The URL can be used to link to this page

2002 02 05 CCCity Council Agendas are available on the City's web page @www.la-quinta.org City Council Agenda CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-495 Calle Tampico - La Quinta, California 92253 Adjourned Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 5, 2002 - 12:00 Noon Beginning Res. No. 2002-05 Ord. No. 364 I. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Council Members: Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena Il. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. III. CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION, CITY OF LA QUINTA V. CITY OF INDIO, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a). 2. CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION, CITY OF LA QUINTA V. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a). 3. CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, MARK WEISS, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 CONCERNING POTENTIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ACQUISITION AND/OR DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF MADISON STREET BETWEEN AVENUE 58 AND AVENUE 60. PROPERTY OWNER/NEGOTIATOR: WINCHESTER DEVELOPMENT; AND REAL PROPERTY LOCATED WEST OF MADISON STREET BETWEEN AVENUE 60 AND AVENUE 62. PROPERTY OWNER/NEGOTIATOR: DAVIS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT; AND REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF JEFFERSON STREET, SOUTH OF AVENUE 52. PROPERTY OWNER/NEGOTIATOR: KSL Too City Council Agenda Page 1 February 5, 2002 NOTE: Time permitting, the City Council may conduct Closed Session discussions during the dinner recess. Additionally, if the City is considering acquisition of real property, persons identified as negotiating parties do not attend the closed session. RECONVENE AT 3:00 P.M. IV. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE V. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or matters that are not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. Please watch the timing device on the podium. For all Business Session matters or Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak to come forward at the appropriate time. VI. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA VII. PRESENTATIONS 1 . WASTE MANAGEMENT OF THE DESERT REGARDING THEIR PLANS FOR A TRANSFER STATION. VIII. WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE 1. WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE FROM LA PRENSA HISPANA. IX. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF JANUARY 15, 2002. X. CONSENT CALENDAR Note: Consent Calendar items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved by one motion unless requested for separate consideration by a member of the City Council or the public. 1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED FEBRUARY 5, 2002. 2. APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP 29909, SANTA ROSA PLAZA, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. 3. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION FROM WAL-MART TO THE LA QUINTA SENIOR CENTER. 4. APPROVAL OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE (PS&E) AND AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR BID, PROJECT NO. 99-04A, AVENUE 52 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS. '�J -_6 City Council Agenda Page 2 February 5, 2002 XI XIII. 5. APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (PSA) WITH WILLDAN TO PREPARE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE (PS&EJ) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2001 /2002 TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, PROJECT NO. 2001-10. 6. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 42, THE TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT ACT. BUSINESS SESSION 1. CONSIDERATION OF A SPONSORSHIP REQUEST FROM THE COACHELLA VALLEY ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE OUTLOOK 2002. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 2. CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT REQUESTS. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 3. CONSIDERATION OF PARTICIPATION IN THE DESERT SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARDS PROGRAM. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 4. CONSIDERATION OF REDEVELOPMENT/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANT SERVICES. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION. 5. CONSIDERATION OF MID -YEAR BUDGET REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 /02. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSSION OF DESIGN CONCEPTS FOR THE CITY'S THIRD FIRE STATION. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS 2. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WORKSHOP/INFORMATION COMMITTEE (PENA) 3. C.V. MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (PERKINS) 4. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (SNIFF) 5. DESERT RESORTS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 6. DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AD HOC COMMITTEE (HENDERSON/ADOLPH) 7. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES COMMITTEE (HENDERSON) 8. MUSEUM EXPANSION COMMITTEE (ADOLPH/SNIFF) 9. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 10. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION City Council Agenda Page 3 February 5, 2002 � `� XIV. XV. KAW 1 1. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FREE LIBRARY SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE 12. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DESERT LIBRARY ZONE ADVISORY BOARD (HENDERSON) 13. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (PENA) 14. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY/SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP (PENA) 15. CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 20, 2001 16. COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 10, 2001 DEPARTMENT REPORTS 1. CITY MANAGER A. RESPONSE(S) TO PUBLIC COMMENTS B. STATUS OF ELECTED REPRESENTATION ON THE COACHELLA VALLEY ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP'S EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE C. MID -YEAR REPORT ON CITY OF LA QUINTA MARKETING PROGRAM D. REPORT ON FEDERAL "MEMBERS' REQUEST" FUNDING 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK A. REPORT ON UPCOMING EVENTS B. CITY PINS 4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIRECTOR 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR 7. FINANCE DIRECTOR 8. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER 9. POLICE CHIEF 10. FIRE CHIEF MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS 1 . LA QUINTA CIVIC MUSIC CONCERTS - COUNCIL MEMBER ADOLPH. RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak form and limit your comments to three (3) minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. PRESENTATIONS 1. ART WALL PRESENTATIONS, TRUMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. a.� City Council Agenda Page 4 February 5, 2002 XVI11. PUBLIC HEARINGS For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak, to come forward at the appropriate time. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING TO CERTIFY A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-436, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-083 AND ZONE CHANGE 2001-105 FROM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND TOURIST COMMERCIAL; AND SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 TO REVIEW DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR TOURIST COMMERCIAL USES INCLUDING HOTELS, AND RETAIL -RELATED USES, AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING TOWNHOUSES AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. APPLICANT LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) B. READ ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING C. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE ON FIRST READING 2. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING TO CERTIFY A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-433, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-082 TO CHANGE CERTAIN STANDARDS RELATING TO INTERSECTION SPACING IN THE GENERAL PLAN; SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 ESTABLISHING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 120,700 SQUARE FOOT NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE STATION AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE; AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 FOR THE SUPERMARKET, BANK, AND DRUGSTORE BUILDINGS TO BE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AVENUE 52 AND JEFFERSON STREET. APPLICANT RLF DEVELOPMENT. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) B. READ ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING C. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE ON FIRST READING 3. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S INTENT TO VACATE PORTIONS OF AVENIDA BERMUDAS, NORTH OF CALLE TAMPICO; CALLE AMIGO NEAR AVENUE 52; AVENUE 48 WEST OF WASHINGTON STREET, AND A 12 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT BETWEEN LOTS 16 AND 17 OF TRACT 2667. A. RESOLUTION ACTION 4. PUBLIC HEARING TO CERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-415 AND APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29963 AND STREET NAME CHANGE 2001-013; A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 9.1 ACRES INTO FOUR SINGLE FAMILY LOTS LOCATED AT THE NORTHERN TERMINUS OF KIRK COURT, APPROXIMATELY 659 FEET NORTH OF AVENUE 58, AND RENAME KIRK COURT TO CORAL MOUNTAIN COURT. APPLICANT: DR. AND MRS. BRUCE BAUMANN. A. RESOLUTION ACTION City Council Agenda Page 5 February 5, 2002 5. PUBLIC HEARING TO CERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-417 AND APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30092, AMENDMENT #1, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 38.4 ACRES INTO 130 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MONROE STREET. APPLICANT: BARTON PROPERTIES, INC. A. RESOLUTION ACTION 6. PUBLIC HEARING TO CERTIFY A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-437, REVIEW OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-081 AND ZONE CHANGE 2001-104 TO CHANGE 14 ACRES AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND AVENUE 52 FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL; SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-016 AMENDMENT #1 MODIFYING STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 490 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES, 50 RESORT RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 18 HOLE GOLF COURSE, AND 14-ACRE NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER; TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 TO SUBDIVIDE PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA INTO 178 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, LOTS FOR FUTURE RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION, CASITAS DEVELOPMENT GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE AND CLUBHOUSE FACILITY LOTS, AND OTHER LETTERED LOTS FOR STREETS AND OTHER FACILITIES FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF JEFFERSON STREET BETWEEN AVENUE 50 AND AVENUE 52. APPLICANT TOLL BROTHERS, INC. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) B. READ ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING C. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE ON FIRST READING 7. PUBLIC HEARING ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-431, ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 232 (SCH #9164450613), GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-080, ZONE CHANGE 2001-103, FOR PROPERTY BOUNDED BY AVENUE 58 ON THE NORTH, AVENUE 50 ON THE SOUTH, MADISON STREET ON THE WEST, AND MONROE STREET ON THE EAST, AND THE EAST SIDE OF MONROE STREET, GENERALLY SOUTH OF AVENUE 59 (EXTENDED) TO AVENUE 61, GENERALLY A DISTANCE OF ONE HALF MILE AT AVENUE 59 (EXTENDED) AND A DISTANCE OF ONE QUARTER MILE AT AVENUE 61. APPLICANTS: T.D. DEVELOPMENT AND CITY OF LA QUINTA. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) B. READ ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING C. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE ON FIRST READING RECESS RECONVENE JOINTLY AS THE CITY COUNCIL AND LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY S. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO APPROVE AN AGREEMENT TO SELL REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 52-645 AVENIDA DIAZ BY AND BETWEEN KATHERINE CARROLL AND THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION UU City Council Agenda Page 6 February 5, 2002 9. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO APPROVE AN AGREEMENT TO SELL REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 53-540 AVENIDA CARRANZA BY AND BETWEEN TYRA PAINTER AND THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION XIX. ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to the regularly scheduled City Council Meeting, commencing with closed session at 2:00 P.M. and open session at 3:00 p.m., Tuesday, February 19, 2002, in the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. 00 City Council Agenda Page 7 February 5, 2002 DECLARATION OF POSTING I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting of February 5, 2002, was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico and on the bulletin board at the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce and at Stater Bros. 78-630 Highway 111, on Friday, February 1, 2002. DATED: February 1, 2002 JUN EEK, CMC City Clerk, City of La Quinta, California PUBLIC NOTICES The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at 777-7025, 24-hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 777-7025. A one (1) week notice is required. If background material is to be presented to the City Council, during a City Council Meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the 3:00 p.m session or the 7:00 p.m session for distribution. City Council Agenda Page 8 February 5, 2002 d cT SETH ETINGER 78720 AVENIDA LA FONDA LA QUINTA, CA. 92253 (760) 564 4809 (760) 564 6320 FAX NOVEMBER 25,2001 DEARNEIGHBOR; MY MORTGAGE LENDER REQUIRES THAT I CARRY FLOOD INSURANCE! FOR I I YEARS FARMER'S INSURANCE COMPANY HAS BEEN OVER CHARGING ME ALMOST "THREE TIMES THE PROPER RATE INSPITE OF THE FACT THAT ON 3 OR 4 OCCASIONS I TOLD THEM THAT THERE HAD TO BE SOMETHING WRONG. I INTEND TO RECOVER THAT MONEY PLUS INTEREST. I ALSO INTEND TO PUT A STOP TTTHAT PRACTICE BY ANY OF THE INSURANCE COMPANIES. IF YOUR FLOOD INSURANCE PREMIUM IS LARGER THAN YOUR HOME OWNERS PRENHUM, THAT, IS A SIGN THAT YOU ARE BEING OVERCHARGED IF YOU ARE BEING OVER CHARGED PLEASE CONTACT NIE WITH THE PARTICULARS. USE FAX, OR MAIL ME THE INFORMATION. YOURNEIGHBOl?., SETH ETINGER PRESENTATION December I I , 2001 Mr. Jerry Herman Community Development Director City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mr. Herman: WASTE MANAGEMENT 41-575 Eclectic Street Palm Desert, CA 92260 (760) 340-5901 (760) 340-2732 Fax www.wmdesert.com (f,1` ,'Yo a P co > o M As you are aware, the Riverside County Edom Hill Landfill is scheduled to close in 2004. This will leave the Coachella Valley with very few options since it is the main landfill where solid waste is dispose of for most cities in the Coachella Valley. With this, Waste Management of the Desert has taken a leadership position of working on a long-term solution for the Coachella Valley. We are in the process of submitting a permit to construct and operate a Transfer Station located near the Edom Hill Landfill. Our interest is to ensure rate stability for our customers and minimize the impact from a landfill to a transfer. station. In keeping our lines of communicate open, we would like to do a presentation to your City Council in January regarding our plans for a transfer station. This will give you and your council the opportunity to view our plans and ask questions. Frank and I are available to meet with you at a suitable time to discuss these benefits of the transfer station to your City. In the meantime, please feel free to contact me at (760) 340- 5901 if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, L DLh McGarrey Municipal Marketing Manager cc: Mr. Tom Genovese, City Manager Mr. Frank Orlett, District Manager o 'L- 10:�39A.rvl;WASTE MGMT DESRT =.D1,1 o - ' g--4L;k- )0 - TE MON4G ENT 41-575 Eclectic Strut Palm Desert, CA 92260 (760) 340.5901 (760) 340-2732 Fax www.wmdesert.com February 5, 2002 Mr. Jerry Herman community Service Director City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quirrta, CA 92253 Dear Mr. Herman: On Friday, February 1, 2002. Waste Management of the Desert was selected as one of the two finalists in the RFP process with the County of Riverside regarding the Edom 1E11 replacement facility. This item will go before the Board of Supervisor Tuesday, February 5 at 1:30 p.m., the same time as the City Council Meeting in La Qwnta. Mr. Orlett is out of the country- therefore. I must attend the Board of Supervisor meeting in Riverside. As we discussed on Monday, Waste Management of the Desert will need to reschedule the presentation to the La Quinta City Council regarding the transfer station. Thank you for your consideration, and if you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me at (760) 340-5901. Respectfully, f fy f Deborah McGarrey Municipal Marketing cc: Frank Orlett, District Manager 0 02-05-02 10:50 RECEIVED FROM:7603402732 P•02 JAN-18-2002 11:45 AM ANA WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE ITEM: Mayor John Pena City of La Quetta, Ca. PSPXsA. NA RECEIVED ENS 12: 29 CIT Y 0 '- E. C1UI 'dTA r 1C'I S OFFICE 3anuary 17,2002 ]ear Mayor; La Prensa Hispana Newspaper, founders of the International HiRmic Awards are proud to announce its 60' Annual event. presenting Sponwrst the Apa Caliente Bend of Cahuilla Indian and Time Wanner ��' Cable, will present the event at the Indian Wells Country Club, Friday F braa y 229 starting at 6.50 P.M. with a no host bar. This will be a formal event. Members from the surrounding communities will be honored for their contributions to This eat'S horee3 Will inClude: society in education, music, law, charity, and leadership. from Riverside, Stella Mendoza Lalo GuenreM from Cathedral City, Trim Rivera from imperial, Josephine Gallegos from Indio, Steve Qaintanilla irom Cathedral City, Elizabeth Fausto from Palm Springs, lion And Elia Gentry ffam Indio, Dr. t)avid Kaminsky from Palm Springs, and Quinton Egston from Laear and the will also be three other' recognitions for the Organization f the Business Perm of the yew along with a Student Success Award. The Student Success Award will be bestowed on a student who despite hardships and hard - knocks has managed to graduate. You can help this event by attending at $65 per person or purchasing a table of ten (5650) for the city employees to attend this lively and entertaWng event. We always feature unique musical entertainment that is characteristic of the Hispanic cultwe but not readily available in this area. This year we will feature a nine member Rondallaybrought from Mexico. Please support this event so that individuals who have made contribution part of their lives can be recognized as our way of saying "Thank You", Your contributions will also contribute towards assistance to needy students. This event receives generous media coverage and is generally attended by leaders from all the communitics. The Gold Sponsors this year are: Senator Jim Battin, Eisenh4Wer Medical Center, JFK Memorial Hospital, Valley Independent Bank, Guaranty Bank, Union Bank, KMIR T.V. and Fairway Signs, a4Za jR&*scn r your surt. "4A^k'-O Event Chairwoman 83-1� 5 Requa Suite 1 Indio CA Tel.: (760) 342-256,5 Fax: (760) 342-1036 JAN-10-2002 11:46 AM ANA 3421036 P.02 INV Ira Prensa Hispana Newspaper, founders of The International ``Sol Azteca" Hispanic Awards Request The Pleasure Of Your Company For The 6th Anneal "Sol Azteca" International Hispanic Awards ,At the Indian Welb Country Club 46-000 Club Drive Indian Wells, California 92210 Friday February 22, 2002 No Host Bar 6:00 PM. Dinner & Entertainment at 7:30 PM Awards Ceremony 9:00 PM 65 Per Person $650 — Table of Ten Black Tie or Military uniform No Host Bar Ticket Information 760-342,2565 -� Y COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Demand Register Dated February 5, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Approve Demand Register Dated February 5, 2002 BACKGROUND: Prepaid Warrants: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION CONSENT CALENDAR STUDY SESSION PUBLIC HEARING 48033 - 480461 74,681.39 48047 - 480591 24,993.04 48060 - 480661 165282.54 Wire Transfers } 3849929.82 P/R 8179 - 82461 1035526.83 P/R Tax Transfers} 265777.68 CITY DEMANDS $151275428.10 Payable Warrants: 48067 - 481981 559,437.70 RDA DEMANDS 635200.90 $1,1905629.00 $1,190,629.00 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Demand of Cash - City $151275428.10 . Falconer, FinaAce Director O1 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK TRANSACTIONS 1/10/02 - 1/29/02 1 /11 /02 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $21,372.00 1/17/02 WIRE TRANSFER -RDA ESCROW $25,000.00 1/17/02 WIRE TRANSFER -RDA ESCROW $63,803.00 1/18/02 WIRE TRANSFER -DEFERRED COMP $5,330.80 1/18/02 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS $9,522.02 1/18/02 WIRE TRANSFER - CREDIT UNION $4,922.00 1/14/02 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $65,000.00 1/29/02 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $65,000.00 1/29/02 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $60,000.00 1/29/02 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $64,980.00 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT $384,929.82 V�U 002 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 4:06PM 01/29/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 48067 01/29/02 &01611 ANDREA BACA 50.00 48068 01/29/02 &01612 WENDY BURGIE 55.00 48069 01/29/02 &01613 LORRAINE HUFF 48.00 48070 01/29/02 &01614 MARTHA ARENDS 25.00 48071 01/29/02 &01615 SANDRA BOYER 40.00 48072 01/29/02 &01616 MARY ANN HACKNEY 35.00 48073 01/29/02 &01617 WILLIAM HARRELL 55.00 48074 01/29/02 &01618 BETTY KUTTLER 69.00 48075 01/29/02 &01619 ROSEMARY LORD 55.00 48076 01/29/02 &01620 RICHARD MORGAN 138.00 48077 01/29/02 &01621 KRISTINE NOBLE 10.00 48078 01/29/02 &01622 SHERRY TREVOR 60.00 48079 01/29/02 &01623 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION 24.00 48080 01/29/02 A44050 A440 PIANO SERVICE 85.00 48081 01/29/02 ABL001 ABLE RIBBON TECH 280.22 48082 01/29/02 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 1493.02 48083 01/29/02 ADT100 ADT SECURITY SVC INC 141.45 48084 01/29/02 AME175 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES 168.00 48085 01/29/02 AND007 GARY ANDERSEN 180.00 48086 01/29/02 APH100 APHA PUBLICATIONS SALES 42.95 48087 01/29/02 ARC100 ARCH 356.26 48088 01/29/02 AT0010 A TO Z PARTY RENTALS 385.74 48089 01/29/02 ATT040 AT&T WIRELESS DATA SVC 4.90 48090 01/29/02 AUT030 AUTOMATED TELECOM 616.34 48091 01/29/02 AVA100 AVAYA INC 1263.82 48092 01/29/02 BAK010 FRED BAKER 184.86 48093 01/29/02 BAN020 BANG & BASH 483.75 48094 01/29/02 BER150 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC 13200.00 48095 01/29/02 BES130 BEST LUBE N TUNE 390.72 48096 01/29/02 BRI100 BRINKS INC 306.00 48097 01/29/02 CAD010 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 496.12 48098 01/29/02 CAL035 CAL PRESERVATION FOUNDATN 100.00 48099 01/29/02 CAR300 CARQUEST 484.54 48100 01/29/02 CDW050 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 789.71 48101 01/29/02 COA030 COACHELLA VALLEY INSURANC 814.00 48102 01/29/02 COA067 COACHELLA VLLY PONTIAC 363.18 48103 01/29/02 COL030 COLLEGE OF THE DESERT 90.00 48104 01/29/02 CON115 CONTRERAS CONST 172739.47 48105 01/29/02 COR150 CORPORATE EXPRESS 540.92 48106 01/29/02 COS050 COSTCO BUSINESS DELIVERY 1942.02 48107 01/29/02 CR0005 CROSSROADS SOFTWARE 30575.05 48108 01/29/02 DAN200 DANONE WATERS OF NORTH 252.07 48109 01/29/02 DES018 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1753.76 48110 01/29/02 DESO40 DESERT JANITOR SERVICE 4378.50 48111 01/29/02 DES060 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO 120.25 48112 01/29/02 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC 12674.27 48113 01/29/02 DIE050 DIETERICH POST 208.73 01 003 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 4:06PM 01/29/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 2 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT 48114 01/29/02 DRE050 DREAM ENGINEERING INC 27.95 48115 01/29/02 ELM100 ELMS EQUIPMENT RENTAL INC 3420.00 48116 01/29/02 EQUO10 DALE EQUITZ 80.00 48117 01/29/02 ESR100 E.S.R.I INC 800.00 48118 01/29/02 EVA050 DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC 3080.00 48119 01/29/02 EXP200 EXPRESS DETAIL 1725.00 48120 01/29/02 FED010 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 396.62 48121 01/29/02 FIR017 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES 398.30 48122 01/29/02 FRA010 MARNI FRANCISCO 82.00 48123 01/29/02 GAR040 GARZA TURF & POWER EQUIP 59.62 48124 01/29/02 GAS010 GASCARD INC 68.44 48125 01/29/02 GAT015 GATEWAY BUSINESS 4842.60 48126 01/29/02 GAT020 GATEWAY COMPANIES INC 1133.46 48127 01/29/02 GRA007 W W GRAINGER INC 159.96 48128 01/29/02 HAR010 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 8505.00 48129 01/29/02 HAR100 JOHN HARDCASTLE 25.60 48130 01/29/02 HOA010 HUGH HOARD INC 1432.38 48131 01/29/02 HOM030 HOME DEPOT 3277.48 48132 01/29/02 JAS100 JAS PACIFIC 12820.64 48133 01/29/02 JIM100 JESSE JIMENEZ 97.35 48134 01/29/02 JPRO10 JP REPROGRAPHICS 214.09 48135 01/29/02 JUD010 JUDICIAL DATA SYSTEMS COR 222.00 48136 01/29/02 KEI010 KEITH COMPANIES 1500.00 48137 01/29/02 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 19348.77 48138 01/29/02 KRI100 BRUCE KRIBBS CONSTRUCTION 8892.00 48139 01/29/02 KUS050 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 310.26 48140 01/29/02 LAQ010 LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION 60000.00 48141 01/29/02 LAS050 LASER TEC 75.00 48142 01/29/02 LEA020 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES 7818.00 48143 01/29/02 LIG010 LIGHT SOURCE 1170.59 48144 01/29/02 LIN050 JAMES LINDSEY 57.20 48145 01/29/02 L00010 LOCK SHOP INC 84.64 48146 01/29/02 LOW100 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC 234.68 48147 01/29/02 MAR020 DIANE MARTIN 344.52 48148 01/29/02 MCDO10 MC DOWELL AWARDS 7.60 48149 01/29/02 MIL030 MILLENNIUM BILTMORE HOTEL 624.80 48150 01/29/02 MIR008 FELIPE MIRANDA 330.00 48151 01/29/02 MOM100 MOM'S GAS STATION 600.73 48152 01/29/02 MUN010 MUNI FINANCIAL SERV INC 8713.69 48153 01/29/02 NAW010 RON NAWROCKI 500.00 48154 01/29/02 NEX010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 2287.78 48155 01/29/02 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 20568.50 48156 01/29/02 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 1172.82 48157 01/29/02 OFF007 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 174.65 48158 01/29/02 OLI100 OLINN MESSAGE CENTER 100.45 48159 01/29/02 OWE020 OWEN & BRADLEY 480.07 48160 01/29/02 PET005 CASH/PETTY CASH 147.52 48161 01/29/02 PET100 PET PICKUPS 527.89 48162 01/29/02 PRI020 THE PRINTING PLACE 1765.16 010 004 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 4:06PM 01/29/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 3 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME PAYMENT AMOUNT 48163 01/29/02 PR0005 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND 2743.00 48164 01/29/02 RAL050 RALPHS GROCERY CO 149.98 48165 01/29/02 RBF100 RBF CONSULTING 980.26 48166 01/29/02 RIV020 RIV CNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLR 590.00 48167 01/29/02 RIV089 RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER 1.00 48168 01/29/02 RIV101 RIV COUNTY SHERIFF/INDIO 3711.63 48169 01/29/02 RIV325 RIVERSIDE RUBBER STAMP 42.09 48170 01/29/02 ROC100 ROCKHURST COLLEGE CONT ED 199.00 48171 01/29/02 ROS010 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP 52522.40 48172 01/29/02 ROT100 ROTO ROOTER 10678.50 48173 01/29/02 SHI010 SHIMCO CABINETS 3500.00 48174 01/29/02 SIM040 SIMPLER LIFE EMERGENCY 76.21 48175 01/29/02 SKY200 SKYTEL 16.50 48176 01/29/02 SMA010 SMART & FINAL 578.61 48177 01/29/02 SOCO10 THE SOCO GROUP INC 124.54 48178 01/29/02 SOU007 SOUTHWEST NETWORKS, INC 17868.53 48179 01/29/02 SOU204 SO CALIF CITY CLERKS ASSC 30.00 48180 01/29/02 STE003 M W STEELE GROUP INC 10580.12 48181 01/29/02 TKDO10 T.K.D. ASSOCIATES INC 8469.78 48182 01/29/02 TOP010 TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 1335.79 48183 01/29/02 TRI100 TRI STATE LAND SURVEYORS 1625.00 48184 01/29/02 TRU010 TRULY NOLEN INC 162.00 48185 01/29/02 TTI100 TTI NATIONAL INC 7.87 48186 01/29/02 USB050 U.S.BANK TRUST NATL ASSOC 1733.45 48187 01/29/02 USH100 USHERWOOD & ASSOC OF CAL 47.43 48188 01/29/02 VAL005 VALLEY ANIMAL CLINIC 40.00 48189 01/29/02 VAN075 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOC INC 900.00 48190 01/29/02 VID050 VIDEO DEPOT 11.21 48191 01/29/02 VON010 VON'S C/O SAFEWAY INC 28.11 48192 01/29/02 WAL010 WAL MART COMMUNITY 93.43 48193 01/29/02 WAR060 WARNER ENGINEERING 2460.00 48194 01/29/02 WES020 WEST GROUP 621.89 48195 01/29/02 WOR100 WORLDCOM 1405.00 48196 01/29/02 XER010 XEROX CORPORATION 4052.94 48197 01/29/02 XER012 XEROX CORPORATION 291.00 48198 01/29/02 YOU100 YOUNG ENGINEERING SERVICE 2485.00 CHECK TOTAL 559,437.70 0113 005 z .-+ N N M C' LO I'0 r m r-+ cZ O H z N O 01 N \ •1 x —4 U m m m m m m m m m m m rn o w r4 N N N N N N N N N () 1-4 ri -1 -1 -1 ri rA r-1 ri a s H E" F E+ H H H H H H H H ri r-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 M H O O O O O O O O O O O O z H W z O In m Ln 0 N Q1 m O O In L Q N C (M to 110 tf) M >+ O ri a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 O o 0 0 0 0 w o Lr oo Ln o In In rn L w a o o; In In N V CY) Ul w Ur) M 1-4 w x a 0 a W � a o U cn a a a a a a a a a a a co < < < Q w FC < w w z H H m E-1 cn H cn H v) H cn H 0 &q cn FA Q H E-+ cn O a O U) O cn O U) O c) O (n O to O Ll o cn O 0 O r> O cn W I-+ O E. H E-H a H H H < H H H rz H a U H a a a a a a a rx a x a H a co a U a U a U Z u z U Ix U a CA a U a CQ a 0 a U O H \ O \ O \ O O O O O O O O O O C) O 0 z U z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z H Cl) =) W �:) W M w =) w a w :D w D w a w a w Z) w n W M W Gu > Lu > w > C-. > Ga > 44 > Ga > Lu > Ga > w > Lu >co [s. a a a a a x rz x a a a x w w U W H o a O w > I W M 41 l0 N H rn r1 r1 m N z z2: M w m O M .--1 a) O O m N H H O m O O N O r-I ri N Ol ri N H z H x < z a co W In a 1 0 O w H a r o 0 o O O o 0 0 0 0 0 w In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln o cC O CDO O O O C) CD C:) M Cl a r r r m m m r m ao m rn r z M (Y) (Y) M C) M M M M Cl) M M H C' C' QT C' C' V' V' C' C' z o 0 O o o O o 0 0 o O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 O U 0 o O 0 O O O o 0 o O o U r 4 IcC o O 0 0 o O O O o 0 0 O r-1 -1 r-1 ri 1-1 r-1 r-1 .-i r-1 ri .--1 1-1 M 0 0 U a a w o y, w z a a w z w w H z a w u a x a z O 0 a m o o W F H a x z a o x w H a z a H CQ s Q �a o z x a Q z a o a Li o z z W o: 0 h rz Q z Q oG a H H H W cn O x U H U H a a W U) 2 H Ga W KC 3 a E cn 3 ao rz a x m z O > .7 O >+ H r-I N ri M r-1 'cT r-1 U') r-1 to ri r 1-4 m r-1 m r-1 ko O N �o ri N �o N (N to C-) H U H ri CDO r-1 ri O ri O r-1 O e--1 O r-1 C) .-� C) r-1 C)O 1-1 1-4 C)0 1-4 ,t ,., ` . rJ; U w w w w w w w w zs w w w �ii ,w 006 z r rn N C an �o 0 ri N M qr 1n to rr OD m 0 r4 N M c an �o r m am < M r-1 r1 '-1 r1 r-1 r-1 r1 r-i r1 r-i N N N (N N N N N N N a O F z N O \ 01 N \ N � .1 U 0) GO ON OD 00 co OD co 00 00 co OD 00 00 m OD OD 00 OD OD m OD OD OD OD OD O W H N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N < ri r1 r-1 ri r-1 r--1 rH r-1 r-i r1 r-1 r-1 -1 r-1 r1 r-1 -4 rH ri "1 r1 r-1 r1 -4 r-1 r1 E aC on H H F F H F F H F4 H H F F H H F H H H F H H H H H E- a a -4 r1 0 o N r OD r-i M 0 OD r-i o r an r C m o r r r 00 00 0 �r r-1 0 M F O O N Ol N (Y) t.0 r N O m 01 N m O r 1n m O r OO OD r M OO O Z H W z v an 0 M an an CV to r M to to N Cu o M C 1� M r r OD N O N OD co O t.0 N N N r-i C 1-1 N M r N N r-i -1 r-1 C (") C "i l0 OD >+ O N r-1 N r-1 Q a O O O N O O O N O H C 1; O t.0 H N 00 00 � N a a w U z U a a a a H H z H H 0 0 0 z O o w a U H w z H a rz a a o fx cn a cn cn cn cn cn cn cn v) cn cn cn cn cn cn U) cn cn u) cn cn O H O O F O W O w W w W W W w W w W W W W w w w w w W W W W W .7 (Y. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ " ❑ H H H H H H H H H H H H . . H H H . . H . . H z U z z z O z a z a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a H 1n w ❑ w Z w w W w w w w w a w w w w w w w u4 w w w w w a1 a, w a, w > t=d > < > a, > a4 a w u4 a w as aw as w w w a4 u4 a4 w w w a4 CL w n. w ❑ w H o ❑❑❑ a❑ o❑ a a❑ D O❑ a❑❑ D D❑❑ a❑ a cn a a U) cn U) U) U) cn U) U) U) Cl) U) CO U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) cn w C14 U W t.0 H ❑ a an 0 w ri OD C I > Cq 1 O r r-1 C an M M rn -i N m m M r l0 ,0 1n an an -A r-1 -i ir" 1 m W z z x N w O co O N l0 l0 110 C m O O O r 1-1 1-1 m M M r r r m 0 r H ❑ H a r-I O r m m r r r r O O OD OD m r r r m m m O M M O O l0 H z r-i (Y) r-1 r-1 V4 r-1 r l r1 N N r-i r-f r-1 r 4 V-1 r♦ r-1 r-i r-1 N .-1 r-1 N N r-1 ❑ O OD r r OD r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r H x a z a < co W m z 1 0 o w F a CD r1 0 0 0 0 M r m r r M r m r r M r m M r r rn rr r r W O ri O O O O (`) C C C C M C C C C M C C M C C C C C C £ O lD O O O O OD OD lD 00 OD OD OD to OD OD OD 00 l0 OD 00 OD l0 00 OD co O r1 r-i M M M M M Ol M M M M 0) f+" 1 M M M m f'" 1 M (r) m m M M z N N O O O O O O ri O O O O rH 0 0 O O r-1 O O O r-i O O O H r r r z O N r i r r r M C ri M m M C r-1 (Y) M 1`M 1M r-1 M C C ri C M M O O O ao In 1n 1n al 1n O 1n 1n to to O 1n 1n an an O to to u) O to 1n to O O N M M M M C C to C C C C an C C C C an C C C 1n C C C U r1 Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r-I r1 r1 r1 r1 r-1 —1 r 4 to r-1 r-1 —1 r A an r-1 r-1 r-1 r-i ao r-1 ri r-I ao r-i r-1 r-i z O H M H W 0 U U O :D H x u-) z > U w H oG W r> U) W F 2 to W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 1 o z x a x x cx x os a x x a a x x a a x x a x x a a U o o a a W E" z W 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 a z a m ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ H Q o z w >4 a o O w x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x a O E-1 c a W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W a z z Q cn F [ri w Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q z O > M O r1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ."i N an O r-1 r-1 r-1 r1 r1 ri r-i r-1 r-i r-1 r-1 r1 r-i r l r1 r1 r1 r-1 "1 -1 r q r-1 r--1 O >+ w O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O F 1-1 c a W W w W W W W W W W W G] W W w W W W W W W W W U H O v W U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 007 z Q Qx O o M .--4 M N M M M yr M Ln m r m rn o r1 LA (n r M -+ r 1 M r1 m M c ri am M 0 C' N O H z Ol N \ M x r-1 O W U H < m N r♦ m N ri m N ri m N ri m N -1 m N r-1 MOO rA r-1 r 4 ri ODM -1 ri r-1 1-4 m N •-d m N ri m r-I OD r-I m r-1 m r1 r-i m N r-1 m N r1 E rC a a ra CO H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H M E- .-1 110 1` O O O M M 0) 0� O O M N O O O O LO Ol lD O Ol r-1 CF) r-1 z W H z ::) OD l0 1� M 00 d' 0\ O1 [- 1- d' m d' m O m N V' l0 LO N m C Q; l0 N C' 0) }L a O r-1 M m N r-1 N O Ln c O O O O LO m 1.0 N C 1` O 0) M m 11 'T m 110 O O m U z N T LA LO Ln m 4 r1 Q a M M co cn > w w CtL S 3 W C) a a 0 0 a \ a a L� z a a a Q a w z z O H O H H H O O 0 O 0 H 0 M z H 0 0 x H O H O H O H E4 O a a O x W UP H H z H z H H a m s m H H H >+ H U H H C] H " a 1--1 0 a H 0" a w WWWWWWO m m m m m a r.>r m a O U 0 a O >1 H (L O U z a O > coo a (n w x O Cl) C7 a O a W s W cn U) > z Z U H a H a H a H a H a H a M z x 0 z z " z H 0 z z w O z w U O z z O z H a O z 43 a 0 z w w W a H cn w aL a a, a a a as a a4 a a a> w C4 Q x w > x O x O> w a O> w x w> W w 0> w a a> W w a> w z O z O W a Ef)W 0 0 w a m 0 m 0 m m m O m a Q s Q O m O m 0x C4 x w < C4 a U)3 H x a x C4 H S w H (] O (i. W IT O W O Ln (N 01 Q Q m N m > 1 z > z m x m 1` m m m m m m 0) N a> N m c m -V lD v CT M O M m C ri to N N O O (M r1 r1 H Ll H H O z t.D r-1 1- r-1 [- r1 1- r1 m r� m ri N M N (`M 1` O m O m N c'M M 1 ri M Ln Ln r-1 N ri O N H x 1- 1- 1` 1` Ln Ln r 1 r1 m r I O N Co O FC z a rt m w m a 1 O 0 44 H t4 G] m r IT m Ln N m r d m L- C m r V' m r C m O cT lD O �T lD Lo m LO LD m LO a v LO O O O O lD lD O O O O O O -+ ri lD O l0 lD O l0 lD O z H m O [� m O 1- rr) O 1- M O [- M O t- M O f- 0) O lD 0) O LA Ol O l0 0l O lD Ln O l0 M lD Ln c'') l0 Ln 1-1 lD Ol O L0 ri N lD Ln M lD LO M l0 z O O C Ln C c Ln Q v LO Q M Ln Q M Ln C Ln C m LO C qw LO V ri O M r1 O M M Ln M Ln Ln M m LO ri r-1 O N N O Ln -1 LO (Y) M LO M LO U U r� ri ri r-1 ri ri -1 ri ra ri r-1 1-4 11 ri N r-I r1 ri O r-4 O r-1 O r1 O r1 O r--1 O .--1 O r4 O 1-4 O e--1 O .-4 O r-1 O r-i O r-1 O ri O Lr) O O O Cn W � W cn Cn Z Cn a co a U > z z z cn M 0 U H U H H z Q z Q Q 0 0 0 Ln a >> cn to cn z cn z O H W tz 0 U w U w U W a w w w w w w >4 >H z z w a >4 n w w 1 C4 C4 a x x Q a < H H H H O (c. O C14 cn CL' U H H � W a H H H W H a z 3 0 S 0 3 0 3 0 m 0 3 0 w a a s z z w 0 a m a w a 0 w 0 w 0 w m H z >• Cl a Q x Z FC x a 1:4 x z Q x 06 Q< x a x U w co U w U)H < D a N H 3 < a a O w w w w w w H H a w F-I (z w >• rz < x x U O H H w O H O H O H cn a z < < < < < < < O O O O O O O O LO Ln O O O O O O O n O >+ UP U H r-1 O w U r 4 O w U . 4 O w U .-4 O w U r-4 O w U 1-1 O w U O r1 E-H 0 O '-1 E-L 0 1- .-4 G] r, r-1 W O O 0 z O 1-4 x a O r1 U z -1 O O E+ Q O H H M O PPE-1 =) M O n m O a ` 0ti w < U FC < Q 2 < Q < < < < < < Q Q �C 008 z r-1 r) N Ln M v Ln �D r O M w r N m o O r1 N M < C c -4 C 17 LY' -IT C' IT Krr-+ 4 r-I -4N L() Lo Ln Ln a 0 F z N O 0) N \ c x -1 U 00 rn 00 00 0o 00 m 00 00 00 00 00 00 0o 00 0o 00 00 00 0o O W F N N N r1 N N N N N N N 1-1 r-4 r1 ri r1 N N N N 0 < ri 11 1-1 r--1 r-( r1 1-4 ri e1 r-I r1 r-1 r-1 r-I r-I 1-4 1-4 ri -4 r1 a w m H F F H H F F H H H H H F F H F F H H H r� r� r N lD O O O O N O O O 00 m r-1 O M m M m M E-H O Ib O r O O O o r O O o O O m o N .1 N r1 z H W z M M c M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 \D r r 4 0 0 00 0 07 x D ri m 00 0 Ln Ln Ln t.D M Ln o 00 (V r r1 r r-1 Y, O N ri 31 N r-1 rr) .-1 M a V' N l0 Lo O N O M 00 07 r 0 r 0 k� r) v 1� o 0G o to r1 lD 00 00 O H m 0 lD N r 1 C N < M (M -4 m a r-( W a \ H a a a as w as H z z z z z z W �-. �.. < > z OE- HE- H ME-4 OOOOOOH > F 0 x 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z 0 W" a H H F H F x E+ £ E E H W H H a "' "' `/' `/' "' U) CG OI CL a Co Z W z CIG a cn W m m m to 0 11 CA O 14 O W O W O x O W w w w w W O ❑ O x i m m x x x x > z w❑ ❑ 0❑ 11 ❑ U❑ a s r4 r4 a a w❑ x a x x cz C4 z Q> z U a z w z a z a z z 0 0 0 U U U z z z O 0 z x 0 0 0 0 H (n W W z W W W a W z W H 11 11 1--1 11 11 W O W CH EZ4 O O Cu Lu Lv 44 W z > O > W > a > > x x x x x x > x > " H 44 44 H H .. ❑ 11 x H D ] W W W W W W W z z" 1" z z z z 3 a E U) a >>>>>> < D D D D D D D m W U W r H O LZ < N O O W N r Lo > 1 > m O lD Lo Ln kD .1 Lo Lo L.D a) r N O o M (M z z x ('M N N O r r 00 00 0) m Ln r1 (`') Ln Ln r1 r-1 m M H ❑ H O N r--I N w M (M (Y) (y) M M M Ln Lo Lo a) N N Lo Ln H z r kD M o O O O o o M M A a) a) Lo Lo r-( r-1 ❑ O N r1 N r r r r r r O N N r-1 r-1 a% m N N 11 x < z a Q m w m a 1 0 o w H Ix O 00 0 o O M M M rn M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w kD o 0 0 o c c c cr qT o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m �D lD o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E D Ln rn r-+ r-i M rn rn rn m rn m r r r r r r r r r z M O Q o O r-1 r-1 r-I -4 -1 r-( o r--1 -4 ri r-I r-I r-I r-I r-( lD l0 l0 lD lD w w w ko W lD �o lD w H z M M N N ri r-1 ri r I ri r1 r-1 ri r r M V M C M C D Lo Ln O 0 Lr) O O 0 o O O Lo Ln Ln Ln Lo Ln Lo Lo Lo O 1-1 Ln Ln L() Lo Lo Lo 1 M M C V U U ri r-i 11 r-1 r1 r1 r-4 r-1 r-1 ri r1 r-I r1 r1 1-4 1-1 1-4 11 r-i ri a 0 r--1 O r4 o 1-1 O r-I o 1-1 O Ln O Ln 0 Ln O LI) O L.() O Lo o r-( O r-A O r-✓ o 11 0 1-4 o r1 O r-) O o r-1 1--4 m 0 0 Ln a Q 1 r4 z CO F-4 a 0 U) a z F w w z o > D O �+ U E-+ 0 0 M O o r I :D Q x U) Q m C7 z a m 0 N O z m U z F-1 a Q U H z w x t23 z 0: a w m 0 Ln r1 Ix G] m aa a a aa a a a a a a4 as a a a a a a a a a a a w w w w w w D D D D F E-H H F F F E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z z z z z z w w w w w w z H H H H H H H H MCQMCQCQM H z z z z z z z z a a a a s D D D D D m D D 6-4 U) F F H F F H z W W W W W W W W to cn cn to v) cn F-1 O ❑ ❑ ❑ C� ❑ ❑ ❑ m m m m m m co U U U U U U U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 M M M M M M O r1 r-I r1 r-4 1-4 -1 14 r-4 -1 -1 1-4 r-4 r 1 r-1 r 1 0 o O O O O O O cn Cn co C7 co co H ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ m m m m m m m U U U U U U U U 009 z yr Ln LA r m r-1 N M 1:7 Ln l0 r m M O ri N M cr c Lr) ON lD Ln • N N N N N N N" N M m m m Ln m M M Ln O H z N O 01 N \ Ln x r-I U m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m rn m m O W E-H N N N N N r-1 r-i .-+ 4 r-1 r♦ r-1 r 4 ri r-I r-I r-I ri N ri . -1 N . N -1 1-1 1-1 -4 rH r-1 '-1 r-i r 4 r-I r1 ri -1 t-1 r1 -4 r--1 ri ri r-1 r-i r-1 ri r-i a s 00 H H H H H H H H H H H H HP H H HP H HE-4 H H E+ 14 r-I m O r-1 fn 0) O f n r O r1 r lD N N m m lD l0 O l0 U-) O m O M F O m O N ri O r-1 m ri lD O N -�T C r r O O Ln 01 r O r i O z H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W z r N NC; m O M Ln O O Ol r-I l0 lD �r cr m m Ln Ol O1 C M O O m N r r-i O r r-i c' -4 v r r r r 1 I r O r1 lD 01 YL 0 ri M I I r m M a N O c ri O m r + O Ln r O ri o cr U rn D: ; r� rn O m H H m H .-+ W c r-1 V H z r U m M 3 W cn U D: cn W 0 r.0 F U H a U a' z U W O W co z t4 to to a a w a a z z a \ a z a w FC D rC cn cn m m ul cn m m cn H a 0 w Q m Q H Q U z F C] F F H H H H H F H H H F H z H U H z H Q E-H >C 0 0 0 a x a a a a x x a a Z x H 0 w W 0 H O a 0 w W H E-+ a E+ a < Q Q H U C) E-H H w H O F H a a a a a a a a a a a a h1 0 >+ w H H a cn cn co co cn a x z I I I I I D: Ca U a H x C4 Eu O H xM: x x x O cn O W W W W W W W W W W W W W O Gu \ 0 I-+ 0 W O 0 rz x Lx x a a 0 z o a r-a a .4 a a a a a a .4 a a o O w 0 a o .a o cn z U 0 0 0 0 0 z W z U U U U U U U U U U U U U z 0 z H z V z 0 "M 44 C4 C4 L4 C4 W W w H H H H H H H H H H H H H W E H W m W "W z 14 " V-i H H H > x > x x x x x x x x x x x x x > 0 a > Q r' x > U C] z z z z z 14 W w W w w w W w w w W W w U < H W H Lo x O x O O > > r' > r' > > > > > r' > > M a a W L14 U W Ql V' r-i N Ln M M M r-i N Ln C' M h1 C) (1' m m m m m m m m w lD Ln Ln m Ln lD O W N N N N N N N N N N N N C V' lD I > CA N m m m M N N N N N N N N N N N N r-1 N r m z z x M ri r-1 M M I I I I I I I I I i I 1 O .-1 M N H C] H O Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 M m Ln H z tf) rn M Ln Ln ri r-1 r 4 r-1 r-1 r1 r 4 r-1 r-i ri r1 ri LT U a r x N N N N N r r r r r r r r r r r r Ol L14 L" N FC z a < uo W cn a I 0 0 w F x o O o O 0 o rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn r+ o r Ol O W O O O O O O d V v I;r V C V' IT d a C' � %7 ri O Ln C O O Cl O O O O w l0 l0 to w w l0 lD w lD lD lD l0 m O eT lD O D r r r r r rn m m Ol Ol Ol Ol 0) m m O1 0) Ol m M Ln m rn r z r--1 r-i 1-4 ri Iq C' r-1 r-1 r-i ri ri r-i ri r1 r-I ri r A ri r1 O Ln M r1 M H lD l0 lD w lD lD lD l0 lD to to to lD l0 to lD l0 lD to r m V lD lD z r M CT M N N O ri N M Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl Ln O M C}' Cr C' d' Vr Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Lo Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O Ln M U Q r-1 O r-♦ O ri O 4 O r1 O r-4 H .-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r--1 r-I ri r1 ri r-i r-I ri N N r� ri r-i r-I r1 O ri O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O o O Ln O Ln O Ln O Ln O r-i O Ln O z U H z U a a a a a o U) H x M a a a a a G4 U U IZ-1 z o a a a a a C) � a 0 a U z H H >4 a 0 Ln cn :n m co in O W a H FC F z z a a x W W 4 a H 0 E x O w H. H H H w Z OG 0 a z z z z z z cn H H H H H H H H H H H H H W w a a cn H x n a o w cn cn cn cn cn cn m cn cn cn cn cn > > a a w a s a w w w w w w w w w w w w w O O W (4 cD �H a H H H H H a O o a x O o o O O o o m O c� c� x x w a x w w w w w a a a a a a a a a a a a a U U a a< O o 0 0 o o a a a a a a a D: a D; a D: a Ds � s a Q a a o a< a a a Q Q a a a Q a Q� a a a o C)O O 0 U) H E. z W U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U z O > O O O O O Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r O D r-1 ri ri r-I r-i () 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln Ln M lD M O �H O O O O O O m M m M m (r"1 m M l"1 m M M M O O O O O U H 0 0 0 o C] a Iz cx rz oG D: cx oG cx D: cz D: cz a 3 3 ar a u u u u u u u u u v u u u u u u u o O o u u u u 0�1,i 010 lO N M cT Ln tD r1 N M z Ln M M M cr C' a v' --w c v' v - G' Q Ln Ln Ln o tD ,o ,o tD lD lD tD Ln Ln Ln O H z N 0 01 N \ tD x U OD 00 00 W OD OD OD 00 00 O OD OD OD 00 W OD OD 00 00 00 00 00 OD 00 00 00 co O O W F N ri ri .--4 ri r-q ri � ri ri r-i ri �4 ri ri N N N N N N N N N N r-t ri --1 U < r--1 '--I r-1 ri r-1 r-i r-i H ri ri ri ri ri ri r-i ri r-1 r-4 '-1 r-1 r-i -1 ri ri ri ri 1-1 ri a s W F H H E- HE- HE-4 E-+ H H E1 F H H H H H F F H F H H H H H H ri r-1 •• r r ri Ln ri 00 c' vT cW o lD M OD o 01 o OD c M a) N M M M U) Ln OD 00 M H v' (N r V' C' C' 0) 00 Ln tD N 0) N 00 r-i M O0 ul M r N M O M v N N 01 z F W z 01 Cil O O O OD 01 N On Ol M N r r C' 01 M OD N N M Cil tD N O H 0D 0D Q M to M r-i OD C' tD r-1 N tD N ri r r r-i Q' M r r-I M N r-1 C cT ri Ln tD N �+ O a CI4 � r-+ 0 r N CD c m o x rn o �C r Ln 3 N w r Q H r-i U) E-A U 0 F FC 0 w H a 0 Q F O H U) W [L H O(Yi z H a U U) w Q a Q z w > w QH 3 >+ H> H U a M z w cn . a a a, Q U) v) H s a a Q U) cn H 14 a a Q U) cn H a a a Q U) cn H a a a D cn . a a a, Q M v) H ..a a a Q U) v) F-i 14 a a Q U) cn H a a a D U) cn H s a a Q U) cn F-1 14 a a Q co Fi a a a Q M v) Fi s a a U U) cn H .a a a Q U) cn Fi a a4 a Q U) cn H 1-a a a D U) H a a a, Q U) cn . a a a ::) U) H a a a D U) H a a, a Q co cn H a a a Q U) cn H a a a M U) cn H a a a n U) H a a a> M U) a Q z W m H a a a :D U) cn i-i a a a n U) m 1-i a a a �D U) U H 0 z H o H W Q I Q H x 2 H GL' W Oa E Q z M O tD M N M OD a U r-f 0 O m Ln Ln H U ri 0 W lO m Q' F-i Q ri 0 ri N o N .7 U ri 0 O 00 O m x Q r-I 0 r r-i r N > U ri 0 V' Ln m v' N U ri 0 N In ri O CQ Q ri 0 cr tO 00 O CO Q r-1 0 LP) M ri OJ M Q ri 0 O O lD N " Q r-i 0 V' OD v M Ux Q r-I 0 N Ln r C' H Q r-i 0 N Ln r c' F-1 Q ri 0 r r-i M r H Q ri 0 M O M ri H Q -1 0 M o M r4 H Q -4 0 M M M r H Q r-1 0 m r c' Ln " Q r-1 0 N m N m H Q ri 0 v Ln Ln Ln U ri 0 lO N Ln N Q r-i 0 r N r Ol Q r-1 0 m N m LP) Q r-i o N ri M 00 01 ri N r-a M 00 M ri N r-i (Y) OD Ol ri a z a � a4 w Im a 1 O 0 w H a E4 mLn iM Ln O O CD O O CD O O CD O O CD O O CD O O (DO O O O O O O O CD O O O O O O O O CD O o O N O co O o r-i ri OD O O CD O O O O O O O O O O O (DO O O O O O O O CD N O OD •V OD CD o O o J z H m O to ri O r ri O r r-1 O rr r-1 O r ri O r r-i O r r-I O r ri O r r-i O r r-i O r M O rr r-1 O r ri O r M O r ri O r M O r r 1 O r ri O r ri O r 1 O r r-i O r ri O r ri O r r-1 O r M O r M O rr r 4 o r z O U N 1 r r-1 Ln v ri Ln c r 1 O N r-i Ln M r-1 O IT r--1 Ln v' r-f Ln c ri Ln IT r--1 Ln v ri Ln v' N Ln c r-i Ln IT r-i O N M Ln -1 N O N M Ln 1 N O N N O N N o N N O N ri O c' ri O c ri O c' ri O N M L) ri M Ln ri r-i O N U Q ri O r-t O ri O ri O ri o ri O r-1 0 ri O ri O ri o ri O ri 0 r-i o r-1 O ri o ri O ri O r 1 o ri O r-i 0 r-i O r-a O ri O ri o r-4 O ri 0 ri O ri O IT r-i ri r-i ri ri r 4 r-i ri ri 1 _1 ri ri ri ri ri r1 r-i ri _I ri r-i r-1 r-i 1-4 r-i r-1 a x a w w w F-I H H CD o a FC I W a >4 < a< U) H H z 01 a Cr.1 a 0 Q z W F CO z O U v) Q x H z O U va w u: a x W W H O a a 0 U cn w a a X W W H O a x 0 U cn w a a x W W H O a a 0 U cn w x a X W W H O a x 0 U v) w a a X W W F O a a 0 U v) w a a x W W H O a x 0 U cn w o4 a X W W F O a a 0 U cn w a a X W W H O a x 0 U cn w a a X W W H O a a 0 U cn w oG a X W W F O a rz 0 U U w a a X W W H O a a 0 U cn w n: a x W W F O a a 0 U cn w a a X W W H O a a 0 U cn w a a X W W F O a rz 0 U cn w a a X W W H O a a 0 U U) cn w a a x W W H O a x 0 U cn w x a x W W F O a x 0 U cn w 04 a X W W H O a a 0 U U w cz a X W W H O a a 0 U cn w a a X W W H O a a 0 U cn w a a x W W H O a a 0 U cn w DG a X W W F O a a 0 U cn w x a x W W H 0 a a 0 U cn w 04 a X W W H 0 a rz 0 U o U) U) w z H U) o W O U H cn O U o (n U) W z H U) 07 O U E-a (O O U Q U) U) w z H U) W O U F U) O U z D O U U < 0 H H U > Ln ri ri z O U o Ln ri cz 0 U 0 0 ri C4 0 U 0 Ln r-1 a 0 U 0 Ln ri a 0 U 0 Ln ri w 0 U 0 Ln r1 a 0 U 0 Ln ri z 0 U 0 Ln r-1 x 0 U 0 Ln ri z 0 U 0 Ln ri Z 0 U 0 Ln r1 a 0 U 0 Ln ri a 0 U 0 Ln r-i w 0 U 0 Ln -1 a 0 U 0 Ln r 1 0: 0 U 0 Ln H a 0 U 0 Ln ri a 0 U 0 Ln ri a 0 U 0 Ln r� a 0 U 0 Ln ri a 0 U 0 Ln ri a 0 U 0 Ln r-i a 0 U 0 Ln r f a 0 U 0 Ln ri a 0 U 0 Ln O co O U 0 Ln O co O U 0 Ln O co O U Oil z < C' Ln r- lD m to m l0 to Lr) O 1` 1-1 1` N 1` M 1` Vx r- O H ri H (N r-I �D In I` In O Ln Ol Ln O to r-i lc N lD M to Vr l0 0] 0 F Z N O Ol N \ � x U 00 00 0o OD 0o 00 ao 00 0o Oo m m rn OD m m OD co OD 00 co m O w F r-i N N N ri N N N N N N N N 14 .--1 -4 H -4 1-1 .1 r-i r♦ U' a' 1-I .1 r-i .1 '-i -4 r-4 r-i ri -1 r-i .-1 rA ri ri r-1 4 r1 -4 r-i r-1 r-i i 00 H H F H F H H H H F F H H E-F H F+ H H F H H H a a r� ri w co N In If) '1 '1 ') Lr) lf) -�T r-I Ol O O O O O O Ul 00 0D M H r- [- f- O Lr) Ln m a1 14 l0 N .-1 O O O U') O O N C N Z H W z Ol l0 r: Ol to 01 Ol O 1` O ri tf) l0 N O O O M O O m 1` M M M r to ri l0 r 1 c lD rn 1` Ln Ir) N O in �+ 0 l0 H M l0 Ln C' r- v' N r- M Ln iM -4 cT Lr) O I r1 N a M O O O u7 N N C-4 Ln N M C4 0 Z a OD O � 0 r Ln In CO U U Cx H M Ir N m cO U) N r a tit U W M H ri H O r-1 W 0: U) U d' z M M a O E-+ N U Z W r� Z 0 1-1 > Z H N w 04 fZ H H H a H co co w U Z 0 a z a a x a a a a a U U U U U a U a Q Q w W w w w > > > > > x w z H H H F E-1 H H H H U) U) v) tO U) U) H Z F U U O O U O Q �C Q O O FC O 0 >> O F F H 3 3 3 3 H E+ a a a a a 3 H a H U) co " a m U) U) a C><.1 0.'. (� fZ 04 H H H H w a � Z H H O H w w w 0 0 z z z z z 0 0 a x a a rz x 0 U O UU u > z a. U H a H a H a n z C4 F 0 Z H x H d4 F--1 x H `.4 " `.4 C z U) E+ (n F U) H n Z O E-1 O E+ O H O H 0 F m M 0 Z D x o z H U) a a a w w z z z z z w x x w H H H H H W H w F H W a a a a > C/) > H H H H H > (� C7 > z z z z z rc-O,y > m > z z o H D .'� n H fx 0x CZ a s H H H L Ou O U) C.1 w U) U 0 0 0 0 0 a a a h h h h h a H u E4 Cu U W I I 1 I I 1 I I O (D O O O 0 0) 0) u7 r1 to I I 1 110 0 W '1 00 m w H -1 N Ol l0 w N I- Ol > I > Im M N N N N N N r♦ ri O 0) c M z z x N N N N N M M C V v (1) M O0 N N N N 1-1 M OD 01 Ol H t7 H .'7,. OD r-1 r-i r-i I- r- 1` I` I` I` OD m N LD lfl lD l0 lD to M M O H z m O O O r-i of m 0) 0) m M O O N N N N N N OD O O Q H x -4 N N N r-1 Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol O l0 l0 ri r-1 r-I -4 1 r-1 '--I r-1 r-i < Z a < m w ao a 1 0 0 w H O V v W N OD 0 N 00 v' OD OD O -T -zr �T M M (n M M rl) O M cM 0] 00 00 00 00 Ln W 00 00 OD 00 00 co OD l0 w w lD l0 Lo O In Ln x O LO u7 z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O In O O r r r la r r r r r r r r to to lfl to In lfl to In cn H z N m M N r-i CM VT M M M cP V' cr ri (N r-1 H I- r- M r•i r-1 D Lr) Lr) ur) In 0 Ln In In Ln In U-) In u) un o Ln In u) Lo un In Ul 0 M r i -1 M M C Q r-i 1-1 1-1 C C V N N N N CM M N V N r-1 r-1 O Cl O O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O e1 ri -4 r-i r-1 r-1 e--1 .--1 ri ri H r-i H r-i '--1 r1 r-I e-i r-i -4 ri ri a x x Ix U w w w w x x x x x }I � >• w w w w w w >>>> H H H F E- a a a U U U U U U 0 a Zz a a a a. a s H H H H H H z a a a (4 O O O O O a a a >>>>>> M w w w w x z z z z z a a x a x a x O Como < U) U U w w w w w w U) 0 3 44 w CLd Cu 44 U) V) cf) V) U) U) H U U 1n H 0 0 0 0 0 U U U a z z a U) Cn w U) w H H H 0x a w z 04 a Q7 H H w w w w 0 cn a C4 a O O O O O O o z z z z cn rz z z z z h N H H H H H H H a MCI) w w w w w U U (-) H H H H H H a a < U) cn v) U) H H F F H W W W z z z z z z z x E W E+ O p O O A << Q FC < a a a < < < < < Q m W w a z CQ F-1 m OU W a0 O 3 3 3 3 3 W W W h h h h h h cn EE• E 4 < O O O O O % W W W W w H H E+ H H F H H H H F EI >4 01 U U U U U) z z z z z W fZ Z Z fZ Z a s x z Z Z �C o: H H H H U) O O O O O w W W w w W W w w W W w a a>r 0 c0 U) cn cn 0 z z z z z U) cO cn cn U cO U) u) cO U) U) U) a o O O O O a r.> << Q< w w w w w w w w w w W w (n z U U U U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z 0 > O O O O LO O O O O 0 N 00 0D O O O O 0 0 O In LO O In Ln Ln Ln O O O O O O 1-4 r-H r-1 c C' C' vl �r V' to l0 l0 0 ?I O O O O O N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O (D UP M M U) U) 0 z z z z z U) U) U) U) U) m (n Cn m U) U) U) U H O O O O a < Q Q< Q W w W w w w w w w w w w Q U U U U U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0--) 012 z Ln In r oo m O r4 N M cT un l0 r m �r m Ln Ln to rn O l0 • l0 l0 to to to r r r r r r r r ri r -+ r r1 r ao r O E+ Z N O N co x 1-1 U Oo w m cv co 00 00 00 m ao m oD Do rn 0) co rn OD m OD OD m O W E-1 r l r-1 r-1 .-I .-+ r-4 r-i r1 r-1 r4 r1 r l r1 N N -4 N N N H 11 N C7 Q r-I -4 --1 r-1 .--1 ri r-1 ri r1 ri -4 r1 -4 -1 r-1 r-i r-1 r-I r-1 r1 r1 r-1 a s m H H F 4 H H H H H H H E-F E-F E-4 H E-+ H H H H H H H •• O O O O OD N N O O rn Do v O un O (n Lr) 0 0 O O O M H OD l0 N l0 N 11n N w N 01 w r O M r r m O O O O O z H W Z Ln r LP) Ol r r 1 Ol N L) ui M v OD N OD r O O O O O u7 M r O 1n r r-i m r qp M r-I c N r-1 O N O N 00 O QO >4 O m 4 N O U') M v' N N DD 01 c M N OD N O c OD O < M M a r M in O O O N r Ol O O O c ao r o z o U o [-4 r O N N h1 OD O Cca to N cr a O ao W N M Q EL4 rI W z a x H H L Q U U -+ H z lz W I z O Q H a a 0 a a s H a a x Q Q CD Q H Q Q Q W Q U z UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUH H N H Z 3 H a H H H fL W O F-+ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > O H O H U O H w Z Q M O H O H O H > U O Q H IU-I O a, H H u H U H U H U H u H U H U H u H U H u H u H u H u H U H U Ix O cn w w O to WL O W O W H !L' O > C7 z O Q CZ a O Q a r r r r r zo x z z U G4 a a fL' a d. CY. cL z a z u z a z f1 Z H Z cU cn W w H Cn w 0 E-H z O U H z O U H z O U H z O U H z O U H z O U H z O U H z O U H z O U H z O U H z O U H z O U H z O U H z O U H z> O U w LL a> m U) W H to W 0 W > x U Q m U z> O U W .,4 C4 Q a W > 0 U> a Q w 0 z Q a U W O O H C_1 a I I O > z z W m O m O M Ol M Ol m m T l0 v' 110 C to v' l0 O l0 O w O l0 O to N to N l0 l0 .-+ M N to M in .--1 O N O m r O r OD M ri C' Cl Q H H �G z O r-1 O -i O r1 O r1 O r1 M to M ui M to M u7 M Ln M to OO Ln M u-) r-I r-i r•-1 r-1 In Lr) N r1 O O (r) O1 O Q z a4 Q m W m a 1 O O w H Z W m v (M to v M u-) v M o v M u) v (M to v (M Ln c M Lo c M in v m u) v M Ln v M N v M Ln v M Ln 'T M Ln C M u7. O O O N M Lr) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O z H N 0 ul) u-) 0 ul u-) 0 in to 0 to in 0 u) 1n 0 u) u) 0 Ln u) 0 a) to 0 Ln Ln 0 Lo Ln 0 Lo Ln 0 u7 Lr) 0 u7 u7 0 Ln to 0 Lo r v lD in CD l0 u-) H l0 Ln r1 to Ol O l0 r M l0 m Cl w z m O U v' a) M -1 1n IH r1 in 1-1 IT in ('M r1 1n N r-1 Ln N r1 in C 'T u) f'M r1 11n r1 1--1 1n N r--I Ln C' C' Ln M r1 1n -4 v' Ln m r-i 1n N N l!') v OD O r M Ln v m Ln v r-i Ln (n N u7 v m OD 1p U Q ri O r-1 O e--1 O r1 O r1 O r1 O r-i O r1 O r-I O r-I O ri O r-I O r-I O r1 O r1 O ri O r1 O r1 CDO r-1 r--1 O r-1 O .--1 O r-i r-I r--I r1 r-I r-I r1 r1 r1 r--1 ri r-1 .--1 r-/ r-i r1 cr -1 r H -1 1-4 v' U U z z H H U z U a a H z Q Q M o N (4 1 w a m Q Q w cn H H z H a Q a lu z O 0 z W U z H (n a, W H H z W cn w U z H (n w w H H a W cn w U z H (n w w H H rz W U) w U z H (n as w H H rx W w w U z H w W H H a W M w U z H w W H F+ x W w w U z H as W H H 1% W M w U z H w w H H a W M w U z H cn w 14 H H x W M w U z H w W H H x W M w U z H w w H H a W w w U z H w w H H Ix W w w U z H a, W H H a W M w U z H cn w w H H a W M w U z H cn a w H H a W w w H O a x U w H w H H z H a C7 z W w cz E-+ z a H w H 0 Cla cn x a H z s E'H W H 0 to x s H d W a Q H H x cn U O � Q > W 0 > Q z O O U U Q O >H H H U > u) to O to w 0 u-) to O to w 0 In l0 O cn w 0 Ln to O u] w 0 1n w O to w O In l0 O cn w O In 110 O w 0 Ln to O cn w 0 un to O to w 0 1n l0 O cn w 0 Lo to O to w 0 al to O cn w 0 1n l0 O cn w O u) l0 O to w 0 u-) l0 O cn w 0 O 1n O W H 0 O V7 O W x 0 O O ,-i x .a W Cl O 1-4 x a w O r-I O a O1 W Cl O r-1 C>~ cn W O L O Q > w z r1 N r m m O r-1 M *r (14 Ln l0 r M m v Lr) O m m r r r m m m m m m m m m 00 m m F Z N O 01 N \ 01 x -1 U m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m O W H H 1-4 N N N N N -1 r-1 N 4 N N O 4 4 H H H 1--4 -1 -4 r-1 H 11 r1 ,1 ,--4 .-+ 1-1 -4 .--1 a a H H H H H H H H E-H F H H H F F H H r-1 r-I O O O O N O O O O N O O O v O l0 M H O O O O l0 O M Cl O l0 r O O r l0 z H W z O to O O l0 O m O N a; x O N m O N O) v' Ln N l0 Ln N (Y) M Ln 1 a4 O O N O O N C O �O O 0 1p M 0 cr l0 c o Ln l0 m N 01 m N M OD N 0) m U) m Ln 1.0 IT M O r (M M C4 m ,1 M r1 a a .1 U z W O O H In U) U) H u1 a a a s w w a a a a cn U) U) co a m a a < H H H H < H < ""< CL' < F < W W W W < $CC Q z O H O Z Z Z Z H 0 < E H O .a a .l a H 0 H U) H O Z H H O U) < U) < U) < U) Q H O OP .a O H 0 W H H rr Q F H a a F H E-+ F x x x x F O H F U H E-H n n (D i U U U U U) H a oc cz x IX U) U) cz w cz cz cz a a cz cz x cz cz cz U) 0 1-1 O W W W W O 0 O O w W O W O n n n n 0 w 0 W O W > fz n .a a .a a n H n w W n U a a n a as a as n H n H n H z U z U U U U z z z w w z Im z U z z n z n z a H U) W H" H H W a W rJ4 Gd W E W w H w a 1-4 a a w a W a W a w > x x x x> w> riw c" > H a> x> w w w w> x> x> a W W W w > O O W H W n n n n O O n U) > > > > O U U cz x > w U4 c" w U U U) W w U W 00 m r O M H n a c c m Ln v N 1,0 0) 0 w 1 U') c 1 1 1 Ln r 0 Irn > I > CQ v m m O M M M l0 v' v' v' I m m M z Z E r N H O In O O O O O O v' .1 r I H n H n r 110 m r O m 01 m O Cl O O Ln (n v H ,Z Ln In Ln Ln I N O O O O v Lf) M n H x v' c v v r r M m rn 0) 0) r r 0) � z a a w w m a 1 0 O w H (z rn m rn a) Co 0 0 0 o rn w 1.0 ��.o r o r W a IT c 0 m m O O qzr v vW c �r m O a �o �o 0 m m o 0 �0 w %D tZ Ln o m n Ol 01 01 O) Ln M M r m 0) m M z 11-4 ' 4 -4 .--4 C' O O M C' r-1 -i .--I r--I 1--1 O In O �0 110 w w r r w w w w w %0 w 1,0 m r H z 11 .1 '-I 4 M (M (n -4 e1 .-i .--1 '-1 r 4 r-1 r-1 N v' n O O O O In Ln Ln In in O O O O O O O LO O U Ln u-) In In .-1 .1 -1 N N Ln In In In Ln M in C U H IH '-i •-i 1 1-4 4 -1 r-1 .--1 H -1 -1 1-4 N a 0 0 0 0 o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Cl In In Ln Ln 14 H '-1 '-1 r 1 to In un Ln Ln 1-1 LO .1 a H U a w w w1 z M O H H a H 0 U > > W V) O 0x QZ 3 U) W U u) w 0 0 a a a a a a w U) cw En v) w z H FZ; H H H H w (n U) a w w H H La H a a H F H H a U U U U U U U U cn w WE- n n n n W 00 H H H H 00 .a z x x � H QQF-4 w w a U U rj4 w H n n n o >4 >+ r� >+ a rz cz a a FC FC rz < a a rz a cz w H MCI) H H z H z N U U U w w a Q 0 a a a a n cz cz a x cz (n U) U) m H H 3 W W W w £ H Gu W Cwca CHc. I~ Cal Cal Cal Cal C�7 0 3 z 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 r r O O O 0 0 0 0 LO o r n O O O O r-1 -q r-i r1 -4 c 14 '--1 .1 -1 H N O O N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O UEH-i a a a a n tz z w w w w w w w w 44 0 < U 0 0 0 0 0 U) 014 Z Q OD O m OD %D co r co m m O M H M " 0) O M H M M 0) N 0) M O) v' 0) r H OO H m H O N H N N N M N C' N LO N l0 N r N m N w O H Z N O rn N O H U 00 00 m M 0o co 00 co m 00 CD OD co OD m m (n 0) m m m m m m 0) 0) O W H N N N N H .-i H .--4 N N H N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N E Q W H H H H H F+ H H H H H H H H E+ H E 4 H H H H H F4 H Fl H a a H H O O a l0 H O N Ln O O M r N l0 IT v' H N H OD Ln OD OD O O m M H O. O N M l0 �n 1� OD O if) O. CV 0� c c N H c M O. M O H r 7 7 W z Ln CD CD ul I'D v O r Ln N 00 CD O O l0 N N N c N In N. O. x z LO Lin H m O M w u-) r al N v N N v M 00 N m N N M N v' 7+ 0 to 00 H M N c H l0 O N IT N H N Q v M H a 0 0 OD rn Cl w M Lf t.f) N Ln Da a O N M H to v' a a 00 H W W z co O O f� H x x FC z z H 0. w W cA w a U) cn a a a a H H x z w w H a U U H O O \\ O O x 0 > > O W H H Z Z H H H H W H CO U) H H a o a HH ff a a H H x a 0 0 a cn cn cn cn cn cn cn m cn w cn cn m w cn w O H O U CD O W W O < Q O W z z 0 W w W w W W w W W W W W W W W W > a 0 z z O C' 0 0 x x O 0 O O a H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H z U z H H z << Z a H () U z H cn w x x W W W W U u H a w a as a as a a a a a a a a a a a a w > (n U) > .a a> << cn w a a> a as a a a a a, a a a a. a a, a a a H H > > W W H H .'D M O .7 a D O 0 O O a D O 0 0 O U) 3 3 x x a a r>r Q cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn U) U) cn cn cn co cn U) W r-4 U G] 0 0 " M a H H l0 M l0 lD r r to N m OD 0\ 00 H H H O 0 W O O N H to Ln co OD OD to r l0 N w r r Ln N > I > W if ) Lf1 r M Un M Ln N cM Ln M M Ln Ln c'M H am C O Ln r r r Ln z z x O O 0) 0) OD N r OD O O N N H H O H O N H O N N H O H 0 H H H N M M Ln vp vT N N N N Ln Lr) N v' N H N Ln H H H Ln z H M m M M M M O O H H O O O N O H H H H H H H Q x Cl O M M m M m M r O N N 00 m r I'O N O l0 N m m a M �C z a < at W ao a I O O w E+ a N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O r r r 0 u) M r r o o r r r Ln r W (`') cM O O O O O O O v O v, � v. O H m v' v' O O v v -.w N ar Ln to O O O O O O 0 l0 O 00 00 OD 0 w w co cD O O co OD co m m O to Ln r r H H H H H M m M rn m M M M m m M Ln M M M M M z O O C) M N N N N N O O O O 0 O Cl O O O O O O O O O O �o w tlo �o �o � �o �o r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r H z v' v Ln Ln r r r N r N r q;r M cw r N M�r a c M M (M v IT d' 0 H H u'> u) LO Ln LO o Ln 0 Ln Ln un un Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln an Ln u) Ln O r r M M M M M N M N (M cT M M C c cT -T �� a v-IT a U H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H F� 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (D O O O w v' H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H U) U) CY) W W O E-4 [-4 O < < LO H H W W a U U 9 9 U U U U U U �C 0 O E- H z z z z z z U) U) U) U) HHHHHH FC FC Q U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H H H H HP H HP E4 H H H E4 H W H o Q a a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a z w w a s Q a rC a s as a s as as a as a a a a a a a [Q H Q O O O O O O W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W a F-IU) H x x x x x x x x 0 o Q o 0 o ca ca 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q a a s z z x x x x x x w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w a O a a x x 0 0 0 0 U 0 .4 0 Q O O D D O D D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn H z x x h h x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x z 0 > o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O H H O O H H H H H H M M Cl) cM M M M M M rn M M (M M M c'M 0 �H O O H H O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U H a s a s < < < Q Q $:C x x x x x m x x Ix x x x x x x x U H O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q U x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 015 z 'QT Ln lD Ln W m O r r w m O .--1 N m T LO lD r --� Q m 0) Ol Q� Ql N M Cif .--� m m CD O O CD CD O O CDa O H z N O N u 00 00 00 OD OD ON 01 OD m OD OD OD OD CO OD co a0 OD co N O W F+ —1 —1 N N N N .-4 N H .--4 H H ri _4 e 1 ri H N C 7 < r-i r--1 r-i ri H H H -1 r-1 1-1 r♦ H H -4 r 1 1-4 ri 4 a m E 4 H H E+ H H H F+ H H H Hp H H H H H H H Ow -1 O c Ln r O r al 0 0 0 0 o r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M H O to M Ln O a) Ln O O O O O r O O O O O O O z H W z O N r C cr N O N Ln r 1 O O O Ln O O N z O lD Ln m Q' M r N 0 lD N r .--1 O OD O C' O Ln m >+ O 0 r N Ln -cr lD C-) OD Ln N Ln N Ln O co OD C' Lf) Cif O O r C' L,D M O O O r r O rC r d O N H O a C4 a a a x rD x z CD r N cz Ql H N N O H H H H . H H IT N 00 H N N `.G Ln < Q << Q Q w < w M (Y) N U a -+ w w w w w 44 Z w a H 0) r-1 Cn W r-+ H ❑ a w w w w w w a w< x 0 0 w cD w a \ to ❑ rC r� r� < Q < < < a z a a a a a a W L 4 W X cn x O cn a a a a a a CD a 0 a a a W a a H a \ a H H H H H 1-4 Q H Q> a H Q Q FC H< H > > > > > > a> a U Q z H U U H a H H < H W E+ \\\\\\ a\ a H a O O >> O w O cn O H O W O U C7 U C7 C7 C7 F+ C7 H 0 O w W" H cn U) H > H U H "H WE- Z Z Z Z Z Z> Z> Z E-H m U H < G] U H H H H H H H \ H \ H H a Cr H H a a OG a CG cr. U) a cn m cn cn cn cn a cn a cn a U O H O U U O E- O cn O (D O \ O H H H H H H W H w V-1 O Z > D: ❑ < Q❑ ❑ cn U) \❑ z❑ z❑ H H H H H E-+ Z H z H❑ H z U z a a z a4 z H H z �-1 z U z a x Z a a Z H a H a z H "M w H H W E W z z z z w `..4 W H W W W W W W W r.0 W W W x W > z z > H > Q > a > cn > > > > > > > H > H > > C7 ❑ O O w cz cz a s < w ❑❑ 0000 w❑ w❑ H U U z a a a a a ❑ Q FC FC x a cz FC a W t=1 U w H ❑ z d C O w M M rn > ) > W CD OD N r-4 H Nr am m r N H k.D M kD o ' + M Ln z z r r N N OD N r-1 r N N M M N N r-1 M 00 M H ❑ H O O 0 G' O O cr C' C' q:T cr V' C' O O U H z H H V' V' Ln C' 0) C' C' C' V' C' C' ❑ x W cQ M Cn r m 1-4 N r-1 r-1 H .-t H —4 r-1 r-1 '-1 -4 a FC z a < a w ao a o O w H a v, r O 0 0 M M W M cr O O O LO Ln cIi Ln Ln O O O Ln to D Ln L r H r-1 rn rn z O O M O O O O Ln w lD r r lD �.D E-+ Z d v N N N .'� Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln r-i -i O M M c lzr r r U U ri H -1 r� O o O o 0 o O ,-1 1-4 r-4 H —4 cT V' f" ) O 0 Ln a 1 W H a z > a a r� O a ❑ U) z H 44 w z O > O O >+ U H Q U U U H H �s Ec4 a Q a a h h 0 0 O o H -1 U) cn N w z W H h w U) w h 0 O i H U w U w U U U U a a a a O O O O a a a a a a a a a a a a h h h h 0 0 0 0 ri H r-1 r-1 0 o O o a cz x a a a a a h h I-D t-D O N �.D lD lD lD lD lD lD lD lD N O O M MMMMMMMMMN O O Ln 0 Ln Ln n Ln Ln to Ln Ln N O C,l Ln a) m m m m Cif Q) m m Ln M O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O �-+ N H r-1 -4 -1 1-1 r-i r-I 1-1 r-i M C' Ln H Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln o Ln Ln o Ln M r N N N N N N N N N H v H r-1 r-i H ri H H r-1 r 4 H H H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z O z z z z z z z z z z O U Cn cn (n cn to cn w m w cn H H H H H H H . H H . [-1 U) H H H H H H H H H H U E D: a cz cz a a a a a D; o w w w w w w w w w w w a H > > > > > > > > > > F+ � a Q a Q z U Un O w a a a a a a a a a a U H a a a a a a l4 a ,4 1•a H z w w w w w w w w w w cn x O O O O O O O O O O H a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a c� c� c� c� c� c� c� c� x u x cz a a x x a a x a x w 1+ H W W W W W W W W W W U O H z z z z z z z z z z O h x x x x ac x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H —4 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o H H 1-1 1-4 ri 1-1 —4 1-4 1-1 H ❑ 1-+ z z z z z z z z z z H O W H H H H H H H H H H (z 016 z Q N M N H a' U-) lD r OD a) -4 M N (M M M v" M Ln M N O a H O z 0� N N H O W U' U E-H Q N N .-1 N N ri co . r-1 N N -4 N N -1 N N r-1 N N r-1 (N N N N m N a) N 01 N 0) N m N x Q a a m H H H H H E-+ H H H H H H H H M H z H OD OD aD M O O O O O O 0) Ln O N v l0 O OD O l0 OD N N Ln O l0 O co W x❑ >+ z O 0 0 N 0 -1 o o O r -+ CO 0 r r-i un OD ao o .-4 v v M N lD a � r -+ O O l0 N O O O O 0 O Q\ Un O N C OD N Ln 0 �.0 N Ol OD OD O r-1 M O O O O Ln r OD r-i OD r 14 a hl O r r4 r-i r Lfl v OD v M N H z W c; �' M r l0 44 \ W H z w C� z H cn a U z a Q a Q x w W a Q a Q c/] w a a Q H x C.7 a Q a Q a Q a Q W H Q Q H ❑ z o H O H o a (D H O H o ❑ H o H a H 0 H O H o H O W a H 0 H O O .a W U H H H H Q H a H H a H H w H H H H z H W (D H Gu H O a H a O cn W U) 14 a O H U a O Q a a 0 x U) a O a < s O W a O a O cn W cn W U) W a O O H a O ❑ Q a O z O > z a U ❑ z H a H a ❑ z ❑ z W a ❑ z a w ❑ z U U) ❑ 0 z Q ❑ z U ❑ z H a H a H a ❑ z H Q Cl z co ❑ z U H U) w W > a a a a W > H z W > x w > W W > 0 z W w > *4 w > x U W > a a a a a a W > U w > W W > U) a U) W r" ❑ ❑❑ U) U) O U Q 44 W £ Q P4 H O r7 ❑❑❑ U) U) U) ❑ W z a U U w H ❑ O a W Ln OD r c' o r V N r OD -1 r > 1 z > z fYl x l0 OD M (n vT l0 In Ln l0 (M .-i O CO O OD O M a) r H ❑ H ❑ H x H M z l0 O 1.0 O r� d` cr N r-i O r Cr) O v Ol r .-1 O N O O N O O N O to O cM Q z a Q oa W as a 1 O O w H a W W o OD Ln r OD tf) oD cM Ln 0 O O o O 0 ri r l0 o O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 Co O o O O M 0) u) o O O 0 O (D z m O m O l0 CD 0) C' ri N r M M O U-) O (Y) O M O Ln Ln r r M H z M ri O r i O I Ln r Ln r♦ O to M Ln H Ln r Ln N O r ul c O r Ln ri in O U U M M N M .-i 1-4 M .-+ C r i N ri M r-+ N r-+ M ri r i -4 M N Q 0 ri 0 ri 0 ri O ri 0 r-1 0 ri O '-i O r-1 o ri 0 ri 0 ri O ri O r-1 (D ri O W H H L1 U) H U U U H x M 0 U z U z O O H U h-I H H W 0: O O Lf1 a H U) H U) w (n Lu H (n w H U) W H En W H (/) O a x H a Q 1 a Q z ,a Q z H a Q a < U w U w U) z H z < a z Q a z Q a z H Q 3 Q H m W CQ-� a z H~ U) U) Q H - U w 1-4D o o z H a o 0 U 0 U 0 U a a a 0 H Q ?+ Of O O H a H a w a H a U) x U) U) - U) - U) - W 14 3 O z W Q a Q a a o ❑ H U) a E-H M :DQ a w Cl)Q Q 0 w x U H w x U o w 3�t� O w o w o z Q H ❑ U a a H U) H w z w a4 x a a a a h a a a a ❑ z 0 2) > 0 Un 0 in 0 r-1 0 in 0 N 0 ri 0 in 0 ri 0 O Cl Cl 0 O 0 N 0 -1 0 m O >+ U H U H❑ O v) O cn O OI Q O U) Q O Q W O 0 H O z H o U O a 3 0 ri 3 0 H 3 0 O a Q O 0 U O a H- Q U x x a a a a a a a a a 017 z O ri N M c Ln lD r m m O r-i l0 00 N m O .-1 N m c' L r) r-1 r-I r-1 N N M M N M c• V' V' V' cc• IZ O H z N O Ol N Cl) \ - x r-4 U N CNN NNCNNNNNNNM m N m m m m m m m O W H N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N LV U < ri r-1 r-1 .--1 '-i r-i r-i r-I r--1 1-1 1-4 1-4 r1 -4 r-i r l r--1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 .--1 E FC 00 H H EF H H H H H E-H H H F H H F H H H H H H H a a .. O M O O1 to Ol m to lfl Ol O l0 O O OD O O O O O O O M E-/ O r O N d• N .--1 Ln Ln O m O O O O O O O (D O z H w z O O O M 00 r M O O O O r O U) L( Ln O O Ln x O M r- M OD O N Ln Ln u) N O .--I O O 00 Ln OD c' N v' co N >+ O M Ln M Ln Ln OD l0 M r r-I to O Ln N OD C' M l0 C a c N r-I O O M 01 O OD OD O r w O (� C' W O O N U) M O E, r4 O 00 a s L4 14 a s L4 to co M to H H U) r Ln N r> aC Q < < < < H to to H OD N U U U U U U U Z z Z ,Z, z H H U 0 M F-1 F- H H H " H V) H H H H H 0 Q > H U z z rZ z z 'z z U) C9 cn > x x x x x x x C] O C] F H z >+ co U U U U U U U Q FC z z H H a W W W W W W W z M w w z H Q W H H H H H H H a O a cn z a H H H F F x z 14 a z a \\ \\\ \\ rtr H Q w H Q Q < < O Q F F F H H F F z H H H U) Q H H H H H H > > g H H z H x H z z z z z z z WI-4 O O H < H O H < MWH a 0 Q o n o 0 0 Qz 0 cZ >+ a \ x Q 0 O H "H O a 0 F �E: 0 x 0 x 0 x 0 x 0 x x 0 0 O F H U z a a a a a a a U W H co U) g£ E E H a Ix U a a a x x£ x x x x z a LL' cZ U) cZ O H O O U W O H H H H H H H w< a O F O co O H H H H H H H > a O Q Q a a 0 o U Q U 2 G] c] U U U U U U U H v) w w w w Q Q Q Q a Q a rUi Q U w h w W w h h h h h h h W > w> w x> U U U U U U U a z w> O> a> O O O O O O O Q w x W O O O O O O O W< a a H a a Z a z cZ x x w> a a a a a a a 0 a cn a as as as a as a s w w U W rn v v r \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O W N \ \ Ln r-i r1 r 1 r-I 4 r-I r-1 > 1 > a O r1 r1 O O O O O O O O 0) co O I I 1 1 1 1 1 z z N 1 I O O O O O O O co m N O m r--1 r-t rH r-1 r-1 r-1 4 H Ll H O N N m m m m M m m O w r-1 Cl Ln O O O O O Cl Co H z Of \\ M M m M M M M v m v' N r O O O O O O O H x a I I N N N N N N N N N N l0 M N N N N N N N z a FC x w a a 1 O O L14 H rx O l0 0) O O O O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O W O c v O O O O O Cl O O O O Ln lD O O O O O O O ao O to 110 Cl o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E O 0) 01 r r r r r r r r r Lr) 0) Ln M Ln Ln 0) Ln Ln M z Lf) r-i 11 1p l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 w O O O M O O O O O O O H C' lD -.0 N N N N N N N N to lfl t0 l0 l0 lD l0 l0 to l0 l0 z O L-i r-1 O O O O O O O O d lD 01 M r-i N N r M 1:31 1p O O O O O O O O O O O Ln Ln Cl Ln Ln r-1 O OD O 4 Ln O O Ln Lo O O O O O O O O cT M r r i c r r l0 r r U U r-1 I-q 1-4 O Ln O Ln O L() O Ln r-i r-i r i 1 r 1 r I r 1 r-1 r 1 r-1 FC O O O r1 r 1 N N c+M m c N O O O O O O O O O O O .� Ln T) r r r r r r -4 r-I V• ri r-1 cT Q' C• C C' r-1 z z z z z z z z z z H H H H H H H H H H U) U U U U U U U > > > > > > > > > > O . H H H H H H M a x x a x a x x a x H o z z w w w w w w w w w w C) O O cn cn v) cn cn cn cn cn cn cn Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a H H a a a a a a a a a a < Q << Q z a Q Q Q Q Z H E-1 H H H H H H H H H H H a 1 co En U U U U U U U U U U `.G W Lri Lri W W Lb z z z z z z z z z z U H (n U) FC < Q Q<< Q Q<< O O z z z z z z z a z << z z z z z z z z z z a U O O O O O O O 1"I 0 U H F-A H H H H . H H H a a [:, 114 44 Gu L" Ga Gu 44 Cv E14 a a x z rx x a x >a+ fo U) 2 < CYi H - - I -A H - Ii F-1 H H. H H H a Q O a �: x z z z z z z z z z z z k U U U U U U U a 0 w O O O W " F-I H H H H H H t= w 44z z z z z z z z z z 0 > co O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O r-, r, r-1 .-, r-I , 4 4 M O O O r-1 , 4 r-i r-1 r4 -1 ,-I r-i r-1 r1 r1 r-I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O >+ O r-1 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 1-4 r4 rH r i r-i r-I r, U E+ cZ x Y. z z z z z z z z z z 3 X U U U U U U U U H H O O H H H H H H I --I a U x2: £ z z z z z z z z z 018 z 1.0 r m m O 1-4 N m v Ln l0 r N CT Ln l0 r m m O ri N M IT LO l0 r m O (n Q v v cr v Ln Ln to Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln N N N N N N M M M M M M M M Ln lO N 0L O H z N O 0) N v' \ � x ri U N N N N N N N N N (V N N N N M M N O W H N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U < r1 r-1 r-1 ri r-A .--1 '-i r-i .--1 r-I ri r1 r-1 r-1 r-I r-I r-I r l r i ri ri r-i r-i ri ri r-1 ri ri r-I r-I < 04 E-1 F H E-i H H H H H H H H H H H H H H E-1 F H F H H H H H H H H a a ri ri O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N m O Ln M 1-1 r %-0 M O N r ',D M r-i Ln M H O O O O O O O O O O Cl Ln O r M OD Cil 1,0 m r m Ln .-i Ln m OD O c m tD z H 14 z O O Ln O O O O O C O N r O 1` ( 1 CD N m r r m O Ln r N a O v M M ri Ln Ln Ln Ln ri N ri T Ln O N O v c N N l0 N m N N N r-i ri r �+ O M Ln m Ln v' qr c v' � m O ri O r-1 ri 1-1 -4 CV ri ri a' ri r1 ri m a O N Ln m m N a a a a a La a 14 a a a a a 1.0 r Q < #:4 Q < < < < < Q Ln ri U U U U U U U U U U U U U O " H H H H " H H 1-i H H H H N z z z z z z z z z z z z z x x x x x x x x x x x x x U U U U U U U U U U U U U W W W W W W W W W W W W W F H H F H F F H H H H H H \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ a H F H H H H H H F H H H H < z z z z z z z z z z z z z z H E-+ O E E E x x O O W H C7 C7 C� C7 C� U U C7 C7 C7 C7 C� C7 H E. U H O" H H H H H H H H H H H F H O w w W W w w W W W W W W W W W W O W > Z U U U U U U U U U U U U U p H . H H H H H H H H H H H H H H q H z U H Cn h F7 F7 h h h h F D F'n, F7 h F7 h W a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a W a w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0> al 04 a a ai a a a a a a a a4 a a a > a p x a x a Ix z x a a a x a z o x x=) x z o x a x a m x x x x m cn a a a a a a a a a a a a a cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn w w U W M M v O O M m M OD Ln r H p a' r-i ri r-i r-i r-I ri r-I ri ri ri ri r-I r-i lO lO O m m M M lO ri M M N N N M V v' O w r--i r-I r1 ri rH ri r� r1 r-I r-i ri rH —1 lD Ln r Ln Ln m m Ln m M M ri r-I ri Ln M O > 1 > CQ I I I I I I I I i I I I i r-I M N O O Ln 0 M m m m O m m m O m z z x rH r 4 ri r-i ri .--1 rH r1 r-i ri ri ri ri M m M Ql m m m O M Ln Ln m m m l0 r Ol H p H Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O LD 1.0 m r r r r m m r r r r r m m ri H z O O O O O O O O O O O O O � v IT Qr v 1�7 IT v v' v v v v' v v IT v' p N N N N N N N N N N N N N r-I H H rH ri rH r-1 r-I ri rH ri r-i ri ri ri ri r-1 � z a w w ara a I O O w H OG N N N O O O O O O N N O O O O O O O O O O O r1 O O r ri O O O W M m M O O O O O O m m O O O O O O O O O O O rH O O Q' ri O O O Ln Ln Ln O O O O O O Ln Ln O O O O O O O O O O O m O O m m O O O Q Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln v Ln Ln Ln Ln (Y) ri ri r-I r-I ri ri M r-1 rH M r1 ri M M ri ri ri z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O �� o 0)r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r H z Ln l0 M N M Ln lD m N M r Ln N r-1 .--1 ri r1 H r-i v' r-1 r-i N ri rj M N ri ri r--1 O r1 ri M m r r r m m M ri O Ln Ln Lf) O 0 Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O Ln Ln Ln O Ln Ln Ln OU r r lO l0 lO l0 l0 l0 lD W r r v N N N M M v' a v v' Ln v v' v Ln ri ri ri U ri ri ri r-i r-1 r-I r-i r-1 ri ri ri 1-1 r-i r1 r 1 H r1 ri ri ri ri ri N r-i r-I ri N ri r-4 r-I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O IT ri ri ri r-I r-I r 4 —1 ri ri r A Ln ri ri r--1 Ln ri r-I r-I z Q U U U U U U U U u U U U U aa4 z z z z z z z z z z z z z H H H H H H H H H H H H H H M O U U U U U U u U U U U U U Q O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U u U W Ln m m m m to m w w m m m m w z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z a m w m w m m m m w m m m m H H H H H H H H H H H H H F-1 H H U Ei EH Ei Ei EH E-4 P E-1 Ei E+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O FC a a a a a a a a a a4 a s at a as a a W H z z z z z z z z z z z z z W W W W W W w W W W W W W W W W W a z O O O O O O O O O O O O O C] p p Q q O p q p p q q p q q p p CQ H Cn Cn C7 U] U) (n Cn f/) Ui (n Cn Vl Cn >-4 a w w w w w w w w w w w w w U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U aLi. Fi " H 1-4 " F-i H . H Fi F-i " H I-i " " H Q O U U U U U U U U U U U U U LU Lu 1-4 Cu IS4 fi, Cr t 114 1-4 Cu 44 44 44 Cr t LW 14 C14 q Fi H " H 1-i " H hi H H H 1-i H 114 C 4 r34 E14 Cu U4 44 jsi (y 1" 44 [y 1" [cd [y [y E-4 z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O H 124 W z O > rH ri ra ri r-I ri ri rH ri ri rH ri Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln r M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O >+ ri ri r-i r-1 ri rH r-I r-i ri r-a rH ri ri O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U H U U U U U U U U U U U U U f:a Ga E 4 r" 44 Lc4 Cu E" G4 44 44 44 EX4 44 G.L 44 [u U I --I H " Fi H H H H H H h-4 H H H 44 44 E" [y 44 1" Gci E" 1" W 44 [xa [ri [s1 E" EW E" < U z z z z z z z z z z z z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Y 019 Z OD m O H N M 'cP Ln lO r w m N M O H N M Q M M C �P �0 lO lO lD lO tO lO lD l0 C C r r r r a o H Z N O 01 N Ln \ � x '-1 U N N N N m m m m a) m m 0) m N N 0) m ON m O W H N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 'A ri ri r-1 ri 1-4 r-1 r-1 ri 4 ri r-1 .--i 1-1 .--1 ri r-4 ri 1-4 w a H Hp H HP H H H H H H H H H H H H H •• Ln M c O O M O m r M N m Ln '-1 O O OD r M H C Ln Ln O O ao r-1 Ln 0 4r Lf ) OD m N O O Ol ' 1 Z H W Z O r lO l0 co I M .--1 10 N r V' O M O O; r a O M N r-1 N V N N -1 N r a> OD lO c M }1 O r-I M r-1 Ln N v '-1 In r-1 to a r1 N Ln Ln r N lD O OD l0 C' O Ln OD ' 1 O m c CD O O H H H r cr Ln M rn r z 0 m Z Z Z c, N cn %D c c Z '-1 H '-1 cr W W W r-1 Ln ►a r r r-1 O a E E Q '-1 N cn 3 tWn cwn � W W cn a a a ❑ 44 �m a a m m oa ao w ago m w w w w x E z z z zl: x cn U) w h a a a x .4 z 4 H H H 1--1 1-1 F-1 1-A H a a z a U U a a \ < O Q U o w< W w w W w w w w< < w Q > > < Q U z E-H a H a< H H a a a a a a a a H H U H cn v) H H > O O EH O a a4 0 O O H O O O cn W H H Z H \\\ H x x x x x x x x H H �-1 H Z Z H H U H O U U U cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn 00 a H a a L) a > > > a <<<0:4<<< 4 a cn a W CO a H V-1 a (n a 4 O H O O Cn v7 m O U U U U U U U U O W O a cn O H H O W O U > a ❑ a ❑ ❑ H❑ O W❑ U U❑ H❑ H z H U cn z w z W z . z H z H z W >-4>4�- H H H >• E-+ >��->4>4 H H H H z a W a z W a W z H z w w a w s z w .4 a z z W � w > H> E E x> H H H H H E-+ H H> a> > cn > cn cn > a> U ❑ z ❑ ❑ ❑ w W W W w w W W a z O z z ❑ W cn a� a FC rC a a a a a a a a co W CQ F-I H cn [-+ w w H ❑ a O OD O W Ln O O rn > I > x 01 r l0 N L.O O IT N z z x OD M LO Q' L(i IT IT M ri r1 O H ❑ H O m 01 m m O M fn O O N 1-4 H z O O O O N 1-1 r-1 -4 r-1 O ri ❑ H Y, r 1 H r 1 r 1 N O O Ln Ln ri M a Z a r� w W a I O O 4+ H a M o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r 0 0 O O O o w m o 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 o c a r-i o 0 0 O o Lr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m DD OD 0 0 0 0 0 O m r r r r r r1 r-1 M ri M M M M r m m M ON Z O lO lO lD (M M N O O O O O O O c O O O O w N N N tO lO W r r r r r r r lO l0 L.O r lO H z M O O O r-I N N N N ri r M (`•) r-1 l0 N N co p Ln 0 O O 0 O O 0 0 Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln -1 o OD O M O O O '� r1 N N N N M C C r1 rI lO r N lO U 1-4 Ln O Ln ' r 1 r-1 .--I H r-1 r-1 1- r 1 '-1 r 1 r-1 r-1 r 1 r 1 Q O r1 N N 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O -4 r r r 1-4 1-1 '-1 ri 1--1 ,-1 ri r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 V' Q' CT ❑ ❑ z z H H a W w U U M H W W H H O z U U > > O CDW U Ln U x x x x x x x x �4 pp-1 W W a >+ >+ �H cn cn cn cn cn cn cn a a cn cn < W W W W C7 a a a u U u u U u u U 0 U a s W (n z z U W H r❑� r❑� r❑� O O t-1 z U)fx W W fz W f� OQ H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H ❑ `NG H z H Z H a H U H E W W W W W W W w U H H [n cn .7 W La W a a a a a a a a H a s cn co cn > a z \\\\\\\\ a a s W w x < a z z z z x x x x x x x x w w a a < O H w w w cn cn cn cn cn m cn cn H w w 00 `� z o 00 0 0 v v v v v v v v cn H 44 W a H H w w z O > 0 0 0 0 Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Lrn Ln o o O Ln Ln o D O N N N O O O O O O O O O N N O O Ln 0>4 -4 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '-1 O O O O O U H H W W W H H H H H H H H H H H O O �l U H a 3 3 3 w w w w w w w w w a s a s �C Q U O 0 0 0 a a a a a a a a a a a, a s rZ 0 z H H a U) Z O U w m a 0 O ri 034 w a 020 z Cr ul d �� r- m lD t- m 1` 01 I- O m H m N m M m v m 1n m 1,0 m t` m m m M m O m z O H z N O rn N lD -1 U a) N N N N N M M a1 M a> 01 al al a> O> Ql 01 a1 Ol 0� 0 W H N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r-1 r-I r-1 ri ri 4 -1 ri 1-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 .--1 ri r-I r-1 r-i r-1 r-1 r♦ '-a E FC x F F H H H H H H H H H H F H H H H F F F H H a a r-q r� rn o 0 0 I'D �D m m 1n a, o 0 o m 1- 0 1n 1n o o o o M F O O O c 1.0 Ln an al O u7 Ln O N M Ln N r- Lr) \O O O W z M O ri O lD m N m N a; a1 O t` 10 m 01 in 1D al O O x n C' m (`') rr t` -1 (`') O C' a) m O N M .-1 ul r-1 to m 1n 1n >+ O (Y) 1n r-4 M M Lr) N r-1 l0 N l0 m C' m a' -1 -1 r-1 < 2: r 1 N 1n a a>r �D o o M rn o N O 0 110 O 0 O O r-1 O z ra N Ql z z W z m a) a a Q r-1 'cY' O> H H x O Ol Lf) H H 01� U U U W U M H F O 0 > z a z z u w w W O w o o 0 o a m w w U x lx+ 0 0 0 z 44 F < rt; z >+ >+ a ry U) a U U a O cn U) H O O 2: cn co W z a W 1 \ \ Z H H 3 3 3 3 H H H h O >+ >+ cn x r-1 w w Z cn cn O O O O (nu) \ U a H H a < a < H D P H H H a 1--1 H a O O a Q a O a >+ a z > H < H H O D U> U N H a E-1 < Q H a cn .7 U) to Q Q O cn O H O O \\\\\ O O 1- 1-+ O x x x x tz z z UP a U PPPHPZ F a s H a < Cz a a 0 0 0 0 0 o a MIX x x a < W W U U U U w U U O H U O (DO O OCCOMEO O O O O O\\\\ W H H > z H 0 z 0 to O �a 0 n O U U 0 rt cn cn F H F H h z H U cn z x z w H x Z w z << Q z O z z \ cn cn w W W W\ 0 0 w U> a> w H a> W a H a H s H H a H H W > H W > << x x> W x H W to W to (D 0 C7 0 Q 0 Q O x F Z O Z O O W < O x x x x x 0 0 u) co m m m O n D O m U U U) W w H a U w w w w w m U 00 c �C Ft fSl m W a W W w H O a m o N (Y) lM O O O O O O O O O 0 O W Ol O M O O O O O O O O O O O O I z � N N N N N N N N N N N N z O N Ln� H [] H 2:) r-1 > I M (`') U U U U U U u U U U H z r-1 O -4 N N w W W W w w w w W W O H ,Y, (Y) z O tD t0 O O O 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 < z a rl; w w m a 1 0 O w F x o 0 o m 1n u-) to m r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 w o 0 0 t` r r r r m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O U') 0 0 Ln Ln 1n un 1n Ln o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ol Qt M m m m m m Ol z o O O O O O O O O O M M O O O O O O O O O O H lD l0 r- lD W w lD lD w 1- w w l0 w l0 w w �0 lD lD w lD z m r 1 .--1 r-4 1-4 1-4 r-1 ri -1 r-1 M Qx W (M lD N ry) 1n lD lD N 1n m in O O O O O O O 1n 1n 1n O O O O O O O O O O O lD M N M M M M M M r 1 v v M m m O) M a\ M M M M U U H r-1 -4 -4 1-4 r-1 r-f ,-1 .--1 r-1 -A r-1 lD u-) l0 u7 u) lD w l0 In l0 < o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cT c o� 0 c c o 0 C' '-i r-1 r-i ri ri ri r-I ri e--I r-1 ri N N N QT CV CI' N a >x 0 0 a w o 0 0 0 0 o w w O 0 H F-1 H " H F-i a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a F F a a a a a a a a a a F O z z z z z z z z 0 0 a O O a O O 0 O z U H H H H H H O O O O O O O O O O O O o a w w w w w w U U Ix x >x a a x a x a tx 1,) � O 1 Gu [u Ga Cw w Gu W W O IZ >I H H H H H H z (7 0 Ljr) O F a z a a 0z z W W W W W W W W W W W W W a C� H z w w w w w w m a s U U u U U u U U U U < z H M a s < < < < < < < Q < < H 0 O !n to to ca cn O O > > > > > > > > > > 1 F 0 U a U U w w w w w w w w w w Q a >+ >+ >+ >• a a a a a a a a a a W F O W F F H F F F W H F m m m m m m to m m m a z z z z z z z O cn cn CO H z H H n 0 m 0 0 0 H z a 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 < o O z cf) 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >+ O+ U U z U U U U U U fZ x x z z z z z z z z z z < a w w x x w w w w w w w w w w a FC O cs > > > > > > > > > U U U m cn cn U m cn U U cn a In H H 1- A H H -A H " H 00 H w z w a a a x x a a a a x a a a a a a a a a a z 0 > o o ON ,-1 1n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N m O Co O O O O N O O -1 r-1 f-1 H r-1 ri r-i r-1 r-1 r-1 O >1 -1 O o -1 -4 r-1 .-i -4 rA M ri r-1 O O O O O O O O O O U F Gu > > > > > > > > > U U to cn to m w to cn cn to to U" CQ H H H H H H H H H 00 O O O O O O O O O O < U a a Cx x rz x z ac a a z a a a a cx a a a a a a 03o 021 z 1-4 N M c' Ln l0 r 0D Cal O N M O —4 N Ln -,O r OD '-T M a) a) m m m m m m m O O O O 1n 1n 1n O O O O O 1n (z Q ri r--i H z N O 01 N r r-4 u m 0) m 0\ m 0) 0) 0) 01 ON O\ Ol N N N m Ol 0) Q1 O\ N O w H N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N < rH r-i IH r-4 r1 r1 r-1 ri 4 1-4 r-1 r1 1-1 r-1 ri 1-4 r-A r-1 1-1 IH r-1 r-i Q co H H F-1 E 4 EE+ H F H H E-F H H H F F F H F F H H H a a ri r-1 •• .--1 r-d l0 r O O O O O O O O O r-1 O 4 r-4 N a' M 1n M H r r m m O O c Ln Ln u) O In O N 1n m r N LO N Ln r z H w z O O N 1 1n In O N r O c 00 x O r r 0� M r r N M N r 1n N O r .--i OD M N r l0 N O >4 O C' V' N l0 r-r —1 co OD to in O 1In to —1 1-4 ri r-1 1n N (N 0\ 0) N M r-1 C' M -1 M a r-1 O 0 o ri 0 1-4 qT v In O N 1n 110 1n Q E E H cv OD m m am cn O tD t0 aD er cz >> x N r O r r1 r N 0 0 O O LO cn cn cn �.o Lf) 1n r1 O O (z w H H N a a a a O M w w£ z 0 `n o a o F-1 H W a x x x x z z z z 0 0 0 0 QO QO o QQ cn H H O O O O x x x x H cn cn H H a x u z .a .a w a .a a a n 0 0 a as z Q Q a x a z< z Q Q < � 2 z OOZZ H H H WWWWP Hp H E-H H H U O x x 1-+ H 0 0 M H O 3 3$ 3 0 W O O O O .40 > W H x x z z n rt H w w w W H < E-1 F H H W H cn cn H H Q w w w w Ul U U z H a H H < cn cn x rz a a a cn a > a cn cn cn cn cn CG C34 w z O" z z 3 3 0 0 U O o 0 0 0 w 0 w 0 cn O W w w w w 0 O W > Z O O Q Q C] U o M H H H H H 4 Q p z U o 0 cn cn x x w z x z x x z z z a z a z a 4 .a a .a z w z o 1-+ U) a a w w H w I I I I w < w a W w w a a a a a W cn w a w 14 14 3 3 z 3> 3 3 3 3> z> a> u> a a a a a> w> x C] rt H H W w W W 0 0 0 0 H a < x o o D o H O n W w a a x x z z a z a a a .a F-4 cn a cn cn cn cn U U W rH r4 rH r-I r4 rq r-1 rl 01 O H C] a o 0 0 0 0 o O Cl 0 0 O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m m m 1:7 O > I > W N N N (N (N N N N O1 0) 0) 0) M 1n m 0) l0 l0 l0 ri N z z x 01 0) 0) M m 1n N Ln 1n m 0) 0) 1n r i H H U U U U U U U U Ol 0) m 0) 00 DD < l0 M R' C' Q, N 1 H Z W W W W W W W W O O O O O N r OD O O O ifl O C] Li O 0 O O W 0 N N (N N r 1 r 0 0\ Uf) l0 t0 l0 LO O H .Y. FC z a r.� w a w a I o O w H x o O O Cl O o 0 o O O o 0 o rn 0 O 0 0 1r) o r, w O O o O o o O o 0 0 0 0 o r 1 110 0 0 o r-1 o v o pq O o O o o O o O O o O o 0 0 o O o m o kD E O M m m M m M M M O O O O M M In M M M M M Ol 0) z O O O O O O O O r r r r Ln O M O O O O O O l0 l0 �0 lD l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 I'0 l0 l0 OD r l0 r r r r r lD l0 H z M l0 Ln l0 M l0 M N M M M M r T) M N N r M r-1 r 1 N O O O O O O O O O O O O O un Ln 1n O O to Ln to O O O 0) m m m m a) m 0) 01 d> m 01 M M r1 N N M M N 1n 1n U In l0 110 k0 1n l0 1n u-) Ln Ln Ln Ln r-i r-1 ri r1 r-1 r 1 r I r i r i N Q c' aT O -V CT C C O C C C O O O O O O O O O 0 N N Q' N N N N C' N N N N ri r-1 ri r 1 r 1 r-1 r-1 Un In U a a a a a a a a � z a a a a a a a a w H M C7 C� C� C7 C7 C7 C� C� C7 U M o x x x x x x x x w H a 1n w w w W W w w w Q a+ U U U U U U U U H w a 3 < < < < < < < < < w a a a a .a O E+ >>>>>>>> z w Q Q a a a o w 1 w w w w w w w w w a fz z H 44 z z z z z z z rC a a a a a a a a W W W W m H H H H F-i H U W H cn w to w 0 to M M H H H H < .4 C14 Gu Cu Gu 44 H W" 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 30 O O O U CL w w w w w OU W < x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cz CY. a s O W a O 3 >+ OI z z z z z z z z U h4 W H H H H H cn x < cz w w w W w w W w O O O O E a H 0s a a a 0s F+ a' a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o x E x x o U) z rz a x w x x a X w a a z cn cn cn cn m cn to m E, cn H r-4 W z 0 > o O o O O o 0 O o 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 O O 0 r M r-1 r-i r-1 —4 1-4 r-1 14 O 0 O O r-1 a' o 1-1 r-, —4 1-4 r-i r-1 O O y+ O O O O O O O O H —1 r ra O O N O O O O O O O U H O O O O O O O O O O O O x � A4 <x O O < U a z a z a a a z Ix a z w U) cn cn cn cn w cn cn cn cn 022 Z c' 1n l0 I- m m O r1 N M V Ln Ol I'O OD O1 O -.q M O r1 N N Q Ln Ul to O . -I -i H r-i � -4 r1 un lO l0 N N N �0 a O r4 r1 r1 r1 r1 r1 H Z N O rn (N O � r+ x 1--4 U N N N N N m m m m m 0) m N 0') 01 N N N 0) m m 0) N O w H N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r1 r-1 r-1 r-1 ri e--1 -I r1 r1 r1 -4 H r-1 r-I ri r-i ri r1 r-1 -1 ri r-1 r1 Oo E-+ HP H H H H HP H H H H H H H H H H H H H H a s r1 ri •• Ln r` O O 0 110 Ln O Ln O Ln Ln O N OD M I- c O M N O O M H N M Ln O 0 r-i r- O N Lr) r` N O r1 r- l0 N an Lr) al m O O Z H E4 Z 11 M r� O to L1 M Lf l0 N M l0 O l0 cP N O1 to OD 2: O C' 'T O (Y) N 0 Ln 01 O1 CO CD 0') M OD \0 l0 r^ OD O M N 07 >+ O N O M -zT 00 -zr CT N O un q::r C rl) N r♦ t.0 Q U-) N r1 N C 0 OD ri a r4 M O N OD Q1 0 1n 0 4 I- r` O C0 0 o a On Ln U lO M OD l0 M N H OD 1n C' M l0 04 r- 0 U OD r-4 r1 H a a N z w H 0 E > U I E W U O > H U) H H a a .7 H a U) .a 0 ,4 U) z H Z z rC > W N FC Z 1-1 h U U U O U U ( H 1 1 E'+ H a O O>> w 0 > > > rr > r> O O O U O rn O U O O W H a M rn h O U) U) U) U) H H H E-+ rn V) H > H a U H a O N Cy z W a U) H H a w a a a a a a w a w a a a a Z (D o U a a z O H w w w U w U 0 (D O O � O H > a < Z H H 3 H H H< H< n z M Z o z o U) U >+ M z � O U Z U a H O O W O O O O a O a Z H Z (D Z 0 Z m H H U) U) Z H Z H U) �l a a a o a a a a W H W H W H W a Z a W Z z W H W H w w m x x m z x x x m x w> w> U) > U) > O 0 a Lu 0 0> U) > v) o w< O O Q H O O O w O w W W W H H<< H H W W rn rn rn m rn rn m H a [4 G U G] 0 0 M W0 H O H o a M L -1 O O N W H M MqZr � M O W O N r1 M r-1 r1 W W r1 -1 M M v C In qT M 0 > 1 > W N O N d N r1 O O O O O O r1 M r1 N N OD M OD o Z z x ri r--i r1 ri -i r-1 r1 r1 r1 r1 r1 r-i w OD N N to to to Q1 1 H o H O I I I O I I I 1 I I I 1 0 r1 m N N C C' ;T v �O H ,'Z.., -4 N r1 O H N N N N N N N r1 r-a rl) -rr -zr -�r Vr V' Ln �O C] x 0 0 0 N O O O O O O O O r-1 r1 m m m m m m M 0 FC z a � w an ro a 1 O O w H a W O r 4 r1 O 0 r1 r 4 tO r1 W O O N m m 1-1 m m O f` W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M M M M N m m O rM w O l0 W O 0 W W w w w w O 0 Ln m OD OD N OD OJ o 1p O m Lr) 0) m a-) 1n m m o) Ol m m 1- in 1n M M M M M M 01 01 z O Ln O O Ln o O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O O O H w W W DD m w w"D%D"0 w w �O W r r- r r 1` r` �D Z N N N N N N N N N N N N r-1 N 0) M M M M M M w 1- D O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M in 11n 1n to 1n in 1n 1n O to 1n Ln uf) Ln tf) Ln Ln Ln to Ln Ln N w CT c �r c v c l0 M U U N N N N N N N N N N N N r 1 r i r-i r 1 r-1 ri r 1 r i ri r1 r 1 O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O In Lr) Ln Lr) Ln 11n In un lf) Lr) to u ) r1 vT c r-i -1 r-1 4 r1 r1 cH U U U U U U U U U U U U U U) z z z z z z z z z z z z Z < a0 H H H H H H H H H H H H U U U U U U U >+ U z z z z z z z w M U) Ui Ui Ui Vi U) U) U) U) U U) U) a Z H H H H H H H o x x x aG x x x x x x x w U) U) U) U) U) U) U) D O a a a a a a a a a a a a a a W w w w W w w U) Lr) O O O O O O O O O O O O U D H Monona U a 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 O r.0 < < < < Kc o z FC H H H H H H H E-+ H H H H ? a H U U U U U U Z H W W W W W w w w w W w w E-+ C7 U H H H H H H z z z z z z z z z z z z H O a a a a a a a z Q U w rn a a a a a (y w W H H H H H H H F, H H H H H r-1 U) < a z cn cn rn cn cn rn cn cn cn cn cn Gu E+ OCQ - FC � 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 a H z z z z z z H Z >� Ol x x x x x x x x x x x x a U) o U) >4 < a H H H H H H H H H H H H U M M rn M M rn a a' a O =) �:) D D n D n�:) D�:) D:D 3 x as a, as as a a, H a a o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a a z H H H H H H H H H H 124 w z 0 > r r r` r r r r r r r r� r- M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .7 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 O O 0 O r 4 r-1 r1 r1 ,-1 r-1 r1 O r1 O >+ O O O O O O O O O O O O N Cl O O O O O O O ra 0 U H a a D 0:D D 0 D D n:D M n W o a a a a a a H D U H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O E+ x 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a < U u) v) co U) V) U) rn U) U) V) V) V) to to E-H H H H H H H H H �t3 023 z a D: O M N H C• N .-+ M V' 1n 1n N 1-4 CC) lD lD N 1-1 m lD O r r--I r r N m N m N O M N F z O m N 0) " ,- .-1 O W x U H m N '"1 N 4 N N .-i N N .--I N N r-I N N -1 N N m N N N r-1 m CV H N N 4 N N N N .-1 M N M N M N m N a a al H H H Fl F F F H F H H F H F F F H • M H z W H z O O c r CO r 1n "T o0 O O 1n M r O O O O O O .--1 N .-+ c Ql r r r-1 O r1 m M v' lD M Ln O CV r m 1 v' 0) N N 0) c O O O E ?� a o 0 r O m N O c• c O Ol .--1 1-4 .--1 c N 0 O r 00 1n C M C o O O O N 'i M C CV lD W r M M r r C O C O O m .--1 r1 O N M Q1 U z 4c r1 F U) U > co a • < H 0 0 a I N m 1 r rn a a x w a a U < > a < U) a rC a rC a < z O a O H O z O H O < E-1 O Z W E-1 O E1 U) O H O a < H O E+ O H 0 W U I-1 H a: H H a F U) w U) w F H a F F d4 U F F z H H F H O a H z O a O co U) (4 O w Cu W 1" a O O U a 0 U a w O x Z 0 w cz a O co W U) W a O W w co w cn W U) w U) w U) w a 0 > z a U U 0 z w a C.) z z z 0 z cZ 0 z > co 0 z z O z a a z a a a a a a z z (D H U) W F U) W > W a> w H E H E> w O a> W H> W z <> W W 0> w a a a a> w a a a a a a a a a a a a> w H U) W w 0 w °• H 3 0 0 �C 0 U w > a a H > 0 U) p cn 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 cn o m W 0 H C) 0 a; w M o O r lD O 1n o I'D O 0 lD r 1n 1n m c r o > I z > z m E p O 1 lD M (D O o O cn O O U) O 0) w r N N U m q:ll r1 m �T 4 CO v o O v o r -r O O 1n o 4 1n 0 m -�r o lD Ln r H C] H JG z %D 0 o M E+ U(-) F cu o lD W co 00 o o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 O m Q z a < w ao a 1 0 0 w F a r o 0 O o O O O c IT r v o O 0 o 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O o O N m ai lD lD O o O 1n Ln O O O O O O O O O 1n O z O Ln M r lD r lD M O Ln O O M O M O M O r1 O M O M O r 1 O . i o M O LO O E-1 Z O lD N O N l0 M un r 1 N O o 0 N O 0 0 r N 0 lD M 1fn M lD 1n M r O N r N o N r N O N r N O N r N O N r N O N r r-1 1n .--1 r r-1 1n r-i r N O N l0 1n . I r U U a -4 O 1-4 O .-+ O M r 1n M r -4 O -4 O r-1 O 1-4 O r-1 O r-1 O .-1 CDOOOOO H r1 ,-, .--i .--1 r-1 O U O U) U 0 (n a Q U U) Q U) < U Gu U z H z z O U a z s z O 0 H a U Ui H << H h-i F-1 H . H 1- i 1--I Ln a �C U z H z H F U) H U) co (n < U a < D 3 W a 3 W [ z O z 0 g z O z O z a z 0 a W W 1 H z a O D z F n Ix H w < x 0 x U p U) U) E O U E O U O U O U E O U E O U z H w a z ao H a O z H F z d4 z m x z 0 O O W4 z Q w W a a0 W Q O I- U O I- U E-1 a H a F z F a H a F a z W >�+ OOI >+ co O 0 U) U) z W a< a 0 H (n U) x a z o z z a a a a a a a U) H 44 z w E-4 H 0 > > > >> 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 z 0 O > 0 r-1 0 O 0 Ln 0 1n 0 O 1n 0 1n r o 1n 0 -I 0 r, 0 0 0 0 0 0 -I O to 0 >+ U H U " O 0 a' ,-1 H H 0 CO co 0 CQ co .-1 x M 0 a Q 0 z < 0 0 F 1 0 z O 0 z O r-1 O a < .-4 o a �C 1 0 a < .-1 0 a �C 4 0 a Q Co a < 0 z /1 /'ti Q {`li > > >> 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 `(J 024 N. M C .4 Ln N m z r r r M r M (M O r-1 . i IH H z N O 01 N O \ N x U N N N 0) N m O� O w N N N N N N N r-I e-1 ri .--4 -1 4 ri 1: Q fTl H H H H E+ H E-H a a 1-1 rn 0 cw lD o 0 0 0 M H O O M O O O r z H W z ,-i ern o O N 0 M N 00 -4 0D (Y) �+ O 110 c to c a m 0 rn o v o o Ln O 00 O am 0 0 lD N O Ln m 00 !� v l0 C O N v H N .4 V N 0 H H z W H z H U CQ+ W W E�+ H H E-4 (n H a O O 0 > O U) a) 0 z z 0 0 W H H E-H u) H << H H H H x H U+ CL4 a U) a F+ a a a a a W a O H 0 w 0 w 0 0 0 x 0 > a 0 0 0 z 0 a a 0 a a 0 U 0 z H U Cn z W 0 U z W a W z w W H W H z W W H W H z W z z W > > > la4 a4 > a4 04 > > 0 < z 0 0 0 0 P4 U) U H U U U U a4 0 W lr4 H U W lD M 00 v, M a i -1 0 a 01 00 r lD (`') m a4 O W CO N 01 V OJ 00 N > I > pq M c r r r r W z z x 0 in M v N N M W H 0 H 0 O r l0 110 lD lD I H z O N OD m 00 00 rH Q 0 F-, x 00 00 O O O O O H z w r� as w w a 0 o w H a 0 w O O 0 0 0 o c O lD lD w lD l0 Ln 0 am m rn m am Ln z o 0 0 0 0 0 l0 lD l0 lD lD lD l0 H z 1-4 N (n M M M a O O O Ln U') In u1 Lr) 0 U N Ln 1-1 -4 -1 ri M U r+ N 1-4 r� O 0 0 0 0 0 0 u-) r-I r-4 W U H > a w M O 0 0 0 O O z Ln H H H F-1 H � H Q aH FC W a a fY W 0 0 0 o z w H 04 a s a s � H °a 0 0 0 o o`qo o w a a w o P 0 0 0 0 z a O 0 W w w w w O cn H fs, z W 3 3 X X X X >+ z 0 > o 0 0 o N N o O N O ri -4 -4 4 o O O .-a O O O 0 i U H W O W W W W 0 + 03 025 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 3:10PM 01/24/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 48060 01/24/02 BIA013 BIA - DESERT CHAPTER 125.00 48061 01/24/02 COA080 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 8286.28 48062 01/24/02 DES051 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHL 410.00 48063 01/24/02 IMP010 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 6581.92 48064 01/24/02 REY050 ELAINE REYNOLDS 50.00 48065 01/24/02 SUS100 ERV SUSSMAN 192.03 48066 01/24/02 VER200 VERIZON 637.31 CHECK TOTAL 16,282.54 026 z .--1 N M C' U') lfl r- 00 m O .-i N M c' L lfl r w m O -4 N N a O F z N O v N \ � x .� U 0 CD 0 U C7 C7 U CD U CD U C7 C7 U CD U C7 0 C7 U CDW F E E E E E E E E E XME E E E E E C� < W W W W W W w W W W W W W W w W W W W W W a s F F F F F H F H F F E-F F F F H F H F H H F 00 O O O O O M 'ZI' O 1.0 M lD O a) OD Ln O M v V v U') N F O O O O Ol U-) (M Lr) M v' H O O mot' r) O O O O O �D z F W z O Q) O Lr r` N O 00 0l v O N l0 l0 lD rl E a U-) N N N M 1:7 . -1 O m --i r- .-i nM c• M Lr) m I` I` I` U-) >+ O r-1 N -tr M c 00 110 1-4 < I- v H Q, O 00 O N O M O N O 01 O O t!) lD O N N 00 r1 00 C7 Ln rn r-1 N c' Ln z —4 00 F O U z F H WE- UUUP F F Cf) E-H O O O co O > > > O a 0 ❑ o W i-+ F F O F+ MMMP < F a H � w >>>>>>> z z z z a a >� a U U U a a s u a >>>> O �-1 O O O O O cn cn to O H O O O O v) > a w w w w❑ ❑ H❑ a a a❑ a❑ w❑ W W W W W W H 0 rzi cU U U U U W w W W U U U W F W W z z z z W z z z z > F F F H F F F > U > W W W > l > H > O O O O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ < < < < < < < < a a a ❑ a x x x x cn a a a a 3 3 a 3 3 3 3 44 w w w U oa w Q4 a, w W r-4 U w hl ❑ O > I > W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O O O N z z E H 1--4 F-1 H H H F-1 O H F--q FH C1 Cl Ol M H ❑ H M a a a a a a a I a a a U C' -cr 4 F-+ z FC FC < < < < N FC < < w to l0 lD r ❑ > > > > > > > O > > > ❑ un Ln Ln I` x FC z a < ao w ao a I o O r4 H a O O O O O N M Ln N N Ln O 0) N U') O O O O O O W O O O O O m l0 l0 M M \0 O 1-1 M 110 O O O O O O fI1 O O O O O l0 l0 l0 l0 110 lD O lD l0 l0 O O O O O O E H r-1 H H -i rH I` r- Ol M u) Ln Lo N z M M M M m M M M M M M N N N O O M M M M lD lD lD lD lD l0 lD lD lD lD lD lD lD l0 lD L l0 lD lD lD F z N H H N M T M -i N m M M M O O T) to Ln a) a) Ln Lr) Ln ul Ln Ln Lr) Lr) Lf) Ln O Lr) Ln LO if) O H M W c v MT C• CP c N C IT cc N N r 1 .--1 -1 -4 U FC o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 o O o 0 0 0 1 H r1 H H H H ,-i rl r1 H a x F F F U (!) to to a a a a a a a co H H H WWWWW ❑❑❑ a a a x H H ❑ w w w w FC FC w z z z F F F F 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1+ O O O O Qa w as w w H H H O < < < < >+ >+ >+ >+ >4 �H H H H F U) x x x x W w W w W W w z 2 FC Q cn Qw U U U U a a a a a a a ❑ c� ❑ I a a a a >>>>>>> ❑ a a a z z H H H w F v) cn C/l to Q Q Q w a z w w w w .a a a a a a a U) a a a a U) M H ❑❑❑❑ a a a a a a a U) z z z z < a W W W W W W W F H H H W O O O O O >+ OI I I I I x x x x x x x a a a a z FC a U U U U U U U W W W W H H H H H Q+ < Q FC F>r FC FC FC FC FC FC FC FC U) Q, Qa Q > a a a a a ❑ H H H H O O O O O O O w E E E a a w w w w z CA W W CO U U U U U U U ❑ H H H W ri] > > > > F Cti W z O > M m M m O O O O O O O O O O O O O (D Cl O O 1-1 1-4 .-1 00 O N 00 00 00 00 Ln H 1-I r-1 Uf) O O O O O O >+ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O H (N N N N U H FC FC F>+ F>", < < < < < Q Q C/) Q1 da 0+ >+ Cn 0: a a a U H H H H H O O O O O O O W ZEE W O w w W w > > > 041 027 Z N M V' U-) I'D r N N N N N N O E• z N O c N \ N x O W E+ x < E-H E-+ EH E~ E• E w a 00 In •• O fM O lD OD r N r1 � rn Ln c m z E . W z r In T) r rn r-+ D 01 M N N fM M �+ O a a M r M E w � o W O M x O x x £ W U' W 0 O X 0 x 0 z 0 W H (D F-I z O E• U H U U H M O H H 04 .i .7 a H H cx O U) U) U E P O r a w H << 0 z U W W Ei Cu 0 0 z Hu) z z O G4 H H W Ox W x0 W a a Cn a a Z E+ H H W w U W H (Yi Ql m O O N r O [z7 l0 N O r 0 110 1 > nl O m r-1 N N (D z z x N ri rl) C• ri N H O F-I ,'� -i U-) r-I ri r C' H z r c r r r l0 C] r M r r r to H x z a w ca a 1 O O w E+ x O;r v rn N N W O lD lD .-I M M W O lD w tD lD lD a Ln Ln r r .-i .-i z M M N N M M E z (Y) Ul in t.f) U') Ui Ln O U U r--I r-4 e-I .--i 1 r -4 O O O O O O -1 IH -1 -4 --I _q M O O Ln a I w Ems - a z cn H z z z z z z O O O O O O a a s O a a a a a x a C z E+ w w z 0 > O O O O O O a O O O O O O H z z z z z z U "T Ln N N a Q E� O E E z W i a i ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 48047 01/16/02 ABC100 ABC TV SERVICE 48048 01/16/02 BAN150 BANK OF NEW YORK 48049 01/16/02 CAL128 CA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 48050 01/16/02 ELRO10 EL RANCHITO 48051 01/16/02 GRC100 GRC ELECTRONICS 48052 01/16/02 LAQ050 LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES 48053 01/16/02 PLA050 CHRISTOPHER PLATAMONE 48054 01/16/02 RIV040 RIVERSIDE CNTY DEPT CHILD 48055 01/16/02 SAW050 BETTY SAWYER 48056 01/16/02 SOU007 SOUTHWEST NETWORKS, INC 48057 01/16/02 STUO10 WILLIAM STUBBLEFIELD 48058 01/16/02 UNIO05 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 48059 01/16/02 WEI050 MARK WEISS CHECK TOTAL 2:15PM 01/16/02 PAGE 1 PAYMENT AMOUNT 78.18 1500.00 163.00 262.59 176.00 416.00 378.00 426.50 319.59 20950.68 122.50 164.00 36.00 24,993.04 4 029 z c LO t.0 I` OD H rn N M o H M N H z O o W U U H < C7 E c7 E 0 c9 £ rn rn rn rn rn rn E g rn rn m w w W F F F H H F H H H F F H a 0 N F OD '+ o O o O rn Ln o O 0 O 0 O o Lr) rn Ln OD k0 0 Ln 0 O z w E ?+ H z D O co I` O O LO M l0 N w 10 t- •- A 10 .H cP OD I- l0 N 01 1 O Ln Ol N N c l0 .--� a FL O N OD .-4 O O O O C3) In O O O O O O O u") 0) LI) OD l0 O U1 CO O O Lr) -4 M a W N N lD lD C OD ❑ I- M > H lD N C W > 0 On � M O LO Ol O N N -4 �+ 1-4 z ` Q N 3 o o N H ❑ cn a w U x m H 0 a ❑ W a < a FC a < s < z H a $cc a 04 s a s a a < s < w H a < C) w a < a < z z 0 F 0 F 0 W >+ F 0 H w F 0 W a H 0 a 1 H 0 H 0 0 1 H 0 D a H 0 h 0 H 0 E-H 0 D 1 W O H H F a cn w H F w U > H a x < H rz W E F a a O H a s4 F a' W O H F • s4 z +.) H z x O U F C4 W a E+ z a 0 E-H F fZ ►+ 0 > x a o ❑ cn 0 ❑ H o ❑ a H o ❑ H U o ❑ to rI 0 ❑ U D O m ❑ -4 0 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ CD z 0 ❑ U ❑ o ❑ rn z H U cn W x z W z H z W cn W z W U z z w w h z W ❑ z w a F z ❑ W z w z D z w H a z W w H z w ❑ w ❑ > > E ❑ > a > ❑ 0 > 0 C> > a \ > Un z > a \ > w w > as > cn z > a \ W w H FC u] U a a H a a U H a U W H ❑ O > I > a' W a I 3: U OD O m O N N N tD a �f• p H C) 2 D ON in OD I H ❑ H dG z O to O l0 01 N p z a � 04 w co 04 I o 0 w E4 a W co m Ln o O O O O O o O O O O O o O O N 0) in o O O Ln l'M o O O N Q1 LO o O O D z On O l0 I` O l0 Ln m C M l0 O M N m O N a N u) Ln m O Ln N H z •J 0 M Ln r1 Ln O O O f- N O N O O O l0 M L N N O O O .-1 O O O OD N O u) t0 M LO N N O O O U r1 O O r1 O O O rI O O r1 O O N O U-) -+ O r1 O o H w w ❑ ~ x U z a w H N >+ Oa W O U H H a (n ❑ M o 0 a H cn a W H a a 0 vj a w w x H Ha W U H O O+ U a a+ H z H a W L=+ O W H > W 3 z w O 0 H 0 F Q x x W w 3 z H U Q 4 z Chi H FC D U) > EU 0 ❑ R: x U z U W a H z H a O F ❑ H Cn rr+ U) W 3 g ❑ �+ a w r>r a o ❑ F U ao z < O °° Q �d a W a D a Q m a x a > H >• H w x M 0 H a H W z M H CX4 z w FC rn U U a W cn 3 D z 0 D > O Cl O Ln Ou N O -1 O O O in O U') O c O in O O -1 LO O O >4 U E-+ U H FC U 14 U ri z < ao a Q U Cl a w 11 U a C7 O a a O < a a O > F-1 a O 3 U)cn O D 0 O D H U) Cl H z i� ❑ t 030 z N x 0 H z N O \ N x U C7 O W H C7 Q w E FC m E- a a 0 •• o N H O z H w z M M ?+ O a Q O O O O c �o to M u z H H W a w a � E � z H H 0 0 x 0 W H H U H U H z H a Q; M (Z 0 H O a 0 x Q o w > H > n w U) CY W Cu U W H Q a 0 w i > m z z z a < m w m a 0 0 w H tZ N W N m ao M un z O H z M O O O U U r-+ r� o 1-4 O O Lf ) a i U) W E-H U) a z H � � 3 > a a a x a+ FC O rz a o H 44 W z O > o M Ln O >+ o U H H Q U 3 O a E-H O H E-H z W E a H a w m H 043 031 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 48033 01/10/02 DEP008 DEPT OF CONSERVATION 48034 01/10/02 DOU050 DOUBLETREE HOTEL 48035 01/10/02 IMPO10 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 48036 01/10/02 IRWO20 BARBARA IRWIN 48037 01/10/02 LAN007 LAND CONCEPTS INC 48038 01/10/02 LOP050 RAY LOPEZ ASSOCIATES 48039 01/10/02 MIT150 MICHAEL MITCHELL 48040 01/10/02 PUE050 MARIA L PUENTE 48041 01/10/02 SHA050 ARCHIE SHARP 48042 01/10/02 SOU010 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO 48043 01/10/02 SPRO10 SPRINT 48044 01/10/02 VER200 VERIZON 48045 01/10/02 VER210 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTION 48046 01/10/02 WRI050 ROBERT S WRIGHT CHECK TOTAL 2:49PM 01/10/02 PAGE 1 PAYMENT AMOUNT 4989.81 2753.46 978.92 50.00 56788.53 4500.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 210.46 55.86 4085.35 69.00 50.00 74,681.39 z r1 N M C LO U-) l0 cT l0 OD r 00 m . ri -4ri 1 r-I O H z N 0 O .-� U u C7 0 C7 o W H E E E E i E E E x w H H H H H H H H H H a c'M • M N �0 N O M O O O O l0 l0 O N H a' l0 a CY) O In O O O O Q OD O z H . W Z N N 1' OD O Ib O O O O O v LO kD In r In DD o In In 1n r1 Ln �r �+ 0 N N r m r 1n N l0 a In I N 1.0 C M r-I l0 N O M O O O O l0 l0 co v' m O In O O O O cr m 01 M OD o OD o U o o O O In OD H In r z In co o In z In z In '-I Lr) m w r am O r In z O O N Q' z N F-I lD V' O H h-1 r1 H In H H H a a a a a z cWn to cn u a z a a w a a a w a w a W P4 a a < 0:4 Q $:4 a s a x< Qx < < a z H a H U H a E+ F4 H a E-+ a H a E-I H H O 0 a 0 > 0 O O O O O O O O W H H H cn H a H H H H H a H a H a HE-4 H U H U)cn U < U) U < a > O > H a W w W w O o a \ 0 0 I-1 rz O 0 F I a O 0 O U O Cl O U O L] H O x o 1-+ 0 z M H O z 0 U > O 0 cn 0 o cn w w w u w Fi w w w � F4 w � w w w cUn a a x x w z z W I -I H > H > W > cn > z > a > cn > cn > cn > cn > 0 > 0 o £ E 0 a Q Q F-I F-1 H Q x x cn cn cn x w x a a x x x a a W IJ. U W -4 r-I M r-1 \ r-1 '-I r-I co Ol " 0 p; o r o 0 o M M r O O \ O O O r .-4 N > I > W v N l0 N N N N O z z x O N M M x \ \ o U N U U U a' M W �+ z o 0 o w o w w w m OD %10 c� ,-1 r-I Ln o > o r i LO H x Q z a Q w ara a 1 0 O w E+ C4 O N O o O M O Cl O Cl O O O W O r O o O 11n O O O O O O O W O M O O O to o Cl O O O O O ,7 r-I Qt m r 0) Ol 1n Ol Ol 01 Ol In In z yr M M (V O O O O O O N M M N C' r-1 110 ul l0 l0 in to In �O l0 1D H z O O Cl N 1-1 w l0 r1 • i ri N M M O o O O O O U') In O O O O In In O O O O N C w l0 C v N rI rI U F!r O O O O O O O o O O O O O r 4 r-I ri r-I r-1 Q' C' ri r-I r-i ri ri ri H H z z m U 0 0 z w M H F-I O [-a cn <7 o > w H C � > U a FC W W O H z U) U)x H 1-I U)cn x rx H H cn v z a a I z z a 3 a a� H w cz FC �C O O W I-1 OG w+ O Q U z U U a ~ a I4 a z W z m H w w H rC O a a a z z < a O O W 1-I U O W W W H O >+ a a P4 r>r a Q Q F I x z N Q (z H H Oq W W a x r1 x H H H a rtr O a 00 as p 0 a H aG z >+ � v a U a a an x z s a a oH a w z 0 > OD OD O o O r O O O o o O O O O O to r-I N o In In In In -4 1-4 O O >+ 0 0 O O O O O r4 CD O d+F{ Nwa U H CL4 W 4 U 0 0 0 U o co > 033 Z O H • r-1 r-i r-I r-1 r-1 O F Z N O O r-1 r+ N U U U U C7 C7 Co C7 4 W w W W W a s co F F F F F M N Un 00 O O N E 1� lD ri O O W z m Ln r rn o M N M I— lD U-) �+ O M a 4 F, a� Ln o 0 n'1 O O Ln Cn O co z Ln o O V' H F w U) a a w a x a 0 0 > 0 a 0 w H F Un F a F � w >>> a F a u x 0 H cn O W O H 0 z U W W W z a z 0 z " v) z z z w W W E-H W Q = x m z cA a a a H x w w U w Ln -+ H M a OD �10 OD 1— O 0 w M m co o Cl > I > m I` O -4 to N z z 2: IV o m OD hl O H M Q' C• cT In U H z o W O U-) Ln Ln 0 H x a z a 0:4 w w m a 1 O 0 w F x o 0 0 0 0 w o 0 0 0 0 0] o 0 0 0 0 a Ln Ln Ln rn rn z M M M O O F Z m M m N H O Ln u-) Ln O O 0 4 Ln v U U .i N H O O O O O LO z O H F O a 0 M (n O O F N W F a z x FC fZ C� W H FC z 3 G] F H a z m ao H z z z z a 0 0 0 0 a a rC 0 a 0z a a a4 a Q w w W w O [-4 w w > > > > x z 0 > o 0 0 0 0 O>4 CD CD CDN O U > > > > 3 01 M 00 c a a F O F E4 z w a 034 A/P - AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED 1:36PM 01/09/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK BK INVOICE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER ID DATE AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME 41780 DEF 07/11/00 150.00 HIS050 HISPANIC TRAINING TOTAL VOIDED 150.00 INVOICE DESCRIPTION TRANSLATION SVCS 043 035 A/P - AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED 3:13PM O1/24/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK BK INVOICE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER ID DATE AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME 47936 DEF 12/31/01 50.00 REY050 ELAINE REYNOLDS TOTAL VOIDED 50.00 INVOICE DESCRIPTION CULTURAL ARTS COMM MTNG 036 A/P - AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED 4:55PM 01/28/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK BK INVOICE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER ID DATE AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME 48051 DEF 01/16/02 176.00 GRC100 GRC ELECTRONICS TOTAL VOIDED 176.00 INVOICE DESCRIPTION PROJECTOR REPAIRS 037 T 0 0 -litT 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: C OUNC ILIRDA MEETING DATE: February 5, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: o'L ITEM TITLE: Approval of Final Parcel Map 29909, Santa STUDY SESSION: Rosa Plaza, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company PUBLIC HEARING: Approve Final Parcel Map 29909, Santa Rosa Plaza, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company. None. None. Parcel Map 29909 is located east of Eisenhower Drive, south of Calle Norte, west of Washington Street, and north of Calle Tampico. This is a subdivision of a portion of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 6, Township 6 South, Range 7 East, San Bernardino Meridian (Attachment 1). It consists of seven (7) numbered parcels and three (3) lettered parcels, containing 15.246 acres more or less (Attachment 2) . On December 4, 2001, City Council conditionally approved the Final Map, allowing 30 days for completion of its processing. The 30-day time extension for satisfying the requirements of the conditional approval expired on January 3, 2002. As of January 3, 2002, the required securities were not received. The Map is technically complete and the Subdivision Improvement Agreement has been signed (Attachment 3). All required securities have since been submitted and the map is suitable for recording by the County Recorder. All required signatures are on the map except for the City Clerk. Upon City Council approval, the City Clerk will affix the City Seal to the Final Map and offer the Final Map for recording by the County Recorder. C, :5 TAPW D EPT\COU NC I L\2002\020205c. wpd The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve Final Parcel Map 29909, Santa Rosa Plaza, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; or 2. Do not approve Final Parcel Map 29909, Santa Rosa Plaza, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, oy F. Step non, P.E. Interim Public'Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: f Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Parcel Map 3. Subdivision Improvement Agreement � 05 T:\PWDEPT\COU NO L\2002\020205c. wpd • PROJECT SITE • ATTACHMENT 1 NOT TO SCALE 05 tip ATTACHMENT 2 • 0 • V) W S N N V W <� W 3 gw pill J � R 03 7 ~G� a � 6 a $via, p p s WIN MN w i Z c Vic 'O_l, i, I 1 I � o • A W H U e L t .Ilz !d gs q 6g Ix Ill a • O • .- ........ .-.- ....---....... .«-. 'Itzi.-<tl ©.. -.- . O a .r II t � o •�• � 41 STD � . ..S f . / / ON. .'+ G.t RiE� I '��! I g�glM Sga I's all, da•- s R�7 �Rl IIM I� I eiaY O UALM MUM AMWA WTOOOa zCQ e w vi I I o ...Z tX Z U o o off, Ag z I a te\ • CAvst .I 0 0 « z w t>a m Le Ac or cr z m z I n Z. Qos 1.t :ltzAlwi I o MWI la IL �oZ � �r KtdN� � + i 031dllV,L aTtva .... .....__ ... . � - - .. _ ..... _ _.. _ � .... _ .:.. �.. ... - __...._�... ....._ .... . - � � t "iA�. •� a _ �a lM' • I lot z .�\ -a a I N -••+rL .�1tt � a IK'cf i _ N a N .... _._ ........ _ g f a" ��. ._ .. .fir c +_ R +'� 3 Rii N �.... . \S = Y � 7 iLRa ■ W � I z z d (.LSyr ftaC.1 w� y n M1 t Iri 5•� 1 i �NC Itw� fa N 6 C.9 r _ A slam - put x.1 dw IN =lztxe7� ,p.K.Y •SYJN I.K.L�iY 7 AI'ffl • Ar I b13 to 8 'S :sett► a .tz sa a N coot _ 3i bloc r I /• o aN rr. =L o►ttc Ta a 03&WU stru ous'IL /A1 Nti1L •!t -t 'CU ATTACHMENT 3 CITY of LA QUINTA SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT is Parcel Map 29909 THIS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement') is made and entered into this day of , 20 , by and between Santa Rosa Plaza, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, hereinafter referred to as "Subdivider," and the City of La Quinta, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City." RECITALS: A. Subdivider has prepared and filed a final map or parcel map (the "Map') of a unit of land in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, which unit of land is known as Parcel Map No. 29909 (the "Parcel') pursuant to the provisions of Section 66410, et sec. of the California Government Code (the "Subdivision Map Act'). B. Prior to approval of the Map, Subdivider is required to install or agree to install certain public and private improvements (the "Improvements'). C. The Improvements have not been installed and accepted at this time. D. It is therefore necessary that Subdivider and City enter into an agreement for the installation of the Improvements as provided in Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Improvement Plans. Prior to submittal of the Map for approval by the City Council, Subdivider shall fumish original improvement plans meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. • 2. Improvements. Subdivider shall construct the public and private street, drainage, e, utility, landscaping, P P 9 dy and other improvements required to be constructed or agreed to be constructed under this Agreement as listed in Exhibit "A", and shall bear the full cost thereof. The methods, standards, specifications, sequence, and scheduling of construction shall be as approved by the City Engineer. 3. Improvement Security. A. One class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "performance security," shall assure the faithful performance of this Agreement including construction of the Improvements, payment of Subdivider's fair share of Improvements which have been or will be constructed by others ("Participatory Improvementsj, and payment of plan check and permit fees. A second class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "payment security," shall assure the payment of the cost of labor, equipment and materials supplied to construct the Improvements. A third class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as 'Warranty security," shall serve as a guarantee and warranty of the Improvements for a period of one year following the completion and acceptance of the Improvements. Subdivider shall fumish performance and payment security prior to and as a condition of City Council approval of the Map. Subdivider shall provide warranty security after Improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council and prior to or concurrently with the final release of performance security. Warranty security shall not be required for Monumentation or Participatory Improvements. However, the City may utilize Monumentation Security for performance of or payment for the work in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. As part of the obligation secured by each of the performance security, payment security and warranty security, and in addition to the face amount of each such security, each such security shall include and assure the payment of costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing the obligations thereby secured. • B. Improvement security shall conform with Section 66499 of the California Government Code and one or more of the following: 051 TAMDEPTIAgreemeMs - SIA%29909.wpd a� 1 of 6 00 1) A cash deposit with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company, at City's option. 2) Surety bonds, of the form specified in subsection 664992 of the Califomia Government Code, issued by a surety or sureties listed in the U.S. Department of Treasury Circular 570 (latest version). 3) Certificates of deposit, in City's name, from one or more financial institutions subject to regulation by the state or federal government and having a financial quality rating of "A" or better and a commitment reliability rating of "R-2" or better on the Investment Data Exchange (of the Los Angeles County Treasurer's office). 4) Irrevocable letters of credit, issued by one or more financial institutions meeting the requirements of Paragraph (3), pledging that the funds necessary to carry out the completion of the Improvements are on deposit, guaranteed for payment, and constitute a trust fund which is not subject to levy or attachment by any creditor of the depositor until released by City. Letters of credit shall guarantee that all or any portion of the funds available pursuant to the letters of credit will be paid upon the written demand of City and that such written demand need not present documentation of any type as a condition of payment, including proof of loss. The duration of any such letter of credit shall be for a period of not less than one year from the execution of the agreement with which it is provided and shall state, on its face, that the letter of credit will be automatically renewed until such time that City authorizes its expiration or until sixty (60) days after City receives notice from the financial institution of intent to allow expiration of the letter of credit. 