Law Enforcement 50,164.00 45,399.97 0.00 4,764.03 90.5% Lighting & Landscaping 778,000.00 777,999.96 0.00 0.04 100.0% Quimby 329,844.46 100,782.53 0.00 229,061.93 30.6% Infrastructure 5,344,792.25 1,819,672.18 0.00 3,525,120.07 34.0% Village Parking 29,236.00 31,128.85 0.00 (1,892.85) 106.5% South Coast Air Quality 5,700.00 10,699.19 0.00 (4,999.19) 187.7% Lq Public Safety Officer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Interest Allocation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Capital Improvement 45,323,339.60 15,199,423.42 0.00 30,123,916.18 33.5% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Urban Forestry 11,000.00 0.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.0% Equipment Replacement 496,413.00 308,764.12 0.00 187,648.88 62.2% Arts In Public Places 734,064.00 158,884.61 0.00 575,179.39 21.6% Transportation 1,560,322.00 180,902.97 0.00 1,379,419.03 11.6% Parks & Recreation 2,020,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,020,000.00 0.0% Civic Center 203,700.00 211,983.00 0.00 (8,283.00) 104.1 % Library Development 525,000.00 1,675.56 0.00 523,324.44 0.3% Community Center 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Street Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Park Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% La Quinta Financing Authority 1,205,861.78 688,087.50 0.00 517,774.28 57.1% RDA Project Area No.. 1 36,090,521.77 27,735,224.62 0.00 8,355,297.15 76.8% RDA Project Area No.. 2 17,517,869.75 10,242,983.79 0.00 7,274,885.96 58.5% Total $130,372,242.86 $71 938 876.64 $55,298.95 $58,378,067.27 55.2% 054 100 CITY OF LA QUINTA GENERAL FUND REVENUES DETAIL TAXES: Property Tax No Low Property Tax Distribution Document Transfer Tax Sales Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Franchise Tax TOTAL TAXES LICENSE & Permits: Business License Animal License Building Permits Plumbing Permits Electrical Permits Mechanical Permits Misc. Permits TOTAL LICENSES & Permits FEES: Sale of Maps & Publications Community Services Fees Bldg & Safety Fees Community Development Fees Public Works Fees TOTAL FEES Intergovernmental Motor Vehicle In -Lieu Motor Vehicle Code Fines Parking Violations Misc. Fines AB939 State of California Grant CSA152 Assessment TOTAL Intergovernmental INTEREST miscellaneous Miscellaneous Revenue Cash Over/(Short) TOTAL miscellaneous TRANSFER IN TOTAL GENERAL FUND 07/01 /2000 - 6/30/2001 REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 520,600.00 471,346.16 49,253.84 90.5% 441,800.00 691,187.73 (249,387.73) 156.4% 275,040.00 515,310.07 (240,270.07) 187.4% 2,683,750.00 3,749,033.19 (1,065,283.19) 139.7% 3,289,100.00 4,249,753.11 (960,653.11) 129.2% 349,500.00 625,789.54 (276,289.54) 179.1 % 7,559,790.00 10,302,419.80 (2,742,629.80) 136.3% 130,900.00 156,026.05 (25,126.05) 119.2% 8,400.00 14,076.50 (5,676.50) 167.6% 412,500.00 1,302,672.42 (890,172.42) 315.8% 89,400.00 202,727.74 (113,327.74) 226.8% 68,000.00 213,679.83 (145,679.83) 314.2% 35,800.00 118,786.04 (82,986.04) 331.8% 57,900.00 49,454.19 8,445.81 85.4% 802,900.00 2,057,422.77 (1,254,522.77) 256.2% 4,400.00 951.30 3,448.70 21.6% 143,675.00 123,959.77 19,715.23 86.3% 305,528.00 911,687.35 (606,159.35) 298.4% 161,100.00 320,911.97 (159,811.97) 199.2% 270,000.00 641,078.27 (371,078.27) 237.4% 884,703.00 1,998,588.66 (1,113,885.66) 225.9% 1,078,800.00 1,431,151.19 (352,351.19) 132.7% 56,250.00 65,469.07 (9,219.07) 116.4% 22,300.00 42,367.96 (20,067.96) 190.0% 3,600.00 18,426.64 (14,826.64) 511.9% 86,600.00 298,489.53 (211,889.53) 344.7% 115,355.00 155,646.80 (40,291.80) 134.9% 113,800.00 3,340.00 110,460.00 2.9% 1,476,705.00 2,014,891.19 (538,186.19) 136.4% 1,519,000.00 2,482,031.52 (963,031.52) 163.4% 68,900.00 43,524.58 25,375.42 63.2% 0.00 21.94 (21.94) 0.0% 68,900.00 43,546.52 25,353.48 63.2% 475,300.00 238,564.30 236,735.70 50.2% 12,787,298.00 19,137,464.76 (6,350,166.76) 149.7% 056 004 CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL LIBRARY: County of Riverside Interest TOTAL LIBRARY GAS TAX REVENUE: Section 2105 Section 2106 Section 2107 Section 2107.5 Traffic Congestion Relief Interest TOTAL GAS TAX CMAQ/ISTEA CMAQ/ISTEA Grant Interest TOTAL CMAQ/ISTEA FEDERAL ASSISTANCE REVENUE: CDBG Grant Interest TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE Assessment DISTRICT 2000-1 REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 150,000.00 150,000.00 0.00 100.0% 12,634.00 31,757.13 (19,123.13) 251.4% 162,634.00 181,757.13 (19,123.13) 111.8% 135,600.00 148,521.02 (12,921.02) 109.5% 98,200.00 106,838.74 (8,638.74) 108.8% 175,100.00 196,193.84 (21,093.84) 112.0% 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 100.0% 172,777.92 172,777.92 0.00 100.0% 4,500.00 17,142.35 (12,642.35) 380.9% 591,177.92 646,473.87 (55,295.95) 109.4% 287,423.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 287,423.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.0% 340,400.00 289,634.01 50,765.99 85.1 % 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 340,400.00 289,634.01 50,765.99 85.1 % Interest 0.00 135,651.32 (135,651.32) 0.0% Assessment Bond Proceeds 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Prepayments -sewer assessments 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Transfer in 0.00 74,495.74 (74,495.74) 0.0% TOTAL PROPOSED Assessment DISTRICT 0.00 210,147.06 (210,147.06) 0.0% SLESF(COPS)REVENUE: SLESF (Cops) Funding Interest TOTAL SLESF (COPS) LOCAL LAW Enforcement BLOCK GRANT REVENUE: LLEBG Funding Interest Transfer in TOTAL LLEBG LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING REVENUE: 173,759.00 100,027.94 73,731.06 57.6% 1,500.00 5,946.24 (4,446.24) 396.4% 175,259.00 105,974.18 69,284.82 60.5% 49,564.00 49,772.00 (208.00) 100.4% 300.00 2,032.14 (1,732.14) 677.4% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 49,864.00 51,804.14 (1,940.14) 103.9% Assessment 773,700.00 782,610.26 (8,910.26) 101.2% Developer 0.00 3,750.00 (3,750.00) 0.0% Interest 4,300.00 1,494.69 2,805.31 34.8% TOTAL LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING 778,000.00 787,854.95 (9,854.95) 101.3% CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) QUIMBY REVENUE: Quimby Fees Interest TOTAL QUIMBY INFRASTRUCTURE REVENUE: Infrastructure Fee Interest TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE VILLAGE PARKING REVENUE: Interest TOTAL VILLAGE PARKING SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY REVENUE: S.C.A.Q. Contribution Interest TOTAL SCAQ LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER FUND Transfer In Interest TOTAL LQ PUBLIC SAFETY INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND: Pooled Cash Allocated Interest Transfer In TOTAL INTEREST ALLOCATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: CVAG Funding CVWD County of Riverside State of Ca- Office Emer. Services RCTC Funding IID DSUSD State of California SB300 Funding Surface Transportation S13821-Bicycle Path Grant APP Contribution Developer Agreement Funding Transfers in Frog Other Funds TOTAL CIP REVENUE REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 55,000.00 0.00 55,000.00 0.0% 9,000.00 31,281.37 (22,281.37) 347.6% 64,000.00 31,281.37 32,718.63 48.9% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 358,989.00 210,806.51 148,182.49 58.7% 358,989.00 210,806.51 148,182.49 58.7% 1,500.00 1,008.85 491.15 67.3% 1,500.00 1,008.85 491.15 67.3% 21,244.00 25,944.57 (4,700.57) 122.1 % 800.00 2,656.25 (1,856.25) 332.0% 22,044.00 28,600.82 (6,556.82) 129.7% 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 100.0% 200.00 632.46 (432.46) 316.2% 2,200.00 2,632.46 (432.46) 119.7% 0.00 (0.00) 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 (0.00) 0.00 0.0% 14,901,057.28 5,567,832.10 9,333,225.18 37.4% 1,922,975.00 724,095.29 1,198,879.71 37.7% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 12,168.00 12,168.00 0.00 100.0% 7,044.00 6,500.00 544.00 92.3% 530,600.00 0.00 530,600.00 0.0% 953,244.74 933,390.00 19,854.74 97.9% 67,000.00 0.00 67,000.00 0.0% 25,905.00 0.00 25,905.00 0.0% 531,364.00 157,820.61 373,543.39 29.7% 515,784.00 276,149.31 239,634.69 53.5% 25,856,196.00 7,521,468.10 18,334,727.90 29.1 % 45,323,338.02 15,199,423.41 30,123,914.61 33.5% CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) LQ NORTE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: Prepayment Bond Proceeds Interest TOTAL LQ NORTE CIP URBAN FORESTRY Grant Revenue Interest TOTAL URBAN FORESTRY Equipment Replacement FUND: Equipment Charges Capital Contribution Interest Transfers In TOTAL Equipment Replacement REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 3,474.30 (3,474.30) 0.0% 0.00 3,474.30 (3,474.30) 0.0% 11,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.00 0.0% 0.0% 11,000.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.0% 372,202.00 374,748.00 0.00 22,882.00 59,100.00 119,427.03 0.00 0.00 (2,546.00) 100.7% (22,882.00) 0.0% (60,327.03) 202.1 % 0.00 0.0% 431,302.00 517,057.03 (85,755.03) 119.9% ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES REVENUE: * Arts in Public Places Deposits 196,900.00 160,154.76 36,745.24 81.3% * Arts in Public Places Credits Applied 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Interest 25,800.00 36,787.35 (10,987.35) 142.6% TOTAL ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES 222,700.00 196,942.11 25,757.89 88.4% * These amounts are deposits and are treated as liabilities and not as revenues. TRANSPORTATION Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL TRANSPORTATION PARKS & RECREATION Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION CIVIC CENTER 284,000.00 823,412.15 (539,412.15) 289.9% 23,100.00 184,044.51 (160,944.51) 796.7% 1,891,080.00 1,891,080.00 0.00 100.0% 2,198,180.00 2,898,536.66 (700,356.66) 131.9% 201,000.00 413,975.91 (212,975.91) 206.0% 20,500.00 50,585.51 (30,085.51) 246.8% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 221,500.00 464,561.42 (243,061.42) 209.7% Developer fees 284,500.00 637,564.60 (353,064.60) 224.1 % Interest 19,400.00 61,369.35 (41,969.35) 316.3% TOTAL CIVIC CENTER 303,900.00 698,933.95 (395,033.95) 230.0% 059 067 CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY CENTER Developer fees Interest TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER STREET FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL STREET FACILITY PARK FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL PARK FACILITY REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 150,000.00 242,803.38 (92,803.38) 161.9% 17,900.00 86,244.86 (68,344.86) 481.8% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 167,900.00 329,048.24 (161,148.24) 196.0% 53,500.00 110,032.86 (56,532.86) 205.7% 5,100.00 13,457.43 (8,357.43) 263.9% 58,600.00 123,490.29 (64,890.29) 210.7% 9,500.00 27,695.87 (18,195.87) 291.5% 1,000.00 2,833.27 (1,833.27) 283.3% 10,500.00 30,529.14 (20,029.14) 290.8% 3,000.00 6,167.80 (3,167.80) 205.6% 200.00 793.14 (593.14) 396.6% 3,200.00 6,960.94 (3,760.94) 217.5% 18 07/01/2000 - 6/30/2001 General Fund Expenditure SUMMARY REMAINING % BY DEPARTMENT BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED GENERAL GOVERNMENT: LEGISLATIVE 585,850.00 690,117.78 0.00 (104,267.78) 117.8% CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 608,625.00 545,820.61 62,804.39 89.7% ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 886,350.00 890,901.49 0.00 (4,551.49) 100.5% PERSONNEL/RISK MGT 454,562.00 356,162.44 25.00 98,374.56 78.4% TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 2,535,387.00 2,483,002.32 25.00 52,359.68 97.9% FINANCE : FISCAL SERVICES 507,460.00 451,048.24 30,200.00 26,211.76 88.9% CENTRAL SERVICES 475,465.00 407,637.91 23,667.00 44,160.09 85.7% TOTAL FINANCE 982,925.00 858,686.15 53,867.00 70,371.85 87.4% CITY CLERK 369,295.00 341,635.81 27,659.19 92.5% COMMUNITY SERVICES SENIOR CENTER 249,190.00 219,143.49 0.00 30,046.51 87.9% PARKS & RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 667,750.00 543,631.77 0.00 124,118.23 81.4% PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAMS 90,100.00 63,480.91 0.00 26,619.09 70.5% TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 1,007,040.00 826,256.17 0.00 180,783.83 82.0% POLICE 3,774,313.00 3,650,631.58 1,406.95 122,274.47 96.7% BUILDING & SAFETY: BUILDING & SAFETY - ADMIN 185,782.00 192,780.75 0.00 (6,998.75) 103.8% CODE COMPLIANCE 519,825.00 425,452.01 0.00 94,372.99 81.8% ANIMAL CONTROL 198,155.00 139,803.17 0.00 58,351.83 70.6% BUILDING 815,371.00 755,927.49 0.00 59,443.51 92.7% EMERGENCY SERVICES 23,141.00 20,671.46 0.00 2,469.54 89.3% FIRE 27,278.00 5,405.88 0.00 21,872.12 19.8% CIVIC CENTER BUILDING -OPERATIONS 1,108,540.00 1,139,562.03 0.00 (31,022.03) 102.8% TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY 2,878,092.00 2,679,602.79 0.00 198,489.21 93.1% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - ADMIN 475,465.00 373,649.30 0.00 101,815.70 78.6% CURRENT PLANNING 905,200.00 559,225.96 0.00 345,974.04 61.8% TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,380,665.00 932,875.26 0.00 447,789.74 67.6% PUBLIC WORKS: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 215,080.00 220,283.42 0.00 (5,203.42) 102.4% DEVELOPMENT & TRAFFIC 825,251.33 758,827.62 0.00 66,423.71 92.0% MAINT/OPERATIONS - STREETS 1,188,513.00 514,744.70 0.00 673,768.30 43.3% MAINT/OPERATIONS - LTG/LANDSCAPING 1,454,552.00 1,321,271.63 0.00 133,280.37 90.8% CAPITAL PROJECTS 485,663.00 152,073.10 0.00 333,589.90 31.3% TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 4,169,059.33 2,967,200.47 0.00 1,201,858.86 71.2% TRANSFERS OUT 1,555,785.00 828,437.59 0.00 727,347.41 53.2% GENERAL FUND REIMBURSEMENTS (3,876,566.00) (3,071,527.57) 0.00 (805,038.43) 79.2% NET GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 14 775 995.33 12,496 800.57 55,298.95 2,223,895.81 84.6% U09 CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2000 - 6/30/2001 OTHER CITY Funds REMAINING % Expenditure SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED LIBRARY Fund: PROJECT EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% GAS TAX REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 418,400.00 418,399.92 0.00 0.08 100.0% TRANSFER OUT 172,777.92 0.00 0.00 172,777.92 0.0% REIMBURSE GEI TOTAL GAS TAX 591.177.92 418.399.92 0.00 172.778.00 70.8% QUIMBY Fund: TRANSFER OUT 329 844.46 100 782.53 0.00 229 061.93 30.6% FEDERAL Assistance Fund: TRANSFER OUT 130,000.00 289,634.01 0.00 (159,634.01) 222.8% SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY Fund PROJECT EXPENDITURES 5,700.00 10,699.19 0.00 (4,999.19) 187.7% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 5,700.00 10,699.19 0.00 (4,999.19) 187.7% CMAQ/ISTEA TRANSFER OUT 287,423.00 0.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.0% VILLAGE Parking TRANSFER OUT 29,236.00 31,128.85 0.00 (1,892.85) 106.5% LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRIBUTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% LLEBG Fund TRANSFER OUT 50,164.00 45,399.97 0.00 4,764.03 90.5% SLEF (COPS) TRANSFER OUT 173,759.00 125,564.74 0.00 48,194.26 72.3% Lighting & LANDSCAPING Assessment DIST: REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 778,000.00 777,999.96 0.00 0.04 100.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL LTG/LANDSCAPING FUND 778,000.00 777,999.96 0.00 0.04 100.0% infrastructure: CONSTRUCTION 46,700.00 42,030.00 0.00 4,670.00 90.0% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 5,298,092.25 1,777,642.18 0.00 3,520,450.07 33.6% TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE 5,344,792.25 1,819,672.18 0.00 3,525,120.07 34.0% Assessment DISTRICT 2000-1 COSTS OF ISSUANCE 0.00 25,889.39 0.00 (25,889.39) 0.0% TRANSFER TO AGENCY FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 2,188,059.00 1,068,975.74 0.00 1,119,083.26 48.9% TOTAL AD 2000-1 2,188,059.00 1,094,865.13 0.00 1,093,193.87 50.0% osz vio CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2000 - 6/30/2001 General Fund Expenditure SUMMARY REMAINING % BY Department BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM COSTS 54,000.00 0.00 0.00 54,000.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 1,506,322.00 180,902.97 0.00 1,325,419.03 12.0% TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 1,560,322.00 180,902.97 0.00 1,379,419.03 11.6% PARKS & Recreation PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 2,020,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,020,000.00 0.0% TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 2,020,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,020,000.00 0.0% CIVIC Center PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 8,283.00 0.00 (8,283.00) 0.0% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 203,700.00 203,700.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL CIVIC CENTER 203 700.00 211 983.00 0.00 (8,283.00) 104.1% LIBRARY Development PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 525,000.00 1,675.56 0.00 523,324.44 0.3% TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 525 000.00 1,675.56 0.00 523,324.44 0.3% Community Center PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% STREET FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL STREET FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% PARK FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL PARK FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% CAPITAL Improvement Fund PROJECT EXPENDITURES 44,234,660.06 14,927,199.58 0.00 29,307,460.48 33.7% PROJECT REIMBURSEMENTS TO GEN FUND 1,088,679.54 272,223.84 0.00 816,455.70 25.0% TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 45 323 339.60 15 199 423.42 0.00 30,123,916.18 33.5% ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Fund PROJECT EXPENSES 202,700.00 1,064.00 0.00 201,636.00 0.5% CIP EXPENSES 531,364.00 157,820.61 0.00 373,543.39 29.7% TOTAL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES 734,064.00 158,884.61 0.00 575,179.39 21.6% LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP Fund PROJECT EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Urban FORESTRY Grant TRANSFER OUT 11,000.00 0.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.0% Equipment Replacement Fund OPERATING EXPENSES 496 413.00 308 764.12 187,648.88 62.2% U 1 T 6 0 4t!t 4 4 Qum& COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Improvements Associated with Tract 27835, Rancho La Quinta AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Accept improvements to Tract 27835 and authorize staff to release security upon receiving warranty security. None. None. This T.D. Desert Development subdivision is located within Rancho La Quinta Country Club, south of Avenue 48, east of Washington Street, and west of Jefferson Street (Attachment 1). All improvements are now complete and other obligations of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement have been satisfied. Included as Attachment 2 is a spreadsheet indicating security to be released after the City receives the warranty security. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Accept improvements to Tract 27835 and authorize staff to release security upon receiving warranty security; or 2. Provide staff with alternative direction. TAMDEMCOUNCIL\2001 \010821 e.wpd Respectfully submitted, .G� f. Chris A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Security Outline Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 065 TAMDEMCOUNCIL\2001 \01 0821 e.wpd 002 EISENHOWER DRIVE cn En a 0 co x J Q CL w w> VICINITY MAP NTS ATTACHMENT 1 �s'.. GUI ATTACHMENT 2 TRACT 27835 Performance Payment Warranty Improvement Security Secures Securit Phase 2 Design Engineering $1-71600 $8,800 $1,760 Streets & Grading $435,000 $217,500 $43,500 Golf Parking Lot $167,600 $83,800 $16,760 Domestic Water $ 296,400 $148, 200 $ 29, 640 Sanitary Sewer $97,000 $48,500 $9,700 Storm Drainage $239,200 $1 19,600 $23,920 Underground Electrical $160,000 $80,000 $16,000 Interior Landscaping $30,000 $15,000 $3,000 Erosion Control Perimeter Landscaping $126,000 $63,000 $12,600 and Wall Monumentation $2,250 $0- $0 $1,571,050 $784,400 $156,880 Release performance security when warranty security is received. Release payment security in 90 days (November 21, 2001). Release warranty security in one year (August 21, 2002) . 067 TAMDEMCOUNCIL\2001 \010821 e.wpd �� t COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Improvements Associated with Tract 27952 (Final), Rancho La Quinta AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: 5 Accept improvements to Tract 27952 (Final) and authorize staff to release security upon receiving warranty security. None. None. This T.D. Desert Development subdivision is located within Rancho La Quinta Country Club, south of Avenue 48, east of Washington Street, and west of Jefferson Street (Attachment 1). All improvements are now complete and other obligations of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement have been satisfied. Included as Attachment 2 is a spreadsheet indicating security to be released after the City receives the warranty security. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Accept improvements to Tract 27952 (Final) and authorize staff to release security upon receiving warranty security; or 2. Provide staff with alternative direction. TAMDEMCOUNCIL\2001 \010821 f.wpd Respectfully submitted, Chris A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Vicinity Map 2. Security Outline 002 TAPWDEPT\C0UNCIL\2001 \010821 f.wpd ATTACHMENT 1 � --�- PALM DESERT �- � INDIO o HWY 111 � z ROJECT con Q SITE 4Z ' AVENUE 0V VICINITY MAP N.T.S. 1 1� 0 U-Q ATTACHMENT 2 TRACT 27952 (Final) Performance Payment Warranty Improvement Security Security Security Subdivision Improvements $426,000 $426,000 $42,600 Monumentation $7,000 $0 $0 $433,000 $426,000 $42,600 Release performance security when warranty security is received. Release payment security in 90 days (November 21, 2001). Release warranty security in one year (August 21, 2002). 071 TAMDEMCOUNCIL\2001 \010821 f.wpd 0(.)5 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Improvements Associated with Tract 27952-1, Rancho La Quinta AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Accept improvements to Tract 27952-1 and authorize staff to release security upon receiving warranty security. None. None. This T.D. Desert Development subdivision is located within Rancho La Quinta Country Club, south of Avenue 48, east of Washington Street, and west of Jefferson Street (Attachment 1). All improvements are now complete and other obligations of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement have been satisfied. Included as Attachment 2 is a spreadsheet indicating security to be released after the City receives the warranty security. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Accept improvements to Tract 27952-1 and authorize staff to release security upon receiving warranty security; or 2. Provide staff with alternative direction. 072 T:\PWDEPT\C0UNCIL\2001 \010821 g.wpd Respectfully submitted, Chris A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission b Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Vicinity Map 2. Security Outline 073 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2001\010821g.wpd 002 �- PALM DESERT HWIY 111 Q PROJECT � SITE v- AVENUE 48 z Z 0 Z RANCHp n = LA QUWA w \ W 3 \ r�7 � AVENUE 150 Q' VICINITY MAP N.T.S. ATTACHMENT 1 INDIO 074 -,Ou4 ATTACHMENT 2 TRACT 27952-1 Performance Payment Warranty Improvement Security Securit Securir Grading $30,000 $15,000 $3,000 Street Improvements $87,000 $43,500 $8,700 Domestic Water $39,000 $19,500 $3,900 Sanitary Sewer $19,000 $9,500 $1,900 Underground Electrical $24,000 $12,000 $2,400 Monumentation $4,000 $0 $0 $ 203,000 $ 99, 500 $19, 900 Release performance security when warranty security is received. Release Payment security in 90 days (November 21, 2001). Release warranty security in one year (August 21, 2002) . 075 TAMDEMCOUNCI02001\010821g.wpd Cj f t COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Improvements Associated with Tract 28640, Rancho La Quinta AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Accept improvements to Tract 28640 and authorize staff to release security upon receiving warranty security. None. None. This T.D. Desert Development subdivision is located within Rancho La Quinta Country Club, south of Avenue 48, east of Washington Street, and west of Jefferson Street (Attachment 1). All improvements are now complete and other obligations of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement have been satisfied. Included as Attachment 2 is a spreadsheet indicating security to be released after the City receives the warranty security. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Accept improvements to Tract 28640 and authorize staff to release security upon receiving warranty security; or 2. Provide staff with alternative direction. TAPWDEPT\C0UNCIL\2001 \010821 d.wpd Respectfully submitted, Chris A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Security Outline 077 TAMDEMCOUNCIL\2001 \010821 d.wpd 002 EI SEN PON DRJVE ATTACHMENT 1 Ln 2 VICINITY MAP NIT S 078 004 ATTACHMENT 2 TRACT 28640 Performance Labor & Materials Warranty Improvement Security Security Security Grading $176,550 $176,550 $17,655 On -site Streets $193,500 $193,500 $19,350 Domestic Water $103,055 $103,055 $10,305 Sanitary Sewer $52,155 $52,155 $5,215 Underground Electrical $160,000 $160,000 $16,000 Monumentation $10,200 $0 $0 $695,460 $685,260 $68,526 Release performance security when warranty security is received. Release labor & materials security in 90 days (November 21, 2001). Release warranty security in one year (August 21, 2002). 079 TAMDEMCOUNCIU2001 \010821 d.wpd T 0 0 4hf 4 4 Qum& COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution Granting Conditional Approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 24197-3, Monticello, Century Homes AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 9 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 24197-3, Monticello, Century Homes. None. None. Tract 24197-3 is located west of Jefferson Street, north of Miles Avenue and south Fred Waring Drive (Attachment 1), and consists of 52 residential lots (Attachment 2). The developer has requested the City Council's conditional approval of the Final Map which will allow 30 days for completion of its processing. As of August 9, 2001, City staff has not received approval of the Final Map from the City's Acting Surveyor; however, it is expected that a technically correct map will be submitted within the time allowed with its conditional approval. A Subdivision Improvement Agreement has been executed by the developer; however, the associated securities have not been received. As a result, City staff has prepared the attached Resolution which provides for conditional approval of the Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement. The approval is contingent upon receipt, within 30 days (September 21, 2001), of a technically correct Final Map suitable for recording by the County Recorder with all required signatures except for the City Clerk. 1:1 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2001\010821 a.wpd Once these items are received, the City Clerk will affix the City Seal to the Final Map and offer the final map for recording by the County Recorder. If any of the required items are not received by City staff within the specified time frame, the Final Map will be considered disapproved and will be rescheduled for City Council consideration only after all required items have been received. The developer has demonstrated to City staff that sufficient progress has been made with the documents required for conditional final map approval. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 24197-3, Monticello, Century Homes; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 24197-3, Monticello, Century Homes; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Chris A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Tract Map 3. Subdivision Improvement Agreement TAMDEFRCOUNCIU2001 \010821 a.wpd OU2 RESOLUTION NO. 2000- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF LA QUINTA GRANTING CONDITIONAL FINAL MAP APPROVAL OF TRACT 24197-3, AND AUTHORIZING A TIME EXTENSION FOR SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO VALIDATE THE APPROVAL WHEREAS, the City Council conducts only two regular meetings per month and the time interval between these meetings occasionally creates an undue hardship for business enterprises and individuals seeking approval of subdivision maps, and WHEREAS, the City Council as a matter of policy allows a subdivider to have city staff present the map for approval consideration when the requisite items necessary for final map approval are nearly, but not completely, finished thus yielding to the subdivider additional production time for preparation of those items, and WHEREAS, the subdivider has demonstrated to city staff and the City Council that it has made sufficient progress with items required for final map approval, and it is reasonable to expect the subdivider to satisfactorily complete the items, including city staff review time, within thirty (30) days without adversely impacting other ongoing work commitments of city staff, and WHEREAS, Section 66458(b) of the Subdivision Map Act grants the City Council broad authority to authorize time extensions regarding final map approval, or disapproval, upon receiving it for consideration, and WHEREAS, the City Council relies on professional city staff to review all required items for conformance with relevant requirements, and it is therefore appropriate for the City Council to approve the final map subject to review and confirmation of the required items by professional city staff, within a reasonable period of time as specified by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of La Quinta does hereby find, determine, order and resolve as follows: Section 1. The final map for Tract 24197-3 is conditionally approved provided the subdivider submits all required items on or before September 21, 2001. Section 2. The City Council's approval of the final map shall not be considered valid until the City Engineer has signed the map indicating that it conforms with the tentative map, the Subdivision Map Act and all ordinances of the City. Section 3. The City Engineer shall withhold his signature from the map until the subdivider has completed the following requirements to the City Engineer's satisfaction. 082 OU3 A. Produced a technically correct drawing of the map area that is suitable for recording by the County Recorder B. Has obtained all requisite signatures on the map title page, except for the City Clerk's signature. Section 4. The City Clerk shall withhold affixing the City Seal to the map title page, along with her attesting signature, until the City Engineer has signed the map. Section 5. The time extension for satisfying the requirements of the conditional approval for this final map shall expire when City offices close for regular business on September 21, 2001. If the subdivider has not satisfied the requirements in Section 3, herein, by the expiration deadline, the final map shall be considered disapproved. Disapproval does not deny any rights the subdivider may have under the Map Act to resubmit the final map for approval, or disapproval. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 211 day of August, 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 004 ATTACHMENT 1 n COUNTRY CLUB DR. HOVLEY LN. E. z 0 c� z cn 3 PALM DESERT 42ND AVE. PROJECT SITE •INDIO s H WY ill VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE 006 ATTACHMENT 2 1 Z O �N U tL O r Ld0W Z IL }a I-z D O U a r Z O J 4 2 F U IW z 0 F01 O y� N rWW gg Whig< < Y r u CJ yx OK 3 •; 44yp 1119ztI �I1T�i'•8Fab OFr xeyWi �Q}m'J=�W "` %�'•F > a�� %M 3< 00 6 sOOOKF 2.q i1N W1- ffig yq C� WO F O v M j �y U Ada > o m 8 aI W,..p� U`�O m75a < WE W y� Q' zz1 W ► M Q2a < iS y°58 � 1�1 J pI W a V �oaF nI U 7<uwwVlnl ili754FIZNm� Wdl ry U��W Qd R N FON <F n �' <� 7i< g F U z�Q Q 7 gill 4 3O < u�i N] 0 U. o boy rlL F>< oYrO�� w in WC UQ 02. ZZZow: OOO�a01 V <[i U >oppSJ oc � 0�U�J� Alaiy ing iW x< o o r oo =aW toU _z yo I _a EVER Oz> J N lL W Q O Al x a1 rN a oh W z Z I V w ai ~ F- V) CO 0LLZ O a.N W W r W 0:1Ora U) -c 3. avn E" N Z UzOCIc DIN a I o Q U "` �+ WZ _ N QZr �a mWo x SIN w N~lii Q� a �a 0 a A V I N V } X F � N 71 g IN �Gi W m 0 �°�I RWa �� $�� nF In rIN Z W va W W� N =� N F� W� Z 0~ Z5 g! z NO W mF � y�N U I� X0 O N r zg� b _~�_ i4 Z . pz Fig z w o i ILJ 'AA' aE z �3i�i z z hz o N ` t 7�{ W!� F� < !i a Z c� W a '�� 0Li ��W FNC m o Y� m r < o`FFff� zN ` rc i s� 033 I $ I�� gym Z.o W ^^ g � N ) -V O < 3, od,f �7 .4 �' O < io0 a z �}yj� ��Oo1O b i k' �h Q >= %F a a »�F > �� N ppYqq H W! We Z ? Q �� >��Ir b ' i p iz wx RX` I < 0 3 k' .,z <W 0-1 n U- 0 W M _i_ m m z �t�� as a I oN ~a �I��WNy� F Iva, I'Gel pi �YI �`OiI F W fl O al m � WEa�s�r : ra �aa( 'NOS w O 8 W /Y PIP aAsk- L° 18 00 W IrN�WW W 9.1 y i 1 YY<1I;x66W G y nil f�11=`W� W r` 1,4� 7 n 1FW z < w5p ula pro 0 W g Z <v H =sUF w N Fla b Y Sig 8 yy� 1y C yW` 1r Wes[ S s R �<„�O T101OR Ou7. In w w W I V) � a 8 W <ZW LL 0 �WF4m N N i �3�04r Z q Z U) H w Z N� mOmb FE SP U Z Z mN- F 0 I Z V) o o w O w iWwvi<nZ m m�<l.in m Z to < < = o N O W w F u�i�wc d"O UI muZi4wZ *� Cgdi9 F<- W Z WYdnn2SU m <Zt3mK w H of O O I00: 1-,-- 0] U rc 0Na zt & 00�,U) F to no: I -rw 0 u Q�^ w t,00 Q QOLZ. O \ I � V U) G IL o 5 o 0O FFO :1 to d � y w o c 0 a WQ u Q A� Z En Da r W S m Z U O ~ 0 V ��N qtG <R ►d^lZZ� u �70I -H8s-3 F NO� �}OR 0 o FH = z 9i IN �gq `PIF O 8Z0N1„K pill Z�Y s s N� g� AR uq-9 a o a<d0 e�S ow 0o rzgQ m� s r_R8fL 8_-» 30 rd F1 � 88 �� AM t'l. is ii7 30 , F, I-yy y-1 tllP 11100 j gip yry�li: r1A01 K� a WSH WA mrm W. �AN HIS tg zs �go �i;0 10 bi49$ W N O• 10it i � g Z c JW hrs 1�2lO Z�3 $$W�YWI � J �o N_ ry Xn� MEN 6 9- 9 L/ L s z 'B 'W P- E 17 O 9 Z . O N J_ O v w J_ 1Np`vll: �33ar �S Ir2 -A Osal .n X;10 N 69e nw) b-------- o----------- -1 ._ iNoful"O 0-7 /o 0(310 O Ie. 1 W BIIL"1-7 In N ry a 8 N I p O Q IL w N w Ij2 Qq0 'A � Is 0 r Z 1 �„ 4 04 I� ¢zW nl crg-Vt9)z,fQY19 M .Oz.orm l- - 6 (,►s sos) ,fs sos 00'SLt) e 1�td Om a vZl C � 11 J - Q� O n '0 c20 �N c1 m LLl `, 1y I W A YfSn � 4 Q h hi = (.00. me) ,00 OA9 W 44 �• t -I � I I I I I• N O S v 3 d al 3 P ; ,96-cm At .09.0r-00 N -•�� - f9'9Af -----_---------- �i� n aT_T-T T-T-T_1T" i O MA N W* --794A.P f NI c J' I l N I--; I w LJ tIp 2 w I ( � e l01 III I---i I I 1 I ,f0'10C M.09,07-OON /,J ,IS N a0 M,OZ,OLOON Mj d ♦ ♦J ~ J J 0 b J ^ �r `� r-„ I I I OI p w _ % J I I ( Zip t bb n J I n N I I �\�. I �'� �7�tI� (i d O V N I� t- Sri N II� h t'�i ?< O Fes-• ZO M-+o,-m N 1 Z II R Ike l I �'7 j 90 � Ie ll rc ��q�'l�trWcf tr .q� ga x eage y 41CZ OWN r- I QOrhd nn wN ^ LLYh„`N ZI,� Zn �1 6 q i N�mu VVV law �Nltmttl Z 9 8 Z Z o N 1 0 V Id L N I1C)------------------- ----------------- N l wrosaz) ,f9'OC9L I a voa SM7Vcr 00.9rs M.ff-91.00N-_r(.lZ•L{G) ,IL'Lt9 M .f►,91.00 N 1. 101 I Y I N j-LeLl9)i,iezt9 M .f►,9L00 N I F, H--� `--r--ill.r--1 1 1 O I I I 1 J zz/czz 9 w I II I$ Z 'ON-LC3VHJ_ tOp c u n d d h z m o L void }' to n� M, all ��ol y� , t � wY 0l nd ii � m olga 0� ----.60,L --L-00--N ----------------------i� M N 3 N n a a 1. aJ IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT MAP NO. Z4gS7 -3 LOT T �r J Jr" A C: T i\J o, 24 J 97- 1 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF I NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, REMAINDER M.B. 303/51-33 TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST. SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN DUDEK & ASSOCIATES MAY 2001 N6839'40E 22A00 PALM DESERT. CA. 1ED POR. OF E 1/2 GRAPHIC SCALE 8 NOTE: OF THE NE 1/4 ; n SEE SHEET 2 FOR ENGINEER'S NOTES ` A LOT ' F' ; AND BASIS OF BEARINGS. OF SEC. 20, 3 f0' EA/7. RETENTION BASIN i IN 1� ) T. 5 S., R. 7 E. CI 0.701 AC 1 loch - 60 R N693136E Z 8 I 2 NOT A PART N693�'36'E POR. OF E 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 20, T. 5 S., R. 7 E. 21.50• 30 b 77.00' N 3 ' 72.00 72.00' � 6a0o 72.00' 72.00' 72.00' N 69 336 1' E 72.00' 577.00' I16.62 aaee' 1 7.W. tt nn 8I 29 ' 28 27 g 26 ' h 25 24 X. 23 ' e 22 21 .� ►" 20 O ala3 AC g g 0.174 A- 0.174 AC, M174 AC ttj 0.174 AC „� 0.174 ACj- 0.175 AC � 0.1n AC O a192 AC 0.311 At, q 31�,+j, 2 T R 1. 1 ( N3610'36'W 22.20' 2^ 2' 2^ 2^ 1 AU.E 2^ - I[D t0'E9- A- 14.20 / . C :yq"E 64, R a _ N00�0'20'w- 72, 7 6939 N MEMORIAL _ - 100' 7 . 72. C 7 40 E 5245 N 6939'40' E 6se oo_ LOT _ ' C' PLACE "�"� 523.43' aa17 AC:70- I473� 00• _ -�, �t\ f ----- N6939'40' ISO, -� M0039-40-E IftZ 106.26' 32 2 ' Itl s 64.00 72.00' 72.00' N -_ 72.00'• 3 A 72.00' 72.00' 29.45' C 6 Qi� b7 Jy+N• 6 M' SeMr�• NN33Z9'36"E g 10 .8 11 ; 12 $ 1d E511f. ; 13 .8 1&26' ; 3 14 .8 15 8 16 $ 17 � C22.20' ; 18 ry a172 AC. �.� $ 0. 19 0.331 AC.33 Z Q1n AC g0.165 ACalas j AC g 0,10 AC g0.163 2w AC g 0.10 AC g 0,10 AC. g a167 AC 2 2w 2^ ?$ f 1 �' n /o P.UE 2 a p�p� RD 2w 2 T 1rt1i011 / 7244' 7 • 7 N 69 39.40' E 776.44' 7 00' 7 72. 74. 111.48' 4' n 106.67• . 72.00• C1 �`N79 72.00' 72.00 72.00' 72.00' 72.00' N 6939'40' E 773.94• 72.00' 72.00' 91.27' N6939'4C are R ) t �p -- -- _-- r 3 3 ISO, o�A Si T. 9.; N' 8 . 8 7 . 8 6 . 8 5 °8 4 . 8 3 . 8 2 .$ 1 .BLOT 'G' ,p\ r1i a212 AC. g ��n16S wC, g 0.165 At g &IN AC. g 0.165 AC, g 0.16s AC. g n166 w- g a165 At g 0.16s AC. g RETENTION BASIN h� 0.209 W. ^ 1 P.LLL 2' IC ESfli. 2 '- 2' 2^ 2 ,1`�'„P; 2aIEO 2 w 2 N42'81'09 E \ N6617'59'W _ 34 �, 14._ � "Ac 11 CI .49' 7 . 12. 7 . 7 . 7 00' 7 N_ 1214 41 _ItKRad.)C 13 ` N 6939'40' E 645.44' A LOT D '� r INDEPENDENCE LOT B N 693940' E _732.2w _WAY --- , . s s to' Eslfr. I 1.875, C 14 ' a947 AC. _ 646.44' OONO''YO.20'W i 1, aaoo NO2'sf'29_Y!(R � 46 44' G .45 i -� 69.31' \-C 73.00' 73.00' -- N 40 73.00' -- 73.00' 73.00' -- 73.00' --- N 6939'40' E 116.93' 16-- N27'46.36E -- 1 P. A N433 72- 37.72 22.36' ; ` ; 3 OAS 3 10' ESYL 3 ; -N3°7Q-4► CR�_e_) A 8 4 7 8 4 8 $4 4 9 8 50 8 51 8 52 8 N69 39'4t . fo• E91r, o\ 4 - . g 0.166 AC g a16s AC g MIN AC. g 0.166 AC. g a16a AC. g 0.166 AC. ° 8^ g s oo' REMAINDER a219AC 2^ :- zw 8^ z^ z^ IprpAui�b 77.00' 73.00' 73.00' 73.00' 73.00' 73.00' 73.00' PDR. OF E 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 DF SEC, 20, T. 5 S., R. 7 E. SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS CURVE DATA CURVE RADIUS DELTA LENGTH TANGENT c 1 45.Op 44'1651 34.76 1a.31 C 2 45.00 ss 39 04 4171 23.75 C 3 4a00 66'22 46 53.70 30.5 C 4 43.00 4416 4f 34.60 16.32 C s 4s.o0 2123 22 166.99 C 6 103.00 1616 41 29.32 14.76 C 7 I03.00 1616 41 29.32 14.76 C 6 270.00 1032 2 49.6 24.91 C 9 270.00 23'2630 t10.62 56.10 c 10 270.00 34'00 57 160.29 a2.59 c 11 330.00 09'021 52 05 26.08 C 12 SSo.00 02's2 04 16.s2 a26 C 13 330.00 1134 21 6a.37 34.4I C 14 300.00 170109 a9.11 44.e9 C 15 330,00 151214 a7.S 44.04 C 16 270.00 02-3109 IIA 6.94 Ws 0 J c 0 � ' 0 U Z p� I J h _ J 8 r� U 18 V LOT ' H' -N42'51'09'E LANDSCAPE LOT 31.41 • 0.160 AC. -N4231'09'E J77?' LOT ' A' / I (EFFERSON STREET) 0.t03 AC G CD N w w r � LL a y` 10 . 0. I N Z I�♦.��yE N W MISS N � z y L.L� F.. ca• ./ Wzz Z lt, tt) f Cy n c4h NIH HE r N 6 ti. rs Q �f - a O i Z~ y /J A. VW i ,Y 2 Q 2 y F h f ' 14 co u� g Z z p Gl v1 - O Z < Cl) K i ♦♦ G S 41 Z N U yf Y 9i V x 0 L) W, •� LL to N z M40b� e^E F z ?' dC a s ' W 20.00' w C4 ' Z i m z C7 �' ♦h ' 3 a Wp� �W ; • Rb �Q L r Our-,�' W z ONNg� 2 CE W aooF Q• g��'; k' �I `��-'7�y3----__-- ram-• Z z a �;� �e O a W p A; ZI it it <$ ^' N r IL L<<D, A) -,Jr�r I Z ZOW� �V P•�� gA �� qi M��1 i1 ,i h N F I V) p.• �� ,ne n I. i0 phi .b �• '' CC 5 d m P Z Z, o ?� ? d '1..at q 0- am:) mp �Q L �/ q.; ♦� .n +Lire ' <�i AM1% 7► co V g Aa V q Q d IR clq h i • I ^.F O i t,' Y_� -• 1 PA �'$ : 'mil yy►►•.. •� h 11, '8 .'' Ig "., .Sn''�. � .r P •'. r� a i�'�' ,♦M1 � �i mot: ti d �i' M1O �' -'°r 6 � I I'�i} Oe • /�' Q' `� �,�',+p � < 9> •g�Q. � b; , G �►ry' �i° ►M1 - o R n .f♦8 I :CV) V J�� , vvI ,` •`r� ' M N '� \°i ♦ �V < Rod.) r ♦ d M1o. "VI U b N41'39.23�E a t}7 t{t fQ 1t tad• ~ d �. ` 1 O♦ CO At C16 4: co Cv -�' °n ►�� M1M1�• � 1 1/ .°r� ♦ • bb • �r� � � t� ''e�' J .'c$� 1� y �'� � '�+ t ti♦6 M1M1 cat " �` �'' M lb co �/P ♦off: ♦ �' ^ °a~ d ♦ i `t� 'tea ry♦b � N � 1 j •° bpi w r r O ♦ \ 11.1 LU N\ q, v, co o h0� Q O U LU CC ti i A, a .g to p 4- 1 . Q (\ 088 15:111SIMEMOMEN 010 aeao ATTACHMENT 3 CITY of LA QUINTA SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT Tract 24197-3 THIS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this 7th day of . August , 20 01 , by and between Monticello, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company hereinafter referred to as "Subdivider," and the City of La Quinta, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City." RECITALS: A. Subdivider has prepared and filed a final map or parcel map (the "Map") of a unit of land in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, which unit of land is known as Tract No. 24197-3 (the "Tract") pursuant to the provisions of Section 66410, et sec. of the California Government Code (the "Subdivision Map Act"). B. Prior to approval of the Map, Subdivider is required to install or agree to install certain public and private improvements (the "Improvements"). C. The Improvements have not been installed and accepted at this time. D. It is therefore necessary that Subdivider and City enter into an agreement for the installation of the Improvements as provided in Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Improvement Plans. Prior to submittal of the Map for approval by the City Council, Subdivider shall furnish original improvement plans meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. 2. Improvements. Subdivider shall construct the public and private street, drainage, utility, landscaping, and other improvements required to be constructed or agreed to be constructed under this Agreement as listed in Exhibit "A", and shall bear the full cost thereof. The methods, standards, specifications, sequence, and scheduling of construction shall be as approved by the City Engineer. 3. Improvement Security. A. One class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "performance security," shall assure the faithful performance of this Agreement including construction of the Improvements, payment of Subdivider's fair share of Improvements which have been or will be constructed by others ("Participatory Improvements"), and payment of plan check and permit fees. A second class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "payment security," shall assure the payment of the cost of labor, equipment and materials supplied to construct the Improvements. A third class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "warranty security," shall serve as a guarantee and warranty of the Improvements for a period of one year following the completion and acceptance of the Improvements. Subdivider shall furnish performance and payment security prior to and as a condition of City Council approval of the Map. Subdivider shall provide warranty security after Improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council and prior to or concurrently with the final release of performance security. Warranty security shall not be required for Monumentation or Participatory Improvements. However, the City may utilize Monumentation Security for performance of or payment for the work in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. As part of the obligation secured by each of the performance security, payment security and warranty security, and in addition to the face amount of each such security, each such security shall include and assure the payment of costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing the obligations thereby secured. B. Improvement security shall conform with Section 66499 of the California Government Code and one or more of the following: 1) A cash deposit with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company, at City's option. T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\Martinez\Tracts\agreements\24197-3.wpd Page 1 of 6 089 Oil 2) Surety bonds, of the form specified in subsection 66499.2 of the California Government Code, issued by a surety or sureties listed in the U.S. Department of Treasury Circular 570 (latest version). 3) Certificates of deposit, in City's name, from one or more financial institutions subject to regulation by the state or federal government and having a financial quality rating of "A" or better and a commitment reliability rating of " R-2" or better on the Investment Data Exchange (of the Los Angeles County Treasurer's office). 4) Irrevocable letters of credit, issued by one or more financial institutions meeting the requirements of Paragraph (3), pledging that the funds necessary to carry out the completion of the Improvements are on deposit, guaranteed for payment, and constitute a trust fund which is not subject to levy or attachment by any creditor of the depositor until released by City. Letters of credit shall guarantee that all or any portion of the funds available pursuant to the letters of credit will be paid upon the written demand of City and that such written demand need not present documentation of any type as a condition of payment, including proof of loss. The duration of any such letter of credit shall be for a period of not less than one year from the execution of the agreement with which it is provided and shall state, on its face, that the letter of credit will be automatically renewed until such time that City authorizes its expiration or until sixty (60) days after City receives notice from the financial institution of intent to allow expiration of the letter of credit. 5) A lien upon the subdivided property, if City finds that it would not be in the public interest to require the installation of the Improvements sooner than two (2) years after recordation of the final map or parcel map for which the Improvements are required. The lien shall provide a collateral value of three (3) times the estimated cost of the Improvements and shall include the power of sale of the real property, all buildings and improvements thereon, or that may be erected upon or made thereto, together with all hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in any wise appertaining, and the reservations, remainders, rents, issues, and profits thereof. The collateral value of the property shall be established at Subdivider's expense through an appraisal approved by City. 6) An instrument of credit from an agency of the state, federal or local government, when any agency of the state, federal, or local government provides at least Twenty Percent (20%) of the financing for the Improvements. 7) When Subdivider is a non-profit organization, security may be negotiable bonds, of the kind approved for securing deposits of public moneys with City or in favor of City, as specified in Section 16430 of the California Government Code, deposited, at City's option, with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company. C. All securities shall be furnished in accordance with the provisions of Exhibit A. The amount of the performance security shall equal One Hundred Percent (100%) of the estimated cost of constructing the Improvements, including payment of plan check and permit fees, as estimated by the City Engineer or a duly authorized representative of the City Engineer. The amount of Payment security shall equal the amount of the amount of performance security, except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A, and shall be furnished as a separate security. Warranty security shall equal Ten Percent (10%) of the amount of performance security except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A. D. At the time of submittal of security, Subdivider shall pay to City administrative fees applicable to the form of security provided. Administrative fees shall apply to the subdivision (final map, parcel map or waiver of parcel map) rather than to individual security instruments. The fees shall be paid separately for each different form and/or source (surety or financial institution) of security initially submitted and for substitution of securities but shall not be required for submittal of warranty security if the warranty security is of the same form and from the same source as the performance security it replaces. Administrative fees for security shall be as follows: 1) For certificates of deposit, bonds and letters of credit as described in Paragraphs 2), 3) and 4) of SECTION 3.B., which require the establishment of evidence of the reliability of the surety or financial institution, the administrative fee shall be One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00). T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\Martinez\Tracts\agreements\24197-3.wpd 090 Page 2 of 6 012 2) For liens on real property as described in Paragraph 5) of SECTION 3.B., for which City will prepare lien agreements and subordination agreements, administer valuation of the real property and administer the agreements over the life of the lien, all of which require legal assistance and financial advice, Subdivider shall pay to City an administration fee of One Half of One Percent (0.5%) of the estimated cost of the improvements secured but not less than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) nor more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00). 3) For other forms of security listed in Section 3 B, above, there will be no administrative fee. E. Participatory Improvements, if any, are identified in Exhibit A. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place until the Participatory Improvements are constructed and actual costs are known and paid by Subdivider, or until Subdivider pays to City the estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements, and shall guarantee the reimbursement by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost of the Participatory Improvements. Payment security and warranty security shall not be required for Participatory Improvements. Upon written demand from City, Subdivider shall deposit cash with City in lieu of or in replacement of security guaranteeing Participatory Improvements. If Subdivider fails to deposit said cash within 30 days of the date of the written demand from City, City may present a written demand to Subdivider's Surety for payment of said cash and Subdivider's Surety shall pay to City the lesser of: 1) the amount demanded, or 2) the amount of the security. F. Security shall not expire, be reduced or become wholly or partially invalid for any reason, including non-payment of premiums, modifications of this Agreement and/or expiration of the time for performance stated in this Agreement, without express authorization from City unless the surety provides City with sixty (60) days written notice by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. G. Security shall be released in the following manner: 1) Performance security shall be released upon the final completion and acceptance or approval, by the City Council of the Improvements subject to the provisions of paragraph B. 2) The City Engineer may authorize partial reduction of performance security as work progresses, upon application by Subdivider. However, no such reduction shall be for an amount less than Ten Percent (10%) of the total performance security provided for the faithful performance of the act or work. In no event shall security be reduced below that required to guarantee the completion of the act or work or obligation secured, plus Ten Percent (10%). The City Engineer shall not allow more than two partial reductions of security furnished for any improvement agreement. 3) Participatory Improvement security shall be released upon payment by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost or estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements. 4) If City receives no notice of recorded claims of lien, labor and materials security shall be released in full 90 days after final acceptance and/or approval by the City Council, of the Improvements. If City receives notice of any recorded lien, the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act shall apply. 5) Warranty security not utilized during the warranty period shall be released one year after final acceptance or approval by the City Council of all Tract Improvements. However, if at the end of the one-year warranty period, there are one or more outstanding requests by City for performance of work or provision of materials under the terms of the warranty, warranty security shall be retained until the outstanding requests are satisfied or until Subdivider has made other arrangements satisfactory to the City Engineer. 4. Permits Required. Prior to commencing any phase of work, Subdivider shall obtain all permits required for that phase of work and pay all required fees. Work performed under a permit or permits shall comply with all provisions of the required permits. 5. Off -site Improvements. When the construction of one or more of the Improvements requires or necessitates the acquisition of real property not owned by Subdivider or City, Subdivider shall use its best efforts purchase such real property at a reasonable price. In the event that Subdivider is unsuccessful, despite its best efforts, to acquire such real property at a reasonable price, Subdivider may request in writing that City attempt T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\Martinez\Tracts\agreements\24197-3.wpd 091 Page 3 of 6 013 to acquire such real property. City may, but is not required to, agree to attempt to acquire such real property on behalf of Subdivider. If City so agrees, City and Subdivider shall enter a separate written agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Said separate agreement shall provide that Subdivider advance to City One Hundred Fifty Percent (150%) of the appraised fair market value of the real property. Any unexpended portion of said advance shall be refunded to Subdivider. Any additional funds required for acquisition of the real property shall be paid by Subdivider to City upon the conveyance of said real property to Subdivider. In no event shall the failure of Subdivider or City to acquire such real property excuse, waive, or otherwise terminate Subdivider's obligation to construct the applicable improvement pursuant to this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval. 6. Completion of Improvements. Subdivider shall begin construction of the Improvements within ninety (90) days and shall complete construction within twelve (12) months after the approval of this Agreement. Portions of the Improvements may be completed at a later date, as determined by the City Engineer or as set forth in Exhibit A. Failure by Subdivider to begin or complete construction of the Improvements within the specified time periods shall constitute cause for City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare Subdivider in default of this agreement, to revise improvement security requirements as necessary to ensure completion of the improvements, and/or to require modifications in the standards or sequencing of the Improvements in response to changes in standards or conditions affecting or affected by the Improvements. Said failure shall not otherwise affect the validity of this agreement or Subdivider's obligations hereunder. 7. Force Majeure. In the event that Subdivider is unable to perform within the time limits herein due to strikes, act of God, or other events beyond Subdividers control, the time limits for obligations affected by such events will be extended by the period of such events. 8. Time Extension. Subdivider may make application in writing to the City Council for an extension of time for completion of the Improvements. The City Council, in its sole and absolute discretion, may approve or deny the request or conditionally approve the extension with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. As a condition of the time extension, Subdivider shall furnish securities, similar in form and substance to those required in SECTION 3 hereinabove, to cover the period of extension. The value of the securities shall be sufficient to ensure the performance of and payment for Improvements that remain incomplete at the time of the extension, and to provide warranty security on completed Improvements. 9. Survey Monuments. Before final approval of street improvements, Subdivider shall place survey monuments in accordance with the provisions of Sections 66495, et sec. of the Subdivision Map Act and of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Subdivider shall provide the City Engineer written proof that the monuments have been set, evidence of payment and receipt thereof by the engineer or surveyor setting the monuments, and intersection monument tie -outs for monuments set in public streets. 10. Final Acceptance of Improvements. At the completion of construction and prior to acceptance of the Improvements by City, Subdivider shall submit a request for final approval by City. The request shall be accompanied by any required certifications from Subdividers engineers or surveyors, approval letters from other agencies having jurisdiction over and approval authority for improvements required by this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval, and any required construction quality documentation not previously submitted. Upon receipt of said request, the City Engineer or a duly -authorized representative will review the required documentation and will inspect the Improvements. If the Improvements are determined to be in accordance with applicable City standards and specifications, and as provided herein, obligations required by the Conditions of Approval and this Agreement have been satisfied, and Subdivider has provided revised plans as required in Paragraph 11, hereinafter, the City Engineer shall recommend acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council. 11. Revisions to Plans. When the Improvements have been inspected and approved by the City Engineer, Subdivider shall make any necessary revisions to the original plans held by City so the plans depict the actual Improvements constructed. When necessary revisions have been made, each separate sheet of the plans shall be clearly marked with the words "As -Built," "As -Constructed," or "Record Drawing," the marking shall be stamped T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\Martinez\Tracts\agreements\24197-3.wpd 092 Page 4 of 6 014 by an engineer or surveyor, as appropriate for the improvements thereon, who is licensed to practice in California, and the plans shall be resubmitted to the City Engineer. 12. Improvement Warranty. Subdivider hereby guarantees the Improvements to City for a period of one (1) year, beginning on the date of final acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council, against any defective work or labor done, or defective materials furnished, and shall repair or replace such defective work or materials. 13. Release of Security. City shall retain and release securities in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of this agreement. Prior to the release of payment security, the City Engineer may require Subdivider to provide a title report or other evidence sufficient to show claims of lien, if any, that may affect the amount of payment security released. 14. City Right to Cure. If Subdivider fails to perform any obligation hereunder and such obligation has not been performed within sixty (60) days after written notice of default from City, then City may perform the obligation, and Subdivider shall pay the entire cost of such performance by City including costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing such obligation. In cases of emergency or compelling public interest, as determined by the City Engineer, the requirement for written notice of default and/or the passage of sixty (60) days shall be deemed waived and all other provisions of this Article shall remain in effect. 15. Indemnification. Subdivider hereby binds itself, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, executors, administrators, guarantors, heirs, and assigns, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold City and its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and assigns harmless from and against any losses, claims, demands, actions, or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, arising out of or in any way connected with Subdivider's performance herein under, including costs of suit and reasonable attorneys' fees. 16. No Modification of Conditions. This Agreement shall in no respect act to modify or amend any provision of the Conditions of Approval. In the event that any requirement or condition of this Agreement is inconsistent with or fails to include one or more provisions of the Conditions of Approval, which document(s) is (are) incorporated herein by reference, the provisions in the Conditions of Approval shall remain in effect and shall control. 17. Severability. In the event that any provision or provisions of this Agreement are held unenforceable, all provisions not so held shall remain in full force and effect. 18. General Provisions A. All notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the parties at their respective addresses indicated hereon. Notices personally delivered shall be effective upon delivery. Notices mailed as provided herein and sent postage prepaid shall be effective upon the date of delivery or refusal indicated on the return receipt. Either party may change its address for notices hereunder by notice to the other given in the manner provided in this subparagraph. B. The terms, conditions, covenants, and agreements set forth herein shall apply to and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors of the parties hereto. C. Neither party to this Agreement relies upon any warranty or representation not contained in this Agreement. D. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted with respect to the laws of the State of California. E. In the event of any dispute between the parties with respect to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to prompt payment of its reasonable attorneys' fees from the non -prevailing party. F. Any failure or delay by either party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any such rights or remedies provided for hereunder. T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\Martinez\Tracts\agreements\24197-3.wpd 093 Page 5 of 6 015 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. CITY: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 760/777-7075 Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk SUBDIVIDER: Date Monticello LLC, A California Limited Liability Co. By Century Crowell Communities, LP, A California Limited Partnership, Managing Member, By: Century Homes Communities a Califomia Corporation, its General Partner (909)381-6007 By: August 7, 2001 Date Titj� ..``Gary Weintraub, Vice President By: Date Title: /4 Reviewed and Approved: GV 0let City Engineer Date Approved as to Form: City Attorney Date T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\Martinez\Tracts\agreements\24197-3.wpd 094 Page 6 of 6 016 Exhibit A SECURITY - TRACT 24197-3 Except as otherwise provided herein, Subdivider shall furnish performance security and labor & materials security prior to agendization of the Map for approval by the City Council. Improvements designated as "Participatory" have been or will be constructed by others. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place indefinitely until called upon or released by City. Monumentation security shall guarantee performance of or payment for the work and shall be utilized or released as specified in Chapter 4, Article 9 of the Subdivision Map Act. The "Engineering & Plans" security will be released when the City has possession of complete, approved, original plans, signed and sealed by a design professional(s), for all required improvements. The "No -Plan Contingency", which may be utilized for any listed item or for other cost found necessary in the design or construction of the required improvements, may be released in whole or part by the City Engineer, at any time after construction plans are complete and the scope and nature of improvements are fully known. These releases shall be separate from and in addition to the reductions discussed below. As elements of the work are completed, Subdivider may request a maximum of two partial releases of performance security. Partial releases shall be for not less than ten percent (10%) of the total performance security for the tract and shall not reduce total performance security below the amount necessary to complete the Improvements plus ten percent (10%) of the original amount. Partial releases of performance security will be evaluated and may be granted, in whole or in part, by the City Engineer. Requests for partial releases, setting forth in detail the amount of work completed and the value thereof, shall be made in writing to the City Engineer. Labor & materials security shall remain in place until 90 days after all required tract improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council. Improvement Description Performance Labor & Materials Grading 307,790 307,790 Streets 302,290 302,290 Domestic Water 219,950 219,950 Sanitary Sewer 123,720 123,720 Dry Utilities 93,600 93,600 Perimeter Wall 31,200 31,200 Monumentation 10,000 0 Construction Subtotal: $1,088,550 $1,078,550 Engineering & Plans (20% of Construction) 217,710 No -Plans Contingency (25% of Project) 326,565 Total: $1,632,825 095 017 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CENTURY HOMES COMMUNITIES, A CALIFORNIA CO -)n February 2, 2001, at 10:00 a.m., a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors of Century Homes Communities was held at the Corporation's office at 1535 So. "D" Street, San Bernardino, California: SIGNING AUTHORIZATION: RATIFICATION OF PRIOR ACTS WHEREAS, the Corporation is the general partner of Century- Crowell Communities, L.P., a California limited partnership ("Century Crowell"); WHEREAS, Century Crowell was formed for the purpose of acquiring land and developing same with single family homes; WHEREAS, the Corporation has determined that it is in the best interests of Century Crowell that ownership in each Century Crowell project ("Project') be vested in a limited liability company or limited partnership ("Project Entity'); WHEREAS, primary responsibility for management of the Projects has been delegated to the corporation's Project Managers, who are Kenny Felkel, Marty Butler, Rod Grinberg and Dave Cooper.. RESOLVED, that in connection with the development of any Project, any Project Manager (or Gary Weintraub as Vice President or Assistant Secretary) is authorized to sign on behalf of the Corporation, as general partner of Century Crowell, acting in its capacity as Manager or General Partner of any Project Entity, and as general P contractor to the Projects, any and all documents in connection with plan checks, permits, entitlements, and all other documents relating to city, county, water district and other governmental agency actions respecting the Projects. RESOLVED, that in connection with the development of any Project, either Gary Weintraub, as Vice President, or David J. Miller, as Assistant Secretary, .signing alone (or, if required; either Gary Weintraub or David J._ Miller, together with any Project Director) are authorized to sign on behalf of the Corporation, as bonds and all er of Century Crowell, acting in its capacity as Manager or General Partner of any Project Entity, surety documents relating to same, in connection with the Projects. RESOLVED, that Joyce Montgomery or David J. Miller are authorized to sign on behalf of the Corporation, as general partner of Century Crowell, acting in its capacity as Manager or General Partner of any Project Entity and as general contractor to the Projects, all documents as required for the issuance of the DRE Public Report for the Projects. RESOLVED, that copies of these Minutes may be provided to any person or public agency eON requiring evidence of authorization. ALL SUCH PERSONS OR PUBLIC AGENCIES SIGNING ONLY. IN THE NOTICE THAT ALL AUTHORIZED SIGNATORIES HEREUNDER PERSONALLY LIABLE FOR ANY CAPACITIES SET FORTH HEREIN AND ARE NOT INDIVIDUALLY DEBTS OR OBLIGATIONS OF THE CORPORATION, CENTURY CROWELL OR ANY PROJECT ENTITY. All Directors were present and unanimously consented to the above. DATE: February 2, 2001 ATTEST: WT. Pavelak, President 1✓-n 0. Vincent, Assistant Secretary Upa\n inntes\corporat\020201.doc CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On this 7th day of August, 2001 before me, Doris A. Benoit, Notary Public, personally appeared Gary Weintraub, personally known to me, to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same in her authorized capacity, and that by her signature on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. this area for official Notarial Seal WITNESS my hand and ficial seal. ILL Signature of Notary Public DORIS A iBENOiT I Commission # 1310451 .,iNotary Public - California San Bernardino Courtly My Comm E)ph,9s Jun 24, 2M5 DOCUMENT TYPE SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT TRACT 24197-3 6 PAGES DATED 8/7/01 097 r;19 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Authorization for Overnight Travel for the Public Works Assistant Engineer I to Attend the Fundamentals of Inspection Practice Sponsored by the University of California Berkeley, Institute of Transportation Studies in San Luis Obispo, California on October 10, 2001 through October 11, 2001 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: go] Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Public Works Assistant Engineer I to attend a 2-day Fundamentals of Inspection Practice sponsored by the University of California Berkeley, Institute of Transportation Studies in San Luis Obispo, California on October 10, 2001 through October 11, 2001. The breakdown of estimated expenditures for this training is as follows: ► Registration $ 170.00 ► Room $ 290.00 ► Travel $ 210.00 ► Meals $ 100.00 Total $ 770.00 Funds have been approved for this conference as part of the Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 Budget in the Public Works Development/Traffic Travel and Training Account #101- 452-637-000. None. TAPWDEPT\C0UNCIL\2001 \010821 c.wpd The Fundamentals of Inspection Practice is sponsored by the University of California Berkeley, Institute of Transportation Studies. This training is for the public agency engineer who is responsible for the physical observation and inspection of construction work on the job site. Various topics to be discussed include elements of construction administration and management, construction safety, inspection methods for various construction materials, the scope of an inspector's authority and responsibility, and project closeout. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Public Works Assistant Engineer I to attend a 2-day Fundamentals of Inspection Practice sponsored by the University of California Berkeley, Institute of Transportation Studies in San Luis Obispo, California on October 10, 2001 through October 11, 2001; or 2. Do not approve authorization for overnight travel for the Public Works Assistant Engineer I to attend a 2-day Fundamentals of Inspection Practice sponsored by the University of California Berkeley, Institute of Transportation Studies in San Luis Obispo, California on October 10, 2001 through October 11, 2001; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Chris A. Vog Public Works Director/City Engineer Ap rov for submission b Thomas P. Genovese City Manager TAPWDEPT\C0UNCIL\2001\010821c.wpd 02 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: %O STUDY SESSION: Authorization for Overnight Travel for the Community PUBLIC HEARING: Safety Manager to Attend a Training Conference Given by The California Emergency Services Association, Located in Kelseyville, CA, September 24 through 28, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Community Safety Manager to attend a Training Conference given by the California Emergency Services Association, located in Kelseyville, CA, September 24 through 28, 2001. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The training will be funded from Travel, Training and Meetings Account #101-355- 637-000. The breakdown of estimated expenditures for this class is as follows: ♦ Registration $ 375 ♦ Meals 125 ♦ Travel 600 ♦ Hotel 500 Total $ 1600 CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: This conference will cover past disaster responses, disaster preparations, terrorism issues, school disasters, planning for people with disabilities, etc. There will be presentations by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Office of Emergency Services, and many others. 100 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Community Safety Manger to attend the Training Conference given by The California Emergency Services Association, located in Kelseyville, CA, September 24 through 28, 2001; or 2. Do not approve the request for overnight travel; or I Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, 110,00, Tom Hartung, Building and Safety Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Conference overview showing training subjects 101 n l.U111G1 C111:G 1lC1d11b ATTACHMENT 1 re -Conference Training, facilitated by CDF, addresses the most common rol( icident Command System filled by emergency managers: the Liason Officer point of contact for outside agencies coming into your EOC; and the Agency l )meone else's EOC. PRINT THIS FORM. FILL OUT AND SEND IN ------------------------------------------------------------- Membership# Name: Organization: Address: City / Zip: PRE -CONFERENCE: ❑ Shuttle $50 Airline: Time of arrival CONFERENCE FEE: Meal receipts provided ------------------------------------------------ REGISTRATION - Please print Legibly - One Resistration per form Title:— E-mail: Phone: Fax: ❑ Golf Tournament $50 LJ Pre -Conference Training ❑ Late Golf After 8/24 $60 (free to registrants - includes ❑ Golf BBQ (spectator) $15 IJ Special Needs? ❑ Member $325 Late $375 aon Member $375 Late $42 LJ Single Day / $150 / Day Attending: ❑ Guest $60 / day (meals only) / DaY() Attending: : Choose Thursday afternoon presentations - one per session (see schedule for description) Session 1 (2:00 - 3:30) Session 2 (3:45 - 5:15) A B C D A B C D Make checks payable to: CESA Coastal Chapter Tax ID: 77-01492,e Mail check and registration to: Sunnyvale DPS / Cherel Sampson/ Emerg. 700 All American Way Sunanvale, CA 94086 Registrations due September T, 2001. $50 late registration fee after 09/07/01. Questions or Comments to Cherel Sampson, Registrar, at (408) 730-7198, fax (408) 749-0166 or e csampson@ci.sunnyvale.ca.us Cancellation policy: Please note the conference cancellation policy: If you are unable to attend the conference due to un-forseen circumstances the conference registrar (Cherel Sampson) must receive in writing your cancellation notice by September 14, 2001. Cancellation notices received after September 14, 2001 and "no-shows" will not be refunded. 102 Home page http://www.cesa.net/conference—details.htm ariuiNv vv vnnOnur Page 2 of 3 ICS/SEMS for the Private Sector — R Baenan, Burbank Fire & Mario Guerra, Warner Brothers. Explains how the City of Burbank and Warner Brothers Studios partnered to modify ICS/SEMS for the private sector. Energy .Impacts on the Public/Private Sectors — K. Griffith, California Energy Commission. Update on what's been going on and what to expect in the future. Tactical School Site Survey — Noah Brommeland, Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office — Introduces an award winning interactive CD that can be used by any jurisdiction to provide pre - planned response for schools and businesses. Planning for People NN"ith Disabilities — N1. Paravagna, Department of Rehabilitation - Issues related to providing emergency response planning guidance to people with limited mobility, visual or hearing impairment, or chronic illness. Napa Earthquake — Neal O'Haire, Napa Co. OES It wasn't "The Big One," but the damage and community disniption were significant. What lessons can businesses and governments learn? Is mitigation worth the cost and etTort? http://www.cesa.net/coastal/conference-2001.htm Managing the Corporate EOC in Sustained Operations — Regina Phelps, Emergency Management & Safety Solutions - Recruiting, training and staffing a corporate EOC for the long haul: labor issues, facility considerations, management concerns. CDF & the "Total Force" Concept — Dave Driscoll, CDF. How to tap into other agencies' expertise instead of stripping your own department. N FPA 1600 and the Private Sector — Raelene Wong, Solectron How does the national standard for emergency preparedness guide businesses to successful business continuity and resumption plannin;_�? Issues in Agricultural Terrorism — Amy Smithson, Ph.d, Henry L. Stimson Center National security agencies cite domestic terrorism as the largest threat facing America's communities. While traditional terrorism using explosives continues, more nations are developing capabilities to attack their adversaries with weapons of mass destruction: nuclear/radiological, biological and chemical. What can your community or business do to protect itself? How do you harden the target? What are the threats? Impact of Disaster on Business — A. Judd, Small Business Administration E-Business Continuity — Ellen Pifer, Hewlett-Packard — 1-0 3 01 "." 14 V r r V1\11J11%jr Page J or j Tips and tricks on how to conduct successful meetings: • • Power Point & Emergency Management — A. Martinet, LA Area G Graphic Meeting Facilitation — Pat Jocius, San Mateo OES Meeting Facilitation: Conducting productive meetings and staying on task - Kent Paxton, San Francisco OES FEMA: Mitigation 2001 — Sally Ziolkowski, FEMA. Explanation of the new FEMA hazard mitigation program. Congress has passed The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. What does that mean to cities for the coming years? How can pre - disaster mitigation funding enable a higher level of disaster mitigation in the future? Violence in the Workplace — Regina Phelps, Emergency Management & Safety Solutions - "Going Postal" has become too frequent in large organizations. How can employers ensure a safe working environment" How can workplace violence be anticipated and prevented? For Hotel Reservations 800-660-LAKE (5253) http://www.koiioctihai-bor.com/ Home page http://www.cesa.net/coastal/conference-2001.htm 104 0a��T ur 4 V 5 OF'9w AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: �l ITEM TITLE: Approval of Program Supplemental STUDY SESSION: Agreement No. STPL 5433 (004) for Preliminary Engineering on Avenue 52, from Jefferson Street to PUBLIC HEARING: Centrino, Project 99-04 Authorize the City Manager to execute Agency -State Agreement STPL 5433 (004) covering the preliminary engineering phase of Project 99-04, Avenue 52 Safety Improvements, from Jefferson Street to Centrino. The following represents the available funding and funding sources: Funding Source Surface Transportation Program Funds Infrastructure Funds The following represents the project budget: Construction: Design Inspection/Testing: Administration: Account Number Amount 401-000-466-486 $67,000 401-000-493-000 $15,243 TOTAL: $ 82, 243 $67,000 $ 6, 700 $5,193 $3,350 TOTAL: $ 8 2, 243 If the Supplemental Agreement 004 (Attachment 1) is approved, the City will be reimbursed up to a maximum of $6,030 for design. An additional supplemental agreement will be executed for the construction phase of the project. 105 T:\PWDEPT\C0UNCIL\2001 \010821 k.wpd Since this project is partially funded with Federal funding, the project must be bid utilizing prevailing wage. Therefore, there are no Charter City implications. The proposed safety improvements on Avenue 52, from Jefferson Street west to Centrino, include widening the existing shoulder on the south side of the street by 6 feet and modification to the signing and striping on the south side of the street. A vicinity map is attached as Attachment 2. In June 1998, the project was submitted to Caltrans for funding in the Fiscal Year 2000/2001 Hazard Elimination Safety (HES) Program. The project was approved to receive HES funding on July 15, 1999. The project was approved by the City Council as part of the Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). On July 17, 2001, Caltrans approved the City of La Quinta's obligation submittal package for the proposed safety improvements and authorized the City to proceed with design. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Authorize the City Manager to execute Agency -State Agreement STPL 5433 (004) covering the preliminary engineering phase of Project 99-04, Avenue 52 Safety Improvements, from Jefferson Street to Centrino; or 2. Do not authorize the City Manager to execute Agency -State Agreement STPL 5433 (004) covering the preliminary engineering phase of Project 99-04, Avenue 52 Safety Improvements, from Jefferson Street to Centrino; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Res ctfks i t d, IVt . Cam, Vh� s A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved or submission by: PT P. Genovese City Manager R 106 002 TAMDEMCOUNCIL\2001 \010821 k.wpd Attachments: 1 . Program Supplement Agreement No. 004 2. Vicinity Map 107 003 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2001 \010821 k.wpd ATTACHMENT 1 PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. M0 04 Date: July 30, 2001 to Location: 08-RIV-0-LQNT ADMINISTERING AGENCY -STATE AGREEMENT Project Number:STPLH-5433(004) FOR FEDERAL -AID PROJECTS NO. 0 8 - 54 3 3 E.A. Number: 08-924649 This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the Agency -State Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into between the Agency and the State on 05/05/97 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Article I of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. , approved by the Agency on (See copy attached). The Agency further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with the covenants or remarks setforth on the following pages. PROJECT LOCATION: Avenue 52 from Cetrino to Jefferson Street TYPE OF WORK: Remove obstacles & shoulder widening LENGTH: 0 (MILES ) PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF WORK [X] Preliminary Engineering f 1 Construction Engineering [ ] Right -Of -Way [ ] Construction Estimated Cost Federal Funds Matching Funds $6,700.00 Q28 $6,030.00 LOCAL $670.00 $0.00 OTHER $0.00 CITY OF LA QUINTA By STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation By Chief, Office of Local Programs Date Project Implementation Attest Date Title I hereby certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance: Accounting Offic Date �' '$6,030.00 Chapter Statutes Item Year Pro BC Category Fund Source AMOUNT 52 2000 2660-101-890 2000-2 01 20.30. 30 C 255020 892-F 6,030.00 Program Supplement 08-5433-M004- ISTEA Page 1 of 2 005 `08-RIV=O-LQNT 07/30/2001 STPLH-5433(004) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS 1. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY will reimburse the State for their share of costs for work requested to be performed by the State. 2. This Program Supplement will be revised at a later date to include other phases of work. 3. All maintenance, involving the physical condition and the operation of the improvements, referred to in Article III MAINTENANCE of the aforementioned Master Agreement will be the responsibility of the ADMINISTERING AGENCY and shall be performed at regular intervals or as required for efficient operation of the completed improvements. 4. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY is required to have an audit in accordance with the Single Audit'Act and OMB A-133, if it receives $300,000 or more in federal funds in a single fiscal year. The federal funds received under this project are a part of the Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) 20.205, Highway Planning and Research. OMB A-133 superceded OMB A-128 in 1996. Reference to OMB A-128 in Master Agreement (if any) is superceded by this covenant. 5. Award information shall be submitted by the ADMINISTERING AGENCY to the District Local Assistance Engineer immediately after the award. Failure to do so will cause delay in processing the invoices for the construction phase. Please refer to Section 15.7 "Award Package" of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual. 6. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that payment of Federal funds will be limited to the amounts approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in the. Federal -Aid Project Authorization/Agreement or Amendment/Modification (E-76) and accepts any increases in ADMINISTERING AGENCY funds as shown on the Finance or Bid letter or its modification as prepared by the Division of Local Assistance, Office of Project Implementation. ios Program Supplement08-5433-M004- ISTEA Page 2 of 2 006 ATTACHMENT 2 Agency: 08-RIV-0-LQNT Project Number: STPLH 5433 ( ) Project Location: Avenue 52 Safety Improvement Project Project Description•:: The Project is located on Avenue 52, between Jefferson Street and Cetrino, within the City of La Quinta. Proposed improvements are safety related and consists of widening the existing shoulder by 6.feet, and signing and striping. All the above improvements shall be constructed within the existing right-of-way. LA QUINTA, CA, 92253, US • E 110 007 Vicinity Map August 21, 2001 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: Adoption of a Resolution Approving Salary Range Adjustments for Management, Contract Management and Confidential Classifications RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: �► STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution approving salary range adjustments for specific management, contract management and confidential classifications. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Adjustments of salary ranges for management, contract management and confidential classifications will be implemented as outlined in Exhibit "A" of the resolution. The specific fiscal impact will be determined as employees move upward through the range(s). BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: A Resolution has been prepared and is submitted herein that would authorize salary range adjustments for management, contract management, and confidential classifications. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 2. 3. Adopt a Resolution approving the salary range adjustments for management, contract management and confidential classifications; or Do not adopt a Resolution approving salary range adjustments for management, contract management and confidential classifications; or Provide staff with alternative direction. ill Respectfully submitted, Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 112 RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADJUSTMENTS IN SALARY RANGE FOR MANAGEMENT, CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AND CONFIDENTIAL CLASSIFICATIONS WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta, hereinafter referred to as "City,"will make adjustments in salary range for specific management, contract management and confidential classifications. WHEREAS, The City has identified contract management employees as the: City Manager, Assistant City Manager, City Clerk, Community Services Director and the Public Works Director/City Engineer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: Section 1. The City does hereby approve, ratify, and authorize for specific management, contract management and confidential employees implementation of salary range adjustments as set forth in Exhibit "A." PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 21 st day of August, 2001, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 113 003 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON , City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 114 00i o"s ue t * / Z GV':A • 9/aIIQ I / I 1 a o r. � EXHIBIT A MANAGEMENT, CONTRACT AND CONFIDENTIAL RANGES EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2001 Accounting Manager 70 Assistant City Manager 90 Building and Safety Director 84 Building and Safety Manager 68 City Clerk 77 Community Development Director 86 Community Safety Manager 68 Community Services Director 77 Finance Director 84 Maintenance Manager 68 Management Analyst 63 Management Assistant 60 Personnel/Risk Manager 76 Planning Manager 76 Principal Planner 68 Public Works Director 86 Secretary (Confidential) 43 Senior Engineer (licensed) 76 Senior Engineer 72 115 August 21, 2001 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: Adoption of a Resolution and an Amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding with the La Quinta City Employees Association Regarding Salary Range Adjustments RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 13 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a resolution of the City Council and an amendment to the memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the La Quinta City Employees Association (LQCEA) regarding salary range adjustments. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Adjustments of salary ranges for classifications represented by the LQCEA will be implemented as outlined in Attachment 1. The specific fiscal impact will be determined as employees move through the range(s). BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: On November 21, 2000 the City Council approved a MOU with the LQCEA. A provision of the MOU required the City to complete a salary and benefits survey for classifications represented by the LQCEA. The survey included salary and benefit data from fifteen (15) cities throughout Riverside County. The City and LQCEA agreed to meet and confer on the results of the survey. The City and LQCEA agreed to salary range adjustments for classifications outlined on Attachment 1. It was agreed that all classifications would be adjusted to the median salary level as delineated in the survey. These adjustments will bring these classifications up to the median salary level. Employees in positions whose range increase by less than 7.5 percent shall remain at their current step in the new range pending their next performance review. Employees who are in job classifications where the range is being adjusted upward by more than 7.5 percent will be placed at the second step on the new salary range that provides an increase over the employee's current salary on the old salary range. Salary adjustments would be retroactive to July 1, 2001. Current Building Inspector employees will continue to receive their auto allowance; however, new employees will not receive an auto allowance, but would be provided access to a vehicle in the City's motor pool. Survey data indicated that classifications listed on Attachment 2 were 116 paid either at the median level or above and would not receive an adjustment. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a resolution of the City Council and an amendment to the MOU with the LQCEA regarding salary range adjustments; or 2. Do not adopt a resolution of the City Council and an amendment to the MOU with the LQCEA regarding salary range adjustments; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Approved for submission by: omas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Classifications receiving salary range adjustments 2. Classifications not receiving salary range adjustments 117 JUN RESOLUTION NO. , A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND THE LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta (City) and the La Quinta City Employees Association (Association) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the period of July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2003; and WHEREAS, the MOU specified that the City would conduct a salary and benefit survey of 15 cities jointly selected by the parties, and upon receiving the results of the survey, the parties would meet and confer in good faith on possible implementation of changes to the City's salary ranges for various classifications of employees represented by the Association; and WHEREAS, the City and the Association have met and conferred in good faith and have reached agreement on changes to salary ranges for certain classifications of employees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. The First Amendment to Memorandum of Understanding (First Amendment), attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by reference is approved, subject to approval by the Association. 2. In all other respects, the MOU remains in full force and effect except as modified by the First Amendment. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 21 st day of August, 2001 by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 118 397/015610-0005 003 210696.01 PM01 !3 v J - 1 /0 / 3%cc, f."'' FIRST AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND THE LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION This FIRST AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (First Amendment) is entered into by and between the City of La Quinta (City) and the La Quinta City Employees Association (Association) as of August 21, 2001 and is made with respect to the following: 1. The City and the Association entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on November 21, 2000 which covers the period of July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2003. 2. Section 2.0 of the MOU called for the parties to conduct a salary and benefit survey of 15 agreed -upon cities and to then meet and confer on the results. The parties have met and conferred and have agreed to certain modifications to the salary ranges attached to various City job classifications. 3. The new list of salary ranges for each job classification which is represented by the Association is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. Employees in positions whose range increase by less than 7.5 percent shall remain at their current step in the new range pending their next performance review. Employees who are in a job classification where the range is being adjusted upward by 7.5 percent or more will be placed at the second step on the new salary range that provides an increase over the employee's current salary on the old salary range. As an example only, an employee currently at Step C, Range 32 whose position is reclassified to Range 37 would be placed at Step B. Salary adjustments will be retroactive to July 1, 2001. The City will use the following methodology to place employees whose range is being increased by 7.5 percent or more in the new ranges: A. Locate the first step in the new salary range which represents a salary increase for the employee over the employee's existing salary at the old range. B. Place the employee at the next highest step after the one that represents where the employee would first receive an increase. 4. Employees currently employed as Senior Building Inspector, Building Inspectors I and II will continue to receive their car allowances as specified in the MOU. If new employees are hired into these positions, they will not receive a car allowance and instead will be provided access to City pooled vehicles. Deputy City Clerk's will be placed at Range 54, Step C effective July 1, 2001. 5. Except as amended by this First Amendment, the MOU remains in full force and effect. CITY OF LA QUINTA 0 LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION LM 397/015610-0005 119 210696.01 PM01 -2- EXHIBIT A CLASSIFICATIONS RECEIVING SALARY RANGE ADJUSTMENTS CLASSIFICATION CURRENT RANGE ADJUSTED RANGE Animal/Code Compliance Officer 1 44 51 Animal Control Officer Il 48 53 Associate Engineer 63 64 Associate Planner 60 62 Building Inspector 1 44 50 Building Inspector II 50 54 Code Compliance Officer 1 44 51 Code Compliance Officer II 48 53 Counter Technician 44 47 Deputy City Clerk 44 54 Executive Secretary 48 53 Facilities Maintenance Technician 42 44 Financial Services Assistant 52 53 Maintenance Foreman 48 53 Maintenance Worker 1 32 37 Maintenance Worker 11 40 41 Secretary 40 43 Senior Building Inspector 56 62 Senior Secretary 1.44 47 1210 g/k'sdoclp/In/salaryrngadjst 004 ATTACHMENT CLASSIFICATIONS RECEIVING SALARY RANGE ADJUSTMENTS CLASSIFICATION CURRENT RANGE ADJUSTED RANGE Animal/Code Compliance Officer I 44 51 Animal Control Officer II 48 63 60 53 Associate Engineer 64 Associate Planner 62 Building Inspector 1 44 50 Building Inspector II 50 54 Code Compliance Officer 1 44 48 44 51 Code Compliance Officer II 53 Counter Technician 47 54 Deputy City Clerk 44 48 42 Executive Secretary 53 Facilities Maintenance Technician 44 53 53 37 41 Financial Services Assistant 52 Maintenance Foreman 48 Maintenance Worker 1 32 Maintenance Worker II 40 tar Secre 40 43 Senior Buildin Inspector 56 62 47 Senior Secretary J44 121. g/k'sdoc/p/In/salaryrngadjst 007 ATTACHMENT 2 CLASSIFICATIONS NOT RECEIVING SALARY RANGE ADJUSTMENTS CLASSIFICATION CURRENT RANGE Account Clerk 40 Account Technician 46 Assistant Engineer 1 53 Assistant Engineer II 58 Office Assistant 36 Recreation Coordinator 38 Recreation Supervisor 52 Senior Center Activities Coordinator 38 Senior Center Office Assistant 32 Senior Center Supervisor 52 122 n� g/k'sdoc/p/In/salaryrngnoadjst COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: August 21, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: -i Adoption of a Resolution Accepting Various Items in Relation to Mariachi Festival 2001 RECOMMENDATION: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council accepting various items in relation to Mariachi Festival 2001 to be held September 1 and 2, 2001. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The City will be participating as a sponsor in this year's Mariachi Festival. The sponsorship is consistent with the adopted City's Marketing Plan (Community Services Marketing, Support Local Events). Funds for the sponsorship amount of $1,500 are available in Account #101-251-605-822. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: KSL Recreation Corporation will be hosting Mariachi Festival 2001 on September 1 and 2, 2001 at PGA West. Some of the activities for the two-day event involve a golf tournament, a reception for the golfers, a buffet dinner, and a Mariachi concert. The City's $1,500 sponsorship will contribute toward the cost of designing and printing the event program, which will have the City seal and an economic development message. Items the City will receive in relation to the Mariachi Festival include a total of: two t-shirts, six tee times for the tournament, seven reception tickets, 17 dinner tickets, 17 concert passes and eight golf round certificates. The golf certificates will be used as drawing prizes for City employees at the Employee Recognition Dinner in December 2001. Accordingly, staff has prepared the attached Resolution to allow acceptance of these items. 123 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council accepting various items in relation to Mariachi Festival 2001 to be held September 1 and 2, 2001; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council accepting various items in relation to Mariachi Festival 2001 to be held September 1 and 2, 2001; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Mari asillas, Ma ment Analyst Approved for submission by: )3/111-1 L Phomas P. Genovese, City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ACCEPTING VARIOUS ITEMS IN RELATION TO MARIACHI FESTIVAL 2001 WHEREAS, KSL Recreation Corporation will be hosting Mariachi Festival 2001 on September 1 and 2, 2001 at PGA West located in the City of La Quinta, California; and, WHEREAS, the City is a sponsor of Mariachi Festival 2001 for purposes of promoting the City of La Quinta and supporting local events; and'. WHEREAS, the City will be receiving various items in relation to Mariachi Festival 2001, including: two t-shirts, six tee times, seven reception tickets, 17 dinner tickets, 17 concert passes and eight golf round certificates; and, WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to accept the Mariachi Festival 2001 items and to direct the City Manager to control distribution of said items. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. The City of the La Quinta hereby accepts the Mariachi Festival 2001 items. 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to control distribution of said festival items. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 21" day of August 2001, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 12!� JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 003 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 126 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE:August 21, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution Granting Conditional Approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map 30168, KSL Land Inc., a Delaware Corporation AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: ly STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map 30168, KSL Land Inc., a Delaware Corporation. None. None. Parcel Map 30168 is located west of Madison Street, north of Avenue 58 and south of Avenue 54 within PGA West, along PGA Boulevard at Jack Nicklaus Drive. (Attachment 1). It consists of two (2) parcels and three (3) lettered parcels containing 2.17 Acres (Attachment 2). The developer has requested the City Council's conditional approval of the Final Map which will allow 30 days for completion of its processing. As of August 10, 2001, City staff has not received approval of the Final Map from the City's Acting Surveyor; however, it is expected that a technically correct map will be submitted within the time allowed with its conditional approval. A Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Attachment 3) has been executed by the developer; however, the associated securities have not been received. As a result, City staff has prepared the attached Resolution which provides for conditional approval of the Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement. The approval is contingent upon receipt, within 30 days (September 20, 2001), of a 127 T:\PWDEPT\C0UNCIL\2001 \010821 j.wpd technically correct Final Map suitable for recording by the County Recorder with all required signatures except for the City Clerk. Once these items are received, the City Clerk will affix the City Seal to the Final Map and offer the Final Map for recording by the County Recorder. If any of the required items are not received by City staff within the specified time frame, the Final Map will be considered disapproved and will be rescheduled for City Council consideration only after all required items have been received. The developer has demonstrated to City staff that sufficient progress has been made with the documents required for conditional final map approval. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map 30168, KSL Land Inc., a Delaware Corporation; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map 301681 KSL Land Inc., a Delaware Corporation; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respegtfully submitted, �I- C hris A. Vc Public Wor Attachments: irector/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 1 . Vicinity Map 2. Tract Map 3. Subdivision Improvement Agreement 128 TAPWDEPT\COUNCIL\2001 \010821 j.wpd RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING CONDITIONAL FINAL MAP APPROVAL OF Parcel Map 30168, AND AUTHORIZING A TIME EXTENSION FOR SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO VALIDATE THE APPROVAL WHEREAS, the City Council conducts only two regular meetings per month and the time interval between these meetings occasionally creates an undue hardship for business enterprises and individuals seeking approval of subdivision maps, and WHEREAS, the City Council as a matter of policy allows a subdivider to have city staff present the map for approval consideration when the requisite items necessary for final map approval are nearly, but not completely, finished thus yielding to the subdivider additional production time for preparation of those items, and WHEREAS, the subdivider has demonstrated to city staff and the City Council that it has made sufficient progress with items required for final map approval, and it is reasonable to expect the subdivider to satisfactorily complete the items, including city staff review time, within thirty (30) days without adversely impacting other ongoing work commitments of city staff, and WHEREAS, Section 66458(b) of the Subdivision Map Act grants the City Council broad authority to authorize time extensions regarding final map approval, or disapproval, upon receiving it for consideration, and WHEREAS, the City Council relies on professional city staff to review all required items for conformance with relevant requirements, and it is therefore appropriate for the City Council to approve the final map subject to review and confirmation of the required items by professional city staff, within a reasonable period of time as specified by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: Section 1. The final map for Parcel Map 30168, is conditionally approved provided the subdivider submits all required items on or before September 20, 2001. 129 UO3 Resolution No. 2001- Parcel Map 30168 Adopted: August 21, 2001 Page 2 Section 2. The City Council's approval of the final map shall not be considered valid until the City Engineer has signed the map indicating that it conforms with the tentative map, the Subdivision Map Act and all ordinances of the City. Section 3. The City Engineer shall withhold his signature from the map until the subdivider has completed the following requirements to the City Engineer's satisfaction. A. Produced a technically correct drawing of the map area that is suitable for recording by the County Recorder B. Has obtained all requisite signatures on the map title page, except for the City Clerk's signature. Section 4. The City Clerk shall withhold affixing the City Seal to the map title page, along with her attesting signature, until the City Engineer has signed the map. Section 5. The time extension for satisfying the requirements of the conditional approval for this final map shall expire when City offices close for regular business on September 20, 2001. If the subdivider has not satisfied the requirements in Section 3, herein, by the expiration deadline, the final map shall be considered disapproved. Disapproval does not deny any rights the subdivider may have under the Map Act to resubmit the final map for approval, or disapproval. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 21 st day of August, 2001, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Council Members NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 130 Vd� Resolution No. 2001- Parcel Map 30168 Adopted: August 21, 2001 Page 3 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON , City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 131 'os ATTACHMENT 1 52nd JAVENUE m � N 53rd AVENUE 0 z Ni 54th AVENUE z � c� o m PGA WEST n o o m v z m m PROJECT AIRPORT BLVD. —' SITE . Z'---- WEISKOPF 58th AVENUE VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE ua7 ATTACHMENT 2 rc Pit Niln 1111177777y� Tl Ag 30 �� S K K �1 H •� 4 912 �yi s i+�n N 4p �JQ mq lit 1 011,11 1 AP A- i psi gxAlm A r 'BIZ V :,X-01 qq�Ili i� SR1. gel 44-0 All 111 1 A Jill ,1> 0W IWO pill Q '•� 01 Km m t INg: E 32, 1 14. R Ar p � lit 9- 1 1 I� lit! CA if � _ * �,► C4 �p �� O N s�� Kigui 9a Big lqalo I H M oil 141- 1 16il Jog y I 9 i QyI t axv $4 13.3 I JIM gig / r 1000, --------------- litarE NE 9.qp `�\ b nrw AGO.lLr- CO it n W I w;1 00• bpr 2s0 1 / r J / \ c ,,--'I/ co 1, r� N 00'00'11 W131.23' It ♦ W N^ o V e V P Y� W N^ O V e V P U� W N^ e �Od V O W♦ YG NYIY O{ U{��{ Y{�� e�yy �NYI eyy4W411 U Y�^�iIPPV�awl V V U�yy O V eUN V � ♦ G NP W YY W YNVt1 U%O � yya� 2IWu y1 JNy Vyp� RP fJ+O V 1U W Oyy 01 aN1U 0 0 IJa+ OYI V OY W w� V W NN O 11 W V NOON pY ' V o W riii �Vy � YIUUIMP.��^, �Uyy10 Vv V Yam pa p�Ga oUC^�py,ep��y P{� 0 U U oe OO O O e000ee0000000ae ee O e P Ol Y uiuNPP e e U U P U U GNYI o e O 6 6 eee0000 PNP Y e Ol e U e A m ♦ uu P V ♦♦p� pP W��yyVP^.p VPP. WiON Vr to Y 3 ��U P Y V O P ONNOPmNm N{� W O ryWry W N y Y u V V ONO. .00 VV O.PONY V m V W V 1 W 0p W V Y O W W N O Ovv O V e W W O IY Y P^ Yp Pryry V ey Pry N W W y Y N p 0 Y ppV O+ yye y^. M T W Y N V V p GIB W J y ry P W 7 pp+ W 134 ATTACHMENT 3 CITY OF LA QUINTA SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT Parcel Map 30168 THIS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this day of , 2001, by and between KSL Land Inc., a Delaware Corporation hereinafter referred to as "Subdivider," and the City of La Quinta, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City." RECITALS: A. Subdivider has prepared and filed a final map or parcel map (the "Map") of a unit of land in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, which unit of land is known as Parcel Map No. 30168 (the "Parcel Map") pursuant to the provisions of Section 66410, et sec. of the California Government Code (the "Subdivision Map Act"). B. Prior to approval of the Map, Subdivider is required to install or agree to install certain public and private improvements (the "Improvements"). C. The Improvements have not been installed and accepted at this time. D. It is therefore necessary that Subdivider and City enter into an agreement for the installation of the Improvements as provided in Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Improvement Plans. Prior to submittal of the Map for approval by the City Council, Subdivider shall furnish original improvement plans meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. 2. Improvements. Subdivider shall construct the public and private street, drainage, utility, landscaping, and other improvements required to be constructed or agreed to be constructed under this Agreement as listed in Exhibit "A" , and shall bear the full cost thereof. The methods, standards, specifications, sequence, and scheduling of construction shall be as approved by the City Engineer. 3. Improvement Security. A. One class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "performance security," shall assure the faithful performance of this Agreement including construction of the Improvements, payment of Subdivider's fair share of Improvements which have been or will be constructed by others ("Participatory Improvements"), and payment of plan check and permit fees. A second class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "payment security," shall assure the payment of the cost of labor, equipment and materials supplied to construct the Improvements. A third class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "warranty security," shall serve as a guarantee and warranty of the Improvements for a period of one year following the completion and acceptance of the Improvements. Subdivider shall furnish performance and payment security prior to and as a condition of City Council approval of the Map. Subdivider shall provide warranty security after Improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council and prior to or concurrently with the final release of performance security. Warranty security shall not be required for Monumentation or Participatory Improvements. However, the City may utilize Monumentation Security for performance of or payment for the work in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. As part of the obligation secured by each of the performance security, payment security and warranty security, and in addition to the face amount of each such security, each such security shall include and assure the payment of costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing the obligations thereby secured. B. Improvement security shall conform with Section 66499 of the California Government Code and one or more of the following: 135 1) A cash deposit with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company, at City's option. T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEY\TRACTS\30168\S I Agreement.wpd Page 1(of10 2) Surety bonds, of the form specified in subsection 66499.2 of the California Government Code, issued by a surety or sureties listed in the U.S. Department of Treasury Circular 570 (latest version). 3) Certificates of deposit, in City's name, from one or more financial institutions subject to regulation by the state or federal government and having a financial quality rating of "A" or better and a commitment reliability rating of "R-2" or better on the Investment Data Exchange (of the Los Angeles County Treasurer's office). 4) Irrevocable letters of credit, issued by one or more financial institutions meeting the requirements of Paragraph (3), pledging that the funds necessary to carry out the completion of the Improvements are on deposit, guaranteed for payment, and constitute a trust fund which is not subject to levy or attachment by any creditor of the depositor until released by City. Letters of credit shall guarantee that all or any portion of the funds available pursuant to the letters of credit will be paid upon the written demand of City and that such written demand need not present documentation of any type as a condition of payment, including proof of loss. The duration of any such letter of credit shall be for a period of not less than one year from the execution of the agreement with which it is provided and shall state, on its face, that the letter of credit will be automatically renewed until such time that City authorizes its expiration or until sixty (60) days after City receives notice from the financial institution of intent to allow expiration of the letter of credit. 5) A lien upon the subdivided property, if City finds that it would not be in the public interest to require the installation of the Improvements sooner than two (2) years after recordation of the final map or parcel map for which the Improvements are required. The lien shall provide a collateral value of three (3) times the estimated cost of the Improvements and shall include the power of sale of the real property, all buildings and improvements thereon, or that may. be erected upon or made thereto, together with all hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in any wise appertaining, and the reservations, remainders, rents, issues, and profits thereof. The collateral value of the property shall be established at Subdivider's expense through an appraisal approved by City. 6) An instrument of credit from an agency of the state, federal or local government, when any agency of the state, federal, or local government provides at least Twenty Percent (20%) of the financing for the Improvements. 7) When Subdivider is a non-profit organization, security may be negotiable bonds, of the kind approved for securing deposits of public moneys with City or in favor of City, as specified in Section 16430 of the California Government Code, deposited, at City's option, with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company. C. All securities shall be furnished in accordance with the provisions of Exhibit A. The amount of the performance security shall equal One Hundred Percent (100%) of the estimated cost of constructing the Improvements, including payment of plan check and permit fees, as estimated by the City Engineer or a duly authorized representative of the City Engineer. The amount of Payment security shall equal the amount of the amount of performance security, except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A, and shall be furnished as a separate security. Warranty security shall equal Ten Percent (10%) of the amount of performance security except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A. D. At the time of submittal of security, Subdivider shall pay to City administrative fees applicable to the form of security provided. Administrative fees shall apply to the subdivision (final map, parcel map or waiver of parcel map) rather than to individual security instruments. The fees shall be paid separately for each different form and/or source (surety or financial institution) of security initially submitted and for substitution of securities but shall not be required for submittal of warranty security if the warranty security is of the same form and from the same source as the performance security it replaces. Administrative fees for security shall be as follows: 1) For certificates of deposit, bonds and letters of credit as described in Paragraphs 2), 3) and 4) of SECTION 3.B., which require the establishment of evidence of the reliability of the surety or financial institution, the administrative fee shall be One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00). 2) For liens on real property as described in Paragraph 5) of SECTION 3.B., for which City will prepare lien agreements and subordination agreements, administer valuation of the real property and administer the agreements over the life of the lien, all of which require legal assistance and financial advice, Subdivider shall pay to City an administration fee of One Half of One Percent (0.5%) of the estimated cost of the improvements secured but not less than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) nor more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00). 136 T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEY\TRACTS\30168\S I Agreement.wpd Page 2 of 6 011. 3) For other forms of security listed in Section 3 B, above, there will be no administrative fee. E. Participatory Improvements, if any, are identified in Exhibit A. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place until the Participatory Improvements are constructed and actual costs are known and paid by Subdivider, or until Subdivider pays to City the estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements, and shall guarantee the reimbursement by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost of the Participatory Improvements. Payment security and warranty security shall not be required for Participatory Improvements. Upon written demand from City, Subdivider shall deposit cash with City in lieu of or in replacement of security guaranteeing Participatory Improvements. If Subdivider fails to deposit said cash within 30 days of the date of the written demand from City, City may present a written demand to Subdivider's Surety for payment of said cash and Subdivider's Surety shall pay to City the lesser of: 1) the amount demanded, or 2) the amount of the security. F. Security shall not expire, be reduced or become wholly or partially invalid for any reason, including non-payment of premiums, modifications of this Agreement and/or expiration of the time for performance stated in this Agreement, without express authorization from City unless the surety provides City with sixty (60) days written notice by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. G. Security shall be released in the following manner: 1) Performance security shall be released upon the final completion and acceptance or approval, by the City Council of the Improvements subject to the provisions of paragraph B. 2) The City Engineer may authorize partial reduction of performance security as work progresses, upon application by Subdivider. However, no such reduction shall be for an amount less than Ten Percent (10%) of the total performance security provided for the faithful performance of the act or work. In no event shall security be reduced below that required to guarantee the completion of the act or work or obligation secured, plus Ten Percent (10%). The City Engineer shall not allow more than two partial reductions of security furnished for any improvement agreement. 3) Participatory Improvement security shall be released upon payment by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost or estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements. 4) If City receives no notice of recorded claims of lien, labor and materials security shall be released in full 90 days after final acceptance and/or approval by the City Council, of the Improvements. If City receives notice of any recorded lien, the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act shall apply. 5) Warranty security not utilized during the warranty period shall be released one year after final acceptance or approval by the City Council of all Tract Improvements. However, if at the end of the one-year warranty period, there are one or more outstanding requests by City for performance of work or provision of materials under the terms of the warranty, warranty security shall be retained until the outstanding requests are satisfied or until Subdivider has made other arrangements satisfactory to the City Engineer. 4. Permits Required. Prior to commencing any phase of work, Subdivider shall obtain all permits required for that phase of work and pay all required fees. Work performed under a permit or permits shall comply with all provisions of the required permits. 5. Off -site Improvements. When the construction of one or more of the Improvements requires or necessitates the acquisition of real property not owned by Subdivider or City, Subdivider shall use its best efforts purchase such real property at a reasonable price. In the event that Subdivider is unsuccessful, despite its best efforts, to acquire such real property at a reasonable price, Subdivider may request in writing that City attempt to acquire such real property. City may, but is not required to, agree to attempt to acquire such real property on behalf of Subdivider. If City so agrees, City and Subdivider shall enter a separate written agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Said separate agreement shall provide that Subdivider advance to City One Hundred Fifty Percent (150%) of the appraised fair market value of the real property. Any unexpended portion of said advance shall be refunded to Subdivider. Any additional funds required for acquisition of the real property shall be paid by Subdivider to City upon the conveyance of said real property to Subdivider. In no event shall the failure of Subdivider or City to acquire such real property excuse, waive, or otherwise terminate Subdivider's obligation to construct the applicable improvement pursuant to this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval. 7 13 T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEY\TRACTS\30168\S I Agreement.wpd Page 3 of 6 6. Completion of Improvements. Subdivider shall begin construction of the Improvements within ninety (90) days and shall complete construction within twelve (12) months after the approval of this Agreement. Portions of the Improvements may be completed at a later date, as determined by the City Engineer or as set forth in Exhibit A. Failure by Subdivider to begin or complete construction of the Improvements within the specified time periods shall constitute cause for City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare Subdivider in default of this agreement, to revise improvement security requirements as necessary to ensure completion of the improvements, and/or to require modifications in the standards or sequencing of the Improvements in response to changes in standards or conditions affecting or affected by the Improvements. Said failure shall not otherwise affect the validity of this agreement or Subdivider's obligations hereunder. 7. Force Majeure. In the event that Subdivider is unable to perform within the time limits herein due to strikes, act of God, or other events beyond Subdivider's control, the time limits for obligations affected by such events will be extended by the period of such events. 8. Time Extension. Subdivider may make application in writing to the City Council for an extension of time for completion of the Improvements. The City Council, in its sole and absolute discretion, may approve or deny the request or conditionally approve the extension with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. As a condition of the time extension, Subdivider shall furnish securities, similar in form and substance to those required in SECTION 3 hereinabove, to cover the period of extension. The value of the securities shall be sufficient to ensure the performance of and payment for Improvements that remain incomplete at the time of the extension, and to provide warranty security on completed Improvements. 9. Survey Monuments. Before final approval of street improvements, Subdivider shall place survey monuments in accordance with the provisions of Sections 66495, et sec. of the Subdivision Map Act and of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Subdivider shall provide the City Engineer written proof that the monuments have been set, evidence of payment and receipt thereof by the engineer or surveyor setting the monuments, and intersection monument tie -outs for monuments set in public streets. 10. Final Acceptance of Improvements. At the completion of construction and prior to acceptance of the Improvements by City, Subdivider shall submit a request for final approval by City. The request shall be accompanied by any required certifications from Subdivider's engineers or surveyors, approval letters from other agencies having jurisdiction over and approval authority for improvements required by this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval, and any required construction quality documentation not previously submitted. Upon receipt of said request, the City Engineer or a duly -authorized representative will review the required documentation and will inspect the Improvements. If the Improvements are determined to be in accordance with applicable City standards and specifications, and as provided herein, obligations required by the Conditions of Approval and this Agreement have been satisfied, and Subdivider has provided revised plans as required in Paragraph 11, hereinafter, the City Engineer shall recommend acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council. 11. Revisions to Plans. When the Improvements have been inspected and approved by the City Engineer, Subdivider shall make any necessary revisions to the original plans held by City so the plans depict the actual Improvements constructed. When necessary revisions have been made, each separate sheet of the plans shall be clearly marked with the words "As -Built," "As -Constructed," or "Record Drawing," the marking shall be stamped by an engineer or surveyor, as appropriate for the improvements thereon, who is licensed to practice in California, and the plans shall be resubmitted to the City Engineer. 12. Improvement Warranty. Subdivider hereby guarantees the Improvements to City for a period of one (1) year, beginning on the date of final acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council, against any defective work or labor done, or defective materials furnished, and shall repair or replace such defective work or materials. 13. Release of Security. City shall retain and release securities in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of this agreement. Prior to the release of payment security, the City Engineer may require Subdivider to provide a title report or other evidence sufficient to show claims of lien, if any, that may affect the amount of payment security released. 14. City Right to Cure. If Subdivider fails to perform any obligation hereunder and such obligation has not been performed within sixty (60) days after written notice of default from City, then City may perform the obligation, 138 T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEY\TRACTS\30168\S I Agreement.wpd Page 4 of 6 and Subdivider shall pay the entire cost of such performance by City including costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing such obligation. In cases of emergency or compelling public interest, as determined by the City Engineer, the requirement for written notice of default and/or the passage of sixty (60) days shall be deemed waived and all other provisions of this Article shall remain in effect. 15. Indemnification. Subdivider hereby binds itself, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, executors, administrators, guarantors, heirs, and assigns, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold City and its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and assigns harmless from and against any losses, claims, demands, actions, or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, arising out of or in any way connected with Subdivider's performance herein under, including costs of suit and reasonable attorneys' fees. 16. No Modification of Conditions. This Agreement shall in no respect act to modify or amend any provision of the Conditions of Approval. In the event that any requirement or condition of this Agreement is inconsistent with or fails to include one or more provisions of the Conditions of Approval, which document(s) is (are) incorporated herein by reference, the provisions in the Conditions of Approval shall remain in effect and shall control. 17. Severability. In the event that any provision or provisions of this Agreement are held unenforceable, all provisions not so held shall remain in full force and effect. 18. General Provisions A. All notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the parties at their respective addresses indicated hereon. Notices personally delivered shall be effective upon delivery. Notices mailed as provided herein and sent postage prepaid shall be effective upon the date of delivery or refusal indicated on the return receipt. Either party may change its address for notices hereunder by notice to the other given in the manner provided in this subparagraph. B. The terms, conditions, covenants, and agreements set forth herein shall apply to and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors of the parties hereto. C. Neither party to this Agreement relies upon any warranty or representation not contained in this Agreement. D. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted with respect to the laws of the State of California. E. In the event of any dispute between the parties with respect to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to prompt payment of its reasonable attorneys' fees from the non -prevailing party. F. Any failure or delay by either party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any such rights or remedies provided for hereunder. 139 T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEY\TRACTS\30168\S I Agreement.wpd Page 5 of 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. CITY: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk SUBDIVIDER: By: Title: By: Title: t Reviewed and Approved: City Engineer Approved as to Form: City Attorney Date Date Date City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 760/777-7075 KSL Land Inc., a Delaware Corporation 55-920 PGA Blvd. La Quinta, CA 92253 (760)564-7166 Date Date 140 T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\LINDSEY\TRACTS\30168\S I Agreement.wpd Page 6 of 6 Exhibit A Security - Parcel Map 30168 Except as otherwise provided herein, Subdivider shall furnish performance security and labor & materials security prior to agendization of the Map for approval by the City Council. Improvements designated as "Participatory" have been or will be constructed by others. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place indefinitely until called upon or released by City. Monumentation security shall guarantee performance of or payment for the work and shall be utilized or released as specified in Chapter 4, Article 9 of the Subdivision Map Act. The "Engineering & Plans" security will be released when the City has possession of complete, approved, original plans, signed and sealed by a design professional(s), for all required improvements. The "No -Plan Contingency", which may be utilized for any listed item or for other cost found necessary in the design or construction of the required improvements, may be released in whole or part by the City Engineer, at any time after construction plans are complete and the scope and nature of improvements are fully known. These releases shall be separate from and in addition to the reductions discussed below. As elements of the work are completed, Subdivider may request a maximum of two partial releases of performance security. Partial releases shall be for not less than ten percent (10%) of the total performance security for the tract and shall not reduce total performance security below the amount necessary to complete the Improvements plus ten percent (10%) of the original amount. Partial releases of performance security will be evaluated and may be granted, in whole or in part, by the City Engineer. Requests for partial releases, setting forth in detail the amount of work completed and the value thereof, shall be made in writing to the City Engineer. Labor & materials security shall remain in place until 90 days after all required tract improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council. Improvement Description Performance Labor & Materials Monumentation 2,600 Construction Subtotal: $2,600 Contingency 25 % 650 Total: $3,250 C�7 1l' s / T a"`�•C 44 Inciu'rtn``4�� 7 OF9 AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Approval of a Contract Change Order to Allow a Temporary Reconfiguration of Irrigation Lines to Accommodate the Ultimate Widening of Jefferson Street at Avenue 49, Jefferson Street Improvements Phase I - Avenue 54 to Highway 1 1 1, Project No. 99-05 BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: AV STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve a contract change order in an amount not to exceed $50,000 to compensate the contractor for the temporary reconfiguration of irrigation lines to accommodate the ultimate widening of Jefferson Street at Avenue 49, Jefferson Street Improvements Phase I - Avenue 54 to Highway 1 1 1, Project No. 99-05. The following represents the project budget and funding sources: SIB 300 (401-000-493-485) $713,41 1 Infrastructure Funds (401-000-493-000) $2,882,008 CVAG Funding (401-000-466-481) $12,589,513 TOTAL FUNDING: $16,184,932 The following summarizes costs for construction support: Project Design: $1,235,338 Construction Management: $444,494 Materials Testing/Field Survey: $141,635 Right of Way Acquisition: $1,557,863 Administration: $668,010 Total $4,047,340 142 T:\PWDEPT\C0UNCIL\2001 \010821 I.wpd The following represents a summary of the project construction budget: Base Construction Contract Amount: $6,866,566 Contract Change Order Nos. 1-42: $1,034,069 Contract Change Order No. 43: $50,000 Revised Contract Total: $7,950,635 As illustrated, Contract Change Order 43 increases the Jefferson Street Phase I construction budget by $50,000. Adequate funding is available to support staff's recommendation. None. The project was bid and is being constructed utilizing prevailing wages. On June 29, 1999, the City Council awarded a contract to construct Phase I of the Jefferson Street Improvement project to Granite Construction Company in the amount of $6,866,566.00. The contract provides for 300 consecutive calendar days in which to perform all tasks listed within the bid documents. On June 5, 2001, the City Council approved Contract Change Order No. 31 to eliminate the re -construction of the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) pump station located at Avenue 49 from the Jefferson Street Phase I construction contract. Specifically, CCO 31 omitted Items 89 - Concrete Work; 90 - Pump and Motors; 91 - Piping, Valves and Supports; 92 - Painting; 93 - Electrical Service/Motor Control Center; 94 - Other Electrical Lighting; and 95 - Site Work, Walls and Gates from Granite's construction contract. With the approval of the revised pump station plans pending, the Contractor informed the City that the pump station materials had a minimum 10 week lead time. In January 2001, the pump station drawings were approved by CVWD. In March 2001, the designer provided the City with an engineer's estimate for the work proposed within the CVWD approved plan revision in the amount of $414,879. Considering the estimated costs of the revisions, the long lead time for material deliveries, the delays to roadway construction, and the potential for extended overhead costs claimed by the Contractor, it was determined that deleting the contract items of work from the existing construction contract was in the best interest of the Project. It was intended that the revised pump station be bid and constructed as a stand alone project after Jefferson Street Phase I is complete. 143 002 TAPWDEPT\C0UNCIL\2001\010821 I.wpd However, in order to complete the Jefferson Street widening adjacent to the CVWD L3 pump station, it is necessary construct a temporary tie-in of the existing irrigation lines. The estimated cost for a temporary tie-in of the new irrigation system to the existing pump station will be $50,000. Contract Change Order No. 43 (Attachment 1) will compensate the contractor for the temporary reconfiguration of irrigation lines to accommodate the ultimate widening of Jefferson Street at Avenue 49. The temporary reconfiguration of the irrigation lines will allow irrigation service to continue until the new L3 pump station is bid and constructed under separate contract. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve a contract change order in an amount not to exceed $50,000 to compensate the contractor for the temporary reconfiguration of irrigation lines to accommodate the ultimate widening of Jefferson Street at Avenue 49, Jefferson Street Improvements Phase I - Avenue 54 to Highway 1 1 1, Project No. 99-05; or 2. Do not approve a contract change order in an amount not to exceed $50,000 to compensate the contractor for the temporary reconfiguration of irrigation lines to accommodate the ultimate widening of Jefferson Street at Avenue 49, Jefferson Street Improvements Phase I - Avenue 54 to Highway 1 1 1, Project No. 99-05; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, ,*?\ -M - 6 10--r-0 fc42. is A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Contract Change Order No. 43 144 003 T:\PWDEPT\C0UNCIL\2001 \010821 I.wpd ATTACHMENT 1 V >- I- TM. GF� OF �ti CONTRACT: JEFFERSON STREET IMPROVEMENTS HIGHWAY 111 TO AVENUE 54 CONTRACTOR: Granite Construction Company 38-000 Monroe Street Indio, California 92203 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.43 Sheet 1 of 2 PROJECT NO.99-05 Pursuant to the terns of the original Contract Agreement, you are hereby directed to make the herein described changes or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications ations for this Contract. Unless otherwise stated all work shall conform to the terms, general conditions, and special provisions of the original Contract. Note: This Change Order is not effective until approved by the Engineer. Below is the description of the work to be done, estimate of quantities, and prices to be paid. The work is segregated between additional work at contract price, agreed prig, and force account. Unless otherwise stated, rates for rental equipment if for that which is actually used and no allowance will be made for idle time. Change requested by: The last percentage shown for work at contract price is the net accumulated increase or decrease from the original quantity in the Engineer's estimate. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: Provide labor, equipment, and materials required and used for the extra work to connect the existing L-3 Pump Station as shown on Bid Plan Sheet 93 to the irrigation improvements as shown on Revised Plan Sheets 103,104A and 104B of 104E. The extra work of this Contact Change Order No. 43 is as follows: • As determined necessary by the Engineer, remove and dispose of asphalt concrete adjacent to the Jefferson Street intersection with Avenue 49. • Install 12-inch Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP) from lateral I I8.0-1.2LT, sta. 3+33.39 to the Pump No. 4 location shown on Bid Plan. Sheet 93. Install 3 CFS, 200 Amp pump at the Pump No. 4 location as specified and as provided by the Coachella Valley Water District. • Install 12-inch DIP from lateral 118.0-1.2AH, sta. 10+43.77 to Pump No. 2 as shown on Bid Plan Sheet 93. • Where determined necessary, install chain link fence along the perimeter of the remaining L-3 Pump Station. • Reconstruct asphalt concrete in accordance with Section 203 `BMJNIINOUS MATERIALS' of the Technical Specifications. 14 5 005 C:%JEFFER-IICONTRA-I%CCO#43-2%CCO43.WPD Sheet 2 of 2 CONTRACT: JEFFERSON STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO.99-05 HIGHWAY 111 TO AVENUE 54 CONTRACTOR: Granite Construction Company 38-000 Monroe Street Indio, California 92203 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.43 For this extra work to complete the tie-in connection of the irrigation improvements with the existing L-3 Pump Station, the increase in Contract Price is as follows: EXTRA WORK AT FORCE ACCOUNT ffHAa FA) For this work, and in accordance with Section 8.3 `Force Account Payment' of the Contract General Conditions, the Contractor shall be paid a sum not to exceed $50,000.00. This sum constitutes full compensation, including all applicable markups, for this work. TOTAL COMPENSATION FOR THIS CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER SHALL NOT EXCEED: $ 509,000.00 Previous Contract Amt. Through Change Order No. t2 - $ 799009723.89 Add/(Deduct) this Change Order $ 50,000.00 Revised Contract Total $ 7,950,723.89 By reason of this contract change order the time of completion is adjustcd as follows: Deferred Time Adjustment. Submitted By: Date: Approved By; (City of Indio) Date: Approved By: (City of L.Q.) Date: We, the undersigned Contractor, halve given cxxfitl consMaudon to Ike change proposed and hereby drW if this proposal is approved that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, perform all labor, except as may be noted above, and per all services necessary to complete the above specified work, and hereby accept as full payment the amount shown above, which includes direct and indirect overhead expenses for any delays. Accepted By: Contractor: Granite Construction Company Title: Date: C: UEFFER-11COtiniA -1 ICCON43-MC043. W PD 14 6 006 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution Approving Application for Grant Funds for the Roberti Z'Berg-Harris Urban Space and Recreation Block Grant Program Under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 17 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a resolution of the City Council approving the City's application for grant funds for the Roberti Z'Berg-Harris Urban Space and Recreation Block Grant Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 (Proposition 12). FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Adoption of this resolution will allow the City to enter into a contract with the California Department of Parks and Recreation for its share of Proposition 12 Roberti Z'Berg-Harris Block Grant funds. The City is eligible to receive $56,486; the State requires a 30% match of $24,208, calculated by the State as 3/7 x $56,486. The match can be funded by the Quimby Account. The combined total of grant funds plus matching funds is $80,694. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None for this action. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Last year, California voters passed Proposition 12, The Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. The bond act consists of several programs that respond to the recreational and open -space needs of California's growing population. The Robert Z'Berg-Harris Block Grant Program allocates $200,000,000 in bond funds for cities and park districts to undertake projects that satisfy the most urgent parks and recreation needs in urban areas. The allocations are calculated by the State based on population. The City of La Quinta is eligible to receive $56,486, with a required match of $24,208. Funds may be used for the acquisition, development, improvement, or 147 rehabilitation of local parks and recreational lands and/or facilities. Funds may also be used to create innovative recreation programs for special populations (e.g. senior citizens, disabled, single parents, etc.). Projects must be completed by March 2009. Approval of the attached resolution is the first step in the process to obtain these funds. At this point, the City does not have to identify a specific project. Once the California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) receives the City's authorizing resolution, they will process a contract and send it to the City to be executed. This contract, when fully executed by the City and State, triggers the appropriation of State funds. The City then chooses a project, completes a project application (including CEQA compliance documentation), and submits the application to the DPR. When the project application is approved by the DPR, the City may commence with its project and request an advance of up to 80% of grant funds. Once the project is completed, the DPR conducts a site inspection and releases the remaining funds to the City. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a resolution of the City Council approving the City's application for grant funds for the Roberti Z'Berg-Harris Urban Space and Recreation Block Grant Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 (Proposition 12); or 2. Do not adopt a resolution of the City Council approving the City's application for grant funds for the Roberti Z'Berg-Harris Urban Space and Recreation Block Grant Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 (Proposition 12); or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respe9tfully1submitted, Dodie Horvitz, JKrector of Community Services Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager �` 0 RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICANT TO APPLY FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE PER CAPITA GRANT PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 WHEREAS, the Legislature and Governor of the State of California have approved a grant for the above Program; and WHEREAS, the California Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the grant program, setting up necessary procedures; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Department of Parks and Recreation require the governing body to certify by resolution the approval of the Grantee to apply for the Per Capita Allocation; and WHEREAS, the Grantee will enter into a contract with the State of California for subject Project(s); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ' OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA: 1. Approves the filing for local assistance funds from the Per Capita Grant Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000; and 2. Certifies that Grantee has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the Project(s); and 3. Certifies the Grantee has reviewed, understands and agrees to the General Provisions contained in the Contract shown in the Procedural Guide; and 4. Appoints the City Manager as agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including, but not limited to, Applications, agreements, payment requests, and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the Project(s). PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21 St day of August, 2001, by the following vote: 14.9 CO AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 150 CO COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 Adoption of a Resolution Approving Application for Grant Funds for the Per Capita Grant Program Under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a resolution of the City Council approving the City's application for grant funds for the Per Capita Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 (Proposition 12). FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Adoption of this resolution will allow the City to enter into a contract with the California Department of Parks and Recreation for its share of Proposition 12 Per Capita Program funds. The City is eligible to receive $176,000, and there are no matching funds required for this program. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None for this action. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Last year, California voters passed Proposition 12, The Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. The bond act consists of several programs that respond to the recreational and open -space needs of California's growing population. The Per Capita Program allocates $338,000,000 in bond funds for park and playground capital improvements statewide: 60% to be distributed to cities and special districts, and 40% to be distributed to counties, regional park districts, and open -space districts. The allocations are calculated by the State based on population. The City of La Quinta is eligible to receive $176,000. Funds may be used for the acquisition, development, improvement, rehabilitation, restoration, or enhancement of local parks and recreational lands and/or facilities. The goals of the program include: rehabilitate local parks to improve efficiency and reduce operating costs, develop facilities that promote positive alternatives for youth, promote cooperation between 151 local recreational service providers and youth -serving organizations, promote family - oriented recreation, and to provide safe, accessible local park lands and facilities. Projects must be completed by March 2008. Approval of the attached resolution is the first step in the process to obtain these funds. At this point, the City does not have to identify a specific project. Once the California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) receives the City's authorizing resolution, they will process a contract and send it to the City to be executed. This contract, when fully executed by the City and State, triggers the appropriation of State funds. The City then chooses a project, completes a project application (including CEQA compliance documentation), and submits the application to the DPR. When the project application is approved by the DPR, the City may commence with its project and request an advance of up to 80% of grant funds. Once the project is completed, the DPR conducts a site inspection and releases the remaining funds to the City. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a resolution of the City Council approving the City's application for grant funds for the Per Capita Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 (Proposition 12); or 2. Do not adopt a resolution of the City Council approving the City's application for grant funds for the Per Capita Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 (Proposition 12); or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully sybmitted, Dodie Horvitz, .Co)pnunity Services Director Approved for submission by: rXX Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICANT TO APPLY FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ROBERTI-Z'BERG -HARRIS URBAN OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 WHEREAS, the Legislature and Governor of the State of California have approved a grant for the above Program; and WHEREAS, the California Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the grant program, setting up necessary procedures; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Department of Parks and Recreation require the governing body to certify by resolution the approval of the Grantee to apply for the Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris allocation; and WHEREAS, the Grantee will enter into a contract with the State of California for subject Project(s); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA: 1. Approves the filing for local assistance funds from the Roberti-Z'Berg- Harris Urban Space and Recreation Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000; and 2. Certifies that Grantee has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the Project(s); and 3. Certifies the Grantee has reviewed, understands and agrees to the General Provisions contained in the Contract shown in the Procedural Guide; and 4. Certifies that Grantee has or will have available, prior to commencement of any work on the Project(s) included in the Application, the required Match; and 5. Certifies that the Project(s) included in this Application conform to the recreation element of any applicable city or county general plan; and 6. Appoints the City Manager as agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including, but not limited to, Applications, agreements, payment requests, and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the Project(s). PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21 s` day of August, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KA I HLHINL JLNSUN, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 154 605 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 Approval of Use of the La Quinta Museum by the La Quinta Historical Society for a Membership Reception RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: —Z_q STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve the use of the La Quinta Museum by the La Quinta Historical Society for a Membership Reception on October 21, 2001. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The La Quinta Historical Society is requesting the use of the La Quinta Museum for a Membership Reception to be held on October 21, 2001 from 4:00-6:00 p.m, as provided in Attachment 1. As a part of the reception, members will be invited to bring a bottle of their favorite wine to share with other members. No food or drinks will be sold at this event. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve the use of the La Quina Museum by the La Quinta Historical Society for a Membership Reception on October 21, 2001; or 2. Do not approve the use of the La Quina Museum by the La Quinta Historical Society for a Membership Reception on October 21, 2001; or 155 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. ResaectfuWy submitted, Dodie Horvitz, %ommunity Services Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Request from the La Quinta Historical Society for Use of the La Quinta Museum 156 002 S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.151.Musuem Use for Reception.wpd ATTACHMENT 157 003 ATTACHMENT 1 LA QUINTA HISTORICAL IWIM I? o. I3nx 1283 La Quicta; CA 92253 (760Sb4-1283 President Barhara lm-in Executive Vice 12sve.i d oe t1Sce retary Judy Vo`sier vice President Don Arends Treasurer )"mi: Kirkpatrick Docent Director I.CKLISC. Ncoley Membership bireetor Jaclucline; Wright nir�cturs Hance AtkiI'm Martc. Clevelwid No Cross JoAnne Hilei John H tics Reverie Monle.twncry Shell' Morris C'twryl Schuler Atchic Sharp Inge Vordarwinkfcr Honorary Director% Larry Allen Alicc 13milcs Bell Kris Capra Tom Capra Ned Millis Fred Rice N,.,� h N' MUSEUM 77-3115 Avenida Moiitcytlnla I,.a Quinw. California 922S3 August 8, 2001 Roche Horvitz, Director Comm-un-ity Services Department City of La Quinta P. O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Tear Doclie, Confirming our telephone conversation, the historical Society would like to held our Membership Reception as a wine tasting party on Sunday October 21" at the Museum from 4 to b pm. Our experience suggests about fifty attendees As in the past, we wish to invite everyone to bring a bottle of their favorite wine, labeled with their name, to share with other attendee,;. We will provide soft drinks, water and. food. This event will be free with no charge for the beverages or food. Weather permitting we would like to set up the beverages on folding cables out of doors with the food indoors. The reason for having this event at, the Museum is to showcase our facility and encourage participation in our programs for the new season, I appreciate you support and look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, t 00 ' d 890 a Z.0 t0.' 80180 t'B L L Z44 034 u 1 m-1 j r &-tect.Awe Gu4 CV T444f 4 4 a$ dArA COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Authorization for the City Manager to Sign a Contract Extension for a Year with Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC for AB 939 Services for Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: C;)L O STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Authorize the City Manager to sign a contract extension with Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC for AB 939 services for Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 in an amount not to exceed $43,000. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The Community Development Department has budgeted $40,000 for AB 939 consultant services which represents the dollar amount used for the last two years. The contract is for the implementation of AB 939 programs to assure the City's compliance with the State's AB 939 mandate. The requested Scope of Services has increased dollar -wise for Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 by $2,740 which represents increases in the hourly cost of consulting services. Adequate AB 939 funds are available in account 101-402-605-542 within the Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 budget. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW On May 5, 1998, the City Council originally approved a recommendation of staff to hire Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC as the City's AB 939 consultants. On June 15, 1999, and again on July 18, 2000, the City Council approved contract extensions for FY 1999/2000 and 2000/2001. The proposed Scope of Services provides for monitoring of current programs, implementation of a few selected programs (such as an organic waste and community outreach program), as well as monitoring the City's Waste Contract. Pursuant to City Council Resolution 96-80, "...Prescribing the Procedures, Rules and Regulations Governing the Solicitation and Selection of Firms and Award of Contracts G:\WPDOCS\CCJH.006 15 Pursuant to City Council Resolution 96-80, "...Prescribing the Procedures, Rules and Regulations Governing the Solicitation and Selection of Firms and Award of Contracts for the Furnishing of Personal Services, Professional or Consulting Services, or other Contractual Services Which are not Subject to the Formal Bidding Procedures..." Section 9, "Exceptions - Renewal of Contracts", states that the City Council is permitted to authorize the City Manager to bypass the competitive selection process in the renewal of a renegotiation of an existing contract for continuing services. Based on this Resolution, staff is recommending the contract with Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC be extended for the next Fiscal Year rather than preparing a Request for Proposals and going through the selection process. Staff has established a good working relationship with the consultants and the Scope of Services for 2001 /2002 will be similar to the 2000/2001 contract (Attachment 1) with the addition of the Construction and Demolition Debris Plan. Item 6-Franchise Administration/Negotiation Assistance has been deleted from this contract as it will not be needed for eight years. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Authorize the City Manager to sign a contract extension with Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC for AB 939 services for Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 in an amount not to exceed $43,000; or 2. Do not authorize the City Manager to sign a contract extension with Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC for AB 939 services for Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 in an amount not to exceed $43,000 and direct staff to prepare a Request for Proposal for distribution; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, frry Hyman ommunity Development Director Approved for submission by: I Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Contract for Professional Services ,Tle1 G:\WPDOCS\CCJH.006 ATTACHMENTS 161 V133 ATTACHMENT #1 CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (the "Agreement"), is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA, (the "City"), a California municipal corporation, and HILTON FARNKOPF & HOBSON, LLC., (the "Contractor"). The parties hereto agree as follows: 1.0 SERVICES OF CONTRACTOR 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the CONTRACTOR shall provide those services related to assistance with AB 939 implementation, as specified in the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference (the "services"). CONTRACTOR agrees that all services will be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner in accordance with the standards prevalent in the industry for such services. 1.2 CONTRACTOR's Proposal. The Scope of Services shall include the CONTRACTOR's proposal or bid, if any, which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. 1.3 Compliance with Law. All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, regulations and laws of THE CITY of La Quinta and any Federal, State or local governmental agency of competent jurisdiction. 1.4 Licenses, Permits. Fees and Assessments. CONTRACTOR shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. 1.5 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, CONTRACTOR warrants that (a) it has thoroughly investigated and considered the work to be performed, (b) it has investigated the site of the work and fully acquainted itself with the conditions there existing, (c) it has carefully considered how the work should be performed, and (d) it fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the work under this Agreement. Should the CONTRACTOR discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the work, or as represented by THE CITY, it shall immediately inform THE CITY of such fact and shall not proceed except at CONTRACTOR's risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer (as defined in Section 4.2 hereof). u04 Ifi2 CONT-HiltonFarnkopf&Hopson. 1 Agreement for Consulting Services -Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC 1.6 Care of Work. The CONTRACTOR shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers and other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by THE CITY, except such losses or damages as may be caused by THE CITY's own negligence. The performance of services by CONTRACTOR shall not relieve CONTRACTOR from any obligation to correct any incomplete, inaccurate or detective work at no further cost to THE CITY, when such inaccuracies are due to the negligence of CONTRACTOR. 1.7 Additional Services. In accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the CONTRACTOR shall perform services in addition to those specified in the Scope of Services (Exhibit "A") when directed to do so by the Contract Officer, provided that CONTRACTOR shall not be required to perform any additional services without compensation. Any addition in compensation not exceeding ten percent (10%) of the Contract Sum may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increase must be approved by THE CITY Council. 1.8 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the "Special Requirements" attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit "B" and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit "B" shall govern. 2.0 COMPENSATION. 2.1 Contract Sum. For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, the CONTRACTOR shall be compensated in accordance with the "Schedule of Compensation" attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by this reference, but not exceeding the maximum contract amount of Forty -Three Thousand Dollars ($43,000) (the "Contract Sum"), except as provided in Section 1.7. The method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation may include a lump sum payment upon completion, payment in accordance with the percentage of completion of the services, payment for time and materials based upon the CONTRACTOR's rates as specified in Exhibit "C", but not exceeding the Contract Sum, or such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation (Exhibit "C"). 3.0 PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 3.1 Time of Essence. Agreement. Time is of the essence in the performance of this 163 CONT-HiltonFarnkopf&Hopson. 2 Agreement for Consulting Services -Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC 3.2 Schedule of Performance. All services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed diligently and within the time period established in the "Schedule of Performance" attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and incorporated herein by this reference. Extensions to the time period specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer. 3.3 Force Majeure. The time period specified in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit "D") for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemic, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargos, acts of any governmental agency other than THE CITY, and unusually severe weather, if the CONTRACTOR shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contracting Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contracting Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the forced delay when and if in his judgment such delay is justified, and the Contracting Officer's determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Section 7.8 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit "D"). 4.0 COORDINATION OF WORK 4.1 Representative of CONTRACTOR. The following principals of CONTRACTOR are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of CONTRACTOR authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: a. Laith B. Ezzet, CMC, Senior Vice President It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Laith B. Ezzet and Susan Collins were a substantial inducement for THE CITY to enter into his Agreement. Therefore, they shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of CONTRACTOR and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. They may not be changed by CONTRACTOR and no other personnel may be assigned to perform the service required hereunder without the express written approval of City. 4.2 Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be the Community Development Director or such other person as may be designated by the City Manager of THE CITY. It shall be the CONTRACTOR's responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept 164 u06 CONT-HiltonFarnkopf&Hopson. 3 Agreement for Consulting Services -Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the CONTRACTOR shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. 4.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assianm ent. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of CONTRACTOR, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for THE CITY to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, CONTRACTOR shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of THE CITY. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be assigned or transferred, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of City. 4.4 Independent CONTRACTOR. Neither THE CITY nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which CONTRACTOR, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth. CONTRACTOR shall perform all services required herein as an independent CONTRACTOR of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent CONTRACTOR with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. CONTRACTOR shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. 4.5 City Cooperation. THE CITY shall provide CONTRACTOR with any plans, publications, reports, statistics, records or other data or Information pertinent to services to be performed hereunder which are reasonably available to THE CITY. THE CITY shall additionally provide CONTRACTOR staff assistance and shall take prompt and appropriate action when it will assist in ensuring and timely performance by CONTRACTOR hereunder. 5.0 INSURANCE, INDEMNIFICATION AND BONDS. 5.1 Insurance. The CONTRACTOR shall procure and maintain, at its cost, and submit concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, public liability and property damage insurance against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property resulting from CONTRACTOR's negligent acts or omissions rising out of or related to CONTRACTOR's performance under this Agreement. The insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that the coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of CONTRACTOR's performance hereunder and neither THE CITY nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to any such loss. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming THE CITY and its officers and employees as additional insureds shall be delivered to and approved by THE CITY prior to commencement of the services hereunder. The amount of insurance required hereunder shall be determined by the Contract Sum in accordance with the following table: CONT-HiltonFarnkopf&Hopson. 4 Agreement for Consulting Services -Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC Coverage (personal injury/ Contract Sum property damage) Less than $50,000 $100,000 per individual; $300,000 per occurrence $50,000 - $300,000 $250,000 per individual; $500,000 per occurrence Over $300,000 $500,000 per individual; $1,000,000 per occurrence The CONTRACTOR shall also carry automobile liability insurance of $1,000,000 per accident against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property arising out of the use of any automobile by the CONTRACTOR, its officers, any directly or indirectly employed by the CONTRACTOR, any subcontractor, and agents or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, arising directly or indirectly out of or related to CONTRACTOR's performance under this Agreement. The term "automobile" includes, but is not limited to, a land motor vehicle, trailer or semi -trailer designed for travel on public roads. The automobile insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of CONTRACTOR's performance hereunder and neither THE CITY nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to such loss. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming THE CITY and its officers and employees as additional insureds shall be delivered to and approved by THE CITY prior to commencement of the services hereunder. CONTRACTOR shall also carry Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with State Workers' Compensation laws. The CONTRACTOR shall procure professional errors and omissions liability insurance in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000). All insurance required by this Section shall be kept in effect during the term of this Agreement and shall not be cancelable without thirty (30) days' written notice of proposed cancellation to City. The procuring of such insurance or the delivery of policies or certificates evidencing the same shall not be construed as a limitation of CONTRACTOR's obligation to indemnify THE CITY, its officers, employees, CONTRACTOR's, subcontractors or agents. 5.2 Indemnification. The CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless THE CITY, its officers, officials, employees, representatives and agents, from and against any and all actions, suits, proceedings, claims, demands, losses, costs, and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys' fees, for injury to or death of person(s), for damage to property (including property owned by THE CITY) and for negligent errors and omissions committed by CONTRACTOR, its officers, anyone directly or indirectly employed by CONTRACTOR, any subcontractor, and agents or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, arising directly or indirectly out of or related to CONTRACTOR's negligent performance under this Agreement, except to the extent of such loss as may be caused by City's own active negligence, sole negligence or willful misconduct, or that of its officers or employees. 1613 CONT-HiltonFarnkopf&Hopson. 5 Agreement for Consulting Services -Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC 5.3 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies THE CITY may have if CONTRACTOR fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, THE CITY may, at its sole option: a. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement. b. Order the CONTRACTOR to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to CONTRACTOR hereunder until CONTRACTOR demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. C. Terminate this Agreement. Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to any other remedies THE CITY may have and are not the exclusive remedies for CONTRACTOR's failure to maintain or secure appropriate policies or endorsements. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which CONTRACTOR may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from CONTRACTOR's or its subcontractors' performance of work under this Agreement. 6.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS. 6.1 Reports. CONTRACTOR shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. 6.2 Records. CONTRACTOR shall keep such books and records as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the cost and the performance of such services. Books and records pertaining to costs shall be kept and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all reasonable times, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. 6.3 Ownership of Documents. Originals of all drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials, whether in hard copy or electronic form, which are prepared by CONTRACTOR, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement, shall be the property of THE CITY and shall be delivered to THE CITY upon the termination of this Agreement or upon the earlier request of the Contract Officer, and CONTRACTOR shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by THE CITY of its full rights of ownership of the documents and materials hereunder. CONTRACTOR may retain copies of such documents for its own use. CONTRACTOR shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied herein. CONTRACTOR shall cause all subcontractors to assign to THE CITY any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event CONTRACTOR fails to secure such assignment, CONTRACTOR shall indemnify THE CITY for all damages suffered thereby. CONT-HiltonFarnkopf&Hopson. 6 167 Agreement for Consulting Services -Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC 6.4 Release of Documents. The drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials prepared by CONTRACTOR in the performance of services under this Agreement shall not be released publicly without the prior written approval of the Contract Officer or as required by law. CONTRACTOR shall not disclose to any other private entity or person any information regarding the activities of THE CITY, except as required by law or as authorized by THE CITY. 7.0 ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT. 7.1. California Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and CONTRACTOR covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. 7.2 Disputes. In the event of any dispute arising under this Agreement, the injured party shall notify the injuring party in writing of its contentions by submitting a claim therefor. The injured party shall continue performing its obligations hereunder so long as the injuring party commences to cure such default within ten (10) days of service of such notice and completes the cure of such default within forty-five (45) days after service of the notice, or such longer period as may be permitted by the Contract Officer; provided that if the default is an immediate danger to the health, safety and general welfare, THE CITY may take such immediate action as THE CITY deems warranted. Compliance with the provisions of this Section shall be a condition precedent to termination of this Agreement for cause and to any legal action, and such compliance shall not be a waiver of any party's right to take legal action in the event that the dispute is not cured, provided that nothing herein shall limit THE CITY's right to terminate this Agreement without cause pursuant to Section 7.8. 7.3 Retention of Funds. THE CITY may withhold from any monies payable to CONTRACTOR sufficient funds to compensate THE CITY for any losses, costs, liabilities or damages it reasonably believes were suffered by THE CITY due to the default of CONTRACTOR in the performance of the services required by this Agreement. 7.4 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a nondefaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. THE CITY's consent or approval of any act by CONTRACTOR requiring THE CITY's consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary THE CITY's consent to or approval of any subsequent act of CONTRACTOR. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 168 010 CONT-HiltonFarnkopf&Hopson. 7 Agreement for Consulting Services -Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC 7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 7.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, at law or at equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. 7.7 Termination Prior To Expiration Of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Agreement, except as specifically provided in the following Section 7.8 for termination for cause. THE CITY reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to CONTRACTOR. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, CONTRACTOR shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to receipt of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation (Exhibit "C") or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. 7.8 Termination For Default Of CONTRACTOR. If termination is due to the failure of the CONTRACTOR to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, THE CITY may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the CONTRACTOR shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that THE CITY shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and THE CITY may withhold any payments to the CONTRACTOR for the purpose of setoff or partial payment of the amounts owed THE CITY as previously stated in Section 7.3. 7.9 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit from the losing party. 8.0 CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES; NON-DISCRIMINATION. 8.1 Non-liabilityof f City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of THE CITY shall be personally liable to the CONTRACTOR, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by THE CITY or for any amount which may become due to the CONTRACTOR or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. CONT-HiltonFarnkopf&Hopson. 8 169 Agreement for Consulting Services -Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC 8.2 Conflict of Interest. No officer or employee of THE CITY shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which effects his personal interest or the interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. The CONTRACTOR warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement. 8.3 Covenant against Discrimination. CONTRACTOR covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, disability or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, age or ancestry. 9.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9.1 Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail to the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty-eight (48) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section 9.1. To City: CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Attention: City Manager To Contractor: HILTON FARNKOPF & HOBSON, LLC 3990 Westerly Plaza, Suite 195 Newport Beach, CA 92660-2311 Attention: Laith Ezzet 9.2 Integrated Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the parties and all previous understandings, negotiations and agreements are integrated into and superseded by this Agreement. o12 CONT-HiltonFarnkopf&Hopson. 9 170 Agreement for Consulting Services -Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC 9.3 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the parties by an instrument in writing signed by both parties. 9.4 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not effect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder. 9.5 Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that by so executing this Agreement the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates stated below. Dated: ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney Dated: CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation THOMAS P. GENOVESE, City Manager "CITY" HILTON FARNKOPF & HOPSON, LLC In Name: Title: 171 CONT-HiltonFarnkopf&Hopson. 10 U13 Agreement for Consulting Services -Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES (Attached) U14 CONT-HiltonFarnkopf&Hopson. 11 172 Agreement for Consulting Services -Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC EXHIBIT "B" SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS A. Generally. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for preparation of work products or deliverables as specified in the Scope of Services, attached hereto and herein incorporated by reference. All deliverables shall be in an 8.5 inch by 11.0 inch camera ready reproducible format, printed on one side only. B. Monthly Progress Reports. CONTRACTOR shall submit to THE CITY a written monthly progress prior to or at the monthly coordinating meeting. These reports are considered a deliverable and, as such, a condition of this Agreement. Each progress report shall include, at a minimum, the following: • For each Task, a brief statement of the work performed since the last monthly progress report; • For each Task, a comparison of actual accomplishments to established objectives, milestones and/or deadlines; • Identification of reason(s) for "slippage" or "delay" if deadlines were not met or for failure to meet objectives or milestones. • Discussion of any issues that may have arisen or are expected to arise, problems encountered, changes in personnel, etc., that could affect or are affecting the work. • Discussion of any proposed changes in or amendments to the Scope of Services. • Work planned for the next reporting period and anticipated accomplishments. C. Each monthly progress report shall be updated to reflect an entire calendar month and subsequently submitted as a required attachment to any request for payment submitted by CONTRACTOR. Receipt and approval of monthly progress reports by THE CITY is mandatory prior to any issuance of payment to CONTRACTOR. D. CONTRACTOR shall prepare a "checklist" of milestones, such as meetings, and/or deliverables or other readily identifiable achievements, together with the percent of work represented by that milestone, deliverable, and/or achievement of the total work to be completed to fulfill the terms and conditions of this Agreement. A corresponding entry for each milestone, deliverable, and/or achievement shall be included on a "Calendar of Activities'; which shall be prepared by the CONT-HiltonFarnkopf&Hopson. 12 173 ( 1 l 5 Agreement for Consulting Services -Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC CONTRACTOR. Subsequent to THE CITY'S approval of this checklist, payment up to and including fifty percent (50%) of the maximum allowable cost for each task shall be made to CONTRACTOR in accordance with the checklist. By.way of example, for a month in which CONTRACTOR prepares and submits to THE CITY a draft ordinance which is identified on the checklist as representing ten percent (10%) of the total work to complete that Task, CONTRACTOR may request payment in the amount of ten percent (10%) of the maximum allowable cost for that task. THE CITY shall make payment to CONTRACTOR for all such requests for payment up to but not exceeding an amount greater than fifty percent (50%) of the maximum allowable cost for that task. The checklist and Calendar of Activities are incorporated herein by reference to the contract. E. THE CITY shall withhold and retain fifty percent (50%) of the maximum allowable cost for each of the aforementioned tasks subject to this method of compensation. Upon completion of work in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the checklist as approved by THE CITY. THE CITY shall release an amount up to but not exceeding this remainder fifty percent (50%) as a lump sum payment to CONTRACTOR, upon receipt, review and approval of CONTRACTOR'S final payment request. CONTRACTOR'S obligations under the terms of this AGREEMENT shall be deemed discharged upon issuance of this final lump sum payment. F. Responsibilities of CONTRACTOR. In any month for which CONTRACTOR is entitled to payment, CONTRACTOR shall submit to THE CITY'S Contract Officer a written request for payment that conforms to the following: • Submitted by or on the tenth day of the following month; • Submitted in a format prescribed by THE CITY; • Submitted together with a monthly progress report; • Submitted together with supporting documentation (bids, receipts, cancelled checks, invoices, etc.). G. Responsibilities of THE CITY. THE CITY'S Contract Officer shall review all requests for payment to determine whether services performed and deliverable(s) submitted are consistent with this Agreement. Upon approval by the Contract Officer, payment to CONTRACTOR shall be made as promptly as fiscal procedures permit, generally within 30 days. CONT-HiltonFarnkopf&Hopson. 13 174 ulf Agreement for Consulting Services -Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC H. Disputes. In the event of a disputed or contested request for payment, only that portion so disputed or contested shall be withheld from payment and the undisputed portion shall be paid. CONTRACTOR'S failure to provide legible receipts shall be grounds for non -reimbursement of related charges. THE CITY shall notify CONTRACTOR in writing of the basis of the dispute or contest. I. Records. THE CITY shall have the right to review all books and records kept by CONTRACTOR and any subcontractors in connection with the operation and services performed under this Agreement. THE CITY shall withhold payment for any expenditure not substantiated by CONTRACTOR'S or subcontractors' books or records. CONTRACTOR shall ensure that such books and records are retained for a period of three (3) years after satisfaction of the terms of this Agreement and that THE CITY shall have reasonable access to said books and records. J. Task Budget Amendments; Obligation of CONTRACTOR. It shall be the responsibility of CONTRACTOR to notify THE CITY that there is a need to consider shifting funds from task to task in order to increase or decrease the maximum allowable cost. Notice shall be given to THE CITY within a reasonable amount of time of discovering the need for revision such that THE CITY may duly consider the need and subsequent impacts upon the work to be completed and the calendar of scheduled activities. CONT-HiltonFarnkopf&Hopson. 14 U 17 175 Agreement for Consulting Services -Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC EXHIBIT "D" SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE This contract is for the time period between July 19, 2001 and June 30, 2002. All work shall be performed within this time frame. 176 RL CONT-HiltonFarnkopf&Hopson. 15 Agreement for Consulting Services -Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES Proposed Tasks for AB 939 Implementation for 2001-2002 Task 1- On -going Maintenance Activities HF&H will track solid waste legislation, regulations, CIWMB policy decisions, and issues such as facility closures and start-ups in the Coachella Valley. On- going maintenance also includes monitoring CVAG meetings and initiatives. Monitoring of CVAG Solid Waste Technical Working Group meetings and initiatives is an important way to participate in solid waste management and diversion programs that are conducted collectively by the members of CVAG. HF&H will also be available to attend meetings of the Riverside County Solid Waste Management Task Force if requested. This task also includes development of AB 939 programs necessary to keep the City in compliance with AB 939. In fiscal year 2001 /02, we propose to complete our ongoing work on the Construction and Demolition Debris Management Plan, including development of the ordinance, as appropriate. This task also includes technical assistance and follow-up with commercial waste generators which is becoming more important as commercial waste becomes a larger portion of La Quinta's waste stream. Task 2 - Reporting and Other Compliance Activities HF&H will prepare the City's AB 939 Annual Report to the CIWMB which will include documentation of all diversion activities conducted throughout the previous calendar year, as well as calculation of numerical compliance with AB 939 diversion mandates. We will also develop and discuss with the City a strategy to continue to meet both the numerical and programmatic goals of AB 939 in order to achieve compliance with the law. Task 3 - Community Outreach We will coordinate recycling activities at special events, such as the Bob Hope Chrysler Classic, the annual telephone book recycling program and other special events. Coordination requires contacting event managers and the City's waste hauler to coordinate diversion activities. Task 4 - Public Education Coordination HF&H will coordinate the preparation of flyers, advertising, and other public education materials throughout the year. Coordination of advertising includes 1,7 contacting the County's Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Round -up coordinator and the County's HHW Round -up contractor, the La Quinta Page 1 of 4 u19 Agreement for Consulting Services -Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC Chamber of Commerce, and newspapers such as the Desert Sun to place ads in newsletters or newspapers. Coordination includes contacting participating entities for event information and telephone numbers, transmitting this information to content copywriters and designers, and ensuring timely delivery of final artwork and copy to the printer and mailing house. Actual costs for printing, design, mailing, and advertising costs are not included in the budget for this task. Task 5 - Green Waste Diversion We will continue to monitor measures to increase green waste diversion in both the residential and commercial sectors. We will monitor green waste facility development in the Coachella Valley and work with major commercial generators (e.g., golf courses.) We will investigate strategies to increase residential green waste diversion, such as increased public education and development of a "Master Composter" program, if needed. Task6 - Franchise Administration/Negotiation Assistance We will c duct analyses and prepare summary memoranda related to franchise administrat n, as directed by the Director of Community Development, and as the project bu et allows. Franchise administration may include such tasks as the following: • Disposal Tonnage conciliation • Franchise Agreemen enegotiation Assistance • Review of Proposed Ra Adjustment • Transfer Agreement Nego ' tion Assistance • Review of Franchise Agreem t Compliance We anticipate that some of these fran ise administration tasks will be necessary in the coming year, while others will no e needed. The Director of Community Development will decide which tasks are a riority for this year. Task 7 - Meetings and Management We will attend a maximum of ten meetings (approximately one per month) with city staff. Each month, we will prepare a status report, meeting agendas, and conduct overall project management. FEES We will perform the scope of work based on time and materials. The specific tasks we perform will be determined by mutual agreement with City staff, and the director of Community Development may direct us to allocate our time differently than that which is specified on the attached workplan. The estimated 178 budget, based on the level of effort assumed in the workplan that follows, is $45,000, excluding outside printing, mailing and design. u20 Page 2 of 4 Agreement for Consulting Services -Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC We will bill you once per month based on the hours worked and expenses incurred. Payment is due within 30 days of invoicing, and a late fee of 1% per month will be added to invoices more than 30 days past due. Hourly rates for our consultants are as follows: Senior Vice President Senior Associate Associate Professional Assistant Expenses will be billed as follows: Mileage In-house document reproduction Public conveyances and parking Document couriers/postage Other client related travel Telephone Outside printing, mailing and design * Or as adjusted by the IRS for mileage allowance $200 $155 $135 $70 $0.345 per mile* $0.15 per page Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual plus 15% 179 u?1. Page 3 of 4 Agreement for Consulting Services -Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC AB 939 Implementation Fee Estimate TASK DESCRIPTION Senior Vice President Senior Associate Professional Assistant Total Hours 1. Ongoing Maintenance A. Monitor legislation, regulations, etc. 1 20 8 29 B. Construction & Demolition Debris Plan 0, 28 4 32 C. Technical Assistance to Businesses 2 4Q 0 42 Task 1: Hours 3 88 12 103 Task 1: Fees $ 15,080 2. Reporting and AB 939 Compliance A. Prepare AB 939 Annual Report 2 32 8 42 B. Respond to CIWMB inquiries 0 Task 2: Hours 2 40 10 52 Task 2: Fees $ 7,300 3. Community Outreach A. Coordination of special events 1 16 2 1-9- Task 3: Fees $ 2,820 4. Public Education Coordination A. Coordinate preparation of pubhc education 2 16 2 2Q materials Task 4: Fees $ 3,020 5. Green Waste Diversion A. Monitor green waste diversion 1 16 2 12 programs . Task 5: Fees $ 2,820 6. Nnchise Administration/Negotiation sistance A. orator franchise agreement compliancX 2 1 12 14 B. Fr225t1sea eement renegotiation assist a To be �etermined C. TransieSaeement negotiation assistance Task 6: H s 2 12 0 14 Task 6: Fees $ 2,2 7. Meetings and Project Management A. Meetings 0 48 10 58 B. Project management 2 12 4 18 Task 7: Hours 2 60 14 76 Task 7: Fees $ 10,680 Total Hours 13 248 42 229 Hourly Rates $ 200 $ 155 $ 70 Total Fees $ 2,600 $ 38,440 $ 2,940 $ 43,980 Expenses $ 1,020 Total Fees and Expenses , q cp 1 .-740 Page 4 of 4 180 `" CiF 'it,9� 4 44" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 Consideration of an Ordinance Repealing Chapter 5.32 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (Massage Baths and Similar Businesses), and Adopting the Coachella Valley Model Massage Ordinance for the Consistent Regulation and Reciprocal Permitting of Massage Therapy Business Activities Within the Coachella Valley as Chapter 5.32 of the La Quinta Municipal Code RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: / CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Introduce an Ordinance repealing Chapter 5.32, (Massage Baths and Similar Businesses), and Adopting the Model Massage Ordinance for the Consistent Regulation and Reciprocal Permitting of Massage Therapy Business Activities Within the Coachella Valley: A. Move to take up Ordinance No. by title and number only and waive further reading. B. Move to introduce Ordinance No. on first reading. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The current City fee to defray the costs of processing a massage permit is $25. The proposed regulations would mandate a $200 fee to process an on -site massage therapist permit, a $250 fee to process a massage therapist permit with an off premises endorsement (licensed to provide massage therapy on an out call basis), and a $500 fee to process a permit for a massage establishment. The Ordinance provides that an applicant may apply for, receive, and pay for a permit in one jurisdiction that would be valid in all the participating Valley cities. Due to this fact, the net fiscal impact on the City associated with processing massage permits is undetermined, but would be relatively minimal. Regardless of where the massage therapist permit was processed, approved applicants would still be required to obtain a La Quinta business license if they were operating as an independent contractor; therefore , there would be no impact on the business license fee revenue. 181 CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS• None. At the January 16, 2001 meeting, the City Council made a motion to support the Valley -wide massage Ordinance with an amendment to include the regulation of baths. The respective city attorneys from CVAG's member jurisdictions have reviewed the draft ordinance and have made recommendations which have been incorporated, (including the regulation of baths) into the Ordinance under consideration. Our City Attorney has reviewed the amended document and approves the Ordinance as to form. CVAG's Human and Community Resources Committee, and the Executive Committee, have recommended that the Ordinance be considered by the member City Councils. The local massage industry is hopeful that all the jurisdictions in the Valley will adopt the Ordinance, providing massage therapists with a standardized application process with reciprocal rights in participating cities. Each jurisdiction will retain complete enforcement responsibility for the new regulations in their respective cities. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Introduce an Ordinance repealing Chapter 5.32, (Massage Baths and Similar Businesses), and Adopting the Model Massage Ordinance for the Consistent Regulation and Reciprocal Permitting of Massage Therapy Business Activities Within the Coachella Valley; or 2. Do not Introduce an Ordinance repealing Chapter 5.32, (Massage Baths and Similar Businesses), and Adopting the Model Massage Ordinance for the Consistent Regulation and Reciprocal Permitting of Massage Therapy Business Activities Within the Coachella Valley; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, 1� Tom Hartung, Director of Building & Safety 182 A ov d for sub ssio by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager U AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA REPEALING CHAPTER 5.32 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING THE COACHELLA VALLEY MODEL MASSAGE ORDINANCE FOR THE CONSISTENT REGULATION AND RECIPROCAL PERMITTING OF MASSAGE THERAPY BUSINESS ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE COACHELLA VALLEY, AS CHAPTER 5.32 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. FINDINGS A. The City Council finds that massage therapy is an integral component of the scope of services sought by residents and tourists when visiting the Coachella Valley. B. The City Council finds and determines that licensing standards pertaining to massage therapy business activities are necessary to protect the public health and safety and the personal safety of massage therapists. C. The City Council further finds that public health and safety is best served by the adoption of a model ordinance providing for regulation of massage therapy activities in a manner that is consistent throughout the Coachella Valley. D. The City Council finds and determines that a deposit fee is necessary to offset the costs associated with the implementation and administration of this ordinance. SECTION II. PURPOSE AND INTENT A. The purpose of this ordinance is to insure the protection of the public health and safety and the personal safety of massage therapists through the establishment of certain licensing standards pertaining to massage therapy business activities within the Coachella Valley and to recognize massage therapy as a legitimate business occupation and health enhancement service. B. This model ordinance, upon adoption by this and the other cities within the Coachella Valley, shall provide for the consistent regulation and reciprocal permitting of massage therapy business activities throughout the Coachella 183 003 Valley. C. Nothing in this ordinance is intended to permit any use, conduct, and/or activity that violates any federal, state or local law or regulation. SECTION III REPEAL OF CHAPTER 5.3 Chapter 5.32 of the La Quinta Municipal Code is hereby repealed. SECTION IV. RE -ADOPTION OF CHAPTER 5.32 Chapter 5.32 of the La Quinta Municipal Code is hereby adopted as follows: 5.32.010 Definitions. A. 'Applicant' means the individual seeking a permit pursuant to this Chapter. B. "Certified copy" shall mean a copy of a document that is certified by the issuer as being a true and accurate copy of the original document or a similar document bearing an original signature of the issuer. C. "Certified statement" shall mean a written assertion, claim or declaration bearing the original signature of the issuer. D. "Coachella Valley Model Massage Ordinance "shall mean .the provisions of this ordinance as adopted by this or any other jurisdiction within the Coachella Valley. E. "Communicable disease" shall mean tuberculosis, or any disease, which may be transmitted from a massage therapist to a patron through normal physical contact during the performance of any massage service. F. "Complete application"shall mean an application, which provides all of the requisite information required to be provided by an applicant pursuant to this Chapter. G. `Disqualifying conduct" means any of the following when occurring within five (5) years of any application made pursuant to this Chapter: (a) Pandering as set forth in California Penal Code Section 266i; (b) Keeping or residing in a house of ill -fame as set forth in California Penal Code Section 315; "[,'66VA 004 (c) Keeping a house for the purpose of assignation or prostitution, or other disorderly house as set forth in California Penal Code Section 316; (d) Prevailing upon a person to visit a place of illegal gambling or prostitution as set forth in California Penal Code Section 318; (e) Lewd conduct as set forth in California Penal Code Section 647, subdivision (a); (f) Prostitution activities as set forth in California Penal Code Section 647, subdivision (b); (g) Any offense committed in any other state which, if committed or attempted in this state, would have been punishable as one or more of the offenses set forth in California Penal Code Sections 266(i), 315, 316, 318, or 647, subdivisions (a) or (b); (h) Any felony offense involving the sale of any controlled substance specified in California Health and Safety Code Sections 11054, 11055, 11056, 11057, or 1 1058; (i) Any offense committed in any other state which, if committed or attempted in this state, would have been punishable as a felony offense involving the sale of any controlled substance specified in California Health and Safety Code Sections 11054, 11055, 11056, 11057, or 1 1058- (j) Any misdemeanor or felony offense which relates directly to the practice of massage therapy, whether as a massage therapy business owner or operator, or as a massage therapist; or (k) Any felony the commission of which occurred on the premises of a massage therapy establishment. H. `Filing date of application" shall mean the date on which the Permit Administrator determines that a complete application pursuant to this Chapter has been submitted to the Permit Administrator by the applicant. I. `Full nudity" or `semi -nudity" shall mean any of the following: (a) the appearance or display of an anus, male or female genital, pubic region, or a female breast below a point immediately above the top of the areola, and/or (b) a state of undress which less than completely and opaquely covers an anus, male or female genital, pubic region or a female breast below a point immediately above the top of the areola. J. `Manager" means the individual(s) who are responsible for the 185 005 management and/or supervision of a massage therapy business. K. "Massage" or "massage therapy" shall mean any method of pressure on, or friction against, or stroking, kneading, rubbing, tapping, pounding, vibrating, or stimulating the external parts of the human body with the hands or with the aid of any mechanical or electrical apparatus or appliances, with or without supplementary aids such as creams, ointments, or other similar preparations commonly used in the practice of massage, under such circumstances that it is reasonably expected that the person to whom the treatment is provided or some third person on his or her behalf will pay money or give any other consideration or any gratuity therefor. "Massage" and "massage therapy" shall include such manipulation of the body or similar procedures described in this paragraph that are performed in hydrotherapy, spa or similar bath facilities. L. "Massage therapy establishment" shall mean any establishment having a fixed place of business for the purpose of deriving income or compensation from massage therapy services, whether or not massage is performed on the premises. M. 'Massage therapist" shall mean an individual who, for any consideration whatsoever, performs or offers to perform a massage. N. "'Operator" shall mean any of the following: (a) the owner, (b) the permit holder and applicant(s) therefor, (c) custodian, (d) manager, or (e) person in charge of any massage therapy establishment. 0. "Off -premises massage" shall mean a massage performed at a location that is not a massage therapy establishment for which a permit to operate as a massage therapy establishment has been granted by the City. P. `Patron"shall mean any person who receives a massage in exchange for any form of consideration including, but not limited to, the payment of money. Q. 