Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2002 02 19 CC
Cjl?a 4 4Q" City Council Agendas are available on the City's web page @www.la-quinta.org City Council Agenda CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-495 Calle Tampico - La Quinta, California 92253 Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 19, 2002 - 2 p.m. Beginning Res. No. 2002-21 Ord. No. 367 I. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Council Members: Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena II. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. III. CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a). COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT V. CITY OF LA QUINTA, CASE NUMBER INC 010827. 2. CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, MARK WEISS, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 CONCERNING POTENTIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ACQUISITION AND/OR DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF WASHINGTON STREET NORTH OF AVENUE 48 (APN 643-090-024). PROPERTY OWNER/NEGOTIATOR: SUSAN FRANCIS/LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION. NOTE: Time permitting, the City Council may conduct Closed Session discussions during the dinner recess. Additionally, if the City is considering acquisition of real property, persons identified as negotiating parties do not attend the closed session. RECONVENE AT 3:00 P.M. 00 i City Council Agenda Page 1 February 19, 2002 IV. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE V. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or matters that are not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. Please watch the timing device on the podium. For all Business Session matters or Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak to come forward at the appropriate time. VI. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA VII. PRESENTATIONS 1. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF THE DESERT REGARDING THEIR PLANS FOR A TRANSFER STATION. Vill. WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE 1. CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF RIVERSIDE FORECASTING CENTER. 2. CORRESPONDENCE FROM CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, PALM DESERT CAMPUS. IX. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 5, 2002. X. CONSENT CALENDAR Note: Consent Calendar items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved by one motion unless requested for separate consideration by a member of the City Council or the public. 1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED FEBRUARY 19, 2002. 2. TRANSMITTAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT DATED DECEMBER 31, 2001 3. TRANSMITTAL OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED DECEMBER 31, 2001. 4. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEES FOR CHECKS RETURNED WITHOUT PAYMENT. 5. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR A CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICER TO ATTEND A TRAINING CLASS GIVEN BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS, INC., IN ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, FEBRUARY 21-23, 2002. City Council Agenda Page 2 February 19, 2002 6. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE COMMUNITY SAFETY MANAGER TO ATTEND A CLASS GIVEN BY VICTOR VALLEY COLLEGE, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA, MARCH 3-8, 2002. 7. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE SENIOR ENGINEER TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, PUBLIC WORKS OFFICERS INSTITUTE IN SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, MARCH 6-8, 2002. 8. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS ASSISTANT ENGINEER II TO ATTEND THE FLOOD -PLAIN MANAGEMENT AND DUTIES OF THE LOCAL ADMINISTRATOR SEMINAR SPONSORED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA AND PRESENTED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES IN SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, FEBRUARY 28, 2002. 9. APPROVAL OF THE USE OF FUNDS FROM LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 1 FOR PHASE 1 JEFFERSON STREET PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 2 AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE 33445. 10. ACCEPTANCE OF THE CALLE TAMPICO/AVENIDA BERMUDAS TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 2000-17. 11. APPROVAL OF THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE (PS&E) FOR JEFFERSON STREET MEDIAN ISLAND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 99-05B. 12. ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT NO. 98-19, AREA D, SAGEBRUSH, BOTTLEBRUSH, AND SAGUARO WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2000-01. 13. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO BERG AND ASSOCIATES FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-01, PROJECTS 98-19, AREAS A, B, C, D, AND PROTOTYPICAL STREET. 14. APPROVAL OF AWARD OF CONTRACT TO R. J. BULLARD CONSTRUCTION, INC. TO CONSTRUCT PROJECT NO. 99-05A, BRIDGE BARRIER AND RAILING ENHANCEMENTS AT THE JEFFERSON STREET BRIDGE OVER THE ALL AMERICAN CANAL. 15. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 10, PROJECT NO. 98-19, AREAS A, B, AND PROTOTYPICAL STREET, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-01. 16. APPROVAL OF THE CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS ACKNOWLEDGMENT AREA AND THE PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY APPLICATION FORMS. 17. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A SALES PRICE FOR 20TH ANNIVERSARY GLASSES AND ESTABLISHING A ONE -DAY BUSINESS LICENSE FEE FOR THE ARTS AND CRAFTS SHOW. 18. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING STAFF TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER -TAX COLLECTOR FOR THE PURPOSE OF PURCHASING TAX DEFAULT PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND APPROPRIATION OF UP TO $9,000 FOR THE PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY. 0 () City Council Agenda Page 3 February 19, 2002 XI BUSINESS SESSION 1. CONSIDERATION OF A SHOP AND DINE BUSINESS RETENTION PROGRAM. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 2. CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT OF TWO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO SERVE ON THE CIVIC CENTER ART PURCHASE COMMITTEE. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 3. CONSIDERATION OF PARTICIPATION IN AN AMICUS BRIEF TO THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS IN 99 CENTS ONLY STORE V. LANCASTER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, U.S. DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 00-7572 SVW. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 4. CONSIDERATION OF BANNERS FOR THE VILLAGE. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 5. CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 364, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2001-105 FROM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND TOURIST COMMERCIAL FOR PROPERTY AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MILES AVENUE AND WASHINGTON STREET. A. ADOPT ORDINANCE 364 ON SECOND READING 6. CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 365, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 2001-04, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2001-104 TO CHANGE 14 ACRES AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND AVENUE 52 FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL. 7. CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 366, AN ORDINANCE ASSIGNING PRE -ANNEXATION ZONING TO 816 ACRES GENERALLY BOUNDED BY AVENUE 58 ON THE NORTH, AVENUE 60 ON THE SOUTH, MADISON STREET ON THE WEST, AND MONROE STREET ON THE EAST, AND THE EAST SIDE OF MONROE STREET BETWEEN AVENUE 59 AND AVENUE 61. A. ADOPT ORDINANCE 366 ON SECOND READING XII. STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSSION OF CONCEPTUAL LIBRARY PROGRAMMING ELEMENTS. City Council Agenda Page 4 February 19, 2002 XIII. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS 2. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WORKSHOP/INFORMATION COMMITTEE (PENA) 3. C.V. MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (PERKINS) 4. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (SNIFF) 5. DESERT RESORTS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) XV. XVI. xvll. 6. DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AD HOC COMMITTEE (HENDERSON/ADOLPH) 7. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES COMMITTEE (HENDERSON) 8. MUSEUM EXPANSION COMMITTEE (ADOLPH/SNIFF) 9. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 10. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION 11. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FREE LIBRARY SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE 12. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DESERT LIBRARY ZONE ADVISORY BOARD (HENDERSON) 13. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (PENA) 14. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY/SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP (PENA) 15. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JANUARY 8 AND 22, 2002 16. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 20, 2001 17. ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES OF JANUARY 16, 2002 XIV. DEPARTMENT REPORTS 1. CITY MANAGER A. RESPONSE(S) TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK A. REPORT ON UPCOMING EVENTS 4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIRECTOR MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY, 2002 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY, 2002 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY, 2002 7. FINANCE DIRECTOR 8. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY, 2002 9. POLICE CHIEF MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY, 2002 10. FIRE CHIEF MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS 1. LA QUINTA CIVIC MUSIC CONCERTS - COUNCIL MEMBER ADOLPH. RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak form and limit your comments to three (3) minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. PRESENTATIONS - None City Council Agenda Page 5 February 19, 2002 XVIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak, to come forward at the appropriate time. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING TO CERTIFY A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-433, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-082 TO CHANGE CERTAIN STANDARDS RELATING TO INTERSECTION SPACING IN THE GENERAL PLAN; SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 ESTABLISHING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 120,700 SQUARE FOOT NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-066 TO ALLOW A GASOLINE SERVICE STATION AND CAR WASH AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE; AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 22001-71 1 FOR THE SUPERMARKET, BANK, AND DRUGSTORE BUILDINGS TO BE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AVENUE 52 AND JEFFERSON STREET. APPLICANT: RLF DEVELOPMENT. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) B. READ ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING C. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE ON FIRST READING 2. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING TO CERTIFY A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-418 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-077, ZONE CHANGE 2001-100 TO CHANGE THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION AND ZONING DESIGNATION TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WITHIN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE FOR SUBSEQUENT ANNEXATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 200 ACRES, BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY AVENUE 52, EAST OF MONROE STREET, SOUTH OF AVENUE 53, AND EAST OF THE EXISTING CITY LIMITS. APPLICANT: NRI, LA QUINTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) B. READ ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING C. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE ON FIRST READING The applicant has requested a continuance of this Public Hearing to the meeting of May 19, 2002. 3. PUBLIC HEARING TO CERTIFY AN ADDENDUM TO A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 98-375 AND APPROVE SPECIFIC PLAN 98-034, AMENDMENT#1, AN AMENDMENT OF THE TEXT OF DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN, AND AMENDMENT TO THE SITE PLAN DESIGN ADJACENT TO AVENUE 50 FOR A 100,500 SQUARE FOOT SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND AVENUE 50. APPLICANT: LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) City Council Agenda Page 6 February 19, 2002 4. PUBLIC HEARING ON DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES. A. RESOLUTION ACTION A request to continue this public hearing to the meeting of March 5, 2002 has been submitted by City Staff. RECESS Note: A brief recess will be taken to allow the Redevelopment Agency to reconvene in joint session with the City Council. 5. A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING BY AND BETWEEN THE LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND DC & TC, LLC AND TO CONSIDER THE ISSUANCE OF UP TO $8,000,000 OF MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS THAT FACILITATE DEVELOPMENT OF A 118-UNIT SENIOR APARTMENT COMPLEX AS PART OF THE MIRAFLORES NEIGHBORHOOD LOCATED NORTHWEST OF THE JEFFERSON STREET AND AVENUE 48 INTERSECTION. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) XIX. ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to the regularly scheduled City Council Meeting, commencing with closed session at 2:00 P.M. and open session at 3:00 p.m., Tuesday, March 5, 2002, in the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. City Council Agenda Page 7 February 19, 2002 DECLARATION OF POSTING I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting of Tuesday, February 19, 2002, was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico and on the bulletin board at the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce and at Stater Bros. 78-630 Highway 1 1 1, on Friday, February 15, 2002. DATED: February 15, 2002 X�. JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California PUBLIC NOTICES The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at 777-7025, 24-hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 777-7025. A one (1) week notice is required. If background material is to be presented to the City Council, during a City Council Meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the 3:00 p.m session or the 7:00 p.m session for distribution. 0o City Council Agenda Page 8 February 19, 2002 WASTE NIGMT DESRT 'ADM PRESENTATION: WASTE MANAGEMENT 41-575 Eclectic Strecc Palm Desert, CA 92260 (760) 340,5901 (760) 340-2732 Fax www wmdesert.corn February 5, 2002 Mr. Jerry Herman community Service Director City of La Quinta 78-495 Caile Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mr. Ferman: On Friday. February 1, 2002, Waste Management of the Desert was selected as one of the M0 finalists in the RFP process with the County of Riverside regarding the Edom Hill replacement facility. This item will go before the Board of Supervisor Tuesday, February 5 at 1:30 p.m., the same time as the City Council Meeting in La Quinta. Mr. Orlett is out of the country; therefore, I must attend the Board of Supervisor meeting in Riverside. As we discussed on Monday, Waste Management of the Desert wiH need to reschedule the presentation to the La Quinta City Council regarding the transfer station. Thank you for your consideration, and if you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me at (760) 340-5901. Respectfully, 1 Deborah MWYalreY Municipal Marketing Man cc: Frank Orlett, District Manager 02-05-02 10:50 RECEIVED FROM:7603402732 r�q 1c)3, P.02 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE ITEM: BERKELEY • DAVIS • IRVINE • LOS ANGELES • MERCED • RIVERSIDE • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO = _ = o SANTA BARBARA • SA MIN a, UCR FORECASTING CENTER THE A. GARY ANDERSON GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92521-0203 January 14, 2002 Tom Genovese City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Tom: Telephone: (909)187-2758 Facsimile: (909) 7�7-39 71 o I hope you enjoyed Dr.Bazdarich's 2002 Economic Forecast on January 7 at the Mc Callum Theater. As you know, the College of the Desert in collaboration with the UCR Forecasting Center hosted the event. Since its establishment in 1993, the UCR Forecasting Center has operated as a valuable business community resource by providing economic data, analysis and consulting expertise on the Riverside - San Bernardino economy. Over the past nine years, we have presented many seminars and programs across the Inland Valley region of Southern California. We have provided countless interviews to the print and electronic media and have worked on several major, groundbreaking projects for both our corporate and public sponsors. As an additional service, the Center publishes and distributes an economic newsletter, the Inland Empire Review, to a wide audience of organizations (both public and private). This monthly publication is widely regarded as a valuable source of insightful and comprehensive analysis of the Riverside -San Bernardino economy and society. This year, we are embarking on a major effort to enhance the role of the UCR Forecasting Center in the Coachella Valley by expanding the reach of our analyses, the breadth of our databases, and the services offered to our Sponsors. Accomplishing this requires additional funding. We hope to address these funding needs in a variety of ways, one of which is to expand our list of major Center Sponsors. Therefore I would like to invite the City of La Quinta to become a major Sponsor of the UCR Forecasting Center at the A. Gary Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California, Riverside. If your organization would like to become a major Sponsor of the Forecast Center at UCR, you will receive the following direct benefits and services: 1) 10 complimentary tickets to the Coachella Valley Economic Forecast Breakfast held in January at the Mc Callum Theater; 3) An invitation to 2 quarterly forecast update luncheons specially conducted for the Center's major Sponsors throughout the academic year; 4) On-line access to the Center's website and economic database containing 1,500 time series (with more to come!), thereby allowing your organization to have on -going comprehensive coverage of the Inland Empire economy, 5) Sponsorship recognition at all Forecast Center events and on its website. 6) Access to the consulting expertise of our Center as well as other services, which can be specially adapted to meet the specific needs of your organization. (Note: these special projects are quoted separately and are offered on a cost -basis to our Sponsors.) To become a major Sponsor, we ask that you make an annual contribution of $5,000 to the Forecast Center. Current sponsors include the City of Riverside, the City of Murrieta, the City of Ontario, the Riverside County Economic Development Agency, the County of San Bernardino, the Press -Enterprise, Fleetwood Enterprises, and, of course, our founding sponsor, City National Bank. Tom, we hope that your organization will decide to add its name to this impressive list. We are working hard to make the Forecast Center an even greater resource to the Coachella Valley business community and believe that your sponsorship of the Center will provide your organization with great value as well! Sincerel , Alan H. Lewis Executive Director, UCR Forecasting Center w FROM : BURTON COMPANY PHONE NO. : 7r WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE ITEM: � CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY Serving the desert Communities February 6, 2002 Mayor John. Pena Coun►cilpersons: Stanley SnifT, Mayor Pro Tem Donald Adolph Ferry Henderson Ron Perkins Attn: Wanda By Fax: 777-7101 Honorable Mayor and City Council: l;��lty 1�.�rk��r- .u�cl 1�i4�1�<ar�� ;'t. ()1i�,t7:�r►1 4:;-500 NIL pi) I�-rv% AvcIIt] C, f'aIof I)c,ticrr, <.'A 0226 17()0j .,d 1 -18SI (I')09) 8,%50 4--() I-,i%, .As you know, the Palm Desert campus of Cal State San Bernardino will open with a black tie gala on March 18& 2002. The theme: Commencement. This will be the start of a four-year university for desert residents from the Coachella Valley to earn either a four-year degree or Masters degree for the first time in the desert, Residents of Ea Quinta will now be able to take of advantage of a. "local" campus. Education will be affordable and for once —practical. No more driving long distances for classes or the need to balance "work -time" with "drive -time". While the gala grand opening will be spectacular, with a theme of "Fire and Ice,"; a caterer who traditionally done the Oscar's and Emmy's; remarkable table gifts and more than one surprise for every gift. At the same time, we have adhered to a budget- We are now looking for "Angels" to underwrite the event so that node of the $19 million raised will be expended on anything but future construction. While the gala opening was originally planned as a thank you for individuals contributing in the seven figure range, Burton IDolensek, in conjunction with Carol Adney, Dick Oliphant and Betty Barker decided to make it o t N Establ}shed by CgIHgrnia State University, San Bernardino 02-09-02 13:52 RECEIVED FROM:760 773 0018 P•01 FROM : BURTON COMPANY PHONE NO. : 760 773 001e Feb. 09 2-1002 03: 3 7 PM P2 Page Two a fund raiser. Platinum sponsorships start at $25,000 and go to as little as $2,500 in the bronze "angel" category. We would like the City of La Quinta to ser%ye as either a silver or bronze angel in the amount of $5,000 to $2,5000, The $5,000 contribution includes two tables of ten for the gala, local publicity as an angel, a half page in the program and projection of your name on the scrim during the event. The $2,500 sponsorship offers one table, Cal State's gratitude and mention in the program and marketing program. Please remember that the sponsorship underwriting packages include not just the gala .... but the grand opening to the public in late Spring. There is a certain satisfaction in looking back in the future to remember you launched a four year university in the Coachella 'Walley. ;Z=4zl� Susan Burton. kL4,--1 Nancy Dolensek SB/ND/jmj 0. 02-09-02 13:53 RECEIVED FRCM:760 773 0018 P-02 T a 4t!t 4 XPa�rw COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Demand Register Dated February 19, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Approve Demand Register Dated February 19, 2002 BACKGROUND: Prepaid Warrants: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION CONSENT CALENDAR STUDY SESSION PUBLIC HEARING 48199 - 482201 53,037.40 48221 - 482361 6,945.60 48237 - 482441 49,511.14 48245 - 48249) 10,536.55 48250 - 482561 25,947.81 48257 - 482631 3,802.00 Wire Transfers} 320,157.95 P/R 8247 - 82631 112,576.96 P/R Tax Transfers} 31,830.13 CITY DEMANDS $9025943.63 Payable Warrants: 48264 - 484141 2,324,037.17 RDA DEMANDS 250355439.08 $25938,382.71 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Demand of Cash - City M. Falconer, Fi ance Director $9025943.63 $2,938,382.71 of CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK TRANSACTIONS 1/30/02 - 2/12/02 2/1/02 WIRE TRANSFER - DEFERRED COMP $5,749.96 2/1/02 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS $9,608.29 2/1/02 WIRE TRANSFER - CREDIT UNION $5,171.70 2/1/02 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $65,000.00 2/5/02 WIRE TRANSFER - MIRA FLORES ESCROW $104,628.00 2/7/02 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $65,000.00 2/8/02 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $65,000.00 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT $320,157.95 015 002 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 4:25PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** PAYMENT AMOUNT 48264 02/13/02 &01624 ALL CREATURES VETERINARY 384.00 48265 02/13/02 &01625 TRISTAN BAKER 55.00 48266 02/13/02 &01626 CHRISTOPHER HATFIELD 55.00 48267 02/13/02 &01627 DEANNA LAUENROTH 60.00 48268 02/13/02 &01628 MAZDA SUPERSTORE 250.00 48269 02/13/02 &01629 DIANE MC COOL 20.00 48270 02/13/02 &01630 JEANNICE MIDDAUGH 48.00 48271 02/13/02 &01632 KRISTA STELTER 45.00 48272 02/13/02 &01633 SUSAN SPENCER 48.00 48273 02/13/02 &01635 NORM BARKELEY 25.00 48274 02/13/02 &01636 BOB EDWARDS CONSTRUCTION 43.20 48275 02/13/02 &01637 FISHERMANS MKT & GRILL 24.00 48276 02/13/02 &01638 CARL LEWIS 10.00 48277 02/13/02 &01639 GAYLE PEACOR 300.00 48278 02/13/02 &01640 DIAMOND WHOLESALE NATL 30.00 48279 02/13/02 AlRO01 A-1 RENTS 98.23 48280 02/13/02 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 1130.46 48281 02/13/02 ACT100 ACT GIS INC 2720.00 48282 02/13/02 ADT100 ADT SECURITY SVC INC 2929.54 48283 02/13/02 AIK100 PATRICIA AIKEN DBA BROKEN 630.00 48284 02/13/02 ALC050 BOB ALCALA 112.00 48285 02/13/02 ALL100 ALLIANCE SERVICE STATION 1315.65 48286 02/13/02 AMB100 ROBERT AMBRIZ 14.00 48287 02/13/02 AME001 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUP 497.00 48288 02/13/02 AME100 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL 93.00 48289 02/13/02 AME175 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES 63.00 48290 02/13/02 AME200 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS 88.15 48291 02/13/02 ANI050 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT 123.65 48292 02/13/02 ANW100 AN-WIL BAG CO 400.83 48293 02/13/02 ARC100 ARCH 1372.94 48294 02/13/02 ATC010 ATCO INTERNATIONAL 581.30 48295 02/13/02 AUT030 AUTOMATED TELECOM 1275.72 48296 02/13/02 BAN150 BANK OF NEW YORK 1500.00 48297 02/13/02 BAR001 RAMON R BARBA 1125.00 48298 02/13/02 BER150 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC 14505.50 48299 02/13/02 BOG100 SHARON BOGAN 138.60 48300 02/13/02 BRE100 TOM BREWSTER PHOTOGRAPHY 855.28 48301 02/13/02 BUR200 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS 175.25 48302 02/13/02 CAD010 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 207.39 48303 02/13/02 CAL240 CALIFORNIA POOLS & SPAS 500.00 48304 02/13/02 CAP050 ROSMARY CAPUTO 301.00 48305 02/13/02 CAR030 C A R E PROGRAM 2499.00 48306 02/13/02 CDW050 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 1117.79 48307 02/13/02 CEN010 CENTURY FORMS INC 126.28 48308 02/13/02 COA030 COACHELLA VALLEY INSURANC 68.00 48309 02/13/02 COA060 COACHELLA VALLEY MOSQUITO 180881.03 48310 02/13/02 COA083 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 478729.00 010 003 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 4:25PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 2 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT 48311 02/13/02 COL020 PAT COLE 479.50 48312 02/13/02 COM015 COMPUTER U LEARNING CENTR 712.50 48313 02/13/02 COM030 COMSERCO 50.00 48314 02/13/02 COR150 CORPORATE EXPRESS 1343.00 48315 02/13/02 COS050 COSTCO BUSINESS DELIVERY 866.84 48316 02/13/02 CPR150 CPRS SUPERVISORS SECTION 35.00 48317 02/13/02 CRA050 DANIEL CRAWFORD JR 143.04 48318 02/13/02 DAN200 DANONE WATERS OF NORTH 345.90 48319 02/13/02 DBX100 DBX INC 133336.30 48320 02/13/02 DEP150 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 105.00 48321 02/13/02 DES013 DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE 177707.50 48322 02/13/02 DES018 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 358.39 48323 02/13/02 DES051 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHL 855200.53 48324 02/13/02 DES060 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO 2237.20 48325 02/13/02 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC 4605.88 48326 02/13/02 DIB100 T DI BERNARDO DBA ALL 4990.00 48327 02/13/02 DOU200 LES DOUGLAS 115.50 48328 02/13/02 DRU100 DRUMMOND AMERICAN CORP 7807.16 48329 02/13/02 ECK100 HARRIET ECKSTEIN 84.00 48330 02/13/02 EC0004 ECOLAB 198.13 48331 02/13/02 EIS010 EISENHOWER IMMEDIATE CARE 135.00 48332 02/13/02 EXP200 EXPRESS DETAIL 1000.00 48333 02/13/02 FIR007 FIRST AID SELECT 247.87 48334 02/13/02 FIR015 FIRST AMERICAN REAL 141.37 48335 02/13/02 FRA030 FRANKLIN COVEY 153.04 48336 02/13/02 GAT015 GATEWAY BUSINESS 7425.11 48337 02/13/02 GE0010 GEORGE'S GOODYEAR 136.18 48338 02/13/02 GUM050 BRAD GUMMER 364.00 48339 02/13/02 HAR100 JOHN HARDCASTLE 40.32 48340 02/13/02 HEG050 HEGGE ELECTRICAL 170.00 48341 02/13/02 HEN100 HENRY'S GLASS CO 212.73 48342 02/13/02 HIL150 HILTON FARNKOPF & 1162.50 48343 02/13/02 HOA010 HUGH HOARD INC 314.23 48344 02/13/02 HOM030 HOME DEPOT 1560.61 48345 02/13/02 H00050 FAYE HOOPER 125.00 48346 02/13/02 HOR100 DODIE HORVITZ 83.05 48347 02/13/02 HPE100 HP EXPRESS SVC 799.00 48348 02/13/02 INF030 INFORMATION RESOURCES 170.00 48349 02/13/02 INT014 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF 50.00 48350 02/13/02 JAC150 STEVEN JACOBS 308.00 48351 02/13/02 JON040 KARYN JONES 138.00 48352 02/13/02 JPRO10 JP REPROGRAPHICS 466.89 48353 02/13/02 KIN050 KINKO'S 159.22 48354 02/13/02 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 13368.39 48355 02/13/02 KRI100 BRUCE KRIBBS CONSTRUCTION 7400.00 48356 02/13/02 LAQ066 LA QUINTA HS BAND BOOSTER 2499.00 48357 02/13/02 LES020 JANELLE LESLIE 36.40 48358 02/13/02 LIV050 LIVING DESERT RESERVE 1000.00 48359 02/13/02 L00010 LOCK SHOP INC 172.02 01 004 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 4:25PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 3 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT 48360 02/13/02 LOW100 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC 349.41 48361 02/13/02 LUN050 LUNDEEN PACIFIC CORP 41163.48 48362 02/13/02 MAR300 MARTEL ELECTRONICS INC 612.17 48363 02/13/02 MCDO10 MC DOWELL AWARDS 39.76 48364 02/13/02 MEE100 WAYNE MEEDS 50.00 48365 02/13/02 MUN010 MUNI FINANCIAL SERV INC 3963.50 48366 02/13/02 MUN175 IRVING MUNOWITZ 525.00 48367 02/13/02 NAW010 RON NAWROCKI 1000.00 48368 02/13/02 NEX010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 2409.38 48369 02/13/02 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 14145.50 48370 02/13/02 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 932.91 48371 02/13/02 OLI100 OLINN MESSAGE CENTER 106.95 48372 02/13/02 PAR125 RACHEL PARRISH 113.40 48373 02/13/02 PIT100 NOEL PITTMAN 406.00 48374 02/13/02 POW100 POWERS AWARDS 43.42 48375 02/13/02 PRE015 THE PRESS -ENTERPRISE CO 833.16 48376 02/13/02 PUB100 PUBLIC PERSONNEL CONSULT 300.00 48377 02/13/02 PUR100 PURKISS ROSE-RSI 481.01 48378 02/13/02 RAL050 RALPHS GROCERY CO 197.67 48379 02/13/02 RAS020 RASA - ERIC NELSON 2115.00 48380 02/13/02 RES005 RESERVE ACCOUNT 4000.00 48381 02/13/02 RIE200 PAT RIENSCHE 3537.80 48382 02/13/02 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS 4636.80 48383 02/13/02 RIV120 RIV COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT 96682.02 48384 02/13/02 RIV130 RIVERSIDE CNTY PURCHASING 109.08 48385 02/13/02 RIV152 RIV COUNTY TRANSPORTATION 11418.00 48386 02/13/02 ROB200 SCOTT ROBERTSON 189.00 48387 02/13/02 ROT100 ROTO ROOTER 149.28 48388 02/13/02 SAX100 SAXON ENGINEERING SERVICE 1575.00 48389 02/13/02 SIN050 PAUL SINGER P E 6320.00 48390 02/13/02 SKY200 SKYTEL 16.48 48391 02/13/02 SOU003 SOUND IMAGE 529.07 48392 02/13/02 SOU007 SOUTHWEST NETWORKS, INC 12077.01 48393 02/13/02 STA045 STAN'S AUTO TECH 994.11 48394 02/13/02 STA050 STAPLES 289.27 48395 02/13/02 SUN075 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY 438.00 48396 02/13/02 SUN080 SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP 496.75 48397 02/13/02 TER010 TERRA -CAL CONST INC 122400.00 48398 02/13/02 TER100 TERRA NOVA PLANNING & 16543.70 48399 02/13/02 TKDO10 T.K.D. ASSOCIATES INC 318.55 48400 02/13/02 TOP010 TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 206.88 48401 02/13/02 TRIO10 TRI LAKE CONSULTANTS INC 22262.50 48402 02/13/02 TRU010 TRULY NOLEN INC 63.00 48403 02/13/02 UNIO01 UNITED CEREBARL PALSY 1250.00 48404 02/13/02 USB050 U.S.BANK TRUST NATL ASSOC 362.50 48405 02/13/02 USH100 USHERWOOD & ASSOC OF CAL 31.96 48406 02/13/02 VAN075 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOC INC 1800.00 48407 02/13/02 VID050 VIDEO DEPOT 19.90 48408 02/13/02 VON010 VON'S C/O SAFEWAY INC 17.25 01 L3 005 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 4:25PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 4 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT 48409 02/13/02 WAL010 WAL MART COMMUNITY 110.80 48410 02/13/02 WES020 WEST GROUP 152.65 48411 02/13/02 WLC100 WLC ARCHITECTS INC 12500.00 48412 02/13/02 W00100 DEBBIE WOODRUFF 406.00 48413 02/13/02 XER050 XESYSTEMS INC 365.00 48414 02/13/02 YOU100 YOUNG ENGINEERING SERVICE 3850.00 CHECK TOTAL 2,324,037.17 006 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 3:34PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 1 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. &01624 ALL CREATURES VETERINARY 101 000 416 000 1872 REFUND BUSINESS LIC OVER 384.00 T204 1 VENDOR TOTAL 384.00 &01625 TRISTAN BAKER 101 000 437 000 14209 REFUND CLASS 55.00 T204 2 VENDOR TOTAL 55.00 &01626 CHRISTOPHER HATFIELD 101 000 437 000 14214 REFUND CLASS 55.00 T204 3 VENDOR TOTAL 55.00 &01627 DEANNA LAUENROTH 101 000 437 000 14208 REFUND CLASS 60.00 T204 4 VENDOR TOTAL 60.00 &01628 MAZDA SUPERSTORE 101 000 416 000 6001 REFUND BUSINESS LIC/OVER 250.00 T204 5 VENDOR TOTAL 250.00 &01629 DIANE MC COOL 101 000 437 000 14259 REFUND CLASS 20.00 T204 6 VENDOR TOTAL 20.00 &01630 JEANNICE MIDDAUGH 101 000 437 000 14212 REFUND CLASS 48.00 T204 7 VENDOR TOTAL 48.00 &01632 KRISTA STELTER 101 000 437 000 14210 REFUND CLASS 45.00 T204 8 VENDOR TOTAL 45.00 &01633 SUSAN SPENCER 101 000 437 000 14213 REFUND CLASS 48.00 T204 81 VENDOR TOTAL 48.00 &01635 NORM BARKELEY 101 000 438 000 14261 REFUND CLASS 25.00 T208 1 VENDOR TOTAL 25.00 &01636 BOB EDWARDS CONSTRUCTION 101 000 418 000 0111-291 REFUND BUILDING PERMIT C 43.20 T208 2 VENDOR TOTAL 43.20 &01637 FISHERMANS MKT & GRILL 101 000 416 000 6691 REFUND BUSINESS LIC OVER 24.00 T208 3 O �, ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 3:34PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 2 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. VENDOR TOTAL 24.00 &01638 CARL LEWIS 101 000 438 000 14545 REFUND CLASS 10.00 T208 4 VENDOR TOTAL 10.00 &01639 GAYLE PEACOR 101 000 263 000 REFUND SNR CNTR DEPOSIT 300.00 T212 1 VENDOR TOTAL 300.00 &01640 DIAMOND WHOLESALE NATL 101 000 416 000 REFUND BUSINESS LIC OVER 30.00 T212 2 VENDOR TOTAL 30.00 AlRO01 A-1 RENTS 101 453 703 847 57422 SUPPLIES 14.23 T208 5 AlRO01 A-1 RENTS 101 453 615 000 57600 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 44.80 T212 3 AlRO01 A-1 RENTS 101 453 615 000 57611 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 39.20 T212 4 VENDOR TOTAL 98.23 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 101 357 703 000 72470 SUPPLIES 65.20 T212 5 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 101 357 703 000 72370 SUPPLIES 141.62 T212 6 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 101 357 703 000 72124 SUPPLIES 70.62 T212 7 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 101 453 703 847 72164 SUPPLIES 99.99 T212 8 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 101 454 609 000 72261 SUPPLIES 77.98 T212 9 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 101 454 703 825 72163 SUPPLIES 66.65 T212 10 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 501 501 619 649 72163 SUPPLIES 8.00 T212 11 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 101 454 609 000 72120 SUPPLIES 60.78 T212 12 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 101 454 609 000 72363 SUPPLIES 40.64 T212 13 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 101 453 703 833 72429 SUPPLIES 128.49 T212 14 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 101 453 703 847 72119 SUPPLIES 108.56 T212 15 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 101 454 703 847 72485 SUPPLIES 44.97 T212 16 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 101 454 703 847 72364 SUPPLIES 65.52 T212 17 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 101 454 703 847 72435 SUPPLIES 23.42 T212 18 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 101 453 703 833 72320 SUPPLIES 63.77 T212 19 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 101 453 703 847 72267 SUPPLIES 64.25 T212 20 VENDOR TOTAL 1130.46 ACT100 ACT GIS INC 502 502 609 609 2002-165 GIS ASSISTANCE 2720.00 T208 6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 3:34PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 3 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. VENDOR TOTAL 2720.00 ADT100 ADT SECURITY SVC INC 101 453 609 640 53766072 ALARM SVC 15.00 T212 21 ADT100 ADT SECURITY SVC INC 101 454 609 640 53766072 ALARM SVC 15.00 T212 22 ADT100 ADT SECURITY SVC INC 101 202 609 640 03249125 ALARM CONVERTED TO ADT 967.38 T212 23 ADT100 ADT SECURITY SVC INC 101 202 609 640 03249126 ALARM CONVERTED TO ADT 1661.14 T212 24 ADT100 ADT SECURITY SVC INC 101 202 609 640 03310900 ALARM SVC 1/15/02 - 2/28 224.02 T212 25 ADT100 ADT SECURITY SVC INC 101 202 609 640 03310899 ALARM SVC 47.00 T212 26 VENDOR TOTAL 2929.54 AIK100 PATRICIA AIKEN DBA BROKEN 101 253 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 630.00 T204 9 VENDOR TOTAL 630.00 ALC050 BOB ALCALA 101 202 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 112.00 T208 8 VENDOR TOTAL 112.00 ALL100 ALLIANCE SERVICE STATION 501 501 619 646 2/1 - 2/ FUEL PURCHASES 296.06 T208 9 ALL100 ALLIANCE SERVICE STATION 501 501 619 649 2319 VEHICLE REPAIRS 39.77 T208 10 ALL100 ALLIANCE SERVICE STATION 501 501 619 646 1/15 - 1 FUEL PURCHASES 979.82 T208 11 VENDOR TOTAL 1315.65 AMB100 ROBERT AMBRIZ 101 202 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 14.00 T208 7 VENDOR TOTAL 14.00 AME001 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUP 101 454 703 825 1167736- SUPPLIES 497.00 T212 27 VENDOR TOTAL 497.00 AME100 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL 101 104 643 000 EMPLOYMENT ADS 93.00 T208 14 VENDOR TOTAL 93.00 AME175 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES 101 301 609 586 10945 BOOKING BLOOD DRAW 63.00 T204 10 VENDOR TOTAL 63.00 AME200 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS 101 202 609 634 L676427 MATS 29.88 T208 12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 3:34PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 4 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. AME200 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS 101 202 609 634 L665972 MATS 58.27 T208 13 VENDOR TOTAL 88.15 AN1050 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT 101 353 703 815 1002753 SUPPLIES 123.65 T212 28 VENDOR TOTAL 123.65 ANW100 AN-WIL BAG CO 101 453 703 834 5956 ASPHALT SUPPLIES 400.83 T208 15 VENDOR TOTAL 400.83 ARC100 ARCH 101 153 635 660 K6220639 PAGER SVC 511.03 T204 11 ARC100 ARCH 101 153 635 660 K3393252 PAGER SVC 181.78 T204 12 ARC100 ARCH 101 153 635 660 K3393252 PAGER SVC -16.12 T204 13 ARC100 ARCH 101 153 635 660 16220639 PAGER SVC 458.41 T204 14 ARC100 ARCH 101 153 635 660 13393252 PAGER SVC 237.84 T212 29 VENDOR TOTAL 1372.94 ATC010 ATCO INTERNATIONAL 101 453 703 847 017041 DEGREASER 581.30 T208 16 VENDOR TOTAL 581.30 AUT030 AUTOMATED TELECOM 101 153 635 660 145478 PAGER SVC 82.50 T212 30 AUT030 AUTOMATED TELECOM 101 153 635 660 2602 WIRELESS PHONE 541.99 T212 31 AUT030 AUTOMATED TELECOM 101 153 635 660 13102 WIRELESS PHONE/ACCESSORI 618.96 T212 32 AUT030 AUTOMATED TELECOM 101 153 635 660 2602-1 WIRELESS PHONE/ACCESSORI 32.27 T212 33 VENDOR TOTAL 1275.72 BAN150 BANK OF NEW YORK 101 151 607 000 60532012 QTRLY ADMIN FEE 1500.00 T208 17 VENDOR TOTAL 1500.00 BAR001 RAMON R BARBA 101 352 609 615 3748 LOT CLEANING/WEED ABATEM 175.00 T208 18 BAR001 RAMON R BARBA 101 352 609 615 3542 LOT CLEANING/WEED ABATEM 325.00 T208 19 BAR001 RAMON R BARBA 101 352 609 615 3082 LOT CLEANING/WEED ABATEM 200.00 T208 20 BAR001 RAMON R BARBA 101 352 609 615 3627 LOT CLEANING/WEED ABATEM 425.00 T208 21 VENDOR TOTAL 1125.00 BER150 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC 101 452 609 557 23752 PLAN CHECK SVC 183.00 T212 34 O 1�+ O C7 !, 1 t C,-� ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 3:34PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 5 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. BER150 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC 101 452 609 557 23754 PLAN CHECK SVC 1314.75 T212 35 BER150 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC 101 452 609 557 23751 PLAN CHECK SVC 183.00 T212 36 BER150 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC 101 452 609 557 23753 PLAN CHECK SVC 244.00 T212 37 BER150 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC 101 452 609 557 23489 PLAN CHECK SVC 1089.75 T212 38 BER150 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC 101 452 609 557 23487 PLAN CHECK SVC 953.00 T212 39 BER150 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC 101 452 609 557 23486 PLAN CHECK SVC 488.00 T212 40 BER150 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC 101 451 603 000 20773 INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIR 10050.00 T212 61 VENDOR TOTAL 14505.50 BOG100 SHARON BOGAN 101 202 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 138.60 T208 22 VENDOR TOTAL 138.60 BRE100 TOM BREWSTER PHOTOGRAPHY 101 104 656 000 4923 PHOTOS 855.28 T204 15 VENDOR TOTAL 855.28 BUR200 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS 101 153 703 803 315553 SUPPLIES 175.25 T208 23 VENDOR TOTAL 175.25 CAD010 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 101 357 617 000 27528 UNIFORMS 7.08 T204 16 CAD010 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 101 453 617 000 27529 UNIFORMS 81.00 T208 24 CAD010 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 101 454 617 000 27529 UNIFORMS 23.81 T208 25 CAD010 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 101 453 617 000 25961 UNIFORMS 66.42 T212 41 CAD010 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 101 454 617 000 25961 UNIFORMS 22.00 T212 42 CAD010 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 101 357 617 000 29560 UNIFORMS 7.b8 T212 43 VENDOR TOTAL 207.39 CAL240 CALIFORNIA POOLS & SPAS 101 454 609 000 20148 FOUNTAIN MAINT/ESTADO 200.00 T208 41 CAL240 CALIFORNIA POOLS & SPAS 101 454 609 000 20692 FOUNTAIN SVC/ESTADO 200.00 T212 44 CAL240 CALIFORNIA POOLS & SPAS 101 357 609 643 20290 FOUNTAIN SVC/CITY HALL 100.00 T212 45 VENDOR TOTAL 500.00 CAP050 ROSMARY CAPUTO 101 202 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 301.00 T208 26 VENDOR TOTAL 301.00- CAR030 C A R E PROGRAM 101 251 663 000 COMMUNITY SVC GRANT 2499.00 T208 27 O 1--� ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 3:34PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 6 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. VENDOR TOTAL 2499.00 CDW050 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 101 253 703 000 FD40162 SAFTWARE/ADOBE PHOTOSHOP 498.45 T204 18 CDW050 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 502 502 703 811 FF92607 CD-RW DRIVES 371.29 T212 46 CDW050 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 502 502 703 811 FG63729 SUPPLIES 248.05 T212 48 VENDOR TOTAL 1117.79 CEN010 CENTURY FORMS INC 101 301 609 562 51295 BUSINESS CARDS 126.28 T212 47 VENDOR TOTAL 126.28 COA030 COACHELLA VALLEY INSURANC 101 000 438 457 INSURANCE/SNR CTR EVENT 68.00 T212 49 VENDOR TOTAL 68.00 COA060 COACHELLA VALLEY MOSQUITO 301 901 822 000 TAX PASS THRU PYMNT 116203.40 T204 19 COA060 COACHELLA VALLEY MOSQUITO 302 904 822 000 TAX PASS THRU PYMNT 64677.63 T204 20 VENDOR TOTAL 180881.03 COA083 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 301 901 821 000 TAX PASS THRU PYMNT 126168.78 T204 21 COA083 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 302 904 821 000 TAX PASS THRU PYMT 352560.22 T204 22 VENDOR TOTAL 478729.00 COL020 PAT COLE 101 202 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 479.50 T208 28 VENDOR TOTAL 479.50 COM015 COMPUTER U LEARNING CENTR 101 202 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 712.50 T208 29 VENDOR TOTAL 712.50 COM030 COMSERCO 101 301 609 580 03028355 VIDEO CAMERA REPAIR 50.00 T212 50 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 COR150 CORPORATE EXPRESS 101 401 701 000 01DI9258 SUPPLIES 190.98 T204 23 COR150 CORPORATE EXPRESS 101 153 703 802 01DI9258 SUPPLIES 186.64 T204 24 COR150 CORPORATE EXPRESS 101 401 701 000 01DK3443 SUPPLIES 230.28 T212 51 COR150 CORPORATE EXPRESS 101 401 701 000 01DK3287 SUPPLIES 250.22 T212 52 � O N ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 3:34PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 7 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. COR150 CORPORATE EXPRESS 101 401 701 000 01DJ8408 SUPPLIES 484.88 T212 53 VENDOR TOTAL 1343.00 COS050 COSTCO BUSINESS DELIVERY 101 151 701 000 2061410- SUPPLIES 36.92 T208 30 COS050 COSTCO BUSINESS DELIVERY 101 153 703 802 2061410- SUPPLIES 307.71 T208 31 COS050 COSTCO BUSINESS DELIVERY 101 153 703 884 2061410- SUPPLIES 52.29 T208 32 COS050 COSTCO BUSINESS DELIVERY 101 153 703 802 2099896- SUPPLIES 469.92 T212 54 VENDOR TOTAL 866.84 CPR150 CPRS SUPERVISORS SECTION 101 251 637 000 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 35.00 T204 17 VENDOR TOTAL 35.00 CRA050 DANIEL CRAWFORD JR 101 104 655 593 EDUCATION REIMB 143.04 T208 43 VENDOR TOTAL 143.04 DAN200 DANONE WATERS OF NORTH 101 153 703 882 0210537- DRINKING WATER 148.30 T208 33 DAN200 DANONE WATERS OF NORTH 101 153 703 882 0210582- DRINKING WATER 76.85 T208 34 DAN200 DANONE WATERS OF NORTH 101 153 703 882 0210505- DRINKING WATER 120.75 T208 35 VENDOR TOTAL 345.90 DBX100 DBX INC 401 709 609 553 2000-17 TRAFFIG SIG/TAMPICO-BERM 133336.30 T208 36 VENDOR TOTAL 133336.30 DEP150 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 101 301 609 586 376550 BLOOD ALCOHOL ANALYSIS 105.00 T208 37 VENDOR TOTAL 105.00 DES013 DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE 302 904 827 000 TAX PASS THRU AGREEMENT 177707.50 T204 25 VENDOR TOTAL 177707.50 DES018 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 101 454 703 847 607333-0 SUPPLIES 334.05 T208 38 DES018 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 101 357 703 000 609887-0 LIGHTS 24.34 T212 55 VENDOR TOTAL 358.39 DES051 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHL 302 904 824 000 TAX PASS THRU AGREEMENT 855200.53 T204 26 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 3:34PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 8 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. VENDOR TOTAL 855200.53 DES060 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO 101 151 643 000 1851439 LEGAL ADVERTISING 256.90 T212 56 DES060 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO 101 201 643 000 1851439 LEGAL ADVERTISING 1113.00 T212 57 DES060 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO 101 401 643 000 1851439 LEGAL ADVERTISING 867.30 T212 58 VENDOR TOTAL 2237.20 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC 101 151 505 534 1127 CONTRACT SVC 344.00 T204 27 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC 101 251 505 534 1127 CONTRACT SVC 812.70 T204 28 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC 101 354 505 534 1127 CONTRACT SVC 1529.60 T204 29 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC 101 151 505 534 1270 CONTRACT SVC 278.40 T208 44 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC 101 451 505 534 1127 CONTRACT SVC 276.70 T208 45 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC 101 354 505 534 1270 CONTRACT SVC 278.40 T212 59 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC 101 451 603 000 1270 CONTRACT SVC 1086.08 T212 60 VENDOR TOTAL 4605.88 DIB100 T DI BERNARDO DBA ALL 101 454 621 628 TREAT PALM TREES 2495.00 T208 39 DIB100 T DI BERNARDO DBA ALL 101 454 621 628 TREAT PALM TREES 2495.00 T208 40 VENDOR TOTAL 4990.00 DOU200 LES DOUGLAS 101 202 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 115.50 T208 46 VENDOR TOTAL 115.50 DRU100 DRUMMOND AMERICAN CORP 101 453 703 834 07-88594 TAMPER 2717.42 T208 47 DRU100 DRUMMOND AMERICAN CORP 101 453 703 834 8888329 TAMPER 5089.74 T208 48 VENDOR TOTAL 7807.16 ECK100 HARRIET ECKSTEIN 101 202 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 84.00 T208 49 VENDOR TOTAL 84.00 ECO004 ECOLAB 101 202 703 000 5869573 SUPPLIES 198.13 T208 5C VENDOR TOTAL 198.13 EISO10 EISENHOWER IMMEDIATE CARE 101 104 605 000 EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 135.00 T204 3C d Q ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 3:34PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 9 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. VENDOR TOTAL 135.00 EXP200 EXPRESS DETAIL 501 501 619 649 45855 VEHICLE MAINT 500.00 T204 31 EXP200 EXPRESS DETAIL 501 501 619 649 45699 VEHICLE MAINT 500.00 T212 62 VENDOR TOTAL 1000.00 FIR007 FIRST AID SELECT 101 355 703 819 303002 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 247.87 T212 63 VENDOR TOTAL 247.87 FIR015 FIRST AMERICAN REAL 101 351 609 000 20004825 METROSCAN SVC 141.37 T212 64 VENDOR TOTAL 141.37 FRA030 FRANKLIN COVEY 101 451 701 000 29594966 SUPPLIES 109.39 T208 42 FRA030 FRANKLIN COVEY 101 451 701 000 29630368 SUPPLIES 37.41 T208 51 FRA030 FRANKLIN COVEY 101 451 701 000 29647158 SUPPLIES 6.24 T212 65 VENDOR TOTAL 153.04 GAT015 GATEWAY BUSINESS 101 301 609 580 75034255 3 COMPUTERS/SOLO 9550B 7425.11 T204 32 VENDOR TOTAL 7425.11 GEO010 GEORGE'S GOODYEAR 501 501 619 649 040577 TIRE 136.18 T208 52 VENDOR TOTAL 136.18 GUM050 BRAD GUMMER 101 253 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 364.00 T204 33 VENDOR TOTAL 364.00 HAR100 JOHN HARDCASTLE 101 355 637 000 MILEAGE 30.08 T204 34 HAR100 JOHN HARDCASTLE 101 355 637 000 MILEAGE 10.24 T208 53 VENDOR TOTAL 40.32 HEG050 HEGGE ELECTRICAL 101 357 703 000 10376 ELECTRICAL OUTLET REPAIR 170.00 T212 66 VENDOR TOTAL 170.00 HEN100 HENRY'S GLASS CO 101 357 621 000 97683 WINDOW 112.10 T204 35 ram. Qn Clio ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 3:34PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 10 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. HEN100 HENRY'S GLASS CO 101 357 621 612 3434 REPAIRS 100.63 T212 67 VENDOR TOTAL 212.73 HIL150 HILTON FARNKOPF & 101 402 605 542 9704890 PROF SVC/AB939 IMPLEMENT 1162.50 T212 71 VENDOR TOTAL 1162.50 HOA010 HUGH HOARD INC 101 202 609 640 33648 SMOKE DETECTOR 314.23 T204 36 VENDOR TOTAL 314.23 HOM030 HOME DEPOT 101 454 703 847 8012078 SUPPLIES 442.90 T208 54 HOM030 HOME DEPOT 101 454 703 847 6120755 SUPPLIES 297.40 T208 55 HOM030 HOME DEPOT 101 454 703 847 6120754 SUPPLIES 300.48 T208 56 HOM030 HOME DEPOT 101 454 703 847 8090925 SUPPLIES 73.13 T208 57 HOM030 HOME DEPOT 101 454 703 847 0101028 SUPPLIES 362.58 T208 58 HOM030 HOME DEPOT 101 453 703 847 6021925 SUPPLIES 9.45 T212 68 HOM030 HOME DEPOT 101 453 703 847 6012060 SUPPLIES 74.67 T212 69 VENDOR TOTAL 1560.61 H00050 FAYE HOOPER 101 202 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 125.00 T208 59 VENDOR TOTAL 125.00 HOR100 DODIE HORVITZ 101 251 637 000 MILEAGE 83.05 T212 70 VENDOR TOTAL 83.05 HPE100 HP EXPRESS SVC 502 502 598 000 781805 MAINT CONTRACT/HP 1050C 799.00 T212 72 VENDOR TOTAL 799.00 INF030 INFORMATION RESOURCES 101 104 603 000 26872 EMP BACKGROUND CHECKS 170.00 T204 37 VENDOR TOTAL 170.00 INT014 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF 405 902 649 000 179885 DUES/M WEISS 32.50 T204 38 INT014 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF 406 905 649 000 179885 DUES/M WEISS 17.50 T204 39 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 JAC150 STEVEN JACOBS 101 253 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 308.00 T204 40 d Q ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5O03 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 3:34PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 11 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. VENDOR TOTAL 308.00 JON040 KARYN JONES 101 253 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 138.00 T204 60 VENDOR TOTAL 138.00 JPRO1O JP REPROGRAPHICS 101 402 647 000 52963 PRINTS 53.08 T212 73 JPRO1O JP REPROGRAPHICS 101 402 647 000 52965 PRINTS 141.15 T212 74 JPRO10 JP REPROGRAPHICS 401 639 605 000 94025 PRINTS 254.34 T212 75 JPRO10 JP REPROGRAPHICS 401 639 605 000 495 PRINTS 18.32 T212 76 VENDOR TOTAL 466.89 KIN05O KINKO'S 101 402 647 000 31010013 PRINTING 159.22 T212 77 VENDOR TOTAL 159.22 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 101 251 609 536 14693 EVENT EXP/DEC VILLAGE FA 1134.22 T204 41 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 101 251 609 536 14617 RETAINER FEB 2002 3500.00 T204 42 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 101 103 605 822 14614 RETAINER FEB 2002 3000.00 T204 43 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 101 103 605 822 14505 INFOMERCIAL IN ORANGE CO 5000.00 T204 44 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 101 251 605 822 14397 APPEARANCE IN GOLF CART 557.33 T204 45 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 101 251 663 657 14396 20TH ANNIVERSARY LOGO 176.84 T204 68 VENDOR TOTAL 13368.39 KRI100 BRUCE KRIBBS CONSTRUCTION 101 251 621 662 JAN 2002 INSPECTION FEE 40.00 T204 46 KRI100 BRUCE KRIBBS CONSTRUCTION 101 454 603 000 LMC60 LIGHTING REPAIRS 7360.00 T212 78 VENDOR TOTAL 7400.00 LAQ066 LA QUINTA HS BAND BOOSTER 101 251 663 000 COMMUNITY SVC GRANT 2499.00 T208 62 VENDOR TOTAL 2499.00 LES020 JANELLE LESLIE 101 202 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 36.40 T208 60 VENDOR TOTAL 36.40 LIV05O LIVING DESERT RESERVE 101 251 663 000 COMMUNITY SVC GRANT 1000.00 T208 61 VENDOR TOTAL 1000.00 LOCO1O LOCK SHOP INC 101 456 703 000 523747 LOCKS 172.02 T212 79 O F-+ W CD ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 3:34PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 12 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. VENDOR TOTAL 172.02 LOW100 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC 101 202 703 000 192538 SUPPLIES 198.45 T212 80 LOW100 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC 101 357 703 000 192538 SUPPLIES 63.61 T212 81 LOW100 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC 101 151 703 000 02080237 WALL BRACKET 82.94 T212 82 LOW100 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC 101 357 703 000 02080377 SUPPLIES 4.41 T212 83 VENDOR TOTAL 349.41 LUN050 LUNDEEN PACIFIC CORP 101 454 609 000 6787 LANDSCAPE MAINT 42115.49 T208 63 LUN050 LUNDEEN PACIFIC CORP 101 454 703 847 6787 OVERPAYMENT -2400.00 T208 64 LUN050 LUNDEEN PACIFIC CORP 101 454 609 000 6807 LANDSCAPE MAINT 1321.99 T208 65 LUN050 LUNDEEN PACIFIC CORP 101 454 703 000 6807 LANDSCAPE MAINT 126.00 T208 66 VENDOR TOTAL 41163.48 MAR300 MARTEL ELECTRONICS INC 101 357 853 000 110764 SIX MIC PACK 612.17 T208 67 VENDOR TOTAL 612.17 MCDO10 MC DOWELL AWARDS 101 201 701 000 305831 SIGNS 39.76 T204 47 VENDOR TOTAL 39.76 MEE100 WAYNE MEEDS 101 202 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 50.00 T208 68 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 MUNO10 MUNI FINANCIAL SERV INC 710 000 267 000 24177 LOCAL IMP DIST ADMIN 379.54 T208 69 MUNO10 MUNI FINANCIAL SERV INC 715 000 267 000 24177 LOCAL IMP DIST ADMIN 494.41 T208 70 MUNO10 MUNI FINANCIAL SERV INC 720 000 267 000 24177 LOCAL IMP DIST ADMIN 517.96 T208 71 MUNO10 MUNI FINANCIAL SERV INC 725 000 267 000 24177 LOCAL IMP DIST ADMIN 844.21 T208 72 MUNO10 MUNI FINANCIAL SERV INC 730 000 267 000 24177 LOCAL IMP DIST ADMIN 651.28 T208 73 MUNO10 MUNI FINANCIAL SERV INC 735 000 267 000 24177 LOCAL IMP DIST ADMIN 356.63 T208 74 MUNO10 MUNI FINANCIAL SERV INC 740 000 267 000 24177 LOCAL IMP DIST ADMIN 719.47 T208 75 VENDOR TOTAL 3963.50 MUN175 IRVING MUNOWITZ 101 202 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 525.00 T208 76 VENDOR TOTAL 525.00 NAZO10 RON NAWROCKI 401 692 605 000 2853 PROJECT SIGNS 1000.00 T212 84 © 00 f- ► ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 3:34PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 13 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. VENDOR TOTAL 1000.00 NEX010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 101 153 635 660 375905-7 WIRELESS PHONE SYS 2409.38 T212 85 VENDOR TOTAL 2409.38 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 101 451 603 000 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 212.50 T208 77 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 401 712 605 000 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 850.00 T208 78 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 401 702 605 000 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 680.00 T208 79 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 401 705 605 000 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 807.50 T208 80 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 401 694 605 000 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 552.50 T208 81 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 401 687 609 000 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 977.50 T208 82 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 401 709 605 000 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 127.50 T208 83 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 101 456 603 000 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 85.00 T208 84 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 401 715 605 532 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 85.00 T208 85 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 401 716 605 000 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 170.00 T208 86 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 401 639 605 532 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 382.50 T208 87 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 401 692 605 000 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 977.50 T208 88 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 401 702 605 000 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 150.00 T208 89 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 401 687 609 000 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 435.00 T208 90 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 401 712 605 000 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 240.00 T208 91 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 401 705 605 000 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 165.00 T208 92 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 401 692 605 000 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 210.00 T208 93 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 401 687 609 000 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 92.00 T208 94 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 401 717 605 532 2001-11/ PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 92.00 T208 95 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 101 452 603 000 2001-11- PROJECT MGMNT/TECHNICAL 6854.00 T212 86 VENDOR TOTAL 14145.50 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 101 351 701 000 14895859 SUPPLIES 28.54 T204 49 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 101 351 701 000 14852890 SUPPLIES 40.01 T204 50 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 101 251 701 000 14906798 SUPPLIES 24.70 T204 51 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 101 251 701 000 14876588 SUPPLIES 65.39 T204 52 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 101 153 703 811 14876077 SUPPLIES 109.69 T208 96 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 101 451 701 000 14876077 SUPPLIES 36.11 T208 97 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 101 451 701 000 14915831 SUPPLIES 50.99 T208 98 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 3:34PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 14 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 101 153 703 802 14942517 SUPPLIES 286.48 T208 99 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 101 201 701 000 14971796 SUPPLIES 38.45 T208 100 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 101 351 701 000 14985542 SUPPLIES 90.31 T212 87 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 101 151 701 000 14935781 SUPPLIES 53.79 T212 88 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 101 451 701 000 14940609 SUPPLIES 16.35 T212 89 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 101 452 703 000 14940609 SUPPLIES 92.10 T212 90 VENDOR TOTAL 932.91 OLI100 OLINN MESSAGE CENTER 101 353 609 583 2104 ANIMAL CONTROL ANSWERING 106.95 T212 91 VENDOR TOTAL 106.95 PAR125 RACHEL PARRISH 101 202 609 592 'INSTRUCTOR 113.40 T208 101 VENDOR TOTAL 113.40 PIT100 NOEL PITTMAN 101 202 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 406.00 T208 102 VENDOR TOTAL 406.00 POW100 POWERS AWARDS 101 104 656 000 70445 5 YR AWARD/CHRIS VOGT 30.64 T204 53 POW100 POWERS AWARDS 101 351 647 000 70936 SIGN 12.78 T212 92 VENDOR TOTAL 43.42 PRE015 THE PRESS -ENTERPRISE CO 101 104 643 000 194573 EMPLOYMENT ADS 833.16 T204 54 VENDOR TOTAL 833.16 PUB100 PUBLIC PERSONNEL CONSULT 101 104 703 808 ASSISSTANT ENGINEER II T 300.00 T204 55 VENDOR TOTAL 300.00 PUR100 PURKISS ROSE-RSI 401 694 609 000 3486 REPRODUCTION COST 481.01 T204 56 VENDOR TOTAL 481.01 RAL050 RALPHS GROCERY CO 101 357 703 000 10213945 COFFEE SUPPLIES 178.49 T212 93 RAL050 RALPHS GROCERY CO 101 357 703 000 10232167 CLEANING SUPPLIES 19.18 T212 94 VENDOR TOTAL 197.67 RAS020 RASA - ERIC NELSON 101 452 609 557 2406 PLAN CHECK SVC 2115.00 T208 103 o o �� ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 3:34PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 15 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. VENDOR TOTAL 2115.00 RES005 RESERVE ACCOUNT 101 153 645 000 11762499 POSTAGE FOR METER 4000.00 T208 104 VENDOR TOTAL 4000.00 RIE200 PAT RIENSCHE 101 202 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 3537.80 T208 105 VENDOR TOTAL 3537.80 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS 101 301 609 574 01-1107 BOOKING FEES 4636.80 T209 61 VENDOR TOTAL 4636.80 RIV120 RIV COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT 302 904 826 000 TAX PASS THRU PAYMENT 96682.02 T204 57 VENDOR TOTAL 96682.02 j RIV130 RIVERSIDE CNTY PURCHASING 101 151 701 000 21427 SUPPLIES 8.95 T204 58 RIV130 RIVERSIDE CNTY PURCHASING 101 151 701 000 26519 SUPPLIES 11.78 T204 59 RIV130 RIVERSIDE CNTY PURCHASING 101 201 701 000 10033993 SUPPLIES 88.35 T208 106 VENDOR TOTAL 109.08 RIV152 RIV COUNTY TRANSPORTATION 101 454 621 619 AR103021 SIGNAL MAINT 11418.00 T212 95 VENDOR TOTAL 11418.00 ROB200 SCOTT ROBERTSON 101 202 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 189.00 T208 107 I VENDOR TOTAL 189.00 ROT100 ROTO ROOTER 101 453 703 847 214144 PLUMBING REPAIRS 74.64 T208 108 ROT100 ROTO ROOTER 101 454 703 847 214144 PLUMBING REPAIRS 74.64 T208 109 VENDOR TOTAL 149.28 SAX100 SAXON ENGINEERING SERVICE 101 354 605 547 02-50 PLAN CHECK SVC 105.00 T204 62 SAX100 SAXON ENGINEERING SERVICE 101 354 605 547 02-49 PLAN CHECK SVC 70.00 T204 63 SAX100 SAXON ENGINEERING SERVICE 101 354 605 547 02-48 PLAN CHECK SVC 70.00 T204 64 SAX100 SAXON ENGINEERING SERVICE 101 354 605 547 02-47 PLAN CHECK SVC 280.00 T204 65 SAX100 i i SAXON ENGINEERING SERVICE 101 354 605 547 02-46 PLAN CHECK SVC 350.00 T204 66 C= ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 3:34PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 16 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. SAX100 SAXON ENGINEERING SERVICE 101 354 605 547 02-45 PLAN CHECK SVC 700.00 T204 67 VENDOR TOTAL 1575.00 SIN050 PAUL SINGER P E 101 452 603 000 0105.03 SPEED LIMIT STUDY 6320.00 T212 96 VENDOR TOTAL 6320.00 SKY200 SKYTEL 101 153 635 660 02B25409 PAGER SVC 16.48 T208 110 VENDOR TOTAL 16.48 5O0003 SOUND IMAGE 101 357 621 000 12468 SOUND SYS MAINT 529.07 T212 97 VENDOR TOTAL 529.07 SO0007 SOUTHWEST NETWORKS, INC 502 502 609 601 02-1103 COMPUTER SERVICE 660.00 T204 69 5O0007 SOUTHWEST NETWORKS, INC 502 502 609 601 02-1078 COMPUTER SERVICE 178.75 T204 70 SO0007 SOUTHWEST NETWORKS, INC 502 502 855 000 02-1114 WINDOWS 2000 SERVER LIC/ 9602.01 T208 ill SO0007 SOUTHWEST NETWORKS, INC 502 502 609 601 02-1127 COMPUTER SVC 1636.25 T208 112 VENDOR TOTAL 12077.01 STA045 STAN'S AUTO TECH 501 501 619 649 14146 VEHICLE REPAIRS 240.20 T204 71 STA045 STAN'S AUTO TECH 501 501 619 649 14153 VEHICLE REPAIRS 738.91 T204 72 STA045 STAN'S AUTO TECH 501 501 619 649 16209 VEHICLE REPAIRS 15.00 T204 73 VENDOR TOTAL 994.11 STA050 STAPLES 101 251 701 000 A7204500 SUPPLIES 315.30 T204 74 STA050 STAPLES 101 251 701 000 LC170800 SUPPLIES -26.03 T204 75 VENDOR TOTAL 289.27 SUN075 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY 101 000 203 219 17313 BUS PASSES SOLD 438.00 T208 114 VENDOR TOTAL 438.00 SUN080 SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP 501 501 619 646 17237 COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS 496.75 T208 113 VENDOR TOTAL 496.75 TERO10 TERRA -CAL CONST INC 401 639 609 553 CONSTRUCTION 122400.00 T212 99 N ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 3:34PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 17 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. VENDOR TOTAL 122400.00 TER100 TERRA NOVA PLANNING & 101 402 605 000 TN049923 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 16543.70 T212 98 VENDOR TOTAL 16543.70 TKDO10 T.K.D. ASSOCIATES INC 101 452 609 557 11291 PLAN CHECK SVC 318.55 T208 115 VENDOR TOTAL 318.55 TOPO10 TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 501 501 619 649 944947 SWEEPER TRUCK LIGHTS 206.88 T208 116 VENDOR TOTAL 206.88 TRI010 TRI LAKE CONSULTANTS INC 401 688 609 000 805 INSPECTION SVC 1012.50 T208 117 TRI010 TRI LAKE CONSULTANTS INC 401 688 609 500 805 INSPECTION SVC 1012.50 T208 118 TRI010 TRI LAKE CONSULTANTS INC 101 452 609 556 805 INSPECTION SVC 15462.50 T208 119 TRI010 TRI LAKE CONSULTANTS INC 401 656 609 000 805 INSPECTION SVC 675.00 T208 120 TRI010 TRI LAKE CONSULTANTS INC 401 712 609 000 805 INSPECTION SVC 4100.00 T208 121 VENDOR TOTAL 22262.50 TRU010 TRULY NOLEN INC 101 251 609 634 066-0030 PEST CONTROL 63.00 T204 48 VENDOR TOTAL 63.00 UNI001 UNITED CEREBARL PALSY 101 251 663 000 COMMUNITY SVC GRANT 1250.00 T208 122 VENDOR TOTAL 1250.00 USB050 U.S.BANK TRUST NATL ASSOC 710 000 267 000 CTS00098 ADMIN FEES AD88-1 362.50 T212 100 VENDOR TOTAL 362.50 USH100 USHERWOOD & ASSOC OF CAL 101 102 703 000 086914 COPIER SVC 31.96 T204 76 VENDOR TOTAL 31.96 VAN075 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOC INC 101 354 605 547 2652 PLAN CHECK SVC 1800.00 T212 101 VENDOR TOTAL 1800.00 VID050 VIDEO DEPOT 101 202 703 000 VIDEOS FOR EVENT 19.90 T208 123 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 3:34PM 02/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 18 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. VENDOR TOTAL 19.90 VONO10 VON'S C/O SAFEWAY INC 101 202 703 000 981498 SUPPLIES 17.25 T208 124 VENDOR TOTAL 17.25 WALO10 WAL MART COMMUNITY 101 253 661 000 595 EVENT SUPPLIES 110.80 T204 77 VENDOR TOTAL 110.80 WES020 WEST GROUP 101 201 651 000 80109696 LAND USE FORMS 152.65 T204 78 VENDOR TOTAL 152.65 WLC100 WLC ARCHITECTS INC 401 720 605 000 1 LA QUINTA FIRE STATION 12500.00 T208 125 VENDOR TOTAL 12500.00 WOO100 DEBBIE WOODRUFF 101 202 609 592 INSTRUCTOR 406.00 T208 126 VENDOR TOTAL 406.00 XER050 XESYSTEMS INC 502 502 598 000 164727 PRINTER/SCANNER MAINT 365.00 T204 79 VENDOR TOTAL 365.00 YOU100 YOUNG ENGINEERING SERVICE 101 354 605 547 02-008 PLAN CHECK SVC 3850.00 T204 80 VENDOR TOTAL 3850.00 TO -BE PAID - PAYMENT TOTAL 2324,037.17 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 10:57AM 02/08/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 48257 02/08/02 CIRO10 CIRO'S RESTORANTE 159.77 48258 02/08/02 COA080 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 501.24 48259 02/08/02 IMPO10 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 795.10 48260 02/08/02 SNO100 SNOW SUMMIT 896.00 48261 02/08/02 SOU010 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO 303.05 48262 02/08/02 SPRO10 SPRINT 715.45 48263 02/08/02 VER200 VERIZON 431.39 CHECK TOTAL 3,802.00 030 025 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 10:43AM 02/08/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 1 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. CIRO10 CIRO'S RESTORANTE 101 101 637 000 229396 COUNCIL MEETING 159.77 TEMG 13 VENDOR TOTAL 159.77 COA080 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 101 454 631 632 50720330 WATER SVC 211.06 TEMG 1 COA080 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 101 454 631 632 50720334 WATER SVC 257.86 TEMG 2 COA080 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 101 454 631 665 60613142 WATER SVC 32.32 TEMG 3 VENDOR TOTAL 501.24 IMPO10 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101 202 627 000 83391121 ELECTRIC SVC 795.10 TEMG 4 VENDOR TOTAL 795.10 SNO100 SNOW SUMMIT 101 253 703 000 SKI/SNOWBOARD EVENT COST 896.00 TEMG 5 VENDOR TOTAL 896.00 SOU010 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO 101 202 629 000 09422738 GAS SVC 303.05 TEMG 6 VENDOR TOTAL 303.05 SPRO10 SPRINT 101 153 635 000 84372158 PHONE SVC 657.02 TEMG 7 SPRO10 SPRINT 401 673 609 000 84372158 PHONE SVC 1.18 TEMG 8 SPRO10 SPRINT 101 153 635 000 18330139 PHONE SVC 57.25 TEMG 9 VENDOR TOTAL 715.45 VER200 VERIZON 101 153 635 000 5644738 PHONE SVC 29.08 TEMG 10 VER200 VERIZON 101 153 635 000 5640096 PHONE SVC 326.27 TEMG 11 VER200 VERIZON 101 153 635 000 5649188 PHONE SVC 76.04 TEMG 12 VENDOR TOTAL 431.39 TO -BE PAID - PAYMENT TOTAL 3,802.00 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 48250 02/06/02 &01634 FRANCIS PALMER 48251 02/06/02 GRA010 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO 48252 02/06/02 IMPO10 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 48253 02/06/02 JON040 KARYN JONES 48254 02/06/02 MCC400 MCCVB-HOUSING BUREAU 48255 02/06/02 RIV034 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CLERK 48256 02/06/02 VER200 VERIZON CHECK TOTAL 11:09AM 02/06/02 PAGE 1 PAYMENT AMOUNT 55.00 10950.00 12742.03 40.00 2032.80 64.00 63.98 25,947.81 0 4 (12 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 10:52AM 02/06/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 1 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. &01634 FRANCIS PALMER 101 000 437 000 14461 REFUND CLASS 55.00 TEMG 1 VENDOR TOTAL 55.00 GRA010 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO 401 688 609 553 225418/2 JEFFERSON ST IMP 3750.00 TEMG 2 GRA010 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO 401 688 610 500 225418/2 JEFFERSON ST IMP 7200.00 TEMG 3 VENDOR TOTAL 10950.00 IMP010 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101 453 627 000 VARIOUS ELECTRIC SVC 319.43 TEMG 4 IMP010 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101 454 627 619 VARIOUS ELECTRIC SVC 6988.16 TEMG 5 IMP010 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101 454 627 632 VARIOUS ELECTRIC SVC 2453.21 TEMG 6 IMP010 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101 454 627 663 VARIOUS ELECTRIC SVC 580.55 TEMG 7 IMP010 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101 454 627 664 VARIOUS ELECTRIC SVC 2289.95 TEMG 8 IMP010 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101 454 627 665 VARIOUS ELECTRIC SVC 97.52 TEMG 9 IMP010 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101 454 627 666 VARIOUS ELECTRIC SVC 13.21 TEMG 10 VENDOR TOTAL 12742.03 JON040 KARYN JONES 101 253 609 592 MATERIAL FEE 40.00 TEMG 11 VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 MCC400 MCCVB-HOUSING BUREAU 101 401 637 000 LCC PLANNERS INST CONF/H 2O32.80 TEMG 12 VENDOR TOTAL 2032.80 RIV034 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CLERK 406 905 692 000 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION 64.00 TEMG 13 VENDOR TOTAL 64.00 VER200 VERIZON 101 454 631 632 5642067 IRRIGATION MODEM 31.99 TEMG 14 VER200 VERIZON 101 454 631 632 7719026 IRRIGATION MODEM 31.99 TEMG 15 VENDOR TOTAL 63.98 TO -BE PAID - PAYMENT TOTAL 25,947.81 00 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 48245 02/04/02 CIR010 CIRO'S RESTORANTE 48246 02/04/02 IMPO10 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 48247 02/04/02 STA100 STATE WATER RESOURCES 48248 02/04/02 UNIO05 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 48249 02/04/02 VER200 VERIZON CHECK TOTAL 11:34AM 02/04/02 PAGE 1 PAYMENT AMOUNT 65.66 6695.36 500.00 20.00 3255.53 10,536.55 04 029 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 10:46AM 02/04/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 1 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. CIR010 CIRO'S RESTORANTE 101 104 637 000 IMP010 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101 357 627 000 STA100 STATE WATER RESOURCES 401 639 609 553 UNIO05 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 101 101 637 000 VER200 VERIZON 101 153 635 000 INTERVIEW PANEL LUNCH 65.66 TEMG VENDOR TOTAL 65.66 50014539 ELECTRICAL SVC 6695.36 TEMG VENDOR TOTAL 6695.36 NOTICE OF INTENT 500.00 TEMG VENDOR TOTAL 500.00 LUNCHEON 20.00 TEMG VENDOR TOTAL 20.00 5643127 PHONE SVC 3255.53 TEMG VENDOR TOTAL 3255.53 TO -BE PAID - PAYMENT TOTAL 10,536.55 1 2 3 4 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 09:43AM 02/01/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 48237 02/01/02 CAL040 CALIFORNIA VISION SERVICE 1053.11 48238 02/01/02 CAN050 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO 526.83 48239 02/01/02 MIT150 MICHAEL MITCHELL 50.00 48240 02/01/02 PRI050 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL 45704.36 48241 02/01/02 PUE050 MARIA L PUENTE 50.00 48242 02/01/02 SHA050 ARCHIE SHARP 50.00 48243 02/01/02 UNU050 UNUM LIFE INS 2026.84 48244 02/01/02 WRI050 ROBERT S WRIGHT 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 49,511.14 A Vr 031 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 09:31AM 02/01/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 1 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER 'DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. CAL040 CALIFORNIA VISION SERVICE 101 000 235 000 0101944A VISION INS 1053.11 TEMG 4 VENDOR TOTAL 1053.11 CAN050 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO 101 000 237 000 85637 LIFE INSURANCE/AD&D 526.83 TEMG 3 VENDOR TOTAL 526.83 MIT150 MICHAEL MITCHELL 101 401 509 000 JAN 2002 HISTORICAL PRESERVATION 50.00 TEMG 6 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 PR1050 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL 101 000 231 000 N31070-1 MEDICAL INS 41048.68 TEMG 1 PRIO50 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL 101 000 233 000 N31070-1 DENTAL INS 4655.68 TEMG 2 VENDOR TOTAL 45704.36 PUE050 MARIA L PUENTE 101 401 509 000 JAN 2002 HISTORICAL PRESERVATION 50.00 TEMG 7 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 SHAO50 ARCHIE SHARP 101 401 509 000 JAN 2002 HISTORICAL PRESERVATION 50.00 TEMG 9 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 UNUO50 UNUM LIFE INS 101 000 239 000 03896400 STD/LTD INS 2026.84 TEMG 5 VENDOR TOTAL 2026.84 WR1050 ROBERT S WRIGHT 101 401 509 000 JAN 2002 HISTORICAL PRESERVATION 50.00 TEMG 8 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 TO -BE PAID - PAYMENT TOTAL 49,511.14 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE — AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 10:20AM 01/31/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 48221 01/31/02 ABE001 JACQUES ABELS 150.00 48222 01/31/02 BOB100 BILL BOBBITT 50.00 48223 01/31/02 BUT010 RICHARD BUTLER 150.00 48224 01/31/02 DOU050 DOUBLETREE HOTEL 2323.20 48225 01/31/02 KIR010 TOM KIRK 150.00 48226 01/31/02 LAQ050 LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES 416.00 48227 01/31/02 LEA020 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES 2550.00 48228 01/31/02 OFF007 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 52.46 48229 01/31/02 RIV032 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CLERK 64.00 48230 01/31/02 RIV033 RIVERDISE COUNTY CLERK 64.00 48231 01/31/02 RIV040 RIVERSIDE CNTY DEPT CHILD 426.50 48232 01/31/02 ROB150 STEVE ROBBINS 150.00 48233 01/31/02 SOU002 SOUL OF CHINA 35.44 48234 01/31/02 TH0200 DAVID THOMS 50.00 48235 01/31/02 TYL050 ROBERT T TYLER 150.00 48236 01/31/02 UNIO05 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 164.00 CHECK TOTAL 6,945.60 l) 4 no 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 10:10AM 01/31/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 1 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. ABE001 JACQUES ABELS 101 401 509 000 JAN 2002 PLANNING COMM MTNG 150.00 TEMG 12 VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 BOB100 BILL BOBBITT 101 401 509 000 JAN 2002 ARCHITECT/LANDSCAPE DESI 50.00 TEMG 15 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 BUT010 RICHARD BUTLER 101 401 509 000 JAN 2002 PLANNING COMM MTNG 150.00 TEMG 11 VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 D00050 DOUBLETREE HOTEL 101 401 637 000 APA CONFERENCE 2323.20 TEMG 4 VENDOR TOTAL 2323.20 KIR010 TOM KIRK 101 401 509 000 JAN 2002 PLANNING COMM MTNG 150.00 TEMG 14 VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 LAQ050 LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES 101 000 223 000 P/R Distr.-L.Q.C.E.A. DU 416.00 T999 1 VENDOR TOTAL 416.00 LEA020 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES 101 401 637 000 CONF REGISTRATION 2550.00 TEMG 5 VENDOR TOTAL 2550.00 OFF007 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 101 151 701 000 SUPPLIES 52.46 TEMG 6 VENDOR TOTAL 52.46 RIV032 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CLERK 401 656 605 000 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION 64.00 TEMG 7 VENDOR TOTAL 64.00 RIV033 RIVERDIDE COUNTY CLERK 401 705 663 000 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION 64.00 TEMG 8 VENDOR TOTAL 64.00 RIV040 RIVERSIDE CNTY DEPT CHILD 101 000 221 000 P/R Distr.-GARNISH-RIV D 426.50 T999 2 VENDOR TOTAL 426.50 ROB150 STEVE ROBBINS 101 401 509 000 JAN 2002 PLANNING COMM MTNG 150.00 TEMG 13 W � ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 10:10AM 01/31/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 2 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAM NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 S00002 SOUL OF CHINA 101 104 637 000 INTERVIEW PANEL LUNCH 35.44 TEMG 9 VENDOR TOTAL 35.44 TH0200 DAVID THOMS 101 401 509 000 JAN 2002 ARCHITECT/LANDSCAPE DESI 50.00 TEMG 16 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 TYL050 ROBERT T TYLER 101 401 509 000 JAN 2002 PLANNING COMM MTNG 150.00 TEMG 10 VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 UNIO05 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 101 000 225 000 P/R Distr.-UNITED WAY 164.00 T999 3 VENDOR TOTAL 164.00 TO -BE PAID - PAYMENT TOTAL 6,945.60 •'mil CJ1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 10:32AM 01/30/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** PAYMENT AMOUNT 48199 01/30/02 ATT075 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 105.57 48200 01/30/02 BAX100 DAN BAXLEY 50.00 48201 01/30/02 BECO10 DEBORAH BECHARD 50.00 48202 01/30/02 BOU100 MICHELE BOUDREAU 50.00 48203 01/30/02 COA003 COACHELLA CHAMBER OF 13.00 48204 01/30/02 COA080 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 93.20 48205 01/30/02 CPR101 CPRS DISTRICT XI 30.00 48206 01/30/02 DAV010 MIKE DAVIS 50.00 48207 01/30/02 LAQ054 CITY OF LA QUINTA/HOUSING 50000.00 48208 01/30/02 LEW010 TOM LEWIS 50.00 48209 01/30/02 LOU100 ELSE LOUDON 50.00 48210 01/30/02 MAH100 CYRILLE P MAHFOUD 50.00 48211 01/30/02 MOU100 DONALD J MOULIN 50.00 48212 01/30/02 OLA100 MILTON OLANDER 50.00 48213 01/30/02 OSBO50 LEE M OSBORNE CPA 50.00 48214 01/30/02 REB050 JOAN REBICH 50.00 48215 01/30/02 REY050 ELAINE REYNOLDS 50.00 48216 01/30/02 SHA040 ROSITA SHAMIS 50.00 48217 01/30/02 SPRO10 SPRINT 772.25 48218 01/30/02 STJO10 VICTORIA ST JOHNS 50.00 48219 01/30/02 URB011 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE 1125.00 48220 01/30/02 VER200 VERIZON 198.38 CHECK TOTAL 53,037.40 C. 4 035 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 10:10AM 01/30/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 1 VENDOR ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. ATT075 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 101 153 635 660 27635754 WIRELESS PHONE 73.74 TEMG 1 ATT075 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 101 153 635 660 27635846 WIRELESS PHONE 31.83 TEMG 2 VENDOR TOTAL 105.57 BAX100 DAN BAXLEY 101 251 509 000 JAN 2002 CULTURAL ARTS COMM MTNG 50.00 TEMG 15 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 BECO10 DEBORAH BECHARD 101 251 509 000 JAN 2002 COMMUNITY SVC COMM MTNG 50.00 TEMG 24 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 BOU100 MICHELE BOUDREAU 101 251 509 000 JAN 2002 COMMUNITY SVC COMM MTNG 50.00 TEMG 25 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 COA003 COACHELLA CHAMBER OF 101 101 637 000 AWARDS DINNER 13.00 TEMG 5 VENDOR TOTAL 13.00 COA080 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 101 202 631 000 60706300 WATER SVC 13.00 TEMG 3 COA080 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 101 202 631 000 60706300 WATER SVC 80.20 TEMG 4 VENDOR TOTAL 93.20 CPR101 CPRS DISTRICT XI 101 251 637 000 PROPOSITION 40 MEETING 30.00 TEMG 6 VENDOR TOTAL 30.00 DAV010 MIKE DAVIS 101 251 509 000 JAN 2002 COMMUNITY SVC COMM MTNG 50.00 TEMG 26 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 LAQ054 CITY OF LA QUINTA/HOUSING 245 000 101 170 TRANSFER FUNDS/OPERATING 50000.00 TEMG 7 VENDOR TOTAL 50000.00 LEW010 TOM LEWIS 101 151 509 000 JAN 2002 INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOAR 50.00 TEMG 21 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 LOU100 ELSE LOUDON 101 251 509 000 JAN 2002 CULTURAL ARTS COMM MTNG 50.00 TEMG 16 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 CITY OF LA QUINTA VENDOR MAH100 CYRILLE P MAHFOUD MOU100 DONALD J MOULIN OLA100 MILTON OLANDER OSB050 LEE M OSBORNE CPA REB050 JOAN REBICH REY050 ELAINE REYNOLDS SHA040 ROSITA SHAMIS SPRO10 SPRINT SPRO10 SPRINT SPRO10 SPRINT STJO10 VICTORIA ST JOHNS URBO11 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE VER200 VERIZON 00 u'1 TO -BE PAID INVOICES 10:10AM O1/30/02 FOR BANK ID - DEF PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE PAYMENT BATCH TRAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NO. VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 101 151 509 000 JAN 2002 INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOAR 50.00 TEMG 23 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 101 151 509 000 JAN 2002 INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOAR 50.00 TEMG 20 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 101 151 509 000 JAN 2002 INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOAR 50.00 TEMG 19 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 101 151 509 000 JAN 2002 INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOAR 50.00 TEMG 22 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 101 251 509 000 JAN 2002 COMMUNITY SVC COMM MTNG 50.00 TEMG 27 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 101 251 509 000 JAN 2002 CULTURAL ARTS COMM MTNG 50.00 TEMG 17 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 101 251 509 000 JAN 2002 CULTURAL ARTS COMM MTNG 50.00 TEMG 18 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 101 153 635 660 45281987 PHONE SVC 22.54 TEMG 8 401 673 609 553 84372158 PHONE SVC 18.70 TEMG 9 101 153 635 660 84372158 PHONE SVC 731.01 TEMG 10 VENDOR TOTAL 772.25 101 251 509 000 JAN 2002 COMMUNITY SVC COMM MTNG 50.00 TEMG 28 VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 405 902 637 000 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 1125.00 TEMG 11 VENDOR TOTAL 1125.00 101 153 635 000 7759664 PHONE SVC 47.61 TEMG 12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5003 CITY OF LA QUINTA VENDOR VER200 VERIZON VER200 VERIZON TO -BE PAID INVOICES FOR BANK ID - DEF ACCOUNT NUMBER INV. INVOICE NUMBER DESCRIPTION 101 153 635 000 5649191 PHONE SVC 401 673 609 553 7778691 PHONE SVC VENDOR TOTAL 198.38 10:10AM O1/30/02 PAGE 3 PAYMENT BATCH TRAN AMOUNT NO. 76.04 TEMG 13 74.73 TEMG 14 TO -BE PAID - PAYMENT TOTAL 53,037.40 A/P - AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED 3:50PM 01/31/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK BK INVOICE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER ID DATE AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME 46933 DEF 09/27/01 46933 DEF 09/20/01 TOTAL VOIDED 181.78 ARC100 ARCH 511.03 ARC100 ARCH 692.81 INVOICE DESCRIPTION PAGER SVC PAGER SVC 040 A/P - AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED 1:20PM 01/30/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK BK INVOICE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER ID DATE AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME 48034 DEF 01/10/02 2753.46 DOU050 DOUBLETREE HOTEL TOTAL VOIDED 2,753.46 INVOICE DESCRIPTION HOTEL/LCC PLANNERS INST 041 A/P - AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED 3:18PM O1/31/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK BK INVOICE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER ID DATE AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME 46540 DEF 08/23/01 25.00 DUN100 DUNCAN PRINTING 46540 DEF 08/23/01 25.00 DUN100 DUNCAN PRINTING TOTAL VOIDED 50.00 INVOICE DESCRIPTION HOLIDAY SIGNS HOLIDAY SIGNS 042 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Transmittal of Treasurer's Report PUBLIC HEARING: as of December 31, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Transmittal of Treasurer's Report dated December 31, 2001 for the City of La Quinta. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with California Government Code Section 53645 as amended 1 /1 /86; and is in conformity with City Code 3.08.010 to 3.08.070 Investment of Money and Funds. I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet next month's estimated expenditures. espect Ily submitted, hn M. Falconer, Finance Director Approved for Submission by: "0 Z-� Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: Treasurer's Report, City of La Quinta T a 0 it!t 4 4 a" MEMORANDUM TO: La Quinta City Council FROM: John M. Falconer, Finance Director/Treasurer SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report for December 31, 2001 DATE: January 30, 2002 Attached is the Treasurer's Report -for the month ending December 31, 2001. The report is submitted to the City Council each month after a reconciliation of accounts is accomplished by the Finance Dept. The following table summarizes the changes in investment types for the month: Investment Beginning Purchased Notes Sold/Matured Other Ending Change Cash $422,375 $410,959 (1) $833,334 $410,959 LAIF $17,693,521 (1,400,000) 16,293,521 (1,400,000) US Treasuries (2) $56,312,357 (110,805) 56,201,552 (110,805) US Gov't Agencies (2) $15,927,272 3,053,190 (5,956,682) (25,314) 12,998,466 (2,928,806) Commercial Paper (2) $1,995,693 2,994,674 7,743 4,998,110 3,002,417 Mutual Funds $9,107,570 108,473 1 9,216,043 108,473 Total 101 458 788 $6 567 296 $7 356 682 $128 376 $100 541 026 917 762 I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code; and is in conformity with the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the pools expenditure requirements for the next six months. the City of La Quinta used the Bureau of the Public Debt, U.S. Bank Monthly Statement and the Bank of New York Monthly Custodian Report to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. // _3C) LO Dat Director/Treasurer Footnote (1) The amount reported represents the net increase (decrease) of deposits and withdrawals from the previous month. (2) The amount reported in the other column represents the amortization of premium/discount for the month on US Treasury, Commercial Paper and Agency investments. r 063 CITY OF LA QUINTA AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS AND DIVERSIFICATION December 31, 2001 The City Treasurer will be permitted to invest in the following types of investments subject to the maximum percentage compliance limits and bid process requirements: All maturities must be less than the maximum allowed. Type of Investments CheckingiSavings and other time accounts Certificate of Deposits. with interest earnings paid monthly. U.S. Treasury Bills, Strips, Notes and Bonds. U.S. Government Securities and Federal Government Securities ( except any collateralized mortgage obligation (CMO) or structured note which contains embedded rate options): - Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) - Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) - Federal Home Loan Bank Notes S Bonds (FHLB) - Student Loan Marketing Association (SLMA) - Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB) - Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) Prime Commercial Paper Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Money market mutual funds regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and whose portfolio consists only of US Agency Securities maintaining a par value per share of $1. Investment Agreements for bond proceeds and/or reserve funds. Total All Funds All Funds Maximum Actual % All Funds Over Under 85% 0.83%-84.170/1 60% 0.00%-60.00% 100% 55.90%-44.10% 100% $5 million $3 million $3 million $3 million $5 million 12.93% $0 $5,000,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $5,000,000 rda 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 30% 4.97% -25.03% 20% 16.21 % -3.796/6 60% 9.17% -50.831%. WA 0.00% N/A 100.00% Annualized Earnings of Pooled Cash Investments 2.83% Annualized Earnings of Fiscal Agent Investments 1.40% Annualized Earnings of All Investments 2.34% Sic Month Treasury Bill Rate 1.85% Surplus Surplus Maximum % Surplus Over Under 85% 0.04%-84.96% 60% 0.00%-60.00% 100% 56.34%-43.66% 100% $5 million $3 million $3 million $3 million $5 million 13.03% $5,000.000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $5,000,000 n/a 30% 5.01% -24.99% 20% 16.33% -3.67% 20% 9.24% -10.76% N/A 0.00% N/A 99.99% Maximum Restrictions Maturity Credit Quality ]Exceptions <=$99,000 r institution 2years FDIC Insured None <=$99,000 per institution 2 ars FDIC Insured None 2 years None Restricted to per -issuer limits below: 100% $5 million $3 million $3 million $3 million $5 million 2 years None 15% Addition 15% WAM <=31 $2,000 000Der Issuer 90 days Standard & Poors/Moodys A-1 P-1 None E30 000,000 per account' Utilize DVP 2 years Unrated one Maintain $1 per share par value. Utilize DVP 90 days AAA by two of three rating agencies or assets of $500 million and investor SEC licensed > 5 yrs None None City of La Ouinta Summary of Holdings City, Redevelopment Agency and Financing Authority 12/31/2001 City Cash & Investments Bank Accounts Interest Accrued Unrealized Market Name - Availability Surplus Type Rank Rate Book Interest Gain Loss Value Bank Wells Fargo - Demand Yes Checking/Gov't Mutual Funds 1 0.8951% $792,745 N/A N/A $792,745 $364,729 Petty Cash - Demand No WA 1 0 1.000 N/A N/A 1,000 1,000 Wells Fa /Housi - Demand Yes Checking 1 0 39,589 N/A N/A 39,589 48,062 Total - Bank Accounts $833,334 $833,334 $413,791 U. S. Government Securities Yield Amortized Accrued Unrealized Market Days Par Settlement Maturity Original Days Yield to Market Value Custodian - Availability Surplus Issuer/Type Rank Price Value Interest Gain Loss Value to maturity Value Date Date to Maturity Maturity Source Bank of New York - Demand Yes Fed Nall. Mortg Assoc. - Discount 1 1.9200% 4,959,733 0 4,267 4,964,000 151 5,000,000 11/16/2001 05/31/2002 196 1.9659% Bank of New York Bank of New York - Demand Yes Federal Home Loan Mortg - Disc 1 2.0100% 4,989,603 15,157 1,897 4,976.343 38 5,000,000 11/07/2001 02/07/2002 92 2.0075% Bank of New York Bank of New York - Demand Yes Federal Home Loan Banks Deb. 1 6.7500% 3,049,130 33,750 30,558 3,045,938 121 3,000,000 12/21/2001 05/01/2002 131 1.7916% Bank of New York 1 I Oial - U.J. ISOVemmenr SecumleS 1 I I I .114WUAW I 3,46,8Ur I 436,rZZ 131Z.VWX51 I I 1r13,uUU uu 1 I I I I I U. S. Treasury Notes Custodian - Availability Surplus issuer/Type Rank Yield Price Amortized Value Accrued Interest Unrealized Gain Loss Market Value Days to maturity Par Value Settlement Date Maturity Date Original Days to maturity Yield to Maturity Market Value Source Bank of New York - Demand Yes U.S. Treasury Note 1 1.8300% 8,973,008 15,217 (13,155) 8,959.853 59 9,000,000 11/30/2001 02/28/2002 90 1.8639% Bank of New York Bank of New York - Demand Yes U.S. Treasury Note 1 6.6250% 1,981,301 33,514 44,083 2,003,512 90 1,980,000 04/24/2000 03/31/2002 706 6.3340% Bank of New York Bank of New York - Demand Yes U.S. Treasury Note 1 6.3750% 3,999,506 106,712 15.494 4,015.000 31 4.000,000 06/22/2000 01/31/2002 588 6.5252% Bank of New York Bank of New York - Demand Yes U.S. Treasury Note 1 2.0100% 4,993,300 17,383 (16,233) 4,977,067 24 5,000,000 10/3l/2001 01/24/2002 85 2.0476% Bank of New York Total - U.S. Treasury 19 947 115 172 828 30 189 19 955 432 $19,980,000 Prime Commercial Paper Custodian - Availability Surplus issuerrrype Rank Yield Price Amortized Value Accrued Interest Unrealized Gain Loss Market Value Days to Maturity Par Value Settlement Date Maturity Date Original Days to Maturity Yield to Maturity Market Value Source Bank of New York - Demand Yes Morgan Stanley Dean Witter CP 1 2.0400% 1,999,206 3,661 (156) 1,995,389 7 2,000,000 11/30/2001 01/07/2002 38 2.0444% Banc of New York Banc of New York - Demand Yes Salomon Smith Barney CP Disc. 1 1.8700% $1,999,273 $2,909 0 $1,996,141 7 $2,000,000 12/04/2001 01/07/2002 34 1.8733% Bank of New York Bank of New York - Demand Yes General Electric Capital Corp. Disc 1 1.9000% $999,631 $1,478 14 $998.167 7 $1.000,000 12/04/2001 01/07/2002 34 1.9034% Bank of New York Total - U.S. Government Securities $4,998,110 $8,048 142 989 697 $5,000,000 Local Agency Investment Fund Interest I Accrued I Unrealizable Market Days to Actual Management I Statutory Management Name - Availability Surplus Type Rank Rate Book Interest Gain/(Loss Value Maturity Fees Charoed Fees Allowed LAIF - City - Demand Yes State Pool N/A 3.2610% $10.125,930 WA WA WA 1 .21 of 1% - Otr ending 09/30/01 .50 of 1% LAIF - RDA - Demand Yes State Pool WA 1 3.2610% 6 167 591 WA WA WA 1 .21 of 1% - Otr ending 09/30/01 .50 of 1% Total - State Pool $16,293,521 so 0 Total City Investments Total City Cash & Investments Fiscal A ent Investments 54 237 212 229 781 68 769 1 WA 55 070 548 229 781 da 769 1 NIA Portfolio - RDA Investments Custodian - Availability surplus issuer/Type Rank Interest Rate Amortized Value Accrued Interest Unrealized Gain Loss Market Value Days to Maturity Par Value Settlement Date Maturity Date Original Days Yield to to Maturttv Mat Market Value Source 2001 RDA U.S. Bank-CIP Yes U.S.Treasury Note 1 6.2500% 1 36.254,437 $1.870.715 133,688 36,388,125 59 36,000,000 11/30/2001 02/28/2002 90 1.8842% U.S.Bank I Total - U.S. Treasury 1 I 1 $36,254,431 1 S1,1370,715 1 $133,6BB 1 $36,38B.1Z5 1 I S36,uou.0Uu 1 I I 1 Portfolio - Money Mrkt Mutual Funds Trustee - Availability Surplus Money Market Mutual Fund Rank Yield Price Book Accrued Interest Unrealizable Gain✓ Loss Market Value Days to Maturity Bond Issue Management Fees Civic Center U.S.Bank - Project Yes 1st American 1 1.4000% $549,535 N/A $0 $549,535 1 1996 City Hall Revenue Bonds .40% of Average Daily Civic Center U.S.Bank - Debt Svc Yes 1st American 1 1.4000% 1,926 N/A 0 1.926 1 1996 City Hall Revenue Bonds 1994 RDA U.S. Bank -Debt Svc Yes 1st American 1 1.4000% 3,394 N/A 0 3.394 1 1994 Series Bonds -RDA 1 1995 RDA U.S.Bank - CIP Yes 1st American 1 1.4000% 4,044,578 N/A 0 4.044,578 1 1995 Housing Bonds - RDA 1 & 2 1995 RDA U.S. Bank-Dbt Svc Yes 1st American 1 1.4000% 3,563 N/A 0 3,563 1 1995 Housing Bonds - RDA 1 & 2 1998 RDA U.S.Bank - Dbt Svc Yes 1st American 1 1.4000% 53,751 WA 0 53,751 1 1998 Series Bonds - RDA 1 1998 RDA U.S.Bank - CIP Yes 1st American 1 1.4000% 3,567,176 N/A 0 3,567,176 1 1998 Series Bonds - RDA 1 1998 RDA U.S.Bank - Dbt Svc Yes 1st American 1 1,4000% 1,922 WA 0 1,922 1 1998 Series Bonds - RDA 2 1998 RDA U.S.Bank - CIP Yes 1st American 1 1.4000% 961 WA 0 961 1 1998 Series Bonds - RDA 2 2001 RDA U.S. Bank - Dbt Svc Yes 1st American 1 1.4000% 142,677 N/A 0 142,677 1 2001 RDA U.S. Bank - Dbt Svc 2001 RDA U.S. Bank - CIP Yes 1st American I 1 1.4000% 846,560 N/A 0 1148 580 1 2001 RDA U.S. Banc - CIP Subtotal - Mutual Fund 9 218 043 0 0 9 218 043 Total Fiscal Agent Investments Grand Total Average Maturity V � 45 470 480 1 870 715 133 688 604168 100 541 028 2 100 498 200 457 1 N A 44 Days City of La Quinta Summary of Investment Activities City, Redevelopment Agency and Financing Authority December 31, 2001 Investments Purchased Yield Name Type Principal Date to Maturity Par Checking & Savings - Net Change Checking & Savings 410,959 N/A LAIF - CITY - Net Change State Pool LAIF - RDA - Net Change State Pool Prime Commercial Paper Salomon Smith Barney CP Disc. 1,996,468 12/04/2001 1.873% 2,000,000 Prime Commercial Paper General Electric Capital Corp Disc 998,206 12/04/2001 1.903% 1,000,000 U.S. Treasury Notes/Bills U.S. Government Securities Federal Home Loan Banks Deb. 3,053,190 12/21/2001 1.792% 3,000,000 Mutual Funds - Net Change 108,473 various N/A Total Investments Purchased $6,567,296 Investments Sold/Matured Yield Name Type Principal Date to Maturity Par Checking & Savings - Net Change Checking & Savings LAIF - CITY - Net Change State Pool 1,400,000 N/A LAIF - RDA - Net Change State Pool U.S. Government Securities Farm Credit Bank - Discount 2,973,954 12/04/2001 3.365% 3,000,000 U.S. Government Securities Federal Home Loan Bank - Disc. 2,982,728 12/21/2001 2.458% 3,000,000 Mutual Funds - Net Change U.S. Treasury Mutual Funds Total Investments Sold/Matured $7,356,682 Unamortized Premium/Discount T $128,376 11 $101,458,788 6,567,296 (7,356,682) 128,376 $100, 541, 026 Summary of Investment Activities City, Redevelopment Agency and Financing Authority December 31, 2001 Investments Purchased Name Checking & Savings - Net Change LAIF - CITY - Net Change Type Checking & Savings State Pool Principal 410,959 Date Yield to Maturity Par N/A LAIF - RDA - Net Change State Pool Prime Commercial Paper Prime Commercial Paper U.S. Treasury Notes/Bills Salomon Smith Barney CP Disc. General Electric Capital Corp Disc 1,996,468 998,206 12/04/2001 12/04/2001 1.873% 1.903% 2,000,000 1,000,000 U.S. Government Securities Mutual Funds - Net Change Total Investments Purchased Federal Home Loan Banks Deb. 3,053,190 108,473 $6,5679296 12/21/2001 various 1.792% 3,000,000 N/A Investments Sold/Matured Yield Name Type Principal Date to Maturity Par Checking & Savings - Net Change Checking & Savings LAIF - CITY - Net Change State Pool 1,400,000 N/A LAIF - RDA - Net Change State Pool U.S. Government Securities Farm Credit Bank - Discount 2,973,954 12/04/2001 3.365% 3,000,000 U.S. Government Securities Federal Home Loan Bank - Disc. 2,982,728 12/21/2001 2.458% 3,000,000 Mutual Funds - Net Change U.S. Treasury Mutual Funds Total Investments Sold/Matured $793569682 Unamortized Premium/Discount 1 $128,376 101,458,788 6,567,296 (7,356,682) 128,376 1100,541,026 10 City of La Quinta Distribution of Cash & Investments & Balances December 31, 2001 Distribution of Cash & Investments Icity Totals 25,070,410 General Fund Gas Tax Fund 378,533 Quimby Fund Infrastructure Fund 541,439 4,002,547 Village Parking Fund Special Revenue Interest Fund 0 8,472,318 12,614 Capital Project Fund AD 2000-1 Construction Fund 124,870 461,232 AD 97-1 Construction Fund 0 Equipment Replacement Fund Information Technology Fund Landscape & Lighting Fund Trust & Agency Funds 2,391,685 884,682 (246,781) 2,331,654 Subtotal $44,425,203 Redevelopment Agency Totals Project Area 1 Project Area 2 Capital Improvement Funds Debt Service Funds 42,790,535 2,109,739 2,314,396 543,167 Low & Moderate Income Funds 1,551,845 6,156,478 Subtotal 46,452,119 9,014,041 $55,466,160 Financing Authority Totals Project Funds 645,610 Debt Service Funds 4,053 Subtotal $649,663 Total $100,541,026 Cash Balances Type July 01 August September October November December January February March April May June Cash & Investments $621,168 $11,449,801 $3,302,949 $1,943,453 $422,375 $833,334 State Pool 12,627,030 15,027,030 $20,027,030 $20,193,521 $17,693,521 $16,293,521 U.S. Treasury Bills/Notes 27,441,733 51,995,326 $51,927,792 $52,834,278 $56,312,357 $56,201.552 U.S. Government Securities 15,134,293 12,936,265 $15,931,595 $15,971,550 $15,927,272 $12,998,466 Prime Commercial Paper 5,984,628 0 $0 $0 $1,995,693 $4,998,110 Mutual Funds 10,288,205 22,008,907 1 $10,963,902 $10,999,334 $9,107,570 1 $9,216,043 Total 72 097 057 113 417 329 102 153 268 101 942 136 101 458 788 100 541 026 0 1 M_ 0 0 0 so Type July 00 Au ust September October November December January February March April May June Cash & Investments $623,148 $275,885 $107,829 $924,562 $914,561 ($262,127) $10,718,421 $1,450,825 $837,401 $1,842,622 $766,550 $3,322,653 State Pool (=) 7,045,921 4,845,922 4,645.922 5.505,574 5,455,574 6,555,574 3,746.551 8,746,551 8,746,551 8,859,754 8,859,754 8,859,754 U.S. Treasu—Jwlls/Notes 31,438,391 31,452,281 32,865,550 31,940,560 31,942,221 31,953,489 31,368,928 31,371,801 36,373,520 28,960,566 29,876,215 29,909,156 U.S. Govern t Securities 19,172,508 19,030,363 17,591,486 17,648,821 17,614,309 17,761,645 17,818,981 17,870,769 12,881,355 12,929,508 15,122,362 15,110,040 Prime Commercial Paper 3,995,487 2,995,465 1,493,002 1,989,233 1,987,069 1,998,522 4,984,778 4,948.666 4,986,219 3,493,054 10,473,134 5,984,538 Mutual Funds 1 4,025,473 6,214,614 3,130,638 4,174,707 4,241.204 4,251,184 3,067,025 4,924,958 2,956,693 10,624,606 10,552,621 10,258,353 Total 66 300 928 64 814 530 59 834 427 62183 457 2154 939 62 258 287 71 704 684 69 313 570 66 781 739 66 710 110 75 650 636 73 444 494 City of La Quinta Cash Flow Analysis Fv ntin� Actual Forecasted Forecasted Forecasted Forecasted Forecasted Forecasted Total Beginning Cash Balance 7/01 -12101 1/2002 2/2002 3/2002 4/2002 5/2002 6/2002 73,532,910 100,541,026 106,579,057 102,836 112 101,177.193 101 006,863 107 779 702 73,532.910 Property Tax/ Tax Increment Transient Occupancy Tax 748,859 708,694 50,527 50,527 69,527 727,694 106,527 2,462,353 Sales Tax 885,546 359,500 269.625 359,500 539,250 629,125 359,500 3,402,046 Other revenues 1,488,822 241.313 321,750 321,750 321,750 321,750 321,750 3,338,884 Revenues 58,641,275 13,414,145 4,291,392 2,738,635 2,757,454 13.375.141 4,111,788 99,329.829 61,764,502 14,723 652 4,933,293 3,470 411 3.687.981 15,053 710 4 899 564 108,533 113 Expenditures Salaries 8 Fringe Benefits Redevelopment Agency 2,243,815 384,615 384,615 384,615 384,615 576,923 384.615 4,743,815 Other expenditures 4,893,859 3,990,728 913,803 983,294 913,098 963,428 913,098 1,836,809 913,098 808,827 913,098 1.022,824 903,779 2,314,629 10.363,834 11.920,538 Capital Projects Debt Service Princi al/lnterest/Pass Through) 6,202,022 1,646,194 1.635,267 1,794,313 1.751,771 1,352,427 1,638,613 16.020,607 Total Expenditures 14,507,284 31,837,708 4,757.715 8,685,621 4.779,829 8,676,238 200,495 5,129,330 0 3,858,311 4,415.599 8,280 871 342,117 5,583.753 29,003,038 72,051.833 Net Revenues/Expenditures 29,926,794 6,038 030 3,742,944 0 65 (1,658,9 170,330 6,772,839 684,189 36,481,281 Changes in Assets/Liabilides (2,918,678) (2,918,678) JEnding Cash Balance 100,541,026 106,579.057 102,836,112 1 10-1,177,193 1 101,006,863 1 107.779,702 4 107,095,513 107 095,513 Net Change in Cash before Maturing Investments 27,008,116 6,038, 030 1 (3,742.9"1 1 J1,658,91911170,330) 6,772, 839 684189 1 33,562,603 Projected (Sources)/Uses of Cash - City Pooled LAiF Maturing Investments - Pooled Cash Total 248,766 I 1,458,919 I (29,670) I (6,972,839) 484,169 4.000,000) (1,980.000) 0 (13,000,000) 1 0 Bond Money Market Maturing Investments 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Debt Service Money Market 0 0 (36,000,000) 3,294,178 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 200,000 32,505,822 200,000 200,000 0 200,000 0 200,000 Net Change in Cash after Maturing Investments 20 038 030 46 257 056 (321,081) 170,330 19 772 839 684,189 Projected Liquid Cash Balances if no investments made W Balance Bond Capital Project Money Market Market bt Service MoneyO 16,293,521 9,008,810 207,233 36,531,551 8,808,810 207.233 50,282.785 44,608,810 (3.086.9451 50,803,866 44,408,810 (3 RA QAs1 50,833,536 44,208,810 in nna QA�i 70,806,375 44,008,810 /Q naa OAK% 70,322,186 43n02,808,810 1 I%AG\ Major Changes in Cash Flow Analysis from Prior Report Revenues - No changes to report this month Expenditures - No changes to report this month City of La Quinta Reconciliation of Actual and Surpks Funds City, Redevelopment Agency and Financing Authority December 31, 2001 Balance of Actuals Less Non -Surplus Funds (793.745) Balance of Surplus Funds $99,747,281 Bank Accounts Nine - Aymbbilky Surpkis Type Book Wells Fargo - Demand No Chedcirq $792,745 Wells Fargo - Demand Yes Checking 0 Petty Cash - Demand No WA 1,000 Wells F - Demand Yes Checking 39 589 Total - Bank Accounts 833 334 Treasury Custodian - Availability Surplus IssuartType Onginial Book Value Banc of New York - Demand Yes U.S. Treasury Note 8,973.008 Banc of New York - Demand Yes U.S. Treasury Note 1,981.301 Bank of New York - Demand Yes U.S. Treasury Nob 3.999,506 Bank of New York - Demand Yes U.S. Treasury Note 4,993,300 Total - U.S. Treasury 19 947 115 Government Securkies Custodian - Availability S Issuer/Type Original Book Value Bank of New York - Demand Yes Fed Nad. Mortg Assoc. - Diswu t $4,959,733 Bank of New York - Demand Yes Federal Home Loan Mortg - Disc $4,909,603 Banc of New York - Demand Yes Federal Home Loan Banks Deb. $3,049,130 Banc of New York - Demand Yes $0 $0 Total - U.S. Treasury $12,996,466 Surplus --Surpkis Surplus ; w AN Funds Surplus Yes AOI Yes No Adj No A&AW % Yes 0 so 792,745 792,745 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1'000 1,000 39 589 39,589 0 0 09.589 1 so 439,589 $793,745 L so 793 , 745 0.8288% 0.0397% Swpkj$ Surplus Yes Adj Yes 8,973,008 8.973,006 1,981,301 1.981,301 3,999.506 3.999,506 4,993,300 4,993,300 19 47,115 0 $119,947,11115 Surplus No Ad No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 so so so AN Funds Stapius Actual % Yes 19,8398% 19.9977% Surpluis Surplus Surplius AN Swpkn FundsSurplus Yes Ad' Yes No No Actual % Yes $4.959,733 $4.959,733 $0 0 0 $4,989,803 $4,989,603 $0 0 $0 3.049,130 $3,049.130 0 0 0 0 $0 0 0 0 12 998 466 $12.M,466 0 12.9285% 1360314% Prime Commercial Paper Custodian - Ava S Issrer/T Ong Vake Yes Ad Yes Surplus No Ad Surplusurplus No AN Funds S Actual % Yes Bank of New York - Demand Yes Morgan Stank Dean Witter CP ill 999 $1.999 206 ill 999 08 Total - U.S. Government Securities 998 110 998110 0 998 110 0 4.9712% 5.0108% FundsLocal Surplus Inve Fund Surplus Yes Ad' Sur" Yes OEM Adud % Yes 510.125,930 $10.125,930 8167 591 6 167 591 18 293 521 0 18 3 521 16.2058% 16.3348% gerrcy stment Name - Ava S T LAIF - City -Demand Yes State Pool $ L.Ait= -RDA -Demand Yes State Pool ;2d Total -State P Total City kwastments Total City Cash 6 Invesbnents I Fiscal Agent krvesbmMft Portfoliocity inve stments Custodian - Avaia S Issuerfrype n9 Value 2001 RDA U.S. Bank-CIP Yes U.S.Tre Nob I 36,254 437 Total - U.S. Tre 36 54 437 Portfolio - Mutual Funds Trustee - Availability Surplus Money Market Mutual Fund Book Civic Center U.S.Bank - Project Yes 1 st American $549,535 Civic Center U.S.Bank - Debt Svc Yes 1st American 1,926 1994 RDA U.S. Banc -Debt Svc Yes 1st American 3.394 1995 RDA U.S.Bank - CIP Yes 1st American 4,044,578 1995 RDA U.S. Banc-Dbt Svc Yes 1st American 3,563 1998 RDA U.S.Bank - Dbt Svc Yes 1 st American 53,751 1998 RDA U.S.Bank - CIP Yes 1st American 3.567,176 1998 RDA U.S.Bank - Dbt Svc Yes 1st American 1,922 1998 RDA U.S.Bank - CIP Yes 1st American 961 2001 RDA U.S. Bank - Dbt Svc Yes 1 st American 142,677 2001 RDA U.S. Banc - CIP Yes 1st American 848 560 Subtotal - Mutual Fund 9 6,043 Ad' Yes M54 36 437 th C118 254 437 urpks Yes Ad' Surpkz Yes $549,535 $549.535 1.926 1,926 3.394 3,394 4,044,578 4,044,578 3,563 3,563 53,751 53,751 3,567,176 3,567.176 1,922 1,922 961 961 142,677 142,677 646 580 846,560 9216043 0 9216043 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 E'�.lfy�'x�'--'� E'-FjR;Yblt:�'-'>•Ei'E:fi�x�r'>■ �L����i'� & A LI'm AN Funds surplus AcbjW % Yes 8.0593% 36.3463% FundsAN Surplus Actual % Yes 9.1885% 9.2394% CITY OF LA QUINTA BALANCE SHEET 12/31/01 ASSETS: POOLED CASH LQRP INVESTMENT IN POOLED CASH INVESTMENT T-BILL/NOTES & OTHER AUTO MALL CASH LQRP CASH BOND REDEMPTION CASH BOND RESERVE CASH BOND PROJECT CASH BOND ESCROW CASH PETTY CASH CASH & INVESTMENT TOTAL INVESTMENT IN LAND HELD FOR RESALE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE PREMIUM/DISCOUNT ON INVESTMENT LQRP-ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE INTEREST RECEIVABLE LOAN/NOTES RECEIVABLE DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES - CVAG CVAG ALLOWANCE DUE FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTS DUE FROM OTHER FUNDS DUE FROM RDA INTEREST ADVANCE -DUE FROM RDA ADVANCES TO OTHER FUNDS NSF CHECKS RECEIVABLE ACCRUED REVENUE FIXED ASSETS ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION TRAVELADVANCES EMPLOYEE ADVANCES PREPAID EXPENSES RECEIVABLE TOTAL WORKER COMPENSATION DEPOSIT RENT DEPOSITS CITY CITY FIXED LONG TERM CITY ASSETS DEBT RDA 6,178,212.92 10,024,852.82 785,000.00 37,980,000.00 39,588.72 205,309.22 44,411,408.38 1,000.00 44,159,212.92 55,466,159.14 39,499.74 60,900.00 11.554.33 254,437.00 41,461.30 28,125.00 565,607.73 13,489,603.69 259,634.01 2,299,096.69 (2,299,096.69) 0.37 1,040,973.94 651,038.04 8,497,550.20 3,455,159.88 56,483.22 3,522.26 833.40 20,711,742.00 711,534.48 2,294.00 14,106,331.43 20,711,742.00 15,063,881.16 RDA RDA FA FIXED LONG TERM FINANCING LONG TERM GRAND ASSETS DEBT AUTHORITY DEBT TOTAL 98,200.72 16,301,266.46 785,000.00 37,980,000.00 39.588, 72 1,926.55 207,235, 77 549,535.59 44,960,943.97 1,000, 00 649,662.86 100,275,034 92 100,399.74 265,991.33 41,461.30 593.732.73 13.489.603.69 259,634.01 2,299,096.69 (2,299,096.69) 0.37 1,692,011.98 8,497,550.20 3.455.159.88 56.483.22 3,522.26 833,40 20,711,742.00 711,534,48 2,29400 49,881,954.59 UTILITY DEPOSITS 75.00 75.00 MISC. DEPOSITS 2,100.00 2,100.00 DEPOSITS TOTAL 2,175.00 2,175.00 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS 9,988,279.05 9,988,279.05 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AMOUNT AVAILABLE TO RETIRE L/T DEBT 3,395,117.03 3,395,117.03 AMOUNT TO BE PROVIDED FOR LIT DEBT 951,847.65 80,866,860.97 7,750,000.00 89,568,708.62 TOTAL OTHER ASSETS 951,847.65 9,988,279.05 84,261,978.00 7,750,000.00 102,952,104.70 TOTAL ASSETS 58,267,719 35 20,711,742 00 951,847.65 70,530,040.30 9,988,279 05 84,261,978.00 649,662.86 7,750,000.00 253,111,269.21 LIABILITIES: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 13,741.33 13,741.33 DUE TO OTHER AGENCIES 641,659.19 730,884.56 1,372,543.75 DUE TO OTHER FUNDS 273,804.01 1,987,384.47 2,261,188.48 INTEREST ADVANCE -DUE TO CITY 11,383,537.00 11,383,537.00 ACCRUED EXPENSES 16,468.50 16,468,50 PAYROLL LIABILITIES 5,065A1 5.065.41 STRONG MOTION INSTRUMENTS 5,005.44 5,005.44 FRINGE TOED LIZARD FEES 78,981.50 78,981.50 SUSPENSE 1,101.79 1.101.79 DUE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA PAYABLES TOTAL 1,019,358.67 14,118,274.53 15,137,633.20 ENGINEERING TRUST DEPOSITS SO. COAST AIR QUALITY DEPOSITS LORP DEPOSITS 14,499.00 14.499.00 DEVELOPER DEPOSITS 867,651.62 867,651.62 MISC, DEPOSITS 438,848.65 438,848.65 AGENCY FUND DEPOSITS 1,484,876.63 1,484,876.63 TOTAL DEPOSITS 2,791,376.90 14,499.00 2,805,875.90 DEFERRED REVENUE 387,604.00 11,378,904.00 11,766,50&00 OTHER LIABILITIES TOTAL 387,604.00 11,378,904.00 11,766,508.00 COMPENSATED ABSENCES PAYABLE 373.536.65 373,536.65 DUE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA 578,311.00 189,725.50 768,036.50 DUE TO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 10,989,847.00 10,989,847.00 DUE TO C.V. UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. 8,747,405.50 8,747,405.50 DUE TO DESERT SANDS SCHOOL DIST. BONDS PAYABLE 64,335,000.00 7,750,000.00 72,085,000.00 TOTAL LONG TERM DEBT 951,847.65 84,261,978.00 7,750,000.00 92,963,825.65 TOTAL LIABILITIES 4,198,339.57 951,847.65 25,511,677.53 84,261,978.00 7,750,000.00 122,673,842.75 EQUITY -FUND BALANCE 54,069,379.77 20,711,742.00 45,018,362.77 9,988,279.05 649,662.86 130,437,426.45 TOTAL LIABILITY & EQUITY 58,267,719.34 20 711,742 00 951,847 65 70,530,040.30 9,988,279.05 84,261,978.00 649,662.86 7,750,000.00 253,111,269.20 0.01 0.00 0.01 CASH & INVESTMENT TOTAL 100,275,034.92 PREMIUM/DISCOUNT ON INVESTMENT 265 991.33 TOTAL 100,541,026.25 Oil. COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: Transmittal of Revenue and Expenditure Reports dated December 31, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: February 19, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Transmittal of the December 31, 2001 Statement of Revenue and Expenditures for the City of La Quinta. Res tfully su itt , ohn M. alc ner, Finance Director A roved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese City Manager Attachments: 1. Revenue and Expenditures Report, December 31, 2001. O63", CITY OF LA QUINTA REVENUES - ALL FUNDS 07/01/2001-12/31/2001 FUNDS BUDGET RECEIVED RECEIVED General $14,332,929.75 $6,797,859.29 47.4% Library 95,000.00 87,913.18 92.5% Gas Tax Revenue 435,318.27 237,674.59 54.6% Cmaq/Istea 287,423.00 0.00 0.0% Federal Assistance 543,825.00 0.00 0.0% Assessment District 2000-1 0.00 10,712.62 0.0% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 102,391.75 1,072.23 1.0% Local Law Enforcement 27,004.00 27,169.77 100.6% Lighting & Landscaping 781,400.00 20,352.45 2.6% Quimby 16,500.00 137,129.00 831.1 % Infrastructure 11,000.00 79,759.50 725.1 % Village Parking 100.00 0.00 0.0% South Coast Air Quality 24,481.00 15,685.04 64.1 % LQ Public Safety Officer 2,200.00 2,263.39 102.9% Interest Allocation 0.00 (7,123.52) 0.0% Capital Improvement 51,262,351.36 6,391,824.10 12.5% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 699.84 0.0% Urban Forestry 11,000.00 0.00 0.0% Equipment Replacement 363,180.00 351,402.28 96.8% Information Technology 1,000,000.00 1,015,575.40 101.6% Arts In Public Places 132,900.00 74,703.28 56.2% Transportation 307,100.00 375,747.18 122.4% Parks & Recreation 221,500.00 211,423.10 95.5% Civic Center 323,100.00 301,419.41 93.3% Library Development 167,900.00 125,370.42 74.7% Community Center 58,600.00 56,341.54 96.1 % Street Facility 10,500.00 11,417.13 108.7% Park Facility 3,200.00 3,173.35 99.2% La Quinta Financing Authority 688,130.00 491,464.47 71.4% RDA Project Area No. 1 80,489,860.31 58,614,298.72 72.8% RDA Project Area No. 2 11,376,902.64 459,368.44 4.0% Total $163,075,797.08 $75,894,696.20 46.5% CC 6 04:37 PM02/11 /2002 CITY OF LA QUINTA EXPENDITURES - ALL FUNDS 07/01/2001-12/31/2001 FUNDs BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED REMAINING BUDGET % EXPENDED General $14,939,284.02 $6,184,417.94 $68,262.24 $8,686,603.84 41.4% Library 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Gas Tax 594,378.00 210,799.98 0.00 383,578.02 35.5% Cmaq/lstea 287,423.00 0.