The URL can be used to link to this page

2002 03 19 CCCity Council Agendas are available on the City's web page @www.la-quinta.org City Council Agenda CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-495 Calle Tampico - La Quinta, California 92253 Regular Meeting Tuesday, March 19, 2002 - 2 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER Beginning Res. No. 2002-38 Ord. No. 367 ROLL CALL: Council Members: Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena II. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. III. CLOSED SESSION 1 . CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING THREATENED LITIGATION, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(b). ONE MATTER (DALE FRANK) . 2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS, MARK WEISS, SKI HARRISON AND JOHN RUIZ REGARDING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CURRENT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE LA QUINTA EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION CONCERNING INSURANCE BENEFITS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 MEET AND CONFER. 3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION, CITY OF INDIO V. CITY OF LA QUINTA, CASE NO. INC 025560, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE 54956.9(a). 4. CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a). COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT V. CITY OF LA QUINTA, CASE NUMBER INC 010827. 00 City Council Agenda Page 1 March 19, 2002 NOTE: Time permitting, the City Council may conduct Closed Session discussions during the dinner recess. Additionally, persons identified as negotiating parties, do not attend the closed session when the City is considering acquisition of real property,. RECONVENE AT 3:00 P.M. IV. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE V. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or matters that are not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. Please watch the timing device on the podium. For all Business Session matters or Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak to come forward at the appropriate time. VI. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA VII. PRESENTATIONS PROCLAMATION TO THE HARVEST OF WELLNESS (H.O.W.) FOUNDATION. Vill. WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE - NONE IX. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF MARCH 5, 2002. X. CONSENT CALENDAR Note: Consent Calendar items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved by one motion unless requested for separate consideration by a member of the City Council or the public. 1 . APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED MARCH 19, 2002. 2. TRANSMITTAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT DATED JANUARY 31, 2002. 3. TRANSMITTAL OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED JANUARY 31, 2002. 4. APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND JDD, L.L.C., REGARDING OFFSITE STREET IMPROVEMENTS - LA QUINTA COURT DEVELOPMENT. City Council Agenda Page 2 March 19, 2002 aL::, 5. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL MAP 29791, LA QUINTA COURT. 6. APPROVAL TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO CONSTRUCT THE MONTERO ESTATES SOUND WALL IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 2001-12. 7. APPROVAL OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE FOR THE FRITZ BURNS PARK COURT LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 2000-15. 8. APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR REDEVELOPMENT, HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WITH ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. 9. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR A CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICER TO ATTEND TRAINING CLASSES GIVEN BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS, INC., ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, APRIL 25-27, 2002. 10. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PRINCIPAL PLANNER TO ATTEND THE 2002 CALIFORNIA PRESERVATION CONFERENCE IN SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA, MAY 2-5, 2002. 11. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEND THE CITY CLERK'S ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA ANNUAL INSTITUTE IN SACRAMENTO, APRIL 17-19, 2002. 12. APPROVAL OF AN ART PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH DALE FRANK FOR THE LA QUINTA COURT ART FEATURE. XI BUSINESS SESSION 1. CONSIDERATION OF TECHNICAL TRAFFIC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING VARIOUS TRAFFIC SAFETY ISSUES DISCUSSED AT A TECHNICAL TRAFFIC COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 21, 2002. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 2. CONSIDERATION OF FUNDING REQUEST BY LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 3. CONSIDERATION OF PARTICIPATION IN THE WASTE -TO -WONDERS ART CHALLENGE TO BE HELD APRIL 13, 2002, AS REQUESTED BY S.C.R.A.P. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION XII STUDY SESSION 1 . DISCUSSION OF AMENDING SECTION 12.32.120 OF THE LA QUINTA CHARTER AND MUNICIPAL CODE, REGULATING THE PARKING OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLES. City Council Agenda Page 3 March 19, 2002 XIII. XIV. XV. 2. DISCUSSION OF TRAIL ALTERNATIVES FOR THE MULTI -SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS 2. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WORKSHOP/INFORMATION COMMITTEE (PENA) 3. C.V. MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (PERKINS) 4. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (SNIFF) 5. DESERT RESORTS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 6. DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AD HOC COMMITTEE (HENDERSON/ADOLPH) REVIEW OF MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 2002. 7. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES COMMITTEE (HENDERSON) 8. MUSEUM EXPANSION COMMITTEE (ADOLPH/SNIFF) 9. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION & VISITORS AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 10. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION 11. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FREE LIBRARY SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE 12. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DESERT LIBRARY ZONE ADVISORY BOARD (HENDERSON) 13. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (PENA) 14. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY/SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP (PENA) 15. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 26 & 27, 2002 16. ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 13, 2002 DEPARTMENT REPORTS 1 . CITY MANAGER A. RESPONSE(S) TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK A. REPORT ON UPCOMING EVENTS 4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIRECTOR MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY, 2002 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY, 2002 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY, 2002 7. FINANCE DIRECTOR 8. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY, 2002 9. POLICE CHIEF MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY, 2002 10. FIRE CHIEF MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. 0 011 City Council Agenda Page 4 March 19, 2002 XVI. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak form" and limit your comments to three (3) minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. XVII. PRESENTATIONS - LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL ART WALL CERTIFICATES. XVIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak, to come forward at the appropriate time. 1. PUBLIC HEARING TO REVIEW THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL PURSUANT TO SECTION 9.200.120.D, FOR AN ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 97- 337 (STATE CLEARING HOUSE NO. 9701 1055), SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2002-067 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420. APPLICANT: STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) XIX. ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to the regularly scheduled City Council Meeting, commencing with closed session at 2:00 P.M. and open session at 3:00 p.m., Tuesday, April 2, 2002, in the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. City Council Agenda Page 5 March 19, 2002 DECLARATION OF POSTING I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting of Tuesday, March 19, 2002, was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico and on the bulletin board at the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce and at Stater Bros. 78-630 Highway 1 1 1, on Friday, March 15, 2002. DATED: March 15, 2002 �.�I ) JUNE . G EEK, CMC City Clerk, City of La Quinta, California PUBLIC NOTICES The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at 777-7025, 24-hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 777-7025. A one (1) week notice is required. If background material is to be presented to the City Council, during a City Council Meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the 3:00 p.m session or the 7:00 p.m session for distribution. 00 City Council Agenda Page 6 March 19, 2002 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: MARCH 19, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Demand Register Dated March 19, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Approve Demand Register Dated March 19, 2002 BACKGROUND: Prepaid Warrants: 48536 - 482781 405,673.17 48579 - 485881 328,291.14 Wire Transfers} 254,473.45 P/R 8390 - 84641 106,002.61 P/R Tax Transfers} 275516.35 Payable Warrants: 48589 - 487711 1,4085634.87 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Demand of Cash - City Demand of Cash - RDA $29530,591.59 $15456,301.62 $341,500.22 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION CONSENT CALENDAR STUDY SESSION PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK TRANSACTIONS 2/28/02 - 3/13/02 2/28/02 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $14,655.00 3/1/02 WIRE TRANSFER - DEFERRED COMP $5,253.02 3/1/02 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS $9,393.73 3/1/02 WIRE TRANSFER - CREDIT UNION $5,171.70 3/5/02 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $65,000.00 3/11/02 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $65,000.00 3/13/02 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $65,000.00 3/13/02 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $25,000.00 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT $254,473.45 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 10:16AM 03/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** PAYMENT AMOUNT 48589 03/13/02 &01647 ANGELICA TORRES 42.00 48590 03/13/02 &01652 RONALD ALLEN 45.00 48591 03/13/02 &01653 JEFFERY CARUTHERS 45.00 48592 03/13/02 &01654 MANNY COSTA 437.35 48593 03/13/02 &01655 JUDI CRAWLEY 48.00 48594 03/13/02 &01656 STEVE DODSON CONST INC 201.60 48595 03/13/02 &01657 SANDI PRICE DUNCAN 6.00 48596 03/13/02 &01658 LINDA GOMES 45.00 48597 03/13/02 &01659 CHARLES HEAD 134.22 48598 03/13/02 &01660 LORRAINE HUFF 144.00 48599 03/13/02 &01661 JOAN LOVEN 48.00 48600 03/13/02 &01662 SUE MC CORMACK 2.00 48601 03/13/02 &01663 KATHY ROBERTS 78.00 48602 03/13/02 &01664 SUSAN SPENCER 48.00 48603 03/13/02 &01665 SUNRISE COLLECTIONS INC 170.00 48604 03/13/02 &01666 MELANIE VIZENOR 48.00 48605 03/13/02 &01667 GAIL WEISLER 96.00 48606 03/13/02 &01668 MARIE WICKES 20.00 48607 03/13/02 &01669 LESLIE YOUNG 45.00 48608 03/13/02 &01670 DESIGN STUDIO 10.00 48609 03/13/02 &01671 PACIFIC HOME 60.00 48610 03/13/02 &01672 PAZ CONSTRUCTION 30.00 48611 03/13/02 &01673 LILLIAN CHIARTAS 35.00 48612 03/13/02 &01674 ERIN DANIELS 55.00 48613 03/13/02 &01675 DON ERICKSON 20.00 48614 03/13/02 &01676 LAREN KNODE STUDIO 10.00 48615 03/13/02 &01677 LOG CREATIONS 10.00 48616 03/13/02 &01678 ROMEY MARTINEZ 45.00 48617 03/13/02 &01679 TOM MC QUAID 10.00 48618 03/13/02 &01680 LEE JAYRED 10.00 48619 03/13/02 &01681 JJM PRIMITIVE ARTWORK 10.00 48620 03/13/02 &01682 PEGGY OGDEN 40.00 48621 03/13/02 &01683 RICH VAN NESS 10.00 48622 03/13/02 &01684 DONNA ROSE WINANS 45.00 48623 03/13/02 &01685 VACATION POOLS 206.40 48624 03/13/02 AAB100 AABCO SIGN & BANNER CO 998.25 48625 03/13/02 ABL001 ABLE RIBBON TECH 289.64 48626 03/13/02 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 733.33 48627 03/13/02 ACT100 ACT GIS INC 2720.00 48628 03/13/02 ADT100 ADT SECURITY SVC INC 431.60 48629 03/13/02 ALC050 BOB ALCALA 112.00 48630 03/13/02 ALL300 ALL STAR GLASS 370.97 48631 03/13/02 AMB100 ROBERT AMBRIZ 125.00 48632 03/13/02 AME175 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES 84.00 48633 03/13/02 AME200 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS 89.56 48634 03/13/02 AND050 ANDY'S AUTO REPAIR 348.81 48635 03/13/02 ARC100 ARCH 541.95 0 002 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 10:16AM 03/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 2 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT 48636 03/13/02 AUT030 AUTOMATED TELECOM 835.75 48637 03/13/02 BAN020 BANG & BASH 482.72 48638 03/13/02 BECO10 DEBORAH BECHARD 260.00 48639 03/13/02 BES100 BEST BUY CO INC 1789.99 48640 03/13/02 BOB200 BOB'S SIGN RESTORATION 515.00 48641 03/13/02 BOG100 SHARON BOGAN 195.30 48642 03/13/02 BSA100 B-SAFE INDUSTRIES 805.60 48643 03/13/02 CAD010 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 229.71 48644 03/13/02 CAL240 CALIFORNIA POOLS & SPAS 100.00 48645 03/13/02 CAL275 CAL -WESTERN FOODSERVICE 90.00 48646 03/13/02 CAR300 CARQUEST 48.77 48647 03/13/02 CBR100 CBRPC 30.00 48648 03/13/02 CDW050 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 2026.72 48649 03/13/02 CEN010 CENTURY FORMS INC 141.94 48650 03/13/02 CLA050 CLASSIC AUTO TRANSPORT 75.00 48651 03/13/02 COA021 COACHELLA VALLEY ECONOMIC 5000.00 48652 03/13/02 COA067 COACHELLA VLLY PONTIAC 2852.78 48653 03/13/02 COA073 COACHELLA VLLY RECREATION 20358.00 48654 03/13/02 COA081 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 38500.00 48655 03/13/02 COL020 PAT COLE 479.50 48656 03/13/02 COM015 COMPUTER U LEARNING CENTR 862.50 48657 03/13/02 COM030 COMSERCO 131.46 48658 03/13/02 CON115 CONTRERAS CONST 170480.98 48659 03/13/02 C00050 J P COOKE CO, THE 53.25 48660 03/13/02 C00100 COOLEY CONSTRUCTION INC 13698.40 48661 03/13/02 C00300 VALI COOPER & ASSOC INC 1058.28 48662 03/13/02 COR021 CORONEL ENTERPRISES 36.00 48663 03/13/02 COR150 CORPORATE EXPRESS 226.65 48664 03/13/02 COS050 COSTCO BUSINESS DELIVERY 372.41 48665 03/13/02 CPR050 CPRS AGING SECTION 150.00 48666 03/13/02 CRA050 DANIEL CRAWFORD JR 60.00 48667 03/13/02 DAL050 DALCO SCREEN PRINTING 2276.79 48668 03/13/02 DDP100 DD PAINTING 975.00 48669 03/13/02 DEN010 DENBOER ENGINEERING AND 13995.00 48670 03/13/02 DEP150 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 35.00 48671 03/13/02 DES010 DESERT BUSINESS MACHINES 599.87 48672 03/13/02 DESO40 DESERT JANITOR SERVICE 4853.50 48673 03/13/02 DES060 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO 1205.72 48674 03/13/02 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC 4827.63 48675 03/13/02 DOU200 LES DOUGLAS 829.50 48676 03/13/02 EC0004 ECOLAB 60.80 48677 03/13/02 EIS010 EISENHOWER IMMEDIATE CARE 140.00 48678 03/13/02 ELM100 ELMS EQUIPMENT RENTAL INC 128.96 48679 03/13/02 ENT050 ENTERPRISE RENT -A -CAR 233.67 48680 03/13/02 EVA050 DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC 26090.25 48681 03/13/02 EXP200 EXPRESS DETAIL 1460.00 48682 03/13/02 FAL050 JOHN FALCONER 58.50 48683 03/13/02 FIR015 FIRST AMERICAN REAL 141.39 48684 03/13/02 GAT015 GATEWAY BUSINESS 2009.25 01 f 003 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 10:16AM 03/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 3 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME PAYMENt AMOUNT 48685 03/13/02 GOL080 GOLDSTAR PRODUCTS INC 342.25 48686 03/13/02 HAR010 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 19345.00 48687 03/13/02 HEG050 HEGGE ELECTRICAL 223.60 48688 03/13/02 HIG010 HIGH TECH IRRIGATION INC 67.13 48689 03/13/02 HIL150 HILTON FARNKOPF & 14863.52 48690 03/13/02 HOA010 HUGH HOARD INC 548.01 48691 03/13/02 HOM030 HOME DEPOT 1423.83 48692 03/13/02 H00050 FAYE HOOPER 100.00 48693 03/13/02 HOR100 DODIE HORVITZ 260.00 48694 03/13/02 IDE050 IDEA ART 27.85 48695 03/13/02 IMP100 IMPACT SCIENCES INC 6618.48 48696 03/13/02 INF030 INFORMATION RESOURCES 615.00 48697 03/13/02 JIF100 JIFFY LUBE/AFMS 391.62 48698 03/13/02 JOB020 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 82.80 48699 03/13/02 JOH2O0 JOHNSON POWER SYSTEMS 1147.80 48700 03/13/02 JPRO10 JP REPROGRAPHICS 1947.04 48701 03/13/02 JUD010 JUDICIAL DATA SYSTEMS COR 100.00 48702 03/13/02 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 14967.17 48703 03/13/02 KRI100 BRUCE KRIBBS CONSTRUCTION 8452.00 48704 03/13/02 KUS050 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 283.67 48705 03/13/02 LAQ030 LA QUINTA CAR WASH 41.85 48706 03/13/02 LAQ057 LA QUINTA GOLF ESTATE 300.00 48707 03/13/02 LES020 JANELLE LESLIE 6.30 48708 03/13/02 L00010 LOCK SHOP INC 197.71 48709 03/13/02 LOP050 RAY LOPEZ ASSOCIATES 65420.07 48710 03/13/02 LOS050 LOS ANGELES TIMES 48.00 48711 03/13/02 LOW100 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC 502.72 48712 03/13/02 MEE100 WAYNE MEEDS 226.00 48713 03/13/02 MIL030 MILLENNIUM BILTMORE HOTEL 378.36 48714 03/13/02 M00250 MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN 21643.40 48715 03/13/02 MUN175 IRVING MUNOWITZ 315.00 48716 03/13/02 NAW010 RON NAWROCKI 1500.00 48717 03/13/02 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 14320.00 48718 03/13/02 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 1031.47 48719 03/13/02 OLI100 OLINN MESSAGE CENTER 102.70 48720 03/13/02 OWE020 OWEN & BRADLEY 1750.53 48721 03/13/02 PAR125 RACHEL PARRISH 195.30 48722 03/13/02 PET005 CASH/PETTY CASH 49.20 48723 03/13/02 PET200 P F PETTIBONE & CO 171.37 48724 03/13/02 PIT100 NOEL PITTMAN 434.00 48725 03/13/02 POS050 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS 68.45 48726 03/13/02 PRY050 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS 158.00 48727 03/13/02 PUB100 PUBLIC PERSONNEL CONSULT 460.00 48728 03/13/02 RAL050 RALPHS GROCERY CO 124.99 48729 03/13/02 RAS020 RASA - ERIC NELSON 1650.00 48730 03/13/02 RCT200 RCTOA 95.00 48731 03/13/02 RES011 RESOURCE DIRECTORY 46.95 48732 03/13/02 RIE200 PAT RIENSCHE 315.70 48733 03/13/02 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS 751335.99 Oil 004 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 10:16AM 03/13/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 4 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT 48734 03/13/02 ROB200 SCOTT ROBERTSON 357.00 48735 03/13/02 ROS010 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP 54350.22 48736 03/13/02 SAX100 SAXON ENGINEERING SERVICE 3465.00 48737 03/13/02 SCI100 LOUISE SCIUTTO 175.20 48738 03/13/02 SIN100 VIJAY SINHA 736.39 48739 03/13/02 SKY200 SKYTEL 16.48 48740 03/13/02 SMA100 SMARTDRAW.COM 149.72 48741 03/13/02 SMI010 MARILYN SMITH 38.72 48742 03/13/02 SMI150 MALCOLM SMITH MOTORSPORTS 417.19 48743 03/13/02 SOCO10 THE SOCO GROUP INC 104.29 48744 03/13/02 SOU007 SOUTHWEST NETWORKS, INC 8417.50 48745 03/13/02 SOU250 SO CALIFORNIA JUDGES ASSC 610.00 48746 03/13/02 STA045 STAN'S AUTO TECH 722.86 48747 03/13/02 STA050 STAPLES 298.36 48748 03/13/02 STE003 M W STEELE GROUP INC 13735.64 48749 03/13/02 SUN080 SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP 471.57 48750 03/13/02 SWA100 AMY SWAN -DRAPER 569.96 48751 03/13/02 TKDO10 T.K.D. ASSOCIATES INC 613.37 48752 03/13/02 TRIO10 TRI LAKE CONSULTANTS INC 28187.50 48753 03/13/02 TRI100 TRI STATE LAND SURVEYORS 955.00 48754 03/13/02 TRU010 TRULY NOLEN INC 1375.00 48755 03/13/02 TTI100 TTI NATIONAL INC 7.76 48756 03/13/02 UND010 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 325.00 48757 03/13/02 URB100 PETER URBON 2862.96 48758 03/13/02 USH100 USHERWOOD & ASSOC OF CAL 21.08 48759 03/13/02 VAL020 VALLEY PLUMBING 48.95 48760 03/13/02 VAN020 DENNIS VAN BUSKIRK 1535.10 48761 03/13/02 VAN075 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOC INC 150.00 48762 03/13/02 VID050 VIDEO DEPOT 7.96 48763 03/13/02 VON010 VON'S C/O SAFEWAY INC 22.43 48764 03/13/02 WAL010 WAL MART COMMUNITY 122.23 48765 03/13/02 WAR025 WILLIAM WARE 11250.00 48766 03/13/02 WES009 WEST COAST TRANSPORTATION 682.50 48767 03/13/02 WES020 WEST GROUP 129.30 48768 03/13/02 W00100 DEBBIE WOODRUFF 427.00 48769 03/13/02 XER010 XEROX CORPORATION 4062.37 48770 03/13/02 XER050 XESYSTEMS INC 526.00 48771 03/13/02 YOU100 YOUNG ENGINEERING SERVICE 4969.21 CHECK TOTAL 11408,634.87 al'i 005 z O N r1 N M cr Lr) l0 r m 01 O 4 1-4 1-4 N —4 M r-1 yr —4 Lr) r-1 l0 Ol N H O z O M M U m IT T V V IT C C c c C C •CT C Q V W o w (� H Q O M o M 0 M 0 M 0 (M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 (M 0 M 0 m 0 (1) 0 M 0 M a m H F H H H H H H H E+ H H H H H F H M •• 01 o H z H O O O O Cl O O m O l0 Ln 0, O c O l0 O O O O O O O O O t0 O O O 0 U) 1.0 O O w z N t.C) U) O ri r-1 M l0 C' N M M N -4 m V' C' rl) N C' Ln m Q a 0 0 0 U-) 0 0 0 0 O N O U� O W U W U W U W U W U M W r U m 0 m l0 O O O v az a a a a� N U U U U U U U H H H H H H H H H H H H H H E-H H H H H a H H E 4 H z z z z z z z z z cn a z a rC a < a w a w a w a w a w a w a a Q a Q w a w a w a< a cn w a a a < W a W s z O cn m H O U) (n H O cn cn H O 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 O W m E-H O 0 0 0 EE-H O z " H O cn cn H O 0 C7 W U 1-+ H < a H < a H < a H O �-a O a O .a O a Q a O H a < a E-H MOOP a a a cn a H < a E-+ no .a a H O a H U z O U a O U cz O m m no m m m a O U W O an m co a O m a O U a O m m > z rx U O z O z O z O z O z O z O z O z O z O z O z O O z z O z O z O z O z O z O z O z O z O z O z O z O z H cn W ::) w> w =) w> w M rJ4 w > a ry m rJ4 D w m w n w n w w> o w> W n w a w m w> w m w> w D r." W > 0 w 0 w cn Q w cz w x w a w x w ac w a4 w cz w a w x w x W rx w x w a w a w a w x w a w U w W m m m m m m rn rn rn m m H O > O I > aG W o o I 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 0 i o o I l0 r-1 N I r-I N 1 .4 N 1 r m r-1 I m 1-4 I z H Q z H x Q U7 O r 01 l0 m r O r O r O r O r O r 0 r m m O m O m O m cV l0 m N O N O Q H H ,Y, z U') e 1 V' ri C' H r-4 O r-) O r-r O ri O ri O r-1 O C' r-1 -1 O r-1 O r-4 O l0 l0 C' ri N O N O a z < w m m 1 z O O H rJ4 rz W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 o o m r-i o o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O Q z r M r rM r M m r-1 r-1 N O N m r-I -1 v' M N -CT r M m -1 O N m ra l0 r r M M M m ri H z Q C' O O V' O O C' O O V' O O C' O O rr O O C' O O N O O O O Q' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ii FC r1 0 ri r1 0 ri r1 0 r 1 ri 0 . i ri 0 r1 r1 0 ri r1 0 r ri 0 r 1 r1 0 r 1 .� 0 ri r1 0 r-1 r1 0 —4 0 r-1 .� 0 r 1 ri 0 r1 r1 0 ri r1 0 r 1 U z 1--I U z F-I U z " H H F z o LO cn a w z O z O z O u z a a W a x H U U U 0 Q I FC o F w a a Q H a H a H H a H a H w a 0 to 0 cn 0 M U w W W W a H z a a U cn O cn O cn O to O cn O cn O 3 0 0 0 0 0 o H z x O x x m H U U u U U U u U Q Q O a c� cn m >• < Ol cz a W a rar w 44 >4 z >• z >4>4>4> z z z z H w > w > w > H O Q a z s w a< o U z a w h z z z z z z O h W W w ai z U z a v U H �. w vFi cHn z D O 0 >+ > r N Ln w (M Ln �0 v Ln � In ko cq:r Li)� ko�� c In c Uo In In w ko UO ko �0 In kD� %D Ln r UO w m Ln ko rn U) �� rn (j U-)l J } U U H H r-1 Cl 1-1 O r-4 O r-1 O r-I O r-1 O r-1 O ri O r 4 O 1-1 O r-1 O 4 Co —1 O r1 O —4 O —4 O r-1 O W W W .a W a W W W Uti W 006 z r tD r m 01 O .--1 N M cr Ln %.D r m m 9 N N N N N N N N N N O H z N O \ M \ N x M U Rr -;r a c O W H O O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O U' rC (M M M M M M M m ("1 M M M M M M £ w Cl H H H HE-4 H H H H H H H H H H M •• r O O O O O O O O CD Cl CD O O O 01 H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W z O m m m m N m O m O m m m O ur) x �:) C. V. C' V' C' M C' r 1w c' T N �r >+ 0 a N O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O C vm z N m m (n O m O x r Q r vT 0) N r-1 -4 >4 a r1 < H w U Un a w H > z o 0 cn 0 a \ 0 w a a a U ,.a a a H a a a a < < < H < FC FC H < < < a rC z H w m w H cA H a H w cn H cn H to H cn H Cn U) E-+ H cn 0 U 0 U) En U) 0 U 0 0 cn cn 0 cn 0 0 0 to 0 COCf) 0 \ 0 to W H o H EH H H w H H < < H U E-F a cc) coca 00 cc can no or) no can min 0 z U z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z H cn 0 w o 0 o w o w 0 w c o w o w 0 w o W 0 0 W a W 0 W 44 > 44 44 44 > Gu > 44 > L" C34 > [Z4 > E" > 44 > !_+ Lu > 44 > [u o w W W w w w w W w w w w w w w Cf) a a a a a a a s a a a a s a a w w U w m H o a CO 0 W r1 > i > CQ 1 N M v In m m e O r 00 r m z z x N m m m m r r M m CO r r M �D H H ::) O m m m m 110 m m m m m m m m H z N I;r -zr -M C' .4 v7 rr o O r-1 .--1 r q .-1 Cl) r-1 H x a z w ao w a 1 0 O w H a O O O O O O o 0 O o o O O c o w o O o 0 0 0 O O O O o Cl O Ln o Eo O O o O O 00 O O 0 O O v O z C M M M M H M M M 110 M ('M M M (M N Q V C V C V V V N V C C V' H Kr z O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O CO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U r� O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 r-1 -1 r-1 .-4 r-i .-1 r, r-1 .-1 -1 rH U z H U) M z o O O H Ln H a o r-4rJ4 Gw.1 tE ; m U) a w z o a o a s u a N w w w z Q w x x x z a w w z o H a s x o W H x w 0 w ao w U > U) cn U 0 a z w w w > U 0 O a " 1- i H >, m H U)z z z 0 a s cn W w W w 3 >a+ oa " F-I " a U m H 3 S W + x Q a z W H wz < 0 a a a < w H H U)z a H H a a 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 o o w Q W cn z U a a a h cn cn U U U a H G., w z 0 > rn O O O - N M M IV In m rn :D Ln tD l0 lD l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 lD lD l0 lD lD �0 0 >+ lD l0 110 lD l0 l0 lD l0 lD tD l0 lD lD lD lD U H .-1 1-4 '-1 1-1 r-1 1-4 .-1 H r-1 1-4 r-I U H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (� r U W W W W �a 14 W W W W W W 0 W t4f {ll� 007 z M ri N M C' LO lD r OD O� E4 Z N O M r-i � M x M U r r r o 00 o OD ao o co 0 0 o w E• O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U' < M M M M M M M m ( 1 rn f") M co HE-4 H E+ H H H H H H H H Ha a M • o O o O O O O O O o O o H O o O O O O O O O o O O o Z E-H W z O o o O o 0 0 $ m 1-1 l0 rM M LO N >+ O a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o O o O o o O O O o 0 o O O o ui x o a o 04 o n L i o 04 o x o �n x o 04 o x V' r-1 l0 M M t!') N -4 1-4C -4 ri W W W w w w 14 O >O O O O O O O U U U U U U H E-1 E-4 F-i H H F-1 F-1 a a a a a a U) a U) a w a w a a a a cn a U) a a U) a cn a 4 w< a F:t a Q Q < Q w< w I:t X4 W< w< w Z H z H H H cn H to H cn H Z H Z H to H Z H Z E 4 Z O O H O 0 O U O (n O fn O cn O H O H O to O H O H O H W H E• (n E•+ A H A H < H Q H Q H to H to H rtr H cn E+ (n H U) U H D a a a a a M a a o a H a a m a m a m rz U z U w U 04 m a m x U w m a m w m O H O O O O O O O O O O O O a A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Z U Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z H to w o W o w M w m (4 o w ::) w D w o w a w o w o W o w > w > w > w > w > w > w > w > w > w > c" > c" > w A W w W w W W W W W W w w a a x a a x x a a x a a w w U W 00 r1 O W N M > 1 > m I 1 r-1 m 0 -1 z z x LO r-1 N �T r-1 Vr V. N r OD a H A H A 110 O o 0D r-1 CAD 00 r-1 m M r H Z r N N Ln C r ul t0 A l0 O O r1 r 1 r 1 l0 -4 t! ) l0 H x �C z a < m W co x 1 O o w H a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 w o O O O O O 0 O O Cl o 0 m o 0 0 o Cl o O o O O O o E O m m OD r m �0 z r-i IH r--I (Y) M M ri e--I M H ri r-1 H z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O o o O O O o O O O O O O O O O O 0 U o 0 Cl 0 0 O 0 o O o 0 0 r-4 1-4 04 O 3 O H (1 o z U)O A Lin Q Q a4 H H H N rC F-IO W U cn z Z z O > 1 O a O W O H H H z 14 CQ-4 E-H H U 1W+ J44 O H OH4' � W 1H1 a z cn cn z U z Q 01 0: z H O < A a a U �C Z a U H w z U >4 2: a a o a FC U) u N z C9 E x w a Q a a w o a M H 44 z w a a o a h z O > o Ln l0 r O 0) O r-1 O r r r r r r r r r r OD co O >+ k.o ko w w to ko ko U H Iq ri -4 -4 r-i r-1 r-1 ri r-1 U H O O O o O o O O O o o O FC U w w w w w z w w w w w fy w 009 N O z < H - z O r4 N M m O -4 N N O M 00 r-1 v' LO t0 C- m m O r-1 `4 -4 N r 1 m r-1 M r-1 \ f'') O £ a' a W ( � 134 x U F Q 00 m O M H DD O M E-H 00 O M H OO O M E-F N .1 rr) H N ,4 M H N -4 M H N -4 M H C O M F OD O M H r O M F I` O M H r- O M H r- O [M H r- O M E-F t` O M E+ r- O M H I` O M H r- O M H I` O M H M • C) H z W x >+ H z O O O O o N O O 0 N O O o ri O O an V' O rn N O rn 1-1 O m O ,� N Ln Co Ql rn qzr rn m N ',D t- M O to o r-i N r-1 v v' 1n M r M ul M Ln .--4 N N . lD M an I- O OO v' M M M m I- 0o V' Q a o O O O o O 0 O o v an N sr tD 0 o �r a w U o -+ 0 an c a a > a., x > as a > a x > o N O Co am Cn rn m N U) z cn z FU-1 W W O HHHH O O O c7 z .a Ea-f OU < (D Q .a Ea -a U) Z- a U cn a E w a w a w a w a .a E �H+ U .a E a E W U O H H O E-F \\ U x U x O H H CO D O H fn Q O F 0 O 0 D 0 C] a 0 C) a O H x F H O F O H H O > a H a a O 0 W moo w a O co Oa a O U 0121 a O CQ 0 w 0 m 0 co 0 a O 0 3 a a O 0 cn W H a O 0 cn W H (Y) W H CO W H cn W H cn W H cn W H cn W H cn W H cn W H cn W H z H U cn W z w > z o rX4 z M cJ4 z w > z M 44 z w > z O c=., z W > z n I" z O [_., z O 44 z m tZ4 z w > w z z z w > a a a z w > a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a v) w w 0 W a W s w a w a w a w a w a w a < m a cn m m o cn o cn D cn 0 cn 0 v� 0 u� o cn a cn a cn U H O > z H W 0 I 0 • > z H a w no x D O .-4 O O a) N O N rH C' M N -4 m M e i Ol an M (- Ol I� Q' Ln N Ln to r� r- ri Ln OD C' M to U') O ko v' v m w r-1 m H Fc H x, z z N L LO N r-1 CJ N N N N N N N N N M W m I < ao a O O H w a W Im v Ln v c Ln v o O O 0 O O Cl O O 0 O O 0 Co O 0 O O r- DD o O O r C mOD M fM r- qw O r a m rr q�7 OD r v' mm r V r c m t- W O c- v' OD 0 z H I- M v r- M c lD r1 c (- M 1�7 OD r I v ri N c Cl N v m r-1 v Cn O �o O r 0 I` 0 I` 0 r 0 Ir 0 Ir 0 r 0 I- 0 I` 0 r- 0 t` z O O U Cl 0 O O 0 .O O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 O 1-1 O M r-1 an M cr) an c M to v M Ln cw M Ln IT M Ln I-r -W ac) v M a i a V' ai c M an vw M an v' U FC r-I O r-1 O r-i O .--I O ri O ri O ri r-4 O ri r-4 O r-1 r-1 O r-I r-i O ri ri O r-1 ri O r-i r-1 O ri -4 O ri ri O ri ri O r-I r-4 O '-I .-1 O r-1 .-1 O ri ri O e-i O U (M O 0 an a �C U) U H a a a a a w z z FC C4 x U w-+ E W a E z z wn (D z ww 0 U) W z z 3 �w O O 0 a z O 0 a z O 0 a z O 0 a z w z C7 H z O W CQ W a 3 n W a 3 0 W a 3 Ca W a 3 D w a 3 o W a 3 ca W a 3 0 W a 3 n w a 3 0 w a 3 A > 4 < a a 00 >4 0 0 < x a z 0 H < 0 H < 0 H < 0 H Q U) O U H a w a Q x a x a Q x a x a x a Q x a x a x a Q x a x a U) F FC w O z w C7 a C7 aW U a z 0 U >>> U U U mU Q U a U U Q U U a U U a U a U a z O O> U u O F' c) > N OD '� C)o N OD ko r4 M OD lO ri D Q OD w �-1 LO OD to r4 CD 0 OD w r 4 0 Ln OD lD �-+ 0 0 m to r-1 o O O ri W ra O O a a4 O ri O W u O ri O W u O r-I O w C) O r-1 O W U O r 4 O w U O r-4 O w u O r-4 O w U O ri O W U O ri O W u O r-4 O w O u 009 z Q C uO v 4 In r-1 lD r-1 r r-1 M r-1 r-1 M -4 N N N l0 r . (M N vT N uO N OD H \0 N (1+/ O F Z N O M r-1 \ In x M O W ( U F a r O M r O M co o M m Cl M m 0 M OD 0 M co O (`') c o M OD o M M O M r O M r O M N .-1 M co O M co O M OD O (") r O M OD O M a W F F F E-I F F F F F F F E-H F F F F E-+ H c (M • 01 F H () Ln N 1-1 r1 r in N O r r O O O O O lD O O r 01 O O O O O O M r r r H co Ln M O z w F Z In OD r -i -zr 1,0 O M N ri 01 In a a a OD H x >+ D O IT r-I in r OD OD N r r ri In N r-1 ri r H M ri N -1 m v' qw W M C' Ln aN rM M O O O lD O O r 0) O O O O In OD M M r O N r U > r� M c N r-I ra O r M Ln N ri OD OD C' M N co a Q LO N M a w a 0:C F a a a w a n a a cn a < U< a>4F:4 < x 04 E-+ a `� F F x E-1 O H (n W U) W (n W U) W U)� W W a O (n a O u H U 0z O U a O w H w I-1 z 0 Q a O (D a O a O a D x O > fn > z a U H a H a H a H a H a F-I a n z cn < o z a O U o z D w o z x (n x cn o z a w o z z "Z o o z w o z a H M W a w C4 w a Ca+ CL C4 C14 a, CL GL W > as W > H z H > W > F cn W > o z D z w > > < w > `.G O W > cn E+ (n F w > a w W > W C7 cn n D w D cn D M D M D M D w H c9 W cn H U z H H 3 H 3 a F O W D 44 < a w w U W H n z lD r In r c M O C' N \ 0) M O > I z > z w CO x v' In M r N lD M N M w M M -4 I N M N OD l0 r (M to v N (M N M r N r l0 OD lD N I O 110 O N H O H H D z l0 N r N Ln N r N lD N M N O O to c' M C' .--4 N N N H ri M l0 co l0 N \ N lD n x r r r r r r N O O lD lD a s N H z a a w w ao a I o o w F a W r v r C O O O O O O O O 01 O O C' O c' N a) M a M cr O O 1.0 OD C M C M lD O lD M OD O O Cl O lD lD lD un l0 lD O In lD lD lD 1p z M O M O (") O M O M O M O O) O 0) O M O 0) O M r I M 11 M (M M O 0) O 01 O 0) r 1 In M F r r r r r r lD lD l0 lD lD l0 H lD t0 w l0 lD z D M 0 M u) r Ln r In r In r Ln N O N o r Ir) N O ri O H O O O r-I O N O N Cl r-( o M u) O U V' T (M M M M in N (`') N un In O M N N In H U Q r1 O ri r-i O r-1 ri O r-1 H O -1 r-I O r-1 r-1 O r-1 N O Ln H O H H O r-1 ri O r-i r-I O In H O In e--i O '-i H O r-q ri O r-I r-1 O r-I ri O to ri Cl r-1 (n W Cn (n (n a U > U > U z U z D z (n (n M o H H U x Qz z Qz a H oO > O a 14 co > U) (n En cn z w H H w w w w w w w H a �� `� Iw Q Z H H a a O s O a �' O w O w F a z 3 common 3 3 3 3 3 H a D s D a s z o H o H M Q M H D z a a c4 a x (n H U w U w U a << F F F a U x a w a4 cn �+ a x x x x x x C7 cn U) r,r cn (n a H H H a a O n w U w U w U w U w U w U F U F on F CO o a a s s m O w w w U co z Q Q < Q Q Q FC Q C0 r� FC C4 F C- z O W > O O O O O O O O O O O O O Gc) O O O O D O �H O F U H -i 0 w U r-1 0 w U 1-1 0 w U '-4 0 w U .-1 0 w U r-1 0 w U O r-1 F U O H F o O H F o. In O U a O M a a O (M s s O H oo r H w �� O N w O N w In O o z O ra U Q U a a a a a a a s a a s a j 010 z Q r N m N m N o M N M M M M N M M M c M LO110 M M r M m H o N c M L M M N O p� F O Z M ri \ M O w (D x U F Q m O M m O (M m O M m O (M O CY) m O ('n O M m O M m O M O M O M O M O M r O M r O M m O M m O M m O M a m F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F M .. p� O [- z F O Lo N to r r N r O O Ol O1 O O O M O t0 O O N v l0 r-I m O O O U-) m N .4 m O O O W E >+ z O 0 N m M I m r m V O t.0 N m r Ln r-I O m %0 N 1-4 r O m N O O a a U) 01 In r N r O O Q1 O% O O O (M O l0 r T u) In M m N m -V O l0 N 01 m r Ln r-I In I!) m -4 H .Y. In O m C� N N F z R: F H z W a a W caA a W a a z a a a s a F z W z F O O H F F O F F a E-H O F z Q > F O F F O F H cn F O F z F O F Q to In F O F F O F �± F£L IU-I o Qa. fx ff o > cn 2 w cY. o W U) W O Q W. o 2 W CL' o F U CL O O U % o Q a w o (n x (n xI: (n (n x (n E (n x (n X (n E 0: o z �+ 9 z a p U z (z E w w 0 z Q U 0 z .10 w z Z w 0 z U p z O x p z 00 o z a O x% o 0 IX 0 0 (z 0 w 0 w o a z Q F H (n w > w H z w > :4 W > 9 W > H W > H > W > F (n G] F Q W > EU I- 44 H 44 " U4 H 44 " 44 " U4 H U4 H W >> z .7 (n p Q CL OI W x a O m F Ot W H U z H 3 (n z z z z z z z z o W G+ U W H 0 fti'i N m I z H p > z H m x =) m 110 l0 N O r N O 110 Ln -4 O V. O V' m (M r-I M U) Ln M Lo If) N Ln Lo ri c' Ln N M Ul N M In H m u) m -,0 Lf) LO N m H p z NT r-I N N N N r-I -4 N H N 0 (M (M M ro M M H M I!) M Ln M Lo M r CV) O N H x Q z w Q m w m a 1 O o w F LY, W pa O w %.0 O w w O w l0 v l0 O O O O m LO O O O N Q) Lr) O m In O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M V l0 � z u) M w tn M l0 In M t0 rn H l0 M M rI rn O l0 -I N l0 rn O l0 rn O l0 r . I tp r r I �0 r t0 r r1 l0 r '-I l0 r . l0 r . I l0 r �0 rn O �O F z p M to M tf) M Ln ri O O O e-I O r LO N O O M LO C' u-) r Ln r In (M LO C Ln r LO r LO r ul 0 U 4 .--4 r-I Lr) O M M N M V cr M M Cr-M M M M Q O H O .4 O .--I O LO O r-I O H O .--4 O H O H O .--I O H O H O H O ri O .--I O ri O H O H z O En Q a H >+ a >+ a >+ a >+ a >+ a >+ a >4 a >+ a (n O O E o 0 0 QF i o n W a D awaaa D a D a a a a a D cn Ln w w w a z U)a "o `n `n o Q a w a w a w Q x H w a z F (n X£ z z X££ a Z z X z c4 0 124 1 Q E-I E-I E-I x (n U W O U z Q 0 a p O w O w O w O w O Gu O Cu O 44 O Ga Q W F a z m H p W E-F p W F p W F Q m La m x >+ :D U H (n 0 m z z H H z H z H z H z H Z H z H Z H Z O H z (Z OW >Q+ 01 Q a o 0 0 U o F Un - O a fW Q F w E-F w F w F w F w F w F w E-F w H a Q a O 0 FPP D D D z Q m W (n W m 0 Q x cn 1 p Q o Q m Q o Q m Q m Q o Q o Q a Q (n F (u z W Q Q Q m p m m (n m U U U U U U U U U z O M > O (") O (Y) O (n O CV O .--I O O O O O O O O O r-I O r-I O rH O r4 O ri O r-I O r-1 O .-1 O a 0 >+ O F U H O F a O F '.� O F m O z Q O U W .� (n w N m 0 H C� 0 ri Q (n O 0 Q O M Q O a Q O M Q O 0 Q O p Q O 0 Q O p Q N a j Q Q U Q Q Q m m m m m m U U U U U U U U U Oil z r1 N r N m m O .-+ N M v M O M 00 Ln N Cl F . O z N M r-I \ r M x U r r ODN v c v 00 a c 0 v 0 v 0 r 0 r 0 CD 0 0 0 o w Ur < H < W o (n H 0 M F 0 M F M F CD M E+ 0 M H M F M F M F M H M F M H M H M H M H < a c M H O O Ln m N O O 0 r Lr) -( Q' Ol O O O O M N N O r O O C O O O o o z W E-H z D O m r o O M �D N o O a Ln r o O o M 1D r-1 o O 1D O Ln O o < a O o r O N O N OD Cl N o OD M 0 O O o O (n U) r OD 'T a o M r N rn v O r o o LL O r N Ln o H 00 HH Lo W I" '-� a a Q a a x 0 N 9 O w N H LU ~ w '-' 1-1 co w U) O (n co 0 a O z U z a FC EH W a a4 < H H z D co E-H a F a F W a Q F D 0 E H .4 z �C H H U) a 0< Z F c7 a z H H a s U) �C H w H w F a C a a H r>r K H O a a r>+ F fL 43 14 O H 0 H O W E+ 0 Lu a < O U F O F H a a 0 a4 F < O U E-H 3 0 O F H H O z F W a Q< CL Q; a4 a+ W a a 0 W F z U) 0 z F a 3 W cn U H O E-H a H a O U H a 0 0 H z W 0.4 W a w x 0 0 E-H 0 < a O 0 a w F< z a x 0 z 0 U) a U) O C4 0 a w 0 a 0 > Ix W O 0 w a W a W a a W O .4 0 D a c0 0 0 0 0 > z H OG U M 0 z W lz z W w> E D z U I-+ x> z W W C4 U> z W F+ `.L Z z W W F> z z H W (n > U z H G] x> w z 0 W > U H x U H x U H x U z H W x> N z F W H> x 3 U) w 0 > w x 0 w > w x a Lr) x w D W w > 9 H w > w > w > w > rz Cu O a w w U W H 0 z H 00 rn Ln r r am r �D o) O z I " 0 z> H w co E D H Ln �o o Ln OD O c N I O c r I 00 N r M lD 00 r Lii M O tD M NV Lo r-1 M N �-1 0 U r4 M U H [] z M N '-+ r .--I r h Lu h 44 r-1 Ln Cn f 1 m N OD N U U U C7 H x z a < w 0o a I 0 0 L*a H rn r o a [zj OCl r c OD r C OD rn C to o O O r1 1-4 00 0 O O o O O rn -T lD M N 00 rn C "D rn cT to rn C to C lD r A 00 O O z M O r M O r m '-1 lD dl C' lD M O r Lr) U') 00 r C' lD a1 .-i l0 M -W Q) .--1 lD m '-i lD m 1--4 lD m .-i lD Lf7 O �D O r lD H z D Ln Ln O Ln O 0 Ln O O O o O O LP) O OT 0 U C V Ln N Ln Ln (Y) L r I Ln Ln U') Ln N U < .-i O �--1 O r-1 r-I o U-) .-1 O .--1 N O Ln N O Lr) -4 O .--1 '-I O U-) rl O 1-4 H O Lo .-i Cl Ln �--I O Ln . 4 O Ln 1-4 o 1-1 Ln a' N H 0 H a z a< a< w M w u U a U) U w HE z H-4 z H z F z a U 3 o U) z H z H U z z 0 0 0 0 w >4 w Q 0 44 H z w H z w H (n E H 0 a a a >H a a >+ a a >+ a a >+ a a >+ a a a a I z 2: 2: a: o H > > > > > > > W H a z W H w H U) H U) H U) a w >> s w >+ a a a x w 3 I w D a W D oa U a O 0 0 U a D H H cn U) w x U W x U W x U w x U W x U W x U W x U a rC a U) 0 0 z a Q U a Q U x Q U x m U 3 0 U 3 0 U z w U < a U a 0 U 2< 0 U 0 U a 0 U a 0 U a O U a 0 U F Lu z 0 O W > Ln r o O 0 O 0 O 0 Lo 0 Ln H Lfi N lD %D \D r lD M r r1 OD 0> I U H U H N a rs M a Q< M x 1-1 x co O 3 0 O 3 0 O z W O < a O a 0 O Q< 0 O 0 O Q 0 O 2 0 O Q 0 O Q 0 1 �� rC U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 012 Z 0) O N I'o r M c M a' 1n %0 00 0) < M c v c a C V c N N V c c c a O H Z N O fn r-1 \ 0D x O O C' v OD 00 r r O 0D tT C' m o W U H 00 O 0D O O O o o O Cl o 0 0 0 O O ('j M M m M M M (M M m M M M M M a Oq H H H H E+ EE-1 H H H H HE-4 H F+ v� M . O O l0 OO 1n O O O V' O CO Lr) LI) 110 Q1 H Ln Ln c m N C' N O .-4 N CO O OD al "O Z W H Z 01 N r1 O M O 00 lD N Ln M ul to 1n D r to M co 1n m 1n M r O M r-1 N V' O v' OD rl Q' to O rl M Q O M r1 a r r+ O O O �0 0D u- o O O 1n O in Ln v 0) N c N O 1.0 O 01 N ra O M O O kfl k� O r to M 0o Ln >+ m u-1 (+') N un v OD Q �o o F• N OD M a W > H W o co a z a o c7 a a a a a a s U a z a a < < H Q Q Z H E+ H Z H Z H a H H H E-+ H M H H 0 o O o z o 0 0 o O cn o a o 0 W H H a H GG H W H " H H oG H FA H H E+ o 1U-1 a cx O Z E- a z a U w coH a 3 x O 04 a cn cn cn cn a cn cn O �-1 O U O U o < O no O 00 cn O O w w w w o W w > IY. 0 Da D p 0 z a X 0 x 0 z o p o H H H H p H H z U z x z Qx z Ix z H z O Z z z w z Z z a a a a z a s H Un W H W H W < W to w H W w w G+ w D W a a a a w a s w > cn > cn > p > z > cn > cn > w > E14 > a a a a > a a p z z 0 D H W W D D D D D D cn H H U U W h ax cn fn U)U) W C>+ U W r N 01 O M M 1 I H 0 (Y., O M .-1 O N N 1n LO O W 1n r 1 N O N ko ko c > I > 07 O O M I r M M Ol rl ri z z x N I u') r r1 a a x x M M H p H D O o �10 O p 0 p 0 0D 0D H 'z M V' M r Q' N r-i r-i r-i 14 ri r-i p o Ol ri to N O O O O o N N z a a w w w a 1 0 o w H OG N N O M to r i O O O O -4 O O (N W 0) m O LO r-4 O O O O O 1-1 O O O (p Ln 1n Ln Ln OD to Ln O O O 0o O O 0D E D Ol 01 Ol Ol M 01 O Oo ri ri M r-i rl M z O O O O O O rl rl O O O O 00 ko 1.0 H z N N r i N N M O O r-i .--i M N rl M D O o O r-i 1n 1.f) OD O O O 1n O 1n 1n O N N M r M C o C VV -1 N r-1 1--1 U u ri ri -4 .-1 r-i rl ri ri ri 1-4 ri 1-1 1-4 1-4 O O O O O O O O O O o O O O 1-1 rl rl v' r-1 H Q' .--1 rl rl rl rl ri e--1 a H >+ >+ W W w z z u H F-1 > > H H M z O O w W W O H W H (n Cl) cn cn cn cn p A o z x H cn H cn cn cn cn 1n oG E-+ H U a c1~ w w w. w cn cn a m a a a a x cA cA �C w z x w rz a a a a W w a 0 0 H w x x x x z z I U U Cn OG E-F W W W W H H H D a W cn w o w w w w w a� U Hr�� H H H W °° iZi a W UO O O a FC D O H 1x w O >1 U w 9 9� 9 00 >4 a U D w a U w z o 0 0 o U U < a a cn H a H o a a a a H H a O H x � z a o a x a a a a cA cn a 0 O O o O 0 0 0 0 0 O O cn z a U U U h U > U U U U U U U H Gu W z O > O 1n O Ln o O O r1 0 0 0 0 C 0 D N 11 M r-i tfn O O N 1n Kn 1n to 1n 1n O >+ O o O r-i O r-1 M O r 1 r i r-1 r-i O O U H a x x z O O o a x a x x cn cn U H 0 O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 O O < U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U K 013 z to r m m O r-1 u') o r-i CV m �r Ln tD r OD N IV C' C' Ln Ln N Ln tf1 N 11n N u") to LO Un O H z N O 1-1 (M ri M U r m m m 00 00 r V V V Vw v V cr v v O W H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q (r) M M M M rr) M M M M M M m M M fM Qa m H HE-1 HE-4 H H H H H H H H H H H M CD 0 0, 0 0 o r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 y r rn H O o r O O O m 0 o O Ln O o o c O o z H . W z o 0 u� In rn to N r r £ O LO %D r r 01 M 01 c tD 0) r Lf) r LO C' c �+ O r-r N m 01 rn N r M M w u') r V' a N M N a r—+ ri 0 o rn o 0 o r o .T 0 O r o O O m Ln c� x o < o H Vn V� 1; rn w 0 x m r h1 u) X 4,0 r z r 01 fM m m U U 0 m m LO M x .- I W N H 0) to 0) to Ln a m W W OD cn N Q a M Fi w x to U U c I cn a ri cn a O H N z z �a °a >4 a o o w w Q a U 0 z H H U U w z z 0 a a x < z �' w w fcC a W a a a a U U U U U r4 cn w �C Q 0 FC U< H Q x< a< a >>>> x x>< 0 0 z E+ E+ H .4 H W E-r z H W H O H H m m m m m w w H Q Q 0 0 x 0 co 0 0 O H O 3 0 x 0 O < a 0 W H H 0 H H H H w H O H x H a a a a 3 m a H EH F+ a a) z H `� a H H i-4 a Ix x a x x a x H x H H w W x W W O H 0 0 C4 0 w 0 U O 0 O O H O x x x x x x x 0 E E > x 0 x 0 U 0 w 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 O O O O O m 0 0 >+ >+ z U z O z z z U z 2: z O z 3 z H H H H to w H z O O H (n W H W O W w H w w O w W W H H H H m m H w a s W > z> m> E-+ > >> 3> 0> a> z z z z W W z> a s 0 W U H H 0 a >+ Q Q 2 x x< E E U co H U U �l m H h h D h a a �-D w w w cu U W � H 0 x C r N O W r 0 m M tD > I > m N r 1 I m N m r z z x N r r-I m M ri ri r1 r i N N O O M H 0 H a N c O m m m m m m m m m cr rn H z o ri O r a) N N N N N N N m m 0 r-i r N M 1.0 '-i e-1 r1 r-i ri ri r-i ri ri H x < Z a rC m W m a I O 0 w H x 0 o ri v 0 tD U-) c cr vw cW c y cr O o W O O r v O m O M M M m M M M O 0 O O in to O u) tD t0 %D tD tD tD tD tD o O O M 01 0� 01 O m a• a> 01 01 01 01 01 M M z O C 0 r-1 r O O O O O O O O O V' V r lD tp t0 tD lD lD tD lD tD lD lD tD tD tD tD H z N ri r i r M r-i M r-1 N 1-4 r-a r N r ri r-i a o In 0 Ln o o In o o In In In o Ln 0 0 O N M M M a) M ri N N N N m N M ri ri U U r-i r--I ri In -1 r-i -1 -1 1-1 ri r-i 14 r-/ r-4 r-i Q O O O O V' O O 0 O O O O O O O O r--I ri r—i ri N r-I r—i r-1 ri ri ri r-4 r-1 r—i r-i r-i U) O O 0 w U U H C7 rt W U U U U U U U 00 z U x h1 H H H H H H z z H t,7 H U > > > > > > > H Fi �) z x H z H x x x x x x x x x 0 O h z H cn W w w W W W W to (n O H H x b to m m to to m m H H LO a �' w a w cn x x x x x x x w a w 0 z w w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 54 z H O z H H H H H H H a s 3 W is C7 1-1 H H H H H H H FC U W z z H cn z z z z z z z z z W H z x H W z o Q Q< 4 Q a< O p 4 z U U m h h h h 1-1) h h U) U) cn z a W Q D FC a H W F4 H H H H H H H H H H >4 a W 0 0 a a x x x x x x x x a Q x to H U a m Q W w w w w w w w W w a rC 0 x z a z a w m U U w U U U cn U a Q a Q 0 W w w W W W W w W w w w U H w z w U n 0 0 0 0 0 0 n ca 0 0 0 0 n 0 z 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 Ln un in O ri in ri c cr vT c- qT W c. tD tD 0 >4 o O O ri O ri O O O O O O O 0 O 0 U H a .a a z a cn m m m m m m m U) m r> 0 w w w w w w w w w w W W < U U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 014 z a a o (3) U7 O lD N U7 M U7 vT U7 U7 U) lD U) r LO .-1 lD N l0 r-I (M O Ln M l0 -zr lD U7 lD 01 U7 O lD 4 %D N O H z M rl O \ rl m x U C C m 00 m m OD OD Q V r 00 V C Q OD OD OD O W 0 a H Q W O M H O M E-4 O M F O M H O (M H O M H O M H O (Y) H O m H O M H O m H O M H O M H O M E-4 O M H O M H O M H O M H qw (M Qt H N OD cT LO U') o 00 a OD O � O m o O CD CD 0) r t0 o CD LO N o O 0 O 0 O 0 If) O z W H z r-a I 0� 4 4 M rn o �� OD M o 0 0 0 0. 00 >H a D O £ r-4 0 0) r-4 O '-4 r N r-4 O m N r (V 00 00 Lf) N H m N OD N U7 r-1 O O OD c O Cw O Ul a N N r (M w O U') O 0:) O O t0 r \O U7 N O O U) O N r N O Ol N OD O lD r 7 Q O c' 1-4 OD N r-1 M m N z (D h-A 0 x O 0) O O l0 Q H W 4Y+ N � x a � (n Q a a x H a z Q U) va Q a a a a a a a Ha z o a a w s a s a a a a W z O H FC H E-4 O E-+ U > U) U > U > Cn U > U) U > U) F O H a H O H H O H W X >4 W H fs. H O H 4x a H O E-4 H z W H 0 F W E U F O H z H z H z H H O F U-I H E � 4 a W C: H U H U H U F U H w o 0 a oH U) a o H Z o a CL' o a O F Uo a Cx w o z x Q Z z a z a z Xw w U z � H z -1 U o z x W U z aa U U a U oz z C) rC H (f) W a a> W E-4 z H z H z H z H z> W H U) W > a a> W I W>> W CL W > H x> W Uu f24 H >> W H x H x H x> W W U) C] E W O U O U O U O U O U z H D U) tz a E 0 H �, W > W h H U W > W > W > H W f-4 H O a N N N OI lD O > 1 z > z W co x .-I r r T) N N Lr) r Lf) r 1 0) rf I m 1-4 ri OD u7 r O U7 rLr) N c w M r m m M l0 M H is H H x H D z 4,0 O r M v' q;r -1 vw 4 qw v c M .-+ r-4 O r-4 O (Y) o a\ rn N 0) O N m O lD LO Q' .--I 110 V' O l0 Im z a Q ao w ara x 1 O O 44 H a W o O c m qT M W m v M c M N m o O 0 O 0 O r c' OD r O o O O rn v 0) v m qw o O O Ln U7 Ul LO U7 LO O O O OD U7 O O lD lD lD O D z M V' 1.0 to O v) O Ln O Lr) O Ul o 0) O M O M O LO Lr) (Y) O m O 0) o 0) O Ol rl O) r 4 Ol rl rl �r F z D O r-4 O r4 in V' U7 m N H Lo N LO rl U7 N al v U7 m al v Ln M lD N O N N O N C' O ri Q' O .--I M U7 V' r4 O M m OD tD (n M lD O U) o LP) O U) tD U') r-4 U U r4 r-4 ri rl rl r4 H rl r1 r-4 r-I IH r4 r4 '-4 r4 ,-4 r4 r> O 1-4 o r-I O 4 O -4 O r-1 O r-4 O r1 Cl f-4 O rt O -4 O .--I o 14 O Q' o V' CD In o In Co U) O r-4 O U a FC a Q z H U U U U a a H H M z H x w H a W H FC < H z a U 1 U O U o CD O LO U) H a U z U z U z U z U z H 0 H O W z Q I U) U) << U) U) a 00 a H (1)U) H H Ui H U) H U) z H W Hz H z W a w w a H a H a H a I WE-4 z a a x w a x w a x w a x w a z w (n a a w s w a H w U) U) z << U) z H W COO E-4 w H W z o U a z co H Q D U) E-H F E-4 H H H F E-4 E-4 F H 0 D O a 3 O x 3 O x D o+ w H x a >> w W co U) U) U) U) U) a Q f:., > a a a r� a O x W U) a w U) s w U) (z w (n (z w U) (z w U) o U) a O z W U) z w U) U) E Z w F 4a H > o H > W a a W x a w a a z x a U) E-4 44 A z w w o w n w Q w o w 0 w o W a U fa F-1 W H W a w z w Q< o o x w x W x w o h z O D O >+ > O l0 O Ul lD O LO w O u7 lD O U') lD o Ul kD O O O N O o O 1-4 o O 1-4 O o O r4 O LO o O N O o to O O O N Co O (N O O N O U7 O O F U H FC U U) w C] m w O m w 4a U) w Ca U) w C] U) w 0 M O 0 O U W U) " W M H W E a w F z w << >> w w a x WWW a x a x a 0 < i— .. ,,, 44 015 z O l0 �D N M M M r �D OD lD Cn lD O r N l0 V' M M r-1 r f'n \D v7 lD N r Ln M \D M N O F z M r-i r-I \ r- M o W (� w x U H < x v o M F r o ('M H O M H o M H 0 M H C' 0 M F C` 0 M H 00 0 M H r 0 M H N M F c Cl M F OD Cl M H OD 0 M H v 0 M H r 0 M F r 0 M H c M O O O O O M -i O Ln o E-4 z W x H z a fM H -:T N p1 O N N ct' O O U) O O N O V r O O r %.D M In r lD Ln M lD O O f") Ln r Ln N q-T Ln M 00 O O lD u") r T .>4 a a o r-1 O N M M Vr N � M d' .--1 00 � r-1 M O O Lr) c'M N N O O O l0 M ra N Lr) O 00 Lr) C r-I a) o O N N M H z E-+ z In E-+ M z rn M N r lD O M O %Z N to c aD c N W W W U) Z 1 O H z a < E-, a U< > H a < E-, a < H a x H w x H a y x< H H w W m w a a< H a aC F+ z a w< E E-+ < a a Q E-H W O H O E-4 co 0 E-4 O E+ O a H a a O a F a v U O 0 H O E-H W O a F � W Cz O H H OH w a O x U O zW W O UWi a < O 3 $ Q a 3 O H aao cz O to a W O x H O Q z w a w O to w cn W cn w > Z H Cz U to Q z W to Q o z Cz W E+ 0 0 z a W W O Q: z U W 0 z 0 z C) 0 z z w zoo E-H U z Z a w "M a z a w 0 rn z M W O U c4 H << z O H z W H a a H a a H a a w Q > E., > w x> O > w =) O z O o> O w 1-4 lu > W a> a m> ao a H a W a> w a D a o a D U) W r-4 U 0 cn co to w a cn r>r Q rz x cn U) U) U w H Q O a W �D Ln -T r l0 rn O OD O 0 r-I 0 N C Lr) c' N In w m fM 01 M > I z H Q > z H co x O N ,--1 O M OD 00 M Lr) 00 r-1 O (n -4 O M r-1 O (M r v C' I N O 00 N N a) ar CU H N 00 lD �D On N C OD O N -1 O O .-I O O H Q H x z O N lD r r-A H r N r N r N Cl r I N O rl) In r to N M M M M M .--I N .--1 cr ra 'cr z a r� m w ao a o O w F (z W C7] O O O O O O r C OD N M to N M In N M Ln O O O O O O O O O N a Ln O H lD O O O O O O r v 0D r N m M M to E a z Ol O lD In In m M O r Lr) O lD Lr) O t0 u') O lD M ON r O c 01 O �D Ln O �D C71 O lD r-1 N lD H N tD M O r M O r M O r E-H z Q O r-i Lr) M N O In M In C r 00 lD r 00 r OD lD r tl) M O O O v In c CV O cr N o N r Ln M r In m v In V' (M In C M In a' U U Q r-1 O e-1 CV O Ln r-1 O ri r-I O C' 4 O Q' r-1 O C' r1 O r-1 H O ri .--I C� r-I 1-1 O r-1 r-1 O r-1 1-4 O r-1 ri O H ri O ri ri O r♦ .--4 O r-1 U z H M a U z H to W m W to W z O H L to U H H H < Q U4 a z U w z H a 0 O U O U) U O U) U O Ui U H L1G U H z I-+ Cz w a O .4 U z H U z H U z H I r� w F H a w to D o0 a a to Q to r� U) r� E4 U w H U w H x z rz < 0 a 0 cz 0 a H 0 E+ 0 H 0 a z M H 4 O a Q H w co �s U) w cn a W s W U w H 44 z rC O x O x O x as W coo a W s W }4 QI < a< rz O H to a 3 W H (n Q a H a a H a a H a x W U 00 C4 U x O H a x o x cD x U W W W E a M o z H w FC U O c� < x r.0 x x x x x x x x x O x O x o x H 44 z o a w > Ln -1 In r-1 0 O O .-i o r-1 0 IH 0 In 0 u) 0 r1 o L) O .-+ O ,-i O '-i o M 0 M 0 m O >+ U H U H O a H 0 H Q 0 a O 0 a < 0 a < o x < O cD W Co o W o ( H -4 a H o < 0 0 < 0 0 < 0 Cl x O 0 x O 0 x O < U ru C7 C7 x x x x x x x x x x x x x 016 z r M m M v m O l0 r m O1 v l0 N m F O Z O \ M r-I N M U r r m r N o W U' a F W o M H 0 M E-4H 0 M 0 M H 0 (M H 0 M H 0 M H 0 M H 0 M H 0 M H 0 M E-4 0 M E-4H 0 M M H M H -4 M E+ M .. O F z H O O r r O O O 0 Ln m m O O O O m O c Ln O m M m r M M M tf') v. LO .7 W }1 z O t0 1-4 1-1 l0 1-1 O O O l0 r N m ri Ln r M O V' N r-1 (Y) N O l0 r-1 N m M m 1n M LO 1n m IT O N N M N < a l0 M m O O O O Ln m m -r O O N t0 O m O m 1M N c r1 O O r-1 O N r N m r♦ 110 cn x U cn x U r r-1 m cn N m r V r+ H m x U W x U W x U z a Q H a FC H w U< z a H w Q< a 14 H Fz� m< a H o z D o z< D a H H z F z a Q E-1 a m 14 < H z H z H a Q H O O O Q O O >+ O 0 0 0 F-1 FH O t7 O 2: O w U H E-1 H m O H > L1 H z O H a a H m U m C7 H < x H E H m m H H O > a H m co W H cn W H m O Q H U D m O o FC a m O 0 H H Fri m O 0 Q x m 0 Q `.L U << ae U m O o W a W a m O 0 C7 z H m 0 a O H O H m O 0 co U) U)z U a a z m z w z H z H z m cn z U U z z z z W W w H cn W a a s a W > H cn w > > r� w > " > w > z H w > a a W > H x F-1 x w > z < W > w z w z W > H a 1- i a H a cn o D cn D cn z H oG H z H O a x2: w w W > w > a a w w 0 U 0 U 0 U W r4 U W H 0 m ri r+ o O o N M N M O I z > z w CO x IT O N cr O N 0 r M 110 r-i O t0 v �D CT C t10 c V �0 LO O 0 O M Co o m r N M cr) 1-4 M H Q H 1- i D z 4 4 -4 ,--1 1-1 m r N r 1n r N m N m Ln o O 3 O 3 O -IT O -T O Irr H ,Y, 1n 1n c r N N N N N cn cn OIN m M FC z a Q co w c>a m I o O w E-1 m W W 1n N m r c' m N 0) Ln O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O 0 m v 110 m v l0 O O O O v l0 r O w M Ln N O O 0 O 0 0 E O M M M lD ri (M M m m M M Ol Ol to m z O r O r O l0 cM r1 Ln l0 I'0 (V O l0 O l0 r-1 l0 1-1 lD C l0 O l0 O lD O l0 O l0 O t0 H z D O V' 1n C C Ln C N o N O 0 O c 0 I o 0 O 0 ri 0 -f 0 in 0 U') 0 r-1 0 N 1n (1) �O r l0 r m l0 N rn w U U r-q rH ri r-I r1 `4 r-q Q O -1 O -4 O r-1 O ri o r-1 O ri 0 .-4 0 r-1 0 1n O 11n o r-1 o ri O r-1 O O o U) W U) W Ef) E U) E 11 o z H a D z D U z E-4 to H cn 0 Un a cn W O cn W O cn W En 2: cn x H W >+ cn >1 cn cn U H fn U . cn U . F z m m Q Q m w w z w w I < W H H O H O x w a H > m W H U z 00 H z H \\ w co w co Q a H 3 00 a 3 s 999 0 0 U a z m H a W W s w w O O O x E-1 m cn H E-4 D a O s < a z z 0 zCL4 0 z 0 z a FC m W W x w W H Fc U Q m 00 m >+ Gu >+ L" cn cn z cn z W m W m W m a Q a O 0 E 00 E >-I < 0 O W 0 a x r=d z ru z U4 H ru H CO O x 00 x a a a cn H rsa z w x x rs4 w F-1 F-1 H H h h h 17 h F7 h z O D r' O M O M O u7 O O O 1n O O O M O M O O O O O N O O O O O 11 O -4 O O >+ U H U F"1 O x 0 O x 0 0 o O r4 m O O w 0 r1 a x O w z o w z r-4 w H r-4 I" H O aw O N x O N x O O m a O m s O N m as �•• �i U x x x x H F-1 H H h h h h h ►-� h h 017 z I� w 01 O O ri N e-4 N M C' LO 110 I` r- 00 00 ON O M ri r—i m M M ri ri r-1 r-1 r-1 ri r—I N N ri ri N 00 (V O H z N O M M U N N N N N N N N N N N r` r` N N N V' N O W H e i -4 H O O O ri 1 r-I H .-1 -1 ri O O -1 ri ri O r 1 0 a M (M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M s 00 H H H HE-4 H Ey HE-4 H H E-+ H H H H H E+ H HE-4 a c M r- O lD OD O r` O M 00 O M M O N O O 00 0) O O O) H LO M 0) M O O O M (M O lD �.D O lD O O a) l0 OD O M O z H . W z M N 0) r- O c M N O O ri lD lD ri N O \D �D r1 O l0 E =) N O O1 N O ri M 0) ri O lD c N OD ri qT M v C O >+ O O V' r-I e--1 O LO M LO M cn V) N O -7 N Cl) Q r-1 00 M ri LO M a c o C) I- In 0 0 0 ri o lD O O o %+ w r>r H x x r� N M ri o V' O H x Gu H H %D LO OD c O 0) r-1 h1 1-I M C a N x M > Gu [:+ c cn rn 00 a H H r..., 0 w ri x a a U H cv rC (D W w H H E- U) W O Q 0 0 FC FC rn x U) c9 o a a FC Q a s z z z r>r N H a W W H rn O 0 a > H a a x x a \ a H a z a x\> H H a \\ a H U a h4 H a < H < H H U A\>>< a s Q Q H < H < H Q z H < H M x> x rC U\\ H rn rn H a E E 4 z H rn H W 0 H o E-H H H o H 0 z< a O\ .a H Z z 0 x a x a o H z H z H o H W x x O H Ho E-+ 00 a E-I x U H U H H O O A H < � W O H a x x rn U U a x rn rn U U x 0 0 x x U (Z x A x H O H o 0 o H x rn w " H o z z o Ft o w o 0 U > x MMMMO z A H w w z H w z z A H H o A z A 90 o A x H H U) H" H H w d4 W W O Q� Q W < w w W x x W W H W A W H W a a a a> x> > 44 w A H M w w 0> (D U) > H> x> f++ > rn A O O O O < A Z x W W x H H H H A H W W z U)U U U U a < H U x A U x x a s a x > x H W k, U W H A x o w m �D > I > M r- N z z E M M N N C T r- Ln IO lD 0 0 to LO lD lD qT If) O H A H a O O O O O) N lD M M M M OD O CD U U N ri O H z V. d' c c• O c c• cr c v c c v cr E E r-1 r-1 N A 0) 0) (3) M N rH ri ri ri ri ri ri r-I ri ri ri ri Fi x Q z a r.� m w ao x 1 0 o w H x O M O M O lD N %D lD I'D %D tD lD lD O O O O 0) O N W O O O LO O MNMMMMMMM 00 OD OD c O M O 0 O 0 O 0 M 0 LO Ln LO to In 0 O O Io Ln lD O to J IO M Ln M M MUIMMMMMMM M M M m M M M z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O e1 lD (D lD lD lD l0 tD lD w lD lD lD lD lD lD lD %D tD lD H z lD OJ r M ri r-I M ri .-i ri ri r-1 r-1 ri C' Q' ri ri ri O N A '-i O M r- Lr) N O IO Ln IO Lo Ln Lo Ln IO Lr) O O O O O O r �D lD l0 ir) N ri N N N N N N N V C iM rn to O N U U r 1 . i ri r i r1 ri . i '-i . 1 r 1 r i ri r I r 1 r r H I ri ri 1-4 'A r� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (D r1 .-1 r-1 r-4 r1 r1 ri ri ri -4 ri 11 ri Lr) r-I x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z z 0 z z z z z z z z z o 0 U MMMMMMMMM H H H H Fi H H H H I-i H H P Cn H H H H H E-H H H E-1 U U W E x x x x x x x x x D D H r' ) H > > > > > > > > > Ex-+ H U U x H 0 U) A A A A A A A A A rn cn z z rn rn 0 cn cn fn >+ z z H H < w LO U U U U to 00 3 a U U rn M w w a a a a F w w w w w w w w w cn cn a Q a U O a 0 ca m o u w WE-4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H H H a a z o 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o x x M U) H H co H x x x x Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x z z w < :D a a a a H \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ >401 w w w w U x x x x x x x x x w w 00 M M a < x a a a a H w w w w w w w w w U U H H 01 01 w a O A z z z z z z z z z :D M U rn z a U) z h h h h x x x x x x x x m m x x a a h H Cu W z 0 > 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 O o 0 0 O 0 O o 0 o r o J ri 1--1 ri .4 ri O O O O O O O O O O O uO LO M u') N o >+ O O O O O ri ri ri IH 1-4 ri ri .-i r-I ri r♦ O O O O O U H a a a a A z z z z z z z z z H H a) cn a OI rn U H a a a a ,', H H H H H H H H H < U h h h 1-D h x x x x x x dG x dG x x �. a a a z O N N M N -IT N c 00 ul 00 1n N � (V r N OD N M NOD l0 o c'M 1-1 M N M M (M N H z O M r 1 � M O IT � W x U H N H N '-I N r-4 IT O IT O N r 1 N r-1 N r 1 N r 1 N v O N r-1 N N N IT (D Qa Q aU M H M H M H M E 4 M HE-4 M M H M H M H M H M H (M H M H M H M H M •• Cn E+ N OD r N r O O O N M O V' O O O O l0 M O %31 O O O O O o O O W x z D c 01 ri 0) '-i r-i O (N 0D V 01 '+ r-1 l0 N O O 0D r rl; C Un -I O O O O O -4 > < 0 lzr N H M r♦ r 4 M l0 f") O 1n 01 a O r1 to r O N O l0 N O O O M l0 r r 01 H O O N 0 OD IT r N O O 10 N !'M 00 r W > c cy; c O O O O a H fz Q L0 Ln N (Y) H H l0 r-I N M 1n ' 1 rrr U a IL4 H H x U H u H a < a cn a Q a < a Q a Q a Q >+ a a N (n a Q E H z 0 H O H O W 0 H 0 z O E+ O H O H O U)H 0z o H w H 0 H 0 z 0 z cD H 0 z x W U H H E-H H W E-H I --I H H H Z O Z O H a U E+ 44 < H w O H " to H U H (D E H O a H a O a O a z O a I -I x 0 co W (n W A4 O H U H U Z O 0 z O (n a O H U oz O H H cx O H > z (z U 0 z cn cn cn 0 z U M 0 z a U Cl z H a H a 0 z D cx O a 0 z z H 0 z U " 0 z D Z 0 z U W U w O z U w I-+ cn W W > x U x U x U w > A z W > to m w > a a a a W > H cn H (n W > Ca W > a CO W > H co W > h O h O W > h 0 0 O a O a O a a D U) D m D U)H z z H O a D a z H a a s s a a w h-4 w O a: r rn r- r 0 > I > W m M r N r N 0 CD ul O 1n O ra z H Cl H z H x a z ,--I r-1 l0 H r-1 �10 O N OD r-I N 0) OD 0 N 00 0 N M V N l0 Ul OD r 1n 0D r-1 0 Co 0 H x W 14 r-1 LI) O o ri N N N a z Q w ao m x 0 o H w CG W r M O O 1n 1-1 M 1n O O O O O Co N m CV 0) O O O O N O) O o M uO O O 1n O OD Ln O O o Ln Ln O O Un O 1n O O z H N M O M O Ol O H to M O M 1n 0) O 0) O r Cl) 1n O 01% O uO O 01 O M O H �o r r �o �o r OD �o � � � � � kD � z D 1-1 1n r in N Ln w 1n ri O r 1n r Ln N O N O N O l0 1n N O l0 1n 00 00 r-I N O U N m M I.0 N M M N N N M N l0 l0 v U Q -4 O e--I r-I O r-1 r-I 0 r1 r-I O tT ri O r1 O H O ri O r-1 O ri 0 r-I O ri O ri 0 e-i o e--1 O a w H 0 z Cl)U W z U z x w U)U H M O 0 a H cn W (n cn o o U L a zz Z U U) E H W z W z H 1a+ z N H �O U)1-1 a H H H r.>r M w w U)cn m w o x z La W H H 0 x a x a x c.7 a w a x O U x O v 0 w W 0 W w x H 0 H z £ U z U z o >4 a U) U)O 0 cn cn w z z z < a+ < a O x U x U a4 U >4 cn w 3 w 3 w z >+ W z >+ a a W a O H > z z w U H a w 0 w O a O a O a Q x O a o a 0 s FC 3 3 H E O a H 0 a 0 s H z z D O U 0 >+ H > o '-I O U 0 4 O U 0 ri O U 0 Tn O a 0 1n O cn 0 o 11 3 0 0 r 1 3 0 0 1-4 w Cl o ri w 0 M O a 0 u') N O Lrn r r-I z 0 r-I O 3 o r-1 O 3 r 1 0 ri U n/-V U < H U O a O a O a O a O a O a O s W 14 H O E D z z H V z ow'� 019 N O M ri LO M O W C7 M O O Ln a I W H 1-4 z [Q H Q � a a F:c a H rr.1 z O O >+ U E-1 Q U z cM Ln l0 r O m O r-I N M -IT Ln l0 r O m • M M M M M M C' V' �7' �!' c7' V' C' V' C' C' O H z x U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N E-1 r-I r-i r1 rH r-I r-1 rH r-I ri r-1 r1 r 4 rH r1 r1 ri M M M M fr) m M M M M m M M M M M CA H H F E+ E-r H H H H H H H H H H H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O z H . . W z O O O O O Ln Ln O O O O O O O m N O r c c r r t0 m C O l0 a' 110 N N m N }1 O r1 M M r--1 .-a r Ln iM 1.0 N ri m Ln (n a a W a O z F z Q O U U a O Q z W z O 0 O 0 a a ..a 14 .4 14 14 14 a i4 .a r4 14 14 14 a N U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U C . H H H H H H H . H H H H H H H ri z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W H F H H H H H H H H H H F H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H E-+ Q z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z H C7 C7 C9 C7 C7 C.9 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 F F H H H H H H H H F H F H H H H O U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Q W W W W W W W W W W w W w W w W z h h h h h h h h h�D h h h h h h w O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0> x a a w rz a rz a a a a x a a a rz a a4 aL a a a a a a a a a a a a a ri ri ri ri r--1 r1 ri r--1 ri r--1 r--1 r-I r-i ri ri ri ri r--I ri ri r-i ri r--1 ri r-4 ri r-i r-1 ri r-i r-I r-I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I i I 1 I I I i I r-1 r-1 r-1 .-1 r-i r1 r l ri r-I r-A r1 r1 r-I r 4 r-1 ri O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N (V N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O N N O O O O O O O N O O O O O O M M O O O O O O O M O O O O O O Ln Ln O O O O O O O Ln O Ln Ln Ln m Ln Ln o Cr M Ln 0) Ln Ln M Ln M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L.0 Lo lD lD 1.0 w �D O) 1.0 LA lD LD L.0 %D L.D l0 N N Ln r L.D r m O ri N r Ln N r-i r N r-1 O O O r1 ri M CO Ln O O O M Ln r-i Ln r r r l0 r r LD lD v r l0 r L.D cr r cr r1 r-I r-i r1 ri r-i r-i r-I r1 ri r-L r-i r1 r-I r1 ri O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cr C' •<r IT C' C' V' IT r-I C' C' V' C' r1 C' r-I U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O x a a a a a x a a x a x x a a a w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U H H . H H H H . H H H H H H H F-A z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z r-I r1 ri r-i ri ri r-1 r-I r-1 r-1 r1 r-I r-I r-1 r-i ri O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 rH ri r-I r-I ri r--I rH r1 r-I r-A r-I r-1 r-I r1 r-i r1 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z r N f) Kr Ln l0 r O m O ri N M Lr LP) m V' Q' ItT V' C' q' V. V' Ln Ln Lf) Ln LO U') Cr r r r r r r r r N N N N N N O O O O O O Cl O O r 1 r 1 r1 r 1 ri r i M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M F H F H F F H H H H H F H F F m O ri r M lD N C0 (`) m N m m V' 01 m r-1 0 0 r r1 v Ln m O Ln N cP c r (M l0 Ln N Co l0 I'D Ln M M O l0 v. 1.0 Ln 0) M Ln Cl ri OD Ln —1 r1 O O ri N r-A —1 a Q F O H cn cn � cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn � cn � cn x W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W O H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H Q a a a a a a a a a a a a a a .a z a a a a a a n, a a a a as a nL n. W a a a a a a as a a a a a a. a a> n U U o x:D x o M o 0 0 0 0 0 U) U) U) En(n U)If) U) U) U)Cf)(n U) En Cl) Q1 Ln Ln M N m Ln Ln Ln m O N cr') w Ln N M 0) N r-I O Ln Ln Ln fM N 01 N V' r-i M m O) Ln (N 0) W OD co m OD M Ln O M U) Ln Ln O co 1-4 N N N 0) r1 U) r-1 M c I.n Ln Ln O M M —1 r-4 r-4 ,-1 r Q' 'w —4 0) O N N N N r-+ N N N (N r-1 r-i N N r-1 Ln a") Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Lf) Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln r-i r1 ri ri rH r-i ri r-I r1 rH r-1 ri r-I r-1 r-I O H O O O O r1 O O O O O O O O O r-1 O O O O r1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r-I M rH r-I rH r-1 M M H r-i r1 ri r-1 r1 H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r ri M ri r--i ri r--i M N rH 1-1 r-i r-i r-i r1 ri Ln Ln O Ln Ln In Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln LP) Ln Ln m ri N rH r-i -IT r-1 C' C N N N N m M r-I r-1 r-I r-i r1 ri ri r-i r1 r-i r-A r-1 ri ri —4 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r-i ri r1 r-i ri H rH rH rH r-i rH r-I r--I r-I r-1 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a a a a1 a a a a a a a a a a W W W W W W W W W W W W w W W Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q W w w W w W W W W W w W W w W U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U H . H H H H . H H H H . H . . w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w r 4 r:d 44 44 r=1 441" ru 134 rJ4 rid U4 ry Iz1 U4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 r 4 ru rW G. E" Lu 1-4 44 rs.L r31 L" rL, G" Gu w Lu rc. ru EX4 44 W 44 U4 G.1 rzr rca r:.1 r 4 Gu G. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N r1 M H O r N O r-I (7 z H rY. W 3 U) a O a F z O U a H a M O ri M M co In 01 O M Lf) M —4 O r-i a W H z w U w Q U) U) W z z H a O O Cl ri H a O () -) -1 020 z m m r O ri N (n -T O m m Co Ln 1-4 N m m �n rn rn rn rn m Ln Ln Ln � 0) Ln Ln 9 a O H z N O M M U C' c N C C' a' a a' r N N N V' r r O w E-4 O O . O O O O O O 1-4 .4 1-4 O O O (� a M M M m M ff) M M M cn (") M M (n (h a W EH H E-4 H H E-4 E-4 E-4 H H H E-4 H E+ H M o M o 0 0 0 0 o r o Ln o o rn o 01 E-H O Lr) M N O O O O M O v O O Q� O O z w H z C l0 C O 10 M c m m O c D .-t .-a � r M l0 Ln l0 N m �+ O I'o a O M O O r O U') O O m r Ln () N M O c O O 01 N m m O C' O Lr) c r M l0 Ln N -4 r i .i -1 .� z O a ao ao m m cn w cn a z O a a H H H H H ,..a .-a .a U �4 .7 ra H .a c..) < w U< w w w w w FC FC < z FC aC a< > z H H> H H a a a a a E-4H H D H cn H H a H cn O O ac a 0 O o o O a 0 cn O o a o C4 H H \\ E-4 a H x x x x x H H a H E+ rC H H O H dG U E+ U U O m m cA cn cn O a a cn U H a a >> a H a FC rS FC << a co a E- a w a U 0c a a w O H O cn cn O U O U U U U U O w 0 U O w 0 O O 0 O x > a p 0 D 0 p H p D M H p a p p z p U z U z z z z a z >• >� >� >� >� z a z a z z z .a z M z H z H cn W H H W E• w H H H H H W a W E• w D w w w H W E• w z W > x £ > U) > H E-H E-+ H H > a > cn > a > U > cn > E4 > Q p p p z W W W w W D z o x w w .a co Q rC H a a a a a cn H > W H E a U W M rn H p a m �0 O W N z z x kD r- Lr) M N H C) H D 0) m -V r-1 N H H z O O m .-( O c O H `.G a z a � Aa w po a 1 o O w E-+ O N O O m O r W o o rn o 0 0 0 IT o m o O o O U') W o o to o 0 0 0 0 Ln o o m O Ln E D r r Or) M M r r a> M d1 M r M r 41 z l0 w O O O M M . 4 O O O M O M O N (V r r l0 w w %D r lD t.0 H z O O N N M r-4 N . 4 r 4 N N 1-4 C N N O O O O O Ln in ul O O O Cl Un O to Ln O O O N N N .7 T U) N N N a d U U Lin Ln .-i i N O O O O O O O O O O O O O H a D m z cn cn O U O UO O $CC O O O H z .4 U cn un x x x x x w H H w a a >+ >+ x m m m m m O x z >+ w rC w W cn < Q<<< W 2: w z a z �4 1-4 H U U U U U z z O O W 1 p p a O Q a cn U U a >4 >a >+ >a >+ al E a a a O H W H Q E-H H H H H+ H O W a a a z a7 m a H H H H E-+ H E-F W >+ a CD w PO H W W W W W H H > a a a a a a W a H a U cn i >+ O+ W \ \ \ \ \ a H H x < a z z x x x x x x .4 H p a a Q a O w w U cn m cn co m w W m w m a cn a p 3 3 Q a<< Q o o a a co z 00 UUUUU a z a 1-4 a H Cu W z O > O O Ln Ln 0 Ln un Ln O O O O O O O D N N N 0 0 0 0 0 O O to Ln O Ln N O >+ O O 0 0 0 0 0 N .-A O O 1-4 O O U H W W fL H E-+ E+ H H H H cn >+ Oq �4 cn U H 3 3 W W W W a, W a W a H o a rC U 0 0 a a a a a a a a a z M V' 1-4 N M C' Ln l0 r co m O .-i N m cT Ln �o r O m O r1 N M v, LO u') lD I'D 110 I'D lD lD lD t.D r r r r r r r r r r OD OD 0 OD OD a o H z N O M r+ r .� x M U r r N N N N N N N N N N N N (N N N N N N (N N N N N N O W H O 0 `4 r-1 r 1 I r I -4 -1 r-1 --4 r-i r1 r1 --1 r-1 -4 r-1 r1 -4 -4 -4 -4 -4 r A < M M (") M M a CQ H H H H H H H H H H E-+ H H H H H H H H E-H H H H H H H a' M O O 0 U') O O O N O O O O O N LO O O O O Cl lD O U') v O O H O O 0 (n r N rr m �D r OD 0 LD v' N M lD O co 0 r .-a U) LO O 0 O z H . w z Ln O u7 \D U-) 1-4 OD 0) r1 lD N �10 r-I Q) M M -4 N N r1 N v` r N N v' x D O O Ol v' 1-1 m m O O lD u) Lo O O Ul M O O Ul O OD N M r-i to N >+ O lD v' M O U) r--i O c v' r-i OD r c r O M v' (M OD N N U) C LO < M �.D lD w m O lD M .--1 v' m co N O Ul %D N N OD O 1- a Ol r 1 r 1 r I m N N r- r-1 Ln -4 ri r-1 r-i O O U') O O 0 r O In l0 H M ri Q N O >+ O U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U H N > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > U z Cn U) U] V) U) V) U) U) V) U) Ul U) U) (!) V) U) Q H H H E-I FI H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H U v a a w a a h z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z > > < z Q Q < Q W w w w w W W W W W w W W w w w w W W w z U) U) H O E-+ H H H cn E E E E E E E E E O O H O U) O O W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W" x x H H H x H x H w U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U H U U H w O Lu x cz a x x x x x x x x x x x x x a x x x H a W W x x > x H x 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O H x x O H O I-i O U O 0 Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Iu Lu > x U U Q O x Q D 0 z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z U z M z z x z H W W w w W w w W w w w W W W w W W w W w H U) z z W CO W N G] H W x W > r> > 0> U) > 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Q a s a 0 z O<<< Q< Q Q Q<<< Q<<< Q Q 4 Q< a s U N H m a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a W Lu U w N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m OD OD H 0 (z M l0 �10 N N N N N N O m OD OD O W M 0 Ln U1 0 Ln In In In Ln Ln 0 Ln u) N u) In In Lo Lo N > I > CQ r-1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N z z x M Ln ri .--I r-1 r-I •--I r1 ri ri ri r 4 r1 4 r-1 r--1 r-i r1 r1 r-i r-I r1 r 4 H Q H lD O I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I H z M v' r1 N N N N N N N N N CV N N N N N N N N N N Q N N O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O H x z a < w as w a I 0 O Lu H x r Cl O O N v m OD O N m w N r-I M M O N M OD to 4 Ol OD Q) OD w LO O 0 0 m r u) r r %D to 1,0%-0 r Ln r r lD to �D ,o r In r %�o kD m LO 0 (D 0 Lr) In Ln uo 0 Un Ln Ln 0 u-) 0 In Ln Ln uo Ln o uo Lo o o Lo D Ol M r ri rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn z O O (M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O to \D �D l0 lD lD lD i.D to to 110 lD %D to H z N N U') r N ri .--I rH r-+ ri r-I r-4 r-4 r-I ri r 4 r-1 r-4 r-4 r-4 r-i r-i �l r l r4 O a) LO Lr) O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v IT M N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M U U H r-i r-1 -4 r-i rH r-1 r-i r-i ri r-1 r-4 r-i .1 r1 r-1 r-I .--1 r 4 r-4 1 ri r l r-i r-i r1 Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r-I ri r-I r-i r-1 r-I r-1 r-1 ri ri rH r-I rH r1 r 4 r1 r-I r-1 r-1 r-i r1 r-i r-1 r-I r-1 r-i Lu Lu Lu Lu Cu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Iu Lu Lu I" Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu W Lu w Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu Lsa Lu W Lu 44 EX4 Lu Lu Lu W Lu CU Lu 44 H H i--1 H H 1--I F 4 F-i H H I --I F-1 H H H H F-1 H H H H a a a x x x a x x x x x x x x x x x x x x w w w W W W w W W w W W W W W w w w W W w x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x M z z >+ 0 o O x 0 U) U) 0 >+ >+ >i >4 >+ >+ >+ >1 >i >H >i >+ > >i >i >i >+ > >+ >i >+ U a s H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H a+ w W U z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z FC z z w O D D O D D O O D D O D O O D D O O D D D a w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I U U H x U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U FC " H Q U W F+ x (Z u) w w W W w w W w w W W w w W W w w W w w w a z w w w z Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 0 LQ 1"1 U W H H H H H H H H H 1- l H H hi F-1 F-i H I- l H H F-1 F-I >• 01 a D x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x a x Q a 0 o w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w a rC O U) U) H U) H > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a Q Q U w Q H F-1 Fi " H I --I H H F-I H H 1--1 hl 1--1 H I-1 V-A H 1--1 F-i " m z x x x a x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x H Cu w z 0 > o 0 0 -1 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 O o D N N O r1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O N O (N ri r4 ri r-i 4 ri rH ri ri r-1 r-I r-1 -4 r1 r-1 r-i ri -1 'A U H U) U) H U) w > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > U I"I U w H H H H H H H H H H F-1 I- l H H I- i H H H H H H H a U x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x z In t0 r co m O r-I N m T In t0 r OD m O r-I N m v' In tD H N M v Ln t0 • 00 00 00 OD 00 M M M M M M M M M M O O O O O O 0 O 1-4 r-1 r-I ri r1 ri ri F z N O M r4 OD � � M x U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N t0 to t0 to w w O W H -1 1 r1 r1 r1 r1 11 -4 r-1 1-1 r-I r-1 ri 1-4 r-1 r1 .--1 O O O O O 0 () ('r) M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M (Y) M M M M x H H H H H HE-4 H H H H H H H H H H H F4 H H H H H H H H H Ha c M O N O O O -i O r 1 r-I O m In r O O N N ('M In OD OD O O O O O O O O\ F 10 O O O O r N O O In 7 r 10 O O OD OD O� Lt (Y M O O O O O O O w z 1-1 0) O0 0) Un r N v r 0 (`') OD r O O N N N l0 C v' O O O In O O O E M O OD t0 x 00 r-1 to r OD r OD M `4 O O 00 O0 M O O O O N r In v' x O >� O OD M r1 11 t0 O OD r--I In .--1 In M r to ,o Lo in N l0 t0 l0 OD r-1 r v' r-I N r a r1 m O N 01 O N 1� r z z z x E O M M E E O O () a s Ln F o r > > 2 >+ ?I 0 i 4 F-I "H (n (n H (� o a E (n M M M 0: z H H 3 3 3 a H H I--1 H H z 'Z. (7 (7 (7 H F z (n (n O O O O O (n (n (n w 0 0 0 0 0 z z a a Q cn ao a a a a z >1 >I > >1 H H cZ x z a U U U U U U W W Q < a 0 M w w w w z o a a a a 0 0 a a a 4 > > > > > > z H E+ a cn (n O w < < Q Q z z E+ cn cn m w (n (n O W W O O x x x x H x z z z z +1 H (7 C7 0 O w H U U E-+ WWH (� H H cn cn to (n �C W r!+ rC r� rtr x x z z z H x x J4 a4 a4 JG w I-q w 0 0 z 0 � a w w U U U U a U U U U Q Q w w w Qx w w w w w w O 11 11+ k+ O U U O OEM U W H H H H 3 3 0 0 0 0 x x x x x x > z z z 0 0 0 0 rt (n cn H H H H w h x E x x-�"1 0 0 0 o U U U U U U z U W W z Z cZ z cn cn w w w w x 0 0 0 0 (n (n x x x z H (n w H H w x W w 0 0 0 0 x z z z z W w w z z z z z z w 3 3> (n (n > H w (n O o 0 o 3 H 0 0 0 0 .a a 3 3 3> < Q<< I< 0 << z z OD (n (n O 0 a a w m 0 0 0 U H H W W w .4 a s I4 a v << W m m m Z- W w W W x x z z z Q, a a a a a4 W Gu U w OD 00 N N N N N N. N N N N N N N N N N N H 0 (Z 00 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O (,j In In O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O M N r+ O m sr > I > m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M N M z z x .1 .-1 .-+ r-I r-1 r1 H r1 F1 H M I I z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z I I I I 1 I H z N N FC Q Q<< Q<<%:4<<<< 2<< Q< N N N N N N 0 0 0 h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h 0 0 0 0 0 0 H x � z a rC aq w w a I O O w H cx In .-4 N N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r r r r r r w to r ON 01% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v c v v a W OC1 Ln In In In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o In Lrn Ir) In In L) x O 0) m m O% M (Y) m M M M M () (r) (`) (Y) M M (M M M M M In In al Ln al Ln z O O O O O O Cl O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O t0 l0 l0 l0 l0 tD l0 tD t0 l0 lD t0 l0 tp l0 tD l0 t0 tp lD lD t0 l0 t0 t0 w w t0 H z N N to M t0 N m In t0 N w N to M w Lr) 110 M 110 M RT v v' D O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O In In In Ir) In In O M m N N m 01 01 m 01 01 a% 01 m m m m m m m m m m M M M M M m U U r-1 r-I ,-+ r 1 �o In w Ln In to to Lr) to Lr) to In w to to In to Ln r-1 1-4 -4 r-I Q O O O O v IT O v' O c 0 c O 0 T a O c c c -�T O O O O O O 11 r-I -1 r1 N N N v' N v' N v' N v' IT N N v' N N N N r-I r-1 r-I r-I ri -4 G+ k+ U U U U U U W 124 H H H H H H F-( 11 a, a a a a a a a as as a a a a a a a a >>>>>> z a a a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o a a o 0 0 o am a z a a W w O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w w w w w w x x o: x cZ o: a cZ o: a rz oc a rx rz a a a o: o: cn cn cn (n cn (n M (n (n U' C7 C7 C7 C9 C7 C9 C9 (7 (7 C7 U` C7 C7 C7 C7 C9 U' 0 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 o >+ >1 x J4 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x z z z z z z In H H z z w W W w w w w W w w w W w W W w W W H H H H H H a z z 0 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U z Ds w x a x O O H H > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > w w w w w w U U x x w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w z z z z z z �. W W a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a H H H H H H w H W W Da ro w w (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n w (n (n a z 0 0 O O z z z z z z OC1 H " 1--1 a 01 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 w w W W W W �C o (n (A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >+ a W fZ H H z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z �C a W W H E-I w W W w w w w w W w w W w W W W W w O O O O a r> O > > O O (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n w (n (n (n (n x x � Xx 17 0 H H U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 z w (A (n a (Z o: a a x x o; x x x x x o: a s o: a (n (n (n (n (n (n H w w z 0 > Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O r1 .-I r-1 r-1 r-I r-I -4 r-1 r1 r 4 r1 r-I r-4 r-4 r 4 r-I r 4 r-1 0 O O O O 0 O >1 r-I 1.4 N N O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O rx1 r1 r1 H r 4 r-1 U H H H O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fct U a x a w a (Z z w a z a Pz a w z z a z a a x w cn cn (n cn cn (n 023 z O r O r1 m N r I r N LO ao O ri m O e-1 00 lD LO O I .-+ r i O -1 .4 4 N H O\ N .-4 N O Hz M M Co W U H N r-1 N .-1 lD O r O N e 1 N 1-4 lD O r O \D O lD O N r-1 N —4 N r 1 lD O lD O 0 a CA (n H rM F M H m F M H M F M H M F M E-F M F M EE+ M F M F M F M H c M 01 E+ O N O O 0) M m v N r N r 0) .-+ N O O O U7 Ln N 0 O Ul r O O U7 M O z w H z O L� N o LO 10 M l0 .-i rn C m M r r l O M O r lD M o r+ c Ln }� O r 1 r d N O a ('M M l0 O O m m (N N O) 01 O O O lD N u� r x 41 M rf) V . 1 r rn c r m M -4 I` N c O 1n I� O o c M F z H r a c m lD x a 0:4 a < H 0 3 as a < a r>r a r1 F a H Q a < a a. w H > w H > w H a > < U) a a. x H 2 O F O F O \ a F 0 F o E-H O E-H O F O a E-1 o U >> U x w x w x H w 0 w (D F O RC a W H H x x F w H H E-H H w F W F cn cn cn cn cn H 0 H W � " O+ a x O F4 U P U a O r>� x D: O > cn a O w x rz 0 w x U 0 >4 a O 44 W O w w w w x w x w a a w 0 h x O w > z x U 0 z D x 5 x 0 z H 0 z x 0 z < 3 0 z (D < 0 U z x 0 Z a w 0 z E+ a E-H a F a F 0 F 0 a z w 0 0 z a U H cn W w > F m H co w > m H w > w U w > E-F G+ w > w a w O > E-F w > cn w W > a, x a x a x a x a, w x > a fz w > H x U) 0 z H z H W x < a, O cn 1+ O H 0 O U O U O U O U O U Q a W > w 44 U w H 0 O x 14 rn o q m l0 w r m l0 m M LO lD m�o N m > I z > z ai x LO N M m U-) O N O N 4 N ,-4 N O N to LO H 0 H H O z U N 0) Ln Ln 1 cV I N I N I N I N N a' 0 H ,Y, O O) N O O O O O rI FC z a4 < co w w x I O O 1" F x w N rn N m o O 0 l0 0 0 o o m r lD 1-4 o r-I-1 0 0 r-, 0 r 0 r LO rn a £ LO LO O l0 O O LO l0 l0 l0 l0 lD l0 l0 l0 :D z m o l0 Ol o lD M O 1.0 N M w r-1 o r-1 c 0) o m .-+ 0) O 0) o 0) 0 m 0 0\ 0 (Y) l0 ON 1-1 H z 0 N O (N O N O ('M U) r 1-1 a) lfl N O w '-1 O l0 Cl lD N O l0 cV O lD N O lD N O lD N O l0 1n l0 14 O O U N N ri .--1 M N M V) vn U7 Ln U7 to N U-) U a O 1-4 1-4 O r-i -4 O '-A O r-1 O r-1 O r-1 O e--1 ' i O LO N O u-) N O In N O Ul N O Lo N O 1n '-i O r 4 O to U) H O z z z z z U cn a a U) x H H H . . U) w o O F U z to `.� cn A4 cn A4 cn �4 cn �4 C7 0 O Ln O x H x 'O x O x O x O x O a h x U a o H o H E O x H x H O H w H w H w H w H w Q H H I D D rC U H H x U z z z z z z O W z u u H 3 EEn U) HP H Hp O ~ Q w H FC >+ 01 w cn w to U) >+ a w 0 H z >4 a x a O o O cn w 3 x w S x w 3 x w 3 x w 3 x a r•C cn - rr+ a x H H o rtir F x H U H F F H E-H U z H C-4 z w o > U) E E E E o E U) z 0 0 O ? > O O .+ 4 O O .--1 o o 14 0 O N o o -4 O r 1 CD o U-)r1 .-1 o O r 0 O r 0 O r 0 O r 0 O r o O o LO N LO v O U H U H V-1 U H U z H >+ J4 H x 1--i x U O 0 O 0 O m O an O O O a �y H Q J! FC U cn cn cn U) cn m cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn co 024 Z • M ri m r-i %l0 r-1 V' r-1 U) ri r Ln V' r-i U) ri to ri r ri OD r-1 01 ri r ri OD 1-4 OD U) cV O H Q z -4 -4 M r1 O \ N M O W (D x U E-+ < UJ O M N •-1 M N r 1 M N r I M N r 1 M r O M l0 O M O M O M O M l0 O M tD O (") N ri M N -4 m r O (M a m HE-4 HP H H E-� H H H H H E-� E-+ H M rn o H z E-a V• r N O U) r l0 M Nr � r L \O rn r M O o Cl o O LO O o O o l0 r . O o w x >+ z ::) O U) N V' 1-41-4Co 01) 1-4 u") m N U) M r r1 r C' rn U) M to N N V' r r r OD m U) U) 01 U) r M r N M a Sys (S M r-1 r-1 r m r 4 r-1 OD M c r Lr) rn r M o Lr) O o O o r N N OD (7% U) M r-1 cr z O m kD U M 14 r co H E-+ U7 LO U) H U) r r r N r V• U U) fZ w r-1 FC, rn M W 4 Cl) O 44 x H z W N H 44 H \ W U z Q H cn cn U) W cn U) U \ U U W > E H Ca w 0 a a a a a a x .a < W U a Q H > a a U > U > U > a a W a < z O< a (7 a Q a < z 0 a, a a H 0 H 0 E-4 O fZ a Ey 0 z W H O H U E-a O cn w cn H O Z H E-+ O H H H O Z Q E-+ O x U W U H H W Qz W Ix W w H E-H U > H a H a x H 01 H Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 H a H z W H a H z H OF-4 a w w w w 0 cn W w O cn !z O a W z O w cz O a --'0 z H H H H H H a' O >+ H z O > w a 0 cn cn a O 0 H > z a U a U s U .a U o z H a 0 z z U o z O LU 0 Z a W o Z z u n z U w U w U w o z cz w o z x a o z W $4 o z < a H cn w H x H H x w > a a W > H cn w > c7 W > > �C 9 W > hi (n W > a m a m a m> W a O w > \ U W > W z> W a cn C) W > W > W > O U) W n z U H W o z H z H z H Z a > cn H 3 O a w rJ4 U W H n a o rn OD M N o o rn O > ( z > z w m x Ir �o 0) M r N VT o OD OD (N U) OD r rn cw O O 1 r cM 0 M o N H Q H H O z N V' M C Cl) r-1 O O z O ri ri (Y) r r-1 N r-1 ri U) r OD U) r W U) r OD U7 U) M w to O O O M 0 N O H aG z a Q m W co x 1 0 0 [_+ H rz w rn V m c 0) V' o O o O a o O N M o O o O kD U) 0 O 0 0 0 lD Ln m (TJ to tD w O O 110 O U) O O U7 O O lD U) z m 'A l0 (3) ri �0 m r-1 �0 rr) O r U) O l0 m ri lD r M l0 U) O lD a) O �0 a) O lD m O iD CIl O 'o r1 N lD U) M lD CT O l0 H z Q H' O U) i O U) ' O N 1 U) N N O r ri O U) r+ U) r 1 U1 M w l0 U) N 14 r N Lr) v l0 U) l0 N O N M U) .-4 N U) V U U < ri o U) ri 0 U) r-1 0 U) 1-1 0 ri r-1 0 er 1-4 o U) H O r-1 .--i o V' r-1 0 VT r-1 0 IT ri o '-d ri O v r-1 0 -4 r-1 0 1-4 r-i 0 r-1 z z z a H w U a O z H M H (n H (n O W a Q M o 121 H w z z z Z U 0 U) a pC U W x U W x U W a O O U) W U w W W H F a O H a D H a O c M U z U z H > C4 W �C H H H a H a a a H cn cn co z H (n FC W H 0 H D 0 E-H O 0 H O W .a w cn C] I 0 CO to 0 U 0 U 0 U a G] z w a z O o z D a z ao H r>: O r>r cn 0:4< cn In U) W w H w z a 3 x �C x Q x Q H Q H O z H H Q 0 a C7 Q a a 2 2 2 a U) a Cn C% a �l 4 U) >+ z 04 a r>r a cn O m z Q H w Q E-4 cn < H to < E1 w 3 z a U) H H x H 1--1 cz H F-1 cz H H z H O 0z H F-1 H H 0 z H lu z O W > In In U) O M o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O >+ U H O 4 0 :C 0 < O < O W 0 z r 1 /C O Ca O H O H O H ri H O O ri H O O 3• U H FC U H co H co F4 (n H cn H to a to 3 (n a4 H a H s H m H a E-H a H H H z O 025 z • 01 Ln O N M N v N U7 N %lo N r N Ol N O (M r-4 Cl N M N O H p z r-1 r 1 M � r-1 \ N M O W x U H r O l0 O N '-1 N .-1 N 1-4 N r-i N ra N .-1 N N r O N QLL < co M E-4 M H M H M H M H M H M H M E 4 M H M H M H M E+ c M O) O H z H l0 (n QD O LO O) O r1 O O l0 O) M V M N Cl O O U) O M O O w E >+ z a O N %D OD N aD v U7 M Lr) O Ln r N N N N O LO cv N OD to O� N r N <P a N -1 •--4 ri O O l0 m OD O L O) O -+ O O l0 a) M V M N O O O N O M U) N N k0 N co c Lr) Cl) O Lr) r N N N N a4 O Lr) N OD O) N M OD N Lc) r1 . 1 e 1 U N l0 A x E-H z 1-1 U a a �C a < U) a w Q a < a C) > a FC u) a Q a Q a Q U h1 a Q z O a FC a Q z O H 0 H 0 (7 E+ cZ 0 H 0 E-F 0 U) H O a H O H 0 H 0 > " H O 1-+ H H O W z E-1 0 U H H H H H O HHH H H \ H � H H a0 H 0 a 1+ x o x x o U x 0 U) x O H U fx o W x a 0 W x 9Z 0 cn w x o U) w rx 0 AG a x 0 Z 0 a 0 w x o H U > z x U A z U) H A z w A w z rx A z A a A z U A z O A z " a A z H a A z O a 0 z w Cf) A z A O A z 0 a F+ cn WA W a W H W a0 > Q W H W z a w w A w a4 W a4 � W W z a W U (4 H z U) a) O U W 0: z> 1-1 Oa > M V) co Q H Q UEu H U W H A a M OD p > 1 z > z W CA x w N 01 v M 0 O c rn ri U7 N Ul rn CO N H 0 H H M z l0 OD N r+ r I'D O) o M o l0 OD .-1 O A H x O r1 N M M N OD Q z a a m W o� a 1 0 O w H fx W fYi O O O O O O O O O N a) Ln r c LO O O O O O O O Co O O O O O O O O O O N ON Ln � z 00 LO OD M O r M Ljr) OD O\ O U) O M O r M O r .-) lD OD U-) OD O r If) �o O H z M O O r N O ri r U7 Cl) N O N U) M N O N N O N M U) N O -1 r M Lf) N r1 O N N O N U U rr: r N O ri r-4 o ri 4 0 r-+ -4 o r-1 O r-4 O -4 O r-i O r N 1-4 o r-i 1-4 O -4 o .--1 a �C U z O U z H U E-H < 44 O U z H H a o O U O a H U) U) � Q H H a U) LO En C7 x 3 z z k+ r� w o a w E-4 a 1 FC W E-H z O fil A E o a z Q x U H O a U) O O U a 3 H cn a A A O O aW H O w a 0 U OHG O a 3 >>4 01 a'. W H O O U) U (7 H Q a4 r!+ a a 0 A W H W W x U) a a FC z z w A z Q w A - z 0 a a a H U) H U) al W W H w W a+ A > A > > > 3 3 3 3 A z 0 a > o O 0 O 0 N 0 N LO r o Ln 0 r-1 o r-) u) cV m O O N o O 0 >a U H ri m .-1 x O a O z O z O A O z O a O a: O cn O U) '-1 O0 3 U H RC U a A U) D rrr > Q > > H > 0 > 3 3 w 3 w 3 0 13, 3 026 z '4 ri N N M N t0 tD N N O H z N O M r1 N \ N x M U O W H o 0 0 0 0 0 < M M M M M < CO H E-+ H H H a M .• o r O 1-4 O 01 H r l0 O N O O z H . W z O m N N Oo OO >+ O w U') r-i r a o r o O Cl) O N r N 10 01 N kO (V �O RT O Lrn rn u r.>r O O ai U)O O O W H H Q < H H x Y. H � w w w w a a a a a O H O O O x x 0 a o C>~ z o 0 U U o H H w W w w U)w 1W-1 z z W > C4 C4 > z 9 Q < > o O O O aa, a w w U W N m H o a N N O w -r 'IT LO M c > I > CQ Ql m M r-1 r-4 O O H O H O r- r- N H z co O r-1 N N C] O O N O O H x a z w Q m w w a I O O w E+ a w V r� w o o r� 110 w OD E � Q1 01 M z O O O � � r H z M M M O LO Lr) U-) O r 1 r-I r1 U O O O r-1 r-1 ri M O O a I W H a z (Ta H Q O >+ 01 � x a O a o v� z H w w z O M O >+ U H Q U z z O O H H HQ QHQ O O a a a C4 O O U U x x O O a w w W x x O O r-1 —4 0 0 m a x x U z H U) x W H U) w x O LO 0 a W x r r a a LO Lr) LO Ln O O l0 \O v' cr LO Lr) M M ri r-1 O O r-i r♦ W W U U H H a a w w U) U CD 0 z z H 1-1 x x W W z z H H cD z z W W 0 cD z z n M O O > > O O O o r-1 r-1 0 0 a3 027 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 1:56PM 03/07/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 48579 03/07/02 ATT040 AT&T WIRELESS DATA SVC 49.00 48580 03/07/02 BAN300 CITY OF BANNING 20.00 48581 03/07/02 ELRO10 EL RANCHITO 274.20 48582 03/07/02 GRA010 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO 318193.08 48583 03/07/02 IMPO10 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 5627.73 48584 03/07/02 LAQ040 LA QUINTA CHAMBER COMMERC 144.00 48585 03/07/02 PET010 PETTY CASH/CITY LA QUINTA 403.99 48586 03/07/02 RIV030 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CLERK 64.00 48587 03/07/02 SOU205 SO CAL CITY CLERKS ASSOC 60.00 48588 03/07/02 VER200 VERIZON 3455.14 CHECK TOTAL 328,291.14 03 028 N M C' to lD r m M O .--1 N M c Lo �o r m m O .-a z O ri .-� .--1 .-� r•-I H .-i .� H H N N F Z N O r 0 M U 0 0 C7 C7 U' U' (D (7 0 U' (7 0 CD (D (7 0 (D 0 (7 U' U' O W H 0 rr+ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W w w m H HHH H H F H H H H F H F H F F F F H a 0 O O o ao c aD M ao 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r m r H H O O N o 0 c M O OD 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O r 0 N z H . . . . . . . . . . . . . W Z Ol O C' r-1 N ri C' O� N V' a0 Ca CD aD a0 C. O N O r 0a x c N O LO H H r•-1 r-I r1 LO M %D N M ( M O N r 'IT m p Q r (D (M N a m f'') N O O O OD M O O O N O r O cn rn W o W M r -r vv G] N r m N c H 00 u) Q a �+ A rt M c/� W � z x x x x x m 14 14 (D a z a a a a a Q< a Q H w< Q w< Q 4 x x x x x x Q U U U U U w z WE-1 >+ F+ z H Z Z E-F UUUUH UUUUUUH 0L O H O H O z 0 0 0 0 > > > > O z z z z z z 0 >4 >+ >+ >i >+ W H 3 H Z H H H " H H (n U) H O A 0 5 A O H F H H H H x A a a a a a a H a x a a z u U a U U U U a a w w w w w O H W O > 0 a 0 0 o O H H H H O cA cn cn t/) w m 0 a a a a a U > OG F A H A H A z z A D: z z z A - - - - - - A z U D z z z U z H H z H F H H z cL x rz a a a z m m m m m >+ H co a W W z w U) (n w U U U U W o 0 0 0 0 0 W E E E E H W A E> o U> a> o Z 0 Z> o W W W W > >+ >+ >+ >+ >+ }1 > U) a w w w w a a a a a w w U W N tD .4 Ho a' r \\ m m m m O> A n A A I > CU (n r-i W 0 0 0 0 z z x N �� H A H D M LO u) U; 04 rz rl: H z Ln N N A N N N > > > > x �C z a �C m W m a I o 0 w E-+ Z O O O M M O ON N N O O O O O O O N O O O O W O O 0 1n LO 0 r-1 lD M O O O O O O O N 0 0 0 0 O O O U) U7 O lD lD �D O O O O O O O 00 O O O O A rn r r rn rn r r r r r r rr r r r mU-) r r r r z O M M O O N N N N (1) (M M M M c) (M O M (M M M lD �D lD lD lD �D tD lD lD lD �D lD lD w lD vT lD lD lD W (D F z N H r 1 lfi (M M e! er C N r1 -4 r 4 . -1 H O M r-1 H 11 14 D O O O r r Ln Ln Ln u) O O LO u) (n O O O O LO N N O U Lr) 1--4 H lD lD C r c C H N r-7 N (n V' O 4 r-1 H N N U N O r-i O O O rA O r-1 O —4 O 1-4 O 1-1 O r-4 O r-1 O r1 O r 4 O ri O r1 O r-4 O H O r-4 O .� O r-4 O .-1 O In .-4 r-i C' C' r-4 r--1 e-I r-1 —4 4 1-4 r4 .--( 1-4 4 .--1 r-1 r4 1•-1 rl U U U U U U Q Q Q 4 Q Q H H H F 1x a x x w a F F F F H F w w w w w w z Z z z z z U O O H H H H A A A A 00 0 z z 0 0 0 0 OI Od 01 CY Oa Of o 0 """""" M 0 0 0 0 0 H H H H H H a a x x a x a a a a a a O Q U(-) H H H H w W W w w w In A '^ �! a a FC < < < m m m m m m >+ >+ >r >+ >4 >4 H a H s H H " 007 H" H H. H H F H EH F U) z (n U)%%% x x x x x x x U H u H U H U H" u U i w z 0 z O z O rx H rx H 0x H o4 H U U U U U U 1�"1�"1""I W H W m H Q Q a m m m m m m a z m x a a a a H H F H H F 4 Q< Q 4 a m uC H H 3 Gu U W W << a Q z z z z z z U U U U U U >+ Oi Z 0 z g F hi E+ H H C): F-1 a F-i w " PZ H a H a 1--1 m " D " D F-1 D >4 >4 >r >+ >4 >r a Q Fw H w z z 9 a w w w a a a a a a H F H F H H a z w w £ x x x a a a a a a w w w w w w U H G+ w a a a a a a a a a a a a z 0 > 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 0 O >1 C' o O M r-I o r-a 0 r-1 0 r•-1 0 r-4 0 H 0 —4 0 Q' 0 aw 0 Q' 0 sr 0 C' 0 IT 0 0 0 0 0 r1 0 0 ,J U U H H H z a r>y a m m m of of 01 0� 01 0l H H F F H F �C U FC QC1 w cz (D fx C7 H E H H H �C FC �C w w w w w w a a a a a a a a a a a a 029 z N M %r Ln lD r m m O 4 O • N N N N N N N N M M H z N O r 0 \ N x M U C7 U O W H E££ E E E x x c� < w W w w W W W w w w a s oQ H H H H H H H H H H a •• o O to 0 0 0) c Ln r m r+ H o o �n o o Ln lD 7 7 rn w z O a r v O r m a N . 4 x a l0 lD M lD lD V N -1 M M >+ O M a �� `•' m O O v m O 0 M Is4 a O t! 1 o l0 to Ln vw z O M H Q z H (7 co co co z H H H W a H rl W W W Q H W < O O �C 0 a a a o Q o x o o W H x x x H H H z Z H U E-H U? cn Cn r" x U U U O O H a (�, �, Q a O a U a > > > H H a O U U U O O a 0 u1 H H O Z U >4 >+ >+ Z U z z W W W o o z H U] E-H H H W H W W z Z Z H H W w H H H> H> U> O O O a a> Q w W W O U x x x a a U) a a a z U) a a a H H w w U W H Q a a w r y lD O M N lD N > I > (Ti l0 r 1--4 O O z Z E m v M N m H Q H Q In v v' v r-I H Z r l0 1.0 l0 r Q r uO 0 0 r H aG 4 z a a W m m a I o O w E-H Ix o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N W O O O O O O O O M m 0 0 0 O O O O O lD lD r 0) (Y) Lrn r Ln Ln Ln r-i .-a z M O O O m M M (T) M M l0 l0 r to l0 t0 l0 to lD l0 E+ z rM •a N O 'A M M M c v' Q Ln 01 O N O to u-) Ln Ln Ln O a l0 N r U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H E-+ H U z z z O H H F-i .4 Uj oaaa w a o a a U 0 >+ a In >+ >+ >+ H W a H H H z a Q H H H Q U U U U O I \ U >+ W H V) U) U) W H a z RC aC < Q U U U U 0 0 0 0 0 U) a >+ OI >+ >+ >+ a Q N N N N N < a E-F E-H E-H W U H H 1--1 H H a O H H H > a a a a a a Q WWW H o w w w w w w z a a a a M > > > > > H w W z 0 > 0 0 0 0. Ln o 0 0 0 0 O . 4 r-1 -1 (M O O O O O O O >+ O O O O N N N N N N U H H H H > O a a a a a U H W W W H O W W W W W > > > > c 01 N C N M a Q H O E4 H z W Q a I Q H a W CU I O E-F 03 030 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 2:32PM 02/28/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 48536 02/28/02 AAA001 AAA TRAVEL AGENCY 1814.50 48537 02/28/02 AAA050 AAA FLAG & BANNER 950.00 48538 02/28/02 ABE001 JACQUES ABELS 150.00 48539 02/28/02 BIA013 BIA - DESERT CHAPTER 58.00 48540 02/28/02 BUT010 RICHARD BUTLER 150.00 48541 02/28/02 CAL040 CALIFORNIA VISION SERVICE 1037.05 48542 02/28/02 CAN050 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO 526.83 48543 02/28/02 COA030 COACHELLA VALLEY INSURANC 26565.00 48544 02/28/02 COA080 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 49.16 48545 02/28/02 COM005 COMMUNITY PRAYER BREAKFAS 36.00 48546 02/28/02 CUN100 DENNIS CUNNINGHAM 50.00 48547 02/28/02 DIA100 DENNIE DIAMOND 50.00 48548 02/28/02 FIL100 GIA FILICE 50.00 48549 02/28/02 GRA010 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO 352520.67 48550 02/28/02 HAR100 JOHN HARDCASTLE 600.00 48551 02/28/02 IMPO10 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 14502.19 48552 02/28/02 IMP011 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 200.00 48553 02/28/02 KIR010 TOM KIRK 75.00 48554 02/28/02 LAQ050 LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES 747.91 48555 02/28/02 LAQ065 LA QUINTA HISTORICAL SOC 200.00 48556 02/28/02 LEA020 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES 425.00 48557 02/28/02 LEW010 TOM LEWIS 50.00 48558 02/28/02 LOU100 ELSE LOUDON 50.00 48559 02/28/02 MAH100 CYRILLE P MAHFOUD 50.00 48560 02/28/02 MER200 MERRITT HOUSE INN 283.80 48561 02/28/02 MIT150 MICHAEL MITCHELL 50.00 48562 02/28/02 MOU100 DONALD J MOULIN 50.00 48563 02/28/02 OLA100 MILTON OLANDER 50.00 48564 02/28/02 OSBO50 LEE M OSBORNE CPA 50.00 48565 02/28/02 PAL050 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS 45.00 48566 02/28/02 PUE050 MARIA L PUENTE 50.00 48567 02/28/02 REY050 ELAINE REYNOLDS 50.00 48568 02/28/02 RIV040 RIVERSIDE CNTY DEPT CHILD 426.50 48569 02/28/02 ROB150 STEVE ROBBINS 150.00 48570 02/28/02 SHA040 ROSITA SHAMIS 50.00 48571 02/28/02 SHA050 ARCHIE SHARP 50.00 48572 02/28/02 TH0200 DAVID THOMS 50.00 48573 02/28/02 TYL050 ROBERT T TYLER 150.00 48574 02/28/02 UNIO05 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 164.00 48575 02/28/02 UNIO06 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 950.00 48576 02/28/02 UNU050 UNUM LIFE INS 1991.56 48577 02/28/02 VIC100 VICTOR VALLEY COLLEGE 105.00 48578 02/28/02 WRI050 ROBERT S WRIGHT 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 405,673.17 03 031 z 9 a O U q' l0 'ITV l0 N N .-+ OD Ol v M N E+ z O 11 00 N N O W C7 U Ey FC C7 £ W C7 £ W C7 £ W £ w £ W £ W £ W £ W £ W £ W £ W £ W a ko a a0 E+ E+ E-F E-4E4 E+ E-4 E• E+ E+ E- P N •• E+ z w £ P z =) O U) _q O O U) O O U) O O 0 U7 O O o U) U) O r M M OD N O O l0 l0 rn c' O O . (n O O o O O 0 U) >+ Q a O m � rn ,� H 0 H Lr) Ui �O N O U) O O O O O O O O U) O M m O O l0 1 O O O O E-+ U) z H v r1 m O U) rn O U) �-+ CD U) O U) -4 r M 0 10 N LO U) k0 Ln l0 q' Cu x M Cn W O O U) U z E• Cl)z w z z '-' N z 04 w a < £ £ £ z Q w a E-4 a Z s E--� � .4 E-+ z E, a E a zr�� a W z a o a a >4r� a o Q a w o �+ U O E z Q 0 E O U O E-4 w W EQ-+ o E-+ O U Ea-+ o E-+ a' M p o E+ E-4 o P to � W E<-4 o E Ea-4 O E CL' a C4-H 0 E a Ca-� o p E-4 a Q U H 0" E� a U O Cp E- O z o £ �4 0 z o z H a O O to z a o 2G no fx U > cn a o >4 P �-+ a o P U W a O a > z H Pz U U) . a w > C] z W H U) O 0 z W H z z C] z W RC fl' w 0 z W H z z M z W z o H 0 z W H W o z W a x EF 0 z W a W w z W z => £ 0 z W E-+ H x O z W M E+ > a > w > a > ~ > H > > > £O > a > � U) w w a C7 a > a W 3 U Q U " O o a w 0 O 0 0 �a cr OOo a 0 0 0 O z H I Q H z H £ :D z N m W N CC1 E4 O H M 110 U) M l0 O l0 O N CA W N W W O m Lf) w 44 FC a z < ao w ao x o O E-4 w z W O O O N M U) O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O U) O r O O O O O O O O O O O O D z PU) r M l0 u) O l0 m O r m w m O U) U-) M N r M N u-) N ko M w M l0 O U) O U) z 0 O U 0 q' 0 r -4 0 q -1 o .