Loading...
PCMIN 05 28 1996 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA May 28, 1996 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:03 P.M. by Chairman Abels who asked Commissioner Gardner to lead the flag salute. II. ROLL CALL A. Chairman Abels requested the roll call: Present: Commissioners Anderson, Barrows, Gardner, Newkirk, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. B. Commissioners Barrows/Gardner moved and seconded a motion to excuse -. Commissioner Butler. Unanimously approved. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, City Attorney Dawn Honeywell, Planning Manager Christine di Iorio, Senior Engineer Steve Speer, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Associate Planner Greg Trousdell, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. III. PUBLIC COMMENT: None IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Specific Plan 89-014 (Amendment #2); a request of Washington Plaza Associates for certification of a Negative Declaration of an environmental impact and approval of an amendment to the specific plan to allow two additional businesses with drive-thru lanes at the One Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff stated they would like to modify two conditions. Condition #8 be changed to read "all trees shall be a minimum 24-inch box size or and 2~ inches in caliper", and Condition #2 be changed to read "the __ Design Review Board/Planning Commission". vc5-28 1 Planning Commission Meeting May 28, 1996 2. There being no questions of staff, Chairman Abels opened the public hearing. Mr. Rick Doolittle, Hall & Foreman Engineers, stated they had no objections to the Conditions as recommended. 3. There being no questions of the applicant and no further public comment, the public hearing was closed. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Anderson to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 96-017 certifying a Negative Declaration of environmental impact. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Anderson, Barrows, Gardner, Newkirk, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Butler. ABSTAIN: None. 4. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Anderson to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 96-018 recommending to the City Council approval of a Negative Declaration of environmental impact and amendment of Specific Plan 89-014 (Amendment # 2) to allow two additional drive-thins for a total of five, subject to Conditions. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Anderson, Barrows, Gardner, Newkirk, Tyler and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Butler. ABSTAIN: None. B. Conditional Use Permit 96-024 and Environmental Assessment 96-313; a request of KSL Recreation Corporation for certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact, approval to expand the existing La Quinta Resort and Club Golf Course Maintenance Facility, and approval of an adjustment to deviate from the development standards of the SR Zone District to allow a six foot masonry wall along Avenida Carranza instead of a four-foot high wall. 1. Commissioners Anderson and Gardner excused themselves due to a possible conflict of interest and withdrew from the Council Chamber. 2. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff asked that Conditions # 19-24 be added to the Conditions of Approval, based on the discussions made by the Commissioners during the study session. 3. Commissioner Barrows asked if the conditions for landscaping on Calle Tampico were to provide landscaping all the way to Eisenhower Drive. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell explained the requirement was clarified in the conditions for the plot plan application. The new landscaping would not go all the way to Eisenhower Drive. PC5-28 2 Planning Commission Meeting May 28, 1996 4. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Abels opened the public hearing. Mr. Scott Dalecio, representing KSL Resort and Club, reviewed the purpose of their application. He questioned Condition g3, regarding the timing for the installation of improvements in association with parking; Condition g8 verification as to a definition of what heavy equipment is; they would like staff to explain Condition gl 5 regarding the acoustical device; Condition gl 7 needs to have the size of the gate clarified; Condition gl 8 clarification needs to be made as to whether the apprOval will be made by the Planning Commission or staff; and Condition g21 is already accomplished by their design. The plan they are proposing provides the immediate residents a more aesthetic view. They do not want to install planter pockets in the wall as the pockets will become a collector for trash and more of a maintenance problem. 