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.0% Federal Assistance 166,638.99 0.00 0.00 166,638.99 0.0% Proposed Assessment District 682,553.47 247,542.46 0.00 435,011.01 36.3% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 100,191.75 0.00 0.00 100,191.75 0.0% Local Law Enforcement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Lighting & Landscaping 781,400.00 390,700.02 0.00 390,699.98 50.0% Quimby 317,381.29 100,966.82 0.00 216,414.47 31.8% Infrastructure 2,368,369.00 260,663.97 0.00 2,107,705.03 11.0% Village Parking (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 South Coast Air Quality 0.00 4,836.69 0.00 (4,836.69) 0.0% Lq Public Safety Officer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Interest Allocation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Capital Improvement 51,262,352.00 6,391,824.10 2,000.00 44,868,527.90 12.5% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 59,403.39 0.00 (59,403.39) 0.0% Urban Forestry 11,000.00 0.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.0% Equipment Replacement 380,209.00 80,649.98 11,299.04 288,259.98 21.2% Arts In Public Places 689,515.71 12,555.00 0.00 676,960.71 1.8% Transportation 1,854,850.03 74,555.14 0.00 1,780,294.89 4.0% Parks & Recreation 4,508,263.00 44,289.80 0.00 4,463,973.20 1.0% Civic Center 204,660.00 102,330.00 0.00 102,330.00 50.0% Library Development 623,324.00 7,145.60 0.00 616,178.40 1.1% Community Center 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Street Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Park Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Information Technology 476,372.00 130,893.70 27,771.66 317,706.64 27.5% La Quinta Financing Authority 1,209,498.78 487,920.00 0.00 721,578.78 40.3% RDA Project Area No. 1 49,216,740.46 29,291,392.66 0.00 19,925,347.80 59.5% RDA Project Area No. 2 16,076,522.44 2,977,545.89 6,400.00 13,092,576.55 18.5% Total $146,749,034.09 $47 060,433.14 $115,732.94 $99,572,868.01 32.1 % C! 6 04:37 PM02/11/2002 CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2001-1213112001 GENERAL FUND REVENUES DETAIL REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED TAXES: Property Tax 520,600.00 235,799.02 284,800.98 45.290% No Low Property Tax Distribution 450,600.00 236,791.25 213,808.75 52.550% Document Transfer Tax 380,000.00 182,257.54 197,742.46 47.960% Sales Tax 3,217,500.00 1,488,821.66 1,728,678.34 46.270% Transient Occupancy Tax 3,595,000.00 885,546.33 2,709,453.67 24.630% Franchise Tax 537,500.00 116,522.51 420,977.49 21,680% TOTAL TAXES 8,701,200.00 3,145,738.31 5,555,461.69 36.150% LICENSE & PERMITS: Business License 152,000.00 73,695.20 78,304.80 48.480% Animal License 12,400.00 5,450.75 6,949.25 43.960% Building Permits 412,500.00 618,271.50 (205,771.50) 149.880% Plumbing Permits 89,400.00 100,719.33 (11,319.33) 112.660% Electrical Permits 68,000.00 105,415.84 (37,415.84) 155.020% Mechanical Permits 37,000.00 58,220.55 (21,220.55) 157.350% Misc. Permits 48,300.00 22,839.25 25,460.75 47.290% TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS 819,600.00 984,612.42 (165,012.42) 120.130% FEES: Sale of Maps & Publications 2,150.00 385.48 1,764.52 17.930% Community Services Fees 157,825.00 66,738.64 91,086.36 42.290% Bldg & Safety Fees 357,950.00 415,104.65 (57,154.65) 115.970% Community Development Fees 222,000.00 101,884.16 120,115.84 45.890% Public Works Fees 468,550.00 320,144.24 148,405.76 68.330% TOTAL FEES 1,208,475.00 904,257.17 304,217.83 74.830% INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0 Motor Vehicle In -Lieu 1,257,600.00 588,858.71 668,741.29 46.820% Motor Vehicle Code Fines 50,300.00 15,920.30 34,379.70 31.650% Parking Violations 25,000.00 59,962.95 (34,962.95) 239.850% Misc. Fines 5,000.00 4,733.24 266.76 94.660% AB939 159,900.00 84,126.94 75,773.06 52.610% State of California Grant 134,105.00 38,105.00 96,000.00 28.410% CSA152 Assessment 126,700.00 32,309.17 94,390.83 25.500% TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1,758,605.00 824,016.31 934,588.69 46.860% INTEREST - Pooled 624,900.00 334,981.71 289,918.29 53.610% INTEREST - Non Pooled 910,700.00 597,418.11 313,281.89 65.600% MISCELLANEOUS Miscellaneous Revenue 27,700.00 6,843.41 20,856.59 24.710% Cash Over/(Short) 0.00 (8.15) 8.15 0.000% TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 27,700.00 6,835.26 20,864.74 24.680% TRANSFER IN 281,749.75 0.00 281,749.75 0.000% TOTAL GENERAL FUND 14,332,929.75 6,797,859.29 7,535,070.46 47.430% '6i 04:37 PM02/11 /2002 U65 CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED LIBRARY: County of Riverside 75,000.00 75,000.00 0.00 100.000% Interest 20,000.00 12,913.18 7,086.82 64.570% TOTAL LIBRARY 95,000.00 87,913.18 7,086.82 92.540% GAS TAX REVENUE: Section 2105 135,600.00 70,191.05 65,408.95 51.760% Section 2106 98,200.00 48,212.04 49,987.96 49.100% Section 2107 175,100.00 92,017.70 83,082.30 52.550% Section 2107.5 5,000.00 6,000.00 (1,000.00) 120.000% Traffic Congestion Relief 13,718.27 13,718.27 0.00 100.000% Interest 7,700.00 7,535.53 164.47 97.860% TOTAL GAS TAX 435,318.27 237,674.59 197,643.68 54.600% CMAQ/ISTEA CMAQ/ISTEA Grant 287,423.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL CMAQ/ISTEA 287,423.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.000% FEDERAL ASSISTANCE REVENUE: CDBG Grant 543,825.00 0.00 543,825.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 543,825.00 0.00 543,825.00 0.000% ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1 Interest 10,712.62 (10,712.62) 0.000% Assessment Bond Proceeds 0.00 0.00 0.000% Prepayments -sewer assessments 0.00 0.00 0.000% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 0.00 10,712.62 (10,712.62) 0.000% SLESF (COPS) REVENUE: SLESF (Cops) Funding 100,191.75 0.00 100,191.75 0.000% Interest 2,200.00 1,072.23 1,127.77 48.740% TOTAL SLESF (COPS) 102,391.75 1,072.23 101,319.52 1.050% LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT REVENUE: LLEBG Funding 26,704.00 26,704.00 0.00 100.000% Interest 300.00 465.77 (165.77) 155.260% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL LLEBG 27,004.00 27,169.77 (165.77) 100.610% LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING REVENUE: Assessment 781,400.00 20,352.45 761,047.55 2.600% Developer 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING 781,400.00 20,352.45 761,047.55 2.600% QUIMBY REVENUE: Quimby Fees 126,375.00 (126,375.00) 0.000% Interest 16,500.00 10,754.00 5,746.00 65.180% TOTAL QUIMBY 16,500.00 137,129.00 (1202629.00) 831.080% 04:37 PM02/11 /2002 CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) INFRASTRUCTURE REVENUE: Infrastructure Fee Interest Transfer in TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE VILLAGE PARKING REVENUE: Interest TOTAL VILLAGE PARKING SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY REVENUE: S.C.A.Q. Contribution Interest TOTAL SCAQ LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER FUND Transfer In Interest TOTAL LQ PUBLIC SAFETY INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND: Pooled Cash Allocated Interest Transfer In TOTAL INTEREST ALLOCATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: CVAG CVWD County of Riverside State of Ca- Office Emer. Services JPIA IID DSUSD State of California SB300 Funding Surface Transportation SB821-Bicycle Path Grant APP Contribution Developer Agreement Funding Transfers in From Other Funds TOTAL CIP REVENUE LQ NORTE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: Prepayment Bond Proceeds Interest TOTAL LQ NORTE CIP 04:37 PM02/11 /2002 REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 0.00 0.00 0.000% 11,000.00 79,759.50 (68,759.50) 725.090% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 11,000.00 79,759.50 (68,759.50) 725.090% 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.000% 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.000% 21,881.00 14,510.09 7,370.91 66.310% 2,600.00 1,174.95 1,425.05 45.190% 24,481.00 15,685.04 8,795.96 64.070% 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 100.000% 200.00 263.39 (63.39) 131.700% 2,200.00 2,263.39 (63.39) 102.880% (7,123.52) 7,123.52 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 (7,123.52) 7,123.52 0.000% 13,655,958.18 2,035,746.36 11,620,211.82 14.910% 1,709,906.00 0.00 1,709,906.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 100.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 530,600.00 0.00 530,600.00 0.000% 19,365.74 0.00 19,365.74 0.000% 12,000,118.00 0.00 12,000,118.00 0.000% 93,175.00 0.00 93,175.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 182,142.84 59,149.77 122,993.07 32.470% 23,046,085.60 4,271,927.97 18,774,157.63 18.540% 51,262,351.36 6,391,824.10 44,870,527.26 12.470% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 699.84 (699.84) 0.000% 0.00 699.84 (699.84) 0.000% l� 6 CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) URBAN FORESTRY Grant Revenue Interest TOTAL URBAN FORESTRY EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND: Equipment Charges Capital Contribution Interest Transfers In TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND: Charges for services Capital Contribution Interest Transfers In TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES REVENUE: Arts in Public Places Arts in Public Places Credits Applied Interest TOTAL ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES TRANSPORTATION Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL TRANSPORTATION PARKS & RECREATION Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION CIVIC CENTER Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL CIVIC CENTER LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 11,000.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 11,000.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.000% 304,980.00 304,982.00 (2.00) 100.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 58,200.00 46,420.28 11,779.72 79.760% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 363,180.00 351 402.28 11 777.72 96.760% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 15,575.40 (15,575.40) 0.000% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 100.000% 1,000,000.00 1,015,575.40 (15,575.40) 101.560% 111,300.00 60,107.59 51,192.41 54.010% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 21,600.00 14,595.69 7,004.31 67.570% 132 900.00 74,703.28 58,196.72 56.210% 284,000.00 301,953.45 (17,953.45) 106.320% 23,100.00 73,793.73 (50,693.73) 319.450% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 307,100.00 375,747.18 (68,647.18) 122.350% 201,000.00 188,464.00 12,536.00 93.760% 20,500.00 22,959.10 (2,459.10) 112.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 221,500.00 211,423.10 10,076.90 95.450% 284,500.00 274,727.79 9,772.21 96.570% 38,600.00 26,691.62 11,908.38 69.150% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 323,100.00 301,419.41 21,680.59 93.290% 150,000.00 110,885.00 39,115.00 73.920% 17,900.00 14,485.42 3,414.58 80.920% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 167,900.00 125,370.42 42,529.58 74.670% 04:37 PM02/11 /2002 CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL REMAINING % (continued) BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED COMMUNITY CENTER Developer fees 53,500.00 50,235.00 3,265.00 93.900% Interest 5,100.00 6,106.54 (1,006.54) 119.740% TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 58,600.00 56,341.54 2,258.46 96.150% STREET FACILITY Developer fees 9,500.00 10,070.37 (570.37) 106.000% Interest 1,000.00 1,346.76 (346.76) 134.680% TOTAL STREET FACILITY 10,500.00 11,417.13 (917.13) 108.730% PARK FACILITY Developer fees 3,000.00 2,817.00 183.00 93.900% Interest 200.00 356.35 (156.35) 178.180% TOTAL PARK FACILITY 3,200.00 3,173.35 26.65 99.170% 0 �r) 04:37 PM02/11 /2002 U U 0 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT 07/01 /2001 -12/31 /2001 REMAINING % BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED GENERAL GOVERNMENT: LEGISLATIVE 585,800.00 231,896.15 0.00 353,903.85 39.6% CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 613,200.00 240,482.02 483.75 372,234.23 39.2% ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 910,000.00 358,354.98 0.00 551,645.02 39.4% PERSONNEURISK MGT 572,872.00 396,304.56 0.00 176,567.44 69.2% TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 2,681,872.00 1,227,037.71 483.75 1,454,350.54 45.8% FINANCE: FISCAL SERVICES 542,515.00 262,592.36 0.00 279,922.64 48.4% CENTRAL SERVICES 311,205.00 121,271.41 0.00 189,933,59 39.0% TOTAL FINANCE 853,720.00 383,863.77 0.00 469,856.23 45.0% CITY CLERK 373,650.00 164,557.13 209,092.87 44.0% COMMUNITY SERVICES SENIOR CENTER 257,600.00 108,530.80 2,764.87 146,304.33 42.1% PARKS & RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 797,058.00 235,100.09 3,878.00 558,079.91 29.5% PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAMS 90,800.00 25,553.39 0.00 65,246.61 28.1% TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 1,145,458.00 369,184.28 6,642.87 769,630.85 32.2% POLICE 4,137,185.75 1,073,455.78 52,235.62 3,011,494.35 25.9% BUILDING & SAFETY: BUILDING & SAFETY - ADMIN 179,700.00 87,310.11 0.00 92,389.89 48.6% CODE COMPLIANCE 478,484.00 193,687.40 0.00 284,796.60 40.5% ANIMAL CONTROL 166,043.00 70,276.66 0.00 95,766.34 42.3% BUILDING 618,488.00 319,564.07 0.00 298,923.93 51.7% EMERGENCY SERVICES 96,524.00 67,902.55 0.00 28,621.45 70.3% FIRE 67,278.00 6,745.75 0.00 60,532.25 10.0% CIVIC CENTER BUILDING -OPERATIONS 1,088,751.00 747,583.76 0.00 341,167.24 68.7% TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY 2,695,268.00 1,493.070.30 0.00 1,202,197.70 55.4% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - ADMIN 469,000.00 166,623.72 0.00 302,376.28 35.5% CURRENT PLANNING 689,807.00 252,004.62 0.00 437,802.38 36.5% TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,158,807.00 418,628.34 0.00 740,178.66 36.1% PUBLIC WORKS: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 252,200.00 130,323.77 1,000.00 120,876.23 51.7% DEVELOPMENT & TRAFFIC 634,668.00 415,014.63 7,900.00 211,753.37 65.4% MAINT/OPERATIONS- STREETS 1,548,886.00 285,911.85 0.00 1,262,974.15 18.5% MAINT/OPERATIONS - LTG/LANDSCAPING 1,359,699.00 589,196.26 0.00 770,502.74 43.3% CAPITAL PROJECTS 387,420.00 92,059.58 0.00 295,360.42 23.8% TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 4,182,873.00 1,512,506.09 8,900.00 2,661,466.91 36.2% TRANSFERS OUT 1,698,014.27 1,134,344.80 0.00 563,669.47 66.8% GENERAL FUND REIMBURSEMENTS (3,987.564.00) (1,592,230.26) 0.00 (2,395,333.74) 39.9% NET GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 14 939 284.02 6,184,417.94 68 262.24 8,686,603.84 41.4% 04:37 PM02/11 /2002 u l o CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2001-12/31/2001 OTHER CITY FUNDS REMAINING % EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED LIBRARY FUND: PROJECT EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% GAS TAX REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 421,600.00 210,799.98 0.00 210,800.02 50.0% TRANSFER OUT 172,778.00 0.00 0.00 172,778.00 0.0% REIMBURSE GE TOTAL GAS TAX 594 378.00 210 799.98 0.00 383 578.02 35.5% QUIMBY FUND: TRANSFER OUT 317,381.29 100,966.82 0,00 216,414.47 31.8% FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND: TRANSFER OUT 166,638.99 0.00 0.00 166,638.99 0.0% SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 4,836.69 0.00 (4,836.69) 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 0.00 4,836.69 0.00 (4,836.69) 0.0% CMAQ/ISTEA TRANSFER OUT VILLAGE Parking TRANSFER OUT LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRIBUTIONS LLEBG FUND TRANSFER OUT 287 423.00 0.00 0.00 287 423.00 0.0% (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% SLESF (COPS) TRANSFER OUT 100 191.75 0.00 0.00 100 191.75 0.0% LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DIST: REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 781,400.00 390,700.02 0.00 390,699.98 50.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL LTG/LANDSCAPING FUND 781,400.00 390,700.02 0.00 390,699.98 50.0% INFRASTRUCTURE FUND CONSTRUCTION REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND TRANSFER OUT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1 COSTS OF ISSUANCE TRANSFER TO AGENCY FUND TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 2,368,369.00 260,663.97 0.00 2,107,705.03 11.0% TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE 2,368,369.00 260 663.97 0.00 2,107,705.03 11.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 682,553.47 247,542.46 0.00 435,011.01 36.3% TOTAL AD 2000-1 682,553.47 247 542.46 0.00 435 011.01 36.3% 04:37 P M 02/11 /2002 p` 1 R.• �iJi� CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2001-12/31/2001 ° OTHER CITY FUNDS REMAINING % EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 1,854,850.03 74,555.14 0.00 1,780,294.89 4.0% TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 1,854,850.03 74 555.14 0.00 1,780,294.89 4 0% PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 4,508,263.00 44,289.80 0.00 4,463,973.20 1.0% TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 4,508,263.00 44 289.80 0.00 4,463,973.20 1 0% CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 204,660.00 102,330.00 0.00 102,330.00 50.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL CIVIC CENTER 204,660.00 102,330.00 0.00 102 330.00 50.0% LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 623,324.00 7,145.60 0.00 616,178.40 1.1% TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 623,324.00 7,145.60 0.00 616 178.40 1.1 % COMMUNITY CENTER PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% STREET FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL STREET FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% PARK FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL PARK FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 50,079,648.62 6,202,021.84 2,000.00 43,875,626.78 12.4% PROJECT REIMBURSEMENTS TO GEN FUND 1,182,703.38 189,802.26 0.00 992,901.12 16.0% TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 51,262,352.00 6,391,824.10 2,000.00 44,868,527.90 12.5% ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND MAINTENANCE EXPENSES-APP 2,000.00 1,425.00 0.00 575.00 71.3% OPERATING EXPENSES-APP 5,000.00 (785.00) 0.00 5,785.00 -15.7% ART PURCHASES 265,340.00 4,000.00 0.00 261,340.00 1.5% TRANSFER OUT 417,175.71 7,915.00 0.00 409,260.71 1.9% TOTAL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES 689 515.71 12 555.00 0.00 676 960.71 1.8% LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND PROJECT EXPENSES 0.00 4,176.20 0.00 (4,176.20) 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 59,403.39 0.00 (59,403.39) 0.0% TOTAL LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND 0.00 63,579.59 0.00 (63,579.59) 0.0% URBAN FORESTRY GRANT TRANSFER OUT 11 000.00 0.00 0.00 11 000.00 0.0% VILLAGE PARKING TRANSFER OUT (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 476 372.00 130 893.70 27 771.66 317,706.64 27 5% EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 380 209.00 80 649.98 11 299.04 288 259.98 21 2% f� 04:37 PM02/11 /2002 CV 4 44 QdArA COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: ITEM TITLE: February 19, 2002 Adoption of a Resolution Establishing Fees for Checks Returned Without Payment RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Currently, the City does not charge a fee for checks returned without payment. If a fee is established, it will have a small positive impact on the City's revenue. The expenses associated with returned checks (Finance department staff time, other departments' time regarding the original reason for the check, telephone calls, and our own rank's service charge to the City of $3.50 per check) are estimated at approximately $30.00 per check. Per the City Attorney, if a fee is adopted for returned checks, it must reasonably equate to the cost associated with the processing and collection of the unpaid obligation. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The City has approximately ten checks returned each month for nonpayment of funds. Each time a check is returned, the department responsible for the check's original issuance must be notified, and any pending permits or other work suspended until the check is paid. At times the City has already completed the original work by the time the check is returned. Upon notification by our bank of the returned check, staff immediately contacts the issuer by telephone, requesting that they pay the obligation by cash, money order or cashier's check. Whenever possible, the check is redeposited, but "closed account" checks can only be processed once through the bank. If payment is not received within one week, with follow-up phone calls, staff then sends a courtesy letter notifying the issuer of the problem, offering a ten day grace period to make the check good. The City uses the Riverside County District Attorney's Bad Check Restitution Program for collections, if the issuer does not pay the obligation after the grace period expires. A complaint form is filed, along with the original check, after which time restitution must be collected by the District Attorney's office. Once the complaint has been filed, the check writer must complete the Bad Check Restitution program in order to stop criminal prosecution proceedings. The District Attorney's office stops the restitution process only if they determine that a check is non -prosecutable. If a fee is adopted by the Council, staff will continue utilizing the District Attorney's Bad Check Restitution program to enforce payment of returned checks. The following table represents a summary of neighboring cities' bad check fees: City Cathedral City Coachella Desert Hot Springs Indian Wells Indio Palm Desert Palm Springs Rancho Mirage County of Riverside FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: Bad Check Fee $25.00 $25.00 $10.00, rate increase being considered $10.00 $30.00 $ 0.00 $25.00 $25.00 $64.50 (based upon cost allocation study done last year) The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council establishing a fee of $30.00 for checks returned without payment; 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council establishing a fee for checks returned without payment at a different amount; 3. Do not adopt a Resolution establishing a fee for checks returned without payment; 18 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Jo n M. Falconer, Finance Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager UO3 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING FEES FOR CHECKS RETURNED WITHOUT PAYMENT WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta occasionally receives checks in payment for City services that are returned by the bank, without payment; and WHEREAS, the City incurs expenses associated with collection of these returned checks. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: A fee of is hereby established and shall be paid by the issuer of any check returned for non-payment of funds, prior to the unpaid obligation being released by the City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this day of 2002 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: JOHN J. PEIVA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ID8D 065 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: KATHY JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 0u6r COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 Authorization for Overnight Travel for a Code Compliance Officer to Attend a Training Class Given by Southern California Association of Code Enforcement Officials, Inc., in Anaheim, CA, February 21 through 23, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 15 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve authorization for overnight travel for a Code Compliance Officer to attend a training class given by Southern California Association of Code Enforcement Officials, Inc., in Anaheim, CA, February 21 through 23, 2002. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The training will be funded from Travel, Training and Meetings Account #101-352- 637-000. The breakdown of estimated expenditures for this class is as follows: ♦ Registration $120 ♦ Meals 50 ♦ Travel 25 ♦ Hotel 200 Total $395 CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: This course will improve the skills and abilities of the Code Compliance Officer in the performance of her duties and ensure that our Code Compliance Department is operating within all legal requirements. Please see the attached pages for course titles (Attachment 1) . FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve authorization for overnight travel for a Code Compliance Officer to attend a training class given by Southern California Association of Code Enforcement Officials, Inc., in Anaheim, CA, February 21 through 23, 2002; or 2. Do not approve the request for overnight travel; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, 6� Tom Hartung, Buildin6 and Safety Director Approved for submission by: p/ Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Announcement showing class subjects 080 01, 2 s.C.A.C.E.O. ATTACHMENT 1 NROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION CLASSES FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 229 2002 Basic 105 — Community Development Supervisory 401— Field Supervision SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2002 Basic 104 — Community Relations Advanced 305 —Community Development and Redevelopment * *Instructors to be announced* SCHEDULE OF EVENTS 7:00 — 8:00 Registration & Continental Breakfast 8:00 — 12:00 Professional Certification Program 12:00 — 1:00 Hosted Lunch 1:00 — 5:00 Professional Certification Program No College Credit for Arrivals After 9:00 a.m. TRAINING LOCATION Quality Hotel Maingate — Anaheim 616 W. Convention Way Anaheim, CA 92802 Reservations: (714)750-3131 or (800)231-6215 Mention S. C.A. C. E. O. for discount room rates. $69.95 single or double_for rooms reserved prior to Ul/U//UL Registration Form NOTE: You are encouraged to register as early as possible. Registration fees include admission to the training, lunch and parking. Registration Fees: MN4embers $60 per class. []Non -Members $90 per class Name j 0-- G [<( M l S a V"'O-c 0-- Jurisdiction 0"('k L., Address `7 �j !4 e �r✓t Q City �._.r,�..r �c,�,� `�� State CGc. Zip GJ�'�LG'2S 3 Telephone % 4 V.70 0 FAX E-mail February 22, 2002 *05 Community Development []4401 Field Supervision February 23, 2002 tft 104 Community Relation 04305 Comm. Development/Redevelopment Please make checks payable to S.C.A.C.E.O. and send with this registration form to: S.C.A.C.E.O. P.O. Box 110, Anaheim, CA 92815-0110 To register by telephone or fax please contact Lylith Cook Office (760) 240-7511 Fax (760) 247-3 885 O8," X **ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO FOLLOW REGARDING COURSE DESCRIPTION AND COURSE INSTRUCTORS** "4� a�-08 0 y D�1 "�'S A- G if (b �• /yN' CC �• O' w t O y rD `L7 CL ., wQ O��•"1, 0 rD �• N N r* ; �. nw7 O fl (D Q t i1Q .:..• r R 0 o �*1 .tea .<. • .`� �n fC w "L7 p rL-- N (D p G O 'a tat op -0 (A o O O "' N O ro^ O' G r-L`C N w _ Cb n CL O CT w 0 Cl0 i7Q N ti N a� (D O r� < VN ¢+ • M fb+ Q ^ � O • ►`3 A y l°)a ►may t�/f O-t �� o a � ifl ° O O b `C n '0o „•O r1' O N n O G' CD py • � r{ � rD N � `C o '� h 'r�i • "�'t zr ¢ y 2 p . .0 CD O N �h w 0 p � y O C1 ,•,.� w h o C~ CD l ) cryn '•1 O p- rA -''TT'00 G �i 'S ��",• G. F... 0, y L :3 FF"• a. �. O C7 A CD w ;D..�o��'��_ o y (D r-L p n N oGtroy 0 ✓ ~ H - Po" rL ° o, �° :; 7y h" CL C y �' Cl' G p fJQ• O 0 -, n 0- ;; '� CD r-L ^n C n (D 0 CL a c p n G G O p Q' 0 w pCi aQ' CL (D (D CL ro-r iQ n���'� w w O Z n O e cro y y O rR y yrq w p . o y CL y n�E o OrL vD CD Q. S•. CrJ x Oo � Clay o r. �' C7 0, 0 (oi O lb o o N A- N Qh ►" a CAo •" '� UO oCo p (D Z o r-L o '* O .� .o O n CL y. i (b <• n O n f D rL ftq CD (D CD L o C < (rbD y eb (D Q. 0 00 h C w a O y C)p',G crp-` r-L o Cl- L ::3 CD O0 CD � cry a ra; n oa (b rr1 (D r1 • O 0 a o .-r G o CL M YC yCD Z rL r-L o Q G fI'D/y.•. p n O- O (D n p ° tr r-L o o rt O w �' w N CL CD T' `• � O ?' O •— n Z C G �. Z o� p CC �' R+ ry aF7. O 0 n CD o ° y a ( «" p r`� r7 CL fD O (D (D (D as y `C o' 0 rb CD o O � n n� o °, �• o0 °Ul p < rb crq 5. ° a n' o G (D' .n} y CA0 (1 (D G OCL (D G n tD p C o N w `/ R p o CD' w 0 Q w rb �' <• � �• � �(Dy n iiQ O P1 • � � � GCL C3y UGq � n G y 00 00 N y 0 0 �.. o o r-L a- a. o' w `n ,� O r, y o r (D CC VO o o A. X f (wD • o o^ b �e�Zln rA r Pt 0 p ti � (D r'•t � � O � �w N ] 0 7+ a- C!Q UQ �•" y O n Al O `< Cy O cr O •v O O w O fD �' _� p CD (D C/) N p< w p w w p- o y p C- G G n r" CD O ° lD UQ o ro o " y (7Q' cn Cp L M ' y k fb `C O r" d w � � •' H � � rn � . `C UQ G 'l7 ^• N G o l 4. w O o w �D' "b A-• o � C9 C1 L p CL � n w G w ro w y a CL '•p o pr y `"� L1• y w < �. `' CI- cm.r ,'" 3. 0 p . y y y• 0 y O' O T a 0 4t!t 4 4 a" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: Authorization for Overnight Travel for the Community Safety Manager to Attend a Class Given by Victor Valley College, in Barstow, CA, March 3 through 8, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Community Safety Manager to attend a class given by Victor Valley College, in Barstow, CA, March 3 through 8, 2002. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The training will be funded from Travel, Training and Meetings Account #101-355- 637-000. The breakdown of estimated expenditures for this class is as follows: ♦ Registration $105 ♦ Meals 100 ♦ Travel 50 ♦ Hotel 500 Total $755 CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: This course, "Fire Command 2A; Command Tactics at Major Fires," will improve the skills and abilities of the Community Safety Manager to assist the City Manager in commanding the Emergency Operations Center (EOC). The Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) design was based on the fire command structure. Additionally, this class is a prerequisite for "Fire Command 2D; Planning for Large Scale Disasters" which will be attended in the future. Please see the attached pages for course description. (Attachment 1). Q8o FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Community Safety Manager to attend a class given by Victor Valley College, in Barstow, CA, March 3 through 8, 2002; or 2. Do not approve the request for overnight travel; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, IPK Tom Hartung, Building and Safety Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Announcement showing class subjects CFSTES Course: COMMANDING THE INITIAL RESPONSE ATTACHMENT 1 Hours: 16 Designed For: Company officers, training officers, and senior fire fighters who serve as incidents commanders at initial response incidents Description: This NFA hand-off course is designed to give the participant the information and skills necessary to establish command, perform size -up, develop and implement an action plan, transfer command and organize an incident using an effective fireground management system. Prerequisites: None Certification: Volunteer Fire Officer CFSTES Course: so" 0 0 — FIRE COMMAND lA Command Principles for Company Officers Hours: 40 Designed For: First -in incident commander and company officers Description: This course provides instruction and simulation time pertaining to the initial decision and action processes at a working fire. The course includes areas of discussion on the fire officer, fire behavior, fire ground resources, operations, and management. Prerequisites: 1-220 (Basic 1CS) Certification: Fire Officer so" ov CFSTES Course: FIRE COMMAND 1B Hazardous Materials Command Principles for Company Officers Hours: 40 Designed For: First -in incident commander and company officers Description: This course provides instruction in tactics and strategies and scene management principles for incidents involving hazardous materials. The course includes areas of discussion on identification and hazard mitigation, decontamination, protective clothing, environmental concerns, and legal issues. Prerequisites: Fire Command 1 A,1-220 (Basic 1CS) Certification: Fire Officer CFSTES Course: FIRE COMMAND 2A Command Tactics at Major Fires ct }� 1999 CALIFORNIA STATE FIRE TRAINING PAGE 11 Hours: 40 Designed For: Chief officers, company officers, and training officers Description: This course prepares the officer to use management techniques and the Incident �A Command System when commanding multiple alarms or large suppression forces. Prerequisites: Fire Command 1A,1-220 (Basic ICS) Certification: Chief Officer CFSTES Course: FIRE COMMAND 2B Management of Major Hazardous Materials Incidents Hours: 40 Designed For: Chief officers, company officers, and training officers Description: This course includes areas of discussion on information and data bases, organizations, agencies and institutions involved in hazardous materials response and research, planning for your community's hazardous materials problems, legislation, litigation and liabilities of hazardous materials responses. Prerequisites: Fire Command 1B, Fire Command 2A, I-220 (Basic ICS) Certification: Chief Officer c CFSTES Course: FIRE COMMAND 2C High Rise Fire Tactics Hours: 40 Designed For: Chief officers and experienced company officers Description: This course is approached from a system basis and is applied to both small and large high-rise buildings. Topics include: Prefire planning, building inventory, problem identification, ventilation methods, water supply, elevators, life safety, strategy and tactics, application of the ICS, and specific responsibilities. Case studies and simulation are used. Prerequisites: Fire Command 2A,1-220 (Basic ICS) Certification: Chief Officer iCFSTES Course: FIRE COMMAND 2D Planning for Large Scale Disasters Hours: 40 Designed For: Chief officers, company officers, and planners PAGE 12 CALIFORNIA STATE FIRE TRAINING 1999 089 Description: Key topics include: Principles of disaster planning and management, fire service emergency plans, emergency operations centers, case studies of various natural and man made disasters, and roles of local, state and federal OES and emergency management agencies, discussion of multi -hazard and ICS planning techniques, and principles of exercising emergency management staffs. Prerequisites: Fire Command 2A,1-220 (Basic ICS) Certification: Chief Officer so" 0 0 CFSTES Course: FIRE COMMAND 2E Wildland Fire Fighting Tactics Hours: 40 Designed For: Fire officers who have command responsibilities at wildland fires Description: This course contains such topics as California's wildland fire problem, wildland fire safety, weather effects, wildland fuels, wildland fire behavior, initial attack methods, using support equipment, using topographic maps, strategy and tactics, and air attack operations. Involves class participation and simulation. Prerequisites: Fire Command 2A,1-220 (Basic ICS) Certification: Chief Officer so" v v CFSTES Course: PREPARING FOR INCIDENT COMMAND Hours: 16 Designed For: Company officers, training officers, and senior fire fighters who serve as incident commanders at initial response incidents Description: This NFA hand-off course provides the concepts of incident Command as they apply to initial response incidents, and the ability to relate fire behavior preincident information, fire flow and proper communications in order to effectively command an incident with emphasis on fire fighter safety. Prerequisites: None Certification: Volunteer Fire Officer 1999 CALIFORNIA STATE FIRE TRAINING PAGE 13 `} r COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Authorization for Overnight Travel for the Senior Engineer to Attend the League of California Cities, Public Works Officers Institute in San Diego, California on March 6, 2002 through March 8, 2002 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Senior Engineer to attend a three-day Public Works Officers Institute (Attachment 1) presented by the League of California Cities in the City of San Diego, California on March 6, 2002 through March 8, 2002. This seminar, along with overnight and travel reimbursement expenses, will be funded through the Public Works Development and Traffic Travel and Training, Account No. 101-452-637- 000. The approved fiscal year 2001 /2002 budget identifies $1,000 for this conference. The estimated expenditures for this seminar are as follows: ► Seminar Enrollment = $ 425.00 ► Overnight Lodging = $ 320.00 ► Meals = $ 40.00 ► Travel Expense = $ 120.00 Total = $ 905.00 The estimated cost to attend the Institute is $905. As noted above, sufficient funds have been budgeted and are available. None. This three-day seminar conducted by the League of California Cities, Public Works Officers Institute educates Public Works Directors, Assistant Public Works Directors, City Engineers, and Chief Assistants on a number of issues facing Public Works Departments throughout the State. Q� T:\P WDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219c.wpd The Public Works Officers Institute is for public works professionals and provides an opportunity to learn about the latest developments in the public works field. Topics typically include issues related to managing transportation, infrastructure, water, and waste programs and services. This seminar also provides the opportunity to interact with other city Public Works Officials to discuss items of common interest. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Senior Engineer to attend a three-day Public Works Officers Institute presented by the League of California Cities in the City of San Diego, California on March 6, 2002 through March 8, 2002; or 2. Do not approve authorization for overnight travel for the Senior Engineer to attend a three-day Public Works Officers Institute presented by the League of California Cities in the City of San Diego, California on March 6, 2002 through March 8, 2002; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submittjyl, ,P Roy F. Step en n Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: �1. Thomas P. Genovese City Manager Attachments: 1. Public Works Officers Institute Flyer O -02 T:\PWDEPT\COLNCIL\2002\020219c.wpd ATTACHMENT 1 PUBLIC WORKS OFFICERS INSTITUTE Wednesday — Friday, March 6-8, 2002 Catamaran Resort Hotel, San Diego You'll Want to Attend If You Are A... • Public Works Director • Assistant Public Works Director • City Engineer • Assistant City Engineer You'll Benefit By... • A unique chance to discuss with CalTrans officials your pending projects • Briefings on aspects of the all-important subject of water quality and supply • Discussing current issues in the disposal of a -waste • Making valuable contacts with other professionals This Institute offers a unique opportunity to discuss hot topics such as staffing, organization structure, and local goals with your CalTrans Regional Director. These regional breakout sessions are designed to improve state and local project delivery by enhancing the partnership with your CalTrans district. Don't miss out on this unique opportunity — REGISTER NOW. If you are involved with municipal public works management, this is the meeting for youl Hotel Registration Deadline: Wednesday, February 6, 2002 Advance Registration Deadline: Wednesday, February 6, 2002 ifs Preliminary Program Wednesday, March 6, 2tv2 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Registration and CityBooks Open — Ballroom Foyer 10:00 — 11:30 a.m. Opening General Session I I AS — 1:15 p.m. General Luncheon 1:30 — 2:30 p.m. General Session LEAGUE'S STRATEGIC PLAN The League is embarked on a major effort to secure funds for cities. Learn how it affects public works and how you can help yourself in the effort. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE FOR PUBLIC WORKS OFFICERS Learn about the latest issues regarding public works and transportation. 2:45 — 3:45 p.m. General Session SMART GROWTH POLICIES AND YOUR FUTURE Smart growth policies are growing in California. Learn about smart growth land use policies and how they drive planning policies, which in turn drive public works policy and programs. 4:00 — 5:00 p.m. Concurrent Sessions I. PREVAILING WAGES Come and learn what the recent Department of Industrial Relations rulings, and the passage of SB 975, Chapter 938, Statutes of 2001 mean for your department. II. SHARING THE ROAD More and more people are walking and riding bicycles. Learn about pedestrian and bicycle transportation opportunities to promote livable communities. III. TECHNOLOGY AND PUBLIC WORKS How are e-mail, GIS, CAD, the Internet and other new technologies changing the way we operate in Public Works? Come learn about the way some cities are adapting, and how you can benefit. 5:00 — 6:00 p.m. Hosted Welcoming Reception Page 2 Thursday, Match 7, 2002 005, 7:30 — 8:45 a.m. Informal Continental Breakfasts I. ALTERNATIVE FUEL PROGRAMS The California Air Resources Board recently held fast to its mandate requiring automakers to market zero and low emissions vehicles in the state starting in 2003. With state grants, cities can augment fleets with electric car leases, or purchase hybrid vehicles and alternate fuel cars and trucks that run on compressed natural gas. The City of Vacaville recently won a Helen Putnam Award for their efforts. Learn what they're doing, and how you can develop similar programs. Ii. SO YOU'RE BUILDING A NEW CITY HALL... Building a new City Hall or other major public building can make or break a Public Works Director's career. Hear how to avoid some of the pitfalls, e.g. how to avoid a fixed budget; understand the language your architect speaks; pre -qualify contractors without raising the price; deal with your fellow department heads requests and expectations; pick the right staff to manage the project; and integrate finance and your records so you don't end up with the usual CIP accounting issues. III. ENVIRONMENTAL STREAMLINING Learn about CalTrans' recent efforts at streamlining environmental requirements, which include advancing environmental considerations into the planning process and proposed efficiency measures for FHWA. 9:00 — 9:45 a.m. General Session THE DIRECTION OF CHANGE A discussion of the changes CalTrans has undertaken in the past year to streamline project delivery and provide improved local assistance. 10:15 a.m. — 11:45 p.m. Concurrent Sessions 12 REGIONAL BREAKOUTS WITH CALTRANS DISTRICT DIRECTORS A popular session in 2000 and 2001, these breakouts provide public works officials with an Opportunity for a dialogue with their CalTrans District Directors on your key issues. Noon — 1:30 p.m. General Luncheon 2:00 — 3:15 p.m. Concurrent Sessions I. ENERGY UPDATE A summary of current and potential future energy issues facing California, including power plant siting, conservation and alternative energy opportunities. 11. LESSONS LEARNED: THE JOB OF A PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR IN CALIFORNIA'S CITIES Are you a new Public Works Director? If so, you won't want to miss this onel This interactive session will provide a unique opportunity to learn from Public Works Directors who've been around awhile about interesting situations you may find yourself in, and how others have handled them. Thursday, Match 7, 2002, continued 2:00 — 3:15 p.m. Concurrent Sessions, continued Page 3 006 III. CALIFORNIA TOXICS RULE The California Toxics Rule was mandated by the U.S. EPA and was approved by the California Regional Water Quality Board last fall. What this may mean to cities and/or sanitary districts is potentially treating discharged effluent to a higher quality than anyone could have managed, with no measurable environmental benefit. 3:45 - 5:00 P.M. Concurrent Sessions I. NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC ISSUES Is your community vocal when it comes to neighborhood traffic issues (e.g. parking permits, crosswalks and traffic calming)? Sacramento has transformed the "art" of traffic calming into a "science" from the standpoint of public policy and community involvement/partnerships. Learn about their extensive menu of traffic calming processes and initiatives. II. RETENTION AND THE ART OF MENTORING How are you passing along the wealth of experience and knowledge you have acquired over the years? Or are you? Learn some tips on how you can attract, retain and develop future public works leaders within your organization. III. IMPORTANCE OF PUBLIC RELATIONS IN PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS Ever had an unexpected, adverse public reaction to your street rehabilitation project? Learn successful public relations techniques, which can be implemented before and during any public construction project to gain and maintain public support, even when the public impacts are significant. 5:00 - 6:00 P.M. No Host Reception Friday, March 8, 2002 7:30 - 8:45 a.m. Informal Continental Breakfasts I. RIGHT OF WAY MANAGEMENT Increased demand for access into and use of the public right-of-way has created a need to become more sophisticated in our approach to ROW management and control. This session will provide a forum to share information on new initiatives and tactics utilized by cities to improve ROW management aimed at decreasing nuisance and disruption to business, neighborhoods, and the traveling public. WOMEN IN PUBLIC WORKS This is an opportunity to network with women who are public works professionals. Learn about their concerns and how they can be addressed. III. SYNTHETIC GRASS ATHLETIC FIELDS - THE NEW GENERATION OF PRODUCTS Having trouble keeping your lighted soccer fields green because of overuse? A new generation of synthetic grass is now in use all over the world and is far superior to the old "Astroturf' product. The City of Laguna Niguel has installed a synthetic grass soccer field after two years of investigating this new product. Find out what they have learned. Friday, March 8, 2002, continued 9:00 -10:15 a.m. Concurrent Sessions Page 4 I. WATER QUALITY ISSUES 0JO 007 Find out about the latest developments in a variety of water quality issues including storm water, effluent dependent waterways and NPDES. II. CURRENT ISSUES IN THE DISPOSAL OF E-WASTE Discarded computers and computer terminals, known as e-waste, are now considered a hazardous material and must be handled properly. This session will provide an update on the current status of disposal regulations, prohibitions and options, existing take -back programs, the role of local governments, and innovative ways to address a -waste issues. 10:45 a.m. — Noon Concluding General Session Noon Adjourn Page 5 Registration Advance register by Wednesday, February 6, 2002 for the full meeting and receive a bonus coupon worth $25 at the CityBooks bookstore at the meeting. Don't miss this great way to expand and share your learning with your colleagues in City Hall! Your advance registration must be postmarked no later than February 6, 2002. For any questions regarding registration, please contact the League conference registration office at 916/658-8291. 09" '008 County public works officials are encouraged to register for a full day on Thursday, March 7, 2002 to participate in the CalTrans regional breakouts and a variety of informative sessions. Advance Registration Full Meeting One Day Only Public Officials $425 Public Officials $275 All Others $475 All Others $325 Payment Payment in full must accompany the registration form. You may pay your registration fee by check, Visa or MasterCard. No purchase orders, American Express or Discover cards, please. If paying by credit card, you may register by faxing 916/658-8220. Refund Policy Advance registrants unable to attend can send a substitute, or receive a refund of the registration fee, less a $50 processing charge, by writing the League of California Cities, Conference Registration Office, 1400 K Street, Sacramento, CA 95814; Fax 916/658-8220. Requests for refunds must be received by Friday, March 1, 2002. Special Accommodations ® If you require reasonable accommodations related to facility access, communication and/or diet, please contact our Conference Registrar at 916/658-8291. Hotel Reservations The hotels are offering special League rates as indicated. To confirm hotel reservations, a deposit in the amount of the first night's guest room rate or a guarantee with a major credit card is required. Check -in time for the hotels is 3:00 p.m.; check-out time is noon. Luggage may be stored at the bell desk. The hotels offer a full refund if cancellation is made 24 hours prior to the arrival date. Record your cancellation number. If the League rate has sold out before the cut-off date, the next available rate will apply. Bahia Hotel 998 West Mission Boulevard San Diego, California 92109 800/288-0770 Fax: 858/488-1387 $159 single/double Catamaran Resort Hotel 3999 Mission Boulevard San Diego, California 92109 858/488-1081 Fax: 858/488-1387 $159 single/double Page 6 Spouses There is no registration fee for spouses who attend the meeting who are not city officials, or other public officials. Meal tickets may be purchased on -site at the League registration desk. There is no spouses' program planned. For further information on events going on in the area, contact the concierge desk of the hotel. Southwest Airlines The Southwest discount airfare program for California local government employees (city/countyYLOCAL) is as follows: Ticket -less travel is good on flights between California cities and Reno, Nevada. Reservations may be made for ticketless travel by calling Southwest Airlines Reservations; 800 435-9792 (code city/countyYLOCAL). Reservations may also be made through any local travel agency. Fares will be unrestricted and fully refundable. Details are posted on the League website at www.cacities.org, use keyword "Southwest." 09(� 009 City/Agency: League of California Cities Public Works Officers Institute Wednesday —Friday, March 6-8, 2002 Catamaran Hotel, San Diego REGISTRATION FORM I Advance Registration Enter first and last name, and official title as they should appear on meeting badge and registration Full Conference card. Please indicate spouse's name (if spouse is not Public Officials @ $425 a city or public official) if attending. If more than All Others @ $475 one registrant per city is attending, please attach TOTAL $ a list of names and titles. One Day Onlv Public Officials @ $275 Name Title All Others @ $325 Spouse (if attending) TOTAL $ Indicate which day: ® If you require reasonable accommodations ❑ Wednesday ❑ Thursday ❑ Friday related to facility access, communication and/or diet, please contact our Conference Registrar at 916/658- Payment Information: 8291. Make checks payable to League of California Cities. (No purchase orders, American Express or Discover Registration receipts will be mailed to the designated cards.) person below. Please provide the following: ❑ City Check ❑ Personal Check Name Title ❑ VISA ❑ MasterCard Address Name on Credit Card City Authorized Signature Zip Phone Credit Card Number Fax E-mail This form must be postmarked by Wednesday, Expiration Date February 6, 2002. For those paying with credit card only, you may fax to the League of California Cities at 916/658-8220. Please mail to: League of California Cities 1400 K Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Advance Registration Deadline for CityBooks coupon is Wednesday, February 6, 2002. After this date, please register on site. 093 010 League of California Cities Public Works Officers Institute Wednesday —Friday, March 6-8, 2002 Catamaran Hotel, San Diego HOTEL RESERVATION FORM Please make copies of this form if more than one room is to be reserved. If you choose to fax this form, complete the credit card information below. Please do not mail a duplicate copy. Phone reservations will not be accepted. Room assignments are based on a first -come, first -served basis. Name Title Address City Zip Telephone Fax Arrival Date a.m./p.m. Departure Date a.m. /p. m. Room Preference: ❑ No smoking room ❑ Handicapped access ❑ I will share a room with: ❑ Single - King ❑ Double - 1 Bed ❑ Double/Double - 2 Beds There is no guarantee on room type, although the hotel will do everything possible to accommodate your request. Deposit Information: Checks should be made payable to the hotel of your choice. All reservations must be guaranteed with payment for one night's room deposit, or a major credit card. If deposit is by credit card, please provide the following information: Name on Credit Card Type of Credit Card Credit Card Number Authorized Signature Expiration Date Reservation deadline is Wednesday, February 6, 2002. — Phone reservations will not be accepted. Return this form to the hotel of your choice: Bahia Hotel 998 West Mission Boulevard San Diego, California 92019 800/288-0770, fax: 858/488-1387 $159 single/double Catamaran Resort Hotel 3999 Mission Boulevard San Diego, California 92109 858/488-1081, fax: 858/488-1387 v $159 single/double 011 T 0 0 414f 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Authorization for Overnight Travel for the Public Works Assistant Engineer II to Attend the Floodplain Management and Duties of the Local Administrator Seminar Sponsored by the City of Santa Clarita and presented by the California Department of Water Resources in Santa Clarita, California on February 28, 2002 BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: g STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Public Works Assistant Engineer II to attend a one day Floodplain Management and Duties of the Local Administrator Seminar sponsored by the City of Santa Clarita and presented by the California Department of Water Resources in Santa Clarita, California on February 28, 2002. The breakdown of estimated expenditures for this training is as follows: Hotel Room $ 75.00 Travel $ 100.00 Meals $ 30.00 Total $ 205.00 Funds have been approved for this conference as part of the Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 Budget in the Public Works Development and Traffic/Travel, Training, and Meetings Account #101- 452-637-000. None. The Floodplain Management and Duties of the Local Administrator is sponsored by the City of Santa Clarita, and presented by the California Department of Water Resources. This training is designed for the public works staff from communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), and those staff engineers who may be assigned as the local administrator on behalf of the City. 1� T:\PW DEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219a. wpd Various topics to be discussed include Federal, State, and Local Community Roles, Floodplain Management vs. Flood Control, Duties of the Local Administrator, NFIP Compliance, FEMA Elevation Certificates, Substantial Improvement and Substantial Damage, Technical Standards, Map Reading and Maintenance, and Flood Insurance. The course is primarily lecture oriented. This course will be very beneficial training and instruction for the Public Works Assistant Engineer II in performing his floodplain administration duties. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Public Works Assistant Engineer II to attend a one day Floodplain Management and Duties of the Local Administrator Seminar sponsored by the City of Santa Clarita and presented by the California Department of Water Resources in Santa Clarita, California on February 28, 2002; or 2. Do not approve authorization for overnight travel for the Public Works Assistant Engineer II to attend a one day Floodplain Management and Duties of the Local Administrator Seminar sponsored by the City of Santa Clarita and presented by the California Department of Water Resources in Santa Clarita, California on February 28, 2002; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, -OV,Roy F. Step on, PE Interim Public orks Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese City Manager T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219a. wpd 002 CV T4�4f 4 4 Qum Ira COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Use of Funds from La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area 1 for Phase 1 Jefferson Street Project Improvements Within La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area 2 and Resolution Making Findings Pursuant to Health and Safety Code 33445 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council making certain findings pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445 to use La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area 1 Capital funding within La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area 2. Approve an appropriation of $1,844,030 in Project Area 1 Capital funding toward the Phase 1 Jefferson Street Project. Approve the re -budgeting of $1,844,030 in Infrastructure funds allocated to Phase 1 Jefferson Street Project into infrastructure reserves to be used for other eligible projects. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The FY 2001 /02 budgeted revenues are as follows: Revenue type S B-300 Infrastructure Art in Public Places CVAG Total Original $ 713,412 2,882,008 10,800 12,589,513 $16,195,733 ■ WWX6T§xV1@VJ $ 19,366 1,844,030 7,800 5,112,262 $6,983,458 10":)N The FY 2001 /02 budget did not contain RDA funding for Project Area 1 and 2. With the RDA Project Area 1 bond issue in August 2001, funding is available for the Phase 1 Jefferson Street project. The Infrastructure funds and its replacement developer impact fund do not have adequate funding available at this time to construct all of its projects. The Infrastructure fee funding of $1,844,030 is needed for other eligible projects. Given the nature of this project, the benefits to the residents and property owners in Project Area 1, and the inability for Project Area 2 to fund its own improvements, staff is recommending using RDA Project Area 1 funding for the entire Phase 1 Jefferson Street project. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: Since this Project included State, Coachella Valley Association of Government (CVAG) and RDA funding sources the projects have been or will be bid based upon the payment of prevailing wages. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: In August 2001, the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency issued Tax Allocation Bonds for Project Area 1. With this bond issue, RDA funding became available for eligible projects such as the Phase 1 Jefferson Street Project. The Phase 1 Jefferson Street Project extends along Jefferson Street from Highway 1 1 1 in the north to Ave 54 in the south and spans both Project Area 1 and Project Area 2 as outlined in Attachment 1. The dividing line between the Project Areas is at Ave 50 with Project Area 2 to the north and Project Area 1 to the south. The Agency may use its funds to finance public improvements outside the project area provided that certain findings can be made and that the findings can be supported by substantial evidence. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445 the Agency may pay for the cost of installation and construction of improvements which are publicly owned, even if outside the project area, if the City Council consents to the financing and makes the necessary findings which are as follows: • The public improvements are of benefit to the project area or the immediate neighborhood of the project area • No other reasonable means of financing such improvements are available to the community 10i • The agency's construction of the public improvements will assist in elimination of one or more blighting conditions in the project area. • The construction of these public improvements is consistent with the Redevelopment Agency five year implementation plan. The funds will be used to construct median islands along Jefferson Street and possible traffic signals as needed and will directly benefit those residents in Project Area 1 south of Ave 50 with safer streets. Project Area 2 does not have adequate funding to pay for this project. Attachment 2 provides a list of the anticipated improvements along Jefferson Street. The cost estimates for the Jefferson Street Landscape Improvement Project are $1,205,418 of which the La Quinta share totals $970,397 and the Indio share is $235,021. Of the La Quinta share of $9701397, $187,946 is in Project Area 2 and $782,451 is in Project Area 1. Any unused portion of the $1,844,030 would return to unallocated reserves if not spent on the project. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council making certain findings pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445 to approve the use of funds from La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area 1 for Phase 1 Jefferson Street Project Improvements within La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area 2; Approve an appropriation of $1,844,030 in Project Area 1 Capital funding toward the Phase 1 Jefferson Street Project; and Approve the re -budgeting of $1,844,030 in Infrastructure funds allocated to Phase 1 Jefferson Street Project into infrastructure reserves to be used for other eligible projects; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council making certain findings pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445 to approve the use of funds from La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area 1 for Phase 1 Jefferson Street Project Improvements within La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area 2; Do not approve an appropriation of $1,844,030 in Project Area 1 Capital funding toward the Phase 1 Jefferson Street Project; and Do not approve the re -budgeting of $1,844,030 in Infrastructure funds allocated to Phase 1 Jefferson Street Project into infrastructure reserves to be used for other eligible projects; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectively submitted, John M . Falconer Finance Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese City Manager Attachments: 1. Map of Jefferson St Phase 1 with Project Area 1 and 2 2. Project Improvements for Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project i0" v RESOLUTION NO.2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445(a) WHEREAS, the City Council on July 20, 1999 approved the Five Year Capital Improvement Project as part of the FY 1999/2000 budget which approved proceeding with improvements to Phase 1 of the Jefferson Street Improvements ("Jefferson Street Improvements"), all of which are publicly owned improvements; WHEREAS, the Jefferson Street Improvements are located in the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency's Project Area land 2, and will enhance the public's use within Project Area 1 and 2; WHEREAS, there is inadequate funding available from La Quinta Redevelopment Agency's Project Area 2 to proceed with the Jefferson Street Improvements at this point in time in Project Area 2; WHEREAS, the funding for the Jefferson Street Improvements is not otherwise available at this time; WHEREAS, it would be in the best interest of the public for the Jefferson Street Improvements to be installed at this point in time; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a), the City Council finds that: (a) That the Jefferson Street Improvements will be of benefit to the Project Area 1, to the area surrounding Project Area 1, and to the immediate neighborhood in which the Jefferson Street Improvements will be located. (b) That no other reasonable means of financing the Jefferson Street Improvements in Project Area 2 are available to the community at this time, and that the RDA Capital Improvement Project No. 2 fund currently does not have sufficient funds to pay for the construction, and will not accumulate sufficient funds for that purpose within the near future. Nor are the funds otherwise available from other sources. (c) That the payment of funds for the construction of the Jefferson Street Improvements will assist in the elimination of one or more blighting conditions inside the project area and is consistent with the implementation plan adopted pursuant to Section 33490. (d) That the construction of the Jefferson Street Improvements are consistent with the implementation plan adopted pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 33490, in that the Jefferson Street Improvements were identified as Street/Drainage Improvements I.G. SECTION 2. The City Council therefore consents to the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency funding of the improvement costs of the Jefferson Street Improvements in Project Area 2 with La Quinta Redevelopment Agency Project Area 1 funds. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 19th day of February, 2002, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Council Members NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: JUKE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON , City Attorney City of La Quinta, California JOHN L. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 10 -2- � - G. iv 6 ■ ■ ATTACHMENT 1 _ _ _ __ _____ Q City of La uin to FRED WARING DR Redevelopment Map MILES AVE WESTWARD HO DR > -In J —Z 4GHWAY 111 ■ 8 8AVE TH AVE # TH RDA #2 � J-- J- ;0 7T7 (n 0 0 1z j RDA #1 0 50TH AVE 0 z fn 52ND AVE Legend RDA Areas - NOT RDA =mamma RDA# 1 RDA# 2 Streets Phases — Jefferson St. Phase 1 53RD AVE 54TH AVE 'JAIRPORT BLV ,,OSSEO% ■ 58TH AVE ATTACHMENT 2 COST ESTIMATE Project No.99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project La Quinta - (Medians A, B, D, and E) ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT EXTENDED NO. PRICE PRICE 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 3 Clear and Grub existing plantings - (shrubs and irrigation) SF 100,459 $ 0.12 $ 12,055.08 4 Remove existing tree per plans, details and specifications, EA 5 $ 100.00 $ 500.00 (Crape Myrtles 8' average) 5 Remove existing unclassified material/soil CY 56 $ 15.00 $ 840.00 Furnish and install fill material to replace unclassified 6 material/ soil removed as described in Section 3000. (2" CY 56 $ 15.00 $ 840.00 depth — fill to 3" of top of curb) Furnish and install fill material (of "like" consistency to existing soil type), create berms with maximum height of 7 12" per plans and specifications, and make final adjusments CY 4,054 $ 15.00 $ 60,810.00 to berms per Landscape Architect (item shall include all materials and labor necessary for the construction of landscaped berms) 8 Furnish and install stamped concrete per plans, details and specifications SF 507 $ 8.00 $ 4,056.00 9 Furnish and install 3" — 8" diameter "Sun Pebbles" per TN 120 $ 55.00 $ 6,600.00 plans, details and specifications 10 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 4 x 4 x 4 per .TN 25 $ 165.00 $ 4,125.00 plans details and specifications 11 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 3 x 3 x 3 per plans details and specifications TN 48 $ 75.00 $ 3,600.00 12 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 2 x 3 x 2 per TN 42 $ 44.00 $ 1,848.00 plans details and specifications 13 Furnish and install "Desert Gold" fines 2" thick per plans TN 19266 $ 55.00 $ 69,630.00 and specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 14 (I1D) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller and electric EA 2 $ 7,000.00 $ 14,000.00 meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 15 (1ID) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller CCU and EA 0 $ 9,000.00 $ - electric meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications 16 Furnish and install superior electric remote control master EA 3 $ 250.00 $ 750.00 valve per plans, details and specifications 17 Furnish and install pressure regulator per plans, details and EA 3 $ 250.00 specifications $ 750.00 18 lFumish and install 3/a" Nibco ball valve EA 10 $ 100.00 $ 1,000.00 Furnish and install 3/a" electric remote control valve 19 assembly and wiring with pressure regulator and filter per EA 18 $ 200.00 $ 3,600.00 details, plans and specifications 20 Furnish and install 1" Rainbird Model 44 LRC quick coupling valve per detail and specifications EA 23 $ 65.00 $ 1,495.00 Iz0- COST ESTIMATE Project No.99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project La Quinta - (Medians A, B, D, and E) ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTy, UNIT EXTENDED NO. PRICE PRICE 21 Furnish and install flow sensor and wire to controllers per EA 3 $ 100.00 $ 300.00 details and specifications Furnish and install Bowsmith "SL" series drip emitter 1.0 22 gph on riser per plans, details, and specifications EA 69 $ 8.00 $ 552.00 23 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SU series drip emitter 2.0 EA 929 $ 8.00 $ 7,432.00 gph on Vh" riser per plans, details, and specifications Furnish and install Bowsmith "SU series drip emitter .6 gph 24 on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications EA 55 $ 8.00 $ 440.00 Furnish and install - 2 gph bubbler per palm location per 25 detail in deep watering pipe EA 194 $ 30.00 $ 5,820.00 26 Furnish and install flush valve per plans, details and EA 36 $ 100.00 $ 3,600.00 specifications Furnish and install - 2 gph bubbler per tree location per 27 detail in deep watering pipe EA 258 $ 45.00 $ 11,610.00 Furnish and install Backflow Prevention Device per plans 28 and specifications EA 0 $ 800.00 $ - 29 Furnish and install 1 V2" SCH 40 PVC mainline per plans, LF 9,247 $ 3.00 $ 27,741.00 details and specifications Furnish and install 3/a" SCH 40 PVC lateral line per plans 30 and specifications LF 30,727 $ 1.00 $ 30,727.00 Furnish and install 7' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, 31 skinned - includes backfill and fertilizer EA 18 $ 400.00 $ 7,200.00 32 Furnish and install I F brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 15 $ 500.00 $ 7,500.00 skinned - includes backfill and fertilizer 33 Furnish and install 15' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 0 $ 700.00 $ - skinned -includes backfill and fertilizer 34 Furnish and install 24" Box Mediterranean Fan Palm EA 14 $ 350.00 $ 4,900.00 35 Furnish and install 4' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 9 $ 800.00 $ 7,200.00 36 Furnish and install 7' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 9 $ 1,200.00 $ 10,800.00 37 Furnish and install 36" Box Blue Palo Verde EA 9 $ 650.00 $ 5,850.00 38 Furnish and install 36" Box Jacaranda EA 15 $ 650.00 $ 9,750.00 39 Furnish and install 24" Box California Pepper EA 10 $ 325.00 $ 3,250.00 40 Furnish and install 24" Box Orchid Tree EA 20 $ 325.00 $ 6,500.00 41 Furnish and install 24" Box Acacia EA 14 $ 325.00 $ 4,550.00 42 Furnish and install 5 gallon Barbados Pride EA 60 $ 25.00 $ 1,500.00 43 Furnish and install 5 gallon Thunder Cloud EA 109 $ 25.00 $ 2,725.00 44 Furnish and install 5 gallon Desert Cassia EA 110 $ 25.00 $ 2,750.00 45 Furnish and install 8 cane Ocotillo EA 56 $ 70.00 $ 3,920.00 46 Furnish and install Golden Barrel Cactus 10" diameter EA 0 $ 75.00 $ - 47 Furnish and install 5 gallon Fairy Duster EA 20 $ 8.00 $ 160.00 48 Furnish and install 1 gallon Autumn Sage EA 108 $ 8.00 $ 864.00 49 Furnish and install 1 gallon Red Yucca EA 69 $ 8.00 $ 552.00 50 Furnish and install 1 gallon New Gold Lantana EA 215 $ 8.00 $ 1,720.00 51 Furnish and install 1 gallon Purple Lantana EA 89 $ 8.00 $ 712.00 52 Furnish and install 1 gallon Baccharis EA 200 $ 8.00 $ 1,600.00 53 Branch Circuit Trench FT 9,335 $ 1.03 $ 9,615.05 1� COST ESTIMATE Project No.99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project La Quinta - (Medians A, B, D, and E) ITEM NO.CE DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. PRUNIT EXPENDED 54 Backfill BC Trench FT 9,335 $ 0.62 $ 5,787.70 55 Service Lateral Trench FT 100 $ 1.11 $ 111.00 56 Backfill Service Lateral Trench FT 100 $ 0.41 $ 41.00 57 (1) 4" Service Lateral Conduit FT 100 $ 9.58 $ 958.00 58 2#10 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 15 $ 3.50 $ 52.50 59 14#10 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 275 $ 4.29 $ 1,179.75 60 2#8 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 270 $ 6.34 $ 1,711.80 61 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 165 $ 5.59 $ 922.35 62 6#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 3,360 $ 4.60 $ 15,456.00 63 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 1,475 $ 3.34 $ 4,926.50 64 4#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 195 $ 3.97 $ 774.15 65 2#84#10 1#12GRD 1"Conduit FT 890 $ 6.71 $ 5,971.90 66 2#8 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1"Conduit FT 355 $ 7.34 $ 2,605.70 67 4#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 2,415 $ 6.22 $ 15,021.30 68 2#8 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 2,475 $ 5.09 $ 12,597.75 69 2#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 155 $ 5.43 $ 841.65 70 2#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 1,210 $ 4.13 $ 4,997.30 71 2#8 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 40 $ 5.72 $ 228.80 72 2#8 1 # 12GRD 1 /2"Conduit FT 1,060 $ 3.79 $ 4,017.40 73 2#10 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 725 $ 6.06 $ 4,393.50 74 4#8 2#10 2#12 1#12GRD I"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 75 4#8 2#10 1#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 76 Fixture "A" EA 128 $ 550.03 $ 70,403.84 77 Fixture "B" EA 35 $ 361.27 $ 12,644.45 78 Fixture "C" EA 0 79 Receptacles EA 26 $ 76.79 $ 1,996.54 80 Meter Pedestal EA 2 $ 4,837.40 $ 9,674.80 81 CB 20-40Amp/l&2 IOKAIC EA 49 $ 85.95 $ 4,211.55 82 Ground Rod EA 2 $ 88.91 $ 177.82 83 Lighting Contactors (20AMP) EA 2 $ 213.98 $ 427.96 84 Photocell EA 2 $ 70.88 $ 141.76 85 Time Clock EA 2 $ 295.09 $ 590.18 86 Christy Pullboxes EA 170 $ 73.42 $ 12,481.40 87 Pullboxes EA 12 $ 161.07 $ 1,932.84 88 Miscellaneous Electrical Utilization Equipment LS 1 $ 20,666.60 $ 20,666.60 89 Provide a I year maintenance for all planting, irrigation and electrical/lighting elements in the project area. Guidelines provided by the City maintenance department and attached forms LS 1 $ 13,800.00 $ 13,800.00 Sub Total: 10% Contingency TOTAL: $ 618,084.92 $ 61,808.49 $ 679,893.41 U .L 1 COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project Round About - (Median C) I OM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXPENDED CE 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 3 Clear and Grub existing plantings - (shrubs and irrigation) SF 25,700 $ 0.12 $ 3,084.00 4 Remove existing tree per plans, details and specifications, EA 0 $ 100.00 $ - (Crape Myrtles 8' average) 5 Remove existing unclassified material/soil CY 0 $ 15.00 $ - Furnish and install fill material to replace unclassified 6 material/ soil removed as described in Section 3000. (2" CY 0 $ 15.00 $ - depth — fill to 3" of top of curb) Furnish and install fill material (of "like" consistency to existing soil type), create berms with maximum height of 7 12" per plans and specifications, and make final adjusments CY 302 $ 15.00 $ 4,530.00 to berms per Landscape Architect (item shall include all materials and labor necessary for the construction of landscape berms) 8 Furnish and install stamped concrete per plans, details and SF 2,243 $ 8.00 $ 17,944.00 specifications 9 Furnish and install 3" — 8" diameter "Sun Pebbles" per TN 0 $ 55.00 $ - plans, details and specifications 10 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 4 x 4 x 4 per TN 4 $ 165.00 $ 660.00 plans details and specifications 11 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 3 x 3 x 3 per TN 16 $ 75.00 $ 1,200.00 plans details and specifications 12 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 2 x 3 x 2 per TN 4 $ 44.00 $ 176.00 plans details and specifications 13 Furnish and install "Desert Gold" fines 2" thick per plans TN 257 $ 55.00 $ 14,135.00 and specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 14 (IID) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller and electric EA 0 $ 7,000.00 $ - meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 15 (IID) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller CCU and EA 0 $ 9,000.00 $ - electric meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications 16 Furnish and install superior electric remote control master EA 0 $ 250.00 $ - valve per plans, details and specifications Furnish and install pressure regulator per plans, details and 17 specifications EA 0 $ 250.00 $ - 18 Furnish and install 3/a" Nibco ball valve EA 8 $ 100.00 $ 800.00 Furnish and install 3/4" electric remote control valve 19 assembly and wiring with pressure regulator and filter per EA 4 $ 200.00 $ 800.00 details, plans and specifications 20 Furnish and install 1" Rainbird Model 44 LRC quick EA 6 $ 65.00 $ 390.00 coupling valve per detail and specifications 11J tU AL io COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project Round About - (Median C) ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXPENDED NO.CE 21 Furnish and install flow sensor and wire to controllers per EA 0 $ 100.00 $ - details and specifications 22 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SU series drip emitter 1.0 EA 44 $ 8.00 $ 352.00 gph on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications 23 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SU series drip emitter 2.0 EA 86 $ 8.00 $ 688.00 gph on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications Furnish and install Bowsmith "SL" series drip emitter .6 gph 24 on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications EA 40 $ 8.00 $ 320.00 25 Furnish and install - 2 gph bubbler per palm location per EA 24 $ 30.00 $ 720.00 detail in deep watering pipe 26 Furnish and install flush valve per plans, details and EA 7 $ 100.00 $ 700.00 specifications 27 Furnish and install - 2 gph bubbler per tree location per EA 12 $ 45.00 $ 540.00 detail in deep watering pipe 28 Furnish and install Backflow Prevention Device per plans LF 0 $ 800.00 $ - and specifications Furnish and install 1 'h" SCH 40 PVC mainline per plans, 29 details and specifications LF 740 $ 3.00 $ 2,220.00 30 Furnish and install 3/a" SCH 40 PVC lateral line per plans LF 2,630 $ 1.00 $ 2,630.00 and specifications 31 Furnish and install 7' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 0 $ 400.00 $ - skinned - includes backfill and fertilizer 32 Furnish and install I F brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 0 $ 500.00 $ - skinned - includes backfill and fertilizer 33 Furnish and install 15' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 15 $ 700.00 $ 10,500.00 skinned -includes backfill and fertilizer 34 Furnish and install 24" Box Mediterranean Fan Palm EA 4 $ 350.00 $ 1,400.00 35 Furnish and install 4' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 0 $ 800.00 $ - 36 Furnish and install.7' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 0 $ 1,200.00 $ - 37 Furnish and install 36" Box Blue Palo Verde EA 4 $ 650.00 $ 2,600.00 38 Furnish and install 36" Box Jacaranda EA 0 $ 650.00 $ - 39 Furnish and install 24" Box California Pepper EA 0 $ 325.00 $ - 40 Furnish and install 24" Box Orchid Tree EA 0 $ 325.00 $ - 41 Furnish and install 24" Box Acacia EA 0 $ 325.00 $ - 42 Furnish and install 5 gallon Barbados Pride EA 36 $ 25.00 $ 900.00 43 Furnish and install 5 gallon Thunder Cloud EA 0 $ 25.00 $ - 44 Furnish and install gallon Desert Cassia EA 8 $ 25.00 $ 200.00 45 Furnish and install 8 cane Ocotillo EA 16 $ 70.00 $ 1,120.00 46 Furnish and install Golden Barrel Cactus 10" diameter EA 24 $ 75.00 $ 1,800.00 47 Furnish and install gallon Fairy Duster EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - 48 Furnish and install I gallon Autumn Sage EA 20 $ 8.00 $ 160.00 49 Furnish and install 1 gallon Red Yucca EA 44 $ 8.00 $ 352.00 50 Furnish and install 1 gallon New Gold Lantana EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - 51 Furnish and install 1 gallon Purple Lantana EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - 52 Furnish and install 1 gallon Baccharis EA 22 $ 8.00 $ 176.00 53 Branch Circuit Trench FT 900 $ 1.03 $ 927.00 54 JBackfill BC Trench FT 900 $ 0.62 $ 558.00 COST ESTIMATE Project no. "-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project Round About - (Median C) ITEM NO.DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXPTREINDED CE 55 Service Lateral Trench FT 0 $ - $ - 56 Backfill Service Lateral Trench FT 0 $ - $ - 57 (1) 4" Service Lateral Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 58 2#10 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 59 14#10 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 60 2#8 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 61 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 62 6#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 63 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 455 $ 3.34 $ 1,519.70 64 4#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 320 $ 3.97 $ 1,270.40 65 2#84#10 1#12GRD 1"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 66 2#8 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 67 4#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 68 2#8 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 69 2#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 70 2#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 71 2#8 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 72 2#8 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 73 2#10 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 74 4#8 2#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 75 4#8 2#10 1#12GRD 1"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 76 Fixture "A" EA 0 $ - $ - 77 Fixture "B" EA 8 $ 361.27 $ 2,890.16 78 Fixture "C" EA 4 $ 361.27 $ 1,445.08 79 Receptacles EA 1 $ 76.79 $ 76.79 80 Meter Pedestal EA 0 $ - $ - 81 CB 20-40Amp/1&2 10KAIC EA 0 $ - $ - 82 Ground Rod EA 0 $ - $ - 83 Lighting Contactors (20AMP) EA 0 $ - $ - 84 Photocell EA 0 $ - $ - 85 1 Time Clock EA 0 $ - $ - 86 Christy Pullboxes EA 9 $ 73.42 $ 660.78 87 Pullboxes EA 2 $ 161.07 $ 322.14 88 Miscellaneous Electrical Utilization Equipment LS 1 $ 967.22 $ 967.22 89 Provide a 1 year maintenance for all planting, irrigation and electrical/lighting elements in the project area. Guidelines provided by the City maintenance department and attached forms LS 1 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 Sub Total: 10% Contingency TOTAL: $ 93,234.27 $ 9,323.43 $ 102,557.70 u.` k_ COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project (Median F) TEMO. IRICE DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXPTEENDED 1 Mobilization LS 0 $ - $ - 2 Traffic Control LS 0 $ - $ - 3 Clear and Grub existing plantings - (shrubs and irrigation) SF 0 $ - $ - 4 Remove existing tree per plans, details and specifications, EA 0 $ (Crape Myrtles 8' average)- 5 Remove existing unclassified material/soil CY 0 $ - $ - Furnish and install fill material to replace unclassified 6 material/ soil removed as described in Section 3000. (2" CY 0 $ - $ - depth — fill to 3" of top of curb) Furnish and install fill material (of "like" consistency to existing soil type), create berms with maximum height of 7 12" per plans and specifications, and make final adjusments CY 0 $ - $ to berms per Landscape Architect (item shall include all materials and labor necessary for the construction of landscaped berms) 8 Furnish and install stamped concrete per plans, details and SF 0 $ - $ - specifications 9 Furnish and install 3" — 8" diameter "Sun Pebbles" per TN 0 $ - $ - plans, details and specifications 10 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 4 x 4 x 4 per TN 0 $ - $ - plans details and specifications 11 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 3 x 3 x 3 per TN 0 $ - $ - plans details and specifications 12 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 2 x 3 x 2 per TN 0 $ - $ - plans details and specifications 13 Furnish and install "Desert Gold" fines 2" thick per plans TN 0 $ - $ - and specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 14 (IID) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller and electric EA 0 $ - $ - meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 15 (IID) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller CCU and EA 0 $ - $ - electric meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications 16 Furnish and install superior electric remote control master EA 0 $ - $ - valve per plans, details and specifications 17 Furnish and install pressure regulator per plans, details and EA 0 $ - $ - specifications 18 Furnish and install W Nibco ball valve EA 0 $ - $ - Furnish and install ;/a" electric remote control valve 19 assembly and wiring with pressure regulator and filter per EA 0 $ - $ - details, plans and specifications 20 Furnish and install 1" Rainbird Model 44 LRC quick EA 0 $ - $ - coupling valve per detail and specifications 11 COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project (Median F) ITEM NO.CE DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY, UNIT PRICE EXPENDED 21 Furnish and install flow sensor and wire to controllers per EA 0 $ - $ - details and specifications 22 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SU series drip emitter 1.0 EA 0 $ - $ - gph on W riser per plans, details, and specifications 23 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SL" series drip emitter 2.0 EA 0 $ - $ - gph on 1/2" riser per plans, details, and specifications 24 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SU series drip emitter .6 gph EA 0 $ - $ - on 1/2" riser per plans, details, and specifications 25 Furnish and install — 2 gph bubbler per palm location per EA 0 $ - $ - detail in deep watering pipe 26 Furnish and install flush valve per plans, details and EA 0 $ - $ - specifications 27 Furnish and install — 2 gph bubbler per tree location per EA 0 $ - $ - detail in deep watering pipe 28 Furnish and install Backflow Prevention Device per plans LF 0 $ - $ - and specifications 29 Furnish and install 1 1/2" SCH 40 PVC mainline per plans, LF 0 $ - $ - details and specifications 30 Furnish and install 3/a" SCH 40 PVC lateral line per plans LF 0 $ - $ - and specifications 31 Furnish and install 7' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 0 $ - $ - skinned — includes backfill and fertilizer 32 Furnish and install I V brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 0 $ - $ - skinned — includes backfill and fertilizer 33 Furnish and install 15' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 0 $ - $ - skinned -includes backfill and fertilizer 34 Furnish and install 24" Box Mediterranean Fan Palm EA 0 $ - $ - 35 Furnish and install 4' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 0 $ - $ - 36 Furnish and install 7' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 0 $ - $ - 37 Furnish and install 36" Box Blue Palo Verde EA 0 $ - $ - 38 Furnish and install 36" Box Jacaranda EA 0 $ - $ - 39 Furnish and install 24" Box California Pepper EA 0 $ - $ - 40 Furnish and install 24" Box Orchid Tree EA 0 $ - $ - 41 Furnish and install 24" Box Acacia EA 0 $ - $ - 42 Furnish and install 5 gallon Barbados Pride EA 0 $ - $ - 43 Furnish and install 5 gallon Thunder Cloud EA 0 $ - $ - 44 Furnish and install 5 gallon Desert Cassia EA 0 $ - $ - 45 Furnish and install 8 cane Ocotillo EA 0 $ - $ - 46 Furnish and install Golden Barrel Cactus 10" diameter EA 0 $ - $ - 47 Furnish and install 5 gallon Fairy Duster EA 0 $ - $ - 48 Furnish and install 1 gallon Autumn Sage EA 0 $ - $ - 49 Furnish and install 1 gallon Red Yucca EA 0 $ - $ - 50 Furnish and install 1 gallon New Gold Lantana EA 0 $ - $ - 51 Furnish and install 1 gallon Purple Lantana EA 0 $ - $ - 52 Furnish and install 1 gallon Baccharis EA 0 $ - $ - 53 Branch Circuit Trench FT 0 $ - $ - 54 JBackfill BC Trench FT 0 $ - $ - 11 Ul COST ESTIMATE Project no. "-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project (Median F) I oM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXPENDED CE 55 Service Lateral Trench FT 0 $ - $ - 56 1 Backfill Service Lateral Trench FT 0 $ - $ - 57 (1) 4" Service Lateral Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 58 2#101#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 59 4#101#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 60 2#8 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 61 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 62 6#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 63 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 64 4#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 65 2#8 4#10 1#12GRD 1 ".Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 66 2#8 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 67 4#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 68 2#8 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 69 2#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 70 2#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 71 2#8 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 72 2#8 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 73 2#10 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 74 4#8 2#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 75 4#8 2#10 1#12GRD l "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 76 Fixture "A" EA 0 $ - $ - 77 Fixture "B" EA 0 $ - $ - 78 Fixture "C" EA 0 $ - 79 Receptacles EA 0 $ - $ - 80 Meter Pedestal EA 0 $ - $ - 81 JCB 20-40Amp/1&2 10KAIC EA 0 $ - $ - 82 Ground Rod EA 0 $ - $ - 83 Lighting Contactors (20AMP) EA 0 $ - $ - 84 Photocell EA 0 $ - $ - 85 Time Clock EA 0 $ - $ - 86 Christy Pullboxes EA 0 $ - $ - 87 Pullboxes EA 0 $ - $ - 88 Miscellaneous Electrical Utilization Equipment LS 0 $ - $ - 89 Provide a I year maintenance for all planting, irrigation and electrical/lighting elements in the project area. Guidelines provided by the City maintenance department and attached forms LS 0 $ - $ - Sub Total: 10% Contingency TOTAL: $ - $ - $ - 11� U 1'7 COST ESTIMATE Project no. "-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project (Median G) I oM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXPENDED CE 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 3 Clear and Grub existing plantings - (shrubs and irrigation) SF 400 $ 0.12 $ 48.00 4 Remove existing tree per plans, details and specifications, EA 0 $ - $ - (Crape Myrtles 8' average) 5 lRemove existing unclassified material/soil CY 4 $ 15.00 $ 60.00 Furnish and install fill material to replace unclassified 6 material/ soil removed as described in Section 3000. (2" CY 4 $ 15.00 $ 60.00 depth — fill to 3" of top of curb) Furnish and install fill material (of "like" consistency to existing soil type), create berms with maximum height of 7 12" per plans and specifications, and make final adjusments CY 0 $ - $ to berms per Landscape Architect (item shall include all materials and labor necessary for the construction of landscaped berms) 8 Furnish and install stamped concrete per plans, details and SF 91 $ 8.00 $ 728.00 specifications 9 Furnish and install 3" — 8" diameter "Sun Pebbles" per TN 0 $ - $ - plans, details and specifications 10 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 4 x 4 x 4 per TN 0 $ $ plans details and specifications 11 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 3 x 3 x 3 per TN 1 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 plans details and specifications 12 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 2 x 3 x 2 per TN 1 $ 44.00 $ 44.00 plans details and specifications 13 Furnish and install "Desert Gold" fines 2" thick per plans TN 4 $ 55.00 $ 220.00 and specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 14 (IID) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller and electric EA 0 $ - $ - meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 15 (IID) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller CCU and EA 0 $ - $ - electric meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications 16 Furnish and install superior electric remote control master EA 0 $ - $ - valve per plans, details and specifications 17 Furnish and install pressure regulator per plans, details and EA 0 $ - $ - specifications 18 Furnish and install W Nibco ball valve EA 0 $ - $ - Furnish and install 3/a" electric remote control valve 19 assembly and wiring with pressure regulator and filter per EA 1 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 details, plans and specifications 20 Furnish and install 1" Rainbird Model 44 LRC quick EA 1 $ 65.00 $ 65.00 coupling valve per detail and specifications 11q Ul1 8 COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project (Median G) ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXTENDED PRICE 21 Furnish and install flow sensor and wire to controllers per details and specifications EA 0 $ - $ - 22 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SL" series drip emitter 1.0 gph on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications EA 0 $ - $ - 23 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SL" series drip emitter 2.0 gph on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications EA 6 $ 8.00 $ 48.00 24 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SU series drip emitter .6 gph on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications EA 0 $ - $ 25 Furnish and install — 2 gph bubbler per palm location per detail in deep watering pipe EA 0 $ - $ - 26 Furnish and install flush valve per plans, details and specifications EA 0 $ - $ - 27 Furnish and install — 2 gph bubbler per tree location per detail in deep watering pipe EA 0 $ - $ - 28 Furnish and install Backflow Prevention Device per plans and specifications LF 0 $ - $ - 29 Furnish and install 1 1/z" SCH 40 PVC mainline per plans, details and specifications LF 748 $ 3.00 $ 2,244.00 30 Furnish and install 3/a" SCH 40 PVC lateral line per plans and specifications LF 50 $ 1.00 $ 50.00 31 Furnish and install 7' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, skinned — includes backfill and fertilizer EA 1 $ 400.00 $ 400.00 32 Furnish and install I F brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, skinned — includes backfill and fertilizer EA 1 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 33 Furnish and install 15' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, skinned -includes backfill and fertilizer EA 0 $ - $ - 34 Furnish and install 24" Box Mediterranean Fan Palm EA 0 $ - $ - 35 Furnish and install 4' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 0 $ - $ - 36 Furnish and install 7' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 0 $ - $ - 37 Furnish and install 36" Box Blue Palo Verde EA 0 $ - $ - 38 Furnish and install 36" Box Jacaranda EA 0 $ - $ - 39 Furnish and install 24" Box California Pepper EA 0 $ - $ - 40 Furnish and install 24" Box Orchid Tree EA 0 $ - $ - 41 Furnish and install 24" Box Acacia EA 0 $ - $ - 42 Furnish and install 5 gallon Barbados Pride EA 0 $ - $ - 43 Furnish and install 5 gallon Thunder Cloud EA 0 $ - 44 Furnish and install 5 gallon Desert Cassia EA 0 $ - 45 Furnish and install 8 cane Ocotillo EA 0 $ - 46 Furnish and install Golden Barrel Cactus 10" diameter EA 0 $ - 47 Furnish and install 5 gallon Fairy Duster EA 0 $ - 48 Furnish and install 1 gallon Autumn Sage EA 0 $ - 49 Furnish and install 1 gallon Red Yucca EA 0 $ - 50 Furnish and install 1 gallon New Gold Lantana EA 0 $ - 51 Furnish and install 1 gallon Purple Lantana EA 0 $ - 52 Furnish and install 1 gallon Baccharis EA 8 $ 8.00 $ 64.00 53 Branch Circuit Trench 0 $ - $ _ 54 Backfill BC Trench FT 0 $ _ $ _ 1 `) 0 ti . J COST ESTIMATE Project no. "-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project (Median G) I OM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXTENDED CE 55 Service Lateral Trench FT 0 $ - $ - 56 Backfill Service Lateral Trench FT 0 $ - $ - 57 (1) 4" Service Lateral Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 58 2#10 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 59 4#10 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 60 2#8 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 61 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 62 6#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 63 12#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 64 4#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 65 2#8 4#10 1#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 66 2#8 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 67 4#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 68 2#8 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 69 2#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 70 2#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 71 2#8 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 72 2#8 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 73 2#10 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 74 4#8 2#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 75 4#8 2#10 1#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 76 IFixture "A" EA 0 $ - $ - 77 Fixture "B" EA 0 $ - $ - 78 Fixture "C" EA 0 $ - 79 Receptacles EA 0 $ - $ - 80 Meter Pedestal EA 0 $ - $ - 81 CB 20-40Amp/1&2 10KAIC EA 0 $ - $ - 82 Ground Rod EA 0 $ - $ - 83 Lighting Contactors (20AMP) EA 0 $ - $ - 84 Photocell EA 0 $ - $ - 85 Time Clock EA 0 $ - $ - 86 Christy Pullboxes EA 0 $ - $ - 87 Pullboxes EA 0 $ - $ - 88 Miscellaneous Electrical Utilization Equipment LS 1 $ - 89 Provide a 1 year maintenance for all planting, irrigation and electrical/lighting elements in the project area. Guidelines provided by the City maintenance department and attached forms LS 1 $ 2,400.00 $ 2,400.00 Sub Total: 10% Contingency TOTAL: $ 10,206.00 $ 1,020.60 $ 11,226.60 l ow COST ESTIMATE Project no. "-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project (Median I) ITEM NO.CE DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXTENDED 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ _ $ _ 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $ - $ _ 3 Clear and Grub existing plantings - (shrubs and irrigation) SF 0 $ - $ - 4 Remove existing tree per plans, details and specifications, EA 0 $ - $ - (Crape Myrtles 8' average) 5 Remove existing unclassified material/soil CY 0 $ - $ - Furnish and install fill material to replace unclassified 6 material/ soil removed as described in Section 3000. (2" CY 0 $ - $ - depth — fill to 3" of top of curb) Furnish and install fill material (of "like" consistency to existing soil type), create berms with maximum height of 7 12" per plans and specifications, and make final adjusments CY 0 $ - $ _ to berms per Landscape Architect (item shall include all materials and labor necessary for the construction of landscaped berms) 8 Furnish and install stamped concrete per plans, details and SF 0 $ - $ - specifications 9 Furnish and install 3" — 8" diameter "Sun Pebbles" per TN 0 $ - $ - plans, details and specifications 10 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 4 x 4 x 4 per TN 0 $ - $ - plans details and specifications 11 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 3 x 3 x 3 per TN 0 $ $ - plans details and specifications 12 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 2 x 3 x 2 per TN 0 $ - $ - plans details and specifications 13 Furnish and install "Desert Gold" fines 2" thick per plans TN 0 $ - $ - and specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 14 (IID) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller and electric EA 0 $ - $ - meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 15 (IID) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller CCU and EA 0 $ - $ - electric meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications 16 Furnish and install superior electric remote control master EA 0 $ - $ - valve per plans, details and specifications 17 Furnish and install pressure regulator per plans, details and EA 0 $ - $ - specifications 18 Furnish and install 3/a" Nibco ball valve EA 0 $ - $ - Furnish and install 3/a" electric remote control valve 19 assembly and wiring with pressure regulator and filter per EA 0 $ - $ - details, plans and specifications 20 Furnish and install 1" Rainbird Model 44 LRC quick EA 0 $ - $ - coupling valve per detail and specifications 19 ) f.., .,, COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project (Median IT) ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXTENDED NO.PRICE 21 Furnish and install flow sensor and wire to controllers per EA 0 $ - $ - details and specifications 22 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SU series drip emitter 1.0 EA 0 $ - $ - gph on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications 23 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SU series drip emitter 2.0 EA 0 $ - $ - gph on'/s" riser per plans, details, and specifications 24 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SU series drip emitter .6 gph EA 0 $ - $ - on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications 25 Furnish and install — 2 gph bubbler per palm location per EA 0 $ - $ - detail in deep watering pipe 26 Furnish and install flush valve per plans, details and EA 0 $ - $ - specifications 27 Furnish and install — 2 gph bubbler per tree location per EA 0 $ - $ - detail in deep watering pipe 28 Furnish and install Backflow Prevention Device per plans LF 0 $ - $ - and specifications 29 Furnish and install 1 '/z" SCH 40 PVC mainline per plans, LF 0 $ - $ - details and specifications 30 Furnish and install 3/a" SCH 40 PVC lateral line per plans LF 0 $ - $ - and specifications 31 Furnish and install 7' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 0 $ - $ - skinned — includes backfill and fertilizer 32 Furnish and install 11' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 0 $ - $ - skinned — includes backfill and fertilizer 33 Furnish and install 15' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 0 $ - $ - skinned -includes backfill and fertilizer 34 Furnish and install 24" Box Mediterranean Fan Palm EA 0 $ - $ - 35 Furnish and install 4' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 0 $ - $ - 36 Furnish and install 7' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 0 $ - $ - 37 Furnish and install 36" Box Blue Palo Verde EA 0 $ - $ - 38 Furnish and install 36" Box Jacaranda EA 0 $ - $ - 39 Furnish and install 24" Box California Pepper EA 0 $ - $ - 40 Furnish and install 24" Box Orchid Tree EA 0 $ - $ - 41 Furnish and install 24" Box Acacia EA 0 $ - $ - 42 Furnish and install 5 gallon Barbados Pride EA 0 $ - $ - 43 Furnish and install 5 gallon Thunder Cloud EA 0 $ - $ - 44 Furnish and install 5 gallon Desert Cassia EA 0 $ - $ - 45 Furnish and install 8 cane Ocotillo EA 0 $ - $ - 46 Furnish and install Golden Barrel Cactus 10" diameter EA 0 $ - $ - 47 Furnish and install 5 gallon Fairy Duster EA 0 $ - $ - 48 Furnish and install 1 gallon Autumn Sage EA 0 $ - $ - 49 Furnish and install 1 gallon Red Yucca EA 0 $ - $ - 50 Furnish and install l gallon New Gold Lantana EA 0 $ - $ - 51 Furnish and install 1 gallon Purple Lantana EA 0 $ - $ - 52 Furnish and install 1 gallon Baccharis EA 0 $ - $ - 53 Branch Circuit Trench FT 0 $ - $ - 54 JBackfill BC Trench FT 0 $ - $ - 1 �> U *'W ow COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project (Median H) ITEM NO.CE DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXTENDED 55 Service Lateral Trench FT 0 $ - $ - 56 1 Backfill Service Lateral Trench FT 0 $ - $ - 57 (1) 4" Service Lateral Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 58 2#101#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 59 4#10 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 60 2#8 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 61 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 62 6#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 63 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 64 4#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 65 2#84#10 1#12GRD 1"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 66 2#8 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 67 4#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 68 2#8 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 69 2#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 70 2#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 71 2#8 4#12 1 # 12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 72 2#8 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 73 2#10 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 74 4#8 2#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 75 4#8 2#10 1#12GRD 1"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 76 Fixture "A" EA 0 $ - $ - 77 Fixture "B" EA 0 $ - $ - 78 Fixture "C" EA 0 79 Receptacles EA 0 $ - $ - 80 Meter Pedestal EA 0 $ - $ - 81 CB 20-40Amp/1&2 10KAIC EA 0 $ - $ - 82 Ground Rod EA 0 $ - $ - 83 Lighting Contactors (20AMP) EA 0 $ - $ - 84 Photocell EA 0 $ - $ - 85 Time Clock EA 0 $ - $ - 86 Christy Pullboxes EA 0 $ - $ - 87 Pullboxes EA 0 $ - $ - 88 Miscellaneous Electrical Utilization Equipment LS 0 $ - $ - 89 Provide a 1 year maintenance for all planting, irrigation and electrical/lighting elements in the project area. Guidelines provided by the City maintenance department and attached Forms LS 0 $ - $ - Sub Total: 10% Contingency TOTAL: $ - $ - $ - COST ESTIMATE Project no. "-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project (Median I) ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXTENDED NO.PRICE 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 3 Clear and Grub existing plantings - (shrubs and irrigation) SF 17,212 $ 0.12 $ 2,065.44 4 Remove existing tree per plans, details and specifications, EA 0 $ 100.00 $ - (Crape Myrtles 8' average) 5 Remove existing unclassified material/soil CY 95 $ 15.00 $ 1,425.00 Furnish and install fill material to replace unclassified 6 material/ soil removed as described in Section 3000. (2" CY 95 $ 15.00 $ 1,425.00 depth — fill to 3" of top of curb) Furnish and install fill material (of "like" consistency to existing soil type), create berms with maximum height of 7 12" per plans and specifications, and make final adjusments CY 119 $ 15.00 $ 1,785.00 to berms per Landscape Architect (item shall include all materials and labor necessary for the construction of landscaped berms) 8 Furnish and install stamped concrete per plans, details and SF 161 $ 8.00 $ 1,288.00 specifications 9 Furnish and install 3" — 8" diameter "Sun Pebbles" per TN 22 $ 55.00 $ 1,210.00 plans, details and specifications 10 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 4 x 4 x 4 per TN 3 $ 165.00 $ 495.00 plans details and specifications 11 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 3 x 3 x 3 per TN 4 $ 75.00 $ 300.00 plans details and specifications 12 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 2 x 3 x 2 per TN 2 $ 44.00 $ 88.00 plans details and specifications 13 Furnish and install "Desert Gold" fines 2" thick per plans TN 160 $ 55.00 $ 8,800.00 and specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 14 (IID) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller and electric EA 0 $ 7,000.00 $ - meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 15 (IID) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller CCU and EA 1 $ 9,000.00 $ 9'000.00 electric meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications 16 Furnish and install superior electric remote control master EA 0 $ 250.00 $ - valve per plans, details and specifications 17 Furnish and install pressure regulator per plans, details and EA 0 $ 250.00 $ - specifications 18 Furnish and install 3/4" Nibco ball valve EA 0 $ 100.00 $ - Furnish and install'/a" electric remote control valve 19 assembly and wiring with pressure regulator and filter per EA 3 $ 200.00 $ 600.00 details, plans and specifications E2OFurnish and install 1" Rainbird Model 44 LRC quick EA 3 $ 65.00 $ 195.00 coupling valve per detail and specifications COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project (Median I) ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXTENDED NO. PRICE 21 Furnish and install flow sensor and wire to controllers per EA 0 $ 100.00 $ - details and specifications 22 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SU series drip emitter 1.0 EA 8 $ 8.00 $ 64.00 gph on'/s" riser per plans, details, and specifications Furnish and install Bowsmith "SL" series drip emitter 2.0 23 gph on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications EA 133 $ 8.00 $ 1,064.00 24 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SL" series drip emitter .6 gph EA 6 $ 8.00 $ 48.00 on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications 25 Furnish and install - 2 gph bubbler per palm location per EA 30 $ detail in deep watering pipe 30.00 $ 900.00 26 Furnish and install flush valve per plans, details and EA 3 $ 100.00 $ 300.00 specifications 27 Furnish and install - 2 gph bubbler per tree location per EA 36 $ 45.00 $ 1,620.00 detail in deep watering pipe Furnish and install Backflow Prevention Device per plans 28 and specifications LF 0 $ 800.00 $ - 29 Furnish and install 1 V2" SCH 40 PVC mainline per plans, LF 1,355 $ 3.00 $ 4,065.00 details and specifications 30 Furnish and install'/a" SCH 40 PVC lateral line per plans LF 5,159 $ 1.00 $ 5,159.00 and specifications 31 Furnish and install 7' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 4 $ 400.00 $ 1,600.00 skinned - includes backfill and fertilizer 32 Furnish and install I F brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 4 $ 500.00 $ 2,000.00 skinned - includes backfill and fertilizer Furnish and install 15' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, 33 skinned -includes backfill and fertilizer EA 0 $ 700.00 $ - 34 Furnish and install 24" Box Mediterranean Fan Palm EA 6 $ 350.00 $ 2,100.00 35 Furnish and install 4' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 1 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 36 Furnish and install 7' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 0 $ 1,200.00 $ - 37 Furnish and install 36" Box Blue Palo Verde EA 0 $ 650.00 $ - 38 Furnish and install 36" Box Jacaranda EA 0 $ 650.00 $ - 39 Furnish and install 24" Box California Pepper EA 2 $ 325.00 $ 650.00 40 Furnish and install 24" Box Orchid Tree EA 4 $ 325.00 $ 1,300.00 41 Furnish and install 24" Box Acacia EA 4 $ 325.00 $ 1,300.00 42 Furnish and install 5 gallon Barbados Pride EA 8 $ 25.00 $ 200.00 43 Furnish and install 5 gallon Thunder Cloud EA 21 $ 25.00 $ 525.00 44 Furnish and install 5 gallon Desert Cassia EA 5 $ 25.00 $ 125.00 45 Furnish and install 8 cane Ocotillo EA 6 $ 70.00 $ 420.00 46 Furnish and install Golden Barrel Cactus 10" diameter EA 0 $ 75.00 $ - 47 Furnish and install 5 gallon Fairy Duster EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - 48 Furnish and install 1 gallon Autumn Sage EA 10 $ 8.00 $ 80.00 49 Furnish and install 1 gallon Red Yucca EA 8 $ 8.00 $ 64.00 50 Furnish and install 1 gallon New Gold Lantana EA 12 $ 8.00 $ 96.00 51 Furnish and install 1 gallon Purple Lantana EA 6 $ 8.00 $ 48.00 52 Furnish and install 1 gallon Baccharis EA 71 $ 8.00 $ 568.00 53 Branch Circuit Trench FT 1,420 $ 1.03 $ 1,462.60 54 Backfrll BC Trench FT 1,420 $ 0.62 $ 880.40 COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project (Median I) NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE E TENDEED 55 Service Lateral Trench FT 20 $ 1.11 $ 22.20 56 Backfill Service Lateral Trench FT 20 $ 0.41 $ 8.20 57 (1) 4" Service Lateral Conduit FT 20 $ 9.58 $ 191.60 58 2#10 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 65 $ 3.50 $ 227.50 59 4#10 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit Fr 0 $ - $ - 60 2#8 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 61 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 62 6#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 63 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 64 4#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit Fr 0 $ - $ - 65 2#8 4#10 1#12GRD 1"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 66 2#8 4#10 2#121#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 67 4#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 68 2#8 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 69 2#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit Fr 405 $ 5.43 $ 2,199.15 70 2#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit Fr 15 $ 4.13 $ 61.95 71 2#8 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit Fr 0 $ - $ - 72 2#8 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 73 2#10 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 1,140 $ 6.06 $ 6,908.40 74 4#8 2#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 75 4#8 2#10 1#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 76 Fixture "A" EA 17 $ 550.03 $ 9,350.51 77 Fixture "B" EA 8 $ 361.27 $ 2,890.16 78 Fixture "C" EA 0 79 Receptacles EA 4 $ 76.79 $ 307.16 80 Meter Pedestal EA 1 $ 4,837.40 $ 4,837.40 81 CB 20-40Amp/1 &2 10KAIC EA 26 $ 85.95 $ 2,234.70 82 Ground Rod EA 1 $ 88.91 $ 88.91 83 Lighting Contactors (20AMP) EA 1 $ 213.98 $ 213.98 84 Photocell EA 1 $ 70.88 $ 70.88 85 Time Clock EA 1 $ 295.09 $ 295.09 86 Christy Pullboxes EA 27 $ 73.42 $ 1,982.34 87 Pullboxes EA 3 $ 161.07 $ 483.21 88 Miscellaneous Electrical Utilization Equipment LS 1 $ 2,428.09 $ 2,428.09 89 Provide a 1 year maintenance for all planting, irrigation and electrical/lighting elements in the project area. Guidelines provided by the City maintenance department and attached forms LS 1 $ 2,400.00 $ 2,400.00 Sub Total: 10% Contingency TOTAL: $ 102,316.87 $ 10,231.69 $ 112,548.56 COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project (Median J) ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXPENDED CE 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 3 Clear and Grub existing plantings - (shrubs and irrigation) SF 3,836 $ 0.12 $ 460.32 4 Remove existing tree per plans, details and specifications, EA 0 $ 100.00 $ - (Crape Myrtles 8' average) 5 Remove existing unclassified material/soil CY 49 $ 15.00 $ 735.00 Furnish and install fill material to replace unclassified 6 material/ soil removed as described in Section 3000. (2" CY 49 $ 15.00 $ 735.00 depth — fill to 3" of top of curb) Furnish and install fill material (of "like" consistency to existing soil type), create berms with maximum height of 7 12" per plans and specifications, and make final adjusments CY 0 $ 15.00 $ to berms per Landscape Architect (item shall include all materials and labor necessary for the construction of landscaped berms) 8 Furnish and install stamped concrete per plans, details and SF 67 $ 8.00 $ 536.00 specifications 9 Furnish and install 3" — 8" diameter "Sun Pebbles" per TN 4 $ 55.00 $ 220.00 plans, details and specifications 10 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 4 x 4 x 4 per TN 0 $ 165.00 $ - plans details and specifications 11 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 3 x 3 x 3 per TN 0 $ 75.00 $ - plans details and specifications 12 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 2 x 3 x 2 per TN 0 $ 44.00 $ - plans details and specifications 13 Furnish and install "Desert Gold" fines 2" thick per plans TN 36 $ 55.00 $ 1,980.00 and specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 14 (IID) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller and electric EA 0 $ 7,000.00 $ - meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 15 (IID) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller CCU and EA 0 $ 9,000.00 $ - electric meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications 16 Furnish and install superior electric remote control master EA 0 $ 250.00 $ - valve per plans, details and specifications Furnish and install pressure regulator per plans, details and 17 specifications EA 0 $ 250.00 $ - 18 Furnish and install %" Nibco ball valve EA 0 $ 100.00 $ - Furnish and install'/a" electric remote control valve 19 assembly and wiring with pressure regulator and filter per EA 2 $ 200.00 $ 400.00 details, plans and specifications 20 Furnish and install 1" Rainbird Model 44 LRC quick EA 2 $ 65.00 $ 130.00 coupling valve per detail and specifications 2 "? 