-I -4 O Q o o O o 0 0 -;r 0 -4 r u) M ,-+ 0 1-4 0 r-i u) U Q -4 O 1-4 O r-1 O .-� O -1 .1 O r-1 e--i O r-1 H O r-1 '-i O r-1 1--1 O r-1 -4 O rl O rl O '-i W H O U z to w w >a cwn z z a < x a M o w v w w z a z O 9 D FA >i 3 >4 CA a a a a u E1 a a U)U) > a a Q >4 d 0 H o O w a H z w > c� W ro a W w H a oo Q H z W w H .a > > Q .4 a >+ E-4U z H C] 00 <� >a H a �a E a C.a w 0 a Q o w o w x x z 0 U) H w �q w H o W u h ra u fZ a U z U < O < O z O z WC] z O z M OU [z, O > O U) O M .- i O O .1 O W O U) O M O m U) O O O O O E H u f0 Q w O E-4 aao O a u O z O 0 O 0 O £ O -4U z � 032 z M O r-4 N M Q' U7 Vo r m m O LO aD .-4 ri N M --� --� --� .-� .-� --� ri H r♦ .-� N N v' N N O H z N O O N \ N N x U U C7 C7 0 U 0 U' 0 0 0 0 U OW E-H £ E E E E E x E E E E x E ON E E C� rC W W W W W w w w w W W W W W m W W Q al H H H H H H H H H H H H E+ H E-4 H H a a kD N •• O r 1-4 0) O CO M lD 0) N r v' O O O O E-H O �r O r-1 O M U-) ri U') lD r-1 r O O m Co O z H W z o rn o o r rn r� r o E M Lr) (n O r-I O m rn v o N r r o r v o N �+ O N m (M lD r-4 O uo U7 LO v N r N a M M LO a N r V' N 0 o r o rn 0 0 0 O o ko 0 o o rn o o a o U) cn 0 0 o ci o �i M o H L Q Ln m N 0 0 o r O cr O u) O z z LO ko U) N r N H CU O O H N v (7 U) U) > Ln r4 W Q W >-4 a s M w a a w w W w w O [_., Gu U) Z H rJ+ 11+ < z H U U) H w W x o z a > a h h a a w a a H ,a a o+ a a H z E+ Q H z z z H z H U U U U U U U H U H E H .a H H U) O o O O O o 0 Q O > > > > > > > o w 0 O o O O a W H E-+ H F+ H H H > H Ul U) U) U) U) U) w H z E+ U E+ E-F H W iUi a a w a U U U a < a U U U U U U U a o a U a � a a z O O x O O O O O O .... H H H O U O z 0 (n O O Q > a O PO a a a O .40 a a a a a a (z O O "0 -4 O O a z U z co z HHHZ w Z H E-H H H H H H Z a z Z z o z z a H cn w w w m m m w > W U U U V U U u w w w z w w < w w > >> z z z> > w w w w w w w> H> <> a> a> U O z o 0 0 a a a a a a a W a \ a U U) H U U U H w w w w w w w a a 0 a W E" H O a O rM O O W o a p p p O p L I O > i > OC1 N O O O O O O v `.G N z z x H H H H H H H O H M W a a a a a a o a 00 H z W < < < < < 4 0 co w O w > > > > > > Ln U [24 x < z a rC w W m a O O w H a O M O m O O Q) N ('M v lD O M O O O O W O Lr) Cl LO O O 'A M lD lD lD O In O O O O W O U7 U) Lr) O O lD lD lD lD lD O U7 O O O O m m O 01 M r r r r r r r a) Ol z O O 1-1 O M N N N (V N N N O O N M M U) lD lD lD ri lD lD lD lD lD lD lD lD tf) H z 1-4 OD 00 M O M 0 H r-4 M Ln O O r O U7 Lr) in U7 Ln Ln U) Ln O O O O O r-4 lD lD lD O v v v v' v C M lD C O r 1 v U U r-I r-1 r-A r-I ri ri r-I ri r-I r-1 r-1 r-I ri Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r-I v v' v' rl -4 r-4 r-I r 4 r-1 .-1 r-4 v' 1-1 -A -4 -4 O O O U) U) U) U) U) U) U) Cl) W O U U U H H H H H H H H W U) U) O O O O O O O O >4 W o 0 0 z z z z z z z z a4 H M O O O O O O O O a U ►-+ 0 H E-H H H H H . H . H H U O U U U H HP H H H H H W a Ln M M M w << Q1:4< Q a < O EL4 a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U >+ H H �i H H H H H H H H H H . H [-+ U) ►a (n U) U) U) OG O4 a a 04 a a a H H i z z z Q a a a a a D: a a U x u W O O O OU H H H H H H H H a z H a a a a a a a a a d4 H H O CO H r7 W W W < << Q<<< Q < a z z < n H H H x H . H H . H H H FA H H14 >-4 a W H H H a a a a a a a a J4 M M a a z z z z w w w w w w w w a a M a a o O 9 � 90 � � E � � � � x 0 (: z H U U U U h H H H H H H H H H a .a a H Gu W z o > O 0 0 o 0 0 O Ln o M O '>, O ri 1-1 O r-i O r1 O O r-4 r O .-+ O r i O r 1 O r♦ O ri O r i O ri O r-i O al O %D O N O U U H H a 9 9 9 a a a a a a a a a a d O+ r� 0 FC U H Lt+ 0 0 0 Q x E2: H H E H x H x H x H x H 2: H H d4 Q a a a a 033 N 0 a H O z O M Ln (M N MN M OD MN 0) OD N - MN m re) l0 M N OD N \ M cV O W 0 a a x U H < m u £ w H 0 £ w H u £ W H U £ W H C7 £ w H 0 £ C4 H U £ W H C7 £ W H C7 £ w H CD £ w H 0 £ w H ON 0) m H to H z w £ >+ &4 z m O O O O Lr) o O o Lr) o O o Ln O OD M OD N Cl o O Ln O O O Ln O O . o uO Cl O O Ln O O V• O O O Ln O O O Ln O uo �O N V a 0 O O Cl 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 u� N V x < O m 0 o Ln C7 z E+ 0 o Ln x < O m o o to cn z H OD 1� 0 CN z O H o o Ln x < O m 0 o Ln x < O m 0 o Ln x < O m 0 o Un 0 Ln c z O H 0 o uO C9 z H'! 0 0 to 0 > H x 0 cn £ £ 0 a 0 Cl) a w z z Q > x w >1 a 0 cn >4 a 0 Un >4 x 0 cn < > x w ^ £ £ 0 a x F-+ z 0 a H 0 F--1 > o < a H O U U)Q H x a H o H > 0 < a Q H 0 Q', a a U s Q H O (n w x a a Q H 0 F-i > 00 r� a H 0 H > Q a H O H > 0< r� a E+ 0 z O W x a a H 0 Cn w x< a .a H 0 U cn H x a H 0 z a Q C7 1 W U H O H H a H x H x 0 O H z w £ H H x O 0 Q a H x O 0 E--H z w £ H H x O 0 U a \ U H x O 0 a z H U cn w z G] > cn W > z w > ::)z H a W > cn W > z W > z H CD 0 z w > x O H cn z W > H cn G] > z W > H (n W > 0 z G] > H U) W > 0 z W > O Lu £ O z W > x O H Un 0 z w > x ::)z H a 0 W > H 0 x W Gu U W 0 z H N U N z H N 0 a H x N z H N z H N z H N U U H x N O U N \ a H 0 0 > 1 z > z x w m £ O o N o 0 N o 0 N O 0 N O 0 N O 0 N o o N O O N O o N H O H 0 x H O z m w w m w w m w w m w w m w w m w w m w w m w w m w w Q z a rtir m W m x I 0 0 w H x w 0 o O 0 0 o 0 Cl O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 O 0 0 o 0 0 O 0 O o 0 o O 0 0 o O z H m O Ln rn O Ln 0) O a) r M lD m o u) rn O un 0) O u) rn O Lrn r M l0 rn O in o, O Ln N N z O O 1-4 to .-+ Ln N � Ln r 1 H O C 1--1 O V -4 in -4 .-i to -4 Ln .-, ul ,-1 O a 4 Ln N O O O O O o o O O O O O O O O 0 a M o U) O z H a a W z H x a U C� z a a cn W U) 0 H x U H a o >4 W z U)Q z0 £ °' O x H 0 z a O m Q a E4 a z w U w m H o f a x 30 a a w w a H H H x a w x �' 0 Q O z ° o w O >i a x w o U) w a FC U)a H c=4 0 z w £ Ho Un w x x U z o a w a H u x r>r w > 1-4 a z 0 O U H U H U > o -1 o 3 w a 0 O o 0 a 0 o ' I x 0 0 N x w £ 0 u) .-i H H £ 0 0 .-i o O £ 0 0 . 1 Q a 0 0 Ln O m M O 0 Ln O a < a 0 Ln O w a o Lo O >+ W x O .9r O > j S �1 H l J ,} x 034 z r r 1-1 M V' M tD M r O Q M c v v N N c' a 0 E+ z N O O N N U C7 0 (D 0 C7 O W H x E £ E E x E C7 W W w W W m w W W W E rlr CQ H H H H H H H H H H a a tD N •• O O O O O O O tD O O r '+ H O O O O O O O Ln 0 O i z H w z O O O O O V' O O M 2) Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln in rn o J) r a O a LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to o o v irn o 0 0 0 o O o Ln o 0 to 0 0 o H o o 4 o .� 1; o a N to C7 Ln Z Ln U) in in lD Ln Ol O Z Ln FC z 0 W rn 1-1 O H H U) H O � E- H a z a z n a w z x v vi En E F z z Q a a a w a 0 a a H a z a rC a N a w .a >4 < x < U) FC Qx < z < £ Q z < H 1 < LL < < Cr < < z H X H H H a H < H E H D E-H O H O H 0 E-i a H a O 0 O o zO 0 a 0 0 0 I O 0 0 z 0 0 H U H < H H H U E-H H H 2 H H H U H Q F W Q H a a a s U Cr U rz U z� a H a a a U a 0 1-q 0 z o < O H o w 0 z o w o H o MO 00 " o > a 0 H 0 a 0 a 0 H 0 H 0 0 < Ca H 0 U 0 tz 0 z U z z z a z O z H Z z z O z 3 z a z z o z H Cf) W Z W H W E-H W x W z W W W w W w H W w > < > a > cn > U > Q > rz > a > 0 > z > U) > I 0 a o H a a H H H H U) a U x < a a > to [L x 0 W 44 U w N N N N N I N Q H 0 z O O O O O O O a O W O O O O O c 0 > I > co N N N N N t0 N C4 z z z rn CQ H M H D W m m CQ co OD CQ I �+ z W w W W W M W O 0 C14 Lu 124 Gu 44 O Gu H H `,L FC z a < Ao w CQ a 1 0 0 w H a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O pq o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o rn rn rn rn rn u-) r rn r rn z O O O O O N M M lM o in in in in in N l0 N tD Uf1 E-F z 1-4 .-4 o + 0 Ln tD 0 Ln o 0 0 0 0 0 Ln o 0 c N c c c O i O r1 c U rti o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H a a w w cn U) w 0 0 w M a o w w a o x x 0 a H U zH < M U) W 1-4 CL U)>+ U z H a a 0 0 z w H H Q w Q x H >+ >+ a W H CQ x x 0 Q < w r., a z O cn v) x H S 3 w > cn CQ H a H H � H a 01 w H 0 a w w o a < a > H x H W H H E H w a< o W cn U > CQ H o U m a 0 H o a o z z z H 0 cn z cn a rt ca rz o > a H w w z 0 > o 0 0 0 0 Ln tD O 0 0 a LO CT U-) o u-) o o al o an O >+ r-1 O O N O O 0 O .•-i O U H CQ Q < 0 a H F-i D U i--i U H 0 x x x >+ z z z H p; 3 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 19, 2002 Transmittal of Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: C STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Transmittal of Treasurer's Report dated January 31, 2002 for the City of La Quinta. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with California Government Code Section 53645 as amended 1 /1 /86; and is in conformity with City Code 3.08.010 to 3.08.070 Investment of Money and Funds. I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet next month's estimated expenditures. espe ully submitted, n M. Falconer, Finance Director Approved for Submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Treasurer's Report, City of La Quinta 043 4 MEMORANDUM TO: La Quinta City Council FROM: John M. Falconer, Finance Director/Treasurer SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report for January 31, 2002 DATE: March 8, 2002 Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month ending January 31, 2002. The report is submitted to the City Council each month after a reconciliation of accounts is accomplished by the Finance Dept. The following table summarizes the changes in investment types for the month: Investment Cash Beginning $833,334 Purchased 606897 $11,, Notes (1) Sold/Matured Other EndingChange $12,440,231 16,462,411 $11,606,897 168,890 LAIF US Treasuries (2) $16,293,521 $56,201,552 168,890 8,965,373 9,000,000 ( ) 111,165) ( 4,162 56,055,760 13,002,628 (145,792) 4,162 US Gov't Agencies (2) Commercial Paper (2) $12,998,466 $4,998,110 4,992,465 5 000 000 ('71,388) 7,268 4,997,843 9,144,655 (267) 71,388 Mutual Funds $9,2161043 541 026 $25 733 625 1 $14 071 388 $99 735 $112 103 528 $11 562 502 Total $100 I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code; and is in conformity with the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the pools expenditure requirements for the next six months. the City of La Quinta used the Bureau of the Public Debt, U.S. Bank Monthly Statement and the Bank of New York Monthly Custodian Report to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. The City of La Quinta received notice in January that it was the owner of 18,339 shares of common stock in the Principal Financial Group. The shares were obtained from the demutualization of Principal Financial Group, the City's health care provider, from a privately owned company publicly vestmea ed and whp h has not ny. The City is in the is in the process of selling the stock, which is not a permissible )ove. The common stock is being managed by Mellon Investor Services, 466,177 as of January 31, 2002. ate Footnote (1) The amount reported represents the net increase (decrease) of deposits and withdrawals from the previous month. (2) The amount reported in the other column repr esents the amortization of premium/discount for the „' month on US Treasury, Commercial Paper and Agency investments. 063 E E Ey 0 N r N > C_ O N c N •yam .- m y y N N a) N C 0 M D 3 E M m ai D E 7 M U E (D N U M E N o 0 0 0 d 0 O a� 0 0 Z z Z Z Z ;Z z Z i i I Q N N M ^ M IL+ O N N N 4 8 d C7 c c d i`c ' ° HU U LL LLcc � m m > �c N N N T O M E N T M M M y v M > a M N N N N $ N j................... $ y M •Q •Q M (- a) V 'o N C ° t/J C N C H C C C C C .Q .Q G .Q O ��_�___ Q V M a.! �yy j? ia�l N O_ Q o S E E E E E ` LO ° va> ° o $o y ��egw S—�- n� $ rn of �� c $ �o 1c �j $ N M v v �E Q m c o 0 0 e i OD OD a� S LO rn z co z (Q a0 o f0 uiLO N > O 7 \° o oQ pO $ Op O o O88 o o I o opp Q S p\° S O pp 0 p ( N a0 O O s} fV 0 0 � co O O e NE I 3 E ._`QQc4c _ --- S E E E _ Q Z X co $ E E M N 1 Nco N � fH fA b9 to fR U. a> o......... O M ll� O O a? O O Z SOSSS O O O O C i N M L? i �? Z o Q S 8 o e o 0 o o o �- , coOLL S o V O O$ op O O C C C C C N E o LLR Ln o $ $EEEEE N co M co 0 0 �pMMMtn 603, wg� ul C V C ° a) N O NO NCO (D E 6 g CO - cU �Q= � U) �•c w d � d c LL v lA o c > — V N M 7 M $ C� �c --° c �� O.Q ° aN m a � '0 U M m`$ c QgNaNm�UUM0:,o v > ° m ti(i c�oE c cME4)<Zm '° Z.Lt' Z N E � Y Q Y Of LL N .0 CM �°, ° 3 w v gM �ccoo ym"m2 .. aci 2 c.c_ N yM0C cYvc M E �yoM (D c a1 f4 N w - c)a;cQ �M co ° Em (D E o m $ C c Q E �Op E E d >, m 0 M Q > c ° y ` C V EZ=J LL= E U C MV N C E ° V 62 t' H- °nUda0ON0 . U ° (D N 0 O 9 Q M >1M C L C vx p> a) M O U U) CD x +J C9 LL LL (A LL LL 0 O > p 0000 hO1-m M co 0) co f4 ,-: - y« aa) E > > C C N r�aci arnE UQ >M M au.a� 000m �Np� N Np� C C C N "1 �� N ! W W W CO W 7 7 a Q Q Q (n ��lLi Fl 5 a (D 0 0 Q ? Ntttc��ii73.^-» t la a IM 33 oo 101D s 33� 0 mm aaa 8� sQQQ CC6 = 0 7 O r n y O 4 7 � l�Nyj O"f0 Q> m N 69 Cp C, tgC d 0: N Y a N C �'U • LL'ma yU�_ E LL f0 U � •4�O � NLL zgg� g2V O F O LL d N T .5 O 0) LL > C � O V DD N N 128y000ooOo15U ��SggSS�Sm� y y� N N N a Y eC0 133:X Fgg' 010f ^ C4 O 0�--- ---- --- cc �p > U) 0cc N N� h R N N W M Q �l7 d� 35 J C ��QQaQaQQaQQQ a— N col t0 ^NN W y OOf O07�NgY vv 7 f+M r) Iq IL Y A=•c•c•ccC g U. �Cp �Cp Cp �Cp �Cp �Cp �Cp CCp �Cp �Cp R f0 U U U U U U U U cccccC 0 N 0 0 C) 0 0 N N N > m= E E E E E E E E E E E E aaaaaaaQaaa ,rrrrrrrrrrr cn N V NVI LL d co to dfna U) aggUggUgUgUg � _ d 0 0 0 O Y LL Y O Y Y Y c— Am��mmmm`mm�mm �a V)mmU mtn mNm(/j� oldy, jN(NO mfn Ofn7N7 a 0Q O 000 a a o o�UU��p(W�7��0W�pJ��B�gto o a UU^ S .+1 04 j v`vJ O t 0 c U c t6 CD c c LL Ca > >, Q CD =a a� E cu (D E N c c O O 3v- ON C1 0 > Ce-) cu oEc° Cca 0 cn U -) O O O O O O O O O O ��00000 MZZZOOOOO Ooo00 e- N CV L6 1- ��QQQMMMCA� OzzzCn�CDCDN �ZZZtititiCDti N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O �O.000NNNNN �ZZZ1`f�f�� OO `O OO N M O O O O O LO CO O A N N a00a 00MetM M •�0N0"t � �-,i c M C 4 U CO a •>--ago caooc=cZ'Z" cn0O��o�� m a o- cO 0 CUU M Y Vi E U c cn N co (n cn t cW�» U Ecco o O (A t H U you d Z C c fl. fl. O. N O L L U ca ��aaamm OVa L c ++ to to fa O O Z c d >O Lj� Lk k- Z Z O d H U'' E E E z cCE � � Q m O— o o o 0 0> li > E cU�UUU O c y d 00 " 0 0 (V�-F-U' d E 00UU E E Evjcnu) 2- CD O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m CL 00000 00000 00000 Nr-NLV 3 o \ \ o 0 ti O 0 C) N } C0000LO r N N (D N N N N N O O O Cl Cl O O O O O N N N N N G Op OO CD N M Cl O O O Cl O O O O O O pp Go co 00000 co � C5 O C; CT CT o a o 000o i N � cli ui U U .� 0 aL c U) a' 0 Li c 'm >% � co CU Moot'=aZ'Z' Ocnoo CL CoM(1)0))U) a a MM v�45 U) E U c�uj M U) CU c0 W H U E" O c rn cn (� � C C6 U o V O CA O N N- L L to Amp O c c CL a a = mv v t O ca M co M co U N U 0) a�ic°n)c°n' a) H o o o 4- -W Z c 2 E•EZZ 0 a) V% cuZ ZOONZ,?,EEwE ' I E E E>> c E C NrQ >>>0O—COOOOOo c cUUUU 02 m o — F- Ta mEoWWEEE(nc�c�cn�r �zoggCLCLCL co co NtoCO N OM M �tM�tiO LOMr-o7 0 do LO I m � ssa ti C 7 C CD t6 U ,O 0 fa `- — O E N 7 .m d m o a (n U c tM c=� .2 eCo `'m a s VWE c a ts E•v c N C r N CD N r- Eoc��W o �,g-- or c >C '? c O cd-la-J:)2 U O U C m m m to C •� O O E E y y ; O C c 06 c t m m N V C U O '~ O N O c 0 O M w r a O c O y c a v o `ac 'tOLO CO C0^j ND 0O�O O N O N tMN cocCCCNOUjOc00OOm I-m Cc M N O-� Ocm Ot! �O� C14 ��NqtNNCw)O �ti H7M qtco NV 0NNO N1f1 0co6R 6A Ni yr m Q 0 N O tCOCNC� U N h CO • O O N tN CO M a. ' NNc0� m 0)� Q O f� 0 NrnCOt° a 1*ON� N � C � m C LL C Ll C LL LL O O (M y >c C LL E w.cEornv �� 3u c0=:3 N Q -- O ac)vc c O LL O LL y 3 L m �- U. 0 c 0 'J •+ E m O j LL m O rt+ O ll O U O c`n 0 U o O c O v c F- 06 c U U M y j 0 O c O E O O P C O y Q •a O "��' w x �.�a�u-ao� aci ° cm Q ''4 O Z� C Li Z O m ( is0 E m 006.2 •a N O 7 p y d > Oil ml4,�w •a 7 LL � Ucnr y'.4 7 _ c E N N y c j O m w— a"- m o o Q2 m 7 y O 3 Co O 0 y C p S L O U) O c�C9C�Cic>cncUQQwc �F-I a Uo-J LL. aO mqtwowm v LO O OCO�OOm(h4 7 69 O j C,4 C) — LO qt M 00 0- 0) Go N qt M ERO N — —69 co O�-CNOMNM LO I,- . . Co O O O LO t- N� L 6gON-OOP N CO co co N�c0OLoO� — _CO�IgLgoID CL C O �N0O0Md.O Q 69 Qcoco�ONi4(� ,- c0 N O O 6ON—M�E+9 0 .- �OMM L LOtOtONLo,0) U U sd_ In N c0 cj � I,- OD 0O0 iO00 CO 1� 0) 0 0 � 06 4 C4 to O t0 m mOc 0��00 _ M a O L O6 O 06 N M LL LL �O M It 7 co E9 ��OOMtON `" 00 Nsi�cNO0tOt0 �tONOrl-cq �d O tnO.6f�O cd�Co OOOq*.- c�dOCO�a�Oc�Or m C4 6 46 M O A N m P,. C O S � —Lo q � M�mm gtml-- 69 696903,64 69 69 co69 o?�O qt(NcoNmMtNO.0NI--cOco E MM 0 ) co E —? MLO N0)0L UN0 0 M — 0UMN0N6 pO0 0 N WWWWN4do 0"M CNN Lo-64 E9E 6H O 0 �OtnMNOO- qNOc0DOO a)M cd -00 OLONMON N0)�NOOLO 0 tLO q*I"-tij ONtDM 0 00�o'q0)NCj Cj z69c-• a ��0�� Zd9L0 cj O 6:i 60 E9 69 69 M—c0O q*M 0— to �LNNtt! cM� ycNpr-U)00fMOqt O M m M— 0 w0 co � O O O N n M um co 0) 0) UNO��Or.- O ONtO O0 00L ��N �ulNtO— `'O 613,LoM�r-�co 60, 69 E9 EJ9 CO69 0 O r" I N M N N co co O M qt E Cfhh— CD MM CN -Op>E-ct C? LQC-lO4 NNE9O0MM 1- " Oqt0)0O0 Nw(0 ON0 N CO Nne- — MMLo 6f3 64 69 64 69 6e 0 _ y0cMNCOD OM c—Loco CNV cocoLO�� O M N O CO 0 N M ,t O �N�Ce) CO It CM tOOLOM04 O- CO < 000) NCi QN�a Ct 0t0N� 64—U) 04 6�9�M_NCO� E9 0 Cf) cn LO B co —.- c0 co 0(Dco OtiNcoN� 0-N(hto"T46 N M 0CO 0 0 0 7 N� M^ 0) N M �cNpOIa?N �coCt MC) �.N-Nr000~ 6AI- M�M�cOG 69 EA O O m O U m z_ O a_ w z_ O a_ O y N O O y co C c U E m 02 E m U 0 cEya 4) 3cE c o m> o > o LL �tSaF�U'O ca °tSa�� m J t-chin»a`�f°- �vin»a`2i \. v ,V • N n o � a a Q Q Val I V Z O O O Z O O O O O Z N N O rl O Z N N N O Z H O O fA V Y V H OO a O V Z O OO OO NyO O ZyyyO gypjOO act O N �� t71 O 41 0 � a t9 M V) N C N tO N p + $; cC%LN Ci aO�Vf'>� HHH� NNH fOe- It N Qp Q O Q O O Q O O �Oy f0 vao ANC O1 ap app aap �ayp �p$pp �pp� a f0 Ocn f� V rOOO�V r O)01010)O rOyY�yT,f�Ig r�� rNryC4 64 N aD .- V Cl H�� NNYf 0010 N x � e 8 N V aC O Pf O 7 0 0 ............ 0 O Q O Q O O Z O O Z N N N H H N N M N H H O LA p� N y r r1(N1a''))�t7 M M N a M 44 07 O < p < o 0 N N P Cn O N Vl p �Nn O p� � f��fpppp fp V N �} Tcl�N�tnO N a9 O N O N N pp�� pppp �p pO ey� n0 YqNNOf �t0� NNaDn p i ap N� QO O�C7 LL7<ID Of�M♦p N LnNaA -aD N N N M N � Z Cpy {J CS C C �u Cp C �ry C,7 C t ," EEEEEEEEE E � ��aaaaaaaaa a C 0--————— — iblYV raa�mma�iTiayia�ia�imawiai r rrrrrrrrrr m ti a 9 .N . v? l! . LL V?) V &ff3ZZGZQZU� mF gm�mmimim�m` .e a ui QNmmy mmmuimvi- M�N j V NNtn�W�tn7473�Oa=0=O�ap� t7 F N H UUCJ e0- N N to 11� m co N 00 C) �t C*4 CO go 0 n N r W ac N � M O c' a 0) M OI O p ~ L6 rn � O � a � v G0 Lq r M LO Ch 0 IOA MMMOOON - - - Mr ... N V mNCSL Cf LOON nONOM ON(OOCOOLo001 MMOGO (pr CAO OD to O 0 C�Q0v v N �rO0)aD Ld ; V) - QP, LL N CM coV V0 rrrN r' r: N of cOpp �NQ v CO t- ODOO V ( to ON(0 L�� ti O O N O �Ole a O'Q `�'f91- c�OMrtff ch to i (ON (D Cf)a OMO�t Ck N La0 LL (DV LO(OQO MrNNM0 � N r d N � U) �+ 00 (`') gyp 00 N OQ N Cn LO U') eq M m�NDC`)()CO r M I� r In N 1-IA--: V N �Nn Ln LLp Lq 000OOON �eN(jM N d'M V et Nq.O! in M n M ►� ta(� �04 U)0� Oc)�O CO+) tf)0M0 rMM�) - CO �aD O K CO If 0 1 _ Cap dNrOIO .iLI; Md�0 C0 0 Cp 04 Cq NCLLO N d LnO O yN� O OO(Mf)� �M0M1I C'7(00 V IOA�C00 �M C,4 Lo 0 0 A �000 C1Nle CTC000 CO04 n0a0000a 0 n � p M LL 0 C, OO to p N 04 r M r 0 1� pq �rrr Nu 0 t0 CO CO O co m ++ N N N M O O O (") P a) CD MO)N N O CO (n Cn N ') r a O M I* q CY O O NO a -rr% r 00 M N ONO_ 00 O? M 00 �MMOQiN M co O O M � N Cy, 0) (^O� Cf)cli N O � (^O Q LL M� r r r et OO vi O C'9 C� 7rW �(DN00O a)ONOOiff 1pNrCO O04 U) co OGO h C O N CO M vp� N0f01�^ Oc)vC)v ; Or Q 04N (ON4V) D'co M N N �A torr0^ NCO�COOM M ... M C L E y o > L ~ y c � f6 7 (a � H � v Ex c m w w d H m �i m C c m Q^1 C> m C J x C ILI! L x Fes- d Q •1 3 ai �c U W C) m C y G1 LL E C O V C y ¢ C w d Im C c > O. N pCL m O X 0- Z C d N e0 V A (Xo c yF-d� v��d (DW_ x m 0) L C afv z W UU >WU H z U zV.. w mO a i N O O N 6 CO 7 C m 7 C O (D V C C a m E E a w rn x £ T O CL Q a O o a LL m UT cLi M (b Z c y C � CO L U c c O w Ui CITY OF LA QUINTA BALANCE SHEET 01/31/02 CITY CITY FIXED LONG TERM RDA FIXED RDA FA LONG TERM FINANCING LONG TERM GRAND CITY ASSETS DEBT RDA ASSETS DEBT AUTHORITY DEBT TOTAL ASSETS: POOLED CASH 12,380,644.67 15,648,769.78 97,861.72 28,127,276.17 LQRP INVESTMENT IN POOLED CASH 735,000.00 735,000.00 INVESTMENT T-BILUNOTES & OTHER 37,980,000.00 37,980,000.00 AUTO MALL CASH LQRP CASH 11,339.95 11,339.95 BOND REDEMPTION CASH 210,197.46 1,929.06 212,126.52 BOND RESERVE CASH BOND PROJECT CASH 44,417,841.24 550,247.67 44,968,088.91 BOND ESCROW CASH 1,000.00 PETTY CASH CASH & INVESTMENT TOTAL 1,000.00 50,361,644.67 61,023,148.43 650,038.45 112,034,831.55 INVESTMENT IN LAND HELD FOR RESALE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 39,038.84 60,900.00 99,938.84 68,696.09 PREMIUM/DISCOUNTONINVESTMENT (52,053.91) 120,750.00 44,783.30 LQRP-ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 44,783.30 593,732.73 INTEREST RECEIVABLE 28,125.00 565,607.73 13,489,553.69 LOAN/NOTES RECEIVABLE 13,489,553.69 DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES 2,299,096.69 DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES - CVAG 2,299,096.69 (2,299,0969) CVAG ALLOWANCE (Z,299,096.69) 0. DUE FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTS 0.37 .37 551,038.04 DUE FROM OTHER FUNDS 551,038.04 8,497,550.20 DUE FROM RDA 8,497,550.20 1550,022.63 INTEREST ADVANCE -DUE FROM RDA 3,550,022.63 2,504,746.22 ADVANCES TO OTHER FUNDS 56,483.22 2,448,263.00 3,182.01 NSF CHECKS RECEIVABLE 3,182.01 833.40 ACCRUED REVENUE 833.40 20,711,742.00 FIXED ASSETS 20,711,742.00 711,534.48 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION 711,534.48 2,294.00 TRAVEL ADVANCES 2,294.00 EMPLOYEE ADVANCES PREPAID EXPENSES RECEIVABLE TOTAL 12,836,176.84 20,711,742.00 17,281,729.16 50,829,648.00 WORKER COMPENSATION DEPOSIT RENT DEPOSITS UTILITY DEPOSITS 75.00 00.00 .00 MISC. DEPOSITS 2,100.00 2,1 DEPOSITS TOTAL 2,175.00 2,175.00 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS 9,988,279.05 9,988,279.05 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION 03 AMOUNT AVAILABLE TO RETIRE L/T DEBT 0,866,860.97 9,568, 08.62 AMOUNT TO BE PROVIDED FOR L/T DEBT 951,847.65 80,866,860.97 7,750,000.00 82,952,104.70 TOTAL OTHER ASSETS 951,847.65 9,988,279.05 84,261,978.00 7,750,000.00 102,952,104.70 TOTAL ASSETS 63,199,996.51 20,711,742.00 951,847.65 78,304,877.59 9,988,279.05 84,261,978.00 650,038 45 7,750,000.00 265,818.759.25 LIABILITIES: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 13,591.33 13,591.33 DUE TO OTHER AGENCIES 1,385,327.57 1,385,327.57 1,215,077.29 DUE TO OTHER FUNDS INTEREST ADVANCE -DUE TO CITY 2,448,263.00 1,215,077.29 11,383,537.00 13,831,800.00 ACCRUED EXPENSES 16,468.50 16,468.50 PAYROLL LIABILITIES (22,026.91) (22,025.91) 598.35 STRONG MOTION INSTRUMENTS 598.35 78,981.50 FRINGE TOED LIZARD FEES 78,981.60 1,101.79 SUSPENSE 1,101.79 DUE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA PAYABLES TOTAL 3,905,837.63 12,615,082.79 16,520,920.42 ENGINEERING TRUST DEPOSITS SO. COAST AIR QUALITY DEPOSITS 14,499.00 LQRP DEPOSITS 14,499.00 881,851.62 DEVELOPER DEPOSITS 881,851.62 439,448.65 MISC. DEPOSITS 439,448.65 2,012,086.01 AGENCY FUND DEPOSITS 2,012,086.01 3,347,886.28 TOTAL DEPOSITS 3,333,386.28 14,499.00 DEFERRED REVENUE 113,800.00 11,378,904.00 11,492,704.00 OTHER LIABILITIES TOTAL 113,800.00 11,378,904.00 11,492,704.00 COMPENSATED ABSENCES PAYABLE 373,536.65 373,536.65 768,036.50 DUE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA 578,311.00 189,725.50 10,989,847.00 10,989,847.00 DUE TO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 8,747,405.50 8,747,405.50 DUE TO C.V. UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. DUE TO DESERT SANDS SCHOOL DIST. 64,335,000.00 7,750,000.00 72,085,000.00 BONDS PAYABLE 1. TOTAL LONG TERM DEBT 951,847.65 84,261,978.00 7,750,000.00 92,963,825.65 TOTAL LIABILITIES 7,353,023.91 951,847.65 24,008,485.79 84,261,978.00 7,750,000.00 124,325,335.35 EQUITY -FUND BALANCE 55,846,972.68 20,711,742.00 54,296,391.80 9,988,279.05 650,038.45 141,493,423.98 TOTAL LIABILITY & EQUITY 63,199,996.59 20,711,742.00 951,847.65 78,304,877.59 9,988,279.05 84,261,978.00 650,038 45 7,750,000.00 265,818,759.33 (0.08) 0.00 (,08) CASH & INVESTMENT TOTAL 112,034,831.55 PREMIUM/DISCOUNT ON INVESTMENT 68-696.09 TOTAL 112,103,527.64 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: ITEM TITLE: Transmittal of Revenue and Expenditure Report for January 31, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File March 19, 2002 BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 3 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Transmittal of the January 31, 2002 Statement of Revenue and Expenditures for the City of La Quinta. R s ectf Ily submi ed., Joh M. Falconer Finance Director Approved for submission b Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Revenue and Expenditures Report, January 31, 2002 0 CITY OF LA QUINTA REVENUES - ALL FUNDS 07/01/2001 - 01/31/2002 FUNDS BUDGET RECEIVED RECEIVED General $14,332,929.75 $8,120,212.16 56.7% Library 95,000.00 87,913.18 92.5% Gas Tax Revenue 435,318.27 339,947.25 78.1 % Cmaq/Istea 287,423.00 0.00 0.0% Federal Assistance 543,825.00 305,617.99 56.2% Assessment District 2000-1 0.00 10,712.62 0.0% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 102,391.75 101,263.98 98.9% Local Law Enforcement 27,004.00 27,169.77 100.6% Lighting & Landscaping 781,400.00 407,576.75 52.2% Quimby 16,500.00 137,129.00 831.1 % Infrastructure 11,000.00 79,759.50 725.1 % Village Parking 100.00 0.00 0.0% South Coast Air Quality 24,481.00 15,685.04 64.1 % LQ Public Safety Officer 2,200.00 2,263.39 102.9% Interest Allocation 0.00 269,029.22 0.0% Capital Improvement 50,616,743.76 6,786,638.43 13.4% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 450.90 0.0% Urban Forestry 11,000.00 0.00 0.0% Equipment Replacement 363,180.00 351,402.28 96.8% Information Technology 1,000,000.00 1,015,575.40 101.6% Arts In Public Places 132,900.00 80,327.60 60.4% Transportation 3071100.00 406,775.50 132.5% Parks & Recreation 221,500.00 225,895.10 102.0% Civic Center 323,100.00 324,245.34 100.4% Library Development 167,900.00 133,866.42 79.7% Community Center 58,600.00 60,193.54 102.7% Street Facility 10,500.00 12,458.33 118.7% Park Facility 3,200.00 3,389.35 105.9% La Quinta Financing Authority 688,130.00 492,179.06 71.5% RDA Project Area No. 1 80,489,860.00 69,118,611.92 85.9% RDA Project Area No. 2 11,376,903.00 5,066,017.74 44.5% Total $162,430,189.53 $93,982,306.76 57.9% O J CITY OF LA QUINTA EXPENDITURES -ALL FUNDS 07/01/2001 - 01/31/2002 FUNDs BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED REMAINING BUDGET % EXPENDED General $15,525,709.02 $6,836,558.74 $104,730.28 $8,584,420.00 44.0% Library 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Gas Tax 594,378.00 245,933.31 0.00 348,444.69 41.4% Cmaq/Istea 287,423.00 0.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.0% Federal Assistance 166,638.99 31,813.99 0.00 134,825.00 19.1 % Proposed Assessment District 682,553.47 247,542.46 0.00 435,011.01 36.3% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 100,191.75 0.00 0.00 100,191.75 0.0% Local Law Enforcement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Lighting & Landscaping 781,400.00 455,816.69 0.00 325,583.31 58.3% Quimby 317,381.29 147,761.82 0.00 169,619.47 46.6% Infrastructure 4,361,124.00 344,991.67 0.00 4,016,132.33 7.9% Village Parking (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% South Coast Air Quality 0.00 4,836.69 0.00 (4,836.69) 0.0% Lq Public Safety Officer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Interest Allocation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Capital Improvement 50,616,744.39 6,786,638.42 2,000.00 43,828,105.97 13.4% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 63,579.59 0.00 (63,579.59) 0.0% Urban Forestry 11,000.00 0.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.0% Equipment Replacement 380,209.00 101,462.39 11,299.04 267,447.57 26.7% Arts In Public Places 689,515.71 36,292.50 0.00 653,223.21 5.3% Transportation 2,850,019.03 154,486.02 0.00 2,695,533.01 5.4% Parks & Recreation 2,060,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,060,000.00 0.0% Civic Center 204,660.00 119,385.00 0.00 85,275.00 58.3% Library Development 623,324.00 19,340.72 0.00 603,983.28 3.1 % Community Center 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Street Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Park Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Information Technology 476,372.00 189,720.54 28,839.28 257,812.18 39.8% La Quinta Financing Authority 1,209,498.78 488,259.00 0.00 721,239.78 40.4% RDA Project Area No. 1 48,031,473.46 33,233,606.09 0.00 14,797,867.37 69.2% RDA Project Area No. 2 16,076,521.44 4,588,196.73 6,400.00 11,481,924.71 28.5% Total $146,044 244.48 $54,096,222.37 $153,268.60 $91,794,753.51 37.0% CITY OF LA QUINTA GENERAL FUND REVENUES DETAIL TAXES: Property Tax No Low Property Tax Distribution Document Transfer Tax Sales Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Franchise Tax TOTAL TAXES LICENSE & PERMITS: Business License Animal License Building Permits Plumbing Permits Electrical Permits Mechanical Permits Misc. Permits TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS FEES: Sale of Maps & Publications Community Services Fees Bldg & Safety Fees Community Development Fees Public Works Fees TOTAL FEES INTERGOVERNMENTAL Motor Vehicle In -Lieu Motor Vehicle Code Fines Parking Violations Misc. Fines AB939 State of California Grant CSA152 Assessment TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL INTEREST MISCELLANEOUS Miscellaneous Revenue Cash Over/(Short) TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFER IN TOTAL GENERAL FUND 07/01/2001 - 01 /31/2002 REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 520,600.00 345,534.29 175,065.71 66.370% 450,600.00 373,825.77 76,774.23 82.960% 380,000.00 219,438.42 160,561.58 57.750% 3,217,500.00 1,761,121.66 1,456,378.34 54.740% 3,595,000.00 1,204,566.66 2,390,433.34 33.510% 537,500.00 116,522.51 420,977.49 21.680% 81701,200.00 4,021,009.31 4,680,190.69 46.210% 152,000.00 93,283.90 58,716.10 61.370% 12,400.00 6,646.75 5,753.25 53.600% 412,500.00 681,436.80 (268,936.80) 165.200% 89,400.00 109,205.83 (19,805.83) 122.150% 68,000.00 114,999.91 (46,999.91) 169.120% 37,000.00 63,449.52 (26,449.52) 171.490% 48,300.00 27,154.25 21,145.75 56.220% 819,600.00 1,096,176.96 (276,576.96) 133.750% 2,150.00 548.68 1,601.32 25.520% 157,825.00 93,654.35 64,170.65 59.340% 357,950.00 457,819.49 (99,869.49) 127.900% 222,000.00 124,813.46 97,186.54 56.220% 468,550.00 344,946.64 123,603.36 73.620% 1,208,475.00 1,021,782.62 186,692.38 84.550% 1,257,600.00 700,016.97 557,583.03 55.660% 50,300.00 18,753.29 31,546.71 37.280% 25,000.00 32,512.00 (7,512.00) 130.050% 5,000.00 7,214.83 (2,214.83) 144.300% 159,900.00 84,126.94 75,773.06 52.610% 134,105.00 72,038.80 62,066.20 53.720% 126,700.00 32,309.17 94,390.83 25.500% 1,758,605.00 946,972.00 811,633.00 53.850% 1,535,600.00 1,027,262.57 508,337.43 66.900% 27,700.00 7,020.41 20,679.59 25.340% 0.00 (11.71) 11.71 0.000% 27,700.00 7,008.70 20,691.30 25.300% 281,749.75 0.00 281,749.75 0.000% 14,332,929.75 8,120,212.16 6,212,717.59 56.650% a� Ut,3 CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL LIBRARY: County of Riverside Interest TOTAL LIBRARY GAS TAX REVENUE: Section 2105 Section 2106 Section 2107 Section 2107.5 Traffic Congestion Relief Interest TOTAL GAS TAX CMAQIISTEA CMAQ/ISTEA Grant Interest TOTAL CMAQ/ISTEA FEDERAL ASSISTANCE REVENUE: CDBG Grant Interest TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1 Interest Assessment Bond Proceeds Prepayments -sewer assessments Transfer in TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SLESF (COPS) REVENUE: SLESF (Cops) Funding Interest TOTAL SLESF (COPS) LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT REVENUE: LLEBG Funding Interest Transfer in TOTAL LLEBG LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING REVENUE: Assessment Developer Interest TOTAL LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING QUIMBY REVENUE: Quimby Fees Interest TOTAL QUIMBY REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 75,000.00 75,000.00 0.00 100.000% 20,000.00 12,913.18 7,086.82 64.570% 95.000.00 87.913.18 7.086.82 92.540% 135,600.00 95,538.57 40,061.43 70.460% 98,200.00 65,291.33 32,908.67 66.490% 175,100.00 126,257.40 48,842.60 72.110% 5,000.00 6,000.00 (1,000.00) 120.000% 13,718.27 39,324.42 (25,606.15) 286.660% 7,700.00 7,535.53 164.47 97.860% 435 318.27 339,947.25 95,371.02 78.090% 287,423.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 287 423.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.000% 543,825.00 305,617.99 238,207.01 56.200% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 543,825.00 305,617.99 238,207.01 56.200% 10,712.62 (10,712.62) 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 10,712.62 (10,712.62) 0.000% 100,191.75 100,191.75 0.00 100.000% 2,200.00 1,072.23 1,127.77 48.740% 102,391.75 101 263.98 1,127.77 98.900% 26,704.00 26,704.00 0.00 100.000% 300.00 465.77 (165.77) 155.260% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 27,004.00 27,169.77 (165.77) 100.610% 781,400.00 407,576.75 373,823.25 52.160% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 781,400.00 407,576.75 373,823.25 52.160% 126,375.00 (126,375.00) 0.000% 16,500.00 10,754.00 5,746.00 65.180% 16,500.00 137,129.00 (120,629.00) 831.080% CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL REMAINING % (continued) BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED INFRASTRUCTURE REVENUE: Infrastructure Fee 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 11,000.00 79,759.50 (68,759.50) 725.090% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE 11,000.00 79,759.50 (68,759.50) 725.090% VILLAGE PARKING REVENUE: Interest 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.000% TOTAL VILLAGE PARKING 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.000% SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY REVENUE: S.C.A.Q. Contribution 21,881.00 14,510.09 7,370.91 66.310% Interest 2,600.00 1,174.95 1,425.05 45.190% TOTAL SCAQ 24,481.00 15 685.04 8,795.96 64.070% LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER FUND Transfer In 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 100.000% Interest 200.00 263.39 (63.39) 131.700% TOTAL LQ PUBLIC SAFETY 2,200.00 2,263.39 (63.39) 102.880% INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND: Pooled Cash Allocated Interest 269,029.22 (269,029.22) 0.000% Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL INTEREST ALLOCATION 0.00 269,029.22 (269,029.22) 0.000% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: CVAG 13,655,958.18 2,399,662.12 11,256,296.06 17.570% CVWD 1,709,906.00 0.00 1,709,906.00 0.000% County of Riverside 0.00 0.00 0.000% State of Ca- Office Emer. Services 0.00 0.00 0.000% JPIA 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 100.000% IID 0.00 0.00 0.000% DSUSD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% State of California 530,600.00 0.00 530,600.00 0.000% SB300 Funding 19,365.74 0.00 19,365.74 0.000% Surface Transportation 12,000,118.00 0.00 12,000,118.00 0.000% SB821-Bicycle Path Grant 93,175.00 0.00 93,175.00 0.000% APP Contribution 0.00 0.00 0.000% Developer Agreement Funding 182,142.84 59,149.77 122,993.07 32.470% Transfers in From Other Funds 22,400,478.00 4,302,826.54 18,097,651.46 19.210% TOTAL CIP REVENUE 50,616,743.76 6,786,638.43 43,830,105.33 13.410% LQ NORTE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: Prepayment 0.00 0.00 0.000% Bond Proceeds 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 450.90 (450.90) 0.000% TOTAL LQ NORTE CIP 0.00 450.90 (450.90) 0.000% URBAN FORESTRY Grant Revenue Interest TOTAL URBAN FORESTRY 11,000.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 11,000.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.000% CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND: Equipment Charges Capital Contribution Interest Transfers In TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND: Charges for services Capital Contribution Interest Transfers In TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES REVENUE: Arts in Public Places Arts in Public Places Credits Applied Interest TOTAL ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES TRANSPORTATION Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL TRANSPORTATION PARKS & RECREATION Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION CIVIC CENTER Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL CIVIC CENTER LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY CENTER Developer fees Interest TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 304,980.00 304,982.00 (2.00) 100.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 58,200.00 46,420.28 11,779.72 79.760% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 363,180.00 351,402.28 11,777.72 96.760% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 15,575.40 (15,575.40) 0.000% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 100.000% 1,000,000.00 1,015,575.40 (15,575.40) 101.560% 111,300.00 65,731.91 45,568.09 59.060% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 21,600.00 14,595.69 7,004.31 67.570% 132,900.00 80,327.60 52,572.40 60.440% 284,000.00 332,981.77 (48,981.77) 117.250% 23,100.00 73,793.73 (50,693.73) 319.450% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 307,100.00 406,775.50 (99,675.50) 132.460% 201,000.00 202,936.00 (1,936.00) 100.960% 20,500.00 22,959.10 (2,459.10) 112.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 221,500.00 225,895.10 (4,395.10) 101.980% 284,500.00 297,553.72 (13,053.72) 104.590% 38,600.00 26,691.62 11,908.38 69.150% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 323,100.00 324,245.34 (1,145.34) 100.350% 150,000.00 119,381.00 30,619.00 79.590% 17,900.00 14,485.42 3,414.58 80.920% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 167 900.00 133,866.42 34,033.58 79.730% 53,500.00 54,087.00 (587.00) 101.100% 5,100.00 6,106.54 (1,006.54) 119.740% 58,600.00 60,193.54 (1,593.54) 102.720% 05 v LJ CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) STREET FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL STREET FACILITY PARK FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL PARK FACILITY REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 9,500.00 11,111.57 (1,611.57) 116.960% 1,000.00 1,346.76 (346.76) 134.680% 10,500.00 12,458.33 (1,958.33) 118.650% 3,000.00 3,033.00 (33.00) 101.100% 200.00 356.35 (156.35) 178.180% 3,200.00 3,389.35 (189.35) 105.920% 07/01 /2001 - 01 /31 /2002 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REMAINING % BY DEPARTMENT BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED GENERAL GOVERNMENT: LEGISLATIVE 585,800.00 245,401.83 0.00 340,398.17 41.9% CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 613,200.00 281,670.53 483.75 331,045.72 45.9% ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 910,000.00 415,241.69 494,758.31 45.6% PERSONNEL/RISK MGT 572,872.00 405,247.14 0.00 167,624.86 70.7% TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 2,681,872.00 1,347,561.19 483.75 1,333,827.06 50.2% FINANCE: CITY CLERK COMMUNITY SERVICES SENIOR CENTER PARKS & RECREATION ADMINISTRATION PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAMS TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES POLICE BUILDING & SAFETY: FISCAL SERVICES 542,515.00 309,917.37 0.00 232,597.63 57.1 % CENTRAL SERVICES 311,205.00 145,066.24 20,796.00 145,342.76 46.6% TOTAL FINANCE 853,720.00 454,983.61 20,796.00 377,940.39 53.3% 373,650.00 191,695.82 181,954.18 51.3% 265,475.00 123,652.52 4,213.62 137,608.86 46.6% 812,058.00 330,800.53 8,049.03 473,208.44 40.7% 90,800.00 27,078.31 0.00 63,721.69 29.8% 1,168, 333.00 481, 531.36 12, 262.65 674, 538.99 41.2 % 4,189,385.75 1,142,333.96 30,732.88 3,016,318.91 27.3% BUILDING & SAFETY - ADMIN 179,700.00 103,084.85 0.00 76,615.15 57.4% CODE COMPLIANCE 478,484.00 225,429.06 0.00 253,054.94 47.1% ANIMAL CONTROL 166,043.00 84,330.78 0.00 81,712.22 50.8% BUILDING 713,488.00 367,927.73 0.00 345,560.27 51.6% EMERGENCY SERVICES 96,524.00 68,976.87 9,040.00 18,507.13 71.5% FIRE 67,278.00 11,916.34 0.00 55,361.66 17.7% CIVIC CENTER BUILDING -OPERATIONS 1,088,751.00 775,116.84 0.00 313,634.16 71.2% TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY 2,790,268.00 1,636,782.47 9,040.00 1.144,445.53 58.7% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - ADMIN 472,450.00 201,044.93 0.00 271,405.07 42.6% CURRENT PLANNING 759,807.00 290,352.21 0.00 469,454.79 38.2% TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,232,257.00 491,397.14 0.00 740,859.86 39.9% PUBLIC WORKS: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 286,100.00 150,464.76 1,000.00 134,635.24 52.6% DEVELOPMENT & TRAFFIC 943,668.00 464,064.49 7,900.00 471,703.51 49.2% MAINT/OPERATIONS- STREETS 1,548,886.00 326,362.32 13,740.00 1,208,783.68 21.1% MAINT/OPERATIONS - LTG/LANDSCAPING 1,359,699.00 690,962.14 8,775.00 659,961.86 50.8% CAPITAL PROJECTS 387,420.00 104,814.68 0.00 282,605.32 27.1 % TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 4,525,773.00 1,736,668.39 31,415.00 2,757,689.61 38.4% TRANSFERS OUT 1,698,014.27 1,179,573.06 0.00 518,441.21 69.5% GENERAL FUND REIMBURSEMENTS (3,987,564.00) (1,825,968.26) 0.00 (2,161,595.74) 45.8% NET GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 15 525 709.02 6,836,558.74 104 730.28 8,584,420.00 44.0% CITY OF LA QUINTA OTHER CITY FUNDS EXPENDITURE SUMMARY LIBRARY FUND: PROJECT EXPENDITURES GAS TAX REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND TRANSFER OUT REIMBURSE GE QUIMBY FUND: TRANSFER OUT FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND: TRANSFER OUT 07/01/2001-01/31/2002 REMAINING % BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 421,600.00 245,933.31 0.00 175,666.69 58.3% 172,778.00 0.00 0.00 172,778.00 0.0% TOTAL GAS TAX 594,378.00 245,933.31 0.00 348,444.69 41.4% 317,381.29 147,761.82 0.00 169,619:47 46.6% 166,638.99 31,813.99 0.00 134,825:00 19.1% SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 4,836.69 0.00 (4,836.69) 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 0.00 4,836.69 0.00 (4,836.69) 0.0% CMAQ/ISTEA TRANSFER OUT 287,423.00 0.00 0.00 287,423:00 0.0% VILLAGE Parking TRANSFER OUT (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRIBUTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% LLEBG FUND TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% SLESF (COPS) TRANSFER OUT 100 191.75 0.00 0.00 100 191.75 0.0% LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DIST: REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 781,400.00 455,816.69 0.00 325,583.31 58.3% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL LTG/LANDSCAPING FUND 781,400.00 455,816.69 0.00 325,583.31 58.3% INFRASTRUCTURE FUND CONSTRUCTION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 4,361,124.00 344,991.67 0.00 4,016,132.33 7.9% TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE 4,361,124.00 344 991.67 0.00 4,016,132.33 7.9% ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1 COSTS OF ISSUANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER TO AGENCY FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 682,553.47 247,542.46 0.00 435,011.01 36.3% TOTAL AD 2000-1 682 553.47 247 542.46 0.00 435 011.01 36.3% CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2001 - 01/31/2002 OTHER CITY FUNDS REMAINING % EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 2,850,019.03 154,486.02 0.00 2,695,533.01 5.4% TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 2,850,019.03 154 486.02 0.00 2,695,533.01 5.4% PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 2,060,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,060,000.00 0.0% TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 2,060,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,060,000.00 0.0% CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 204,660.00 119,385.00 0.00 85,275.00 58.3% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL CIVIC CENTER 204 660.00 119 385.00 0.00 85 275.00 58.3% LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 623,324.00 19,340.72 0.00 603,983.28 3.1 % TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 623 324.00 19 340.72 0.00 603 983.28 3.1 % COMMUNITY CENTER PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% STREET FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL STREET FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% PARK FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL PARK FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 49,434,041.01 6,596,836.16 2,000.00 42,835,204.85 13.3% PROJECT REIMBURSEMENTS TO GEN FUND 1,182,703.38 189,802.26 0.00 992,901.12 16.0% TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 50 616 744.39 6,786,638.42 2,000.00 43 828 105.97 13.4% ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND MAINTENANCE EXPENSES-APP 2,000.00 1,425.00 0.00 575.00 71.3% OPERATING EXPENSES-APP 5,000.00 (785.00) 0.00 5,785.00 -15.7% ART PURCHASES 265,340.00 27.737.50 0.00 237,602.50 10.5% TRANSFER OUT 417,175.71 7,915.00 0.00 409,260.71 1.9% TOTAL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES 689 515.71 36 292.50 0.00 653 223.21 5.3% LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND PROJECT EXPENSES 0.00 4,176.20 0.00 (4,176.20) 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 59,403.39 0.00 (59,403.39) 0.0% TOTAL LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND 0.00 63 579.59 0.00 (63,579.59) 0.0% URBAN FORESTRY GRANT TRANSFER OUT 11 000.00 0.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.0% VILLAGE PARKING TRANSFER OUT (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 476 372.00 189 720.54 28 839.28 257 812.18 39.8% EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 380 209.00 101 462.39 11 299.04 267 447.57 26.7% V 2 T a 0 4ht 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: BUSINESS SESSION: March 19, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: Approval of Amendment No. 1 to the STUDY SESSION: Reimbursement Agreement between the City of La Quinta and JDD, L.L.C. Regarding Offsite Street Improvements - La Quinta PUBLIC HEARING: Court Development Authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement between the City of La Quinta and JDD, L.L.C. subject to approval of the Amendment wording by the City Attorney, to reimburse Development Impact Fee (DIF)-eligible off -site improvements associated with La Quinta Court development in an amount not to exceed $100,000, in addition to the $146,000 in DIF reimbursements previously approved in the Reimbursement Agreement. The additional developer assistance commitment in an amount not to exceed $100,000 for Amendment No. 1 will be funded from the Transportation DIF Fund, Account No. 250-000- 300-290. Funding is available in this account. The previously approved Reimbursement Agreement provided reimbursements from the following accounts: DIF reimbursement - Not to Exceed $146,000 Additional developer assistance - Not to Exceed $240,000 None. Transportation DIF Fund, Account No. 250-000- 300-290. General Fund Reserves, Economic Account No. 101-000-300-290. 063 T:\PW DEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020319e. wpd La Quinta Court is a mixed use commercial development currently under construction on the southeast corner of Highway 1 1 1 and Washington Street. Off -site improvements conditioned upon the developer include the widening of Washington Street. All of the proposed widening occurs on the east side because there is no opportunity for widening on the west side. Washington Street will be improved from four lanes to six lanes plus a dedicated right turn lane on the east side. Signal modifications are required due to the proposed street widening. On April 3, 2001, the City Council authorized the City Manager to enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with JDD, L.L.C. to reimburse DIF-eligible off -site improvements associated with the La Quinta Court development in an amount not to exceed $146,000, and additional assistance in an amount not to exceed $240,000 for approved infrastructure improvements that are outside the scope of the DIF reimbursable improvements. As a development condition, the developer is required to pay for the outer 20 feet of street improvements along the project frontage(s). However, the design and construction of the median island area, additional lane widening, and traffic signal improvements are subject to reimbursement through the DIF. When the DIF was established for this intersection and street segment, detailed plans were not available. The DIF reimbursements were based on "industry standard" unit costs and assumed quantities for a typical intersection. Now that plans have been completed and formal construction bids obtained, the magnitude of work is higher than originally anticipated. This is due to the complexity of the project, unusual traffic control requirements (requiring multiple traffic control phases), increased removal and replacement quantities and increased engineering fees due to requested plan revisions. The current contractor's construction cost for the off -site improvements (for Washington Street, Highway 1 1 1, and Simon Drive) is now approximately $571,500. The construction cost related to the non-DIF-eligible improvements along Washington Street, Highway 1 1 1, and Simon Drive are summarized below: Washington Street $246,21 1 Simon Drive $53,849 Highway 111 $25,000 Total non-DIF improvements: $325,060 The difference in costs between the current construction bid of $571,500 and the non-DIF areas of $325,060 is $246,440, and is considered to be DIF-eligible. To date, $146,000 from the DIF fund and $240,000 in additional assistance from the General Fund Economic Development Reserves have been committed to this project. Additional reimbursement of approximately $100,440 from the DIF would be within the amount established as DIF-eligible off -site improvements. 06 , 002 T:\PW DEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020319e. wpd Alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement between the City of La Quinta and JDD, L.L.C., subject to approval of the Amendment wording by the City Attorney, to reimburse DIF-eligible off -site improvements associated with La Quinta Court development in an amount not to exceed $100,000, in addition to the $146,000 in DIF reimbursements previously approved in the Reimbursement Agreement; or 2. Do not authorize the City Manager to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement between the City of La Quinta and JDD, L.L.C., subject to approval of the Addendum wording by the City Attorney, to reimburse DIF-eligible off -site improvements associated with La Quinta Court street improvements in an amount not to exceed $100,000, in addition to the $146,000 in DIF reimbursements previously approved in the Reimbursement Agreement; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectf subrr�itt d, oy F. Stephenson, P.E. Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement 0 65 003 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020319e.wpd ATTACHMENT 1 City of La Quinta Reimbursement Agreement La Quinta Court Amendment No. 1 Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement dated April 3, 2001 (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this day of , 2002, by and between JDD, L.L.C. (Dale Frank & Associates), a Washington Limited Liability Company ("JDD") and the City of La Quinta, California, a California Municipal Corporation (the "City"). A. WHEREAS, JDD is the developer of property in the City known as La Quinta Court ("Plan") which is located on the southeast corner of Highway 1 1 1 and Washington Street; B. WHEREAS, Section 13.E. of the original Reimbursement Agreement authorizes written amendments, the City and JDD hereby amend the original Reimbursement Agreement. C. WHEREAS, Conditions of Approval for the Plan obligate JDD to improve various portions of both Washington Street and Highway 111 lying adjacent to the Plan ("Required Improvements"); D. WHEREAS, the Required Improvements include the widening of Washington Street; E. WHEREAS, a portion of the costs for the Required Improvements may be reimbursed by the City's Developer Impact Fund ("DIF") in an amount not to exceed $246,000 as follows: Initial Authorization - DIF Reimbursement per the April 3, 2001 Reimbursement Agreement $146,000 Amendment No. 1 (Additional DIF Reimbursement) $100,000 F. WHEREAS, the terms, responsibilities and conditions as listed in Items 1-15 of the original Reimbursement Agreement dated April 3, 2001, shall remain in full force and effect. 063 4 005 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020319e.wpd IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written above. CITY: Rv: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager ATTEST: June Greek, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M . Katherine Jenson, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California JDD: JDD, L.L.C. 7900 South East 28th Street #405 Mercer Island, Washington Street 92040 By: Title: By: Title: T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020319e.wpd AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL,/RDA MEETING DATE: March 19, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution Granting Conditional STUDY SESSION: Approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map 29791, La Quinta Court PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map 29791, La Quinta Court, JDD, LLC. None. None. Parcel Map 29791 is located east of Washington Street, south of Highway 1 1 1 and north of Simon Drive (Attachment 1), and consists of 1 (one) commercial lot (Attachment 2). The developer has requested the City Council's conditional approval of the Final Map which will allow 30 days for completion of its processing. As of March 7, 2002, City staff has received approval of a technically correct Final Map from the City's Acting Surveyor. A Subdivision Improvement Agreement has been executed by the developer and the associated securities have been received. As a result, City staff has prepared the attached Resolution which provides for conditional approval of the Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement. The approval is contingent upon recording a technically correct Final Map by the County Recorder with all required signatures except for the City Clerk, within 30 days (April 18, 2002). Once conditional approval is granted, the City Clerk will affix the City Seal to the Final Map and offer the Final Map for recording by the County Recorder. The developer has demonstrated to City staff that sufficient progress has been made with the documents required for conditional final map approval. 003 T:\PW DEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020319a. wpd The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map 29791, La Quinta, JDD, LLC; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map 29791, La Quinta, JDD, LLC; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully subm 1pd, Rely F:/Stephe&tSfi,"P.E. Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Vicinity Map 2. Tract Map 3. Subdivision Improvement Agreement o� TAPWDEPT\STAFF\Martinez\Staff Reports\PM29791.wpd RESOLUTION NO. 2002- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF LA QUINTA GRANTING CONDITIONAL FINAL MAP APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP 29791, AND AUTHORIZING A TIME EXTENSION FOR SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO VALIDATE THE APPROVAL WHEREAS, the City Council conducts only two regular meetings per month and the time interval between these meetings occasionally creates an undue hardship for business enterprises and individuals seeking approval of subdivision maps, and WHEREAS, the City Council as a matter of policy allows a subdivider to have city staff present the map for approval consideration when the requisite items necessary for final map approval are nearly, but not completely, finished thus yielding to the subdivider additional production time for preparation of those items, and WHEREAS, the subdivider has demonstrated to city staff and the City Council that it has made sufficient progress with items required for final map approval, and it is reasonable to expect the subdivider to satisfactorily complete the items, including city staff review time, within thirty (30) days without adversely impacting other ongoing work commitments of city staff, and WHEREAS, Section 66458(b) of the Subdivision Map Act grants the City Council broad authority to authorize time extensions regarding final map approval, or disapproval, upon receiving it for consideration, and WHEREAS, the City Council relies on professional city staff to review all required items for conformance with relevant requirements, and it is therefore appropriate for the City Council to approve the Final Map subject to review and confirmation of the required items by professional city staff, within a reasonable period of time as specified by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of La Quinta does hereby find, determine, order and resolve as follows: Section I. The final map for Parcel Map 29791 is conditionally approved provided the subdivider submits all required items on or before April 18, 2002. Section 2. The City Council's approval of the Final Map shall not be considered valid until the City Engineer has signed the map indicating that it conforms with the tentative map, the Subdivision Map Act and all ordinances of the City. Section -a. The City Engineer shall withhold his signature from the map until the subdivider has completed the following requirement to the City Engineer's satisfaction. 003 A. Has obtained all requisite signatures on the map title page, except for the City Clerk's signature. Section 4. The City Clerk shall withhold affixing the City Seal to the map title page, along with her attesting signature, until the City Engineer has signed the map. Section 5. The time extension for satisfying the requirements of the conditional approval for this final map shall expire when City offices close for regular business on April 18, 2002. If the subdivider has not satisfied the requirements in Section 3, herein, by the expiration deadline, the Final Map shall be considered disapproved. Disapproval does not deny any rights the subdivider may have under the Map Act to resubmit the final map for approval, or disapproval. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 191h day of March, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PEIVA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California ATTACHMENT 1 ppOJECT SITE 1\1 - -rl-\ VICINITY MAP NO SCALE ATTACHMENT 2 007 Is g 3 1 �n : W W h h W1 W W W W W I\ R ■okuNPI .r�,` g� I g$ gal I p ti 9 @� 6N9 I uq O it W 1� g; r {7.� W LyR4 A� �b �a 34W = L snwd dodw I m i.aa a N ` Zip T.cT,�i►"� ' ug � ' ♦� �� Sri 3\ 6 s CayofLAQunuA ATTACHMENT 1 SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT Parcel Map 29791 THIS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this day of , 20 , by and between JDD, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company hereinafter referred to as "Subdivider," and the City of La Quinta, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City." RECITALS: A. Subdivider has prepared and filed a final map or parcel map (the "Map") of a unit of land in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, which unit of land is known as Parcel Map 29791 (the "Tract") pursuant to the provisions of Section 66410, et sec. of the California Government Code (the "Subdivision Map Act"). B. Prior to approval of the Map, Subdivider is required to install or agree to install certain public and private improvements (the "Improvements"). C. The Improvements have not been installed and accepted at this time. D. It is therefore necessary that Subdivider and City enter into an agreement for the installation of the Improvements as provided in Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Improvement Plans. Prior to submittal of the Map for approval by the City Council, Subdivider shall fumish original improvement plans meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. 2. Improvements. Subdivider shall construct the public and private street, drainage, utility, landscaping, and other improvements required to be constructed or agreed to be constructed under this Agreement as listed in Exhibit "A", and shall bear the full cost thereof. The methods, standards, specifications, sequence, and scheduling of construction shall be as approved by the City Engineer. 3. Improvement Security. A. One class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "performance security," shall assure the faithful performance of this Agreement including construction of the Improvements, payment of Subdivider's fair share of Improvements which have been or will be constructed by others ("Participatory Improvements"), and payment of plan check and permit fees. A second class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "payment security, shall assure the payment of the cost of labor, equipment and materials supplied to construct the Improvements. A third class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "warranty security," shall serve as a guarantee and warranty of the Improvements for a period of one year following the completion and acceptance of the Improvements. Subdivider shall fumish performance and payment security prior to and as a condition of City Council approval of the Map. Subdivider shall provide warranty security after Improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council and prior to or concurrently with the final release of performance security. Warranty security shall not be required for Monumentation or Participatory Improvements. However, the City may utilize Monumentation Security for performance of or payment for the work in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. As part of the obligation secured by each of the performance security, payment security and warranty security, and in addition to the face amount of each such security, each such security shall include and assure the payment of costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attomey's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing the obligations thereby secured. B. Improvement security shall conform with Section 66499 of the California Government Code and one or more of the following: 1) A cash deposit vrith City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company, at City's option. T:\PWDEPTISTAFF\Martinez\Tracts\agreements\29791.wpd Page 1 6' 009 2) Surety bonds, of the form specified in subsection 66499.2 of the California Government Code, issued by a surety or sureties listed in the U.S. Department of Treasury Circular 570 (latest version). 3) Certificates of deposit, in City's name, from one or more financial institutions subject to regulation by the state or federal government and having a financial quality rating of "A" or better and a commitment reliability rating of "R-2" or better on the Investment Data Exchange (of the Los Angeles County Treasurer's office). 4) Irrevocable letters of credit, issued by one or more financial institutions meeting the requirements of Paragraph (3), pledging that the funds necessary to carry out the completion of the Improvements are on deposit, guaranteed for payment, and constitute a trust fund which is not subject to levy or attachment by any creditor of the depositor until released by City. Letters of credit shall guarantee that all or any portion of the funds available pursuant to the letters of credit will be paid upon the written demand of City and that such written demand need not present documentation of any type as a condition of payment, including proof of loss. The duration of any such letter of credit shall be for a period of not less than one year from the execution of the agreement with which it is provided and shall state, on its face, that the letter of credit will be automatically renewed until such time that City authorizes its expiration or until sixty (60) days after City receives notice from the financial institution of intent to allow expiration of the letter of credit. 5) A lien upon the subdivided property, if City finds that it would not be in the public interest to require the installation of the Improvements sooner than two (2) years after recordation of the final map or parcel map for which the Improvements are required. The lien shall provide a collateral value of three (3) times the estimated cost of the Improvements and shall include the power of sale of the real property, all buildings and improvements thereon, or that may be erected upon or made thereto, together with all hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in any wise appertaining, and the reservations, remainders, rents, issues, and profits thereof. The collateral value of the property shall be established at Subdivider's expense through an appraisal approved by City. 6) An instrument of credit from an agency of the state, federal or local government, when any agency of the state, federal, or local government provides at least Twenty Percent (20%) of the financing for the Improvements. 7) When Subdivider is a non-profit organization, security may be negotiable bonds, of the kind approved for securing deposits of public moneys with City or in favor of City, as specified in Section 16430 of the California Government Code, deposited, at City's option, with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company. C. All securities shall be furnished in accordance with the provisions of Exhibit A. The amount of the performance security shall equal One -Hundred Percent (100%) of the estimated cost of constructing the Improvements, including payment of plan check and permit fees, as estimated by the City Engineer or a duly authorized representative of the City Engineer. The amount of Payment security shall equal the amount of the amount of performance security, except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A, and shall be furnished as a separate security. Warranty security shall equal Ten Percent (10%) of the amount of performance security except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A. D. At the time of submittal of security, Subdivider shall pay to City administrative fees applicable to the form of security provided. Administrative fees shall apply to the subdivision (final map, parcel map or waiver of parcel map) rather than to individual security instruments. The fees shall be paid separately for each different form and/or source (surety or financial institution) of security initially submitted and for substitution of securities but shall not be required for submittal of warranty security if the warranty security is of the same form and from the same source as the performance security it replaces. Administrative fees for security shall be as follows: 1) For certificates of deposit, bonds and letters of credit as described in Paragraphs 2), 3) and 4) of SECTION 3.13., which require the establishment of evidence of the reliability of the surety or financial institution, the administrative fee shall be One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00). T:\PWDEMSTAFF\Martinez\Tracts\agreements\29791.wpd 0'1 °U Page 2 of 6 0 1_ 0 2) For liens on real property as described in Paragraph 5) of SECTION 3.13., for which City will prepare lien agreements and subordination agreements, administer valuation of the real property and administer the agreements over the life of the lien, all of which require legal assistance and financial advice, Subdivider shall pay to City an administration fee of One Half of One Percent (0.5%) of the estimated cost of the improvements secured but not less than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) nor more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00). 3) For other forms of security listed in Section 3 B, above, there will be no administrative fee. E. Participatory, Improvements, if any, are identified in Exhibit A. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place until the Participatory Improvements are constructed and actual costs are known and paid by Subdivider, or until Subdivider pays to City the estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements, and shall guarantee the reimbursement by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost of the Participatory Improvements. Payment security and warranty security shall not be required for Participatory Improvements. Upon written demand from City, Subdivider shall deposit cash with City in lieu of or in replacement of security guaranteeing Participatory Improvements. If Subdivider fails to deposit said cash within 30 days of the date of the written demand from City, City may present a written demand to Subdivider's Surety for payment of said cash and Subdivider's Surety shall pay to City the lesser of: 1) the amount demanded, or 2) the amount of the security. F. Security shall not expire, be reduced or become wholly or partially invalid for any reason, including non-payment of premiums, modifications of this Agreement and/or expiration of the time for performance stated in this Agreement, without express authorization from City unless the surety provides City with sixty (60) days written notice by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. G. Security shall be released in the following manner: 1) Performance security shall be released upon the final completion and acceptance or approval, by the City Council of the Improvements subject to the provisions of paragraph B. 2) The City Engineer may authorize partial reduction of performance security as work progresses, upon application by Subdivider. However, no such reduction shall be for an amount less than Ten Percent (10%) of the total performance security provided for the faithful performance of the act or work. In no event shall security be reduced below that required to guarantee the completion of the act or work or obligation secured, plus Ten Percent (10%). The City Engineer shall not allow more than two partial reductions of security furnished for any improvement agreement. 3) Participatory Improvement security shall be released upon payment by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost or estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements. 4) If City receives no notice of recorded claims of lien, labor and materials security shall be released in full 90 days after final acceptance and/or approval by the City Council, of the Improvements. If City receives notice of any recorded lien, the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act shall apply. 5) Warranty security not utilized during the warranty period shall be released one year after final acceptance or approval by the City Council of all Tract Improvements. However, if at the end of the one-year warranty period, there are one or more outstanding requests by City for performance of work or provision of materials under the terms of the warranty, warranty security shall be retained until the outstanding requests are satisfied or until Subdivider has made other arrangements satisfactory to the City Engineer. 4. Permits Required. Prior to commencing any phase of work, Subdivider shall obtain all permits required for that phase of work and pay all required fees. Work performed under a permit or permits shall comply with all provisions of the required permits. 5. Off -site Improvements. When the construction of one or more of the Improvements requires or necessitates the acquisition of real property not owned by Subdivider or City, Subdivider shall use its best efforts purchase such real property at a reasonable price. In the event that Subdivider is unsuccessful, despite its best efforts, to acquire such real property at a reasonable price, Subdivider may request in writing that City attempt T:\PWDEPT\STAFRMartinez\Tracts\agreements\29791.wpd •i7 Page 0A Olt to acquire such real property. City may, but is not required to, agree to attempt to acquire such real property on behalf of Subdivider. If City so agrees, City and Subdivider shall enter a separate written agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Said separate agreement shall provide that Subdivider advance to City One Hundred Fifty Percent (150%) of the appraised fair market value of the real property. Any unexpended portion of said advance shall be refunded to Subdivider. Any additional funds required for acquisition of the real property shall be paid by Subdivider to City upon the conveyance of said real property to Subdivider. In no event shall the failure of Subdivider or City to acquire such real property excuse, waive, or otherwise terminate Subdivider's obligation to construct the applicable improvement pursuant to this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval. 6. Completion of Improvements. Subdivider shall begin construction of the Improvements within ninety (90) days and shall complete construction within twelve (12) months after the approval of this Agreement. Portions of the Improvements may be completed at a later date, as determined by the City Engineer or as set forth in Exhibit A. Failure by Subdivider to begin or complete construction of the Improvements within the specified time periods shall constitute cause for City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare Subdivider in default of this agreement, to revise improvement security requirements as necessary to ensure completion of the improvements, and/or to require modifications in the standards or sequencing of the Improvements in response to changes in standards or conditions affecting or affected by the Improvements. Said failure shall not otherwise affect the validity of this agreement or Subdivider's obligations hereunder. 7. Force Majeure. In the event that Subdivider is unable to perform within the time limits herein due to strikes, act of God, or other events beyond Subdivider's control, the time limits for obligations affected by such events will be extended by the period of such events. 8. Time Extension. Subdivider may make application in writing to the City Council for an extension of time for completion of the Improvements. The City Council, in its sole and absolute discretion, may approve or deny the request or conditionally approve the extension with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. As a condition of the time extension, Subdivider shall furnish securities, similar in form and substance to those required in SECTION 3 hereinabove, to cover the period of extension. The value of the securities shall be sufficient to ensure the performance of and payment for Improvements that remain incomplete at the time of the extension, and to provide warranty security on completed Improvements. 9. Survey Monuments. Before final approval of street improvements, Subdivider shall place survey monuments in accordance with the provisions of Sections 66495, et sec. of the Subdivision Map Act and of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Subdivider shall provide the City Engineer written proof that the monuments have been set, evidence of payment and receipt thereof by the engineer or surveyor setting the monuments, and intersection monument tie -outs for monuments set in public streets. 10. Final Acceptance of Improvements. At the completion of construction and prior to acceptance of the Improvements by City, Subdivider shall submit a request for final approval by City. The request shall be accompanied by any required certifications from Subdivider's engineers or surveyors, approval letters from other agencies having jurisdiction over and approval authority for improvements required by this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval, and any required construction quality documentation not previously submitted. Upon receipt of said request, the City Engineer or a duly -authorized representative will review the required documentation and will inspect the Improvements. If the Improvements are determined to be in accordance with applicable City standards and specifications, and as provided herein, obligations required by the Conditions of Approval and this Agreement have been satisfied, and Subdivider has provided revised plans as required in Paragraph 11, hereinafter, the City Engineer shall recommend acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council. 11. Revisions to Plans. When the Improvements have been inspected and approved by the City Engineer, Subdivider shall make any necessary revisions to the original plans held by City so the plans depict the actual Improvements constructed. 'When necessary revisions have been made, each separate sheet of the plans shall be clearly marked with the words "As -Built," "As -Constructed," or "Record Drawing," the marking shall be stamped O 13 T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\Martinez\Tracts\agreements\29791.wpd Page 4 of 6 012 by an engineer or surveyor, as appropriate for the improvements thereon, who is licensed to practice in California, and the plans shall be resubmitted to the City Engineer. 12. Improvement Warranty. Subdivider hereby guarantees the Improvements to City for a period of one (1) year, beginning on the date of final acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council, against any defective work or labor done, or defective materials fumished, and shall repair or replace such defective work or materials. 13. Release of Security. City shall retain and release securities in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of this agreement. Prior to the release of payment security, the City Engineer may require Subdivider to provide a title report or other evidence sufficient to show claims of lien, if any, that may affect the amount of payment security released. 14. City Right to Cure. If Subdivider fails to perform any obligation hereunder and such obligation has not been performed within sixty (60) days after written notice of default from City, then City may perform the obligation, and Subdivider shall pay the entire cost of such performance by City including costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing such obligation. In cases of emergency or compelling public interest, as determined by the City Engineer, the requirement for written notice of default and/or the passage of sixty (60) days shall be deemed waived and all other provisions of this Article shall remain in effect. 15. Indemnification. Subdivider hereby binds itself, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, executors, administrators, guarantors, heirs, and assigns, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold City and its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and assigns harmless from and against any losses, claims, demands, actions, or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, arising out of or in any way connected with Subdividers performance herein under, including costs of suit and reasonable attomeys' fees. 16. No Modification of Conditions. This Agreement shall in no respect act to modify or amend any provision of the Conditions of Approval. In the event that any requirement or condition of this Agreement is inconsistent with or fails to include one or more provisions of the Conditions of Approval, which document(s) is (are) incorporated herein by reference, the provisions in the Conditions of Approval shall remain in effect and shall control. 17. Severability. In the event that any provision or provisions of this Agreement are held unenforceable, all provisions not so held shall remain in full force and effect. 18. General Provisions A. All notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the parties at their respective addresses indicated hereon. Notices personally delivered shall be effective upon delivery. Notices mailed as provided herein and sent postage prepaid shall be effective upon the date of delivery or refusal indicated on the return receipt. Either party may change its address for notices hereunder by notice to the other given in the manner provided in this subparagraph. B. The terms, conditions, covenants, and agreements set forth herein shall apply to and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors of the parties hereto. C. Neither party to this Agreement relies upon any warranty or representation not contained in this Agreement. D. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted with respect to the laws of the State of California. E. In the event of any dispute between the parties with respect to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to prompt payment of its reasonable attorneys' fees from the non -prevailing party. F. Any failure or delay by either party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any such rights or remedies provided for hereunder. a'e"' T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\Martinez\Tracts\agreements\29791.wpd Page 5 of 6 013 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. CITY: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk 7Z4 WIDER: Title: M 11 p �' By: Title: Reviewed and Approved: City Engineer Approved as to Form: City Attorney Date Date Date City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 760/777-7075 JDD LLC, A Washington Limited Liability Co. (206)275-4130 Date Date T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\Martinez\Tracts\agreements\29791.wpd Page 6 of 6 014- Exhibit A SECURITY - PARCEL MAP 29791 Except as otherwise provided herein, Subdivider shall furnish performance security and labor & materials security prior to agendization of the Map for approval by the City Council. Improvements designated as "Participatory" have been or will be constructed by others. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place indefinitely until called upon or released by City. Monumentation security shall guarantee performance of or payment for the work and shall be utilized or released as specified in Chapter 4, Article 9 of the Subdivision Map Act. The "Engineering & Plans" security will be released when the City has possession of complete, approved, original plans, signed and sealed by a design professional(s), for all required improvements. The "No -Plan Contingency", which may be utilized for any listed item or for other cost found necessary in the design or construction of the required improvements, may be released in whole or part by the City Engineer, at any time after construction plans are complete and the scope and nature of improvements are fully known. These releases shall be separate from and in addition to the reductions discussed below. As elements of the work are completed, Subdivider may request a maximum of two partial releases of performance security. Partial releases shall be for not less than ten percent (10%) of the total performance security for the tract and shall not reduce total performance security below the amount necessary to complete the Improvements plus ten percent (10%) of the original amount. Partial releases of -performance security will be evaluated and may be granted, in whole or in part, by the City Engineer. Requests for partial releases, setting forth in detail the amount of work completed and the value thereof, shall be made in writing to the City Engineer. Labor & materials security shall remain in place until 90 days after all required tract improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council. Imlrovement Description Performance Washington Street Improvements 513,342 Simon Drive Improvements 53,850 Highway 111 Improvements 33,384 Grading 40,000 Domestic Water 215,410 Sanitary Sewer 3,002 Dry Utilities 47,003 Perimeter Landscaping 140,000 Construction Subtotal: $1,045,991 Engineering & Inspection (10% of Construction) 104,599 Contingency (10% of Project) 115,059 Construction Total: $1,265,649 Percent of Work Completed (70%) (879,649) City Assistance (386,000) Total Amount to Secure: $250,000 0 0l5 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this 8th day of March, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Dale F. Frank, Jr., to me known to be the Manager of JDD, LLC, a Washington limited liability company that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned; and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and r first ab eev ritten. h [Print Na a 1 L , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington My cornmission expires ` V 016, COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: March 19, 2001 ITEM TITLE: Approval to Award a Contract to Construct the Montero Estates Sound Wall Improvements, Project No. 2000-12 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Appropriate an additional $85,970 from Transportation Development Impact Fee (DIF) funds; and award a contract in the amount of $779,850 to Parsons Construction Company to construct the Montero Estates Sound Wall Improvements, Project No. 2000-12. The following represents the available funding and funding sources: Funding Source Infrastructure Transportation DIF Total: Amount Expended to Date: Amount Remaining: $98,177.00 ••• ••• •• $998,177.00 ($123,343.12) $874,833.88 Considering construction award in the amount of $779,850.00, the following represents the probable project construction budget by bid area: COMPONENT BASE BID 1 BASE BID 2 ADD ALT 1 TOTAL Construction $710,050.00 $30,450.00 $39,350.00 $779,850.00 Insp/Test/Survey $55,028.88 $2,359.88 $3,049.63 $60,438.38 Administration $35,502.50 $1,522.50 $1,967.50 $38,992.50 Sub -Total: $800,581.38 $34,332.38 $44,367.13 $879,280.88 Contingency $73,653.49 $3,433.24 $4,436.71 $81,523.44 Total: $874,234.86 $37,765.61 $48,803.84 $960,804.31 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020319c.wpd As illustrated, adequate funding is available to construct Base Bid Area 1. Base Bid Area 1 provides for the construction of an eight foot sound barrier from the top of curb on Washington Street and a six foot sound barrier from the top of curb on Avenue 50. Inclusion of Base Bid Area 2 requires an additional appropriation from the Transportation DIF Fund in the amount of $37,166.59. Base Bid Area 2 provides for the construction of pilasters, change in color, and landscaping and irrigation modifications to the existing wall along Washington Street, between Sagebrush and Saguaro in order to enhance the overall appearance of the wall. Inclusion of Additive Alternate 1 requires an additional appropriation from the Transportation DIF Fund in the amount of $48,204.82. Additive Alternate 1 raises the height of the wall by two feet and creates a ten foot sound barrier along Washington Street and a eight foot barrier along Avenue 50 which will better address the long term noise attenuation needs as traffic increases. Staff are recommending the award of all three bid areas. The award of all three bid areas requires an additional appropriation in the amount of $85,970.43. This project is funded entirely with local DIF. The project was bid without prevailing wage requirements. In October 1996, Gordon Bricken & Associates, Acoustical and Energy Engineers, prepared an analysis of all sound study reports completed for Washington Street including the area fronting Montero Estates. On February 16, 1999, a Study Session was conducted to discuss the sound attenuation along Washington Street fronting the Montero Estates tract. During the Study Session it was decided that additional clarifications were necessary to determine the type of mitigation that would be required along Washington Street to insure noise reduction within Montero Estates to levels indicated in the City's General Plan. On March 16, 1999, the City Council authorized Korve Engineering to proceed with an acoustical analysis of the Montero Estates for road noise from Washington Street and Avenue 50. The analysis was completed by Gordon Bricken & Associates and the report was presented to the City Council on June 11, 1999. Gordon Bricken's analysis concluded that a sound wall ranging from ten to twelve feet high would be required along the west side of Washington Street, and a sound wall up to eight feet high would be required along the north side of Avenue 50, in order to provide sufficient sound attenuation. T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020319c.wpd 002 On April 3, 2001, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) in the amount of $70,998 with Harris & Associates to prepare the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) for the Montero Estates Sound Wall Improvement Project No. 2000-12. On August 7, 2001, the City Council approved the "Berming and Sound Wall" concept for the Montero Estates Sound Wall and approved Contract Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $8,390.00 to Harris & Associates' PSA to prepare the PS&E to landscape and add pilasters to the Sagebrush Sound Wall. Staff was directed to secure bids for both six foot and eight foot high walls and to include enhancements to the wall at the corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50, and to include the wall extensions beyond the two entrances into Montero Estates. On November 19, 2001, a meeting was conducted with both the Casita's I and Casita's II Home Owners Associations. The purpose of the meeting was to review the proposed improvements and receive input regarding the removal of the existing perimeter walls, the removal and replacement of interior/exterior landscaping and irrigation, and the architectural appearance of the sound wall. The following representatives from Montero Estates were in attendance: Tom Rolapp, Vice -President, Casita's II Mark Dallanegra, Vice -President, Casita's I/President , Montero Estates General Fund Betty Hartz Smith, Secretary, Casita's II Vicky Johns, Homeowner Jim Montgomery, Homeowner Bob Winkles, Homeowner Alyce Schmid, Homeowner Jacques Ables, Homeowner On Monday, March 41 2002, sealed -bids were received and publically opened for the construction of this project. The following table illustrates the results of the bids received (a detailed bid comparison summary is provided as Attachment 1). Bid Area Engineer Base Bid 1 $826,700 Parsons $710,050 Base Bid 2 $51,150 $30,450 Add Alt 1 $62,100 $39,350 Denboer Cora RJ Bullard $761,190 $960,466 $1,249,500 $29,550 $42,750 $37,725 $39,150 $54,050 $85,550 TOTAL: $939,950 $779,850 $829,890 $1,057,266 $1,372,775 As illustrated, Parsons Construction Company submitted the lowest responsive bid for the proposed Montero Estates Sound Wall Improvements. T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020319C.wpd 003 The project was bid with two base bid areas and one additive alternate bid area. Base bid area number 1 includes the construction of a two foot berm and a six foot sound wall that results in an eight foot sound barrier from the top of curb on Washington Street and a six foot sound barrier from the top of curb on Avenue 50. Additive alternate 1 raises the height of the wall by two feet and creates a ten foot sound barrier along Washington Street and an eight foot barrier along Avenue 50. The wall will match the appearance, in both color and style, of the perimeter wall at Duna La Quinta. Base bid area number 2 provides for the construction of pilasters, change in color, and landscaping and irrigation modifications to the existing wall along Washington Street, between Sagebrush and Saguaro. The proposed. modifications are intended to change the appearance of the existing wall to match, to the extent possible, the proposed Montero Estates Sound Wall. Considering the City Council awards the project for construction on March 19, 2002, the following represents how the project is expected to proceed: Award Construction March 19 2002 Sign Contracts and Mobilize March 19 - 31, 2002 Construction Period 0 20 consecutive days) April 2002 - July 2002 Accept Improvements August 2002 The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Appropriate an additional $85,970 from Transportation Development Impact Fee funds; and award a contract in the amount of $779,850 to Parsons Construction Company to construct the Montero Estates Sound Wall Improvements, Project No. 2000-12; or 2. Do not appropriate an additional $85,970 from Transportation Development Impact Fee funds; and do not award a contract in the amount of $779,850 to Parsons Construction Company to construct the Montero Estates Sound Wall Improvements, Project No. 2000-12; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. TAPWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020319c.wpd n ) n I1� Respectfully submitted, . A - F;DILR F. Stephenson, P.E. terim Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: . 1. Bid Comparison Summary T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020319c.wpd 08� 005 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [-� 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 llO 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 V7 0 O 0 O 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 cn ,0 E O N_ " O n 'n 'O O N vl 'n vl -D N d' N �; V1 vi N O C, vi N O., Q' 69 (9 69 69 — 69 6 ) 69 .-r V4 cn 69 69 69 69 6•i 69 N ,. O O O O %0 O O O O O O M kn O o 0 0 r a y O 0 O C O 0 O 64 O O O N wl 6i to 69 W) 69 (` 69 N di 00 6q 0 O 0 O 0 O 0¢ O U o to O to v� O" O� vi O a 6M9 6q tn G9 69 VI) fin 69 K a � � a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (� O� O O 0^ O o o t% v? o0 N O O o 0 V E 00 M_ O en N v'i O qt 00 qt 't t- to v1 .--� t- O .0., �D fA 69 l� 6% 6'i 69 69 69 69 M 69 O �o M M 64 I",4n 64 69 N" 6, 69 �O 01 CQ L �•-� 69 69 69 O V h 00 G O^ O O— O O 69 69 69 69 6R 69 ID. o C C F U 00 M O 6) N rn V O G 6s � CA40% 6N9 C W a a O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (� O O O O O O O lO O O o vw 0 O v1 0o O O O O O C o C 0 C 0 C ON vi kn N v1 M t- 00 00 v M O v � v1 to 00 "G 69 vn 69 69 69 M 69 M 69 d' 69 --� .-. 00 N 69 69 69 N 69 N 69 l� d .-i 69 69 69 O O Cl O 110 O O D\ l- O M N 0 0 0 0 r a o C C C O to 69 rn 69 V 69 �O 69 69 N 69 O O O O O O O O Q F U vl to N M 64 M 6q �O V1 64 tr 00 O f 69 6�9 yq 6Ns 6 F" a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 O 0 G 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 C 0 O 0 O 0 C 0 C 0 O 0 G 0 O 0 C 0 O O O E-. O O O O O O O W) o O 0 O 0 O cn t O O O O O 00 O O O O O O O O O O v1 O O l� 60 O �O M V1 O v> h l� V1 O 00 m O_ O N 69 69 M 69 di 69 69 of 69 69 vl 69 .-. .-+ O M fA 69 69 N N 69 M 69 l- Q 69 69 69 0 U W, CD O o m 0 0 0 v1 O to O vi O o 0 0 «a C7 rn O O O 69 O O N W)%10 wn N 0 0 0 Cl O O O O o C 69 69 69 69 M 69 O O O O H a � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;; a o 0 O 0 o 0 C 0 oo 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 oo 0 O 0 o 0 o 0 O 0 O 0 t%'l E. t` to vi O M ID N O oo er et .