5) A lien upon the subdivided property. if City finds that it would not be in the public interest to require the installation of the Improvements sooner than two (2) years after recordation of the final map or parcel map for which the Improvements are required. The lien shall provide a collateral value of three (3) times the estimated cost of the Improvements and shall include the power of sale of the real property, all buildings and improvements thereon, or that may be erected upon or made thereto, together with all hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging. or in any wise appertaining, and the reservations, remainders, rents, issues, and profits thereof. The collateral value of the property shall be established at Subdividers expense through an appraisal approved by City. 6) An instrument of credit from an agency of the state, federal or local government, when any agency of the state, federal. or local government provides at least Twenty Percent (20°%) of the financing for the Improvements. 7) When Subdivider is a non-profit organization, security may be negotiable bonds, of the kind approved for securing deposits of public moneys with City or in favor of City, as specified in Section 16430 of the California Govemment Code, deposited, at City's option, with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company. C. All securities shall be fumished in accordance with the provisions of Exhibit A. The amount of the performance security shall equal One Hundred Percent (100°%) of the estimated cost of constructing the Improvements, including payment of plan check and permit fees, as estimated by the City Engineer or a duly authorized representative of the City Engineer. The amount of Payment security shall equal the amount of the amount of performance security, except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A, and shall be furnished as a separate security. Warranty security shall equal Ten Percent (10°%) of the amount of performance security except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A. D. At the time of submittal of security, Subdivider shall pay to City administrative fees applicable to the form of security provided. Administrative fees shall apply to the subdivision (final map, parcel map or waiver of parcel map) rather than to individual security instruments. The fees shall be paid separately for each different form and/or source (surety or financial institution) of security initially submitted and for substitution of securities but shall not be required for submittal of warranty security if the warranty security is of the same form and from the same source as the performance security it replaces. Administrative fees for security shall be as follows: 1) For certificates of deposit, bonds and letters of credit as described in Paragraphs 2), 3) and 4) of SECTION 3.B., which require the establishment of evidence of the reliability of the surety or financial institution, the administrative fee shall be One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00). 0 T:V WDEPrA9m w *s - SIA129909.wpd 0 0 � 2 of 1 2) For liens on real property as described in Paragraph 5) of SECTION 3.B., for which City will prepare lien agreements and subordination agreements, administer valuation of the real property and administer • the agreements over the life of the lien, all of which require legal assistance and financial advice, Subdivider shall pay to City an administration fee of One Half of One Percent (0.5%) of the estimated cost of the improvements secured but not less than Five Hundred Dollars (5500.00) nor more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00). 3) For other forms of security listed in Section 3 B. above, there will be no administrative fee. E. Participatory Improvements, if any, are identified in Exhibit A. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place until the Participatory Improvements are constructed and actual costs are known and paid by Subdivider, or until Subdivider pays to City the estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements. and shall guarantee the reimbursement by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost of the Participatory Improvements. Payment security and warranty security shall not be required for Participatory Improvements. Upon written demand from City, Subdivider shall deposit cash with City in lieu of or in replacement of security guaranteeing Participatory Improvements,. If Subdivider fails to deposit said cash within 30 days of the date of the written demand from City. City may present a written demand to Subdivider's Surety for payment of said cash and Subd'nrid�s Surety shall pay to City the lesser of: 1) the amount demanded, or 2) the amount of the security. F. Security shall not expire, be reduced or become wholly or partially invalid for any reason, including non-payment of premiums. modifications of this Agreement and/or expiration of the time for performance stated in this Agreement, without express authorization from City unless the surety provides City with sixty (60) days written notice by registered or certified mail. return receipt requested. G. Security shall be released in the following manner 1) Performance security shall be released upon the final completion and acceptance or approval, • by the City Council of the Improvements subject to the provisions of paragraph B. 2) The City Engineer may authorize partial reduction of performance security as work progresses, upon application by Subdivider. However, no such reduction shall be for an amount less than Ten Percent (10%) of the total performance security provided for the faithful performance of the act or work. In no event shall security be reduced below that required to guarantee the completion of the act or work or obligation secured, plus Ten Percent (10%). The City Engineer shall not allow more than two partial reductions of security furnished for any improvement agreement. 3) Participatory Improvement security shall be released upon .payment by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost or estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements. 4) If City receives no notice of recorded claims of lien, labor and materials security shall be released in full 90 days after final acceptance and/or approval by the City Council, of the Improvements. If City receives notice of any recorded lien, the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act shall apply. 5) Warranty security not utilized during the warranty period shall be released one year after final acceptance or approval by the City Council of all Tract Improvements. However, if at the end of the one-year warranty period, there are one or more outstanding requests by City for performance of work or provision of materials under the terms of the warranty, warranty security shall be retained until the outstanding requests are satisfied or until Subdivider has made other arrangements satisfactory to the City Engineer. 4. Permits Required. Prior to commencing any phase of work, Subdivider shall obtain all permits required for that phase of work and pay all required fees. Work performed under a permit or permits shall comply with all provisions of the required permits. 5. Off -site Improvements. When the construction of one or more of the Improvements requires or • necessitates the acquisition of real property not owned by Subdivider or City, Subdivider shall use its best efforts purchase such real property at a reasonable price. In the event that Subdivider is unsuccessful, despite �`� efforts, to acquire such real property at a reasonable price, Subdivider may request in writing that City TAPMEFDArvenw is - SU129909.wpd o ao(D of a to acquire such real property. City may, but is not required to, agree to attempt to acquire such real property on behalf of Subdivider. If City so agrees, City and Subdivider shall enter a separate written agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Said separate agreement shall provide that Subdivider advance to City One • Hundred Fifty Percent (150%) of the appraised fair market value of the real property. Any unexpended portion of said advance shall be refunded to Subdivider. Any additional funds required for acquisition of the real property shall be paid by Subdivider to City upon the conveyance of said real property to Subdivider. In no event shall the failure of Subdivider or City to acquire such real property excuse, waive, or otherwise terminate Subdividers obligation to construct the applicable improvement pursuant to this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval. 6. Completion of Improvements. Subdivider shall begin construction of the Improvements within ninety (90) days and shall complete construction within twelve (12) months after the approval of this Agreement. Portions of the Improvements may be completed at a later date, as determined by the City Engineer or as set forth in Exhibit A. Failure by Subdivider to begin or complete construction of the Improvements within the specified time periods shall constitute cause for City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare Subdivider in default of this agreement, to revise improvement security requirements as necessary to ensure completion of the improvements, and/or to require modifications in the standards or sequencing of the Improvements in response to changes in standards or conditions affecting or affected by the Improvements. Said failure shall not otherwise affect the validity of this agreement or Subdivider's obligations hereunder. 7. Force Majeure. In the event that Subdivider is unable to perform within the time limits herein due to strikes, act of God. or other events beyond Subdivider's control, the time limits for obligations affected by such events will be extended by the period of such events. 8. Time Extension. Subdivider may make application in writing to the City Council for an extension of time for completion of the Improvements. The City Council, in its sole and absolute discretion, may approve or deny, the request or conditionally approve the extension with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. As a condition of the time extension. Subdivider shall furnish securities, similar in form and substance to • those required in SECTION 3 hereinabove, to cover the period of extension. The value of the securities shall be sufficient to ensure the performance of and payment for Improvements that remain incomplete at the time of the extension, and to provide warranty security on completed Improvements. 9. Survey Monuments. Before final approval of street improvements. Subdivider shall place survey monuments in accordance with the provisions of Sections 66495, et sec. of the Subdivision Map Act and of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Subdivider shall provide the City Engineer written proof that the monuments have been set, evidence of payment and receipt thereof by the engineer or surveyor setting the monuments, and intersection monument tie -outs for monuments set in public streets. 10. Final Acceptance of Improvements. At the completion of construction and prior to acceptance of the Improvements by City, Subdivider shall submit a request for final approval by City. The request shall be accompanied by any required certifications from Subdivider's engineers or surveyors, approval letters from other agencies having jurisdiction over and approval authority for improvements required by this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval, and any required construction quality documentation not previously submitted. Upon receipt of said request, the City Engineer or a duly -authorized representative will review the required documentation and will inspect the Improvements. If the Improvements are determined to be in accordance with applicable City standards and specifications, and as provided herein, obligations required by the Conditions of Approval and this Agreement have been satisfied, and Subdivider has provided revised plans -as required in Paragraph 11, hereinafter, the City Engineer shall recommend acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council. 11. Revisions to Plans. When the Improvements have been inspected and approved by the City Engineer, Subdivider shall make any necessary revisions to the original plans held by City so the plans depict the actual improvements constructed. When necessary revisions havebeen made, each separate sheet of the plans shall . be clearty marked with the words As -Built, As -Constructed,, or Record Drawing, the marking shall be stamped by an engineer or surveyor, as appropriate for the improvements thereon, who is licensed to practice in Califomia, f ; and the plans shall be resubmitted to the City Engineer. O 10 T:1PwD@'rA9raamarKs - SW\29909.wpd __ Paps 4 of 6 12. Improvement Warranty. Subdivider hereby guarantees the Improvements to City for a period of one (1) year, beginning on the date of final acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council, against any defective work or labor done, or defective materials furnished, and shall repair or replace such defective work or materials. 13. Release of Securi . City shall retain and release securities in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of this agreement. Prior to the release of payment security, the City Engineer may require Subdivider to provide a title report or other evidence sufficient to show claims of lien, if any, that may affect the amount of payment security released. 14. City Right to Cure. If Subdivider fails to perform any obligation hereunder and such obligation has not been performed within sixty (60) days after written notice of default from City, then City may perform the obligation, and Subdivider shall pay the entire cost of such performance by City including costs of suit and reasonable attorneys fees incurred by City in enforcing such obligation. In cases of emergency or compelling public interest, as determined by the City Engineer. the requirement for written notice of default and/or the passage of sixty (60) days shall be deemed waived and all other provisions of this Article shall remain in effect. 15. Indemnification. Subdivider hereby binds itself, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, executors, administrators. guarantors, heirs. and assigns, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold City and its officers, employees. agents. representatives. and assigns harmless from and against any losses, claims, demands, actions, or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, arising out of or in any way connected with Subdivider's performance herein under. Including costs of suit and reasonable attorneys' fees. 16. No Modification of Conditions. This Agreement shall in no respect act to modify or amend any provision of the Conditions of Approval. In the event that any requirement or condition of this Agreement is inconsistent with or fails to include one or more provisions of the Conditions of Approval, which document(s) is (are) incorporated herein by reference. the provisions in the Conditions of Approval shall remain in effect and shall control • 17. Severability. In the event that any provision or provisions of this Agreement are held unenforceable, all provisions not so held shall remain in full force and effect. • 18. General Provisions A. All notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or sent by registered or certified mail. return receipt requested, to the parties at their respective addresses indicated hereon. -Notices personally delivered shall be effective upon delivery. Notices mailed as provided herein and sent postage prepaid shall be effective upon the date of delivery or refusal indicated on the return receipt. Either party may change its address for notices hereunder by notice to the other given in the manner provided in this subparagraph. B. The terms. conditions. covenants. and agreements set forth herein shall apply to and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns. and successors of the parties hereto. C. Neither party to this Agreement relies upon any warranty or representation not contained in this Agreement. D. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted with respect to the laws of the State of California. E. In the event of any dispute between the parties with respect to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to prompt payment of its reasonable attorneys' fees from the non -prevailing party. F. Any failure or delay by either party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any such rights or remedies provided for hereunder. T:TWDEMAgroofner s - SIA%29909.wpd Papa 5 of e IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. CITY: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager ATTEST: City Cleric SUBDIVIDER: Reviewed and Approved: City Engineer Approved as to Form: City Attomey T:V'MEP71Apresrr»rtits - SIA%29909.wpd Date City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 7601777-7075 Santa Rosa Plaza. LLC, a Califomia Limited Liability Company, By: Daniel Brown, Trustee of the Fleetwood Salley Trust, Managing Member, By: Bridget Myers, Trustee of the • Kokeka Trust. Managing Member, 49105 Barrymore Street Indio, CA 92201 (760) 777-4077 W� V "�' 4 - ._ Date Date oil Paps 6 of 6 w • • 10 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of / ids/U ss. On /voymfilr �� ! , before me, Date Name and Titie of (e.g., 'Jane Doe, No ry Public") personally appeared Name(s) of signers) OFF ICIAL SEAL MICHELLE RAMOS COMM #1246380 (� Notary Public - California C7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY ,... My Commission Expires DECEMBER 20, 2003 Place Notary Seal Above ❑ personally known to me Xproved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that Fy��xecuted the same in Vs/ el author' capacity ies and that y t}rs'1 thei signatur (�n the instrument the perso s , r the entity upon behalf of which the person ss acted, executed the instrument. ESS my hand and official a r Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: ❑ Individual - Top fluumb here ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: O 1999 National Notary Association • 9350 De Sao Ave.. P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91313.2402 • www.nat*minotary.org Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1-900.6764W r ) a.j 013 Exhibit A SECURITY - PARCEL MAP 29909 Except as otherwise provided herein, Subdivider shall furnish performance security and labor & materials security prior to agendization of the Map for approval by the City Council. Improvements designated as 'Participatory' have been or will be constructed by others. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place indefinitely until called upon or released by City. Monumentation security shall guarantee performance of or payment for the work and shall be utilized or released as specified in Chapter 4, Article 9 of the Subdivision Map Act. The "Engineering & Plans' security will be released when the City has possession of complete, approved, original plans, signed and sealed by a design professional(s), for all required improvements. The "No -Plan Contingency", which may be utilized for any listed item or for other cost found necessary in the design or construction of the required improvements, may be released in whole or part by the City Engineer, at any time after construction plans are complete and the scope and nature of improvements are fully known. These releases shall be separate from and in addition to the reductions discussed below. As elements of the work are completed, Subdivider may request a maximum of two partial releases of performance security. Partial releases shall be for not less than ten percent (10%) of the total performance security for the tract and shall not reduce total performance security below the amount necessary to complete the Improvements plus ten percent (10%) of the original amount. Partial releases of performance security will be evaluated and may be granted, in whole or in part, by the City Engineer. Requests for partial releases, setting forth in detail the amount of work completed and the value thereof, shall be made in writing to the City Engineer. Labor & materials security shall remain in place until 90 days after all required tract improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council. 40 Improvement Description Performance Labor & Materials Grading $157,350 $157,350 Streets, On Site 82,400 82,400 Domestic Water 189,400 189,400 Sanitary Sewer 64,500 64,500 Dry Utilities (Elect.) 35,000 35,000 Perimeter Landscaping 126,000 126,000 Monumentation 5.000 0 Construction Subtotal: $659,650 $654,650 Professional Fees Design & Construction (15%) 98,950 $791,580 Contingency (20% of Project) 151,720 Total: $910,320 • 014 44 _.�Incoxroxnim G� of A AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 5, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution Accepting a Donation From Wal-Mart to the Senior Center RECOMMENDATION: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council accepting a cash donation from Wal-Mart to the La Quinta Senior Center. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The La Quinta Wal-Mart store designates a portion of the profits from the third Saturday of December to be given to a local organization that serves the community. This year, the La Quinta Wal-Mart has donated one thousand four hundred fifty five dollars and twenty one cents ($1,455.21) to the La Quinta Senior Center. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council accepting a cash donation from Wal-Mart to the La Quinta Senior Center; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution accepting the donation; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. 065 55die ctfull submitted, Horvi z, ClInmunity Services Director Approved for submission by: OF Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.183.WAL-MART DONATION.wpd RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ACCEPTING A GIFT WHEREAS, on January 24, 2002, Wal-Mart generously donated One Thousand Four Hundred Fifty Five Dollars and Twenty One Cents to the La Quinta Senior Center. WHEREAS, the gift was offered for donation to the City of La Quinta and was not given to or limited to the use of any particular employee or official; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of La Quinta to accept the donation. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does hereby RESOLVE as follows: The City of La Quinta hereby accepts the donation from this organization to the La Quinta Senior Center. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of February, 2002 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California T 0 0 itif 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL,/RDA MEETING DATE: February 5, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Approval of Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) and Authorization to Advertise for Bid, Project No. 1999-04A, Avenue 52 Safety Improvements BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 1 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) and authorization to advertise for bid, Project No. 1999-04A, Avenue 52 Safety Improvements, from Jefferson Street to Cetrino (Attachment 1). The following represents the available funding and funding sources: FUNDING SOURCE ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT Surface Transportation Program Funds 401-000-466-486 $67,000 Infrastructure Funds T 401-000-493-000 $15,243 TOTAL: $82,243 The following represents the project budget: Construction: $67,000 Design: $6,700 Inspection/Testing: $5,193 Administration: $3,350 TOTAL: $82,243 Since this project is partially funded with Federal funding, the project must be bid utilizing prevailing wages. Therefore, there are no Charter City implications. 009 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020205d.wpd The proposed safety improvements on Avenue 52, from Jefferson Street west to Cetrino, include widening the existing shoulder on the south side of the street by six (6) feet and modification to the signing and striping on the south side of the street. In June 1998, the project was submitted to Caltrans for funding in the Fiscal Year 2000/2001 Hazard Elimination Safety (HES) Program. The project was approved to receive HES funding on July 15, 1999. The project was approved by the City Council as part of the Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). On July 17, 2001, Caltrans approved the City of La Quinta's obligation submittal package for the proposed safety improvements and authorized the City to proceed with design. The PS&E is now complete and the project is ready to advertise for bid. The PS&E is available for review in the Public Works Department. Based upon a February 5, 2002 City Council authorization to receive bids, the following represents how the project is expected to proceed: Caltrans STP Fund Obligation February 1, 2002 - March 1, 2002 Advertisement for Bid (30 Days) March 2, 2002 - April 1, 2002 Project Award April 16, 2002 Construction Period (120 Days) May 1, 2002 - May 31, 2002 Project Acceptance June 2002 The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve the Plans, Specifications and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) and authorization to advertise for bid, Project No. 1999-04A, Avenue 52 Safety Improvements, from Jefferson Street to Cetrino; or 2. Do not approve the Plans, Specifications and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) and authorization to advertise for bid, Project No. 99-04A, Avenue 52 Safety Improvements, from Jefferson Street to Cetrino; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. 07 t 002 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020205d.wpd 1. Respectfully submitted, y F. Step a n, P.E. Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map TAPW D EPT\CO U NC I L\2002\020205d. wpd 003 ATTACHMENT W z H ci w O a H N Z WD W W 2 :) W z > OT > C as 2 I. 005 T a 0 4hf 4 4 a" AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 5, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Approval of a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Willdan to Prepare Plans, Specifications, and Engineers Estimate (PS&E) for the Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 Traffic Signal Improvement Program, Project No. 2001-10 BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 5 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Willdan in the amount of $15,919.00, for the preparation of plans, specifications, and engineer's estimates for the Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 Traffic Signal Improvement Program, Project No. 2001-10. On July 17, 2001, the City Council approved and adopted the Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 through Fiscal Year 2005/2006 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). This year's CIP included funding for a new traffic signal at Avenue 52/Avenida Bermudas and the installation of emergency vehicle preemption devices at seven locations. The following table represents the available funding: PROJECT FUNDING SOURCE AMOUNT AVAILABLE Traffic Signal at Ave. 52/Ave. Bermudas Developer Impact Fee -Transportation $175,000.00 Emergency Vehicle Preemption at Six Locations Infrastructure Fee $109,000.00 JPIA Grant $25,000.00 TOTAL FUNDING: $309,000,00 The following represents the approved project budget: CATEGORY AMOUNT Administration: $13,750.00 Engineering: $55,000.00 Technical: $24,750.00 Construction: $215,500.00 TOTAL: $309,000.00 073 TAPW DEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020205a. wpd As illustrated, adequate funding is available to support staff's recommendation. The project is 100% funded with locally generated revenue. The project is not required to be bid using prevailing wage specifications and may result in lower construction bids. On July 17, 2001, the City Council approved and adopted the Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 CIP as part of the annual budget. The new signal at Avenue 52/Avenida Bermudas and the installation of emergency vehicle preemption devices are included as follows: Project No. 1 - New Traffic Signal at Avenue 52/Avenida Bermudas Construct a new traffic signal at the intersection of Avenue 52 and Avenida Bermudas Project No. 2 - Emergency Vehicle Preemption/Public Safety Program Install Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) devices at six intersections. This project will complete the City's Preemption Program. Each signalized intersection will be equipped with an EVP sensor which assigns priority to emergency service vehicles. The proposed intersections include: Eisenhower Drive/Coachella Drive; Eisenhower Drive/Avenida Fernando; Washington Street/Eisenhower Drive; Washington Street/Avenue 47; Washington Street/Channel Drive; Jefferson Street/Vista Grande; and Highway 1 1 1 /Depot Drive. On November 6, 2001, the City Council authorized staff to distribute a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the preparation of plans, specifications, and engineer's estimate for the Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 Traffic Signal Improvement Program and approved a Consultant Selection Committee consisting of the following individuals: • John M. Freeland, Senior Engineer • Leonard St. Sauver, Assistant Engineer I • Nick Nickerson, Contract Project Manager On December 14, 2001, the City of La Quinta received proposals to prepare the PS&E for the Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 Traffic Signal Improvement Program from the following 3 firms: 1) Willdan 2) RBF Consulting 3) Tetra Tech, Inc. After careful consideration, the Consultant Selection Committee unanimously selected Willdan as its primary choice for the preparation of the PS&E for the Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 Traffic Signal Improvement Program. T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020205a.wpd 002 Attachment 1 is the staff -negotiated PSA in the amount of $15,919.00 for professional traffic engineering services to prepare the PS&E for a new traffic signal at the intersection of Avenue 52 and Avenida Bermudas and for EVP modification plans for five of the proposed six locations identified above. The intersection on Highway 1 1 1 at Depot Drive is currently proposed to be modified by an adjacent private developer (Komar Investments). The proposed PSA identifies this location as an optional EVP design location. Komar Investments is proposing to modify the traffic signal at this location in conjunction with other street improvements. If for some unforseen reason Komar Investments does not carry through with the greater street improvements, staff will initiate the EVP design and/or include the minor EVP modification as part of the future Highway 111 improvements. Considering City Council initiation of a design contract on February 5, 2001, the following represents how the project is expected to proceed: Approval of PSA Project Design (60 Days) Approval of PS&E Advertise for Bid Contract Award February 5, 2002 February 2002 - April 2002 May 2002 May 2002 - June 2002 July 2002 The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Willdan, in the amount of $15,919.00, for the preparation of plans, specifications, and engineer's estimates for the Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 Traffic Signal Improvement Program; or 2. Do not approve a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Willdan, in the amount of $15,919.00, for the preparation of plans, specifications, and engineer's estimates for the Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 Traffic Signal Improvement Program; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully su Roy/F. Stepfief on, P.E. Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer 009 TAMDEMCOUNCI L\2002\020205a. wpd Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Professional Services Agreement CI "1 6 004 T:\PWDEPT\COU NO L\2002\020205a. wpd ATTACHMENT 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (the "Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA, ("City"), a California municipal corporation, and Willdan ("Consultant"). The parties hereto agree as follows: 1.0 SERVICES OF CONSULTANT 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide those services related to Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 Traffic Signal Improvement Program, Project 2001-10 as specified in the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference (the "services" or "work"). Consultant warrants that all services will be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner in accordance with the standards prevalent in the industry for such services. 1.2 Compliance with Law. All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, regulations and laws of the City of La Quinta and any Federal, State or local governmental agency of competent jurisdiction. 1.3 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Except as otherwise specified herein, Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. 1.4 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that (a) it has thoroughly investigated and considered the work to be performed, (b) it has investigated the site of the work and fully acquainted itself with the conditions there existing, (c) it has carefully considered how the work should be performed, and (d) it fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the work under this Agreement. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the work or as represented by City, it shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant's risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer (as defined in Section 4.2 hereof). 1.5 Care of Work. Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work performed by Consultant, and the equipment, materials, papers and other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City's own negligence. The performance of services by Consultant shall not relieve Consultant from any obligation to correct any incomplete, inaccurate or defective work at no further cost to City, when such inaccuracies are due to the negligence of Consultant. 1.6 Additional Services. In accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform services in addition to those specified in the Scope of Services when directed to do so by the Contract Officer, provided that Consultant shall not be required to perform any additional services without compensation. Any addition in compensation not exceeding five percent (5%) of the Contract Sum may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increase must be approved by the City Council. C:\MyFi1es\CLQFILES\2001_10 CW Signals\WilldanPSA.wpd Page 1 of,9• 008 1.7 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in Exhibit "Y (the "Special Requirements"). In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Special Requirements and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Special Requirements shall govern. 2.0 COMPENSATION 2.1 Contract Sum. For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall be compensated in accordance with Exhibit "B" (the "Schedule of Compensation") in a total amount not to exceed Fifteen Thousand Nine Hundred Nineteen Dollars ($15,919.00) (the "Contract Sum"), except as provided in Section 1.6. The method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation may include a lump sum payment upon completion, payment in accordance with the percentage of completion of the services, payment for time and materials based upon Consultant's rate schedule; � but not exceeding the Contract Sum, or such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, transportation expense, telephone expense, and similar costs and expenses when and if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. 2.2 Method of Payment. Any month in which Consultant wishes to receive payment, Consultant shall submit to City no later than the tenth (10th) working day of such month, in the form approved by City's Finance Director, an invoice for services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. Such invoice shall (1) describe in detail the services provided, including time and materials, and (2) specify each staff member who has provided services and the number of hours assigned to each such staff member. Such invoice shall contain a certification by a principal member of Consultant specifying that the payment requested is for work performed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. City will pay Consultant for all expenses stated thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement no later than the last working day of the month. 3:0 PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. 3.2 Schedule of Performance. All services rendered pursuant to this Agreement .shall be performed diligently and within the time period established in Exhibit "C" (the "Schedule of Performance"). Extensions to the time period specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer. 3.3 Force Maieure. The time period specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemic, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, acts of any governmental agency other than City, and unusually severe weather, if Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the forced delay when and if in his or her judgement such delay is justified, and the Contract Officer's determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. C:\MyFi1es\CLQFILES\2001_10 CW Signa1s\Wi11danPSA.wpd Page 2 of 0 O 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Sections 7.7 or 7.8 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance. 4.0 COORDINATION OF WORK 4.1 Representative of Consultant. The following principals of Consultant are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: a. Lew Gluesing, P.E., Vice -President b. Ken Hanson, Senior Project Manager It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. The foregoing principals may not be changed by Consultant and no other personnel may be assigned to perform the service required hereunder without the express written approval of City. 4.2 Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be John M. Freeland, Senior Engineer or such other person as may be designated by the City Manager of City. It shall be Consultant's responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. 4.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Except as set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be assigned or transferred, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of City. 4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. 4.5 City Cooperation. City shall provide Consultant with any plans, publications, reports, statistics, records or other data or information pertinent to services to be performed hereunder which are reasonably available to Consultant only from or through action by City. V713 008 CAMyFi1es\CLQFILES\2001_10 CW Signa1s\Wi11danPSA.wpd Page 3 of 9 5.0 INSURANCE, INDEMNIFICATION AND BONDS. 5.1 Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its cost, and submit concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, personal and public liability and property damage insurance against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property resulting from Consultant's acts or omissions rising out of or related to Consultant's performance under this Agreement. The insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that the coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Consultant's performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to any such loss. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming City and its officers and employees as additional insured shall be delivered to and approved by City prior to commencement of the services hereunder. The amount of insurance required hereunder shall be determined by the Contract Sum in accordance with the following table: Contract Sum Personal Injury/Property Damage Coverage Less than $50,000 $100,000 per individual; $300,000 per occurrence $50,000 - $300,000 $250,000 per individual; $500,000 per occurrence Over $300,000 $500,000 per individual; $1,000,000 per occurrence Consultant shall carry automobile liability insurance of $1,000,000 per accident against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property arising out of the use of any automobile by Consultant, its officers, any person directly or indirectly employed by Consultant, any subcontractor or agent, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, arising directly or indirectly out of or related to Consultant's performance under this Agreement. The term "automobile" includes, but is not limited to, a land motor vehicle, trailer or semi -trailer designed for travel on public roads. The automobile insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Consultant's performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to such loss. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming City and its officers and employees as additional insured shall be delivered to and approved by City prior to commencement of the services hereunder. Consultant shall carry Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with State Worker's Compensation laws. Consultant shall procure professional errors and omissions liability insurance in an amount acceptable to City. All insurance required by this Section shall be kept in effect during the term of this Agreement and shall not be cancelable without thirty (30) days written notice to City of proposed cancellation. The procuring of .such insurance or the delivery of policies or certificates evidencing the same shall not be construed as a limitation of Consultant's obligation to indemnify City, its officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, or agents. 5.2 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, its officers, employees, representatives and agents, from and against those actions, suits, proceedings, claims, demands, losses, costs, and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys' fees, for injury to or death of person(s), for damage to property (including property owned by City) and for errors and omissions committed by Consultant, its officers, employees and agents, which arise out of Consultant's negligent performance under this Agreement, except to the extent of 0 1 such loss as may be caused by City's own negligence or that of its officers or employees. CAMyFi1es\CLQFILES\2001_10 CW Signals\WilldanPSA.wpd Page 4 of 9 5.3 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have if Consultant fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option: a. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement. b. Order Consultant to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Consultant hereunder until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. C. Terminate this Agreement. Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to any other remedies City may have. The above remedies are not the exclusive remedies for Consultant's failure to maintain or secure appropriate policies or. endorsements. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Consultant's or its subcontractors' performance of work under this Agreement. 6.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS. 6.1 Reports. Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning Consultant's performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. 6.2 Records. Consultant shall keep such books and records as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the cost and the performance of such services. Books and records pertaining to costs shall be kept and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals. The .Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all reasonable times, including the right to inspect, copy, audit, and make records and transcripts from such records. 6.3 Ownership of Documents. Originals of all drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials, whether in hard copy or electronic form, which are prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement, shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon termination of this Agreement or upon the earlier request of the Contract Officer, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership of the documents and materials hereunder. Consultant shall cause all subcontractors to assign to City any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages suffered thereby. In the event City or any person, firm or corporation authorized by City reuses said documents and materials without written verification or adaptation by Consultant for the specific purpose intended and causes to be made or makes any changes or alterations in said documents and materials, City hereby releases, discharges, and exonerates Consultant from liability resulting from said change. The provisions of this clause shall survive the completion of this Contract and shall thereafter remain in full force and effect. 6.4 Release of Documents. The drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials prepared by Consultant in the performance of services under this Agreement shall 0 8 1 c� JL CAMyFi1es\CLQFILES\2001_10 CW Signals\WilldanPSA.wpd Page 5,,9f 9 ' not be released publicly without the prior written approval of the Contract Officer or as required by law. Consultant shall not disclose to any other entity or person any information regarding the activities of City, except as required by law or as authorized by City. 7.0 ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT. 7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. 7.2 Disputes. In the event of any dispute arising under this Agreement, the injured party shall notify the injuring party in writing of its contentions by submitting a claim therefor. The injured party shall continue performing its obligations hereunder so long as the injuring party commences to cure such default within ten (10) days of service of such notice and completes the cure of such default within forty-five (45) days after service of the notice, or such longer period as may be permitted by the Contract Officer; provided that if the default is an immediate danger to the health, safety and general welfare, City may take such immediate action as City deems warranted. Compliance with the provisions of this section shall be a condition precedent to termination of this Agreement for cause and to any legal action, and such compliance shall not be a waiver of any party's right to take legal action in the event that the dispute is not cured, provided that nothing herein shall limit City's right to terminate this Agreement without cause pursuant to Section 7.8. 7.3 Retention of Funds. City may withhold from any monies payable to Consultant sufficient funds to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages it reasonably believes were suffered by City due to the default of Consultant in the performance of the services required by this Agreement. 7.4 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. City's consent or approval of any act by Consultant requiring City's consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary City's consent to or approval of any subsequent act of Consultant. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 7.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, at law or at equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. 7.7 Termination Prior To Expiration Of Term. This section shall govern any termination of this Agreement, except as specifically provided in the following Section 7.8 for termination for cause. City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, C:\MyFi1es\CLQFILES\2001_10 CW Signals\WilldanPSA.wpd Page 6 of 9 upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Consultant. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to receipt of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. 7.8 Termination For Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to Consultant for the purpose of setoff or partial payment of the amounts owed City as previously stated in Section 7.3. 7.9 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit from the losing party. 8.0 CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES; NONDISCRIMINATION. 8.1 Non -liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event or any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 8.2 Conflict of Interest. No officer or employee of City shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in. any decision relating to the Agreement which affects his or her personal interest or the interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which she. or he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or general consideration for obtaining this Agreement. 8.3 Covenant against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry. 9.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9.1 Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, communication either party desires or is required to give the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail to the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty-eight (48) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section. 083 CAMyFi1es\CLQFILES\2001_10 CW Signals\WilldanPSA.wpd Page 7 of 9 O k 12 To City: CITY OF LA QUINTA Attention: Thomas P. Genovese 78-495 Calle Tampico P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, California 92253 To Consultant: WILLDAN Attention: Lew Gluesing, P.E., Vice President 13191 Crossroads Parkway North, Suite 405 Industry, CA 91746-3497 9.2 Integrated Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the parties and all previous understanding, negotiations and agreements are integrated into and superseded by this Agreement. 9.3 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the parties by an instrument in writing signed by both parties. 9.4 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgement or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder. 9.5 Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that by so executing this Agreement the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates stated below. CITY OF LA QUINTA a California municipal corporation Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Date ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney CAMyFi1es\CLQFILES\2001 10 CW Signa1s\Wi11danPSA.wpd Page 8 of 9 !1 :� v 0 CONSULTANT: WILLDAN By: Name: Title: Date: CAMyFiles\CLQFILES\2001_10 CW Signals\WiIIdanPSA.\vM Page 9-of 9 04 Exhibit A Scope of Services PROFESSIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 Traffic Signal Improvement Program, Project 2001-10 In general, the project includes the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E), and contract bid documents for the following street improvements: Project No. 1 - Avenue 52/Avenida Bermudas Traffic Signal Improvement. Preparation of Traffic Signal Warrant analysis; Preparation of PS&E. Project No. 2 - Emergency Vehicle Preemption retro-fit at five locations, including: • Eisenhower Drive/Coachella Drive • Eisenhower Drive/Avenida Fernando • Washington Street/Eisenhower Drive • Washington Street/Channel Drive • Jefferson Street/Vista Grande Optional Location: • Highway I I I /Depot Drive Willdan's scope of services is attached and made a part of this agreement. 08 CITY OF LA QUINTA Professional Engineering and Design Services for Fiscal Year 2001/2002 Traffic Signal Improvement Program Scope of Work 1. Kick-off meeting with City staff to approve final scope of work project design constraints and objectives, and review any previous concept plans. 2. Perform traffic warrant study for Avenue 52/Avenida Bermudas Project 1. • Obtain traffic counts. • Obtain accident records from City. • Perform warrant analysis 3. Perform field survey and base map preparation for Avenue 52/Avendia Bermudas. • Survey jobsight for geographical information, utilities, and existing traffic control devices. • Prepare base maps in AutoCAD. 4. Utility coordination Projects 1 and 2 • Contact all utilities and coordinate existing facilities with proposed installation of traffic signal. • Prepare notices. 5. Prepare traffic signal, striping plans, and emergency vehicle preempt plans. • Design traffic signal plans for Avenue 52/Avenida Bermudas. • Design striping plans for Avenue 52/Avenida Bermudas. • Design emergency vehicle preempt (EVP) modification plans for Project 2: Eisenhower/Coachella Eisenhower/Fernando Washington/Eisenhower Washington/Channel JeffersonNista Grande Highway11/Depot • Submit plans for 80 percent review. 6. Revise traffic signal plans, striping plans, and EVP plans based on input from City staff. • Revise plans and specifications based on City comments. • Resubmit plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) for 90 percent review. 087 E:\95610-02\06-160\Oldprop 06-160\2001\P01-233R1 Scope of Work.doc 01 111 7. Revise PS&Es based on comments received from the City. • Provide final approved PS&E bid documents for bidding and coordinate advertising job. • All approved plans will be provided to the City on compact disk in AutoCAD 12 format, as well as on "D" size Mylar and 11"X17" bond format. Specification documents, including technical specifications, will be provided on 3%2" disks in Microsoft Word 2000 for Windows format. The engineer's estimate will be provided in Microsoft Excel 2000 for Windows format. 8. Provide technical assistance during bidding process • Provide technical assistance as necessary. • Coordinate advertisement of the project for bid. 0881 E:\95610-02\06-160\Oldprop 06-160\2001\P01-233R1 Scope of Work.doc Exhibit B Schedule of Compensation Payment shall be in full at the rates listed in the Schedule of Billing Rates attached herewith on a Fixed Fee basis, in conformance with Section 2.2 of the Agreement. Total compensation for all work under this contract shall not exceed Fifteen Thousand Nine Hundred Nineteen Dollars ($15,919.00) (the "Contract Sum"), except as specified in Section 1.6 - Additional Services of the Agreement. Reimbursable expenses shall be billed at cost plus. The City of La Quinta may at its sole discretion add the Highway 1 1 1 /Depot Drive to the Emergency Vehicle Preemption retro-fit design locations for the fixed fee of One Thousand Two Hundred Sixteen Dollars ($1,216.00). Willdan's Fee Proposal is attached and made a part of this agreement. ♦r C O L a E J M Q C cr) SO Oco IL I a �- w N w L Q F- E Z L' a) � m CY ev a J � Q N LO 4) 4) Q �00000 00000 0 O 0 O 00 Oo 0000 0 0 0 Q 00000 L6 co MN M�cnCCcc VON►OC) tM c0 r (V O CA 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69* ^r • :. O O N C O N c0 N M V) Cot LO .a m ) V C ' H F O • (C N t0 I O O cv <' E9 O cn ccn 69 �a • r, O O M O O .LO - LO ccn O a • N f- cM a .- .- (O t00 E9 O O LO LOr- CD cm C Mr a) a) n, cc C -2 N N 0 U U Occp c c y v 0 o m w `O c c"e U U E L C N N ] fD N OL y N m U � w C C co w 3 c C E µ c O w c y N =- p cc f0 c N Cl.i-. p 7 C) H rL•+ N ` C U W C_ :• Z �C°Uv��'y�3�� N v > »-�- U > ad C C C U C O Y C C > 2 d N>>> L f0 C C r- V N. C C C•1 e C N 2O fC CiF= U UAW W IL—�M 0) c v co °6 otf cu O W W E� 2 Ob 2 `��° a- a.mxtL EMn E y ovQQ •> 'Y U= N • 7 > N m •Q > m d .p > O` O O YHLL a` �cnw �cqw �Oaa�F- `O • Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 0 Y far.; M C7 H 0 C7 C7 M !C M C] v. y fA 10 C IA �C � 10*1 (A 10 :z� H H f•- H F- r- H N H c'y F- n 1. q O m 0 J iz J ♦' Cl) w a O a� W 0 W = LL a Z 5o 0.2 _ J .0 A c.i d W 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000cri OOM Sri O 0 N 666666 r CNN 000 N co UA It co N N M .07 69 61% 64 613 U3, 6% 69 69 69 69 69 W • "z' O C • (O • 0 • 0 O O .,:. • • CO � M M d COO O � ss'F qt "` 69 O • O O • N N .- 69 0 n • O 0 • • • N O <O (� � N 64 II 4) N O O r- N co O C O Q) 00 C CO `° CL 'N w 60 C) o . N n L O ` C �, u) N >o -o 4. oCL m w" D cm c O ZP m c v c `o o O CL C cc =' t6 C O rrv. cu c O cC c `'= C 4) E r > cc c !_' U 4) ccn E L 0(D L ) C N m d 41 "vCD d '— 7 v U it N *,' oa f/) CDCLC� 4)-o en Ea 3 m> > NmC1 O m V N m O O N 2 N w CwO W W c_O C w 4) � oa (n co 4) d O O) °a atj LL 4) c ' f/� W =..v E Z oa E> ww COcn as �_U. S U N ._. N O 0)4) .J J d�>�_ >� Yu �a �ww O 0HH G mow 4) 4) .Q 0a-a-X 2 O O - � Y N fYN 0 0 U)� U) N to � x':HFHF-� HN Leh F— M M 0- 9 N � a 0�o Exhibit C Schedule of Performance Consultant shall complete all services in accordance with the project schedule, which is attached and made a part of this agreement. 0 9-I IP Z. ;. L 4 C . V V.C. / V %0 & ............ --- -------- ri ICY Co .. .. ... ...... 11, k iijl .... ... .... ....... ....... . ........ IfU4 19 ui js ..... . .. .. uj co > a Jf ID to a cv 5 C 0 IN in a 96 A M EL Cl is t 0 N Imo' La m 06 c 49 3A 0 to IA. qr! cm J9 Te as r) 9 - 04- Exhibit D Special Requirements None. 094 023 T a 0 414f 4 QUAM COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: ITEM TITLE: February 5, 2002 Adoption of a Resolution Supporting Proposition 42, The Transportation Congestion Improvement Act RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council supporting Proposition 42, the Transportation Congestion Improvement Act. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Proposition 42, the Transportation Congestion Improvement Act, will go before voters on the March 5, 2002 statewide ballot. Proposition 42 will amend the State constitution to dedicate gasoline sales tax revenues to transportation purposes. Beginning in 2003, gas taxes collected by the State will be deposited in a "Transportation Investment Fund" and used for projects identified in the Governor's current Traffic Congestion Relief Program. Thereafter, in 2008-09 and beyond, the funds would be allocated as follows: 40% to the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). 20% divided among counties (based on the State's existing formula for allocating transportation funds to counties) for maintenance, rehabilitation, reconstruction and storm damage repair. 20% divided among cities (based on the State's existing formula for allocating transportation funds to cities) for pothole repair, street maintenance, safety improvements and local transportation projects. 20% for construction and expansion of transit projects. Proposition 42 will not raise taxes - it is designed to ensure that gasoline taxes are dedicated to state and local transportation projects. Attachment 1 contains more information regarding Proposition 42 from the "Taxpayers for Traffic Relief/Yes on 42 Coalition." The League of California Cities is supporting Proposition 42, and the cities of Cathedral City, Indio, Palm Springs, and Palm Desert have adopted supporting resolutions. Should the City Council choose to support Proposition 42, a copy of the Resolution will be forwarded to the League of California Cities, and to the Yes on 42 Coalition for inclusion on their list of supporting organizations. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council supporting Proposition 42, the Transportation Congestion Improvement Act; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council supporting Proposition 42, the Transportation Congestion Improvement Act; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Debbie Powell, Management Analyst Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Information from "Taxpayers for Tax Relief/Yes on 42 Coalition" 090 002 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 42, THE TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT ACT WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will help make our roads safer and reduce traffic without higher taxes by requiring the gasoline sales taxes we already pay be used to improve mass transit, highways and local roads; and WHEREAS, Proposition 42 is based on the principle that taxes paid at the gas pump should be used for transportation purposes; and WHEREAS, traffic is paralyzing travel with Los Angeles now ranked the number one most congested urban area in the country, San Francisco/Oakland second, San Diego sixth and Sacramento, San Jose and San Bernardino/Riverside following close behind; and WHEREAS, with our neglected transportation system needing attention, California has the most deteriorated roads in the nation and more than 6,000 of our bridges and overpasses are structurally deficient or no longer meet highway safety or design standards; and WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will provide a stable and ongoing source of transportation funding that will make it possible to plan for our future transportation needs; and WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will guarantee funds to every city and county to help fix potholes, repair dangerous road conditions and improve the safety of children walking or biking to school; and WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will help speed 'up highway safety and traffic relief projects, and expand and improve mass transit systems; and WHEREAS, all Proposition 42 projects will be subject to an annual audit and standard accounting practices to ensure they are delivered on time and on budget; and WHEREAS, by speeding up transportation projects thousands of new construction and other jobs will be created, our economy will be stimulated and every dollar invested in our highways will result in almost six times that in economic benefits; 097 003 City Council Resolution No. 2002- Support of Proposition 42 February 5, 2002 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the City of La Quinta supports Proposition 42. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 5th day of February 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 09 ATTACHMENT 1 SAFER ROADS AND i-lailAR I TRAFFIC RELIEF Let's get moving again! December 2001 Dear Local Government Official, Please join the League of California Cities in supporting Proposition 42, the Transportation Congestion Improvement Act, on the March 5, 2002 statewide ballot. As you may already know, Proposition 42 would allocate a portion of the existing state sales tax on gasoline to cities and counties to be used for transportation improvements. Cities and counties combined will receive 40 percent of the Proposition 42 revenues. Twenty percent of will be earmarked for cities for local street repairs and maintenance. Twenty percent of the revenue will be earmarked for counties for local road repairs and maintenance. Another 20 percent is provided to public transit agencies, and the remaining 40 percent goes to the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), which is primarily composed of locally -identified projects. Proposition 42 is an important measure for all cities and counties as it would provide a much needed on- going reliable source of funding for our streets, roads and other local transportation projects. Proposition 42 is especially important now as many local transportation sales tax measures are set to expire over the next few years. hope that you and your council will join the League of California Cities and the Yes on Proposition 42 campaign coalition of law enforcement and transportation officials, business, labor unions and taxpayers in supporting this measure. Enclosed please find a sample support form and resolution. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact campaign coalition director Ted Green at (310) 996-2671 (tgreen@woodwardmcdowell.com) or campaign internal education director Jason Barnett at (650) 340-0470(jbarnett@woodwardmcdowell.com). Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Christopher McKenzie Executive Director, League of California Cities r19 9 006 TAXPAYERS FOR TRAFFIC RELIEF/YES ON 42 - A COALITION OF TAXPAYERS, CONSTRUCTION, BUSINESS, LABOR, ENGINEERS AND COMMUTERS 11300 West Olympic Blvd. #840 - Los Angeles, CA 90064.310/996-2671 - Fax 310/996-2673 111 Anza Blvd. #406 - Burlingame, CA 94010.650/340-0470 - Fax 650/340-1740 website: www.yesprop42.com - e-mail: info@yesprop42.com — ! I0 SAFER ROADS AND TRAFFIC RELIEF Let's get moving again! SAFER ROADS - TRAFFIC RELIEF - WITHOUT NEW TAXES Requires the gasoline sales tax —A TAX WE ALREADY PAY AT THE PUMP —be used to improve highways, local roads and mass transit. An annual audit of Prop. 42 funds will be required to help guarantee transportation projects get delivered on time and on budget. Improve Highway, Bridge and Street Safety California's once safe and beautiful highways are now the third most deteriorated roadways in the nation, and growing less safe by the day. More than 6000 California bridges and overpasses are structurally deficient or no longer meet highway safety or design standards. Prop. 42 will provide desperately needed funds to help fix potholes and repair dangerous roads, highways, bridges, intersections and school routes — in every city and county in the state. Speed Up Traffic Relief and Mass Transit Projects Los Angeles has the most congested traffic in the country. San Francisco/Oakland is second, San Diego sixth, and Sacramento, San Jose and San Bernardino/Riverside follow close behind. Prop. 42 guarantees gasoline sales taxes — taxes we already pay — will be used for transportation improvements. It will help speed up the delivery of planned traffic relief projects on highways and local roads, and expand local bus and commuter services, such as VTA in San Jose, Sacramento light rail, MUNI, Green and Blue lines in L.A., the San Diego trolley, BART, Caltrain, Capitol Corridor, Southern California's MetroLink, ACE, and the Coasters in San Diego. Create Jobs and Stimulate the Economy Speeding up transportation projects has the added benefit of creating thousands of new jobs in construction, engineering and related services — at a time when we need them the most. Every dollar spent on highway improvements generates about six times that amount in economic benefits. Join California Highway Patrol Commissioner Dwight Helmick, the California Organization of Police and Sheriffs (COPS), California Fire Chiefs Association, California Office of Emergency Services Director Dallas Jones, Cal -`ornia Taxpayers' Association, California State Automobile Association -AAA, Automobile Club of Southern California -AAA, California Transit Association, Transportation California, California Alliance for Jobs, California Taxpayer Protection Committee, California State Association of Counties, League of California Cities, California Chamber of Commerce, labor unions, seismic safety engineers, local and state transportation officials, seniors, commuters, transit riders, parents and many others. YES on PROP. 42 100 007 SAFER ROADS -TRAFFIC RELIEF -WITHOUT NEW TAXES TAXPAYERS FOR TRAFFIC RELIEF/YES ON 42 - A COALITION OF TAXPAYERS, CONSTRUCTION, BUSINESS, LABOR, ENGINEERS AND COMMUTERS 11300 West Olympic Blvd. #840 - Los Angeles, CA 90064.310/996-2671 - Fax 310/996-2673 1214 111 Anza Blvd. #406 - Burlingame, CA 94010.650/340-0470 • Fax 650/340-1740 website: www.yesprop42.com - e-mail: info@yesprop42.com 01/17/02 03:32 FAX M Prop. 42 At A Glance Regirnning in 2003, Propositiou 42 will dedicate the existing sales tax on gasoline tO transportation projects, and subject that flirndirlg to quo► annual audit of by the Department Of Fivanee. All projects will be subject to accounting practices designed to ensure they are delivered on tivaC send on budget_ ➢ Estimated gasoline sales tax revenues are $1.2 to $1.5 billion a year. > The govemor`s Traffic Congestion Relief Program made a six-ytar commitment of the gmlule sales tax to pay for The progran''s identified projects- Prop. 42 will ensur* that fauding is guskra.nteed for thnse projects and extend gasolime I ales tax funds Into 11te future to assure motorists these %,Ids will entttinue to fund street, road, highway and public transit iimprovements. Beginning in 2008 (puce The Governor's progarn ends), Prop. 42 funds wi►H be allocated sm follows: 40% will be help find the State Trampvrtation I prow rnmt pros,,,, (STIp). This is the state'$1049--term t wsN Cation p arming blucprint with mod, highway and tr2nsif projects idetttified by local tranapo on aPncies and afthorized by the California rrffisportation Commission_ 20" will go specifim Iy to transit projects for construction of new transit projects and hxcreszing and "ending operations of existing lines. 200/o will be divided among the counties ,- according to an misting agreed upm formula — to fumd pothole repair, street maintena e, ssf ety / improvemen is and local transportation projects. V 4' 200/6 will be divided among the cities — a=T&A& to an existing upon formula -- to or�- fid pothole repak, street mai]aUn ce, safety improvO ents and local transportation prej Cots. All m ail — 80% of Prop. 4.2 funds will be vied for locaRy-determined projects. > Im the event Of so emergency need for state ids, Prop. 42 vvm written to give lawmakers the' flexibility necessary to temporarily use the gasolirLc sales tax money. The Gvvcrnor and the Ugislatum can (in an officially declwW state of emergency, and with a two-thirds vote) suSpend Prop. 42 in those circ=stances. 1 D k- 008 01-17-02 14:30 RECEIVED FROM: P.02 01/17/02 03:32 FAX No. ESTIMATED PROPOSITION 42 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROJECTIONS FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY RIVERSIDE 2003-2008 PROGRAM FUND PROJECTIONS This initial five year estimate includes the Govemor's Transportation Program (which funds specific project improvements as a first priority) and Proposition 42 revenue allocations. COUNTY ROADS FUNDING 2003-2008 $16,148,195.00 (Repair, improve and maintain county meads) CITY ROADS FUNDING 2003-2008 $14,698,554-00 (Repair, improve and maintain city roads) Banning $304,138.00 Beaumont $146,647.00 Blythe $262,643.00 Calimesa $91,024 00 Canyon Lake $128,043.00 Cathedral City $559,647.00 Coachella - $300,164.00 Corona $1,645,310.00 Desert Hot Springs $213,101.00 Hemet $759,674.00 Indian Wells $50,445.00 Indio $645,357.00 Lake Elsinore $380,856.00 La Quinta $329,961.00 Moreno Valley $1,836,597.00 >Vmurrieta $587,102.00 Norco $310,218.00 Palm Desert $530, 702.00 Palm Springs $549,318.00 Perris $470,717.00 Rancho Mirage $174,438.00 Riverside $3,330,533.00 San Jacinto $313,239.00 Banning $778,578.00 TOTAL $14,698,554.00 COUNTY SHARE OF STATE HIGHWAY FUNDING (STiP) 2003-2008 $68,203,257.00 (New construction, rehabilitation and service improvements on state highways, local streets and roads, and rail transit) Page 1 of 3 0,09 01-17-02 14.31 RECEIVED FROM: P.04 01/17/0-9 03:32 FAX U 05 PUBLIC TRANSIT FUNDING 2003-2008 (improve, maintain and expand operations of bus, light rail, commuter rail and special trer?sit services for the elderly and disabled.) RIVERSIDE $8,220,34$_00 2008-2028 PROGRAM FUND PROJECTIONS This twonty year estimate beginning in 2008 through 2028 displays the benefi#s of Proposition 42 after the projects included in the Governors Transportation program are funded. COUNTY ROADS FUNDING 2008-2028 $312,3971872.00 (Repair, improve and maintain county roads) CITY ROADS FUNDING 2008-2028 $2941327,268.00 (Repair, improve and maintain city roads) Banning $6, 090,124.00 Beaumont $2,936,491.00 Blythe $5,259,227.00 Calirnesa $1, 822, 695, 00 Canyon Lake $2,563,974.00 Cathedral City $11,206,517.00 Coachella $6,010,548.00 Corona $32,946,052.00 Desert Hot Springs $4,267,179.00 Hemet $15,211,872.00 Indian Wells $1,010,124.00 Indio $12.922,774.00 Lake Elsinore $7,626,394.00 La Quinta $6,607,234.00 Moreno Valley $36,775,443.ori Murrieta 11,756,262.00 Norco $6,211,868.00 Palm Desert $10,626,899.00 Palm Springs $10,999,672.00 Perris $9,425,744.00 Rancho Mirage $3,493,014.00 Riverside $66,693, 375.00 San Jacinto $6,272,366.00 Banning $151590,420.00 TOTAL $294132T268.00 COUNTY SHARE OF STATE HIGHWAY (STIP) FUNDING 2008-2028 $518,728,995,00 r� Page 2 of 3 1110 01-17-02 14:31 RECEIVED FROM: P-05 01 17/02 03:32 FAX [a o a (New construction, rehabilitation and service improvements on state highways, local streets and roads, and rail transit) PUBLIC TRANSIT FUNDING 2008-2028 (Improve, maintain and expand operations of bus, light rail, commuter rail and special transit services for the elderly and disabled.) GRAND TOTAL 2003-2028 $90,776,845.00 $ "1, 322,501,334.00 These projections reflect a consensus estimate based on input from the Califomia Transportation Commission, Califomia Department of Transportation, State Controller's office, California Transit Association, California State Association of Counties and League of California Cities. The anneal inflation rate factor utilized for the period 2008-2028 is two percent (2/). Page 3of3 Oil 01-17-62 14:31 RECEIVED FROM: P.06 Prop. 42 will help speed up highway, street and mass transit improvements. It also guarantees every city and county additional funds to repair and maintain local roads. Here's a few examples of regional projects awaiting completion,• Alameda • Extending rail service to Livermore • Widening Rte. 84 from 4 to 6 lanes from Livermore to Sunol • Westbound truck climbing lane over Altamont Pass • Adding train service across the Dumbarton Bridge Contra Costa • Extending rail service to Antioch • Speeding up work on fourth bore for Caldecott Tunnel • Expansion of 680/Route 4 interchange • Improvements to State Route 4 Fresno • Extension of Highway 180 from Highway 33 to 1-5 • Improvements to Highway 99 • Traffic improvements to and widening of Herndon Avenue • Expansion of public transit Kern • Widening and improving Highway 99 • Widening and improving State Route 58 in Bakersfield Los Angeles • Improving the San Diego Freeway (405) and the Ventura Freeway (101) interchange and travel over Sepulveda Pass • Countywide freeway improvements including 1-5, I-10, Route 14, Route 60, and U.S. 101 • Expansion of Metro Rapid Bus service • Expansion of rail service to Pasadena, East Los Angeles and West Los Angeles • Construction of a Busway in the San Fernando Valley along the Burbank/Chandler corridor Marin/Sonoma • Speeding up widening of 101 • Expansion of ferry service • New 580/101 connecting ramps Napa/Solano • Widening/improving 80/680/Route 12 interchange • Widening 680 to 6 lanes north of the Benicia Bridge • Expansion of Route 29 from Route 12 to Solano County Orange County • Fixing freeway bottlenecks on the 405 from Warner to Beach Blvd., the 55 freeway, the 5 and the 91 • Expansion of MetroLink commuter rail service by doubling existing Metrolink during peak period operations and adding new service from Fullerton to Laguna Niguel • Increasing "Bus Rapid Transit" service on Beach and Harbor Blvds. Riverside • Railroad grade separation on major streets • Improving MetroLink Service • Improvements to 1-215 • Widening of 1-15 from Temecula to Corona • Construction of a new East-West corridor between Riverside and Orange County • Interchange improvements along 1-10 in Coachella Valley • Improvement of local bus services Sacramento • Light rail from downtown to Sacramento International Airport • Improvements on Hwy. 50 and 1-80 east of downtown • Improvements to local roads and local bus service San Bernardino • Improvements to 1-10 • Widening of 1-215 between San Bernardino and Riverside • Widening of 1-15 in the Cajon Pass • Expansion of MetroLink commuter rail service San Francisco • Improvements to Doyle Dr. approach to Golden Gate Bridge • Speeding up extension of light rail service underground into Chinatown • Replacement for Transbay Terminal San Diego • Widening of 1-5 throughout the county • Widening of 1-15 from Kearney Mesa to Escondido • Rail transit expansion and improvements San Joaquin Valley • Widening and improvements to Highway 99 • Expansion of ACE commuter rail service to Bay Area • Expansion of public transit system San Luis Obispo • Widen Route 46 to four lanes from Paso Robles to Fresno San Mateo • Speeding up interchange improvements along 101, including Willow Road, University Avenue and Broadway • Widening Route 92 from 4 to 6 lanes between 101 and 280 • Speeding up electrification of Caltrain from SF to Gilroy Santa Clara Speeding up work on widening 101 from 6 to 8 lanes from Metcalf Road to Cochrane Road • Widening 880 to 8 lanes from Route 237 to 101 • Speeding up construction of BART from Warm Springs to San Jose Ventura • Widening Route 23 between Moorpark and Thousand Oaks • Widening 101 freeway from Johnson Drive in Ventura to Vineyard Avenue in Oxnard 105. �12 11/29 Cv AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 5, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: Consideration of a Sponsorship Request from the Coachella Valley Economic Partnership for International Trade Outlook 2002 RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: The Coachella Valley Economic Partnership (CVEP) is seeking sponsorship in the amount of $5,000 for their annual International Trade Outlook event. An amount of $1,000 is budgeted for this event in the City's Fiscal Year 2001-02 Annual Budget. The funds are available in Economic Development -Travel, Training & Meetings Account #101-103-637-000 (CVEP Activities). If the City Council were to approve the $5,000 funding request, an additional $4,000 may be allocated from Economic Development —Advertising Account #101-103-643-823 (Media Promotion) . CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: The City Charter allows the City "to utilize revenues from the general fund to encourage, support and promote economic development." International Trade Outlook 2002 is designed to showcase the Coachella Valley to thousands of companies throughout the United States and across the border in Mexicali, Mexico. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: On January 4, 2002, staff received a letter from CVEP requesting a $5,000 sponsorship for the 2002 International Trade and Economic Outlook Conference (Attachment 1). This year, the conference will take place at the Miramonte Resort in Indian Wells on April 28, 29 and 30, 2002. Its purpose is to bring together numerous companies, trade consulates, and political officials from both the United States and Mexico to encourage investment and economic development in the Coachella Valley. A brochure containing more details on the conference is provided as Attachment 2. Per CVEP's letter, as a $5,000 "Event Sponsor," the City of La Quinta would be entitled to the following: • Logo on all event materials/recognized sponsor of specific event • Two guests for Sponsor Dinner on Monday night • Four guests for Welcoming Reception on Sunday night • Four guests for Business Recruitment Forum on Monday • Four guests for golf tournament at the Golf Resort in Indian Wells on Tuesday • Exhibit space at the Miramonte Resort for Business Recruitment Forum on Monday "Event Supporter" ($2,500) and "Event Participant" ($500) sponsorships are also available, with entitlements as outlined in Attachment 2. In addition, staff inquired about the sponsorships of the City of Cathedral City and the City of Coachella, which have each committed a sponsorship amount of $1,500. CVEP staff informs that these cities will be entitled to the following: • One guest for Sponsor Dinner on Monday night • One guest for Welcoming Reception on Sunday night • One guest for Business Recruitment Forum on Monday • One guest for golf tournament at the Golf Resort in Indian Wells on Tuesday • Exhibit space at the Miramonte Resort for Business Recruitment Forum on Monday Last year, the City's sponsorship/participation involved hosting a lunch at the La Quinta City Hall Courtyard, being part of a bus tour of the Coachella Valley, and attending various conference activities. The total spent on the catered lunch was $2,850. In considering this year's sponsorship, the Council may elect to approve: $500 ("Event Participant") or $1,000 as budgeted in the City's Annual Budget; $1,500 as committed by Cathedral City and Coachella; $2,500 as "Event Supporter"; $5,000 ("Event Sponsor") as requested by CVEP; or an alternate amount as deemed appropriate by the City Council. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve a $500 or $1,000 sponsorship for International Trade Outlook 2002 from Economic Development -Travel, Training & Meetings Account #101- I()7 103-637-000 and authorize the City Manager to designate "guest" participants; or 2. Approve a sponsorship for International Trade Outlook 2002 in an alternate amount utilizing funds from the Media Promotion Account (#101-103-643- 823) as deemed appropriate by the City Council, and authorize the City Manager to designate "guest" participants; or 3. Do not approve a sponsorship request for International Trade Outlook 2002; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Letter from CVEP dated January 4, 2002 2. International Trade Outlook 2002 Brochure I () `LL�11 Attachment 1 Coachella Valley Economic Partnership 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 205 - Palm Desert, CA 92260 • 760/340-1575 or 1-800-596-1007 • Fax 760/340-9212 January 4, 2002 Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: REQUEST FOR SPONSORSHIP/PARTICIPATION IN 2002 INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND ECONOMIC OUTLOOK CONFERNECE APRIL 28-30. Dear Mark: The purpose of this letter is to make a formal request for the City of La Quinta to be an Event Sponsor of the 2002 International Trade and Economic Outlook Conference to be held April 28-30, 2002 here in the Coachella Valley. The Coachella Valley Economic Partnership is requesting event sponsorship in the amount of $5,000. By way of background, the Conference is designed to bring together the senior executives of Fortune 1000 companies, America's fastest growing companies (known as the Ernst & Young 650), international Maquiladora's, corporate site selection consultants, trade consulates and political officials from both Mexico and the United States to encourage investment and economic development in the Coachella Valley. This year, our invitation will go out to some 6,000 potential attendees with a target for about 125 qualified prospects to encourage investment in our region. The event will be housed at the Miramonte Resort Indian Wells (last years' event was held at the Desert Springs Marriott). As an event sponsor, you will be provided with the following: • Logo on all event materials & Recognized sponsor of specific event • 2 Guests for Sponsor Dinner on Monday Night • 4 Guests for Welcoming Reception on Sunday Night • 4 Guest for Business Recruitment Forum on Monday • 4 Guests for Private Golf Tournament at the Golf Resort at Indian Wells on Tuesday • Exhibit Space at the Miramonte Resort for Monday's Business Forum 1031 A Weiss, Mark ITO Sponsorship Letter January 4, 2002 Page 2 of 2 It is our goal that the International Trade and Economic Outlook Conference foster the relationships needed between local officials to garner desired economic investment in the Coachella Valley via business expansion and relocations. Below is a list of pre -confirmed sponsorships from other agencies/cities here in the Coachella Valley (list as of 1/4/02): Union Bank of California $10,000 City of Indian Wells* $15,000 Imperial Valley Economic Development Corporation $ 7,500 Imperial Irrigation District $ 5,000 County of Riverside EDA $ 5,000 The Gas Company $ 2,500 City of Coachella $ 1,500 City of Cathedral City $ 1,500 *Providing Golf Course, stated amount is value of sponsorship We are currently working with staff in Palm Springs, Desert Hot Springs, Rancho Mirage and Palm Desert... each of the entities were sponsors in 2001. Please let me know if you have any questions about this event as we continue planning. I can be reached at (760) 340-1575 or email at michael(&,,cvep.com Sincerely, Michael Bracken President Cc: Mayor John Pena Tom Genovese, City Manager Maria Casilla, Management Analyst I1 T 9 Aw H 1� hHI O V y ... �..► ►� 'C O a. o C L O r .O Ix .&W III o CA cd 4-a N4cl O �. 4- Cl bA °0 W " 3 O cv u $� o O O v; �_ ci a� ,� a� Q . o a. CAO Q o .0 a o w Cc i o C13 a.cn c -a C13 o ° o °cn F Q6 C, �3 o� w � a, �oA � x %%wb oA t. °O Zq �OP .=d=W vi W O c� t Q p v� > h C O j n > y U .> .� o��v 3 aaoao v 3�raoa,o �.��a04 �,---v o 0 0 o -v O o o o o o, vi `.� �w w -w w� �w w --w w� r ce c+., w, p Ed i--a C4 N Z ct ct (� d '� H '� N Z am-+ E"'' V (.L, cq3 C � w � W �Ll W = 4O C) 5 O C C y O. c, 0 73 ' 4.4 U .. rJ2 cq3 N O 00 cn CA 4-1 O N L OoCD efi 60 a) 0 0 on w - ,� v � 0 r� irn �r C w 4a O cn c13 cl,cl,r U cJ Cl 4� '� O. O C Q p 3 O w W U00p �* O a, OO , aEow NM4 Q v Coacher/a t/arlloy � Ecoriorr�►ic Partri�rshi, Helphz,-� IIIIIOZ)lC7tIZ.Pe COIIIpim ies Expal dlReloeato to The Coachella Valley. International Trade Conference and Economic Outlook Program Sunday April 28, 2002 5:00-8:00 p.m. Welcoming Reception at Miramonte Resort Indian Wells Monday April 29, 2002 8:00 a.m.-12:00 noon Seminars and presentations regarding trade opportunities along California and Mexico's NAFTA Corridor 12:00 noon Keynote Address by Mr. Richard Heckmann, former Chairman of the Board for US Filter 1:30-4:00 p.m. Roundtable Discussions on Location Incentives, NAFTA Opportunities, Labor & Education 6:00 p.m. Reception & Dinner at the Lodge at Rancho Mirage Keynote Address by Mr. Greg Renker, CEO, Guthy-Renker Tuesday April 30, 2002 7:00 a.m. Pre -Golf Breakfast at the Golf Resort at Indian Wells 8:00 a.m. Start Time for Private Golf Tournament at the Golf Resort at Indian Wells 1:00 P.M. Luncheon and Awards Invited Speakers Include: Congresswoman Mary Bono California Governor Gray Davis Baja California, Mexico Governor Eugenio Eloduy California Secretary of State Bill Jones Richard Riordan, Former Mayor of the City of Los Angeles California Technology Trade & Commerce Secretary Sergio Tagliapetra Richard Heckmann, Former Chairman of the Board for US Filter Greg Renker, President, Guthy-Renker International COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Community Services Grant Requests RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: February 5, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: The Special Project Contingency Account #101-251-663-000 has an uncommitted balance of $34,505 as of this report, as provided in Attachment 1. The total amount requested by the various organizations is $28,176.17. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the November 2, 1999 City Council meeting, the City Council approved changes to the Community Services Grant process. The first meetings of August, November, February and May have been designated for review of the grants received. At the July 17, 2001 City Council meeting, Council reviewed the funding criteria to decide application guidelines for the Fiscal Year 2001-02. No changes were implemented. Four requests have been submitted for City Council consideration as of this report: 1. The Living Desert (Attachment 2): The Living Desert provides exhibits, community events, animal care, educational programs and wildlife conservation. The Living Desert is seeking a Business Shareholder Membership from the City for $1,000. The funds will be used to further expand their education and conservation programs. The City of La Quinta has participated in this program since 1990, with a contribution of $1,000 each year. 116 2. United Cerebral Palsy (Attachment 3): The purpose of United Cerebral Palsy is to advance the independence, productivity and full citizenship of people with Cerebral Palsy and other disabilities. In addition, United Cerebral Palsy promotes the independence and social inclusion of disabled children in typical settings, increasing their abilities to utilize community service programs. United Cerebral Palsy is requesting a Community Service Grant in the amount of $1,250. The funds are to be used to provide necessary supplies for the annual " Easter Egg Hunt" for disabled children and their families in the Coachella Valley. The Egg Hunt will serve more than 400 participants. 3. Riverside County C.A.R.E. Program (Attachment 4): The C.A.R.E. (Curtailing Abuse Related to the Elderly) Program helps elders and dependent adults who are victims of consumer fraud to recover their losses and train those that come in contact with seniors (i.e., bankers, service providers, medical staff, care givers), to recognize and report elder abuse. The Riverside County C.A.R.E. Program is seeking $6,000 in grant funding to hold an intense training seminar. The seminar will train law enforcement officers, deputy district attorneys, adult protective service workers and senior service providers on methods of recognizing and documenting suspected elder abuse. The training will include preparing a successful investigation regarding elder abuse cases. The training will cover the proper technique for warrants, profiling, interviewing, court orders, working with dependent adults and protection issues. The funds will be used to pay for training materials and printing costs. Matching funds are estimated to be received by means of seminar registration fees. C.A.R.E. will charge $175.00 for the two-day seminar. The registration fee will cover the cost of meals for the participants. Community grants and donations will cover the remaining costs of the training. Conference registration fees are expected to generate $30,625 (175 participants). The Riverside County C.A.R.E. Program has received Community Service Grant funds of $1,000 in fiscal year 1999-00 and $2,000 in fiscal year 2000-01. 4. La Quinta High School Band Boosters (Attachment 5): The La Quinta High School Band Boosters promote and support the interests and activities of the La Quinta High School Blackhawk Brigade, including the Marching S:\CommunitY Services\CCReports\CC.177.Community Services Grant 14 k2 Requests.wpd Band, Concert Band, Percussion Band, Jazz Band, Color Guard and Winter Drum Line. The La Quinta High School Band Boosters are requesting a Community Service Grant in the amount of $5,000. Funds are to be used for expenses such as transportation, instruments and repairs, uniform up keep, food and travel expenses for several upcoming local and out of town performances. A source of matching funds specifically for this request has not been identified by the La Quinta High School Band Boosters. They have submitted their current fund balance as a matching fund source. The La Quinta High School Band Boosters have received funding from Community Service Grants in the amounts of $7,320 in Fiscal Year 1996-97 for band uniforms and $2,499 in Fiscal Year 1999-2000 for general band expenses. 5. Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District (Attachment 6): As a condition to receiving Proposition 12 funds (Safe Neighborhoods and Parks Bond Act), the City and the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District (CVRPD) were to agree upon a percentage of funds which would be allocated to CVRPD from the City's proposition 12 apportionment. On December 5, 2000, the City adopted Resolution 2000-163 allocating 20% of the City's portion of Proposition 12 funds to CVRPD for capital improvements to the Frances Hack La Quinta Community Park (Frances Hack Park). That amount is approximately $53,000. CVRPD then began the design phase for the Frances Hack Park improvements. The improvements to be included as part of the project include redesigning the ball fields and park, and remodeling the existing community center. On July 11, 2001, the CVRPD Board of Directors approved the final plans for the Frances Hack Park project. On August 7, 2001, CVRPD presented the park concept for City Council review. At that time, CVRPD did not request additional funding from the City for the park project. Since August 7, 2001, CVRPD has altered the plans for the community center. In the original plan, the existing exterior of the community center was to be enhanced with a new facade and art work. The new plans call for the existing community center to be demolished and a larger community center built in the same location with an enhanced streetscape. Also included in the new plan is a remodeled restroom facility with an additional snack bar. A park site plan and building elevations are provided S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.177.Community Services Grant,' Requests.wpd '' v as Attachment 6. The Building and Safety Department, Public Works Department and Community Development Department fees associated with the demolition and rebuilding of the community center and remodeling of the restroom facility are provided in the following table: Community Center Restroom Facility Total Building Permits $10,438.66 $1,937.51 $12,376.17 Public Works Permits $1,000 $1,000 Community Development Fees Village Use Permit $1,000 Environmental Assessment $550 $1,550 Total Fees $12,438.66 $2,487.51 $14,926.17 CVRPD is requesting that the City of La Quinta provide financial assistance to cover the required fees associated with the construction of the buildings at Frances Hack Park. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Authorize Community Services Grant request(s) as deemed appropriate by the City Council; or 2. Do not authorize a Community Services Grant request from: The Living Desert and/or United Cerebral Palsy and/or Riverside County C.A.R.E. Program and/or La Quinta High School Band Boosters and/or Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District or; 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.177.Community Services Grant'-' Requests.wpd spectf ully submitted, itz, Community Services Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. 2001-02 Special Project Contingency Account Balance 2. Business Shareholder Membership Letter/Application from The Living Desert 3. Community Service Grant Request from United Cerebral Palsy 4. Community Service Grant Request from the Riverside County C.A.R.E. Program 5. Community Service Grant Request from the La Quinta High School Band Boosters 6. Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District- Frances Hack Park Permit Fees S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.177.Community Services Grant Requests.wpd ATTACHMENT 1 Community Services Grant Program 101-251-663-000 Fiscal Year 2001-02 Beginning Balance $55,000 03-Jul-02 Vets Express, Transportation Costs $2,000 Balance $53,000 07-Aug-01 Riverside Sheriffs Pistol Team $1,500 Meals on Wheels $2,300 La Quinta Arts Association $4,000 Lion's Club $1,000 Soroptimist Club $4,070 Balance $40,130 06-Nov-01 La Quinta High Junior ROTC $2,000 Veteran's of Foreign Wars $1,125 La Quinta High Cheerleaders $2,500 Balance $34,505 VV� ATTACHMENT 2 THE LIVING DESERT 47-900 PORTOLA AVENUE PALM DESERT, CA 92260 (760)-346-5694 FAX (760)-568-9685 October 31, 2001 BOARD OF TRUSTEES John L. Farley, Jr.* Chairman City of La Quinta Wayne Connor* Vice Chairman Attn: Dodie Horvitz Planning PO Box 1509 E. Eugene Yeager* Vice Chairman La Quinta, CA 92253-1504 Development I R. Laurence Spicer* Vice Chairman Finance Dear Ms. Horvitz, Mrs. Mary Jane Jenkins* Vice Chairman Special Events On behalf of Karen Sausman, President/CEO, the Board of Trustees and W. Curt Ealy Legal Counsel the staff of The Living Desert, thank you for your support in these past Mrs. Lawrence A. Cone Secretary years as a Business Shareholder. It is your support that has enabled The John T. Schware* Treasurer Living Desert to continue to expand our education and conservation Karen Sausman ro amS. Our newest addition is Vill eWaTuTu, an authentic replica of President/CEO P Assistant Secretary a village found in Northeast Africa, and we are very excited about the new 18,000 sq. ft. Veterinary and Research Center which will be opening in Mrs. Peggy Bernthal January 2002. We have expanded our marketing and public relations Charles L. Callander department and we are now recognized as one of the top attractions in the Buford Crites Coachella Valley. Mrs. Daphne De Martino Mrs. Barbara Filiatreaux DennisScottHaugThe Living Desert enjoys an exceptional reputation for our exhibits, Mrs. H. Earl Hoover community events, animal care, educational programs and wildlife Mrs. Sis Jackson Mrs. Ruth Kramer conservation. Our Business and Corporate Members receive customized Mrs. Susan McCormick recognition seen by over 250,000 visitors annually. Your renewal creates a Mrs. William G. Mitsch, Jr. Randy Patton partnership with The Living Desert that has direct local as well as global Mrs. Tisha Shaski impact. Mrs. B.J. Skilling Sherman A. Smith Mrs. Barbara Spencer Mrs. George B. Storer please take a moment to look through the enclosed materials, which William Tennity describes our Membership Program, but also many of our new projects and Mrs. Frederick G. Wacker, Jr. Mrs. Dorothy L. Weber programs. Please call me if you would like to arrange a personal riding Lowell Weeks tour of our grounds to preview the projects you will help support. We invite Mrs. Peggy Fouke Wortz Mrs. Carol Wright you to renew your valued membership with The Living Desert. HONORARY BOARD Again, thank you and I look forward to hearing from you. President Gerald R. Ford Mrs. Betty Ford Bob Hope Mrs. Dolores Hope Mrs. Ruth ApplegarthNeil "Scotty" Dunlop Mrs. Helenn Dengler gler tty p Stanley A. Rosin Director of Sales Lloyd P. Tevis, Jr. ND/Pj JL j. ' Executive Committee �'� THE LIVING DESERT 47-900 PORTOLA Av'ENUE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260-6I56 City of La Quinta Attn: Dodie Horvitz PO Box 1509 La Quinta, CA 92253-1504 To)A)'s DATE: 10/31/01 MEMBER SINCE: 2/28/91 MEMBER EXPIRATION: 12/31/01 Tl-PE OF MEMBERSHIP Business Shareholder IS THE INFORMATION ABOVE CORRECT? Please make name and address corrections on this form. Membership fees over $ 50 are tax deductible, as provided by law. BENEFITS OF ANNUAL BUSINESS & CORPO- RATE MEMBERSHIP INCLUDE: it, Recognition as a con- cerned community member, actively involved in desert education and conservation. iti Sot (c) (3) tax deduction benefits iti Complimentary guest passes i o% discount in the Tortoise Shelf Giftshop and Palo Verde Garden Center 02 iti Invita- tions to "Members Only" events Invitation to the our annual "Corpo- rate Party" Free or reduced admission to participating zoos, aquariums and gar- dens in the United States. V* MEMBERSHIP CATEGORIES ❑ Business Partners $ 2 50 ❑ Business Investor $ 500 ❑ Business Shareholders $ I,000 ❑ Corporate Entrepreneur ❖ $2,500 ❑ Corporate Advocate ❖ $ 5,000 ❑ Corporate Guardian ❖ $ I0,000 ❑ Corporate Stewardship ❖ $25,000 PAYABLE TO THE LIVING DESERT ❑ (circle one) AmERICAN EXPRESS MASTERCARD DISCOVER VISA DINERS CLUB �L-1❑�! JI�JL—J�uU�L-1�� CAR) No. U l SIGNATURE EXP. DATE: ATTACHMENT 3 ��v..., r s P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLS TAMPICO (760) 7 7 7 - 7 0 0 0 LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 FAX (760) 777-7101 COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT 3L GUIDELINES The City of La Quinta offers the Community Services Grant program to recognized nonprofit organizations that benefit the residents of La Quinta. Priority for funding is granted to organizations that directly benefit La Quinta residents, second consideration is given to organizations that indirectly affect the quality of life for the residents of La Quinta. Individuals are not eligible for funding through the Community Services Grant program. Organizations that receive Community Development Block Grants from the City of La Quinta during the same fiscal year are not eligible for funding through the Community Services Grant program. Completed grant applications will be considered by the La Quinta City Council at the first Council meetings of August, November, February and May of each fiscal year. Applications are due three weeks before the scheduled City Council meeting. Once the application is placed on the agenda for City Council consideration, the organization will be notified of the date of the meeting for consideration. Applications must be typed. Incomplete applications will be returned to the applicant. Organizations requesting "seed" money are required to obtain matching funds from other sources in the same fiscal year before Community Services Grant funds will be released. Organizations requesting more than $2,499 are required to obtain matching funds from other sources in the same fiscal year. The City Council may authorize the release of up to $2,499 while matching . funds are being secured by the organization. For more information on the Community Services Grant program, please contact the Community Services Department at 760-777-7032. 0000 0 0 L0,11 INCOMRATM 191Q OF 1' CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT FISCAL YEAR 01-02 Name of Organization: lot Amount Requested: T 7. Contact Person: "a N KW ER, Mailing Address: 3 S— 3 2 S` )#+-re O a Lm ID4. City: 0 a--Fff o y �L C-L-11L-4 State: C � Zip Code: � Z Z3 V- Phone No.: 2 4c, o - 3 2 501(c)3 Taxpayer I.D. Number: `1/S Date Submitted: % — // — o Z-- Applications will receive consideration without discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin or disability. ma`s fl COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT APPLICATION (Must be typed) 1. What is the overall purpose or goal of your organization? 7-0 Q d v a w Ce /J CJP-0?:6 -N �-.. ea& ol, en yr Ic ems 17-A Pq2-s��c� a�%r 2. How long has your organization been in existence? 1lYears _I Mont[K 3. Describe in general the activities or services of your organization: 99 L 0-1 e AJ G .-�5-- 4. How many people dogs your organization currently serve? L se.�ivG No. of Youth0 No. of Adults d No. of Seniors 0 5. How many people do you intend to serve during this Fiscal Year? No. of Youth ,a No. of Adults o No. of Seniors O 6. How many people served this Fiscal Year will be La Quinta residents? No. of Youth 30 No. of Adults 6 No. of Seniors � 7. How many paid employees/volunteers does your organization employ? Full time employees Part time employees 2S3 Volunteers 20 8. Describe how your organization is managed and governed. BdcL^A o-& DI► eCroPs 9. Please provide information on your Executive Board members or contact person: Name Title Home Address Phone s111EC T 10. What is your annual schedule of events, and during what months does your organization operate?--12 0-1e,vT-H.-v — e SSrc Ue Gi e 3--41- - E3 a - - ti o,y Ma.4 - 6� e 477q ma's d e 11. Do you charge admission, membership fee, dues, etc.? _ Yes L,.-'No If yes, please describe: 12. What are your other sources of revenue for this funding year? Source A- rvT� Amount (TR R4N CA /%1 k a cxe, si D o d A46� CLa Sstc 3, oo v Total Needed $ 1 Z5-6 . o d Total Received $ Balance $ V . V 13. Amount of money requested from the City of La Quinta? $ QQ 14. Has your organization been funded by the City of La Quinta previously? Yes No If yes, when Amount received 15. Please provide the name and address of the bank in which the organization's funds are kept: R 2 L,L L �-L NCGy / �� D GaJ �/ f I/ JLT 1Gt /1� 1==Cj7• / 2� 16. Please provide the name and title of those individuals authorized to sign on the organization's account (must provide at least two individuals): Name: Title: Pig QS tc�6.1 �C•cc c-�- ?^iye. �t 17. Please provide, as an attachment, copies of the last three months bank statements as well as the last year's December bank statement of the organization's checking and savings account. 18. Need Statement. Clearly and plainly state the specific, detailed reason or need for the requested funds and how these funds will be used, if awarded. To �QcesSa a ru ti �a-L Fa S.T � 6:a ffCC ti7� d1SQ C o c<--L e-LL.a. L/a L L.e- � 19. Goal Statement. Indicate who will benefit from the use of these funds, and how they will benefit. cc r <-TQ'7C-J IA.) o ism. lam( o sG L S K t L.L. r 4 '7'e - Atta A a co of our Program Operating Budget for the current year. 20. PY Y 9 P 9 9 21. Non-profit organizations must attach a copy of the organization's current IRS Form 990. UCP UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF THE INLAND EMPIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mr. Edward M. Atwood, Jr. 68-068 Kyle Road Cathedral City, CA 92234 Tel: (760) 321-5750 Fax: (760) 321-4186 Yvonne Atwood 45-420 Ceilito Drive Indian Wells, CA 92210 Tel: (760) 862-9052 Fax: (760) 3214186 Billy Erickson 46-177 Hwy 74, #11 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Tel: (760) 836-0456 Fax: (760) 742-3022 Roger M. Alexander 24 Mission Palms West Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Tel: (760) 202-7252 Fax: (760) 202-7543 Fran Foster P.O.Box 2887 Palm Springs, CA 92263 Home: (760) 323-9867 Bus: (760) 320-8977 Fax: (760) 320-9712 UCP DJ PHONE LIST ' 260L Members Lisa Manning 30-206 Avenida Alvera Cathedral City, CA 92234 Tel: (760) 321-2681 Fax: Same Bob Byfield 75-365 St. Andrews Court Indian Wells, CA 92210 Tel: (760) 7734931 Fax: (760) 836-0811 Bob Byfield (2od. Address) 6477 N. LeRoy Avenue Lincolnwood, IL 60712 Tel: (847) 674-0539 Fax:1847) 674-0598 Honorary: Pamela Bouton 43-820 San Ysidro Circle Palm Desert, CA 92260 Tel: (760) 776-9208 Fax: None Listed Roy Dean Burton . 77682 Country Club Dr. Suite G2 Palm Desert, CA 92211 Bus: (760) 345-9934 Fax: (760) 345-3086 Roy Dean Burton 2208 Blando Rd. Palm Springs, CA 92262 Home: (760) 322-3946 Fax: (760) 320-8123 (- m D (n m En m m X m U� m Ln 0 m o �o :3" CD iZO 30 CD CD -j c N CD c � N � D =to = CD QN CD ;rjl Z m %0 NI0 Cm ooC�• a°Dri 3aa$ r= CD r sv U) .+ OD cn OD InIJ�' ,w-► -j m N(TN m o -< -v �n %n 00 < :rrCo- u rrl0 C.U) V C n A) N Ca O CD w W W N , w n 7� m A. CD r. A d 0 N z o o-oo-o 0 0 0 g v CD ? r. c cn W -c �nO°�,3 0 U) O� CL - - CD CD -• c CD 3Dm 00,+ ► 0 OO cn CnCDD G m a ccc CD m c NU) CD CD O r+ ID N 0 % rQ o- 0 � O Oc C w 00 w �•! �p In _ ro N VI W -4 G o � � OD w -W o 4;r v 3 v z CND —0 (n c� r D 0 w N w O O w W O W O JrN 0) � ro wrn N .� o c ommwmo r+ n .a .a X X 3O0mmcD CD ��x x'< SUWCDCD-n zEr03 3 c O CD CD -o 'a CD<CD��<. o � ucn CDcQ CD Q r` cn CD �c a cn O 'O O 0 O N C 3 00 xr m N Cp \ W O aD O co m oWOC >T-nz= -4 C,3 m vvmv= n-Ir-m- rma;= .0zrn_ �Dv�= 0 9 av'D-p= camp>_= Ncnr^vri= �m -G� 4- O w = C� m X C 0 m cn m m C m N O cn co n co O co cn c c sm w 00 w 00 CD Ln ul O N W - N cn -< M-i o� mC -G tDC :*Z A -400.ccn O m�a U) r '� O z 3 C ii a 0 h-+ O o°':E Pr( n D H <. ,� 3 o '� m m � E (D m N cc m N -.0 a m r. c `- (D oo0 JU tD X U)m C A ? SO 0 m m H A Q r .+ (D U. 0 =r n N 0, 7 m 0 SAD a-i a CD 3 30 .•: o _. =r- 0 CD Cfl. m Q = W ,0 1 N f N �D 3 cD .0 :A 0 ,0 ,Z 00 o DO 0 � CD 30 (D c ao� D = °D m N to (D N 3 CD 7 rt V,VOCD -4 < Oo • O aQa m a w Z m (DDa=o �C.aroov0) U) "0 Q3am mpc 3.a�viN w (D O 0� (D n.O -, m ••► Ol WQo�iI NCNfl�—�3ao � X� W CD o n 0 CD r. a Do r* S(D c CD N cn I O w 0 -A O 47 a% w O w C w co O .p N = m -' O P -P -4 w N -4 -+ w 0 km co W —+ W ao m W 0A N m A c 1 Z E o0 _ H e�t N W SI B O H � ]• rt 9+ CD ct O 1 I a I0 m U) C 000MM 3ooX1= CD X�< (D aax a ,yIUCDCD -, o0CC-0-� �► -+ r-* -+ a ;U 2 — -n O CD < � c CQ -aa.�cD�< O�CDCDa-0: -I-► U N tD CD a .� = CL cn o. U) r r O-A N tr Vt Oo O� O ON co OD O R N � N �_ t0 N 0 Vet � -cr (A N co C V7 N Vi 00 a a t nWOC= 00Mo- a�zn= I-m�m= 70_ �"ao�= rm _ nc��= (CO K) cn Jca = 1 r �m = O CA) CA) � O 0 o?io M mC o4; y O oz ma CL CA n mU'� -in co e r m 0 a C v m o H 3 0 o � jo m W � O O ►�+ y O N O Mom+ 46 zobC co 0o vCOC a cn o m0-. 2 — w w w r- r N ON ^ 7 0 ,< n Mom+ a-&s cn 00 "'' J 0o m Ul fD O 0 N W v All. 1 �IU :o-1 0 13 + 0 °m— �o o�� r N D En o En m m m m= M 7 m �. m LO mZr o m 0. N� Do Co :n �► S y m w 0 7 � ? C C. O �0 0 CC Q c- M� 3�N �3� mar. Uch m �► y _< M—.� N N y m O t/� O �rqwq rob U co O V7 V1 OD � tD -4Nt < un 6 . • m O a a c z aCL m Z CD vmcnr (DU?O OOKMKOG OO a •r'oC.GCpOtjIIi N -p =9�c'c (Dp'c=-.toMw?_ C O � pjd�I. C -(DEC•= < O 0 -* � 0 0 -0. -%< < 0 < = = cn c (D�c N(n�'n0 tD M CD O C cD CD cn cn N CD �. w 0 ut —+ w O W W _+ w 00 W W lJ7 O� O� W V7 m ..A ..+ O -I -' OD o w O% N N w N co OD W V1�p N-;r G = 03 w O -tr N -4 0 W Olt N n v W "" as 3o0xX= X<< a �M.X CDmm(D(D -n .� P.* P-*Q o (CD <" Cc -aa�CD=�. OCmCDU)a (n (D CD Q .. a N n. N v w N OD m -A co O O.-4I w i N -A O ON .M Do N -cr ' V1 -4 C% V1 V10 O � N N -� 1 0 .o ocaOc_ o mom'=m= vvmv= >--I-IZm- cn t a t-ma�.: 3 n'DZm= d �rmy= avo-�_ Faa= N r_ N cn cn _ fbm y 0 o� 0CD io y O 0 C l� � ?1 O W.0 • O Z Oc ma 7 n w acnZ :e -..I o O r r. m cn C M v < 3 m c p 3 c O O N cZi� W 0 0 7 z�< c c Z=�os N1 m . (7 -j tA N O r = = ya< v N w n-<n N ate? N �O cm m• O N W R MOM4 ��A n 0 y Page: 1 UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY DEPARTMENT STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES -HISTORICAL AND BUDGET DEPT 6 - AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 Current Month Current Month Year to Date Year to Date Variance Actual Budget Actual Budget REVENUES CONTRIBUTIONS -UNRESTRICTED $ 0.00 $ 500.00 $ 302.50 $ 6,000.00 <5,697.50> CONTRIBUTIONS -RESTRICTED 0.00 250.00 0.00 3,000.00 <3,000.00> CONTRIBUTIONS -CORPORATE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CONTRIBUTIONS-UW/CFC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 THRIFT STORE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CANISTERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GOLF TOURNAMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SPECIAL EVENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GRANTS 0.00 83.37 382.50 1,000.00 <617.50> INTEREST & DIVIDENDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 0.00 166.63 0.00 2,000.00 <2,000.00> INLAND REGIONAL CENTER 2,524.50 4,533.37 6606.60 54,400.00 11,606.60 TUITION 0.00 0.00 262.50 0.00 262.50 UNREALIZED GAIN(LOSS) INVEST. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL REVENUES 2,524.50 5,533.37 66,954.10 66,400.00 554.10 EXPENSES SALARIES & WAGES 2,462.50 3,750.00 51,016.85 45,000.00 6,016.85 PAYROLL TAXES 220.44 375.00 4,949.32 4,500.00 449.32 FRINGE BENEFITS 0.00 83.37 0.00 1,000.00 <1,000.00> ''ORKER-S COMPENSATION INS 22.94 41.63 497.15 500.00 <2.85> ROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12.48 16.63 125.40 200.00 <74.60> ACCOUNTING 175.00 0.00 681.25 0.00 681.25 AUDIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INSURANCE 0.00 83.37 930.80 1,000.00 <69.20> CONTRACTORS 0.00 83.37 0.00 1,000.00 <1,000.00> DEPRECIATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OCCUPANCY 35.50 41.63 177.50 500.00 <322.50> UTILITIES 96.05 0.00 381.89 0.00 381.89 FUNDRAISING EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OFFICE EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 41.63 740.73 500.00 240.73 TELEPHONE 85.34 8.37 763.93 100.00 663.93 POSTAGE 0.00 8.37 79.25 100.00 <20.75> PRINTING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 24.00 125.00 688.75 1,500.00 <811.25> MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 243.93 291.63 2,927.36 3,500.00 <572.64> CONFERENCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MEETINGS 0.00 41.63 0.00 500.00 <500.00> SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AFTER SCHOOL EXPENSES 3.87 541.63 8,264.89 6,500.00 11764.89 ASSISTANCE TO INDIVIDUALS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PUBLIC RELATIONS/INFORMATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ADVERTISING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHILDRENS SPECIAL EVENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GOLF TOURNAMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 STAFF TRAINING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 'ATIONAL SHARES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 STATE SHARES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INTEREST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EDUCATIONAL SUPPLY/EQUIPMEN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEE ACCOUNTANT'S COMPILATION REPORT r- �, UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY DEPARTMENT STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES -HISTORICAL AND BUDGET DEPT 6 - AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 Cun-ent Month Cun•ent Month Year to Date Year to Date Actual Budget Actual Budget TOTAL EXPENSES 11 107 AC c c1)12 1)4 '71 114 m A4 Ann nn CHANGE IN NET ASSETS $ <857.55> $ 0.11 $ <5,270.97> $ 41 SEE ACCOUNTANT'S COMPILATION REPORT �A Page: 2 Variance 5,825.07 -c 11-7n n7� t 4— 2 S P ,� Page: I UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY DEPARTMENT STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES -HISTORICAL AND BUDGET DEPT 8 - LITTLE BRIDGES PROGRAM FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 Current Month Current Month Year to Date Year to Date Variance Actual Budget Actual Budget REVENUES CONTRIBUTIONS -UNRESTRICTED $ 0.00 $ 83.37 $ 1,026.00 $ 1,000.00 26.00 CONTRIBUTIONS -RESTRICTED 0.00 1,666.63 3,789.50 2000.00 <16,210.50> CONTRIBUTIONS -CORPORATE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CONTRIBUTIONS-UW/CFC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 THRIFT STORE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CANISTERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GOLF TOURNAMENT 0.00 0.00 101,606.32 75,000.00 26,606.32 SPECIAL EVENTS 0.00 166.63 0.00 2,000.00 <2,000.00> GRANTS 0.00 625.00 0.00 7,500.00 <7,500.00> INTEREST & DIVIDENDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INLAND REGIONAL CENTER 0.00 9,437.50 25,000.00 113,250.00 <88,250.00> TUITION 102.50 0.00 282.50 0.00 282.50 UNREALIZED GAIN(LOSS) INVEST. <1,422.00> 0.00 <4,793.28> 0.00 <4,793.28> TOTAL REVENUES <11,319.50> 11,979.13 126,911.04 218,750.00 <91,838.96> EXPENSES SALARIES & WAGES 4,238.80 8,250.00 51,544.50 99,000.00 <47,455.50> PAYROLL TAXES 364.14 825.00 4,712.73 9,900.00 <5,187.27> FRINGE BENEFITS 0.00 400.00 0.00 - 4,800.00 <4,800.00> CITORKERS COMPENSATION INS 48.93 100.00 471.51 1,200.00 <728.49> :OFESSIONAL SERVICES 4.80 0.00 833.62 0.00 833.62 ACCOUNTING 175.00 0.00 681.25 0.00 681.25 AUDIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 1,154.12 0.00 1,154.12 CONTRACTORS 0.00 83.37 0.00 1,000.00 <1,000.00> DEPRECIATION 703.64 0.00 703.64 0.00 703.64 OCCUPANCY 1,395.50 500.00 11,890.50 6,000.00 5,890.50 UTILITIES 144.08 83.37 491.10 1,000.00 <508.90> FUNDRAISING EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OFFICE EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 330.44 0.00 330.44 SUPPLIES 0.00 41.63 7,667.72 500.00 7,167.72 TELEPHONE 85.36 0.00 747.25 0.00 747.25 POSTAGE 68.40 0.00 373.13 0.00 373.13 PRINTING 49.00 166.63 2,147.77 2,000.00 147.77 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 0.00 0.00 44.37 0.00 44.37 REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 120.00 166.63 2,210.71 2,000.00 210.71 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 29.48 0.00 101.65 0.00 101.65 CONFERENCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MEETINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AFTER SCHOOL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ASSISTANCE TO INDIVIDUALS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PUBLIC RELATIONS/INFORMATION 0.00 41.63 141,889.95 500.00 14,389.95 ADVERTISING 0.00 0.00 568.53 0.00 568.53 CHILDRENS SPECIAL EVENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GOLF TOURNAMENT 3,333.33 0.00 78,852.88 45,000.00 33,852.88 STAFF TRAINING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 'ATIONAL SHARES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TATE SHARES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INTEREST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 569.29 0.00 569.29 EDUCATIONAL SUPPLY/EQUIPMEN 0.00 0.00 6,345.88 0.00 6,345.88 CONTINGENCY 0.00 1,320.85 0.00 45,850.00 <45,850�0' SEE ACCOUNTANT'S COMPILATION REPORT UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY Page: 2 DEPARTMENT STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES -HISTORICAL AND BUDGET DEPT 8 - LITTLE BRIDGES PROGRAM FOR TIME TWELVE MONTHS ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 Current Month Current Month Year to Date Year to Date Variance Actual Budget Actual Budget TOTAL EXPENSES 10,760.46 11,979.11 187,332.54 218,750.00 <31,417.46> CHANGE IN NET ASSETS $ <12,079.96> $ 0.02 $ <60,421.50> $ 0.00 <6%421.50> 13k) SEE ACCOUNTANT'S COMPILATION REPORT aNsl poaaM TT9%y *•0A r%wr_M►rsl Dal nv of 34-Vi.LoIJj J`rP' '' Reoonaliittbn of �� per u Raoonol>•tton of Ravonw ppe�rr Auditeed innsnciel Stattements with 9xp09e4 pv+' 1=inwwW Stabmnts with Awenue per RGture (See Spwft Inarudoft page 24.3 Rewrin a Total revenue, gains, and ollher support • eXpenaes and losses per audted 7881921 1 0� 5 8 2 0 per eL d bd ilnand+s! Skiemenb ......... ► enanclal atatsamarft..................... ► a vvyy b Amount Included on Iine abut not on b Amounts IncM�ded on line a but not on line 12, Form w0: 1 AGO: :4?:dSP. ,. WH♦• A�.\•.+.Y V t• , , '-+!��+';ad4.: •. •;:M4\.K}•i•:.::.;{ �Y,•:l•:1: Ine 1T Form 990 .y�.{••,tt K.•h',•:•,•p IMFYi.:hi.��qq '{. •,;•:.'.N (1) Not unroalino gra►ina i., ti.S..:• i N4 ...1.�{':\. o1 tp0ilitie6....: 1 on Investments .... i 3 0 1 and ua I�p 1j: �, , . ::{!dS•^ .. 1• N'VNM'IYtp.N�H ``ff Donated services ,w�+!�4a4.1.,y�'.I�rP.. w.. •�: {;�, .• (2) yW •,•Y. ,Y�.•a.a', ••`•? t'•> •N. Prior wC1�ustrnentS 1''1�''�' �''^>'� �•':M�1!WN•'�',j.1:: }I 4N'•d4NIvM•w•.i•: and use Of laGllltles .. i yi ':• MP: ,, ' ,K ,• •� . •.. �pfOt �On • , • _ ''.�`�#x�•�,�• ` �� ' .: . cov (3) Reeries d prior year grants ........ 1 ........ Y Losses reported on (19) Ot?W (Specify): •� " " ,'" , Ins 20. Form 090 . d'a (4) Other (speCiiy): x - r:/:t•• •a• •.. • .. . ► 4 31071 Add amounts On Ines (1) through (4) .. • .. Add amounts on Ins (1) WOUI r+ (4) ....... ► b 788 9 C uns a minus line b ...... ,,,,,,,,,,,,, ► c 1, 055 159 '.• c Lineamirnsnneb ...•••> ► e .............. ,,.. y •' '• ».; ti^ f�.•�'�. ifs ..,..Ndt•i•>f d included on In* 1 Z Form aie0 but Ou Mi >< Pia .: ,.: • �K'tti °'.:V '?V n 1 i, d Amounts Included olira : r ;:, �, e ««:r. •'a:.;; 990 but on Ins a::;.. not an ins e• 1 Investment >,,:' ;. :•>,�.,,'.' 4w •q"..,ttw�i.yyoyyt,' ,,i'>: N X, G, S••SM3:T• ' :•'tS;M:ddd�' ; fig d ' :'a• Ni .4i•:•N• ',•. s• M.M`>.., ,.!:'~ Form not . ')a.t•¢�¢ ,.,: 't''r •,it:•'S',:' \MV +t:ii.}Y.:•i:•:�\?4ii\I%i.:�. 1 1• dd.d•' i :M:i not •Y:•iN•rrll•• <•::. .: Y..�w.;l:. 1 investment �T�"�_— ( / not included on��r line ab. Form 990 ;. ,r*►n,�: included on linedb, '.. FOrm 0 ........ • . 1 `,S�„'"�, Hr "rP,.�4.d,d •...�. N:.irt..4•4....r '..4.{<,«,,, s�-y•��,; ,;:<::<.»' •a�, 2(2) Other (specify); }W.{''q�ryNO:,t•1,•a,'•,1i: t• >3Ps '' {FY'�.' `:\ t :t. :4:k: dY. �1OthW ( '__ ' iw:+H'•>itS v•::lk:::•••1•ti«n7W.:: �\v''aieG::�•wF � :i+::...'�..aI..:y:. '' i:..`..�..i.:.<.n:'..:.,...�...,.4:.. i.'• t''�j ,ji•rwVi.)\'♦:ti•}: ) ,� ••,•Nr,:;.::.. : :.•.dY. %4N S K S . Add amounb on lines (1) and (2) • . • • • • • • • • ► d Add amounts on lines (1) and lid) ..... , .. ► d a Total revenue per Ins 12, Form 9W a Mee c Memo per In• 17, Form M 788,921 inv C plus tined .............. ►• 1 0 5 5 15 9 a urn d ...... . a 1'<Rt Mr9keters. TMAIM&A. end Key EMp1gyC6f (usz earn ons w+v, p 91•,....,...