0. 7 COST ESTIMATE Project no. "-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project (Median J) ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXPENDED NO.CE 21 Furnish and install flow sensor and wire to controllers per EA 0 $ 100.00 $ - details and specifications 22 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SL" series drip emitter 1.0 EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - gph on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications 23 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SL" series drip emitter 2.0 EA 32 $ 8.00 $ 256.00 gph on 1/z" riser per plans, details, and specifications 24 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SL" series drip emitter .6 gph EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications 25 Furnish and install - 2 gph bubbler per palm location per EA 8 $ 30.00 $ 240.00 detail in deep watering pipe 26 Furnish and install flush valve per plans, details and EA 2 $ 100.00 $ 200.00 specifications 27 Furnish and install - 2 gph bubbler per tree location per EA 0 $ 45.00 $ - detail in deep watering pipe 28 Furnish and install Backflow Prevention Device per plans LF 0 $ 800.00 $ - and specifications 29 Furnish and install 1 V2" SCH 40 PVC mainline per plans, LF 180 $ 3.00 $ 540.00 details and specifications 30 Furnish and install 3/a" SCH 40 PVC lateral line per plans LF 960 $ 1.00 $ 960.00 and specifications 31 Furnish and install 7' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 2 $ 400.00 $ 800.00 skinned - includes backfill and fertilizer 32 Furnish and install I brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 skinned - includes backfill and fertilizer 33 Furnish and install 15' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 0 $ 700.00 $ - skinned -includes backfill and fertilizer 34 Furnish and install 24" Box Mediterranean Fan Palm EA 0 $ 350.00 $ - 35 Furnish and install 4' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 0 $ 800.00 $ - 36 Furnish and install 7' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 0 $ 1,200.00 $ - 37 Furnish and install 36" Box Blue Palo Verde EA 0 $ 650.00 $ - 38 Furnish and install 36" Box Jacaranda EA 0 $ 650.00 $ - 39 Furnish and install 24" Box California Pepper EA 0 $ 325.00 $ - 40 Furnish and install 24" Box Orchid Tree EA 0 $ 325.00 $ - 41 Furnish and install 24" Box Acacia EA 0 $ 325.00 $ - 42 Furnish and install 5 gallon Barbados Pride EA 0 $ 25.00 $ - 43 Furnish and install 5 gallon Thunder Cloud EA 0 $ 25.00 $ - 44 Furnish and install 5 gallon Desert Cassia EA 4 $ 25.00 $ 100.00 45 Furnish and install 8 cane Ocotillo EA 1 $ 70.00 $ 70.00 46 Furnish and install Golden Barrel Cactus 10" diameter EA 10 $ 75.00 $ 750.00 47 Furnish and install 5 gallon Fairy Duster EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - 48 Furnish and install 1 gallon Autumn Sage EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - 49 Furnish and install 1 gallon Red Yucca EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - 50 Furnish and install 1 gallon New Gold Lantana EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - 51 Furnish and install 1 gallon Purple Lantana EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - 52 Furnish and install 1 gallon Baccharis EA 18 $ 8.00 $ 144.00 53 Branch Circuit Trench FT 370 $ 1.03 $ 381.10 54 JBackfill BC Trench FT 370 $ 0.62 $ 229.40 I AW COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project (Median J) ITEM NO.CE DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXPENDED 55 Service Lateral Trench FT 0 $ - $ - 56 Backfill Service Lateral Trench FT 0 $ - $ - 57 (1) 4" Service Lateral Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 58 2#10 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 59 4#10 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 60 2#8 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 61 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 62 6#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 63 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 35 $ 3.34 $ 116.90 64 4#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 250 $ 3.97 $ 992.50 65 2#8 4#10 1#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 66 2#8 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 67 4#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 68 2#8 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 69 2#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 70 2#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 71 2#8 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 72 2#8 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 73 2#10 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 74 4#8 2#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 75 4#82#10 1#12GRD 1"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 76 Fixture "A" EA 0 $ - $ - 77 Fixture "B" EA 5 $ 361.27 $ 1,806.35 78 Fixture "C" EA 0 79 Receptacles EA 2 $ 76.79 $ 153.58 80 Meter Pedestal EA 0 $ - $ - 81 CB 20-40Amp/1&2 10KAIC EA 0 $ - $ - 82 Ground Rod EA 0 $ - $ - 83 Lighting Contactors (20AMP) EA 0 $ - $ - 84 Photocell EA 0 $ - $ - 85 Time Clock EA 0 $ - $ - 86 Christy Pullboxes EA 7 $ 73.42 $ 513.94 87 Pullboxes EA 1 $ 161.07 $ 161.07 88 Miscellaneous Electrical Utilization Equipment LS 1 $ 435.56 $ 435.56 89 Provide a 1 year maintenance for all planting, irrigation and electrical/lighting elements in the project area. Guidelines provided by the City maintenance department and attached forms LS 1 $ 2,400.00 $ 2,400.00 Sub Total: 10% Contingency TOTAL: $ 20,446.72 $ 2,044.67 $ 22,491.39 COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project Median K ITEM NO.1 DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXTENDED PRICE Mobilization LS 1 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 3 Clear and Grub existing plantings - (shrubs and irrigation) SF 19,723 $ 0.12 $ 2,366.76 4 Remove existing tree per plans, details and specifications, EA 0 $ 100.00 $ - (Crape Myrtles 8' average) 5 Remove existing unclassified material/soil CY 258 $ 15.00 $ 3,870.00 Furnish and install fill material to replace unclassified 6 material/ soil removed as described in Section 3000. (2" CY 258 $ 15.00 $ 3,870.00 depth — fill to 3" of top of curb) Furnish and install fill material (of "like" consistency to existing soil type), create berms with maximum height of 7 12" per plans and specifications, and make final adjusments CY 0 $ 15.00 $ to berms per Landscape Architect (item shall include all materials and labor necessary for the construction of landscaped berms) 8 Furnish and install stamped concrete per plans, details and SF 0 $ 8.00 $ - specifications 9 Furnish and install 3" — 8" diameter "Sun Pebbles" per TN 30 $ 55.00 $ 1,650.00 plans, details and specifications 10 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 4 x 4 x 4 per TN 12 $ 165.00 $ 1,980.00 plans details and specifications 11 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 3 x 3 x 3 per TN 5 $ 75.00 $ 375.00 plans details and specifications 12 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 2 x 3 x 2 per TN 4 $ 44.00 $ 176.00 plans details and specifications 13 Furnish and install "Desert Gold" fines 2" thick per plans TN 181 $ 55.00 $ 9,955.00 and specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 14 (11D) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller and electric EA 0 $ 7,000.00 $ - meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 15 (1ID) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller CCU and EA 0 $ 9,000.00 $ - electric meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications 16 Furnish and install superior electric remote control master valve per plans, details and specifications EA 0 $ 250.00 $ - 17 Furnish and install pressure regulator per plans, details and EA 0 $ 250.00 $ - specifications 18 Furnish and install W Nibco ball valve EA 1 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 Furnish and install 3/a" electric remote control valve 19 assembly and wiring with pressure regulator and filter per EA 3 $ 200.00 $ 600.00 details, plans and specifications 20 Furnish and install 1" Rainbird Model 44 LRC quick EA 3 $ 65.00 $ 195.00 coupling valve per detail and specifications COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project Median K ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXTENDED PRICE 21 Furnish and install flow sensor and wire to controllers per details and specifications EA 0 $ 100.00 $ - 22 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SL" series drip emitter 1.0 gph on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications EA 15 $ 8.00 $ 120.00 23 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SL" series drip emitter 2.0 gph on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications EA 146 $ 8.00 $ 1,168.00 24 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SU series drip emitter .6 gph on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications EA 9 $ 8.00 $ 72.00 25 Furnish and install - 2 gph bubbler per palm location per detail in deep watering pipe EA 34 $ 30.00 $ 1,020.00 26 Furnish and install flush valve per plans, details and specifications EA 4 $ 100.00 $ 400.00 27 Furnish and install - 2 gph bubbler per tree location per detail in deep watering pipe EA 33 $ 45.00 $ 1,485.00 28 Furnish and install Backflow Prevention Device per plans and specifications LF 0 $ 800.00 $ - 29 Furnish and install 1 ih" SCH 40 PVC mainline per plans, details and specifications LF 2,080 $ 3.00 $ 6,240.00 30 Furnish and install 3/a" SCH 40 PVC lateral line per plans and specifications LF 5,925 $ 1.00 $ 5,925.00 31 Furnish and install 7' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, skinned - includes backfill and fertilizer EA 4 $ 400.00 $ 1,600.00 32 Furnish and install 11' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, skinned - includes backfill and fertilizer EA 6 $ 500.00 $ 3,000.00 33 Furnish and install 15' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, skinned -includes backfill and fertilizer EA 0 $ 700.00 $ - 34 Furnish and install 24" Box Mediterranean Fan Palm EA 4 $ 350.00 $ 1,400.00 35 Furnish and install 4' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 1 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 36 Furnish and install 7' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 2 $ 1,200.00 $ 2,400.00 37 Furnish and install 36" Box Blue Palo Verde EA 5 $ 650.00 $ 3,250.00 38 Furnish and install 36" Box Jacaranda EA 0 $ 650.00 $ - 39 Furnish and install 24" Box California Pepper EA 4 $ 325.00 $ 1,300.00 40 Furnish and install 24" Box Orchid Tree EA 2 $ 325.00 $ 650.00 41 Furnish and install 24" Box Acacia EA 0 $ 325.00 $ - 42 Furnish and install 5 gallon Barbados Pride EA 13 $ 25.00 $ 325.00 43 Furnish and install 5 gallon Thunder Cloud EA 14 $ 25.00 $ 350.00 44 Furnish and install 5 gallon Desert Cassia EA 6 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 45 Furnish and install 8 cane Ocotillo EA 9 $ 70.00 $ 630.00 46 IFurnish and install Golden Barrel Cactus 10" diameter EA 0 $ 75.00 $ - 47 Furnish and install 5 gallon Fairy Duster EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - 48 Furnish and install 1 gallon Autumn Sage EA 15 $ 8.00 $ 120.00 49 Furnish and install 1 gallon Red Yucca EA 15 $ 8.00 $ 120.00 50 lFurnish and install 1 gallon New Gold Lantana EA 40 $ 8.00 $ 320.00 51 Furnish and install 1 gallon Purple Lantana EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - 52 Furnish and install 1 gallon Baccharis EA 58 $ 8.00 $ 464.00 53 Branch Circuit Trench FT 1,500 $ 1.03 $ 1,545.00 54 Backfill BC Trench FT 1,500 $ 0.62 $ 930.00 1.3r COST ESTIMATE Project no. "-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project Median K ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXTENDED PRICE 55 Service Lateral Trench FT 50 $ 1.11 $ 55.50 56 Backfill Service Lateral Trench FT 50 $ 0.41 $ 20.50 57 (1) 4" Service Lateral Conduit FT 50 $ 9.58 $ 479.00 58 2#10 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit Fr 0 $ - $ _ 59 14#10 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit Fr 0 $ _ $ _ 60 2#8 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ _ 61 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit Fr 0 $ - $ _ 62 6#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ _ $ _ 63 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ _ $ _ 64 4#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit Fr 0 $ - $ _ 65 2#8 4#10 1#12GRD 1"Conduit Fr 0 $ _ $ _ 66 2#8 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ _ $ _ 67 4#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ _ $ _ 68 2#8 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit Fr 0 $ _ $ - 69 2#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 230 $ 5.43 $ 1,248.90 70 2#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 340 $ 4.13 $ 1,404.20 71 2#8 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit Fr 0 $ - $ - 72 2#8 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 73 2#10 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 930 $ 6.06 $ 5,635.80 74 4#8 2# 10 2# 12 1 # 12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 670 $ 7.63 $ 5,112.10 75 4#8 2#10 1#12GRD 1"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ _ 76 Fixture "A" EA 15 $ 550.03 $ 8,250.45 77 Fixture "B" EA 9 $ 361.27 $ 3,251.43 78 Fixture "C" EA 0 79 Receptacles EA 5 $ 76.79 $ 383.95 80 Meter Pedestal EA 1 $ 4,837.40 $ 4,837.40 81 CB 20-40Amp/l&2 10KAIC EA 26 $ 85.95 $ 2,234.70 82 Ground Rod EA 1 $ 88.91 $ 88.91 83 Lighting Contactors (20AMP) EA 1 $ 213.98 $ 213.98 84 Photocell EA 1 $ 70.88 $ 70.88 85 Time Clock EA 1 $ 295.09 $ 295.09 86 Christy Pullboxes EA 27 $ 73.42 $ 1,982.34 87 JPullboxes EA 4 $ 161.07 $ 644.28 88 IMiscellaneous Electrical Utilization Equipment LS 1 $ 3,868.43 $ 3,868.43 89 Provide a 1 year maintenance for all planting, irrigation and electrical/lighting elements in the project area. Guidelines provided by the City maintenance department and attached forms LS 1 $ 3,800.00 $ 3,800.00 Sub Total: 10% Contingency TOTAL: $ 110,799.60 $ 11,079.96 $ 121,879.56 ��2 COST ESTIMATE Project no. "-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project Median L ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT EXTENDED NO. PRICE PRICE 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 3 Clear and Grub existing plantings - (shrubs and irrigation) SF 5,098 $ 0.12 $ 611.76 4 Remove existing tree per plans, details and specifications, (Crape Myrtles 8' average) EA 0 $ 100.00 $ - 5 Remove existing unclassified material/soil CY 0 $ 15.00 $ - Fumish and install fill material to replace unclassified 6 material/ soil removed as described in Section 3000. (2" CY 0 $ 15.00 $ - depth — fill to 3" of top of curb) Fumish and install fill material (of "like" consistency to existing soil type), create berms with maximum height of 7 12" per plans and specifications, and make final adjusments CY 502 $ 15.00 $ 7,530.00 to berms per Landscape Architect (item shall include all materials and labor necessary for the construction of landscaped berms) 8 Furnish and install stamped concrete per plans, details and specifications SF 0 $ 8.00 $ - 9 Furnish and install 3" — 8" diameter "Sun Pebbles" per plans, details and specifications TN 9 $ 55.00 $ 495.00 10 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 4 x 4 x 4 per TN 1 $ 165.00 $ 165.00 plans details and specifications 11 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 3 x 3 x 3 per plans details and specifications IN 1 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 12 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 2 x 3 x 2 per TN 1 $ 44.00 $ 44.00 plans details and specifications 13 land Furnish and install "Desert Gold" fines 2" thick per plans TN 46 $ 55.00 $ 2,530.00 specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 14 (IID) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller and electric EA 1 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 15 (11D) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller CCU and EA 0 $ 9,000.00 $ - electric meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications 16 Furnish and install superior electric remote control master valve per plans, details and specifications EA 1 $ 250.00 $ 250.00 17 Furnish and install pressure regulator per plans, details and EA 1 $ 250.00 $ 250.00 specifications 18 Furnish and install 3/s" Nibco ball valve EA 4 $ 100.00 $ 400.00 Furnish and install 3/a" electric remote control valve 19 assembly and wiring with pressure regulator and filter per EA 0 $ 200.00 $ - details, plans and specifications 20 Furnish and install 1" Rainbird Model 44 LRC quick EA 1 $ 65.00 $ 65.00 coupling valve per detail and specifications 0,1A COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project Median L ITEM NO. DESCRIPTIONT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXTENDED PRICE 21 Furnish and install flow sensor and wire to controllers per details and specifications EA 1 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 22 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SU series drip emitter 1.0 gph on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications EA 3 $ 8.00 $ 24.00 23 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SU series drip emitter 2.0 gph on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications EA 41 $ 8.00 $ 328.00 24 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SU series drip emitter .6 gph on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications EA 1 $ 8.00 $ 8.00 25 Furnish and install - 2 gph bubbler per palm location per detail in deep watering pipe EA 4 $ 30.00 $ 120.00 26 Furnish and install flush valve per plans, details and specifications EA 3 $ 100.00 $ 300.00 27 Furnish and install - 2 gph bubbler per tree location per detail in deep watering pipe EA 12 $ 45.00 $ 540.00 28 Furnish and install Backflow Prevention Device per plans land specifications LF 1 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 29 Furnish and install 1 '/z" SCH 40 PVC mainline per plans, details and specifications LF 790 $ 3.00 $ 2,370.00 30 Furnish and install 3/s" SCH 40 PVC lateral line per plans and specifications LF 1,255 $ 1.00 $ 1,255.00 31 Furnish and install 7' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, skinned - includes backfill and fertilizer EA 1 $ 400.00 $ 400.00 32 Furnish and install I brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, skinned - includes backfill and fertilizer EA 1 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 33 Furnish and install 15' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, skinned -includes backfill and fertilizer EA 0 $ 700.00 $ - 34 Furnish and install 24" Box Mediterranean Fan Palm EA 0 $ 350.00 $ - 35 Furnish and install 4' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 0 $ 800.00 $ - 36 Furnish and install 7' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 0 $ 1,200.00 $ - 37 Furnish and install 36" Box Blue Palo Verde EA 0 $ 650.00 $ - 38 Furnish and install 36" Box Jacaranda EA 0 $ 650.00 $ - 39 Furnish and install 24" Box California Pepper EA 0 $ 325.00 $ - 40 Furnish and install 24" Box Orchid Tree EA 4 $ 325.00 $ 1,300.00 41 Furnish and install 24" Box Acacia EA 0 $ 325.00 $ - 42 Furnish and install 5 gallon Barbados Pride EA 6 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 43 Furnish and install 5 gallon Thunder Cloud EA 0 $ 25.00 $ - 44 Furnish and install 5 gallon Desert Cassia EA 6 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 45 Furnish and install 8 cane Ocotillo EA 1 $ 70.00 $ 70.00 46 Furnish and install Golden Barrel Cactus 10" diameter EA 0 $ 75.00 $ - 47 Furnish and install 5 gallon Fairy Duster EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - 48 Furnish and install 1 gallon Autumn Sage EA 3 $ 8.00 $ 24.00 49 Furnish and install 1 gallon Red Yucca EA 3 $ 8.00 $ 24.00 50 1 Furnish and install 1 gallon New Gold Lantana EA 26 $ 8.00 $ 208.00 51 Furnish and install 1 gallon Purple Lantana EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - 52 Furnish and install 1 gallon Baccharis EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - 53 Branch Circuit Trench FT 450 $ 1.03 $ 463.50 54 Backfill BC Trench FT 450 $ 0.62 $ 279.00 v COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project Median L ITEM NO.DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRIC EXPTENDED RICE 55 Service Lateral Trench FT 30 $ 1.11 $ 33.30 56 JBackfill. Service Lateral Trench FT 30 $ 0.41 $ 12.30 57 (1) 4" Service Lateral Conduit FT 30 $ 9.58 $ 287.40 58 2#10 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 59 4#10 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 60 2#8 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 61 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 62 6#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 63 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 64 4#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 65 2#8 4#10 1#12GRD 1"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 66 2#8 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 67 4#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4-Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 68 12#8 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 69 2#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 70 2#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 71 2#8 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 72 2#8 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 73 2#10 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ _ 74 4#8 2#10 2#121#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 755 $ 7.63 $ 5,760.65 75 4#8 2#10 1#12GRD 1"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 76 Fixture "A" EA 4 $ 550.03 $ 2,200.12 77 IFixture ,B" EA 2 $ 361.27 $ 722.54 78 IFixture "C" EA 0 79 1 Receptacles EA 1 $ 76.79 $ 76.79 80 Meter Pedestal EA 1 $ 4,837.40 $ 4,837.40 81 CB 20-40Amptl&2 IOKAIC EA 2 $ 85.95 $ 171.90 82 Ground Rod EA 1 $ 88.91 $ 88.91 83 Lighting Contactors (20AMP) EA 0 $ - $ - 84 Photocell EA 0 $ - $ - 85 Time Clock EA 1 $ 295.09 $ 295.09 86 Christy Pullboxes EA 7 $ 73.42 $ 513.94 87 Pullboxes EA 4 $ 161.07 $ 644.28 88 Miscellaneous Electrical Utilization Equipment LS 1 $ 1,638.84 $ 1,638.84 89 Provide a I year maintenance for all planting, irrigation and electrical/lighting elements in the project area. Guidelines provided by the City maintenance department and attached forms LS 1 $ 2,400.00 $ 2,400.00 Sub Total: 10% Contingency TOTAL: $ 51,512.72 $ 5,151.27 $ 56,663.99 3� U05 COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project Median M ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT EXTENDED PRICE PRICE 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 3 Clear and Grub existing plantings - (shrubs and irrigation) SF 6,957 $ 0.12 $ 834.84 4 Remove existing tree per plans, details and specifications, EA 0 $ 100.00 $ - (Crape Myrtles 8' average) 5 lRemove existing unclassified material/soil CY 0 $ 15.00 $ - Furnish and install fill material to replace unclassified 6 material/ soil removed as described in Section 3000. (2" CY 0 $ 15.00 $ - depth — fill to 3" of top of curb) Furnish and install fill material (of "like" consistency to existing soil type), create berms with maximum height of 7 12" per plans and specifications, and make final adjusments CY 42 $ 15.00 $ 630.00 to berms per Landscape Architect (item shall include all materials and labor necessary for the construction of landscaped berms) 8 Furnish and install stamped concrete per plans, details and specifications SF 0 $ 8.00 $ - 9 Furnish and install 3" — 8" diameter "Sun Pebbles" per plans, details and specifications TN 8 $ 55.00 $ 440.00 10 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 4 x 4 x 4 per plans details and specifications IN 1 $ 165.00 $ 165.00 11 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 3 x 3 x 3 per TN 4 $ 75.00 $ 300.00 plans details and specifications 12 Install Decorative Granite River Rock Boulders 2 x 3 x 2 per plans details and specifications TN 2 $ 44.00 $ 88.00 13 Furnish and install "Desert Gold" fines 2" thick per plans and specifications TN 65 $ 55.00 $ 3,575.00 Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 14 (IID) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller and electric EA 0 $ 7,000.00 $ - meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications Furnish and install and provide necessary hookup and wiring 15 (HD) for Rainbird Maxicom irrigation controller CCU and EA 0 $ 9,000.00 $ - electric meter in locking meter enclosure per plans, details and specifications 16 Furnish and install superior electric remote control master valve per plans, details and specifications EA 0 $ 250.00 $ - 17 Furnish and install pressure regulator per plans, details and specifications EA 0 $ 250.00 $ - 18 Furnish and install 3/a" Nibco ball valve EA 1 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 Furnish and install 3/" electric remote control valve 19 assembly and wiring with pressure regulator and filter per EA 3 $ 200.00 $ 600.00 details, plans and specifications 20 Furnish and install 1" Rainbird Model 44 LRC quick coupling valve per detail and specifications EA 1 $ 65.00 $ 65.00 13 U�� COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project Median M ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE EXTENDED PRICE 21 Furnish and install flow sensor and wire to controllers per details and specifications EA 0 $ 100.00 $ - 22 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SU series drip emitter 1.0 gph on V2" riser per plans, details, and specifications EA 3 $ 8.00 $ 24.00 23 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SL" series drip emitter 2.0 gph on 1/2" riser per plans, details, and specifications EA 82 $ 8.00 $ 656.00 24 Furnish and install Bowsmith "SU series drip emitter .6 gph on 1/2" riser per plans, details, and specifications EA 3 $ 8.00 $ 24.00 25 Furnish and install - 2 gph bubbler per palm location per detail in deep watering pipe EA 4 $ 30.00 $ 120.00 26 Furnish and install flush valve per plans, details and specifications EA 0 $ 100.00 $ - 27 Furnish and install - 2 gph bubbler per tree location per detail in deep watering pipe EA 24 $ 45.00 $ 1,080.00 28 Furnish and install Backflow Prevention Device per plans and specifications LF 0 $ 800.00 $ - 29 Furnish and install 1 V2" SCH 40 PVC mainline per plans, details and specifications LF 505 $ 3.00 $ ' 1,515.00 30 Furnish and install 3/a" SCH 40 PVC lateral line per plans and specifications LF 2,275 $ 1.00 $ 2,275.00 31 Furnish and install 7' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, skinned - includes backfill and fertilizer EA 0 $ 400.00 $ - 32 Furnish and install I V brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, skinned - includes backfill and fertilizer EA 0 $ 500.00 $ - 33 Furnish and install 15' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, skinned -includes backfill and fertilizer EA 0 $ 700.00 $ - 34 Furnish and install 24" Box Mediterranean Fan Palm EA 0 $ 350.00 $ - 35 Furnish and install 4' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 1 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 36 lFurnish and install 7' overall height Mexican Blue Palm EA 1 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 37 JFurnish and install 36" Box Blue Palo Verde EA 0 $ 650.00 $ - 38 Furnish and install 36" Box Jacaranda EA 0 $ 650.00 $ - 39 Furnish and install 24" Box California Pepper EA 4 $ 325.00 $ 1,300.00 40 Furnish and install 24" Box Orchid Tree EA 4 $ 325.00 $ 1,300.00 41 Furnish and install 24" Box Acacia EA 0 $ 325.00 $ - 42 Furnish and install 5 gallon Barbados Pride EA 0 $ 25.00 $ - 43 Furnish and install 5 gallon Thunder Cloud EA 13 $ 25.00 $ 325.00 44 Furnish and install gallon Desert Cassia EA 6 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 45 Furnish and install 8 cane Ocotillo EA 3 $ 70.00 $ 210.00 46 Furnish and install Golden Barrel Cactus 10" diameter EA 0 $ 75.00 $ - 47 Furnish and install 5 gallon Fairy Duster EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - 48 Furnish and install 1 gallon Autumn Sage EA 7 $ 8.00 $ 56.00 49 Furnish and install 1 gallon Red Yucca EA 3 $ 8.00 $ 24.00 50 Furnish and install 1 gallon New Gold Lantana EA 24 $ 8.00 $ 192.00 51 Furnish and install 1 gallon Purple Lantana EA 32 $ 8.00 $ 256.00 52 Furnish and install 1 gallon Baccharis EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - 53 lBackfill Branch Circuit Trench FT 675 $ 1.03 $ 695.25 54 BC Trench FT 675 $ 0.62 1 $ 418.50 U o" COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project Median M ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QTy, UNIT PRICE EXTENDED PRICE 55 Service Lateral Trench FT 220 $ 1.11 $ 244.20 56 Backfill Service Lateral Trench FT 220 $ 0.41 $ 90.20 57 (1) 4" Service Lateral Conduit FT 220 $ 9.58 $ 2,107.60 58 2#10 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 59 4#10 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 60 2#8 6# 12 1 # 12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ _ $ - 61 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 62 6#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ _ $ _ 63 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 64 4#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 65 2#84#10 1#12GRD 1"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ _ 66 2#8 4#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 67 4#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 68 2#8 2#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 69 2#10 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 70 2#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 71 2#8 4#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 72 2#8 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ _ 73 2#10 6#12 1#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 74 4#8 2#10 2#12 1#12GRD 1"Conduit FT 570 $ 7.63 $ 4,349.10 75 4#8 2#12 1#12GRD 1"Conduit FT 270 $ 6.84 $ 1,846.80 76 Fixture "A" EA 8 $ 550.03 $ 4,400.24 77 Fixture "B" EA 0 $ - $ - 78 Fixture "C" EA 0 79 Receptacles EA 1 $ 76.79 $ 76.79 80 Meter Pedestal EA 0 $ - $ - 81 CB 20-40Amp/1&2 10KAIC EA 0 $ - $ - 82 Ground Rod EA 0 $ - $ - 83 Lighting Contactors (20AMP) EA 0 $ - $ - 84 Photocell EA 0 $ - $ - 85 Time Clock EA 0 $ - $ - 86 Christy Pullboxes EA 9 $ 73.42 $ 660.78 87 Pullboxes EA 2 $ 161.07 $ 322.14 88 Miscellaneous Electrical Utilization Equipment LS 1 $ 1,521.62 $ 1,521.62 89 Provide a 1 year maintenance for all planting, irrigation and electrical/lighting elements in the project area. Guidelines provided by the City maintenance department and attached forms LS 1 $ 2,400.00 $ 2,400.00 Sub Total: 10% Contingency TOTAL: $ 46,438.06 $ 4,643.81 $ 51,081.87 COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project Median N UNIT EXTENDED TI'EM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. PRICE PRICE NO. Furnish and install flow sensor and wire to controllers per EA 0 $ 100.00 $ - 21 details and specifications Furnish and install Bowsmith "SL" series drip emitter 1.0 EA 2 $ 8.00 $ 16.00 22 gph on W' riser per plans, details, and specifications and install Bowsmith "SL" series drip emitter 2.0 EA 95 $ 8.00 $ 760.00 Furnish 23 gph on W riser per plans, details, and specifications urnish and install Bowsmith "SL" series drip emitter .6 gph EA 1 $ 8.00 $ 8.00 24 JFon W riser per plans, details, and specific ions Furnish and install - 2 gph bubbler per palm k"tion per EA 14 $ 30.00 $ 420.00 25 detail in deep watering pipe Furnish and install flush valve per plans, details and EA 3 $ 100.00 $ 300-00 26 specifications and install - 2 gph bubbler per tree location per EA 12 $ 45.00 $ 540.00 27 JFurnish detail in deep watering pipe and install Baddlow Prevention Device per plans LF 0 $ 800.00 $ - 28 JFumk* and specifications Furnish and install 1 ifs" SCH 40 PVC mainline per plans, � 500 $ 3.00 $ 1,500.00 29 details and specifications Furnish and install W' SCH 40 PVC lateral line per plans LF 2,845 $ 1.00 $ 2,M5.00 30 land specifications Furnish and install 7' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 2 $ 400.00 $ 800.00 31 skinned - includes backfill and fertilizer Furnish and install 11' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 32 skinned - includes backfill and fertilizer Furnish and install 15' brown trunk Mexican Fan Palm, EA 0 $ 700.00 $ - 33 s"m d-includes bad] M and fertilizer 34 1Furnish and install 24" Box Mediterranean Fan Palm and install 4' overall height Mexican Blue Palm Furnish and install 7' overall height Mexican Blue Patin Furnish and install 36" Box Blue Palo Verde Furnish and install 36" Box Jacaranda Furnish and install 24" Box California Pepper Furnish and install 24" Box Orchid Tree EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 $ 350.00 $ 800.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 650.00 $ 650.00 $ 325.00 $ 325.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 975.00 35 Ifurnish 36 37 38 39 40 41 lFurnish and install 24" Box Acacia EA 4 $ 325.00 $ 1,300.00 42 Furnish and install 5 gallon Barbados Pride 'EA 0 $ 25.00 $ - 43 Furnish and install 5 gallon Thunder Cloud EA 0 $ 25.00 $ - 44 Furnish and install 5 gallon Desert Cassia EA 10 $ 25-00 $ 250.00 45 Furnish and install 8 cane Ocotillo EA 1 $ 70.00 $ 70.00 46 lFumish and install Golden Barrel Cactus 10" diameter EA 0 $ 75.00 $ - Famish and install 5 gallon Fairy Duster EA 8 $ 8.00 $ 64.00 Furnish and install 1 gallon Autumn Sage EA 3 $ 9.00 $ 24.00 Furnish and install 1 gallon Red Yucca EA 2 $ 8.00 $ 16.00 Furnish and install 1 gallon New Gold Lantana EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - $Bacidill Furnish and install 1 gallon Purple Lantana EA 73 $ 8.00 $ 584.00 Furnish and install 1 gallon Baccharis EA 0 $ 8.00 $ - Branch Circuit Trench FT 550 $ 1.03 $ 56650 BC Trench FT 550 $ 0.62 $ 341.00 0k4 COST ESTIMATE Project no. 99-05 Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvement Project Median N ITEM NO. DESCRWnON UNIT QTY- UNIT PRICE QED PRICE 55 Service Lateral Trench FT 0 $ - $ - 56 1 Backfill Service Lateral Trench FT 0 $ - $ - 57 (1) 4" Service Lateral Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 58 12#101#12GRD 1/2-Conduit Fr 0 $ - $ - 59 14#101#12GRD 1/2-Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 60 12#8 6#121#12GRD 3/4-Conduit Fr 0 $ - $ - 61 14#10 2#121#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 62 16#12 1#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 63 12#121#12GRD 1/2"Conduit FI' 0 $ - $ - 64 14#121#12GRD 1/2-Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 65 12#8 4#101#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 66 2#8 4#10 2#121#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 67 4#10 4#121#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FI' 0 $ - $ - 68 2#8 2#121#12GRD 3/4"Conduit Fr 20 $ 5.09 $ 101.80 69 2#10 4#121#12GRD 3/4"Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 70 12#10 2#121#12GRD 1/2"Conduit Fr 0 $ - $ - 71 12#8 4#121#12GRD 3/4"Conduit Fr 0 $ - $ - 72 12#81#12GRD 1/2"Conduit Fr 90 $ 3.79 $ 341.10 73 12#10 6#121#12GRD 3/4-Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 74 14#9 2#10 2#121#12GRD 1-Conduit FT 0 $ - $ - 75 14#8 2# 121#12GRD 1 "Conduit FT 625 $ 6.84 $ 4,275.00 76 IFixture "A" EA 7 $ 550.03 $ 3,850.21 77 Fixture "B" EA 4 $ 361.27 $ 1,445.08 78 Fixture "C" EA 0 79 Receptacles EA 2 $ 76.79 $ 153.58 80 Meter Pedestal EA 0 $ - $ - 81 JCB 20-40Amp/1&210KAIC EA 0 $ - $ - 82 lGround Rod EA 0 $ - $ - 83 JUghting Contactors (20AMP) EA 0 $ - $ - 84 JPhotocell EA 0 $ - $ - 85 Time Clock EA 0 $ - $ - 86 JChristy Pullboxes EA 12 $ 73.42 $ 881.04 87 JPullboxes EA 1 $ 161.07 $ 161.07 88 IMiscellaneous Electrical Utilization Equipment LS 1 $ 1,211.86 $ 1,211.86 89 Provide a 1 year maintenance for all planting, irrigation and electrical/lighting elements in the project area. Guidelines provided by the City maintenance department and anadied forms LS 1 $ 2,400.00 $ 2,400.00 Sub Total: 10% Contingency TOTAL: $ 42,795.24 $ 4,279.52 $ 47,074.76 040 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: AD ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Calle Tampico/Avenida STUDY SESSION: Bermudas Traffic Signal Improvements, Project No. 2000- PUBLIC HEARING: 17 Accept Project No. 2000-17, Calle Tampico/Avenida Bermudas traffic signal improvements as 100% complete; and Authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and Authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $14,815.15, 35 days following the recordation of the Notice of Completion. Adequate funds are available (Account No. 401-709-609-553) in the project budget to pay the contractor retention and to close-out the construction phase of this project. The project is 100% funded with local developer impact fees. Subsequently, the project was bid without prevailing wage requirements. This project includes the construction and installation of a new traffic signal at the intersection of Calle Tampico and Avenida Bermudas. On June 19, 2001, the City Council awarded a contract in the amount of $143,161 to DBX, Inc. for the construction of Project No. 2000-17, Calle Tampico at Avenida Bermudas traffic signal improvements. The project's construction effort is now deemed to be 100% complete and is in compliance with the plans and specifications. Prior to filing the Notice of Completion, staff must receive authorization from the City Council to approve this project as 100% complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion. , 1 Y&. ro T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219e.wpd A final accounting of this Contract is as follows: Original Bid $143,161 .00 Contract Change Order # 1 (Add LED, Revise $3,790.45 Cabinet/Controller) Change Order # 2 (Time extension) $0.00 Quantity Variation/C.O. # 3 $1,200.00 TOTAL: $148,151 .45 Amount Paid to Date ($133,336.30) Liquidated Damages $0.00 TOTAL REMAINING FISCAL COMMITMENT: $14,815.15 Retention to be Released $14,815.15 The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Accept Project No. 2000-17, Calle Tampico/Avenida Bermudas Traffic Signal Improvements as 100% complete; authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $14,815.15, 35 days following the recordation of the Notice of Completion; or 2. Provide staff with alternative direction. RespeWLAy suboitted, Roy F. Step'hg6son, P.E. Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for Submission by: Thomas P. Genovese City Manager 145 T:\PW DEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219e. wpd T a 0 4,tt 4 4 Qum& AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) for the Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvements, Project No. 99-05B BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) and authorize staff to advertise for bid the Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvements, Project No. 99- 05 B. This project is currently identified within the City's approved Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 1999/2000 as a portion of the Jefferson Street ultimate improvements from State Route 1 1 1 to Avenue 54. The following represents the overall project funding and the remaining funding available within Fiscal Year 2001 /2002: FUNDING SOURCE TOTAL FUNDING FY 2001 /2002 State Local Partnership Program (SLTPP): $713,412 $19,366 City Infrastructure Funds': $2,882,008 $1,844,030 Art in Public Places $10,800 $7,800 CVAG Funding: $12,589,513 $5,1 12,262 TOTAL: $16,195,733 $6,983,458 The proposed Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape improvements are not eligible to receive funding from either the SLTPP or CVAG funding sources. Subsequently, the entire cost of these improvements will be borne by City Infrastructure Funds. The City has previously committed $1,332,190.00 of the available $2,882,008.00 toward its share of the street improvements including: construction, construction engineering, survey, material testing, and contingency. Therefore, an amount of $1,549,818.00 is currently available for the installation of the entire median island landscape improvements from Highway 1 1 1 south 1� 1Staff is requesting a change in funding from the use of infrastructure funds to Redevelopment Project Area No. 1 Capital Funds at the February 19, 2002 meeting. T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219f.wpd to Avenue 54, including the roundabout. The following represents the engineer's estimated project construction costs by municipal jurisdiction: Project Limits City of La Quinta City of Indio Ave 54 to Ave 50 (including roundabout) $782,451 Ave 50 North to City Limits (shared at $187,946 centerline) Ave 50 North to City Limits (shared at centerline) North City Limits to Highway 1 1 1 Total Estimated Cost Share: TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $187,946 $47,075 $970,397 $235,021 $1,205,418 Considering the engineer's estimated construction costs, the following represents the probable estimated construction budget: Activity City of La Quinta Construction: $970,397 Administration: $48,520 Inspection and Testing: $80,058 Subtotal: $1,098,975 Contingency: $109,897 Total: $1,208,872 City of Indio $235,021 $1 1,751 $19,389 $266,161 $26,616 $292,777 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION BUDGET: $1,501,649 As illustrated, the total estimated construction budget necessary to construct the proposed median island landscape improvements on Jefferson Street from Avenue 54 to Highway 1 1 1 is $1,501,649. The City of La Quintals estimated share is $1,208,872 and the City of Indio's estimated share is $292,777. 11 TAPWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219f.wpd 002 The City of Indio's contribution to the proposed improvements remains unresolved as of the writing of this report. Subsequently, the project will be bid in a manner that will clearly identify those improvements located completely within the City of Indio or within median islands shared by both Cities. This bid detail is necessary to pursue the proposed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for shared costs with the City of Indio and will allow the City of La Quinta to award all or part of the proposed improvements. It is staff's understanding that the funding source for the proposed landscape improvements may change from Infrastructure Funds to Redevelopment Agency Funds as addressed in another item on this same Agenda. Subsequently, the project will be bid as a prevailing wage improvement. On November 2, 1999, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $43,130.00 with the firm of David Evans and Associates to prepare plans, specifications, and engineer's estimates for Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvements from Avenue 54 to Highway 1 1 1 . The proposed landscape scheme for the Jefferson Street median improvements match the pallet for the medians completed on Washington Street, Avenue 50, Calle Sinaloa, Calle Tampico, and Avenue 52. Mounding will occur in the median at a height no greater than 18". Stamped concrete will be utilized at turn pockets and the median will be provided with lighting according to the City's approved median landscape pallet. The plans, specifications, and engineer's estimate (PS&E) are now complete and are available for review within the Public Works Department. Assuming authorization to receive bids on February 19, 2002, the following represents how the project is expected to proceed: Approval of PS&E/Authorization to Receive Bids Bid Period Approval to Award Construction Construction Period (120 days) Accept Improvements February 19, 2002 February 20, 2002 - March 18, 2002 April 2, 2002 April 22, 2002 - August 20, 2002 September 2002 14 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219f.wpd 003 The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) and authorize staff to advertise for bid the Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvements, Project No. 99-0513; or 2. Do not approve the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) and do not authorize staff to advertise for bid the Jefferson Street Median Island Landscape Improvements, Project No. 99-0513; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, 4R y F. Stephenson, P.E. terim Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese City Manager 14*1 TAPWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\O2O219f.wpd 1'. 004 T a 0 4hf 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL,/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Project No. 98-19, Area D, STUDY SESSION: Sagebrush, Bottlebrush, and Saguaro within Assessment District PUBLIC HEARING: N o . 2000-1 Accept improvements within Project No. 98-19, Area D, Sagebrush, Bottlebrush, and Saguaro within Assessment District No. 2000-1; and Approve the Final Adjusting Contract Change Order, Contract Change Order No. 6 (Attachment 1), in the amount of $17,559; and Authorize the City Clerk to file a "Notice of Completion" with the County Recorder; and Authorize the City Manager to reduce securities in lieu of retention to 5 %, and release remaining securities 35 days from the recorded "Notice of Completion." The following represents the approved project budget and funding sources: RDA Project Area #2 $ 1,143,493 Transportation Developer Impact Fee $ 145,827 Assessment District No. 2000-1 $ 318,280 TOTAL $ 1,607,600 14 3 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219g.wpd The following illustrates budget versus actual construction costs: Contract Item Original Base Contract Electrical Undergrounding - CCO# 1 Undocumented Utilities (T&M) - CCO# 2 Undocumented Utilities (T&M) - CCO# 3 Storm Drain/Sewer Conflict - CCO# 4 Install Irrigation Sleeves - CCO# 5 Budget Actual $ 977,232 $ 994,791 $ 80,000 $ 47,522 $ 20,000 $ 4,557 $ 20,000 $ 6,521 $ 139,000 $ 100,029 $ 618 $ 757 Totals $ 1,236,850 $ 1,154,177 As indicated above, adequate funding is available to close the project. Upon acceptance of this project the City will begin street sweeping operations in this area. This project will add 1.16 curb miles (6,146 linear feet) to be maintained. Approval of Contract Change Order No. 6 accounts for the various unit price items within the contract that either went over the estimated quantity or were less than the estimated quantity. The amount is indicated by the difference between the budgeted base contract amount and the actual base contract amount, $17,559. None. This project was constructed utilizing prevailing wage requirements. On June 20, 2000, the City Council awarded a contract to construct the Phase VI Improvements, Assessment District No. 2000-1, Project No. 98-19, Area D, to Granite Construction Company in the amount of $977,232.00. The contract provides for 180 consecutive calendar days in which to perform all tasks listed within the bid documents. On January 16, 2001, the City Council approved Contract Change Order No. 1 and No. 4. Improvements constructed under this contract included sewer main, storm drain, new street , surfaces, curb and gutter, sidewalk, sound attenuation wall, and undergrounding of overhead- ;J distribution power, cable and telephone lines. T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219g.wpd 002 A Notice to Proceed was issued to the Contractor on August 30, 2000 and stipulated 180 consecutive calendar days within the contract to complete the work. This would cause all work to be completed on or before March 1, 2001; the Contractor requested and received "substantial completion" status on February 9, 2001. However, the Contractor did not complete outstanding punch list items until several months later. The Contractor provided the City with the contract -required "notification of completion" on October 19, 2001; contract construction management consultant Mr. Tom Berg of Berg & Associates and City staff have concurred. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Accept improvements within Project No. 98-19, Area D, Sagebrush, Bottlebrush, and Saguaro within Assessment District No. 2000-1; approve the Final Adjusting Contract Change Order, Contract Change Order No. 6 in the amount of $17,559; authorize the City Clerk to file a "Notice of Completion" with the County Recorder; and authorize the City Manager to reduce securities in lieu of retention to 5%, and release remaining securities 35 days from the recorded "Notice of Completion;" or 2. Do not accept improvements within Project No. 98-19, Area D, Sagebrush, Bottlebrush, and Saguaro within Assessment District No. 2000-1; do not approve the Final Adjusting Contract Change Order, Contract Change Order No. 6 in the amount of $17,559; do not authorize the City Clerk to file a "Notice of Completion" with the County Recorder; and do not authorize the City Manager to reduce securities in lieu of retention to 5 %, and release remaining securities 35 days from the recorded "Notice of Completion;" or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submd, Roy F. St%phe on; P.E. Interim Publi Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager �- Attachments: 1 . Change Order No. 6 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219g.wpd I `j 003 ATTACHMENT 0 • U w5 INCOUORATED OF CONTRACT: Street Improvements Assessment District 2000-1 Project No. 98-19 Phase VI -Area D CONTRACTOR: Granite Construction Co. 38000 Monroe Street Indio, CA 92203 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 Pagel of 2 Pursuant to the terms of the original Contract Agreement, you are hereby directed to make the herein described changes or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications for this Contract. Unless otherwise stated all work shall conform to the terms, general conditions, and special provisions of the original Contract. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE "Final Adjusting" Change Order, this change order accounts for contract unit price items that when completed are either less than the estimated quantity or are more than the estimated quantity. Payment, per the contract, is based upon actual quantities installed. See. page 2 for a detailed breakdown of bid items. Previous Contract Amount Through Change Order No. 5 $ 17236,851.00 Add This Change Order 6 $ 17 559.00 Revised Contract Total $ 19254,410.00 By reason of this contract change order the time of completion is adjusted as follows: -0- days added/deleted to contract time. Submitted By: Date: Approved By: Date: We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, perform all labor, except as may be noted above, and perform all services necessary to complete the above specified work, and hereby accept as full payment the amount shown above, which includes all direct and indirect overhead expenses for any delays. Accepted By: Title: Contractor: Date: 15 �. 005 T:\PWDEPT\PROJECTS\98Pdcts\9819PhVl\Specs\Area D\CC06.WPD PAGE 1 OF 2 Bid Item No. Description Unit Price Est. Qty. Actual Qty. Difference 3 Pot Hole existing utility (Each) $ 225 8 22 $ 3,150 7 Asphalt Concrete Type A (tons) $ 27 2,498 2,102 $ (10,704) 8 Crushed Aggregate Base (tons) $ 12 2, 600 27733 $ 11597 9 Asphalt Concrete Overlay (tons) $ 31 365 425 $ 1,860 10 Concrete Curb & Gutter type A-6 (If) $ 13 6,120 6,146 $ 338 11 Concrete Driveway Approach (sf) $ 5 11,628 16,193 $ 22,825 12 Concrete Sidewalk (sf) $ 4 3,720 3,240 $ (1,920) 17 Replace Trench Patch (sf) $ 4 4,250 7,858 $ 143,432 18 Adjust Existing Water Valves (each) $ 525 19 20 $ 525 19 Adjust Existing Water Meters (each) $ 225 55 26 $ (6,525) 20 Adjust Existing Sewer Manhole (each) $ 235 15 14 $ (23 5) 21 Relocate Mail Boxes (each) $ 510 45 59 $ 7,140 23 Adjust Sewer Cleanouts (each) $ 350 3 4 $ 350 24 Concrete Cross Gutter (sf) $ 5 2,775 1,826 $ (4,745) 31 Storm Drain Manholes (each) $ 4,000 6 8 $ 8,000 32 Sand Filters (each) $ 7,500 2 0 $ (15,000) 34 18-inch reinforced concrete pipe 2000D (If) $ 63 335 281 $ (3,402) 35 27-inch reinforced concrete pipe 2000D (If) $ 53 .. 463 319 $ (7,632) 36 30-inch reinforced concrete pipe 2000D (If) $ 60 250 254 $ 240 37 37-inch reinforced concrete pipe 2000D (If) $ 60 1,454 1,322 $ (7,911) 38 8-inch vitrified clay pipe sewer main (If) $ 23 3,150 2,969 $ (4,174) 41 4-inch house laterals (each) $ 475 112 102 $ (4,655) 42 4-inch house laterals to main (each) $ 675 8 10 $ 1,080 Al 8-foot acoustical masonry wall (If) $ 175 520 651 $ 22,925 TOTAL $ 17.55911 006 T:\PWDEPT\PROJECTS\98Pdcts\9819PhVI\Specs\Area D\CC06.WPD PAGE 2 OF 2 T4 Ut 4 AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Approval of Contract Amendment No. 2 to Berg and Associates for Construction Management Services Associated with Assessment District 2000-1, Projects 98-19, Area A, B, C, D, and Prototypical Street BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 13 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve Contract Amendment No. 2 (Attachment 1) to Berg and Associates to provide extended Construction Management services to support Capital Improvement Projects 98-19, Area A, B, C, D, and Prototypical Street in an amount not -to -exceed $79,624. Available funding for these services was identified and approved as the project budget based upon the actual contract amount awarded by the City Council on June 20, 2000. The approved budget for construction management services is detailed as follows: Village Commercial (Area A), Cove Residential (Area B), and $ 442,543 Prototypical Street Improvements Westward Ho Residential (Area C) $ 141,167 Sagebrush, Bottlebrush, and Saguaro Residential (Area D) $ 97,723 TOTAL $ 681,433 Less the original Berg and Associates contract amount $ 357,558 Less contract amendment No. 1 $ 225,603 Less pending contract amendment No. 2 $ 79,624 Remaining Balance $ 18,648 As indicated above, adequate funding is available. None. These improvements are being partially funded by RDA funds and therefore must be bid specifying prevailing wage requirements. Therefore, there are no Charter City impacts. T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219h.wpd On July 7, 1998, the City Council approved the Fiscal Year 1998/1999 through 2002/2003 Five -Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). As part of this program, the Phase VI Improvements were identified as follows: Phase VI A - Village Commercial Area Phase VI B - Cove Area Phase VI C - Westward Ho Phase VI D - Sagebrush, Bottlebrush, and Saguaro The City Council also approved the project entitled "Village Development" which is the completion of a prototypical street (Calle Estado). On April 14, 2000, the City Council approved a Request for Proposals for construction management services for Capital Improvement Projects No. 98-19A, 98-19B, 98-19C, 98- 19D within Assessment District 2000-1 including the Village Prototypical Street; and approved the Consultant Selection Committee. On August 15, 2000 the City Council approved a professional services agreement with the firm of Berg and Associates to provide professional Construction Management services as outlined above in an amount not -to -exceed $357,558. On June 5, 2001, the City Council approved Contract Amendment No. 1 which extended the construction management contract an additional 100 calendar days to accommodate the completion of the Prototypical Street improvements and Area C (the Westward Ho area), plus an additional 30 days to close out any outstanding punch list items or contract issues. The contract for construction of improvements within the village commercial area (Area A), the cove residential area (Area B) and the Prototypical Street Improvements (Calle Estado) had an original duration of 200 consecutive calendar days. An additional 49 days were added by an approved change order with additional water main improvements to be reimbursed by Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) and another 6 days were added for inclement weather delays. The original contract completion date was April 21, 2001 and is now revised to June 16, 2001. However, the Contractor has failed to complete various items of work including punch list items within the specified contract time. Street lights on Calle Estado were not delivered until mid September. Area C (Westward Ho Area) had an original contract duration of 180 consecutive calendar days. Another 68 days were added to the contract time to allow utilities to clear the right -of- way and an additional 28 days were added to the contract with the approval of Contract Change Order No. 2, which added additional water main work to be reimbursed by Coachella TAPWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219h.wpd 002 Valley Water District. The original contract completion date was April 1, 2001, but was revised to July 9, 2001. The Contractor failed to complete various items of work and punch list items within the time specified. In both contracts, areas A, B, and C, the Contractor has liability with respect to failure to complete the project within the specified contract time. To what degree remains to be determined. The contractor is in the process of preparing his request for additional time based upon his time impact analysis which he intends to present to the City at a meeting scheduled for February 20, 2002. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve Contract Amendment No. 2 to Berg and Associates to provide extended Construction Management services to support Capital Improvement Projects 98-19, Area A, B, C, D, and Prototypical Street in an amount not -to -exceed $79,624; or 2. Do not approve Contract Amendment No. 2 to Berg and Associates to provide extended Construction Management services to support Capital Improvement Projects 98-19, A, B, C, D, and Prototypical Street in an amount not -to -exceed $79,624; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, '�n�• o F. Stephenson, P.E. I erim Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1 . Contract Amendment No. 2 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219h.wpd 003 ATTACHMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT: Phase VI Assessment District 2000-1, Project 98-19 CONSULTANT: Berg & Associates 302 W. 5' Street, Suite 210 San Pedro, CA 90731 CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2 Sheet 1 of I PROJECT NO. 98-19 A,B,C&D Pursuant to the terms of the original Contract Agreement, you are hereby directed to make the herein described changes or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications for this Contract. Unless otherwise stated all work shall conform to the terms, general conditions, and special provisions of the original Contract. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE Extend the performance of professional constriction management services to support Phase VI Assessment District 2000-1, Areas A, B, C, D and Prototypical Street, Project No. 98-I9 Previous Contract Amount Through Contract Amendment No. 1 $ 5835,161 Add this Contract Amendment No. 2 $ 79,624 Revised Contract Total S 662,785 By reason of this contract change order the time of completion is adjusted as follows: 210 days added to contract time. The revised contract completion date shall be: 02 /28/02 Submitted By: Date: Approved By: Date: We, the undersigned Consultant, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, perform all labor, except as may be noted above, and perform all services necessary to complete the above specified world and hereby accept as full payment the amount shown above. Accepted By: Title: Consultant: Date: 1�3 0 T:\PWDEPT\PROJECTS\98Prjcts\981SPhV1\C \B&A AmendNo 2.wod 111 T a 0 4bf 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL,/RDA MEETING DATE: BUSINESS SESSION: February 19, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: 14 ITEM TITLE: Approval to Award a Contract to R.J. Bullard STUDY SESSION: Construction, Inc. to Construct Project No. 99-05A Bridge Barrier and Railing Enhancements at the Jefferson Street Bridge over the PUBLIC HEARING: All -American Canal Approve the project budget, and award a contract in the amount of $120,040 to R.J. Bullard Construction, Inc. to construct Project No. 99-05A, Bridge Barrier and Railing Enhancements at the Jefferson Street Bridge over the All -American Canal; and Appropriate $37,136 from the Art in Public Places Fund for railing enhancements at the Jefferson Street Bridge over the All -American Canal. Based upon the actual bid received, the following represents the proposed budget for the work specified: Construction $120,040 Design (previously expended) $10,800 Inspection/Testing/Survey $10,503 Contingency $12,000 Administration $6,000 TOTAL $159,343 The Engineer's Estimate of probable construction cost was $70,000.00. Including design and support costs, the previous estimated budget for this project was $100,601. Since this is specialty work and is now separate from the overall project, the amount of the bid received ($120,040) is considered reasonable for the scope of work proposed. I5 TAPW DEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219d. Wpd The Jefferson Street Bridge over the All -American Canal is part of Project No. 99-05, Jefferson Street Improvements, Phase I - Avenue 54 to Highway 111. The following represents the project funding and sources: SB 300 (401-000-493-485) $713,41 1 .00 Infrastructure Funds (401-000-493-000) $2,882,008.00 CVAG Funding (401-000-466-481) $12,589,513.00 Art in Public Places (401-000-493-000) $10,800.00 TOTAL FUNDING: $16,195,732.00 Less prior expenditures $1 1,149,735.00 BALANCE $5,045,997.00 Per the Memorandum of Understanding between CVAG, La Quinta, and Indio, CVAG would fund 75 % of the cost of the standard bridge barrier and chain link railing and the City of La Quinta would be responsible for the remaining 25 %. Staff has communicated with CVAG regarding eligibility for project funding to construct the enhancements to the bridge barrier and railing. CVAG informed the City that as long as these elements do -not compromise the safety or integrity of their intended use they would qualify for the agreed upon 75 % funding associated with all improvements included in the project scope. As indicated, the Bridge Rail Enhancements will encumber $159,343. Of this amount, $10,800 has previously been expended from the Art in Public Places fund for design of the enhanced bridge barrier and rail. The balance to close this portion of the project would be $148,543. CVAG has given a verbal commitment to fund 75 % of $148,543 or $1 1 1,407, leaving a balance to be funded from the Art in Public Places fund of $37,136. Adequate funding is available ($183,277, Account #270-710-858-000) in the Art in Public Places fund to support the recommendation contained in this report. None. 1� �"f ki 002 TAPW DEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219d. wpd At the November 7, 2000 City Council meeting, the Council authorized staff to negotiate an Art Purchase Agreement with Navarrete Studios to provide artistic bridge railing designs for the Jefferson Street Bridge over the All American Canal. On February 20, 2001, the City Council approved an Art Purchase Agreement in the amount of $3,000.00 with Navarrete Studios to create artistic components, "similar to, but not the same" as the Washington Street bridge over the La Quinta Evacuation Channel, to be incorporated into the Jefferson Street Bridge barrier and railing over the All -American Canal. At the May 1, 2001 City Council meeting, the Council approved one of two submitted artistic conceptual designs and directed staff to finalize the design with Navarrete Studio. At the July 3, 2001 City Council meeting, the Council approved an expenditure from the Art in Public Places fund in the amount of $7,800 for RBF Consulting to convert the artist's conceptual designs into engineering construction drawings and to provide technical specifications for the same. The standard bridge barrier and chain link railing were included in the original scope of work for the Jefferson Street bridge over the All -American canal within Project No. 99-05, Jefferson Street Improvements - Phase I Avenue 54 to Highway 1 1 1 . Due to the length of time to review and approve the artistically enhanced barrier and railing, the window of opportunity for this type of work was no longer available without extending the contract with Granite Construction. Considering bid award on February 19, 2002, the following represents estimated project milestones: Recommend Award Notice to Proceed Construction Acceptance February 19, 2002 March 20, 2002 March 20, 2002 - June 5, 2002 June 18, 2002 15 3 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219d.wpd 00,1 The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve the project budget, and award a contract in the amount of $120,040 to R.J. Bullard to construct Project No. 99-05A, Bridge Barrier and Railing Enhancements at the Jefferson Street Bridge over the All -American Canal, and appropriate $37,136 from the Art in Public Places Fund for railing enhancements at the Jefferson Street Bridge over the All -American Canal; or 2. Do not approve the project budget, and do not award a contract to R.J. Bullard to construct Project No. 99-05A, Bridge Barrier and Railing Enhancements at the Jefferson Street Bridge over the All -American Canal, and do not appropriate $37,136 from the Art in Public Places Fund for railing enhancements at the Jefferson Street Bridge over the All -American Canal; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, 4 Y�. FOR o F. Stephenson, P.E. Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: T omas P. Genovese, City Manager T:\PW DEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219d. wpd 004 T 0 0 4hf 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL,/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Approval of Contract Change Order No. 10, Project No. 98-19, Area A, B, and Prototypical Street, Assessment District 2000-1 BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 160, STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve Contract Change Order No. 10 in the amount of $38,700 to provide CVWD requested additional water services to various vacant lots throughout the project area. The following table represents the approved project budget. Construction Inspection/Testing/Survey Construction Management Administration Contingency $4,425,431 $342,971 $442,543 $221,272 $543,222 Total $5,975,439 The following table represents actual and projected construction costs that would be assignable to the construction contingency account. Contingency Approved Contract Change Order's (incl. CVWD work) Pending Contract Change Order's Potential Quantity Increases (not incl. Bid Item 1 13) Potential Quantity Decreases Remaining Contingency Contract Change Order to be reimbursed by CVWD Net Remaining Contingency $543,222 ($351,676) ($39,355) ($10,982) $0 $141,209 $301,676 $442,885 Adequate funding is available to support the recommendation contained within this report. 16 TAPW DEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219i. wpd None. On June 20, 2000, the City Council awarded a contract to Granite Construction Company in the amount of $4,425,431 to construct improvements within Assessment District 2000-1, Project No. 98-19, Area A, B, and Prototypical Street. After Contract award, staff pointed out to representatives of CVWD that there are many vacant lots within the project boundaries that were not scheduled to receive domestic water service lines and therefore would require CVWD to open up the new street to make a tie-in to the new main line to provide service to those properties. There were an additional 60 residential lots to be supplied at the contract unit price of $525.00 each for a total of $31,500; and there were an additional 6 commercial lots which require 2-inch services to be supplied at the contract unit price of $1,200.00 each for a total of $7,200; for a combined total of $38,700 to be reimbursed by CVWD. The reason for this late submission to City Council for approval is that originally, it was acknowledged that this work would be accomplished as "additional quantity" under the respective bid item. However, that would make accounting difficult for the District to identify those areas added for reimbursement; therefore, this contract change order was prepared to quantify the additional areas added to the contract. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve Contract Change Order No. 10 in the amount of $38,700 to provide CVWD requested additional water services to various vacant lots throughout the project area; or 2. Do not approve Contract Change Order No. 10 in the amount of $38,700 to provide CVWD requested additional water services to various vacant lots throughout the project area; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. l6n T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219i.wpd 002 Respectfully submitted, oy F. Ste henson, P.E. Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: r' Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Contract Change Order No. 10 16 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219i.wpd 003 � `' ' ` � • I l ATTACHMENT CONTRACT: Street Improvements Assessment District No. 2000-1 Project No. 98-19 Phase VI -Area A & B CONTRACTOR: Granite Construction Co. 38000 Monroe St. Indio, CA 92203 Sheet 1 of 4 PROJECT NO.98-19 Revised Date: February 26, 2001 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 10 (Revised) Pursuant to the terms of the original Contrw Agreement, you are hereby directed to make the herein desai'bed changes or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications for this Contract. Unless otherwise stated all work shall conform to the terms, general conditions, and special provisions of the original Contract. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE , ADD WATER SERVICES — VACANT LOTS AND CALLE ESTADO As shown on the attached sheets, No.'s 1, 2 and 3, construct the following: * Bid Item No. W I, One (1) inch service; Sixty (60) units at $525.00 each or $31,500.00 * Bid Item No. W 3, Two (2) inch service; Six (6) units at $1,200.00 each or. $7,200.00 TOTAL $38,700.00 Previous Contract Amount Through Change Order No. 9__ $4,793,012.00 Add This Change Order$ 38,700.00 Revised Contract Total $4,631 ,712.00 By reason of this contract change order the time of oompletion is adjusted as Mows: Four (4) days added to contract time. Tie revised contract completion "-AM be: June 10, 2001(Fras Jane 6, 2001, CCO #5) Submitted Approved l We, the undersigned Contractor, hem glum care9td coMrsiderallorr to Ike ck wge proposed mind hereby a if this proposal is approved that we will provide all equipment, fw7ush all materials, perfor= all labor, except as maybe noted above, and perform all sovica necessary to complete the above specified work and hereby accept as fall p aYme nt the amount shown above, which inhales all direct and Indirect overhead a wnses for any delays. Accepted B; Contractor: Title: Mgg.C,.,''�.�,�. Date: Z /Z% ic I A6 3 FEB 16 2001�- TAMPiCO � _ • Y�iL w JL rlAM sr 1— s• cr + sm _ 4 126 � � JL • IVa V �► s a s s sa u n a I ,�►. i xea o sae p � A r pm pm Se ft 3 9 l 3 JL >i- JS d Z • + w r LL i7 � 3�i ilt 63� 3L 321 BIZ 14 p r jL 4 � t v i i St 7 WE f 31-633 s;i'MT w w' in lie qs y A ` L 9 • y � Va SIM • > 2 t 2�1 e i iN .4 � r 31 3 X7 7"— '.tt" 4 4 sari, lip 3l��M 7" u ^ nF 7� .. 3t—MIS 70, 7?2� t3 �+ or AC. 12"Ci71L/CIIC� 39-Imma s w ON n WE �1I1 s"s4e a := owl roe. 49 >•s _Y ire e..� .... .: 0106 e ' DESERT CLUE UNIT NQ.4 CALLE 7 " 6 r 4-3, 64 //�Y� { �{�!i� �'\'\j�Yj�'jJ�j i` ?1 4.�25'1�� 3TY 4i� } T�b 4 1� 1 5�•` ,�.' �i� Y k.' ."'xmr:t'r' ,.r-s;,•,,,'� y r.o'S4 FEB • 1 2001 • 71 49 WE • ����M.•�� '.n�l1l a 4tyr�Ta � -, tia � _ {1 r F��x ��1y M a r Q : 1�T us hs o X ,� y _ AVE1MA r ssus n � c W s mt o CD Ll SIMI 11 w 'S! ..�1 • is v l•1 t{I ... o p► • �. �I to .t 83 �D I 2 3 Aj5 7 9 9 1C 1 s>w 3 a e � � • CALLE fa" mot. ifM ESTApp C+4LlE N a � �. � I M�z �f■ 7� d i 2 3 f' 1 3 6 7 8 9 2 3 a 6 10 9 8an ' 6 -- si-r� 71.:aer �.�am 7 ztg m CALLE co 70 t i' sInra am ab nae7fWft s1-:era _ _ a s t 5 7CIn 1 3 4 rr a am am an w Sim DE�ERT CLUB UNIT NO.z CALLE • �— DESERT CLUB ,arm-2 am 1 2 3 11 a0 9 a �� 7 aw zis $k i Zu R 2� ;, 007 11ILM1115 =Y � V � w�f.. r?!w VOT �► ggY�•� at; l �7il► t;H. t .1 lii • j _�\, al*. 13 008 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: /(a ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Civic Center Campus Acknowledgment Area and the Pillars of the Community Application Forms RECOMMENDATION: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve the application forms for the Civic Center Campus Acknowledgment Areas and the Pillars of the Community Program. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Nominal design and printing costs which can be provided through the Community Services Department budget, Account #101-251-647-000. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: On September 19, 2000, the City Council approved an Art Purchase Agreement with artist William (Bill) Ware to provide three acknowledgment areas for the Civic Center Campus. The three areas would be designated to represent veterans, artists (celebrities) and sports figures. A set of recognition criteria was needed so that staff can begin soliciting names for the acknowledgment areas. At the August 7, 2001 City Council meeting, the City Council appointed a sub- committee comprised of Council Members Terry Henderson and Ron Perkins to meet and provide a set of criteria for full City Council consideration at a future date. The sub -committee met on August 23, 2001 to discuss the criteria for the Civic Center Campus acknowledgment areas. At the September 18, 2001 City Council meeting, the City Council discussed the application process and directed staff to draft r 16 J an application form incorporating Council comments presented at the meeting, as provided in Attachment 1. Also discussed at the September 18, 2001 City Council meeting was the Pillars of the Community Program. This program would recognize those individuals that have made a significant contribution to the La Quinta community. Individuals would be recognized by having their information presented in a "Book of Deeds" available at the City Clerk's Department. Attachment 2 provides a draft application form to be used by individuals to nominate a person for consideration as part of the Acknowledgment Areas. Attachment 3 is a draft application for the Pillars of the Community Program. Upon City Council approval of the application information, a formal application will be designed and a professional brochure will be prepared and presented to the community for possible nominees. The brochure and applications can be made available at City Hall, the Chamber of Commerce and on the City's web page. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the application forms for the Acknowledgment Areas and the Pillars of the Community Program; or 2. Do not approve the application forms for the Acknowledgment Areas and/or the Pillars of the Community Program; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully sgbmitted, Dome Horvitz/Kdmmunity Services Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.181.Civic Center Campus Acknowledgment Area Application.wpd 16 vU`o Attachments: 1. Minutes from the September 18, 2001 City Council Meeting 2. Draft Application for Acknowledgment Areas 3. Draft Application for the Pillars of the Community Program S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.181.Civic Center Campus Acknowledgment Area Application.wpd 1 11 ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Minutes 6 September 18, 2001 Council Member Sniff supported moving forward with the design to find out if construction of the sidewalk is feasible. He believed people will walk through the area, with or without a sidewalk, and that the City should try to make it safer. Council Member Adolph agreed. He felt the current condition is hazardous for people to use but stated he would not support anything that strips the mountain. He added he is waiting for the developer to restore the east side of the mountain to a more natural state.. Mayor Pena stated he supports moving forward with the design and determining further actions later. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to appropriate $16,874 from RDA Project Are No. 2 Funds and approve a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $9,840 with Warner Engineering for professional design services for a sidewalk on the north side of Highway 1 1 1 between Point Happy and the Cliff House Restaurant. Motion carried with Council Member Perkins voting NO. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2001-129. 2. CONSIDERATION OF THE CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS ACKNOWLEDGMENT AREA CRITERIA. Community Services Director Horvitz presented the staff report. Council Members Henderson and Perkins gave a brief report on how the subcommittee arrived at the proposed recommendations. In response to Council Member Perkins, Ms. Horvitz confirmed Merchant Marines who have served in active duty are recognized as veterans by the Department of Veterans Affairs. He requested they be added to the list. Council Member Adolph asked about the "honorably discharged" requirement. He also questioned who would be responsible for determining qualified recipients. 1. After a brief discussion, Council concurred to revise the requirement for a "DD- 214 form" to "honorably discharged." Council Member Henderson noted a nomination form"with questions related to the criteria will be required for each nominee. Additionally, nomination papers for Artists and Sports figures will require signatures of 10 La Quinta citizens; City Council Minutes 7 September 18, 2001 nomination papers for Pillars of the Community will require signatures of 25 La Quinta citizens. Council Member Adolph voiced concern that the Civic Center Campus might look like a cemetery and stated he preferred a monument, such as a "Mitchell Page Memorial" in honor of all veterans. Council Member Sniff stated he felt the Council's intent to recognize "veterans" is more limited than the Department of Veterans Affairs' definition. He also questioned "reserves" being included. Council Member Henderson agreed the acknowledgment area should be limited to veterans of normal military service. As for "reserves," she felt there should be some level of recognition for those who have made a commitment there when needed. to be After a brief discussion, Council concurred to include "reserves" who have served a minimum of six years of honorable service. In reviewing the criteria for artists, Council Member Sniff questioned how national, state, or local recognition of artists and sports would be recognized and expressed concern about the extreme subjectivity in regard to contribution to the City. He also felt there should be a minimum age for signing nomination papers. After a brief discussion, Council concurred on a minimum age of 18. Council Member Henderson noted national, state, or local recognition would come from some type of an award or medal. The criteria requires the person to have contributed to the City's image or quality of life. Council Member Sniff suggested compiling a list of competitive sports for the sports category instead of changing the category to athletics. He also suggested further thought be given to an appropriate acknowledgment for Fred Wolf, La Quinta's first Mayor. In response to Council Member Adolph, Council Member Perkins stated subcommittee felt the acknowledgment for Mr. Wolff should be more the rather than a section of the Bear Creek Bike Path. specific Council Member Henderson stated she felt a "Book of Deeds" would appropriate to have on display at City Hall and Council concurred. Ma or be noted the City is also compiling a historical photo album. y Pena City Council Minutes 8 September 18, 2001 Robert Tyler, 44-215 Villeta Drive, spoke in support of the "honorably discharged" criteria and commented on the need to recognize people in the education field. Mayor Pena noted "Pillars of the Community" will include a wide variety of fields. Council concurred to direct staff to redefine the criteria for the Civic Center Campus acknowledgment areas based on Council's comments and to draft an application form. Council further concurred to deal with an appropriate acknowledgment for Mr. Wolff as a separate issue. 3. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPOINTMENT TO THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INFORMATION EXCHANGE BI-MONTHLY WORKSHOPS. There were no changes to the staff report as submitted and on file in the City Clerk's Office. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to appoint Mayor Pena to serve for three meetings on the Chamber of Commerce Information Exchange Committee. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2001-130. 4. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 29894-2, COUNTRY CLUB OF THE DESERT, NRI-CCP I, A DELAWARE LLC.. There were no changes to the staff report as submitted and on file in the City Clerk's Office. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING CONDITIONAL FINAL MAP APPROVAL OF TRACT 29894-2 AND AUTHORIZING A TIME EXTENSION FOR SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO VALIDATE THE APPROVAL. It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to adopt Resolution No. 2001-1 12 as submitted. Motion carried with Council Member Adolph ABSTAINING due to a potential conflict of interest. J ATTACHMENT 2 City of La Quinta Acknowledgment Area Application Candidate's Information: Name: Address: City: Telephone Number: Zip Code: Select the Acknowledgment Area category in which candidate is to be recognized: Artists* Sports Figures** Veterans** Time frame when the candidate was a City of La Quinta resident: (Must be a minimum of three years) From: Nominating Individual's Information: Name: Address: City: Telephone Number: Program Criteria: To: Zip Code: *Artists: The following categories will be considered: Painting, sculpting, tile work, performing arts, architecture and landscape architecture. Candidates must have received national, state or local recognition and contributed to the City of La Quinta's image. The Nomination form must be signed by a minimum of ten (10) La Quinta residents. **Sports Figures: All formally recognized sports will be considered. Candidates must have received national, state or local recognition and contributed to the City of La Quinta's image. The Nomination form must be signed by a minimum of ten (10) La Quinta residents. ***Veterans: All branches of the Military as identified by the Department of Veterans Affairs will be considered along with Reservists that have served a minimum of six (6) years and Merchant Marines that have served in Active Duty are eligible for consideration. Proof of an Honorable Discharge status is required. For more information on this program, please contact the Community Services Department at 777-7090. City of La Quinta Acknowledgment Area Application Candidate's Name: Acknowledgment Area Category: (For Veterans) Branch of Military Service: Years of Service: Please provide proof of Honorable Discharge upon submission of application. (For Artists and Sports Figures) National, state or local recognition received: Contribution to the City of La Quinta's Image: I hereby support the nomination of to be considered for the City of La Quinta's Acknowledgment Areas. I understand that I must be a La Quinta resident that is over the age of 18 in order to offer support for the candidate. Name: (Please Print) Address: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. ATTACHMENT 3 City of La Quinta Pillars of the Community Application Candidate's Information: Name: Address: City: Telephone Number: ( ) Zip Code: Time frame when the candidate was a City of La Quinta resident: (Must be a minimum of three years) From: To: Nominating Individual's Information: Name: Address: City: Telephone Number: ( ) Program Criteria: Zip Code: Candidate must have received City-wide recognition; contributed significantly to the development of the City of La Quinta; and the Nomination form must be signed by twenty five (25) La Quinta residents over the age of 18. For more information on this program, please contact the Community Services Department at 777-7090. City of La Quinta Pillar of the Community Application Candidate's Name: Significant contribution to the City of La Quinta's development: I hereby support the nomination of to be considered for the City of La Quinta's Pillar of the Community Program. I understand that I must be a La Quinta resident that is over the age of 18 in order to offer support for the candidate. Name: (Please Print) Address: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. � cu COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 Approval of a Resolution Establishing a Sales Price for 201h Anniversary Glasses and Establishing a One Day Business License Fee for the Arts and Crafts Show RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: 17 Adopt a Resolution of the City Council establishing a sales price for the 20th Anniversary Celebration glasses; and Establish a $10.00 fee for a one day business license for those participating in the 20th Anniversary Celebration Arts and Crafts Show. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Funds raised by the sale of the 20th Anniversary Celebration glasses will be used to offset the original cost. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The 20th Anniversary Celebration Committee had recommended that commemorative glasses be produced for the City's 20th Anniversary, as was done for the City's 10th Anniversary. The City's purchase of 20th Anniversary Celebration glasses was approved the City Council on December 18, 2001. The 20th Anniversary Celebration Committee has recommended the glasses be sold at the April Village Faire event, the Chamber of Commerce Mixer, the La Quinta Arts Foundation "Art under the Umbrella" event and at other City functions. The cost of an individual glass is $4.20. Staff is recommending that the sale price of $5.00 be formally established or an alternative price as established by the Council. A resolution reflecting the establishment of a sales price for the 20" Anniversary Celebration glasses is attached utilizing the $5.00 price. The 20th Anniversary Celebration Committee (Committee) also recommends a $10.00 one -day business license be issued on April 27, 2002 to those vendors wishing to sell items at the Arts and Crafts Show to be held at the Senior Center. The La Quinta Municipal Code, Chapter 3.28.430 (Attachment 1) provides: "The City Council, for good and satisfactory cause shown, may order the issuance of a license for less than the fees herein provided or without the payment of any fee whatsoever". A typical City business license for those selling craft items is $15.00. The Committee is recommending a $10.00 fee in order to allow those vendors that normally do not sell their goods the opportunity to participate in the day's event. The one day business license will be good only for April 27, 2002 for the Arts and Crafts Show. Those vendors that have a La Quinta business license will be charged $10.00 for the booth space. A4 provided in Attachment 2, the City Council has approved a partial waiver of fees for Mainstreet Marketplace vendors in the past. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council establishing a sales price for the 201h Anniversary Celebration glasses and establish a $10.00 fee for a one day business license for those participating in the 20th Anniversary Celebration Arts and Crafts Show; or 2. Do not Adopt a Resolution of the City Council establishing a sales price for the 20th Anniversary Celebration glasses and/or establish a $10.00 fee for a one day business license for those participating in the 20th Anniversary Celebration Arts and Crafts Show; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully,submitted, Dod orvitz 'mmunity Services Director S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.186.Resolution for Glasses.wpd Li 2 Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Chapter 3.28.440 of the La Quinta Municipal Code 2. City Council Minutes of September 20, 1994 1� S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.186.Resolution for Glasses.wpd RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SALES PRICE FOR 20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION GLASSES WHEREAS, the City Council has purchased 20th Anniversary Celebration Commemorative Glasses to promote the City's 20th Anniversary; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has elected to sell the 20th Anniversary Celebration Commemorative Glasses to recover production costs; and, WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to establish a sales price for the 20th Anniversary Celebration Commemorative Glasses to facilitate their sale and to direct the City Manager, or his designee, to provide for their sale and distribution for promotional purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . The City of La Quinta hereby establishes the sales price of the 20th Anniversary Celebration Commemorative Glasses at $5.00 each. 2. The City Manger, or his designee, is hereby directed to control sales of the 20th Anniversary Celebration Commemorative Glasses and distribution for promotional purposes. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 19th day of February 2002, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.186.Resolution for Glasses.wpd .� ,- � 4 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON , City Attorney City of La Quinta, California S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.186.Resolution for Glasses.wpd V L 5 3.28.410 ATTACHMENT 1 of ten. For the purpose of this section, "concession" shall be any amusement ride, booth, exhibit, stall, tent, trailer, or stand which charges any fee for the ride, service or product offered. Circuses. $200.00 per day. Commercial Filming. On city streets or other city property, as follows: Persons Employed at Location Rate per Day 1-3 $ 100.00 4-6 200.00 7-9 400.00 10 and over 600.00 Traffic -control costs or any additional costs as required by the chief of police shall be paid entirely by the applicant. Contractors. Every person engaged in the business of contracting which requires a state contractors' license shall pay a business license as follows: A. General contractors, $100.00 annual fee; B. Subcontractors, $50.00 annual fee; C. Business licenses for general contractors and subcontractors may be obtained semi-annually. Living Accommodations. Every person transacting or engaged in the rental of four or more dwelling units in any apartment house, roominghouse, houses for rent, or other living accommodations shall pay an annual fee of $12.00 per unit, provided that hotels and motels shall be on the gross receipts basis, Class B. Mobile Home, Trailer and Recreational Vehicle Parks. $12.00 per space per year. Peddlers or Solicitors. A. Principal, $200.00 annual fee; B. Each additional solicitor or peddler, $10.00 quarterly. Sales Representatives. Every person engaged in the business of solicitor of order for sales or services by a nationally franchised business (such as AVON) wherein solicitation only occurs by previous appointment, shall pay a business license fee of $25.00 per year. Taxicabs. A. Taxicab operator's license, $60.00 annual fee; B. Taxicab vehicles, per vehicle, $25.00 annual fee. (Ord. 31 § 1 (part),1983: Ord.16 § 1 (part), 1982) 3.28.420 Coin -operated machines. Every person operating one or more vending machines, coin -operated amusement device, shuffle- board, juke box or other similar device, shall pay a license fee based on the entire gross receipts from all of such machines operated within the corporate limits of the city in accordance with the schedule set forth in Section 3.28.390, Class B. (Ord. 31 § 1 (part), 1983: Ord.16 § 1 (part), 1982) 3.28.430 Waiver or reduction of taxes or penalties by city council. The city council, for good and satisfactory cause shown, may order the issuance of a license for less than the fees herein provided or without the payment of any fee whatsoever. (Ord. 31 § 1 (part), 1983: Ord. 16 § 1 (part), 1982) 3.28.440 Rules and regulations. The collector may make such rules and regulations not inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter as may be necessary or desirable to supplement or clarify such provisions or aid in their enforcement. Such rules and regulations shall be known as "Business License Rules and Regulations," shall be placed in written form and numbered consecutively, and shall be approved by the city attorney before becoming effective. A copy of each such "Business License Rules and Regulations" shall be filed with the city manager and with the city clerk. (Ord. 31 § 1 (part),1983: Ord.16 § 1(pan),1982) 82 ' ATTACHMENT 2 City Council Minutes 17 September 20, 1994 La Quinta Sports -Complex site and Council requested AirTouch to address some issues of concern and report back to Council. The two specific issues not addressed by AirTouch were negotiating of the $500/month-lease payment and the underground placement of the equipment container. Therefore, staff recommended denial of the project. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/McCartney to deny the request by AirTouch Cellular to locate a monopole and equipment container at the La Quinta Sports Complex, based on the lack of response to the Council's request for negotiations and for underground placement of the equipment container. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 94-200. �9. CONSIDERATION OF EXTENDING THE ADJUSTED BUSINESS LICENSE FEE FOR SPECIAL EVENT VENDORS. Mayor Pena referred to the staff report which advised that the business license fees are charged annually based on the calendar year with the current annual fee for a special event/street vendor being $15.00. The Mainstreet Marketplace events stretch over two calendar years and on October 5, 1993, Council approved a partial waiver of fees for the vendors making the fee for all six events between October 1993 and December 1994 a total of $18.75. Staff recommended that new vendors for the upcoming event be granted the same fee waiver and noted that business license fees are being reviewed under the comprehensive fee study. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter to approve the extension of adjusting business license fees for special event vendors. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 94-201. 10. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF REPLACEMENT OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER AND AUTHORIZATION TO COMMENCE SELECTION PROCESS. Mayor Pena advised that this item would be continued until after the public hearings. (See Page No. 31) 11. CONSIDERATION OF SELECTION OF VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE FOR SAL LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CONFERENCE -- IN LONG BEACH OCTOBER 23-259,1994. Mayor Pena advised that he plans to attend the conference and Council Member McCartney advised that he may attend. AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: l9 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Authorizing Staff to Enter into an Agreement with the County of Riverside Treasurer -Tax Collector for the Purpose of Purchasing Tax -Default Property Within the City of La Quinta and Appropriation of up to $13,600 for the Purpose of Purchasing the Property RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council authorizing staff to enter into an Agreement with the County of Riverside Treasurer -Tax Collector to purchase tax -default property within the City of La Quinta and appropriate up to $13,600 for the purpose of purchasing the property. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The purchase of the tax -default property would result in an allocation of up to $13,600 from Unallocated Reserves from the General Fund. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: As in years past, the City has been informed by the County of Riverside that tax - defaulted property within the City is being placed up for auction on March 11, 2002. In the past, the properties put up for auction have mostly been reclaimed by the property owners, but the City has purchased one tax -default parcel. Staff has inquired regarding two parcels that are within the City and found that one parcel has been reclaimed. Staff is asking for authorization to enter into an Agreement to purchase the parcel as noted in Attachment 1. Staff has engaged the services of a title company to do a title search for all encumbrances associated with this parcel. As of this date, that search has not been completed. Should the search reveal that the encumbrances exceed the purchase price, staff will not proceed with the County process. 1�U G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\RDAtaxdefpur.wpd FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: Alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council authorizing staff to enter into an Agreement with the County of Riverside Treasurer -Tax Collector to purchase tax -default property within the City of La Quinta and appropriate up to $13,600 for the purpose of purchasing the Property; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council authorizing staff to enter into an Agreement with the County of Riverside Treasurer -Tax Collector to purchase tax -default property within the City of La Quinta nor appropriate up to $13,600 for the purpose of purchasing the Property; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Helm munity Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Letter from the County of Riverside 2. Vicinity map showing location of parcels G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\RDAtaxdefpur.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF PARCELS OF LAND FROM THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 4, Part 6, Division 1 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County did instruct the Tax Collector of Riverside County to sell certain parcels of land for which deeds to the State have been filed with the Controller of the State of California as provided in Sections 3511 et. seq. of said Revenue and Taxation Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta hereby states its objection to the public sale of one of those parcels; and WHEREAS, it is desirous that one of those parcels be purchased by the City of La Quinta; and, WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta, is desirous of obtaining the fee title of the parcel for certain public purposes including, without limitation for park site, street, and the possible future exchange of this property for other property more advantageously situated for such public purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California that in accordance with the provisions of Division 1, Part 6, Chapter 8 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, the City of La Quinta, a municipal corporation of the State of California, in conjunction with the Redevelopment Agency, does hereby offer to purchase and appropriate funds to purchase the following parcel: Assessor's Parcel No. Purchase Price 649-071-008-9 $7,819.98 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta that in accordance with the provisions of Division 1, Part 6, Chapter 8, of said Revenue and Taxation Code does hereby agree to buy said parcel for the purchase price above mentioned plus advertising and Lot Book Report costs as offered by the Riverside County Treasurer and Tax Collector, and the Property Services Manager is hereby authorized to execute and deliver the agreement for purchase of other n necessary documents. I b v �! !` 3 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CC2002TaxDefaultProp City Council Resolution 2002- Riverside County Tax Land Purchase Adopted: February 19, 2002 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 19th day of February, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 1� G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CC2002TaxDefaultProp ()C4 OFFICERS PAUL MCDONNELL TREASURER ROCHELLE JOHNSON ASSISTANT TAX COLLECTOR KEN KIRIN ASSISTANT TREASURER TOM MULLEN CHIEF DEPUTY December 26 2001 PAUL MCDONNELL TREASURER City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, Ca 92253 Attention: Jerry Herman Community Development Director Re: Parcel Numbers 649071008-9 & 770020003-3 Dear Mr. Herman: ATTACHMENT #1 CHIEF DEPUTY MIKE FULKERSON CHIEF DEPUTY GARY COTTERILL CHIEF DEPUTY DON KENT CHIEF DEPUTY QU\ RfCE��� BAN ' 2 2002 We are in receipt of your inquiry regarding acquiring tax -defaulted property. The City of La Quinta may acquire the above referenced tax -defaulted parcels under a Chapter 8 Agreement of Sale for the minimum purchase prices as follows: Assessment Number Purchase Price 649071008-9 $7,819.98 Assessment Number Purchase Price This purchase price was determined in keeping with Section 3698.5 (a) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, State of California. Parcel number 770020003-3 has been redeemed and is no longer available for purchase. In order for the City of La Quinta to enter into an Agreement of Sale for these parcels, we would need a Resolution from your City Council stating that the City objects to the public sale of these parcels. The Resolution should further show an offer to purchase the property, including the purchase price, legal description, assessor's parcel number, and the public purpose for which the land is to be devoted. It should also include a statement that the costs of giving notice shall be paid by the City. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASURER �. 1�2 4080 LEMON STREET, 4TH FLOOR * P.O. BOX 12005 * RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502 WWW.COUNTYTREASURER.ORG * (909) 955-3900 * (760) 863-8900 * FAX (909) 955-3906 City of La Quinta Page 2 December 26, 2001 In compliance with Section 3793.6 (a) of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, the City is required to pay for the legal notice tentatively published in the Press Enterprise Newspaper. Should the property be redeemed after the first publication nullifying the Agreement to purchase, the City would still be responsible for the publication costs incurred. Also, pursuant to Section 3793.6 (a) of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, this office requires lot books. These lot book reports are necessary, as it supplies us with the names of Parties of Interest, that must be notified of the pending sale pursuant to Section 3799 of the aforesaid code. This charge is not refundable, should the property be redeemed nullifying the Agreement. Once the Agreement of Sale has been completed correspondence will be sent requesting funds within 14 days. Should payment not be received within the time allowed the Agreement of Sale would be cancelled. We would appreciate receiving the Resolution to purchase the properties from your Board immediately. It would be advisable to contact our office and confirm that the Resolution has been received. Properties scheduled to be sold at auction will not otherwise be removed from the tax sale. If your City Council decides against offering to purchase these parcels, we would appreciate a letter so stating in order to close our file on this matter. Should you elect not to purchase by Agreement, the law does not restrict you from bidding on the property at public auction. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. Yours truly, 9i�x . ana ka4pt& a Christina Quintero Tax Enforcement Unit (909) 955-3827 If j 01 7 �Srp MwATE� —CVCy D b hy �Ya--�iy rosaa a si O O — � b 4-%Ae r—� I I ATTACHMENT #2 /O rw:r /n/ 12 : 13 14 15 0 I • r Ip • 00� N Y2 25 25 7 (� I^ ® /4 P3 ni 028Ael %Of 39SO /5 24 n t7 i`JDJI �rJ /G 25 y 2e 9/ /7 26 • /B 27 • • /g 28 0 P4Aor ®29 ° lasr! ,rf�aO 53 3r 3B • 2/ 50 iA y Pu 72 t 0!?4 _ 36 31 O Q NNE I s I 8 v tp 1 1 +.! $ 0 CV T4t!t 4 4 QUA irk AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: / COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: Consideration of a Shop and Dine PUBLIC HEARING: Business Retention Program RECOMMENDATION: Approve a 2002 shop and dine business retention program and authorize staff to work with Kiner Goodsell, the City's marketing firm, on completing and implementing the program. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: An amount of $24,000 is budgeted for this program in the Fiscal Year 2001-02 Annual Budget as part of the City's Marketing Plan and Kiner Goodsell's contract services agreement. The funds are available in Economic Development - Supplies & Services Account #101-103-605-822 (Marketing Services). CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: The City Charter allows the City "to utilize revenues from the general fund to encourage, support and promote economic development." The business retention program would support and promote local businesses in the City of La Quinta. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The business retention program for 2002 is part of the "Business Retention" component included within the City of La Quinta Marketing Plan. This particular program is identified in the plan as the "Gold Q Program," and is intended to attract more business to restaurants and retailers during the "off season" (i.e., summer months) and reward consumers by offering discounts and prizes. In the past, the program has taken the form of discount coupon books and discount cards. This year, as part of their contract services agreement with the City, Kiner Goodsell is charged with reinstating a business retention program under a new name and classier theme. Kiner Goodsell has prepared a one -page description of the proposed new program, which outlines the main concept, communication methods and l� advertising slogans (Attachment 1) . The concept involves a "passport to savings" program whereby consumers would utilize a "passport" with tear -out coupons to receive discounts at participating La Quinta shops and restaurants. In addition, consumers would also receive a "stamp" from the participating business directly on their passports. Multiple stamps would afford them the opportunity to win a variety of prizes. The grand prize is proposed as a cruise to Alaska. The advertising would bring together the passport and Alaskan cruise ideas to promote the program using a "travel" theme. Kiner Goodsell has been advised that this item is on today's agenda. A representative will be prepared to give a presentation on the proposed business retention program. Staff is seeking Council approval of the program, as proposed or with modifications. Upon approval, staff would continue to work with Kiner Goodsell on completing the program, and implementing it in the summer of 2002. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the 2002 shop and dine business retention program, with or without modifications, and authorize staff to work with Kiner Goodsell on completing and implementing the program; or 2. Do not approve the 2002 shop and dine business retention program; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. 2002 Shop and Dine Business Retention Program (Concept) 002 Attachment 1 finer /4, oodsell CITY OF LA QUINTA 2002 SHOP & DINE BUSINESS RETENTION PROGRAM CONCEPT: The basic concept is a "passport to savings" program in which the participant benefits in two ways: 1) They receive a "passport" with tear -out coupons inside to the participating shops and restaurants. This is similar to the coupon book of the first year of this program, but classier — packaged in the passport format. Then, each time they shop or dine at a participating business, the business can "stamp" the front of their passport. If the participant gets all the boxes stamped, they can enter for a chance to win, say, a cruise to Alaska. We would try to get the cruise donated by a local travel agent — possibly even AAA. The stamp portion of the program could also use the "tier" approach in which, if the participant has the first line stamped, they can enter to win dinner for two at a restaurant; if they have both the first and second lines stamped, they can enter it at that point for dinner and golf or a spa treatment at KSL; and if they get the first, second and third (final) line stamped, they can enter it for the cruise. This concept offers a number of reasons to shop/dine La Quinta, and offers fun options for tying in the advertising. COMMUNICATION PROGRAM: Ads in local publications Radio Ads Mailer for Passport Banners/Billboards at strategic places Posters (giant postcards) at outlet POSSIBLE ADVERTISING SLOGANS/THEMES: 1. More La Quinta More dining. More shopping. More La Quinta. Use your passport to tour and enjoy the many more experiences in La Quinta. 2. From La Quinta to Alaska. Headlines like - "Shop and dine here and be rewarded with a bonus... Go there." 3. La Quinta Summer Cooler Shop & dine in La Quinta, win a trip to Alaska! 4. La Quinta... Your passport to more! !1� AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2001 CONSENT CALENDAR: Consideration of an Appointment of Two City Council Members to Serve on the Civic Center Art Purchase Committee RECOMMENDATION: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Appoint two City Council Members to serve on the Civic Center Art Purchase Committee to select Civic Center Art during the La Quinta Arts Festival; and authorize spending up to 10% over the $7,500 amount budgeted, if needed; and appropriate funds. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The sum of $7,500 has been budgeted in the Civic Center Art Purchase Account #101-101-703-899. Authorization to spend up to 10% over the $7,500 available would allow Committee Members discretion in selecting art work that is just above the actual budgeted amount. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Since 1989, the City has been selecting art work from the La Quinta Arts Festival (Festival) to be displayed at City Hall. Two City Council Members in conjunction with two Members of the Cultural Arts Commission will view the art work at the Festival, which will be held March 14-17, 2002, for consideration of art purchases for City Hall. Historically, the Civic Center Art Purchase Committee has met the first day of the Festival, selected a piece of artwork for the Civic Center, and the art work has been delivered to City Hall after the Festival. 9v The following City Council members have participated on the Civic Center Art Purchase Committee: 2001 Mayor Pro Tem Sniff and Council Member Adolph 2000 Mayor Pena and Council Member Henderson 1999 Council Members Adolph and Sniff 1998 Mayor Pena and Mayor Pro Tern Henderson 1997 Council Members Adolph and Sniff 1996 Council Members Adolph and Henderson 1995 Council Members Cathcart and Perkins 1994 Mayor Pena and Council Member Sniff The Cultural Arts Commission selected two representatives at their February 8, 2001 meeting to participate on this year's Civic Center Art Purchase Committee. The two Cultural Arts Commissioners are Elaine Reynolds and Rosita Shamis. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Appoint two City Council members to serve on the Civic Center Art Purchase Committee to select Civic Center Art during the La Quinta Arts Festival, and authorize spending up to 10% over the $7,500 amount budgeted, if needed, and appropriate funds; or 2. Do not participate in this year's selection of art work for City Hall; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Rep jtfullytubmitted, ie Horv' z, • ommunity Services Director Approved for submission by: r Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.184.Civic Center Art Purchase Committee.wpd T a 4bf 4 4a�rw COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: ITEM TITLE: February 19, 2002 Consideration of Participation in an Amicus Brief to the U. S. Court of Appeals in 99 Cents Only Store v. Lancaster Redevelopment Agency, U. S. District Court, Central District of California, Case No. 00-7572 SVW RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve participation in an Amicus Brief to the U. S. Court of Appeals in 99 Cents Only Store v. City of Lancaster Redevelopment Agency, being prepared for the League of California Cities and the California Redevelopment Association by the law firm of McDonough, Holland & Allen. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The law firm of McDonough, Holland & Allen, located in Oakland, California, is working with the League of California Cities and the California Redevelopment Association to prepare an amicus brief to the U. S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, in 99 Cents Only Stores v. City of Lancaster Redevelopment Agency. The amicus brief will voice the objection of California cities to a federal court ruling in favor of 99 Cents Only Stores. The case is described in detail in Attachment 1. Briefly, the Lancaster Redevelopment Agency entered into a DDA to develop a shopping center within its Amargosa Redevelopment Project. The center includes Costco and 99 Cents Only Store. In 1998, Costco informed the center's owner and the Lancaster RDA that it planned to expand its store, and if the expansion could not be accommodated within the center, it would look for another site, either within or outside of Lancaster. Lancaster feared that this move would adversely impact the City's sales tax revenue, as well as leave behind an empty 130,000 square foot building. The only solution acceptable to Costco would be for Costco to expand into the existing 99 Cents Only Store; however, 99 Cents Only Stores refused to relocate to any sites proposed by the Lancaster RDA. The RDA then began proceedings to acquire the 99 Cents Only Store's lease via eminent domain by adopting Resolutions of Necessity in June 2000. The 99 Cents Only Stores then filed suit in Federal court, challenging that the proposed taking was not a public use. The Lancaster RDA filed motions to dismiss the suit on the basis that the suit should have been filed in State court under California Eminent Domain law and that the case was not ripe for federal review. The Federal court denied the RDA's motions. However, before the Lancaster RDA took any further steps to acquire the 99 Cents Only Store's lease, Costco decided it would not expand after all. Therefore, the Lancaster RDA rescinded the Resolutions of Necessity in December 2000; no condemnation action was ever filed. Despite this, 99 Cents Only Store continued to pursue its federal court action. The Lancaster RDA moved to have the case dismissed because the action had been rendered moot, but the Federal court rejected the motion. The Federal District Court granted summary judgement to 99 Cents Only Stores and permanently enjoined the Lancaster RDA and the City of Lancaster from "...initiating eminent domain proceedings against the real property being occupied by 99 Cents Only Stores and permit expansion of Costco onto that property." This decision is currently on appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court. Of concern to the League of California Cities and the California Redevelopment Association is the precedent set by this case. This ruling could encourage parties to circumvent the State's procedures for challenging a taking by filing a separate action in Federal court, thus forcing cities to litigate on two fronts. In addition, this ruling could be extended to limit the taking of properties for redevelopment purposes. Therefore, the League of California Cities and the California Redevelopment Association are requesting the support of California cities in the appeal of this case. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve participation in an Amicus Brief to the U. S. Court of Appeals in 99 Cents Only Store v. City of Lancaster Redevelopment Agency, being prepared for the League of California Cities and the California Redevelopment Association by the law firm of McDonough, Holland & Allen; or 2. Do not approve participation in an Amicus Brief to the U. S. Court of Appeals in 99 Cents Only Store v. City of Lancaster Redevelopment Agency, being prepared for the League of California Cities and the California Redevelopment Association by the law firm of McDonough, Holland & Allen; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Kathy Jenson, City Attorney Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Memorandum from McDonough, Holland & Allen AUTHORIZATION OF REPRESENTATION I hereby authorize Thomas A. Douvan, of McDonough, Holland & Allen to represent the City of La Quinta as an Amicus curiae in 99 Cents Only Stores v. Lancaster Redevelopment Agency and City of Lancaster, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals No. 01-56338. 1 understand that there is no financial requirement for our participation. Signature Name (Print or Type) Address City/State/Zip Phone Please mail me a copy of the completed brief. Yes / No (circle one) . Please return this form to: Thomas A. Douvan McDonough, Holland & Allen VIA FACSIMILE: (510) 839-9104 004 Jan-22-02 11:39am From-RUTAN 714-546-9035 McDonough, Holland & Allen A PAg-L--Sf0F*— &X*Poa..r*-sv MEMORANDUM ATTACHMENT TO: ALL CALWORNIA CITY A.TTORN.EyS FROM: Thomas A. Douvan, Esq. � RE Amicus Brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 99 Cents OnLy Stores v. Lancaster Re evelQpplent A en (U.S. Dist. Ct., Central District of California, Case No. 00-07572 SVW) DATF7 January 10, M02 INTRQ)P=0N We request your City join in an amicus brief we are preparing to the Ninth Circuit in the anal of the above -referenced case. The U_S. District Court granted summary ______�_____..__ _.-_� -- $ t'Y judgment to 99 Cents y Stores and permanently enjoined the Lancaster Redevelopment Agency and the City of Lancaster from{ `'.. . initiating eminent domain proceedings against.the real property being occupied by 99 Cents (Orly Stores] so long as the purpose or effect of such proceeding is to displace 99 Cents [Orly Stores] and permit the expansion of Costco onto that property " I However, the Lancaster Redevelopment Agency never fled a complaint in eminent domain, and never went beyond a resolution of necessity passed as a first step to acquiring the property. The federal court therefore unnecessarily decided the issue in the context of a moot question. The federal courfs injunction is also overbroad, and purports to bind the City of Lancaster as well as the Lancaster Redevelopment Agency. Cities should join the League of California Cities and the California Redevelopment Association in voicing a stt'ong objection .in an a- micas brief to permit a party to circumvent the state procedures for challenging a taking by filing a separate action in federal court. When presented with the case initially, the District Count should have abstained from exercising its jurisdiction. Later, when. the Lancaster Redevelopment Agency dropped its plan to pursue a condenuiation action, the District Court should have dismissed the case as moot_ Moreover, even when it reached the merits, the District Court incorrectly decided the case by ignoring longsumding precedent established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Berman v. Parker 348 U.S_ 26 (19 ) which permits a Redevelopment Agency to acquire unblighted properties to advance legitimate goals of redevelopment. The District Court also misapplied other important U.S. 1 Copies of the opinion are available online on Lexis and Westlaw. The cite IS 2001 U.S. Dist_ Lexis 9894; 2001 WL 811056, 006 01-22-02 11:32 RECEIVED FROM:714 546 9035 Jan-22-02 11:39am From-RUTAN 714-546-9035 T-716 P.03/07 F-442 NicDwwwbh, Hoi2aIVC1 & Rltrn MEMORANDUM Page 2 Supreme Court precedent, including Kgwaii Housing Au ►oritLv Iylid if , 67 U.S. 229 (1984)_ Finally, the injunction that was issued was overbroad in several respects. It purports to enjoin any taking in the future if the purpose or effec is to displace 99 Cents Only Stores. It should not have been issued against the City of Lancaster_ BRIEF DE5CRIPTIQN OF CASE The Redevelopment Plan for the Amargosa Redevelopment Project was adopted in 1983, The Project ArCa comists of 4pproxirnately 4,60U acres. Based on substantial evidence, the City Council adopted the Redevelopment Plan by an ordinance which contained findings consistent with the Community Redevelopment Law that the Project Area was blighted. The Plan was amended in 1994 to comply with A01290, and again in 1997 to extend The rime period for the exercise of eminent domain. No new territory was added to the Project Area.. The Lancaster Redevelopment Agency entered into a DDA for the developatmt of a shopping center mown as the "Power Center" which included such users as Costco, Wabnart, fiome$ase, and, later, 99 Cents Only Stores to name a few. While the shopping center has been an adrnitted success, there are other shopping centers in Lancaster that have been successful at various times but have lost major tenants. This resulted in vacant buildings a,1Id a deterioration of the condition of the surrounding areas and the reestablishment of blight. In 1998, representatives of Costco informed the owner of the Power Center and the Lancaster Redevelopment Agency that it was looking to expand its store, and if its expansion could not be accor= nodated on -site, that Costco would look for another site, either in or out of Lancaster. The City calculated that relocatian of the Costco store outside Lancaster would create an imatediate loss of tax revenues, and further, would crew a vacant 130,154 square foot facility, causing a detrimental impact on the Power Center. The only solution acceptable to Costce which also satisfied building code requirements was ex ansion into the 99 Cents Only Stores site_ However, 99 Cents Only Stores reused to negotiate to relocate to an alternative sites tes propposed by the Lancaster Redevelopment Agency. Therefore, the Lancaster Redevelopment Agency took the first steps to acquire the 99 Cents P q t Only Stores lease through condemnation proceedings, adopting Resolutions of Necessity in June 2000. However, before the Lancaster Redevelopment Agency proceeded any further with condemnation proceedings, 99 Cents Only Stores filed suit in federal district court in ] my 2000, raising numerous constitutional challenges and objections to the right to take. The Complaint generally alleged that the proposed taking was not a public use. The Agency filed motions to dismiss, contending that (1) 99 Cents Only Stores had an adequate remedy at law in state court under Califorria. Eminent Domain Law, (2) the matter was not ripe for 2 00 007 01-22-02 11:33 RECEIVED FROM:714 546 9035 Jan-22-02 11:40am From-RUTAN 714-546-9035 T-716 P.04/07 F-442 MCi.. OM)Ugh. I- 011411d &- Allea MEMORANDUM Page 3 federal review and in any case, the federal court should abstain based on widely accepted principles of federal abstention. The Agency's motions were denied without explanation. Before the Lancaster Redevelopment Agency took any further steps to acquire the 99 Cents Only Stores' lease through eminent domain, it became apparent for other reasons that the Costco expansion would not work at the subject location. Therefore, the Redevelopment Agency rescinded the resolutions of necessity in December 20W. It is important ro reiterate that no can enlna -on action was ey r filed bar the Laieasler-Redevel©-gent Agency. Nevertheless, 99 Cents Only Stores persisted in pursuing its federal court action_ The Lancaster Redevelopment Agency again r>'tQved to have the case dismissed because the action had been rendered moot. The District Court rejected the mootness argument. Plaintiff and Defendant filed cross -motions for summary judgnaent. The primary issue was whether any future .hypothetical taking of 99 Cents Only Stores' leasehold interest would violate the "public use" clause of the Fifth Amendment_ The District Court granted 99 Cents Only Stores' motion for summary judgment and denied the Agency's cross -motions. This is the decision currently on appeal to the Ninth Circuit for which your amicus participation is respectfully sought. WHY THIS CASE MERITS M ATIEhMON The District Court's permanent injunction was issued in a complete vacuum: there simply never was a taking, because no eminent domain action was ever filed. Moreover, even if the case had proceeded in state court, that is where these issues should have been resolved. Public agencies should be permitted to pursue eminent domain actions without having to litigate on two fronts. The state courts are perfectly capable of resolving constitutional questions such as "public use" in the context of a properly filed eminent domain aeon. Kowever, by deciding this case, the District Court is encouraging parties to forum -shop, and to race to federal court to challenge a taking, even where none has occurred and may never occur. Moreover, even though the District Court's opinion purported to rely only on the federal ''public use" doctrine, the opinion delves deeply in California eminent domain law- For purposes of federal -state relations, the federal courts ought not make pronouncements about TVpublicuser in the context of a case which was never ripe, and was ultimately mooted by the Agency's rescinding of its resolutions of necessity and decision not to file any eminent domain action. Its decision on "public use" totally ignores the key U.S. Supreme Court decision directly on point, Berman v. Par -er, bra. Berman held that non- bbghted properties, such as the 99 Cents Only Stores leasehold interest arguably was, can properly be acquired in furtherance of a redevelopment project and transferred to ether private interests. The District Court's failure to deal with this r? f nog 01-22-02 11:33 RECEIVED FR4M:714 546 9035 Jan-22-02 11:40am From-RUTAN 714-546-9035 T-716 P.05/07 F-442 MCDO,10i4gh. Holland & Allea MEMORANDUM .Page 4 precedent in this context is a glaring omission worthy of emphasis by public agency amicus support. The District Court's opinion represents a trend by courts of late to limit the power of redevelopment to advance important public purposes. See, e.g., 'The Fight Over Might," California Lawyer (January 2002), p. 11. It is particularly troublesome that it was decided by a federal court in the absence of any eminent domain proceedings. ISSuRs QN WIEICH AMICUS ASSISTANCE WOULD 13E 13Q.EFLJi. Our proposed .issues for review are as follows: 1. Should the trial court have abs#aini?d f om exercising federal jurisdiction in this case? 2_ Should the trial court have dismissed the case as moot once it became obvious that the Redevelopment Agency would not pursue eminent domain proceedings? I Did the trial court err in finding that the Redevelopment Agency could not acquire the subject property bemuse it was not currently blighted, in derogation of the Supreme Courts holding in Berman Y. Parker? 4. Was the injunction improvidently granted because the "case or controversy" requirement was not met, and was it overbroad in purporting to bind the City of Lancaster, and preventing any future condemnation where the "effect' of such proceedings is to displace 99 Cents Only Stores? WHY MPU LSS S ARE OF MATQEI Sf JCANU TO CIDES Cities have an obvious interest in permitting redevelopment within their limits. Moreover, cities have are interest in seeing redevelopment agencies put'sue resolutions of necessity and other pre -condemnation activities without the fear of inviting federal court challenges to such activifi.es which may never result in an eminent domain action being filed, but may nevertheless result in pemanent injunetiorts against therm.. In addition, cities should seek to overturn a nl"g which ort its face may be extended to prevent taping all but the currendly most blighted properties in pursuance of legitimate governmental goals. THE CITIES' COMMON INTEREST IN nESE L.SSUES The District Court's actions in. 99 Cents Only Stores v. Lancaster Redevelopment Agency have potentially negative ramifications for all public agencies to California which exercise the power of eminent domain. All cities have a common interest in the decision's reversal_ 20 09 01-22-02 11:34 RECEIVED FROM:714 546 9035 Jan-22-02 11:41am From-RUTAN 714-546-9035 T-716 P.06/07 F-442 McDonough, HILAh `d & Ailen MEMORANDUM WHAT AMICUS SUPPORT CAN ADD Page 5 An Amicus brief fronn the cities will bring home to the Ninth Clr ut the widespread effect this decision .may have upon Cahfornia cities' ability to promote the objectives of redevelopment_ Therefore, while the Lancaster Redevelopment Agency's brief will present an effective argument for the .reversal of this particular decision, the cities' Amicus support will bring home to the Ninth Circuit the importance of reversal, AN T CIPATED FTLINSCHEDULE The opening briefs are currently due on February 25, 2002, although the record from the lower court has not yet been prepared and thus a brief extension may be requested_ An Arnicus brief must be filed within seven days after the filuig of the principal brief by the party whose position the ami-cus support, er later if permitted by leave of court_ F.R.A-P. 29. We would propose seeking leave of court to file within one week after February 25, 2002, i_e., by March 5, 2002, or possibly shortly thereafter dependirng upon the Ninth Circuit's ruling on Lancaster's request for an extension for the purpose of completion of the record. We therefore request that cities wishing to join in an Amkus brief return their aulthori,Zations to the undersigned. by February 15, 2002, City Attorneys wishing to have their naives appear on the brief should so specify, and should provide their California State bar number - CONCLUSION NCLUSION We flunk this is a matter of widespread interest to all cities, and that Amicus, assistance from California cities will be of great help in obtaining reversal of this poorly reasoned case. Please join with the League of California Cities, the California Redevelopment Association, and us in supporting the City of Lancaster and the Lancaster Redevelopment Agency. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or need further information_ We look forward to receiving your support. Very truly yours, J .0 Thomas A. Douvan TADAdm Enclosure Letter re anucu$ support Q191 01-22-02 11:35 RECEIVED FROM:714 546 9035 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Banners for the Village RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Dependent upon direction from the City Council, City banners for the Village area could cost up to $4,010. Funds for this program are available in Fiscal Year 2000-01 Capital Improvement Program, Seasonal Signage Program. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the December 4, 2001 City Council meeting, the City Council considered banners for the Village area. Patriotic banners were selected and have been ordered. Also considered at the December 4 meeting were City banners for the Village Area. The City banners would provide an entry notification to the Village as well as a contrast to the patriotic banners. The proposed text "Welcome to the Village of La Quinta" can be modified to present a message the City Council deems appropriate. The cost for the City banners is approximately $90 each. The banner material is white nylon with the City seal appliqued to each side. A gold fringe can be added to all four sides of the banner. Color samples of the nylon and gold fringe are provided as Attachment 1. The City logo used on the banner would be the same logo as found on the current City flags. A sample of the proposed banner is provided as Attachment 2. Possible locations for the City banners could be on poles 9 and 13, as provided in Attachment 3. The City Council may determine other locations for the City banners. Once the number of City banners is determined, staff will place the order. It is anticipated the City banners will be shipped within four weeks from date of order. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the City banner and authorize the expenditure of funds to purchase the determined number of banners to be placed in the Village; or 2. Do not select the City banner; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Res ctfull submitted, V Do ie Horvitz, munity Services Director Ap roved for submission !Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Color Samples for Banners 2. City Banner Sample 3. Calle Estado Light Pole Layout � 0 �G2e S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.187.Banner Program.wpd ATTACHMENT 1 co Im 10 O z ul CD "T1 0 z Ul U) Ul o o "n 70 c dr) ATTACHMENT 2 o� 5 ,-j) Z�-i I N W L-'-J Z ATTACHMENT 3 4 MWE 110, -� BUSINESS SESSION ITEM: J ORDINANCE NO. 364 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA ASSIGNING ZONING TO 50 ACRES GENERALLY BOUNDED BY MILES AVENUE ON THE NORTH, COACHELLA VALLEY STORMWATER CHANNEL ON THE SOUTH, WASHINGTON STREET ON THE WEST AND INCO CENTURY SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION ON THE EAST CASE NO.: ZONE CHANGE 2001-105 LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5th day of February, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for La Quinta Redevelopment Agency for review of a Zone Change to change the zoning designation on 50 acres generally located at the southeast corner of Miles Avenue and Washington Street, north of the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, and more particularly described as: APNs 604-040-012, 604-040-013, 604-040-023 and 604-040-037 WHEREAS, said Specific Plan has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-63), in that an Environmental Assessment (EA 2001-436) was prepared for Specific Plan 2001-055 and found that although the proposed project will have environmental impacts, all impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings recommending approval of said Zone Change: 1 . The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan, and the Land Use Map for the General Plan and surrounding development and land use designations, ensuring land use compatibility. 2. The Zone Change will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, as it has been designed to be compatible with surrounding development, and conform with the City's standards and requirements. 3. The Zone Change is compatible with the City's Zoning Ordinance in that it supports the development of Low Density Residential, Medium Density and Tourist Commercial uses. 21 Ordinance No. 364 Zone Change 2001-105 Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 2 4. The Zone Change supports the orderly development of the City. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California that it does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. PURPOSE. To rezone a portion of land generally located at the southeastern corner of Miles Avenue and Washington Street, from High Density Residential and Park and Recreation to Tourist Commercial, Medium Density Residential and Park and Recreation for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as contained in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of. SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL. This Zone Change has complied with the requirements of the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended) and adopted by City Council Resolution 83-68, in that the Community Development Director has determined that the proposed Zone Change will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4: POSTING. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three public places designated by Resolution of the City Council, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council this 19t" day of February, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PEIVA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 210" Ordinance No. 364 Zone Change 2001-105 Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 3 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California Ordinance No. 364 Zone Change 2001-105 Adopted: February 5, 2002 EXHIBIT "A" Irl Lh M N SACity Clerk\Ordinances\Gateway.wpd BUSINESS SESSION ITEM: ORDINANCE NO. 365 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA CHANGING 14 ACRES OF LAND CURRENTLY DESIGNATED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF AVENUE 52 AND JEFFERSON STREET CASE NO.: ZONE CHANGE 2001-104 TOLL BROTHERS INC. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5th day of February, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for Toll Brothers, Inc. for review of a Zone Change to allow Neighborhood Commercial zoning on a 14 acre site at the northeast corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings recommending approval of said Zone Change: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan, the Land Use Map for the General Plan and surrounding land use designations, ensuring land use compatibility. 2. The Zone Change will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, as it has been designed to be compatible with surrounding development, and conform with the City's standards and requirements. 3. The Zone Change is compatible with the City's Zoning Ordinance in that it proposes a Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center within the standards of the Zoning Ordinance and of Specific Plan 1990-016, Amendment No. 1. 4. The Zone Change supports the orderly development of the City. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California that it does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. PURPOSE. To rezone a portion of land generally located at the northeastern corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street, known as Parcel No. 1 of Lot Line Adjustment 2001-355, from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and that it does approve General Plan Amendment 2001-081 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as contained in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of. 210 Ordinance No. 365 Zone Change 20.01-104 - Toll Brothers, Inc. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 2 SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL. This Zone Change has complied with the requirements of the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended) and adopted by City Council Resolution 83-68, in that the Community Development Director has determined that the proposed Zone Change will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4: POSTING. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three public places designated by Resolution of the City Council, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council this 19t' day of February, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) 4 Ordinance No. 365 Zone Change 2001-104 - Toll Brothers, Inc. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California -0 17) 4,1 v Ordinance No. -U.6 5 Zone Change 2001-104 - Toll Brothers, Inc. Adopted: February 5, 2002 Exhibit 9 PROPOSED Vl\ EXHIBIT "A" EXISTING Exhibit 8 21j" S:\City Clerk\Ordinances\To11Bros .WPD BUSINESS SESSION ITEM: ORDINANCE NO. 366 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA ASSIGNING PRE -ANNEXATION ZONING TO 816 ACRES GENERALLY BOUNDED BY AVENUE 58 ON THE NORTH, AVENUE 60 ON THE SOUTH, MADISON STREET ON THE WEST AND MONROE STREET ON THE EAST; AND THE EAST SIDE OF MONROE STREET, BETWEEN AVENUE 59 AND AVENUE 61 CASE NO.: ZONE CHANGE 2001-103 T D DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5th day of February, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for TD Development for review of a Zone Change to allow 173.5 acres currently designated Medium Density Residential under Specific Plan 218 to Low Density Residential, 74.9 acres of Medium -High Density Residential to Medium Density Residential, Golf Course on 133.3 acres designated Open Space in the Specific Plan, 14.2 acres of Commercial designated land under the Specific Plan to 10 acres of Community Commercial, and 4.2 acres of Neighborhood Commercial, and 420 acres currently designated Agriculture under the County General Plan to Low Density Residential; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings recommending approval of said Zone Change: 1 . The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan, and the Land Use Map for the General Plan and surrounding development and land use designations, ensuring land use compatibility. 2. The Zone Change will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, as it has been designed to be compatible with surrounding development, and conform with the City's standards and requirements. 3. The Zone Change is compatible with the City's Zoning Ordinance in that it supports the development of single family residential homes, golf course and commercial projects within a planned community. 4. The Zone Change supports the orderly development of the City. Ordinance No. 366 Zone Change 2001-103 - TD Desert Development Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California that it does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. PURPOSE. To rezone a portion of land generally bounded by Avenue 58 on the north, Avenue 60 on the south, Madison Street on the west and Monroe Street on the east; and the east side of Monroe Street, between Avenue 59 and Avenue 61, known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 764-180-001, -002, -003, -0041 -005, -006, 764-190-011, -002, -003, -004, -005, -006, 764-200-001, -002, -003, -004, -005, -006, -007, 764-210-001, -002, -003, -004, -005, -006, 764-240-0021 -003, -004, -005, 764-290-001 and -002 as follows: 173.5 acres currently designated Medium Density Residential under Specific Plan 218 to Low Density Residential, 74.9 acres of Medium -High Density Residential to Medium Density Residential, Golf Course on 133.3 acres designated Open Space in the Specific Plan, 14.2 acres of Commercial designated land under the Specific Plan to 10 acres of Community Commercial, and 4.2 acres of Neighborhood Commercial, and 420 acres currently designated Agriculture under the County General Plan to Low Density Residential, and as contained in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of. SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL. This Zone Change has complied with the requirements of the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended) and adopted by City Council Resolution 83-68, in that the Community Development Director has determined that the proposed Zone Change will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4: POSTING. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three public places designated by Resolution of the City Council, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council this 19th day of February, 2002, by the following vote: Ordinance No. 366 Zone Change 2001-103 - TD Desert Development Adopted: February 5, 2002 Page 3 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 227 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 Discussion of Conceptual Library Program Elements RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: On July 5, 2000, the City Council approved and adopted the Fiscal Year 2000/2001 through Fiscal Year 2004/2005 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The Municipal Library is identified to receive funding for design during Fiscal Year 2000/2001. On July 17, 2001, the City Council approved and adopted the Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 through Fiscal Year 2005/2006 CIP. The Municipal Library is identified to receive funding for phase I construction during Fiscal Year 2002/2003. The following table represents the anticipated funding needed for the Municipal Library: FUNDING SOURCE FY 2000/2001 FY 2001 /2002 FY 2002/2003 ANTICIPATED FUNDING DIF - Library $525,000.00 $100,000.00 $3,639,440.00 $4,264,440.00 As illustrated, $625,000 is currently available for the design of the Municipal Library. An additional amount of $3,639,440 is anticipated to be available for phase 1 construction of the Municipal Library in Fiscal Year 2002/2003.' The following represents the currently approved Municipal Library budget: ' Staff is continuing to seek State and Federal grants for funding. S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.185B.LibraryProgram.wpd CATEGORY AMOUNT Administration: $55,000.00 Design/Engineering: $570,000.00 TOTAL: $625,000.00 CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: Construction for the Municipal Library is currently proposed to be funded with 100% locally generated developer impact fees. The City of La Quinta is not required to advertise the proposed improvements with prevailing wage requirements. Cost savings may be realized during the construction phase of the project. Should grant funds be received for this project, the conditions associated with the funding source will be evaluated as to the method in which the project is bid for construction. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: On November 6, 2001, the La Quinta City Council approved a contract with the M.W. Steele Group Inc. (Architect) to provide planning and design services for the La Quinta Library, to be located on approximately 1.25 acres at the northeast corner of the Civic Center Campus. The project includes the construction of a 20,000 square foot building shell with a first -phase library interior build -out of approximately 10,000 square feet. The balance of interior space will receive basic floor, ceiling and wall finishes and may be available for other civic uses until such time as the library is expanded to its full 20,000 square foot capacity. Staff met with the architect to begin the process of identifying the programming needs of the La Quinta Library. Programming needs are defined as the facility requirements in which to accommodate the services offered at the Library. The current La Quinta Library offers several programs which include the children's story hour, literacy tutoring, homework assistance and others. The basic programming needs were identified by staff with input from M.W. Steele Group, Inc. as the firm has designed and built several libraries. On November 27, 2001, a formal kick-off meeting for the library project was attended by City staff, Riverside County Library staff and the architects to review the project schedule and to discuss the preliminary programming needs. On December 12, 2001, a programming workshop was held with the above referenced parties. At this meeting, the physical space needed for each program element was identified. Due to the facility possibly being built in two phases, the program elements were identified for both a 10,000 square foot building and 20,000 square foot building. ��*}} V 662 SACommunity Services\CCReports\CC.185B.LibraryProgram.wpd Attachment 1 provides a comparison of the existing La Quinta Library, a 10,380 square foot facility and a 20,000 square foot facility. As identified in Attachment 1, the actual square footage of the facility does not equal the square footage of the assignable floor area. The assignable floor area is defined as the amount of space that will be dedicated to library functions, such as book racks, desks, tables, stands, computers, etc. The remaining non -assignable square footage includes utility areas such as entry ways, restrooms, janitor closets and electrical equipment. Attachment 2 is a Library Division Square Foot Summary statement for a 10,380 square foot library. This attachment indicates the square footage assigned to each programming element. The percentage of assignable floor area for each element is based upon a national standard for a library of this size. The following areas have been identified as necessary programming elements for the La Quinta library: Audio Visual Library Browsing Area Children's Library Circulation Services Fiction Collection Non Fiction Collection Periodicals Collection Public Meeting Rooms Reference Services Spanish Collection Young Adult Services The public meeting rooms identified as a programming element will serve many functions such as literacy tutoring, homework tutoring, and other small class activities. It is anticipated that the rooms will be able to be divided into smaller rooms to accommodate space required per activity. One issue to note is that computer stations are not identified in a specific location. However, they will be dispersed throughout each section of the library to accommodate all users. This is recommended by library professionals as it allows computer access to many groups with specific interests. It is anticipated that each computer will have Internet access. Attachment 3 provides a breakdown of each of the divisions within the programming elements. The "N/A" represents the non -assignable space in the facility, which are areas that are not assigned to specific library functions. Attachment 3 focuses on the relative size of specialized program components. It must be pointed out that the current La Quinta library provides many services in spaces that J SACommunity Services\CCReports\CC.185B.LibraryProgram.wpd serve multiple programming needs; for example the children's workroom, the literacy center and the homework center may all use the same space during the day. The following table provides a review of the square footage of the first phase of the La Quinta Library design and its uses: Square Footage Purpose 7,785 square feet Library Space 2,595 square feet Non -Assignable Square Footage The first phase of library construction will produce a 20,000 square foot building containing an approximately 10,380 square foot library. It is anticipated that the programming elements identified in Attachment 3 will be included in the facility. Upon completion of the second phase of the library building, each of the program areas will be expanded. The information provided in this report is being presented to inform the Council of the technical aspects of the proposed library facility. Staff is seeking comments regarding concerns the Council may have regarding the programming elements or additional elements the City Council may desire as part of the facility. Following Council direction, a public meeting will be held in which the public and organizations such as the Friends of the La Quinta Library will be invited to provide input regarding the programming needs of the library. After the public meeting, the architect will begin the design of the facility. It is anticipated that three design concepts will be presented for City Council consideration and that the exterior design of the library facility will be similar and complementary to the Senior Center and City Hall architecture. ReApectfullk submitted, Dodie Horvitz Community rvi es Director Approved for submission by: I Arm 0 _K150- Thomas P. Genovese City Manager Attachments: 1. Library Program Comparison 2. Library Division Summary 3. Library Space Summary v SACommunity Services\CCReports\CC.185B.LibraryProgram.wpd ATTACHMENT 1 X' o 0 w 00 �- 0 0 �• � 0 0 r y O 00 00 0 cn w A A rp H N• N• N• � O N 00 � t►� A n p O � O O 000 N ; N � O Library Division SgFt Summary ATTACHMENT 2 DIVISION Percent LIBRARY DIVISION SgFt of Total AUDIO-VISUAL LIBRARY 244 3 % BROWSING 226 3% CHILDREN'S LIBRARY 29013 26% CIRCULATION SERVICES 19458 19% FICTION COLLECTION 782 10% LIBRARY ENTRANCE 84 1 % NON-FICTION COLLECTION 858 11% PERIODICALS COLLECTION 508 7% PUBLIC MEETING ROOMS 353 5% REFERENCE SERVICES 762 10% SPANISH COLLECTION 180 2% YOUNG ADULT SERVICES 317 4% Net Assignable Square Footage: 79785 100% Non -Assignable Square Footage (@ 25% of Gross): 2,595 Gross Square Footage: 10,380 A Libris Design Building Program La Quinta Library 10,000 sf Report Printed on: 12/17/2001 12:27:49 PM Page 1 of 1 2,2) J Library Space SgFt Summary LIBRARY Space Name AUDIO-VISUAL LIBRARY AV Collection & Seating New AV Display BROWSING New Book Display CHILDREN'S LIBRARY Children's Collection & Seating Children's Entrance (Interior) Children's On -Line Public Access Catalog (OPAL) Children's Program Area Children's Reference Collection & Seating Children's Rest Room Children's Workroom Juvenile Collection & Seating CIRCULATION SERVICES Branch Manager's Office Combo Circulation/Reference/Children's Desk Computer/Telecommunications Room Custodial Sink & Storage Room General Library Storage Room Mechanical Equipment Room Staff Entrance & Lobby Staff Lounge Staff Rest Rooms Staff Workroom FICTION COLLECTION Fiction Collection & Seating LIBRARY ENTRANCE Friend's Book Sale Area Public Entrance & Lobby A Libris Design Building Program Report Printed on: 12/17/2001 12:30:56 PM Space 244 N/A 226 474 N/A N/A 210 385 N/A 155 789 184 253 28 76 150 N/A N/A 200 N/A 567 782 84 N/A ATTACHMENT 3 DIVISION 244 226 2,013 1,458 782 84 La Quinta Library 10,000 sf Page 1 of 2 230 LIBRARY Space DIVISION Space Name LIBRARY ENTRANCE 84 Public Rest Rooms N/A NON-FICTION COLLECTION 858 Non -Fiction Collection & Seating 858 PERIODICALS COLLECTION 508 Back Issue Periodical Collection 378 Current Magazine & Newspaper Display & Seating 130 PUBLIC MEETING ROOMS 353 Conference Room 243 Study/Tutoring Room 110 REFERENCE SERVICES 762 On -Line Public Access Catalog (OPAC) 140 Reference Collection & Seating 464 Reference Desk 158 SPANISH COLLECTION 180 Spanish Language Collection & Seating 180 YOUNG ADULT SERVICES 317 Young Adult Collection & Seating 317 Net Assignable Square Footage: 7,785 Non -Assignable Square Footage (@ of Gross):25 2,595 Gross Square Footage: 10,380 A Libris Design Building Program Report Printed on: 12/17/2001 12:30:56 PM La Quinta Library 10,000 sf Page 2 of 2 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: IJ MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA January 8, 2002 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Abels who lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Richard Butler, Tom Kirk, Steve Robbins, Robert Tyler, and Chairman Jacques Abels. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez, Planning Manager Christine di lorio, Senior Engineer Steve Speer, Planning Consultant Nicole Criste, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: A. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to reorganize the Agenda as follows: Public Hearing Items A, F, G, I, B, C, D, E, and H. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: B. Chairman Abels asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of December 11, 2001. Commissioner Tyler asked that Page 12 be amended to show that he voted No and Commissioner Robbins voted Yes. There being no further corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Tyler to approve the minutes as corrected. Unanimously approved. C. Department Report: None V. PRESENTATIONS: None. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 1 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Environmental Assessment 99-387, General Plan Amendment 99-063, Zone Change 99-091, Specific Plan 99-039, and Site Development Permit 99-659; a request of Point Happy Ranch, LLC 1.) Certification of an Environmental Impact Report as described below for the project; 2.) change of General Plan land use designation from Medium Density Residential to Office Commercial for five acres of the 43+ acre site and from Low Density Residential) to Medium Density Residential for 11.55 acres for the 62 villas; 3.) Zone Change designation from Medium Density to Office Commercial for five acres of the 43 + acre site and from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential; 4.) Specific Plan for design guidelines and development standards for senior care residential project and two commercial buildings on the 43 + acre site; 5.) review of architectural and landscaping plans for senior care units consisting of 62 one story high independent living villa units in duplex to 4-plex configurations with a two story club building, and 310 rooms for assisted living, independent living and continuing care in two 2 to 3 story high buildings, a one story high maintenance building, two commercial office buildings (two stories high) with a total of 44,000 square feet of floor area and a 9,500 square foot one story high project administration building, for the property located on the west side of Washington Street (Point Happy Ranch) . 1. No action was required and none was taken. F. Code Compliance Case 3859; a request of Christopher Kiernan for an appeal of a Public Nuisance Notice regarding a halogen light on the south side of the property line, on the hill in front of a residential structure for the property located at 46-201 Washington Street (Point Happy Ranch). 1. No action was required and none was taken. G. Environmental Assessment 2001-431, Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 232, General Plan Amendment 2001-080, Zone Change 2001-103; a request of T. D. Development for 1) Certification of an Addendum to Riverside County Environmental Assessment No. 232; 2) Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for the area bounded by Avenue 58, Monroe Street, Avenue 60 and Madison Street, outside of Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment #1; 3) Change the land use designation from: A. Medium Residential, Medium High Residential, and Golf Course, Community 2 3 J 00 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-8-02.wpd 2 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 Facilities and Commercial as shown in Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment #1 to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Major Community Facilities, Neighborhood and Community Commercial; B) From Agriculture to Low Density Residential for the area bounded by Avenue 58, Monroe Street, Avenue 60 and Madison Street, outside of Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment #1; 4) Change the zoning from: A) Riverside County designation Specific Plan as shown in Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment #1 to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Golf Course, Major Community Facilities, Neighborhood and Community Commercial; B. From Agriculture to Low Density Residential and Golf Course Bounded by Avenue 58, Monroe Street, Avenue 60 and Madison Street, outside of Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment #1, for the property bounded by Avenue 58, Monroe Street, Avenue 60, and Madison Street. Also, a portion of the area east of Monroe Street between Avenue 69 and Avenue 61. 1. Chairman Abels asked for a motion to continue to January 22, 2002. 2. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to continue the applications to January 22, 2002. Unanimously approved. I. Environmental Assessment 2001-436, General Plan Amendment 2001- 083, and Zone Change 2001-105 and Specific Plan 2001-055 - "The Gateway"; a request of the City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency for review of a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from High Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and Tourist Commercial and review of development standards and design guidelines for Tourist Commercial uses including hotels, and retail -related uses, and residential development including townhouses and single family residences for the property located at the southeast corner of Miles Avenue and Washington Street. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. 2. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to continue this application to January 22, 2002. Unanimously approved. If %r `t J e 3 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 3 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 B. Continued - Environmental Assessment 2001-415 Tentative Tract Map 29963 and Street Name Change 2001-013; a request of Dr. & Mrs. Bruce Baumann for certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact; subdivision of approximately 9.1 acres into four single family and one street lot for the property located at the terminus of Kirk Court, north of Avenue 48. 1 . Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked which school district the land was within. Staff stated it was within the CVUSD. Commissioner Tyler asked the significance of the 50-foot easement lines shown around each lot. Commissioner Robbins clarified they were building setback lines. 3. Commissioner Robbins asked that the map be amended to remove the irrigation line hooking up to a sewer line. 4. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. David Turner, Coachella Valley Engineers representing the applicant asked for clarification on Conditions #8 and #21. Kirk Court is current a public street and they intend to leave the right-of-way as it is; just the extension where it will be gated will be private. In regard to Condition #21, Security Agreements, they are building a full 28 feet on Kirk Court and will have no property adjoining Avenue 58 and they request this condition be removed. Same with Condition #22 which requires them to build full width improvements for Kirk Court and they would like it to read, "construct 28 foot width of pavement." Mr. Turner stated that in the future it will be 36 feet, they are proposing 28 feet to be built now to allow two way traffic and the rest of the improvements would be developed when the adjacent property owners develop their land. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated if this entire 20 acres were being developed they would all have to participate in the full cost of the improvements. Since only half is participating, the City is asking them to bond for their half now, so the funding is available when the street is built. With respect to Kirk Court, 235 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 4 104 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 staff is asking for two lanes of travel, or 28 feet, and the balance of the improvements will be added when the remainder parcels are developed. In regard to Condition #22 staff is asking them to either fully construct or satisfy its obligation. Staff is not asking for full street improvements, but that the condition is fully satisfied. 5. Commissioner Butler asked if it was customary to ask the applicant to bond for 50% of the improvements on a street that is adjacent to. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated yes, they have a burden for 50% of the cost. The City needs security and there are different ways of accomplishing this other than bonding, such as a lien. Mr. Turner stated they volunteered to develop the 28 feet coming into the site because they are developing 75% of the street improvements for Kirk Court. This will leave eight feet of pavement, curb and gutter to be installed. They thought the adjacent five -acre property owners on Avenue 58 should bond or develop the remainder of the street improvements. They are building 28 feet of the ultimate 36 feet for Kirk Court. This is more than their 50% share. They are building more of Kirk Court which should be a trade off. If this was allowed they would also ask that Condition #42.A. be deleted. 6. Commissioner Robbins stated he disagreed with Mr. Turner in regard to the amount of the costs as they were not doing all the curb and gutter to the next developer. Mr. Turner stated they will grade it and all they will have to do is the curb and gutter. 7. Commissioner Tyler asked what portion of the 20 acre parcel was owned by Dr. Baumann. Mr. Turner stated only the rear ten acres. Commissioner Tyler asked about the right-of-way on Kirk Court and whether or not it was a private street. Mr. Turner stated Kirk Court is a public street and indicated on the map where they were intending to construct a gate creating a private street to serve the four parcels. 8. There being no further public comment, the public participation portion of the hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 9. Commissioner Robbins stated he has no problem changing the condition to allow them only to construct the 28 feet, but agrees n with staff in regard to the bonding. 2 3 10. Commissioners Kirk, Butler, and Tyler agreed. �� L� J G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 5 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 11. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-001, recommending Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-415, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 12. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-002, recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 29963, as submitted. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 13. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-003 recommending to the City Council that a public hearing be held to consider Street Name Change 2001-013. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. C. Continued - Environmental Assessment 2001-417 and Tentative Tract Map 30092; a request of Barton Properties for certification of an Environmental Assessment and subdivision of approximately 38.4 acres into 130 single family and other common lots located at the northwest corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street. 1 . Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if this was within the City's Sphere of Influence. Community Development Director Jerry Herman clarified it was annexed into the City November 30, 2001. ., Commissioner Tyler asked about the temporary designation for the G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-8-02.wpd 6 0 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 CVWD lift station. Commissioner Robbins clarified till someone builds a sewer it will be used. Commissioner Tyler asked about Condition #2 regarding the expiration date. Staff stated it is two years from the date of the City Council approval and the condition could be removed. Commissioner Tyler asked about Condition 50 regarding the City's new standard in regard to the Kvs for power poles. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated it is only the power lines that are attached to the 92 Kv power poles that are exempt, and therefore, it would be changed to 92 Kv. Commissioner Tyler asked about the multi -use trail as it did not appear to go anywhere. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the City has envisioned a trail system that goes east and west to create a trail system leading to Lake Cahuilla which has a trail head. Commissioner Tyler questioned Condition #62 as to whether or not is was needed as it does not appear to allow sufficient stacking. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated that since these are private streets staff anticipates that a future HOA will want to gate the entrance and staff wants to ensure the street entrance is sufficiently designed to accommodate a gate. Since the map and language have been redesigned, staff would suggest the condition be deleted. Commissioner Tyler questioned Condition #89 as to whether or not it would apply to the emergency access on Monroe Street. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated as the condition is currently written there would be a pedestrian access at the emergency access. 3. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. David Hacker, Hacker Engineering representing the applicant, stated he concurred with the conditions with the exception of Condition #52.D, regarding the multi -use trail. It would be a maintenance item for the HOA. They would prefer to dedicate to the City so that when the dedication of the additional right-of-way from adjacent property owners was obtained, this could then be constructed. At this time they would prefer to landscape the area. 4. Commissioner Butler asked if they were willing to bond for it. Mr. Hacker asked what type of trail it would be. Commissioner Butler stated mostly equestrian. Mr. Hacker stated they accepted the condition as written. 5. Commissioner Robbins asked about the purpose of having a dry well on each lot, as most of them will never be maintained and why isn't the retention basin sized to handle the run off. Mr- .� G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 7 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 Hacker stated the retention basin is large enough to handle the run off, this is a backup solution only. 6. Commissioner Kirk stated it appears to be the drainage plan of first resort by the way the lots are laid out. Mr. Hacker stated the dry well is an option and will only be installed if they do not meet the drainage requirements. 7. Commissioner Robbins asked staff if this was allowed. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated the 100 year storm needs to be retained in the retention basin. The City does allow them to retain their nuisance water in privately gated communities in alternate methods. If they are for nuisance water it is up to the applicant. If storm water, the retention basin needs to retain it. Mr. Hacker stated he concurred. 8. There being no further discussion, the public participation of the hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 9. Commissioner Tyler stated his only concern was that it is just another straight line development. 10. Commissioner Butler asked if the stacking on Avenue 58 was enough. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated two car stacking is 50 feet and will be enough and went on to explain the traffic flow. 11. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-004, recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-417, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 12. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-005, recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 30092, Amendment #1, as amended. A. Delete Condition #62. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 8 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. D. Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1; a request of Warner Engineering for Lundin Development Company for an amendment to the text development standards and design guidelines and an amendment to the site plan design adjacent to Avenue 50 for a 100,500 square foot shopping center located at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if the Commission had the authority to waive the requirement for the berming. Staff stated it is a Zoning Ordinance requirement but, under a Specific Plan the development standard can be modified. Commissioner Tyler asked if the right - out at the emergency gate on the westerly driveway not being included in the Specific Plan was an oversight or a reluctance of the applicant? Staff stated they did not know, but they are conditioned to install it. 3. Commissioner Butler asked about any alternatives to the berming. Staff stated the applicant's alternative is landscaping to provide the screening along with a wall next to the fast food restaurants. Commissioner Butler asked if the berming was a safety factor for traffic on Jefferson Street or aesthetics. Staff stated it was aesthetics. 4. Commissioner Kirk asked for background on the use of setbacks for retention. Staff explained the reasons and gave examples. Commissioner Kirk asked if staff had a recommendation on the number of accesses that should be allowed on Avenue 50, beyond the emergency access. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated staff has been scaling the distances between the driveways and it came to 109 feet which is rather short. As a result, staff added Condition #38.E. eliminating the one access on the west end of the site on Avenue 50. 5. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 9 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 Commission. Mr. Mike Smith, Warner Engineering representing the applicant, asked that Condition #48 be amended to delete the first two words and add "...shall be landscaped." Mr. Ray Lopez, Landscape Architect for the project, gave a presentation on the landscaping. 6. Commissioner Kirk asked if the applicant had been having any problems with the Palo Verde trees being pruned incorrectly because storefronts were being obscured by the landscaping in other centers. Mr. Lopez stated he had not seen any disappear but the problems have been with maintenance people not knowing how to prune the trees. It becomes a code enforcement issue. 7. Commissioner Tyler stated the trees can be butchered to the point of nonexistence. Mr. Lopez stated this is a problem. Commissioner Tyler stated there was a statement in the Specific Plan that the trees would reach maturity within 20-30 years and the plans show within five to six year. Mr. Lopez stated when mature, the Acacia species will be 25-feet and depending upon maintenance, fertilization, and watering they can reach that height in ten years. 8. Commissioner Robbins stated the retention basin at the southeast corner near Jefferson the retention basin comes right up to the base of the sidewalk, then the sidewalk, and then out toward Jefferson Street there is a wide band of grass, is there any reason the sidewalk needs to be so close to the slope. It seems it could be moved closer to the street. Mr. Lopez stated that would not be a problem. In that area, there is a slight berm. It could be meandered and berm Commissioner Robbins asked staff if that would resolve the issue. Staff stated they would need to see the plans first. Mr. Lopez stated they could get 1-4 feet in height in that section along Jefferson Street and meander the walkway. 9. Mr. Herb Lundin, owner of the project, stated that in regard to the fifth driveway it is to serve the customers for the end shops and staff determined the driveways to be safe. With regard to the distance it is a safe distance, there is stacking and will be a lightly used driveway, and will be a right turn -in and out. It is also consistent with the General Plan. 10. Commissioner Butler asked the location for the gas station and A whether or not additional accesses would be needed. Mr. Smith G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 10 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 stated it would be located on Pad E and they were not requesting any additional accesses to service the gas station. 1 1 . Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment. There being no further public comment, the public participation portion of the hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 12. Commissioner Robbins stated he has no objection to the retention basin in the setback area. He would suggest the sidewalk on Jefferson Street be moved, meandered and as much berming as possible. He does not have any real concerns in regard to the driveway. 13. Commissioner Kirk stated he has no issue with the berming in the setback area, but has a concern with the process and fairness. If it is a City Code to have consistency in regard to Major Arterials in regard to aesthetics, then the Zoning Code should be changed to reflect this. He has a strong objection to using a specific plan to get rid portions of the Zoning Code that are problematic. This is a good project using the specific plan process to alleviate itself of an annoying requirement in the Zoning Code and for that portion he is not supportive of the request. In regard to accesses, he believes they should limit the number, and only allow two accesses on Avenue 50 with an emergency access. 14. Commissioner Butler stated he concurs with most of his statements, but also believes the applicant has addressed the issues raised by the Commission. He does not have any concern regarding the number accesses and would support their request for the third access, especially since the gas station would not be requesting any accesses. 15. Commissioner Tyler stated he agrees with most of the issues as they have been addressed. As to the third driveway, if it is eliminated it will increase traffic on the other accesses causing a greater circulation problem. 16. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-006 approving Specific Plan 98-034 Amendment #1, as amended. 2 4 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 11 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 A. Condition #38.E.: Secondary Entry into Parcel 2 Parking area (Avenue 50, 810-foot W. of C/L Intersection with Jefferson Street): Right turn in, Right turn out. B. Condition #48: Storm water will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The meandering public sidewalk adjacent to Pad "C" shall be moved closer to the street in order to allow up to three feet of berming, east of the adjacent retention basin. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: Commissioner Kirk. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Chairman Abels recessed the meeting at 8:29 p.m. and reconvened at 8:35 p.m. E. Environmental Assessment 2001-437, General Plan Amendment 2001- 081, Zone Change 2001-104, Specific Plan 90-016 Amendment #1 and Tentative Tract Map 30357; a request of the Toll Brothers, Inc. for approval of an Environmental Assessment; a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to change 14 acres at the northeastern corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 52 from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial; a Specific Plan Amendment modifying standards and guidelines for the construction of 490 single family residence, 60 fractional ownership units, an 18 hole golf course and a 14 acre neighborhood shopping center; and a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide portions of the project area into 178 residential lots, lots for future residential subdivision, casitas development, golf course, maintenance and clubhouse facility lots, and other lettered lots for streets and other facilities. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste, presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if additional buffering should be considered between this project and the equestrian uses on the northern portion of this project. 3. Commissioner Kirk asked at what point was this area to be zoned Neighborhood Commercial. Staff stated that when the land use r G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 12 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 analysis was made for the General Plan, it was designated at that time. Commissioner Kirk asked why the golf course was not being required to use canal water. Staff stated it was conditioned to use canal water. The Specific Plan had not been edited to meet the conditions. Commissioner Kirk asked if living fences were being allowed in specific plans. Staff stated yes. 4. Commissioner Robbins stated the canal should be referenced as the Coachella Valley Canal in the Specific Plan. 5. Commissioner Tyler questioned the number of accesses in the Specific Plan in proximity to the round -about at Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street. Staff noted they were right in, right out accesses only. Commissioner Tyler pointed out some inconsistencies in the Specific Plan. 6. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Forrest Haag, representing Toll Bros., gave a presentation on the project. He stated his concern regarding Condition #8, and asked that it be amended to add, "with the exception of flag logs, irregular cul-de-sac lots, and lots fronting on curve streets." Condition #13, they agree with staff's recommendation and ask that it be amended to add, "the improvements to those areas shall be adjacent to residential or commercial development as they take place." On Condition #19, they would like to request clarification on the lateral location. Condition #20 add, "....use as a primary source....". Condition #26, delete any reference to the tunnel. Condition #44.E., they are requesting to use a "100 scale plan" and last paragraph changed to read, "to allow perimeter walls not to be required on rough grading plan mandatorily." Condition #57, rather than keeping the pads within one foot, leave them where they are in natural grade and create slope banks on their property to deal with the impacts as well as the perimeter walls. Condition #71, they are requesting to use 20 scale plans. 7. Commissioner Robbins asked if the applicant would object to having a condition that the golf course conform to City's Landscape Ordinance as far as water usage. Mr. Haag stated yes; it would be the first in the Valley. This is a flat -land golf course which makes it more difficult. Discussion followed regarding different golf courses. 24 8. Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment. Mr. Robert Cunnard, 80-225 Avenue 50, stated he was the landowner G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 13 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 adjacent to the project on the west side. His concern was the existing 20-foot easement that runs the length of his property; what happens to this easement? Which side will the wall be on? Also, what will happen to the water standpipe that services his property? Will Avenue 50 be widened only in front of this site or will the entire length be widened? How will the dust be controlled during the grading? Mr. Forest Haag stated the easement is owned by Toll Bros and will probably go away. Mr. Cunnard stated it also serves the back part of his property. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the easement was part of the Kanlian property and is now part of the Toll Bros property and will go away with the development of the site. 9. Mr. Wells Marvin, 79-258 Cetrino, owns lot two at the Polo Estates, stated his concern was with the height of the houses to be constructed as it is not clear in the Specific Plan. He would like a limit of 20 feet. The Polo Estates houses cannot build above 18- feet. Also, the height of living fence. If it is placed at the level of the top of the canal it will block their view. If that fence is put at the bottom of the slope it will have no additional impact. He is also concerned about the vacant pads and suggested they be sodded and kept green or landscaped in some way to control the dust. Another concern is that there will be no maintenance facility built within a reasonable period of time. The street improvements need to be done on a time frame that is within 1-3 years of construction. Finally, there should be at least a golf cart entrance to the Neighborhood Commercial site. 10. Mr. Jack Kalvin, La Quinta Polo Estates, asked for a definition of a living fence. He would like to note he is opposed to a living fence and if it should be built, it should be below the canal height to not obscure their view. There needs to be a control on any berming heights. Is it possible for the Homeowners' Association to receive more defined plans. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the plans are always available at City Hall for review. Mr. Kalvin asked if the houses would be constructed at the height of the canal height. Staff stated there are no house plans to review at this time. Another public hearing would be held when the tract is mapped and building elevations were available. 11. Mr. Dan Hammonds, 50-325 Vista Montana, La Quinta Polo Estates, stated he was concerned with the house heights adjacent �- to his property. 14 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-8-02.wpd 14 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 12. Mr. Jay Baden, 47-415 Via Cordova, stated he purchased property at Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street and is glad to have the golf course, but believes there is enough commercial at this location without allowing the rezoning of this site. 13. Mr. Wells Marvin stated the grading is before the Commission at this time. There is an existing grade now and if they are allowed to raise that grade it can obstruct their view. It should not be allowed to go higher than one foot. 14. Mr. Chris Bergh, MDS Consulting, engineers for the project, stated that where they are adjacent to La Quinta Polo Estates they are within one foot of the existing pad elevation for the adjacent lots. The grades for future development are shown on the tentative map. If they are to maintain retention requirements they will need more than one foot. The existing ground along their entire eastern border varies by only one foot. To get proper drainage on streets you cannot stay within one foot for the entire easterly boundary. They are staying within a couple feet and that is what they are proposing. In regard to the irrigation lateral, this line will be relocated and will continue to supply the irrigation water to the existing lots as it does now. 15. Commissioner Kirk asked that the grade elevations on the eastern boundary be explained. Mr. Bergh stated the pads are about 26- feet. Discussion followed regarding elevations and heights of the houses. Mr. Haag stated the building heights are limited to 28- feet. 16. Commissioner Kirk asked about a maintenance facility. Mr. Haag noted it is located on Lot 90. It will be built in conjunction with the golf course development. 17. There being no further public comment, the public participation portion of the public hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 18. Commissioner Tyler stated he too was not in favor of a living fence and suggested there be an eight foot wall height on the northern property line for a buffer from the equestrian uses. Once the site is graded, there should be some sort of permanent dust 0 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 15 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 control provided. 19. Commissioner Kirk stated that in regard to the grade differential, he would suggest the eastern boundary be conditioned to keep the grade within two feet of the native grade. With respect to the living fence, he asked if it is a fence with a vine, or a hedge. Mr. Haag stated it would be a six foot chain length fence with a plant that would grow on it. The proposed fence would be at the bottom of the grade. Commissioner Kirk stated he had concerns about sodding the lots due to the water usage, but there should be a soil stabilizer. Also, what is staff's recommendation in regard to timing the development. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated it will be bonded for all the off -site improvements with the first phase of the map. The City does not release the bonds until the first phase map is completed. The City does allow that to be extended for a period of time if needed. 20. Commissioner Robbins stated he agreed that there needs to be dust control measures and the project is conditioned to do so. The berm is another issue. In some places where there will be a wall it will be six feet higher than the top of the existing road and it is unavoidable. In regard to the water, he believes there is a way to have a grass golf course that can meet the Landscape Ordinance. Discussion followed regarding the Landscape Ordinance in relation to a golf course. 21. Commissioner Tyler asked if the Commission should not consider lowering the height of the houses from 28-feet. Consultant Planner Nicole Criste suggested the houses along the eastern boundary be limited to 18 feet. 22. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-007 recommending adoption of Environmental Assessment 2001-437. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 23. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-008 recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 2001-081, as submitted. 24i G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 16 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 24. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-009 recommending approval of Zone Change 2001-104, as submitted. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 25. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-009 recommending approval of Specific Plan 90-016, Amendment #1, as amended. A. Condition #4: "All references to the landscape buffer at the northern boundary of the commercial shopping center site shall be changed to 50 feet if adjacent to residential." B. Condition #8: add, "...except flag lots, irregular cul-de-sacs, and curvilinear streets." C. Condition #12: "Item C., page 3.15 shall be amended to reflect 6 foot walls in all residential areas, and 8 foot walls for commercial areas and for the property line adjacent to the lots on Avenue 50." D. Condition #13: "The landscaping plan shall include all frontages on City streets, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to completion of precise grading plan on any portion of the site, and shall include phasing plan for installation of perimeter landscaping." E. Condition #14: "The landscaping plan shall include all frontages on City streets, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to completion of precise grading plan on any portion of the site, and shall include phasing plan for installation of perimeter landscaping." F. Condition #16: "The Specific Plan Site Plan shall include a pedestrian, golf cart, and bicycle access between the residential/golf portion of the site, and the neighborhood commercial portion of the site." G. Condition #18: "The golf course landscaping shall conform to the City's water conserving landscape ordinance. Prior to G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-8-02.wpd 17 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 City Council hearing, the applicant shall prepare the calculations to determine whether the golf course design conforms to the City's water conserving landscaping ordinance. Should the calculations show that the golf course cannot conform to this standard, the City Council shall consider eliminating this condition." H. Condition #24: Water from the Coachella Canal shall be used as the primary source for irrigation of golf course and greenbelts within the project area. I. Condition #27: Change to CVUSD J. Condition #30: "The applicant shall block off the existing golf cart tunnel crossing under Jefferson Street in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer." K. Condition #48.E.: "100 scale". L. Condition #62: "The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. The overall site grading adjacent to the Canal shall not exceed two feet from natural grading, and shall not exceed more than one foot over the entire length of the site." M. Condition #74.A.(c): Traffic signal at the projects main entry on Avenue 50 when warrants are met. Applicant is responsible for 50 % of the cost to design and install the traffic signal if complementing cost share from development on other side of street is available at time signal is required. Applicant shall enter into a SIA to post security for 50 % of the cost to design and install the traffic signal prior to issuance of an on -site grading permit; the security shall remain in full force and effect until the signal is actually installed by the applicant or the developer on the other side of the street. If the land on the other side of the street does not have an approved project connecting to the subject intersection, the applicant shall pay 100% of the cost to design and install the signalization for the resulting "T" intersection. If, however, the applicant's development trails the progress of the development on the other side of the street, the applicant shall be responsible for 50% of the cost as previously stated. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-8-02.wpd 18 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 26. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-010 recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 30357, as amended. A. Condition #3: Change to CVUSD B. Condition #6: Change to read, "The applicant shall block off the existing golf cart tunnel crossing under Jefferson Street in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer." C. Condition #24.E.: Change to 100 feet. D. Condition #38: "The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. The overall site grading adjacent to the Canal shall not exceed two feet from natural grading, and shall not exceed more than one foot over the entire length of the site." E. Condition #50.A.(c): Traffic signal at the projects main entry on Avenue 50 when warrants are met. Applicant is responsible for 50 % of the cost to design and install the traffic signal if complementing cost share from development on other side of street is available at time signal is required. Applicant shall enter into a SIA to post security for 50 % of the cost to design and install the traffic signal prior to is.tuance of an on -site grading permit; the security shall remain in full force and effect until the signal is actually installed by the applicant or the developer on the other side of the street. If the land on the other side of the street does not have an approved project connecting to the subject intersection, the applicant shall pay 100% of the cost to design and install the signalization for the resulting "T" intersection. If, however, the applicant's development trails the progress of the development on the other side of the street, the applicant shall be responsible for 50% of the cost as previously stated. F. Add Condition #90: "Any residential lot occurring within 300-feet of existing equestrian or agricultural land uses at the time of subdivision of that lot, shall be deed restricted to require notification by the seller to the purchaser of the lot that the lot is located within 300-feet of an existing equestrian or agricultural land use." G. Add Condition #91: "The landscaping plan shall include all2540 frontages on City streets, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to completion ot, 19 precise grading plan on any portion of the site, and shall G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-8-02.wpd 19 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 include phasing plan for installation of perimeter landscaping." ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. H. Site Development Permit 2001-722; a request of Wayne Price, Price's Nursery and Supply, Inc. for review of development plans for a 3,600 square foot equipment storage building and convert a mobile home residence into an office for the property located at 80-420 Avenue 52. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Robbins asked about the Fire Department conditions to provide fire flow that are being required and there is no domestic water to the site. How is the applicant going to comply with these conditions. 3. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Chuck McBride, architect for the project, stated the water line proposed for Avenue 52 is on hold. The Fire Marshal was asked how they could achieve this if there was no water line on Avenue 52 as it would be cost prohibitive for the applicant to supply it. The alternate was suggested that a temporary supply could be taken from the canal, set up a pump and when the water was available on Avenue 52 they would then connect. This they could meet under a temporary condition. 4. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public hearing and opened the meeting to Commission discussion. 5. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-012 approving Site Development Permit 2002-012, as corrected. A. Conditions # 10, # 12, # 13 and #22: Delete G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 20 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 B. Condition #14.A. Delete everything after "...ADA requirements". C. Condition #24.A.: Revise to read, "Primary Entry (Avenue 52: Left and Right turn in, Right turn out." D. Condition #24.B.: Revise to read, "Secondary Entry (Avenue 52 at Wst P/Q: Right turn in, Right turn out." E. Condition #36 & #37 combined and add, "...or other means acceptable to the Fire Department pursuant to any approvals necessary from CVWD." F. Condition #38: Delete. G. Conditions #39, #42 & #43: Deleted. VII. BUSINESS ITEMS: None. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. IX. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: H. Commissioner Tyler gave a report on the City Council meeting of January 3, 2002. X. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Robbins to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held January 8, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 10:53 p.m. on January 8, 2002. Respectfully submitted, t awyer, E e�d"cutive Secretary City of La Quinta, California 2 51- G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-8-02.wpd 21 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA January 22, 2002 I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:04 p.m. by Chairman Abels who asked Commissioner Butler to lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Richard Butler, Tom Kirk, Steve Robbins, Robert Tyler, and Chairman Jacques Abels. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez, Planning Manager Christine di lorio, Senior Engineer Steve Speer, Planning Consultant Nicole Criste, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: A. Chairman Abels welcomed Boy Scout Troop #848 who were in attendance as part of their "Citizens in the Community" badge. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: B. Chairman Abels asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of January 8, 2002. Commissioner Tyler asked that Pages 17 and 19 be amended to reflect the Resolutions were approved, "as amended". There being no further corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to approve the minutes as corrected. Unanimously approved. C. Department Report: None V. PRESENTATIONS: None. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-22-02.w d 1 10 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 A. Environmental Assessment 2001-431 , Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 232, General Plan Amendment 2001-080, Zone Change 2001-103; a request of T. D. Development for 1) Certification of an Addendum to Riverside County Environmental Assessment No. 232; 2) Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for the area bounded by Avenue 58, Monroe Street, Avenue 60 and Madison Street, outside of Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment #1; 3) Change the land use designation from: A. Medium Residential, Medium High Residential, and Golf Course, Community Facilities and Commercial as shown in Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment #1 to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Major Community Facilities, Neighborhood and Community Commercial; B) From Agriculture to Low Density Residential for the area bounded by Avenue 58, Monroe Street, Avenue 60 and Madison Street, outside of Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment #1; 4) Change the zoning from: A) Riverside County designation Specific Plan as shown in Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment #1 to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Golf Course, Major Community Facilities, Neighborhood and Community Commercial; B. From Agriculture to Low Density Residential and Golf Course Bounded by Avenue 58, Monroe Street, Avenue 60 and Madison Street, outside of Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment #1, for the property bounded by Avenue 58, Monroe Street, Avenue 60, and Madison Street. Also, a portion of the area east of Monroe Street between Avenue 69 and Avenue 61. 1 . Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner'Kirk asked staff where the figure referred to in Addendum Item II.c) came from. Staff stated the figure was provided by Riverside County for the Eastern Coachella Valley. Commissioner Robbins stated that figure would have to apply to the entire Riverside County. Staff would research the figure and correct the figure if necessary. 3. Commissioner Tyler asked if there was a Williamson Act contract in this area. Staff noted where one existed within the area. 5 `r ` 4. Commissioner Robbins asked how a zone change in and of itself . 0!'2 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-22-02.wpd 2 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 can have any environmental impact. Staff stated the zone change does not, but the buildout of the project under the zoning designation does and that is what is evaluated in the Environmental Assessment. Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez stated it is a discretionary project and the Environmental Assessment looks at the uses that will result from the zone change. 5. Commissioner Kirk stated the Zone Change does not increase the intensity it is a conversion of the County designations to City designation. Staff stated not within the lands outside the Specific Plan area. There is an intensification of land use there, as they are currently agricultural. 6. Commissioner Tyler asked why the City was not be listed as one of the applicants. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated it should be and it would be corrected before going to the City Council. 7. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. John Gamlin, representing the applicant, gave a presentation on the project and stated they had no objections to the conditions as written. 8. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of the applicant. There being none, Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment on this item. 9. There being no further public participation, the public comment portion of the public hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 10. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-013, recommending Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-431, subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. ea. 2 + 11. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Tyler to G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-22-02.wpd 3 0 3 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-014, recommending Certification of an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #232, subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 12. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-015, recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 2001-080, subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 13. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-016, recommending approval of Zone Change 2001-103, subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. B. Environmental Assessment 2001-436, General Plan Amendment 2001- 083, and Zone Change 2001-105 and Specific Plan 2001-055 - "The Gateway"; a request of the City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency for review of a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from High Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and Tourist Commercial and review of development standards and design guidelines for Tourist Commercial uses including hotels, and retail -related uses, and residential development including townhouses and single family residences for the property located at the southeast corner of Miles Avenue and Washington Street. 1 . Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Mr. Frank Spevacek, Rosenow Spevacek Group, Redevelopment Consultant for the City, presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. 5.� 0 �.` 4 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-22-02.wpd 4 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 Commissioner Kirk stated that given the original purpose and land use of the site, what is the impact of the City's ability to meet the regional fair share of housing needs. Staff stated it will both reduce the City's ability to meet the need in terms of the fair share housing for the City's General Plan as well as the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) inclusionary housing requirements. However, staff found that as noise impacts that would be generated by the Washington Street and Miles Avenue roadway activities was studies, to put residential units at this location would provide more impacts to residence than it would to occupants of hotel/commercial uses. From an environmental compatibility standpoint, it makes more sense to have commercial abut those areas. In addition, the RDA will be looking at revising its housing strategies to perhaps include purchasing additional properties to meet both the City's affordable housing needs as well as the Agency. Commissioner Kirk asked if the City and Agency were close to meeting its inclusionary housing requirements. In terms of the Agency's requirements, we are one-third of the way there. 3. Commissioner Kirk asked if there was a copy of the visual simulation available as referred to in the Environmental Assessment. Also, on Page 13 of the Specific Plan there is an Energy Efficiency Plan requirement; is this the first time the City has done this and if so, who will monitor this? Planning Manager Christine di lorio stated the City is trying to see what a potential developer could provide in order to encourage these measures. The Planning Commission will review the site development permit for energy provisions. Commissioner Kirk asked if there were other guidelines than those contained in the Zoning Code. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated that depending on how this project develops, staff could create the guidelines and require them of the developers in the future. Staff will try to obtain whatever they can for a model in order to establish these types of guidelines. The Specific Plan is not specific in order to allow the developer the opportunity to inform staff of what is possible. Commissioner Kirk asked if the requirements should be in place before hiring a developer. Staff stated the City wanted as much latitude as possible to help create the standards. Discussion followed. 4. Commissioner Tyler stated he was concerned that some of the City's established standards were being reduced to accommodate r� J this Specific Plan, such as building setbacks. The minimum livable floor area is being reduced to 1,200 square feet. The casitas units, G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-22-02.wpd 5 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 location should be specified. He also has several concerns about the off -site improvements that are mentioned in the Environmental Assessment. He asked why the City is asking the developer to install a signal at Seeley Drive and Miles Avenue. It should be required to be at the first phase of development or when it meets warrants; it should be defined better. He suggested adding a left turn pocket to Seeley Drive where it enters Miles Avenue from the Acacia development. 5. Commissioner Butler questioned why staff was lowering the square footage for the houses to less than the City's requirement of 1,400 square feet. He, too, is concerned with the reduction in setbacks. Planning Manager Christine di lorio stated that by allowing the reduction in setbacks on the corners, it will allow the building to be pushed up to the corner instead of having a parking lot. Staff gave examples. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated that as it relates to unit sizes, there are two sizes. This project is envisioned to have affordable units and market units. Staff is wanting to give flexibility to the design. These are minimum sizes, the site development permit will provide more when it is reviewed in the future. Commissioner Butler asked if there was a limit to the number of smaller houses that could be constructed at this time. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated there are only 90 units to be built in this site. Staff is requesting the flexibility to give a potential developer options at this time. The intent is to have a variety of housing units sizes. 6. Commissioner Kirk asked if staff had a percentage of affordable units they were proposing to develop. City Consultant Frank Spevacek stated that at this time, it is the Agency's goal to have a minimum of 15% to 20% affordable units. It becomes a matter of economics as to how much the Agency elects to subsidize the units in order to reach the affordable level. At this point in terms of housing production goals, it is looking to be 15% to 20%. When the City tried to make the Miraflores 100% affordable at moderate rates, we ran into market condition problems, therefore, we went to 50% affordable and 50% market rate. Commissioner Kirk asked if staff needed to reduce building area in order to have the affordable units. Mr. Spevacek stated that not so much in reducing the building area, but what they found out with the Miraflores project was that the 1,200 to 1,300 square foot units were the most popular. What staff is trying to accomplish is to 2 5 raise the development standards by allowing the flexibility of the development by permitting the 1,200 square foot units as well as � `>, G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-22-02.wpd 6 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 the larger units and broker with the developer the unit mix. Commissioner Kirk asked about the 1,000 square foot attached units. Mr. Spevacek stated the object was to have a townhome type project with two stories, two bedrooms to buffer the residential from Miles Avenue and commercial development. 7. Commissioner Kirk asked if the reduction in size was to meet the affordable standards. Staff stated that what the City found out in the Miraflores project was that the market was for the 1,200 square foot house. Staff want to have the flexibility to broker the size with the developer. Commissioner Kirk asked about the attached units. Staff indicated that a townhome type project is proposed that would buffer the single family from both Miles Avenue and the commercial development. Commissioner Kirk asked what staff position has been with potential developers in regard to reducing the livable floor area. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the project at Jefferson Street and Fred Waring Drive has the smaller units approved on 5000 square feet lots. However, the developer will be changing the size, but at the time pf the approval they wanted flexibility. 8. Commissioner Robbins asked why the Specific Plan does not contain the objectives as explained by staff. Why is it not a part of the document. Staff stated it is a City Redevelopment Agency project and it depends on what the Agency wants to do in regard to assistance. Commissioner Robbins ask why, on a piece of property next to the Storm Channel, is the City tying up several acres of land in retention basin when the channel can be used. Staff stated it is temporary in nature. Commissioner Robbins stated it is shown on the plan as retention basin. Planning Manager Christine di lorio stated it is a phased program where the hotel is constructed and the retention is in the residential area and when the residential is built it is removed. Mr. Doug Franklin, Keith Companies, engineer for the project, stated the park is one foot deep and permanent and the other is temporary. Staff stated that on Page 15, Section 3.3.1 it speaks to temporary measures and temporarily directing surface runoff and explains what is to be done permanently. 9. Commissioner Kirk asked what the advantage was to having it temporary with the storm channel is so close. Mr. Franklin stated rr Iv f G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-22-02.wpd 7 �;! Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 it is to accommodate the runoff on a temporary basis and then divert to the Channel. The park is part of the permanent system. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the intention is to build the commercial portion first and then the residential and connect to the Channel at that time. 10. Commissioner Tyler stated he had a concern on Page 8 of the Specific Plan where it stated "within the site Seeley Drive will be lined by entrances to the residential component." Mr. Frank Spevacek explained that Exhibit "B" of the Specific Plan is just an illustrative site plan for design to identify how much building mass the site can be accommodated given the development standards. He went on to explain the openings and the objective for the area. 11. Commissioner Butler asked if Seeley Drive would come from Miles Avenue, go through the project and exit onto Washington Street. Staff stated it would. 12. Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment on this item. Ms. Margaret Taylor, 78-615 Alden Circle stated her concern was in regard to the traffic onto Seeley Drive. Her home faces onto Seeley Drive and kids are always playing on the street. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated Seeley Drive is intended to have a signal and will be a controlled access. Washington Street will be a right in and right out and maybe a left in. It is not intended to be a fast moving thoroughfare. It will have a traffic circle to slow the traffic down. Ms. Taylor asked if there would be some direction given to keep the tourists from driving down this street. Staff stated they are trying to mitigate it and achieve the least amount of traffic. 13. Ms. Helga Paul, 45-395 Coldbrook Lane, stated she was concerned as this development is right next to her house. She asked if Seeley Drive would be the only street into this development from Miles Avenue. Staff stated yes. There may be an opportunity to have a right in and right out between Seeley Drive and Washington Street into the hotel. Ms. Paul stated she was also concerned with the height of the project. Staff noted that with the grading of the property there will be a one foot differential between the City's project and the single family homes. 14. There being no further public participation, the public comment 2 portion of the public hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-22-02.wpd 8 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 15. Commissioner Tyler stated he has mixed feelings in regard to Exhibit "B". He would like to see a southbound lane on Seeley Drive. 16. Commissioner Kirk stated this is a nonspecific specific plan that allows as much flexibility as possible at this time. He applauded staff on the energy efficiency plans, but was still concerned with the setbacks and questioned why the City should give itself a greater break than it would give a developer. He would not want every unit to have the ability to be 1,200 square feet; maybe 20% 17. Commissioner Robbins stated there are no parking spaces at the park and there should be some off street parking for the use. He agrees with Commissioner Kirk that there should be a limit placed on the number of smaller units. He also agrees with reducing the setbacks for the corners, but there also needs to be some limit in the middle of the block where the changes do not apply. There should be a limit of 100 feet from an intersection as a suggestion. He was also concerned with Seeley Drive becoming a through street. There does not need to be a full turn at Miles Avenue and Seeley Drive. Right in and out and a left turn in off of Miles Avenue would be sufficient. The problem is to get a left turn onto Washington Street. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the possibility of getting a full turning movement on Washington Street is slim due to the angle and visibility. The reason for the full movement on Miles Avenue is for the hotel as a full turn movement will not be allowed on Washington Street. Discussion followed. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated full turn movements are a premium. The one at Seeley Drive has a full turn and will match up. The concern is the cut -through traffic of northbound traffic leaving this site and going across Miles Avenue and then through the neighborhood. If this becomes a real problem, there are things the City can do to control this. The occasional tourists who travel through the neighborhood can be a concern and could be handled at a later time. 18. Commissioner Kirk asked about the buildings in the setback area. City Consultant Frank Spevacek stated there are two factors. First, the City has a requirement that there can be no building higher than 22 feet within 150 feet of an Arterial street. This would limit the building height to one story. Second, looking at the potential noise impacts and building limits, there will need to P P 9 be a combination of berming and setbacks. Third, the entry pt- ` G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-22-02.wpd 9 ! Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 Miles Avenue and Washington Street is difficult to get into and have good circulation from a physical standpoint and to make it a major entry statement to the City. To make this happen when you deal with the setback, height limits, and circulation to get to this point and add the entry points, staff came up with this design as it would accommodate with the setback and allowed for rational circulation to that point, and facilitated the landscape feature at this intersection. In regard to parking, there will be a landscaped berm to buffer along the streets; an adequate setback of a potential three story building from Miles Avenue; and the potential single family next door. The thought was instead of loading the parking off Seeley Drive and moving the building back to Miles Avenue, the parking was placed between the berm that would hide it and the hotel structure. 19. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-017, recommending Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-436, subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 20. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-018, recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 2001-083, subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 21. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-019, recommending approval of Zone Change 2001-105, subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. , . G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-22-02.wpd 10 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 9. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-020, recommending approval of Specific Plan 2001-055, subject to the findings as submitted/amended: Condition #1: Page 5. Land Use Area I. Tourist Commercial Development Standards. Add a Minimum 30 foot building setback from Miles Avenue and Washington Street. Condition #2: Page 6. Land Use Area II. Detached Dwelling Units. The development standards shall be changed in that the minimum livable floor area for single family detached excluding the garage shall be 1,400 square feet with 15% at 1,200 square feet. Condition #3: Page 7. Land Use Area II. Attached Dwelling Units/Resort Casitas. The minimum livable floor area shall be 1,400 square feet with 30% allowed to be under 1,400 square feet. Condition #4: Page 7. Land Use Area III. B. Permitted Uses. Add a #5. Parking Lot. Condition #5: Page 14. Off -Site Improvements. The Public Works Department shall consider the option to install a left turn pocket for Seeley Drive southbound. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. C. Site Development Permit 2001-724; a request of Family YMCA of the Desert for review of architectural plans for a 2,626 square foot addition to the YMCA La Quinta Preschool, located at 49-955 Park Avenue. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner asked if the trees would be replanted. Staff stated the architect could answer that question. 6 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-22-02.wpd 11 �+ Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 3. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. John Walling, representing the applicant, gave a presentation on the project. He stated that in regard to the trees, it depends on whether or not they could be moved and saved. 4. Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment. There being no further public comment, the public participation portion of the hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-021, approving Site Development Permit 2001- 727, subject to the findings and conditions as submitted. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Chairman Abels recessed the meeting at 8:20 p.m. and reconvened at 8:26 p.m. D. Site Development Permit 2001-725; a request of Carlos Gomez for Von's Shopping Center for review of development plans to increase the size of the Von's Supermarket from 36,827 square feet to 47,198 square feet for the property located at 78-271 through 78-297 Highway 1 1 1, within Plaza La Quinta. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Robbins stated the old plan shows a wooden trellis shade structure and it now appears to be a solid archway that is shorter. Staff stated it is a reduced arcade structure. 3. Commissioner Tyler asked the purpose of the flat arcade. Staff stated there is no purpose, it was a design element. 4. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the ; Commission. Mr. Carlos Gomez, representing the applicant, stated v G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-22-02.wpd 12 �� Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 he was available to answer any questions. 5. Commissioner Robbins asked if the roofline was extended. Mr. Gomez stated that as a result of the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee's recommendation they balanced the structure to be more symetrical with the in -line units. 6. Commissioner Tyler asked if the entrances would be the same. Mr. Gomez stated they would be moved only five or ten feet. Commissioner Tyler asked if the building would move any further out into the parking lot area. Mr. Gomez stated no. 7. Commissioner Robbins asked if the blowers over the entrance doors would be made more attractive to not appear to be add-ons. Mr. Gomez stated they are designed according to health standards. Commissioner Robbins stated his objection is to the aesthetics and whether or not they could not be treated aesthetically. Mr. Gomez stated they would see if there were any other designs available. 8. Commissioner Kirk asked about the parking analysis. Mr. Gomez stated they based their parking plan -on the aerial photograph that had been taken. Commissioner Kirk stated if they are showing 147,000 square feet of tenant space and if the parking requirement is one parking space for every 250 feet, he comes up with 588 parking spaces. Mr. Gomez stated each particular tenant is allocated a number of parking spaces, and they are within at least one stall of meeting the requirements. Discussion followed as to how they were calculated. 9. Commissioner Butler asked staff what they were asking of the applicant in regard to employees parking in the rear. Staff explained they were trying to make sure all parking was utilized. Additional lighting and patrol was needed to ensure the employees would use this area for parking. However, Vons does not have a rear entrance for accessibility and staff has made this a condition of approval (#8. D) . 10. Commissioner Tyler asked if they are going to enclose the arcade and will the carts be moved inside. Mr. Gomez stated yes. Commissioner Tyler asked for clarification on the pavilion. Mr. Gomez stated this area was the Manager's office. Commissioner Tyler asked if a bank was proposed to be located inside. Mr. Gomez stated none at this time. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-22-02.wpd 13 ��13 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 11. Chairman Abels asked if the entrance could be a double vestibule for energy conservation. Mr. Gomez stated two vestibules are proposed. Also in regard to proposed Condition #8.D., they are willing to provide employee accessibility, but believe a rear door access is a security problem. Could this be done through the side driveway aisle? They will provide extensive lighting and security to encourage employee parking. Mr. Thomas Acevedo, Director of Real Estate for Vons, stated there are security issues to be considered in regard to internal theft and nighttime security, such as packages leaving, bodily injury, etc. They can accommodate stripped access and lighting to direct employees to the parking in the rear. The nighttime employees would be given the ability to park out front due to the decreased amount of usage of the store. 