-, O v i '-T O "O M N 69 69 N 69 69 69 64 69 69 to 69 1.0 to 69 M 69 N 69 " 69 IO bH N = w6n H m C 0 0 0 O N 69 69 69 f 6% W +U,. M6s 6N9 614 609 69 6M4 N 69 64 6644 O to - o o -- In o Ow� 0 0 O 0 o 0 o 0— 0 CY �O N O N O o0 •-+ oo N 10 y N a, 04 c a O 8 8 C' CL o N � o o 3 c • � '> c 7w 20 ° w v n too a o2 u O •g tU 3 F U E EF .S V f 4 P. � M C �., yy� eo vy[� c0 a C C4 t c0 .a y.-0 N M 'IT to %0 t- 00 Q1 � � N M � � 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O [� N N O O O h O O O O N n E N 69 64 69 69 n � vt W) H O 00 N 69 0 h 0 O 0¢ O ice^ U M 69 vi 6s 6s6q Q a F � a to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o E- v, 0` o v_ 0 o 0 v o o v, t` � - 69 � 6i9 � 69 66s 69 O qt Cl U Ze 6�,6040 E CG a a O O O O O O aI O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O C �O kn Iq O O C� O n O N v1 �n cV oo to h t- Ol w 69 69 69 69 fA N 69 N p U 6M9 69 ON to 69 69 t- 64 O F G a � a O O O o 0 0 eef000000 a3 O O O O O O �W) N (D N O O O O O O W) rt 69 69 69 69 69 6en 4 O ^ O O O 0 O O O U 661 69 M 69 t` 6s 0; 69 F¢„ O a a a O O O O O O .� 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 o 0 O 0 O o O o 0 0 Q\ 69 6A di O 69 69 kn v1 69 .+ � O O O ¢ _� O O O U o O e 00 C _ y Vl w w t�, fn fn cn 3 o � 3 O ^O" O ^ O '_ O Ca ua 0 E G U x y V [ y cd a k � E O t- 00 0� O o z N N o W) to E t� 00 to N t- 69 00 t- +O. 69 69 M M %nr4 00 a O 6A u O o o c ,c O kn Co to %0 (-� N 00 o N O M 4n t) ul 69 V7 V7 69 69 O 69 kn 00 .a O F" U 0 c cs� a a O O O O O O O O C O kn O vt O, k 00 M 00 E 'D N O' a M 69 M N w6q 61 � -- M ri O (¢. U_ O C � a O O O o 0 0 0 0 r O O O O Fv) O v1 vt 00 V1 M o0 �D N ON ON -- 69 U644 69 F. O c � a a O O O o 0 0 0 0 M QO N O� V1 69 6O 6M a0,+ 69 9 ON U Q a � to .a H z 9 v TTACHMENT 1 007 o W) to E t� 00 to N t- 69 00 t- +O. 69 69 M M %nr4 00 a O 6A u O o o c ,c O kn Co to %0 (-� N 00 o N O M 4n t) ul 69 V7 V7 69 69 O 69 kn 00 .a O F" U 0 c cs� a a O O O O O O O O C O kn O vt O, k 00 M 00 E 'D N O' a M 69 M N w6q 61 � -- M ri O (¢. U_ O C � a O O O o 0 0 0 0 r O O O O Fv) O v1 vt 00 V1 M o0 �D N ON ON -- 69 U644 69 F. O c � a a O O O o 0 0 0 0 M QO N O� V1 69 6O 6M a0,+ 69 9 ON U Q a � to .a H z 9 v TTACHMENT 1 007 T a 0 4bf 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL,/RDA MEETING DATE: March 19, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Approval of Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate for the Fritz Burns Park Court Lighting Improvements, Project No. 2000-15 BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: / STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) and authorize staff to advertise for bid the Fritz Burns Park Court Lighting Improvements, Project No. 2000-15. This project is currently identified within the City's approved Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2001 /2002. The following is a budget summary: Amount Budgeted - RDA Project Area 1 $300,000 Amount spent through 02/28/02 $13,128 Amount Available $286,872 Engineer's Estimate $68,798 Construction - Contingency $7,447 Testing and Inspection $5,676 Administration $4,096 Total Amount Estimated for Lighting Improvements $86,017 Amount Available for completion of Project No. 2000-15 $200,855 Since RDA Funding is being utilized for this project, the City will bid the project with prevailing wage requirements. Therefore, there are no Charter City implications. On January 19, 1999, the City Council approved the PS&E, and authorized staff to advertise the Fritz Burns Park/Bear Creek Bike Path Rest Stops Improvements for bid. T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020319b. Wpd The Fritz Burns Park improvements included the restoration (removal and replacement) of rubber matting at the water feature; recreational level lighting for four unlit courts (2 tennis and 2 roller hockey); replacement of damaged court fencing; and removal and replacement of wind screen fabric for tennis courts. The project also included the installation of shade structures, bike racks, benches, drinking fountains, and trash receptacles at four separate locations (approximately 1 mile apart) along the Bear Creek Bike Path. The project was originally bid with the following two add alternates: Add Alternate 1) Installation of roller hockey dasher boards for the two southern courts; and, Add Alternate 2) Installation of additional playground equipment, (2) sets of swings and a tot age group slide. On April 15, 1999, one bid was submitted by Ground Zero Demolition Company of Cathedral City, California, in the amount of $228,209. This bid was substantially more than estimated. On April 20, 1999, the City Council rejected the Ground Zero Demolition Co. bid and authorized staff to restructure the project into smaller scopes of work. The work was divided by discipline. Staff sought proposals for electrical work exclusively from electrical contractors, and proposals for fencing and wind screen from fencing contractors. On April 18, 2000, the City Council approved the project PS&E for the Fritz Burns Park Fence Rehabilitation Improvements, Project No. 98-16; and authorized staff to advertise the Fritz Burns Park Fence Rehabilitation Improvement project for bids. During this meeting, staff informed the City Council that additional revenue would be required to complete the project. On July 10, 2000, the City received one bid from Quality Fence Company, Inc. to construct the Fritz Burns Park Fence Rehabilitation Improvements, Project No. 98-16. On August 1, 2000, City Council appropriated an additional $51,585.38 from RDA Project Area No. 1 funds toward the Fritz Burns Park Fence Rehabilitation Improvements, approved the revised project budget, and awarded a contract in the amount of $93,316.40 to Quality Fence Company, Inc. to construct Project No. 98-16, Fritz Burns Park Fence Rehabilitation Improvements. The project was constructed and on June 19, 2001, the City Council formally acted to accept Project No. 98-16 Fritz Burns Park Fence Rehabilitation Improvements as 100% complete; authorized the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and authorized staff to release retention in the amount of $8,429.64, 35 days after the Notice of Completion was recorded. The remaining budget for this project was $167,655. In Fiscal year 2001 /2002, an additional $132,345 was allocated to Phase II of the Fritz Burns Park Improvements, providing a project total of $300,000. As of this date, $13,128 has been spent from this project account on 0 9' various design costs, leaving a balance of $286,872. T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020319b.wpd '. 002 The Phase II Fritz Burns Park Improvements define the project as restoration of the lighting system for the four southern courts, installation of dasher boards for roller hockey and conversion of one court to a basketball court. The next phase of the improvements will be court lighting improvements. The PS&E is now complete and available for review within the Public Works Department. The remaining components of the Phase II Improvements will be bid after the lighting improvements are complete. The Engineer's Estimate for the restoration of the lighting system is $86,017, leaving .a balance of $200,855. Assuming authorization to advertise for bids, the following represents how the project is expected to proceed: Approval of PS&E/Authorization to Receive Bids Bid Period Approval to Award Construction Construction Period (60 days) Accept Improvements March 19, 2002 March 20, 2002 - April 11, 2002 April 16, 2002 April 26, 2002 - June 26, 2002 July 2002 The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) and authorize staff to advertise for bid the Fritz Burns Park Court Lighting Improvements, Project No. 2000-15; or 2. Do not approve the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) and do not authorize staff to advertise for bid the Fritz Burns Park Court Lighting Improvements, Project No. 2000-15; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. T:\PW DEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020319b. wpd Respectfully submitted, 4t�)-f yF. Stephenson, P.E. erim Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020319b.wpd !1' COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: ITEM TITLE: March 19, 2002 Approval of a Contract Services Agreement for Redevelopment, Housing, and Economic Development with Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: O STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract services agreement with the Rosenow Spevacek Group (RSG) for redevelopment, housing, and economic development services. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Adequate funds have been budgeted in Redevelopment Agency Project Area No. 1 (405-902-603-000) and in Redevelopment Agency Project Area No. 2 (406-905- 603-000) for Fiscal Year 2001-2002, and will continue to be budgeted from these accounts in subsequent fiscal years. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The City Council authorized the City Manager to enter into negotiations with RSG for an extension to their existing contract services agreement at the February 5, 2002 City Council meeting. Pursuant to that authorization, staff has met with representatives of RSG, reviewed the existing contract, and discussed an extension to the contract terms. The attached Contract Services Agreement (Attachment 1) represents the results of the negotiations. Exhibit A of the draft Contract Services Agreement lists the scope of services to be provided by RSG. The contract term is for five (5) years. The fee schedule is included in the draft agreement as Exhibit B; services will be billed on a time -and - materials basis. It should be noted that the hourly rate for the Principal/Director will 094 be $135 for the first two years of the contract term, and will increase to $150 for the final three years of the contract term. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract services agreement with the Rosenow Spevacek Group (RSG) for redevelopment, housing, and economic development services; or 2. Do not authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract services agreement with the Rosenow Spevacek Group (RSG) for redevelopment, housing, and economic development services; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Contract Services Agreement 0Ijj 002 CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (the "Agreement"), is made and entered into by and among the CITY OF LA QUINTA (the "Municipality"), a California municipal corporation, the LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (the "Agency"), a California public corporation, and ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. (The "Contractor"). The parties hereto agree as follows: 1. SERVICES OF CONTRACTOR 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of the Agreement, the Contractor shall provide those services related to Redevelopment, Housing, and Economic Development, as specified in the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference (the "services" or "work"). Contractor warrants that all services will be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner in accordance with the standards prevalent in the industry for such services. Services will be provided to the Municipality and to the Agency. For convenience, the Agency and the Municipality are referred to herein as the "City." 1.2 Contractor's Proposal. The Scope of Services shall include the Contractor's proposal or bid, which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. 1.3 Compliance with Law. All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, regulations and laws of the Municipality, the Agency, and any and all Federal, State or local governmental agency of competent jurisdiction. 1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees, and Assessments. Contractor shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Contractor shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. 1.5 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Contractor warrants that (a) it has thoroughly investigated and considered the work to be performed, (b) it has investigated the site of the work and fully acquainted itself with the conditions there existing, (c) it has carefully considered how the work should be performed, and (d) it fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the work under this Agreement. Should the Contractor discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the work or as represented by the City, it shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Contractor's risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer (as defined in Section 4.2 hereof). 00 v �1 004 1.6 Care of Work. The Contractor shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers and other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to person, or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City's own negligence. The performance of services by Contractor shall not relieve Contractor from any obligation to correct any incomplete, inaccurate or defective work at no further cost to the City, when such inaccuracies are due to the negligence of Contractor. 1.7 Additional Services. In accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Contractor shall perform services in addition to those specified in the Scope of Services, (Exhibit "A") when directed in writing to do so by the Contract Officer, provided that Contractor shall not be required to perform any additional services without compensation. 2.0 COMPENSATION 2.1 Contract Sum. For the services rendered pursuant to the Agreement, the Contractor shall be compensated in accordance with the "Schedule of Compensation" attached hereto as Exhibit `B" and incorporated herein by this reference. The method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation will include payment for time and materials based upon the Contractor's rates as specified in Exhibit "B", or such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation (Exhibit `B"). Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, transportation expenses, telephone expense, premiums for bonds and insurance, and similar costs and expenses when and if specified in the Schedule of Compensation (Exhibit "B"). 2.2 Method of Payment. Any month in which Contractor wishes to receive payment, Contractor shall submit to the City no later than the tenth (1 o`") working day of such month, in the form approved by the Contract Officer, an invoice for services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. Such invoice shall (1) describe in detail the services provided, including time and materials, (2) specify each staff member who has provided services and the number of hours assigned to each such staff member, and (3) indicate the total expenditures to date. Such invoice shall contain a certification by a principal member of Contractor specifying that the payment requested is for work performed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The Municipality or the Agency, whichever is appropriate based upon the election of the Agency and the Municipality, will pay Contractor for all expenses stated thereon which are approved by the Municipality or the Agency pursuant to this Agreement no later that the last working day of the month. 3.0 PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. 0 Qj i 00 3.2 Schedule of Performance. All services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed diligently and within the performance of this Agreement. 3.3. Force Majeure. All time periods specified for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemic, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargos, acts of any governmental agency other than City, and unusually severe weather, if the Contractor shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contracting Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contracting Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay and extend the time for performing their services for the period of the forced delay when and if in his judgment such delay is justified, and the Contracting Officer's determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Section 7.8 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect for five (5) years, from the date of the execution of this Agreement. 4.0 COORDINATION OF WORK 4.1 Representative of Contractor. The following principals of Contractor are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Contractor authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: a. Frank Spevacek b. Kathleen Rosenow It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of the Agreement for directing all activities of Contractor and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. The foregoing principals may not be changed by Contractor and no other personnel may be assigned to perform the service required hereunder without the express written approval of City. 4.2 Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be the Assistant City Manager or such other person as may be designated by the City Manager of the Municipality. The Contract Officer has been authorized to act on behalf of the Agency and the Municipality for the purposes of this Agreement. It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Contractor shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. 4.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Contractor, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Contractor shall not contract with a 913 Of)F any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be assigned or transferred, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of City. 4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Contractor, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth. Contractor shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. 4.5 City Cooperation. The City shall provide Contractor with any plans, publications, reports, statistics, records or other data or information pertinent to services to be performed hereunder which are reasonably available to the City. 5.0 INSURANCE INDEMNIFICATION AND BONDS. 5.1 Insurance. The Contractor shall procure and maintain, at its cost, and submit concurrently with its execution of the Agreement, public liability and property damage insurance against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property resulting from Contractor's acts or omissions rising out of or related to Contractor's performance under this Agreement. The insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that the coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Contractor's performance hereunder and neither the City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to any such loss. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming the City and its officers and employees as additional insured shall be delivered to and approved by the City prior to commencement of the services hereunder. The amount of insurance required hereunder shall be determined by the Contract Sum in accordance with the following table: Contract Sum Coverage(personal injury/property damage) Less than $50,000 $100,000 per individual; $300,000 per occurrence $50,0004300,000 $250,000 per individual; $500,000 per occurrence Over $300,000 $500,000 per individual; $1,000,000 per occurrence The Contractor shall also carry automobile liability insurance of $1,000,000 per accident against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property arising out of the use of any automobile by the Contractor, its officers, any directly or indirectly employed by the Contractor, any subcontractor, and agents or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, arising directly or indirectly out of or related to Contractor's performance under this Agreement. The term "automobile" includes, but is not limited to, a land motor vehicle, trailer or semi -trailer designed for travel on public roads. The automobile insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Contractor's performance hereunder and neither the City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to such loss. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming the City and its officers and employees as additional insured shall be delivered to and approved by the City prior to commencement of the services 0 913 0n7 hereunder. Contractor shall also carry Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with State Workers' Compensation laws. The Contractor shall procure professional errors and omissions liability insurance in the amount acceptable to the City. All insurance required by the Section shall be kept in effect during the term of this Agreement and shall not be cancelable without thirty (30) days' written notice of proposed cancellation to City. The procuring of such insurance or the delivery of policies or certificates evidencing the same shall not be construed as a limitation of Contractor's obligation to indemnify the City, its officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors or agents. 5.2 Indemnification. The Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees, representatives and agents, from and against any and all actions, suits, proceedings, claims, demands, losses, costs, and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys' fees, for injury to or death of person(s), for damage to property (including property owned by the City) and for errors and omissions committed by Contractor, its officers, anyone directly or indirectly employed by Contractor, any subcontractor, and agents or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, arising directly or indirectly out of or related to Contractor's performance under this Agreement, except to the extent of such loss as may be caused by City's own active negligence, sole negligence or willful misconduct, or that of its officers or employees. 5.3 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies the City may have if Contractor fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City, at its sole option: a. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement. b. Order the Contractor to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payments(s) which become due to Contractor hereunder until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. C. Terminate the Agreement. Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to any other remedies the City may have and are not the exclusive remedies for Contractor's failure to maintain or secure appropriate policies or endorsements. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor may be held responsible for payments of damages to person or property resulting from Contractor's or its subcontractors' performance of work under this Agreement. 0(,'8 6.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS 6.1 Reports. Contractor shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. 6.2 Records. Contractor shall keep such books and records as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the cost and the performance of such services. Books and records pertaining to costs shall be kept and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all reasonable times, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. 6.3 Ownership of Documents. Originals of all drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents, and other materials, whether in hard copy or electronic form, which are prepared by Contractor, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement, shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon the termination of this Agreement or upon the earlier request of the Contract Officer, and Contractor shall have not claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership of the documents and materials hereunder. Contractor may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Contractor shall ensure all subcontractors to assign City any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Contractor fails to secure such assignment, Contractor shall indemnify City for all damages suffered thereby. 6.4 Release of Documents. The drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials prepared by Contractor in the performance of services under this Agreement shall not be released publicly without the prior written approval of the Contract Officer or as required by law. Contractor shall not disclose to any other private entity or person any information regarding the activities of the City, except as required by law or as authorized by the City. 7.0 ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT 7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Contractor covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. 7.2 Disputes. In the event of any dispute arising under this Agreement, the injured party shall notify the injuring party in writing of its contentions by submitting a claim therefor. The injured party shall continue performing its obligation hereunder so long as the injuring party commences to cure such default within ten (10) days of service of such notice and completes the cure of such default within forty-five (45) days after service of the notice, or such longer period as may be permitted by the Contract Officer; provided that if the default is an immediate danger to A Ong the health, safety and general welfare, the City may take such immediate action as the City deems warranted. Compliance with the provisions of this Section shall be a condition precedent to termination of the Agreement for cause and to any legal action, and such compliance shall not be a waiver of any parry's right to take legal action in the event that the dispute is not cured, provided that nothing herein shall limit City's right to terminate this Agreement without cause pursuant to Section 7.8. 7.3 Retention of Funds. City may withhold from any monies payable to Contractor sufficient funds to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities or damages it reasonably believes were suffered by City due to the default of Contractor in the performance of the services required by the Agreement. 7.4 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a nondefaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. City's consent or approval of any act by Contractor requiring City's consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary City's consent to or approval of any subsequent act of Contractor. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 7.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, at law or at equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. 7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Agreement, except as specifically provided in the following Section 7.9 for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Contractor. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Contractor shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Contractor shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to receipt of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation (Exhibit "B") or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. 7.8 Termination for Default of Contractor. If termination is due to the failure of the Contractor to fulfill its obligation under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provision of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Contractor shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the 010 Contractor for the purpose of setoff or partial payment of the amounts owned the City as previously stated in Section 7.3. 7.9 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party arising out of or in connections with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit from the losing party. 8.0 CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION 8.1 Non -liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Contractor, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City of for any amount which may become due to the Contractor or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of the Agreement. 8.2 Conflict of Interest. No officer or employee of the City shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which effects his personal interest or the interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. The Contractor warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement. 8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination. Contractor covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, disability or ancestry in the performance of the Agreement. Contractor shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, age or ancestry. 9.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9.1 Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, communication either party desires or is required to give to the other parties or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail to the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty-eight (48) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section 9.1. To Municipality: CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Attention: Mark Weiss Assistant City Manager To Agency: La Quinta Redevelopment Agency 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Attention: Mark Weiss Assistant Executive Director 1 0 j O11 To Contractor: ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. 540 N. Golden Circle, Suite 305 Santa Ana, California 92705-3914 Attention: Frank Spevacek 9.2 Integrated Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the parties and all previous understandings, negotiations and agreements are integrated into and superseded by this Agreement. 9.3 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the parties by an instrument in writing signed by all parties. 9.4 Severability. In the event that any or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in the Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceable shall not effect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder. 9.5 Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that by so executing this Agreement the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. stated below. Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation Rv- CITY MANAGER "MUNICIPALITY" 1,014 019 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Dated: ATTEST: Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Agency Counsel Dated: By: Name: Title: LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR "Agency" "CONTRACTOR" 1 () j 013 7 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES Pursuant to the Contractor's proposal dated January 17, 2002, the Contractor shall provide planning, management, and financial services for the following activities: • Redevelopment advisory services. • Real estate analysis. • Structuring and implementing the Agency's affordable housing strategy. • Qualifying affordable housing occupants. • Bond fiscal consultant services.. • Preparing and implementing the City/Agency's economic development strategy. • Preparing the Agency's annual financial and housing reports. • Preparing the Agency's annual financial management plan. • Participating in the annual City/Agency cash flow analysis. • Property acquisition services, as necessary. • Initiate annual tenant and homeowner monitoring. The Contractor shall complete all necessary tasks (within the portfolio of their services) to undertake these activities. All work tasks shall be assigned by the Contract Officer. 014 EXHIBIT B SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION For the five (5) year term of the Agreement, the Contractor shall invoice the City for services rendered on a time -and -materials basis pursuant to the fee schedule and billing policies outlined below; all services rendered shall be with Exhibit A, Scope of Services, of the Agreement, and will be subject to prior approval or assignment by the Agency Executive Director or his designee. Fee Schedule. The following Fee Schedule shall be in effect for the first two (2) years of the Agreement: Principal/Director $13 5 Senior Associate $125 Associate/Acquisition $100 Agent Senior Analyst $ 85 Analyst $ 75 Research Assistant/ $ 65 Real Estate Technician Word Processor $ 45 Clerical $ 35 The following Fee Schedule shall be in effect for the last three (3) years of the Agreement: Principal/Director $150 Senior Associate $125 Associate/Acquisition $100 Agent Senior Analyst $ 85 Analyst $ 75 Research Assistant/ $ 65 Real Estate Technician Word Processor $ 45 Clerical $ 35 Reimbursement for Out -of -Pocket Exn n s. The Contractor shall not charge for mileage, parking, telephone/fax expense, nor copies/postage involving five (5) or less documents/pieces. The Contractor shall, however, be reimbursed for additional insured certificates, messenger services, Express Mail/Federal Express costs, and copies/postage involving six (6) or more documents/pieces. The Contractor shall also be reimbursed for extraordinary out-of-pocket expenses, such as air fare, meals, and lodging expenses associated with travel required for client projects (for example, bond rating agency/insurance company presentations). These costs are charged at actual expense with no 1 �i surcharge and are incurred only with prior client authorization. COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 19, 2002 Authorization for Overnight Travel for a Code Compliance Officer to Attend Training Classes Given by Southern California Association of Code Enforcement Officials, Inc., in Anaheim, CA, April 25 through 27, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 9 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve authorization for overnight travel for a Code Compliance Officer to attend training classes given by Southern California Association of Code Enforcement Officials, Inc., in Anaheim, CA, April 25 through 27, 2002. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The training will be funded from Travel, Training and Meetings Account #101-352- 637-000. The breakdown of estimated expenditures for this class is as follows: ♦ Registration $120 ♦ Meals 50 ♦ Travel 25 ♦ Hotel 200 Total $395 CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: This course will improve the skills and abilities of the Code Compliance Officer in the performance of her duties and ensure that our Code Compliance Department is operating within all legal requirements. Please see the attached pages for course title (Attachment 1) . 1000 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve authorization for overnight travel for a Code Compliance Officer to attend training classes given by Southern California Association of Code Enforcement Officials, Inc., in Anaheim, CA, April 25 through 27, 2002; or 2. Do not approve the request for overnight travel; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Tom Hartung, Building and Safety Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Announcement showing class subjects 0 V 01'2r ATTACHMEW 1 S.C.A.C.E.O. PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION CLASSES FRIDAY, APRIL 26, 2002 SATURDAY, APRIL 27, 2002 Intermediate 201 — Substandard Residences Intermediate 202 — Legal Aspects — Warrant Process Supervisory 402 — Personnel Management Supervisory 403 — Administrative -Budget Management "Instructors to be announced" SCHEDULE OF EVENTS 7:00 — 8:00 Registration & Continental Breakfast 8:00 — 12:00 Professional Certification Program 12:00 — 1:00 Hosted Lunch 1:00 — 5:00 Professional Certification Program No College Credit for Arrivals After 9:00 a.m. TRAINING LOCATION Quality Hotel Maingate — Anaheim 616 W. Convention Way Anaheim, CA 92802 Reservations: (714)750-3131 or (800)231-6215 Mention S. C.A. C. E. O. for discount room rates. ,M9. y-) single or double jbr rooms reserved prior to 03126102 Registration Form NOTE: You are encouraged to reister as early as , possible. Registration fees include admission to the training, lunch and parking. Registration Fees: embers $60 per class. ONon-Members $90 per class Name �J ACK l k'� M l URi) CA Jurisdiction _ C i Ty 0 f Z A Q/ ik/ TA Address J 0. 20 City 0 0 l ji% / A State 4 Zip Telephone 6FAX O 7" �% E-mail q)as3 April 26, 2002 A 201 Substandard Residences 0#402 Personnel Management April 27, 2002 202 Legal Aspects -Warrant Process Q4403 Administrative — Budget Management Please make c ecks payable to S.C.A.C.E.O.. and send with this registration form to: S.C.A.C.E.O. P.O. Box 110, Anaheim, CA 92815-0110 To register by telephone or fax please contact Charles Carter Office(909)384-5205 ext. 5379 Fax (909)384-5247 ^ ^ ao 0 rD rD Z cr 0 OK � cn � rD 'i7 cn 0 y 0 C3. w w C. w Uo ?; y a G rD G -- p^ CL a 21 ro o< 5. .� : w o o" CL 0. O < n p_ �- ^ �' o o` w O 0- �, pr vs p ►t) w CL rb o' Q" o rD w o .G °o°- n `� o' o x a G A' 0 CD w x -10 .,' H ti G "0 n � n G rD Q. O 'l7 '' ll CL o w .o o <. ^ o a: � w o =; ( a. o" _� �' c` o � w 0. H ° � . o � `-4 o -, Uq '' O G � p ro ^ ro • - rD r., rD 0 w 'Zt 0..0 r, O ,, p p� w 0 CD rD °' O G "' O O�11 O 0 O t7 t~D rD 7 ryD O rD r^D O p - ° 0 y `' 0 GL. � n O O `.3 w w � Gi 0 CL crQ 0. r' p ] �; O o✓ a' p o •0 0 ^ �y UG rD n 0 0. „ rp ro 0 y' p� p ro rb A) fD :P. ua a ° o' 'o Q' w rD -r, �° ^ 0 o r°o" w y ^ r� �- O y 0' O' ., ., rp <' �' �' w 'v ro O G p, �. ., w �, "V (A � 0 ]. rb p - ^ p_ CL Q' v0i w a n a- y p_ G • G rw" D CL 0. < .0 ,C O 'II O Q. ° O w ~ y rD � r<D ° a. rb 0. 0. (' < ° 0. (' p ^v a O � CL CL .oh -1 o " Z � G1. p- w �' a rnD � ri � w � O p �' G UQ � p � • n o w p V7 rb rb O ara 0- cn rp ►, r-L Z I < n _"' p '' `C7 , * w "n p> PT, "r) vv'i ° O y O pr••r' .7 r^-r rD In y '.•� rr• O rn 0- '7 rD "U • 5 • O ^ 7 f W b -p* p' n ' O n ] w y r° � O w N ] ° Q' CD ro �' O O y �- y' 'p0 0' y p ^ CL n iT1 0 n 0 x "..S' y ' is. w y. .�' ti n CD O ,.•� O rD n r-h C].. Cl �., r0 0 w ° `w O O 7 '� Q •T }��! 141) rD ~ (]. G `J' ° 0 > 0 Q. , V) C Gn r~t H ►.. rt n ° rat Q �! w O. r•f O x 7� y rbo O p rn O 0. ^ Co '� ^ w rb `C 0 0 O G O ^O "' 4. O w e y Q- �' o a. Cri p, 0.0 'Z7 ° O O v o o x �' Q- y �. cr' � o' Cs. ^ "' a. r� A... m 0. "a o 0 C F w C L G 0' ro O ° p rD ry •, r` rD v, w o �- 0. =� ��„ n 0rb '-j r, G^ .o' 0 w G ro' r�D 0 0� w p y r' y a o. O 0- 0 .' O 0 O] pi 0 0 P� a- G 0- W AD w y G- O ^O Oq *� cn` rD O y '� A" �' N Cl O y n Urb �' O ~G f p Q O-r =y rD rn Uq rD �• n ' ,� N < O Up r r O a �. ti �' ti w y r^D ryD °O L1- N GL .-n a- v, Cro w- w' rl' :�- rD C-6 in- r-t d COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 19, 2002 Authorization for Overnight Travel for the Historic Preservation Commission and Principal Planner to Attend the 2002 California Preservation Conference to be Held in Santa Rosa, California, May 2-5, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: /0 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Historic Preservation Commission and Principal Planner to attend the 2002 California Preservation Conference to be held in Santa Rosa, California, May 2-5, 2002. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The approved Fiscal Year 2001 /2002 Budget allocates $6,000 for the Historic Preservation Commission and Community Development Department staff to attend conferences. Attendance at this conference is estimated to be $835 per person based on the following costs: Registration $150 Workshops $ 60 Travel $178 Hotel $436 Meals 300 TOTAL $1,124 X 5 = $ 5, 620 These funds are budgeted in the Travel and Meetings Account for the Community Development Department (101-401-637-000 and 101 -402-637-000). CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Funds have been budgeted for Commissioners and staff to attend conferences in years past. In order to maintain our Certified Local Government status, Commissioners and staff are required to obtain continuing education credits. Historic Preservation G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\ccjh-trave1HPC.wpd ri Commissioners Robert Wright, Barbara Irwin, Archie Sharp, Maria Puente along with Principal Planner Stan Sawa plan to attend. Information regarding the conference is contained in Attachment 1. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Historic Preservation Commission and Principal Planner to attend the 2002 California Preservation Conference to be held in Santa Rosa, California, May 2-5, 2002; or 2. Do not approve the request for overnight travel for the Historic. Preservation Commission and Principal Planner to attend the 2002 California Preservation Conference to be held in Santa Rosa, California, May 2-5, 2002; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Hermdn' munity Development Director Approved for submission by: �l Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1 . California Preservation Conference 2002 Information 1.1,E 002 G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\ccjh-trave1HPC.wpd ATTACHMENT #1 ersfeo�6y Galf�r 'a ✓ �fion . afion - G'ily �sanfa jasa - Galr ima ofioe o�lMdcnc J1 weroahon - Uo� V c woma ."V,,..,,', ...'. Gar orrlra — PRESERVATION The :,. �✓V.w. CONFEREN E California Preservation Foundation, City of Santa Rosa, California Office of Historic Preservation 7%;„�uyc� c5�„u�»a iinun/y and the Sonoma County Landmarks Commission } • .,..- invite you to attend the ... 0"� 27Z nnual t a6.t�arnia 5reseroalion Con erence ... in'Uinfaye c5onoma lJounfy. " The Conference's Educational Sessions and Mobile Workshops will focus on four program tracks: Cultural Landscapes, Technology Toolkit, Engaging Change — The Development Process for Preservation, and California Issues plus a Special Introduction to Sonoma County by historian Gaye LeBaron ONE OF THE COUNTRY'S LEADING proponents of historic and cultural landscapes preservation and the Coordinator of the National Park Service's Historic Landscape Initiative Charles Birnbaum, FASLA, will be 9&. eynofe c )oea her at the Conference's Plenary Session Friday morning. Birnbaum's address will look at preservation and design of urban spaces over the past several decades and will suggest what we can do, when design is often driven by economics, to reverse the trends that result in a false sense of history, or in either standardized, or pastiche environments. 3 e ,71aminyo 57esorf Xofel CONFERENCE HEADQUARTERS will be the Flamingo Resort Hotel in Santa Rosa, with its Historic Landmark revolving -neon flamingo tower. The Hotel will house the Educational Sessions, Registration Area, Bookstore, Exhibits, and Silent Auction. Registration opens at 8:00 a.m. on Thursday, May 2. Just one hour north of the Golden Gate Bridge, the Flamingo Resort Hotel is located at 2777 Fourth Street, just 5 minutes from downtown Santa Rosa and centrally located for all the Conference venues. Phone (800) 848-8300, www.flamingoresort.com (See back cover for Lodging Information) Welcome .% Vinfaye c5oncma Counly SONOMA COUNTY is a region of spectacular natural beauty, dramatic coastlines, picturesque historic towns, and fine vineyards and agricultural landscapes. Northern Sonoma includes the towns of Cloverdale, Geyserville, Healdsburg, and Windsor, and the fine wine producing regions of the Alexander Valley and the Dry Creek Valley. The Sonoma Valley to the east, also known as the "Valley of the Moon," contains dozens of wineries in the charming towns of Kenwood, Glen Ellen, and Sonoma. It's also home to Jack London State Park, General Vallejo's home, and the Sonoma Mission and Historic Plaza. To the south is the historic town of Petaluma with iron -front buildings that line the riverfront. The Russian River region to the west includes the towns of Guerneville, Sebastopol, Occidental, and Freestone. And who can forget the town of Bodega from the Hitchcock film, "The Birds"? www.sonomacounty.com SANTA ROSA, with its tree -lined streets and historic neighborhoods, is the center of the County and the gateway to Sonoma Wine Country. The City is the proud owner and caretaker of many historic sites including the National Historic Landmark Luther Burbank Home & Gardens, the DeTurk Round Barn, and the Church of One Tree. The Historic Railroad Square District, listed in the National Register in 1979, boasts 12 award -winning restaurants and coffee houses and many beautiful antique shops. Famous citizens who called Santa Rosa and Sonoma County home include Luther Burbank, Jack London, Robert Ripley, and Charles Schulz. www.visitsantarosa.com Book Your Lodging Now! Hotel Conference rates guaranteed and room block held only through April 2 — See Back Cover For additional Conference information Phone CPF at (510) 763-0972 1 Educational Sessions descriptions available at www.califomiaprescrvation.org 1 Bmchxx Dwp by ARROYOSTYLE Califon is 004 At- - Conference at a Glance 2Ai rrday, My 2 .` ,hrday, Jay 3 c5a&rvlay, Jay 4 c3unolay, Jay S 8:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. Registration Open 9:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Historic Landscapes Preservation — CPF Workshop (T) 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. State Historic Resources Commission Quarterly Meeting 12 noon - 6:00 p.m. Bookstore, Silent Auction, Exhibit Booths Open 1:00 p.m. - 2-00 p.m. State Historical Building Safety Board Quarterly Meeting 2:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. State Historical Building Code Legal/Statutory Workshop 1:00 p.m. - 5.00 p.m. Old Petaluma Tour — Adobes to Iron Tour M 1:00 p.m. - 5:W p.m. Historic Healdsburg Tour (T) 1:00 p.m. - 5-00 p.m. Santa Rosa Historic Districts Tour (T) 1:00 P.M. - 5-00 P.M. Wine in the Redwoods, West Sonoma County Tour (T) 1:00 p.m. - 5.:00 p.m. Historic Sonoma Tour (T) 6:00 p.m. - 8:30 p.m. Opening Reception at the Luther Burbank Home & Gardens (T) 8:30 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. Lamplight Historic Cemetery Tour (T) 9:00 P.M. - 10:00 P.M. Video showing of "Connections: Preserving America's Landscape Legacy" 6:30 a.m. - 7:30 a.m. Landmarks on the Run 7:15 a.m. - 8:30 a.m. Main Street Breakfast (T) 8:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. Registration, Bookstore, Silent Auction, Exhibit Booths Open 9:00 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. Conference Plenary Session 12:15 p.m. - 1:45 p.m. International Preservation Lunch (T) 2:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. "The Doctor is In" — Preservation Assistance (5a!) 2:00 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. Engaging Change Mobile Workshop — Development on the Move (T) 2:00 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. California Issues Mobile Workshop — CHRIS (T) 2:00 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. Educational Sessions: Cultural Landscapes — What's in a Name? 2:00 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. Technical Toolkit — GIS in Practice 3:45 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. Cultural Landscapes —Agricultural Issues 3:45 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. Technical Toolkit — Retaining Historic Fabric 6:00 p.m. - 7:30 p.m. President's Circle Reception (By Invitation) 8:00 p.m. - 10-30 p.m. Three -Minute Success Stories (T) 6:30 a.m. - 7:30 a.m. Landmarks on the Run 7:30 a.m. - 8:45 a.m. Legislative Breakfast (T) 8:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. Registration, Bookstore, Silent Auction, Exhibit Booths Open 9:00 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. Educational Sessions: Engaging Change — The Property 9:00 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. California Issues — Disaster Planning I 9:00 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. Technical Toolkit — Living with HazMat 9:00 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. Cultural Landscapes Mobile Workshop —Jack London/Landscape Innovator (T) 10-45 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. Educational Sessions: Engaging Change — The Players 10:45 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. California Issues — Disaster Planning II 10-45 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. Technical Toolkit — Historical Building Code 12:30 p.m. - 1:45 p.m. CPF Annual Membership Meeting & Box Lunch (T for Box Lunch) 2:00 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. Educational Sessions: Engaging Change — The Profits 2:00 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. California Issues — Tourism & Small Town Economics 2:00 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. Cultural Landscapes — Building Consensus 2:00 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. Technical Toolkit Mobile Workshop — Sonoma Plaza (T) 3:45 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. Educational Sessions: Engaging Change — The Process 3:45 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. California Issues — Smart Growth 3:45 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. Cultural Landscapes — Heritage Areas 5:00 p.m. - 6-00 p.m. Silent Auction Closing Reception and Wine Raffle 7:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. Gala Atwood Ranch Dinner, Dance and Live Auction (T) 8:00 a.m. - 12 noon Registration and Bookstore Open 9:00 a.m. - 1:00 P.M. Vintage Transportation. Projects Tour (I) 9:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. Northern Sonoma County Wineries Tour M 9:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. Eastern Sonoma County Historic Wineries Tour (T) 9:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. Sonoma County Goes Hollywood Tour (T) (T) Indicates prepaid ticket required for attendance. Schedule subject to changes 11 �- and/or cancellations.l I J 003 (For CPF Use) Registration # Registration Form � NOTE: Early Bird Registrations mist be received in CPF's office by April 2, 2002. Regular Registrations must be received by April 19. Registrations after April 19 must be made on -site. Cancellation is subject to a $25 fee prior to 5:00 p.m., April 19, 2002. Cancellation from April 19 - April 30 will be charged a $35 fee for Registration only. No refunds will be made after April 30. Refunds for ticketed events will be made only for cancellations received by April 19. Registrants may purchase extra tickets for those events indicated by S. Conference Registration Fee includes Plenary Session and all Educational Sessions erupt Events and Special Programs listed below. One -Day Registrants may only sign up for Events and Special Programs held on that day unless indicated by 0. Events and Special Programs are subject to Sellouts and Cancellations. Each Registrant must use a separate form. CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FEES: CPF Member # (Please provide if possible) ❑ check box if former CPF Trustee Total (Early Bird) By April 2 After April 2 California Preservation Foundation Member $150 175 Non -Member (includes 8-month CPF membership) 190 215 CPF Student Member 100 125 Non -Member Full -Time Student (ID Required, includes 8-month membership) 120 145 One -Day Member Friday Saturday (Circle One) 75 100 One -Day Non -Member Friday Saturday (Circle One) 115 140 AIA/CES Continuing Education Credits 15 15 Package Option (includes Registration, Opening Reception, Gala and 10% discount by April 2 only) CPF Member Package 229.50 N/A Non -Member Package 265.50 N/A EVENTS AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS FEES: # of Items Conference T-Shirt (100% Cotton) S M L XL XXL 15 ea. Thursday, May 2 0 Special Historic Landscapes Workshop CPF Member 90 Non -Member 110 • Old Petaluma Tour — From Adobes to Iron 30 • Historic Healdsburg Tour 30 • Santa Rosa Historic Districts Tour 30 • Historic Sonoma Tour 30 • Wine in the Redwoods West Sonoma County Tour 35 19 Opening Reception at Burbank Gardens 30 • Lamplight Historic Cemetery Tour 25 Friday, May 3 Main Street Breakfast 25 International Preservation Lunch 30 Engaging Change: Preservation on the Move MW 30 California Issues: CHRIS MW 30 • Three -Minute Success Stories 30 Saturday, May 4 Legislative Breakfast 25 Cultural Landscapes: Jack London Park MW 30 Box Lunch for CPF Annual Meeting 16.50 Technical Toolkit: Sonoma Plaza MW 30 • Gala Atwood Ranch Dinner Dance Auction 75 Sunday, May 5 0 Vintage Transportation Projects Tour 35 • Northern Sonoma County Wineries Tour 50 • Eastern Sonoma County Historic Wineries Tour 50 • Sonoma County Goes Hollywood Tour 50 TOTAL AMOUNT ENCLOSED Payment Method: Check # payable to CPF. (Account Name if different than yours) Visa / MC # Cardholder Name Sienature YES, I have Special Needs (Hearing, Vision, Mobility, Dietary, etc.) Please explain: _ FOR BADGE: Name Affiliation Address Phone: Day ( Eve ( City Fax ( Expires _ State: Zip E-mail Mail or FAX form and payment to CPF 2002 Conference, 1611 Telegraph Ave., Suite 820, Oakland, CA 94612 FAX (510) 7634724 110 VC'& Tour Olo'.T'efaluma Four — Jvm,o(o& fo .iron Visit this historic riverfront National Register downtown with some of the finest examples of iron -front buildings in the country, California's largest adobe, General Vallejo's 1830 rancho, "The Old Adobe," and charming and well -maintained Victorian homes. Thursday, May 2,1:00 - 5-00 p.m. (1) ma'sl ric.Tealds6uy `dour Spend the afternoon in Healdsburg, including a visit to the Brainerd Jones -designed Healdsburg Museum and an easy walking tour of historic architecture such as Queen Anne Victorian, Craftsman, and Prairie -style homes. Last stop will be the historic Healdsburg Plaza, which dates from 1857. Includes free time to enjoy local shopping and wine -tasting. Thursday, May 2,1:00 - 5:00 p.m. (1) crania Cosa ma'slaric Disfrich gour Santa Rosa's Preservation Districts, ranging from the neighborhoods of yesterday's social elite to the humble cottages of Italian stonemasons, will be featured in this tour. We will also visit the thriving historic shopping district, Railroad Square. Thursday, May 2,1:00 - 5:00 p.m. (T) Wine in z e jr?eo(mood.r, W esf cSonoma Gounfy lour The trip will include a tour of the historic Korbel Winery, with wine -tasting amongst the redwoods and historic gardens. Then, briefly visit the historic resort community of Guerneville and on to Sturgeons Mill, a restored historic lumber mill. Thursday, May 2,1:00 - 5:00 p.m. (T) XiVarric c5onoma lour Tour highlights include a visit to the Olive Press historic building and the Sonoma Plaza, the largest town square in California, laid out by General Mariano Vallejo in 1834. Next stop, a special tour of the Sonoma Mission, the last in the chain, and a visit to General Vallejo's Victorian home. Thursday, May 2,1:00 - 5:00 p.m. (7) L=)P4 Xisforic %emefery lour A popular after -dark tour of the circa 1854 Santa Rosa Rural Cemetery will take you by lamplight through the 17-acre site using the graves of pioneers, veterans, and ordinary citizens to describe life in early California. In theatrical vignettes, scenes from the past will be presented by actors. The tour includes walking one-half mile over uneven ground. Thursday, May 2, 8:30 -10:00 p.m. (T) vinia re ,7ransoorfaiion Jr jecis gour First stop, the 1904 Santa Rosa Depot with award -winning architect Glen David Mathews. Then, hear about the Petaluma Heritage Trolley Project and the 1880 pin truss bridge. Next stops are the Sebastopol Depot, restored to its original condition for use as a museum, and Healdsburg to learn how the Smithsonian's Art Train helped save these buildings. Sunday, May 5, 9:00 a.m. -1:00 p.m. (1) `Xotrhiern 6onoma Gounfj Uneries `Dour Visit the historic wineries of Healdsburg, the Alexander Valley, and the Russian River area, such as Hop Kiln and the historic stone cellars and buildings of the Simi Winery. View the potential restoration projects of the impressive Olivetto Winery ruins and the old riverfront Roma Winery. Lunch included. Sunday, May 5, 9:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. (T) Caslern c5onoma Couniy ,7fisforic. Wineries gour Travel with the restoration architect to the historic Valley of the Moon Winery near Glen Ellen and the Sebastiani Winery in Sonoma. Tour historic masonry buildings at the Buena Vista Winery. Wine -tasting everywhere! Lunch included. Sunday, May 5, 9:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. (T) csonoma Couniy , oes Yfahl woa,7our Tour Georgetown, a small privately -owned Main Street re-created from Hollywood film sets. Then, visit the historic communities of Occidental, Freestone, and Bodega, where movies such as "The Birds," "Phenomenon," "Mumford," and "Finnian's Rainbow" were filmed. Lunch included. Sunday, May 5, 9:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. (T) 007 lk- pecfal Programs � 's%ric Lane6capes 53weroafion GJ59' Zdor"op A day -long workshop of historic landscapes preservation will be led by the nationally -renowned expert, Charles Birnbaum, FASLA, and others working on preserving historic landscapes. Thursday, May 2, 9:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. (T) c lafe -VisiariealJ aLYny Coo(e Legal/c 1a&ibzV Worl&&)o The State Historical Building Safety Board quarterly meeting offers a workshop on the legal and statutory basis of the State Historical Building Code, presented by SHBSB Counsel Barbara Bell. State Architect Stephan Castellanos will also speak. Thursday, May 2, 2:00 - 5:00 p.m. "G'onneciions.• Jreseroiny America 's G'ano6cape ,G'eyacy " A special free showing of the ASLA and NPS Landscapes Initiative video Thursday, May 2, 9:00 -10:00 p.m. JrKain 61reel rreat4 Learn how California's Main Street program can help in your town's historic Main Street. California Main Street Director Barbara Mason will explain the program's benefits, and representatives from Arcata and Santa Rosa will show you how it's done. Friday, May 3, 7:15 - 8:30 a.m. (T) 5nfem&ional.�reserV&ian L =CA4i Getty Conservation Institute Director Timothy P. Whalen's personal assessment of current challenges and opportunities in the preservation of the world's cultural heritage, including the deliberate destruction of cultural icons around the world. Friday, May 3,12:15 -1:45 p.m. (T) Deoelopmeni on ilie J�ooe J�o6ile War"op This mobile workshop will include the adaptive reuse of Rosenberg's Department Store, Sonoma County Museum, Church of One Tree, and Railroad Square. Study real -life projects and real -life compromise, and how they preserve historic resources. Friday, May 3, 2:00 - 5:15 p.m. (T) C�' ornia Nislorical2esouzves gnormafion cysfem J�o&le W orj"op See how the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) can work for you, including a record search on built -environment and historic resources and other materials contained at Sonoma State University. Friday, May 3, 2:00 - 5:15 p.m. (T) Le yislalioe _7�rea6(asi From the State Legislature to the U.S. Congress, a report from those who help us lobby our elected officials. Features Sande George of Stephan/ George in Sacramento, and Susan West Montgomery from Preservation Action in Washington, D.C. Saturday, May 4, 7:30 - 8:45 a.m. (T) Jr+eseroiny fhe 5yricu&ralBano6Ycapes fact Bono(on JK le Warishop Jack London State Park is a nexus for the issues presented in the Cultural Landscapes track. These include the identification and preservation of early California agricultural landscapes and their defining features. Saturday, May 4, 9..00 a.m. -12:15 p.m. c3onama J lazes J�o6ile Wwrkshop This unique workshop at the Plaza will examine technically challenging issues such as application of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards, new development in historic districts, seismic retrofit, disabled access, financial incentives, and tourism. Saturday, May 4, 2:00 - 5:00 p.m. (T) " lie Dociar is 9n " NEW1 Preservation assistance will be available for your preservation problems. Friday, May 3, 2:00 - 5:00 p.m. (54!) Ti2hilyJ%eefinys Statc Historic Rcsources Commission Quartcrly Mccting State Historical Building Safety Board Quartcrly Meeting Thursday, May 4 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 pl 1 Thursday, May 2,1:00 - 2:00 p.m. 008 Special Events at Historic Sftes.__4 Openiny 2ecepiion of i6e Xaiional,7fisioric Landfmarrl Luh6rr Mr4=4,7fome & 9ar�,T On Thursday Evening, May 2, be welcomed to Santa Rosa and Sonoma County and enjoy local wines and hors d'oeuvres while strolling through the gardens of the world-famous horticulturist, Luther Burbank. Tour his 1884 home, the Carriage House Museum, and his beautiful jewel of a greenhouse, and chat with the preservation architect helping to ensure its restoration. (T) .denary c3e&vibn of c5ania J'-?osa "Ill-riyli c chc) l Visit the set of the Hollywood film, "When Peggy Sue Got Married," for the Friday morning, May 3, Plenary Session to be held at this 2002 Preservation Design Award -winning venue. The Keynote Speaker will be Charles Birnbaum, FASLA, one of the nation's leading champions of historic landscapes preservation. A special introduction to Sonoma County will be given by esteemed author Gaye LeBaron. California Preservation Foundation's 2002 President's Awards will also be presented. 2(iree-J76hufe c5uccew c ibries of 36e Z)e3u.4.?ouno%53arn A rip-roaring evening will be had at this 2001 Preservation Design Award newly -restored 1890s trotter horse barn. Come taste the wine, gobble the gourmet desserts, and hoot and howl at the tales of trauma, drama, and triumph in the preservation battles around the state. This Friday evening, May 3 event is always a Conference favorite! (T) G'_rJ-7Annut71 J�eeiiny Join us poolside at the Flamingo Resort for the official meeting of CPF's Membership and election of Trustees. Please note: The Registration Form has a section to order a Lunch for this meeting, but all CPF Members are invited to attend. Saturday, May 4, 12:30 - 1:45 p.m. (T for Box Lunch Only) �i niny, Danciny, ano'.Tic(cl ny & ilie .7irv000,(Jr?= lz & Uneyarv(s "Black Tie and Blue Jeans" is the theme for this elegant Wine County evening. Savor wine -tasting on the stone veranda overlooking the historic vineyards, tour the restored Craftsman home, and enjoy Dinner and Dancing in the Barn. The Live Auction will also be held on this beautiful estate in the heart of the Sonoma Wine Country. Saturday, May 4. (1) NOTE: (T) means a prepaid TICKET is required to attend (See Registration Form)11 J 0019 U_ IR ducat9onal 'cracks GulkzuILancArcapes Focuses on such topics as hpw to identify and evaluate cultural landscapes ("Cultural Landscapes: What's in a Name?"), exploring agricultural and other rural landscape issues ("Agricultural Preservation Issues in California"), understanding the interface between cultural landscapes and natural resources ("When Cultural and Natural Resources Issues Merge: How to Build Consensus"), and exploring how these concepts are applied to heritage areas ("Heritage Areas, Developing a California Model"). `Jec nobly gooffif Explores diverse technical issues facing both entry-level preservationists and practicing professionals, from issues affecting preservation planning ("Geographic Information Systems in Practice") to a lively interactive session on using the California Historical Building Code ("Case Studies: Success Stories Using the California Historical Building Code"). Learn the latest about hazardous materials ("Living with HazMat: Handling the Untouchables") and examine two diverse, yet challenging, examples of preserving historic fabric ("Retaining Historic Fabric"). (5nyayiny G',ianye: 9Xe Oeoelopmenf JrocessAr 54wervafion This track examines the four "P's' in four lively and thought -provoking sessions: "The Property," "The Players," "The Profits," and "The Process." Why is a property historic, and what are the benefits of this designation? ("The Property"). Who can develop a property and how can all parties be brought together with success in mind? ("The Players"). Understanding the profit motive for developers and how it drives a project ("The Profits"). Discover the best methods to address an historic property's unique attributes and ways to enhance success ("The Process"). Cal' rnia ,issues Preserving scenic and historic resources and protecting open space are examined in the interactive session, "Livable Communities: Smart Growth in California." The many facets of heritage tourism and its impacts on small-town economics are explored in "Tourism and Small Town Economics," and a special half -day session, "Disaster Planning and Response: Preparing for the Unthinkable," focuses on mitigating the damage to historic resources from both natural and man-made disasters. Supporting Organizations Sonoma County Landmarks Commission / California State Parks / Historic Railroad Square / Luther Burbank Home & Gardens Santa Rosa Cultural Heritage Board / Redwood Empire Chapter AIA / Petaluma Heritage Homes / Healdsburg Historical Society Western Sonoma County Historical Society / Santa Rosa Rural Cemetery Preservation Committee / Sonoma County Wine Library About the Sponsors Founded in 1976, the California Preservation: Foundation (CPF) is the only statewide educational, advocacy and membership non-profit organization working to ensure that California's rich and diverse historic resources are identified, protected, and celebrated for their history and their valuable role in California's economy, environment, and quality of life. CPF's programs include workshops and publications addressing critical preservation issues, the annual Preservation Design Awards, the "California Preservation" quarterly newsletter, technical assistance and advocacy, and the annual California Preservation Conference. Phone (510) 763-0972 for membership information. The City of Santa Rosa is the proud owner of many historic buildings and sites including the Luther Burbank Home & Gardens, the DeTurk Round Barn, and the Church of One Tree, and looks forward to your stay in "Vintage Sonoma County.' The California Office of Historic Preservation is the governmental agency primarily responsible for the statewide administration of the historic preservation program in California. Its mission is to preserve and enhance California's irreplaceable historic heritage. The Sonoma County Landmarks Commission was established by the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors in 1974 to protect areas of interestl and promote preservation. The Commission sponsors a preservation grant program and advises the County on historic resources issues. 010 .'oo9in9 The Flamingo Resort Hotel Conference Rates until April 2, 2002: $109/night, Single or Double. You must mention "California Preservation Foundation" to receive this rate. Phone (800) 848-8300. ,7rcwjporI&ion Southwest and United Airlines arc the "Official Airlines" of the California Preservation Foundation. Fly Southwest Airlines into Oakland, San Jose, or Sacramento and receive 10% off most fares. Phone (800) 433-5368 and reference the Event I.D. Code J4805. Reservations must be made at least 5 days prior to travel. Discount is valid for travel between April 26 and May 10, 2002. Fly United Airlines into San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose, or Sacramento and receive 5% off any published fare or 100/0 off full coach. Phone (800) 521-4041 and reference the Tour Code 593XX. Discount is valid for travel between April 28 and May 8, 2002. Sonoma County Airport Express offers hourly bus service to Santa Rosa from the San Francisco and Oakland Airports. The fare is S20 each way and the short cab ride from their Santa Rosa terminal is $8-10 to the Flamingo Resort Hotel. For further information phone (707) 837-8700 or visit www.airportexpressinc.com. Alamo is the "official" rental car agency of the California Preservation Foundation at the San Francisco, San Jose, and Sacramento Airports. Special rates start at $30/day or $109/week and are available from April 24 - May 12, 2002. Phone (800) 732.3232 and reference Group I.D. Number 697763 PLAN CODE GR to receive the Conference rates. National is the "official" rental car agency of the California Preservation Foundation at the Oakland Airport. Special rates start at $37/day, $173.90/week or $27.75/day for Thursday - Saturday rentals and are valid April 24 - May 12, 2002. Phone (800) 227-7368 or your travel agent or book online at www.nationalcar.com and reference Contract ID #6801006 for the Conference rates. 80£ 'oN uwJad GIVd aselsod 'S'fl IJO 111OJd-UON VSOH b.1NVS • E, , S )lV W hjuno z?zuouop aAv1ui •� 3ZIN:R:13dN00 NOITVA:OS32Jd DI"UCZO fnnrruJ� ZG 8.co-uo:lnra,casasdv:u.tof!ly.7•rnt atn Z19V6 utuJ03HVD 'pu?14e0 OZ8 arns `anuaAV 4diefiala1, 1191 uoIIepUUOJ u011pAJOSOM La�TQ•c 0WiN I o VOf/ �GF 9�5 OF AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 19, 2002 Authorization for Overnight Travel for the City Clerk to Attend the City Clerks Association of California Annual Institute - April 17 -19, 2002 in Sacramento, California RECOMMENDATION: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: , l STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve authorization for overnight travel for the City Clerk to attend the City Clerks Association of California Annual Institute in Sacramento, California, April 17 - 19, 2002. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: This seminar will be funded from Travel, Training and Meetings Account #101-201- 637-000. The breakdown of estimated expenditures for this meeting is as follows: • Registration $310 • Meals $ 50 • Travel $100 • Hotel 51 1 Total $ 971 CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The Annual Institute provides educational opportunities for California City Clerks in the areas of creating "Paperless Agendas," Conflict Resolution, Legislative Tracking, and Management of Document Imaging. It also is approved by the International Institute of Municipal Clerks (IIMC) for credit toward the Master Municipal Clerk designation which the City Clerk of La Quinta is currently pursuing. Please see the attached pages for course titles (Attachment 1). FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve authorization for overnight travel for the City Clerk to attend the City Clerks Association of California Annual Institute in Sacramento, California, April 17-19, 2002; or 2. Do not approve the request for overnight travel; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, June Greek, City Clerk Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Announcement showing class subjects CAwpdocs\Staff Reports\Calif City Clerk's Institute �•• �/ ooz ATTACHMENT 1 City Clerks Association Annual Conference 2002 "Central Takes Us to the Capital in the Year of the Horse" April 17-19, 2002 Sheraton Grand Hotel, Sacramento TIME/DATE DESCRIPTION Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:00 a.m. - 8:00 a.m. "Energy Chi" Room: Beavis Start your day by awakening the natural vital energy inside you. Energy Chi combines slow, simple movements, and breath work to stimulate the circulation of Chi (positive energy, life force) in your body. 7:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Room: 8:00 a.m. Room: 8:30 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. Room: Presiding: Joann Tilton, CMS:, City Clerk, City of Manteca Registration Opens Grand Nave Foyer Meet the Vendors - An Opportunity to Visit Exhibits Grand Nave Foyer/Magnolia Welcome/Opening Session Camellia Pledge of Allegiance The National Anthem sung by Officer Sacramento Police Department City of Sacramento Mayor Heather Sacramento Liesl Marin of the Fargo's welcome to Katherine Meissner, Stockton, CCAC President 1 004 9:00 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. General Session - "The Superb City Clerk — Active, Agile and Accountable." Room: Camellia We are living in an era where people want more and less government at the same time. This means that you must perform your duties extremely well and effectively promote yourself (and your city), too. This program will supply tools for creating an active, agile, and accountable City Clerk. Come join us for a motivational and high -content program! Keynote Speaker: Mark Towers, Founder of Speak Out Seminars. Presiding: Katherine Meissner, CMC, City of Stockton, CCAC President 11:45 a.m. - 1:30 p.m. Special Entertainment, General Session and Luncheon Room: Magnolia "Greetings from City of Stockton Mayor Gary Podesto" CCAC President Katherine Meissner unveils the first online educational program for the professional City Clerk. An enrichment program jointly designed by City Clerks and San Joaquin Delta College (SJDC) for City Clerks Presiding: Katherine Meissner, CMC, City of Stockton, CCAC President Jan Truscott, Business Chair, SJDC Dr. Hazel Hill, Dean of Vocational Education, SJDC 1:30 p.m. - 2:00 p.m. Meet the Vendors - An Opportunity to Visit Exhibits Room: Grand Nave Foyer/Magnolia 2:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. Capitol Tours - plan to meet at the conference registration desk 15 minutes prior to your tour. Grand Nave Foyer Session "A" -Tour State Capitol First 60 to register will have the privilege of touring the State Capitol, and visiting your Legislator. Notification must be coordinated in advance if you wish to visit your Legislator. Bring comfortable shoes, a 3-block walk to the Capitol. You can tour the restored historic offices of the Attorney General, Secretary of State, Treasurer, and the Governor of the State of California. There are 40 acres of gardens in the surrounding Capitol Park, including trees from around the world. The Vietnam Veterans' Memorial is also on these grounds. 2 3 005 Session "B" - State Library Tour A behind the scenes tour of the State Library Archives to view preserved historical documents. Located on 1020 "O" Street, meet at State Museum Lobby. Session "C" - State Museum Tour A self -guided tour of the Golden State Museum, 1020 "O" Street. There is a $4 admittance fee. Must show CCAC Conference Badge. Session "D" - Feng Shui Room: Bataglieri "Creating Sacred Spaces at Work and Nome" This workshop will introduce the participants to the basic principles of the ancient practice of Feng Shui, which is becoming increasingly popular in the West because of its profound and timeless wisdom. Erica will show you how you can transform your work and home into an environment, which will reflect who you truly are, and bring harmony as well as prosperity into both your personal and professional lives. Speaker: Erica 5ofrina, Certif ied Feng 5hui Consultant, 5ofrina Design Interiors Presiding: Kay Keck, CMC, City Clerk, City of Dublin 5:30 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Reception Room: Grand Nave Foyer/Magnolia Donna Reynolds - Pianist/Singer Dinner Sacramento On Your Own TIME/DATE DESCRIPTION Thursday, April 18, 2002 7:00 a.m. - 8:00 a.m. "Energy Chi" Room: Beavis Joann Tilton, CMC, City Clerk, City of Manteca 7:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Registration and An Opportunity to Visit Vendors Room: Grand Nave Foyer/Magnolia 3 1 j-) r% 11..0 0c6 8:00 a.m.- 9:00 a.m. Hot Plated Breakfast Room: Magnolia California Alternative Certification Institute (ACI) Presentation and Discussion on Alternative CEPO Design Presiding: Colleen Nicol, CMC-CCAC Immediate Past President 9:00 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. Session "A" - Panel Discussion "Paperless Agendas" Room: Bataglieri Listen to a panel discussion of City Clerks distributing paperless agendas and learn from their experience. Panel: Karen Diaz, CMC, City Clerk, City of Brentwood; Sonia Orozco, Assistant City Clerk, City of Roseville; Margaret Wimberly, Assistant City Clerk, City of Tracy Presiding: Renee Elliott, Deputy City Clerk, City of Fremont 9:00 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. Session "B" - "Revitalizing Community Relations" Room: Compango It's not just an adventure, it's a job. Government and community joined with the news media many times treat each other as the enemy, the famous "them vs. us" theory. So, is it time to revitalize your skills in dealing with both groups and still enjoy your job? This can be done with some understanding on how all the groups work and what makes them listen and eventually become part of the community team. Speaker: Rex Osborn, Osborn and Associates Presiding: Marsha Whalen, City Clerk, City of Escondido 9:00 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. Session "C" - "Conflict Resolution" Room: Camellia A program designed to provide tools for the City Clerk who encounters negative, aggressive, or even hostile behavior. This seminar provides a clearly defined method of verbally handling aggressiveness though a situational management philosophy. J.D. Wesson has designed this program material to motivate 0 () G 7 professionals by demonstrating where their control is based and how to use their professional power. Speaker: J.D. Wesson, J.D. Wesson & Associates Presiding: Trish Sanders, City Clerk, City of Palm Springs 10:30 a.m. - Noon IIMC Region IX Annual Meeting - General Session Room: Magnolia This meeting is rotated within the region and this year it is our privilege to host the IIMC Region IX Annual Meeting. Plan to attend this informative meeting. Presiding: Pam Nigliazzo, MMC, City of Napa Barbara Price, CMC, City of Puyallup, Washington Noon - 1:30 p.m. General Session and Luncheon Room: Magnolia Honoring Retired City Clerks, Introduction of Special CCAC Guests Presiding: Katherine Meissner, Stockton, CCAC President 1:30.p.m. - 2:15 p.m. Meet the Vendors Room: Grand Nave Foyer/Magnolia 2:15 p.m. - 4:45 p.m. Session "A" - "De -mystifying Legislative Tracking" Room: Camellia An information packed session on how to track bills and how to learn more about bill status and process. Speaker: Rod Tuttle, Lobbyist Presiding: Rhonda Greenlee, CMC, City Clerk, City of Turlock 2:15 p.m. - 4:45 p.m. Session "B" -"Document Imaging Management" Room: Gardenia A presentation on the latest information on DIM systems. Learn best practices (as well as what not to do) to make your document imaging project efficient and legal. Speaker: Diane Gladwell, CMC, Gladwell Governmental Services, Inc. 5 068 Presiding: Mercy Cabral, Deputy City Clerk, City of Martinez 5:30 p.m. - 6:30 p.m. Reception and Start of Silent Auction Room: Grand Nave Foyer 6:30 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. President's Banquet - Cocktail or Chinese Attire Room: Camellia/Gardenia CCAC President Kat Meissner will present "Clerk of the Year and Awards of Distinction" TIME/DATE DESCRIPTION Friday, April 19, 2002 7:00 a.m. "'Energy Chi" Room: Beavis Joann Tilton, CMC, City Clerk, City of Manteca 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. Hot Plated Breakfast Room: Magnolia 9:00 a.m. - Noon "Hire for Performance" Room: Magnolia Learn how to be interviewed to get the job you want. One way to improve our hiring success is to use "behavior based" interview questions. Participants in this workshop will prepare f ive behavior -based questions. In groups of two, participants will practice their interview skills and coach each other on the use of the behavior -based method. Tom McKee is a speaker, consultant, trainer, and counselor who has spoken to over one- half million people. A fast paced session filled with a lot of useful and practical information. Keynote Speaker: Tom McKee, Advantage Point Systems, Inc., Gold River, CA Presiding: Connie Strohmayer, CMC, City Clerk, City of Redding Noon Adjournment 1 •--) .�. N 6 0G9 Future Conf erences: International Institute of Municipal Clerks 56th IIMC Annual Conference May 19-23, 2002 San Antonio, Texas League of California Cities New Law and Election Seminar December 11-13, 2002 Monterey, CA 7 1 j I 010 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 19, 2002 Approval of the Art Purchase Agreement with Dale Frank for the La Quinta Court Art Feature RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: /01.. STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve the Art Purchase Agreement with Dale Frank for the La Quinta Court Art Feature and authorize the City Manager to execute the Art Purchase Agreement. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None at this time. At the February 6, 2001 City Council meeting, the City Council allocated $65,000 from the Art in Public Places Account for the water feature for the La Quinta Court project. At the June 5, 2001 City Council meeting, modifications were proposed by the developer of this project with a final cost of $87,525. The City Council allocated additional funds from the Art in Public Places Account to accommodate the modifications. The final amount allocated to this project at this time is $87,525. No additional funds are being requested for this project. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: On January 23, 2001, Mr. Dale Frank submitted a water feature schematic for consideration by the City Council. The modified concept provides eight "art walls" which are 6 feet high. Mr. Frank has indicated to staff that the modified version of the water feature would cost approximately $65,000 to construct. However, according to Mr. Frank, if additional features were added to the structure or to the surfaces, this may result in additional costs. At the February 6, 2001 City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to work with the developer to better define the details of the water feature and to prepare an Art Purchase Agreement. An allocation of $65,000 was provided for this project from the Art in Public Places Fund. 13 Staff met with Rod Murphy, representing the developer, Dale Frank, and Dennis Marshall, the artist, to review the project details as discussed by the City Council at the February 6, 2001 City Council meeting. The features that are contained in the approved fountain design include: ■ 114 foot curvilinear fountain ■ two foot high outer walls ■ eight six foot panels, offset throughout the fountain ■ panels constructed of a textured concrete ■ water running over the edge of the panels into the pool of the fountain ■ seating surfaces along the outer wall of the fountain ■ multiple boulders inside the fountain as well as outside ■ lighting of the fountain pool At the April 3, 2001 City Council meeting, the artist, Mr. Marshall presented a marquette of a water feature. It was determined that the City Council would like to see a "stair -step" effect to the water feature, increasing the dimensions to the base of the water feature. The City Council approved the original concept for the La Quinta Court art feature with a budget of $65,000. However, once the developer and artist re-evaluated the project with the modifications, the estimated cost of the project increased to $87,525. At the June 5, 2001 City Council meeting, the City Council approved the additional funds needed to complete the water feature, as provided in Attachment 1. Staff contacted Mr. Murphy regarding Mr. Frank's signature needed to complete the Art Purchase Agreement. Due to a change in construction management companies, the Art Purchase Agreement was not executed. Also at this time, the original artist no longer was involved with the La Quinta Court Project. Mr. Frank hired a new construction management team and they in turn contacted a new artist, Manuel Mendoza, to complete the project. Mr. Mendoza took the City Council's comments from the April 3, 2001 City Council meeting in which the "stair -step" effect was to be designed as well as expanded bases for the bases of the water features. In order to accommodate the terraced look and the wider bases, the number of water "towers" was reduced to three. However, the effect the City Council desired, water rippling over all sides of the fountain, will be achieved. Attachment 2 depicts the stair step effect desired by the City Council, however, this example does not reflect the actual La Quinta Court art feature design. Attachment 2 is provided merely as a visual example of water rippling over the edges of the art feature. Attachment 3 provides a blueprint of the water feature, as defined in the Art Purchase Agreement. The proposed art feature is designed as originally directed by the City Council with minor modifications to allow the art feature to be scaled to the setting: (bold text represents modifications to the original design) A ■ 114 f (110 foot) curvilinear fountain S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.192.La Quinta Court Art Feature.wpd 002 ■ two foot high outer walls ■ eight (two) six foot (six foot, six inch) s (towers) , offset at the east and west ends of the fountain ■ one seven foot six inch tower in the middle of the fountain ■ panels -(towers) constructed of a textured concrete (to simulate natural stone) ■ stone texture to simulate a "stair -step" effect ■ water over (rippling over) the edge of the ems -(towers) into the pool of the fountain ■ seating surfaces along the outer wall of the fountain ■ multiple boulders inside the fountain as well as outside ■ lighting of the fountain pool The Art Purchase Agreement is provided as Attachment 4. Should the City Council agree with the minor modifications to the art feature as outlined above and in the Art Purchase Agreement, the Art Purchase Agreement can be executed. It is the estimate of the artist that it will take approximately 60 to 90 days to complete the art feature. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the Art Purchase Agreement with Dale Frank for the La Quinta Court Art Feature and authorize the City Manager to execute the Art Purchase Agreement; or 2. Do not approve the Art Purchase Agreement with Dale Frank for the La Quinta Court Art Feature and authorize the City Manager to execute the Art Purchase Agreement; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. e4tfully jubmitted, munity Services Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Minutes from the June 5, 2001 City Council Meeting 2. Photograph of Stair Step Fountain (Example) 3. Water Feature Blueprint 4. Art Purchase Agreement S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.192.La Quinta Court Art Feature.wpd City Council Minutes Council Member Adolph agreed. ATTACHMENT 1 y; June 5, 2001 Council Member Henderson suggested the Cove Oasis site be included in the fee schedule and treated as a stand-alone category. She asked if BBQs can be brought into parks if not provided as a park amenity. Ms. Horvitz stated BBQs are prohibited in City parks without a permit. Mayor Pena questioned how that might affect City -sponsored events and suggested City -sponsored events be exempt. Council concurred. Council Member Adolph stated he felt the policy should address the disposal of hot coals. City Manager Genovese suggested a continuance to address the language on "bounce -houses" so any type of play equipment has to be approved by the Community Services Director. Council concurred. Council Member Henderson stated she felt the fee schedule should be for all City parks with specific uses at specific parks listed within the fee schedule. Mr. Genovese stated that issue will be addressed when the policy is brought back for Council approval. Council Member Sniff commented on the need to keep the policy simple and uniform as possible. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Henderson/Sniff to continue consideration of Facilities Use Policies to July 5, 2001. Motion carried unanimously with Council Member Perkins ABSENT. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2001-72. :.4%jj.6. CONSIDERATION OF THE LA QUINTA COURT ART FEATURE AND ART PURCHASE AGREEMENT. Community Services Director Horvitz presented the staff report and advised the developer proposes changing the square towers to a circular pattern with no change in cost. 13 uL5 City Council Minutes 9 June 5, 2001 ` In response to Council Member Sniff, Ms. Horvitz confirmed the art feature will be illuminated. In response to Council Member Adolph, Ms. Horvitz stated she understood the rippling water will be visible from inside the restaurant as well as from the street. The towers will be four to seven feet high with natural boulders inside and outside of the water feature. Council Member Adolph commented on the need for landscaping around the water feature and Ms. Horvitz stated the developer is working with staff on the landscape plan. Council Member Sniff supported moving forward with the proposed design. Council concurred. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to approve the La Quinta Court Art Feature as submitted and recommended by the developer (circular -shaped water feature), authorize an additional $22,525 from the Art in Public Places Fund, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Art Purchase Agreement with any changes required by the City Attorney. Motion carried unanimously with Council Member Perkins ABSENT. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2001-73. Council concurred to take up Study Session Item No. 1 at this time. STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS FOR FUTURE USE OF CITY -OWNED FACILITY AT 51-351 AVENIDA BERMUDAS AND DISCUSSION OF MAINSTREET MARKETPLACE EVENTS. Assistant City Manager Weiss presented a brief staff report. Council Member Sniff stated he felt the facility use should relate to activities on Calle Estado, including storage of banners, etc, and support promotion of the village. He suggested five festivals (fall, spring, winter, holiday, and City birthday) in place of the Mainstreet Marketplace events. Elaine Reynolds, of La Quinta Arts Association, suggested a possibility of the Arts Association sharing use of the facility with the Alliance group but noted neither can afford the facility's maintenance costs. s +�. «� 0 e ATTACHMENT 3 �z i• r ATTACHMENT 4 T 0 4&t 4 �Qut«rw ART PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS ART PURCHASE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is entered into this 5' day of June, 2001, by and among THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation (the "City"), JDD, LLC (Developer), and Manuel Mendoza, an individual (Artist). RECITALS A. The Developer is currently constructing a retail center on the southeast corner of Washington Street and Highway 111. To meet the requirements for artwork pursuant to Chapter 2.65 of the City Municipal Code, the Developer is commissioning the fabrication and installation of certain ARTWORK (the "Artwork") to be installed and displayed by the Developer at the SITE LOCATION which is the terminus of the southeast corner of Washington Street and Highway 111 (the "Site Location"). NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, for the consideration and under the conditions hereinafter set forth, hereby mutually agree as follows: ARTICLE I. SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.1 Scope of Design Services. Artist shall prepare or cause to be prepared, any required approvals for all shop drawings, details, and samples, and shall do all other things necessary and incidental to the performance of the Artist's obligations pursuant to this Agreement. 1.2 Scope of Fabrication Services. Artist shall fabricate, transport and install the Artwork pursuant to and by the times set forth in the Scope of Design Build Services and the Schedule of Performance attached hereto as Exhibit A and Exhibit B, respectively, and incorporated herein by this reference. The City shall have the right to review the Artwork at reasonable times during the fabrication thereof. Artist shall submit to the City monthly progress narratives, including photographs, as required by the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit B). The narratives shall include the percentage of the Artwork completed to date, along with an estimated completion date. Artist shall furnish all tools, equipment, apparatus, facilities, plant, labor, services, materials, and all utilities and transportation, including power, fuel, and water, and to perform all work necessary to construct, transport and install in a good and workmanlike manner the scope of work set forth in the Scope of Design Build Services (Exhibit A), or reasonably inferable therein, together with the appurtenances thereto, at the Site Location. It is understood and agreed that all said plant, labor, services, materials, equipment, and facilities shall be furnished and said work performed and completed by Artist as an independent contractor, subject to the inspection and approval of the City or its representatives. S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 1 of k The Artist shall present to the City in writing for further review and approval any and all significant changes in the scope, design, color, size, material or texture, of the Artwork not permitted by or not in substantial conformity with the approved working drawings and the Scope of Design Build Services (Exhibit A). A significant change is any change in the scope, design, color, size, material, texture, or Site Location which affects installation, scheduling, site preparation, or maintenance for the Artwork or the schematic concept of the Artwork as represented in the schematic drawings, the approved working drawings, and the Scope of Design Build Services (Exhibit A) . Developer and Artist, as applicable, shall at all times maintain proper facilities and provide safe access for inspection of the Artwork by the City, its engineer or representatives, and to the sites wherein the Artwork is located prior to installation. Where specifications require work to be specially tested or approved, it shall not be tested without timely notice to the City, of its readiness for inspection and without the approval thereof, or consent thereto by the City. The Developer shall promptly notify the respective departments or official bodies when the artist's work is ready for inspection and the artist agrees, at once, do all work required to remove any violations or to comply with such inspections, without additional charge to the City. The Developer and/or Artist, as applicable, shall perform all work necessary to obtain approvals from the authorities mentioned above without additional cost to the City. 1.3 Change Orders. In addition to the change orders and extra work specified and provided for in the Scope of Design Build Services (Exhibit A), the City may at any time during the progress of the completion and installation of the Artwork and up to the date of the issuance of a Notice of Completion as hereinafter defined, when in the City's reasonable determination the public interest and necessity so require, request any alterations, deviations, additions to or omissions from this Agreement, Scope of Design Build Services (Exhibit A), or the work, labor and materials to be furnished thereunder, and the same shall in no way affect or make void this Agreement. Artist shall adhere strictly to the Scope of Design Build Services (Exhibit A), unless a change therefrom is authorized in writing. In such case, the terms of said change shall be understood and agreed upon in writing by the City, Developer and Artist before commencement of said revised work. 1.4 Post -Fabrication Services. a. The Developer shall notify the City in writing when fabrication of the Artwork is completed and ready for delivery and installation at the Site Location which is designated in Exhibit E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. b. Upon completion and at all times during fabrication and installation, the Artwork shall comply with all applicable statutes, ordinances and regulations of any governmental agency having jurisdiction over the Artwork. 