�,-..�.. 76 Did any oftw. 4F*CW, trustee, or key employee Moen+• aggrepav CQMipM MUgJ1j Lr 111%n v WNW . - •--•--- - - - - - - Yea W No and sY reacted arganl=atlons, of which more than $10A00 was provided by the related aCanlmtions?.......... I .......... i • 0 if'Y•s; attach wot WO - $ee Spedtic Instructions on Pepe 26. 0—M no (11011l 13 ,e.i +wmasorem United Cerebral Paley of 44-t}110113 room a r Irt%fr IS Sao a InstUdons on a 2a. YeaV N0, 71111 Did I* Orpani>ation eMWP In Any aCWty not >xatil4ve1y MpO(Wi to the 1W if "yN"auch a detailed deetxlpboft of» x Mh 01v / ......... . . . . . . • ... . . . . . . . . • , I ...... , . a I b . 1 .. • , 1 ...... 1 .. , 1 . , , . . . . .. . . . ..... , 0 „ . .. ... a I I a I , . • . 77 Were any funs made in the orpanWO9 or gow rkv docurnents but not nWo led to the IRS? • . • • • • • ............ ....... • . . M "Yes," stlach a oontormed oOpY of the duMm. �• �;�a�• ;,r,; 72 is Old the organisation Fm* unrelated bUsIneoe Woes Income of $1.000 or more during the year emwed by this return? ...... • • • • • .. b If "Yes" has R filed a tax return on POM OWT for this year? .............................. ................ lab AIN N A 71 Was then a 1 uidalion, dtssoluti0A. termination, or substantW contraction aurinq the Year?"»Y If "Va. aNlOh a stalefflent • . . . . . .. . . . .... • ............ • .... • .. . ......................... • , • , . .� ,. �... see is the orgeniratlon related (other than by association with a sbdr*ide ar nationwide organlsdti0m) through Common membership, governing bodies. Irustaas, ofllasrs, site, tO any other exempt or none xempi Organization? .. • • . • . • • ..... • . , , . b if "yes; er+ter the name of the organization ► NIA and Check whether It A El exempt QR D nONUMPt a, s Enter tn* amount of pdideW expendUres. dtreot or Indirect, as desaibed in the In*uottorr for one 81 15181 ... l0a X csvti •u.��!.as �u.:... b Did the orpantzalon file Farm 11WPM for this y*ar?............................................................. _._ 62a Did ft arganixstion roe" donated services or the use Of materials, equipment, or faditise at no Charge or at substantially ... � Is" than to rentatvrkto? ............................................................................• b If "yes," ycu nay In&&te tI`+e value of two hams hem. Do not include this amount as revenue In ebb > »«• Part I or as an vogrse In Part II. (30 instructions tar r*porting In tart 111.) ............ • ..........I as a Old the orpanlralon oarrig* with ft pvbik Inspection requirements for returns and eotenlption applkayons7 .. • .. • . • ............ aaa b Did the organletalon cam* with the dteoiowre rsquiroments relafinp to quid pro quo oontrbutions?.............. • . ......... gab s4 s Did the organization sdldt any contributions or gift that were not tax deductible? ........ • ................... • ........... oft b 11 "Yea," did the prpotnlation InolUde with every soilodation an OWNS statement ftt iuoh Contributions or gifts were not .. . i4b • tax deduolble? .......................... ..............•.., ..................... .,.... ale 66 501(CX4), (5), or (5) wPnkat *A$, Is Were subat;nlally all duos nondeduotlbie by members? ..... .. ..................... ebb b Did the arganiMbon mane only In-house tobbyft expandraures of t12.000 or lasso . • .. ........ • ......... • ................. If "Yes" Was an WWW to slow gft or Wb, do not CWVWW aft ttrough W below unless V* organization received a waiver tar prosy tax owed for the prior year. i tI NA •• 1. o Dues, assessments, and simAar amounts front members ... • .................. . ............. N A d Suction 102(s) lobbying and political S*ondL ras........................................ i>4td fie N A e Aggregate nondeductible amount of section filt)33(exixA) dues notloss........................ • • f Taxable amount of lobbying and politick o pox tires Nne 85d less Me) ....................... I 111of 0 goes the arganintion elect to pay the seclon 8W9) im on the amount In 116f? ................ ....... • ................ as h It section tl033(®)(i)(A) dues notleoae were sent. does the organization agree to add the amount In 85f to its reasonable estrnato ° } of dues alioabis to nondeductible lobbying and polticel o pendltures tar the folowin0 tax Year?..........., ... ..... ..... . ... . r.. N Sol (c)(1) prgr iatione. Entavr: contributions Inoluded on line It ................................... sea N /A '? e Initiation fees and capital sob N A ' b Orm roceipts. included on line 12, for pubic use of club finite ........................... .Y 57 501;cX12) organtsationa. Enter: t7a N A a Gross incornb from members or sharehold S....................................... • ... , 't a Gross Income tom other sources• (Do not net amaxts due or paid to other sourea against amounts s'f6 N/A �k?r; k due or received atom thorn.)......................................................... partnip? ...... .ersh........ see At any time during the year, did the organization own a 90% or greater interest in a taxable owporstan or • .... >d ifYes,• complete Part IX . .... ................. •................................. sea 501(ox3) organizations. Enter; Amount of W Irnpaed an the Organization during the year under: O W section 4g11► 0 :section 4812 ► 0 ; section W5 ► - b 5pt(cx3) and I501(c)(4) organiatiom Did the organiaetlon engage In any section 4958 cam$ be transae;tion during . . ..... ... eel the year? if'Yeei,' attach a stnWWrIt SVWrdRg each t•smaeUon ................. ... X X A A C Enter: Amount of tax Imposed on the orpantzatlon managers or disquatled parsons during the year under , • 0 sections 40 49% 4liEA.... ... ....► 0 1�, and ... ... ... ..• d enter: llMMW of tax In alit, above, reimbursed by the organization ............... .... • ................... • , ...► we List the states with which a oopy of this return Is fled ► None ........... 90b 0 b Number Ot ernpicywe employad In the pay period that lnaludee March 12, 999 (sue+ Instructions.) .... • • • • • o . , . . TNephone no. ► , (9 0 9) 7 8 7 -110 0 fit The books are in acre of ► STEPHEN B I SHOP z1P + 4 ► 9 2 5 0 6 Located at ► 3726 TIBBET'I'8 STE C, RIVERSIDE, CA .....N A � 1 n t charibitble trusts 11 % Form titi0 In Ilea of Farm 1041- Ch hock here ....... ... . es Section 4947(ax) o+�mp .' N A WA S AN ft Mm01xn4 tax-sxe t received ar eoor duct the tar ... ► Fora+ elQ pool .1 0' FWf"y (1"o United Cerebral Falev of ss Erlttr QrON afftou s univa 0tterMAse IndioaNd. ---- - 1,1 Program service rwar X a THRIFT STORE -- - Unrelated buelness Moony lbfdu�ded b Notlon 612 51 air 514 a�) 6001 P Wed or l unotJon lnooffla f177,45 {�) Business oode �) AMWr4 tp E>ooOW cods �) AmOUrt a e f Medkwe/Medloald payntMts ........ , , . , ... . 0 Fees and ocahols from 40varnment apendsa .. . f14 MsmW%* duos and sass an+ertla .... , ...... 06 1 nisrest on Nw vs d. toverary (wall investments its dhrldends and Interest from faCurltlea ......... N/� /�/y�/� Orw� 17 Not Wile! Incofrte M Poss) tons Mal "im a debt-Inanoed property ..................... b not debt-lInanolad property .................. so Net rental Income or (loss) from persona! property !! Other Iff4as nwd irtaorna ................ • • . 100 "m1lou tron+ esin of assets other than Inventory 101 Net Incerme or (loss) torn special events ........ 102 arose or* or (loss) from sales of Inventory ..... to3 Other revenue: s MI SCELLANEOUS IN b 13,044 •�!. r.ity:, ..` �S.K •t•:�+ 4yY V. 'i"~'•�Y>i 'x ��•:v>tti' 41C� q yJN�vlxi•:l•:r': r w•:.•..•�!w.Y�>. ',.��t••L+i'7iflti "4iiln•iF7v�(;W'•.. :wtgl :�•Px•::y:••iA.w:w• }I.,:... 2 - 2 609 c a 104 Subtotal {add (columns (13). jV). and (E))........ log Total (add line 104. edu mns M ), (o), and (E))............................................... f ....... . ► 170,568 Note: (Line 105 plus lime I d, W I, should equal the amount on Eno 12, part 1. LaaaMl^ 1.%aln wwrinna nn nweR V. A Line No. Explain how etch oioNty for which lnoonne is rspa *d In 0olumn (E) of Part.Vll confrlbuted Inwortar►tly 10 the accon+Rllshmenl afthe an"t purposes (other than by provldkV funds for such purposes). o ovinvom% REVENUE GENERATED THROUGH COOPER.A I FFORT WITH CAL )3B THRI T • L03A MISCELLANEOUS INCOME ;p ~ information ReaerdIviv Ta&W SUbeldlsrles and 01s arded EnNes {sees f menimpof Matta of ownw2hip buslnMs astw111ss c lnstr dOn ongoneso TOW (sn4•of-ysr MCOM assets mama, adrYaaa, and am IrMntltgatian a°Ys number of awagratIam or partewsh IP interest NIA x 1i Under penalties of perjuy, I dadare that � this �of IncluditV mg schedules and Wo to the beg of M s6s ts based on s1 isnfarnuNon of hgh prepvsr DeclaratlamIned Cdl1°'r°onr� p�pv'w' (other than ofhcerl` knowWd� end gees(. K ts true. ooRact, complete. Pleaf><e has any knowledge. (Impo(tant: gee General instrudan U. en Pape IA.) Sign ' 00 title, Mere oats Typo or print name 'tfsnawn of 0f1WW ' Oats Cheek If ��wr1 eeN or MIN �t�pr«y employed ►® F 0 018 3 686 David B Marion Wa slf�naiwo . Smith Marion & Co . CPAs !,N ► 142391 Preparerse use only frsna for22365 Barton Rea Ste 108 alt..►f-eoiWsai fsol ZIP+4 ► 92313 andaditOt! t7W-AM TArrana . A _ .....am nni 1 �3 logo Ment 80" Federal Statements Unittd Cerebral Palsy of the INand EM MO Page 1 33-M I SM5 ant 1 Form 9901 Part 1, Line 1d %FUM IMtUoae, use and Graft Direct Contributions: Contributor's Name Not Open To Public inspection Contributor's Address Direct Contributions less than 23 of line ld Total Direct Contributions, Line la Indirect Contributions less than 2% of line id Total Indirect Contributions, Line 1b Government Grants: Contributor's Name Contributor's Address INLAND REGION CENTER Government Grants less than 2% of line id. Total Government Grants, Line lc Total Contributions, Line id Amount of Cont r . $ 144,054 S 144,054 Amount of Contr. $ 1,225 -s- 1-1"22S Amount of Contr. . $ 731,694 $ 7,618 739,3121 884,591 logo Morel $046 Federal Stat8MOntS UnRed Cen&d Pdsy of Ow Inland Empim Page 2 33-0118716 Btfereent 2 Form W, Pert I, Line 8 Net Inoome (Loa) from Spsdal Ewnts Special Events: A) CELEBRITY GOLF TOMMY B) VARIOUS OTHER EVENTS V Other: Special Events A B C Other Total Grose Receipts weer 31,168 0 0 119,295 66,550 Less: Contributions 66,550 0 Gross Revenue 21,577 31,168 0 0 52,745 73,282 Less: Direct Expenses 68,828 41454 Net income (Loss) $ -47, 251 26,714 0 -20, 537 &&=nt 3 Form 690, Part I Line 16 Payments to At&ietes Name and Address Purpose of Payment Amount UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY NATIONAL DUES 6,108 UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY STATE DUES 1,440 Total $ 548 Statement 4 Form 990, Part t Lbw 20 Other Ch&"s* to Net Assets Or Fund 116100" PRIOR YEAR AUDIT ADJUSTMENTS ............................... $ 18,808 UNREALIZED GAIN ON INVESTMENTS 31071 Total $ 23.1879 8tttement 5 Form W Part UI 0'gen;;i6n's Primary Exempt Purpose SERVCE INDIVIDUALS WITH CEREBRAL PALSY logo Federal Statements Unbd Cerebral Pray of Client $046 the Inland Ernplro Page 3 334116715 stebm"te Donn M, Part 11, Line a Stldww t of Program Servlos Aecor*18hMents Description PROGRAM COLLECTS USED ITEMS TO E SOLD IN THRIFT STORE. UCP RECEIVES FEQS FROM THE THRIFT STORE FOR THE PICKUP SERVICE THEY PROVIDE. PROGRAM SENDS TRAINED INDIVIDUALS TO RELIEVE THE MAIN CARE PROVIDER OF A DISABLED PERSON FOR A FEW HOURS PER MONTH. APPROXIMATELY 41550 HOURS OF SERVICES PROVIDED. APPROXIMATELY 135 CLIENTS SBRVED ANNUALLY. CAMP FOR YOUTH AND YOUNG ADULTS OPERATED DURING THE MONTH OF AUGUST. APPROXIMATELY 60 YOUTH AND YOUNG ADULTS ATTEND CAMP. AFTER SCHOOL RECREATIONAL PROGRAMS PROVIDES A EXPERIENCED RECREATIONAL COACH FOR EVERY 3 PARTICIPANTS. ACTIVITIES EMPHASIZE INTERACTION AND SOCIALIZATION WITH AGE APPROPRIATE PEERS WITHOUT DISABILITIES. CHILDREN AGES 8-18 TAKE PART IN PROGRAM. APPROXIMATELY 21 CHILDREN INVOLVED. Statement 7 Form 9N, Pot IV, Line 34 Itwasbn*n% - 9e0UM*8 U.S. Government Obligations Government Bonds Program Grants and Service Allocations Expenses $ 0 147,643 0 4059772 0 2,219 0 139;44159 Valuation Method Amount Total Market Value $ 13,184 $ 13,184 Total --13,184 1999 Federal Statements Page 4 Unbd Cerebra Palsy of Clien16046 the Inland Empire 334116715 Statement d Form Dart IV, Una 67 Land, sRdlnps, and Equipment Asset Furniture and fixtures Improvements awmaM 9 Form �O r As�tlsd IV, Line 68 Oft Accum. Book Bads Deprec. value $ 29,066 22,144 61922 a,000 0 2,000 Total 31, vot-22,,144 6,922 Ending LEASE ]DEPOSITS ....... ...................................... 3 950 Total 8ta went 10 Pam 290, Part IV, Une 65 Other LlsbllMn Ending Rounding ................................................... $ 1 SALARIESPAYABLE ........................................... 24,,5.94. VACATION PAYABLE ........................................... 5,428 t Toal Statement 11 Pam ON, Port V Ust of Ottlars, DlrsCtors, Trustees, and Key Employees Title & avg. Name and Address Hro/wk devoted EDWARD ATWOOD, JR INDIAN WELLS, CA 92210 PAM BOUTON PALM SPRINGS, CA 92260 PREISDENT 4 MEMBER 4 Employee Expense Ben. Pin Account/ Comp. Contrib. Other $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 v 3io 1�99 Pago 5 Federal Statements Unkd ftwbral Paley of Client 504d the Inland Empire 33-0118715 stmement 1 (C�ontlnwd) Uet of�art, Directors, Trustees, and Key Employees Employee Expense Title & avg Ben. Pln Account/ Name and Address Hre/wk devoted Comp. Contrib. Other CLARISE LUBEL SECRETARY 0 0 0 4 PALM S PRINCES , CA 9 2 2 6 3 GARY L AMY MEMBER 0 0 0 4 CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 BECCI IAMELE MEMBER 0 0 0 4 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 ALVIN LA SALLE VICE PRESIDENT 0 0 0 4 CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 JAN WARNER EXEC DIRECTOR 46,000 0 0 40+ CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92264 KEN KARPINCRIK TREASURER 0 0 0 4 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 TOM ADAMO MEMBER 0 0 0 4 CATHERDRAL CITY, CA 92234 PAMELA AMY MEMBER 0 0 0 4 CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 LISA MANNING MEMBER 0 0 0 4 CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 YVONNE ATWOOD MEMBER 0 0 0 4 INDIAN WELLS, CA 92210 999 Federal Statements Page 6 Unbd Cerebral Paley of Client 5046 the Inland Empire 33-01t�7t6 �m Std ment 11 Continued) LrOrn m P84 V Lis! of %awa, Dlnotore, Trustees, and Key lrnployeee Employee Expense Title & avg. Ben. Pln Account/ Name and Address Kra/wk devoted Comp. Contrib. Other BOB BYPIELD MEMBER 0 0 0 4 INDIAN WELLS, CA 92210 BILLY ERI CKSON MEMBER 0 0 0 4 PALM DESERT, CA 92260 MI CKI JAMES MEMBER 0 0 0 4 RANCH 0 MIRAGE, CA 92270 Total 4 1-SWCHEDULE A (Form W) Depar"Writ of the TrWWY lnwm Revenue service looms of the Arm"Intom Organlzeftn Exempt Under Section 501(c)(3) wh1VftixiM47(iK(MM,W. or snow q NWMWW clWo" 7"* Supplonuft" Informd1on - (See separate Instructions.) 10 Must Ims mated-W tft am or§MbWM god afthed to #Wdf ftM M Of "O-IEL to Cerebral Palav of I EW4* OM a Na 1545.0047 1999 the Inland Empire I 33-011V15 r l':400M Cc npensdion of the Five Highest Paid Employees Other Than Officers, DireoWs, and Trustees (Sw oMa I of ft lintuolions. List owh onip, 9 thwe w* nom w-Aw 01400cw) 6) Name and addroeS of each employee PW0MW4 tIM1116110,D00 71fle and averalt tours per week devoted to posillon ColrePeneatiotlempley" (00~11101MI 40 benow plane i Of WTSCI OWWOM1100M to) EXPORIS Account and other Allowl"Coll None 0 Fit 4 TdAI MuMbW of AW OMPICYSeS PAM *VW $W,000 10 compensdion of the Five Highest Paid Independent Contractors for Professional Services Maa nsm I rd the Inatrimmons 1-tat Mk6h 6AA fwhiathw IndIVIdUak Or &MS.) If thWe We ratio, 00W "NOW) Name and ad*sos of each Imeopandent a&Mfuiv paid more than $50,000 (b) Type Of BWVW I" coMonsalion None �;j 8 O: X 0 oTotal nUfttr Of 01210M IMOlving over $30,00f mrMorucinnid RMYI&M. 0 For Pepwwark ROMOV6111 ACt ftftsi ON PGV I Of thib hAk"10" for FWfn M and Form 00(�-EZ- KFA Senews A (Form 9w) IM sah"AAOR&" @NJ 110 United Cerebral Palsy of 3 3 - 0118 715 floe I y $tS amen About Acth►OS Yea No 1 During the year, has the crganlm1w adam*d to Influence nabonal. sta* or local 491slabon, Including any attempt to inftuenoe pt»* Conkn on a I *iovs matter or rel w%Wrn1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ................. . ................ B "Yee,' mien ttta bbi expeneea pall a Ineurred in ownection with the lobbying activities. ► 1N/A Organisations that made an election under eeodon 301(h) by fang Form 5768 must complete Part M -A. Clow orpanlzations ohKWIV "yes," must complete Part vt-8 AND afteh a statement plVinp a dstailad description of the lobbying actlVitive. f with any Of it: t�iteea, 2 During the year. has ttw organizado , either dhaaly or Indirectly engaged in any a the buowing acts directors, odes:, creators, key amployses, or nwmbera or their fam3im, a with any tLuble orgar+tzalon with whloh any such person is affiliated as an oifiar, direda, tustee, majority own6r, Or prfnclpal benefbiary, 1 X ` a� >x . �Y` '�"`��{ "` ``�•: ;,M..,«.:1:�.�.»aH.�..�,.• r'r:»1 •�., wJ w vex• aSale, whan9e,or11MInq of prop"?........................................................................ z+a X bLancing of m r*y es ether extension Of aredt? .................. 1 . 1 , , . 1 1 ....................... 1 1 ........ , ..... . Zb X t furnlshing of goods. .....................,..,...., ............ ........................ services, or halAties? . • 20 d Paymer4of eompanrweon (a• payment or relmbLmmenf of expenses if more than it,om ?See . Harm. 9 9.0,,.. RaXt -'/. 2d X e Transfer of any part of Its income or assdst.................................................................... if the &newer to any question is'yw,,, sitsaoh a detailed stgWrnant explaining the lfanaaClona. za X a Does the organization make grants for scholatsh",11otlowehips, student loans, etc.? ................... 1 1 ............... = X i 44 Do you have a section 40%b) annuity plan for your employees? .................................................... t4la c •`• �� b Aftach a attbmant to explain how the argan Don de�rmines that Individuals or orpaNsatiors receiving Craft a fans tram It in furtherance of It Charitable eNtiffis &USINY to reoalw PaymarAL See Instructions on pne 2. RDOW for NoMPrIVift FOundWOM SttlINIS (See pagers 2 through 4 of the lnstruotions.) The organittatbn Is not a pViwte bundation because It Is: (Piass check only 0111E apploable box). 5 ❑ A Church, convention Of churches, or aasoclation of churches, 9scction t70(bX1XAXi). 6 ❑ A school. &wkn 170)(1 XAxil). (Ako comptet l Part V, Pape A.) 7 ❑ A hospNst or a Cooper&" hoepftl stela organization. Section 170(bx1MX4 a ❑ A Federal, *110, or Iooal Qovernrnant or governmental unit. Section 170(b)(1)(AXv), e ❑ A medical research ongen Uation operated In conjunction with a hapital. SeCtlon I70(bX1 XAXIII). Enter the hoepttal's name, city, and $tate No io ❑ An organization operated for the benetlt of a college or uniwrslty owned or operated by a governmental unit: Season 170(b)(1)(AXN), (Also complete the Support Scheftk In Part IV -A.) 1� • ®An orpantaatlon stet( normally reoetws a aubatanttal part of ib support from a goVernmental unn or from the general public. Section 170(bXtXAXvl). (Also oompia4 "Support Schedule In Pai IV -A.) 11 b ❑ A community Lust. Section I70(bX1 XA)(vl). (Also ConV16% the Support Schedule in Part IV -AI) 12 ❑ An organisation I* normally reoelvM: (1) mare Ihan des 1i' % of its support kom =*butlons, membership fees, and orosi receipts from acivitiee related to It: chwUlbis, at., funclione- oubject to CWtaln exaptlons, and M no more than ties 1N6A of its support from Bras Investment Income and unrelaiad business tiolable Income (less seoion 511 tax) tram bushes age acquired by the organisation after June 30,197;S. See section SWaX2). "o oompft the Support Schhedule In Part IV -A.) 13 ❑ An argarization that in mat controlled by any disqualified parsons (other than foundation managers) and evpportz organlzatw % desoribed In: (1) Ilnee 5 through 12 above: or (2) section 501(c)(4), (5), or (5), If they meet the test of section 509(ap. (See asetion 5*aX8).1 provide the folomng Information about the eupportod organlzstiors. (See pipe 4 of the Instructions.) (b) Line number 00 Name(s) of ewported organb ation(s) from above 14 ❑ An organization nlaed and OIW&tA to teat far public sa . Section SMaXO. gee 0120 4 of the i LctOm> SChedlJte A (Form 11100)1 14 ".` ft+ $dullAOwm@so) teas United Cerebral Palsy of 33 - 0118715 *sae % BYppod SOh*dUIE (Complebs only if you cheoked a bolt on line 10, 11, or 11.) UM cash method of secounti% 1►1M., YOU M VW workMW In the Instructions for Convertutg rem trio accrualw and teen rrtanev v1 aws:vWrrQ.� . cal"ON f►aar W tb) 1W (0) flint (d) im (e) 7011W (or good rant bNOM111110 In).. . . 15 Glues. graft, and caft bufons (ateiwd. (Do MO iMAG animal ant& as iris M.)............ 553,696 294,994 386,906 324,626 11560,222 1s Membership him reooi w ....... 17 Ores e rNe+pta frM ashilows, inareflaadele told ar urVIN! pufermed, dr twnishind er IwwlNd loanyaatwNy � to Ilia ores nWum's 7 221,927 19 2 9 9 4 Z Z, 999 charnablousineas ow,d 0ae .. 181 e 7 3 ii wcow Inoonn frees Merest, dividends, amunlereeelvad1AWpayMa IS an seelrmas oesetron at fox rents. reyaitles, end unrelated VARM696 taxable rotor Teas seet►en 811 taw") from bulifle"61 aoquked"the art hastion altsr 4YM m,1 red , .. , ....... . 11 Net income from unrelated business activilles sat ineuded In we 16 ... 30 Tax revenues Ivied for the organiatlari% bend t and elthOr d to it or nded on Ito behalf 21 The value of mvidas or faallkies furnished to the orol ftlian by a sevarnn�ental unit wltheuI er►aras. Doot ►nua>. ih« "0 rp wNh1w1110 shod s 1 dik . 22 Outer Income. Attach a $oh. 00 not Include gain or Jim) Mont sale of Iislaseels $tm..12, 3,643 1, d32 i �. 147 32 844 39, 266 .5eC. 0 Tow of lines 15Wo 99 ...... 739 112 518,553 ; 407, 352 357,470 2,022,487 24 sine23minucline t7 557,339 296f6261IOST 357,470 11 599 488 26 Enter 1% Of tine 23 . 7, 3 9 l 5, 18 6 4,C74. .31 `o 9 9 0 its Owisations dear bed on Ines 10 or 11: a Enter 2% of amount In column (a). rind 24 ......................► zee b Attach a lift (which is not open t0 pubic inspection) showing the name of and amount contributed by each person 'ra: i,l . *-Irz;� ;.:i �t, ....; r•; unit a s Mod gifts for 1995 through i 998 esoeadsd (other them a pownrrrnt pubut:fY DPP crgeNiatian) whose to1i11 the amount shown in ins M. Enter the sum of all these astom amounts .... . ............................ ...► 2db e Total support for eectton SM&X1) best: Enter fine 24. column (a) ....... . .... . .. . ..... . . . . . . , . , ..... , .. , . , ....► zee 1 5 9 9,488 d Add: Amount from odun+n (e) for lutes: 1b 1! zed• .:..�::,�::...::,.:•as,<::.:,�•:>::: 39 266 sz 39,266 '1b ...............► flea 11560,222 a Pubic support pine 26c minis tine 26d tots!) ..... .......................................................► 9 7 5 5% .n-- .&— i,........e.,.% at..tA.a hv tlng flan fdanornlnatlorSl . .....► set r 27 OrvwO wh ate Iona deeoftbed on Ible 2 ' a p For amounts InCluded in lines 15,113, erld 17 that were reCeW tom a wasquallfied person' attach a list to show the name of, and total amounts reoolvad in woh year from, sash Nbquallfied pww.w Enter the sum of such amounts for "elm you: N/A OW) Ow0 M) (1995) b For any amount included In tine i7 that was recehfed tom a nondisquanod person, attach a list to show the name of, and amount reoehrsd for "Ch yw, that was MOM than the harper of (1) the amount on one 23 for the year or R)118,000. (Include In the list organinsans described In lines 6 through 11, as well as IndVIdAIL) After oompulnq the diffarence between the amount received and the lamer amount dasalbed in (1) or (2), enter the an of elf these dide aim (the mcMe amounts) for each year: OM I (IBM (1996) (I=) 0 add: Amounts thorn column (a) for tines: 16 is 10 270 i STd d Add: Line 27a Iloilo! .. and line M tow ......... ......... , a Public support (One 270 11011111 minus line 27d total) .............................. , . ... .................► S f :..° " ::"•a;:3 ":y ;�;.:;;•.»w 2 best Enter amount on line 23, column (0) ........ ! Total support ttr esotlon 30si(ex) � � q Pubitc aupporl parvsnieoe tip aft u+u>�dw') dtvtdad by Una rR (denominairorn ............ . . . .... . . . ' 11111110 h inveabnen! Intone sine 1a, eeluntn (a) (reuniter dlvlded b41 NM 271 derlornMtoc ).. , . , ....► =?11 Ze uausvat *rants For an organ4liltion described in line 10, 11, or 12 that roe~ any unusual grants during IM through t99e, attach it Hof (which Ise Pat open to public Inspeoson) for each year showing the name of the contributor, the doe and amount of the grant, and a brief *wlplfon of the raturs of the nit. IDa no irtoure those warb In line If. page 4 of the lnstruotiorte• "au is A Farm e90) I lee y aahsdui.4Pwm1sot,eseUnited Cerebral Pal®Y of 33-0118'715 pap 4, ,.in Privab BChOOt tiufilititlOM AIm (Bee pace 4 d the Instructions.) IMMIM e be wm~ MY by >Ktleota that ehedoad the bon an Rine d In Part M N/A Yea tro ZI Dos the organizaton have a raoWy nondisorlmlrtatory policy toward sts,ldwft by statement In Na ottartsr, bylaws, other governing instrument, or In a resolution of fb governing body9........... ............................................. 30 Does the �::,.:�.:.:.::..:............. CrgalftllOn latitude a statement of its raoWly nondiscriminatory policy toward students in all its brochures. CaGlocues, and Other written oommunioations with the public dealing with studert admissions, programs, and scholarships? ................ ao 31 Has the organfpltlon pubAdsed its radaliy nondlsoriminatory policy through newspaper or broadcast media during the period of adicitation for students, or during the recisiradon icy perl0d If N has no soAclWlan program, In a way that makes the pot known to all parts of the general OOMM W Ry N serves4.................................................................... 31 It "Yes; please describe. M *Pk." phase explela. of you need ore space. attar separate > m h a grata statement. 32 Does the organistion maintain tte following: a Records Indicating the resold compaeison of the student body, faculty, and adminlaratlw staff? ............................... b Mtaeads doOUam t rig that scholarships and other financial assistance are awarded on a racially nondscriminatory basis? .......... c Copies of all catalogues, brochwes, announcements, and other written communicatlons to the pubic dealing wttn student admissions, programs, and a 0h01ars11ipey.......................................... ....................... . d Copies of all material used by the organization or on ifs b ohan to josh cont1butions4...................................... if you answered "Now to any of the above, pkHM exp1114l. (if You need more space, attach a separate statement.) 33 Does the organzaton disc riminatQ by race In any way with respect to aSWde tt' rlghta or pftleges?............................................................ , ........ , ........... . bAdrdsslons policies? .................................... ............................... I..................... t Employrnent of faculty or administrative staff?..................................................................... . dScholarships or other AnancW assWAnW....................................................................... . eEduutianat pdicwm?................. .............................. ...,.,,........ 0.......................... fUse of WNW ........................................................................................... 9 Athletic programs?.......................................................................................... hother cularacdivitias4....................................................... ........................ If you answered'YW to any of the above, ploaso explain. (if you need more space, attach a 6QWate statement.) 34A Does the organftoon receive any financial aid or assistance from a governmental agency? .. .............................. . b H#A the w9anisation's right to such aid tear been revoked or suspended? ............................................. . If you anawend "Yes" to either 3" Or b, please explain using an attached statement. u Does the organization certify that it has compiled with the applicable requirements Of WtIOns 4.01 through 4.03 Of Rev. Prot. 73-50, .I 36L %76-g 0.13. 587realest randiswiminalen? If "Noy attach art (ant M .. ... ..... j ichedvie A (109 M) 1991 a no dult A Olwm sea) i ato Ltnited Cerebral Palsy of 33-011671.5 %go 6 Lobbying Evendftum by Ehidng Putillo Charitiall (so page 6 of the Instructions.) NTA- (To be completed ONLY by an dalbis orpritmoon that ftW Form VW) Check hare 11io a [I N the oVeNzition belongs to an aftlad group. Cheek hens ► b 0 if wou ohm*od V above and 111mbd contra' crovislons awls. Urnite on Lobbying Ekpandt"is Affillatid group To be oompleled (TM term Rempandillurer Mans arnounts paid or Incurred.) for ALL fttng etbnli 36 Talh lobbft w pandturee to IrMusnet pLbk opinion (orawcalle lobbying) .................... 36 37 37 Total lobbying GXWd1tWn to Influence a laglislaivs body (dkW lobbying) ..................... 31 38 Totm lobbying eVendUft (add Jim 35 and 37) ......................................... 39 0 Other Mmot pwom expenditures ................................................... 40 40 TetL wompt purpose eowwfihm (acid JIM 38 and 39) ................................... . vzf i W 41 Lobbying nontaxable amount. Ender tile arnwd from the following table - N the onwint, on Inc 40 to - The lobbying rmvtaabk amount Is - Not over MW,0W ...................... V% of the amount on line 40 ................. Over 1116Mown.00D but not w$1,000,000 ...... 1111100AM plus 15% of the 11com ow 0=9000 41 Over $1 =000 but W am $1,600j= 111176.000 plus 10% of the VMM ow 61,000,0=W Over $I MOM but not ow $17,000,000 ... $225,000 plus 5% Of the NOM MW 111,600= - - 0M $I 720,0M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :36! 7 A . . . . . . . . . . 4111 &aW*ob nontsjubis amount (enter 26% of Ina 41) ...................................... 42 43 43 Subtract lime 42 from Am 36. Enter -0- if Erw 42 Is more than One 35 .......................... 44 44 Subtract line 41 from Jim 38. Enter -0- If fine 41 Is more than Me 36 .......................... Caution: If there Is on arnowit on altvar line 42 or line 44 yoU must Ale Form 4M. q �R, N 4-Year Averaging Period Under SeWon 601(h) (Some orgwizallom that made a section 801 (h) 9WHon do not hrAm to cowlele all of the Rvm columns below• &w ft fttuedonz tw lira AS 1youah 510 an page 7 of the Instructions.) I Lobbying "ndW*l pAng 4-Yew Averaging Period C&Wldw "W (d) 19) (or flaciol year beginning In) 10- 1989 199D 1987 l99a Total 46 Lobbying nontaxieble ornQunt. 46 Lobbying coiling amount u. INN A S A! 0 50% of line As)) ........... I 47 Total labg *xPqMditUM ...... 44 &&wools nontaxable amount 40 Grassroots ceiling amount Pig, (150% of line 90)) ......... -XI 4 14: ao &uwoft laboying 0"riditures, -I LzbWng AoWlty by NoneltatIng Public CharlWs (Far reporting only by organizatons that did not coff"ato Pan VI -A) (S" P&QG a of the imstructlons.) During the year, did this arganization attempt to Influence nadonal, state or 1Qwl legislation, InClUdIM9 any OftmPt to influertoe public opinion on a WOWAVY6 m&tW or referendum. through the as of: 2 VOILMsers .......................................................... ........................... D Paid staff or management (Include compensation In expenses reported an lines e through h.). I , , • .. ............. . 0 M841s, ~somorft ............................................................................. d mailings to membets, Wolelators, or the public... ............................... , . ................... . e Publications, or publisted or broadcast $kWMfb ....................................................... f Orants to other organkadons fa 160ft PUfPCM ...................................................... 9 oirect conjad with legislators, their staffs, Qov4MnWnt OHIO", or a ft"We body ......... L I ................... jh ftlWS, dqMojj$V&bGnS. 99minars, conventions, speeches, Jectm, or any other MMM .......................... % TcAaj ftbyWV *x1penditures, (add lines c through h) ...................................................... AMOUnt If -Ya5* to any of ft above, abio attach a statement giving a detailed dosoription of the lobbying 4&4*6- --dmwwmw� fthaMs A (Form 990) 11111111 kh.au*A(FWMDODl,8ss United Cerebral Palmy of 33-0118715 ftoo 6 information Reeding Trensfiro To and Trwn*WUOM& and RolsOonshlps With Noncharl#able 4amat CrnaMlons (on paoe a of to instructims.) 61 Did fttr reporting orgartlaatlon dledY or Indirectly enPP in eny of the followlltg wkh tiny Other or90nlz IOA dow bod in wt7or 501(c) of ate Code (ether fhan seoW SM(ox3) organizations) or to seclon Sr, staling to poRWW organizations? a Trarst rs from to fogwIng organisstian to a nonahwilable exempt orgenlzatbn of: Yes Ito a) Cash............................................................................................... 61a1 X (1) Ciharaeeese...... ....................... ,...,..,.................................................... X b Other fnneullom., 0) 3des or s changes of asks with a noncharitolo exempt organisation ........................................... b X (1) Purchases of as" from a noncharlbble exampt orgartzatior................................................... D t X (111) Rental of botl'ilisa, or other amb......................................................................... bell) X (W) ftrnbursementOyangerr+ants.............. .1.1..,....................................................... KV x (Y) Leans or loan guarantNs.................................................................. ,............ X (1M) Perfor r%noe of servbes or membership or fundralsing solicitations ............................................... b(vi) X e Sharing d far lliks. equipment, malling iisb► aver assets, or paid employeas.......................................... c X d it the answer to any of the above is "Yes"Complete fhe fdlowfng schedule. Column (b) should always show the fair marfcet value of fits goods. eb+er me%, or servbes given by the reporting organisation. It the crgarifttlon received less than fair market value in any ran"don a sharino arrangfinent► show In column (d) the value of the gooft other assets, or services received- ;Zs is the organization directly or Indirectly afMisted with, or related to, one Of Mora tax-Wrnpt organtzarons aeconovo in svcuum w'lut M Yea ®Na of the Code (cther then section 501(ax3)) or in section 527? , .. , , ,............................................... . M I -A— W.� t..11w.uiww rwkaAaLL& _ Name of organisation (b) 'type of organi2aticn ` Dowiptien of rslatlonship N/A ue r0'A1fi1i0j148O 1999 01ent 8046 Federal Statements Un[Wd Careft Paby of the Irtiand Empko Pay® i 334118716 Stitlh' nt 12 Otlw �� "Part IV-Jly Ltry � Description MISCELLANEOUS (a) 1998 (b) 1997 (c) 1996 (d) 1995 (a) Total 3,643 11632 1,147 32,844 39 266 1,147 32,844 39,266 ATTACHMENT 4 P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLS TAMPICO (760) 7 7 7 - 7 0 0 0 LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 FAX (760) 777-7101 COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT GUIDELINES The City of La Quinta offers the Community Services Grant program to recognized nonprofit organizations that benefit the residents of La Quinta. Priority for funding is granted to organizations that directly benefit La Quinta residents, second consideration is given to organizations that indirectly affect the quality of life for the residents of La Quinta. Individuals are not eligible for funding through the Community Services Grant program. Organizations that receive Community Development Block Grants from the City of La Quinta during the same fiscal year are not eligible for funding through the Community Services Grant program. Completed grant applications will be considered by the La Quinta City Council at the first Council meetings of August, November, February and May of each fiscal year. Applications are due three weeks before the scheduled City Council meeting. Once the application is placed on the agenda for City Council consideration, the organization will be notified of the date of the meeting for consideration. Applications must be typed. Incomplete applications will be returned to the applicant. Organizations requesting "seed" money are required to obtain matching funds from other sources in the same fiscal year before Community Services Grant funds will be released. Organizations requesting more than $2,499 are required to obtain matching funds from other sources in the same fiscal year. The City Council may authorize the release of up to $2,499 while matching funds are being secured by the organization. For more information on the Community Services Grant program, please contact the Community Services Department at 760-777-7032. (5A, CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT FISCAL YEAR 01-02 Name of Organization: C . A. R. E Program . Amount Requested: $ 6 0 0 0 . Contact Person: Margo Hamilton Mailing Address: 82-675 Hwy. 111 Ste. 3140 City: Indio State: CA. Zip Code: 92201 Phone No.: 760-863-7661 501(c)3 Taxpayer I.D. Number: #80095953 Date Submitted: 1 / 21 / 0 2 Applications will receive consideration without discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin or disability. C q � �J COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT APPLICATION (Must be typed) 1. What is the overall purpose or goal of your organization? • To raise the consciousness of the public about elder abuse • To train those who come in daily contact with seniors (i.e. bankers, plumbers, volunteers, law enforcement, medical staff, caregivers) to recognize and report elder abuse. • To provide advocacy to those who become victims of consumer fraud. • To coordinate and train the C..A.R.E. Elder Abuse Team to share resources, determine successful care and/or protection plans for victimized seniors, and train law enforcement and D.A.'s to successfully investigate cases toward prosecution. 2. How long has your organization been in existence? 4 Years 3. Describe in general the activities or services of your organization: The CARE Program helps elder and dependant adults who are victims of consumer fraud recover their losses. CARE gives presentations to organizations and to the public who come in contact with seniors to help educate them in recognizing and preventing elder abuse of all types. CARE coordinates monthly meetings of the CARE Team, which is made up of over 50 representatives from public safety and social service agencies to resolve elder abuse cases, protect the victims, and prosecute the perpetrators. 4. How many people does your organization currently serve? No. of Youth 0 No. of Adult 0 No. of Seniors Ap rop x 50 per month 5. How many people do you intend to serve during this Fiscal Year? No. of Youth 0 No. of Adult 0 No. of Seniors 600 County -wide 6. How many people served this Fiscal Year will be La Quinta residents? No. of Youth 0 No. of Adults 0 No. of Seniors 15_ 7. How many paid employees/volunteers does your organization employ? Full time employees 12 Part time employees 0 Volunteers 0 8. Describe how your organization is managed and governed. The C.A.R.E. Program is staffed by one Coordinator and one Community Service Assistant in each Supervisorial District. The Coordinators report to a County Regional Manager who reports up the chain of command to the County Director of the Department of Public Social Services. vs� 4 ,.. 9. Please provide information on your Executive Board members or contact person: Name Title Home Address Phone Margo Hamilton Regional Manager 43950 E. Acacia, Hemet 92544 (909) 791-3447 10. What is your annual schedule of events, and during what months does your organization operate? The organization operates year round within the county of Riverside. The C.A.R.E. Program participates in most community events such as Senior Center events, information fairs, T.V. & radio talk shows and cultural events, by providing information about the C.A.R.E. Program. The C.A.R.E. Program also conducts two Gatekeeper trainings per month in the Coachella Valley and four large fraud prevention seminars per year. Trainings are also provided to community service agencies, banks, law enforcement briefings, hospitals, and churches. The C.A.R.E. Program, in conjunction with Adult Protective Services and the District Attorney's office, organizes an Elder Abuse Seminar for Law Enforcement and Senior Service providers in the Spring of each year, training between 175-200 people, about half of whom serve the Eastern Region of the County. 11. Do you charge admission, membership fee, dues, etc.? X Yes No If yes, please describer The C.A.R.E. Program will charge $175.00 for the 2 Day Elder Abuse Seminar. The fee is to cover the price of the food. Community grants and donations cover the remaining costs of the training. All other services are provided free of charge. Some of the community education events and materials are underwritten by grants. 12. What are your other sources of revenue for this funding year? Source A= Conference registration fee ($175 x 175) $30,625 Total Needed $50,000.00 Total Received $ .00 Balance $19,3 75.00 �6b 13. Amount of money requested from the City of La Quinta? $63000.00 14. Has your organization been funded by the City of La Quinta previously? X Yes No If yes, when Fiscal year 99-00 Amount received $1, 000.00 00-01 $2,000.00 15. Please provide the name and address of the bank in which the organization's funds are kept: Bank of America 81-800 Hwy 111 Indio, CA 92201 16. Please provide the name and title of those individuals authorized to sign on the organization's account ( must provide at least two individuals): Name: Title: Judy Campbell Program Supervisor District AttorneyNictim Witness Margo Hamilton Regional Manager, C.A.R.E. Program Michele Haddock Supervisor Adult Protective Services 17. Please provide, as an attachment, copies of the last three months bank statements as well as the last year's December bank statement of the organization's checking and savings account. This account was opened 12/15/00 by The District AttorneyNictim Witness program and has an approximate balance of $610.00 18. Need Statement. Clearly and plainly state the specific, detailed reason or need for the requested funds and how these funds will be used, if awarded. Law Enforcement officers receive very little training on how to identify and investigate elder abuse, as well as how to prepare cases for prosecution. The seminar will train law enforcement officers, deputy district attorney's, adult protective service workers, and senior service providers on best practices. This intense training will prepare investigators and D.A.'s for successful investigations of complicated financial abuse cases involving undue influence and competency issues of the victim. It will include proper techniques for warrants, profiling, interviewing, understanding financial instruments and court orders, probate process, overcoming criminal defense strategies, charging and sentencing, working with dependent adults, effective victim advocacy, and protection issues. The training will also provide information on the medical aspects of physical abuse and neglect, and how to recognize undetected homicides of the elderly. The funds will be used to pay for training materials an panting costs. 19. Goal Statement. Indicate who will benefit from the use of these funds, and how they will benefit. The seminar will benefit law enforcement officers, D.A.'s and senior service providers by providing them with the necessary tools to recognize, investigate and prosecute elder abuse cases in a multi -disciplinary setting. Removing the perpetrators of these types of abuse will result in the prevention of future victimization of East County residents. 20. Attach a copy of your Program Operating Budget for the current year. Not applicable as the CA.R.E. Program budget is not separated from the overall budget of the Department of Public Social Services. 21. Non-profit organizations must attach a copy of the organization's current IRS Form 990. 15�' —wnkof America P.O. Box 3530 Rancho Cordova, CA 95741.,,= INDIO V/W EMERGENCY FUND ELDER ABUSE CONFERENCE 2001 82675 HWY 111 4TH FL INDIO CA 92201 Your Bank of America Business Checking — 0916 Statement _ E 1-2 Statement Period: September 29 through October 31, 2001 Account Number: 09160-03560 At Your Service Call: 760-3404867, 24 hours, 7 days a week Written Inquiries Bank of America Indio Main Office PO Box 37176 San Francisco, CA 94137-0001 ❑ Summary of Your Business Checking Account Beginning Balance on 09/29/01 $6,338.34 Total Deposits and Other Credits + 427.04 Total Checks, Withdrawals, Transfers, Account Fees - 5,000. Service Charge - 10.00 Ending Balance $1,755.38 9 Customer since 1994 Bank of America appreciates your business and we enjoy serving you. Number of checks paid 1 Number of 24 Hour Customer Service Calls Self -Service 0 Assisted 0 ❑ Important Information About Your Account A monthly service charge was applied to your account because your balance was below the minimum balance of $4,000 and the average balance of $8,000. You can avoid this charge by linking other Bank of America savings plans and meeting the $7,500 minimum combined balance or $15,000 average combined balance requirements. ❑ Bank of America News In the wake of the tragic events of September 11, we extend our deepest sympathy and support to all affected by the devastation. Together we grieve, and together we are proving that America's spirit cannot be defeated. As we move forward, Bank of America remains focused on our professional responsibilities to help you manage your financial future. ❑ Deposits Number Date Posted Amount Continued on next page 0020287.001.123 10/ 19 $427.04 California L of 2 V � V Recycled Paper -- ap, of America o;i�j INO V/W EMERGENCY FUND Statement Period: September 29 through October 31, 2001 S)ER ABUSE CONFERENCE 2001 Account Number: 09160-03560 p Checks Paid Date Paid Number Amount 10/31 1013 $5,000.0 ❑ Account Activity Date ►osted Description Reference Number Amount Service Charge 10/31 Monthly Service Charge $ 10.00 ❑ Daily Balance Date Amount Date Amount Date Amount 10/19 $ 6,765.38 1 10/31 1,755.38 ❑ Bank of America: In Balance To assist you in reconciling your account, we have provided the following summary information. A reconciliation worksheet is printed on the reverse of this page. e Your ending balance from this statement..............................................................................................................................$11755.38 e Subtract the monthly service charge from your checkbook register....................................................................................... 10.00 ❑ FACTS - FDIC Insured Account Disclosure Information Bank of America offers nearly 13,000 ATMs where you may access your cash without an ATM fee - more than any other bank. You may be charged a fee by Bank of America when using ATMs that do not prominently display the Bank of America name and logo. The owner of these ATMs, which may be an affiliate of Bank of America, may assess an additional fee. 0020287.002.123 California j 6o P,99 2 of 2 aRecycled Paper Ban k of America �%j Your Bank of America P.O. Box 3530 Business Checking Rancho Cordova, CA 95741.3530 Statement 0916 _ E 1-2 Statement Period: November 1 through November 30, 2001 Account Number: 09160-03560 INDIO V/W EMERGENCY FUND At Your Service ELDER ABUSE CONFERENCE 2001 Call: 760-340-1867, 24 hours, 82675 HWY 111 7 days a week 4TH FL INDIO CA 92201 Written inquiries Bank of America Indio Main Office PO Box 37176 San Francisco, CA 94137-0001 Customer since 1994 Bank of America appreciates your business and we enjoy serving you. ❑ Summary of Your Business Checking Account Beginning Balance on 11/01/01 $1,755.38 Number of checks paid 1 Total Checks, Withdrawals, Number of 24 Hour Customer Service Calls Transfers, Account Fees - 500.00 Self -Service 0 Assisted 0 Service Charge - 10.00 Ending Balance $1,245.38 ❑ Important Information About Your Account A monthly service charge was applied to your account because your balance was below the minimum balance of $4,000 and the average balance of $8,000. You can avoid this charge by linking other Bank of America savings plans and meeting the $7,500 minimum combined balance or $15,000 average combined balance requirements. Bank of America is no longer participating in the STAR ATM network. Your ATM/Check Card will continue to be accepted at all PLUS ATMs. Most ATMs accept PLUS. ❑ Checks Paid Date Paid Number Amount 11128 1014 $500.00 ❑ Account Activity Date Posted Description Reference Number Amount Service Charge 11/30 Monthly Service Charge 1/ $10.00 Continued on next page 0020622.001.123 California I.Rage 1 of 2 aRecycled Paper Bankof America 4% a INDIO V/W EMERGENCY FUND Statement Period: November 1 through November 30, 2001 ELDER ABUSE CONFERENCE 2001 Account Number: 09160-03560 ❑ Daily Balance Date Amount Date Amount Date Amount 11 /28 $ 1, 255. 38 11 /30 1,245.38 ❑ Bank of America: In Balance To assist you in reconciling your account, we have provided the following summary information. A reconciliation worksheet is printed on the reverse of this page. • Your ending balance from this statement..............................................................................................................................$1,245.38 • Subtract the monthly service charge from your checkbook register....................................................................................... 10.00 0020622.002.123 California Page 2 of 2 aRecycled Paper Bank of America �%� P.O. Box 3530 Rancho Cordova, CA 95741-3530 INDIO V/W EMERGENCY FUND ELDER ABUSE CONFERENCE 2001 82675 HWY 111 4TH FL INDIO CA 92201 Your Bank of America Business Checking _ 0916 Statement E 1-2 Statement Period: December 1 through December 31, 2001 _. Account Number: 09160-03560 At Your Service Call: 760-340-1867, 24 hours, 7 days a week Written Inquiries Bank of America Indio Main Office PO Box 37176 San Francisco, CA 94137-0001 ❑ Summary of Your Business Checking Account Beginning Balance on 12/01/01 $1,245.38 Total Checks, Withdrawals, Transfers, Account Fees - 625.00 Service Charge - 10.00 Ending Balance $610.38 ❑ Important Information About Your Account Customer since 1994 Bank of America appreciates your business and we enjoy serving you. Number of checks paid 1 Number of 24 Hour Customer Service Calls Self -Service 0 Assisted 0 A monthly service charge was applied to your account because your balance was below the minimum balance of $4,000 and the average balance of $8,000. You can avoid this charge by linking other Bank of America savings plans and meeting the $7,500 minimum combined balance or $15,000 average combined balance requirements. Faster than writing a check —you can sign and go with the Business Check Card. Visit your local banking center for more information. Member FDIC. ❑ Checks Paid Date Paid Number Amount 12/05 1015 $625.00 ❑ Account Activity Date Posted Description Reference Number Amount Service Charge 12/31 Monthly Service Charge $10.00 Continued on next page 0020471.001.123 California lb Page 1 of 2 0 Recycled Pape, Bankof America �%j INDIO VNV EMERGENCY FUND Statement Period: December 1 through December 31, 2001 ELDER ABUSE CONFERENCE 2001 Account Number 09160-03560 o Daily Balance Date Amount Date Amount Date Amount 12/05 $ 620.38 12/31 610.38 C3 Bank of America: In Balance To assist you in reconciling your account, we have provided the following summary information. A reconciliation worksheet is printed on the reverse of this page. • Your ending balance from this statement.................................................................................................................................$610.38 • Subtract the monthly service charge from your checkbook register....................................................................................... 10.00 6 ;1 0020471.002.1M California 5 .1 Page 2 of 2 QRecycled Pape ATTACHMENT 5 P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLS TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 (760) 7 7 7 - 7 000 FAX (760) 777-7101 COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT GUIDELINES The City of La Quinta offers the Community Services Grant program to recognized nonprofit organizations that benefit the residents of La Quinta. Priority for funding is granted to organizations that directly benefit La Quinta residents, second consideration is given to organizations that indirectly affect the quality of life for the residents of La Quinta. Individuals are not eligible for funding through the Community Services Grant program. Organizations that receive Community Development Block Grants from the City of La Quinta during the same fiscal year are not eligible for funding through the Community Services Grant program. Completed grant applications will be considered b) - he La Quinta City Council at the first Council meetings of August, November, February and May ()f each ;�iscal year. Applications are due three weeks before the schedul ,d City Council meeting. Once the application is placed on the agenda for City Council consideration. the organization will be notified of the date of the meeting for consideration. Applications must be typed. Incomplete applications will be returned to the applicant. Organizations requesting "seed" money are required to obtain matching funds from other sources in the same fiscal year before Community Services Grant funds will be released. Organizations requesting more than $2,499 are required to obtain matching funds from other sources in the same fiscal year. The City Council may authorize the release of up to $2.499 while matching funds are being secured by the organization. For more information on the Community Services Grant program. please contact the Community Services Department at 760-777-7032. l�v ..a� 0 0 V =z JNCOR1 O TM OF CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT FISCAL YEAR 01-02 Name of Organization: - Amount Requested. Contact Person: 1 Mailing Address: City: T Qunta State: CA Zip Code: °2253 Phone No.: 501(c)3 Taxpayer I.D. Number: 3370636136 Date Submitted: 1-22-02 Applications will receive consideration without discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin or disability. ...1 COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT APPLICATION (Must be typed) 1. What is the overall purpose or goal of your organization? Our goals are to promote and support the interests and activites T ing Band, Concert Band, Percussion Ensemble, Jazz Band, Colorguardaadd Winterdrumline. 2. How long has your organization been in existence? 8 Years Months 3. Describe in general the activities or services of your organization: nrgani�ina tha Parents pf sf.Ur1en+-s in the Priande t-n p-r Lyirle financial and physical support to all the differant programs that invole the Brigade. 4. How many people does your organization currently serve? No. of Youth 110 No. of Adults No. of Seniors 5. How many people do you intend to serve during this Fiscal Year? No. of Youth 11 0 No. of Adults No. of Seniors 6. How many people served this Fiscal Year will be La Quinta residents? No. of Youth 110 No. of Adults No. of Seniors 7. How many paid employees/volunteers does your organization employ? Full time employees Part time employees Volunteers 50 to 100 all are volunteers 8. Describe how your organization is managed and governed. We are governed by an FxPr,.utJv Rnarci and Rnarcj of Pi rertnr .hat are elected by the General Membership consisting of pr6sent and padt parents of students in tr Blackhawk Brigade. Open board meetings are held bi- monthly where all mem- bers are invited to attende Dicision are made by a majority vote o a I_, Lb + 9. Please provide information on your Executive Board members or contact person: Name Title Home Address Phone Pete Latham President 38-440 Rancho Los Coyotes B.D. 3455883 Bettyann Sherrel v. President 80-337 Crte Eldorado Indio-75-6985 Ruben Contreras Tresurer 45-720 Coldbrook Ln L.Q. 360-2764 Debbi Contreras Secutary 45- 720 Coldbrook Ln. L.Q. 360-2764 10. What is your annual schedule of events, and during what months does your organization operate? July- Dec. Marching Band Dec.- June Winter Sping Programs The Boosters operate year round. The summer months are spent preparing for the marching season including field shows for the football schedule and fiR-1-4- 616kent Leee--'l parades en4 eannttnity. The second half of the year is Winter Guard, Winterdrumlin and our concert band 11. Do you charge admission, membership fee, dues, etc.? Yes X No If yes, please describe: 12. What are your other sources of revenue for this funding year? Source Amount football Food sells 3,500 candy sells 900.00 car was.5PUUU program ads sales 2,000 est Silent auction 5,000 est. Total Needed $ 25,000 plus Total Received $ 15,000 aprox. Balance $_10,000 aprox. 16 ,_, 13. Amount of money requested from the City of La Quinta? $ 5, 000 + 14. Has your organization been funded by the City of La Quinta previously? x Yes No If yes, when 1994? and 2001 ? Amount received ? + 2499 15. Please provide the name and address of the bank in which the organization's funds are kept: Valley Independent Bank 81-790 Highway 111 Indio 92201 16. Please provide the name and title of those individuals authorized to sign on the organization's account (must provide at least two individuals): Name: Title: Pete Latham Bettyann Sherrel Debbi Contreas President Vice President Secutary Ruben ontreras Tresurer 17. Please provide, as an attachment, copies of the last three months bank statements as well as the last year's December bank statement of the organization's checking and savings account. 18. Need Statement. Clearly and plainly state the specific, detailed reason or need for the requested funds and how these funds will be used, if awarded. The Brigarle represents the entire City of La Quinta whereever it preforms in or out of the Valley. School funds are limited and for the programs to continue at a high standard extra funds need to be raised. Expenses include transportation, instruments and repairs, uniform up Reep and loodon out town appeances. Winter Drumline ( 2001 ADLA Campions) and Winterguard will be rep=esen%lne the Ci%y efL T-a Q;A;lnt at thQ WGI lol .,-s t e �� Regional na „o+; +; an -,.�.-.e.l �� in Las Vagas this year. The entire Blackhawk Brigade will be preforming at the City of La Quint 20th Birthday Celebration on April 28tn. Concert Band and Wind Ensemble will be attending competition and festivils including a 2 day preformance at Disneylan 19. Goal Statement. Indicate who will benefit from the use of these funds, and how they will benefit. La Quinta High School students will benefit from the use of thes funds. Your assistance helps the music program continue providi music education and positive group activities to our youth. The of young people representing the entire city at events throughout t' state. 20. Attach a copy of your Program Operating Budget for the current year. We have no formal budget and operate on a "funds available" basis. 21. Non-profit organizations must attach a copy of the organization's current IRS Form 990. We understand that form 990 is filed by the school dist3 c� ; A Network of Community Banks Visit us at www.vibcorp.coni Last statement: September 28, 2001 This statement October 31, 2001 Total days in statement period: 33 LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL BAND BOO P 0 BOX 1234 LA QUINTA CA 92253 Bank of KINGS RIVER v I 8 Stoekdale STATE BANK ....... VALLEY INDEPENDENT BANK Page 1 of 2 0007509952 ( 22 ) Direct inquiries to: 760-775-5658 Valley Independent Bank 81-790 Highway 11 1 Indio CA 92201 NOW YOU CAN BANK ONLINE. VISIT WWW.VIBANK.COM AND FOLLOW THE STEPS. ITS EASY, CONVENIENT AND FREE TO CHECK BALANCES OR TRANSFER FUNDS. SIGN UP NOW AND GET FREE BILL PAYMENT UNTIL JAN. 31, 2002. Small Business Checking Account number 0007509952 Beginning balance $1 1,559.48 Enclosures 22 Total additions 8,416.64 Avg collected balance $1 1,753.00 Total subtractions 5,093.52 Ending balance $14,882.60 CHECKS Number Date Amount Number Date Amount 1485 10-10 200.00 1511 10-05 164.95 1490 * 10-15 35.00 1512 10-15 109.42 1499 * 10-01 1,378.71 1513 10-1 1 16.10 1500 10-01 882.84 1514 10-24 50.00 1501 10-01 456.05 1515 10-23 200.00 1504 * 10-23 110.78 1516 10-23 200.00 1505 10-05 175.00 1517 10-24 125.00 1506 10-15 150.00 1520 * 10-26 200.00 1507 10-04 18.25 1521 1 -23 3 3.6 6 1508 10-1 1 201.37 1522 10-30 19.33 1509 10-1 1 279.98 * Skip in check sequence 1510 10-23 60.68 DEBITS Date Description Subtractions 10- 18 ACH Debit 26.40 HARLAND CHECKS CHK ORDERS 0 110 18 012 01288129120 �n .s � 1 3• ... Notice: See reverse side for important information. Member FDIC A Network of Community Banks Visit us at www.vibcorp.com LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL BAND 800 October 31, 2001 77 Bank of KINGS RIVER StOCkdale STATE BANK ..... ..,... . nivi.n,. -.a.,. ,rn... ,war .... VALLEY INDEPENDENT BANK Page 2 of 2 0007509952 CREDITS Date Description Additions 10-05 Deposit 1,260.00 10-05 Deposit 398.20 10-05 Deposit 310.00 10-05 Deposit 84.00 10-05 ' Deposit 80.00 10-09 Deposit 1,035.25 10-17 Deposit _ 1,753.56 10-26 Deposit 3,495.63 DAILY BALANCES Date Amount 09-28 11,559.48 10-01 8,841.88 10-04 8.823.63 10-05 10,615.88 10-09 1 1,651.13 Date Amount 10-10 11,451.13 10-1 1 10,953.68 10-15 10,659.26 10-17 12,412.82 10-18 12,386.42 Date Amount 10-23 11,781.30 10-24 11,606.30 10-26 14,901.93 10-30 14,882.60 Thank you for banking with Valley Independent Bank 20 4 Notice: See reverse side for important information. Member FDIC A Network of Community Banks Visit us at www.vibcorp.com Last statement: August 31, 2001 This statement: September 28, 2001 Total days in statement period: 28 LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL BAND BOO P 0 BOX 1234 LA QUINTA CA 92253 Bank of KINGS RIVER v JE3 Stockdale STATE BANK .,,...«,.«..... .,,...,,., «om«oe«...«. VAUVINOEPENOENTRANK Page 1 of 2 0007509952 (13) Direct inquiries to: 760-775-5658 Valley Independent Bank 81-790 Highway 1 1 1 Indio CA 92201 NOW YOU CAN BANK ONLINE. VISIT WWW.V I BANK.COM AND FOLLOW THE STEPS. ITS EASY, CONVENIENT AND FREE TO CHECK BALANCES OR TRANSFER FUNDS. SIGN UP NOW AND GET FREE BILL PAYMENT UNTIL JAN. 31, 2002. Small Business Checking Account number 0007509952 Beginning balance Enclosures 13 Total additions Avg collected balance $1 1,282.00 Total subtractions Ending balance CHECKS Number Date Amount 1484 09-06 501.67 1486 * 09-17 200.00 1487 09-24 200.00 1488 09-07 300.00 1489 09— 17 143.55 1491 * 09-21 54.66 1492 09-20 18.25 Number Date $9,704.63 4,692.78 2,837.93 $1 1,559.48 Amount 1493 09-21 485.01 1495 * 09-28 200.00 1496 09-27 200.00 1497 09-28 200.00 1502 * 09-26 316.54 1503 09-27 18.25 * Skip in check sequence CREDITS Date Description Additions 09-07 Deposit 1,784.00 09-07 Deposit 230.00 09-07 Deposit 54.00 09-10 Deposit 137.35 09-18 ' Deposit 1,095.00 09-18 Deposit 468.70 09-18 Deposit 45.00 �} 09-20 Deposit 668.73 09-20 Deposit 200.00 Notice: See reverse side for important information. 6 0J {1 Member FDIC A Network of Community Banks Visit us at www.vibcorp.com LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL BAND BOO September 28, 2001 Date Description 09-20 ' Deposit DAILY BALANCES Bank of KINGS RIVER N/1 E3,, Stockdg& STATE BANK . -. a.,. .— . o. .— VALLEY INDEPENDENT BANK Page 2 of 2 0007509952 Additions 10.00 Date Amount Date Amount Date Amount 08-31 9,704.63 09-17 10,764.76 09-24 12,494.27 09-06 9,202.96 09— 18 _ 12,373.46 09-26 12,177.73 09-07 10,970.96 09-20 13,233.94 09-27 11,959.48 09-10 11,108.31 09-21 12.694.27 09-28 11.559.48 Thank you for banking with Valley Independent Bank Notice: See reverse side for important information. 6 ,k A. Member FDIC A Network of Community Banks Visit us at www.vibcorp.com Last statement: October 31, 2001 This statement: November 30, 2001 Total days in statement period: 30 LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL BAND 600 P 0 BOX 1234 LA QUINTA CA 92253 Bank of KINGS RIVER v j B. Stockdale STATE BANK ,.,, . "• ". I VAUXV INDEPENDENT BANK Page 1 of 2 0007509952 (17) Direct inquiries to: 760-775-5658 Valley Independent Bank 8 1 -790 Highway 1 1 1 Indio CA 92201 NOW YOU CAN 'BANK ONLINE. VISIT WWW .V I BANK.COM AND FOLLOW THE STEPS. ITS NEVER TOO EARLY TO SAVE: OPEN A HOLIDAY ACCOUNT NOW FOR 2002. SAVE FOR THE SUMMER WITH OUR PREFERRED CHECKING/SUMMER SAVINGS ACCOUNTS. Small Business Checking Account number 0007509952 Beginning balance $14,882.60 Enclosures 17 Total additions 1,546.62 Avg collected balance $13,810.00 Total subtractions 3,806.97 Ending balance $12,622.25 CHECKS Number Date Amount Number Date Amount 1519 11-08 350.00 1532 11-19 437.25 1523 * 1 1-05 28.98 1533 1 1- 16 9.65 1524 1 1-08 61.21 1534 1 1 -20 164.96 1525 11-20 500.00 1535 11-16 215.00 1526 11-09 113.63 1536 11-27 382.50 1528 * 1 1-09 585.35 1541 * 1 1-30 58.25 1529 1 1-15 52.60 1544 * 1 1 -30 75.00 1530 1 1-14 225.00 1545 1 1-30 32.24 1531 1 1-21 515.35 * Skip in check sequence CREDITS Date Description Additions 1 1-14 Deposit 868.50 1 1 - 14 Deposit 76.94 1 1-23 Deposit 561.18 1 1-23 Deposit 40.00 b Notice: See reverse side for important information. Member FDIC A Network of Community Banks Visit us at www.vibcorp.com Bank of KINGS RIVER v JE3 Stockdale STATE BANK VALLEY INDEPENDENT BANK LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL BAND BOO November 30, 2001 DAILY BALANCES Date Amount Date Amount Date 10-31 14,882.60 1 1 - 15 14,41 1.27 1 1 -23 1 1-05 14,853.62 1 1- 16 14, 186.62 1 1-27 1 1-08 14,442.41 1 1- 19 13,749.37 1 1 -30 1 1-09 13,743.43 1 1-20 13,084.41 1 1- 14 14,463.87 1 1 -2 1 12,569.06 Thank you for banking with Valley Independent Bank 2=r Notice: See reverse side for important information. Page 2 of 2 0007509952 Amount 13.170.24 12,787.74 12.622.25 Member FDIC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - 1 -1 ,� � . - _ � . • - _ ,� •"1 1.1 �- � . • . • �1 l /1 �`. i . � -. • „� ....-y ,� s .r �h t,' J r, _ - ._ �_ �'� •_ " _ �-- .� .. ,� -. .— ... 't.r• �, �,. -, �� i� �.� � ''. ' � � r d .� _� _..._Y. 1�� Proposed Budget for La Quinta High School Band Booster 2001/2002 Income: Band Fee's Fund Raiser's (Candy Sales, Car Washes, Homecoming, Football Snack Bar, Auctions) Vending Machine ( Both Candy and Soda Machine) Donations Expense Awards Band Camp Supplies Competition Fee's Transportation( Busses, Trailer registration, , etc, etc) Band Booster Operation (Office supplies, Postage, P.O. Box Rent) Clothing (Uniforms, Cleaning, Tailoring, T-Shirts, Shoes) Consultants Food ( Lunches, Banquet, Snacks) Fund Raiser ( Candy, BBQ, Auction, Flower, etc, etc) Loans Instrument Repair Music ( Music Supplies) TOTAL $129000 $ 8,600 $ 2,000 $ 3,000 $25,600 $ 1,100 $ 1,000' ' $ 1,500. $ 2,000 $ 800 $ 7,000 $ 2,000 $ 1,800 $ 3,500 $ 1,000 $ 500 $ 1,000 $23,200 6 01/30/2002 17:23 17607771231 LQ COMMtUhJITY SERtfICE ATTACHMENT 6 CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT FISCAL YEAR 41-4� Name of Organization: Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District - Amount Requested: $14,926.17 Contact Person: Don Martin Mailing Address: 45 871 -Clinton-Street- City: IO.dio State: CA Zip Code: 92201 Phone No.: (760) 347 3484 501(03 Taxpayer I.D. Number: Date Submitted: January 31 200 Applications will receive consideration without discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin or disability. 1 01 f 30/ 2002 17: 23 17607771231 LQ COMMUNITY SERVICE PATE 02 COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT APPLICATION (Must be typed) 1. What is the overall purpose or goal of your organization? We provide recreation and ark activities for the following areas: Quinta, Palm Desert, Indio, Coachella, Indian Wells Rancho Mirage, Thousand Palms, Bermuda Dunes, Thermal, Oasis Me a, S^lf-nn I.Sen & Lodi Hills. 2. How long has your organization been in existence? 52 Years 1 Months 3. Describe in general the activities or services of your organization: Provide recreation activities and maintain parks and buildings thrquilh out the Coachella Valley. 4. How many people does your organization currently serve? Combined No. of Youth No. of Adults No. of Seniors Total 390,000 plus 5. How many people do you intend to serve during this Fiscal Year? Combined No. of Youth No. of Adults No. of Seniors Total 320,000 plus 6. How many people served this Fiscal Year will be La Quinta residents? Combined No. of Youth No. of Adults No. of Seniors_ Total 2 -9400 7. How many paid employees/volunteers does your organization employ? Full time employees 26 Part time employees 90-150 Volunteers 20 6. Describe how your organization is managed and governed. We are a Special District organized under the State of California Public Resources Code 69 01,E 30/ 2002 1 7 : 23 17607771231 LQ COMMUNITY SERVICE PAGE 03 9. Please provide information on your Executive Board members or contact person: Nam e i le Home Address Phone Joanne Gilbert President 45-871 Clinton St.. Indio 147-1484 Frank Duran Vice President 45-871 Clinton St. In - Kay Ladner Director 45-871 Cl.fntgn St.- T_.nrlin 3+47-3 UF--- Gordon Jensen Director 45-871 Clinton St., Indio 347-3484 Daniel Garza 12jrectnr 45-&71 10. What is your annual schedule of events, and during what months does your organization operate? We are open every month. ThP lei stri rt hac nlun.erp4-j& Pxrpnts i.e—.. child rare, youth and adult sports., nastics s ;.11 1 1 . Do you charge admission, membership fee, dues, etc.? xx Yes No If yes, please describe: Yearly myarinus nmghn>>t thn 12. What are your other sources of revenue for this funding year? Source Amount Quimby, State Grant General Total Needed $14,926.17 Total Received $ -0- Balance $14, 926.17 r 01/30/2002 17:23 17607771231 LO COMMUNITY SERVICE PAGE 04 13. Amount of money requested from the City of La Quinta? $ 14,926.17 14. Has your organization been funded by the City of La Quinta previously? xx Yes No If yes, when yearly Oktoberf ar Amount received Approx. 15. Please provide the name and address of the bank in which the organization's funds are kept: PFF Bank & Trust 78- La 16. Please provide the name and title of those individuals authorized to sign on the organization's account (must provide at least two individuals): Name: Title: Don Martin Laura McGalliard General Managpr Superintendent 17. Please provide, as an attachment, copies of the last three months bank statements as well as the last year's December bank statement of the organization's checking and savings account. Per Do2ie Horvitz see copy of dget 18. Need Statement. Clearly and plainly state the specific, detailed reason or need for the requested funds and how these funds will be used, if awarded. The Disttict is re uestin City to citie.'s building and planning permit fees IS A U� 01 / 30/ 2002 17: 23 17607771231 LQ COMMUNITY SERVICE PAGE 05 19. Goal Statement. Indicate who will benefit from the use of these funds, and how they will benefit. The residents of La Oui u a new $2.O00,000 p1„G park. 20. Attach a copy of your Program Operating Budget for the current year. On file With the City Clerk 21. Non-profit organizations must attach a copy of the organization's current IRS Form 990. EXHIBIT "A" "ALTERNATE" COACHELLA VALLEY RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT FRANCES HACK COMMUNITY PARK - LA QUINTA "CONCEPTUAL" PROJECT BUDGET October 10,2001 NEW REMODEL I. CONSTRUCTION COSTS A. Community Center Building/ Trellis - _ Demolition $ 32,000.00 $ 20,000.00 Construction - 6,000 SF x $107/SF $ 642,000.00 $ 185,000.00 B. Restroom Building - - Demolition $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Construction $ 67,500.00 $ 67,500.00 C. Shade Structure _ _ Construction $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 D. Picnic Pavilions (3 Total) $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 E. Signage Monuments (4 Total) $ 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 F. Sportsfield Lighting $ 85,000.00 $ 8500.00 G. Amphitheater Stage & Trellis $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 H. Memorial Garden Trellis $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 I. Flag Poles (4 Each) $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 J. Landscape/ Irrigation $ 260,000.00 $ 260,000.00 K. Hardscape $ 85,000.00 $ 85,000.00 TOTAL $ 1,4969500.00 $ 1,027,500.00 II. CONTRACTOR FEES A. Supervision @ (6%) $ 42,570.00 $ 12,337.00 B. Contingency @ (15% new) @ (20% remod.) $ 1069425.00 $ 41,122.00 C. Contractor Fee @ (18%) $ 127,710.00 $ 37,010.00 D. Bonds @ 10% (Total Bldg. Construction) $ 70,950.00 $ 42,000.00 TOTAL $ 3479655.00 $ 132,469.00 III. SOFT COSTS A. Architect $ 49,000.00 $ 23,000.00 B. Structural Engineer $ 149000.00 $ 8,000.00 C. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Engineer $ 99500.00 $ 4,000.00 D. Landscape Architect $ 309000.00 $ 30,000.00 E. Electrical Engineer (Site/Fields/Amph.) $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 F. Civil Engineer $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 G. Survey $ 8,000.00 $ 7,000.00 H. Geo Technical $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 I. Project/ Construction Management $ 72,000.00 $ 72,000.00 TOTAL $ 212,500.00 1 $ 174,000.00 2C7 IV. SITE FURNISHINGS A. Sidewalk Lighting $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 B. Benches Reuse Reuse C. Signage $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 D. Drinking Fountains $ 35,000.00 $ 3,000.00 E. Bar-B-Ques Reuse Reuse F. Fencing TBD TBD G.'Bollards $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 H. Cell Tower N/A N/A TOTAL $ + 533,000.00 $ 539000.00 V. FEES A. Building Department (La Quinta) TBD TBD B. Engineering/ Public Works (La Quinta) TBD TBD C. CVWD TBD TBD D. IDD TBD TBD TOTAL TBD TBD GRAND TOTAL (I-M $ 2,1099655.00 $ 1,386,969.00 VARIANCE (+722,686.00) (-722,686.00) IS t m z ,E-:-; low Q u7 u z 9 4 �rwihr w .r •aw•rr�. �M4iMM0 � �MINMI1� - iYlllO 'S10311H38b ® vi vwnZUNON vOiNanv Maim NOISS30NOO - MHVd HOVH SIONVM:J 6 z Q J O ,L V z Q _J D z O N w v z O v v1~ 1 (8(.) i- J �7 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 5, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: Consideration of Participation in the Desert Senior Inspiration Awards PUBLIC HEARING: Program RECOMMENDATION: Approve the City of La Quinta's participation in the "Desert Senior Inspiration Awards" Program and the selection of Robert Tyler as the City's nominee for the program. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The "Desert Senior Inspiration Awards" program is requesting the City purchase a table for ten people at the event for $250 and contribute $175 toward the award for the recipient, for a total of $425, as provided in Attachment 1. Account #101-202- 609-000 has funds to sponsor this event. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The "Desert Senior Inspiration Awards" program was formerly known as the "Living for Your 90's" Senior Inspiration Award program, and provides an opportunity to recognize and honor outstanding seniors throughout the Coachella Valley. Robert Tyler (Attachment 2) has been selected by the "Friends of the La Quinta Senior Center" as an outstanding senior candidate who has met the following criteria: the honoree should be at least 70 years old; reside in the City of La Quinta; demonstrate involvement in community affairs for a lengthy period of time; and personify a healthy and active attitude and lifestyle. Attachment 3 provides a brief biography on Mr. Tyler. This information will be printed in the program provided at the Senior Inspiration Luncheon. The Senior Inspiration Luncheon will be held on April 11, 2002. The City of La Quinta has sponsored a table and a recipient at the Senior Inspiration Luncheon since the program's inception in 1993. 1 T FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the City of La Quinta's participation in the "Desert Senior Inspiration Awards" program and the selection of Robert Tyler as the City's nominee for the program; or 2. Do not approve the City of La Quinta's participation in the "Desert Senior Inspiration Awards" program; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Resp ctfully ubmitted, Dodie HorvibrIvmmunity Services Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Letter from Supervisor Roy Wilson Regarding the "Desert Senior Inspiration Awards" Program 2. Friends of the La Quinta Senior Center Letter 3. Robert Tyler Biography S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.182.Desert Senior Awards Program 2002.wpd ATTACHMENT 1 RIVERSIDE OFFICE: 4080 Lemon Street, 14th Floor Riverside, CA 92502-1647 (909) 955-1040 Fax (909) 955-2194 John Pena, Mayor City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear John: [HIM 1 111 _11�Ol'l 'P e� C�mrV��r} SUPERVISOR ROY WILSON FOURTH DISTRICT January 02, 2002 DISTRICT OFFICEA':L1ILTv; ADDkt.1.. 46-200 Oasis Street. Ste. 318 Indio, CA 92201-5933 (760)863-8211 Fax (760) 863-8905 The County of Riverside and the nine incorporated cities of the Coachella Valley have begun planning for this year's Senior Inspiration Awards. Formerly known as the "Living For Your 90s" Senior Inspiration Awards. The event will be held on April 11 2002 at the Marriott Desert Springs in Palm Desert. We eagerly look forward to another successful event in the tradition of prior year's successes. Each City's involvement in the selection process and participation in the Program is essential. We are counting on your participation to make next year's event a great success. To this end, we are again asking each City to select one outstanding senior recipient or a couple who meet(s) the following criteria: o The honoree should be a least 70 years old or older; o Reside in your city; o Be involved in community affairs for a lengthy period of time; o Personify a healthy, active, and contributing attitude and lifestyle This year, we are also asking that each city provide a brief summary (maximum 150 words) on why you (the City) chose that person. This information will be incorporated into the Program, which will be distributed to all attendees at the Awards Luncheon. As in previous years, we are requesting hat each city purchase at least one table, at a cost of $250, for the event and contribute $175 towards the awards. We are hoping to receive this no later than February 1 St. Senior Inspiration Awards is sponsored by each of the nine incorporated cities and the County of Riverside. At this time, we are seeking corporate sponsors for this event. A letter has been enclosed for potential contributors that you may be aware for in you city or you can contact Leticia De Lara in my office at (760) 863-8211 should you requiFe any further information about Sponsorships or have any questions. We look forward to your participation in this most unique tribute to our seniors. Enclosure Sincerely, ( 1 ,r C Roy W i lson , Fourth District Su,�rvisor INTERNET: district4(q7)co.riverside.ca.us ATTACHMENT 2 Friends of the La Quinta Senior Center Board Members January 23, 2002 Robert Alcala President Fred Mosher 1st Vice President Richard Dahl Treasurer Sally Redewill Secretary Dane Hooper Board Member Joan Forest Board Member Regina Smith Board Member The Friends of the La Quinta Senior Center" is pleased to nominate Robert T. Tyler as their selection for the 2002 Senior Inspiration Award. The nomination was made at the regular board meeting held Wednesday, January 23, 2002. Fred Mosher, Vice President 19Ii PO Box 1504 - La Quinta, CA 92253 �rJ Tax Exempt 1. D. #33-0261 S11 ATTACHMENT 3 Robert first became involved in La Quinta community activities in 1994, primarily as a result of � the Quinterra build -out "compatibility" issue. Since that time, he has been an active volunteer in many local organizations and civic functions, as follows: • 9/94 to Present: Instructor, HARP 55ALIVE Mature Driver Course. Initially taught at various venues throughout the Coachella Valley. Has taught exclusively at the La Quinta Senior Center since mid-1998. (78 classes and 2178 students thus far) • 6/95 to 1 /96: Appointed Commissioner, La Quinta Human Services Commission • 1/96 to Present: Appointed Commissioner, La Quinta Planning Commission (Chairman, 1998/99) -• 4/95 to 5/99: Co -Chairman, Greater Coachella Valley Soap Box Derby • 9/97 to Present: Commissioner, Palm Springs Airport. Commission, representing La Quinta (currently Vice-Chaunian� • 3/97 to 12/00: Represented La Quinta on the Imperial Irrigation District Power Consumers Advisory Committee • 1998 to present: Election Judge • Member of the La Quinta team in the 2000 Relay for Life, fund raiser for Breast Cancer Research • 3/01 to present: Quartermaster, La Quinta Post 855, Veterans of Foreign Wars. • Lastly, and by far the most rewarding, since 10/99, Louise and Robert have been Foster Parents. Thus far, they have provided around -the -clock TLC to a total of sk infant foster children. % 4 In addition to the above, Robert is a regular attendee and frequent participant at La Quinta City Council meetings, as well as many other County and Community meetings of interest. 6 Ur AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 5, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Consideration of Redevelopment/Economic PUBLIC HEARING: Development Consultant Services RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to negotiate an extension to the City 's contract with the Rosenow Spevacek Group (RSG) for redevelopment and economic development services. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None for this action. Funding for the referenced services is contained within the City's annual budget. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The City of La Quinta retained the Rosenow Spevacek Group (RSG) to perform redevelopment and economic development consulting services pursuant to a contract services agreement in March 1994. RSG was selected upon culmination of a request for proposals process. The original contract had a three-year term. In February 1997, the City Council authorized staff to negotiate an extension to RSG's contract, which was approved for a five-year term by the City Council in March 1997 (Attachment 1). During the contract term, RSG has performed duties for the City of La Quinta as outlined within the contract including redevelopment, economic development, and housing services. RSG has competently performed or assisted City staff with the following duties: 19 Redevelopment • Preparation of the Agency's Annual Budget • Preparation of the Agency's Statement of Indebtedness • Preparation of the Agency's Annual Work Program and Annual State Controller's Report • Update of the Five -Year Implementation Plan Economic Development • Request for Proposals preparation • Developer Project Proposal and Pro Forma Analysis • Preparation of the Economic Development Plan • Formulation of the Small Business Development Plan • Participation in Developer/User Negotiations • Forecasting Project -Specific Municipal Revenues and Projected Municipal Expenses • Projecting Project -Specific Returns to the City/Agency • Structuring of Disposition and Development, Owner Participation, and Affordable Housing Agreements • Preparing Summary Reports for Specific Agreements Housing • Preparation of the Redevelopment Housing Compliance Plan • Structured Specific Housing Projects • Analyze Housing Proposals and Pro Formas • Administer the Assessment Subsidy Program • Formulated the Housing Rehabilitation and Second Trust Deed Mortgage Loan Program • Reviewed and Qualified Homebuyers for Agency Second Trust Deed Mortgages RSG has also provided the City and Agency with fiscal consultant services (i.e., tax increment projections and verification, bond issue projections, assessment appeal audits, etc.) and ongoing City/Agency cash flow oversight. In October 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution 96-80 establishing rules and regulations governing the solicitation and selection of consulting firms. Section 9(a) of that Resolution states that "The City Council may authorize the City Manager to bypass competitive selection procedures in the renewal or renegotiation of existing contracts for continuing services." 197 002 Consistent with the City's consultant selection procedures, and in consideration of RSG's extensive involvement in City/Agency affairs, staff recommends that the City Council authorizes the City Manager to negotiate an extension to the existing contract with RSG. This contract extension, once negotiated, would be brought back for City Council/Agency Board consideration. Alternatively, the City Council may authorize staff to initiate the formal consultant selection process (draft and distribute a request for proposals). FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Authorize staff to negotiate an extension to the City's contract with RSG for redevelopment and economic development services; or 2. Authorize staff to prepare and distribute a request for proposals soliciting redevelopment and economic development services; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, L Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Contract Services Agreement with RSG w ATTACHMENT 1 CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMEN jL This AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (the "Agreement"), is made and entered into by and among the CITY OF LA QUINTA (the "Municipality"), a California municipal corporation, the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency"), a California public corporation, and ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. (The "Contractor"). The parties hereto agree as follows: 1. SERVICES OF CONTRACTOR 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of the Agreement, the Contractor shall provide those services related to Redevelopment, Housing, and Economic Development, as specified in the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference (the "services" or "work"). Contractor warrants that all services will be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner in accordance with the standards prevalent in the industry for such services. Services will be provided to the Municipality and to the Agency. For convenience, the Agency and the Municipality are referred to herein as the "City". 1.2 Contractor's Proposal. The Scope of Services shall include the Contractor's proposal or bid, if any, which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. 1.3 Compliance with Law. All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, regulations and laws of the Municipality, the Agency, and any and all Federal, State or local governmental agency of competent jurisdiction. 1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees, and Assessments. Contractor shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Contractor shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. 1.5 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Contractor warrants that (a) it has thoroughly investigated and considered the work to be performed, (b) it has investigated the site of the work and fully acquainted itself with the conditions there existing, (c) it has carefully considered how the work should be performed, and (d) it fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the work under this Agreement. Should the Contractor discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the work or as represented by the City, it shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Contractor's risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer (as defined in Section 4.2 hereof). 193 oo15 1.6 Care of Work. The Contractor shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers and other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to person, or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City's own negligence. The performance of services by Contractor shall not relieve Contractor from any obligation to correct any incomplete, inaccurate or defective work at no further cost to the City, when such inaccuracies are due to the negligence of Contractor. 1.7 Additional Services. In accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Contractor shall perform services in addition to those specified in the Scope of Services, (Exhibit "A") when directed in writing to do so by the Contract Officer, provided that Contractor shall not be required to perform any additional services without compensation. 2.0 COMPENSATION 2.1 Contract Sum. For the services rendered pursuant to the Agreement, the Contractor shall be compensated in accordance with the "Schedule of Compensation" attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by this reference. The method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation will include payment for time and materials based upon the Contractor's rates as specified in Exhibit `B", or such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation (Exhibit `B"). Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, transportation expenses, telephone expense, premiums for bonds and insurance, and similar costs and expenses when and if specified in the Schedule of Compensation (Exhibit `B"). 2.2 Method of Payment. Any month in which Contractor wishes to receive payment, Contractor shall submit to the City no later than the tenth (10') working day of such month, in the form approved by the Contract Officer, an invoice for services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. Such invoice shall (1) describe in detail the services provided, including time and materials, (2) specify each staff member who has provided services and the number of hours assigned to each such staff member, and (3) indicate the total expenditures to date. Such invoice shall contain a certification by a principal member of Contractor specifying that the payment requested is for work performed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. , The Municipality or the Agency, whichever is appropriate based upon the election of the Agency and the Municipality, will pay Contractor for all expenses stated thereon which are approved by the Municipality or the Agency pursuant to this Agreement no later that the last working day of the month. 3.0 PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. ter 1i. 3.2 Schedule of Performance. All services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed diligently and within the performance of this Agreement. 3.3. Force Majeure. All time periods specified for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemic, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargos, acts of any governmental agency other than City, and unusually severe weather, if the Contractor shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contracting Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contracting Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay and extend the time for performing their services for the period of the forced delay when and if in his judgment such delay is justified, and the Contracting Officer's determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Section 7.8 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect for five (5) years, from the date of the execution of this Agreement. 4.0 COORDINATION OF WORK 4.1 Representative of Contractor. The following principals of Contractor are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Contractor authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: a. Frank Spevacek b. Kathleen Rosenow It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of the Agreement for directing all activities of Contractor and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. The foregoing principals may not be changed by Contractor and no other personnel may be assigned to perform the service required hereunder without the express written approval of City. 4.2 Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be the Assistant City Manager or such other person as may be designated by the City Manager of the Municipality. The Contract Officer has been authorized to act on behalf of the Agency and the Municipality for the purposes of this Agreement. It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Contractor shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. 4.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Contractor, its principals and employees were a substantial �01 007 inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Contractor shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be assigned or transferred, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of City. 4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Contractor, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth. Contractor shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. 4.5 City Cooperation. The City shall provide Contractor with any plans, publications, reports, statistics, records or other data or information pertinent to services to be performed hereunder which are reasonably available to the City. 5.0 INSURANCE INDEMNIFICATION AND BONDS. 5.1 Insurance. The Contractor shall procure and maintain, at its cost, and submit concurrently with its execution of the Agreement, public liability and property damage insurance against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property resulting from Contractor's acts or omissions rising out of or related to Contractor's performance under this Agreement. The insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that the coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Contractor's performance hereunder and neither the City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to any such loss. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming the City and its officers and employees as additional insured shall be delivered to and approved by the City prior to commencement of the services hereunder. The amount of insurance required hereunder shall be determined by the Contract Sum in accordance with the following table: _-F- Contract Sum Covers a(personal injury/property damage) Less than $50,000 $100,000 per individual; $300,000 per occurrence $5011000-$300,000 $250,000 per individual; $500,000 per occurrence Over $300,000 $500,000 per individual; $1,000,000 per occurrence The Contractor shall also carry automobile liability insurance of $1,000,000 per accident against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property arising out of the use of any automobile by the Contractor, its officers, any directly or indirectly employed by the Contractor, any subcontractor, and agents or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, arising directly or indirectly out of or related to Contractor's performance under this Agreement. The term "automobile" includes, but is not limited to, a land motor vehicle, trailer or semi -trailer designed for travel on public roads. The automobile insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Contractor's performance hereunder and neither the City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to such loss. A certificate 008 evidencing the foregoing and naming the City and its officers and employees as additional insured shall be delivered to and approved by the City prior to commencement of the services hereunder. Contractor shall also carry Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with State Workers' Compensation laws. The Contractor shall procure professional errors and omissions liability insurance in the amount acceptable to the City. All insurance required by the Section shall be kept in effect during the term of this Agreement and shall not be cancelable without thirty (30) days' written notice of proposed cancellation to City. The procuring of such insurance or the delivery of policies or certificates evidencing the same shall not be construed as a limitation of Contractor's obligation to indemnify the City, its officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors or agents. 5.2 Indemnification. The Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees, representatives and agents, from and against any and all actions, suits, proceedings, claims, demands, losses, costs, and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys' fees, for injury to or death of person(s), for damage to property (including property owned by the City) and for errors and omissions committed by Contractor, its officers, anyone directly or indirectly employed by Contractor, any subcontractor, and agents or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, arising directly or indirectly out of or related to. Contractor's performance under this Agreement, except to the extent of such loss as may be caused by City's own active negligence, sole negligence or willful misconduct, or that of its officers or employees. 5.3 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies the City may have if Contractor fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City, at its sole option: a. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement. b. Order the Contractor to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payments(s) which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. C. Terminate the Agreement. Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to any other remedies the City may have and are not the exclusive remedies for Contractor's failure to maintain or secure appropriate policies or endorsements. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to person or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractors' performance of work under this Agreement. 6.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS 6.1 Reports. Contractor shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. 6.2 Records. Contractor shall keep such books and records as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the cost and the performance of such services. Books and records pertaining to costs shall be kept and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all reasonable times, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. 6.3 Ownership of Documents. Originals of all drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents, and other materials, whether in hard copy or electronic form, which are prepared by Contractor, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement, shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon the termination of this Agreement or upon the earlier request of the Contract Officer, and Contractor shall have not claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership of the documents and materials hereunder. Contractor may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Contractor shall ensure all subcontractors to assign City any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Contractor fails to secure such assignment, Contractor shall indemnify City for all damages suffered thereby. 6.4 Release of Documents. The drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials prepared by Contractor in the performance of services under this Agreement shall not be released publicly without the prior written approval of the Contract Officer or as required by law. Contractor shall not disclose to any other private entity or person any information regarding the activities of the City, except as required by law or as authorized by the City. 7.0 ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT 7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Contractor covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. 7.2 Disputes. In the event of any dispute arising under this Agreement, the injured party shall notify the injuring party in writing of its contentions by submitting a claim therefor. The injured party shall continue performing its obligation hereunder so long as the injuring party commences to cure such default within ten (10) days of service of such notice and completes the cure of such default within forty-five (45) days after service of the notice, or such longer period as may Cl l_ 0 be permitted by the Contract Officer; provided that if the default is an immediate danger to the health, safety and general welfare, the City may take such immediate action as the City deems warranted. Compliance with the provisions of this Section shall be a condition precedent to termination of the Agreement for cause and to any legal action, and such compliance shall not be a waiver of any party's right to take legal action in the event that the dispute is not cured, provided that nothing herein shall limit City's right to terminate this Agreement without cause pursuant to Section 7.8. 7.3 Retention of Funds. City may withhold from any monies payable to Contractor sufficient funds to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities or damages it reasonably believes were suffered by City due to the default of Contractor in the performance of the services required by the Agreement. 7.4 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a nondefaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. City's consent or approval of any act by Contractor requiring City's consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary City's consent to or approval of any subsequent act of Contractor. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 7.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, at law or at equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. 7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Agreement, except as specifically provided in the following Section 7.9 for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Contractor. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Contractor shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Contractor shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to receipt of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation (Exhibit "B") or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. 7.8 Termination for Default of Contractor. If termination is due to the failure of the Contractor to fulfill its obligation under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provision of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Contractor shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Contractor for the purpose of setoff or partial payment of the amounts owned the City as previously stated in Section 7.3. 7.9 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party arising out of or in connections with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit from the losing party. 8.0 CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION 8.1 Non -liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Contractor, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City of for any amount which may become due to the Contractor or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of the Agreement. 8.2 Conflict of Interest. No officer or employee of the City shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which effects his personal interest or the interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. The Contractor warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement. 8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination. Contractor covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, disability or ancestry in the performance of the Agreement. Contractor shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, age or ancestry. 9.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9.1 Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, communication either party desires or is required to give to the other parties or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail to the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty-eight (48) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section 9.1. To Municipality: CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Attention: Mark Weiss Assistant City Manager To Agency: La Quinta Redevelopment Agency 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Attention: Mark Weiss Assistant Executive Director To Contractor: ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. 540 N. Golden Circle, Suite 305 Santa Ana, California 92705-3914 Attention: Frank Spevacek 9.2 Integrated Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the parties and all previous understandings, negotiations and agreements are integrated into and superseded by this Agreement. 9.3 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the parties by an instrument in writing signed by all parties. 9.4 Severability. In the event that any or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in the Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceable shall not effect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder. 9.5 Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that by so executing this Agreement the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates stated below. CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation Dated: By:� CITY MANAGER "MUNICIPALITY APPROVED AS TO FORM: ,a �. L4�9��- City Attorney LA DEVEGENCY Dated: ByIEXECUTIVE DIRECTOR "Agency" AT ST: ecretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Agency Counsel Dated: BY: Name: Frank J, Spextacek Title: Principal "CONTRACTOR" 20 zoo 014 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES Pursuant to the Contractor's proposal dated January 27, 1994, the Contractor shall provide planning, management, and financial services for the following activities: • Redevelopment project adoption/amendment activities. • Economic development strategy plans. • Housing program development and implementation. • Housing program administration. • Disposition and development agreement/owner participation/affordable housing agreement structuring. • Property acquisition services. • Agency reporting requirements including statement of indebtedness, annual work program and budget, ten-year Agency financing plan, five-year Agency implementation plan. • Verification of tax increment revenue and tax increment revenue projections. • Bond fiscal consultant letters. • Preparation of required staff reports, documents, transmittals, and correspondence. • Presentations, as required. The Contractor shall complete all necessary tasks (within the portfolio of their services) to undertake these activities. All work tasks shall be assigned by the Contract Officer. 203 SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION Five (5) Year Contract Term For the five (5) year term of the Agreement, the Contractor shall invoice the City for services rendered on a time -and -materials basis pursuant to the fee schedule and billing policies outlined below; all services rendered shall be with Exhibit A. Scope of Services, of the Agreement, and will be subject to prior approval or assignment by the Agency Executive Director or his designee. Fee Schedule. The following Fee Schedule shall be in effect for the five (5) year term of the Agreement: Principal/Director $100 Associate $ 85 Senior Analyst $ 75 Analyst $ 65 Word Processing/Computer $ 3 5 Clerical $ 24 Clerical Services. The Contractor shall not charge the Agency for clerical services involving word processing, document assembly, and graphics preparation resulting from Contractor -generated documents, reports, letters, and memos. The Contractor, however, shall be reimbursed for clerical service costs relating to Contractor -generated mailings in excess of six (6) pieces, and document reproduction and assembly involving six (6) or more copies. Reimbursement for Out -of -Pocket Expenses. The Contractor shall not charge for mileage, parking, telephone/fax expense, nor copies/postage involving five (5) or less documents/pieces. The Contractor shall, however, be reimbursed for additional insured certificates, messenger services, Express Mail/Federal Express costs, and'copies/postage involving six (6) or more documents/pieces. The Contractor shall also be reimbursed for extraordinary out-of-pocket expenses, such as air fare, meals, and lodging expenses associated with travel required for client projects (for example, bond rating agency/insurance company presentations). These costs are charged at actual expense with no surcharge and are incurred only with prior client authorization. 21.0 T 6 0 44f 4 4 ado& AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: 6 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 5, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITL STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Mid -Year Budget Report For Fiscal Year 2001 /02 RECOMMENDATION: Approve an increase in Estimated Revenues for Project Area No. 1 and 2 totaling $5,013,775; Approve the New Appropriations as outlined in Attachment No. 1 of this report totaling $586,425 from the General Fund, and $1,923,894 in RDA Project Areas No. 1 and 2; Approve the revised reduction in Investment Earnings as outlined in this report totaling $21 1,600; Receive and file the Mid -Year Budget Report. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: A comprehensive report is prepared annually at Mid -Year to inform the City Council as to the financial position of the City and expenditures to date as compared to the Budget as established by the City Council. The Mid -Year Report involves a financial assessment of City operations presented to the Council during the fiscal year. This report provides information on General Fund and RDA revenues, operations, capital projects and requests for budget transfers and/or new appropriations. This analysis provides the Council the opportunity to monitor year-to-date revenues and expenditures and make mid -course adjustments necessary as the result of modified program requirements. 2141 ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: For the most part, expenditures are distributed evenly throughout the fiscal year. At Mid -Year December 31, 2001, it is expected that about 41 % of the funds budgeted will have been expended. Revenues, for a variety of reasons (such as Sales Tax reporting lag and seasonal Transient Occupancy Tax), tend to be received unevenly throughout the year. In order to provide a more accurate comparison of revenues and expenditures at Mid -Year, selected revenues„) have been accrued to reflect the month they were earned. For some of these revenues, the estimate for the remainder of the year was completed by utilizing a weighted average analysis. If revenues were received in the month they were earned, the earned figure reflects how much would have been collected in the first six months. Major expenditures such as law enforcement have also been accrued to reflect a six month cost. The year-to-date General Fund revenue/expenditure status is as follows: GENERAL RiNn Estimated Mi I Year End 12/31/01 12/31/01 I I Year End I Variance Description Budget YTD Actual % Earned % Estimate over/(Under) Revenue I $14,332,9301 $6,797,8591 47.43%1 $7,456,0591 52.02%1 $15,288,9201 $955,990 Expenditure I 14,939,2841 1 6,184,4181 1 41.40% I I 6,939,4181 1 46.45% 1 I 15,175,7091 236,425 Revenue Over (Under) Expenditure ($606,354) $613,441 -101.17% $516,641 -85.20% $113,211 $719,565 (1)For the purposes of this report certain revenues have been selected due to their cyclical nature and/or their significance to the overall revenue picture. The following revenues have been selected to be accrued and the applicable analysis regarding these revenues are provided as Attachment 2: Sales Tax; Property Tax; Tax Increment; Transient Occupancy Tax; Motor Vehicle In Lieu Tax; and interest revenue. In addition, the revenue and expenditure summaries from July to December are included in Attachment 2 as support. Based on the accrued revenues at Mid -Year, the General Fund revenue is showing signs of exceeding the budget estimate at year-end by approximately $950,000. The General Fund's improvement is due to substantial activity in one-time local construction licenses, fees and permits of $900,000, an excess of budgeted Sales Tax of $282,500, an increase in parking fines and motor vehicle violations of $20,000 and a decrease of $245,000 in Transient Occupancy Tax. Additionally, the General Fund's anticipated expenditures are estimated to be at or slightly above 21 the budgeted amount. Staff is recommending a continued conservative approach to expenditures during the second half of this fiscal year. With Mid -Year adjustments, including new general fund appropriations in the amount of $586,424 (detail provided on Attachment 1), it is projected that the General Fund's revenue will exceed expenditures by approximately $1 13,000 at the end of the fiscal year. Revenue General Fund Revenue As indicated in the chart below, the General Fund actual revenues are at 47.4% for Mid -Year. Earned or accrued revenues are approximately 52%, as identified on the chart on the previous page. Since the City's revenue is seasonalized (i.e., Sales Tax, Transient Occupancy Tax) and we receive approximately 60% of our revenue in the second half of the year, the year end estimate exceeds the budget by 6.6%. Provided as part of Attachment 2 is the December 31, 2001 General Fund Revenue Detail for the City. GENERAL FUND REVENUE SUMMARY Description Budget Amount Received % Received Taxes $8,701,200 $3,145,738 36.15% License & Permits I 819,6001 984,6121 120.13% Fees I 1,208,4751 904,2571 74.83% Intergovernmental I 1,758,6051 824,0161 46.86% Interest I 1,535,6001 932,4001 60.72% Miscellaneous I 27,7001 6,8351 24.68% Transfer In 281,750 0 0.00% TOTALS $14,382,930 $6,797,859 47.43% Many municipal revenues are not collected evenly over a 12-month period. Property taxes and other revenues (such as State subventions) are often subject to distribution schedules that are not on a month -to -month basis. Even revenue that is collected more uniformly may also be subject to seasonal highs and lows (such as Transient Occupancy Tax) that would impact year-to-date benchmark percentages. Taxes Overall, general fund tax revenues are at 36% of the budget estimate. The majority of Property Taxes are received from the County in January and May, and therefore, are shown as minor receipts at Mid -Year. It is estimated that Sales Tax 213 01 revenues will exceed the budget by over $282,500 and Transient Occupancy Taxes will be below the budgeted amount by approximately $245,000. Licenses, Fees & Permits Development activity has been higher than the budget estimate. Revenue in the License and Fee category and Permit category is approximately 120% and 75%, respectively, of the budget estimate as of December 31, 2001. It is anticipated that the City will receive approximately $900,000 over the budget estimate of $2.0 million by the year end for these two categories. Expenditures General Fund Expenditures The General Fund expenditures are summarized in the chart below. City wide General Fund expenditures are at 41.40% of budget. Included as part of Attachment 2 is the December 31, 2001 General Fund Expenditure Summary. The decrease in actual expenditures from last year is a result of outstanding Police service billings. The year-end estimate for 01 /02 reflects expenditures to be approximately at the current budget. GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Description Budget Amount Expended % Expended Personnel 1 4,955,774 $2,232,284 45.04% Service/Supply ( 12,069,0021 4,326,5551 35.85% Capital Outlay I 204,0581 83,4641 40.90% Reimbursed Expenditures I (3,987,564)1 (1,592,230)1 39.93% Transfer Out 1,698,014 1,134,345 66.80% TOTALS $14,939,284 $6,184,418 41.40% The Mid -Year Personnel Expenditures are at 45%, and it is projected that year-end expenditures will be approximately 95 % of the budget estimate. These savings are accounted for by vacancies in the organization. Total operating services/supply expenses for the City are at 36%. The primary reason for this reduced amount is due to Citywide reduced expenditures in the first half of the fiscal year and Police service billing delays of $700,000. It is anticipated that the second half (January to June) overall expenditures will be greater and operating expenses will be closer to budgeted levels. 