'Permit" shall mean the written license to engage in the practice of massage for compensation as required by the Coachella Valley Model Massage Ordinance. A "Reciprocal Permit" shall mean a permit issued by this jurisdiction based solely on the fact that applicant holds a valid massage therapist permit issued by another jurisdiction pursuant to the Coachella Valley Model Massage Ordinance. An "Original Permit" shall mean a massage therapist permit issued by this jurisdiction without regard to whether or not applicant holds a massage therapist permit issued by another jurisdiction. A Massage Establishment Permit shall mean a permit issued to the owner or operator of any massage therapy establishment. The massage establishment permit does not exempt the individual massage therapist, providing massage services at the establishment, from having a separate permit to engage in the practice of �. ss r�11 massage. R. `Permit Administrator" means the City Manager or his designee, who will be responsible for issuing, revoking and otherwise administering any provision of this Chapter. S. `Permittee" shall mean the person to whom a permit has been issued pursuant to the Coachella Valley Model Massage Ordinance and the applicants therefor. T. "Person" shall mean any of the following: (a) an individual, (b) a proprietorship, (c) a partnership, (d) a corporation, (e) an association, (f) a limited liability company or (f) any other legal entity. U. 'Physician's Certificate"shall mean a certified statement from a physician licensed to practice medicine in the United States that provides that the applicant has, within sixty days prior to the filing date of the application, been examined by said physician and it has been determined that the applicant is free of any communicable disease as defined in this Chapter. V . "Recognized School of Massage,, shall mean any school or educational institution licensed or approved by the state in which it is located, whose purpose it is to upgrade the professionalism of massage therapists and which teaches the theory, ethics, practice, profession or work of massage and which requires a resident course of study before the student shall be furnished with a diploma or a certificate of graduation from such school or institution of learning following the successful completion of such course of study or learning. Schools offering a correspondence course not requiring actual attendance shall not be deemed a recognized school. W. "Specified anatomical area" shall mean human genitals, pubic region, anus, or a female breast below a point immediately above the top of the areola. X. "Specified sexual activities" shall mean any of the following: (a) the fondling or other erotic touching of human genitals, pubic region, anus, or female breasts, (b) sex acts, normal or perverted, actual or simulated, including, but not limited to, inter -course, oral copulation, masturbation, or sodomy, or (c) excretory functions as part of or in connection with the fondling or other erotic touching of human genitals, pubic region, buttocks, anus, or female breasts, sex acts, normal or perverted, actual or simulated, including inter -course, oral copulation, masturbation, or sodomy. 5.32.020 Massage Therapy Permits Required. A. Massage Therapist Permit. Except as expressly provided in this Chapter, 187 007 only a person holding a current massage therapist permit issued pursuant to this Chapter shall perform or offer to perform massage therapy at a massage therapy establishment located within the City. Nothing herein shall exempt a person from zoning or other applicable requirements set out elsewhere in this Code or in the Zoning Ordinance, and every person shall comply with all such requirements. B. Off -premises Endorsement to Massage Therapist Permit. Except as expressly provided in this Chapter, no person shall perform or offer to perform an off -premises massage unless he or she has a valid massage therapist permit, with an off -premises endorsement, issued to him or her pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter. Nothing herein shall exempt a person from zoning or other applicable requirements set out elsewhere in this Code or in the Zoning Ordinance, and every person shall comply with all such requirements. C. Unless specifically exempted by state law, the fact that a person possesses other types of permits and/or licenses does not exempt him or her from the requirement of obtaining a permit that is required by this Chapter. The permit requirements of this Chapter shall be in addition to the requirement of a business license set out elsewhere in this Code, as well as any other license, permit or fee required by any local, county, state or federal law. 5.32.030 Consent. By applying for a permit under the Coachella Valley Model Massage Ordinance, the applicant shall be deemed to have consented to the provisions of this Chapter and to the exercise thereunder by the Permit Administrator and the City's officials, representatives and employees charged with implementing and/or enforcing the provisions set forth in this Chapter. 5.32.040 Permit Administrator's Responsibilities. The City shall designate a Permit Administrator who shall be responsible for granting or denying all permits described in this Chapter and said permits shall only be granted or denied pursuant to the provisions described herein and all other applicable laws. If no designation is made pursuant to this provision, the City Manager shall be deemed the Permit Administrator. Where used herein with respect to the Permit Administrator's responsibilities, words such as "shall" and "must" are not intended by the City to self -impose liability and are instead intended only to be directory. 5.32.050 Reciprocal Massage Therapist Permit Application A. If an applicant holds a current massage therapist permit issued by any 188 other jurisdiction pursuant to the Coachella Valley Model Massage Ordinance, then application for a reciprocal massage therapist permit may be made by submission, to the Permit Administrator, of all of the following: (a) A certified copy of a current massage therapist permit issued, pursuant to the Coachella Valley Model Massage Ordinance, by any other jurisdiction; (b) A certified copy of the original and all renewal applications related to the massage therapist permit issued by the other jurisdiction pursuant to the Coachella Valley Model Massage Ordinance; and (c) A non-refundable application fee of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) to defray the costs of administering this Chapter. B. If the massage therapy permit submitted in support of an application for a Reciprocal Permit includes an off -premises endorsement, the application shall be deemed an application for both a massage therapist permit and an off - premises endorsement and no further documentation, information or fees shall be required in order to apply for an off -premises endorsement to the Reciprocal Permit. 5.32.060 Original Massage Therapist Permit Application If an applicant does not hold a current massage therapist permit issued by another jurisdiction that has adopted the Coachella Valley Model Massage Ordinance, application for issuance of a massage therapist permit by this jurisdiction shall be made, under oath, on the form set out at Appendix A. The following information, documents and other requirements shall be included with the submission of all such applications: A. The applicant's legal name, any aliases and date of birth; B. A certified letter of intent to employ from the operator of a massage therapy establishment lawfully operating within the City. Each such letter shall verify that the operator of the massage therapy establishment has reviewed the applicant's qualifications and that the applicant has met the requirements necessary to perform massage therapy at that facility; C. The applicant's home and business addresses, corresponding telephone. numbers, and permanent address and telephone number, if different; D. Written evidence that the applicant is at least eighteen years of age; E. The previous home addresses of applicant for the ten years prior to the 189 009 filing date of the application and the dates of residency at each such address; F. The names, addresses and descriptions of all current and former businesses owned, operated or managed by applicant for the ten years prior to the filing date of the application and the dates applicant owned, operated or managed each such business; G. Employment history for the ten years prior to the date of application, and all massage or similar business history and experience; H. Two front -face portrait photographs taken within thirty days of the date of application, at least two inches by two inches in size; I. Applicant's weight, height, color of hair and eyes, and sex; J. The applicant's driver's license number or identification number; K. The applicant's fingerprints taken within the previous sixty (60) days by an agency approved by the Permit Administrator; L. The applicant's social security number and/or state or federally issued tax identification number; M. Proof, in the form specified here, that applicant is (i) a graduate of a Recognized School of Massage or (ii) certified by the National Certification Board for Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork. Proof of certification by the National Certification Board for Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork shall be in the form of a certified copy of the therapeutic massage and bodywork credential issued by said Board. Proof of graduation from a Recognized School of Massage shall require both of the following: (a) Certified copy of the applicant's diploma or certificate of graduation, or equivalent documentation, establishing that applicant has successfully completed the course of study for competency as a massage therapist offered by the Recognized School of Massage; and (b) Certified transcript from a Recognized School of Massage verifying applicant has successfully completed a course of study requiring at least three hundred (300) hours of massage therapy training. If the application is submitted concurrently with an application for an off -premises endorsement, the minimum hours of training shall be as set out below for an off -premises endorsement application; N. A certified statement from a physician licensed to practice medicine in the United States that provides that the applicant has, within sixty days prior 190 oio to the filing date of the application, been examined by said physician and it has been determined that the applicant is free of any communicable disease as defined in this Chapter; 0. A list of all of applicant's convictions, excluding traffic violations; P. Whether or not the applicant has ever been convicted of any disqualifying conduct; Q. Whether or not the applicant is required to register as a sex offender pursuant to the California Penal Code Section 290; R. Whether or not applicant has had a previous permit, license or other authority for massage services denied, suspended or revoked by any entity. If so, the date, location and reasons for the denial, suspension or revocation; S. Whether or not the applicant has been a sole proprietor, general partner, officer, director, member or employee of any massage therapy business that has had a permit, license or authority to operate a massage business denied, suspended or revoked by any entity. If so, the applicant shall provide the name and location of the massage therapy establishment or business for which the permit was denied, suspended or revoked, the date of the denial, suspension or revocation, and the reason(s) for the denial, suspension or revocation; and T. The applicant shall provide the Permit Administrator with the authorization to conduct the necessary background investigations to determine the truthfulness and correctness of the information provided by applicant and whether the applicant is qualified pursuant to this Chapter to receive the requested massage therapist permit. U. The applicant shall date and sign the application and declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in the application is true and correct. V. The applicant shall pay a non-refundable application deposit fee of one hundred and fifty dollars ($150.00) at the time of filing an application to defray the costs of administering this Chapter. 5.32.070 Supplemental Application For Off -Premises Endorsement If an applicant does not hold a current permit with an off -premises endorsement issued by another jurisdiction pursuant to the Coachella Valley Model Massage Ordinance, application for an off -premises endorsement to a massage therapist permit issued by this jurisdiction shall be made, under oath, 191- Oil on the form set out at Appendix B. The following information, documents and other requirements shall be included with the submission of all such applications: A. The applicant's legal name; B. A copy of applicant's massage therapist permit issued pursuant to this Chapter, or Reciprocal Permit, if application therefor is not submitted concurrently; C. Proof, in the form specified here, that applicant is (i) a graduate of a Recognized School of Massage or (ii) certified by the National Certification Board for Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork. Proof of certification by the National Certification Board for Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork shall be in the form of a certified copy of the therapeutic massage and bodywork credential issued by said Board. Proof of graduation from a Recognized School of Massage shall require both of the following: (a) Certified copy of the applicant's diploma or certificate of graduation, or equivalent documentation, establishing that applicant has successfully completed the course of study for competency as a massage therapist offered by the Recognized School of Massage; and (b) Certified transcript from a Recognized School of Massage verifying applicant has successfully completed a course of study requiring at least five hundred (500) hours of massage therapy training. D. The applicant shall provide the Permit Administrator with the authorization to conduct the necessary background investigations to determine the truthfulness and correctness of the information provided by applicant and whether the applicant is qualified pursuant to this Chapter to receive the requested off -premises endorsement. E. The applicant shall date and sign the application, declaring under penalty of perjury that the information contained in the application is true and correct. F. The applicant shall pay a non-refundable application deposit fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) at the time of filing an application for an off -premises endorsement to defray the cost of administering this Chapter, which fee shall be in addition to any other permit application fees. 5.32.080 Processing the Application A. All applications shall be submitted to the Permit Administrator. 192 012 B. Upon receipt of an application and payment of the nonrefundable application deposit fee, the Permit Administrator shall immediately stamp the application as received on that date. Within 30 days thereafter, the Permit Administrator shall notify the applicant if the application is deemed incomplete. Any subsequent submission shall be deemed a new application. C. Upon receipt of a completed application, the Permit Administrator shall cause an investigation to be made by the appropriate individuals or departments as determined by the Permit Administrator to be necessary for review and investigation of the accuracy of the information contained in the application and compliance with all applicable regulations. D. Each department or division to which the application is submitted by the Permit Administrator shall respond in writing to the Permit Administrator. E. The Permit Administrator shall grant or deny an application for an Original Permit within sixty (60) business days of receipt of a complete application. The Permit Administrator shall grant or deny a Reciprocal Permit or a renewal application within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of a complete application therefor. 5.32.090 Grounds for Denial of Application A. An application for a massage therapy permit shall be denied if the Permit Administrator finds that, in the case of an application for a Reciprocal Permit, the massage therapy permit or off -premises endorsement that the applicant alleges to have been issued by another jurisdiction pursuant to the Coachella Valley Model Massage Ordinance is not valid and/or current. In all other cases, the application shall be denied if the Permit Administrator finds any of the following: (a) The applicant is not eighteen years of age or older; (b) The application contains false information; (c) The applicant did not submit either (i) a diploma or certificate of graduation or equivalent documentation from a Recognized School of Massage that verifies that he or she has obtained the requisite number of hours of massage therapy training; or (ii) therapeutic massage and bodywork credentials issued by the National Certification Board for Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork; (d) The applicant has been convicted of disqualifying conduct; (e) The applicant is required by the California Penal Code to register 193 013 as a sex offender; (f) The applicant has had a massage therapist permit, or a permit or license to operate a massage therapy establishment, denied, revoked or suspended by any entity within five years prior to the date of the application; or (g) The application is incomplete or any required information or document has not been provided with the application. B. If the Permit Administrator denies the application, he or she shall notify the applicant of the denial in writing and state the reason(s) for the denial. C. Any subsequent information submitted to cure the grounds of a denied application shall be treated as a new application. 5.32.100 Issuance of Permit A. The Permit Administrator shall issue the permit if there are no grounds to deny the permit as set forth in this Chapter. B. Except as expressly provided in this Chapter, no person shall perform or offer to perform massage .therapy at any location within the City unless said person has first obtained a massage therapist permit issued pursuant to this Chapter. C. Except as to therapists with an off -premises endorsement, the operator of a massage therapy establishment may only offer massage therapy services performed by a massage therapist to whom a massage therapist permit has been issued by the Permit Administrator. D. A massage therapist permittee shall not perform or offer to perform massage therapy services at any site other than a lawfully operating massage therapy establishment unless the permittee's massage therapist permit includes an off -premises endorsement. 5.32.110 Temporary Permits A. Upon a finding of good cause therefor, the Permit Administrator may issue a temporary permit to any person who possess a valid permit issued by any other governmental entity pursuant to requirements that are similar to those set out in this Chapter, including the training, physical clearance, fingerprinting and background investigation requirements. B. Application for a temporary permit shall be made by written request that 194 014 includes a statement, under penalty of perjury, of the justification for a temporary permit. Said request shall be submitted to the Permit Administrator, together with the following: (a) A certified copy of a valid permit issued by any other jurisdiction; (b) A certified copy of the provisions of the ordinance or other local law pursuant to which the permit was issued by said other jurisdiction; (c) Proof of identification; and (d) A non-refundable application deposit fee of twenty-five dollars ($25.00). C. All temporary permits shall automatically expire thirty (30) days after the date of issuance of the subject temporary permit. The Permit Administrator shall have the discretion to extend the term of any temporary permit an additional thirty (30) days provided that the entire term of the subject temporary permit does not exceed a total period of ninety (90) days. D. The Permit Administrator may condition the issuance of a temporary permit on any additional requirements that he or she deems necessary to assure the purpose and policy of this Chapter is met. 5.32.120 Keeping Application and Ordinance Current A. During the effective duration of the permit, the permittee shall promptly update, correct or supplement the information contained in the application therefor on file with the Permit Administrator when necessary to keep the information contained therein current and accurate. B. Where reference is made herein to any statute or other law, said reference shall include any subsequent amendment or superseding provision thereto. C. The fees and fines and other sums set forth in this Chapter shall be in effect until the City Council or, if authority hereunder has been delegated to another agency, the governing body thereof, shall, by resolution, fix some other rate based upon a cost factor. 5.32.130 Renewal of Permit A. All permits shall expire one year from the date they are issued, except that an off -premises endorsement shall expire concurrently with the corresponding massage therapist permit. 195 0 1 7) B. Applications for renewal of a permit shall be made thirty (30) calendar days prior to the expiration date of the permit. As necessary to update the information contained within the last application or renewal thereof, application for renewal shall be in the same manner as the original application. However, to the extent that the information previously submitted to the Permit Administrator remains current, a statement to that effect shall be sufficient and no further information or documentation shall be required except as follows: (a) Renewal of a Reciprocal Permit: i. Where the applicant seeks to renew a Reciprocal Permit, application for renewal shall include evidence that the underlying massage therapist permit has been renewed by the issuing jurisdiction and that it remains valid and current. ii. For renewal of a Reciprocal Permit, permittee shall pay a non-refundable renewal application deposit fee of ten dollars ($10.00) to help defray the expense of administering this Chapter. iii. A Reciprocal Permit shall not be renewed if the underlying massage therapist permit has expired and has not been renewed, or the underlying permit has been revoked, or is otherwise no longer valid. If renewal of a Reciprocal Permit is denied because the underlying permit is no longer valid, permittee shall submit a complete, original application and comply with all submission requirements set out above for application for an original massage therapist permit. All such applications shall include an explanation of the reason that the Reciprocal Permit is no longer valid. (b) Renewal of Original Permits: i. For renewal of an original massage therapist permit, permittee shall include a current Physician's Certificate, as described above, with his or her renewal application. ii. For renewal of an original massage therapist permit, permittee shall also pay a non-refundable renewal application deposit fee of one hundred dollars ($100.00) at the time of filing the renewal application to help defray the expense of administering this Chapter. 5.32.140 Therapist's Dress and Identification A. During all times that he or she is performing or offering to perform massage therapy services, every massage therapist shall wear a badge that identifies his or her first or last name. Upon receipt of a request or complaint by a patron, the massage therapist shall advise the patron of the full name of 016 the massage therapy establishment through which the massage therapy services were arranged, and the identity of the Permit Administrator through whom the therapist was issued his or her qualifying massage therapist permit. B. All massage therapists shall have in their possession a valid permit issued pursuant to the Coachella Valley Model Massage Ordinance as well as valid identification at all times that he or she is performing or offering to perform massage therapy services within the City. C. All massage therapists shall wear non -transparent outer garments covering all specified anatomical areas while performing or offering to perform any massage therapy services. 5.32.150 Other Prohibited Activities A. It is unlawful for any massage therapist, any patron, or any other person present where massage therapy services are being offered or performed, to expose or touch any specified anatomical areas, whether his or her own, or those of another person. B. It is unlawful for any massage therapist, any patron, or any other person present where massage therapy services are being offered or performed, to be in a state of full nudity or semi -nudity. C. It is unlawful for any massage therapist, any patron, or any other person present where massage therapy services are being offered or performed, to engage in any specified sexual activities. D. No person shall provide or offer to provide any massage therapy services to a minor unless written permission is provided by the minor's parent or legal guardian. E. No permittee shall provide or offer to provide massage therapy services under any name not specified in the qualifying permit. F. No permittee shall provide or offer any alcoholic beverage to a patron during the course of providing or offering to provide any massage therapy service. G. No permittee shall transfer or assign any permit issued pursuant to this Chapter to another person or entity. Any attempted transfer shall result in the automatic termination of said permit. 5.32.160 Permits Issued Pursuant to Superceded Ordinance 1917 017 Provided the massage therapist held a permit validly issued by the City prior to the effective date of this ordinance, and was in compliance with all requirements of the City with respect thereto, said permit holders shall have until the expiration date of said permit, or one year from the effective date of this Chapter, whichever date is earlier, to obtain a permit issued pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter. 5.32.170 Suspension and Revocation of Permit A massage therapist permit and any off -premises endorsement issued pursuant to the Coachella Valley Model Massage Ordinance, or any predecessor ordinance, shall be revoked by the Permit Administrator whom has issued the permit if he or she receives notice that, after administrative proceedings conducted in conformity with the City's Municipal Code, the City has made any of the following findings or determinations with respect to the permittee: A. The massage therapy business or service is conducted in a manner that does not comply with all applicable laws, including but not limited to this Chapter and the City's building, zoning and health regulations. B. The holder of the permit is convicted of any disqualifying conduct or is required to register as a sex offender as set forth in California Penal Code Section 290; C. The permittee fails to notify the Permit Administrator of any update to the information contained in the application that is required to keep the information current; D. Information contained in the approved application is inaccurate; E. Any patron of the permittee contracts any communicable disease during the course of any services offered by the permittee; F. The holder of the permit, or any applicant therefor, refuses to allow representatives of the City or Permit Administrator to inspect business records of the permittee, or any premises utilized by the permittee for massage therapy services; G. The permittee fails to comply with any of the provisions of this Chapter; or H. The holder of the permit has ceased to meet any of the requirements for issuance of the permit. 5.32.180 Appeals A. Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Permit Administrator may file an appeal to the City Council that conforms to the following requirements: (a) All appeals shall be in writing and shall contain the following information: (a) name(s) of the person filing the appeal ("appellants"), (b) a brief statement in ordinary and concise language of the grounds for the appeal; and (c) the signatures of all parties named as appellants and their mailing addresses. (b) A filing fee for an appeal of $100, or other amount as established from time to time by City Council resolution, must be paid to the City at or prior to the time of the filing of the appeal. (c) Any appeal filed that fails to provide all of the information required by this Section and the appropriate filing fee shall be deemed incomplete. (d) A complete and proper appeal of the denial of a permit application shall be filed with the City Clerk within ten (10) calendar days of service of the letter denying the application or within ten (10) calendar days of any other action that is the subject of appeal. B. After receiving the written appeal, the City Clerk shall schedule a public hearing before the City Council at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting for which there is sufficient time to have the matter properly noticed. C. The decision of the City Council shall be final. 5.32.190 Other Remedies A. Any violation of the provisions of this Chapter is unlawful and a public nuisance, subject to abatement, removal or enjoinment thereof in the manner provided by law. B. Any violation of the provisions of this Chapter shall constitute an infraction violation and the violator shall be subject to the imposition of criminal penalties and civil fines. For each separate violation of any provision of this Chapter, the person convicted of such infraction shall be subject to the following fines for each separate violation: (a) a fine in an amount not to exceed two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) for a first conviction of an offense; (b) a fine in an amount not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00) for a second conviction of the same offense within a twelve (12) month period from the date of the first offense; and (c) a fine in an amount not to exceed seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00) for a third conviction of the same offense within a twelve (12) month period from the date of the first offense. The fine for a fourth and subsequent convictions of the same offense within a twelve 19 019 (12) month period of the date from the first offense shall be one thousand dollars ($1,000.00). C. In lieu of issuing an infraction citation, the City may issue an administrative citation, and/or assess an administrative fine consistent with the infraction civil fines set out above, pursuant to any other ordinance within its municipal code. D. Nothing in this section shall preclude the City from issuing an infraction or misdemeanor citation upon the occurrence of the same subject offense on a separate day. E. The remedies provided herein are not to be construed as exclusive remedies and, in the event of violation, the City may pursue any proceedings or remedies otherwise provided by law. 5.32.200 Exemptions The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to any of the following_ A. Any physician, surgeon, chiropractor, osteopath, or acupuncturist duly licensed to practice their respective professions in the state of California, or any nurse or physical therapist working under the supervision thereof, when engaging in any massage therapy practice or activity within the scope of said license. Practical nurses or other persons without qualifications as massage therapists or other persons not duly licensed by the state of California to practice pursuant to the Medical Practice Act, whether or not employed by a physician, surgeon, chiropractor, osteopath, or acupuncturist, may not perform or offer to perform massage therapy without first obtaining a massage therapist permit pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter. B. Any treatment administered in good faith in any course of the practice of any healing art or profession by any person licensed to practice any such art or profession under the Business and Professions Code of the state of California or any other laws of the state of California. C. Barbers, beauticians, manicurists, and pedicurists who are duly licensed under the laws of the state of California, except that this exemption shall apply solely to the massaging of the scalp, face, neck, arms, hands, or feet of the customer or client for cosmetic or beautifying purposes. 5.32.210 Transfer of Permit No massage therapist permit or off -premises endorsement shall be 200 transferable and any attempted transfer shall render the permit null and 020- void. 5.32.220 Massage Establishment Regulations. No person shall own or operate a massage therapy establishment without first obtaining a massage establishment permit. In order to obtain and maintain a massage establishment permit, an inspection by the City must reveal that the establishment complies with each of the following requirements: A. A recognizable and readable sign shall be posted at the main entrance identifying the establishment as a massage establishment; provided, that all such signs shall comply with the sign regulations of the city. B. No person shall give, or assist in the giving of, any massage to any other person under the age of eighteen years, unless the parent or guardian of the minor person has consented thereto in writing. C. Lighting shall be provided in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, and, in addition, at least one artificial light of not less than forty watts shall be provided in each enclosed room or booth where massage services are being performed on a patron. D. Minimum ventilation shall be provided in accordance with the Uniform Building Code. E. Adequate equipment for disinfecting and sterilizing instruments used in performing the acts of massage shall be provided. F. Hot and cold running water shall be provided at all times. G. Closed cabinets shall be provided which cabinets shall be utilized for the storage of clean linen. H. In any establishment in which massage services are rendered only to members of the same sex at anyone time, such persons of the same sex may be placed in a single separate room or the operators of the massage therapy establishment may elect to place such person of the same sex in separate enclosed rooms or booths having adequate ventilation to an area outside the room or booth while massage services are being performed. I. Adequate bathing, dressing, locker, and toilet facilities shall be provided for patrons. A minimum of one tub or shower, one dressing room containing a separate locker for each patron to be served, which locker shall be capable of being locked, as well as a minimum of one toilet and one wash basin shall be provided by every massage establishment; provided, however, that if male and female patrons are to be served simultaneously at the establishment, separate bathing, a separate massage room or rooms, separate dressing and 201 021 separate toilet facilities shall be provided for male and for female patrons J . A separate wash basin shall be provided for each portion of a massage therapy establishment wherein massage services are performed for the individual use of each person performing massage services. The basin shall be provided with soap and hot and cold running water at all times and shall be located within, or as close as practicable, to the area devoted to the performing of massage services. In addition, there shall be provided at each wash basin, sanitary towels placed in permanently installed dispensers. K. All walls, ceilings, floors, pools, showers, bathtubs, steam rooms, and all other physical facilities for the establishment must be in good repair and maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. Wet and dry heat rooms, steam or vapor rooms, or steam or vapor cabinets, shower compartments, and toilet rooms shall be thoroughly cleaned each day the business is in operation. Bathtubs shall be thoroughly cleaned after each use. L. Clean and sanitary towels and linens shall be provided for each patron of the establishment or each patron receiving massage services. No common use of towels or linens shall be permitted. M. It shall be the responsibility of the holder of the massage establishment permit or the employer of any persons purporting to act as massage therapists, to insure that each person employed as a massage therapist has first obtained a valid permit pursuant to this Chapter. 5.32.230 Massage Establishment Permits. A. Any person desiring to obtain a permit to operate a massage therapy establishment shall make application to the Permit Administrator for an investigation. Each application shall be accompanied by a fee in such amount as may have been established by resolution of the City Council to defray the expense of investigation and processing. B. The Director of Building and Safety or his designee shall inspect the premises proposed to be devoted to the massage therapy establishment and shall make a recommendation to the Permit Administrator concerning compliance with the provisions within this Chapter. C. The Permit Administrator shall grant a permit to the establishment if all requirements for a massage therapy establishment described in this chapter are met. D. All permits issued under this chapter are nontransferable. A change of location of a massage therapy establishment will require a new massage establishment permit. 202 022 E. Every person, association, firm or corporation to whom or for which a massage establishment permit has been granted shall display the permit in a conspicuous place so that it may be readily seen by persons entering the premises where the massage, bath, or treatment is given. F. The Director of Building and Safety, fire department, and police department may, from time to time make an inspection of each massage therapy establishment in the City for the purpose of determining that the provisions of this Code are met. G. Any such sale or transfer of any interests in an existing massage therapy establishment or any application for an extension or expansion of the building or other place of business of the massage therapy establishment, shall require inspection and shall require compliance with this chapter. 5.32.240 Revocation and Suspension of Permits Issued Under Prior Chapter 5.32 The following provisions shall apply to massage therapists permits issued prior to October 19, 2001 and to all massage establishment permits regardless of date of issuance: A. A permit issued under authority of this Chapter may be suspended for violation of any of its provisions or for fraud or misrepresentation in the permit application, but no permit shall be revoked until after a hearing has been held before the City Manager or his designee, to determine just cause for the revocation; provided however the Chief of Police may order any permits suspended pending the hearing, and it is unlawful for any person to carry on the business of a massage technician or to operate a massage therapy establishment depending upon the particular type of permit which has been suspended until the suspended permit has be reinstated by the City Manager. Notice of the hearing shall be given in writing and served at least five days prior to the date of the hearing thereon. The notice shall state the ground of the complaint against the holder of the permit, or against the business carried on by the permittee at the massage establishment, and shall state the time and place where the hearing will be had following the five day notice period. B. The notice shall be served upon the permit holder by delivering it to the person or by leaving the notice at the place of business or residence. of the permit holder in the custody of a person of suitable age and discretion. In the event the permit holder cannot be found, and the service of notice cannot be made in the manner provided in this section, a copy of the notice shall be mailed, postage fully prepaid, addressed to the permit holder at his place of business or residence at least five days prior to the date of the hearing. 5.32.250 Violation and Penalty for Permits Issued Under Prior Chapter 5.32 203 023 The following provisions shall apply to massage therapist permits issued prior to October 19, 2001 and to all massage establishment permits regardless of date of issuance: A. Every person, except those persons which are specifically exempted by this Chapter, whether acting as an individual, owner, operator or employee of the operator, or whether acting as a mere helper for the owner, employee or operator, or whether acting as a participant or worker in anyway, who gives massages or conducts a massage therapy establishment or room, or who gives or administers or who practices the giving or administering of steam baths, electric light baths, electric tub baths, shower baths, sponge baths vapor baths, fomentation, sun baths, mineral baths alcohol rubs, Russian, Swedish, or Turkish baths, or any other type of baths, salt flows or any type of therapy or who does or practices any of the other things or acts mentioned in this chapter without first obtaining a permit to do so from the City or violates any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. B. Any owner, operator, manager, or permittee in charge or in control of a massage therapy establishment who knowingly employs a person performing as a massage technician as defined in this chapter who is not in possession of a valid permit or who allows such an employee to perform, operate or practice within such a place of business is guilty of a misdemeanor. C. Any massage therapy establishment operated, conducted, or maintained contrary to the provisions of this chapter shall be and is declared to be unlawful and a public nuisance and the city attorney may, in addition to or in lieu of prosecuting a criminal action under this chapter, commence an action or actions, proceeding or proceedings, for the abatement, removal and enjoinment thereof, in the manner provided by law; and may take such other steps and may apply to such court or courts as may have jurisdiction to grant such relief as will abate or remove the massage establishments and restrain and enjoin any person from operating, conducting or maintaining a massage therapy establishment contrary to the provisions of this chapter. 5.32.260 Severability If any section, subsection or clause of this ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the validity of the remaining section, subsection and clauses shall not be affected thereby. SECTION V. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty days after its adoption. The City Clerk shall within 15 days after the passage of this ordinance, cause this ordinance to be posted in at least three (3) public places designated by 204 02 resolution of the City Council; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of this City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 2001 by the following vote: Ayes: Noes: Abstain: Absent: John J. Pena, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney, City of La Quinta California 205 0 25 APPENDIX A COACHELLA VALLEY MODEL MASSAGE ORDINANCE APPLICATION FOR MASSAGE THERAPIST PERMIT CITY USE ONLY: Date Application Received: Deposit Amount Received By: Check One: APPROVED: 0 DENIED: 0 REASONS FOR DENIAL: IA ARRlicant Information: Legal Name: Last: First: Date Middle: List any alias or other names, including nicknames, you have used or been known by (maiden name, previous married name, etc.): Business Name, if doing business under any name other than legal name shown above: Current Home Address: Mailing Address: Current Business Address, if different than Home Address shown above: Home Telephone: C__) Business Telephone: (_) Fax (___) Date of Birth: Social Security or Tax Identification No.: 1 Scars, tattoo's, or other distinguishing marks: Height: Weight: Color of Hair: Color of Eyes: Sex: n-n-a MASS,4GE THERAPIST PERMIT APPLICATION _ CH Vl; i .1 ". Prior Residences: Please list all of your residences during the past 10 years. Begin with your most current residence: Dates (Mo/Yr) Address of Residence: City, State & Zip Code: From To ❑ If you need additional space, check here and continue on back of this page. Other Permits: 1. Have you ever had a permit, license or other authority for massage services denied, suspended or revoked by any entity? ❑ Yes 0 No. If yes, please explain below: DATE LOCATION REASON FOR DENIAL, SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION 0 If you need additional space, check here and continue on back of this page. 2. Have you ever been a sole proprietor, general partner, officer, director, member or employee of any massage therapy business that has had a permit, license or authority to operate a massage business denied, suspended or revoked by any entity? 0 Yes 0 No. If yes, please explain below: 0 If you need additional space, check here and continue on back of this page. 207 MASSAGE THERAPIST PERMIT APPLICATION PAGE 2 OF 5 Experience & Employment: Beginning with your most current employment, please list all jobs (including part-time, temporary' , and voluntary positions) you have held for the past 10 years. If you have had intervening periods of military service or unemployment, please list those periods in sequence in the spaces provided below. Also include all current and former businesses that you have owned, operated or managed. 1. 2 3. El 61 Employer Name: Address: Phone: Name of Supervisor: Position/Duties: Reason for Leaving:_ Employer Name: Address: Phone: Name of Supervisor: Position/Duties: Reason for Leaving:. Employer Name: Address: Phone: Name of Supervisor: Position/Duties: Reason for Leaving:_ Employer Name: Address: Phone: Name of Supervisor: Position/Duties: Reason for Leaving:. Employer Name: Address: Phone: Name of Supervisor: Position/Duties: Reason for Leaving:_ Dates of Employment — From: To: Check One: Full -Time 0 Part -Time 0 Voluntary ❑ Dates of Employment — From: To: Check One: Full -Time ❑ Part -Time ❑ Voluntary ❑ Dates of Employment — From: To: Check One: Full -Time ❑ Part -Time ❑ Voluntary ❑ Dates of Employment — From: To: Check One: Full -Time 0 Part -Time 0 Voluntary ❑ Dates of Employment — From: To: Check One: Full -Time ❑ Part -Time ❑ Voluntary ❑ ❑ If you need additional space, check here and continue on back of this page. MASSAGE THERAPIST PERMIT APPLICATION 208 PAGE 3OF5 Criminal History: With the exception of minor traffic violations, have you ever been detained, held, arrested, indicted or summoned into court as a defendant in a criminal proceeding; or been convicted, fined, imprisoned, or been placed on probation; ordered to deposit bail or collateral for the violation of any law, police regulation or ordinance? ❑ Yes 0 No If yes, list the date; nature of the offense or violation; name, location, court or place of hearing; penalty imposed or disposition of each case: DATE NATURE OF OFFENSE JURISDICTION DISPOSITION OR VIOLATION ❑ If you need additional space, check here and continue on back of this page. Attachments: Please use the following checklist to show all items attached to this application: ❑ A certified letter of intent to employ from the operator of a massage therapy establishment lawfully operating within the City. Each such letter shall verify that the operator of the massage therapy establishment has reviewed the applicant's qualifications and that the applicant has met the requirements necessary to perform massage therapy at that establishment. ❑ Written evidence that the applicant is at least eighteen years of age. ❑ A certified statement from a physician licensed to practice medicine in the United States that provides that, within 60 days prior to the date of this application, the physician has examined the applicant and has determined that the applicant is free of communicable disease. For purposes of the physician's statement, "communicable disease" means tuberculosis, or any disease, which may be transmitted from a massage therapist to a patron through normal physical contact during the performance of massage therapy services. ❑ Two front -face portrait photographs taken within 30 days of the date of this application, at least two inches by two inches in size. ❑ Applicant's fingerprints taken within the previous sixty (60) days by an agency approved by the City (or Permit Administrator). ❑ A certified copy of the therapeutic massage and bodywork credential issued by the National Certification Board for Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork OR a certified copy of applicant's diploma or certificate of graduation, or equivalent documents, establishing that applicant has successfully completed a course of study for competency as a massage therapist, consisting of at least 300 hours of massage therapy training, offered by a Recognized School of Massage, as defined in the Coachella Valley Model Massage Ordinance. ❑ A nonrefundable application deposit fee of $150.00 (or $100.00 if this is a renewal application). 2 Q MASSAGE THERAPIST PERMIT APPLICATION PAGE 4 ur s �. U##.,� Applicant's Declaration: I, the undersigned applicant, declare: 1. I have read and I am familiar with and understand the provisions of the Coachella Valley Model Massage Ordinance and, if this application is approved, I agree to abide by all such provisions and any revisions that might be passed according to law. 2. I certify that all entries made by me or under my direction in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. I voluntarily consent and authorize the City, its agents, and employees to seek information and to conduct an investigation into the truth of the statements set forth in this application and my qualifications for the permit. 4. I certify that I am not required to register as a sex offender pursuant to the California Penal Code Section 290, or any other law. 5. I certify that, within the last 5 years, I have not been convicted of any of the following conduct: (a) Pandering as set forth in California Penal Code Section 266i; (b) Keeping or residing in a house of ill -fame as set forth in California Penal Code Section 315; (c) Keeping a house for the purpose of assignation or prostitution, or other disorderly house as set forth in California Penal Code Section 316; (d) Prevailing upon a person to visit a place of illegal gambling or prostitution as set forth in California Penal Code Section 318; (e) Lewd conduct as set forth in California Penal Code Section 647, subdivision (a); (f) Prostitution activities as set forth in California Penal Code Section 647, subdivision (b); (g) Any offense committed in any other state which, if committed or attempted in this state, would have been punishable as one or more of the offenses set forth in California Penal Code Sections 266(i), 315, 316, 318, or 647, subdivisions (a) or (b); (h) Any felony offense involving the sale of any controlled substance specified in California Health and Safety Code Sections 11054, 11055, 11056, 11057, or 11058; (i) Any offense committed in any other state which, if committed or attempted in this state, would have been punishable as a felony offense involving the sale of any controlled substance specified in California Health and Safety Code Sections 11054, 11055, 11056, 11057, or 11058; 0) Any misdemeanor or felony offense which relates directly to the practice of massage therapy, whether as a massage therapy business owner or operator, or as a massage therapist; or (k) Any felony the commission of which occurred on the premises of a massage therapy establishment. DATE: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Applicant 210 MASSAGE THERAPIST PERMIT APPLICATION PAGE 5 OF 5 1�O APPENDIX B COACHELLA VALLEY MODEL MASSAGE ORDINANCE SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FOR OFF -PREMISES ENDORSEMENT TO MASSAGE THERAPIST PERMIT CITY USE ONLY: Date Application Received: Deposit Amount Received By: Check One: APPROVED: ❑ DENIED: ❑ REASONS FOR DENIAL: By: Date Applicant Information: Legal Name: Last: First: Middle: Is all of the information contained in your most recent application for a massage therapist permit current and correct? 0 Yes 0 No. If no, please explain below: ❑ If you need additional space, check here and continue on back of this page. 211 SUPPLEMENTAL APPPLICATION FOR OFF -PREMISES ENDORSEMENT TO MASSAGE THERAPIST PERMIT PAGE 1 OFi2 Vi V Attachments: Please use the following checklist to show all items attached to this application: ❑ A copy of applicant's massage therapist permit (unless this supplemental application is being submitted at the same time as an application for a massage therapist permit). ❑ A certified copy of the therapeutic massage and bodywork credential issued by the National Certification Board for Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork OR a certified copy of applicant's diploma or certificate of graduation, or equivalent documents, establishing that applicant has successfully completed a course of study for competency as a massage therapist, consisting of at least 500 hours of massage therapy training, offered by a Recognized School of Massage, as defined in the Coachella Valley Model Massage Ordinance. ❑ A nonrefundable application deposit fee of $50.00. Applicant's Declaration: I, the undersigned applicant, declare: 1. I have read and I am familiar with and understand the provisions of the Coachella Valley Model Massage Ordinance and, if this application is approved, I agree to abide by all such provisions and any revisions that might be passed according to law. 2. I certify that all entries made by me or under my direction in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. I voluntarily consent and authorize the City, its agents, and employees to seek information and to conduct an investigation into the truth of the statements set forth in this application and my qualifications for the permit DATE: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Applicant SUPPLEMENTAL APPPLICATION FOR OFF -PREMISES ENDORSEMENT TO MASSAGE THERAPIST PERMIT PAGE 2 OF 2 Cil?a " 19� 4 44" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: 4_0 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: Consideration of Participation in the Proposed PUBLIC HEARING: Coachella Valley Animal Campus RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: La Quinta's estimated share for the construction costs for the animal campus is $444,000 for a facility sized to hold animals for five days and $535,000 for a facility sized to hold animals for ten days. La Quinta's share of the yearly operational costs for the animal campus are estimated between $56,000 and $70,000 depending on who operates the shelter (Joint Powers Agency employees vs County employees). Currently the City budgets $24,000 annually for animal shelter services which are provided by the County at the Indio shelter. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: CVAG's Human and Community Resources Committee has been discussing the development of a Valley -wide animal campus for approximately one year. The committee commissioned a consultant to prepare a feasibility analysis and to provide alternatives for a multi -jurisdictional animal campus. The consultant's final report is included as Attachment 1. CVAG's Executive Committee has authorized the report to be distributed to the member jurisdictions for consideration of participation in the project. The report includes scenarios where all the Valley jurisdictions participate in the campus, but it also provides a scenario where La Quinta, Coachella, Indio and the County do not participate and continue to utilize the County shelter in Indio for services. The report assumes that a Joint Powers Agency (JPA) would be formed by 2 3 the participating jurisdictions to construct and operate the facility. The Human and Community Resources Committee is recommending that the Indio shelter remain operational even if a new animal campus is built. This issue was discussed during a department report at the July 3, 2001 City Council meeting, the minutes of which are included as Attachment 2. The general consensus of the City Council at that time was to continue to utilize the Indio facility for the City's shelter needs. The consideration and subsequent action on the item before the City Council today will provide CVAG with an official response regarding participation in the proposed animal campus. If the City Council would like to further consider participating in the Valley -wide animal campus, CVAG representatives could be available to make a presentation at a later meeting. Additionally, staff would also conduct a more thorough analysis of the increased costs that would be associated with the new campus. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Indicate to CVAG that the City is interested in participating in the Valley -wide animal campus including joining a Joint Powers Agency and participating in the capital and operational costs associated with the facility; or 2. Indicate to CVAG that the City is not interested in participating in the Valley - wide animal campus and not interested in joining a Joint Powers Agency or participating in the capital and operational costs associated with the facility; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Tom Hartung, Direct r of Building & Safety A ve for submission by: ZZ Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Final Report of Evaluation of Animal Services Campus Alternatives 2. Excerpts from City Council meeting minutes of July 3, 2001 214 Hughes, Perry & Associates MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ATTACHMENT 1 Evaluation of Animal Services Campus Alternatives COACHELI A VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Hughes, Perry & Associates Sea Ranch, California San Mateo, California Final Report July 7, 2001 215 TABLE OF CONTENTS 216 Table of Contents Page Section Title Number Executive Summary E - 1 1. Major Planning Assumptions 1 2. Shelter Capacity Projection Assumptions and Approach 4 3. Shelter Capacity Projections 7 4. Projected Annual Operating Costs for Each Alternative 10 5. Projected Capital Costs for Each Alternative 23 6. Methods for Allocating Capital and Operating Costs 29 Appendix - Space Program and Construction Cost Estimate from the Original CVAG Study 217 Hughes, Perry & Associates EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 218 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR THE EVALUATION OF ANMAL SERVICE CAMPUS ALTERNATIVES STUDY The report which follows provides our evaluation of animal services campus alternatives requested by CVAG. Our study focused on reviewing and evaluating the draft Proposed Animal Campus Study prepared by CVAG and dated April 6, 2001. The study documented in the report which follows had the following principal objectives: • Evaluate and validate facility capacity projections, and adjust them as required. • Evaluate capital cost projections and adjust them as necessary to reflect any modifications in facility size as well as the design, construction and construction cost estimates for developing a joint animal care facility. • Develop and evaluate alternative operating models including refining the multi -tier structure identified in the CVAG report and prepare annual operating cost estimates. • Develop and evaluate alternative cost allocation formulas for both capital and operating costs and illustrate specific impact on potential participating jurisdictions. This executive summary highlights the major findings which are presented in more detail in the main body of the report. 1. MAJOR PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS. Based on discussion with the project steering committee, a series of assumptions were developed and agreed to related to the various combinations of jurisdictions potentially participating in a joint animal campus and program; holding periods for animals; and other issues were developed to support evaluation of alternatives and allocations of costs for facility development and operations. Those assumptions were as follows: • Participating Jurisdictions. Three different scenarios or alternatives were identified to provide a basis for projecting operating and capital costs for shelter and field animal control operations. A "status quo" model which was based on the Valley jurisdictions participating in shelter and/or animal control services as shown in the table which follows on the next page: 219 Hughes, Perry & Associates Page E -1... , Executive Summary for the Joint Animal Campus Evaluation Jurisdiction Partici ating In Shelter Animal Control Palm Desert X X Rancho Mirage X Indian Wells X X La Quinta X Coachella X Indio X Cathedral City X X Palm Springs Not Participating Desert Hot Springs X X Riverside County X The table shown above differs slightly from the configuration originally discussed with the project committee because Riverside County has not been included in the field animal control service. We believe it would not be cost effective for the County to provide contract services to Indio and Coachella, which are not participants for field services in this model, and join the consortium for field services delivery. A "full service" model which would include all jurisdictions participating for both shelter and animal control services. This would include the City of Palm Springs. A "reduced scope" model which would except Indio, La Quinta, and Coachella from participation and would consist of the other jurisdictions participating in shelter and field animal control services as follows: Jurisdiction Partici ating In Shelter Animal Control Palm Desert X X Rancho Mirage X Indian Wells X X La Quinta Not Participating Coachella Not Participating Indio Not Participating Cathedral City X X Palm Springs Not Participating Desert Hot Springs X X Riverside County Not Participating Initially, this alternative was to include Riverside county as a participant. However, it was subsequently determined that it was impractical, under this alternative, to expect Riverside County to participate as a member agency (sharing capital and operating costs for a joint animal services campus) if Indio, La Quinta, and Coachella did not participate because the County would 220 Hughes, Perry & Associates Page E - 2 Executive Summary for the Joint Animal Campus Evaluation probably operate the Indio shelter and field patrol service under this alternative, and there would be no advantage to the County of being a member of the joint animal services program to use the facility and program as a basis for housing animals from the unincorporated area. 2. HELTER CAPACITY PROJECTIONS. The two length of stay assumptions discussed with and agreed to by the committee were then employed to convert intakes to shelter capacity needs for each of the three alternatives. Those holding periods were: Minimum holding period consistent with State law and as described in the next table. Category SB 1785 Specified Holding Period Strays Six business days with the following exceptions: • Four business days if either the shelter is open one weekday evening until 7:00 PM or the shelter is open one weekend day. • The shelter has fewer than three employees. The day of intake is not counted in the holding periods specified above. Owner Surrendered Two business days. Animals Again, the day of intake is not counted in the holding periods specified above. Since the shelter would be open in the evening and on one weekend day, the shorter holding period would apply. Thus, the minimum holding period to calculate shelter capacity would be five days — the four days required by law and the intake day. • A maximum holding period of ten days. Shelter capacity projections for each of the alternatives were developed and are explained in detail in the main body of the report. Capacity projections for each of the three alternatives are as follows: Factor Maximum Five Da Holding Period Maximum Ten Da Holding Period Dos Cats Dos Cats Alternative One - All Agencies Except 84 38 155 76 Palm Springs Shelter Spaces Required 221, Hughes, Perry & Associates Page E-3 Executive Summary for the Joint Animal Campus Evaluation Factor Maximum Five Day Holding Period Maximum Ten Day Holding Period Dos Cats Dos Cats Alternative Two - All Jurisdictions 99 51 183 101 Shelter Spaces Required Alternative Three Reduced Scope 33 15 61 29 Alternative Shelter Spaces Required The shelter capacity projections compare to those contained in the original CVAG planning study as shown in the table which follows below. It should be noted that the comparison is limited to shelter space for dogs because the study (and space program) did not include a specific identification of the number of cats to be accommodated and simply allocated space for a room for cat cages. Projection Number of Shelter Spaces for Dogs 5 Day Maximum Holding Period 10 Day Maximum Holding Period CVAG Study 75 75 Alternative One 84 155 Alternative Two 99 183 Alternative Three 1 33 61 As can be seen from the table, the alternatives identified by the committee differ from the original CVAG study, especially when the longer holding period is incorporated into the assumptions and projections. 3. PROJECTED ANNUAL OPERATING COSTS. To project annual operating costs for each of the alternatives, we developed estimated staffing plans consistent with projected facility capacity, and based on the number of jurisdictions assumed to be participants for shelter and/or field services under each. Costs were projected based on two administrative models: (1) The shelter would be operated for the JPA under contract with Riverside County; and (2) The shelter would be operated by personnel employed directly by the JPA. Basic assumptions for each model and staffing plan were as follows: • Administration: Two basic "models" were employed to estimate administrative staffing requirements: Under one approach, it was assumed that the joint campus and field program would be operated under contract with Riverside County Animal Services. Under an approach which assumed that the campus would be operated by a Joint Powers Agency, it was 222 Hughes, Perry & Associates Page E - 4 Executive Summary for the Joint Animal Campus Evaluation assumed that administrative staff would include a Director and support staff (e.g. Administrative Analyst) who would handle basic accounting, personnel, and other administrative duties which would be required. The number and type of staff assumed for these functions was varied based on the size of the organization (number of staff) projected for each of the alternatives. • Shelter Operations: Staffing assumptions for each operating model were based on providing kennel staff sufficient to provide coverage seven days per week for animal care; and assist with customer service during the six days per week when the kennel would be open to the public. • Field Operations: Were projected based on replicating current service hours as reported by each of the jurisdictions, and based on the assumed number of jurisdictions participating in field services (second tier services) as previously discussed. • Staff Salaries and Benefit Costs. Staffing costs under the County contract assumption were projected based on mid -range compensation for all positions. County benefit costs, as shown in the CVAG feasibility study report, were used to estimate benefit costs. Salaries and benefit costs for the JPA operated program were estimated based on a methodology which projected compensation costs for animal services personnel which were consistent with compensation levels for Coachella Valley cities. The next table shows our estimates of annual operating costs. Program Projected Annual Operating Cost (000) Status Quo Alternative Full Scope Alternative Reduced Scope Alternative County Contract JPA Staffed County Contract JPA Staffed County Contract JPA Staffed Administration* $ 126 $ 357 $ 126 $ 357 $ 101 $ 273 Shelter* 435 529 547 667 299 367 Field* 354 427 901 1085 323 389 Indirect Overhead 128 - 225 - 103 - Total $1043 $1313 $1799 $ 2 109 $ 826 $1029 * Salaries, benefits, and operating expense. Shelter program includes contract veterinary services. As can be seen from review of the information shown in the table and the exhibits, the JPA staffed alternatives are projected to be significantly more expensive than the County contract approach because of differences between Coachella Valley cities' compensation plans and the Riverside 223 County compensation schedule for animal services employees. Hughes, Perry & Associates Page E - 5 v 2 Executive Summary for the Joint Animal Campus Evaluation The main body of the report outlines a methodology for allocating administrative costs to the two major programs — shelter and field services so that a "tiered" service approach could be implemented. The next table shows the costs of the two tiers for each of the alternatives and compares them to the original CVAG study estimate. Alternative County Contract Operation JPA Operation Field Shelter Field Shelter Status Quo $ 582,000 $ 461,000 $ 725,000 $ 588,000 Full Scope 681000 11118,000 803,000 1306 000 Reduced Scope 396 000 430,000 501,000 528,000 Ori ' al CVAG Estimate 3851,6 6 1,168,750 385 366 11168,750 4. PROJECTED CAPITAL COSTS. We reviewed and analyzed the space program and construction budget included in the CVAG Proposed Animal Campus Study, dated April 6, 2001 and also provided as an Appendix to this report. Our findings were as follows: • The basic space program is sound and based on accepted space standards for animal services facilities. We found no need to make major changes in the space program. Adjustments needed were limited to those required to reflect shelter capacity and staffing differences between and among the three alternatives defined by the committee. Those changes were as follows: Adjusted shelter space to reflect the different population levels associated with each of the alternatives since the space program, as outlined in the CVAG report, was predicated on a capacity for holding 72 dogs. Made some limited changes to the administrative spaces outlined in the programs to provide the needed number of work stations consistent with the staffing plans developed for each of the alternatives, and previously described. • The construction cost estimates contained in the CVAG report were reviewed and we found the following: The original construction cost estimate is based on the following per square foot construction costs: .. Administrative space: $ 134 per square foot. .. Clinic space (shell only — to be finished at a later ,Z 2 date): $ 65 per square foot. Hughes, Perry & Associates Page E - 6 Executive Summary for the Joint Animal Campus Evaluation .. Kennel space: $ 130 per square foot. If the unfinished clinic space is excluded, the construction cost estimate reflects an average per square foot cost of $ 131. In our work involving animal care facilities over the last three years, we have found that construction costs for new animal care facilities comparable to the one being considered by the CVAG jurisdictions range from $ 140 to $ 180 per square foot (enclosed kennel space). While the upper end of the range involves development of a "state of the art" facility with expansive public areas and high quality surface finishes, the lower end of the range reflects the type of facility described in the study and as discussed with the committee. As a result, we think it would be prudent to project construction costs at the $ 140 per square foot level rather than the $ 131 per square foot cost employed in the CVAG study. The main body of the report provides detailed estimates of construction and other project development costs for each of the alternatives. Those projected costs are summarized in the next table and also compared to the original CVAG estimate. Alternative Projected Construction and Development Costs Capacity Based on Five Day Holding Period Capacity Based on Ten Day Holding Period Status Quo Alternative $ 5 454 042 $ 6 573 027 Full Scope Alternative 5,828,376 7,182,338 Reduced Scope Alternative 1 4,522,038 4,805,55 [Original CVAG Estimate 1 $ 4 900 631 1 $ 4,900,631 As can be seen from review of the information presented in the. exhibit and the tables, extending the holding period has a significant impact on facility cost — especially for the larger facility alternatives. It should also be noted that facility capacity and resulting facility costs are predicated on housing dogs on a one per kennel basis. We have found that this is a current planning standard for new animal services facilities because individual housing for dogs and cats is reported to reduce spread of illness within shelters, and also limit injuries to both animals and kennel staff. Costs could be reduced by double housing dogs, and that is a policy issue which will need to be addressed as planning for the joint animal campus proceeds. 225 Hughes, Perry & Associates Page E - 7 Executive Summary for the Joint Animal Campus Evaluation 5. COST ALLOCATION APPROACHES. The main body of the report discusses and describes various cost allocation approaches which could be employed to allocate shelter and field service program costs under a tiered approach under which a jurisdiction could select the services (shelter and/or field) in which it would participate. We have recommended that cost allocation formulas for operating and capital costs be structured as follows: We recommend the following approach for allocating operating costs for shelter and field services: • Shelter cost allocation: Base this amount, to the extent possible, on proportional use of the facility by member jurisdictions including potential use and actual use. Illustrative approaches could include: (1) Use of a single cost allocation variable (shelter days used by each jurisdiction) — this approach is currently used by Orange county to allocate costs to participating jurisdictions for their animal services programs; (2) Use two variables like population and shelter days used which would combine potential and actual use; or (3) Use of three variables like population, licensed dogs, and shelter days which combine factors reflecting actual use and potential use of the program. When multiple variables are used, they could be weighted equally or given different weights based on negotiation. We believe the two variable approach best balances use and potential use. Those would be population, and shelter intakes. The allocation of costs could be based on according equal value or weights to both variable, or weighting one variable more heavily than the other. For example, if the policy is that the cost allocation should be more closely related to actual (versus potential) use, then the use variable (intakes) would be more heavily weighted than the population variable. • Field Services. Variables used would depend on services provided by the program. If the program included by both patrol, enforcement and licensing, multiple variables like licensed animals, patrol service hours, and service calls would provide a balanced allocation approach. If the program were limited to field patrol, then target service hours for each participating jurisdiction would provide an allocation method which allocated costs based on actual use. and agreed upon service/coverage levels. The next tables, on the following page, show illustrative cost allocations for each of the alternatives employing the approaches summarized above and explained in more detail in the main body of the report. 226 Hughes, .Perry & Associates Page E - 8 v 1 5 Executive Summary for the Joint Animal Campus Evaluation Program Operated Under Contract By Riverside County Jurisdiction Alternative One Status QMo Alternative Two Full Scope Alternative Three Reduced Scope Shelter Field Shelter Field Shelter Field (Dollars 000) Cathedral City $ 95 $124 $ 96 $ 100 $ 147 $ 116 Coachella 59 - 59 98 - - Desert Hot Springs 41 207 42 167 64 193 Indian Wells 8 6 8 5 12 6 Indio 107 - 108 186 - - La Quinta 56 - 57 167 - - Palm Desert 85 124 85 100 131 116 Palm Springs - - 96 221 - - Rancho Mirage 28 - 28 25 43 - Riverside County 102 - 102 49 - - Program Operated Under Directly By The JPA Jurisdiction Alternative One Status Quo Alternative Two Full Scope Alternative Three Reduced Scope Shelter Field Shelter I Field Shelter Field (Dollars 000) Cathedral City $119 $158 $113 $117 $185 $142 Coachella 73 - 70 115 - - Desert Hot Springs 52 264 49 195 81 237 Indian Wells 10 8 9 6 15 7 Indio 134 - 127 218 - - La Quinta 70 - 67 195 - - Palm Desert 106 158 101 117 166 142 Palm S rin s - - 114 258 - - Rancho Mirage 34 - 33 29 54 - Riverside County 1281 121 57 - - We recommend that the equally weighted variables of population (potential demand); shelter intakes (actual demand); and licensed animals (potential demand) be employed to allocate capital costs between and among participating jurisdictions. Because licensed animals by jurisdiction data are unavailable at this time, two variables (intakes and population) have been employed for illustrative purposes in the capital cost allocations shown in the main body of the report. The table, which follows on the next page, shows construction cost allocation for a facility sized based on a five day maximum holding period for a ten day maximum holding period for each of the alternatives. 227 Hughes, Perry & Associates Page E - 9 lull, Executive Summary for the Joint Animal Campus Evaluation Jurisdiction Alternative One StatusQuo Alternative Two Full Scope Alternative Three Reduced Scope 5 Day Holding Period 10 Day Holding Period 5 Day Holding Period 10 Day Holding Period 5 Day Holding Period 10 Day Holding Period (Dollars 000) Cathedral City $ 725 $ 907 $ 707 $ 872 $ 1 662 $ 1 767 Coachella 425 512 400 493 - - Desert Hot Springs 301 363 283 349 665 706 Indian Wells 66 79 62 76 146 155 Indio 861 1038 809 997 - - La Quinta 444 535 417 514 - - Palm Desert 699 842 657 810 1 544 1,641 Palm Springs - - 701 864 - - Rancho Mirage 229 276 215 265 505 537 Riverside County 1677 2,021 1577 1943 - - 6. REVENUES. The study focused on evaluation of the potential operating and capital costs of a joint animal campus, and did not address or project revenues. It should be noted, that if a JPA is formed, revenues would need to be considered as well as costs. In our experience, it is common practice for most JPA's which provide animal services to record revenues (licenses; fees paid for reclaiming owned animals; etc.) based on the jurisdiction from which those revenues were generated, and then credit those revenues against costs for those jurisdictions. X The main body of the report which follows presents these findings in detail. 228 Hughes, Perry & Associates Page E - 10 FINAL REPORT C 8 EVALUATION OF ANIMAL SERVICE CAMPUS ALTERNATIVES The report which follows provides our evaluation of animal services campus alternatives requested by CVAG. Our study focused on reviewing and evaluating the draft Proposed Animal Campus Study prepared by CVAG and dated April 6, 2001. The study documented in the report which follows had the following principal objectives: • Evaluate and validate facility capacity projections, and adjust them as required. • Evaluate capital cost projections and adjust them as necessary to reflect any modifications in facility size as well as the design, construction and construction cost estimates for developing a joint animal care facility. • Develop and evaluate alternative operating models including refining the multi -tier structure identified in the CVAG report and prepare annual operating cost estimates. • Develop and evaluate alternative cost allocation formulas for both capital and operating costs and illustrate specific impact on potential participating jurisdictions. The report opens with a summary of the major planning assumptions developed to support the analysis. 1. MAJOR PING ASSUMPTIONS. Based on discussion with the project steering committee, a series of assumptions were developed and agreed to related to the various combinations of jurisdictions potentially participating in a joint animal campus and program; holding periods for animals; and other issues were developed to support evaluation of alternatives and allocations of costs for facility development and operations. Those assumptions were as follows: • Participating Jurisdictions. Three different scenariosor alternatives were identified to provide a basis for projecting operating and capital costs for shelter and field animal control operations. 230 e 1 r. Hughes, Perry & Associates Page Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives A "status quo" model which was based on the Valley jurisdictions participating in shelter and/or animal control services as shown in the table which follows on the next page: Jurisdiction Partite ating In Shelter Animal Control Palm Desert X X Rancho Mirage X Indian Wells X X La Quinta X Coachella X Indio X Cathedral City X X Palm Springs Not Partici atin Desert Hot Springs X X Riverside County X The table shown above differs slightly from the configuration originally discussed with the project committee because Riverside County has not been included in the field animal control service. We believe it would not be cost effective for the County to prove de contract services to Indio and Coachella, which are not participants for field services in this model, and join the consortium for field services delivery. A "full service" model which would include all jurisdictions participating for both shelter and anima control services. This would include the City of Palm Springs. A "reduced scope" model which would except Indio, Quinta, and Coachella from participation and would consist of the other jurisdictions participating in shelter and field animal control services as follows: Jurisdiction Partici atinz In Shelter Animal Control Palm Desert X X Rancho Mirage X Indian Wells X X La uinta Not Partici atin Coachella Not Participating Indio Not Participating Cathedral CityX X Palm Springs Not Participating Desert Hot Springs X X Riverside County I Not Participating Initially, this alternative was to include Riverside county as a participant. However, it was subsequently 231 Hughes, Perry & Associates Page 2 �,; 0 Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives determined that it was impractical, under this alternative, to expect Riverside County to parts n member agency (sharing capital and operating costs for a joint animal services campus) if Indio, La Quinta, and Coachella did not participate because the County would probably operate the Indio shelter and field patrol service under this alternative and there would be no advantage to the County of being a member of the joint animal services program to use the facility and program areas a basis for housing animals from the unincorporated • Holding Periods for Animals. Shelter capacity for each of the scenarios was tested based on two holding period assumptions as follows: Minimum holding period consistent with State law. A maximum holding period of ten days. • Veterinary Services. After some discussion, it was agreed that operating cost estimates would include a provision for contract veterinary services. These services were estimated a $ 40 per hour with number of hours varied based on shelter size/animal population levels associated with the three scenarios outlined above. • Shelter Service Hours. It was assumed that the shelter would be open to the public six days per week with service hours as follows: Monday — Friday: 10 AM — 7 PM. Saturday: 8 AM — 3 PM. Staffing coverage and costs were estimated accordingly. • Or ganizational/Governance Models. It was assumed that the Animal Campus program will be organized and managed as a Joint Powers Agency. Operating costs for the JPA will be estimated under two different approaches as follows: With the JPA directly employing staff with representative public sector salaries and fringe benefits in the Coachella Valley employed to estimate costs. With the JPA contracting with Riverside County to staff and operate the shelter and field animal control program. 23'' Page 3 Hughes, Perry & Associates r� Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives • Construction Management. For the purposes of the analysis, it was assumed that a contract construction manager would be retained to oversee and manage construction of the facility. 2. SHELTER CAPACITY PROJECTION ASSUMPTIONS AND APPROACH. Major steps employed to project shelter capacity for each of the alternatives were as follows: • Animal intakes reported for each of the potential participating jurisdictions were employed as the basis for projecting shelter populations. Intake data are based on calendar year 2000 experience. The table which follows shows total for dogs ntreviou g and cats for each of the shelter alternativespreviously described. Alternative One Alternative Two Alternative Three Jurisdiction Intakes Intakes Intakes Dos Cats Dos Cats Dos Cats Desert Hot Springs 1077 339 1077 339 1077 339 Not Participating Coachella 523 139 523 139 807 396 Not Participating Indio Palm Springs 807 396 Not Participating Not Participating 1053 785 Not Participating La Quinta 633 229 470 633 229 470 946 470 946 Cathedral 946 city Rancho 52 53 52 53 52 53 Mirage 6 11 6 11 6 Indian Wells 11 195 239 195 239 195 Palm Desert 239 Unincorp. Not Participating Riverside County 1658 520 1658 520 TOTAL SAKES b 946 2 347 6 999 3132 2 325=11063 • Intake data were reviewed to identify disposition of intakes for both dogs and cats to determine the number of animals reclaimed by owners; number adopted; and number euthanlzed. Alternative dispositions need to be considered because we haveowner found, in our previous work with other jurisdictions, that own claimed animals are typically held significantlyless time than animals which are ultimately adopted or euthanized. Review of 2000 patterns for the various reporting CVAG jurisdictions indicated that disposition patterns by species were as shown the table which follows on the next page: 233 Hughes, Perry & Associates Page 4 " +0 w., Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives Disposition Dos Cats Ado ted Returned to Owner Euthanized TOTAL 15.1% 15.3% 19.6% 65.3% 100.00/0 2.6% 82.1% 100.0% • Our experience in working with other jurisdictions and review of monthly intake patterns for Palm Springs, Riverside County Animal control — Indio, and Animal Care indicates that intakes also fluctuate by species in the Coachella Valley. As intakes fluctuate, shelter populations will also fluctuate and thus, capacity planning needs to accommodate those . ntakevo lume ins to avoid chronic overcrowding during highershelter population periods. To estimate an allowance forsheP P fluctuation, we accomplished the following: Analyzed intake volume by month, by species for the most recent twelve months available. Calculated average monthly intakes for the period. Calculated fluctuations above and below the average for each month. Took the annual average for each monthly fluctuation to calculate a planning allowance for estimating shelter capacity which accommodates animal population fluctuations in the shelter. The adjustments calculated were as follows: .. Dogs:9.7% .. Cats: 20.1% Then, these adjustments were applied to intakes to adjust for population fluctuation impact on shelter capacity needs. • The two length of stay assumptions discussed with and agreed to by the committee were then employed to convert intakes to shelter capacity needs for each of the three alternatives.Those holding periods were: Minimum holding period consistent with State law. The provisions of SB 1785 and subsequent legislation are as described in the table which follows on the next page: 234 Hughes, Perry & Associates Pages �r'3 Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives Category SB 1785 Specified Holding Period Strays Six business days with the following exceptions: • Four business days if either the shelter is open one weekday evening until 7:00 PM or the shelter is open one weekend day. • The shelter has fewer than three employees. The day of intake is not counted in the holding periods specified above. Owner Surrendered Two business days. Animals Again, the day of intake is not counted in the holding periods specified above. Since the shelter would be open in the evening and on one weekend day, the shorter holding period would apply. Thus, the minimum holding period to calculate shelter capacity would be five days — the four days required by law and the intake day which needs to be included in the calculation because animals would occupy shelter space shortly following intake. A maximum holding period of ten days. Detailed data related to holding periods of animals by disposition are not available. However, in our work with other jurisdictions we found that: Owner re-claimed animals are typically held for shorter periods than adopted or euthanized animals. Adopted animals average holding periods which generally exceed the five and ten day periods identified by t he committee for capacity planning assumptions. Euthanized animals would stay for the maximum holding period. For the purposes of the capacity projections for each of the alternatives, we have assumed that the length of stay patterns for owner reclaimed animals as documented in our recent work for other jurisdictions will be used for CVAG to avoid overstating capacity needs by applying the same length of stay to a ll intakes. Data from Santa Clara County and Orange County indicated that holding periods for owner re-claimed dogs and cats were similar. These data have been employed for 13 ra Page 6 Hughes, Perry & AssociatesZe ,_,, Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives analysis and are as follows: Owner Returned Dogs and Cats — Average length of stay of 3.5 days. Given the assumptions described above, capacity for each of the alternatives were calculated as follows: • Annual intakes by species were multiplied by the fluctuation adjustment factor. Then, adjusted intakes, by species, were multiplied by the owner returned factor to estimate the proportion of animals which would be returned to owners and have a shorter stay and the proportion which would stay for the specified maximum holding period. • Once intakes were separated by disposition, each category of disposition was multiplied by average shelter days per intake and totaled to estimate total annual shelter days by species. • The resulting totals were divided by 365 to calculate average daily shelter population for each alternative to include the adjustment for population fluctuations. The next section shows shelter capacity needs projected based on the approach and assumptions described above. 3. SHELTER CAPACITY PROJECTIONS Shelter capacity projections for each of the alternatives are as follows: Alternative One All Agencies Except Palm Springs Factor Maximum Five DaY Holding Period Do s Cats Maximum Ten Day Holding Period Dogs Cats Intakes Including Adjustment Factor 6 523 2,347 6.523 2 347 Number Owner Redeemed 1305 85 1305 85.. Number Held for Maximum Period 5 218 2.734 5 218 2,734 Projected Shelter days for Owner Redeemed 4 568 298 4 568 298 Projected Shelter Days Others 26 090 13,670 52180 27 340 Total Annual Shelter Days 30,748 13,968 56,748 27,638 (Total shelter Days Divided by 365) 84 38 155 76 Shelter Spaces Rewired 236 -, r> Hughes, Perry & Associates Page 7 Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives Factor Intakes Including Adjustment Factor Number Owner Redeemed Number Held for Maximum Period Projected Shelter days for Owner Redeemed Projected Shelter Days Others Total Annual Shelter Days (Total shelter Days Divided by 365) Shelter Spaces Required Alternative Two All Jurisdictions Maximum Five Da Holding Period Maximum Ten Day Holding Period Dos Cats Dos Cats 7,678 3 762 7,678 3,762 1536 113 1536 113 6.142 3 649 6,142 3,649 376 396 5,376 396 710 18,245 61420 36 49 36,086 I 18,641 I 66,796 I 36,886 99 1 51 183 101 Alternative Three Reduced Scope Alternative Maximum Five Da Holdin Period Maximum Ten Da Holdin Period Factor Dos Cats Dos Cats Intakes Including Adjustment Factor 2,551 1063 2 551 1063 Number Owner Redeemed 510 32 510 32 Number Held for Maximum Period 2,041 1031 2 041 1031 Projected Shelter days for Owner Redeemed 1785 112 1 785 112 Projected Shelter Days Others 10 205 5 155 20,410 10,310 Total Annual Shelter Days (Total shelter Days 11,990 5,267 22,195 10,422 Divided by 365) Shelter Spaces Required 33 15 61 29 The shelter capacity projections compare to those contained in the original CVAG planning study as shown in the table which follows on the next page. It should be noted that the comparison is limited to shelter space for dogs because the study (and space program) did not include a specific identification of the number of cats to be accommodated and simply allocated space for a room for cat cages. 237 Page Hughes, Perry & Associates , Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives Projection CVAG Study Alternative One Alternative Two Alternative Three Number of Shelter Spaces for Dogs 5 Day Maximum Holding Period 10 Day Maximum Holding Period 75 75 84 155 99 183 33 61 As can be seen from the table, the alternatives identified by the committee differ from the original CVAG study, especially when the longer holding period is incorporated into the assumption and projection. As previously noted, current law requires that owner surrendered animals need be held only two business days before being euthanzzed. Since we assume that one of the principal objectives of developing a new animal campus and program would be to reduce euthanizing of animals, capacity projections have been based on the five and ten day holding period assumption, including the assumption that owner surrendered animals, unless sick or injured, would be held for the maximum period if not adopted or reclaimed prior to the end of the maximum period. For informational purposes, we did estimate the impact of a reduced holding period (to that consistent with State law, as follows: While we did not have complete data on owner surrendered animals as a proportion of total indicates, we have found from our work with other jurisdictions that owner surrenders generally account for about 30% of total intakes. • If this assumption is applied to the Coachella Valley alternatives, impact on projected shelter capacity needs for dogs under the five day holding period assumption as shown in t he table which follows on the next page: 238 Hughes, Perry & Associates _ Page 9 v 1* 1 7 Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives Factor Status Quo Full Scale Reduced Scope Alternative Alternative Alternative Intakes 5.946 6 999 2 325 Owner Surrendered 2.100 697 at 30% Other Intakes ,899 - 4 1,628 Projected Holdin Da s :: Owner Surrendered 3 568 4.200 1 394 at 2 Days Reclaimed by Owners — 20% of 2,912 3,430 1,140 Other Intakes and 3.5 days Held for Maximum Five Da Period 16 650 19 595 6.510 Sub -Total Annual Shelter Days for 23 130 27 225 9.044 Dos Total Annual Projected Shelter Days Including Adjustment for Population 25 374 29 866 9.921 Fluctuations Divided by 365 to Project Capacity Needed If Owner Surrendered Animals Held for 2 Days and Other fora ?0 82 27 Maximum of 5 Days Capacity'Projected If All Animals Held for 99 33 Maximum of 5 Days 84 As noted above, operating cost and facility projections have been based on five and ten day holding assumptions for all animals not reclaimed or adopted prior to that time. If the shorter holding period for owner surrendered animals is subsequently determined to be an appropriate policy, capacity projections can be modified accordingly. 4. PROJECTED ANNUAL OPERATING COSTS FOR EACH ALTERNATIVE. To project annual operating costs for each of the alternatives, we developed estimated staffing plans consistent with projected facility capacity, 239 Page 10 Hughes, Perry & Associates Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives and based on the number of jurisdictions assumed to be participants for shelter and/or field services under each. Basic assumptions for each model and staffing plan were as follows: • Administration: Two basic "models" were employed to estimate administrative staffing requirements: Under one approach, it was assumed that the joint campus and field program would be operaed under and contract with Riverside County Animal Services, based on discussion with County representatives, that an on -site manager at the Operations Chief level would be provided to manage the operation. Under a County contract service situation, all support services (personnel, payroll, accounting, information services, etc.) would provided by the County and covered by indirect service charges. Under the approach which assumed that the campus would be operated by a Joint Powers Agency, it s a assumed that administrative staff would include Director and support staff (e.g. Administrative Analyst) who would handle basic accounting, personnel, and other administrative duties which would be required. The number and type of staff assumed for these functions was varied based on the size of the organization (number of staff) projected for each of the alternatives. Under both approaches, it was assumed that the organization would staff a Volunteer Coordinator position with time commitment varying based on program size. • Shelter Operations: Staffing assumptions for each operating model were based on providing kennel staff sufficient to provide coverage seven days per week for animal care; and assist with customer service during the six days per week the kennel would be open to the public (e.g.. moving animals; receiving animals; etc). The number of staff required to cover positions was estimated based on 2,080 gross hours per position per year; net availability to work after leaves are considered of 85% (typical availability for public sector employees); and a net of 1,768 work hours per position. Exhibit I, which follows this page, shows how we assumed that kennel staff would be deployed under each alternative. We also assumed that kennel operations would be directed by a Kennel Supervisor who would also provide coverage as required to back-up other staff. 24n ' tes Page 11 � ti Hughes, Perry & Associates •> i t W wt w ^ W �J r -�1 : � o r♦ ' PC v /•RV rid y v t .,4 > rid ;.1 .0 r-i rl '"d N N .--� it 'd � w o O 0 o � a~ W Q = •' a o ca 10 �o { r-Ir� N CV r� r�-4 ri r-i r-i w, C ..( ^cd O j .. vl -''�^^ W f� r-� T-� O Cq C4 ri M a Co o a cq x o 1-4 O N o r-1 r•1 r-i N N : O ` U D O O CO.� O ,^ � � O O � 3 3 3 Q" a ro �r r{ r-I 1 r iU)r Gil N O O A G O �$4 i+ o O N y o C M U a� o U U r N rn ° .o�a P4 1-4 a1--4 E �� O�"'na 4.)l o O OW wcvn w a 4) > CLrh , a o 00 4 c.6Q 1 �, �, ; I�O 0 E-, a o o � o -�A r, 4)�'� � o , a wz � N � a F' M00r--,a�,vi� GQr+aG�� oioo 24 Page 12 C 1 0 Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives Each alternative also assumed that a Veterinary Technician would be assigned to the shelter under each alternative and would handle intake examination; basic treatment; and euthanizations. Under the reduced scope alternative, it was assumed that, because of the reduced facility size, one of the Kennel Technician positions would be filled by a Veterinary Technician who would have dual responsibilities. Kennel operations under each alternative provide for Public Services staff (at the Office Assistant Level) who would provide counter service; process adoptions and owner surrenders; and other comparable services. Staffing needs in this category were determined under the same approach as that taken to estimate Kennel Technician staffing needs based on scheduled coverage given assumed Shelter public service hours. It was also assumed that Public Service staff would also support field operations (dispatch; licensing processing; etc.), and positions were allocated between the two programs (shelter and field) under the tiered approach suggested by the committee. • Field Operations: Were projected based on replicating current service hours as reported by each of the jurisdictions, and based on the assumed number of jurisdictions participating in field services (second tier services) as previously discussed. The next table provides our understanding of current annual service hours of field patrol for each of the jurisdictions which are potential participants in each of the alternatives Field Patrol Services Currently Provided By Current Level of Field Patrol Coverage Jurisdiction Palm Desert Provided under contract with California Animal Care. 6 hours per day, 354 days per year. 2,124 hours per year of annual coverage. Rancho Mirage Provided under contract with California Animal Care. 10 hours of patrol per week. 520 hours per year of annual Indian Wells coverage.____ Provided under contract with California Animal Services. 2 hours per week or 104 hours per year of annual coverage. La Quinta Provided by in-house City staff. 2 positions allocated to field patrol. Assume 2,080 gross work hours per year per position, and once vacation, sick, and other leaves are considered (estimated at 85% - average for most public agencies), net availability to work in the field would be 1,768 net work hours per position. Hughes, Perry & Associates Page 13 2 4 ? Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives Jurisdiction Field Patrol Services Current Level of Field Currently Provided By Patrol Coverage With two positions dedicated to La Quinta field patrol, this would (continued) represent 3,536 total field patrol hours annually or about 68 average erson hours er week. Coachella Provided by the City. Contract for Noted in response as 40 hours week, or 2,080 hours of with Riverside County per Shelter Services. coverage annuall Indio Provided under contract by 3,952 hours per year or 76 hours Riverside Count -Per week. Cathedral City Provided under contract with 6 hours per day, 354 days per 2,124 hours per year of California Animal Care. year. annual coverage. Palm Springs In-house animal control 80 to 100 hours per week. For purposes of this analysis, will program. assume 90 hours per week or 4,680 person hours of field patrol annually. Desert Hot Springs Provided by in-house staff with 2 positions allocated to field two positions currently patrol. Assume 2,080 gross authorized. work hours per year per position, and once vacation, sick, and other leaves are considered (estimated at 85% - average for most public agencies), net availability to work in the field would be 1,768 net work hours per position. With two positions dedicated to field patrol, this would represent 3,536 total field patrol hours annually or about 68 average erson hours er week. Riverside County County staff working out of the Animal The four animal control staff serve both Indio and Coachella Indio shelter. control staff include 1 AC Supv and 3 and the unincorporated area. ACO's. They provide coverage Assuming the four staff have 2,080 work hours each from Monday to Friday from 7:30 am to 4:30 PM. gross annually; and net availability to M and F - 2 deployed work of 85% (1,768 net work T,W,Th - 3 deployed. hours annually), the four positions would have 7,072 total They provide coverage for Indio work hours annually to serve and Coachella under contract, Coachella, Indio, and the and also serve the surrounding unincorporated area. Since unincorporated area with these Coachella and Indiocontract for staff. hours a total of 6,032 y as noted above, this would leave a net of 1,040 hours per year to cover the uninconporated area. 293 , Hu hesPerry & Associates - Page 14 g Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives These data were employed to estimate field patrol staffing needs as shown in the next table: Staffing for field services was projected based on providing a field patrol supervisor for each alternative, and under the Status Quo and Reduced Scope alternatives, it was assumed that the supervisor would also provide field patrol services on a part-time basis. The field services staffing component for each alternative also included staffing for dispatch and licensing by PublicService Technician type positions, and varying number of Licensing Inspectors based on the number of jurisdictions assumed to be participating in the field services related service components. It should be noted that the original CVAG study projected a two tier system which was structured as follows: • Tier One would include basic shelter operations including animal housing, adoptions, treatment, euthanasia, public education, and a volunteer program. • Tier Two would include field patrol, licensing, enforcement of animal related laws and ordinances, and investigations. 