The URL can be used to link to this page

2002 04 16 CCCity Council Agendas are available on the City's web page @www.la-quinta.org City Council Agenda CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-495 Calle Tampico - La Quinta, California 92253 Regular Meeting Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 2 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER Beginning Res. No. 2002-54 Ord. No. 370 ROLL CALL: Council Members: Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena II. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. III. CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956(a). COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT V. CITY OF LA QUINTA, CASE NO. INC 010827 2. CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956(a). CITY OF INDIO V. CITY OF LA QUINTA, CASE NO. INC 025560 NOTE: Time permitting, the City Council may conduct Closed Session discussions during the dinner recess. Additionally, persons identified as negotiating parties, do not attend the closed session when the City is considering acquisition of real property,. RECONVENE AT 3:00 P.M. 00.1 City Council Agenda Page 1 April 16, 2002 IV. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE V. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or matters that are not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. Please watch the timing device on the podium. For all Business Session matters or Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak to come forward at the appropriate time. VI. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA VII. PRESENTATIONS - None Vill. WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE 1. CORRESPONDENCE FROM LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL IX. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF MARCH 20, 2002 2. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF APRIL 2, 2002 X. CONSENT CALENDAR Note: Consent Calendar items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved by one motion unless requested for separate consideration by a member of the City Council or the public. 1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED APRIL 16, 2002. 2. TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING FEBRUARY 28, 2002. 3. REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING FEBRUARY 28, 2002 AND INVESTMENT SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 2002. 4. APPROVAL OF A REQUEST BY THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM (CaIPERS) TO UTILIZE THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS FOR A FINANCIAL PLANNING SEMINAR FOR RETIREES, JUNE 11 AND NOVEMBER 21, 2002, 8:00 A.M. TO 3:30 P.M. 5. APPROVAL OF A REQUEST BY THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT TO UTILIZE THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS FOR FREE LA QUINTA IMMUNIZATION CLINICS ON JUNE 12, JULY 9, AND AUGUST 14, 2002, FROM 10:00 A.M. TO 12:00 P.M. AND TUBERCULOSIS RECHECKS IN THE STUDY SESSION ROOM ON JUNE 14, JULY 12, AND AUGUST 16, 2002, FROM 10:00 A.M. TO 10:30 A.M. City Council Agenda Page 2 April 16, 2002 6. APPROVAL OF AWARD OF CONTRACT TO CONSTRUCT THE AVENUE 52 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 1999-04 A. 7. APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CITY OF INDIO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AND CVAG REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT AND MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF JEFFERSON STREET FROM HIGHWAY 111 TO INDIO BOULEVARD. 8. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE ACCOUNTING MANAGER TO ATTEND THE 2002 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION (GFOA) ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN DENVER, COLORADO, JUNE 16 - 19, 2002. 9. APPROVAL OF A CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION GRANT FOR A RECYCLING PROGRAM. 10. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO PREPARE THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003. 11. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA TO PROVIDE MILITARY SERVICE CREDIT. 