214 064 Developer Impact Fee Program The Developer Impact Fee program revenues collected for the first six months are summarized in the following table: DEVELOPER IMPACT FEE REVENUE SUMMARY 01 /02 Estimated Description Budget 12/31 /01 % Year End Year End YTD Actual Estimate Variance over/(under) Transportation fee $307,100 $375,747 122.35% $529,297 $153,550 Park & Recreation fee 221,500 211,423 95.45% 322,173 110,750 Civic Center fee 323,100 301,419 93.29% 462,969 161,550 Library Development fee 167,900 125,370 74.67% 209,320 83,950 Community Center fee 58,600 56,342 96.15% 85,642 29,300 Street Facility fee 10,500 11,417 108.73% 16,667 5,250 Park Facility fee 3,200 3,173 99.17% 4,773 1,600 Totals $1,091,900 $1,084,892 99.36% $1,630,842 $ 545,950 The chart projects actual revenues to exceed budgeted revenues by 49%. The General Fund request for Mid -Year additional appropriations outlined in Attachment 1 are as follows: City General Fund General Government 0 City Clerk 0 Finance 0 Police 52,200 Community Services 22,875 Building & Safety 95,000 Community Development 73,450 Public Works 342.900 Totals Personnel Actions There are no personnel requests at Mid -Year. 215 GU Redevelopment Agency Tax increment revenue for the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) is received from the County in January and May; therefore, actual tax increment revenues have not been received to date. The earned tax increment equals the 50% benchmark. Provided as part of Attachment 2 is the revenue and expenditure detail for the Redevelopment Agency. The budget amounts have been adjusted to reflect the latest data from the County Auditor/Controllers office. Mid -Year Budget Appropriations REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TAX INCREMENT REVEN11E R11MMARY Estimated 01 /02 I Year End I ( 12/31 /01 I I 12/31 /01 I Year End I Variance Description Budget YTD Actual % Earned Estimate Over/(Under) PA# 1 Debt Service I $16,822,5031 $190,6421 1.13%1 $8,411,2521 $16,822,5031 $0 Low Mod Tax Increment 4,205,626 47,661 1.13% 2,102,813 4,205,626 0 21,028,129 238,303 1.13% 10,514,065 21,028,129 0 TOTAL TAX INCREMENT PA#2 Debt Service I 7,364,4401 85,6561 1.16% I 3,682,2201 7,364,4401 0 Low Mod Tax Increment 1,841,110 21,414 1.16% 920,555 1,841,110 0 9,205,550 107,070 1.16% 4,602,775 9,205,550 0 TOTAL TAX INCREMENT TOTAL 1 $30,233,6791 $345,3731 1.14%1$15,116,8401$30,233,6791 $0 Project Area No. 1 estimated revenues exceed budgeted revenues by approximately $3.0 million and Project Area No. 2 revenues exceed the budget by over $2.0 million. Increases in both project areas' tax valuations are the result of new development within the City which were approximately 20% greater for Project Area No. 1 and 30% greater for Project No. 2 than the previous year. Redevelopment Agency Staff is proposing additional revenues and appropriations in Redevelopment Project Areas No. 1 & 2 based upon the following: • Updated tax increment estimates; • Pass through payments affected by updated tax increment estimates; 21. � The proposed additional revenues and appropriations are as follows: RDA 1 RDA 2 Increase Increase (Decrease) (Decrease) Debt Service Funds Revenues Tax Increment 2,457,195 1,553,825 Expenditures Pass Through Agreements 881,425 1,042,469 Transfers Out - - Subtotal 881,425 1,042,469 Capital Projects Funds Transfers In - - Low/Mod Funds Revenues Tax Increment 614,299 388,456 Total Revenues 3,071,494 1,942,281 Less Total Appropriations 881,425 1,042,469 Net Changes 2,190,069 899,812 Transfer In - - Transfer Out - - These proposed adjustments will result in an estimated increase in revenues of almost $3.1 million in Project Area No. 1 and an increase in revenues of approximately $1.95 million in Project Area No. 2. Expenditures are estimated to increase $881,425 in Project Area No. 1 and increase $1,042,469 in Project Area No. 2. Investment Earnings At this time, the Investment Pool's high degree of liquidity is due to our strategy to invest in permitted investments on the shorter end of the yield curve, so as to not lock up at historically low yields. Staff anticipates that yields will trend higher as the economy stabilizes, at which point we can re-evaluate an investment strategy of investing in longer -term maturity investments. Investment earnings for the final six months of the fiscal year will continue to fall as higher yielding investments mature and are replaced by lower yielding 21'7 1. 1 *� 7 investments. Attachment 3 is a graph of the yield for the six month Treasury bonds for the last two years. Staff has analyzed the pooled interest earning accounts for each fund and is recommending the following decreases in the Budget as follows: FUND BUDGET PROPOSED BUDGET General Fund $674,900 $624,900 Library 31,600 20,000 RDA - PA 1 Low -Mod 200,000 50,000 t- Decrease in Investment Earnings $ 211,600 Summary As identified in the report, it is projected that the City's General Fund revenues will exceed expenditures by approximately $1 13,000 after Mid -Year appropriations. This excess is due in large part to increased building activities, and anticipated Sales tax collections in the first 6 months of the year, and conservative spending. It is recommended that any anticipated excess of revenues over expenditures be utilized to increase the City's emergency and cash flow reserves. This action will be consistent with the Fiscal Management Strategy. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: Alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve an increase in Estimated Revenues for Project Areas No. 1 and 2 totaling $5,013,775; approve the New Appropriations as outlined in Attachment No. 1 of this report totaling $586,425 from the General Fund, and $1,923,894 in RDA Project Areas No. 1 and 2, approve the revised reduction in Investment Earnings totaling $21 1,600 and receive and file the Mid -Year Budget Report; or 2. Approve, with changes, the proposed revenue, expenditures and transfers recommended and receive and file the Mid -Year Budget Report; or 3. Do not approve the proposed revenue, expenditures and transfers recommended• and do not receive and file the Mid -Year Budget Report; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. 213 6-ii s Respectfully submitted, Approved for submission by: �� Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Mid -year budget review worksheet 2. General Fund Revenues/Expenditures Detail 210 ATTACHMENT 1 O -- N O O m Ul N N o a O m m N m N 0 0 O 0 N � � f�A m N N cr c a r° Z N x x x x (gyp m m o m m m c aac.a CD 0 a co v m 0 0 CD 0 FFFF m n 0 0 n CD m m m m W V! V) (A W m m m m m c c c 9 _ _ = O (u co cu 1 1 1 m 0 (�D n S •� �_ O O (D V! co Of c O 0000 W W W W O O O O W W N O (JI V (O O O O (11 000(Op N O O N O O O C) p O 0 0 0 m o 0 0 0 < < < c (D m m 0. O O O (D -, .0 am am a) 3 3 3 a 0000 ? S S n p o 0 0 7 (n N (p/�l (OCD /�7 a O 0 -0 C C C O y N (c 7 00> N CD m m 00 0 V1 V1 c a m (D (D m O m fcnD o m m m m m m � a.7 I -� O A W N -+ _ p' Z r O (CD -pw I � � N I 1 1 I 7 c 3 O c1 r m o CDC c o o c -CID� � O 3 z a 3 3 x < �. c 0 o 0 > :3 3 3 I< ` ((DD d. 0 N m W y S r (Q < N M < 2 7 m �CC N O 7 rr N K � O n W O m m G O 3 C ( 3 N W .. �? I 1-► m (D x lA' ;amm -� co ;u m ;a mmm ;a m m m m ;um m m m (D x x <aa r (D < x x x ama m < x a (p a < a a a <'a a a a CD m m m g m (D (D (D m m m (D m (D m m m (D m CD m :3 7 7 c C. C. m 0 c >>> C_ 0. C. > c m C. 7 c C_ 7 C. C_ 7 C. = m 7 7 7 c C. C_ C. C. � c c (D ��I c c c c �T1 c c c c c c c c m '1 1 1 1 ��n �1 '1 n 1 1 1 '� �— '1 . 1 . 1 (D c m c m m m c m c m m m m c m m m a a C. n. C. co co co co W m v m m m CD 0 m m 0 s m m OF 0 F F F O F F F F 0 F s CD CDm m m m m m m m m m m m (D m m o m m m m D (D D) O 01 W (n m m W Al m n) m 0 (h 0 m n) U) m n) (n ID 0 m 0) O to c1 w O w m (n (A 0 V! v W W W CD m m W CD o W m m m m W m m G) W m m m m m W m m m m m W m 0 m o co s -o m �1 -1 0 0 0 cc m CD 0 hi CD coa 0 3'� m a :3 0 C 3 cCD 3(U) 3o o CD m 0 m W_ C co _� n U) O O 1 O 0 m � n -. m0 O 1 p '� C C. .. O O 7 �0c)h� O O m< ID (D O (D m 7 m 7 m = D� 3 (0 �. m CD .0. c T. 7 0 W Z y fC (D N .0+ m m- 3 S (D W a 7 0 (0D 2 W CD W 7C W (A U) CD (n CQ m (n G1 (D W 2a W a 0 m CD W �. W 0. 0 O 0 0 to 3 m (D x 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D 1 1 A Ja 0 C n a61 1 1 1 w w W 1 A 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 1 1 1 A A Ja �. 0 O0 N �. cn Ln Ln A A A O N (.n (A O N O N (.n Ln (n Ln N N N I 1 00 rn UI O Z m p- (n a) CA 0) W a) 0) V 1 1 Ch a)rn rn Z Ln Ln 1 1 O O O O (JI (n1 — O (!I Ln W A V N O w O O O O (A co (O (a O O O I 1 1 (A UI (JI I O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 1 1 I (11 Ln (n O 00 O O D (ii G W A O A V N ? O O is O O O O O O O O w (!I Ln O A V O O D W W W W O (O N (11 N (JI O O (JI .. N UI co A w Al O O A A A(n O 3 G O 000 O O O O N O OD O O OD w N W O O 3 UI O O O c v V O 000 O O O V O O O O O V (11 (O O O O O O O O O O O c p ; O O O O O O O O O O O O � m CD me 555 v CD m 5 F MC °� W mmCD ` y ° m < m m m=m =- o m 0 mmm CA �• a w a a w m(o v W o X C. m m (WD C. C. C. 0 0 < w m O m C. m O m m m m W C. C. m 0 ^'. m mCL m O C- m $ :' F m m 0 0 3 3 9 W � 3 3 3 m m 0 c a c =m3 vvm a vai a (D a aaaa m C. m ° m a ao 0 0 a -. -. -. O O O (n a O m O. n o o 0 C. < C. �a - - - W W W D O .0.. C. 0 Uf Vl II1 CD CD m m m m j' N n N (n Z 7 m O ? 0 (D a 0 O 3 0p 0 �' m m < 3 2 (p m m m W n Vl /� ' a ; vmi w o' a 1 1 n CD 0 CD (p o 0 0 Vl 7 X N W n O 0 7 M c N Val N (D 7 m N N 0 m .E m..m. m-. @ S C m m (D (D C. 3 0 *< 0 m 3 3 o m < o ., o� mmo � y m m m M 0 U_ (C' S. < < < Q CD — --% mN W m CD 7 7 7 o a' `< Al 7 m a' c c m y y y y CD (CD m N umi C_ W m 0 Q- c m Uaf CD W m (C 7 w. o i ATTACHMENT 2 CITY OF LA QUINTA GENERAL FUND REVENUES DETAIL TAXES: Property Tax No Low Properly Tax Distribution Document Transfer Tax Sales Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Franchise Tax TOTAL TAXES LICENSE & PERMITS: Business License Animal License Building Permits Plumbing Permits Electrical Permits Mechanical Permits Misc. Permits TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS FEES: Sale of Maps & Publications Community Services Fees Bldg & Safety Fees Community Development Fees Public Works Fees TOTAL FEES INTERGOVERNMENTAL Motor Vehicle In -Lieu Motor Vehicle Code Fines Parking Violations Misc. Fines AB939 State of California Grant CSA152 Assessment TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL INTEREST MISCELLANEOUS Miscellaneous Revenue Cash Over/(Short) TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFER IN TOTAL GENERAL FUND 07/01/2001-12/31/2001 06/30/02 01/02 ESTIMATED Adjusted Y.E. Y.E. VARIANCE Received Accrued Totals ESTIMATE BUDGET OVER/(UNDER) $235,799.02 $235,799.02 $520,600.00 $520,600.00 $0.00 236,791.25 236,791.25 450,600.00 450,600.00 0.00 182,257.54 182,257.54 380,000.00 380,000.00 0.00 1,488,821.66 272,300.00 1,761,121.66 3,500,000.00 3,217,500.00 282,500.00 885,546.33 275,000.00 1,160,546.33 3,350,000.00 3,595,000.00 (245,000.00) 116,522.51 116,522.51 537,500.00 537,500.00 0.00 3,145,738.31 547,300.00 3,693,038.31 8,738,700.00 8,701,200.00 37,500.00 73,695.20 73,695.20 152,000.00 152,000.00 0.00 5,450.75 5,450.75 12,400.00 12,400.00 0.00 618,271.50 618,271.50 824,522.00 412,500.00 412,022.00 100,719.33 100,719.33 145,419.00 89,400.00 56,019.00 105,415.84 105,415.84 139,416.00 68,000.00 71,416.00 58,220.55 58,220.55 76,721.00 37,000.00 39,721.00 22,839.25 22,839.25 48,300.00 48,300.00 0.00 984,612.42 0.00 984,612.42 1,398,778.00 819,600.00 579,178.00 385.48 385.48 1,500.00 2,150.00 (650.00) 66,738.64 66,738.64 157,825.00 157,825.00 0.00 415,104.65 415,104.65 594,080.00 357,950.00 236.130.00 101,884.16 101,884.16 222,000.00 222,000.00 0.00 320,144.24 320,144.24 554,419.00 468,550.00 85,869.00 904,257.17 0.00 904,257.17 1,529,824.00 1,208,475.00 321,349.00 588,858.71 110,900.00 699,758.71 1,257,600.00 1,257,600.00 0.00 15,920.30 15,920.30 31,000.00 50,300.00 (19,300.00) 59,962.95 59,962.95 72,463.00 25,000.00 47,463.00 4,733.24 4,733.24 7,500.00 5,000.00 2,500.00 84,126.94 84,126.94 159,900.00 159,900.00 0.00 38,105.00 38,105.00 134,105.00 134,105.00 0.00 32,309.17 32,309.17 126,700.00 126,700.00 0.00 824,016.31 110,900.00 934,916.31 1,789,268.00 1,758,605.00 30,663.00 932,399.82 932,399.82 1,535,600.00 1,535,600.00 0.00 6,843.41 6,843.41 15,000.00 27,700.00 (12,700.00) (8.15) (8.15) 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,835.26 0.00 6,835.26 15,000.00 27,700.00 (12,700.00) 0.00 0.00 281,749.75 281,749.75 0.00 $6 797,859 1658,200 $7,456,059 $15,288,920 114,332 930 $955 990 2 2. I Oil 07/01 /2001 -12/31 /2001 06/30/02 01 /02 01 /02 06/30/02 ESTIMATED GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Adjusted Y.E. Mid Yr Proposed Y.E. VARIANCE BY DEPARTMENT Expenditures Accrued Totals ESTIMATE BUDGET Requests BUDGET UNDER(OVER) GENERAL GOVERNMENT: LEGISLATIVE $231,896 $35,000 $266,896 $585,800 $585,800 $585,800 $0 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 240,482.02 240,482.02 613,200 613,200 613,200 0 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 358,354.98 358,354.98 910,000 910,000 910,000 0 PERSONNEL/RISK MGT 396,304.56 396,304.56 572,872 572,872 572,872 0 1,227,037.71 35,000.00 1,262,037.71 2,681,872.00 2,681,872.00 0.00 2,681,872.00 0.00 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE: FISCAL SERVICES 262,592.36 262,592.36 542,515 542,515 542,515 0 CENTRAL SERVICES 121,271.41 121,271.41 311,205 311,205 311,205 0 383,863.77 0.00 383,863.77 853,720.00 853,720.00 0.00 853,720.00 0.00 TOTAL FINANCE 164,557.13 164,557.13 373,650 373,650 373,650.00 0 CITY CLERK COMMUNITY SERVICES SENIOR CENTER 108,530.80 108,530.80 265,475 257,600 7,875 265,475 0 PARKS & RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 235,100.09 235,100.09 812,058 797,058 15,000 812,058 0 PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAMS 25,553.39 25,553.39 90,800 90,800 90,800 0 369,184.28 0.00 369,184.28 1,168,333.00 1,145,458.00 22,875.00 1,168,333.00 0.00 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 1,073,455,78 700,000.00 1,773,455.78 4,189,386 4,137,186 52,200 4,189,386 0 POLICE BUILDING & SAFETY: BUILDING & SAFETY -ADMIN 87,310.11 87,310.11 179,700 179,700 179,700 0 CODE COMPLIANCE 193,687.40 193,687.40 478,484 478,484 478,484 0 ANIMAL CONTROL 70,276.66 70,276.66 166,043 166,043 166,043 0 BUILDING 319,564.07 20,000.00 339,564.07 713,488 618,488 95,000 713,488 0 EMERGENCY SERVICES 67,902.55 67,902.55 96,524 96,524 96,524 0 FIRE 6,745.75 6,745.75 67,278 67,278 67,278 0 CIVIC CENTER BUILDING -OPERATIONS 747,583.76 747,583.76 1,088,751 1,088,751 1,088,751 0 1,493,070.30 20,000.00 1,513,070.30 2,790,268.00 2,695,268.00 95,000.00 2,790,268.00 0.00 TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - ADMIN 166,623.72 166,623.72 472,450 469,000 3,450 472,450 0 CURRENT PLANNING 252,004.62 252,004.62 759,807 689,807 70,000 759,807 0 418,628.34 0.00 418,628.34 1,232,257.00 1,158,807.00 73,450.00 1,232,257.00 0.00 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC WORKS: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 130,323.77 130,323.77 286,100 252,200 33,900 286,100 0 DEVELOPMENT & TRAFFIC 415,014.63 415,014.63 893,668 634,668 309,000 943,668 50,000 MAI NT/OPERATIONS - STREETS 285,911.85 285,911.85 1,448,886 1,548,886 1,548,886 100,000 MAINT/OPERATIONS- LTG/LANDSCAPING 589,196.26 589,196.26 1,259,699 1,359,699 1,359,699 100,000 CAPITAL PROJECTS 92,059,58 92,059.58 287,420 387,420 387,420 100,000 1,512,506.09 0.00 1,512,506.09 4,175,773.00 4,182,873.00 342,900.00 4,525,773.00 350,000.00 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 1,134,344.80 1,134,344.80 1,698,014 1,698,014 1,698,014 0 TRANSFERS OUT GENERAL FUND REIMBURSEMENTS (1,592,230.26) (1,592,230.26) (3,987,564) (3,987,564) (3,987,564) 0 NET GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $6 184 418 $755 000 $6 939 418 $15 175 709 $14 939 284 $586 425 $15 525 709 $350 000 G�3 CITY OF LA QUINTA REVENUES - ALL FUNDS 07/01/2001-12/31/2001 FUNDS BUDGET RECEIVED RECEIVED General $14,382,929.75 $6,797,859.29 47.3% Library 95,000.00 87,913.18 92.5% Gas Tax Revenue 435,318.27 237,674.59 54.6% Cmaq/lstea 287,423.00 0.00 0.0% Federal Assistance 543,825.00 0.00 0.0% Assessment District 2000-1 0.00 10,712.62 0.0% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 102,391.75 1,072.23 1.0% Local Law Enforcement 27,004.00 27,169.77 100.6% Lighting & Landscaping 781,400.00 20,352.45 2.6% Quimby 16,500.00 137,129.00 831.1 % Infrastructure 11,000.00 791759.50 725.1 % Village Parking 100.00 0.00 0.0% South Coast Air Quality 24,481.00 15,685.04 64.1 % LQ Public Safety Officer 2,200.00 2,263.39 102.9% Interest Allocation 0.00 (7,123.52) 0.0% Capital Improvement 51,262,351.36 6,391,824.10 12.5% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 699.84 0.0% Urban Forestry 11,000.00 0.00 0.0% Equipment Replacement 363,180.00 351,402.28 96.8% Information Technology 1,000,000.00 1,015,575.40 101.6% Arts In Public Places 132,900.00 74,703.28 56.2% Transportation 307,100.00 375,747.18 122.4% Parks & Recreation 221,500.00 211,423.10 95.5% Civic Center 323,100.00 301,419.41 93.3% Library Development 167,900.00 125,370.42 74.7% Community Center 58,600.00 56,341.54 96.1 % Street Facility 10,500.00 11,417.13 108.7% Park Facility 3,200.00 3,173.35 99.2% La Quinta Financing Authority 688,130.00 491,464.47 71.4% RDA Project Area No. 1 80,489,860.31 58,614,298.72 72.8% RDA Project Area No. 2 11,376,902.64 459,368.44 4.0% Total $163,125,797.08 $75,894,696.20 46.5% 22v 0l4 07/01/2001-12/3112001 CITY OF LA QUINTA GENERAL FUND REVENUES DETAIL TAXES: Property Tax No Low Property Tax Distribution Document Transfer Tax Sales Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Franchise Tax TOTAL TAXES LICENSE & PERMITS: Business License Animal License Building Permits Plumbing Permits Electrical Permits Mechanical Permits Misc. Permits TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS FEES: Sale of Maps & Publications Community Services Fees Bldg & Safety Fees Community Development Fees Public Works Fees TOTAL FEES INTERGOVERNMENTAL Motor Vehicle In -Lieu Motor Vehicle Code Fines Parking Violations Misc. Fines AB939 State of California Grant CSA152 Assessment TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL INTEREST - Pooled INTEREST - Non Pooled MISCELLANEOUS Miscellaneous Revenue Cash Over/(Short) TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFER IN TOTAL GENERAL FUND REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 520,600.00 235,799.02 284,800.98 45.290% 450,600.00 236,791.25 213,808.75 52.550% 380,000.00 182,257.54 197,742.46 47.960% 3,217,500.00 1,488,821.66 1,728,678.34 46.270% 3,595,000.00 885,546.33 2,709,453.67 24.630% 537,500.00 116,522.51 420,977.49 21.680% 8,701,200.00 3,145,738.31 5,555,461.69 36.150% 152,000.00 73,695.20 78,304.80 48.480% 12,400.00 5,450.75 6,949.25 43.960% 412,500.00 618,271.50 (205,771.50) 149.880% 89,400.00 100,719.33 (11,319.33) 112.660% 68,000.00 105,415.84 (37,415.84) 155.020% 37,000.00 58,220.55 (21,220.55) 157.350% 48,300.00 22,839.25 25,460.75 47.290% 819,600.00 984,612.42 (165,012.42) 120.130% 2,150.00 385.48 1,764.52 17.930% 157,825.00 66,738.64 91,086.36 42.290% 357,950.00 415,104.65 (57,154.65) 115.970% 222,000.00 101,884.16 120,115.84 45.890% 468,550.00 320,144.24 148,405.76 68.330% 1,208,475.00 904,257.17 304,217.83 74.830% 1,257,600.00 588,858.71 668,741.29 46.820% 50,300.00 15,920.30 34,379.70 31.650% 25,000.00 59,962.95 (34,962.95) 239.850% 5,000.00 4,733.24 266.76 94.660% 159,900.00 84,126.94 75,773.06 52.610% 134,105.00 38,105.00 96,000.00 28.410% 126,700.00 32,309.17 94,390.83 25.500% 1,758,605.00 824,016.31 934,588.69 46.860% 674,900.00 334,981.71 339,918.29 49.630% 910,700.00 597,418.11 313,281.89 65.600% 27,700.00 6,843.41 20,856.59 24.710% 0.00 (8.15) 8.15 0.000% 27,700.00 6,835.26 20,864.74 24.680% 281,749.75 0.00 281,749.75 0.000% 14,382,929.75 6,797,859.29 71585,070.46 47.260% 2 K t CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL LIBRARY: County of Riverside Interest TOTAL LIBRARY GAS TAX REVENUE: Section 2105 Section 2106 Section 2107 Section 2107.5 Traffic Congestion Relief Interest TOTAL GAS TAX CMAQIISTEA CMAQ/ISTEA Grant Interest TOTAL CMAQ/ISTEA FEDERAL ASSISTANCE REVENUE: CDBG Grant Interest TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1 Interest Assessment Bond Proceeds Prepayments -sewer assessments Transfer in TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SLESF (COPS) REVENUE: SLESF (Cops) Funding Interest TOTAL SLESF (COPS) LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT REVENUE: LLEBG Funding Interest Transfer in TOTAL LLEBG LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING REVENUE: Assessment Developer Interest TOTAL LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING QUIMBY REVENUE: Quimby Fees Interest TOTAL QUIMBY REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 75,000.00 75,000.00 0.00 100.000% 20,000.00 12,913.18 7,086.82 64.570% 95,000.00 87,913.18 7,086.82 92.540% 135,600.00 70,191.05 65,408.95 51.760% 98,200.00 48,212.04 49,987.96 49.100% 175,100.00 92,017.70 83,082.30 52.550% 5,000.00 6,000.00 (1,000.00) 120.000% 13,718.27 13,718.27 0.00 100.000% 7,700.00 7,535.53 164.47 97.860% 435,318.27 237,674.59 197,643.68 54.600% 287,423.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 287,423.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.000% 543,825.00 0.00 543,825.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 543,825.00 0.00 543,825.00 0.000% 10,712.62 (10,712.62) 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 10,712.62 (10,712.62) 0.000% 100,191.75 0.00 100,191.75 0.000% 2,200.00 1,072.23 1,127.77 48.740% 102 391.75 1,072.23 101,319.52 1.050% 26,704.00 26,704.00 0.00 100.000% 300.00 465.77 (165.77) 155.260% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 27,004.00 27,169.77 (165.77) 100.610% 781,400.00 20,352.45 761,047.55 2.600% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 781,400.00 20,352.45 761,047.55 2.600% 126,375.00 (126,375.00) 0.000% 16,500.00 10,754.00 5,746.00 65.180% 16,500.00 137,129.00 (120,629.00) 831.080% CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL REMAINING % (continued) BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED INFRASTRUCTURE REVENUE: Infrastructure Fee 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 11,000.00 79,759.50 (68,759.50) 725.090% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE 11,000.00 79,759.50 (68,759.50) 725.090% VILLAGE PARKING REVENUE: Interest 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.000% TOTAL VILLAGE PARKING 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.000% SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY REVENUE: S.C.A.Q. Contribution 21,881.00 14,510.09 7,370.91 66.310% Interest 2,600.00 1,174.95 1,425.05 45.190% TOTAL SCAQ 24,481.00 15,685.04 8,795.96 64.070% LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER FUND Transfer In 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 100.000% Interest 200.00 263.39 (63.39) 131.700% TOTAL LQ PUBLIC SAFETY 2,200.00 2,263.39 (63.39) 102.880% INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND: Pooled Cash Allocated Interest (7,123.52) 7,123.52 0.000% Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL INTEREST ALLOCATION 0.00 (7,123.52) 7,123.52 0.000% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: CVAG 13,655,958.18 2,035,746.36 11,620,211.82 14.910% CVWD 1,709,906.00 0.00 1,709,906.00 0.000% County of Riverside 0.00 0.00 0.000% State of Ca- Office Emer. Services 0.00 0.00 0.000% JPIA 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 100.000% I I D 0.00 0.00 0.000% DSUSD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% State of California 530,600.00 0.00 530,600.00 0.000% SB300 Funding 19,365.74 0.00 19,365.74 0.000% Surface Transportation 12,000,118.00 0.00 12,000,118.00 0.000% SB821-Bicycle Path Grant 93,175.00 0.00 93,175.00 0.000% APP Contribution 0.00 0.00 0.000% Developer Agreement Funding 182,142.84 59,149.77 122,993.07 32.470% Transfers in From Other Funds 23,046,085.60 4,271,927.97 18,774,157.63 18.540% TOTAL CIP REVENUE 51,262,351.36 6,391,824.10 44,870,527.26 12.470% LQ NORTE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: Prepayment 0.00 0.00 0.000% Bond Proceeds 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 699.84 (699.84) 0.000% TOTAL LQ NORTE CIP 0.00 699.84 (699.84) 0.000% URBAN FORESTRY Grant Revenue 11,000.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL URBAN FORESTRY 11,000.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.000% i) d r' ., i, U CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND: Equipment Charges Capital Contribution Interest Transfers In TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND: Charges for services Capital Contribution Interest Transfers In TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES REVENUE: Arts in Public Places Arts in Public Places Credits Applied Interest TOTAL ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES TRANSPORTATION Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL TRANSPORTATION PARKS & RECREATION Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION CIVIC CENTER Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL CIVIC CENTER LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY CENTER Developer fees Interest TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 304,980.00 304,982.00 (2.00) 100.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 58,200.00 46,420.28 11,779.72 79.760% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 363,180.00 351,402.28 11,777.72 96.760% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 15,575.40 (15,575.40) 0.000% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 100.000% 12000,000.00 1,015,575.40 (15,575.40) 101.560% 111,300.00 60,107.59 51,192.41 54.010% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 21,600.00 14,595.69 7,004.31 67.570% 132,900.00 74 703.28 58,196.72 56.210% 284,000.00 301,953.45 (17,953.45) 106.320% 23,100.00 73,793.73 (50,693.73) 319.450% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 307,100.00 375,747.18 (68,647.18) 122.350% 201,000.00 188,464.00 12,536.00 93.760% 20,500.00 22,959.10 (2,459.10) 112.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 221,500.00 211,423.10 10,076.90 95.450% 284,500.00 274,727.79 9,772.21 96.570% 38,600.00 26,691.62 11,908.38 69.150% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 323,100.00 301,419.41 21,680.59 93.290% 150,000.00 110,885.00 39,115.00 73.920% 17,900.00 14,485.42 3,414.58 80.920% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 167,900.00 125,370.42 42,529.58 74.670% 53,500.00 50,235.00 3,265.00 93.900% 5,100.00 6,106.54 (1,006.54) 119.740% 58 600.00 56 341.54 2,258.46 96.150% 227 w .v J n CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) STREET FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL STREET FACILITY PARK FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL PARK FACILITY REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 9,500.00 10,070.37 (570.37) 106.000% 1,000.00 1,346.76 (346.76) 134.680% 10,500.00 11,417.13 (917.13) 108.730% 3,000.00 2,817.00 183.00 93.900% 200.00 356.35 (156.35) 178.180% 3,200.00 3,173.35 26.65 99.170% Gl9 LA QUINTA FINANCING AUTHORITY REVENUE DETAIL DEBT SERVICE REVENUE: Contractual Services Fees Non Allocated Interest Rental Income Transfer In TOTAL DEBT SERVICE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REVENUE: Pooled Cash Allocated Interest Non Allocated Interest TOTAL CIP REVENUE BUDGET RECEIVED 9,175.00 0.00 380.84 678,955.00 481,682.50 0.00 REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED 9,175.00 0.000% (380.84) 0.000% 197,272.50 70.940% 0.00 0.000% 688,130.00 482,063.34 206,066.66 70.050% 1,865.76 (1,865.76) 0.000% 7,535.37 (7,535.37) 0.000% 0.00 9,401.13 (9,401.13) 0.000% TOTAL FINANCING AUTHORITY 688,130.00 491,464.47 196,665.53 71.420% LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REVENUE SUMMARY PROJECT AREA NO.1: DEBT SERVICE FUND: Tax Increment Allocated Interest Non Allocated Interest Interest Advance Proceeds Transfers In TOTAL DEBT SERVICE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: Pooled Cash Allocated Interest Non Allocated Interest Litigation Settlement Revenue Bond Proceeds Transfers In TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT LOW/MODERATE TAX FUND: Tax Increment Allocated Interest Non Allocated Interest Miscellaneous revenue Non Allocated Interest LQRP-Rent Revenue Home Sales Proceeds Sale of Land Sewer Subsidy Reimbursements Rehabilitation Loan Repayments Transfer In TOTAL LOW/MOD TAX LOW/MODERATE BOND FUND: Allocated Interest Home Sale Proceeds Non Allocated Interest Transfer In TOTAL LOW/MOD BOND REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 16,822,503.45 190,642.11 16,631,861.34 1.130% 42,496.79 (42,496.79) 0.000% 72,600.02 (72,600.02) 0.000% 446,142.00 0.00 446,142.00 0.000% 10,349,589.00 9,743,485.49 606,103.51 94.140% 27,618,234.45 10,049,224.41 17,569,010.04 36.390% 58,353.62 (58,353.62) 0.000% 125,000.00 213,261.67 (88,261.67) 170.610% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 48,000,000.00 48,000,000.00 0.00 100.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 48,125,000.00 48,271,615.29 (146,615.29) 100.300% 41205,625.86 47,660.53 4,157,965.33 1.130% 50,000.00 19,952.73 30,047.27 39.910% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 1.00 (1.00) 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 341,000.00 130,486.29 210,513.71 38.270% 150,000.00 0.00 150,000.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 25,093.33 (25,093.33) 0.000% 26,520.85 (26,520.85) 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 4,746,625.86 249,714.73 4,496,911.13 5.260% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 43,744.29 (43,744.29) 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 43,744.29 (43,744.29) 0.000% 2 0 LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REMAINING % REVENUE SUMMARY BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED PROJECT AREA NO.2: DEBT SERVICE FUND: Tax Increment 7,364,439.71 85,656.34 7,278,783.37 1.160% Allocated Interest 9,648.55 (9,648.55) 0.000% Non Allocated Interest 387.74 (387.74) 0.000% Interest Advance Proceeds 692,211.00 0.00 692,211.00 0.000% Transfer In 338,442.00 209,488.00 128,954.00 61.900% TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 8,395,092.71 305,180.63 8,089,912.08 3.640% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: Allocated Interest 50,852.51 (50,852.51) 0.000% Non Allocated Interest 20,000.00 2,174.03 17,825.97 10.870% Developer Agreement 0.00 0.00 0.000% Transfers In 0.00 0.00 0.000% Proceeds from City Loan 1,100,000.00 0.00 1,100,000.00 0.000% TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 1,120,000.00 53,026.54 1,066,973.46 4.730% LOW/MODERATE TAX FUND: Tax Increment 1,841,109.93 21,414.08 1,819,695.85 1.160% Developer Funding 0.00 0.00 0.000% Allocated Interest 20,700.00 68,062.84 (47,362.84) 328.810% Non Allocated Interest 0.00 0.00 0.000% Sale of Land 0.00 0.00 0.000% Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL LOW/MOD TAX 1,861,809.93 89,476.92 1,772,333.01 4.810% LOW/MODERATE BOND FUND: Allocated Interest 0.00 0.00 0.000% Non Allocated Interest 11,684.35 (11,684.35) 0.000% Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL LOW/MOD BOND 0.00 11,684.35 (11,684.35) 0.000% 2 311. . CITY OF LA QUINTA EXPENDITURES - ALL FUNDS 07/01/2001-12/31/2001 FUNDs BUDGET. EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED REMAINING BUDGET % EXPENDED General $14,939,284.02 $6,184,417.94 $68,262.24 $8,686,603.84 41.4% Library 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Gas Tax 594,378.00 210,799.98 0.00 383,578.02 35.5% Cmaq/Istea 287,423.00 0.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.0% Federal Assistance 166,638.99 0.00 0.00 166,638.99 0.0% Proposed Assessment District 682,553.47 247,542.46 0.00 435,011.01 36.3% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 100,191.75 0.00 0.00 100,191.75 0.0% Local Law Enforcement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Lighting & Landscaping 781,400.00 390,700.02 0.00 390,699.98 50.0% Quimby 317,381.29 100,966.82 0.00 216,414.47 31.8% Infrastructure 2,368,369.00 260,663.97 0.00 2,107,705.03 11.0% Village Parking (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% South Coast Air Quality 0.00 4,836.69 0.00 (4,836.69) 0.0% Lq Public Safety Officer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Interest Allocation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Capital Improvement 51,262,352.00 6,391,824.10 2,000.00 44,868,527.90 12.5% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 59,403.39 0.00 (59,403.39) 0.0% Urban Forestry 11,000.00 0.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.0% Equipment Replacement 380,209.00 80,649.98 11,299.04 288,259.98 21.2% Arts In Public Places 689,515.71 12,555.00 0.00 676,960.71 1.8% Transportation 1,854,850.03 74,555.14 0.00 1,780,294.89 4.0% Parks & Recreation 4,508,263.00 44,289.80 0.00 4,463,973.20 1.0% Civic Center 204,660.00 102,330.00 0.00 102,330.00 50.0% Library Development 623,324.00 7,145.60 0.00 616,178.40 1.1% Community Center 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Street Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Park Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Information Technology 476,372.00 130,893.70 27,771.66 317,706.64 27.5% La Quinta Financing Authority 1,209,498.78 487,920.00 0.00 721,578.78 40.3% RDA Project Area No. 1 49,216,740.46 29,291,392.66 0.00 19,925,347.80 59.5% RDA Project Area No. 2 16,076,522.44 2,977,545.89 6,400.00 13,092,576.55 18.5% Total $146,749,034.09 $47,060,433.14 $115,732.94 $99,572,868.01 32.1 % 4, 3 ,., 07/01 /2001 -12/31 /2001 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT REMAINING % BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED GENERAL GOVERNMENT: LEGISLATIVE 585,800.00 231,896.15 0.00 353,903.85 39.6% CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 613,200.00 240,482.02 483.75 372,234.23 39.2% ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 910,000.00 358,354.98 0.00 551,645.02 39.4% PERSONNEURISK MGT 572,872.00 396,304.56 0.00 176,567.44 69.2% TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 2,681,872.00 1,227,037.71 483.75 1,454,350.54 45.8% FINANCE: FISCAL SERVICES 542,515.00 262,592.36 0.00 279,922.64 48.4% CENTRAL SERVICES 311,205.00 121,271.41 0.00 189,933.59 39.0% TOTAL FINANCE 853,720.00 383,863.77 0.00 469,856.23 45.0% CITY CLERK 373,650.00 164,557.13 209,092.87 44.0% COMMUNITY SERVICES SENIOR CENTER 257,600.00 108,530.80 2,764.87 146,304.33 42.1% PARKS & RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 797,058.00 235,100.09 3,878.00 558,079.91 29.5% PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAMS 90,800.00 25,553.39 0.00 65,246.61 28.1% TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 1,145,458.00 369,184.28 6,642.87 769,630.85 32.2% POLICE 4,137,185.75 1,073,455.78 52,235.62 3,011,494.35 25.9% BUILDING & SAFETY: BUILDING & SAFETY - ADMIN 179,700.00 87,310.11 0.00 92,389.89 48.6% CODE COMPLIANCE 478,484.00 193,687.40 0.00 284,796.60 40.5% ANIMAL CONTROL 166,043.00 70,276.66 0.00 95,766.34 42.3% BUILDING 618,488.00 319,564.07 0.00 298,923.93 51.7% EMERGENCY SERVICES 96,524.00 67,902.55 0.00 28,621.45 70.3% FIRE 67,278.00 6,745.75 0.00 60,532.25 10.0% CIVIC CENTER BUILDING -OPERATIONS 1,088,751.00 747,583.76 0.00 341,167.24 68.7% TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY 2,695,268.00 1,493,070.30 0.00 1,202,197.70 55.4% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - ADMIN 469,000.00 166,623.72 0.00 302,376.28 35.5% CURRENT PLANNING 689,807.00 252,004.62 0.00 437,802.38 36.5% TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,158,807.00 418,628.34 0.00 740,178.66 36.1% PUBLIC WORKS: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 252,200.00 130,323.77 1,000.00 120,876.23 51.7% DEVELOPMENT & TRAFFIC 634,668.00 415,014.63 7,900.00 211,753.37 65.4% MAINT/OPERATIONS - STREETS 1,548,886.00 285,911.85 0.00 1,262,974.15 18.5% MAINT/OPERATIONS - LTG/LANDSCAPING 1,359,699.00 589,196.26 0.00 770,502.74 43.3% CAPITAL PROJECTS 387,420.00 92,059.58 0.00 295,360.42 23.8% TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 4,182,873.00 1,512,506.09 8,900.00 2,661,466.91 36.2% TRANSFERS OUT 1,698,014.27 1,134,344.80 0.00 563,669.47 66.8% GENERAL FUND REIMBURSEMENTS (3,987,564.00) (1,592,230.26) 0.00 (2,395,333.74) 39.9% NET GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 14,939 284.02 6,184,417.94 68 262.24 8,686,603.84 41.4% 2♦,n CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2001-12/31/2001 OTHER CITY FUNDS REMAINING % EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED LIBRARY FUND: PROJECT EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% GAS TAX REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 421,600.00 210,799.98 0.00 210,800.02 50.0% TRANSFER OUT 172,778.00 0.00 0.00 172,778.00 0.0% REIMBURSE GE TOTAL GAS TAX 594 378.00 210 799.98 0.00 383,578.02 35.5% QUIMBY FUND: TRANSFER OUT 317,381.29 100,966.82 0.00 216,414:47 31.8% FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND: TRANSFER OUT 166,638.99 0.00 0.00 166 638.99 0.0% SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 4,836.69 0.00 (4,836.69) 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 0.00 4,836.69 0.00 (4,836.69) 0.0% CMAQ/ISTEA TRANSFER OUT 287,423.00 0.00 0.00 287,423:00 0.0% VILLAGE Parking TRANSFER OUT (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRIBUTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% LLEBG FUND TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% SLESF (COPS) TRANSFER OUT 100 191.75 0.00 0.00 100 191.75 0.0% LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DIST: REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 781,400.00 390,700.02 0.00 390,699.98 50.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL LTG/LANDSCAPING FUND 781,400.00 390 700.02 0.00 390,699.98 50.0% INFRASTRUCTURE FUND CONSTRUCTION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 2,368,369.00 260,663.97 0.00 2,107,705.03 11.0% TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE 2,368,369.00 260 663.97 0.00 2,107 705.03 11.0% ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1 COSTS OF ISSUANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER TO AGENCY FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 682,553.47 247,542.46 0.00 435,011.01 36.3% TOTAL AD 2000-1 682 553.47 247,542.46 0.00 435 011.01 36.3% CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2001-12/31/2001 OTHER CITY FUNDS REMAINING % EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 1,854,850.03 74,555.14 0.00 1,780,294.89 4.0% TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 1,854,850.03 74 555.14 0.00 1,780,294.89 4 0% PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 4,508,263.00 44,289.80 0.00 4,463,973.20 1.0% TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 4,508,263.00 44,289.80 0.00 4,463 973.20 1.0% CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 204,660.00 102,330.00 0.00 102,330.00 50.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL CIVIC CENTER 204,660.00 102,330.00 0.00 102,330.00 50.0% LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 623,324.00 7,145.60 0.00 616,178.40 1.1% TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 623 324.00 7,145.60 0.00 616 178.40 1.1 % COMMUNITY CENTER PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% STREET FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL STREET FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% PARK FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL PARK FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 50,079,648.62 6,202,021.84 2,000.00 43,875,626.78 12.4% PROJECT REIMBURSEMENTS TO GEN FUND 1,182,703.38 189,802.26 0.00 992,901.12 16.0% TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 51 262 352.00 6,391,824.10 2,000.00 44 868 527.90 12.5% ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND MAINTENANCE EXPENSES-APP 2,000.00 1,425.00 0.00 575.00 71.3% OPERATING EXPENSES-APP 5,000.00 (785.00) 0.00 5,785.00 -15.7% ART PURCHASES 265,340.00 4,000.00 0.00 261,340.00 1.5% TRANSFER OUT 417,175.71 7,915.00 0.00 409,260.71 1.9% TOTAL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES 689,515.71 12,555.00 0.00 676,960.71 1.8% LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND PROJECT EXPENSES 0.00 4,176.20 0.00 (4,176.20) 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 59,403.39 0.00 (59,403.39) 0.0% TOTAL LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND 0.00 63 579.59 0.00 (63 579.59) 0.0% URBAN FORESTRY GRANT TRANSFER OUT 11 000.00 0.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.0% VILLAGE PARKING TRANSFER OUT (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.KL 0.0% INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 476 372.00 130 893.70 27 771.66 317 706.64 27.5% EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 380 209.00 80 649.98 11 299.04 288 259.98 21.2% LA QUINTA FINANCING AUTHORITY 07/01/2001-12/31/2001 REMAINING % EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES SERVICES 9,589.00 6,237.50 0.00 3,351.50 65.0% BOND PRINCIPAL 275,000.00 275,000.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% BOND INTEREST 407,178.00 206,682.50 0.00 200,495.50 50.8% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 691,767.00 487,920.00 0.00 203,847.00 70.5% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENDITURES TRANSFER OUT 517,731.78 0.00 0.00 517,731.78 0.0% TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 517,731.78 0.00 0.00 517,731.78 0.0% TOTAL FINANCING AUTHORITY 1,209,498.78 487,920.00 0.00 721,578.78 40.34% LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY EXPENDITURE SUMMARY PROJECT AREA NO, 1: DEBT SERVICE FUND: SERVICES BOND PRINCIPAL BOND INTEREST INTEREST CITY ADVANCE INTEREST - ERAF LOAN PASS THROUGH PAYMENTS TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL DEBT SERVICE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: PERSONNEL SERVICES LAND ACQUISITION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL - BUILDING BOND ISSUANCE COSTS REIMBURSEMENT TO GEN FUND TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT LOW/MODERATE TAX FUND: PERSONNEL SERVICES ASSESSMENT SUBSIDY PROGRAM UNDERGROUND UTILITY SUBSIDY BUILDING HORIZONS LQ RENTAL PROGRAM LQ HOUSING PROGRAM LQ REHABILITATION APARTMENT REHABILITATION REIMBURSEMENT TO GEN FUND TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL LOW/MOD TAX LOW/MODERATE BOND FUND PERSONNEL SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT TO GEN FUND HOUSING PROJECTS TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL LOW/MOD BOND 07/01/2001-12/31/2001 REMAINING % BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED 249,834.00 7,427.50 0.00 242,406.50 3.0% 1,486,277.00 1,486,277.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% 4, 623, 726.00 1, 481, 202.82 0.00 3,142, 523.18 32.0 % 446,142.00 223,071.00 0.00 223,071.00 50.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 16,759,956.00 9,497,715.62 0.00 7,262,240.38 56.7% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 23,565,935.00 12,695,693.94 0.00 10,870,241.06 53.9% 10,050.00 3,591.75 0.00 6,458.25 35.7% 191,079.00 54,932.71 0.00 136,146.29 28.7% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 339,558.00 32,600.00 0.00 306,958.00 9.6% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 1,943,714.00 1,939,725.25 0.00 3,988.75 99.8% 1,085,485.00 542,740.74 0.00 542,744.26 50.0% 13,285,459.00 10,672,071.33 0.00 2,613,387.67 80.3% 16 855 345.00 13 245 661.78 0.00 3,609,683.22 78.6% 10,050.00 3,591.75 0.00 6,458.25 35.7% 239,315.00 58,718.41 180,596.59 24.5% 445,000.00 15,023.90 0.00 429,976.10 3.4% 71,000.00 0.00 0.00 71,000.00 0.0% 210,000.00 172,700.00 0.00 37,300.00 82.2% 829,000.00 154,841.39 0.00 674,158.61 18.7% 3,540,000.00 1,491,963.00 0.00 2,048,037.00 42.1% 200,000.00 11,525.50 0.00 188,474.50 5.8% 700.000.00 73,589.42 0.00 626,410.58 10.5% 206,366.00 103,182.96 0.00 103,183.04 50.0% 1, 737, 006.00 1,130, 902.61 0.00 606,103.39 65.1 % 8,187,737.00 3,216,038.94 0.00 4,971,698.06 39.3% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 607,723.46 133,998.00 0.00 473,725.46 22.0% 607,723.46 133 998.00 0.00 473 725.46 22.0% ("a r �j �.. LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 07/01/2001-12/31/2001 REMAINING % EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED PROJECT AREA NO. 2: DEBT SERVICE FUND: SERVICES 94,120.00 3,075.00 0.00 91,045.00 3.3% BOND PRINCIPAL 163,723.00 246,686.75 0.00 (82,963.75) 150.7% BOND INTEREST 593,968.00 214,557.68 0.00 379,410.32 36.1 % INTEREST CITY ADVANCE 692,211.00 346,105.50 0.00 346,105.50 50.0% INTEREST - ERAF LOAN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% PASS THROUGH PAYMENTS 6,257,253.00 529,985.07 0.00 5,727,267.93 8.5% TRANSFERS OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 7,801,275.00 1,340,410.00 0.00 6,460,865.00 17.2% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: PERSONNEL 5,950.00 2,173.57 0.00 3,776.43 36.5% SERVICES 119,164.00 69,079.27 0.00 50,084.73 58.0% ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY 85,000.00 0.00 0.00 85,000.00 0.0% REIMBURSEMENT TO GEN FUND 34,092.00 17,045.34 0.00 17,046.66 50.0% TRANSFERS OUT 1,353,442.00 1,144,525.86 0.00 208,916.14 84.6% TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 1,597,648.00 1,232,824.04 0.00 364,823.96 77.2% LOW/MODERATE TAX FUND: PERSONNEL 5,950.00 2,173.57 0.00 3,776.43 36.5% SERVICES 159,959.00 51,129.26 0.00 108,829.74 32.0% SEWER SUBSIDIES 85,000.00 0.00 0.00 85,000.00 0.0% LQ RENTAL PROGRAM 1,395,000.00 47,125.00 6,400.00 1,341,475.00 3.4% LOW MOD HOUSING PROJECTS 650,000.00 275.00 0.00 649,725.00 0.0% REIMBURSEMENT TO GEN FUND 71,258.00 35,628.96 0.00 35,629.04 50.0% TRANSFERS OUT 1,787,701.44 267,980.06 0.00 1,519,721.38 15.0% TOTAL LOW/MOD TAX 4,154,868.44 404 311.85 6,400.00 3,744,156.59 9.7% LOW/MODERATE BOND FUND PERSONNEL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% REIMBURSEMENT TO GEN FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFERS OUT 2,522,731.00 0.00 0.00 2,522,731.00 0.0% TOTAL LOW/MOD BOND 2,522,731.00 0.00 0.00 2,522,731.00 0.0% .9 tl - 4' 0? i i HI:) i ; 45 SALOMON S.W TH BARNEY ATTACHMENT 3 TEL,945 717 541;9 AP 001/991 ,SMrm--.� tadcwiN gctnlctl Vice ilrlltld�rlt Irv(5m7 tf i,lit;nlcnal Foler.. Haar' �, 1;1Q N9wQ�'l Center Qsrvi, A 1R ',lX� 14,1 :7fl'SiYCt Gn.�2efIC r g�9.7t i 5M5 r�x N17U Index C3f'C� - CMAT05 M Index GPO CI�iT06M NY ?.3,�AN02 17= 00 1.78 .�---X CfWW- Mid tin e Range/ /0 - Period moving Wig Averages [� � �� er (;hart: Mid PA Lin _ I , 1 • , , ; ; ' 1 , • 1 1 • C eie/tt d , G� 1 MloI tlammIm I , , , -•, I 1 I 1 1 1�--•--'- Y MA to • • 1 a SOP I 1 • ' ' 1 . 1 1 � 1 I • 1 � ' I 1 ' ' ' / I 1 ' 1 � / • 1 1 1 1 1 ' ( -r- -i• 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 i � 1 • ' 1 1 1 1 1 , I • 1 ' 1 , 1 1 1 - - ' � - 1 � , 1 1 1 1 ► 1 1 , I I i 1 1 1 ' ' ' t I ( . 1 1 I , , I 1 1 1 1 1 1 • , , , , 1 I p'st!"Mig 51 t 97?7 8690 tgrazil 5".i!! 30a8 450� 6� Z1� SOE011 Up5.41 ?0t1 318 z000 Copy►-igilt 20�12 912oablpr9 Mor,q Kanq 85Z 237T 6000 JotOotn t1 3 9201 4900 si3l,gdper �- 1-2 2�t-Jun 02 13'S2 20 fhi flaWrial, i$ fumished on the understvnding that Saio,� -(' Silvih Gamey is nut undertaking to fturiage rmney ar act as a fid,iciary with rasoect to Your account or any of your managed or fiducisry accouPtz aril that our services do not Wve as a pru*viry bans for any investtWt drtisfon nude wits+ respect :o su.h accounts. ?his materiel pro►ides infolmafnn andfor ahsr- nadves we beiirve to be vppropriato for ccnsideratio-1. The decison whether or not to adopt anv strategy or engage in sn,y ,r>fr:Sal,tion is not otir tesprinaibll1w, ►'Iitha�;3M the intemItlo+l In this report has Dter Uttau,a believes to be reliable, we sourt:es wt�ch Salomon Smith 6a�y ao not 9uacantee its accvra-Y a"d n0 ��i+�t�t�ro�n�r�ad nethrs rtl�Sttg nr condensed. All opi�ons Epatt con:titvte our Ndgmertt as or L'us da:e ar�d �.re ;�tr;ect to change without notice. This report is for information Purl osas Cniy and z not intended as en otter or solicitation ;pith WPO t to rho purchase or salt' Of any sr UPW 31 GJ� T 0 4t!t 4 .�f" aul�cfw AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 5, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Discussion of Design Concepts for PUBLIC HEARING: the City's Third Fire Station RECOMMENDATION: Provide staff with direction regarding the provided design options for the City's third fire station. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None with this action. Costs associated with the construction of the station including land acquisition, off site improvements and a fire engine are estimated at $2.6 million. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: On December 4, 2001, the City Council awarded a contract to WLC Architects for the design of the City's third fire station. Provided as Attachments 1 and 2 are elevations of two distinct conceptual designs. The elevations depicted in Attachment 3 are identical to those in Attachment 2 with the exception of color and certain exterior materials. All three elevations can accommodate the floor plan which has been provided as Attachment 4. The proposed floor plan has been developed in conjunction with CDF staff in an effort to maximize function and efficiency. Provided as Attachment 5 is a site plan for the project. The provided elevations do not depict the existing well site. It has not yet been determined if it is preferable to lower the well site, elevate the station building pad, or possibly provide a combination of both in order to minimize the visual impact of the well site on the project. Regardless of the solution, it is the intent of the design team to incorporate the well site into the overall project and minimize its impact by the use of wall and landscape treatments in addition to any necessary well equipment elevation changes. 24Co In an effort to expedite the project as much as possible, the following schedule has been developed for the schematic design phase of the station: February 5, 2002 City Council Study Session for Station Concepts February 13, 2002 Architecture and Landscape Review Committee approval February 21, 2002 Historic Preservation Committee approval February 26, 2002 Planning Commission Approval March 19, 2002 Final City Council approval Construction is anticipated to begin in July of 2002 and completion of the station is projected for May 2003. WLC and CDF staff will be present at the Study Session to answer any questions the City Council may have. Respectfully submitted, Tom Hartung, Director of Building & Safety Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Exterior elevation 1 2. Exterior elevation 2 3. Exterior elevation 2 A 4. Proposed floor plan 5. Proposed site plan 2, 4 002 ATTACHMENT - \ -- $ q § $ G -Tiq ? / a p 3 q 2 ^ ? k D 2 \ § / § § r \' \~ / �� A ATTACHMENT 2 = A u.. m - - rn _ j _- -, z 1 ATTACHMENT 4 "0 m 0 oz VA z MEMO REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: /5 CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION MINUTES December 20, 2001 I. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Cultural Arts Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Study Session Room of the La Quinta Civic Center. Chairperson Shamis presided over the meeting. Commissioner Baxley led the Pledge of Allegiance. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioner Baxley Commissioner Denise Diamond Commissioner Else Loudon Commissioner Elaine Reynolds Commissioner Rosita Shamis (Chairperson) STAFF PRESENT: Dodie Horvitz, Community Services Director II. PUBLIC COMMENT III. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA It was moved by Commissioners Reynolds/Loudon to move Business Item C. to before Business Item B for consideration. Unanimous IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes of November 1, 2001 B. Financial Report for October 2001 C. Financial Report for November 2001 It was moved by Commissioners Reynolds/Loudon to approve the Consent Calendar with one item for clarification: staff is to check the amount of interest income posted to the financial report. Unanimous. V. PUBLIC HEARING - None VI. BUSINESS ITEMS A. De Martino Art Piece Modification Update Mr. De Martino gave a review of the modifications being done to the art piece on Hwy. 1 1 1 and Washington Street. He stated that the bronze mountains will be refurbished, the gem is being revised, the cement base is having a stain applied and the entire piece will be re -lit. SACommunity Services\CAComm\CACMIN.12-20-01.wpd 2 4 '7 Mr. De Martino stated that the original gem had no presence in the art piece and did not do what was originally intended. He also stated that the original color of the cement gave. it an institutional look. A richer, darker color of the cement will allow the base to fade into the surroundings. The lighting system will be installed once the gem in placed in the art piece, so to provide the correct amount of light and at the right angles.\ Mr. De Martino stated that the original art piece had a dark blue gem, however, from the time of original design to construction, the art piece went through several owners and revisions. The gem ended up being a clear Lucite. After some discussion, Mr. De Martino stated that he will do another mock up of the gem at the correct size for review before the final material is cut for the gem. The Cultural Arts Commission, at their May 15, 2001 meeting, recommended that an aquamarine colored gem be placed in the art piece. Mr. De Martino stated that green is the only color that is highly susceptible to ultra -violent light. He has contacted all the pigment manufactures he knows of to test their products. The gem will be made of a translucent material that will be colored after the construction of the material. The Commission agreed that gem be constructed of a translucent aquamarine material that has some "life" to it. Commissioner Baxley is not comfortable with the color choices Mr. De Martino has presented for consideration. Mr. De Martino will darken the color of the samples and present it to the Commission for consideration at the January meeting. Commissioner Baxley suggested that additional testing time might be needed to find the right color. Commission Loudon asked Mr. De Martino for his professional opinion regarding the color for the gem. Mr. De Martino suggested that more blue is needed in the pigment to resist the effects of the sun. Mr. De Martino stated that he will mix four samples and provide them for the Commission's review before the January meeting. No action was taken on this item. C. Consideration of "Hands" Artwork Mr. Amit Katz of Le Arsi Gallery presented information on the artist Ilan Averbuch. Mr. Averbuch is an internationally known artist that has an art piece "Hands" available for sale. The art piece is made of cast iron with a slab of concave stone to be filled with water with hand prints carved out of the stone. Commissioner Shamis stated that the piece is dramatic and strong, as well as exciting. However, she pointed out, that the City of La Quinta has not opened to the door to galleries to bring art work for consideration. The City has historically commissioned art pieces for the Art in Public Places program. Mr. Katz stated that he lives in La Quinta and would like to see this artist's work displayed in "his" city. Commissioner Baxley asked if a site has been considered by Mr. Katz for this piece., SACommunity Services\CAComm\CACM1N. 12-20-0 l.wpd w Commissioner Baxley stated that selecting an art piece without a specific site would be premature. Mr. Katz stated that the Community Park would be a good site for the art piece. Commissioner Reynolds stated that the City has a Temporary Art program and could this piece be displayed as temporary art? Mr. Katz stated that the art piece is in New York and would have to be shipped back for display. He was not sure the artist would pay the shipping costs. Commissioner Loudon stated that the piece is beautiful. Commissioner Diamond stated that the Commission is an advisory body to the City Council and mandated to represent the community's interest in all forms of art. Commissioner Shamis asked as to the availability of funds and prior commitments. Staff responded that there is $152,596 in the APP account, as of November 30. The future projects that may be considered for the APP funds may include additional bridge railings for the City's bridges at Eisenhower, Jefferson and Washington Street. Commissioner Diamond stated that she felt that there was no opportunity to prioritize the purchase of art pieces. Staff reported that the prior APP Commission has recommended to the City Council that artistic bridge railings be included on all City bridges. The future bridge railings are based on past Commission recommendations. Commissioner Reynolds stated that she is favor of the artistic bridge railings for all the City's bridges. Commissioner Baxley asked if the Commission was interested in purchasing the art piece being presented this evening. Commissioner Shamis recommended that the artist be thanked for the presentation, and perhaps the piece can be considered in the future, when all the prior projects have been completed and the funds are available. Commissioner Diamond asked at the City Council be made aware of the offer by an internationally known artist wishing to display his work in the City, specifically in the Community Park. No action was taken on this item. B. 20' Anniversary Celebration Musical Entertainment Commissioner Loudon gave an overview of the 20' Anniversary Committee's recommendation that local high school entertainment be used at the Grand Finale for the 20" Anniversary Celebration. Commissioner Shamis stated that she thinks it's a wonderful idea to use local talent and thanked Commissioner Loudon for all of her hard work. For the remaining 20th Anniversary Celebration meetings, both Commissioners Loudon and Shamis will attend. Commissioner Loudon stated that Principal Bugg from the High School will coordinate the entertainment events. Commissioner Diamond suggested that the 201h Anniversary SACommunity Services\CAComm\CACMIN. 12-20-0 l.wpd �4f' f' Celebration Committee get commitments in writing from all participating organizations so there are no misunderstandings. No action was taken on this item. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIALS VIII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS A. Commissioner Shamis stated that the Symposium was very successful. The goal was to gather public support for the arts and she felt that was accomplished. The program evaluation forms were taken by Colleen McBride, therefore there is no formal review of the program. Ms. McBride also has the original sign in sheet. Commissioner Diamond stated that she would like to see this event happen again next year and would like to see local artists display their work. Commissioner Shamis stated that the Coachella Valley Arts Alliance has expressed interest in hosting the event next year. B. Commissioner Shamis stated that Commissioner Loudon did an outstanding job in coordinating the Alliance's fund raiser dinner/dance. IX. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioners Reynolds/Loudon to adjourn the Cultural Arts Commission meeting. Unanimous. Meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. NEXT MEETING INFORMATION January 10, 2002 7:00 PM La Quinta Civic Center Study Session Room Next agenda: • 20th Anniversary Celebration Musical Groups Plan Submitted by: Y v orvitz, Co mu ' y Services Director SACommunity Services\CAComm\CACMIN.12-20-0l.wpd REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: lV COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MINUTES December 10, 2001 I. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Community Services Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the La Quinta Civic Center. Chairperson St. Johns presided over the meeting. Commissioner Rebich led the Pledge of Allegiance. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioner Deborah Bechard Commissioner Michele Boudreau Commissioner Mike Davis Commissioner Joan Rebich Commissioner Victoria St. Johns (Chairperson) STAFF PRESENT: Dodie Horvitz, Community Services Director II. PUBLIC COMMENT III. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes of November 5, 2001 B. Monthly Department Report for October 2001 It was moved by Commissioners Bechard/Davis to approve the Consent Calendar as submitted. Unanimous. V. PUBLIC HEARING VI. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Youth Workshop Format The Commission discussed the format of the Youth Workshops and that the intention was to have the students be responsible for leading the meetings after the first meeting. The Commissioners that have attended the first three workshops believe that the students are not used to having that much control of the meeting and will need to "grow" into the format. The Commission commented that in the past, Commissioner Nadler -Pedersen, who worked at the High School as a teacher, would motivate and educate the students as to the procedures and therefore the student participation was much higher. The Commission would like to see the High School provide an advisor that will motivate the students to participate in the program. Commissioner Bechard presented information that she had collected at the CPRS Conference regarding starting Youth Commissions. She asked that Commissioners receive a copy of the information so that it can be discussed at the next meeting. It was reported that the next Youth Workshop meeting will be held on January 31, 2002. The Commission will stress that the students must lead the group. Commissioner Boudreau mentioned SACommunity Services\CSComm\minutesCSC\CSCMIN. 12- 10-0 l.wpd that the students need more time to focus on the task of leading the meeting. It was moved It was moved by Rebich/Davis to not change the format of the Youth Workshop. Unanimous B. Facility Use Community Meeting Commissioner Rebich stated that every Commission meeting is open to the public to bring items to the Commission for consideration. She also stated that it is very rare for anyone to attend the meetings. The Commission would like to see strong publicity advertising the meeting in which the Commission will focus on the facility use policies. The Commission also stated that they would like to hold the facility use policy review during their regular meeting date in October. The Commission felt that this would be a good time to review the policies, as the three small parks in the cove will be completed and there may be issues related to their use. The Commission stated that they would not like to see the City's parks locked into a lifetime of restrictions. By reviewing the policies, the City's facilities can be used to their full potential. It was moved It was moved by Bechard/Davis host a facility use review meeting during the regularly scheduled October meeting. Unanimous C. Peace Pole Makers Commissioner Bechard submitted information for consideration at this meeting. This item is being asked to be continued to until the January meeting so that additional information can be provided. No action was taken on this item. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIALS VIII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS A. Community Park Update: Staff provided a brief overview of the Community Park Public Hearing held on November 6, the public meeting held on November 28 and the Public Hearing on December 4 regarding the neighbor's concerns of the park design. The next meeting will be on December 18 at 7:00 p.m. for the City Council's consideration. B. Desert Club Manor Park Name Update: Staff gave a report that the City Council approved the name "Desert Club Manor Park" for the small park between Saguaro and Bottlebrush Drives. C. 20th Anniversary Celebration Committee Report: Commissioner Davis reported that he attended the 20th Anniversary Celebration Committee meeting and was able to contribute to the planning of the event. He had recommended that the event be documented for the City's archives. D. Tree Lighting Ceremony: Commissioners Bechard and Davis reported that the Tree Lighting Ceremony went well; however, it was recommended that a bigger tree be used in the future. The La Quinta High School dancers and the band were very good. E. Washington Street Turn Lane: Commissioner Rebich asked if the left turn lane from Washington Street to Sagebrush Drive could be lengthened . It is her opinion that traffic on Washington Street travels too fast for drivers to safely get into the left turn lane without causing a traffic problem. Staff will forward this request to the Public Works Department. F. Breakfast with Santa: Commissioner Davis reminded the Commission that Breakfast with Santa is SACommunity Services\CSComm\minutesCSC\CSCMIN.12-10-Ol.wpd going to be held on Saturday, December 15 and the Commissioners may wish to help with that event. IX. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioners Davis/Rebich to adjourn the Community Services Commission meeting. Unanimous. Meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m. NEXT MEETING INFORMATION Monday, January 14, 2002 7:00 PM La Quinta Civic Center Study Session Room S bmittep by: orvitz, Co miry4nity Services Director JJ S:\Community Services\CSComm\minutesCSC\CSCMIN. 12- 10-0 l.wpd 0015 •c DEPARTMENT REPORT:4 �— O� �p c� OF TO: FROM: DATE: RE: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager February 5, 2002 Department Report — Response(s) to Public Comments The following is the response to public comments made at the January 15, 2002 City Council meeting: 1. Mr. John McLaughlin, 44-405 Willow Circle, spoke in support of Measure B, which will appear on the March 5, 2002 ballot. He mentioned the need to increase the number of firefighters for adequate coverage of all shifts. 2. Mr. Robert Cox, 78-315 Crestview Terrace, also spoke in support of Measure B, stressing the importance of funding paramedics for each of the City's three fire stations. • The Mayor thanked Mr. McLaughlin and Mr. Cox. No additional response was necessary. 251 a� `,- DEPARTMENT REPORT: L IN RATE) G� OF T19 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of he City Council FROM: Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager M DATE: February 5, 2002 RE: Status of Elected Representation on the Coachella Valley Economic Partnership's Executive Committee This status report is being provided in response to inquiries by the City Council, during the January 15, 2002 Council meeting, in reference to elected/staff representation on Coachella Valley Economic Partnership (CVEP) boards. By way of background, CVEP has two principal bodies, a Board of Directors and an Executive Committee. In addition, three Standing Committees exist in the areas of marketing, investor relations, and legislation. The Board of Directors meets once per month on the first Tuesday of the month from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. at the CVEP offices. The staff representative for the City of La Quinta is the Assistant City Manager, who has assigned as alternate a Management Analyst. The Management Analyst attends the monthly meetings and works closely with the Assistant City Manager on important CVEP matters. The Executive Committee, or governing body of CVEP, meets once per month on the second Monday of the month from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. at the Coco's Restaurant in Palm Desert. In June 2001, CVEP approved a bylaw amendment which allowed elected representation from Coachella Valley cities and tribal governments on the Executive Committee. The amendment called for two elected officials to serve at one time; one representing the East Valley, and the other representing the West Valley. In July 2001, a random drawing was conducted to determine the rotation schedule. The following represents the results of the drawing: A WEST VALLEY Palm Springs Rancho Mirage Desert Hot Springs Palm Desert Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Cathedral City EAST VALLEY Indio Cabazon Band of Mission Indians La Quinta Indian Wells Coachella County of Riverside Subsequent to the Council's inquiry regarding the rotation schedule, staff contacted CVEP for more information. Staff received a letter from the President of CVEP (Attachment 1) advising the City of a vacancy that exists for the East Valley (Palms Springs is currently representing the West Valley). CVEP informs that they approached Indio and the Cabazon Band of Mission Indians regarding their. turn in the rotation, and that both jurisdictions declined participation. Given that delays in response from Indio and Cabazon resulted in the first term being well underway, CVEP suggests that the next East Valley rotation include a full term starting in October 2002. La Quinta, being next in the rotation, will be offered that term. In lieu thereof, however, CVEP has offered La Quinta the opportunity to fill the remainder of the first term (i.e., from now through September 2002), with the next full term then offered to Indian Wells. Unless directed otherwise by the City Council, staff will bring the matter back to the Council this summer for selection of a representative to fill a full term on the CVEP Executive Committee beginning October 2002. Attachment: 1. Letter from CVEP dated January 17, 2002 002 ATTACHMENT 1 Helping Innovative Companies Exp andlRelocate to The Coachella Valley. 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Ste. 205* Palm Desert, CA 92260 (760) 340-1575 office (760) 340-9212 fax January 17, 2002 Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager City of La Quinta, California 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: EASTERN COACHELLA VALLEY VACANCY ON COACHELLA VALLEY ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP EXECUTIVE BOARD Dear Mr. Weiss: The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a formal notice of vacancy for an Eastern Coachella Valley elected representative on the Coachella Valley Economic Partnership Executive Board. This letter also serves as an invitation for the City of La Quinta to provide an elected representative to fill said vacancy. By way of background CVEP Investors passed a bylaw amendment in June 2001. Said amendment called for one elected representative from each end of the Coachella Valley to serve on CVEP's Executive Board on a one-year rotating basis. In July 2001, a rotation was established for each side of the Coachella Valley, as you will recall the City of La Quinta was chosen Pin the rotation. For further background, CVEP's bylaws have long stated that investors that provide resources in the amount of $50,000 or more are automatically eligible to be on the Executive Board. This provision is independent of the municipal rotation system. The County of Riverside qualifies under this provision and does provide an elected representative to occupy this seat. With respect to the Eastern Coachella Valley rotation, the City of Indio formally declined participation in September 2001. The Cabazon Band of Mission Indians was provided the next option. We were provided in November, 2001 a formal decline of the offer to serve on the Executive Board. 0133 25 Weiss, Mark CVEP Executive Board January 17, 2002 Page 2 of 2 As we had already began the Board year for 2001-2002 (October 1, 2001- September 30, 2002), it was determined by the Executive Committee that we would leave the seat vacant until such time as we could make a determination if there was interest in filling the seat for a full term. The Executive Board felt comfortable that the interests of the Eastern Coachella Valley could be met for this first year via the County representative, even though their participation on the Board is independent of the municipal rotation. This all being said, it is intended that the City of La Quinta would be provided first option as the Eastern Coachella Valley representative for the Board Year 2002-2003. If the City of La Quinta would opt to occupy this seat immediately instead of waiting for a full -term, CVEP would be honored to have representation on its Executive Board by an elected official for the City of La Quinta. Please let me know if you have additional questions. I can be reached at (760) 340-1575. Sincerely, Tl",,�, � q - &-,L, Michael Bracken President 004 a'�(�`a�•c DEPARTMENT REPORT: f ' C L 4 4Q OF 9ti TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager A DATE: February 5, 2002 RE: Mid -Year Report on City of La Quinta Marketing Program Attached please find a mid -year marketing report as submitted by Kiner/Goodsell. It highlights the marketing items completed to date for fiscal year 2001-2002, and offers a preview of projects in progress targeted for completion before the end of the fiscal year. 25� 000 finer oodsell Mid -Year Marketing Plan Update Kiner/Goodsell for the City of La Quinta January 28, 2002 The first half of the 2001-2002 marketing plan has been implemented. The following recap offers information as to what has been completed thus far: New Economic Development City of La Quinta Informercial • Infomercial was produced in October, encouraging business development in La Quinta with a new theme; "growth with charm." • Broadcast began in November in the Coachella Valley, San Diego, the Pacific Northwest, and parts of the Inland Empire. Infomercial will air in the Midwest in March and April. Infomercial will also be edited to be incorporated into "Desert Cities Report" — a public television program on KOCE in Orange County. New Economic Development :30 and :10 second spots • New spots were completed in October and focus on encouraging people to visit/support City businesses and restaurants. • Spots began airing in November during the news on local stations; KMIR and KESQ. Full -page Economic Development Print Ad in Alaska Airlines magazine • Ad depicted La Quinta lifestyle and how you can have "both" business and pleasure in La Quinta. • Ad appeared in Alaska Airlines' special section about the Palm Springs Desert Resorts in November. Alaska Airlines is one of the most prominent carriers flying into Palm Springs, and reaches our target audience — people who are already coming to La Quinta for pleasure, who might want to consider opening or relocating their business here. 002 Participation in International Council of Shopping Centers' Western Division Conference • Co -sponsored the Beer & Wine Reception for the event, giving away dinner and golf gift certificates as prizes to entice those who want to expand a store/restaurant to come check out La Quinta. This year, we approached the opportunity somewhat differently — having people drop business cards at our booth for the giveaways rather than just having the giveaways distributed by ICSC. This allowed us access to information from the business cards in order to do a follow-up mailing to those who stopped by our booth and entered our drawing. Hosted the Third Annual Realtors' Breakfast • Gathered commercial real estate and financial professionals to update them on the progress, as well as opportunity, in La Quinta. This was the third annual event, and was attended by approximately 40 people. Advertorial in Palm Springs Life's Desert Progress Issues • Special issue featured an update on all Coachella Valley cities, and gave the City of La Quinta an opportunity to update the Coachella Valley and beyond regarding its latest growth and progress. Appearance in Golf Cart Parade • The City continues to be involved in the local community, and with this event, members of the City Council and Gamby the Quail appeared in the popular local Golf Cart Parade driving one of the new Neighborhood Electric Vehicles known as "the Lido." Created full -page print advertisement for Bob Hope Chrysler Classic Program Guide • Created an ad that fulfilled both an economic development message as well as one that encouraged the support of local businesses. 26 003 OTHER ITEMS SEPARATE FROM MARKETING PLAN: Drafted City's 20th Anniversary Logo • Worked with Community Services Department and at the direction of the 20th Anniversary Committee to draft special logo for the City's 201h Anniversary. Created artwork for City Vehicles • Created new artwork for the City vehicles. Hosted first four "Village Faire" events • Coordinated events which have gathered hundreds in the local community for food, entertainment, shopping, fun and free activities for the kids. IN PROGRESS ITEMS: • Kiner/Goodsell to present a new concept for another Shop/Dine program to support City businesses and restaurants. • Kiner/Goodsell brainstrorming advertising ideas in support of the new restaurant and business openings in La Quinta. • Kiner/Goodsell to create full -page ad for Franchise Times magazine. • Kiner/Goodsell creating photo file for internal use by City staff. • Kiner/Goodsell working with Community Services Department to create advertising for the 20th Anniversary festivities. • Kiner/Goodsell to begin building ideas for 2002-2003 marketing plan for the City of La Quinta. Ad 004 �. DEPARTMENT REPORT: La-1 c tNComfn ,�4� ti OF T TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager FYI DATE: February 5, 2002 SUBJECT: Report on Federal Member's Request Funding Staff recently met with two members of Congresswoman Mary Bono's staff: Linda Valter, Legislative Director and Frank Cullen, Jr., Chief of Staff, to discuss the procedure for obtaining federal funding for local and regional projects. A local agency may make a request for federal funding via a letter to its congressional representative. If the representative feels that the project has merit, he/she will request that an appropriation be made during the federal budget process. Requests are due to the representatives by February 15, 2002. Staff is working with Congresswoman Bono's staff to determine the exact information needed for the letter and the amount of funding that can be requested. Staff is proposing to request funding for the new La Quinta Library, as it fits in with federal goals such as improved literacy, local and regional benefit, and community support. Once the letter has been finalized, a copy will be distributed to the Council. �s� DEPARTMENT REPORT: 3 ~ A FEBRUARY 19 MARCH 1 MARCH 5 MARCH 19 MARCH 20 APRIL 2 APRIL 5 APRIL 16 MAY 7 MAY 21 CITY COUNCIL'S UPCOMING EVENTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING VILLAGE FAIRE EVENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING (General Plan Hearing) CITY COUNCIL MEETING VILLAGE FAIRE EVENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 2002 Monthly Planner .. y . .. , 0 Fl. to. WFA. .. • x 3 1 2 A e , January :;, r March S M T W T F S S M T W T F S o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 123 4 5 6 7 8 9 �+ 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .a g 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 r 31 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2:00 PM City 10:00 AM ALRC Council Meeting 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V. 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM Energy/ Safety -Perkins Mosquito Abate. Pena Envi-Sniff 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins 5:30 PM Invest- 7:00 PM Cultural -Perkins 7:00 PM Planning ment Advisory Arts Commission 6:00 PM League Commission Board of Cities-Riv.Div. Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission Valentines Day 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 President's 9:00 AM CVB- 3:30 PM Historic Day (City Henderson Preservation Hall 2:00 PM City Commission CLOSED) Council Meeting 24 25 26 27 28 6:00 PM CVAG- 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM LAFCO,:r Exec Com-Pena Commission Human/Comm- Henderson Meeting Adolph 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson 7:00 PM Special ' City Council ' Meeting (General Plan), mr �F a H � M !y Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 1/29/2002 March 2002 Monthly Planner Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 1/29/2002 April 2002 Monthly Planner Sunday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 4 5 6 ,rsY,� 2:00 PM City 10:00 AM ALRC Council Meeting t ' 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V. 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM Energy/ Safety -Perkins Mosquito Abate. Pena Envi-Sniff 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins 5:30 PM Invest- 7:00 PM Cultural Daylight Savings -Perkins 7:00 PM Planning ment Advisory Arts Commission Time 6:00 PM League Commission Board of Cities-Riv.Div. Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 9:00 AM CVB- 3:30 PM Historic Henderson Preservation 2:00 PM City Commission Council Meeting 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM LAFCO- Commission Human/Comm- Henderson Meeting Adolph 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson 28 29 30 ad,�'F �Y � 't a'i� i`. f'��J� �?m � +9. ��.4i •w ms' az �. i o"',A 6:00 PM CVAG-k� Exec Com-Pena a March May S M T W T F S S M T W T F S '1 2 1 2 3 4 +.` 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 12 13 14 15 16 17 18Yffib 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4, 31 26 27 28 29 30 31 .._ ' ,p Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 1/29/2002 Z r 1 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 3-$ 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: June Greek, City Clerk DATE: February 5, 2002 SUBJECT: City Pins An Items of Interest (101), was recently distributed to acquaint the Mayor and City Council with a suggested design change for the City Pin. Staff understands how busy the members of the City Council are but would appreciate receiving any input, suggested additions or deletions, etc., prior to placing the order. The proposed design can be adapted to serve as a City Pin and to commemorate the City's 201h Anniversary, if the Council so wishes. If modifications are desired, we need to allow enough time to have the pin re -designed (approximately 2 weeks) as well as another six (6) weeks for production. 26 Truman School Winter 2001/2002 Art Wall Participants Carlos Jose Aguilar Gussy Alexander Teddy Alexander Holly Armour Melissa Becerra Marlene Beltran Irving Calderon Bryttni Chisholm Amanda Erickson Karina Flores Samantha Fogle Claudia Gonzalez Korey Gunter Emilio Hernandez Brittney Holguin Jordan Hop Amanda I mel Alyssa Jaraczewski Aaron Jaraczewski Caitlin Jeffredo Billy Jones Regan King Nicholas Lafaro Brandon Lewis Alanah Manning 26 Kayla Martinez Corey Maverick Joseph McManus Jessica Mitchell Atalia Mora Marie Angelina Munoz Kyle Ormiston Jonathan Ornelas Crystal Ortiz Logan Perry Brittanie Pimentel Spencer Pixley Jessica Powers Brittany Price Aaron Riggs Nicole Rivera Erin Schumaier Mallory Siebuhr Evan Uveste Javier Valdez Sarah White Caleb Wollaston Emma Zimmer AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 5, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Public Hearing to Certify a Mitigated Negative / Declaration of Environmental Impact for PUBLIC HEARING: Environmental Assessment 2001-436; General Plan Amendment 2001-083 and Zone Change 2001-105 to Change the Land Use Designation from High Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and Tourist Commercial; and Specific Plan 2001-055 to Review Development Principles and Design Guidelines for Tourist Commercial Uses Including Hotels and Retail -Related Uses, and Residential Development Including Townhouses and Single Family Residences for "The Gateway" Located at the Southeast Corner of Miles Avenue and Washington Street Applicant: City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council Certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-436. 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment 2001-083. 3. Move to take up Ordinance No. approving Zone Change 2001-105 by title and number only and waive further reading. Move to introduce Ordinance No. on first reading. 4. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 2001-055, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: 271 None. cAMyFi1es\Backup\wp{wp}.bk3 BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The approximate 50-acre subject property is situated at the southeast corner of Miles Avenue and Washington Street, a major entry point to the City. The property is bound by the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel to the south, the Acacia subdivision and vacant residential land to the north across Miles Avenue and the Desert Pride and Sienna Del Rey single-family subdivision to the east. To the west is vacant land within the City of Indian Wells. Project Request The following applications have been filed for review: 1. A General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from High Density Residential to a combination of Medium Density Residential and Tourist Commercial. 2. A Zoning Change from High Density Residential to Tourist Commercial and Medium Density Residential. 3. A Specific Plan (Attachment 1) to establish development standards and design guidelines for a mixed use development including resort style hotels, timeshares, condominium -hotels, up -scale restaurants, and commercial retail uses. Also, proposed are designated areas for townhouses, single family residential houses and a neighborhood park. (Attachment 1). The Specific Plan includes a number of development standards unique to the site and the uses proposed. The following table illustrates the changes from the Zoning Code development standards to the Specific Plan development standards. TOURIST COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Minimum perimeter building/landscape setback (in ft.) from Washington Street Minimum perimeter building/landscape setback (in ft.) from Miles Avenue Minimum perimeter building/landscape setback (in ft.)from residential districts Parking (Resort) Parking (Commercial/Retail) Specific Plan Zoning 20/20 30/20 20/20 30/20 50/15 30/15 1.5/room 1.5/room 1 /250 sq.ft. 1/250 sq.ft. 27 cAMyFi1es\Backup\wp{wp).bk3 DETACHED DWELLING UNITS Specific Plan Minimum lot size 7,200 sq.ft. Minimum lot frontage 60 ft. Minimum garage setback 25 ft. (*Zoning Code allows 20 feet with a roll up door) Minimum rear yard setback 20 ft. Minimum livable floor area for single-family detached excluding garage 1200 sq.ft. ATTACHED DWELLING UNITS/RESORT CASITAS Interior street building/landscape setback Minimum front yard setback Minimum livable floor area Minimum perimeter building/landscape setback from Tourist Commercial District (attached dwelling units) Minimum perimeter building/landscape setback from Tourist Commercial District) (resort casitas) Parking (resort casitas) Planning Commission Review: Zoning 5,000 sq.ft. 50 ft. 25 ft.* 15 ft. 1400 sq.ft. 20 ft. Not addressed 20 ft. 20 ft. 1000 sq.ft. 1400 sq.ft. 20/20 ft. Not addressed 0 ft. Not addressed 1 /bedroom Not addressed The Planning Commission on January 22, 2002 (Attachment 2) recommended approval of the Specific Plan subject to the following modifications: 1 . Page 5. Land Use Area I. Tourist Commercial Development Standards. Add a minimum 30 foot building setback from Miles Avenue and Washington Street. 2. Page 6. Land Use Area II. Detached Dwelling Units. The development standards shall be changed in that the minimum livable floor area for single family detached excluding the garage shall be 1,400 square feet with 15% at 1,200 square feet. 3. Page 7. Land Use Area II. Attached Dwelling Units/Resort Casitas. The minimum livable floor area shall be 1,400 square feet with 30% allowed to be under 1,400 square feet. 4. Page 7. Land Use Area III. B. Permitted Uses. Add a #5. Parking Lot. 5. Page 14. Off -Site Improvements. The Public Works Department shall consider the option to install a left turn pocket for Seeley Drive southbound. 0 r+ A c:\MyFi1es\Backup\wp{wp},bk3 Staff Comments: Condition 1: When the Specific Plan was prepared, staff was building in flexibility based upon past practices, for the development of the project. For example, the recently approved Point Happy and La Quinta Court Specific Plans allowed for the building setbacks along Washington Street to be 20 feet, rather than the required 30 feet as required in the Zoning Code. The Planning Commission chose to maintain the 30 foot standard rather than allowing the flexibility for the 20 foot setback. Condition 2: The Specific Plan includes 90 single family lots. These single family units will consist of market rate and affordable homes. The specific ratio has not been determined at this time. The Specific Plan, as drafted, permits a minimum 1,200 square foot home, rather than the required 1,400 square foot home. Past affordable projects that contain market rate and affordable units had houses with varying square footages. For example, the Seasons project, which contained 60 single family residences, has houses ranging in size from 1,285, 1,371 and 1,532 square feet. The Miraflores project has single family house sizes of 1,710, 1,860 and 2,010 square feet. The Planning Commission permitted up to 15 % of the 90 units, or 14 units, to be under the 1,400 square foot house size. Condition 3: The Specific Plan proposes up to 67 attached units. The Planning Commission allowed 30% (or 20 units) to have a square footage of under 1,400 square feet. The Seasons project was approved with one and two bedroom attached units having a size of 600 and 835 square feet respectively and the Miraflores attached units range for the one and two bedroom from 660 to 865 square feet respectively. Public Notice: This application was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on January 10, 2002. All property owners within 500 feet of the site were mailed a copy of the public hearing notice as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Public Agency Review: All written comments received are on file with the Community Development Department. All applicable agency comments received have been made part of the Conditions of Approval for this case. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council Certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-436. r+ Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment 2 t 2001-083. O C 4 c:\MyFi1es\Backup\wp{wp).bk3 Move to take up Ordinance No. approving Zone Change 2001-105 by title and number only and waive further reading. Move to introduce Ordinance No. on first reading. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 2001-055, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval; or 2. Do not adopt the above -mentioned Resolutions; or 3. Continue the Public Hearing to February 19, 2002; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted by, Herman munity Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Specific Plan document (Council only) 2. Planning Commission minutes for January 22, 2002 c:\MyFiles\Backup\wp{wp).bk3 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-436 PREPARED FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-083, ZONE CHANGE 2001-105 AND SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-436 APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 5th day of February, 2002 hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2001-436 for General Plan Amendment 2001-083, Zone Change 2001-105 and Specific Plan 2001-055, for lands bounded by Miles Avenue on the north, Washington Street on the West, and the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel on the south; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 22nd day of January, 2002 hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2001-436 for General Plan Amendment 2001-083, Zone Change 2001-105 and Specific Plan 2001-055, for lands bounded by Miles Avenue on the north, Washington Street on the West, and the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel on the south, more particularly described as follows: APN 604-040-012, 013, 023 and 037 WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study (EA 2001-436) and has determined that although the proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-083, Zone Change 2001-105 and Specific Plan 2001-055 could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because appropriate mitigation measures were made a part of the assessment and included in the conditions of approval and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify certifying said Environmental Assessment: n U 13 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\GatewayEA.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-436 - The Gateway Adopted: February 5, 2002 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-083, Zone Change 2001-105 and Specific Plan 2001-055 will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2001-436. 2. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-083, Zone Change 2001-105 and Specific Plan 2001-055 will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 4. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-083, Zone Change 2001-105 and Specific Plan 2001-055 do not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. 5.. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-083, Zone Change 2001-105 and Specific Plan 2001-055 will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. 6. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-083, Zone Change 2001-105 and Specific Plan 2001-055 will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 8. The Planning Commission has considered the Environmental Assessment 2001- 436 and the Environmental Assessment reflects the independent judgement of the City. 2 rl j UkL7 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\GatewayEA.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-436 - The Gateway Adopted: February 5, 2002 9. The City has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 9. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitutes the findings of the City Council for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby certify Environmental Assessment 2001-436 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum on file in the Community Development Department. 3. That Environmental Assessment 2001-436 reflects the independent judgement of the City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 5th day of February 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk 0-, n 2 (�J UC3 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\GatewayEA.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-436 - The Gateway Adopted: February 5, 2002 City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\GatewayEA.wpd Environmental Checklist Form ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-436 Planning Commission Resolution 2002-017 City Council Resolution 2002- 1. Project Title: General Plan Amendment 2001-083, Zone Change 2001- 105, Specific Plan 2001-055 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Jerry Herman 760-777-7125 4. Project Location: Southeastern corner of Miles Avenue and Washington Street 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 6. General Plan Designation: Current: High Density Residential, Park Proposed: Tourist Commercial, Medium Density Residential, Park 7. Zoning: Current: High Density Residential, Park Proposed: Tourist Commercial, Medium Density Residential, Park 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) The General Plan and Zone Change are required to allow the development of the proposed hotel and medium density residential land uses. The Specific Plan establishes design standards and guidelines for the development of approximately 22 acres of tourist commercial, consisting of two three-story hotel facilities, commercial retail and restaurant uses; approximately 19 acres of single family and townhome development; approximately 7 acres of watercourse (Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel); and approximately 6 acres of park. Altogether, the property is approximately 54 acres in size. 9. Surrounding Lane Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings. North: Miles Avenue, Vacant, Single Family Residential South: Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, Single Family Residential East: Vacant, single family residential West: Washington Street, vacant 2 8 (i 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) - 1110 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\GatewayCkLst.WPD Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology and Soils Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared J I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Christine di lorio Printed Name December 5, 2001 Date CITY OF LA QUINTA 2 8 1 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\GatewayCkLst.WPD 2 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced) . 5) Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analysis are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The analysis of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance U12 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\GatewayCkLst.WPD Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (Visual Simulation, The Keith Companies) b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (General Plan EIR, page 5-12 ff.) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Visual Simulation, The Keith Companies) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Specific Plan document) II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Dept. Of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29, 5-32) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (Aerial photographs) III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact X X X X X X X X X X U13 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\GatewayCkLst.WPD 4 IV. LM d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Specific Plan document) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Specific Plan document) BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) c) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) Either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (La Quinta Municipal Code; General Plan) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? (See Sources consulted at the end of this checklist) X X X X X X 284 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\GatewayCkLst.WPD u14 b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resources (i.e., an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? (See Sources consulted at the end of this checklist) c) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? (Paleontological Map, City of La Quinta) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (See Sources consulted at the end of this checklist) VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Geotechnical Engineering Report, Earth Systems Southwest, November 2001) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (General Plan EIR, page 4- 30 ff. and Geotechnical Engineering Report, Earth Systems Southwest, November 2001) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff. and Geotechnical Engineering Report, Earth Systems Southwest, November 2001) iv) Landslides? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff. And Geotechnical Engineering Report, Earth Systems Southwest, November 2001) c) Be located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff. and Geotechnical Engineering Report, Earth Systems Southwest, November 2001) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff. and Geotechnical Engineering Report, Earth Systems Southwest, November 2001) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-32 and Geotechnical Engineering Report, Earth Systems Southwest, November 2001) X KI X MEMO E No 3� G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\GatewayCkLst.WPD 6 " U13 VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Application Materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Application Materials) c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Application Materials) d) Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Riverside County Hazardous Materials Listing) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip; would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-1 1) h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildlands fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-26, 6-27) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (General Plan EIR, page 4-57 ff.) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR, page 4- 59 ff.) MEMO MEMO MEMO MEMO In X zs0 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\GatewayCkLst.WPD d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on - or off -site? (General Plan EIR, page 4-59 ff.) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems to control? (General Plan EIR, page 4-59 ff.) f) Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-13 ) g) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-13) IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Project Description) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local costal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purposes of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan Land Use Element) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-5) X. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29) XI. NOISE: Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-157 ff. and Revised Preliminary Acoustical Analysis, Gordon Bricken & Associates, December 2001) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?(General Plan EIR, p. 4-157 ff. and Revised Preliminary Acoustical Analysis, Gordon Bricken & Associates, December 2001) X X X X In X X X X X X G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\GatgwayCkLst.WPD u 1 '7 c) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-157 ff. and Revised Preliminary Acoustical Analysis, Gordon Bricken & Associates, December 2001) d) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Application Materials) e) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive levels? (General Plan map) XI1. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) ? (General Plan, page 2-14) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing . elsewhere? (Application Materials) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff. ) Police protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff. ) Schools? (General Plan MEA, page 4-9 ff. ) Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA, page 4-14 ff. ) XIV. RECREATION: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application Materials) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application Materials) X X X X X X X M X X �rJ X X �0 v G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\GatewayCkLst.WPD XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-126 ff. and La Quinta Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis, Urban Crossroads, December 2001) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-126 ff. and La Quinta Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis, Urban Crossroads, December 2001) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (Application Materials) d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-126 ff.) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Application Materials) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Application Materials) g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Application Materials) XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24 ) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, page 4-27) d) Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, page 4- 20) e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, page 4-20) f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?(General Plan MEA, page 4-28) MEMO E No MMME MMME MEMO 281 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\GatewayCkLst.WPD 10 U 1 J XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSIS. X X X Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. None b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. See attached Addendum. SOURCES: Master Environmental Assessment, City of La Quinta General Plan 1992 General Plan, City of La Quinta, 1992 SCAQMD CEQA Handbook Paleontological -Lakebed Delineation Map, City of La Quinta City of La Quinta Municipal Code � 29 "Archaeological Monitoring Report, Miles Avenue Borrow Site," prepared by CRM Tech, July 2001� G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\GatewayCkLst.WPD 11 "Final Report Archaeological Mitigation of Project Effects to a Native American Cremation Found on Parcel Map No. 26860." prepared by CRM Tech, February 2001 "Final Report Archaeological Testing and Site Evaluation on Parcel Map No. 26860," prepared by CRM Tech, June 2000 "Phase I Archaeological Assessment of 54.65 Acres at the Southeast Corner of Washington Street and Miles Avenue," prepared by Archaeological Advisory Group, June 1999 "La Quinta Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis," prepared by Urban Crossroads, December 2001 "Revised Preliminary Acoustical Analysis," prepared by Gordon Bricken & Associates, December 2001 "Geotechnical Engineering Report," prepared by Earth Systems Southwest, November 2001 Visual Impact Simulation, prepared by the Keith Companies, December 2001 29 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\GatewayCkLst.WPD 12 Addendum for Environmental Assessment 2001-436 Planning Commission Resolution 2002-017 City Council Resolution 2002- I. a) & c) The proposed project occurs at a high topographic point in the city, and is bordered on the east and north by single family residential development. In order to assess the potential impacts to the viewshed of these single family residential units, a visual impact simulation was conducted'. The simulations were conducted for views from the east and south to the west, and from the north and east to the south and west. The analysis clearly demonstrates that the scale of the proposed project will not eliminate the views of existing or future residential units to the surrounding mountains. The impacts of structures on the project site will be less than significant. III. a) & d) Air quality in the Coachella Valley and the City is primarily affected by vehicular emissions. The development of this project could generate up to 6,170 average daily trips2. Based on this trip generation, the project at buildout will generate the following pollutants. Running Exhaust Emissions (pounds/day) PM 10 PM 10 PM 10 CO ROC NOx Exhaust Brakes Tires 50 mph 223.1 8.58 45.7 -- 0..95 0.95 6 Daily Threshold 550 75 100 150 Based on 6,170 trips/day and average trip length of 7 miles, using EMFAC7G Model provided by California Air Resources Board. Assumes catalytic light autos at 75°F. * Operational thresholds provided by SCAQMD for assistance in determining the significance of a project and the need for an EIR. Visual Impact Simulations, The Keith Companies, December 2001. 2 "La Quinta Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis," prepared by Urban Crossroads, December 2001. 29041. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\GatewayAdd.WPD 1 V 622 As demonstrated above, the operational impacts associated with air quality on the project site are expected to be less than significant. I I I.c) The Coachella Valley is a non -attainment area for PM 10 (particulate matter of 10 microns or smaller). The construction of the proposed project has the potential to generate dust, which could contribute to the PM 10 problem in the area. In order to control PM 10, the City has imposed standards and requirements on development to control dust. The applicant will be required to submit such a plan prior to initiation of any earth moving activity at the site. In addition, the potential impacts associated with PM 10 can be mitigated by the mitigation measures below. 1. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. 2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation. 3. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. Cut and fill quantities will be balanced on site. 5. Any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. 6. Watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on -going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. 7. All disturbed areas shall be treated to prevent erosion until the site is constructed upon. Pad sites which are to remain undeveloped shall be seeded with either a desert wildflower mix or grass seed, or chemical stabilizer. 8. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. Perimeter landscaping on Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street, and the retention basin landscaping shall be completed with the first phase of development. 9. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean up of construction -related dirt on approach routes to the site. Q n 290 0 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\GatewayAdd.WPD 2 : i 10. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. 11 All buildings on the project site shall conform to energy use guidelines in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, the impacts to air quality from buildout will not be significant. IV. a) The proposed project is within the mitigation fee area for the Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan, and will be required to pay fees to mitigate the potential impact on this species. The payment of the fees serves to mitigate the impacts to a less than significant level. V. b) & d) Several cultural resource studies were completed for the subject property3. The surveys included extensive testing and the excavation of a cremation site. The work done on the site to date has been comprehensive, but additional resources may be buried within the project area. As a result, to ensure that the potential impacts to cultural resources are mitigated, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1. During any and all earth moving activities on any portion of the project site, a qualified archaeological monitor shall be present. The monitor shall be empowered to stop or redirect activities on the site should a resource be identified. A final report shall be filed with the Community Development Department prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any building on the project site. VI. a) ii) A geotechnical investigation was completed for the project site 4. The site occurs in a seismic Zone IV. The site, as with the balance of the City, will be subject to strong groundshaking during a seismic event. The City has implemented standards in the Uniform Building Code to ensure the highest 3 "Archaeological Monitoring Report, Miles Avenue Borrow Site," prepared by CRM Tech, July 2001 "Final Report Archaeological Mitigation of Project Effects to a Native American Cremation Found on Parcel Map No. 26860," prepared by CRM Tech, February 2001 "Final Report Archaeological Testing and Site Evaluation on Parcel Map No. 26860," prepared by CRM Tech, June 2000 "Phase I Archaeological Assessment of 54.65 Acres at the Southeast Corner of Washington Street and Miles Avenue," prepared by Archaeological Advisory Group, June 1999 4 "Geotechnical Engineering Report," prepared by Earth Systems Southwest, November 2001. ti J "A ,ark G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\GatewayAdd.WPD 3 construction standards are applied to protect against seismic hazard. These standards are expected to ensure that impacts associated with seismic ground shaking are reduced to a less than significant level. IX. b) The proposed General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone will change the land uses on the project site from High Density Residential and Park to Tourist Commercial, Medium Density Residential, and Park. The surrounding land use designations include Park, Low Density Residential and Watercourse. The change in land use represents a natural extension of the land use plan, insofar as it places more intense land use (Tourist Commercial) at the intersection of Miles and Washington, and steps down the land use intensity as it proceeds easterly. The Medium Density Residential will be an effective buffer to the existing and future low density development to the east and south. The existing High Density Residential designation is a relatively intense land use, which would not have been buffered from the Low Density development to the east. The proposed General Plan and Change of Zone will therefore represent a less than significant impact on the land use pattern in the City. XI. a) A noise study was completed for the proposed project'. The project site is currently subject to high noise levels, and will continue to be impacted by noise as the project build out. The noise levels will not be reduced to City standards without mitigation. In order to achieve acceptable noise levels for the hotels and townhomes on the subject property, the noise study proposes several setback areas for the construction of sound walls, depending on the site design. These mitigation measures include sound walls and/or berms ranging from 0 to 10 feet in height, and are variable depending on the finish grade of the individual sites within the project. With the implementation of the mitigation measures included in the noise study, however, noise levels on the site at buildout can be reduced to an acceptable level. Since no Site Development Permit is proposed at this time for any portion of the site, and specific mitigation cannot therefore be evaluated, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1. Any site development permit submitted for any portion of the site shall either: a) Demonstrate conformance with the mitigation measures provided in the "Revised Preliminary Acoustical Analysis" prepared by Gordon Bricken & Associates on December 6, 2001; or 5 "Revised Preliminary Acoustical Analysis," prepared by Gordon Bricken & Associates, December 2001. V G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\GatewayAdd.WPD 4 b) Submit a noise study specifically prepared for that site development permit which demonstrates that the noise levels can be reduced on the site to the noise standards in effect at the time of submittal of the application. XIII. a) The proposed development will have a less than significant impact on public services. All areas of the proposed Specific Plan will be served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, acting under City contract. Site development will generate property tax, transient occupancy tax and sales taxes which will offset the costs of added police and fire services. XV. a) The project will be required to pay the mandated school fees as development occurs. These fees mitigate the students generated, and offset the impacts to schools. The collection of property tax, and the generation of sales tax will generate revenues to the City to offset the added costs associated with the provision of municipal services. The project will be required to participate in the City's Impact Fee Program, which helps to offset roadway improvement costs. A traffic study was conducted for the proposed projects. The study found that buildout of the proposed project would generate up to 6,170 average daily trips, of which 310 would occur during the AM peak, and 465 during the PM peak hour. The volume generated by the proposed project, combined with the growth in traffic volumes on City streets from other project in the area resulted in recommended mitigation measures in the study in order to maintain City level of service standards. These mitigation measures are enumerated below: 1. Miles Avenue and Washington Street shall be constructed to their full half -width right-of-way with development of the first phase of the project. 2. A traffic signal shall be installed at the intersection of Seeley Drive and Miles Avenue in conjunction, as warranted. 3. Access to the project from Washington Street shall be limited to right -in, right -out only. 4. Left turn pocket on Seeley Drive, accessing westbound Miles Avenue, shall be a minimum of 100 feet in length. Left turn pocket on westbound Miles Avenue, accessing southbound Seeley Drive, shall be a minimum of 150 feet in length. 0-4 i 1 N 6 "La Quinta Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis," prepared by Urban Crossroads, December 20-01. 0 2 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\GatewayAdd.WPD 5 With the implementation of these mitigation measures, impacts of the project » on the City's circulation system shall be less than significant. XVI. a)-f) The buildout of the site will require service from utility providers. The overall impacts on these services is not expected to be significant, insofar as these suppliers will charge the businesses and residents for their services, and provide improvements to these services as needed. In addition, connection fees will be required at construction of any project. These fees and charges will mitigate the potential impacts to a less than significant level. 297 u27 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\GatewayAdd.WPD 6 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CHANGE IN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FROM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND PARK AND RECREATION TO TOURIST COMMERCIAL, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND PARK AND RECREATION FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY BOUNDED BY MILES AVENUE ON THE NORTH, COACHELLA VALLEY STORMWATER CHANNEL ON THE SOUTH, WASHINGTON STREET ON THE WEST AND INCO SIENNA AND ACACIA SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION ON THE EAST CASE NO.: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-083 APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, the City Coiuncil of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5th day of February, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to review a General Plan Amendment to change land use designations from High Density Residential to Tourist Commercial, Medium Density Residential uses for the property generally located at the southeast corner of Miles Avenue and Washington Street, north of the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 22nd day of January, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to review a General Plan Amendment to change land use designations from High Density Residential to Tourist Commercial, Medium Density Residential uses for the property generally located at the southeast corner of Miles Avenue and Washington Street, north of the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, and more particularly described as: APNs 604-040-012, 604-040-013, 604-040-023 and 604-040-037; and WHEREAS, said Specific Plan has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-63), in that an Environmental Assessment (EA 2001-436) was prepared for Specific Plan 2001-055 and found that although the proposed project will have environmental impacts, all impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings of approval to justify approving General Plan Amendment 2001-083: 0 01-) U23 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\GatewayGPA.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- General Plan Amendment 2001-083 - The Gateway Adopted: February 5, 2002 1. Internal General Plan Consistency. The proposed Amendment to the Land Use Map is consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan in that it changes existing High Density Residential land uses to include Tourist Commercial uses and Medium Density Residential uses. The Medium Density Residential serves as a buffer between adjacent Low Density Residential and Tourist commercial uses. 2. Public Welfare. The proposed Amendment will not negatively impact public safety and welfare due to the relatively minor change in land use designations. 