5., Commissioner Tyler asked about the hours of operation and if they would be Open every day. Mr. Dalecio stated they would have workers on all seven days. Commissioner Tyler suggested the motorized gate be kept open to allow the traffic to continue to move during the morning hours. Mr. Forrest Haag, landscape architect for the project, clarified the gate was not motorized, but a swinging gate. Commissioner Tyler asked if the piles of loose gravel would be relocated, and if so, where. Mr. Dalecio stated the Conditions of Approval designates the area where loose material is stored and defines how that will be accomplished. Mr. Virgil Robinson, Supervisor for the Maintenance Facility, answered questions regarding the operation of the facility. 6. Mr. Jack Hochanadel, 51-120 Carranza, stated most of his questions had been answered by the applicant. He was however, concerned about the large trucks, such as gravel, cement, etc., that continually travel down the street all day long. In addition, the retaining wall shown on the elevations, is two feet higher than their existing property. He suggested the wall be eight feet in height on the inside of the project and six feet on Avenida Carranza with a 20-foot setback from the Bike Path and landscaped. This would hide their equipment, dump trucks, gravel piles, and create another sound barrier. 7. Ms. Louise Miller, 51-040 Avenida Carranza, directly across the street from the subject wall, stated her concern that the six foot wall would be installed too close to the Bike Path. She stated the Path was eight feet wide and installing, the wall at the edge of the path would cause safety problem. In addition, the large piles of sand and gravel at the north side of the maintenance yard are allowed to blow loose sand over the bike path causing an unsafe condition. The wall needs to extend to the north end of the PC5-28 3 Planning Commission Meeting May 28, 1996 maintenance yard. The gravel piles are a nuisance as neighborhood children are continually having rock-throwing contests. Additionally, the workers arriving in the morning are playing their music as loud as possible when arriving, plus the noise from starting up their equipment awakens them every morning. Could a condition be placed on the project to not allow noise before 6:00 A.M. 8. There being no further public discussion, Chairman Abels closed the public hearing. Commissioner Tyler stated that after seeing the site, he agreed that installing a wall around it would improve the site. He agreed that when the workers arrive they tend to usually play their music as loud as possible. He felt the Commission needed to clarify the size of the setback from the wall to the Bike Path. The Bike Path is eight feet wide of concrete with another 3-4 feet of dirt for a nmning path. This makes 12-feet from the curb. The setback from this point needs to be specifically spelled out. 9. Commissioner Newkirk stated he agreed with Commissioner Tyler. The -proposal will improve the neighborhood. 10. Commissioner Barrows stated she concurred with the statements already made and her concern was with the setback from the Bike Path as this is one of the heaviest traveled areas of the path. If the applicant does not want to put the notches in the wall, would they consider setting the wall back? She also questioned the hours of use to accommodate the neighbors. 11. Chairman Abels stated he too agreed with the statements already made and asked staff to clarify the questions raised by the applicant regarding Conditions//3,//8,//15,//17, and//18. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell briefly discussed why each of these conditions had been recommended. 12. Commissioner Barrows asked what the distance was between the Bike Path and the wall, and what were the problems with the alarm system. Staff stated we were unaware of the alarm system problem until they received the letter from the resident. 13. Chairman Abels stated his concern about the gravel piles and his concem that this be fixed, and why following the approval in 1985 had the conditions never been met. Staff should see that they are met now. 14. Commissioner Newkirk stated he agreed the wall should be straight but setback further from the Bike Path. Commissioner Tyler suggested a curvilinear wall would add dimension and additional space for the landscaping if the wall was straight. Commissioner Barrows suggested a PC5-28 4 Planning Commission Meeting May 28, 1996 minimum of a five foot setback, but would be better at 10 feet. Staff stated the setback would only affect the storage area. Discussion followed regarding the setback distances. 15. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the Public Works Department would provide additional information regarding the distance of the wall to the front property line. 16. Commissioner Tyler asked if the City had any control over the hours of operation of the facility. City Attomey Dawn Honeywell stated the City has' no ordinance regarding the hours of operation, but this was a conditional use permit and the Planning Commission could place any conditions on the project it deemed necessary. 