12. APPROVAL OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION AND AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR WASHINGTON STREET/EISENHOWER DRIVE REHABILITATION, PROJECT NO. 2001-02 AND ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445(a). XI BUSINESS SESSION CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445 RELATING TO AN OPTION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND KSL LAND HOLDINGS, INC., PERTAINING TO THE PURCHASE OF 525 ACRES OF PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE RANCH AND GENERALLY BOUNDED BY THE CORAL REEF MOUNTAINS, AVENUE 52, JEFFERSON STREET, AND AVENUE 54; AND CONSENTING TO THE FUNDING THEREFOR. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION B. RESOLUTION ACTION 2. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM TO PROVIDE MILITARY SERVICE CREDIT. A. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE, READ BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING. B. APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. ON FIRST READING. City Council Agenda Page 3 April 16, 2002 3. CONSIDERATION OF A COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT REQUEST BY MARTIN LANGER TO PRODUCE A COMMUNITY CONCERT SERIES. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION. 4. CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 369, AMENDING SECTION 12.32.120 OF THE LA QUINTA CHARTER AND MUNICIPAL CODE, REGULATING THE PARKING OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLES. A. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 369 ON SECOND READING. XII. STUDY SESSION - None XIII. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS 2. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WORKSHOP/INFORMATION COMMITTEE (PENA) 3. C.V. MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (PERKINS) 4. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (SNIFF) 5. DESERT RESORTS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 6. DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AD HOC COMMITTEE (HENDERSON/ADOLPH) 7. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES COMMITTEE (HENDERSON) 8. MUSEUM EXPANSION COMMITTEE (ADOLPH/SNIFF) 9. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION & VISITORS AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 10. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION 11. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FREE LIBRARY SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE 12. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DESERT LIBRARY ZONE ADVISORY BOARD (HENDERSON) 13. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (PENA) 14. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY/SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP (PENA) 15. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MARCH 12, AND 26, 2002 16. ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES FOR MARCH 13, 2002 17. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES FOR JANUARY 13, FEBRUARY 21, AND MARCH 21, 2002 XIV. DEPARTMENT REPORTS 1. CITY MANAGER A. RESPONSE(S) TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK A. REPORT ON UPCOMING EVENTS 4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIRECTOR REPORT FOR MARCH, 2002 A. REPORT ON COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (CVAG) ANIMAL CAMPUS MEETING TO BE HELD APRIL 17, 2002 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MONTHLY REPORT FOR MARCH, 2002 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR MONTHLY REPORT FOR MARCH, 2002 A. REPORT ON 20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION ACTIVITIES 7. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT 8. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER MONTHLY REPORT FOR MARCH, 2002 9. POLICE CHIEF MONTHLY REPORT FOR MARCH, 2002. 10. FIRE CHIEF 0v'`x City Council Agenda Page 4 April 16, 2002 XV. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. XVI. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak form" and limit your comments to three (3) minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. XVII. PRESENTATIONS - None XVIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak, to come forward at the appropriate time. Any person may submit written comments to the La Quinta City Council/ Redevelopment Agency before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of, or in opposition to, the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the projects(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to the public hearing. 1. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING TO CERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-417 AND APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30092, AMENDMENT NO. 1, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 38.4 ACRES INTO 130 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MONROE STREET. APPLICANT BARTON PROPERTIES, INC. A. RESOLUTION ACTION 2. PUBLIC HEARING TO 1.) CERTIFY A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; 2.) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2002-084, A REQUEST TO CHANGE 10.76 ACRES OF LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE; 3.) ZONE CHANGE 2002-084, A REQUEST TO CHANGE 10.76 ACRES OF LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONE TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONE; AND 4.) SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-730, A REQUEST TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR A 149-UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX AND ANCILLARY FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF AVENUE 52, EAST OF JEFFERSON STREET. APPLICANT CLUBHOUSE ASSOCIATES, LLC. , A. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE, READ BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING B. APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. ON FIRST READING C. RESOLUTION ACTION. A REQUEST HAS BEEN MADE TO CONTINUE THIS PUBLIC HEARING. 0 0 City Council Agenda Page 5 April 16, 2002 3. PUBLIC HEARING TO CERTIFY AN ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2000-395 FOR SPECIFIC PLAN 2000-043, A REQUEST TO ALLOW REVISED DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN AN 81,907 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL CENTER AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND HIGHWAY 111. APPLICANT: MADISON/P.T.M. LA QUINTA LLC. A. RESOLUTION ACTION. XIX. ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to the regularly scheduled City Council Meeting, commencing with closed session at 2:00 p.m. and open session at 3:00 p.m., Tuesday, May 7, 2002, in the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. City Council Agenda Page 6 April 16, 2002 DECLARATION OF POSTING I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting of Tuesday, April 16, 2002, was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico and on the bulletin board at the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce and at Stater Bros. 78-630 Highway 1 1 1, on Friday, April 12, 2002. DATED: April 12, 2002 4�K �1/ CA-LI S. GREEK, CIVIC City Clerk, City of La Quinta, California PUBLIC NOTICES The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at 777-7025, 24- hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 777- 7025. A one (1) week notice is required. If background material is to be presented to the City Council, during a City Council meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the 3:00 p.m session or the 7:00 p.m session for distribution. City Council Agenda Page 7 April 16, 2002 2002 MARKET ANALYSIS Presented bv 7Eunchella Vallee EUU"UM1E Par-tnerHhrip Helpin y Innovathw Compt7int's Exj)(711d, Rcloc afe to The Copt IC1117 t allc'll. Funding Provided By: Riverside County Economic Development Agency Prepared By: John Husing, Ph.D, Economics & Politics, Inc. Copyright © 2002 Coachella Valley Economic Partnership. All Rights Reserved La Quinta Report, 2001 Table of Contents Number Topic Pa e I 1. Demographics 4 II H. Employment 9 III M. Housing 17 IV IV. Taxable Sales 21 V V. Banking 24 VI VI. Assessed Valuation 26 VII VII. Crime Rates 28 VIII VIII. Education 31 La Quinta Page 1 La Quinta Report, 2001 Exhibit List Number Topic Pa e I. Demographics 1 Population Growth, La Quinta, 1990-2001 _ 4 2 Population Growth Rates, La Quinta & Other Major Areas,1990-2001 4 3 Population By City, Coachella Valley Communities, 2001 5 4 Population Growth By City, Coachella Valley Communities, 1990-2001 5 5 Age Distribution, Number, La Quinta, 2000 6 6 Age Distribution, La Quinta & Coachella Valley, 2000 6 7 Ethnic Change, La Quinta, 1990-2000 7 8 Ethnic Composition, La Quinta & Coachella Valley, 2000 7 9 Income Estimates, La Quinta & Coachella Valley, 2001 8 10 Median Income By City, Coachella Valley, 2001 8 11 Total Income By City, Coachella Valley, 2001 9 IL Employment 12 Employment, La Quinta, 1997-2000 9 13 Employment Gain By Sector, La Quinta,1997-2000 10 14 Employment Growth Rates, La Quinta & Inland Empire, 1997-2000 10 15 Employment Distribution By Sector, La Quinta, 2000 11 16 Employment