3. General Plan Compatibility. The proposed General Plan Amendment will be compatible with surrounding land uses. Tourist commercial uses are located at a major intersection providing adequate access and circulation to and from the property. Medium Density Residential serves as an adequate buffer between adjacent Low Density land uses and Tourist Commercial land use. 4. Property Suitability. The proposed Amendment is suitable for the subject site. 5. Change in Circumstances. The continued development of the City requires the continued analysis of the best build out configuration. This Amendment accommodates the changing market and desires of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby confirm the conclusion that Environmental Assessment 2001-436 assessed the environmental concerns of the General Plan Amendment; and, 3. That it does approve General Plan Amendment 2001-083 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as contained in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 5th day of February, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: 2(ln NOES: u23 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\GatewayGPA.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- General Plan Amendment 2001-083 - The Gateway Adopted: February 5, 2002 ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\GatewayGPA.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- General Plan Amendment 2001-083 - The Gateway Adopted: February 5, 2002 EXHIBIT "A" Lh M N i� r W QL6 �7 M N L" G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\GatewayGPA.wpd ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA ASSIGNING ZONING TO 50 ACRES GENERALLY BOUNDED BY MILES AVENUE ON THE NORTH, COACHELLA VALLEY STORMWATER CHANNEL ON THE SOUTH, WASHINGTON STREET ON THE WEST AND INCO CENTURY SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION ON THE EAST CASE NO.: ZONE CHANGE 2001-105 LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY THE GATEWAY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5th day of February, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for La Quinta Redevelopment Agency for review of a Zone Change to change the zoning designation on 50 acres generally located at the southeast corner of Miles Avenue and Washington Street, north of the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, and more particularly described as: APNs 604-040-012, 604-040-013, 604-040-023 and 604-040-037 WHEREAS, said Specific Plan has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-63), in that an Environmental Assessment (EA 2001-436) was prepared for Specific Plan 2001-055 and found that although the proposed project will have environmental impacts, all impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings recommending approval of said Zone Change: 1 . The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan, and the Land Use Map for the General Plan and surrounding development and land use designations, ensuring land use compatibility. 2. The Zone Change will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, as it has been designed to be compatible with surrounding development, and conform with the City's standards and requirements. 3. The Zone Change is compatible with the City's Zoning Ordinance in that it supports the development of Low Density Residential, Medium Density and Tourist Commercial uses. 3 03? G:\WPDOCS\Ordinances\Gateway.wpd Ordinance No. Zone Change 2001-105 - "The Gateway" Adopted: February 5, 2002 4. The Zone Change supports the orderly development of the City. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California that it does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. PURPOSE. To rezone a portion of land generally located at the southeastern corner of Miles Avenue and Washington Street, from High Density Residential and Park and Recreation to Tourist Commercial, Medium Density Residential and Park and Recreation for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as contained in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of. SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL. This Zone Change has complied with the requirements of the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended) and adopted by City Council Resolution 83-68, in that the Community Development Director has determined that the proposed Zone Change will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4: POSTING. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three public places designated by Resolution of the City Council, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on this 5th day of February, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PEIVA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 3� 033 G:\WPDOCS\Ordinances\Gateway.wpd Ordinance No. Zone Change 2001-105 - "The Gateway" Adopted: February 5, 2002 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 3 v► It 034 G:\WPDOCS\Ordinances\Gateway.wpd Ordinance No. Zone Change 2001-105 - "The Gateway" Adopted: February 5, 2002 EXHIBIT "A" us N M t6 O� M N F- M u7 O� M N i .I 035 G:\WPDOCS\Ordinances\Gateway.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING OF DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR TOURIST COMMERCIAL USES, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND A NEIGHBORHOOD PARK GENERALLY BOUNDED BY MILES AVENUE ON THE NORTH, COACHELLA VALLEY STORMWATER CHANNEL ON THE SOUTH, WASHINGTON STREET ON THE WEST AND INCO CENTURY SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION ON THE EAST CASE NO.: SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5th day of February, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Specific Plan 2001-055, to allow the development of resort uses, Medium Density Residential and a neighborhood park generally located at the southeast corner of Miles Avenue and Washington Street, north of the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 22nd day of January, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Specific Plan 2001-055, to allow the development of resort uses, Medium Density Residential and a neighborhood park generally located at the southeast corner of Miles Avenue and Washington Street, north of the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, and more particularly described as: APNs 604-04-12, 604-04-13, 604-04-23 and 604-04-37 WHEREAS, said Specific Plan has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-63), in that an Environmental Assessment (EA 2001-436) was prepared for Specific Plan 2001-055 and found that although the proposed project will have environmental impacts, all impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings of approval to justify approving Specific Plan 2001-055: 1 . The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan in that the parcels have been designated for Tourist Commercial, Medium Density Residential and Park and Recreation on the Land 3 Use Map, as amended with General Plan Amendment 2001-083. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\GatewaySP.wpd `� City Council Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 2001-055 - The Gateway Adopted: February 5, 2002 2. This Specific Plan will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare in that the commercial development will occur at a major intersection and medium density residential will provide buffering to the residential land uses to the east. 3. That the Specific Plan is compatible with the existing and anticipated area development in that the project is to be located on land designated as Tourist Commercial and Medium Density Residential. 4. That the project will be provided with adequate utilities and public services to ensure public health and safety. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby confirm the conclusion ,that Environmental Assessment 2001-436 assessed the environmental concerns of the Specific Plan; and, 3. That it does approve Specific Plan 2001-055 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 5th day of February, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 30 1 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\GatewaySP.wpd 037 City Council Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 2001-055 - The Gateway Adopted: February 5, 2002 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\GatewaySP.wpd _ 0 v 3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 - "THE GATEWAY" FEBRUARY 5, 2002 The Specific Plan document shall be modified to include the following: 1. Page 5. Land Use Area I. Tourist Commercial Development Standards. Add a Minimum 30 foot building setback from Miles Avenue and Washington Street. 1. Page 6. Land Use Area II. Detached Dwelling Units. The development standards shall be changed in that the minimum livable floor area for single family detached excluding the garage shall be 1,400 square feet with 15% at 1,200 square feet. 3. Page 7. Land Use Area II. Attached Dwelling Units/Resort Casitas. The minimum livable floor area shall be 1,400 square feet with 30% allowed to be under 1,400 square feet. 4. Page 7. Land Use Area 111. B. Permitted Uses. Add a #5. Parking Lot. 5. Page 14. Off -Site Improvements. The Public Works Department shall consider the option to install a left turn pocket for Seeley Drive southbound. 30 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\GatewaySP.wpd ATTACHMENT #2 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 11. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-014, reco ending Certification of an Addendum to Environmental I ct Report #232, subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kir Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None,SENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 12. It was moved and seconded b Commissioners Robbins/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission esolution 2002-015, recommending approval of General Plan mendment 2001-080, subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Co issioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman bels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 13. It was mo ed and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt PlanninV Commission Resolution 2002-016, recommending appro al of Zone Change 2001-103, subject to the findings. ROLL C L: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and 7Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. B. Environmental Assessment 2001-436, General Plan Amendment 2001- 083. and Zone Chance 2001-105 and Specific Plan 2001-055 - "The Gateway"; a request of the City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency for review of a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from High Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and Tourist Commercial and review of development standards and design guidelines for Tourist Commercial uses including hotels, and retail -related uses, and residential development including townhouses and single family residences for the property located at the southeast corner of Miles Avenue and Washington Street. 1 . Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Mr. Frank Spevacek, Rosenow Spevacek Group, Redevelopment Consultant for the City, presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3 10 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-22-02.wpd 4 0 4 '� Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Kirk stated that given the original purpose and land use of the site, what is the impact of the City's ability to meet the regional fair share of housing needs. Staff stated it will both reduce the City's ability to meet that in terms of the fair share housing for the City's General Plan as well as the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) inclusionary housing requirements. However, staff found that as noise impacts that would be generated by the Washington Street and Miles Avenue roadway activities was studies, to put residential units at this location would provide more impacts to residence than it would to occupants of hotel/commercial uses. From an environmental compatibility standpoint, it makes more sense to have commercial abut those areas. In addition, the RDA will be looking at revising its housing strategies to perhaps include purchasing additional properties to meet both the City's affordable housing needs as well as the Agency. Commissioner Kirk asked if the City and Agency were close to meeting its inclusionary housing requirements. In terms of the Agency's requirements, we are one third of the way there. 3. Commissioner Kirk asked if there was a copy of the visual simulation available as referred to in the Environmental Assessment. Also, on Page 13 of the Specific Plan there is an Energy Efficiency Plan requirement; is this the first time the City has done this and if so, who will monitor this? Planning Manager Christine di lorio stated the City is trying to see what a potential developer could provided in order to encourage these measures. The Planning Commission will review the site development permit for energy provisions. Commissioner Kirk asked if there were other guidelines than those contained in the Zoning Code. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated that depending on how this project develops, staff could create the guidelines and require them of the developers in the future. Staff will try to obtain whatever they can for a model in order to establish these types of guidelines. The Specific Plan is not specific in order to allow the developer the opportunity to inform staff of what is possible. Commissioner Kirk asked if the requirements should be in place before hiring a develop. Staff stated the City wanted as much latitude as possible to help create the standards. Discussion followed. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-22-02.wpd 5 041. Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 4. Commissioner Tyler stated he was concerned that some of the City's established standards were being reduced to accommodate this Specific Plan, such as building setbacks. The minimum livable floor area is being reduced to 1,200 square feet. The casitas units location should be specified. He also has several concerns about the off -site improvements that are mentioned in the Environmental Assessment. He asked why the City is asking the developer to install a signal at Seeley Drive and Miles Avenue. It should be required to be at the first phase of development or when it meets warrants; it should be defined better. He suggested adding a left turn pocket to Seeley Drive where it enters Miles Avenue from the Acacia development. 4. Commissioner Butler questioned why staff was lowering the square footage for the houses to less than what the City's requirement are at 1,400 square feet. He too is concerned with the reduction in setbacks. Planning Manager Christine di lorio stated that by allowing the reduction in setbacks on the corners, it will allow the building to be pushed up to the corner instead of having a parking lot. Staff gave examples. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated that as it relates to unit sizes, there are two sizes. This project is envisioned to have affordable units and market units. Staff is wanting to give flexibility to the design. These are minimum sizes, the site development permit will provide more when it is reviewed in the future. Commissioner Butler asked if there was a limit to the number of smaller houses that could be constructed at this time. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated there are only 90 units to be built in this site. Staff is requesting the flexibility to give a potential developer options at this time. The intent is to have a variety of housing units sizes. 5. Commissioner Kirk asked if staff had a percentage of affordable units they were proposing to develop. City Consultant Frank Spevacek stated that at time, it is the Agency's goal to have a minimum of 15% to 20% affordable units. It becomes a matter of economics as to how much the Agency elects to subsidize the units in order to reach the affordable level. At this point in terms of housing production goals, it is looking to be 15% to 20%. When the City tried to make the Miraflores 100% affordable at moderate, we ran into market condition problems, therefore, we went to 50% affordable and 50% market rate. Commissioner Kirk asked if staff needed to reduce building area in order to have the G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-22-02.wpd 6 042 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 affordable units. Mr. Spevacek stated that not so much in reducing the building area, but what they found out with the Miraflores project was that the 1,200 to 1,300 square foot units were the most popular. What staff is trying to accomplish is to raise the development standards by allowing the flexibility of the development by permitting the 1,200 square foot units as well as the larger units and broker with the developer the unit mix. Commissioner Kirk asked about the 1,000 square foot attached units. Mr. Spevacek stated the object was to have a townhome type project with two stories, two bedrooms to buffer the residential from Miles Avenue and commercial development. 6. Commissioner Kirk asked if the reduction in size was to meet the affordable standards. Staff stated that what the City found out in the Miraflores project was that the market was for the 1,200 square foot house. Staff want to have the flexibility to broker the size with the developer. Commissioner Kirk asked about the attached units. Staff indicated that a townhome type project is proposed that would buffer the single family from both Miles Avenue and the commercial development. Commissioner Kirk asked what staff position has been with potential developers in regard to reducing the livable floor area. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the project at Jefferson Street and Fred Waring Drive has approved units smaller units approved on 5000 square feet lots. However, the developer will be changing the size, but at that time they still wanted flexibility. 7. Commissioner Robbins asked why the Specific Plan does not contain the objectives as explained by staff. Why is it not a part of the document. Staff stated it is a City Redevelopment Agency project and it depends on what the Agency wants to do in regard to assistance. Commissioner Robbins ask why, on a piece of property next to the Storm Channel, is the City tying up several acres of land in retention basin when it is not required. Staff stated it is temporary in nature. Commissioner Robbins stated it is shown on the plan as retention basin. Planning Manager Christine di lorio stated it is a phased program where the hotel is constructed and the retention is in the residential area and when the residential is built it is removed. Mr. Doug Franklin, Keith Companies, engineer for the project, stated the park is one foot deep and permanent and the other is temporary. Staff stated that 31 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-22-02.wpd 7 u 4 3 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 on Page 15, Section 3.3.1 it speaks to temporary measures and temporarily directing surface runoff and explains what is to be done permanently. 8. Commissioner Kirk asked the advantage of doing it temporary with the storm channel so close. Mr. Franklin stated it is to accommodate the runoff on a temporary basis and then divert to the Channel. The park is part of the permanent system. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the intention is to build the commercial portion first and then the residential and connect into the Channel at that time. 9. Commissioner Tyler stated he had a concern on Page 8 of the Specific Plan where it stated "within the site Seeley Drive will be lined by entrances to the residential component." Mr. Frank Spevacek explained that Exhibit "B" of the Specific Plan is just an illustrative site plan for design to identify how much building mass the site can be accommodated given the development standards. He went on to explain the openings and the objective for the area. 10. Commissioner Butler asked if Seeley Drive would come from Miles Avenue, go through the project and exit onto Washington Street. Staff stated it would. 1 1 . Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment on this item. Ms. Margaret Taylor, 78-615 Alden Circle stated her concern was in regard to the traffic onto Seeley Drive. Her home faces onto Seeley Drive and kids are always playing on the street. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated Seeley Drive is intended to have a signal and will be a controlled access. Washington Street will be a right in and right out and maybe a left in. It is not intended to be a fast moving thoroughfare. It will have a traffic circle to slow the traffic down. Ms. Taylor asked if there would be some direction given to keep the tourists from driving down this street. Staff stated they are trying to mitigate it and achieve least amount of traffic. 12. Ms. Helga Paul, 45-395 Coldbrook Lane, stated she was concerned as this development is right next to her house. She asked if Seeley Drive would be the only street into this development. Staff stated yes. There may be an opportunity to have a right in and right out between Seeley Drive and Washington 044 �3 4i G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-22-02.wpd 8 v 4 -` Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 Street into the hotel. Ms. Paul stated she was also concerned with the height of the project. Staff noted that with the grading of the property there will be a one foot differential between the City's project and the single family homes. 13. There being no further public participation, the public comment portion of the public hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 14. Commissioner Tyler stated he has mixed feelings in regard to Exhibit "6". He would like to see a southbound lane on Seeley Drive. 15. Commissioner Kirk stated this is a nonspecific specific plan that allow as much flexibility as possible at this time. He applauded staff on the energy efficiency plans, but was still concerned with the setbacks and questioned why the City should give itself a greater break than it would give a developer. He would not want every unit to have the ability to be 1,200 square feet; maybe 20% 16. Commissioner Robbins stated there is no place to park at the park and there should be some off street parking for the use. He agrees with Commissioner Kirk that there should be a limit placed on the number of smaller units. He also agrees with reducing the setbacks for the corners, but there also needs to be some limit in the middle of the block where the changes do not apply. There should be a limit of 100 feet from an intersection as a suggestion. Also, concerned with Seeley Drive becoming a through street. There does not need to be a full turn at Miles Avenue and Seeley Drive. Right in and out and a left turn in off of Miles Avenue would be sufficient. The problem is to get a left turn onto Washington Street. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the possibility of getting a full turning movement on Washington Street is slim due to the angle and visibility. The reason for the full movement on Miles Avenue is for the hotel as a full turn movement will be allowed on Washington Street. Discussion followed. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated full turn movements are a premium. The one at Seeley Drive has a full turn and will match up. The concern is the cut -through traffic of northbound traffic leaving this site and going across Miles Avenue G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-22-02.wpd 9 04J Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 and then through the neighborhood. If this becomes a real problem, there are things the City can do to control this. The occasional tourists who travel through the neighborhood can be a concern and could be handled at a later time. 17. Commissioner Kirk asked about the buildings in the setback area. City Consultant Frank Spevacek stated there are two factors. First, the City has a requirement that there can be no building higher than 22 feet within 150 feet of an Arterial street. This would limit the building height to one story. Second, looking at the potential noise impacts and building limits, there will need to be a combination of berming and setbacks. Third, the entry at Miles Avenue and Washington Street is difficult to get into and have good circulation from a physical standpoint and to make it a major entry statement to the City. To make this happen when you deal with the setback, height limits, and circulation to get to this point and add the entry points, staff came up with this design as it would accommodate with the setback and allowed for rational circulation to that point, and facilitated the landscape feature at this intersection. In regard to parking, there will be a landscaped berm to buffer along the streets; an adequate setback of a potential three story building from Miles Avenue; and the potential single family next door. The thought was instead of loading the parking off Seeley Drive and moving the building back to Miles Avenue, the parking was placed between the berm that would hide it and the hotel structure. 18. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-017, recommending Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-436, subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 19. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-018, recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 2001-083, subject to the findings. ') 31 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-22-02.wpd 10 V 4 0 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 20. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-019, recommending approval of Zone Change 2001-105, subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 9. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-020, recommending approval of Specific Plan 2001-055, subject to the findings as submitted/amended: Condition #1: Page 5. Land Use Area I. Tourist Commercial Development Standards. Add a Minimum 30 foot building setback from Miles Avenue and Washington Street. Condition #2: Page 6. Land Use Area II. Detached Dwelling Units. The development standards shall be changed in that the minimum livable floor area for single family detached excluding the garage shall be 1,400 square feet with 15 % at 1,200 square feet. Condition #3: Page 7. Land Use Area II. Attached Dwelling Units/Resort Casitas. The minimum livable floor area shall be 1,400 square feet with 30% allowed to be under 1,400 square feet. Condition #4: Page 7. Land Use Area III. B. Permitted Uses. Add a #5. Parking Lot. Condition #5: Page 14. Off -Site Improvements. The Public Works Department shall consider the option to install a left turn pocket for Seeley Drive southbound. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 31.}t G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-22-02.wpd 11 047 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 C. Site Development Permit 2001-724; a request of Family YMCA of the Desert for review of architectural plans for a 2,626 square foot addition to the YMCA La Quinta Preschool, located at 49-955 Park Avenue. 1 . Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner asked if the trees would be eplanted. Staff stated it was up to the architect. 3. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. John Walling, representing the applicant, gave a presentation on the project. He stated the trees stated it depends on whether or not they could be moved and saved. 4. Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment. There being no further public comment, the public participation portion of the hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-021, approving Site Development Permit 2001- 727, subject to the findings and conditions as submitted. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Chairman Abels recessed the meting at 8:20 p.m. and reconvened at 8:26 p.m. D. Site Development Permh 2001-725; a request of Carlos Gomez for Von's Shopping Center for revi w of development plans to increase the size of the Von's Supermarket fro 36,827 square feet to 47,198 square feet for the property located at 7 -271 through 78-297 Highway 1 1 1, within Plaza La Quinta. 1 . Chairman Abels opened the nablic hearing and asked for the staff 310 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1 -22-02.wpd 12 043 T 0 0 it!t 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 5, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Continued Public Hearing to Certify a Mitigated PUBLIC HEARING:y2 Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for on Environmental Assessment 2001-433, General Plan Amendment 2001-082 to Change Certain Standards Relating to Intersection Spacing in the General Plan; Specific Plan 2001-054 Establishing Development Standards and Design Guidelines for the Construction of a 120,700 Square Foot Neighborhood Shopping Center; Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 to Allow a Gasoline Service Station and Car Wash at the Northwest Corner of the Site; and Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 for the Supermarket, Bank, and Drugstore Buildings to be Located at the Southeast Corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street. Applicant: RLF Development RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council Certifying a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-433. 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment 2001-082. 3. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 2001-054. 4. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Conditional Use Permit 2001- 066. 5. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 . FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. 3 G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\Bartlett.wpd CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The City Council at its January 15, 2002 meeting reviewed and continued the proposal to this meeting. The project site is located at the southeast corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street and is generally vacant. It is bordered by the All American Canal on the south, Jefferson Street on the west, Avenue 52 on the north, and vacant desert lands designated for Low Density Residential units on the east. The site is designated for Neighborhood Commercial on both the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance maps. Project Request In addition to the Environmental Assessment, the following applications have been filed: 1 . A General Plan Amendment to change the City's standards for intersection spacing on Major Arterials. The current standard is 2,600 feet for Major Arterials. The proposed General Plan Amendment would reduce this standard to 1,060 feet for commercial frontage on Major Arterials. 2. A Specific Plan (Attachment 1) to establish development standards and design guidelines for the construction of a neighborhood shopping center, including a supermarket with attached shops on each side, a drug store with drive -through, seven building pads (including drive-throughs at Pads A, D and E, and the Coffee building), and a gasoline service station and car wash. 3. A Conditional Use Permit for the gasoline service station use. 4. A Site Development Permit for the building elevations, site and landscaping plans for the supermarket, drug store and bank (Pad D) buildings (Attachment 2). Separate Site Development Permits will be required for the service station, coffee building, and pads A, B, C, E and F. The Site Development Permit details the architectural style of the supermarket, drug store and bank buildings, and the types of materials which will be utilized. The variations to the City's zoning standards are discussed individually below. s G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\Bartlett.wpd J 0 0 � Project Description The proposed project would allow up to 120,700 square feet of retail commercial development on the project site. The proposed uses include a supermarket, attached small retail stores, a drugstore with drive -through, bank building with drive -through, gas station and car wash, two fast food restaurant pads with drive-throughs, a coffee store pad with drive -through, and three miscellaneous retail sites (pads B, C and F). The architectural style of the proposed project is generally "Southwestern." The buildings are proposed to be stucco, with flat roofs and large pillars supporting a shaded walkway area. Access is proposed from both Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street. Two access points are proposed on Avenue 52: one at the mid -point of the property line allowing right -in, right -out and left -in movements, and one at the eastern property line allowing right turn movements only. Three access points are proposed on Jefferson Street: the southerly access (next to Pad D) is proposed to be signalized, and provide full turn movements at a signalized intersection, if the General Plan Amendment described above is approved. The center access point, located next to Pad C, will allow right -in, right -out access only. The northerly access point, next to Pad B, will be right -in, right - out only. The landscape plan is limited to Palo Verde, Mesquite and Acacia for trees, and a mix of drought tolerant shrubs and succulents for ground cover. Little turf appears to be proposed. The primary area of concern in the landscaping plan is the retention area, which is proposed to be landscaped only on the perimeter, leaving the slopes and bottom in vacant desert. A condition of approval has been added which requires the redesign of the retention basin landscaping, to include some type of soil stabilization. General Plan Amendment Analysis The current standard within the General Plan Circulation Table is 2,600 feet for Major Arterials. The proposed General Plan Amendment would maintain the residential standard on Major Arterials at 2,600 feet, but reduce this standard to 1,060 feet for commercial frontage on Major Arterials. The standard revision corresponds to that proposed in the Draft General Plan currently under review. In order to analyze this potential change in General Plan standards, an analysis was commissioned'. The analysis found that the proposed change would generally not cause a hazard, although it should not be implemented at the following locations: Letter dated November 30, 2001, John Kain of Urban Crossroads, Inc. G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\Bartlett.wpd - 0 1. Washington Street from Highway 1 1 1 to Avenue 48. 2. Highway 1 1 1 west of Washington Street. 3. Washington Street from Country Club Drive to 1-10 (this area is now being considered for deletion from the Plan, but was in the original planning area). The analysis found that two issues are critical in assuring that the reductions proposed do not pose a hazard, or affect roadway capacity: 1 . The ability of the City Engineer to review individual requests to assure safe operation and intersection requirements; and 2. That traffic signal operations in areas where minimum intersection spacing occurs on Major Arterials be interconnected and optimized, and intersection geometrics be determined based upon City level of service criteria. Assuming these items are implemented, the analysis found that the change in standard would not pose a public health and safety hazard, and would not impact roadway capacity. Further, the change is supported in the existing General Plan in Policy 3-1.1.1, Goal 3-2, Policy 3-2.1.9, Goal 3-3, Policies 3-3.1.1, 3-3.1.2 and 3-3.1.4, which all support the design of an efficient and safe roadway system. The General Plan also clearly allows for ongoing review and revision of standards, as new information becomes available, or conditions change in the City. The General Plan Amendment can therefore be found consistent with the adopted General Plan. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed these applications at its regularly scheduled meeting of December 11, 2001 (Attachment 3). A number of issues were discussed with regards to staff's recommendations. The Planning Commission recommended approval of all applications subject to Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The findings necessary to approve this request can be made, and are included in the attached Resolutions. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council Certifying a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-433; Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment 2001-082; Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 2001-054; .1.., G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\Bartlett.wpd 004 Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Conditional Use Permit 2001- 066; and Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Site Development Permit 2001-71 1; or 2. Do not adopt the above Resolutions; or 3. Remand the applications to the Planning Commission for further consideration; or 4. Continue the request and provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Cary He man mm unity Development Director Approved for submissi n y• Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Specific Plan Document (previously distributed) 2. Elevations for drug and grocery store (previously distributed) 3. Planning Commission Minutes of December 11, 2001 (previously distributed) 323 G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\Bartlett.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-437 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-082, SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-066 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-433 APPLICANT: RLF DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 15th day of January, 2002, and the 51h day of February, 2002 hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider Environmental Assessment 2001-433 for General Plan Amendment 2001-082, Specific Plan 2001-054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 and Site Development Permit 2001 -711 located at the southeast corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 11 th day of December, 2001 hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2001-433 prepared for General Plan Amendment 2001- 082, Specific Plan 2001-054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 and Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 located at the southeast corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street, more particularly described as follows: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 760-290-005 WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study (EA 2001-433) and has determined that although the proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-082, Specific Plan 2001-054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 and Site Development Permit 2001 -711 could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because appropriate mitigation measures were made a part of the assessment and included in the Conditions of Approval for General Plan Amendment 2001-082, Specific Plan 2001-054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 and Site Development Permit 2001-711 and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed, and, G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettEA.WPD fy . r :..[ 006 City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-433 RLF Development Adopted: February 5, 2002 WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify certification of said Environmental Assessment: 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-082, Specific Plan 2001-054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 and Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2001-433. 2. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-082, Specific Plan 2001-054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 and Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 4. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-082, Specific Plan 2001-054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 and Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 do not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. 5. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-082, Specific Plan 2001-054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 and Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. 6. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-082, Specific Plan 2001-054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 and Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettEA.WPD 007 U . City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-433 RLF Development Adopted: February 5, 2002 7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 8. The Planning Commission has considered the Environmental Assessment 2001- 433 and the Environmental Assessment reflects the independent judgement of the City. 9. The City has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 10. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby certify Environmental Assessment 2001-433 for the reasons set forth in the Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum on file in the Community Development Department. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 5th day of February 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 3') O G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettEA.WPD 003 J City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-433 RLF Development Adopted: February 5, 2002 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 39" tii 009 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettEA.WPD Environmental Checklist Form Planning Commission Resolution 2001-150 City Council Resolution 2002- 1. Project Title: General Plan Amendment 2001-082, Specific Plan 2001- 054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066, Site Development Permit 2001-71 1. Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center. 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Christine di lorio, 760-777-7125 4. Project Location: Southeast corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: RLF Development 77043 Iroquois Drive Indian Wells, CA 92210 6. General Plan Designation: Neighborhood Commercial 7. Zoning: Neighborhood Commercial 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) General Plan Amendment to shorten the distance between signalized intersections on Major. Specific Plan to establish development standards and design guidelines for the construction of a neighborhood shopping center on 15.15 acres, including supermarket, drug store and seven ancillary pads. Conditional Use Permit for the location of a service station at the northwest corner of the property. Site Development Permit for the development plans of the supermarket, drug store and bank building. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings. North: Avenue 52, Low Density Residential South: All -American Canal, Low Density Residential West: Jefferson Street, Low Density Residential East: Low Density Residential 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) 3� v Not applicable (� i� G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletEACkIst.WPD V 1 v Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology and Soils Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared LE I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. 11WL )c 020/0/ Signature Date Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletEACkIst.WPD 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analysis are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The analysis of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletEACkIst.WPD 1 3 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: AESTHETICS: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (General Plan Exhibit CIR-5) b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (General Plan EIR, page 5-12 ff.) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials) II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES:. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Dept. Of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29, 5-32) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (Aerial photographs) III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Project Description) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Project Description) Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact X X X X K/_ X X X X X 33. 013 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletEACkIst.WPD IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment, Exhibit 5-1) b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) c) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) Either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (La Quinta Municipal Code; General Plan) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-5) V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? ("Cultural Resources Assessment of a 15 acre Parcel...," Archaeological Associates, July 2001) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resources (i.e., an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? ("Cultural Resources Assessment of a 15 acre Parcel...," Archaeological Associates, July 2001) c) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? (Lakebed Delineation Map) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ("Cultural Resources Assessment of a 15 acre Parcel...," Archaeological Associates, July 2001) VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: X X X X X X M X M 339 U14 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartietEACkIst.WPD i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.2-3, page 4-35) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6-2, page 6-7) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6-2, page 6-7) iv) Landslides? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6-2, page 6-7) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6-2, page 6-7) c) Be located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on - or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? ("Geotechnical Investigation Proposed 7 Lot Residential Subdivision...," Sladden Engineering, August 2001) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-32) VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Application Materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Application Materials) c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Application Materials) d) Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Riverside County Hazardous Materials Listing) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip; would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 6-11) X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3f 0 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletEACkIst.WPD - 015 h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildlands fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) X VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-26, 6-27) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (General Plan EIR, page 4-57 ff.) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off - site? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater, drainage systems to control? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) f) Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-13) g) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-13) IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Specific Plan Project Description) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purposes of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Master Environmental Assessment 2-11) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5- 5) X. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29) X X X X X X X X X F`/ " 3,3 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletEACkIst.WPD XI. NOISE: Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6- 4, page 6-17) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6- 4, page 6-17) c) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6-4, page 6-17) d) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Master Environmental Assessment) e) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive levels? (General Plan map) XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (General Plan, page 2-14) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff. ) Police protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff. ) Schools? (General Plan MEA, page 4-9 ff. ) Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA, page 4-14 ff. ) X M X X X X X X X X X r 01 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletEACkIst.WPD 8 XIV. RECREATION: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application Materials) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application Materials) XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff.) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff.) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff.) d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff.) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Application Materials) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Application Materials) g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Application Materials) XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24 b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24 ) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, page 4-27) d) Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, page 4-20) e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, page 4-20) X X X X X X X X X X " X 33 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletEACkIst.WPD f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (General Plan MEA, page 4-28) XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVIII EARLIER Analysis. X F� X Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. No earlier analysis were used in this review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. See attached Addendum. SOURCES: Master Environmental Assessment, City of La Quinta General Plan 1992. SCAQMD CEQA Handbook. General Plan, City of La Quinta, 1992. City of La Quinta Municipal Code Cultural Resources Assessment of a 15 Acre Parcel Located Southeast of the Intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 52..., Archaeological Associates, July 2001. 33 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletEACkIst.WPD 10 U19 Addendum for Environmental Assessment 2001-433 Planning Commission Resolution 2001-149 City Council Resolution 2002- III. a) The proposed project will generate air pollution primarily from the operation of motor vehicles. The 120,700 square feet of commercial development could generate approximately 5,180 trips per day'. Based on this trip generation, the project at buildout will generate the following pollutants. Running Exhaust Emissions (pounds/day) PM10 PM10 PM10 CO ROC NOx Exhaust Brakes Tires 50 mph 133.79 5.15 27.44 -- 0.57 0.57 Daily Threshold* 550 75 100 150 Based on 5,180 trips/day and average trip length of 5 miles, using EMFAC7G Model provided by California Air Resources Board. Assumes catalytic light autos at 75°F. * Operational thresholds provided by SCAQMD for assistance in determining the significance of a project and the need for an EIR. As demonstrated in the Table above, the proposed project will not exceed any threshold for the generation of moving emissions, as established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District in determining the need for an EIR. The impacts to air quality relating to chemical pollution are not expected to be significant. III . c) The Coachella Valley is a non -attainment area for PM10 (particulate matter of 10 microns or smaller). The construction of the proposed project has the potential to generate dust, which could contribute to the PM 10 problem in the area. In order to control PM10, the City has imposed standards and requirements on development to control dust. The applicant will be required to submit such a plan prior to initiation of any earth moving activity at the site. In addition, the potential impacts associated with PM 10 can be mitigated by the mitigation measures below. 1. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. Institute of Transportation Engineers, "Trip Generation, 6th Edition." Rate calculated for shopping centers, at 42.92 trips per day. 020 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartlettAdd.WPD 1 2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation. 3. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. Cut and fill quantities will be balanced on site. 5. Any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. 6. Watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on -going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. 7. All disturbed areas shall be treated to prevent erosion until the site is constructed upon. Pad sites which are to remain undeveloped shall be seeded with either a desert wildflower mix or grass seed, or chemical stabilizer. 8. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. Perimeter landscaping on Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street, and the retention basin landscaping shall be completed with the first phase of development. 9. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean up of construction -related dirt on approach routes to the site. 10. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. 11 All buildings on the project site shall conform to energy use guidelines in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, the impacts to air quality from buildout will not be significant. V. b) A cultural resource survey was conducted for the subject property2. The assessment found no surficial deposits, but identified the area as a high wind zone which can regularly cover or uncover artifacts. As a result, the report 2 33,E " Cultural Resources Assessment of 15 Acre Property...,"" Archaeological Associates, July 2001. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartlettAdd.WPD 2 0 2 JI recommends the imposition of the following mitigation measure: 1. A qualified archaeological monitor shall be present during all earth moving and grading activities. The monitor shall be empowered to stop or redirect activities on the site should a resource be identified. A final report shall be filed with the Community Development Department prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any building on the project site. VI. a) i) & ii) The proposed project lies in a Zone III groundshaking zone. The property, as with the rest of the City, will be subject to significant ground movement in the event of a major earthquake. Structures on the site will be required to meet the City's standards for construction, which include Uniform Building Code requirements for seismic zones. The City Engineer will require the preparation of site -specific geotechnical analysis in conjunction with the submittal of grading plans (please see below). This requirement will ensure that impacts from ground shaking are reduced to a less than significant level. V1. b) The subject property is subject to soil erosion due to wind. The City will implement requirements for a PM 10 management plan, and additional mitigation measures have been included in the Air Quality discussion above. These mitigation measures will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. VIII. b) Domestic water is provided by the Coachella Valley Water District, which extracts groundwater from a number of wells in the Lower Thermal sub -basin. The development of the project site will require some domestic water, although as a commercial development the use of water on the site will be much less than residential development. The project proponent will be required to implement the City's standards for water conserving plumbing fixtures and on - site retention, which both aid in reducing the potential impacts associated with groundwater. The proposed project will also meet the requirements of the City's water -conserving landscaping ordinance. These standards will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. VIII. c)-d) The City requires that all construction projects retain the 100 year 24 hour storm on -site. This will control the amount of runoff which exits the site during a storm. The project's drainage plan will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of grading permits. The Specific Plan includes a provision for the use of the site's retention basin as a plant nursery. This use will significantly reduce the capacity of the retention basin, will potentially negate ate the standards imposed by the City, and 3,� 9 {� 11 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartlettAdd.WPD 3 U 2 �w could pose a significant hazard to adjoining property in the event of a flooding hazard. In order to mitigate this impact, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1. The retention basin shall be used for passive open space only, and shall not be utilized as a plant nursery at any time. XI. a) The current noise environment at the project site ranges from 50 to 60 dBA CNEL, with higher levels in areas close to both Avenue 52 and Jefferson. The proposed project will not be a sensitive receptor, but will be located next to future sensitive receptors to the east. The proposed project will generate noise from compactors, trash enclosures and other stationary sources, in addition to the traffic noise which will occur on -site. The proposed site plan shows that the loading docks, compactors and trash enclosures will be located closest to the residential lands to the east. This potentially could impact residential units to the east in the future. Therefore, the following mitigation measures will be implemented: 1. An 8 foot wall shall be constructed along the entire length on the eastern property line. The wall shall be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permits for any building on the site. 2. All deliveries occurring on the east side of the proposed market and Shops A and B shall occur between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m., Monday through Saturday. No deliveries shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. No loudspeaker system (such as those operated for drive -through windows) shall be permitted at Pad F. 4. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent shall submit to the Community Development Department for review and approval, a noise analysis which demonstrates that the noise levels east of the property line shall meet City standards after construction of the supermarket building, Shops A and B, and Pad F. XI. c) Noise levels will also be affected by construction activities on the site. Should the residential development be occupied prior to, or during the construction of the shopping center, the residents could be adversely impacted by construction noise. In order to mitigate these impacts, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1. All internal combustion equipment operating within 500 feet of any occupied residential unit shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers. 2. All stationaryconstruction equipment (e.g. generators and compressors) 3 4 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartlettAdd.WPD 4 � 0 2 3 shall be located as far as practical from adjacent, occupied residential units. 3. Construction activities shall be limited to the hours prescribed in the La Quinta Municipal Code. These mitigation measures will reduce the potential impacts associated with noise at the subject property to a less than significant level. XIII. a) The proposed development will have a direct impact on public services and will be served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, acting under City contract. Site development will generate property tax and sales taxes which will offset the costs of added police and fire services. XV. a) XV. d) The project area will be required to pay the mandated school fees as development occurs. These fees mitigate the students generated, and offset the impacts to schools. The collection of property tax, and the generation of sales tax will generate revenues to the City to offset the added costs associated with the provision of municipal services. The project will be required to participate in the City's Impact Fee Program, which helps to offset roadway improvement costs. Site development is not expected to have a significant impact on municipal services or facilities. The proposed project site is designated for neighborhood commercial development, and as such was analysed in the City's General Plan EIR. The potential impacts associated with traffic generation from the site have been addressed in that document, and incorporated into the City's roadway standards, which the proposed project will be required to implement. The City has also initiated an Impact Fee Program, designed to offset improvement costs on City roadways. The project will be required to participate in this program. These requirements will serve to reduce the potential impacts associated with traffic generation at the site to a less than significant level. The proposed project includes the amendment of the City's General Plan to reduce the separation required on Major Arterials for intersection spacing. The current standard is 2,600 feet for Major Arterials. The proposed General Plan Amendment would reduce this standard to 1,060 feet for commercial frontage on Major Arterials. In order to analyze this potential change in General Plan G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartlettAdd.WPD 5 3 standards, an analysis was commissioned'. The analysis found that the proposed change would not cause a hazard at the project location, although it should not be implemented along certain segments of Washington Street, and on Highway 1 1 1 west of Washington Street. At the project site, the standard is determined to be safe, assuming the following mitigation measure is implemented: 1 . Traffic signal operations in areas where minimum intersection spacing occurs on Major and Primary Arterials shall be interconnected and optimized, and intersection geometrics shall be determined based upon City level of service criteria. The implementation of this mitigation measure at the project site will reduce potential impacts associated with design features to a less than significant level. Letter dated November 30, 2001, John Kain of Urban Crossroads, Inc. 34-) v G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartlettAdd.WPD 6 �. 0 2 5 O N _O H J O w Cl) z J J V IL E O V V Cl Qa� z W C.)= C) d 0 a LL J � IL.QO O N 0 z C) a O H � J z O r O cc 00 � y V z z a J a 0 O N CO ti O z J L) a a cc W Q O N U N 0 0 z U M M O 0 N 0 z a w A w� �A aU � W ox UU a 'd � � b w Cd bA bA � � o bA � U •� U •4 �O .A �OCd an C � z a Q CA '~ Q U U UCd GA U Q on cr b w • � +'' N U U ram+ cdCd Cd "C Cd a ri 0 OE� 7E m m (A Q 34 V) w U O 0 0- J29 E-•+ A V� ZA aV �w ox UU cl C 0 a w o a a U b� � � cli Cd v) Q, 0 � O U U 'O a oz � �o 0 zz Q a UQ CIS o w bD � rW a b cd Cd to U '> '> 0 0 E-+ A U� ZA Ox UU w U � U a� a G7 � � O a O U 'O a a O� wz as �a o zz ° Oo a ° a w b 0 U c a� a z o ° .> E* � o a ° x u.I 34,)o 0 F A w� �A �W ox VV .d a N F a O o 0 .0 U U � •U U .0 bA z C ° O O '� O �° .� •� v� ) rA M U it ..r ...i ....i Q O z z a W to wo on bn al U U U GQ al G� o a� U co ° s:.- 3 o a o Cd 0 cn C/1 ~ 0' U N cn cdcqs O z ? o rA z z F A U� ZA �W ox VV w V � U U z� U N 'O a a o� wz ao °o 'gin w U z ° 'U o o � c � of a � b �a a o to N U �o w_ •1 � 3400 0 028 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CHANGE TO CERTAIN STANDARDS IN THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN RELATING TO MINIMUM INTERSECTION SPACING ON MAJOR ARTERIALS CASE NO.: GPA 2001-082 APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 15th of January 2002, and 5th day of February, 2002 hold duly noticed Public Hearings for review of a General Plan Amendment to change the minimum intersection spacing on Major Arterials for commercial frontage to 1,060 feet; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 1 1 th day of December, 2001, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for review of a General Plan Amendment, and recommended approval under Resolution 2001- 151; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings approving said General Plan Amendment: 1. Internal General Plan Consistency. The proposed amendment to the Land Use Map would change certain standards for Major Arterials as regards minimum intersection spacing. The proposed amendment was analyzed by a professional traffic engineer, and was determined to be a logical change in General Plan standards. The on -going review of standards in the Circulation Element is supported by the General Plan, as changing conditions warrant. 2. Public Welfare. The proposed amendment will not negatively impact public safety, insofar as the traffic engineer determined that the change will not affect roadway capacity. 3. General Plan Compatibility. The proposed General Plan Amendment will be compatible with the other standards of the Circulation Element, and provides the City with greater flexibility in developing a safe, comprehensive circulation system. 4. Property Suitability. The proposed Amendment is City-wide. The City's roadway system and functional classification system support the change. .14 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettGPA.WPD Id 029 City Council Resolution 2002-_ General Plan Amendment 2001-082 City of La Quinta Adopted: February 5, 2002 5. Change in Circumstances. The continued development of the City requires the continued analysis of the best methods to build out a safe and efficient roadway system, and this Amendment continues to support that development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case. 2. That it does hereby require compliance with those mitigation measures required in Environmental Assessment 2001-433. 3. That it does approve General Plan Amendment 2001-082 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on the 5th day of February 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 3 4 j, G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettGPA.WPD 030 0 Q z Q U) z N 0 cr- Lu U i W QJ Q H Q co fr z Z) V N 00 IO N O O o O N C 0 CN O O LO C o a) ca � QE C_ � c co :3 0 v cad LL 7 a J -p U O >• C >• O t. a, += -o UC7UQ E a) a) -0 U +•j E ca _ Q > _ _ x co a Y o Q O O p LO N c o 00 00 N a c'M M O N O �§ y +, +, 7 , M N O co cn co oC M, O a z x a CD co 0 LO `~ CL O r O N N O>` H N .. p M ('M O ., O O E O Z LA = a) O O C 00 OCIO O O N cn U ' a O Ln O M > O M U `t 'y°. ... O r O O O LO N = a O a) a) c C +; co +� N � � __ O 3 N _> 4-�«- co OLO O O -p 0 ) O '>• O O a) cn cfl = N O U y > •— Q coa p co �. � •.�; p > + N+ pp N O O O C i N cn OU 00 O Ov}' y O a) �U N c N \ O U O co > ' cfl . o N c ai s Q1 4' 0) 'C N T O co ' ` -CC >• O) N co O o C > -0+, CD C co y O O o U) -0 �� O O O 00 p p CD �U a) a� U U o' rn p O O N O ,> co -0 � E ao :.: N O COCD 0 cc 4C -C „ N � > O LL Y) ca O „sl > o-C ` O c> O '0 U C � c C O coU U C o o o O O ` O O C U N O E co O C O co 0 c E c cn a)U co co E 7 U —E U 'a 'a 'E a c �n U c i5 f—H in cn Qa OC C a� U .D 7 O U +r E a) ca in O + 'O U co O co 0 C y Co +r O C -a O C cn a) v y c U U N C o 'p O_ O U � -0 O C 4� 0) o ca Mom• cn Ocn ECG -� CD 0 E a_; `° E a� � ? o = ai CL �— N - E O CO M -C ay, . a: O U O O a) U) .— N y -0 C p \ +r rn ,� LO i/ c LLJ o 4- ,y ai o >, _U O E " }' C Q- U +� E a N :3 E a- m-0 E C E = +r a� Q E `� a) cn Q a. O ca > +' C N � O U 0 � �_ -C > 0 w a ++ O cn 0 " .0 ca m O +-a -a E " ca m � � U OC C E 0 0 O cn 0 O cn 0 U N V V c r°n y x O 4, O Y U E m E 0 C O U a� O CL)ca(D> O .7 L H O oc) 0 U)»cn 3 4� O 0 q* Ln 3J. RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR A NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AVENUE 52 AND JEFFERSON STREET CASE NO.: SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 APPLICANT: RLF DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 15th day of January, 2002, and 51h day of February, 2002 hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider the request of RLF Development for review of a Specific Plan to allow the development of a neighborhood commercial shopping center on 15 acres at the southeast corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street, and more particularly described as: Assessor's Parcel Number: 760-290-005 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 1 1 th day of December, 2001, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for Specific Plan 2001-054, and recommended approval under Resolutions 2001-?; and WHEREAS, the project has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended, Resolution 83-63, in that the Community Development Director has conducted an Initial Study (Environmental Assessment 2001-433) and determined that the proposed project could have an adverse impact on the environment. However, there would not be a significant effect in this case, because appropriate mitigation measures were made a part of the Conditions of Approval for Specific Plan 2001-054, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact will be filed; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings of approval for said Specific Plan 2001-054: Finding Number 1 - Consistency with General Plan/Zoning Code 1. That the proposed Specific Plan 2001-054 is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan in that the parcel has been designated for Neighborhood Commercial on the Land Use Map. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSP01-054.wpd 0 3 !r City Council Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 2001-054 - RLF Development Adopted: February 5, 2002 2. The proposed Specific Plan is compatible with the City's zoning ordinance in that it provides standards for the proposed land uses, and implements requirements for Conditional Use Permits, as stipulated. Findina Number 2 - Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act 1 . A Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared by the Community Development Department as required by the California Environmental Quality Act statutes. The assessment concludes that the project will not significantly affect the environment, provided Mitigation Monitoring is completed (EA 2001-433). Finding Number 3 - Site Design 1. The project, as conditioned, is compatible with the City's standards and existing surrounding development. Conditions of approval have been included to ensure compliance with the City's standards. Finding Number 4 - Site Improvements 1 . The extension of all public services, as required, will provide for the logical expansion of services in the City. 2. All improvements within and adjacent to the proposed project will be constructed to meet City standards and be compatible with surrounding development. 3. The Specific Plan, as conditioned, will not pose a hazard to the public health, welfare or safety. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case. 2. That it does hereby require compliance with those mitigation measures required in EA 2001-433. 3. That it does approve Specific Plan 2001-054 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. 35 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSP01-054.wpd 031 City Council Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 2001-054 - RLF Development Adopted: February 5, 2002 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on the 5th of February, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 352 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSP01-054.wpd v 3 1t CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 1. Upon the City Council's conditional approval of this Specific Plan, the City Clerk shall prepare and record with the Riverside County Recorder, a memorandum noting that the conditions of approval for the development of this property exist and are available for review at the City Hall. 2. The developer agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Specific Plan. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the developer of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary permits and/or clearances from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting the improvement plans for City approval. 4. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. & 13.24.170, La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Quality Resources Control Board's ("SWQRCB") Order No. 99-08- DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs five (5) acres or more of land, or that disturbs less than five (5) acres of land, but which is a part of a construction project that G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 1 35%.A CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 encompasses more than five (5) acres of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this Specific Plan. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020, LQMC): 1. Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2. Temporary Sediment Control. 3. Wind Erosion Control. 4. Tracking Control. 5. Non -Storm Water Management. 6. Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All of applicant's erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off site grading being done in relation to this project. F. All approved project BMPs shall be maintained in their proper working order throughout the course of construction, and until all improvements have been accepted by the City. 5. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). PROPERTY RIGHTS 6. Prior to the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire, or confer, those easements, and other property rights necessary for the construction and/or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services, and for the maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 354 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 2 i CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 7. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 8. Unless the ultimate developed right-of-way can be documented, the public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) - 120-foot ultimate developed right-of-way. 2. Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial) - 1 10-foot ultimate developed right- of-way. 9. Right-of-way geometry for property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawing #805, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 10. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 1 1 . The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public right- of-ways as follows: A. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) - 20-foot from the ROW-P/L. B. Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial) - 20-foot from the ROW-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Parcel Map. 5 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 3 031 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 12. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas shown on the Site Development Plan. 13. The applicant shall vacate all abutter's right -of -access to public streets and properties from all frontages along such public street and properties, excepting those access points shown on the Site Development Plan. 14. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, ingress/egress, or other encroachments will occur. 15. Before the applicant may be permitted to vacate, or abandonment, any existing right-of-way, or access easement, which will diminish the access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall submit a proposed alternate right-of-way or access easement to those properties, or shall submit notarized letters of consent from all affected property owners; the final approval of which rests with the City. 16. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of this Specific Plan and the date of final acceptance of the on and off -site improvements for this Specific Plan, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these conditions of approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 17. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 4 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 A. Off -Site Street Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical The street improvement plans shall include permanent traffic control and separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. B. Off -Site Street Median Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' C. Perimeter Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' D. On -Site Site Development Plan: 1 if = 40' Horizontal E. On -Site Utility Plan: 1 " = 20' Horizontal F. On -Site Landscape Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal G. On -Site Lighting Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. "Site Development" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements; and show the existing street improvements out to at least the center line of the street adjacent to the site. "Site Utility" plans shall normally include all sub -surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to sewer lines, water lines, fire protection and storm drainage systems. "Rough Grading" plans shall include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. 18. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040, LQMC. 19. The City maintains standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City resolution, the applicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes from the City. 35 039 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 5 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 20. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all complete, approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format which can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 21. Prior to the conditional approval of this Specific Plan, or the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 22. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Specific Plan, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28, LQMC. 23. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monuments. 24. When improvements are to be secured through a SIA, and prior to any permits being issued by the City, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on and off -site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution, or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit costs shall be approved by the City Engineer. c:y G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 6 v 4 O CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 At the same time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for the security determination of the SIA, the applicant shall also submit one copy of an 8-1 /2" x 11 IT reduction of each page of the Parcel Map, along with one copy of an 8-1 /2" x 11 IT Vicinity Map. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates for its own on and off -site improvements. Cost estimates for the security of telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements will not be required. Development -wide improvements shall not be agendized for final acceptance by the City Council until the City has received confirmation from the telephone authority that the applicant has met all the requirements for telephone service to all proposed buildings shown on the Site Development Plan. 25. When improvements are phased through an administrative approval (e.g., Phasing Plan, Site Development Permits, etc.), all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the occupancy of any permanent buildings in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The same submittal criteria shall apply to all subsequent phases as required for the first phase submittal. (E.g. detailed cost estimates, 8-1 /2" x 11 IT reductions, etc.) 26. In the event the applicant fails to construct improvements for the development, or fails to, satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, or other phasing method, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 7 41 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 GRADING 27. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 28. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 29. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, and C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on any final map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions submitted with its application for a grading permit. 30. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 31. The applicant shall minimize differences in elevation between the adjoining properties. DRAINAGE 32. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), LQMC, Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03 and the following: G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 8 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 A. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water may be disposed of in a trickling sand filter and leach field approved by the City Engineer. The sand filter and leach field shall be designed to contain surges of up to 3 GP/1,000 sq. ft. of landscape area, and infiltrate 5 g.p.d./1,000 sq. ft. Or nuisance water may be diverted to the landscaped areas. B. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. C. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. D. Pursuant to Section 13.24.120 (D), LQMC, the On -Site retention basin shall be sized to not only accommodate the on -site storm runoff, but also the tributary runoff from the adjacent streets. UTILITIES 33. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.1 10 (Utilities), LQMC. 34. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 35. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 36. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 9 36 11-�- Aj CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 37. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Off -Site Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Properties), LQMC. 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit a Transportation Demand Management (T.M.) Plan in accordance with the City's T.M. Ordinance, Chapter 9.180, LQMC. The applicant shall be responsible for improvements found necessary to mitigate the traffic impacts of this development. 39. Pursuant to Section 9.150.080(A)(8)(b), LQMC, the applicant shall provide 90- foot uninterrupted driveway throats into the parking lot, or alternatively provide a combination of a dedicated right turn deceleration lane and the drive throat that will equal a total of 90-feet. 40. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC, adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, and as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 41. Standard corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #805, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 42. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations which convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue for street sweeping. 43. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial; 1 10' R/W option): Widen south side of street along all frontage adjacent to the Specific Plan boundary. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from 3 �, G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 10 " U 4 t% CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. Other significant new improvements required for installation in, or adjacent, to the subject right of way include: (a) 6-foot wide meandering sidewalk (b) 18-foot wide landscaped median from the roundabout to the east boundary of the Specific Plan The pavement rehabilitation/reconstruction, and landscape median improvements, are eligible for reimbursement from the City's Development Impact Fee fund in accordance with policies established for that program. 2) Jefferson Street (a) Applicant shall construct median openings and turn pockets to accommodate the turning movements authorized by these conditions of approval. (b) Applicant shall install a traffic signal at the project's main entry, located 1 130 ± feet south of Avenue 52 centerline, when warrants are met. Applicant is responsible for 50% of cost to design and install traffic signal if complementing cost share from development on other side of street is available at time signal is required. Applicant shall enter into an improvement agreement and post security for 50% of the cost to design and construct the traffic signal prior to issuance of an onsite grading permit; the security shall remain in effect until the signal is constructed by the applicant or the developer on the other side of the street. If the land on the other side of the street does not have an approved project connecting to the subject intersection, Applicant shall pay 100% of cost to design and install a signal at the resulting "T" intersection. If, however, the Applicant's development trails the progress of the development on the other side of the street and the other development is connecting to the subject intersection, the Applicant is responsible for 50% of the cost as previously 363 stated in this condition. 041 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 11 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 44. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential & Parking Areas 3.0" A.C./4.50" A.B. Collector 4.011/5.0011 Secondary Arterial 4.0"/6.00" Primary Arterial 4.511/6.0011 Major Arterial 5.511/6.50" or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. A. PARKING LOTS 1) The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 45. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Primary Entry (Jefferson Street, 1 130 ± feet S. of the C/L Intersection with Avenue 52): Full turn movement. B. Secondary Entry (Jefferson Street, 810 ± feet S. of the C/L Intersection with Avenue 52): Right turn in, Right turn out. C. Secondary Entry (Jefferson Street, 490 ± feet S. of the C/L Intersection with Avenue 52): Right turn in, Right turn out, Left turn in. D. Primary Entry (Avenue 52, 375 ± feet E. of the C/L Intersection with Jefferson Street): Left & Right turn in, Right turn out. E. Secondary Entry (Avenue 52, 635 ± feet E. of the C/L Intersection with Jefferson Street) : Right turn in, Right turn out. 364 046 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 12 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 This Secondary Entry shall be a shared access drive/road with the adjacent landowner and be centered on the easterly property line. The shared access drive/road layout shall be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In the event the adjacent landowner desires a security gate serving its property, the gate shall be located away from the property line sufficient distance with the following access road design features occurring on the adjacent landowners property: adequate stacking, a rejection turnaround feature, and a separate lane for guests. In the event the adjacent landowner does not reasonably cooperate with the applicant in assisting with the shared access drive/road requirement, the City may allow the applicant to implement an alternative design concept satisfactory to the City Engineer, including but not limited to, elimination of the shared access requirement. Nothing in this condition requires the adjacent landowner to pay for sufficient improvements to implement the shared access requirement in a manner that serves the development proposed by Specific Plan 01-054. However, reasonable cooperation by the adjacent landowner does include granting of reciprocal cross -access easements between the two landowners that facilitate construction of improvements necessary to implement the shared access concept on both properties in a manner that precludes unnecessary reconstruction of the improvements in the future. 46. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 47. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 48. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements. CONSTRUCTION 49. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include 36 ) 47 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 13 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 50. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential tracts are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the tract or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPING 51. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscape Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC. 52. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. 53. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit plans for approval by the Community Development Department prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking is complete, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner prior to submitting for signature by the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 54. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 18 inches of curbs long public streets. 55. Although storm water retention in landscape setbacks are not expressly prohibited by the Municipal Code, Section 9.100.040(B) (7), seems to imply such in that only "[i]ncidental stormwater" is permitted to be retained in 36 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 14 11 043 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 landscape areas. However, under the Subdivision and Regulations Section 13.24.130, ¶ 1, 3" sentence, Ir)etention basins" are permitted to be located within the Landscape Setbacks if approved by the City. PUBLIC SERVICES 56. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by Sunline Transit and approved by the City Engineer. QUALITY ASSURANCE 57. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 58. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such ct other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 59. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. After tributary -area improvements are complete and soils have been permanently stabilized where retention basins have been constructed, testing shall include sand filter percolation tests, as approved by the City Engineer. 60. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all public improvement plans which were signed by the City Engineer. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City to reflect the as -built conditions. MAINTENANCE 61. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 36 049 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 15 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 62. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. FEES AND DEPOSITS 63. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. FIRE DEPARTMENT: 64. Approved super fire hydrants shall be located not less than 25 feet nor more than 165 feet from any portion of the buildings as measured along vehicular travel ways. 65. Blue dot reflectors shall be placed in the street 8-inches from centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 66. Minimum fire flow 2500 GPM for a two hour duration. Fire flow is based on type VN construction and a complete fire sprinkler system. 67. Building plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for plan review to run concurrent with the City plan check. 68. All commercial buildings 5,000 square feet or larger shall be fully sprinkled. NFPA 23 Standard. Sprinkler plans will need to be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. 69. Provide primary and secondary access for emergency vehicles. 70. An operation that produces grease -laden vapors will require a Hood/duct system for fire protection. 71. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. 72. The applicant or developer, shall prepare and submit to the fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. 368 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 16 U 5 0 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 73. Install a KNOX key box on each commercial building. (Contact the Fire Department for an application.) 74. Install portable fire extinguishers as required by the California Fire Code. 75. Approved super fire hydrants shall be located not less than 25 feet nor more than 165 feet from any portion of the buildings as measured along vehicular travel ways. GENERAL: 76. All changes to the Specific Plan which are also included in the Site Development Permit shall be made to the latter to ensure consistency. The project proponent shall submit amended documents within 30 days of City Council approval of the Specific Plan or prior to issuance of a grading plan, whichever occurs first. 77. The landscaping plan shall include all frontages on City streets, and shall be installed as part of the first phase of construction on the project site. 78. Page 6 of the Specific Plan shall be amended to reflect the turning movements allowed by the City Engineer on both Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street. 79. The second paragraph of section 2.2 "Land Use Summary" shall be deleted, and replaced with the following sentence. "Land uses permitted within this Specific Plan are those uses allowed in the Neighborhood Commercial district in the Development Code." 80. Page 7 of the Specific Plan shall be amended to delete the asterisk allowing drive -through facilities at the gasoline service station. Drive-throughs shall be prohibited at the gasoline service station. 81. The last sentence on page 9 shall be deleted. 82. In section 4.3, Landscape Areas, Section 8.3 Retention, and Section 12.0, Adaptability, text and exhibits shall be modified to show a redesigned retention basin landscaping to include landscaping on the slopes and bottom of sufficient size and density to stabilize soils. The text shall eliminate all references to an additional building pad within the retention basin. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 17 05 1 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 83. The project site plan (and all exhibits which use the site plan as a base map) shall be redesigned to provide trash enclosures adjacent to the building which they serve. The new site plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to submittal of the final document after City Council approval. 84. No signage is approved as part of this approval. The project proponent shall submit a master signage program for Planning Commission review and approval. 85. All references to golf cart circulation shall be removed from the Specific Plan, including both text and exhibits. The text in section 6 shall be replaced with the following statement: "The project shall incorporate a golf cart circulation system, should such a system be adopted by the City in the future." 86. Section 6.4, Handicapped Accessibility, shall be amended to state that the project will meet City standards relating to ADA. 87. Section 7.3, Parking Lot Lighting shall be amended to include the following sentence: "All lighting, including security lighting, on the project site shall conform to City standards. A lighting plan shall be approved by the Community Development Department prior to issuance of building permits." 88. The last two sentences of the paragraph under section 8.3, Retention, shall be deleted. 89. The last sentence of section 1 1.2, Parcel Plan, shall be deleted. 90. The last paragraph of Section 12.0, Adaptability, shall be deleted. 91. All mitigation measures associated with Environmental Assessment 2001-433 are hereby incorporated into this Specific Plan. F fir G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 18 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A GASOLINE SERVICE STATION AND CAR WASH WITHIN A NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER CASE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-066 APPLICANT: RLF DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 15th day of January, 2002, and 51h day of February, 2002 hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider the request of RLF Development to allow a gasoline service station within a planned commercial center; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did on the 11 th day of December 2001, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of RLF Development to allow a gasoline service station within a planned commercial center; and WHEREAS, said Conditional Use Permit request has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended by Resolution 83-68, in that Environmental Assessment 2001-433 has been recommended with mitigation measures for certification; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify a recommendation for approval of said Conditional Use Permit: 1. The Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the City's General Plan in that the proposed project furthers the City 's General Plan goals for a full service community. The use is consistent with the goals and policies and intent of the General Plan Land Use Element (Chapter 2). 2. The approval of this Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance in that the project will conform to development standards and the standards included in Specific Plan 2001-054. 3. The proposed land use will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare or injurious to, or incompatible with other land uses in that the project will integrate into the existing neighborhood 37 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettCUPReso.WPD U 5 3 City Council Resolution 2002- Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 - RLF Development Adopted: February 5, 2002 4. An Environmental Assessment has been prepared in accordance with CEQA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That the City Council does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 to allow a gasoline service station in a planned neighborhood shopping center subject to the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and made a part of as Exhibit "A". PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 5tn day of February, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 37 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettCUPReso.WPD 11 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-058 - RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2002 1. The subdivider agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this tentative map amendment or any final map thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. The development shall comply with Site Development Permit 2001-71 1, and all applicable Conditions of Approval. 37 U55 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettCUPReso.WPD RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR A SUPERMARKET, BANK, AND DRUG STORE ON A PORTION OF A 15 ACRE NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AVENUE 52 AND JEFFERSON STREET CASE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 APPLICANT: RLF DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 15th day of January, 2002, and 5tn day of February, 2002 hold duly noticed Public Hearings for the La Quinta Court project for review of Site Development Permit to allow the construction of a supermarket and drugstore on a portion of a 15 acre shopping center at the southeast corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street, more particularly described as: APN 760-290-005 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 11 th day of December, 2001, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing and recommended approval of the Site Development Permit, subject to the conditions of approval; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering Environmental Assessment 2001-433, and all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings for approval of said Site Development Permit: 1. The proposed Site Development Permit is consistent with the General Plan goals, policies and programs relating to the Neighborhood Commercial land use designation, and supports the development of a variety of retail uses within a Specific Plan. 2. The proposed Site Development Permit is consistent with the standards of the Zoning Ordinance and is consistent with Specific Plan 2001-054, as conditioned, which establishes development standards for the project. 3. The proposed Site Development Permit will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, as it has been designed to be compatible with surrounding development, and conform with the City's standards and requirements, as conditioned. ~� e% 1 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPReso.WPD 1 5 V City Council Resolution 2002- Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 - RLF Development Adopted: February 5, 2002 4. The proposed Site Development Permit, as conditioned, complies with the architectural design standards for Specific Plan 2001-054, and implements the standards and guidelines included in that document. 5. The proposed Site Development Permit, as conditioned, is consistent with the landscaping standards in Specific Plan 2001-054 and implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case. 2. That it does hereby require compliance with those mitigation measures required in EA 2001-433. 3. That it does approve Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on the 5th of February 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 375 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPReso.WPD City Council Resolution 2002- Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 - RLF Development Adopted: February 5, 2002 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 3 7 U` 053 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPReso.WPD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2001- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2002 1. The developer agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the developer of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary permits and/or clearances from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting the improvement plans for City approval. 3. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. & 13.24.170, La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Quality Resources Control Board's ("SWQRCB") Order No. 99-08- DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs five (5) acres or more of land, or that disturbs less than five (5) acres of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than five (5) acres of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). V G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 1 059 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2002 B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this Site Development Permit. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020, LQMC): 1. Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2. Temporary Sediment Control. 3. Wind Erosion Control. 4. Tracking Control. 5. Non -Storm Water Management. 6. Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All of applicant's erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off site grading being done in relation to this project. F. All approved project BMPs shall be maintained in their proper working order throughout the course of construction, and until all improvements have been accepted by the City. 4. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). PROPERTY RIGHTS 5. Prior to the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire, or confer, those easements, and other property rights necessary for the construction and/or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services, and for the maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 378 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 2 U 6 0 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2002 6. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 7. Unless the ultimate developed right-of-way can be documented, the public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) - 120-foot ultimate developed right-of-way. 2. Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial) - 1 10-foot ultimate developed right- of-way. 8. Right-of-way geometry for property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawing #805, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 9. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features. contained in the approved construction plans. 10. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public right- of-ways as follows: A. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) - 20-foot from the ROW-P/L. B. Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial) - 20-foot from the ROW-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Parcel Map. 3 �l G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 3 0 6 i. RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2002 11. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas shown on the Site Development Plan. 12. The applicant shall vacate all abutter's right -of -access to public streets and properties from all frontages along such public streets and properties, excepting those access points shown on the Site Development Plan. 13. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, ingress/egress, or other encroachments will occur. 14. Before the applicant may be permitted to vacate, or abandonment, any existing right-of-way, or access easement, which will diminish the access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall submit a proposed alternate right-of-way or access easement to those properties, or shall submit notarized letters of consent from all affected property owners; the final approval of which rests with the City. 15. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of this Site Development Permit and the date of final acceptance of the on and off -site improvements for this Site Development Permit, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these conditions of approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 16. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 4 0 6 4 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2002 A. Off -Site Street Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 if = 4' Vertical The street improvement plans shall include permanent traffic control and separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. B. Off -Site Street Median Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' C. Perimeter Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' D. On -Site Site Development Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal E. On -Site Utility Plan: 1 if = 20' Horizontal F. On -Site Landscape Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal G. On -Site Lighting Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. "Site Development" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements; and show the existing street improvements out to at least the center lines of Jefferson Street & Avenue 52. "Site Utility" plans shall normally include all sub -surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to sewer lines, water lines, fire protection and storm drainage systems. "Rough Grading" plans shall include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. 17. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040, LQMC. 18. The City maintains standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City resolution, the applicant may purchase such standard. plans, detail sheets and/or construction 381 notes from the City. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 5 J RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2002 19. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all complete, approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format which can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 20. Prior to the conditional approval of this Site Development Plan, or the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 21. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Site Development Permit, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28, LQMC. 22. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monuments. 23. When improvements are to be secured through a SIA, and prior to any permits being issued by the City, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on and off -site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution, or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit costs r shall be approved b the City Engineer. 3 8 .� PP Y Y 9 Am G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 6 0 6 Lt RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2002 At the same time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for the security determination of the SIA, the applicant shall also submit one copy of an 8-1/2 if x 11 " reduction of each page of the Parcel Map, along with one copy of an 8-1/2 it x 11 " Vicinity Map. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates for its own on and off -site improvements. Cost estimates for the security of telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements will not be required. Development -wide improvements shall not be agendized for final acceptance by the City Council until the City has received confirmation from the telephone authority that the applicant has met all the requirements for telephone service to all proposed buildings shown on the Site Development Plan. 24. When improvements are phased through an administrative approval (e.g., Phasing Plan, Site Development Permits, etc.), all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the occupancy of any permanent buildings in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The same submittal criteria shall apply to all subsequent phases as required for the first phase submittal. (E.g. detailed cost estimates, 8-1 /2" x 11 " reductions, etc.) 25. In the event the applicant fails to construct improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, or other phasing method, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 383 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 7 0 6 5 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2002 GRADING 26. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 27. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 28. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, and C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on any final map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions submitted with its application for a grading permit. 29. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 30. The applicant shall minimize differences in elevation between the adjoining properties. DRAINAGE 31. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), LQMC, Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03 and the following: G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 8 o 6 U RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2002 32. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water may be disposed of in a trickling sand filter and leach field approved by the City Engineer. The sand filter and leach field shall be designed to contain surges of up to 3 GP/1,000 sq. ft. of landscape area, and infiltrate 5 g.p.d./1,000 sq. ft. Or nuisance water may be diverted to the landscaped areas. 33. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 34. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 35. Pursuant to Section 13.24.120 (D), LQMC, the On -Site retention basin shall be sized to not only accommodate the on -site storm runoff, but also the tributary runoff from the adjacent streets. UTILITIES 36. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.1 10 (Utilities), LQMC. 37. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 38. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 39. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 9 6 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2002 The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 40. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Off -Site Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Properties), LQMC. 41. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit a Transportation Demand Management (T.M.) Plan in accordance with the City's T.M. Ordinance, Chapter 9.180, LQMC. The applicant shall be responsible for improvements found necessary to mitigate the traffic impacts of this development. 42. Pursuant to Section 9.150.080(A)(8)(b), LQMC, the applicant shall provide 90- foot uninterrupted driveway throats into the parking lot, or alternatively provide a combination of a dedicated right turn deceleration lane and the drive throat that will equal a total of 90 feet. 43. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC, adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, and as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 44. Standard corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #805, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 45. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations which convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue for street sweeping. 46. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial; 1 10' R/W option): Widen south side of street along all frontage adjacent to the Specific Plan boundary. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing 3 t G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 10 068 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2002 roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. Other significant new improvements required for installation in, or adjacent, to the subject right of way include: (a) 6-foot wide meandering sidewalk (b) 18-foot wide landscaped median from the roundabout to the east boundary of the Specific Plan The pavement rehabilitation/reconstruction, and landscape median improvements, are eligible for reimbursement from the City's Development Impact Fee fund in accordance with policies established for that program. 2) Jefferson Street a) Applicant shall construct median openings and turn pockets to accommodate the turning movements authorized by these Conditions of Approval. b) Applicant shall install a traffic signal at the project's main entry, located 1 130 ± feet south of Avenue 52 centerline, when warrants are met. Applicant is responsible for 50% of cost to design and install traffic signal if complementing cost share from development on other side of street is available at time signal is required. Applicant shall enter into an improvement agreement and post security for 50% of the cost to design and construct the traffic signal prior to issuance of an onsite grading permit; the security shall remain in effect until the signal is constructed by the applicant or the developer on the other side of the street. If the land on the other side of the street does not have an approved project connecting to the subject intersection, Applicant shall pay 100% of cost to design and install a signal at the resulting "T" intersection. If, however, the Applicant's development trails the progress of the 3r G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 11 069 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2002 development on the other side of the street and the other development is connecting to the subject intersection, the Applicant is responsible for 50% of the cost as previously stated in this condition. 47. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential Collector Secondary Arterial Primary Arterial Major Arterial 3.0" A.C./4.50" A.B. 4.0"/5.00" 4.0"/6.00" 4.5"/6.00" 5.511/6.5011 or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. PARKING LOTS 1) The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 48. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Primary Entry (Jefferson Street, 1 130 ± feet S. of the C/L Intersection with Avenue 52): Full turn access. B. Secondary Entry (Jefferson Street, 810 ± feet S. of the C/L Intersection with Avenue 52): Right turn in, Right turn out. C. Secondary Entry (Jefferson Street, 490 ± feet S. of the C/L Intersection with Avenue 52): Right turn in, Right turn out, Left turn in. 3 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 12 070 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2002 D. Primary Entry (Avenue 52, 375 ±feet E. of the C/L Intersection with Jefferson Street): Left & Right turn in, Right turn out. E. Secondary Entry (Avenue 52, 635 ± feet E. of the C/L Intersection with Jefferson Street): Right turn in, Right turn out. F. This Secondary Entry shall be a shared access drive/road with the adjacent landowner and be centered on the easterly property line. The shared access drive/road layout shall be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In the event the adjacent landowner desires a security gate serving its property, the gate shall be located away from the property line sufficient distance with the following access road design features occurring on the adjacent landowners property: adequate stacking, a rejection turnaround feature, and a separate lane for guests. In the event the adjacent landowner does not reasonably cooperate with the applicant in assisting with the shared access drive/road requirement, the City may allow the applicant to implement an alternative design concept satisfactory to the City Engineer, including but not limited to, elimination of the shared access requirement. Nothing in this condition requires the adjacent landowner to pay for sufficient improvements to implement the shared access requirement in a manner that serves the development proposed by Site Development Permit 0 1 -711. However, reasonable cooperation by the adjacent landowner does include granting of reciprocal cross -access easements between the two landowners that facilitate construction of improvements necessary to implement the shared access concept on both properties in a manner that precludes unnecessary reconstruction of the improvements in the future. 49. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 50. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 51. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements. 3�3 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 13 0 7 1 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2002 CONSTRUCTION 52. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 53. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential tracts are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the tract or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPING 54. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscape Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC. 55. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. 56. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit plans for approval by the Community Development Department prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking is complete, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner prior to submitting for signature by the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 0 7 ', G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 14 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2002 57. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 18 inches of curbs long public streets. 58. Only incidental stormwater will be permitted to be retained in landscape areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right of way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to Section 9.100.040(B)(7), LQMC. PUBLIC SERVICES 59. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by Sunline Transit and approved by the City Engineer. QUALITY ASSURANCE 60. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 61. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 62. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. After tributary -area improvements are complete and soils have been permanently stabilized where retention basins have been constructed, testing shall include sand filter percolation tests, as approved by the City Engineer. 63. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all public improvement plans which were signed by the City Engineer. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City to reflect the as -built conditions. 11 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 15 U RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2002 MAINTENANCE 64. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 65. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. FEES AND DEPOSITS 66. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. GENERAL: 67. The subdivider agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this tentative map amendment or any final map thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 68. No signage is approved as part of this approval. The project proponent shall submit a master signage program for Planning Commission approval. 69. Proposed buildings for the gas station site, or pads A, B, C, D, E or F shall be required to submit separate Site Development Permits. 70. All buildings on the site, and particularly the drug store building, shall be designed to include the covered walkways and heavy pillars proposed for the supermarket building. The design of the entire site shall demonstrate a consistent level of architectural detailing with specific attention to rear elevations. 71. The entry of the drug store building shall be squared on the corner, and consistent with the supermarket building design. 3 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 16 0719 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2002 72. The retention basin landscaping shall be redesigned to include landscaping on the slopes and bottom of sufficient size and density to stabilize soils. 73. The project site plan (and all exhibits which use the site plan as a base map) shall be redesigned to provide trash enclosures adjacent to the building which they serve. The new site plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to submittal of the final document after City Council approval. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 17 U T a 4hf D �i" Qu&t/ AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 5, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing on the Adoption of a Resolution to vacate ortions of Avenida Bermudas North of Calle Tampico, Calle Amigo Near Avenue 52, Avenue 48 West of Washington Street, and a 12' Utility Easement Between Lots 16 and 17 of Tract 2667 BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to vacate portions of Avenida Bermudas north of Calle Tampico, Calle Amigo near Avenue 52, Avenue 48 west of Washington Street, and a 12' utility easement between lots 16 and 17 of Tract 2667. None. None Avenida Bermudas - (Street right-of-way) The land that includes the northern section of right- of-way on Avenida Bermudas shown in Attachment 1 is being developed by KSL Land Corporation. This portion, specifically described in Attachment 2, will be part of the remote parking lot for the La Quinta Hotel. This section of right-of-way is not needed by other property for access or improved accessibility. Calle Amigo - (Street right-of-way) Due to the realignment of Avenue 52, as shown on Attachment 3, Calle Amigo contains a portion of right-of-way that is no longer required. This portion of right-of-way is specifically described in Attachment 4 and is not needed by other property owners for access, or improved accessibility. Lots 16 and 17, Tract 2667 - (Public Utility Easement) Lots 16 and 17 were merged in 1992. As shown in Attachment 5, there is a 12' Public Utility Easement that runs east and west along the old lot line between the two lots. The easement is specifically described in Attachment 6. Since these lots are merged, the homeowner requests that the easement be vacated. 394 T:\PW DEPT\COU NOL\2002\020205e.wpd Avenue 48 - (Street right-of-way) This portion of Avenue 48 right-of-way is located west of Washington north of the south boundary line of Section 30, Township 5 south, Range 7 east as shown in Attachment 7. In 1901 the Riverside County Board of Supervisors took action in response to a petition and acquired 60' of right-of-way along section lines in certain sections in the County. The 30' wide portion of right-of-way located south of the section line was previously vacated when Laguna De La Paz was developed. The La Quinta Arts Foundation is currently developing the land located on the north side of the section line that includes the 30' wide portion of right-of-way located north of the section line. This portion of right-of-way is specifically described in Attachment 8. The Arts Foundation is designing and implementing a street system that does not use the existing right-of-way along the section line; therefore, this 30' wide parcel of right-of-way is no longer needed and the Foundation requests that it be vacated. The City mailed out notification letters to all potentially affected public agencies, setting January 11, 2002 as the deadline for comments. No public agency has responded with negative comments or have requested additional easements. The application was considered by the Planning Commission on December 11, 2001 . The Planning Commission found the proposed vacations to be consistent with the La Quinta General Plan. On January 15, 2002 the City Council adopted Resolution 2002-03, declaring its intent to vacate the right-of-way and schedule a Public Hearing. Public Hearing notices were posted on the property to be vacated and published in the newspaper, in accordance with the Streets and Highways Code. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to vacate portions of Avenida Bermudas north of Calle Tampico, Calle Amigo near Avenue 52, Avenue 48 west of Washington Street, and a 12' utility easement between lots 16 and 17 of Tract 2667; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council to vacate portions of Avenida Bermudas north of Calle Tampico, Calle Amigo near Avenue 52, Avenue 48 west of Washington Street, and a 12' utility easement between Lots 16 and 17 of Tract 2667; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. 3y T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020205e.wpd Respectfully su Witte Rofi F. S'Ophenson P.E. Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: homas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Vicinity Map 2. Legal Description 3. Vicinity Map 4. Legal Description 5. Vicinity Map 6. Legal Description 7. Vicinity Map 8. Legal Description T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020205e.wpd 1ix RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, VACATING PORTIONS OF AVENIDA BERMUDAS NORTH OF CALLE TAMPICO, CALLE AMIGO NEAR AVENUE 52, AVENUE 48 WEST OF WASHINGTON STREET, AND A 12' UTILITY EASEMENT BETWEEN LOTS 16 AND 17 OF TRACT 2667 CASE NO'S. RW-V 2001-07, 2001-08, 2001-09, 2001-10 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta did adopt Resolution 2002-03, declaring its intention to vacate portions of Avenida Bermudas north of Calle Tampico, Calle Amigo near Avenue 52, Avenue 48 west of Washington Street, and a 12' utility easement between Lots 16 and 17 of Tract 2667, setting the date of February 5, 2002, at the hour of 7:00 P.M., in the La Quinta Civic Center Council Chambers as the date, time, and place for the hearing of all persons interested in presenting their views and testimony in regard to the proposed vacations; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 8322 and 8323 of the Public Streets, Highways and Service Easement Vacation Law, due notice of the Public Hearing was given by public posting in the time and manner prescribed by law, and, WHEREAS, following its discussion of the street vacation application on December 11, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta has determined that the vacation of said portions of Avenida Bermudas north of Calle Tampico, Calle Amigo near Avenue 52, Avenue 48 west of Washington Street, and a 12' utility easement between Lots 16 and 17 of Tract 2667, is not in conflict with the Infrastructure Element or other policies of the General Plan of the City of La Quinta; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta has conducted the required public hearing upon due notice and, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested parties and persons desiring to be heard, did find the facts to exist justifying the approval and adoption of said portions of Avenida Bermudas north of Calle Tampico, Calle Amigo near Avenue 52, Avenue 48 west of Washington Street, and a 12' utility easement between Lots 16 and 17 of Tract 2667 vacations, as follows: 1. Vacation of the subject portions of Avenida Bermudas north of Calle Tampico, Calle Amigo near Avenue 52, Avenue 48 west of Washington Street, and a 12' utility easement between Lots 16 and 17 of Tract 2667, will not adversely affect the City of La Quinta or adversely impact the Circulation Element of the City of La Quinta General Plan. 2. The affected portions of Avenida Bermudas north of Calle Tampico, Calle Amigo near Avenue 52, Avenue 48 west of Washington Street, and a 12' 39t' TAPWDEPT\STAFF\GUZMAN\reso.wpd ,. 0 O 3A utility easement between Lots 16 and 17 of Tract 2667 are unnecessary for either present or prospective public use or purposes, including use as non - motorized transportation facilities. 3. No local public agency has submitted objections to the proposed vacation of portions of Avenida Bermudas north of Calle Tampico, Calle Amigo near Avenue 52, Avenue 48 west of Washington Street, and a 12' utility easement between Lots 16 and 17 of Tract 2667. 4. Approval and adoption of the proposed vacation of portions of Avenida Bermudas north of Calle Tampico, Calle Amigo near Avenue 52, Avenue 48 west of Washington Street, and a 12' utility easement between Lots 16 and 17 of Tract 2667, will not cause a significant negative impact upon the environment, due, in part, to the fact that extinguishment of the right-of-way will restore possession of the vacated portions of Avenida Bermudas north of Calle Tampico, Calle Amigo near Avenue 52, Avenue 48 west of Washington Street, and a 12' utility easement between Lots 16 and 17 of Tract 2667 to the vested owner of the abutting parcel of real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City Council, having elected to proceed under the provisions of Chapter 3 of the Public Streets, Highways and Service Easement Vacation Law of the State of California, and having held a public hearing upon due notice as provided therein, hereby finds from all evidence submitted that the portions of Avenida Bermudas north of Calle Tampico, Calle Amigo near Avenue 52, Avenue 48 west of Washington Street, and a 12' utility easement between Lots 16 and 17 of Tract 2667, specifically described in attachments 1-8, attached hereto and incorporated herein, are unnecessary for either present or prospective public use or purposes, including use as non -motorized transportation facilities. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby orders the vacation of the portions of Avenida Bermudas north of Calle Tampico, Calle Amigo near Avenue 52, Avenue 48 west of Washington Street, and a 12' utility easement between Lots 16 and 17 of Tract 2667, as shown in attachments 1-8 attached hereto and incorporated herein. SECTION 3: The City Council hereby determines that adoption of the vacations will cause no significant negative environmental impact. SECTION 4: The City Council hereby orders that the vacations shall not be effective until a certified copy of this Resolution, has been recorded with the Riverside County Recorder. SECTION 5: The City Council hereby determines and orders that the City Clerk 39 is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside County, California. 003E T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\GUZMAN\reso.wpd PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 5th day of February, 2002, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 3y j TAPWDEPT\STAFF\GUZMAN\reso.wpd 003C EXHIBIT AVENIDA BERMUDAS STREET VACATION i SCALE 1 " = 300' CALLS TAMPICO I dIW dIN zH zz PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: • 3 bl CHRIS J. BER L.S. idja 88 AT EXP. 12/31 /0 -3 6_f ATTACHMENT 1 J NE CORNER SE 1/4, NE 1/4, \ SECTION 1, T. 6S., R. 6E. N 89'59'20" E 33.00' N 89059'20" E 33.00, E 1/4 CORNER SECTION 1 \o�P� LAND s LEGEND C-`' \� J. eF� �'�� - ADJACENT LOT LINE a U� _ ® EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY TO BE VACATED L.S. 6588 * Exp. 12-31-03 J'J9TF M O R S E 79-799 Old Avenue 52 . La Quinla, CA 92253 colDOKICH Voice:760-771-4013 S c H u L r z FAX: 760-77141073 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS OF CAL AVENIDA BERMUDAS STREET VACATION CITY OF LA QUINTA 00 I:\51328\MAPPING\8ERM-VAC.DWG 2-22-2001 ATTACHMENT 2 EXHIBIT"A79 AVENIDA BERMUDAS STREET VACATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN; THENCE SOUTH 89059'20" WEST, • QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER 0 FEET; THENCE PARALLEL TO AND 33.00 FEET EASTERLY OF THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST OF SAID SECTION 6, SOUTH 0000'40" EAST, 682.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89059'20" WEST, 33.00 FEET TO A POINT OF SAID WEST LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 00 00'40" WEST, 682.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: o a �o CHRIS J. B GH, P. . ". 6588 D T EXP. DATE: 12/31/20 L AND S. L, c I T L.S. 6588 ' Exp. 12-31-03 PAGE 1 OF 1 GA513\28\LEGALS\BERM VAC.doc 2/22/01 ATTACHMENT 4 d6 :0qFii- CURVE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH L1.J C1 01037'24' 420.00' 11.90' C2 0412150 15' 1145.00' 84.02' C3 08'20'53" 775.00' 112.92* C4 23' 13'2S" 450.00' 182.39' m PARCEL MERGER 2001-387 R.O.W. DEDICATED TO THE CITY 6/29/01 U OF LA OUINTA 5/11/01 #302237 1206352, 206353 do 206354 W 0 sue\ o 0 v , P.O.B. \ LOT A N69'SS 14„ :. _ TR 28470-1 Sj�S� ,, tul8 263/76-90 CALLS AM IGO "" �2�p0 52 W(Rl �r LOT G LN�pS>> �iR �S W fui8 19/75 `,..`� �\ V No, � CS SCALE 1" =40' 0 20 40 80 120 RIGHT OF WAY VACATION ITK PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: � LAND The Keith Companies C, KEIZ f No. 6687 �r ( �-Z' Exp.06/30/04 41-865 Boardwalk, Suite 101. Pdm Desert, CA 92211 (760) 346-9844 DALE K LLEHER LS 6687 EXP. 6-30-04 slglF � • 41 ATTACHMENT 4 EXHIBIT "A" RIGHT OF WAY VACATION CALLE AMIGO A PORTION OF CALLE AMIGO, SHOWN AS LOT G OF DESERT CLUB TRACT UNIT NO. 1 AS SHOWN IN MAP BOOK 19, PAGE 75, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT G, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY FROM WHERE A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 12005'44" WEST; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT G ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 775.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 112.86 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8020'38" TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENT CURVE, SAID CURVE BEING CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND FROM POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 72019' 51" EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 420.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 10.76 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01 °28'03"; THENCE SOUTH 67046' 11" EAST A DISTANCE OF 37.06 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT A OF TRACT 28470-1 AS SHOWN IN MAP BOOK 263, PAGES 76 THROUGH 90, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AND FROM WHERE A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 26009'40" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1145.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 84.02 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4012' 15" TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PORTION CONTAINS 1,686 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION BEING SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "B" AND HEREBY BEING MADE A PART HEREOF. ��0 LKEDCS��G� No. 6687 Exp. 06/30/04 �� lgrF 4F CA\.\F�\ Page 1 of 1 P PA DUN THE SUPERVISION OF �r March 27. 1 A L H R DATE 0:\40702\40702016\survey\DESCLUBRW\DCBGIVE2.doc THE K ITH COMPANIES -PALM DESERT TKC # 40702.00.019 760-346-9844 760-346-9368 w � t�'a� to ��— 3�� . • : � - - ATTACHMENT 5 95 vz PAR f� OD A. ��:. � ��• .� .,. .- ''� - sue, :- ,� ._. �} �► ' .:• s o " - ,C�� tit � ' � `� .. _. _ �j� -' - '*�i - hQ, -- � o ` L s 40.5' Yl 71 1VB °3'S5 `00 "E: -�_:.7J .. _ Na _ ,071 _N NER R.OA'D,:R.. tit OL � - - _ to - ' ' -•�- � ' 1 :►� •'L •. .» . � ..: t: r ATTACHMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS TO BE VACATED PARCEL 1: That portion of Lot 16 of Tract No. 2667, as shown by map on file in Book 50, Pages 64 and 65, of Maps, Records of Riverside County, California, described as follows: The 6.00 feet wide Public Utility Easement shown on said map affecting the Northerly 6.00 feet of said lot, excepting therefrom the Westerly 6.00 feet of said lot. PARCEL 2: That portion of Lot 17 of Tract No. 2667, as shown by map on file in Book 50, Pages 64 and 65, of Maps, Records of Riverside County, California, described as follows: The 6.00 feet wide Public Utility Easement shown on said map affecting the Southerly 6.00 feet of said Lot, excepting therefrom the Westerly 6.00 feet of said lot. * No.25M EXPIRESDoc 31. MI � C 1 V % %, CE f XI,%* b 4') 010 -77 0 IIW M „ �O N -W -W PMi PMI CV It IV C%4 --w -W C=) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 =0 c= 0 0 c= I U W OL Z V1v --L Lc'.) d • J O O !►l►� .y N7 � U v W (/1 11 Qfj O0 • ATTACHMENT O N !N O C O Z N 2 r O I A /V yA YJr3r0 WA I ate .n X10 o c� 3153/31 WA N CV OOIINOW WA I 0 N/pyNIYIA O w Wen o, O M Os f� �4m N N r 33IN 1U ►'NV2NOW N/A eo r•a e n jgN 3ZAGEM WA 7 i oN C J • ATTACHMENTS EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Avenue 48 Street Vacation The South 30.00 feet of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 5 South, Range 7 East, SBM. Excepting therefrom, the East 60.00 feet of said Southwest Quarter, being that portion of the ultimate right-of-way of Washington Street. This legal description was prepared by me or under my supervision on January 28, 2002. r Eric Nelson, PLS CV ,;ei4 4 QdArA AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 5, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Public Hearing to Certify Environmental Assessment 2001-415 and Approve Tentative Tract Ma 29963 PUBLIC HEARING: pP P and Street Name Change 2001-013, A Request to Subdivide 9.1 Acres into Four Single Family Lots Located at the Northern Terminus of Kirk Court Approximately 659 Feet North of Avenue 58, and Rename Kirk Court to Coral Mountain Court Applicant: Dr. and Mrs. Bruce Baumann RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to certify a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact (EA 2001-415); and 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to approve Tentative Tract Map 29963, subject to findings and conditions; and 3. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to approve Street Name Change 2001- 013, subject to findings. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Property History The 9.1-acre site, consisting of two parcels, is vacant and fronts onto the terminus of Kirk Court, an unimproved 50' wide cul-de-sac street that connects to Avenue 58 408 (Attachment 1). Dense vegetation exists on portions of the site and a six-foot high wall separates this site from PGA West properties to the north. Project Request The Map proposes to create four single family lots that exceed two acres in size fronting onto proposed Coral Mountain Court (Attachment 2). Under the subdivision request, the length of proposed Coral Mountain Court has been increased by approximately 180 feet (Private Street Lot "A") to serve each lot. Infrastructure improvements will be extended to the site to provide adequate urban services, including two lanes of paving. As proposed, each lot will contain its own stormwater retention facilities. Concurrent with the land division request, the applicant has requested that the City rename Kirk Court to Coral Mountain Court. Regarding this request, only four existing lots front onto the unimproved local street, and the applicant owns two of the affected parcels. No objections to the proposed name change have been received. Planning Commission Review On January 8, 2002, the Planning Commission, on a 5-0 vote, adopted Resolutions 2002-001 through 2002-003, recommending to the City Council certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of Tentative Tract Map 29963 and Street Name Change 2001-013, subject to findings and conditions (Attachment 3 - Minutes). Public Notice This project was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on January 23, 2002, and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site. To date, no comments have been received from adjacent property owners. Any written comments received will be handed out at the meeting. Agency Comments A copy of this request has been sent to all applicable public agencies and City Departments. All written comments received are on file with the Community Development Department. Applicable comments received have been included in the recommended Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The findings necessary to approve this request can be made, and are included in the attached Resolutions. P/SR CC Tr.29963 41ot - Greg 4U� 0 i''D, 2 The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to certify a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact (EA 2001-415); and Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to approve Tentative Tract Map 29963, subject to findings and conditions; and Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to approve Street Name Change 2001- 013, subject to findings; or 2. Do not approve the above -mentioned Resolutions; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Jer erma , Community Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Location Map 2. Proposed Tract Map Exhibit 3. January 8, 2002, Planning Commission Minutes (Excerpt) 4. Large Map (Council only) 41.0 C3 P/SR CC Tr.29963 41ot - Greg RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CERTIFICATION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CASE NO.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-415 APPLICANT: DR. AND MRS. BRUCE BAUMANN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5tn day of February, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for Environmental Assessment 2001-415 for Tentative Tract Map 29963, located at the northernmost terminus of Kirk Court which is approximately 659' north of Avenue 58, more particularly described as follows: Parcels 1 & 2 of Parcel Map 8843, including portions of Kirk Court; APN: 762-240-007 and -008 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 13th day of November, 2001, 11 th day of December, 2001, and 8t`' day of January, 2002, hold duly noticed Public Hearings for Environmental Assessment 2001- 415 for Tentative Tract Map 29963, and on a 5-0 vote, adopted Resolution 2002- 001, recommending to the City Council certification of said Environmental Assessment; and WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study (EA 2001-415) and has determined that although the proposed residential development could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because appropriate mitigation measures were made a part of the assessment and included in the conditions of approval and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be certified; and WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to certify said Environmental Assessment: 1 . The proposed Tentative Tract Map will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2001-415. 4I-L OC4 Resolution No. 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-415 for TTM 29963 Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 2 2. The proposed Tentative Tract Map Amendment will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 4. The proposed Tentative Tract Map does not have the potential to achieve short- term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the revised Environmental Assessment. 5. The proposed Tentative Tract Map will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. 6. The proposed Tentative Tract Map will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 8. The City Council has considered the Environmental Assessment 2001-415 and the Environmental Assessment reflects the independent judgment of the City. 9. The City has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 10. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. 4� 1cj Resolution No. 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-415 for TTM 29963 Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 3 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitutes the findings of the City Council for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby recommend certification of Environmental Assessment 2001-415 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum on file in the Community Development Department. 3. That Environmental Assessment 2001-415 reflects the independent judgment of the City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 5th day of February, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) INLI G v Resolution No. 2002 Environmental Assessment 2001-415 for TTM 29963 Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 41' UG7 Environmental Checklist Form ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-415 1 . Project Title: Tentative Tract Map 29963 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Greg Trousdell 760-777-7125 4. Project Location: North side of Avenue 581 west of Madison Street (APN 762-240-007 and -008) 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Mr. & Mrs. Baumann 55625 Riviera La Quinta, CA 92253 6. General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential 7. Zoning: Low Density Residential 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Subdivision of 9.1 acres into four residential lots and one lettered lot for a cul-de-sac. 9. Surrounding Lane Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings. North: Vacant, PGA West South: Avenue 58, vacant low density residential lands East: Vacant and scattered residential West: Vacant and scattered residential 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\TTM29963CkList.WPD 1 41,E uG3 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology and Soils Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service Systems 0 Mandatory Findings I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Christine di lorio Printed Name iZ � Dat CITY OF LA QUINTA 0 0 0 4� u C,` 3 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\TTM29963CkList.WPD 2 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Neaative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced) . 5) Earlier analyzes may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyzes are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The analysis of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\TTM29963CkList.WPD Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: I. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (General Plan Exhibit CIR-5) b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (General Plan EIR, page 5-12 ff.) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials) AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES:. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Dept. Of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29, 5-32) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (Aerial photographs) III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact X X X X X X KI X X X G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\TTM29963CkList.WPD 4 IV. 1M d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Application materials) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Application materials) BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) c) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) Either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (La Quinta Municipal Code; General Plan) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? ("Historical/ Archaeological Resources Survey Report," CRM Tech, 9/7/2001) X X X X X X 410 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\TTM29963CkList.WPD b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resources (i.e., an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? ("Historical/ Archaeological Resources Survey Report," CRM Tech, 9/7/2001) c) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? ("Paleontological Resources Assessment Report, CRM Tech, 9/7/2001) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ("Historical/ Archaeological Resources Survey Report," CRM Tech, 9/7/2001) VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Preliminary Geotechnical Report, Southland Geotechnical, dated February, 2000) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (General Plan EIR, page 4- 30 ff. and Preliminary Geotechnical Report, Southland Geotechnical, dated February, 2000) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff. and Preliminary Geotechnical Report, Southland Geotechnical, dated February, 2000) iv) Landslides? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) c) Be located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff. And Preliminary Geotechnical Report, Southland Geotechnical, dated February, 2000) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff. and Preliminary Geotechnical Report, Southland Geotechnical, dated February, 2000) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-32) X X X E No MEMO��M= tw J G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\TTM29963CkList.WPD 6 013 VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Application Materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Application Materials) c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Application Materials) d) Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Riverside County Hazardous Materials Listing) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip; would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-1 1) h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildlands fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (Master . Environmental Assessment 6-26, 6-27) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (General Plan EIR, page 4-57 ff.) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR, page 4- 59 ff.) MEMO MEMO MEMO MEMO R X 4'.1 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\TTM29963CkList.WPD r � 4 d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on - or off -site? (General Plan EIR, page 4-59 ff.) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems to control? (General Plan EIR, page 4-59 ff.) f) Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-13 ) g) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-13) IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Project Description) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local costal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purposes of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan Land Use Element) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-5) X. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29) XI. NOISE: Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-157 ff. and Preliminary Noise Study, RK Engineering Group, August 2001) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?(General Plan EIR, p. 4-157 ff. and Preliminary Noise Study, RK Engineering Group, August 2001) X X K4 F5 X X X P. X X 4 r) A-. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\TTM29963CkList.WPD c) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-157 ff. and Preliminary Noise Study, RK Engineering Group, August 2001) d) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Application Materials) e) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive levels? (General Plan map) XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) ? (General Plan, page 2-14) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff. ) Police protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff. ) Schools? (General Plan MEA, page 4-9 ff. ) Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA, page 4-14 ff. ) XIV. RECREATION: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application Materials) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application Materials) G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\TTM29963CkList.WPD 0 m 0 X X X K4 X XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-126 ff.) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-126 ff.) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (Application Materials) d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-126 ff.) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Application Materials) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Application Materials) g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Application Materials) XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24 ) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, page 4-27) d) Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, page 4- 20) e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, page 4-20) f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?(General Plan MEA, page 4-28) MEMO E No MMME MMME MEMO X X X X Ix X �w G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\TTM29963CkList.WPD U 1 10 XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSIS. U X 1:1 X Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. None b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. See attached Addendum. SOURCES: Master Environmental Assessment, City of La Quinta General Plan 1992 General Plan, City of La Quinta, 1992 SCAQMD CEQA Handbook Paleontological Lakebed Delineation Map, City of La Quinta City of La Quinta Municipal Code 2a G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\TTM29963CkList.WPD a old "Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report," prepared by CRM Tech, September 2001 "Paleontological Resources Assessment Report," prepared by CRM Tech, September, 2001 "Preliminary Geotechnical Report," Southland Geotechnical, February, 2000 "Preliminary Noise Study," RK Engineering Group, August 2001 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\TTM29963CkList.WPD 12 Addendum for Environmental Assessment 2001-415 for Tentative Tract Map 29963 III. a) & c) Air quality in the Coachella Valley and the City is primarily affected by vehicular emissions. The development of this project could generate up to 40 average daily trips'. These trips will generate considerably fewer emissions than originally considered in the City's General Plan EIR, insofar as the property was analyzed assuming up to four units per acre, which could have generated up to 36 dwelling units, and up to 360 daily trips. The impacts associated with the proposed subdivision are expected to be less than significant. V. a) & b) A cultural resource study was completed for the subject property2. The survey found that no significant resources occur on the site, and therefore that no significant impact is likely on the subject property. V. c) A paleontologic survey was conducted on the subject property3. The area was within the historic lakebed of ancient Lake Cahuilla, and the investigation resulted in a conclusion that the likelihood of vertebrate fossils is moderate, and invertebrate fossils high. In order to mitigate this potential impact, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1. A qualified archaeological and paleontologic monitor shall be on -site during all earth moving activities. Should any archaeological or paleontological resources be observed during grading or excavation of the proposed site, all work activity shall cease in the area of the observation, until such time as a qualified archaeologist/paleontologist can observe the find, determine appropriate actions to be taken, and develop a mitigation plan for such find. A report on the findings made at the site shall be filed with the Community Development Department. VI. a) i) & ii) A preliminary geotechnical investigation was completed for the project site". The survey found that the soils at the site are appropriate for single family development, and that no significant impacts associated with geological hazards are expected at the site. ' "Trip Generation, 6th Edition, Volume 1 " prepared by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Single Family detached housing (210) used. 2 Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey, y, prepared by CRM Tech, September 2001. 3 Paleontological Resources Assessment Report, prepared by CRM Tech, September 2001. 4�� 4 "Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation," prepared by Southland Geotechnical, February t 2000. 020 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\ttm29963addend 1 XI. a) A noise study was completed for the proposed project and lots immediately south'. The study found that because of the distance of the proposed lots from Avenue 58, impacts associated with noise will be less than significant at the project site, and no mitigation is necessary. XIII. a) The proposed development will have an impact on public services. Site development will generate property tax which will offset the costs of added services. Impacts to public services are not expected to be significant. XV . a) The project area will be required to pay the mandated school fees as development occurs. These fees mitigate the students generated, and offset the impacts to schools. The proposed project is expected to generate up to 40 trips per day on City roadways, considerably fewer than had been analyzed in the City's General plan EIR. Development of the proposed project as currently planned, therefore, will have less than significant impacts on traffic and circulation. XVI. a)-f) The buildout of the site will require service from utility providers. The overall impacts on these services is not expected to be significant, insofar as these suppliers will charge the residents for their services, and provide improvements to these services as needed. In addition, connection fees will be required at construction of any project. These fees and charges will mitigate the potential impacts to a less than significant level. 420~ 5 "Coral Mountain Estates Preliminary Noise Study," prepared by RK Engineering Group, August 2001. (121. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\ttm29963addend 2 W E� d �7 z � W � H W o x F 00 0 3 x o � o a V 00 z ., O a o w a a o O a ~w z � O � Hz z as r o W W a N 00 H �O � zw A O z OE., U W F A U� �A aU Ox VV U 0 0 0 W p.•rA U L '' � 0 a� En 0 H Q b z 0 U a, 0 z 1-, ° � H � W o E 0 W o � aW a as U • i"" 024 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 9.1 ACRES INTO FOUR SINGLE FAMILY ESTATE AND ONE LETTERED STREET LOTS LOCATED AT THE NORTHERNMOST TERMINUS OF KIRK COURT, APPROXIMATELY 659 FEET NORTH OF AVENUE 58 CASE: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29963 APPLICANT: DR. AND MRS. BRUCE BAUMANN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 51h day of February, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by the Baumann Family to create four single family and one lettered street lots on 9.1 acres located at the northerly terminus of Kirk Court in an Low Density Residential (RL) Zoning District, more particularly described as: Parcels 1 & 2 of Parcel Map 8843, including portions of Kirk Court; APN: 762-240-007 and -008 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 13th -day of November, 2001, and 1 1 th day of December, 2001, and 811 day of January, 2002, hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider a request by the Baumann Family to create four single family and one lettered street lots on 9.1 acres located at the northerly terminus of Kirk Court in an Low Density Residential (RL) Zoning District, and on a 5-0 vote, adopted Resolution 2002-002, recommending approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the La Quinta Community Development Department has completed Environmental Assessment 2001-415. Based upon this assessment, the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment; therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following Mandatory Findings to justify approval of said Map: Finding A - Consistency with General Plan, Zoning Code and any applicable Specific Plan The property is designated Low Density Residential (LDR). The Land Use Element of the General Plan encourages differing residential developments throughout the City. This project is consistent with the goals, policies and intent of the La Quinta General 023 Resolution No. 2002- TTM 29963, Baumann Family Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 2 Plan insofar as the creation of estate residential lots (0.43 dwelling units per acre) will provide another type of housing market for La Quinta residents while not exceeding the City's maximum density of four units per acre. Concerning the construction of Kirk Court to its ultimate width, Conditions are recommended requiring two lanes of paving from the site to Avenue 58 and obligations for expansion of Avenue 58 to its ultimate width based on the City's General Plan Circulation Element provisions. The property is designated Low Density Residential (RL) and is consistent with the City's General Plan Land Use Element. The estate lots exceed the City's minimum of 7,200 square feet. No houses are proposed for the project under this application. All plans for future single family homes shall be consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Code in effect at the time building permits are acquired. The development of the project, as conditioned, will be compatible with the surrounding area. Finding B - Site Design and Improvements Infrastructure improvements to serve this project are located in the immediate area and will be extended based on the recommended Conditions of Approval. Extending Kirk Court to the north will not adversely impact surrounding areas nor impact implementation of Section 13.24.070(F) of the Subdivision Ordinance in that flag lots would be required to serve the newly created lots which is not a preferred alternative for Fire Department serve needs. The private street cul-de-sac bulb extension will provide street frontages for the future houses that meet Zoning Code requirements, as prepared. Improvements on Avenue 58 will be guaranteed as required by the City's General Plan Circulation Element at the time the final map is considered pursuant to Section 13.20.100 of the Subdivision Ordinance. Findings C through E - Compliance with the California Environmental Qaulity Act Various environmental studies were prepared for this project, and after careful evaluations, the Historic Preservation Commission and various City Departments have determined that the proposed Map could not have a significant adverse impact on the environment provided that recommended mitigation is required pursuant to Environmental Assessment 2001-415. 43 024 Resolution No. 2002- TTM 29963, Baumann Family Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 3 Finding F - Public Health Concerns The design of the proposed subdivision map and related improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, in that responsible agencies have reviewed the project for these issues with no significant concerns identified. The health, safety and welfare of current and future residents can be assured based on the recommended conditions, which serve to implement mitigation measures for the project. Site improvements comply with City requirements, provided on -site water retention is handled on the private lots, or a common basin. Dust control measures shall be required during any further on -site construction work as required by Chapter 6.16 of the Municipal Code. The site is physically suitable for the proposed land division, as the area is flat and without physical constraints, and the Map is consistent with other surrounding parcels. Finding G - Site Design (Public Easements) Public easements will be retained and required in order to construct any houses on the proposed lots, ensuring adequate facilities for future homeowners in compliance with Section 13.24.100 of the Subdivision Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of said City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby certify Environmental Assessment 2001-415 in that no significant effects on the environment were identified, provided mitigation measures are met; and 3. That it does hereby approve Tentative Tract Map 29963 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. it20' Resolution No. 2002- TTM 29963, Baumann Family Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 4 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 51h day of February, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOTES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California RESOLUTION NO. 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29963, BAUMANN FAMILY FEBRUARY 5, 2002 GENERAL 1 . Developer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of La Quinta in the event of any legal claim or litigation arising out of the City's approval of TTM 29963 and certification of EA 2001-415. The City of La Quinta shall have the right to select its defense counsel in its sole discretion. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Map approval shall expire and become null and void on February 5, 2004, unless an extension of time is granted according to the requirements of Section 13.12.150 of the Subdivision Ordinance. 3. This tentative tract map, and any Final Map thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code § § 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at http://la-quinta.org. 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearancesfrom the above listed agencies. When the requirements include 4 `t u27 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29963, Baumann Family Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 2 approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 5. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq., and 13.24.170, LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08-DWQ . A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs five (5) acres or more of land, or that disturbs less than five (5) acres of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than five (5) acres of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020, LQMC): 1. Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2. Temporary Sediment Control. 3. Wind Erosion Control. 4. Tracking Control. 5. Non -Storm Water Management. 6. Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All of applicant's erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off site grading being done in relation to this project. F. All approved project BMPs shall be maintained in their proper working order throughout the course of construction, and until all improvements have been accepted by the City. u23 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29963, Baumann Family Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 3 PROPERTY RIGHTS 6. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 7. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Tract Map all private street right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 8. The private street right-of-ways to be retained for private use required for this development include: A. CUL DE SACS 1. Lot "A" - Kirk Court/Coral Mountain Court (Cul-de-sac): Use Riverside County Standard 800 for symmetrical Cul De Sacs. 9. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. 10. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 11. The applicant shall vacate all abutter's right -of -access to public streets and properties from all frontages along such public streets and properties, excepting those access points shown on the Final Map. 12. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 4 ' el �0 023 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29963, Baumann Family Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 4 13. Before the applicant may be permitted to vacate, or abandon, any existing right- of-way, or access easement, which will diminish the access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall submit a proposed alternate right-of-way or access easement to those properties, or shall submit notarized letters of consent from all affected property owners; the final approval of which rests with the City. 14. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the tentative tract map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. FINAL MAP(S) 15. Applicant is not required to refile for a new parcel map number. 16. Prior to the City's approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCAD files of the Final Map that was approved by the City's map checker on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. Such files shall be in a standard AutoCAD format so as to be fully retrievable into a basic AutoCAD program. Where a Final Map was not produced in an AutoCAD format, or produced in a file that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept a raster -image file of such Final Map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 17. The following improvement plans shall be required for this tentative tract map, and prepared to the scale specified: A. On -Site Street Plans (Including Kirk Court to Avenue 58): 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical The street improvement plans shall include permanent traffic control and separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, �►30 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29963, Baumann Family Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 5 mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. B. Grading Plans: 1 IT = 50' Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. "Rough Grading" plans shall include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. 18. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040, LQMC. 19. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City Resolution, the applicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes from the City. 20. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. 43u u 31. Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29963, Baumann Family Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 6 IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 21. Prior to the conditional approval of any Final Map, or the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the future construction of 50% (fifty percent) of the improvements of the half width of Avenue 58, from the intersection of the southerly prolongation of the easterly lot line of lots 3 & 4 with the northerly right-of-way line of Avenue 58 to the intersection of the southerly prolongation of the westerly lot line of lots 1 & 2 with the northerly right-of-way line of Avenue 58; along with the necessary appurtenant pavement transitions. Such half width improvements shall comply with the Primary Arterial street construction standards of the General Plan in effect at the time of approval of this tentative tract map. 22. Prior to the conditional approval of any Final Map, or the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall either fully construct and satisfy its obligations for same, or furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of Lot "A" (Kirk Court/Coral Mountain Court Cul-de-sac). 23. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this tentative tract map, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28, LQMC. 24. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 25. Depending on the timing of the development of this tentative tract map, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: (1) construct certain off -site improvements, (2) construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others, (3) reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this tentative tract map, (4) secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others, or (5) to agree to any combination of these means, as the City may require. !'1r 4 3 'l 032 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29963, Baumann Family Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 7 In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 26. Prior to any conditional approval of the Final Map by the City Council, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on - site and off -site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution, or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit costs shall be approved by the City Engineer. At the time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for the conditional approval of the Final Map by the City Council, the applicant shall also submit one copy each of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " reduction of each page of the Final Map, along with a copy of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " Vicinity Map. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates for its own on and off -site improvements. Cost estimates for the security of telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements will not be required. Development -wide improvements shall not be agendized for final acceptance by the City Council until the City has received confirmation from the telephone authority that the applicant has met all the requirements for telephone service to all lots within the development. 27. In the event the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 44 033 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29963, Baumann Family Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 8 GRADING 28. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 29. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 30. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, and C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on the Final Maps that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. 31. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 32. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 33. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor. §Cg Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29963, Baumann Family Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 9 Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 34. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), LQMC, Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03. 35. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. 36. Individual lot retention is approved for Lots 1, 2, 3 & 4. The applicant shall meet the individual -lot retention provisions of Chapter 13.24.120 K, LQMC. UTILITIES 37. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.1 10 (Utilities), LQMC. 38. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 39. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 40. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. 94 L)3- Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29963, Baumann Family Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 10 STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 41. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Off -Site Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally), LQMC, for public streets. 42. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. (Public street improvements shall conform with the City's General Plan in effect at the time of construction.) A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1. Avenue 58 - No improvements are required at this time. However, the applicant shall enter into a secured Subdivision Improvement Agreement for the deferred improvements of 50% (fifty percent) of the half width improvements of Avenue 58 to City Standards as outlined in the General Plan in effect on the date of Council approval of this tentative tract map. B. ON -SITE PUBLIC STREETS 1 . Kirk Court/Coral Mountain Court (Local Street) - Construct 28-foot paved street section, for ultimate 36-foot wide street improvement as measured from gutter flowline to gutter flowline, from south boundary line to Avenue 58. (710-feet ± ). Provide appropriate off -site pavement transition from south boundary line to Kirk Court/Coral Mountain Court. 2. Kirk Court/Coral Mountain Court (Existing Public Cul-de-sac) - Construct improvements similar to Riverside County Standard 800, to conform to existing and proposed right-of-way line, and provide a full 36-foot wide paved throat through the Cul-de-sac. C. ON -SITE PRIVATE STREETS 1. Kirk Court/Coral Mountain Court (Lot "A") (Cul de sac) - Construct per Riverside County Standard 800. 2. Gated entries shall provide for a two -car minimum stacking capacity for inbound traffic; and shall provide for a full turnaround outlet for non -entry accepted vehicles. 44.0 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29963, Baumann Family Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 11 Where a gated entry is proposed, the applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a 1 " = 10' scale, demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry can safely make a "U" Turn back out onto Kirk Court/Coral Mountain Court from the gated entry. Two lanes of traffic shall be provided at the entry gate side, one lane for residents, and one lane for visitors. 43. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential 3.0" a.c./4.50" c.a.b. Primary Arterial 4.5 "/6.00" or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 44. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Primary Entry (Avenue 58): Full turn in, Full turn out. 45. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 46. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 47. Standard corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #805, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. CONSTRUCTION 48. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphaltic concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include the test results for all specimens used in the mix 44 1 037 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29963, Baumann Family Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 12 design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include the most recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that the design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs have been approved. LANDSCAPING 49. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscape Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscape Plans), LQMC. 50. The applicant shall provide estimates for the landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas in the secured Subdivision Improvement Agreement for the deferred improvement of Avenue 58. 51. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit the landscape plans for approval by the Community Development Department (CDD), prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking has been completed by CDD, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner, prior to submittal for signature by the City Engineer. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 52. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. 53. The developer and subsequent property owner shall continuously maintain all required landscaping in a healthy and viable condition as required by Section 9.60.240 (E3) of the Zoning Ordinance. 54. Trees shall be staked with 1.5-inch diameter lodge poles to protect against damage from gusting winds. 44 033 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29963, Baumann Family Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 13 55. Prior to building permit issuance, a front yard landscape plan shall be prepared for each homesite to include a minimum of two shade trees 0 5 gallon with 0.75 caliper), five ten-gallon shrubs, and groundcover. QUALITY ASSURANCE 56. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 57. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 58. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that the construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. 59. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. MAINTENANCE 60. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 61. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. FEES AND DEPOSITS 62. The applicant shall pay the City's established fees for plan checking and construction inspection. Fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan checking and permits. 17. 440 033 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29963, Baumann Family Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 14 63. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. 64. The developer shall pay school mitigation fees to the Coachella Valley Unified School District based on their requirements. Fees shall be paid prior to building permit issuance by the City. 65. Within ten days of Planning Commission's decision for TTM 29963, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Community Development Department a check made out to the County of Riverside in the amount of $64.00 to permit the filing and posting of EA 2001-415 (DeMinimus) after final review by the City Council. FIRE DEPARTMENT 66. Applicant/developer will furnish one blueline copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review and approval. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system will meet the fire flow requirements. Plans will be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." 67. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. 68. The minimum dimensions for fire apparatus access roads entering and exiting this project shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet in each direction and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13'-8". Parking is permitted on one side of roadways with a minimum width of 28 feet. Parking is permitted on both sides of the roadways with a minimum width of 36 feet. 69. The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 1,500 g.p.m. and an actual fire flow available from anyone hydrant will be 1,000 g.p.m. for a two-hour duration at 20 psi. residual operating pressure. Minimum thrust velocities shall not exceed 10 feet per second. 44r u43 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 29963, Baumann Family Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 15 70. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in the middle of streets directly in line with fire hydrants. 71. Applicant/developer will provide written certification from the appropriate water company that the required fire hydrant(s) are either existing or that financial arrangements have been made to provide them. MISCELLANEOUS 72. All public agency letters received for this case are made part of the case file documents for plan checking purposes. 73. Custom house design guidelines shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission per Section 9.60.340 of the Zoning Ordinance. 74. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC and R's) for the project shall be submitted to the City Attorney for review and approval concurrently with review of the Final Tract Map. Recordation of the CC and R's is required. 443 041, RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A STREET NAME CHANGE FOR KIRK COURT TO CORAL MOUNTAIN COURT CASE NO.: STREET NAME CHANGE 2001-013 APPLICANT: DR. BRUCE R. BAUMANN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 51h day of February, 2002, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a street name change for Kirk Court to Coral Mountain Court, pursuant to Section 14.08.1 10 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, concurrently with review of Tentative Tract Map 29963, more particularly described as: Street Lots A through D of Parcel Map 8834 Portion of Section 21, T6S, R7E, SBBM WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 13th day of November, 2001, 11 th day of December, 2001, and 8th day of January, 2002, hold duly noticed public hearings to consider a street name change for Kirk Court to Coral Mountain Court (previously noted as Coral Mountain Drive), pursuant to Section 14.08.1 10 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, and recommended approval to the City Council by adoption of Resolution 2002-003; and WHEREAS, said street name change consideration has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended by City Council Resolution 83-68, in that the Community Development Department has determined that the proposed street name change is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1 c) of the Guidelines and no further review is deemed necessary; and WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify approval of Street Name Change 2001- 013: 1 . Due to the landowner controlling two of the four lots fronting onto Kirk Court, an unimproved public street established under Parcel Map 8834 in 1980; 2. Changing the street name will not create confusion for the public or hinder emergency response based on written responses for Tentative Tract Map 29963 and Street Name Change 2001-013; and 3. No written letters of protest were received from adjacent property owners who have been mailed a copy of the public notice concurrently with the posting of Tentative Tract Map 29963. 4411 042 Resolution No. 2002- Street Name Change 2001-013 Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; and 2. That the City Council does hereby approve Street Name Change 2001-013, renaming Kirk Court to Coral Mountain Court per Exhibit "A". PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 51h day of February, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 45� �r43 EXHIBIT A PGA West Resort 20 ts20a is j TRA 020-060 FREE 19m m w coos aao 0a TRA 00040 rM74" TRA 020-073 PAR 1 w PAR T PAR 2 o F:o =o s 445ACGR 4.65ACGR 10 03 AC GR 4163 AC NT 4 54 AC NT 11 12 13 14 Ia0 a2 =038 78 AC 9 78 AC 9 79 AC 19 55 AC aa202 I mw PAR 3 < a PAR 4 w PAR I I PARS n R O IO = I = w 4 63 AC I 4 03AC .11 AC a Ac co1 North I 4.11 Ac NT 4 et AC NT II 33001 I I a7Drr219M nr7 vs aaom G e DATA: P9 19 6-27 O PY 19VI-2 Site 766 d% I CASE MAP CASE Nm STREET NAME CHANGE 2001-013 KIRK COURT TO CORAL MOUNTAIN COURT nesb TRA 22 020-M TRA 020-073 0 19 e4 AC C 15 25 I 8 88 AC DU 10/77 DADPCI IIAD NA 077 NORTH SCALE: WTA, 21 28 044 Attachment 1 • rd Chub rt a peso GP �ae5t ' r 20 19203 1 4 L , TRA 02"60 rM 1sm Leo a T TRA 020-073 I PAR 1 1 P 10 03 AC OR4 6R .n6 A 4U Location 11 1 r! 13 8 78 AC »oot (I ac 0 78 AC 8 78 AC sabot 1 PAR < o PAR PAR 1 ( PAR ! 9 10 O 1 1 O `SAC _ GR 8 ACGR 4 63 AC 1 1 4 63 AC 4.11 AC NT 4 81 AC NT 11 1 1 Exhibit A Ot001 �MII »n7 7 M »o m — - we, 1-1 Cases: TTM 29963 and SNC 2001-013 Kirk Court to Coral Mountain * Court - f, CASE MAP CASE No. Street Name Change 2 001 -01 3 NORTH SCALE: NTS n 40 .. o. Attachment 2 �y.i.ri�ilfL;;i G f1 I Q Q 44 � w 11 • 1 r' A rAw Attachment 3 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 Facilities and Commercial as s Div a County Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment #1 to ensi esidential, Medium Density Residential, Major Co y Facilit' eighborhood and Community Commercial; B) Fro iculture to Density Residential for the area bounded by AV 8, Monroe et, Avenue 60 and Madison Street, outside of R' a County S is Plan No. 218, Amendment #1; Q Change t ing from: A) rside County designation Specific Plan as sho Riverside Co pecific Plan No. 218, Amendment #1 to Low ity Residential dium Density Residential, Golf Course, Major C unity Facilities , ighborhood and Community Commercial; B. Agriculture to Density Residential and Golf Course Bounded by enue 58, Mon r treet, Avenue 60 and Madison Street, outside of Riverside Count ecific Plan No. 218, Amendment # e property bounded by A e 58, Monroe Street, Avenu on Street. Also, a por ' of the area east of Monr betwe venue 69 and Aven 1. 1. irman Abels ask e motion to co a to January 22, 02. 2. It was mo nd seconded by missioners Kirk/Tyler to a continu applications to J y 22, 2002. Unanimously appr. I. HEnvirgd[Wtal Assessment 2022IW3b. General Flan Amendment IUUI - d Zone Chan 0r5 and Specific Plan 20 1-0 5 - "The atewav"; a request of t y of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency for review of a General P Amendment and Zone Chan ".m High Density Residential Medium Density Resid Tourist Commercial and re of development stand esign guidelines for Tourist Comm I uses including ho retail -related uses, and residential dev ment includin ouses and single family residences for property to the southeast corner of Miles Avenue and hington S 1. Chair ened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. 2. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to continue this application to January 22, 2002. Unanimously approved. B. Continued - Environmental Assessment 2001-415 Tentative Tract Map 04.3 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 3 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 29963 and Street Name Change 2001-013; a request of Dr. & Mrs. Bruce Baumann for certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact; subdivision of approximately 9.1 acres into four single family and one street lot for the property located at the terminus of Kirk Court, north of Avenue 48. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked which school district the land was within. Staff stated it was within the CVUSD. Commissioner Tyler asked the significance of the 50-foot easement lines shown around each lot. Commissioner Robbins clarified they were building setback lines. 3. Commissioner Robbins asked that the map be amended to remove the irrigation line hooking up to a sewer line. 4. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. David Turner, Coachella Valley Engineers representing the applicant asked for clarification on Conditions #8 and #21. Kirk Court is current a public street and they intend to leave the right-of-way as it is; just the extension where it will be gated will be private. In regard to Condition #21, Security Agreements, they are building a full 28 feet on Kirk Court and will have no property adjoining Avenue 58 and they request this condition be removed. Same with Condition #22 which requires them to build - full width improvements for Kirk Court and they would like it to read, "construct 28 foot width of pavement." Mr. Turner stated that in the future it will be 36 feet, they are proposing 28 feet to be built now to allow two way traffic and the rest of the improvements would be.developed when the adjacent property owners develop their land. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated if this entire 20 acres were being developed they would all have to participate in the full cost of the improvements. Since only half is participating, the City is asking them to bond for their half now, so the funding is available when the street is built. With respect to Kirk Court, 45--) G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-8-02.wpd 4 043 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 staff is asking for two lanes of travel, or 28 feet, and the balance of the improvements will be added .when the remainder parcels are developed. In regard to Condition #22 staff is asking them to either fully construct or satisfy its obligation. Staff is not asking for full street improvements, but that the condition is fully satisfied. 5. Commissioner Butler asked if it was customary to ask the applicant to bond for 50% of the improvements on a street that is adjacent to. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated yes, they have a burden for 50% of the cost. The City needs security and there are different ways of accomplishing this other than bonding, such as a lien. Mr. Turner stated they volunteered to develop the 28 feet coming into the site because they are developing 75% of the street improvements for Kirk Court. This will leave eight feet of pavement, curb and gutter to be installed. They thought the adjacent five -acre property owners on Avenue 58 should bond or develop the remainder of the street improvements. They are building 28 feet of the ultimate 36 feet for Kirk Court. This is more than their 50% share. They are building more of Kirk Court which should be a trade off. If this was allowed they would also ask that Condition #42.A. be deleted. 6. Commissioner Robbins stated he disagreed with Mr. Turner in regard to the amount of the costs as they were not doing all the curb and gutter to the next developer. Mr. Turner stated they will grade it and all they will have to do is the curb and gutter. 7. Commissioner Tyler asked what portion of the 20 acre parcel was owned by Dr. Baumann. Mr. Turner stated only the rear ten acres. Commissioner Tyler asked about the right-of-way on Kirk Court and whether or not it was a private street. Mr. Turner stated Kirk Court is a public street and indicated on the map where they were intending to construct a gate creating a private street to serve the four parcels. 8. There being no further public comment, the public participation portion of the hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 9. Commissioner Robbins stated he has no problem changing the condition to allow them only to construct the 28 feet, but agrees with staff in regard to the bonding. ^ G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-8-02.wpd 5 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 C. 10. Commissioners Kirk, Butler, and Tyler agreed. 1 1. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-001, recommending Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-415, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 12. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-002, recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 29963, as submitted. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 13. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-003 recommending to the City Council that a public hearing be held to consider Street Name Change 2001-013. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Map 30092; a Environmental As into 130 sing) corner of e information c in the Comm Properties for certification of an division of approximately 38.4 acres ommon lots located at the northwest Chairman Abels asked if there were u Commissioner Tyler asked if this was withi Influence. Community Development Director r the staff esented the which is on file V �M • s Sphere of Jerry Herman 4:57 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 6 051. AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 5, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE• STUDY SESSION: Public Hearing to Certify Environmental Assessment C 2001-417 (Revised) and Approve Tentative Tract Map PUBLIC HEARING: J 30092 (Amendment #1), A Request to Subdivide 38.4 Acres into 130 Single Family Lots (Formerly 97 Single Family Lots) Located at the Northwest Corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street Applicant: Barton Properties, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to certify a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact (EA 2001-417, Revised); and 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to approve Tentative Tract Map 30092 (Amendment #1), subject to findings and conditions. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Property History The vacant property, located at the northwest corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street, was annexed into the City on November 30, 2001. On July 3, 2001, the City Council certified a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approved a 97-lot residential subdivision for this property by adoption of Resolutions 2001-91 and 2001-92, allowing typical lot sizes of 1 10' wide by 1 19' long (13,090 square feet) fronting onto private streets with site access occurring on Avenue 58 and emergency only access allowed on Monroe Street (Attachments 1 and 2) . 458 Project Request This Map Amendment proposes 130 single family lots on private streets measuring 36 feet wide (curb to curb), an increase of 33 lots over the original plan. Typical lot sizes are 70' wide by 121.5' long (8,505 square feet) and larger depending on location within the development (Attachment 3). Project access, via private street connections, occur on Avenue 58 and Monroe Street. Access gating on Street Lot "J", where it intersects with Monroe Street, is restricted to emergency use only, while Avenue 58 access is for residents and guests. The internal street system design has been revised so that cul-de-sac streets are on the west half of the development while interconnecting through streets serve approximately 70 percent of the proposed lots. Other project changes are the elimination of clubhouse facilities and the relocation of the retention basin to the perimeter of the project (Lot 131). A CVWD well site (Lot 132) and temporary lift station (Lot 49) are sited at two locations on Monroe Street. Parkway Lots "A" through "C" on the tract's south and east boundary are being established for landscaping, meandering sidewalks and a multi -use trail as required by the General Plan Circulation Element and Subdivision Ordinance. Easements for utility improvements are shown on the Map exhibit as well, including 10-foot wide easements on each side of all private streets. Planning Commission Review On January 8, 2002, the Planning Commission, on a 5-0 vote, adopted Resolutions 2002-004 and 2002-005, recommending to the City Council certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of Tentative Tract Map 30092 (Amendment #1), subject to findings and conditions (Attachment 4 - Minutes). Public Notice This project was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on January 23, 2002, and mailed to all property owners within 500-feet of the site. To date, no comments have been received from adjacent property owners. Any written comments received will be handed out at the meeting. Agency Comments A copy of this request has been sent to all applicable public agencies and City Departments. All written comments received are on file with the Community Development Department. Applicable comments received have been included in the recommended Conditions of Approval. 4� 002 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The findings necessary to approve this request can be made, and are included in the attached Resolutions. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to certify a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact (EA 2001-417, Revised), and Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to approve Tentative Tract Map 30092 (Amendment #1), subject to findings and conditions; or 2. Do not approve the above -mentioned Resolutions; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Approved Tract Map Exhibit 2. July 3, 2001 City Council Minutes (Excerpt) 3. Proposed Tract Map Exhibit 4. January 8, 2002, Planning Commission Minutes (Excerpt) RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30092, AMENDMENT #1 CASE NO.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-417, REVISED APPLICANT: BARTON PROPERTIES, INC. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 51r, day of February, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for Environmental Assessment 2001-417 for Tentative Tract Map 30092 (Amendment #1) located at the northwest corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street, more particularly described as follows: APN: 761-720-020 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 11 to day of December, 2001, and 8t" day of January, 2002, hold duly noticed Public Hearings for Environmental Assessment 2001-417 for Tentative Tract Map 30092 (Amendment #1) and on a 5-0 vote, adopted Resolution 2002-004 recommending certification to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the V day of July, 2001, adopt Resolution 2001-91 certifying Environmental Assessment 2001-417 for TTM 30092, a 97-lot single family subdivision with private streets in a RL Zoning District; and WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study (EA 2001-417, Revised) and has determined that although the proposed residential development could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because appropriate mitigation measures were made a part of the assessment and included in the conditions of approval and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed; and WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to certify said Environmental Assessment: 4 1). OC4 Resolution No. 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-417 for TTM 30092, Amendment #1 Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 2 1. The proposed Tentative Tract Map Amendment will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2001-417. 2. The proposed Tentative Tract Map Amendment will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 4. The proposed Tentative Tract Map Amendment does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. 5. The proposed Tentative Tract Map Amendment will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. 6. The proposed Tentative Tract Map Amendment will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 8. The City Council has considered the Environmental Assessment 2001-417 and the Environmental Assessment reflects the independent judgment of the City. 46 P:\GREG\EA ccResoTTM30092#1.wpd UI:J Resolution No. 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-417 for TTM 30092, Amendment #1 Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 3 9. The City has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 10. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitutes the findings of the City Council for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby recommend certification of Environmental Assessment 2001-417 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist on file in the Community Development Department. 3. That Environmental Assessment 2001-417 reflects the independent judgment of the City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 5t" day of February, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PEIVA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California P:\GREG\EA ccResoTTM30092#1.wpd 4 6 '7 V 0co Resolution No. 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-417 for TTM 30092, Amendment #1 Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 4 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California P:\GREG\EA ccResoTTM30092#1.wpd 7 6� UO REVISED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-417 1 . Project Title: TTM 30092 (Barton Properties) 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Greg Trousdell 760-777-7125 4. Project Location: NW Corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe St. 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Barton Properties, 11611 San Vicente Blvd., S-605, Los Angeles, CA 90049 (310-826-4658) 6. General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential 7. Zoning: Low Density Residential 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Original application involved development of 97 single family and common lots on 37 acres at the northwest corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street. Application has been modified to include 130 residential lots of about 8,000 square feet each. The application also includes lettered lots for streets, a well, and a retention basin. 9. Surrounding Lane Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings. North: Vacant (previously agriculture) South: Across Ave. 58, date palm grove and residential East: Across Monroe St., vacant and scattered residential West: IID Corporate facility 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) 1 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD 1 U Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology and Soils Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared F0- I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. FE I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 10-1 I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. CLo 1? 14 101 ignature 9 Date C Jj4kAj pe—D, CITY OF LA QUINTA Printed ame 46 ()C9 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst:WPD • Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analysis are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The analysis of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance it 1 a G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD 3 • Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: I. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (General Plan Exhibit CIR-5) b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (General Plan EIR, page 5-12 ff.) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials) AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES:. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Dept. Of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29, 5-32) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (Aerial photographs) III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact X X X X FIA X X X X 46�3 U11 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD 4 • • c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Application materials) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Application materials) IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) c) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) Either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (La Quinta Municipal Code; General Plan) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) X 19 12 X X X X X X G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD 5 012 C� J • V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? ("Historical/ Archaeological Resources Survey Report," CRM Tech, 10/18/2000 and Phase 1 Report by A.A.G. dated April 2001. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resources (i.e., an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? ("Historical/ Archaeological Resources Survey Report," CRM Tech, 10/18/2000 and Phase 1 Report by A.A.G. dated April 2001.) c) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? ("Paleontological Resources Assessment Report, CRM Tech, 10/19/2000 and Phase 1 Report by A.A.G. dated April 2001.) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ("Historical/ Archaeological Resources Survey Report," CRM Tech, 10/18/2000 and Phase 1 Report by A.A.G. dated April 2001.) VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.2-3, page 4-35 and Sladden Geotechnical Report dated 2-9-2001) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (General Plan EIR, page 4- 30 ff. and Sladden Geotechnical Report dated 2-9-2001) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff. and Sladden Geotechnical Report dated 2-9-2001) iv) Landslides? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) X P 19 X X X X G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD 6 u13 0 • c) Be located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code 0 994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff. and Sladden Geotechnical Report dated 2-9-2001) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-32) VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Application Materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Application Materials) c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Application Materials) d) Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Riverside County Hazardous Materials Listing) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip; would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-11) h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildlands fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) X X X X X X X X G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD u14 Vill. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-26, 6-27) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (General Plan EIR, page 4-57 ff. and Hacker Engineering Drainage Report for TTM 30092) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR, page 4- 59 ff. and Hacker Engineering Drainage Report for TTM 30092) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on - or off -site? (General Plan EIR, page 4-59 ff. and Hacker Engineering Drainage Report for TTM 30092) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems to control? (General Plan EIR, page 4-59 ff. and Hacker Engineering Drainage Report for TTM 30092) f) Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-13 ) g) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-13) IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Project Description) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local costal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purposes of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan Land Use Element) X X X X X X X X K4 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD 8 �1� X. XI. XII. • c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-5) MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29) NOISE: Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-157 ff. and Noise Impact Report prepared by P.A. Penardi and Assoc. dated 4-4-01) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?(General Plan EIR, p. 4-157 ff.) c) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-157 ff.) d) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Application Materials) e) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive levels? (General Plan map) POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) ? (General Plan, page 2-14) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD 9 12 R., X X X XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff. ) Police protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff. ) Schools? (General Plan MEA, page 4-9 ff. ) Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA, page 4-14 ff. ) XIV. RECREATION: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application Materials) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application Materials) XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-126 ff.) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-126 ff.) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (Application Materials) d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-126 ff.) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Application Materials) X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 l G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD 10 017 • f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Application Materials) g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Application Materials) XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24 ) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, page 4-27) d) Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, page 4- 20) e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, page 4-20) f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?(General Plan MEA, page 4-28) XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? X X X X X X X X X G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD 11 -1 013 c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVII1. EARLIER Analysis. X iQ Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. Environmental Assessments prepared for the County of Riverside were used in reviewing the potential impacts of the proposed project. These include: PP15672, Fast Track #98-39; TTM 29316 & 29317; Environmental Assessment No. 37276, Amd. No 1. City EA 2001-408 covers this site and 240 acres to the north. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. See attached Addendum. SOURCES: Master Environmental Assessment, City of La Quinta General Plan 1992; SCAQMD CEQA Handbook; General Plan, City of La Quinta, 1992; Paleontological Lakebed Delineation Map, City of La Quinta; City of La Quinta Municipal Code; "Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report," prepared by CRM Tech, October 18, 2000; "Paleontological Resources Assessment Report," prepared by CRM Tech, October 19, 2000; "Phase 1 Archaeological/Historic Resources Assessment for TTM 30092", prepared by Archaeological Advisory Group, April 2001; "Noise Report #01 106 for TTM 30092," prepared by P.A. Penardi and Assoc., April 4, 2001; "Geotechnical Investigation for TTM 30092," prepared by Sladden Eng., Feb. 9, 2001; "Preliminary Drainage Calc. - TTM 30092," prepared by Hacker Eng., April 13, 2001. , 0 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD 12 0 1 J Revised Addendum for Environmental Assessment 2001-417 for Tentative Tract Map 30092 Introduction This Environmental Assessment has been prepared to address changes made to Tentative Tract Map 30092. The original application was reviewed under EA 2001- 417, an environmental assessment to supplement EA 2001-408 prepared for General Plan Amendment 2001-074 and Zone Change 2001-098 (City Council Resolution 2001-34). Since the original approval and environmental review, the applicant has increased the number of residential lots from 97 to 130. II. c) The proposed parcel is not currently under Williamson Act contract. Development of the site will result in the loss of land available for agriculture. Residential subdivisions are being developed to the north of the site and the project area is an isolated parcel. Lands to the south and east continue to be farmed. The loss of this site for agriculture is not expected to be significant based on the conclusion of this assessment and EA 2001-408. III. a), c) & d) Air quality in the Coachella Valley and the City is primarily affected by vehicular emissions. The development of this project could generate up to 1,300 average daily trips'. These trips could generate the following emissions. The Table below also includes the SCAQMD thresholds of significance for each potential pollutant. I Running Exhaust Emissions (pounds/day) PM10 PM10 PM10 co ROC NOx Exhaust Brakes Tires 50 mph 67.15 2.58 13.77 -- 0.29 0.29 Daily Threshold' 550 75 100 150 Based on 1,300 trips/day and average trip length of 10.0 miles, using EMFAC7G Model provided by California Air Resources Board. Assumes catalytic light autos at 75°F. * Operational thresholds provided by SCAOMD for assistance in determining the significance of a project. "Trip Generation, 6th Edition, Volume P prepared by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Single Family detached housing (2I0) used. 4 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\ Barton RevAdd.WPD 1 v 2 0 The Coachella Valley is a non -attainment area for PM10 (particulate matter of 10 microns or smaller). The non -attainment status results in potentially significant impacts associated with new development, particularly during the construction of new projects. In order to control PM 10, the City has imposed standards and requirements on development to control dust. In addition to these standards, SCAQMD suggests mitigation for PM 10, which are integrated into the following mitigation measures: 1. No earth moving activity shall be undertaken without the review and approval of a PM 10 Management Plan. 2. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. 3. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation. 4. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 5. Cut and fill quantities will be balanced on site, unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer. 6. Any piece of land to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. 7. Watering of any portion of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an ongoing basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Any portion of the site that is actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. 8. All disturbed areas shall be treated to prevent erosion until the site is constructed upon. Pad sites which are to remain undeveloped shall be seeded with either a desert wildflower mix, grass seed or chemical stabilizers. 9. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. 10. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean up of construction -related dirt on approach routes to the site. 11. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second staff ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonRevAdd.WPD 2 u21 With the implementation of these mitigation measures, the impacts to air quality from the proposed project will not be significant. IV. a) Biological resource analysis has not been performed because the site has been actively used for farm activities and therefore is not likely to be a valuable habitat for native species. The land is not in an area of concern for known sensitive species and is outside the boundary of the Coachella Valley Fringe - toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan. The changes associated with the application will not change the potential impacts to biological resources. Impacts from development are not expected to be significant. V. a) & b) Cultural resource surveys were conducted for the subject property2. The survey found that no significant resources occur on the site. V. c) The site has been previously assessed for paleontologic resources'. The area was within the historic lakebed of ancient Lake Cahuilla, but no vertebrate remains have been located. The mollusks found are abundant in this area, and do not represent a significant resource. As such, the on -site investigation and report found that the impacts on paleontologic resources are less than significant, and that no further analysis of the site is necessary. VI. a) i) & ii) The site is not located in any Earthquake Fault zones as designated by the State and is mapped in the Ground Shaking Zone IV. To ensure structures can withstand damage from earthquakes, compliance with the Geotechnical Investigation Report by Sladden Engineering dated February 9, 2001, and any other site specific soil analysis required by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits shall be required. This requirement will ensure that impacts from ground failure are reduced to a less than significant level. VI. a) iii) This site maybe subject to liquefaction due to groundwater being found within 25 to 30 feet requiring "remedial grading including overexcavation and recompaction." (Sladden Report). The modification of the application does not 2 3 Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey, prepared by CR.M Tech, October, 2000; Phase 1 Archaeological/Historical Survey, prepared by James Brock, MA, RPA dated April 2001. Paleontological Resources Assessment Report, prepared by CRM Tech, October 2000. Environmental Assessments prepared for the County of Riverside. These include: PP15672, Fast Track 498-39; TTM 29316 & 29317; Environmental Assessment No. 37276, Amd. No 1. These analyses cover 200 of the 280 acres proposed for this project. i% G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonRevAdd.WPD 3 U affect this potential impact, and requires equivalent mitigation as the previous application. To develop the site, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1. Grading activities and structure development shall comply with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Investigation Report prepared by Sladden Engineering for TTM 30092 including over -excavation, and other methods known to- reduce the potential for liquefaction impacts on residential structures. Vill. b) Domestic water is provided by the Coachella Valley Water District, which extracts groundwater from a number of wells in the Lower Thermal sub -basin. Development of the site will replace the use of canal water for crop irrigation and may represent a positive impact insofar as water usage may be reduced when agricultural irrigation no longer occurs on the site. The proposed amendment to the project will increase water usage over that previously analyzed. Stormwater generated by development will be retained on -site which will encourage percolation and groundwater recharge. The proposed alteration to the project does not change the City's requirements for on -site retention. Additionally, City Ordinances require water conserving plumbing fixtures and landscaping. These standards will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. Vlll. c)-e) Site development of buildings and parking areas will create impermeable surfaces creating drainage pattern changes. The project site is located in a C Flood Zone. The project is required to meet the City's standards for retention of the 100-year storm on -site. The revised drainage plan, prepared by Hacker Engineering, has, been reviewed by the City Engineer for compliance with Section 1 3.24.120 (Drainage) of the Subdivision Ordinance. Tract conditions are recommended to ensure compliance assuring the flood control system is less than significant. XI. a) The development of the area will result in increased noise levels, but these are not expected to be significant, given that the ambient noise level is, and will continue to be low. Development on any portion of the site will include landscaping, berms and walls which will further attenuate sound in the area as required by Noise Impact Report prepared by P.A. Penardi and Associates dated April 4, 2001. Amendment of the application will not change the potential impacts associated with noise. The impacts from noise are therefore not expected to be significant. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\ Bart onRevAdd.WPD 4 u 2 3 • • XIII. a) The proposed development will have a direct impact on public services and will be served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, acting under City contract. Site development will generate property tax which will offset the costs of added police and fire services. The project area will continue to pay the mandated school fees as development occurs. These fees mitigate the students generated, and offset the impacts to schools. XV. a) The collection of property tax, and the generation of sales tax from these residents' disposable income, will generate revenues to the City to offset the added costs associated with the provision of municipal services. Builders within the project area will be required to participate in the City's Impact Fee Program, which helps to offset roadway improvement costs. The amendment of the application will not significantly change the impacts to public services. Increases in population resulting from the increased number of lots will be offset by increased revenues in property and sales tax. Site development is not expected to have a significant impact on municipal services or facilities. The Village of the Palms project determined traffic impacts for development would be less than significant". Under EA 2001-408 (City Council Resolution No. 2001-34) it was determined that a traffic study would not be required, provided the sites were developed to comply with the LDR General Plan designation and Impact Mitigation Fees were paid. The amendment of the application will add only 330 trips per day to the regional road system. The application, as amended, still falls within the Low Density Residential land use category. The implementation of these mitigation measures will reduce the potential impacts to the circulation system to a less than significant level. XVI. a)-f) The buildout of the site will require service from utility providers. The overall impacts on these services is not expected to be significant, insofar as these suppliers will charge the residents for their services, and provide improvements to these services as needed. In addition, connection fees will be required at construction of any project. These fees and charges will mitigate the potential impacts to a less than significant level. a Environmental Assessments prepared for the County of Riverside. These include: PP15672, Fast Track 498-39; TTM 293 l 6 & 29317; Environmental Assessment No. 37276, Amd. No 1. 4 Q -a C7 , j G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonRevAdd.WPD 5 024 0 0 0 i rl kn A U z .. 0 0 a U O a N 0 M F U94 zd' A aU �W Ox UU ►� too a cd b bo b Cd 4-4 0 O .� O •r. t O 4-4O U U � 4-1 U U r. Cd � ti �..+ ZZ 0 0 o h .� U U .� *.a a v v O 4 v �O 0 b aaa. waan a4-1 .� � as o 00 C7 E4 o a U A 0 > z z 00 �: .� �° ' ono Cd c W � W W "0 U A U U U V GA U A O-cz o E+ G a 0 •� E cl a � O O r. o 0 Ucl 4) a Ow U ~ 55 CO :-a N 3 &p 'C cz a a1 a U a a 3 rz 02 c� F �A w �W ox VV o Ln 0-4 -d O cd U z o cj c oio z H co U cw G a Q b G cz a oz z 0.4 0 �p a > zz QQ �3 x Ua G 0 aQ 0-4� o o> U 0cz z� z� ~w a� aW aW Ox CV VV V -b an 0 U � U 4� • � -d ., G � o a o a� � O z az =+ U cz O too aA o o o"d o'tio o� a as .c a a a x x �� z~ cl a W>, a, u Q U as V A d 42 ' a ,.., d� � 0 � �W 0 "o � �cl c� r.; d -o a c O tf cc N W U 0 0 IL H U� z0.0 W aU �W ox UU 0-4 0.0 U cl a a� c �7 0 r. H co 0 a c. O w� as � Or cz W p� to c b G4 O E 0-4 H cz � b.4 z W w a ~� w a W � a ►'� a a r%i 0.0 W U �C a F U� ZA aU �W ox UV U O � ab v� a G7 z c a� a � o E� > b c4 'G A a Wz 0 a 99 a o �O z� � a � a VA O Cd s z cd U a 0-4o .� w .- C cd 4 o Z Gz] 3 a o ` "4119 Cd COD 027 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REVISED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 130 SINGLE FAMILY (FORMERLY 97 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS) AND OTHER STREET, PUBLIC UTILITY AND COMMON LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 38.4 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MONROE STREET CASE: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30092, AMENDMENT #1 APPLICANT: BARTON PROPERTIES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 51n day of February, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Barton Properties for Charles and Norma Fausel for amendment to 130 single family and other miscellaneous common/utility lots on approximately 38.4 acres located at the northwest corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 1 1 to day of December, 2001, and 8tn day of January, 2002, hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider Tentative Tract Map 30092 (Amendment #1), and on a 5-0 vote, adopted Resolution 2002-005 recommending approval to the City Council, more particularly described as: Assessor's Parcel No.: 761-720-020 Southwest 1 /4 of Section 22, T6S, R7E, SBBM WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 3rd day of July, 2001, approve Tentative Tract Map 30092, a single family development of 97 lots and other miscellaneous common lots by adoption of Resolution 2001-92, on a 5-0 vote; and WHEREAS, the Tentative Tract Map has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (City Council Resolution 83-63), in that the Community Development Department has prepared a revised Environmental Assessment for this Map Amendment. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact (EA 2001- 417) was certified by the City Council on July 3, 2001, under Resolution 2001-091. There are no changed circumstances, conditions, or new information which would trigger the preparation of a subsequent environmental assessment pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21 166; and WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Tentative Tract Map Amendment: 48%) u23 Resolution No. 2002- TTM 30092 (Amendment #1), Barton Properties Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 2 1. The proposed Tentative Tract Map Amendment is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, in that the subdivision will result in the creation of 8,500 + sq. ft. residential lots to be developed in accordance with the existing Pre -Annexation Zoning (Low Density Residential) and General Plan (Low Density Residential) designations as established. Project density is approximately 3.6 units per acre within the allowed maximum density of four dwelling units per acre. Tract access for residents is limited to 58t" Avenue, a Primary Arterial thoroughfare. 2. The design and improvements for the Tentative Tract Map Amendment are consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, in that all proposed single family lots meet and exceed minimum required dimensions and sizes requirements and perimeter Arterial streets will be constructed. The design of private streets servicing the residential lots are consistent with standards as contained in the General Plan Circulation Element (Chapter 3.0) and Subdivision Ordinance (Title 13). 3. The design of the Map, and its proposed improvements, are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, or substantially and unavoidable injure fish or wildlife, or their habitat, in that the site is vacant and has been previously disturbed by farming activity, to the degree that the site itself does not support any wildlife species. 4. The design of the proposed subdivision map and related improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, in that responsible agencies have reviewed the project for these issues with no significant concerns identified. Necessary infrastructure improvements for this project are readily accessible. The health, safety and welfare of current and future residents can be assured based on the recommended conditions, which serve to implement mitigation measures for the project, including emergency only access on Monroe Street. To contain on -site stormwater, a retention basin has been proposed at the southeast corner of the project. Site grading is consistent with adjacent parcels and any on -site work will require dust control measures pursuant to Chapter 6.16 of the Municipal Code. 5. The design of, and type of improvements for, the Map will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the subdivision, as the proposed subdivision has been reviewed for these issues with no concerns identified. The Tract's design includes provisions for lot access and utility and other public easements as determined necessary during review of the proposal. Landscape lots adjacent to perimeter 4 023 Resolution No. 2002- TTM 30092 (Amendment #1), Barton Properties Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 3 arterial streets will provide aesthetic and traffic noise buffers in compliance with City requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of said City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby confirm the conclusion that Environmental Assessment 2001-417 (Revised) assessed the environmental concerns of this Map; and 3. That it does hereby recommend approval of the above -described Tentative Tract Map 30092 (Amendment #1), for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 5tn day of February, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 48 030 Resolution No. 2002- TTM 30092 (Amendment #1), Barton Properties Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 4 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 480" 031 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30092 (AMENDMENT #1), BARTON PROPERTIES FEBRUARY 5, 2002 GENERAL 1 . Tentative Tract Map 30092 (Amendment #1) shall comply with the requirements and standards of § § 66410-66499.58 of the California Government Code (the Subdivision Map Act) and Title 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) unless otherwise modified by the following conditions. 2. This Map approval shall expire and become null and void on the original approval date of July 3, 2003, unless an extension of time is granted according to the requirements of Section 13.12.150 of the Subdivision Ordinance. 3. Developer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of La Quinta in the event of any legal claim or litigation arising out of the City's approval of TTM 30092 (Amendment #1) and certification of EA 2001-417. The City of La Quinta shall have the right to select its defense counsel in its sole discretion. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 4. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit for construction of any building or use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances from the following agencies and departments: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (NPDES Permit) The applicant is responsible for any requirements of the permits or clearances from those jurisdictions. If the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of said approvals prior to obtaining City approval of the plans. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit. Projects disturbing five or more acres, or smaller projects which are part of a larger project disturbing five or more acres requir �j q 18"') 032 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommneded TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 2 a project -specific NPDES permit. The applicant shall submit a copy of the CWQCB acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent (NOI) prior to issuance of a grading or site construction permit. The applicant shall ensure that the required Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (SWPPP) is available for inspection at the project site. PROPERTY RIGHTS 5. Prior to approval of a final map, the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights required of the tentative map or otherwise necessary for construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of essential improvements. 6. The applicant shall dedicate or grant public and private street right of way and utility easements in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and as required by the City Engineer. 7. Right of way dedications required of this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Avenue 58 (Primary Arterial) - 55-foot half of 1 10-foot right of way. 2) Monroe Street (Primary Arterial) - 55-foot half of 1 10-foot right of way. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Main Entry: As required for final configuration of the private gated entry as approved by the City Engineer. 2) Residential: 37-foot width. Width may be reduced to 33 feet with parking restricted to one side and 29 feet if on -street parking is prohibited provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors and the applicant makes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the restrictions. 49rt 033 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommneded TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 3 C. CULS DE SAC - Public or Private: Use Riverside County Standard 800 (symmetric) or 800A (offset) with 39.5-foot radius, or larger. 8. Right of way geometry for knuckle turns and corner cutbacks shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805 respectively unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 9. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 10. If the City Engineer determines that access rights to proposed street rights of way shown on the tentative map are necessary prior to approval of final maps dedicating the rights of way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights of way within 60 days of written request by the City. 1 1 . The applicant shall dedicate ten -foot public utility easements contiguous with and along both sides of all private streets. The easements may be reduced to five feet with the express concurrence of IID. 12. The applicant shall create perimeter setbacks along public rights of way as follows (listed setback depth is the average depth if meandering wall design is approved): A. Avenue 58 (Primary Arterial) - 20-feet B. Monroe Street (Primary Arterial) - 20-feet The setback requirement applies to all frontage including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks, multi -use trails) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall dedicate blanket easements for those purposes. 13. The applicant shall dedicate easements necessary for placement of and access to utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 14. The applicant shall vacate abutter's rights of access to public streets and properties from all frontage along the streets and properties except access points shown on the approved tentative map. 4. u034 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommneded TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 4 15. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements or written permission, as appropriate, from owners of any abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments are to occur. 16. If the applicant proposes vacation or abandonment of any existing rights of way or access easements which will diminish access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall provide approved alternate rights of way or access easements to those properties or notarized letters of consent from the property owners. 