1�110 S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 2 of 20 1.5 Post -Installation. a. The Artist shall be available at such reasonable time or times as may be agreed between the City, Developer and Artist to attend any and all inauguration, ground breaking, or presentation ceremonies upon completion of the Artwork. b . The Developer shall use reasonable efforts to arrange for publicity for the completed Artwork by local media and publications, and otherwise as may be determined between the City, Developer and Artist as soon as practicable following installation. C. Upon installation of the Artwork, the Artist shall provide the Developer and City with written instructions for appropriate maintenance and preservation of the Artwork. 1.6 Final Acceptance. a. The Artist shall advise the Developer and the City in writing that the Artwork will become the responsibility of the City on the effective date of completion of the project and the acceptance as complete by the Developer and the City. Following receipt of such notice the City shall cause the installed Artwork to be inspected by suitably qualified and appropriate professional(s), and within five (5) days following completion of such inspection(s), the City shall either provide Developer with reasonably specific written objections to the installed Artwork or notify the Developer of its acceptance of the Artwork by a Notice of Completion in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D . Such Notice of Completion (Exhibit D) shall be evidence of the satisfactory completion and installation of the Artwork in conformity with this Agreement, subject to the indemnification, representations, and further performance obligations set forth in this Agreement. b. Final Acceptance by the City of the ownership of the Artwork will occur at the filing of the Notice of Completion. At that time, the ownership and responsibility for the Artwork will rest with the City of La Quinta. 1.7 Risk of Loss. Upon receipt of the Notice of Completion, the risk of loss or damage to the Artwork shall be borne by the City. The Artist shall take such measures as are necessary to protect the Artwork from loss or damage, through insurance or other adequate security, and to maintain the Artwork until the Notice of Completion is made by the City. 1.8 Title. Title to the Artwork and any construction drawings, plans, or other work product generated pursuant to this Agreement shall remain with the Artist during fabrication and installation, and shall pass and vest with the City upon issuance of Final Acceptance or Termination pursuant to Article IX hereof. 1.9 Payment: The Developer shall be paid the compensation set forth in Exhibit C. The total compensation to be paid to the Developer shall not exceed $87,525 (eighty seven thousand, five hundred twentyfive dollars). S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 3 of 20 ARTICLE II. TIME OF PERFORMANCE 2.1 Time. Developer and Artist agree to punctually and diligently perform all their obligations under this Agreement. It is further understood and agreed that should the Artist fail to furnish the labor, materials, equipment, and or services, to perform all work and labor as herein provided in the manner herein set forth in good and workmanlike manner, Artist shall, in addition to any other penalties provided in the Agreement, be liable to the City for all losses or damages that either may suffer on account thereof. In the event Artist at the time refuses or neglects to supply a sufficient number of properly skilled workers or a sufficient quantity of materials of proper quality, or in effect be adjudicated bankrupt, or files a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, or commits any act of insolvency, or makes an assignment, for benefit or creditors, without the City's and Developer's prior written consent, or fails to make prompt payment to his materialmen and laborers, or fails in any respect to properly and diligently prosecute the work covered by this Agreement, or otherwise fails to perform fully any and all of the Covenants and obligations herein contained; then the City and Developer may, at either of their option, (1) after giving twenty-four (24) hours written notice to Artist and City or Developer, as applicable, provide any such labor and materials as may be necessary ; or (2) terminate the Artist's right to proceed with the work and, in the event, the City and/or Developer, at either of their option, shall have the right to enter upon the Artist's warehouse and take possession, for the purpose of completing the work included under this Agreement, of the Artwork or any portion thereof, and all materials, tools, and appliances thereon, and may employ any other person or persons to finish the work and provide the materials therefor. In the event City provides labor and/or materials, as set forth in (1) above, or finishes the work, as set forth in (2) above, City may deduct the cost of such labor and materials and all costs incurred in finishing the work, if applicable, from any money then due or thereafter to become due to Developer under this Agreement until the work undertaken by the City is completely finished. At that time, if the unpaid balance of the amount to be paid to the Developer under this Agreement exceeds the expenses incurred by the City in providing labor and materials and/or in finishing Artist's work, such excess shall be paid by the City to Developer, but if such expense shall exceed such unpaid balance, then Developer shall promptly pay to City the amount by which such expense shall exceed such unpaid balance. The expense incurred by the City as herein provided, either for furnishing materials, or for finishing the work, and any damages incurred by the City by reason of Artist's default, shall be chargeable to, and paid by Developer, aforesaid, to secure the payment thereof. If the City and/or Developer elects not to terminate Artist's right to proceed, Developer agrees to reimburse the City for losses or damages resulting for the delay in speedy progress of work. If Artist should neglect to prosecute the work properly or fail to perform any provisions of this Agreement, the City and/or Developer, after ten (10) days written notice to Artist, may without prejudice to any other remedy it may have make good such deficiencies. In the event the City makes good such deficiencies, it may deduct the cost thereof from the payment , then or thereafter due Developer. t-, JL S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 4 of 20 In addition to specific provisions of Agreement, performance by either party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in default where delays or defaults are due to war, insurrection, strikes, lock -outs, riots, floods, earthquakes, fires, casualties, supernatural causes, acts of the public enemy, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, freight embargoes, lack of transportation, governmental restrictions or priority, litigation, unusually severe weather, inability to secure necessary labor, materials or tools, delays of any contractor, subcontractor or supplies, acts of the other party, acts or failure to act of any public or governmental agency or entity, including, without limitation, unreasonable delays in the processing and issuance of required permits for the installation of the Artwork by Developer (except that any act or failure to act of City shall not excuse performance by City) or any other causes beyond the reasonable control or without the fault of the party claiming an extension of time to perform. Notwithstanding the foregoing, market and economic conditions shall not entitle Developer to an extension of time to perform. An extension of time for any such cause shall be for the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if notice by the party claiming such extension is sent to the other party within ten (10) days of knowledge of the commencement of the cause. In addition, times of performance under this Agreement may be extended by mutual written agreement by City and Developer. ARTICLE III. WARRANTIES 3.1 Tom. The Artist represents and warrants that: (a) the Artwork is solely the result of the artistic effort of the Artist; (b) except as otherwise disclosed in writing to both the City and Developer, the Artwork is unique and original and does not infringe upon any copyright; (c) the Artwork, or a duplicate thereof, has not been accepted for sale elsewhere; and (d) the Artwork is free and clear of any and all encumbrances and/or monetary liens. 3.2 Quality and Condition. The Artist represents and warrants, except as otherwise disclosed to both the City and Developer in writing, that: (a) the fabrication of the Artwork will be performed in a workmanlike manner; (b) the Artwork, as fabricated and following installation, will be free of patent and latent defects in material and workmanship, including any defects or qualities which cause or accelerate deterioration of the Artwork; and (c) reasonable maintenance of the Artwork will not require procedures substantially in excess of those described in the maintenance recommendations to be submitted by the Artist to both the City and Developer hereunder. The warranties described in this Section 3.2 shall survive for a period of one (1) year after the Acceptance of the Artwork, except the representation and warranty concerning latent defects shall survive for a period of three (3) years from after Acceptance of the Artwork. The City and/or Developer shall give notice to the Artist of any observed and claimed breach with reasonable promptness. The Artist shall, at the request of the City or Developer, and at no cost to the City or Developer, cure reasonably and promptly the breach of any such warranty which is curable by the Artist and which cure is consistent with professional conservation standards 1 4 S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 5 of 20 "+ M L• 1. �.I (including, for example, cure by means of repair or refabrication of the Artwork) . ARTICLE IV. PERFORMANCE BONDS The Artist shall not be required by the City to post any performance bonds or similar undertakings, and any requirement of any other authority for performance bonds shall be the responsibility of the City. Nevertheless, Artist shall prevent any lien from attaching to the Artwork by any person claiming under Artist. ARTICLE V. REPRODUCTION RIGHTS 5.1 General. The Artist shall retain all rights under the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. Sections 101 et seq. , and all other rights in and to the Artwork except ownership and possession, except as such rights are limited by this Agreement. In view of the intention that the Artwork in its final dimension shall be unique, the Artist shall not make any additional exact duplicate, dimensional reproductions of the final artwork, nor shall the Artist grant permission to others to do so except with the written permission of both the City and Developer, provided, however, that at such time as Final Acceptance by the City, the City alone may grant such approval. The Artist grants to the City, Developer and its assigns an irrevocable license to make two-dimensional reproductions of the Artwork for noncommercial purposes, including but not limited to reproductions used in advertising, brochures, media publicity, and catalogues or other similar publications, provided that these rights are exercised in a tasteful and professional manner. 5.2 Notice. All reproductions by the City and Developer shall contain a credit to the Artist and denote its location, provided that the Artwork is protected by United States copyright law and reasonable substantiation thereof is provided to the City. 5.3 Re is ration. The Artist may at its expense cause to be registered, with the United States Register of Copyrights, a copyright in the Artwork in the Artist's name. ARTICLE VI. ARTIST'S RIGHTS 6.1 Identification. The City shall, at its expense, prepare and install at the site location, a plaque identifying the Artist, the title of the Artwork and the year of completion, and shall reasonably maintain such notice in good repair against the ravages of time, vandalism and the elements. 6.2 Maintenance. The parties recognize that maintenance of the Artwork on a regular basis is essential to the integrity of the Artwork. 6.3 Repairs and Restoration. a. The City shall have the right to determine, after consultation with a 14 20 professional art conservator, when and if repairs and restoration to the Artwork will be made. To the extent practical, the Artist, during the Artist's lifetime, may be given the opportunity to make or personally supervise significant repairs and restorations and shall be paid a reasonable fee for S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 6 of 20 any such services, provided that the City, Developer and the Artist mutually agree in writing, prior to the commencement of any significant repairs or restorations, upon the Artist's fee for such services. No fees shall be paid to Artist for repair or restoration due to a breach of the representations and warranties set forth herein. b. All repairs and restorations shall be made in accordance with recognized principles of conservation. 6.4 Maintenance and Alteration of the Artwork. a. The City shall maintain the Artwork in a manner that the City determines appropriate in its sole discretion. b. The City shall use its reasonable efforts to meet and consult with Artist prior to the time of making any alteration. If any alteration is made without the consent of Artist, Artist shall have the right to direct the City to remove Artist's name from the Artwork. In connection herewith, Artist hereby acknowledges and agrees that Artist is familiar with the California Art Preservation Act, as set forth in Section 987 of the California Civil Code and the_ Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990, as set forth in 17 United States Code Annotated, Section 106A, and the rights and protection afforded Artist thereunder, and Artist hereby waives each and all of Artist's rights and protection under Section 987 of the California Civil Code and under 17 United States Code Annotated, Section 106A, to the extent such rights and protection are inconsistent with this Section 6.4; provided, however, that to the extent that the rights and protection afforded Artist under Section 987 of the California Civil Code are not inconsistent with this Section 6.4 or pertain to matters that are not dealt with in this Section 6.4, Artist shall retain such rights and protection. 6.5 Permanent Record. The City shall maintain a record of this Agreement and of the location and disposition of the Artwork. 6.6 Artist's and Developer's Address. The Artist and Developer shall notify the City of changes in their address. The City shall take reasonable effort(s) to locate the Artist when matters arise relating to the Artist's rights under this Agreement. 6.7 Surviving Covenants. The covenants and obligations set forth in this Article VI shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, legatees, executors, administrators, assigns, transferees and all their successors in interest, and the City's covenants do attach and run with the Artwork and shall be binding to and until twenty (20) years after the death of the Artist unless otherwise stated herein. Upon the death of the Artist, the representative of Artist's estate shall assume the surviving covenants and obligations of Artist set forth in this Article VI. ARTICLE VII. ARTIST AS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR 11 The Artist shall perform all work under this Agreement as an independent 14 -) contractor and not as an agent, joint venturer, partner or an employee of the City or the - Developer. The Artist shall not: S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 7 of 20 a. be supervised by any employee or official of the City or Developer; b. exercise supervision over any employee or official of the City or the Developer; C. have authority to contract for or bind the City or Developer in any manner; or represent itself as an agent of the City or Developer; or otherwise be authorized to act for or on behalf of the City or Developer; d. have status as the City's or Developer's employee or have any right to any benefits that the City or Developer grants to its employees. ARTICLE VIII. ASSIGNMENT OR TRANSFER No party shall assign or transfer an interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other parties, provided, however, that claims for money due or to become due from the City or Developer under this Agreement may be assigned to a financial institution without approval. ARTICLE IX. TERMINATION The City and/or Developer may, at either of their option, by written notice to the Artist, terminate this Agreement either (a) upon the failure by Artist to perform any of its obligations hereunder in accordance with the terms hereof or any other breach by Artist of the terms of this Agreement, and such failure or breach continues uncured for fifteen (15) days following notice thereof from the City or Developer, as applicable, to Artist ("Termination for Default"), or (b) at any other time in the sole and absolute discretion of the City and Developer ("Discretionary Termination"). Termination for Default and Discretionary Termination are sometimes hereinafter collectively referred to as "Termination". Upon Termination, except as provided in this Article IX, all parties shall be released from all further obligations and liability hereunder. Effective upon a Termination, the Artwork, or so much thereof or has then been completed, shall be transferred to and shall belong to the Developer. In such event and upon Artist's written request, the Developer shall remove Artist's name from the Artwork. Upon a Termination for Default or upon a Discretionary Termination instituted by Developer, and subject to Article 2.1, Developer shall reimburse City for all compensation paid in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation (Exhibit C), and City shall be relieved of any further liability to make payments hereunder; upon a Discretionary Termination by City, Developer shall be entitled to that portion of the costs and expenses of Design Fabrication and Installation of Artwork provided for in Exhibit C hereto that is then payable pursuant to the Schedule of Compensation (Exhibit C), plus all costs reasonably incurred by Artist following last payment pursuant to the Schedule of Compensation prior to the date of the Discretionary Termination, provided that Artist 144 shall be required to provided the City with reasonable substantiation for such costs. S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 8 of 20 Notwithstanding anything else herein contained, Artist shall not be relieved of liability to the Developer and/or City for damages sustained by the Developer and/or City, as applicable, by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by the Artist, and the City may reasonably withhold payments to the Developer until such time as the exact amount of such damages is determined. In the event of a Termination, Developer is not released of the responsibility for providing the completion of the Artwork for the Site Location or shall provide a replacement work of art approved by the City. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in the event Developer has this Artwork completed, City shall compensate Developer for any amounts remaining under the Schedule of Compensation. In the event Developer elects to provide a replacement, City agrees to reasonably cooperate with Developer to negotiate and execute a replacement contract providing for the City's purchase of the replacement artwork. ARTICLE X. CONTRACTOR ADMINISTRATOR The Contract Administrator for this Agreement shall be the City Community Services Director. Wherever this Agreement requires any notice to be given to or by the City, or any determination or action to be made by the City, the City Community Services Director shall represent and act for the City. ARTICLE XI. NON-DISCRIMINATION In carrying out the performance of the services designated herein, none of the Developer, Artist and the City shall discriminate as to race, color, creed, religion, marital status, national origin or ancestry, and the Artist shall comply with the equality of employment opportunity provisions of State and local laws and regulations as presently existing or hereafter amended. ARTICLE XII. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement, and all of the exhibits attached hereto, embodies the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties hereto, and there are no other agreements or understandings, oral or written, with reference to the subject matter hereof that are not merged herein and superseded hereby, except as set forth herein above. ARTICLE XIII. MODIFICATION No alteration, change or modification of the terms of the Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by each party hereto and approved by appropriate action of the City. ARTICLE XIV. WAIVER 14 5 �-17 No waiver of performance by any party hereto shall be construed as or operate as a waiver of any subsequent default of any terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement. The S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 9 of 20 payment or acceptance of fees for any period after a default shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or acceptance of defective performance. ARTICLE XV. GOVERNING LAW 15.1 This Agreement, regardless of where executed or performed, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 15.2 In addition to any other rights or remedies and subject to the restrictions otherwise set forth in this Agreement, any party hereto may institute legal action to seek specific performance of the terms of this Agreement, to recover damages, or to obtain any other remedy, at law or in equity, consistent with the purpose of this Agreement. Such legal actions must be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, in an appropriate Riverside County municipal court, or in the Federal District Court in the district of California which includes Riverside County. 15.3 If any party to this Agreement brings a legal action or proceeding against another party to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, or on account of a claim or dispute arising out of this Agreement, then the prevailing party in such arbitration or legal action or proceeding shall be entitled to reimbursement by the other party of the legal fees and costs, including reasonable attorney fees and expert witness fees, incurred by the prevailing party in connection with the legal action or proceeding. ARTICLE XVI. HEIRS AND ASSIGNS This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the City and Artist, and their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and permitted assigns. ARTICLE XVII. NOTICES All notices, requests, demands and other communications which are required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given upon the delivery or receipt thereof, as the case may be, if delivered personally or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, as follows: a. if to the City, to: City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attention: Community Services Director 760-777-7032 S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 10 of 20 b. if to the Developer, to: JDD, LLC Dale Frank 7825 Southeast 761h Street Mercer Island, WA 98040 C. if to the Artist, to: Manuel Mendoza 79010 Victoria Drive La Quinta, CA 92253 ARTICLE XVIII. INDEMNITY With respect to acts, errors or omissions in the performance of Artist's obligations hereunder, Developer and Artist agree to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, agents, employees, and representatives from and against any and all claims, demands, defense costs, liability or consequential damage of any kind or nature arising out of Developer's and/or Artist's (including either of their subcontractors, agents, employees, assigns or licensees) negligent and/or willful acts, errors or omissions in the performance of Developer's and/or Artist's obligations under this Agreement. With respect to acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the City's obligations hereunder, the City agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Developer and Artist from and against any and all claims, demands, defense costs, liability or consequential damages of any kind or nature arising out of the City's (including its contractors') negligent and/or wilful acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the City's obligations under this Agreement. The foregoing indemnities shall be in effect without regard to the maintenance of insurance coverage for any such loss, costs, claims, damages or expenses. ARTICLE XIX. INSURANCE 19.1 Policies. Throughout fabrication of the Artwork the Artist shall maintain Comprehensive General Liability Insurance, or Commercial General Liability Insurance, including coverage for Premises and Operations, Contractual Liability, Personal Injury Liability (employee and contractual exclusions deleted), Products/Completed Operations Liability, Broad -Form Property Damage and Independent Contractors' ($1,000,000) per occurrence, combined single limit, written on an occurrence form, and such other forms and amounts of insurance as the City may deem necessary or desirable. All required insurance shall be evidenced by an insurance policy or policies (or the renewal or replacement thereof) reasonably acceptable to the City. Developer and/or Artist, as applicable, shall not proceed with any work nor receive payment 14"81 �1 S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 11 of 20 under this Agreement until, among other things, the City has received the appropriate insurance certificates. Artist, prior to completion, shall maintain or cause to be maintained standard all- risk property insurance in an amount equal to or greater than the full replacement value of the Artwork. The Artist's General Liability policy required by this Agreement shall contain the following clauses: "The City of La Quinta and its officers, agents, employees, representatives, and volunteers are added as additional insureds as respective operations and activities of, or on behalf of the named insured, performed under contract with the City of La Quinta. it Prior to commencing any work under this Agreement, Artist shall deliver to the City insurance certificates confirming the existence of the insurance required by this Agreement, and including the applicable clause referenced above. Also, within thirty (30) days of the execution date of this Agreement, Artist shall provide to the City an endorsement to the General Liability policy, which adds to this policy the applicable clause referenced above. Said endorsement shall be signed by an authorized representative of the insurance company and shall include the signator's company affiliation and title. Should it be deemed necessary by the City, it shall be the Artist's responsibility to see that the City receives documentation acceptable to the City which sustains that the individual signing said endorsement is indeed authorized to do so by the insurance company. Also, the City has the right to demand, and to receive within a reasonable time period, copies of any insurance policy required under this Agreement. In addition to any other remedies the City may have if Artist fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City may, at its sole option, terminate this Agreement. City's termination of the Agreement, however, is an alternative to other remedies the City may have, and is not the exclusive remedy for Artist's failure to maintain insurance or secure appropriate endorsements. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Artist may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Artist's, or Artist's respective agents' contractors' or subcontractors', performance of the work covered under this Agreement. ARTICLE XX. GENERAL 20.1 Any provisions of this Agreement which shall prove to be invalid, void, or illegal shall in no wayaffect impair or invalidate an other provision hereof, and such remaining14 `' � P Y P �. provisions shall remain in full force and effect. �- S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 12 of 20 20.2 Whenever in the specifications any materials or process is indicated or specified by patent or proprietary name or by name of manufacturer, such specification shall be deemed to be used for the purpose of facilitating description of the material and/or process desired, and shall be deemed to be followed by the words "OR EQUAL", and Artist may offer any material or process which shall be equal in every respect to that so indicated or specified. 20.3 Artist shall not offer any substitute in said proposal or if a substitute so offered by Artist is not found to be equal to that so indicated or specified by name, if one only be so specified or named, or, if more than one be so specified or named, then such one as shall be specified in the proposal, or if none be so specified, then such one as shall be required by the City. 20.4 Unless a different date is provided in this Agreement, the Effective Date shall be the latest Date of Execution, hereinafter set forth below the names of the signature hereto. Should the Developer or Artist fail to enter a Date of Execution, the Effective Date shall be the Date of Execution by the City. 20.5 The City shall give any subsequent owner of the Artwork written notice of the covenants contained herein, and shall cause each such successive owner to be bound thereby. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first written above. CITY: CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation 0 ATTEST: JUNE GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California THOMAS P. GENOVESE, City Manager City of La Quinta, California 143 S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 13 of 20 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California ARTIST: Manuel Mendoza DEVELOPER: JDD, LLC By: Its: S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 14 of 20 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF DESIGN BUILD SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK 1. Artist shall furnish all labor, engineering, material, tools, equipment, etc., required to design the Artwork in accordance with the quality level and intent of the concept drawings as prepared by Artist and approved by the City, along with all governing agency requirements and code criteria. 2. Developer and/or Artist is responsible for submitting all required documents relating to the Artwork design to appropriate government agencies so that building plan check and all required permits may be obtained in a timely manner. 3. Developer and/or Artist shall immediately notify the City in writing of any cost impact or schedule impact whether increase or decrease, resulting from any modifications to the design. Any redesign fees or any other costs incurred by the City due to Developer and/or Artist's negligence or failure to keep the City informed of scope variances in a timely manner shall be charged equally to the Developer and Artist. 4. Artist shall complete the design in sufficient scale and detail as required by the City and governmental authorities for approval. The design documents shall bear the stamp of a professional Mechanical, Structural and/or Electrical Engineer(s) licensed in the State of California deemed necessary. 5. Artist's design and specifications shall be subject to approval by the City and its consultants. II. GENERAL ITEMS OF INCLUSION: As a further clarification to the plans and specifications, the work shall include but not necessarily be limited to the following: 1. Artist shall examine or cause to be examined all supporting and adjacent surfaces and record any defects to the City prior to installing any material. The installation of any material constitutes the Artist's complete acceptance of all substrates as compatible with the work under this agreement. 2. Any work not provided for in this Agreement must be authorized by the City and Developer prior to the installation of such work. 3. Artist is responsible for all repairs or replacement of any existing property or work which is damaged as a result of the performance of the work under this Agreement. S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 15 of 20 4. Artist shall provide for all unloading, hoisting, scaffolding, and bracing for the Artwork. 5. Artist shall provide all drilling, coring, cutting, fastening, and welding required for the Artwork. 6. Artist shall provide all speciality lighting required to complete the artwork. 7. Developer shall supply all landscaping required to complete the Artwork. III. SPECIFIC ITEMS OF INCLUSION 1. The Artwork consists of: 110 foot curvilinear fountain with 24 inch high outer walls Three circular water fountains of natural stone looking concrete Circular water fountains and art feature walls to be of natural stone tones Circular water fountains will vary in size from 7' 6" to 6' 6" in height The base of the circular water fountains will be wider at the base than the top The circular water fountains will be graduated with the "stair step" effect Circular water fountains to be set at various angles Water to flow down all sections of the textured panels Seating surfaces along the outer wall Multiple boulders to be found throughout the fountain pool Lighting to be incorporated into the fountain, to shine on the circular water fountains Lights to incorporate colored lenses that may be changed throughout the year 1.3.2' S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 16 of 20 EXHIBIT B SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE SCHEDULING: The project will take approximately 60-90 days to complete the fabrication of the Artwork. Work will commence during the month of April 2002 and completed, installed and functioning by July 2002. REVIEWS: There may be one review by the Cultural Arts Commission of the work in progress if the Commission deems it necessary . The project may be reviewed by the City Council as deemed appropriate. S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 17 of 20 EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION PRICE: Basic Contract: Total Not to Exceed SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS: First payment due upon approval of Art Purchase Agreement (25%) Second payment due upon installation of fountain walls (25%) Third payment due upon completion of sculpture (25%) Final payment due upon filing Notice of Completion (25%) $949950 $949950 $239737.50 $239737.50 $239737.50 $239737.50 S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 18 of 20 EXHIBIT D NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR ARTWORK Piece of Artwork: La Quinta Court Art Feature WHEREAS, by that certain Art Purchase Agreement dated , 2001 ("Agreement"), THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation (the "City") contracted with JDD, LLC (Developer) and Manuel Mendoza (Artist) to provide certain "Artwork" (as defined in the Agreement); and, WHEREAS, as referenced in the Agreement, the City shall furnish Developer and Artist with a Notice of Completion upon completion of the fabrication and installation of the Artwork; and, WHEREAS, such certificate shall be conclusive determination of satisfactory completion of the fabrication and installation of the Artwork, as required by the Agreement, has been satisfactorily completed. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto certify as follows: 1. As provided in the Agreement, the City does hereby certify that the fabrication and installation of the Artwork has been fully performed and completed. Any executory obligations pursuant to the Agreement, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference, shall remain enforceable according to their terms. 2. Nothing contained in this instrument shall modify in any other way any executory portions of the Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Agency has executed this certificate this day of 92002. CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation by: S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd Page 19 of 20 EXHIBIT E SITE LOCATION MAP ETA S:\Community Services\Art In Public Places Agreements\Art Purchase Agreement, La Quinta Court Revised.wpd •GPI Page 20 of 20 T a 0 jhf 4 QuAto AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL,/RDA MEETING DATE: March 19, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Technical Traffic Committee Recommendations Regarding Various Traffic Safety Issues Discussed at Technical Traffic Committee Meeting on February 21, 2002 BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Direct staff to install 4-way stop signs at the Avenue 52/Cetrino intersection until the traffic signal is constructed; and Direct staff not to install 4-way stop signs at Jefferson Street/Pomelo intersection; and Direct staff to implement striping and signage enhancements on Avenida Bermudas to improve sight distance on Avenida Bermudas south of Calle Arroba where it simultaneously transitions from four lanes to two lanes and curves southwesterly, and contact the property owner residing adjacent to the curve regarding trimming and/or removal of landscaping in the right-of- way. This action conveys no additional fiscal impact to the City that is not already included or anticipated by the City in its budget planning. None. On February 21, 2002 the Technical Traffic Committee (TTC) met to discuss two traffic safety issues. The first issue on the agenda was a discussion on the placement of temporary stop signs while the traffic signals are being designed and constructed at the intersections of Avenue 52/Cetrino and Jefferson Street/Pomelo. Both intersections have met warrants for traffic signals, and as a result, the intersections met the warrants for temporary 4-way stop signs until the signals are installed. Therefore, staff brought the temporary stop sign issue before the TTC for its input. 15r T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020319d.wpd The TTC members were divided on whether stop signs should be installed at the Jefferson Street/Pomelo intersection. Lawrence Tai, County Traffic Engineer, believes there are ample vehicle gaps and sufficient sight distance at this location to provide safe access onto Jefferson Street. Mr. Tai was also concerned with the amount of peak hour traffic on Jefferson Street, stating rear -end accidents may be a problem if stop signs are installed on Jefferson Street. The committee members did achieve consensus regarding the Avenue 52/Cetrino intersection and recommend that 4-way stop signs be installed as an interim traffic control measure until the traffic signals are installed. The TTC members found this location to be different in character owing to the limited sight distance caused by the curve in the road. Also, the stop signs would cause less traffic congestion due to the lower traffic volume on Avenue 52. The second issue on the agenda was the discussion of sight distance and its related traffic safety concerns on Avenida Bermudas where it simultaneously transitions from four lanes to two lanes and curves south and west just south of Calle Arroba. Regarding the sight distance and curve safety issue, the TTC recommended that the resident on the curve be contacted and instructed to trim the shrubs in the right-of-way that are contributing to the sight distance problem. The TTC also recommended that striping improvements be implemented to transition the southbound traffic away from the curb and towards the centerline of the street. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Direct staff to install 4-way stop signs at the Avenue 52/Cetrino intersection until the traffic signal is constructed; and direct staff not to install 4-way stop signs at Jefferson Street/Pomelo intersection; and direct staff to implement striping and signage enhancements on Avenida Bermudas to improve sight distance on Avenida Bermudas south of Calle Arroba where it simultaneously transitions from four lanes to two lanes and curves southwesterly, and contact the property owner residing adjacent to the curve regarding trimming and/or removal of landscaping in the right-of-way; or 2. Direct staff to install 4-way stop signs at the Avenue 52/Cetrino intersection and the Jefferson Street/Pomelo intersection as an interim traffic control measure until the traffic signals are constructed; and direct staff to implement striping and signage enhancements on Avenida Bermudas to improve sight distance on Avenida Bermudas south of Calle Arroba where it simultaneously transitions from four lanes to two lanes and curves southwesterly, and contact the property owner residing adjacent to the curve regarding trimming/removal of landscaping in the right-of-way; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. I U0 002W T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020319d.wpd Respectfull bmitted, Ro F. tephenson Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1 . February 21, 2002 Technical Traffic Committee Minutes 008 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020319d.wpd ATTACHMENT 1 LA QUINTA TECHNICAL TRAFFIC COMMITTEE MINUTES February 21, 2002 The meeting of the La Quinta Technical Traffic Committee was called to order at 11:00 a.m. by Steve Speer. No members of the public present. Steve Speer, Senior Engineer, City of La Quinta Tom Hartung, Building & Safety, City of La Quinta Hector Guzman, Assistant Engineer II, City of La Quinta Lawrence Tai, County of Riverside Transportation Rick Neider, Caltrans Operations None. Confirmed. a. Approved Minutes of April 26, 2001 None. l . Discussion of placement of temporary stop signs while traffic signals are constructed at the intersections of. Jefferson Street and Pomelo Avenue 52 and Cetrino The above intersections were planned for signalization in the future. Traffic signal warrants have been met for both intersections and direction has been given to proceed with the construction of the signals. The Technical Traffic Committee is being asked to discuss the issue of installing stop signs at both intersections temporarily until the traffic signals are constructed. TAPWDEPT\Traffic, TM020221Minutes."d Page 1 of 1005 Jefferson Street is a newly constructed six lane arterial street divided with a landscape median. Avenue 52 is ultimately going to be a 4-lane street, and currently has two lanes on one side of the median and one lane on the other side. Jefferson Street and Pomelo: Traffic signal plans have been prepared and approved for this intersection. Low landscaping has been stripped out of the median to create better sight distance. The residents were pressing the City to do something about the newly improved Jefferson Street as speeds have picked up. There have always been three lanes going south, northbound was a single lane until we recently widened the street. With the newly widened street, there are three lanes in each direction, and traffic speeds have picked up making the residents feel unsafe. Residents were concerned that during the high season this intersection would have increased traffic and asked the City to put up stop signs during the interim period until the signals are installed. Mr. Lawrence Tai, County of Riverside Transportation, was concerned with the peak hour traffic crossing over all six lanes. After a field review prior to the meeting, Mr. Tai drove this intersection and felt that there were ample gaps and sight distance was good. With a six -lane facility, there is a concern with rear end accidents. It might be harder for the side street to cross, not knowing whose turn it is. Mr. Rick Neider, Caltrans Operations, said if stop signs are installed, it can get people used to the idea of signalization. The City sent a letter to the developer in January 2002 to proceed with construction of this intersection and the design of the other signal. We should have a signal installed at this intersection in approximately four to six months. The 4-way stop would be installed in a couple of weeks if approved. There has been one collision since the street widening involving a left turn out across Jefferson Street. Visibility of the traffic and the lanes closer to the median is impeded by the traffic in the near lanes. A vehicle turning thinks it clear, while another vehicle is obscuring the visibility of the number 1 and 2 lanes. The roundabout at Avenue 52, which tends to space the cars out so the northbound traffic, is random and spread out during peak hours. This would be the only 4-way stop between Highway 111 and PGA West. Avenue 52 and Cetrino: Avenue 52 has one lane going eastbound and two lanes westbound with a posted 50 MPH speed limit and a curve at one direction. The two lanes going eastbound merge down to one lane approximately 1000' from this intersection Mr. Tai, stated that unlike Jefferson Street, this intersection would be okay for a 4-way stop. Peak hour traffic does not create major congestion. Mr. Neider stated that everyone should be able to see the stop signs at this intersection and it would be safer for visibility. T:\PWDEPT\Traffic, TTC\020221Minutes. wpd Page 2 of 3 - ,! 006 Mr. Speer stated that to help emphasize the stop signs, the City could place advance stop signs, 48", upgrade sheeting with good reflection, and use the median nose as an alternate stop sign location. Crosswalks would help emphasize the fact that something is different. Shrubbery needs to be kept down low. Mr. Neider stated that crosswalks would help, depending on how you stripe them. Vertical bars might further emphasize the crosswalks. 2. Discussion of sight distance/curve safety issue on Avenida Bermudas between Calle Arroba and Calle Chillon. The resident at 53-905 Avenida Bermudas has voiced a concern regarding the curve on Avenida Bermudas between Calle Arroba and Calle Chillon. Avenida Bermudas has two southbound lanes until the start of the curve where it is reduced to one southbound lane. This lane reduction also takes place near the concerned resident. No home exists on the lot directly north of the concerned resident, therefore; sight distance would be reduced if a block wall was constructed when a new home is built. Since a lane reduction takes place without a transition, some vehicles speed up to get in front of the vehicle beside them. Although the vehicles may or may not be speeding, the resident has asked if anything can be done to eliminate or reduce this aggressive driving. There are no arrows for merging. Mr. Tai stated that the landscaping needs to be removed for visibility and take away the lane line and widen the shoulder so the traffic can merge sooner. Mr. Speer stated that the traffic needs to be pulled away from the curb. Mr. Neider felt we should look at the re -striping aspect for maneuvering, make the traffic merge sooner, further away from the driveway in concern. Also, the wider the lane, the faster the traffic will flow, maybe it is too wide. Meeting adjourned at 11:45 a.m. T:\PWDEPT\Traffic, TTC\020221Minutes. wpd Page 3 of 3 "�f COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 19, 2002 Consideration of Funding Request by the La Quinta High School RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: The Special Projects Contingency Account in the Community Services Department budget, Account #101-251-663-657 contains $13,257 which may be used to fund this request. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The La Quinta High School Football Coach, Mr. Dan Armstrong, has requested consideration by the City Council to fund California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) rings for the 2001 Blackhawk football team, as provided in Attachment 1. This item was considered under written correspondence at the March 5, 2002 City Council meeting. The City Council directed this item be placed on the March 19, 2002 City Council agenda. The cost per ring was $151 and 66 rings were ordered along with 10 pennants purchased at $100 each for 10 water girls for an approximate total order of $1 1,900. The following people received CIF rings: 44 football players, 12 coaches, two team doctors, the La Quinta High School principal and three vice principals, one trainer, one statistician, one photographer and one scout. Each student contributed $25 toward the cost of their ring and the football boosters contributed $5,800 toward the cost. Attachment 1 provides various levels of sponsorship that was available for community support. Approximately $5,000 in sponsorships from the community was collected toward the cost of the rings. Mr. Armstrong expressed this funding request to the City Council is to reimburse the amount paid by the football boosters ($5,800). According to Mr. Armstrong, the football team received the CIF rings at an awards ceremony on March 4, 2002. 163 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the funding request from La Quinta High School in the amount of $5,800 from the Special Projects Contingency Account; or 2. Approve the funding request from La Quinta High School in a different amount from the Special Projects Contingency Account; or 3. Do not approve the funding request by La Quinta High School; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respec fully sub fitted, Dodie Horvitz, nity Services Director Approved for submission by: ZXhomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Letter From La Quinta High School Football Coach Dan Armstrong S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.191.Footbal1 Team Request.wpd 0 0 2 Feb 27 02 03:03p LA QUINTA HIGH SCHO( WRITTEN CORRES ATTACHMENT 1 = � t1 E ,tks 1 i �gih NIL Desert Sands Unified School District r December 12. 2001 Dear Mayor Pena, I Would like to take this opportunity to thank you once again for your past support of La Quinta High School Football. Everyone knows we. have the very best fan support and community involvement of any program around. It is because of this community support, , that we have been able to put the very best football team in the valley on the field. Being the first football team in valley history to win Back to Back CIF titles is incredible. It is also a great tribute to players, coaches, and our support staff. that have worked so hard to make this happen. As a reward to them for their tremendous achievement we will be purchasing Championship rings. Many of our players cannot afford the cost of these rings and we refuse to leave anyone out. The total cost of the rings will exceed $15,000.00 We have solicited our area merchants, and now we are asking you and the city of La Quinta to help us with this much deserved endeavor. If you could see your wav clear to donate fluids for these rings it would do a lot to take the financial burden off the kids. We will be starting a sponsorship program that we hope you will want to be a pant of. Enclosed you will find a flyer outlining the tiered system we are promoting. A plaque will be displayed prominently at our gym listing all the donors, as well as the amount and category it fits under. We will also be taking out an ad in the Desert Sun displaying this same information for all to see. In addition any donation you make will be tax deductible as we are a non-profit organization. This football team has been a tremendous source of conununity pride, and it would be a shame if any of these very deserving people were left out because they can't afford it. Again, I hope you will decide to participate in this very worthy cause. Thanki�ZN,,olj in advance for your generosity, Dan Armstrong Head Football Coach/Athletic Director La Quinta High School "Blackhawks" Desert Sands Unified School District 79-255 Westward Ho Drive - La Quinta, California 92253 - (760) 772-4150 Fax (760) 772-4166 - Fax (760) 771-4171 ) 16 t— � A2-27-02 1 3 : 51 RECEIVED FROM : 766 772 4186 P . 01 004 Feb 27 02 03:04p LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL 760 772 4166 p.2 [AckhAwk PRoud SPONSORS ChAMPiMON'S Club $1000 & AbovE if it TouchdowN CLUB $500 & Above Spxaeu lla.ue SA69dow lAv" FiEld GOAt Ctub $300 & Above Spaooaoze ?Zane SAoeauaa 71aHre EXTRA POINT Club $100 &Above SAM44U 714ox Syorraoaa.7laW FIRST DOWN Ctub sio.,sqio SA"dow Z4ote spamw7lake Thanks To. All OF You FOR A ChAmpi*oNShip THAT Will LAST A LIFETIME iG 02-27-e2 13.si RECEIVED Pao„ ,sa 772 4166 P.aa GG5 �� / 17,1_ 199U March 9, 2002 1�nta 1 roill., International Baccalaureate Programme - Ronald & Barbara Perkins 48-213 Calle Floristas La Quinta, CA. 9223 Dear Ronald & Barbara, On behalf of the entire La Quinta Football Team, and myself we would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your very generous contribution to our ring campaign. Because of your generosity and others like you, every member of the team and all support personnel were able to receive Championship rings or pendants. I know that if you boosters had not come through, several of our players would not have been able to afford this great momento of their season. It is very apparent that the La Quinta community takes great pride in our program, but we take tremendous pride in you as well. Our fans and merchants are second to none when it comes to supporting us, and we really do appreciate it! Between the players, parents, coaches, administration, and you boosters, we truly do make a great TEAM! Again, I will never be able to thank you enough, but rest assured that your generosity has given these young people a gift they will remember for a lifetime. There will be plaque displayed prominently in our gym, as well as an ad in the Desert Sun testifying to your generosity. This is the least we can do to show our appreciation for your gift. Thank you again for your tremendous support, /Z-' Dan Armstrong, And the entire La Quinta Football Team Desert Sands Unified School District 79-255 Westward Ho Drive • La Quinta, California 92253 • (760) 772-4150 Fax (760) 772-4166 - Fax (760) '771-4171 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 19, 2002 Consideration of Participation in the Waste -To - Wonders Art Challenge to be Held April 13, 2002, as Requested by S.C.R.A.P. RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: 3- CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: If Council deems it appropriate; $1,000 would be appropriated from the AB939 Community Promotion Fund (101-402-605-542) . CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the City Council meeting of February 19, 2002, a letter was received from the Student Creative Recycle Art Program (SCRAP) requesting assistance with the Waste - To -Wonder Art Challenge to be held in April, 2002. The request was referred to staff. SCRAP is requesting participation in the Waste -To -Wonder Art Challenge. The following suggestions are offered as methods of showing the City's support for the program: Contributions in cash or in kind to the event City's sponsorship and name on 1st prize cash awards ($1,000) Publicize in the City's Newsletter Attendance at the event Appoint a City's representative to the planning or judging committee Currently, there is $10,000 available in AB939 Community Promotion Fund for promoting recycling, that could be directed toward this program should the City Council make that determination. G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\SCRAP.wpd 1 V - FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Authorize the expenditure of $1,000 for City sponsorship from AB939 Community Promotion Fund (101-402-605-542); or 2. Do not participate in the program; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Je54 4jermanj C mm nity Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Letter or request from SCRAP 1) G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\SCRAP.wpd WRITTEN CORRESPI ATTACHMENT #1 Mr. Tom Genovese, City Manager City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Z, Dear Mr. G ovese. c.µhquq(eJLm(4[ Ind;o, CA 92201 (760) 863-7777 As a leader in our community, we would like to offer you the opportunity to partner with us in highlighting artistic talent and providing quality environmental responsibil- ity. The Waste -To -Wonders Art Challenge slated for April 2002 is a valley -wide art competition which encourages both professional, amateur and student artists to showcase their work using found materials. Prizes will be awarded to artists and their work will be exhibited to the public at an exceptional event held at The Gar- dens on El Paseo on April 13, 2002 in conjunction with their World Tour of Wine and Music Concert Series The purpose of this annual event is to highlight the artistic endeavors of valley resi- dents who work with recycled materials and to stress the importance of recycling. The Waste -To -Wonders Art Challenge will present artist efforts in a regional and most public forum. Proceeds from this event will benefit the S.C.R.A.P. Gallery's re- cycling and environmental education program for all students in the Coachella Val- ley. To date, the Waste -To -Wonders Art Challenge has received the support from the cities of Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage, Cathedral City, Indio and Palm Springs. The October 9th, 2001 Desert Sun tells us that only Coachella, Palm Desert and Palm Springs reached their recycling goals of 50% by the end of 2000. Your city's support of this event will help educate and encourage families and businesses to recycle. You can show your support in many ways, such as Contributions in cash or in kind to the event City's sponsorship and name on 1 st prize cash awards ($1,000) Publicize in your City's Publication Attendance at the event Appointing your city's representative to the planning or judging committee Please feel free to call the S.C.R.A.P. Gallery for more details. Sincerely, Karen Riley Executive Director Manly lassman President ----------- The S.CA.A.P. Gallery ;s a 501(c) (3) nonprofvt or$anizalfon Coachella T Valley Artists a ' Artwork Using Recycled 4� Materials jL Call for FREE w M. Materials UVoruter3J�trt te-Eo- l.haCCerege Amateur • Age 19 or older Student • Age 14 through 18 Ca_k,4warJ_i Professional • $1000 Amateur • $250 Student • $100 (3) Caa4AwarcL in eac4 category in eac�i divijion. (12) (._,.aj4Awards in all' The Gardens on El Paseo April 13, 2002 The Waste -to -Wonders Art Challenge is a valley -wide art competition, which encourages both amateur and professional artists to showcase their work using found and recycled materials. Artwork will be exhibited and prizes awarded on April 13, 2002 at the Gardens on El Paseo in Palm Desert. There is no charge for admission. This event is sponsored by local businesses and cities in the Coachella Valley. Proceeds will benefit the S.C.R.A.P. Gallery, (Student Creative Recycle Art Program), an innovative program that brings recycling, environmental and art education to children and their families. It is located year round, at the Riverside County Fairgrounds in Indio. ................................... For more information ' > please call (76o)863-7777 • Also at the Gardens on April 13th • World Tour of Wine and Music Jazz Concert for the I')n5 T a 0 it!t 4 a 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 19, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Discussion of Amending of Section 12.32.120 of the La Quinta Charter and Municipal Code, Regulating the Parking of Commercial Vehicles RECOMMENDATION: PUBLIC HEARING: Do not amend Section 12.32.120 of the La Quinta Municipal Code and maintain the current restrictions on the parking of commercial vehicles in the City. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the February 19, 2002 City Council meeting, staff was asked to bring back the commercial vehicle ordinance for review and possible amendment. In April of 1997, the City Council reviewed this Ordinance and decided not to amend it at that time. Section 12.32.110 (Attachment 1) restricts commercial vehicles from parking within the City unless they are screened from view. Section 12.32.120 provides exemptions and allows vehicles such as pickup trucks and vans that are under twenty feet in length and shorter than eight feet in height to be parked in the City. Standard full size pickups and vans meet the exemption criteria and are allowed to park in the City. Aesthetic concerns aside, there is also a potential noise impact associated with allowing larger commercial vehicles to park within the City. Many of the drivers of the restricted commercial vehicles (plumbing trucks, tow trucks etc.) that have been cited, claim that they have to take their vehicles home at night because they are on emergency standby. This would mean that their larger and louder vehicles are subject to being dispatched in the middle of the night from a residential neighborhood. Staff contacted one of the City's self storage facilities and was informed that the facility had spaces available for commercial vehicles ranging in size from twenty to forty-four feet in length. Monthly rental rates range from $65 for a twenty foot long space to $119 for a forty-four foot long space. The storage facility staff indicated that although the facility is normally only available to its customers between the hours of 6 AM and 10 PM, arrangements could be made for commercial businesses to access the storage area on an as needed basis. Provided as Attachments 2 through 6 are examples of vehicles which are currently restricted from parking in the City and their respective dimensions. Respectfully submitted, —7 ' 47e �_ Tom Hartung, Director of Building & Safety Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. La Quinta Municipal Code sections 12.32.110 through 12.32.130 2. Picture of currently restricted commercial vehicle 3. Picture of currently restricted commercial vehicle 4. Picture of currently restricted commercial vehicle 5. Picture of currently restricted commercial vehicle 6. Picture of currently restricted commercial vehicle ATTACHMENT 1 1232.110 Certain commercial vehicles prohibited from parking on private property and public rights -of -way. Unless excepted pursuant to Section 12.32.120, no commercial or construction vehicle, or towed commercial or construction equipment, shall be parked on private property or on public rights -of -way unless the vehicle or equipment is screened from public view and adjacent properties. The term "commercial or construction vehicle and/or equipment" includes, but is not necessarily limited to, utility body trucks, farming and construction tractors, construction vehicles and towed equipment, semi -truck tractors, semi -truck trailers, dump trucks, step van delivery trucks or any parts or apparatus of any of the above. (Ord. 87 § 1 (part), 1986: Ord. 72 § 1 (part), 1985: Ord. 65 § 1 (part), 1984) 12.32.120 Commercial vehicles exempted from Section 12.32.110. The following commercial and construction vehicles are exempted from the prohibition contained in Section 12.32.110: A. Pickup trucks, utility vans and similar utility vehicles, each of which do not exceed eight feet in height or twenty feet in combined total length; B. All vehicles while being used in actual construction work on a permit -approved construction site; C. All vehicles in the process of making a pickup or delivery; and D. Governmental and utility emergency service vehicles. (Ord. 87 § 1 (part), 1986: Ord. 72 § 1(part), 1985: Ord. 65 § 1 (part),1984) 12.32.130 Violation of Section 12.32.110—Penalty. Any person violating any provision of Section 12.32.110 shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars, or by imprisonment in the County Jail for a period of not more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. (Ord. 87 § 2, 1986) .� r� �� 4 I 20' 2" in length V v ■■ ■ ..�.�. ._ ATTACHMENT 2 ATTACHMENT 3 ATTACHMENT 4 ATTACHMENT 5 ATTACHMENT 6 c` z o` Wanda Wise -Latta -Regarding Council Meeting (19 March) Page 1 From: <SDewane@aol.com> To: LQCity.lgcc(wlatta) Date: Mon, Mar 18, 2002 11:13 AM Subject: Regarding Council Meeting (19 March) Attn.: Mr. Donald Adolph I'm unable to attend the City Council meeting tomorrow (March 19). Please vote against the ordinance allowing all commercial vehicles over 20 feet long and 8 feet tall to be parked in residential areas of the cove in LaQuinta. As a homeowner and tax payer I do not want or wish to see semi's, tow trucks, septic tank trucks parked in front of my home. Please vote against such a horrible/horrible ordinance. Thank You Susan Dewane 53625 Avenida Obregon 760-564-4130 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 19, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Discussion of Trail Alternatives for the Coachella PUBLIC HEARING: Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan As deemed appropriate by the City Council. None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. The regional Trails and Bighorn Sheep Working Group was formed in August, 1999 to assist in the development of alternative trails plans for consideration by participating members in the preparation of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) . The group consists of participating local jurisdictions, State and Federal agencies, Trail User Groups, Building Industry Association, and interested individuals, and is chaired by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Coachella Valley Mountain Conservancy. The purpose of the trail alternatives is to provide an array of strategies for consideration of one acceptable Trails Plan for inclusion in the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. The objective of the Trails component is to provide trail access and use in the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains while ensuring recovery of the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep population. The BLM has prepared a summary packet: " Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan - Trail Alternatives" (Attachment 1) for review and discussion. Although the Working Group will continue to meet and consider trail issues and assist in the implementation of the adopted plan, the majority of the group's effort is complete. Respectfully submitted, ,rry Herm2'n om unity Development Director Approved for Submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Summary packet: "Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan - Trail Alternatives" ATTACHMENT #1 Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Trails Alternatives City of La Quints Trails Alternatives Meeting Contents of Summary Packet 1. Trails Plan elements affecting the City of La Quints 2. Two -page Executive Summary of Trails Plan Alternatives 3. Eight -page Summary of Trails Plan Alternatives 4. History of Trails Working Group Meetings and Jurisdiction Representation 5. Map of Preliminary Trails Plan Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Trails Alternatives City of La Quinta Trails Alternatives Meeting Contents of Summary Packet 1. Trails Plan elements affecting the City of La Quinta 2. Two -page Executive Summary of Trails Plan Alternatives 3. Eight -page Summary of Trails Plan Alternatives 4. History of Trails Working Group Meetings and Jurisdiction Representation 5. Map of Preliminary Trails Plan 16 La Quinta Trails Plan Elements - March 11, 2002 Trails Plan Elements Affecting the City of La Ouinta (As proposed in Alternative B of the Draft Trails Management Plan) Trails affected by Seasonal Trail Area closures: • Boo Hoff (excluding the Lake Cahuilla to La Quinta Cove connector trail, aka Morrow trail). • Bear Creek Oasis Trail • Bear Creek Canyon Trail (excluding non-BLM segment in T6S, R6E, section 13) • Guadalupe Trail Trails remaining open year round with no restrictions: • Segment of the Boo Hoff Trail extending south from Lake Cahuilla to the eastern boundary of the Santa Rosa Wilderness Area • Segment of the Bear Creek Canyon trail in T6S, R6E, section 13 • La Quinta Cove to Lake Cahuilla (includes the Morrow Trail and a portion of the Boo Hoff trail). Implementation • Seasonal Trail Area closure will be phased in as new perimeter trails are constructed (note: feasibility of perimeter trails currently being evaluated) • Proposed Phase III perimeter trail construction o West side of La Quinta Cove o Western flank of Coral Reef Mountains • Two years to implement perimeter trails after which time Seasonal Trail Area closures will be implemented. • The Voluntary Trail Avoidance program will continue while perimeter trails area being constructed. • Effectiveness of the trails management program will be reviewed annually by the Management Committee, to be made up of representatives of all signatories of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species HCP/NCCP. Modifications to the program and/or implementation strategy may be undertaken by mutual agreement of the Management Committee. Cross-country travel • Prohibited in designated critical habitat January 1 — September 30. • Allowed outside Seasonal Trail Areas from October 1 to December 31. • Allowed year-round outside designated critical bighorn sheep habitat. Camping Dogs • Prohibited in designated critical habitat January 1 to September 30 and allowed from October 1 to December 31. • Allowed in developed areas (e.g. residential areas, campgrounds, picnic sites) except where otherwise prohibited. • Allowed south of La Quinta Cove outside designated critical habitat. • Allowed, subject to existing regulation, outside designated critical bighorn sheep habitat in the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains. 18 Z), La Quinta Trails Plan Elements - March 11, 2002 New Trail Development • Prohibited in Seasonal Trail Areas • Allowed in identified corridors. • Perimeter trails will be available for year-round use Trail Reroutes • Trails will be rerouted, where biologically meaningful and feasible, to protect sensitive wildlife habitat or other resource values. • Trail specific data pending. Trail Decommission and Removal • Redundant trails, identified through a separate Trails Implementation Strategy, will be decommissioned and removed in designated critical bighorn habitat. • Outside designated critical bighorn habitat in the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains, trail decommissions will be addressed on a case -by - case basis. Non-commercial, Noncompetitive Organized Group Activities 0.- 04 Q 7 O Q O 0 O O C PIN «S O f, CA � ., � O O .1 Cd 0 _ 7,! U CMcc, 0 Cd Cd : k.. .b �3 �C) co D Q O 0 s., 0 s., O U U c* - �► O a? -• -fl c N .b M O p ao O ap O O C .. �._, O b � cif �. r... U cz cd -'. • "o U ..,� i�l '� }+ r U O ice+ U Cd cl n 'gib 4J,.4 n cn o o d) o v� a) 0 (Z. O �n >, a v� 0-4 o 4 U O .. � U O cqs Cd cn pa cd 0 3. Dap >, O co >, >t a `�' a O � i > ti" v 03 �.d a" m. oo •cd O Uw Uw N _a ,�M cl •� aUn �c ° o o M C o c M .. cz O U O O> N p �� ct -� u CIS c � V U aa CZ W cz E -o o j 3�apam) -Cc, 3.0 O a an co u a c ap co 0 �.Wa.co U 3 � U-v 18r a c w• � �, �• � o 0 O o c CA ,.D ... �. ara ~ C � , n CD cr � ?: ??, cn � a- c �.. ar CD �. cn t ;� cs ,0 c, O "0 b � a w CD b CD �. f-f. a OQ CD C o O ai p� O En p A� O �. c� O ''d ,Y n cD '{, cD '••h fv O 0--�o .w. C a'a Z A cra ° 0 �• i c CD CD w CD CD CD d CD CD CD y a CD a CD o cu a '—' CCD n~ OQ CD 0 0 0 0 0-0 O c `. ivCD �-, ~ O W N �, . 0O cn ° 0 CD p W CD CD �' < W..n CD O" 4 0 p CD 3 a� O CD n CD CD : 0 0 y y 0• a C p a °w; � o o CD CD � Q-CD r o cu CD CD r, y CD CD CD Z 4. o c� o a Q- CD ° ° n ►o a 0 CD Gd . �. w a CD o � �' CD o 0 � � coCD ►� CD O -, o �. a• � o CD PO 0 CD CD o CD 0 -' �n ►aCD C; 0 ' CDcD� o 0 o o 0 0 o >' CD CD �- a e 0 CD r+ CDCD &nCD CD qq CD CD CA a' r (A r+ CD 0 a CD CD r cuCD CD `b a CD a' p CD � p `r� 'c CD CD w o r+ " Ova ° tri CD O ' CD a� Co Co�� t� ,�,��',�• tea. o w ocn CD � a COOD CD CD CD � cr o r CD w a1 CD CD a > > w o Ia. CD CD CD CD W CD d o � � CD � a. 0 0 a CD a a °' C 0• H W CW7 H a d W O T �O, �� ° y O O F � U > c y U c � ! y r. •:: y > y y O . U aXi 'C C L' m OL c^ � a C cd N , ^ % ►.�, �:►� y` = as C p • � a., �.. s E u L v y �.- 0 0so°o0 U �� Oc R G O u z s cc .. ° y y ° c o b Q. • V '3 a� .,o � re il-� co tw to 0 c. � � � c '� � Z � a � u y c E 'v, � `a co cr. c s °�' E y y E c t C y 3 w i v v a " E �° a� E c, ai C .p a� T y CL ° 3 00 w A a� ea C O Cq U L co .O 7 qs fA O ~ �`" O y G. rn w M o F" a��+ N a p c0 o y c `~ `o - C* rA � w _ y_ a� �, 6> y E E to U c i y .. S c y ¢, ° E " o a�i >' r o y CL > ° y zv°�i�n ¢ 2 a�, � E U¢-�� 3 auE vi.��vw ts.n.� E U.c�nL1 w Co~ a� «a N 4p vOi G. i n C o 'a 10 ea.o c E•. o L G CAa� a c in.c o °> 0 3 c Ca...Ca E r C O¢ U�+ :+ cs y v G CO .a°D N o O .+ of O O ,� cn o � o cc 0 E 60 > o y aci o >00 >°' o 1� N O O d4 Fri f1y0 ((p� t. g A ti M b 0 O A cn O ti _=CO CD �� A co _ (9 "CSO p7 t9 e9 -t ? N �O O A 0 7 e�^D w `< yCL" ti • �' O C3. � . �, A C. ,� y W In T3 O O' • ca y ti G L7 S �. A y O CD O p ^ O o A (9 A. x �' po O O� Oco K n dCD m O OTI pD a Al _ S eD eDCD n =. m co O fl 0 O w O A O G. O� O W A p o Z7 cn G e) y .A-. L7 t3 M F O CO O A p� Cr G ,,., CD eD w 0 'a .0co j. p lD O• f9 eD C L 02 � `�� A (� w dq rA o � A �. < Q � z 0 �+ = w A Oa A (D 0 ,p DoC O A� '•t (9 : 0 cD .p.� 7 T3 to •Y "p"Y O W (n A y "C7 0 � .-. S CD <• - S ww 'A a. � � O = -+� w = �' �. ��..�yy o Cy 'A-. Q+ f� w 8 p F -e A 0 0 0 a. A eo eb y y -� A3 _ A 3 dQ G. y p �. w CZA y: c O wo n v1 p. y y v w y w A 'Ao or Q- '. D (D fD 0 ? f9CD .� 00 -- y �— S C ..y O+ WOt (D � co -0 a.�.��° � �'v CO CD �o CD co er �' O W 0.0 a y� a o CD 0. a~ C cr _ (D :0-4 ? � C D' A A PAD G. teD A O y eD 7 toco it c O. A A A caD ( o = y 0 m f�D a 0 W H pD G7 O A �i by fo fy y so to M m ¢ k o (yp 3 y � CD CD �+ �• �• 00 x fn• 0 w ua cd V1 N = pQ .� C c �y rn a �' 0D .M CL u to CL CA m -D tA ci U i u _O U ccu U00 OU�=a Ocl OL � Ei C E'n cV0 u E L c0 � L y N��• C s p C CL to cO O �• O •��. z Q Q �<... aim U L •_ O ... U V 2p E co U y O Z ti c U cn O �n p o a O L C 0 4) Z o`oam Q. v°io° °c to rr > p O CL E T3 C p G) O c C. E o > H '!! = s N? U O•O 2 v L y_ w O U O L U n a�i E ,'•�.� CO CO U «. � .O c.� ^v — w y :o I.U. -� G> � y � C> ^.4 .� -r. y bIo U ' x O. E N .O > O y C: .. O c~o a`�i � O '+- �-' :d Q� u Q' :�• •� � '� � .� y as ,� o .n Cy y ti U— «i 1 W 00 v O HCA = E cc y E Qf O Y O '= O >' a+ CJ V C b y 0 C L y bo G t� C L3 O y U L 'C7 O Q L C y 6� y C •G y ' E U c�0 O t O L -C eC O o yCO it R -0 E A� �� >+ c b v :6 u f- E 2 0° ti E = C O O E E m �toai �L' •w� U3 CL O ° p rn 0 V'c`v°O G U E CC4L E- y xy ,^3 aC2L a. �. Oca ° OO C Qn 0 Z U cq Z .00 E c E rn o O y O c° a�i ;C cs aC°i u y L y 3 �' •v O a r>A L 'o 3> LCO � oo aU E y>° ytiyc°aa 0 C � r> C C A E'.:� . E p O E 1 � L 00 cc ° y as ° rn ¢ E 15 _ E v R O z, oo o u E o o= c — ^o c c`�i °=_ •= GL c� a va y o..> �, - M E oo E Z o E a E 'o o E O w L c L' a a C a�i 3 a •� = ai =, /i1�' c°> '= v� •E w a°i ,° °c ,n v�Qi .L k y .. 7E. O E ..M E C1. C w O O L C O w N E to 03 Q A ` � O .g!° EQ Q �. °' °°E mv, x co a) U• A= " ed F, �o C4 u L E L Eom w Z' u >, O � -o E. °_ .c' o ° v .° Z v a• v a o y .� rn +- C c E a. o o E o ° aci y a ^O c P° o Z ao 2 Z oo 3 �n cz 3 cc o rA c o a °• y CL CO to co ca ♦r O c0 ca 7 1 O E EA bo C E o 6 6. o f E w ca Cn :�' " L O u> t� Y y 0 t/� .� • c> O° Q• E GO c00 N .S y N ..i O E C ,= p C 7 0 m E y •y Ca H N _ _c y .> z o E$ a ao a° E 0 L O G w N rA 1^r ... 0 rrXP. 4r V' '� O C E 4 OG y O y, .a L O E x O �. y N ^ E— O U cn U :E ` Ixa.• U ... y o � •� ° c� a u c u U O O :; C: E v¢i M A 3 0 n .A�. O= f~wD O °b s 3 Qi 'n .Q y n. m m CD [- O O m S 0 O 3d • y _ S S o o �b in N O .� ° A n CD O C 10 C. O �n • A n. c� CD p G OOQ UQAcO -i y C3 d ry �< �: A A N CD a a� O p� ty N A c c c g o. a (D N. A. 'C7 O n A a. -0 �_ ry N rD � co CD y ° � � (D � ca = � < Fa 0 °< p `� � � � O A J 3 co CD o a , C7 A_ w co CD w O e AElCD c c o Cr! . P7 c O OQ n. CAD < O O (D bc0 n, BCD G. A CJ' <. A eCan < < n • '�"'. y..' n• p' �, cro �•, O O w A .d•. CD ..,:,.,, v cn c Q w s� 3v -n fD p •c „d Ssa20 z a� z CD A -* .rA» a�-� = o o �� y A ob <.� y '3 •� A `.t fD y d p A 67 n (D '10 CD ^v f1 0 CD a. L` Q A w a O y• cn O ca- O Vl O O Z' (D QQ cr y am. n C9� 9 O m O O _.._.:. ^ M. U CS II CD .» co O O ~' CD `< <' O. tz C O fD 3 eNp Q. arl S G. �oo m (tpi O N Q N fD N ? h CL ^ AD CD Q' A' C n- A . c o< �' y°- f D o' b -, < c w O 'o rs A c o S o lsj . fD N p c ti fD C ti T3 y• ~O A• y O A (D A o co c, O to p ... w y O �-p, Fv a tp a r;3r CD �'_' y (D (D �-' CD m`_ cn . .A� n O A 3 D 9A C =n UQ cana O O cP y. v N < VO -sO. p (D O o °' .- c o O a. c o c iD 'o o c 3 co o C� <0_ Chi . O cD t-4 S' T co A (IQ A "4 < < S m eon O y "! lD e cs y= AC1Q nO ( c co O y r1Di, vci ? '�•t ?. fD CD T3 � '77 'C:f AD to A v� PD Z N A As z ci A 'O O 3 w (AD w fD c •ti < A 0 < CD CD (A ^' c 0 QQ w ^ n" . p� a. < 'rf A O �y ^ `< ° n co << �, CD (D o- a �-+ i fND c .(N9• e~p Cl. O 3 -, a .i a. A_ O. _ S O e9 O C9 (5 CD p O C fD .y W n OQ p0 y p O N c �' -� 3 (�0 cD �. a �. o eD O ACD S M N A .7R. O co A a. m ^• CD O y w O 9 0 n CCDQ' �^.. S � < _03 y tto- 7 ^ ^ O O. y. D p co' ° �. _ OQ co E.0 �. CD ° 3 co .�. 7 O y cD o� C CDz 3 • _ a; ° 'c3 O 0� c° A y CD p a' co O nD co (� in' (wD H .» p O M �.,. .�...• CD M .^.. y A .y O is A S O w < O m p CD VdJ C�~p5 y QQ y c A• A c= CD y CD OtO (p p N ryw 3�.. Fv 3 chi " A c r"y ��°a Sao �. • w ��►� �D CA (AO V CO `0MCD cD O n A• 'C3 y r► O CD n A C CD a ?? f9 O g O rrF ~ ,f9p w R (D N O' .Aj �• r' gR a p' ,, C lD (D n. y O C O• <. O O CA O O CD � y O c O •L O � y O 3 � a� � . � .+ Q 6roi ^:� I�ci., V. ar '° O U '7 Ca C VJ = i Nl y U = O V y w U w L b y 'cC "_ A5 C N ees O ca y co v 00 N y w N 3 fl w y e6 Q C J cocc 'y, '2 2 a > y p E O O y y O0 Gz U. ca W O. U • �.. _ C O > C C Ca t C U co u a ._ on f W ro u ' w _ Q 'L > ^ > y 1 4- y y G fl O O N y _ Q v,' O y O 0 N N y`" ccy y CC6. co "r• E O O z O E E y V W w y H = .R >, v t C O cc cl c M0. ,-; c � c ua E �'E s p y y y� •� �� •p C u Q m 00 R O rL+ 0.1 p y O C cp O y C. cj.. co N a C• 7 O V Ct w N .� N G cd y > d0 N ylc p.O^C ca a> E p O cc45� O O w O o O 0 U cc¢ E W b y w N C co w. w y >,^ y .0 o O C C c0 w�'��o. w C c' cc 8.3>^ uL E yE O GL as > 'O ab .O soc3 y O "Ci 1 NO vR w is Ix ie W > > omi cc E —0 L> O C :•C "U Q. �^m :O a UOG.. wCM 00 co O COrA OO > ceO O co fY o > 2 c .�CLO �oyo = y L. C > e g G. cc .� .= a co c �' L� C3 p = E a=i wCc vi C 3 p¢> = 0. � w y 10 �^' U E v O; �j :+ y ? y v O -p C ,,•i' cn ,O w Uy cc t C «+ c0 �, w CL y E O w U O C O w >, N w y O y b E In Q C GJ V :. `o Qi Ipr i+ i'r .p X b0 0 0 co t� w 0 0 s c� c U a 3 a'co o G 0 a a: rs •OO a r— Q w s ... V-� �J R2 < CJ 'Ci < C CD (D C c lD < S S, (2 A "'A -.� y y y w A (A 'b W s 3 7d n �. -t -•+ Jn S S (D co A A fD p Cld co O O 0fD Qq ryp{ A) .n H (fi N Q' d . _S _�; O y O A O O A A S C C Z. gr O fJ0 (D O W .O 7 O �• fDco v l9A�7 5 C3. t9 Q' O y ca 21 (D C C lD vi p "'""� n fD C G y O • S 0 C � "a S fD Q O ryq 0 S y d 0 � �. CI• n(9 � "' � � (D � p O G. (o � (D � C. V l� p .•' �' O m A _— _ d° c? cD k^ O o Cs CO CACD ID co y •� UAO (D O C. y '— O A• O A A G1, O n (D • C DO -A•t m a' C fD a A 'Aa W • T3 O CD M W p A A A Q y Q l9 C n O. C N y y Z cSD '» O Q C3 00 a ?; m +- a co O O p p O C. C `� a. O a.CD co 0 m �y m y O _ A C7 r co ft3 rA rA A r. <CD a o W A > l7 C th : � m zd .r►.: � N .z . . CD �.CL; ap�� C OCL A` O rb .rrA A . lb O 0" Q A G. O 'ti Te z •, 4 ��,, �; Y � Y 1 < w CD�eO-op 4. 3y oCD74, x; El 47Q (D �_. O fD CD O .t OQ pI CD !ND p• N N_ �p,0 ' O N !n S S H 9 <a� 0 !n nOCD tzfi �Q n � CD C y D _ n o O rn• 0 y CDlD "O O °' A CD a (D p a o w N 7D ri 0- 'C3 y` G cyDm C Q G. O S_ m PO r\ ._.• W ... T. v J K :.�. F; IA" V. y .. 'CCo z v: z Nf Qq Hofer = rya �.. 113 e f • 1 ~ x + i �4�`i�O.. yo: i2": '_� W .a l 1+r,cb Y � �oN A cv Ca 7 C A � cv y b0 • CrC Q •C aso� CO G C y - O •b -C7 N y U c -EG iyr O E C> C 0 t O 5 O C _ to rq O M y R Obi H Y C O E ato =¢E rA COT c •> t� E a �r > ri l0 Ix of E m a� rn Q Q Vf 0 cc H y u u 0. 00 o .� O .cc Cc L E H M c Rf M N o a= 3 c. � ar4 Do �3co a= M -- '= 3 0 .b a A r O U 4) ci y O O N C E" y- C 0 0 'b O O> C'ei >. a 1 d edcc C 00 :+ C w 0 vi p 3 �n EQ 0 y G i�•• 3 U J V p�.» O G O E S N y vl Cyr p V1 1�� 'a m ooy � iw w cr O �' °a f o rD c Q �' a. *^. 0 co 03 co ca t3 w CS. < y .0 G. ry d of Di O O N �°p' �, P.P. O �1 vi O 3 O V] A OQ N y 0 C. fD n m c `a o 0 0 C7 n ti N M. O to O CACS N C1 O n O S C. C CA. n . j. a O O to y N W O ro N a- O < s co O tNo p m O Li J eD s C. p i> > G f G1 O f9 '•. s O 'O CD C As W Q y s eD to P� O O O N 'C o. c m m� o c cn d OOQ' a: _ CC- j o_ OQ y• cc ao s o. �, o C. eD eND N [1 OQ v+ 3 (D LY 7 C1 co ElC].. 'p LY 0. !n � • � p1 7 3 y C<D N O 7 O O- C1 N (IQ N eD tv N A� W iD fD (GD Q ' *+ — n O cD W '. s n Vn `< V] s O e9 eD A . N c< C� 3 cs o c 3 0 t�op y O (IQ Q O � (D 0. !9 N " m 0 Al fD +€ A O p m A a✓ a 0 CD `< n �a s s w O CD ei O C O n eD L d a. N CS. p' n o w 3 n �'. �• N C 0 C. CCD y 7' a N �' (D L7 A O\ 3 m cD << o , Cr eD -- • ;C7 O C.w cOD O 0 wvv"� R.oO0 sv+ co CD N N m °- a\ CD 0 O w d `� .''., < � a cr o r �uQ v� coa ° �wOQm w a'a.:OO►�yyyyy..{� f)• (D (A �1 p 0 8 c X -• o p 00 �l O (� OQ dL +►EEO' Q 00 CL o to fD p O p l9 • /b .A.. r Q .f. H H c� p Ar co D O f9 • A Ow N OG 7 f�D O ? CL D OVZO A NeDID CD ca .0 V miy & d S t iD eD O a' O •``� '' CD CO m a CD COQca �f c 0 CD c Rst��, cD a m eD to A eD t; N 03 S C• t9 (7 Cn' CL y 0. y N.Of GAO K e OID N Cl. A > O A y 7' • CY lD A 'Si CD CD =rCD co CD ° m eD ° N �' r A7 � � CA N 0 co Q C J EVOLUTION OF TRAILS PLAN ALTERNATIVES Trails and Bighorn Sheep Working Group meetings: August 19, 1999 September 30, 1999 November 4, 1999 November 23, 1999 December 16, 1999 January 13, 2000 February 10, 2000 March 9, 2000 March 30, 2000 April 20, 2000 • July 11, 2000 — PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING, CATHEDRAL CITE' • August 8, 2000 — ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT, CVMSHCP October 5, 2000 July 19, 2001 F Periods of Tcail7se = '. Date Concept 09-30-99 Restrictions are trail specific, though two distinct broad categories of trails are defined: (1) trails at issue during the lambing season; (2) trails at issue during the lambing and water stress seasons. Alternatives address periods of trail availability by months of the year, days of the week, and hours of the day. 01-13-00 Same as 09-30-99 except limitations imposed by days of the week are no longer considered. 02-10-00 Same as 01-13-00. 03-09-00 Two scenarios are considered: (1) trail specific management as previously addressed; (2) trails management by area with 4 areas established —all trails in one area would generally be subject to the same management prescriptions. Alternatives address periods of trail availability by months of the year and days of the week; limiting use by hours of the day is no longer considered. 03-30-00 Same as 03-09-00. 04-20-00 Same as 03-09-00 except certain alternatives additionally address periods of availability by hours of the day. 07-1 I-00 Same as 03-09-00 except trail management is by area only; trail specific management is no longer considered. 08-08-00 Same as 07-11-00. 10-05-00 Same as 07-11-00. 07-19-01 Same as 07-11-00 except alternatives address periods of availability only by months of the year; limiting use by days of the week and hours of the day is no longer considered. jW yYz . S Y at mt PI � �H `> cP>'<9ai:5•IlCw %+yrs : v T{ Z. Cr. Date Concept 09-30-99 Under certain alternatives: limits on the number of individuals and groups are identified; permits are required for individuals and groups under alternatives establishing maximum levels of use. Non-commercial guided use is addressed. d 1-13-00 Same as 09-30-99. 02-10-00 Same as 09-30-99 except allowances are made for educational groups, and non-commercial guided use is not addressed. 03-09-00 Same as 02-10-00. 03-30-00 Under certain alternatives: limits on the number of groups are identified; permits are required for groups under alternatives establishing maximum levels of use; permits for individuals are not required. Allowances are made for educational groups. Non-commercial guided use is not addressed. 04-20-00 Same as 03-30-00. 07-11-00 Same as 03-30-00 except permits for both individuals and groups are required under alternatives establishing maximum levels of use. 08-08-00 Same as 07-11-00. 10-05-00 Same as 07-11-00. 07-19-01 Under certain alternatives: limits for the maximum number of groups are identified; permits are required for groups only; permits for individuals are not required (voluntary permit for individuals from 10/1 to 2/14, Art Smith Trail only). Non-commercial guided use is not addressed. iv� V Othe'r"IsWeS Issue Date Addressed Y/N Date Addressed Y/N Date Addressed Y/N Date Addressed Y/N Dogs 09-30.99 YES 01-13-00 YES 02-10-00 YES 03-09-00 YES Cross-country travel N N YES YES Camping N N YES YES Motorized vehicle use of trails N N YES YES New trail development N N YES YES Non -motorized commercial use YES YES YES YES Motorized commercial use N N YES YES Competitive events YES YES YES YES Trail maintenance N N N N Trail rerouting YES YES N YES Development of water facilities YES YES N N Trail removal N N N N Murray Hill facilities N: N N Dunn Road maintenance N N N N C) 0=4 Other Issues r ... �. i:; i-. .,� i.Cy f ... it ^� K�y ♦-. ': � � w:.i (ConHhued) Issue Date Addressed Y/N Date Addressed Y/N Date Addressed Y/N Date Addressed Y/N Dogs 03-30-00 YES O4.20-00 YES 07-11-01 YES 03-03-00 YES Cross-country travel YES YES YES YES Camping YES YES YES YES Motorized vehicle use of trails YES YES YES YES New trail development YES YES YES YES Non -motorized commercial use YES YES YES YES Motorized commercial use YES YES YES YES Competitive events YES YES YES YES Trail maintenance N N N - Trail rerouting YES YES YES YES Development of water facilities N N N N Trail removal N N YES YES Murray Hill facilities N N N N Dunn Road maintenance N N N. YES Other Issues (Continued) �. Issue Date Addressed Y/N Date Addressed Y/N Date Addressed Y/N Date Addressed Y/N Dogs 10-05-00 YES 07-19-01 YES Cross-country travel YES YES Camping YES YES Motorized vehicle use of trails YES N New trail development YES YES Non -motorized commercial use YES YES Motorized commercial use YES YES Competitive events YES YES Trail maintenance N YES Trail rerouting YES YES Development of water facilities N - N Trail removal YES YES Murray Hill facilities ; N YES Dunn Road maintenance YES YES 2 (, I -71 � o► t I; d k k k k .LL v► g` X X X k k k w >s O" k k �x c k k k X k k k rr j m X X X X X k X X ml X X X + X X X X k k k k k X k k k MM. X X k k k k >C k >t k . rM X X X X X X X X X X X X w _ � •� e �� .. L a a L y a� e L m E w 3 " •� a d w .04 L ai V •fj = i= O O O O O p Q{ LQ V w h ai C• r"i i > > •i �+. 41 y •-L y bD U 00 d CA L C6 ,� O Q W U Q U U cz F• U U U U U U Q o U G 0, 7 v> > U U � � F U a �CA F- W a s cv >C X X . N W—P i< X X X X r �h<at X X X X '€ N. a c IS "'.0 N o X X X X x mu X X X X X s X X X X X X ficflacl.' awl X X I X I X I o�' ,., X X X X X -rT'�POtr. X X X X X X # L ff r4. ,k . 4, v w X X X X X X X X X a..trF � c--•... X X X X X X v � .] L •� C •C C L L +�i � a'r h O y 'fl � `r aCi O bD Q. u •• CD o Q �3 z o A A :� 'u i L oCL. O v > O 7 °0 O to ar a+ ai pi L a� C OD U C7 m m Q C V1 G -, a F F cc m C F Z Gzl OrAG >w" _ O u o F U< o REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: OF City of La Quinta/Desert Sands Unified School District Ad Hoc Committee February 27, 2002 11:00 P.M. Executive Conference Room Present: Gary Tomak„ President, School Board Tina Godecke, School Board (Sitting in for John Benoit) Dr. Doris Wilson, Superintendent Terry Henderson, Council Member Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Dodie Horvitz, Community Services Director The following items were reviewed, based upon the meeting notes of the January 4, 2001 Ad Hoc Committee meeting (attached): 1. Use of High School Pool: The La Quinta High School pool is heavily used during the summer months by school programs, therefore unavailable for recreational swim. 2. Dances: The La Quinta High School Associated Student Body offers dances for students. The students have expressed a desire to have dances without adult supervision. Neither the City or Desert Sands is interested in providing unsupervised activities. 3. Retrofit of High School Football Lights: City staff has been working with Terry Parker of the District on the adjusting of the football stadium lights. Musco bid the job at $1,000 to complete the adjustment. After they began the job, they realized that the job had been underbid and only completed half the work. Dr. Wilson will check the progress of the job and the closure of the contract. (Since this meeting, staff has been contacted by Mr. Terry Parker of Desert Sands. Five of the six light poles with fixtures have been adjusted. Mr. Parker evaluated the sixth light pole and determined that there was no significant impact to the community from the light fixtures on that pole, and therefore has signed off on the contract for the light adjustment.) 4. Tennis Court Lights: The City would be interested in funding a portion of the lighting of the High School Tennis courts, to be used by the general public when the school is not using them. Issues such as maintenance and cost of lighting would need to resolved. 21 1 5. Community Resource School Concept: New schools are being designed to allow access to the restrooms by public groups. However, due to the maintenance of the restrooms, groups wishing to use the restrooms during events such as soccer or baseball practice are required to pay for the custodial service. Youth groups have reported that the cost is prohibitive for their use. 6. Library Use: City staff reported that the District provided a letter of support for the La Quinta Library program. 7. Saturday Excursion Programs: City staff reported that excursions are provided through the Community Services Department and flyers are sent to the schools. If teachers want to promote the excursions to their students they may do so. 8. Summer Employment: City staff reported that the Work Coordinator has been contacted at the High School, flyers and announcements have been sent out, and yet, the City has not received interested students to fill the jobs. The position available is the Recreation Aide job, in which a student does not need experience, just a willingness to learn the job. Dr. Wilson will post job flyers. Ms. Henderson stated that the La Quinta Historical Society is looking for docents, which would give students good experience. 9. Internships/Job Shadowing: Mr. Genovese reported that the City supports management staff to participate in community activities in which they address students and explain their professions to students. 10. Field Use by Sports Groups: This item was addressed in item #5, with the issue being the cost involved with public groups paying for the use of the restrooms. 11. ' Youth Workshop: City staff gave a report that the Youth Workshop has been modified and is now being offered each month at the High School. The City and District rotate the supplying of pizza and sodas for the students each month. The students are responsible for arranging the agenda and leading the meetings. The students are learning about the City processes needed to accomplish tasks. 12. Triangular Adoption Program: Mr. McIntyre is contacting the 29 Palms Marine bases to see if they are still interested in participating in the program with Adams School. New Items: 13. Community Park Design: District staff would like to be notified when road construction at the Community Park begins so that they can modify their bus schedules and/or routes. Mr. Genovese reported that the City is looking into placing delineators along the low water crossing on Adams Street, to better define the walk area from the roadway. Mr. Genovese also reported that the temporary sidewalk from the Saguaro/Sagebrush area to Truman/La Quinta Middle School has been completed. 2diJ t.r 2 14. 201h Anniversary Celebration: Councilmember Henderson commended La Quinta High School staff for their cooperation in the City's 20th Anniversary Celebration as a partner in the fireworks and entertainment aspect of the event. The District suggested a banner be placed on the fence around the baseball field at the corner of Westward Ho and Adams Street advertising the 201h Anniversary, as well as distributing flyers through the schools. It was also suggested that the District could have a float in the parade. 15. It was reported that the District is working on acquiring a new school site near the corner of Eisenhower and Tampico, and it is anticipated this school will be open in the fall of 2004. City staff will provide a brief history of the property to the District so this may be incorporated into historical acknowledgment of the area. Board Member Tomak suggested a monument acknowledging the historical significance of the land could be placed on the school site. 16. Board Member Tomak gave a report regarding the District's consideration of using the land at the south end of the Cove as a school site. Due to the number of boulders in the area, the District felt that construction costs would be prohibitive. 