Distribution By Sector, La Quinta, 1997 11 17 Payroll, La Quinta,1997-2000 12 18 Payroll Growth, Allowing For Inflation, La Quinta, 1997-2000 12 19 Payroll Gain By Sector, La Quinta, 1997-2000 13 20 Payroll Per Worker, La Quinta, 1997-2000 13 21 Avg Pay Per Worker Growth, Allowing For Inflation, La Quinta,1997-2000 14 22 Average Pay Per Worker By Sector, La Quinta, 2000 14 23 Number of Firms, La Quinta,1997-2000 15 24 Growth in Number of Firms By Sector, La Quinta, 1997-2000 15 25 Distribution of Firms By Sector, La Quinta, 2000 16 26 Average Size of Firms, La Quinta,1997-2000 16 M. Housing 27 Existing Home Sales, La Quinta, Annual,1998-2001e 17 28 Existing Home Sales, Coachella Valley Cities, 2001 17 29 New Home Sales, La Quinta, Annual, 1998-2001e 18 30 New Home Sales, Coachella Valley Cities, 2001 18 31 Existing Home Price Trend, La Quinta, 1998-2001 19 32 Existing Home Price Prices, Coachella Valley Cities & So. Calif. Counties, 2001 19 33 New Home Price Trend, La Quinta, 1988-2001 20 34 New Home Price Prices, Coachella Valley Cities & So. Calif. Counties, 2001 20 IV. Taxable Sales 35 Taxable Retail Sales, La Quinta, 1990-2000 21 36 _ Taxable Sales Growth, La Quinta vs. Coachella Valley, 1990-2000 21 37 Retail Sales By City, Coachella Valley, 2000 22 38 Retail Sales Growth By City, Coachella Valley, 1990-2000 22 39 Retail Sales Per Capita, La Quinta & Coachella Valley,1990-2000 23 40 Retail Sales Per Capita, Coachella Valley Cities, 2000 1 23 La Quinta Page 2 La Quinta Report, 2001 Exhibit List Topic Pa e Number V. Banking 41 Bank Deposits, La Quinta,1992-2000 24 42 Bank Deposits by City, Coachella Valley Cities, 2000 24 43 Per Capita Bank Deposits, La Quinta, 1992-2000 25 44 Per Capita Bank Deposits, Coachella Valley Cities, 2000 25 VI. Assessed Valuation 45 Assessed Valuation, La Quinta Cities, 1990-2001 26 46 Assessed Valuation Growth, La Quinta & Coachella Vallee, 1990-2001 26 47 Assessed Valuation by City, Coachella Valley, Fiscal Year 2001-2002 Z7 48 Per Capita Assessed Valuation, La Quinta, 1990-2001 27 49 Assessed Valuation Per Capita, Coachella Valley Cities, 2000 28 VII. Crime Rates 50 Reported Crime Rate Per 1,000 Residents, La Quinta, 1993-2000 28 51 Total Crime Report per 1,000 Residents, Coachella Valley Cities, 2000 29 52 Violent Crime Reported Per 1,000 Residents, Coachella Valley Cities, 2000 29 53 Property Crime Reported Per 1,000 Residents, Coachella Valley Cities, 2000 30 54 Types of Crime Reported, La Quinta, 2000 30 VIH. Education 55 UC-CSU Course Completion, Riverside County School Districts, 2000 31 56 Scholastic Assessment Test Scores, Riverside County School Districts, 2000 31 57 % Students at/above National 50% Test Level, Grade 5, Desert Sands Unified, 2001 32 58 % Students at/above National 50% Test Level, Grade 10, Desert Sands Unified, 2001 32 01 La Quinta Page 3 La Quinta Report, 2001 By John E. Husing, Ph.D. I. Demouaph_ ics 1 14,334 151015,971 16,705 17 79 11,215 12,793 MMMMI 23,364 21,167 19,821 - 26,321 1990 1991 1992 1993 1991 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Source: CA Department of Finance • From 1990-2001, La Quinta's population increased from 11,215 to 26,321. This was a gain of 14,939 people in eleven years (Exhibit 1). • La Quinta's 48.4% increase in population from 1990-2001 was faster than the Coachella Valley (43.0%), the surrounding Inland Empire (30.3%), California (17.0%) or the U.S. (15.0%) (Exhibit 2). 48A% 43.0% 30.3% i 17.0% 15.0% 10.6% La Quinta Coachella Valley Inland Empire California L.os Angeles U.S. Source: CA Department of Finance, U.S. Census Bureau La Quinta Page 4 � � ) Exhibit '•• • By City Coachella• - 11 Indio 51,480 Cathedral City 4403 I I Palm Springs 43,819 i Palm Desert 42,334 La Quinta 26,321 Coachella 23,944 Desert Hot Spr. -16,999 Rancho Mirage 13,915 Indian Wells 4,024 Source: CA Department of Finance, U.S. Census Bureau • In 2001, La Quinta was the fifth largest community in the Coachella Valley, behind Palm Desert at 26,321 people. The next largest city was Coachella (23, 321) (Exhibit 3). • From 1990-2001, La Quinta had the 2nd largest gain in new residents among the Coachella Valley's nine cities (14, 939). The largest gain was in Palm Desert (19, 082). Two other cities added just under 15,000 people (Exhibit 4): Indio (14,687) and Cathedral City (14,558). Exhibit'•• •Growth Coachella• 991 11 Palm Desert 119,082 La Quinta 14,939 Indio 14,687 Cathedral