244 Hughes, Perry & Associates Page 15 ( 30 Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives We found that this was a logical separation of services and have employed the same basic service delineation to estimate operating costs in this study. Once staffing plans were developed, annual operating costs for each were determined under both operating assumptions (County contract and JPA staffed and operated). Basic assumptions employed to project costs were as follows: • Staff Salaries and Benefit Costs. Staffing costs under the County contract assumption were projected based on mid -range compensation for all positions. County benefit costs, as shown in the CVAG feasibility study report, were used to estimate benefit costs. Salaries and benefit costs for the JPA operated program were estimated as follows: Compensation data for the Coachella Valley cities for several common positions (e.g. planner, office assistant, accountant, etc.) and where authorized, animal control positions were obtained. These data were then analyzed to determine proportional relationships between the animal services series and the other common classifications. Data were adjusted to estimate "average" compensation for the non -animal control series positions in the Coachella Valley jurisdictions surveyed. Then, based on the proportional relationships between animal control positions and the other common positions, a salary level (at mid -step) for an animal control officer' was estimated. This salary level assumed that the JP would compensate staff at a level consistent with compensation patterns for Valley cities. Then, the proportional relationships between the animal control officer level and other animal services positions we have documented in other jurisdictions with full service animal control and service programs were employ to estimate salary ranges for the other animal service positions. 245 Hughes, Perry & Associates Page 16 U Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives All salaries were projected at mid -range. • Annual Operating Expense. Estimated as 25% of staffing costs based on relationships between staffing costs (salaries plus benefits) we have documented in our work with other animal services agencies. • County Indirect Overhead. Projected for the County contract model based on calculations developed in our analysis of the previous CVAG feasibility report which indicated that the previous cost estimates for Tier One and Tier Two services included County indirect charges for accounting/payroll, personnel/human resource services, and information systems support averaged 18.4% of salary and benefit costs. • Veterinary Services. It was assumed that these services would be provided by a private veterinarian on contract at $ 40 dollars per hour as previously discussed with the committee. Service hours were varied based on shelter population levels/capacity. Exhibits II, III, and IV, which follow this page show projected annual operating costs developed based on the capacity, staffing, and cost assumptions previously described. The data shown in the exhibit indicate that the projected annual cost of each alternative would be as follows: Projected Annual Operating Cost (000) Program Status Quo Alternative Full Scope Alternative Reduced Scope Alternative County Contract $126 JPA Staffed $ 357 County Contract $126 JPA Staffed $ 357 County Contract $101 JPA Staffed $ 273 Administration* Shelter* 435 529 547 667 367 Field* 354 427 901 1085 323 389 Indirect Overhead 128 - 225 - 103 - Total $1043 $1 313 $1 799 $ 2 109 $ 826 $1 029 * Salaries, benefits, and operating expense. Shelter program includes contract veterinary services. As can be seen from review of the information shown in the table and the exhibits, the JPA staffed alternatives are projected to be significantly more expensive than the County contract approach because of differences between Coachella Valley cities' compensation plans and the 246 Page 17 Hughes, Perry & Associatea H O N O a0 O ~ CS .r O tOo O O '� -S .� N oO0 M C� COD C� N d O E N cq dt O 00 O o 00 O O N N �' to �' i'+ p� o O M N .-1 [- M N N N d' i+ w a) O U CO 0 0 0 0 to m C O co .� co .� O Q w N CD CO N M O CODS O(M o Cl - M O a ooN0t- occoaoO ocit000 O•r+ to co N M � N CO N M It N N N O C U 0 qq 6 b as y v 0 r-1 r-I r-1 r-4 r-I t.to r-I .� d' N fN r4 CR Pr N o 0 N O O O t- Co o O �� c� Ma, ti aOo O o 0°00„ r� N O co r-1 d' 00 r4 N O to U) N r 4 Ld 40 CD � N d' .� r-�I r� a0 00 O CD N N CD .0 CO co co O to O O N C+' N co COCA iNo tOow t- � to [ L G c0 to a 6= cr) CO O M -4 •� CD O M '. a0 N& M N N N N yarn `, M Nlf� N N N N e03 a $4 0 x w o� U bD r-1 v N N C+7 O *-t ()0 N *� O r-I M of pN o � o U c t~ 00 O co *� o w �x Cd �bo N Lo " w " Cd C: U3 cn ° 0 0 v rn co a a v U o ' cs v > � � coi < q v .cOi � W V > agar: �°U•� pa o '� o o no E. od 0 a go>Cn P, rn v,Aaaacnv�cau� o�UH : 247 Page 18 �' > tE-1 C7 L` Lo O CD O ►O[� t- 00 Lo GOO C co 0�0 000 000 Loo 00 M O O O O CA ch m N N m CG M CD r-+ aC N V L' It CC N C M r+ d' et' 00 CD v O N CO to d' Cl) r-4 Ne O t1� M N O CO 6� C Lam' co [� rl 196-1 E � .� r-1 Cr*i ti w 0 U t4 +' qtr t- ►o O CD N CD et' CO t` CD CD N to O Co q o Ln O r4 to ri 8 Lo N N co cq N N Co rl m O m f+ O m cri N M O CD O O) N N M N N O a ••+ Gi CO aD GO O a to a L C) CD C) O N O MM Ef3 Q N N N CDLO M N M NE& N co N M a �a a PC 4) 4 r� rl rl r-i N cq M LO M a o L c- o to oo O O O N 'C44 1IS CM Lo M m L 4 00 N d' M '0 CD 00 d; co 1-1 um er r-i r-4 cq to Lo 00 Co-N LO M COD N CND N CM N d, 00 N � M �} M � cocq M O Co N N 0 Co .Cr M 00 O N M M CO to Lo Co O M CV N CA � Lw r'� LO r-1 L w m Co a p M r-i OD N L M C; CD O M a, CO ENi3 M N N N 4& M N N N N O to U 0 w rn O o � U y} r,4 0 0 0 O er r- -4 4 N cq M O M � q +3 � o cn 3 aa°a � 5 r' o 0-00 csx CS N i. O ya LL0 d y N .0 Q $+ ~CS O M C.O 9 O G1 1-4 UJ 0-4 ��V•a�r'� �tnE� a UdU. of o 24$ Page 19 ;� j, as o to ao �rto co Mac oo p H C� N O CO Cl M tp .-� COVCh C� 00 CO O N 00 Ch M N L ^ 00 O r- 00 co O to +�i �', D LO' N to N � 03 LO N N � N p d o, ca 0 U r- to CO N CO `d' 00 r- CO M to O co d' to r1 CO co cqM O COOS O 04 N N r0-1 M O Q� O Ct Q; CO 00 00 O O N to O CO a •^� CO LO N M C4 N M N CO v M N N N it �3 a �a O es 0 qq a b Itt .-1 r-I r 4 t0 00 N O CO rl N r-1 r-1 d' N M 6 p .o O a N p p N M OO N tp 'No CS O r- dN' MM OMO cz 00 to p Op tl� to CV 00-00 � O G � I O to to 0o to M O v � LON d' Mlf� O sr N O N 4 C9 g 0� ■C 00 co O co N N CD 00 00 Rp it00 CD LO N t0 r- C+M LO co O LO N d O CO to 10 L - r-1 tf� L w Ct CO L ►w a- CO O c rl 00 N to M CO O M C �V M � N N N N N N N N O V3 0 0 x �a ro 0 U � LO O CO rl N r1 r1 d' N CN eN q cs O O N p p �� v Ca 0C/I3 c�a c6 �o cm N cs E ti R � .� e t, & .o O a U co o d o o o d a, pa e» k o �' Vl co a C E 'a 'm C) � E i t H a�'a to�. 6 .+ r A :+ . it +a plos AdoDrn ac x�x��CD C/2 wwcaus OUE� 24`� Page 20 Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives Riverside County compensation schedules for animal service personnel. To estimate the fully "loaded" cost of "tiered" services which can be employed to allocate tier or program costs to participating jurisdictions later in this report, these data were used as follows: • The two principal tiers employed in the analysis are shelter and field services. Shelter services include kennel operations, animal care and feeding, public service counter operation related to turn -ins, adoptions, and the like. Field services include field patrol, dispatch, licensing, and licensing enforcement. • Administrative costs (Director/Operations Chief, other support staff such as administrative and accounting personnel, and the Volunteer Coordinator need to be allocated to both tiers since they support both programs. The most practical basis for allocation is the proportional relationship between the two tiers. In the County contract example, the indirect/overhead charges would also be allocated in this fashion. The tables which follow on the next page show the estimated cost of the two tiers for each of the alternatives based on total cost projections shown in detail in Exhibits II through IV and the allocation methodology noted above. 250 Page 21 Hughes, Perry & Associates I „ Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives County Contract Operation Status Quo Full Scope Reduced Scope Factor Alternative Alternative Alternative Dollars Percent Dollars Percent Dollars Percent- (000) (000) (000) Shelter Program Costs $ 435 58% $ 547 38% $ 299 48% Field Service Program Costs 354 42% 901 62% 323 52% Total $ 747 100% $1 448 100% $ 622 100% Administration Costs $126 allocated based $126 allocated based $101 allocated based Allocated Based on on percentages noted on percentages noted on percentages noted the Percentages above: above: above: Noted Above Shelter: 58% = $73 Shelter: 38% = $48 Shelter: 48% = $48 Field: 42% =$53 Field: 62 % =$ 78 Field: 52% =$ 53 Indirect Costs $128 allocated to $225 allocated to $103 allocated to Allocated Based on based on percentages based on percentages based on percentages the Percentages noted above: noted above: noted above: Noted Above Shelter: 58% = $74 Shelter: 38% = $86 Shelter: 48% = $49 Field: 42% =$54 Field: 62% =$139 Field: 52% =$54 Tier or Program Costs with Allocated Management and Overhead Shelter $582 $681 $396 Field 461 1,118 430 -Program Total $19043 $1 799 $826 The table which follows on the next page shows the same allocations for a program directly organized and staffed by a JPA. JPA Operation Status Quo Full Scope Reduced Scope Factor Alternative Alternative Alternative Dollars Percent Dollars Percent Dollars Percent (000) (000) (000) Shelter Program Costs* $529 55% $667 38% $367 49% Field Service Program Costs* 427 45% -1085 62% 389 51% Total $956 100% $1752 100% $756 100% Administration Costs $357 allocated based $357 allocated based $273 allocated based Allocated Based on on percentages noted on percentages noted on percentages noted the Percentages above: above: above: Noted Above Shelter: 55% = $196 Shelter: 38% = $136 Shelter: 49% = $134 Field: 45% =$161 Field: 62 % =$221 Field: 51% =$139 Tier or Program Costs with Allocated Mana ement Shelter $725 803 $501 Field 588 1306 528 Program Total $1 313 $2 109 $1029 251 Hughes, Perry & Associates rage zz �40 Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives Operating costs as projected in the previous tables compare to the original CVAG estimate as follows: Alternative Status Quo Full Scope Reduced Scope Original CVAG Estimate County Contract O eration Field Shelter $ 582,000 $ 461,000 681000 1,118,000 396,000 430,000 385,366 1,168,750 JPA Operation Field Shelter $ 725 000 $ 588 000 803,000 11306,000 501 000 528,000 385,366 1,168,750 Methods for allocating these program or tier costs will be discussed later in this report. 5. PROJECTED CAPITAL COSTS FOR EACH ALTERNATIVE.. We reviewed and analyzed the space program and construction budget included in the CVAG Proposed Animal Campus Studv, dated April 6, 2001 and also provided as an Appendix to this report. Our findings were as follows: • The basic space program is sound and based on accepted space standards for animal services facilities. Thisincludes . the number and types of spaces included in the preliminary space program, the standards employed to project space needs by function, and the space allocations by use/function for both internal and external spaces. We found no need to make major changes in the space program. Adjustments needed were limited to those required to reflect shelter capacity and staffing differences between and among the three alternatives defined by the committee. Those changes were as follows: Adjusted shelter space to reflect the different population levels associated with each of the alternatives since the space program, as outlined in the CVAG report, was predicated on a capacity for holding 72 dogs. Made some limited changes to the administrative spaces outlined in the programs to provide the needed number of work stations consistent with the staffing plans developed for each of the alternatives, and previously described in Section 4 of this report. 25� Hughes, Perry & Associates Page 23 U4 Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives The table which follows summarizes the adjustments made to the space program. Space Type Status Quo Alternative Full Scope Alternative Reduced Scope Alternative Administrative Add three additional Add seven additional Delete one work Space work stations and work stations and station and circulation factor circulation factor associated circulation totaling an totaling an factor and reduce additional 600 additional 1,400 administrative space square feet. square feet. projection by 200 square feet. Kennel Space Add from 12 to 83 Add from 27 to 111 Reduce dog kennel additional dog additional dog space from that kennel spaces based kennel spaces based projected in the on the five and ten on the five and ten CVAG report as day maximum day maximum follows: holding period holding period assumptions. Adds assumptions. Adds • For the five day 912 square feet to 2,052 square feet to holding period the kennel for the the kennel for the assumption, reduce five day holding five day holding kennel space by 39 period assumption, period assumption, kennels and 2,964 and 6,308 square feet and 8,436 square feet square feet. for the ten day for the ten day maximum holding maximum holding • For the ten day period assumption. period assumption. holding period assumption, reduce For the more For the more kennel space by 11 extended ten day extended ten day kennels and 836 holding period, add holding period, add square feet. 75 additional square 250 additional feet to the cat room. square feet to the cat room. • The construction cost estimates contained in the CVAG report were reviewed and we found the following: - The original construction cost estimate is based on the following per square foot construction costs: .. Administrative space: $ 134 per square foot. .. Clinic space (shell only — to be finished at a later date): $ 65 per square foot. .. Kennel space: $ 130 per square foot. 253 Hughes, Perry & Associates Page 24 Jr-, Vj 4iv Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives If the unfinished clinic space is excluded, the construction cost estimate reflects an average per square foot cost of $ 131. In our work involving animal care facilities over the last three years, we have found that construction costs for new animal care facilities comparable to the one being evaluated by the committee range from $ 140 to $ 180 per square foot (enclosed kennel space). While the upper end of the range involves development of "state of the art" facility with expansive public areas and high quality surface finishes, the lower end of the range reflects the type of facility described in the study and as discussed with the committee. As a result, we think it would be prudent to project construction costs at the $ 140 per square foot level rather than the $ 131 per square foot cost employed in the CVAG study. The factors and costs employed in the CVAG study to project architect and engineering costs, interior finishes, as well as finishing external spaces, are also consistent with acceedpt construction cost estimation practices and guidelines with exception of the following: The original study provided for a $ 125,000 lump* sum estimate for kennel equipment/finish. Our previous work has indicated that dog kennels currently cost about $ 2,200 each and cat cages range from $ 250 to $ 450each. Cost estimates for each of the alternative were adjusted as follows: Facility capacities for cats and dogs were multiplied by these amounts and the resulting amount (either above or below $ 125,000) was added to or deducted from the cost estimate as appropriate. As discussed with the committee, an estimate for construction management was added at 5% of construction costs. Exhibit V, which follows this page, shows revised space projections and construction and project development costs for each of the alternatives which incorporate the adjustments noted above. The exhibit shows space projections and estimated costs for each of the alternatives defined by the committee, and based on maximum holding periods for animals of five and ten days. The table shown on the page following the exhibit shows 25 comparative costs for each alternative and holding period variation. Page 25 Hrghes, Perry & Associates v 4 �; Description Status Quo Alternative 5 Day 10 Day Space Holding Ho1 in Projected Square Feet Admin. Projected 5,549 5,549 Adjustment M M Admin. Total f,149 6.149 Shelter Projected 15,675 15,675 Adjustment 912 fi Shelter Total 16.587 22,058 Clinic Area 2,687 2,687 Building Total [construction Cost 25,423 Dollars 30.894 Admin. And Shelter $140 Per Square Foot $3,183,040 $3,948,980 Clinic @ $65 Per Square Foot 174,655 174,655 Building Total ��` ,123,635 Site Improvements From CVAG Report 6 ,000 $� Total $3.992.695 $4,758,635 Contingency @ 10% 399,270 475,864 Construction Total $4A 695 $4,973,635 Soft Costs from CVAG Report 215,000 215,000 Soft Cost Adjustments 73,100 242,600 Fees (Architect, Engineers, Testing and Inspection, Permits) at 19% 758,612 904,141 Construction Mgmt. at 5% of Construction Cost 199,635 PROJECT TOTAL 454.042 EXHIBIT V (1) Projected Animal Services Facility Construction and Development Costs 25V.; Hughes, Perry Associates Page 26 r ,,; -� Description Full Scone Alternative 5 Day 10 Day Space Holdin H 1 i Projected Square Feet Admin. Projected 5,549 5,549 Adjustment LAQQ L400 Admin. Total 6.949 94 Shelter Projected 15,675 15,675 Adjustment 2.052 $,686 Shelter Total 17.727 24 1 Clinic Area 2.687 2.687 Building Total 27,363 33,997 (construction Cost Dollars Admin. And Shelter $140 Per Square Foot $3,454,640 $4,383,400 Clinic @ $65 Per Square Foot 174,655 174,655 Building Total .629,295 $4,558,055 Site Improvements From CVAG Report 6 .000 $635.000 Total A 2% 295 $5,193,055 Contingency @ 10% 426,430 519,306 Construction Total .479.295 $5,408,055 Soft Costs from CVAG Report 215,000 215,000 Soft Cost Adjustments 110,650 312,950 Fees (Architect, Engineers, Testing and Inspection, Permits) at 19% 810,216 986,680 Construction Mgmt. at 5% of Construction Cost 213.215 259,653 PROJECT TOTAL ,Ma28,376 $7,182.338 EXHIBIT V (2) Projected Animal Services Facility Construction and Development Costs 256 Hughes, Perry Associates Page 27 7 Description Reduced Scope Alternative 5 Day 10 Day Space Hoiain H 1 in Projected Square Feet Admin. Projected 5,549 5,549 Adjustment -40 -200 Admin. Total 5.349 5.349 Shelter Projected 15,675 15,675 Adjustments AM Shelter Total 12.711 14.83 Clinic Area 2.687 2.687 Building Total 20.747 22,875 Construction Cost Dollars Admin. And Shelter $140 Per Square Foot $2,528,400 $2,826,320 Clinic @ $65 Per Square Foot 174,655 174,655 Building Total $2.703.055 $ .00� 0.975 Site Improvements From CVAG Report $�5 000 -� Total I.�3.s.s 8.055 $3.635,975 Contingency @ 10% 333,806 363,598 Construction Total Z3.553,055 $3,850,975 Soft Costs from CVAG Report 215,000 215,000 Soft Cost Adjustments -47,150 19,350 Fees (Architect, Engineers, Testing and Inspection, Permits) at 19%u 634,230 570,185 Construction Mgmt. at 5% of Construction Cost 166.903 PROJECT TOTAL .522,038 EXHIBIT V (3) Projected Animal Services Facility Construction and Development Costs 257 Hughes, Perry Associates Page 28 Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives Alternative Projected Construction and Development Costs Capacity Based on Five Day Holding Period Capacity Based on Ten Day Holding Period Status Quo Alternative $ 5 454 042 $ 6 573 027 Full Scope Alternative 5,828,376 7,182,338 Reduced Scope Alternative I 4 522 038 42805,559 As can be seen from review of the information presented in the exhibit and the tables, extending the holding period has a significant impact on facility cost — especially for the larger facility alternatives. It should also be noted that facility capacity and resulting facility costs are predicated on housing dogs on a one per kennel basis. We have found that this is a current planning standard for new animal services facilities because individual housing for dogs and cats is reported to reduce spread of illness within shelters, and also limit injuries to both animals and kennel staff. Costs could be reduced by double housing dogs, and that is a policy issues which will need to be addressed as planning for the joint animal campus proceeds. 6. METHODS FOR ALLOCATING CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS. Clearly, any approach to sharing costs for a multi jurisdictional animal services facility and program would need to be negotiated. Additionally, net cost impact on participating jurisdictions would be dependent on the number of jurisdictions participating in the program. Cost allocation for the program and the facility could be developed based on a combination of variables such as those described on the next text page which follows Exhibit V. • Population -- to account for potential demand. • Licensed animals -- to reflect different levels of animal ownership in the various jurisdictions. • Shelter intakes by jurisdiction — Proportional use of the shelter by jurisdiction. 253- ry 047 Hughes, Perry & Associates rage- Ly Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives • Total animal days at the shelter by jurisdiction -- to reflect proportional use of the shelter facility based on actual use since some communities could have higher levels of owner redemption, impacting average length of stay. • Field patrol service hours received - to reflect agreed upon levels of service. • Field patrol service calls -- to reflect actual use of the service. Because the potential participants are interested in a tiered service approach under which a jurisdiction could select to participate in the shelter program, but not field patrol, different approaches need to be considered for each program component. Overall, we recommend the following: • Operating Cost Allocation: Principal components of a recommended cost allocation approach for operating costs would be as follows: Isolate the costs of each major program component as we did earlier in this report. For the purposes of our analysis, we identified the three major components of overall management and administration; shelter operations and services; and field services including patrol, dispatch, and licensing. Allocate management and overhead costs to the shelter and field programs by adding the costs of field services and the shelter; dividing the cost of each by that amount; and employing the resulting percentage to allocate management and administrative costs to the two principal programs. Then, employ different formulas to allocate the costs of each of the two programs to the jurisdictions which choose to participate in them. We recommend the following approach for shelter and field services: .. Shelter cost allocation: Base this amount, to the extent possible, on proportional use of the facility by member jurisdictions including potential use and actual use. Illustrative approaches could include: (1) Use of a single cost allocation variable (shelter dais used by each jurisdiction) — this approach is currently 259 Perry & Associates Page 30 G 4 8 Hughes, a ry _ Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives used by Orange county to allocate costs to participating jurisdictions for their animal services programs; (2) Use two variables like population and shelter days used which would combine potential and actual use; or (3) Use of three variables like population, licensed dogs, and shelter days which combine factors reflecting actual use and potential use of the program. When multiple variables are used, they could be weighted equally or given different weights based on negotiation. We believe the two variable approach best balances use and potential use. Those would be population, and shelter intakes. Including licensed animals as a factor would "penalize" jurisdictions with a higher proportion of licensed animals. Intakes have been selected because shelter day data are unavailable, by jurisdiction, at this time. The allocation of costs could be based on according equal value or weights to both variable, or weighting one variable more heavily than the other. For example, if the policy is that the cost allocation should be more closely related to actual (versus potential) use, then the use variable (intakes) would be more heavily weighted than the population variable. Cost shares would be calculated as follows: -- Each jurisdiction's percent share of each of the variables noted above would be calculated based on most recent calendar or fiscal year data. -- If one variable was weighted more heavily than the other, the more heavily weighted variable would be multiplied by the weighting factor before each jurisdiction's percent share of the variable was calculated. -- Percent shares for each variable for each jurisdiction would be summed and divided by two to calculate the composite percent cost share. -- The resulting percentage would be multiplied times the total projected annual operating cost to project individual jurisdiction cost share. n�,� Hughes, Perry & Associates gage jl 4 Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives .. Field Services. Variables used would depend on services provided by the program. If the program included by both patrol, enforcement and licensing, multiple variables like licensed animals, patrol service hours, and service calls would provide a balanced allocation approach. If the program were limited to field patrol, then calls for service and target service hours would provide an allocation method which balanced actual use and agreed upon service/coverage levels. Again, cost shares would be calculated as follows: -- Each jurisdiction's percent share of each of the variables noted above would be calculated based on most recent calendar or fiscal year data and agreed upon field patrol service levels/coverage. -- Percent shares for each variable for each jurisdiction would be summed and divided by three to calculate the composite percent cost share. -- The resulting percentage would be multiplied times the total projected annual operating cost to project individual jurisdiction cost share. Exhibits VI and VII, which follow this page show illustrative application of these formulas as follows: Exhibit VI shows allocated operating costs for the three alternatives under the assumption that the County would operate the program under contract with the JPA/participating jurisdictions. The illustrative cost allocation employs two variables (population and intakes) and weights population at a 25% level and intakes at a 75% level, to allocate shelter program costs, and field service costs are allocated based on service hours. Exhibit VII shows allocated operating costs for the three alternatives under the assumption that the JPA would operate the program directly. 261 Hughes, Perry Associates Wage �� & �i .. is . O +� v � r'r :3 N bA O m o0 00 N N t1� r-1 00 d� O .� W Nt-mmmNOccm 1 00 r-i t— t— cG LA t-- Of o N � to � C) LO 00 N o 00 'kc O 3 U)V n {' .� cad 0 �Q sssssssss b° c O cflOr+o�N�-+cc0) M r-1 r-1 CM ef� c0 CG t- LoO O O tom' r 4 c6 O 4 d' O :�i �+" rO-1 r� wa '-' Ci O 00 -0 00 M cc N Lo ,t 'mooNti000LOrit M CO 00 M to COCcoL O p Op r-I 04 O r-4 00 CD N LO Go M a �crioc�io coo CF 10cco LOON10rr--•1LO 0 0 W co 00 co t— CM N •dt to M 4No00CD 10r.-o� q S S MN amctzoo o �Cl-4d r♦ N r-1 ri N ° i�i Oq N 10 c O a cc W� a c A o �" 0OOOOOOOO co W N O N co 00 00 O to IO O N O O O O d' CD = O O LO MMMO *" � � *• � � 00 fM tz d' .-1 c0 N M c0 N N M N �+ C7 r-4 to N d' r-i d' O a a . o M ." p c •., o •a (Dto a •-� •a .,� 0 ..� � � Uin cd O .� Q .P.4 cod o '� a A"�aa H a0.-1 H Page 33 ti51 �-. N O w W O O O � U % b0 O t� N M CO N LO r-4 [� Ildi qd4 wOm000coOM O O ry. is CD O Lf� (3� L` w LO M .N o0 00 Lf1 M r-1 L— C` CC LA Co l— N O ri O U O LO 00 CA N O cz W O O�U b cs G Q 0 sssss�sssss s O C, 00 O O O rl r-4 00 M Mr-i O r-i O �4� GO Cfl r-i r 00 � � r-I O oowaor4CACONd'LONt �i m 00 .0 L— O 00 LO r1 rl N O p 00 r1 N 0 r.4 co CD M N in E � O � CM N N d LO ' 10 r-4 LO M v O O O O w N CO N ti CA N N -0 co O O ri M M O LO M r-4 O M O N r-4 W O d; 00 N 00 Ifs CA O 00 CO 'd' W CD O O d� O � ►� Cd rl L� rl rl O CD M M O L� O O O O O O O O O O CO CO N `d� 00 N O LLB CA O r1 .--I � C !� rl CV r-4 r-1 I N Q 00 00 4 O t6 4 OG oi Gil d' O w .CS a w �x a a Q O o 0000OOoOOO '�N gOCDd�NcDNccc0� N00co0to .,.i LA !f� O N O O ►inO O CA CD CA O O � M M 00 O r--I O tf.1 rl Q� LLB ri CD LQ 4 CO L— eta r-1 co GV CQ m CD .� N CV CO CO M N r-4 GMT v N r-4 LO N d' d' r-4 v O a a 0 > .,, cd PC ►� 4J U �. 0CS o ,, o �cd0� cd � 54� _ o�0 {'�•a ►d Piz•� ap .d a .�qcb•^' rd ,d > '� b > 263 Page 34 y v +a +a > H tp i+ U Mai .p.q 'y 00 U .- GCS 00 V O r-I m to CO 00 O O O O t� •' O CO L - cq CC O U� CC M cq O cq, c, �ccr�m0 M cq a) 00 ►n co O � OOOOI� Q M M M OO O 4 O 00 00 cq In CD O cr cooow GV N w 10- M Cd � cq 10 rrl U ra 0 Pk co a') cc O O 00 co 00 to O lw cfl l� t� O M rto-4 r-4 m U a� M O W d' d' r-1 MO Oa a cq co m co G) 00 O Q .C, cq N O Cd w a r1 a C p O O O O O to O N LO O 0 W4 co N O cq M 00 00 CD O O M r- r--I r-4 LO 00 .co er L- of cq M d� r� GV Gil M ti O a a 0 b 11 qOP4 .12 ., Cd 4" �U 0 c bx�(D pa a 0A04 H r-)A H 264 r. J� Page 35 y v 4-4 + Cd p4 Co •' � 4 L6 00 M G N om� CO G° a v,4 (A o� 7-4 col:o O�U � o 0 ssssss a s O y 00r�o�oN V in N Co ti It; O O N N O O .�" a� N r-4 N N •• 00 00 r-I N 0 P" O O 0O0 N O w C9 LO O E N c 4 a � Cd *-, o o co w U, �wt-�U)00 co10 r�-i o0-.4 o '[ .., . as 0 w O O M m O d' Lam• •d• GV M CG a a 0 4-3 •a b �, +�' o •�� g E n co CO b M m 00 v � � N 1; Ned' � a w 113 O 0 O O r-4 61 � x�r Co 00 ANI r-4 to co N N M tz 265 11 to Page 36 5 p caCVtnaoccO��tc� O w C4� �O M t- to cot-O C cq 4) at po N 1.4Up :3 ooa00000a s o p oor-+cD�r�r-4CDm M r-1 e-4 M '� w CD L- LO O 6O L� r 4 00 Q6 4 4 N � i0+ Acd O 1-4 V-4 0r-q � QI 00 'd4 00 -4 m CD N 10 m001rti000tnr-It- M r-1 M 0 C+MtoM00 O O O O 00 r-I Gil Cl r-1 00 CD N to cc m L w m LO O +a EI o0 C r-i d� to 00 M 4N 00 i+ aD N 00 M 00 v v CO N tf� N ef� *--� t[.1 m O U � r0.1 � N k00 c O o w 4P.- PW O CD co CDl-MN` Ul)co d' O' r� O M N CO CO o CV 000 -0 4 r�-1 N v .4 O F rl N r-4 I CD 1-4 CD .Q N N 10 O w w a Cl) a ..�•� O O O O O o 0 0 0 Lo LO O N O O in 0 v x d' d• d' CD N O N co 00 00 00 CD m o O LO M m 0 o It r I rl In r V N CV m N '04 N r-I Lo C0V rm-i -0' q O ''d W A 44 �Da d C •"" 4 04 OP14 04 b° O Cl)m c0 o U 4 ,� VCc cd � c, V 0 .--i c POO r-o� '��0 ? c C3 o 00 E4 266 Page 37 ^ _+ a 4)'L3 N" +> > G) E, to A oo C)mONw10ww o ,..� 0 ti cooc�r-+c�c�ti�� o cq to O M cq H�} GOO PO a ocn� O a ►r,t-0t-cm0d+to000 O CO v- 4 r- 4 00 M 10 r-i CO rl O CO o0 cD r4 Ld o0 c4 4 4 L O r4 '-A i� 00. G�aod'NOooOrlriti N d' CD d M ' O M Om00Mr-I000DCD� O C O +� E+ 00 r1 Cv O OCw CD M N o0 O r� d' O 00 CM 0) d' N r-1 o0 O CD 00 L 00 00 O m it d' d' O N d' N 00 Ca d� M N t[� N d� d� M r-1 ri O r--1 O ri LO N LC� O r-a r-i rl N r-1 rl N M O o U m � r4 W ►� CD OO cD N M N 00 0 O. O O O O O O O O O O O O O dw O d; N oo d' 00 r-4 r-1 r-a r-1 Cal N ri c64 o0 N d' 00 O D ri Gil r- U �i o0 '4 � O w A o .o P � o 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 d0' O O O N CD O O ko CM M 00 m O x �N ' O co g N 0 N m cD d' O CD 00 C 3 0 Cr) N d' 't O Le r 4 Q) CD Ifs O v 10 co N N M co M Cv d' ^' � N� O N dN' d' � a a 0 .., b W '�tin 0 w by ai o ., ...polo r oil '� w Cd 00p 44aaaw� Eo+ pr4U aaa. H 267 Page 38 t J v 6 N LO .-1 00 0 t- m r-4 o L 0000 00 1-4 CAD in U Cn 64.�. Besse s N O 00 m CD O % . M � M m Or-q C a cd 00 a)i�NLor 00 t- CDDNm O 00 � CDCD cV O r, m � CD O Cd H N d' ri N d' co d' cq to M M cq Or•l U .� r-1 N �Cd w a� Cd � � � M 0 CO Cl M M O � is C) M O 00 O w a w � 0 0 C4 .° q 0 00 CD O O CO m rNi r'1 rN-4 tC j 00 .4 N N M [- O a a 0 b M VU1P4.240, sw CD (1) c CD • 'b o � o C 0A�aa H Cd 4 aA E-+ 265 Page 39 5 H � be � a' cDOoul�mt-o CtD ITV O o ►-+ +� O a� CD C.0 ° O c10 � r-4 M lit `� ° O 4 r-+ r+ O W •�Om'� v q �. :3 C) ssssss s o 00r-+OoN d; lo N CD N 44o O PC! COV rr-� N N Nrn C r� a p p 00 00 r-4 N lf) pCl) 00 N O CD N tfi Co *-� m r1 CD O C3 d' N '0 1-4 ►O 10 CD `d, m N o �, w d x CD tot- to 00 p d+ •-+ r-+ �, '0 M N CM M (M M o 00 O O F�1 it r1 ri N ice+ A N C 01 v O .'y cd v wt W 4% a Cd W 0 pr.Cd o a •a a ,o O O O O O O N O N po tfw O N O 0 cD CD co m ao � co rq�� O coM 00 •� .� �i � �i ... a .., P4 so Z s� i+ .P4 s.,►�i�A "A CD r.. m +, UA►�a E-4 Wa A E4 269 Page 40 Evaluation of Animal Service Campus Alternatives • Capital Costs. We recommend that the equally weighted variables of population (potential demand); shelter intakes (actual demand); and licensed animals (potential demand) be employed to allocate capital costs between and among participating jurisdictions. Exhibits VIII and IX, which follow this page, show illustrative applications of this formula. Again, because licensed animals by jurisdiction data are unavailable at this time, two variables (intakes and population) have been employed for illustrative purposes. Exhibit VIII shows construction cost allocation for a facility sized based on a five day maximum holding period, and Exhibit IX for a facility sized for a ten day maximum holding period. As can be seen from review of the exhibits, the reduced scope alternative cost allocation for both operating and capital costs includes illustrative cost under two scenarios — with and without Riverside County participating as a member of the JPA. These two variations have been presented because, as noted earlier in this report, it would need to be determined if the County would participate in this reduced scope alternative if it continued to serve Indio, Coachella, and La Quinta and through the contract, staffed a shelter and field operations in the East Valley. x � � The appendix which follows at the end of this report, after Exhibits VIII and IX, contains the space program and cost estimate included in the original CVAG report and adjusted, as previously described, in this study. 270 Hughes, Perry & Associates Page 41 r,59 EXHIBIT VIII (1) Illustrative Formula for Allocating Capital Costs - Facility Sized for Five Day Stay Allocation Factors Participating Jurisdiction Population Shelter Intakes Allocation Percent Cost Factor Total Share Share Cathedral City 44,650 1,416 46,066 16.49% $899,173 Coachella 23,950 2,078 26,028 9.32% 508,046 Desert Hot Springs 17,000 1,416 18,416 6.59% 369,466 Indian Wells 4,020 17 4,037 1.44% 78,799 Indio 51,500 1,203 52,703 18.86% 1,028,722 La Quints 26,300 862 27,162 9.72% 530,181 Palm Desert 42,350 434 42,784 15.31% 835,110 Rancho Mirage 13,900 105 14,005 5.01% 273,367 Riverside County 46,040 2,178 48,218 17,26% 941,178 Total 279.419 100.0 0 $5,454,042 2. Full Scope Alternative Allocation Factors Participating Jurisdiction Population Shelter Intakes Allocation Percent Cost Factor Total Share Share Cathedral City 44,650 1,416 46,066 14.17% $825,978 Coachella 23,950 2,078 26,028 8.01% 466,690 Desert Hot Springs 17,000 1,416 18,416 5.67% 330,205 Indian Wells 4,020 17 4,037 1.24% 72,385 Indio 51,500 1,203 52,703 16.21% 944,982 La Quinta 26,300 862 27,162 8.36% 487,023 Palm Desert 42,350 434 42,784 13.16% 767,131 Palm Springs 43,800 1,838 45,638 14.04% 818,304 Rancho Mirage 13,900 105 14,005 4.31% 251,114 a Riverside County 46,040 2,178 48,218 14 % 864,564 Total 325,057 100.00% $5,828,376 N Hughes, Perry Associates r-4 to tO 0 v 00 O 00 co to O M et' t'!Co 0', '0 O 41 w N -Cf. 0 C+M t0 N L cq U � m Cto D 4 LOO„ r-1 r-1 4a co O N dr co O it t- t� N r! -!cd M M PC:C) rr-1 r- a CD CO t- 1%4 to p O 'dam Oco O M 0 pbg co to t- lq:r tO r-1 r-1 r-I co O sw r.r O O O O O tO O N to O CO O O M m 4 Na, � r 4 CD r-I O M Co dq M v m N M m tO O O O O L 4 er CG N O o t- O T+ CO t0 N U x N er 9-4 r-+ M 04 to r-1 1. r-1 El9 to r-4 Cf3 to t- O O to co CO co O ti Cal N a0 t-: N Or -I a pa O to t- d' L °00 N 0 o CO 40 cqu vcgv �E+ 0 r� i CD co t- d' to 00 r-4 1-1 r-t M O t- er d' er r-1 r-I �+ H r-i r-i N sw •rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 •� to O N 0 O d4 t0 O O M 0 O d' N d0 N M CD er r1 d' r-1 v • G7 qq ^ a �x �A ob b ciA�a H 272 Page 43 cMC +5 � � ps E .pqO '4-a w h LO O 7--1 O O O M O M C: rL1 +� 61 w co N CD 00 m M M y a C� 00 r� cn Gil to r1 m v eM 10 M N o tv CrM CV CrM -I or; 00 cC O'� et' oo r-4 Cr3 O M cri O N M M O GS N O 000 c�D O LO er O O cep LO d� M O O CM O Co r•�l (� C" O co d' N co O M r� (� O r-1 r� +a 4 4 ez r-4 r-i r+ r-i 400. r1 .rV V C3 w O ty d) N d� eN CC N rl r-1 er M to 00 t+ m CoN O N rl t� rI w CO eN ra r-4O CO N N M r-1 (0M O O 6 cD r4 Oo 6 6 to v O 4 00 6 ri cD 00 M 4 4 d' ri r+ r4 r-i a 0 be cs Q 0 Q to 00 w t— co N eH to CC N r-4 M O w co O % O 0o w tom• m N er Go O co N r-4 CO O w M O O p O O eN O L -4 N O d' O p +� E'+ too O O d� O L r-1 w O to w 00 v N t- N to -0 O +r E CO cG 00 d' N tz cl v v N r-4 tp N d' V v N r-I O N er Vr-1 �' M V N O � � w W x co 00 to t- cM N er O 00 t- r-4 9-4 O co M O t- x to 00 co t- c+M N It 00 LO 00 1-4 t- r-1 r'a O O M M O P N 00 V rI 1 100 O 100 N 00 v 00 r-I r-1 F-1 ri N rl ri N �' M•y rl CV ri CI r4 r-Iok rr ..� '� LO O O N O O to O v O to to O N O O to O O v LOm M 0 O M Cd c0 0 0 Lo C+M M 00 C) O c'o t. d' 4 cG of CrM M cD er C6 t- eM 14 cD GV ce v cV r-I O N V ri V willN r1 LO C4 d' er r-1 er a •~ PC PCs a % a •r A o Cd a P� C: ° x� �•a b o �. qx q� o.., 43 cd oA�,�awa E ��A,�►�taaao E+ 273 Page 44 �:60 + >b N w C3 p� w� E o +� W 14 rd +� y � N P4cn 0 W O CM C ) o 7-1 m M o r-f CD O in CD N 00 t- O 10 to CO 4 O t� O Co O o lid, M p U � t- 1` r-4 W LO r-4 r-1 y� t- t- N r-i r-I O O COM M r-4 � QI q CCt in r-4 c 0`00 0 oL O�ror o C600,V, cq, 1444, 0 x Co Co t- lid' Lo r-I r-4 ri M O r♦ ri nr O O O O O 10 O N tc] O CD O O co m t � �i d' rM-I a ... .., PC +p' a w ' U � P p-I �x� 0,4, H M o O M Q) O O M O 0 d' 10 M to 4 t- O t- 00 00 M 10 0 0 n6 IT 4 0t0 M p U� c%►nV-4r-+MM o r-I r-I r4 4 O O LO CD Cm9 co O I O GV N i0i 7-4 CCVOa rl pa m co 1` "r 10CD 0 o a o t- i �E �a�o`r� 4 M a C) 0 .462 � o W oot`lqdlo00 r-I r-4 r-I m O t- M�1 IT IT N ►,+ O O O o 0 0 ` LO O N Ili O 10 to O O co M O ^..I r�-1 � v rM-1 v a o� Z.I. ... U f/aj bxaA�PIN IV b pa �A"0aa H 274 Page 45 r; 6 APPENDIX CVAG SPACE PROGRAM FOR AN ANEMIAL CAMPUS 275 f,6 W L C A r c h i t e c t s Lorry Wolff, AIA • George M. Wiens, AIA • Robert J. Hensley, AIA • James P. DiComillo, AIA • Robert M. Simons, AIA February 2, 2001 FACILITY PROGRAM AND CONCEPTUAL DESIGN Coachella Valley Association of Governments Animal Care Campus Project No. 00-216.01 Introduction: The Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) is seeking to establish an animal care campus to serve the communities in the Coachella Valley. CVAG s intent is to establish an animal care shelter on a site that is also going to be shared with an animal care facility for the Animal Samaritans of Coachella Valley. This document is expressly for the establishment of a facility program for the CVAG Shelter, conceptual design of both site and building layout, corresponding project cost estimate, and schedule. Although not in specific detail, this document addresses the master planning of the site for the incorporation of the Animal Samaritan Facility to be constructed as a separate project. As the number of residents increases in the Coachella Valley, so correspondingly does the al population increase in the valley. To establish a facility that is designed to accommodate all of the facilities necessary for citizens of the community, this document describes the building improvements needed for services associated with an animal shelter including temporary habitation, medical treatment, spay/neuter clinic, care and grooming for adoption, and community -wide educational programs. The CVAG established a planning committee (committee members are listed in the appendix) that was responsible for the conceptual ideas and guidance in developing this planning document. Facility Space Program: The CVAG Animal Shelter will include both dog and cat indoor kennels, specialty kennels, veterinarian clinic, adoptions area, grooming and food preparation areas, administrative of anodffices, and staff service areas. As an option, the dog kennels can be outdoors with roes specific areas in facilities for heating/cooling the kennels. The following summary outlinesarea thatshoulre be the Shelter that will be developed along with important features of each addressed. 276 Virginia Dare Tower • 10470 Foothill Boulevard • Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 - 3754 • ph: 909 987 0909 fax: 909 980 9980 1110 Iron Point Road • Suite 200 a Folsom, California 95630.8301 • ph: 916 355 9922 fax: 916 355 9950 1. Facility Program and Conceptual Design Coachella Valley Association of Governments Animal Care Campus Project No. 00-216.01 February 2, 2001 Page 2 Dog Kennels The facility should include 72 indoor dog kennels that are constructed of durable, easily maintainable materials and should be attractive for viewing as a part of the pet adoption process. Each kennel should be approximately 4' wide x 10' long with a guillotine door dividing the kennel in half so that the dog can occupy one half of the kennel while the other half is easily cleaned. The kennel should be constructed of epoxy floor over concrete that slopes to the center drain system for easy kennel wash down. The kennel walls should be stainless steel cages and possibly include concrete block partitions in the lower portion of the kennel. A watering system with an outlet at each dog kennel should be provided. For ease of maintenance, the floors and lower portion of the walls of the circulation areas outside of the dog kennel should also be epoxy surface. There should be an overhead hose reel system for washing down both kennels and surrounding circulation spaces. The upper walls and ceilings in the kennel area should also be a smooth surface for easy cleaning. For sound control, absorptive panels should be mounted on the ceiling to reduce noise to an acceptable level. The kennel area should be divided into two or three rooms so that portions of the space can be closed off for injured and sick dogs, aggressive dogs, and quarantined dogs. Each of these kennel spaces should have its own air circulation system that does not mix air with other portions of the building to limit the spread of infectious contaminants. As a design option, the dog kennels can be outdoor facilities. The kennel area would have a roof overhead and would be of similar construction as the indoor kennels. Heating of the kennels would be by radiant floor heating system. The kennels would be cooled either by evaporative cooling or water misters. Cat Kennels The cats in the Shelter should be housed in a room separate from the dog kennels. The room should contain stainless steel cages, possibly rolling cages, stacked two high, elevated off the floor for ease of maintenance and good visibility. The cat room should include a wall mounted utility sink, epoxy floors with drain, and an overhead hose reel for wash down. Windows should be provided in the interior walls so that visual_ access into the cages can be taken advantage of by the public in the adoption process. 277 Facility Program and Conceptual Design Coachella Valley Association of Governments Animal Care Campus Project No. 00-216.01 February 2, 2001 Page 3 Veterinarian Clinic (This space to be Shell -In Only, interior improvements are to be a part of a future project). The primary use of the clinic is for spaying and neutering both dogs and cats. It will include exam rooms, surgery preparation area, and surgery rooms. An X-ray room and recovery rooms should also be provided. For the staff and public using the clinic, administrative spaces should be provided and a public lobby and reception area separate from the main Shelter should be developed. Main Public Lobby and Administrative Areas The Shelter should present a warm and inviting entrance for the public as well as the animals that are brought into the Shelter through the front door. The entry should be sheltered from elements in terms of wind, sun, and rain, and windows should be provided in the lobby so that it is a light and inviting space. The lobby and reception space should include areas for general waiting, a front counter for assistance and services provided by staff, public restrooms, educational information displays, and inviting access to the kennel areas along with conference room and educational spaces. Administrative Spaces and Office Area Administrative areas should be centrally located within the facility to provide both physical and visual access to the entrance and lobby/reception area, along with direct visual access to kennel portions of the facility. Spaces should include an open office administrative area behind the front counter, private offices for senior staff, separate office areas for dispatching, report writing, and supervisors' offices. Open office area should be provided for the kennel technicians and staff volunteers. Support spaces should include staff restrooms with lockers and showers, electrical room for both power and voice/data communication systems, staff break room, and storage areas. Kennel Support Area These areas need to include a large food storage room, food preparation room, animal grooming and cleaning room, euthanasia/freezer/crematory area, and general storage and janitorial spaces. A covered outdoor area should be provided for loading and unloading of animals. The outdoor area should include easy access to the walk-in freezer, wash down and clean up facilities, outdoor storage, and deliveries of food and supplies. 278 Facility Program and Conceptual Design Coachella Valley Association of Governments Animal Care Campus Project No. 00-216.01 February 2, 2001 Page 4 Site Development and Building Exterior Features The site that is to be used to develop the CVAG Animal Shelter along with the master plan for a Good Samaritan Animal Shelter is approximately 10 acres (300 feet long on the street frontage and approximately 1,000 feet deep). This site will essentially be divided down the middle lengthwise so that each facility can be developed separately, but can possibly share common driveways, parking, and outdoor activity and service areas. At least two driveway entrances should be developed at the front of the facility with visitor parking for approximately 30 vehicles. An access/service drive should be developed down the middle of the site that will serve both facilities as well as allow public access to the rear portion of the site for scheduled activities. Staff parking should include a minimum of 24 spaces for vehicular parking, along with an additional 12 spaces for designated service vehicles. An enclosed outdoor service yard should be provided to contain the animal drop off area, outdoor animal runs, and large animal pens, and overnight service vehicle parking. This enclosed service area will allow for a variety of animal support functions and will maintain security for both the animals housed and facility staff and equipment. Portions of this area should be sheltered and enclosed from the elements. Outdoor Activity eas At the rear portion of the site, large activity spaces can be provided that will include outdoor exercise areas, training and educational programs, and special public events. This portion of the site should be flexible in its designated program use so that a variety of future activities can be accommodated. 279 Facility Program and Conceptual Design Coachella Valley Association of Governments Animal Care Campus Project No. 00-216.01 February 2, 2001 Page 5 Summary of Programmed Areas The following table indicates the various spaces needed throughout the facility and includes both quantity and size of each space. Building Areas Spaces SF Each Total Comments Administration Areas Lobby/Reception 1 800 800 Includes front counter Staff Work Area 1 200 200 Includes office machines Directors Office 1 200 200 Field Supervisor 1 150 150 Next to dog kennels Staff Office 3 150 450 Report Writing 1 250 250 Dispatch 1 200 200 Sound isolated room Open Office 4 60 240 Equipment Storage 1 60 60 Kennel Techs 1 300 300 Next to dog kennels Secured Storage 1 100 100 Next to animal control sup. Janitorial 1 60 60 Public Restrooms 2 150 300 Next to public lobby Staff Break Rbom 1 300 300 Conference/Education Room 1 500T 500 Next to public lobby Subtotal Administration 42110 Circulation at 35% 1,439 Total Administration 5,549 Clinic Areas Clinic Reception/Work Area 1 500 500 Includes reception Shot Clinic 1 100 100 Exam Room 1 120 120 Surgery Prep Room 1 250 250 Surgery Room 1 200 200 Recovery Room 2 150 300 Vet's Office 1 120 120 X-Ray 1 150 150 Pharmacy/Laboratory 1 150 150 Janitorial IT 100 100 Subtotal Clinic Areas 1,990 Circulation at 35% 697 Total Clinic Areas 2 687 , Facility Program and Conceptual Design Coachella Valley Association of Governments Animal Care Campus Project No. 00-216.01 February 2, 2001 Page 6 # Spaces SF Each Total Comments Kennel Areas Dog Kennels 72 40 2,880 Puppy Rooms 1 425 425 Cat Rooms 1 425 425 Get Acquainted Rooms 2 75 150 General Storage 1 150 150 Animal Receiving Area 1 150 150 Next to dog kennels Food Storage 1 400 400 Outdoor access Food Preparation 1 200 200 Grooming 1 200 200 Laundry 1 100 100 Janitorial 1 150 150 Mechanical 1 150 150 Staff Restrooms/Showers 2 200 400 Euthanasia Room 1 200 200 Crematorium 1 350 350 Freezer 1 120 120 Covered Vehicle Area 1 1,800 1,800 Subtotal Kennel Areas 82250 Circulation at 90% 7,425 Total Kennel Areas 15,675 GRAND TOTAL BUILDING AREAS 23,910 OUTDOOR AREAS Vehicle Parking - Staff 24 400 9,600 Vehicle Parking - Public 30 400 12,000 Vehicle Parking - Trucks 12 400 4,800 Large Animal Pens 8 600 4,800 Dog Exercise Area 2 2,000 4,000 Large Animal Exercise Area 1 5,000 5,000 Paved Site Access @ 30% of total 1 13,000 13,000 Landscaping @ 30% of total 1 13,000 13,000 Building 1 23,910 23,910 TOTAL I 1 90110 281 t,70 Facility Program and Conceptual Design Coachella Valley Association of Governments Animal Care Campus Project No. 00-216.01 February 2, 2001 Page 7 Project Cost Estimate The conceptual project cost estimate is developed to help establish an overall budget for all costs associated with the construction of the new CVAG Animal Care Campus. Although historical information is used from the design and construction of other animal care shelters in California, the actual project costs will vary based upon final facility design, economic factors (construction cost climate), and construction development process (project phasing, timeline, construction methods utilized). This project estimate utilizes the different types of spaces and improvements for the facility as outlined in the space program and site master plan. Costs are reflected on a square foot basis depending upon the particular type of improvement established. As the project is further developed in the final planning and design processes, the cost estimate will be significantly refined and developed. An overall contingency is provided within the cost estimate to accommodate fluctuations in project development and inflationary factors. Estimated costs are indicated in two categories — construction costs and soft costs. Soft costs include all project costs except the actual construction contract amount. These costs include planning and design, permit and review fees, construction testing and inspection, and furniture and equipment. The construction costs include the construction contracts (bid amounts) and contingency. Project Cost Estimate Construction Costs Description Unit Cost Amount Administration 1. Lobby/Reception/Office 3,500 sf $135.00 472,500.00 2. Restrooms 300 sf 200.00 60,000.00 3. Storage/Circulation 1,700 sf 120.00 204,000.00 Subtotal 52500 $ 7362500.00. Clinic - Shell -In Only 1. Reception/Work 500 sf 65.00 32,500.00 2. Exam/Surgery/Recovery 1,500 sf 65.00 97,500.00 3. Storage/Circulation 700 65.00 45,500.00 Subtotal 2,700 $ 175,500.00 r� Facility Program and Conceptual Design Coachella Valley Association of Governments Animal Care Campus Project No. 00-216.01 February 2, 2001 Page 8 Construction Costs Description Unit Cost Amount Kennel Areas 1. Dog Kennels 2. Puppy Rooms 3. Cat Rooms 4. Grooming/Laundry/Food Prep/Get Acquainted 2,880 sf 165.00 $ 475,200.00 425 sf 150.00 63,750.00 425 sf 150.00 63,750.00 650 sf 140.00 91,000.00 5. Euthanasia Room 200 sf 150.00 30,000.00 6. Freezer 150 sf 200.00 30,000.00 7. Storage/Circulation/Receiving 9,145 sf 130.00 1,188,850.00 8. Covered Outdoor Area 1,800 sf 50.00 90,000.00 Subtotal 15,675 $ 2,032,550.00 Subtotal Building Area 239875 29944,550.00 Reduction in cost for optional outdoor 6,340 sf 35.00 ($221,900.00) kennels Outdoor Improvements 1. Off -Site Improvements 1 is 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 2. Utilities lls 200,000.00 200,000.00 3. Site Grading 5 acres 25,000.00 125,000.00 4. Paving, Walks, Curbs 39,400 if 3.50 I37,900.00 5. Large Animal Pens 4,800 sf 4.50 21,600.00 6. Animal Exercise 7,000 sf 3.50 24,500.00 7. Landscaping 13,000 sf 2.00 26,000.00 Subtotal $ 6352000.00 Subtotal Construction Cost 3,579,550.00 Contingency at 10% 357,955.00 Total Estimated Construction Cost 319372505.00 Soft Costs Equipment and Furniture 1. Office Furniture and Equipment 6,000 sf 15.00 $ 90,000.00 2. Kennel Equipment 1 is 125,000.00 125,000.00 3. Clinic Equipment N.I.C. 0.00 0.00 $ 215,000.00 Subtotal 283 Facility Program and Conceptual Design Coachella Valley Association of Governments Animal Care Campus Project No. 00-216.01 February 2, 2001 Page 9 Construction Costs Description Unit Cost Amount Fees, Testing, Inspection (Indicated as a percentage of construction cost) 1. Architect/Engineer 8% 2. Agency Approvals 3. Connection Fees 2% 6% $ 315,000.40 78,750.10 236,250.30 4. Testing and Inspection 3% 118,125.15 Subtotal 7482125.95 TOTAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATE Project Schedule 4,900,630.95 The schedule outlined below indicates a typical timeline for how the CVAG Animal Care Campus could be developed within a reasonable amount of time if funding is available for the entire project. If it is determined that the project should be phased over a number of years in separate increments, the timelines should be adjusted accordingly. The timeline includes planning and design process, bidding and award of contract process, construction period, and a facility move -in and commissioning process. �Architect o�om��oo Selection Site Investigation/Surveys ism= Architect Design and Construction Document 1�...1111111111111 Agency Review/Approval Building Department Approval Bid and Award Contract Construction Facility Program and Conceptual Design Coachella Valley Association of Governments Animal Care Campus Project No. 00-216.01 February 2, 2001 Page 10 Conclusion This document was developed to provide planning guidance and direction for the development of the Coachella Valley Association of Governments Animal Care Campus. The document is only one of the first steps in a process that can result in an animal shelter that will provide much needed services for the Coachella Valley for many years. Understanding the importance of expenditures of public funds, hopefully this document will be the foundation of the design and construction of the new shelter. It should not be viewed as a rigid manual on how to design and construct the new shelter, but as a flexible guide document that can spark new ideas for the final design and construction of the new shelter. GMW:sd P0021600x3-prg \2000\00216\1-SO\00216A21r.dwg Fri Feb 02 14:28:17 2001 (C) Copyright WLC Architects, Inc. a t I I LJ Y P I 1 i 1 1 I I I Qlq I n Jd 1 I aJ= 1 Cn T O O Cn � • Cd U O O v� O � r--� Cd U Cd Cd u Cd Cd U CC3 O u r 5 286 ]:\2000\00216\1-SO\00216A21outdoors.dwg Fri Feb 02 14:25:03 2001 (C) Copyright WLC Architects, Inc. I O O O cam, � Q � 0 O a CC3 C/) � U O �+ O v1 W � cid u v Cd Cd u > r--4 cfj Cd �--+ � v Cd O Al 2 7 ATTACHMENT 2 City Council Minutes 18 July 3, 2001 It was moved by Council Members Henderson/Sniff to adopt Resolution No. 2001-94 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. In response to Mayor Pena, Mark Wasserman, of Waste Management of the Desert, reported on the success of the new recycling containers. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS All reports were noted and filed. DEPARTMENT REPORTS 4-A. REPORT ON CVAG'S EVALUATION OF ANIMAL SERVICES CAMPUS ALTERNATIVES. Building & Safety Director Hartung reported Council Member Adolph is looking for Council's input to take back to CVAG's Human and Community Resources meeting on July 61h regarding the Evaluation of Animal Services Campus Alternatives. Council Member Adolph noted the CVAG report does not address what will become of the animal shelter in Indio and how it will affect La Quinta. He felt the Indio facility is more geographically located and beneficial to the east valley jurisdictions and understood there's sufficient room to expand the facility. He stated CVAG staff has recommended the Human and Community Resources Committee recommend that the Executive Committee approve the concept for a valley -wide animal campus and authorize CVAG to distribute the final report to each member jurisdiction for consideration to participate in the project. Council Member Perkins noted the proposed location is 19 miles from La Quinta. He felt CVAG should be told that La Quinta wishes to continue using the Indio facility. He also questioned some of the figures in the report. Council Member Sniff didn't see a problem with the Executive Committee disseminating the information to the jurisdictions but didn't feel Council Member Adolph should indicate any support from La Quinta for the proposed valley -wide facility. He felt it should be made known that La Quinta is interested in maintaining use of the Indio facility because it's more convenient and less expensive. Council concurred. 288 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: Consideration of Memorandum of Understanding with the County of Riverside for Provision of Library Services RECOMMENDATION: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of La Quinta and the County of Riverside for the provision of library services effective July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2005. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The new Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), as proposed by the County, guarantees the City will receive between 76% and 85% of total library revenues generated in the City for library purposes. An additional $590,863 is pledged to the City's Library Capital Fund over the life of the MOU. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The City Council discussed library options during a Study Session on March 20, 2001, and, subsequently, during another Study Session on July 17, 2001. During the latter session, staff presented the options available to the City for the provision of library services, including: 1) withdraw from the County Library System, 2) remain in the County Library System, and 3) negotiate a new (temporary) MOU with the County. The City Council considered these options and reviewed a proposal by the County regarding an extended MOU. The proposed contents of an extended MOU were outlined in a letter from the County dated July 3, 2001 (Attachment 1). 289 The Council directed staff to negotiate a new MOU with the County and, concurrently, to prepare a "Notice of Intent to Withdraw" from the County system (in the event the Council decided to initiate the withdrawal process). Staff has been involved in several discussions with County staff, with the purpose of negotiating the terms of a new MOU. As a result, a new MOU (Attachment 2) has been prepared which contractually commits the County to the proposal contained within their letter dated July 3, 2001. The new MOU would be in effect from July 1, 2002, to June 30, 2005 and includes the following provisions: • County will work cooperatively with the City to design, construct and develop a library service plan for a new facility. • County will work cooperatively with the City to apply for grants to construct a new library facility. • County will transfer at least $590,863 in mitigation (or other funds) to the City for construction of a new library facility during the term of the MOU. • County will spend on library services, or transfer to the City Library Fund, a guaranteed percentage of library revenues (FY 2002/03-76%, FY 2003/04-81 %, FY 2004/05-85%). City and County staff prepared the MOU to include greater definition on several items. Some of these items included: determining a schedule of payments for both the mitigation funds and the guaranteed percentages; clarifying that the mitigation funds were above and beyond the guaranteed percentages; and establishing a formula for deriving the amount of City -entitled funds from guaranteed percentages. During the Study Session of July 17, a question was raised in relation to the City's cost of operating its own library if the decision were made to withdraw from the County Library System. Staff contacted the City of Murrieta to obtain information on their library services given that the City of Murrieta recently withdrew from the County Library System. In addition, the size of their library staff and library facility (approximately 4,000 square feet), and hours of operation (40 hours per week) are somewhat similar to those of the La Quinta Library. For fiscal year 2000-2001, the City of Murrieta Library operated on a $533,000 budget. Personnel costs totaled roughly $341,000; operations and maintenance costs amounted to nearly $186,000; and almost $6,000 was spent on capital items. The City Council also asked that staff consider the issue of City overhead costs. Using fiscal year 2001-2002 budget figures, excluding capital and bond payments, staff calculated the City's overhead costs at roughly 19.2%. A more detailed 290 002 description of this calculation is provided as Attachment 3. Application of this overhead factor to library budget operations would suggest that the County's administration of library functions may have a value exceeding $50,000, using the City's overhead factor (i.e., $285,000 x 19.2% = $54,720). Pursuant to Council direction, staff has also drafted a resolution (Attachment 4) that if adopted, would initiate withdrawal from the County Library System. Adoption of the resolution would serve as notification to the Riverside County Board of Supervisors that the City of La Quinta no longer desires to be a part of the Riverside County Free Library System (effective July 1, 2002), and that the City intends to acquire all La Quinta Library collections, furniture and furnishings. If adopted, the resolution would be forwarded to the County Board of Supervisors for their appropriate action. The State's deadline for filing this notice is December 1 of the year prior to the actual withdrawal. However, the State has expressed that in order to ensure timely processing by the State and other agencies, the notice should be filed at least two months prior to the deadline (i.e., late September/early October). Formal consideration of this resolution must be held during a duly noticed public meeting. Thus, if the Council wishes to pursue withdrawal, staff would publish a notice and bring the resolution back for consideration at a later date. Finally, it should be noted that the City and County differ on the issue of how redevelopment pass -through funds (tax increment) can be spent upon withdrawal. Given the provisions of recent legislation, the City's legal position is that upon withdrawal, the City is entitled to library tax increment funds; and further, that any tax increment funds can be spent on both library capital items and operations and maintenance. In general, County Counsel suggests that the City may not be entitled to the increment pursuant to a previous settlement agreement and that, even if the County and City agreed to the transfer of such dollars to the City, these dollars may be restricted to capital expenses (Attachment 5). FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of La Quinta and the County of Riverside for the provision of library services effective July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2005; or 2. Approve a Memorandum of Understanding with modifications between the City of La Quinta and the County of Riverside for the provision of library services effective July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2005; 291- 0!i3 3. Do not approve a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of La Quinta and the County of Riverside for the provision of library services; or 4. Direct staff to bring back a resolution initiating the process for withdrawing from the County Library System; or 5. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Approved for submission by: J1 c-L IN homas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. County Letter - Proposal for Library Services 2. County's Proposed Library MOU 3. Calculation on City Overhead Costs 4. Draft Resolution - "Intent to Withdraw" 5. County Counsel Opinion 094 JUL-03-01 TUE 11:16 AM EXECUTIVE OFFICE FAX NO. 9C ATTACHMENT 1 &eeUlive Office C.OSWu V of Rlversidc July 3, 2001 Thomas Genovese City Manager City oFT,a Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quintal, CA 92253 .Dear Mr. Cenoveso. OF �t oa c - � �• Larry !'crrrisit count}, aecutive Ojjiccr �9Y9bqlb ,1 VIA FAX and MAIL. This letter proposes revisions to the existing MOU between the County and the City for library service that will extend the agreement 111rough ,bane 30, 2005, As you k1low, under the current MOU the County pays all costs to QPel,4te the I,a Quinta Public IAbrary and transfers additional Rinds to a City library fund. T3y:tune :30, 2002, the end of the current three-year MOU, the County will have Provided xt Icust $1,620,940 for librcuy services, lease improvements, furnituTe aiid equipmi7 nt, facility leaks, and fund transfers to the City Library fu11c1. The Coiulty, basod on staff e.o1lsonsus during discussions wifli the City, proposes 10 extend flit MOU for three additional years, gorrorally under the same tern -is with following niajor changes: • C:ounty will work; cooperrttively with the City to design, construct and develop a library service plan for a new facility. • County will wort{ cooperatively with the City to apply for grants to construct a new library facility. • County will transfer at least $590'1863 in Mitigation (or other funds) to the City for constrt►ction-of a nowr library facility during the tern of the MOU. * County will spend oii library services (iiicludiiig facility lease and cxpcnscs) or transfer to the City T,ibraly fund a guaranteed percentage of library revenues front City rode-velopnient pass-throujg i agreements, the library increment of the property tax, and the City Portion of state Public Library foundation Rinds, The percentage will be according to the following schedule: Fiscal Year 200212003 -- 76% Viscal Year 2003J2004 - 81 % I iscal Year 2004/2005 - 85% Robert T. Andersen Administrariyi�, Center 40801:Lenion Street • 12111 Floor . piyerside, Californ ia 92501 • (gpg) 955-110a w Fax (909) 9 5-11!)5 293 � e7-93-91 10:f3 0 RECEIVED FROM:909 955 1105 F . 92 ATTACHMENT 2 LIBRARY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") is made and entered into by the City of La Quinta ("City") and the County of Riverside ("County")., WHEREAS, the County has offered to enhance existing library services as an alternative to the City exercising its right to withdraw from the County Library System; and, WHEREAS, the City and County desire to enhance the delivery of library services within the City, and have reached an agreement that they wish to set forth in writing in the form of this MOU. The City and the County therefore agree as follows: SECTION 1: TERM This MOU shall take effect on July 1, 2002 and shall remain in effect through and including June 30, 2005. The City and County agree that there is no commitment, guarantee, or requirement for the City to extend this MOU. The City may, at its option, request an extension of this MOU as it exists or with modified terms. If the City desires to extend the term of the MOU, the City and County shall negotiate in good faith to extend the agreement. Unless agreed to by the City, any extension to this MOU would use the then existing service levels, building size, etc. as the floor of acceptable standards for future library service. The City fully reserves its rights to withdraw from the County Library System pursuant to existing laws and regulations, effective with the expiration of this MOU or subsequent extensions. SECTION 2: HOURS/DAYS OF OPERATION During the term of this MOU, the La Quinta Branch Library shall be open: a minimum of six (6) days per week including 2 evenings and Sunday; and be open a minimum of 40 hours per week. Daily hours will be set by Riverside County with review and recommendations by the City. If it is determined that the hours need to be changed to facilitate the City residents' needs, the City may request a reorganization of the hours. Such reorganization shall not be unreasonably denied by the County; every effort will be made to implement such changes within thirty (30) days written request by the City. SECTION 3: COLLECTION The County agrees to spend a minimum of $5,000 for collection materials during each year of this agreement. Any increases in annual collection expenditures are to be consistent with other large branches and the collection shall be increased in size and scope to make it consistent with other large branches. The City shall have the opportunity to participate in the acquisition determinations. All collection materials shall be purchased specifically for the La Quinta Branch Library and housed at the La Quinta Branch Library. Collection materials purchased for the La Quinta Branch Library shall be the property of 294 007 the La Quinta Branch Library and be housed at the La Quinta Branch Library and shall not be permanently transferred or moved from the La Quinta Branch Library without the express written consent of the City. SECTION 4: LIBRARY FUNDING AND SERVICE The County will work cooperatively with City to design, construct and develop a library service plan for a new facility. The County will work cooperatively with the City to apply for grants from the state or other sources to assist in the construction of a new library facility. The County will transfer at least $590,863 in mitigation (or other funds) to the City for construction of a new library facility during the term of the MOU. Of this amount, $200,000 will be transferred by December 31, 2002; $200,000 will be transferred by December 31, 2003; and the balance will be transferred by December 31, 2004. The County will spend on City library services (including facility lease and all other facility expenses) or transfer to the City Library fund a guaranteed percentage of library revenues from City redevelopment pass -through agreements (does not include previously negotiated repayments), the library increment of the property tax, and the City portion of State -funded Public Library Foundation funds. The guaranteed percentage does not include the $590,863 in mitigation or other funds. An example of the funding sources and formula for Fiscal Year 2000-2001 is attached as Exhibit A. The guaranteed percentage per fiscal year will be as follows: Fiscal Year 2002/2003 - 76% Fiscal Year 2003/2004 - 81 % Fiscal Year 2004/2005 - 85% The County shall have an MLS Librarian serving full-time at the La Quinta Branch Library. Estimated annual expenditures by the County on library services (does not include facility lease or other facility expenses) shall total at least $220,000, generally distributed as follows: Labor and benefits $170,000 Automation Services $ 17,000 Courier Services $ 5,000 Shared Costs $ 18,000 Administrative Costs $ 5,000 Materials $ 5,000 County will work cooperatively with the City on library expenditures. The remaining balance shall be used to enhance the collection, furnishings, and equipment needs at the La Quinta Branch Library, or will be transferred to the City Library Fund. County will present revenues and expenses to the City for review prior to transferring funds to the City 295 008 Library Fund. The first transfer to the City Library Fund will be made by February 15 of each fiscal year. A second transfer will be made by June 30. A final reconciliation shall be completed by September 15 of the subsequent fiscal year to allow for any year-end fiscal closing procedures of the County. SECTION 5: CITY LIBRARY COMMITTEE In order to enhance City input on library matters, the City may create a City Library Committee ("Committee"). The purpose of the Committee shall be to review library operations and make recommendations on library operations including, but not limited to, collection purchases, equipment purchases, hours of operation, building location, and other library matters deemed appropriate for review by the Committee. The meeting locations and times shall be as set by the Committee. The County shall also have representation on this committee. The County and City will consider input from this committee to determine appropriate levels of library service. SECTION 6: CITY WITHDRAWAL FROM COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM; STATUS OF LIBRARY COLLECTION, FURNISHINGS, FURNITURE, ETC. If the City decides at a future date to withdraw from the County Library System, the City shall be granted the ownership of the then existing collection, equipment, furniture, or furnishings or for any collection materials, equipment, furniture or furnishing purchased prior to or during the term of this MOU for use at the La Quinta branch Library. In negotiations, City and County have agreed that in recognition of the City of La Quinta's contributions to the County Library System over the past years, City will be given full credit for the value of the library collection and equipment and will be granted ownership of the then existing collection and equipment without additional payment. a. To ensure seamless access to the City's library collection by Riverside County Library System patrons, City will strongly consider options to link its automated collection management system with the County's either (i) by contracting with the County for operation of the City's system, or (ii) by the City paying all costs to establish a fully interactive link between the City's automated system and the County's; and b. The City would endeavor to become a member of the Inland Library System preserving their citizens' access to holdings in other public libraries in the Inland area (and vice versa). SECTION 7: COMPLETE AGREEMENT Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is intended that this agreement/MOU sets forth the full and entire understanding of the parties regarding the matters set forth herein. 296 009 Any agreement, alteration, understanding, variation, waiver, or modification of any of the terms or provisions contained herein shall not be binding upon the parties hereto unless made and executed in writing by all parties hereto, and if required, approved and implemented by the La Quinta City Council and the County Board of Supervisors. The waiver of any breach, term or condition of this agreement/MOU by either party shall not constitute a precedent in the future enforcement of all its terms and provisions. The MOU is hereby executed and/or ratified by and between the following authorized representatives of the City and the County. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By Jim Venable Chairperson, Board of Supervisors ATTEST: Gerald A. Maloney Clerk of the Board Approved as to Form and Content WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN County Counsel By Deputy, County Counsel CITY OF LA QUINTA John J. Pena Mayor 297 010 EXHIBIT A Example of Funding Source and Formula City of La Quinta Library Revenues Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Property Tax Revenue Estimated Tax Estimated Tax after ERAF shift to State $186,073.16 $97,472 $ 97,472 Redevelopment Proj ect 1 Pass through $4799529 $4799529 Project 2 Pass through 197,361 $197,361 State Public Library Foundation Funds $1.657 per capita x Population (26,300) $43,579 Total Library Revenue 817 941 Formula: Total Library Revenue x Guaranteed Percentage = Amount to be spent within La Quinta on City Library Services or Deposited in City Library Fund • 16 Oil ATTACHMENT 3 Calculation of Estimated City Overhead Costs Legislative $ 582,800 City Manager's Office $ 613,200 $910,000 (Economic Development) Personnel/Risk Management $ 600,450 $1,796,450 City Clerk's Office $ 361,650 Fiscal Services $ 512,315 Central Services $ 306,205 $1,180,170 $2,977,620 Capital/Bond Items: Economic Development $ 910,000 Community Services $ 1,054,200 Police $ 3,812,1 18 Building & Safety $ 2,646,789 $1 10,500 Community Development $ 978,092 Public Works $ 3,631,310 $ 24,300 $13,032,509 RDA Project Area No. 1 $1,992,179 $18,677,878 RDA Project Area No. 2 $ 490,493 $ 9,339,686 $2,482,672 $15,515,181 Estimated Overhead: 19.2% ($21977,620/$15,515,181) 299 ATTACHMENT RESOLUTION NO.2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, NOTIFYING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS THAT IT NO LONGER DESIRES TO BE A PART OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FREE LIBRARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta ("City") has been participating in the Riverside County Free Library District ("District") since 1982; and the District, which is a district governed by the County of Riverside ("County") by and through the Board of Supervisors of the County ("Board of Supervisors"), derives funds from the payment of property taxes generated from property located within the territorial limits of the City, the amount of which includes property taxes paid directly to the District as well as property taxes paid directly or indirectly by other public entities to the District or to the County for the District's use; and WHEREAS, Education Code Section 19116 provides that a city council of any city within Riverside County may notify the Board of Supervisors that the city no longer desires to be a part of the county free library system; and WHEREAS, Education Code Section 19116 also provides that the notice must state whether the city intends to acquire any library facilities, and/or the personal property located therein, that are located entirely within the territorial boundaries of the city, and further provides that the acquisition prices of any facilities or personal property shall be in accordance with the costs set forth in the statute unless otherwise provide for by contract; and , WHEREAS, on or about August 18, 1998, the City and the County entered into that certain Library Memorandum of Understanding ("Existing MOU"), pursuant to which, among other terms, the County agreed that in the event the City decided to withdraw from the District, the City would be granted ownership of (i) the then -existing collection, furniture, and furnishings at the library branch operated by the District and located within the territorial limits of the City (the "La Quinta Branch Library"), and (ii) of any collection materials, furniture, and furnishings that had been purchased for the La Quinta Branch Library prior to or during the term of the Existing MOU; and WHEREAS, the Existing MOU is a "contract" pursuant to Education Code Section 19116, subdivision (c), that sets forth the acquisition prices pursuant to which the City will acquire (i) the then -existing collection, furniture, and furnishings at the La Quinta Branch Library, and (ii) any collection materials, furniture, and furnishings that had been purchased for the La Quinta Branch Library prior to or during the term of the Existing MOU. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. In accordance with Education Code Section 19116, subdivision (a), the City Council hereby notifies the Board of Supervisors for the County of Riverside: a. That the City no longer desires to be a part of the District. 300 882/015610-0019 207163.01 AM01 .101 1'3 Resolution No. 2001- Library Withdrawal Adopted: August 21, 2001 Page 2 b. That the effective date of City's withdrawal from the District shall be July 1, 2002. C. That the City intends to acquire (i) all of the collections, furniture, and furnishings existing at the La Quinta Branch Library as of the effective date of the City's withdrawal from the District and (ii) any collections, furniture and furnishings that have been purchased by the County for the La Quinta Branch Library prior to the effective date of the City's withdrawal from the District. d. That the acquisition prices for (i) the collections, furniture, and furnishings existing at the La Quinta Branch Library as of the effective date of the City's withdrawal from the District and (ii) any collections, furniture and furnishings that have been purchased by the County for the La Quinta Branch Library prior to the effective date of the City's withdrawal from the District shall be as set forth in the Existing MOU. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Resolution to the Clerk of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. 3. All actions required by applicable law to be taken by the City Council precedent to the adoption of this Resolution have been taken in accordance with applicable law. 4. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to take such other and further actions, and sign such other and further documents, as is necessary and proper in order to implement this Resolution on behalf of the City. 301 882/015610-0019 - 2 - 207163.01 AMO1 Old Resolution No. 2001- Library Withdrawal Adopted: August 21, 2001 Page 3 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this _ day of , 2001, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 882/015610-0019 207163.01 AM01 302 JUL-20-01 THU 12:14 PM EXECUTIVE OFFICE FAX NO, 909 9i MEMORANDUM ATTACHMENT 5 July 25, 2001 RIVERSIDE COUNTY COUNSEL TO. Gary Christmas, County Librarian Executive Office Michael O'Connor Exrcutive Office FROM: Lee A. Vinocour �RQ Deputy County Counsel La Quinta Library Withdrawal You have asked our opinion can the effect, if any, the withdrawal of the City of La Quinta from the County Free Library System might have on tho, existing Replacement Cooperation Agreement, involving redevelopment pass -through tax increment money to the County, We have researched this issue and offer the following opinion in two parts: 1. Repkwement Cooperation Agreement This agreement was entered into on Drcember 21, 1993, as a settl=cnt agreement to protracted litigation over the terms of the original SeGtI011 33401 pass -through agreement dated November 29, 1983. The settlement agreement bad two essential provisions: payment over time of all pass -through amounts owed, and payment of County'.s 100% share from and after Fiscal Year 1993-94 and for each Fiscal Year thereafter until the flan Expiration Date. The "County Share" of the past -due amount and future;, on -going amount includes a share for County Tree Library. There is no provision in the agreement that requires the County Frei; Library share be spent on facilities located exclusively within the city limits of the City of La Quinta. The City contends, through its attorneys, that provisions of a new law [an amendment to Section 19116 of the Education Coda might require payment of L-Lx increment to the City (not the Agency) if the City 1xithdraws from the County Free Iaibrary System. However, we believe the new, law would not impact the existing contract. The provisions of that contract were well negotiated and binding oil the parties. The new law speaks generally acid makes no mention specifically of the City of La Quinta or redevelopment tax increment. Further it is well established that the Legislature can pass any laws it Inay judge expedient, but subject Law Library Building 3535 Tenth Street•Suiie 300•Riversidu Cn.92501+(909)955-6300•F1tX (909)955-6322/955-6363 303 07-26-01 11:01 RECEIVED FROM:909 955 1105 P.02 JUL-2b-U l THU 12 :14 M EXECUT 1 VF 0Ff 1 CE FAX NO. 909 955 1105 P. 03 Gary Christmas Michael O'Connor July 25, 2001 Page 2 only to constitutional prohibitions. The Judiciary will set aside legislation impairing contract obligations and ex post facto laws and protect rights assailed thereby. Califomia Constitution Article 1. Section 9. A contract cannot be impaired or destroyed by subsequent legislation without violative both federal and state constitutions. If The City withdraws from County Free Library, under the new law it might receive the base year amount on behalf of its new library, but it would not be entitled to tax increment or any amounts owed under the contract. The new law is totally silent as to tax increment and would in any case not trump the Constitutional provision that tau increment belongs to a redevelopment agency. 2. 12edeyelopment Tax Increment. The settlement agreement and original pass - through agreement were negotiated under the provisions of former Section -13401 of the California Community Redevelopment Law. The settlement agreement doe's contain Section 17 which allows that the agreement may be amended at any time. Therefore, if the Board, the City and the City RDA mutually agree, it might be possible to reduce the pass -through to the County. However, the Executive Officer might carefiilly consider whether to recommend to the Board of Supervisors to surrender - in whole or ill part --thus obligation to pay the County its on -going and past -owed full share, which includes the County Free Library Share, If the Board does choose to surrender all or part of the County Free Library share of the County's share under the settlement agreement, then the City and City RDA should look to their otinn counsel to determine the character of those funds, An RDA is essentially a State agency operating at the local level and redevelopment agencies must submit an winual audit to the State. While the State might look away in Year 1, it could eery well decide in Year 3 or Year 7 that the way the City and City RDA deal with "suaTendered" tax increment from this agreement is an inappropriate use of RDA tax increment. While that is not our concern, there is a risk that our own County Auditor might be impacted since under the law he can only allocatu tax increment for legitimate indebtedness and to the appropriate taxing agencies. Therefore we offer the following additional thought. We believe that the new law only would implicate base year revenue not tax increment. Therefore if the settlement agreement amount is reduced, we believe that this reduced amount would flow to the City RDA, not the City. This reduced amount could not be used for maintenance or operations pursuant to the prohibitions of Section 33445 of the California Community Redevelopment Law. Please let us know if you have any fw1her questions regarding this matter. LA.V:cm Law Library Building 3535 Tenth Street•Suite 3009Riverside CA•9?5016(909)955-0300•FAX (909)955-6322/955-6363 07-26-01 11:02 RECEIVED FROM:909 9SS 110S P.OS 1 1 M T a 4tyl�l 4 4 Qum& COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the Initiation of Proceeding and the Assumption of Jurisdiction by the Coachella Valley Water District for the Acquisition of Certain Improvements Pursuant to the Provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 - Tract 24197 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council authorizing the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) to form proposed Assessment District No. 68 for Century Homes, Tract No. 24197 to pay water systems backup facilities charges and sanitation capacity charges related to that tract. No fiscal impacts to the City of La Quinta are associated with this action. None. On July 24, 2001, the CVWD Board of Directors passed Resolution No. 2001-121 requesting the consent of the City of La Quinta's City Council to allow CVWD to complete the formation of Assessment District No. 68. A copy of that Resolution is included as Attachment #1. A site map of the proposed Assessment District is also included as part of Attachment #1 . The purpose of the resolution presented for City Council action in this report is to allow CVWD to form an assessment district for Tract No. 24197. The assessment district will provide funding for fees and infrastructure associated with domestic water and sanitary sewer system. The assessment district will be formed under the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. In addition to the Century tract located in La Quinta, CVWD also proposes to include two other developments located in Rancho Mirage and Indian Wells in the assessment district. CVWD is working directly with those cities in the same manner as presented 305 TAPWDEPT\C0UNCIL\2001\010821 i.wpd here. CVWD will continue with assessment district preparations at only those locations where the respective City Councils have adopted a resolution approving the initiation of proceeding and assumption of jurisdiction as requested by CVWD. Pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, and the Streets and Highway Code, Section 10104, CVWD must submit a Resolution of Intention and a map indicating the extent of the territory included in the proposed Assessment District and receive the City's consent prior to the proceedings required for the formation of an Assessment District within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. CVWD desires to form Assessment District No. 68 to assist the developer with a funding mechanism to pay for water and sewer system infrastructure, and water system backup facilities charges and sanitation capacity charges for Century Homes Tract No. 24197. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council authorizing the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) to form proposed Assessment District No. 68 for Century Homes, Tract No. 24197 to pay water systems backup facilities charges and sanitation capacity charges related to that tract; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council authorizing the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) to form proposed Assessment District No. 68 for Century Homes, Tract No. 24197 to pay water systems backup facilities charges and sanitation capacity charges related to that tract; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respec fully submitted, Chris A. Vog ublic Work irector/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. CVWD Resolution No. 2001-121 306 TAPWDEPT\COUNCIL\2001\010821i.wpd 002 RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, APPROVING THE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND THE ASSUMPTION OF JURISDICTION BY THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913 - TRACT 24197 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Coachella Valley Water District (the "District") is contemplating the acquisition of certain improvements for the benefit of certain commercial property and Tract No. 24197 in the City of La Quinta (the "City") under the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, the consent of the City Council is required for the above proceedings; and WHEREAS, the District, in accordance with Section 10104 of the Streets and Highways Code, has submitted to this City Council the proposed Resolution of Intention and a map indicating the extent of the territory included in the proposed assessment district; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby approves of and consents to the initiation of proceedings and the acquisition of the improvements as described by said proposed Resolution of intention, for the benefit of the area shown on said map. SECTION 2. Said Resolution of Intention is approved with the understanding that said Resolution may be modified or amended in order to carry out the purpose of the assessment district and the consent of this City Council hereby is given to the exercise by the Board of Directors of the District of exclusive jurisdiction over all proceedings necessary thereto for the purpose of consummating the same, all in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. SECTION 3. The City Clerk of the City hereby is authorized and directed to certify to the adoption of this resolution and to deliver two certified copies thereto to the District. 307 T:\PWDEPT\C0UNCIL\2001 \010821 i.wpd U 0 3 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21s' day of August, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: John J. Pena, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 308 TAPWDEPT\COUNCIU2001 \010821 i.wpd V 0 4 ATTACHMENT 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE CONSENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA TO THE FORMATION OF AND THE ACQUISITION OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE BENEFIT OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 68 WHEREAS, this Board of Directors wishes to consider providing to certain commercial property and Tract No. 24197 in the City of La Quinta water supply capacity and sewer capacity in the Coachella Valley Water District's water system and sewer system, respectively, (the " Improvements" ) and to order the formation of an assessment district to pay the costs thereof under and pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, all as described in the proposed resolution of intention attached hereto as Exhibit A (the " Proposed Resolution of Intention" ); and WHEREAS, the proposed assessment district, if it is formed, is to be known and designated as Assessment District No. 68 (the " Assessment District" ); and WHEREAS, the property proposed to be included in the Assessment District is located in the Coachella Valley Water District and the City of La Quinta (the " City" ); and WHEREAS, under the circumstances described hereinabove it is necessary to obtain the consent of the City Council of the City before proceeding with the formation of the Assessment District and the ordering of the Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Coachella Valley Water District DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, RESOLVE, AND ORDER as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals, and each of them, are true and correct. SECTION 2. The Improvements are of such a character that it directly and peculiarly affects the commercial property and properties within Tract No. 24197 in a portion of the City which is proposed to be included in the Assessment District and which properties will be benefited by the Improvements. SECTION 3. The City Council of the City hereby is requested to 309 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 consent to the formation of the Assessment District, to the Improvements proposed to be acquired for the benefit of the commercial property and Tract No. 24197 in the City and to the assumption by the District of jurisdiction thereover for such purposes, all as described in the Proposed Resolution of Intention. SECTION 4. The Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to forward a certified copy of this Resolution, together with the Proposed Resolution of Intention and a•Map of the Assessment District, to the City Council of the City. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. (ATTEST: /s/ Julia Fernandez Acting Assistant Secretary of the Coachella Valley Water District and of the Board of Directors thereof /s/ John W. McFadden President of the Coachella Valley Water District and of the Board of Directors thereof 310 u07 EXHIBIT A PROPOSED RESOLUTION OF INTENTION RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO THE MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913, AND MAKE CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, ALL RELATING TO THE FORMATION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 68 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Coachella Valley Water District (the " District" ) desires to provide to certain noncontiguous developments located in the Cities of La Quinta, Rancho Mirage and Indian Wells, sanitary sewer system improvements and water system improvements, respectively, (the " Improvements" ) and to order the formation of an assessment district to pay the costs thereof under and pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (the " 1913 Act" ); and WHEREAS, the proposed assessment district, if it is formed, is to be known and designated as Assessment District No. 68; and WHEREAS,.the proposed boundaries of the Assessment District are shown on a map which indicates by a boundary line the extent of the territory proposed to be included in the Assessment District, which map is designated " Proposed Boundaries of Assessment District No. 68" (the "Map" ), which Map is on file in the office of the Secretary of the District; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has received from the owners of all of the property within the Assessment District.a petition regarding the formation of the Assessment District and waiving and requesting the District to dispense with any and all proceedings and all limitations required by the Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931; and WHEREAS, the District has requested and received from the City Councils of the Cities of La Quinta, Rancho Mirage and Indian wells consent to the initiation of proceedings for the formation of the Assessment District in their respective cities and the acquisition of the Improvements. 311 NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Coachella Valley Water District DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, RESOLVE, AND ORDER as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals, and each of them, are true and correct. SECTION 2. The Map is approved and the Secretary is authorized to record the Map in the office of the County Recorder, County of Riverside. SECTION 3. The Improvements generally include the construction of certain water system and sewer system facilities and the acquisition from the Coachella Valley Water District of water supply capacity and sewer capacity in the District's water system and sewer system, respectively, as described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof, for the benefit of the tracts described on Exhibit A and as shown on the Map and in the report of the District designated " Acquisition of Water System Capacity and Sewer System Capacity for Commercial Property and Tract No. 24197 in the City of La Quinta, Tract No. 29546-1 in the City of Rancho. Mirage -and Tract No. 29561 in the City of Indian Wells within Assessment District No. 68" which report is on file in the office of the Secretary. SECTION 4. The public interest and necessity require the Improvements, and the Improvements will be of direct benefit to the properties and land within the Assessment District. The Board of Directors hereby declares its intention to order the construction and acquisition of the Improvements, to make the expenses thereof chargeable upon the area included within the Assessment District, and to form the Assessment District. SECTION 5. The Board of Directors further declares its intention to levy a special assessment upon the land within the Assessment District in accordance with the respective special benefit to be received by each parcel of land from the Improvements. There shall be omitted from special assessments all public streets and alleys owned by the City of La Quinta, the City of Rancho Mirage and the City of Indian Wells as shown on the Map. In compliance with Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution, this Board of Directors finds that all public streets and alleys will receive no special benefit from the Improvements. 312 U09 SECTION 6. This Board of Directors finds and determines that before ordering the acquisition of the Improvements it shall take proceedings pursuant to the 1913 Act. SECTION 7. The General Manager -Chief Engineer is hereby appointed the Engineer of work and the Superintendent of Streets. the Assessment Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to make and file with the Secretary a written report with regard to the 1913 Act (the Report" ), which Report shall comply with the requirements of Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 8. Following the construction and acquisition of the Improvements and the payment of all incidental expenses in connection with the formation of the Assessment District and the issuance of bonds pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, any surplus remaining in the improvement fund established for the Assessment District shall be used as determined by the Board of Directors as provided in Section 10427 of the Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 9. Bonds bearing interest at a rate not to exceed 12 percent per annum will be issued hereunder in the manner provided in the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 to represent the unpaid assessments. The principal amount of such bonds maturing each year shall not be an amount equal to an even annual proportion of the aggregate principal amount of the bonds, but rather (except as specifically otherwise provided by the Board of Directors in connection with the sale of such bonds), shall be an amount which, when added to the amount of interest payable in each year, will generally be a sum which is approximately equal in each year (with the exception of the first year and any adjustment required with respect thereto). The last installment of such bonds shall mature a maximum of twenty-five (25) years from the second day of September next succeeding twelve months after their date. SECTION 10. The provisions of Part 11.1 of the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, providing an alternative procedure for the advance payment of assessments and the calling of bonds, shall apply. SECTION 11. The Board of Directors hereby determines that the District will not obligate itself to advance available funds from its 313 U10 treasury to cure any deficiency which may occur in the bond redemption fund established for the Assessment District. SECTION 12. It is hereby determined that the bonds proposed to be issued in these proceedings may be refunded. Any adjustment to assessments resulting from such refunding shall be done on a pro rata basis as required pursuant to Section 8571.5 of the Streets and Highways Code. Any such refunding shall be pursuant to the provisions of Division 11.5 (commencing with Section 9500) of the Streets and Highways Code, except that, if, following the filing of the report specified in Section 9523 and any subsequent modifications of the report, the Board of Directors finds that all of the conditions specified in Section 9525 are satisfied and that the adjustments to assessments are on a pro rata basis, the Board of Directors may approve and confirm the report and any, without further proceedings, authorize, issue, and sell the refunding bonds pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 9600) of Division 11.5 of the Streets and Highways Code. Any such refunding bonds shall bear interest at the rate of not to exceed twelve percent (12%) per annum, or such higher rate of interest as may be authorized by applicable law at the time of sale of such bonds; and the last installment of such bonds shall mature on such date as will be determined by the Board of Directors in the proceedings for such refunding. SECTION 13. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. ATTEST: Secretary of the Coachella Valley Water District and of the Board of Directors thereof President of the Coachella Valley Water District and of the Board of Directors thereof 314 Ali EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 1 Zone 2 Tract 29546- Tract 29461— Commercial Tract 24197— 1— 45 Lots 11 Lots Description of Property 206 Lots Vintage Colony Cove Improvements Vons, La Monticello, Estates— La Estates, Quinta La Quinta Terraza, Indian Wells Rancho Mirage Sanitary Sewer Improvements 10" VCP Sewer X Main (w/fittings) Join Existing X X Sewer Offsite Sewer Pro X Rata Share (less Developer Contribution) Water Improvements 24" DIP Water X Main (w/fittings) 18" DIP Water X X X Main (w/fittings) Butterfly Valve X Hot Tap and Sleeve X X Valve Well Site X X Improvements Park, Retention X Basin & Parkway Services Water and Sewer Fees Water Capacity Fee X X X ($2,400 per lot) Sewer Connection X X X Fee (1,925/lot less credit, if applic.) 315 012 LA QUINTA _ • DRI v FRED — yYARING � N e9�s•48- E _ t325.65 _ E I 1 j 60•I 1 PROPOSED - N45-25'46-W;27-O9'~ 1 - CJ TY PARK/ 1 RETENTION �• AREA I 20' LANDSCAPE LOT 1 5.06 ACRES T .. 2 PPQPOSED I all 1 I� t� C-aM7of ERCI AL 1 3 -1 TEin 0I �, , E In 7 0 1 vi 1 12 10.0 ACRES o r, 1 1 N89 31.36-E 551.70' co o� 10 N N in `r 1p N v in i a to 10 N— — _ — N I • 1 I - 1 1 � i 1 3 I 1 10 j 1 2 i 1 • I 6 � I C I ' I � I ]CO. II El A - - 1047.7.3- N 8931 "36' E 1 '126.89' AVENUE O MILES - .300 O 150 .300 500 I 1 I GRAPHIC SCALE 1 inch = 300 feet. 316 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ) ss. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY ) I, JULIA FERNANDEZ, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Coachella Valley Water District, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 2001-121 adopted by the Board of Directors of said District at a regular meeting thereof duly held and convened on the 24th day of July, 2001, at which meeting a quorum of said Board was present and acting throughout. Dated this 24th day of July, 2001. Acting/Assistant Secretary of th Coachella Valley Water District an (SEAL) of the Board of Directors thereof) 317 T a 4hf 4 4 Qum& AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Authorization for the City Manager to Enter into a Cooperative Agreement with the Coachella Valley Water District to Re- construct the L-3 Irrigation Pump Station Within the Limits of the Jefferson Street Improvements, Phase I - Avenue 54 to Highway 1 1 1, Project 99-05 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Authorize the City Manager to enter into a cooperative agreement with the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) to re -construct the L-3 irrigation pump station within the limits of the Jefferson Street Improvements, Phase I - Avenue 54 to Highway 1 1 1, Project 99-05. The following represents the project budget and funding sources: SB 300 (401-000-493-485) $713,41 1.00 Infrastructure Funds (401-000-493-000) $2,882,008.00 CVAG Funding (401-000-466-481) $12,589,513.00 TOTAL FUNDING: $16,184,932.00 The following summarizes costs for construction support: Project Design: $1,235,338 Construction Management: $444,494 Materials Testing/Field Survey: $141,635 Right of Way Acquisition: $1,557,863 Administration: $668,010 Total $4,047,340 318 TAPWDEPT\COUNCIL\2001 \010821 m.wpd The following represents a summary of the project construction budget: Base Construction Contract Amount: $6,866,566 Contract Change Order Nos. 1-43: $1,084,069 L3 Pump Station Estimate (Agreement Amount): $491,736 Revised Contract Total: $8,442,371 The construction of the L3 Pump Station is estimated to cost approximately $414,879.00. The cost of construction management is estimated at 7.75% or $32,154.00. Project contingency is included at 10% of the sum of construction and construction management, resulting in an estimated agreement amount of $491,736.00. Adequate funding is available to support staff's recommendation. None. The project was bid and is being constructed utilizing prevailing wages. On June 29, 1999, the City Council awarded a contract to construct Phase I of the Jefferson Street Improvement project to Granite Construction Company in the amount of $6,866,566.00. The contract provides for 300 consecutive calendar days in which to perform all tasks listed within the bid documents. On June 5, 2001, the City Council approved Contract Change Order No. 31 to eliminate the re -construction of the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) pump station located at Avenue 49 from the Jefferson Street Phase I construction contract. Specifically, CCO 31 omitted Items 89 - Concrete Work; 90 - Pump and Motors; 91 - Piping, Valves and Supports; 92 - Painting; 93 - Electrical Service/Motor Control Center; 94 - Other Electrical Lighting; and 95 - Site Work, Walls and Gates from Granite's construction contract. With the approval of the revised pump station plans pending, the Contractor informed the City that the pump station materials had a minimum 10 week lead time. In January 2001, the pump station drawings were approved by CVWD. In March 2001, the designer provided the City with an engineer's estimate for the work proposed within the CVWD approved plan revision in the amount of $414,879. Considering the estimated costs of the revisions, the long lead time for material deliveries, the delays to roadway construction, and the potential for extended overhead costs claimed by the Contractor, it was determined that deleting the contract items of work from the existing construction contract was in the best interest of the Project. 31 It was also intended that the revised pump station be bid and constructed as a stand T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2001\010821m.wpd u 0 2 alone project after Jefferson Street Phase I is complete. Considering that the proposed pump station is 100% located within the City of Indio's jurisdictional boundaries and will be owned and operated by CVWD, both Cities, CVAG and CVWD staff have collectively determined that the best approach for the - construction of the new pump station would be for CVWD to oversee and manage the construction activities. The proposed cooperative agreement would assign CVWD the responsibility of constructing the proposed pump station. The City of La Quinta will oversee and approve the costs incurred by CVWD and reimburse CVWD for eligible costs. The Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) has agreed to reimburse the City of La Quinta for 100% of these costs as part of the Jefferson Street Phase I Construction Reimbursement Agreement. As of the writing of this staff report, the details of the cooperative agreement are being negotiated. Staff is recommending that City Council authorizes the City Manager to enter into the cooperative agreement once drafted in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. CVWD has agreed to issue the City of La Quinta an encroachment permit to perform the temporary reconfiguration of the irrigation lines once the cooperative agreement is executed. Without the encroachment permit, the contractor cannot widen Jefferson Street to its planned width at Avenue 49. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a cooperative agreement with the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) to re -construct the L-3 irrigation pump station within the limits of the Jefferson Street Improvements, Phase I - Avenue 54 to Highway 1 1 1, Project 99-05; or 2. Do not authorize the City Manager to enter into a cooperative agreement with the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) to re -construct the L-3 irrigation pump station within the limits of the Jefferson Street Improvements, Phase I - Avenue 54 to Highway 1 1 1, Project 99-05; or 320 TAPWDEPT\COUNCIL\2001\010821m.wpd u 0 3 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respe fully submi ted,. Chris A. Vogt ublic Works D ctor/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 321 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2001 \010821 m.wpd ,04 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Consideration to Adopt Standard Drawings Related to Infrastructure Improvements in the City of La Quinta. AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving standard drawings related to infrastructure improvements constructed in the City of La Quinta. None. None. It is standard practice for governing bodies that own and maintain infrastructure to adopt and publish a set of standard drawings that detail the shape and configuration of various infrastructure components commonly constructed for common benefit and protection of the public. Doing so provides a number of benefits such as: • The drawings provide a convenient means for communicating design details that the City has adopted for implementation, and • The drawings provide a means for establishing a specific design detail, or method, for uniform use within the City, and • The drawings promote infrastructure uniformity within the City and enhance City plan review effort by avoiding time consuming review, evaluation, and discussion of competing alternate concepts that may or may not be in the City's best interest, and • California Government Code Section 330.6 provides design immunity for TAPWDEPTICOUNCIL\2001\010821h.wpd 324, agencies with respect to design standards that have been adopted by the governing body. The City adopted by reference the County of Riverside Standard Drawings shortly after City incorporation in 1982. Many of the infrastructure components detailed in the County standard drawings are ideal for continued use. In fact, infrastructure concepts detailed in forty-eight (48) County standard drawings are recommended for continued use and adoption in the proposed La Quinta standard drawings. Those forty-eight proposed standard drawings are a duplicate version of the County standard drawings and have been reproduced utilizing the La Quinta standard drawing format and logo. In addition to the County Standard Drawings, there are a number of standard drawings that have been developed over the years that are specific to the City. The newer standard drawings were created for the following reasons: • Some County standard drawings do not apply in the City of La Quinta because of variations between the City General Plan and the County General Plan with respect to street geometrics. In these instances, it is necessary for La Quinta to have its own standard drawings. • The County does not have a standard drawing to address certain infrastructure design details. Thus the City needs to adopt a standard to fill the void in the County standards. • In lieu of a collection of standard drawings from various agencies that are adopted by reference, it is less confusing and more efficient to adopt a set of City standard drawings that duplicate the standards used by other agencies. Doing so unifies the collection and provides a uniform .method of identity but at the same time does not create massive deviation from standard design concepts that are commonly used by other agencies. As already noted, forty-eight (48) of the proposed standard drawings are duplicate concepts carried over from the County standard drawings that the City was already using by reference. In addition to the County standard drawings, twenty-one (21) of the proposed standard drawings are duplicate concepts derived from the standard drawings published by the American Public Works Association (APWA). One proposed standard drawing is a duplicate concept derived from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) and nineteen (19) proposed standard drawings are original drawings containing concepts that are unique to the City of La Quinta. Of the nineteen (19) unique standard drawings, twelve (12) of the drawings are unique only because of street geometrics prescribed by the City General Plan. These twelve (12) drawings are non -sequentially numbered 100 through 153. The other seven (7) unique drawings are related to: 323 002 TAPWDEPT COUNCIL\2001\010821 h.wpd • Universal Widening Concept - Standard 190 • Sandfilter - Standard 370 • Transverse Trench Backfill & Paving Detail - Standard 600 • Longitudinal Trench Backfill & Resurfacing Requirement - Standard 601 • La Quinta Standard Drawing - Standard 990 • Approval Signature Block - Standard 991 Although the proposed La Quinta Standard Drawings establish city identity for efficient reference, there is very little real uniqueness with respect to design details in the drawings that would create broad controversy. La Quinta's Standard Drawings duplicate standard concepts that are widely used elsewhere in the Coachella Valley. As a result, the proposed standard drawings do not significantly vary with other infrastructure design concepts employed in the Valley, except for Standards 600 and 601 regarding trench backfill and pavement restoration requirements. These two standards have been a contested issue by the Building Industry Association (BIA) and utility purveyors for the past couple of years and has resulted in joint discussions involving all valley cities with respect to their pavement restoration requirements. On July 27, 2001, the CVAG Technical Transportation Advisory Subcommittee (TTAS) approved valleywide trench restoration standards that closely match La Quinta's standards 600 and 601. The only difference is the full pavement replacement from the trench edge to the gutter lip when the trench is within three feet (T) of the curb and gutter. This is referred to as the "floater strip" of pavement. Over a year ago, the Public Works Department transmitted a copy of the proposed standard drawings to the BIA for comment. The BIA conducted a meeting at City Hall that was attended by several contractors in the Coachella Valley. To date, the Engineering Department has received no written or oral comment from the BIA regarding the proposed standard drawings. During the August 7, 2001 City Council meeting, Mr. Ed Kibbey of the BIA stated his concern regarding Standard Drawing numbers 600 and 601. The concern was regarding references to Engineering Bulletin 98-07 and perceived discrepancies between the Engineering Bulletin and the Standard Drawings. Mr. Kibbey also did not agree with the engineering details in Standards 600 and 601. Since the Standard Drawings are able to stand alone without reference to Engineering Bulletin 98-07, the references to Engineering Bulletin 98-07 have been removed from Standards 600 and 601. The engineering details for Standards 600 and 601 are based on many engineering studies that have been completed by experts in the field. These standards have been utilized by the City for a number of years and have been an effective restoration procedure. Approval of these Standard Drawings does not preclude the City from continuing dialog with the BIA and other Agencies in the future for modifications. Based upon comments made during the City Council meeting, the following changes have been made to the Standard Drawings: 1) Standard 160 - "Typical Alley and .Alley Apron Sections" - The 2" x 4" redwood header was revised to 2" x 6" and noted as required only when specified on the project plans. 003 TAPWDEPT\C0UNCIL\2001\010821h.wpd 3 214 2) Standard 260 - " Equestrian Trail Easement Adjacent to Public Street" - A fencing detail was added between the equestrian trail and the street. 3) Standard 451 - "Fixed Object Placement for Interim Roadway Conditions" - The dimension notation from the edge of pavement to the fixed object was changed from 6" to 6'. 4) Standard 600, all five pages - Trench Restoration Standards - All references to Engineering Bulletin 98-07 were removed and trench lines were darkened on sheets 4 of 5 and 5 of 5 for better visibility. The proposed standard drawings, as currently presented, show an approval date of 00/00/00 for the purpose of demonstrating format style. Upon receiving City Council approval, staff will place the actual approval date on the drawings prior to publishing the standard drawings for use and public circulation. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving standard drawings related to infrastructure improvements constructed in the City of La Quinta; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving standard drawings related to infrastructure improvements constructed in the City of La Quinta; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfull su itted, rb1 A. Vogt Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: .f Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Proposed La Quinta Standard Drawings 325 004 TAMDEFRCOUNCIU2001\010821 h.wpd RESOLUTION NO. 2001- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF LA QUINTA APPROVING STANDARD DRAWINGS RELATED TO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta adopted the County of Riverside Standard Drawings shortly after City incorporation in 1982 as a means for maintaining efficient continuity in the early years of cityhood; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to adopt a set of standard drawings that establish city identity for easy reference and provide an efficient means for maintaining and updating City standards as needed and when needed; and WHEREAS, City staff has prepared ninety-nine standard drawings for adoption as listed on Exhibit A. WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works/City Engineer has reviewed the standard drawings and has already approved each of them. WHEREAS, in the professional opinion of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, a registered civil engineer, the standard drawings are reasonable. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: Section 1. All ninety-nine standard drawings listed in Exhibit A are approved for use in the City of La Quinta. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 21 st day of August, 2001, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Council Members NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None JOHN J. PENA, Mayor 326 005 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON , City Attorney City of La Quinta, California City of La Quinta, California 327 006 EXHIBIT A LA QUINTA DWG DESCRIPTION REFERENCE- KEY STD DWG# AGENCY STD DWG # STREETS & ALLEYS 100 HIGHWAY 111 LA QUINTA 100 110 MAJOR ARTERIAL "A" LA QUINTA 110 115 MAJOR ARTERIAL "B" LA QUINTA 115 120 PRIMARY ARTERIAL "A" LA QUINTA 120 125 PRIMARY ARTERIAL "B" LA QUINTA 125 130 SECONDARY ARTERIAL-88' R/W LA QUINTA 130 140 COLLECTOR "A" 74' R/W LA QUINTA 140 145 COLLECTOR "B" 64' RNV LA QUINTA 145 150 LOCAL STREET 60' R/W LA QUINTA 150 151 LOCAL STREET 60' R/W LA QUINTA 151 152 LOCAL STREET 50' R/W LA QUINTA 152 153 LOCAL STREET 50' R/W LA QUINTA 153 160 TYP. ALLEY AND A. APRON SECT. R.C.T.D. 500 190 UNIVERSAL WIDENING CONCEPT LA QUINTA 190 CURBS, GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS, & DRIVEWAYS 201 6" CURB AND GUTTER R.C.T.D. 200 202 8" CURB AND GUTTER R.C.T.D. 201 203 TYPE "C" CURB R.C.T.D. 202 204 ASPHALT CONCRETE DIKES R.C.T.D. 212 205 CURB TRANSITION R.C.T.D. 211 208 CURB AND GUTTER JOINTS R.C.T.D. 205 210 6" MEDIAN CURB R.C.T.D. 204 220 DRIVEWAY LOC. AT INTER. CURB RET. R.C.T.D. 208 221 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APPROACH R.C.T.D. 207 225 COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY R.C.T.D. 207A 230 CROSS GUTTER LAYOUT R.C.T.D. 209 231 CROSS GUTTER (TYPIAL SECTION) R.C.T.D. 209A 240 SIDEWALK AND CURB R.C.T.D. 401 241 CURB SIDEWALK JOINTS A.P.W.A. 112-0 245 MEANDERING SIDEWALK R.C.T.D. 404 250 CURB RAMP CASE A R.C.T.D. 403 260 EQ. TRAIL EASMNT. ADJ. TO PUB. ST. R.C.T.D. 405 DRAINAGE 300 (1 of 2) CURB INLET CATCH BASIN NO. 1 R.C.T.D. 300 300 (2 of 2) CURB INLET CATCH BASIN R.C.T.D. 300A 301 COMB. INLET CATCH BASIN NO.2 R.C.T.D. 301 302 (1 of 2) COMB. INLET CATCH BASIN NO. 3 R.C.T.D. 302 302A (2 of 2) COMBINATION INLET CATCH BASIN SPE. R.C.T.D. 302A 310 CURB SUPPORT DETAIL R.C.T.D. 304 311 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE FRAME AND A.P.W.A. 312-1 32$ � 00 LA QUINTA DWG DESCRIPTION REFERENCE KEY STD DWG# AGENCY STD DWG # 312 MANHOLE FRAMES AND COVERS R.C.T.D. 608 315 GRATE AND FRAME DETAIL R.C.T.D. 305 320 CURB OUTLET R.C.T.D. 308(1,2) 321 PRIVATE DRAIN THROUGH CURB R.C.T.D. 310 322 CURB DRAIN A.P.W.A. 150-1 323 RECTANGULAR FRAME AND COVER A.P.W.A. 152-0 330 GUTTER DEP. FOR CURB OPEN. C. BAS R.C.T.D. 311 331 GUTTER DEP. FOR GRATE OPEN. C. B. R.C.T.D. 312 340 MANHOLE PIPE TO P. (MAIN L. ID=3611) A.P.W.A. 320-0 341 MANHOLE PIPE TO PIPE (ID=3311) A.P.W.A. 321-0 342 MANHOLE PIPE TO P. LARGE S. INLET A.P.W.A. 322-0 343 MANHOLE -CONCRETE BOX (storm drain) A.P.W.A. 323-0 350 JUNCT. STRUCT.P. TO P. INLET ID>26" A.P.W.A. 331-0 351 JUNCT. STRUCT.-PIPE TO P. (ID<24) A.P.W.A. 332-0 352 JUNCTION STRUCTURE -PIPE TO RCB A.P.W.A. 333-0 353 JUNCT STRUCT. PIPE TO RCB (ID<30") A.P.W.A. 334-0 354 TRANSITION STRUCTURE PIPE TO PIPE A.P.W.A. 340-0 360 AS. OVERSIDE DRAIN R.C.T.D. 306 370 SAND FILTER LA QUINTA 370 GEOMETRICS 401 OFFSET CUL-DE-SAC R.C.T.D. 800 401 OFFSET CUL-DE-SAC R.C.T.D. 800 (A) 405 STANDARD KNUCKLE R.C.T.D. 801 410 PROP. LINE -CORNER C.B., CURB R. RA R.C.T.D. 805 415 MEDIAN TAPER A.P.W.A. 140-1 416 MEDIAN FLARE A.P.W.A. 141-0 420 CONCRETE BUS PAD A.P.W.A. 131-0 450 LOC. OF CABLE TV DUCTS AT ST. INT. R.C.T.D. 819 451 FIXED OBJ. PLMENT FOR INT. RWY COND. R.C.T.D. 820 452 S/W, FIRE H., & UTILITY POLE LOCAT. R.C.T.D. 400 TRAFFIC SIGNS & STRIPING 500 STREET NAME SIGN R.C.T.D. 816 505 STREET NAME SIGN POST L.A.C.D.P.W. 1920-0 ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS 600 TRANS. TRENCH BACKFILL & PAVING DET. LA QUINTA 600 601 LONG. TRENCH BACKFILL & RESURF. REQ. LA QUINTA 601 620 BARRICADE R.C.T.D. 810 630 MULT. MAILB. INST. FOR NEW S/W R.C.T.D. 812 631 MULT. MAILB. INST. FOR EXIST. S/W R.C.T.D. 813 635 TYPICAL WATER METER INSTALLATION R.C.T.D. 700 329 008 LA QUINTA DWG DESCRIPTION REFERENCE KEY STD DWG# AGENCY STD DWG # 636 FIRE HYDRANT INSTALLATION R.C.T.D. 701 637 VALVE BOX, FRAME AND COVER R.C.T.D. 703 650 BUS TURNOUT R.C.T.D. 814 LANDSCAPING 700 TREE -STAKING A.P.W.A. 518-0 705 TREE WELL A.P.W.A. 519-1 710 SHRUB AND TREE PLANTING A.P.W.A. 520-0 711 TREE ROOT BARRIER A.P.W.A. 522-0 750 PRESSURE REGULAR INSTALLATION A.P.W.A. 521-0 MONUMENTING 800 TIE -OUT STANDARDS R.C.T.D. 900 801 STREET CENTERLINE MONUMENT R.C.T.D. 901 802 TYPE "B" MONUMENT R.C.T.D. 903 DRAFTING 001 TITLE PAGE LA QUINTA 001 990 LA QUINTA STANDARD DRAWING LA QUINTA 990 991 APPROVAL SIGNATURE BLOCK LA QUINTA 991 330 009 1 0 -10 R/W 70' 70' R/W 0 50' 12 58' 58' 12' 50' 62' 45' 26' 45' 62' G) GENERAL CROSS SECTION 58' 58' 8' 12' 12' 13' 26' 13' 12' 12' 8' 0 0 Q MID—ULMR LAML TVIUMQ 58' 58' 8' 12' 12' 13 15' 12' 12' 12' 12' 8' STRIPING NOTES 1D Coltrane detail 12 © Coltrane detail 38 GENERAL NOTES LANE WIDTHS AT INTERSECTION Q DETAIL NOTES 1 The City General Plan calls for a landscape setback 30 Coltrane detail 279 0 area adjacent to the right of way. OMeandering sidewalk shall be constructed In right of way. and In blanket easement for sidewalk purposes covering landscape setback area. 1. Highway 111 Is a State Highway administered by Coltrane. The Information on drawing represents the City of La Qulnta understanding of Coltrane. REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 O Refer to Standard 201 regarding parkway and landscape setback grading design requirements. O See standard 201 for curb and gutter detail. O The City has constructed a 0.55' AC on 0.80' CL 2 AB structural section for some Highway 111 projects. However. Highway 111 Is a State Highway. please check with Coltrane for actual design requirements. © This Ions width configuration applies only If traffic study Indicates additional Is" turn or right turn lanes are not needed. 010 CV `M or STANDARD 100 HIGHWAY III 339 SHEET 1 OF 1 R/W 50' gp' R/W O5 O ' 12' 48' 48' 12' 2O' 32' 39' 18' 39' 32' 0 GENERAL CROSS SECTION 0 48' 48' 5' 11 11 12' 18 12' 5' 0 0 1O O MID —BLOCK LANE WIDTHS "1 48' 5' 11 11 12' 7' 12' 11 11 11' 5' 0 0 LANE WIDTHS AT INTERSECTION 6Q STRIPING NOTES vk t� Coltrane detail 12q�4k 3Q Caltrans detail 39 �2 Coltrane detail 38 Vy'� Q CaMrans detail 39AIk GENERAL NOTES 1, See Standard 180 for specific design parameters regarding this street classification. 2. See Standard 181 for spacing requirement regarding access connections to streets in this classification. REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 DETAIL NOTES OSound bowler height for residential areas shall be determined by noise study. Maximum allowable exposed wall face is six (6) feet. If sound barrier height Is higher than six feet. wall must be placed on earthen berm. OMeandering sidewalk shall be constructed In right of way. and In blanket easement for sidewalk purposes covering landscape setback area. Refer to Standard 160. O Refer to Standard 161 regarding parkway and landscape setback grading design requirements. O See standard 201 for curb and gutter detail. OThe City General Plan calls for a landscape setback area adjacent to the right of way. © This lane width configuratlon applies only If traffic study Indicates additional Jeff turn or right turn lanes are not needed. 01.1 a Ccli . , a 2 5 f .01 4 MAJOR ARTERIAL "A" 33 STANDARD 110 SHEET 1 OF 2 • • R/W R/W 63' 67' g' 54' 58' 9' 5' 11 11 12' 1 4' 10' 1 11' 11' 11 1 V 4' 11' LANE WIDTHS AT INTERSECTION WITH: 1. Dual left turn lanes 2. Exclusive right turn Ions R/W R/W 60' 64' 12' 48' 55' 9' 5' 11 11' 12' 7' 12' 11' 11' 11' 4' 11' LANE WIDTHS AT INTERSECTION WITH: 1. Exclusive right turn Ions 012 REVISIONS: APPROVED G STANDARD 00/00/00 st i f = v�v CHRIS A. VOGT or 40 (4p 1.10 CITY ENGINEER 3 3 4 RCE 44250 MAJOR ARTERIAL °A SHEET 2 OF 2 • 0 R/W 60' 60• R/W 20' , 9' , 51' - - - , 51' , 9' , 20' , 29' , 44' , 14' , 44' , 29' , 0 10 �6o 0 GENERAL CROSS SECTION 51' i 51' 7 12' 12' 13' 14' 13' 12' 12' 7' 0 MID —BLOCK LANE WIDTHS 51' 51 7' 12' 12' 13' 3' 12' 12' 12' 12' 7' .0 0 © 6 6 LANE WIDTHS AT INTERSECTION DETAIL NOTES STRIPING NOTES O Sound barrier height for residential areas shall be 1Q Coltrane detail 12 30 Coltrane detail 39 determined by noise study. Maximum allowable exposed wall face Is six (6) feet. If sound barrier QZ Coltrane detail 38 40 Coltrane detail 39A height Is higher than six feet, wall must be placed on earthen berm. O Meandering sidewalk shall be constructed In right of GENERAL NOTES way. and In blanket easement for sidewalk purposes covering landscape setback area. Refer to Standard 160. 1. See Standard 180 for specific design parameters 3 O Refer to Standard 151 regarding parkway and regarding this street classification. landscape setback grading design requirements. 2. See Standard 181 for spacing requirement regarding O See standard 201 for curb and gutter detail. access connections to streets In this classification. O The City General Plan calls for a landscape setback area adjacent to the right of way. © This lone width configuration applies only if traffic study Indicates additional left turn or right turn 013 lanes are not needed. REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 a s cu e 4'� STANDARD 115 MAJOR ARTERIAL "B ° 3 3 SHEET 1 OF 2 LIA • R/W � R/W 65' 74' 9' 56' 65' 9 7' 12' 12' 13' 3' 10' 12' 12' 12' 12' 4' 12' LANE WIDTHS AT INTERSECTION WITH: 1. Dual left turn lanes 2. Exclusive right turn lane R/W rL R/W 60' 69' 9' 51' 60' 9' 7' 12' 12' 13' 3' 12' 12' 1 12' 12' 4' 12' REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 LANE WIDTHS AT INTERSECTION WITH: 1. Exclusive right turn Ian• scu� s wr �. �r Of 4 014 STANDARD 115 MAJOR ARTERIAL "B " 336 SHEET 2 OF 2 • • R/W 55' . 55' R/W 0 O5' 12' 43' 43' 12' 20' 32' 34' 18' 1 34' 32' GENERAL CROSS SECTION 43' 43' 8' 13' 13' 18' 13' 13' 8' MID —BLOCK LANE WIDTHS 43' 43' 8' 13' 13' 7' 12' 12' 13' 8' T LANE WIDTHS AT INTERSECTION Q8 DETAIL NOTES STRIPING NOTES O Sound barrier height for residential areas shall be 1� Coltrane detail 12 30 Caltrons detail 39 determined by noise study. Maximum allowable e Is six lx tee sound height Is higher osewall cthan st. wall must be placed 12 Caltrons detoll 38 Q4 Caltrons detail 39A on earthen berm. OMeandering sidewalk shall be constructed In right of way. and In blanket easement for sidewalk purposes covering landscape setback area. Refer to Standard GENERAL NOTES 160. 1. See Standard 180 for specific design parameters O Refer to Standard 161 regarding parkway and landscape setback grading design requirements. regarding this street classification. O See standard 201 for curb and gutter detail. 2. See Standard 181 for spacing requirement regarding access connections to streets in this classification. The City Gencalls o setback e of r l la area right ofway.landscape © This lane width configuration applies only If traffl- study Indicates additional left turn or right turn lanes ore not needed. 015 f VISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 STANDARD 120 PRIMARY ARTERIAL "All 3 3 SHEET 1 OF 1 • 0 RAW 50. RAW 50' O 20' 12' 38' 38, 12' 1 20' 32' 32' 12' 32' 32' GENERAL CROSS SECTION 38' 38' 7' 12' 13' 12' 13' 12 7. MID —BLOCK LANE WIDTHS 38' 1 38' 13' 2' 11' 12' 12' 7' D ,rffl ( 0 LANE WIDTHS AT INTERSECTION DETAIL NOTES STRIPING NOTES Sound barrier height for residential areas shall be determined by noise study. Maximum allowable 10 Caltrans detail 12 30 Caltrans detail 39 exposed wall face Is six (6) feet. If sound barrier height is higher than six feet. wall must be placed 02 Caltrans detail 38 4Q Caltrans detail 39A on earthen berm. OMeandering sidewalk shall be constructed In right of way, and In blanket easement for sidewalk purposes GENERAL NOTES covering landscape setback area. Refer to Standard 160. 1, See Standard 180 for specific design parameter O Refer to Standard 161 regarding parkway and landscape setback grading design requirements. regarding this street classification. 2. See Standard 181 for spacing requirement regarding 4Q See standard 201 for curb and gutter detail. access connections to streets In this classification. O The City General Plan calls for a landscape setback area adjacent to the right of way. © This lone width configuration applies only If traffic study Indicates additional left turn or right turn lanes are not needed. 016 REVISIONS: APPROVED ails STANDARD 00/00/00 Z � s f 4. CHRIS A. VOGT Of ` 125 CITY ENGINEER 33 RCE 44250 PRIMARY ARTERIAL "B" SHEET 1 OF 1 C R/W RAW 44' 44' 0 0 1 p' 12' 32' 32' 12' 10' 0 oTII�- � -i GENERAL CROSS SECTION. 14' 12' 12' 1 12' 14' MID —BLOCK LANE WIDTHS 14' 12' 12' 1 12' 1 14' LANE WIDTHS AT INTERSECTION 0 F-6--I o _11 DETAIL NOTES STRIPING NOTES 1 0 Sound barrier height for residential areas shall be 1D Caltrons detail 9 3 Caltrons detail 22 0 determined by noise study. Maximum allowable exposed wall face Is six (6) feet. If sound barrier �2 Caltrons detail 16 Q4 Caltrons detail 38 height Is higher than six feet. wall must be placed on earthen berm. OMeandering sidewalk shall be constructed in right of way. and In blanket easement for sidewalk purposes covering landscape setback area. Refer to Standard GENERAL NOTES 160. O Refer to Standard 161 regarding parkway and landscape setback grading design requirements. 1, See Standard 180 for specific design parameters regarding this street classification. O See standard 201 for curb and gutter detail. 2. See Standard 181 for spacing requirement regarding O The City General Plan calls for a landscape setback access connections to streets In this classification. area adjacent to the right of way. © This Ions width configuration applies only If traffic turn study Indicates additional left turn or right lanes are not needed. 0 REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 $ � s • aAr4 tM O e1 a SECONDARY ARTERIAL - 88 ' R / W STANDARD 130 SHEET 1 OF 1 R/W 37' 37' R/W 10' 12' 25' 25' 12' 10' GENERAL CROSS SECTION O 7' 18' 18' 7# MID —BLOCK LANE WIDTHS 7' 12' 12' 12' 7' 0 0 LANE WIDTHS AT INTERSECTION 6Q STRIPING NOTES DETAIL NOTES 1Q Coltrane detail 2 40 Caltrons detail 38 O Sound barrier height for residential areas shall be determined by noise study. Maximum allowable �2 Caltrons detail 39 5Q Coltrane detail 39A exposed wall face Is six (6) feet. If sound barrier �3 Coltrane detail 22 height Is higher than six feet. wall must be placed on earthen berm. OMeandering sidewalk shall be constructed In right of way. and In blanket easement for sidewalk purposes covering landscape setback area. Refer to Standard GENERAL NOTES 160. 0 Refer to Standard 161 regarding parkway and i. See Standard 180 for specific design parameters landscape setback grading design requirements. regarding this street classification. O See standard 201 for curb and gutter detail. 2. See Standard 161 for spacing requirement regarding O The City General Plan calls for a landscape setback access connections to streets In this classification. area adjacent to the right of way. © This lane width configuration applies only If traffic study indicates additional left turn or right turn lone* are not needed. 018 REVISIONS: APPROVED �. �,` STANDARD 00/00/00 FF �.:T140 f `M O CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER �� 3 113.1- - RCE 44250 COLLECTOR A 741 R 1 W SHEET 1 OF 1 • • R/W 32, R/W 32' 5 O 1100' 12' 20' 20' 12' 10' 0 O O O F-----i 3 s �---i GENERAL CROSS SECTION 20' 20' MID —BLOCK LANE WIDTHS 15' 12' 13' Q 0 LANE WIDTHS AT INTERSECTION STRIPING NOTES 1� Coltrane detail 2 3� Caltrons detail 38 04 Coltrane detail 22 GENERAL NOTES 1, See Standard 180 for specific design parameters regarding this street classification. 2. See Standard 181 for spacing requirement regarding access connections to streets In this classification. DETAIL NOTES OSound barrier height for residential areas shall be determined by noise study. Maximum allowable exposed wall face Is six (5) feet. If sound barrier height Is higher than six feet, wall must be placed on earthen berm. OMeandering sidewalk shall be constructed In right of way, and In blanket easement for sidewalk purposes covering landscape setback area. Refer to Standard 160. O Refer to Standard 161 regarding parkway and landscape setback grading design requirements. O See standard 201 for curb and gutter detail. OThe City General Plan calls for a landscape setback area adjacent to the right of way. © This .lone width configuration applies only If traffic study Indicates additional left turn or right turn lanes ore not needed. 019 REVISIONS: APPROVED STANDARD 00/00/00 ` CHRIS A. VOGT `"°f 145 CITY ENGINEER �- RCE 44250 COLLECTOR ° 8 " 64 ' R 1 w SHEET 1 OF 1 0 • 0 • R� R/W /W 30' 30, 12 ' 18, 18, 12' 36' 59 � I ----I 0 GENERAL CROSS SECTION GENERAL NOTES 1. See Standard 180 for specific design parameters regarding this street classification. 2. See Standard 181 for spacing requirement regarding access connections to streets in this classification. DETAIL NOTES O See Standard 202 for sidewalk dstall. O See Standard 201 for curb and gutter dstall. 0 See Standard 161 regarding parkway grading and landscaping requirements. 021 REVISIONS: APPROVED STANDARD 00 / 00 / 00-'-'--' 4cu $ s � ` OF 151 CHRIS A. VOGT f "`� CITY ENGINEER 3 RCE 44250 LOCAL STREET f 0 w R SHEET 1 OF 1 C� • 1� �J u R/W R/W 25' 25' g� 16' 16' g' 32' GENERAL CROSS SECTION GENERAL NOTES 1, See Standard 180 for specific design parameters regarding this street classification. 2. See Standard 181 for spacing requirement regarding access connections to streets In this classification. REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 DETAIL NOTES 1O See Standard .202 for sidewalk detail. OSee Standard 201 for curb and gutter detail. O See Standard 161 regarding parkway grading and landscaping requirements. a * I a � � s .*o LOCAL STREET 50' R/W 344 022 STANDARD 152 SHEET 1 OF 1 • • • R/W 25' 25' R/W 79 18 18' 7" 3 6' 51 3 5'"� �� 0 O GENERAL CROSS SECTION 0 GENERAL NOTES 1, See Standard 160 for specific design parameters regarding this street classification. 2. See Standard 181 for spacing requirement regarding access connections to streets In this classification. REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 DETAIL NOTES O See Standard 202 for sidewalk detail. OSee Standard 201 for curb and gutter detail. See Standard 161 regarding parkway grading and landscaping requirements. LOCAL STREET 50' R/W 34 5)_ 023 STANDARD 153 SHEET 1 OF 1 R Ft/V1l 20' MINIMUM A 1/2 WIDTH 1/2 WIDTH RM RM B A.C. PAVEMENT CLASS "B"kONCRETE N B ALLEYPRON ------------ EXPANSION JOINT EXPANSIONIJOINT SIDEWALK Z I SIDEWALK I �1= I CURB FACE-4'`--'i `„ GU R - I�-4''---►i CURB FACE r PLAN 2" x 6" REDWOOD HEADER i 2" x 6" RAN 20' MI IMUM RNV REDWOOD 1/2 WIDTH 1/2 WIDTH HEADER LEVEL LINE 0.40' 2 1/2" MINIMUM i 4" MINIMUM BASE A.-C. PAVEMENT SECTION A -A 20' MINIMUM SIDEWALK 1/2 WIDTH 1/2 WIDTH SIDEWALK i 6" MIN. o EXPANSION JOINT SECTION B-B EXPANSION JOINT 0 Ln o ALLEY WIDTH AS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. Z WHEN REQUIRED OR PERMITTED '�E CIE REQUIRED ONLY IF SPECIFIED ON PROJECT PLANS co 0 024 U . Q REVISIONS: APPROVED STANDARD 00/00/00OF j s • CHRIS A. VOLT f '•' tWf 160 CITY ENGINEER TYPICAL ALLEY AND ALLEY RCE 44250 APRON SECTIONS SHEET 1 OF, • • C� C T O M HE SEE DETAIL BELOW 0.1' OVERLAY EXISTING PAVEMENT 0.A' OVERLY EXISTING p pVEMENt STREET CLASSIFICATION MAJOR ARTERIAL A STANDARD 110 M 9' T 39' C 48' MAJOR ARTERIAL 8 115 7' 44' 51' PRIMARY ARTERIAL A 120 9' 34' 43' PRIMARY ARTERIAL B 125 6 32' 38' SECONDARY ARTERIAL 130 6' 26' 32' DETAIL NOTES OTaper overlay thickness from 0.1 foot to zero In 2.5 feet of width. OStructural section per standard drawing for Intended street classification. OSaw cut edge of existing pavement. sheetsY^ OSee standard drawing for Intended classification for striping configuration In the travel way. REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 STRIPING NOTE O Coltrane detail 29 cu TAT 4 Qumra UNIVERSAL WIDENING CONCEPT 025 STANDARD 190 SHEET 1 OF 1 • • R 3/8" ROADBED WIDTH TO THIS POINT i i 6" 111211 SURFACING ' i i R1 i 24" ' i i 6 CURB FACE D 1/4" D - D D R 3/4" j D �- D 121/2" A • A A • A ' 0- 0 D p D D D off D D D D D D D D D D p D • LEVEL LINE 31 1 /2" CLASS "B" CONCRETE 1.601 C U. FT. / L.F. 1 CU. YD. = 16.66 L.F. MINIMUM PERMISSIBLE GRADE IS 0.50% UNLESS SPECIFIC APPROVAL IS GIVEN BY THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO DESIGN. 2" NOTE: IF AN EXIST. EXPANSION JOINT IS 10' OR LESS AWAY FROM THE DIMENSIONED JOINT, REMOVE EXIST. CURB TO THE EXIST. EXPANSION JOINT IN LIEU OF THE SAW CUT. 026 APPROVED rSHEET NDARD 00/00/0061 j S4 CHRIS A. VOGT ~o' 20 1 CITY ENGINEER �� T TER RCE 44250 6 CURB AND GU 1 OF 1 • R 3/8" ROADBED WIDTH TO THIS POINT ; 61 2 SURFACINC R 1" 24" 2% ---► 0 8" CURB FACE 3/41' ' D D ,1 Y D p R 3/4" D D 14 1/2" , p , • A , • L1 p D D V LEVEL LINE 32" CLASS "B" CONCRETE 1.73 CU. FT. / L.F. 1 CU. YD. = 15.60 L.F. MINIMUM PERMISSIBLE GRADE IS 0.50% UNLESS SPECIFIC APPROVAL IS GIVEN BY THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO DESIGN. 0 N O Z O co 0 REVISIONS: 2" NOTE: IF AN EXIST. EXPANSION JOINT IS 10' OR LESS AWAY FROM THE DIMENSIONED JOINT, REMOVE EXIST. CURB TO THE EXIST. EXPANSION JOINT IN LIEU OF THE SAW CUT. 027 PROVED STANDARD p00/00/00 s - , vv R'V CHRIS A. VOGT Of 4 202 CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 811 CURB AND GUTTER 3494 TSHEET 1 OF 1 0 2'-2° 1'-7 3/16 " ROADBED WIDTH TO THIS POINT i w ; z ; cl) i ry i z i wI I z I � I I 1" I R1 I SURFACING i TOP OF CURB ------------ , R 1"-- " i _- ------------- v -�----------------------------------------- ' • 411 311 its 10 IF IF • p p • v ° • • IF�• r (MIN.) • • . • ' • 7„ • ..°, •11-611 ° • , �• • . r r , r 1� 2'-4' i i i CLASS "B" CONCRETE 0 a 1.418 CU FT. / L.F. Z NOTE: IF AN EXIST. EXPANSION JOINT 1 CU. YD. = 19.05 L.F. c IS 10' OR LESS AWAY FROM THE co co DIMENSIONED JOINT, REMOVE MINIMUM PERMISSIBLE GRADE IS 0.50 % UNLESS EXIST. CURB TO THE EXIST. SPECIFIC APPROVAL IS GIVEN BY THE CITY ENGINEER EXPANSION JOINT IN LIEU OF PRIOR TO DESIGN. THE SAW CUT. O28 c� REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 � s CU �r Of STANDARD 203 TYPE n C n CURB 3501 SHEET 1 OF 1 0 0.25' 0.42' 0.25' 1/4" PER F ROADBED WIDTH TO THIS POINT ; i i i i i i i 6" A.C. DIKE 1 /4 11 PER 0.33' 0.42' 0.33' FOOT SLOPE N yll O Z 0 0 U Q REVISIONS ROADBED WIDTH TO THIS POINT i i i i i i i 8" A. C . Dl KE %•J APPROVED �STANDARD 00/00/00 5 a CHRIS A. VOGT 3 rJ 204 CITY ENGINEER ASPHALT CONCRETE DIKES RCE 44250 SHEET 1 OF 1 • TYPE licit TYPE "A-6" OR CURB 10 MIN. TRANSITION LENGTH "A-8" CURB BACK OF CURB - - - - - - -F::�ROLL --------- ===--=---=--------_--------------�Q_----�, 000 SECTION 000 _ " 000 000 - _-- FLAT SECTION TYPE licit CURB— REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 EXPANSION JOINT PLAN VIEW TYPE "A-6" OR "A-8" CURB CLASS "B" CONCRETE MAINTAIN GUTTER GRADIENT ISOMETRIC VIEW 4 � I jFF 6j Of t 4 030 STANDARD 205 CURB TRANSITION 3 5 2 SHEET 1 OF 1 *I Ln 0 N O Z C F- GUTTER Ar— - • EXPANSION I JOINT ' I A-f--- 10'-0" CURBFACE Br--• WEAKENED PLANE I JOINT ' I 10'-0" TOP OF BUR WEAKENED PLANE JOINT TYPICAL PLAN VIEW 0 REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 TOP OF FILLER 1/4" BELOW SURFACE ° v R 1 /4" R 1 /4" : ° • . • . • • ' • .. V. r • PREMOLDED v ° • JOINT FILLER • • • • 1 /2" —►i SECTION "A -A" EXPANSION JOINT EXPANSION JOINTS TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL B.C.'S, E.C.'S, CURB RETURNS, AND STRUCTURES. f1 3/16"--►il�-- 111 SECTION "B-B" WEAKENED PLANE JOINT 10' INTERVAL BETWEEN TRANSVERSE JOINTS MAY BE VARIED TO ALLOW MATCHING OF JOINTS IN ADJACENT EXISTING INMPROVEMENTS. 031 a 0 STANDARD , Q cu 44 Of.-� 208 F„y CURB AND GUTTER JOINTS 35 SHEET 1 OF-1 0 REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 u n r%Tt l Tr1 T1._110 Dn I KIT -J 1 I I CLASS "B" CONCRETE 0.888 C U FT. / L.F. 1 CU. YD. = 30.41 L.F. MINIMUM PERMISSIBLE GRADE IS 0.50 % UNLESS SPECIFIC APPROVAL IS GIVEN BY THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO DESIGN. 032 STANDARD n s • CU j Of 210 6" MEDIAN CURB 3541 SHEET 1 OF 1 EDGE OF DRIVELL WAY 0 5 (MIN.) F— (RESID.) �I Q------ ------------------- -------------------- 0 ; w TOP OF CURB 0 . , ' 10 / CURB FACE w • RIGHT OF WAY �-=— GUTTER 150' (MIN.) (COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL) 5' (MIN.) (RESID.) RESIDENTIAL ONLY: NO PORTION OF ANY DRIVEWAY SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHIN 5' OF THE POINTS OF CURVATURE. co 0 a COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL: c NO PORTION OF ANY DRIVEWAY SHALL BE PERMITTED Z WITHIN 150' OF THE CENTERLINE OF AN INTERSECTING STREET OR AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. co 0 033 REVISIONS: APPROVED STANDARD 00/00/004 3 scu CHRIS A. VOGT VOf 220 CITY ENGINEER DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS AT 3 RCE 44250 INTERSECTION CURB RETURNS SHEET 1 OF 1 r • u- i Oj 0 WEAKENED PLANE I I w _ 1 1 JOINT AT 5 INTERVALS j 1 Wo 0 0 1 1 / RNA RNV w R/ihl 1 --- - - Q !/ I LLI OJ LLJ Q Q W C7 0w CD 04 Z_aw W j // TFI �w cry �c°0=/ (xL T Z 0 > W co 6- RESIDENTIAL 12' MIN. 3V MAX. 6' 2' COMMERCIAL 24' MIN. 40' MAX. M N. WHEN NO SIDEWALK WITH SIDEWALK EXISTS OR IS NOT REQUI RED NOTES: 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS "B" CONCRETE. 2. 20' OF FULL HEIGHT CURB REQUIRED BETWEEN DRIVEWAYS WITHIN ANY ONE PROPERTY FRONTAGE. El 1, 0 N O Z O 0 H U Q REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 034 4 �W STANDARD 221 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 356 APPROACH SHEET 1 OF 1 4' MAXIMUM 20' 20' MINIMUM MINIMUM -01 u U. 1' MIN. MEDIAN DETAIL I 23' 12' 1- 24' MINIMUM 12' 23' R/VV a 0 N O Z C F- CD C REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 O�� 40' MAXIMUM ABC RB�\� i 23' OF 'Qo� ADDITIONAL RIW — PROVIDE ACCESS RAMPS PER CITY OF LA QUINTA STD. No. 250 COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY .._ RNV 035 STANDARD f 225 f'M Of COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY 357 SHEET 1 OF 1 VARIABLE '; — 0 10 IT D R 25' MIN. ;_____ ` Q/3 RIGHT OF WAY-v Q/3 VARIABLE TYPE "A-6" OR "A-8" CURB AND GUTTER _ CURB FACE CURB FACE GUTTER GUTTER TOP OF CURB I TOP OF CURB t 5 t 1' 7 1' 8-) O-J 3' 6) (6) (9 1O CROSS GUTTER FOR USE WITH TYPES "A-6" AND "A-8" CURB. O2 APRON THICKNESS TO BE 6" MINIMUM. O3 CROSS GUTTER THICKNESS TO BE 6" MINIMUM. O4 CLASS "B" CONCRETE. O PLACE 6" BASE UNDER ENTIRE SPANDREL AREA. O WEAKENED PLANE JOINTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT 1/3 POINTS ON 25' RADIUS SPANDRELS, AND AT 1/4 POINTS ON 35' RADIUS SPANDRELS. 7O CONSTRUCT WEAKENED PLANE JOINT(S) PER STANDARD #208 AT MIDPOINT OF CROSS GUTTERS LESS THAN 40' LONG, OR AT 1/3 POINTS OF CROSS GUTTERS OF 40' OR LONGER. O8 THIS PORTION OF SPANDREL AND CROSS GUTTER SHALL HAVE AN ADDITIONAL 6 INCHES OF CLASS "B" CONCRETE. O9 CONSTRUCT EXPANSION JOINT PER STANDARD # 208. 10 CONSTRUCT WEAKENED PLANE JOINT PER STANDARD # 208. 11 CONSTRUCT CROSS GUTTER PER STANDARD # 231. o) o N O Z G . O 036 REVISIONS: APPROVED f STANDARD 00/00/00 a j S CHRIS A. VOGT �M230 CITY ENGINEER CROSS GUTTER LAYOUT 358 RCE44250 ISHEET'l OF i E C COMPACTED SUB -GRADE SURFACING 4" MIN. a 0 N O Z C N F REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 I l7�WVCL Vf� or�uG �n�� i�f�� CROSS GUTTER - 17' 17I - LEVEL LINE 6" MIN. '• CROSS GUTTER � COMPACTED SUBGRADE CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 i i i GRAVEL OR BASE MATERIAL SURFACING 4" MIN.. 037 STANDARD TAY,,, 4 XoP QuAr4 231 R'M Of CROSS GUTTER (TYPZCAL 35.9 SECT ION 1 SHEET 1 OF 1 • VARIES 6' 5'-4 1/2" IF 6" C.F. 611 51-4" IF 8" C.F. v � SIDEWALK ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS "B" CONCRETE. T o NOTE: Z AGGREGATE BASE OR APPROVED SELECT MATERIAL WHEN SOILS REPORT INDICATES PRESENCE OF EXPANSIVE SOIL CONDITIONS. 0 U REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 ROADBED WIDTH TO THIS POINT 1 1/2"IF 6" C.F. 2"IF8"C.F. Jim STANDARD 3Twit 4 44� 094�qr4 t f v, 240 SIDEWALK AND CURB SHEET 1 of 1 L:111 C� • a a ¢ w 3 3 A �A x v ✓ W ACCESS RAMP ' EXP JT EXP JT BCR __rV I .. I I DRIVEWAY W P J = WEAKENED PLANE JOINT EXP JT = EXPANSION JOINT BCR = BEGINNING OF CURB RETURN ECR - END OF CURB RETURN W P J NN OT E_S_: 1. WF AKENED PLANE JOINTS SHALL BE USED FOR ALL JOINTS. EXCEPT EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED IN CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK AT THE BCR AND ECR, AND AROUND TREE WELL UTILITY POLES LOCATED IN SIDEWALK AREAS. r 2. CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED SEPARATELY FROM SIDEWALK. W P J_ 3. WEAKENED PLANE JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT REGULAR INTERVALS, NOT 1 EXCEEDING 10 FEET IN WALKS OR 20 FEET IN GUTTERS. WALK AND -CURB JOINTS wPJ �Pj SHALL BE ALIGNED. CURB GUTTER EXP JT O N T r ACCESS RAN O Z O F- N Q 3 a Q REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 Li a x 3 W 039 STANDARD cu R - R 4 241 � Of mw� SIDEWALK JOINTS 361 CURB SI SHEET 1 0F 1 R=600' MIN, 1000' MAX. V TO FL • 3';IN. -CF CF - R=3' 14' TO 20' 5_MY 20' SIDE WALK 11' TO 71Z EASEMENT PARKWAY R=600' VARIES 180' TO 220' R=1000' VARIES 240' TO 280' LANDSCAPING NOT CITY MAINTAINED TO BE MAINTAINED BY OTHERS (ONLY SIDEWALK MAINTAINED BY THE CITY) NOTES: 1. RADII FOR CURVED SIDEWALK SHALL BE BETWEEN 600' AND 1000'. 2. ALL RADII SHALL BE STAGGERED. 3. EASEMENT REQUIRED FOR SIDEWALK THAT EXTENDS BEYOND RIGHT OF WAY LINE. c 4. SIDEWALK SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF V IN WIDTH ADJACENT TO CURB RETURNS AND BUS STOPS. 5. SIDEWALK SHALL BE 3' AWAY FROM CURB FACE EXCEPT AT CURB z 6. SIDEWALK LAYOUT ON PLANS IS CONCEPTUAL ONLY. APPROVAL OF THE FINAL SIDEWALK • LAYOUT SHALL BE MADE IN THE FIELD AND ADJUSTED AS NECESSARY TO MEET FIELD c co CONDITIONS AS APPROVED BY THE INSPECTOR PRIOR TO FINAL CONSTRUCTION. c H c� REVISIONS: APPROVED w 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 m 4 .4` STANDARD 4 of 2.45 MEANDERING SIDEWALK 3 6 SHEET 1 OF 1 1/2 DELTA --------- BCR•-- 4 DELTA I 40 ��. o l \\ A WEAKENED PLANE JOINT �� (SEE NOTE 8) \ U w EXPANSION JOINT ' `— (SEE STD. NO. 208)- ` A O CURB AND GUTTER PER U STD. NO.201 OR 202 8, 0 0 0 z —6'TOFL EXPANSION JOINT (SEE STD. NO.208) CROSSWALK 4' MIN. SEE TABLE X ON SHEET 3 RAMP CONSTRUCTION SHALL INCLUDE CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK FROM BCR TO ECR 10' 4_ I SEE NOTE 13 2' 2' Y (SEE TABLE Y BELOW) 4' MINIMUM MAX. TOP OF RAMP ROUNDED (SEE NOTE 1) FLUSH (SEE NOTE 4) _____-_ --, 2%-_- ----- .: 8.33 0 ,• • ,. 4"MIN. TABLE Y CF Y 6" 7.90' 8" 10.53' SCOLD JOINT "'SEE NOTE 9 SECTION A -A cn CURB FACE (FT.) Y c 6.33% �U REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 041 #e.rlof 0 STANDARD 250 363 SHEET 1 OF 4 CURB RAMP CASE A 1/2 DELTA 6' TO FL ��\ —' —------- BCR•-- DELrA �� EXPANSION JOINT j �� (SEE STD. NO. 208) O cn '� WEAKENED PLANE JOINT I �� (SEE NOTE S) �i9��• CROSSWALK 4' MIN. EXPANSION JOINT � � � A SEE TABLE X ON SHEET 3 (SEE STD. NO. 208) Y RAMP CONSTRUCTION cn N O SHALL INCLUDE CURB CURB AND GUTTER PER ix U AND GUTTER AND STD. NO. 201 OR 202 8' SIDEWALK FROM SEE NOTE 11 AND DETAIL BELOW BCR TO ECR 10' _I _ 4' SEE NOTE 13 CONSTRUCT RETAINING 2' 2' CURB UNLESS MAX. OTHERWISE SPECIFIED FLUSH f— 2% (SEE NOTE 4) % PVMT / r 2% MAX. ' 4" MIN COLD JOINT SEE NOTE 9 0 0 z c F- co c REVISIONS: SECTION A -A 1.6711 �-- 2.35'f 1.67" -® ® ® 2.35" APART � ® ® ®APART A*x > RAISED TRUNCATED DOME PATTERN 0.45"-H llaj0.20" 0.90 -�{ �' 0 RAISED TRUNCATED .DOME DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE SEE NOTE 11 APPROVED a 00/00/00 _cu s ty Of 4 CHRIS A. VOGT 3 CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 1 CURB RAMP CASE B 042 STANDARD 250 SHEET 2 OF 4 • 0/4 -TOP OF CURB 0/2 TC GRAoE TC --- A CE o �3olu CF=003 F /4 r-r r + _ r _ O _ �S�OQ o1oa L=FL WLI TC o/ S�o� S I 5�0 ,� OR 8 330p� CF FL ' I X 4' X NMI SHORT APRON (LONG 15' MAX.) PROFILE TABLE X CF RADIUS SIDE TC GRADE (ALONG CURB RETURN) IN SLOPE X 1 % 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% XS 4.6 4.2 3.9 3.6 3.4 3.2 6" 35' 10% XL 5.6 6.3 7.2 8.4 10.0 12.5 XS 6.1 5.6 5.2 4.8 4.5 4.2 $" 35' 10% XL 7.5 8.4 9.6 11.2 13.4 15.0 XS 5.4 4.9 4.5 4.1 3.8 3.5 6" 25' 8.33% XL 6.9 7.9 9.4 11.6 15.0 15.0 XS 7.2 6.5 5.9 5.5 5.0 4.7 $ 25' 3OR 5' 8.33% X L 9.1 10.6 12.5 15.0 15.0 15.0 TO CALCULATE "X" DIMENSION: SHORT SIDE (DOWN SLOPE): LONG SIDE (UP SLOPE): CURB FACE (FT) CURB FACE (FT) SIDE SLOPE + TC GRADE XS (FT)= XL (FT) SIDE SLOPE - TC GRADE ENGINEER TO SHOW XS AND XL ON IMPROVEMENT PLANS 0 3/4" IN 12" BORDER Z 1/491 1-1/2" IN 4' APRON 6 �---1 /4" GROOVING DETAIL REVISIONS: 043 APPROVED �^ STANDARD 00/00/00 j g :. �� E'w CHRIS A. VOGT of.,4 250 CITY ENGINEER 3 65 RCE 44250 CURB RAMP SHEET 3 OF 4 • CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. IF DISTANCE FROM CURB TO BACK OF SIDEWALK IS TOO SHORT TO ACCOMODATE RAMP AND 4' LANDING, THEN THE SLOPE OF THE FLARED SIDE SHALL NOT EXCEED 8.33%. ONLY 6" CURBS WITH 35' RAUDII MEET REQUIRE IB 33°E SIDE SLOPE.NTS FOR /S SIDE SLOPES. ALL OTHER CURBS 2 IF SID IEWALK SHALLBE DEPRESSED ADALK IS LESS THAN 6- WIDE, THE FULL WIDTH OF THE S SHOWN IN CASE B 3. THE RAMP SHALL HAVE A 12" WIDE BORDER WITH AND 1/4" DEEP APPROXIMATELY 3/4GROOVES 1/4 WIDEIDE " ON CENTER. SEE GROOVING DETAIL: 4. TRANSITIONS FROM RAMPS TO WALKS, GUTTERS, OR STREETS SHALL BE FLUSH AND FREE OF ABRUPT CHANGES. 5. WHEN RAMP IS LOCATED IN CENTER OF CURB RETURN, IT SHALL BE GROOVED IN A HERRINGBONE PATTERN WITH GROOVES 1/4" WIDE AND 1/4" DEEP APPROXIMATELY 1-1/2" ON CENTER. SEE GROOVING DL PARALLEL TO CROSSWALK LINES TO DIRECT VISUALLY IMPAIRED PEDESTRIANS INTO THE CROSSWALK. 6. RAMP SIDE SLOPE VARIES UNIFORMLY F AMAXIMUM SIDEWALK TO 10% AT CURB TO CONFORM WITH LONGITUDINAL SLOPE ADJACENT TO TOP OF THE RAMP (EXCEPT IN CASE B). 7. WHERE SPACE LIMITATIONS PROHIBIT THE USE OF A 8.33% RAMP SLOPE, THE SLOPE MAY BE INCREASED UP TO 10% FOR A MAXIMUM RISE OF 6 INCHES. (REDUCES RAMP LENGTH Y DIMENSION BY 1.32'). 8. CONSTRUCT WEATEPLANE JOINTS AT 1/4 DELTAS ENS DE EDGE O GROOVED BORDER WHEN RADIUS EQUALS 35' AND RADIUS EQUALS 25'. 9. IF EXPANSIVETED OVER CLASS 2 AGGREGATE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED GATE MATERIAL. 10. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS B. 11. CURB RAMPS THAT HAVE A RAMP SLOPE FLATTER THAN SHALL HAVE A DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE THAT EXTENDS THE FULL WIDTH OF THE RAMP AND 24" MINIMUM LENGTH, SIMILAR TO THAT SHOWN ON CASE B WITH DETAIL. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES, AT THEOPTION OF THE CONTRACTOR, SHALL BE CAST -IN --PLACE OR STAMPED CONSTRUCTED BY ETHOD. c 12. WHEN A DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE IS NOT REQUIRED ON A CURB RAMP, OR WHEN RAMP IS NOT LOCATED IN CURB RETURN, o THE CONCRETE FINISH OF THE RAMP AND ITS FLARED SIDES SHALL HAVE A TRANSVERSE BROOMED SURFACE TEXTURE z ROUGHER THAN THE SURROUNDING SIDEWALK. 13. MAXIMUM SLOPES OF ADJOINING GUTTERS, THE ROAD SURFACE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE ' SHALL NOT EXCEED 5O/oNTINUOUS PASSAGE TO THE CURB RAMP WITH N 4' OF THE TOP OR BOTTOM OF THE CURB RAMP. U [C REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00cu CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 CURB RAMP CONSTRUCTION NOTES 044 STANDARD 250 SHEET 4 OF 4 ?'1 STREET R/W ■ ■ TRAIL EASEMENT 10' MIN. 4 (" \� 2%° ► 36" HIGH PVC "SPLIT" RAIL FENCE WITH TWO RAILS PARKWAY 10' MIN. VARIABLE i l / J W ■ Z I Q� ■ � LL] o U I Qo W 2 O 2%► a O LLI O SIDEWALK 2% P.C.C. CURB 0 w 6' oc O RADED SHOULD E -j 2%�► ✓ A.C. DIKE 045 REVISIONS: APPROVED ;'� �� STANDARD 00/00/00 5 s CHRIS A. VOGT °cMOF ` 260 CITY ENGINEER EQUESTRIAN TRAIL EASEMENT RCE 44250 ADJACENT TO PUBLIC STREET 3 HEET 1 OF 1 • FRAME 23 3/4" OPENING T T EXCEPT FOR REINFORCING 211 211 BAR SHOWN ADJACENT TO FRAME, REINFORCE TOP SLAB 3,� Q� 3" H NO. 3 BARS SPACED 6 WITH " , FL -► 4 io 2" CLEARANCE (TYP) BACK OF CURB L-[ GUTTER EXPANSION JOINT PARKWAY COVER & FRAME STD. NO. 312. Ill ll L- .�rt11-Ittt , tttt fi� ANCHOR CURB DEPRESSION R=4" ��;TTfTT_L��_T1TiT` 1 1/2" OR AS NOTED I�4+414 4414 Lff lu-4-1-1144 �- FL �.� V-0" MIN. GUTTER —�� 4'-0" MIN. OPENING �'- �Q�' p OPENING TO BE SPECIFIED c� Q� ON IMPROVEMENT PLAN. c SEE NOTES - STD. 300. EXPANSION JOINT -v SEE STD. 330 FOR " GUTTER DEPRESSION a 1 TYP. rSEE STD. NO.310 FOR DETAIL OPENING NORMAL GUTTER FLOWLINE 6" —� NO.4 BARS @ 18" C-C _ . uu /n" c&AOCr%&ACAIT 4 1/2" 1/2" CLEAR TYPICAL z I I ---►I T .3' . T I�-- cn SECTION A -A CATCH BASIN SHALL BE CLASS "A" P.C.C. *TOP OF CATCH BASIN TO BE POURED MONOLITHIC WITH SIDEWALK, 6 FT. REVISIONS: APPROVED a� 00/00/00 5 s :: 1 v CHRIS A: VOGT .01 CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 CURB I NL E T CATCH BASIN N0.1 368 oas STANDARD SHEET 1 OF 2 CONNECTION PIPES MAY BE PLACED ANY POSITION AROUND THE WALLS, PROVIDED THEY POINT IN THE PROPER DIRECTION AND THE POSITION IS OTHERWISE CONSISTENT WITH THE IMPROVEMENT PLAN. CURV ATURE OF THE LIP AND SIDEWALLS AT GUTTER OPENING SHALL BE FORMED BY CURVED FORMS AND SHALL NOT BE MADE BY PLASTERING. DIMENSIONS: T = 6" IF H IS 8 FEET OR LESS. T = 8" IF H IS GREATER THAN 8 FEET AND LESS THAN 20 FEET. H = 3 FEET 6 INCHES, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. FLOOR OF BASIN SHALL BE GIVEN A STEEL - TROWELLED FINISH. MANHOLE SHALL BE PLACED AS SHOWN ON STANDARD NO.300, UNLESS NOTED DIFFERENTLY ON IMPROVEMENT PLANS. OUTLET PIPE SHALL BE TRIMMED TO THE FINAL SHAPE AND LENGTH BEFORE CONCRETE IS POURED. OPENING SHALL BE 4'-0" UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. REINFORCI NG STEEL SHALL BE NO.3 ROUND DEFORMED BARS IN TOP SLAB AND NO.4 BARS AT 18" CENTERS IN THE SIDES OF BOX. STEPS: 3/4 INCH PLAIN ROUND GALVANIZED STEEL STEPS (ALHAMBRA FDY. A-3320 OR EQUAL) ARE REQUIRED AS FOLLOWS: IF H IS 3.5 FEET OR LESS, NO STEPS ARE REQUIRED. IF H IS MORE THAN 3.5 FEET, AND NOT MORE THAN 5 FEET, INSTALL 1 STEP 16" ABOVE FLOOR OF BASIN. IF H IS MORE THAN 5 FEET, INSTALL STEPS 12 INCHES APART, WITH THE TOP STEP 6 INCHES BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE BASIN. WHICH SHALL BE 2 112 INCHES (CLEAR) FROM ALL STEPS SHALL BE 4 INCHES FROM THE WALL, EXCEPT THE TOP STEP, THE WALL, AND ANCHORED NOT LESS THAN 5 INCHES IN THE WALL OF THE BASIN. SURFACE OF ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE IN BASIN SHALL CONFORM IN SLOPE, GRADE, COLOR, FINISH AND SCORING TO EXISTING OR PROPOSED CURB AND WALL ADJACENT TO THE BASIN. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS "A" WHEN THE BASIN IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF ITPOSEDWITH SIDS WALKIDEWAO, USING IS CONTIGUOUS TO SUCH A SIDEWALK THE TOP OF THE BASIN SHALL BE POURED MONOLITHIC Q USING CLASS "A CONCRETE IN THE SIDEWALK AND THE TOP OF THE CATCH BASIN FINISHED PER SIDEWALK STANDARDS. 0 0 0 0 z c H- 369, 047 REVISIONS: APPROVED STANDARD 00/00/00 _ cu 300 ey Of CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 CURB INLET CATCH BASIN N0.1 SHEET 2 OF 2 • C7 SPACING cn SCORING LINE # 4-BARS o ANCHOR 7" 71�17��I J � X WII o a `o LI / ran e r � Lj e LINE FOR TIE SEE STD. 310 FOR CURB SUPPORT DETAIL _ � o O N ANCHOR Z SCORING LINE' Q T ADDITIONAL ANCHOR BOLT IN FRAME / �, ^" I1 1 I C i.7 THE OUTER EDGES OF THE WALLS SHALL CONFORM TO THE STREET OR LOCAL DEPRESSION SURFACE. THE GRATING SHALL BE LAID IN THE PLANE OF THIS SURFACE, SEE STD. NO. 331 CASE B FOR GUTTER DEPRESSION. PLAN 8" cnll i f -.0 C111 #3 BAR DETAIL OF DOWEL Y 4' SEE STD. 315 FOR B-0—; FRAME & GRATING ' W / ANCHOR BOLTS ____--- EXIST. ST. 4— ANCHOR = �„ T BOLT 3" RADIUS B� SLOPE TO OUTLET FROM ALL DIRECTIONS SECTION "A -A" TOP OF ADDITIONAL — CURB --I ANCHOR.BOLT •: 6" RADIUS T—►1= CURB FACE N i N� FLOW T LINE W —► NOTES: 1. DIMENSIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED y W T H 3'41 21311 7' CIE 6"* 4' 6" 6" V OR LESS SECTION "B-B" 8" VTO8' 10" V OR GREATER 2. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS "A" PO TLAND CEMENT CONCRETE NUMBER 4 DEFORMED BARS(CLEARANCE SHALL BE 1 1/2" FROM 3. THE REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE THE BOTTOM OF THE SLAB. 4. THE SURFACE OF ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO SLOPE, GRADE COLOR, FINISH, AND SCORING IN THE EXISTING OR PROPOSED CURB AND WALK ADJACENT TO THE BASIN. THE BASIN FLOOR SHALL BE GIVEN A TIGHT WOOD FLOAT FINISH. CURVATURE OF THE LIP AND SIDEWALLS AT THE GUTTER OPENING SHALL NOT BE MADE BY PLASTERING. THE OUTLET PIPE SHALL BE TRIMMED TO cr) FINAL SHAPE AND LENGTH BEFORE THE CONCRETE IS POURED. 5. STEPS: 3/4" PLAIN ROUND NON -GALVANIZED STEEL STEPS, OR MATERIAL AS APPROVED BY THE CITY Z ENGINGEER, SHALL BE INSTALLED 16 INCHES APART WHEN H EXCEEDS 4 FEET 6 INCHES. c THE TOP STEP SHALL BE 6 INCHES BELOW THE TOP SURFACE AND SHALL BE 2 1/2 INCHES CLEAR N FROM THE WALL. ALL OTHER STEPS SHALL BE 4 INCHES CLEAR OF THE WALL. ONLY ONE STEP 1 INCHES FROM THE BOTTOM SHALL BE INSTALLED IF H IS 4 FEET 6 INCHES OR LESS. ALL STEPS SHALL BE ANCHORED NOT LESS THAN 4 INCHES INTO THE WALL OF THE BASIN. 3 70 o4s U Q REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 COMBINATION BASIN INLET NO 2 CATCH STANDARD 301 SHEET 1 OF 1 n ALHAMBRA FDY. A-33200 OR EQUAL (GALVANIZED) •-►i 7 1 /2" �-► A I `fM'l ►in A nccnDkAGn RAPS SEE NOTES VUK PLACEMENT OF NORMAL CURB FACE AT EXP. JOINT. T.C. & FL. ELEV. AS SPECIFIED ON ---..- w. ..If% CONNECTION PIPE FOR CURB BAR 8, SUPPORT DETAILS SEE STD. NO. 310 }�- FOR FRAME & GRATING DETAILS rAND ANCHORAGE SEE STD. NO. 315 1 I 4 -0NORMAL GUTI FLOW LINE 6 q3/4 1 �k=r R=3" _ .. 1/2" : V 04 co •. -_ - - zT 2I-9,o T B' 1/2" STEEL BOLTS & LOCK WASHERS GRATE SLALACE TS) EN TOTAL - 4 - T o- 3" MINIMUM EMBEDMENT 6,f j SLOPE TO OUTLET IN ALL DIRECTIONS ca _SECTION A -A c CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS "A" P.C.C. REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE ' 44250 ?w U? O (D � otS 5WF185J SECTION B-B 44 ` Of COBINATION INLET CATCH BASIN NO a 3 049 STANDARD 302 SHEET 1 OF 2 • Ll I NOTES: BASIN SHALL HAVE ONE GRATING UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON IMPROVEMENT PLANS. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS "A". WHEN THE BASIN IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF A PROPOSED SIDEWALK, OR IS CONTIGUOUS TO SUCHALK, THE CONCREOP OF THE BASIN TE IN THE SIDEWALK. LTHE BE POURED MONOLITHIC WITH THE SIDEWALK, USING CLASS TOP OF THE CATCH BASIN SHALL BE FINISHED PER SIDEWALK STANDARDS. CONNECTION PIPES MAY BE PLACED IN ANY POSITION AROUND THE WALLS, PROVIDED THEY POINT IN THE PROPER DIRECTION AND THE POSITION IS OTHERWISE CONSISTENT WITH THE IMPROVE- MENT PLAN. CURVATURE OF THE END -WALLS AT CURB OPENING SHALL BE FORMED BY CURVED FORMS AND SHALL NOT BE MADE BY PLASTERING. DIMENSIONS: GRATE SHALL BE PARALLEL TO PLANE OF GUTTER SLOPE 3/4" TO T-O". T = 6 INCHES IF H IS 8 FEET OR LESS. T _ 3 FEET 6 INCHES,, 8 INCHES IF H IS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON IMPROVEMENT PLANS. EATER THAN 8 FEET AND LESS THA H - UNL W = 2 FEET 11 3/8 INCHES FOR ONE GRATING. ADD 3 FEET 5 3/8 INCHES FOR EACH ADDITIONAL GRATING. EXPOSED SURFACES OF THE CATCH BASIN SHALL CONFORM IN SLOPE, GRADE, COLOR, FINISH AND SCORING TO EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT TO THE BASIN. WHERE NO SIDEWALK EXISTS, THE TOP SHALL BE FINISHED TO CONFORM TO STANDARD SIDEWALK SLOPE AND FINISH. WHERE NO CURB EXISTS, THE BATTER OF EXPOSED END WALLS ABOVE THE STREET SURFACE SHALL CONFORM TO BATTER FOR STANDARD CURB. FLOOR OF BASIN SHALL BE GIVEN A STEEL - TROWELLED FINISH. OUTLET PIPE SHALL BE TRIMMED TO THE FINAL SHAPE AND LENGTH BEFORE CONCRETE IS POURED. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE NO.4 DEFORMED BARS. CLEARANCE SHALL BE 1 1/2 INCHES FROM INSIDE OF BOX. SPACING IS AS SHOWN IN TOP SLAB AND AT 18 INCH CENTERS IN SIDES OF BOX. SLOPE OF FLOOR PARALLEL WITH CURB SHALL BE 1 IN 12 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. SLOPE FLOOR FROM ALL DIRECTIONS TO THE OUTLET.. STEPS: 3/4 INCH PLAIN ROUND GALVANIZED STEEL STEPS (ALHAMBRA FDY. A-3320 OR EQUAL) ARE REQUIRED AS FOLLOWS: IF H IS 3.5 FEET OR LESS, NO STEPS ARE REQUIRED. IF H IS MORE THAN 3.5 FEET, AND NOT MORE THAN 5.0 FEET, INSTALL ONE STEP 16" ABOVE FLOOR a OF BASIN. cm IF H IS MORE THAN 5.0 FEET, INSTALL STEPS 12 INCHES APART, WITH THE TOP STEP 6" BELOW THE cf) TOP OF GRATING. ALL STEPS SHALL 4 INCHES CLEAR FROM THE WALL EXCEPT THE TOP STEP, WHICH SHALL BE z 2 1/2 INCHES (CLEAR) FROM THE WALL AND ANCHORED NOT LESS THAN 5 INCHES IN WALL OF 0 BASIN. f- co REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 4 , h s �• . . . . . . Of TA*Ay BINATION INLET CATCH BASIN SPECIFICATION 312 050 STANDARD 302 SHEET 2 OF 2 • • 114 1/4" R. �S \ 5/6" � � ��3►► CUT REINFORCING STEEL TO CLEAR FACE PLATE. J.. 660 21/2" _ 4 112" O10 .. = Z � 5/16"� 240 I OIZ = 1/411 511 D 2 1 1/8" HOLE IN PLATE WIQ r / QI� C.) ADJUSTING NUTS TO BE TIGHTENED AND I �'�� / `y SECURED IN PLACE WHEN STEEL PLATE ml� O N PROPER POSITION. GUTTER FLOW LINE I Q� � I 3 ANGLE IS I i CL R=1 MIN. . 3 i 1/2" 0 STIRRUP, WELD AS SHOWN - ,' 3 RR ... - •'Lij do 0 co 0 z 0 co 0 REVISIONS: APPROVED 1w 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 NOTES: D FACE PLATE 5/16" X 10" ROLLED PLATE (ASTM A36) FORMED AS SHOWN (ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY NO. A-3911 OR EQUIVALENT) & EXTEND LENGTH OF BOX. O FACEPLATE ANCHORAGE 1/2" 0 STEEL ANCHOR 42" O.C. (MAX.) PLACE AS SHOWN. D PROTECTION BAR: PLAIN ROUND STEEL BAR 1 DIA. SHALL BE INSTALLED WHEN NORMAL CURB HEIGHT IS GREATER THAN 6". BAR SHALL BE EMBEDDED 5" AT EACH END. • . - • • -- •, so ONG WITH O4 SUPPORT BAR 1 DIA: X 22 L T SQUARE HEAD AND HEX NUT, BEND AS SHOWN. SPACING SHALL NOT EXCEED 4 FEET. O5 ALL EXPOSED METAL PARTS SHALL BE GALVANIZED. 051 0--:2 2 STANDARD Ryo► 310 CURB SUPPORT DETAIL SHEET 1 OF 1 • 314" DIA PICK HOLE 2" X 1" DIAMOND MAT AGENCY 1/e" DEEP DESIGNATED INSCRIPTION. ALL LETTERS I HIGH. INSTALL LOCKING OEV ICE T/e" INSTALL LOCKING \ DEVICE . r x. r � ! �A A� - - L I 14 J PLAN 5/e" OUTSIDE DIA. OF COVER ��— DETAIL N � I I • DETAIL "Co ' •-� 22' DIA. CLEAR OPENING SECTION A -A FINISHED SL DRILL AND TAP HOLE AND INSTALL 3/� XI'/.' STAINLESS STEEL SOCKET SET SCREW WITH '3n- RECESSED HEX HOLE ALL THRE LOCKING DEVICE OUTLINE WHERE W RIB JOINS RIMOUTLINE WHERERIBS JOIN � � SAME ANGLE S18"J � 314" t-7 THROUGHOUT 318" DETAIL "C" w �-- f 3/1—Go IIWR 1' V Z J 3/4" 1/Z" v H • �: 1/16' R r 5/8 R" 22" DIA 2" =4 U CLEAR OPENING p4p r 1114" - ----- < N GAP IN RIM OF COVER OPPOSITE. PICK HOLE BOTTOM OF MANHOLE COVER �, r c ° o 0 0 .7 .n 4 G Z o DETAIL."B" a 052 3 a - - Q REVISIONS: APPROVED a • STANDARD 00/00/00 5 s Of CHRIS A. VOGT 311 CITY ENGINEER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE FRAME AND RCE 44250 COVER SHEET 1 OF 2 • 0 NOTES: 1. THE CAST IRON USED SHALL CONFORM WITH ASTM A-48 CLASS 3 OR BITUMINOUS PAINT AFTER 2. THE FRAME AND COVER SHALL BE COATED WITH ASPHALTUM TESTING AND INSPECTION. D DATE SHALL BE CAST ON THE BOTTOM OF THE COVER 3. FOUNDRY IDENTIFYING MARK, HEAT AN AND ON THE INSIDE OF THE FRAME. 4. IMPORTED COVERS AND FRAMES SHALL HAVE THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN MARKING IN COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS. F FRAME SHALL BE 30 POUNDS. WEIGHT OF COVER SHALL BE 85 POUNDS. ACTUAL 5_ WEIGHT O TO 110%• WEIGHTS. SHALL BE WITHIN A RANGE OF 95% 6. THE MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO SHIPMENT TO THE JOB SITE. ACCEPTANCE WILL BE INDICATED BY THE AGENCY'S M ARK. 28,600 POUNDS. 7. THE PROOF -LOAD FOR TEST METHOD B OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS N c+) O Z G N a 053 23 r , a a REVISIONS: APPROVED a • STANDARD 00/00/00 cu � s R'M Of 311 CHRIS A. VOGT OLE FRAME AND CITY ENGINEER CATCH BASIN MANH RCE 44250 1 (;OVER SHEET 2 OF 2 • co' 0 co 0 z 0 c • 2"X1" DIAMOND MAT, 1/8" DEEP ONE OF TWO LOCKING LUGS 7/8" PLAN TOP OF COVER 3/4" DIA. PICK HOLE SMOOTH 3/4" 3/4" MACHINE FINISH 3/16" 6 RIBS PICK HOLE PLAN LOCKING LUG BOTTOM OF COVER 1/ " Al 8" SMOOTH MACHINE 3/4„ FINISH PLAN PORTION OF FRAME —f-�_r23 5/8" DIA.��1/16" COVER cv) RIB LOCKING 1v N co co LUG � `y' 1/4" M FRAME nFTAIL "A" 24 3/4" DIA. (FRAME) �23 5/8" O.D. (COVER f 22" MIN. DIA. SEE CLEAR OPENING DETAIL SFCTION „A" FRAME AND COVER PARKWAY TOTAL WEIGHT - APPROX. 130 LBS. REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 ail .'10 DETAIL "A' ;• . . # 0, oc . ••'.:tf SEE DETAIL "A" PLAN TOP OF COVER 1.3/4" 1 /2" 6 RIBS SMOOTH MACHINE FINISH PLAN BOTTOM OF COVER SMOOTH MACHINE FINISH 3/4" 12 RIBS PLAN PORTION OF FRAME 26 1/2" DIA. . 24" DIA. �22" DIA.---� R3CN 3 1/2" �-----23 3/4" DIA. co 30 3/4" DIA. SECTION FRAME N "v 24"DIA. 3/4. ti r-3/4" i 3/4" o-1 I-- 23 1/2" DIA. 1/4" SECTION COVER ROADWAY TOTAL WEIGHT - APPROX. 380 LBS. 054 . & 4(v 0 �\c&tl 4 QdArA C 4 MANHOLE FRAMES AND COVERS STANDARD 312 SHEET 1 OF 1 • JT z_ 2 BLOCK U) X� cf C 3116" in 15/—►1 W 8" 5/8" OR 3/4" DIA. HOLES BAR SPACER BOLTED END BLOCK BAR 1/2" OR 5/8" 1 518'. —►j jrl W BOLTS CUT WASHERS. - SPOT WELD SPACER �X � OR PEEN 5t8" OR 3/4' BOLTING DETAIL ALTERNATIVE SPACER 31/2"X 112" BAR —' ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE SECTION A -A WELDED GRATE BOLTED GRATE GRATE DETAILS (SEE TABLE BELOW) TYPE NO. BARS „ W . " X " 24 - 9 9 2" 1 9/18" USE IN LOCATIONS OFF THE ROADBEI USE WITHIN THE ROADBED ON HIGHV' 24 -12 12 1 3/8" 1 1/4" OR FOR RURAL CONDITIONS. USE WITHIN THE ROADBED UNDER UI L24-18 18 3/4" 15/16" PERMITTED. 'S' i� N AF W a D W OMIT ANCHOR 2'- 1 1/2" IF W" BEAM SUPPORT IS =v USED 4" --- 2" 3116" 1/2" ANCHORS FRAME DETAILS REVISIONS: it APPROVED OO/Oo/Oo CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 USAGE ON ALL TYPES OF HIGHWAYS AYS' WHERE BICYCLES AND PEDESTRIANS ARE EXCLUDED, ,BAN CONDITIONS WHERE BICYCLES AND PEDESTRIANS ARE WEIGHTS TYPE WELDED BOLTED 24 -9 2D0 230 24 -12 [24' 258 286 24 -18 372 400 FRAME 90 �" GENERAL NOTES: O1 GRATE TYPE NUMBERS REFER TO WIDTH OF GRATE IN INCHES AND NUMBER OF BARS RESPECTIVELY. O2 CONTRACTOR HAS THE OPTION OF USING WELDED OR BOLTED GRATES. U3 GRATES AND FRAMES TO BE PAINTED. O4 ROUNDED TOP OF BARS OPTIONAL ON ALL GRATES. O5 GRATE SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT BARS ARE PARALLEL TO DIRECTION OF PRINCIPAL SURFACE FLOW. 055 STANDARD cu �r Of 4 315 GRATE AND FRAME DETAIL SHEET 1 OF 1 • • m w 2 1/2" X 1 1/2" X 1/4" GALVANIZED STEEL ANGLE NO.C3 CE(BAR 3ff NO. CREBA z NO. 5 DEFORMED BAR J�U 3" LEG N0.3 DEFORMED BAR T 11/2 AT90° 90°T 6f1VARIES f';: 6ff 4 1/2"f -*4"*' 1/211 1011 0" 811 ANCHOR DETAIL DOWEL DETAIL W SECTION X-X 2" CLR (TYP) 211 R/W OR EDGE OF WALK 211 TRANSITION -rLL -- SEE NOTE NO. 8 ' (SHEET 2) }---- - -T-- -' 611 LAID RADIALLY NO. 3 REBAR I Y , X Lf 1 INLET PIPE i t MAY JOIN •',c� I STRUCTURE _ t _ AT ANY ` rr. ANGLE. DOWEL IS TO BE USED x , , 1 DIRECTION POURED x� %. , %` ,�`, , " -- WHEN TOP IS PO ��% , , t I Cl SHALL BE SEPARATELY. ONE AT W�, „'�., 'x, ,-- I INDICATED EACH CORNER. le �`�` }j,�� I ON PLAN. ` ,y SCORE LINE - �� -" ----•1 , I ` CURB D ' .z w uj CURB E Y�� - Z DOWEL --*—LENGTH OF CURB TRANSITION TRANS. ANCHOR J TO BE SPECIFIED ON PLAN TOP VIEW CONC. TRANS. NO.3 REBAR 22" DIA. CLEAR OPENING FRAME 6„ 12" C-C (MAX) AND COVER, ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY SEE PAGE 2 OF 2 FOR A1535 OR APPROVED EQUAL. CURB TRANSITION NO.3 REBAR m PROFILE 3" 6" C-C (MAX) 2% ci �CL w z 8" 4" 2% MIN. �..61 :. N ARALLEL WITH INVERT c P SECTION Y-Y 056 REVISIONS: APPROVED STANDARD 00/00/004 s f Of _320 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 CURB OUTLET SHEET 1 OF 2 1. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS "A" WHEN STRUCTURE IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF A PROPOSED SIDEWALK OR IS CONTIGUIOS TO SUCH SIDEWALK, THE TOP 01 OF THE STRUCTURE SHALL BE POURED MONOLITHIC WITH THE SIDEWALK, USING THE SAME CLASS OF CONCRETE AS IN THE SIDEWALK. 2. DIMENSIONS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN: A-B=5' C,-D,=3' E-F=5' W = 3' 3. FLOOR OF STRUCTURE SHALL BE GIVEN A STEEL -TROWELED FINISH AND CONSTRUCTED ON A STRAIGHT GRADE FROM BACK OF STRUCTURE TO GUTTER FLOW -LINE AT POINT A. THE V-SECTION SPECIFIED FOR INVERT SHALL EXTEND FROM PIPE OUTLET TO A POINT 3' FROM THE GUTTER, FROM WHICH POINT THE INVERT SHALL BE WARPED TO JOIN THE GUTTER FLOW -LINE AT THE STRUCTURE. 4. REINFORCING STEEL BARS SHALL BE 1" FROM BOTTOM OF THE SLAB. 5. SURFACE OF ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO EXISTING OR PROPOSED CURB AND WALK ADJACENT TO THE STRUCTURE. 6. CORRUGATED METAL FORMS SHALL NOT BE USED FOR SUPPORTING THE TOP SLAB. 7. TOP OF STRUCTURE SHALL SLOPE 2% TOWARD CURB EXCEPT WHEN OTHERWISE SHOWN ON PLAN OR TO FIT EXISTING SIDEWALK. B. TRANSITION FROM PIPE TO STRUCTURE, IF REQUIRED, TO BE IN BACK OF SIDEWALK. DIMENSIONS OF TRANSITION SHALL BE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN. co o � , 0 co v � 10' TRANSIT 0 10, TRANSITION cv _ - ION co L-T `° 0 z-------------- I I NORMAL CURB LINE 0 w PROFILE PROTECTION BAR 057 U• Q REVISIONS: APPROVED STANDARD 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT 320 CITY ENGINEER CURB OUTLET . RCE 44250 SHEET 2 OF 2 6' VARIES RNV 4" WYE AS REQUIRED SIDEWALK INSTALL F.L. OF PIPE 1/2" 6" REMOVABLE ABOVE GUTTER PLUG FLOW LINE I INVERT ELEV. r.�. A 4" P.V.C. PER PLAN i 2% LL INV. ELEV. PER PLAN CURB &GUTTER 3"X4" REDUCER 4"X4"X4" TEE 3" MIN. P.V.C. (SCHEDULE 40) 3" MIN. RECTANGULAR CAST IRON PIPE 4" MIN. ROUND CAST IRON PIPE ELEVATION INSTALL POLYETHYLENE PLASTIC JOINTMATERIAL "QUICK JOINT' OR EQUAL. 1 1/2" MIN. COVER • _ a a a v a v a v, a v• a• "st v a v a v :v •a •.v 9„ 6„ _ z SECTION A -A 0 o z c c REVISIONS: APPROV 00/00/00 'fy CHRIS A. VOGT of 46 CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 PRIVATE DRAIN THROUGH CURB 380 058 STANDARD 321 SHEET 1 OF 1 11 • • INLET PER CASE 1.11. OR III R/W LINE N-4"C.I. PIPES (SEE NOTE 51 1112" MIN. CLEARANCE WALK ISEE NOTE 4) RI of PLAN .o SEE NOTE 10 TOP OF CURB LINE /--- E. G. R/W PIPE PER. IMPROVEMENT OR GRADING PLAN MAX. SLOPE 1: 1 I HINGE COVER AT TOP OF FRAME RECTANGULAR FRAME AND COVER P E R C.LQ STD. No. 323. 1 SEE NOTE I 3" MIN. 1 I • 6" TYPICAL CASE I INLET TRANSITION STRUCTURE SECTION R/W FRAME 8 GRATE. SEE NOTE 9 1" MIN. * h�-� • 6" TYPICAL I..— 2' - 0" MIN.---4 CASE II INLET DROP INLET CATCH BASIN SECTION R/W r-0" 1 SEE NOTE 2 8PEGRAIDING PLAN MPROVEMENT WALK .At - J CASE III INLET GRADED DITCH SECTION 18" 18" T.C. LINE EXPANSION NO. 3 BARJ JOINT 8" 8" EXPANSION JOINT F.L. 2112" MIN. FOR 6" AND 7" CURB FACES. 31/2" MIN. FOR 8" CURB FACE. FR/W PARKWAY WIDTH PER IMPROVEMENT PLAN ` 1/2" CLEAR 4" C.I. PIPES T.C. LINE 7--C.F. OR 8" C.F.gX6-10/10 FINISHED PARKWAY GRAOE P.C.C. WALK (8"C.F.)-SEE NOTE 4 P.C.C. WALK ( 6" C.F. 1-SEE NOTE 4 GALV. WIRE FABRIC-] 7 Z I NOTE: APPLIES TO ANY NUMBER OF CURB PROFILE 8" CURB FACE PIPES \ NO. 3 BA 112" 0 o .. P.C.C. CURB 8 GUTTER C SEE NOTE 8 Z GUTTER TO MATCH EXISTING C H N a SECTION 3 O. Q REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 " 8" T.C. LINE SEE INLET DETAILS No. # JOINT SION �3�AR 4" C.1., PIPE EXPANSION JOINT 1� ao`I 112" CLEAR 4" C.I. PIPES NOTE: APPLIES TO ANY NUMBER OF PIPES A _ nH NORMAL T.C. GRADE LINE AS SHOWN ON PROFILE CURB PROFILE 059 6" CURB FACE 381. a U&rcu a � 2 CURB DRAM STANDARD 322 SHEET 1 OF 2 • NOTES 1, IF THE TOE OF SLOPE IS ALLOWED WITHIN THE R/W. INLET CASE I BEGINS AT THE TOE RATHER THAN THE R/W LINE. 2. FOR OPEN DITCH (CASE INLET III)' THE EXTENSION ND OFWALK ISE2'OOR MORE THE R/W LINE IS NOT REQUIRED WHEN BACK PIPE SHALL EXTEND TO R/W LINE. FROM THE R/W LINE: HOWEVER, 3. TOP OF INLET STRUCTURE (CASE I AND 11) TO BE FLUSH WITH ADJACENT SURFACE WHERE PRACTICABLE 4. CONSTRUCT P.C.C. WALK WHEN SPECIFIED ON PLAN. CONSTRUCTED CONTRACTPRICE C PAID FOR P.C.C. WALK ITEM SHALL INCLUDE WALK CONJUNCTION WITH PARKWAY CULVERT. 5. "N" EQUALS NUMBER OF PIPES (MAXIMUM OF THREE) AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN. 6. INLET CASE TO BE SPECIFIED ON IMPROVEMENT OR GRADING PLAN. 7. ANGLE "A" EQUALS 0° , UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 8. TYPE, DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF P.C.C. CURB AND GUTTER PER IMPROVEMENT PLAN. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, FRAME AND GRATE FOR CASE II INLET 9. — LONG BEACH SHALL BE ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY 14"X14" INC. X-3II6 (GALVANIZED) EQUALLVANIZED). IRON WORKS, 10. AT LOCATIONS O-F LESS 1HAN 8 INCH CURB FACT 6X6-10/10ND BEYOND GALVANIZED WIRE FABRIC. WIRE FABRIC TO EXTEND 8 INCHES THE EDGE OF CAST IRON PIPES. T 0 Lo T 0 Z co Q Q REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 STANDARD 4 s Mot 322 CURB DRAT N 382 SHEET 2 OF 2 0 0 N z 112" :E ------------------------ ---------------------- ...... ------------ to 118"x 114"x 1" PAD IN EACH CORNER 3/8' RIB IN EACH CORNER___j PLAN FRAME YS-16 NC-2 REVISIONS: SECTION A - SECTION E-E 2 318" fT SECTION LECTION C-C 1 318- Ya" CORE, 4 HOLES SECTION D-D SECTION F-F APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 RECTANGULAR FRAME AND COVER I 061 3 STANDARD 323 SHEET 1 OF 2 • NOTES I. FRAME AND COVER SHALL BE CAST IRON. 2. A PLAIN 1/4" BORDER SHALL BE TYPICAL FOR ALL BORDERS ON FRAME AND COVER. 3. ALL CASTING RADII SHALL BE 1/4" UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 4. WEIGH T OF FRAME AND COVER IS 43 POUNDS. 5. USE ONE 3/8"-16x1" STAINLESS STEEL TOS�HREADED ORTION PAPPLY RIOR HIGH ADHESIVE. OPEN GEAR GREASE TO INSERTION. 6. USE 4"x4" CAST ALUMINUM LINK HINGE WITH SST PIN FOR 1800 OPENING. 0 N O Z C Q 3 a Q REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 h S �vr fy Of RECTANGULAR FRAME AND COVER 062 38d - — .STANDARD 3123 SHEET 2 OF 2 VARIABLE VARIABLE NORMAL C.F. NORMAL C.F. 3' 8' T + 4" i T T + 4" T T TAPERED NORMAL TAPERED T SIDE OPENING SIDE OPENING C.F. NORMAL C.F. C.F. 12" SIDE OPENING BASIN I BASIN BASIN C.F. TOP OF CURB H SLOPE BREAK LINE > J''" STRAIGHT GRADE STRAIGHT GRADE 1/2" EXPANSION SEE NOTE 1• (TYFP.) JOINT MATERIAL ` P-H 2 (TYP•) CASE A B' 3' NORMAL TAPERED T W T TAPERED C.F. SIDE OPENING C F NORMAL C.F. BASIN C.F. O STR. GR.-------- 51 K. -K. I 4'-0" WARPED D 9 GUTTER 1/2" EXPANSION SEE NOTE 1'-0" m,P.) JOINT MATERIAL 2 (TYP,) CASE B (CONTINUOUS GRADE) T W T NORMAL IT TAPERED NORMAL C.F. TAPERED C.F. C.F. SIDE OPENING C.F. BASIN FLO LOW STR. GR. r _ STR. GR. > 14 4' GUTTERED VA( D 1/2" EXPANSION SEE NOTE 1'-T (TYP.) JOINT MATERIAL 2 (TYP ) CASE C (SAG) r NOTES: 1. GUTTER DEPRESSION SHALL BE CASE B UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON PROJECT DRAWINGS. 4. WHERE NO CURB EXIST, CURBS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED SECTION DEPRESSION. CURBETWEEN SHALL CONFORM O Z 2. ELEVATIONS OF OUTER CORNERS SHOWN ON TO THAT OF CONTROLLING AGENCY. PROJECT. IF NO ELEVATIONS ARE SPECIFIED, THE OUTER EDGE OF GUTTER DEPRESSION SHALL 5. DEPRESSION SHALL BE CLASS "B" CONCRETE. N CONFORM TO FINISHED STREET SURFACE. s CATCH BASIN OPENING =NORMAL CURB HEIGHT C 3. A= 4 FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. +4 INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. T= SEE STANDARD DRAWING 300 (2 of 2) DIMENSIONS. W= 4 FEET MIN., UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. C� fz REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 TOP OF TTCUR*-: TTER FLOW LINE ND OFF GUERDEPRESSIONA SECTION H-H 063 w � a � s y Of GUTTER DEPRESSION FOR CURB oPFNI NG CATCH BASIN STANDARD 330 SHEET 1 OF 1 NORMAL 8' T �*--V11 T 3• C.F. D NORMAL III I T7LOW` STIR. GR. > SEE .� NOTE Q 1--8" (TYP.) OPENING I STR. R. I F—FOR � I GRATING i y�, D SLOPE B K LINE `C��' D"w SEE NOTE 1/2" EXPANSION 2 (TYP.) JOINT MATERIAL CASE A CATCH BASIN OPENING = NORMAL CURB FACE t 4 INCHES UNLESS NORMAL 8T �--w T OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. C.F. D NORMAL Fii —-- ----� C.F. I ., FLUVV IS(TR. GR. D SEEJ NOTE #2STRAIGHT GRpuE TYP.) OPENING 9 FOR — i GRATING ti SLOPE BREAK LINE DO _ 1/2" EXPANSION _ JOINT MATERIAL CASE B N > } SEE NOTE 2 (TYP..) NORMAL 3' T W T W T W T 30 NORMAL C.F. C.F. FI�---------------� OW STIR. G45' PENINGI R• uR —r�vvv FOR V'9� I RATINGS �Fj• D SEE NOTE #2 ST�STRAIGHT GCE PE BR K LINE D� SEE NOTE 1'�" (TYP.)XPANSION 2 (nP•) JOINT MATERIAL CAS E C NOTES: T_ 1. GUTTER DEPRESSION SHALL BE: C7 (A) CASE "A" SEE STD. NO. 302 COMBINATION 3. A = 4' UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. CATCH BASIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPEC- T = SEE STD. DRAWING NO. 302 (Z of 2) DIMENSIONS O IFIED. W = SEE STD. DRAWING 302 (2 of 2) DIMENSIONS. Z (B) CASE "B" SEE STD. NO. 301 COMBINATION INLET CATCH BASIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE 4. WHERE NO CURB EXISTS, CURB SHALL BE CON - SPECIFIED. STRUCTED BETWEEN ENDS OF GUTTER DEPRES- SION. CURB SECTION SHALL CONFORM TO THAT 2. ELEVATIONS AT OUTER CORNERS SHOWN ON OF CONTROLLING AGENCY. THE PROJECT DRAWINGS. IF NO ELEVATIONS ARE SPECIFIED, THE OUTER EDGE OF THE GUT- DEPRESSION SHALL BE CLASS B CONCRETE. F- TER DEPRESSION SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIN- TER ISHED STREET SURFACE. Q REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 a �► °` • CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RICE 44250 �1 a` fy 01 A VAR VAR. FLOW LINE 12" PAVEMENT MIN. SHLDR SLOPE fi" 1' DEPRESSION (MAX IN SHOULDER) uiKlFu GUTTER DEPRESSION FOR GRA T E OPENING CATCH BASIN SECTION D-D 064 STANDARD 331 SHEET 1 OF 1 �J D 3 a Q • D, F OPTIONAL OUTSIDE EDGES TO BE EDGE OF CONCRETE ROUNDED i TO 3" R D BARS B, a 3" OC _ �- #3 TIE BAR R'P R= 10 OF SPUR C t tC 446. E BARS At _1 J 3'-3' LONG. I L J 4-#4 H BARS SEE NOTE 2 —#3 TIE BAR 3'-0' LONG D BARS _ 3" OC. �- SEE NOTE 9 gl a DETAIL "N" 344 J BARS 4'-8' (RINGS AND COVER NOT SHOWN) LONG 3' OC CON' T. F---� r ' I-. F- ADD-L. BARS 6' OC (SEE NOTE I) TO INSIDE EDGE OF PLAN MANHOLE. SEE NOTE 2 (SHAFT NOT SHOWN) STREET GRADE -- MANHOLE SHAFT PER STD. PLAN 324 MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER PER STEPS �-( TIE BAR 5 ROUND F F EDGES TO 3'R #4®18' OC BOTH WAYS. TO BE USED w WHEN D2 IS 60' OR OVER SECTION A -A w .J co w w U) ---'L J BARS SPRING LINE INLET ELEVATION APPLIES AT THIS POINT TABLE OF VALUES FOR F D2 I F F 36` 6 1/2' II 3/4" 39' 7' E178 12 I/2' 42' 7 1/2' 13 1/4" 45' 7 3/4" 96" 1 14" 48" 8` 102' 15 1/2' 51' 8 I/2' 108" 16' 54' 9' 114" 16 1/2" 57' 9 1/4' 120' 1 17' 60" 9 I/2' 126' 17' 63" ' 10" 132'_�1.7 1/2 _ 138'1 17 1/2' 66' 10 1/4' 69" 10 3/4' 1 144' j 18' 72• IF REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 z o PIPE SEAT LEVEL. al SEE NOTE 8 E BARS w 3'� 1133 RJ3 D BbRS I p P 2' - 4'' 2' -4 - t" LA- GRADE POINTS. SEE NOTE 4 SECTION B-B CONCRETE RINGS PER ST PLAN 3 OMIT Ti STEP It PAVED STREET H BARS 16" FOR P STREETS. FOR UNPA STREETS cToccT GRADE ZING SEAT H BARS SEE TABLE VARIABLE E BARS SECTION C-C #3 OR 04 TIE BARS J BARS ROUND EDGES TO 3'R TABLE Or VALUES FOR M (SEE NOTE 1) SECTION PAVED STREET UNPAVED STREET MAX. MIN. MAX. MIN. 7-10112" T6" 11" 8112" 16" 15" z4 cu Of MANHOLE PIPE TO PIPE (MAIN LINE ID=36" OR LARGER 0651 STANDARD 87340 SHEET 1 OF 3 NOTES I. WHEN DEPTH M FROM STREET GRADE TO THE TOP OF THE BOX IS LESS THAN 2'-10 I/2" FOR PAVED STREETS OR 3'-6" FOR UNPAVED STREETS. CONSTRUCT MONOLITHIC SHAFT PER SECTION C-C AND DETAIL 'N". SHAFT FOR ANY DEPTH OF MANHOLE MAY BE CONSTRUCTED PER SECTION C-C. WHEN DIAMETER Di IS 48" OR LESS, CENTER OF SHAFT MAY BE LOCATED PER NOTE 2. 2. CENTER OF MANHOLE SHAFT SHALL BE LOCATED OVER CENTER LINE OF STORM DRAIN WHEN DIAMETER Di IS 48" OR LESS, IN WHICH CASE PLACE E BARS SYMMETRICALLY AROUND SHAFT AT 450 WITH CENTER LINE AND. OMIT J BARS. 3. L AND P SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING VALUES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PROJECT DRAWINGS: A. D2= 96" OR LESS, L= 5' -6', P= 5" B. D2 OVER 96". L= 6' -O', P= 8" L MAY BE INCREASED OR LOCATION OF MANHOLE SHIFTED TO MEET PIPE ENDS. WHEN. L GREATER THAN THAT SHOWN ABOVE IS SPECIFIED, D BARS SHALL BE CONTINUED 6"OC. 4. STATIONS OF MANHOLES SHOWN ON PROJECT DRAWINGS APPLY AT CENTER LINE OF SHAFT. ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN AT CENTER LINE OF SHAFT AND REFER TO THE PROLONGED INVERT GRADE LINES. 5. REINFORCEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615, GRADE 40. AND SHALL TERMINATE 1 1/2" CLEAR OF CONCRETE SURFACES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 6. FLOOR OF MANHOLE SHALL BE STEEL TROWELED TO SPRING LINE. 7. BODY OF MANHOLE SHALL BE POURED IN ONE CONTINUOUS OPERATION EXCEPT THAT A CONSTRUCTION JOINT WITH A LONGITUDINAL KEYWAY MAY BE PLACED AT SPRING LINE. 8. THICKNESS OF THE DECK SHALL VARY WHEN NECESSARY TO .PROVIDE A LEVEL SEAT BUT SHALL NOT, BE LESS THAN THE TABULAR VALUES FOR F SHOWN ON TABLE SH. I. 9. D BARS SHALL BE o4 FOR D2= 39" OR LESS. N5 FOR D2= 42" TO 84" INCLUSIVE AND N6 FOR D2=90' OR OVER. 10. CENTER LINE OF INLET PIPE SHALL INTERSECT INSIDE FACE OF CONE AT o SPRING LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. cm 0 II. STEPS SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD PLAN 635 OR 635 UNLESS OTHERWISE c SHOWN, STEPS SHALL BE UNIFORMLY SPACED 14" TO 15" OC. THE LOWEST c STEP SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN 24' ABOVE THE INVERT. z • 12. THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA SHALL BE USED FOR THIS MANHOLE co RCP MAIN LINE = 36" INSIDE DIAMETER OR LARGER. EXCEPT IF MAIN LINE RCP DOWNSTREAM OR MANHOLE IS 36" TO 42" INSIDE DIAMETER AND Q MAIN LINE RCP UPSTREAM IS 33" OR LESS STANDARD PLAN 321 SHALL 066 3 BE USED. a Q REVISIONS: APPROVED S ARD 00/00/00 ^ s CHRIS A. VOGT . -'o�� V 340 CITY ENGINEER MANHOLE PIPET PIPE (MAIN RCE 4425 LINE I D=36 " OR LARGER) SHEET 2 OF 3 • • Q 3 a Q B. THE OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF THE LATERAL MUST BE LESS THAN OR . EOUAL TO 1/2 THE INSIDE DIAMETER OF THE MAIN LINE. IF THE UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM DIAMETERS OF THE MANHOLE ARE NOT - THE SAME, THE GOVERNING INSIDE DIAMETER OF THE MAIN LINE SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE THAT WHERE THE EXTENDED CENTER LINE OF THE LATERAL ENTERS THE MANHOLE. C. IN NO INSTANCE SHALL THE INSIDE DIAMETER OF THE LATERAL TO THE MANHOLE BE GREATER THAN 30". 13. MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD PLAN 630- UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 14. MANHOLE SHAFT SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD PLAN 324 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 15. WHERE A MANHOLE SHAFT - 36-INCH WITHOUT REDUCER IS SPECIFIED REFER TO STANDARD PLAN 326. 16. WHERE A PRESSURE MANHOLE SHAFT - WITH ECCENTRIC REDUCER IS SPECIFIED REFER TO STANDARD PLAN 328. 17. WHERE A PRESSURE MANHOLE SHAFT - 36-INCH WITHOUT REDUCER IS SPECIFIED REFER TO STANDARD PLAN 329. THE FOLLOWING A.P.W.A. STANDARD PLANS ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE: 324 326 328 329 630 633 635 636 REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 MANHOLE SHAFT - WITH ECCENTRIC REDUCER MANHOLE SHAFT - 36-INCH WITHOUT REDUCER PRESSURE MANHOLE SHAFT - WITH ECCENTRIC PRESSURE MANHOLE SHAFT 36-INCH WITHOUT_ REDUCER 24-INCH MANHOLE FRAME AND. COVER 36-INCH MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER STEEL STEP POLYPROPYLENE PLASTIC STEP CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 067 383 a STANDARD 4 s j 340 �y OF MANHOLE PIPE TO PIPE (MAIN LINE ID=36" OR LARGER SHEET 3 OF 3. • `J B EDGES TO BE ROUNDED TO3"R At 1 ,%tA J y' R = I D OF SPUR ± Z(_ ALL STEEL #4 0 4' OC B PLAN • (SHAFT NOT SHOWN) +C i DETAIL "N" PLAN (RINGS AND COVER NOT SHOWN) SEE NOTE I STREET GRADE MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER PER CONCRETE RINGS STD. PLAN 630 PER STD. PLAN 324 W 24' OMIT THIS STEP J IN PAVED STREETS aC= MANHOLE 24' ~ SHAFT 16' FOR PAVED PER STD. 9' 5' w STREETS. 2'-2" cn PLAN 324 FOR UNPAVED '`� T 3'-6' 3'-0" STREETS ._: T. ao 5'z2' PIPE SEAT =3- T ROUND EDGES I/2' T 3�-6. OF INLETS ROUND EDGES STREET GRADE 5'zl" RING SEAT co W J (n Q . t- co N T w W J F— m0 az cr W Q W > N in _ 1:_� L1/2' INLET ELEVATION SECTION C—C APPLIES AT THIS POINT SECTION A —A STATION LINE 3' -0' °o STEPS T I 18' T 3"R N III\ I cm 4• ~ L+2T-8' 4' ao O i z cp G N OPTIONAL BOTTOM GRADE POINTS. SEE NOTE 5 a SECTION B-B 3 a Q REVISIONS: TABLE OF VALUES FOR M (SEE NOTE 1) PAVED STREET UNPAVED STREET SECTION MAX MIN. MAX. MIN. A -A 2' -10 1/2' 3'-6" C-C IF 8 1/2' 16' 15' APPROVED 000/00/00 scu �'� CHRIS A. VOGT OF CITY ENGINEER NHOLE PIPE TO PIPS(ONE RCE 44250 ['UBOTH MAIN LINE I D ' S 33 " OR 390. 068 STANDARD 341 SHEET 1 OF 3 0 E 0 N co O Z O N a Q • NOTES I. WHEN DEPTH M FROM STREET GRADE TO THE TOP OF THE BOX IS LESS THAN 2' -10 I/2" FOR PAVED STREETS OR 3' -6" FOR UNPAVED DEPTH M MAY 8E CONSTRUCT SHAFT PER CION C-C OF 6'NDWHDEN TAIL "N LARGER VALUES OF M REDUCED TO AN ABSOLUTE LIMIT WOULD REDUCE H IN SECTION C-C TO 3'-6" OR LESS. 2. H (IN SECTION A -A AND B-B) SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 4'-0", BUT MAY BE INCREASED PROVIDED THAT THE VALUE OF REDUCER M SHALL NOT B BEEUSED. SS THAN .THE MINIMUM SPECIFIED AND THAT FOR H (IN SECTION C-C) SEE NOTE I. 3. L SHALL BE 4' -0" UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. L SAYBBT NCR CHANGE PIPE LOCATION OF MANHOLE SHIFTED TO MD IN LOCATION OF THE SPUR MUST BE APPROVED BYTHE ENGINEER. 4. T SHALL BE 8" FOR VALUES OF H UP TO AND INCLUDING 8'-0" AND 10" FOR VALUES OF H OVER 8' -0". 5. STATIONS OF MANHOLES SHOWN ON PROJECT DRA AT CENTER LINE OF INGS APPLY AT CENTER LINE OF SHAFT. ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN SHAFT AND REFER TO THE PROLONGED INVERT GRADE LINES. SEE NOTE 3. 6. REINFORCEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615. GRADE 40. AND SHALL TERMINATE 1 1/2 CLEAR OF CONCRETE SURFACES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 7. FLOOR OF MANHOLE SHALL BE STEEL TROWELED TO SPRING LINE. 8. BODY OF MANHOLE SHALL BE POURED IN ONECONTINT OUS OPERATION PERATI N EXCEPT THAT A CONSTRUCTION JOINT WITH A L KEYWAY MAY BE PLACED AT SPRING LINE. 9. THICKNESS OF THE DECK SHALL VARY WHEN NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A LEVEL SEAT BUT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 8 . 10. STEPS SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD PLAN 635, OR 636.UNLESS LOTHERWISE SHOWN. STEPS SHALL BE UNIFORMLY ABOVESPACEDTHE LEDGE AT THE SIDE OF WEST STEP SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN 2.4 THE MANHOLE. -" REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 �` $ s I•y 4 Of CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER MANHOLE PIPE TO PIPE RCE 44250 1 BOTH MAIN LINE I D ' S Q�rw (ONE OR 33 " OR 39t oss STANDARD 341 SHEET 2 OF 3 G, 4b II. THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA SHALL BE USED FOR THIS MANHOLE: A. MAIN LINE = 33" INSIDE DIAMETER HORMANHOLE(EXCEPTION TO 42� INSIDE THE MAIN LINE RCP DOWNSTREAM OF DIAMETER AND THE MAIN LINE SCNOTPSTREAM IS APPL CABLE3WHEORELTHE MAIN C.L.Q. STD. No. 340 OR C.L.Q. STD. No. 342 I LINE CONDUIT IS LESS THAN 36" IN DIAMETER. B. SEE SECTION A - A. THE MAXIMUM LATERAL" THE DISTANCE FROM BE CONNECTED TO THIS MANHOLE IS . SUCH THAT THE OUTSIDE (TOP) OF THE LATERALT TO THE OTTOM OF VERTICALLYEFROM THICK TOP OF THE MANHOLE CHAMBER THE END OF THE RCP, SHALL BE A MINMUM OF 6". C. IF THE SIZE OF THE LATERAL IS ANTAINEDT THATHE THEN ONEEOFPTHEFIED MINIMUM DISTANCES CANNOT BE MI FOLLOWING ALTERNATE SOLUTIONS MUST BE USED. I. PROVIDE A SPECIAL STRUCTURE. 2. PROVIDE Two STANDARD S RORTU - RES. CONSISTING DOwNSTREAM FROMOTHEHIS APPLICABLE MANHOLE PLACED UPSTREAM JUNCTION STRUCTURE OR TRANSITION STRUCTURE. 12. MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD PLAN 630 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 13. MANHOLE SHAFT SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD PLAN 324 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 14. WHERE A MANHOLE SHAFT'- 36-INCH WITHOUT REDUCER IS SPECIFIED REFER TO STANDARD PLAN 336. 15. WHERE A PRESSURE MANHOLE SHAFT - WITH ECCENTRIC REDUCER IS SPECIFIED REFER TO STANDARD PLAN 328. 16. WHERE A PRESSURE MANHOLE SHAFT - 36-INCH WITHOUT REDUCER IS SPECIFIED REFER TO STANDARD: PLAN 329. THE FOLLOWING A.P.W.A. STANDARD PLANS ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE: 324 326 a 328 "O 329 c. 630 z 633 c 63 5 co 63 6 Q 3 a Q REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 MANHOLE SHAFT - WITH ECCENTRIC REDUCER MANHOLE SHAFT - 36-INCH WITHOUT REDUCER PRESSURE MANHOLE SHAFT - WITH ECCENTRIC PRESSURE MANHOLE SHAFT - 36-INCH WITHOUT REDUCER 24-INCH MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER 36-INCH MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER STEEL STEP POLYPROPLYLENE PLASTIC STEP • s4 X4� LI FF RM Of BOTH MAIN LINE ID' S 33" OR 070 STANDARD 3-41 SHEET 3 OF 3 3-#4 J BARS, 44 ROUND TO 3' R 4'-8' LONG. OPTIONAL FILLET 310C CONTINUE F °I F ADDITIONAL BARS T 6-OC TO INSIDE 6 EDGE OF MANHOLE T STATION R� (L SPUR ANY STANDARD 5•x2' PIPE SEAT I PIPE JOINT 3-D BARS, 3-OC CONTINUE 6'OC f P 4-86 E BARS. C-) SEE NOTE 3 �m mP�v. #3 OR #4 ' a'�� ` 0 18' OC R = I D TIE BARS OF SPUR s A 8 B BARS f , �fM WITH A MAX. OF 3' -6' STATION PT. — — TATI N F D F PLAN (SHAFT NOT SHOWN) STREET GRADE MANHOLE MANHOLE FRAME' SHAFT 7 AND COVER PER PER STD. w STD. PLAN 630 PLAN 324 m ' \ D BARS w TIE BARS STEPS 0 F BARS TIE BARS N w I 5"x2- PIPE ( SEAT I A BARS 5' F I F ELEV. R 00 ELEV. S 5, B BARS #4018' OC BOTH IL WAYS. TO BE 4' -ON OPTIONAL' OUTSIDE EDGE OF (— CONCRETE C` t c 4 -#4 H BARS Y -0" LONG DETAIL "N's (RINGS AND COVER NOT SHOWN) SEE NOTE 2 OMIT THIS CONCRETE RINGS PER STD. STREET GRADE STEP IN PAVED PLAN 324 J 5' x V RING SEAT STREETS W m r H BAR H BAR 16" FOR PAVED Z� m STREETS. 2'-2' FOR UNPAVED STREETS . '- 6 VARIABLE " — TIE BARS E BARS 6' TIE BARS F F J BARS F BARS- ROUND TIE EDGES BARS- T TO 3'R T SECTION C-C I- SECTION G-G IL SHAFT I 5•x2• PIPE SEAT I w D BARS D BARS , ROUND IIP EDGES TO 3' R e I 2.-4 STATION LL J ELEVATION II STATION ELEVATION LONGITUDINAL SECTION #4018' OC BOTH WAYS. USED WHEN B TO BE USED WHEN D2 1S 60' OR MORE IS 60. OR MORE TABLE OF VALUES FOR 7 SECTION N-M-P-O 8 T B T 12' 4 - 6 3' 10' IS' 4 1/4" 66' 10 1/4' TABLE OF BARS SIZES TABLE OF VALUES FOR F 18' 4 I/2" 62' IO 3/4' N 02OR B A 8 B D OR F o F ° F 21' S• 72' It' N _ 36' 6 1/2• 78' II 3/4' 24" 5 I/4' 78' II 3/4' 12'-39" #503" #40b" 39_ 7• 84• 12 1/2' 27• 5 1/2' 84- 12 1/2' 42'-84" 603' # 506" 42• 7 1/2• 9o- 13 1/4" 30' 6' 90' 13 I/4• 33' 6 1/4• 96' 14" Z 90'-144' #703" #606' 45' 7 3/4• 96" 14' 36' 1 1/2' 102" 15 1/2' _ 48- g• 102' 15. 1/2' 39- 7' 108' 16' 8 I/2' 108• 16" -5q• — 9• 114- 16 1/2' 42- 7 1/2' 114' 16 1/2' 45' 7 3/4' 120" 17' N TABLE OF VALUES FOR M (SEE NOTE 2) -5?• 9 1 126" 17" 48- 8. 126- 17- PAVED STREET UNPAVED STREET 60' 9 o_ 126' 17' • 63• 10' 132" 17 I/2' S1' 8 I/2• 132' 17 I/2' Q SECTION MAX. MIN. MAX. MIN. 54• 9' 138' 17 1/2' • 3'-6' 66' f0 I/4- 138• 17 1/2' S7' 144' 18' 3 N-M-P-O 2'-10 I/2" 69• 10 3/4- t44• 18' 60' 9 1/2' a C-C II' 8 1/2' 16 15' 72• n• Q _ 071 REVISIONS: APPROVED STA "I 00/00/00 a s oj �'w e 342 CHRIS A. VOGT �Of (LARGE CITY ENGINEER MANHOLE PIPE TO PIPE RCE 44250 SIDE INLET SHEET 1 OF 3 NOTES I. VALUES FOR A. B. C. Di . D2. ELEVATION R AND ELEVATION S ARE SHOWN ON THE PROJECT DRAWINGS. ELEVATION S APPLIES AT INSIDE WALL OF STRUCTURE. SS 2. WHEN DEPTH M FROM STREET GRADE TO THE TOP OF THE BOX IS LETS THAN 2' -IO I/2" FOR PAVED STREETS OR 3 S"N"". CONSTRUCT MONOLITHIC SHAFT PER SECTION C C AND DETAIL SHAFT FOR ANY DEPTH OF MANHOLE MAY BE CENTEROFUCTED SHAFTEMAYECTION C-C. WHEN DIAMETER Di IS 48" OR LESS. BE LOCATED PER NOTE 3. 3. CENTER OF MANHOLE SHAFT SHALL BE LOCATED OVER CENTER ALINE OF STORM DRAIN WHEN DIAMETER DI IS N8 SOSAT SWHICH CSE W WITH CENTER LINE. PLACE E BARS SYMMETRICALLY AROUND HAFT 4. LENGTH OF MANHOLE MAY BE INCREASED AT OPTION TO MEET PI -PE ENDS, BUT ANY CHANGE IN LOCATION OF SPUR MUST BE APPROVED BY T HE ENGINEER. 5. P SHALL BE 5" FOR D2= 96" OR LESS AND 8" FOR D2 OVER 96". 6. REINFORCEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615. GRADE 40. AND SSE HALL TERMINATE 1 I/20 CLEAR OF CONCRETE SURFACES UNLESS SHOWN. 7. FLOOR OF MANHOLE SHALL BE STEEL TROWELED TO SPRING LINE. 8. BOOY OF MANHOLE SHALL BE POURED IN ONE CONTINUOUS LONGITUDINAL KEYWAY EXCEPT THAT A CONSTRUCTION JOINT WITH A MAY ' BE PLACED AT SPRING LINE. 9. THICKNESS OF THE DECK SHALL VARY WHEN NECESSARY TO PROVIDE F LEVEL SEAT BUT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE TABULAR VALUE F SHOWN ON TABLE, SH. I. 10. IF LATERALS ENTER ON BOTH SIDES OF MANHOLE. THAFT SHALL BE LOCATED ON SIDE RECEIVING THE SMALLER LATERAL. 11. STEPS SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD PLAN 635 OR 636. UNLESS NL SSLOWESTWtSE SHOWN. STEPS SHALL BE UNIFORMLY SPACED T E �NOVE 5" OC. . o STEP SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN 24 ABOVE N c 12. THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA SHALL BE USED FOR THIS MANHOLE: A. THIS STANDARD PLAN IS USED WHEN C.L.Q. STD. No.340 IS Z INADEQUATE. MAIN LINE = 36" INSIDE DIAMETER OR LARGER. c B. LATERAL = 12" TO 144" INSIDE DIAMETER HOWEVER. M3ft OF INSID Q DIAMETER SHALL NOT EXCEED THE INSIDE DIA E 3 MAIN LINE. 072 ajQ Gm a REVISIONS: APPROVED STANDARD 00 00/00 _4 �J s s 34.2 CHRIS A. VOGT. CITY ENGINEER MANHOLE PIPE TO PIPE (LARGE RCE 44250 SIDE INLET) SHEET 2 OF 3 0 • 0 N N ch O Z C co • 13. MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD PLAN 630 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 14, MANHOLE SHAFT SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD PLAN 324 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 15. WHERE A MANHOLE SHAFT - 36-INCH WITHOUT REDUCER IS SPECIFIED REFER TO STANDARD' PLAN 326. 16. WHERE A PRESSURE MANHOLE SHAFT - WITH ECCENTRIC REDUCER IS SPECIFIED REFER TO STANDARD PLAN 328. 17, WHERE A PRESSURE MANHOLE SHAFT - 36-INCH WITHOUT IS SPECIFIED REFER TO STANDARD PLAN 329. THE FOLLOWING A.P.W.A. STANDARD PLANS ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE: 324 326 328 329 630 633 635 636 MANHOLE SHAFT - WITH ECCENTRIC REDUCER MANHOLE SHAFT - 36-INCH WITHOUT REDUCER PRESSURE MANHOLE SHAFT - WITH ECCENTRIC PRESSURE MANHOLE SHAFT - 36-INCH WITHOUT REDUCER 24 - I NCH MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER. 36-INCH MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER STEEL STEP POLYPROPYLENE PLASTIC STEP APPROVED 00/00/00 1 s �M Of 4 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER MANHOLE PIPE TO PIPE RCE 44250 SIDE INLET) 073 c , STANDARD itiNN W ' (LARGE 342 SHEET 3 OF 3 SIZE AND SPACING OF STEEL AS SHOWN ON PROJECT DRAWINGS. EXCEPT THAT 5 BARS ON EACH SIDE OF SHAFT SHALL BE NOT SMALLER THAN # 5 G 4' OC OR EOUIVALENT A. B OR C� — J A PLAN (SHAFT NOT SHOWN) ati I � • r•T•Taj �Z Lf f 1 • N N SECTION A - A MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER PER STD. PLAN 630 STREET GRADE ;�, w m M cMANHOLE SHAFT PERSTD. PLAN 324w w N 5'x2' PIPE SEAT O C7 N7 3 • 0 - Z I OMIT FILLET f° UNDER SHAFT rr=f co • STEPS Q #504' OC x 5' —0" LONG tB OR C 5 BARS 7'-0' LONG. 4' OC. OF SIZE SHOWN FOR TRANSVERSE STEEL. BUT NOT SMALLER THAN #5 BARS. WARP THESE BARS UNDER BARS THAT HAVE BEEN CUT FOR SHAFT OPENING 5'xl' RING SEAT STREET GRADE CONCRETE RINGS PER STD. PLAN 324 4` w J �ti -T—�= • ' ca OMIT FILLET LLuj UNDER SHAFT f' 1.I 4 v) STEPS ' SECTION C - C SEE NOTE I TABLE OF VALUES FOR M (SEE NOTE U SECTION PAVED STREET UNPAVED STREET MAX. MIN. MAX. MIN. B - B - 2` -10 I /2' - 3' -6' C - C (SEE NOTE 1) 8 1/2' (SEE NOTE Il 15' 3 SECTION B - B a Q REVISIONS: APPROVED , 00/00/00 j scu f 4� CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER MANHOLE -.CONCRETE BOX STORM RICE 44250 nn A r AI STANDARD 343 SHEET 1 OF 2 • 0 N co O Z C cn Q 3 a Q • NOTES l . WHEN DEPTH M FROM STREET GRADE TO THE TOP OR 3 —6 FOR OF THE BOX IS LESS UNPAVED STREETS. THAN 2' —10 1/2" FOR PAVED STREETS CONSTRUCT SHAFT PER SECTION C—C. 2. STATIONS OF MANHOLES SHOWN ON PROJECT DRAWING., IR SHAFT. LINE OF SHAFT. ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN AT CENTER LINE OF 3. REINFORCEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615. GRADE 40. AND SHE LL UNLESS OTHERWISE TERMINATE 1 I/2" CLEAR OF CONCRETE SURFACES SHOWN. 4 STEPS SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD PLAN 635 OR 63"6. UNLESS OTHERWISE THE LOWEST SHOWN. STEPS SHALL BE UNIFORMLY SPACED OC. STEP SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN 24" ABOVE HE INOVER 5. MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD PLAN 630. UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 6. MANHOLE SHAFT SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD PLAN 324 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 7. WHERE A MANHOLE SHAFT — 36—INCH WITHOUT REDUCER IS SPECIFIED REFER TO STANDARD PLAN 326. 8. WHERE A PRESSURE MANHOLE SHAFT — WITH ECCENTRIC REDUCER IS SPECIFIED REFER TO STANDARD PLAN 328. 9. WHERE A PRESSURE MANHOLE SHAFT — 36—INCH WITHOUT REDUCER IS SPECIFIED REFER TO STANDARD PLAN 329. A.P.W.A. STANDARD PLANS ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE: THE FOLLOWING 324 MANHOLE SHAFT WITH CETRIC REDUCER 326 _ MANHOLE SHAFT 36 NCHWNTHOUT REDUCER 328 PRESSURE MANHOLE SHA— 36THNCHCWNTRIC THOUT REDUCER 329 630 PRESSURE MANHOLE SHAFT 24—INCH MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER 633 36—INCH MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER 635 STEEL STEP 636 POLYPROPYLENE PLASTIC STEP REVISIONS: APPROVED ti 00/00/00 3 z CHRIS A. VOGT Of CITY ENGINEER MANH RCE 44250 397 075 STANDARD Twit 343 LE -CONCRETE BOX STORM DIN I SHEET 2 OF 2 0 • ¢_ MAIN LINE RCP OR REINFORCED MONOLITHIC ARCH. SEE NOTE 2 ' r4 J SEE NOTE IO H H D R� T 3- MIN. 3p j (L LATERAL/ CONNECTOR PIPE \ / G BARS W ,m Ia 84 0 6' OC i m W o ►- o f I EDGE ROUND ---- - 03 OR # 4 0 18' OC w z o z I TO 3' R TIE BARS w U N a N E AND F BARS z w 0 Ir U m N SPUR --� STA. POINT CONNECTOR PI I 3• MIN. SEE NOTE 3 STA. POINT LATERAL SEE NOTE 3 PLAN REINFORCING STEEL I 3' MIN. SPRING / LINE /ROUND �I EL G E S -r— ELEV.IS- 03 UNDISTURBED EARTH 01 z a 3 a Q REVISIONS: H #3 OR # 4 0 18' OC TIE BARS G BARS # 4 0 6' OC c l 5: m r ELEV. R RS # 5 l CB3 OC F- .' F BARS # 5 . ® 3- OC / CONCRETE CRADLE. H 420-C-2000. SEE NOTE 9 SECTION Z-Z 05 ® 3. OC. SEE NOTE 8 TABLE OF VALUES FOR T B (INCHES) T (INCHES) 12 5 15 5 18 S 21 5 24 5 1/2 27 5 I/2 30 6 33 6 1/2 36 6 1/2 39 7 SECTION M-M BARS G BARS 076 APPROVED STANDARD 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT f iM Of o 350 CITY ENGINEER JUNCTION STRUCTURE - PIPE TO RCE 44250 SHEET 1 OF 2 PIPE (INLET W>2WOR>112 MA NOTES 1. HIS JUNCTION STRUCTURE SHALL BE USED WHEN THE OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF THE LATERAL IS GREATER THAN 1/2 THE INSIDE DIAMETER D OF THE MAIN LINE: OR WHEN THE INSIDE DIAMETER B OF THE LATERAL IS GREATER THAN 24': 8 SHALL NOT EXCEED 3/4 D OR 39'. T 2. IF THE MAIN LINE IS A REINFORCED MONOLITHIC ARCH STORM DRAIN. D SHALL REFER TO THE CLEAR SPAN OF THE ARCH. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE CUT AND PIPE. A CONCRETE CRADLETO THE JUNCTION S15 NOTURE IN THE SAME REOUI ED FOR A MANNER AS FOR A P E REINFORCED MONOLITHIC ARCH. 3. STATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROJECT DRAWINGS FOR LATERALS APPLY AT THE INTERSECTION OF CENTER LINES OF MAIN LINE AND LATERAL. STATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROJECT WOFGTHE RNS DE WALL OF THE MAINCONNECTOR L NE WITH APPLY AT THE INTERSECTION THE CONNECTOR PIPE CENTER LINE. 4. VALUES FOR A. B. C VA D SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROJECT DRAWINGS. ELEVATION R AND ELETION S SHALL BE SHOWN ONLY WHEN REOU RED PER NOTE 5. 5. a. ELEVATIONS R AND S NEED NOT BE SHOWN ON THE PROJECT DRAWINGS IF THE INLET PIPE IS TO ENTER THE MAIN. LINE RADIALLY. b. ELEVATION R PROVBIDED IN THE MAIN THE PROJECT LINE FOR DRAWINGS STUB IS TO BEE FOR FUTURE CONNECTION OF AN INLET PIPE. c. ELEVATION S SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROJECT DRAWINGS IF AN INLET PIPE I5 TO ENTER A STRAIGHTMAIN NGRADEER THAN RADIALLY. FROM ELEVATION S TO INLETPIPEIPE SHALL BE LAID ON CATCH BASIN OR GRADE BREAK IN LINE. 5. THE INLET PIPE SHALL ENTER THENLINE THE MAIN RADIALLY OTHER THgNOTHERWISE INDICATED. THE INLET PIPE MAY ENTER RADIALLY IF ANGLE A IS GREATER THAN TER OF THE 4NLE BP PE ES50. IS SLESS THANTHAN OR EIO/2Ap; TO 24• AND THE OUTSIDE DIA E OTHERWISE. C.L.O. STD. No. 354. 