17. It was announced that Board Member Benoit had been appointed to attend this committee, however, due to scheduling conflicts, Ms. Godecke is sitting in for Mr. Benoit. The next meeting for the City of La Quinta/Desert Sands Unified School District was set for September 25, 11:00, La Quinta City Hall. This provides a staff summary of the Ad Hoc Committee meeting between the City of La Quinta and Desert Sands Unified School District and is provided for information and/or discussion by the City Council. Respectfully sibmitted: e Horvitz(C6)4munity Services Director v03 T 0 4t!t 4 4 QUM& January 4, 2001 La Quinta City Hall Executive Conference Room 2:00 p.m. Page One City of La Quinta/Desert Sands Unified School District Ad Hoc Committee Present: Don Adolph, Council Member Terry Henderson, Council Member Tina Godecke, Vice President, School Board Gary Tomak, School Board Member Doris Wilson, Superintendent Charlene Whitlinger, Assistant Superintendent, Facilities Tom Genovese, City Manager Dodie Horvitz, Community Services Director 1. High School Pool: A request by students at the April 2000 Youth Workshop to use the La Quinta High School pool during the summer months: The use of the pool can be explored. DSUSD staff will research the cost of operating the pool and school related functions during the summer months and will provide this information to the Community Services Director. The information will then be forwarded to the City Council for consideration. It is anticipated that the La Quinta High School pool could offer programs to teens and adults, such as scuba diving. 2. Dances: The teens requested dances to be held throughout the year. After some discussion, it was determined that providing little adult supervision at teen dances is not in the best interest of DSUSD or the City. 3. Retrofit of the High School Football Field Lights: Council Members and City Staff have received calls from the residents near the High School regarding the spillover and glare from the football field lights. Brett Marchetti, of Musco, had made a presentation to the City Council on Tuesday, January 2, 2001 regarding the possible lights at the Community Park site. Mr. Marchetti was asked about shields for the lights at the High School. Mr. Marchetti will research the structural integrity of the poles, as his company installed them, and will provide City staff with the estimated cost of installing shields. �/ 4! Ms. Godecke stated that DSUSD would be interested in installing the shields if the City would cover the cost. Ms. Whitlinger would be interested in finding out if there is a energy savings to installing the light shields. 4. Tennis Court Lights: A possible option would be for the tennis court lights at the High School to be fitted with coin operated timers. This would allow the public to use the courts during the evening hours. 5. Community Resource School Concept: Ms. Whitlinger stated that new schools are being designed to accommodate the community after school hours, such as having restrooms that can be opened during non -school hours and near playing fields. 6. Library Use: The La Quinta High School library is open after school for student use. The library is designed to be a student library and not a public library. The library could be modified to accommodate the public by adding additional books. Ms. Godecke stated that the size of the library would limit its use. 7. Saturday Excursion Program: Mr. Tomak asked if the Community Services Department could offer excursions on the weekends to locations and events that could serve as educational excursions. Ms. Horvitz stated the Community Services Department will offer excursions if is a request from the community and participants register for the program. Specifically targeting teachers at the High School to promote the programs would help publicize the excursions. DSUSD staff will provide the names of contact people at the High School. 8. Summer Employment: The High School employees a Work Coordinator that can assist in advertising the City's part time employment opportunities. An announcement can also be placed in the student newspaper. 9. Internship/Job Shadowing: Mr. Tomak asked if the City offered an Internship program for students. Mr. Genovese stated that the City does not have the resources to program an internship, however, the City's Department Director's could be available for presentations regarding their profession. 10. Field Use by Sports Groups: City staff has received information that the youth sports groups have been denied use of school property for practices. Ms. Horvitz will contact the youth groups and get specifics and provide this to Ms. Whitlinger. 20u 11. Youth Workshop: Council Member Henderson invited the School Board Members to attend the Youth Workshop on April 18, 2001 at the Senior Center. This is an opportunity to hear what issues are important to the students and how our organizations can accommodate their requests. School Board Members as well as District staff will be formally invited. 12. Triangular Adoption Program: Council Member Henderson inquired of the Triangular Adoption Program with Adams School. Staff will provide an update when an event is planned. This provides a staff summary of the Ad Hoc Committee meeting between the City of La Quinta and Desert Sands Unified School District and is provided for information and/or discussion by the City Council. ResTctfully submitted: &die Horvitz, 'Cori unity Services Director REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: 15,0 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA February 26, 2002 I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:04 p.m. by Chairman Abels who asked Commissioner Kirk to lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Richard Butler, Tom Kirk, Steve Robbins, Robert Tyler, and Chairman Jacques Abels. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, City Attorney Kathy Jenson, Senior Engineer Steve Speer, Planning Consultant Nicole Criste, Principal Planners Stan Sawa and Fred Baker, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Chairman Abels asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of January 22, 2002. Commissioner Tyler asked that Page 11, Item 9, Condition #2 be corrected to read, "15 % will be allowed". Commissioner Robbins asked that Page 5, be corrected to read, "However, staff found that as noise impacts, that would be generated by the Washington Street and Miles Avenue roadway activities was studied, that to put residential units at this location, it would provide more impacts to residences than it would to occupants of hotel/commercial uses." Commissioner Kirk asked that Page 11, Item 9, Condition #3 be corrected to read, "...up to 30% shall be allowed to be under 1,200 square feet." There being no further corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Kirk to approve the minutes as corrected. Unanimously approved. B. Department Report: None G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 1 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 V. PRESENTATIONS: None. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Addendum to Environmental Impact Report 92-337 (State Clearinghouse No 9701 1055) Site Development Permit 2002-728, Conditional Use Permit 2002-067 and Tentative Parcel Map 30420; a request of Stamko Development Co. for Certification of an Addendum to an Environmental Impact Report for The Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan 97-029 (1997) and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (1998), State Clearinghouse No. 9701 1055; approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a plant nursery/garden center, an auto repair/specialty shop, and an auto service station in conjunction with Retail Building "B"; and approval of a Tentative Parcel Map to create 18 numbered and two letter lots ranging in size from .47 to 19.44 acres, to be located at the south side of Highway 1 1 1, between La Quinta Centre Drive and west of Dune Palms Road. 1. Commissioners noted they had each met with the applicant prior to the meeting to discuss the project. 2. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Community Development Director Jerry Herman presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3. Chairman Abels asked staff to clarify that the applicant had provided more parking spaces than were required. Staff stated that was correct. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. 4. Commissioner Butler asked about the heights of the lights in the parking lot. Staff noted that in the Highway 1 1 1 Shopping Center the lights area 39 feet high; the Auto Center has 24-foot high lights; and Lowe's and Home Depot have 24-foot high lights. Commissioner Butler asked if the lighting standards would have any impact as they would protrude over the top of the trees. Staff stated they would have to comply with the light standards. 5. Commissioner Tyler asked what the zoning was on the strip of land to the east of this project. Staff stated it was the same as this project, Regional Commercial. Commissioner Tyler asked the name of the street as it appears to have two different names. Staff noted the streets would be completed and will follow the G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 2 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 names as they are now. Commissioner Tyler asked about the turning access points. Staff noted the applicant negotiated the turning access points with Caltrans; the City was not involved. 6. Commissioner Kirk stated his concerns was whether or not the current Walmart building would be left empty. This does happen in other jurisdictions; is the City's approach under Condition #84 something that would be enforceable. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated in her opinion it would be enforceable as both the applicant and Walmart have agreed to it. The Planning Commission is being asked to make a finding with regard to the Environmental Assessment Addendum, and it is within the Commission's purview to consider such a condition. Other jurisdictions have struggled with this issue and legal counsel believes it is enforceable. Commissioner Kirk stated that in regard to Condition #84.13 it sounds as if Walmart could provide an option to the City and that would meet the terms of the condition, but does not rule out the opportunity for Walmart to insist that that option require the City not lease or sell to a competitor, which could be a broad range of uses given the number of items and services this Walmart will sell; does this condition preclude that? City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated the option agreement that would be entered into, would have to be agreeable to the City. We did try to negotiate the terms and determined that was not possible for this meeting, so a condition was added that prior to issuance of a building permit, an option agreement that is acceptable and approved to the City would have to be agreed upon. Staff did leave an option for a different type of agreement that would satisfy the City's concern to make sure the building does not become a boarded up building. Commissioner Kirk asked if a sentence should be added to Condition #84.B.i., stating it would have to be acceptable to the City; would that be appropriate? City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated it would be appropriate and that was the understanding. The condition as stated says, "the City and Walmart shall execute..." and to her if it was not acceptable, the City would not execute it and there would not be a building permit. The City would not agree to purchase property for a fair market value and have restrictions on the reuse of the property. 7. Commissioner Tyler questioned why the Commission was considering such an agreement as this would normally be decided by the City Council. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated this is a Site Development Permit and the � Commission is the final acting authority in this case. City 10 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 3 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 Attorney Kathy Jenson stated that if there were an option agreement, prior to issuance of building permit, it would be subject to the City Council approval. There would be no building permit issued on Retail Building "B" if the City were unable to work out an option agreement, or some other type of agreement, that would satisfy the City's concern. 8. Staff noted conditions had been received from CVWD and would be added to the conditions. 9. Commissioner Kirk questioned the 25 signs requested for Building "B", would they be permitted under the current Zoning Code. Staff noted the current Code allows 50 square feet of signage per elevation to the parking lot or street. The provisions of the Zoning Code allow the Commission to grant additional signage. Commissioner Kirk asked what the second largest structure was in the City. Staff noted probably Home Depot or Lowes. This building is approximately 50% larger than either of those buildings. Discussion followed regarding signage. Commissioner Kirk asked about the two accesses along Highway 1 1 1, is this appropriate and does it fit within the General Plan guidelines. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated they do comply. The closest, in access point, is 250 feet from the intersection at La Quinta Drive. Commissioner Kirk asked if staff believed the parking was acceptable from the Zoning Code perspective, with the number of parking spaces proposed. Staff stated it is not an engineering issue, but rather an aesthetics issue. 10. Commissioner Robbins asked if a large shopping center made up of several smaller shops, would they each be allowed to apply for a sign. Staff noted each shop would have its own signage and went on to explain the applicant's sign request. 11. Commissioner Tyler noted an economic study that was contained in the packet, and asked why this was submitted before the applicant has a signed tenant. City Attorney Kathy Jenson noted the City recommended this study be done as part of the Addendum. There is an argument under CEQA that if there are building vacancies that create adverse physical conditions, they can be considered as an environmental impact and the purpose of the report was to investigate whether or not this was a likely scenario. It is relevant to the Commission's CEQA review in �- consideration of the Addendum. U C" 4 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 4 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 12. Commissioner Robbins asked if under CEQA Walmart moved out and the building became vacant it would be a environmental impact. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated that was correct. Under CEQA, a purely economic impact is not considered an environment impact, but an impact that has secondary physical impacts. The creation of vacant run down buildings can be considered to be a physical impact that should be considered. Commissioner Robbins stated that if that building were to become vacant, the EIR would be false and lawsuits could pursue. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated that the question before the Commission is whether or not they are comfortable certifying the Addendum to the original EIR. The original EIR had an economic study that was prepared for it, but a Walmart was not considered. The purpose of this study was to provide the basis for the Commission's consideration on the Addendum as prepared. It is not a mitigation measure but a condition of approval if the project is approved in both the Site Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit. 13. Commissioner Kirk asked if it was not a part of the mitigation measures, what authority does the City have to condition an applicant like this. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated that under CEQA the Commission has the authority to make modifications to the project in order to avoid the issue. A concern was raised and to be sure the City requested the applicant to fund the Natelson Report. Commissioner Kirk stated we are using the CEQA analysis to express our concerns regarding the impacts of the empty building (Walmart), but do not identify it as even less than significant impact because of the economic analysis which suggests there is sufficient demand. What he thinks he is hearing is that the existing property owner, Walmart, may not give up that land to a potential competitor or third party. If that is the case, that would have an aesthetic impact and should be mitigated. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated this is not a Negative Declaration, but rather an Addendum and its purpose is to update an EIR to look at minor project modifications which is what is before the Commission. In order to approve the Addendum the Commission has to verify that the modification and circumstances have not changed from the original project approval or the original EIR within the scope of that original EIR. Commissioner Kirk stated this mechanism does not allow the City the opportunity to identify a significant impact. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated that if the Commission believes that the project as it is before the G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 5 U U J Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 Commission with all the conditions that are imposed on it, if there is a potential for an impact, you would not certify the Addendum. It is her belief that the City has taken care of all the concerns through the modification and conditions of approval that have been incorporated and therefore the Commission has the ability to certify the Addendum. As a follow up to the condition on Page 127, she would recommend adding to Subpart "B", "subject to City satisfaction". 14. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Ms. Chris Clarke gave a presentation on the project. At the end of her presentation, the applicant requested clarification on the Assessor Parcel Numbers on each of the applications and that the off -site street issue with Highway 1 1 1 in the Tentative Parcel Map be the same as in the Site Development Permit. 15. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Tyler asked how many Walmarts there were in the Valley. Ms. Clarke stated there were some proposed for Palm Desert and Palm Springs. Community Development Director Jerry Herman asked if Ms. Clark agreed with condition #84 as amended by the City Attorney. Ms. Clarke stated she did agree. She further stated she has given a well site to CVWD and it is all she is required to give per her Specific Plan. In regard to the retention basin, she requests the condition be amended to comply with the City's new design guidelines for retention basins. 16. Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment on this item. Mr. Dave Stark, Mazda Kia Superstore, representing the Auto Center on Highway 1 1 1, stated he supported the project as proposed and gave his reasons why. 17. Mr. Scott Gaynor, One Eleven Venture (across the street) 74,333 Highway 1 1 1, Palm Desert, stated his support for the project. 18. Mr. Joe Hammer, owner of the property to the east of the project, stated his support of the project. Commissioner Kirk asked if there was any opportunity for a shared access between the two properties. Mr. Hammer stated they had discussed the issue, but nothing had been agreed upon. 2 1 O G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 6 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 19. Mr. Paul Parrish, architect for the project, gave a presentation on the sign proposal for the building signs. This is a large building, set a long distance from Highway 1 1 1, therefore the amount of signage is reasonable. The signs provide directional assistance to the customers. Most signs are too small to be seen from Highway 1 1 1. Commissioner Kirk asked if the proposed 20 signs were for Phase I and II. Mr. Parrish clarified the request is for both phases. 20. Mr. Stan Rothbart, Rothbar Development, authorized representative for Walmart, thanked the City Attorney for her assistance for drafting Condition #84 and stated it is acceptable to Walmart. 21. Ms. Clarke asked for clarification on Condition #50.b. be amended to state she "....will be reimbursed..."; Condition #83 replace " the Planning Commission" with "Community Development Director". 22. There being no further public participation, the public comment portion of the public hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 23. Commissioner Tyler stated this is a wonderful opportunity for the City. There is a lot of focus on signage and asked if there was any way to continue this portion to a different time. Staff noted the Planning Commission could approve the project and continue the sign program to a future date as a business item. Commissioner Tyler stated his concern about the landscaping and Walmart's ability to maintain it. He would like the final landscaping to come back to the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee (ALRC) and the Planning Commission with some guarantee as to how it will appear. 24. Commissioner Robbins stated he agreed with Commissioner Tyler in that Walmart has not been a good neighbor to the City in regard to the landscaping and the storage containers. He has no problems with the project as proposed, but does have a problem with the performance level of Walmart. He asked how the City could ensure this center does not turn out the same way. He questioned the condition as it is written, as he was not sure that the landscaping as it is currently proposed, is acceptable. There needs to be discussion regarding the 34-foot high light standards, k "t G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 7 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 as he believes this is too high. He is concerned about the side and rear elevations as there is almost zero articulation. He is concerned about any future use of storage containers during Phase I so they are not in public view on the vacant land adjacent to the Building "B". 25. Commissioner Kirk stated that on the whole it is a good project. Much of the staff report was on the economic analysis. Building "B" design is pretty good for that size of a building in regard to articulation. Building "A", however, has very little articulation and interest and there was no comment from the ALRC. He is concerned about the blight that could be caused by Walmart leaving the existing center. He does commend the applicant and City Attorney on their work to resolve this issue. Other challenges are the signs as he does not agree with 20 signs no matter how far the building is from Highway 1 1 1. He also has concerns about lighting and parking. The Highway 111 Center has too much asphalt and poorly managed landscaping. This will be a positive project for the City once the issues are resolved. 26. Commissioner Tyler asked about Condition #38 regarding the telephone system. Staff was unaware of why it was there. Staff would remove it. 27. Chairman Abels commended the applicant on the appearance of the project. 28. Commissioner Tyler stated he believed signs were significant at the beginning, but once the center is built everyone knows where everything is located. 29. Senior Engineer Steve Speer went over some condition changes: Condition #39, if the retention basin goes below 6-feet deep the City will use the same criteria. Staff will delete the last sentence and replace with, "the retention basin depth may be increased in accordance with the provisions of revised Engineering Bulletin 97- 03" . 30. Commissioner Robbins asked who was responsible for maintaining the retention basin and how does the City ensure the retention basin is maintained. Staff noted the City would require the merchant association would maintain it. Commissioner Robbins ..7 noted the problem of having the merchants maintain the G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 8 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 landscaping up to the City's standards and the City has been unable to enforce this, what can be put into the conditions that has teeth to require the developer to maintain it. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated a commercial area should be treated differently than a residential district. A suggestion is that a condition be placed on them to pay the City to maintain it. 31. Commissioner Kirk asked if they could be conditioned that if it was determined the development was not being maintained, can the City condition the project to allow the City to go in and maintain at their expense. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated a condition could be added to that affect. Chairman Abels recessed the meeting at 9:08 and reconvened at 9:26 p.m. 32. Senior Engineer Steve Speer continued with condition changes: Condition #39, the last sentence will be deleted regarding the on - site two foot depth. Condition #50 A.1.b regarding the 28-foot wide landscape median, inside the parentheses staff will replace with "(developer is required to construct 50% of the landscape median for at their expense per the Conditions of Approval for Specific Plan 97-029)". "The remaining 50% of the expense will be reimbursed from the City's Development Impact Fee Fund in accordance with the policies established for that program." Condition #58, Change "30-feet" to "90-feet", in both locations. Condition #55, strike the last sentence. Condition #50.A.1. change to read "widened section" for both the Site Development Permit and Tentative Parcel Map. 33. City Attorney stated that in regard to the landscaping, it has been agreed to by both the City and the applicant, that in regard to Retail Building "B", there would be a posting of a $25,000 letter of credit or bond acceptable to the City Attorney and would remain in effect for five years. The property owner would have a 30-day notice period to correct any problems the City saw in the landscaping maintenance. The property owner would provide the addresses to which any notices would be provided. At the end of the five year period if they performed well, the bond would be released and if not the bond would be renewed for an additional five year period. Language would be added to Condition #69 to add "interior". G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 9 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 34. Commissioner Robbins stated this should apply to more than just Building "B". City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated the bonding requirement is something that was agreed to with Walmart, it is the Commission's prerogative. There is no occupant to consent or object at this time. Commissioner Robbins asked if it was a condition that could be placed on the merchant association for the entire site. Discussion followed as to applying this to the entire site and not just the Walmart site. Ms. Clarke stated there are two sets of CC&R's. A Master Association on the entire 90 acres and the existing Auto Centre has their own association under the Master Association. Additional associations can be created to control each of the tenants. 35. Commissioner Kirk added the condition should be strengthened to allow the City to notify the property owner that it was not be maintained as agreed to and go in and clean up the landscaping at the owners expense and lien the property. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated Retail "B" could be covered by the bond and the remainder of the site would be covered by a condition of approval. 36. Commissioner Kirk asked staff to explain how they came up with the number of signs they were recommending. Staff stated it was a determination based on other sign programs. Staff suggested the sign program be pulled and brought back for approval at a future date, under a business item. 37. Commissioner Kirk suggested Building "A" elevation articulation be brought back for review. Ms. Clarke stated she is willing to bifurcate Building "A", but this is Kohl's standard building. Mr. Gary Shepner, architect for the project, gave a presentation on the elevation design for Building "A". He suggested a popout treatment be applied similar to the Walmart building. Commissioner Kirk suggested the applicant work with staff to add some articulation to the rear elevation of Building "A" and "B" to add some visual interest. 38. Commissioner Robbins stated his concern regarding the height of the 34 foot high light standards. Following discussion it was determined to leave them at 34 feet. 2.13 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 10 010 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 39. Commissioner Robbins asked that a condition be added that while Walmart is being constructed and during Phase I, there will be no storage containers on the vacant eastern pad. They can apply for a permit to have the containers in the rear of the Walmart building. 40. Commissioner Kirk asked what the standard time limit was for a gas station. Staff stated it is not specifically stated in the Ordinance and there has been no standard. Discussion resulted in changing the time limit for the Conditional Use Permit to five years. 41. Commissioner Tyler asked that the street entering off of Highway 1 1 1 with a right -in be designated a one-way street. 42. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-024, recommending Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for an Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (1997) and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (1998), subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 43. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-025, recommending approval of Conditional Use Permit 2002-067 subject to the findings and conditions of approval, subject to the conditions as amended: A. Condition #1: "...shall be used within five years..." B. Correct Condition #4.b: to add, "(i) an option agreement satisfactory to the City..." ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. n ,1 oil. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 11 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 44. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-026 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-728, subject to the findings and conditions as amended: A. Condition #10: eliminate the sentence referring to the meandering wall. B. Condition #50.A.1.b. "(The developer is required to pay 50% of the landscape median improvements at their own expense pursuant to Specific Plan 97-029. The remaining 50% of the landscape median improvements will be reimbursed from the City's Development Impact Fee Fund in accordance with policies established for that program.)" C. Condition #58: Change 30-feet to 90-feet. D. Condition #64: The final landscape plan shall include an enhanced landscape entry statement at the intersection of Auto Centre Drive and La Quinta Drive. The enhancements are for the access lane east of La Quinta Drive only. E. Condition 50.A.1 : "...and widen the north half as required for the widened section." F. Condition #65: The final landscape plans shall be reviewed by the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee and the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any permit for the construction of the parking lot. The review by the Planning Commission will be conducted as a business item. G. Condition #67: The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter and interior landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. 1. For the Retail Building "B" site, a $25,000 bond or letter of credit in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, shall be posted prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Retail Building "B". The bond or letter of credit shall initially remain in effect for a period of five years. During that period, if the City determines that the landscaping is not being properly maintained, it shall provide notice, at the addresses to be provided by the applicant or owner, of the need to correct the specific deficiencies. If the deficiencies in the landscaping are not corrected within 30 days of the mailing of the notice, the City shall have the right to call the bond 012 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 12 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 or letter of credit, and the proceeds shall be utilized to the extent needed to correct the landscaping deficiencies. If, after five years, the landscaping has been properly maintained, the City shall release the bond or letter of credit. If, in the determination of the Community Development Director, the landscaping has not been properly maintained, the bond or letter of credit shall be renewed and maintained for an additional five year period. 2. For the entire Planning Area III, the landscaping and irrigation system shall be well maintained and any dead plant material shall be promptly replaced. If the landscaping is not properly maintained, and if the condition is not cured within 30 days of the notice of the deficiencies, the City shall have the right to cause the correction of the deficiencies in the landscaping, and the applicant/owner agrees that the costs of the correction shall be recorded as a lien against the property. This remedy shall be in addition to any other remedies the City has by law." H. Conditions #82-83: eliminated and replaced with a condition to require all signs to come back to the Planning Commission at a future date as a Business Item. I. Condition #86.A.b: "(i) an option agreement, satisfactory to the City..." J. Add a new Condition #88: "No outdoor storage or outdoor storage containers will be permitted on the vacant area of Phase II for Building "B". However, storage and storage containers can be permitted along the rear of Building "B" provided a Minor Use Permit is granted by the Planning Commission as a business item review process." K. Add a new Condition #89: "The rear elevations of Buildings "A" and "B" shall include visual interest as deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director." L. Add a Condition regarding the right -in off Highway 1 1 1 to be properly signed as a one-way. M. Add all conditions received from the Coachella Valley Water District ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. �:.:. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 13 0 13 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 88. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-027, recommending approval of Tentative Parcel Map 30420, subject to the findings and conditions of approval. A. Condition #38: last paragraph eliminated B. Condition 65.A.1: "...and widen the north half as required for the widened section." C. Condition #76: "The applicant shall submit final landscape plans for approval by the Community Development Department after Planning Commission review and action and...." D. All conditions submitted by the Coachella Valley Water District in their letter dated February 25, 2002. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. E. Environmental Assessment 2001-440 and Capital _Improvement Project 2001-14 for the La Quinta Northeast Fire Station; a request of the City for Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for an Environmental Assessment and approval of a Capital Improvement Project for the construction of a fire station. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Consultant Nicole Crist presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Robbins asked why the Environmental Assessment was not included in the Planning Commission packet for their review. Chairman Abels recessed the hearing to allow the Commission time to review the Environmental Assessment and reconvened the meeting. 3. Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment on this item. There being no further public participation, the public comment portion of the public hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. u14 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 14 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 4. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-028, recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-440. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 5. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-029, recommending approval of Capital Improvement Project 2001-14, subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. C. Village Use Permit 2000-040, Amendment #1; a request of Chapman Golf Development to allow development plans for a 7,500 square foot restaurant at the northeast corner of Avenue 52 and Desert Club Drive. 1 . Commissioner Kirk withdrew due to a possible conflict of interest and left the dias. 2. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Robbins asked if the landscaping would conform to the City's Landscaping Ordinance. Staff noted it complies with the Ordinance. 4. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Ralph Raya, MRC Associates, the lighting consultant, gave a presentation on the project's exterior lighting. �. X vl� G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 15 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 5. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of the lighting consultant. Commissioner Tyler asked the color of the high pressure sodium lights. Mr. Raya stated it was the amber color and explained the appearance. 6. Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment. Mr. Skip Lench, 78-215 Calle Cadiz, stated his concern that either this item be continued or set aside approving the landscaping and lighting. When this project was before the City Council, the applicant was requested to work with the neighbors in regard to the trees and lighting. They called the applicant and they agreed to get together, but never did. Now this is a different lighting engineer. The Planning staff was also directed to meet with the neighbors and also did not meet with the neighbors. The lights were at 18 feet and now tonight they have a new lighting study and the lights are at 16 feet. This project backs up to residential properties. The new restaurant on La Fonda has lights at 12 feet. The La Quinta Hotel has 16 foot high lights. All they are asking is to meet with the applicant to resolve the issues. The applicant is planting African Sumacs along the wall and back of their property that will grow 16-18 feet high. 7. Commissioner Tyler asked the location of his house. Mr. Lench indicated the location of his house on the plans. 8. Mr. Michael Brauchman, 78-175 Calle Cadiz, stated he attended a City Council meeting where the applicant was required to lower the lights to six feet or less and to work with the neighbors. His concern is that the lighting schedule and landscaping are not consistent with the City's Ordinance. He assumes there will still be valet parking and the trash enclosure would be move further away from the residences. 9. There being no further public comment, the public participation portion of the hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 10. Commissioner Tyler stated this project was required to lower the lights along the perimeter and he is confused as to why they are not lowered. Staff noted that the Planning Commission recommendation was sent to the Council and the Council �? requested the applicant work with the neighbors. Subsequently, uld G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 16 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 the project was redesigned and a new lighting plan was required. That is why the neighbors were not contacted as it had to come back to the Commission for review and approval. 11. Commissioner Butler asked if the neighbors were given an opportunity to review the lighting and landscaping plans. Staff noted some had been into City Hall to review the plans. Commissioner Butler asked if any of the view corridors could be maintained. Staff noted the landscape architect could address this. Mr. Rob Parker, RGA Landscape Architects, landscape architect for the project, stated he was not aware of any issue with regard to the height of the trees. The trees are there as required by the City. The height was to shield the lighting in the parking lot and shade the parking lot. The number of trees could be reduced along the neighbors property line to maintain any view. They would be more than happy to meet with the neighbors to increase their view corridor. Commissioner Butler asked when the height of the light standards changed. Mr. Raya stated the original lighting plan did have taller light fixtures along the property line. When reviewed by the City Council they were required to be lowered to six feet or lower. The lighting engineer at that time is no longer with the project and they moved the lights further into the interior of the project and lowered the foot candles. They are more than happy to meet with the property owners. Discussion followed regarding the light fixtures. 12. Commissioner Robbins stated this is a good project, but there seems to be a lack of coordination with the neighbors. 13. Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment. There being no further public comment, the public participation portion of the public hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 14. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-030, approving Village Use Permit 2000-004, Amendment #1, subject to the findings and conditions with the lighting and landscaping plans returning to the Planning Commission on March 26, 2002. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Kirk. ABSTAIN: None. 017 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 17 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 Commissioner Kirk rejoined the Commission. Chairman Abels recessed the meeting at 9:46 p.m. and reconvened at 9:49 p.m. VII. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. General Plan Consistency Finding; a request of Desert Sands Unified School District for a finding of General Plan conformity for Desert Sands Unified School District Elementary School Project, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65401 for the property located at the northeast corner of Calle Tampico and Eisenhower Drive. 1. Chairman Abels asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if KSL was on hold for their project on this site. Staff stated if this project is constructed, KSL's project would go away. 3. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. The applicant was not present. 4. Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment. There being no further public comment, the public participation portion was closed and open for Commission discussion. 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-031 finding General Plan Conformity for Desert Sands Unified School District Elementary School Project pursuant to California Government Code Section 65401. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 018 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 18 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 B. Capital Improvement Project 2000-10, a request of the City of La Quinta for review of development plans for a two story detached addition and rehabilitation of the historic City of La Quinta Historic Society Museum located at the southeast corner of Avenida Montezuma and Calle Mendoza (77-885 Avenida Montezuma). 1. Chairman Abels asked for the staff report. Community Services Director Dodie Horvitz presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. There being no questions of staff, or the applicant, Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment. There being no public comment, the public participation portion was closed and open for Commission discussion 3. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Minute Motion 2002-003 approving Capital Improvement Project 2002-003, as recommended. Unanimously approved. C. Plaza Tampico Sign Program, Amendment #3; a request of Plaza Tampico to amend the Plaza Tampico Sign Program to allow first floor business tenants facing Calle Tampico to use Gatorform for building signs for the property located at 78-150 Calle Tampico . 1. Chairman Abels asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Robbins asked if this was a new material. Staff stated yes. 3. Commissioner Tyler asked if this is restricted to only the buildings that face Calle Tampico or if the other tenants can use this. Staff stated it was an option for first floor tenants. 4. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Matt Johnson, 73-134 Bel Air, the applicant, gave a presentation on his project. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 19 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 5. There being no public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the meeting and opened for Commission discussion. 6. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to adopt Minute Motion 2002-004 approving Plaza Tampico Sign Program Amendment #3, as requested. Unanimously approved. D. Sign Application 2002-597 (an Amendment to Sign Application 2000- 502); a request of Chevron Oil (Greg Hohn) to amend the sign program for Dune Palms Center to allow canopy signing for the property located at the southeast corner of Dune Palms Road and Highway 1 1 1 1. Chairman Abels asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Kirk asked what signage is generally allowed for a service station. Staff stated they have allowed spanner signs as long as they are not illuminated. 3. Commissioner Robbins asked staff to define a spanner. Staff stated the applicant could do this. 4. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Commissioner Robbins asked staff to define a spanner. Mr. Greg Hogue, representing Chevron, gave an illustration of the spanner sign above the gas pump. 5. Commissioner Tyler asked the intended purpose of the sale signs. Mr. Hogue stated it is for advertisement of the food mart. Commissioner Tyler asked why there was no signage for the convenience store. Mr. Hogue stated it is not owned by Chevron but is an independent owner. Commissioner Tyler asked how this request compares with the USA gas station approval across the street. Staff stated they did not know at this time. Discussion followed regarding the spanners. 6. Mr. Tim Fetterly, principal of the project, stated his reasons for the signage. The convenience store will come back at a later dater , G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 20 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 7. Mr. Mark Rodriguez, Chevron Project Manager, stated the image is their issue. The site is lower than the street with the landscaping. The added illumination will help to identify the site. 8. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the meeting and opened for Commission discussion. 9. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Butler to adopt Minute Motion 2002-005 approving Sign Application 2002- 597, as amended with the lighted spanners. Unanimously approved. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. IX. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. Commissioner Tyler gave a report on the City Council meeting of February 19, 2002. X. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Robbins to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a special meeting of the Planning Commission to be held February 27, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 1 1:14 p.m. on February 26, 2002. Respectfully submitted, /7 B y . awyer, Executive Secretary City o La Quinta, California u21. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 21 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A Special meeting of the Planning Commission held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California February 27, 2002 I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:04 p.m. by Chairman Abels who asked Commissioner Tyler to lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Richard Butler, Steve Robbins, Robert Tyler, and Chairman Jacques Abels. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Robbins to excuse Commissioner Kirk. Unanimously approved. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, City Attorney Kathy Jenson, Senior Engineer Steve Speer, Planning Consultant Nicole Criste, Principal Planner Fred Baker, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: None V. PUBLIC HEARING A. Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan Update, Annexation No. 12 and Sphere of Influence Amendment (Sch#2000091023), and General Plan Update and Master Environmental Assessment; a request of the City for Certification of an Environmental Impact Report for the Comprehensive General Plan, Annexation No. 12 and Sphere of Influence Amendment, and for adoption of the General Plan Update and Master Environmental Assessment. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and requested the staff report. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file 23 1 in the Community Development Department. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-27-09 GenPI.WPD 1 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked the location of the property referred to by A&M in their letter of request. Community Development Director Jerry Herman noted the area on the map. 3. Commissioner Butler asked if any of the property owners wanted to come back at a later date to request a Zone Change would they be able to do so? Staff stated yes. 4. Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment. Pomelos Ranch, LLC, 201 Ocean Avenue, Apartment #1009B, Santa Monica, stated he supported the annexation. 5. Mrs. Gayle Cady, 82-831 Avenue 54, Vista Santa Rosa, stated she would like the Vision Statement of the Annexation Plan regarding the current Land Use Map to keep the continuity of their rural agricultural life style. On Page 17, the buildout dwelling units and population totals, for Planning Areas No. 1 and 2 are dramatically out of context for what the residents of their community would like to see. She requested this be reduced. On Map 3.6 referring to the Agrarian Corridor, there is no Agrarian Corridor provision for Madison Street or Avenue 58 to Lake Cahuilla. She requested this be added. Additionally, she requested a provision be added for the connection of trails to include Avenue 52. Also on Map 3.10 Multi -purpose trails are not included on Avenue 52, Avenue 54 east and west, or on Madison Street to Avenue 64. These need to be added before any decision is made. Program 12.3 indicates the Agrarian Image Corridor shall include Madison Street, Jackson Street, Harrison Avenue, Avenue 54, Avenue 58, Avenue 62 and Avenue 66. She would like this to also include Avenue 52, which is the heart and center of the equestrian living and activity. 6. Mr. Jesse McKeever, 82-550 Avenue 60, stated he does not support annexation. His concern is the amount of water that is being wasted and the drop in the water table. 7. Mr. Jeff Harrison, 54-102 Avenida Bermudas, representing the La Quinta Cove Neighborhood Organization, gave a presentation on their desire to preserve the quality of life in the Cove and throughout the City of La Quinta. 8. Mr. Joe Hammer, 74-757 North Cove Area, Indian Wells, stated he and/or his family own three parcels of property. On the 40 acre parcel at Avenue 65 and Tyler, in Planning Area No. 2, his concern 2 3 .-) U G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-27-09 GenPI.WPD 2 is that the Coachella Valley Unified School District will be building a new school facility consisting of 80 acres at Avenue 66 and Tyler which has generated a lot of interest in their property. He noted that all the land to the south of Avenue 65 is within the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation. At a public meeting, one of the Tribal members included his 40 acre parcel on Avenue 65 as part of their land and it is not. He requested the Commission consider annexing the non -Reservation lands. The second parcel is between Avenue 62 and Avenue 63 on Jackson Street. This parcel is also surrounded by Tribal Land. Their request is to ask that this parcel be included in the Annexation. The third parcel is 40 acres located at Avenue 59 and Monroe Street. This parcel they would like to develop as Neighborhood Commercial and/or High Density Residential to develop apartments. 9. Mr. Don Recktor, 46-450 Cameo Palms, requested the Dark Sky Ordinance be included as part of the General Plan Policy. His concern is to retain the open space and preserving Point Happy Ranch as a wildlife preserve or open space. 10. Ms. Judy Schenkman, 53-540 Avenida Villa, stated she was interested seeing that a Golf Cart Transportation Plan was implemented for the residents in the Cove. 11. Mr. Brent Lance, Diamantina LLC, 84-401 Avenue 61, stated he owns 40 acres at 84-041 Avenue 61, stated he would like to request a change to the Agricultural/Equestrian Overlay to be more meaningful. He would like a change to Exhibit 2.1, the Legend which still only refers to a Agricultural Overlay, to refer also to Equestrian and Agricultural. This would clarify that the changes made on Page 11 to incorporate reference to equestrian uses were intended to apply to the entire area in Planning area 1 and 2. 12. Mr. Robert Kull, 54-721 Monroe Street, stated he owns 40 acres east of Monroe Street and supports the annexation and asks they maintain the ranch style. 13. Mrs. Kay Wolff, 77-227 Calle Ensenada, member of Cove Neighborhood Group, stated she agrees with Mr. McKeevor and Mr. Harrison. One of their issues was to allow golf course privileges for all residents to the existing golf courses. The residents do not want another golf course, they would either like privileges to the existing golf courses or have the City assume one after it is no longer viable. Her own concerns are that the G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-27-09 GenPI.WPD 3 anticipated population growth for the Planning Areas is too large. The EIR makes no reference to the total cost of services to maintain Planning Areas 1 or 2. The Draft EIR gave these figures and stated the deficient was to be balanced out by the businesses, assessments and taxes of the residents of the current City boundaries. This is unacceptable. She would also request that the request of A & M Construction to rezone the park area along the Bear Creek Storm Channel be denied. She would like to request a philosophy of slow growth, very very low density, and high quality commercial development be adopted. The City needs to be "picky", charming and small. Mitigate the negative effects of water, noise, and traffic and keep La Quinta small and charming. 14. There being no further public comment, the public participation portion of the public hearing is closed and open for Commission discussion. 15. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste reviewed the comments that were made. Regarding Ms. Cady's request for Agrarian Image Corridors and Trails to General Plan maps and on Page 16 of staff report, it is suggested that multi -use trails be designated on Avenue 62, Avenue 54 and Van Buren Street in addition to those already designated. On Page 19 of the staff report, it is suggested Agrarian Image Corridors be placed on Airport Boulevard, Avenue 60, Monroe Street, and Van Buren Street and that the program be amended. Mr. Hammer's first two properties were included in the Planning Areas; now they are both out of the area. The third property is Item A.3 of the staff report along with the analysis. Mr. Rector referred to the Dark Sky principals. There were discussions between the Commission and Council recommending that it not be added. However, Policy #10 of the General Plan states the City will maintain the Dark Sky Ordinance. Mr. Lance's suggestion regarding the Agricultural Overlay being changed to Agricultural/Equestrian and on Page 18 of staff report it is recommended the term Agricultural Overlay be changed to Agricultural/Equestrian Overlay. Ms. Wolff's question regarding the cost revenue analysis for Planning Area No. 1 and No. 2, Planning Area No. 1 was analyzed in the EIR under the heading of Annex No. 12 and Planning Area No. 2 under the Sphere of Influence. The Tables regarding cost revenue analysis are located on Page 3-206 of Draft EIR Table 47 and Table 48 on Page 3-207. Ms. Criste went over the revisions that had been made. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-27-09 GenPI.WPD 4 Chairman Abels recessed the meeting at 8:16 p.m. and reconvened at 8:25 16. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste stated there were two approvals that needed to be made. Attachment "A" which dealt with Land Use changes and Attachment "B" which dealt with the other Text Changes that had been requested. In addition, staff is recommending a designation of Multi -purpose Trails on the even numbered streets on Avenues 50 through 60 in addition to the trails recommended in the staff report. 17. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Robbins to accept Attachment "A" as recommended by staff. Unanimously approved. 18. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Tyler to accept Attachment "B" as recommended by staff including the Multi -purpose Trails on the even numbered streets on Avenues 50 through 60. Unanimously approved. 19. It was moved and seconded by Commissioner Butler/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-032 recommending to the City Council certification of the Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan Update, Annexation No. 12, and Sphere of Influence Amendment and amend the General Plan by adopting an Updated General Plan and Master Environmental Assessment, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. VI. ADJOURNMENT: It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adjourn this special meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting of the Planing Commission on March 12, 2002. This special meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 8 : 30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, B y J awyer, Executive Secretary 231 0r!"' G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-27-09 GenPI.WPD 5 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: A/P l MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA February 13, 2002 I. CALL TO ORDER 10:00 a.m. A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Committee was called to order at 10:06 a.m. by Principal Planner Stan Sawa who led the flag salute. B. Committee Members present: Dennis Cunningham and David Thoms. It was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Thoms to excuse Committee Member Bobbitt. Unanimously approved. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Planning Consultant Nicole Criste, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Principal Planner Stan Sawa asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of January 16, 2002. Commissioner Thoms requested that his name be spelled correctly on Page 2, Item #2. There being no further corrections, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Thoms to approve the Minutes as submitted. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Capital Improvement Project 2001-14; a request of the City for review of architectural and landscaping plans for a new fire station to be located on the west side of Adams Street, north of Miles Avenue. 1. Consultant Planner Nicole Criste presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. G:\W1PD0CS\ARLC\2-13-02.wpd 1 �� 3 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes February 13, 2002 2. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the roof proposed was standing seam metal roof. Mr. Jerrin Chu, WLC Architects, architects the project, stated originally there were two options; one with the concrete the and one standing seam roof. Committee Member Cunningham stated his concern was that there is a lot of roof and with the standing seam metal roof there is a lot more shadow line with rifts. There should be a color chosen that would create a little excitement to the building. This area of the City has a lot of housing developments with a few non-residential buildings, such as the school with a contemporary building that takes away the constant red the roof look. This is an opportunity to create a little lightness to tie in with the school and the other buildings to bring color to the area. The concrete tile would be dull. If the standing seam is used, it should not be gray in color either, but maybe something in the oxide reds, or maybe green to bring color. The landscaping lends to the area. Mr. Chu stated originally they had two options presented to the Council; standing seam and concrete tile. The Council chose the gray cement tile to be compatible in the area. At the same time they wanted to match the local community and the church and therefore, they went with the concrete tiles. Committee Member Cunningham stated he did not know if it was within the Committee's prevue to ask Council to revisit the subject with the ALRC input. It is a strong structure and the idea of compatibility does not necessarily mean it needs to be the same to be compatible. To have it blend in is a mistake. It needs its own identity. He would ask that the City Council reconsider their suggestion. 3. Committee Member Thorns sated he did not know if he could support that comment. This project is adjacent to a church parking lot, then the church further to the south and to the north is an open park. On the east side is residential, so this would stand out in the streetscape and the City would be criticized if we took a City project and allowed a metal roof where there is no justification other than some shadow lines. 4. Committee Member Cunningham asked Committee Member Thoms if he thought the tile proposed was the right kind and color. With each member making opposite comments, there needs to be some direction to the architect and Council. 23 G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\2-13-02.wpd 2 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes February 13, 2002 5. Committee Member Thoms stated he did not think a public building should not necessarily try to be in contrast to what the neighborhood is. It does not need to stand out as a prominent item. He has no issue with the red tile. 6. Committee Member Thoms asked if the street would be improved from the park to the church; what ill happen to that section in front of the pumping station. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste stated the City is responsible for the improving the length including the pump station. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste stated there would be wrought iron fencing on the north side to give views into the park and the other two sides would have a block wall. He then asked about the gate into the pump station. Staff stated it is unknown other than a block wall. Committee Member Thoms asked if the landscape plan calls for three palm trees and one appears to be on top of the flag pole. Staff would note the change. Committee Member Thoms asked what the standard size was for a palm tree. Staff stated it is based on the height of the palm. Committee Member Thoms stated the palms need some height such as the California palm. He further stated he was not comfortable with the entrance landscaping. He would like to see the landscaping over a grading plan. This site will be at the same elevation as the pump station. As the pump station is higher than the park and street, so the entrance will have a gradient. The landscape design does not seem to recognizes the height differential. The mounding at the pump station and south of the driveway could not occur. The entrance does not reflect the gradient that it will probably turn out to be. The landscape plan needs to be done over a grading plan. DG is proposed for a slope and it does not stay on a slope very well. He has no problem with the palette itself or the lawn versus the decomposed granite, his concern is the design of the entrance and the design of the use of the materials in relationship to the ground plate itself. When staff reviews a more precise plan they should consider the grading plan at the same time they look at the landscape plan. Also, some vine material fixed to the concrete wall on the street side and on the south and west side. On the streetscape between the property line and curb, there is a meandering sidewalk that is not reflected on the plan. The plan also calls for a pine tree and within view of this project there are no pine trees. There is a mixture of pepper and jacaranda and mesquite, but we do not need to introduce a pine on this street. Find something that is already existing from across the street. 23 7. Committee Member Cunningham stated he would like the block 0 f3 3 G:\WPDOCS\AR C\2-13-02.wpd 3 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes February 13, 2002 wall to be a split face block. It also calls for stone wainscot on the lower portion of the building. He would suggest taking the split face and using it in this area to soften the building. Planning Consultant Nicole Crist stated staff could add a condition that wainscoting be the split face block as well and have split face on the pump station wall on all sides. 8. Committee Member Cunningham suggested a flat tile roof that blends with the split face. If you are going to veneer the building with the brown split face, blend the roof color to the split face, then you have the brown with the pump station that will tie it all together with the split face perimeter wall. 9. There being no discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Thoms to adopt Minute Motion 2002-005 recommending approval of Capital Improvement Project 2001-14, subject to the conditions as amended: 1. The height of the palm trees is to be substantial. 2. The design of the landscaping along the driveway and over the entire site shall take into consideration the grade. 3. Vine material shall be added to the wall on the street side, west side and south side. 4. The pine trees in the streetscape shall be replaced with something consistent with what is across Adams Street. 5. The perimeter wall shall be split face and a split face veneer used instead of the wainscoting. 6. The roof color shall be compatible with the split face color. Unanimously approved. B. Site Development Permit 2001-729; a request of Michael Shovlin for Ross Dress for Less) for review of architectural plans for a 30,187 square foot commercial building to be located on the orth side of Highway 1 1 1 1, east of Washington Street within the One Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Thoms asked about the roof color. Staff stated it would match what is existing in the Center. 3. Committee Member Cunningham stated it is keeping with the 0 (_ GAWPD0CS\ARLC\2-13-02.wpd 4 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes February 13, 2002 Center. With regard to the color, color is getting to be the trend and there is a lot of responsibility with color. Staff needs to ask for the actual color chips and where the color lines break. He has no objections to this project. 4. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Cunningham/Thorns to adopt Minute Motion 2002-006 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-729, subject to the conditions as recommended. Unanimously approved. C. Capital Improvement 2001-10; a request of the City for review of architectural plans for a two story detached addition and rehabilitation of the Historic City of La Quinta Historic Society Museum located at the southeast corner of Avenida Montezuma and Calle Mendoza (77-885 Avenida Montezuma). 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Cunningham stated he had no objection. He asked if they would be using random mudded and . Mr. Paul Johnson, architect for the project, stated he proposing to use red boosting throughout the roof. They do not want the roof to be too rough but do want texture and character. The stucco color will be similar to what is existing. 3. Committee Member Thorns asked about the existing door and if there was any connection to the paved area. Staff stated it would stay as it is historical. 4. Committee Member Thorns asked about the planters. Mr. Johnson stated the planters would be added to the top of the pavement. They would be detached and protected to retain it for historical purposes. Additional planters would be added as well. All existing trees will be retained as much as possible. Committee Member Thoms asked about the four palms and stated they should be used as an accept; four are too much and they should be replaced and a desert scheme used. If shade is wanted use the Palo Verde. 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Thorns to adopt Minute Motion - G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\2-13-02.wpd 5 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes February 13, 2002 2002-007 recommending approval of Capital Improvement Project 2001-10, as recommended. Unanimously approved. D. Site Development Permit 2001-728; a request of Stamko Development Company for review of architectural and landscaping plans for a retail shopping center, plant nursery, garden center, auto repair, specialty shop, nd an auto service station, in conjunction with Retail Building "B". 1. Community Development Director Jerry Herman presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff asked the material and color of the canopy for the proposed gas station. Mr. Bill Parrish, architect for the project, stated it would be made out of metal and would be blue and painted to match. 2. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the applicant wanted to give a presentation. Mr. Gary Shepner, Perkowit, gave a presentation on the project. 3. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the fonts shown on the elevations would be used for the signage. Mr. Shepner stated it was their hope. Committee Member Cunningham stated it bring an identify to each of the retail centers. The design is modern and contemporary and not over the top which is good. This will work with the other new buildings in the area. He likes the metal work in the front as it is proportionate. 4. Committee Member Thoms asked where the accent red color would be used. Mr. Shepner stated it would be used where the blue is shown on the elevation. Committee Member Thoms asked if each building has its own accent color. Mr. Shepner stated yes. Committee Member Thoms asked if the landscape plans would come later. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated yes, after the approval process. Committee Member Thoms stated he would like to see that there is some kind of landscape statement made, other than a sea of trees, at the entrance to tie it together. Ms. Chris Clarke, the applicant, stated this is an addition to the auto center and the same theme will flow over to this project for the entire 90 acres. Statements have been made and awards won for the Highway 11 landscape theme. 5. Committee Member Cunningham stated the auto center was done in conjunction with the City's landscaping plans. 2 4A. ()f16 G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\2-13-02.wpd 6 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes February 13, 2002 6. Committee Member Thorns stated he concurs with the landscape statement, but does not see it in the plans. There is no statement being made here. Ms. Clarke stated the monument signs and landscaping will be carried over to this project. She went on to explain the design. Discussion followed regarding the landscaping. Mr. Chuck Sicre, landscape architect gave a presentation on the materials to be used. He explained that when the detailed drawings are made it will allow for a better concept. 7. Committee Member Cunningham stated that if the architectural elements on the front of the buildings were carried over to the gas station it would soften up the look of roof structure, it would add to the statement of the project. 8. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Cunningham/Thoms to adopt Minute Motion 2002-008 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-725, subject to the conditions. Enhance the landscape entry statement. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None Vill. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Thoms to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on March 6, 2002. This meeting was adjourned at 1 1:20 a.m. on February 13, 2002. Respe tfully submitted, TY AWYER, xecutive Secretary City a Quinta, California 24" I107 G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\2-13-02.wpd 7 DEPARTMENT REPORT: Tait 04 6&oubdo U = INCORPORATED ti of 9 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager DATE: March 19, 2002 RE: Department Report — Response(s) to Public Comments The following is the response to public comments made at the March 5, 2002 City Council meeting: 1. Ms. Betty Cheney, 54-225 Avenida Carranza, presented the City Council with a copy of a musical that she wrote. • No additional response is necessary. 243 DEPARTMENT REPORT: MARCH 20 APRIL 2 APRIL 5 APRIL 16 APRIL 25-27 MAY 7 JUNE 4 CITY COUNCIL'S UPCOMING EVENTS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING (General Plan Hearing) CITY COUNCIL MEETING VILLAGE FAIRE EVENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING 20TH ANNIVERSARY EVENTS (see attached) CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 18 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 24 71hn 20"HANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION 1, 4 sue..... ..... Hu. UPCOMING a m APRIL 25 APRIL 26 APRIL 27 APRIL 28 CHAMBER MIXER - CITY HALL (5:30 - 7:30 P.M.) MULTI -GENERATIONAL TALENT SHOW - LA QUINTA SENIOR CENTER (7:00 P.M.) COMMUNITY PARADE - FRITZ BURNS COMMUNITY PARK 00:00 A.M.) COMMUNITY PICNIC - FRITZ BURNS COMMUNITY PARK 01:00 A.M.) ARTS & CRAFTS SHOW - LA QUINTA SENIOR CENTER 0:00 - 4:00 P.M.) COVE OASIS TRAIL HIKE - COVE OASIS (5:30 P.M.) STAR -GAZING - COVE OASIS (7:30 P.M.) FISHING DERBY - LAKE CAHUILLA 00:00 P.M. - 10:00 A.M.) GEM OF THE DESERT RUN - FRITZ BURNS COMMUNITY PARK (7:00 A.M.) ART UNDER THE UMBRELLAS - LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION 00:00 A.M. - 4:00 P.M.) ENTERTAINMENT WITH FIREWORKS - LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL (5:30 P.M.) 24; 17 St. Patrick's Day 124 March 2002 Monthly Planner 11 12 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V. Safety -Perkins Mosquito Abate. 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins -Perkins 7:00 PM Planning 6:00 PM League Commission of Cities-Riv.Div. Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission 19 9:00 AM CVB- Henderson 2:00 PM City Council Meeting 13 9:00 AM RCTC- Pena 5:30 PM Invest- ment Advisory Board 20 7:00 PM Special City Council Meeting (General Plan) Aw 1 st Day of Spring 25 26 27 6:00 PM CVAG- 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM CVAG Exec Com-Pena Commission Human/Comm- Meeting Adolph 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson 14 12:00 PM Energy/ Envi-Sniff 7:00 PM Cultural Arts Commission 21 3:30 PM Historic Preservation Commission 28 9:00 AM LAFCO- Henderson 1 15 22 29 P, 16 RMA 30 4 �" April 2002 Monthly Planner Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 2 3 4 5 6 2:00 PM City 10:00 AM ALRC Council Meeting 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V. 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM Energy/ lSafety -Perkins Mosquito Abate. Pena Envi-Sniff 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins 5.30 PM Invest 7:00 PM Cultural Daylight Savings -Perkins 7:00 PM Planning ment Advisory Arts Commission Time 6:00 PM League Commission Board of Cities-Riv.Div. Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 9:00 AM CVB- 3:30 PM Historic Henderson Preservation 2:00 PM City Commission Council Meeting 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM LAFCO- Commission Human/Comm- Henderson Meeting Adolph 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson 20th Anniversary Events 28 29 30 6:00 PM CVAG- Exec Com-Pena March �May S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 31 Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 3/14/2002 May 2002 Monthly Planner Sunday...y Tuesday Wednesday.. ..Saturday r 10:00 AM ALRC 12:00 PM Mayors April June S M T W T F S S MT W T F S Lunch 1 2 3 4 _5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Happy Birthday 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 La Quinta 28 29 30 30 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2:00 PM City 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM Energy/ Council Meeting Pena Envi-Sniff 5:30 PM Invest- 7:00 PM Cultural ment Advisory Arts Commission Board 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V. 3:30 PM Historic 4w Safety -Perkins Mosquito Abate. Preservation Mother's Day 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins -Perkins 7:00 PM Planning Commission 6:00 PM League Commission of Cities-Riv.Div. Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9:00 AM CVB- 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM LAFCO- Henderson Human/Comm- Henderson 2:00 PM City Adolph Council Meeting 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson 26 27 28 29 30 31 7:00 PM Planning Commission Meeting Memorial Day (City Hall Closed) Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 3/14/2002 J DEPARTMENT REPORT: '1f' �aJI c IvcoMRAM) ti OF T TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tom Hartung, Director of Building & Safety ?E-,/-. DATE: March 19, 2002 RE: Monthly Department Report - February 2002 Attached please find the statistical summaries for building permits, Animal Control, Code Compliance, and business licenses for the month of February. The reports depict the following highlights: • Year to date building permit valuation is $33,072,645.65 which represents an issuance of 512 building permits through February; • 314 animal control cases have been handled through February; • 377 code compliance cases have been initiated through February; • 13 new licenses were issued to La Quinta based businesses in February; • $1,080.00 - garage sale permit income in February; • $3,790.00 - Senior Center income in February: New Life Community Church $ 495.00 Sunrise Collections Estate Auction 1,480.00 La Quinta Golf Estates HOA 357.50 La Quinta Arts Assoc. Show & Sale 865.00 Painted Cove HOA 180.00 Lago La Quinta HOA 412.50 $3,790.00 Cs) o p LO U� O O o O C) O C) O C) O 0 O o O C) C) C) C) C) C) C)O C) C) C) C) CD C) a W N rn O e9? r EiJ O E!? O 691 O 6R O Ffi O O O E9 O O (�? O O i E9 O 69 O E9 O d U O UO 00 cq a U J m p p p O N O O O O O O O O C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C)O C) C) O C) O C) O C) C) C) C) M cm a= co C)r y� C) 0 Ei3 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) ad z � 1 � 0069 0o N O O (C) r 0D r- 00 (O O (O O � O U) O O O lf) O N O r O O O O (O O 0 (M r V coo � ti N CA 00U) CY) r--'� CD N U7 r-rl- N (O O 69 O M (O U7 C) U') U7 U7 Col) O 1� p (M (O N (O 6R In 69 r p Ef} 0 00 r N � � � �} 6R °i � � W W W (•') O C) O r 00 00 � U7 N C) (C) C) 'ZT C:)r O f7 O O O IIT 00 ti r O O O (� 00 00 � M W= (LO � O O (n M �' It r- O C) N � N � U7 Ef3 00 U') Nr- N C)C7 bct O � 00 N 00 a r N M lf) (O CO 6F3 C)Efl r r � C" O O (M LO O V- o O O r O C) O C) O C) 00 C) O C) O C) C)(O C) C)qe U ~ C) O In O r M C) C=i C) N O O 00 N O O 00 00 C) (D � C) N O r U) O r ~ CMti N M In (7 ti C)N r (D O 00 (O 00 � 000 Q) (O O O r- (4 69 ER (!i r Efi 6ci CIOff? 69 r � CV) U) N } Z O J O N 60 .A J Q Q i- W J C) O o O (o (n v O (h C)0 C) v 0 O 0 IT 0 0 o 0 O 0 (o 0 O 0 o C) v C) C) CD co a (� m L J Q � � •- o C� r o r- 00 ti o v (o o U7 ai (� o o (C'j0 (� O LO � o O � Nt a~o r Iq (o ~ Z_ V W Z M O N M r- O Cl r N 0 d1 O 0 N _ r oo rn M N M O t� J O H 04 N � M 'T r 'T N E9 ~ (D C E!3 N O U M r 6R r 6fi Ef? r ('M M m m N 69 iA H Z C) � C)O C) C) C) co C)O O O O C)U7 C)rl- O C) C) C)CY) C) C)O (O O O O O O O N O r O U _ dj (•) O ER r lf) (O O O O O O V (O O O N (f) O O O (*') (fl O N (O O U7 U7 O O E!> O O O O M N � Z O O CM 00 � O O I,- (f) 00 tf) N ti '7 04 tf) � M O r 00 64 O ti 6R E9 � � (M 69 69 N 0 N r 40 69 O O 'ci I1 (7 O U) O N N N 00 C) C) N r- 00CM G N M r r (D r r 0 J W C) (O 04 CO M r O r O O r M lf) O r N C)(h a0 W) CM(O _ r r W) U)J Z Q J z0 J � 0N U <HJ O0NO Q rQ 0 coW O r N r r ch r r W = > N W co a rJ rz (n w W 2 0 O � z O w U Q Q w Q Q Q O ZLL Q L Q W Z Z Tf Q (n J JLLI (U w �_ �_ J w �_ U m U W J O U) U) F- ww w C� z � O � O U w J O O 2 w Q Q z O w w O U) U m U w a. a o a U ANIMAL CONTROL REPORT FOR: February, 2002 Steve Alexander, Moises Rodarte, and Jackie Misuraca ANIMAL PICKUPS YEAR TO YEAR TO INCIDENTS FEB DATE 02 DATE 01 HANDLED FEB Dogs Alive 30 65 99 Bite Reports 6 Dead 6 8 5 Animal Trap OTI 1 4 8 Set Ups 4 Cats Alive 5 Dead 3 OTI 0 Other Animals Alive 1 Dead 9 TOTAL ANIMALS 8 10 0 33 10 0 1 1 14 8 Alive 36 74 133 Dead 18 32 23 OTI 1 4 8 TOTAL ANIMALS REMOVED 55 110 164 VIOLATIONS- No Owner Warnings Dogs at Large 12 3 Noise Disturbance 0 0 Defecation removal 0 0 License Violation 0 0 Other 0 Monthly Total 12 3 YEAR TO YEAR TO DATE 02 DATE 01 7 4 5 19 Cruelty to Animals 0 1 1 Vicious Animal Restraining 0 1 0 Special Hour Patrols 0 2 19 Zoning Violations 0 0 5 Lost & Found 22 50 67 Animal Rescue 2 4 2 Outside Agency 0 0 0 City Reclaims 5 16 31 Other 15 23 32 TOTALS 54 109 180 Citations 16 0 2 19 0 35 YEAR TO DATE 29 3 63 TOTAL MONTHLY INCIDENTS HANDLED: FEB. 02- 159 / FEB. 01 - 293 YEAR TO DATE INCIDENTS HANDLED : FEB. 02 - 314 / FEB. 01 - 623 25, 0v3 CODE COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR: February. 2002 Feb. 02 YEAR TO DATE 02 YEAR TO DATE 01 ABATEMENTS: Nuisance Abatement Started 156 225 321 Weed Abatements Started 3 7 21 Vehicle Abatements Started 81 144 268 Dwelling Abatements Started 0 1 1 TOTAL STARTED 240 377 611 TOTAL COMPLETED 139 261 435 Home Occupation Inspections 9 18 22 Business License Inspections 0 0 13 Garage sale permits Issued 108 196 214 25 004 N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O G1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N 'ptiaor—cD�O y 0 0 0 N 0 0 O N O O O O IN N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F- Z W w 2 > W Un 0 Z Q U � O ~ F= z Z z w 0 W Z a U O �JF-aF- Zz ftw 9-j0 JCWnOF- w (DW °F-°p zz °w O-aJ cQn 9('J W�-i —zJQ0 N�Q9wV(Qcn ja00�W1Uiow VzCf)z MF-0mzJQ Iw Q W z)::) w J=) O W O W z0m0QaOQ>ac OOW COMO0T-N0'RTCD�CDO 1- co d 0 0 e- O O e- Cl O M O 11 T 1� =08i aic88 NIt*-- �ti aI��000rN�0LI m o 0 CD o 0 0 0 1- Cl 0 0 Cl IcD cD cD � cD cD cD m � cD m cD cD ' N= Q O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INNNCONNNNNNNNN M 04 a 0) 0) a) a) 0) M a) a)� CV a+ CA �IQaQaaaQaaQQaQ 2 U Q aQamQQQQQQaQQ F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- zzzQzzzZzzzzz �» > >»»»» �aaaOaaaaaaaaa �'ggggggggggggg 0 Q 0 W N o > z w z o I-°o �a ao°1°ZF-o? ULLOfQ0oQ»q� QpODU cn< 00 D Q W—QWw9mmQ—W� W z W O J W w W W_ s->—>C95Q>XN>>>U—' -0Q�aga000wQQam BOOM OCDOmmOOOO �BIMMN�CDrNONa OO A tP.3C.4N00M ti W 0 z w < a oa Z O U~ Q w Z W D N C9 Q U O JN OQw YUIX W zp� �2 Umcnw OzNZoN0 d LL �gZY a�� JZQ cNi� 0 ��0 gQQaZ)=pw 0 cw CZQ�IQ—�Z00ZZWWI� �,'N C CA zW— O —wW W �m7- ��gU=cnwaWQm°Of .af-QQaMOO MWWc -F- 0mmC)WC)r-QWw(DNOO �0wM��0M't I-NN0.- IOCDtitiCD0tir-NtiI-CDO N0ww0�0CDMWCDCD'IT 0000000000000 05 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 5 � 02 U � 1 OF [M� TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCI FROM: JERRY HERMAN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: MARCH 19, 2002 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2002 Attached please find a copy of the Community Development Report which outlines the current cases processed by staff for the month of February. 25 , PAMonthly Department Report.wpd 1 F- Z cw G H a a 0 z w 2 CL J w W H Z D O U N 0 N LU LL Z O — V Q Z O H C.� ch W a� a� a) a) CD (1) aD m (1) (1) aD (D (1) a) + +.j +r +J +j +-j +-j +.i +, +r +i +# +i +-j E E E E E E E E E E E E E E :3 = : :3 :3 :3 > W W W N 0 U N N e- N N N N N N r-- O V- r- O N It CO N O O O W C a. i a) C C U H O E �, c E cn WM am) C c o. n +-+ a) N C C N O cE E cu O Q UEO W a cu c, cn N a) +'' rn C N O Q E cav a� U E s a q a� Q a� CO Z U C 0 U O U N .0 C '> C co O cN O :DO C O (D + a) LL U 0 � F- (n N w N O U) U N a0 C O 'O a) a.c Q c Q M CN N cV l\ r— N U 00 U'� QCL u \ 3 O O N C > c +� ° '+� c Q0U QU , 00 N M N (p I� a)O 0 U U U CLUULn >O a a Q a NQ ON O N N U U a-U O cu O .c N () a� QN 't c0 C C co N — N a) L- Q 0) C a) O i cn O +-j 'C co O J Q (D CDQ O N N Lr) N a) "C +r (� O .0 c U� � O O> O tm N O c C 0 t� CO O 0 .� O a' O .0 C _C "a >� C J C E �= p N v co _>"O C— a) > a)� O U'L- U ca co O L O C 'co C Np`.a N 4-1OQ CO +W cn a) L-2 CO N° a--+ O � M J° `~ Q C L O �� C Q O -O a) -p C C O O C V C O E �/ C co a, O O Co N Cl)O a) — +1 N N C a) m a-0 a) O CL C O O C c c p (fl C O ) O -p C U C >O L L C O ,� - - N N Cn 0 �+ �+ Co O L -C N c N N 0 0 O � co O a O cu 'c a — y +_ N L .0 rn X a) � C +, +� a) C: m Q a c e O � >' o 3 > u) t c U> Q E O ai cl)— c� O a) Q c O O C a) 0 coN � co ° 060 cc ° O O cn v O a ON a) M O o00 > O n O O ON 'p a N cn L O c cA `� CU U) O Co v' O C C � CC O � t N N C C O C L }' U O �� co �Q-Q � L °�� "� L > °Q� 0�oQaQ > cn > j ' +CojU ww � CL � O d p o U a' NN�� 5 ��C 0 Z 0 Q) V/ CL 0 (1) O -CN O cy) O N XCL N c (n cD a)NQ > O Y c r 00 Q o cn O Q O O M N N a)co OM2 Oaf r O't N O't N M s Q� CL o a-o CL o O cn a) C7 O a C7 N C7 N CL F- Q 2j 0 0 11 3 N N > > > Cl. aVa " ° a 00NN O- 0004 r- r- N U �UU 2CL 4 O > c c NN O0 --O co l\ N 1 UUco a- N O > > O ° C- aaa NNO 00 00 _ � � N 1 UU aU CD q) 0 0QQ a Qa, QQ , -,LO � r N UU CU -p > > O O a CL a Q N �O `— N N r- ' UU aU �'� �n E-C j O p 0 0 p L 'c o �- ++ (� p C G CD _ CM N O .c N NE L cn CD N � C M C N(n C •c O O o c o(U N o co v = N a� 0 0 0 N a,,, �..� O � y O U Q CN N 2 7 0 M O co C V- w- }r CY)�' L 'c O >. L N G a c E N p 16� L +1 O E c {= .0 o O -a c O O' o Q co O oo c cn U m -o U � c _O a c O ( O N NCO> O OO+ O o p C c co oCOLN O. +.— 4 , o +�i (U°o ca N °c a °-0 o - o 0 Cr D U+ s o E o E a a n O> cs0O = (i >+ i= %�'' C � Q ._- NN > E cn OC) rn O� L}a, ca a cn N >Q Z QaY Q~ cO c>a>ac-0o �LaC 00 Lo >O c o � — ,o°D c .—�- •c7v co N N O N N a N � +r C.) (� -0OO OC N cC~4-- N> N N O c '_Qn C " N .0O N NO O O cn +', r a) > LL O > A OCD O O a a) c r CDC ' (Lo+, co y�No o +•' OQ� M N �= p C c co m O E ; a} U c •o c O• co +-+ p C c c� , O C O N N O 0 cn •+� c C a O p co N '+� (� s N +� N N _N s -pp C N cn N cn N c O to Q p U N p U N p C: J 0 C U C N 2 E� N O -0-)co U +� (n U U E i� O U "O E Q CO c N C O cn E O o cn N C N (n w c M E Q cn •a; � E E a � i — Fo- co N c Co •O MO C O 04 N O OM O C00 cn p CL [fiCY) N � O r d N O O 00 O CD N M M C N N o cL- U O c aQ. Co` F-U(z F-oo0 U)-j (D4*0 C7U N >O > ° L L- aaa Q a Q 0 N r' U cr Q CL U a) > -p O> a0 Q a NQ C)N O I-- N U Q CL a) > 'p O> QO Q a Na O N O �((V N U Q 0- a) > O> a0 a s NQ N O �N `� N U cr Q a NO M C M 'c a) = N O CD 0 a) > a a N O CO N N a- a) > a a N O N N CL a) > a a N O CO N N CL O _� a .c c O '� U CL Q cn +� ° °o 0 }' 0 0 �° m ° 0 o c '� ° 0 �? m o o 0 0 C c -0 o c cv O o `n cC Q a-Cp+a CL ` +aLU)Q LO Wa)0+ cn C o c - Fu 0 c CD � 0 E 0 o ° o a0> o E ava � I� °°_L c Q ° N0 a) n m o a >c Co MNo > a c> �c , +, a 'O C w- m C cn L. °" L 00 O ' U) 0 C ca a) cv � C a) CL cOn 0 a) cn L O a) 0 Z c 0 U +_ N L. M 00 0 N C C L_ O 0 C ai ' FL O O •.p-0 o c6 Y � -0 a) -C +-� > LQ ._ N a- a)LO d� N 0 C cn O L. N�' 0 �0., N � IN C M N 0 � c_ O)cn V U N C N O C� O L O °) p' a)cn -° C C s U-C (n *a E O L W L. a 0) CL c° 0 0 c C 0 O a 0 0 0 o f N CD 0 0 �?-C > 0 ac w •ate �� c � 4-1 � � CU cn -p ca m-C a cn ,} (u� N 4' C 3 LO O � c cn V o 0._ 0 0 0 ;►= L- cn t' N - C c6 cn 0 E O O 76 p 0 p V V U U y 0 cn NCD p O +-+ O U H U C C cn C C -O cn O V c� U cv c� 0 . U +i fl- O a) C `p CD a ° ° a O cU _ ° cn E O W rn cu ;D c � -0 M � 0 cu a� U � N � a� 0 � % +.� cn 0 ° c � � cn � rn U }, � E CO -CL in 0 V 0 O D +r 0 cn 0 � +-, O o. o 'cn O N C O Y N .�_ C C 0— O 0 ca p E rn c: O C m c � cn OC OC a CC a U) OC cn (n CC 0- Q 'cn ii cn 0 > � C U U U- Ir J C O In L O N w C a) e-0 AWa♦ Oh 0 -�o �c om c c E � 0 c a CL N ~ J C7 co N N N Y Q N 0 U M> cM c I� I� I� Oj 0 O a) I O 0 rL IL rL � cn , v N (0 00 0. O O 0) O O O O O O O c 0 'cn c 0 O' O v O O N C N N C" ) M }, O L. O N jE N O > a- a a M o N> U a QO a� 0`>� 0 0� a. Q v Qs CL U) D O w N 0 M > (n M M (n (n U CD 0 (n co 00 tn a) a E o U .0 C O U _ a Q O > O a a Q � N (p N � C cNn C a)'+-� +•+ a cn E 0 U a a� L .0 CO •+.+ U a CL Q o a a >, a a`) O +� O cc X m v C L > .E Cl)'L ° (Oj �� E VU N CO a) °' CU °�"� ° o i V M L N (") pp L -p O (n o +� o c C ° cn C :3 O '+- N " O (o +.1 N '0 C C a) i Ln c C co. N aa)) > co a) s o c� L O o C,a� N oc .0 �a cfla +M a co •� •> -C L C co �11 'L L i1 Q � N y _ ca C� C . _ L ° O� O Co :3 O d Coo J a) y 'O O � .0 w-- O N "O O O N O O a) J +_+ co O +- V O c C a) O a) c �,, O LL � c CC J N LL O .0 O Z r- C •- O N c� .v •� J C a) a O O N C 'N J E < > a C — > 0 � m x s 0 O = 0 LJJ U r 00 o ° U � • O� cy) N N 0 o O C Q. N M = O cr O m O° M w C ON � C CL U cv EW oos r- F- CC 0 G. W y D Q `- V W n O CL J Q V a cn _O a M cM co p c ci 0 cII) m C) co N m 0 i co 0 as as CL a � � o � o0° v o c qt 0 +r ol c '' o 0*= n 0 0 c o ct 0 0 E C) Q M a � � � J Y L O y.. W U) O O Ci O x o aCL �, c c 5 CL Q d o �o •C aEi CL a W 4aCL � � •O C •OC � C � a % a H 0 > m m oC m m m C7 Q W C7 W Z L CL as o O V H � i J •V V •C� (,� O O U. N IM •C N ++ ` o H a a F- = 2 2 E a o CD U p t O a> �—T— DEPARTMENT REPORT: 4 INCORPORATo OF T9 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: DODIE HORVITZ, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR DATE: MARCH 19, 2002 SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2002 UPCOMING EVENTS OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL 2002: April 1 *Free Energy Assistance April 1 Spring Break, Camelot Park April 1 *Quicken Computer Class April 1 *Monthly Putting Contest April 2 Spring Break, Sports Day at Fritz Burns Park April 2 *New Line Dance Class April 2 *Free AARP Tax Assistance Seminar April 3 Spring Break, Park Party Picnic April 4 Spring Break, The Movies April 5 Knott's Soak City, Palm Springs April 5 Village Fair in La Quinta, Country Western Jam April 5 *New Leather Craft Class April 8 *Tennis Koffee Klatch April 9 *Free AARP Tax Assistance April 9 *Dog Training Classes April 9 *Free Health Screenings April 10 *Braille Institute's Mobile Unit April 10 *Senior Sports Day April 15 *Monthly Putting Contest April 15 Beginning Computers, Senior Center April 16 *Free Hearing Consultations April 17 Intermediate Computers, Senior Center April 18 *Free Medicare and Insurance Counseling April 18 *Free Legal Consultation April 18 *Volunteer Recognition Luncheon April 19 *Free HI -CAP Counseling April 20 Mastering Microsoft Access, Senior Center April 23 Conversational Italian for Travelers, Senior Center April 23 *AARP Mature Driving April 23 Jazzercize Classes, La Quinta High School April 24 Hatha Yoga, Senior Center April 25 Chamber Mixer, Civic Center Courtyard April 26 Multi -Generational Talent Show, Senior Center April 27 Community Parade. Avenida Bermudas April 27 Community Picnic and Birthday Bash, Fritz Burns Park April 27 Arts & Crafts Show, Senior Center April 27 Cove Oasis Trial Hike, Cove Oasis April 27 Star Gazing, Cove Oasis Trailhead April 27 Fishing Derby Kickoff, Lake Cahuilla April 28 Gem of the Desert Run 5K/10K, Fritz Burns Park April 28 Entertainment and Fireworks, La Quinta High School Football Stadium *Daytime Senior Center class or activity Community Services Department Attendance Report for the Month of January 2002 Summary Sheet Program 2002 2001 Variance Sessions Per Month 2002 2001 Leisure Classes 424 267 157 32 17 Special Events 92 139 -47 2 2 Adult Sports 1092 447 645 20 10 Senior Center 2551 2291 260 138 128 Total 4159 3144 1015 192 157 Senior Services Senior Center 480 518 -38 15 15 Total 480 518 -38 15 15 Sports Complex Use LQ AYSO (all stars) 800 675 125 20 10 LQ Sports & Youth 500 400 100 6 4 Total 1,300 1075 225 26 14 Total Programs 51939 4,737 1202 233 186 Volunteer Hours Senior Center 924 858 66 Community Services 8 0 0 Total Volunteer Hours 932 858 66 Monthly Revenue Senior Center $ 10,535.00 $ 6,673.00 $ 3,862.00 Community Services $ 5,096.00 $ 4,753.00 $ 343.00 Total Revenue $ 15,631.00 $ 11,426.00 $ 4,205.00 Revenue Year to Date Senior Center $ 61,222.00 $ 44,485.00 $ 16,737.00 Community Services $ 45,731.00 $ 41,342.00 $ 4,389.00 Total Revenue to Date $1061953.00 $ 85,827.00 $ 21,126.00 ?63 u U 3 Community Services Program Report for February 2002 2002 2002 2001 2001 2002 2001 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Sessions Sessions Leisure Classes Beginning Computers 8 32 10 30 2 4 3 Intermediate Computers 4 12 5 15 -3 3 3 Iffy Biddy Sports 5 10 0 0 10 2 0 Jazzercize 10 40 0 0 40 4 0 Hatha Yoga 35 210 27 108 102 6 4 Adobe Photoshop 3 6 0 0 6 .2 0 Latin Ballroom Dance 16 32 24 96 -64 2 4 English Horse Back 6 12 6 12 0 2 2 Art of Painting 7 21 0 0 21 3 0 Microsoft Excel 7 7 6 6 1 1 1 Italian for Travelers 14 42 0 0 42 3 0 Totals 1151 4241 781 267 1571 32 117 1 1 2002 2002 2001 2001 2002 2001 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Sessions Sessions Special Events Annual Pet Show 40 40 30 30 10 1 1 Mexico Excursion 1 521 521 1091 109 -57 1 1 Totals 1 921 921 1391 139 -47 2 2 2002 2002 2001 2001 2002 2001 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Sessions Sessions Adult Sports Open Basketball 292 292 87 87 205 16 7 Adult Soccer League 1 2001 8001 120 360 440 4 3 Totals 1 4921 10921 2071 4471 6451 201 10 Recreation Totals 1 6991 16081 4241 8531 7551 541 29 Page 2 uV� Senior Center Attendance 2002 2002 2001 2001 R istered Total Registered Total Meetings Participants articipation Participants Participation Variance 2002 2001 Senior Activities ACBL Bridge 320 320 301 301 19 4 4 Bridge, Duplicate/Social 561 561 546 546 15 10 10 Dog Training, Complimentary 4 4 13 13 -9 1 1 Ice Cream Social 34 34 55 55 -21 5 3 Knitting Guild Club 8 8 0 0 8 1 0 Monthly Birthday Party 38 38 33 33 5 1 1 Monthly Luncheon 100 100 90 90 10 1 1 Movie Time 60 60 76 76 -16 8 4 Nabisco Putting Contest 122 122 105 105 17 1 1 Putting Contest 8 8 9 9 -1 1 1 Tennis Social 5 5 19 19 -14 1 1 Senior Activity Total 1260 1260 1247 1247 13 34 27 Senior Leisure Courses Ballroom Dance 22 64 18 40 24 8 3 Blackjack Plus 4 4 0 0 4 1 0 Ceramics 13 27 11 29 -2 4 4 Computer 31 36 39 54 -18 9 15 Cooking 19 16 0 0 16 1 0 CPR Class 13 13 0 0 13 1 0 Dog Training Class 11 15 19 21 -6 2 3 Exercise 61 478 58 409 69 11 11 Music Magic 4 17 14 22 -5 4 4 Spanish Lessons 37 98 10 16 82 6 4 Stained Glass 10 16 9 12 4 2 2 Watercolor 12 38 12 43 -5 4 4 Senior Leisure Courses Total 237 822 190 646 1761 53 50 Senior Leisure Classes Arts and Crafts 19 19 24 24 -5 4 4 Bridge Lessons 205 205 146 146 59 12 8 Computer Tutor 8 8 10 10 -2 7 10 Creative Writing 15 15 8 8 7 4 4 Golden Tones 50 50 53 53 -3 3 4 Painting 31 31 20 20 11 4 4 Quilting 40 40 43 43 -3 4 4 Rug Hooking 4 4 5 5 -1 2 3 Tai Chi 44 44 39 39 5 4 4 Tap Dance 29 29 24 24 5 4 3 Woodcarving 24 24 26 26 -2 3 3 Senior Leisure Classes Total 469 469 398 398 71 51 51 TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAMS 1966 2551 1835 2291 260 138 128 Senior Services A.A.R.P. "55 Alive" 40 40 52 52 -12 2 2 A.A. R. P. Tax Aide 51 51 49 49 2 4 4 Ambassadors 73 73 71 71 2 n/a n/a FIND Food Distribution 255 255 298 298 -43 4 4 Health Screenings 15 15 31 31 -16 1 2 Hearing Consultation 3 3 4 4 -1 1 1 I.I.D. Energy Assistance 13 13 4 4 9 n/a n/a I.I.D. Energy Assistance/No fee 8 8 3 3 5 n/a n/a Legal Consultation 7 7 0 0 7 1 0 Medicare/Hi Cap Consultation 8 8 3 3 5 n/a n/a Share Meetings/Sign-up 7 7 3 3 4 2 2 TOTAL SENIOR SERVICES 480 480 518 518 -381 15 '15 SENIOR CENTER TOTAL 2446 3031 2353 2809 222 153I r3 Page 3 I Bounk � � I ,,, 12 va a0m, I TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Roy F. Stephenson, P.E., Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: March 19, 2002 RE: Public Works/Engineering Department Report for the Month of February 2002 Attached please find the following: 1. Citizen Service Request Summary; 2. Encroachment Permit and Plan Check Services Summary; 3. Capital Improvement Plan Status Update. Ro F. Stephe son, E. Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer T:\PWDEPI\COUNCIL\2002\020319Dept.wpd H Z LU CEO a w 0 0 2 J m a N O O N q- El m w LL Q t U a H LU Tr 71 to; �4 1 ` 00 H z w Q� � oc za :=;a cY o J Cl) L 00 t� v J m a N O O N Q 2 z 0 w a z w t� a N O O N q- :-i U) J H 0 w U w V z a J a U O F- X O a w w 0 w w w U w H O n w lz H n w 0 w w 3 213 v 003 0 CL a �Z OIJ t c. ,*n Z O LV C� uw O at IL Q F- a Q v O LO O C .� O 0 0� C .` O O N y ovZ O M 7 -p p A CY)~ = p p �• — p p U L n c°n O N a �' , U L — cn 4L U cn — n N c N o O a; co QL C O o cn U �. O� O c a� c O co s c O. U O c 0 CD U U N O :, U O p N O r U E U v� rnU c O� a c rn c CL , +� c� aD M U O L Lu o = N c C M C C7 p ;+r O Co W C7 p m (� O m M O C -p_ N O J (o L N C L U U 'p V L N p U in O Q Co O 'cn U O Q +, Q C CO m O fo C co U of c U a� U ds LA C i n cn N Y � }' O C m v L- � O O *j Co m +•' C O M 0 cn X N p) Co *' C O m Qc- cn C o U C O O 'O ~ o N cn _N °' Q p 00 O `° ° °° p o °° + , �" co N U o f +•+ - �, co p 0 E U cn C L a� E cn U+% CL a) U U +� U u CD M U C U %+� p CL O p o CL1� p co O (� O O •S CV p p C CM .+� C-0 C 6 '+� C H p N C c 0 Co c �. U U V Q cLo Ln o y c °) M O U , +3 0 0 c� w O +, U U O O c rn a cn o�W *-' a c 6)C �� cH >o �c Qo 0 a� c r O co — co — L c co o �M U) co OU 0> OU cVn.� Lug i'� CL) Lug �� L1I v O 7 N 0 U J �, "O O 'a O C L C +, J O O C N L C +; U O \ ` L L co C H p t a Y o V N O 0 O C Y V cn cn 'p L- O O Y U O m 2 •C .N O m o co U C 0 p 0 C +., C L c V i o c c r o c "U c- E °� c;, Lu � c+ c a O U O° 7 CL o cm a -0 co N N oo > -o �' N O°° aUcna O N o �,-o U O O +r ° O DUtna. U N O° DUOL O om -p N N O N O N N N O O O O LO �-- N a) CN O 0 O O N Cj) Cc O O O N r- O d O OO O O O O O N O r.. co co c0 `- cc00 o a M a) O VN Ln N V- V- V— O O CO M T- I� oo O O N O n O O �o C LU 0 00 O O O M O O Q M N N CO 0) N 00 N V- m O cn CL cocu C cu H E -C a' CoN N (� U cn j m O cco (/) +.� W +1 a) cN n- Q m U= O s co n— Q C U 'p C cn LU CO U O > o cn cn o. ccoo cc 0) 4 =3 U U CLCL CL CLcm U) C v) �N p O L CD N O N O �. y y a� N r- �N O �N O V CO 0 a y E O N 00 p CO 0 L 0 O O 0o C 00 C 00 O 0 E- CO O � � O N vi O N vi C w U Q -0 N� � OoC O 00 � O COo CaC CV C CO a) T O' O O Cm OM V � Ci +•N oo CO S 't O N� O fn C � �O O U -O 0 U 4 v C) `c` O N O O p� 4 U O c � Q "O � .� "O Oa CO 4) CD O U W L N (O +•r i O C I- rn o' m p U "O a O in O N LLJ a -p LO v> �- "O O (D C;) O 0 O -p � U a-% N U)-je O O C N +� o r_ O O M C cO a 06 O O�, O O� c a) 0 Q E c 0 O V � a�i N C a� COCuU) o 0 O O a)� - y Q � CO ±' O CO ' CO C +j p) c c U O N O Ca O O a) cn C / � "0 C C LL C Ui C Y O o H 'O cO > C Y >, vi L O'a U -C C O C C) = Cim 0 C p O ' 0 U j C p CO Z a .� C q) ►- N LL U O, E O, E �- U p) O O cn +r O �, ++ O C O +r y O O i O (O L CO +r c >..� �, c U c M Cu CO a c c c cca � v +� v +� V) C cO O C C C '+� y � cn C O p O M O DUtnQ o N O O O 0U� cn O O O 0UU a, C (nQ N 0O m (n N p 0� r N O p 0Um O O CL L- a)O CL 'p N N CV N C'M N '�t M C C O O O O O O O O LO 00 n i m LO LO a`) O O O O O O O O N LQ d' Nt LO (D LO rl- O O 4-1 -� O O O O N O O N � N N N N � O N a) .0 O .0 -0 E -0 E a) a)r- l"� O O Q� O a� N O r- .- r 00 O M M O N O M I� M It O T- O r- V- t� N O C'M O M O CO L LI In N LA LA V- a M 00 N M N O N M oV" r- CO r- r- r- = CO N M W r- O i-� C }1 O v Lf) V, �..i A+ W O W/ VN a)U m 0 (/� Cu Q C +� C O ? Cn `_ �_ a CO LO LLl G G Q �- C J o L CO a� s a� U a) m N a E CL CL N =p Q 0 Q Q Q >> .(D 0 > �L, QQ C to a w 2 -� Q oC Q (n S 01 jU Q U LO LL N O N 005 c M CO O O -o Q) "a C + O� L)� O. = O O LOE > 'E C �O Q O O L U U U p +J L. a -sem cU O O s O UO �O O 0 ccC.) W co c Cc O � U p U U p 't M nO CDy �O O +, 0 co It p o Uc y O V0 M co 6. 0 0V a�co �� O O U = C c.O U M >, O C co 0 00 N Oda. � � -per O c� O ++ O rn Y O U p) — c. N 'E �— •• c0 O a) +� rn N O Q _ UJ y wC D U D > Q +' EO O a) ca ' C LO M O E c: }' m _O p) Q) U c UO E 0 06 u L Q) c0 __ 0 N W y E dS O Q) p D U Q L p Ln n• c Q 0) U) ' +-' C 0 O = . E OL C pc av fU cn •Q� O �N No N Yc CY) o ��.i L % W O c0 rn ` lA O co0 c O Q(T— 'p a) c6 yQ cac C U+, co-0 =�0 -v�O FO+•,O ZLU 0��EcQEn) O 2 0 co 4-E-C p U) 0 O a) ca QU L— O p c o cM U•O d .V Q C 00 � C Q) O +' U E °' E }' C a C E O C C E C Uc0 c c0 L Lu `� N • • N O) O 'cn •� O C �' N Q) C •y C '� C) Q) L '� "0 '—` cm L >• .y a? N v) L Q) .y O1 , C U a� _ O a) N aD w-aa.m �00 0 �CLN 0ua) DUwCL 0- CL 0-00 0�0 OU cV LO N O N O a) c 04 0 O O O O O N 00 E O 0 O I N C") O O N O O 0 0 O O N O O ac U) IA a) O O O O `— N -p N V— M O O O C O O O O O �j �O N N 00 N O O O cc O O O O O O N O NN 00 Ids O O NO �— O O a) I- O I- O O O O It 00 O 00 O N W LO V' O O c O (") •— LO O ('M 00 m � v} �• ors � � �n � � N �' c0 Co +C/) -0 cn C N U) i-, E C Q) _ ca C p 0 L C) O a) C C O O > E E O C. F— a� c0 U y E �c o �_ L N•, 0 0cr. +LU > C O C> Q .O Q) Q C Q) Q) "� C C p a) Co >• a C p) a � -p a) O LL L a' En O cn Q) E O +•+ y O m w C (n C J to Co � `� E cv >' Q > `'- � LU L U C co a. L co Q) I- m L + a. U) +L� E U U) ca +L� .` �: cn 0 •O CL co N LO 06 cB O > a. J o ` O cn O > N U a) OM y � O c O \ N LL O U � C } 4 a) O .0 LL Q a) C Co s L- O 00 -p y Co cn ++ C O cn U - c N .c O Q O 0 0 O C O O y N O _O `� +-' a)U O am' s C � o ' 0 O 0 C � 06 o •O C '� a a 0 O 0 O C U 0 � ,� S S O a) to C c a) +j d' a r a) O 0 U � d� dNjy N a� a) (D �E �E aV L L 0 L CD *. CD a) a) +r N Q) a) 0 o O +r C a) .O ++ O L O L O L 00 LO LO LLB d' 00 W O N C7 M e- 0) LO N m LO J F- ~ V O a) U U W 0 r +-a L +., +i 0 co E 0 J> a m 0 o c> o O O L L Q LL. 2 U � E � - --j I 007 DEPARTMENT REPORT: CITY OF LA Q UINTA POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FEBRUARY 2002 • Significant number of arrests and recovery of stolen property by La Quinta SET Team. • Felony assaults show increase over same time last year. 27 City of La Quinta La Quinta Police Department Captain John Horton, Commanding February 2002 Highlights (Numbers in parenthesis denotes number of calls for service that day) Friday, 02-01_-02 (62): Walter Salas Reyes, 11/18/78, of La Quinta arrested in the area of Vallejo and Nogales for P.A.L. for Burglary. Grand theft from unlocked vehicle @ the 79000 block of Horseshoe, taken was a scanner/ boots and briefcase. An envelope containing a white powdery substance was sent to Ruby Cosenza @ the 44000 block of Calle Santa Barbara, CDF/Haz Mat responded and concluded that incident was a hoax. Petty theft occurred @ the 78000 block of Irwin Cir.at 1030 hrs, taken was a 150-1b. Gry/Blu ceramic elephant statue from front yard. Saturday, 02-02-02 (57): Corporal Injury to Spouse. Maximlilano Velasquez (35yrs / of La Quinta) was arrested for striking his wife on the left side of the face. He was booked at Indio Jail. Dep. Burns. Shoplifting at Walmart. Jose Prieto (HM / 21) and three juveniles all of Ripley were cite released. Dep. Speir Sunday, 02-03-02 (51). Assault with a Deadly Weapon @ the 53000 block of Calle Alvarado. Christopher Mc Mullen (21yrs / of La Quinta) attacked his roommates with a maglight flashlight. He was booked at Indio Jail. Farley Monday, 02-04-02 (47): 72 Hour Psychiatric Evaluation. Nereida Ortiz (25yrs / of La Quinta) was dependant over her husband's affair and threatened suicide. She was transported to Indio Mental Health. Dep. Eckhardt Auto Theft Recovery. An informant provided information on the location of several stolen vehicles. With the assistance of R.A.I.D. Team officers' two stolen vehicles and other property was recovered. Stacy Lynne Thomas (34yrs / of Palm Desert) and Robert Terrel (40yrs / of Palm Desert) were arrested for auto theft and possession of stolen property. Dep. Diaz. DUI @ Ave. 48 & Madison. Cynthia Hampton (50yrs / of Portland Ore) was booked at Indio Jail. Her B.A.C. was .18. Dep. Coleman, Tuesday, 02-05-02 (41): Traffic collision �)a 48th and Mira Flores, PCF Running stop sign. Wednesday, 02-06-02 (60): Burglary (Beer Run) @ the 78000 block of Calle Tampico, Circle K. Alex Suarez was arrested for robbery @ the 52000 bock of Ave. Carranza. A .380 auto was found in the residence; which was reported lost out of IPD. Thursday,_02-07-02 (50): Burglary (garage) @ the 47000 block of Via Montana, through unlocked side door, taken was a bicycle. Burglary (Vehicle and Garage) @ the 79000 block of Starflower, taken was a metal detector; nextel phone; CD's; saltwater fishing poles and drill. Friday, 02-08-02 (67): Walley Venecia, 21 yrs, of Thermal and Melissa Placentia, 19 yrs, of Indio were arrested for on -sight burglary (Vehicle) at Marigold and Buttercup, within the Cactus Flower Housing Tract in the north end of the city. Pry tools and stolen items located. ID responded to process scene. Both suspects have history of theft. (Good job by Deputy C. Olsen #2599). Petty theft @ the 51000 block of Ave Vallejo, taken was a purse from on top of a vehicle. Hit and run with injuries @ Adams and Miles, victim sustained neck injury and transported to JFK, suspect vehicle was found on Darby and was reported as a vehicle theft, 10 minutes after T/C. Saturday, 02-09-02 (53) Spousal Battery @ the 46000 block of Dune Palms. Noe Medina (24yrs / of La Quinta) was arrested for throwing gasoline on and physically attacking his wife. Dep. Farley. Sunday, 02-10-02 (39): Public Intoxication @ the 54000 block of Ave. Alvarado. Robert Paleo (33yrs / of La Quinta) was arrested for public intoxication during a domestic verbal argument with his wife. He was advised not to go in public in his intoxicated condition and failed to comply. Dep. Leary. Shoplifting a7 Wal-Mart. Maria Trejo (21yrs / of Indio) was cited and released. Dep. Donivan. Psychiatric evaluation @ the 51000 block of Cortez. Trinidad Vera (24yrs / of La Quinta) who has a history of mental illness became violent when he failed to take his medication. Dep.Diaz. Monday, 02-11-02 (31): Shoplift @ Wal-Mart. Oscar Valenzuela (19yrs / of Coachella) Cited and released. Tuesday, 02-12-02_(391: Grand theft of four tires and rims from veh. Parked in front of residence @ the 52000 block of Ave Vallejo. Victim Ricardo Perez. Pablo Gutierrez, a 19 yr old gang member of Indio and his 15-yr old brother arrested after being found sitting in a veh. on the LQHS campus with 11357 H&S and a loaded stolen .22 cal. (Good on -sight by SRO Dep. Morton) Wednesday, 02-13-02 (39): Matthew Krause, 11 /03/77 of 909, arrested for public intoxication @ Calle Chihuahua and Ave. Montezuma. Jorge L. Maduena, arrested for parole hold and grand theft warrant on a traffic stop @ Calle Chihuahua and Ave. Montezuma. Prowler @ the 51000 block of Ave. Mendoza #B @ 2000 hrs. Petty theft @ the 50000 block of Washington #IA, @ 2150 hrs. Two HMA suspects, 18-23 yrs. with shaved heads seen fleeing from victims vehicle. Suspect vehicle was a burgundy, 1990 Dodge Intrepid. Traffic collision (single vehicle) @ Hwy I I I and Auto Center Dr., PCF failure to maintain a straight course of travel. Thursday, 02-14-02 (53): Burglary (Vehicle), @ the 52000 block of Ave Carranza, between 02/13/02, 1900 and 02/14/02, 0600. Taken was a stereo. Two vehicle burglaries (Veh.), @ the 44000 block of Via Del Sol, occurred between 0213 and 0715 hrs. blunt instrument used for entry, taken were both in -dash CD players and door speakers from one vehicle. Petty theft @ the 44000 block of Blazing Star Tr., between 1400 and 1530 hrs, taken were two cement lion statues from the front porch. Burglary (Residence), @ the 51000 block of Eisenhower Dr., entry through bedroom window, taken was a game box; (2) cable boxes; and a computer tower. German Barreras Valdez, 08/03/55, arrested for public intoxication and resisting officers @ Herrera and Madrid. Friday, 02-15-02 (51): Burglary (Veh.) @ the 52000 block of Ave Velasco, passenger window broken with rock, taken was a purse. Burglary (Resd.) @ the 51000 block of Ave Bermudas, taken was a scanner,. Point of entry was rear door. Robert New, 11/14/39, from 907 was arrested for shoplifting @ Wal-Mart. Juan Perez, 08/01/60, from 909 was arrested for shoplifting @ Wal-Mart. Saturday, 02-16-02 (60): No significant activity. Sunday, 02-17-02 (53): No significant Activity Monday, 02-18-02 (49): Burglary @ 54-000 Blk Oak Tree (P.G.A. West Country Club). A large amount of Jewelry and a firearm was stolen from a residence. A few hours after the burglary was reported Chris Jackson Jr. and Brandon Wyatt (both 21yrs / of Indio) attempted to pawn some of the stolen jewelry at Rockey's Pawnshop in Indio. Both subjects were taken into custody. The La Quinta Target Team continued the investigation and located a third suspect Michele Wegener (29yrs / of Indio) in possession of more stolen property at a motel on Indio Blvd. About $45,000.00 of stolen property and a firearm were recovered. All three suspects were booked at Indio Jail. The investigation is continuing. Sergeant Ammons Tuesday, 02-19-02 50): Burglary @ the 79000 block of Old Ave 52, taken was a man's bike; and $150.00 in floor tile. Petty theft (Veh) @7a the 78000 block of Galaxy Dr., vehicle unlocked, taken was a gate transponder to Starlight Dunes. Petty theft (Veh) @ the 78000 block of Skyward Way. taken was a gate transponder to Starlight Dunes; garage opener; and a cell -phone. Petty theft and burglary (Garage) @ the 78000 block of Galaxy Dr., suspects entered unlocked veh. in driveway and removed a garage door and gate opener and cell -phone, entry was then made into the garage where a chop saw/ jigsaw and a concrete nailer were taken. Petty theft and burglary (Garage) @ the 44000 block of Tortola Cir. taken was a door opener; and (2) rolls of quarters from an unlocked vehicle. Grand theft @ Wal-Mart, taken was a purse from a shopping cart, suspect observed entering LQHS but officers were unable to locate. Petty theft (Veh) @ the 78000 La Palma, taken was a garage door opener and cell -phone. 459 PC (Res), @ the 45000 block ofBirchcrest Cir. entry through unlocked slider, taken were DVD's; computer and a laptop computer. Wednesday, 02-20-02 (60): No significant activity. Thursday, 02-21-02 (S 1); While conducting a burglary suppression program, La Quinta Target Team members arrested Jose Enrique Legaspe, 21 yrs; Andres Hernandez Contreras, 18 yrs; and Jose Jesus Legaspe, 19 yrs. all from Thermal. The suspects were charged with (2) counts of burglary (Veh); possession of stolen property; attempt vehicle theft; possession of burglary tools and illegal possession of a loaded firearm. (Investigation continuing) Mail theft @ the 44000 block of Ocotillo. Petty theft of (Veh), @ the 47000 block of Via Jardin, vehicle unlocked, money taken from ash tray. Traffic collision (non -injury) @}a Fred Waring and Adams St., PCF red light violation. Donny Allen Yanez, 09/29/75, arrested for vehicle theft and parole hold. Vehicle taken from 78-300 Galaxy Dr. (Starlight Dunes). Vehicle located by IPD a few minutes later @ 82-366 Rebecca Ct., Indio. via the on board northeaster system. Friday, 02-22-0� Z (71), Bryan Monterosa, 11/19/76, transient, arrested for public intoxication @7a the 79000 block of Desert Willow During an occupied vehicle check at LQHS by SRO Deputy Morton, he found (4) non students in possession of marijuana/ meth/and a sawed off shotgun, Arrested were: 1) George Tello, 06/28/82 from Indio for driving without a license; poss. of marijuana; having a firearm on school grounds and unauthorized alteration of a weapon. 2) Felipe Tello Jr., 07/21/81, from Indio for having a firearm on school ground and for committing a felony while released on bail or recognizance (subject is currently out on bail for robbery) 3) Ernesto Avila, 09/20/82, from Coachella for firearm on school grounds and committing a felony while released on bail or recognizance. 4) Jesus Portillo, 11/03/81, from Coachella for pass. of control substance; firearm on school grounds and felony committed while released on bail or recognizance. Rocio Maldonado, 11/13/82; and Alma Campos, 04/06/86, arrested for shoplifting @ Wal-Mart Saturday, 02-23-02 36 Assault / Public Intoxication @ Home Depot. Off Duty Investigator Ochoa witnessed and broke up a fight in the Garden Center. The instigator, Miguel Esparza (22yrs / of La Quinta) was taken into custody. Dep. Diaz. Sunday, 02-24-0022 (M- No Significant Activity 2' Monday, 02-25-02 (50): Felony Assault @ La Quinta High School, Deputies responded to J.F.K. Hospital reference a juvenile being treated for a cerebral concussion, fractured jaw and sinus cavity damage. The juvenile was unexpectedly punched in the face by another student. Deputies Farley and Morton D.U.I. Bermudas and Chihuahua. Jose Pacheco (65yrs / of La Quinta) was booked at Indio Jail. Tuesday, 02-26-02 (63): Burglary and vandalism @ the 57000 block of Black Diamond, suspect(s) attempted to remove a large screen TV from residence, but damaged it while inside the residence. Forcing the country club side gate with a stolen vehicle made entrance into the complex Vehicle theft from the 80000 block of Hermitage, recovered at Ave 58 and Madison outside the country club. Traffic collision @ Washington and Ave 50, PCF unsafe speed. Petty theft @ the 51000 block of Ave. Villa, taken was a water pump for a fishpond in front yard. John Alfred Felix, 02/01/72, from Cathedral City, arrested @ Home Depot for burglary. Traffic collision �,7a Washington and Channel Dr., Laned roadways. Wednesday, 02-27-02 (53) Marjorie Geiger, 09/16/47, arrested for spousal abuse @ the 53000 block of Ave Mendoza. Vehicle theft @ the 44000 block of Marigold, between 02/26/02, 2030 hrs and 02/27/02, 0745 hrs. Spousal abuse @7a the 52000 block of Ave Alvarado, wife struck in leg with a piece of wood. Suspect was identified as Chris Melvin Carlson, 01/31/57. Petty theft (Veh.) @ the 54 000 block of Ave Ramirez, taken were misc. papers. Thursday, 02-28-02 (63): Antonio Garcia, 10/10/79, from Indio arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol. Total calls for service: 1468 CITY of LA QUINTA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT February 2002 SCHOOL: LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL Deputy Stephen Morton HIGHLIGHTS: o Seven arrests for fighting on school grounds. o One arrest for theft. o Two arrests for possession of marijuana.. o I contacted two non -students when they drove onto school grounds. A firearm was located, concealed on a minor. The minor and adult were arrested. o I conducted a stop on a vehicle occupied by four adult males in the school parking lot. A firearm along with marijuana and Methamphetamine was located. Four adults were arrested. o I attended the East Conference in Little Rock Arkansas. o I assisted Juvenile Probation with several students / parents meetings. o I enrolled eleven students in the Youth Accountability Team Program Actual reporting period covers January 29, 2002 through February 28, 2002. 2�0 CITY of LA QUINTA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT February 2002 SCHOOL: LA QUINTA MIDDLE SCHOOL Deputy: Robert Brooker RSO Grant Funded Position School Session: January 28th, 2002 through February 281h, 2002. HIGHLIGHTS: • I conducted a classroom presentation on Making The Right Choices In Life. As part of a social studies classroom project, I directed a classroom discussion on how making bad decisions can affect the rest of a persons life, from their health, criminal record, ability to continue their education and have the career and life style each student would like to obtain. • I conducted follow-up investigations and assisted the La Quinta Target Team in interviewing students at the Middle school. • Counseled students that violated school rules, which were not violations of state law, but were serious enough to warrant discussing the incident as a preventative measure. • Assisted the school staff with several incidents of medical aids, inappropriate behavior and comments made by one student to another. • I conducted investigations and documented incidents that occurred on the school grounds and buses that ranged from batteries, theft and misappropriation of found property. I evaluated and transported a student to mental health for 5150WIC and arrested one for possession of a pocketknife and marijuana at La Quinta High School. 281 Violations Wail to Yield urning Violations LA QUINTA POLICE MOTORCYCLE ACTIVITY REPORT PROGRAM STATISTICS FEBRUARY 2002 Prepared By: Deputy Dave Adams 69 Lane Change Violation 1 2 ] Tows 1 2 -1 1 Seat Belt Violations 2 DUI Arrests L 0 Injury T/C 0 1 Non -Injury T/C Stop Sign Violations 0 Cut Traffic for Citation 57 Suspended DL Signal Light Violations 7 Cut Traffic for Collision i 2 Non -Moving 17 Child Seat Violations 3 Warnings 1 29 1 Fatal T/C L 0 HIGHLIGHTS 020102 - T/C occurred on Washington x 48. PCF was unknown, no witnesses and conflicting statements. 020202 - T/C occurred on private property (AAA) and Cal. Vehicle Code does not apply. 021202 - Training day in Palm Desert. 021402 - Took a 459 PC - Residence for patrol. Qualified at the range later that day. 022002 -T/C occurred on private property (Stater Bros) and Cal. Vehicle Code does not apply. 022702 - Maintenacne day for the motorcycle. 2811.0 1 Riverside County Sheriff's Department La Quinta Target Team Monthly Report February 2002 Deputy Matt Jimenez, Deputy Aaron Eller, Sgt. Greg Ammons, Deputy James Armstrong The following is a summary of the Target Team activities for the month of February. Ongoing Investigations 4 Arrests/ Filings 21 Vehicle checks 8 Business Contacts 3 Investigation assists 4 Arrest Warrants Served 8 Arrest Warrants Attempted 8 Programs 2 Pedestrian Checks 4 Crime Prevention Hours 120 Bar Checks 0 Back-ups 4 Follow-ups 10 Search Warrants 3 Probation Searches 2 Parole Searches 0 Meetings 2 283 La Quinta Target Team Report Page 2 Recovered Stolen Property Citations issued Surveillance's Property Checks Civil Commitments Bicycle Time Training Hours Illegal Drugs Seized Total Mileage: 260 miles Over 100 items (Excess of $40,000) 0 10 6 0 0 16 8 grams (Methamphetamine) Noteworthy Accomplishments The Target Team served three search warrants, which yielded three arrests for 459 PC and recovered stolen property. The Target Team has continued the burglary/theft suppression program to include increased patrols and public information through the use of flyers and public contact. The Target Team with assistance of the Indio Police Department recovered over $40,000 worth of stolen property, which resulted in the arrest of three suspects. Through follow-up investigations, the La Quinta Target Team has arrested or identified 20 individuals for involvement in committing the crimes of burglary or possessing stolen property. This is a result of the ongoing burglary suppression program. Target Team members arrested three individuals for an in -progress burglary and recovered stolen property. Riverside County Sheriff's Department EXPLORER POST 503 PROGRAM REPORT February 2002 Training meetings were held on February 2, 5, 16, and 23. The training meetings covered the following topics: 1) Physical Training 2) Building Search Instruction & Practice 3) Tug -of -War Practice Explorer Captain Andres Martinez and I led the Physical Training. Deputies' Eller, Yocum and I led the Building Search Training. Station Crime Analyst Jennifer Richards coordinated the Tug -of War Training. Explorer Post 503 assisted at the National Date Festival in Indio with the following events: 1. Traffic and Parking Control: February 16, 17, 18 23, and 24. 2. Crowd Control at the entrance gates: February 16, 17, 18, and 23. 3. Sheriffs Department Recruiting Booth: February 16, 17, and 23. Explorer Post 503 assisted with a Public Safety and CPR Event in the City of Coachella on February 9, 2002. The Explorer Post members are preparing for participation in the following future events: 1. Colorado River Competition: April 10-14, 2002. 2. National Explorer Competition: July 2002. 3. R.S.O. Explorer Academy: August 2002. Submitted by Explorer Post Advisor, Senior Deputy Andy Gerrard 28 ojawiro iro. CITY OF LA QUINTA JANUARY CRIME COMPARISONS C"ME JANUARY 2002 JANUARY 2001 YTD (02) YTD (01) *HOMICIDE 0 1 0 1 *RAPE 0 2 0 2 SEX CRIMES (FEL) 1 0 1 0 SEX CRIMES (MISD) 0 1 0 1 ROBBERY 2 0 2 0 ASSAULT (FEL) 14 4 14 4 ASSAULT (MISD) 16 14 16 14 BURGLARY 64 54 64 54 *VEHICLE THEFT 12 6 12 6 *THEFT (FEL) 36 17 36 17 THEFT (MISD) 49 40 49 40 VANDALISM (MISD) 18 21 18 21 DOM. VIOLENCE 13 11 13 11 NARCOTICS 13 13 13 13 DUI 10 6 10 6 T/C NON -INJURY 46 23 46 23 T/C INJURY 1 3 1 3 T/C FATAL 0 2 0 2 TRAFFIC CITATIONS 306 330 306 330 * STATISTICS INCLUDE ATTEMPTS 2�� 10 M Cfl N Lo �t- 0 V 0 N o r I N O O 0 o O O O O o 0 (` CU LO d' M N r- i w LL w 0 m LPL J Q Q w in in LL U w N W U J 0 Q J N 4 O N i' Q Z Q Z O F- ono ♦♦I— V 0 SW G_ L1. U 2 CO � o5� � o� U 1 O 4 O 1 I I M 0 o o OoLE0 N N 0) U') O LO CD U') O M M N N T� T� w w _ 0 w 0 w J U_ w J w 0 J 0 U a w 0 U J z w 0 ro w w LCf O H Z d' O LO qT co N LO N r Q U U z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO d' N O 00 CO �" N N 0 0 N Q D z �C F-- U <t U_ LL LL. LL 0 z 0 U) G O U O O O O co N �— Q H LL z U D z z z U F- Z 0 Q H U U LL U- CITY OF LA QUINTA DISPATCH INFORMATION / JANUARY 2002 TYPE OF CALL RESPONSE TIME (MINUTES) NUMBER OF INCIDENTS EMERGENCY 0 0 ROUTINE 9.5 891 *STATS TAKEN FROM RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF DATA WAREHOUSE RESPONSE TIME REPORT njo Pam. e� ro� STATEI NT FROM "CITIZENS FOR MEASURE B" Mayor Pena, and members of the La Quinta City Council. I appear tonight on behalf of the members of Citizens for Measure B. Our committee extends our sincere appreciation to you for placing measure B on the ballot and for your unanimous support of this important measure. As we all are painfully aware, the measure failed by the narrowest of margins to reach the required 66 and 2/3rds percent of the vote. Clearly, the vast majority of the electorate has said that they want the City of La Quinta to have firefighter / paramedics respond to medical emergencies. Our only challenge is to find the best way to accomplish this goal. Citizens for Measure B believe that we should return to the ballot at an early date in recognition of the closeness of the vote. In the meantime, it would be in the best interest of the entire community to ask you to seriously consider a partial implementation of Measure B. We propose that the Council authorize the hiring of the two new positions now budgeted to staff the third fire station about to be built in north La Quinta. These new firefighters would be hired as firefighter/paramedics and used to staff a new paramedic squad. This squad would then respond to all calls within the City of La Quinta. Between now and the time these firefighter/paramedics will be needed to staff the third station, they will demonstrate to the community the true value of paramedic service - saving lives!!! The Citizens for Measure B will, with your support undertake to further educate all the residents of the City so that when the measure again appears on the ballot, there will be no question about its passage. We strongly urge you to take the steps necessary to hire the personnel now budgeted and use their skills to provide needed medical care and be fully prepared to take on their duties when the third fire station is opened. Let me assure you that our committee has carefully considered all the alternatives and bring this proposal to you as the best means to honor the wishes of the vast majority of the voters of La Quinta. We ask younact promptly on this most important matter. We stand ready to assist you in any way possible. March 19,2002 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: March 19, 2002 Public Hearing to Review the Planning Commission Approval Pursuant to Section 9.200.120.D. for an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report 97-337 (State Clearinghouse No. 97011055), Site Development Permit 2002-728, Conditional Use Permit 2002-067, and Tentative Parcel Map 30420 Applicant: Stamko Development Co. RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying an Addendum to The Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan Final EIR (1997) and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report 0 998); Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Conditional Use Permit 2002-067, subject to conditions; Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Site Development Permit 2001-728, subject to conditions; Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Parcel Map 30420, subject to conditions. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Planning Commission Review: The Planning Commission reviewed this request at its meeting of February 26, 2002. The Commission unanimously adopted Resolutions 2002-024 through 2002-027, certifying the Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan Final EIR (1997) and 29 G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\StamkoWM.wpd Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (1998), and approving the Conditional Use Permit, Site Development Permit, and Tentative Parcel Map, subject to the findings and amended conditions. Previous Project: The 87-acre Specific Plan area (the "Project") is located immediately south of State Highway 1 1 1 and immediately east of Adams Street, in the northern part of La Quinta. Dune Palms Road lies approximately 300 feet east of the eastern site boundary and Avenue 48 lies approximately 1,850 feet south of the southern site boundary. On July 15, 1997, the City Council of the City of La Quinta unanimously approved a Specific Plan to permit and control development of an auto sales/services mall and a large mixed -use retail commercial "Power Center" on the Project site. The originally approved Specific Plan allowed the development of up to 275,000 square feet of auto sales/service mall, and approximately 400,000 square feet, or .25 Floor -Area -Ratio (FAR), for retail/commercial space. Environmental Considerations: The potential environmental impacts associated with the development of the previous Project were assessed in an EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 9701 1055) which was also certified by the City Council. The certified Final EIR assessed the previous Project's potential impacts on the following environmental areas: 1. Potential Secondary Land Use Effects 2. Geotechnical Considerations 3. Hydrology/Water Quality 4. Biological Resources 5. Transportation/Circulation 6. Air Quality 7. Noise 8. Water Distribution and Storage 9. Solid Waste Disposal 10. Public Services 11. Aesthetics; and 12. Cultural Resources This Final EIR also assessed the previous Project's potential growth -inducing impacts and evaluated five alternatives to the previous Project. P� !� tJ 3 G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\StamkoWM.wpd In 1998, the Project applicant proposed an amendment to the approved Specific Plan to reflect modifications in the internal layout of the previous Project and the further refinement of the development concepts. As approved, this amendment allowed development of four different mixes of auto sales/service and retail commercial land uses, including the development of large retail stores, commonly know as "big box" stores or commercial power centers. A SEIR was prepared that analyzed each of the proposed four development scenarios in equal detail and was certified in December 1998. This SEIR analyzed the same impact topics addressed in the original EIR completed in 1997. The development scenario now proposed for implementation by the applicant's current, more specific entitlement package, was previously subject to CEQA compliance review in the previous EIRs. Project Request: The current proposed Project requests three discretionary actions. Specifically, a Site Development Permit, a Conditional Use Permit for the auto servicing uses and garden center, as well as approval of a Tentative Tract Map. The Project proposes development of 334,117 square feet on approximately 29 acres within the 39 ± acre Planning Area III. Table 1 summarizes the proposed land uses. The Project site is located on the southeastern portion of the Specific Plan area, south of Highway 111 and to the east of La Quinta Drive. Development is currently proposed on parcels 1, 5, 6 and 11. As shown, 19,200 square feet of specialty stores and associated parking stalls would be located on the northeast portion of the site on Parcel 6. The retail uses would be setback from Highway 1 1 1 by a 50 foot landscaped buffer to the north and located approximately 60 feet from the eastern property boundary, which includes a 10 foot landscaped buffer setback. Immediately south on Parcel 5, a 86,584 square foot Retail "A" Building is proposed, with parking provided to the west. The Retail "A" Building is also positioned 60 feet away from the eastern Project boundary, 10 feet of which also includes a landscaped setback. To the southwest of this parking area is parcel 1 1, which includes the 115 square foot gas station, associated with the potential occupation of Retail "B" Building by a Wal- Mart Supercenter. The gas station is on the southeast corner of the Auto Centre Drive and La Quinta Centre Drive intersection. However, access is only provided to the station from within the Project site. The gas station is approximately 50 feet from La Quinta Centre Drive, which includes a 10 foot landscaped buffer. To the south of the gas station is Parcel 1, which includes parking and the proposed 228,218 square foot Retail "B" Building. This building would include a garden center and a tire installation and express lube facility on the western side of the building. Retail "B" Building is located 60 feet from the southern boundary and 30 feet from the eastern boundary. The southern boundary also includes a 10 foot landscaped setback. 2 "0 U "J G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\StamkoWM.wpd Table 1 Land Use Summary 1 Retail B/Parking 19.44 228,218 1,124 5 Retail A/Parking 7.35 86,584 484 6 13 Specialty Stores/ 1.82 19,200 135 Parking 11 Gas Station 0.47 115 and 8 0 pumps TOTALS: 29.08' 334,117 1,743 ' 29.08 acres represents total land area of the proposed Project within the 38.35 acre Planning Area 111 Access: Access to the Project site is provided from Highway 1 1 1, La Quinta Centre Drive and Auto Centre Drive. As proposed, two access points would be provided off of Highway 1 1 1, just west of Parcel 6. This access extends south, through the Project site down to the Retail "B Building. This is the only major internal north and south drive aisle. Three access points would be provided along La Quinta Centre Drive. One would be north of Auto Centre Drive, the second would be the entrance at the intersection of La Quinta Centre Drive and Auto Center Drive, while the third is located to the south of this intersection. The northern access extends east, into the site, up to the 19,200 square feet of shops, at the eastern extent of the site. The southern access extends east into the site, along the frontage of the Retail "B" Building. As proposed, 1,743 parking stalls would be provided, of which only 1,336 are required by applicable City Ordinances. Lighting: The proposed Project is requesting 24 foot light standards in front of the "shop building" and by the gas station, with the rest of the light standards at a proposed height of 34 feet. The Zoning Code Section 9.150.080 K. 8., limits the light standards to a height that does not exceed the maximum permitted building height of the zone in which it is situated or 18 feet (measured from finish grade at the base of the standard), whichever is greater. The Zoning Code and Specific Plan identify a 40 foot height limit on Building "A" and "B." Historically, the only light standards that exceed 25 feet along Highway 1 1 1 are located in the existing One Eleven La Quinta Center. The Planning Commission granted the requested standard height of 34 feet and 24 feet. G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\StamkoWM.wpd Landscaping: The Architecture and Landscape Review Committee reviewed the building and landscaping plans for this Project on February 13, 2002. The Committee recommended approval of the building elevations. The Committee, however, did suggest that the gas station design should contain the same architectural elements as shown on the front of the other buildings. Further, the Committee recommended that the Project be conditioned to; (1) include an enhanced landscape entry statement at the intersection of Auto Centre Drive and the access lane east of La Quinta Centre Drive; and (2) that final landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of any grading permit. The Planning Commission conditioned the final landscape plans to be reviewed by the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee and the Planning Commission. Blight: A condition of approval has been added to the Site Development and Conditional Use permits that will assure that if the existing Walmart vacates their current building and relocates into Building "B", that the existing building will be re -occupied. Signs: The Planning Commission conditioned the development to re -submit the sign program for future consideration as a business item. Public Notice: This request was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on March 8, 2002, and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet around the Project boundaries. Public Agency Review: All applicable agency comments received have been made part of the Conditions of Approval for these cases. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying an Addendum to The Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan Final EIR (1997) and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (1998); Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Conditional Use Permit 2002- 067, subject to conditions; Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Site Development Permit 2002- 728, subject to conditions; 2v G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\StamkoWM.wpd Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Parcel Map 30420, subject to conditions; 2. Do not adopt Resolutions of the City Council certifying an Addendum to The Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan Final EIR 0 997) and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (1998); approving Conditional Use Permit 2002-067; approving Site Development Permit 2002-728; and approving Tentative Parcel Map 30420; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully supmitted, �—Her+an munity Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Site Development Permit text (for City Council only) 3. Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit (for City Council only) 4. Planning Commission minutes of February 26, 2002 u (I G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\StamkoWM.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING AN ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE CENTRE AT LA QUINTA SPECIFIC PLAN #97-029 (1997) AND SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (1998), STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 97011055 PREPARED FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2002-067, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 CASE: ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT APPLICANT: STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 26th day of February, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of Stamko Development Co. on the Addendum, the Site Development Permit, the Conditional Use Permit, and did approve the applications by adopting Planning Commission Resolutions 2002-024 through 2002-027; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 19th day of March, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of Stamko Development Co. on an Addendum to a previously certified Environmental Impact Report and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ("Addendum") for approval of a Site Development Permit for a retail shopping center having 334,117 ± square feet, a Conditional Use Permit for a plant nursery/garden center, an auto repair/specialty shop, and an auto service station in conjunction with retail Building "B", and a Tentative Parcel Map to create 18 numbered and two letter lots ranging in size from .47 to 19.44 acres for the 87-acre Specific Plan area located immediately south of State Highway 1 1 1, east of Adams Street, approximately 300 feet west of Dune Palms Road and approximately 1,850 feet north of Avenue 48 and more particularly described as follows: APNS 649-030-057 thru 063; WHEREAS, said Addendum complies with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council); and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering the EIR, the Supplemental EIR, the Addendum, and all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and 3 reasons to justify certifying said Addendum: 0 l G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoEA.wpd Resolution 2002- Addendum to Environmental Impact Report Stamko Development Co. Adopted: March 19, 2002 1. The current applications for a Site Development Permit, Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map Permit (the "Application" or "Proposed Project"), with respect to a portion of The Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan, constitute further discretionary approvals needed to implement the previously approved Project ("Prior Project"). The application reflects necessary entitlements to proceed with development of approximately 334,117 square feet of retail commercial space, on approximately 29 acres within Planning Area III of The Centre at La Quinta. 2. On July 15, 1997, the City Council of the City of La Quinta (the "City") certified the adequacy and completeness of a Final Environmental Impact Report [SCN 9701 10551 (the "Final EIR") and adopted Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, in connection with its approval of the Prior Project. In December 1998, the City certified a Supplemental EIR in connection with its consideration and approval of an Amendment to the Specific Plan to reflect modifications in the internal layout of the Prior Project and further refinements of the development concepts. The Proposed Project is consistent with the amended Specific Plan analyzed in the 1998 Supplemental EIR. 3. The Proposed Project does not constitute a substantial change to the previously approved Prior Project, which will require major revisions to the Final EIR as augmented by the 1998 Supplemental EIR (collectively "Prior EIR"), due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects. In fact, the Proposed Project reflects a reduction in intensity of development within Planning Area III, in that the Proposed Project develops only 334,117 square feet of retail commercial space, substantially less than the maximum square footage previously approved for the Prior Project (i.e., 400,000 square feet or .25 FAR). 4. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Proposed Project will be undertaken, which will require major modifications or revisions to the Prior EIR, due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. 5. No new information of substantial importance which was not known, and could not have been known, with the exercise of reasonable diligence, at the time the Final EIR and Supplemental EIR were adopted, has become available which shows any of the bases described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3), for requiring a Subsequent EIR or Supplemental EIR. U ,0 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoEA.wpd Resolution 2002- Addendum to Environmental Impact Report Stamko Development Co. Adopted: March 19, 2002 6. Based upon these findings and the Addendum/Initial Study, the City has determined that no Subsequent EIR or Supplemental EIR is required or appropriate under Public Resources Code § 21166, and that an Addendum is sufficient to make the Prior EIR apply to the Proposed Project. 7. The Addendum/Initial Study, which was prepared to. evaluate whether the Proposed Project could cause any new or potentially more severe significant adverse effects on the environment, specifically analyzed potential secondary land use impacts based upon an updated Market Impact Analysis prepared by the Natelson Company. Based upon the facts and analysis contained in the Addendum/Initial Study, the City finds that the Proposed Project will not have any new or more severe adverse secondary land use impacts, in the defined Study Area, including no significant adverse blight -related impacts due to Walmart relocating from its existing site in La Quinta to the Retail "B" Building in Planning Area III of The Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan. This finding is based upon the Natelson Company's updated analysis and the conditions imposed by the City, with respect to the continued maintenance of and future occupancy of the existing Walmart store in the City of La Quinta. 8. The Addendum/Initial Study also specifically analyzed the Proposed Project's potential effects on traffic and circulation, both with respect to the public roads in the vicinity of the Project and the internal circulation of the Project site, based upon an updated traffic analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads. Based upon the facts and analysis contained in the Addendum/Initial Study, the City finds that the Proposed Project will not have any new or more severe significant traffic or circulation impacts, either on public roads or the internal circulation system at the Project site. 9. The Addendum/Initial Study also specifically analyzed the Proposed Project's potentially new or more severe significant noise related impacts. Based upon the facts and analysis contained in the Addendum/Initial Study, the City finds that the Proposed Project will not have any new or more severe significant adverse noise -related effects. In addition, noise monitoring conducted after the Retail "B" Building is fully operational must demonstrate compliance with the City's Noise Ordinance at the property line. 10. The prior EIR estimated that the Project would consume roughly 522 feet of water per year. The Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) indicated that this demand would not exceed their current or projected water supplies. No G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoEA.wpd r' Resolution 2002- Addendum to Environmental Impact Report Stamko Development Co. Adopted: March 19, 2002 substantial water system improvements were needed to serve the Prior Project and no wasteful water use or practices were anticipated. The Proposed Project would develop 334,117 square feet of commercial retail uses, in Planning Area III, which is less than the previously approved square footage of 400,000 square feet, or 429,000 square feet, under the .25 FAR specified in the Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan. Since there is a direct relationship between the size and scale of a development and its overall water demand, the reduction in total building area under the Proposed Project would result in an overall decrease in the amount of water required for the project site. Therefore, as the total amount of water required for the Proposed Project is less than that necessary for the Prior Project, no new or more severe impacts with respect to water demand would occur. 11. The Proposed Project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 12. The Proposed Project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no new or more severe significant adverse effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Addendum/Initial Study. 13. The Proposed Project will not result in impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable when viewed in connection with planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. 14. The Proposed Project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, in that no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health or public services. 15. These factual findings are based upon the previously certified Final EIR and Supplemental EIR, the Addendum/Initial Study, the submissions of the applicant, the updated Market Impact Analysis report prepared by the Natelson Company, the updated traffic report prepared by Urban Crossroads, the noise impact analysis conducted by Impact Sciences, and the records and files of the City's Community Development Department related to the Project. , G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoEA.wpd Resolution 2002- Addendum to Environmental Impact Report Stamko Development Co. Adopted: March 19, 2002 16. The City Council has considered the Addendum to Environmental Impact Report and the Addendum reflects the independent judgement of the City. 17. The City has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 18. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitutes the findings of the City Council for this Addendum. 2. That it does hereby certify the Addendum for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Addendum text on file in the Community Development Department and attached hereto. 3. That the Addendum reflects the independent judgement of the City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 19th day of March, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoEA.wpd Resolution 2002- Addendum to Environmental Impact Report Stamko Development Co. Adopted: March 19, 2002 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC/AAE City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoEA.wpd DRAFT Addendum to The Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan Final EIR (1997) and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (1998) State Clearinghouse No. 97011055 ARRroy2d bir. DAts Selo PlanningConunlssion City Ci Concil � ..._._... O Community Dev. Dept Initials Case No. (fA 9 7 - 33 O With Conditions Prepared for: City of La Quinta Community Development Department 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Prepared by: Impact Sciences, Inc. 30343 Canwood Street, Suite 210 Agoura Hills, California 91301 February 2002 013 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document is an Addendum with an incorporated Initial Study (Addendum/ Initial Study) to the Final EIR and Supplemental EIR ("Previous EIRs") for The Centre at La Quinta (Specific Plan) (State Clearinghouse no. 97011055). The Final EIR assessed the potential impacts associated with development of the Specific Plan, while the Supplemental EIR (SEIR) evaluated an amendment to the Specific Plan. Specifically, the SEIR analyzed four potential development scenarios, including the development of two large big box commercial centers for the undeveloped portion of the Specific Plan site ("the Previous Projects"). The SEIR was certified in September 1998. Purpose of an Addendum When a Final EIR has been certified for a project, CEQA provides for the update of the information in the certified EIR to address changes to a project or changes to the circumstances under which a project will occur. Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines provides that where the Lead Agency determines that neither project changes, changed circumstances, nor new information requires the preparation and circulation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR, the Lead Agency may prepare an Addendum to an EIR. An Addendum to a previously certified EIR may be prepared if changes or additions to the EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions requiring a Supplemental or Subsequent EIR have occurred. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 states that the purpose of an Addendum is to provide a way of making minor changes or additions to an EIR. Circulation of an Addendum for public review is not required. This Addendum to the Previous EIRs has been prepared because: (1) no substantial changes are proposed in the Previous Project which will require major revisions of the Previous EIRs due to the involvement of new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts; (2) no substantial changes in circumstances under which the Previous Project is undertaken will occur which will require major revisions of the Previous EIRs due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; and (3) no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Previous EIRs were certified as complete, shows any of the following: (A) the Previous Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the Previous EIRs; (B) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the Previous EIRs; (C) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would ira 1 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La uint February 20 � 14 fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Previous Project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative(s); or, (D) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the Previous EIRs would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. These determinations are supported by the Initial Study incorporated into this Addendum, in Section 2.0, and additional updated studies/ reports appended to this Addendum in the appendices. Regional and Local Setting The City of La Quinta encompasses approximately 31 square miles of land area located in the southwestern portion of the Coachella Valley, in eastern Riverside County. The Coachella Valley is located between the San Bernardino Mountains and the Santa Rosa Mountains (see Figure 1). La Quinta is located approximately 18 miles southeast of the resort community of Palm Springs. It is surrounded by the Cities of Indian Wells and Palm Desert to the northwest, Indio, Coachella, the Augustine Indian Reservation and Thermal to the east, and the Santa Rosa Mountains to the south and west. The Interstate 10 Freeway (I-10) provides regional east -west access to the Coachella Valley communities. Washington Street provides vehicular access from I-10 south to State Highway 111, which leads to the Project site. The 87-acre Specific Plan area is located immediately south of State Highway 111 and immediately east of Adams Street, in the northern part of La Quinta (see Figure 2). Dune Palms Road lies approximately 300 feet east of the eastern site boundary and Avenue 48 lies approximately 1,850 feet south of the southern site boundary. Description of Previous Environmental Review On July 15,1997, the City Council of the City of La Quinta unanimously adopted a Specific Plan to permit and control development of an auto/sales services mall and a large mixed -use retail commercial 'power center' on the Project site. A specific plan is a planning tool authorized by state law that allows a local government to recognize the unique characteristics of a particular planning area and to establish customized land use regulations that will achieve the objectives of the General Plan for that area. The City Council approved the Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan, which addresses the requirements of state law, including a statement of the relationship of the Specific Plan to the General Plan. The Specific Plan established specific performance, design and development standards to guide the 2 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2L J Bernardino National S 5 mi. 2.5 mi. 0 mi. 5 mi. Son Bernardino Riverside County Joshua Tree Natio al Monument NEESE 0 fl-- I\, FIGUREI Regional Local Country Club Dr. Bermuda Dun7s-1 Airport Bermuda Dunes Country Club . _. WaringIndian N ME Springs Country Club \�" tv 2 ME N"ITOMMI, PROJECT SITE a 50th Ave. +M ��+i i W :.. KK > �'�,g� �'^ �i?a � }�a�'-z'a ✓n .Ngl a Ave.: W4✓,co'4,.' ^�`''�� ST P.,� ��,,tt � t`S S� a F �, i" �' wi FyYa' 4` l t� oaaL4i� a, k`r, .r �F y 1 K ',�y,��#'x.y `ONE 7a z Elm °x�a ��.� : �i�' ..z'� f3� A, ,">:S•" ( :yam f�. y. A�yrka„� '�F '� Z z. Y 3� 00a: hk dG� S a'yYo.,�i'A' 9Y �+F.`kSJa ; 7 5i 3 6000' 3000' 0' 6000' 01 31 FIGUREZ Project Site Vicinity development of the subject property in a manner that is intended to implement the City's General Plan, and also provided flexibility to respond to phased development and changing conditions. The Specific Plan also augmented the City's Zoning Ordinance by providing design guidelines, a tailored list of allowable, conditionally allowable and prohibited uses for the site, and, in some cases, unique development standards. The originally approved Specific Plan allowed the development of up to 275,000 square feet of auto sales/service facilities, and approximately 400,000 square feet or .25 Floor -Area -Ratio (FAR) of retail/commercial space. The potential environmental impacts associated with the development of the Previous Project were assessed in an EIR (State Clearinghouse no. 97011055) which was also certified by the City Council. The specific actions approved by the City Council on July 15,1997 were as follows: • Resolution 97-62: Certification of Environmental Impact Report • Resolution 97-63: Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 28525 • Resolution 97-64: Adoption of Specific Plan 97-029 • Resolution 97-65: Approval of Site Development Permit 97-603 • Resolution 97-66: Approval of Conditional Use Permit • Ordinance No. 306: Approval of Development Agreement The certified Final EIR, assessed the Previous Project's potential impacts on the following environmental areas: • Potential Secondary Land Use Effects; • Geotechnical Considerations; • Hydrology/ Water Quality; • Biological Resources; • Transportation/Circulation • Air Quality; • Noise; • Water Distribution and Storage; • Solid Waste Disposal; • Public Services; • Aesthetics; and • Cultural Resources. 1 5 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2002 This Final EIR also assessed the Previous Project's potential growth inducing impacts and evaluated five alternatives to the Previous Project. In 1998, the project applicant proposed an amendment to the approved Specific Plan to reflect modifications in the internal layout of the Previous Project and the further refinement of the development concepts. As approved, this amendment allowed development of four different mixes of auto sales/service and retail commercial land uses, including the development of large retail stores, commonly know as "big box" stores or commercial power centers. A SEIR was prepared that analyzed each of the proposed four development scenarios in equal detail and was certified in December 1998. This SEIR analyzed the same impact topics addressed in the original EIR completed in 1997. The development scenario now proposed for implementation by the applicant's current, more specific entitlement package, was previously subject to CEQA compliance review in the Previous EIRs. Description of Proposed Project The current proposed Project requests three discretionary actions. Specifically, a Site Development Permit, a Conditional Use permit for the auto serving uses and garden center as well as approval of a Tentative Tract Map (the Project). The Project site is located within Planning Area III, as defined in the Specific Plan, and maintains the general layout and configuration analyzed in the Previous EIRs. The Specific flan allows the development of retail commercial uses in Planning Area III, under all four scenarios, of up to 400,000 square feet or a FAR of .25. A .25 FAR applied to the Project site, which is approximately 39 acres, results in a developable square footage of 429,000 square feet ("the Previously Approved Square Footage"). Prospective tenants for the proposed commercial center include Wal-Mart and Kohl's. For purposes of this analysis, the operational characteristics of these tenants (Wal-Mart and Kohl's) have been assumed. The Project proposes development of 334,117 square feet on approximately 29 acres within the 39± acre Planning Area III. This proposed development is substantially below the Previously Approved Square Footage analyzed in the Previous EIRs. Table 1 summarizes the proposed land uses, while Figure 3 presents the proposed Site Plan. The Project site is located on the southeastern portion of the Specific Plan area, south of Highway 111 and to the east of La Quinta Drive. Development is currently proposed on parcels 1, 5, 6 and 11. As shown,19,200 square feet of specialty stores and associated parking stalls would be located on the northeast portion of the site on parcel 6. The retail uses would be setback from i Highway 111 by a 50 foot landscaped buffer to the north and located approximately 60 013 6 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2002 rl010 31 feet from the eastern property boundary, which includes a 10 foot landscaped buffer setback. Immediately south on parcel 5, a 86,584 square foot Retail A Building is proposed, with parking provided to the west. The Retail A Building is also positioned 60 feet away from the eastern Project boundary, 10 feet of which also includes a landscaped setback. To the southwest of this parking area is parcel 11, which includes the 115 square foot gas station, associated with the potential occupation of Retail B Building by a Wal-Mart Supercenter. The gas station is on the southeast corner of the Auto Centre Drive and La Quinta Drive intersection. However, access is only provided to the station from within the Project site. The gas station is approximately 50 feet from La Quinta Drive, which includes a 10 foot landscaped buffer. To the south of the gas station is parcel 1, which includes parking and the proposed 228,218 square foot Retail B Building. This building would include a garden center and a tire installation and express lube facility on the western side of the building. Retail B Building is located 60 feet from the southern boundary and 30 feet from the eastern boundary. The southern boundary also includes a 10 foot landscaped setback. Access to the Project site is provided from Highway 111, La Quinta Drive and Auto Centre Drive. As proposed, two access points would be provided off of Highway 111, just west of parcel 6. This access extends south, through the Project site down to the Retail B Building. This is the only major internal north and south drive aisle. Three access points would be provided along La Quinta Drive. One would be north of Auto Centre Drive, the second would be the entrance at the intersection of La Quinta Drive and Auto Center Drive, while the third is located to the south of this intersection. The northern access extends east, into the site, up to the 19,200 square feet of shops. at the eastern extent of the site, while the southern access extends east into the site, along the frontage of the Retail B Building. As proposed, 1,743 parking stalls would be provided, of which only 1,336 is required by applicable City Ordinances. Table 1 Land Use Summary Parcel Proposed Use Acrea e S uare-Feet Parkin Provided 1 Retail B/Parking 19.44 228,218 1,124 5 Retail A/Parking 7.35 86,584 484 6 13 Specialty Stores/ Parking 1.82 19,200 135 11 Gas Station 0.47 115 and 8 pumps 0 TOTALS: 29.081 334,117 1,743 129.08 acres represents total land area of the proposed Project within the 38.35 acre Planning Area III 001. 40 8 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2002 Findings of this Addendum/Initial Study This Addendum relies on an Initial Study Checklist Form, as suggested in State CEQA Guideline Section 15963, assessing a wide variesty of potential environmental impacts. Section 2.0 of this document contains the Initial Study and explains the basis for each response to the questions on the environmental form, and that analysis is expressly incorporated into this Addendum. The City also requested that additional updated information be collected for this addendum with respect to three potential issues: Secondary Land Use Impacts, such as blight, Transportation and Circulation, and Noise. Impact Sciences, Inc. retained the Natelson Company to review and update its prior Market Impact Analysis that was prepared for the Previous EIRs, in light of this specific Project and, in particular, the potential relocation of the existing Wal-Mart store in La Quinta to the proposed Retail B Building at the Centre at La Quinta. A copy of this study is included as Appendix A. In summary, five key topics associated with the economic impact of the Project were addressed including (1) whether there is sufficient consumer demand to support the grocery component of a Wal-Mart Supercenter in La Quinta; (2) whether there is sufficient consumer demand to support the Kohl's store; (3) whether there is sufficient consumer demand to support 40,000 square feet of additional general merchandising in a larger Wal-Mart Supercenter; (4) whether there is sufficient consumer demand to support the 19,200 square feet of commercial uses on Parcel 6; and (5) whether there is sufficient consumer demand to support the re -use of the existing Wal-Mart store located in the City of La Quinta. Based on the analysis prepared by the Natelson Company, no significant impacts would result from the development of 334,117 square feet of new retail stores and/or relocation of commercial tenants, such as Wal-Mart. As a result, no new or more severe secondary land use impacts were determined to occur. An updated traffic analysis, which was prepared by Urban Crossroads, and is presented in Appendix B, was based on the proposed Site Plan with specific square footages, land use (including the proposed Wal- Mart gas station) and parking lot configurations. As stated in the updated traffic analysis, the proposed Project would not generate a volume of traffic that would significantly impact any of the studied roadway segments or intersections. Furthermore, the updated traffic analysis examined the internal circulation network of the Project site to determine if any of the proposed uses could cause internal circulation conflicts. It was concluded, based on this analysis, that the Project would not result in any new or more severe traffic conditions either on public roads or internal to the Project site. 3 3 0221 9 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2002 Noise impacts associated with the buildout of Planning Area III have been previously analyzed, based on full buildout as originally envisioned in the 1998 Specific Plan amendment. An updated noise analysis was prepared as specific land uses and operational characteristics of the Project are more defined at this time. Vacant land, zoned as regional commercial, exists to the east and south of the Project site. The regional commercial zone allows up to 16 dwelling units per acre on this property. Therefore, there is a potential for future residential uses to be located adjacent to a portion of the proposed commercial uses. In order to make reasonable assumptions regarding a future exterior noise environment, operational characteristics from Wal-Mart Supercenters, including truck delivery rates were utilized. Noise monitoring of delivery truck activity was conducted at a supermarket in November 1999 by Impact Sciences. Based on these noise levels and environmental factors, and comparing them to La Quinta's noise standards, the resulting noise level attributable to Project operations is less than the accepted threshold for determining the significance of impacts. Accordingly, no new or more severe impacts are expected as a result of noise generated from the project. U23 10 Draft Addendum to the Centre at !a Quinta February 2002 2.0 INITIAL STUDY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CITY OF LA QUINTA INITIAL STUDY 1. INTRODUCTION The Initial Study has been prepared in accordance with relevant provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 as amended and the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines). Section 15063(c) of the CEQA Guidelines indicates that the purposes of an Initial Study are to: 1. Provide the lead agency, in this case the City of La Quinta, with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) or negative declaration; 2. Enable an applicant or lead agency to modify a project, mitigating adverse impacts before an EIR is prepared, thereby enabling the project to qualify for a negative declaration; 3. Assist the preparation of a EIR, if one is required, by: a. Focusing the EIR on the effects determined to be significant, b. Identifying the effects determined not to be significant, c. Explaining the reasons why potentially significant effects would not be significant, and d. Identifying whether a program EIR, tiering, or another appropriate process can be used for analysis of a project's environmental effects. 4. Facilitate environmental assessment early in the design of a project; 5. Provide documentation of the factual basis for the finding in a Negative Declaration that a project will not have a significant effect on the environment; 6. Eliminate unnecessary EIRs; 7. Determine whether a previously prepared EIR could be used with the project. According to Section 15063(b)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, if the lead agency determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project, either individually or cumulatively, may cause a significant effect on the environment, regardless of whether the overall effect of the project is adverse or beneficial, the lead agency shall do one of the following: 1. Prepare an EIR, 2. Use a previously prepared EIR which the lead agency determines would adequately analyze the project at hand, or 3. Determine, pursuant to a program EIR, tiering, or another appropriate process, which of a project's effects were adequately examined by an earlier EIR or negative declaration. The lead agency shall then ascertain whiclrj effects, if any, should be analyzed in a later EIR or negative declaration. 11 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Qui'nta2 February 2002 2. PROJECT INFORMATION Case No(s),/Project Title: General Plan Designation: Existing Zoning: RL and RM County Assessor's Information: The Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan Regional Commercial Map Book No. Page List of other agencies whose approval is required: None (e.g., permits, financial approval, participating agreement) Parcel Site Description: (Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, historical or scenic aspects.) La Quinta is located within the Coachella Valley portion of central Riverside County, in southern California. This area forms the northwest extension of the Colorado Desert in southeastern California. It is characterized by arid, sparsely vegetated desert land. The valley floor is composed generally of sandy soils that were deposited through the effects of water and wind erosion. Westerly winds are persistent, and contribute to extensive erosion and the formation of blowsand activity and sand dunes. Vehicular access to the Coachella Valley is provided by the Interstate 10 Freeway, providing an east -west linkage to the Los Angeles metropolitan area to the west, and the desert areas to the east. The City of La Quinta encompasses approximately 31 square miles of both mountainous and desert terrain land area in the southwestern portion of the Coachella Valley. La Quinta is a community of which nearly 13 square miles consist of protected mountain open space, parkland or golf course open space designations. Roughly 70 percent of the land within the city is undeveloped, and much of this consists of steep, rocky slopes of the Santa Rosa Mountains. The Project site consists of approximately 29 acres of vacant land within the 38t acre Planning Area III of the Centre Specific Plan. The elevation of the site is approximately 285 feet above sea level (asl). Surrounding Properties: (Describe the surrounding properties and the effect the proposed Project will have on the area.) The irregular -shaped Project site is generally bordered by State Highway 111 to the north, Dune Palms Road on the east, and Adams Street to the west. Uses immediately surrounding the site include open space to the north, east, south and west with the auto center component of the specific plan to the northwest. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Stamko Development Co. 78-W Calle Estado, Suite 5 La Quinta, CA 92253 Project Description: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and an secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation.) y The applicant is requesting approval for a 29t acre regional commercial development within the Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan Area. Specifically, the Specific Plan allows the development of retail commercial uses in Planning Area III under all four scenarios, of up to 400,000 square feet or a Floor -Area -Ratio (FAR) of .25. A FAR of .25 applied to 13 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quin tpl n February 200V 40 the Project site, which is approximately 39 acres, results in a developable square footage of 429,000 square feet ("the Previously Approved Square Footage"). As proposed, the applicant would develop only 334,117 square feet of regional commercial uses, which is substantially below the development intensity originally evaluated in the Previous EIRs. Planned uses include 19,200 square feet of specialty stores, two stand alone retail buildings totaling 314,802 square feet, and a 115 square foot gas station with 8 gas pumps. 1 027 14 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quints February 2002 3. DETERMINATION Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the analysis on the following pages. F-1 Land Use and Planning Transportation/Circulation Public Services 1-1 Population and Housing ❑ Biological Resources � Utilities and Service Systems F1Geophysical ❑ Energy and Mineral Resources Aesthetics F-1 Water ❑ Hazards a Cultural Resources F] Air Quality Noise Recreation Mandatory Findings of Significance Environmental Determination. The basis of this initial evaluation: The proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. F-1 Although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described have been added to the project. El A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT a REPORT is required. The proposed Project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on the following pages, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed Project. COMMENTS: 3 -) 023 15 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2002 To be considered by the La Quinta Planning Commission on February 26, 2002 3i? 029 16 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2002 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanation of Evaluations: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole of the action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: I. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: Significant Unless Significant Impact Mitigated Impact No Impact a. Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? a 17 El b. Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ❑ policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over V\1J the project? c. Be incompatible with existing land use in the ❑ 1:1 El IV771 vicinity? c. Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., a El impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? d. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an El ❑ F-1 established community (including a low income or minority community)? Documentation: As stated in the Previous EIRs, retail demand analysis indicated that there was sufficient retail demand to support the redevelopment of commercial retail buildings for other retail commercial uses should any retailers relocate to the new commercial development in the Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan Area. Land Use impacts on the surrounding areas were not determined to be significant for any of the four development scenarios, including full buildout of retail commercial uses in Planning Area III up to 400,000 square feet of .25 FAR. The Project was also expected to add to the growth of commercial development along the Highway 111 corridor, and further increase competition among auto dealers and other retail uses within the Coachella Valley. The proposed 334,117 square feet of development is less than the intensity of development previously approved by the Specific Plan and analyzed in the 1998 SEIR. As a result, the total amount of retail that could be drawn from other locations would be reduced from the level assumed in the 1998 SEIR. In order to assess the potential impact associated with secondary land use issues, for this proposed Project, an updated market impact analysis was prepared for the Project by the Natelson Company, Inc. which is included in Appendix 1� , A. five key topics associated with the economic impact of the Project were addressed including (1) whether �`� , 17 Draft Addendum to the Centre at [a Quinta 6 31) February 2002 there is sufficient consumer demand to support the grocery component of a Wal-Mart Supercenter in La Quinta; (2) whether there is sufficient consumer demand to support the Kohl's store; (3) whether there is sufficient consumer demand to support 40,000 square feet of additional general merchandising in a larger Wal-Mart Supercenter; (4) whether there is sufficient consumer demand to support the 19,200 square feet of commercial uses on Parcel 6; and (5) whether there is sufficient consumer demand to support the re -use of the existing Wal-Mart store located in the City of La Quinta. Based on the analysis prepared by the Natelson Company, no significant impacts would result from the development of 334,117 square feet of new retail stores and/or relocation of commercial tenants. As a result, there are no new or more severe secondary land use impacts as a result of the proposed Project. Further Study Re uired: No further analysis is required regarding this topic. II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the Potentially Potentially Significant Less than proposal: Significant Unless Significant Impact Mitigated Impact No Impact a. Cumulatively exceed official or local population F-1 EJ F-1 projections? b. Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through ❑ (� L—J ❑ projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable ❑ ❑ ❑ housing? Documentation: As concluded in the 1998 SEIR, Population and Housing impacts were determined not to be significant. The proposed Project would develop approximately 334,100 square feet of commercial uses in Planning Area III. No homes would be built or demolished as a result of the proposed Project. Therefore the Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts to population and housing. Further Study Required: No further analysis is required regarding this topic. III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Unless Less than Significant a. Fault rupture? Impact ❑ Mitigated El Impact ❑ No Impact b. Seismic ground shaking? ❑ F-1 F-1 V\J c. Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ ❑ F-1 d. Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? ❑ El F-1 e. Landslides or mudflows? 1:1 1:1 El f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill? El F-1 ❑ ® 3 18 Draft Addendum to the Centre at la Quinta February 2002 g. Subsidence of the land? h. Expansive soils? i. Unique geologic or physical features? Documentation: VN Project development was expected to expose persons and structures to severe ground shaking during an earthquake along the San Andreas fault, and possibly during earthquakes along other regional faults. No threat of ground rupture was expected in the plan area; although, a trace of an inferred fault was identified on the western property boundary. Additional study was suggested to determine whether it presents any special constraints or design considerations for development of the western portion of the Specific Plan Area. Preliminary studies indicated that the potential for liquefaction .was very low as expansive soils are not present and ground lurching was not expected. Settlement potential was significant and required special consideration for grading and foundation design. Wind erosion potential was also very high and construction and post -construction control measures were implemented. As previously concluded in the prior EIRs, the site is considered geotechnically suitable for the proposed development. Additionally, the Previous EIRs determined that the Specific Plan development would not contribute to cumulative impacts involving geological hazards or features on any other site. 032 19 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2002 The proposed Project maintains a similar configuration and orientation of land uses that was analyzed in the 1998 SEIR. Additionally, the total square footage of the Project would be substantially less than the Previously Approved Square Footage approved by the 1998 Specific Plan Amendment, resulting in an overall decrease in land use intensity. All grading, site preparation and construction plans would be developed according to current building standards and subject to approval by the City. Furthermore, as the Project location is situated on the eastern portion of the Specific Plan Area, issues associated with the inferred fault are not relevant as the Project site is on the opposite or eastern side of the plan area. As a result, the proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe geotechnical impacts. Further Study Required: No further analysis is required regarding this topic. IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Unless Less than Significant a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and Impact ❑ Mitigated ❑ Impact ❑ No Impact amount of surface runoff? VNJ b. Exposure of people or property to water -related hazards such as flooding? ❑ ❑ ❑ L[721 c. Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved ❑ a a V\J oxygen, or turbidity)? d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? ❑ ❑ a e. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? ❑ ❑ ❑ LEE] f. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through ❑ ❑ ❑ interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? g. Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ❑ a ❑ h. Impacts to groundwater quality? ❑ i. Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? El ❑ ❑ Documentation: The prior EIRs determined that uncontrolled grading and site preparation activities could result in erosion and runoff of loose soils and other contaminants that could adversely affect downstream water quality. The developed site was expected to substantially increase impervious surface coverage that would, in turn, increase the amount and rate of runoff and which would change the composition of existing runoff to include more urban pollutants. The Project drainage system is planned to retain all runoff on site (up to 100-year storm) and would filter runoff in retention areas. As a result, the analysis in the prior EIRs did not identify any significant flood hazards or any significant Project or cumulative water quality impacts. ti 033 20 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2002 V. All storm drainage improvements would be developed to City of La Quinta standards. It should be noted that, as with any urban Project, runoff entering the storm drainage system would contain minor amounts of pollutants (including pesticides, fertilizers and motor oil). This would incrementally contribute to the degradation of surface and sub -surface water quality. Additionally, grading activities would temporarily expose soils to water erosion that would contribute to downstream sedimentation. However, through the incorporation of standard conditions of approval, construction activities would minimize the extent of erosion and runoff from the exposed soils. As the site is currently unpaved and exposed, development of the proposed Project would lessen the existing site contribution to sediment runoff at Project completion. Finally, the Project maintains a similar configuration and orientation of land uses as was analyzed in the Previous EIRs. As the Project only proposes 334,117 square feet within Planning Area III, overall land use intensity would be substantially less than that which was originally approved and analyzed in the 1998 SEIR. With the approval of the storm drainage facilities by the City Engineer, incorporating standard conditions of approval into the Project's design, as well as complying with all applicable storm water discharge permits, no new or more severe impacts would occur. Further StudyRgguired: No further analysis is required regarding this topic. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Unless Less than Significant Impact Mitigated Impact No Impact a. Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or El F� Q 0 projected air quality violation? b. Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? M F1 F-1 "71 c. Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? a F] d. Create objectionable odors? a a Documentation: Construction period emissions would exceed SCAQMD thresholds as would long-term traffic emissions. These impacts were previously identified as significant in the Previous EIRs. However, no significant localized pollutant concentrations were identified in the former environmental analysis. It should also be noted that the Project was not in violation of the AQMP and therefore, Project development would not interfere with attainment of the air quality standards within the AQMP. In summary, implementation of SCAQMD-recommended mitigation measures, construction -related and operation -related emissions would be considered unavoidably significant, while .cumulative impacts would be avoided. The proposed Project would only develop 334,117 square feet of commercial retail uses in Planning Area III, which is substantially less than the Previously Approved Square Footage as analyzed in the 1998 SEIR. It should be noted that air quality emissions resulting from a development Project is directly related to its intensity and scale, assuming similar uses. As the proposed Project would develop less than what was originally approved, air quality emissions, both construction and operational, would be less than originally calculated. As a result, the proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts with regards to air quality emissions. Further Study Required: No further analysis is required regarding this topic. 21 Dorf Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2002 VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a. Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b. Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c. Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? d. Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site? e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? f. Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g. Rail, waterborne, or air traffic impacts? Documentation: Potentially Potentially Significant Significant Unless Less than Significant Impact Mitigated Impact No Impact ❑ El ❑ ❑ F-1 ❑ The traffic analysis for the Specific Plan projected, at buildout, that between 19,900 and 20,250 average net daily vehicle trips would be generated. Significant congestion impacts were projected at two intersections in the year 2000, and at four intersections in the year 2005. Traffic signals were warranted at the main Project entrances at Highway 111 and Adams Street. The proposed Project would construct street, sidewalk and landscaping improvements along Highway 111 and Adams Street frontages in accordance with City's Circulation Element standards. Significant cumulative congestion impacts were projected at the same two intersections in year 2000, and the same four intersections in the year 2005. However, implementation of the proposed mitigation measures would reduce Project and cumulative impacts to a less than significant level. The proposed Project would develop 334,117 square feet of retail stores, substantially less than previously analyzed and approved in the 1998 Specific Plan Amendment and SEIR. This less intensive development would result in a direct reduction in vehicular trips when compared to higher square footages. An updated traffic analysis was prepared for the proposed Project based on the proposed Site Plan with specific square footages, land use (including a proposed Wal-Mart gas station) and parking lot configurations. As stated in the updated traffic analysis, the proposed Project would not generate a volume of traffic that would significantly impact any of the studied roadway segments or intersections. Furthermore, the updated traffic analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads and presented in Appendix B, examined the internal circulation network of the Project site to determine if any of the proposed uses could cause internal circulation conflicts. The Project, as proposed, would not result in any new or more severe traffic conditions either on public roads or internal to the Project site and consequently, would not result in any new or more severe impacts. Further Study Required: No further analysis is required regarding this topic. VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in imparts to: a. Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant Impact Mitigated Impact No Impact ❑ El �p R ® ► 0 22 Draft Addendum to the Centre at la Quinta February 2002 insects, animals, and birds)? b. Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)? ❑ R `�' V\1J c. Locally -designated natural communities (e.g., oak El El forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d. Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal ❑ pool)? e. Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? Documentation: Grading would remove all existing vegetation and would displace much of the on -site wildlife. This would result in loss of potential habitat for one threatened species (Coachella Valley fringe -toed lizard), which was identified as a significant impact. Buildout of the site would attract urban -adapted wildlife that would compete with native species in nearby open areas which was identified as an adverse but not significant impact. The loss of potential habitat for the Coachella Valley fringe -toed lizard would contribute to a net cumulative loss of habitat for this threatened species. However, with the previously approved mitigation, impacts were reduced to a level that is less than significant. The Specific Plan was approved in 1997 and amended in 1998 and as a result, the plan area has been graded, streets and infrastructure supporting the plan area has been installed and some of the auto dealers have occupied other portions of the plan area. This is supported by the existing regional commercial zoning designation for the entire Specific Plan Area. The loss of potential habitat to rare, threatened or endangered species has already been evaluated in the former environmental review process in 1997 and 1998. As the proposed Project would not develop outside of the Specific Plan Area, no new or more severe impacts to biological resources would occur as a result of Project implementation. Further Study Required: No further analysis is required regarding this topic. VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b. Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? Documentation: Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant Impact Mitigated Impact No Impact As concluded in the 1998 SEIR, Energy and Mineral Resource impacts were determined to' be less than significant. The proposed Project would develop 334,117 square feet of commercial uses within Planning Area III of the Specific Plan Area which is substantially less than the Previously Approved Square Footage. Consequently, the proposed Project is less intense that what was originally approved. It should be noted that there is a direct relationship between the size and scale of a Project and the total amount of energy and mineral resources required for the development, assuming similar uses. Consequently, the total energy and mineral resources required for the Project has also been reduced. The proposed Project would not develop any uses that would be inconsistent with the former environmental analysis. No new or more severe impacts would occur. n 0 23 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2002 Further Study Required: No further analysis is required regarding this topic. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: Significant Unless Significant Impact Mitigated Impact No Impact a. A risk of accidental explosion or release of El F-1 a hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b. Possible interference with an emergency response ❑ plan or emergency evacuation plan? 0 F-1 M c. The creation of any health hazard or potential health a ❑ hazard? F-1 d. Exposure of people to existing sources of potential a F-1 health hazards? El e. Increased fire hazard in areas with Flammable El a a brush, grass, or trees?V\J Documentation: Hazard impacts, as concluded in the 1998 SEIR, were determined to be less than significant. The proposed Project would develop 334,117 square feet of commercial uses within Planning Area III of the Specific Plan Area which is substantially less than the Previously Approved Square Footage. Consequently, the proposed Project is less intense that what was originally approved. As such, hazard issues associated with originally analyzed construction, and operational characteristics of the Project would also be reduced as there is a direct relationship between size and scale of a Project and the potential for hazardous occurrences. As the potential for hazardous impacts has already been analyzed in the Previous EIRs. This Project does not alter. that analysis. Further Study Required: No further analysis is required regarding this topic. 