17. Chairman Abels recessed the hearing at 8:56 P.M. to give staff time to f'md the plans regarding the Bike Path. The hearing reconvened at 9:01 P.M. and Senior Engineer Steve Speer presented information stating the dimensions of the Bike Path. The wall would be eight feet from the Bike Path. ~-- 18. Mr. Scott Dalecio, KSL La Quinta Resort and Golf Club, stated they did not know what a parabolic device was as mentioned in Condition #15. They were sensitive to the concerns of the residents and their purpose was to contain all the nuisances within their perimeter wall. In reference to the wall and the setback to the Bike Path, their plans were to set the wall back 8 feet from the Bike Path. Regarding the track traffic traveling over the streets, it would be easier if they could straighten out Calle Tampico to have direct access to the facility. The hours of operation had been addressed by the City Council when they were reviewing a potential noise ordinance for golf courses. Council, at that time, denied the ordinance as there was no consensus of opinion regarding the hours to regulate noise. The later the start time for maintenance workers meant the later the start time for the golfers, and this costs money and creates an inconvenience to the members. However, KSL in an effort to be cohesive with the neighbors, would continue to discipline their employees regarding the noise from their vehicles. 19. Commissioner Barrows asked Mr. Dalecio how he felt about having a curved wall. Mr. Dalecio stated they preferred a straight wall. 20. Commissioner Newkirk stated he felt a clarification should be made as to what a parabolic device was. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated it was a sound deflecting mechanism, parabolic in shape. PC5-28 5 Planning Commission Meeting May 28, 1996 21. Commissioner Tyler stated his concern about requiring a device that appears to be of minimal assistance. 22. Chairman Abels suggested the applicant contact staff to determine what the device was and if it was need. 23. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Newkirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 96-019 approving a Mitigated Declaration of environmental impact according to the findings contained in the resolution. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Barrows, Newkirk, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Anderson, Butler, and Gardner. ABSTAIN: None. 24. it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Newkirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 96-020 approving Conditional Use Permit 96-024 to allow the expansion of an existing golf maintenance facility and to allow a six foot high wall which is higher than permitted by Chapter 9.42 of the Municipal Code, subject to the recommended conditions as amended: Condition #6 would include a wall with an 8-foot setback between the edge .. of the entire Bike Path and the wall, but elimination of the wording referring to the four foot deep and five foot wide insets on the wall along the outdoor equipment storage portion; adding to Condition #15, the applicant would work with staff to resolve concerns regarding noise which may include the installation of an acoustical device. Staff asked for clarification on Condition #5 regarding the landscaping. Commissioner Barrows stated the size requirement for the trees would be required without the insets. Condition #16, add the additional wording, "if landscaping products and surface materials...". Finally, the addition of Conditions #19-24 as recommended by staff. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Barrows, Newkirk, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Anderson, Butler, and Gardner. ABSTAIN: None. C. Tentative Tract 28340; a request of KSL Recreation Corporation for approval of the subdivision of 37.98 acres into 117 single family and ten common amenity lots. 1. Commissioners Anderson and Gardner excused themselves due to a possible conflict of interest and withdrew from the Council Chamber. PC5-28 6 Planning Commission Meeting May 28, 1996 2. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3. There being no questions of staff, Chairman Abels opened the public hearing. Mr. Chevis Hosea, Director of Real Estate for KSL Recreation Corporation, explained the application before the Commission. He requested modification of Conditions #7.a., that they not be required to change the reserve lots to dedicated easements; Condition #50, be amended allow them to pull building permits without complying with the specific plan; and Condition #52, apply only to the applicable phase. 4. Commissioner Tyler asked if Mr. Hosea had a suggestion as to the wording of Condition #50. City Attorney Dawn Honeywell stated the Planning Commission cannot approve a Tentative Tract Map without meeting the Specific plan requirements. The purpose of writing the condition this way was to give the applicant additional time. The Planning Commission does not have the authority to approve building permits that are not consistent with the specific plan.. Mr. Hosea stated he hoped they would not be held up in -- their construction by requiring compliance with the specific plan. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated they had been working with KSL regarding this problem and the proposed changes to the specific plan would be to the Planning Commission by the middle of July and to the City Council by August. Staff plans to continue working with KSL to solve this problem as rapidly as possible. 5. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public hearing. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Newkirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 96-021, recommending to the City Council approval of Tentative Tract 28340, with changes to Condition #52 that the applicant shall submit the recreational amenities for the applicable phase to be provided prior to issuance of a building permit; Condition #7.a., allows a reservation easement in lieu of a street dedication. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Barrows, Newkirk, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Anderson, Butler, and Gardner. ABSTAIN: None. D. Tentative Tract 28341; a request of KSL Recreation Corporation for approval of a -- subdivision of 16.4 acres into 56 single family and four common lots. PC5-28 7 Planning Commission Meeting May 28, 1996 1. Commissioners Anderson and Gardner excused themselves due to a possible conflict of interest and withdrew from the Council Chamber. 2. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3. There being no questions of staff, Chairman Abels opened the public hearing. Commissioner Tyler asked Mr. Hosea what they intended to build regarding the amenities. Mr. Hosea stated they were intending to build only one pool and spa. Discussion followed regarding the number of pools in the area and the issue of maintaining the pools. 4. There being no further discussion, Chairman Abels closed the public hearing. It was moved and seconded to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 96- 022 recommending to City Council approval of Tentative Tract 28341, subject to conditions as amended: Condition #52, only one pool and spa would be required. Staff clarified that the wording on the tract map exhibit referring to a "Vesting" tract was an error and should be deleted. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Barrows, Newkirk, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Anderson, Butler, and Gardner. ABSTAIN: None. Commissioners Anderson and Gardner rejoined the meeting. VI. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Continued - Sign Application 96-341; a request of Mr. Gerald Bogan for approval of a master sign program for the newly constructed Bogan Villas Commercial building. 1. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. There being no questions of staff, Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Gerry Bogan, 54-368 Inverness, stated he was still not in agreement with staff's recommendations. In particular, the size of the sign recommended would not be adequate. He was still concemed that no second story signs would be allowed on Calle Estado. He felt the tenants need to have a sign to identify their business. Each business has its own entrance and therefore needs its own sign. He felt · strongly that signage was needed on the south side for the second floor businesses. Mr. Bogan stated that if he was unable to rent his building because signs would not be allowed on the south side, then he has a problem. PC5,28 8 Planning Commission Meeting May 28, 1996 3. Chairman Abels asked if Mr. Bogan had received the sign program example presented by one of the Commissioners. Mr. Bogan stated he appreciated the efforts that were made, but he would like to own and run his own building. 4. There being no questions of Mr. Bogan, Chairman Abels opened the matter to Commission discussion. 5. Commissioner Anderson stated he felt the same as he did at the prior meeting. He appreciated the importance of identifying the tenants in this building, and he felt the signs could be done. on this building that are in keeping with the Village Specific Plan. He commended Mr. Bogan for developing the building and would like to see the tenants be successful, but he does not believe signs will bring them in. 6.. Commissioner Barrows stated she agreed with Commissioner Anderson and did not want to set any precedent for the Village area. Commissioner Anderson stated he did not want to dictate signs or say that he had a better -- design for the buildings, but only wished to give an example of what could be done. 7. Commissioners Gardner and Newkirk stated they agreed with Commissioner Anderson. 8. Commissioner Tyler stated he understood that the first tenants of the building would be pedestrian traffic and the lower level signs would be visible to the walking public. The upstairs would be more professional tenants and would need building identification and directory sign stating the space identification number. He did agree with staffs recommendation and would agree with directional signage, and a building identification sign. 9. Community Development Director Jerry Herman clarified the developer has the option of having a directional signage; Community Development Director Jerry Herman questioned whether the Commission was requiting the directory sign to be mandatory? Commissioner Tyler stated he did not want it to be mandatory. 