7. NO MORE THAN ONE OPENING SHALL BE MADE IN ANY ONE SECTION OF PIPE. g, THE OPENING FOR THE BREAKOUT' SHALL BE RECTANGULARND CUT STEEL. NORMAL AL TO THE PIPE SURFACE WITHOUT DAMAGING THE REINFORCING TRANSVERSE REINFORCEMENT OF THE ENT01N LINE THE TOPHALL BE CUT AT AND BOTTOM SLABS OF CENTER OF THE OPENING AND BEN THE SPUR. 9. THE MAIN LINE SHALL BE REINFARCONCRETE ENCASEMENT CED WITH A CONCRETE CS REOU REO IF A RADLE AND ENCASEMENT (AS APPLICABLE). JOINT IN THE MAIN LINE FALLS WITHIN 2THE LIMITS OFTTHE OP OFCRADLE. THE THE CONCRETE ENCASEMENT SHALL EXTEND 1 LINE AND TAIN O THE LIMITS OF THE CRADLE. IF CONNECTING TO AN EXISTING STORM DRAIN, PORTION OF CRADLE m OPPOSITE INLET MAY BE OMITTED. i 10. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615, GRADE 40. AND BE . PLACED I I/2' CLEAR FROM CONCRETTSA PO POINT THAN ESS WISE o SHOWN F BARS SHALL BE CARRIEDO DISTANCE FROM CENTER LINE WITH J=7D/12 + 60• . 11. FLOOR OF THE SPUR SHALL BE STEEL -TROWELED TO THE SPRING LINE OF Q 3 THE SPUR. 399 077 a ` a REVISIONS: APPROVED STANDARD 00/00 00 'V � 350 CHRIS A. VOGT Of CITY ENGINEER JUNCTION STRUCTURE -PIPE TO -- RCE 44250 Fn7DC / T IV I FT T n>24 ° OR> 1 SHEET 2 OF 2 • t LATERAL/CONNECTOR PIPE —CONC. PIPE, RCP OR CSP i C MAIN LINE RCP C MAIN LINE RCP I a 4. i CLASS C 1/2' MIN. MORTAR N I SEE NOTE 4 M STA. PT. I f B BEDDING OF Rv INLET PIPE ;;... Bz45 i I SEE NOTE 6 BACKFILL WITH Y lA1145° 420-C-2000 �•'' �•`' c - CASE I PLAN CONCRETE OR COMPACT SOIL TO RELATIVE DENSITY ? REOUIRED BY SPECIFICATIONS ' UNDISTURBED EARTH BEDDING. PER SPECIFICATIONS CASE I SECTION B-B FOR OUTLET SEE STD. CATCH BASIN PLANS 0f q. CATCH BASIN FLOOR 00 • s 420-C-2000 1/2 OD MIN. •`'' '" CONC. ENCASEMENT, SEE NOTE 5 CONC. PIPE. BACKFILL '''�•�•'� 6• RCP OR CSP BEDDING SEE NOTE 3 I/2' MIN. / SEE NOTV 4 h OD -- - 1�B>450 - -- CASE I CASE 2 SECTION C-C (SEE NOTES 9 a 10) VARIES TO SUIT 4' MIN. CONDITIONS z CLASS C MORTAR O v N co co Z _ L_— — — — c� STA. ��P+ O • y PLAN SECTION a CASE 3 078 3 SADDLE CONNECTION V0 •a Q REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 L u/Y J 1 fiutr l uric - 8 PIPE (ID < 24 " STANDARD 351 SHEET 1 OF 2 • 0 N co 0 0 z c 0 ,� 3 o. Q U NOTES CASE I AND CASE 2 I. IF ANGLE A IS LESS THAN 450 OR IF D IS LARGER THAN 24", THEN ANOTHER STANDARD STRUCTURE SHALL BE SPECIFIED. 2. THE OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF THE INLET PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE-HALF THE INSIDE DIAMETER OF THE MAIN LINE. 3. THE INLET PIPE SHALL ENTER THE MAIN LINE RADIALLY. IF THE INLET PIPE CANNOT ENTER RADIALLY, THEN ANOTHER STANDARD STRUCTURE SHALL BE SPECIFIED. 4. THE SIZE OF THE OPENING INTO THE MAIN LINE SHALL BE THE OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF THE INLET PIPE PLUS I" MINIMUM TO 3" MAXIMUM. 5. ALL CONNECTOR PIPES FOR CASE 2 SHALL BE ENCASED IN CONCRETE IF LAID WITHIN THE MAIN LINE EXCAVATED TRENCH OR IF LAID ON FILL WHICH HAS NOT BEEN DENS I F I ED. 6. BURN OR CHIP END OF CONNECTOR PIPE FLUSH WITH INNER SURFACE OF MAIN LINE. ROUND EDGE OF CONCRETE PIPE OR RCP. . v 7. ALL CSP AND FITTINGS SHALL BE GALVANIZED. 8. STATION SPECIFIED ON THE PROJECT DRAWINGS APPLIES AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE INSIDE WALL OF MAIN LINE AND THE CENTER LINE OF INLET PIPE. 9. CASE 2 SHALL NOT BE USED TO CONNECT TO THE FLOOR OF A GRATING CATCH BASIN WHERE THE GRATE WILL BE SUBJECT TO VEHICLE TRAFFIC. 10. FOR CASE 2, NOT MORE THAN 12' OF INLET PIPE SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE MAIN LINE EXCAVATED TRENCH. CA_ II. CONNECTIONS TO PIPES 21" OR LESS IN DIAMETER WITHOUT JUNCTION STRUCTURES OR PRECAST Y BRANCHES SHALL BE MADE WITH SADDLES. 12. THE OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF THE. INLET PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE-HALF THE INSIDE DIAMETER OF THE MAIN LINE. 13. TRIM OR CUT SADDLE TO FIT SNUGLY OVER THE OUTSIDE OF THE MAIN LINE SO ITS AXIS WILL BE ON THE LINE AND GRADE OF THE CONNECTOR PIPE. 14. THE OPENING INTO THE PIPE SHALL BE CUT AND TRIMMED TO FIT THE SADDLE SO THAT NO PART WILL PROJECT WITHIN THE BORE OF THE SADDLE PIPE. 15. THE CONNECTOR PIPE SHALL BE SUPPORTED AS SHOWN IN CASES 1 AND 2. REVISIONS: APPROVED 00 00/00 j CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 1 PIPE UD < 24 11 401- 079 STANDARD 351 SHEET 2 OF 2 • • —�Z_ MAIN LINE RCB I � N W BARS SEE NOTE 3 i ROUND EDGE TO3'R :D, STATION POINT. SEE NOTE 2 I Z+ I � i �Q / I I� ' z N I P CONSTRUCTION JOINT #3 OR # 0 18' C T �/IV 9� 4_ LATERAL / CONNECTOR PIPE T #4 ®18' OC F BARS BOTH WAYS TO BE USED ,� WHEN B IS 60' OR MORE . Quo SECTION G-C cl) #3 OR #4 0 18' OC A ROUND EDGES TO APPROXIMATE R OF ID OF LATERAL WITH A MAXIMUM OF 3'-0" D8EBARS D.E.HaGBARS i CONSTRUCTION JOINT PLAN INEW OR EXISTING RCB. SEE NOTE 6 W BARS L7 D BARS ANY STANDARD F BARS PIPE JOINT 2-H BARS 4' OC. f- SEE NOTE 3 ROUND EDGES p #3 OR 04 `--- ELESEE VNOTE 0 18' OC m ELEV. R. SEE NOTE 8 C 8 E BARS 2-G BARS 4' OC. SEE NOTE 3 C '..:; .. UNDISTURBED EARTH n BACKFILL WITH 420-C-2000 MIX �- CONCRETE. OR COMPACT SOIL TO RELATIVE DENSITY REQUIRED BY SPECIFICATIONS. BACKFILL MAY BE i OMITTED IF STRUCTURE IS LAID ON Q UNDISTURBED EARTH TO STORM 3 SECTION Z-Z DRAIN WALL a Q REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 B (INCHES) T (INCHES) a m = w a m w 12 5 h 0 io 15 5 18 5 21 5 24 5 I/4 27 5 1/2 30 6 33 6 1/4 36 6 1/2 39 7 42 7 1/2 `0 0 , `� 45 7 3/4 48 8 51 8 1/2 54 9 57 9 1/4 60 9 1/2 63 10 66 10 I/4 69 10 3/4 72 II 78 II 3/4 84 12 1/2 90 13 1/4 r• 0 is 96 14 102 15 1/2 108 16 114 16 1/2 120 17 126 17 132 17 1/2 138 17 1/2 144 18 Zcuj s �M Of 44a JUNCTION STRUCTURE -PIPE TO RCB 1 80 STANDARD 352 SHEET 1 OF 2 NOTES • • I. VALUES FOR A, B AND C SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROJECT DRAWINGS. ELEVATION R AND ELEVATION S SHALL BE SHOWN WHEN REOUIRED PER NOTE 8. 2. STATIONS SPECIFIED ON THE PROJECT DRAWINGS APPLY AT THE INTER- SECTION OF CENTER LINES OF MAIN LINE AND LATERALS. EXCEPT THAT STATIONS FOR CATCH BASIN CONNECTOR PIPES APPLY AT INSIDE WALL OF STRUCTURE. 3. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615, GRADE 40. AND SHALL TERMINATE 1 1/2" CLEAR OF CONCRETE SURFACES UNLESS .,OTHERWISE SHOWN. o. W BARS ARE OF SIZE AND SPACING SPECIFIED FOR WALL STEEL ON PROJECT DRAWINGS, AND SHALL BE CUT IN CENTER OF OPENING AND BENT INTO TOP AND BOTTOM OF JUNCTION STRUCTURE. b. OMIT H BARS WHEN SOFFIT OF SPUR IS 12" OR LESS BELOW SOFFIT OF MAIN LINE. AND OMIT G BARS WHEN INVERT OF SPUR IS 12" OR LESS ABOVE FLOOR OF MAIN LINE. 4. JUNCTION STRUCTURE SHALL BE POURED MONOLITHICALLY WITH MAIN LINE, MANHOLE OR TRANSITION STRUCTURE. 5. FLOOR OF STRUCTURE SHALL BE STEEL -TROWELED TO THE SPRING LINE. 6. WHEN CONNECTING TO EXISTING RCB. BREAKOUT LIMITS AND DETAILS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROJECT DRAWINGS. 7. EMBEDMENT, P. SHALL BE 5" FOR B = 96" OR LESS AND 8" FOR B OVER 96". 8. IF ELEVATION R AND ELEVATION S ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE PROJECT DRAWINGS THEN THE INLET OPENING SHALL FALL 6" BELOW THE SOFFIT OF THE MAIN LINE WITH THE INLET PIPE LAID ON A STRAIGHT GRADE FROM MAIN LINE TO CATCH BASIN OR TO GRADE BREAK IN INLET LINE. ELEVATION S SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROJECT DRAWINGS IF THE INLET OPENING FALLS MORE THAN 6" BELOW THE SOFFIT OF THE MAIN LINE WITH THE INLET PIPE LAID ON A STRAIGHT GRADE AS STATED ABOVE. ELEVATION R SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROJECT DRAWINGS ONLY WHEN A STUB IS TO BE PROVIDED FOR A FUTURE CONNECTION. 9. LATERALS OR CONNECTOR PIPES 24" OR LESS IN DIAMETER SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 5' ABOVE THE INVERT. LATERALS OR CONNECTOR PIPES 27" OR LARGER IN DIAMETER SHALL BE -NO MORE THAN .18", ABOVE THE c INVERT. WITH THE EXCEPTION THAT CATCH BASIN CONNECTOR PIPES LESS THAN 50' IN LENGTH SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN 5' ABOVE THE � INVERT. c*) c 10. THE NEED FOR AN EDGE BEAM AND/OR ADDITIONAL REINFORCEMENT Z SHALL BE INVESTIGATED BY THE ENGINEER FOR ANY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: coo. ANGLE A IS LESS THAN 30' b. TOP OF INLET PIPE IS LESS THAN 6" BELOW THE SOFFIT Q c. FLOW LINE OF INLET PIPE IS LESS THAN 7" ABOVE THE FLOOR OF 3 THE RCB AT THE INSIDE FACE a a REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00X4P „ V CHRIS A. VOGT Of 4 CITY ENGINEER JUNCTION STRUCTURE -PIPE TO RCE 44250 RCB 081 STANDARD 352 SHEET 2 OF 2 0 # 5 #5 0 6* OC # t MAIN LINE RCB PLAN L A 4 450. SEE NOTE I RP w BURN OR CUT -PIPE TO SURFACE Ir— OF CONCRETE. ROUND EDGES OF 0 z CONC. PIPE OR RCP w # 5 0 4' # 5 0 4' OC ui (n CONC. PIPE. RCP OR CSP CONC. PIPE. #5 RCP OR CSP Oc jr LONG FSEE NOTE 3 I EL CLEY - S 11 E' V'S RC BEAM BEDDING FOR SUPPORT Ca. INLET PIPE 1 1/2* # 5 0 4* OC 4 OC Q. 0. COLUMN SUPPORT MIN. Q BACKFILL WITH UNDISTURBED EARTH 420 —C-2000 CONCRETE' UNCOMPACTED BACKFILL 3. OR COMPACT SOIL TO RELATIVE DENSITY #5 0 4" OC REOUIRED BY THE MAX. SPECIFICATIONS CASE I SECTION A -A CASE 2 RFAM SUPPORT COLUMN SUPPORT D = 30' MAX. %.0 4 cf) ol z D 30" MAX. 00 MINIMUM BEARING SURFACE = 00/2 IINIMUM BEARING URFACE zz 00/2 OD SECTION - 082 a SECTION C-C - REVISIONS: APPROVED STANDARD 00/00/00 t4 CHRIS A. VOGT Of 353 CITY ENGINEER JUNCTZON -STRUCTURE -PIPE TO RCE 44250 RCB (INLET ID < 30 11) SHEET 1 OF 3 • • 0 4 cn cVJ 0 z 0 EJ a a 0 B BARS - # 6 0 4' OC, LENGTH = D+3' -O' PLACED UNDER CUT BARS AND ON TOP OF UNCUT BARS. OMIT BARS THAT FALL OVER SIDEWALLS. CONC. PIPE OR RCP v � 2 B BARS B BARS # 5 ® 4' BE PLAC CLEAR G, r ROVED 00/00 A. VOGT NGINEER 44250 FOR OUTLET SEE STANDARD CATCH BASIN PLANS CATCH BASIN FLOOR 7 , 420-C-20 00 CONCRETE / ENCASEMENT WHEN MORE THAN ONE SECTION OF 6. PIPE IS USED 'D RC BOX NOTE: WHEN CATCH BASIN FALLS ON TOP OF BOX THE B BARS OPENING MAY BE FORMED THROUGH FLOOR OF CATCH CASE 3 BASIN AND TOP SLAB OF BOX. TOP SLAB ENTRANCE D : 30' MAX. B BARS CUT BARS 2" CLEAR OF OPENING SECTION D-D a4 , cu f `vol UUNCTION STRUCTURE-PZFE TO RCB (INLET ID < 30" ) 0831 STANDARD 353 SHEET 2 OF 3 NOTES I. USE JUNCTION STRUCTURE PER C.L.Q.STD.No.352 INSTEAD OF THIS JUNCTION STRUCTURE UNDER ANY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: o. DIAMETER OF INLET PIPE EXCEEDS 30". b. TOP OF PIPE IS LESS THAN 12" BELOW SOFFIT OF -BOX. c. FLOW LINE OF PIPE IS LESS THAN 13" ABOVE FLOOR OF THE BOX AT INSIDE FACE. d. ANGLE A IS LESS THAN 450. 2. ALL CSP AND FITTINGS SHALL BE GALVANIZED. 3. ELEVATION S SHALL BE SPECIFIED ON PROJECT DRAWINGS ONLY IF THE TOP OF PIPE IS MORE THAN 12" BELOW SOFFIT OF BOX. 4. LATERALS OR CONNECTOR PIPES 24" OR LESS IN DIAMETER SHALL BE NOT MORE THAN 5' ABOVE THE INVERT. LATERALS OR CONNECTOR PIPES 27" OR LARGER IN DIAMETER SHALL BE NOT MORE THAN IS ABOVE THE INVERT. •XCEPTION THAN 50' TH THE EN LENGTH THAT CATCH BASIN CONNECTOR PIPES LESS HAN SHALL BE NOT MORE THAN 5' ABOVE THE INVERT. o ' 0 o 0 z o Q 3 084 a Q REVISIONS: APPROVED STANDARD 00/00/00Z � s .� 353 �'M Of FC�HRIS A. VOGTENGINEER JUN Tl N TRUCTURE-PIPE T RCE 44250 RCB (INLET ID < .30 n ) SHEET 3 OF 3 • O O O O Z G H co) a NN, .� 83 OR 14 a 180 0C t LATERAL / L POPE ECTOR ROUND. EDGES TO RADIUS OF APPROXIMATE ID OF LATERAL. MAXIMUM 36" 0P Q 9 A8BBARS 6" --{ � ROUND EDGES M T03"R - P SEE I P NOTE 8 N r- Q I I 4. MAIN LINE m - STATION STATION N' M #3 OR 84. SEE NOTE 4 STATION PT. D BARS PLAN D BARS #3 OR #4 I I I I ELEV. ELEV. I STA. STA. #4018" OC. BOTH WAYS. TO BE USED WHEN D2 IS 60" OR LONGITUDINAL SECTION MORE A BARS D BARS �I F BAIRS #3 OR 94 ~ ' PI #3 OR 4 B BARS co® 18" OC ELEV. R ELEV. S F----wr---r #4018" OC. BOTH WAYS. TO BE USED WHEN B IS 60" OR MORE MAIN LINE SECTION N'—N"—N"' PROJECTED_ ON M—M—N"' 407 085 Q REVISIONS: • APPROVED ,` STANDARD 00/00/00 FF cu 4 CHRIS A. VOGT of 354 CITY ENGINEER TRANSl TION STRUCTURE PIPE TO RCE 44250 PIPE SHEET 1 OF 2 T— FOR DIMENSIONS AND BAR SIZES D2 OR B (INCHES) F OR T (INCHES) " a mma m O 0 Q '^ U. 0 O � a 12 4 u O ',., u o ip .�. m 15 4 1/4 18 4 1/2 21 5 24 5 1/4 27 5 1/2 30 6 33 6 1/4 36 6 1/2 39 7 42 7 1/2 p 0 to o 0 45 7 3/4 48 8 51 8 1/2 54 9 57 9 1/4 60 63 9 I/2 10 66 10 1/4 69 IO 3/4 72 11 78 11 3/4 84 12 1/2 90 13 1/4 6 �n ® M 6 io 0 96 14 102 15 1/2 108 16 114 16 1/2 120 17 126 17 132 17 1/2 13e 17 1/2 144 18 C� J 0 0 It 0 0 z 0 co Q 3 a a NOTES I. THE HORIZONTAL ANGLE OF CONVERGENCE OR DIVERGENCE, e, SHALL NOT EXCEED 5045'. 2. VALUES FOR A. B. C. Di AND D2 ARE SHOWN ON THE PROJECT DRAWINGS. ELEVATION R AND ELEVATION S ARE SHOWN WHEN REQUIRED BY NOTE 10. 3. FLOOR OF STRUCTURE SHALL BE STEEL TROWELED TO SPRING LINE. 4. REINFORCEMENT STEEL SHALL CONROOF CONCRETE SURF�ACESDE 40, AND SHALL TERMINATE 1 1/2 CLEA UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. LONGITUDINAL BARS SHALL BE #3 OR #4 SPACED 18" OC OR LESS. 5. ELEVATION S APPLIES AT INSIDE WALL OF STRUCTURE. 6. TRANSITION STRUCTURE SHALL BE POURED IN ONE SHALL COq ENT OEUS OPERATION. EXCEPT THAT THE CO OPTION OF PLACING AT THE SPRING LINE A CONSTRUCTION JOINT LONGITUDINAL KEYWAY. 7. THE LENGTH OF THE STRUCTURE MAY BE INCREASED AT THE OPTION OF THE CONTRACTOR TO MEET RCP ENDS, USING D BARS, LONGITUDINAL AND BOTTOM REINFORCEMENT IN EXTENDED PORTION OF SAME DIAMETER AND SPACING ASEMUSTDBE APPROVED TABLE. BYTHEANY CHANGE IN THE LOCATION OF SPUR ENGINEER. 8. EMBEDMENT P SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN THE TABLE. UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PROJECT DRAWINGS. 9. WHEN THERE IS NO SPUR REQUIRED, A & B BARS SHALL BE OMITTED. 10. WHEN ELEVATION R AND ELEVATION S MAIN LIT SHOWN NE E RADIALL. OYPROJECT DRAWINGS. INLET PIPE SHALL ENTER INLET PIPE ENTERS MAIN LINE OTHER THAN A D RADIALLY. ELEVATION S SHALL BE SHOWN ON PROJECT DRAWINGS,INLET PE SHALL BE LAID ON A STRAIGHT GRADE FROE AT ON RI� HALL BE SHOWN AONN OR GRADE BREAK IN INLET LINE. EL PROJECT DRAWINGS ONLY WHEN STUB IS TO BE PROVIDED IN MAIN LINE FOR FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF INLET PIPE. II. THE MAXIMUM COVER ABOVE THIS STRUCTURE SHALL BE 25'. IF THE COVER EXCEEDS 25' A SPECIAL STRUCTURE HA L BE DESIGNED FOR THE COVER AND DETAILED ON THE PROJECT 408 os REVISIONS: APPROVED STANDARD 00/00/00 2. CHRIS A. VOGT �.°' 4 354 CITY ENGINEER TRANSITION STRUCTURE PIPE TO RCE 44250 PIPE SHEET 2 OF 2 6' Y SHOULDER -�. 0.42 0 U. lei CROSS -FALL PER 1/2 ' 1 0 STREET PLANS —� �.. •• o `L • 1211 • .. . i m N SECTION A - A • • It u_ W 0 c W n 00 0 = w cn L�L W (L 0 o y O a 0 � 0 0 3' R. C ; C 2' R. TOP OF DIKE PLAN G ao SECTION B - B NOTE: CROSS - SECTION OF SLOPE DITCH MAY BE SEMICIRCULAR, VEE, OR TRAPEZOIDAL MIN. TOP WIDTH = 55 , MIN. DEPTH = In 9" I co i i SECTION C - C o TO BE USED ON FILL SLOPES FLATTER THAN 4 : 1. cr) USE MIN. 10' LENGTH OF GUTTER ON BOTH SIDES c IN A SAG LOCATION. USE PIPE DOWNDRAINS FOR z SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4 : 1 SLOPES., c c 4 0, 9 087 REVISIONS: APPROVED • STANDARD 00/00/00 a _ j S4 Eyo 360 TA CHRIS A. VOGT OVERSIDE CITY ENGINEER ASPHALT CONCRETE RCE 44250 DRAIN SHEET 1 OF 1 0. 1 STEEL GRATE, THREE (3) SECTIONS 36" CLEAR SPACE � �� W413 SUPPORT BEAM ,,--NATIVE GROUND .............. 6" NUISANCE HATER INLET -� AIR VENT ASSEMBLY t1ODIFIED PRECAST UTILITY VAULT (TWO PIECES) FINE SAND, 33"DEEP 4" DRAIN LINE ARCH -TYPE LEACH LINE FILTER FABRIC COURSE ROCK FOOTING --/ '"- COURSE ROCK BEDDING ELEVAT[ON VIEV 5f-0" PLAN VfEV LENGTH AS SPECIFIED ON PROJECT PLANS 4.1.0 oss REVISIONS: APPROVED • STANDARD • 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT OF 4 370 CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 .SAND FfI L TER SHEET 1 OF 7 • E 82 7 81 � 82 PLAN VIEV 4'-0' T-0' 8' T T-0' s'-0"� SECTION Bl -Bl DETAIL 1, PAGE .3 yr v DETAIL 2, PAGE 3 0 FAIL 3, PAGE 3 OF 6 8'-0' T-0' 8'-0' SECTION B2-B2 I a PRECAST UPPER VAULT SECTION - 8`-0" x 6'-0" x 4'-0" I.D. I b PRECAST LOVER VAULT SECTION - 8'-0" x 6'-0" x 3'-0" I.D. O CflST-IN•PLflCE CONCRETE FLOOR . • 41 �.- 089 O CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE FOOTING REVISIONS: APPROVED , ►�� STANDARD 00/00/00 5 s4 rV CHRIS A. VOGT of 370 CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 SAND FILTER SHEET 2 OF 7 • is 2 2• 96" 4' . 88' 4 32" 1 4 DETAIL 2 DETAIL 48 32" 1 DETAIL 3 Ib PRECAST LOVER WALL PIECE Q2 CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE FLOOR (520-C•2500) O CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE FOOTING (520-C-2500) DETAIL 4 41090 REVISIONS: APPROVED STANDARD 00/00/00 5 �` CHRIS A VOGT f EyOfF V 370 CITY ENGINEER SAND FI L TER (floor &footing RCE 44250 - details) SHEET 3 OF 7 • NATIVE GROUND DE.10 4 •'y • $�:OR •�t�i``ry RECOMPACTED NATIVE SOIL • r } �ai`'ti 185L RELATIVE COMPACTION) yj ^ x�y<AI � ly .`,r OVERLAP FAB1C 18'MINIMUM C rr'N..•r •' 1r•U fJ •(y�y lyr. O. z y. r y • o. •y� O WI•. JY1•• �y�y O O O O V c V 36' SECTION A -A FIELD DRILL 5. 0.5 IN HOLES IN LID O 10 DETAIL C qO 1'-2' OPEN GRADED GRAVEL SO 34'WIDE x 15' HIGH ARCH -TYPE CHAMBER O NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ENGINEERING FABRIC TO 10' DIA. IRRIGATION VALVE BOX O 1'X1'SQ' SCHEDULE 40 PVC TEE 9O SAND REVISIONS: la 13 11 FLOP 10 LEACH FIELD 13 DETAIL D DETAIL E IS 11 0000 0000 DETAIL F 10 2'0.0. SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE II 4'O.D. PERFORATED SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE 12 4'O.D. SCHEDULE 40 PVC COUPLING 13 4' O.D. SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE Iq 4'x4'x2' SCHEDULE 40 PVC TEE 15 4' SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE CAP 413 091 APPROVED F ♦ STANDARD 00/00/00 `cu �'r OF 370 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEERF AND FI L TER RCE 44250 s SHEET 4 OF 7 0 • 0 C C �6 I A- A REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 TYPICAL LOCATION FOR GRATE FASTENER PLAN VIEW OF GRATE rl VANDAL -PROOF BOLT GRATE FASTENER BEARING BARS (TYPICAL) r----BEAM FLANGE TACK WELD NUT TO FLANGE UNDERSIDE A m �-6'---1 414 B.- g 092 STANDARD cuj S 'Of 370 GRATE FRAMING DETAILS SHEET 5 OF 7 0 SANDFILTER SIZING CALCULATIONS Calculation #1 - Determines how many standard size sandfilters are needed. No.* of Sandfilters = homes T 40 homes/sandfilter * Round all fractions up to the nearest whole number Comment: Each sandfilter has 48 sf of filter surface (ie 6' x 8'); assume the incoming nuisance water will percolate through the sand at the rate of 4.6 inches per hour. The sandfilter must be sized to handle the "surge inflow rate" of 0.458 cf/house/hour, which is based on the assumption that, on average, each house releases 12 gallons in a 3.5 hour "surge" period. Therefore, each sandfilter is capable of handling 18.4 cf/hour. As a result, each sandfilter can handle the nuisance water released by 40 homes (18.4/0.458=40). Calculation #2 - Determines how long the leach line must be. Leach Line Length* = homes x 0.617 If/home * In feet to be divided evenly between the number of sandfilters Comment: Usually, the critical aspect in sizing the leach line length is related to its storage capacity during the surge period. During the surge period, the sandfilter delivers filtered nuisance water to the leach line chamber at a rate faster than the water can percolate into the soil (the soil percolation rate is assumed to be 2 inches per hour). Therefore, the leach line chamber must be sized to handle the entire 3.5 hour surge flow of 1.604 cf per house. The leach line chamber has a 2.6 cf capacity per lineal foot, therefore, the per house length of leach line chamber is 0.617 If/home (1.604/2.6=0.617) . NOTE: The standard formula for Calculation #2 is good for soil conditions where the soil infiltration rate is as low as 1�.5 inches per hour. If, however, the infiltration rate is less than 1.5 inches per hour, the leach line must be sized using the following alternate formula, which has a 2.0 factor of safety included in the formula. LLL=2x(2.674xNH) =(5.66xSIR) Where: LLL = Leach Line Length; SIR = Soil Infiltration Rate (in/hr); NH = Number of Houses REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 'CHRIS A. VOGT Of CITY ENGINEER I L TER RCE 44250 SAND F 415 093 STANDARD 370 SHEET 6 OF 7 0 • SANDFILTER Materials Specifications • Precast Vault Structure - The vault structure shall be a precast utility vault manufactured in two sections: 1-36" section, and 1-48" section, similar to Quikset Series 450 & 650 as manufactured by Associated Concrete Products, Inc., of Santa Ana, CA. (1-714-557-7470), or approved equal. A galvanized steel frame to accommodate the grate shall be fitted per Sheet 5 of 7 prior to casting the top section. • Sandfilter Grate - The sandfilter grate shall be galvanized welded steel bar, Model GW-100 with (1 x 3/16" bars) and banded ends, as manufactured by the McNichols Co. (1-800-237-3820), or approved equal. Four (4) grate panels measuring 37" x 49" shall be provided, (Note: Gross opening size is 8'-3" x 6'- 3"). Use CB saddle type retainer clips as manufactured by McNichols to secure grates. • Support Beam - The grate support beam shall be W413, 8'-2" long, Fy=36 ksi steel. • Leach Line - The leach line shall be constructed of arch -type chamber sections, High Capacity InfiltratorTMmodel, as distributed by Boyd Tanks Co. (1-909-657- 6966), or approved equal. • Engineering Fabric - The engineering fabric shall be fine spun non -woven, Dupont's Typar Style 3601, as distributed by Aldrich Supply Co (1-909-371- 3018), or approved equal. • Filter Sand - The fine filter sand shall be, 100% passing a No. 45 sieve (.35mm) with a uniformity coefficient between 2 and 3. REVISIONS: APPROVED ^ ,` STANDARD 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT F"°' 370 CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 1 SAND FI L TER SHEET 7 OF 7 0 O O cc O Z G cc 0 U 0 GVFtV E mob Wft 4 4 � V V N , 1 ' \ i LLI ; WI f \ 1 m � �y 1 ` U 1 1 1 1 1 1 W ,�-'=----- --- --------------- -------------- -0 _ �T U � a = I 1 W I ui U � I J ClC B B U- C NOTE: A A OFFSET MAY BE LOCATEDI- -I- - - - i EITHER LEFT OR RIGHT. m Go N c� co w ti w rn rnrn ti car chi ccoo Ln m U U 4 c� N N chi N N N N to N N 01 cq J NCD T t N v U) q Vto m N j m OC U J O m Zo cc m co m �m c* 2 c N co to W v N � M M N N !0 p tO ao U cm I V m T N Q MIV 0 N `i c 0 N N N m N N % N N Lo v- N J ti Lo � � co N to ti N p c0 uni o T T T o T T T o T U m U J co ti Cl N P- N o b b r- T T T T T T 4 N M N N N N N N N O T N N N N m c� W ccri j � c) v N N m cpnpp b 'V ado � N cif N v- %— v- v- O N cci ED ZO ZO N N ZO N N Q N N m cm cc i chi are 29 REVISIONS: APPROVED 00 00/00 s61 CHRIS A. VOGT `� 4 4 Q&rA CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 OFFSET CUL - DE - SAC Q LL. LLI 0 W 4 1T L �— 095 STANDARD 401 SHEET 1 OF 2 • • Q • I GvRv E 2 a 4 � N ' W U of W) LJ. i c ' � U 1 1 � 1 i i ` E w 1 o V V) W V � J C U. B B U. C NOTE: A A OFFSET MAY BE LOCATED EITHER LEFT OR RIGHT. REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 0 CD co IV 0 a J is g Gioi�i Go � o C` � ago v�i ti Lu uu v- Go oC v- U c<O N iA O Q«� �rN�N_Wi c7 � N c7 N N N N U N N Cr)ao S S g � O V" W I J r v th � N M NN M N v v N m O N S U. Nco W � J tD m ch �p ch t�D oN0 Q W v ci r ci r r r r N r M r 0 U ��pp �ppp pppp pp ��pp pp S N c07 1 � S N Cl � S M N M N � � _ � V" N N N N N N N N OD S ti N !G W r%i co I C� IS S S S S S S I oC lw- Q u. 0 NV, ti O N N 'd~, J • m W) � � CD Lo U_ .� U W O b to r r r r r r e— r v— co r oopo 4 N Cr) N Lo N N N N ov-U ov- N N N ch ch oto WCIO) to v- e- j Npp. N m qw cM N S CD O� cc cV vi o� cVCi = v CDr v v- r W U ----- m ED bo ao N N N N U Q N N 5 s4 cu h ty O! OFFSET CUL - DE - SAC _. 096 STANDARD 401 SHEET 2 OF 2 • • r i r � r � f � IFL ip.. B 2 R CURB AND GUTTER i 4 i R5 R B --LL_ i FL- C ' CURB GUTT CU R2 ,gW , r now ; O ER 90'00'0'� ;� � \ � P~ RT1' LINE�' �3 \\ I CROWN LINE N ' w•w i Al i R� r � I 1 25' REGARDLESS OF R/W WIDTH I SEE STANDARD #452 FOR SIDEWALK Rs ON INSIDE OF KNUCKLE. R 4&2 ---------------~ -F- &3=A1(VARIABLE) + 2A2 Y=E+T "I� R= 2A + 10' C �•— B B —•I c D + T1= 50.00' A A ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT I R/W WIDTH A B 50 32' 25' 16' 561 36' 28' 18' °0 60, 36' 30' 18' z 60' 40' 30' 20' 0 66' 44' 33' 22' co 78' 56' 39' 28' 0 88' 64' 44' 32' REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 D E R 1 R 2 R 3 0 2 R4 T1 R5 T2 C 69.09' 34' 51' 60' 10023' 20" 100, 9.09' 109 9.91, 9' 40.91' 70.00' 35' 56' 66' 100 17'48" 100, 9.01' 110, 9.91, 10' 40.99' 70.60' 37' 58' 70' 10014' 12" 100' 8.96' 112' 10.03' 12' 41.04' 70.60' 35' 60' 70' 10014' 12" 100' 8.96' 110' 9.85' 10' 41.04' 71.49' 36' 65' 76' 100 08' 58" 100' 8.86' 111' 9.86' 11' 41.12' 73.23' 1 74.65' 36' 37' 77' 1 86' 88' 98' 9058' 58" 1 V 51' 06" 100' 100' 8.73' 18.621, 111' 112' 9.69' 9.65' 11' 41.26' 12' 41.38' STANDARD -KNUCKL E -- 097 tEEE ANDARD 405 T 1 OF 1 • 0 co 0 z I i VARIABLE I I * R TO FL ---- I / I • J I ' R/W LINE LL- 0--- J � I BACK OF CURB Q j E.C.R. W l t oao FL � I a I > I I -lq - REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 R = 25' IF BOTH STREETS HAVE A WIDTH LESS THAN HIGHWAY STANDARD NO. 145 (INDUSTRIAL COLLECTOR "Bell 64' RNV) R = 35 IF EITHER STREET HAS A WIDTH EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN STANDARD NO. 145, EXCEPT IN CASES WHERE SPECIAL DESIGN EXISTS. VARIABLE 098 STANDARD a ^ Z J .of 410 fy PROPERTY LINE -CORNER CUT - BACKq CURB RETURN RADIUS SHEET 1 OF 1 • • 4 3 a a �-1 Y=2.25M6)2 L L=LENGTH OF TAPER W=MAXIMUM OFFSET DISTANCE X=DISTANCE ALONG BASELINE Y:OFFSET FROM BASELINE L DISTANCE X 6 0 ' 5' 10' 15' 2 0' 2 5' 1 30- 3 5' 4 0' 4 5' 5 0' 5 5' 6 0' 72' 6' 12' 18' 24' 30' 36' 42' 48' 54' 60' 66' 72' 90' 7.5' 15' 22.5' 30' 37.5' 45' 52.5' 60' 6 7.5 75' 82.5' 90' 120' 10' 20' 30' 40' 50' 60' 70' 80' 90' 100' 110' 1 120' 150' 12.5' 25' 37.5' 50' 62.5' 75' 87.5' 100' 112.5' 125' 137.5 150' W OFFSET Y 10' 0.16' 0.62' 1.41' 2.50' 3.75' 5.00' 6.25' 7.50' 8.59' 9.38' 9.84' 110.00' 11' 0.17' 0.69' 1.55' 2.75' 4.13' 5.50' 6.88' 8.25' 9.4 5' 10.31' 10.83' 11.00' 12' 0.19' 0.75' 1.69' 3.00' 4.50' 6.00' 7.50' 9.00' 10.31' 11.25' 11.81' 12.00' 19 ' 0.30' LIT 2.6 7' 4.75' 7.13' 9.50' 11.88' 14.25' 16.3 3' 17.81' 18. 70' 19.00' 2 0' 0.31' 1.25' 2.81' 5.00' 7.50' 10.00' 12.50' 15.00' 17.19' 18.75' 19.69' 20.00' 21' 0.33' 1.31' 2.95' 5.25' 7.88' 10.50' 13.13' 15.75' 18.05' 19.69' 20.67' 21.00' 22' 0.34'. 1.38' 3.09' 5.50' 8.25' 11.00' 13.75' 16.50' 18.91' 20.62' 21.66' 22.00' NOTE: TO DETERMINE OFFSET DISTANCE FOR ANY LENGTH OF TAPER USE THE FORMULA Y= 2.25W(X)2 FOR THE PORTIONS AB' AND CID' WHICH ARE PARABOLIC CURVES. THE PORTION B'C' IS A TANGENT. WHEN THE BASELINE IS CURVED. THE OFFSETS ARE APPLIED TO THE CURVED BASELINE AND B'C' IS NO LONGER A TANGENT. A ,y 4 099 REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 MEDIAN TAPER STANDARD 415 SHEET 1 OF 1 PARABOLIC L FLARE z 3a x mEASE LINE-7 y T ---� 3 t 6 TANGENT 6 R y ZM A) 2 L L = LENGTH OF FLARE IN FEET W - MAXIMUM OFFSET DISTANCE IN FEET. X —DISTANCE ALONG BASE LINE IN FEET Y = OFFSET FROM BASE LINE IN FEET OFFSET Y • F X- I 10' 15' 20. 2 5' 3 O' 4 0' 4 5' 1 5 C FAR W/ L • 1: 5 TAN 6=2w T = R TAN T = TANGENT R = RADIUS OF NOSE IN FEET MEDIAN NOSE -0000 1 mom FOR W/ L = 1:10 '30, 0:20 0.45' 0.80 1.25' 1.80' 3.20' 4.05' 5.00' 1010' OTO. 0.23' 0.40' 0.63' 0.90' 1.60' 2.03' 2.50' 3.60' 4.90' 5.63' 6.40' 8.10' 10.00' FOR W/L a 1:15 O r 45' 0.15' 0.33' 0.59' 0.93' 1.33' 2.37' 3.00' r 75' 0.09' -0.20' 0.36' 0.56' 0.80' 1.42' 1.80� 2.22' 3.20' 4.36' 5.00' 90' 0.07' 0.17' 0.30' 0.46' 0.67' 1.19' 1.50, 1.85' 2.67 3.63' 4.17' 4.74' 6.00' 0 Z 0 N Q N- 422 3 IF STATION OF RADIUS POINT IS NOT GIVEN ON PLAN, TANGENT 'T' MAY BE IGNORED. 100 a REVISIONS: APPROVED / STANDARD 00/00/00 s CHRIS A. VOGT °' 416 CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 MEDIAN FLARE SHEET 1 OF 1 • • CURB AND GUTTER m A CURB FACE EDGE OF GUTTER SEE NO rE 3 ; PCC ON CMB z SLE NOTE 3 0 a r r LA W W AC PVMT Fr W12 W12 l TYPICAL BUS PAD SEE NOTE 2 W _ SEE NOTE 3 SIDEWALK CURB AND GUTTER SECTION A -A 4T SEE NOTE II EX. SIDEWALK. PCC PCC SEE NOTE 4 I ' rn m CURB AND 'o: •.•�o: GUTTER :.•t; F [EX. m co m o — Z CURB _ AND GUTTER j CM8 CMB SEE NOTE 5 Q ' 3 SECTION B-B �SECTION C-C 4 2 --- o� a Q REVISIONS: APPROVED it 4 00 00 00 s s F' V 61 CHRIS A. VOGT f~Of CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 CONCRETE BUS PAD STANDARD 420 SHEET 1 OF 2 0 r� ,L--] W EX. GUTTER WIDTH OR 2 � N wo �- SEE NOTE 6 0 F- 1' I / PCC X 0. W EX. CURB —�I--._--- _ 1 I SEE NOTE 4 - CMB SECTION D-D PCC rKAF W 12' PCC I I * AC PAVEMENT (C2-AR-4000) JOIN EX. ACr ,.. PVMT -� SECTION E-E SEE NOTE 14 - _---7 -AC ^PVMT- 1 'h TO 12 BATTER SECTION F-F NOTES* I. DIMENSIONS* (UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN) L= 85' T= 8" W= 10' B` 6' 2. USE SECTION B-B FOR EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER THAT IS TO REMAIN USE SECTION C-C FOR NEW CURB AND GUTTER USE SECTION D-D FOR EXISTING CURB THAT IS TO REMAIN 3. USE SECTION E-E FOR EXISTING AC PAVEMENT USE SECTION F-F FOR NEW AC PAVEMENT 4. AT LOCATIONS WHERE PCC PAVEMENT WILL BE ABUTTING AGAINST EXISTING CONCRETE. AN EPDXY, APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACES PRIOR TO CONCRETE PLACEMENT. S. IF B + T IS EOUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 12". CMB SHALL EXTEND UNDER NEW CURB AND GUTTER. 6. CONSTRUCT LONGITUDINAL WEAKENED -PLANE JOINT TO MATCH ADJOINING EXISTING GUTTER WIDTH, OR 2' IF NO ADJOINING GUTTER EXISTS. C 7. USE 2'X4" HEADER TO FORM 3-1/2 INCH STEP. TOP OF HEADER SHALL BE SET TO LINE AND GRADE. S. ALL EXPOSED PCC CORNERS TO BE ROUNDED WITH A 1/2' RADIUS. cf) 9. SURFACE OF CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A ROUGH TRANSVERSE BROOM FINISH. 10. WHERE DESIGNATED BY THE ENGINEER. UNDESIRABLE SUBGRADE MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CMB. Z II. WHERE NEW CURB AND GUTTER IS CONSTRUCTED ADJACENT TO EXISTING SIDEWALK. SIDEWALK SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED TO NEAREST SCORELINE. H 12. CONSTRUCT TRANSVERSE WEAKENED -PLANE JOINTS IN BUS PAD PAVEMENT AT APPROXIMATELY 10' INTERVALS. N 13. CONSTRUCT TRANSVERSE WEAKENED -PLANE JOINTS IN BUS PAD PAVEMENT AT ALL EXISTING CURB/CURB 6 GUTTER CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AND OR WEAKENED -PLANE JOINTS. Q 14. AT THE OPTION OF THE ENGINEER. THE EXISTING PAVEMENT MAY BE NEATLY SAWCUT AROUND THE 3 DIMENSIONS OF THE BUS PAD AND CONCRETE IS POURED DIRECTLY USING THE EXISTING PAVEMENT AS A FORM. a THE CONCRETE EDGES SHALL BE ROUNDED WITH A 1/2' RADIUS. . 4 2*2 a REVISIONS: APPROVED STANDARD 00 00/00 j440 CHRIS A. VOGT �Mo, 42"0 CITY ENGINEER S PAD RICE 44250 CONCRETE BU SHEET 2 OF 2 0 Cc v— cc 0 STAMP "TV'1N 3" LETTERS IN FACE OF CURB AT EACH CONDUIT LOCATION ECR BCR 3" CABLE T.V. DUCT TYPICAL CABLE T.V. DUCT SEE STANDARD NO. 410 FOR CURB RETURN RADIUS REQUIREMENTS. 3" CABLE T.V. DUCT STAMP 'WIN 3" LETTERS IN FACE OF CURB AT EACH CONDUIT LOCATION got j SIDEWALK Sri D !W!A U_ rl �WA�LK uj 7,7 o . . 3" CABLE T.V. DUCT TYPICAL CROSS SECTION 3" CABLE T.V. DUCTS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80 P.V.C., RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL CONDUITS, OR APPROVED EQUAL. 103 rw, 4.. mm� REVISIONS: APPROVED STANDARD 00/00/00 a. Of FCHRIS A. VOGT 4 450 CITY ENGINEER LOCATION OF CABLE TV DUCTS AT Y RCE 44250 STREET INTERSECTIONS ISHEET 1 OF 1 0 N 0 0 z 0 F- cn 0 REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 w w I 8 FT MINIMUM FROM EDGE OF TRAVELLED WAY (ETW) INCLUDING 6 FT MINIMUM FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT AS RIGHT OF WAY ALLOWS I FIXED OBJECT (UTILITY POLE, FIRE HYDRANT, ETC.) 6' LANE MIN. I WIDTH VARIES 10'-12' VARIABLE I ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS, DISTANCE MAY BE LESS FOR UNUSUAL CONDITIONS, AS APPROVED I BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR DESIGNEE. NOTE: TO AVOID FUTURE RELOCATIONS, ALL INSTALLATIONS SHOULD BY MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARDS 452. FOR APPLICATIONS ADJACENT TO CURB AND GUTTER USE STANDARDS 452. 0 F *Of FIXED OBJECT PLACEMENT FOR INTERIM ROADWAY CONDITIONS 104 STANDARD 451 SHEET 1 OF 1 ED PLANE JOINT AT APROXIMATELY V INTERVALS VARIABLE -+----6' MIN. TO FL SIDEWALK ON INSIDE OF KNUCKLE *1/2" EXPANSION MATERIAL `� SIDEWALK CURB FACE TILITY POLE OTHER THAN LINE TRANSMISSION POLE SHALL BE PLACED BEHIND SIDEWALK R � '-WEAKENED PLANE JOINT AT APROXIMATELY V INTERVALS V--VARIABLE 6' MIN. TO FL FIRE HYDRANT 1'-6" FROM SIDEWALK 8� 1' FROM CURB RETURN LINE FACE OF TRANSMISSION POLE SHALL BE PLACED 1'-6" BEHIND ___!________ FACE OF CURB. SIDEWALK SHALL BE WIDENED TO MIN. 6' CLEAR- ANCE FOR MIN. LENGTH OF 20'. MINIMUM TRANSITION LENGTH SHALL BE 10' .102010got MIN. MIN. MIN. ♦�� - - -- ZD SIDEWALK 4. ' :• CURB FACE ACCESS RAMP REQUIRMENTS SIDEWALK SEE STANDARD NO. 250-1/2 EXPANSION MATERIAL N_ 1. VARIABLE DISTANCES TO BE SHOWN ON APPLICABLE TYPICAL ROAD SECTION STANDARD. 2. CONSTRUCTION TO BE OF CLASS "B" CONCRETE 4" MINIMUM THICKNESS. REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHR I•S A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 5 s cu � - v 4 F'M Of 4 SIDEWALK, FIRE HYDRANT, UTILITY POLE LOCATION 1.1 105 STANDARD 452 SHEET 1 OF 1 • 0 m T m 0 z c ca • A WHITE REFLECTIVE LETTERS ON INTERSTATE B GREEN REFLECTIVE SHEETING II GALVANIZED POST 2" I.D. STD. PIPE 12'-0" LONG E L EXPANSION tO PAPER �E C=:� C II id B (ONE PIECE) I I 7 C I D SIDEWALK CONCRETE N N •'•. ,Q COMPACTED ,��''` ~ • b� EARTH • ;:.:. •' f 1 " ROUND ROD ANCHOR �I OR SQUARE DIRT LOCATION 1 17 i 12" A - 5/8" X 15" CADMIUM PLATED CARRIAGE BOLT B -14 GUAGE TOP AND CROSS SADDLE OF ANODIZED ALUMINUM C - SIGN PLATES. (ANODIZED ALUMINUM EXTRUSION OF 6063 T-4 ALLOY MATERIAL.) D - CAST ANODIZED ALUMINUM POST WITH THREE 3/8" ALLEN HEAD STAINLESS STEEL SET SCREWS. E - PLUG 1'-O" X 1'-0" X 1'-0" DEEP, EXPANSION PAPER ON ALL SIDES. SIDEWALK LOCATION 24" OR 30" 5/8" HOLE 2" LETTERS JLL SIDEWALK J w -►j [-*-6' SIDEWALK SIGN LOCATION N •'• I SIGN LOCATION LINE RIpNELINE a �A LK N zi�3 w MINOR STREET INSIDE OF KNUCKLE a INTERSECTION SIGN INSTALLATION DETAILS REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 NOTE: ONE COMPLETE NAME SIGN UNIT IS RE- QUIRED ON EACH INTERSECTION WHEN PAVED WIDTH OR CURBED WIDTH IS 40 FEET OR LESS; TWO COMPLETE NAME SIGN UNITS ARE REQUIRED FOR WIDTH GREATER THAN 40 FEET. WHEN TWO SIGN UNITS ARE PLACED THEY SHALL BE ON DIAGONALLY OPPOSITE CORNERS SO THAT THEY WILL BE ON THE FAR RIGHT-HAND SIDE OF THE INTERSECTION FOR TRAFFIC ON THE MORE IMPORTANT STREET. $ s 0 f' V .y Of STREET NAME SIGN � 8 10E L STANDARD 500 SHEET 1 OF 1 • 0 0 N O! r- O z 0 co a c� J 0 NOTES 2, I. STREET NAME AND BLOCK NUMBER PLATES SHALL BE ALUMINUM r.�...I ALLOY 6061 T6, 0.125 INCH THICK. = 2. STREET NAME AND BLOCK NUMBER PLATES SHALL BE COVERED . WITH HIGH INTENSITY REFLECTIVE SHEETING. 3. STANDARD SHALL BE SILVER -WHITE LEGEND ON BLUE BACKGROUND. s o � co N I • C ° O o �- - O W ►- o O z W W in POST 2' SO. POST DETAIL —GROUND DRIP RIVETS LINE N � c0 1 SLEEVE = 2 1/2" SO. iD N ANCHOR 2 1/4` S0. a —DRIVE RIVETS 4. STREET NAME SHALL BE 4 1/2 INCH UPPER CASE SERIES 'C' LETTERS AND NUMBERS AND 3 3/8 INCH LOWER CASE SERIES 'C' LETTERS. BLOCK NUMBER / PRIVATE PLATE SHALL BE 3 INCH UPPER CASE SERIES 'CI LETTERS AND NUMBERS. WHEN THE MESSAGE LENGTH EXCEEDS 42 INCHES AND' CANNOT BE REDUCED TO 41 INCHES. THE MESSAGE SHALL BE DIVIDED INTO TWO SIGNS, ONE OVER THE OTHER. 5. MANUFACTURE OF SIGN TO BE PER LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGH INTENSITYI REFLECTIVE STREET NAME SIGNS. VENDOR SHALL PROVIDE WRITTEN WARRANTY AND WARRANTY NUMBER FROM MANUFACTURER OF REFLECTIVE SHEETING. 6. TYPE A BRACKET - 15 INCHES LONG TO ACCACCOMMODATE BLADE AND 23 INCHES LONG TO ACCOMMODATE 2 BLADES AND BLOCK NUMBER PLATE. TYPE BBRACKET - 1INCHES LONG TO ACCOMMODATE I8 BLADE LONLY. INCHES LONG TO ACCOMMODATE 2BADES 7. TWO FASTENERS (RIVETS) SHALL BE USED TO ATTACH STREET NAME SIGN BLADES OF 24 AND 30 INCH SIGNS TO BRACKET. THREE FASTENERS SHALL BE USED TO ATTACH STREET NAME SIGN BLADES OF 36 INCH AND 42 INCH SIGNS TO BRACKET. 8. THE BLOCK NUMBERING SHALL BE OF EVEN HUNDRED AND IDENTICAL TO THE BLOCK NUMBER OF THE CORRESPONDING CORNER. THE BLOCK NUMBER SHALL BE FOLLOWED BY THE DIRECTIONAL DESIGNATION OF THE STREET. FOR EXAMPLE: 12700N. POST, ANCHOR, SLEEV9 WITH PERFORATIONS ALONGE ETHE ENTIRE LENGTH. ONTO BE 12 GAUGE GANIZED ALL 4STEEL S DES. 10. PERFORATIONS TO BE 7/16 INCH. DIAMETER, I INCH ON CENTER LINE. 11. WHEN INSTALLING IN SOIL. ANCHOR AND SLEEVE SHOULD BE DRIVEN INTO SOIL TOGETHER. LEAVING A PROTRUSION OF I OR 2 INCHES ABOVE GROUND. 12. POST, ANCHOR AND SLEEVE SHALL TELESCOPE FREELY. REFLECTIVE STREET SIGN POST INSTALLATION 42 107 REVISIONS: APPROVED ♦ STANDARD 00 00/00 s CHRIS A. VOGT y° 505 CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 STREET NAME SIGN POST SHEET 1 OF 1 3 0: City Street s -EDGE OF PAVEMENT A ISEE SECTION A —A BELOW A ,4 4 v EDGE OF PAVEMENT "BUTT" JOINT Less than 12" "GREENBOOK" CLASS B—AR-4000 A.C., 3" LIFT, OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL PROPOSED UTILITY SECTION A -A "BUTT" JOINT EXISTING BASE (VARIES IN DEPTH) EXISTING PAVEMENT (VARIES IN DEPTH) "GREENBOOK" CLASS 100—E-100 TRENCH BACKFILL SLURRY, OR CITY APPROVED CONTROLLED DENSITY FILL (CDF) 108 REVISIONS: APPROVED STANDARD 00/00/00 Z u F cfM CHRIS A. VOGT OF 600 CITY ENGINEER TRANSVERSE TRENCH BACKFILL & RCE 44250 PAVING DETAIL # 1 SHEET 1 OF 5 T - 3 \ City Street "GREENBOOK" CLASS B-AR-4000 A.C., OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL, 2 LIFTS, 4" MIN. EDGE OF PAVEMENT A SEE SECTION A -A BELOW A 4 4 EDGE OF PAVEMENT VARIES (36" - 489, "BUTT" JOINT 1� 1' "GREENBOOK BASE MATERIAL, DEPTH VARIES, 4h" MIN. PROPOSED UTILITY - VARIES (12") — 24") SECTION A -A "BUTT" JOINT EXISTING BASE (VARIES IN DEPTH) EXISTING PAVEMENT (VARIES IN DEPTH) TRENCH BACKFILL 431' 109 REVISIONS: APPROVED STANDARD 00/00/00 S CHRIS A. VOGT M O/ 600 CITY ENGINEER TRANSVERSE TRENCH BACKFILL & RCE 44250 PAVING DETAIL #i 2 SHEET 2 OF 5 t 3 City Street EDGE OF PAVEMENT SEE SECTION A -A BELOW A A ;4 s IOf 0.10' DEEP A.C. COLD MILL AND OVERLAY WITH "GREENBOOK" CLASS C2-AR-4000 A.C., OR CITY --------,, APPROVED EQUAL "BUTT" JOINT VARIES 3 GREATER THAN 4 � v EDGE OF PAVEMENT 1• 1' - "GREENBOOK" CLASS B-AR-4000 A.C., OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL, 2 LIFTS, 4" MIN. PROPOSED UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL -� VARIES (GREATER THAN 24") SECTION A -A REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 3' "BUTT" JOINT EXISTING BASE (VARIES IN DEPTH) EXISTING PAVEMENT (VARIES IN DEPTH) "GREENBOOK" BASE MATERIAL, DEPTH VARIES, 436" MIN. cr Z V fC +• t'� TRANSVERSE TRENCH BACKFILL PAVING DETAIL # 3 43el.", iio STANDARD 600 SHEET 3 OF 5 0Y City Street - MEDIAN _�TYE.�_ D LD SEE SECTION A -A BELOW LANE LINE (TYP.) "GREENBOOK" SEALCOAT, OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL VARIES (WIDTH OF PARKING LANE) EXISTING PAVEMENT VARIES IN DEPTH EXISTING BASE VARIES IN DEPTH ; N-41, 1' TRENCH PAVEMENT SECTION PROPOSED UTILITY - TRENCH BACKFILL SECTION EE NOTE BE VARIES SECTION A -A EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER TRENCH BASE SECTION 'NOTE: FOR SPECIFIC TRENCH BACKFILL AND INITIAL PAVING REQUIREMENTS, REFER TO THE TRANSVERSE TRENCH BACKFILL AND PAVING DETAILS, AS APPRO- PRIATE FOR THE TRENCH WIDTH. 4.33 1n REVISIONS: APPROVED VA, q4 STANDARD 00/00/00 s 4 CHRIS A. VOGT 600 CITY ENGINEER LONGZTUDINAL TRENCH BACKFILL RCE 44250 & PAVING DETAIL # 1 IISHEET 4 OF 5 3 City Street MEDIAN (TYP.) D SEE SECTION A -A BELOW 3 � � D LANE LINES (TYP.) 0.10' DEEP A.C. COLD MILL AND OVERLAY WITH "GREENBOOK" CLASS C2-AR-4000 A.C., OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL VARIES "BUTT" JOINT (WIDTH OF TRAVEL LANE, 12' TYP.) "BUTT" JOINT TRENCH PAVEMENT SECTION PROPOSED UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL SECTION *SEE NOTE BEL VARIES SECTION A -A �- EXISTING BASE (VARIES IN DEPTH) EXISTING PAVEMENT (VARIES IN DEPTH) TRENCH BASE SECTION *NOTE: FOR SPECIFIC TRENCH BACKFILL AND INITIAL PAVING REOUIREMENTS, REFER TO THE TRANSVERSE TRENCH BACKFILL AND PAVING DETAILS, AS APPRO- PRIATE FOR THE TRENCH WIDTH. 4311112 REVISIONS: APPROVED, i� =� �� STANDARD 00/00/00 s K CHRIS A. VOGT OF 600 CITY ENGINEER LONGITUDINAL TRENCH BACKFILL RCE 44250 & PAVING DETAIL # 2 SHEET 5 OF 5 • P� TRANSVERSE TRENCHES BACKFILL & RESURFACING REQUIREMENTS *Based on Size of Excavated Trench* 1, Less than 12" in Size (Typically performed by rock saw or other similar methods.) Backfill Requirements: CDF or l -sack slurry backfill ONLY P.Backfill up to 3" below finish surface of street IN, Testing not required Backfill depth independent of street structural section Resurfacing Requirements: No F-saw cut required at trench edges (Provided trench edges are vertical, straight, and stable.) Tack oil coat at edges Paving with 1/4" a.c. material ► In one lift ► Depth of 3", flush with finish surface of street Compaction via powder puff or other mechanical means ► Compaction to 95% ► Testing not required No grinding or capping with '/2" a.c. material required See Transverse Trench Backfill & Paving Detail #1 2. 12" to 24" in Size (Typically performed with backhoe bucket or other similar methods.) Backfill Requirements: CDF or l -sack slurry, backfill (optional) P. No testing required Native or select material backfill ► Compaction via special conditions to 90% ► Backfill depth up to appropriate subgrade elevation ► Testing required iscellaneous Base material backfill Crushed Aggregate or Crushed M ► Compaction to 95% ► Backfill depth up to appropriate base grade elevation (4'/�" minimum) ► Testing required 435 113 Backfill depths dependent upon street structural section REVISIONS: APPROVED ., • STANDARD 00/00/004 � s CHRI S A. voGTRENCHES BACKFI L L 601 CITY ENGINEERTRANSVERSE RCE 44250 1 k prVIRFACING REQ ■ SHEET 1 OF 2 CI 3. • Resurfacing Requirements: F-saw cut required at trench edges Tack oil coat at all saw -cut edges Paving with 1/4" a.c. material ► In at least two lifts ► Depth to 1" thicker than existing a.c. section (4" mininium) Compaction via vibroplate, tamper, or other mechanical means 01 Compaction to 95% 01 Testing required No grinding or capping with ''/2" a.c. material required • See Transverse Trench Backfill & Paving Detail #2 Greater than 24" in Size (Typically performed with backhoe bucket or other similar methods.) • Backfill Requirements: CDF or 1-sack slurry backfill (optional) ► No testing required Native or select material backfill ► Compaction via special conditions to 90% ► Backfill depth up to appropriate subgrade elevation ► Testing required Crushed Aggregate or Crushed Miscellaneous Base material backfill ► Compaction to 95% ► Backfill depth up to appropriate base grade elevation (4'/s" minimum) ► Testing required Backfill depths dependent upon street structural section • Resurfacing Requirements: V-saw cut required at trench edges Tack oil coat at all saw -cut edges Base paving with a.c. material ► In at least two lifts ► Depth to 1" thicker than existing a.c. section (4" minimum) ► Finished surface to 0.10' below saw -cut edge Compaction via vibroplate, tamper, or other mechanical means ► Compaction to 95% ► Testing required 3'-grind beyond I' -saw cut at trench edges P. Depth of grind to 0.10' below existing finish surface of street Finish paving with '/2" a.c. material ► In one lift, via Barber -Green paver or other similar means Compaction via roller ► Compaction to 95% ► Testing not required • See Transverse Trench Backfill & Paving Detail 43 REVISIONS: APPROVED *of, 00 00/00 4 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER TRANSVERSE TRENCHES BACKFI LL RCE 44250 & RESURFACING REQ. 436 114 STANDARD 601 SHEET 2 OF-2 �J • FLAT PLATE WASHER CUT STEEL WASHER 5/8" CARRIAGE BOLT WITH HEX NUT cp 8" X 8" ROUGH D.F. POST (CREOSOTE TREATED) TYPICAL POST SPACING 12'-6" C TO C 4 11L" 12 1/2 2" 29/32" X 1 1/8" SLOTS --k-- NOTES: 1. GUARD RAIL ELEMENT MAY BE EITHER STEEL OR ALUMINUM. 2. STEEL RAIL SHALL BE GALVANIZED PER ASTM DESIGNATION A-123. 3. STEEL RAIL THICKNESS SHALL BE MIN. 12 GAUGE. 4. ALUMINUM RAIL THICKNESS SHALL BE MIN. 0.105 IN.. 27"+/- Q 12 1 /2" LAP r� o 4 1/2" 2" CE POST BOLT SLOT 3/4" X 2 1 /2" -;---- SLOT 5/8" X 1 1/4" BUTTON HEAD OVAL SHOULDER BOLTS WITH 1 1/4" RECESSED HEX NUTS - TOTAL: 8 PER SPLICE AND 4 PER TERMINAL SECTION. RAIL SPLICE le ro 6 1/4' 4 1/4" 2" t i SLOTTED HOLES T SAME AS RAIL ELEMENT SECTION TERMINAL SECTION STD. NO. W31- 30" GALV. METAL CHANNEL U-POST (GALV. 10 GA.) TYPE WRED it LiELEVATION 2'-6" MINIMUM -J END OF RIGHT OF WAY OR. BEGINNING OF BUFFER STRIP. CD z 0 0 REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 CURB & GUTTER �- PAVING VARIABLE - PLAN CURB & GUTTER •.' 437 115 STANDARD 620 BARRZCADS SHEET 1 OF 1 �J C `r. L3.42' -- -----� Y OIW �"Do Q a� u 7� mV cU) o NOTE: MAILBOX LOCATION, FOUNDATION ANCHOR BOLTS, AND BOLT HOLES SHALL CONFORM TO SPECIFICATIONS FURNISHED BY THE POSTMASTER. REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 a $ s4 fAr Of CHRIS A. _VOGT I - CITY ENGINEER MULTIPLE MAILBOX INSTALLATION RCE 44250 FOR NEW SIDEWALK 438 116 STANDARD 630 SHEET 1 OF 1 I I LL D' SEWALK w o Qim w m D C� z Q > co co 1— MULTIPLE MAILBOX TO BE FURNISHED BY U. S. 1' POSTAL SERVICE TYP r 4" THICK CONCRETE SLAB t-ic111 •'.. III I '•• I I II FOUNDATION I I R. I • ANCHOR BOLTS • VARIAB�. . • • 1/2' EXPANSION JOINT PER STD. NO. 208. Y co �I OC O� I m 0 Q z° a � U� vW ci y NOTE: MAILBOX LOCATION, FOUNDATION ANCHOR BOLTS, AND BOLT HOLES SHALL CONFORM TO SPECIFICA- TIONS FURNISHED BY THE POSTMASTER. MAILBOX FOUNDATION AND SLAB TO BE A MONOLITHIC POUR. 439 117 REVISIONS: APPROVED ® 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 40 a STANDARD 631 MULTIPLE MAILBOX INSTALLATIO FOR EXISTING SIDEWALK SHEET 1 OF 1 • -fV . I. vv %v. .. - - -- --/ CORPORATION STOP WATER MAIN NOTE. 0 ALL LOT PRIOR TO PAVING OF STREET, INCLUDING FIRE z SPRINKLER PREVENTION SERVICE. 0 ai 0 REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 PRECAST CONCRETE . .. FLEXIBLE PIPE, MATERIAL PER WATER DISTRICT OR AGENCY SPECS. j cu T YPI CAL WATER METE INSTALLATION 440 11s STANDARD 635 SHEET 1 OF 1 • • FIRE HYDRANT NOTE. 1. FIRE HYDRANT SHALL BE PLACED: a.) 7 -6 BEHIND THE FL WHEN THE WIDTH OF SIDEWALK IS 6' FROM FL. b.) 7 -6 BEHIND THE FL WHEN THERE IS NO SIDEWALK OR AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 2. FIRE HYDRANT SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHIN THE CORNER CUT BACK AT ANY TIME. AS SHOWN ON IMPROVEMENT PLAN. CL OF WATER MAIN VALVE BOX, FRAME, i AND COVER PER STD. PAVEMENT--i 18"X18"X18" CONCRETE ANCHOR BLOCK 0 Z NOTE: 1. FIRE HYDRANT TO BE AS APPROVED BY SERVING AGENCY co. 0 I= REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 I CC Dr%M11vn a, Ycu s 4 Of FIRE HYDRANT I NSTAL LAT ION 441. 119 STANDARD 6ou SHEET 1 OF 1 • 0 i 3/8" RADIUS NOTCH A 1/2 PLAI OF COVE 11 112" 10" 1 /8"— 5 3/4" 1 /8"-►I — A 1 /2 PLAN yF FRAME N- - ---- FRAME N - - - --- =I - � 51 FRAME �— 5 1 /2'' - 7 3/4" BP I 9 3/4" SECTION "A -A" PAVEMENT z REVISIONS: 6" PIPE OF PROPER LENGTH TO SERVE AS VALVE BOX APPROVED a 00/00/00 j CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 4425425 VALVE BOX.9 FRAME AND COVER 442. 120 STANDARD 637 SHEET 1 OF 1 • 1�1 11 - - STREET CENTERLINE - - 48' MIN. 50' MIN. ►- A i—FP 48' MIN. -FL�- -- w BUS STOP SI N �" " "H - -' a aC = J - 3 N Z a US STOP BUS STOP o: is ? A SHELTER SIGN Q z �- z N cn O co 1= 12' TURNOUT 14' ADDITIONAL R/W a 6" OR 8" 7.5' 8' 6' ' CURB FACE SIDEWALK MIN. I a 2 CURB DATA -.�_°W 2.% 2% .; ..: Y`'• Y ' R = 50' 280 21' 27" Y�;�Y�.�tt: f.• � Yi.• Y!. 611 L = 24.75' 0.15' CURB FACE T = 12.63' o �; F.S. �. �� CEMENT TREATED BASE �i PCC SECTION A -A NOTES: 1. THICKNESS OF PCC AND BASE DEPENDS UPON ADT VOLUME AND SOIL TYPE. STRUCTURAL SECTION CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. 2. LOCATION OF BUS TURNOUT SHOULD BE AS APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, AND IN CONSULTATION WITH THE APPROPRIATE TRANSIT AGENCY. (FAR SIDE IS PREFERRED LOCATION). i co i o -- 0* �• c NEAR SIDE FAR SIDE o REVISIONS: APPROVED as 00/00/00 �'�• CHRIS A. VOGT Of CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 BUS TURNOUT Q�rw 443 121 STANDARD 650 SHEET 1 OF 1 JUST BELOW HEAD OF TREE WIRE AND HOSE TIE (TWO REQUIRED) LOOP HOSES 1" GREATER THAN DIAMETER 6n_8n PREVAILING 0 CD#12 BWG. ZINC COATED WIRE TREE WIND PLAN VIEW � LFINISHED GRADE a 74y� TREE STAKE N 1 ELEVATION TWIST WIRES TOGETHER BEND DOWN WIRE APOLEFINE WIRE DETAIL NOTE 1. EACH WIRE SHALL BE WRAPPED TIGHTLY AROUND AND THROUGH LODGE POLE (IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS) PRIOR TO BEING TWISTED TOGETHER. BEND TWISTED WIRE DOWNWARD. 0 2. TREE STAKES: CASE 1 1--1/2" DIAMETER, SCHEDULE 40, GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE STAKE CASE 2: 21t DIAMETER LODGE POLE PINE TREATED WITH COPPER NANTHWTE 6 z c F- Q 3 a a REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 SINGLE _STAKING y M , j S cu Of 4 TREE -STAKING 444 122 STANDARD 700 SHEET 1 OF 3 • 0 • DRILL HOLE (TYPICAL) 2" DIAMETEF POLE PINE (TWO REQUIF FINISHED GF ELEVATION ) HOSE T I E .OW HEAD OF TREE TWIST WIRES TOGETHER LOOP HOSES 1" GREATER BEND DOWN THAN DIAMETER WIRE LODGE POLE WIRE #12 BWG. ZINC COATED WIRE TREE PI14E STAKE DETAIL PLAN VIEW NOTES: 0 06 1. EACH WIRE SHALL BE WRAPPED TIGHTLY AROUND AND THROUGH LODGE POLE (IN OPPOSITE U DIRECTIONS) PRIOR TO BEING TWISTED TOGETHER. BEND TWISTED WIRE DOWNWARD. 2. STAKES SHALL HAVE UNIFORM DIAMETER, AND BE TREATED WITH COPPER NANTHANATE. 0 z 0 a 3 a Q REVISIONS: DOUBLE STAKING APPROVED. 00/00/00 y CHRIS A. VOGT Of -4 CITY ENGINEER TREE - STAKING RCE 44250 aiH1w 445 123 STANDARD 700 SHEET 2 OF 3 • �J TRUNK GUYS WIRE SIZES (TYP.) 24% 36" BOX 1 STRAND 112 BWG. ZINC COATED WIRE (SAME AS USED 36% 48" BOX 2 STRAND # 12 FOR GUYS) BWG. ZINC COATED OVER 48" 3 STRAND # 12 BWG. ZINC COATED LOOP HOSES 1" GREATER THAN DIAMETER MULTIPLE STRANDS SHALL BE TWISTED TOGETHER WIRE AND HOSE TIES — GUYS WIRES 41IX4"X2'-6" REDWOOD DEADMEN (TYP.) COMPACTED BACKFI (TYP.) �--- TRENCH DEADMAN TWIST WIRE La ��•---- TRENCH 0 Z EXCAVATION LINE o PLAN co DEADMAN a 3 a Q REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 ELEVATION YTYING PLAN INSTALL WIRE TIES BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL GUYS PRIOR TO TENSIONING GUYS. — 1/2" DIA. WHITE POLYETHYLENE PLASTIC TUBE 5' LONG. -- 3-5" GALVANIZED TURNBUCKLES FINISHED GRADE 1200 450 DEADMAN WIRE PLAN DEADMAN PLACEMENT TREE GUYING 446 124 TREE - STAKING STANDARD 700 SHEET 3 OF 3 3'-0" J I 4'-2" I �-- 4" DIA. PIPE 4" DIA. PIPE --� - I �._-_ __ — _ - _ 3" DEEP I PREMOLDED FILLER 16" DIA. HOLE � 16' DIA. HOLE � JOINT I I CENTERED I I CENTERED I A �— I I Ln �� m - I I =I I 1, _3., I Q L5 4" DIA. PIPE 1:2" (TYP) ; V-3"112 3" DEEP PREMOLDED JOINTIFILLER. THICKNESS AS REQUIREDIFOR /4'-l"X TIGHT FIT. (4 SIDES) (-.._1" 4" DIA. PIPE 1/2" X 3" THICK, NATURAL COLOR �J COVER �, , J (TYP) Z2'-1" PERMEABLE CONCRETE TREE WELL 1/2" DIMENSIONS 0 1/4" X 5'-6" X 3" THICK, NATURAL COLOR CASE PERMEABLE CONCRETE TREE WELL COVER DIMENSIONS 0 1/4" CASE 2 r 1 r In 0 Z 0 Q 3 a Q REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 1-1 2" TREE WELL COVER i 3" LAYER OF NO. 4 AGGREGATE _ o Z 4" DIA. PIPE I. FILLED WITH NO. 4 CONCRETE AGGREGATE (TYPICAL) , ` . L PREMOLDED JOINT FILLER LTOP OF CONCRETE AGGREGATE SECTION O TYPE 1 NOTE: SEE SHEET 4 FOR NOTES PERTAINING TO THIS SHEET 447 125 a ♦ STANDARD f 705 TREE WELL SHEET 1 OF 6 • �J Q 3 a Q �l Tl\zr4,_2„ z cr r, A Lf �I I I - --_ I IV 4" DIA. PIPE 1/2'_'��--I 11_3I I ` ENTER ROW OF I !rt » BRICKS ON EDGE 3" DEEP PREMOLDED JOINTLEI . I FILLER. THICKNESS AS ! IT I 6" PREMOLDED JOINT REQUIRED FOR A TIGHT FIT.7 Ilg/16" 9/16"j FILLER THICKNESS AS (4 SIDES) 0' CASE 2 REQUIRED FOR TIGHT FIT. (4 SIDES) MANHOLE BRICK 2-1/2" X 3-7/8" X 8-1/4" LAID TIGHT WITHOUT MORTAR CASE 1 TOP OF CONCRETE AGGREGATE '_211 PREMOLDED JOINT FILLER I ( T Y P. 3-5/8" -==P 74-A� r- - - - - - - REDWOOD HEADER 2-6d NAILS I I I a PER JOINT ' I 2-6" RWD. - - I HEADER I.:r N ' ' • - cti c Z I I I 3" LAYER OF NO. 4 I I I AGGREGATE I I . I 11/16" (TYP.) I lrl 1 Z//HOLLOW CONCRETE BLOCKS 4" DIA. PIPE 5-5/8" X 3-5/8" X 7-5/8" AND 5-5/8" X 7-5/8" X 7-5/8" LAID TIGHT WITHOUT MORTAR CASE 3 NOTE: SEE SHEET 4 FOR NOTES PERTAINING TO THIS SHEET. TYPE 2 REVISIONS: APPROVED CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 4" PIPE FILLED WITH NO. 4 AGGREGATE SECTION OA a , o`c4j > �\ • � s f_ TREE WELL 448 12s STANDARD 705 SHEET 2 OF 6 • i� '1 l R/W �r 1 I B 6" 1 WEAKENED -PLANE JOINT PARKWAYS LESS THAN 8' 1 COVER REOUIRED _ CASE I: 1'6" X 3' TREE WELL CASE II: 2' X 4' TREE WELL TREE WELLS C \ D 311 POROUS, PERMEABLE P.C.C. r— REINFORCED WITH 21/4" X 21/4" 16 GAUGE WIRE MESH (SEE NOTE 6) Po_ TREE WELL COVER B WEAKENED -PLANE JOINTS PARKWAYS 8' OR GREATER 2 COVERS REQUIRED CASE III: 3' X 3' TREE WELL CASE IV: 4' X 4' TREE WELL CASE A B C D R 1 3'-0" 1'-6" T-11" 1'-5'h" 9- II 4'-0" 2'-0" 3'-11" 1'-11'h" 15" III 3' 0" 3%0" T-11" 1'-5'h" 9" IV 4'-0" 4'-0" 3'-11" 1'-11'fi" 15" DIRT TO BE FLUSH WITH ADJACENT ��- WALK TYPICAL SECTIONS NOTES: 1. TREE WELLS SHALL BE SPACED AS DIRECTED OR INDICATED ON THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 2. LOCATION OF TREE WELLS WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONDITIONS: A. 50' FROM THE BCR ON THE APPROACH TO AN INTERSECTION. B. 15' FROM THE ECR ON THE EXIT FROM AN INTERSECTION. C. 20' FROM LIGHT STANDARDS. D. 10' FROM FIRE HYDRANTS. E. 10' FROM DRIVEWAYS. 3. COVERS ARE TO BE COLORED BUFF USING AN ACCEPTABLE COLORING AGENT. 4. TREE WELLS ARE TO BE BACKFILLED WITH CLEAN DIRT AND FLUSH WITH ADJACENT WALK UNTIL TREES ARE PLANTED. 5. PARKWAYS LESS THAN 8': CASE I - UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. CASE II - USE WHERE THERE'S AN EXISTING FENCE OR WALL AT THE PL. PARKWAYS 8' OR GREATER: CASE III - UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. CASE IV - MAY BE SPECIFIED WITH WALKS 7' OR GREATER. 6. FOR MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS, SEE NOTE 1 FOR TYPE 1 TREE WELL ON SHEET 4. ff ONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 TYPE 3 449 127 #.,-- STANDARD 705 TREE . WEL L SHEET 3 OF 6 NOTES FOR TYPE 1 TREE WELL 1. THE COVER SHALL BE MADE OF PERMEABLE CONCRETE WITH A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 1200 PSI AND SHALL BE CAST -IN -PLACE OR PRECAST "AGRIPERM" OR EQUIVALENT. CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE SHALL CONSIST OF ONE PART CEMENT TO FOUR PARTS 3/8" GRAVEL AND APPROXIM/%TELY FOUR GALLONS OF WATER PER SACK OF CEMENT. THE GRAVEL SHALL BE CLEAN WITH FINES REMOVED. THE CONCRETE MIXTURE SHALL BE DEPOSITED -AS NEAR AS POSSIBLE TO ITS FINAL LOCATION.THE EXCESS CONCRETE SHALL BE RODDED OFF IN A SAWING MOTION. A SURPLUS OF CONCRETE SHOULD BE MAINTAINED AGAINST THE FRONT SURFACE OF THE SCREED IN ORDER THAT LOW' AREAS WILL BE FILLED AS THE SCREED PASSES OVER. RODDING SHALL BE HELD TO A MINIMUM. AFTER THE SURFACE IS FLAT NO OTHER FINISHING WILL BE REQUIRED. CURING COMPOUND TO WHICH WATER PROOFING MATERIALS HAVE BEEN ADDED WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 2. EXISTING. SIDEWALK SHALL BE CAREFULLY SAWCUT PREPARATORY TO INSTALLATION OF TREE WELL COVERS. SAWCUT OVER -RUNS SHALL BE CLEANED AND FILLED WITH EPDXY APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AND FINISHED TO SIDEWALK GRADE. 3. THE PIPE MAY BE CIP, ACP, VCP, ABS, PVC, GALV. STL. OR ASPHALT IMPREGNATED FIBER DUCT AND IT MAY BE BELL OR PLAIN END. 4. AFTER ALL OTHER WORK PERTINENT TO PLANTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED, EACH TREE SHALL BE WATERED IMMEDIATELY WITH A MINIMUM OF 20 GALLONS OF WATER, AND REPEATED 2 TIMES IN THE NEXT 3 DAYS. AFTER THE TREE HAS BEEN WATERED AND THE SOIL IS SUFFICIENTLY DRY. THE SOIL SHALL BE GRADED AND TAMPED. THE 3-INCH LAYER OF AGGREGATE SHALL BE PLACED AND GRADED TO ACCEPT THE TREE WELL COVER FIRMLY, WITHOUT ROCKING, AND FLUSH WITH THE TOP SURFACE OF THE SIDEWALK. THE PREMOLDED JOINT FILLER SHALL BE CAREFULLY PLACED TO INSURE A TIGHT FIT WITH THE TOP OF THE JOINT FILLER FLUSH WITH THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK. 5. IF CAST -IN -PLACE, THERE SHALL BE A 3 MIL PLASTIC LINER BETWEEN WALK AND AGGREGATE. NOTES FOR TYPE 2 TREE WELL 1. EXISTING SIDEWALK SHALL BE CAREFULLY SAWCUT PREPARATORY TO LAYING OF' CONCRETE BLOCKS OR BRICK. SAWCUT OVER -RUNS SHALL BE CLEANED AND FILLED WITH EPDXY APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AND FINISHED TO SIDEWALK GRADE. 2. THE PIPE MAY BE CIP, ACP, VCP, ABS, PVC, GALV. STL. OR ASPHALT IMPREGNATED FIBER DUCT, AND IT MAY BE BELL OP PLAIN END. *- 3. NAILS SHALL BE GALVANIZED STEEL BOX. o� n 4. AFTER ALL OTHER: WORK PERTINENT TO PLANTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED, EACH TREE c SHALL BE WATERED IMMEDIATELY WITH A MINIMUM OF 20 GALLONS OF WATER AND z REPEATED 2 TIMES IN THE NEXT 3 DAYS. AFTER THE WATER HAS SETTLED AND THE SOIL IS SUFFICIENTLY DRY, THE SOIL SHALL BE GRADED AND TAMPED. A 3-INCH N LAYER OF AGGREGATE SHALL BE PLACED AND GRADED TO ACCEPT BRICKS FLUSH WITH THE TOP SURFACE OF THE SIDEWALK. THE PREMOLDED JOINT FILLER AND HEADERS a SHALL BE CAREFULLY PLACED TO INSURE A TIGHT FIT WITH THE TOP OF THE JOINT 3 FILLER FLUSH WITH THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK. 128 a -n Q REVISIONS: APPROVED STANDARD 00/00/00 � � s CHRIS A. VOGT 705 CITY ENGINEER TREE WELL RCE 44250 SHEET 4 OF 6 SEE FRAME DETAIL ON SHEET NO. 6 r • PLAN GRATING FLUSH WITHSIDEWALK CURB .r•��1`;rs N � /r///�j cD ISOMETRIC VIEW � so" GRATE PLAN 314"6 'duo ',N • 60" SECTION GJ 1" DEEP SAWCUT IN EXISTING SIDEWALKcli c I N0 4 BAR (TYP) - 1• n � •16• ; 3" LAYER OF -I� 6-12" ' = NO. 4 AGGREGATE 4• PIPE FILLED •�•• WITH NO. 4 •:•• AGGREGATE — SECTION O N0_ 1. GRATE MATERIAL TO BE CAST IRON. 2, GRATE PATTERN AS SPECIFIED ON PROJECT PLANS AND/OR IN SPECIFICATIONS. 3. EXISTING WCUT OVER -RUNS CLEANED LY SAWCUT PREPARATORY SA ANDFIL EDWITHEPDXY APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AND FINISHED TO SIDEWALK GRADE. 4. THE PIPE MAY BE CIP. ACP, VCP, ABS, PVC, GALV. STL. OR ASPHALT IMPREGNATED r FIBER DUCT, AND IT MAY BE BELL OR PLAIN END. ' 5. AFTER ALL OTHER WORK PERTINENT TO PLANTING HAS BEEN COMPLETED, EACH TREE SHALL rn r BE WATERED IMMEDIATELY WITH A MINIMUM OF 20 GALLON OF WATER AND REPEATED TIMES IN THE NEXT 3 DAYS. AFTER THE WATER HAS SETTLED AND THE SOIL IS c SUFFICIENTLY DRY, THE SOIL SHALL BE GRADED AND TAMPED AND 3-INCH LAYER OF z CONCRETE AGGREGATE SHALL BE PLACED AND GRADED. C H co a 3 a REVISIONS: APPROVED ® 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 TYPE 4 V ST44 9 f' r fM Of 44 TREE WELL 4,51 129 STANDARD 705 SHEET 5 OF 6 • • 1 3/ 4' x 1 3 /4' x 1/ 4" 4- 112 x 3" STUD ANCHORS STEEL ANGLE FRAME 1 3/4" �CUR6� r T to O 1 Q 3 a Q REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 yp m BOTTOMANDOUTSIDE FACES r N ONLY (TYP) _ N N r O m m r -- A 7/ 16' DIA - 2 PLACES u i 54 3/4 1 1/2"x2 1/2'xl/4' ANGLE a . 7/ 16"x3/4' SLOT HOLES N o 20 1 /4" 20 114" 20 11A' a 60 3/4' S8 3/4' N FRAME DETAIL 4- 23 15/ 16" 6 7/8' 23 15/ 16" ' a 1" co SECTION SEE NOTE 1 54 3/4" \ 7/16" DIA. SECTION OA SEE NOTE 1 1 314' 1/4'x2' FLAT BAR 3/4"x4 1/2'x1/8'x2 C-SPACERS NOTES: 1. SECTION A AND B REQUIRED ONLY WHEN TREE GUARD IS REQUIRED. 2. ALL METAL PARTS AND FRAME FABRICATION.OM TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE HOT DIP GALVANIZED AFTER CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 of � � Z 5 s sy OF TYPE 4 130 STANDARD 705 TREE WELL SHEET 6 OF 6 C A EXISTING SLOPE - 2 : 1 OR FLATTER ONLY' ROOT BALL - DO NOT COMPACT ROOT BALL SOIL. ALLOW ROOT BALL TO SETTLE TO FINISHED GRADE. --7 FINISHED GRADE FREE OR WATERING BASIN SHRUB TRUNK 1 1/2 1 MULCH MAX COMPACT SOIL TO FORM BASIN FOR SLOPE P LANT I NG PREPARED'' L-----------r ' ';w: SOIL MIX ;, •'` ; : :: O O N N O Z O y a 3 a Q REVISIONS: APPROVED r 00/00/00 j S CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER SHRUB AND TREE PLANTING RCE 44250 __1 1/2 : 1 MAX. S UBG RADE"'--- 453 131 STANDARD 710 SHEET 1 OF 1 • • • 46" DIA.(MIN) 38" DIA. (MIN) 4• 30"DIA. (MIN) (TYP.) TREE 22" DIA.(MIN) 4" TREE (TYP-) • 0 I /o I _ a &A - RAISED RIBS �— ROOT BALL-------- r. (SEE NOTE 2) RIBS PREPARED SOIL MIX L� RAISED • (SEE NOTE 2) ROOT BARRIER .I; No. 3 CONCRETE AGGREGATE OR 1' CRUSHED ROCK TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TOP OF TREE WELL COVER A LAYER OF No. 3 CONCRETE AGGREGATE OR GRATING (SEE NOTE 1) OR 1' CRUSHED ROCK w0 it G >Z I d c N 1`9 �40.�VOF7l� 0 ROOT BARRIER (SEE NOTE 2) PREPARED SOIL MIX (SEE NOTE 3B) ROOT BALL No. 3 CONCRETE AGGREGATE OR 1" CRUSHED ROCK (SEE NOTE 3A) COMPACTED, PREPARED SOIL MIX TO BOTTOM OF ROOT BALL (SEE NOTE 36) JETTED PREPARED SOIL MIX BACKFILL (SEE NOTE 3A) I � TYPE 1 30" DIA. (MIN.) r' " 46DU1. (MIN.) • + I TYPE 2 SECTION ® NOTE: � �' I '• FINISHED SURFACE WHEN I 'A ' I TREE WELL COVER OR GRATING • ; ``'� ;;�,_ I• IS NOT USED SHALL BE AS i\ \ •• SHOWN AT RIGHT. FS c NOTES: N N LO 1. SEE PROJECT PLANS FOR TYPE OF TREE WELL COVER OR TREE GUARD AND GRATING TO BE USED. 61 2. ROOT BARRIER SHALL BE FABRICATED FROM A HIGH DENSITY AND HIGH IMPACT PLASTIC SUCH AS POLYVINYL CHLORIDE. z ABS OR POLYETHYLENE AND HAVE A MINIMUM THICKNESS 0.06 INCH. THE PLASTIC SHALL HAVE 112-314 INCH HIGH RAISED VERTICAL RIBS ON THE INNER SURFACE SPACED NOT MORE THAN 6-8 INCHES APART. I- 3. PLANTING SHALL CONFORM TO SUBSECTION 308-4 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, EXCEPT THAT: A. THE LOWER 10 INCHES OF THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH PREPARED SOIL MIX AND JETTED PRIOR T Q PLACING THE ROOT BARRIER AND THE NO.3 CONCRETE AGGREGATE. OR 1" CRUSHED ROCK. • B. PREPARED SOIL MIX SHALL BE PLACED IN THE PLANTING HOLE AND COMPACTED TO BOTTOM OF ROOT BALL ELEVATION 3 PRIOR TO PRECEEDING WITH TREE PLANTING. a 454 Q REVISIONS: APPROVED �� 00/00/ 0 �` sTit, 4 -4a CHRIS A. VOGT Of CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 TREE ROOT BARRIER 132 STANDARD 711 SHEET 1 OF 1 • C7 3" FOR 36" LONG BOXES AND 83/4" x 141/a" LOCKING CAST ?" FOR SHORTER BOXES IRON LID EMBOSSED "PRV" NO. 6 GAUGE (HARD CONTINUOUS WELDED IiEINFORCED CONCRETE COVER WITH SURFACE) WIRE LOOP CENTERED CAST IRON LID GALVANIZED STEEL - NO. 9 GAUGE GI DOUBLE TOGGLE LOCK CONTINUOUS WELDED WIRE REINFORCE CONCRETE VALVE i� r LOOP ■ BOX LOCKING GALVANIZED MALLEABLE CONCRETE COVER IRON UNION WITH BRASS OR COPPER SEATS. TYPICAL ' I FLOW + 'I Y 3' MIN, TYP. v Cs Q 9 L PRESSURE REGULATOR �U a v BRASS o NIPPLE N _0 Y-STRAINER ohm Z7 Yl. CRUSHED ROCK MAIN LINE SUMP 83/.• x IVA* LOCKING CAST I IRON LID EMBOSSED "PRV' •ac.w GALVANIED STEEL DOUBLE TOGGLE LOCK COVER FOR BOXES 17-1/4" LONG ELEVATION TOP OF BOX TO BE 1" ABOVE GRADE FOR GROUND COVER AREA AND 1/2" FOR LAWN AREA FINISHED Ij GRADE7 3" TYPICAL ALL SIDES '0 v tt D d •L ' D r> MAIN LINE NOTES: O 1. PRESSURE REGULATOR AND Y-STRAINER SHALL BE OF BRONZE AND/OR BRASS CONSTRUCTION. N2. PRESSURE SETTING SHALL BE SET AS SPECIFIED. I4 3. Y-STRAINER SHALL BE FITTED WITH A 30.MESH SCREEN OF STAINLESS STEEL OR MONEL, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED AND SHALL BE FITTED WITH A BLOW -OFF COCK. C 4. VALVE BOX SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO ACCOMMODATE ENTIRE Y-STRAINER AND PRESSURE Z REGULATOR ASSEMBLY. 5. Y-STRAINER AND PRESSURE COCK, ADJUSTMENTBNUT INSTALLED MAAIN CAP ON PRESSUREHORIZONTAL REGULATOR � THAT Y-STRAINER BLOW -OFF y ARE ACCESSIBLE. 6. ALL FITTINGS, EXCEPT AS NOTED, SHALL BE THREADED, SCHEDULE 80. PVC. Q 7. AREA AROUND BOX CAN EITHER BE PLANTED, HARD -SURFACE OR COMBINATION. 3 8. CRUSHED ROCK SHALL COVER VALVE BOX PIPE OPENING TO PREVENT SOIL ENTRY. 133 a 9. CLOSE NIPPLES SHALL NOT BE USED. 4 5 55 Q REVISIONS: APPROVED a de STANDARD 00/00/00 C H R I S A. VOGT f of o, 750 CITY ENGINEER URE REGULAR INSTALLATION RCE 44250 PRESS SHEET 1 OF 1 • • c 0 c.� o� L&T III L&T �11 / II R/W LINE i IXO(, TYPE "A" OR "B" ° Lti-w-- FACE OF CURB MONUMENTS lYP FACE OF CURB-,,,,, ;i •b SEWER MANHOLE 11 II ' ----- ----- R/W L&T L&T ( � � I MONUMENTING STREET CENTERLINES WHEN SEWERS ARE LOCATED ON CENTERLINE 614 I STANDARD "A" OR "B" STANDARD "A" OR "B" MONUM ENTS IN PAVEMENT I MONUMENTS IN PAVEMENT � PROPERTY_ LINE All `S�Pa•'- • ••�gilc TIE TO STD. "D" MONUMENT O , i • F IF STREETS ARE NOT PAVED PROPERTY LINE STANDARD "A" OR "B" I � STANDARD "A" OR "B" MONUMENTS IN PAVEMENT I MONUMENTS IN PAVEMENT MONUMENTING STREET CENTERLINES WHERE CURBS ARE NOT REQUIRED NOTES: 1. L & T AS SHOWN HEREON INDICATES LEAD AND TACK OR STEEL PIN MONUMENT SET IN CURB. 2. LEAD AND TAG OR STEEL PIN MONUMENT WITNESS TO PROPERTY CORNER MAY BE SET, NOT REQUIRED. 3. SEE MONUMENT SPECS 21 FOR TYPE "A, C, D, & E" MONUMENT DESCRIPTION AND STD. 903 FOR TYPE "B" MONUMENT DRAWING. SEE SPECS 21.07 FOR MONUMENT SCHEDULE. 134 REVISIONS: APPROVED 4v STANDARD 00/00/00 s �` g �V CHRIS A. VOGT R"O' 800 CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 TIE OUT STANDARDSSHEET 1 OF 1 q I ' i L&T PROPERTY LINE , , OF STREET ------------------ , 1 CURB �"" TYPE "E" MONUMENT (OPTIONAL) LOT LINE L. & T _ TYPE "A" OR "B" MONUMENT r " , TYPE "E" MONUMENT ; - - _ - - " \TYPE "E" MONUMENT (OPTIONAL) - - - - - --�� ; Z (OPTIONAL) w J i J L&T ; L&T O J I � MONUMENTING STREET INTERSECTIONS WHERE CURB AND GUTTERS ARE INSTALLED ��Al, OR 11B�� TYPE � � (MONUMENT) i L L&T &T RADIAL LINE __E.C__�_ -'-------- NOTES: ' DIST DIST 1. L & T SHOWN HEREON INDICATES LEAD AND TACK OR STEEL PIN MONUMENT SET IN ICONCRETE CURB. �O 1 S TYPE "E" MONUMENT TYPE "Ell i MONUMNT (OPTIONAL) ♦ (OPTIONAL) / 2 •• Z L & T o,•` , "All �� TYPE A OR B (MONUMENT) �� MONUMENTING L & T BEGINNING AND :. • ENDING OF CURVE. 2. LEAD AND TAG OR STEEL PIN MONUMENT WITNESS TO PROPERTY CORNER MAY BE SET, ("E" MONUMENT), IN LIEU OF SETTING FRONT LOT CORNERS. 3. THE P.I. OF THE CURVE CENTERLINE OF A STREET MAY BE MONUMENTED IN LIEU OF E.C. & B.C. IF THE P.I. FALLS WITHIN THE TRAVELED WAY. IT SHALL BE REFERENCED WITH L & Ts IN CURB. 4. SEE MONUMENT SPECS 21 FOR TYPE "A, C, D, & E MONUMENT DESCRIPTION AND STD. 802 FOR TYPE "B" MONUMENT DRAWING. SEE SPECS 21.07 FOR MONUMENT SCHEDULE. REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 E - � CHRIS A. VOGT of CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250STREET CENTERLINE MONUMENT a7 457 135 STANDARD D_ 801 SHEET 1 OF 1 El TOP OF PAVING c� 0 w 0 z 0 H 0 U Q REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT. CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 7l8' CD STAMPED: R.E. OR L.S. NUMBER I III � III I I I I I II II I I Ijf---11--j j 1 1 /2"111 T 1 I I II II I I II II I II II I I I I BRASS OR BRONZE HEAD II II I 1 PERMANENT COMPRESSION FIT I I COPPER COVERING I I I I I 1 5/8" 1 7- MOLTEN WELDING JOINT I � I I I I I -- j•--- STEEL CORE i � I I I I I I I � I I i I I I i I a C;k , j 9 I ty Of~'� s 136 STANDARD TYPE "B" MONUMENT SHEET 1 OF 1 • 71 REVISIONS: APPROVED 00/00/00 CHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 0.25" TOP AND BOTTOM MARGIN DRAWING AREA 7.25" x 9.0" 0.85" LEFT MARGIN 0.40" RIGHT MARGIN O ® O 0 8 O 7.25' x 0.20' box with 0.0E1' fall lettering—Romand.shx O1.45' x 0.35' box with 0.09' fall lettering—Monce.b d (solid characters) O1.45' x 0.95' box with 0.11' fall lettering—Monos.txt (solid characters) ® 4.35' x 0.75' box with custom lettering provided by MY O4.35' x 0.55' box with 0.17' tall lettering—Monoebi.lxt (solid characters) © 1.45' x 0.35' box with 0.11' fall lettering—Monos.b d (solid characters) �] 1.45' x 0.65' box with 0.23' tall lettering—Monos.txt (solid characters) ® 1.45' x 0.30' box with 0.11' fall leffering—Monos.hd (solid ohorooian) S TANDARD DRAWING TITLE BLOCK DETAIL. S 4,519 137 STANDARD 990. SHEET 1 OF 1 E T a itT 4 ,('�Qui�ru, AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Consideration of Official Name PUBLIC HEARING: for Village Events RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None for this action. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the July 17, 2001 City Council meeting, the City entered into a Contract Services Agreement with Kiner/Goodsell to produce six events on Calle Estado in the Village area of the City on the first Friday night of the months of November 2001 through April 2002. This event had been offered by the Chamber of Commerce under the title of "Mainstreet Marketplace" in the past. Kiner/Goodsell has recommended that the name be changed to reflect the Village location of the City. Staff is requesting Council consideration of a permanent name for the events. Once an official name has been selected for the event, advertising media can be produced. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Select an official name for the events to be held on Calle Estado the first Friday of the months of November 2001 through April 2002; or 4S1 2. Do not select an official name for the events to be held on Calle Estado the first Friday of the months of November 2001 through April 2002; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submittid, Dodie Horvitz, Commur4 Services Director Approved for submission by: wt-'� .---- Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager S:\Community Services\CCReports\CCS.150. Village Events Name.wpd COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: ITEM TITLE: Consideration of the Point Happy Art Feature RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: 9- August 21, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: The Cultural Arts Commission has recommended that the Point Happy artwork project receive an allocation up to $100,000 from the Art in Public Places fund, account #701-000-255-210 which has a balance of $261,749 as of July 30, 2001. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The developers of the Point Happy Center on the northwest corner of Washington Street and Hwy. 1 1 1 would like to include an Art in Public Places piece in the center of the development. Attachment 1 provides a site plan of the development. Towards the middle of the development, marked with arrows is the location of the proposed art piece. The art piece consists of a group of four Native American women surrounded by a fountain, as provided in Attachment 2. The Cultural Arts Commission reviewed the proposed art feature at their June 14 and July 26 Commission meetings. The Cultural Arts Commission felt as though the round fountain as proposed in Attachment 2 did not provide an attractive art feature in the proposed location. The consultant was asked to have the artists provide a variation of the fountain. Attachment 3 depicts the modification to the art work. The art piece that is being proposed consists of the Native American women sculpture set upon a platform, surrounded by a water fountain. The sculpture is located on the north end of the fountain with the water flowing south to the end of the fountain. Section A, located at the bottom of Attachment 3 provides a cross view of the fountain with the art piece. 463 After the second review of the artwork, the Commission is recommending the City Council consider funding the Point Happy art feature in an amount not to exceed $100,000. Attachment 4 is the proposed budget as submitted by the consultant for the project, Ms. Valerie Miller. Attachment 5 provides background and previous work of the artist being proposed by the consultant for this project. The artist, Felicia will produce the bronze Native American women sculpture. The fountain area will be designed and produced by John Kreig. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Authorize the expenditure of Art in Public Places funds in the amount of $94,950 for the Point Happy Art Feature; or 2. Authorize the expenditure of Art in Public Places funds in a different amount for the Point Happy Art Feature; or 3. Do not authorize the expenditure of Art in Public Places funds for the Point Happy Art Feature; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Res 4ectfullbmitted, odimunity Services Director Approved for submission by: homas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Point Happy Site Plan 2. Native American Women Sculpture 3. Water Feature Plan 4. Proposed Point Happy Art Feature Budget 464 5. Artist Background Information S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.149.Point Happy Art Piece.wpd " I a fY6Al�lf W IM[iY-�1 ♦� _ fo, �� .M 1N10/I�D 10U 4 e ` `' Jc ,■ .. •L'43AS40W 3dVO00dV'l tSii•YJ bLM10 r1 Mp191MYM M AvAm"w!O w3Nww'MU aantvaatvnn HVIONI r` r 7 o d .. • • • • • ♦ �� _ i + -o uyor 17VdUW ord=IH 9 3a(1 dW= AdddH 1NIOd 2 i Y I: �.•c 11 -� 6 W U co Q -. I Z O I— LLJ ATTACHMENT 4 PROPOSAL- POINT HAPPY- LA QUINTA SUBMITTED BY VALERIE MILLER,CONSULTANT FOR MADISON DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IS COLLABORATION BETWEEN TWO ARTISTS: FELICIA AND JOHN KREIG (NATURAL EFFECTS) La Quinta City Council La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Indian Sculpture, Historical Artifact and Water Feature Construction Bronze fountain titled "Family". Approximately six feet high and 4 feet in diameter. With five figures bearing a likeness to the local Cahuilla Indian women. Artist: Felicia. Bronze sculpture to include internal pluming that controls the water flow from various points: such as the clay pots and some areas under the rock formation. Delivery to the site: Total cost for her portion: $589000.00 Water Feature: Waterfalls and Basins Proposal is inclusive of artist's fee ❑ Permits 500.00 ❑ Excavation And soil excavation (hand digging) 2500.00 v 40 mil.liner/chicken wire/pumped concrete 4950.00 ❑ Plumbing 3100.00 ❑ Electric 1900.00 ❑ Equipment o 4 - Submersible pumps 2600.00 o Bio Filters 675.00 o 1-Skimmer 275.00 o 2- Autofill units 200.00 o 9- Low Voltage Lights 2500.00 468 C.0'r f ❑ Riverstone to line basins 2500.00 ❑ Boulders & Grouting 4200.00 ❑ Setting Sculpture provided by Felicia 500.00 ❑ Setting monument sign provided by outside source 500.00 d Monument Sign (Budgeted) 1000.00 ❑ Hardscape 3000.00 ❑ Landscape, irrigation- Outdoor Lighting 6000.00 ❑ Dry wells - if needed ❑ Soil testing fees -- if needed ❑ Mass grading — unknown Total : $94,950.00 469 C. 0 8 a rt W O -0 d pi N C7 C --( a O O rn OQ (D -v ° :3n o < 3 z C o m 3 - rt o p 0 ° n o m Q N ° o " w o rn UQ m O w m c" D a a m o aq o O o- (D `� o -v o C fD o rt m �' oa m (A m s m � — w as 3 0 0000 �- ((D c �- ? E m �• Z � � n "i v► (ii "� A� � C v f" I 1�� to n -v n cn r* O V1 �_► t-! _ 3 �/► Oq M N• O �- O m C m �• a o :3 r+ '� a o A� m -v m �,' � fD C O o- C o -s 3 �- m m a fD �G vwi a ATTACHMENT 5 r V) 0 s M m �• rmC-�(A • O N � > O• m = r+ m a 00 I OrQ� O I in y 0 0p * n W < "— 3 m. 7 m w D o m -n 0 a t=- vim, 0 y 3 c n m `" o �' 3- N a'A -It ccr a' `o 0� a a. n 3 m a O 1 c ° m m m �• Ln m %o "' c O 3 c � or � S -�' O' (p fm Q a n a _szo < aa' � 3' � �� ov 5ZO� m < � 2.� o � n _ ` O m C cn N .� c m o- cn '^ m D ,� O D �' N, T o' Pia O n ,�.� N n O0 N O �' =' ?' O c m' ci ? �' m m a o m s �- w m �- a cn cn m �' fD d 00 w m W Q O a `^ N I •o O O• = QQ O � =�^o a 143 V a z w ut 2 rt %0 4 71. G' 10 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: Consideration of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 1 1.44, Section 1 1.44.060 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (Parks and Recreation Areas) Relative to the Use of Barbeques at Public Facilities RECOMMENDATION: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Introduce an Ordinance amending Chapter 1 1.44, Section 1 1.44.060 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (Parks and Recreation Areas) relative to the use of barbeques at public facilities: A. Move to take up Ordinance No. by title and number only and waive further reading. B. Move to introduce Ordinance No. on first reading. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the July 3, 2001 City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to clarify the language in Section 1 1.44.060 of the La Quinta Municipal Code regarding the use of personal barbeques at public facilities. Attachment 1 provides the current language as found in Section 1 1.44.060 of the Municipal Code. Sections 11.44.060, (H) and (K) refer to the use of barbeques. Attachment 2 is a redline version of the proposed changes to the section, whereas Attachment 3 represents how the code would read if the Ordinance is adopted. In Attachment 3, Section 11.44.060 (K) has been added to clarify that cooking in barbeques may only be done in City provided, permanent barbeque equipment. The City currently provides barbeques at Fritz Burns Park and barbeques are planned as part of the Community Park amenities. 472 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Introduce an Ordinance amending Chapter 1 1.44, Section 1 1.44.060 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (Parks and Recreation Areas) relative to the use of barbeques at public facilities; or 2. Do not introduce an Ordinance amending Chapter 11.44, Section 11.44.060 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (Parks and Recreation Areas) relative to the use of barbeques at public facilities; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. sp tfully bmitted, Dodie Horvitz, giAnmunity Services Director Approved f r submission by: - [1, "L, Q-�- homas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Current Section 11.44.060 of the La Quinta Municipal Code 2. Redline Version of Section 11.44.060 of the La Quinta Municipal Code 3. Proposed Version of Section 1 1.44.060 of the Municipal Code 473 C2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER 11.44 SECTION 11.44.060 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE (PARKS AND RECREATION AREAS) RELATIVE TO THE USE OF BARBEQUES AT PUBLIC FACILITIES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. That Chapter 11.44, Section 11.44.060 (H), (J) and (K) of the La Quinta Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 1 1.44.060 (H): Make or kindle a fire except as provided in paragraph K; 1 1.44.060 (J): Bring a portable grill, stove or barbeque into the area; 11.44.060 (K): Utilize anything other than the City -provided, permanent equipment to cook or barbeque food; SECTION II. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION III. POSTING: The City Clerk shall within fifteen (15) days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three (3) public places designated by resolution of the City Council; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance; and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 2000, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members ♦(Clerk's Office will enter) NOES: None♦ ABSENT: None♦ ABSTAIN: None♦ 474 JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California ATTACHMENT 1 LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE 11.44.060 Prohibited conduct generally. Within the limits of any public park or recreation area of the city, no person shall: A. Hitch, fasten, lead, drive or let loose any animal or fowl of any kind; provided, that this shall not apply to a dog when led by a cord or chain, not more than six feet long; B. Ride or drive any horse or other animal, or propel any vehicle, cycle or automobile, except at a place especially designated and provided for such purpose; C. Carry or discharge any firearm, airgun, slingshot or other device designed or intended to discharge, or capable of discharging any dangerous missile; provided, that this subsection shall not apply to any peace officer or other person lawfully licensed to carry a concealed weapon or who regularly carries a weapon in connection with private employment protecting property or persons (e.g., private patrol services and bodyguards); D. Carry or discharge any firecracker, rocket, torpedo or any other fireworks; provided, that this subsection shall not be deemed to prohibit the possession or use of safe and sane fireworks not otherwise prohibited by law, at places designated or provided for such purpose; E. Cut, break, injure, deface, or disturb any tree, shrub, plant, rock, building, cage, pen, monument, fence, bench or other structure, apparatus or property; or pluck, pull up, cut, take or remove any shrub, bush, plant or flower, or mark or write upon, paint or deface in any manner, any building, monument, fence, bench or other structure; F. Cut or remove any wood, turf, grass, soil, rock, sand, gravel, or fertilizer; G. Swim, bathe, wade in, or pollute the water of any fountain, pond, lake or stream, except at a place especially designated and provided for such purpose; H. Make or kindle a fire except in a picnic stove, brazier, fire pit, or other appropriate device provided or approved for that purpose by the public authorities; I. Camp or lodge therein at any time, or otherwise remain overnight, whether or not in a structure permanently affixed to the ground, except at a place especially designated and provided for such purpose; J. Cook, prepare, serve or eat any meal, barbecue or picnic except at the places provided therefor; K. Wash dishes or empty salt water or other waste liquids elsewhere than in facilities provided for such purposes; L. Leave garbage, cans, bottles, papers or other refuse elsewhere than in receptacles provided therefor; M. Play or engage in model airplane flying, driving of golf balls, archery, baseball, softball, football, soccer, volleyball or any similar games of a hazardous nature except at such places as are especially set apart for such purposes; N. Play or bet at or against any game which is played, conducted, dealt or carried on with cards, dice, or other device, for money, chips, shells, credit or any other representative of value, or maintain or exhibit any gambling table or other instrument of gambling or gaming; O. Indulge in riotous, offensive, threatening, or indecent conduct, or abusive, threatening, profane, or indecent language; 412 476 t 0 6 P. Disturb in any unreasonable manner any picnic, meeting, service, concert, exercise or exhibition; Q. Distribute any commercial handbill (as defined in Section 5.20.020) without a prior permit so to do from the city manager, which permit shall be issued only after due processing of an application pursuant to Chapter 5.20, and then only if the city manager determines that it would be affirmatively in the public interest to allow upon public property the commercial activity involved; R. Post, place, erect, or leave posted, placed or erected, any commercial or noncommercial bill, handbill, circular, notice, paper, or advertising device or matter of any kind, in or upon any building, structure, pole, wire, or other architectural or natural feature of whatever character, except upon a bulletin board or such place especially designated and provided for such purposes, unless prior approval so to do has been obtained from the city manager, which approval shall be given only if the city manager determines that it would be affirmatively in the public interest to allow the use of public property for such purposes, or that constitutional principles require that it be allowed; S. Sell or offer for sale any merchandise, article or thing whatsoever, or practice, carry on, conduct, or solicit for, any trade, occupation, business or profession, unless the activity has been expressly allowed pursuant to specific provisions to such effect contained in either: a permit issued pursuant to Section 11.44.040; a permit issued pursuant to Chapter 5.36; a permit issued pursuant to Chapter 5.48; a concession agreement or franchise or the like duly entered into or granted by the city council; T. Remain, stay or loiter therein between the hours of ten p.m. and dawn of the following day, except while attending a gathering or meeting for which a permit has been issued or which is being sponsored or conducted by the city. This subsection shall not apply to persons lawfully lodging, camping or otherwise remaining overnight at a place especially designated and provided for such purposes; U. Use any restroom, washroom or dressing facility designated for the opposite sex, except that this subsection shall not apply to children six years of age or younger who are accompanied by an adult or other older person; V. Row, sail or operate any boat, craft or other device, on or in any pond, lake, stream or water except at such place as is especially designated and provided for use of such boat, craft, or device; W. Hunt, frighten, chase, set snare for, catch, injure or destroy any animal or bird; or destroy, remove or disturb any of the young or eggs of the same, or injure or maltreat any domestic or other animal; X. Fish with hook and line, seine, trap, spear, or net, or by any other means, in any pond, lake, stream or water, except at a place especially designated and provided for such purpose. (Ord. 10 § 1(part), 1982) 413 4 7 � `1 ATTACHMENT 2 LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE 11.44.060 Prohibited conduct generally. Within the limits of any public park or recreation area of the city, no person shall: A. Hitch, fasten, lead, drive or let loose any animal or fowl of any kind; provided, that this shall not apply to a dog when led by a cord or chain, not more than six feet long; B. Ride or drive any horse or other animal, or propel any vehicle, cycle or automobile, except at a place especially designated and provided for such purpose; C. Carry or discharge any firearm, airgun, slingshot or other device designed or intended to discharge, or capable of discharging any dangerous missile; provided, that this subsection shall not apply to any peace officer or other person lawfully licensed to carry a concealed weapon or who regularly carries a weapon in connection with private employment protecting property or persons (e.g., private patrol services and bodyguards); D. Carry or discharge any firecracker, rocket, torpedo or any other fireworks; provided, that this subsection shall not be deemed to prohibit the possession or use of safe and sane fireworks not otherwise prohibited by law, at places designated or provided for such purpose; E. Cut, break, injure, deface, or disturb any tree, shrub, plant, rock, building, cage, pen, monument, fence, bench or other structure, apparatus or property; or pluck, pull up, cut, take or remove any shrub, bush, plant or flower, or mark or write upon, paint or deface in any manner, any building, monument, fence, bench or other structure; F. Cut or remove any wood, turf, grass, soil, rock, sand, gravel, or fertilizer; G. Swim, bathe, wade in, or pollute the water of any fountain, pond, lake or stream, except at a place especially designated and provided for such purpose; H. Make or kindle a fire except JL Steve, brazier-, fire pit .,r ether appropriate . eyiee provided rovide .,r th h; I. Camp or lodge therein at any time, or otherwise remain overnight, whether or not in a structure permanently affixed to the ground, except at a place especially designated and provided for such purpose, K-. Wash dishes or empty salt water or other waste liquids elsewhere than in facilities provided for such purposes; L11�. Leave garbage, cans, bottles, papers or other refuse elsewhere than in receptacles provided therefor; . M. Play or engage in model airplane flying, driving of golf balls, archery, baseball, softball, football, soccer, volleyball or any similar, games of a hazardous nature except at such places as are especially set apart for such purposes; 473 COS N . Play or bet at or against any game which is played, conducted, dealt or carried on with cards, dice, or other device, for money, chips, shells, credit or any other representative of value, or maintain or exhibit any gambling table or other instrument of gambling or gaming; Op". Indulge in riotous, offensive, threatening, or indecent conduct, or abusive, threatening, profane, or indecent language; P- 01711i. Disturb in any unreasonable manner any picnic, meeting, service, concert, exercise or exhibition; �. Distribute any commercial handbill (as defined in Section 5.20.020) without a prior permit so to do from the city manager, which permit shall be issued only after due processing of an application pursuant to Chapter 5.20, and then only if the city manager determines that it would be affirmatively in the public interest to allow upon public property the commercial activity involved; R''. Post, place, erect, or leave posted, placed or erected, any commercial or noncommercial bill, handbill, circular, notice, paper, or advertising device or matter of any kind, in or upon any building, structure, pole, wire, or other architectural or natural feature of whatever character, except upon a bulletin board or such place especially designated and provided for such purposes, unless prior approval so to do has been obtained from the city manager, which approval shall be given only if the city manager determines that it would be affirmatively in the public interest to allow the use of public property for such purposes, or that constitutional principles require that it be allowed; ST. Sell or offer for sale any merchandise, article or thing whatsoever, or practice, carry on, conduct, or solicit for, any trade, occupation, business or profession, unless the activity has been expressly allowed pursuant to specific provisions to such effect contained in either: a permit issued pursuant to Section 11.44.040; a permit issued pursuant to Chapter 5.36; a permit issued pursuant to Chapter 5.48; a concession agreement or franchise or the like duly entered into or granted by the city council; TU. Remain, stay or loiter therein between the hours of ten p.m. and dawn of the following day, except while attending a gathering or meeting for which a permit has been issued or which is being sponsored or conducted by the city. This subsection shall not apply to persons lawfully lodging, camping or otherwise remaining overnight at a place especially designated and provided for such purposes; . Use any restroom, washroom or dressing facility designated for the opposite sex, except that this subsection shall not apply to children six years of age or younger who are accompanied by an adult or other olderperson; V- . Row, sail or operate any boat, craft or other device, on or in any pond, lake, stream or water except at such place as is especially designated and provided for use of such boat, craft, or device; W. Hunt, frighten, chase, set snare for, catch, injure or destroy any animal or bird; or destroy, remove or disturb any of the young or eggs of the same, or injure or maltreat any domestic or other animal; `. Fish with hook and line, seine, trap, spear, or net, or by any other means, in any pond, lake, stream or water, except at a place especially designated and provided for such purpose. (Ord. 10 § 1(part), 1982) 479 cOIA ATTACHMENT 3 LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE 11.44.060 Prohibited conduct generally. Within the limits of any public park or recreation area of the city, no person shall: A. Hitch, fasten, lead, drive or let loose any animal or fowl of any kind; provided, that this shall not apply to a dog when led by a cord or chain, not more than six feet long; B. Ride or drive any horse or other animal, or propel any vehicle, cycle or automobile, except at a place especially designated and provided for such purpose; C. Carry or discharge any firearm, airgun, slingshot or other device designed or intended to discharge, or capable of discharging any dangerous missile; provided, that this subsection shall not apply to any peace officer or other person lawfully licensed to carry a concealed weapon or who regularly carries a weapon in connection with private employment protecting property or persons (e.g., private patrol services and bodyguards); D. Carry or discharge any firecracker, rocket, torpedo or any other fireworks; provided, that this subsection shall not be deemed to prohibit the possession or use of safe and sane fireworks not otherwise prohibited by law, at places designated or provided for such purpose; E. Cut, break, injure, deface, or disturb any tree, shrub, plant, rock, building, cage, pen, monument, fence, bench or other structure, apparatus or property; or pluck, pull up, cut, take or remove any shrub, bush, plant or flower, or mark or write upon, paint or deface in any manner, any building, monument, fence, bench or other structure; F. Cut or remove any wood, turf, grass, soil, rock, sand, gravel, or fertilizer; G. Swim, bathe, wade in, or pollute the water of any fountain, pond, lake or stream, except at a place especially designated and provided for such purpose; H. Make or kindle a fire, except as provided in paragraph K; I. Camp or lodge therein at any time, or otherwise remain overnight, whether or not in a structure permanently affixed to the ground, except at a place especially designated and provided for such purpose; J. Bring a portable grill, stove, or barbecue into the area; K. Utilize anything other than the City -provided, permanent barbecue equipment to cook or barbecue food; L. Wash dishes or empty salt water or other waste liquids elsewhere than in facilities provided for such purposes; M. Leave garbage, cans, bottles, papers or other refuse elsewhere than in receptacles provided therefor; N. Play or engage in model airplane flying, driving of golf balls, archery, baseball, softball, football, soccer, volleyball or any similar games of a hazardous nature except at such places as are especially set apart for such purposes; O. Play or bet at or against any game which is played, conducted, dealt or carried on with cards, dice, or other device, for money, chips, shells, credit or any other representative of value, or maintain or exhibit any gambling table or other instrument of gambling or gaming; 480 ';10 P. Indulge in riotous, offensive, threatening, or indecent conduct, or abusive, threatening, profane, or indecent language; Q. Disturb in any unreasonable manner any picnic, meeting, service, concert, exercise or exhibition; R. Distribute any commercial handbill (as defined in Section 5.20.020) without a prior permit so to do from the city manager, which permit shall be issued only after due processing of an application pursuant to Chapter 5.20, and then only if the city manager determines that it would be affirmatively in the public interest to allow upon public property the commercial activity involved; S. Post, place, erect, or leave posted, placed or erected, any commercial or noncommercial bill, handbill, circular, notice, paper, or advertising device or matter of any kind, in or upon any building, structure, pole, wire, or other architectural or natural feature of whatever character, except upon a bulletin board or such place especially designated and provided for such purposes, unless prior approval so to do has been obtained from the city manager, which approval shall be given only if the city manager determines that it would be affirmatively in the public interest to allow the use of public property for such purposes, or that constitutional principles require that it be allowed; T. Sell or offer for sale any merchandise, article or thing whatsoever, or practice, carry on, conduct, or solicit for, any trade, occupation, business or profession, unless the activity has been expressly allowed pursuant to specific provisions to such effect contained in either: a permit issued pursuant to Section 11.44.040; a permit issued pursuant to Chapter 5.36; a permit issued pursuant to Chapter 5.48; a concession agreement or franchise or the like duly entered into or granted by the city council; U. Remain, stay or loiter therein between the hours of ten p.m. and dawn of the following day, except while attending a gathering or meeting for which a permit has been issued or which is being sponsored or conducted by the city. This subsection shall not apply to persons lawfully lodging, camping or otherwise remaining overnight at a place especially designated and provided for such purposes; V. Use any restroom, washroom or dressing facility designated for the opposite sex, except that this subsection shall not apply to children six years of age or younger who are accompanied by an adult or other older person; W. Row, sail or operate any boat, craft or other device, on or in any pond, lake, stream or water except at such place as is especially designated and provided for use of such boat, craft, or device; X. Hunt, frighten, chase, set snare for, catch, injure or destroy any animal or bird; or destroy, remove or disturb any of the young or eggs of the same, or injure or maltreat any domestic or other animal; Y. Fish with hook and line, seine, trap, spear, or net, or by any other means, in any pond, lake, stream or water, except at a place especially designated and provided for such purpose. (Ord. 10 § 1(part), 1982) 481 (A l REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: /(0 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA July 10, 2001 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Robbins who lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Jacques Abels, Richard Butler, Tom Kirk, Robert Tyler, and Chairman Steve Robbins. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, City Attorney Kathy Jenson, Planning Manager Christine di lorio, Senior Engineer Steve Speer, Planning Consultant Nicole Criste, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Associate Planner Michele Rambo, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed IV. ELECTION OF THE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR: A. Chairman Robbins opened the nominations for Chair. 1. Commissioner Butler nominated Jacques Abels. Commissioner Kirk seconded the motion. 2. There being no further nominations, nominations were closed and Jacques Abels was unanimously elected Chair. B. Chairman Abels opened the nominations for Vice Chair. 1 . Commissioner Kirk nominated Richard . Butler. Commissioner Robbins seconded the motion. 2. There being no further nominations, nominations were closed and Richard Butler was unanimously elected Vice Chair. V. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Chairman Abels asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of June 26, 2001. Commissioner Tyler asked that Page 8, Item 16 be corrected to read "...until the property owner wants to...."; Page 9, Item G:\WPDOCS\PC7-10-01.wpd 1 `� 482 Planning Commission Minutes July 10, 2001 20 be corrected to read "...beyond what can be decided at this time." Commissioner Kirk asked that Page 9, Item 23 be corrected to read, "Commissioner Kirk stated for consistency, the issues not ripe until a specific project is proposed." There being no further corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Butler to approve the minutes as corrected. Unanimously approved. B. Department Report: None. VI. PRESENTATIONS: None. VII. PUBLIC HEARING: A. Environmental Assessment 2001-425, Conditional Use Permit 2001-061, and Site Development Permit 2001-706; a request of AT&T Wireless Services. for certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and approval of the installation of a 65 foot high wireless antenna with monopalm prototype design and construction of a single story 1,002 square foot building for related equipment to be located west of Eisenhower Drive, north of Los Arboles and south of Avenida Fernando within the La Quinta Resort and Club. 1. Planning Manager Christine di lorio stated a request had been received by the applicant to continue this hearing to July 24, 2001, to allow the applicant additional time to complete their application. 2. There being no discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Robbins to continue Environmental Assessment 2001, Conditional Use Permit 2001-061 and Site Development Permit 2001-706, to July 24, 2001. Unanimously approved. B. Conditional Use Permit 2001-058 and Site Development Permit 2001- 702; a request of Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses for approval of the development plans and construction of a 4,000 square foot church and a future church building with ancillary facilities on 2.39 acres on the east side of Dune Palms Road, between Westward Ho Drive and the Coachella Valley Storm Channel. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 483 G:\WPDOCS\PC7-10-01 .wpd 2 Planning Commission Minutes July 10, 2001 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if windows were omitted due to a religious concern. Staff stated the applicant should answer this. Commissioner Tyler noted a correction in the conditions and asked if the number of parking spaces required was for the ultimate buildout of the project. Staff stated this was correct. 3. Commissioner Butler asked if the second building would come back to the Planning Commission. Staff stated the second building elevations would come back to the Commission. Commissioner Butler asked if there was a time frame by which the second building would have to be built. Staff stated there is no time frame. Commissioner Butler asked staff to clarify the location of the project. 4. Commissioner Kirk asked about the property to the north of the project site. Staff stated it is zoned Low Density Residential. On the south is a mobile home project and to the east is Low Density Residential. 5. Commissioner Robbins asked staff to explain the accent band that was indicated on the drawings. Staff stated it was the band around the window detail. Commissioner Robbins asked staff to clarify what Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee conditions had been met. Staff stated Condition #1 had been met and #2 had been partially satisfied. 6. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Adam Elkins, representing the Kingdom of Jehovah Witnesses, stated there is no significance to whether or not they have windows. They generally do not want the windows due to vandalism, so any time they can avoid it they do so. 7. Commissioner Tyler asked what their relation was to the church on Darby Road. Mr. Elkins stated they are a growing church community and each is a separate congregation. 8. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened the project for Commission discussion. 9. Commissioner Robbins stated he understood the applicant's concerns regarding vandalism, but he would like to have windows on the Dune Palms Road elevation. G:\WPDOCS\PC7-10-01 .wpd 3 Planning Commission Minutes July 10, 2001 10. Commissioner Kirk stated he concurred and given the surrounding uses being Low Density Residential, he would like to reconsider the lighting and require the low profile lighting in the parking lot. He concurs with Commissioner Robbins, but would go even further and require windows on at least three sides. 11. Commissioner Tyler concurred with Commissioner Kirk. 12. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-093 approving Conditional Use Permit 2001-058, subject to the findings and conditions as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. 13. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-094 approving Site Development Permit 2001-702, subject to the findings and conditions as amended: A. Condition #24: "Retention basins shall be visible from the adjacent parking lot." B. Condition #49: Windows will be provided on the north, south, and west elevations. C. Delete Condition #50. D. Add Condition #61: Requiring the height of the light poles be reduced on the parking lot lighting plan. 14. Commissioner Butler stated he did not concur with windows on three sides. 