12. Commissioner Kirk asked about the bus stop on Washington Street. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the bus stop on Washington Street will be moved across the street in front of the Point Happy development. The bus stop on Highway 1 1 1 will be upgraded to meet the City 's new standards. 13. Commissioner Tyler asked if the mezzanine as shown on the plans, will be kept? Mr. Gomez stated yes. 14. Commissioner Kirk asked why Von's security is any different that the other in -line stores. Mr. Acevedo stated the issues of the products being removed is primary as there is no one in the rear of the store on a constant basis and second the bodily harm as there is no way to secure the area. 15. Commissioner Kirk asked if staff did a parking analysis. Planning Manager Christine di lorio stated yes and they came up with 614 spaces which meets the requirement. Commissioner Kirk asked if staff was concerned if they did not use the parking in the rear. Staff stated yes, as they would not meet the requirements. To limit them to day use in the rear and nighttime in front would be sufficient. Mr. Keith Charles, Architect for the project, stated there is 147,618 square feet of building area and 575 parking stalls are required. With the proposed building area they are showing it at 3.8 per thousand; 4 per thousand would be 590 stalls. They are providing 589, so they are within one stall. , ,, Discussion followed regarding parking and security issues with a' rear entrance. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-22-02.wpd 14 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 16. Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment. There being no further discussion, the public participation of the hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 17. Commissioner Kirk asked if there was any way for the City to enforce the employee parking plan. Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez stated he was not sure. This is different from the prototypical situation where you would involve Code Compliance, and he would be skeptical of it being a viable tool. Planning Manager Christine di lorio there could be a stipulation put on Vons to meet the requirement and require them to submit the plan to staff prior to issuance of building permit. Discussion followed as to possible alternatives regarding the parking plan. 18. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-022, approving Site Development Permit 2001- 725, subject to the findings and conditions as amended: A. Condition #8.D: Amend to read, "The Plaza La Quinta Employee Parking Plan shall be modified to include an enforcement program for the employee parking area south of the Vons building. This enforcement plan shall include a provision that the spaces shall be used, in the daylight hours, from October 1 through May 31. The enforcement plan shall be submitted and approved by the Community Development Department prior to issuance of a building permit." ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. VII. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Site Development Permit 2001-723; a request of Rancho Capistrano Development Corporation for review of architectural and landscaping plans for three new casas prototype residential plans located north of Avenue 54 and east of Jefferson Street, within County Club of the Desert. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-22-02.wpd 15 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 1. Chairman Abels asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner None. 3. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Robert Wilkinson, representing the applicant, stated he was available for any questions. 4. Commissioner Butler asked the height of the front door. Mr. Wilkinson stated it was eight feet tall. 5. Commissioner Tyler asked how the curved glass would work with the Title 24 calcs in regard to Plan 1. Mr. Wilkinson stated it is a tempered glass and meets the requirements. 6. Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment. There being no further public comment, the public participation portion was closed and open for Commission discussion. 7. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Minute Motion 2002-001 approving Site Development Permit 2001-723, as submitted. Unanimously approved. B. Site Development Permit 2001-726; a request of Mike Mendoza, Project Designer for compatibility review of architectural and landscaping plans for a single family residence located at 4-550 Via Montana, north of Via Florence, within Lake La Quinta. 1. Chairman Abels asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Christine di lorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. There being no questions of staff, or the applicant, Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment. There being no 10 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-22-02.wpd 16 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 further public comment, the public participation portion was closed and open for Commission discussion 3. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-023 approving Site Development 2001-726, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. C. Site Development Permit 2001-727; a request of La Quinta Jefferson Fifty, LLC for review of architectural plans of three new prototype residential plans located north of Avenue 50 and west of Jefferson Street. 1. Chairman Abels asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Robbins stated the exterior elevations look out of proportion with the garage doors. 3. Commissioner Tyler suggested a condition be added to Plan 1, Type A. to rectify the problem 4. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Michael Kaufman, stated in regard to the garage door, the doors are 7 feet in height and are in line with the front plate elevation. 5. Commissioner Kirk asked if the architect had an explanation for the blank elevation. Mr. Kaufman stated Plan A will change to have a gable end and could be articulated. 6. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the meeting and opened for Commission discussion. 2,601 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-22-02.wpd 17 Planning Commission Minutes January 22, 2002 7. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Minute Motion 2002-002 approving Site Development Permit 2002-727, as amended: A. Condition #2.C: Add, "On Plans 1, 2, & 3 for Type A & B, additional articulation shall be provided on the facade between the garage door and roof eaves." Unanimously approved. Vill. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. IX. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: B. Commissioner Tyler gave a report on the City Council meeting of January 15, 2002. X. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Robbins to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held February 12, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 9:45 p.m. on January 22, 2002. Res ectfully submitted, cutive Secretary Ci f` Quinta, California 270 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-22-02.wpd 18 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: A(a MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA December 20, 2001 This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by Chairman Maria Puente at 3:00 p.m. who led the flag salute and asked for the roll call. I. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call. Present: Commissioners Irwin, Mitchell, Sharp, Wright, and Chairman Puente. Unanimously approved. Staff Present: Planning Manager Christine di lorio, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Secretary Carolyn Walker. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Mitchell to approve the Minutes of November 15, 2001, as submitted. Unanimously approved. V. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Phase II Cultural Resources Assessment for the La Quinta Grill; a request for approval of a Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment. Applicant: The Woodward Group Historic Consultant: LSA 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Commissioners Mitchell, Irwin, and Wright concurred with staff's recommendations. .Jr P ACAROLYN\HPC 12-20-01. wpd -1- Historic Preservation Commission Minutes December 20, 2001 3. Commissioner Sharp concurred with staff's recommendations, but asked what was going to be built on the site. Staff replied there would be three office buildings constructed of board and batten with a flat shingle tile roof. 4. Stewart Woodard, architect representing the applicant, clarified there were actually three structures. One single story, and the other two will be two stories. The plans would also utilize many of the trees on site. 5. Commissioner Wright asked if the water tower would remain since it was historic. The applicant replied he had two engineers looking at the tower and both found it unsafe. 6. Commissioner Irwin stated she had been researching information on this site and needed to speak to the former owner, Robert Cunard. He would know more about the history of the building and the tower. 7. Mr. Woodard stated he was trying to find further historic information on the tower. He also stated if the tower was of historical significance he would work with staff to try and preserve the structure. Currently, however, his contractors have informed him it is unsafe and will be dismantled piece by piece. 8. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Mitchell/Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2001-021 recommending approval of the Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the La Quinta Grill; located on the southeast corner of Calle Cadiz and Avenida Bermudas. Unanimously approved. B. Phase I Cultural and Paleontological Resource Assessment for Specific Plan 90- 016, Amendment #1; a request for approval of a Phase I Cultural and Paleontological Resources Assessment. Applicant: Toll Brothers - Historic Consultant: LSA. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. i PACAROLYN\HPC 12-20-01.wpd -2- Historic Preservation Commission Minutes December 20, 2001 2. Commissioner Mitchell had a question regarding the 15% portion of this property that was inaccessible due to the surrounding brush. Applicant's representative, Forrest Haag replied the area shown may have been overestimated because the Historic Consultant did record the flora coverage of the entire 385 acres. There was only one acre of Mesquite Thistle that was not included in the inventory. The acreage has continuously been planted in citrus groves, surveyed for home sites, and had trees removed, leaving only a few palms and thickets of mesquite which were identified in the study. The archeologists researched the history of the property and referred back to the 1990 Langwalter Archaeology Study that was done for the 90-016 EIR which was a very thorough investigation. So, the property has been thoroughly studied. 3. Commissioner Mitchell asked if the entire site had been disturbed. Mr. Forrest Haag stated it had and the Historic Consultant had identified several areas, on the property, that would require further study. 4. Commissioner Mitchell stated he had no other concerns other than he thought this area was a "high" or "moderate" area for paleontological resources. He also wanted to point out that doing paleontology assessments should be approached with a lot of care and consideration to avoid wasting the applicant's time and money. He stated the same items would continue to show up, such as fresh water clam shells and snails, if care was not exercised in ordering these studies. He asked if there were regulations for paleontology studies to avoid these problems. Staff stated the General Plan update has a Paleontological Section which is more definitive of what is required. Staff will obtain copies to give to the Commissioners. 5. Commissioner Wright concurred with staff's recommendations and Commissioner Mitchell's concerns. 6. Commissioner Irwin stated her main concern was the two sections identified and asked for monitoring during earth moving. Staff replied the project was conditioned to do so. 7. Commissioner Sharp and Chairman Puente concurred with staff's recommendations. 8. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Mitchell to adopt Minute Motion 2001-021 recommending approval of the Phase I Cultural and Paleontological Resources Assessment for Specific Plan 90-016, Amendment #1. Unanimously approved. 0 3 P:\CAROLYNNHPC12-20-01.wpd -3- Historic Preservation Commission Minutes December 20, 2001 VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS A. 1. Commissioner Wright brought up the subject of the next meeting date. He was concerned about the future time table for Item B. 2. Staff stated the normal meeting date would be January 17, but the meeting could be rescheduled to a later date to allow the applicant's archaeologist time to test the property and get a report with sufficient information for the Commission to take action on Phase II. That would allow the applicant to go to the City Council on February 5, 2002. 3. After general discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Mitchell to change the January Historic Preservation Commission meeting date from January 17, 2002 to January 31, 2002. Unanimously approved. B. Commissioner Irwin asked if there was any information on conferences in the first quarter of 2002. Staff replied none had been received as of this date. VIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Sharp to adjourn this meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission to the next regular meet rescheduled to be held on January 31, 2002. This meeting of the Historical Preservation Commission was adjourned at 3:28 p.m., November 15, 2001. Unanimously approved. Submitted by: A Carolyn alker Secretary PACAROLYN\HPC 12-20-01.wpd -4- REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: /rI MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA January 16, 2002 I. CALL TO ORDER 10:00 a.m. A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Committee was called to order at 10:06 a.m. by Planning Manager Christine di lorio who led the flag salute. B. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt and David Thoms. It was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Thoms to excuse Committee Member Cunningham. Unanimously approved. C. Staff present: Planning Manager Christine di lorio, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Associate Planner Greg Trousdell and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Planning Manager Christine di lorio asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of December 5, 2001. There being no corrections, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Thoms to approve the minutes as submitted. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Site Development Permit 2000-723; a request of Rancho Capistrano Development Company for review of architectural and landscaping plans for three new Casas prototype residential plans for the property located north of Avenue 54 and east of Jefferson Street within Country Club of the Desert. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. GAWPD0CS\ARLC\1-16-02.wpd 1 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes January 16, 2002 2. Committee Member Thoms had no comment. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked how the garage opens. Mr. Robert Wilkinson, representing the applicant, explained. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the water conservation model. Mr. Wilkinson explained it is the type of irrigation and plants to be used. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if this was for the models or the production units as well. Staff stated the models only. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if property owners would be able to request it for their homes. Mr. Wilkinson stated it was an option they would offer. Committee Member Bobbitt expressed his concern for the maintenance. Discussion followed regarding the irrigation system. 4. There being no discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Thoms/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2002-001 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-723, subject to the conditions as recommended. Unanimously approved. B. Site Development Permit 2001-724; a request of Family YMCA of the Desert for review of architectural plans for a 2,626 square foot addition to the YMCA la Quinta Preschool located at 49-955 Park Avenue. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Mr. Felipe Fregoso, representing the applicant, stated he was available to answer any questions. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he had no objections, it is a good plan. He asked what would happen when there are no landscape plans submitted at this level. Principal Planner Stan Sawa stated that since this is a minor change, staff will review and approve the landscaping changes. 4. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Thoms/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2002- 002 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001- 724, subject to the conditions as recommended. Unanimously approved. ' .i '0 G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\1-16-02.wpd 2 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes January 15, 2002 C. Site Development Permit 2001-725; a request of Carlos Gomez for Von's Supermarket for review of architectural and landscaping plans for the expansion of the Von's Supermarket located at 78-271 Highway 1 1 1 within Plaza La Quinta. 1. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Member Bobbitt asked about the four foot planter and the trellis. The applicant Carlos Gomez gave a presentation on the project. Bobbitt asked staff to explain their recommendation. Staff stated the landscaping in front of the cart wall was lost with the expansion and have a mural and tie in with the terrace effect. Mr. Gomez stated the decorative mosaic was intended to use a local artist for an artistic touch. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the depth and size of the parking lot planter wells and how is it determined who is responsible for the maintenance. Mr. Gomez explained there was a lot line adjustment making the expansion area part of Von's ownership. 3. Committee Member Thoms asked if the buildings next door to Von's were extending out to meet the Von's storefront. Mr. Gomez explained where it would be altered. Planning Manager Christine di lorio asked why the Fred Sands portion of the building was being altered. Mr. Gomez stated a portion would be removed to fit it in with the Von's addition. They could lower the tower to make it not appear top heavy. Committee Member Thoms stated he has problem with the architecture on the east end and the change to the Fred Sands building. Mr. Gomez stated they are simplifying the look. Committee Member Thoms stated he would rather have the expansion more in line with the other in -line tenants. 4. Committee Member Thoms asked what plants would be removed. Mr. Gomez stated the Pepper Trees would be removed and use something more consistent with desert plants. Committee Member Thoms stated his concern on how you would remove the tree within the parking lot tree wells. Also on the plant list for trees, the Yellow Oleander in a 15 gallon tree should not be used in a parking lot. It should be eliminated from the plant list. On i G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\1-16-02.wpd 3 t-� �- Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes January 15, 2002 5. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he concurred and as well the removal of the Sumac and suggested alternate species such as Australian Willow (Giejara parbiflora). 6. Committee Member Thoms asked that the planter be raised. 7. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Bobbitt/Thoms to adopt Minute Motion 2002- 003 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001- 725, subject to the conditions. A. Condition 1 .A. Remove "at grade". B. Condition 1.13. Eliminate the Yellow Oleander tree from the plant list and replace with Australian Willow (Giejara parbiflora) . C. Condition 1 .C. The eastern most parapet wall, inclusive of the Fred Sands building, shall be redesigned so as to be in scale and design with the in -line tenants to the east and approved by the Community Development Department. Unanimously approved. D. Site Development Permit 2001-726; a request of Mike Mendoza for review of architectural and landscaping plans for a single family residence located at 47-550 Via Montana. 1. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Thoms stated he may have a potential conflict of interest due to the proximity of his residence and the project site. The application was removed from the agenda. No action taken. E. Site Development Permit 2001-727; a request of La Quinta Jefferson Fifty, LLC for review of architectural plans for three new prototype residential plans located north of Avenue 50 and west of Jefferson Street. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community 2 `l J Development Department. ►�"04 G:\WPD0CS\ARLC\l-16-02.wpd 4 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes January 15, 2002 2. Committee Member Thorns asked why the cultured stone was being used. Mr. Michel Kaufman, representing the applicant, stated to provide architectural articulation. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he agreed with changing the hip roof to the gable. The market place will dictate what will sell. He agrees with staff's recommendations and add the wood composite to the trellis beams as well. 4. Committee Member Thoms stated that the trellis and posts could be beefed up to look heavier. 5. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the window treatment using the vinyl doors, it looks flat. He would suggest adding a plant-ons to give a depth. Mr. Kaufman stated there are plant-ons proposed. 6. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Bobbitt/Thoms to adopt Minute Motion 2002- 004 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001- 727. A. Condition #2.B.: Add trellis beams as a composite material. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None Vill. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Thoms to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on March 13, 2002. This meeting was adjourned at 1 1:01 a.m. on January 15, 2002. Respectfully sub itted, Y W ER, �"xecutive Secretary City of Quinta, California f J G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\1-16-02.wpd 5 �—Q DEPARTMENT REPORT: I- A La -I c V W: Qum& IvcorMTM 4 7 OF 9ti TO: FROM: DATE: RE: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager February 19, 2002 Department Report - Response(s) to Public Comments P p -e,,i / The following is the response to public comments made at the February 5, 2002 City Council meeting: 1 . Mr. Seth Etinger, 78-720 Avenida La Fonda, mentioned his appreciation for the Calle Rondo drainage improvement project. He also spoke regarding the high cost of flood insurance in the area due to the "A-0" Zoning. He requested that the City look into the elimination of the "A-0" Zoning. • Mayor Pro Tem Sniff asked staff to research this subject. Staff will complete the research and notify Mr. Etinger and the City Council of the results. 2. Ms. Gayle Cady, 82-814 Avenue 54, requested signs for the Madison Street equestrian trails and also expressed her appreciation for the City's cooperation in the 2"d Annual Madison Save -the -Trails Ride. She also mentioned the recent improvements at Lake Cahuilla. • Mayor Pro Tem Sniff thanked Ms. Cady for her comments. Staff will review the request and notify the City Council of the outcome. DEPARTMENT REPORT: 3- A MARCH 5 MARCH 14-17 MARCH 19 MARCH 20 APRIL 2 APRIL 5 APRIL 16 APRIL 25-27 CITY COUNCIL'S UPCOMING EVENTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING LA QUINTA ARTS FESTIVAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING (General Plan Hearing) CITY COUNCIL MEETING VILLAGE FAIRE EVENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING 20TH ANNIVERSARY EVENTS (see attached) MAY 7 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 21 CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 18 CITY COUNCIL MEETING R 2 .1. 2011" ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION 4 0 UPCOMING EVENTS APRIL 25 APRIL 26 APRIL 27 APRIL 28 CHAMBER MIXER - CITY HALL (5:30 - 7:30 P.M.) MULTI -GENERATIONAL TALENT SHOW - LA QUINTA SENIOR CENTER (7:00 P.M.) COMMUNITY PARADE - FRITZ BURNS COMMUNITY PARK 00:00 A.M.) COMMUNITY PICNIC - FRITZ BURNS COMMUNITY PARK 01:00 A.M.) ARTS & CRAFTS SHOW - LA QUINTA SENIOR CENTER 0:00 - 4:00 P.M.) COVE OASIS TRAIL HIKE - COVE OASIS (5:30 P.M.) STAR -GAZING - COVE OASIS (7:30 P.M.) FISHING DERBY - LAKE CAHUILLA 00:00 P.M. - 10:00 A.M.) GEM OF THE DESERT RUN - FRITZ BURNS COMMUNITY PARK (7:00 A.M.) ART UNDER THE UMBRELLAS - LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION 00:00 A.M. - 4:00 P.M.) ENTERTAINMENT WITH FIREWORKS - LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL (5:30 P.M.) 2 8 February 2002 Monthly Planner r 1 2 January March S MT W T F S S MT W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 31 �z ky: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2:00 PM City 10:00 AM ALRC Council Meeting 11 12 13 14 15 16 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V. 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM Energy/ Safety -Perkins Mosquito Abate. Pena Envi-Sniff 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins 5:30 PM Invest- 7:00 PM Cultural -Perkins 7:00 PM Planning ment Advisory Arts Commission 6:00 PM League Commission Board of Cities-Riv.Div. Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission Valentines Day 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Ah President's 9:00 AM CVB- 3:30 PM Historic IRDay (City Henderson Preservation Hall 2:00 PM City Commission CLOSED) Council Meeting 24 25 26 27 28 6:00 PM CVAG- 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM LAFCO- { Exec Com-Pena Commission Human/Comm- Henderson ' Meeting Adolph 4 P 4:00 PM DRRA',<„ Airp-Henderson m. Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 2/14/2002 Fel March 2002 Monthly Planner 1 4 5 6 7 8 2:00 PM City 10:00 AM ALRC 12:00 PM Mayors Council Meeting Lunch 2 0 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V. 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM Energy/ Safety -Perkins Mosquito Abate. Pena Envi-Sniff 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins 5:30 PM Invest- 7:00 PM Cultural -Perkins 7:00 PM Planning ment Advisory Arts Commission 6:00 PM League Commission Board of Cities-Riv.Div. Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 9:00 AM CVB- Henderson 7:00 PM Special City Council 3:30 PM Historic Preservation 2:00 PM City Meeting (General Commission St. Patrick's Council Meeting Plan) Day 1 st Day of Spring 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 6:00 PM CVAG- 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM LAFCO- Exec Com-Pena Commission Human/Comm- Henderson Meeting Adolph Easter 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson °� reDruary S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 " 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6,h 7 8 9 10 11 12 13'' 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27� 28 29 30 e� Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 2/14/2002 April 2002 Monthly Planner .. • • . .. • . - .. • .. - . .. • . .. • .. • .. � 1 2 3 4 5 6 2:00 PM City 10:00 AM ALRC r Council Meeting P ik r� tt 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V. 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM Energy/ Safety -Perkins Mosquito Abate. Pena Envi-Sniff 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins 5:30 PM Invest- 7:00 PM Cultural Daylight Savings -Perkins 7:00 PM Planning ment Advisory Arts Commission Time 6:00 PM League Commission Board of Cities-Riv.Div. Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 9:00 AM CVB- 3:30 PM Historic Henderson Preservation 2:00 PM City Commission Council Meeting 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM LAFCO- Commission Human/Comm- Henderson Meeting Adolph 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson 20th Anniversary Events 28 29 30 Exec Com-Pena K'„ March May S M T W T F S S M T W T F S. ;. 1 2 3 4 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 10 11, , 10 11 12 13 14 15 16; ;y 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 jl, ? f �w 24 25 26 27 28 29 30., 31 26 27 28 29 30 31 ; : Creator Plus on 2/14/2002 Printed by Calendar DEPARTMENT REPORT: V _ _: IN ORPORATED 5 OF T19� TO: FROM: DATE: RE: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Tom Hartung, Director of Building & Safety —j--4 - February 19, 2002 Monthly Department Report - January 2002 Attached please find the statistical summaries for building permits, Animal Control, Code Compliance, and business licenses for the month of January. The reports depict the following highlights: • Year to date building permit valuation is $10,836,154.60 which represents an issuance of 224 building permits through January; • 155 animal control cases have been handled through January; • 137 code compliance cases have been initiated through January; • 6 new licenses were issued to La Quinta based businesses in January; • $880.00 - garage sale permit income in January; • $620.00 - Senior Center income in January: New Life Community Church $ 495.00 Cove Neighborhood Assoc. Meeting 125.00 $ 620.00 28 Cl 00 o O (`M O O O O O O O O O O O O o O o O O O O O O O O O O O o O U) LLI LO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CD ❑ N e c.i a) 69 69 69 69 09i 69 69 69 Efi Efi 69 69 Ef? 69 cc J CL 69 60/ iA J m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r M 00 O M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a= V)o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o co Z N Ef) 0) 6H 69 Ef? 69 Ef? Ef? 69 Eft Ef? Ef? Efi 6ci 69 69 co 0 � 40 69 Lo N O O In M O O M "T O O O O O Ln m (0 O O LO CO IcT O O O O O O (D 0o N `cT 0) O co m O 69 O I- � 0) 00 00 m O 69 00 M M O 69 O U-) O Ln O 69 O 69 6 00 1 0) 6 r- e: N Q r CA M O O m M N to 1-- N M tl- m Ef} co ti W. N 11- W) co co r LO Ef} Ef) Ef? N E!3 V), m lf7 U)i NN W � N 40 U- ~ Ln O In O m O O O M O V) O O O CO N O N O M O O O LO (D O (D O O 00 00 ct O M O O CA 00 O 00 cM O O O O O f- T- CO r- W a = H M rn 69 I- o r- rn 00 r- 0') LO &9. e- T- (M � 69 LO M LO (n 69 69 O LO 0J 6ci r N ti z eM 0 M N Ef! 6H N ti Ul) N N W O LO r EfT to e% N Ef? Ef) 69 6+i T- N Ef? 4i9 (n V O M O O III C? LO LO O 0o O O O O O O CA O O O O O I� O O O O O O O O O (D O N M N O V). Cn M CF (0 O LO O 61), O O 00 O Ef? O O LO I- O 6R O 69 00 00 O 69 O f-� O Q ❑ Ln V V M Ln M N O cM O C 1l H Z P: Q N ~ N M O 0) N C9 1 N (D N LO a0 O N (D O N (D O M (D er [*- cn 0 J N V 69 69 Ef? O E9 Ef) M 69 00 Q 2 Q � Q LA- O LV a M Z J O O o O (fl LO (fl O M O O O O O o LO (o O 0 O o O r O O O o O o O v O M O W N O cM 00 O O O O O I` O O O It tc> f- Z N 69 (0 t- r- LC) E!i LO 00 69 O O 6969. O U❑ _ Z O I7 I- CO r- O O N O r O❑ } O 00 00 Ni M .-- LO O N I� cD ❑ m V ❑ � Ef) 69 69 CO. E!3 E!? E9 CD H CO Z O O O O O (fl LO O O M O O O O O O LO M O O O O O O O O O O O O IT O 00 O W V = N N O 69 (D M r- 00 r- O Ln O 69 O LO 00 O Efl O O Il- O O 69 O 69 O O qT LO 14 W) �- ll* O V 00 ti O llz� O N O z 0 O 00 00 M IcT M M C CM IT 69 LO 00 O IcT M O O N Il- O cD M � E9 E9 Efl 64 E!> Ef) Ef) O I E9 � :9 O C) O eM O 00 N M O O CV O LO N O (0 O O N O Ln M ❑ Q p J W Q co 00 O N 00 N Ui O Ln Il- O N co O O N N co Iq U) ❑ M M Ln N N U) O Z U ❑ W J J Z = W �j z WW 00 M w 0 N 00 M N LO e- O Ln I- if ) O N 00 0 0 O O N O N F— M qq a= a F— Q W 0 cl N Z O p z J O Q U - J -i w g -' ¢ O J Q z W Q� 5 g g Q 1 L w Q Q U Z z a O F- Q J O w Q a U P Z F— Z C7 J LL_ W z Z � Q m � J J W (DW J W 2 W p_ W N J zv� � C) W O U cn _Q F— O O J w J O w w O U m w Ua F- ANIMAL CONTROL REPORT FOR: January, 2002 Steve Alexander, Moises Rodarte, and Jackie Misuraca ANIMAL PICKUPS YEAR TO YEAR TO INCIDENTS JAN DATE 02 DATE 01 HANDLED JAN Dogs Alive 35 35 54 Bite Reports 1 Dead 2 2 3 Animal Trap OTI 3 3 1 Set Ups 1 Cats Alive 3 Dead 7 OTI 0 Other Animals Alive 0 Dead 5 TOTAL ANIMALS 3 7 0 0 5 24 4 0 1 2 Alive 38 38 79 Dead 14 14 9 OTI 3 3 1 TOTAL ANIMALS REMOVED 55 55 89 VIOLATIONS: No Owner Warnings Dogs at Large 17 0 Noise Disturbance 0 0 Defecation removal 0 0 License Violation 0 0 Other 0 Monthly Total 17 0 YEAR TO YEAR TO DATE 02 DATE 01 1 4 1 14 Cruelty to Animals 1 1 Vicious Animal Restraining 1 1 Special Hour Patrols 2 2 Zoning Violations 0 0 Lost & Found 28 28 Animal Rescue 2 2 Outside Agency 0 0 City Reclaims 11 11 Other 8 8 TOTALS 55 55 Citations 14 0 2 12 0 28 YEAR TO DATE 17 0 28 TOTAL MONTHLY INCIDENTS HANDLED- JAN. 02- 155 / JAN. 01 - 330 YEAR TO DATE INCIDENTS HANDLED- JAN. 02 - 15 5 / JAN. 01 - 3 3 0 29 2 0 19 22 106 CODE COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR: Jan. 2002 Jan. 02 YEAR TO DATE 02 YEAR TO DATE 01 ABATEMENTS: Nuisance Abatements Started 69 69 108 Weed Abatements Started 4 4 6 Vehicle Abatements Started 63 63 142 Dwelling Abatements Started 1 1 0 TOTAL STARTED 137 137 256 TOTAL COMPLETED 122 122 267 Home Occupation Inspections 9 9 12 Business License Inspections 0 0 4 Garage sale permits Issued 88 88 84 283 N N N N N N 000000 d O O O O O O N N N N N N p LO O O M M LO r- B 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) 0 O Z C� H C� p w Z w W O0 z z pLu y p Q O O Z w 4) W F- W c J •3W(nJmw— wQgF-> F- w U)W Z U M CO CO Il- 00 M O tt Il- eM O CD �t — mt 00 y 00 � r*- Cp I�L N I` C; Ln C. I` I- I- I- M M 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 1(0 ti ti ti cCD ti 'N fM co ce) m C') ce) l[) U') U') 0 U') U) —1 N N N N N N O CA CA CA 0 0 d H 1 Q Q Q Q Q Q U U U U U U FQ-FQ--FQ-FQ-F- >,Z_Z_Z_Z_Z_Z_ 5 5 5 5 5 5 ti O w Z LU W Q _ � � U p LLJ Q r- � LU Q U 0 Z W p Z= 0 Z a W W O w > O > w 0 �Q2UQtiU O Lid M O O D O I- � w M V' 1 CO LO I- U') 00 ICT m � � � LO � � U U Z Z 0 H Z W LLJ J J W Q W U p Q Z LLJ '6 W Z o (nW m--W N ww WUO c° Lu cog H � � zzz�z� EOQz o c U) w W p p LU U) n c 0U) ww Um� �1JUwa}Q p � N I— t- LO _ CA O O O CA I` CD CD I,- I- CD 70 0 0 0 0 00 0 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 4 XP QUM& A-Z v 5 OF TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: JERKY HERMAN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR llU� DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 2002 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 2002 Attached please find a copy of the Community Development Report which outlines the current cases processed by staff for the month of January. 2� PAMonthly Department Report.wpd 1 F- Z W Q a a Z W O W W Z D O U Z O U Q Z O I — a_ U W 0 E E E E E E E E .n E E E E E E > > > cn cn N cn co N cn cn c � N N �— O O N LO M O N O O O O cn E" W O cc a a) L o o U > Li U a) C +� c E 4n ` O c c E n ._ c _ {r J cn a cn �- cn E c 0 (n +J c -v a) Q o 0) c 'c N � c a) E v) cn a) c a O L. � w U o C N + E a) o Q c O Q) > c m V a) a� C a E O U o .i U N Z 9 ti 0 '1� O a A O .0 co -C -a _co C a. a) E �� Q) O a) N V 007 cn U U O (D � w O � C Q a '+r o Q o v N O N 0 3 r- LO ct O N � J (> 00 U '� 3 Qa.�U�O O �O a) a) 0 0 > ° .;-, C a0U Q U ' ' 0 NM�O Cp pp U U U N a.UU•- cv O N N 0 N� N U U a_U c O C co -o c O m CN U O Q� QN co a) Q c O cn +, cn C a. J L O C C s +� Q Q' O O N +O a) "a +-� U)> O c E U o °-) uj L ° C ° O oC cc= o Q c c o °° a)O O O c "a > >. a) C OJ > Q-C J C += o .0a) Cn CD U co N — O :p s � ('� O co c a) C -p C a) a. -0 N co L p -p = ' L L a) p co C O s L M J p > +-+ C 0) co p O O cn ,� 0 E Da.. -a co -p = m O co C N co NN 0 c°° M (7 cV +p, C� c o .� � o p -a ocO cn oc) a)° a. o E c O O > o o Cc C cn a) o -0 C oa cn a ° o-0 p Oa E `o a cn ` a cc 0 Nca) ai °o- Q c co i c cU o c5�� C:� - -0+� a� o a� aa cn a°. a) -v -p •L a) M .� a) -p 'C C a c ° X C7a' co N L o c co '. � p - O>EE C C c� L co C7 c cn c co = O E C ' c� Fn +pi +r > .0 co "a c O Co ° co O a) cc Lr) O o aci a� -p U 4- 0) o co o C a U E co '+� c `c +�-+ `'- O r- (D • C 0 O L O '+__ •� 4- _ - +� a a) 3S p a) O a) .- cn co E p o p cn o .N ° L�.- O O c o° L 0 cn Q N X N> +-+ N 2 L +-1 O (n O O cn 0 O> a) O O a) IM ' O " a) ' M v ' � 0 fl. Q O N to O a N a) co ' C — ° = — Q a 0 a a� v a) a) o +-' C a) c >, +_ N c co 'a c . .0 Im nQ=Q °F=-� cc: 2Q 22 cc -OvoQQ� Cn +co'jU w +-i c co . a_ w o E MO o U � O N V- a) 0 � O z O 0 CO M ° O L 0 c„) N e- 0 N 0 ' 6 F- U U co N � cn N J c a. L r, c p � c Q �� o 0 0 F- O N O a. a a 0o 00 r' N O m 6 � a) = O CM }' Q� C QO QO CL O CL O a. U) C7 O a- C7 N C7 N F— M t 0 a V W a > Q I v 00 N N Op0 r-OC)LO r- N cL U U 2aU M O C C U ` N N �� 00LO r- N N U U O CL Lo OCCL fl.QQ Q 1 CN NO 00 OC)` CN r- U U a. N U U > O CLOO L QQ � N O 0 N r-N N� .- ' U U 0-U N C p 0 O `�- C" O �' a) O 0 }, N p cC `+- O O C cA O +•' C 0) C L cy i O cB O C +j 0 �"' _ .> L O C N -p cn L U 0 0� L '}+U) 0 -C � p m cn 'o i 'tn N � cv a) a) a) � +i Q C (� C• C O a) M C. co 0 O -p O aj o � O s a cB 0 cn a, co O v �.., L a) a) `- O O O O L a)'L •cv a)�_.� co O� Cu a) cnQNN O O a) v 'L O cn C -Cm +-� CDN L pLO co 0 O C O C — 'a cn 0) = a) O a) c� O _ _ cr O r'U C pC O -CN Lo O 0CD E ELL N CD >�-0; OQ � +�CO ptU }' o C O cn -a E C O -a � U)U -a v) aC Cn Cf) +, O a L� E a O o> M C U, Co O a) a) Q mp > +�N 'a CO . O�o ,N a) c an O� Q0 a) O � �cuQ ' Cn '= �N E Q�Cm L aL EL 4- E Ocn >` C u) C Q p 0 "a CL +� -C cn a) C > co 0 O D > C O,co Oo V +� p0� O m 'O a •C co00 c m E a n C O O a) O •C QOcn� (n o E C a) C ' C + E E D-C N a) < a) cn O •> L N �> L "a C Z3 C N '� O N+ > j cn O C i ,C cn CD C +r � O (n Q• C> cn Q 0 0 � U O O � J O C O U C cc p E� L (n 02 c0 .O E Q O C 0 cn a) C O cn m E +, O W O C C m C M Q N •�0--, a) E C1 N C •O r- M " 0 N L a Q O a� 00 M 0 0 C 00 d CO V0) O N-cn 02 O co J O 0 0a) O N N COY) C- ob C CN I- -J CN O ~Uu I~ —co (CL � C7 0 C7U M 29111 0 004 V h a -0 O L- a N O 0\0 -0 O OL as Q Q �00 �`—N N N �— � � U ` a a 0-- 00 N � N U`— Q L a a _ NQ 0 00 N � N U Cr Q -0 O >NN L a� Q a a N Q 0 CO N � N U Q '0 O L ao Q a a N Q o 00 N � N U Cr QCL 'p O N> L a�- Q a a N Q o 00 N � N � Ufr Lr QC N O M O v) c •L co = O }' U o 0 0 0- 0 °-C %os � a) o c �0 o -' a� 0 c 1 m Co � •x a) ai _ U .� a) L Co co '+.1 m co co � /1 6i� _M a -n L c� C c� p .c >, Co ai -� c C ` a 0) O cv L 0 (n ° a L o � > cn OO O p1E0Z) E co O W Na) rnU C O O 4— C O U U Q _ 0 0 � 0� L a C O C C O '+-� cn C U CL p � CO _` C NO C U � N (� d' co 4-J m +., LO O -0 M Co "0 > Cu c > 0) O �"' � U cn `� Co C;) a m a cU c� P Co — -� Ch C >` }% Cl) 0) N N O L O Cl) CO -0 c 0 C 0 (D a' At M +-� CD a� L c� CO -a Cl) ' a m U o Cl) �- > •L w- C z C U C ° Co -0 c 0 N E C -0 •�CD ) U Co N � +5 > O C C 0 -0 0 O -0 0 '+, " ,M C N� p N O m C- C 0 .a w-- L +-j Q cn to CT cn O N a m a� v a U (D +� :3 c C `� 0 'v� 0) •� c -0 C c c s m O M +•• C �_ a� ,+� C (n o C U •> cn a� �- C a L cv O cv a Q c C a� ac .o a O .a c0 ca .0 a a N �- O C O E M +-' X +� m O 0 0 C O LO O •>_ O O ai 0) O �. E p o c C L +.+ L Oa E O -C a� L•> +-' O a) a) 'a j N M .0 L +; 0 O. C O i L c N O 0 M L 0 i N N C O `E'.. '0 U ° C C .p 'O 0 0)() E 0 -0 O O +_+ ° U c� � �� O C°a) C 0 c O O LL- O � O '0 G) O i N= a L '> _ 0 p '> '> �> U p '> 0 cn N '> D p > � �O " "O .2) O � N O a '0 E 0 N C N +r Q p 'O O 0' N E p C C U 0 N N— C m O-C C p cn O O CC (n C m N p Cr 0 N O ac L a O T +-+ cc a U) O p cn N (n +•j L p >, >, U L C oJc ° o c •a o Cnn L � LO l..� E '0 O m Cn L Z � r � //off� c -� U a� N a) 0 L 000Co 00 o o �,LO U ° 0 �- Q� 0 N0 =U ,C 0 C a a-N E a. �= U� co c J —i (n N N �- LO ?� N (O L,L � (") I� Y I� M '^ +-j VJ M p s{. I� N L 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 E co 0 0 rl 0� 0� 0^ O 0 0 0CN O OQ OU 0 0� O 0 0 00 a. CN r— Q) U) +� O Q O N O O 0 'p 0 >(13 0 CJ CL (n LLJ N (n > (1) CL (i)I— bp. 3 Q�?5 2 C N N N a. = a. C N (0 N CL N a OU .0 •O cu •a Q O a E U C .O a Q -a`+- ° v, 4- 0 O O 0 o co co U a� .,0 Cl) � O O �O 'E i•• L M CD co L L- Cn C 00 O O O O C L a W C� CNO O U (n Ln C ' cm .� C O M 00 cmC' E (n � O �� //�� V J (� L 'L C: Q� O C M 3: N C •Q Cu u N c 0 a� a)> E U cn O L O o oa �Q (a O �+.. c aJ E— c .CO - N Q �. .Y O e- ca N C O LU •� J ma y_ O (n O N C C -a O .0 .0 � i +-+ O sU C L p U) +•+ O U p U 0 0 U C -C C �, O N O 4O +r p (' . a O C +.j O E 0 Q +- m �O O f-+ C (n (a o E u) co O 0),M u- En C ° C N L- •� O C N N C C O :0 O ca upi co N M Q: C7 O Q cn C U- cn Qr O C • C �C C L O Q� "� J C Q) -C O a� Q E Q • a) 0 0 � 00 co N • • n It e- 0 VO �0CQ0 �O>UM N Q N�� a�o a) (nU �m c (n (n C70 �(n Eel rl- O 0. W cc ch Q F— F— V LLJ O cc CL ..I LLJ V G. r- 00 � V 75 N N CD 0 n to 00 e= O 0 0 c 0 0 0 E v o M do c 0 L o O_ Ln o 0 o' o 0 0 o 0 O E �„� M O O C. a� co O O J Y M O � N O v � o c a c Q a �a � O C C `° D cc = ao a> > aci co aci aoi C7 Q W C7 W Z as s cia .r C, as "- o O c c c > V Z c «� c_ •C +� i C N ,.a C, C O H 0 = _ E C 'a E O C V D bp. 3 O a rs! co A 2 a; 0 Lfi 7 DEPARTMENT REPORT: OF ti TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY CO NCIL FROM: DODIE HORVITZ, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTO DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 2002 UPCOMING EVENTS OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2O02: March 1 *Free Energy Assistance March 1 Village Fair in La Quinta, 50's and 60's Sock Hop Theme March 4 *Monthly Putting Contest March 5 *Free AARP Tax Assistance March 5 *Estate Planning Seminar March 5 Conversational Italian for Travelers, Senior Center March 5 The Art of Painting, Senior Center March 6 *New Bridge Plus Lessons March 6 *Desert Museum's Art Seminar March 6 Hatha Yoga, Senior Center March 8 *Cardiac Therapy Seminar March 9 South of the Border Shopping to Algodones March 9 Mastering Microsoft Word, Senior Center March 11 *Tennis Koffee Klatch March 11 Itty Biddy Sports, La Quinta High School March 12 *CPR Class March 12 *Free Health Screenings March 12 Tumble Tot Gymnastics, Senior Center March 13 Mini Bytes Computer for Kids, Senior Center March 15 *Free HI -CAP Counseling March 16 Tiny Tot Olympics, Fritz Burns Park March 18 Classic & Latin Ballroom Dance, La Quinta High School March 19 *Free Hearing Consultations March 19 Jazzercize Classes, La Quinta High School March 21 *Free Medicare and Insurance Counseling March 21 Shop Fashion Island in Newport Beach March 26 *AARP Mature Driving March 27 *Free Legal Consultation March 30 Annual Egg Hunt & Chalk Drawing Contest *Daytime Senior Center class or activity �1 Community Services Department Attendance Report for the Month of January 2002 Summary Sheet Program 2002 2001 Variance Meetings Per Month 2002 2001 Leisure Classes 387 172 215 30 12 Special Events 3 0 3 1 0 Adult Sports 298 552 -334 18 12 Senior Center 2350 2160 190 167 138 Total 3038 2884 74 216 162 Senior Services Senior Center 460 557 -97 16 17 Total 460 557 -97 16 17 Sports Complex Use La Quinta AYSO 1,450 1350 100 25 20 LQ Sports & Youth 500 200 300 4 4 Total 1,950 1550 400 29 24 Total Programs 51448 4,9911 377 2611 203 Volunteer Hours Senior Center 766 799 -33 Community Services 6 0 0 Total Volunteer Hours 772 799 -33 Monthly Revenue Senior Center $ 15,452.00 $ 13,108.00 $ 2,344.00 Community Services $ 13,589.00 $ 14,324.00 $ (735) Total Revenue $ 29,041.00 $ 27,432.00 $ 1,609.00 Revenue Year to Date Senior Center $ 50,687.00 $ 37,812.00 $ 12,875.00 Community Services $ 40,635.00 $ 36,589.00 $ 4,046.00 Total Revenue to Date $ 91,322.00 $ 74,401.00 $ 16,921.00 29 Community Services Program Report for January 2002 2002 2002 2001 2001 2002 2001 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Meetings Meetings Leisure Classes Beginning Computers 8 16 10 20 -4 2 2 Intermediate Computers 4 12 5 15 -3 3 3 Itty Biddy Sports 4 8 0 0 8 2 0 Jazzercize 10 40 0 0 40 4 0 Hatha Yoga 31 186 27 81 105 6 3 Adobe Photoshop 6 18 0 0 18 3 0 Latin Ballroom Dance 16 32 22 44 -12 2 2 English Horse Back 6 12 6 12 0 2 2 Art of Painting 7 21 0 0 21 3 0 Italian for Travelers 14 42 0 0 42 3 0 Totals 106 387 70 172 215 30 12 I I 2nn2 2nn2 20o1 2001 2002 2001 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Meetings Meetings Special Events YAT Christening Party 3 3 0 0 3 1 0 Totals 31 31 01 01 31 1 0 ,2nn,q 2nn2 2nni 2001 2002 2001 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Meetings Meetings Adult Sports Open Basketball M/T 98 98 72 72 26 16 8 Adult Soccer League 1001 2001 1201 480 -3601 21 4 Totals 1981 2981 1921 552 -3341 18 12 Recreation Totals 1 3071 688 262 724 -1 141 49 24 Page 2 ��3 Senior Center Attendance 2002 2002 2001 2001 Registered Total We—gistered Total Meetings Participants Participation articipants Participation ariance 2002 2001 Senior Activities ACBL Bridge 286 286 323 323 -37 5 4 Ballroom Dance, Complimentary 16 16 15 15 1 1 1 Bridge, Duplicate/Social 517 517 542 542 -25 10 12 Dog Training, Complimentary 9 9 10 10 -1 1 1 Ice Cream Social 25 25 52 52 -27 4 2 Monthly Birthday Party 37 37 36 36 1 1 1 Monthly Luncheon 87 87 92 92 -5 1 1 Movie Time 83 83 70 70 13 14 8 Putting Contest 11 11 7 7 4 1 1 Seminars 19 19 0 0 19 2 0 Tennis Social 4 4 25 25 -21 1 1 Senior Activity Total 1094 1094 1172 1172 -78 41 32 Senior Leisure Courses Ballroom Dance 19 57 18 33 24 4 4 Ceramics 15 50 11 31 19 5 4 Computer 38 38 46 70 -32 6 15 Cooking 18 19 0 0 19 1 0 Dog Training Class 11 18 7 25 -7 4 4 Exercise 56 501 49 384 117 12 11 Knitting 3 12 0 0 12 4 0 Stained Glass 10 26 9 18 81 3 2 Watercolor 12 41 10 37 4 4 4 Senior Leisure Courses Total 182 762 150 598 164 43 44 Senior Leisure Classes Bridge Lessons 241 241 151 151 90 12 8 Computer Tutor 8 8 23 23 -15 7 20 Creative Writing 18 18 38 38 -20 5 5 Golden Tones 32 32 51 51 -19 2 4 Leathercraft 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 Painting 18 18 32 32 -14 3 5 Quilting 43 43 30 30 13 4 4 Rug Hooking 9 9 12 12 -3 3 3 Tai Chi 39 39 21 21 18 3 3 Tap Dance 22 22 4 4 18 38 6 Woodcarving 63 63 28 28 35 5 4 Senior Leisure Classes Total 494 494 390 390 104 83 62 TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAMS 1770 2350 1712 2160 190 167 138 Senior Services A.A.R.P. "55 Alive" 41 41 54 54 -13 2 2 Ambassadors 90 90 98 98 -8 n/a I n/a Bono's Mobile Office 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 FIND Food Distribution 269 269 329 329 -60 4 4 Health Screenings 29 29 34 34 -5 2 2 1. 1. D. Energy Assistance 6 6 12 12 -6 3 4 I. I. D. Energy Assistance/No fee 1 1 2 2 -1 1 1 Legal Consultation 11 11 17 17 -6 2 1 Medicare/Hi Cap Consultation 10 10 6 6 4 n/a n/a Share Meetings/Sign-up 2 2 4 4 -21 1 2 TOTAL SENIOR SERVICES 460 460 557 557 -97 16 17 SENIOR CENTER TOTAL 2230 2810 2269 2717 93 1 ' SSA Page 3 0 v —� DEPARTMENT REPORT: H I.vcox M44`�t OF f Y TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Roy F. Stephenson, P.E., Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: February 19, 2002 RE: Public Works/Engineering Department Report for the Month of January 2002 Attached please find the following: 1. Citizen Service Request Summary; 2. Encroachment Permit and Plan Check Services Summary; 3. Capital Improvement Plan Status Update. Ro . St ph nson, P.E. Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020219Dept.wpd r� 0 F- Z W a� _z Q �y a. V Q J � LL Se 00 UV J m D 0. 2 W d W w W U W O o 0 0 o o 0 0 0 N O O O O O O O M o O 0 O co O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O r- 00 O O O O 00 O O O O ti o 0 0 0 00 O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O T- Ln o 0 0 0 0 0 V- o 0 0 qq o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O M O r- 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 N N M O 0 0 iN ic:l O M VC-) LO o o M � O rn 002 W Q z Q 30. CJ o J � LL Ce OD H C) V m a N O Q z Q C� G M z O F- LU a 2 Q O w u.l V- O Q z Q Z U 00 0� 0 0� j O co O O O Lo O 000� O O _ 6q Q9. 69 69- 6{} J a moo 00 00 0 00 N N N N N N N N N �i 0 ti N N N NN 00 CM NM WO O O O O O O O O Q. Of a _ UZ Z Q Q(nw0 MXo 00 0w�>0w0 I m J W m JLLU)a~�Y W - W V W U O wZ>UZ>U J J F— w Z0�.�a w a O Q D Q_ J 2 F W WZ �Z �o U�pa =O I- O Jp�U� Y ... z0 w Z Z w�l- O�Z2U a U) Z w az a U > J Q Z w .-. a z< -aZzQ >ZwF Dd ZWoo� 0�wpZ}�. �QwQU) u'(D OZ-� ��>�C) 2ui Z Q W a a> aW (D0 0U)` Z rj) 0J 000 D ts o� ts U z a J a z W E W 0 cc IL o� a W J a C.� LL to O O O � C C L M a c c O Ri E Cb. C C 6O c Cl td co to V UO c o O c O -0c O a) E � o2j �+ +.r a U to ��,, U N v c N i ° o CD o C°c CA s � . 0 U > N o t +, U +1 LO• a)UQ 0 � U E +U�D o (n +r O c �cm U o �•+ CFcm U C CD c ~ Q'� � sa`. o cID U cm U o rn m e 'p to P o rn v to •�^ Y o rn N N .� to N U }' tc m to Q +-J O- CL c m +�-' to ~ N cJ 'p C'C .� C .N c tUO�(nH +`+ N +� a) c tUO�U) two +r tU N O O N U O> U O O to G O 0+`r N O O 60 0 U U a m D U U a U U a U � N O N O N O N O LO coo N 0 �" 0 O 0 0 ccO 'o o o 0 O O N O 0 CO 0 (fl Cn UJ 4-1 oo 0) CD O O CY) CD H LO N o o CD W � O CD 0) Cl) N N m N 00 N O rr ^^ V J L cn V 7 co ui E .a CD w cc CL U +j O U a U c a. � o U a) US aS � .� O co m -C a co C CL U U C IT C O a0-0 .O v� N 0 N a o o C a) � O N O E 0 4-0 O O E o — O Q + 00 O 6V 0 00 00 N O O O E +' O C C a) M N L mCD +r O It 4-+ a� C cp N a) ±+ a=� m++ a C Co _O O 3 N o _N C. ^ v p U > >� "'> yam; c 00 cc E a O Q m CO — o spa to c� a� cO N O L 0 N � H o w a '0 O U c r N C too E N U- O N LU U O aD E O y O O 0 mw� 06 O D m +' CD a paCD ,6a E to Q U � a) U c >, c 0 c cn �!—v '> nai rn c aO � a ow 0V nsO W � OOU� M Op im L .. co o ` O o Mw a) O,o E f 'o O L O Y m e _•� 00 rn? '+r • CC 0 M c� o m z a a. L `- U� c cc i-' c N c cc3 a c ca C C co `° fl- U c co c m "p LM 0 0 0 oUUa a) om a) O O +- O C 0 0UU a) O O N oU�0 a) O oU ;° c a) � 0 0O a) O a� U) cnQ 0 a.,� oU oUm Z N H O O N O N O N O N O M O N O O M O C in O io 0o co i LO i in O N O N N N N N cM N N O LO 'd' M to to M LO 0 O C O O N O O O N O V— O O N O M O N O y CO N N N N Q N M ' Z T— co 0 0 O 0 O M I� M (M O N O (M W O N O M O (M I� Oo In N LO r- LO .-- O O O oo N O N O m (0 a) (D N CO co C � O ca (n C O e— /) • V W p) co � � i �' co =p 'fir m cn a) co N C L a 0 > O —� 0ca tea) a)� a E �m °a a)� �� �� r� � a_ cn a. Q ) J Q W Q U Q O ;_> 005 p. cl O U M N C:)O Co C � L ca L ,G �+ 0. C co a. O cM N c00 _ 0 ID O co cn L � "O " -0 CD M p) "0 N-0 CD M COO C O O 0 U U U i 0) 4- cn C. 0) 0 0 o> Q C N-0 w to C �O 0 C .0 C C c C 0) ^' L, O O — Q C) C)r- (.0LU •N C � co a M O U > -o 0 O +.+ j = .E +•+ U O d' N LA p O C J p U 0 LA o >. \ 0) E C� cm E C . C L a a) L 7 O C M U N •+'' 0 c_A N� N CD p a) C N C N W C U O 4& a0 +0., 0) c C 0 r- N 4p-+ . C C p a) LUt/> C p o cn C_ +•+ E cn C +j . C N O +O, dS '0 O U ` U U C O C •= O a N O O U +-' a) +0+ '+.� 0 �'' cn N N O' E +O C U c O V N O C +'' N V O "0 C *� C N w U U co X U � C �_ O -C� +� +-' (n _ L (n C- E Q� a) O U .0 p)-0 "0 0)� . 0) p .0 'C j N O N C)> o 0 U N C CD Y O U ~ p U co O O cn •L C p co O p co O C }' � _a) L 4-J O p c� O �. 0) o ' L +•+ co cn C co — O N N C co 0 N N _ D p a) U a �+- 0 = O U `- N O O V U ` j 7 a) M = O V L O U cA U -0 }' U cn +- "0 O\ 41 U U U L co L N C c0 L }' O U \ C >� � +d C co (n �— +J C co }' U U N N •� U C cp O O N C '0 �cn 0 O .U) C •� •cn C a)+- 0--0N a 0--aN a p wUcnM 0 +� \—\ Sao O O L\ OU�N a) O\ OUa) O O OU L a. 0 O +-' L- co OU ca — N O_ N O_ LO O N O \ N O \ N .0 a).cC I� N M O O C 1 1 O L O L N N O r- O O �- O N O CO 'v -0 LO rn M O r• O C clq M c C N O r• O cM O 0 \ O a) L co NCD O N O N co LO it O O �•- O I� O O CO O O O O F— O cfl O It co LL r- � O N LA M CO N am r O cM am O LO LO O co 00 � m CD O N .0 U aj co � C W L O Q O c`o cn +-' ip L cn L- � cn *� N cn L +� cn W +-j \ U Q r- 4-J N m C C a)� Om C +� C C a) O p +�8 _ N 0 cma- 30 Oa) O U CL p . -C QE a a � co E co Q � Q r Ua U acn 1-H a U �w a) � 'fl L.L 0 CD CD N � O j (h O 5 L O C") LO O N0 a) L U cc b.N \ U LO +' r OC va—) C.) .Cl) , ca C 0 E o_ tm� 0 of �E ECY) L c� a) O C U a) •, "C c cn c Q O o a) c O a) p) a) cn LO co N = , O 0-L co U C C C - ca +a -0 0 1- .O U -p O cn C r cn Q � .. U o a�i c0 U +� .0 co — O -O .N Ccc .4CD C cn 0 .� C (0 _ ; a) 0 a)O N a) 0 a) O a)O w �+ N a u 0 OUP a DU a. (n0 CDO N N O a) a) 'O a) O a) C CN N .0 a)E C a)C -0 E -0 -0 E -n E +' O L }' N ' N N O" }' � O� '' � O O a) a) a) N N N a) a) a) .a C 'E C C .E C M O � j O N '� L cn uw i N O i 'p CD O a -p O O O N O NO CN CD .n a) N O O O � 4-1 4-J O 0 00 LO LO LO H 00 O N N � 00 00 (� � W (0 a) O O N 0 M 1� O r- (M N LO m � V} t4 � J a) H a.O a -Op F- O _0_ a) w > O LU 7 O � � � � a ca E -0 2 a) U CD > CD N ca > a) > a) C > J a) 4-1, > +, C O m a 0 :'- o O a O O aCL a) O d LA _ i 2 = E J E ( E 007 POLICE REPORT Inside this issue: January Significant Activity Report December Crime Statistics Summary Explorer Program Report for January School Resource Officer Reports for January Motor Officer Statistics Report for January Target Team Report for January Special points of interest from the Crime Statistic Summary: • The burglary rate for the Year 2001 was 70% higher than the Year 2000 rate. • Robbery statistics reveal a 33% decrease for the Year 2001 when compared to the Year 2000. • LQPD officers arrested 144 drunk drivers during Year 2001, a 60% increase over the Year 2000. • Vehicle theft for the Year 2001 increased 60%when compared to the Year 2000. Dec. 2001-Jan. 2002 DEPARTMENT REPORT NO._L WELCOME LIEUTENANT CRAIG KILDAY Lieutenant Craig Kilday was recently assigned to the Indio Station and will be responsi- ble for the Investigations Bureau, Forensics/Property Section, Training, and the Southern Coachella Valley Community Services District. He will replace Lt. "Doc" Martin who retired in January. During his 24- year career, Lt. Kilday has worked numer- ous assignments throughout the Sheriffs Depart- ment. He started his career in 1978 as a deputy sheriff at the Indio Station working patrol. As an investigator and sergeant, he has worked several specialized assign- ments including narcotics, special enforcement/target teams, Emergency Services Team (SWAT), Search and Rescue Coordinator/Manager, Career Criminal Apprehension Team supervisor, and Investigations, Patrol and Administrative lieutenant. Prior to coming to the Indio Station, Lt. Kilday was assigned to the Ben Clark Training Center as the Training Manager for the Sheriff's Department. Lieutenant Kilday received his Bachelor's Degree in Criminal Justice/Law Enforce- ment and his Master's degree in Management. He is currently an Adjunct Instructor at Riverside Community College. Lt. Kilday and his wife, Nancy, have lived in the Coachella Valley for 24 years. His daughter, Kelly, is a 7t' grade at John Glenn Middle School. GOOD LUCK LIEUTENANT MARTIN Indio Station has said "good-bye" to Lt. Glenn "Doc" Martin. Lt. Martin retired in January after serving 32 years in the Sheriffs Department. He worked a variety of assignments, including Patrol, Corrections, Intelligence, Aviation and Narcotics. He was responsi- ble for building and equipping the Sheriff's Department Aviation Division. Lt. Martin also helped to develop a strong relationship between the Sheriffs Department and the agriculture industry in the Coachella Valley. One of the results of that relationship was the establishment of the Southern Coachella Valley Community Services District Team, which provides special enforcement services to the communities of Thermal, Oasis and Mecca. U. Martin was also an active member in the community, serving as a member of the Lion's Club and participating in several other Coachella Valley organizations. "Doc" (as he prefers to be called), and his wife Jerry, plan on leaving the Coachella Valley and relocating to Modoc County. He plans on hunting and fishing in three different states and returning to the Valley on a regular basis to visit his friends. The Indio Station wishes Lieu- tenant Martin the best of luck with his retirement. December YTD Arrests 0 15 Searches 0 18 Seizures Og 245g Value 0 $171,347 weapons 0 8 Seized r 300 City o, f La Quinta La Quinta Police Department Captain John Horton, Commanding January 2002 highlights (Numbers in parenthesis denotes number of calls for service that day) Tuesday. 01-01-02 (62): None Wednesday. 01-02-02 (52): Jeffrey Schwartz, 37, of La Quinta, arrested for public intoxication and false identification. Gabriel Mata, 37, of La Quinta, arrested for poss. of controlled substance warrant. Traffic signals at Washington St./SR 111 not cycling properly. Signals placed on flash, Cal Trans notified. Cal Trans had re -set signals on Wed. at about 1200 hrs. Thursday, 01-03-02 (58): None Friday. 01.04-02 (35): Karr Zuvela, 31, La Quinta, arrested for DUI. Saturday. 01-05-02 (351: None Sunday. 01-06-02 (38): Jimmy Rivas, 22yrs of Indio, arrested for Auto Theft, and Possession of Illegal Drugs after an investigation. Rivas had taken the company truck after being fired from a tile job in Palm Desert for theft. Palm Desert Station is handling the theft. The drugs were found when he was arrested. Dep. Wedertz. Monday. 01-07-01 Minor Injury Collision in parking lot of Stater Brother's. Car Vs Ped. Dep. Sabo Tuesday. 01-08-02 (46): Mary Casey, 44yrs, of La Quinta, was arrested for DUI on Jefferson N/of 54 during the investigation of a non -injury collision. Dep. White. A 17yr old male was arrested at Wal-Mart for Shoplift and Parole Violation. Dep. Lopez. Wednesday. 01-09-02 (48): None 310 La Quinta Significant Activity Report Thursday. 01-10-02 (51): Page 2 Several vehicle burglaries. Clusters of them in the Rancho La Quinta and Highland Palms areas, also a couple at the top of the cove. Occurred overnight. Many with similar M.O. No real leads yet. Friday. 01-11702 (55): Derek Oakley, 21yrs of Indio, arrested for Possession of a Loaded and Concealed Firearm and for being and Unlicensed Driver during a traffic stop at Miles X Adams. Dep. B.Lee. Mark Mandel, 37yrs of Malibu CA, arrested for a Warrant out of LASO. He was contacted during a vehicle check at 58 X Madison. LOTT Saturday, 01-12-02 (44): Felony Domestic Violence Warrant Arrest at 46-200 Dune Palms. Ernesto Ortiz Barraza ( HM / 29yrs / LQ). Dep. Thomas Sunday, 01-13-01 (42): Juan Miguel Rojo, 123182 of Thermal, arrested for 11350 (a) H&S. During a T-stop at miles and Jefferson. Sharon Leland, of La Quinta, arrested for public intoxication at Carranza X Monterey. Monday. 01-14-02 (42): Nothing significant. Tuesday, 01-15-02 (5 . Burglary to vehicle at the 44000 block of N. Harland Dr. unk suspects broke into victim's vehicle, white 2001 Dodge Ram 2500 truck, and took (3) sets of golf clubs, TVNCR, and misc. music CD's no evidence or witnesses found. Occurred between 2200 on 01/14/02 and 0600 on 01 /15/02_ Wednesday, 0-l-16-02 (43): None Thursday. 01-17-02 (52): Elisa Beltran, 22yrs, arrested for Shoplifting at Wal-Mart. Dep. Aguilasocho_ Friday. 01-18-02 (38): None 311 La Quinta Significant Activity Report Page 3 Saturday, 01-19-02 (52) Psychiatric Evaluation. Dennis Tucker (WM / 33yrs / of La Quinta) was taken to Indio Mental Health as he was making threats to hurt his stepfather. Dep. Thomas Sunday, 01-2M2 (39) Felony Assault Arrest at the 52000 block of Ave. Carranza. Gabriel Donato (HM / 31 yrs / of La Quinta) hit the victim Orlando Garcia (HM / 21yrs) over the head with the barrel of a shotgun because he felt the victim was having an affair with his girlfriend. Garcia sustained a superficial cut to the right side of his head. Donato was booked at Indio Jail. Dep. Leary Monday, 01-21-02 (63): Spousal Battery Arrest at the 52000 block of Ave. Herrera. Roy Rossenrode (WM /27yrs / of La Quinta) booked at Indio Jail. Dep. Kane Shoplift at Walmart. Juvenile (16yrs / of Cathedral City) was arrested for burglary. Dep. Contreras Tuesday, 01-22-02 (49): DUI Non -Injury Collision-54400 Blk Ave. Obregon. John Loerke (WM / 46yrs / of La Quinta) collided into a parked vehicle. He was booked at Indio Jail. Dep. Coleman Wednesday, 01-23-02 (56): Traffic collision on Washington and Sagebrush - PCF running stop sign. Dep.Lee Petty theft occurred at 1100 hrs, at the 78000 block of Cabrillo Way in Rancho La Quinta. VIC. Sonya Alvarez stated unk suspect(s) entered her unlocked vehicle, while at work. Alvarez also related her blk, unk type of purse containing CDL, SS card several credit cards/debit-ATM cards and one book of Wells Fargo blank checks, was stolen from her vehicle. Suspect(s) had also $280.00 in withdrawal transactions at Indio branch (Wells Fargo) negative suspect(s) info. 1 evidence. Dep. Ervin Martin Corrado, 022775, arrested at Stater Bro. for shoplifting. Booked at the jail. Dep.Diaz Willful harm or injury to a child, in -station report, suspect Noe Garcia Sr., 062280, beat two -year - old son Noe Garcia Jr., 020998, around the head area for not finding the telephone. Incident occurred at the 52000 block Ave. Juarez about 1130 hrs. Suspect if currently driving a white Toyota Tundra p/u lic#6R43221 and may be at parents Res. at the 81000 block of Helen St. in Indio. Suspect is currently on bail for puss. of a designated controlled substance, driving under the influence, willful harm or injury to child and for felony committed while released on bail or recognizance charge will be added for committing a felony while on bail. Dep.Wedertz Thursday, 01-24-02_(62) Unattended Death @ the 52000 block of Ave. Martinez. William Fuller (WM / 82yrs / of La Quinta) died of an apparent heart attack. Dep. Eckhardt 31 La Quinta Significant Activity Report Friday,_01-25-02.1631: Page 4 Armed Robbery @ Shell Station 78-998 Hwy 111. Two suspects entered store about 2255hrs, brandished an unknown caliber pistol and took cash from the register along with the wallet of one of the clerks. They hit one of the clerks on the head with an unknown object and were last seen running south from the location. The clerk sustained a bump on the back of his head about the size of a quarter. Saturday,�01-26-02 (41): Theft by Credit Card Arrest @ Wal-Mart. Billy Pennington (WM / 42yrs /of Indio) stole a "fanny pack" from a shopping cart in the parking lot and used a credit card to purchase clothing. Dep. Reynolds Methamphetamine Arrest. Christopher King (38yrs / of Coachella) was arrested for possession of 80.2 Grams of Methamphetamine. He also had $2,228.00 on his person. A follow up search warrant by C.V.N.T.F. at his residence revealed several firearms and about a pound of Methamphetamine. Dep. Reynolds Sunday, 01-27-02 (36): No significant activity Monday. 01-28-02 (45): Shoplifting arrest @ Wal-Mart. Jeri Commings (34yrs / of Cathedral City) was arrested for burglary. Dep. Hughes Tuesday. 01-29-02 (32): Traffic collision @ Ave 50 and Avilla Dr. PCF failure to maintain a straight course of travel. Wednesday, 01-30-02 (701: Salvador Sanchez 01/23/77 of Indio arrested for Federal Parole warrant during a traffic stop Burglary to vehicle @ the 54000 block of Ave abregon occurred between 01/29/02, 1730 and 01/30/02, 0600 hrs., work tools taken Grand theft from open garage at the 79000 block of Paseo Del Ray, power tools taken Grand theft from golf cart at Indian Springs Country Club, golf clubs taken Burglary to vehicle at the 46000 block of Golden Sands, money and mag light taken 3� La Quinta Significant Activity Report Thumday. 01-31-02-(74): Page 5 Robert Garcia 08/10/60 from the 52000 block of Ave Ramirez arrested for terrorist threats after threatening the 909 Code enforcement officer at the 909 City Hall, Garcia was arrested at Vons where he is the manager Vehicle Theft from the 44000 block of Carmen Pl. between 1800 01 /30/02 and 0740 01 /31 /02 Traffic Collision Gay PGA West X Clubhouse, driver failed to apply brakes to gravel truck when parked Jesus Avila Gonzalez 12/04/47 from Mecca arrested for shoplifting at Walmart, took watch band Benito Perez 01/06/56 from Thermal arrested for shoplifting @ Walmart, took socks Attempt Vehicle Theft from the 54000 block of Ave. Rubio at approx. 2230 hrs., victim confronted suspects after hearing truck start "Wehicle was unlocked, windows down; and keys in ignition. Total calls for service: 1403 314 CITY of LA QUI NTA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT January 2002* SCHOOL: LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL Deputy Stephen Morton RSO Grant Funded Position HIGHLIGHTS: • This period of time started during the two -week winter break. • Attended the Coachella Valley Youth Intervention Team meeting. • Attended a countywide School Resource Officer meeting at the Riverside County Office of Education in the city of Riverside. • I sat on the panel of the Child Welfare and Attendance Board, at the Desert Sands Unified School District office. • Along with the District Attorney's Office and the Probation Office, conducted home visits reference truant students. • Conducted follow-up investigations on reported runaway juveniles. • Counseled students that violated school rules, which were not violations of state law, but serious enough to warrant discussing the incident as a preventative measure. Assisted the school staff with several incidents of medical aids, inappropriate behavior and comments made by one student to another. • 1 conducted investigations and documented incidents that occurred on or off campus, to the school bus, which ranged from fights, possible sexual battery and truancy. Actual reporting period covers December 28, 2001 through January 28, 2002. �- CITY of LA QUINTA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT January 2002* SCHOOL: LA QUINTA MIDDLE SCHOOL Deputy: Robert Brooker RSO Grant Funded Position School Session: December 28th, 2001 through January 28th92002. HIGHLIGHTS: • This period of time started during the two -week winter break. • Attended the Coachella Valley Youth Intervention Team meeting. • Attended a countywide School Resource Officer meeting at the Riverside County Office of Education in the city of Riverside. • I sat on the panel of the Child Welfare and Attendance Board, at the Desert Sands Unified School District office. • Along with the District Attorney's Office and the Probation Office, conducted home visits reference truant students. • Conducted follow-up investigations on reported runaway juveniles. • Counseled students that violated school rules, which were not violations of state law, but serious enough to warrant discussing the incident as a preventative measure. • Assisted the school staff with several incidents of medical aids, inappropriate behavior and comments made by one student to another. • I conducted investigations and documented incidents that occurred on or off campus, to the school bus, which ranged from fights, possible sexual battery and truancy. r, 310 Speed Violations Fail to Yield urning Violations top Sign Violations INDIO STATION MOTOR ACTIVITY REPORT PROGRAM STATISTICS JAN UARY 2002 35 Lane Change Violation 0 Seat Belt Violations 3 DUI Arrests 0 Cut Traffic for Citation Prepared By: Deputy Dave Adams 1 Tows 00 Injury T/C 0 0 Non -Injury T/C 01 36 Suspended DL Signal Light Violations 1 3 J Cut Traffic for Collision Q1 Non -Moving 1 0 ild Seat Violations 0 Warnings HIGHLIGHTS 012302 - One felony drug arrest. 12 1 Fatal T/C 1 0 3 1 Riverside County Sheriff's Department La Quinta Target Team Monthly Report January 2002 Deputy Aaron Eller, Deputy James Armstrong and Deputy Matthew Jimenez The following is a summary of the Target Team activities for the month of January. Ongoing Investigations 5 Arrests/ Filings 3 Vehicle checks 15 Business Contacts 12 Investigation assists 20 Arrest Warrants Served 3 Arrest Warrants Attempted 0 Programs 2 Pedestrian Checks 18 Crime Prevention Hours 60 Bar Checks 0 Back-ups 5 Follow-ups 3 Search Warrants 2 310 La Quinta Target Team Report Page 2 Probation Searches 10 Parole Searches 5 Meetings 0 Recovered Stolen Property 0 Citations issued 0 Surveillances 0 Property Checks 14 Civil Commitments 0 Bicycle Time 0 Training Hours 2 Illegal Drugs Seized 0 Total Mileage: 732 miles Noteworthy Accomplishments; • The Target Team along with members of the Palm Desert Station and other agencies conducted parole/probation searches in the 907 area. • The Target Team has begun an updated burglary/theft suppression program to include increased patrols and public information through the use of flyers and public contact. • Additional patrol has also been implemented through the use of bicycles in the area of Washington St. and Hwy 111 to further increase law enforcement visibility. Riverside County Sheriff's Department EXPLORER POST 503 PROGRAM REPORT January 2002 Training meetings were held on January 8, 15, 22, and 29. The training meetings covered the following topics: 1) Indio Juvenile Hall presentation, 2) Competition event training, 3) Bureau of Land Management (B.L.M.) talk, and 4) Report Writing practice. Sarah and Luis Bautista & I coordinated the competition training (except for the tug-of-war practice). Jennifer Richards, Riverside County Sheriffs Department Crime Analyst, handled the tug-of-war training. Explorer Post 503 Captain Andres Martinez led the report writing practice. Deputy Bautista taught the driving under the influence practical exercise. Indio Juvenile Hall employees John Weber and Dyana Swanson did the Juvenile Hall presentation. Supervising B.L.M. Ranger, Mike Meyer, gave the B.L.M. overview. Explorers Andy Martinez, Cindy Cazarez, Trinidad Arredondo, and Moises Castro volunteered as decoys for some of the Riverside County Sheriff/State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Grant Decoy/Shoulder Tap January program days. Martinez, Cazarez, Arredondo, and Castro did excellent jobs as decoys during the program day. Post 503 Explorers/Advisors were presented with certificates of appreciation during the January 71 2002 City of Coachella Council Meeting. To raise funds for future outings, Post 503 Explorers sold Date Festival tickets. Submitted by Explorer Post Advisor Senior Deputy Andy Gerrard 3?0 CITY OF LA QUINTA DECEMBER CRIME COMPARISONS CRIME DECEMBER 2001 DECEMBER 2000 YTD (01) YTD (00) *HOMICIDE 1 2 3 2 *RAPE 1 2 13 SEX CRIMES (FEL) 1 1 9 19 SEX CRIMES (MISD) 1 0 20 14 ROBBERY 1 3 12 18 ASSAULT (FEL) 2 5 93 94 ASSAULT (MISD) 13 14 240 198 BURGLARY 47 41 633 374 *VEHICLE THEFT 16 5 152 95 *THEFT (FEL) 30 24 249 220 THEFT (MISD) 52 55 501--- 384 VANDALISM (MISD) 17 20 291 360 DOM. VIOLENCE 4 13 136 134 NARCOTICS 13 4 128 80 DUI 23 10 144 90 T/C NON -INJURY 60 51 568 497 T/C INJURY 6 3 61 54 T/C FATAL 0 0 4 4 TRAFFIC CITATIONS 269 359 3566 3292 * STATISTICS INCLUDE ATTEMPTS w U J iR V- o 0 0 00 N N U U w w ■ w U') qq Q CN T 0 c W LL w r r -H J 44. n LL 1� VI F w /Oya H.. V U N 32 6 tTL F- CO d 1 F W 2 0 W c) 0 0 C) 0 a Co V) 4 t' cn C%4 �-- iR w / 00 Ci c/ L U� W¥- � k T ; h� ; C •r— r ; t-- ; C0 CD CV r LO 0 LO C x sws 0 w c!a LO Q c U 9 J w 0 x 0 w 0 v S w 0 V) w w 3�- T- 0 o C) 00 C) LLI LU Do 1 0 � � U k C) C C C) C) 0 C (0 00 co It N cu 0 .0 r- o 00 00 N N r 1a M 0) W • r� C.0 ; VJ 0 ao c� r i i i 00 Oo 0 0o 00 0) Nr (0 CD LO CD CNr 't.'"' LO C) CO cr U T- o 0 0 0 0 N N U U w w 0 0 00 C) LO cle) ---$pop C) C) 0 C) � (Y) N 9 CITY OF LA QUINTA DISPATCH INFORMATION / DECEMBER 2001 TYPE OF CALL RESPONSE TIME (MINUTES) NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 0 EMERGENCY 0 ROUTINE 10 878 *STATS TAKEN FROM RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF DATA WAREHOUSE RESPONSE TIME REPORT AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Continued Public Hearing to Certify a Mitigated PUBLIC HEARING: Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-433, General Plan Amendment 2001-082 to Change Certain Standards Relating to Intersection Spacing in the General Plan; Specific Plan 2001-054 Establishing Development Standards and Design Guidelines for the Construction of a 120,700 Square Foot Neighborhood Shopping Center; Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 to Allow a Gasoline Service Station and Car Wash at the Northwest Corner of the Site; and Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 for the Supermarket, Bank, and Drugstore Buildings to be Located at the Southeast Corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street. Applicant: RLF Development RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council Certifying a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-433. 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment 2001-082. 3. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 2001-054. 4. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Conditional Use Permit 2001- 066. 5. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Site Development Permit 2001-71 1. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. 33 G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\BartlettRLF.wpd CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The City Council at its February 5, 2002 meeting continued the proposal at the request of the applicant to this meeting. The project site is located at the southeast corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street and is generally vacant. It is bordered by the All American Canal on the south, Jefferson Street on the west, Avenue 52 on the north, and vacant desert lands designated for Low Density Residential units on the east. The site is designated for Neighborhood Commercial on both the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance maps. Project Request In addition to the Environmental Assessment, the following applications have been filed: 1. A General Plan Amendment to change the City's standards for intersection spacing on Major Arterials. The current standard is 2,600 feet for Major Arterials. The proposed General Plan Amendment would reduce this standard to 1,060 feet for commercial frontage on Major Arterials. 2. A Specific Plan (Attachment 1) to establish development standards and design guidelines for the construction of a neighborhood shopping center, including a supermarket with attached shops on each side, a drug store with drive -through, seven building pads (including drive-throughs at Pads A, D and E, and the Coffee building), and a gasoline service station and car wash. 3. A Conditional Use Permit for the gasoline service station use. 4. A Site Development Permit for the building elevations, site and landscaping plans for the supermarket, drug store and bank (Pad D) buildings (Attachment 2). Separate Site Development Permits will be required for the service station, coffee building, and pads A, B, C, E and F. The Site Development Permit details the architectural style of the supermarket, drug store and bank buildings, and the types of materials which will be utilized. The variations to the City's zoning standards are discussed individually below. 33 rJ G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\Bartlett.wpd Project Description The proposed project would allow up to 120,700 square feet of retail commercial development on the project site. The proposed uses include a supermarket, attached small retail stores, a drugstore with drive -through, bank building with drive -through, gas station and car wash, two fast food restaurant pads with drive-throughs, a coffee store pad with drive -through, and three miscellaneous retail sites (pads B, C and F). The architectural style of the proposed project is generally "Southwestern." The buildings are proposed to be stucco, with flat roofs and large pillars supporting a shaded walkway area. Access is proposed from both Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street. Two access points are proposed on Avenue 52: one at the mid -point of the property line allowing right -in, right -out and left -in movements, and one at the eastern property line allowing right turn movements only. Three access points are proposed on Jefferson Street: the southerly access (next to Pad D) is proposed to be signalized, and provide full turn movements at a signalized intersection, if the General Plan Amendment described above is approved. The center access point, located next to Pad C, will allow right -in, right -out access only. The northerly access point, next to Pad B, will be right -in, right - out only. The landscape plan is limited to Palo Verde, Mesquite and Acacia for trees, and a mix of drought tolerant shrubs and succulents for ground cover. Little turf appears to be proposed. The primary area of concern in the landscaping plan is the retention area, which is proposed to be landscaped only on the perimeter, leaving the slopes and bottom in vacant desert. A condition of approval has been added which requires the redesign of the retention basin landscaping, to include some type of soil stabilization. General Plan Amendment Analysis The current standard within the General Plan Circulation Table is 2,600 feet for Major Arterials. The proposed General Plan Amendment would maintain the residential standard on Major Arterials at 2,600 feet, but reduce this standard to 1,060 feet for commercial frontage on Major Arterials. The standard revision corresponds to that proposed in the Draft General Plan currently under review. In order to analyze this potential change in General Plan standards, an analysis was commissioned'. The analysis found that the proposed change would generally not cause a hazard, although it should not be implemented at the following locations: Letter dated November 30, 2001, John Kain of Urban Crossroads, Inc. 33r' G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\Bartlett.wpd 1. Washington Street from Highway 1 1 1 to Avenue 48. 2. Highway 1 1 1 west of Washington Street. 3. Washington Street from Country Club Drive to 1-10 (this area is now being considered for deletion from the Plan, but was in the original planning area). The analysis found that two issues are critical in assuring that the reductions proposed do not pose a hazard, or affect roadway capacity: 1. The ability of the City Engineer to review individual requests to assure safe operation and intersection requirements; and 2. That traffic signal operations in areas where minimum intersection spacing occurs on Major Arterials be interconnected and optimized, and intersection geometrics be determined based upon City level of service criteria. Assuming these items are implemented, the analysis found that the change in standard would not pose a public health and safety hazard, and would not impact roadway capacity. Further, the change is supported in the existing General Plan in Policy 3-1.1.1, Goal 3-2, Policy 3-2.1.9, Goal 3-3, Policies 3-3.1.1, 3-3.1.2 and 3-3.1.4, which all support the design of an efficient and safe roadway system. The General Plan also clearly allows for ongoing review and revision of standards, as new information becomes available, or conditions change in the City. The General Plan Amendment can therefore be found consistent with the adopted General Plan. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed these applications at its regularly scheduled meeting of December 11, 2001 (Attachment 3). A number of issues were discussed with regards to staff's recommendations. The Planning Commission recommended approval of all applications subject to Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The findings necessary to approve this request can be made, and are included in the attached Resolutions. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council Certifying a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-433; Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment 2001-082; Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 2001-054; 33 4 G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\Bartlett.wpd Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Conditional Use Permit 2001- 066; and Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Site Development Permit 2001-71 1; or 2. Do not adopt the above Resolutions; or 3. Remand the applications to the Planning Commission for further consideration; or 4. Continue the request and provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, fy Herrfian mmunity Development Director A rov d for submiss' by• /1100, Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Specific Plan Document (previously distributed) 2. Elevations for drug and grocery store (previously distributed) 3. Planning Commission Minutes of December 11, 2001 (previously distributed) 33 G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\Bartlett.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-437 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2001-082, SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-066 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-433 APPLICANT: RLF DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 15th day of January, 2002, the 51h day of February, 2002 and 19th day of February, 2002 hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider Environmental Assessment 2001-433 for General Plan Amendment 2001-082, Specific Plan 2001- 054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 and Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 located at the southeast corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 11 th day of December, 2001 hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2001-433 prepared for General Plan Amendment 2001- 082, Specific Plan 2001-054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 and Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 located at the southeast corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street, more particularly described as follows: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 760-290-005 WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study (EA 2001-433) and has determined that although the proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-082, Specific Plan 2001-054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 and Site Development Permit 2001 -711 could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because appropriate mitigation measures were made a part of the assessment and included in the Conditions of Approval for General Plan Amendment 2001-082, Specific Plan 2001-054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 and Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed, and, G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettEA.WPD 330 U t; 0 City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-433 RLF Development Adopted: February 19, 2002 WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify certification of said Environmental Assessment: 1 . The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-082, Specific Plan 2001-054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 and Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2001-433. 2. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-082, Specific Plan 2001-0541 Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 and Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 4. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-082, Specific Plan 2001-054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 and Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 do not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. 5. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-082, Specific Plan 2001-054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 and Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. 6. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2001-082, Specific Plan 2001-054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 and Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 3 �+ Oe7 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettEA.WPD City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-433 RLF Development Adopted: February 19, 2002 7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 8. The Planning Commission has considered the Environmental Assessment 2001- 433 and the Environmental Assessment reflects the independent judgement of the City. 9. The City has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 10. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby certify Environmental Assessment 2001-433 for the reasons set forth in the Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum on file in the Community Development Department. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 19th day of February 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor 3 3' u City of La Quinta, California G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettEA.WPD City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-433 RLF Development Adopted: February 19, 2002 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 331 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettEA.WPD Environmental Checklist Form Planning Commission Resolution 2001-150 City Council Resolution 2002- 1 . Project Title: General Plan Amendment 2001-082, Specific Plan 2001- 054, Conditional Use Permit 2001-066, Site Development Permit 2001-71 1. Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center. 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Christine di lorio, 760-777-7125 4. Project Location: Southeast corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: RLF Development 77043 Iroquois Drive Indian Wells, CA 92210 6. General Plan Designation: Neighborhood Commercial 7. Zoning: Neighborhood Commercial 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) General Plan Amendment to shorten the distance between signalized intersections on Major. Specific Plan to establish development standards and design guidelines for the construction of a neighborhood shopping center on 15.15 acres, including supermarket, drug store and seven ancillary pads. Conditional Use Permit for the location of a service station at the northwest corner of the property. Site Development Permit for the development plans of the supermarket, drug store and bank building. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings. North: Avenue 52, Low Density Residential South: All -American Canal, Low Density Residential West: Jefferson Street, Low Density Residential East: Low Density Residential 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) �f Not applicable Lf G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletEACkIst.WPD Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project; involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Hazards and Hazardous Public Services Materials Agriculture Resources Hydrology and Water Quality Recreation Air Quality Land Use Planning Transportation/Traffic Biological Resources Mineral Resources Utilities and Service Systems Cultural Resources Noise Lj Mandatory Findings Geology and Soils Population and Housing Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared F] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (n'''� L� I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Date 3 4 _-1 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: ull. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletFACkIst.WPD Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply toprojects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A No Impacty answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analysis are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The analysis of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletEACkIst.WPD 34 0 1 ? 3 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: I. AESTHETICS: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (General Plan Exhibit CIR-5) b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (General Plan EIR, page 5-12 ff.) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials) IL AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES:. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Dept. Of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29, 5-32) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (Aerial photographs) III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Project Description) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Project Description) Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact X X X X X " GI_ X X 91 K/ ., G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletEACkIst.WPD 4 u13 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment, Exhibit 5-1) b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) c) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) Either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (La Quinta Municipal Code; General Plan) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-5) V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? ("Cultural Resources Assessment of a 15 acre Parcel...," Archaeological Associates, July 2001) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resources (i.e., an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? ("Cultural Resources Assessment of a 15 acre Parcel...," Archaeological Associates, July 2001) c) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? (Lakebed Delineation Map) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ("Cultural Resources Assessment of a 15 acre Parcel...," Archaeological Associates, July 2001) VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: X X X X X X X X G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletEACkIst.WPD i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.2-3, page 4-35) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6-2, page 6-7) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6-2, page 6-7) iv) Landslides? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6-2, page 6-7) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6-2, page 6-7) c) Be located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on - or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? ("Geotechnical Investigation Proposed 7 Lot Residential Subdivision...," Sladden Engineering, August 2001) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (I 994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-32) VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Application Materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Application Materials) c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Application Materials) d) Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Riverside County Hazardous Materials Listing) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip; would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 6-11) X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletEACkIst.WPD h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildlands fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) X VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-26, 6-27) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (General Plan EIR, page 4-57 ff.) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off - site? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems to control? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) f) Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-13) g) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-13) IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Specific Plan Project Description) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purposes of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Master Environmental Assessment 2-11) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5- 5) X. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29) X X X X X X X KI /:1 X 4 v X G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletEACkIst.WPD co 10" XI. NOISE: Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6- 4, page 6-17) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6- 4, page 6-17) c) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan MEA, Exhibit 6-4, page 6-17) d) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Master Environmental Assessment) e) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive levels? (General Plan map) XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (General Plan, page 2-14) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff. ) Police protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff. ) Schools? (General Plan MEA, page 4-9 ff. ) Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA, page 4-14 ff. ) X X X KI 1!t X X X X X X 34 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletEACkIst.WPD 8 XIV. RECREATION: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application Materials) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application Materials) XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff.) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff.) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff.) d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff.) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Application Materials) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Application Materials) g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Application Materials) XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24 b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24 ) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, page 4-27) d) Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, page 4-20) e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, page 4-20) K/ X X X X X X X X X X X X J G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletEACkIst.WPD f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (General Plan MEA, page 4-28) XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVIII EARLIER Analysis. X X X X Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. No earlier analysis were used in this review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. See attached Addendum. SOURCES: Master Environmental Assessment, City of La Quinta General Plan 1992. SCAQMD CEQA Handbook. General Plan, City of La Quinta, 1992. City of La Quinta Municipal Code Cultural Resources Assessment of a 15 Acre Parcel Located Southeast of the Intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 52...,�`� rj Archaeological Associates, July 2001. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartletEACkIst.WPD 10 Addendum for Environmental Assessment 2001-433 Planning Commission Resolution 2001-149 City Council Resolution 2002-, III. a) The proposed project will generate air pollution primarily from the operation of motor vehicles. The 120,700 square feet of commercial development could generate approximately 5,180 trips per day'. Based on this trip generation, the project at buildout will generate the following pollutants. Running Exhaust Emissions (pounds/day) PM10 PM10 PM10 CO ROC NOx Exhaust Brakes Tires 50 mph 133.79 5.15 27.44 -- 0.57 0.57 Daily Threshold* 550 75 100 150 Based on 5,180 trips/day and average trip length of 5 miles, using EMFAC7G Model provided by California Air Resources Board. Assumes catalytic light autos at 75 F. * Operational thresholds provided by SCAQMD for assistance in determining the significance of a project and the need for an EIR. As demonstrated in the Table above, the proposed project will not exceed any threshold for the generation of moving emissions, as established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District in determining the need for an EIR. The impacts to air quality relating to chemical pollution are not expected to be significant. III. c) The Coachella Valley is anon -attainment area for PM10 (particulate matter of 10 microns or smaller). The construction of the proposed project has the potential to generate dust, which could contribute to the PM 10 problem in the area. In order to control PM 10, the City has imposed standards and requirements on development to control dust. The applicant will be required to submit such a plan prior to initiation of any earth moving activity at the site. In addition, the potential impacts associated with PM 10 can be mitigated by the mitigation measures below. 1. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. 2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation. Institute of Transportation Engineers, "Trip Generation, 6th Edition." Rate calculated for shopping centers, at 42.92 trips per day. 2 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartlettAdd.WPD 3. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. Cut and fill quantities will be balanced on site. 5. Any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. 6. Watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on- going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. 7. All disturbed areas shall be treated to prevent erosion until the site is constructed upon. Pad sites which are to remain undeveloped shall be seeded with either a desert wildflower mix or grass seed, or chemical stabilizer. 8. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. Perimeter landscaping on Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street, and the retention basin landscaping shall be completed with the first phase of development. 9. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean up of construction -related dirt on approach routes to the site. 10. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. 11 All buildings on the project site shall conform to energy use guidelines in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, the impacts to air quality from buildout will not be significant. V. b) A cultural resource survey was conducted for the subject property. The assessment found no surficial deposits, but identified the area as a high wind zone which can regularly cover or uncover artifacts. As a result, the report recommends the imposition of the following mitigation measure: 1. A qualified archaeological monitor shall be present during all earth moving and grading activities. The monitor shall be empowered to stop or redirect activities on the site should a resource be identified. A final report shall be filed with the Community Development Department prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any building on the project site. 35-1 " Cultural Resources Assessment of 15 Acre Property...,"" Archaeological Associates, July 2001. - u 21. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartlettAdd.WPD 2 VI. a) i) & ii) The proposed project lies in a Zone III groundshaking zone. The property, as with the rest of the City, will be subject to significant ground movement in the event of a major earthquake. Structures on the site will be required to meet the City's standards for construction, which include Uniform Building Code requirements for seismic zones. The City Engineer will require the preparation of site -specific geotechnical analysis in conjunction with the submittal of grading plans (please see below). This requirement will ensure that impacts from ground shaking are reduced to a less than significant level. VI. b) The subject property is subject to soil erosion due to wind. The City will implement requirements for a PM 10 management plan, and additional mitigation measures have been included in the Air Quality discussion above. These mitigation measures will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. VIII. b) Domestic water is provided by the Coachella Valley Water District, which extracts groundwater from a number of wells in the Lower Thermal sub -basin. The development of the project site will require some domestic water, although as a commercial development the use of water on the site will be much less than residential development. The project proponent will be required to implement the City's standards for water conserving plumbing fixtures and on -site retention, which both aid in reducing the potential impacts associated with groundwater. The proposed project will also meet the requirements of the City's water - conserving landscaping ordinance. These standards will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. VIII. c)-d) The City requires that all construction projects retain the 100 year 24 hour storm on -site. This will control the amount of runoff which exits the site during a storm. The project's drainage plan will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of grading permits. The Specific Plan includes a provision for the use of the site's retention basin as a plant nursery. This use will significantly reduce the capacity of the retention basin, will potentially negate the standards imposed by the City, and could pose a significant hazard to adjoining property in the event of a flooding hazard. In order to mitigate this impact, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1. The retention basin shall be used for passive open space only, and shall not be utilized as a plant nursery at any time. XI. a) The current noise environment at the project site ranges from 50 to 60 dBA CNEL, with higher levels in areas close to both Avenue 52 and Jefferson. The proposed project will not be a sensitive receptor, but will be located next to future sensitive receptors to the east. The proposed project will generate noise from compactors, trash enclosures and other stationary sources, in addition to the traffic noise which will occur on -site. The proposed site plan,. shows that the loading docks, compactors and trash enclosures will be located closest to the residential lands to the east. This potentially could impact residential units to the east in th6 2 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartlettAdd.WPD 3 future. Therefore, the following mitigation measures will be implemented: 1. An 8 foot wall shall be constructed along the entire length on the eastern property line. The wall shall be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permits for any building on the site. 2. All deliveries occurring on the east side of the proposed market and Shops A and B shall occur between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m., Monday through Saturday. No deliveries shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. No loudspeaker system (such as those operated for drive -through windows) shall be permitted at Pad F. 4. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent shall submit to the Community Development Department for review and approval, a noise analysis which demonstrates that the noise levels east of the property line shall meet City standards after construction of the supermarket building, Shops A and B, and Pad F. XI. c) Noise levels will also be affected by construction activities on the site. Should the residential development be occupied prior to, or during the construction of the shopping center, the residents could be adversely impacted by construction noise. In order to mitigate these impacts, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: XIII. a) 1. All internal combustion equipment operating within 500 feet of any occupied residential unit shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers. 2. All stationary construction equipment (e.g. generators and compressors) shall be located as far as practical from adjacent, occupied residential units. 3. Construction activities shall be limited to the hours prescribed in the La Quinta Municipal Code. These mitigation measures will reduce the potential impacts associated with noise at the subject property to a less than significant level. The proposed development will have a direct impact on public services and will be served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, acting under City contract. Site development will generate property tax and sales taxes which will offset the costs of added police and fire services. The project area will be required to pay the mandated school fees as development occurs. These fees mitigate the students generated, and offset the impacts to schools. 35 The collection of property tax, and the generation of sales tax will generate revenues to the City to offset the added costs associated with the provision of municipal services. The project 023 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartlettAdd.WPD 4 XV. a) XV. d) will be required to participate in the City's Impact Fee Program, which helps to offset roadway improvement costs. Site development is not expected to have a significant impact on municipal services or facilities. The proposed project site is designated for neighborhood commercial development, and as such was analysed in the City's General Plan EIR. The potential impacts associated with traffic generation from the site have been addressed in that document, and incorporated into the City's roadway standards, which the proposed project will be required to implement. The City has also initiated an Impact Fee Program, designed to offset improvement costs on City roadways. The project will be required to participate in this program. These requirements will serve to reduce the potential impacts associated with traffic generation at the site to a less than significant level. The proposed project includes the amendment of the City's General Plan to reduce the separation required on Major Arterials for intersection spacing. The current standard is 2,600 feet for Major Arterials. The proposed General Plan Amendment would reduce this standard to 1,060 feet for commercial frontage on Major Arterials. In order to analyze this potential change in General Plan standards, an analysis was commissioned'. The analysis found that the proposed change would not cause a hazard at the project location, although it should not be implemented along certain segments of Washington Street, and on Highway 111 west of Washington Street. At the project site, the standard is determined to be safe, assuming the following mitigation measure is implemented: 1. Traffic signal operations in areas where minimum intersection spacing occurs on Major and Primary Arterials shall be interconnected and optimized, and intersection geometrics shall be determined based upon City level of service criteria. The implementation of this mitigation measure at the project site will reduce potential impacts associated with design features to a less than significant level. 3 5 Letter dated November 30, 2001, John Kain of Urban Crossroads, Inc. 024 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartlettAdd.WPD 5 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CHANGE TO CERTAIN STANDARDS IN THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN RELATING TO MINIMUM INTERSECTION SPACING ON MAJOR ARTERIALS CASE NO.: GPA 2001-082 APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 15th of January 2002, 5th day of February, 2002, and 19th day of February, 2002, hold duly noticed Public Hearings for review of a General Plan Amendment to change the minimum intersection spacing on Major Arterials for commercial frontage to 1,060 feet; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 1 1 th day of December, 2001, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for review of a General Plan Amendment, and recommended approval under Resolution 2001- 151; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings approving said General Plan Amendment: 1. Internal General Plan Consistency. The proposed amendment to the Land Use Map would change certain standards for Major Arterials as regards minimum intersection spacing. The proposed amendment was analyzed by a professional traffic engineer, and was determined to be a logical change in General Plan standards. The on -going review of standards in the Circulation Element is supported by the General Plan, as changing conditions warrant. 2. Public Welfare. The proposed amendment will not negatively impact public safety, insofar as the traffic engineer determined that the change will not affect roadway capacity. 3. General Plan Compatibility. The proposed General Plan Amendment will be compatible with the other standards of the Circulation Element, and provides the City with greater flexibility in developing a safe, comprehensive circulation system. c�� 4. Property Suitability. The proposed Amendment is City-wide. The City' `� ,_ U 2 a G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettGPA.WPD City Council Resolution 2002-_ General Plan Amendment 2001-082 City of La Quinta Adopted: February 19, 2002 roadway system and functional classification system support the change. 5. Change in Circumstances. The continued development of the City requires the continued analysis of the best methods to build out a safe and efficient roadway system, and this Amendment continues to support that development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case. 2. That it does hereby require compliance with those mitigation measures required in Environmental Assessment 2001-433. 3. That it does approve General Plan Amendment 2001-082 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on the 19th day of February 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk rN City of La Quinta, California 3 620 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettGPA.WPD City Council Resolution 2002-_ General Plan Amendment 2001-082 City of La Quinta Adopted: February 19, 2002 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 35 u27 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettGPA.WPD Q z Q U) z N (D W U � W QJ Q I— Q I..L F-- z_ d J N 00 IO CN O NO O O O N 4 N C c Q) o E m C O ca co ccQ c L C O U ca d LL � CL -J -p U - oCD }' >c > o UC7UQ O E x ca O O O cM E 7 x ca O O c'M O LSD cl O O O cli LO N N O O N r- ca c i LO N LO LO N N a. a) 2 O M m Y O .O U CO c cu O > a� CD a a M O C O 00 00 O cn "O y M M N +-/ +-; 7 1 y- �+- La N CO ca C'M CM CC 4- O z O C `t >• ca +j v N 'a O O > O � N M 4. O %�- z O c LO > ca }, U ° O ' Q LO O > M it O O 2 (Da� c C 2 CL O — s +•� �' ca +•� Y- O � U_ m O O O "o y co •a 2 LA a� > co H Q co 0- c O E >• O O `} Qi M N CL 4 +r - 00 � N O O N c-C N y .O O m cn 4- O 00 cs�U0 CO) N - ca N 4- 7 O) +� O C N m O O ca 'U 4' > C;) N co Oc O CL O E � ° C >-0 +j 0) 2 o ° co �, y O U) �- (0 o O O O oOC U 4- °) ° a rn 00 o CO V N � '� .` ca co 00 e- N �% �O 2) � j > j N LL co .S ca O Cl) O rn ca O E w = 7 c C Q N > CL cn E 0 >, fa U U C (m O CMU E c Q) Q) a co C co cm U O H H Q CL > O U - c o O c C U N +O ca O U � � E U U v E 7 a 'a c C O U c 7 O CU C Q) Q ca Q) � L 'C +� U +-+ C ca p) c y ° c O C t O c O U C U 'D y_ Q) ca U t O ++ 0)O 'CD 'U N � Y OO. +' C Ecv -° a ca +moo° C — L L N L E O L) y 00 Q U N O 4- - N N O Li) '? y 7 O 4 y Q) ° E c o E O a Co 7 E a E c E c ° •c E x O E Q m U Co a) .c O +r > 4- O cn O 0 E � co N C 7 N '0 O y C N '+� N ca U c .0 -;,- cn x O ca , 0 N = U E 0 co E'en ca (D +1 > Q) •� Ha a.., c O(n.c0(nD CD 3CD � Z N M_ v`2 8 0 C. Q a O �a 00 U U_ Q O U 0 a� U U N U O 0 a a� . O "0 c c - W 0O >4. aV (D -0 t o N — o a 3 00 N Q O I� CO > a O O N :3 O ` CL O O t CO m c N +r � U o E O co a O 7 c cnE CD co j �.; Q c ` O cc U 0 — c d 0 m O U O cn O _J V U 0 n � 3 > c > O UC7UQ 35J " �� v23 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR A NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AVENUE 52 AND JEFFERSON STREET CASE NO.: SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 APPLICANT: RLF DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 15th day of January, 2002, 5th day of February, 2002, and 19th day of February, 2002 hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider the request of RLF Development for review of a Specific Plan to allow the development of a neighborhood commercial shopping center on 15 acres at the southeast corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street, and more particularly described as: Assessor's Parcel Number: 760-290-005 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 1 1 th day of December, 2001, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for Specific Plan 2001-054, and recommended approval under Resolutions 2001-?; and WHEREAS, the project has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended, Resolution 83-63, in that the Community Development Director has conducted an Initial Study (Environmental Assessment 2001-433) and determined that the proposed project could have an adverse impact on the environment. However, there would not be a significant effect in this case, because appropriate mitigation measures were made a part of the Conditions of Approval for Specific Plan 2001-054, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact will be filed; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings of approval for said Specific Plan 2001-054: Finding Number 1 - Consistency with General Plan/Zoning Code 1. That the proposed Specific Plan 2001-054 is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan in that the parcel has been designated for Neighborhood Commercial on the Land Use Map. 36't 0G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSP01-054.wpd 0 ; City Council Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 2001-054 - RLF Development Adopted: February 19, 2002 2. The proposed Specific Plan is compatible with the City's zoning ordinance in that it provides standards for the proposed land uses, and implements requirements for Conditional Use Permits, as stipulated. Finding Number 2 - Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act 1. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared by the Community Development Department as required by the California Environmental Quality Act statutes. The assessment concludes that the project will not significantly affect the environment, provided Mitigation Monitoring is completed (EA 2001-433). Finding Number 3 - Site Design 1. The project, as conditioned, is compatible with the City's standards and existing surrounding development. Conditions of approval have been included to ensure compliance with the City's standards. Findina Number 4 - Site Improvements 1. The extension of all public services, as required, will provide for the logical expansion of services in the City. 2. All improvements within and adjacent to the proposed project will be constructed to meet City standards and be compatible with surrounding development. 3. The Specific Plan, as conditioned, will not pose a hazard to the public health, welfare or safety. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case. 2. That it does hereby require compliance with those mitigation measures required in EA 2001-433. 3. That it does approve Specific Plan 2001-054 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. 3161 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSP01-054.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 2001-054 - RLF Development Adopted: February 19, 2002 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on the 19th of February, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California ., 6 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSP01-054.wpd CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 FEBRUARY 19, 2002 1. Upon the City Council's conditional approval of this Specific Plan, the City Clerk shall prepare and record with the Riverside County Recorder, a memorandum noting that the conditions of approval for the development of this property exist and are available for review at the City Hall. 2. The developer agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Specific Plan. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the developer of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary permits and/or clearances from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting the improvement plans for City approval. 4. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. & 13.24.170, La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Quality Resources Control Board's ("SWQRCB") Order No. 99-08- DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs five (5) acres or more of land, or that disturbs less than , five (5) acres of land, but which is a part of a construction project that I l G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 1 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 encompasses more than five (5) acres of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this Specific Plan. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020, LQMC): 1 . Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2. Temporary Sediment Control. 3. Wind Erosion Control. 4. Tracking Control. 5. Non -Storm Water Management. 6. Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All of applicant's erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off site grading being done in relation to this project. F. All approved project BMPs shall be maintained in their proper working order throughout the course of construction, and until all improvements have been accepted by the City. 5. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). PROPERTY RIGHTS 6. Prior to the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire, or confer, those easements, and other property rights necessary for the construction and/or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services, and for the maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 3 E� G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 2 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 7. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 8. Unless the ultimate developed right-of-way can be documented, the public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) - 120-foot ultimate developed right-of-way. 2. Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial) - 1 10-foot ultimate developed right- of-way. 9. Right-of-way geometry for property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawing #805, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 10. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 11. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public right- of-ways as follows: A. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) - 20-foot from the ROW-P/L. B. Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial) - 20-foot from the ROW-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Parcel Map. 7 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 12. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas shown on the Site Development Plan. 13. The applicant shall vacate all abutter's right -of -access to public streets and properties from all frontages along such public streets and properties, excepting those access points shown on the Site Development Plan. 14. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, ingress/egress, or other encroachments will occur. 15. Before the applicant may be permitted to vacate, or abandonment, any existing right-of-way, or access easement, which will diminish the access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall submit a proposed alternate right-of-way or access easement to those properties, or shall submit notarized letters of consent from all affected property owners; the final approval of which rests with the City. 16. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of this Specific Plan and the date of final acceptance of the on and off -site improvements for this Specific Plan, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these conditions of approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 17. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. 3 6 `0, 0-% L,.JO G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 4 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 A. Off -Site Street Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical The street improvement plans shall include permanent traffic control and separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming, design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. B. Off -Site Street Median Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' C. Perimeter Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' D. On -Site Site Development Plan: 1 it = 40' Horizontal E. On -Site Utility Plan: 1 " = 20' Horizontal F. On -Site Landscape Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal G. On -Site Lighting Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. "Site Development" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements; and show the existing street improvements out to at least the center line of the street adjacent to the site. "Site Utility" plans shall normally include all sub -surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to sewer lines, water lines, fire protection and storm drainage systems. "Rough Grading" plans shall include perimeter wallt with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. 18. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040, LQMC. 19. The City maintains standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City resolution, the �-� ap plicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes from the City. v 1 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 5 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 20. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all complete, approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format which can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 21. Prior to the conditional approval of this Specific Plan, or the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 22. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Specific Plan, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28, LQMC. 23. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monuments. 24. When improvements are to be secured through a SIA, and prior to any permits being issued by the City, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on and off -site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution, or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit cost y g �., the City Engineer. � 6 shall be approved by G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 6 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 At the same time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for the security determination of the SIA, the applicant shall also submit one copy of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " reduction of each page of the Parcel Map, along with one copy of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " Vicinity Map. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates for its own on and off -site improvements. Cost estimates for the security of telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements will not be required. Development -wide improvements shall not be agendized for final acceptance by the City Council until the City has received confirmation from the telephone authority that the applicant has met all the requirements for telephone service to all proposed buildings shown on the Site Development Plan. 25. When improvements are phased through an administrative approval (e.g., Phasing Plan, Site Development Permits, etc.), all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the occupancy of any permanent buildings in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The same submittal criteria shall apply to all subsequent phases as required for the first phase submittal. (E.g. detailed cost estimates, 8-1/2 11 x 11 " reductions, etc.) 26. In the event the applicant fails to construct improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, or other phasing method, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 3 (, G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 7 11 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 GRADING 27. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 28. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 29. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, and C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on any final map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions submitted with its application for a grading permit. 30. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 31. The applicant shall minimize differences in elevation between the adjoining properties. DRAINAGE 32. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), LQMC, Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03 and the following: l 1 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 8 u 4 D CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 A. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water may be disposed of in a trickling sand filter and leach field approved by the City Engineer. The sand filter and leach field shall be designed to contain surges of up to 3 GP/1,000 sq. ft. of landscape area, and infiltrate 5 g.p.d./1,000 sq. ft. Or nuisance water may be diverted to the landscaped areas. B. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. C. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. D. Pursuant to Section 13.24.120 (D), LQMC, the On -Site retention basin shall be sized to not only accommodate the on -site storm runoff, but also the tributary runoff from the adjacent streets. UTILITIES 33. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.1 10 (Utilities), LQMC. 34. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 35. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 36. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. 3 7 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 9 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 37. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Off -Site Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Properties), LQMC. 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit a Transportation Demand Management (T.M.) Plan in accordance with the City's T.M. Ordinance, Chapter 9.180, LQMC. The applicant shall be responsible for improvements found necessary to mitigate the traffic impacts of this development. 39. Pursuant to Section 9.150.080(A)(8)(b), LQMC, the applicant shall provide 90- foot uninterrupted driveway throats into the parking lot, or alternatively provide a combination of a dedicated right turn deceleration lane and the drive throat that will equal a total of 90-feet. 40. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC, adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, and as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 41. Standard corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #805, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 42. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations which convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue for street sweeping. 43. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial; 1 10' R/W option): Widen south side of street along all frontage adjacent to the .. Specific Plan boundary. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing 3 f `~ roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 10 6 4 2 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. Other significant new improvements required for installation in, or adjacent, to the subject right of way include: (a) 6-foot wide meandering sidewalk (b) 18-foot wide landscaped median from the roundabout to the east boundary of the Specific Plan The pavement rehabilitation/reconstruction, and landscape median improvements, are eligible for reimbursement from the City's Development Impact Fee fund in accordance with policies established for that program. 2) Jefferson Street (a) Applicant shall construct median openings and turn pockets to accommodate the turning movements authorized by these conditions of approval. (b) Applicant shall install a traffic signal at the project's main entry, located 1 130 ± feet south of Avenue 52 centerline, when warrants are met. Applicant is responsible for 50% of cost to design and install traffic signal if complementing cost share from development on other side of street is available at time signal is required. Applicant shall enter into an improvement agreement and post security for 50% of the cost to design and construct the traffic signal prior to issuance of an onsite grading permit; the security shall remain in effect until the signal is constructed by the applicant or the developer on the other side of the street. If the land on the other side of the street does not have an approved project connecting to the subject intersection, Applicant shall pay 100% of cost to design and install a signal at the resulting "T" intersection. If, however, the Applicant's development trails the progress of the development on the other side of the street and the other development is connecting to the subject intersection, the Applicant is responsible for 50% of the cost as previously stated in this condition. �1r) 310 A3 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 11 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 44. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential & Parking Areas 3.0" A.C./4.50" A.B. Collector 4.011/5.00" Secondary Arterial 4.011/6.00" Primary Arterial 4.5 "/6.00" Major Arterial 5.5 "/6.50" or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. A. PARKING LOTS 1) The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 45. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Primary Entry (Jefferson Street, 1 130 ± feet S. of the C/L Intersection with Avenue 52): Full turn movement. B. Secondary Entry (Jefferson Street, 810 ± feet S. of the C/L Intersection with Avenue 52): Right turn in, Right turn out. C. Secondary Entry (Jefferson Street, 490 ± feet S. of the C/L Intersection with Avenue 52): Right turn in, Right turn out, Left turn in. D. Primary Entry (Avenue 52, 375 ± feet E. of the C/L Intersection with Jefferson Street): Left & Right turn in, Right turn out. E. Secondary Entry (Avenue 52, 635 ± feet E. of the C/L Intersection with Jefferson Street): Right turn in, Right turn out. 3t A4 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 12 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 This Secondary Entry shall be a shared access drive/road with the adjacent landowner and be centered on the easterly property line. The shared access drive/road layout shall be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In the event the adjacent landowner desires a security gate serving its property, the gate shall be located away from the property line sufficient distance with the following access road design features occurring on the adjacent landowners property: adequate stacking, a rejection turnaround feature, and a separate lane for guests. In the event the adjacent landowner does not reasonably cooperate with the applicant in assisting with the shared access drive/road requirement, the City may allow the applicant to implement an alternative design concept satisfactory to the City Engineer, including but not limited to, elimination of the shared access requirement. Nothing in this condition requires the adjacent landowner to pay for sufficient improvements to implement the shared access requirement in a manner that serves the development proposed by Specific Plan 01-054. However, reasonable cooperation by the adjacent landowner does include granting of reciprocal cross -access easements between the two landowners that facilitate construction of improvements necessary to implement the shared access concept on both properties in a manner that precludes unnecessary reconstruction of the improvements in the future. 46. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 47. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 48. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements. CONSTRUCTION 49. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include 3 t,45 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 13 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 50. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - .maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential tracts are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the tract or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPING 51. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscape Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC. 52. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. 53. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit plans for approval by the Community Development Department prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking is complete, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner prior to submitting for signature by the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 54. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 18 inches of curbs long public streets. 55. Although storm water retention in landscape setbacks ar e v G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 14 4 0 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 landscape areas. However, under the Subdivision and Regulations Section 13.24.130, ¶ 1, 3rd sentence, Ir]etention basins" are permitted to be located within the Landscape Setbacks if approved by the City. PUBLIC SERVICES 56. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by Sunline Transit and approved by the City Engineer. QUALITY ASSURANCE 57. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 58. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such ofi other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 59. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. After tributary -area improvements are complete and soils have been permanently stabilized where retention basins have been constructed, testing shall include sand filter percolation tests, as approved by the City Engineer. 60. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all public improvement plans which were signed by the City Engineer. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City to reflect the as -built conditions. MAINTENANCE 61. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. ' �-4, 11 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 15 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 62. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. FEES AND DEPOSITS 63. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. FIRE DEPARTMENT: 64. Approved super fire hydrants shall be located not less than 25 feet nor more than 165 feet from any portion of the buildings as measured along vehicular travel ways. 65. Blue dot reflectors shall be placed in the street 8-inches from centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 66. Minimum fire flow 2500 GPM for a two hour duration. Fire flow is based on type VN construction and a complete fire sprinkler system. 67. Building plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for plan review to run concurrent with the City plan check. 68. All commercial buildings 5,000 square feet or larger shall be fully sprinkled. NFPA 23 Standard. Sprinkler plans will need to be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. 69. Provide primary and secondary access for emergency vehicles. 70. An operation that produces grease -laden vapors will require a Hood/duct system for fire protection. 71. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. 72. The applicant or developer, shall prepare and submit to the fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 16 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 73. Install a KNOX key box on each commercial building. (Contact the Fire Department for an application.) 74. Install portable fire extinguishers as required by the California Fire Code. 75. Approved super fire hydrants shall be located not less than 25 feet nor more than 165 feet from any portion of the buildings as measured along vehicular travel ways. GENERAL: 76. All changes to the Specific Plan which are also included in the Site Development Permit shall be made to the latter to ensure consistency. The project proponent shall submit amended documents within 30 days of City Council approval of the Specific Plan or prior to issuance of a grading plan, whichever occurs first. 77. The landscaping plan shall include all frontages on City streets, and shall be installed as part of the first phase of construction on the project site. 78. Page 6 of the Specific Plan shall be amended to reflect the turning movements allowed by the City Engineer on both Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street. 79. The second paragraph of section 2.2 "Land Use Summary" shall be deleted, and replaced with the following sentence. "Land uses permitted within this Specific Plan are those uses allowed in the Neighborhood Commercial district in the Development Code." 80. Page 7 of the Specific Plan shall be amended to delete the asterisk allowing drive -through facilities at the gasoline service station. Drive-throughs shall be prohibited at the gasoline service station. 81. The last sentence on page 9 shall be deleted. 82. In section 4.3, Landscape Areas, Section 8.3 Retention, and Section 12.0, Adaptability, text and exhibits shall be modified to show a redesigned retention basin landscaping to include landscaping on the slopes and bottom of sufficient size and density to stabilize soils. The text shall eliminate all references to an additional building pad within the retention basin. t 4� G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 17 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 - RLF Development ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 83. The project site plan (and all exhibits which use the site plan as a base map) shall be redesigned to provide trash enclosures adjacent to the building which they serve. The new site plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to submittal of the final document after City Council approval. 84. No signage is approved as part of this approval. The project proponent shall submit a master signage program for Planning Commission review and approval. 85. All references to golf cart circulation shall be removed from the Specific Plan, including both text and exhibits. The text in section 6 shall be replaced with the following statement: "The project shall incorporate a golf cart circulation system, should such a system be adopted by the City in the future." 86. Section 6.4, Handicapped Accessibility, shall be amended to state that the project will meet City standards relating to ADA. 87. Section 7.3, Parking Lot Lighting shall be amended to include the following sentence: "All lighting, including security lighting, on the project site shall conform to City standards. A lighting plan shall be approved by the Community Development Department prior to issuance of building permits." 88. The last two sentences of the paragraph under section 8.3, Retention, shall be deleted. 89. The last sentence of section 1 1.2, Parcel Plan, shall be deleted. 90. The last paragraph of Section 12.0, Adaptability, shall be deleted. 91. All mitigation measures associated with Environmental Assessment 2001-433 are hereby incorporated into this Specific Plan. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CBartlettSPCOA.wpd 18 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A GASOLINE SERVICE STATION AND CAR WASH WITHIN A NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER CASE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-066 APPLICANT: RLF DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 15th. day of January, 2002, 5th day of February, 2002, and 19th day of February, 2002 hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider the request of RLF Development to allow a gasoline service station within a planned commercial center; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did on the 11 th day of December 2001, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of RLF Development to allow a gasoline service station within a planned commercial center; and WHEREAS, said Conditional Use Permit request has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended by Resolution 83-68, in that Environmental Assessment 2001-433 has been recommended with mitigation measures for certification; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify a recommendation for approval of said Conditional Use Permit: 1 . The Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the City's General Plan in that the proposed project furthers the City's General Plan goals for a full service community. The use is consistent with the goals and policies and intent of the General Plan Land Use Element (Chapter 2) . 2. The approval of this Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance in that the project will conform to development standards and the standards included in Specific Plan 2001-054. 3. The proposed land use will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare or injurious to, or incompatible with other land uses in that the project will integrate into the existing neighborhood 38-L G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettCUPReso.WPD ��51. City Council Resolution 2002- Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 - RLF Development Adopted: February 19, 2002 4. An Environmental Assessment has been prepared in accordance with CEQA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That the City Council does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit 2001-066 to allow a gasoline service station in a planned neighborhood shopping center subject to the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and made a part of as Exhibit "A". PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 19th day of February, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 38~ G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettCUPReso.WPD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-058 - RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 19, 2002 1. The subdivider agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this tentative map amendment or any final map thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. The development shall comply with Site Development Permit 2001-71 1, and all applicable Conditions of Approval. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettCUPReso.WPD RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR A SUPERMARKET, BANK, AND DRUG STORE ON A PORTION OF A 15 ACRE NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AVENUE 52 AND JEFFERSON STREET CASE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 APPLICANT: RLF DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 15th day of January, 2002, 5th day of February, 2002, and 19th day of February, 2002 hold duly noticed Public Hearings for the La Quinta Court project for review of Site Development Permit to allow the construction of a supermarket and drugstore on a portion of a 15 acre shopping center at the southeast corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street, more particularly described as: APN 760-290-005 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 11 th day of December, 2001, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing and recommended approval of the Site Development Permit, subject to the conditions of approval; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering Environmental Assessment 2001-433, and all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings for approval of said Site Development Permit: 1. The proposed Site Development Permit is consistent with the General Plan goals, policies and programs relating to the Neighborhood Commercial land use designation, and supports the development of a variety of retail uses within a Specific Plan. 2. The proposed Site Development Permit is consistent with the standards of the Zoning Ordinance and is consistent with Specific Plan 2001-054, as conditioned, which establishes development standards for the project. 3. The proposed Site Development Permit will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, as it has been designed to be compatible with surrounding development, and conform with the City's standards and requirements, as conditioned. 54 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPReso.WPD City Council Resolution 2002- Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 - RLF Development Adopted: February 19, 2002 4. The proposed Site Development Permit, as conditioned, complies with the architectural design standards for Specific Plan 2001-054, and implements the standards and guidelines included in that document. 5. The proposed Site Development Permit, as conditioned, is consistent with the landscaping standards in Specific Plan 2001-054 and implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case. 2. That it does hereby require compliance with those mitigation measures required in EA 2001-433. 3. That it does approve Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on the 19th day of February 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPReso.WPD City Council Resolution 2002- Site Development Permit 2001-71 1 - RLF Development Adopted: February 19, 2002 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California L�So 3 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPReso.WPD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2001- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 19, 2002 1. The developer agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the developer of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary permits and/or clearances from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting the improvement plans for City approval. 3. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. & 13.24.170, La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Quality Resources Control Board's ("SWQRCB") Order No. 99-08- DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs five (5) acres or more of land, or that disturbs less than five (5) acres of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than five (5) acres of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). 38 CC i G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 1 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 19, 2002 B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this Site Development Permit. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020, LQMC): 1. Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2. Temporary Sediment Control. 3. Wind Erosion Control. 4. Tracking Control. 5. Non -Storm Water Management. 6. Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All of applicant's erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off site grading being done in relation to this project. F. All approved project BMPs shall be maintained in their proper working order throughout the course of construction, and until all improvements have been accepted by the City. 4. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). PROPERTY RIGHTS 5. Prior to the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire, or confer, those easements, and other property rights necessary for the construction and/or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services, and for the maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 38 �53 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 2 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 19, 2002 6. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 7. Unless the ultimate developed right-of-way can be documented, the public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) - 120-foot ultimate developed right-of-way. 2. Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial) - 1 10-foot ultimate developed right- of-way. 8. Right-of-way geometry for property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawing #805, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 9. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 10. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public right- of-ways as follows: A. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) - 20-foot from the ROW-P/L. B. Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial) - 20-foot from the ROW-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Parcel Map. 38:,,3 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 3 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 19, 2002 11. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas shown on the Site Development Plan. 12. The applicant shall vacate all abutter's right -of -access to public streets and properties from all frontages along such public streets and properties, excepting those access points shown on the Site Development Plan. 13. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, ingress/egress, or other encroachments will occur. 14. Before the applicant may be permitted to vacate, or abandonment, any existing right-of-way, or access easement, which will diminish the access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall submit a proposed alternate right-of-way or access easement to those properties, or shall submit notarized letters of consent from all affected property owners; the final approval of which rests with the City. 15. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of this Site Development Permit and the date of final acceptance of the on and off -site improvements for this Site Development Permit, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these conditions of approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 16. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 4 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 19, 2002 A. Off -Site Street Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical The street improvement plans shall include permanent traffic control and separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. B. Off -Site Street Median Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' C. Perimeter Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' D. On -Site Site Development Plan: 1 if = 40' Horizontal E. On -Site Utility Plan: 1 if = 20' Horizontal F. On -Site Landscape Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal G. On -Site Lighting Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. "Site Development" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements; and show the existing street improvements out to at least the center lines of Jefferson Street & Avenue 52. "Site Utility" plans shall normally include all sub -surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to sewer lines, water lines, fire protection and storm drainage systems. "Rough Grading" plans shall include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. 17. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040, LQMC. 18. The City maintains standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City resolution, the 4 applicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction 3 9 -L notes from the City. C, 61. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 5 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 19, 2002 19. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all complete, approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format which can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 20. Prior to the conditional approval of this Site Development Plan, or the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 21. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Site Development Permit, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28, LQMC. 22. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monuments. 23. When improvements are to be secured through a SIA, and prior to any permits being issued by the City, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on and off -site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution, or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit costs shall be approved by the City Engineer. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 6 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 19, 2002 At the same time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for the security determination of the SIA, the applicant shall also submit one copy of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " reduction of each page of the Parcel Map, along with one copy of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " Vicinity Map. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates for its own on and off -site improvements. Cost estimates for the security of telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements will not be required. Development -wide improvements shall not be agendized for final acceptance by the City Council until the City has received confirmation from the telephone authority that the applicant has met all the requirements for telephone service to all proposed buildings shown on the Site Development Plan. 24. When improvements are phased through an administrative approval (e.g., Phasing Plan, Site Development Permits, etc.), all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the occupancy of any permanent buildings in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The same submittal criteria shall apply to all subsequent phases as required for the first phase submittal. (E.g. detailed cost estimates, 8-1 /2" x 11 if reductions, etc.) 25. In the event the applicant fails to construct improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, or other phasing method, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 39 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 7 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 19, 2002 GRADING 26. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 27. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 28. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, and C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on any final map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions submitted with its application for a grading permit. 29. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 30. The applicant shall minimize differences in elevation between the adjoining properties. DRAINAGE 31. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), LQMC, Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03 and the following: 33 64 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 8 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT. FEBRUARY 19, 2002 32. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water may be disposed of in a trickling sand filter and leach field approved by the City Engineer. The sand filter and leach field shall be designed to contain surges of up to 3 GP/1,000 sq. ft. of landscape area, and infiltrate 5 g.p.d./1,000 sq. ft. Or nuisance water may be diverted to the landscaped areas. 33. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 34. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 35. Pursuant to Section 13.24.120 (D), LQMC, the On -Site retention basin shall be sized to not only accommodate the on -site storm runoff, but also the tributary runoff from the adjacent streets. UTILITIES 36. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.1 10 (Utilities), LQMC. 37. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 38. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 39. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. 3 J l! J G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 9 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 19, 2002 The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 40. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Off -Site Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Properties), LQMC. 41. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit a Transportation Demand Management (T.M.) Plan in accordance with the City's T.M. Ordinance, Chapter 9.180, LQMC. The applicant shall be responsible for improvements found necessary to mitigate the traffic impacts of this development. 42. Pursuant to Section 9.150.080(A)(8)(b), LQMC, the applicant shall provide 90- foot uninterrupted driveway throats into the parking lot, or alternatively provide a combination of a dedicated right turn deceleration lane and the drive throat that will equal a total of 90 feet. 43. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC, adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, and as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 44. Standard corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #805, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 45. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations which convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue for street sweeping. 46. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Avenue 52 (Primary Arterial; 1 10' R/W option): Widen south side of street along all frontage adjacent to the Specific Plan boundary. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing 3 j G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 10 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 19, 2002 roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. Other significant new improvements required for installation in, or adjacent, to the subject right of way include: (a) 6-foot wide meandering sidewalk (b) 18-foot wide landscaped median from the roundabout to the east boundary of the Specific Plan The pavement rehabilitation/reconstruction, and landscape median improvements, are eligible for reimbursement from the City's Development Impact Fee fund in accordance with policies established for that program. 2) Jefferson Street a) Applicant shall construct median openings and turn pockets to accommodate the turning movements authorized by these Conditions of Approval. b) Applicant shall install a traffic signal at the project's main entry, located 1 130 ± feet south of Avenue 52 centerline, when warrants are met. Applicant is responsible for 50% of cost to design and install traffic signal if complementing cost share from development on other side of street is available at time signal is required. Applicant shall enter into an improvement agreement and post security for 50% of the cost to design and construct the traffic signal prior to issuance of an onsite grading permit; the security shall remain in effect until the signal is constructed by the applicant or the developer on the other side of the street. If the land on the other side of the street does not have an approved project connecting to the subject intersection, Applicant shall pay 100% of cost to design and install a signal at the resulting "T" intersection. If, however, the Applicant's development trails the progress of the u67 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 11 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 19, 2002 development on the other side of the street and the other development is connecting to the subject intersection, the Applicant is responsible for 50% of the cost as previously stated in this condition. 47. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential Collector Secondary Arterial Primary Arterial Major Arterial 3.0" A.C./4.50" A.B. 4.0"/5.00" 4.0"/6.00" 4.5"/6.00" 5.5"/6.50" or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. PARKING LOTS 1) The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 48. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Primary Entry (Jefferson Street, 1 130 ± feet S. of the C/L Intersection with Avenue 52): Full turn access. B. Secondary Entry (Jefferson Street, 810 ± feet S. of the C/L Intersection with Avenue 52): Right turn in, Right turn out. C. Secondary Entry (Jefferson Street, 490 ± feet S. of the C/L Intersection with Avenue 52): Right turn in, Right turn out, Left turn in. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 12 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 19, 2002 D. Primary Entry (Avenue 52, 375 ±feet E. of the C/L Intersection with Jefferson Street): Left & Right turn in, Right turn out. E. Secondary Entry (Avenue 52, 635 ± feet E. of the C/L Intersection with Jefferson Street): Right turn in, Right turn out. F. This Secondary Entry shall be a shared access drive/road with the adjacent landowner and be centered on the easterly property line. The shared access drive/road layout shall be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In the event the adjacent landowner desires a security gate serving its property, the gate shall be located away from the property line sufficient distance with the following access road design features occurring on the adjacent landowners property: adequate stacking, a rejection turnaround feature, and a separate lane for guests. In the event the adjacent landowner does not reasonably cooperate with the applicant in assisting with the shared access drive/road requirement, the City may allow the applicant to implement an alternative design concept satisfactory to the City Engineer, including but not limited to, elimination of the shared access requirement. Nothing in this condition requires the adjacent landowner to pay for sufficient improvements to implement the shared access requirement in a manner that serves the development proposed by Site Development Permit 0 1 -711. However, reasonable cooperation by the adjacent landowner does include granting of reciprocal cross -access easements between the two landowners that facilitate construction of improvements necessary to implement the shared access concept on both properties in a manner that precludes unnecessary reconstruction of the improvements in the future. 49. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 50. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 51. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements. 3 9 J ,63 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 13 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 19, 2002 CONSTRUCTION 52. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 53. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential tracts are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the tract or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPING 54. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscape Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC. 55. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. 56. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit plans for approval by the Community Development Department prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking is complete, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner prior to submitting for signature by the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. U73 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 14 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 19, 2002 57. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 18 inches of curbs long public streets. 58. Only incidental stormwater will be permitted to be retained in landscape areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right of way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to Section 9.100.040(B) (7), LQMC. PUBLIC SERVICES 59. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by Sunline Transit and approved by the City Engineer. QUALITY ASSURANCE 60. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 61. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 62. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. After tributary -area improvements are complete and soils have been permanently stabilized where retention basins have been constructed, testing shall include sand filter percolation tests, as approved by the City Engineer. 63. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all public improvement plans which were signed by the City Engineer. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City to reflect the as -built conditions. 4 elm �7J. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 15 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 19, 2002 MAINTENANCE 64. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 65. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. FEES AND DEPOSITS 66. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. GENERAL: 67. The subdivider agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this tentative map amendment or any final map thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 68. No signage is approved as part of this approval. The project proponent shall submit a master signage program for Planning Commission approval. 69. Proposed buildings for the gas station site, or pads A, B, C, D, E or F shall be required to submit separate Site Development Permits. 70. All buildings on the site, and particularly the drug store building, shall be designed to include the covered walkways and heavy pillars proposed for the supermarket building. The design of the entire site shall demonstrate a consistent level of architectural detailing with specific attention to rear elevations. 71. The entry of the drug store building shall be squared on the corner, and consistent with the supermarket building design. 4 �!7 2 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 16 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-711 RLF DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 19, 2002 72. The retention basin landscaping shall be redesigned to include landscaping on the slopes and bottom of sufficient size and density to stabilize soils. 73. The project site plan (and all exhibits which use the site plan as a base map) shall be redesigned to provide trash enclosures adjacent to the building which they serve. The new site plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to submittal of the final document after City Council approval. 403 ,►73t, G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CCBartlettSDPCOA.wpd 17 RLF DEVELOPMENT pueblo plaza shopping center SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-054 OUTLINE February 5, 2002 INTRODUCTION SECTION 1.0 Project Summary 1.1 Project Site 1.2 Existing Site Characteristics 1.3 Archeological and Historical 1.4 Objectives 1.5 Design Theme 1.6 Required Findings/CEQA SECTION 2.0 Site Plan 2.1 Site Plan 2.2 Land Use Summary 2.3 Site Plan Compliance SECTION 3.0 Architectural Elevations 3.1 Architectural Elevations SECTION 4.0 Landscaping Plan 4.1 Landscaping Plan 4.2 Plant Palette SECTION 5.0 Signage 5.1 Monument Signage 5.2 Major Anchor/Pad Tenant Signage 5.3 Shop Tenant Signage SECTION 6.0 Access and Circulation Plan 6.1 Vehicular Access and Circulation Plan 6.2 Pedestrian, Bicycle and Golf Car Plan 6.3 Delivery Access and Circulation Plan 6.4 Handicap Accessibility 6.5 Circulation Element Development Policy SECTION 7.0 Parking Plan 7.1 Parking 7.2 Parking Summary 7.3 Parking Lot Lighting SECTION 8.0 Grading Plan 8.1 Grading 8.2 Parking/Pad Grading 8.3 Retention SECTION 9.0 Utility Plan 9.1 Wet Utility Plan 9.2 Dry Utility Plan SECTION 10.0 Recycling Plan SECTION 11.0 Phasing plan 11.1 Phasing Plan 11.2 Parcel Map SECTION 12.0 Adaptability CITY OF LA QUINTA GENERAL PLAN GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ARE SHOWN IN ITALICS APPROPRIATE EXHIBITS ARE LOCATED AT THE END OF EACH SECTION 404 RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center INTRODUCTION This project is being developed by Richard L. Frandsen of RLF DEVELOPMENT. Mr. Frandsen is a well experienced and highly successful market anchored neighborhood shopping center developer. He has over 30 years of experience with Lucky Supermarket (now owned by Albertson's) as real estate director, selecting and developing over 100 market anchored sites for Lucky and their subsidiary Gemco. In the past twelve years, with headquarters in the Desert, Dick has developed over two million square feet of shopping centers on his own account. His most recent local developments include the Albertson's anchored centers located at 42"d & Washington, (156,000SF) and Deep Canyon & Highway 111 (86,000SF) both in Palm Desert, and the soon to be built Albertson's located at Monterey and Country Club (100,000SF) in Rancho Mirage. Leasing activities will performed by Timothy R. Bartlett of Bartlett Commercial. Tim has over twenty years of commercial real estate experience of which twelve years were spent in the Desert on numerous retail commercial projects, including Dick's local shopping center developments. With nearly seventy years of experience combined, including over twenty-five years in the Desert, their local prospective insures the center will be a success. With a thorough understanding of the Desert shoppers', Dick and Tim will create a center that will not only meet the needs of the patrons but will enable the tenants to flourish. Their philosophy is simple: for a shopping center to be successful you must create an environment which allows the tenants to serve their patrons: where access and circulation are safe and convenient, where ample parking is ideally located for each and every tenant, where architectural enhancements provide ambiance without sacrificing functionality and visibility and where the tenant mix is well suited for the particular marketplace. 40 r 2 RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center SECTION 1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY 1.1 PROJECT SITE The project site is located on the southeast corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 52 in the City of La Quinta. Jefferson is a major arterial connecting points south to the Interstate 10 freeway to the north. Avenue 52 is a major arterial connecting points west to the Interstate 86 freeway to the east. The City of La Quinta has recognized the importance of this intersection and is now completing a revolutionary traffic circle, as well as the ultimate street improvements on Jefferson and most of Avenue 52. The project is ideally situated in the heart of major resort development including La Quinta's most prolific country clubs: Rancho La Quinta, The Citrus, Tradition, and PGA West. The site is opposite from two proposed residential projects, The Ranch and The Grove, the later of which is currently being developed, and adjacent to the Country Club of the Desert, now under construction. The 15 gross acre site is also ideally buffered by the Coachella Canal to the south and southeast and a vacant 10.00 acre property sited for a general plan and zoning change to high density multifamily residential. We understand that a multifamily project is currently being planned. With only a multifamily neighbor , a water canal buffer, at the intersection of two major arterioles this property is truly a planners dream neighborhood shopping center site. 1.2 EXISTING SITE CHARACTERISTS The existing site has two insignificant, non -conforming residential structures, one situated on a large man-made mound facing Jefferson, and another facing Avenue 52 both of which scream for redevelopment at such an important and prestigious corner. The sandy soil has very little vegetation, which combined with the deteriorating structures, gives the site a shabby, even ghostly appearance, certainly not appropriate for the entrance to La Quinta's most notable resorts. The site is currently being utilized as a staging area for the construction of the Jefferson Street and Avenue 52 improvements. There are two contiguous parcels, the corner parcel is 9.25 gross acres (9.04 net acres) and to the south along Jefferson is a parcel of 5.9 gross acres (5.83 net acres). The ultimate right- of-way has been granted to accommodate the ultimate street widening which is currently being constructed. 1.3 ARCHEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE The results of the records search and field survey for the site indicated that no archeological sites have been recorded or finds made. In addition, neither of the two residential structures on the site are regarded as historically or architecturally significant. The site is generally flat, with elevations averaging 20' above sea level, with the exception of a man-made dune. The soil has an appearance of farming activities which had ceased many years ago. Tie 4 3 RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center vegetation is sparse scatter of desert scrub. The property offers no archeological or historical value and is quite simply ripe for development. 1.4 OBJECTIVES The objectives of this Specific Plan is to ensure that the development of the site is consistent with the General Plan, the Zoning, and the surrounding developments while fulfilling the goals and objectives of the City of La Quinta. This Specific Plan is intended to provide a level of flexibility to respond to the ever changing retail marketplace while maintaining a coherent shopping center consistent with the objectives of the City. This harmonious project is intended to serve the resort residential communities in the immediate trade area. Our goal is to provide a convenient neighborhood shopping center which is both pedestrian and vehicular friendly while maintaining a residential scale with a resort -like ambiance. The NC category shall provide areas for business offering the provision and sale of food, drugs, sundries and personal services which meet the daily needs of the immediate neighborhood trade area, typically 3,000 to 6,000 people. Typical businesses allowed in the NC category include grocery supermarkets, drugstores, eating and drinking establishments, automotive service stations, personal services, such as laundry and barber salon, and small scale administrative and professional offices, such as medical services, finance insurance and real estate offices. The maximum F.A.R. of a project in the NC category shall be 0.25%, limited to two stories and less than 20 acres. The project shall include appropriate planning and urban design to encourage travel by walking, bicycling and public transit, particularly for residents from adjacent neighborhoods. 1.5 DESIGN THEME The project is planned to ultimately provide approximately 120,000 square feet of retail, restaurant and service related uses including a market and a drug anchor. Planned uses include casual and fine dining, financial institutions, a fuel station, a coffee house, health and beauty services, dry cleaning, pet care, pool care and uses generally associated with a market and drug anchored neighborhood shopping center. The plan provides safe and convenient ingress and egress to the center from two arterial, as well as distinct and efficient on -site circulation for pedestrian, vehicular and delivery traffic. The ample and well situated parking and buildings will be set back from both Jefferson and Avenue 52 by a large landscaped linear park -like meandering sidewalk. The center will be designed to accommodate golf car parking and circulation should access to the site be permitted. Being adjacent to The Country Club of the Desert, The Grove and The Citrus we estimate that there will be over 2,000 golf cars. Access to the site will be convenient from all directions which are served by an 8' meandering sidewalk/golf cart path. !! i 4 RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center 1.6 REQUIRED FINDINGS/CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT COMPLIANCE The following findings shall be made by the City Council prior to approval of this specific plan: Consistency with General Plan: The plan is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. Public Welfare: Approval of the plan will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. Land Use Compatibility: The specific plan is compatible with zoning on adjacent properties. Property Suitability: The specific plan is suitable and appropriate for the subject property. This Specific Plan has been determined to be exempt from the requirements of an environmental impact report under the California Environmental Quality Act, which will require a mitigated negative declaration under the provisions of California Government Code. An environmental impact report (EIR) was prepared for the original annexation of the property with the last General Plan update. In addition the new improvements to Jefferson were designed with this land use in place which required an updated focused EIR. A mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared for this project and found acceptable by staff. The property is zoned neighborhood commercial (CN) and the general plan designation is neighborhood commercial (NC) as well. The Specific Plan designates a market/drug anchored neighborhood commercial shopping center following the true intent of the zoning and the general plan. 4l 5 RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center SECTION 2.0 SITE PLAN 2.1 SITE PLAN The site is accessible from Avenue 52 with two right -in, right -out and left -in access driveways, and from Jefferson with one right -in, right -out and left -in access driveway, one right -in and right -out driveway and one full movement driveway suitable for a signal when warranted. Since the traffic circle does not provide a controlled break in the traffic, a signal, when warranted, will provide safe pedestrian, bicycle and golf car crossing. The nearly rectangular site with its majority of frontage on Jefferson is planned to consist of a market anchor placed in the middle of the site, immediately surrounded by shop space (A & B) with two freestanding pads on Avenue 52 (Pad A & F), a fuel and auto -wash station on the corner, a free standing coffee house/restaurant, two freestanding pads (Pads B & C) on Jefferson, a drug store, a bank (Pad D) and another pad (Pad E). The market is served by an open and unobstructed field of parking with cart storage, shade trees and handicap accessibility. The markets west facing frontage is shaded by continuous expansive overhangs, broken only to accentuate the main entrances. The surrounding shops are set back from the curvilinear (to slow traffic) access drives and shaded as well. The south facing end of Shops B shade structure provides extra depth while the north facing Shops A structure is architectural only providing enhanced visibility. The Shops are flanked by convenient parking and served by a delivery access and rubbish removal system completely contained in the rear. Pad A, a likely sit-down restaurant site offers great visibility and generous parking. Pad F a likely service related tenant site offers great access for delivery and distribution. The fuel station and auto -wash are well situated on the actual corner yet provide good circulation from either direction. The drive aisle throat is extended from the north south direction to the east west direction to eliminate any disruption in traffic accessing the site from Avenue 52. The coffee house with convenience window offers good visibility and great accessibility and a combined circulation pattern with the fuel station an auto wash. Pad B and Pad C offer great visibility and access with secured parking while maintaining a clear unobstructed view of the major anchor. The drug site offers great visibility, access and hidden truck delivery access without blocking Shops B and Pad E. Pad D is sited for a bank with a convenience window which allows drive around capabilities. Pad E, another good restaurant site offers good visibility and even better down valley views. Of course the retention area is hidden from view in the natural low grade elevation. The coffee house, drug store, community bank and potential restaurant pads include convenience windows or drive thru capabilities for automobile and golf car access. The delivery of goods, trash pick-up and "back of house" activities will be screened behind the market, drug and shops and buffered from the adjoining vacant residential property by a service roadway, landscaping and an eight foot high block wall. The curvilinear design of the access roadways and drive aisles reflect how one actually drives. The primary entry drives provide clear unobstructed access to the site without interruption for at least ninety feet when the incoming lanes are measured from the major arterial to the first parking stall. Even the convenient fuel station access insures smooth traffic ingress and egress. 4f 6 1 on RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center 2.2 LAND USE SUMMARY In general, this specific plan is consistent with the NC Zone unless a different use or standard is identified. Should a development standard or use contained in this Specific Plan conflict with the standard or use in the City of La Quinta Zoning Code, the provisions of the Specific Plan shall govern. In the instances when a particular standard or use is not identified the provisions of the City of La Quinta Zoning Code shall govern. Permitted uses include grocery stores (including ones in excess of 50,000 SF), drug stores, retail stores, convenience stores (including ones open 24 hours per day), restaurants (with or without drive-thru or counter take-out), coffee shops, clothing stores, jewelry stores, sundries, office supplies, pets, furniture, appliances, hardware, building materials, service stations, car wash, golf car sales and service, nurseries, beauty shops, hair, nail and tanning salons, pet grooming, travel services, videotape rentals, shoe repair, appliance repair, dry cleaners, copy services, mailing services, banks, financial services, real estate services, medical clinics, veterinary clinics, health clubs, portable vending uses (flower stands, etc.), temporary uses (seasonal sales, art shows, etc.) and accessory uses associated with principal uses as determined by the Director. Building/Pad Likely Use Market supermarket Drug drug store* Shops A retail/service/restaurant Shops B retail/service/restaurant Fuel fuel/wash* Coffee coffee/fast food* Pad A retail/restaurant Pad B retail/service Pad C retail/service Pad D bank* Pad E retail/service/restaurant* Pad F retail/service/restaurant* Retention Street Total Gross Area Net Project Area Site Coverage Building Size Land Size 55,100 SF 213,500 SF 4.90 AC 16,800 SF 96,200 SF 2.21 AC 11,700 SF 43,250 SF 0.99 AC 9,800 SF 38,900 SF 0.89 AC 3,000 SF 58,300 SF 1.34 AC 2,400 SF 19,750 SF 0.45 AC 5,000 SF 27,850 SF 0.64 AC 3,000 SF 21,600 SF 0.50 AC 3,000 SF 18,100 SF 0.42 AC 4,350 SF 33,300 SF 0.76 AC 3,750 SF 24,650 SF 0.57 AC 2,800 SF 11,550 SF 0.27 AC 40,600 SF 0.93 AC 12,550 SF 0.29 AC 120,700 SF 660,100 SF 15.15 AC 120,700 SF 606,950 SF 13.93 AC 19.8% *Convenience Windows will be allowed at these locations. tl RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center 2.3 SITE PLAN COMPLIANCE Standard Min. -Max. Building Site Maximum Building Height (scenic preserve*) Maximum Number of Stories Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Minimum Building Setback Minimum Building Setback (Residential) Minimum Building Setback (Non-residential) Minimum Landscaping Setback Minimum Landscaping Setback (Residential) Minimum Landscaping Setback (Non-resid.) Minimum Landscaping Building Area Minimum Landscaping Parking Area Minimum Parking Required NC Zone 1-20 ac. 35'(22'/150') 2 35% 30' 30' 10, 20' 15' 5' 5% 15% 604 Specific Plan 15.15 ac. 35'(227150') 2 25% 30' 30' 10, 20' 15' 6' 5% 15% 614 * Building elevations in the scenic preservation setback will be allowed to exceed the 22' height limitation by up to 4" to a total maximum height of 26' on portions of the building designated as the entryway and or "tower" elements in the spirit of the architecture of the supermarket building. 'Loll pl,t.a. �ANr4\01, *_- I RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center SECTION 3.0 ELEVATIONS 3.1 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS The goal of the architectural theme is to provide a southwestern style which can effectively utilize generous roof overhangs (provide shade for the majority of the west facing frontage), eliminate the "movie set facade" tack on architecture (predominate in shopping centers) and diminish the larger size of the major anchors both in height and width. We determined that the refreshing, yet timeless, Santa Fe design accomplishes this goal and adds a new dimension to the ambiance of La Quinta's architectural pallet, while maintaining the historic architectural fundamentals of the southwest. This style is especially well suited for the desert climate and nearly imperative considering the western orientation of the center. Even the larger market and drug buildings will appear to be lowered and broken up to a more residential scale by the articulated covered walkways. Rather than increase the building heights with false roofs, facades or large parapets to simulate an architectural style and to hide rooftop equipment, adobe style screens will add another architectural feature, providing an undulating roof line reminiscent of the mountain range while protecting the views we treasure. These relatively low architectural elements will return back into the building eliminating the "movie set facade" frontage architecture. The clean lines and unobtrusive structures will be cast in earthen tones like our painted canyons and majestic mountains. Even the rear of buildings will be articulated by columns, varying heights of equipment enclosures and truck access pop -outs further eliminating the "movie set" architecture. �7 RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center SECTION 4.0 LANDSCAPING PLAN 4.1 LANDSCAPING PLAN The goal of the landscaping is to compliment the southwestern theme with drought tolerant planting and drip irrigation, which will insure water conservation, while utilizing alternate blooming flora of natures bountiful pallet providing color year round. Our theme also incorporates extensive use of boulders and decomposed granite of various colors to provide durable and natural pathways. We choose fast growing trees and shrubs to reach that grown - in look as quickly as possible. Palms are almost conspicuous by there absence for they do not provide shade and are not consistent with the architectural theme. January to March will showcase the Desert Sweet Acacia. March to June will be announced by the yellow flowering Palo Verde lining the entry and main circulation roadway. July to October will showcase the Mexican Bird Of Paradise. October to December will highlight the Cape Honeysuckle. The forever blooming bougainvillea and lantana will adorn the gentle mounding that defines the meandering paths which encounter flowering Texas ranger and indigo bush under the shade of the pyramidal canopies of the Mesquite and Palo Verde trees all wallowing in the scent of flowering jasmine. 4.2 PLANT PALETTE Location Common Name Botanical Name Size Spacing Trees Entry/Circulation Blue Palo Verde Cercidium floridum 24' /36" box as shown Parking Field Chilean Mesquite Prosopis chilensis 24"/36" box as shown Accent Sweet Acacia Acacia smallii 24"/36" box as shown Shrubs Desert Spoon Dasylirion Welled 5 gal as shown Texas Ranger Leucophyllum Frutessens 5 gal as shown Bush Cherry Syzigiun Paniculatum 5 gal as shown Ocotillo Fouguieria Splendens Bare root as shown Mex. Bird of Paradise Casalpinie Mexican 5 gal as shown Octopus Agave Agave Vilmoriniana 5 gal as shown Datil Yucca Yucca Baccata 5 gal as shown Carissa M.'Prostrata' 5 gal as shown Cassia Nemophila 5 gal as shown Trailing Vines Bougainvillea Various Bougainvillea 15 gal as shown Honeysuckle Justicia spicigera 5 gal as shown Jasmine Jasmine grandiflorum 5 gal as shown Ground Cover Entry/Circulation Purple Lantana Lantana montevidensis 1 gal/5 gal 6' o.c. Parking Field New Gold Lantana Lantana sp `New Gold' 1 gal/5 gal 6' o.c. Accent Both Lantana Various Lantana 1 gal/5 gal 6' o.c. Boulder/D.G. Boulders with array of decomposed granite 2" cover 41. 10 RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center Please note that two sizes are shown, since the "grown -in" design dictates various plant sizes. Boulders will range in size from large to small, no artificial minimum boulder size is intended. 4.3 LANDSCAPING AREAS The total landscape area is 162,978 SF. The retention area will only be landscaped around the perimeter, since it is well hidden, and will only impede percolation. In addition, the retention area is proposed to be used as a nursery which will provide seasonal color and dense foliage. 41 11 RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center SECTION 5.0 SIGNAGE 5.1 MONUMENT SIGNAGE Monument Signage will be used to identify the major anchor tenants and the fuel tenant ID and pricing. The major anchor tenants Monument Signs will be located at the main entry on Avenue 52 and Jefferson as depicted on the plan. These sign faces will be no greater than 50 SF and no higher than 8'. They will not be placed within the triangle formed by two points 20' from the intersection of the entryways and arterioles. The fuel tenant ID and pricing Monument Signs will be located on Avenue 52 and Jefferson as depicted on the plan. These sign faces will be no greater than 25 SF and no higher than 8. 5.2 MAJOR ANCHOR/PAD TENANT SIGNAGE The market anchors and the pad tenants shall have signage as depicted on the plan. 5.3 SHOP TENANT SIGNAGE The shop tenants shall have one identification sign per lease area frontage, with one square foot per lineal foot of lease frontage mounted on the entry overhang or protrusion up to a maximum of 50 SF and no higher than top of the parapet wall. The signs will be individual channel letters mounted on a recessed mounted sign box with concealed illumination. In addition, the shop tenants shall have an under canopy sign hanging perpendicular to the frontage for strolling shoppers no greater than 3 SF. No letters shall exceed a maximum brightness of 100 foot lamberts nor 24 inches in height. The advertising or informative content of all signs shall be limited to letters designating the store name and/or trade name only. No flashing, flickering, blinking, animated or moving lights or signs shall be permitted. Paper signs, window stickers and handmade signs, whether or not of a temporary nature, are expressly prohibited. 4t 12 RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center SECTION 6.0 ACCESS AND CIRCULATION PLAN 6.1 VEHICULAR ACCESS AND CIRCULATION PLAN Vehicular access from Avenue 52 will be encouraged from the most western right -in, right -out and left -in accessway and from Jefferson with one right -in, right -out and left -in accessway, one right -in and right -out accessway and one full movement accessway designed for a signal when warranted. Onsite circulation includes meandering loops along the frontage of the site and along the frontage of the market and shops, with no invasive parking, allowing the parking fields to be preserved to serve the tenancy in their immediate vicinity and maintaining clear accessways. The main two-way approach and accessway on Avenue 52 shall be 30' wide connecting to the main full movement approach and accessway on Jefferson which shall be 42' wide, which includes a 30' wide two way accessway with an additional 12' wide turning lane. The two way approaches and accessways, on Jefferson, shall be 28' in width and have 90' of travel length before encountering parking aisles or stalls. The rear delivery approach and accessway on Avenue 52 shall be 26'wide 6.2 PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE, AND GOLF CAR PLAN Pedestrian and golf car access will be from the southern end on Jefferson and the eastern end from Avenue 52 via a 6' sidewalk which will widen to 8' along the projects boundary. Bicycle access will be from Jefferson and Avenue 52 by a 5' bike lane. Since the traffic circle does not provide a controlled break in the traffic, a signal, when warranted, will provide safe pedestrian, bicycle and golf car crossing from the western side of Jefferson which will serve the northern side of Avenue 52. Onsite circulation includes 8' wide meandering paths along Jefferson and Avenue 52 which extend to an articulated walkway in front of the major anchors, shops and pads. Although a 12' wide path is being contemplated we believe 8' is sufficient for pedestrian and golf car usage, since the bike path is on the street, thereby preserving as much landscaping and berming as possible. Until now golf car usage for shoppers has been only a dream in most forward thinking resort communities. We believe that dream will become a reality since the immediately adjacent clubs including The Country Club of the Desert, The Grove, The Citrus and The Ranch will likely generate over 2,500 golf cars alone, not to mention the nearby clubs including PGA West and Traditions which are not far away. This major intersection has already been identified by the EIR prepared for golf car routes. Golf car shopping will truly be the envy of resort communities world wide. Our plan rewards golf car shoppers and bicyclists with great access and preferred parking, further encouraging an environment friendly mode of transportation. 6.3 DELIVERY ACCESS AND CIRCULATION PLAN Delivery vehicle access from Avenue 52 will be at the most eastern driveway and from Jefferson at the full movement intersection. Onsite circulation for delivery vehicles will be confined to the rear of the major tenants and shops thereby segregating the vehicular circulation patterns while linking the two delivery vehicle access points. It was a challenge to 13 RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center provide access to the delivery of the drug anchor while maintaining a hidden "back of house" policy. Our plan provides a well hidden truck dock area with immediate ingress and egress. 6.4 HANDICAP ACCESSIBILITY Handicap parking is available at every pad building, as well as the market and shops. The path of travel is designated on the plan providing a safe and convenient mode of travel to all of the pads and shops alike. Wherever possible shade canopy landscaping were used for protection from the elements. Golf car and bicycle shoppers share the preferred parking and designated path of travel with handicap shoppers. The project will meet the City's standards for ADA parking. 6.5 CIRCULATION ELEMENT DEVELOPMENT POLICIES The circulation system shall provide a high level of mobility, efficiency, access and safety for all modes of transportation in La Quinta which shall preserve and enhance the City's unique character while providing a balanced mix of transportation resources in the community. The project shall provide access to major arterial by signalized intersections. 14 RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center SECTION 7.0 PARKING 7.1 PARKING The goal of the parking layout is to provide ample parking in locations that actually serve the shoppers. Many centers fulfill their parking requirements with "behind the store" or designated "employee" parking that does not serve the shoppers, nor the employees for that matter. Each potential use is designed with appropriate parking. Since all parking will be reciprocal, the overall requirement is one parking space for each 200 square feet with an allowance of up to 20% restaurants or 24,157 square feet. Parking will be provided by 9' wide and 19' deep stalls in open field, 9' x 17' where there is an overhang and 10' wide and 20' deep around the drug store. All double loaded parking lot drive aisles shall be 26' in width. Parking canopy structures shall be allowed within 6' of the All American Canal buffer, southern border, due to the excessive setback (125' total, 20' to fence), all others shall be no less than 10' from the property line per City standards. 7.2 PARKING SUMMARY Building/Pad Likely Use Building Size Market supermarket 55,164 Drug drug store 16,784 Shops A retail/service/food 117700 Shops B retail/service/food 9,800 Fuel fuel/wash 3,000 Coffee coffee/fast food 2,400 Pad A retail/restaurant 5,000 Pad B retail/service/bank 3,000 Pad C retail/service 3,000 Pad D bank 4,350 Pad E retail/restaurant 3,750 Pad F retail/service 2,800 Retention Parking Required/Provided 276 254 84 84 59 57 41 40 22 24 1 /100 24 22 1 /75 25/67 32 15/12 20 15 16 1 /250 17 22 1 /100 19/37 29 14 14 Total 120,784 1 /200 604/611 614 Parking shall conform to City standards with one space for each 200 square feet of building area with an allowance of up to 20% restaurants unless additional parking is provided. 41, 15 RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center 7.3 PARKING LOT LIGHTING The goal of the parking lot lighting is to provide adequate lighting while maintaining energy efficiency and preventing spill over. We often find shopping centers that are over illuminated creating hot spots and temporary disorientation due to the contrast of the surrounding night sky. Safety can be achieved without "Gestapo" lighting. We have focused the light on the main field of parking, pad parking, and entryway. "Back of house" delivery and service areas will be light from "wall packs" located below the architectural overhang with no greater than 150 watts per fixture while the fuel station and surrounding area will be light from the pump canopy. 16 RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center SECTION 8.0 GRADING 8.1 GRADING The existing topography is generally flat with the exception of a man-made mound and minor undulations with an overall gradient sloping to the south and the east. The continual flow has historically been to the south and east, however, due to the elevated canal the hundred year flood flow will return to Jefferson to points south and west eventually spilling into the canal. The majority of the site will drain toward the retention area with the exception of the Jefferson and Avenue 52 runoff which will drain to retention areas located in the generous landscape setback areas primarily located on the actual corner. 8.2 PARKING/PAD GRADING Parking will be shielded from view from either arterioles by mounding and architecturally compatible low height block walls. The grading plan as it relates to the newly improved road topography is quite straightforward. Jefferson and Avenue 52 begin at the intersection curb at an elevation of 28' and slope away to 25' in either direction. Jefferson does have a low point at the main driveway which is ideal for the eventual retention overflow condition in the grater than 100 year storm, yet Pad D accommodates up to the 100 year storm at this location. The balance of the site drains to and is eventually contained in the retention basin. The major anchors, shops and Pads C, D and E are set at 26' to 28', the average Jefferson Street elevation, while the fuel, coffee and Pads A, F, and B are set at 28, to 31', the traffic circle elevation. 8.3 RETENTION Storm water collecting on the site will flow into the retention basin (existing low point) ideally shielded from view behind the market and the shops to the rear of the site. Storm water collecting on the Jefferson Street frontage will flow into smaller retention basins located along Jefferson and Avenue 52. These smaller retention areas along the frontage will be incorporated in the landscaping theme with "sod free" high percolation depressions. Drip irrigation will eliminate nuisance water. The retention area may also be developed for another larger tenant if dry wells are introduced and the parking count is increased or a nursery which would not require additional parking. In addition, the retention basin could accommodate other entertainment uses like miniature golf, laser tag, beach volleyball, dog runs or similar activities which can not only coexist with the retention functional design, but do not require additional parking. 17 RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center SECTION 9.0 UTILITY PLAN 9.1 WET UTILITY PLAN According to CVWD a new 18" water main will be located on the northern and western side of the Coachella Canal from points east, which shall be looped through the project, connecting to a new 18"' water main near Jefferson connecting to points south. Detector checks will be located at each end (northeastern and southwestern) connections to the site. Water mains will be located in drive aisles connecting the fire hydrants and building service primarily in the "back of house" area. Sewer mains will connect the building service in the same fashion and will flow into a low point on the south eastern portion of the site just north of the retention basin to serve the adjacent residential area before flowing under the canal to points further south and east. 9.2 DRY UTILITY PLAN The existing overhead power lines on Jefferson shall be placed underground as well as all new power and telephone service to the buildings. Transformers shall be screened by decorative walls and landscaping when possible or painted to blend in to the surrounding buildings. Easements shall be granted by the developer to the appropriate agency as necessary for placement and access of utility lines and equipment. RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center SECTION 10.0 RECYCLING PLAN Recycling provisions shall be approved by the trash company prior to gaining approval by the Community Development Department. Trash bins are screened behind buildings and away from view whenever possible. SECTION 11.0 PHASING PLAN 11.1 PHASING PLAN The project is anticipated to be developed in two phases. The first phase will include construction of the onsite circulation meandering loops both on the frontage of Jefferson and in front of the market as well as the main parking field. The market and the drug anchors, the fuel and wash station, the coffee house, the bank Pad D, Shops B and portions of Shops A are also planned for the first phase. The balance of Shops A and Pads A, B, C, E and F are planned for subsequent phases. Each of these pads can easily be constructed with minimal disruption to the circulation plan and other shopping activities. The architectural design for the market, shops, drug and bank are included in this specific plan. The balance of the architectural designs for the pads in the first phase are forthcoming. 11.2 PARCEL PLAN The parcel map is designed to approximate the land area associated with each tenant and their respective parking fields. Nonetheless, there will be reciprocal access and parking easements attached to each parcel. The building location within each parcel may be reconfigured pending tenant interest, as long as the major drive aisles are maintained. 4.. 19 RLF DEVELOPMENT Specific Plan 2001-054 Pueblo Plaza Shopping Center SECTION 12.0 ADAPTABILITY One of the architectural and landscaping theme's primary objectives is to emit a well seasoned look. Our plan uses fast growing landscaping that thrives in the Desert heat, rather than struggling to survive, coupled with ancient "adobe" building materials of stucco that stands the test of time. To further enhance the "grown in" look, random accent trees will be 24" box and 36" box coupled with random 15 gallon shrubs and oversized ground cover. To further enhance the natural patina of stucco that normally only comes with age, every stucco application will contain a final aging color sprayed after the finish coat (fogging). Landscaping will appear more mature with varying tree and shrub sizing and new buildings will look old with a variegated stucco treatment. We estimate that within a three year period the project will genuinely appear mature. One of our other primary objectives is to allow the center to evolve with the changing marketplace. As pads and shops are being developed and eventually redeveloped the site plan is designed to offer a high degree of flexibility. Each building as depicted can be reconfigured within each parcel as long as the major accessways are maintained. Shops can be transformed to larger tenant buildings as dry wells and additional parking replace the retention areas, as long as the 25% F.A.R. is not exceeded. Joint access can be accomplished with the adjacent multifamily residential site when that site is developed, providing a seamless master planned development. Undeveloped pads can be utilized for special and seasonal events and exhibitions. 422 Q11 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Continued Public Hearing to Certify a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-418, General Plan Amendment 2001-077, Change of Zone 2001-100 to Change the Land Use Classification and Zoning Designation to Low Density Residential Within the City of La Quinta Sphere of Influence for Subsequent Annexation for Approximately 200 Acres, Bounded on the North by Avenue 52, East by Monroe Street, South by Avenue 53, and East of the Existing City Limits. Applicant: NRI-LQLP Land, LLC RECOMMENDATION: Continue the Public Hearing to May 21, 2002. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: The applicant is requesting the public hearing be continued to May 21, 2002 as contained in the attached letter (Attachment 1). FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Continue the Public Hearing to May 21, 2002; or 4.�.: 2. Do not continue the Public Hearing to May 21, 2002; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. P:\J ERRY\CC-co.-clu b-deseret-continuence2-19-02. wpd Respectfully submitted, ry Hejman mmunity Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1 . Letter dated February 8, 2002 from Nancy Aaronson, NRI-LQLP Land, LLC P:\JERRY\CC-co.-club-deseret-continuence2-19-02.wpd ATTACHMENT #1 NRI-LQLP Land, LLC 81-100 Avenue 53 La Quinta, California 92253 February 8, 2002 Jerry Herman Director of Community Development City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253-1504 Re: NRI-LQLP Land, LLC Pre -Zoning Hearing — 240 Acre Annexation to the City of La Quinta Dear Jerry: RFC�c�` O� VELv/ Per our conversation, we believe it to be in the interest of all parties concerned to continue the above item, scheduled for the City Council on February 19th , to instead be heard at the City Council meeting of May 21, 2002. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Nancy Aaro NRI-LQLP , LLC oO.4 V11 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 Public Hearing to Certify an Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 98-375 and Approve Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1, an Amendment of the Text of Development Principles and Guidelines for the Specific Plan, and Amendment to the Site Plan Design Adjacent to Avenue 50 for a 110,500 Square Foot Shopping Center Located at the Northwest Corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. Applicant: Lundin Development Company RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying an Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, subject to all mitigation measures; and, 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1, subject to the findings and the Conditions of Approval. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Project History The original Specific Plan for this property, located at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50, was approved by the City Council on May 18, 1999 and provided principles and guidelines for a shopping center of approximately 111,000 4 P:\STAN\sp 98-034 cc rpt.wpd square feet of floor area, consisting of a combined 71,350 square foot market and drug store, 6,000 square feet of in -line stores, and five pad buildings with 33,600 square feet and 530 parking spaces (Attachment 1). Parcel Map 29052, approved at the same time, divided the 12.5 net acre commercial site into seven parcels from 18,438 square feet to 339,802 square feet for sales, leasing, or financing purposes with a 33 acre remainder parcel to the north and west for residential Tentative Tract 29053. The Parcel Map was recorded in December 1999. Tentative Tract 29053 was approved at the same time for 103 single family lots. The seven commercial parcels coincided with the buildings proposed with the original Specific Plan. Environmental Considerations Environmental Assessment 98-375 was adopted for the original Specific Plan 98-034, Parcel Map 29052, General Plan Amendment 98-060, Zone Change 98-089, and Tentative Tract Map 29053 in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, on June 1, 1999. An Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared and is recommended for approval. Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses North: RL / Vacant land (approved for residential Tentative Tract Map 29053) South: TC (Tourist Commercial)/Residential Subdivision under construction East: Commercial/ Shopping center under construction in the City of Indio West: RL / Vacant land (approved for residential Tract 29053) Project Request The proposed Amendment consists of design changes to the site plan, drainage facilities and text changes. The text changes include updating the text based on completed work, etc., and discussion of the proposed site and drainage changes (Attachment 2). As noted, the originally approved size of the center was approximately 111,000 square feet. Minor changes as a result of subsequent plan development reduced the square footage to 104,781 square feet. With this Amendment, the square footage of the floor area will be further reduced to 100,460 square feet. Albertsons/Sav-on, the major tenant, will be reduced from 60,080 to 57,560 square feet in size. The original six retail buildings will range from 2,200 to 8,500 square feet (previously 6,000 to 11,000 square feet) with a total of 42,900 square feet (previously 44,701 square feet). Two of these buildings are proposed to be restaurants with drive-thru pick-up, and a third gas station, possibly with a car wash. The total number of proposed parking spaces will be 474, down from the previous 519 spaces. 4 r) �. P:\STAN\sp 98-034 cc rpt.wpd 0 0 6. The project has been designed to have the shopping center retention basins adjacent to the Jefferson Street frontage. The original approved plan provided the retention basins in back of the required 20 foot landscape setback. Under this proposal, the majority of the 20 foot wide setback behind the meandering sidewalk will become part of the slope area of the retention basins. Because of this, no berming along Jefferson Street is provided. Zoning Code Section 9.100.040 only allows incidental storm water which falls on the setback to be retained in the setback and not retention basins for the entire site. A site plan design change is proposed in the southwest corner of the project adjacent to Avenue 50. Previously, there were two separate buildings, accessed by and west of the main Avenue 50 driveway. Parking spaces surrounded the two buildings. The revision proposes to place the two buildings (Pad "A" and "B") in a "L" shape, near the west and north property lines. Pad "A" building is proposed to have a 32 foot setback from the north property line, whereas Zoning Code Section 9.90.040 requires 50 feet from the property line, with 10 feet of landscaping, because the property to the north is zoned residential. The storm water retention basin for the adjacent residential tract is immediately abutting the north property line and is approximately 60 feet wide in that area. Therefore, the closest residential lot is approximately 96 feet from the Pad "A" building. Parking will be in front of the revised buildings and along the west property line. The applicant is proposing two new driveways with the revised plan. One right -turn in and right -turn out drive way is shown in front of the two building pads, approximately mid way between the main driveway and west property line. A new second exit only driveway is proposed behind, or west of the pad "A" building. The applicant at the previous meeting agreed to providing this as a gated emergency exit, but has not shown it on the plans. This driveway is connected to a drive aisle around the rear of both building pads. With the revised square footage of the project, 474 total parking spaces are required per current parking requirements. The plans indicate that 474 spaces will be provided. Public Notice The Specific Plan Amendment request was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on January 28, 2002. All property owners within 500 feet of the site were mailed a copy of the public hearing notice as required by the La Quinta Municipal Code. As of this writing, no written comments have been received. Public Agency Review All applicable agency comments received have been made part of the Conditions of Approval for this case. 4 P:\STAN\sp 98-034 cc rpt.wpd 003 Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed this request at its meetings of December 11, 2001, and January 8, 2002. After discussion, the hearing on December 1 1tn was continued by the Planning Commission in order to allow time for the applicant to restudy use of the 20 foot setback along Jefferson Street as part of their retention basin and new driveway accesses to Avenue 50. The applicant stated he could show a landscape design for the retention basin area that would provide screening of the parking lot surface using walls and landscaping. The applicant verbally agreed to the most westerly driveway on Avenue 50, behind revised Pad "A" and "B" being an "emergency only" right turn exit (Attachment 3) . At the January 8th hearing, the Planning Commission considered the revised landscaping plan submitted by the applicant. The plan shows landscape planting providing a screen along the area between Jefferson Street and the parking lot. Additionally, a six foot high block wall is proposed adjacent to the east side of the fast food pads on the north half of the property to provide screening. After discussion, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 2002-006 (4-1 with Commissioner Kirk voting no) recommending approval of the Amendment request with the access on Avenue 50 as proposed and the design for screening within the retention basin provided the meandering sidewalk along Jefferson Street adjacent to Pad "C" was moved slightly to the east to allow some berming between the sidewalk and retention basin (Attachment 4) . FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, subject to all mitigation measures; and, Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval; or 2. Do not adopt Resolutions of the City Council approving the request; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, J rr erman, Community Development Director 4' P:\STAN\sp 98-034 cc rpt.wpd 004 Approved for submission by: r homas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Specific Plan Document ( City Council only) 3. Planning Commission minutes for the meeting of December, 11, 2001 4. Planning Commission minutes for the meeting of January 8, 2002 005 P:\STAN\sp 98-034 cc rpt.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING AN ADDENDUM TO A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR SPECIFIC PLAN 98-034, AMENDMENT #1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 98-375, ADDENDUM LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 191h day of February, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing, as requested by Lundin Development Company on the Environmental Analysis for Specific Plan 98- 034, Amendment #1, located at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50, more particularly described as: Portions of Section 32, TSS, R7E, SBBM WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment complies with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended, Resolution 83-63, in that the Community Development Director has conducted an Addendum Study to Environmental Assessment 98-375 and has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because appropriate mitigation measures were made for Environmental Assessment 98-375, and an Addendum to the previously certified Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make findings to justify certification of said addendum to the Environmental Assessment; and, WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing, said certification was based on findings and subject to certain mitigation measures; and, WHEREAS, the La Quinta City Council did find the following facts to justify certification of an Addendum to said Environmental Assessment: 1. The proposed Amendment to the Specific Plan will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, with the implementation of mitigation measures. 4�. 006 PAea 98-375 addend cc res.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 98-375 Addendum Lundin Development Company Adopted: February 19, 2002 2. The proposed Amendment to the Specific Plan will not have the potential to achieve short term goals to the disadvantage of long-term goals, with the implementation of mitigation measures. 3. The proposed Amendment to the Specific Plan will not have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable when considering planned for proposed development in the immediate vicinity. 4. The proposed Amendment to the Specific Plan will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect human health, safety, and welfare, either directly or indirectly, with the implementation of mitigation measures. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitutes the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby concur with the environmental determination and Certification of an addendum to Environmental Assessment 98-375 for Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1 provided all mitigation measures are complied with. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 19t" day of February, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 4 3 P:\ea 98-375 addend cc res.wpd 007 City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 98-375 Addendum Lundin Development Company Adopted: February 19, 2002 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 4 :3 ', v 008 P:\ea 98-375 addend cc res.wpd Addendum to EA 98-375 Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Stan Sawa 760-777-7125 4. Project Location: Northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Lundin Development Co. 16400 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 207 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 6. Existing General Plan Designation: Community Commercial (CC) 7. Existing Zoning: Community Commercial (CC) 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) This Environmental Checklist and associated addendum review a Specific Plan amendment for 12.5 net acre shopping center at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings. The project site is currently vacant. Lands surrounding the project site are also generally vacant, with scattered single family residential. The approved Rancho La Quinta Residential Specific Plan occurs to the north of the proposed site. 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement). City of Indio - for street encroachment permits 43 000 P:\STAN\ea 98-375 chklist addend.wpd 1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Planning X Transportation/Circulation X Public Services Population and Housing X Biological Resources X Utilities and Service Systems X Geological Problems Energy and Mineral Aesthetics X Water Hazards X Cultural Resources X Air Quality X Noise Recreation Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. AN ADDENDUM TO THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a potentially significant impact or potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signature Printed Name Date For 43 13 010 P:\STAN\ea 98-375 chklist addend.wpd 2 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis) 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analysis are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. See the sample question below. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 7. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different ones. t�1 Oil P:\STAN\ea 98-375 chklist addend.wpd 3 Addendum to EA 98-375 Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Stan Sawa 760-777-7125 4. Project Location: Northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Lundin Development Co. 16400 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 207 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 6. Existing General Plan Designation: Community Commercial (CC) 7. Existing Zoning: Community Commercial (CC) 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) This Environmental Checklist and associated addendum review a Specific Plan amendment for 12.5 net acre shopping center at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings. The project site is currently vacant. Lands surrounding the project site are also generally vacant, with scattered single family residential. The approved Rancho La Quinta Residential Specific Plan occurs to the north of the proposed site. 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement). City of Indio - for street encroachment permits 4 :3 ail P:\STAN\ea 98-375 chkfist addend.wpd 1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Planning X Transportation/Circulation X Public Services Population and Housing X Biological Resources X Utilities and Service Systems X Geological Problems Energy and Mineral Aesthetics X Water Hazards X Cultural Resources X Air Quality X Noise I I Recreation Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. AN ADDENDUM TO THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a potentially significant impact or potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signature Printed Name Date For 4 3„ 013 P:\STAN\ea 98-375 chklist addend.wpd 2 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis) 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3: "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analysis are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. See the sample question below. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 7. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different ones. 43 014 P:\STAN\ea 98-375 chklist addend.wpd 3 Samnle auestion: Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Mitigated Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: Landslides or mudslides? (1,6) X (Attached source list explains that 1 is the general plan, and 6 is a USGS topo map. This answer would probably not need further explanation.) I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? X (General Plan Land Use Map) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies X adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-1 ff.) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? X (General Plan Land Use Map, General Plan Goal 2-2, page 2-11) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts X to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.1-4, page 4-15) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an X established community (including a low-income or minority community)? (Aerial Photograph) II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population X projections? (General Plan Land Use and Zoning Maps) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or X indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension or major infrastructure)? (General Plan Goal 2-3, Objective 2-3.1, and policies 2-3.1.1, 2-3.1.3, page 2-14) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable X housing? (Aerial Photograph) III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.2-3, page X 4-35) b) Seismic ground shaking? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 X ff., General Plan, Exhibit EH-1) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (General X Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.2-3, page 4-35 and page 4-30 ff.) P:\STAN\ea 98-375 chklist addend.wpd �e 015 d) Seiche, tsunami or volcanic hazard? (General Plan EIR, X page 4-30 ff.) e) Landslides or mudflows? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 X ff.) f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil X conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (General Plan EIR, page 4-41) g) Subsidence of the land? (General Plan EIR, page 4-43) X h) Expansive soils? (General Plan EIR, page 4-40 to 43) X i) Unique geologic or physical features? (General Plan, X page 8-7) IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface runoff? (Specific Plan document, X Section 2.30) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards X such as flooding? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.3-1, page 4-53) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of X surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (Specific Plan document Section 2.30, letter from CVWD dated 2/17/99.) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water X body? (Specific Plan document Section 2.30, letter from CVWD dated 2/17/99) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water X movements? (General Plan EIR, page 4-51 ff.) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? X (General Plan EIR, page 4-55 ff.) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (General Plan EIR, X page 4-57 ff.) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater X otherwise available for public water supplies? (General Plan EIR, page 4-57 ff.) V. AIR QUALITY Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an X existing or projected air quality violation? (General Plan EIR, page 4-171 ff., Air Quality Report for TPM 29052, Air Quality Report for TTM 29053, Synectecology, 11/5/98) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (Aerial X Photograph, Air Quality Report for TPM 29052, Air Quality Report for TTM 29053, Synectecology, 11/5/98) 0 i P:\STAN\ea 98-375 chklist addend.wpd 5 016 c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause X any change in climate? (General Plan MEA, page 5-33 ff.) d) Create objectionable odors? (Specific Plan Project X Description) VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (General X Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff.) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp X curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Specific Plan Site Plan and page 17) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? X (Specific Plan Site Plan; TTM 29053) d) Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site? X (Specific Plan Site Plan) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? X (Specific Plan Site Plan) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative X transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Specific Plan Consistency with General Plan, page 1) g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (General Plan X MEA) VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats X (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.4-1, page 4-69, and page 4-71 ff.) b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)? X (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.4-1, page 4-69) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak forest, X coastal habitat, etc.)? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.4-1, page 4-69) d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal pool)? X (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.4-1, page 4-69) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? General Plan X EIR, page 4-71 ff.) VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? X (General Plan MEA, page 5-26 ff.) O 1( P:\STAN\ea 98-375 chklist addend.wpd b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and X inefficient manner? (General Plan MEA, page 5-26 ff.) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral X resource that would be of future value to the region and the IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous X substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? (Specific Plan Project Description; TTM 29053) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan X or emergency evacuation plan? (General Plan MEA, page 6-27 ff.) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health X hazard? (Specific Plan Project Description; TTM 29053) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential X health hazards? (Specific Plan Project Description; TTM 29053) e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, X grass, or trees? X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (Noise Study for the X Construction and Operation of Commercial Land Uses on Tentative Parcel Map 29052, Synectecology, 11/5/98; General Plan MEA, page 6-15 ff., Exhibit 6-4) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (General X Plan MEA, page 6-15 ff., Exhibit 6-4) XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff.) X b) Police protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff.) X c) Schools? (General Plan MEA, page 4-9) X d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X (General Plan MEA, pages 3-3, 4-7) e) Other governmental services? (General Plan MEA, page X 4-14 ff.) XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (General Plan MEA, page 4-26) X b) Communications systems? (General Plan MEA, page X 4-29) 44 �J P:\STAN\ea 98-375 chklist addend.wpd 7 018 c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution X facilities? (General Plan MEA, page 4-20) d) Sewer or septic tanks? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24) X e) Storm water drainage? (General Plan MEA, page 4-27) X f) Solid waste disposal? (General Plan MEA, page 4-28) X g) Local or regional water supplies? (General Plan MEA, X page 4-20) XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (General Plan X Exhibit CIR-5) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? (General X Plan EIR, page 5-12 ff.) c) Create light or glare? (Specific Plan Project Description) X XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? (Paleontologic X Assessment Tentative Parcel Map #29052 and Tentative Tract #29053, Paleontologic Resource Assessment Program, 2/99) b) Disturb archaeological resources? (Cultural Resource X Report Tentative Parcel Maps No. 29052 & 29053, 11/14/98; Archaeological Testing and Site Evaluation on Tentative Tract 29053, 4/6/99) c) Affect historical resources? (Cultural Resource Report X Tentative Parcel Maps No. 29052 & 29053, 11/14/98) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which X would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (Cultural Resource Report Tentative Parcel Maps No. 29052 & 29053, 11/14/98; Archaeological Testing and Site Evaluation on Tentative Tract 29053, 4/6/99) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the X potential impact area? (Cultural Resource Report Tentative Parcel Maps No. 29052 & 29053, 11/14/98) XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks X or other recreational facilities? JTM 29053) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (General X Plan, Exhibit PR-1) 019 P:\STAN\ea 98-375 chklist addend.wpd XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality X of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare to endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, X to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually X limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Does the project have environmental effects which will X cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVII. EARLIER ANALYSIS. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. �T I I I b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. P:\STAN\ea 98-375 chklist addend.wpd Addendum to Revised Environmental Checklist, EA 98-375 (January, 2002) I. b) The General Plan and Zoning designations for the proposed site are currently Community Commercial, as are lands immediately adjacent to the west and north. The proposed project consists of a neighborhood shopping center with a supermarket anchor and associated retail development, including independent pads adjacent to the streets bordering the project. The project proposes a floor area ratio of 0.20, well below that allowed under the Community Commercial designation. The project will serve the rapidly developing residential neighborhoods, primarily to the west. Although the project is less intense than the type of commercial development envisioned for the site, it is nonetheless compatible with nearly designations which allow for low density residential development, and will serve this development when it occurs. No mitigation is therefore required. Ill.f) The project falls within an area of soils at risk for erosion. The proposed Specific Plan, in and of itself, will not cause a hazard. However, construction of the project will have the potential to create unstable soil conditions during earth moving activities. At such time as any phase of the project is proposed for development, the project proponent will be required to submit soils analysis to the City Engineer for review and approval. The recommendations contained in this study will reduce the potential impact from erosion of soils to a level of insignificance. Ill.b) & c) The proposed commercial project occurs in a Zone III groundshaking zone, approximately one quarter mile east of an inferred and inactive fault. The project site can expect to experience significant groundshaking in the event of a major earthquake in the Coachella Valley. In order to mitigate the potential impacts of groundshaking on buildings throughout the City, the Building Department has implemented the Uniform Building Code, as amended, which requires reinforced construction in groundshaking zones. The project does not occur in an area prone to liquefaction, and its distance from an active fault makes ground rupture unlikely. The project will be required to meet or exceed the City's building standards, thereby reducing the potential impact from groundshaking hazards to a level of insignificance. III. f) The project site occurs within the City's blowsand hazard area. Soils at the project site have a high potential for wind erosion. The project proponent will be required to submit, for a review and approval by the City Engineer, a PM 10 management plan which meets the requirements for such plans, prior to approval of the first grading permit for the site. Mitigation measures to ensure the stabilization of soils may include, but should not be limited to, soil cement or re -vegetation of any portion of the site not immediately under construction 1 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\LundinAddend.WPD ` c.% � 0 � or re -vegetation of any portion of the site not immediately under construction after grading; frequent watering, including watering during the evening and weekends during significant wind events; street sweeping or washing during construction; and the chemical stabilization of unpaved construction roadways. The implementation of such a plan will reduce the potential impacts of soil erosion at the project site to a level of insignificance. IV.a) The construction of any project on vacant land reduces the potential land available for the absorption of surface water, and changes surface water runoff. The proposed project has proposed, in conformance with the City Engineer's requirements for the retention of the 100 year storm event on site, the construction of retention basins along the entire site frontage on Jefferson Street. The retention basins shall be designed to meet the City's standards for such structures, and shall be incorporated into the landscaping concept for the proposed project. The retention basins will provide for the absorption of water, and reduce this potential impact. The basins will also control the flow of storm water generated on the site, and will reduce the potential impacts to an insignificant level. Revised Project: The project proponent has submitted changes in the proposed drainage plan which will require that the retention basins be increased in size, and infringe on the landscaped setback on Jefferson Street. The City standard for parkway landscaping requires that the retention of drainage occur outside the minimum setback areas. The requested reduction in standards is due to the elimination of proposed dry wells from the drainage plan, and an error in percolation made by the project engineer in calculating capacity of the drainage areas. In the Specific Plan, the applicant is able to vary from City standards. The project proponent has therefore requested a Specific Plan Amendment to allow the use of the Jefferson Street parkway landscaping for retention areas. The design proposed would result in swales located adjacent to the sidewalk with a depth of up to 6 feet. The proposed slope would not exceed 3:1. This design poses a potential hazard insofar as the slope of the swale will be relatively steep in some areas of the frontage. The applicant has prepared landscaping plans in conjunction with the change in drainage plan. The landscaping plan show typical details for plantings along the edge of the sidewalk. These plants are proposed to be 2 to 4 feet in height at 5 year maturity. Such a planting area must be sufficient to clearly separate the sidewalk from the swale edge from its installation. In order to ensure that a pedestrian does not risk falling due to the slope that will be required on the swales, the following mitigation measure is required: 1. Plantings immediately adjacent to the sidewalk shall be required along the west side of the sidewalk on Jefferson Street. Such plantings shall be one foot high at installation, and shall be of sufficient density to clearly 4 �� define the edge, and to fill into a hedge within one year of installation. 022 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\LundinAddend.WPD IV. c) Impermeable surfaces within the proposed project can increase the potential for pollutants to occur in surface water at the site. The site will drain to retention basins along Jefferson Street. The retention basins are required, in order to meet City standards, to include filtration devices or other methods to ensure that water being absorbed into the ground does not contain pollutants or other foreign materials. The drainage system shall be required to meet the standards established by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), as implemented by the City. The implementation of this program will reduce impacts to a level of insignificance. V.a) & b) An air quality analysis was prepared for buildout of the proposed project' . The air quality analysis was performed for both construction (short term) and operational (long term) emissions from the project site. The analysis utilized the threshold criteria established for the Valley by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, as required by the Air Quality Management Plan. The project will exceed threshold criteria for Nox and ROG during the construction period, and will exceed thresholds for operational emissions of CO, Nox and ROG. As recommended in the air quality analysis, the project proponent shall be required to implement the following mitigation measures: • All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition, and shall be properly serviced and repaired as needed. • Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit, the project proponent shall demonstrate, or cause to be demonstrated to the Community Development Department that all construction equipment to be utilized shall be low emission, or how the use of low emission construction equipment is infeasible. • Low VOC paints, primers and coatings shall be required for all buildings on the project site. All paints shall be applied using either a high volume/low pressure spray or by hand. • The proposed project shall provide a bus turnout, shelter and associated improvements on Jefferson Street and on Avenue 50, unless Sunline Transit provides written confirmation that no such turnout(s) or shelters are needed. "Air Quality Report for Construction and Operation of Commercial Land Uses on Tentative Parcel Map 29052 in the City of La Quinta, CA." Synectecology, November 5, 1998. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\LundinAddend.WPD 023 • As required by the Municipal Code, the businesses operating within the proposed project shall conform to the Transportation Demand Management requirements in place at the time they begin operation. • Deliveries to the project site shall occur during off-peak periods. Even with the implementation of these mitigation measures, the impacts to air quality from the proposed project could be significant. The air quality analysis does not, however, make appropriate reductions for pass -by trips, which will reduce the number of vehicles which come and leave the site; improvements in technology which are likely to reduce impacts, particularly from motor vehicles; or the transit route improvements in the future. Finally, the proposed project falls within the anticipated land use studied in the General Plan EIR. The City determined at that time that air quality impacts required a Statement of Overriding Considerations, which determined, as regarded air quality, that the impacts to air quality of development of the Plan would be cumulative only when considered in conjunction with regional development, and that the City would implement all feasible measures to reduce emissions within its boundaries. The implementation of the proposed project, therefore, is not expected to have a significant impact on air quality resources. VI.a) The proposed project represents a reduction in the potential square footage possible under the General Plan designation of Community Commercial which occurs for this site. The total number of trips likely to occur at the site, including pass -by trips, is expected to be less than that anticipated in the General Plan EIR. The proposed project, therefore, should not represent a significant impact on traffic and circulation. Vl.b) Access to the proposed project has been limited to two driveways each on Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. One additional access point is provided at the northeastern corner of the project, to allow for direct access from adjacent future development. Access drives and project circulation do not generally pose a hazard, with one exception, discussed below. The proposed project includes a drive, approximately 305 feet west of Jefferson on Avenue 50 which allows only 50 feet of stacking, well below the City's standard of 90 feet. Furthermore, the drive is flanked on two sides by parking stalls, and an internal intersection which is not at 90 degrees. This access point represents a potentially hazardous condition for motorists within the proposed project. The following mitigation shall be implemented to reduce the impact of this hazards to a less than significant level: G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\LundinAddend.WPD 024 • The proposed site plan shall be redesigned to provide at least 90 feet of stacking at the access point located approximately 305 feet west of Jefferson Street on Avenue 50. If the standard cannot be met, the access point shall be eliminated. Revised Project: The Specific Plan Amendment includes the addition of two driveways on the Avenue 50 frontage. The first is located at the western property line, and is proposed for emergency exit only. The driveway has been requested by the Fire Department. The driveway is proposed to be 26 feet in width, and available for right turns only. In order to ensure that no conflict exists and the purpose of the driveway is clear, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1. A sign reading "Wrong Way, Do Not Enter" shall be posted immediately east of the emergency egress drive in a format and location satisfactory to the City Engineer. The second driveway is proposed approximately 90 feet westerly of the emergency access driveway, to serve pads A and B. This driveway is located approximately 200 feet west of the next driveway, which will serve as primary access point on Avenue 50. The driveway is proposed to allow right-in/right-out only. The distance provided within the site for stacking is insufficient to meet City standards, but a deceleration lane has been provided. The deceleration lane begins immediately east of the next driveway. The separation appears to be sufficient to allow safe traffic movements on Avenue 50, as traffic enters and leaves the travel lanes. No mitigation measures are required. VI.f) The proposed Specific Plan allows for 536 parking stalls, a 21 % increase over the standard of 444 spaces required by the Zoning Ordinance. No justification is provided in the Specific Plan for such an increase. No analysis of the potential for shared parking facilities is provided. The provision of such a large percentage of additional parking spaces may have a negative impact on the aesthetic value of the site. Those portions of the site which are taken up by additional parking spaces could be landscaped, and provide additional visual interest to the site. It can be estimated that the additional parking spaces represent approximately 37,000 square feet, or .85 acre which could be dedicated to landscaped areas. Finally, the additional parking spaces do not further the General PlanIspolicies regarding alternative modes of transportation. In order to mitigate these impacts, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\LundinAddend.WPD '!,) 025 • The project proponent shall provide, as part of the Site Development Permit, a justification for the additional parking spaces shown in the Specific Plan, and shall reduce the number of parking spaces and enhance the project landscape plan wherever possible. • The Site Development Permit application shall include the provision of secure bicycle racks at selected locations within the project, to facilitate alternative transportation to and from the site. Vll.a) & b) The proposed Specific Plan occurs within the boundaries of the Coachella Valley fringe -toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Fee Area. The Specific Plan will not, in and of itself, have an impact on this habitat. However, eventual development of the site will impact this resource. With the adoption of a Habitat Conservation Plan for this species, payment of a $600.00 fee was established as mitigation for any taking of this endangered species. The site is not within the habitat areas for other species of concern in the City. No further mitigation is necessary. X.a) & b) A site -specific noise analysis was prepared for the proposed project'. Both Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 are currently impacted, and exceed 60 dBA CNEL. All new development is required to mitigate to the City's standards for noise, as required in the General Plan (Table EH-1). The development of commercial land uses requires an exterior noise level not exceeding 75 dBA CNEL. The noise levels within the project site will not exceed the City standard at buildout. Short term noise impacts can be expected during the construction phase of the project, as detailed in the report. In order to reduce potential impacts, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: • All construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7.00 a.m. To 7.00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, except in the case of an emergency which endangers the public health, safety or welfare. • All internal combustion equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers. • All stationary equipment shall be located as far as practical from adjacent residential units. • All on -site deliveries shall be limited to 7.00 a.m. To 10.00 p.m. 2 "Noise Study for the Construction and Operation of Commercial Land Uses on Tentative Parcel Map 29052 in the City of La Quinta, CA." Synectecology, November 5, 19998. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\LundinAddend.WPD 026 Xlll.a) Xlll.c) • The proposed perimeter wall shall be 8 feet in height. These mitigation measures will reduce impacts from noise to a less than significant level. The proposed Specific Plan and Parcel Map occur on a Primary Image Corridor (Jefferson Street) and a Secondary Image Corridor (Avenue 50). This designation requires added setbacks and enhanced landscaping treatments to mitigate potential aesthetic impacts. The proposed project will conform to the standards and requirements of the Primary and Secondary Image Corridor by providing the increased setbacks. This is expected to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. The proposed project will operate during the evening hours. Lands immediately west and north of the site are also currently designated Community Commercial and are vacant. The proposed project could impact Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street with added light or glare, which could have a negative impact on passing traffic. The City has implemented, through its Site Development Permit and building permit processes, standards which require lighting to be contained, and at a low level, to preserve the dark night sky. These standards will be implemented for this project, thereby reducing the potential impacts to a less than significant level. XIV. a) A paleontological assessment was completed for the proposed project3. The study found lacustrine sediments, consistent with ancient Lake Cahuilla and the type of sediment in which fossils are often found, on the project site. In order to mitigate the potential impacts to this non-renewable resource, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: • A qualified paleontologic monitor shall be on -site during any and all excavation of the proposed project. The monitor will be empowered to stop or divert excavations to allow for removal of abundant or large specimens. • All recovered specimens shall be professionally prepared, identified and preserved. • All recovered specimens shall be professionally curated into a museum repository with permanent retrievable storage. "Paleontologic Assessment Tentative Parcel Map #29052 (Commercial) and Tentative Tract $#29053 (Residential)." Paleontological Resource Assessment Program, revised February 1999. A►-� `f :) 02 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\LundinAddend.WPD • The paleontological monitor shall prepare a report of findings, including an appended inventory of specimens for submittal to the City. XIV.b) & d) An archaeological resource analysis, as well as site investigation, were prepared for the project site'. Two sites of potential significance were found for the project site. The two sites were excavated, and were determined not to meet the CEQA criteria for significance. Artifacts were collected and removed from the surface. The results of test pits indicate a low potential sensitivity for subsurface artifacts. No further mitigation is required for these flat areas. A large mound located along the property boundary on Avenue 50 is to be graded for construction of the project site. In order to ensure that no sub -surface artifacts occur at this location, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: • The project proponent shall provide a qualified archaeological monitor during any excavation of the large mound at the southern boundary of the project. The monitor shall be empowered to stop of divert excavation should artifacts be located. The monitor shall file a final report of findings with the City. These mitigation measures shall reduce the potential impacts to a level of insignificance. aP. . "Cultural Resources Report,Tentative Parcel Maps No. 29052 & 29053." 4 CRM Tech, December 14, .J 1998. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\LundinAddend.WPD 028 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPALS AND GUIDELINES FOR A 100,500 SQUARE FOOT SHOPPING CENTER CASE NO.: SPECIFIC PLAN 98-034, AMENDMENT #1 LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta did on the 19th day of February, 2002, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of Lundin Development Company for approval of an Amendment to the Specific Plan design and development standards and design guidelines for a 100,500 square foot shopping center, located at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue, more particularly described as: Portions of Section 32, TSS, R7E, SBBM WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta did on the 11 th day of December, 2001, and the 8th day of January, 2002, hold duly -noticed Public Hearings to consider the request of Lundin Development Company for approval of an Amendment to the Specific Plan design and development standards and design guidelines for a 100,500 square foot shopping center, located at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and 50th Avenue and by adoption of Resolution 2002-006, recommended approval of this Amendment request; and WHEREAS, said Specific Plan Amendment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-68), in that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Specific Plan 98-034 was certified by the City Council on May 18, 1999, in conjunction with General Plan Amendment 98-060, Zone Change 98-089, Specific Plan 98-034, Parcel Map 29052, and Tentative Tract Map 29053. An addendum to the Environmental Assessment (EA 98-373) has been prepared for this amendment and certified; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts and reasons to approve the Specific Plan Amendment: 1 . The Specific Plan, as amended, is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan in that the property is designated for community commercial uses, is under the floor area ratio maximum of .30, and will meet the daily needs of a multi -neighborhood area. � J'14 I P:\STAN\sp 98-034 am #1 cc res.wpd 029 Resolution No. 2002- Specific plan 98-034, Amendment #1 Lundin Development Company Adopted: Page 2. The Specific Plan, as amended, subject to conditions will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare in that development allowed under the Specific Plan is compatible with existing uses and development standards contained in the Specific Plan will ensure high quality development. 3. The amended Specific Plan will provide land use compatibility with zoning on adjacent properties in that the project principles and guidelines ensure that the proposed adjacent residential uses will not be negatively impacted and will service those uses. 4. The Specific Plan property is suitable and appropriate in that it easily assessable to surrounding neighborhoods, and is adjacent to two arterial streets. An Addendum to the Environmental Assessment (EA 98-373) has been prepared and has been certified. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve the above -described amendment request for the reasons set forth in this Resolution, subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 19th day of February, 2002, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 4D 030 P:\STAN\sp 98-034 am #1 cc res.wpd Resolution No. 2002- Specific plan 98-034, Amendment #1 Lundin Development Company Adopted: Page ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON , City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 031 P:\STAN\sp 98-034 am #1 cc res.wpd CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- SPECIFIC PLAN 98-034, AMENDMENT #1 LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED FEBRUARY 19, 2002 GENERAL 1. Upon the City Council's conditional approval of this Specific Plan, the City Clerk shall prepare and record with the Riverside County Recorder, a memorandum noting that the conditions of approval for the development of this property exist and are available for review at the City Hall. 2. The developer agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Specific Plan. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the developer of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary permits and/or clearances from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvement plans for City approval. 4. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq., La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Quality Resources Control Board's ("SWQRCB") Order No. 99-08-DWQ. P:\STAN\sp 98-034 am#1 cc coa.wpd Page 1 of 14 Q32 Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1 Lundin Development Company Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: February 19, 2002 A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs five (5) acres or more of land, or that disturbs less than five (5) acres of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than five (5) acres of land, the Permittee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020, LQMC): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All of applicant's erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off site grading being done in relation to this project. F. All approved project BMPs shall be maintained throughout the course of construction, and until all improvements have been accepted by the City. 5. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). PROPERTY RIGHTS 6. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. -) 5 �, 033 P:\STAN\sp 98-034 am#1 cc coa.wpd Page 2 of 14 Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1 Lundin Development Company Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: February 19, 2002 7. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. Unless it can be documented that the existing right-of-way complies with the following requirements, right-of-way dedications required for this development shall include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) from 60-foot to 72-foot half width to accommodate the present Jefferson Street improvements, including right and left turn lanes at its intersection with Avenue 50. 2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) - 50-foot half of the 100-foot right-of- way. 3) Additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. The applicant shall provide an additional 9-foot of right-of-way on Avenue 50 to accommodate the deceleration lane into the 30-foot wide parking lot entry into Albertsons. Such right-of-way shall be concentric with the deceleration curb alignment. 8. Right-of-way geometry for standard knuckles and property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801, and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 9. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street right-of-ways shown on the approved tentative parcel map are necessary prior to approval of the Parcel Map dedicating such right-of-ways, the applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-ways within 60 days of a written request by the City. 10. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public right-of- ways as follows: A. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) - 20-foot from the R/W-P/L. B. Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) - 20-foot from the R/W-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. 4 J 034 P:\STAN\sp 98-034 am#1 cc coa.wpd Page 3 of 14 Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1 Lundin Development Company Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: February 19, 2002 The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Parcel Map. 11. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Parcel Map. 12. The applicant shall vacate all abutter's right -of -access to public streets and properties from all frontages along such public streets and properties, excepting those access points shown on the Parcel Map. 13. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 14. When an applicant proposes the vacation, or abandonment, of any existing right- of-way, or access easement, which will diminish the access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall provide an alternate right-of-way or access easement, to those properties, or notarized letters of consent from the affected property owners. 15. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the tentative parcel map and the date of recording of any Parcel Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these conditions of approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 16. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and landscape architects, as appropriate. Plans shall be submitted on 24" x 36" media in the categories of "Rough Grading," "Precise Grading," "Streets & Drainage," and "Landscaping." All plans except precise grading plans shall have signature blocks for the City Engineer. Precise grading plans shall have signature blocks for Community Development Director and the Building Official. Plans are not approved for construction until they are signed. �'� P:\STAN\sp 98-034 am#1 cc coa.wpd Page 4 of 14 035 Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1 Lundin Development Company Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: February 19, 2002 "Streets and Drainage" plans shall normally include signals, sidewalks, bike paths, gates and entryways, and parking lots. "Landscaping" plans shall normally include irrigation improvements, landscape lighting and perimeter walls. Plans for improvements not listed above shall be in formats approved by the City Engineer. In addition to the normal set of improvement plans, a "Site Development" plan and a "Site Utility" plan are required to be submitted for approval by the Building Official and the City Engineer. "Site Development" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements. "Site Utility" plans shall normally include all sub -surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to sewer lines, water lines, fire protection and storm drainage systems. The "Site Utility" plan shall have signature blocks for the Building Official and the City Engineer. 17. The City maintains standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City resolution, the applicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes from the City. 18. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a utilize standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format which can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS P:\STAN\sp 98-034 am#1 cc coa.wpd 46 Page 5of14 036 Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1 Lundin Development Company Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: February 19, 2002 19. Prior to the conditional approval of this Specific Plan, or the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 20. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monuments. 21. When improvements are to be secured through a SIA, and prior to any permits being issued by the City, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on and off -site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution, or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit costs be approved by the City Engineer. At the time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for conditional approval of the Parcel Map by the City Council, the applicant shall also submit one copy each of an 8-1/2 if x 11 " reduction of each page of the Parcel Map, along with a copy of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " Vicinity Map. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. Development -wide improvements shall not be agendized for final acceptance by the City Council until the City receives confirmation from the telephone authority that the applicant has met all requirements for telephone service to all lots within the development. 'AW P:\STAN\sp 98-034 am#1 cc coa.wpd Page 6 of 14 037 Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1 Lundin Development Company Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: February 19, 2002 22. When improvements are phased through an administrative approvals (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off -site improvements and common improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall I be constructed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the occupancy of any permanent buildings in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the or occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In the event the applicant fails to construct improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 23. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 24. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, and C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on any final map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust 41 Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. P:\STAN\sp 98-034 am#1 cc coa.wpd Page 7 of 14 038 Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1 Lundin Development Company Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: February 19, 2002 25. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 26. The applicant shall minimize differences in elevation between the adjoining properties. DRAINAGE 27. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03 unless otherwise required in these conditions of approval: A. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. In residential developments, nuisance water shall be disposed of in a trickling sand filter and leach field approved by the City Engineer. The sand filter and leach field shall be designed to contain surges of, up to 3 gph/1,000 sq. ft. of landscape area, and infiltrate 5 gpd/1,000 sq. ft. B. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. C. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. UTILITIES 28. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 29. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 30. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. P:\STAN\sp 98-034 am#1 cc coa.wpd 46, Page 8 of 14 Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1 Lundin Development Company Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: February 19, 2002 The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 31. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan in accordance with the City's TDM Ordinance, Chapter 9.180, LQMC. The applicant shall be responsible for improvements found necessary to mitigate the traffic impacts of this development. 32. The applicant shall provide an additional 9-foot of right-of-way on Jefferson Street to accomodate the deceleration lane into the parking lot entry directly east of Parcel 6. Such right-of-way shall be concentric with the deceleration curb alignment. 33. The applicant shall revise the commercial entry drive throats to provide a minimum 90-foot uninterrupted length, or shall provide a combination of a dedicated right turn deceleration lane and the drive throat that will equal a total of 90-feet. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated as required in the "PROPERTY RIGHTS" section of these conditions. 34. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC, adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, and as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 35. Standard knuckles and corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 36. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations which convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue for street sweeping. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to normal curbing prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 37. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential & Parking Areas 3.0" a.c./4.50" a.b. Collector 4.0"/5.00" Secondary Arterial 4.0"/6.00" P:\STAN\sp 98-034 am#1 cc coa.wpd Page 9 of 14 040 Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1 Lundin Development Company Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: February 19, 2002 Primary Arterial 4.511/6.0011 Major Arterial 5.5 "/6.50" or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. A. PARKING LOTS 1) The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. 2) The angle point of the 26-foot drive aisle located at the northwest corner of Parcel 1, shall have an inside turning radius satisfactory to the Fire Marshall, and/or sufficient to accommodate a standard dual axel 13.5-foot wheel base fire truck. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 38. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Primary Entry (Jefferson Steet, 320-foot S. of N. P/L): Left/Right turn in, Right turn out. B. Secondary Entry (Jefferson Steet, 530-foot S. of N. P/Q: Right turn in, Right turn out. C. Primary Entry (Avenue 50, 610-foot W. of C/L Intersection with Jefferson Street): Left/Right turn in, Right turn out. D. Secondary Entry (Avenue 50, 400-foot W. of C/L Intersection with Jefferson Street): Right turn in, Right turn out. E. Secondary Entry into Parcel 2 Parking area (Avenue 50, 810-foot W. of C/L Intersection with Jefferson Street): Right turn in, Right turn out. F. Secondary Entry (Avenue 50, 930-foot W. of C/L Intersection with Jefferson Street): Shall be reserved for Emergency Vehicle Right turn in, Right turn out, and shall have positive access control satifactory to the Fire Marshal and the City Engineer. G. The access shown to the north, for the future residential tract shall remain. 460 P:\STAN\sp 98-034 am#1 cc coa.wN Page 10 of 14 041 Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1 Lundin Development Company Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: February 19, 2002 39. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 40. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 41. Standard knuckles and corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 42. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements. CONSTRUCTION 43. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 44. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential tracts are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the tract or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPING 45. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. P:\STAN\sp 98-034 am#1 cc coa.wpd Page 11 of 14 ^ Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1 Lundin Development Company Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: February 19, 2002 46. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit plans for approval by the Community Development Department prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking is complete, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner prior to submitting for signature by the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 47. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 18 inches of curbs long public streets. 48. Storm water will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The meandering public sidewalk adjacent to Pad "C" shall be moved closer to the street in order to allow up to three feet of berming, east of the adjacent retention basin. PUBLIC SERVICES 49. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by Sunline Transit and approved by the City Engineer. QUALITY ASSURANCE 50. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 51. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 52. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. After tributary -area improvements are complete and soils have been permanently stabilized where retention basins have been constructed, testing shall include sand filter percolation tests, as approved by the City Engineer. P:\STAN\sp 98-034 am#1 cc coa.wN Page 12 of 14 043 A3 Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1 Lundin Development Company Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: February 19, 2002 53. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all public improvement plans which were signed by the City Engineer. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City to reflect the as - built conditions. MAINTENANCE 54. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. FEES AND DEPOSITS 55. The applicant shall, pay the City's established fees for plan checking and construction inspection. Fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan checking and permits. 56. Prior to issuance of a grading permit or any earth moving activities, applicant shall pay a fringe -toed lizard mitigation fee of $600.00 per acre to the City of La Quinta. FIRE MARSHAL 57. Fire hydrants in accordance with CVWD Standard W-33 shall be located at each street intersection spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a fire hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 gpm for a two hour duration at 20 psi. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in the middle of the street directly in line with the fire hydrants. 58. Applicant/developer will provide written certification from the appropriate water company that the required fire hydrant(s) are either existing or that financial arrangements have been made to provide them. 59. Prior to issuance of first building permit, the applicant/developer will furnish one blueline copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review/approval. Plans will conform to the fire hydrant types, location, and spacing, and the system will meet the fire flow requirements. Plans will be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with 46 P:\STAN\sp 98-034 am#1 cc coa.wpd Page 13 of 14 0,44 ,44 Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1 Lundin Development Company Conditions of Approval - Recommended Adopted: February 19, 2002 the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." 60. The required water system including fire hydrants will be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. 61. The drive aisle paving at the rear of Pad "A" and "B" shall be designed to handle a live load of 65,000 pounds over 2-axles. SIGNS 62. The sign program in the specific plan is not considered approved. A separate sign program document shall be prepared, based upon the specific plan approval, with adequate detail provided to ensure compliance with applicable code requirements and design compatibility with the center. The document shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of the first building permit for the center. ENVIRONMENTAL 63. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit or any earth moving activities, whichever comes first, the property owner/developer shall prepare and submit a written report to the Community Development Department demonstrating compliance with those mitigation measures of SP 98-034 and EA 98-375. MISCELLANEOUS 64. The approved Specific Plan text on file in the Community Development Department, shall be revised to incorporate in the appropriate chapter and section the all conditions and mitigation measures, with final texts (4) submitted to the Community Development Department within 30 days of final approval by the City Council, or prior to issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs first. 65. A vehicle turnaround shall be provided in the parking lot north of the required emergency access located at the west end of the project on Avenue 50, to the satisfaction of the City. P:\STAN\sp 98-034 am#1 cc coa.wpd Page 14of14 045 ATTACHMENT #3 Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 2001 12. Commissioner But r asked if the clusters could be rotated. Mr. Walters explaine the second story was not a true story. It is more of an arc tectural feature. Discussion followed as to the construction d location of the two story units. Mr. Walters stated they d no objection. 13. Commissio er Tyler asked if the development on Kirk Street would back up o this project. He has a concern about setting a precede t that the Zoning Code governs over. 14./ae ssioner Butler stated this is normally an issue because there acent properties and in this instance thereare no adjacent Is this setting a precedent. Community Development r Jerry Herman stated the only affect is that once the first built, no matter which project is first, the property owner ilds a two story will allow the adjoining property owner to two story. Discussion followed regarding the affect of a ory unit on an adjoining property owner. 1 . There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-148, approving Site Development Permit 2001- 719, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: C. Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1; a request of Warner Engineering for Lundin Development Company for an amendment to the text development standards and design guidelines and an amendment to the site plan design adjacent to Avenue 50 for a 100,500 square foot shopping center located at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Robbins asked if the primary concern of staff was that no berming would be provided on the streetscape. Staff 4 ( ti G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC12-11-01.wpd 5 048 Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 2001 stated that is true. Commissioner Robbins asked the depth of the retention basins. Staff stated it is approximately five or six feet deep. 3. Commissioner Kirk asked if there were any standards in terms of the number of curb cuts for access on commercial projects like this or is it a decision made by staff. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated the General Plan requires it to be a minimum, which is a judgement call of staff. If the City Council and/or Planning Commission believes that what is being requested is too many, staff has reviewed it and determined it will work and it is not an unsafe situation. Staff has recommended eliminating the public access on the fourth access point requested by the applicant. The only minimum stated in the General Plan is how close they can be to a signalized intersection. Other than that staff indicates they should keep the driveways to a minimum. Commissioner Kirk stated one of the applicant's rationale for the increased number of accesses is the concentration of traffic on the previous access points. Staff stated this was a statement of the applicant. 4. Commissioner Butler asked if the fourth access would also be an access for the smaller pads. Would this close off truck traffic to service the smaller pads. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated those stores would be serviced from the front instead of the rear. 5. Commissioner Tyler questioned the number of driveways when you consider these as well as the adjacent tracts. Staff stated it is an issue before the Commission for their determination. Discussion followed regarding the access points. Commissioner Tyler questioned the gate at the north property line that would be gated to the tract. Staff stated a condition had been added not allowing the gate. 6. Commissioner Butler asked staff where the retention basins would go if not allowed in the setback. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated they would either lose parking spaces or work with the adjoining property owner to create the basin. 7. Commissioner Tyler asked if the sign program had been approved. Staff stated the applicant is conditioned to bring a final sign program back to the Community Development Department. ( J G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 12-11-01.wpd 6 049 Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 2001 Commissioner Tyler asked about the need for future expansion for right turns; is this still required? Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated this has already been acquired. 8. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Mike Smith, Warner Engineering, representing the applicant, explained their request. 9. Commissioner Tyler asked about the roadways in the rear of the buildings and why he thought the Fire Department would want to use it. Mr. Smith stated they had no objection to making it an emergency exit or right turn out. 10. Commissioner Butler questioned whether or not the landscape architect would be able to buffer the parking lot without berms. Mr. Smith stated he was proposing to use short walls and plant materials. Commissioner Butler stated the driveways could be obstructed by the landscaping plan. Commissioner Butler asked what the elevation was of the parking lot. Mr. Smith stated it was hard to read. 11. Commissioner Kirk asked about the concrete pipe. Mr. Smith stated this was a proposed solution if they could not use the retention basin in the landscape setback. Commissioner Kirk asked if the applicant knew about the deceleration upon the initial approval. Mr. Smith stated yes they did and it was given to the City. Commissioner Kirk asked if the percolation rate had changed. Mr. Smith stated it is less than what is contained in the soils report. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated the City's standard has always been 2-inches per hour maximum. Commissioner Kirk questioned why another access point was needed. Mr. Smith stated to accommodate the buildings in the "L" shaped area. 12. Mr. Greg Bever, Lundin Development, explained the purpose in regard to adding the accesses. Commissioner Kirk asked why the access to the east would not accommodate the shops instead of adding the additional access. Mr. Bever stated it would give better access to the pads. 13. Commissioner Robbins noted there is no deceleration lane for the main entrance off Avenue 50. There is a deceleration lane on the two smaller accesses and this seems backwards. Senior Engineer 4� G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC12-11-01.wpd 7 050 J0 Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 2001 Steve Speer stated the Municipal Code requires 90 feet of throat depth for an access to a parking lot. This particular site is constrained along its frontage making the site shallow front to back in several locations. As a result of not having the 90 feet, staff was allowing to use a deceleration lane. Staff noted they are not moving the right-of-way line which should be done as the City does not want the curb back of the right-of-way line. Staff considers this as an alternative and does believe it is being overused in this instance. It is not needed on the main entrance because the throat going into the parking lot is 90 feet. 14. Commissioner Tyler asked if the parking lot on the west end was employee parking. Mr. Bever stated it was. With regards to using the retention basin, it is a large economic repercussion for them. They do comply along Avenue 50 with the 20-foot landscaping setback. As far as a visual buffer for those traveling on Jefferson Street there is 60-feet of dense landscaping which will allow them the depth to provide visual screening. 15. Chairman Abels asked if anyone else would like to speak regarding this project. There being no further discussion, the public participation portion of the hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 16. Commissioner Robbins stated that conceptually he has no problem with the retention basin encroaching into the landscape setback. He is concerned with the northerly part of Jefferson street where the retention basin backs up to the two fast food pads, as they are not usually maintained. He would be more comfortable if they had a landscape plan the Commission could review. On the other hand he does not want to create a high water usage landscape plan. 17. Commissioner Kirk stated he also has a concern with the retention basin, but believes it could be resolved. On the access issue, there are too many curb cuts. If an emergency access is needed, then he cold support it as an exit only. Regarding the minor setback issue, he supports the applicant's request. 18. Commissioner Butler stated he concurs with the lack of detail on the landscape plan. If it were in more detail, he could probably agree with the retention basin request. In regard to the access, he G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC12-11-01.wpd 8 Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 2001 would agree with closing off the one on the western end and making it an emergency access only. This would still allow three accesses on Avenue 50 and three on Jefferson Street. 19. Commissioner Tyler stated the Specific Plan states on Page 12 that the trees will be mature in 15-20 years. He would like to see a more detailed landscaping plan before approving it. He does believe there is a need for all the access points as requested. Also, he would like to see the access in the rear of the pads eliminated. 20. Mr. Smith requested this project be continued to allow them time to bring a landscape plan back to the Commission. He noted the entry to the north to the tract will not be gated. 21. Commissioner Kirk suggested the applicant be given direction as to what to bring back. He needs to address the access points and prepare a landscape plan. Discussion followed regarding access points. 22. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Kirk to continued Specific Plan 98-034 , Amendment #1, to January 8, 2002, as requested by the applicant. Unanimously approved. C ' r„ . be'S Feeessed the meeting at 8:51 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:57 . . E. 08 a request of the City for certification of a Mitigated Negative Declar ion of Environmental Impact for an Environmental Assessment and consi ration of an amendment to the City's General Plan Circulation Element Ta e CIR-2 on Major Arterials to amend the minimum intersection sp ing of 2,600 feet for commercial frontage. 1. Chairman Ab opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Plann Consultant Nicole Criste, presented the information contain in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community De lopment Department. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC12-1 1-01.wpd 9 (1 5 r) ) d'- ATTACHMENT #4 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 A. Delete Condition #62. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. D. Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1; a request of Warner Engineering for Lundin Development Company for an amendment to the text development standards and design guidelines and an amendment to the site plan design adjacent to Avenue 50 for a 100,500 square foot shopping center located at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if the Commission had the authority to waive the requirement for the berming. Staff stated it is a Zoning Ordinance requirement but, under a Specific Plan the development standard can be modified. Commissioner Tyler asked if the right - out at the emergency gate on the westerly driveway not being included in the Specific Plan was an oversight or a reluctance of the applicant? Staff stated they did not know, but they are conditioned to install it. 3. Commissioner Butler asked about any alternatives to the berming. Staff stated the applicant's alternative is landscaping to provide the screening along with a wall next to the fast food restaurants. Commissioner Butler asked if the berming was a safety factor for traffic on Jefferson Street or aesthetics. Staff stated it was aesthetics. 4. Commissioner Kirk asked for background on the use of setbacks for retention. Staff explained the reasons and gave examples. Commissioner Kirk asked if staff had a recommendation on the number of accesses that should be allowed on Avenue 50, beyond the emergency access. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated staff has been scaling the distances between the driveways and it came r� G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-8-02.wpd 9 053 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 to 109 feet which is rather short. As a result, staff added Condition #38.E. eliminating the one access on the west end of the site on Avenue 50. 5. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Mike Smith, Warner Engineering representing the applicant, asked that Condition #48 be amended to delete the first two words and add "...shall be landscaped." Mr. Ray Lopez, Landscape Architect for the project, gave a presentation on the landscaping. 6. Commissioner Kirk asked if the applicant had been having any problems with the Palo Verde trees being pruned incorrectly because storefronts were being obscured by the landscaping in other centers. Mr. Lopez stated he had not seen any disappear but the problems have been with maintenance people not knowing how to prune the trees. It becomes a code enforcement issue. 7. Commissioner Tyler stated the trees can be butchered to the point of nonexistence. Mr. Lopez stated this is a problem. Commissioner Tyler stated there was a statement in the Specific Plan that the trees would reach maturity within 20-30 years and the plans show within five to six year. Mr. Lopez stated when mature, the Acacia species will be 25-feet and depending upon maintenance, fertilization, and watering they can reach that height in ten years. 8. Commissioner Robbins stated the retention basin at the southeast corner near Jefferson the retention basin comes right up to the base of the sidewalk, then the sidewalk, and then out toward Jefferson Street there is a wide band of grass, is there any reason the sidewalk needs to be so close to the slope. It seems it could be moved closer to the street. Mr. Lopez stated that would not be a problem. In that area, there is a slight berm. It could be meandered and berm Commissioner Robbins asked staff if that would resolve the issue. Staff stated they would need to see the plans first. Mr. Lopez stated they could get 1-4 feet in height in that section along Jefferson Street and meander the walkway. 9. Mr. Herb Lundin, owner of the project, stated that in regard to the fifth driveway it is to serve the customers for the end shops and staff determined the driveways to be safe. With regard to the 41 distance it is a safe distance, there is stacking and will be a lightly G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 10 0 5 4 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 used driveway, and will be a right turn -in and out. It is also consistent with the General Plan. 10. Commissioner Butler asked the location for the gas station and whether or not additional accesses would be needed. Mr. Smith stated it would be located on Pad E and they were not requesting any additional accesses to service the gas station. 11. Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment. There being no further public comment, the public participation portion of the hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 12. Commissioner Robbins stated he has no objection to the retention basin in the setback area. He would suggest the sidewalk on Jefferson Street be moved, meandered and as much berming as possible. He does not have any real concerns in regard to the driveway. 13. Commissioner Kirk stated he has no issue with the berming in the setback area, but has a concern with the process and fairness. If it is a City Code to have consistency in regard to Major Arterials in regard to aesthetics, then the Zoning Code should be changed to reflect this. He has a strong objection to using a specific plan to get rid portions of the Zoning Code that are problematic. This is a good project using the specific plan process to alleviate itself of an annoying requirement in the Zoning Code and for that portion he is not supportive of the request. In regard to accesses, he believes they should limit the number, and only allow two accesses on Avenue 50 with an emergency access. 14. Commissioner Butler stated he concurs with most of his statements, but also believes the applicant has addressed the issues raised by the Commission. He does not have any concern regarding the number accesses and would support their request for the third access, especially since the gas station would not be requesting any accesses. 15. Commissioner Tyler stated he agrees with most of the issues as they have been addressed. As to the third driveway, if it is eliminated it will increase traffic on the other accesses causing a greater circulation problem. f.' S G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 11 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 16. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-006 approving Specific Plan 98-034 Amendment #1, as amended. A. Condition #38.E.: Secondary Entry into Parcel 2 Parking area (Avenue 50, 810-foot W. of C/L Intersection with Jefferson Street): Right turn in, Right turn out. B. Condition #48: Storm water will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The meandering public sidewalk adjacent to Pad "C" shall be moved closer to the street in order to allow up to three feet of berming, east of the adjacent retention basin. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: Commissioner Kirk. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Chak-man ^ beIS re^^csed the meeting at 8:29 p.m. and reconvened at 8:35 p.m. E. Environmental Assessment 2001-437, General Plan Amendment 2001- 081, Zone Change 2001-104, Specific Plan 90-016 Amendment #1 and Tentative Tract Map 30357; a request of the Toll Brothers, Inc. for proval of an Environmental Assessment; a General Plan Amendment an Zone Change to change 14 acres at the northeastern corner of Jeff rson Street and Avenue 52 from Low Density Residential to Neigh orhood Commercial; a Specific Plan Amendment modifying standar s and guidelines for the construction of 490 single family residence 60 fractional ownership units, an 18 hole golf course and a 14 acre neig orhood shopping center; and a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide p tions of the project area into 178 residential lots, lots for future reside tial subdivision, casitas development, golf course, maintenance a clubhouse facility lots, and other lettered lots for streets and other cilities. 1. Chairman Abel opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planni g Consultant Nicole Criste, presented the information contai d in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community velopment Department. 2. Chairman Abels askedlif there were any questions of staff. 4 �. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 12 �5� V � 44 OF COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: February 19, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing on Development Impact Fees Continue the Public Hearing to March 5, 2002. None. None. None. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Continue the Public Hearing to March 5, 2002; or 2. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Roy F. Ste s4n, PE Interim Public rks Director/City Engineer AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese City Manager 4 g i TAPW DEPT\COU NOL\2002\020219b.wpd COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE:February 19, 2002 Joint Public Hearing Between the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency to Consider an Amendment to the Affordable Housing Agreement ("Agreement") By and Between the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency and DC & TC, LLC and to Consider the Issuance of up to $8,000,000 of Multi -Family Housing Revenue Bonds that Facilitate Development of a 118 Unit Senior Apartment Complex as Part of the Miraflores Neighborhood Located Northwest of the Jefferson Street and Avenue 48 Intersection RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Open the City Council/Agency Board joint public hearing and receive testimony regarding the Agreement. Close the public hearing and consider the following actions: City Council Action 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Amendment No. 1 to the Affordable Housing Agreement by and between the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency and Miraflores, L.P. Agency Actions 1. Adopt a Resolution of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency approving Amendment No.1 to the Affordable Housing Agreement to the Affordable Housing Agreement between the Agency and Miraflores, L.P. 2. Adopt a Resolution of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency approving and authorizing the issuance, sale and delivery of not to exceed $5,000,000 multifamily revenue bonds, authorizing the execution and delivery of the required documents, and taking actions necessary in connection with the authorization, issuance, sale and delivery of the bonds. G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\ccjhMiraF1stAmd.wpd 4 8 3. Adopt a Resolution of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency approving and authorizing the issuance, sale and delivery of not to exceed $3,000,000 multifamily revenue bonds, authorizing the execution and delivery of the required documents, and taking actions necessary in connection with the authorization, issuance, sale and delivery of the bonds. 4. Appropriate $1.95 million from Project Area No. 1 and Project Area No. 2 Housing and Bond funds unallocated reserves and transfer from existing line items $1.55 million for a total of $3.5 million toward this multifamily project. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The Agreement would result in the expenditure of an additional $3.5 million of Housing Fund revenue. To date, a total of $6.0 million has been appropriated for this development, allocated for land acquisition, off -site improvements, government and City fees, and architecture and engineering costs. This funding level was based upon the developer obtaining 9% investment tax credit financing. They instead received 4% investment tax credit financing that generates a reduced level of construction and permanent financing, thus requiring the additional Agency assistance. The additional $3.5 million would be funded through a combination of Project Area No. 1 ($225,207) and Project Area No. 2 ($60,150) Housing Bond funds; $200,000 from Housing Fund account 683 677; $350,000 from Housing Fund account 684 000; $1,000,000 from Housing fund account 684 500; $1,000,000 from the Project Area No. 2 Housing available fund balance; and $664,643 from Project Area No. 1 La Quinta Housing available fund balance. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Affordable Housing Agreement Amendment The Agency Board approved an Affordable Housing Agreement with DC & TC, LLC on November 21, 2000 that facilitated the construction of 118 senior apartment units at Miraflores. The Affordable Housing Agreement provided that the Agency would fund up to $6.0 million or 37% of the $16.1 million of development costs to generate 118 senior units affordable to very low and low income senior households. These units would remain affordable to these households for 55 years. The developer, DC & TC, LLC, proposed to fund the remaining $10.1 million of development costs through a combination of private financing, developer equity, and 9% Low and Moderate Income Tax Credit equity. The 9% Tax Credit equity was slated to fund $6.6 million or 65% of the $10.1 million. DC & TC, LLC applied for the 9% Tax Credits during the Spring 2001 round. Their application earned 149 out of a possible 153 eligible points. However, they did not receive a tax credit allocation. The only project to receive tax credits in Riverside County was a 166 unit family housing development in Palm Desert. rt 48.j 002 G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\ccjhMiraF1 stAmd.wpd In an effort to pursue a back-up financing strategy, DC & TC, LLC recommended applying for 4% Tax Credits during the October 2001 � round, and issuing multifamily revenue bonds to underwrite both the construction and permanent financing costs. On October 2, 2001 the Agency Board approved applying for 4% Tax Credits, and authorized staff to pursue the issuance of multifamily revenue bonds and to prepare the necessary amendments to the Affordable Housing Agreement in order to facilitate additional Agency funding. The Agreement facilitates the additional $3.5 million of Agency funding. These funds will finance the gap between what the permanent bond financing can support (the bond amount is based upon the rental income the development generates), and the tax credit equity the 4% Tax Credits generate. Under this scenario, the project's permanent financing will be as follows: Tax Exempt Bond $ 3,000,000 Agency Assistance 9,500,000 4% Tax Credit Equity 3,619,680 Total $16,1 19,680 By funding this amount, the Agency will facilitate the development of 118 senior apartment units that will be affordable to very low and low-income senior households. These units will remain affordable to said households for 55 years. The per unit assistance amount would be $80,508. This compares to per unit costs of $23,476 (Seasons Apartments) to $65,000 (Building Horizons). While the cost of this proposal is higher, the existing units were constructed in the mid-1990's when land and construction costs were lower. Further, the very -low income units do not feature the design or site amenity enhancements designated for the Miraflores senior apartments. These enhancements increase construction and development costs. The Agency has been pursuing affordable housing development in order to satisfy State planning and redevelopment law requirements. State planning laws require that cities facilitate development of the region's affordable housing needs. The City's Housing Element outlines the City's approach to meeting the City's needs. The Agency's affordable housing initiatives have been identified as the means to achieve a majority of this need. State Redevelopment Law provides that redevelopment agencies must expend 20% of their tax increment revenue to increase and improve the supply of affordable housing in their jurisdictions, and further, fund and facilitate projects that insure that at least 15 % of all new and substantially rehabilitated dwellings within an agency's project areas are affordable. If a redevelopment agency does not meet these mandates, then the State may encumber the redevelopment agency's revenue and contract with county and regional housing agencies to develop affordable housing within the redevelopment agency's project areas. The State enforces these mandates through audits conducted by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). 4 8 U: 3 G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\ccjhMiraF1stAmd.wpd In June 1999, the Agency adopted an updated Five Year Implementation Plan that identified the need to secure 1,798 covenant restricted affordable units by 2004. As of June 30, 2001, the Agency has secured 28% of this amount or 501 units. Bond Resolutions Attached to this report are two resolutions that approve and authorize the issuance of $5,000,000 and $3,000,000 of multifamily housing revenue bonds. In addition to approving and authorizing the issuance of these bonds, the resolutions also approve the bond documents and official statement, and authorize the appropriate parties to execute documents. These bonds are tax exempt financing secured only by the senior apartment development; they are not an obligation of the City of La Quinta or the Agency, and are not counted as part of the Agency's bonding capacity. They are being used in order to secure tax-exempt interest rates for both construction and permanent financing, reducing development and subsequent operating costs, and assisting in allowing rents affordable to very low and low-income senior households. The interest rate spread between tax exempt and taxable rates are approximately two points, and this generates a substantial interest cost savings over the life of the bonds. The Agency is authorized by federal and state statutes to issue these bonds because the provision of affordable housing is defined as a public purpose that redevelopment agencies are mandated to achieve. Two separate issues are being requested. Both the $5.0 million and the $3.0 million issues will be sold to fund construction activities. When construction is complete, the $5.0 million issue will be retired and the $3.0 million issue will remain in place as permanent financing. This structure is being pursued because the tax credit -financing program requires that no more than 50% of the construction financing can be funded by Agency funds. As such, only $5.0 million of the Agency assistance will be used during construction, with the remaining $4.5 million pledged when construction is complete and the tax credit equity is funded. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: City Council Action 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Amendment No. 1 to the Affordable Housing Agreement by and between the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency and Miraflores, L.P.; or 2. Withhold approval and provide staff with alternative direction. Agency Actions 1. Adopt a Resolution of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency approving Amendment No.1 to the Affordable Housing Agreement to the Affordable Housing Agreement between the Agency and Miraflores, L.P. v G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\ccjhMiraF1 stAmd.wpd 2. Adopt a Resolution of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency approving and authorizing the issuance, sale and delivery of not to exceed $5,000,000 multifamily revenue bonds, authorizing the execution and delivery of the required documents, and taking actions necessary in connection with the authorization, issuance, sale and delivery of the bonds. Adopt a Resolution of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency approving and authorizing the issuance, sale and delivery of not to exceed $3,000,000 multifamily revenue bonds, authorizing the execution and delivery of the required documents, and taking actions necessary in connection with the authorization, issuance, sale and delivery of the bonds. Appropriate $3.5 million from Project No. 1 and Project No. 2 Housing and Bond funds; or 3. Withhold approval and provide staff with further direction. Respectfully submitted, Xrif Herma)evelopment Co munity Director Approved for submission by, Thomas P. Genovese, Executive Director/City Manager Attachments: 1. Summary Report 2. First Amendment to Affordable Housing Agreement (Senior Apartments Development) The following documents are available for review in the City Clerk's office: 1. Trust Indenture between the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency and Trustee Relating to $5,000,000 La Quinta Redevelopment Agency Variable Rate Demand Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Miraflores Apartments) 2002 Series A, dated March 1, 2002 4� G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\ccjhMiraF1 stAmd.wpd 2. Assignment and Intercreditor Agreement by and among La Quinta Redevelopment Agency, a statutory redevelopment agency organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of California, Trustee and Fannie Mae, as their interests may appear, and acknowledged, accepted and agreed to by Miraflores, LP a California limited partnership, dated as of March 1, 2002. 3. $5,00,000 La Quinta Redevelopment Agency Variable Rate Demand Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Miraflores Apartments) 2002 Series A Financing Agreement. 4. Multifamily Note 5. LIHTC Agreement 6. Fannie Mae Rider to Regulatory Agreement 7. Assignment and Intercreditor Agreement 4 8 `11 r U- .1% t: 0 G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\ccjhMiraF1stAmd.wpd RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND MIRAFLORES, L.P. MIRAFLORES AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 1 WHEREAS, the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") and DC & TC, LLC ("Original Developer") entered into that certain Affordable Housing Agreement, dated on or about December 20, 2000, which Agreement was thereafter amended and assigned by Original Developer to Miraflores, L.P. ("Developer") by that certain Assignment and Assumption of Affordable Housing Agreement dated June 11, 2001, by and among Agency, Original Developer, and Developer (collectively, the "Agreement"); and WHEREAS, the Agency and Developer propose to enter into Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement ("Amendment No. 1 ") for the purpose of revising the amount of Agency financial assistance to the project described in the Agreement in order to conform to proposed bond financing for the project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33433, the Agency prepared a Summary Report concerning Amendment No. 1; and WHEREAS, a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Council of the City of La Quinta ("City Council" or "City" as appropriate) concerning Amendment No. 1 was duly noticed in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33433; and WHEREAS, on February 19, 2002, the Agency and City Council held a joint public hearing on the proposed Amendment No. 1; and WHEREAS, at the February 19, 2002, joint public hearing the Agency and City Council considered the staff report and all other information, testimony, and evidence presented with respect to the proposed Amendment No. 1; and WHEREAS, all actions required of the Agency and City Council to be taken precedent to review and consideration of Amendment No 1 by the Agency and City Council have been taken in accordance with applicable law; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta hereby resolves as follows: Section 1. The City Council finds and determines that: A. Amendment No. 1 will effectuate the purposes of the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code § 33000 et seq.) and the Redevelopment Plan for Project Area No. 2 by facilitating the development of affordable housing for senior citizens in the City of La Quinta, in that Amendment No. 1 provides additional funding from the Agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund for project costs 4 8 v G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\MFCCResoAmd 1.doc City Council Resolution 2002- Miraflores Affordable Housing Agreement Amendment #1 Adopted: February 19, 2002 that are necessary to assure a high quality development and provision of adequate housing amenities in the project, and in conformity with the Agency's proposed bond financing for the project. B. Amendment No. 1 is consistent with the Agency's adopted "Second Five -Year Implementation Plan Project Areas No. 1 and 2," adopted by the Agency in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33490, in that (i) the goals and objectives set forth in the Implementation Plan include increasing and improving the community's supply of affordable housing, and (ii) the project on the Site is specifically identified as one of the Agency's housing programs to be undertaken in the time period covered by the Implementation Plan. C. The highest and best use of the Site in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan is the development of the Site for affordable housing. To the extent the additional Agency financial assistance to the project set forth in Amendment No. 1 constitutes an additional amount of land write -down that affects the Agency's sale of the project site to the Developer as set forth in the Agreement, any additional land write -down that could be construed as resulting from the increased financial assistance provided by the Agency in Amendment No. 1 does not affect the prior finding that the consideration paid by the Developer for the Site is not less than the fair reuse value at its highest and best use in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan, for the reasons set forth in the Agency's Summary Report for Amendment No. 1 prepared in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33433, which Summary Report, a copy of which is on file with the Agency Secretary/City Clerk, is incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth. Section 2. Amendment No. 1, a copy of which is on file with the Agency Secretary/City Clerk, is hereby approved. Section 3. The City Council consents to the direction given by the Agency to its Executive Director authorizing and directing the Executive Director to make final, technical modifications to Amendment No. 1 consistent with the material provisions of Amendment No. 1 approved hereby, and to finalize the document for signature by the Agency Chairman, and further consents to the authorization and direction given by the Agency to its Chairman to thereafter sign Amendment No. 1 on behalf of the Agency. Section 4. The City Manager is authorized and directed to take such other and further actions and execute such other and further documents as may be necessary to implement and effect Amendment No. 1 and this Resolution on behalf of the City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 19th day of February, 2002, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 4,89 G AWPDOCS\CCReso-COA\MFCCResoAmd 1.doc City Council Resolution 2002- Miraflores Affordable Housing Agreement Amendment #1 Adopted: February 19, 2002 JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON , City Attorney 43 1 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\MFCCResoAmd 1.doc RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND MIRAFLORES, L.P. MIRAFLORES AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 1 WHEREAS, the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") and DC & TC, LLC ("Original Developer") entered into that certain Affordable Housing Agreement, dated on or about December 20, 2000, which Agreement was thereafter amended and assigned by Original Developer to Miraflores, L.P. ("Developer") by that certain Assignment and Assumption of Affordable Housing Agreement dated June 11, 2001, by and among Agency, Original Developer, and Developer (collectively, the "Agreement"); and WHEREAS, the Agency and Developer propose to enter into Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement ("Amendment No. 1 ") for the purpose of revising the amount of Agency financial assistance to the project described in the Agreement in order to conform to proposed bond financing for the project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33433, the Agency prepared a Summary Report concerning Amendment No. 1; and WHEREAS, a joint public hearing of the Agency and the City Council of the City of La Quinta ("City Council" or "City" as appropriate) concerning Amendment No. 1 was duly noticed in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33433; and WHEREAS, on February 19, 2002, the Agency and City Council held a joint public hearing on the proposed Amendment No. 1; and WHEREAS, at the February 19, 2002, joint public hearing the Agency and City Council considered the staff report and all other information, testimony, and evidence presented with respect to the proposed Amendment No. 1; and WHEREAS, all actions required of the Agency and City Council to be taken precedent to review and consideration of Amendment No. 1 by the Agency and City Council have been taken in accordance with applicable law; NOW, THEREFORE, the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency hereby resolves as follows: Section 1. The Agency finds and determines that: A. Amendment No. 1 will effectuate the purposes of the Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code § 33000 et seq.) and the Redevelopment Plan for Project Area No. 2 by facilitating the development of affordable housing for senior citizens in the City of La Quinta, in that Amendment No. 1 provides additional G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\MFAgResoAmd1.doc Resolution No. RA-2002- Miraflores Affordable Housing Agreement Amendment #1 Adopted: February 19, 2002 funding from the Agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund for project costs that are necessary to assure a high quality development and provision of adequate housing amenities in the project, and in conformity with the Agency's proposed bond financing for the project. B. Amendment No. 1 is consistent with the Agency's adopted "Second Five -Year Implementation Plan Project Areas No. 1 and 2," adopted by the Agency in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33490, in that (i) the goals and objectives set forth in the Implementation Plan include increasing and improving the community's supply of affordable housing, and (ii) the project on the Site is specifically identified as one of the Agency's housing programs to be undertaken in the time period covered by the Implementation Plan. C. The highest and best use of the Site in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan is the development of the Site for affordable housing. To the extent the additional Agency financial assistance to the project set forth in Amendment No. 1 constitutes an additional amount of land write -down that affects the Agency's sale of the project site to the Developer as set forth in the Agreement, any additional land write -down that could be construed as resulting from the increased financial assistance provided by the Agency in Amendment No. 1 does not affect the prior finding that the consideration paid by the Developer for the Site is not less than the fair reuse value at its highest and best use in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan, for the reasons set forth in the Agency's Summary Report for Amendment No. 1 prepared in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33433, which Summary Report, a copy of which is on file with the Agency Secretary/City Clerk, is incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth. Section 2. Amendment No. 1, a copy of which is on file with the Agency Secretary/City Clerk, is hereby approved. Section 3. The Executive Director of the Agency is authorized and directed to make final, technical modifications to Amendment No. 1 consistent with the material provisions of Amendment No. 1 approved hereby, and to finalize the document for signature by the Agency Chairman, and the Chairman is thereafter authorized and directed to sign Amendment No. 1 on behalf of the Agency. Section 4. The Executive Director of the Agency is authorized and directed to take such other and further actions and execute such other and further documents as may be necessary to implement and effect Amendment No. 1 and this Resolution on behalf of the Agency. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 19th day of February, 2002, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: to - G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\MFAgResoAmd 1.doc -2- Resolution No. RA-2002- Miraflores Affordable Housing Agreement Amendment #1 Adopted: February 19, 2002 TERRY HENDERSON, Chair City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, Agency Secretary City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON , Agency Counsel City of La Quinta, California J G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\MFAgResoAmd1 Am -3- RESOLUTION RDA NO. RESOLUTION OF THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF NOT TO EXCEED $5,000,000 MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS, (MIRAFLORES PROJECT) 2002 SERIES A; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AN INDENTURE OF TRUST, REGULATORY AGREEMENT, FINANCING AGREEMENT, OTHER AGREEMENTS, OFFICIAL STATEMENT, BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT, AND ALL NECESSARY AND RELATED DOCUMENTS AND ACTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUTHORIZATION, ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF THE BONDS RESOLVED, by the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") that: WHEREAS, this Agency has determined to issue revenue bonds of the Agency to -finance the acquisition and construction of multifamily housing pursuant to Chapter 8 of Part 1 of Division 24 of the Health & Safety Code of the State of California, (the "Act") and has determined to borrow money for such purpose by the issuance of revenue bonds as authorized by the Act in order to preserve low and moderate multifamily housing units provided by the Miraflores Apartments Project as (hereinafter defined); and WHEREAS Miraflores, L.P. (the "Developer") has requested the assistance of the Agency in relation to the issuance of bonds relating to the financing of the construction of a multifamily rental housing development that is known as Miraflores Apartments and located in La Quinta (the "Miraflores Apartments Project"); and WHEREAS, the Indenture of Trust, Regulatory Agreement, and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants, Fannie Mae Rider to Regulatory Agreement, Financing Agreement, Tax Certificate, Official Statement, Bond Purchase Agreement and other necessary and related agreements and documents in connection with the issuance, sale and delivery of the bonds have been presented and provided to this Board; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest and for the public benefit that the Agency issue, sell and deliver such Bonds in order to preserve the low and moderate multifamily housing units provided by the Miraflores Apartments Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency as follows: GAWPD0CS\CCReso-00A\Miraf15Bonds.doc V 1 3 Resolution RDA No. Miraflores 2002 Bond Series A Adopted: February 19, 2002 Section 1. Pursuant to the Act and the Indenture of Trust (hereinafter defined), bonds of the Agency, designated as "Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, (Miraflores Apartments) 2002 Series A" in an aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $5,000,000.00 (the "Bonds") are hereby authorized to be issued. The Bonds shall be dated the date of their issuance and delivery, shall bear interest, shall mature and shall be otherwise issued upon the terms and conditions set out in and in conformity with the Indenture of Trust. The form, terms and provisions of the Bonds and the provisions for the signatures, authentication, payment, registration, transfer, exchange, redemption and number shall be as set forth in the Indenture of Trust. The proceeds of the Bonds are hereby authorized to be applied to the construction of the Miraflores Apartment Project, all as provided in the Financing Agreement and the Indenture of Trust. Section 2. The Indenture of Trust, by and between the Agency and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Trustee (the "Trustee"), dated as of March 1, 2002 (the "Indenture of Trust"), in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk, is hereby approved. Wells Fargo Bank National Association is hereby appointed as Trustee under the Indenture of Trust. The Chairperson or the Executive Director or the Assistant Executive Director or their designees are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to execute and deliver the Indenture of Trust in substantially the form presented, with such additions thereto or changes therein as Bond Counsel (as hereinafter defined) and such officer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Indenture of Trust by such officer, or any official of the Agency designated by such officer. Section 3. The Bond Purchase Agreement among the Agency, the Developer, and Newman & Associates, Inc. (the "Underwriter"), to be dated the date of the sale of the Bonds (the "Bond Purchase Agreement"), in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk, and the sale of the Bonds pursuant thereto, is hereby approved. The Chairperson or the Executive Director or the Assistant Executive Director, or their designees are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to accept the offer of the Underwriter to purchase the Bonds contained in the Bond Purchase Agreement at an initial interest rate not to exceed twelve percent 0 2%) per annum and to execute and deliver the Bond Purchase Agreement in substantially the form presented. Section 4. The Financing Agreement among the Agency, the Trustee and the Developer, dated as of March 1, 2002 (the "Financing Agreement"), in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk is hereby approved. The Chairperson or the Executive Director or Assistant Executive Director, or their designees are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to execute and delivery the Financing Agreement in substantially the form presented, with such j G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\Miraf15Bonds.doc u 1 -4 Resolution RDA No. Miraflores 2002 Bond Series A Adopted: February 19, 2002 additions thereto or changed therein as Bond Counsel or such officer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Financing Agreement by such officer, or any official of the Agency designated by such officer. Section 5. The Regulatory Agreement and Declarations of Restrictive Covenants Including Fannie Mae Rider among the Agency, the Trustee and the Developer, dated as of March 1, 2002 (the "Regulatory Agreement"), in a form to be approved by the Executive Director is hereby approved. The Chairperson or the Executive Director or Assistant Executive Director or their designees, are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to execute and deliver the Regulatory Agreement in substantially the form presented, with such additions thereto or changes therein as Bond Counsel or such officer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Regulatory Agreement by such officer or any official of the Agency designated by such officer. Section 6. The Assignment and Intercreditor Agreement, by and among the Agency, the Trustee, the Developer and Fannie Mae, dated as of March 1, 2002 (the "Assignment Agreement"), in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk, is hereby approved. The Chairperson or the Executive Director or the Assistant Executive Director or their designees are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to execute and deliver the Assignment Agreement in substantially the form presented, with such additions thereto or changes therein as Bond Counsel (as hereinafter defined) and such officer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Assignment Agreement by such officer, or any official of the Agency designated by such officer. Section 7. The LIHTC Agreement among the Agency, Fannie Mae and the Developer, dated as of March 1, 2002 (the "LIHTC Agreement"), in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk is hereby approved. The Chairperson or the Executive Director or Assistant Executive Director, or their designees are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to execute and delivery the LIHTC Agreement in substantially the form presented, with such additions thereto or changed therein as Bond Counsel or such officer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the LIHTC Agreement by such officer, or any official of the Agency designated by such officer. Section 8. The Multifamily Note, by the Developer to the Agency, dated as of March 1, 2002 (the "Note"), and endorsed by the Agency to Fannie Mae and the Trustee, in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk, is hereby approved. The Chairperson or the Executive Director or the Assistant Executive Director or their designees are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the 4 'l G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\Miraf15Bonds.doc Resolution RDA No. Miraflores 2002 Bond Series A Adopted: February 19, 2002 Agency, to endorse the Note in substantially the form presented, with such additions thereto or changes therein as Bond Counsel (as hereinafter defined) and such officer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Note by such officer, or any official of the Agency designated by such officer. Section 9. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds (the "Official Statement"), in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk, is hereby approved and deemed final for purposes of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Chairperson or the Executive Director or the Assistant Executive Director, or their designees, are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to execute an deliver the Official Statement to the Underwriter in substantially the form presented, with such additions thereto or changes therein as Bond Counsel or such officer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the, execution and delivery of the official Statement by such officer or any official of the Agency designated by such officer. The Agency hereby authorized and approves the uses of the Official Statement, and any other document described in the Official Statement in connection with the public offering and sale of the Bonds. Section 10. Rutan & Tucker, LLP is hereby appointed as bond counsel ("Bond Counsel") for the Agency in connection with the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds. Section 1 1. The Chairperson, the Executive Director, or the Assistant Executive Director, or their designees are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to execute and deliver any and all necessary and related documents and agreements approved by Bond Counsel, including but not limited to disclosure agreements, notes, security agreements, collateral agreements, subordination agreements, remarketing agreements, tax certificates, assignment agreements, and take all other necessary and related actions to effectuate the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds as shall be approved by Bond Counsel and such officer. Section 12. All actions heretofore taken by the Agency to effectuate the authorization, issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved. Section 13. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency held on this 19th day of February, 2002, by the 4 following vote, to wit: ttlo GAWPD0CS\CCReso-00A\Miraf15Bonds.doc Resolution RDA No. Miraflores 2002 Bond Series A Adopted: February 19, 2002 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: TERRY HENDERSON, Chair City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, Agency Secretary City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, Agency Counsel City of La Quinta, California GAWPD0CS\CCReso-00A\MirafMonds.doc RESOLUTION RDA NO. RESOLUTION OF THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF NOT TO EXCEED $3,000,000 MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS, (MIRAFLORES PROJECT) 2002 SERIES B; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AN INDENTURE OF TRUST, REGULATORY AGREEMENT, FINANCING AGREEMENT, OTHER AGREEMENTS, OFFICIAL STATEMENT, BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT, AND ALL NECESSARY AND RELATED DOCUMENTS AND ACTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUTHORIZATION, ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF THE BONDS RESOLVED, by the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") that: WHEREAS, this Agency has determined to issue revenue bonds of the Agency to -finance the acquisition and construction of multifamily housing pursuant to Chapter of Part 1 of Division 24 of the Health & Safety Code of the State of California (the "Act") and has determined to borrow money for such purpose by the issuance of revenue bonds as authorized by the Act in order to preserve low and moderate multifamily housing units provided by the Miraflores Apartments Project as (hereinafter defined); and WHEREAS Miraflores, L.P. (the "Developer") has requested the assistance of the Agency in relation to the issuance of bonds relating to the financing of the construction of a multifamily rental housing development that is known as Miraflores Apartments and located in La Quinta (the "Miraflores Apartments Project"); and WHEREAS, the Indenture of Trust, Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants, Fannie Mae Rider to Regulatory Agreement, Financing Agreement, Tax Certificate, Official Statement, Bond Purchase Agreement and other necessary and related documents in connection with the issuance, sale and delivery of the bonds have been presented and provided to this Board; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest and for the public benefit that the Agency issue, sell and deliver such Bonds in order to preserve the low and moderate multifamily housing units provided by the Miraflores Apartments Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to the Act and the Indenture of Trust (hereinafter defined), bonds of the Agency, designated as "Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Miraflores Apartments) 2002 Series B" in an aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $3,000,000.00 (the "Bonds") are hereby authorized to be issued. The Bonds i shall be dated the date of their issuance and delivery, shall bear interest, shall mature G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\MirafISeriesBond3.doc Resolution RDA No. Miraflores 2002 Series B Bonds Adopted: February 19, 2002 and shall be otherwise issued upon the terms and conditions set out in and in conformity with the Indenture of Trust. The form, terms and provisions of the Bonds and the provisions for the signatures, authentication, payment, registration, transfer, exchange, redemption and number shall be as set forth in the Indenture of Trust. The proceeds of the Bonds are hereby authorized to be applied to the construction of the Miraflores Apartments Project, all as provided in the Financing Agreement and the Indenture of Trust. Section 2. The Indenture of Trust, by and between the Agency and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Trustee (the "Trustee"), dated as of March 1, 2002 (the "Indenture of Trust"), in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk, is hereby approved. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is hereby appointed as Trustee under the Indenture of Trust. The Chairperson or the Executive Director or the Assistant Executive Director or their designees are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to execute and deliver the Indenture of Trust in substantially the form presented, with such additions thereto or changes therein as Bond Counsel (as hereinafter defined) and such officer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Indenture of Trust by such officer, or any official of the Agency designated by such officer. Section 3. The Bond Purchase Agreement among the Agency, the Developer, and Newman & Associates, Inc. (the "Underwriter"), to be dated the date of the sale of the Bonds (the "Bond Purchase Agreement"), in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk, and the sale of the Bonds pursuant thereto, is hereby approved. The Chairperson or the Executive Director or the Assistant Executive Director, or their designees are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to accept the offer of the Underwriter to purchase the Bonds contained in the Bond Purchase Agreement at an initial interest rate not to exceed twelve percent 0 2%) per annum and to execute and deliver the Bond Purchase Agreement in substantially the form presented. Section 4. The Financing Agreement among the Agency, the Trustee and the Developer, dated as of March 1, 2002 (the "Financing Agreement"), in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk is hereby approved. The Chairperson or the Executive Director or Assistant Executive Director, or their designees are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to execute and delivery the Financing Agreement in substantially the form presented, with such additions thereto or changed therein as Bond Counsel or such officer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Financing Agreement by such officer, or any official of the Agency designated by such officer. Section 5. The Regulatory Agreement and Declarations of Covenants, including Fannie Mae Rider among the Agency, the Trustee and the Developer, dated as of March 1, 2002 (the "Regulatory Agreement"), in a form to be approved by the Executive Director is hereby approved. The Chairperson or the Executive Director or 19 GAMDOMCCReso-COMMiraflSeriesBondMoc Resolution RDA No. Miraflores 2002 Series B Bonds Adopted: February 19, 2002 Assistant Executive Director or their designees, are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to execute and deliver the Regulatory Agreement in substantially the form presented, with such additions thereto or changes therein as Bond Counsel or such officer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Regulatory Agreement by such officer or any official of the Agency designated by such officer. Section 6. The Assignment and Intercreditor Agreement, by and among the Agency, the Trustee, the Developer and Fannie Mae, dated as of March 1, 2002 (the "Assignment Agreement"), in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk, is hereby approved. The Chairperson or the Executive Director or the Assistant Executive Director or their designees are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to execute and deliver the Assignment Agreement in substantially the form presented, with such additions thereto or changes therein as Bond Counsel (as hereinafter defined) and such officer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Assignment Agreement by such officer, or any official of the Agency designated by such officer. Section 7. The LIHTC Agreement among the Agency, Fannie Mae and the Developer, dated as of March 1, 2002 (the "LIHTC Agreement"), in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk is hereby approved. The Chairperson or the Executive Director or Assistant Executive Director, or their designees are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to execute and delivery the LIHTC Agreement in substantially the form presented, with such additions thereto or changed therein as Bond Counsel or such officer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the LIHTC Agreement by such officer, or any official of the Agency designated by such officer. Section 8. The Multifamily Note, by the Developer to the Agency, dated as of March 1, 2002 (the "Note"), and endorsed by the Agency to Fannie Mae and the Trustee, in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk, is hereby approved. The Chairperson or the Executive Director or the Assistant Executive Director or their designees are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to endorse the Note in substantially the form presented, with such additions thereto or changes therein as Bond Counsel (as hereinafter defined) and such officer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Note by such officer, or any official of the Agency designated by such officer. Section 9. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds (the "Official Statement"), in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk, is hereby approved and deemed final for purposes of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Chairperson or the Executive Director or the Assistant Executive Director, or their designees, are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to execute an deliver the Official Statement to the Underwriter in substantially the form presented, with such additions thereto or changes therein as Bond Counsel or such officer may require or approve, such approval G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\MirafISeriesBondMoc Resolution RDA No. Miraflores 2002 Series B Bonds Adopted: February 19, 2002 to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the official Statement by such officer or any official of the Agency designated by such officer. The Agency hereby authorized and approves the uses of the Official Statement, and any other document described in the Official Statement in connection with the public offering and sale of the Bonds. Section 10. Rutan & Tucker, LLP is hereby appointed as bond counsel ("Bond Counsel") for the Agency in connection with the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds. Section 1 1. The Chairperson, the Executive Director, or the Assistant Executive Director, or their designees are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to execute and deliver any and all necessary and related documents and agreements approved by Bond Counsel, including but not limited to disclosure agreements, notes, security agreements, collateral agreements, subordination agreements, remarketing agreements, tax certificates, assignment agreements, and take all other necessary and related actions to effectuate the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds as shall be approved by Bond Counsel and such officer. Section 12. All actions heretofore taken by the Agency to effectuate the authorization, issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency held on this 19th day of February, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: TERRY HENDERSON, Chair City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, Agency Secretary City of La Quinta, California 02JA G:\WPDOMCCReso-COA\MirafBeriesBondMoc Resolution RDA No. Miraflores 2002 Series B Bonds Adopted: February 19, 2002 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, Agency Counsel City of La Quinta, California w 020B GAWPDOCS\CCReso-00A\MiraflSeriesBondMoc ATTACHMENTS v�l. SUMMARY REPORT FOR THE AMENDMENT TO THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT FOR A SENIOR APARTMENTS DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND MIRAFLORES, LP. FEBRUARY 19, 2002 INTRODUCTION ATTACHMENT 1 This document is the Summary Report ("Report") for the Amendment ("Amendment") to the Affordable Housing Agreement Senior Apartments Development ("SA Agreement) by and between the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") and Miraflores LP. ("Miraflores LP" or the "Developer"). The Amendment facilitates the completion of a 1 18-unit multi -family residential development, and associated public improvements and open space amenities in the Miraflores housing development ("Miraflores"). The SA Development is part of Miraflores located on a 34.4 net acre parcel of land northwest of the intersection of Avenue 48 and Jefferson Street in La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 ("Site"). The Miraflores development also includes the development of 86 single family detached housing units for sale (the "SFR Development") which is the subject of a separate affordable housing agreement approved by the Agency on September 19, 2000. This Report has been prepared pursuant to Section 33433 of the California Health and Safety Code (the California Community Redevelopment Law or "Community Redevelopment Law") and presents the following: 1 . A summary of the proposed SA Development. 