17. The applicant shall cause no easements to be granted or recorded over any portion of this property between the date of approval of this tentative map by the City Council and the date of recording of any final map(s) covering the same portion of the property unless such easements are approved by the City Engineer. FINAL MAP(S) AND PARCEL MAP(S) 18. Prior to approval of a final map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete map, as approved by the City's map checker, on storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu items so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. If the map was not produced in AutoCad or a file format which can be converted to AutoCad, the City Engineer may accept raster -image files of the map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these conditions of approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 19. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and landscape architects, as appropriate. Plans shall be submitted on 24" x 36" media in the categories of "Rough Grading," "Precise Grading," "Streets & Drainage," and "Landscaping." Precise grading plans shall have signature blocks for Community Development Director and the Building Official. All other plans shall have signature blocks for the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until they are signed. 9n Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommneded TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 5 "Streets and Drainage" plans shall normally include signals, sidewalks, bike paths, entry drives, gates, and parking lots. "Landscaping" plans shall normally include irrigation improvements, landscape lighting and entry monuments. "Precise Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls. Plans for improvements not listed above shall be in formats approved by the City Engineer. 20. The City may maintain standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee established by City resolution, the applicant may acquire standard plan and/or detail sheets from the City. 21. When final plans are approved by the City, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete, approved plans on storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu items so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. At the completion of construction and prior to final acceptance of improvements, the applicant shall update the files to reflect as -constructed conditions. If the plans were not produced in AutoCad or a file format which can be converted to AutoCad, the City Engineer may accept raster -image files of the plans. GRADING 22. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall furnish written acknowledgment from CWQCB of receipt of applicants Notice of Intent (NOI). 23. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall furnish a preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report and an approved grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer. The grading plan shall conform with the recommendations of the soils report and be certified as adequate by a soils engineer or engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on final maps (if any are required of this development) that a soils report has been prepared pursuant to Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code. 49 030 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommneded TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 6 24. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 25. The applicant shall endeavor to minimize differences in elevation at abutting properties and between separate tracts and lots within this development. Building pad elevations on contiguous lots shall not differ by more than three feet except for lots within a tract or parcel map, but not sharing common street frontage, where the differential shall not exceed five feet. The limits given in this condition and the previous condition are not entitlements and more restrictive limits may be imposed in the map approval or plan checking process. If compliance with the limits is impractical, however, the City will consider alternatives which minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 26. Prior to occupation of the project site for construction purposes, the applicant shall submit and receive approval of a fugitive dust control plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. The Applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the city, in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the provisions of the permit. 27. The applicant shall maintain graded, undeveloped land to prevent wind and water erosion of soils. The land shall be planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. 28. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide building pad certifications stamped and signed by qualified engineers or surveyors. For each pad, the certification shall list the approved elevation, the actual elevation, the difference between the two, if any, and pad compaction. The data shall be organized by lot number and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 29. Depending on the timing of development of the lots or parcels created by this map and the status of off -site improvements at that time, the subdivider may be required to construct improvements, to construct additional improvements subject to reimbursement by others, to reimburse others who construct improvements that are obligations of this map, to secure the cost of the improvements for future construction by others, or a combination of these methods. 4 ;14 037 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommneded TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 7 In the event that any of the improvements required herein are constructed by the City, the Applicant shall, at the time of approval of a map or other development or building permit, reimburse the City for the cost of those improvements. 30. The applicant shall construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations, or furnish an executed, secured agreement to construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations required by the City prior to approval of a final map or parcel map or issuance of a certificate of compliance for a waived parcel map. For secured agreements, security provided, and the release thereof, shall conform with Chapter 13, LQMC. Improvements to be made or agreed to shall include removal of any existing structures or obstructions which are not part of the proposed improvements. 31. If improvements are secured, the applicant shall provide estimates of improvement costs for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Estimates shall comply with the schedule of unit costs adopted by City resolution or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's schedule, estimates shall meet the approval of the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies. Security is not required for telephone, gas, or T.V. cable improvements. However, development -wide improvements shall not be agendized for final acceptance until the City receives confirmation from the telephone authority that the applicant has met all requirements for telephone service to lots within the development. 32. If improvements are phased with multiple final maps or other administrative approvals (e.g., Site Development Permits), off -site improvements and common improvements (e.g., retention basins, perimeter walls & landscaping, gates) shall be constructed or secured prior to approval of the first phase unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each phase shall be completed and satisfied prior to completion of homes or occupancy of permanent buildings within the phase and subsequent phases unless a construction phasing plan is approved by the City Engineer. 33. If the applicant fails to construct improvements or satisfy obligations in a timely manner or as specified in an approved phasing plan or in an improvement agreement, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits or .�.� 033 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommneded TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 8 final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. DRAINAGE 34. Applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as required by the State NPDES General Construction Permit. 35. Applicant's SWPPP shall be approved prior to any on or off site grading being done in relation to this project. 36. Applicant's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan shall include provisions for all of the following BMPs: A. Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). B. Temporary Sediment Control. C. Wind Erosion Control. D. Tracking Control. E. Non -Storm Water Management. F. Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. 37. All of applicant's erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be approved prior to any on or off site grading being done in relation to this project. 38. All project BMPs shall be maintained throughout the course of construction, and until all improvements have been accepted by the City. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03 and the following: 39. Stormwater falling on site during the peak 24-hour period of a 100-year storm (the design storm) shall be retained within the development unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. 40. Stormwater shall normally be retained in common retention basins. Individual - lot basins or other retention schemes may be approved by the City Engineer for lots 2.5 acres in size or larger or where the use of common retention is impracticable. If individual -lot retention is approved, the applicant shall meet the individual -lot retention provisions of Chapter 13.24, LQMC. 033 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommneded TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 9 41. Storm flow in excess of retention capacity shall be routed through a designated, unimpeded overflow outlet to the historic drainage relief route. 42. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be retained on site or passed through to the overflow outlet. 43. Retention facility design shall be based on site -specific percolation data which shall be submitted for checking with the retention facility plans. The design percolation rate shall not exceed two inches per hour. 44. Retention basin slopes shall not exceed 3:1. Maximum retention depth shall be five feet for common basins and two feet for individual -lot retention. 45. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. In residential developments, nuisance water shall be disposed of in a trickling sand filter and leachfield approved by the City Engineer. The sand filter and leachfield shall be designed to contain surges of 3 gph/1,000 sq. ft. (of landscape area) and infiltrate 5 gpd/1,000 sq. ft. 46. In developments for which security will be provided by public safety entities (e.g., the La Quinta Safety Department or the Riverside County Sheriff's Department), retention basins shall be visible from adjacent street(s). No fence or wall shall be constructed around basins unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 47. If the applicant proposes discharge of stormwater directly or indirectly to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, the applicant shall indemnify the City from the costs of any sampling and testing of the development's drainage discharge which may be required under the City's NPDES Permit or other City - or area -wide pollution prevention program, and for any other obligations and/or expenses which may arise from such discharge. The indemnification shall be executed and furnished to the City prior to issuance of any grading, construction or building permit and shall be binding on all heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors in interest in the land within this tentative map excepting therefrom those portions required to be dedicated or deeded for public use. The form of the indemnification shall be acceptable to the City Attorney. If such discharge is approved for this development, the applicant shall make provisions in the CC&R's for meeting these potential obligations. 49 040 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommneded TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 10 48. The tract shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. UTILITIES 49. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within the right of way and all aboveground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electrical vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 50. Existing aerial lines within or adjacent to the proposed development and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground, unless otherwise allowed by General Plan Amendment 2000-073. Power lines exceeding 34.5 Kv are exempt from this requirement. 51. Utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing, improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of trench compaction for approval of the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 52. The applicant shall install the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. (Public street improvements shall conform with the City's General Plan in effect at the time of construction.) A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Avenue 58 (Primary Arterial) - Construct 43-foot half of 86-foot improvement (measured curb face to curb face) plus 6-foot meandering sidewalk. Applicant shall construct a landscaped half median, unless otherwise determined by the City Engineer. 2) Monroe Street (Primary Arterial) - Construct 43-foot half of 86- foot improvement (measured curb face to curb face) plus 6-foot meandering sidewalk. Applicant shall construct a landscaped half median, unless otherwise determined by the City Engineer. 49 041 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommneded TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 11 3) Developer shall enter into a secured agreement for the deferred installation of a traffic signal at the main entrance off Avenue 58 at such time that signal warrants are met. Developer shall pay its fair share based on an "after the fact" traffic study. Developer may assign secured agreement to the HOA. Signalized intersection costs to be divided based on percentages of use to the participating developments. B. PRIVATE STREETS - Residential: 36-foot travel width. Width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one side and 28 feet with on -street parking prohibited if there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors and the applicant provides for perpetual enforcement of the restrictions by the homeowners association. C. CULS DE SAC - Use Riverside County Standard 800 (symmetric) or 800A (offset) with 38-foot curb radius. D. MULTI -USE TRAIL - The applicant shall construct a multi -use trail along the Avenue 58 frontage within the required 32-foot wide setback. The location and design of the trail shall be approved by the City. A split rail fence shall be constructed to separate the multi -use trail from the pedestrian sidewalk and perimeter wall in accordance with Section 9.140.060 (Item E, 3a) of the Zoning Ordinance. The multi -use trail, trail signs, and the split rail fence shall be completed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the first residence. Bonding for the fence to be installed shall be posted prior to final map approval. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, turn knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, and other features contained in the approved construction plans may warrant additional street widths as determined by the City Engineer. 53. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 54. The applicant may be required to extend improvements beyond development boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). J 4 u42 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommneded TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 12 55. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC, adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, and as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 56. Knuckle turns and corner cutbacks shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805 respectively unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 57. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations which convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue for street sweeping. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be vertical (1 /8" batter) and a minimum of 0.1 ' in height. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to normal curbing prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 58. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using Caltrans' design procedure (20-year life) and site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows (or approved equivalents for alternate materials): Residential Collector Secondary Arterial Primary Arterial Major Arterial 3.0" a.c./4.50" c.a.b. 4.0"/5.00" 4.0"/6.00" 4.5"/6.00" 5.5"/6.50" 59. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 60. The City will conduct final inspections of homes and other habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic �i u43 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommneded TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 13 control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the tract or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. 61. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Avenue 58 (Primary Arterial) - No turning restriction. B. Emergency Access on Monroe Street - No public access allowed; left turns are restricted. LANDSCAPING 62. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots, landscape setback areas and medians shall be prepared by a landscape architect and be prepared based on the water conservation measures in Chapter 8.13 of the Municipal Code. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be approved by the Community Development Department. The plans are not approved for construction until they have been approved and signed by the Coachella Valley Water District and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner. 63. The applicant shall provide landscaping in required setbacks, retention basins, and common lots. 64. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit plans for approval by the Community Development Department prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking is complete, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner prior to submitting for signature by the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 65. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. 10 �.) U44 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommneded TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 14 66. The developer and subsequent property owner shall continuously maintain all required landscaping in a healthy and viable condition as required by Section 9.60.240 (H) of the Zoning Ordinance. PUBLIC SERVICES 67. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by Sunline Transit and approved by the City Engineer. QUALITY ASSURANCE 68. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures which meet the approval of the City Engineer. 69. The applicant shall employ or retain qualified civil engineers, geotechnical engineers, surveyors, or other appropriate professionals to provide sufficient construction supervision to be able to furnish and sign accurate record drawings. 70. The applicant shall arrange and bear the cost of measurement, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program but required by the City as evidence that construction materials and methods comply with plans, specifications and applicable regulations. 71. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were signed by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As - Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the CAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City to reflect as -constructed conditions. MAINTENANCE 72. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks (except for multi -use trails). The applicant shall maintain required public improvements until expressly released from this responsibility by the appropriate public agency. 0 50 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommneded TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 15 FEES AND DEPOSITS 73. The applicant shall pay the City's established fees for plan checking and construction inspection. Fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan checking and permits. 74. Prior to approval of a final map or completion of any approval process for modification of boundaries of the property or lots subject to these conditions, the applicant shall process a reapportionment of any bonded assessment(s) against the property and pay the cost of the reapportionment. 75. The developer shall pay school mitigation fees to the Coachella Valley Unified School District based on their requirements. Fees shall be paid prior to building permit issuance by the City. 76. Provisions shall be made to comply with the terms and requirements of the City's adopted Infrastructure Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. 77. Prior to final map approval, parkland fees shall be paid as required by Section 13.48 of the Subdivision Ordinance. 78. Within ten days of the review by the Planning Commission, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Community Development Department a check made out to the County of Riverside in the amount of $64 to permit the filing and posting of EA 2001-417 (Revised) after the City Council's review. FIRE DEPARTMENT 79. Approved standard fire hydrants, located at each street intersection and spaced not more than 330 feet apart with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1,000 g.p.m. for a 2-hour duration at 20 psi. 80. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in the middle of streets directly in line with fire hydrants. 81. Gates entrances shall be at least two feet wider than the width of the travel lanes. Any gate providing access from a road to a driveway shall be located at least 35'-0" setback from the roadway and shall open to allow a vehicle to stop 040" Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommneded TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 16 without obstructing traffic on the road. Where one way road with a single traffic lane provides access to a gate entrance, a 40-foot turning radius shall be used. 82. Gates, if any, shall be equipped with a rapid entry system (KNOX). Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Gate pins shall be rated with a shear pin force, not to exceed 30 pounds. Gates activated by the rapid entry system shall remain open until closed by the rapid entry system. 83. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. 84. The applicant or developer shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. 85. The minimum dimension for access roads is 20 feet clear and unobstructed width and a minimum clearance of 13'-6" in height. MISCELLANEOUS 86. All public agency letters received for this case are made part of the case file documents for plan checking purposes. 87. All mitigation measures included in Environmental Assessment 2001-417 (Revised) are hereby included in this approval. 88. Separate pedestrian gates shall be provided at each site access location. 89. Prior to submitted the Final Map for plan check consideration, the following corrections and/or information shall be provided: A. Lots 131 (retention basin) and 132 (well site) shall be designated as lettered lots. B. Two copies of the draft Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC and R's). The City Attorney shall approve the document prior to approval of the final map by the City Council. J - - 047 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommneded TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 17 C. A minimum of three street names shall be submitted for each private street shown on the Map exhibit. A list of the names in ranking order shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for approval. D. Bureau of Reclamation easements that traverse the project site shall be disclosed. E. No permanent improvements may be constructed within the 50-foot easement area of the Avenue 58 agricultural drain or the 10-foot easement area of lateral 123.45-0.75 without the written consent of the Coachella Valley Water District. 043 . • • 1N THE CITY OF L1 OUINTA. COUNTY OF RWRSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNM TEI V TATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30092 THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST OWTER OF SECTION 22. T.M. R.7E. SA# BERMRDINO MEROM NaIIK 1 INCIN1111pjoc,PAPFI.2M ow w�wM %n.�� w aim �� O two _ Attachment 1 ILW r1 a.. Q L 0 E i-+ In 0 0 L— C 0 r� M. . LA OUMA ��m a u �l► o�Mwt nor wr am ML Ow10[� M01ti[ . AL .a ..Ja Z »s ursr. wt. r�x�awrt s� �� suscMo[ Lo a rMCAL LOT DRAN40E aErA< *01 ro sc" i sort Pow _ „PPAU,OPC ►A Mup.. R tOr O[N "K.- C MG OI Mrl COwMR" M►si M0. a My IrvRM MOW M ePT� VOM b1Ar w saw stt "14114 G5� r City Council Minutes Attachment 2 July 3, 2001 Council recessed to and until 7:00 p.m. 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT - None PRESENTATIONS - None PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. PUBLIC HEARING T CERTIFY A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL 1 T FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-418, AND A REQUEST APPROVAL TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION TO LOW DEN RESIDENTIAL AND THE GENERAL PLAN TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENT] FOR APPROXIMATELY 240 ACRES WITHIN THE SPHERE INFLUE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR SUBSEQUENT ANNE ON BOU D ON THE NORTH BY AVENUE 52, ON THE EAST ONROE S ET, ON THE SOUTH BY AVENUE 53, AND EAST OF Te STING CITY IT LINES. APPLICANT: NRI, LA QUINTA LIMITED PRSHIP. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPE Community Development Director He orted the developer has requested a continuance to July 17, 2001. MOTION - It was moved by C cil Members Sniff/Henderson to continue the public hearing on Genera n Amendment 2001-077 and Change of Zone 2001-100 for NRI, L rota Limited Partnership to July 17, 2001. Motion carried unanimous) INUTE ORDER NO. 2001-104. BLIC HEARING TO CERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-417 ID APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30092, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE .09 ACRES INTO 97 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST ►RNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MONROE STREET. APPLICANT: BARTON PROPERTIES, INC. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. 5" Community Development Director Herman presented the staff report. City Council Minutes 16 July 3, 2001 In response to Council Member Adolph, Mr. Herman advised the access on Monroe Street is for fire services only. Council Member Adolph voiced concern about one entrance/exit gate being sufficient for the development. David Hacker, of Hacker Engineering and representing the applicant, stated they agree with staff's findings. He referenced Condition No. 4 of the tract map and noted staff has indicated they will work with the applicant to obtain the listed approvals so as not to delay the project unnecessarily. He also referred to. Condition No. 36 and noted the development will not be utilizing individual lot retention basins. In response to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Hacker stated the developer does not feel a secondary gate is necessary for 97 homes. He advised emergency personnel will have access to the lock box to open the emergency exit. Council Member Adolph noted sufficient room exists for a secondary exit should the homeowners association determine the need later on. In response to Council Member Adolph, Mr. Hacker advised the entrance gate will be staffed initially but key -operated later on. He added there's room for six vehicles in the entrance gate stacking area. There being no other requests to speak, the Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Herman confirmed staff will assist the developer in achieving the approvals required in Condition No. 4. He noted for the record that the project is within the City's Sphere of Influence but outside the City Limits. Therefore, any approval of the project is subject to approval of the annexation application currently in process at LAFCO. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (BARTON PROPERTIES). It was moved by Council Members Adolph/Sniff to adopt Resolution No. 2001-91 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. 052 City Council Minutes 17 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-92 July 3, 2001 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 37.08 ACRES INTO 97 SINGLE FAMILY AND OTHER PRIVATE STREET AND COMMON LOTS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MONROE STREET (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30092 - BARTON PROPERTIES). It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to adopt Resolution No. 2001-92 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. 3. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDE . 8% RATE INCREASE FOR THE RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, OLL-OFF RATES FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND AUTHORI RESIDENTIAL RATES TO BE PLACED ON THE TAX ROLLS FOR FI AR 2001 /2002 TO BE USED FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2002. The Mayor d the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. .Ado Com5JAWDevelopment Director Herman presente PK being no requests to speak, the Ma OSED. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-93 aff report. red the PUBLIC HEARING A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA INTA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERI LEVY AND COLLECTION OF AS SMENTS FOR REFUSE COLL AND RECYCLING SERVICES FRO SIDENTIAL PROPERTIES W HE CITY PURSUANT TO LA QUI HARTER AND MUNICIPAL CHAPTER 6.04 (RESIDENTIAL WA E SCHEDULE). It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adol adopt Resolution No. 2001-93 as submitted. Motion carried unani RESOLUTION NO. 2001-94 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING THE e E OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR THE COLLECTION, RECYCLIN 939), AND DISPOSAL OF RUBBISH AND GARBAGE FROM COMMERCIAL, CONSTRUCTION, AND INDUSTRIAL (ROLL - OFF) ESTABLISHMENTS AND CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES (DIRECT BILL) WITHIN THE CITY (COMMERCIAL WASTE FEE SCHEDULE). ' { u53 05 � • : OUAr�rnr�s 64,0000 64.0000 C.Y. DESIGN USED LOT NUAIM ING COMM �o�th Attachment 3 IN THE CITY OF " QUINFA, COUNTY OF RWRSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA NTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 3009 2� THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, T.6S , R.7E; S.B.B.M. A.P.N. 761-720-r019IL&W - --�; LfayAr� AL 4,r PILE ¢ GRADE SHOW AS Ofw E A.f' AQ - r - - A. 2 . A.G BASE EXfST. WIAtSE COAT PI9 MD SUB6YtW Z7 COURSE MOM M AVWW� YOMOE BTR�T ex"M SIM an ML r6 054 Attachment 4 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 10. Commissioners Kirk, Butler, and Tyler agreed. 11. There being no further discussion, it was moved anede. nded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planningmission Resolution 2002-001, recommending Certificatiitigated 01446, Negative Declaration of Environmental Impa Envronmental Assessment 2001-415, as recommende ROLL . AYES: Commissioners Butl k, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: 12. It was mov nd sec by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to adopt Planning Resolution 2002-002, recommending approval of Tenta act Map 29963, as submitted. ROLL CALL: AYES: missi s Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chair Abels. NO None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: N 13. The ng no further discussion, it moved and seconded by C issioners Robbins/Tyler to ado Planning Commission lution 2002-003 recommending to City Council that a blic hearing be held to consider Street Nam ange 2001-013. L CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbi Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. STAIN: None. C. Continued - Environmental Assessment 2001-417 and Tentative Tract Map 30092; a request of Barton Properties for certification of an Environmental Assessment and subdivision of approximately 38.4 acres into 130 single family and other common lots located at the northwest corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if this was within the City's Sphere of 5 1 i Influence. Community Development Director Jerry Herman G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-8-02.wpd 6 (it 3 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 clarified it was annexed into the City November 30, 2001. Commissioner Tyler asked about the temporary designation for the CVWD lift station. Commissioner Robbins clarified till someone builds a sewer it will be used. Commissioner Tyler asked about Condition #2 regarding the expiration date. Staff stated it is two years from the date of the City Council approval and the condition could be removed. Commissioner Tyler asked about Condition 50 regarding the City's new standard in regard to the Kvs for power poles. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated it is only the power lines that are attached to the 92 Kv power poles that are exempt, and therefore, it would be changed to 92 Kv. Commissioner Tyler asked about the multi -use trail as it did not appear to go anywhere. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the City has envisioned a trail system that goes east and west to create a trail system leading to Lake Cahuilla which has a trail head. Commissioner Tyler questioned Condition #62 as to whether or not is was needed as it does not appear to allow sufficient stacking. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated that since these are private streets staff anticipates that a future HOA will want to gate the entrance and staff wants to ensure the street entrance is sufficiently designed to accommodate a gate. Since the map and language have been redesigned, staff would suggest the condition be deleted. Commissioner Tyler. questioned Condition #89 as to whether or not it would apply to, the emergency access on Monroe Street. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated as the condition is currently written there would be a pedestrian access at the emergency access. 3. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. David Hacker, Hacker Engineering representing the applicant, stated he concurred with the conditions with the exception of Condition #52.D, regarding the multi -use trail. It would be a maintenance item for the HOA. They would prefer to dedicate to the City so that when the dedication of the additional right-of-way from adjacent property owners was obtained, this could then be constructed. At this time they would prefer to landscape the area. 4. Commissioner Butler asked if they were willing to bond for it. Mr. Hacker asked what type of trail it would be. Commissioner Butler stated mostly equestrian. Mr. Hacker stated they accepted the condition as written., G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-8-02.wpd 7 ll Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 5. Commissioner Robbins asked about the purpose of having a dry well on each lot, as most of them will never be maintained and why isn't the retention basin sized to handle the run off. Mr. Hacker stated the retention basin is large enough to handle the run off, this is a backup solution only. 6. Commissioner Kirk stated it appears to be the drainage plan of first resort by the way the lots are laid out. Mr. Hacker stated the dry well is an option and will only be installed if they do not meet the drainage requirements. 7. Commissioner Robbins asked staff if this was allowed. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated the 100 year storm needs to be retained in the retention basin. The City does allow them to retain their nuisance water in privately gated communities in alternate methods. If they are for nuisance water it is up to the applicant. If storm water, the retention basin needs to retain it. Mr. Hacker stated he concurred. 8. There being no further discussion, the public participation of the hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 9. Commissioner Tyler stated his only concern was that it is just another straight line development. 10. Commissioner Butler asked if the stacking on Avenue 58 was enough. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated two car stacking is 50 feet and will be enough and went on to explain the traffic flow. 11. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-004, recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-417, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 12. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-005, recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 30092, Amendment #1, as 1 amended. G:\WPDOCS\PC 1V1inutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 8 (`' Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 A. Delete Condition #62. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. D. Specific Plan 98-034. Amendment #1; a request of Warner Engineering for Lundin Development Company for dment to the text development standards and design es a n amendment to the site plan design adjacent to A, 50 f 100,500 square foot shopping center located at th hwest c r of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. 1. Chairman Ab opened the c hearing and asked for the staff report. P ipal Planner n Sawa presented the information contai in the staff rt, a copy of which is on file in the Co nity Develop t Department. 2. airman Abel ked if there wereestio !' of staff. Commissioner er asked if the Co ion had t /,authority to f waive the re ement for the b g. Staff st d it is a Zoning Ordinance uirement but, r a Specific P . the development standard be modifie ommissioner r. asked if the right - out at emergen ate on the we y driveway not being inclu in the S is Plan was an ersight or a reluctance of the plicant taff stated the id not know, but they are co ion install it. 3. C issioner Butler aske out any alternatives to the berming. Staff stated the applica alternative is landscape ide the screening along w' a wall next to the f restaur Commissioner Butler ed if the bermi a safety fa for traffic on Jeffers Street or ae cs. Staff stat was aesthetics. 4. Commissioner k as or background on t se of setbacks for retention. explained the reasons gave examples. Commissioner Kirk asked if staff had a r mendation on the number of accesses that should be allowe n Avenue 50, beyond the emergency access. Senior Enginee eve Speer stated staff has been scaling the distances between a driveways and it came to 109 feet which is rather short. a result, staff added Condition #38.E. eliminating the one access on the west end of the site on Avenue 50. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 9 T 0 4hf 4�Q�rw AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 5, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Public Hearing to Certify a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental PUBLIC HEARING: Assessment 2001-437, Review of General Plan Amendment 2001-081 and Zone Change 2001-104 to Change 14 Acres at the Northeastern Corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 52 from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial; Specific Plan 1990-016, Amendment No. 1 Modifying Standards and Design Guidelines for the Construction of 490 Single Family Residences, 60 Resort Residential Units, an 18 Hole Golf Course and a 14 Acre Neighborhood Shopping Center; and Tentative Tract Map 30357 to Subdivide Portions of the Project Area into 178 Residential Lots, Lots for Future Residential Subdivision, Casitas Development, Golf Course, Maintenance and Clubhouse Facility Lots, and Other Lettered Lots for Streets and Other Facilities for the Property Located on the East Side of Jefferson Street, Between Avenue 50 and Avenue 52. Applicant: Toll Brothers, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council Certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-437. 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment 2001-081. 3. Move to take up Ordinance No. approving Zone Change 2001-104 by title and number only and waive further reading. Move to introduce Ordinance No. on first reading. 4. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 1990-016, Amendment No. 1, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval. 5. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract Map 30357, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval. G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\To11Bros.wpd FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The proposed project site is located between Avenue 50 and Avenue 52, on the east side of Jefferson Street. The land is currently vacant. A Specific Plan was approved for the site in 1990, but not constructed upon. Since a Specific Plan approval does not lapse unless amended, the applicant proposes to amend the Plan to allow for the development of the community they now envision for the site. Project Request In addition to the Environmental Assessment, the following applications have been filed: 1. A General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone for the northeast corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 52. The land is currently designated Low Density Residential. The applicant proposes to change the designation to Neighborhood Commercial, to allow the development of a shopping center. 2. A Specific Plan Amendment to modify design standards and guidelines for the construction of all components of the project area, including up to 490 single family units on 148 acres, 60 "casitas" (resort residential) units on five acres, a 206 acre golf course and associated clubhouse, a two acre golf maintenance facility, a 14 acre shopping center and two well sites on four acres. The total project area is 379 acres. 3. A Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the land for 178 of the 490 residential lots, future areas to be subdivided into residential lots, the casitas lot, the golf course and maintenance facility lots, and a number of lettered lots which will be developed for streets and open space/landscaping areas. Project Description The original Specific Plan (1990-016) for The Grove project was for an area of approximately 305 acres. Since that time, no development has occurred, and the applicant has secured an additional 73 acres, in the northwestern portion of the property. The applicant proposes the construction of single family residential units around an 18 hole golf course. The project will also include a clubhouse, to be located �- in the center of the property, and 60 adjacent "casitas" units. The proposed tentative �- OOq G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\To11Bros.wpd tract map only subdivides the land into 178 residential lots. The balance of the land to be used for residential lots will be subdivided at a later date. The residential and golf portions of the project will take primary access from Jefferson Street, just south of the northern property line. Additional access points will occur on both Avenue 50 and Avenue 52. This access point will also be the primary access for the golf maintenance facility. Access to the shopping center site, located at the northeast corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street, will be from both Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street, and will be kept separate from the residential and golf components. No Site Development Permits have been requested at this time. Such permits will be necessary in the future for prototype housing, the golf clubhouse and maintenance facility, and the shopping center. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed these applications at its regularly scheduled meeting of January 8, 2002 (Attachment 1). A number of issues were discussed. The Planning Commission imposed two conditions of approval (Specific Plan Conditions No. 17 and 18) where the applicant is to provide additional information for further consideration by the City. These issues are: 1) the request to lower building height along the eastern project perimeter; and 2) the request for the golf course design to conform with the City's Water Conserving Landscaping Ordinance even though golf courses are exempt. The applicant will address these issues at the meeting. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The findings necessary to approve this request can be made, and are included in the attached Resolutions. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council Certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-437. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment 2001-081. Move to take up Ordinance No. approving Zone Change 2001-104 by title and number only and waive further reading. Move to introduce Ordinance No. on first reading. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 1990-016, Amendment No. 1, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval. 5 � � G:\WPDOCS\CC SO Rpts\To11Bros.wpd `" 003 Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract Map 30357, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval; or 2. Do not adopt the above Resolutions; or 3. Remand the applications to the Planning Commission for further consideration; or 4. Continue the request and provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, deify Herma CoInmunity evelopment Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Planning Commission Minutes of January 8, 2002. 2. Specific Plan Document UULI RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-437 PREPARED FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-081, ZONE CHANGE 2001-104, SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-437 APPLICANT: TOLL BROTHERS, INC. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 5th day of February 2002 hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2001-437 for General Plan Amendment 2001-081, Zone Change 2001-104, Specific Plan 1990-016, Amendment #1, and Tentative Tract Map 30357, located on the east side of Jefferson Street, between Avenue 50 and Avenue 52: WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 8th day of January 2002 hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2001-437 for General Plan Amendment 2001-081, Zone Change 2001-104, Specific Plan 1990-016, Amendment #1, and Tentative Tract Map 30357, located on the east side of Jefferson Street, between Avenue 50 and Avenue 52, more particularly described as: APN 772-250-002 & 003, 772-250-007 through 012, 772-270-001 through 004, 772-270-006 WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study (EA 2001-437) and has determined that although the proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-081, Zone Change 2001-104, Specific Plan 1990-016, Amendment #1, and Tentative Tract Map 30357 could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because appropriate mitigation measures were made a part of the assessment and included in the conditions of approval and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify certification of said Environmental 513 Assessment: J G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\To11BrosEA.wpd u� City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-437 Toll Bros., Inc. Adopted: February 5, 2002 1 . The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-081, Zone Change 2001-104, Specific Plan 1990-016, Amendment #1, and Tentative Tract Map 30357 will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2001-437. 2. The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 4. The proposed project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. 5. The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. 6. The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identifi.ed which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 8. The Planning Commission has considered the Environmental Assessment 2001- 437 and the Environmental Assessment reflects the independent judgement of the City. 9. The City has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). J. UOG G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\ToIIBrosEA.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-437 Toll Bros., Inc. Adopted: February 5, 2002 10. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitutes the findings of the City Council for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby certify Environmental Assessment 2001-437 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum on file in the Community Development Department. 3. That Environmental Assessment 2001-437 reflects the independent judgement of the City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 5th day of February 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\To11BrosEA.wpd 001 City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-437 Toll Bros., Inc. Adopted: February 5, 2002 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California J .? )t)8 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosEA.wpd Environmental Checklist Form Environmental Assessment 2001-437 Planning Commission Resolution 2002-007 City Council Resolution 2002- 1. Project Title: General Plan Amendment 2001-081, Zone Change 2001- 104, Specific Plan 1990-016, Amendment # 1, and Tentative Tract Map 30357 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Christine di lorio, 760-777-7125 4. Project Location: East side of Jefferson Street, between Avenue 50 and Avenue 52 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Toll Brothers, Inc. 8901 E. Mountain View Road Scottsdale, AZ 85258 6. General Plan Designation: Current: Low Density Residential Proposed: Low Density Residential, Neighborhood Commercial 7. Zoning: Current: Low Density Residential Proposed: Low Density Residential, Neighborhood Commercial 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to change 14 acres from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. Specific Plan to amend development standards for the construction of low density residential units, casitas, golf course and a neighborhood shopping center. Tentative Tract Map to create residential and golf course lots, as well as a number of lettered lots. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings. North: Golf course, low density residential South: Vacant desert lands, low density residential West: Jefferson Street, PGA West East: La Quinta Polo Estates, Coachella Canal 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Not applicable G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\To11BrosCk1st.WPD 009 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology and Soils Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared F07 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 10K I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. FEI I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Christine di Iorio Printed Name Date Citv of La Ouinta For . 010 ra iL G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Toll Bros Cklst.WPD Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: l . A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analysis are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. The analysis of each issue should identify: If a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\To11BrosCk1st.WPD 3 0 1 J. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: AESTHETICS: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (General Plan Exhibit CIR-5) b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (General Plan EIR, page 5-12 ff.) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials) II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES:. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Dept. Of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29, 5-32) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (Aerial photographs) III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) Potentiall y Significan t Impact Potentially Significant Less Than Unless Significant No Mitigated Impact Impact FN X KI 91 0 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\To11BrosCk1st.WPD 4 U 1 n !w d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X (Project Description) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Project Description) X IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment, Exhibit 5-1) b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff., biological resource letter, LSA Associates, August 2001) c) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) Either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (La Quinta Municipal Code; General Plan) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-5) V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? (Letter dated August 22, 2001, LSA Associates) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resources (i.e., an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? (Letter dated August 22, 2001, LSA Associates) c) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? (Lakebed Delineation Map) G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\To11BrosCk1st.WPD X X X X X X X X VI. VII. d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (Letter dated August 22, 2001, LSA Associates) GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.2-3, page 4-35) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6-2, page 6-7) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6-2, page 6-7) iv) Landslides? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6-2, page 6-7) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6-2, page 6-7) c) Be located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on - or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (General Plan MEA, page 6-2 ff) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-32) HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Application Materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Application Materials) c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Application Materials) d) Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Riverside County Hazardous Materials Listing) X X X X X X X X X /m X G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Toll Bros Cklst.WPD 6 J e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip; would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 6-11) h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildlands fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-26, 6-27) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (General Plan EIR, page 4-57 ff.) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off - site? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff., and "Hydrology Specific Plan 90-016 Tentative Tract 30357," prepared by MDS Consulting, October 2001) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff., and "Hydrology Specific Plan 90-016 Tentative Tract 30357," prepared by MDS Consulting, October 2001) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems to control? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff., and "Hydrology Specific Plan 90-016 Tentative Tract 30357," prepared by MDS Consulting, October 2001) f) Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-13) g) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-13) X ►94 ►0 X X X X X X X X 5`'`) kw J IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Specific Plan Project Description) X U1J G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\To11BrosCk1st.WPD b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purposes of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Master Environmental Assessment 2-11) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5- 5) X. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29) XI. NOISE: Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6- 4, page 6-17, and "Noise Impact Analysis," prepared by LSA Associates, October 2001) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6-4, page 6-17, and "Noise Impact Analysis," prepared by LSA Associates, October 2001) c) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6-4, page 6-17, and "Noise Impact Analysis," prepared by LSA Associates, October 2001) d) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Master Environmental Assessment) e) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive levels? (General Plan map) XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (General Plan, page 2-14) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) KI X GI_ X X X X X X X X J� O l c, G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Toll Bros Cklst.WPD c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) L-X XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff. ) Police protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff. ) Schools? (General Plan MEA, page 4-9 ff. ) Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA, page 4-14 ff. ) XIV. RECREATION: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application Materials) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application Materials) XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff., and "Draft Traffic Study," prepared by LSA Associates, October 2001) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff., and "Draft Traffic Study," prepared by LSA Associates, October 2001) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff., and "Draft Traffic Study," prepared by LSA Associates, October 2001) d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff., and "Draft Traffic Study," prepared by LSA Associates, October 2001) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Application Materials) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Application Materials) X X X X X X X X X X X X X G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Toll Bros Cklst.WPD Uii g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation X (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Application Materials) XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24 ) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24 ) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, page 4-27) d) Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, page 4-20) e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, page 4-20) f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (General Plan MEA, page 4-28) XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X X X X X X M M X X G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Toll Bros Cklst.WPD 10 XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSIS. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. No earlier analysis were used in this review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. See attached Addendum. SOURCES: Master Environmental Assessment, City of La Quinta General Plan 1992. SCAQMD CEQA Handbook. General Plan, City of La Quinta, 1992. City of La Quinta Municipal Code "Draft Traffic Study," prepared by LSA Associates, October 2001 "Noise Impact Analysis," prepared by LSA Associates, October 2001 Cultural Resources letter dated August 22, 2001, LSA Associates Biological Resources letter dated August 22, 2001, LSA Associates Results of Phase II Testing of Two Prehistoric Sites within the Grove/Mountain View Country Club Project, LSA Associates, January 21, 2002 Paleontological Resource Assessment, LSA Associates, December 4, 2001 "Hydrology Specific Plan 90-016 Tentative Tract 30357," prepared by MDS Consulting, October 15, 2001 3 UU G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Toll Bros Cklst.WPD 11 Addendum for Environmental Assessment 2001-437 Planning Commission Resolution 2002-007 III. a) The proposed project will generate air pollution primarily from the operation of motor vehicles. The traffic study estimates that a total of 12,941 new trips will be generated by the proposed project'. Based on this trip generation, the project at buildout will generate the following pollutants. Running Exhaust Emissions (pounds/day) PM 10 PM 10 PM 10 CO ROC NOx Exhaust Brakes Tires 50 mph 334.2 12.96 68.5 -- 1.43 1.43 4 6 Daily Threshold 550 75 100 150 Based on 12,941 trips/day and average trip length of 5 miles, using EMFAC7G Model provided by California Air Resources Board. Assumes catalytic light autos at 75°F. * Operational thresholds provided by SCAQMD for assistance in determining the significance of a project and the need for an EIR. As demonstrated in the Table above, the proposed project will not exceed any threshold for the generation of moving emissions, as established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District in determining the need for an EIR. The impacts to air quality relating to chemical pollution are not expected to be significant. Ill. c) The Coachella Valley is a non -attainment area for PM 10 (particulate matter of 10 microns or smaller). The construction of the proposed project has the potential to generate dust, which could contribute to the PM 10 problem in the area. In order to control PM 10, the City has imposed standards and requirements on development to control dust. The applicant will be required to submit a dust management plan prior to initiation of any earth moving activity at the site. In addition, the potential impacts associated with PM 10 can be mitigated by the mitigation measures below. 1. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. "Draft Traffic Study," prepared by LSA Associates, October 18, 2001. J V r)0 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\To11BrosAddend.WPD 2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation. 3. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. Cut and fill quantities will be balanced on site. 5. Any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. 6. Watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on -going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. 7. All disturbed areas shall be treated to prevent erosion until the site is constructed upon. Pad sites which are to remain undeveloped shall be seeded with either a desert wildflower mix or grass seed, or chemical stabilizer. 8. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. Perimeter landscaping on Avenues 50 and 52 and Jefferson Street shall be completed with the first phase of development. 9. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean up of construction -related dirt on approach routes to the site. 10. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, the impacts to air quality from buildout will not be significant. IV. b) A biological resource site survey was conducted for the proposed project site2. A mesquite hummock is located on the subject property. This feature has been identified by the Department of Fish & Game as an important community in the Coachella Valley. In order to mitigate the potential impacts to this natural community, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented. 2 Biological Resources letter dated August 13, 2001, LSA Associates. U2�. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\To11BrosAddend.WPD 2 1 . Prior to construction or site preparation activities, the project developer shall enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with CDFG and an appropriate non-profit organization whose purpose is to acquire and manage land for the purpose of protecting special status plants and wildlife. This MOU shall provide the organization chosen the financial resources necessary to purchase and manage 1 acre of mesquite hummock habitat in the Willow Hole area. V. b) A Phase I Cultural Resource Survey and Phase 11 testing were conducted for the subject property'. The site survey included identification of previously recorded sites, and additional finds. The Phase I recommended testing. The testing did not indicate that additional significant resources were present on the parcel and no further test excavation is warranted. Therefore, the mitigation measure as recommended by the professional archaeologist is that the portion of the parcel that contained the cultural resources be monitored during any grading activities. V. c) A Paleontological Resource Assessment was conducted for the subject property.' The record search did not identify any previous surveys for the project area, but did recognize the high potential for impacts to nonrenewable paleontological resources and recommended, prior to issuance of a grading permit impact mitigation program as follows: 1. Excavation for the proposed project has potential to impact significant nonrenewable paleontological resources. The project proponent must retain a qualified vertebrate paleontologist to carry out a PRIMP. This program must conform to the guidelines of the City of La Quinta and The County of Riverside and to recommendations of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. The PRIMP must include project -specific measures to reduce impacts to the fossils to a level less than significant. The program must 'include, but not be limited to: a. Monitoring of excavation by a qualified vertebrate paleontologic monitor to recover paleontological resources. Project specifics that will be incorporated into the PRIMP should include excavation monitoring that starts on a half-time basis, and continues until vertebrate fossils (fish, reptile, bird or mammal remains) are encountered by the monitor. When vertebrate remains are recognized, the monitoring will increase to a full-time basis. The monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt or redirect Cultural Resources Letter dated August 22, 2001, LSA Associates. Results of Phase II Testing of Two Prehistoric Sites Within the Grove/Mt. View Country Club Project. j 3 r+ v 4 Paleontological Resource Assessment, LSA Associates, December 4, 2001 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\To11BrosAddend.WPD 3 construction activities to ensure avoidance of adverse impacts to paleontological resources. The monitor shall be equipped to rapidly remove any fossil specimens encountered during excavation. b. Preparation of recovered specimens to a point of identification, including washing of sediments to recover small fossil vertebrates. If small fossils are encountered, a standard 6,000 pound bulk matrix sample will be collected from each locality. Removal of surplus sediment from around the specimens reduces the volume of storage for the repository and the storage cost for the developer. C. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, itemized catalogs of al material collected and identified will be provided to the City of La Quinta with the specimens. A report documenting the results of the monitoring and salvage activities, and analyzing the significance of the fossils will be prepared. d. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, preparation of a report with an appended, itemized inventory of specimens. The fossils from the project shall be given to the City of La Quinta for permanent curation and storage. The report and inventory, when submitted to the City, signifies the completion of the program to mitigate impacts to paleontological resources. Compliance with these recommendations will ensure that the impacts to the paleontological resources are below a threshold of significance as required in CEQA. V1. a) i) & i0 The proposed project lies in a Zone III groundshaking zone. The property, as with the rest of the City, will be subject to significant ground movement in the event of a major earthquake. Structures on the site will be required to meet the City's standards for construction, which include Uniform Building Code requirements for seismic zones. The City Engineer will require the preparation of site -specific geotechnical analysis in conjunction with the submittal of grading plans (please see below). This requirement will ensure that impacts from ground shaking are reduced to a less than significant level. V1. b) Portions of the subject property are subject to soil erosion due to wind. The City will implement requirements for a PM 10 management plan, and additional mitigation measures have been included in the Air Quality discussion above. r These mitigation measures will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. - 023 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\To11BrosAddend.WPD 4 VIII. b) Domestic water is provided by the Coachella Valley Water District, which extracts groundwater from a number of wells in the Lower Thermal sub -basin. The development of the project site will require domestic water, and can also irrigate the proposed golf course utilizing canal water, since the All American Canal is located adjacent to the project site. This usage will reduce the potential impacts to water resources on the project site. The project proponent will be required to implement the City's standards for water conserving plumbing fixtures and on -site retention, which both aid in reducing the potential impacts associated with groundwater. The proposed project will also meet the requirements of the City's water -conserving landscaping ordinance. These standards will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. VIII. c)-d) The City requires that all construction projects retain the 100 year 24 hour storm on -site. A hydrology study has been prepared for the project site which analysis several drainage areas, and assigns retention amounts'. The study identifies the measures necessary to control water in the event of a storm. The project's drainage plan will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of grading permits. The preparation of final grading plans will be reviewed by the City Engineer to ensure conformance with the drainage study and City standards. These requirements will ensure that the impacts associated with drainage at the site are reduced to a less than significant level. XI. a) A noise study was prepared for the proposed project6. The study found that the project's sensitive receptors (the residential dwelling units) will be impacted by traffic noise, noise from the well sites, and noise from the commercial site. In order to mitigate these impacts, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1. A six foot high perimeter wall shall be installed for residential properties, at a minimum: a. Within 238 feet of the centerline of Jefferson Street south of Avenue 50. b. Within 152 feet of the centerline of Avenue 50 between Jefferson and Madison Streets. 2. A six foot high wall shall be constructed around both well sites at the project. "Hydrology Specific Plan 90-016 Tentative Tract 30357," prepared by MDS Consulting, October 15, 2001. 6 5 3 �Y "Noise Impact Analysis," prepared by LSA Associates, October 19, 2001. *� G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\To11BrosAddend.WPD 5 3. A six foot high wall shall be constructed on the northwest corner of the project site adjacent to the commercial lands at Jefferson and Avenue 50. 4. A six foot high wall shall be constructed on the southwest corner of the project site adjacent to the commercial lands at Jefferson Street and Avenue 52. XI. c) The noise study also found that noise levels will be affected by construction activities on the site. In order to mitigate these impacts, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1. All construction equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers. 2. All stationary construction equipment shall be placed in such a manner as to emit noise away from sensitive receptors. 3. Equipment staging areas shall be located as far away from sensitive receptors as possible. 4. Construction activities shall be limited to the hours prescribed in the La Quinta Municipal Code. These mitigation measures will reduce the potential impacts associated with noise at the subject property to a less than significant level. XIII. a) The proposed development will have a direct impact on public services and will be served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, acting under City contract. Site development will generate property tax and sales taxes which will offset the costs of added police and fire services. The project area will be required to pay the mandated school fees as development occurs. These fees mitigate the students generated, and offset the impacts to schools. The collection of property tax, and the generation of sales tax will generate revenues to the City to offset the added costs associated with the provision of municipal services. The project will be required to participate in the City's Impact Fee Program, which helps to offset roadway improvement costs. Site development is not expected to have a significant impact on municipal services or facilities. 53 � XV. a) U25 ^' G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\To11BrosAddend.WPD 6 A traffic study was prepared for the proposed project'. The study found that the traffic generated from the project site, both residential and commercial, will not reduce levels of service to a less than acceptable level, assuming surrounding roadways are improved to City standards. No mitigation measures are therefore needed to ensure that impacts associated with traffic generation are reduced to a less than significant level. 7 "Draft Traffic Analysis," prepared by LSA Associates, October 18, 2001. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\ToIIBrosAddend.WPD 7 I N N , N O o o � 0 o � 0 3 N O � � � � O o a� W N o� zo 00 0 z O v� Z ao CldN a ►04 O z a 0 wOno z N p a a Oz a 0z z , „o C) N •� M N C14 to O �U� �+ 1-4 N 00 ¢, •-i CA o E--� O N -- O E-•i O O z z � v ~ ICI � a F A z �' ¢A �W ox UU U � 'C a 43 bn l � � � O V► p aA 0 O � 0 O U C En cl) lull o � o COO o cd w waw waQ wan a z0 a CIS w w b U U U GQ GA U Q z o r ol Cd 0 V1 m Cd V Cd ¢ N 'd o o a O U O 0 027 6 d � A A a� a� �W �W OV OV V V CIS � 0 U z cd cd z � CA Ln t ° O� 0 O� o a�2 o 0 G > G > > zz Q zz Q Q cc cc UQ U�1 UQ c..•� s; U = O U c o +6 v 'd x U N a� � U � � a Z rn W o Z '� o M'= 'an V a �--� o�'=" v1 a a� a o :.. a� o 'r--� � °o � .� 03 =��°.�'a > Cd Ha Na 0-4 oEn •�.��CA �, � cd 1,r � —,U) , W o o 0 o� Cd> O o i U> 0 a W V.z •� �'" W a �'" a o° o o .c o °' o c° �• tin V ICI o o C�"{S�y"y �" ►-a cd �; 0 0 ..� 1 'n > . � H G� � U cd ' Q) O �Or •o�o,D��?�-rs��a�� a� H� cl� pq a" VrA o .° .d U0-0 Ln 02O F A V� z A aV �W ox VV G� a o U U U ►� 4-4 cd 0 rA rA O bA O O bA Cd O z Q A Q zz a a Cd cd UQ U UQ W C= a) C cd N cd O�" vbD0 v �' z 0-4 0 '� `0 411, 1-0o � � � � � ° m `d > mod' 4-4 0 0 �• o ice. "a0 �° an o b ' 3 ' O d) O C s, � 4-4 En Cd w U w Cdb cd �. cd O.No,� ° �•3 t4,-; cd 00 cz 00°'�o� a�4. z o n° wo" b°Cdo b cd C (� 2. H� 9 x U .a O 0 0 0 .0 ,0 ,0 ,0 0 0 rA U U U U A A A A cd Cd A A A A tD to b "Cl Ts b o � a 0 N O 00' c, rA o ° +J U .� O a) C con LM 030 v a 3 0 2 a> 0 m` 0 H y Q RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CHANGE FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 14 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND AVENUE 52 CASE NO.: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-081 APPLICANT: TOLL BROTHERS, INC. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5th day of February 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to review a General Plan Amendment to change 14 acres of land designated Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial at the northeast corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 52; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 8th day of January 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to review a General Plan Amendment to change 14 acres of land designated Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial at the northeast corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 52; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings approving said General Plan Amendment: 1 . Internal General Plan Consistency. The proposed amendment to the Land Use Map would change 14 acres of land designated Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. This represents a logical extension of the land use pattern in the City, and is supported by General Plan goals and policies regarding providing a full range of services and opportunities for City residents. 2. Public Welfare. The proposed amendment will not negatively impact public safety, insofar as the land use change is a logical extension of the land use pattern in the City. 3. General Plan Compatibility. The proposed General Plan amendment will be compatible with the General Plan, insofar as Neighborhood Commercial is an existing designation in the City and this change represents a furtherance of General Plan goals. it 5- G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\To11BrosGPA.wpd 03A. City Council Resolution 2002- General Plan Amendment 2001-081 - Toll Brothers, Inc. Adopted: February 5, 2002 4. Property Suitability. The property is generally flat, located at the corner of two major roadways, and suitable for commercial development. 5. Change in Circumstances. The continued development of the City requires the continued modification of the Land Use Map, and this amendment continues to support that development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby confirm the conclusion that the Environmental Assessment (EA 2001-437) assessed the environmental concerns of the General Plan Amendment; and, 3. That it does approve General Plan Amendment 2001-081 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as contained in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 5th day of February 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 03� G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\To11BrosGPA.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- General Plan Amendment 2001-081 - Toll Brothers, Inc. Adopted: February 5, 2002 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 54 033 G:\WPD0CS\CCReso-00A\Toi1BrosG PA.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- General Plan Amendment 2001-081 - Toll Brothers, Inc. Adopted: February 5, 2002 SOON G/OS - GOLF/OPEN SPACE LDR - LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .NC - NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL PROPOSED AVENUE 50 AVENUE 52 ' u UNj I.L Z 0 W Ili w AVENUE 52 EXHIBIT "A" EXISTING J G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\ToliBrosGPA.wpd 03 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA CHANGING 14 ACRES OF LAND CURRENTLY DESIGNATED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF AVENUE 52 AND JEFFERSON STREET CASE NO.: ZONE CHANGE 2001-104 TOLL BROTHERS INC. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5th day of February, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for Toll Brothers, Inc. for review of a Zone Change to allow Neighborhood Commercial zoning on a 14 acre site at the northeast corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings recommending approval of said Zone Change: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan, the Land Use Map for the General Plan and surrounding land use designations, ensuring land use compatibility. 2. The Zone Change will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, as it has been designed to be compatible with surrounding development, and conform with the City's standards and requirements. 3. The Zone Change is compatible with the City's Zoning Ordinance in that it proposes a Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center within the standards of the Zoning Ordinance and of Specific Plan 1990-016, Amendment No. 1 . 4. The Zone Change supports the orderly development of the City. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California that it does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. PURPOSE. To rezone a portion of land generally located at the northeastern corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street, known as Parcel No. 1 of Lot Line Adjustment 2001-355, from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and that it does approve General Plan Amendment 2001-081 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as contained in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of. 541 G:\WPDOCS\Ordinances\TollBros.WPD U3 Ordinance No. Zone Change 2001-104 - Toll Brothers, Inc. Adopted: February 5, 2002 SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL. This Zone Change has complied with the requirements of the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended) and adopted by City Council Resolution 83-68, in that the Community Development Director has determined that the proposed Zone Change will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4: POSTING. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three public places designated by Resolution of the City Council, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on this 5th day of February, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney U 3 U City of La Quinta, California G:\WPDOCS\Ordinances\TollBros.WPD Ordinance No. Zone Change 2001-104 - Toll Brothers, Inc. Adopted: February 5, 2002 .e.�. , .� GC - GOLF COURSE RL - LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL CN - NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL PROPOSED AVENUE 50 AvtNUE 52 EXHIBIT "A" EXISTING AVENUE 50 CN AVENUE 52 H W LU F- cc Z O _ca 0 G:\WPDOCS\Ordinances\ToIIBros.WPD 03r RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH RESIDENTIAL AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ON THE EAST SIDE OF JEFFERSON STREET, BETWEEN AVENUE 50 AND AVENUE 52 CASE NO. SPECIFIC PLAN 90-016, AMENDMENT #1 APPLICANT: TOLL BROTHERS, INC. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5th day of February 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Specific Plan 1990-016, Amendment #1, to allow the development of residential and neighborhood commercial land uses on the east side of Jefferson Street, between Avenue 50 and Avenue 52; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 8th day of January 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Specific Plan 1990-016, Amendment #1, to allow the development of residential and neighborhood commercial land uses on the east side of Jefferson Street, between Avenue 50 and Avenue 52; and WHEREAS, said Specific Plan has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-63), in that an Environmental Assessment (EA 2001-437) was prepared for Specific Plan 1990-016, Amendment #1 and found that although the proposed project will have environmental impacts, all impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings of approval to justify approving Specific Plan 90-016, Amendment #1: 1. That the proposed Specific Plan 90-016, Amendment #1 is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan in that the proposed project provides for a variety of land uses in an integrated community. 2. This Specific Plan will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare in that land uses have been thoughtfully planned and buffered to avoid land use incompatibilities. r,. C 3. That Specific Plan 90-016, Amendment #1 is compatible with the existing and J anticipated area development in that tit creates an integrated community. 033 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosSP.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 90-016, Amendment #1 - Toll Brothers, Inc. Adopted: February 5, 2002 4. That the project will be provided with adequate utilities and public services to ensure public health and safety. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby require compliance with the Conditions of Approval for the proposed Specific Plan; 3. That it does hereby confirm the conclusion that the Environmental Assessment (EA 2001-437) assessed the environmental concerns of this Specific Plan; and, 4. That it does approve Specific Plan 90-016, Amendment #1 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 5th day of February, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PEI A, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California J 033 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosSP.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 90-016, Amendment #1 - Toll Brothers, Inc. Adopted: February 5, 2002 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 043 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\ToliBrosSP.wpd CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 - TOLL BROTHERS FEBRUARY 5, 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. The project proponent shall submit amended documents, including all changes required by these conditions of approval within 30 days of City Council approval of the Specific Plan and/or prior to issuance of the grading permit whichever occurs first. 2. Any residential lot occurring within 300 feet of existing equestrian or agricultural land uses at the time of subdivision of that lot, shall be deed restricted to require notification by the seller to the purchaser of the lot that the lot is located within 300 feet of an existing equestrian or agricultural land use. 3. Table 2 on page 2.9, Table 4 on page 2.11 and Table 5 on page 2.12 shall be modified to show a density of 3.6 units per acre for all residential components of the Specific Plan. 4. All references to the landscape buffer at the northern boundary of the commercial shopping center site shall be changed to 50 feet if adjacent to residential. 5. The last sentence of item 3. on page 2.21 shall be deleted. 6. No signage is approved as part of this approval. The project proponent shall submit a master signage program prior to installation of any signage at the site. Page 2.23 of the Specific Plan shall be amended to include these requirements. 7. The reference to hillside trails on page 3.3, item B. shall be deleted. 8. The Table on page 3.7 shall be modified to show an off -golf lot frontage of 60 feet except flag lots, irregular cul-de-sacs, and curvilinear streets. 9. The asterisk on page 3.10, "Commercial Building Development Standards" Table shall read "Maximum footprint may vary 10%. 10. The words "residential hotel" shall be deleted from item A. on page 3.1 1 . 11. The words "subject to the regulations contained in Section 9.60.320 of the La Quinta Development Code" shall be added to item A., page 3.1 1, immediately following the words "fractional ownership residential uses."-- �JJJ G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\ToIIBrosSPCOA.wpd 1 04 J. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 12. Item C., page 3.15 shall be amended to reflect 6 foot walls in all residential areas, and 8 foot walls for commercial areas and for the property line adjacent to the lots on Avenue 50. 13. The landscaping plan shall include all frontages on City streets, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to completion of precise grading plan on any portion of the site, and shall include phasing plan for installation of perimeter landscaping. 14. Landscaping plans shall be submitted for review and approval for the casitas site, the golf clubhouse and maintenance facility, and the shopping center in conjunction with Site Development Permits for these components of the project. 15. The Specific Plan shall be amended to specify that the "living fence" planned for the eastern property line along the Coachella Canal shall be chain link fencing with a vine covering. 16. The Specific Plan Site Plan shall include a pedestrian, golf cart, and bicycle access between the residential/golf portion of the site, and the neighborhood commercial portion of the site. 17. The Specific Plan shall be amended to include an 18 foot, single story height limit for all homes on the eastern boundary of the proposed project site. 18. The golf course landscaping shall conform to the City's Water Conserving Landscape Ordinance. Prior to City Council hearing, the applicant shall prepare the calculations to determine whether the golf course design conforms to the City's water conserving landscaping ordinance. Should the calculations show that the golf course cannot conform to this standard, the City Council shall consider eliminating this condition. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CONDITIONS 19. The developer shall be required to install suitable facilities per district and Bureau of Reclamation standards to prohibit access to the Coachella Canal right of way. 20. The developer shall obtain an encroachment permit from the district prior to any construction within the right of way of the Coachella Canal. 5 3, G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosSPCOA.wpd 2 - 04 w CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 21. The developer shall provide land for additional facilities, which may include wells, reservoirs, and booster pumping stations. These sites shall be shown on the tract map as lots to be deeded to the district for such purpose. 22. The project site shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 55 and 82 of the district for sanitation service. 23. The developer shall receive clearances from the Bureau of Reclamation for any portion of lateral 120.8 which occur within the proposed project site prior to recordation of the Final Tract Map. 24. Water from the Coachella Canal shall be used as the primary source for irrigation of golf course and greenbelts within the project area. GENERAL 25. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Specific Plan, or any Tract Map processed thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 26. Any Tract Map related to, and processed concurrently with this Specific Plan, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code § § 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at, http://la-quinta.org. 27. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department J J G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosSPCOA.wpd 3 043 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) • Sunline Transit Agency 28. The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq., and 13.24.170, LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08-DWQ . A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs five (5) acres or more of land, or that disturbs less than five (5) acres of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than five (5) acres of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020, LQMC): 1. Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2. Temporary Sediment Control. 3. Wind Erosion Control. 4. Tracking Control. 5. Non -Storm Water Management. 6. Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All of applicant's erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off site grading being done in J �J relation to this project. 044 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosSPCOA.wpd 4 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 F. All approved project BMPs shall be maintained throughout the course of construction, and until all improvements have been accepted by the City. 29. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 30. The applicant shall block off the existing golf cart tunnel crossing under Jefferson Street in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. PROPERTY RIGHTS 31. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 32. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the related Tract Map, all public street right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 33. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1. Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) (Lot "A") - 50-foot half of the 100- foot right-of-way. 2. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) (Lot "B") - 60-foot half of the 120-foot right-of-way. 3. Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial) (Lot "C") - 55-foot half of the 1 10- foot right-of-way. 34. The applicant shall retain for private use on the related Tract Map, all private street right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 35. The private street right-of-ways to be retained for private use required for this . development include Lot "D" through and including Lot "Q": J Cj 045 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosSPCOA.wpd 5 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 A. PRIVATE STREETS 1, Lot "D" - (Divided Collector) 53-foot right-of-way. 2. Lots "E" through "Q" (Residential Streets) shall have a 39-foot right-of-way where double loaded, and may have a 35-foot right- of-way where single loaded. B. CUL DE SACS 1. Private Cul-de-sacs: Use Riverside County Standard 800 for symmetrical Cul De Sacs and Standard 800A for offset Cul De Sacs, with both having a 37-foot radius to the flowline of the 6" wedge curb. 36. Right-of-way geometry for standard knuckles and property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801, and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 37. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 38. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street right-of-ways shown on the approved tentative tract map are necessary prior to approval of the related Tract Map dedicating such right-of-ways, the applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-ways within 60 days of a written request by the City. 39. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the related Tract Map, a ten -foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. 40. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public right- of-ways as follows: A. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) - 20-foot from the R/W-P/L. B. Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) - 20-foot from the R/W-P/L. C. Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial - 20-foot from the R/W-P/L. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosSPCOA.wpd 6 U U CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Tract Map. 41. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Tract Map. 42. The applicant shall vacate all abutter's right -of -access to public streets and properties from all frontages along such public streets and properties, excepting those access points shown on the related Tract Map. 43. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 44. When an applicant proposes the vacation, or abandonment, of any existing right-of-way, or access easement, which will diminish the access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall provide an alternate right-of-way or access easement, to those properties, or notarized letters of consent from the affected property owners. 45. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the related tentative tract map and the date of recording of any related Tract Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. TRACT MAPS 46. Prior to the City's approval of any related Tract Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCAD files of such Tract Map that was approved by the City's map checker on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. Such files shall be in a standard AutoCAD format so as to be fully retrievable into a basic AutoCAD program. .. 5 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosSPCOA.wpd 7 047 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 Where the related Tract Map was not produced in an AutoCAD format, or produced in a file that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept a raster -image file of such Tract Map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these conditions of approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 47. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040, LQMC. 48. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. Off -Site Street Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical The street improvement plans shall include permanent traffic control and separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. B. Off -Site Street Median Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' C. Perimeter Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' D. On -Site Street Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical E. On -Site Rough Grading Plan: 1 if = 100' Horizontal F. On -Site Precise Grading Plan: 1 IT 30' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. 043 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosSPCOA.wpd 8 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1- foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. 49. The City maintains standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City resolution, the applicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes from the City. 50. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all complete, approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format which can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 51. Prior to the conditional approval of any related Tract Map, or the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 52. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Specific Plan's tentative tract map, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28, LQMC. 53. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. r- , r-, 560 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\ToIIBrosSPCOA.wpd 9 043 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 When improvements are phased through a "Phasing Plan," or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 54. Depending on the timing of the development of the tentative tract map related to this Specific Plan, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: (1) construct certain off -site improvements, (2) construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others, (3) reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this tract map, (4) secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others, or (5) to agree to any combination of these means, as the City may require. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of any related Tract Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 55. When improvements are to be secured through a SIA, and prior to any conditional approval of the related Tract Map by the City Council, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off -site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution, or ordinance. 561 1 if G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\ToIlBrosSPCOA.wpd 10 " U5� CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit costs shall be approved by the City Engineer. At the time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for conditional approval of the related Tract Map by the City Council, the applicant shall also submit one copy each of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " reduction of each page of the related Tract Map, along with a copy of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " Vicinity Map. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. Development -wide improvements shall not be agendized for final acceptance by the City Council until after the City receives confirmation from the telephone authority that the applicant has met all the requirements for telephone service to all lots within the development. GRADING 56. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 57. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 58. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, and C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\ToliBrosSPCOA.wpd 11 j, CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 A statement shall appear on the related Tract Map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. 59. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 60. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 61. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot from the building pads in adjacent developments. 62. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. The overall site grading adjacent to the Canal shall not exceed two feet from natural grading, and shall not exceed more than one foot over the entire length of the site. Building pad elevations on contiguous interior lots shall not differ by more than three feet except for lots that do not share a common street frontage, where the differential shall not exceed five feet. Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 63. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus three tenths of a foot from the elevations shown on the approved tentative tract map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Staff for a substantial conformance finding review. 64. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor. (l 7 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\ToliBrosSPCOA.wpd 12 v ti CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 65. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), LQMC. 66. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report prepared specifically for Mountain View Country Club. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 67. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. UTILITIES 68. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.1 10 (Utilities), LQMC. 69. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 70. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 71. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to the overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\ToIIBrosSPCOA.wpd 13 053 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 72. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access For Individual Properties And Developments), LQMC for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 73. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1 /8" batter and a minimum height of 0.1 ' . Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 74. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1. Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial; 100' R/W option): Widen the south side of the street along all frontage adjacent to the related tract boundary. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. Other significant new improvements required for installation in, or adjacent, to the subject right of way include: (a) 6-foot wide meandering sidewalk. (b) 12-foot wide landscaped median from the west boundary line to the east boundary of the tract. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosSPCOA.wpd 14 054 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 The pavement rehabilitation/reconstruction, and landscape median improvements, are eligible for reimbursement from the City's Development Impact Fee fund in accordance with policies established for that program. (c) Traffic signal at the projects main entry on Avenue 50 when warrants are met. Applicant is responsible for 50 % of the cost to design and install the traffic signal if complementing cost share from development on other side of street is available at time signal is required. Applicant shall enter into a SIA to post security for 50 % of the cost to design and install the traffic signal prior to issuance of an on -site grading permit; the security shall remain in full force and effect until the signal is actually installed by the applicant or the developer on the other side of the street. If the land on the other side of the street does not have an approved project connecting to the subject intersection, the applicant shall pay 100% of the cost to design and install the signalization for the resulting "T" intersection. If, however, the applicant's development trails the progress of the development on the other side of the street, the applicant shall be responsible for 50% of the cost as previously stated. 2. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial; 120' R/W) (a) Applicant shall construct median openings and turn pockets to accommodate the turning movements authorized by these Conditions of Approval. (b) Traffic signal at the projects main entry on Jefferson Street when warrants are met. Applicant is responsible for 50 % of the cost to design and install the traffic signal if complementing cost share from development on other side of street is available at time signal is required. Applicant shall enter into a SIA to post security for 50 % of the cost to design and install the traffic signal prior to issuance of an on -site grading permit; the security shall remain in full force and effect until the signal is actually installed by the applicant or the developer on the other side of the street. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosSPCOA.wpd 15 055 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 If the land on the other side of the street does not have an approved project connecting to the subject intersection, the applicant shall pay 100% of the cost to design and install the signalization for the resulting "T" intersection. If, however, the applicant's development trails the progress of the development on the other side of the street, the applicant shall be responsible for 50% of the cost as previously stated. The pavement rehabilitation/reconstruction and landscape median improvements are eligible for reimbursement from the City's Development Impact Fee fund in accordance with policies established for that program. 3. Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial; 1 10' R/W option): Widen the north side of the street along all frontage adjacent to the related tract boundary. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. Other significant new improvements required for installation in, or adjacent, to the subject right of way include: (a) 6-foot wide meandering sidewalk. (b) 18-foot wide landscaped median from the west boundary line to the west boundary of the Coachella Canal. The pavement rehabilitation/reconstruction, and landscape median improvements, are eligible for reimbursement from the City's Development Impact Fee fund in accordance with policies established for that program. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1 . Lot "D" - Construct full improvements within a 53-foot right-of- way, which shall be divided into two 20-foot traveled ways with a raised 10-foot center landscaped median. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\To11BrosSPCOA.wpd 16 0 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 2. Lots "E" through "Q" - Construct full 36-foot wide travel width improvements within a 39-foot right-of-way where the residential streets are double loaded. And construct full 32-foot wide travel width improvements within a 35-foot right-of-way where the residential streets are single loaded. C. PRIVATE CUL DE SACS 1. Private Cul-de-sacs shall be constructed to Riverside County Standard 800 for symmetrical Cul-de-sacs and Standard 800A for offset Cul-de-sacs, and both shall be constructed with a 37-foot curb radius, measured gutter flow -line to gutter flow -line. 75. All gated entries shall provide for a two -car minium stacking capacity for inbound traffic; and shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non -entry accepted vehicles.) Where a gated entry is proposed, the applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a scale of 1 " = 10', demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry into the development can safely make a "U" Turn back out onto Jefferson Street, Avenue 50 and Avenue 52, from those proposed gated entries. Two lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of each gated entry, one lane shall be dedicated for residents, and one lane for visitors. 76. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential 3.0" a.c./4.50" c.a.b. Collector 4.0"/5.00" Primary Arterial 4.5 "/6.00" Major Arterial 5.5 "/6.50" or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 77. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: f� r i (-L G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\ToliBrosSPCOA.wpd 17 057 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 A. Jefferson Street (Primary Entry): Full turn in, Full turn out. B. Avenue 50 (Secondary Entry): Full turn in, Full turn out. C. Avenue 52 (Secondary Entry): Left & Right turn in, Right turn out. 78. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 79. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 80. Standard knuckles and corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 81. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements. CONSTRUCTION 82. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphaltic concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include the test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include the most recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that the design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs have been approved. 83. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential tracts are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the tract or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. 053 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosSPCOA.wpd 18 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 LANDSCAPING 84. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC. 85. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. 86. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit the landscape plans for approval by the Community Development Department (CDD), prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking has been completed by CDD, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner, prior to submittal for signature by the City Engineer. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 87. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. PUBLIC SERVICES 88. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by Sunline Transit and approved by the City Engineer. QUALITY ASSURANCE 89. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 90. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. �r G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\ToliBrosSPCOA.wpd 19 053 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS SPECIFIC PLAN 1990-016, AMENDMENT #1 Adopted: FEBRUARY 5, 2002 91. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that the construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. 92. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. MAINTENANCE 93. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 94. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. FEES AND DEPOSITS 95. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. 5 t G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\Toll Bros SPCOA.wpd 20 0 G o RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 TO DIVIDE 364.73 ACRES INTO RESIDENTIAL LOTS, GOLF COURSE LOTS, AND A NUMBER OF LETTERED LOTS CASE NO.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 APPLICANT: TOLL BROTHERS, INC. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5th day of February, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for Toll Brothers, Inc., in order to subdivide 364.73 acres into residential lots, golf course lots and a number of lettered lots, generally located on the east side of Jefferson Street, between Avenue 50 and Avenue 52:and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 8th day of January, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for Toll Brothers, Inc., in order to subdivide 364.73 acres into residential lots, golf course lots and a number of lettered lots, generally located on the east side of Jefferson Street, between Avenue 50 and Avenue 52, more particularly described as: APN 772-250-002 & 003, 772-250-007 through 012, 772-270-001 through 004, 772-270-006 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings approving said Tentative Tract Map 30357: Finding Number 1 - Consistency with General Plan: A. The property is designated Low Density Residential. The Land Use Element of the General Plan encourages differing residential developments throughout the City. The project is consistent with the goals, policies and intent of the La Quinta General Plan Land Use Element (Chapter 2) insofar as low density residential development fits the character of the City's residential community. Finding Number 2 - Consistency with City Zoning Ordinance: A. The proposed development is consistent with the land uses specified in the Zoning Ordinance, as conditioned. �v G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosTT.wpd City Council Resolution 2001- Tentative Tract Map 30125 - Toll Brothers, Inc. Adopted: February 5, 2002. Finding Number 3 - Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act: A. Tentative Tract Map 30357 is subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act per Public Resources Code Section 65457(a). A Mitigated Negative Declaration (EA 2001-437) has been prepared. Finding Number 4 - Site Design: A. The proposed design of the subdivision conforms with the development standards found in the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance by creating single family lots and golf course lots. B. The site is physically suitable for the proposed land division, as the area is generally flat and without physical constraints, and the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the low density residential character of the community. Findina Number 5 - Site Improvements: A. Infrastructure improvements such as gas, electric, sewer and water will service the site in underground facilities as required. No adverse impacts have been identified based on letters of response from affected public agencies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby confirm the conclusion that Environmental Assessment 2001-437 assessed the environmental concerns of this Tentative Tract Map; and, 4. That it does approve Tentative Tract Map 30357 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 5th day of February, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: 062 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosTT.wpd City Council Resolution 2001- Tentative Tract Map 30125 - Toll Brothers, Inc. Adopted: February 5, 2002. ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PEIVA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 063 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 - TOLL BROTHERS FEBRUARY 5, 2002 GENERAL 1 . The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this tentative tract map, or any Tract Map thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This tentative tract map, and any Tract Map thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code § § 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at, http://la-quinta.org. 3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) • Sunline Transit Agency The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. J G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosTTCOA.wpd 1 064 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 4. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq., and 13.24.170, LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08-DWQ . A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs five (5) acres or more of land, or that disturbs less than five (5) acres of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than five (5) acres of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020, LQMC): i. Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). ii. Temporary Sediment Control. iii. Wind Erosion Control. iv. Tracking Control. V. Non -Storm Water Management. vi. Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All of applicant's erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off site grading being done in relation to this project. F. All approved project BMPs shall be maintained throughout the course of construction, and until all improvements have been accepted by the City. 5. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 6. The applicant shall block off the existing golf cart tunnel crossing un' Jefferson Street in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. U6mi G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosTTCOA.wpd 2 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 PROPERTY RIGHTS 7. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 8. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Tract Map all public street right- of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 9. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1 . Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) (Lot "A") - 50-foot half of the 100- foot right-of-way. 2. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) (Lot "B") - 60-foot half of the 120-foot right-of-way. 3. Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial) (Lot "C") - 55-foot half of the 1 10- foot right-of-way. 10. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Tract Map all private street right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 11. The private street right-of-ways to be retained for private use required for this development include Lot "D" through and including Lot "Q": A. PRIVATE STREETS 1 . Lot "D" - (Divided Collector) 53-foot right-of-way. 2. Lots "E" through "Q" (Residential Streets) shall have a 39-foot right-of-way where double loaded, and may have a 35-foot right- of-way where single loaded. 5 l� ; 000 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosTTCOA.wpd 3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 B. CUL DE SACS 1. Private Cul-de-sacs: Use Riverside County Standard 800 for symmetrical Cul De Sacs and Standard 800A for offset Cul De Sacs, with both having a 37-foot radius to the flowline of the 6" wedge curb. 12. Right-of-way geometry for standard knuckles and property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801, and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 13. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 14. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street right-of-ways shown on the approved tentative tract map are necessary prior to approval of the Tract Map dedicating such right-of-ways, the applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-ways within 60 days of a written request by the City. 15. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Tract Map a ten -foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. 16. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public right- of-ways as follows: A. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) - 20-foot from the R/W-P/L. B. Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) - 20-foot from the R/W-P/L. C. Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial - 20-foot from the R/W-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Tract Map. 5 8 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\ToliBrosTTCOA.wpd 4 067 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 17. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Tract Map. 18. The applicant shall vacate all abutter's right -of -access to public streets and properties from all frontages along such public streets and properties, excepting those access points shown on the Tract Map. 19. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 20. When an applicant proposes the vacation, or abandonment, of any existing right-of-way, or access easement, which will diminish the access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall provide an alternate right-of-way or access easement, to those properties, or notarized letters of consent from the affected property owners. 21. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the tentative tract map and the date of recording of any Tract Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. TRACT MAPS 22. Prior to the City's approval of a Tract Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCAD files of the Tract Map that was approved by the City's map checker on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. Such files shall be in a standard AutoCAD format so as to be fully retrievable into a basic AutoCAD program. Where a Tract Map was not produced in an AutoCAD format, or produced in a file that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept a raster -image file of such Tract Map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these conditions of approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosTTCOA.wpd 5 063 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 23. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040, LQMC. 24. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. Off -Site Street Plan: 1 if = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical The street improvement plans shall include permanent traffic control and separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. B. Off -Site Street Median Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' C. Perimeter Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' D. On -Site Street Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical E. On -Site Rough Grading Plan: 1 " = 100' Horizontal F. On -Site Precise Grading Plan: 1 " = 30' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1- foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. 25. The City maintains standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City resolution, the applicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes from the City. 58v G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\Tol[BrosTTCOA.wpd 6 063 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 26. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all complete, approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format which can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 27. Prior to the conditional approval of any Tract Map, or the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 28. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this tentative tract map, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28, LQMC. 29. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. When improvements are phased through a "Phasing Plan," or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 581 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosTTCOA.wpd 7 070 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 30. Depending on the timing of the development of this tentative tract map, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: (1) construct certain off -site improvements, (2) construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others, (3) reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this tract map, (4) secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others, or (5) to agree to any combination of these means, as the City may require. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Tract Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 31. When improvements are to be secured through a SIA, and prior to any conditional approval of the Tract Map by the City Council, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off -site improvements, 'including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution, or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit costs shall be approved by the City Engineer. At the time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for conditional approval of the Tract Map by the City Council, the applicant shall also submit one copy each of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " reduction of each page of the Tract Map, along with a copy of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " Vicinity Map. J`V••J � G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosTTCOA.wpd g 0 7 j. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. Development -wide improvements shall not be agendized for final acceptance by the City Council until the City receives confirmation from the telephone authority that the applicant has met all the requirements for telephone service to all lots within the development. GRADING 32. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 33. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 34. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, and C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on the Tract Map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. rj G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\ToliBrosTTCOA.wpd 9 J 0 ��" CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 35. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 36. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 37. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot from the building pads in adjacent developments. 38. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. The overall site grading adjacent to the Canal shall not exceed two feet from natural grading, and shall not exceed more than one foot over the entire length of the site. Building pad elevations on contiguous interior lots shall not differ by more than three feet except for lots that do not share a common street frontage, where the differential shall not exceed five feet. Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 39. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus three tenths of a foot from the elevations shown on the approved tentative tract map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Staff for a substantial conformance finding review. 40. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosTTCOA.wpd 10 073 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 DRAINAGE 41. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), LQMC. 42. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report prepared specifically for Mountain View Country Club. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 43. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. UTILITIES 44. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.1 10 (Utilities), LQMC. 45. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 46. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 47. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 8813' G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\ToliBrosTTCOA.wpd 11 074 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 48. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access For Individual Properties And Developments), LQMC for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 49. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1 /8" batter and a minimum height of 0.1'. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 50. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial; 100' R/W option): Widen the south side of the street along all frontage adjacent to the tract boundary. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. Other significant new improvements required for installation in, or adjacent, to the subject right of way include: (a) 6-foot wide meandering sidewalk. (b) 12-foot wide landscaped median from the west boundary line to the east boundary of the tract. (c) Traffic signal at the projects main entry on Avenue 50 when warrants are met. Applicant is responsible for 50 % of the cost to design and install the traffic signal if complementing cost share from development on other side of street is available at time signal is required. Applicant shall enter into a SIA to post security for 50 % of the cost to design and install the traffic signal prior to issuance of an on -site grading permit; the security shall remain in full force and effect until the signal is actually installed by the applicant or the developer on the other side of the street. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosTTCOA.wpd 12 ' CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 If the land on the other side of the street does not have an approved project connecting to the subject intersection, the applicant shall pay 100% of the cost to design and install the signalization for the resulting "T" intersection. If, however, the applicant's development trails the progress of the development on the other side of the street, the applicant shall be responsible for 50% of the cost as previously stated. The pavement rehabilitation/reconstruction, and landscape median improvements, are eligible for reimbursement from the City's Development Impact Fee fund in accordance with policies established for that program. 2) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial; 120' R/W) Applicant shall construct median openings and turn pockets to accommodate the turning movements authorized by these Conditions of Approval. (a) Traffic signal at the projects main entry on Jefferson Street when warrants are met. Applicant is responsible for 50 % of the cost to design and install the traffic signal if complementing cost share from development on other side of street is available at time signal is required. Applicant shall enter into a SIA to post security for 50 % of the cost to design and install the traffic signal prior to issuance of an on -site grading permit; the security shall remain in full force and effect until the signal is actually installed by the applicant or the developer on the other side of the street. If the land on the other side of the street does not have an approved project connecting to the subject intersection, the applicant shall pay 100% of the cost to design and install the signalization for the resulting "T" intersection. If, however, the applicant's development trails the progress of the development on the other side of the street, the applicant shall be responsible for 50% of the cost as previously stated. The pavement rehabilitation/reconstruction and landscape median improvements are eligible for reimbursement from the City's Development Impact Fee fund in accordance with policies established for that program. �' 07u G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\ToliBrosTTCOA.wpd 13 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 3) Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial; 1 10' R/W option): Widen the north side of the street along all frontage adjacent to the tract boundary. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. Other significant new improvements required for installation in, or adjacent, to the subject right of way include: (a) 6-foot wide meandering sidewalk. (b) 18-foot wide landscaped median from the west boundary line to the west boundary of the Coachella Canal. The pavement rehabilitation/reconstruction, and landscape median improvements, are eligible for reimbursement from the City's Development Impact Fee fund in accordance with policies established for that program. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1. Lot "D" - Construct full improvements within a 53-foot right-of- way, which shall be divided into two 20-foot traveled ways with a 10-foot center landscaped median. 2. Lots "E" through "Q" - Construct full 36-foot wide travel width improvements within a 39-foot right-of-way where the residential streets are double loaded. And construct full 32-foot wide travel width improvements within a 35-foot right-of-way where the residential streets are single loaded. C. PRIVATE CUL DE SACS 1) Private Cul-de-sacs shall be constructed to Riverside County Standard 800 for symmetrical Cul-de-sacs and Standard 800A for offset Cul-de-sacs, and both shall be constructed with a 37-foot curb radius, measured gutter flow -line to gutter flow -line. 51. All gated entries shall provide for a two -car minium stacking capacity �� .�_ inbound traffic; and shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non -en y accepted vehicles.) 077 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\ToliBrosTTCOA.wpd 14 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 Where a gated entry is proposed, the applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a scale of 1 " = 10', demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry into the development can safely make a "U" Turn back out onto Jefferson Street, Avenue 50 and Avenue 52, from the gated entry. Two lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of each gated entry, one lane shall be dedicated for residents, and one lane for visitors. 52. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential 3.0" a.c./4.50" c.a.b. Collector 4.0"/5.00" Primary Arterial 4.5"/6.00" Major Arterial 5.5 "/6.50" or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 53. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Jefferson Street (Primary Entry): Full turn in, Full turn out. B. Avenue 50 (Secondary Entry): Full turn in, Full turn out. C. Avenue 52 (Secondary Entry): Left & Right turn in, Right turn out. 54. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 55. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 56. Standard knuckles and corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approv o by the City Engineer. J ") `� 073 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosTTCOA.wpd 15 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 57. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements. CONSTRUCTION 58. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphaltic concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include the test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include the most recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that the design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs have been approved. 59. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential tracts are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the tract or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPING 60. The. applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC. 61. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. 62. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit the landscape plans for approval by the Community Development Department (CDD), prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking has been completed by CDD, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner, prior to submittal for signature by the City Engineer. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\ToliBrosTTCOA.wpd 16 (17 3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 63. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. PUBLIC SERVICES 64. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by Sunline Transit and approved by the City Engineer. QUALITY ASSURANCE 65. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 66. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 67. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that the construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. 68. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. MAINTENANCE 69. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 70. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access 5 9 drives, and sidewalks. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosTTCOA.wpd CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 FEES AND DEPOSITS 71. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CONDITIONS 72. The developer shall be required to install suitable facilities per district and Bureau of Reclamation standards to prohibit access to the Coachella Canal right of way. 73. The developer shall obtain an encroachment permit from the district prior to any construction within the right of way of the Coachella Canal. 74. The developer shall provide land for additional facilities, which may include wells, reservoirs, and booster pumping stations. These sites shall be shown on the tract map as lots to be deeded to the district for such purpose. 75. The project site shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 55 and 82 of the district for sanitation service. 76. The developer shall receive clearances from the Bureau of Reclamation for any portion of lateral 120.8 which occur within the proposed project site prior to recordation of the Final Tract Map. 77. Water from the Coachella Canal shall be used as the primary source for irrigation of golf course and greenbelts within the project area. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 78. For residential areas, approved standard fire hydrants, located at each intersection and spaced 330-feet apart with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165-feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for a 2- hour duration at 20 PSI 79. For any buildings with public access, i.e., recreational halls, clubhouses, etc., Super fire hydrants are to be placed no closer than 25-feet and not more than 165-feet from any portion of the first floor of said building following approved travel ways around the exterior of the building. Minimum fire flow for these areas would be 1500 GPM for a 2-hour duration at 20 PSI. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\ToliBrosTTCOA.wpd 18 f� CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 80. Any commercial or public buildings are to have concurrent plan check through the Fire Department, i.e., clubhouses, etc. 81. Water plans are to be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval. 82. Blue dot retro-reflectors shall be placed in the street eight inches from centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 83. Cul-de-sacs, dead-end streets are not to exceed 1320-feet in length. This is a safety issue and deals with traffic loading when residents are exiting during an emergency (evacuation). Any roadways exceeding this distance must have a secondary access. This access may be restricted to emergency vehicles only if so desired. 84. City of La Quinta Ordinance requires all buildings, other than single family, 5,000 square feet or larger, to be fully sprinkled. NFPA 13 Standard. If required, a sprinkler plan shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. 85. All structures shall be accessible from an approved roadway to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior of the first floor. 86. Gate entrances shall be at least two feet wider than the width of the travel lanes, serving that gate. Any gate providing access from a road to a driveway shall be located at least 35-feet setback from the roadway and shall open to allow a vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic on the road. Where a one- way road with a single traffic lane provides access to a gate entrance, a 38-foot turning radius shall be used. 87. Gates may be automatic or manual and shall be equipped with a rapid entry system (KNOX). Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Automatic gate pins shall be rated with a shear pin force, not to exceed 30 pounds. Gates activated by the rapid entry system shall remain open until closed by the rapid entry system. 88. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. 89. The applicant/developer shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. J 4 r G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosTTCOA.wpd 19 ( ) 8 02 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TOLL BROTHERS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30357 FEBRUARY 5, 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 90. Any residential lot occurring within 300-feet of existing equestrian or agricultural land uses at the time of subdivision of that lot, shall be deed restricted to require notification by the seller to the purchaser of the lot that the lot is located within 300-feet of an existing equestrian or agricultural land use. 91. The landscaping plan shall include all frontages on City streets, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to completion of precise grading plan on any portion of the site, and shall include phasing plan for installation of perimeter landscaping. ,A VP G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TollBrosTTCOA.wpd 20 '-83 ATTACHMENT #1 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 A. Condition #38.E.: Secondary Entry into Parcel 2 Parking area (Avenue 50, 810-foot W. of C/L Intersection with Jefferson Street): Right turn in, Right turn out. B. Condition #48: Storm water will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The meandering public sidewalk adjacent to Pad "C" shall be moved closer to the street in order to allow up to three feet of berming, east of the adjacent retention basin. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: Commissioner Kirk. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Chairman Abels recessed the meeting at 8:29 p.m. and reconvened at 8:35 p.m. E. Environmental Assessment 2001-437 General Plan Amendment 2001- 081, Zone Change 2001-104, Specific Plan 90-016 Amendment #1 and Tentative Tract Map 30357; a request of the Toll Brothers, Inc. for approval of an Environmental Assessment; a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to change 14 acres at the northeastern corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 52 from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial; a Specific Plan Amendment modifying standards and guidelines for the construction of 490 single family residence, 60 fractional ownership units, an 18 hole golf course and a 14 acre neighborhood shopping center; and a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide portions of the project area into 178 residential lots, lots for future residential subdivision, casitas development, golf course, maintenance and clubhouse facility lots, and other lettered lots for streets and other facilities. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste, presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if additional buffering should be considered between this project and the equestrian uses on the northern portion of this project. NWP G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-8-02.wpd 12 0 $ ,J Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 3. Commissioner Kirk asked at what point was this area to be zoned Neighborhood Commercial. Staff stated that when the land use analysis was made for the General Plan, it was designated at that time. Commissioner Kirk asked why the golf course was not being required to use canal water. Staff stated it was conditioned to use canal water. The Specific Plan had not been edited to meet the conditions. Commissioner Kirk asked if living fences were being allowed in specific plans. Staff stated yes. 4. Commissioner Robbins stated the canal should be referenced as the Coachella Valley Canal in the Specific Plan. 5. Commissioner Tyler questioned the number of accesses in the Specific Plan in proximity to the round -about at Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street. Staff noted they were right in, right out accesses only. Commissioner Tyler pointed out some inconsistencies in the Specific Plan. 6. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Forrest Haag, representing Toll Bros., gave a presentation on the project. He stated his concern regarding Condition #8, and asked that it be amended to add, "with the exception of flag logs, irregular cul-de-sac lots, and lots fronting on curve streets." Condition #13, they agree with staff's recommendation and ask that it be amended to add, "the improvements to those areas shall be adjacent to residential or commercial development as they take place." On Condition #19, they would like to request clarification on the lateral location. Condition #20 add, "....use as a primary source....". Condition #26, delete any reference to the tunnel. Condition #44.E., they are requesting to use a "100 scale plan" and last paragraph changed to read, "to allow perimeter walls not to be required on rough grading plan mandatorily." Condition #57, rather than keeping the pads within one foot, leave them where they are in natural grade and create slope banks on their property to deal with the impacts as well as the perimeter walls. Condition #71, they are requesting to use 20 scale plans. 7. Commissioner Robbins asked if the applicant would object to having a condition that the golf course conform to City's Landscape Ordinance as far as water usage. Mr. Haag stated yes; it would be the first in the Valley. This is a flat -land golf course which makes it more difficult. Discussion followed 9 regardi different golf courses. 4 080% G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-8-02.wpd 13 0 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 8. Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment. Mr. Robert Cunnard, 80-225 Avenue 50, stated he was the landowner adjacent to the project on the west side. His concern was the existing 20-foot easement that runs the length of his property; what happens to this easement? Which side will the wall be on? Also, what will happen to the water standpipe that services his property? Will Avenue 50 be widened only in front of this site or will the entire length be widened? How will the dust be controlled during the grading? Mr. Forest Haag stated the easement is owned by Toll Bros and will probably go away. Mr. Cunnard stated it also serves the back part of his property. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the easement was part of the Kanlian property and is now part of the Toll Bros property and will go away with the development of the site. 9. Mr. Wells Marvin, 79-258 Cetrino, owns lot two at the Polo Estates, stated his concern was with the height of the houses to be constructed as it is not clear in the Specific Plan. He would like a limit of 20 feet. The Polo Estates houses cannot build above 18- feet. Also, the height of living fence. If it is placed at the level of the top of the canal it will block their view. If that fence is put at the bottom of the slope it will have no additional impact. He is also concerned about the vacant pads and suggested they be sodded and kept green or landscaped in some way to control the dust. Another concern is that there will be no maintenance facility built within a reasonable period of time. The street improvements need to be done on a time frame that is within 1-3 years of construction. Finally, there should be at least a golf cart entrance to the Neighborhood Commercial site. 10. Mr. Jack Kalvin, La Quinta Polo Estates, asked for a definition of a living fence. He would like to note he is opposed to a living fence and if it should be built, it should be below the canal height to not obscure their view. There needs to be a control on any berming heights. Is it possible for the Homeowners' Association to receive more defined plans. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the plans are always available at City Hall for review. Mr. Kalvin asked if the houses would be constructed at the height of the canal height. Staff stated there are no house plans to review at this time. Another public hearing would be held when the tract is mapped and building elevations were available. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-8-02.wpd 14 087 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 11. Mr. Dan Hammonds, 50-325 Vista Montana, La Quinta Polo Estates, stated he was concerned with the house heights adjacent to his property. 12. Mr. Jay Baden, 47-415 Via Cordova, stated he purchased property at Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street and is glad to have the golf course, but believes there is enough commercial at this location without allowing the rezoning of this site. 13. Mr. Wells Marvin stated the grading is before the Commission at this time. There is an existing grade now and if they are allowed to raise that grade it can obstruct their view. It should not be allowed to go higher than one foot. 14. Mr. Chris Bergh, MDS Consulting, engineers for the project, stated that where they are adjacent to La Quinta Polo Estates they are within one foot of the existing pad elevation for the adjacent lots. The grades for future development are shown on the tentative map. If they are to maintain retention requirements they will need more than one foot. The existing ground along their entire eastern border varies by only one foot. To get proper drainage on streets you cannot stay within one foot for the entire easterly boundary. They are staying within a couple feet and that is what they are proposing. In regard to the irrigation lateral, this line will be relocated and will continue to supply the irrigation water to the existing lots as it does now. 15. Commissioner Kirk asked that the grade elevations on the eastern boundary be explained. Mr. Bergh stated the pads are about 26- feet. Discussion followed regarding elevations and heights of the houses. Mr. Haag stated the building heights are limited to 28- feet. 16. Commissioner Kirk asked about a maintenance facility. Mr. Haag noted it is located on Lot 90. It will be built in conjunction with the golf course development. 17. There being no further public comment, the public participation portion of the public hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 15 083 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 18. Commissioner Tyler stated he too was not in favor of a living fence and suggested there be an eight foot wall height on the northern property line for a buffer from the equestrian uses. Once the site is graded, there should be some sort of permanent dust control provided. 19. Commissioner Kirk stated that in regard to the grade differential, he would suggest the eastern boundary be conditioned to keep the grade within two feet of the native grade. With respect to the living fence, he asked if it is a fence with a vine, or a hedge. Mr. Haag stated it would be a six foot chain length fence with a plant that would grow on it. The proposed fence would be at the bottom of the grade. Commissioner Kirk stated he had concerns about sodding the lots due to the water usage, but there should be a soil stabilizer. Also, what is staff's recommendation in regard to timing the development. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated it will be bonded for all the off -site improvements with the first phase of the map. The City does not release the bonds until the first phase map is completed. The City does allow that to be extended for a period of time if needed. 20. Commissioner Robbins stated he agreed that there needs to be dust control measures and the project is conditioned to do so. The berm is another issue. In some places where there will be a wall it will be six feet higher than the top of the existing road and it is unavoidable. In regard to the water, he believes there is a way to have a grass golf course that can meet the Landscape Ordinance. Discussion followed regarding the Landscape Ordinance in relation to a golf course. 21. Commissioner Tyler asked if the Commission should not consider lowering the height of the houses from 28-feet. Consultant Planner Nicole Criste suggested the houses along the eastern boundary be limited to 18 feet. 22. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-007 recommending adoption of Environmental Assessment 2001-437. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-8-02.wpd 16 083 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 23. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-008 recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 2001-081, as submitted. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 24. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-009 recommending approval of Zone Change 2001-104, as submitted. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 25. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-009 recommending approval of Specific Plan 90-016, Amendment #1, as amended. A. Condition #4: "All references to the landscape buffer at the northern boundary of the commercial shopping center site shall be changed to 50 feet if adjacent to residential." B. Condition #8: add, "...except flag lots, irregular cul-de-sacs, and curvilinear streets." C. Condition #12: "Item C., page 3.15 shall be amended to reflect 6 foot walls in all residential areas, and 8 foot walls for commercial areas and for the property line adjacent to the lots on Avenue 50." D. Condition #13: "The landscaping plan shall include all frontages on City streets, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to completion of precise grading plan on any portion of the site, and shall include phasing plan for installation of perimeter landscaping." E. Condition #14: "The landscaping plan shall include all frontages on City streets, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to completion of precise grading plan on any portion of the site, and shall include phasing plan for installation * of perimeter landscaping." F. Condition # 16: "The Specific Plan Site Plan shall include a pedestrian, golf cart, and bicycle access between the t t� J G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 17 J 033 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 residential/golf portion of the site, and the neighborhood commercial portion of the site." G. Condition #18: "The golf course landscaping shall conform to the City's water conserving landscape ordinance. Prior to City Council hearing, the applicant shall prepare the calculations to determine whether the golf course design conforms to the City's water conserving landscaping ordinance. Should the calculations show that the golf course cannot conform to this standard, the City Council shall consider eliminating this condition." H. Condition #24: Water from the Coachella Canal shall be used as the primary source for irrigation of golf course and greenbelts within the project area. I. Condition #27: Change to CVUSD J. Condition #30: "The applicant shall block off the existing golf cart tunnel crossing under Jefferson Street in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer." K. Condition #48.E.: "100 scale". L. Condition #62: "The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. The overall site grading adjacent to the Canal shall not exceed two feet from natural grading, and shall not exceed more than one foot over the entire length of the site." M. Condition #74.A.(c): Traffic signal at the projects main entry on Avenue 50 when warrants are met. Applicant is responsible for 50 % of the cost to design and install the traffic signal if complementing cost share from development on other side of street is available at time signal is required. Applicant shall enter into a SIA to post security for 50 % of the cost to design and install the traffic signal prior to issuance of an on -site grading permit; the security shall remain in full force and effect until the signal is actually installed by the applicant or the developer on the other side of the street. If the land on the other side of the street does not have an approved project connecting to the subject intersection, the applicant shall pay 100% of the cost to design and install the signalization for the resulting "T" intersection. If, however, the applicant's development trails the progress of the development on the other side of the street, the applicant shall be responsible for 50% of the cost as previously stated. 60 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-8-02.wpd 18 (] Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 26. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-010 recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 30357, as amended. A. Condition #3: Change to CVUSD B. Condition #6: Change to read, "The applicant shall block off the existing golf cart tunnel crossing under Jefferson Street in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer." C. Condition #24.E.: Change to 100 feet. D. Condition #38: "The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. The overall site grading adjacent to the Canal shall not exceed two feet from natural grading, and shall not exceed more than one foot over the entire length of the site." E. Condition #50.A.(c): Traffic signal at the projects main entry on Avenue 50 when warrants are met. Applicant is responsible for 50 % of the cost to design and install the traffic signal if complementing cost share from development on other side of street is available at time signal is required. Applicant shall enter into a SIA to post security for 50 % of the cost to design and install the traffic signal prior to issuance of an on -site grading permit; the security shall remain in full force and effect until the signal is actually installed by the applicant or the developer on the other side of the street. If the land on the other side of the street does not have an approved project connecting to the subject intersection, the applicant shall pay 100% of the cost to design and install the signalization for the resulting "T" intersection. If, however, the applicant's development trails the progress of the development on the other side of the street, the applicant shall be responsible for 50% of the cost as previously stated. F. Add Condition #90: "Any residential lot occurring within 300-feet of existing equestrian or agricultural land uses at the time of subdivision of that lot, shall be deed restricted to require notification by the seller to the purchaser of the lot that the lot is located within 300-feet of an existing equestrian or agricultural land use." 09' G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 19 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 G. Add Condition #91: "The landscaping plan shall include all frontages on City streets, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to completion of precise grading plan on any portion of the site, and shall include phasing plan for installation of perimeter landscaping." ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. H. Site Development Permit 2001-722; a request of Wayne Price, Price's Nursery and Supply, Inc. for review of development plans for a 3,600 square foot equipment storage building and convert a mobile home residence into an office for the property located at 80-420 Avenue 52. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Robbins asked about the Fire Department conditions to provide fire flow that are being required and there is no domestic water to the site. How is the applicant going to comply with these conditions. 3. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Chuck McBride, architect for the project, stated the water line proposed for Avenue 52 is on hold. The Fire Marshal was asked how they could achieve this if there was no water line on Avenue 52 as it would be cost prohibitive for the applicant to supply it. The alternate was suggested that a temporary supply could be taken from the canal, set up a pump and when the water was available on Avenue 52 they would then connect. This they could meet under a temporary condition. 4. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public hearing and opened the meeting to Commission discussion. 6��'�, G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 20 093 4LJAk4 ;t - G- Q MEMORANDUM Date: February 5, 2002 To: La Quinta City Council Members From: rQRREST K. MAAG, ASLA,INC. LANDSCAPE ARCRITECTURE - LAND PLANNING 1254 North Coast Highway Laguna Beach, California 92651 ph (949) 376-9066 fax (949) 376-9067 email: fkh@forrestkhaagasla.com Subject: Mountain View Country Club - Line of Sight Photo -Illustrations Please find enclosed two illustrations addressing the Mountain View Country Club "Line of Sight Photo -Illustrations." These Illustrations are provided to assist in understanding the Mountain View Country Club application for low density residential land use adjacent to the current low density residential development within the Polo Estates. Exhibit 1 shows the existing view condition from a typical Polo Estate lot looking west. This view is taken from the vacant Lot # 7 in the North Polo Estates. Exhibit 2 is a westerly view taken from the same vacant Lot in the Polo Estates which illustrates the proposed "built condition" with a perimeter wall, one and two story units along the proposed interior street. Exhibit 3 and 4 is a westerly view taken from a residential lot pad in the north Polo Estates looking over a neighboring "built condition" which illustrates the Neighbor -to Neighbor on tract mountain view being blocked within the Polo Estates currently. This view illustrates a separation potential of approximately 185' - however the unit is not yet built. The typical separation of constructed units in the Polo Estates to the proposed units in Mountain View County Club is approximately 265' . fORREST K. NAAG, ASLA, INC. LANDSCAPE ARCMITECTURE - LAND PLANNING 1251 N. COAST MIQHWAY LACUNA BtACM, CA 92651 F. (9i9) 576-9066 r: (9't9) 576-9067 t: rKm@rOKKtSTKMAAGASLA.COM MEMBER ASLA AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 5, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Public Hearing on Environmental Assessment 2001- PUBLIC HEARING: 431, Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 232 (SCH #9164450613), General Plan Amendment 2001-080, Zone Change 2001-103, for the Property Bounded by Avenue 58 on the North, Avenue 50 on the South, Madison Street on the West and Monroe Street on the East and the East Side of Monroe Street, Generally South of Avenue 59 (extended) to Avenue 61, Generally a Distance of One Half Mile at Avenue 59 (extended) and a Distance of One Quarter Mile to Avenue 61. Applicant: T D Development and City of La Quinta RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council Certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-431. 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council Certifying an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 232 (SCH #9164450613). 3. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment 2001-080. 4. Move to take up Ordinance No. approving Zone Change 2001-103 by title and number only and waive further reading. Move to introduce Ordinance No. on first reading. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. S G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\TDDes.wpd BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The property being considered includes a portion of the Coral Mountain Specific Plan (Attachment 1), totaling 396 acres, and additional lands outside the Specific Plan boundary totaling 420 acres. The land is currently either vacant or in agriculture. The applications being considered are necessary prior to annexation into the City. Project Request: The applications under consideration include: 1 . An Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 232 (SCH # 9164450613), certified by the County of Riverside for Specific Plan 218, to consider the environmental impacts associated with annexation of 396 acres into the City of La Quinta. 2. An Environmental Assessment (EA 2001-431) to consider the environmental impacts associated with annexation of 420 acres outside the Specific Plan boundaries into the City of La Quinta. 3. A General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to change 173.5 acres of currently designated Medium Density Residential land to Low Density Residential; 74.9 acres of Medium -High Density Residential to Medium Density Residential; 133.3 acres of Open Space to Golf Course; 10 acres of Commercial to Community Commercial; 4.2 acres of Commercial to Neighborhood Commercial; and 420 acres of Agriculture to Low Density Residential. All these changes are required as part of the annexation process by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). Project Description The land uses proposed for the Specific Plan property are equivalent to those which the Specific Plan allows. Under the County Medium Density Residential land use category, two to five units are allowed. The City's Low Density Residential category allows 0 to 4 units per acre. The development planned within the Low Density Residential areas will not exceed 4 units per acre. The land uses proposed within the Medium High Density Residential under the Specific Plan were planned not to exceed eight units per acre. This density is consistent with the City's Medium Density Residential land use designation. The land uses requested are therefore consistent, and represent an extension of the land use pattern in the City. In addition to the lands within the Specific Plan boundary, the City proposes to annex a total of 420 acres which are adjacent to the Specific Plan area. The Specific Plan is of an irregular shape, and these lands represent the balance of the property between Avenue 58 and Avenue 60, Monroe and Madison Streets. The lands are currently designated Agriculture under the County General Plan. As part of the City, however, 6 0 G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\TDDes.wpd they would be designated Low Density Residential, which is a logical extension for lands which are adjacent to an approved mixed use project. These lands will continue in agriculture until such time as the land owners choose to develop the properties. The Low Density Residential land use category is consistent with the properties within the Specific Plan, as well as properties immediately north of Avenue 58, which are already within the City limits and also similarly designated and developed. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed these applications at its regularly scheduled meeting of January 22, 2002 (Attachment 1). After considering public comment, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the applications. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The findings necessary to approve this request can be made, and are included in the attached Resolutions. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council Certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-431. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council Certifying an Addendum to - Environmental Impact Report No. 232 (SCH #9164450613). Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment 2001-080. Move to take up Ordinance No. approving Zone Change 2001-103 by title and number only and waive further reading. Move to introduce Ordinance No. on first reading; or 2. Do not adopt the above Resolutions; or 3. Remand the applications to the Planning Commission for further consideration; or 4. Continue the request and provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Jerr Her an Co muni y Development Director G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\TDDes.wpd Approved for sub missio by, Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Planning Commission Minutes of January 22, 2002 61 G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\TDDes.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING AN ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT #232 PREPARED FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-080, ZONE CHANGE 2001-103, PRE -ANNEXATION GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING OF A PORTION OF SPECIFIC PLAN 218 CASE: ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT #232 APPLICANT: T D DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 5th of February 2002 hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider an addendum to Environmental Impact Report #232 for General Plan Amendment 2001-080, Zone Change 2001-103 for the pre -annexation designation of a portion of Specific Plan 218 located east of Madison Street, north of Avenue 60, south of Avenue 58 and west of Monroe; and the east side of Monroe Street, between Avenue 59 and Avenue 61; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 8th of January 2002 hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider an addendum to Environmental Impact Report #232 for General Plan Amendment 2001- 080, Zone Change 2001-103 for the pre -annexation designation of a portion of Specific Plan 218 located east of Madison Street, north of Avenue 60, south of Avenue 58 and west of Monroe; and the east side of Monroe Street, between Avenue 59 and Avenue 61; and more particularly described as follows: APNs 764-180-001, -002, -003, -004, -005, -006, 764-190-01 1, -002, -003, -004, -005, -006, 764-200-001, -002, -003, -004, -005, -006, -007, 764-210-001, -002, -003, -004, -005, -006, 764-240-002, -003, -004, -005, 764-290-001 and -002 WHEREAS, said Addendum has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has determined that although the proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-080, Zone Change 2001-103 could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because appropriate mitigation measures were made a part of the addendum and included in the Conditions of Approval; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify certifying said Addendum: 61. 005 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TDDesEA232Add.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- TD Desert Development Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #232 Adopted: February 5, 2002 1 . The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-080, Zone Change 2001-103 will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by the Addendum. 2. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-080, Zone Change 2001-103 will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 4. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-080, Zone Change 2001-103 do not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Addendum. 5. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-080, Zone Change 2001-103 will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. 6. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-080, Zone Change 2001-103 will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 8. The Planning Commission has considered the Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #232 and the Addendum reflects the independent judgement of the City. 9. The City has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 6� 00u G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TDDesEA232Add.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- TD Desert Development Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #232 Adopted: February 5, 2002 10. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitutes the findings of the City Council for this Addendum. 2. That it does hereby certify the Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #232 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Addendum text on file in the Community Development Department. 3. That the Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #232 reflects the independent judgement of the City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 5th day of February 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PEIVA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 61 <<. 607 GAWPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TDDesEA232Add.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- TD Desert Development Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #232 Adopted: February 5, 2002 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 615 003 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TDDesEA232Add.wpd ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT #232 (SCHEDULE #9164450613) (CEQA GUIDELINE 15164) FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2001-080 AND ZONE CHANGE 2001-103 FOR PRE -ANNEXATION APPLICATION FOR A PORTION OF THE CORAL MOUNTAIN SPECIFIC PLAN, NO. 218, AMENDMENT NO. 1 TD DESERT DEVELOPMENT G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\TDDesEIRAdd.WPD [� 009 The City of La Quinta, as lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code section 21000, et seq. ("CEQA") has prepared this Addendum pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15164. This is an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #232 ("EIR") that the County of Riverside certified in 1999 for the Coral Mountain Specific Plan, SP 218, Amendment #1. The purpose of this Addendum is to document the annexation of the project to the City of La Quinta, which will be implemented through the following land use approvals: General Plan Amendment 2001-80 and Zone Change 2001-103 These are collectively referred to as "the Revised Project." All mitigation measures included in EIR 232 and AEIR 232 are incorporated into this document by this reference. It is assumed for purposes of this analysis, that all the mitigation measures required within Riverside County's jurisdiction would also be required by the City. The Revised Project consists of 396 acres of the total 1,280 acres included in the Coral Mountain Specific Plan SP/EIR 218, Amendment #1. The Revised Project will result in the annexation of the eastern portion of the Specific Plan area into the City of La Quinta. The City has determined that the proposed residential development will be consistent with the density and character of the adjacent residential development, and will be consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City's General Plan and Specific Plan 218, Amendment #1, as approved by the County in 1999. The Revised Project does not propose any change to the land uses proposed in Specific Plan 218, Amendment #1. Only annexation of the site, and associated pre - annexation land use and zoning designations, are being considered at this time. The Specific Plan allows 9 holes of golf, a driving range, a clubhouse, up to 1,066 residential units on 248 acres, and 14 acres of commercial land. The approvals requested as part of the annexation request are: 1) General Plan Amendment to change the designation on 173.5 acres currently designated Medium Density Residential under the Specific Plan to Low Density Residential, 74.9 acres of Medium -High Density Residential in the Specific Plan to Medium Density Residential, Golf Course on land designated Open Space in the Specific Plan (133.3 acres), and 14.2 acres of Commercial designated land under the Specific Plan to Community Commercial, of which 10 acres will be designated Community Commercial, and 4.2 acres Neighborhood Commercial; 2) Zone Change to change the designation on 173.5 acres currently designated Medium Density Residential under the Specific Plan to Low Density Residential, 74.9 acres of Medium -High Density Residential in the Specific Plan to Medium Density Residential , Golf Course on land designated Open Space in the Specific Plan (133.3 acres, and 14.2 acres of Commercial designated land under the 611 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\TDDesEIRAdd.WPD 010 Specific Plan to Community Commercial, of which 10 acres will be designated Community Commercial, and 4.2 acres Neighborhood Commercial pursuant to the Land Use Plan in Specific Plan 218, Amendment #1 . The City has compared the impacts of the Revised Project with those impacts analyzed in the EIR and finds as follows: Aesthetics - Impacts no Hazards and Hazardous Public Services - Impacts greater than those Materials - Impacts no no greater than those previously analyzed. greater than those previously analyzed. The Annexation of the previously analyzed. The annexation of the property proposed land will not annexation action will will be served by Riverside result in any change in have no impact on County Sheriff and Fire the buildout of the hazardous materials; the Department staff, under the property. The residential residents of the proposed City's service contracts. units, golf clubhouse and project will participate in The contract costs may potential commercial the City's household increase for the City, but development are hazardous waste disposal these costs will be offset by consistent with those .programs; commercial revenues generated by currently permitted and operations will be property tax and sales tax constructed under the overseen by City and at the site and from the City's General Plan. The County agencies with residents. School fees will proposed height, mass jurisdiction over be paid regardless of which and architectural style of hazardous waste. jurisdiction is responsible for buildings within the construction of the project. annexation area is of Parks will be constructed substantially the same within the Specific Plan, character as those and golf course lands will existing in the City and surround the homes. encouraged in the General Plan. 610 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\TDDesEIRAdd.WPD (i 1 1- Agriculture Resources - Impacts no greater than previously analyzed. The development of the approved Specific Plan will result in a loss of lands designated as Prime Farmland in the County General Plan. The annexation of the property will not change the previously analyzed impacts to agriculture. Air Quality - Impacts identical to those previously analyzed. The annexation action will not have any impact on the air quality of the area. The project will remain the same as was analyzed in the EI R, with identical mitigation measures required. Hydrology and Water Quality - Impacts no greater than previously analyzed. The City requires the implementation of both NPDES standards and 100 year storm retention in proposed project construction. Such standards will be imposed for the proposed project, when construction occurs after annexation. These measures are designed to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Land Use Planning - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The construction of the project under the City's jurisdiction is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the City General Plan and the Specific Plan, as amended, and continues the development pattern established in the General Plan. The annexation represents a logical extension of urbanization for the City. Recreation - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. Annexation of the project will not affect the parks and golf course planned for ultimate buildout of the proposed project. These facilities will be provided on - site, and will offset the need for such facilities created by future development. Transportation/Traffic - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The annexation of this portion of the Specific Plan will not have an impact on traffic generation. The ultimate construction of the project will result in identical impacts to those described in the EIR, for which mitigation measures have been included. �1J G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\TDDesEIRAdd.WPD ,, 012 Biological Resources - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The annexation action will have no direct impact on biological resources. Additional surveys are required in EIR 232 to ensure that no sensitive species occur on the site, or that impacts are mitigated if they do occur. These surveys will also be required by the City. Cultural Resources - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. Annexation of the project site will have no impact on cultural resources. The buildout of the proposed project was analyzed in the EIR, and mitigation measures included. These will be implemented by the City. Geology and Soils - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The impacts of development of the proposed project were analysed in the EIR, and will not change from that analysis. Mitigation measures included in the EIR will be implemented by the City through the development process. Mineral Resources - Not applicable. Noise - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The annexation action will not impact the noise environment at the project site. The buildout of the project, as analyzed in the EIR, included mitigation measures which will be implemented by the City. Utilities and Service Systems - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. Annexation will have no impact on utilities and service systems. The buildout of the proposed project was analyzed in the EIR for the proposed project, and mitigation measures included. These will be implemented by the City. Population and Housing - Impacts identical to those previously analyzed. The annexation action will have no impact on population and housing. The number of units proposed under the County's approved Specific Plan will be the same under the City's jurisdiction. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\TDDesEIRAdd.WPD 013 The City finds that consideration of the Revised Project does not call for the preparation of a subsequent EIR pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15162 or Public Resources Code Section 21166, in that the Revised Project does not involve: 1) substantial changes to the project analyzed in the EIR which would involve new significant effects on the environment or substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which would involve new significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the EIR; or 3) new information of substantial importance which would involve new significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the EIR substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\TDDesEIRAdd.WPD 014 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-431 PREPARED FOR A PORTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-080, ZONE CHANGE 2001-103 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-431 APPLICANT: T D DESERT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 5th day of February 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2001-431 for General Plan Amendment 2001-080, Zone Change 2001-103 for pre -annexation designation of lands bounded by Avenue 58, Madison Street, Avenue 60 and extending approximately one half mile east of Monroe Street; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 22nd day of January 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2001-431 for General Plan Amendment 2001-080, Zone Change 2001-103 for pre -annexation designation of lands bounded by Avenue 58, Madison Street, Avenue 60 and extending approximately one half mile east of Monroe Street, more particularly described as follows: APNs 761-210-002 through -007, 761-2001, -003, -005 -006 and -007, 761-180-001 through -006, 761-190-002 through -007, 761-330-003, -004, -005 and -013 WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study (EA 2001-431) and has determined that although the proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-080, Zone Change 2001-103 could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because appropriate mitigation measures were made a part of the assessment and included in the conditions of approval and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify certifying said Environmenta Assessment: w �- 015 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TDDesEA.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-431 TD Desert Development Adopted: February 5, 2002 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-080, Zone Change 2001-103 will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2001-431. 2. The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 4. The proposed project do not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. 5. The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. 6. The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 8. The Planning Commission has considered the Environmental Assessment 2001- 431 and the Environmental Assessment reflects the independent judgement of the City. 9. The City has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). Ol0 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TDDesEA.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-431 TD Desert Development Adopted: February 5, 2002 10. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitutes the findings of the City Council for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby certifying Environmental Assessment 2001-431 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum on file in the Community Development Department. 3. That Environmental Assessment 2001-431 reflects the independent judgement of the City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 5th day of February 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 4 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TDDesEA.wpd 017 City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-431 TD Desert Development Adopted: February 5, 2002 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 013 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TDDesEA.wpd Addendum for Environmental Assessment 2001-431 I. d) The proposed annexation will not result in an increase in light or glare in and of itself. Buildout of the.420 acres, however, will generate light, since the buildout of the area could generate up to 1,680 dwelling units. The land use designation to be placed on the parcel will result in low density residential units, which generate low levels of light. The project will be required to meet the City's standards for outdoor lighting, which will ensure that lighting is directed downward and contained within the site. These standards will mitigate the potential impacts of light and glare to a less than significant level. II. c). The loss of land in this location will likely be made up on lands being farmed in the future to the east of this area. The loss of 360 acres of agricultural land in an area where over 331,000 acres are in cultivation, is not expected to be significant. III . c) The Coachella Valley is a non -attainment area for PM 10 (particulate matter of 10 microns or smaller). The buildout of the annexation area has the potential to generate dust, which could contribute to the PM 10 problem in the area. In order to control PM 10, the City has imposed standards and requirements on development to control dust. Applicants for future projects will be required to submit such a plan prior to initiation of any earth moving activity at the site. In addition, the potential impacts associated with PM 10 can be mitigated by the measures below. 1. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. 2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation. 3. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. Cut and fill quantities will be balanced on site. 5. Any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. 6. Watering of any site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on -going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on any site within the annexation area. Portions of a site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. -, 013 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Cora1MtAdd431.WPD 7. All disturbed areas shall be treated to prevent erosion until any site within the annexation area is constructed upon. Pad sites which are to remain undeveloped shall be seeded with either a desert wildflower mix or grass seed, or chemical stabilizer. 8. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. 9. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean up of construction -related dirt on approach routes to the site. 10. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, the impacts of PM 10 on the annexation area will not be significant. III. d) The primary source of air pollution in the City is the automobile. Annexation will not increase air emissions, but the buildout of the project will. The proposed land use designation for the subject properties is Low Density Residential, 0. Based on this daily trip generation, the potential impacts associated with vehicle traffic generated from the properties can be calculated. Running Exhaust Emissions (pounds/day) PM 10 PM 10 PM 10 CO ROC NOx Exhaust Brakes Tires 50 mph 489 19 100 -- 2 2 Daily Threshold* 550 75 100 150 Based on 13,517 trips/day and average trip length of 7 miles, using EMFAC7G Model provided by California Air Resources Board. Assumes catalytic light autos at 75yF. * Operational thresholds provided by SCAQMD for assistance in determining the significance of a project and the need for an EIR. As demonstrated in the Table above, the proposed project will not exceed any threshold for the generation of moving emissions, as established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District in determining the need for an EIR. The impacts to air quality relating to chemical pollution are not expected to be significant. IV. a) Annexation of the parcels will not have a significant impact on biological resources. A number of the parcels are or have been in agriculture, and therefore disturbed. Prior to development on the parcels, City staff will review the area's potential as habitat for sensitive species, as part of individual projects' 0 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Cora1MtAdd431.WPD 2 approvals. Should the parcels be identified as being likely habitat for a sensitive or listed species, the City's General Plan requires that biological resource analysis be performed. The resulting reports, if any, will include mitigation measures for any identified species. V. b) Annexation of the project site will not, in of itself, have an impact on cultural resources. Buildout of the site, however, could impact such resources. Prior to development on the parcels, City staff will review the area's potential for cultural resources, as part of individual project approvals. Should on -site surveys be necessary, the City's General Plan requires that cultural resource analysis be performed. The resulting reports, I any, will include mitigation measures for any identified resource. VI. a) i), ii), iii) In order to protect the City from hazards associated with groundshaking and liquefaction, the City has adopted the Uniform Building Code, and the associated construction requirements for seismic zones. The City Engineer will require the preparation of site -specific geotechnical analysis in conjunction with the submittal of grading plans for specific projects. This requirement will ensure that impacts from ground failure or liquefaction are reduced to a less than significant level. VI. c) The soils for this area will be examined through an on -site soil analysis required by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits for individual projects. These requirements will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. VIII. b) Domestic water is provided by the Coachella Valley Water District, which extracts groundwater from a number of wells in the Lower Thermal sub -basin. At the time the properties are developed, individual projects will be required to retain storm flows on -site, which will encourage percolation of storm water into the ground. Developers or land owners will also be required to implement the City's standards for water conserving plumbing fixtures. Finally, all future projects will be required to meet the requirements of the City's water -conserving landscaping ordinance, which requires that projects demonstrate that landscaping plans are water -efficient. These existing City standards will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. IX. b) The County of Riverside currently has jurisdiction over the annexation area. The land use designation for the subject property under the County General Plan is Agriculture. The City proposes a Low Density Residential designation for the properties. The lands to the north and west are approved for the Coral Mountain Specific Plan, which includes low and medium density residential development, 20 0 21' G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Cora1MtAdd431.WPD 3 commercial and golf course facilities. Lands to the north are already developing for golf course and low density residential land uses. The annexation and ultimate development of the properties represents a logical extension of the City's urban boundary. The impacts to land use are not expected to be significant. XI. a) The noise environment in the annexation area is generally quiet, due to limited development and low traffic volumes. The ultimate development of the annexation area will result in an increase in noise levels, particularly noise generated by automobiles. The proposed land use designation will result in residential land uses on the properties, which are considered sensitive receptors. The City requires the preparation of noise analysis when projects are proposed adjacent to major roadways. At the time that individual projects are proposed, the City will review the potential noise impacts associated with the properties, and require analysis if it is necessary. The reports resulting from this analysis will include mitigation measures if required. XIII. a) Both annexation and construction and ultimate buildout of the annexation area will result in potential impacts for police and fire services, and schools. The property, once developed, will generate property tax. These taxes will contribute to the City's General Fund, and offset the potential impact to police and fire service. XV. b) The individual projects to be developed in the future will be required to pay the mandated school fees in effect at the time development occurs. The ultimate development of the annexation area is not expected to have a significant impact on municipal services or facilities. An additional 60 acres is being studied under this Environmental Assessment (EA). It is estimated that the total area being studied under this EA could generate up to 13,517 daily trips. The traffic analysis has found that although a number of traffic improvements will be required as buildout of the annexation area occurs, the level of service standards adopted by the City will be maintained. In order to assure that circulation generated by buildout of the annexation area is adequately mitigated, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1. All development proposals within the annexation area shall either conform to the roadway improvements recommended in "Coral Mountain at La Quinta Specific Plan 218 Amendment 1 Option Property Annexation Traffic Impact Study," prepared by Endo Engineering, November 2001; or 6 �l 3 ♦ r 022 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Cora1MtAdd431.WPD 4 2. Shall prepare an independent traffic analysis which incorporates cumulative development into the analysis, for review and approval by the City Engineer. XVI. b)- f) Although the annexation will have no impact on utilities, the ultimate buildout of the site will have an impact on utilities and public services. However, the overall impacts of the project on these services is not expected to be significant, insofar as these suppliers will charge the residents for their services, and provide improvements to these services as needed. In addition, connection fees will be required of the project proponent at construction of the project. These fees and charges will mitigate the potential impacts to a less than significant level. 023 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Cora1MtAdd431.WPD 5 Environmental Checklist Form Environmental Assessment 2001-431 1 . Project Title: General Plan Amendment 2001-080, Zone Change 2001-103, Pre - Annexation land use designation and zoning 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Jerry Herman, 760-777-7125 4. Project Location: South side of Avenue 58 a distance of 1 /4 mile a distance of 1 /2 mile, west side of Monroe Street between Avenue 58 and Avenue 60, westerly a distance of 1 /2 mile, and the northeast corner of Madison Street and Avenue 60. 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 6. General Plan Designation: Proposed: Low Density Residential 7. Zoning: Proposed: Low Density Residential 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to assign land use and zoning designations for an annexation application to the City of La Quinta. The proposed designation is Low Density Residential. The land is currently designated Agriculture in the County General Plan. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings. North: Golf course, vacant desert lands designated for Low Density Residential development South: Vacant desert lands West: Approved Coral Mountain Specific Plan East: Vacant desert lands, agriculture, approved Coral Mountain Specific Plan 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Local Agency Formation Commission 63� G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CoraIMtCklst.WPD 024 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology and Soils Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared W I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 0 I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Christine di lorio Printed Name Date r. -I City of La Quinta 6 `= For _ 02J G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Cora1MtCk1st.WPD 2 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1 . A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analysis are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. The analysis of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Cora1MtCk1st.WPD 3 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: I. AESTHETICS: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (General Plan Exhibit CIR-5) b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (General Plan EIR, page 5-12 ff.) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials) AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES:. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Dept. Of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29, 5-32) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (Aerial photographs) AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact MEMOmmmm u R. X *4 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CoralMtCklst.WPD 4 027 d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Project Description) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Project Description) IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment, Exhibit 5-1) b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) c) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) Either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (La Quinta Municipal Code; General Plan) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-5) V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-77 ff.) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resources (i.e., an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-77 ff.) X X X X X X X X 23 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Cora1MtCk1st.WPD 5 W VII. c) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? (Lakebed Delineation Map) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-77 ff.) GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.2-3, page 4-35) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (General Plan EIR, page 4- 30 ff.) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) iv) Landslides? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) c) Be located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-32) HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Application Materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Application Materials) c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Application Materials) MMME MMME1 MMME mm�m M�M= ==ME MEMO X X X 61-1 3k, 023 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Cora1MtCk1st.WPD d) Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Riverside County Hazardous Materials Listing) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip; would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 6-1 1) h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildlands fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY : Would the project: a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-26, 6-27) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (General Plan EIR, page 4-57 ff.) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR, page 4- 30 ff.) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on - or off -site? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems to control? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) f) Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-13) g) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-13) MEMO MEMO EMEN G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Cora1MtCk1st.WPD 7 030 IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Specific Plan Project Description) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purposes of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Master Environmental Assessment 2-1 1) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assess. 5-5) X. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29) XI. NOISE: Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (General Plan EIR, page 4-157 ff.) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (General Plan EIR, page 4-157 ff.) c) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan EIR, page 4-157 ff.) d) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Master Environmental Assessment) e) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive levels? (General Plan map) X rA Ll X M X X X X Q XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and X businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) ? (General Plan, page 2-14)j 031. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Cora1MtCk1st.WPD b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff. ) Police protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff. ) Schools? (General Plan MEA, page 4-9 ff. ) Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA, page 4-14 ff. ) XIV. RECREATION: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application Materials) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application Materials) XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff. And "Coral Mountain at La Quinta Specific Plan 218 Amendment 1 Option Property Annexation Traffic Impact Study," prepared by Endo Engineering, November 2001) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff. And "Coral Mountain at La Quinta Specific Plan 218 Amendment 1 Option Property Annexation Traffic Impact Study," prepared by Endo Engineering, November 2001) X KI U In X X r " , J G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CoralMtCklst.WPD 032 c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff.) d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff.) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Application Materials) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Application Materials) g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Application Materials) XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24 ) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24 ) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, page 4-27) d) Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, page 4- 20) e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, page 4-20) f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (General Plan MEA, page 4-28) XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? *4 0 X X X X X X X G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Cora1MtCk1st.WPD 10 033 b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSIS. X 9 F:l Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. None b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. None SOURCES: Master Environmental Assessment, City of La Quinta General Plan 1992 General Plan, City of La Quinta, 1992 SCAQMD CEQA Handbook Paleontological Lakebed Delineation Map, City of La Quinta City of La Quinta Municipal Code "Coral Mountain at La Quinta Specific Plan 218 Amendment 1 Option Property Annexation Traffic Impact Study," prepared by Endo Engineering, November 2001 034 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\Cora1MtCk1st.WPD 11 N p °Cd 0 U O to 00 O 0 ': y M O o � � ON � M U 4-+ ° > 110 O �,c O n U 0 00cn Novo"� o a o o �� ' 0 C) �, 3 oa'> °U a O V1 Q� �V • z ap z a a O ' O 0 O M N � 0 N U bUA � Cd �00 o Q ►`� U O N E-o t O z � � z � � V a E-� A W y+ �A a� W ox VV CU Cd d cd U O U U � Q Qa� on � � � o GJ O O �O U O O O •U c .� U •� U •� U U v 0 .En � U � CQ O O o a a as a a.a coa a oz Qn C,3 Cd •bD U U U GA U Q GA 'b 4 O +j c rA O N N o aW a cl Cd 0 V) V1 a U cd Cd b O N 3 > fl. -d cz 0-0 as a a En cn '3 0 64 0 0- 03 E-+ A U� WA x a W ox UV Eli b a V > o 0.4 C7 0-0 '> x x U U N � •O �O O wz z as �O a i a� a� a w w U U a� Z o a •� a cn U ° � ��z �. W Hx a °�o�� a co os a W Cd f0* ° � E E+ W V1 "� � O ° N .. �C U V Q, a N w c w fj�}J o 03U RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ASSIGNING PRE -ANNEXATION LAND USE DESIGNATIONS TO 816 ACRES GENERALLY BOUNDED BY AVENUE 58 ON THE NORTH, AVENUE 60 ON THE SOUTH, MADISON STREET ON THE WEST AND MONROE STREET ON THE EAST; AND ON THE EAST SIDE OF MONROE STREET, BETWEEN AVENUE 59 (EXTENDED) AND AVENUE 61 CASE NO.: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-080 APPLICANT: T D DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5th day of February 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to review a General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan designation on 816 acres generally located between Avenues 58 and 60, Madison and Monroe Streets, and east of Monroe Street, between Avenue 59 and Avenue 62; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 22nd day of January 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to review a General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan designation on 816 acres generally located between Avenues 58 and 60, Madison and Monroe Streets, and east of Monroe Street, between Avenue 59 and Avenue 62; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings approving said General Plan Amendment: 1. Internal General Plan Consistency. The proposed amendment to the Land Use Map would change 173.5 acres of currently designated Medium Density Residential land to Low Density Residential; 74.9 acres of Medium -High Density Residential to Medium Density Residential; 133.3 acres of Open Space to Golf Course; 10 acres of Commercial to Community Commercial; 4.2 acres of Commercial to Neighborhood Commercial; and 420 acres of Agriculture to Low Density Residential. This represents a logical extension of the land use pattern in the City, and is supported by General Plan goals and policies regarding providing a full range of services and opportunities for City residents. 2. Public Welfare. The proposed amendment will not negatively impact public safety, insofar as the land use change is a logical extension of the land use pattern in the City. 0 3 '7 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TDDesGPA.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- General Plan Amendment 2001-080 TD Desert Development Adopted: February 5, 2002 3. General Plan Compatibility. The proposed General Plan amendment will be compatible with the General Plan, insofar as all the proposed land use designations exist in the City and this change represents a furtherance of General Plan goals. 4. Property Suitability. The property is generally flat, surrounded by major roadways, and suitable for development. 5. Change in Circumstances. The continued development of the City requires the continued modification of the Land Use Map, and this amendment continues to support that development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby confirm the conclusion that Environmental Assessment 2001-431 and the Addendum to EIR No. 232 assessed the environmental concerns of the General Plan Amendment; and, 3. That it does approve General Plan Amendment 2001-080 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as contained in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 5th day of February 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 64.' 033 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TDDesGPA.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- General Plan Amendment 2001-080 TD Desert Development Adopted: February 5, 2002 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 033 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\TDDesGPA.wpd PROP. GENERAL PLAN (City of La Quinta sec. 26, 27, 35 TOSR7E Buk 761 - 200. 210. 330, W armors zou Sup. DIST CITY OF LA QUINTA Dist. ° s 5530 Drawn 11 /20/01 By: LPG ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA ASSIGNING PRE -ANNEXATION ZONING TO 816 ACRES GENERALLY BOUNDED BY AVENUE 58 ON THE NORTH, AVENUE 60 ON THE SOUTH, MADISON STREET ON THE WEST AND MONROE STREET ON THE EAST; AND THE EAST SIDE OF MONROE STREET, BETWEEN AVENUE 59 AND AVENUE 61 CASE NO.: ZONE CHANGE 2001-103 T D DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5th day of February, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for TD Development for review of a Zone Change to allow 173.5 acres currently designated Medium Density Residential under Specific Plan 218 to Low Density Residential, 74.9 acres of Medium -High Density Residential to Medium Density Residential, Golf Course on 133.3 acres designated Open Space in the Specific Plan, 14.2 acres of Commercial designated land under the Specific Plan to 10 acres of Community Commercial, and 4.2 acres of Neighborhood Commercial, and 420 acres currently designated Agriculture under the County General Plan to Low Density Residential; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings recommending approval of said Zone Change: 1 . The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan, and the Land Use Map for the General Plan and surrounding development and land use designations, ensuring land use compatibility. 2. The Zone Change will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, as it has been designed to be compatible with surrounding development, and conform with the City's standards and requirements. 3. The Zone Change is compatible with the City's Zoning Ordinance in that it supports the development of single family residential homes, golf course and commercial projects within a planned community. 4. The Zone Change supports the orderly development of the City. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California that it does ordain as follows: '~ G:\WPDOCS\Ordinances\TDDes.WPD U 4 Ordinance No. Zone Change 2001-103 - TD Desert Development February 5, 2002 SECTION 1. PURPOSE. To rezone a portion of land generally bounded by Avenue 58 on the north, Avenue 60 on the south, Madison Street on the west and Monroe Street on the east; and the east side of Monroe Street, between Avenue 59 and Avenue 61, known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 764-180-001, -002, -003, -0041 -005, -006, 764-190-01 1, -002, -003, -004, -005, -006, 764-200-001, -002, -003, -004, -005, -006, -007, 764-210-001, -002, -003, -004, -005, -006, 764-240-0021 -003, -004, -005, 764-290-001 and -002 as follows: 173.5 acres currently designated Medium Density Residential under Specific Plan 218 to Low Density Residential, 74.9 acres of Medium -High Density Residential to Medium Density Residential, Golf Course on 133.3 acres designated Open Space in the Specific Plan, 14.2 acres of Commercial designated land under the Specific Plan to 10 acres of Community Commercial, and 4.2 acres of Neighborhood Commercial, and 420 acres currently designated Agriculture under the County General Plan to Low Density Residential, and as contained in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of. SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL. This Zone Change has complied with the requirements of the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended) and adopted by City Council Resolution 83-68, in that the Community Development Director has determined that the proposed Zone Change will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4: POSTING. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three public places designated by Resolution of the City Council, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on this 5th day of February, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 643 GAWPDOCS\Ordinances\TDDes.WPD 042 42 Ordinance No. Zone Change 2001-103 - TD Desert Development February 5, 2002 N JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California GAWPDOCS\Ordinances\TDDes.WPD 043 ATTACHMENT #1 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Environmental Assessment 2001-431 , Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 232, General Plan Amendment 2001-080, Zone Change 2001-103; a request of T. D. Development for 1) Certification of an Addendum to Riverside County Environmental Assessment No. 232; 2) Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for the area bounded by Avenue 58, Monroe Street, Avenue 60 and Madison Street, outside of Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment #1; 3) Change the land use designation from: A. Medium Residential, Medium High Residential, and Golf Course, Community Facilities and Commercial as shown in Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment #1 to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Major Community Facilities, Neighborhood and Community Commercial; B) From Agriculture to Low Density Residential for the area bounded by Avenue 58, Monroe Street, Avenue 60 and Madison Street, outside of Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment #1; 4) Change the zoning from: A) Riverside County designation Specific Plan as shown in Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment #1 to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Golf Course, Major Community Facilities, Neighborhood and Community Commercial; B. From Agriculture to Low Density Residential and Golf Course Bounded by Avenue 58, Monroe Street, Avenue 60 and Madison Street, outside of Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment #1, for the property bounded by Avenue 58, Monroe Street, Avenue 60, and Madison Street. Also, a portion of the area east of Monroe Street between Avenue 69 and Avenue 61. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Kirk asked staff if the figure referred to in Addendum Item II.c) came from. Staff stated the figure was provided by Riverside County for the Eastern Coachella Valley. Commissioner Robbins stated that figure would have to apply to the entire Riverside County. Staff would research the figure and correct the figure if necessary. 3. Commissioner Tyler asked if there was a Williamson Act contract in this area. Staff noted where one existed within the area. �. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-22-02.wpd 2 04� Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 4. Commissioner Robbins asked how a zone change in and of itself can have any environmental impact. Staff stated the zone change does not, but the buildout out the project under the zoning designation does and that is what is evaluated in the Environmental Assessment. Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez stated it is a discretionary project and the Environmental Assessment looks at the uses that will result from the zone change. 5. Commissioner Kirk stated the Zone Change does not increase the intensity it is a conversion of the County designations to City designation. Staff stated not within the lands outside the Specific Plan area. There is an intensification of land use there, as they are currently agricultural. 6. Commissioner Tyler asked why the City was not be listed as one of the applicants. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated it should be and it would be corrected before going to the City Council. 7. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. John Gamlin, representing the applicant, gave a presentation on the project and stated they had no objections to the conditions as written. 8. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of the applicant. There being none, Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment on this item. 9. There being no further public participation, the public comment portion of the public hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 10. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-013, recommending Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-431, subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-22-02.wpd 3 047 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 11. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-014, recommending Certification of an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #232, subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 12. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-015, recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 2001-080, subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 13. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-016, recommending approval of Zone Change 2001-103, subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. B. vir nmental Assessment 2001-436 General Plan Amendment 2001 - 040. and Zone Change 2001-105 and Specific Plan 2001-055 - "The Gat wa "; a request of the City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency for revie of a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from High Densit Residential to Medium Density Residential and Tourist Commer ial and review of development standards and design guidelines for Touris Commercial uses including hotels, and retail -related uses, and residential evelopment including townhouses and single family residences f the property located at the southeast corner of Miles Avenue and W shington Street. 1 . Chairman A Is opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Mr. Frank Spevacek, Rosenow Spevacek Group, Redevelopment nsultant for the City, presented the information contained in the s ff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Develop ent Department. r- 043 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-22-02.wpd 4 Carol Ann Scanlon 4140 Warner Boulevard 9 114 Burbank, Ca. 91505 January 30, 2002 City of La Quinta Planning Commission 78-495 Calle Tampico LaQuinta, Ca. 92274 .pear City of LaQuinta Planning Commission: 0f.60e. rK -V �N3Wd0 , o 70 pp� Re: 81-891 Avenue 58 LaQuinta, Ca. 92274 I am in receipt of the notifications of public hearings concerning the environmental assessment 2001-431, General Plan Amendment 2001-080, Zone Change 2001-103 otherwise known at the TD Desert Development. I have no opposition to this plan, as long as 1 am considered "grand fathered " and am able to maintain my 4.8 acres as equestrian property and am able to maintain my horses per the zoning at the time of purchase of this property. I have spoken with Jerry Herman of the Planning Division and he has reassured me that my property will remain as horse property. I do wish to request, at this time, that the city installs "Horse Crossing" signs on 58`h street, specifically at the corner of 58`h and Madison, since that is a ai�icult intersection to cross on horse back. At this time it is only a two-way stop street. Thanking you in advance for considering my request for the cautionary signs for the horsemen in our area, I remain, Cordially -yours; Carol Ann Scanlon 6�J COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 5, 2002 A Joint Public Hearing Between the City Council and Redevelopment Agency to Approve an Agreement to Sell Real Property Located at 52-645 Avenida Diaz by and Between Katherine Carroll and the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: 9 Approve the sale of 52-645 Avenida Diaz to maintain an affordable housing unit in Project Area No. 1 for a purchase price of $1 10,000. - . FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The Agreement would result in the following fiscal impacts: Resale Proceeds. The Agency will receive approximately $57,200 in cash proceeds from this transaction generated by the new mortgage loan and down payment less closing costs. The Agency's remaining $46,700 financial investment will be converted into a silent second trust deed in favor of the Agency. Property Rehabilitation Costs. funded by rent revenue. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: None. All property rehabilitation costs have been In August 1995, the Agency acquired 50 single family homes as a result of the bankruptcy of Coachella Valley Land to protect the Agency's investment in the homes, to prevent a pending foreclosure action, and to maintain the units as very low income rental units. The Agency cost to acquire the 50 housing units averaged $86,500 per unit. On February 17, 1998, the Agency authorized the sale of up to two (2) units per year and directed staff to sell the units first to qualified existing tenants, and second to other eligible very low income households. Because many of the tenants are now G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\52-645DiazCCstfrpt.wpd receiving work training as a requirement of their state and county assistance, their economic situation is improving. The proposed sale is the fifth unit to be sold to an existing tenant. Property Resale. The sale transaction would be structured as other Agency affordable housing projects, wherein the existing Agency -funded silent second trust deed would cover the difference between the market sales price and an affordable first trust deed mortgage. The proposed purchaser now qualifies in the low income category. If this sale is authorized, the unit will be sold for the market value of $1 10,000, with the buyer funding a 3% down payment and a private lender originating a $60,000 first trust deed mortgage (the maximum loan the homebuyer can obtain). The Agency would convert $46,700 of its equity in the property into a silent second trust deed loan. Prior to the sale, this unit will have been substantially rehabilitated and therefore, can be counted toward the Agency's inclusionary housing requirement. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: Alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve the sale of 52-645 Avenida Diaz to maintain an affordable housing unit in Project Area No. 1 for a purchase price of $1 10,000; or 2. Deny the request to sell this property and maintain it as a very low income rental unit; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Herman,, munity Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Summary Report '� 0 1aquinta\1ghp\renta1 housing\52-645DiazCCstfrpt.wpd A ACHMENT #1 SUMMARY REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SALE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND KATHERINE CARROLL February 5, 2002 INTRODUCTION This document is the Summary Report ("Report") for the proposed sale between the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") and Katherine Carroll ("Buyer"'). The purpose of the Sale Agreement ("Agreement") is to facilitate the sale by the Agency of a single-family dwelling to the Buyer. This Report has been prepared pursuant to Section 33433 of the California Health and Safety Code ("California Community Redevelopment Law") and presents the following: A summary of the proposed transaction. • The cost of the sale to the Agency. • The estimated value of the interest to be conveyed, determined at the highest and best uses permitted by the Agency's Redevelopment Plan. • The estimated value to be conveyed, determined by the use and with the conditions, covenants, and development costs required by the Agreement. • An explanation of why the sale, pursuant to the Agreement, will assist in the elimination of blight. SUBJECT PROPERTY The Subject Property ("Property") is a 3-bedroom, 2-bath single-family dwelling located at 52-645 Avenida Diaz within La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area No. 1. THE TRANSACTIONS PROVIDED FOR BY THE AGREEMENT The Agreement will facilitate the sale of the Property to the Buyer, who will continue to occupy the dwelling. The sales price of $1 10,000, which is fair market value for the property, will be funded through a combination of the Buyer's down payment of $3,300, $60,000 financed through the Buyer's first trust deed mortgage, and $46,700 of the Agency's equity in the Property will be converted into a silent second trust deed loan. This second trust deed will include covenants to insure that the Property will remain affordable to a low income family for a minimum of 30 years. The monies required to fund the Agency's second trust deed were expended in August, 1995, when the Agency purchased this unit in order to secure its investment in the unit through an Affordable Housing Agreement with Coachella Valley Land. A portion of these purchase monies will be repaid to the Agency through the Buyer's down payment and first trust deed mortgage; the remaining funds will stay in place to fund the Agency's second trust deed mortgage and closing cost contribution. The Agency will receive approximately $57,200 from this transaction. G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\52-645 diaz summary report.doc 0 0 It History of Property This Property is currently a part of the Agency Rental Property Purchase Program. In May, 1998, the Agency offered this property to the tenant for purchase and the Buyer subsequently expressed an interest in purchasing the unit. Since that time, the Buyer has been approved by First Pacific Financial for a mortgage up to the amount of $60,000. The Buyer is an existing tenant who now qualifies as a low income household. The Cost of the Sale to the Agency The Agency will have a total of approximately $1 14,000 invested in its ownership of the Property through its cost to purchase the unit and to remedy deferred maintenance items which existed at the time of purchase. The sales contract with the Buyer provides for a purchase price of $1 10,000. Under this proposed transaction, the Agency's investment will be treated as follows: Agency Purchase Price: $ 86,500 Total Cost to Qualify Unit as Substantially Rehabilitated (funded from rent revenue): 27,500 Total Agency Investment: $1 14,000 Buyer Down Payment: 3,300 Buyer First Trust Deed Monies Paid to Agency: 60,000 Agency Affordable Housing Second Trust Deed: 46,700 Total Purchase Price: $1 10,000 Unfunded Agency Investment: $ 4,000 Estimated Value of the Interest to be Conveyed, Determined at the Highest and Best Uses Permitted by the Agency's Redevelopment Plan The Redevelopment Plan for La Quinta Redevelopment Project No. 1 provides that the Property shall be used for low -density residential development. The Agency's consultant commissioned a real property appraisal to determine the current market value of a typical Agency owned rental property. The appraisal, dated April 13, 1999, indicated a fair market value of $85,000. A real property appraisal of a similar unit conducted in May, 2000 indicated a fair market value of $106,000. The subject property was recently appraised in conjunction with this loan at a current market value of $1 10,000. This value coincides with other similarly sized rental units in the Cove. Estimated Value of the Interest to be Conveyed, Determined at the Use With the Conditions, Covenants, and Development Costs Required by the Agreement The Agreement provides that the Property will be sold at the current market value of $1 10,000, which reflects the fair market value. Explanation of Why the Sale of the Property Pursuant to the Agreement will Assist in the Elimination of Blight The Agreement provides for the sale of the Property and the recordation of affordability covenants that will insure its continued affordability to a low income household for 30 years. In conjunction with the sale, the unit will be substantially rehabilitated with long term capital improvements, thereby extending the life of the unit and improving its appearance. Thus, the transaction will insure the continued Q affordability of a substantially rehabilitated single-family dwelling to a low income household. G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\52-645 diaz summary report.doc AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 5, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: A Joint Public Hearing Between the City Council and Redevelopment Agency to Approve an Agreement to PUBLIC HEARING: Sell Real Property Located at 53-540 Avenida Carranza by and Between Tyra Painter and the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency RECOMMENDATION: Approve the sale of 53-540 Avenida Carranza to maintain an affordable housing unit in Project Area No. 1 for a purchase price of $1 10,000. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The Agreement would result in the following fiscal impacts: Resale Proceeds. The Agency will receive approximately $89,750 in cash proceeds from this transaction generated by the new mortgage loan and down payment less closing costs. The Agency's remaining $14,150 financial investment will be converted into a silent second trust deed in favor of the Agency. Property Rehabilitation Costs. funded by rent revenue. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: None. All property rehabilitation costs have been In August 1995, the Agency acquired 50 single family homes as a result of the bankruptcy of Coachella Valley Land to protect the Agency's investment in the homes, to prevent a pending foreclosure action, and to maintain the units as very low income rental units. The Agency cost to acquire the 50 housing units averaged $86,500 per unit. On February 17, 1998, the Agency authorized the sale of up to two (2) units per year and directed staff to sell the units first to qualified existing tenants, and second to other eligible very low income households. Because many of the tenants are now G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\53-540CarranzaCCStfRpt.wpd receiving work training as a requirement of their state and county assistance, their economic situation is improving. The proposed sale is the sixth unit to be sold to an existing tenant. Property Resale. The sale transaction would be structured as other Agency affordable housing projects, wherein the existing Agency -funded silent second trust deed would cover the difference between the market sales price and an affordable first trust deed mortgage. The proposed purchaser now qualifies in the moderate income category. If the sale is authorized, the unit will be sold for the market value of $1 10,000, with the buyer funding a 3% down payment and a private lender originating a $92,550 first trust deed mortgage (the maximum loan the homebuyer can obtain). The Agency would convert $14,150 of its equity in the property into a silent second trust deed loan. Prior to the sale, this unit will have been substantially rehabilitated and therefore, can be counted toward the Agency's inclusionary housing requirement. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: Alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve the sale of 53-540 Avenida Carranza to maintain an affordable housing unit in Project Area No. 1 for a purchase price of $1 10,000; or 2. Deny the request to sell this property and maintain it as a very low income rental unit; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, 'ry H e r)n-cK- mmunity Development Director Approved for submission by: l' Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Summary Report 66� G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\53-540CarranzaCCStfRpt.wpd 00� ATTACHMENT #1 SUMMARY REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SALE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND TYRA PAINTER February 5, 2002 INTRODUCTION This document is the Summary Report ("Report") for the proposed sale between the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") and Tyra Painter ("Buyer"). The purpose of the Sale Agreement ("Agreement") is to facilitate the sale by the Agency of a single- family dwelling to the Buyer. This Report has been prepared pursuant to Section 33433 of the California Health and Safety Code ("California Community Redevelopment Law") and presents the following: • A summary of the proposed transaction. • The cost of the sale to the Agency. • The estimated value of the interest to be conveyed, determined at the highest and best uses permitted by the Agency's Redevelopment Plan. • The estimated value to be conveyed, determined by the use and with the conditions, covenants, and development costs required by the Agreement. • An explanation of why the sale, pursuant to the Agreement, will assist in the elimination of blight. SUBJECT PROPERTY The Subject Property ("Property") is a 3-bedroom, 2-bath single-family dwelling located at 53-540 Avenida Carranza within La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area No. 1. THE TRANSACTIONS PROVIDED FOR BY THE AGREEMENT The Agreement will facilitate the sale of the Property to the Buyer, who will continue to occupy the dwelling. The sales price of $1 10,000, which is fair market value for the property, will be funded through a combination of the Buyer's down payment of $3,300, $92,550 financed through the Buyer's first trust deed mortgage, and $14,150 of the Agency's equity in the Property will be converted into a silent second trust deed loan. This second trust deed will include covenants to insure that the Property will remain affordable to a moderate income family for a minimum of 30 years. The monies required to fund the Agency's second trust deed were expended in August, 1995, when the Agency purchased this unit in order to secure its investment in the unit through an Affordable Housing Agreement with Coachella Valley Land. A portion of these purchase monies will be repaid to the Agency through the Buyer's down payment and first trust deed mortgage; the remaining funds will stay in place to fund the Agency's second trust deed mortgage and closing cost contribution. The Agency will receive approximately $89,750 from this transaction. 6 6 G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\53-540 carranza summary report.doc 004 History of Propert This Property is currently a part of the Agency Rental Property Purchase Program. In May, 1998, the Agency offered this property to the tenant for purchase and the Buyer subsequently expressed an interest in purchasing the unit. Since that time, the Buyer has been approved by First Pacific Financial for a mortgage up to the amount of $92,550. The Buyer is an existing tenant who now qualifies as a moderate income household. The Cost of the Sale to the _AQenc The Agency will have a total of approximately $1 14,000 invested in its ownership of the Property through its cost to purchase the unit and to remedy deferred maintenance items which existed at the time of purchase. The sales contract with the Buyer provides for a purchase price of $1 10,000. Under this proposed transaction, the Agency's investment will be treated as follows: Agency Purchase Price: $ 86,500 Total Cost to Qualify Unit as Substantially Rehabilitated (funded from rent revenue): 27,500 Total Agency Investment: $1 14,000 Buyer Down Payment: $ 3, 300 Buyer First Trust Deed Monies Paid to Agency: 92,550 Agency Affordable Housing Second Trust Deed: 14,150 Total Purchase Price: $1 10,000 Unfunded Agency Investment: $4,000 Estimated Value of the Interest to be Conveyed, Determined at the Highest and Best Uses Permitted by the Agency's Redevelopment Plan The Redevelopment Plan for La Quinta Redevelopment Project No. 1 provides that the Property shall be used for low -density residential development. The Agency's consultant commissioned a real property appraisal to determine the current market value of a typical Agency owned rental property. The appraisal, dated April 13, 1999, indicated a fair market value of $85,000. A real property appraisal of a similar unit conducted in May, 2000 indicated a fair market value of $106,000. The subject property was recently appraised in conjunction with this loan at a current market value of $1 10,000. This value coincides with other similarly sized rental units in the Cove. Estimated Value of the Interest to be Conveyed, Determined at the Use With the Conditions, Covenants, and Development Costs Required by the Agreement The Agreement provides that the Property will be sold at the current market value of $1 10,000, which reflects the fair market value. Explanation of Why the Sale of the Property Pursuant to the Agreement will Assist in the Elimination of Blight The Agreement provides for the sale of the Property and the recordation of affordability covenants that will insure its continued affordability to a moderate income household for 30 years. In conjunction with the sale, the unit will be substantially rehabilitated with long term capital improvements, thereby extending the life of the unit and improving its appearance. Thus, the transaction will insure the continued affordability of a substantially rehabilitated single-family dwelling to a moderate income household. 0 00PW G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\53-540 carranza summary report.doc