15. Commissioner Kirk stated his concern was that the north and south elevations are visible from the street as well as the neighbors. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. - - 4 485 G:\WPDOCS\PC7-1 01 .wpd Planning Commission Minutes July 10, 2001 C. Site Development Permit 2001-669; a request of James R. Paul for review of a proposed sign program for an approved multi -tenant industrial/office building located at 79-440 Corporate Centre Drive, within the La Quinta Corporate Center. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Michele Rambo presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Robbins asked staff to clarify the request. Staff stated they were requesting approval of the tenant and directory sign and not the monument sign. The monument sign requires a specific plan amendment. Discussion followed as to the different signs. 3. Commissioner Butler asked if the height proposed was allowed. Staff stated the height was not defined in the Code, but there was a 48-foot maximum size. 4. Commissioner Kirk asked why the applicant was making application for an amendment to the existing Code requirement. Staff stated the applicant could address this under a sign program. Commissioner Kirk asked what would happen if one tenant took two lease spaces. Staff stated they would still only be allowed a total of 80 percent of the total store frontage as designated by the sign program. 5. Commissioner Tyler asked if the specific plan modified the Code requirements. Staff stated it did not address size, but required them to submit a sign application under a Site Development Permit for each building. 6. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Mark Ross, Imperial Signs representing the applicant, clarified the designated sign area and stated that if a tenant took two spaces, they would still be required to submit an application to the City for approval. He went on to describe the material to be used for the sign. 7. Commissioner Tyler asked the applicant to show where the designated sign area was on the storefront. Mr. Ross showed where it was located. G:\WPDOCS\PC7-10-01.wpd 5 Planning Commission Minutes July 10, 2001 8. Commissioner Butler asked if this sign program would be applied to all the tenants. Mr. Ross stated that was correct for just this building within the Center. Staff stated the entire project had design guideline for each building and each would have to come in with a sign program to conform to the Specific Plan. Mr. Ross stated that depending on the use of the building, different signage would be needed. 9. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened the project for Commission discussion. 10. Commissioner Kirk asked what the Specific Plan requires; can the Specific Plan change the Zoning Code. Staff stated yes within the guidelines of the Specific Plan. Commissioner Kirk asked if the sign program must meet the Zoning Code if the Specific Plan did not have a sign program. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated that if you were going to exceed the Zoning Code requirements, it would have to be stated in the Specific Plan. Planning Manager Christine di lorio read the Zoning Code definition for sign program and stated the applicant is seeking additional flexibility in the sign program. Commissioner Kirk stated that if a registered trade mark is involved they could request a cabinet sign. Staff stated that was correct, but the Commission could deny the cabinet. The reference to a cabinet could be deleted from the condition. Commissioner Kirk asked why the Commission would have to address registered trademarks when they are submitting a sign program. Condition #2 could be removed. Staff clarified that staff in the past, has not supported what type of products are sold by the tenant in the sign program as a sign is for the identification of the business. 11. Commissioner Tyler stated that that type of information usually appears on the windows and can be controlled by the Zoning Code. 12. Commissioner Kirk asked if they met the sign program can they put whatever they want up for a sign. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated they would not be in compliance with the Zoning Code as it defines identification signs for multi -tenant buildings. 13. Commissioner Butler asked how the sign would be positioned if a tenant took two spaces. Staff stated a condition could be added allowing them to center the sign. G:\WPDOCS\PC7-10-01.wP d 6 487 Planning Commission Minutes July 10, 2001 14. Commissioner Robbins stated there was a discrepancy in the size of the sign and what is shown on the design. Mr. Ross stated the example shown in the picture is the east elevation on Dune Palms Road. If one tenant took two spaces they would still be limited by the size stipulation. 15. Commissioner Robbins stated there was enough discrepancy in what was being proposed that he would like the project to be continued as it is uncertain what they are proposing. 16. Commissioner Tyler asked if the applicant was entitled to signs on both frontages. Mr. Ross stated they have one tenant who would have two frontages. 17. Commissioner Robbins asked if the size was the same for all signs. Mr. Ross stated the signs are all different sizes as they were trying to achieve a balance in the signs. 18. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Kirk to ' adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-095 approving Site Development Permit 2001- 669, subject to the findings and conditions as amended. a. Condition #2 & 3 deleted. b. Condition #4: The proposed directory and monument signs are not a part of this approval ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: Commissioner Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. D. Site Development Permit 2001-682, Amendment #1; a request of World Gym Palm Desert, LLC for review of a revised exterior elevation and landscape plan -for a previously approved 25,500 square foot fitness center located at 46-760 Commerce Court, within the La Quinta Corporate Center. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Michele Rambo presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. G:\WPDOCS\PC7-10-01.wpd 7 Planning Commission Minutes July 10, 2001 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if the applicant could provide any rationale for their request. Staff stated cost was the reason for the request. 3. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant wanted to address the Commission. Ms. Wanda Mataranga, representing World Gym, stated they wanted a brick building, but the architect designed a building with awnings and plaster which they did not want. The building is 30 feet high and there are small 3 by 5 windows to bring natural light into the building to decrease the intense lighting. The awnings defeat the purpose of the windows which was to let in the natural light. 4. Commissioner Kirk asked why the applicant was objecting to plant sizes. Ms. Martaranga stated their only objection was the cost. 5. Commissioner Tyler asked if they were wanting smaller trees as well as the plant material. Ms. Mataranga stated both. Commissioner Tyler asked if the applicant was concerned about the amount of heat that would be coming in the windows. Ms. Mataranga stated the windows would be treated to keep the heat out and let the light in. Commissioner Tyler stated the purpose of the awnings was to add articulation and without them there is only a flat exterior. Ms. Mataranga stated the look of the building would not be changed by adding the awnings. 6. Commissioner Butler asked how much of the use of the building was on the second floor. Discussion followed regarding the size and whether Title 24 requirements would be changed. Commissioner Butler stated he was concerned about approving the smaller plant material. Ms. Mataranga stated they have invested a lot of money into this building and the landscaping will be maintained no matter what the size. 7. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened the project for Commission discussion. 8. Commissioner Kirk stated she agrees with the applicant's request to remove the awnings and retain the plant material as recommended by staff. 489 G:\WPDOCS\PC7-10-01 .wpd 8 Planning Commission Minutes July 10, 2001 9. Commissioner Butler stated he could concur with the applicant's request for both the plant material and awnings. 10. Commissioner Tyler stated he agrees with the elimination of the awnings, but he is concerned about the landscaping reduction. 11. Chairman Abels stated he agrees with the elimination of the awnings and reduction in plant material. 12. Following discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-096 approving Site Development Permit 2001- 682, Amendment #1, subject to the findings and conditions as amended: a. Condition #3 deleted. b. Condition 4: Palm trees shall be varied in height from six feet to eight feet. The shrub plant material as recommended by staff. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Tyler, Robbins and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. E. Environmental Assessment 2001-425 and Conditional Use Permit 2001- 060; a request of Verizon Wireless for Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and approval of the installation of a 60-foot high wireless antenna monopalm prototype design and related 230 square foot one story equipment building for cellular telephone service to be located on the north side of Highway 1 1 1, west of Adams Street within the One Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler questioned the environmental report in that all but two of the items listed, are listed as less than significant. If all are of no impact, why is there such an elaborate monitoring program. Staff stated they are Code requirements and by G:\WPDOCS\PC7-10-01 .wpd 9 400 Planning Commission Minutes July 10, 2001 complying with them it creates no impacts. Commissioner Tyler asked why the two that are less than significant are not included. Staff stated that in regard to aesthetics there is no need to do anything further than what is proposed. 3. Commissioner Kirk stated it does not make sense. If there are no impacts why is there a mitigation monitoring program. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated that was correct and it could be eliminated. 4. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Krugman, representing Verizon, stated he was available to answer any questions. 5. Commissioner Tyler asked where the tower would be located. Mr. Krugman explained the location and stated the building was ten feet six inches high and the two foot dish would remain. 6. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened the project for Commission discussion. 7. Commissioner Tyler asked who was using the trash enclosure. Staff stated it was used by the restaurant. 8. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-097 certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-425, as submitted. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. 9. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-098, approving Conditional Use Permit 2001-060, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Tyler, Robbins and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. 491 G:\WPDOCS\PC7-10-01.wpd 10 Planning Commission Minutes July 10, 2001 F. Site Development Permit 99-651, Amendment #1; a request of KSL Recreation Corporation for an amendment to Condition of Approval #17 of City Council resolution 99-71 that requires removal of the existing corporate office modular units on June 1, 2001, to be extended to November 30, 2001. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Butler asked if any complaints had been received regarding the proposal. Staff stated none had been received. 3. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Bill Dodds, representing KSL, stated he was available to answer any questions. 4. Commissioner Robbins asked if the applicant could meet the time frame to construct the new office buildings. Mr. Dodds stated yes, as the buildings are modular in construction enabling them to meet the deadline. 5. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened the project for Commission discussion. 6. There being no further discussion it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-099 approving Site Development Permit 99-651, Amendment #1, subject to the findings and conditions as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. VIII. BUSINESS ITEMS: None G:\WPDOCS\PC7-10-01 .wpd 11 492. Planning Commission Minutes July 10, 2001 IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. X. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. Staff gave a report of the City Council meeting of July 19, 2001. XI. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held July 24, 2001, at 7:00 p.m. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 9:08 p.m. on July 10, 2001. Respectfully submitted, Betty J. Sawyer, Executive Secretary City of La Quinta, California 493 G:\WPDOCS\PC7-10-01 .wpd 12 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: _-Ae- MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA July 24, 2001 CALL TO ORDER .............. C. Staff present: Assistant City Attorne.y Christine di lorio, Senior Engineer Steve Betty Sawyer. PUBLIC COMMENT: MUMMY,] u order at 7:00 ins to lead the bert irez, Planning Manager id Executive Secretary Ms. Kim Bird, '52,360 Avenida Madero, stated that she had become aware that the Santa Rosa Plaza -Embassy Suites project had been scheduled for City Council on August 7, 2001. When their Referendum was denied by the Council they had agreed that this project would have to go back to the Planning Commission before going to the City Council ................... due to the new design that would have to be done. She was present to ask why this was bypassing the Commission and going directly to the City Council. In her opinion, this should come back to the Commission before going on to the City Council. She would also like to know if the applicant had permission to increase the size width. Commissioner Kirk asked if they could know the process. Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez stated the Commission could take no action at this time but staff 49 4? G:\WPD0CS\PC7-24-01.wpd 1 Planning Commission Minutes July 24, 2001 IV. V. could give a report on the process. Planning Manager Christine di lorio stated it was the determination by the Community Development Director with regards to the processing in accordance with the Code sections for General Permitting Process and the reference is to modifications by the applicant and the director determining that the plan modifications would result in a significant change, referred the matter back to the original decision making authority, which is the City Council. C. Kay Wolff, 77-227 Calle Ensenada, th Plan, Master Environmental Assessme at the library for review. It is an imp+ La Quinta and her concern is that distribution or circulation so the citiz educated comments. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Con CONSENT ITEMS: B. Departmen Report: None. RESENTATIO PUBLIC HEARING: ne. nK d stal and En tant document wr there tlrght not ice their op ing the General tI Assessment th+ .citizens of haws S. much intan and make <.+VI til IUVU - LA IVII VI II I IGI IIQI I IVI I LVV I -"FGJ. VVI IUIIIVI 1431 %JOV Permit 2001-061, and Site Development Permit 2001-706; a request of AT&T Wireless Services. for certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and approval of the installation of a 65 foot high wireless antenna with monopalm prototype design and construction of a single story 1,002 square foot building for related equipment to be located west of Eisenhower Drive, north of Los Arboles and south of Avenida Fernando within the La Quinta Resort and Club. 49*5 G:\WPD0CS\PC7-24-01.wod 2 Planning Commission Minutes July 24, 2001 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planing Manager Christine di lorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. questio monitoring program. eking; was that ion monitoring Wd not be any ark no impdt on air quality, why would we have progt'ams dealrr of staff. ff 4. Commissioner Butler asked if this was the third at the La Quinta Hotel and Resort facility. Staff stated it was the second ............... permanent; there were two temporary. Commissioner Butler asked if they were under the same groundshaking zone. Staff stated they would have to review the file. 5. Commissioner Tyler questioned a letter received by Mr. Jerry Swanger, Sr. stating his objection to the project, and whether the tower was constructed out of wrought iron. 496 G:\WPDOCS\PC7-24-01.wpd 3 Planning Commission Minutes July 24, 2001 6. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Ms. Polly Johnson, representing AT & T Wireless Services, stated it is a metal pole clad in a synthetic bark to have the appearance of a palm tree. She was available to answer any other questions. 9. Chairman Abels asked if anyone item. There being no further discu portion of the hearing was,, close discussion. Mel 11. Commissioner Kirk asked reflect there chenges. Commissi but has accept ar Quinte : uld like to speak on this the public participation I catn for Commission itig#tion Monitoring Program per Robbins stated he has no problem with this project, objection to the City of Indian Wells who will not commuln10at106towers, which pushes all them to La Palm Ceet; There being Commissi0,61 Reolution 2 of EnuironmE as amended. further discussion, it was moved and seconded by r Butler/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission 11-100 certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration al Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-426 Environmental Checklist VI.II be marked as no or less than significant impact. Delete the Mitigation Monitoring Program L CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. 13. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-101 approving Conditional Use Permit 2001-061, as recommended. G:\WPD0CS\PC7-24-01.wpd Planning Commission Minutes July 24, 2001 ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. 14. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-102 approving Site Development Permit 2001-706, to July 24, 2001, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk d .� r�s, Tyler, a Chairman Abels. NOES.. None. ABSTAIN; None . ABSEIL None. 2. Chai Corr1 like Abels aed .if there were any questions of staff. ner Butler stated he has reviewed the project and does ject, but they did not receive any colored renderings to ionr bobbins stated he too needed to have the colored Is to make a determination. Mr. Geoff McComic, Ong the applicant, presented colored elevations and stated vailable for any questions. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Tyler asked why staff was asking for one inch calipher trees measured three feet from grade in the front yard. That is a smaller tree than normally required for a project of this size. Mr. Mccomic stated the two trees were 36-inch box trees. Staff stated 15 gallon trees are about one inch in diameter. The developers are having difficulty obtaining quality plant material. 498 G:\WPD0CS\PC7-24-01.wpd 5 Planning Commission Minutes July 24, 2001 5. Commissioner Butler asked what the City standards were regarding the calipher of the tree. Staff stated it was determined by the conditions. The standards were based on the different tree types. 6. Commissioner Tyler asked if all the houses would be. one story. Mr. McComic stated they were all one story. 7. Commissioner Robbins asked ho Mr. McComic stated 78. 8. There being no further public public participation portion c for Commission discussion. w any unitsoilmthis subdivision. menu .Hairman be cloyed the he4fing and opened the project he wad unlcr the impression that n ce re airedsubdivision over a q Y.:. o have one l-andscape option for a Un this is not, there is a re11. q11 uireme 2" calipher and ten feet t': developments, which is whey1 a re once r nt for er Butler ` asked the applicant if water tolerant was going to be a problem. Mr. McComic stated they ha: ing 30% drought material. What they have found the property owner takes ownership, they either have °turf. )ner Kirk asked why we were requiring turf if the Code Mr. McComic states the 20-30% requirement works for has no problem providing a drought tolerant option. City Attorney John Ramirez stated that Section D)(2)-Public Education, of the Municipal Code states, -nes. At least one model home that is landscaped in each nsisting of eight or more homes shall demonstrate via signs and information, the principles of water efficient landscapes described in this chapter." G:\WPDOCS\PC7-24-01.wpd 6 Planning Commission Minutes July 24, 2001 OLL C Commissioners Tyler/Robbins before Pubic H"eating Item. C. VII. BUSINESS ITEMS, S: C=M`t I nerS Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and man Abel`s. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: to reorganized Agenda taking Business Item A A. Sign Permit 98-415, Amendment #1: a request of Southwest Sign Company (Storage USA) for review of proposed sign plans for an additional identification sign for the property located at 46-600 Adams Street. 1. Chairman Abels asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. G:\WPD0CS\PC7-24-01.wpd 7 500 Planning Commission Minutes July 24, 2001 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler stated the drawing of the sign states 50 square feet and the staff report states 58 square feet. Staff stated their analysis showed a total of 58 square feet. 3. Commissioner Robbins asked if the "Self Storage" were removed, could they increase the size of "Storage USA". St--- stated that was correct. as ner Kirl asked : how he addresses the wiring on the n. Mr. F6Vell stated the existing sign is constructed on architectural soffit over the entryway. There is actual on_ the Adams Street side of the building. ;ioner Butler asked how they would handle the exposed Mr. Fovell explained the construction of the sign. No wiring would be seen. ;ioner Tyler commended the applicant on the look and f the building. ng no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the rticipation portion and opened the item for Commission discussion. 9. There being no further discussion it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Minute Motion 2001-013 approving Site Development Permit 98-415, Amendment #1, subject to the findings and conditions as recommended. 501 Planning Commission Minutes July 24, 2001 a. Condition. #2 deleted. 10. Unanimously approved. PUBLIC HEARINGS - CONTINUED 10 c Section 9.50.090W). Corh�lMidner Tyler asked that it be changed -to "require" a conditional use permit. S :ion 9.60.030(C)(1)(c): Commissioner Tyler questioned other trellis' would be addressed. Staff stated they are considered a permanent structure. Approved as mmended. Jon 9.60.045: Commissioners questioned what the ilem was attaching to a wall. Staff explained the basic on was structural requirements. Change #1 to delete ;pt freestanding fireplaces and delete 2-4. f. Section 9.60.070(B)(2): Commissioner Robbins stated he does not understand why his pool equipment cannot be placed next to his house or fence. He has a 15-foot sideyard and the pool equipment has to be placed right in the middle of this setback instead of to either side to keep G:\WPD0CS\PC7-24-01.wpd 9 502 Planning Commission Minutes July 24, 2001 P h. Section 9.60.160(3). as red I ll'I :e. 0�d. i. Section 9.60.240, jjjH j. Section 9.60.250(E: k. Section 9.60.300(I)(1). b)(c): as recommended. ea>rnended. recommended. can 9.65,O30(A)(1..)(a)(b)(c)(d): add language to prohibit ity vault ir1 tke sidewalks. Sections (b) and (c) should ade optiols tf designs. Consider allowing upper stories tend out to the property line with no setback. Remove iclks and leave in guidelines. ion 9.65.040(D): Commissioner Kirk stated they ted more discretion than interpretation. As mmended. ion 9.65.040: as recommended, -.ion 9.100.150(G): as recommended. q. Section 9.150.060 Table 9-11: encourage tandem and sideloaded garages, but as recommended. r. Section 9.150.080(B)(1): leave the length at 19-feet; as recommended. G:\WPDOCS\PC7-24-01.wpd 10 503 Planning Commission Minutes July 24, 2001 S. Section 9.150.080(B)(7): as recommended. eak on this Is closed t4 the projeet missioner Tyler gave a report of the City Council meeting of July 19, X. A D J OUR: M INIT., mitted, Betty J. Sawyer, Executive Secretary City of La Quinta, California G:\WPDOCS\PC7-24-01.wpd 11 504 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: / I MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA July 11, 2001 I. CALL TO ORDER 10:00 a.m. A. This meeting of the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee was called to order at 10:07 a.m. by Principal Planner Stan Sawa, who led the flag salute. B. Committee Members present: Dennis Cunningham, Bill Bobbitt, and Frank Reynolds. C. Staff present: Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Management Analyst Marie Casillas, Associate Planner Greg Trousdell, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Principal Planner Stan Sawa asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of June 6, 2001. There being no corrections, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to approve the minutes as submitted. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Capital Property Improvement Program 2001-010; a request of Mr. Heinz Steinmann for funding to repair stucco and paint exterior of building and retaining wall, install screening/shade cloth on chain link fence, repair sprinkler system and install new landscaping, and install parking stops on the north side of property located on the west side of Avenida Bermudas - United Stated Post Office building. 1. Management Analyst Maria Casillas presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 505 GAWPD0CS\ALRC7-11-01.wpd 1 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes July 11, 2001 2. Committee Member Bobbitt stated that when the original proposal was scored a recommendation was made to delete the shade cloth and he has not changed his mind regarding that. In regard to the retaining wall that adjoins the two properties there is a small bed area and he would like to know if any landscaping was proposed for that area. Staff stated the applicant was working with the adjoining property owner and is willing to do the work. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the area looks bad and should be addressed. 3. Committee Member Reynolds stated he did not see any change in the request. 4. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he concurred, but would like to see something done with the retaining wall planter. He sees no need to see it rescore the application. 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2001-025 reaffirming the previous scoring and include landscaping for the bed area, but not the retaining wall for Capital Property Improvement Program 2001-010 with the deletion of the shade cloth. Unanimously approved with the original score of 90. B. Site Development Permit 2001-706; a request of AT&T Wireless Service for review of landscaping and architectural plans for a single story equipment building to serve a new monopalm communication antenna and related hotel telecommunication equipment for the property located at 49-499 Eisenhower Drive within the La Quinta Resort and Club. 1. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he attended the Council meeting when Sprint proposed their monopalm and asked how close this pole was to that one. Staff stated that location is over 800 feet from this one. It was staff's understanding that the City Council prefers to have a monopalm design if roof mounted facilities are unaccessible. At that meeting there was only one neighbor who objected and Council reviewed a photometric plan and approved the monopalm antenna. G:\WPDOCS\ALRC7-11-0l.wP d 2 506 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes July 11, 2001 3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if this plan represented the changes recommended by staff. Staff stated the project was conditioned to meet the specific plan for this entire area and to give guidelines to see that the proposal is consistent for the building. 4. Ms. Polly Johnson, representing AT&T, stated AT&T owns the building and leases from area from the Hotel. It will house the telephone switching units to free up space at the hotel. 5. Committee Member Cunningham asked if this was to resemble the units built in the 1970's and asked if KSL had approved the design. Staff stated it was built to resemble the 1970's units and it had been approved by KSL. 6. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Cunningham/Reynolds adopt Minute Motion 2001-028 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-706, subject to the conditions as submitted. C. Site Development Permit 2001-707; a request of PM La Quinta, LLC for review of landscaping and architectural plans for four new prototype residential units with three to four facades each for the property located at the northeast corner of Orchard Lane and Avenue 50. 1. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the landscape plans would be submitted separately. Staff stated the Committee could conceptually approve what was before them. 3. Committee Member Cunningham asked about the perimeter landscaping. Staff stated it was approved by the Planning Commission with the original tract map. Committee Member Cunningham stated his concern was what would be seen from the street. The product design is an asset. He wanted to be sure the landscaping design was cohesive with the existing. 4. Mr. Geoff McComic, representing PM La Quinta, stated the wall would be structured and colored the same as what has been built by Rancho La Quinta. 507 G:\WPDOCS\ALRC7-11-0 l .wpd 3 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes July 11, 2001 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Cunningham/Reynolds adopt Minute Motion 2001-029 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-707, as presented. D. Site Development Permit 2001-706; a request of Country Club of the Desert for review of preliminary landscaping plans for Jefferson Street, Avenue 52, and Avenue 54 parkway. 1 . Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Reynolds stated he was concerned about the 24-foot high berm on Avenue 54. You cannot landscape on a slope 24 feet high as you do a six foot berm. The plans do not agree with what is on the ground. Staff stated that in regard to the berm, staff is waiting to see if an appeal is filed regarding the berm height. That could affect this plan. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt stated that as it is presented it would require double the plant material to plant Avenue 54, as what is stated on the plan. The original plan was a minimum six feet high berm. If the City Council approves the height of the berm, the proposed trees will accentuate the height even more. Staff stated the berm was reviewed by the Planning Commission and approved. There has been mention that it may be appealed. 4. Committee Member Cunningham stated that if the berm height is changed it will drastically change the landscape plan. 5. Mr. Steve Garcia, landscape architect for the project, stated the Avenue 54 work is divided into two units: street scape and golf course. There is a fence that has been relocated lower on the berm to denote the scope of work between the golf course and streetscape. The height of the berm varies on Avenue 54. This is what is represented on the plans before the Committee and it will not impact the look for Avenue 54 as presented. No trees will be planted on the top of the berm as part of the golf course. 6. Committee Member Bobbitt stated that if the wall is the dividing point, the design will work. WITS" G:\WPDOCS\ALRC7-11-0l .wpd 4 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes July 11, 2001 7. Committee Member Reynolds stated the berm appears to be closer to the street than what appears on the drawings. Mr. Garcia stated the drawings represents the overall design for the site. The landscaping will mask the berm. 8. Committee Member Bobbitt stated that in regard to the Raphiolepis Indica Ballerina, they may not have good luck with it as there is a high salt content in the ground which stresses the plant. Mr. Garcia stated they are willing to change if necessary. Their intent is to keep the Raphiolepis Indica Ballerina in the shade areas. 9. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if this was the same plan for Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street. Mr. Garcia stated yes, but it will be different on the Madison Street side due to the agricultural overlay requirements. 10. Committee Member Bobbitt asked how the golf course would be phased. Ms. Nancy Aaronson stated it should be done over the next two to three years. Committee Member Bobbitt asked the applicant to explain the process on how the berm height came to be. Ms. Aaronson explained. Discussion followed. 11. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Cunningham/Reynolds adopt Minute Motion 2001-030 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-706, as requested. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None VIII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Reynolds to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on August 1, 2001. This meeting was adjourned at 10:57 a.m. on July 11, 2001. Respectfully submitted, BETTY J. SAWYER, Executive Secretary City of La Quinta, California 509 GAWPD0CS\ALRC7-11-01.wpd 5 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA June 21, 2001 This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by Chairman Robert Wright at 3:01 p.m. who led the flag salute and asked for the roll call. V. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call. Present: Commissioners Irwin, Mitchell, Puente, and Chairman Wright. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/Puente to excuse Commissioner Sharp. Unanimously approved. Staff Present: Planning Manager Christine di lorio, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Secretary Carolyn Walker. PUBLIC COMMENT: None CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Mitchell/Puente to approve the Minutes of April 19, 2001, as submitted. Unanimously approved. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Addendum to Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey and Testing Report - Vista Montana Development; located at the northwest corner of Eisenhower Drive and Calle Tampico. Applicant: KSL Development Corporation - Archaeological Consultant: CRM TECH (Bruce Love) 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in .the Community Development Department. 510 PACAR0LYN\HPC6-21-01.wpd -1- Historic Preservation Commission Minutes June 21, 2001 2. Commissioners Mitchell, Puente and Chairman Wright concurred with staff's findings. 3. Commissioner Irwin stated the information submitted by Lillian Hunt was informative and made the report complete. 4. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Puente/Mitchell to adopt Minute Motion 2001-011 recommending approval of the Addendum to Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey and Testing Report - Vista Montana Development, located at the northwest corner of Eisenhower Drive and Calle Tampico. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS A. Commissioner Irwin opened a discussion about the safekeeping and use of historic materials being delivered to the Historical Society, on behalf of the City of La Quinta. Following discussion Commission Members asked that each Archaeological Report contain the following: 1. Three copies of the report submitted; one to be kept with the artifacts, one to accompany the report and one to be kept in the City files. In addition, disk containing the report will be submitted for permanent retention. 2. The Archaeologist shall include a summary of the artifacts found written in layman's terms, to be used in the future for students. In addition, the items included in the summaries be used to fulfill Assembly Bill requirements of Assembly Bill regarding museums, repositories/depositories to advise the State what is contained in their collections. This could also be used by students to locate artifacts they wish to study. Commissioner Irwin also asked about the development of a web site for student use. Planning Manager di lorio suggested this be included in an upcoming grant. 511 PACAR0LYN\HPC6-21-01.wpd -2- Historic Preservation Commission Minutes June 21, 2001 Commissioner Mitchell commented on the safety and handling of artifacts and the fact the City should be concerned about security. B. Commissioner Puente asked staff about the status of the Oliphant Williams project on Avenue 50. Planning Manager di lorio replied the artifacts were recovered and the developer cleared the site of the resources. A monitor was on site. Commissioner Irwin clarified this was not the Oliphant Williams project, but the Rancho La Quinta project. Planning Manager di lorio replied, the Rancho La Quinta project had not been monitored, or completed. VIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/Puente to adjourn this meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission to the next regularly scheduled meeting to be held on July 19, 2001. This meeting of the Historical Preservation Commission was adjourned at 3:25 p.m., June 21, 2001. Unanimously approved. Submitted by: Carolyn Walker Secretary 51+G P:\CAROLYN\HPC6-21-0l .wpd -3- �a��'"'" `�•c DEPARTMENT REPORT: J —A 44 IvCo� m�4 5 OF 9ti TO: FROM: DATE: RE: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager ,11," August 21, 2001 Department Report — Response(s) to Public Comments The following is the response to public comments made at the August 7, 2001 City Council meeting: 1. Mr. Karl Holt, 80-106 Palm Circle Drive, spoke regarding the Snellenberger project, which has changed the configuration of the golf course directly behind his home and has created a danger to residents. • The matter was referred to staff. Staff has discussed this matter with Mr. Holt, and has informed him that the City only controls the zoning of golf courses, and has no control over the actual golf course design. 2. Mr. Joseph Broido, 77-510 Calle Nogales, spoke regarding the timely posting of items on the City's web page. He also requested seven (7) specific items of information be provided to him with regard to the process for revision of the General Plan. • The web page issue was referred to staff. Staff is currently updating the City's web page. Mr. Broido was also advised that he could submit a request to the City Clerk for the General Plan information. The Community Development Department will provide a written response to Mr. Broido's request regarding the General Plan. 3. Ms. Betty Chaney, 54-255 Avenida establish a "memorial cactus garden" deceased seniors. Carranza, spoke regarding the need to at the Senior Center to commemorate • Business Item No. 6 on the August 7, 2001 City Council agenda included discussion of an acknowledgment area to be established within the Civic Center Campus. 513 4. Ms. Beverly Brazil spoke regarding the response time of the La Quinta Police Department. • Ms. Brazil was advised that her item was on the agenda as a Mayor and Council Members Item, and would be discussed in greater detail later in the meeting. 514 a&Q•c DEPARTMENT REPORT: I -B L, V = rY INC OF TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager DATE: August 21, 2001 RE: Department Report - Bi-monthly City/Chamber Meeting of August 10, 2001 The following is a list of the items discussed at the August 10, 2001 City/Chamber meeting, along with a brief status report on each of the items: 1. 4" Annual Mayor's Cup Golf Challenge (September 10, 2001, La Quinta Resort Mountain Course, flyer attached) - Invitation letters have been sent to other Valley cities and chambers under the Mayor's signature. As in previous years, the City anticipates to register two teams. 2. La Quinta Map 2001 /02 - The La Quinta Chamber is in the process of updating the La Quinta City map, which will have a new production number of 16,000. City staff is expected to review a draft in late August; the final map is scheduled for distribution in September 2001. 3. City -owned Building in The Village - City and Chamber staff are working closely to ensure that any outstanding issues are addressed properly and expeditiously. Upgrades to the building are in progress. La Quinta Police Officers are expected to occupy the building within the next 30 days. 4. "State of the Chamber" Mayor's Lunch (September 6, 2001, La Quinta Resort, flyer attached) - The Chamber will be providing an update on Chamber activities. 5. Chamber Involvement in Mainstreet Marketplace - The Chamber has been sharing information with Kiner/Goodsell on the details of organizing Mainstreet. The Chamber is keeping a list of interested vendors that have called with inquiries. The list will be forwarded to the new events coordinator scheduled to join Kiner/Goodsell in early September 2001. 515 6. Desert Sands Unified School District "New Teacher's Luncheon" (August 28, 2001, DSUSD Offices) - The City's participation involves the donation of promotional items and the attendance of the Community Services Director. 7. 2nd Annual All Chamber Legislative Luncheon (September 28, 2001, Rancho Las Palmas Marriott, flyer attached) - Speakers will include Congresswoman Mary Bono, Senator Jim Battin, Assemblyman Dave Kelly, and Supervisor Roy Wilson. The Chamber is soliciting the City's or City Council Member 's interest in attending jointly with the Chamber and/or independently purchasing a table for 10 ($350). The per person cost is $35. In the past, staff has coordinated individual Council Member and staff attendance at this luncheon. 8. Other Items - Some additional items discussed included: 20" Anniversary Party (April 26-28, 2002); Embassy Suites; new Legislative Committee of Valley Chambers; and Calle Estado. Attachments 516 002 u M J 0 oc so NN w 0 i tN 4) J 3 V H s Q 0 am c� N � 3 c L ZUOy O EE >a � NOow�V '> c w- �0 N W�°a �cN0 0 6 VLL Z Et ._ 0 am JU11 (n 'm 0 3u ow H am 0=4a0a� UsLLMMM {� CA � Q un x c p p U a In Z Q ",�"tgM8 0 A= W � L a 0 u O b1 L o� d C Y _ E H am u Q 0 c d C H d C N a ` 2IL a m _ O c IL O c M c V :i H a c �a L C � � C L O c O r w N c u 4 IL0 4 0 No a c t IL L 0 CL a c C d O W c Q L O ai .. .0 C •Cw 4 0 cc E g=ea c 0 w 40' _ L W=dd• > v w d Cr cc N O w cc �w y U) N Q O C v L ICL a c N yw C N zN 7 ♦,.Ca 0 + o 0 4) PN y 0 p VV '�rw O 4. L 4 o N c C C O m C6�C3M l..Y Ncc o V Co— N d V 0 0 ` O y -S! Qao� 0 cc aa•� 1-00 00 F-- E- c I-- z v 0. V 000�o di = O ul) u) Cm CV) O W ��s�� y v)0000ait iz z 0 0 ea Q E 5.2 N ca Wo�'ccon �0 z o o a cn W y 0 ai J C 0 78 ..I .G vs eLa 0 0 Q O Co 0 cif V V dJ c� c H Ca H N C o Cc L M Ca W .r=1cccOC� v0D01313 13 00 W oc 0 F- W C� L ad z t� 0 0 z L N W m ulj N N C! cc U 4 c Q H W Q a Ca z 0 H Q U) 0 W J Q 518 004 �R 'o F Mayor's Luncheon September 6, 2001 11:45 a.m. La Quinta Resort & Club Fiesta Room Spas-�so�-ed by: "Cookies by DeNxgrPz " Meet your Officers & Board Members "Hot" Promotional/Marketing Tips First-hand "Success" Stories Highlights from Special Events 2001-2002 Chamber Opportunities & Important Up -coming Events ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... Featuring the Resort's delicious "Spa La Quinta" Menu consisting of Cool Cucumber Soup, Roosted Vegetable Pasta Salad, Turkey Pita Wraps, Chicken Sausage & Orrechieta Pasta, Meringue and Oatmeal Cookies, Coffee d Tea .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................: Chamber Members $18 Non -Members $23 Reservations a must — Call 760.564.3199 519 Be sure to bring your business cards for networking purposes and the business card drawing! 005 Sponsored by 165ilo U. T Springs in businsss... for business ^..—,•- •-ro-rI r. %-,- o T ! INDIOA rv`M O♦ i CIAMIEI IF COMMERCE e'4 op, as D � £ s CHAMBER of COMMERCE Palm Springs Chamber of Commerce AffidIONM1,1e MON0e18MANWO 2od,InnaJ Aff Chamber 0 Legislative Luncheon Speakers Congresswoman Mary Bono State Senator Jim Battin State Assemblyman Dave Kelley Supervisor Roy Wilson Friday September 2S, 2001 11:30 a.m. Marriott Rancho Las Palings Resort 41000 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage 35/per person $350/table of 10 Make checks payable to Coachella valley Chambers and mail to Cathedral City Chamber of Commerce 68-845 Perez Road, Suite 6 Cathedral City, CA 92234 Reservation deadline Friday, September 21, 2001 0� For further information call your local 520 Chamber of Commerce n13 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 35-t CITY COUNCIL'S UPCOMING EVENTS SEPTEMBER 4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - CANCELLED SEPTEMBER 12-15 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE - SACRAMENTO SEPTEMBER 18 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 19 JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN SEPTEMBER 25 SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL MEETING WITH CITY COMMISSIONS/BOARDS OCTOBER 2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 16 CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 6 CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 20 CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 18 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 521. August 2001 Monthly Planner I . a 0. . S. M73 1 2 4 July September S MT W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 29 30 31 30 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2:00 PM City 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM Energy/ Council Meeting Pena Envi-Sniff 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V. Safety -Perkins Mosquito Abate. 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins -Perkins 6:00 PM League of Cities-Riv.Div. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9:00 AM CVB- 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM LAFCO- Henderson Human/Comm- Henderson 2:00 PM City Adolph Council Meeting 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson 26 27 28 29 30 31$ 2:30 PM RCTC 7:00 PM Planning Budget -Pena Commission , 6:00 PM CVAG- Meeting''' Exec Com-Pena Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 8/14/2001 5240, September 2001 Monthly Planner 3 4 City Council Meeting - Cancelled Labor Day (City Hall Closed) Labor Day Holiday 5 6 7 10:00 AM ALRC 12:00 PM Mayors Lunch 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V. Safety -Perkins Mosquito Abate. 12:45 PM -Perkins Transp.- Perkins 7:00 PM Planning 6:00 PM League Commission of Cities-Riv.Div. Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services 9:00 AM League of Cities- Riverside Div. 9:00 AM RCTC- Pena 5:30 PM Invest- ment Advisory Board 12:00 PM Energy/ Envi-Sniff 7:00 PM Cultural Arts Commission Commission ea ue o a i . hies nnua on erence - Sacramento 16 17 118 19 20 121 122 2 9:00 AM CVB- 7:00 PM Joint 3:30 PM Historic Henderson City Council/ Preservation 2:00 PM City Planning Commis Commission Council Meeting sion Public Hear- ing - General Plan 24 25 26 2:30 PM RCTC 5:00 PM Special 9:00 AM CVAG Budget -Pena Joint City Coun- Human/Comm.- 6:00 PM CVAG- cil Meeting with Adolph Exec Com-Pena Commissions/ 4:00 PM DRRA Boards Airp-Henderson 7:00 PM Planning Commission Meeting S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 27 9:00 AM LAFCO- Henderson S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 8/15/2001 523- October 2001 Monthly Planner .. ... .. .. .. .. .. . . 1 2 3 4 5 6 2:00 PM City 10:00 AM ALRC Council Meeting 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V., 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM Energy/ Safety -Perkins Mosquito Abate. Pena Envi-Sniff 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins 5:30 PM Invest- 7:00 PM Cultural -Perkins 7:00 PM Planning ment Advisory Arts Commission 6:00 PM League Commission Board of Cities-Riv.Div. Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 9:00 AM CVB- 3:30 PM Historic Henderson Preservation 2:00 PM City Commission Council Meeting 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2:30 PM RCTC 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM LAFCO- Budget-Pena Commission Human/Comm- Henderson Meeting Adolph 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson 28 29 30 31 6:00 PM CVAG- Exec Com-Pena September November 0 M T W T F S SM T WT F SDaylight Savings Halloween 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 r3023 Time Ends 10 11 12 13 14 15 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 8/14/2001 524 �a��''u"r'Q•c DEPARTMENT REPORT: 3--5 Qum& o V G� OF 9w TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members Of the City Council FROM: June Greek, City Clerk DATE: August 21, 2001 SUBJECT: Vacancy on Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee As a result of the unfortunate and untimely death of Frank Reynolds, a vacancy has again been created on the ALRC. Council may wish to review the recently submitted applications for that Committee prior to advertising the opening. Attached are copies of the applications, submitted in June, for your review. 525 ATTACHMENT 1-B RECEIVED Z,0G 1 J0 = 4 PM 3: 4 8 CITY 0' LA QUINTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF LA QUINTA Date : � ev V opQ% APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE NAMEm Z.. a HOME ADDRESS: / (Must be a Lq Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (HOME) (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: ,.� �-��y9,etoS' Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. :F --O�-dm' f�Gr9/!✓ •gvoT 195-04-71 APPLICATION, ARCHITECTURAL &LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Commit`ee. lolss .daw . a 005z^.--0 What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? 10 ,00z' What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee? ��> �""® �...e.� •ti,�.� .Q� ��m �i �9 �" .tea -+�/� PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 527 «, ATTACHMENT 1-C RECEIVED Date MM 3 1 O H 12• Q 2 CITY 0;- L 4 p U I!W T Q CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY C!. ER I, S OFFICE APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE NAME: 01 E LLI�I �il�'Z HOME ADDRESS: � q I 'a•0 Cam} /SLTEIZIZ,A ,�IZ.I�/E� �. • ( (j (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: 1Z CT-11Z.I�3� TELEPHONE: (HOME) - lJ 0 % a„ 't7 0710 (BUSINESS) !'9'" IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 14 "If TZ-5I J? .3 -10-5 • Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. � �' � �v�► wiz v� q 33 A .. A'r- %Wj('J% 'Trl NE Z t=A %. E' 59h .5N ► i'"P'E3� �ro Nor D t..s$ 2 �� 15kZW+4hJ SEIZE' I�W LS 1J CS' eA� L+45 D • ;z ITANMX14 W k*P d6. 14 ) qSS I sJ 7#6 4A. 0 01 ► 04 ;:J zH -Do v4r, A L ct.AnnaNSA w O 1Z 'Ptl7D.c.� kk l n l?'k ." 'o rz.�V E w 52 APPLICATION, ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee. OP� A �-r • What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? Oy�! E � � IZO lJC1�1 � ►J��J `1'i What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee? 050 !tS&ttz ap W T- MIJ t i V 0 - C-:)("P M I M Aj _PG kb ► ►JC x4 S, r42 CA"rC- crt-v rz-Xt_.. - �►�� ,Jb '��.�1 r Ala_._ SG12.%1 114G 1 ?q1 MA419 c..�r�c,► rI O,J Wa;a Pt jM)0%JAr,, K1C-;:M1t 4"r Caj% -EL�'�., `a- �. ttS -f-2t �j''t- E S %30 -r-k r-Tl 1 /AkTLGY PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 5f)!) IS RECEIVED 2001 JUN - 5 Pik 3: 4 9 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CLEPWS OFFICE CITY OF LA QUINTA ATTACHMENT 1-D Date_ APPLICATION TO SERVE 'ON LA QUINTA ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE NAME:.'—� HOME ADDRESS: S 5 N '? -D ^ (Must be a Lac Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: �� Lc--- Gj-\ � V --, ; 1 TELEPHONE: (HOME)--)L333- 9 (BUSINESS) `� - U (s ) 1 � / IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: C u n �,,,n cal 0 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: I It 1 $ Z Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. U <-GVn aq 0" v� 4- 5p0 APPLICATION, ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 531 ATTACHMENT 1-E RECEIVED LY 3: 03 CITY OF LA 0UI'4T A CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF LA QUINTA Date APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE NAME: /'�� 1� '11 -(,-0- �f HOME ADDRESS: (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (HOME) :Z7/ - � 6�/ �/ (BUSINESS) _ IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 2 ��! , Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. 32 e • I. APPLICATION, ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE 2 A Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? ua e ® Pi 4•�.'G" c GLL� -GyrZ i�/V leg-14 What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you ink you hav which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT I 533 101, `�•c DEPARTMENT REPORT: 4- A O.I U - IvCoxeoa m4.�`� ' OF TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tom Hartung, Director of Building & Safety -.14. DATE: August 21, 2001 RE: Monthly Department Report - July 2001 Attached please find the statistical summaries for building permits, Animal Control, Code Compliance, and business licenses for the month of July. The reports depict the following highlights: • Year to date building permit valuation is $126,342,357.70 which represents an issuance of 2,129 building permits through July; • 1,870 animal control cases have been handled through July; • 1,682 code compliance cases have been initiated through July; • 9 new licenses were issued to La Quinta based businesses in July. 534 N N pp O .- N O O O O p O p O O O p O p O p O p O O O O O O O O O O O M et CO) O a) O 6q O (D O 69. O 69* O 6q O 64 O 6q O 69. O 60. O 6q O 6q O 6q O 611* O 64 O 69. O 6q O U) VQ gCIO co Go � m a 40 v J ma D (D Oo n O OO O O O O O O O O OO O n e, = 6q : U) o 6q 0 6q 0 6q 0 6q 0 6A. 0 6q 0 6f? 0 6q 0 6q 0 6q 0 6q 0 6q 0 6q o 6q w N Z O Ci Q O N O O O M 00 O In � In () O O In O t- cM O O O O LA O M O to � O Il- � a0 Il- a0 W) LO 1- O 6q rM t- M 00 1 r- e- 00 r- ti N O 1- O 't (D O Lb M r--� (D (A (ri LO N (D vi oo ti O ti M O N 613, et LO N 6q Ln M O 69, 00 O LO (D M 00 (A a) T- to Lo 69 C7 bq V O I 00 1-f N (O C'7 di ti y W O (M y� 64 � 6q 6q N L LL � F_- Ln T O O 00 (D O � O O O O O O LO M I- O O O 00 O 00 N I- In � O O 00 N 1� LO U') O 6q T- LO 14: O 00 00 e- I- (V LO 6 co LO v C7 N 1� co 0 00 [-_: (D O (f} (fl N (V � O cm d F- Z (D O N cM 6q (D 6q (4 (n Ef? O 64 ti N - (M 6q 00 co ' O oo O M `Ct Cq N 64 60q N 6q 6q 6q 6Mq � 69 iOR O O O qT O O U') e- O O O O O O O O O LO O O O O O O O U) O It O O O (D In T- O W) (� U) N LO LO O e- M Ln r- In ti �t 1` ti N N It O O 00 N O (D O 00 Cri T- V- (V 00 (" M N N p a)o o0 M 00 a) T- O O (M � N LO 00 W) QCO) G r (D 00 O r-- oD O Ln O (O 64 ti tl- r- 6q Ln 00 r, v N cD (O LO e- N ti T- '�f M 00 (D ' � it L<j � M ea ao Q J N (D (D O T- r- 6" LC) � Vj? f-- U) O �. 0 Z LO6M9 � 64 6�q 60qQOf 409- N -Q-+ W 0. J O J In O O O `� et I` 00 M O O O O O O (D (D O O O O O O O O 0)0 O O T- O (D CD P }O ('O T 64 O v O (D a) OCC) 0O LO O � co N CM V- � OD O O (D O (D U') W) Cl) F- Z O t- � ('M (D Ln N O N (� Q O G .-- (D M o0 Ln (D N lq;r V t- (D N l LO (D (V 00 N P- (D 1- 1- 0) M 00 LO (D N O T- rn Re N 00 69 6q 6�q 60q 6Mq 60q m 0) T- (7 6q 6q N r t- 6q 6q � Z O O ti O O O N O O N O O O O O O U) 00 O O O O O O O It O O O O O O O V �! (D O O cM V- T-: (OD U) o O (� U') c� 0 8 r-: O O O coo o0 (M (D (( i LO 0 0 N N co 0 F- Z Ln 00 M (0 Ln IC-T- O m T- O T- 00 LO a O Ln LO �- U') p 00 LO (� (D M � N (a (O o LO U')6q 64! 9 6 6q � bq 6q 6q I~ C6� N � 17 N 1- (N 00 (D 'cr T- 'a' 0)0 N 00 O 0).- 00 LO LO O 00 M 00 N LO I- N 1l- U*)N (M C M N � J W O to (D O 00 N M (D 00 1- 1- e- 00 I- (D M co Ln 00 v � v 0o N N LA O N (/� IL LO c- e1 T- N co LU J Z U W 0 0 W p Z O CD Go 0 ti N N (m CY) LO p 0 CL LV aZ j O w H M F->o�� U Q Q � w o O � >- Z O U J Q w 2 J -i g O Q J Q ZO w Z < U g O Q W U H J g Z_ Z Y N m m (D JW WJ W w wOW J Wa ZLL Z) O U -1 w O O 2 w 0 Q ix Q O(D Z O U)O w W p U m 0 w a a- IL O co U Ix of F- 53 ANIMAL CONTROL REPORT FOR: July, 2001 Steve Alexander (with Moises Rodarte) and Jackie Misuraca ANEVIAL PICKUPS YEAR TO YEAR TO July DATE 01 DATE 00 Dogs Alive 25 249 270 Dead 8 37 64 OTI 1 22 0 Cats Alive 47 137 93 Dead 5 40 49 Other Animals Alive 10 74 49 Dead 5 53 59 TOTAL ANIMALS INCIDENTS HANDLED July Bite Reports 1 Animal Trap YEAR TO YEAR TO DATE 01 DATE 00 20 15 Set Ups 12 55 48 Cruelty to Animals 0 7 9 Vicious Animal Restraining 0 0 1 Special Hour Patrols 17 71 Alive 82 460 412 Zoning Dead 18 130 172 Violations 0 14 OTI 1 22 0 Lost & Found 36 247 TOTAL ANIMALS REMOVED Animal Rescue 2 8 101 612 584 Outside Agency 0 0 City Reclaims 10 70 Other 23 118 TOTALS 101 610 VIOLATIONS: No Owner Warnings Citations Dogs at Large 25 0 22 Noise Disturbance 0 0 0 Defecation removal 0 0 0 License Violation 0 0 24 Other 0 0 0 Monthly Total 25 0 46 YEAR TO DATE 189 20 439 TOTAL MONTHLY INCIDENTS HANDLED: Jul 01- 273 / Jul 00 - 184 YEAR TO DATE INCIDENTS HANDLED: Jul 01 - L 870 / Jul 00 - 10571 n ., 195 24 13 59 117 584 0°'3 536 CODE COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR: July, 2001 July 01 YEAR TO DATE 01 YEAR TO DATE 00 ABATEMENTS: Nuisance Abatements Started 50 895 414 Weed Abatements Started 16 85 51 Vehicle Abatements - Started 67 697 621 Dwelling Abatements Started 0 5 59 TOTAL STARTED 133 1682 1145 TOTAL COMPLETED 168 1310 1482 Home Occupation Inspections 8 61 88 Business License Inspections 0 13 125 Garage sale permits Issued 112 884 908 537 r r r r r r r r r- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N m N (0 M O N N CO O NI ti ti P- P-I,- ti M ti ti 730 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w J atS w U U) Z z W a. W LU w Of 3 O it v w p 0 Q W Q m z W 2 Uw xU) w Z �of �CCHUmLu< (,)Qj u O 5_ z U a CLw�o0 vwQwJ�UZIQ- Z'O ZU�UZUQ�O LO M U') to U') Ln LO Lf) LO N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CA 0 0 0 0 M 0 C) O d W lQQQQQQQQQ >+ZzzzZzzZz �C1C�C�C�C�CIC�CIC1 0 O r w U) 0 w rz w J O C07 w W OLU p = z of w W w Q �Z� M. (1)0 w=<cU)z OmO JF—Z_OZ�a--Z Q O> X> uj 0 O Q> 'oUcAQ000Q �or--0Macoo0o cp O r 1� O u) V- C) �r00prrnvLn0 �°I�°LLili'"St fml- ncu'4) w �w = z H LLJ o U) O F O z w U) F- z Q O N p I— W Z F- o OHao~OE-Z� c� ��9ir-io�ZZ Fw-a��=�O QO cu 0O emaZozUOUpOcn «- O C (n O �- H� (n Z- o c N U Z =wz�ww�-w0 cim� B mmoaLLa-00 p O O r r M r d N C r M r O o 1� 00 O LO N N N O O co CDM 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 533 a�''`�•c DEPARTMENT REPORT: 5—� L� U -� rY _ a Ivco��„m,�4 ti OF T TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: JERKY HERMAN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Op DATE: AUGUST 21, 2001 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 2001 Attached please find a copy of the Community Development Report which outlines the current cases processed by staff for the month of July. 539 PAMonthly Department Report.wpd 1 Z W H Q CL it LU ZIL W W O aO Z N W W J W cc �a �. W H � Z D L) Z 0 — F— V Q z 0 H a C.) W 0 � N a E U O O N O O N 0 N O O N O N 0 N O + +_ *a +-a +-j +-+ +-i +- +-j +_� +-+ +-+ +-r 4 - +i +_� '+a U + # t +-i t +j t +-j +-+ a-i t +� +t N > cn O O O O > > O O O O O O O O O O N O N O N N LI) O LO c0 O O O O c0 N C- s + O p L O co cn C a N O +'' C U m V O .O C w E ca O W 7CD +-jN i p C � Q 0 0 � E a 0) o U cn n U > a N N O � ? rn c U) O + O C 0 p Q O a� O 5m 5ai Q a U E CO -c U Q m Q� > C cn 0 a) U O +L v v cv ! O a_ v ca c p ? a. cn> O p U- 'C O �> C C O > 0 N C (� a- LL U C � H U (n (n N w N p U N O a: 540 C 0 .� +' j ca 0 .Q C ca L--0 a� -C OC7 cn U U � N a- L E U > LLJ �' ° 0 co 0 cn +.i ca a0 c�� 0 cn L 0 -0 CL CL � Q=O= � wZLu 00 N 00 O �..1 > o U L/ U a o > Q C Qo Q U 00 r- NMI co r- 0) UUU �UU -p O O � > Q O 0 Q C a oQ N U O LO �� L/ 1� -�UU 0-a-CL N 0 a Q O r4%_ U �M C N 0 L U) 0 N C 0 O M � C 0-0 ca 0 J .0 C 0 0 .0 E 0 Q C CL Q .p O c� to �,, � •Q �,, N O O C i 0 i CC r- U U o O - a) c' 0) L co C o � N � � cn v E 'C � 0 c O> .n > 0 C "0 L >� 0 =_ cn as 0 -� 0 a E 0 N Lp ca '_ O N O m ca Q > s L N 0 "0 C O� 0 CL-0 Cl) Co '� L O cn j J 0 +'' C +_ 0 0 0 U —_ 0 0 0 L- i M '0 `� > 00 C Q ca 0 c D C 0 0 O `~ can C V cn C O cn 0 0' U C7 N 0 0 `�- n. co Q O E 0 ca -c N N aa)i ca Q a +_ F- � CO 0 0 o> o �- o o c •� N ccn c 0 0 •m c D C a' N E U 0- ca +--i Cn Q N E w• cm C N co a. a--' s 0 cn 0 c= 0 0 0 co Q -o ai "0 ' N CO FL 0 -0 00-0 �+- 0 + C C ca -0 r7 C COO. L C 0 0 C -p .i L O y c — c �O 0 L co O C 0 O = Lid 0 CO +� C7 c ' n _ � .� E 'N +; Q o- 0 -0 > "v -a co U 0 0 0 Vi 07 N 0 Cl) 0) 0 L ca U co 0 ,C .� L O 4- CO _ Co ca U E LO •X O c U co " 0 Q --0Q con c 0 O •, o(n cn 0 0 0� •- 0 co L +.r 0 cnM L -o `r' .o ' > o �2 •o C a � +., '+_� +� 4- -j +., o cn O cn ca — C— Q- L 0 CD L 'o w 0 0CL 0 N 0 0 0 cnCL ca 0 cr E 0 0 0 (n 0 := o d a M?cr •C C 0 OCR +, L ca cnQ-Q L �I-� 0 0 2U 0 oC�Q 0 0 1=N cn 0 CC , M 0 U W 0 00 U 'V O _J N C �,_. r- � cn co- a_ � W Z O C 0 M 0 L � No r' co o d CO co a) N X c � Cfl Cfl C C N O O Cl) 0 c Q CY)� >, co o oQ O — I ca (0 C:)N OCL a o0 000 0= cn 0� LC N N N O o c +-j � 0= Q e- 4-1 C 'O Q V Q p C N N a_ 0 M O n- O D 0 U) C7 O N C7 N (n s U> M 0 541 �' > > O o Q Q ' or n n UU a. U LC) �� U 0 U Q a. c0 .- 0 0 UU a_ U O a E 0Q c O v CL Q O> U a o > Q Q O o- a 0 N U -ja.0 Q 2 a. O O L. a > Q O Q a .- N U U Q a. cn >� C cn O� C O O U_ }' 0) O C C" cy 0 C O C C cy m O a) N C( }; m J cn L C O a) C o •O U cn Q. O -a a_ a) Q. a_ m c O a) co J Q L O C) 4= E- � -c0 O U O `{- CD L- U U O +.' O N -p C O +-i O(0 O M N O a) C y,. O O C a O •�- o C +., U` +.+ m -c +-, +. N U L U L C -a r- Co U Ln Q 0 C7 C O cn o •+-j � O M L `� O O N O 2 "a - O > C -O M U a) O c0 c i O N :E r i }' O n CO a) " a) O +., C C cv Q c p O N ° ° cn co ' ' C m cv ° d7 U 0 U 4- E U C `- 0 0 J= 0 O r- E O O O C C C U O .a n C 0 U ° ° .0 O ° O Z a) C C Co L •C O U O C •C 'a a) +-' Q C_ .O C -0 C � � O CO o U) CC c a) a L }+Uc O r c U Q -aU) +- L C C� J U) U)a) cnOO +j E CO0 • a C C E C N O COO U C c- m Ln m-0 a cn c0 Q O •O 0) o cr cX C c n , m > a) � C � a+.1 C MC 0 Q a 0 - +, U O" m O C a) > c O O > +� NO cc �o E (n U On � o oo-a) +-, c� a) U° CIL E•a o O� }' ) a L- M o ' �o `UC) c o a) O � C 4--4--Q O.0 O O� �O C E E N 4- C OCO C •ONJc > U) W � m cn • m O a) O c � cr E �W >Qco c O N .� + •0 C° •_ c a) U ..► O O> ` '"") > C Q O a) J U cc 'D �-, Cn a) X "a N O O -0 N O Ir O° 4- E +-, C� O 4- %+- co J Cn Y Q Q r- ui w CO +-,1 X N M 0 ' Lu O p N O p N O O O U U N N U a_ m Ln rn C 0 CD o cn r Ln o C o a) o c0 o O O O ° O O J O� O C 0 0 0 N a) F— 0 a) N O N M N M O NO N d a. a. c Q L- . 06 Q- U) (n a._ _ U) 02 C70U 01— Q CJL 54 2 Ei 0 a: C c E E v L- 0 O L a a Q O CL 1 N C) '� 0 _ L a) 0 > U O Q O CLa) a Q `- N N r, 00 CL U d' `- N N r, 00 a- U (M 00 cc a) _ v' 0,., U 00 N 00 CL 00 00 (V 00 a)U CL U O) M Q CL LO co cV U 00 Q CL U O O Cl) .0 O O - O O 00 L +-+ :t ca 0,� E� -00Q cn p C v ^a) c� cn ,� 0 0 O o � •c L E C C O W V) �1 W O U � L > •a) •E .0 a) a C 0 O C > ca Q +� a) 0 0 _ C U + U O � +� 0 C. U m O a) C U E co L O C O O U O Lo 0 itco CO cn cn > a) L- C .0 Q O _ L ca O (n O O U F' a) cc fl- j a) O L- C O C O U U > L O O O +� a) a) > s +� co C O O_ N .0 +1 0 Co +; O" 0 (� M� O 'C a 0 +� U O '+� co +, O> L 0 `'"' '+ j N U LO *'' U L D • Lo 00 N (/) co O C ,�_ O N a O co 'L- O N U) C C i 0 U) C O p ca r- -a C _ .O 4- O C .0 ca _ In F- O p — ca C G > C cn 0 0 a) cn -a O "v L Q O> O p) a> O U 0 Z O O U U c0 0 > N +•� +� �. L c -0U) a) J O '� CL L O 0 O •}, cn O to O O M' .- i O O= cn O -p O C M C i� 0 a O C C O D a L O O� 0. ca C .N 0 CCL O 0 'a C a L O+J •` �- a *� 0) c 0 U �� 06 0 L� 0 M O cn '+_� W O D U J 0 a) N c O C ca �- _O Q > a) a) E O C C O O O 0 M +-� ca _0 +-� 00 (� O cu +.r 0� C o o C C X C C O C a C e p %+- O U 0 C +- C +- O U 0 .N U -0 +0 0 p O M O �' 0 C In O 0 a) +-' O C 'O U a) O cn .; O ` V a) O +� C) •� =p c �_ +0, "O O O O O C "O a) O a) C .0 � m > a� � Q Q E cn 0 Q .E i.0 U) n Q Q �a 0 co O to cn a) O a) 0ca r= a) 00 (n C7 0 Q) .� N o ° Cl) CN U -o C d � a?S CL 0 j co a) E J o c Q c C > — C E -O % a) Q M co 00 E Q a) co E E CN co co N ' -0 c >. d E +t 0 O Q ' O O ' I-�: O DO CV) N � �j r- U _ O O I. CM Q M CO CO N� M O N •- O O C O O O O 0 N N L 00 s a. N }' J 0- M a_ CL a O F- N CL r to C 0 � p Co1 (n -j U) F- F- F- 0)>e f- U F- cn F- U W) 543 N V d LO � UO cr Q-j a- _N a E O U c LO c O U•2 oC a QQ Ln �� .-- UO oC ' U QCL CC) CO N � CO 0) ' ' U CLU CD CU N O a ? � •C O O cn +-' d > o co L O O p o a a) a> 0 o ,0 L co L c co a) co Q O O Q (1) O O c co L Cl) p (n M LO co O a Er O `'." N 0-0 aD O O a) cn -p c c c O O •> O O co •o a) CO E In% cYi o L a) N a cn N co -0 > C' c O C cu � co L � U > O > o rnco _ _ oa) 4-1 0o° c O > O c c a) anO _c 0 co +ra + co cc >O C 0 � N (, C 'O W C a N _ CL O co a— O N O L �- L U CL O > a) M L O O U O O •O .� co C a c (n O Oem v CD cn .� 0 Q •E E '� 00 '� a) 0 0 OC cn 16 Q -0�-. x -0 U CC co c � O 0 U cn c N L J c 000 0 Y ccnn c c o E LO Co O = E O Q Q -v 00 M C a) O cn O p O 00 N co (6 N N N Q CL U M a. CL 2 o0 0 CL J U)� F— cfl V O Cd A 0 544 O IL W X ch F- Q F— F— V W n O cc CL J Q V W a. O N p 0 pp �p O O a� U 75 tt ^ c0 00 O as y +• a ca G o � 0 0 O Lo O O m O ^ Ln n 0 'n O O Ln O 0 ': o 0 o o E M O O 0 to O J be b. O 4- W H V 0 bm a c a a CD 0 _ a .a 0 c 0 ao a �v w +r ea (D a O c M D o`0c = a° c ea 0 s c ca 0 t M m oc m C7 Q W V W C a 0 as 4) O V Y c as c as c a� c O t0 y O U c 0 V �0 v �= c a E a E a 540 F E� a�''`�•c DEPARTMENT REPORT: lo 'A 444 - Irvco L91C rm 44 OF 9�v TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY CO NCIL FROM: DODIE HORVITZ, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTO DATE: AUGUST 21, 2001 SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 2001 UPCOMING EVENTS OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER 2001: Sept 1 La Quinta Golf Tour, Desert Dunes Sept 8 La Quinta Summer Golf Tour Banquet, Desert Willow Golf Resort Sept 10 *Monthly Putting Contest Sept 11 *Free Blood Pressure, Glucose and Cholesterol Screening Sept 12 *Dispute Resolution Seminar Sept 13 *Fiesta Luncheon Sept 13 *Free Legal Consultation Sept 15 Excursion to Raging Waters in San Dimas Sept 17 Beginning Computers, Boys & Girls Club Sept 17 Classic Ballroom Dance, La Quinta High School Sept 18 *CPR Class Sept 18 *Free Hearing Consultation Sept 18 Conversational Italian for Travelers, Senior Center Sept 18 Learn to Draw, Senior Center Sept 19 Intermediate Computers Sept 19 Latin Ballroom Dance, La Quinta High School Sept 20 *Free Medical and Insurance Counseling Sept 20 *Healthy Cooking Class Sept 20 Creating a Family Memoir Sept 21 *Free HI -CAP Counseling Sept 25 Stress Management Workshop, Senior Center Sept 26 Investments in Stocks, Senior Center Sept 27 *AARP Mature Driver's Course Sept 27 *Palm Springs Aerial Tram Trip Sept 29 Mastering Microsoft Word, Boys & Girls Club Sept 30 Adult Soccer Fall League Begins, La Quinta High School * Senior Center Program, Class or Event 546 T a 4ht 4 4 QUA& Community Services Department Attendance Report for the Month of July 2001 Summary Sheet Program 2001 2000 Variance Meetings Per Month 2001 2000 Leisure Classes 159 27 132 17 3 Special Events 249 85 164 6 2 Adult Sports 152 704 -552 11 12 Senior Center 1308 1214 94 82 73 Total 1868 2030 -162 116 90 Senior Services Senior Center 578 511 67 28 21 Total 578 511 67 28 21 Sports Complex Use LQ Baseball Assoc. 900 750 150 20 15 Total 900 750 150 20 15 Total Programs 1 31346 31291 55 164 126 Volunteer Hours Senior Center 729 658 71 Meals on Wheels 63 60 3 Total Volunteer Hours 792 718 74 Monthly Revenue Senior Center $ 3,846.00 $ 2,548.00 $ 1,298 Community Services $ 4,533.00 $ 4,296.00 $ 237.00 Rental Income $ 2,025.00 $ 1,009.00 $ 1,016.00 Total Revenue $ 10,404.00 1 $ 7,853.00 1 $ 2,551 Revenue Year to Date Senior Center $ 3,846.00 $ 2,548.00 $ 1,298.00 Community Services $ 4,533.00 $ 4,296.00 $ 237.00 Rental Income $ 2,025.00 $ 1,009.00 $ 1,016.00 Total Revenue to Date 1 $ 10,404.00 1 $ 7,853.00 1 $ 2,551.00 544 602 Community Services Program Report for July 2001 2001 2001 2000 2000 2001 2000 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Meetings Meetings Leisure Classes Latin Ballroom Dance 13 13 0 0 13 1 0 Microsoft Access 5 5 0 0 5 1 0 Beginning Computers 6 24 9 27 -3 4 3 Italian for Travelers 13 65 0 0 65 5 0 Drawing 15 30 0 0 30 2 0 Summer Art Blast 1 7 14 0 0 14 2 0 Summer Art Blast 2 4 8 0 0 8 2 0 Totals 631 1591 91 27 132 17 1 3 2001 2001 2000 2000 2001 2000 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Meetings Meetings Special Events Golf Tour, Desert Willow 36 36 0 0 36 1 0 Golf Tour, Pete Dye 56 56 41 41 15 1 1 Golf Tour, Sun City 52 52 0 0 52 1 0 Golf Tour, Cimarron 48 48 0 0 48 1 0 Beach Train Trip 35 35 44 44 -9 1 1 San Diego Zoo 22 22 0 0 22 1 0 Totals 249 249 85 85 164 6 2 2001 2001 2000 2000 2001 2000 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Meetings Meetings Adult Sports Open Basketball M/T 32 32 64 64 -32 10 8 Adult Soccer League 1 1201 1201 1601 640 -5201 1 4 Totals 1 1521 1521 2241 704 -5521 ill 12 Recreation Totals 1 4641 560 941 816 -256 34 17 Page 2 543 i1 C1 3 Senior Center Attendance 2001 2001 2000 2000 Enistered TotalRegistered Total Meetings Participants articipation Participants Participation Variance 2001 2000 Senior Activities Ballroom Dance, Complimentary 8 8 0 0 8 1 0 Bono's Mobile Office 3 3 6 6 -3 1 1 Bridge, ACBL 78 78 94 94 -16 3 4 Bridge, Duplicate/Social 297 297 332 332 -35 14 14 Excursion -Palm Springs Tram Trip 26 26 39 39 -13 1 1 Ice Cream Social 24 24 55 55 -31 5 5 Monthly Birthday Party 35 35 18 18 17 1 1 Monthly Luncheon 115 115 52 52 63 1 1 Movie Time 60 60 70 70 -10 4 8 Putting Contest 7 7 6 6 1 1 1 Senior Activity Total 653 653 672 672 -19 321 36 Senior Leisure Courses Ballroom Dance 10 29 14 50 -21 3 4 Ceramics 10 34 12 34 0 4 4 Computer 16 16 21 21 -5 3 4 Cooking 17 17 5 5 12 1 1 CPR Class 7 7 7 7 0 11 1 Exercise 47 408 53 363 45 12 16 Senior Leisure Courses Total 107 511 112 480 31 24 30 Senior Leisure Classes Bridge Lessons 17 17 0 0 17 2 0 Computer Tutor 3 3 0 0 3 1 4 Creative Writing 9 9 0 0 9 4 0 Golden Tones 56 56 40 40 161 4 3 Quilting 23 23 22 22 1 4 0 Rug Hooking 16 16 0 0 16 4 0 Tai Chi 10 10 0 0 10 3 0 Woodcarving 10 10 0 0 10 4 0 Senior Leisure Classes Total 144 144 62 62 82 26 7 TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAMS 904 1308 846 1214 94 821 73 Senior Services A.A.R.P. "55 Alive" 52 52 30 30 221 2 2 Ambassadors 53 53 55 55 -2 n/a n/a FIND Food Distribution 310 310 347 347 -37 4 4 Health Screenings 13 13 30 30 -17 1 2 HEAP Utility Program 18 18 0 0 181 2 0 Hearing Consultation 2 2 0 0 21 1 0 Homeowner/Renter Rebate 40 40 12 12 28 4 5 I. I. D. Energy Assist 74 74 23 23 51 8 5 I. I. D. Energy Assistance/No fee 5 5 0 0 5 21 n/a Legal Consultation 2 2 8 8 -6 2 1 Medicare Consultation 7 7 0 0 7 1 n/a Share Meetings/Sign-up 2 2 6 6 -41 1 2 TOTAL SENIOR SERVICES 578 578 511 511 67 28 21 SENIOR CENTER TOTAL 1482 1886 1357 1725 161 110 94 Page 3 54 0 4 DEPARTMENT REPORT: (0 - 5 4 e y�� OF TNty T0: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: DODIE HORVITZ, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECT DATE: AUGUST 21, 2001 SUBJECT: 20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION COMMITTEE REPORT The 201h Anniversary Celebration Committee has begun planning the activities for the City's 201h Anniversary Celebration. Three meetings have taken place: July 16, July 30 and August 13. Attachments 1 and 2 are minutes from the first two meetings. The Committee is awaiting the additional members to be selected by the Arts Foundation and the City's Commissions/Boards/Committees. Due to many of the City's Commissions/Boards/Committees being dark in August, the selection of members will take place in September. It is anticipated that at the next meeting on September 24, all members will be present. The City Council had suggested that the 201h Anniversary Celebration Committee be comprised of the following members: Two Council Members (Terry Henderson and Ron Perkins) Two Members Historical Society (Barbara Irwin and Pat Cross) Two Members Chamber of Commerce (Kurt Spurgin and KimBerly Keyton) Two Members LQ Arts Foundation ( To be named) One Member Cultural Arts Commission (Rosita Shamis) One Member Community Services Commission (To be named) Two Members comprised of members from the City's various Commissions/Boards/Committees (To be named) However, after the second meeting of the Committee, the Committee felt that a representative from KSL should be a member of the 20th Anniversary Celebration Committee, due to KSL's involvement with the community. The Committee recommended that one member be selected from the City's various Commissions/Boards/Committees and the additional member be solicited from KSL to participate in the planning and implementation of the activities. S:\Community Services\CCReports\20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION REPORT.wpd 550 Listed below are the tentative activities being planned for the weekend of April 25-28: Thursday April 25 Chamber Mixer hosted by the City of La Quinta City Hall Courtyard Friday April 26 Multi -generational Talent Show 6:30-9:00 p.m. La Quinta Senior Center Saturday April 27 Parade: Theme- La Quinta, Gem of the Desert, "Shining Brighter Than Ever!" Bermudas to Frances Hack Park 10:00-1 1:00 a.m. Community Picnic 1 1:00- 2:00 p.m. Fritz Burns Park Arts and Crafts Show 1:00-4:00 p.m. La Quinta Senior Center Cove Oasis Trail Hike 5:30-6:30 p.m. Cove Oasis Trailhead Star Gazing 8:30-9:30 p.m. Cove Oasis Trailhead Fishing Derby 10:00 P.M. to Lake Cahuilla County Park 10:00 a.m. Sunday April 28 5k/10k Run 7:00-9:00 a.m. Fritz Burns Park Fishing Derby 10:00 a.m. Lake Cahuilla County Park Art Show 12:00-4:00 p.m. LQ Arts Foundation Site Concert/Fireworks 6:00-9:00 p.m. La Quinta High School The Committee will work on finalizing activities and venues for each, as well as an estimated budget for each activity. It is anticipated that co-sponsors will be found for the fireworks show to be held Sunday, April 28, 2002. S:\Community Services\CCReports\20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION REPORT.wpd 5 51 L.V21 ATTACHMENT 1 20T" ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES July 16, 2001 11:00 a.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Terry Henderson, Council Member Ron Perkins, Council Member STAFF PRESENT: Dodie Horvitz, Community Services Director Marni Francisco, Recreation Supervisor BUSINESS ITEMS A. Logo for Event: Council Member Henderson suggested that the 20t' Anniversary Celebration should have a distinct logo. Council Member Perkins suggested updating the 10' Anniversary Celebration logo. Staff will contact Mark Palmer, who designed the 10tn Anniversary Logo to see if the logo can be updated. B. City Picnic: The Community Picnic will be held on Saturday, April 27, 2002 at Fritz Burns Park with the same format as in the past: vendors, free food, free swimming, games, birthday cake, City hand-outs. The Picnic hours are tentatively set for 1 1 :00-2:00 p.m. C. Parade: The topic of a City sponsored parade was discussed. It was determined that staging the parade on Eisenhower, with the parade route down Bermudas would work well for spectators, with the end of the parade at Frances Hack Park. Parade participation will be limited to local participants only (Coachella Valley). Parade hours will be 10:00-1 1:00 D. Fireworks: It was discussed that the City sponsor a portion of the fireworks show and solicit co -sponsorships from local businesses to offset the cost. The amount of $5,000 was suggested as the City's contribution towards the fireworks. Possible venues for the fireworks show: Fritz Burns Park Civic Center Campus Arts Foundation Site La Quinta High School Lake Cahuilla Staff will get preliminary costs for fireworks, site requirements, safety personal and site charges for the next meeting. It was discussed that entertainment be provided at the fireworks show, and possibly Marty Langer could be contacted regarding providing such. Council Member Perkins will contact Mr. Langer for information, then staff will arrange the final details. The hours of the evening festival and fireworks show would be 5:00-10:00 p.m. 552 S:\Community Services\20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATIONWEETING MINUTES 07-16-01.wpd E. It was discussed of possibly having a "Gem of the Desert" triathlon on Sunday, April 28 at Fritz Burns Park. Staff will contact the company that coordinates these events for more details. F. Theater Production: It was discussed that a theatrical production using young children could be offered at the Senior Center on Friday, April 26. Staff will coordinate this event. G. Fishing Derby: It was discussed that a Fishing Derby could be held at Lake Cahuilla. Staff will contact Lake Cahuilla for additional details. H. Committee Members: The Committee members reviewed the minutes of the July 3 City Council meeting regarding the appointment of members to the Committee. It was determined from the minutes that one Commissioner from the Community Services Commission and Cultural Arts Commission should be selected. It was also determined that there are two spaces available that can be filled with members from the Investment Advisory Board, Planning Commission, Historic Preservation Commission, and the Architectural and Landscape Review Board. It was also determined that two members from the following organizations will be solicited: La Quinta Arts Foundation, La Quinta Chamber of Commerce and the La Quinta Historical Society. Staff will send out letters requesting a confirmation of Committee members by July 17, with a response date no later than July 27. The Commission members will have to be selected at the next regularly scheduled meeting of each respective Commission. IX. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 12:05 p.m. NEXT MEETING DATE, TIME July 30, 11:00 a.m. La Quinta Civic Center West Conference Room S bmifed by: Dodie Horvitz, fCoipmunity Services Director 553 S:\Community Services\20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION\MEETING MINUTES 07-16-01.wpd ,0 T0 ATTACHMENT 2 4ht 4 4 Q" 20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES July 30, 2001 11:00 a.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Terry Henderson, Council Member Ron Perkins, Council Member STAFF PRESENT: Dodie Horvitz, Community Services Director Marni Francisco, Recreation Supervisor BUSINESS ITEMS; Calendar of Events: Friday, April 26 Saturday, April 27 Sunday, April 28 Multi -generational Talent Show Parade Community Picnic Arts and Crafts Show Cove Oasis Trial Hike Star Gazing 5k/10k run Fishing Derby Fireworks/Concert Senior Center Bermudas to Frances Hack Park Fritz Burns Park Senior Center Cove Oasis Cove Oasis Fritz Burns Park Lake Cahuilla To Be Determined A. Logo for Event: After reviewing the proposal from Mark Palmer, the Committee suggested that Kiner/Goodsell be contacted regarding designing a special logo for the 20tn Anniversary. Staff will check on this for the next meeting. B. City Picnic: The Community Picnic's entertainment will be community groups doing performances, such as the Boys and Girls Club, High School performance clubs, etc. The groups that participate in the theater production the night before will not be allowed to participate in the Community Picnic entertainment. C. Parade: A theme will be selected by the City Council for consideration once the Committee provides two alternatives for the Council's review. The Committee recommended a theme centered around La Quinta being a community for everyone. Staff will provide some concepts for the next meeting. Once a theme has been selected, a Grand Marshall will be invited to participate in the parade. D. Fireworks: It was discussed that the fireworks be presented on Sunday, April 28 as a finale to the weekend events. It was also discussed that there be columns of fireworks surrounding the stage where a patriotic musical theme can be presented. Staff will check into the requirements for this type of fireworks display. Mr. Langer is to present the S:\Community Services\20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION\MEETING MINUTES 07-30-01.wpd 554 C,0b Committee with a proposal to provide entertainment for the event. E. 5K/10K Run: Staff is continuing to check into the details of the run, and the cost of producing such. The Committee agreed that the City does not have the staff to produce the run, and therefore the company must provide all the aspects of the run. F. Theater Production: The Senior Center will host the Multi -generational talent show on Friday night for all ages. More details to come at a later day. G. Fishing Derby: The Committee agreed that it would be best if Lake Cahuilla would host the fishing derby as a co-sponsor with the City. Staff will gather additional details for the event. H. Committee Members: The La Quinta Chamber of Commerce has appointed Kurt Spurgin and KimBerly Keyton to the committee. The members of the Historical Society include Pat Cross and Barbara Irwin. The La Quinta Arts Foundation will appoint members at their September meeting. The Cultural Arts Commission appointed Rosita Shamis to the committee. The Community Services Commission will appoint a member at their September meeting. Two additional members will be selected from the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee, Historical Preservation Commission, Investment Advisory Board and the Planning Commission. All of the members should be appointed by the end of September. Once all the names have been submitted, a meeting will be held with all members in attendance. I. General Topics: The idea of a "Passport" type activity, in which people gather tickets or stamps from each location and turn them in at the Fireworks show for a drawing was discussed. Staff will present some ideas at the next meeting. Staff will check with Desert Sands Unified School District regarding the date of their "Ovations" program, so that it does not conflict with the Community weekend. Staff will provide an update on the 20' Anniversary Committee's progress through a staff report at the August 21 City Council meeting. IX. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 12:05 p.m. NEXT MEETING DATE, TIME August 13, 3:00 p.m. La Quinta Civic Center West Conference Room N oty: Dodie Horvgz,Aernrnunity Services Director 555 S:\Community Services\20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION\MEETING MINUTES 07-30-01.wpd a''u"`�•c DEPARTMENT REPORT: (o—C 0 0� INcoxroM OF TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY CO NCIL FROM: DODIE HORVITZ, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIREC DATE: AUGUST 21, 2001 SUBJECT: LETTER RECEIVED REQUESTING ACKNOWLEDGMENT FOR A CITIZEN OF LA QUINTA The City has received a request for acknowledgment of Mr. Fred Wolff along the Bear Creek Trail or another park -like area in the City as provided in Attachment 1. A committee has been formed to develop the criteria for the Acknowledgment Areas designated as part of the Civic Center Campus. It may be appropriate to consider this request as part of the Civic Center Campus Acknowledgment Areas once the criteria have been established. The City Council may wish to direct staff to present this request for consideration once the criteria have been formally adopted by the City Council, or the City Council may provide staff with alternative direction regarding this request. SACommunity Services\CCReports\REQUEST FOR ACKNOWLEDGMENT.wpd 556 Kay Wolff P.O. Box 1016 La Quinta, CA 92253 July 27, 2001 Members of the La Quinta City Council City of La Quinta, California Dear Councilmembers, JUL 2 7 �:1 Fred will be celebrating his 80th birthday at the end of August. It would be fitting, I believe, if the City would name some park -like area for him, in recognition of his leadership role in forging our cityhood, and his ongoing struggles for the future of the La Quinta and its residents. Fred loves the bike path, and would eventually like his ashes to be scattered in the vicinity (a legal question to pursue elsewhere, I believe). Way back, he was successful in salvaging a wilderness portion of the wash when CVWD was constructing the storm channel. I would like to request that some area of the bike path be named for him. I know the Council and the Wolffs don't always agree, but it is pretty certain, that if Fred hadn't been the visionary that he is, and taken the reins over 20 years ago, there would not be a City of La Quinta. The "four corners" (Hwy 111 and Washington) would have been immediately annexed by Indian Wells, thereby eliminating any hope of financial independence. Indio, then would have taken a swathe to the west, as would Coachella, which would now be my own address. Agree or disagree with Fred now, he was there when he was needed. We all carry the torch that -he lit.... There does not need to be any hoopla about this, and I will not ask again. No one (certainly not Fred) knows I'm making this request. Please do the right thing. Feel free to contact me if you wish by email (Kaywolff@msn.com)- or at 564-4070. If this could be accomplished in his lifetime, it would be wonderful. Sincerely, Kay Wol Cc: Dodie Horwitz, Director of Community Services 557 ( 0 j �a��•c DEPARTMENT REPORT: 4 O� �p Incoxrow+TID ti OF T TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Chris A. Vogt, Public Works Director/City Engineer q,A DATE: August 10, 2001 RE: Public Works/Engineering Department Report for the Month of July, 2001 Attached please find the following: 1. Summary of Citizen Request reports received; 2. Summary of Graffiti reports received; 3. Plan Check Applications received; 4. Encroachment Permits received; 5. List of Capital Improvement Project status. Chris A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer TAPWDEPT\C0UNCIL\2001 \0108Dept.wpd 55 ATTACHMENT 1 W co:w OD co w O co w co co m. CD, co m co W -.4 w co w m W � cocow co W � W CD co N N N ! O fr -' fr 0 - -: v N m : cn CD N A co 0 O co W co O N' OD: N -I V ? 0 fD' W co 4 -4 00 -4 0 _O o 0 C) O ... -4. - fr 0)w Lv N C) .. o o : o C) o o 0 0 . o o 0 c 0 (D 0 0 cD : 0 0 0, o cn cn 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o' 0 C)o 0 0 0 m. cl) . obi ` ...... o a). m` c- CD m .., c _ m` .. CD... ` r CD m m m m Q. fD CD CD L fD ` O O 7 N n N n N d N n d D = CD CD (D T� N CD 7 7 N Z N cl) CD cr N N CD N -n X °. v .. . D Z Z C7 � G)C� 0 o o mn� v o mom � n � _ Z .,.. m m o � U) o mCD n r2' co m 7 2 c _ o s U) < O m -- m _co o n O �' c m' (0 N N Co CD CD T Sm S : Cn n ° m ° =, fn FT<' Z - N n fn m CD m ° a o rn Xco cu 0 o c.c ,(o r'... 0m.. -4 =.�E ....cn:-r a r� m Z g y m 3 0 env m3 m W ° m WG7� a) c ° m ZOo D3 a3 a o o m Z� ni �_ �� vrm 0)° � C n) a CD �?? m ° c7°' ° 3 m fn m m� am 3 fn s .� CL m (D �. ° n� m� n' < N y -, 3 m CD m m "gym 0�,� ='d ° �° O N O �Q'm co �N n m 3 m �, 3_ N ��. rn 41 m N= ny -q " CD N N = y+ V C _ N C7 y Y j a Cc D n y C_ �j y. C C; V7 V= °m=u) a_v� cn� Qm N= N m N. N � O n O fn = O fA m ag m c n ::r m m n C y = -, y � m m to � 7 to d= O O J N m (/) O° fC �c cDic �.. CD m< _= J O O N] = O ?1 N (Q= y Q �' CCD m°o CD d fQ = C :3 D p -01 O— O N N , CD CD 0 (D 3 fn m fn C N co y N 0 0 p=j 7 d j N m _0 O m Q_ ° o m N O�-� d fn 0 _a (Dm0 = m C C 7 o 0 :' °'0 cr n'�= `�O O H O n = fn O m m J fn CD � 0� ' m � N d m � m = �v: gy 77_' �.D :3 -, � _ = a c amp= < m 3. O'D c w � m 5 co -`� f=n 0 n= � W °CD a m d m� fn CD CD v .° 7 CDn =O co n _ Cl)mN •v C CD 0 'Oz N on) v 3 N N N y CO � C m0 _ pOj d b i �= -0� fp) O= f. m fn /� �' m d = 3 nD �"� �Tp�O CD =m m°-' n _ mvc ° m n=3 °.<f ° m,= y -CD;1 o =a; nD 00:3=m �m CD 0) =?no "; n� ° �; vX=� fn'� ao � ,� =��?n � v m 0 nc � n C O :3 or CD :3 ,.CD - CDD = n. m Tn a? v << 3 n�:D 3 v D< v �; 2m ° nm O o m rao n o �:c 5L c O i o c m c CCL n 0 aD M °' v°'i �, v= fn 3 ^�_. �n "O� m �b3-cmo �.v)' ,i �m �, a-° 3 c u,m 3 y �.m y�� m = <_�_° m m 01< n M. m =�. 3 v eci' m 3 v a �� - v) = cb cn a• r =m 3 ° 3 S.fn a D v, m 5 n) m 3 ao m CD A CD 0 CC o � N > j m :3 � , � � n?i cn z ; N O D° TI = -„ =fQa �n?m8°'_ � �QoCDCLI O N< fn 0 m m j> ° _ c3 m3tn � _ U) �y - m �0D '= 3 n,m cX �_ �� m_ n O n N v,341g-�= m = fn. :3 m_ = �'c�_ <CD fn O n m CD i=m)fn��: O vF',o Ycov QD avz3 g °_� m m m' pfC 0 m5n' OL �v a�n�i � c d maim 3 m° m n 3 a°°' W, o) n _ = m _ ° 3.co = o ° D �, _ Q rt 3 s_N _ u m� o av,o n m `� m > > CC)CD > fo CD m fn m 0) °mo ai a= -' fn D m m O N- fn `< DJ m �. N O a Q. ° n f° co Sty S?o O O: 90 90 go Q° 90 go. to ' 0 0: O 0 O O 90 O 00 0 90 9 90 0 0' 0 90 0, 90 O 90 O go 90 O, 0 m' m XI 3' m'. z. v v W -4 0 0. -4-400 00 00 00 -4 OD: N -� ' O O O O O rn fn fr rn N fr 0)fD o. -400 fr C)... O w -40. O .. v v O -� O N C)o v. O cD v -� 0 v 0 0 v v O O rn rn X 0 0 � 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 O o o y; O r, m O O � O.. O O O O O m m 0.. �. m 0 0 0.. 0 0 0 0 O. 2 2 M. m 2 = 2 2 = r r = m m m m m m m m 2 m r m 2 = 2 m m m = m m m 2 m m = m m z z z -+ >' 0 002 W WW coW (� co:CA) co CA) CA) c0 co OD • co, c0 00 00 00 00 00 CID 00 cCil W W N Cn � N O — VW co ''. z'. m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o V V V V V V V -4V V V V V W, W: W' WN N N; N N Ni N. N: N V O CJI U1 CJI W W W O O O' Ot O% O' O: O O; O' O O' O O' m, CD CD, .... my C 0 v ov CD,... _ . oCD CD -.. CD CD CD Cl) CD CD c- CD ` CDCDN CDCD : CD CD CCD CD CD D cD CD CD ? CD m CD CD CD CD z N N N N', N W �i vOo :3c dCD 0 °' CCD 3 C p X m o tvCD <� o m �' CD o cn . A CD CD r > > > c s rn 0 CD CD Z CD cn CD y N T N N `< �< N a: rn 7 .a) cn -o -uo ° ° at cn O � -v....tn <...o D ....� a, v CO a) ; . ° -0 ? � A CD oo ° �. �v°vo =°moo°m c _v�5 cvm c m C CD m �. r. �gvo nv, c m CDnCO y 3 v Cr m� ° °n v 0 CD ° Q° °— m o o a m 2�� 5 n o CO m CAD xn m° Co Cr.. v M —'A �, � 5 c o Cp m �' o y CDm-timno m°iP°'—_ -* _—�m�0 (D CDCL oSc�?M.0 O� 0° Cl) 0 0 Cn cn n 0 N CD y° O Z CO (D O c N CD O b O cn N Z V Q N � O CD O CD a — '~D C ° 3 CD y p1 cD CD w — O ? lA � 7 ° .� d" CD ADO O—cn, n0 y 3 CD cn <i N N 3 -0 G O0< ° fD �� to n° v°i vom�o�' CD m�oQ o� <o m;X0 CD0°o',�,o x= oOL C CDN: m cn�_� �CD f Cl) y v no o ° o Z(D m 0 �: oc CD en 7) 0 CD u, CL �T-- cn m CD �o �i n°iy 7 �'; m D a o ono y n a v o '� m o �'CD 3 N-� C.. cc 01 CD mvn m?aB u ° O CD ? N ° n3 m m°CD Qc � CD as �D CD �, o n CL =L cn — CD CD W n Y CD n ° M, ° o CD CY �0 ° � m °� o.cc o' U' o- c n G) D 3 ,�' o 0) i D ON 0. cn ,�—v D' v,� BCD 3 m cr aT N o oc ° m v, ° m m o n`D �'sc<D > > o m CD ccD 3, � =r ; N a nm� 3 0 n mf ° @CCD� nc d v_ CD 3 c C s� Z o n O� 3 �' �� o m y y, o o n m o 0, O O O O ol 0 0, o, 0 ol O m'. m' D' m z 0 0 0` o coo 0 0• o 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 V V 00 CA)`V �, �, CD � W LTI O o O o 0 0, o 0 0• o CD o o' m', O r. m' I I n z'. 003 ATTACHMENT m X m X m z O G� mn m T O X I mn O X m ic O z O C. C r 0 O n m z O 0 0 cn cn m r n 0 z ic m n r n 0 X 0 n r G� mn 70 m m O �v mn O X C. C r N 0 0 561 004 ATTACHMENT 3 0 m -4 K) -4 - z � -4 N -4 N O C) U7 V O O O O O O OO O -A C D D_0 n n U' co co n z z O „ c c zu)0000 m z n n 00 m0 ��mc *� O r-r-r-AO m O O 0 U)U) K K W O O m m moo 0� -4wCACn O O N N CY)(D N -1 z O y D r- �= m 0 O r p 03 CO G) z z K X Z�-1 m m= D X n cn D O O � � _ n O O m cm00 D cn m m r > Z= rn rn O m K N N m cn m z� z D m D () X m r 0 r p C)my go>M C/) "D G) 0 D -0 cn � m o COO K c�i: n z m m z -� G) K D Z Z Z Z r .. cn cl w o 0 o m O O O O z z o 0 0 0 o D D o r a Z 0 m 0 a r 0 Ja i O ♦♦Z V/ X m n m C m v L C r N 0 56n 005 ATTACHMENT 4 C. V: O V7, O: V N W', O W O 0i V N O' OI V N `': V N A O O': -4 N �•._ O': -4 N O): O -4` N Ln Co O: O: O, OI W.. O'. N:_ O N W.. O': OI O': V: O O V O V! V CJ1 U1 O' O O! C,! O'.. OI OI co co O ': O. O CDA! O ' O ': V O O L7 O ; W O N (O co (O V co i cn '.: (O A (0 : W w w : N (O '.. O OD co OD ! OD m w X X D' n,, n v m 0 0 ccn � Or m �,, m N Z _. r<n N Z m. mM. ('' G7' m• - D cn z 0' 2 z' 0 m < m m ., r D -' � W m 00 ,. 00 cW C z 0 0 p z �, 0-4 .. vv �m v;u v m' p Z D' 0� m 0,' z, m G) z 0 p z '�'' C n_0 co z OD xn D m (n z n -i m, X � v n O' �. c G7 =O. Vmi n p m' = = � 0 O z x C p X D'; D D r r cf) 0 Tz, Om zZ Dz z' n, Z, x c 0 0 m c cn < m < m O: I.- D= G) -1 �. � 8 O C� c), G) 0 -n p; � m; __ � 7< c m Z c D r z W OD o m C p: G) O 0 Z v Z Z z; O 0 ; r O 0 O � � D r 2 Z Z O -q z m' O 0 r z 0 m c n D z 0 �, Z y v ,v- m, �' cn A, G) �' r z m z z v � v c ni W m m x m m c 0 0 c 0 z X :d m z G) m z c: mr cl) n'O coD3,: r m<D A- �(p .,9� u) �Ln V10D WD0 D0-N..`D Z<�z- m< -00Ul BCD 0' 0, 0 �D 0< fn G)�Z Zv Dp �m 'D �< U) m-_r ocDn mZcn Z �m0 -4Cn Do. z2' K0 no my Coll D?�D�, rO0 mZ -0 mom: 70cz =N ��.m�z. �N=' mZ m7on_ z v�':DoL"Dco �D Om vci �N: m� m D>(n <n�; �� cn �m Op �Dm mcnD ��0 C�D: �m cnu, Omoo ZC%= Oo) �O*z Oa) �m O =�A G7 G)-0 z_-c zm, z= �W m mzm. OOnO� ?Dp' Dmn --j zp X� DK� v -i O� cn -�� 0D`. rZ -D. D� <c zz 07� D�� ON'_0 -nc--n m� �cn vT� G)n0 zzm m`', vm �� z;u Oo ma p mz rD-p OD �� N^ c� m0 � � G)� 4)cAn Cam. �fn ��" 0�� 0�. �mm mmz zT 0 �� vmz �m -uD -+ 0 z <O �C m m O TO-m Am �� O G)v �m� �D X3: D �m -im O= ZpT m � �� bo 0�< D z z< mz mz *m OM ZD, G) 0 rn* pC �Z: Z z� D-z10T vm G)cnW 'O my CG �< v O C O nD O O < m C D O O �� O< rtm m m -i Dz= c �m cn: D m DZ 0 � NO co m o o? z. CO v� �m DZ z cn m� Az m N� W m: m %� m 0 -� � D Dm 9 C)C; >m ��z G) � A. �V m <v c W CO OZ cp' o- �D Tz r O D zD �m m' m0 D D, �X 0;0 czz, mz, M GZi= O mm 0DD -� �O �, 0 0 nm, MOOD, -1 0 c� O f!o r O Z D �_ W p <O vm� m m TD m: D Z' -. �D' m Zp, L7 Z O v m ZO: D D N rr DOD: Z' -i. � �, Z Z r,m p � D m v go m m' z ` � D m 0 m m m Wm; ..0 ..... _ ....0 ,... .