10. Chairman Abels stated he agreed with the header signage and directional -- signage. He did not agree that signs are needed on the south side for the upstairs tenants. If the application was denied, would they have to come back with a new plan. Staff clarified they have the option of coming back with a new plan or appealing to the City Council. Staff pointed out that they did not include all of Commissioner Anderson's recommendations in the Conditions of Approval. PC5-28 9 Planning Commission Meeting May 28, 1996 -- 11. Commissioner Barrows stated that Antique business requested additional signage and asked if this was included in staff's recommmendation. Associate Planner Greg Trousdel stated yes and this was Condition #3.d. Planning Manager Christine di Iorio stated the condition would have to be clarified with the wording, "the description of the use instead of just the business identification would be allowed when an tenant has leased two or more spaces". Two signs would be allowed with a total square footage of 20. 12. Chairman Abels stated they did not want to appear as being anti-business, but the Commission had to follow what they felt was right for the City. 13.. Following lengthy discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Tyler to adopt Minute Motion 96-021 approving Sign Application 96-341, as conditioned and with the modification to Condition #3.C to add "The business identification sign shall not exceed 18-inches in height and 10- feet in overall length. A maximum of 12 full size signs or the equivalent of 12 full size signs shall be allowed. For shared lease spaces, full size signs can be divided into two equally sized signs or tenant sign graphics can be shared on one full size sign." Condition #3.D. would be changed to read, "One business identification sign shall be permitted for each tenant space. Tenants with more than one lease space may have one building sign per lease space which may include a description of the use. Accessory under canopy signs along the Calle Estado arcade are also permitted per Subitem 'F'". The ' motion carded on a 5-1 vote with Commissioner Anderson voting no. 14. Mr. Bogan asked for clarification as to whether or not the Commission was dictating how many suites he would be allowed to have in the building. Commissioner Anderson clarified that the Commission was uncomfortable with giving a unlimited number of tenant signs, so they were trying to base the signs on the number of suites, according to the plans. Chairman Abels stated the Commission was not dictating how many suites the applicant could have. B. Street Vacation 96-029; a request of T.D. Desert Development for a determination of consistency with. the General Plan to allow a street vacation. 1. Senior Engineer Steve Speer presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. PC5-28 10 Planning Commission Meeting May 28, 1996 2. Commissioner Tyler asked about the emergency access at the northeast comer as it appeared to go through existing houses. Staff explained they were vacant lots. 3. There being no further questions, it was moved and seconded by Commissioner Tyler/Anderson to adopt Minute Motion 96-022 adopting the findings that Street Vacation 96-029 for the street right-of-way easements, are in compliance with the adopted Circulation Element of the La Quinta General Plan and that the City Council consider for inclusion in the vacation, those conditions outlined within Exhibit "A". Unanimously approved VI. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Chairman Abels asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of May 14, 1996. Commissioner Anderson asked that Page 10, Item #14, the fourth sentence, be changed to read," .... ground floor tenants on the wood header on the south elevation." Commissioner Tyler asked that Page 3, Item 6 be changed to note that Mrs. Tyler spoke on her own behalf and in the second sentence, "that currently in the northern portion of La Quinta there are 46 Code violations of the current City codes of various natures. We have a total of 34 assorted Rvs, utility trailers, pop-up trailers, boats, camping trailers in front yards, driveways, and at our curbs." There being no further corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Tyler to approve the Minutes as amended. Unanimously approved. VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS A. Commissioner Tyler reported on the City Council meeting of May 21, 1996. B. Chairman Abels opened discussion regarding the meeting dates of the Commission for August. Following discussion it was determined that the Planning Commission would go dark on August 27, 1996 and September 10, 1996. C. Department update - no report VIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Anderson to adjourn this meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting on June 11, 1996. This regular meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 9:55 P.M. Unanimously approved. PC5-28 11