33 037 24 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2002 Potentially Potentially Significant Less than X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: Significant Unless Significant Impact Mitigated Impact No Impact a. Increases in existing noise levels? El a a b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? F1 a a LLN Documentation: The Previous EIRs determined that construction noise would temporarily increase local noise levels, which could lead to complaints at some nearby residential areas. This impact was determined to be adverse but not significant. The developed site would increase noise levels on and immediately surrounding the Project site, but was not predicted to exceed City standards contained in the City's Municipal Code. Deliveries for some commercial uses, such as grocery stores, could occur during nighttime hours when people are most sensitive to noise, causing a potential significant impact. Project traffic would add to cumulative traffic volumes on the surrounding street system, near several sensitive receptor locations. With the implementation of the previously approved mitigation measures, noise impacts would be less than significant. Noise impacts associated with the buildout of Planning Area III have been previously analyzed based on full buildout of the Previously Approved Square Footage. However, as the current Project would develop less than the total allowable building space in a land use configuration similar to that which was originally analyzed, noise impacts resulting from construction, operation and mobile sources would be less that previously approved and analyzed in the SEIR. As all uses within the Specific Plan Area are commercial in nature, noise associated with the Project would not generate any significant impacts to on site uses. However, existing residential uses are located to the southwest of the proposed Retail B Building. Additionally, although vacant land zoned as regional commercial exists to the east and south of the Project site, the regional commercial zone may be developed with up to 16 dwelling units per acre. Therefore, there is a potential for future residential uses to be located adjacent to a portion of the proposed commercial uses. Noise generated from the proposed commercial uses could affect the existing and potential residential uses near the Project site. As shown on the proposed site plan, both retail buildings A and B have been located 60 feet from the eastern Project boundary. Given the land use configuration of the proposed Project, the buildings themselves would serve to attenuate noise generated from within the entire Specific Plan Area to potential residential uses that could be located to the east of the Project site. This is because all activities from within the site, including mobile source noise, parking lot cleaning and outdoor activities, would be blocked by the retail structures themselves from traveling further east. Assuming a worst -case scenario, noise impacts to potential future residents would most likely result from delivers to the loading docks on the eastern and western side of the Retail B Building. In order to make a reasonable assumption regarding future delivery schedules, truck delivery rates from Wal-Mart Supercenters were utilized. Typically, Wal-Mart Supercenters average 60 deliveries per week. These deliveries would arrive at the store and either utilize the western or eastern loading docks. Each of these docks are recessed and have a 3 foot support wall around them. The trucks would back into these docks at'which time they would be unloaded. Given that the unloading would occur within the loading dock that is recessed and behind the truck, noise associated with the unloading process would not be significant. Consequently, the only potential significant activities would be the trucks maneuvering into position to deliver goods and leave the site. Noises associated with truck deliveries usually include engines starting and doors opening and closing. Of these types of noises, back up signals while the delivery truck is maneuvering into position could be the most audible. Noise monitoring of delivery truck activity was conducted at a supermarket in November ber 1999 by 03� 25 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2002 Impact Sciences. Monitoring was conducted about 25 feet away from a lightweight van, a medium-sized truck and a tractor -trailer truck making deliveries. Over a 10 minute monitoring period, these trucks generated a 56.7 dB(A) Lq noise level. This is a relatively low noise level. Instantaneous noise levels monitored while a tractor -trailer took two minutes to enter the area, turn, and back up averaged 62.0 dB(A) L,.q. A small truck using a backup horn averaged 70.0 dB(A) Ley over the 30 seconds that it backed up. This monitoring demonstrates that over an average 10 minute period, the existing noise level would be increased by only about 0.5 dB (A) by the 56.7 dB(A) Lq noise level generated by 3 trucks. It should be noted that changes in a community noise level of less than 3.0 dB(A) are not typically noticed by the human earl Changes from 3.0 to 5.0 dB(A) may be noticed by some individuals who are extremely sensitive to changes in noise. A greater than 5.0 dB(A) increase is readily noticeable, while the human ear perceives a 10.0 dB(A) increase in sound level to be a doubling of sound. The City of La Quinta's zoning ordinance has specific standards with regards to screening commercial and loading dock areas from residential uses to minimize the effects of noise and aesthetics on sensitive receptors. For example, § 9.100.300, 9.100.050 and 9.100.210 all include regulations that would screen the loading docks from the potential future residential uses that could be located to the south or east of the Project site with a wall. With a 6-foot perimeter wall along the eastern and southern property boundary acting as a noise barrier, noise from the Retail B Building loading area would be attenuated by approximately 5 dB(A). Therefore, utilizing the tractor -trailer noise level of 62 dB(A) at 25 feet, including the attenuation provided by the solid perimeter wall and accounting for the distance to the property boundary, instantaneous noise levels resulting from truck deliveries to the Wal-Mart Supercenter are expected to be approximately 51 d(A), at the property boundary. It should be noted that actual noise levels would be less at the residential property as they are located further than 100 feet away. It should also be noted that this noise level is not a CNEL noise value. The city's noise ordinance allows for the land use noise standard plus 5 dB(A) for any 5 minute period. Given that the residential uses are considered sensitive receptors; the most restrictive noise standard for this use is 50 dB(A) between 10 PM and 7 AM. For any five minute period, such as a truck maneuvering into position, the La Quinta Noise Ordinance allows for community noise levels plus 5 dB(A). As the resulting noise level is less than 55dB(A), no new or more severe impacts are expected as a result of noise generated from tractor -trailer deliveries. Further Study Rgquired: No further analysis is required regarding this topic. XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect Potentially upon, or result in a need for new or altered government Potentially Significant Less than services in any of the following areas: Significant Impact Unless Mitigated Significant Impact No Impact a. Fire protection? E] El El b. Police protection? F� a FI ';;�71 V\J c. Schools? E] E a d. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? 1:1a ❑ k2si e. Other governmental services? a R [23 Documentation: Project development was anticipated to increase demand for services by the Riverside County Sheriff and Fire Departments. Both departments indicated that the Project would not have a significant impact on service 1 Highway Noise Fundamentals, d1 g y (Springfield, Virginia: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway 3 � v Administration, September 1980), p. 81. 26 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2002 levels in the City of La Quinta or other surrounding environs. Project development was also anticipated to contribute to increasing demand for services provided by the Riverside County Sheriff and Fire Departments along the Highway 111 corridor and throughout the Coachella Valley. Plans to add a Sheriff's substation at Kohl Ranch, and another fire station along the Highway 111 corridor in La Quinta were sufficient to mitigate cumulative impacts to less than significant levels. The proposed Project would be developed within Planning Area III of the Specific Plan Area. As currently proposed, the Project would develop substantially less than the Previously Approved Square Footage. As a result, the Project would be of a smaller scale and intensity than originally analyzed. Therefore, impacts to both fire and sheriff services would be less than originally forecasted. No new or more severe impacts would occur as a result of Project implementation. Further Study Required: No further analysis is required regarding this topic. 33 0 41) 27 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2002 1 XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the Potentially proposal result in a need for neui systems, or substantial alterations to the follouiing utilities:: Potentially Significant Significant Unless Less than Significant Impact Mitigated Impact No Impact a. Power or natural gas? � a ❑ b. Communications systems? F� El F-1 c. Local or regional water treatment? El F-1 d. Sewer or septic tanks? El El F-1 M e. Stormwater drainage? El Q El E f. Solid waste disposal?F-1 F-1 a V\J Documentation: The prior EIRs estimated that the Project would consume roughly 522-acre feet of water per year. The Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) indicated that this demand would not exceed their current or projected water supplies. No substantial water system improvements were needed to serve the Project and no wasteful water use or practices were anticipated. CVWD studies projected a continued overdraft of regional groundwater supplies as the Coachella Valley continues to grow. Water storage and distribution facilities will need to be expanded substantially to accommodate growth. No significant Project or cumulative impacts were identified in the prior EIRs. The Project was calculated to generate roughly 7,900 tons of construction wastes and between 2,040 and 2,400 tons of solid wastes per year at full occupancy. It was determined that if construction and operational controls are implemented to divert wastes from landfills, in accordance with local and state regulations, impacts would be less than significant. The Edom Hill Landfill was the only landfill available to dispose of solid wastes from the Coachella Valley. Solid waste reduction, reuse and recycling efforts were needed to minimize cumulative solid waste impacts and meet the requirements of AB 939 to reduce total landfill disposal. Given the shortage of local landfill capacity at the time the EIR was prepared, cumulative impacts were considered significant. The proposed Project would only develop 334,117 square feet of commercial retail uses in Planning Area III which is substantially less than the Previously Approved Square Footage. Since there is a direct relationship between the size and scale of a development and its overall water demand, the reduction in total building area would result in an overall decrease in the amount of water required for the Project. Therefore, as the total amount of water required for the proposed Project is less than that previously required for the Proposed Project, no new or more severe impacts would occur. There is also a direct relationship between the size and scale of the development and its overall solid waste generation, the reduction in total building area would result in an overall decrease in the amount of solid waste generated by the Project. Additionally, it should be noted that since the prior EIRs were prepared, additional landfill sites have been developed. Specifically, Azusa Land Reclamation Co, Lamb Canyon Disposal Site and the Spadra Sanitary Landfill are all available for waste disposal from the Project site.1 Therefore, as the total amount of solid waste generated by the proposed Project is less and the availability of additional disposal site is greater, no new or more severe impacts would occur. It should be noted that, as new landfill space has been afforded to the City of La Quinta, cumulative solid waste impacts originally identified in the environmental impact reports have in fact been reduced. California Integrated Waste Management Website, February, 2002 http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/ ") 33 u 4 1. 28 Draft Addendum to the Centre at !a Quints February 2002 Further Study Required: No further analysis is required regarding this topic. 33ti� �)4� 29 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2002 Potentially Potentially Significant Less than XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: Significant Unless Significant Impact Mitigated Impact No Impact a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? F1 F1 F-1 b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? 0 0 c. Create light or glare? a El ❑ Documentation: The developed Specific Plan Area would replace a formerly vacant area. The proposed arrangement and size of buildings in the mixed -regional commercial areas along Highway 111 would substantially obstruct views of the Santa Rosa Mountains from westbound lanes of Highway 111, which was identified as a significant impact. Proposed landscape setbacks along Highway 111 and Adams Street were consistent with City's policies for primary and secondary image corridors, while the proposed development intensity war, below the maximum allowed under the City's General Plan for Mixed/Regional Development. Proposed berming provided along Highway 111 would not fully screen views of vehicles in regular new vehicle display areas located between the special vehicle display pads along Highway 111 or vehicles displayed on the rest of the dealership pads. This was not consistent with the standards in Section 9.1501.1 of the La Quinta Municipal Code for the screening of parking areas and the Highway 111 Design Theme guidelines for screening "outdoor storage/display areas." This inconsistency represented a significant aesthetic impact. Unscreened views of entrances in and out of dealership/repair buildings on Pads 1, 2, and 3 was also a significant aesthetic impact. Project development would continue expansion of commercial development along Highway 111 corridor as envisioned in La Quinta General Plan. However, with implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, no significant Project or cumulative impacts were anticipated. As discussed above, the Project would develop substantially less than the Previously Approved Square Footage as originally analyzed in the Previous EIRs. As a result, the Project would be of a smaller scale and intensity. Additionally, as the Project is within a specific plan, all building, landscape and other design features would be subject to consistency with the guidelines established within the plan area. As a result of the Project being less intense than what was formerly approved and since it would be constructed in a manner consistent with other uses in the plan area, no new or more severe impacts would occur as a result of Project implementation. Further Study Required: The Project's potential aesthetic impacts should be studied further. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: Significant Impact Unless Mitigated Significant Impact No Impact a. Disturb paleontological resources? 1:1 El F -1 17 V\J b. Disturb archaeological resources? El F] F-1 `-vI LnJ c. Affect historical resources? a El El F1 d. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? a17 e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ❑ ❑ 337 043 30 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2002 Documentation: Previous site surveys did not identify any significant cultural resources within the plan area. Site grading and development was not expected to have a significant impact on cultural resources, however, there is always some potential for buried undiscovered artifacts to be damaged during grading activities. Project and cumulative impacts were deemed less than significant with mitigation. The proposed Project would develop all land uses within the boundary of the specific plan. As originally reviewed in the former environmental impact reports, the proposed land uses would be developed in a manner consistent with the original land use configuration. It should be noted that the total amount of building space would be less than what was originally analyzed. As no part of the proposed Project would be developed outside of the area that has previously undergone cultural resource surveys, the proposed Project would not disturb any un-surveyed land. As a result, the proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts from that of the approved Project. Further Study Required: No further analysis is required regarding this topic. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: Significant Unless Significant Impact Mitigated Impact No Impact a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional El ❑ parks of other facilities? b. Affect existing recreational opportunities? ❑ ❑1[n7l Documentation: As concluded in the 1998 SEIR, Recreational impacts were determined to be less than significant. There are no residential uses planned for the site. The proposed Project would not develop any uses that would be inconsistent with the former environmental analysis. No new or more severe impacts would occur. Further Study Required: No further analysis is required regarding this topic. XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Does the project have the potential to significantly degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? c. Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage of long-term, 31 Potentially Potentially Significant Significant Unless Impact Mitigated *11110_1 Less than Significant Impact No Impact DLnJ F-1 F-1 El LnJ 044 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2002 environmental goals? b. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause significant adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Documentation: Nothing in the proposed Project would result in any new or more sever impacts, than those previously disclosed in the Previous EIRs. Therefore, the Project would not, apart from any impacts previously addressed in the 1997 and 1998 EIRs, significantly degrade the quality of the environment, achieve short-term goals at the disadvantage of long-term goals, have individually limited but cumulatively significant impacts, nor would it result in impacts that would cause a significant adverse impact to humans. Further Studer uired: No further analysis is required regarding this topic. 33 045 32 Draft Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta February 2002 APPENDIX A Natelson Report 040 MARKET IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE CENTRE AT LA QUINTA Revised February 11, 2002 Prepared for: Impact Sciences Prepared by: THE NATELSON COMPANY, INC. 24835 E. La Palma Avenue, Suite I Yorba Linda, California 92887 Telephone: (714) 692-9596 Fax: (714) 692-9597 3 4 047 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................1 11. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...............................................................................................3 111. RETAIL DEMAND ANALYSIS......................................................................................7 APPENDIX A: RETAIL DEMAND MODEL — LA QUINTA RETAIL TRADE AREA 34 >-N 043 I. INTRODUCTION This report evaluates the potential economic impacts of the proposed Centre at La Quinta retail development. The project site is located on Highway 111 just east of Washington Street in the City of La Quinta. For purposes of this analysis the project is assumed to include the following land uses: A Wal-Mart "Supercenter" store totaling 228,218 square feet; • A Kohl's store totaling 86,584 square feet; 13 specialty stores totaling 19,200 square feet; and • An eight -pump gas station. The Wal-Mart "Supercenter" would include 60,000 square feet devoted to supermarket -type sales, with the balance of the store devoted to general merchandise space. The general merchandise component would replace the existing Wal-Mart store located across Highway 111 from the subject site, and add about 40,000 square feet of new general merchandise space over and above what currently exists across the street. Per the applicant's current plans, the analysis assumes that the project would open in October 2003. Given the size, location and proposed anchor tenants of the proposed project, the analysis considers potential demand levels in an overall trade area defined by a five -mile radius centered at the intersection of Highway 111 and Washington Street. The analysis further assumes that the project would derive its core market support from a primary market area defined by a three- mile radius around this intersection. The balance of the overall five -mile trade area is treated as a secondary market area (where the project would achieve lower shares of overall market demand). The economic impact analysis addresses four key issues: 1. The extent to which there will be sufficient consumer demand to support the Wal-Mart grocery component without negatively impacting the long-term market shares of existing supermarkets in the trade area; 2. The extent to which there will be sufficient demand to support the Kohl's store and the 40,000 square feet of new Wal-Mart general merchandise space without negatively impacting the long-term market shares of existing general merchandise (department) stores in the trade area; 3. The extent to which there will be sufficient demand to support the 19,200 square feet of specialty store space without negatively impacting the long-term market shares of existing specialty/apparel stores in the trade area; and 4. The extent to which there will be sufficient demand to support re -use of the existing Wal- Mart site with other retail facilities, thereby preventing the creation of long-term blight at the existing site. Per Section 15131(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, a project's economic impacts are considered significant only if they can be tied to direct physical impacts. For purposes of the economic analysis prepared for this project, The Natelson Company, Inc. (TNCI) has established the following criteria to determine if the project's market impacts would be significant enough to create a lasting physical change in a market area: 343 THE NATELSON COMPANY, INC. 050 • Any diversion of sales from existing retail facilities would have to be severe enough to result in business closures; and The business closures would have to be significant enough in scale (i.e., in terms of the total square footage affected and/or the loss of key "anchor" tenants) to affect the viability of existing shopping centers or districts. As it relates to the planned closure of the existing Wal-Mart store across the street from the proposed project, the potential blighting impact of this move would only be deemed significant if there were no foreseeable market demand to replace the closed store with other "anchor tenant" retail uses. 34 ? ,.t THE NATELSON COMPANY, INC. 051. II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. PROJECTED RETAIL SALES VOLUMES OF PROPOSED PROJECT The analysis assumes that the proposed project would generate the following new retail sales in the trade area: Table II-1 Potential New Retail Sales in Trade Area The Centre at La Quinta Building Square Feet Sales per Square Foot Total Sales Volume Anticipated Sales Volumes: General Merchandise -- Wal-Mart' 40,000 $300.0 $12 000 00 -- Kohl's 86,584 $230.91 $20 000 00 TotallAvera a 126,584 $322.8 $32 000 00 Wal-Mart(grocery component) 60,000 $400.0 $24 000 00 S ecial Retail 19 200 $250.0d $4 800 00 Source: TNCI B. POTENTIAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS This section briefly summarizes the consultant's findings relative to the four major issues evaluated by this study. Issue 1: Potential Impact of Wal-Mart Grocery Sales Magnitude of Potential Impact: For purposes of this analysis Wal-Mart's grocery sales are estimated at approximately $24 million per year. Projected Growth in Grocery Demand: Within the evaluated trade area, total demand for grocery sales is projected to grow by $20.2 million between now and the proposed project's opening date in October 2003. We estimate that cumulative growth in grocery demand (over and above 2002 levels) will reach $24 million (the amount needed to fully support Wal-Mart's grocery sales) by February 2004. Thus, while the project may result in some initial diversion of sales from existing stores, ongoing growth of the overall market will fully mitigate this impact within approximately four months of the project's opening. 'The indicated square footage and sales volume for the Wal-Mart general merchandise space includes only the incremental space over and above Wal-Mart's existing La Quinta store (since this incremental space is the only amount the represents a new competitive impact in the market area). THE NATELSON COMPANY, INC. 5 Conclusion Regarding Significance of Impact: Based on the above projections, TNCI does not believe that the Wal-Mart grocery component will have a significant competitive impact on existing food stores in the trade area. As indicated above, incremental demand for food sales (resulting from anticipated population growth) will be sufficient to fully absorb Wal-Mart's grocery sales within about four months of the project's opening. Moreover, any short-term negative impacts to existing supermarkets would be spread over a number of stores and in total would represent only about 2% of existing grocery sales in the trade area. Issue 2: Potential Impact of Kohl's/Wal-Mart General Merchandise Sales Magnitude of Potential Impact: For purposes of this analysis it is assumed that the project would generate approximately $32 million per year in new general merchandise sales. Projected Growth in General Merchandise Demand: Within the evaluated trade area, total demand for general merchandise sales is projected to grow by $15.6 million between now and the proposed project's opening date in October 2003. We estimate that cumulative growth in general merchandise demand (over and above 2002 levels) will reach $32 million (the amount needed to fully support the new general merchandise sales) by April 2005. Thus, while the project may result in some initial diversion of sales from existing stores, ongoing growth of the overall market will fully mitigate this impact within approximately 18 months of the project's opening. Conclusion Regarding Significance of Impact: TNCI does not believe that the project's general merchandise sales will have a significant competitive impact on existing stores in the trade area. As indicated above, incremental demand for general merchandise sales (resulting from anticipated population growth) will be sufficient to fully absorb the project's sales within about 18 months of the project's opening. While this would theoretically suggest that existing general merchandise stores in the five -mile trade area would be temporarily impacted by the proposed project, the reality of current retail shopping patterns in the Coachella Valley is that a significant portion of existing general merchandise demand in the La Quinta/Indio area "leaks" to the concentration of "big box" facilities in Palm Desert. TNCI estimates this current leakage at about $45 million per year. Thus, the short-term (18-month) competitive impact of the proposed project would be spread over a larger geographic area than just the five -mile trade area considered in this analysis. As a result, any short-term impacts to individual stores are likely to be relatively small in percentage terms (i.e., less than 5% of current sales volumes). THE NATELSON COMPANY, INC. 34 - 053 Issue 3• Potential Impact of Specialty Store Sales Magnitude of Potential Impact: It is estimated that the project would generate approximately $4.8 million per year in new "specialty" store sales. For purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that these stores would fall into the following retail sales categories: Apparel, Home Furnishings, and Specialty. Projected Growth in Specialty Store Demand: Within the evaluated trade area, total demand for Apparel, Home Furnishings and Specialty sales is projected to grow by $21.5 million between now and the proposed project's opening date in October 2003. Thus, the new "specialty" store sales associated with the proposed project would be fully supportable within projected incremental demand. Conclusion Regarding Significance of Impact: Given the significant growth in trade area demand and the relatively small amount of specialty store space planned for the proposed project, no competitive impact is projected. Issue 4• Demand for Re -Use of Existingi Wal-Mart Site "Candidate" Tenant Types for Re -Use of Existing Wal-Mart Site. The existing La Quinta Wal-Mart store totals approximately 127,000 square feet and serves as the anchor tenant for the eastern portion of the "111 La Quinta Center" (which extends from the northeast corner of Washington Street and Highway 111). In TNCI's opinion, the most appropriate candidates for re- use of the existing site would be one or more "big box" retail stores. This conclusion is premised on the following facts: • . The overall Washington/111 vicinity is currently evolving into a de facto "power center" with the existing Wal-Mart and Lowe's stores, the planned Staples store (under construction in the 111 La Quinta Center), and the proposed Kohl's and Wal-Mart "Supercenter"; • The concentration of automobile dealerships in this vicinity (another retail use that tends to draw a regional patronage) further strengthens the rationale for expanded power center type tenants; and The eastern portion of the Coachella Valley is currently "under -stored" in the big box category. In addition to the stores mentioned above, the only other stores in this category are the Home Depot and Big Kmart stores in Indio. At present, much of the east Valley's resident demand for these types of uses "leaks" to facilities in Palm Desert. Within the big box genre of stores, there are no obvious candidates for single -use facilities that could fill the entire 127,000 square feet currently occupied by Wal-Mart. The only big box stores that are typically in this size range are general merchandise stores (e.g., Target, Costco and Sam's Club) and home improvement stores (e.g., Lowe's and Home Depot). With the development of Kohl's and the Wal-Mart "Supercenter", and the existing Big K-Mart, Lowe's, and Home Depot stores, it is unlikely that there will be near -term demand for either general merchandise or home improvement stores to fill the existing Wal-Mart space. A more likely scenario for re -use of the existing Wal-Mart site would be for the space to be sub- divided (or redeveloped) for use by two or three smaller big box stores. These would complement the existing (and planned) uses in the area and would serve to recapture some portion of the demand that currently leaks to facilities in Palm Desert. rHE NATELSON COMPANY, INC_ Projected Demand for New Retail Uses Suitable for the Subject Site. The quantitative retail analysis in Appendix A evaluates potential demand for various categories of big box tenants (see Table A-15). Based on this analysis, TNCI believes that the following types of stores would be appropriate candidates for the subject site: Apparel Stores (current demand estimated at 50.000 sauare feet) • Marshalls (size ranges from 24,000 to 50,000 square feet) • TJ Maxx (typical size is 25,000 to 35,000 square feet) • Ross Dress for Less (typical size is 30,000 square feet) Furnishinas/Appliance Stores (current demand estimated at 50.000 sauare feet) • Circuit City (typical size is 33,500 square feet) • Best Buy (typical size is 30,000 to 45,000 square feet) • Bed Bath and Beyond (size ranges from 20,000 to 85,000 square feet) • Linens 'N Things (typical size is 35,000 to 40,000 square feet) Specialty "Bia Box" Stores (current demand estimated at 190,000 square feet) • Petco (typical size is 12,000 to 16,000 square feet) • Petsmart (typical size is 26,000 square feet) • Toys 'R' Us (typical size is 50,000 square feet) • Sportmart (size ranges from 13,000 to 40,000 square feet) Conclusion Regarding Significance of Impact: Given the excellent retail location of the subject site and the overall strength of the La Quinta retail market, TNCI believes that it is highly unlikely that closure of the existing Wal-Mart store would result in long -tern physical blight. Since this part of the Coachella Valley is generally underserved with "big box" retail stores (except in the general merchandise and home improvement categories noted previously), TNCI believes there would be significant opportunities to re -use the existing site with big box stores in the apparel, furnishings/appliance and specialty categories. Total demand in these three categories is estimated at approximately 290,000 square feet currently and is projected to grow to approximately 320,000 square feet over the next three years. Given that the amount of anticipated demand represents about 2.5 times the space that would be vacated by Wal-Mart, TNCI believes it is reasonable to conclude that alternative retail uses could be attracted to the vacated site. THE NATELSON COMPANY. INC. - - -()5� C ca c O O1 C Cl) M L aQ N Y1 Em �g N O N t� ~ E.� l6 i Z o. L m yvid �ZJ N E CD =Lfn N- l0 Cl m aU W �QT1� C Q _ m c E MJ- pm� on , L N aN RE gC�U G as 3 ®L L LQD ..0 a 0 cj V o O OU 000 III, LA QUINTA RETAIL TRADE AREA - RETAIL DEMAND ANALYSIS This section examines potential retail demand associated with the population residing in the market area that would be served by The Centre at La Quinta project. The analysis projects future retail demand of residents in City of La Quinta as well as the resident demand of surrounding communities that would shop at the proposed facility. This analysis covers the time period from January 2002 to April 2005. Market Area Boundaries For purposes of this study, the market area boundaries have been defined in terms of two radii (each is centered on the intersection of Washington Street and Highway 111): Primary Market Area (PMA): 0-3 mile; and Secondary Market Area (SMA): 3-5 mile. For purposes of this report, the entire market area (i.e., Primary and Secondary Market Areas combined) is referred to herein as the La Quinta Retail Trade Area (LQRTA). The smaller three-mile market area represents local resident demand contained within portions of Indian Wells, Indio, La Quinta and Palm Desert that will represent the proposed project's core market support. The secondary market area includes the remaining portions of Indian Wells, Indio, La Quinta and the majority of the population of Palm Desert. Due to the availability of competitive retail facilities in closer proximity to some SMA residents (especially those in Palm Desert), the total retail demand of this market segment has been discounted to 50 to 60 percent, depending on the retail category. These capture rates of SMA demand take into account the market shares of existing and proposed retail facilities in the Palm Desert area, such as the Desert Gateway project and neighborhood -serving retail centers. (A further explanation of this provided in "Capture Rate Analysis" later in this section.) It should be noted that each of the market areas also includes the unincorporated areas of Riverside County that are located to the north of the Interstate 10 Freeway. It is likely that the project will derive some patronage from outside the defined Trade Area. However, in an attempt to remain analytically conservative, TNCI has excluded this potential market support from the demand analysis. Figure I provides a geographic representation of the market areas. 35 1 THE NATELSON COMPANY, INC. APPENDIX A: RETAIL DEMAND MODEL (LA QUINTA RETAIL TRADE AREA) 3:5 t 058 Table A-1 Population Projections La Quints Retail Trade Area January October April October April Area 2002 2003 2004 2004 2005 Primary Market Area (PMA) Residents Y °`i MINIM, `"� .10..,.,emu+ ,y nZI mm,. Part -Time Residents (FTE)`` i `9' k"`?` �.. rl - Subtotal, PMA 54,566 58,412 59,557 60,748 61,939 Secondary Market Area (SMA) Residents _ ,�=4� ,. r•},,r - : ?: ; f� * Y'� y Part -Time Residents (FTE) , Subtotal, PMA 80,526 86,201 87,891 89,650 91,408 Total Market Area 135,092 144,613 147.448 150,398 153.347 Source: ESRI_Business-in%rmatid Sys%m-s (515) TheNafeTsonn Company nc.' _-- Table A-2 Per Capita Income Projections La Quints Retail Trade Area In constant dollars Primary Market Area (PMA): Secondary Market Area (SMA): Annual Increase Factor Area Primary Market Area (PMA) Secondary Market Area (SMA) Source: ESRI BIS; TNCI January 2002 $26,051 $21.832 January 2002 +�3i{ } October April October 2003 2004 2004 $26,966 $27,233 $27,505 $22,599 $22,823 $23,051 April 2005 $23,279 Table A-3 Total Income and Potential Retail Sales Projections La Guinta Retail Trade Area In thousands of constant dollars Percent of Income Spent for Retail Goods, PMA Visitor and Business Spending Total, PMA 40.0% Percent of Income Spent for Retail Good, SMA, Visitor and Business Spending - Total, SMA 40.0% January October April October April Area 2002 2003 2004 2004 2005 Total Income: -----P mary-Market-Ares --$1,421,497 ------S1;57S;1-22- -4162109- -- - - 441-A70.877 -- ;4,720,503 Secondary Market Area $1,758.077 $1.948,074 $2.005,933 $2.066,528 $2,127,925 Total $3,179,573 $3,523.196 $3.627,832 $3,737,404 $3,848,428 Potential Retail Sales: Primary Market Area Residents Business/Visitors Subtotal Secondary Market Area Residents Business/Visitors Subtotal Total Potential Retail Sales Source: TNCI $497.524 $551,293 $567,665 $584.807 $602,176 $71,075 $78,756 $81.095 $83,544 $86,025 $568.599 $630,049 $648,760 $668.351 $688,201 $615,327 $681.826 $702,076 $723,285 $744,774 $87.904 $97,404 $100,297 $103,326 $106,396 $703,231 $779,230 $802,373 $826,611 $851,170 $1,271,829 $1.409.279 $1.451.133 $1.494,962 $1,539,371 Table A - Distribution of Retail Sales by Retail Category La Cuinta Retail Trade Area Retail Category %Distribution 1102 %Distribution 10103 %Distribution 4104 %Distribution 10104 %Distribution 4105 Shopper Goods: Apparel 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% General Merchandise 14.55% 14.55% 14.55% 14.55% 14.55% Home Furnishings 3.65% 3.65% 3.65% 3.65% 3.65% Specialty 12.65% 12.65% 12.65% 12.65% 12.65% Subtotal 34.65% 34.65% 34.65% 34.65% 34.65% Convenience Goods: Food (Supermarkets/Liquor) 20.28% 20.28% 20.28% 20.28% 20.28% Eating and Drinking 9.63% 9.63% 9.63% 9.63% 9.63% Subtotal 29.91 % 29.91 % 29.91 % 29.91 % 29.91 % Heavy Commercial Goods: Building/ Hardware/ Farm 8.54% ' 8.54% 8.54% 8.54% 8.54% Auto Dealers and Parts 18.46% 18.46% 18.46% 18.46% 18.46% Service Stations 8.44% 8.44% 8.44% 8.44% 8.44% Subtotal 35.44% 35.44% 35.44% 35.44% 35.44% Total 100.00% 100.00°k 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Source: TNCI, based on historic trends reported by the State Board of Equalization for Riverside County. Of 61. Table A-5 Projected Demand for Retail Sales for Primary Market Area by Major Retail Category La Quints Retail Trade Area In thousands of constant dollars January October April Retail Category 2002 2003 2004 Shopper Goods: Apparel $21,604 $23,939 $24,650 General Merchandise $82,743 $91,685 $94,408 Fumiture/APPliances $20,762 $23.005 $23,689 Specialty $71,937 $79,711 $82.078 Subtotal $197,045 $218,340 $224,824 Convenience Goods: Food (Supermarkets/Liquor) $115,299 $127,760 $131,554 Eating and Drinking $54,746 $60,663 $62.465 Subtotal $170,045 $188,423 $194,018 Heavy Commercial Goods: Building/ Hardware/ Farm $48,570 $53,819 $55,418 Auto healers and Parts $104,935 $116,276 $119,729 Service Stations $48.003 $53,191 $54,770 Subtotal $201,509 $223,286 $229,917 Total $568,599 $630,049 $648.760 Source: TNCI October $97,258 $24,404 April $100.147 $25,129 $135.526 $139,552 $64,351 $66,262 5199,877 $205,814 $57,091 $58,787 $123,345 $127,008 Z668,351 $688,201 Table A4 0 Projected Demand for Retail Sales for Secondary Market Area by Major Retail Category La Quints Retail Trade Area In thousands of constant dollars January October April October April Retail Category 2002 2003 2004 2004 2005 Shopper Goods: Apparel $26.719 $29,607 $30.486 $31,407 $32,340 General Merchandise $102,334 $113.394 $116,761 $120.289 $123,862 Fumiture/Appliances $25,677 $28,452 $29,298 $30,183 $31,079 Specialty $88,970 $98,585 $101,513 $104.579 $107.686 Subtotal $243, 701 $270.038 $278.058 $286,457 $294,968 Convenience Goods: Food (Supermarkets/Liquor) $142,599 $158.010 $162,703 $167.618 $172,598 Eating and Drinking $67.709 $75,027 $77,255 $79,589 $81,953 Subtotal $210,309 $233,037 $239,958 $247.207 $254,551 Heavy Commercial Goods: Building/ Hardware/ Farm $60,071 $66,563 $68.540 $70,610 $72,708 Auto Dealers and Parts $129.782 $143.808 $148,079 $152.552 $157.084 Service Stations $59.369 $65,785 $67,739 $69.785 $71,858 Subtotal $249.221 $276,155 $284,357 $292,947 $301,650 Total $703,231 $779,230 $802,373 $826.611 $851,170 Source: TNCI E) 063 Table A-7 Potential Capture of Projected Primary Market Area Demand for Retail Sales Expressed in Percentages La Guinta Retail Trade Area January October April Retail Category 2002 2003 2004 Shopper Goods: Apparel 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% General Merchandise 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Fumiture/Appliances 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Specialty 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Convenience Goods: Food (Supermarkets/Liquor) 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Eating and Drinking 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Heavy Commercial Goods: Building/ Hardware/ Farm 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Auto Dealers and Parts 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Service Stations 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Table A-8 Potential Capture of Projected Secondary Market Area Demand for Retail Sales Expressed in Percentages La Guinta Retail Trade Area October April 2004 2005 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% January October April October Retail Category 2002 2003 2004 2004 Shopper Goods: Apparel 60.00% 60.00% 60.00% 60.00% General Merchandise 60.00% 60.00% 60.00% 60.00% Furniture/Appliances 60.00% 60.00% 60.00% 60.00% Specialty 60.00% 60.00% 60.00% 60.00% Convenience Goods: Food (Supermarkets/Liquor) 50.00% 50.00% 50.00% 50.00% Eating and Drinking 50.00% 50.00% 50.00% 50.00% Heavy Commercial Goods: Building/ Hardware/ Farm 60.00% 60.00% 60.00% 60.00% Auto Dealers and Parts 60.00% 60.00% 60.00% 60.00% Service Stations 60.00% 60.00% 60.00% 60.00% Source: TNCI April 60.00% 60.00% 60.00% 50.00% 50.00% 60.00% 60.00% 60.00% 3 U64 Table A-9 Potential Capture of Projected Primary Market Area Demand for Retail Sales La Quints Retail Trade Area In thousands of constant dollars January October April Retail Category 2002 2003 2004 Shopper Goods: Apparel $21,604 $23.939 $24,650 General Merchandise $82,743 $91,685 $94,408 Fumiture/Appliances $20 762 $23.005 S23.689 Specialty $71,937 $79.711 Subtotal $197,045 $218,340 Convenience Goods: Food (Supermarkets"uor) $115.299 $127.760 Eating and Drinking $54,746 $60,663 Subtotal $170,045 $188,423 Heavy Commercial Goods: Building/ Hardware/ Farm $48,570 $53,819 Auto Dealers and Parts $104,935 $116.276 Service Stations $48.003 $53,191 Subtotal $201,509 $223.286 Total $568,599 $630,049 Source: TNCI S131.554 $55,418 S119.729 October 2004 $25.394 $97.258 $24,404 $84,557 $231,613 $135,526 $64,351 $199,877 $57,091 S123.345 $229.917 $236,860 $648,760 $668,351 April $100.147 S25.129 S139.552 $58,787 S127.008 $243.895 $688,201 3a 063 Table A•10 Potential Capture of Projected Secondary Market Area Demand for Retail Sales La Quints Retail Trade Area In thousands of constant dollars Retail Category Shopper Goods: Apparel General Merchandise Fumiture/Appliances Specialty Subtotal Convenience Goods: Food (Supermarkets/Liquor) Eating and Drinking Subtotal Heavy Commercial Goods: Building/ Hardware/ Farm Auto Dealers and Parts Service Stations Subtotal Total Source: TNCI January October April October April 2002 2003 2004 2004 2005 $16,032 $17,764 $16,292 $18,844 $19,404 $61.401 $68,036 $70.057 $72.173 $74,317 $15,406 $17,071 $17,579 $18,110 $18,648 $53.382 $59.151 $60,908 $62,747 $64,612 $146,220 $162,023 $166,835 $171.874 $176.981 $71.300 $79,005 $81.352 $83,809 $86.299 $33.855 $37.513 $38.628 $39,794 $40,977 $105.154 $116,518 $119,979 $123,603 $127.276 $36,042 $39,938 $41,124 $42,366 $43.625 $77,869 $86,285 $88,647 $91,531 $94,251 $35.621 $39,471 $40.643 $41.871 $43.115 $149,533 $165,693 $170.614 $175.768 $180.990 $400,908 $444,234 $457,428 $471,246 $485,247 Table A-11 Total Potential Capture for Retail Sales for Total Market Area La Guinta Retail Trade Area In thousands of constant dollar: January October April October April Retail Category 2002 2003 2004 2004 2005 Shopper Goods: Apparel $37.636 $41,703 $42,941 $44.238 $45.552 General Merchandise $144.143 $159.721 $164,464 $169,432 $174,464 Fumiture/Appliances $36,168 $40,077 $41,267 $42,513 $43,776 Specialty $125,318 $138,862 $142,986 $147,304 $151,680 Subtotal $343,265 $380,362 $391.659 $403,488 $415,473 Convenience Goods: Food (Supermarkets/Liquor) $186,599 $206,765 $212,905 $219,335 $225,851 Eating and Drinking $88,601 $98.176 $101.092 $104.145 $107,239 Subtotal $275,200 $304.941 $313.998 $323,481 $333.090 Heavy Commercial Goods: Building/ Hardware/ Farm $84,613 $93,757 $96,541 $99,457 $102,412 Auto Dealers and Parts $182.804 $202,561 $208,576 $214,876 $221.259 Service Stations $83,624 $92.662 $95,414 $98,295 $101,215 Subtotal $351,041 $388,979 $400,531 $412,628 $424.885 Total $969.506 $1,074,283 $1,106,188 $1,139,597 $1,173,448 Source: TNCI 3�, o67 Table A•12 Potential Distribution of Retail Sales by Type of Retail Location La Quints Retail Trade Area Traditional "Big Box"/ Neighborhood Other Retail Category Regional Community Retail Retail Retail' Shopper Goods: Apparel 40% 25% 15% 20% General Merchandise 25% 65% 10% 0% Furniture/Appliances 30% 40% 10% 20% Specialty 30% 30% 20% 20% Convenience Goods: Food (Supermarkets/Liquor) 5% 0% 80% 15% Eating and Drinking 15% 25% 20% 40% Heavy Commercial Goods: Building/Hardware/Garden 5% 55% 40% 0% Auto Dealers and Parts 0% 0% 0% 100% Service Stations 0% 0% 0% 100% • Includes goods sold outside of retail centers, such as in freestanding stores, downtown areas, mail order and the Internet. Source: TNCI 36 Table A-13 Potential Distribution of Retail Sales by Type of Retail Location La Guinta Retail Trade Area Traditional "Big Box"/ Neighborhood Retail Category Regional Community Retail Retail Shopper Goods: Apparel $200 $200 $200 General Merchandise $200 $400 $200 Fumiture/Appliances $200 $300 $200 Specialty $200 $200 $200 Convenience Goods: Food (Supermarkets/Liquor) $400 N/A $400 Ealing and Drinking $400 $400 $200 Heavy Commercial Goods: Building/Hardware/Garden $200 $200 $200 Auto Dealers and Parts N/A NIA N/A Service Stations N/A N/A NIA Source: TNCI, based on data from the Urban Land Institute. 2- () 63 Table A•14 Total Supportable Retail and Services Space -TRADITIONAL REGIONAL RETAIL La Cuinta Retail Trade Area Expressed in Square Feet Services Space Factor (as percentage of retail): 10.0% January October April Retail Category°°i 2003 2004 Shopper Goods: Apparel General Merchandise Fumiture/Appliances Specialty Subtotal Convenience Goods: Food (Supermarkets/Liquor) Eating and Drinking Subtotal Heavy Commercial Goods: Building/Hardware/Garden Auto Dealers and Parts Service Stations Subtotal Services Space TOTAL Source: TNCI 75,271 83,406 85,883 180,179 199.651 205,580 54,252 60,115 61,901 187,978 208,293 214,479 October April 2004 2005 88,477 91,105 211.789 218.081 63,770 65,664 220.956 227.520 497,679 551,465 567,843 684,993 602,370 23,325 25,846 26,613 27,417 28,231 33.225 36,816 37,910 39.054 40,215 56.550 62,662 64,523 66.471 68,446 21,153 23,439 24,135 24,864 25,603 N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 21,153 23,439 24,135 24,864 25.603 57,538 63,757 65,650 67,633 69.642 632,921 701,323 72Z 151 743,961 766,060 36 070 Table A•15 Total Supportable Retail and Services Space --"BIG BOX"/COMMUNITY RETAIL La Quints Retail Trade Area Expressed in Square Feet Services Space Factor (as percentage of retail): 5.0% January October April October April Retail Category 2002 2003 2004 2004 2005 Shopper Goods: Apparel 47,044 52,129 53,677 55,298 56,941 General Merchandise 234,232 259.546 267,255 275.326 283,505 Fumiture/Appliances 48,224 53,436 55,023 56,685 58,368 Specialty 187,978 208,293 214,479 220,956 227,520 Subtotal 517,478 573.404 590,433 608,265 626,334 Convenience Goods: Food (Supermarkets/Liquor) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Eating and Drinking 55,376 61,360 63,183 65,091 67,024 Subtotal 55,376 61,360 63,183 65,091 67,024 Heavy Commercial Goods: Building/Hardware/Garden 232.685 257,832 265,489 273,507 281,632 Auto Dealers and Parts N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Service Stations N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Subtotal 232.685 257.832 265,489 273,507 281.632 Services Space 40.277 44,630 45,955 47,343 48,749 TOTAL 845,816 937,225 965,060 994,206 1,023,739 Source: TNCI 364 u7 ). Table A46 Total Supportable Retail and Services Space -NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL La lQuints Retail Trade Area Expressed in Square Feet Services Space Factor (as percentage of retail): 20.0% January October Retail Category 2002 2003 Shopper Goods: Apparel 28,227 31,277 General Merchandise 72,072 79,860 Fumiture/Appliances 18,084 20,038 Specialty 125,318 138,862 Subtotal 243.701 270.038 Convenience Goods: Food (Supermarkets/Liquor) 373,197 413,530 Eating and Drinking 88,601 98,176 Subtotal 461,798 511,706 Heavy Commercial Goods: Building/Hardware/Garden 169,225 187,514 Auto Dealers and Parts N/A N/A Service Stations N/A N/A Subtotal 169,225 187.514 Services Space 43,736 48,463 GRAND TOTAL 918,461 1,017,721 Source: TNCI April October April 2004 2004 2005 32,206 33,179 34,164 82,232 84,716 87,232 20,634 21,257 21,888 142,986 147,304 151.680 278,058 286.455 294,965 425,811 438,671 451,701 101,092 104,145 107.239 526,903 542,816 558,940 193,083 198,914 204,823 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 193,083 198,914 204,823 49,902 51,409 52,936 1,047,946 1,079,595 1,111, 664 072 Table A47 Total Supportable Retail and Services Space -TOTAL RETAIL La Quints Retail Trade Area Expressed in Square Feet January Retail Category 2002 Shopper Goods: Apparel 150,542 General Merchandise 486,483 Fumiture/Appliances 120,560 Specialty 501,273 Subtotal 1,258,858 Convenience Goods: Food (Supermarkets/Liquor) 396,522 Eating and Drinking 177,202 Subtotal 573,724 Heavy Commercial Goods: BuOding/Hardware/Garden 423,064 Auto Dealers and Parts NIA Service Stations N/A Subtotal 423,064 Services Space 141,551 GRAND TOTAL 2,397,198 Source: TNCI October April 2003 2004 166,812 539.058 133,589 555,447 October April 2004 2005 171.766 176,953 182,210 555,067 571.831 588,818 137,557 141,711 145,921 571,943 589.217 606,720 1,394,906 1,436.333 1.479,713 1,523,668 439,375 452.424 466,088 479.933 196,353 202.184 208,291 214,478 635,728 654,608 674.378 694,410 468,785 482,707 497,286 512,058 N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 468.785 482,707 497.286 512,058 156,849 161.507 166,385 171,328 2,656,269 $735,156 $817,763 2.901,464 3 073 APPENDIX B TRAFFIC REPORT o74 r- Ut4 / RB�►NCRSROADS LA QUINTA AUTO MALL ACCESS EVALUATION (REVISED) City of La Quinta, California John Kain, AICP Carleton Waters, P.E. Bill Lawson, AICP Scott Sato, P.E. 41 Corporate Park, Suite 210 Irvine, CA 92606 p: 949.660.1994 • f: 949.660.1911 e: admin@urbanxroads.com 9 www.urbanxroads.com �H February 14, 2002 URBAN CROSSROADS 41 Corporate Park Mr. David Alpern Suite 210 IMPACT SCIENCES, INC. 30343 Canwood Street, Suite 210 Irvine, CA 92606 Aguora Hills, CA 91301 p: 949.660.1994 f: 949.660.1911 Subject: La Quinta Auto Mall Access Evaluation (Revised) Dear Mr. Alpem: TRANSPORTATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PLANNING RKJK and Associates, Inc. (RKJK) previously completed a traffic TRAVEL DEMAND study for the Centre at La Quinta in 1997, in connection with the MODELING preparation of an EIR for the Centre at La Quinta by Impact DATABASE Sciences, Inc. RKJK also completed a Supplemental Traffic Impact DEVELOPMENT Analysis in 1998 in association with the preparation of a GIs Supplemental EIR for the Centre at LA Quinta by Impact Sciences, TRAFFIC Inc.. ENGINEERING Urban Crossroads, Inc. recently completed a traffic access ACOUSTICAL STUDIES evaluation for the Center at La Quinta in September 2001, entitled the La Quinta Auto Mall Access Evaluation for submission to PARKING STUDIES Caltrans and has reviewed the 1997 and 1998 traffic impact TRAFFIC analysis completed by RKJK in preparing this letter report. Urban IMPACT STUDIES Crossroads, Inc. has now reviewed Stamko Development Company's proposed Site Development Permit, Conditional Use Permit, and Tentative Map applications reflecting the proposed development of two large Box Retail Stores (totaling approximately 314,802 square feet), a stand alone gas station (totaling John Kain, AICP approximately 115 square feet) and 13 specialty stores (totaling Carleton Waters, P.E. approximately 19,200 square feet) within the commercial retail, 6 i •3 Bill Lawson, AICP 076 Scott Sato, P.E. area (Planning Area 3) of the Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan ("the Project"). Based on our review of the proposed land use changes, and the completion of updated trip generation rates, trip distribution patterns, and the proposed internal circulation plan and review of the prior EIR's, Urban Crossroads, Inc. anticipates that there would be no new or more severe traffic impacts caused by the project than those previously disclosed and mitigated in the two prior EIR's for the Centre at La Quinta. With regard to Urban Crossroads Inc.'s recent La Quinta Auto Mall Access Evaluation Report (completed in September 2001), prepared in connection with Stamko Development Company's submission to Caltrans, Urban Crossroad's previously recommended certain improvements for ingress and egress from Highway 111 to the Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan Area. Stamko Development Company has implemented those recommended improvements in its proposed Site Development Permit submitted to the City. Any additional recommendations specified in this Letter Report, with respect to potential internal circulation issues, are purely optional recommendations, which do not effect the ultimate determination set forth above, i.e., that this proposed project does not result in any new or more severe adverse traffic impacts. INTRODUCTION The firm of Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to submit this revised access evaluation for the proposed La Quinta Auto Mall expansion. The proposed project is located south of Highway 111, between La Quinta Drive and Dune Palms Road in the City of La Quinta (see Exhibit A). Urban Crossroads, Inc. staff has discussed the project with Caltrans to determine the issues and a methodology to address the proposed access driveways. Several retail developments (totaling approximately 314,802 square feet), 13 specialty stores (totaling approximately 19,200 square feet), and a gas station with 16 fueling positions are the specific land uses proposed for this site. Exhibit B illustrates the site plan. As indicated in Exhibit B two right in/out driveways are proposed along SR 111. o7 4 EXHIBITA LOCATION MAP 3 'r 078 URBAN La QUINTA AUTO MALL, La Quinta, California - 00585:01 _ EXHIBIT-8 SITE PLAN M GHyy •wr wr.ms: HWY III ENTRY MONUMENT -- AY T 11 smN (EAST) ace --I a.�w0/OSFa pma 0/L7 ii0► HWY tit ENTA � kO JvN (WEST) GAS STATION SIGN .....SIGN FUTUM DEVEIMMENT AREA r. PETT3JTN 3 to / �' tit 073 URBaP- La QUINTA AUTO MALL, La Quinta, California - 00585:04 It is our understanding that a single right -turn in/out access driveway to Highway 111 is currently approved for this site and would-be located approximately 600 feet east of La Quinta Center Drive. Based on the current site plan including both a right turn in and a right turn in/out driveway, the westerly driveway (right turn in only) would be located approximately 370 feet east of La Quinta Center Drive and the easterly driveway (right turn in/out only) would be located approximately 350 feet further to the east. Therefore, to determine the feasibility of an additional driveway, this analysis focuses on comparing "Opening Year" (project buildout) conditions (Year 2003) with a single and dual driveway configuration. EXISTING CONDITIONS Exhibit C identifies the existing roadway conditions for study area roadways. The number of through traffic lanes for existing roadways and the existing intersection controls are identified. Traffic Volumes and Conditions Existing Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes on SR 111, west of Dune Palms Road are shown on Exhibit D. ADT volumes are based upon the latest traffic data collected by Urban Crossroads, Inc.. Exhibit D also illustrates AM and PM Peak. Hour intersection traffic volumes for existing conditions (Appendix "A" contains the traffic count worksheets). Adjustments have been made to the traffic data collected in the summer to reflect peak winter conditions. Historical traffic data has been provided by the City of La Quinta (See Appendix "A") for daily volumes along Highway 111 during the winter months. Based on this data, a factor of 1.22 has been applied to the summer volumes to reflect peak winter conditions. The technical guide to the evaluation of traffic operations is the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) (Transportation Research Board Special Report 209). The HCM defines level of service as a qualitative measure which describes operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. The criteria used to 5 u8 � EXHIBIT C EXISTING NUMBER OF THROUGH LANES AND INTERSECTION CONTROLS LEGEND: = TRAFFIC SIGNAL ® = ALL WAY STOP -r = STOP SIGN 4 = NUMBER OF LANES D = DIVIDED U = UNDIVIDED 3 o 8 URBJ La QUINTA AUTO MALL, La Quinta, California - 00585:03 evaluate LOS (Level of Service) conditions vary based on the type of roadway and whether the traffic flow is considered interrupted or uninterrupted. The definitions of level of service for uninterrupted flow (flow unrestrained by the existence of traffic control devices) are: LOS "A" represents free flow. Individual users are virtually unaffected by the presence of others in the traffic stream. LOS "B" is in the range of stable flow, but the presence of other users in the traffic stream begins to be noticeable. Freedom to select desired speeds is relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to maneuver. LOS "C" is in the range of stable flow, but marks the beginning of the range of flow in which the operation of individual users becomes significantly affected by interactions with others in the traffic stream. LOS "D" represents high -density but stable flow. Speed and freedom to maneuver are severely restricted, and the driver experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience. LOS "E" represents operating conditions at or near the capacity level. All speeds are reduced to a low, but relatively uniform value. Small increases in flow will cause breakdowns in traffic movement. LOS "F" is used to define forced or breakdown flow. This condition exists wherever the amount of traffic approaching a point exceeds the amount that can traverse the point. Queues form behind such locations. Itg;� TABLE 1 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES' DELAY' (SECS.) LEVEL OF SERVICE INTERSECTION TRAFFIC CONTROL NORTH- BOUND SOUTH- BOUND EAST- BOUND WEST- BOUND L T R L T R L T R L T R I AM PM AM PM Dune Palms Rd. (NS) at: • SR -Ill (EW) TS 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 27.8 26.97C C When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through: R = Right Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software: Traffix, Version 7.1.0607 (1999). Per the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. 3 TS = Traffic Signal U:\UcJobs\00585\Excefi(0058542.xis]T 1 f0 -85 1n For existing traffic conditions, the study. area intersection is currently operating at an acceptable Level of Service ("C") during the peak hours. Existing HCM calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix "B". TRIP GENERATION The anticipated traffic due to the proposed project expansion was determined based on trip rates included in the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation manual. Table 2 presents the trip rates used for the proposed retail and restaurant developments. Table 3 summarizes the expected daily and peak hour trip generation. As indicated in Table 3 approximately 17,500 trips per day and 523 AM peak hour and 1,626 PM peak hour trips are expected to occur. TRIP DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT The traffic from the proposed project has been assigned to the surrounding roadway system based on the proximity to the regional roadway system and the right in/out access restrictions. Exhibit E illustrates the traffic distribution patterns for a single driveway along Highway 111 for the retail/gas station developments. Similarly, Exhibit F illustrates the traffic distribution patterns for dual driveways along Highway 111. Traffic has been manually assigned to the project driveway(s) for the conditions with a single and dual right turn in/out driveway. Exhibits G and H illustrate the project only traffic volumes that are expected to occur for daily and peak hour conditions for a single and dual access driveway, respectively. FUTURE GROWTH An ambient growth rate has been applied to the existing data to account for future through traffic and other projects that are unknown at this time. A growth rate of 8 11 086 TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION RATES' PEAK HOUR TRIP RATES AM PM ITC r/fl%nC n1 IAKITiTV I INIT. IN nl IT IN CHJT DAILY RATE Gas Station 844 16 pos 6.26 6.01 7.43 7.13 168.56 Shopping Center (Walmart/Retail) 820 334.002 1 tsf 10.60 1 0.38 1 2.00 1 2.17 1 44.32 ' Source: ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, 1997 2 tsf = Thousand Square Feet pos = Vehicle fueling positions ' ''~ (Ij U:\UcJobs\00585\Excea[00585-02.xls]T 2 087 12 TABLE 3 LA QUINTA AUTO MALL TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY LAND USE QUANTITY UNITS PEAK HOUR DAILY AM PM IN OUT I IN OUT Gas Station 16 pos 100 96 119 114 2,697 Shopping Center (Walmart/Retail) 334.002 1 tsf 1 200 127 668 725 1 14,803 TOTAL 300 223 787 839 17,500 tsf = thousand square feet pos = Vehicle fueling positions U:\UcJobs\00585\Excel\[00585-02.xls]T 3 13 EXHIBIT E RETAIL 8 GAS STATION WITH ONE DRIVEWAY LEGEND: — — = INBOUND TRIP DISTRIBUTION = OUTBOUND TRIP DISTRIBUTION TRIP DISTRIBUTION 083 1 URBAN La QUINTA AUTO MALL, La Quinta, California - OOS8S:12 ewosBAN 14 ExHiair F RETAIL 8 GAS STATION WITH TWO DRIVEWAYS TRIP DISTRIBUTION o, I so I ,o fo:" -----� N� N� SITE LA QUINTA CENTER DR. LEGEND: — — — = INBOUND TRIP DISTRIBUTION OUTBOUND TRIP DISTRIBUTION 6 N Qa W Z G 0 40 40 3' 090 La QUINTA AUTO MALL, La Quinta, California - 00585:05 IJRBA! _ _ cwosswo..c 15 EXHIBIT G PROJECT PEAK HOUR AND DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH ONE DRIVEWAY I I I LEGEND: 15/84/9042 = AM PEAK HOUR/PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES/ADT 091. M La QUINTA AUTO MALL, La Quinta, California - 00585:07 URBAN caossRo..o _ 16 PROJECT PEAK HOUR AND ce 82/241/2625 —► OC in60/157/1750 W � N z W tJ Q Q LEGEND: 361/676/9042 - AM/PM/ADT EXHIBIT H DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH TWO DRIVEWAYS t-0/0 not o o--120/315 J f-0/0 22/84� '� t (' 89/336--- �`o 0/0-1 o 0 0 22/84/875--*'- 111/420/4375 " 60/157/1750---t Ncc O J m a tip W rn Z o � C SITE 38 � La QUINTA AUTO MALL, La Quinta, California - 00585:06 IJRBA! cwosBAL I 17 percent per year has been calculated from the daily traffic volumes provided by the City of La Quinta. The calculation is provided below: 1999 Daily Traffic Volume on Highway 111 (e/o Washington) = 23,272 2000 Daily Traffic Volume on Highway 111 (e/o Washington) = 251116 Estimated Annual Growth Rate = 25,116/23,272 = 1.079, or approximately 8 percent TRAFFIC IMPACTS Based on the anticipated trip generation and trip distribution/assignment of the proposed project, traffic has been evaluated at the key roadway and intersection locations. Exhibits I and J illustrate the Opening Year (2003) anticipated traffic volumes for one and two driveways, respectively. These traffic volumes on SR 111, at the project driveways, and at the intersection of Dune Palms Road/ SR 111 include the seasonal growth rate, the ambient growth rate, and the project traffic. DAILY CAPACITY REVIEW Based on discussions with Caltrans staff, Highway 111 is anticipated to be widened to six lanes prior to the opening year of this project (2003). The roadway capacity of a 6 lane urban arterial has been based on Riverside County Integrated Plan Calculations. The evaluation of the additional traffic is summarized below in terms of the daily volume -to -capacity ratio for SR 111, west of Dune Palms Road: Existing Conditions Roadway Segment Volume Capacity V/C Ratio LOS SR 111(4 lanes) 27,138 35,900 0.76 C Opening Year Conditions With Project With One Driveway Roadway Segment Volume SR 111 west of project driveway 40,300 SR 111 east of project driveway 40,300 Capacity V/C Ratio LOS 53,900 0.75 C 53,900 0.75 C 093 I:] OPENING YEAR WITH AND DAILY TRAFFIC LEGEND: 361/676 = AM/PM 48.8 = AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (VEHICLES IN 1000-5) EXHIBIT PROJECT PEAK HOUR WITH ONE DRIVEWAY 38f 094 M URBAN La QUINTA AUTO MALL, La Quinta, California - 00585:10 cwosswo•os 19 OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT AND DAILY TRAFFIC WITH TWO 40.3 gr 60/157/1750 C cc N Z W V M LA 40 L-45/58 co T- a —860/1218 �fi L f-80/37 40/104-J -1 t f- 691/1351 N co o 89/31-� \ M O en 38.6 60/157/1750---� 0 0 N P'1 en rn 0 01 SITE LEGEND: 361/676 - AM/PM 48.8 - AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (VEHICLES IN 1000-S) 40.3 EXHIBIT J PEAK HOUR DRIVEWAYS u9 La QUINTA AUTO MALL, La Quinta, California-00585:09 IJRBAI caosBA II 20 Opening Year Conditions With Project With Two Driveways Roadwav Segment Volume SR 111 west of project driveways 40,300 SR 111 between project driveways 38,600 SR 111 east of project driveways 40,300 Capacity V/C Ratio LOS 53,900 0.75 C 53,900 0.72 C 53,900 0.75 C The daily traffic analysis presented above indicates that the segments along Highway 111 will remain within the LOS "C" capacity range. Additionally, to evaluate actual peak hour operating characteristics, the downstream intersection of Dune Palms Road has been analyzed. INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS The intersection traffic analysis at the intersection of Dune Palms Road and SR 111 for Opening Year (2003) conditions with the proposed project are presented in Table 4. As in indicated in Table 4, this intersection is anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS "C") during the peak hours. Therefore, based on the peaK nour analysis, it is anticipated that the future infrastructure will accommodate the future peak hour forecasts in this area. ACCESS RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the daily and peak hour traffic analysis presented above, it can be concluded that the capacity conditions with a single or dual driveway configuration would be similar for project buildout conditions. The proposed distances between the two project driveways along Highway 111 will be less than the recommended spacing requested by Caltrans (600 feet between intersections). The proximity of the easterly driveway to Dune Palms Road will require traffic leaving this driveway and desiring to turn left at Dune Palms Road to weave across three lanes of traffic to enter the left turn pocket. Therefore, Urban Crossroads, Inc. recommends that a stop sign, stop bar, and stop legend be provided at this 3 21 TABLE 4 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES' DELAY2 LEVEL OF NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- TRAFFIC BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND (SECS.) SERVICE L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM INTERSECTION CONTROL' Dune Palms Rd. (NS) at: • SR - 111 (EW) TS 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 26.0 1 21.6 C C When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right 2 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software: Traffix, Version 7.1.0607 (1999). Per the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. 3 TS = Traffic Signal U:\UcJobs\00585\ExceA[00585-02.xls]T 4 38 t1i97 22 driveway to ensure that a driver comes to a complete stop prior to entering the flow of traffic on Highway 111. Furthermore, it should be noted that other egress opportunities are available (e.g. the westerly driveway and La Quinta Center Drive) that would provide additional weaving distance. It is recommended that a right turn lane be provided at both driveway locations along Highway 111. In reviewing the inbound traffic to the site for a single versus dual driveway configuration, a significantly longer right turn lane would be required to service the traffic volumes with only a single driveway. The second driveway configuration allows traffic to distribute to another location, thereby decreasing the traffic intensity at a single point. The length of the driveways should be a minimum of 150 feet with a 90- foot transition. INTERNAL CIRCULATION EVALUATION Urban Crossroads, Inc. has reviewed the access to the proposed gas station in terms of .potential queuing into La Quinta Drive and the internal drive aisles. Based on the location of the gas station within the pad, it is not anticipated to attract as much pass -by traffic in comparison to a location in closer proximity to Highway 111. Furthermore, vehicles accessing the site will turn right off of the internal drive aisle without experiencing delay due to conflicting traffic (i.e. a left turn movement could experience potential queuing if the opposing flow of traffic occurs at a continuous rate). Based on these considerations, it is not anticipated that vehicles will queue into either the internal drive aisle or onto La Quinta Drive. Although a queuing problem is not anticipated for the proposed gas station, the following recommendations are provided: • A truck turning template illustrating the swept path should be provided to indicate that the tankers will be able to maneuver within the site. 38 23 098 The access to the future development to the north of the gas station should be eliminated or designed to only allow vehicles to exit onto the internal drive aisle. • It is recommended that the southerly drive aisle be directly aligned across from Auto Centre Way South to prevent driver confusion and reduce vehicular conflicts. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Based on our review of the proposed land use changes, and the completion of updated trip generation rates, trip distribution patterns, and the proposed internal circulation plan and review of the prior EIR's, Urban Crossroads, Inc. anticipates that there would be no new or more severe traffic impacts caused by the project than those previously disclosed and mitigated in the two prior EIR's for the Centre at La Quinta. If you have any questions regarding the analysis presented above, please do not hesitate to call at (949) 660-1994. Respectfully subm Scott Sato, P.E. Senior Associate SS:jt 00585-05 Attachments pFESS/p� OTT T S,9 FyG� INC. o m No. C 90277. Exp. ,, C 1 V %%- a�P 'eOF CAL�F�� (� 9 3 24 APPENDIX EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS 100 Location:SR-111 btwn. Dune PAL as Rd. & La Quint U Quint Volumes for Wed. M.,il 08650W1 AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB 12:00-12:15 18 12 12:00-12:15 163 229 12:15-12:30 21 14 12:15-12:30 178 203 12:30-12:45 16 11 12:30-12:45 210 193 12:45-1:00 9 64 2 39 103 12:45-1:00 193 744 207 832 1576 1:00-1:15 22 8 1:00-1:15 189 157 1:15-1:30 7 3 1:15-1:30 239 183 1:30-1:45 10 5 1:30-1:45 217 172 1:45-2:00 4 43 6 22 65 1:45-2:00 180 825 181 693 1518 2:00-2:15 6 4 2:00-2:15 168 168 2:15-2:30 6 8 2:15-2:30 224 193 2:30-2:45 - 0 1 2:30-2:45 206 190 2:45-3:00 6 18 8 21 39 2:45-3:00 244 842 180 731 1573 3:00-3:15 2 5 3:00-3:15 238 196 3:15-3:30 4 0 3:15-3:30 202 212 3:30-3:45 6 6 3:30-3:45 193 156 3:454:00 3 15 2 13 28 3:454:00 182 815 187 751 1566 4:004:15 7 5 4:00-4:15 308 189 4:154:30 9 16 4:154:30 288 190 4:30-4:45 8 26 4:30-4:45 274 169 4:45-5:00 17 41 40 87 128 4:45-5:00 196 1066 155 703 1769 5:00-5:15 16 36 5:00-5:15 289 290 5:15-5:30 13 47 5:15-5:30 285 278 5:30-5:45 23 90 5:30-5:45 171 280 5:45-6:00 39 91 118 291 382 5:45-6:00 284 1029 254 1102 2131 6:00-6:15 39 81 6:00-6:15 141 251 6:15-6:30 57 97 6:15-6:30 155 259 6:30-6:45 52 118 6:30-6:45 166 242 6:45-7:00 76 224 139 435 659 6:45-7:00 127 589 240 992 1581 7:00-7:15 123 86 7:00-7:15 161 133 7:15-7:30 96 93 7:15-7:30 142 117 7:30-7:45 95 134 7:30-7:45 161 137 7:45-8:00 140 454 147 460 914 7:45-8:00 123 587 116 503 1090 8:00-8:15 141 104 8:00-8:15 114 110 8:15-8:30 129 115 8:15-8:30 112 92 8:30-8:45 142 129 8:30-8:45 97 106 8:45-9:00 141 553 135 483 1036 8:45-9:00 101 424 108 416 840 9:00-9:15 96 137 9:00-9:15 107 95 9:15-9:30 132 132 9:15-9:30 89 74 9:30-9:45 132 165 9:30-9:45 94 84 9:45-10:00 146 506 160 594 1100 9:45-10:00 56 346 71 324 670 10:00-10:15 146 163 10:00-10:15 75 60 10:15-10:30 169 161 10:15-10:30 57 48 10:30-10:45 138 200 10:30-10:45 49 38 10:45-11:00 186 639 192 716 1355 10:45-11:00 43 224 47 193 417 11:00-11:15 170 188 11:00-11:15 49 35 11:15-11:30 174 187 11:15-11:30 32 22 11:30-11:45 151 191 11:30-11:45 26 26 11:45-12:00 200 695 213 779 1474 11:45-12:00 24 131 16 99 230 Total Vol 3343 3940 7283 7622 7339 14961 Daily Totals 10965 11279 22244 3'-� JIM N-S STREET: E-W STREET: SOUTHLAND CAR COUNTERS VEHICLE AND MANUAL COUNTS DUNE PALMS RD. DATE: 8/22/2001 CITY: LA QUINTA SR-111 DAY: WEDNESDAY Intersection I.D.: PROJECT# 0864001 A NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND RECEIVING: X X X X NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 5 10 7 8 13 3 3 64 11 7' 106 5 242 7:15 AM 6 24 4 11 24 4 0 81 15 16 106 8 299 7:30 AM 8 24 6 6 33 4 4 86 18 17 137 9 352 7:45 AM 5 10 11 10 27 4 1 103 19 13 113 10 326 8:00 AM 7 25 5 8 32 2 3 124 14 13 137 4 374 8:15 AM 4 12 4 10 11 3 5 111 12 13 134 9 328 8:30 AM 4 15 5 9 17 3 2 111 8 6 121 11 312 8:45 AM 5 13 6 8 20 2 4 108 11 1 135 6 319 9:00 AM 9: 15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 44 133 48 70 177 25 22 788 108 86 989 62 2552 AM Peak Hr Begins at 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 24 71 26 34 103 13 13 424 63 56 521 32 1380 ADDITIONS: SIGNALIZED 3 31 SOUTHLAND CAR COUNTERS VEHICLE AND MANUAL COUNTS N-S STREET: DUNE PALMS RD. DATE: 8/22/2001 CITY: LA QUINTA E-W STREET: S R-111 DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 0864001 P NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 17 24 19 16 9 4 2 171 4 10 167 8 451 4:15 PM 8 9 14 6 10 5 5 186 7 6 158 7 421 4:30 PM 6 22 8 4 11 3 0 177 5 5 141 11 393 4:45 PM 7 14 8 12 8 2 7 181 6 5 170 15 435 5:00 PM 2 7 5 7 6 6 6 176 8 8 141 17 389 5:15 PM 2 15 4 5 8 6 5 194 6 5 194 10 454 5:30 PM 5 10 5 7 10 8 11 177 6 3 154 11 407 5:45 PM 4 13 7 4 7 5 6 173 3 5 162 8 397 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL NL VOLUMES = 51 114 70 61 69 39 42 1435 45 47 1287 87 3347 PM Peak Hr Begins at 400 PM PEAK VOLUMES = 38 69 49 38 38 14 14 715 22 26 636 41 1700 ADDITIONS: SIGNALIZED 17 �s 103 AUG-20-2001 10:5b "UM:t'Ut:L1 UK&=) rod- r r r - f 1» TRAFFIC COUNTS STREET I.D. SEGMENT COUNT YEAR SEASON Fred Wart Fred Wars Fred Waring, Fred Warm Fred Warin Hwy. 111 111 H , 111 H , 111 H . 111 Hwy. 111 lHwy. 111 . 111 Hwy. 111 H . 111 Hwy. 111 Hwy. 111 Hwy. 111 Jefferson Jefferson Jefferson Jefferson Jefferson Jeffemon Jefferson Jefferson Jefferson Jefferson JeHempn Jefferson F-2 F-2 F-2 F-2 F-2 H-1 H-1 H-1 H-1 H-1 H-2 1-1-2 H-2 M-2 H-4 H-4 H-5 H-5 J-1 J-1 J-2 J-2 J-2 J-2 J•2 J-2 J-2 J-2 J-3 J-3 E/0 Washington E/O Washington E/O Washington E/O Washington E/O Washing2n E/O Miles E/O Mlles W/0 Washl tort W/0 Washington W/O Washi on E/O Washinoon E/O Washington E/O Washington FJO Wash ton W/O Jefferson W/O Jefferson E/O Jefferson E/O Jefferson N/O Fred Waring N/0 Fred Waring5,500 S/0 Fred Waring15,622 S/0 Fred Warm S/0 Fred Waring11,222 S/O Fred Warm S/0 Fred Warts S/O Fred Wart S/0 Fred Wert S/0 Fred Wert S/O Mlles 510 Miles 12,620 5,122 10,981 7,528 17,498 34,688 31,076 31,681 31 786 18,100 25,11t3 23.272 7, 25.501 25.300 20.468 18,500 24,331 18,500 6,530 13,584 12,910 9,506 11,002 10,793 6,512 10,803 10,038 9,252 8 320 7,371 6.354 7,224 11187 9,825 9,252 7,371 13882 , 11,65�4 13, 786 1374T , 14,887 12698 , 11,681 12.711 9,959 9,078' l3 608 8.878 9,324 8,854 1992nter 1981 1990 1986 INS 2000 1999 1997 1990 1988 2000 1999 1998 1997 1990 1908 1990 1988 1991 1990 2000 1999 lose 1997 1995 1A94 1993 1992 1997 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 2000 1999 1994 1892 2000 1989 1998 1991 1995 1994 1992 1991 2000 1998 1 997 1995 1994 Wi Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Witor Winton Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Spring Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter S S Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter 1 C 4 osto4mw 390 Jefferson J-3 S/0 Miles jeffeeson Jefferson Jefferson Jefferson J-3 J-3 J-3 J-3 .1•-4 S/0 Miles S/0 Mlles S/0 Miles S/0 Miles N/O .111 Jefferson Jefferson J-4 NIO .111 N/0 .111 Jefferson J-4 Jefferson Jefferson J� J-5 WO . 111 SIO - 111 Jefferson J-5 S/O .111 S/0 H . 111 S/O .111 SIO , 111 S/O 111 S/0 .111 S/0 .111 S/O Ave. 50 S/O Ave. 50 S/0 Ave. 50 S/0 Ave. 50 S/O Ave. 50 S/O Ave. 50 Jefferson Jefferson J-5 J-5 Jefferson J-5 Jefferson J-5 Jefferson Jefferson Jefferson Jefferson Jefferson Jefferson off Pmon Jefferson J-5 J-5 J-7 J-7 J-7 J-7 J-7 J-T TrIft Counts PmgA 2 APPENDIX B HCM CALCULATIONS 39,j 105 MITIG8 - Default Scenario Thu Sep 6, 2001 11:59:36 Page 1-1 La Quinta Auto Mall Access Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Dune Palms Road (N/S) / SR 111 (E/W) t*,t*********t******,c*,r***:*t*t*****t**::i****t**t******t**t*******,t*,►t*,tt**t*t*♦ Cycle (sec): 0 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.348 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 27.8 Optimal Cycle: 67 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------� Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 20 20 10 20 20 10 15 15 10 15 15 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 24 71 26 34 103 13 13 424 63 56 521 32 Growth Adj: 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 1,22 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 Initial Bse: 29_ 87 32 41 126 16 16 517 77 68 636 39 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 29 87 32 41 126 16 16 517 77 68 636 39 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 29 87 32 41 126 16 16 517 77 68 636 39 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 29 87 32 41 126 16 16 517 77 68 636 39 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 29 87 32 41 126 16 16 517 77 68 636 39 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.11 1.00 1.74 0.26 1.00 1.88 0.12 Final Sat.: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1686 214 1900 3142 468 1900 3401 209 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.16 0.16 0.04 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Volume/Cap: 0.10 0.15 0.06 0.14 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.73 0.73 0.24 0.84 0.84 Delay/Veh: 24.8 17.4 16.8 25.0 18.0 18.0 24.5 27.7 27.7 25.6 32.4 32.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 24.8 17.4 16.8 25.0 18.0 18.0 24.5 27.7 27.7 25.6 32.4 32.4 DesignQueue: 1 2 1 1 3 0 1 16 2 2 19 1 *,t**#,t*,t,tt**t**,t*,t**,t***,t**,t****,t�*t,tf:ti,e********,t****:***!t********�r,tt*,►******* Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 3"07 10 7 GV�-oJL-- FLU MITIGB - Default Scenario Thu Sep 6, 2001 12:09:57 Page 1-1 La Quinta Auto Mall Access Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Dune Palms Road (N/S) / SR 111 (E/W) *t#tt!!tYlYY!*tt#t#*t!##!*#*#!!#t*#t!**#t#*YY!*#YYYt##Y!#!!###!#t#!!!*tttt##t#!# Cycle (sec): 75 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.398 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.9 Optimal Cycle: 75 Level Of Service: C !#*t#!tt**#Y*##**###YlYY!#########**##Y#tYY##*###!*##YY#!!tY*!#######!#!#t###Y!# Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------� Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 20 20 10 20 20 10 15 15 10 15 15 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 38 69 49 38 38 14 14 715 22 26 636 41 Growth Adj: 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 Initial Bse: 46 84 60 46 46 17 17 872 27 32 776 50 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 46 84 60 46 46 17 17 872 27 32 776 50 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 46 84 60 46 46 17 17 872 27 32 776 50 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 46 84 60 46 46 17 17 872 27 32 776 50 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 46 84 60 46 46 17 17 872 27 32 776 50 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.73 0.27 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.88 0.12 Final Sat.: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1387 513 1900 3502 108 1900 3391 219 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.02 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves' **** **** *Y** Y#tY Green Time: 10.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 23..0 23.0 10.0 23.0 23.0 Volume/Cap: 0.18 0.17 0.12 0.18 0.12 0.12 0.07 0.81 0.81 0.13 0.75 0.75 Delay/Veh: 29.2 21.3 20.9 29.2 21.0 21.0 28.5 28.7 28.7 28.9 26.2 26.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 29.2 21.3 20.9 29.2 21.0 21.0 28.5 28.7 28.7 28.9 26.2 26.2 DesignQueue: 2 3 2 2 1 1 1 27 1 1 24 2 ###**Y!###!t#ttt###!###*#Y##*t#t####t###Y##**#*Y!4##*#!!YY######*Yt####!f###!##! Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 33,E 1C�8 MITIG8 - Default Scenario Tue Feb 12, 2002 19:22:13 Page 1-1 La Quinta Auto Mall Access Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Dune Palms Road (N/S) / SR 111 (E/W) Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.351 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.0 Optimal Cycle: 120 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------� Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 20 20 10 20 20 10 15 15 10 15 15 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 24 71 26 34 103 13 13 424 63 56 521 32 Growth Adj: 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 Initial Bse: 34 101 37 48 146 18 18 602 89 80 740 45 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 30 22 89 0 0 120 0 Initial Fut: 34 101 37 48 146 48 40 691 89 80 860 45 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 34 101 37 48 146 48 40 691 89 80 860 45 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 34 101 37 48 146 48 40 691 89 80 860 45 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 34 101 37 48 146 48 40 691 89 80 860 45 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- --------------- II---------------� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.25 1.00 2.66 0.34 1.00 2.85 0.15 Final Sat.: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1430 470 1900 4595 592 1900 4929 258 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.03 0.10 0.10 0.02 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 10.0 28.3 28.3 14.2 32.5 32.5 10.0 55.5 55.5 10.0 55.5 55.5 Volume/Cap: 0.21 0.23 0.08 0.21 0.38 0.38 0.25 0.33 0.33 0.51 0.38 0.38 Delay/Veh: 52.0 37.2 35.8 48.4 36.0 36.0 52.3 20.5 20.5 55.3 21.1 21.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 52.0 37.2 35.8 48.4 36.0 36.0 52.3 20.5 20.5 55.3 21.1 21.1 DesignQueue: 2 5 2 3 7 2 2 26 3 5 32 2 Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 3Q'l 1C13 MITIG8 - Default Scenario Tue Feb 12, 2002 19:22:58 Page 1-1 La Quinta Auto Mall Access Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1997 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Dune Palms Road (N/S) / SR 111 (E/W) Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.439 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 21.6 Optimal Cycle: 120 Level Of Service: C+ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------� Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 20 20 10 20 20 10 15 15 10 15 15 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 38 69 49 38 38 14 14 715 22 26 636 41 Growth Adj: 1.42 1,42 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 Initial Bse: 54 98 70 54 54 20 20 1015 31 37 903 58 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 79 84 336 0 0 315 0 Initial Fut: 54 98 70 54 54 99 104 1351 31 37 1218 58 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 54 98 70 54 54 99 104 1351 31 37 1218 58 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 54 98 70 54 54 99 104 1351 31 37 1218 58 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 54 98 70 54 54 99 104 1351 31 37 1218 58 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.35 0.65 1.00 2.93 0.07 1.00 2.86 0.14 Final Sat.: 1900 1900 1900 1900 671 1229 1900 5071 116 1900 4951 236 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.27 0.27 0.02 0.25 0.25 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 10.0 20.3 20.3 10.1 20.4 20.4 10.0 67.6 '67.6 10.0 67.6 67.6 Volume/Cap: 0.34 0.31 0.22 0.34 0.47 0.47 0.66 0.47 0.47 0.23 0.44 0.44 Delay/Veh: 53.2 44.2 43.4 53.0 46.0 46.0 63.0 15.7 15.7 52.2 15.3 15.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 53.2 44.2 43.4 53.0 46.0 46.0 63.0 15.7 15.7 52.2 15.3 15.3 DesignQueue: 3 6 4 3 3 6 6 42 1 2 38 2 Traffix 7.5.1015 (c) 2000 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE rj 110 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING A PLANT NURSERY/GARDEN CENTER, AND AUTO REPAIR/SPECIALTY SHOP AND AN AUTO SERVICE STATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH RETAIL BUILDING "B" FOR THE CENTRE AT LA QUINTA SPECIFIC PLAN CASE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2002-067 APPLICANT: STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 26th day of February, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing request of the Stamko Development to consider the request for a plant nursery/garden center, and auto repair/specialty shop and an auto service station in conjunction with retail Building "B" within a retail shopping center having 334,117 ± square feet, which was approved by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution 2002-025, subject of conditions; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 19th day of March, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request of the Stamko Development Co. for the approval of a plant nursery/garden center, and auto repair/specialty shop and an auto service station in conjunction with retail Building "B" within a retail shopping center having 334,117 ± square feet, located along the south side of Highway 1 1 1 between La Quinta Centre Drive and 300 ± feet west of Dune Palms Road, more particularly described as: APNS 649-030-057, 058 WHEREAS, an Addendum to a previously certified Environmental Impact Report and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ("Addendum") for approval of a Site Development Permit for a retail shopping center having 334,117 ± square feet, a Conditional Use Permit for a plant nursery/garden center, an auto repair/specialty shop, and an auto service 18 numbered and two letter lots ranging in size from .47 to 19.44 acres for the 87-acre Specific Plan area was prepared; and WHEREAS, said Addendum has complied with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has determined that although the proposal could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects have been analyzed adequately in the earlier EIR and SEIR pursuant to applicable standards and have been avoided, or mitigated pursuant to the earlier EIR 401 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoCUP.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Conditional Use Permit 2002-067 Stamko Development Co. Adopted: March 19, 2002 and SEIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project and/or were made a part of the Addendum and/or included in the Conditions of Approval; WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering the EIR, the Supplemental EIR, the Addendum, all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts and reasons to justify approval of said Conditional Use Permit: 1 . The project is consistent with the General Plan in that these types of units are permitted in Regional Commercial Zone with a Conditional Use Permit. 2. This project has been designed to be consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Code and applicable Specific Plan with conditions regulating landscaping, hardscape, and maintenance. 3. An Addendum to the EIR, the Supplemental EIR has been prepared in compliance with CEQA. 4. The project design provides, or is condition to provide landscape and wall buffers along adjacent properties, site maintenance provisions, and the design of the physical appearances of the buildings will not impact the surrounding Regional Commercial Neighborhood. 5. The site design of the project is appropriate for the use in that the uses comply with applicable design requirements and are providing adequate landscaping and are compatible with surrounding development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit 2002-067 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution, subject to the Conditions labeled Exhibit "A", attached hereto; PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on the 19th day of March, 2002, by the following vote, to ,-j s� 4v� wit: ilz G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoCUP.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Conditional Use Permit 2002-067 Stamko Development Co. Adopted: March 19, 2002 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC/AAE City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 403 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoCUP.wpd 113 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2002-067 - RECOMMENDED STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 GENERAL 1. The approved Conditional Use Permit shall be used within five years of the effective date of approval, otherwise, it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. "Used" means the issuance of a building permit. A time extension may be requested as permitted in Municipal Code Section 9.200.080D. 2. The use of this site shall be in conformance with the approved exhibits contained in Conditional Use Permit 2002-067, Site Development Permit 2002- 728, and Specific Plan 97-029, unless otherwise amended by the following conditions. 3. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this development application or any application thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 4. The Applicant has indicated its belief that the Retail B Building will be occupied by Wal-Mart, which would relocate to Retail B from its existing building in La Quinta. Should this relocation occur, in order to ensure the re -occupancy of the existing Wal-Mart building and to avoid a situation in which vacant structures would remain along the Highway 1 1 1 business corridor, the following conditions shall apply: a. As a condition to relocating to the Retail B Building, Wall -Mart shall keep the landscape, hardscape, and building exterior at the existing Wal-Mart site well maintained. The physical condition of the structure, hardscape and landscaping shall be kept, at a minimum, at the level of condition that exists as of the date the Project is approved. In addition, nothing shall be done to the existing structure that would give the appearance that the building has been vacated. As an example, the windows may not be boarded. Any graffiti shall be removed within two business days. The site shall not be used for storage. 4 v , � z! 1.14 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoCUPCOA.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Conditional Use Permit 2002-067 Adopted: March 19, 2002 b. In order to ensure the full reoccupation of the existing Wal-Mart building by one or more commercial retail users within a reasonable time period (not to exceed 24 months) following any relocation of Wal-Mart from the existing building and into the Retail B Building, the following additional condition is imposed upon the Project. Within 90 days of approval of this Project, and prior to issuance of a building permit for Retail B Building, the City and Wal-Mart shall execute either (i) an option agreement satisfactory to the City which provides the City the option of purchasing the approximately 13 acre Wal-Mart property in the City of La Quinta, both the existing Wal-Mart building and all surrounding parking lot areas owned by Wal-Mart (the "Existing Building"), or (ii) at the City's option, shall execute other agreements satisfactory to the City that ensure that the Existing Building will be fully reoccupied by one or more commercial retail users within a reasonable time period, as defined above. The agreement referenced in (i) or (ii) shall be referred to hereinafter as the "Agreement". If the City and Wal-Mart fail to execute the Agreement within 90 days of Project approval, Stamko Development's entitlement approvals shall remain effective for Retail B Building -- and this condition of approval shall be deemed satisfied by the City -- so long as Retail B Building at The Centre at La Quinta is not occupied by Wal-Mart. The City and Wal-Mart may extend this 90 day period, if agreed to in writing, up to 150 days, but in no event will a building permit issue if the Agreement has not been executed. Any extensions agreed to beyond 150 days shall require Stamko Development's prior written approval. This condition of approval applies to Retail B Building only, and will have no application to the issuance of building permits for any other development in Planning Area III of The Centre of La Quinta Specific Plan. 4M�J v G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoCUPCOA.wpd 11� RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SHOP BUILDINGS, BUILDING "A", BUILDING "B", AND SERVICE STATION FOR THE CENTRE AT LA QUINTA SPECIFIC PLAN CASE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 APPLICANT: STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 26th day of February, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of the Stamko Development Co. for the approval of a Site Development Permit for a retail shopping center having 334,117 ± square feet, which was approved by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution 2002-026, subject of conditions; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 19th day of March, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of the Stamko Development Co. for the approval of a Site Development Permit for a retail shopping center having 334,117 ± square feet, located along the south side of Highway 1 1 1 between La Quinta Centre Drive and 300 ± feet west of Dune Palms Road, more particularly described as: APNS 649-030-057 and 058 WHEREAS, an Addendum to a previously certified Environmental Impact Report and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ("Addendum") for approval of a Site Development Permit for a retail shopping center having 334,117 ± square, feet, a Conditional Use Permit for a plant nursery/garden center, an auto repair/specialty shop, and an auto service 18 numbered and two letter lots ranging in size from .47 to 19.44 acres for the 87-acre Specific Plan area was prepared; and WHEREAS, said Addendum has complied with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects have been analyzed adequately in the earlier EIR and SEIR pursuant to applicable standards and have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to the earlier EIR and SEIR, including revisions, or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project and/or were made a part of the Addendum and/or included in the Conditions of Approval; and, G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDP.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Site Development Permit 2002-728 Stamko Development Co. Adopted: March 19, 2002 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering the EIR and Supplemental EIR, the Addendum, all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following facts and reasons to justify approval of said Site Development Permit: 1 . The project is consistent with the General Plan in that the property proposed for the commercial project is designated as Regional Commercial. 2. This project has been designed to be consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Code, Specific Plan. 3. An Addendum to the EIR, the Supplemental EIR has been prepared in compliance with CEQA. 4. The architectural elevations have been reviewed for compatibility with the surrounding existing uses and contain similar roof elements, entry statements, coloration, and comply with the existing Specific Plan design theme. 5. The site. design of the project, including, but not limited to project entries, interior circulation, pedestrian and bicycle access, pedestrian amenities, screening of equipment and trash enclosures, exterior lighting, and other site design elements are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the City in that the design as conditioned has addressed these issues. 6. Project landscaping, including, but not limited to the location, type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials has been designed so as to provide relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses and between development and open space, provide an overall unifying influence, enhance the visual continuity of the project, and complement the surrounding project area, ensuring lower maintenance and water use. The landscaping has been designed to be compatible with the surrounding area, complement the proposed improvements and provide required shading of the parking area. 7. The project sign program was not approved with this application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 4�1 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDP.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Site Development Permit 2002-728 Stamko Development Co. Adopted: March 19, 2002 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve Site Development Permit 2002-728 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution, subject to the Conditions labeled Exhibit "A", attached hereto; PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on the 19th day of March, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC/AAE City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 4ti�v G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDP.wpd CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the developer of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Prior to the issuance of any permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary permits and/or clearances from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) Imperial Irrigation District (IID) California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) • SunLine Transit Agency The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting the improvement plans for City approval. 3. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Chapter 8.70 (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Quality Resources Control Board's ("SWQRCB9 Order No. 99-08-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs five (5) acres or more of land, or that disturbs less than five (5) acres of land, but which is a part of a construction project that 4 0 3 11.3 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 1 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 encompasses more than five (5) acres of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this Site Development Permit. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practice ("BMPs"), 8.70.020 (Definitions), LQMC: 1. Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2. Temporary Sediment Control. 3. Wind Erosion Control. 4. Tracking Control. 5. Non -Storm Water Management. 7. Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All of applicant's erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off site grading being done in relation to this project. F. All approved project BMPs shall be maintained in their proper working order throughout the course of construction, and until all improvements have been accepted by the City. 4. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). PROPERTY RIGHTS 5. Prior to the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire, or confer, those easements, and other property rights necessary for the construction and/or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services, and for the maintenance, construction and reconstructior410 of essential improvements. n G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 2 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 6. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 7. Unless the ultimate developed right-of-way can be documented, the public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1. State Route 1 1 1 (S.R. 1 1 1) - (Major Arterial) - 70 foot half right of way or additional right of way if required by Caltrans for the design of the approved construction and access plans for this parcel map. If required by Caltrans, acquire and deed additional right of way as necessary for widening of the median and resulting northward shift of the north side of the highway. 2. La Quinta Centre Drive - (Collector Street) - 60 feet of right of way as required by the approved Specific Plan No. 97-029. 8. Right-of-way geometry for property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawing #805, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 9. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans and as may be required by Caltrans and SunLine Transit Agency. 10. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public right-of- ways as follows: A. S.R. 1 1 1 - Fifty (50) Feet from the R/W-P/L. B. Interior Public Streets - As required by the General Plan and City Code unless otherwise approved in the Specific Plan No. 97-029 for this development. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. 41 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes. 11. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas shown on the Site Development Permit. 12. The applicant shall vacate all abutter's right -of -access to public streets and properties from all frontages along such public streets and properties, excepting those access points shown on the. Site Development Permit. 13. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, ingress/egress, or other encroachments will occur. 14. When an applicant proposes the vacation, or abandonment, any existing right-of- way, or access easement, which will diminish the access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall provide an alternate right-of-way or access easement, to those properties, or shall submit notarized letters of consent from the affected property owners. 15. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of this Site Development Permit and the date of final acceptance of the on and off -site improvements for this Site Development Permit, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these conditions of approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 16. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans), LQMC. 17. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below 1 shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 4 v 122 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. Public Street Plans: 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical The street improvement plans shall include permanent traffic control and separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. B. State Route 1 1 1: As Required by Caltrans, including metric or dual units if required. C. Off -Site Street Median Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' D. Perimeter Landscape Plan: 1 it = 20' E. On -Site Rough Grading Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal F. On -Site Precise Grading Plan: 1" = 30' Horizontal G. On -Site Utility Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal H. On -Site Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. In addition to the normal set of improvement plans, a "Site Development" plan V and a Site Utility"Ian are required to be submitted for approval b the Building 4 1 P q PP Y 9 Official and the City Engineer. 123 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 5 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 "Site Development" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements. "Site Utility" plans shall normally include all sub -surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to sewer lines, water lines, fire protection and storm drainage systems. The "Site Utility" plan shall have signature blocks for the Building Official and the City Engineer. 18. The City maintains standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City resolution, the applicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes from the City. 19. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all complete, approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format which can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 20. Prior to the conditional approval of this Site Development Permit, or the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall construct all off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Off - Site Improvement Agreement ("OSIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 21. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monuments. 414 124 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 6 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 22. When improvements are to be secured through an OSIA, and prior to any permits being issued by the City, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed off -site improvements for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution, or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit costs shall be approved by the City Engineer. At the same time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for the security determination of the OSIA, the applicant shall also submit one copy of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " reduction of the Site Development Plan, along with one copy of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " Vicinity Map. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates for its own on and off -site improvements. Cost estimates for the security of telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements will not be required. 23. When improvements are phased through an administrative approval (e.g., Phasing Plan, Site Development Permits, etc.), all off -site improvements and common on - site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured through an SIA, prior to the occupancy of any permanent buildings in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured through an SIA, prior to the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The same submittal criteria shall apply to all subsequent phases as required for the first phase submittal. (E.g. detailed cost estimates, 8-1 /2" x 11 " reductions, etc.) 24. In the event the applicant fails to construct improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, or other phasing method, the City shall have the 41 'J In 41 J G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 7 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 25. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 26. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 27. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, and C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16 (Fugitive Dust Control), LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions submitted with its application for a grading permit. 28. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 29. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot from the building pads in adjacent developments. 30. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. 41 (:J 126 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 8 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 Building pad elevations on contiguous interior lots shall not differ by more than three feet except for lots that do not share a common street frontage, where the differential shall not exceed five feet. Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 31. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus three tenths of a foot from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Parcel Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Staff for a substantial conformance finding review. 32. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 33. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), LQMC, Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. The design storm shall be either the 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 34. Stormwater shall normally be retained in common retention basin(s) as shown on the Tentative Parcel Map. Individual lot basins or other retention concepts may be approved by the City Engineer for lots 2 Y2 acres in size or larger or where the use of common retention is determined by the City Engineer to be impracticable. If individual lot retention is approved, the applicant shall meet all individual lot retention provisions of Chapter 13.24, LQMC. 4 1 of 127 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 9 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 35. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise. 36. Nuisance water shall be retained on site by an approved system. 37. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 38. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 39. For on -site common retention basins, retention depth shall not exceed six feet and side slopes shall not exceed 3:1. For retention basins on individual lots, retention depth shall not exceed two feet. 40. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots along State Route 111. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of- way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to Section 9.100.040(B)(7), LQMC. 41. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries, levels or frequencies in any area outside the development. 42. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 43. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. UTILITIES 44. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.1 10 (Utilities), 13 LQMC. 128 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 10 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 45. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 46. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 47. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 48. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access For Individual Properties And Development), LQMC for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 49. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 50. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1. S.R. 1 1 1 from the east side of La Quinta Centre Drive to the easterly project boundary (Major Arterial) - Construct applicant's half of a 116 413, 129 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 11 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 foot (curb face to curb face) street improvements. Construct a 28 foot wide raised landscaped median, and widen the north half as required for the widened section. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. Other significant new improvements required for installation in, or adjacent, to the subject right of way include: (a) 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk. (b) 28-foot wide landscaped median. (Developer is required to pay for 50% of the landscape median improvements at their own expense pursuant to Specific Plan 97- 029. The remaining 50% of the landscape median improvements will be reimbursed from the City's Development Impact Fee fund in accordance with policies established for that program.) (c) Main entry streets, bus turnouts, acceleration/deceleration lanes, and/or other features contained in the approved construction plans may warrant additional street widths or other measures as determined by the City Engineer, Caltrans or SunLine Transit Agency. B. LA QUINTA CENTRE DRIVE 1. Construct 40 foot curb to curb full width improvements as shown on the Tentative Map and approved in Specific Plan No.97-029. 51. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential 3.0" a.c./4.50" c.a.b. Collector 4.011/5.0011 Secondary Arterial 4.011/6.0011 4 0 Primary Arterial 4.511/6.0011 Major Arterial 5.511/6.50" 130 or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 12 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 52. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 53. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 54. Standard knuckles and corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 55. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements. PARKING LOTS and ACCESS POINTS 56. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 (Parking). Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 57. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Primary Entry (La Quinta Centre Drive at Highway 1 1 1): Existing signalized intersection with full turning movements. B. Secondary Entry (Highway 1 1 1 between La Quinta Centre Drive and the easterly project boundary): 1. Approximately 300' easterly of La Quinta Centre Drive: Right in only driveway. This access shall be designed and constructed to have a 20-foot wide access with appropriate signage. 42 1.31. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 13 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 2. Approximately 600' easterly of La Quinta Centre Drive: Right in/right out driveway. The proposed driveway(s) on S.R. 1 1 1 shall require Caltrans approval. C. Secondary Entry (La Quinta Centre Drive/Auto Centre Drive Intersection): Driveway entrance with full turning movements. D. Secondary Entry (La Quinta Centre Drive northerly of Auto Centre Way South): Driveway entrance with full turning movements. E. Secondary Entry (At the Southerly Terminus of La Quanta Centre Drive): La Quinta Centre Drive will terminate with ingress and egress into Parcel No. 1. 58. Pursuant to Section 9.150.080(A)(8)(b) (Parking), LQMC, the applicant shall provide 90-foot uninterrupted driveway throats into the parking lot, or alternatively provide a combination of a dedicated right turn deceleration lane and the drive throat that will equal a total of 90-feet. CONSTRUCTION 59. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 60. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential tracts are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the tract or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. 4 �, G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 14 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 LANDSCAPING 61. The applicant shall comply with Sections 9.90.040 (Table of Development Standards) & 9.100.040 (Landscaping), LQMC. 62. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. 63. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit final plans for approval by the Community Development Department after Planning Commission review and action prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking is complete, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner prior to submitting for signature by the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 64. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 18 inches of curbs long public streets. 65. The final landscape plan shall include an enhanced landscape entry statement at the intersection of Auto Centre Drive and La Quinta Centre Drive. The enhancements are for the access lane east of La Quinta Centre Drive only. 66. The final landscape plans shall be reviewed by the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee and the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any permit for the construction of the parking lot. The review by the Planning Commission will be conducted as a business item. 67. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter and interior landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. A. For the Retail Building "B" site, a $25,000 bond or letter of credit in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, shall be posted prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Retail Building "B". The bond or letter of credit shall initially remain in effect for a period of five years. During that ;? G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 15 1 3 3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 period, if the City determines that the landscaping is not being properly maintained, it shall provide notice, at the addresses to be provided by the applicant or owner, of the need to correct the specific deficiencies. If the deficiencies in the landscaping are not corrected within 30 days of the mailing of the notice, the City shall have the right to call the bond or letter of credit, and the proceeds shall be utilized to the extent needed to correct the landscaping deficiencies. If, after five years, the landscaping has been properly maintained, the City shall release the bond or letter of credit. If, in the determination of the Community Development Director, the landscaping has not been properly maintained, the bond or letter of credit shall be renewed and maintained for an additional five year period. B. For the entire Planning Area III, the landscaping and irrigation system shall be well maintained and any dead plant material shall be promptly replaced. If the landscaping is not properly maintained, and if the condition is not cured within 30 days of the notice of the deficiencies, the City shall have the right to cause the correction of the deficiencies in the landscaping, and the applicant/owner agrees that the costs of the correction shall be recorded as a lien against the property. This remedy shall be in addition to any other remedies the City has by law. QUALITY ASSURANCE 68. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 69. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such err other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 70. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. After tributary -area improvements are complete and soils have been permanently stabilized where retention basins have been constructed, testing shall include sand filter percolation tests, as approved by the City Engineer. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 16 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 71. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all public improvement plans which were signed by the City Engineer. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City to reflect the as - built conditions. MAINTENANCE 72. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter and interior landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. 73. The applicant shall maintain the required public improvements until expressly released from this responsibility by the appropriate agency. FEES AND DEPOSITS 74. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. FIRE DEPARTMENT 75. Approved Super fire hydrants at every intersection and spaced every 330 feet along the street, and also they shall be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the buildings as measured along approved vehicular travel ways. 76. Blue retro-reflective pavement markers shall be placed in the street 8 inches from centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 77. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. 0 13� G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 17 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 78. City of La Quinta ordinance requires all commercial buildings 5,000 sq. ft. or larger to be fully sprinkled. NFPA 13 standard. Sprinkler plans will need to be submitted to the fire department for review. 79. Install Knox Key Lock box on each commercial building. Contact the fire department for an application. 80. Install portable fire extinguishers as required by the California Fire Code. 81. Minimum fire flow 2500 GPM, with an actual flow from any one hydrant connected to any given water main of 1500 GPM for 2-hours at 20 PSI reidual. 82. Building plans shall be submitted to the fire Department for plan review to run concurrent with the City plan check. 83. Any operation that produces grease -laden vapors will require a hood/duct system for fire protection. ( Restaurants, drive-thru's, etc.) 84. The applicant or developer shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designation required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/ or signs. SIGNS 85. All signs requested by the applicant are not approved. The applicant shall submit a new application for the sign program. The Planning Commission, as a business item, shall review the application and take action. MISCELLANEOUS 86. The Applicant has indicated its belief that the Retail B Building will be occupied by Walmart-Mart, which would relocate to Retail B from its existing building in La Quinta. Should this relocation occur, in order to ensure the re -occupancy of the existing Walmart-Mart building and to avoid a situation in which vacant structures would remain along the Highway 111 business corridor, the following conditions shall apply: A. As a condition to relocating to the Retail B Building, Walmartl-Mart shall keep the landscape, hardscape, and building exterior at the existing Walmart-Mart site well maintained. The physical condition of the structure, tip► hardscape and landscaping shall be kept, at a minimum, at the level of condition that exists as of the date the Project is approved. In additior�, ? tj G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 18 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 nothing shall be done to the existing structure that would give the appearance that the building has been vacated. As an example, the windows may not be boarded. Any graffiti shall be removed within two business days. The site shall not be used for storage. B. In order to ensure the full reoccupation of the existing Walmart-Mart building by one or more commercial retail users within a reasonable time period (not to exceed 24 months) following any relocation of Walmart-Mart from the existing building and into the Retail B Building, the following additional condition is imposed upon the Project. Within 90 days of approval of this Project, and prior to issuance of a building permit for Retail B Building, the City and Walmart-Mart shall execute either (i) an option agreement, satisfactory to the City which provides the City the option of purchasing the approximately 13 acre Walmart-Mart property in the City of La Quinta, both the existing Walmart-Mart building and all surrounding parking lot areas owned by Walmart-Mart (the "Existing Building"), or (ii) at the City's option, shall execute other agreements satisfactory to the City that ensure that the Existing Building will be fully reoccupied by one or more commercial retail users within a reasonable time period, as defined above. The agreement referenced in (i) or (ii) shall be referred to hereinafter as the "Agreement". If the City and Walmart-Mart fail to execute the Agreement within 90 days of Project approval, Stamko Development's entitlement approvals shall remain effective for Retail B Building -- and this condition of approval shall be deemed satisfied by the City -- so long as Retail B Building at The Centre at La Quinta is not occupied by Walmartmart. The City and Walmartmart may extend this 90 day period, if agreed to in writing, up to 150 days, but in no event will a building permit issue if the Agreement has not been executed. Any extensions agreed to beyond 150 days shall require Stamko Development's prior written approval. This condition of approval applies to Retail "B" Building only, and will have no application to the issuance of building permits for any other development in Planning Area III of The Centre of La Quinta Specific Plan. NOISE 87. Once the business locating in Retail Building B is fully operational, noise monitoring shall be conducted on one to two occasions, at the Applicants expense, under the supervision of the City, to ensure that the typical operational noise does not violate the City's noise ordinance standards. The monitoring shall 4;? be conducted at one or more locations chosen by the City at the perimeter of thei 0 7 property. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 19 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 STORAGE 88. No outdoor storage or outdoor storage containers will be permitted on the vacant area of Phase II for Building "B". However, storage and storage containers can be permitted along the rear of Building "B" provided a Minor Use Permit is granted by the Planning Commission using the business item review process. ARCHITECTURE 89. The rear elevations of Buildings "A" and "B" shall include visual interest as deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DEPARTMENT 90. The developer shall pay all fees and charges associated with providing domestic water and sanitation service in accordance with the current regulations of the District. Such fees and charges are subject to change. 91. The developer shall provide land on which a well site will be located. This site shall be shown on the tract map as a lot to be deeded to the District for such purpose. 92. Additional domestic water pipelines shall be installed by the subdivider in order for the District to provide service to all parcels. 93. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 55 and 82 of the District for sanitation service. 94. The District requires restaurants to install a grease interceptor, including a sample box, sanitary tee and running trap with cleanout, prior to any discharge to its sanitation facilities. The size of the grease interceptor shall be determined by the Riverside County Environmental Health Department and approved by the District. Installation of the interceptor shall be inspected by the District. 95. The District requires detail, repair and lube auto shops and car washes to install an oil and sand separator, including a sample box, sanitary tee and running trap with cleanout, prior to any discharge to its sanitation facilities. The size of the oil and sand separator shall be determined by the Riverside County Health Department and approved by the District. Installation of the oil and sand separator shall be inspected by the District. 4 ti cJ 1�8 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 20 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-728 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: MARCH 19, 2002 96. The District requires Laundromats and commercial establishments with laundry facilities to install a lint trap. The size of the lint trap shall be determined by the Riverside County Environmental Health Department and approved by the District. Installation of the lint trap shall be inspected by the District. 97. 'Plans for grading, landscaping and irrigation systems shall be submitted to the District for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoSDPCOA.wpd 21 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SUBDIVISION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION OF '62.10 ACRES INTO 18 COMMERCIAL LOTS, AND TWO LETTERED LOTS CASE NO.: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 26th day of February, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the Project, and did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-027, approving, the Tentative Parcel Map subject to the findings, and Conditions of Approval; and, WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 19TH day of March, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of Stamko Development Co. for subdivision of 62.10 acres into 18 commercial lots, and two lettered lots, in the Regional Commercial Zone, located immediately south of State Highway 1 1 1, east of Adams Street, approximately 300 feet west of Dune Palms Road and approximately 1,850 feet north of Avenue 48 and more particularly described as follows: APNS 649-030-057 thru 063 WHEREAS, an Addendum to a previously certified Environmental Impact Report and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ("Addendum") for approval of a Site Development Permit for a retail shopping center having 334,117 ± square feet, a Conditional Use Permit for a plant nursery/garden center, an auto repair/specialty shop, and an auto service 18 numbered and two letter lots ranging in size from .47 to 19.44 acres for the 87-acre Specific Plan area was prepared; and WHEREAS, said Addendum has complied with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has determined that although proposed could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects have been analyzed adequately in the earlier EIR and SEIR pursuant to applicable standards and have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to the earlier EIR and SEIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project and/or were made a part of the Addendum and/or included in the Conditions of Approval; and, 4 0 +. 14.3 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPM.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract Map 30420 Stamko Development Co. Adopted: March 19, 2002 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering the EIR, the Supplemental EIR, the Addendum, all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following findings of approval to justify approval of said Tentative Parcel Map: 1. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan and the adopted Specific Plan in that the lots will be used for commercial uses which conforms with the General Plan and its Elements provided the recommended Conditions of Approval are imposed. 2. The design and proposed improvements of the proposed map is consistent with the General Plan and adopted Specific Plan in that the development and improvements of the lots will comply with applicable development standards regarding, density, grading, access, streets, lot sizes and widths, etc., provided the recommended Conditions of Approval are imposed. 3. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements are not likely to cause environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish, or wildlife, or cause serious public health problems since the project is surrounded by development, or other urban improvements. 4. The design of the proposed map or types of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the development of the land will require compliance with all health related requirements including traffic calming techniques (i.e. stop signs, chokers, etc.), and provisions for sewers and water. 5. The design of the proposed map will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, the property within the proposed Map which currently exists. Any new easements will be provided and shown or noted on the map. 6. The proposed subdivision has been conditioned to comply with the existing Specific Plan development standards, zoning Code standards including access, stormwater retention, utilities. The adjacent properties have been adequately buffered and the subdivision should not cause serious public health problems. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 4 3 '- 1.4.1. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPM.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract Map 30420 Stamko Development Co. Adopted: March 19, 2002 2. That it does hereby approve Tentative Parcel Map 30420 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council , held on this 19th day of March, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PEI A, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC/AAE City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 4 142 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPM.wpd CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Parcel Map, or any Parcel Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Parcel Map, and any Parcel Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code § § 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at: www://la-quinta.org. 3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) • SunLine Transit Agency The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 430 143 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 1 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 4. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water), LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08-DWQ . A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs five (5) acres or more of land, or that disturbs less than five (5) acres of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than five (5) acres of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020 (Definitions), LQMC): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All of applicant's erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off site grading being done in relation to this project. F. All approved project BMPs shall be maintained in their proper working order throughout the course of construction, and until all improvements have been accepted by the City. 434 144 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 2 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 5. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). FIRE DEPARTMENT 6. Approved Super fire hydrants at every intersection and spaced every 330 feet along the street, and also they shall be located not less than 25' or more than 165' from any portion of the buildings as measured along approved vehicular travel ways. 7. Blue retro-reflective pavement markers shall be placed in the street 8 inches from centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 8. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. 9. City of La Quinta ordinance requires all commercial buildings 5,000 sq. ft. or larger to be fully sprinkled. NFPA 13 standard. Sprinkler plans will need to be submitted to the fire department for review. 10. Install Knox Key Lock box on each commercial building. Contact the fire department for an application. 1 1. Install portable fire extinguishers as required by the California Fire Code. 12. Minimum fire flow 2500 GPM, with an actual flow from any one hydrant connected to any given water main of 1500 GPM for 2-hours at 20 PSI reidual. 13. Building plans shall be submitted to the fire Department for plan review to run concurrent with the City plan check. 14. Any operation that produces grease -laden vapors will require a hood/duct system for fire protection. ( Restaurants, drive-thru's, etc.) 15. The applicant or developer shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designation required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/ or signs. 4 3 j 14J G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 PROPERTY RIGHTS 16. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 17. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Parcel Map all public street right-of- ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 18. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) State Route 1 1 1 (S.R. 1 1 1) - (Major Arterial) - 70 foot half right of way or additional right of way if required by Caltrans for the design of the approved construction and access plans for this parcel map. If required by Caltrans, acquire and deed additional right of way as necessary for widening of the median and resulting northward shift of the north side of the highway. . 2) La Quinta Centre Drive - (Collector Street) - 60 feet of right of way as required by the approved Specific Plan No. 97-029. 3) Auto Centre Way South - (Collector Street) - 74 feet of total right of way as required by the approved Specific Plan No. 97-029. 1.9. Right-of-way geometry for standard knuckles and property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801, and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 20. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans and as may be required by Caltrans and SunLine Transit Agency. 43 l40 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 4 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 21. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street right-of-ways shown on the approved Tentative Parcel Map are necessary prior to approval of the Parcel Map dedicating such right-of-ways, the applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-ways within 60 days of a written request by the City. 22. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Parcel Map a ten -foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of La Quinta Centre Drive and Auto Centre Way South. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. 23. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public right-of- ways as follows: A. S.R. 1 1 1 - Fifty (50) Feet from the R/W-P/L. B. Interior Public Streets - As required by the General Plan and City Code unless otherwise approved in the Specific Plan No. 97-029 for this development. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Parcel Map. 24. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Parcel Map. 25. The applicant shall vacate all abutter's right -of -access to public streets and properties from all frontages along such public streets and properties, excepting those access points shown on the Parcel Map. 26. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 27. When an applicant proposes the vacation, or abandonment, of any existing right- of-way, or access easement, which will diminish the access rights to any 4 3 147 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 5 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 properties owned by others, the applicant shall provide an alternate right-of-way or access easement, to those properties, or notarized letters of consent from the affected property owners. 28. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and the date of recording of any Parcel Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. PARCEL MAPS 29. Prior to the City's approval of a Parcel Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCAD files of the Parcel Map that was approved by the City's map checker on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. Such files shall be in a standard AutoCAD format so as to be fully retrievable into a basic AutoCAD program. Where a Parcel Map was not produced in an AutoCAD format, or produced in a file that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept a raster -image file of such Parcel Map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 30. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans), LQMC. 31. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. 438 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA."d 6 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 A. Public Street Plans: 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical The street improvement plans shall include permanent traffic control and separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. B. State Route 1 1 1 : As Required by Caltrans, including metric or dual units if required. C. Off -Site Street Median Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' D. Perimeter Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' E. On -Site Rough Grading Plan: 1 if = 40' Horizontal F. On -Site Precise Grading Plan: 1 " = 30' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. In addition to the normal set of improvement plans, a "Site Development" plan and a "Site Utility" plan are required to be submitted for approval by the Building Official and the City Engineer. "Site Development" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements. "Site Utility" plans shall normally include all sub -surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to sewer lines, water lines, fire protection and storm drainage systems. The "Site Utility" plan shall have signature blocks for the 4 Building Official and the City Engineer. 149 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 7 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 32. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City Resolution, the applicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes from the City. 33. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 34. Prior to the conditional approval of any Parcel Map, or the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 35., Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Parcel Map, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security), LQMC. 36. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 37. When improvements are phased through a "Phasing Plan," or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, 4 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 8 150 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 38. Depending on the timing of the development of this Tentative Parcel Map, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: (1) construct certain off -site improvements, (2) construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others, (3) reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this tentative parcel map, (4) secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others, or (5) to agree to any combination of these means, as the City may require. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Parcel Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 39. When improvements are to be secured through a SIA, and prior to any conditional approval of the Parcel Map by the City Council, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off -site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution, or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit costs shall be approved by the City Engineer. 44 151. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 9 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 At the time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for conditional approval of the Parcel Map by the City Council, the applicant shall also submit one copy each of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " reduction of each page of the Parcel Map, along with a copy of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " Vicinity Map. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. 40. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 41. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 42. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 43. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, and C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. ?4 4 '-) 15 ,_ G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 10 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 A statement shall appear on the Parcel Map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. 44. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 45. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 46. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot from the building pads in adjacent developments. 47. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. Building pad elevations on contiguous interior lots shall not differ by more than three feet except for lots that do not share a common street frontage, where the differential shall not exceed five feet. Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 48. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus three tenths of a foot from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Parcel Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Staff for a substantial conformance finding review. 49. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. 44 Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. ThI 5 3 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 11 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 50. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), LQMC, Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. The design storm shall be either the 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 51. Stormwater shall normally be retained in common retention basin(s) as shown on the Tentative Parcel Map. Individual lot basins or other retention concepts may be approved by the City Engineer for lots 2 Y2 acres in size or larger or where the use of common retention is determined by the City Engineer to be impracticable. If individual lot retention is approved, the applicant shall meet all individual lot retention provisions of Chapter 13.24, LQMC. 52. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise. 53. Nuisance water shall be retained on site by an approved system. 54. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 55. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 56. For on -site common retention basins, retention depth shall not exceed six feet and side slopes shall not exceed 3:1. For retention basins on individual lots, retention depth shall not exceed two feet. 44,_ G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 12 :1.5 4 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 57. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots along State Route 111. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of- way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to Section 9.100.040(B)(7), LQMC. 58. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries, levels or frequencies in any area outside the development. 59. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. UTILITIES 60. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.1 10 (Utilities), LQMC. 61. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 62. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 63. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. 4 4 ty 155 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 13 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 64. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access For Individual Properties And Development), LQMC for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 65. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 66. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) S.R. 1 1 1 from the east side of La Quinta Centre Drive to the easterly project boundary (Major Arterial) - Construct applicant's half of a 116 foot (curb face to curb face) street improvements. Construct a 28 foot wide raised landscaped median, and widen the north half as required for the widened section. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. Other significant new improvements required for installation in, or adjacent, to the subject right of way include: (a) 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk. (b) 28-foot wide landscaped median. (Developer is required to pay for 50% of the landscape median improvements at their own expense pursuant to Specific Plan 97- 029. The remaining 50% of the landscape median improvements will be reimbursed from the City's Development Impact Fee fund in accordance with policies established for that program.) 44 150 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 14 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 (c) Main entry streets, bus turnouts, acceleration/deceleration lanes, and/or other features contained in the approved construction plans may warrant additional street widths or other measures as determined by the City Engineer, Caltrans or SunLine Transit Agency. B. LA QUINTA CENTRE DRIVE 1) Construct 40 foot curb to curb full width improvements as shown on the Tentative Map and approved in Specific Plan No.97-029. C. AUTO CENTRE WAY SOUTH 1) Construct 54 foot curb to curb full width improvements as shown on the Tentative Map and approved in Specific Plan No. 97-029. 67. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential Collector Secondary Arterial Primary Arterial Major Arterial 3.0" a.c./4.50" c.a.b. 4.011/5.0011 4.0"/6.0011 4.511/6.0011 5.511/6.5011 or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 68. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Primary Entry (La Quinta Centre Drive at Highway 111): Existing signalized intersection with full turning movements. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 15 157 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 B. Secondary Entry (Highway 1 1 1 between La Quinta Centre Drive and the easterly project boundary): 1. Approximately 300' easterly of La Quinta Centre Drive: Right in only driveway. This access shall be designed and constructed to have a 20-foot wide access with appropriate signage. 2. Approximately 600' easterly of La Quinta Centre Drive: Right in/right out driveway. The proposed driveway(s) on S.R. 1 1 1 shall require Caltrans approval. C. Secondary Entry (La Quinta Centre Drive/Auto Centre Drive Intersection): Driveway entrance with full turning movements. D. Secondary Entry (La Quinta Centre Drive northerly of Auto Centre Way South): Driveway entrance with full turning movements. E. Secondary Entry (At the Southerly Terminus of La Quinta Centre Drive): La Quinta Centre Drive will terminate with ingress and egress into Parcel No. 1. 68. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 69. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 70. Standard knuckles and corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 71. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements. CONSTRUCTION 4{ 158 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 16 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 72. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphaltic concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include the test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include the most recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that the design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs have been approved. 73. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPING 74. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC. 75. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas, including S.R. 1 1 1. 76. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for approval by the Community Development Department (CDD) after Planning Commission review and action, prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking has been completed by CDD, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner, prior to submittal for signature by the City Engineer. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 44.:) 159 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 17 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 77. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. 78. The applicant shall ensure that landscaping plans and utility plans are coordinated to provide visual screening of above ground utility structures. 79. The final landscape plan shall include an enhanced landscape entry statement at the intersection of Auto Centre Drive and La Quinta Centre Drive. The enhancements are for the access lane east of La Quinta Centre Drive only. 80. The final landscape plans shall be reviewed by the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee and the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any permit for the construction of the parking lot. The review by the Planning Commission will be conducted as a business item. 81. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter and interior landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. A. For the Retail Building "B" site, a $25,000 bond or letter of credit in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, shall be posted prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Retail Building "B". The bond or letter of credit shall initially remain in effect for a period of five years. During that period, if the City determines that the landscaping is not being properly maintained, it shall provide notice, at the addresses to be provided by the applicant or owner, of the need to correct the specific deficiencies. If the deficiencies in the landscaping are not corrected within 30 days of the mailing of the notice, the City shall have the right to call the bond or letter of credit, and the proceeds shall be utilized to the extent needed to correct the landscaping deficiencies. If, after five years, the landscaping has been properly maintained, the City shall release the bond or letter of credit. If, in the determination of the Community Development Director, the landscaping has not been properly maintained, the bond or letter of credit shall be renewed and maintained for an additional five year period. B. For the entire Planning Area III, the landscaping and irrigation system shall be well maintained and any dead plant material shall be promptly replaced. If the landscaping is not properly maintained, and if the condition is not 4 J") cured within 30 days of the notice of the deficiencies, the City shall have G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 18 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 the right to cause the correction of the deficiencies in the landscaping, and the applicant/owner agrees that the costs of the correction shall be recorded as a lien against the property. This remedy shall be in addition to any other remedies the City has by law. PUBLIC SERVICES 82. The Bus Turnout and Shelter was not constructed with Parcel Map 28525 for the La Quinta Auto Mall. Condition No. 60. of PM 28525 is deferred to this Tentative Parcel Map. Bus turnouts shall be provided as a part of the project's public street improvements. The project developer shall provide a bus stop shelter that complies with the City's transit shelter plan for Highway 1 1 1, not to exceed fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) . QUALITY ASSURANCE 83. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 84. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 85. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that the construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. After tributary -area improvements are complete and soils have been permanently stabilized where retention basins have been constructed, testing shall include sand filter percolation tests, as approved by the City Engineer. 86. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City, revised 4� to reflect the as -built conditions. 1.61. G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 19 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 MAINTENANCE 87. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 88. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. FEES AND DEPOSITS 89. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 90. Prior to approval of a final map or completion of any approval process for modification of boundaries of the property subject to these conditions, the applicant shall process a reapportionment of any bonded assessment(s) against the property and pay the cost of the reapportionment. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DEPARTMENT 91. The developer shall pay all fees and charges associated with providing domestic water and sanitation service in accordance with the current regulations of the District. Such fees and charges are subject to change. 92. The developer shall provide land on which a well site will be located. This site shall be shown on the tract map as a lot to be deeded to the District for such purpose. 93. Additional domestic water pipelines shall be installed by the subdivider in order for the District to provide service to all parcels. 94. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 55 and 82 of the District for sanitation service. 4� 16 2 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 20 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30420 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 95. The District requires restaurants to install a grease interceptor, including a sample box, sanitary tee and running trap with cleanout, prior to any discharge to its sanitation facilities. The size of the grease interceptor shall be determined by the Riverside County Environmental Health Department and approved by the District. Installation of the interceptor shall be inspected by the District. 96. The District requires detail, repair and lube auto shops and car washes to install an oil and sand separator, including a sample box, sanitary tee and running trap with cleanout, prior to any discharge to its sanitation facilities. The size of the oil and sand separator shall be determined by the Riverside County Health Department and approved by the District. Installation of the oil and sand separator shall be inspected by the District. 97. The District requires Laundromats and commercial establishments with laundry facilities to install a lint trap. The size of the lint trap shall be determined by the Riverside County Environmental Health Department and approved by the District. Installation of the lint trap shall be inspected by the District. 98. Plans for grading, landscaping and irrigation systems shall be submitted to the District for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. 1.6.E 45 ,' G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\StamkoTPMCOA.wpd 21 ATTACHMENT #1 163 ATTACHMENT #4 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 V. PRESENTATIONS: None. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Addendum to Environmental Impact Report 92-337 (State Clearinghouse No. 97011055), Site Development Permit 2002-728, Conditional Use Permit 2002-067, and Tentative Parcel Map 30420; a request of Stamko Development Co. for Certification of an Addendum to an Environmental Impact Report for The Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan 97-029 (1997) and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (1998), State Clearinghouse No. 9701 1055; approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a plant nursery/garden center, an auto repair/specialty shop, and an auto service station in conjunction with Retail Building "B"; and approval of a Tentative Parcel Map to create 18 numbered and two letter lots ranging in size from .47 to 19.44 acres, to be located at the south side of Highway 1 1 1, between La Quinta Centre Drive and west of Dune Palms Road. 1. Commissioners noted they had each met with the applicant prior to the meeting to discuss the project. 2. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Community Development Director Jerry Herman presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3. Chairman Abels asked staff to clarify that the applicant had provided more parking spaces than were required. Staff stated that was correct. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. 4. Commissioner Butler asked about the heights of the lights in the parking lot. Staff noted that in the Highway 1 1 1 Shopping Center the lights area 39 feet high; the Auto Center has 24-foot high lights; and Lowe's and Home Depot have 24-foot high lights. Commissioner Butler asked if the lighting standards would have any impact as they would protrude over the top of the trees. Staff stated they would have to comply with the light standards. 5. Commissioner Tyler asked what the zoning was on the strip of land to the east of this project. Staff stated it was the same as this project, Regional Commercial. Commissioner Tyler asked the 4 5;) name of the street as it appears to have two different names. Staff noted the streets would be completed and will follow the 16 a G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 2 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 names as they are now. Commissioner Tyler asked about the turning access points. Staff noted the applicant negotiated the turning access points with Caltrans; the City was not involved. 6. Commissioner Kirk stated his concerns was whether or not the current Walmart building would be left empty. This does happen in other jurisdictions; is the City 's approach under Condition #84 something that would be enforceable. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated in her opinion it would be enforceable as both the applicant and Walmart have agreed to it. The Planning Commission is being asked to make a finding with regard to the Environmental Assessment Addendum, and it is within the Commission's purview to consider such a condition. Other jurisdictions have struggled with this issue and legal counsel believes it is enforceable. Commissioner Kirk stated that in regard to Condition #84.13 it sounds as if Walmart could provide an option to the City and that would meet the terms of the condition, but does not rule out the opportunity for Walmart to insist that that option require the City not lease or sell to a competitor, which could be a broad range of uses given the number of items and services this Walmart will sell; does this condition preclude that? City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated the option agreement that would be entered into, would have to be agreeable to the City. We did try to negotiate the terms and determined that was not possible for this meeting, so a condition was added that prior to issuance of a building permit, an option agreement that is acceptable and approved to the City would have to be agreed upon. Staff did leave an option for a different type of agreement that would satisfy the City's concern to make sure the building does not become a boarded up building. Commissioner Kirk asked if a sentence should be added to Condition #84.B.i., stating it would have to be acceptable to the City; would that be appropriate? City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated it would be appropriate and that was the understanding. The condition as stated says, "the City and Walmart shall execute..." and to her if it was not acceptable, the City would not execute it and there would not be a building permit. The City would not agree to purchase property for a fair market value and have restrictions on the reuse of the property. 7. Commissioner Tyler questioned why the Commission was considering such an agreement as this would normally be decided by the City Council. Community Development Director Jerry 4 5 4) Herman stated this is a Site Development Permit and the Commission is the final acting authority in this case. City 167 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 3 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 Attorney Kathy Jenson stated that if there were an option agreement, prior to issuance of building permit, it would be subject to the City Council approval. There would be no building permit issued on Retail Building "B" if the City were unable to work out an option agreement, or some other type of agreement, that would satisfy the City's concern. 8. Staff noted conditions had been received from CVWD and would be added to the conditions. 9. Commissioner Kirk questioned the 25 signs requested for Building "B", would they be permitted under the current Zoning Code. Staff noted the current Code allows 50 square feet of signage per elevation to the parking lot or street. The provisions of the Zoning Code allow the Commission to grant additional signage. Commissioner Kirk asked what the second largest structure was in the City. Staff noted probably Home Depot or Lowes. This building is approximately 50% larger than either of those buildings. Discussion followed regarding signage. Commissioner Kirk asked about the two accesses along Highway 1 1 1, is this appropriate and does it fit within the General Plan guidelines. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated they do comply. The closest, in access point, is 250 feet from the intersection at La Quinta Drive. Commissioner Kirk asked if staff believed the parking was acceptable from the Zoning Code perspective, with the number of parking spaces proposed. Staff stated it is not an engineering issue, but rather an aesthetics issue. 10. Commissioner Robbins asked if a large shopping center made up of several smaller shops, would they each be allowed to apply for a sign. Staff noted each shop would have its own signage and went on to explain the applicant's sign request. 11. Commissioner Tyler noted an economic study that was contained in the packet, and asked why this was submitted before the applicant has a signed tenant. City Attorney Kathy Jenson noted the City recommended this study be done as part of the Addendum. There is an argument under CEQA that if there are building vacancies that create adverse physical conditions, they can be considered as an environmental impact and the purpose of the report was to investigate whether or not this was a likely scenario. It is relevant to the Commission's CEQA review in 4 consideration of the Addendum. 168 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 4 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 12. Commissioner Robbins asked if under CEQA Walmart moved out and the building became vacant it would be a environmental impact. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated that was correct. Under CEQA, a purely economic impact is not considered an environment impact, but an impact that has secondary physical impacts. The creation of vacant run down buildings can be considered to be a physical impact that should be considered. Commissioner Robbins stated that if that building were to become vacant, the EIR would be false and lawsuits could pursue. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated that the question before the Commission is whether or not they are comfortable certifying the Addendum to the original EIR. The original EIR had an economic study that was prepared for it, but a Walmart was not considered. The purpose of this study was to provide the basis for the Commission's consideration on the Addendum as prepared. It is not a mitigation measure but a condition of approval if the project is approved in both the Site Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit. 13. Commissioner Kirk asked if it was not a part of the mitigation measures, what authority does the City have to condition an applicant like this. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated that under CEQA the Commission has the authority to make modifications to the project in order to avoid the issue. A concern was raised and to be sure the City requested the applicant to fund the Natelson Report. Commissioner Kirk stated we are using the CEQA analysis to express our concerns regarding the impacts of the empty building (Walmart), but do not identify it as even less than significant impact because of the economic analysis which suggests there is sufficient demand. What he thinks he is hearing is that the existing property owner, Walmart, may not give up that land to a potential competitor or third party. If that is the case, that would have an aesthetic impact and should be mitigated. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated this is not a Negative Declaration, but rather an Addendum and its purpose is to update an EIR to look at minor project modifications which is what is before the Commission. In order to approve the Addendum the Commission has to verify that the modification and circumstances have not changed from the original project approval or the original EIR within the scope of that original EIR. Commissioner Kirk stated this mechanism does not allow the City the opportunity to identify a significant impact. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated that if the Commission believes that the project as it is before the 4 5' 3 169 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 5 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 Commission with all the conditions that are imposed on it, if there is a potential for an impact, you would not certify the Addendum. It is her belief that the City has taken care of all the concerns through the modification and conditions of approval that have been incorporated and therefore the Commission has the ability to certify the Addendum. As a follow up to the condition on Page 127, she would recommend adding to Subpart "B", "subject to City satisfaction". 14. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Ms. Chris Clarke gave a presentation on the project. At the end of her presentation, the applicant requested clarification on the Assessor Parcel Numbers on each of the applications and that the off -site street issue with Highway 1 1 1 in the Tentative Parcel Map be the same as in the Site Development Permit. 15. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Tyler asked how many Walmarts there were in the Valley. Ms. Clarke stated there were some proposed for Palm Desert and Palm Springs. Community Development Director Jerry Herman asked if Ms. Clark agreed with condition #84 as amended by the City Attorney. Ms. Clarke stated she did agree. She further stated she has given a well site to CVWD and it is all she is required to give per her Specific Plan. In regard to the retention basin, she requests the condition be amended to comply with the City's new design guidelines for retention basins. 16. Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment. on this item. Mr. Dave Stark, Mazda Kia Superstore, representing the Auto Center on Highway 1 1 1, stated he supported the project as proposed and gave his reasons why. 17. Mr. Scott Gaynor, One Eleven Venture (across the street) 74,333 Highway 1 1 1, Palm Desert, stated his support for the project. 18. Mr. Joe Hammer, owner of the property to the east of the project, stated his support of the project. Commissioner Kirk asked if there was any opportunity for a shared access between the two properties. Mr. Hammer stated they had discussed the issue, but nothing had been agreed upon. 170 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 6 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 19. Mr. Paul Parrish, architect for the project, gave a presentation on the sign proposal for the building signs. This is a large building, set a long distance from Highway 1 1 1, therefore the amount of signage is reasonable. The signs provide directional assistance to the customers. Most signs are too small to be seen from Highway 1 1 1. Commissioner Kirk asked if the proposed 20 signs were for Phase I and II. Mr. Parrish clarified the request is for both phases. 20. Mr. Stan Rothbart, Rothbar Development, authorized representative for Walmart, thanked the City Attorney for her assistance for drafting Condition #84 and stated it is acceptable to Walmart. 21. Ms. Clarke asked for clarification on Condition #50.b. be amended to state she "....will be reimbursed..."; Condition #83 replace " the Planning Commission" with "Community Development Director". 22. There being no further public participation, the public comment portion of the public hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 23. Commissioner Tyler stated this is a wonderful opportunity for the City. There is a lot of focus on signage and asked if there was any way to continue this portion to a different time. Staff noted the Planning Commission could approve the project and continue the sign program to a future date as a business item. Commissioner Tyler stated his concern about the landscaping and Walmart's ability to maintain it. He would like the final landscaping to come back to the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee (ALRQ and the Planning Commission with some guarantee as to how it will appear. 24. Commissioner Robbins stated he agreed with Commissioner Tyler in that Walmart has not been a good neighbor to the City in regard to the landscaping and the storage containers. He has no problems with the project as proposed, but does have a problem with the performance level of Walmart. He asked how the City could ensure this center does not turn out the same way. He questioned the condition as it is written, as he was not sure that the landscaping as it is currently proposed, is acceptable. There needs to be discussion regarding the 34-foot high light standards, G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 7 46'. 171. Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 as he believes this is too high. He is concerned about the side and rear elevations as there is almost zero articulation. He is concerned about any future use of storage containers during Phase I so they are not in public view on the vacant land adjacent to the Building "B". 25. Commissioner Kirk stated that on the whole it is a good project. Much of the staff report was on the economic analysis. Building "B" design is pretty good for that size of a building in regard to articulation. Building "A", however, has very little articulation and interest and there was no comment from the ALRC. He is concerned about the blight that could be caused by Walmart leaving the existing center. He does commend the applicant and City Attorney on their work to resolve this issue. Other challenges are the signs as he does not agree with 20 signs no matter how far the building is from Highway 1 1 1. He also has concerns about lighting and parking. The Highway 111 Center has too much asphalt and poorly managed landscaping. This will be a positive project for the City once the issues are resolved. 26. Commissioner Tyler asked about Condition #38 regarding the telephone system. Staff was unaware of why it was there. Staff would remove it. 27. Chairman Abels commended the applicant on the appearance of the project. 28. Commissioner Tyler stated he believed signs were significant at the beginning, but once the center is built everyone knows where everything is located. 29. Senior Engineer Steve Speer went over some condition changes: Condition #39, if the retention basin goes below 6-feet deep the City will use the same criteria. Staff will delete the last sentence and replace with, "the retention basin depth may be increased in accordance with the provisions of revised Engineering Bulletin 97- 03". 30. Commissioner Robbins asked who was responsible for maintaining the retention basin and how does the City ensure the retention basin is maintained. Staff noted the City would require the merchant association would maintain it. Commissioner Robbins I - noted the problem of having the merchants maintain thei 72 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 8 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 landscaping up to the City's standards and the City has been unable to enforce this, what can be put into the conditions that has teeth to require the developer to maintain it. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated a commercial area should be treated differently than a residential district. A suggestion is that a condition be placed on them to pay the City to maintain it. 31. Commissioner Kirk asked if they could be conditioned that if it was determined the development was not being maintained, can the City condition the project to allow the City to go in and maintain at their expense. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated a condition could be added to that affect. Chairman Abels recessed the meeting at 9:08 and reconvened at 9:26 p.m. 32. Senior Engineer Steve Speer continued with condition changes: Condition #39, the last sentence will be deleted regarding the on - site two foot depth. Condition #50 A.1.b regarding the 28-foot wide landscape median, inside the parentheses staff will replace with "(developer is required to construct 50% of the landscape median for at their expense per the Conditions of Approval for Specific Plan 97-029)". "The remaining 50% of the expense will be reimbursed from the City's Development Impact Fee Fund in accordance with the policies established for that program." Condition #58, Change "30-feet" to "90-feet", in both locations. Condition #55, strike the last sentence. Condition #50.A.1. change to read "widened section" for both the Site Development Permit and Tentative Parcel Map. 33. City Attorney stated that in regard to the landscaping, it has been agreed to by both the City and the applicant, that in regard to Retail Building "B", there would be a posting of a $25,000 letter of credit or bond acceptable to the City Attorney and would remain in effect for five years. The property owner would have a 30-day notice period to correct any problems the City saw in the landscaping maintenance. The property owner would provide the addresses to which any notices would be provided. At the end of the five year period if they performed well, the bond would be released and if not the bond would be renewed for an additional five year period. Language would be added to Condition #69 to add "interior". 4 173 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 9 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 34. Commissioner Robbins stated this should apply to more than just Building "B". City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated the bonding requirement is something that was agreed to with Walmart, it is the Commission's prerogative. There is no occupant to consent or object at this time. Commissioner Robbins asked if it was a condition that could be placed on the merchant association for the entire site. Discussion followed as to applying this to the entire site and not just the Walmart site. Ms. Clarke stated there are two sets of CC&R's. A Master Association on the entire 90 acres and the existing Auto Centre has their own association under the Master Association. Additional associations can be created to control each of the tenants. 35. Commissioner Kirk added the condition should be strengthened to allow the City to notify the property owner that it was not be maintained as agreed to and go in and clean up the landscaping at the owners expense and lien the property. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated Retail "B" could be covered by the bond and the remainder of the site would be covered by a condition of approval. 36. Commissioner Kirk asked staff to explain how they came up with the number of signs they were recommending. Staff stated it was a determination based on other sign programs. Staff suggested the sign program be pulled and brought back for approval at a future date, under a business item. 37. Commissioner Kirk suggested Building "A" elevation articulation be brought back for review. Ms. Clarke stated she is willing to bifurcate Building "A", but this is Kohl's standard building. Mr. Gary Shepner, architect for the project, gave a presentation on the elevation design for Building "A". He suggested a popout treatment be applied similar to the Walmart building. Commissioner Kirk suggested the applicant work with staff to add some articulation to the rear elevation of Building "A" and "B" to add some visual interest. 38. Commissioner Robbins stated his concern regarding the height of the 34 foot high light standards. Following discussion it was determined to leave them at 34 feet. 4 174 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 10 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 39. Commissioner Robbins asked that a condition be added that while Walmart is being constructed and during Phase I, there will be no storage containers on the vacant eastern pad. They can apply for a permit to have the containers in the rear of the Walmart building. 40. Commissioner Kirk asked what the standard time limit was for a gas station. Staff stated it is not specifically stated in the Ordinance and there has been no standard. Discussion resulted in changing the time limit for the Conditional Use Permit to five years. 41. Commissioner Tyler asked that the street entering off of Highway 1 1 1 with a right -in be designated a one=way street. 42. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-024, recommending Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for an Addendum to the Centre at La Quinta Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (1997) and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (1998), subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 43. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-025, recommending approval of Conditional Use Permit 2002-067 subject to the findings and conditions of approval, subject to the conditions as amended: A. Condition #1: "...shall be used within five years..." B. Correct Condition #4.b: to add, "(i) an option agreement satisfactory to the City..." ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 1750 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 11 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 44. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-026 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-728, subject to the findings and conditions as amended: A. Condition #10: eliminate the sentence referring to the meandering wall. B. Condition #50.A.1.b. "(The developer is required to pay 50% of the landscape median improvements at their own expense pursuant to Specific Plan 97-029. The remaining 50% of the landscape median improvements will be reimbursed from the City's Development Impact Fee Fund in accordance with policies established for that program.)" C. Condition #58: Change 30-feet to 90-feet. D. Condition #64: The final landscape plan shall include an enhanced landscape entry statement at the intersection of Auto Centre Drive and La Quinta Drive. The enhancements are for the access lane east of La Quinta Drive only. E. Condition 50.A.1 : "...and widen the north half as required for the widened section." F. Condition #65: The final landscape plans shall be reviewed by the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee and the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any permit for the construction of the parking lot. The review by the Planning Commission will be conducted as a business item. G. Condition #67: The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter and interior landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. 1. For the Retail Building "B" site, a $25,000 bond or letter of credit in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, shall be posted prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Retail Building "B". The bond or letter of credit shall initially remain in effect for a period of five years. During that period, if the City determines that the landscaping is not being properly maintained, it shall provide notice, at the addresses to be provided by the applicant or owner, of the need to correct the specific deficiencies. If the deficiencies in the landscaping are not corrected within 30 days of the mailing of the notice, the City shall have the right to call the bond 1.76 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 12 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 or letter of credit, and the proceeds shall be utilized to the extent needed to correct the landscaping deficiencies. If, after five years, the landscaping has been properly maintained, the City shall release the bond or letter of credit. If, in the determination of the Community Development Director, the landscaping has not been properly maintained, the bond or letter of credit shall be renewed and maintained for an additional five year period. 2. For the entire Planning Area III, the landscaping and irrigation system shall be well maintained and any dead plant material shall be promptly replaced. If the landscaping is not properly maintained, and if the condition is not cured within 30 days of the notice of the deficiencies, the City shall have the right to cause the correction of the deficiencies in the landscaping, and the applicant/owner agrees that the costs of the correction shall be recorded as a lien against the property. This remedy shall be in addition to any other remedies the City has by law." H. Conditions #82-83: eliminated and replaced with a condition to require all signs to come back to the Planning Commission at a future date as a Business Item. I. Condition #86.A.b: "(i) an option agreement, satisfactory to the City..." J. Add a new Condition #88: "No outdoor storage or outdoor storage containers will be permitted on the vacant area of Phase II for Building "B". However, storage and storage containers can be permitted along the rear of Building "B" provided a Minor Use Permit is granted by the Planning Commission as a business item review process." K. Add a new Condition #89: "The rear elevations of Buildings "A" and "B" shall include visual interest as deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director." L. Add a Condition regarding the right -in off Highway 1 1 1 to be properly signed as a one-way. M. Add all conditions received from the Coachella Valley Water District ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 4' G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 13 177 Planning Commission Minutes February 26, 2002 E. 88. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-027, recommending approval of Tentative Parcel Map 30420, subject to the findings and conditions of approval. A. Condition #38: last paragraph eliminated B. Condition 65.A.1: "...and widen the north half as required for the widened section." C. Condition #76: "The applicant shall submit final landscape plans for approval by the Community Development Department after Planning Commission review and action and...." D. All conditions submitted by the Coachella Valley Water District in their letter dated February 25, 2002. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 2001-14 forte La Quinta Northeast Fire Station; a request of the City for Certification\Enironmental Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for an Assessment and approval of a Capital Improvement Pfor the construction of a fire station. 1 . Chairman Abels o ened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning C sultant Nicole Crist presented the information contained in the sta f report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Developm t Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked i there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Robbins aske\whythe Environmental Assessment was not included in the PCommission packet for their review. Chairman Abels recessed the hearing to allow the Co mission time to review the Environmental Assessment and reconvened the meeting. 3. Chairman Abels asked if there was any of r public comment on this item. There being no further public par 'cipation, the public comment portion of the public hearing was c sed and open for Commission discussion. 4 1. 78 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\2-26-02.wpd 14