(7 ,. .,... N .,.. .,,.OD ....,.,. A a)00 O) (T : N -4 j O O. 0 O N N O N O O N (D O Uv O ' On O W j C)((�� O: A O N U1 N O O) -4O ' (Tl CIl O O N N A A O) O7 C) O W:. O. 25 N W. O O ':. OD; OD V O.. (T : 75 O O V: N.: O) O'.. O. W3 O O' O N A O O O-, O O'.. O: W:. N.: O CD O:`: O:'. O O O O, N ()7 O) O: 0.. O--: O: C7 1 0: O :. ,. O: :. O O V: N,. W O' V O 00 -4 `: O O ! O: O. N V V (\O €, (O 0: O N N O W N O m m m m ... m 2 m ...2 m m m m .. m m ._ _ m m _ 0', r r m m z Z 0 D: O D O D O �0 D ri Z 0 D r m z. r' m z: 0 D r m Z O D': r m Z O D 0 D r m Z O -� �< D m' v vl v' v v v: vl v' v v. m z 0 X 0 0 2 m z m X ic --I ♦/ V) mn 0 X C. r N O O 563 006 ATTACHMENT 5 C/P STA TUS UPDA TE Work is continuing on Jefferson Street from Highway 1 1 1 to Avenue 54. The pipe manufacturer subcontracted by Granite Construction had delivered green PVC pipe to the job site for installation along Jefferson Street as the CVWD irrigation line. This PVC pipe has been stockpiled along Jefferson Street for approximately 10 months. The pipe manufacturer has guaranteed the pipe free of defects and has written a letter stating that the pipe can be exposed to direct sunlight for more than two years without any defects caused by the exposure. Even with these assurances, CVWD did not accept the pipe. New pipe has been delivered to the site and installed. The pipe supplier will charge a restocking fee. Vali Cooper, the City's Construction Manager, is reviewing the contract specifications to determine the responsible party. Final paving operations are now underway on Jefferson Street. Granite Construction's latest estimate for project completion is mid August 2001. City staff has commenced meetings with staff from Indio, CVAG, and CVWD to determine the lead agency that will be in charge of the L-3 pump station relocation project at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Ave 49. The Jefferson Street widening will be completed at Ave. 49 at that time. Until that work is complete, Jefferson Street, northbound, will transition to one lane at that location. City staff is also working with CVAG and Indio to accelerate the traffic signal at the intersection of Ave. 49 and Jefferson Street. Most of the improvements are completed with the exception of the final striping and pavement markings. Granite Construction stated that the light standards for the prototypical street were ordered late and will not be delivered to the site until late August. The City's Construction Manager is working with Granite Construction to close Ave. Mendoza (adjacent to the museum) by utilizing bollards and signage. The City's Construction Manager is sending letters to all of the property owners asking for any comments or concerns regarding their private property that may have been affected by the project. This will provide the City with additional opportunity to rectify legitimate concerns. T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\VOGT\CIP Augustupdate.wpd 564 007 Granite Construction is behind schedule and has not provided a completion date at this time. The City's Construction Manager and City staff are evaluating the project specifications, delays, and anticipated schedule to determine the extent of the liquidated damages that will be assessed to the contractor. Much of the work has now been completed. Punch list items must still be completed. The City's Construction Manager is sending letters to all of the property owners asking for any comments or concerns regarding their private property that may have been affected by the project. This will provide the City with additional opportunity to rectify legitimate concerns. Granite Construction is behind schedule and has not provided a proposed completion date at this time. The City's Construction Manager and City staff are evaluating the project specifications, delays, and anticipated schedule to determine the extent of the liquidated damages that will be assessed to the contractor. Area D is complete except for a number of "punchlist" items still outstanding. These items will be completed prior to final acceptance by the City. The City's Construction Manager is sending letters to all of the property owners asking for any comments or concerns regarding their private property that may have been affected by the project. This will provide the City with additional opportunity to rectify legitimate concerns. The mini park is planned behind the proposed sound wall at Saguaro, Sagebrush, and Bottlebrush. This project was awarded to Ray Lopez Associates during the May 1, 2001 City Council meeting. The plans for this park are being completed. It is anticipated that the park will be completed by mid -November 2001. The landscaping and proposed sound wall aesthetic amenities will be addressed along with the Montero Estates sound wall project. There has been a delay in the completion of this project. The sign manufacturer that was working as a sub -consultant to the General Contractor has filed for bankruptcy. The General Contractor has resolved the issue regarding the sign manufacturer and is T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\VOGT\CIP Augustupdate.wpd 5 65 008 moving forward to complete the sign installation. The City is presently part of a three-way contract with Spanos and Stamko for the construction of the median on Adams Street from Avenue 47 to Avenue 48. Construction commenced during the week of December 4, 2000 and was complete on June 11, 2001 . City staff is working with Stamko to close out the project. Design, plans, and specifications are 99% complete. The final connection of a water line feed to supply the proposed lake with water from the All American Canal must be approved by CVWD. CVWD has approved the conceptual plan and has also completed final comments for the approval of the irrigation system. Upon signature on the plans by CVWD, City staff will advertise the Civic Center Campus for bid. The City Council approved plans and authorized advertisement for bid on December 19, 2000. The City's consultant, TKD, originally proposed utilization of canal water for the Civic Center Campus Lake to CVWD on October 10, 2000. Approval was received for this concept by CVWD on December 27, 2000. CVWD informed the City's consultant that it would take a few months in order to complete a water service agreement for the canal water. Plans for providing canal water to the Civic Center Campus Lake were first submitted to CVWD during the last week of April 2001. CVWD recently informed the city that they will be unable to supply canal water to the site. The plans will go forward utilizing potable water. Final plan mylars with all corrections have been submitted to CVWD on August 10, 2001. It is anticipated that the mylars will be signed by CVWD so the project may be advertized for bid during the week of August 27. In order to obtain competitive bids, a one month bidding period will be advertised in late August 2001, with bid opening in late September 2001. Barring any unforseen circumstances, construction should commence in early November of 2001. The project is specified as a 180 day project, with an anticipated completion date in mid May 2002. On December 5, 2000, the City Council awarded a design contract to The Keith Companies (TKC) to design various sidewalk and street improvements throughout the City. These include a low water crossing at Avenue 50, sidewalk along the west side of Washington Street from Avenida La Fonda to Avenue 52, sidewalk along the north T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\VOGT\CIP Augustupdate.wpd 566 009 side of Sagebrush Drive, paved sidewalk from Saguaro to Avenue 50 on the east side of Washington Street, paved sidewalk on the north side of Avenue 50 from Washington Street to connect to the existing sidewalk fronting the Sports Complex, and sidewalk and street improvements along Westward Ho and Dune Palms Road in conjunction with an SB 821 grant. The City has received a grant to construct bicycle lanes on Calle Tampico, Park Ave., and Ave. 50. An Amendment has been negotiated with the Keith Companies to design the bicycle lanes as part of the sidewalk project. This will provide a construction cost savings as well as a time savings to both projects. The City Council approved the plans, specifications, and engineers estimate and authorized staff to bid the project on June 19, 2001. The City is awaiting signatures from the City of Indio (Dune Palms), and CVWD (Low Water Crossing on Ave 50) prior to bid. It is anticipated that the project will be advertized in mid July, 2001. Award is anticipated for the first Council meeting in October with project completion anticipated by January 2002. The City Council approved this concept on December 19, 2000 and authorized the City Manager to enter into the MOU contingent upon the City Attorney's approval as to the form. When the City Council initially approved this concept, representatives of the Tradition were proposing to take the lead. Since that time, the Tradition has requested that the City take the lead. A new MOU was approved during the May 15, 2001 City Council meeting with the City as the lead. This work will be completed as part of the citywide sidewalk project that is planned for the west side of Washington Street between Ave. La Fonda and Ave. 52. The City Council awarded the contract to DBX, Inc. on June 19, 2001 with the construction commencing by August 2001. Barring any unforeseen conditions, this project should be completed by November 2001, depending on delivery time of the signal poles and controller cabinets. During the April 3, 2001 Council meeting, the City Council awarded the design project to Harris and Associates. The Consultant has completed new sound studies and three conceptual designs for City Manager and staff review and approval. Per the City T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\VOGT\CIP Augustupdate.wpd 5 6 , 010 Council's direction, a design concept was chosen by the City Manager and staff based on noise attenuation requirements and aesthetics. This one concept was approved by the City Council during their August 7, 2001 Council Meeting. Harris and Associates have been provided with the City Council direction and are in the process of finalizing the plans and specifications. During the April 17, 2001 Council meeting, the City Council awarded the design of this project to Harris and Associates. The project will rehabilitate the existing pavement on Washington Street from 1700 feet north of Avenue 50 to Simon Drive, and on Eisenhower Drive from Washington Street to Coachella Drive. As of July 10, 2001, the field inventory of existing surface utilities, striping, traffic signal loops, and pavement repair areas (dig -outs) is complete. Harris and Associates have submitted 80% completed plans to the City Staff on August 10, 2001. Harris and Associates will provide a cost estimate for the design amendments to address the Council's directions. Citywide mini park expansion projects include the Eisenhower Park expansion, the new Cove mini park, and the mini park between Bottlebrush and Sagebrush. The expansion of Eisenhower Park is identified in the Fiscal Year 1997/1998 CIP. An amount of $160,000 was appropriated for this project. The Cove Mini Park and the Pocket Park at Bottlebrush/Saguaro/Sagebrush are each identified as projects in the 2000/2001 CIP. The Cove Mini Park allocates $140,720, and the Bottlebrush/Saguaro/Sagebrush Pocket Park appropriates $40,000. The total budget available for these parks combined is $340,720. A contract consultant was selected and the City Council awarded the design/build contract to Ray Lopez Associates during the May 1, 2001 City Council meeting. The design is now underway. The consultant has indicated that his preliminary schedule is to complete the parks by mid -November 2001. However, a final schedule has not been submitted and approved by City staft. The City Council approved a contract with Peter Urbon on October 3, 2000. It is anticipated that Mr. Urbon will provide the obelisks to the City for installation by June 2001. During the April 3, 2001 City Council meeting, the Council approved an Amendment T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\VOGT\CIP Augustupdate.wpd 568 011 to change the material and style of lettering on the obelisks. The artist is proceeding with the construction of the obelisks. Peter Urbon has informed staff that the obelisks will be delivered by mid August. City staff met with representatives from Indio, CVAG, and RBF to discuss the proposal for the final design of the Jefferson Street Project from Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard. STIP Funding and Measure A Funding were discussed. RBF will complete a feasibility study to determine whether a bridge should be constructed over the Whitewater Channel and if Jefferson Street, from Westward Ho to the Channel, should be constructed as a four lane or six lane facility. RBF will complete the Project Study Report (PSR) and the EIS for the project. Since STIP Funding will be utilized (Federal funding), the EIR under the CEQA provisions is no longer applied. The environmental provisions must now comply with National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). The Cities of La Quinta and Indio, the County of Riverside, and CVAG are presently reviewing RBF's proposal prior to proceeding. Funding for the City's portion of this work has been identified in the CIP for the year 2000/2001. This funding did not take into account a bridge over the Whitewater Channel. The feasibility study that will be completed by RBF will address a bridge over the Whitewater Channel. CVAG has money identified in the Measure A program and has been discussing utilizing State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funds for this project. The County of Riverside and the City of Indio are also participating; however, the status of their funding is unknown. The City of La Quinta was successful in an RCTC Call for Projects for STIP Discretionary funding for the Jefferson Street Bridge. The City was awarded $963,000 to be utilized as part of the City's 25 % share for the bridge. Discussions are now taking place to determine which agency will act as lead on the project. A greater geographic proportion of the project is within Indio's boundaries. Presently, the Cities of La Quinta and Indio will meet with the County and CVAG to determine the lead agency for the project. The design plans are being completed by David Evans and Associates (DEA) and are approximately 95 % complete. City Council has approved the landscaping for the roundabout and the landscaping pallet for the median. City Council also approved removing the landscaping in front of the Citrus and replacing it with the City pallet as part of this project. City staff is working with representatives of the City of Indio to TAPWDEPT\STAFF\VOGT\CIP Augustupdate.wpd 569 012 develop an MOU for shared costs for construction and maintenance of the median islands. It is anticipated that the plans, specifications, and engineer's estimate will be brought forward to the City Council for approval and authorization to bid after the completion of the Jefferson Street Project. The irrigation plans are presently at CVWD for final approval. This project is identified in the City's CIP for Fiscal Year 2000/2001. An amount of $167,655 has been appropriated under RDA Project Area #1 for these improvements. This project includes the restoration of the lighting system for the southern four courts, installation of dasher boards for roller hockey, and the potential conversion of one court to a basketball court. It is anticipated that an RFP will be developed for the design, plans, specifications, and engineer's estimate in July 2001. The Community Services Commission reviewed three concepts for the park at their regularly scheduled meeting on December 1 1, 2000. After review, modifications were suggested. The consultant, Steve Lang of Purkiss Rose-RSI revised the plan and presented the project to the City Council during the January 2, 2001 City Council Study Session. City Council made a number of comments during the January 2, 2001 Study Session. Those comments have been incorporated into a Phase Plan that was presented to the City Council on February 6, 2001. The budgeted amount for this project is $2,000,000. The City of La Quinta has received $500,000 of Proposition 12 funds that may be applied to this project, thereby bringing the construction budget to $2.5 million. The City Council approved the Master Plan for the park during the April 3, 2001 City Council Meeting. Please note that the project time line is tentative dependent upon approvals as necessary with each task. The Professional Services Agreement was executed, and the review of the project has begun. The construction documents will be ready for review by the Planning Commission at their September 11, 2001 meeting and the public hearing held at the City Council Meeting on September 18, 2001. It is anticipated that once the construction documents are approved by the City Council, the bidding process will take approximately 6 weeks with the proposed award by the second meeting in December 2001. From the award of contract, it is anticipated that the construction period for the park will be 180 days. If construction begins by the middle of January 2002, the completion of the project is anticipated in July 2002. T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\VOGT\CIP Augustupdate.wpd 570 013 On October 30 and 31, 2000, the Museum Expansion Consultant Selection Committee interviewed five firms that specialize in historical building expansions. Staff has met with Paul Johnson of Ferris, Johnson & Perkins to discuss the design concept contract. Once the design has been reviewed by staff, the City Council will review the design during a Study Session. It is anticipated that the Study Session will take place at the September 18, 2001 City Council Meeting. Funding for the construction of the museum expansion is contained in the Fiscal Year 2003/04 Capital Improvement Program with a construction amount of $618,000. T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\VOGT\CIP Augustupdate.wpd 571 014 POLICE July Significant Activity Report School Resource Officer Report for July Target Team Report for July June Crime Statistics Sum- mary Explorer Program Report for July Motor Officer Statistics Report for July Volume 1, Issue 8, Indio Station Traffic Report Special points of interest from the Crime Statistic Summary: DUI arrests continue to increase as traffic officers focus on that offense. Misdemeanor thefts for the YTD 2001 are showing a slight in- crease over the number of thefts for YTD 2000. YTD 2001 statistics reveal that felony sex crimes and rapes are occurring at a significantly re- duced rate when compared to YTD 2000 statistics. While the YTD 2001 statistics show an increase in the number of auto thefts occurring, the month -to -month statistics show that this increase stopped and have actually started to decrease. Indio Station Welcomes Lieutenant Joe A new face has joined the Indio Station staff. Joe is a life-long resident of the Coachella Valley and has spent his entire law enforcement career in the Indio/Palm Desert area. Joe is a graduate of Indio High School and started his law enforcement career with Indio Police Department in 1977. Joe joined the Riverside County Sheriffs Department in 1982. Lt. Tucker worked a multitude of assignments while assigned to the Palm Desert Station, including patrol, field training officer, and investigations. After his promotion to Ser- geant in 1991, Joe worked several assignments i n c l u d i n g corrections, patrol watch commander, and the supervision of the Detective Bureau at the Palm Desert Station. In 1999, Joe was _ assigned to super- vise the first regional homicide unit ever established in River- side County. This homicide unit, now known as the Cen- tral Homicide Unit, handled all murder and death investiga- tions in the eastern portion of Riverside County, including the City of La Quinta. Joe was promoted to the rank of Sheriffs Lieutenant in 2000 and continued his duties with the Central Homicide Unit until his transfer to the Indio Station. His new duties will include the direction of all patrol operations. Joe's experience and knowledge will be a welcome addition to the Indio Station. Joe currently resides in the Coachella Valley with his wife, Shelley, and their daughter Katie, age 19. Vehicle Theft Trends for the Year 2000 The California Highway Patrol recently released their Year 2000 Auto Theft Report. This report is a compilation of auto- mobile theft statistics from jurisdictions throughout the State of California. A total of 181,427 vehicles were stolen statewide in California, a 7% increase over 1999. In Riverside County, more than 8,000 vehicles were stolen. This total was 15% more than the total in 1999. The agency reporting the most stolen vehicles was the Los Angeles Police Department followed by the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. The Riverside County Sheriffs Department reported the 8th highest number of stolen vehicles in Califor- nia. The report indicated that 62% of all stolen cars were reported in Southern California. Each year, the report identifies those vehicles that are the most frequently stolen. This year's most frequently stolen vehicles were: Toyota Camry Honda Accord Honda Civic Toyota Pick-up Toyota Van Chevy Pick-up Yamaha Motorcycles COACHB.LAVALLEY NARCD*nCS TASK FORCE June 2001- La Quinta Condensed SUAIWOS June YTQ Arrests 0 15 Searches 0 18 Seizures Og 245g Value 0 $17:L347 Weapons Seized 0 8 572 City of La Quinta La Quinta Police Department Captain Darla Singerton, Commanding July 2001 Highlights (Numbers in parenthesis denotes number of calls for service that day) Sunday. 07-01-01 (4U Keith Bigalow, 40, Palm Desert, arrested for burglary and narcotics warrants. Phillip Rios Jr, 23, Palm Desert, arrested for strong-arm robbery. He and another Hispanic male knocked victim down and grabbed necklace from his neck. Monica Ochoa, 32, La Quinta, arrested for battery warrant at her residence. Monday, 07-02-01 (44): Suicide at PGA West, 67-year-old female rolled wheelchair into pool. She left several notes attesting to suicide. Tuesday, 07-03-01 (54): John Rumenap, 32, Fullerton, arrested for DUI. Francisco Camacho, 31, Coachella, arrested for burglary at Wal-Mart. Entered with intent to steal, caught with $100 in merchandise as he left store. Wednesday. 07-04-01 (65): Juvenile arrested for petty theft following ped check. He had just stolen car part from nearby car and tossed object as deputy pulled up. Owner of car contacted and identified part. Ricardo Bernal, 30, cite released on three misdemeanor warrants. Manuel Montes, 21, Mecca, arrested for DUI. Thursday. 07-05-01 (46): Robert Valdivia, 55, La Quinta, arrested for DUI. Shirleen Harbort, 29, Palm Desert, arrested for public intoxication. Several more mailboxes broken into in Bella Vista tract. Occurred Wednesday night to Thursday morning. Same MO as previous. 573 City of La Quinta Page 2 Friday, 07-06-01 (53): Robert Richey, 47, La Quinta, arrested for spousal battery. On July 6, at approximately 0943 hours, officers of the La Quinta Police Department responded to the above location for a report of a multiple vehicle traffic collision, with injuries. Upon arrival Officers discovered three vehicles involved and two parties were injured. Two of the vehicles had sustained major damage. On of the vehicles involved (White Ford Ranger) belonged to "Duran's Pest Control." The pesticide tank on the truck had been damaged as a result of the collision and was leaking pesticide onto the roadway. Preliminary investigation has revealed the White Ford Ranger was driven by a Marcilino Lopez, a 24 year Indio resident, and had been turning westbound onto Avenida Femando from northbound Eisenhower Drive, when he was struck broadside by a Silver Mercury sedan traveling southbound on Eisenhower Drive. A Michelle Aguilar, a 30-year-old Coachella resident, drove the Mercury. The impact of the collision forced the Ford Ranger into a third vehicle, a Green Mitsubishi Mirage, which had been stopped on Avenida Fernando at Eisenhower Dr. The Mitsubishi was driven by a 54 year old La Quinta resident who was not injured. The Mitsubishi sustained minor damage. Mr. Lopez and Mrs. Aguilar sustained minor to moderate injuries and were transported to JFK Hospital for further treatment. The Mercury sedan and Ford truck sustained major damage and were towed from the scene. Approximately 25-30 gallons of pesticide (Diazinon 4E) leaked onto the roadway and gutter area, from the damaged Pest Control truck, however the leak was quickly stopped and the spill was cleaned up by employees of Duran's Pest Control, and Califomia Department of Forestry. The roadway at the scene of the collision remained open. The exact cause of the collision is still under investigation Saturday, 07-07-01 (44): Eddie Leyva Jr., 18, DHS, arrested for DUI. During stop passenger, Gary Ragle, 19, Palm Springs, threw out a checkbook containing numerous credit cards and other paperwork belonging to Palm Desert resident. Called house and woman advised that she had just been awakened by noise a few minutes earlier. She discovered purse missing when I called. Both suspects booked for burglary by Palm Desert deputies. Sunday, 07-08-01 (30): 48-year-old female who claims to have 100 personalities reported having been raped repeatedly by unknown male who has key to her apartment. Victim would only discuss the crime in the personality of 3-year-old. Friend had found her naked in bathtub smelling of bleach, which the victim states the suspect poured on her. Monday, 07-09-01 (49): None 574 City of La Quinta Page 3 Tuesday, 07-10-01 (49): John Michel, 35, La Quinta, arrested for possession of narcotics. Injury collision on Bermudas at Chillon. Kevin Oleson, 38, and Rosa Sanabria, 58, both of La Quinta involved. Cause still being investigated. Michael Cook, 21, La Quinta, ate released for possession of marijuana. Jeremy Rios, 20, Cathedral City, arrested for attempt burglary and making terrorist threats at 4435 Blazing Star. Wednesday, 07-11-01 (49): Brian Sullivan, 23, Palm Desert, arrested for DUI. Robert Lawrence, 45, Yucca Valley, arrested for DUI. Zachary Devoe, 32, La Quinta, arrested for violation of TRO. Thursday, 07-12-01 (50): Lawrence Valenzuela, 36, Indio, arrested for DUI, involved in minor injury traffic collision. Donald Erving, 26, La Quinta, arrested for domestic battery. Friday, 07-13-01 (65): Michael J. Silver, 45,La Quinta arrested for felony narcotic warrant and misc. narcotic violations. Aurelio Ruiz, 43, Thermal, was cited and released on mild. warrant after telephoning dispatch and advising them he wanted to turn himself in. Michael Obeso, 41, La Quinta arrested for spousal abuse. Saturday, 07-14-01 (55): Tanisha Duran, 23yrs, of Thermal arrested for DUI. Dep. Adams. Benedicto Salanga, 7/4/74 of Indio, arrested for ADW and Terrorist Threats @ the Smoketree Apts. He attempted to hit his brother-in-law, Albert Aceves, with a child's scooter and a rock. He then threatened to kill Aceves if he called the police. Dep. Donivon. Emil Nicholson, 3/7/87 of La Quinta, and Michael Bartle, 10/21/87 of La Quinta, arrested for trespass at the La Quinta Resort. They are also suspects in previous thefts at the location. Released to parents. Dep. Bolton. 575 City of La Quinta Sunday, 07-15-01 (451: Page 4 Gary Colletti, 21 yrs of La Quinta, arrested Assault Wintent to Commit Rape and Lewd Acts with a Minor. He was found with a female who had just turned 14yrs. His vehicle had been reported to 911 for driving in the wash area. Dep. Smith. Paul McCarthy III, 26yrs of La Quinta, arrested for Public Intoxication after being found passed out in his front yard on a disturbance call. Dep. Thomas Jesse James Vogelsang, 8/29/80, and Alexander Prometheus, 12/21/78 both of La Quinta, arrested for Public Intoxication after a vehicle check at Rubio X Arroba. Stephanie Messier, 19yrs of La Quinta, arrested for DUI after a stop at WA x Fred Waring. Dep. Adams. Monday, 07-16-01 (51): Auto theft from Wal-Mart. '00 Toyota Camry. No leads. Dep. Alvarez. Solo, rollover T/C at Ave 52 X Jefferson. Robert Laredo, 20yrs of La Quinta, was ejected and received moderate injuries. Possibly DUI related. Dep. Brewster. Manuel Jimenez, 8/22/80 of La Quinta, arrested for narcotics paraphernalia and warrants after a traffic stop at Ave 50 X Eisenhower. Dep. Garcia. Tuesday, 07-17-01 (66): Janet Vorce, 49, La Quinta , arrested for public intoxication and discharge of a firearm. Prior to the arrest Deputy had to shoot the dog. Wednesday, 07-18-01 (56): Jose Juan Gonzalez, 25, LA Quinta arrested for poss. of illegal weapons. John Gregg Buchannan, 42, La Quinta, arrested for burglary. Thursday, 07-19-01 (52): Rudy Zepeda, 40, La Quinta, arrested for public intoxication. Friday, 07-20-01 (55): None Saturday, 07-21-01 ("1: Edwardo Nunez, 7/27/75 of Indio, arrested for DUI at Washington X of 111. Dep. Wedertz. Sunday, 07-22-01 (38): Eric Gutierrez, 5/23/87 of Indio, arrested for DUI at Ave 50 x Jefferson. Dep. Hughes. 576 City of La Quinta Monday. 07-23-01 (51): Page 5 Jorge Felix, 19yrs of La Quinta, arrested for being Under the Influence of Drugs in the 52700 block of Martinez. Dep. Myers. Tuesday. 07-24-01 (44): Minor Injury Traffic Collision at Eisenhower and calle Durango. Rheta Somohano, 48, La Quinta failed to yield to a vehicle driven by, Irene Nunez, 56, La Quinta. (Complaint of pain) Wednesday, 07-25-01(60): Emmanuel Guevara, 21, North Shore, arrested for receiving stolen property. Thursday, 07-26-01 (61): David Michael Otis, 34, Texas, arrested for DUI. Vicente Sanchez, 25, La Quinta, arrested for DUI. Ignatius Connolly, 36, Minnesota, arrested for DUI after non -injury traffic collision. Connolly attempted to carjack a vehicle to flee scene but was unsuccessful. Friday 07-27-01 (47): Barbara Cataudella, 56, La Quinta, arrested for felony warrant from LAPD. Christopher Meyer 42, Palm Springs, and Kristi Stirens, 18, Palm Desert arrested for under the influence of a controlled substance. Saturday. 07-28-01 (34): Mark Lemmerman, 12/23/62 of La Quinta, arrested for shoplifting at Stater Bros. he was caught for the second time in as many days. He was trying to take 2 burritos and 2 (24oz) beers. Dep. Price. Injury collision occurred when a driver ran as stop light at Fred Waring X Jefferson. Injured party was treated and released. Dep. B. Lee. Sunday, 07-29-01 (38): LAR01210021 - Michael Bloom, 6/26169 of La Quinta, was arrested at his residence on Martinez for felony warrants. Dep. Leary Monday. 07-30-01 (52): None ka 577 City of La Quinta Tuesday, 07-31-01 (43): Page 6 Ricky Perez, 112179 of Indio, and Veronique Shriner, 010378 of La Quinta, were arrested during a vehicle stop. Perez for Possession of Meth, DUI, and 3 warrants, Shriner for being Under the Influence of Drugs. Dep. Leary and Jimenez. (Shriner is a suspect in the theft of her mother's car 3 days ago. She checked herself out of Betty Ford 4 days ago.) Injury collision at Eisenhower and Coachella. Both drivers claim their light was green. Cristy Banke of La Quinta, was taken to EMC with moderate injuries. Total of calls for service: 1531 578 CITY of LA QUINTA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT July 2001* SCHOOL: LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL Deputy: Stephen Morton RSO Grant Funded Position HIGHLIGHTS: 1 attended a school resource officer's training seminar on "Finding Solutions for School Violence." The seminar provided an abundance of information relating to school safety issues and how to implement them. I attended a training class on "Booby Traps and Explosives" at the Ben Clark Training Center. I conducted several pedestrian checks in and near the high school campus. I responded to a traffic collision in front of the high school, and I conducted several traffic stops near the school. • I arrested a student for a juvenile bench warrant. I conducted an investigation of a theft at Wal-Mart Stores and identified the suspect. A report and arrest warrant was filed with the District Attorney's Office. • 1 assisted the Investigations Unit on locating several missing and or runaway juveniles. The juveniles were located and returned home. 1 assisted the High School Administration with traffic concerns for the upcoming school session. A plan was devised to alleviate the student drop-off and pick-up traffic congestion and the student parking was relocated to insure safety and security. Actual reporting period covers June 25, 2001 through July 27, 2001 SROs attend patrol briefings, participate in investigations with juvenile suspects, and attend the numerous school -related committee meetings. Their knowledge of student activities is invaluable to police efforts in juvenile crime prevention and apprehension. 579 MOTORCYCLE OFFICER STATISTICS July 2001* Days worked: 11 (1 day for funeral, 2 days for unit service, 1 sick day) Total citations: 54 Speeding: 39 Stop sign: Radar: 24 Mechanical: Pace: 15 Seatbelt: Red light: 5 City citations: Turning: 5 Stored vehicles: High speeds: 25 mph- None. 35 mph- None 45 mph- 95 mph, Eisenhower and Washington (DUI). 50 mph-100 mph, Washington south of Ave. 47. 55 mph- None. Avg. speed over the speed limit: 22 mph. Avg. citations per day: 5 Associated vehicle code violations: Suspended/Unlic. Drivers: 8 No insurance: 9 Mechanical: 2 1 T/C's: 6 2 DUI's 8 0 Warrants: 5 2 Felony Arrests: 2 14 Seatbelt: 0 Turning: 0 Drugs/ Alcohol: 8 NOME Riverside County Sheriff's Department La Quinta Target Team Monthly Report July 2001 Deputy Edward Price and Deputy Aaron Eller The following is a summary of the Target Team activities for the month of June. Ongoing Investigations 6 Arrests/ Filings 8 Vehicle checks 5 Business Contacts 5 Investigation assists 3 Warrants Served 1 Arrest Warrants Attempted 3 Programs 1 Pedestrian Checks 9 Crime Prevention Hours 5 Bar Checks 2 Back-ups 5 Follow-ups 30 Search Warrants 0 Probation Searches 8 Parole Searches 5 Meetings 1 Recovered Stolen Property $200.00 581 LA QUINTA TARGET TEAM REPORT — JULY Citations issued Surveillances Property Checks Civil Commitments Bicycle Time Training Hours Illegal Drugs Seized it It Is Total Mileage: 686 miles 0 0 5 1 0 0 1.5 grams methamphetamine 2 cc heroin Arrests/ Criminal Filings Page 2 • A North Shore resident was arrested and charged with receiving stolen property. A La Quinta resident was arrested for possession of illegal narcotics. • A La Quinta resident was arrested for possessing illegal drugs and a felony arrest warrant. Noteworthy Accomplishments; • The Target Team continued investigating the recent auto -thefts and increased number of thefts in thecove area. Numerous suspects have been identified. • The Target Team arrested Wally Venecia and Emmanuel Guevara, suspects in major auto theft rings. • The Target team severed an arrest warrant on Michael Silver at his residence and recovered illegal narcotics. • The Target Team is conducting extra patrol in the parks reference violations of city ordinances related to the_parks; e.g., drinking and barbequing. • The Target Team along with R.A.I.D. is currently working together in order to identify and arrest the persons involved in numerous vehicle thefts in La Quinta. • The Target Team authored a program, which focused on conducting searches of persons and their residents who were determined to be on active probation and parole. During the 1-day program, 13 residents were visited with no one found to be in violation of probation or parole conditions. 582 CITY OF LA Q UINTA y r.: CRIME STATISTICS SUMMARY JUNE 2001 CITY OF LA QUINTA JUNE CRIME COMPARISONS CRIMP JUNL' 2001 JUNF, 2000 YTD (01) YTD (00) *HOMICIDE IDE 0 0 1 0 *RAPE 1 0 7 11 SEX CRIMES (FEL) 1 4 1 9 SEX C. RlMES (MISD) 1 1 9 11 ROBBERY 1 0 5 6 ASSAULT (FEL) 18 9 61 53 ASSAULT (MISD) 19 21 113 111 BURGLARY 71 35 -_ 323 191 *VEHICLE T EF1' 12 1.3 61 51 *THEFT (FI 1L.) 25 18 135 111 THEFT (MISD) 57 20 247 201 VANDA-LISM (MISD) 26 35 146 191. DOM. VIOLENCE 15 13 82 74 NARCOTICS 7 7 65 44 DIJI 13 9 56 41 '1'/C' NON -INJURY 47 30 276 261 T/C INJURY 4 4 30 29 TIC FATAL 0 0 2 2 1'1IAFFIC Cl`1'ATi0Nti 204 332 1802 1297 * STATISTIC'S INCLUDE ATTEMPTS 585 ,r... LO In 06 1 CD 1 � 1 00 (D C 586 H z W 40 4W r LCI r LO r M M r LO C) r r r ' 1 t Q C) 0 C) Cyr CD LO 0 LO 0 N N C) 0 0 C) 0 U") N w w D U. D W O1 In cri 0- 9 d U d 587 � z w CL w 0 ui 0 CL R W ai WA T— O O O O O N N W W Z Z 1 1 1 ; r r 1 � 1 I 1 ; r i I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 P CD Lr w T 0 w 0 ., 589 T- C) C) C) W Lij z z J U i r, 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 4T N 0 w Tlo- % qr- t" I"- �•f 9 C) 00 N qr— 591 c� LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO 0 ul 0 LO 0 CN N z 0 z U) z a �r w Q Li- LL 9 14M 592 lnbio *tation traffic �uCCetitt Bulletins are provided to standardize traffic enforcement procedures and accident investigation. Additionally bulletins will provide training about department policy, legal issues, and law updates. The Zero Tolerance Law .01 BAC or more (23136 V.C.) With summer upon us and young drivers out on school break, a review of the current laws re- garding alcohol use and driving is appropriate. Sometimes the multi- ple levels, ages, and forms needed for these different violations can be confusing. This months' Traffic Bulletin will focus exclusively on these laws. In 1994, the Ca. Legislator passed the Zero Tolerance Law which enacted section 23136 of the vehicle code. This law makes it illegal for anyone under that age of 21 to drive a motor vehicle with a BAC of >.01. Enforcement of this law is by peace officers with penal- ties assessed by the DMV. This section is an administrative law and not a infraction, misdemeanor, or felony. As a result, the procedures are different than normal criminal cases. For example: Upon contact with a driver of a vehicle you have stopped for failing to stop for a red signal, you detect objective symptoms of alco- hol intoxication (glassy eyes and slight odor of alcoholic beverages). The driver hands you his CDL which indicates his age is 19 years old. Further questions reveal the driver has no medical problems nor is he taking medications. He denies drinking any alcohol. You request he perform FST's to which he consents. No HGN is present and his FSTs were performed as explained. Since the driver is under 21, it is mandatory that he complete a PAS test or face a min. one year license revocation. The P.A.S. tests results are .033/.032. Obviously the driver has been less than honest about his choice of drinks for the evening. Immediately seize his CDL and begin issuing the DS 367. No other chemical test is re- quired. If a PAS is unavailable, the driver has to take a blood/breath test. Issue a citation to the driver that has the red light violation listed. Also include any licensing violations (unlicensed, suspended, or restricted) and any contraband violations (see Quick Reference Section) located during the inven- tory search of the vehicle. Do not include 23136 V.C. on the citation. After explaining the Admin per Se suspension to the driver and giving him his copy, advise him the vehicle cannot be released to him since he has been drinking and is under age. Remember what would be the consequences of re- leasing the vehicle back to the same underage driver and letting him drive away? Needless to say, it would not be a pleasant situation to be in if he left the scene and later crashed with the notice of suspen- sion and your citation in his pocket. Make arraignments to have the vehicle picked up by a sober person (preferably a parent) or stored per 22651(h)(2) V.C. This section per- mits the storage of a vehicle after the driver was served a notice of suspension per 23136/23140 V.C. Based on the age of the driver (generally if they are < 18), you may need to transport to the station to await their parents. Or you can transport them directly to their residence. Remember, its not gen- erally a great choice to have a mad, intoxicated, minor walking down the roadway in an early morning attempt to get home. The report for this incident will be written as an A.O.DJDMV with copies forwarded to DMV. The citation will be attached to the report as will a copy of the PAS device calibration sheet. There is no need for extra copies since it goes directly to the DMV. Driver <21 years with BAC of .05-.08 (23140 V.C.) Section 23140 V.C. was also enacted in 1994. It lowered the level at which drivers under 21 are presumed to be under the influence from .08 to .05. This section differs from that of 23136 in that it is not only an administrative section, but it is also an infraction. This section is also a bookable section for driv- ers over 18 years of age if no other disposition can be ar- raigned. Using the same example listed in 23136 above, you ob- serve the following additional ob- jective symptoms in the driver. HGN, difficulty in following in- structions, and some balance im- pairment. The results of the PAS test were a .063/.064. You advise the driver he is detained for a vio- lating 23140 V.C. No other chemi- cal tests are required, but can be completed if desired. Issue the driver the Admin per se paperwork. Issue the driver a citation with the violation stopped for, any other licensing or contraband sections, and 23140 V. C. This is the only alcohol related violation where the driver is cited for both a moving violation and an alcohol related driving section. Store per 22651(h)(2) V.C. or release the vehicle to a sober adult as in the previous example and make arraignment for the driver. The report for this incident is a 23140 V.C. report with any addi- tional charges listed. Complete the DMV paperwork and attach copies to your report. Send DMV origi- nals to the DMV ASAP. Attach direct file form and send to IMC. Riverside County Sheriff Department Volume I, Issue 8 August I, 2001 Quick Reference: V.C. Sections for alcohol related violations 2322 / (a) V.C— No driver shall drink any alcoholic bev- erage while driving on a hwy. 2322 I (b) V.C— No passen- ger shall drink any alcoholic beverage while in a vehicle on a hwy. 23222(a) V.C— No person shall have in their possession or on their person an open container of alcoholic bever- ages upon a highway. 23223(a) V.C. -No driver shall have in their possession an open container. 23223(b) V.C-No passenger shall have in their possession an open container (exception: passengers in bus, limo, or housecar). 23224(a) V.C— Driver <21 knowingly operate a vehicle containing alcohol. 23224(b) V.C— Passenger <21 personal poss. of alcohol in a vehicle. 23225 V.0 Owner or driver allow open containers of alco- hot in passenger compare ment. DUI Arrest Do's and Don'ts • Do- Make sure time of stop is the same on the Form A, DMV 367, Citation, and narrative. • Do- Issue Admin Per Se paper- work to out-of-state drivers if BAC is .08 or more (adults) or .01 or more (minors). • Don't Seize out-of-state CDL's under any circumstances. Photo- copy them and attach a copy to report and DMV paperwork. • Don't - Attach breath card to report. Photocopy it, log original into evidence, and attach copies to report and DMV forms. 593 Presented by: Department Report City of L Quinta Fire Department Quarterly Report Dorian J. Cooley Battalion Chief 594 Tom Tisdale Fire Chief Proudly serving the unincorporated areas of Riverside County and the cities of: Beaumont .;. Banning Calimesa Canyon Lake Coachella 4. Desert Hot Springs Indian Wells Indio ev Lake Elsinore La Quinta Moreno Valley Palm Desert Perris Rancho Mirage .v San Jacinto 10 Temecula Board of Supervisors Bob Buster, District 1 John Tavaglione, District 2 Jim Venable, District 3 Roy Wilson, District 4 Tom Mullen, District 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT In cooperation with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection 210 West San Jacinto Avenue • Perris, California 925M • (909) 940439M • FAX (909) 940-6910 August 10, 2001 Honorable Mayor Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Ref: Quarterly Report Attached please find the Fire Department Quarterly Report for the City of La Quinta for April through June of 2001. The report depicts the following highlights: Riverside County Fire Department units responded to a total of: • Medical Aids 274 • False Alarms 0 • Structure Fires 25 • Vegetation Fires 4 • Automatic Ringing False Alarm 100 • Other Fires (vehicle, refuse, etc.) 33 • Public Service Assists 21 (non -emergency assistance) • Fire Menace Standby 15 (fuel spill, gas leak etc.) Attachments Respectfully submitted, Tom Tisdale Fire Chief lip ---e By: Dorian J. Cooley Battalion Chief 595 300 250 200 150 100 0 La Quinta City Fire Responses Quarterly Totals Quarterly Comparisons 02001 ■ 2000 N � � Q U c Q N U- � � U N NN N U U ca a)p ¢ N N "cA N cc cm.0 C O Q -W ( `co U- Second Quarter 2001 2000 Medical Aids 274 245 False Alarms 0 35 Structure Fire 25 21 Vegetation Fires 4 19 Ringing Alarms 100 79 Other Fires 33 25 Public Service Assists 21 30 re Menace Standby 15 9 PTOTALS 472 463 8/10/O1 59G 120 100 A e 40 20 0 La Quints City Fire Responses Monthly Totals cn _ 'Q w N N LL N L Q 0 C Fe N L � OLL w U N (n U .Q -� cn 0)(n N M � LL ■ April-01 ■ May-01 0 June-01 A ril-01 Ma -01 June-01 Medical Aids 70 101 103 False Alarms 0 0 0 Structure Fire 6 8 11 Vegetation Fires 0 1 3 Ringing Alarms 35 29 36 Other Fires 11 11 11 Public Service Assists 6 10 5 Fire Menace Standby 9 4 2 TOTALS 137 164 171 597 70 50 .e 991 20 10 C La Quinta City Fire Responses Monthly Breakdown ■ Medical Aids ■ False Alarms 0 Structure Fire ❑ Vegetation Fires ■ Ringing Alarms ■ Other Fires ■ Public Service Assists Fire Menace Standby Apri I-01 A ril-01 Medical Aids 70 False Alarms 0 Structure Fire 6 Vegetation Fires 0 Rin in Alarms 35 Other Fires 11 Public Service Assists 6 Fire Menace Standby 9 598 120 iTe Al 40 20 0 La Quinta City Fire Responses Monthly Breakdown ■ Medical Aids ■ False Alarms ❑ Structure Fire ❑ Vegetation Fires ■ Ringing Alarms ■ Other Fires ■ Public Service Assists Fire Menace Standby May-01 Ma -01 Medical Aids 101 False Alarms 0 Structure Fire 8 Vegetation Fires 1 Ringing Alarms 29 Other Fires 11 Public Service Assists 10 Fire Menace Standby 4 599 120 100 .c X 20 C La Quinta City Fire Responses Monthly Breakdown ■ Medical Aids ■ False Alarms 0 Structure Fire ❑ Vegetation Fires ■ Ringing Alarms ■ Other Fires ■ Public Service Assists 0 Fire Menace Standby June-01 June-01 Medical Aids 103 False Alarms 0 Structure Fire 11 Vegetation Fires 3 Ringing Alarms 36 Other Fires 11 Public Service Assists 5 Fire Menace Standby 2 600 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 Continued Public Hearing: a) Pursuant to Section 2.04.130 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, Determination of the Scope of Participation in the Hearing; b) Public Hearing to Consider Appeals to the City Council of the Planning Commission Decision to Allow Deviation from the Public Works Department Approved Mass Grading Plan for the Property Located on the North Side of Avenue 54, Between Jefferson Street and Madison Street ACTION REQUIRED PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARING: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: I Prior to opening the Public Hearing, Pursuant to Section 2.04.130 of the La Quinta Municipal Code the City Council shall determine the following: A. Limit participation in the hearing to the directly interested parties; or B. Allow participation by the public. RECOMMENDATION: Uphold the Planning Commission approval of the deviation from the mass grading plan. BACKGROUND: The City Council, at its August 7, 2001 meeting, continued this item to allow the appellants time to resolve their issues. As of this date, staff has been informed by Country Club of the Desert that no meeting has taken place. The appellants, Joan Brooke, David and Chang Stein-Roberdes, Mervyn E. Kirshner, and PGA West Residential Association, Inc., submitted appeals relating to the decision of the Planning Commission to allow deviation from the mass grading plans for the Country Club of the Desert. The City Council at its November 21, 2000 meeting, approved the Specific Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map for Country Club of the Desert generally located on the north side of Avenue 54 between Jefferson Street and Monroe Street. Tract Map 29894 subdivided 988 acres into 819 residential lots and golf, common area, street, and miscellaneous lots. 601 n.�nrmTomT� a�m_�nnr� _.L�_ o ^? n1 .-A The City Council, at its June 19, 2001 meeting, adopted a Resolution granting conditional approval of a final map and subdivision improvement agreement for Tract 29894-2 (Attachment 1). An unrelated issue was raised by Council Member Adolph and members of the public about the Planning Commission's action regarding the berm height along Avenue 54. The City Attorney concluded that an appeal from the Planning Commission would be governed by the general appeal provision of the Municipal Code (Section 204.100). The City Attorney also pointed out that neither the Specific Plan approved by the City Council, nor the City Code sets a limitation on the berm height. This general appeals procedure provides a 10-day window in which a person who becomes apprised of an action may request written notification of the action and within ten days of receipt of the notification, the person may file an appeal. The Planning Commission, at its May 22, 2001 meeting, approved the deviation from the Public Works Department approved mass grading plan (Attachment 2). Along Avenue 54 the developer has deviated from the mass grading plan in that the berm heights, at their highest point, now reach a height of 21 feet above the grade of Avenue 54 with an average of 16 feet in height above the grade of Avenue 54. The walls will be located below the top of the berm along the street frontage. The wall setback varies between 15 to 25 feet for an average of 20 feet from the ultimate right of way. Plans will be available at the meeting. Appellant's Request: Each of the appellants submitted the same "Summary of Grounds for Appeal" as an attachment to their appeals application (Attachment 3). Staff has reviewed each of the issues and addresses them as follows: 1. Insufficient Notice of Hearing; and 2. Insufficient Consideration Given to Rights of Adjacent Property Owners Planning Commission approval pertains only to the deviation of the Public Works mass grading plan and does not involve any modification to the Tentative Tract Map and/or the Specific Plan. The Community Development Director has the discretion to send the mass grading plans to the Planning Commission to ensure it is consistent with its decision. This review process does not require a public hearing or public notice. The appellants refer to Section 9.200.1 10 of the Municipal Code with regard to their argument that they were entitled to notice of the Planning Commission action. Section 9.200.110 only applies to "development review actions." "Development review actions" as used in the Municipal Code, include the land use decisions listed in Table 9.23 of the Municipal Code (e.g., General Plan Amendments, Zone Changes, etc.). The approval or modification of the mass grading plan does not fit within the scope of that term. Normally, mass grading plans are approved by City staff. There are no public notice or public hearing requirements relating to such decisions. Instead those items are processed by staff, which reviews the plans to ensure consistency with the approved Conditions of Approval. 602 u02 P:\CHRISTI\ccStfRptCCDevberm8-7-01.wpd 3. Inconsistency with the Specific Plan The Specific Plan Section 4.4.1 Streetscapes references Exhibit 17 as the streetscape component for perimeter roadways. This exhibit states, "Vine covered chain link fence on top of + /- 4'-0" min. berm." The chain link was changed as part of the Conditions of Approval to wrought iron or tubular steel. Also, the fence is now proposed off the top of the berm and will be located 15 to 25 feet away from back of curb. Therefore, the grading plan is consistent with the Specific Plan. Section 1.4: The appellants state that the proposed berming along Avenue 54 is not, per the Specific Plan, "Compatible with and complementary to other surrounding development in the area." They further state that the berm is out of character with all roads in La Quinta. The development pattern of County Club of the Desert along Avenue 54 and Jefferson Street is unique in that there are no other golf course developments in the City where the golf course in its entirety, encircles the houses. However, compatibility does exist in that the proposed berm replaces typical development patterns of other neighborhoods where the rear yards of houses abut the perimeter street. In those situations, a combination of berming and wall is closer to the street and the wall is on top of the berm. The highest berm/wall combinations are Lake La Quinta at 15-feet high along Avenue 48 and Rancho La Quinta at 16-feet along Washington Street. Both berm/wall combinations are five feet closer to the back of curb than the ridge of the Country Club of the Desert's berm along Avenue 54. Additionally, the wall is at the top of the berm whereas Country Club of the Desert is below the ridge of the berm. Section 4.4.3: The appellants state that the proposed berming does not, per the Specific Plan, have "gracefully meandering berms, layered landscape and a security barrier placed on top of the berm." The proposed berm will undulate along the entire length of Avenue 54 between Jefferson and Madison Streets. The proposed landscape plan proposes a layered design concept with the formal plantings consisting of groundcover, shrubs, minimal turf! Palm and other tree species along the street and behind the wall. Native grasses will cover the berm. Lastly, with regards to security, the wall proposed along the back of the landscape setback provides similar security as would a wall on top of the berm. The wall height along Avenue 54 will remain at 6 feet from the landscape setback side. Also, moving the wall away from the berm will soften the view impact from the street. Exhibit 26 (page 4-17) (Attachment 4): The appellants are requesting that the berming along Avenue 54 be modified to match the conceptual design of the berming, as shown in the exhibit, along Avenue 52. However, the conceptual design has similar language regarding berm height, "+/- 5'0" high slump block wall on 3'0" min. high berm vines on fence." The approved wall/berm for Avenue 52 are a maximum ten feet high from the grade of the street and set back 15-25 feet from the ultimate right- of - way. P:\CHRISTI\ccStflZptCCDevberm8-7-01.wpd 603 u03 4. Insufficient Cause to Deviate From the Grading Plan The modification to the mass grading plan reflects a design preference by the Country Club of the Desert. This issue would be best addressed by the developer. 5. Relief Requested From the City Council The request by the appellants is to either, 1) deny the berm height deviation from the mass grading plan and show a maximum of an eight foot high berm along Avenue 54; or 2) return the item to the Planning Commission as a Public Hearing. As discussed previously the Specific Plan does not specify a maximum berm height, but does state that a minimum berm height of four feet is allowed. Therefore, the proposed deviation does not require a specific plan amendment and need not be returned to the Planning Commission. RECOMMENDATION: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Uphold the Planning Commission approval of the deviation to the Public Works Department mass grading plan; or 2. Deny the request to deviate from the Public Works Department mass grading plan; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Jerry Herman Community Development Director Approved for submission by: L Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. City Council Minutes of June 19, 2001 2. Planning Commission Minutes of May 22, 2001 3. Appellant's "Summary of Grounds to Appeal" 4. Specific Plan Exhibit 26 nww u04 P:\CHRISTI\ccStfRptCCDevberm8-7-0Lwpd 6 �`3 ATTACHMENTS 605 005 ATTACHMENT #1 City Council Minutes 2 June 19, 2001 David Roberdes, 54-015 Southern Hills, spoke regarding the height of a berm along Avenue 54 at the Country Club of the Desert development and expressed concern that it will heavily impact the views of PGA West residents. He also stated PGA West residents were not notified of the Planning Commission hearing to change the height of the berm. Wayne LeBlang, 54-51 1 Southern Hills, also spoke in opposition to the berm height and presented photographs of the area. Michael Raines, 54-533 Southern Hills, stated he was opposed to the berm height and voiced concern that it might cause a "venturi' effect. Robert Tyler, 44-215 Villeta Drive, spoke regarding Council's upcoming consideration of a contract with Waste Management and noted the 64-gallon recycling containers have been omitted from the resolution. Rob Ballew, 43-930 San Pablo, Palm Desert, of Family YMCA of the Desert, invited the Council to attend VIP Day at Camp Oakes on June 27, 2001. Mervyn Kirshner, 54-063 Southern Hills, expressed concern that the berm height along Avenue 54 would restrict light and air flow and create a canyon effect. Council Member Adolph stated he has a problem with the grading at Country Club of the Desert and questioned the appropriateness of the Planning Commission approving the berm height without bringing it back to Council for final approval. He wished to discuss the issue under the Tract Map approval (Consent Item No. 10). City Attorney Jenson advised there is a minimum height requirement for the berm but not a maximum height. She further advised the 15-day appeal period since the Planning Commission approval has expired. A Council Member Adolph request Consent Item No. 10 be moved to Business Session Item No. 9 and that Consent Item Ra, 8 be pulled for separate action. 606 006 City Council Minutes 13 Planning Commission: Jury 19, 2001 The following applicants gave a brief presentation on eir background and qualifications: Steve Robbins Richard Butler Mervyn Kirshner David Thoms (Paul Strohecker, Rick Lantz, Willia amilton, Roderick Royer, James Booth, Michael Zellner, Donna Nelson, Th as Gorney, Stuart Roth, and Mark Diamon were not present) Ballot No. 1 Council Member Adolp voted for Steve Robbins and Richard Butler Council Membe/df rson voted for Steve Robbins and Richard Butler Council Membes voted for Steve Robbins and Richard Butler Council Memboted for Steve Robbins and Richard Butler Mayor Pena vol Steve Robbins and Richard Butler MOTION - I was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to appoint Steve Robbins a d Richard Butler to two-year terms on the Planning Commission effective July 1, 2001. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2001- Council r,icessed to and until 7:00 p.m. 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT Judy LeBlang, 54-511 Southern Hills, spoke against Tract Map approval 29894-2 based on the berm issue. Mike Raines, 54-533 Southern Hills, spoke against the berm height along Avenue 54 at the County Club of the Desert development. 607 u07 City Council Minutes 14 June 19, 2001 Jeannine Puglisi, 80-679 Oak Tree, also spoke in opposition to the berm height and �7 questioned the earth moving activity during early mourning hours at the site. - None PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. PUBLIC HEARION LANDSCAPE &LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 89-1 FISCAL YEAR 2001 /2002. Public Works DirectN Vogt presented the staff report. Council Member AdolpPk questioned how long this rate has been in effect. Council Member Henders n remarked it hasn't been increased because of Proposition 218. The Mayor declared the PUBLIV HEARING OPEN at 7:09 p.m. and there being no requests to speak, the May declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 7:12 p.m. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUN IL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRA AND ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 /2002 ASSESSMENT DISTR T NO. 89-1 (pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Hende on to adopt Resolution No. 2001-81 as submitted. Motion carried unanimous . 2. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER C TIFICATION OF AN ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 1; GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-078, AND ZONE CHANGE 2001-101 T\5A ANDS CURRENTLY DESIGNATED TOURIST COMMERCIAL TNSITY RESIDENTIAL; SPECIFIC PLAN 121-E, AMENDMENT #SHING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDETHE CONSTRUCTION OF 65 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, COMMONLITIES AND AN AMENDMENT OF THE LANDSCAPING PLANSITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-703 FOR THE DEVELOPMENR THE 608 uu City Council Minutes 28 June 19, 2001 9. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 29894-2, COUNTRY CLUB OF THE DESERT, LLC. (This item was moved from the Consent Calendar.) Public Works Director Vogt presented the staff report and explained the conditional approval process which includes bonding for improvements. Council Member Adolph asked if grading was a part of the improvements, to which Mr. Vogt responded "no." In response to Council Member Adolph, City Attorney Jenson stated the 15-day appeal time period she referred to earlier, applies to development review actions and permits. She 'felt the current situation may fall under a general appeal provision of the Code because neither the Specific Plan approved by Council nor the City Code sets a limitation on the berm height. The Community Development Director presented the modified grading plan to the Planning Commission to make sure it is consistent with what the Planning Commission had in mind. She advised the general appeal time period for issues other than development review actions is 10 days from when written notice is received. When there is no written notice, the general appeal provision of the Code provides a 10-day window in which a person who becomes apprized of the situation may request written notification and upon receipt of that notification file an appeal within 10 days. In response to Mayor Pena, Ms. Jenson advised the Community Development Director has discretion to approve minor changes, such as landscape material or streetscape design, without an amendment to the Specific Plan. Council Member Adolph questioned raising the berm height to 20 feet being a minor change. Ms. Jenson referred to Condition No. 32, which deals with the slopes, and stated the slopes cannot exceed 5 to 1 within the public right-of-way and in the private areas the slopes cannot exceed 3 to 1. She felt the grading plan is consistent with that condition. She further stated the EIR does not indicate a view impact and that the street scape would be compatible with streets and entries just south of the site. Council Member Adolph noted the renderings presented to Council during approval of the project did not show a "mountain range" along Avenue 54 and was a totally different concept than what currently exists. 609 009 City Council Minutes 29 June 19, 2001 Council Member Henderson asked if this issue was taken to the Planning Commission as a business item, to which Mr. Herman responded yes. Nancy Aaronson, 81-100 Avenue 53, of Country Club of the Desert, noted the request for final map approval is a separate issue from the grading. She felt it would be an infringement upon the developer's rights if the conditional approval is not approved. In response to Mayor Pena, Ms. Jenson confirmed the Council has the right to continue this item to a future meeting. Ms. Aaronson stated she felt the grading should have been apparent for some time given the stockpiling of dirt along Avenue 54. Mayor Pena noted it did appear to be a "stockpile" and not necessarily a permanent berm. Ms. Aaronson stated she felt a majority of the Planning Commissioners were initially opposed to the grading based on their field visit and seeing the berms in their current form but approved the grading based on the merits of the design. She noted the berms are less bulk and mass than the 28-foot high homes that could have been built along the perimeter. She further noted a lot of the trees on the PGA West side of Avenue 54 are 60-70 feet high from the streetscape and that Country Club of the Desert would have similar "view obstruction" issues if they had existed prior to PGA West being approved. In regard to complaints of vehicle noise at night, she stated they are committed to controlling dust from the project and sometimes run water trucks at night. She stated they wish to be good neighbors and hope the PGA West residents will be more supportive of the finished product. Council Member Adolph stated he had discussed his concerns about the berm height with staff over the last few months and understood the berm would be lowered. Mayor Pena noted the berm issue is not a part of the item before Council at this time and should be addressed in some other manner. Council Member Sniff agreed and noted the residents who have an issue with the berm should file an appeal. Ms. Aaronson stated they wish to go on record that they have moved forward with their grading construction based on approvals from the City. 610 010 City Council Minutes 30 June 19, 2001 Jim Donnelly, 56-548 Pebble Beach, asked to speak to the City Attorney regarding the berm issue and Mayor Pena suggested he speak to her after the meeting. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-88 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING CONDITIONAL FINAL MAP APPROVAL OF TRACT 29894-2 AND AUTHORIZING A TIME EXTENSION FOR SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO VALIDATE THE APPROVAL. It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to adopt Resolution No. 2001-88 as submitted. In response to Council Member Adolph, Ms. Jenson confirmed if an appeal is filed it will come before Council but noted the developer could argue that the general appeal process does not apply. She further confirmed the filing of an appeal will not delay the applicant's final map approval. Council Member Perkins noted this has placed the Council in an awkward position and stated he wished to avoid having something like this happen again. Mayor Pena stated he felt the issue of berm heights should be revisited with planning staff. Motion carried unanimously. 7. CONS RATION OF A MEETING SCHEDULE REGARDING VISTA SANTA ROSA. (This item was c tinued from Page 8.) After a brief discussion, ouncil concurred to direct staff o schedule a Study Session on July 5, 20011 7:00 p.m. with interested rties to include Supervisor Wilson, all persons o spoke at the LAFCO hearin and the Vista Santa Rosa Community Council. STUDY SESSION - None 61, 011' ATTACHMENT 2 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 VI. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Tract Map 29894; a request of Country Club of the Desert for a deviation from the Public Works Department approved mass grading plan for the property located on the north side of Avenue 54 between Jefferson Street and Madison Street. 1. Chairman Robbins asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Robbins asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to clarify Attachment 1 as to whether or not it had been approved by Council. Staff stated the design details for the perimeter landscaping were conceptual when approved and the height of the berm was not defined until the mass grading plan was submitted. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to clarify what the Code required in regard to the wall, sidewalk, and height. Staff did so. 3. Chairman Robbins asked if there was a wall proposed. Staff stated it is proposed to be set back a distance ranging 15 to 25 feet along Avenue 54. Chairman Robbins questioned the 3:1 slope behind the wall. 4. Commissioner Butler asked how this occurred without staff knowing it. Staff stated that since they have not completed the grading there was no need to inspect it. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated that for any project other than a golf course, the pad elevations would be defined and they would have to grade to that plan. During the course of grading for a golf course, the City's inspectors do not check detailed elevations and the developer grades at their own risk. At the completion of the grading they are required to submit a certificate to the City certifying that the grading was completed to the approved plans. In this instance, there is no doubt they have deviated from the approved plan. , 5. Commissioner Kirk reviewed the approval process and asked why it was now before the Commission. Staff clarified that when the wall plans were submitted for approval, the grading issue was brought to staff's attention. Commissioner Kirk asked if staff had a recommendation. Staff stated they did not. 612 ul 12 r;-\WPnnCS\PC5-22-01.wpd 2 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 6. Chairman Robbins stated it appears the golf course is 20 + feet below the street so the golf course is in a 40 foot hole below the top of the berm. 7. Commissioner Butler asked if there were any City codes that would allow this type of berm to be approved. Staff stated there are some issues in regard to this because in some instances a noise issue may require a higher berms than normal, such as in the case of Rancho La Quinta and Lake La Quinta. Commissioner Butler stated he did not entirely object to the berm. 8. Commissioner Abels asked what the height of the berm would be at its highest point with the wall on top. Staff stated the wall will not be on the top of the berm. It will be near the bottom and six feet in height. 9. Commissioner Tyler asked if there was a site plan for the interior of the project. Staff stated the applicant would address this. 10. Chairman Robbins asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Ms. Nancy Aaronson, representing Country Club of the Desert, stated they are trying to find a location for excess dirt on the site. They are trying to balance the dirt out over the entire project. Aesthetically from inside the project the berming is essential to protect the value of the project. They had two different grading plans approved for their project. One was the right of way and the other was for the golf course. Steve Garcia, landscape architect for the project, showed photographs that had been taken of the site. The dirt is stockpiled and will be sculptured at a later date. Within the right of way they have maintained the 3:1 slope with a meandering sidewalk. The wall is set back to be no closer than 15 feet from the right of way. Discussion followed as to the landscaping materials that would be used and the grading elevations on both sides of the berm. 11. Chairman Robbins asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Kirk asked if the Specific Plan required the landscaping to match the other side of Avenue 54. Staff stated yes. Mr. Garcia stated their plans calls for a maximum 30% turf in the perimeter right of way area. 12. Commissioner Butler asked what type of vegetation would be used on the berm. Mr. Garcia stated desert perennials and drought tolerant shrubs. 6 13 v 13 G:\WPD0CS\PC5-22-01.wpd 3 Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2001 13. Commissioner Tyler stated there would be a fantastic view to the south, but the height of the berm would mask the view of the mountains. - Mr. Garcia stated the reason for the height was to hide the view of roof tops at PGA West. 14. Commissioner Kirk asked at what point they were viewing the south view. Mr. Garcia stated at the end of the residential cul-de- sacs. 15. There being no further discussion, it was before the Commission for discussion. 16. Commissioner Kirk stated he believes the applicant has made a point in that if houses were built there it would be a hardscape and this softscape is a relief. His concern is that they do not know how the berm will be sculptured. If there is to be no more dirt to be added he would have no objection. 17. Commissioner Abels stated it was a nice presentation and he would have no objections. 18. Commissioner Butler stated he likes the concept of buffering the golf course from the street. He supports the project. 19. Commissioner Tyler stated that driving by presently it is like driving through the Grand Canyon. There has been a lot of concern voiced by the residents of PGA West. He had strong objections and after the presentation his opinion is somewhat tempered. 20. Chairman Robbins stated he too was concerned after driving by, but after hearing the presentation and the intent of the applicant, he does like the concept. 21. Commissioner Tyler asked if this concept would be carried all the way down Avenue 54. Ms. Aaronson stated yes. 22. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Butler to adopt Minute Motion 2001 -011 approving the deviation to the approved mass grading plan for Tract Map 29894. Unanimously approved. 614"14 G:\WPDOCS\PC5-22-01.wpd 4 M 11:80 FAZ 1' 760 U3 1788 S 5 A S ATTACHMENT #3 �)Insuffidem ce of : It is submitted that notice of the hearing before the Platubg Commission on the Country Club of the Desert's (uCCDO request for permission to maintain a berm in access of twenty he along Avenue 54 should have been given in accordance with 'Section 9.200.110 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Among other things, Applicant complaim that such notice was not given pursuant to 9.200.11 OD. l .e. (mailing to allowners within 5W of the subject property) and 9.200.110.D.2 (publication in a newspaper of general circulation). It is submitted that notice to, and the presence og owners at PGA West would have been beneficial to the Planning Commission in evaluating all sides of the berm issue. 2) : Due perhaps in part to the absence of notice to the owners at PGA West, there was insufficient contemplation or consideration given to the impact of the 20'+ berm to the homeowners at PGA West which is adjacent to the berm. Among other things, the berm blocks the view of such owners to the mountain range to the north of PGA West. Furthermore, the berm is unsightly, out of character, and an extraordinary deviation from the other berms in the City of La Quinta and the project itself. By way of example, the proposed berm planned for Avenue 52 on the other side of the project is planned at only three feet. 3) Inconsistency With the Specific Alan: The proposed berm is inconsistent with the specific plan, and its objectives, for, among other things,, the following reasons: a. Section 1.4., bullet point 6 of the Specific Plan ("SP"), identifies the objective of assuring that the project is "compatible with and complementary to other surrounding development in the area" (SP, page 1-6.) A 20+' berm does not compliment PGA West and is inconsistent with, and out of character for, any road in La Quinta. b. Section 4.4.3, subheading "Perimeter Walls & Fends" (SP, page 4-13) , describes the planned perimeter walls and fences as "gracefully meandering berms, layered landscape and a seauty barrier placed on top of the boning." The berm is in excess of 20' in height, it is not graceful, it does not meander, and there is no security barrier planned for installation at the top thereof. C. Exhibit 26 (SP, page 4-1 7) depicts a 3' berm along Avenue 52, which such berm height would be consistent with the Specific Plan. In contrast, a 20+' berm is inconsistent with the Specific Plan and any other such area in La Quinta. 4) Insufficient Cause to Deviate From the Cm ding Plan: The only concrete explanation offered by CCD for the 20' berm was that CCD was attempting to attempt "find a location for excess dirt on the site." It is submitted that, given the interests of the owners at PGA West, the better alternative would be for CCD to simply haul its "excess dirt" off the development site and to properly dispose of it. The creation of a berm of this height is not an appropriate K* ATAVMPGA.ASS*121 X t 1201U 1 »A)A 015 ��• �� w �� • • •�� • 1 YY Y•Y i / YV d d • v � yv, • solution and any convenience to CCD is far outweighed by the burden imposed on the owners at PGA West, Bdief Bt -nested From the City Council 1) Request is made. that the City Council reverse the approval of the Planning Commission on May 22, 2001, and order that the application for deviation be denied and that Country pub of the Desert construct the berm at a height no greater than eight feet as originally depicted in the approved mass grading plan or at other height which will reasonably presave the northerniy view of the owners at PGA West; or 2) In the alternative, request is made that the City Council refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for further review and study on the impact of the proposed berm on the views of the owners at PGA West and to conduct a duly noticed public hearing on the application for deviation to allow all concerned parties to participate in such hearing. r [.'1DATA1PTOA.44=12170.1 1201\IIJ7AM 2 6 1 V y 1 6 4A ATTACHMENT #4' N 9 a �aa55 v t W W 3 a 0 �a E m� u 1'7 Ico0617 T a 0 4&t 4 sep a" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Public Hearing to Consider Amendments to PUBLIC HEARING: Miscellaneous Sections of Title 9 (Zoning Code) and Title 13 (Subdivision Regulations) of the La Quinta Municipal Code RECOMMENDATION: Introduce an Ordinance amending miscellaneous sections of Title 9 (Zoning Code) and Title 13 (Subdivision Regulations) of the La Quinta Municipal Code: Move to take up Ordinance No. Move to introduce Ordinance No. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: by title and number only and waive further reading. on first reading. Several minor changes are proposed to the Zoning Code and one change to the Subdivision Regulations to allow better interpretation and implementation. Included in the proposed regulations are changes to standards for parking spaces, walls, single family development, signs, and to the development processing procedures. The Planning Commission reviewed and recommended certain text changes at their meeting of July 24, 2001 (Attachment 1) by adopting Resolution 2001-104. P:\STAN\ZCA2001-070(CCreport).wpd Recommended changes: A brief explanation of each change is provided below. Additionally, staff is suggesting the City Council consider modifications to the Planning Commission's recommendations as explained in paragraphs 5, 6, and 16 below: 1. Section 9.50.090 (A), (B), and (C). This section removes the requirement for Master Design Guidelines for the La Quinta Cove. At this time, any builder who builds five or more houses in the Cove must have architectural guidelines approved by the Planning Commission. This change is recommended because site inspections by staff currently ensure that proposed building plans provide architectural variation within 200 feet. 2. Section 9.50.090 (B). The Planning Commission recommendation included a conditional use permit procedure for affordable housing. Upon further review, the City Attorney believes this change may be inconsistent with Government Code Section 65915 and various other State statutes that seek to encourage development of affordable housing across the state. Accordingly, staff proposes elimination of this section and has deleted it from the Ordinance. 3. Section 9.60.030 (C) (4). This section currently requires a corner cutback for walls and fences within residential land use districts "between two points located on and a 20 foot distant from the point of intersection of two ultimate street right-of-ways." The Public Works Department finds that the cutback is not necessary because, in most cases, the dedicated right-of-way between the curb and property line is 12 feet. This right-of-way provides sufficient visibility at corners to preserve motorist site distance. 4. Section 9.60.030 (C). The fences and walls section is proposed to undergo several text amendments. 1) The first will increase the maximum fence height between residential and non-residential properties from six to eight feet. This would provide for greater privacy and noise reduction for the residential properties. 2► The second proposal is to increase the maximum height for entry arches and trellises attached to courtyard walls from eight to nine feet. 5. Section 9.60.045. This new section proposes regulations regarding built-in structures such as barbeques, waterfalls, fireplaces, and fountains. Location of these structures is not currently addressed in the Zoning Code. The Planning Commission eliminated Subsections 2, 3, and 4. However, staff would like the City Council to consider including these sections because eliminating them deletes regulations that are intended to preserve the integrity of the side yard from massive structural intrusions. Without them, for example, homeowners would be able to build a fireplace on the property line to the height permitted within the district. Staff recommends the City Council consider retaining Subsections 2, 3 and 4 as bolded. 619 u02 P:\STAN\ZCA2001-070(CC report).wpd Section 9.60.045. Barbeques, waterfalls, fountains, fireplaces, and similar structures. A. Applicability. Permanently installed freestanding barbeques, waterfalls, fountains, fireplaces, and similar structures such as permanently installed tables and benches, etc., may be constructed on a residential lot containing a primary residence. B. Standards. Freestanding barbeques, waterfalls, fountains, fireplaces, and similar structures shall comply with the following requirements: 1. Said construction of structures, except freestanding firepiae�—are allowed within the required front, side, or rear setbacks, including adjacent to a property line. In side yard areas, a single clear passageway of five feet wide shall be provided. 2. Allowed construction of structures shall not be attached to property line walls or fences, and shall meet all required distance clearances (i.e., for barbeques, fireplaces). 3. Within five feet of any property line, the height of the feature or construction shall not exceed the height of the closest wall or fence. If no wall or fence exists, the construction or feature shall not exceed the height of the wall allowed along the property line in question. 4. Outdoor fireplaces shall not be closer than five feet from a property line, except when adjacent to permanent open space such as a golf course, common landscape or hardscape area, drainage channel, etc., in which case it may be within three feet of the property line. The height of the chimney may be up to six feet unless required to be higher to comply with building code requirements. In such cases, the height shall not be higher than the minimum height required. 6. Section 9.60.070.B(2). This section of the Code has been clarified with respect to the use and placement of pool equipment within a residential yard. The recommendation from the Planning Commission regarding the placement of mechanical pool equipment reads: 2. Filter and Heating Equipment. Use of equipment shall comply with the following requirements: 620 003 P:\STAN\ZCA2001-070(CCreport).wpd a. Mechanical pool equipment, such as a pump, filter or heater, may be located within the required front, or rear yard setback areas. The equipment shall be immediately enclosed on at least three sides by a masonry wall with an open side not visible to the street with the exception of a raef. . b. Mechanical pool eauipment maybe in an area between th side property line and residence provided a five foot side yard, clear of any permanent obstructions is maintained between the side yard property line and any mechanical pool eauipment. A five foot side vard, clear of anV •In 11 ILIMWA-*Vlklj ILVII. i PWIF c. Where there is no side property line wall, mechanical pool equipment may be in a side yard of five feet or less only if a recorded easement in perpetuity exists for the subject property to use the adjacent side yard of the abutting property for access at a minimum five foot distance between the equipment and adjacent obstruction (i.e., building wall). Equipment shall be screened frorn vi from the street when in the front yard. In additi of perimeter walls or fencing (if perm 0 tted), screen walls, or landscape planting. 3. Fencing Requirements. All pools shall be fenced in accordance with the provisions of the City's Building Code Chapter 8.06 state law and other applicable laws and ordinances. 4. Screening shall be provided as required in Section 9.60.140.B(2). The Building and Safety Department interprets that pool equipment does not need a separate walled enclosure if it is surrounded by a perimeter property line wall and cannot be seen from the street. Staff is recommending that the word "immediately", as bolded above, be deleted from this subsection. 7. Section 9.60.075. The addition of ground mounted mechanical equipment (air conditioning condensers) location requirements is recommended. This section will be similar to pool equipment development standards. The wall enclosure required for pool equipment was not recommended for this equipment. 62-I u04 PASTAWWA2001-070(CCreport).wpd 8. Section 9.60.160 (3). The Planning Commission is recommending an addition to the outdoor lighting standards currently required in the Cove Residential District as follows: 3. All exterior lighting shall be located and directed so as not to shine directly on adjacent properties and shall comply with Section 9.100.150. 9. Section 9.60.240 (E). This revision requires that planting and obstructions be limited in height at intersections to ensure vehicular and pedestrian visibility. 10. Section 9.60.250 (E). As currently worded, a "guarantee" is required for model home complexes prior to approval. This guarantee amount and type is not specifically stated. This section, as recommended by the Planning Commission, proposes to specify that a $1,000 cash deposit be required. This change simplifies the process and provides the same standard for all developers. 1 1 . Section 9.60.300 (1) (1). The Planning Commission recommended deleting the latter portion of the sentence regarding construction of two story homes in partially constructed subdivisions thereby offering more protection to existing homeowners, as follows: I. Development Standards for Compatibility Review. No residential unit shall be approved under compatibility review unless the Planning Commission determines that it complies with the following development standards: 1. A two-story house shall not be constructed adjacent to or abutting a lot line of an existing single -story home constructed in a prior phase of the same subdivision unless proof can be provided showing that a two story unit was proposed for the lot by the prior builde.. 12. Section 9.65.030 (A) (1) and (3). In consideration of the recent improvements within the Village (e.g., including sidewalks, on -street parking and parking lots), front setbacks and in -lieu parking lot fees are eliminated. 13. Section 9.65.040 (D) and (E). Currently, the development review process for a Village Use Permit is complicated and difficult to utilize. Therefore, some of the requirements have been rewritten to clarify wording and provide for easier implementation. 14. Section 9.65.040. This section currently contains a typo. Subsection G has been mislabeled as E. Staff is requesting that this error be corrected. 15. Section 9.100.150 (G). Pursuant to City Council direction, the restriction which prohibited internally illuminated awnings is being deleted. 642W 2 u 0 5 P:\STAN\ZCA2001-070(CCreport).wpd 16. Section 9.150.060, Table 9-11. This section allows one parking space of a three car garage to be a tandem space. Therefore, a three car garage would require less width along the front of a residence. The Planning Commission also recommends deleting an amendment to this table. Currently, a residence with four or more bedrooms (as defined by the Zoning Code and Uniform Building Code) requires a three car garage. However, a three bedroom residence owner other than the original builder can convert a third garage space to a bedroom (creating a four bedroom residence), if the value or cost of the conversion does not raise the value of the residence by 50% or more. This results in a two car garage for a "new" four bedroom residence. Staff has processed a large number of conversions following the close of escrow by the original builder for the new homeowner. For example, staff presently has a request by Century Homes on behalf of 13 new homeowners to convert 13 single garage spaces to bedrooms, thus creating four bedroom homes. Frequently, the initial garage construction includes preparatory work to facilitate the conversion to a bedroom. The revision as recommended by the Planning Commission is as follows: Table 9-1 1 - Minimum off-street parking requirement for homes with four or more bedrooms. Same as above but with three spaces per unit in a garage. One garage space of the three spaces may be provided in tandem. For additions raising total number of bedrooms to four or more, third garage space is not required provided addition does not increase value of house by 50% or more as determined by Director of Building and Safety. Existing lots of 6,000 square feet or less and affordable housing, this re "_fs optional projects are exempt. Based upon the previous discussion, staff is suggesting additional language to the Planning Commission recommendation as follows: Same as above but with three spaces per unit in a garage. One garage space of the three spaces may be provided in tandem. For additions constructed outside of the existing building walls raising the total number of bedrooms to four or more, a third garage space is not required provided that the addition does not increase value of house by 50% or more as determined by Director of Building and Safety. Interior conversions which create four bedrooms or more are required to provide three spaces in a garage. Existing lots of 6,009 6,500 square feet or less, and affordable housing, this re it is optional projects are exempt. 17. Section 9.150.080 (B) (1). Currently this section requires the width of all regular parking space to be nine feet. Per City Council direction, the width is now increased to ten feet. IG ell P:\STAN\ZCA2001-070(CCreport).wpd 18. Section 9.150.080 (B) (7). The Planning Commission recommends amending this section to require double striping instead of single striping for parking lots. This section does not apply to attached or detached single family residences. 19. Section 9.160.100. This revision prohibits translucent or transparent signs and lettering on awnings that allow light to shine through the signs and lettering. This proposed change will require signs on awnings be opaque and not allow light to shine through them. 20. Section 9.200.1 10 (D). This amendment revises the wording regarding the total number of days public hearings are noticed to provide clarity and consistency with the California Environmental Quality Act. The requirements regarding who is noticed will not change. 21. Section 13.12.170. This section deletes the subdivision requirement regarding recordation of tentative tract map conditions of approval. The City Attorney has determined that requiring recordation of conditions of approval is no longer necessary. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: 1 . Move to take up Ordinance No. by title and number only and waive further reading. Move to introduce Ordinance No. on first reading; or 2. Do not introduce an Ordinance amending miscellaneous sections of Title 9 (Zoning Code) and Title 13 (Subdivision Regulations) of the La Quinta Municipal Code; or 3. Refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for further consideration; or 4. Continue the request and provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, rry HeIrban immunity Development Director Approved for submission by, Phomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Planning Commission Minutes of July 24, 2001 624 (JO7 P:\STAN\ZCA2001-070(CCreport).wpd ORDINANCE No. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO TITLE 9 (ZONING CODE) AND TITLE 13 (SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 2001-070 CITY OF LA QUINTA WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 21" day of August, 2001, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a Zoning Code Amendment regarding revisions to Title 9 (Zoning Code) and Title 13 (Subdivision Regulations); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did on the 24th day of July, 2001, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider revision to Municipal Code Title 9 (Zoning Code) and Title 13 (Subdivision Regulations) within the City of La Quinta; and, WHEREAS, said request has complied with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (as amended), and adopted by City Council Resolution 83-68, in that the Community Development Director has determined that the project could not have any significant adverse effect on the physical environment; therefore, the project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3); and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested person desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify the recommendation for approval of said Zoning Code Amendment. 1. The proposed revisions will not adversely affect the planned development of the City as specified by the General Plan for the City of La Quinta because the regulations provide requirements which work in concert with and enhance the community. 2. The proposed Amendment would not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the City in that they are only procedural changes. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California that it does ordain as follows: P:\Michele\CCord.wpd Page 1 �� t)o$ Ordinance No. Zoning Code 2001-070 SECTION 1. Title 9 (Zoning Code) and Title 13 (Subdivision Regulations) of the La Quinta Municipal Code are hereby amended for the reasons set forth in this Ordinance and as setforth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL. Said Zoning Ordinance Amendment request has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4. POSTING. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21 st day of August, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PEN -A, Mayor City of. La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney 626 U 0 9 City of La Quinta, California P:\Michele\CCord.wpd Page 2 ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT "A" CODE AMENDMENTS - PROPOSED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 2001-070 AUGUST 21, 2001 REVISE - Section 9.50.090 A.0 ) 1.Ai! single family residences shall be reviewed using the 6ove Residen Besign . As a part of the Building and Safety Department plan check for residences in the RC zone district, the Community Development Department shall review the submitted plans and visit proposed site to ensure that the architectural features of the front elevation of the proposed residence has design features that vary from other residences within two hundred feet on the same street, and cross street if the lot is on a corner. DELETE- Section 9.50.090 B. Building Besign Guidelines Multople Approvals. Section 9.50.090 E3. Cove Residentual Design Application Procedures. • • . • • MEN • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • JLqj— • •IN _rqqmwpwArMAVALOILIMPOW qVI PRHPNW pqplo4pml FIVANSWIF• • • VIA"Ll • • . • • • . • • • . • • V 1111111DkIVAIIII 10 1" 0 L-t-7MYLTA Between two points located on and five feet distant frorn the point of intersection of an ultimate street or U %—,y I III of way on one hand and the edge of a driveway or ano 8 ie, a"ey right of way on the other if parkway width is less th 12 feet wade. P:\STAN\zca 2001-070 exh a(CC).wpd Page 1 of 8 64'2 7 010 ORDINANCE NO. CODE AMENDMENTS - PROPOSED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 2001-070 AUGUST 21, 2001 EXHIBIT "A" WJ .. .. .. . ,, 11111 I plop ,.. .. ., ADD - SECTION 9.60.030 C.4. - Adjacent to a nonresidential zone or use. The maximum fence height between a residential zone or use and a nonresidential zone or use shall be eight feet. REVISE - SECTION 9.60.030 C.1.c. - Arches or trellises up to nine eight feet in overall height and five feet interior width may be constructed over a gate on a lot provided the arch/trellis is integrated into the fence/gate design. ADD - SECTION 9.60.045 - Barbeques, waterfalls, fountains, fireplaces and similar structures. A. Applicability. Permanently installed freestanding barbeques, waterfalls, fountains, fireplaces and similar structures such as permanently installed tables and benches, etc., may be constructed on a residential lot containing a primary residence. B. Said construction of structures are allowed within the required front, side, or rear setbacks, including adjacent to a property line. In side yard areas, a single clear passageway of five feet wide shall be provided. REVISE - SECTION 9.60.070 B.2. Filtering and Heating equipment. Use of a. Mechanical pool equipment such as a pump, filter, or heater, may be located within the retuned front or rear yard setback areas. The equipment shall be immediately enclosed on at least three sides by a masonry wall with an open side not visible to the street. with the exception of a roof. b. Mechanical pool equipment may be in an area between the side property line and the residence provided a five-foot side yard, clear of any permanent obstructions is maintained between the side yard property line and any mechanical pool equipment. -- -- ---- --- -- - - -- - - -- - - ---- - • . • • • • . • • p:\stan\zca 2001-070 exh a.wpd Page 2 of 8 6 2" 1 011. ORDINANCE NO. CODE AMENDMENTS - PROPOSED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 2001-070 AUGUST 21, 2001 EXHIBIT "A" C. Where there is no side property line wall, mechanical pool equipment may be in a side yard of five feet or less only if a recorded easement in perpetuity exists for the subject property to use the adjacent side yard of the abutting property for access and a minimum five feet distance between the equipment and adjacent obstruction (i.e. building wall) is provided. . ; . . ... . . . ... . . .. equipment shall comply• • • • ADD - SECTION 9.60.075 GROUND MOUNTED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. Use of equipment shall comply with the following requirements: a. Ground mounted mechanical equipment such as air conditioner condensing units, water softeners, etc. may be located within the rear yard areas. For lots of 5,000 square feet or less, said equipment can be in front yard if there is a wall around the yard or it is screened by a masonry wall. b. Where there is no side property line wall, mechanical equipment may be in an area between the side property line and the residence provided a five-foot side yard, clear of any permanent obstructions is maintained between the side yard property line and any mechanical equipment. C. Mechanical equipment may be in a side yard of five feet or less only if a recorded easement in perpetuity exists for the subject property to use the adjacent side yard of the abutting property for access and a minimum five feet distance between the equipment and adjacent obstruction (i.e. building wall) is provided. ADD - SECTION 9.60.160 OUTDOOR LIGHTING 3. All exterior lighting shall be located and directed so as not to shine directly on adjacent properties and shall comply with Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting). p:\stan\zca 2001-070 exh a.wpd Page 3 of 8 ORDINANCE NO. CODE AMENDMENTS - PROPOSED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 2001-070 AUGUST 21, 2001 EXHIBIT "A" REVISE - SECTION 9.60.240 E.1. - boundar*es shall comply wath Section 9-.60.030 (fences and vvaffs-�-. At intersections or corners of the following public or private streets, alleys, or driveways, the height of shrubs, planting, and other visual obstructions (such as boulders, etc.) shall be limited to a maximum height of 30 inches within the following triangular areas described in subsections i. and ii.: i. At a corner, the area formed on two sides by the straight portions of the intersection of the back of street curb or edge of pavement. The third side of the triangle is formed by drawing a line that is tangent to the intersection of the two closest property lines and creates a triangle of approximately equal length sides with the curbs or edge of pavement. ii. Between two points located on and five feet distant from the point of intersection of an ultimate street or alley right- of-way on one hand and the edge of a driveway or another alley right-of-way on the other if parkway width is less than 12-feet wide. iii. For purposes of this Code, "point of intersection" shall mean the intersection of the prolongation of the street curbs or edge of pavement, excluding any curved portion joining the two lines. iv. Trees may be planted within this triangular area provided the bottom of the canopy (leafy branches) of the tree is at least four feet above finish grade of the street adjacent to the tree. However, trees shall not be planted in such numbers that their trunks create a visibility obstruction for vehicles or pedestrians. REVISE - SECTION 9.60.250 E. - Requirements for approval. Any approving action shall include those conditions and requirements deemed by the decision - making authority to be necessary or advisable to protect the public safety and the general welfare, together with a $1000.00 cash deposit guarantees (bonds, letters of credit, eteJ that the structures and facilities will be removed or made consistent with applicable zoning regulations within 90 days after the expiration of the permit or discontinuation of the use the permit is approved for. p:\stan\zca 2001-070 exh a.wpd Page 4 of 8 630 ORDINANCE NO. CODE AMENDMENTS - PROPOSED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 2001-070 AUGUST 21, 2001 EXHIBIT "A" REVISE - SECTION 9.60.300 1.1. A two-story house shall not be constructed adjacent to or abutting a lot line of an existing single -story home constructed in a prior phase of the same subdivision. unless proof can provided showing that a two story unat was proposed for the lot by the prior Bar. REVISE - SECTION 9.65.030(A) 1. Setbacks. Setback criteria shall be determined based on the existing site conditions and surroundings, in conjunction with the guidelines and the proposed project characteristics. a. Aloirlig La Fonda and Galle Estado, between Avenida Bermudas and Desert %E.3.'ub Dr8 I . iernurn of ten feet must be provided frorn property in nes fronting on those streets and at their intersections, to allow for pedesti- MS. a. Setbacks along front, side and rear property lines are not required; however, any setback provided must be made wide or deep enough to be usable space, such as for pedestrian access to side -loading commercial space, stairwells, or through -access between front and rear of the building(s). c. Arcades, trellises, and smm"ar architectural treatments are exempt f rom setback r bmts, but must be designed to accentuate archotectu, e. d. Upper floors of buildings shall be designed to be set behind the e mmediately lower floor, to achieve a terraced effect. This reduces the appearance of mass to the structure, aovvs for upper floor otitdw- un l- C-3 l- ve C-1 -0 and walkways, and enhances pedestrian seale.- b. Projects with any retail commercial components shall maintain a minimum ten -foot landscaped setback from any RVL, RL or RMH zoned properties. c. No utility equipment shall be allowed above ground in the right-of- way. Such equipment shall be integrated into the footprint of the proposed building. REVISE - SECTION 9.65.030 (A) 3. Parking. Parking area requirements for permitted uses shall be determined by staff as set forth in Chapter 9.150 of the zoning code, with the following consideration: a. All current parking regulations shall be applicable, such as required number of stalls, space and aisle dimensions, location of parking areas, etc. However, in the VC zoning district, variations to any parking standards can be approved. p:\stan\zca 2001-070 exh a.wpd Page 5 of 8 631 44 ORDINANCE NO. CODE AMENDMENTS - PROPOSED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 2001-070 AUGUST 21, 2001 EXHIBIT "A" REVISE - SECTION 9.65.040 D. Village Use Permit Requirements. All new development proposals in the Village Commercial District shall be required to file an application for a village use permit. A "new development proposal" is defined as any of the following: new building construction proposed for vacant property or associated with demolition and reconstruction of an existing building. Village use permits shall be subject to review by the planning commission as a public hearing. 2. Any change of use exceeding fifty percent Wor more of the building percent or more ...i....."Se n the existing building's met floor U-M-C-3. E. Any development proposal in the VC zoning district without prior Village Use Permit approval determined as not meeting the criteria in subsection D of this section shall be subject to review by the Community Development Director . 1. Minor deviations may be approved by the coninitinity developmen-t department witth no public he i - other formal review process. , A monor dev8atno . proposal not meeting the criteria On subsection D of this section, which constitutes a change of less than five percent of any approved or existing building area, columns, dormer vents, vVindow size changes, plant on locations, color and stucco texture changes. 2. Major deviatoons are subject to review and approval by the planning - s on. A major deviation is any proposa not meeting the criteria n Subsection D of this section, which constitutes a change of five percent to twenty-five percent for any approved or existing building area-, any exterior architectural modiflicatlen not determined to be 3. Major deviations shall be processed under the site development permit process, as set forth under Section 9.21 E).E) 10-. 1. Administrative approval may be given by the Community Development Department for any building additions and/or exterior building, architectural design and site modifications that are determined by the Community Development Director to implement the concepts set forth in the "Village at La Quinta Design Guidelines". The Community Development Director may refer the project to the Planning Commission. p:\stan\zca 2001-070 exh a.wpd Page 6 of 8 �`�!'1+ oJ1,5 ORDINANCE NO. CODE AMENDMENTS - PROPOSED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 2001-070 AUGUST 21, 2001 EXHIBIT "A" 2. Additions and exterior building and site modifications that do not fall under subsection 1 above shall be approved the Planning Commission as a public hearing under the Village Use Permit process. REVISE - SECTION 9.65.040 & G. Appeals, Amendments and Time Extensions. Appeals, amendments and time extensions relating to Village use permits shall be reviewed pursuant to Chapter 9.200 of this title... DELETE- SEGTIGN -- - G. Prohibited ...s. The use of lighting inside a transparent or REVISE - Table 9-1 1 of Section 9.150.060 - Minimum off-street parking requirement for homes with four or more bedrooms. Same as above but with three spaces per unit in a garage. One garage space of the three spaces may be provided in tandem. For additions raising total number of bedrooms to four or more, third garage space is not required provided addition does not increase value of house by 50% or more as determined by Director of Building and Safety. Existing lots of 6,000 square feet or less and affordable housing, this requiremen epttonaf projects are exempt. REVISE - Section 9.150.080 B.1. - Regular Space Dimensions. All parking spaces up to the minimum required shall be designated for regular vehicle parking. Regular vehicle spaces shall have the following minimum dimensions: width ten nine feet; length seventeen feet plus two feet overhang: where curbs are not provided, a minimum length of nineteen feet is required. REVISE - Section 9.150.080 B.7. - Space Marking. With the exceptio, i of single family detached, single family attached and duplex residenti All parking spaces in a residential or nonresidential parking lot shall be clearly marked with white or yellow paint or other easily distinguished material with each space marking consisting of a double four inch wide hairpin stripe, twelve inches on -center. Marking shall be a minirnum four ench wide single or double ("hairpin" style) st i. ADD - SECTION 9.160.100 Prohibited Signs. A6 p:\stan\zca 2001-070 exh a.wpd Page 7 of 8 63.1 ORDINANCE NO. CODE AMENDMENTS - PROPOSED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 2001-070 AUGUST 21, 2001 EXHIBIT "A" 24. Translucent or transparent signs on internally illuminated awnings so that they allow light to shine through the letters of the copy. REVISE - Section 9.200.1 10 D. - Noticing Requirements. The lead agency shall provide a review period of not less than 20 calendar days Not less than for projects requiring an environmental assessment. The lead agency shall provide a review period of not less than 10 calendar days Not less than 10 calendar days prior to the hearing, for projects not requiring environmental review. The City shall: Recordation of 6onditions • Approval. days of approval of • . t tract . • • clerk shall submit Riversidethe eond8t8ons of approval of the niap to the for recordation against the property to which they app'V- U 1'7 p:\stan\zca 9.200.1 10 D.wpd Page 8 of 8 634 ATTACHMENT #1 Planning Commission Minutes July 24, 2001 PUBLIC HEARINGS - CONTINUED C. Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2001-070: a request of the City for consideration of miscellaneous amendments to Title 9-Zoning Code and Title 13-Subdivision Ordinance of the La Quinta Municipal Code. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Christine dor�o presented the information contained in the staff report, a 101 of which is on file in the Community Development Department. a. Section 9.50.090 (A)(1 if the site inspection w the inspection was pri Approved as recommE b. Section 9.50.090( changed to "requi C. Section develop be affe G:\WPD0CS\PC7-24-01.wpd 9.,Blol. 030 Tents Witt ed. streets were rec.ommendf nd (C Commisstoiner rrl asked after the fact. Staff oirified that o a building permit being issued. ommisonet' Tyler asked that it be o,nditiona use permit. Cnrpsioner Tyler asked if the ate er+efs, which are narrow, would nior Engineer Steve Speer stated private considered in regard to this section. Staff his be fpr public streets only and a separate :d f+r c�rivate streets. 9.60'.030(C)(1)(c): Commissioner Tyler questioned r trellis' would be addressed. Staff stated they are soldered a permanent structure. Approved as ended. ion 9.60.045: Commissioners questioned what the lem was attaching to a wall. Staff explained the basic )n was structural requirements. Delete "B" and replace "B" 1) with the removal of "except freestanding" laces, and 2) delete 2-4. ion 9.60.070(B)(2): Commissioner Robbins stated he __..� not understand why his pool equipment cannot be placed next to his house or fence. He has a 15-foot sideyard and the pool equipment has to be placed right in the middle of this setback instead of to either side to keep it clear which now blocks the setback. Commissioner Butler stated that when a pool is in the frontyard the property owner is very limited to where he can put the pool 9 635 o 19 Planning Commission Minutes July 24, 2001 equipment. Commissioner Tyler questioned enclosing the equipment in the frontyard. Section a. add "immediately" before enclosed in the second sentence; as recommended. Section c. Add a section, "when there is no wall". I. Section 9.65.030( )(1)(a) b {)4.): add language to prohibit a utility vault in the sidewolks. Sections (b) and (c) should be IMad options of design Consider allowing upper stories to extend out to the property line with no setback. Retain +� acks and loudesign r details into guidelines. :ion 9.65.030(A)(3)(a): as recommended r S. :ion 9.65.040: as recommended, :ion 9.100.150(G): as recommended. Jon 9.150.060 Table 9-11: encourage tandem and -loaded garages. Leave the Table 9-11 for minimum off nt parking as it is currently written. Section 9.150.080(B)(1): leave the length at 19-feet, not 18 feet as recommended. Section 9.150.080(B)(7): as recommended. G:\WPDOCS\PC7-24-01.wpd IIN 636 U20 Planning Commission Minutes July 24, 2001 X. ADJI NT: tfully submitted, Betty J. Sawyer, Executive Secretary City of La Quinta, California 637 G:\WPDOCS\PC7-24-01.wpd u2].