2. The cost of the Amendment to the Agency. THE SA DEVELOPMENT City and Agency Housing Mandates Both the City of La Quinta ("City") and the Agency are mandated by the State Planning and the Community Redevelopment Laws to continually seek opportunities that increase and improve the supply of housing affordable to very low, low, and moderate income households. State Planning Laws mandate that the City pursue a housing mix that accommodates both local and regional housing demand for affordable dwellings. The Community Redevelopment Law provides that the Agency must pursue the production of affordable units within the Agency's two Redevelopment Project areas. Said Law further mandates that a minimum of 15% of all new and rehabilitated dwelling units within these project areas be affordable to very low, low, and moderate 5011 income households, and that these dwellings feature covenants that maintain their G:\WPDOCS\Documents\MiraFSumRpt.wpd affordability for a minimum of fifty five years. If the Agency does not implement this housing mandate, then the Agency's non -housing redevelopment revenue may be withheld. Background On December 20, 2000 the Agency executed the SA Agreement with DC & TC, LLC ("DC &TC") through which it transferred title to the site of the SA Development to DC & TC and provided $6,000,000 in assistance for the SA Development. DC & TC with the Agency's approval assigned its interest to Miraflores LP, a limited partnership with non-profit housing developer LINC Housing Corporation ("LINC") acting as the general partner. As provided for under the SA Agreement, Miraflores LP applied for 9% Low Income Housing Tax Credits ("9% Credits") in 2001 but were unsuccessful in receiving an allocation. In December of 2001 Miraflores LP applied for an allocation of 4% Low Income Housing Tax Credits ("4% Credits") and an allocation of tax- exempt bonding capacity from the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee ("CDLAC") and were successful in receiving allocations. Since 4% Credits provide less in capital from the sale of tax credits than 9% Credits, the Agency Assistance must be increased to make up the shortfall. The SA Development will provide 118 units for rent to senior households of low and moderate income levels. The terms of the CDLAC allocation impose a requirement that for 55 years 30% of the units be rented to very low income households (at or below 50% of area median income) and the balance will be rented to households earning 60% or less of area median income. THE COST OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE AGENCY The Amendment will increase the cost of the SA Agreement to the Agency from $6,000,000 to $9,500,000. To date, the Agency has expended $2,173,678 through the SA Agreement and a previous Affordable Housing Agreement with Catellus Residential Group for land acquisition, off -site improvements, government and City fees, preliminary architecture and engineering improvements, and tax credit applications, leaving $7,326,322 in Agency assistance yet to be expended. This remaining assistance will be paid to Developer on a prorata basis over the development period. Source of the additional Agency Funds The source of the revenue to underwrite the additional $3.5 million of the Agency's $9,500,000 of assistance will be a combination of Project Area No.1 & 2 tax increment revenue and remaining proceeds from the Agency's 1995 Housing Bond, as follows: Tax Increment Revenue — Project areas no. 1 &2 - $3,214,643 1995 Housing Bond Proceeds - $ 285,357 Remaining information concerning the SA Development was set forth in Summary Report prepared in connection with the approval of the SA Agreement. A copy of that 6 �► Summary Report is attached hereto as Exhibit A. J G:\WPDOCS\Documents\MiraFSumRpt.wpd u 2 3 A copy of the proposed Amendment is attached to this Report or available for review at City Hall. The proposed Amendment will be the subject of a joint public hearing and the Agency and City Council on February 19, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta California. G:\WPDOCS\Documents\MiraFSumRpt.wpd u 2 4 ATTACHMENT #2 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT (SENIOR APARTMENTS DEVELOPMENT) This First Amendment to Affordable Housing Agreement (Senior Apartments Development) ("First Amendment") is entered into this day of February, 2002, by and between The La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") and Miraflores, L.P. ("Developer"). RECITALS: A. Agency and Developer are parties to that certain Affordable Housing Agreement dated December 20, 2000 (the "AHA"), as amended and assigned by that certain Assignment and Assumption of Affordable Housing Agreement (Senior Apartments Development), dated June 11, 2001 (the "Assignment"). The AHA as amended and assigned by the Assignment is hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement". B. The Agreement provides for total Agency Assistance, as defined in the Agreement, of Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000). C. The Agreement anticipated the Developer receiving 9% Low Income Housing Tax Credits ("9% Credits") from the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee ("CTCAC") and financing the balance of the development costs through conventional construction and permanent mortgage financing. Developer applied for said 9% Credits and did not receive an allocation. D. Developer did apply for 4% Low Income Housing Tax Credits ("4% Credits") and an allocation of bonding capacity from the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee ("CDLAC"). Said application was successful, but will require an increase in the Agency Assistance from Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000) to Nine Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($9,500,000). AMENDMENT The parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Section 201 (1) of the Agreement, titled Agency Assistance, is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following: Agency Assistance The Agency, subject to section 201.3 below, agrees to provide to Developer, pursuant to this Agreement, certain financial assistance in an amount not to exceed NINE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($9,500,000.00), which shall consist of the following 500 r g- G:\WPDOCS\Documents\MiraFAHA1stAmd.doc 0 4'' J components: (1) a write -down of the value of the SA Site incorporated into the purchase price for the SA Site ("Acquisition Assistance"), (2) funding of certain public improvements for the project as set forth in Attachment No. 12 ("Public Improvements Assistance"), (3) payment of a portion of public entity fees ("Fees Assistance"), and other assistance required to facilitate the development of the Project (all of the foregoing, collectively, the "Agency Assistance"). The Agency Assistance shall be disbursed in accordance with the disbursement procedures set forth in Attachment No. 1 1 . Agency agrees that included within and part of the Agency Assistance, Developer shall be permitted to be reimbursed, upon submittal to the Agency Executive Director of sufficient verifiable cost documentation, up to Three Hundred Ten Thousand Four Hundred Eleven Dollars ($310,41 1 .00) in architectural, engineering, and other pre -development costs incurred through the date of submittal of the Tax Credit application. The Agency Assistance has been funded from the Agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. Accordingly, Developer acknowledges and agrees that the use of the SA Site shall be subject to all of the affordability restrictions set forth in this Agreement, and the Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (Attachment No. 8). As a condition to provision of the Agency Assistance, Developer shall execute the SA Note in the form of Attachment No. 6 in the amount of the total Agency Assistance of Nine Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($9,500,000.00) and a deed of trust in the form of Attachment No. 7 ("SA Deed of Trust") which shall secure repayment of the SA Note and shall secure Developer's obligations to utilize the Agency Assistance and develop the SA Development on the SA Site in accordance with this Agreement and the Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions. The SA Note, SA Deed of Trust, and the Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions shall be recorded at close of escrow for Agency's conveyance of the SA Site to Developer as further described in this Agreement. At the completion of construction, should a final audit of development costs determine that there have been excess funds contributed from any source to finance the project development, then said excess funds shall first be paid as provided for in the Trust Indentures (as that term is hereinafter defined) and any remaining excess funds shall then be paid to Agency as a principal reduction of the SA Note. The excess funds to which Agency is entitled hereunder shall be paid to Agency within thirty (30) days of the completion of the audit. As used herein, the term "Trust Indentures" shall mean, collectively, (i) that certain Trust Indenture for GAWPDOCS\Documents\MiraFAHA1 stAmd.doc 2 0i~1u the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency $5,000,000 Variable Rate Demand Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Miraflores Apartments, 2002 Series A), and (ii) that certain Trust Indenture for the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency $3,000,000 Fixed Rate Demand Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Miraflores Apartments, 2002 Series B). 2. Section 201 (2) of the Agreement, titled Tax Credits, is hereby amended in part by deleting the first paragraph thereof and replacing it with the following: Developer proposes to qualify for and obtain 9% Tax Credits in the First Allocation Round of 2001, and if unsuccessful in obtaining an allocation of 9% Tax Credits, shall apply for an allocation of 4% Tax Credits in the last Allocation Round of 2001, pursuant to the low-income housing tax credit program authorized pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 42, California Health and Safety Code Sections 50199.6-50199.19, Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 17057.5, 17058, 23610.4, and 23610.5, and applicable federal and state regulations such as 4 California Code of Regulations Sections 10300-10340 (collectively, the "Low -Income Housing Tax Credit Program"). In the event Developer obtains Tax Credits, Agency shall not have any responsibilities or obligations with respect thereto. Developer shall also comply with the requirements set forth below." (The balance of section 201 (2) is not amended and remains as set forth in the Agreement) . 3. Section 201 (3) of the Agreement, titled Agency Termination for Failure of Developer to Obtain Tax Credits: Alternative Fundina Sources is deleted. 4. Attachment 6 to the Agreement, the SA Development Promissory Note, is hereby deleted and replaced with the Promissory Note attached hereto as Exhibit "A" with a principal amount of Nine Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($9,500,000.00). Developer shall execute the new Note as Maker and shall deliver it to the Agency within ten (10) business days of execution of this First Amendment by Agency. Upon receipt of the new Note the Agency shall return the original $6,000,000 Note to Developer. 5. Attachment 7 to the Agreement, the SA Deed of Trust, is hereby deleted and replaced with the SA Deed of Trust attached hereto as Exhibit "B". Developer shall execute the new SA Deed of Trust, shall have its signature notarized, and shall deliver it to the Agency within ten (10) business days of execution of this First Amendment by Agency. Upon receipt of the new SA Deed of Trust the Agency shall execute the new Jr� GAWPDOCS\Documents\MiraFAHA 1 stAmd.doc 027 3 SA Deed of Trust, and shall record a Certificate of Reconveyance for the original SA Deed of Trust and the new SA Deed of Trust with the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California. Prior. to such recordation, Developer, at its cost, shall provide Agency with a preliminary report, from Stewart Title Company, for the SA Site to confirm that reconveyance of the original SA Deed of Trust and recordation of the new SA Deed of Trust shall not result in the new SA Deed of Trust having a lower priority than the original SA Deed of Trust. In the event such recordations would lower the priority, Developer shall cause to be delivered to Agency for recordation such signed and notarized subordination agreement in form and with content acceptable to Agency's legal counsel, to maintain the priority which the original SA Deed of Trust currently has. 6. Agency and Developer shall cooperate in the issuance of Housing Revenue Bonds ("Housing Bonds") in an amount of up to Eight Million Dollars ($8,000,000.00) utilizing the SA Site as collateral. Said Housing Bonds shall not be general obligation bonds of the Agency or the City of La Quinta ("City") and investors in said Housing Bonds shall look only to the revenue from SA Development, as defined in the Agreement, and the collateral of the SA Site, or any other assurances Developer may provide, as security for their investment. The security for the Housing Bonds shall have a superior position to the SA Deed of Trust. 7. Attachment No. 10 to the Agreement, the Project Budget, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the attached Exhibit "C". 8. The Agency hereby delegates to the Executive Director the authority to execute all agreements required to implement this First Amendment. 9. All capitalized terms used in this First Amendment shall have the same meaning as in the Agreement unless otherwise stated. 10. Except as set forth herein, the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. "DEVELOPER" MIRAFLORES, L.P., a California limited partnership By: DC & TC, LLC., Its general partner J -L Michael J. Shovlin Managing Member GAWPD0CS\Documents\MiraFAHA1 stAmd.doc 4 By: LINC HOUSING CORPORATION, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, its Managing General Partner By: Hunter L. Johnson, its President Dated: , 2002 AGENCY LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Thomas P. Genovese Executive Director ATTEST: Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP attorneys for the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency EXHIBIT A SA DEVELOPMENT PROMISSORY NOTE FORM OF DEVELOPER PROMISSORY NOTE SECURED BY DEED OF TRUST [SEE FOLLOWING PAGES] 5i 1 PROMISSORY NOTE $9,500,000.00 ("Loan Amount") ("Note Date") FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned (herein, the "Maker") hereby promises to pay to the order of the LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body, corporate and politic ("Holder" or "Agency"), at a place designated by Holder, the principal sum of NINE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($9,500,000.00) ("Note Amount"), plus accrued interest, or such lesser amount which shall from time to time be owing hereunder pursuant to the terms hereof. The principal sum hereof shall be disbursed pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in that certain Affordable Housing Agreement by and between Maker's predecessor in interest and Holder, dated December 20, 2000, as amended by that certain Assignment and Assumption Agreement of Affordable Housing Agreement, dated June 11, 2001 by and between Maker and Holder ("AHA"), pertaining to Maker's acquisition and redevelopment of certain real property defined in the AHA as the "SA Site". Reference is also made to the following additional agreements and documents involving Maker and Holder and/or pertaining to the Site: (i) Deed of Trust And Security Agreement With Assignment of Rents and Agreements, by and between Maker as borrower, Holder as beneficiary, and Stewart Title Company, as Trustee, dated and recorded on , as Instrument No in the Office of the Riverside County Recorder ("Agency Deed of Trust"). The Agency Deed of Trust partially secures repayment of this Note. (ii) Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions, dated December 20, 2000, by and between Maker and Holder, for the benefit of Holder, and recorded on January 26, 2001, as Instrument No. 2001- 035561 in the Office of the Riverside County Recorder ("Agency Regulatory Agreement"). All of the foregoing listed documents are referred to herein collectively as the "Agency Agreements." The Agency Agreements are incorporated herein as though fully set forth. Except as otherwise provided herein, the defined terms used in this Note shall have the same meaning as set forth in the AHA. G:\WPD0CS\Documents\MiraFAHA1 stAmd.doc 1 . Purpose of Loan. The loan evidenced by this Note is a loan for the purpose of acquisition and development of the SA Site in accordance with the AHA. The indebtedness evidenced by this Note is and shall be subordinate in right of payment to the prior payment in full of the indebtedness evidenced by (i) a Multifamily Note in the principal amount of $5,000,000 (including any addenda, the "Variable Rate Note") and (ii) a Multifamily Note in the principal amount of $3,000,000 (including any addenda, the "Fixed Rate Note"; together with the Variable Rate Note, the "Senior Note"), each issued by Maker, and payable to Holder as assigned to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee and Fannie Mae, as their interests may appear (collectively, the "Senior Lender"), or order, to the extent and in the manner provided in that certain Subordination Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2002, between the Holder of this Note, the Senior Lender and the Maker of this Note (the "Subordination Agreement"). The deed of trust securing this Note is and shall be subject and subordinate in all respects to the liens, terms, covenants and conditions of the Multifamily Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing securing the Senior Note, as more fully set forth in the Subordination Agreement. The rights and remedies of the Holder and each subsequent holder of this Note under the deed of trust securing this Note are subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth in the Subordination Agreement. Each subsequent holder of this Note shall be deemed, by virtue of such holder's acquisition of the Note, to have agreed to perform and observe all of the terms, covenants and conditions to be performed or observed by the Subordinate Lender under the Subordination Agreement. 2. Principal Amount. The principal amount of this Loan shall be NINE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($9,500,000.00). Simple interest shall accrue on the outstanding principal amount at THREE PERCENT (3%). 3. Term of Note: Repayment. 3.1 Maker shall be obligated to repay the principal amount of this Note and the accrued interest, without set off or deduction, by paying to Holder, each calendar year in which there is positive Cash Flow, (as the term "Cash Flow" is defined in Section 3.1.1), SEVENTY FIVE PERCENT (75%) of that calendar year's Cash Flow. Each such yearly payment shall be due not later than the March 1 st that follows the end of each such calendar year, or, if such March 1 st is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the payment shall be due the next succeeding business day. 3.1.1 For purposes of this Section 3.1, the term "Cash Flow" means: (A) all income derived by Maker from the Site including, without limitation, all tenant rent, all rental subsidy payments made by governmental agencies, and income from any source related to Maker's owning, leasing, maintenance, and operation of the Site and Improvements ("Gross Income"); less (B) (i) expenses actually and reasonably incurred by Maker in owning, leasing, operating, maintaining, and repairing the Site (excluding insurance proceeds and any costs or expenses paid or reimbursed by third 151 � parties), including without limitation, insurance, taxes, maintenance and repair J G:\WPD0CS\Documents\MiraFAHA1 stAmd.doc 2 expenses for the Site, services to the residents specified in Developer's application to the Tax Credit Allocation Committee, capital improvements not funded from the Capital Replacement Reserve (the Capital Replacement Reserve shall be the first source of funds used by Maker for capital improvements to the Site), management costs, an annual Issuer Fee paid to Holder of one eighth of a percent (0.125 %) of the outstanding balance on the Senior Note (which shall be paid prior to the payment of any partnership management fee or any general partner or managing general partner asset management fee), a general partner or managing general partner asset management fee not to exceed one and a quarter percent (1.25%) of Gross Income, a partnership management fee not to exceed Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) per calendar year, developer fees, reasonable accounting and legal fees, and cost of debt service on loans secured by deeds of trust which are recorded against the Site with a higher priority than the Agency Deed of Trust, and any loans with a lower priority than the Agency Deed of Trust if such loans are approved. in advance by the Agency; (ii) the net amount of deposits, if any, into the Capital Replacement Reserve; and (iii) a property management fee which shall not exceed six percent (6%) of the Gross Income generated by the Site and Improvements. Cash Flow shall be calculated on an accrual basis without regard to any carry-over of profit or loss from any prior calendar year. 3.1.2 For purposes of Section 3.1.1, the term "Capital Replacement Reserve" means an amount equal to the higher of $200 per unit per year as of the year 2001 increasing annually by the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim Average, All Items 0 984 = 100), or such replacement reserves as are required by the lender under a superior mortgage or the State of California Tax Credit Allocation Committee. The Capital Replacement Reserve shall be the first source of funds used by Maker for capital improvements to the Site. 3.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, all unpaid principal and all accrued but unpaid interest on this Note shall be due and payable on the fifty-fifth (55th) anniversary date of the Certificate of Completion, as defined in the AHA (the "Maturity Date"). 3.3 Any payments made by Maker in payment of this Note shall be applied in the following order: (i) first to the interest then accrued and due on the unpaid principal balance under this Note, (ii) second to reduction of the principal balance of this Note. 3.4 This Note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without penalty. 4. Default: Cross -Default: Acceleration. 33 G:\WPDOCS\Documents\MiraFAHA 1 stAmd.doc 3 4.1 In addition to Maker's failure to timely perform the requirements of this Note, Maker shall also be in default of this Note if Maker, without the prior written approval of Holder, which approval may be given or withheld in Holder's sole and absolute discretion, refinances any outstanding loan or note secured by the Site for an amount greater than the sum (i) the then -outstanding principal balance of such secured loan(s) or note(s), plus (ii) the reasonable costs of such refinance transaction, which shall not include loan points or origination fees greater than two percent (2%) of the then -outstanding principal balance of such secured loan(s) or note(s). Notwithstanding the foregoing, Maker shall not be in default of this Note and need not seek approval of Holder in refinancing any outstanding loan or note secured by the Site if all net proceeds from such refinance are applied against the unpaid balance of this Note and the debt service arising from such refinance does not reduce Cash Flow. 4.2 Default by Maker of this Note or of any of the Agency Agreements, shall constitute a default of this Note and all of the Agency Agreements. 4.3 In the event of a default of this Note or a default of any of the Agency Agreements by Maker, which default has not been cured within the cure period applicable to such default, Holder may, at its option, declare this Note and the entire obligations hereby evidenced immediately due and payable and collectible then or thereafter as Holder may elect, regardless of the date of maturity, and notice of the exercise of said option is hereby expressly waived by Maker. 4.4 The limited partner of a Tax Credit limited partnership for the Project shall have the same rights as the Holder set forth in this Section 4. 5. Collection Costs: Attorneys' Fees. If, because of any event of default under this Note or any of the Agency Agreements, any attorney is engaged by Holder to enforce of defend any provision of this instrument, whether or not suit is filed hereon, then Maker shall pay upon demand reasonable attorneys' fees, expert witness fees and all costs so incurred by Holder together with interest thereon until paid at the applicable rate of interest payable hereunder, as if such fees and costs had been added to the principal owing hereunder. 6. Waivers by Maker. Maker and all endorsers, guarantors and persons liable or to become liable on this Note waive presentment, protest and demand, notice of protest, demand and dishonor and nonpayment of this Note and any and all other notices or matters of a like nature, and consent to any and all renewals and extensions near the time of payment hereof and agree further that at any time and from time to time without notice, the terms of payment herein may be modified or the security described in any documents securing this Note released in whole or in part, or increased, changed or exchanged by agreement between Holder and any owner of the premises affected by said documents securing this Note, without in any way affecting the liability of any party to this Note or any persons liable or to become liable with respect to any indebtedness evidenced hereby. G:\WPDOCS\Documents\MiraFAHA1 stAmd.doc 4 7. Severability. The unenforceability or invalidity of any provision or provisions of this Note as to any persons or circumstances shall not render that provision or those provisions unenforceable or invalid as to any other provisions or circumstances, and all provisions hereof, in all other respects, shall remain valid and enforceable. 8. Modifications. Neither this Note nor any term hereof may be waived, amended, discharged, modified, changed or terminated orally; nor shall any waiver of any provision hereof be effective except by an instrument in writing signed by Maker and Holder. No delay or omission on the part of Holder in exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver of such right or of any other right under this Note. 9. No Waiver by Holder. No waiver of any breach, default or failure of condition under the terms of this Note shall be implied from any failure of the Holder of this Note to take, or any delay be implied from any failure by the Holder in taking action with respect to such breach, default or failure from any prior waiver of any similar or unrelated breach, default or failure. 10. Usury. Notwithstanding any provision in this Note, the total liability for payment in the nature of interest shall not exceed the limit imposed by applicable laws of the State of California. 11. Nonassignability. Maker may not transfer, assign, or encumber this Note in any manner without the prior, express, written authorization of Holder, which may be given or withheld by Holder in Holder's sole and absolute discretion. It shall be deemed reasonable for Holder to refuse authorization for any reason or no stated reason. Holder may freely transfer, assign, or encumber Holder's interest in this Note in any manner, at Holder's sole discretion. 12. Governing Law. This Note has been executed and delivered by Maker in the State of California and is to be governed and construed in accordance with the laws thereof. 13. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of the obligations and provisions set forth in this Note. 14. Non -Recourse. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein contained, (i) the liability of Maker shall be limited to its interest in the Site and any rents, issues, and profits arising from the Site and, in addition, with respect to any obligation to hold and apply insurance proceeds, proceeds of condemnation or other monies hereunder, any such monies received by it to the extent not so applied in accordance with the terms of this Note; (ii) no other assets of Maker shall be affected by or subject to being applied to the satisfaction of any liability which Maker may have to Holder or to another person by reason of this Note; and (iii) any judgment, order, decree or other ., award in favor of Holder shall be collectible only out of, or enforceable in accordance cJ with, the terms of this Note by termination or other extinguishment of Maker's interest G:\WPDOCS\Documents\MiraFAHA1 stAmd.doc in the Site. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is expressly understood and agreed that the aforesaid limitation on liability shall in no way restrict or abridge Maker's continued personal liability for: (A) fraud or willful or grossly negligent misrepresentation made by Maker in connection with this Note or any of the Agency Agreements; (B) misapplication of (a) proceeds of insurance and condemnation or (b) rent received by Maker under rental agreements entered into for any portion of the Site; (C) the retention by Maker of all advance rentals and security deposits of tenants not refunded to or forfeited by such tenants; (D) the indemnification undertakings of Maker under the Agency Agreements; and (E) material waste by Maker with respect to the Site. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker has executed this Note as of the date and year first above written. "Maker" MIRAFLORES, L.P., a California limited partnership By: DC & TC, LLC, a California limited liability company, its general partner AS Michael J. Shovlin Its: Managing Member By: LINC HOUSING CORPORATION, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, its Managing General Partner 93 Hunter L. Johnson Its: President r3-j") G:\WPD0CS\Documents\MiraFAHA1 stAmd.doc 6 EXHIBIT B FORM OF DEED OF TRUST [See following pages] Recording Requested By And When Recorded Mail To: La Quinta Redevelopment Agency 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Attention: Executive Director Space Above For Recorder Exempt from Recording Fee Per Gov. Code § 6103 DEED OF TRUST AND SECURITY AGREEMENT, WITH ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND AGREEMENTS NOTICE: THIS DEED OF TRUST AND SECURITY AGREEMENT, WITH ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND AGREEMENTS CONTAINS A SUBORDINATION CLAUSE WHICH MAY RESULT IN YOUR SECURITY INTEREST IN THE LAND BECOMING SUBJECT TO AND OF LOWER PRIORITY THAN THE LIEN OF SOME OTHER OR LATER SECURITY INSTRUMENT This Deed of Trust, Security Agreement, and Fixture Filing with Assignment of Rents and Agreements (the "Deed of Trust") is made as of , by MIRAFLORES, L.P., a California limited partnership (the "Trustor"), to STEWART TITLE COMPANY (the "Trustee"), for the benefit of the LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body, corporate and politic ("Beneficiary"). WITNESSETH: Trustor does irrevocably grant, transfer, and assign to Trustee, in trust, with power of sale, all Trustor's right, title, and interest now owned or later acquired in the fee interest in the real property (the "Land") located in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, California, and more particularly described in attached Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (Trustor agrees that any greater title to the Land later acquired during the term of this Deed of Trust will be subject to this Deed of Trust),together with the rents, issues, and profits, subject however, to the right, power, and authority granted and conferred on Trustor in this Deed of Trust to collect and apply the rents, issues, and profits; and Trustor also irrevocably grants, transfers, and assigns to Trustee, in trust, with power of sale, all of Trustor's right, title, and interest now owned or later acquired to the following property (including the rights or interests pertaining to the property) located on the Land: (1) all appurtenances, easements, water and water rights, and pumps and pumping plants, and all shares of stock evidencing these; all of these items, whether now or later acquired, being declared to be for all purposes of this Deed of Trust a part of the Land, the specific enumerations in this Deed of Trust not excluding the general; (2) the rents, issues, profits, and proceeds thereof; and G:\WPD0CS\Documents\MiraFAHA1 stAmd.doc (3) the Land to the extent any fee interest is not included in clauses (1) and (2) above. For the purpose of securing, in the order of priority that Beneficiary determines (a) repayment of moneys advanced by the Beneficiary to the Trustor (the "Loan") as evidenced by a Developer Promissory Note of Trustor of the same date as this Deed of Trust in the principal amount of NINE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($9,500,000.00) (the "Developer Note"), payable to Beneficiary or to order, and all extensions, modifications, or renewals of that Developer Note; (b) payment of all sums, if any, due on the Loan according to the terms of the Developer Note; (c) payment of all other sums (with interest as provided in this Deed of Trust) becoming due and payable to Beneficiary or Trustee pursuant to the terms of this Deed of Trust; and (d) performance of every obligation contained in this Deed of Trust, the Developer Note, the Affordable Housing Agreement of the same date as this Deed of Trust entered into by and between the Trustor and the Beneficiary (the "Affordable Housing Agreement"), and any agreements, supplemental agreements, or other instruments of security executed by Trustor as of the same date of this Deed of Trust for the purpose of further securing any obligation secured by this Deed of Trust, or any part of it, or for the purpose of supplementing or amending this Deed of Trust or any instrument secured by this Deed of Trust. 1.0 DEFINITIONS Certain Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used herein shall have the following meanings unless the context in which they are used clearly requires otherwise. Collateral: The Collateral as defined in Section 9.1 of this Deed of Trust. Default Rate: The maximum rate of interest authorized under the laws of the State of California. Event of Default: Any of the events of default listed under Section 8.1 herein. Loan: The principal and all other amounts, payments, and premiums due, if not waived, under the Developer Note and any extensions or renewals (including, without limitation, extensions or renewals at a different rate of interest, regardless of whether evidenced b a new or additional promissory note or notes as agreed to in writing by J "� Y Trustor), and all other indebtedness or obligations of Trustor to Beneficiary under or -� secured by this Deed of Trust. `� Hazardous Materials: The meaning set forth in Section 212 of the Affordable Housing Agreement. Hazardous Materials Claim: Any enforcement, cleanup, removal, remedial, or other governmental, regulatory, or private actions, agreements, or orders threatened, instituted, or completed pursuant to any Hazardous Materials Law, together with all claims made by any third party against Trustor or the Land relating to damage, contribution, cost -recovery compensation, loss, or injury resulting from the presence, release, or discharge of any Hazardous Materials. Hazardous Materials Law: Those federal, state, or local laws set forth in Section 212.5 of the Affordable Housing Agreement. Impositions: All real estate and personal property taxes and other taxes and assessments, water and sewer rates and charges, and all other governmental charges and any interest or costs or penalties with respect to those charges, assessments, or taxes, ground rent and charges for any easement or agreement maintained for the benefit of the Land, general and special, that at any time may be assessed, levied, imposed, or become a lien on the Land or the rent or income received from the Land, or any use or occupancy of the Land; and any charges, expenses, payments, or assessments of any nature, if any, that are or may become a lien on the Land or the rent or income received from the Land. Improvements: All buildings, improvements, and appurtenances on the Land, and all improvements, additions, and replacements of those improvements and other buildings and improvements, at any time later constructed or placed on the Land. Land: The real property as located in the City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California and more particularly described in attached Exhibit A and any fee interest now owned or later acquired in such property, together with all rights, privileges, hereditaments, tenements, rights of way, easements and appurtenances of the land. Material Adverse Change: Any material and adverse change in: a. the business or properties or condition (financial or otherwise) of Trustor; or b. the condition or maintenance of the Land. Obligations: All of the covenants, promises, and other obligations (other than the Loan) made or owing by Trustor to or due to Beneficiary under or as set forth in the Deed of Trust. Person: Any natural person, corporation, firm, association, government, governmental agency, or any other entity, whether acting in an individual, fiduciary, or other capacity. � �, Personalty: Trustor's interest, if any, in all accounts, contract rights, and general intangibles (specifically including any insurance proceeds and condemnation awards) arising out of the ownership and maintenance of the Land. Project: The land and the SENIOR CITIZEN RENTAL APARTMENT project described in the Affordable Housing Agreement. Receiver: Any trustee, receiver, custodian, fiscal agent, liquidator, or similar officer. Release: Any spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting, escaping, leaching, dumping, or disposing into the environment, including continuing migration, of Hazardous Substances that goes into the soil, surface water, or groundwater of the Land, whether or not caused by, contributed to, permitted by, acquiesced to, or known to Trustor. Security Documents: This Deed of Trust and all other documents now or later securing any part of the payment of the Loan or the observance or performance of the Obligations. Title Policy: The title insurance policy issued by Stewart Title Insurance Company to Beneficiary. Trustor: Collectively, Trustor or any obligor under the Developer Note and the Affordable Housing Agreement, together with their respective affiliates and their respective employees, representatives, and agents. 2.0 WARRANTY OF TITLE Trustor warrants that: 1. Trustor is the owner of the Land; 2. Trustor shall maintain and preserve the lien of this Deed of Trust until the Loan has been paid in full or has been waived by the Beneficiary under the provisions of the Developer Note; 3. Trustor has good, right, and lawful authority to grant the Land as provided in this Deed of Trust; and 4. Trustor will forever warrant and defend the grant made in this Deed of Trust against all claims and demands, except as are specifically set forth in this Deed of Trust. Al. 3.0 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES Trustor represents and warrants to Beneficiary that as of the date of this Deed of Trust: A. Organization of the Trustor. 1. Trustor is a duly organized limited liability company, validly existing, and in good standing under the laws of the State of California and is qualified to do business in California. 2. Trustor has the requisite power and authority to own and maintain its properties, to carry on its business as now being conducted, and to own, maintain and lease the Land. B. Validity of Security Documents. 1. The execution, delivery, and performance by the Trustor of the Security Documents and the borrowings evidenced by the Developer Note: a. are within the power of the Trustor; b. have been duly authorized by all requisite corporate or partnership actions, as appropriate; C. have received all necessary governmental approval; and d. will not violate any provision of law, any order of any court or agency of government, the charter documents of the Trustor, or any indenture, agreement, or any other instrument to which the Trustor is a party or by which the Trustor or any of its property is bound, nor will they conflict with, result in a breach of, or constitute (with due notice and lapse of time) a default under any indenture, agreement, or other instrument, or result in the creation or imposition of any lien, charge, or encumbrance of any nature on any of the property or assets of the Trustor, except as contemplated by the provisions of the Security Documents. 2. Each of the Security Documents, when executed and delivered to Beneficiary, will constitute a valid obligation, enforceable in accordance with its terms. 3. All information and financial statements with respect to the Trustor furnished to Beneficiary disclose all liabilities of the Trustor, fixed and contingent, as of their respective dates. C. Use of Proceeds of Loan. Trustor will use the funds or the Land advanced pursuant to the Developer Note'5( for the purposes set forth in the Affordable Housing Agreement. D. Other Arrangements. Trustor is not a party to any agreement or instrument materially and adversely affecting Trustor's present or proposed business, properties, assets, operation, or condition, financial or otherwise; and Trustor is not in default in the performance, observance, or fulfillment of any of the material obligations, covenants, or conditions in any agreement or instrument to which Trustor is a party that materially and adversely affect Trustor's present or proposed business, properties, assets, operation, or condition, financial or otherwise. E. Litigation. There is not now pending against Trustor, nor to the knowledge of the Trustor is there threatened, any action, suit, or proceeding at law or in equity or before any administrative agency that, if adversely determined, would materially impair or affect: 1. the financial condition or the ability of the Trustor necessary to operate and maintain and sell the Land and Units and other improvements in accordance with the Affordable Housing Agreement; or 2. the condition of the Land. F. Other Warranties. 1. The Land is used principally or primarily for purposes designated in the Affordable Housing Agreement; 2. Trustor is engaged in the development, operation and leasing of the Improvements; and 3. the principal purpose of the Loan is to induce, cause and assist the development, construction and sale of 118 units of rental housing on the Land for senior citizens, at affordable costs for very low, lower, and moderate income households. G. Compliance with Laws. Except as otherwise provided in this Deed of Trust, the Land and the proposed and actual use of the Land comply in all material respects with all laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations of all local, regional, county, state, and federal governmental authorities having jurisdiction (including, but not limited to, the Americans With Disabilities Act), and there is no action or proceeding pending or, to the knowledge of Trustor after due inquiry, threatened before any court, quasi-judicial body, or administrative agency at the time of any disbursement by Beneficiary relating to the validity of the Loan or the proposed or actual use of the Land. 043 4.0 AFFIRMATIVE COVENANTS Until the entire Loan has been paid in full or waived, Trustor covenants to and agrees with Beneficiary as follows: A. Obligations of Trustor. Subject to the provisions set forth in the Developer Note, Trustor will pay the Loan and Trustor will continue to be liable for the payment of the Loan until it has been paid in full or until repayment has been waived or forgiven by the Beneficiary under the terms of the Developer Note. Trustor: 1. will timely perform all the covenants, agreements, terms, and conditions to be performed by Trustor: a.. under this Deed of Trust, Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions, and the Affordable Housing Agreement; and b. as required of Trustor under each document and agreement constituting one of the Security Documents.; and 2. will not cancel, surrender, modify, amend, or permit the cancellation, surrender, modification, or amendment of any of the previously mentioned agreements or any of the covenants, agreements, terms, or conditions contained in any of them, except in the ordinary course of Trustor's business, without the prior written consent, in each case, of Beneficiary which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. B. Insurance. 1. Trustor, at its sole cost and expense, will obtain and maintain or shall cause to be obtained and maintained commercial general liability insurance covering the Land and the ownership, use, occupancy, and maintenance of the Land and the Project in accordance with the Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions and with the Affordable Housing Agreement. 2. Trustor, at its sole cost and expense, but for the mutual benefit of Trustor and Beneficiary, will maintain during the term of this Deed of Trust other insurance, and in any amounts, as may from time to time be reasonably required by Beneficiary against other insurable risks. 3. All policies of insurance required pursuant to this Deed of Trust will be satisfactory in form and substance to Beneficiary and will be approved by Beneficiary as to amounts, form, risk coverage, deductibles, insurer, loss payable, and cancellation provisions. 4. Effective on the occurrence of any Event of Default, all of Trustor's right, title, and interest in all policies of property insurance and any unearned premiums paid are assigned to Beneficiary, who may assign them to any purchaser of the Land at any foreclosure sale. C. Maintenance, Waste, and Repair. Trustor will maintain the Land now or later existing in good and tenantable repair, and will not structurally alter any Improvements located thereon without the prior written consent of Beneficiary, or remove or demolish them in whole or in part, nor will Trustor suffer any waste of the Land or make any change in the use of the Land that will in any way impair the security of this Deed of Trust. Trustor will not abandon the Land or leave the Land unprotected, vacant, or deserted. D. Impositions. Trustor will pay prior to delinquency all Impositions that are or that may become a lien on the Land or are assessed against the Land or its rents, royalties, profits, and income. E. Compliance with Law. Trustor will preserve and keep in full force its existence, rights, and powers. Trustor will promptly and faithfully comply with all present and future laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and requirements of every governmental authority or agency and of every board of fire underwriters (or similar body exercising similar functions) having jurisdiction that may be applicable to it or to the Land or to the use or manner of occupancy, possession, operation, maintenance, alteration, or repair of the Land or any part of it. F. Books and Records. Trustor will maintain complete books of account and other records reflecting the results of Trustor's operations and maintenance of the Land, in a form reasonably satisfactory to Beneficiary, and furnish to Beneficiary any information about the financial condition of Trustor, and the operations and maintenance of the Land as Beneficiary reasonably requests, including, but not limited to, copies of any reports by independent public accountants submitted to Trustor concerning the Land. Beneficiary will have the right, at all reasonable times and on reasonable notice, but not more frequently than once per calendar year unless a greater frequency is necessary for Beneficiary to comply with an applicable law or regulation, to audit, at Beneficiary's sole cost and expense, Trustor's books of account and records relating to the Land, all of which will be made available to Beneficiary and Beneficiary's representatives for that purpose, from time to time, on Beneficiary's request. 040 G. Further Assurances. Trustor, at Trustor's expense and at any time on the reasonable request of Beneficiary, will execute, acknowledge, and deliver any additional papers and instruments and any further assurances of title and will do or cause to be done all further acts and things that may be proper or reasonably necessary to carry out the purpose of this Deed of Trust and to subject to the liens any property intended by the terms to be covered and any renewals, additions, substitutions, replacements, or betterments. H. Statement by Trustor. Trustor, on ten (10) days' written request, will furnish a statement of the amount due or outstanding on the Developer Note and a statement of any offsets, counterclaims, or defenses to the payment. I. Indemnity. 1. If any action or proceeding (whether judicial, regulatory, or administrative) is threatened or commenced, except an action to foreclose this Deed of Trust or to collect the Loan: a. that affects the Land or any portion of it; b. for which Beneficiary is a party; or C. in which it becomes necessary to defend or uphold the lien of this Deed of Trust; then all reasonable costs, fees, and expenses incurred by Beneficiary with respect to the action or proceeding (including, without limitation, reasonable attorney fees and expenses) will, within thirty (30) days after the submission of bills for the costs to Trustor, be paid directly to the billing party by Trustor. 2. In addition, Trustor agrees to pay all costs, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney fees and expenses, incurred by Beneficiary in enforcing the terms of this Deed of Trust, Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions, or the Affordable Housing Agreement. Trustor agrees to indemnify and hold Beneficiary harmless from all liability, loss, damage, or expense (including, without limitation, reasonable attorney fees) that it may incur under this Deed of Trust, or in connection with the Loan secured by this Deed of Trust, the enforcement of any of Beneficiary's rights or remedies, any action taken by Beneficiary under this Deed of Trust, or by reason or in defense of any claims and demands that may be asserted against Beneficiary arising out of the Collateral, unless caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of Beneficiary. 523 �!4k`3 J. Reimbursement. Beneficiary will have the right to declare immediately due any amount paid by it for any real property tax, stamp tax or assessment that affects the land and that was due and not paid by Trustor prior to delinquency. K. Litigation. Trustor will promptly give written notice to Beneficiary of any litigation commenced that materially affects the Land other than unlawful detainer proceedings brought by Trustor. L. Tax Receipts. Subject to the provisions of Section 4.4 of this Deed of Trust, Trustor will present to Beneficiary, within seven (7) days after written demand, bills (that will be receipted from and after the date receipted bills are obtainable) showing the payment to the extent then due of all taxes, assessments or any other Imposition that may have become a lien on the Land prior to the lien of this Deed of Trust. M. Additional Information. Trustor will furnish to Beneficiary, within seven (7) days after written request, all information that Beneficiary may request concerning the performance by Trustor of the covenants of the Affordable Housing Agreement, and Trustor will permit Beneficiary or its representatives at all reasonable times to make investigation or examination concerning that performance. N. Right of Entry. Trustor grants to Beneficiary and its agents, employees, consultants, and contractors the right to enter on the Land, subject to the rights of any tenants of the Project, for the purpose of making any inspections, reports, tests (including, without limitation, soils borings, groundwater testing, wells, or soils analysis), inquiries, and reviews that Beneficiary, in its sole and absolute discretion, deems necessary to assess the then current condition of the Land and compliance with the Affordable Housing Agreement. Beneficiary will provide Trustor with one (1) Business Day's notice of the entry. However, Trustor's consent will not be required for entry or for the performance of tests. All costs, fees, and expenses (including, without limitation, those of Beneficiary's outside counsel and consultants) incurred by Beneficiary with respect to the inspections, reports, tests, inquiries, and reviews, together with all related preparation, consultation, analyses, and review, necessary for compliance with the Security Documents, will be paid by Trustor to Beneficiary on demand, will accrue interest at the Default Rate until paid, and will be secured by this Deed of Trust, prior to any right' title, or interest in or claim on the Land attaching or accruing subsequent to the lien of this Deed of Trust or to which this Deed of Trust is not subordinated. r' 0 Beneficiary, if and when it uses the foregoing Right of Entry to enter upon the Land :►4`7 as set forth in this Section N, shall indemnify, defend, and hold Trustor harmless, from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, causes of action, and costs, including attorney's fees incurred as a result of any claims or litigation, that arise out of the negligence or willful misconduct of Trustor or any of its officers, officials, employees, representatives, or agents in their activity upon the Land pursuant to this Right of Entry. 5.0 NEGATIVE COVENANTS Until the entire Loan has been paid in accordance with the terms of the Developer Note, Trustor covenants to and agrees with Beneficiary as follows: A. Restrictive Uses. Trustor covenants not to initiate, join in, or consent to any change in any zoning ordinance, private restrictive covenant, assessment proceedings, or other public or private restriction inconsistent with the Affordable Housing Agreement. B. Subordination to Other Financing. This Deed of Trust and all covenants, restrictions or regulatory agreements executed by Trustor in favor of Beneficiary in connection with the Land are expressly and shall be automatically subordinated to a deed of trust securing the repayment of construction financing for the development and construction of the Improvements. Trustor will not create or permit to continue in existence any mortgage, pledge, encumbrance, lien or charge of any kind on any of the Land except for: 1. liens for taxes not yet delinquent; and 2. any other liens or charges that are specifically approved in writing by Beneficiary, including any deed of trust executed or to be executed by Trustor or Trustor's successor in interest and recorded in Riverside County, California, to secure a loan obtained for the purpose of the construction of any improvement on the Land contemplated by the Affordable Housing Agreement. Beneficiary agrees to reasonably accommodate Trustor's construction and permanent lenders as may be commercially reasonably necessary to effect the Trustor's construction and permanent loans, including such subordination agreements as may be reasonably necessary. The Beneficiary's Executive Director shall have the authority to enter into one or more such subordination agreements on behalf of the Beneficiary provided and such subordination agreements are consistent with the requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 33334.14. 31 48 C. Transferability. One of the inducements to Beneficiary for making the Loan is the identity of Trustor. The existence of any interest in the Land other than the interests of Trustor and Beneficiary and any encumbrance permitted in this Deed of Trust, even though subordinate to the security interest of Beneficiary, and the existence of any interest in Trustor other than those of the present owners, would impair the Land and the security interest of Beneficiary, and, therefore, Trustor will not sell, convey, assign, transfer, alienate, or otherwise dispose of its interest in the Land, either voluntarily or by operation of law, or agree to do so, except in accordance with the terms of the Affordable Housing Agreement. 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROVISIONS A. Warranties and Covenants. Except. as disclosed in writing to, and acknowledged in writing by, the Beneficiary, Trustor represents and warrants that, to the best of Trustor's knowledge, except in the ordinary course of business, during the period of Trustor's ownership of the Land: (1) there has been no use, generation, manufacture, storage, treatment, disposal, discharge, Release, or threatened Release of any Hazardous Materials by any person on or around the Land; and (2) there have been no Hazardous Materials transported over or through the Land. Trustor agrees, except in the ordinary course of business and in strict compliance with all applicable Hazardous Materials Laws, as follows: 1. not to cause or permit the Land to be used as a site for the use, generation, manufacture, storage, treatment, Release, discharge, disposal, transportation, or presence of any Hazardous Materials; 2. not to cause, contribute to, permit, or acquiesce in any Release or threatened Release; 3. not to change or modify the use of the Land without the prior written consent of Beneficiary; 4. to comply with and to cause the Land and every User of the Land to comply with all Hazardous Materials Laws; 5. to immediately notify Beneficiary in writing and to provide Beneficiary with a reasonably detailed description of: a. any Hazardous Materials Claim; e, 53.1 A9 b. any Release or threatened Release; and C. the discovery of any occurrence or condition on any real property adjoining or in the vicinity of the Land that would cause the Land or any part of it to be designated as hazardous waste property or border zone property under the provisions of Health and Safety Code § § 25220, et seq. and any regulation adopted in accordance with that section; 6. in the event that Trustor discovers a Release or the presence of any Hazardous Materials on or about the Land in violation of any Hazardous Materials Law, to a. cause the Land to be in compliance with all Hazardous Materials Laws; b. notify Beneficiary of that discovery together with a reasonably detailed description; 7. promptly after a request by Beneficiary, engage a qualified environmental engineer reasonably satisfactory to Beneficiary to investigate these matters and prepare and submit to Beneficiary a written report containing the findings and conclusions resulting from that investigation, all at the sole expense of Trustor; and 8. take, at Trustor's sole expense, all necessary actions to remedy, repair, clean up, or detoxify any Release or Hazardous Materials, including, but not limited to, any remedial action required by any Hazardous Materials Laws or any judgment, consent, decree, settlement, or compromise in respect of any Hazardous Materials Claims, these actions to be performed: engineer; actions; and (1) in accordance with Hazardous Materials Laws; (2) in a good and proper manner, (3) under the supervision of a qualified environmental (4) in accordance with plans and specifications for these (5) using licensed and insured qualified contractors; 9. immediately furnish to Beneficiary copies of all written communications received r, by Trustor from any governmental authority or other person or given by Trustor to J 3 y) any person and any other information Beneficiary may reasonably request :11513 concerning any Release, threatened Release, Hazardous Materials Claim, or the discovery of any Hazardous Materials on or about the Land in violation of any Hazardous Materials Law; and 10. keep Beneficiary generally informed regarding any Release, threatened Release, Hazardous Materials Claim, or the discovery of any Hazardous Materials on or about the Land in violation of any Hazardous Materials Law. B. Inspection and Receivership Rights. Upon Beneficiary's reasonable belief that Trustor has failed to comply with any environmental provision of this Deed of Trust and upon reasonable prior notice (except in the case of an emergency) to Trustor, Beneficiary or its representatives, employees, and agents, may from time to time and at all reasonable times (or at any time in the case of an emergency) enter and inspect the Land and every part of it (including all samples of building materials, soil, and groundwater, and all books, records, and files of Trustor relating to the Land) and perform those acts and things that Beneficiary deems necessary to inspect, investigate, assess, and protect security of this Deed of Trust, for the purpose of determining: 1. the existence, location, nature, and magnitude of any Release or threatened Release; 2. the presence of any Hazardous Materials on or about the Land in violation of any Hazardous Materials Law; and 3. the compliance by Trustor of every environmental provision of this Deed of Trust. In furtherance of the purposes above, without limitation of any of its other rights, Beneficiary may: a. obtain a court order to enforce Beneficiary's right to enter and inspect the Land under California Civil Code § 2929.5, to which the decision of Beneficiary as to whether there exists a Release, a threatened Release, any Hazardous Materials on or about the Land in violation of any Hazardous Materials Law, or a breach by Trustor of any environmental provision of this Deed of Trust, will be deemed reasonable and conclusive as between the parties; and b. have a receiver appointed under California Code of Civil Procedure § 564 to enforce Beneficiary's right to enter and inspect the Land for the purpose set forth above. C, , All costs and expenses reasonably incurred by Beneficiary with respect to the audits, tests, inspections, and examinations that Beneficiary or its agents, representatives, or employees may conduct, including the fees of the engineers,, laboratories, contractors, consultants, and attorneys, will be paid by Trustor. All costs or expenses incurred by Trustee and Beneficiary pursuant to this subsection (including without limitation court costs, consultant's fees, and attorney fees, whether incurred in litigation and whether before or after judgment) will bear interest at the Default Rate from the date they are incurred until those sums have been paid in full. Except as provided by law, any inspections or tests made by Beneficiary or its representatives, employees, and agents will be for Beneficiary's purposes only and will not be construed to create any responsibility or liability on the part of Beneficiary to Trustor or to any other person. Beneficiary will have the right, but not the obligation, to communicate with any governmental authority regarding any fact or reasonable belief of Beneficiary that constitutes or could constitute a breach of any of Trustor's obligations under any environmental provision contained in this Deed of Trust. C. Release and Indemnity. Trustor: 1. releases and waives any future claims against Beneficiary for indemnity or contribution in the event Trustor becomes liable for cleanup or other costs under any Hazardous Materials Laws or under any Hazardous Materials Claim, except as otherwise provided in Sections 110(7), 212(3) and 212(4) of the Affordable Housing Agreement;' 2. agrees to reimburse Beneficiary, on demand, for all costs and expenses reasonably incurred by Beneficiary in connection with any review, approval, consent, or inspection relating to the environmental provisions in this Deed of Trust together with interest, after demand, in accordance with Section 212.3 of the Affordable Housing Agreement; and 3. agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold Beneficiary and Trustee harmless from all losses, costs, claims, damages, penalties, liabilities, causes of action, judgments, court costs, attorney fees and other legal expenses, costs of evidence of title, cost of evidence of value, and other expenses as set forth in Section 212.3 of the Affordable Housing Agreement. D. Request for Information. Trustor and Beneficiary agree that: 1 . this Section D.1 is intended as Beneficiary's written request for information and Trustor's written response concerning the environmental condition of the Land as provided by California Code of Civil Procedure § 726.5; and 2. each representation, warranty, covenant, or indemnity made by Trustor in this Article or in any other provision of this Deed of Trust that relates to the ro environmental condition of the Land is intended by Trustor and Beneficiary to be an 3 environmental provision for purposes of California Code of Civil Procedure § 736 and will survive the payment of the Loan and the termination or expiration of this Deed of U ti Trust will not be affected by Beneficiary's acquisition of any interest in the Land, whether by full credit bid at foreclosure, deed in lieu of that, or otherwise. If there is any transfer of any portion of Trustor's interest in the Land, any successor -in -interest to Trustor agrees by its succession to that interest that the written request made pursuant to this Article will be deemed remade to the successor -in -interest without any further or additional action on the part of Beneficiary and that by assuming the debt secured by this Deed of Trust or by accepting the interest of Trustor subject to the lien of this Deed of Trust, the successor remakes each of the representations and warranties in this Deed of Trust and agrees to be bound by each covenant in this Deed of Trust, including, but not limited to, any indemnity provision. 7.0 CASUALTIES AND CONDEMNATION A. Casualties. 1 . Trustor will promptly notify Beneficiary in writing after any loss or damage caused by defect in Trustor's title to the Land and Trustor will furnish to Beneficiary within ninety (90) days after the loss or damage the following: a. evidence satisfactory to Beneficiary that such defect is cured; and b. evidence satisfactory to Beneficiary that sufficient funds are available or committed for the benefit of Beneficiary, including insurance proceeds, to secure the repayment of the full amount of the Loan if such repayment is not waived. Subject to the rights of Trustor's construction and permanent lender(s), all insurance proceeds shall be applied and used to restore, repair and rebuild the Improvements in accordance with the provisions of the Affordable Housing Agreement. Any proceeds not used for the repair, restoration, modification or improvement of the Land or the repayment of the construction or permanent loan(s) shall be applied, in the sole and absolute discretion of the Beneficiary, against the Loan. B. Condemnation. Trustor, immediately upon obtaining knowledge of the institution of any proceedings for the condemnation of the Land or any portion of it, will notify Trustee and Beneficiary of the pendency of the proceedings. Trustee and Beneficiary may participate in any proceedings and Trustor from time to time will deliver to Beneficiary all instruments requested by Beneficiary to permit participation. Beneficiary will be under no obligation to question the amount of any award or compensation. In any condemnation proceedings, Beneficiary may be represented by counsel selected by Beneficiary. The proceeds of any award or compensation received will be applied 3 pursuant to the provisions of the construction or permanent loan documents and provisions of Section 7.1 of this Deed of Trust. ! u 8.0 EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND REMEDIES A. Events of Default. The following events are each an Event of Default: 1 . Default in the payment of any sum of principal when due and not waived under the Developer Note which is not cured within the applicable cure period set forth therein; 2. A default under the Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions or the Affordable Housing Agreement which is not cured within the applicable cure period set forth therein; 3. The failure (without cure during the applicable period) of the Trustor to observe, perform, or discharge any obligation, term, covenant, or condition of this Deed of Trust; 4. The sale, hypothecation, conveyance, or other disposition of the Land except in accordance with Sections 5.0 of this Deed of Trust or in accordance with the Affordable Housing Agreement; and 5. Any representation or warranty made by Trustor or any other Person under this Deed of Trust is false or misleading in any material respect as of the date on which the representation or warranty was made. If one or more Events of Default occurs and are continuing, then Beneficiary may declare all the Loan to be due and the Loan will become due without any further presentment, demand, protest, or notice of any kind, and Beneficiary may: a. in person, by agent, or by a receiver, and without regard to the adequacy of security, the solvency of Trustor, or the existence of waste, enter on and take possession of the Land or any part of it in its own name or in the name of Trustee, sue for or otherwise collect the rents, issues, and profits, and apply them, less costs and expenses of operation and collection, including reasonable attorney fees, upon the Loan, all in any order that Beneficiary may determine. The entering on and taking possession of the Land, the collection of rents, issues, and profits, and the application of them will not cure or waive any default or notice of default or invalidate any act done pursuant to the notice; b. commence an action to foreclose this Deed of Trust in the manner provided by law for the foreclosure of mortgages of real property; C. deliver to Trustee a written Agreement of default and demand for sale, and a written notice of default and election to cause the Land to be �+ sold, which notice Trustee or Beneficiary will cause to be filed for record; s l�v� d. with respect to any Personalty, proceed as to both the real and personal property in accordance with Beneficiary's rights and remedies in respect of the Land, or proceed to sell the Personalty separately and without regard to the Land in accordance with Beneficiary's rights and remedies; or e. exercise any of these remedies in combination or any other remedy at law or in equity. B. Power of Sale. 1. If Beneficiary elects to foreclose by exercise of the power of sale in this Deed of Trust, Beneficiary will also deposit with Trustee this Deed of Trust, the Developer Note, and any receipts and evidence of expenditures made and secured as Trustee may require. If notice of default has been given as then required by law, and after lapse of the time that may then be required by law, after recordation of the notice of default, Trustee, without demand on Trustor, will, after notice of sale having been given as required by law, sell the Land at the time and place of sale fixed by it in the notice of sale, either as a whole or in separate parcels as Trustee determines, and in any order that it may determine, at public auction to the highest bidder. Trustee may postpone sale of all or any portion of the Land by public announcement at the time and place of sale, and from time to time after that may postpone the sale by public announcement at the time fixed by the preceding postponement, and without further notice make the sale at the time fixed by the last postponement; or Trustee may, in its discretion, give a new notice of sale. Beneficiary may rescind any notice of default at any time before Trustee's sale by executing a notice of rescission and recording it. The recordation of the notice will constitute a cancellation of any prior Agreement of default and demand for sale and of any acceleration of maturity of the Loan affected by any prior Agreement or notice of default. The exercise by Beneficiary of the right of rescission will not constitute a waiver of any default then existing or subsequently occurring, or impair the right of Beneficiary to execute other Agreements of default and demand for sale, or notices of default and of election to cause the Land to be sold, nor otherwise affect the Developer Note or this Deed of Trust, or any of the rights, obligations, or remedies of Beneficiary or Trustee. After sale, Trustee will deliver to the purchaser its deed conveying the property sold, but without any covenant or warranty, express or implied. The recitals in the deed of any matters or facts will be conclusive proof of their truthfulness. Any Person, including Trustor, Trustee, or Beneficiary, may purchase at that sale. If allowed by law, Beneficiary, if it is the purchaser, may turn in the Developer Note at the amount owing on it toward payment of the purchase price (or for endorsement of the purchase price as a payment on the Developer Note if the amount owing exceeds the purchase price). Trustor expressly waives any right of redemption after sale that Trustor may have at the time of sale or that may apply to the sale. 2. Trustee, upon the sale, will make (without any covenant or warranty, express or implied), execute and, after due payment made, deliver to a 3 �, purchaser and its heirs or assigns a deed or other record of interest, as the case may be, to the Land sold, which will convey to the purchaser all the title and interest of j Trustor in the Land and will apply the proceeds of the sale in payment: �, 5 a. first, of the expenses of the sale together with the expenses of the trust, including, without limitation, attorney fees, that will become due on any default made by Trustor, and also any sums that Trustee or Beneficiary have paid for procuring a search of the title to the Land subsequent to the execution of this Deed of Trust; and b. second, in payment of the Loan then remaining unpaid, and the amount of all other monies with interest in this Deed of Trust agreed or provided to be paid by Trustor. Trustee will pay the balance or surplus of the proceeds of sale to Trustor and its successors or assigns as its interests may appear. C. Proof of Default. If there is a sale of the Land, or any part of it, and the execution of a deed for it, the recital of default and of recording notice of breach and election of sale, and of the elapsing of the required time between the recording and the following notice, and of the giving of notice of sale, and of a demand by Beneficiary that the sale should be made, will be conclusive proof of the default, recording, election, elapsing of time, and the due giving of notice, and that the sale was regularly and validly made on proper demand by Beneficiary. Any deed with these recitals will be effectual and conclusive against Trustor, its successors, and assigns, and all other Persons. The receipt for the purchase money recited or in any deed executed to the purchaser will be sufficient discharge to the purchaser from all obligations to see to the proper application of the purchase money. D. Protection of Security. If an Event of Default occurs and is continuing, Beneficiary or Trustee, without limitation to do so, without notice to or demand upon Trustor, and without releasing Trustor from any obligations or defaults may in the exercise of their reasonable discretion: 1. enter on the Land in any manner and to any extent that either deems necessary to protect the security of this Deed of Trust; 2. appear in and defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect, in any manner, the Obligations or the Loan, the security of this Deed of Trust, or the rights or powers of Beneficiary or Trustee; 3. pay, purchase, or compromise any encumbrance, charge, or lien that in the judgment of Beneficiary or Trustee is prior or superior to this Deed of Trust; and 4. pay necessary expenses, employ counsel, and pay reasonable 5 3 ' attorney fees. t► 5 0 Trustor agrees to repay on demand all sums expended by Trustee or Beneficiary pursuant to this section with interest at the Default Rate, and those sums, with interest, will be secured by this Deed of Trust. E. Receiver. If an Event of Default occurs and is continuing, Beneficiary, as a matter of strict right and without notice to Trustor or anyone claiming under Trustor and without regard to the then value of the Land, will have the right to apply ex parte to any court having jurisdiction to appoint a Receiver of the Land, and Trustor waives notice of any application for that, provided a hearing to confirm the appointment with notice to Trustor is set within fourteen 0 4) days after the appointment. Any Receiver will have all the powers and duties of receivers in similar cases and all the powers and duties of Beneficiary in case of entry as provided in this Deed of Trust, and will continue as such and exercise all those powers until the date of confirmation of sale, unless the receivership is terminated sooner. F. Curing the Defaults. If Trustor at any time fails to perform or comply with any of the terms, covenants, and conditions required on Trustor's part to be performed and complied with under this Deed of Trust or the Developer Note, Trustor is required to perform, then Beneficiary, after ten (10) days' notice to Trustor (or without notice if Beneficiary determines that an emergency exists), and without waiving or releasing Trustor from any of the Obligations, may, subject to the provisions of any of the Security Documents: 1. make from its own funds any payments payable by Trustor and take out, pay for, and maintain any of the insurance policies provided for; and 2. perform any other acts on the part of Trustor to be performed and enter on the Land for that purpose. The making by Beneficiary of payments out of Beneficiary's own funds will not, however, be deemed to cure the default by Trustor, and they will not be cured unless and until Trustor reimburses Beneficiary for the payments. All sums paid and all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by Beneficiary in connection with the performance of any act, together with interest on unpaid balances at the Default Rate from the respective dates of Beneficiary's making of each payment, will be added to the principal of the Loan, will be secured by the Security Documents and by the lien of this Deed of Trust, prior to any right, title, or interest in or claim on the Land attaching or accruing subsequent to the lien of this Deed of Trust, and will be payable by Trustor to Beneficiary on demand. G. Inspection Rights. 544 On reasonable notice (except in the case of an emergency), and without releasing Trustor from any obligation to cure any default of Trustor, Beneficiary or its �15 7 agents, representatives, and employees acting by themselves or through a court- appointed receiver, may, from time to time and at all reasonable times (or at any time in the case of an emergency) enter and inspect the Land and every part of it and perform any acts and things as Beneficiary deems necessary or desirable to inspect, investigate, assess, and protect the security of this Deed of Trust, for the purpose of determining compliance with covenants and restrictions contained this Deed of Trust. H. Judgment on Environmental Provision. Beneficiary or its agents, representatives, and employees may seek a judgment that Trustor has breached its covenants, representations, or warranties in Article 6 of this Deed of Trustor any other covenants, representations, or warranties that are deemed to be environmental provisions pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 736 (each an Environmental Provision), by commencing and maintaining an action or actions in any court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 736, whether commenced prior to or after foreclosure of the lien of this Deed of Trust. Beneficiary or its agents, representatives, and employees may also seek an injunction to cause Trustor to abate any action in violation of any Environmental Provision and may seek the recovery of all costs, damages, expenses, fees, penalties, fines, judgments, indemnification payments to third parties, and other out-of-pocket costs or expenses actually incurred by Beneficiary (collectively, "Environmental Costs") incurred or advanced by Beneficiary relating to the cleanup, remedy, or other response action required by any Hazardous Materials Law, or any Hazardous Materials Claim, or which Beneficiary believes necessary to protect the Land. It will be conclusively presumed between Beneficiary and Trustor that all Environmental Costs incurred or advanced by Beneficiary relating to the cleanup, remedy, or other response action of or to the Land were made by Beneficiary in good faith. All Environmental Costs incurred by Beneficiary under this subsection (including, without limitation, court costs, consultant fees, and reasonable attorney fees, whether incurred in litigation and whether before or after judgment) will bear interest at the legal rate from the date of expenditure until those sums have been paid in full. Beneficiary will be entitled to bid, at any trustee's or foreclosure sale of the Land, the amount of the costs, expenses, and interest in addition to the amount of the Loan. I. Waive Lien. Beneficiary or its agents, representatives, and employees may waive its lien against the Land or any portion of it, including the Improvements and the Land, to the extent that the Land is found to be environmentally impaired in accordance with California Code of Civil Procedure § 726.5, and to exercise all rights and remedies of an unsecured creditor against Trustor and all of Trustor's assets and property for the recovery of any deficiency and Environmental Costs, including, but not limited to, seeking an attachment order under California Code of Civil Procedure § 483.010. As between Beneficiary and Trustor, for purposes of California Code of Civil Procedure § 726.5, Trustor will have the burden of proving that Trustor or any related party (or any affiliate or agent of Trustor or any related party) was not in any way negligent in permitting the Release or threatened Release of the Hazardous Materials. 54 j58 J. Remedies Cumulative. All remedies of Beneficiary provided for in this Deed of Trust are cumulative and will be in addition to all other rights and remedies provided in any other Security Documents or the Affordable Housing Agreement or provided by law, including any banker's lien and right of offset. The exercise of any right or remedy by Beneficiary will not in any way constitute a cure or waiver of default, will not invalidate any act done pursuant to any notice of default, nor will it prejudice Beneficiary in the exercise of any of its rights unless, in the exercise of those rights, Beneficiary collects the total amount of the Loan. 9.0 SECURITY AGREEMENT A. Security Interest. The security interest includes all policies of insurance arising out of the ownership of the Land, and all accounts, contract rights, chattel paper, instruments, general intangibles, and other obligations of any kind now or later existing, arising out of, or in connection with the ownership and maintenance of the Land (the "Collateral"). The security interest also includes all rights now or later existing in all security agreements, leases, and other contracts securing or otherwise relating to any accounts, contract rights, chattel paper, instruments, general intangibles, or obligations; all causes of action and recoveries now or later existing for any loss or diminution in value of the Land; all proceeds of any of the Land; and, to the extent not otherwise included, all payments under insurance (whether Beneficiary is the loss payee), or any indemnity, warranty, or guaranty payable by reason of loss or damage to or otherwise with respect to any of the Collateral. B. Remedies. Trustor agrees to execute and deliver on demand, and irrevocably constitutes and appoints Beneficiary the attorney -in -fact of Trustor to execute, deliver, and file, any security agreements, financing statements, continuation statements, or other instruments that Beneficiary may request to impose, perfect, or continue the perfection of the lien or security interest created by this Deed of Trust. Beneficiary has all rights and remedies, whether at law, in equity, or by statute that are available to secured creditors. Any disposition may be conducted by an employee or agent of Beneficiary or Trustee. Any Person, including both Trustor and Beneficiary, will be eligible to purchase any part or all of the Collateral at any disposition. C. Expenses. Expenses of retaking, holding, and preparing for sale, selling, or the like will be borne by Trustor and will include Beneficiary's and Trustee's attorney fees and legal expenses. Trustor, on demand of Beneficiary, will assemble the Collateral and make it available to Beneficiary at the Land, a place deemed to be reasonably convenient to Beneficiary and Trustor. Beneficiary will give Trustor at least ten (10) days' prior J 5 9 written notice of the time and place of any public sale or other disposition of the Collateral or of the time of or after which any private sale or any other intended disposition is to be made. If the notice is sent to Trustor in the manner provided for the mailing of notices in this Deed of Trust, it is deemed reasonable notice to Trustor. D. Assignment of Agreements. 1. As security for the Loan, Trustor sells, assigns, transfers, sets over, and delivers to Beneficiary (subject to the prior rights of any construction or permanent lender(s)) all of Trustor's right, title, and interest in all agreements, permits, and contracts pertaining to the ownership and maintenance of the Land, including, but not limited to, environmental impact reports; negative Agreements; map approvals; grading permits; conditional use permits; applications for all permits; management agreements; all development rights in the Land that Trustor may now or later acquire (including, without limitation, development rights arising in connection with any action by a governmental entity, including, by way of illustration, but not of limitation, inducement resolutions of county, municipal, or other governmental entities); agreements with contractors, suppliers, and construction managers; and agreements pertaining to the transfer of development rights or permitted floor area under applicable laws or ordinances (collectively, "Agreements"), as they may be amended or otherwise modified from time to time, including, without limitation, the right of Trustor to terminate any of the Agreements, to perform under them, and to compel performance and otherwise exercise all remedies under them, together with the immediate and continuing right to collect and receive all sums that may become due to Trustor, or which Trustor may now or later become entitled to demand or claim, arising or issuing out of the Agreements, including, without limitation, claims of Trustor for damages arising out of breach of or default under any of the Agreements and all rights of Trustor to receive proceeds of any insurance, indemnity, warranty, or guaranty with respect to any of the Agreements. However, so long as no Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, Trustor will have the right under a license granted to collect and retain all sums that may become payable to Trustor under the Agreements. 2. Trustor covenants and agrees to punctually observe, perform, and discharge the obligations, terms, covenants, conditions, and warranties to be observed, performed, and discharged by it under the Agreements. Beneficiary, upon an Event of Default, at its option and upon written notice to Trustor, will have the right to declare the assignment in this Section 9.4 to be absolute, and, in addition, Beneficiary will have the complete right then or later to exercise and enforce all of the rights and remedies provided by law. 3. The acceptance by Beneficiary of the assignment in this Article 9.5, with all the rights, powers, privileges, and authority granted will not, prior to the exercise of Beneficiary's right to declare the assignment in this Article 9.4 to be absolute, obligate Beneficiary to assume any obligations under the Agreements or to take any action under them, or to expend any money or incur any expense or perform or discharge any obligation, duty, or liability under the Agreements, or to assume any obligation or responsibility for the nonperformance of the provisions by Trustor. ,` 6 10.0 ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS A. Assignment. Trustor irrevocably assigns to Beneficiary: 1. all of Trustor's right, title, and interest in all leases; licenses; agreements relating to the management, leasing, or operation of the Land; and other agreements of any kind relating to the use or occupancy of the Land, whether now existing or entered into after the date of this Deed of Trust; and 2. the rents, issues, and profits of the Land, including, without limitation, all amounts payable and all rights and benefits accruing to Trustor under any leases (the "Payments"), for the purposes and on the terms and conditions below. This is a present and absolute assignment, not an assignment for security purposes only, and Beneficiary's right to the leases and payments is not contingent on, and may be exercised without, possession of the Land. B. License. Beneficiary confers on Trustor a license (the "License") to collect and retain the Payments as they become due until the occurrence of an Event of Default. Upon an Event of Default, the License will be automatically revoked and Beneficiary may collect and retain the Payments without notice and without taking possession of the Land. The lessees will have no right or duty to inquire as to whether any Default has actually occurred or is then existing. Trustor relieves the lessees from any liability to Trustor by reason of relying on and complying with any notice or demand by Beneficiary. C. Effect of Assignment. The assignment will not impose on Beneficiary any duty to produce rents, issues, or profits from the Land, or cause Beneficiary to be: 1. a mortgagee -in -possession for any purpose; 2. responsible for performing any of the obligations of the lessor under any leases; or 3. responsible for any waste committed by lessees or any other parties, any dangerous or defective condition of the Land, or any negligence in the management, upkeep, repair, or control of the Land. Beneficiary will not be liable to Trustor or any other party as a consequence of the exercise of the rights granted to Beneficiary under this assignment. D. Leasing Covenants. 54 � Trustor covenants and agrees as follows: 1. At Trustor's sole cost to: a. perform all obligations of the lessor under the any leases and enforce performance by the lessees of their obligations under such leases; b. subject to the provisions of Section 10.4(b) below, enforce all remedies available to Trustor in case of default by the lessees under the leases and prosecute and defend any action, arbitration, or other controversy relating to the leases or to Trustor's interest in the leases; C. exercise diligent, good -faith efforts to keep all portions of the Land, if applicable, leased at all times and at rental rates set forth in the Affordable Housing Agreement; and d. promptly upon execution, deliver to Beneficiary fully executed counterpart originals of the leases; and 2. except in compliance with the terms of the Affordable Housing Agreement, not to enter into, assign, terminate, modify, or amend the terms of, any leases, or to assign the Payments, or to subordinate the leases to any other deed of trust or encumbrances. Any attempted action in violation of the provisions of this Section 10.4(b) will be voidable at Beneficiary's election. E. Application of Rents. Beneficiary, in its sole discretion, may apply, or require the application of, all amounts received pursuant to the assignment to the payment of any one or more of the obligations in any order that Beneficiary may elect. F. Remedies. In addition to any other remedies in this Deed of Trust, Beneficiary will have the following rights and remedies upon the occurrence of an Event of Default: 1. To receive the Payments and any other amounts arising or accruing under the leases or from the Land; 2. To collect, sue for, settle, compromise, and give releases for the Payments and pursue any remedies for the enforcement of the leases or Trustor's rights under the leases; and 3. To take possession of the Land, and hold, manage, lease, and operate it on any terms and for any period of time that Beneficiary may deem proper and, either with or without taking possession of the Land, in its own name, make from time to time all alterations, renovations, repairs, or replacements that Beneficiary may deem proper. ►62 G. Definitions. The terms lessor and lessors as used in this Deed of Trust will include all owners, landlords, licensors, and other parties in a similar position with respect to the leases. The terms lessee and lessees will include any tenants and licensees and any other parties in a similar position and will also include any guarantor or other obligors under the leases. 11.0 MISCELLANEOUS A. Successor Trustee. Beneficiary may remove Trustee or any successor trustee at any time and appoint a successor trustee by recording a written substitution in the county where the Land is located, or in any other manner permitted by law. Upon that appointment, all of the powers, rights, and authority of Trustee will immediately become vested in the successor. B. No Waiver. No waiver by Beneficiary of any default or breach by Trustor will be implied from any omission by Beneficiary to take action on account of that default if the default persists or is repeated. Also, no express waiver will affect any default other than the default in the waiver and the waiver will be operative only for the time and to the extent stated. Waivers of any covenant, term, or condition in this Deed of Trust will not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same covenant, term, or condition. The consent or approval by Beneficiary for any act by Trustor requiring further consent or approval will not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the consent or approval for any subsequent similar act. C. Abandonment. Subject to any chattel mortgages, security agreements, or other liens on title that may exist with the consent of Beneficiary, or any provided for in this Deed of Trust, all Personalty that upon foreclosure of the Land is owned by Trustor and is used in connection with the maintenance of the Land will be deemed at Beneficiary's option to have become on that date a part of the Land and abandoned to Beneficiary in its then condition. D. Notices . All notices, advices, demands, requests, consents, statements, satisfactions, waivers, designations, refusals, confirmations, or denials that may be required or contemplated under this Deed of Trust for any party to serve on or give to any other will be in writing, and, if not in writing, will not be deemed to have been given. Also, 13 �, they must be either personally served or sent with return receipt requested by registered or certified mail with postage (including registration or certification charges) prepaid in a securely enclosed and sealed envelope as follows: If to Trustor: Miraflores, L.P. C/o LINC Housing Corporation 110 Pine Ave., Suite 525 Long Beach, California 92802 If to Beneficiary: La Quinta Redevelopment Agency 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Attention: Executive Director E. Survival. The covenants and agreements in this Deed of Trust will bind and inure to the benefit of Beneficiary and Trustor and their successors and assigns. It is agreed that Beneficiary may assign to or grant a participation in any one or more lenders, free from any right of counterclaim, recoupment, or setoff, by Trustor, Beneficiary's rights and obligations in whole or in part under the Security Documents. Nothing in this Section 11 .5 is intended to limit other provisions in any other Security Documents or in the Affordable Housing Agreement or any recorded document that by their terms survive the repayment of the Loan or the termination of any Security Document. F. Severability. If any term, provision, covenant, or condition of this Deed of Trust or any application of it is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, in whole or in part, all terms, provisions, covenants, and conditions of this Deed of Trust and all applications of it not held invalid, void, or unenforceable will continue in full force and will not be affected, impaired, or invalidated. G. References to Foreclosure. References in this Deed of Trust to foreclosure and related phrases are references to the appropriate procedure in connection with Trustee's private power of sale, any judicial foreclosure proceeding, and any deed given in lieu of foreclosure. H. Joinder of Foreclosure. If Beneficiary holds any other or additional security for the payment of any Loan or performance of any Obligation, its sale or foreclosure, on any default in the payment or performance, in Beneficiary's sole discretion, may be prior to, subsequent to, or 3 joined or otherwise contemporaneous with any sale or foreclosure. In addition to the 1�6 rights in this Deed of Trust specifically conferred, Beneficiary, at any time and from time to time, may exercise any right or remedy now or later given by law to beneficiaries under deeds of trust generally, or to the holders of any obligations of the kind secured. I. Rights of Beneficiary and Trustee . At any time and from time to time, without liability and without notice, and without releasing or otherwise affecting the liability of any person for payment of any of the Loan: 1. Beneficiary, at its sole discretion and only in writing, may extend the time for or release any Person now or later liable for payment of any of the Loan, or accept or release additional security, or subordinate the lien or charge of this Deed of Trust; or 2. Trustee, on written request of Beneficiary and presentation of the Developer Note, any additional notes secured by this Deed of Trust, and this Deed of Trust for endorsement, may reconvey any part of the Land, consent to the making of any map or plat of it, join in granting any easement on it, or join in any agreement of extension or subordination. On Beneficiary's written request and surrender of the Developer Note, any additional notes secured by this Deed of Trust, and this Deed of Trust to Trustee for cancellation, and on payment to Trustee of its fees and expenses, Trustee will reconvey without warranty the then trust property. The recitals in any reconveyance will be conclusive proof of the truthfulness of them, and the grantee in any reconveyance may be described as the person legally entitled. J. Copies. Trustor will promptly give to Beneficiary copies of: 1. all notices of violation that Trustor receives from any governmental agency or authority; and 2. all notices of default that Trustor receives under the Bond Documents. K. Subordination to Contracts of Sale and Leases. At the option of Beneficiary, this Deed of Trust will become subject and subordinate, in whole or in part (but not with respect to priority of entitlement to any insurance proceeds, damages, awards, or compensation resulting from damage to the Land or condemnation or exercise of power of eminent domain), to any contracts of (, sale or any leases of the Land on the execution by Beneficiary and recording of a 16 unilateral Agreement to that effect in the official records of the county and state t!�J where the Land is located. Beneficiary may require the issuance of any title insurance endorsements to the Title Policy in connection with any subordination that Beneficiary, in its judgment, determines are appropriate, and Trustor will be obligated to pay any cost or expense incurred in connection with the issuance. L. No Merger. So long as any of the Loan remains unpaid or Beneficiary has any further obligation under the Security Documents, unless Beneficiary otherwise consents in writing, the fee estate of Trustor in the Land or any part of it will not merge, by operation of law or otherwise, with any leasehold or other estate in the Land or any part of it, but will always be kept separate and distinct, regardless of the union of the fee estate and the leasehold or other estate in Trustor or any other Person. M Performance by Trustor. Trustor will faithfully perform every covenant to be performed by Trustor under any lien or encumbrance, including, without limiting the generality of this Deed of Trust, mortgages, deeds of trust, leases, Agreements or covenants, conditions and restrictions, and other agreements that affect the Land, in law or in equity, that Beneficiary reasonably believes may be prior and superior to or on a parity with the lien or charge of this Deed of Trust. A breach of or a default under any lien or encumbrance that exists after any applicable grace period in the pertinent instrument has expired without that breach or default having been cured, will constitute an Event of Default under this Deed of Trust. If Trustor fails to do so, Beneficiary, without demand or notice and in its sole judgment, may do any things required by Trustor by any of the provisions in this Deed of Trust and incur and pay expenses in connection with such provisions. Nothing in this section affects Trustor's obligations pursuant to Sections 5.2 and 5.3 of this Deed of Trust or limits Beneficiary's rights. N. Junior Liens. Trustor agrees: 1. that as of the date of this Deed of Trust there are no encumbrances to secure debts junior to this Deed of Trust; and 2. that there are to be none as of the date when this Deed of Trust becomes of record. 0. Waiver of Statute of Limitations. The pleading of any statute of limitations as a defense to any obligations secured by this Deed of Trust is waived, to the fullest extent permissible by law. Ir.4 ','GU P. Charges for Statements. Trustor agrees to pay Beneficiary's reasonable charge, to the maximum amount permitted by law, for any statement regarding the obligations secured by this Deed of Trust requested by Trustor or on its behalf. Q. Waiver of Marshaling Rights. 1. Trustor, for itself and for all parties claiming through or under Trustor, and for all parties who may acquire a lien on or interest in the Land, waives all rights to have the Land or any other property that is now or later may be security for any Obligation ("Other Land") marshaled on any foreclosure of this Deed of Trust or on a foreclosure of any other security for any of the Obligations. Beneficiary will have the right to sell, and any court in which foreclosure proceedings may be brought will have the right to order a sale of, the Land and any of the Other Land as a whole or in separate parcels, in any order that Beneficiary may designate. R. Acceptance of Trust; Powers and Duties of Trustee. Trustee accepts this trust when this Deed of Trust is recorded. From time to time on written request of Beneficiary and presentation of this Deed of Trust for endorsement, and without affecting the personal liability of any person for payment of any indebtedness or the performance of any obligations, Trustee may, without liability and without notice: 1 . reconvey all or any part of the Land; 2. consent to the making of any map or plat; and 3. join in any grant of easement, any Agreement of covenants, conditions, and restrictions, any extension agreement, or any agreement subordinating the lien or charge of this Deed of Trust. Except as may be required by applicable law, Trustee or Beneficiary may from time to time apply to any court of competent jurisdiction for aid and direction in the execution of the trust and the enforcement of the rights and remedies available, and may obtain orders or decrees directing, confirming, or approving acts in the execution of the trust and the enforcement of the remedies. Trustee has no obligation to notify any party of any pending sale or any action or proceeding, including, without limitation, actions in which Trustor, Beneficiary, or Trustee will be a party, unless held or, commenced and maintained by Trustee under this Deed of Trust. Trustee will not be obligated to perform any act required of it under this Deed of Trust unless the performance of the act is requested in writing and Trustee is reasonably indemnified and held harmless against any loss, cost, liability, or expense. S. Releases, Extensions, Modifications, and Additional Security. Without notice to or the consent, approval, or agreement of any persons or entities having any interest at any time in the Land or in any manner obligated under the Obligations (the "Interested Parties"), Beneficiary may, from time to time, release any person or entity from liability for the payment or performance of any Obligation; take any action or make any agreement extending the maturity or otherwise altering the terms or increasing the amount of any Obligation; or accept additional security or release the Land or other security for any Obligation. None of these actions will release or reduce the personal liability of any of the Interested Parties, or release or impair the lien of this Deed of Trust, or the priority of it on the Land. However, no action taken or agreement made by Beneficiary to extend the maturity or otherwise alter the terms or increase the amount of any Obligation will be binding on Trustor without Trustor's consent. T. Reconveyance. Upon the payment of the Loan and performance of all Obligations, including, without limitation, Beneficiary's receipt of all sums owing and outstanding under the. Developer Note, unless waived by the Beneficiary under the terms of the Developer Note, Beneficiary will deliver to Trustee a written request for reconveyance, and will surrender to Trustee for cancellation this Deed of Trust and any note or instrument evidencing the Loan and the Obligations. However, Beneficiary will have no obligation to deliver the written request and documents until Beneficiary has been paid by Trustor, in immediately available funds, all escrow, closing, and recording costs, the costs of preparing and issuing the reconveyance, and any trustee's or reconveyance fees. On Trustee's receipt of the written request by Beneficiary and the documents, Trustee will reconvey, without warranty, the Land or that portion then held. To the extent permitted by law, the reconveyance may describe the grantee as the person or persons legally entitled and the recitals of any matters or facts in any reconveyance will be conclusive proof of the truthfulness of them. Neither Beneficiary nor Trustee will have any duty to determine the rights of persons claiming to be rightful grantees of any reconveyance. When the Land has been fully reconveyed, the last reconveyance will operate as a reassignment of all future rents, issues, and profits of the Land to the person legally entitled. U. Subrogation. Beneficiary's rights will be subrogated to the lien of all encumbrances, whether released of record, paid in whole or in part by Beneficiary pursuant to this Deed of Trust, or by the proceeds of the Loan secured by this Deed of Trust. V. Obligations of Trustor Joint and Several. If more than one person has executed this Deed of Trust as Trustor, the 1515 obligations of all those persons will be joint and several. 63 W. Rules of Construction. When the identity of the parties or other circumstances make it appropriate, the singular number includes the plural. X. Successors in Interest. The terms, covenants, and conditions in this Deed of Trust will be binding on and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties. Y. No Offset. Trustor will pay to Beneficiary all amounts owing, if not waived, under the Developer Note, this Deed of Trust, or any of the other Obligations without deduction, offset, or counterclaim of any kind. Z. Governing Law. The parties expressly agree that this Deed of Trust (including, without limitation, all questions regarding permissive rates of interest) will be governed by or construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. [end — signature page follows] In Witness Whereof, Trustor has executed this Deed of Trust as of the day and year first above written. TRUSTOR MIRAFLORES, L.P., a California limited partnership By: DC & TC, LLC, A California limited liability company, its general partner Michael J. Shovlin Managing Member By: LINC HOUSING CORPORATION, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, its Managing General Partner 92 Hunter L. Johnson, its President BENEFICIARY LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY go 33 Thomas P. Genovese Executive Director !70 Exhibit "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION The land referred to herein is situated in the State of California, County of Riverside, City of La Quinta, described as follows: REMAINDER PARCEL, OF TRACT 28601-1, AS SHOWN BY MAP IN FILE IN BOOK 278, PAGES 86 THROUGH 90, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 34 r- O .:.� STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On before me, a notary public, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same in his/her authorized capacity, and that by his/her signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Name: [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ss. On , before me, a notary public, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same in his/her authorized capacity, and that by his/her signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Name: [SEAL] ►7? STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF 1 ss. On , before me, a notary public, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same in his/her authorized capacity, and that by his/her signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Name: [SEAL] ��73 EXHIBIT C PROJECT BUDGET [SEE FOLLOWING PAGE] ATTACHMENT NO. 10 PROJECT BUDGET LAND ACQUISITION Land 663,101 Legal fees — acquisition 25,000 Title & Closing — acquisition 25,000 LAND ACQUISITION 713,101 CONSTRUCTION Architecture & Engineering 621,125 Permits & Fees 1,230,129 Offsites & Demolition — Avenue 48 & Jefferson 250,000 Other 106,250 On-sites/infrastructure 1,870,579 Common Area/Landscaping 1,321,320 Base Construction 5,900,133 Models & Furnishings/Recreation Center 113,350 General Requirements/Supervision 433,407 Construction Contingency 526,890 Construction loan fee & interest 489,297 Indirect costs 265,000 Developer overhead 300,000 Developer fees 900,000 SUBTOTAL — CONSTRUCTION 14,327,480 LEASE UP/PERMANENT LOAN Marketing & Leaseup 120,000 Permanent Operating Reserve 250,000 Lease up interest 309,214 Permanent financing costs 344,919 Syndication expense - 0 - Tax Credit Fees 54,966 SUBTOTAL — LEASE UP/PERMANENT LOAN 1,079,099 TOTAL COSTS 16,1 19,680 ATTACHMENT NO. 10 PROJECT BUDGET SOURCES OF FUNDS Construction Period: Construction Loan (Bonds) $8,000,000 Deferred Developer Fees 1,264,191 Tax Credit Equity 1,809,840 Agency Assistance 5,045,649 TOTAL $16,1 19,680 Permanent Operations: Housing Revenue Bonds $3,000,000 Tax Credit Equity — Federal 3,619,680 Tax Credit Equity — State - 0 - Deferred Developer Fee* - 0 - Agency Assistance 9,500,000 TOTAL $16,1 19,680 To be paid from operating cash flow from the Project in initial years of operation. t�70 ALLOCATION OF AGENCY ASSISTANCE The total Agency Assistance of $9,500,000 is allocated to the following project cost categories: COMPLETED BALANCE CATEGORY TO DATE REMAINING Land $ 663,100 - 0 - 48th & Jefferson improvements 250,00 - 0 - utility fees & bond costs -0- 338,442 Planning 184,625 445,109 (includes legal, architecture & engineering, title, indirects) Site preparation 520,254 5,739,386* Government fees 32,061 886,149 City Fees 18,025 422,849 TOTAL $1,668,065 $7,831,935 TOTAL ASSISTANCE $ 663,100 250,000 338,442 729,734 6,159,640 918,210 440,874 *CVWD well site prorated cost of $47,494 and Jefferson median prorated cost of $13,250 to be deducted from Site preparation balance remaining. Agency Assistance to be paid as follows (see following page) : A F-F �- � o 0 oN oN � .-- -4 O \C O � O I O 00 kn O O O CD O CD O 00 00 N N 01 O to M M M M M O O O D DO �D 00 N 00 N O\ M O\ M M � ~ v1 00 00 No� M N O V1 O O O O �o t 00 ON O I - 00 00 to 01 N to O to tz a1 U a d 0 M 4 O— — O O 00 O) N It ON It O O O O O O 00 a\ N O O O O to M [� O O 0^ t— O dT O 110 00 O O O C1 110 O O CN Q O 00 O O O O It M r t— 00 en N N O to O O t` M 00 00 N O Wn O O en F" � pop N N N kn 00 cp O 0�0 W 0000 0000 000 � N Cj N N N ON .� O o 00 C 0� N O � 6 � M 00 O� 00 to N 0000 O O 00 N M O O O CD� O M C4 v O N 0� en O \�o O O O O 00 O to O O Ol� M N N N mi l^ a O 00 � A o 't o a co ON ct to O O 00 M N IV y N N N O eq v ' ? O 00 en 00 en 00 0 Oen 00 N o D ° O O ° v C N N t. 00 ° o 0 go M 10 �o �o \.o o u o u c p m a o > oto¢, a, 0 s�. u, ca a . -d o0 00 Gq ¢ ,_tb U U U co '� O - C CA"" O 'O w ;0 A ° G) O O 69 Q! ° A " o U im. Cd o ° o a a :o ° a H N °' cz d o °; o o 0 o o �° r. m a, o a W d d " U ~ o o oo : o �o okn Page 5 561 ;73