City 14,558 Coachella 7,048 Desert Hot Spr. 5,331 Rancho Mirage 4,137 Palm Springs 3,638 Indian Wells 1,544 Source: CA Department of Finance, U.S. Census Bureau La Quinta Page 5 0-9 10-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45 _54 55-64 65-74 Over 75 Source: U.S. Censw, 2000 • In 20001 the largest population groups in La Quinta were children 0-9 (3, 930; 16.6%) and adults 35-44 (3, 904;16.5% ) with the 10-19 group (3, 503; 14.8%) just behind. The other younger parental group 25-34 was fourth (2, 975; 12.6%). In each case, these groups were larger than for the Coachella Valley generally. • There were 5,613 adults ages 55 and up. They represented 23.7% of La Quinta's population. This was comparable to the 28.0% in this group for the Coachella Valley generally (Exhibit 5-6). 0-9 10-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 }}45-54 55-64 65-74 Over 75 Source: U.S. Census, 2000 J La Quinta A Page 6 Exhibit 7.-Ethnic Change La Quinta, ••1 ili 6,881 4,707 395 1250 i i i 81 11 (13) White Hispanic Black Indian Asian Other Multi Source: U.S. Census, 1990 & 2(X)O • From 1990-2000, the U.S. Census showed La Quinta adding 12,312 people. Of these, the largest gain was 6,881 among Whites or 55.9% (Exhibit 7). • Hispanics accounted for 4,707 of La Quinta's population increase or 38.2%. All other groups represented a net gain of 724 or 25.3%. • As a result of these changes, from 1990-2000, the share of population in La Quinta that was White went from 70.4% to 62.9%. The Hispanic population went from 25.3% to 32.0% (1990 distribution's not shown). • In 2000, the Coachella Valley's White population was 49.4% and its Hispanic population was 44.3% (Exhibit 8). Coachella Valle Multi 3,174 1.2% Black Indian 5,748 1.098 2.2% 0.4% Asian Other 5,891 249 2.3% 0.1 % White Hispanic — 126,325 113,305 49.4% 44.3% Hispanic 7,584 32.0% Source: U.S. Census, 2000 La Quinta Multi 395 1.7% Black Indian 296 95 1.2% 0.4% Asian Other 420 11 �` i 0.0% i i� 1 i White 14,893 62.9% La Quinta Page 7 Exhibit 9.-Income Estimates La Quinta & Coachella Valley Cities, 2001 ' ■ La Quinta ❑ Coachella VaDey $89,366 $9. t billion � I i i $72,923 Indio has an estimated 9.1% of j $57,864 Coachella Vallev Income $44,984 i $31,398 $27,586 I I $826 million 1 Median Income Average Household Income Per Capita Income Total Income Source: U.S. Census, 1990 & Economics & Politics, Inc. • In 2001, it was estimated that La Quinta's total income was $926 Million. That is 9.1% of the $9.1 billion in total income of the Coachella Valley (Exhibit 9). • La Quinta's median income ($57,864) was above the regional figure of $44,984. Its average household income was $89,366 compared to $72,923 for the Coachella Valley. Its per capita income of $31,398 was just higher than the valley's $27,586. • La Quinta's median income ranked third in the wide variation found among Coachella Valley communities. The valley's range was from $158,300 in La Quinta to $31,447 in Desert Hot Springs. Rancho Mirage ($66,110) was the next highest, and Palm Desert (S54, 985) was the next lowest (Exhibit 10). Exhibit 10.-Median Income. Coachella00 $158,337 $66,110 $57,864 $64,986 $41,101 447 M$",8 $39, 283 $35,394 $31, bra'o m �,� ti4G Source: U.S. Census, 19% & Economics & Politics, Inc. I I J 4J La Quinta Page 8 • La Quinta is estimated to have had the fifth highest total income in the Coachella Valley at $826.4 million during 2001 (Exhibit 11). Palm Desert ($1.7 billion) was highest. Rancho Mirage ($929.2 million) was just ahead of La Quinta and Indio ($742.8 million) just behind it. II. Employment Exhibit .. La Quinta, •• 000 6,785 5,690 5,310 4,768 1,475 1997 1998 1999 2000 1997-2000 Source: CA Employment Development Department • From 1997-20005 La Quinta's employment went from 5,310 to 6,785. • The city had a gain of 1,475 jobs or 27.8% (Exhibit 12). • The city's employment dipped a little in 1998 and then surged in 1999 and 2000. U La Quinta Page 9 Exhibit 13.-Employment Gain By Sector La Quinta, 1997-2000 704 510 2" 163 144 106 88 51 (6) (529) Source: CA Employment Development Department • The growth of La Quinta's employment base was led by the construction sector which accounted for 704 of its 11,475 new jobs from 1997-2000 or 24.5% (Exhibit 13). Retailing added 510 jobs in this period and its government, education and utility group added 244. • La Quinta's hotel & amusement sector lost 529 jobs in the period, though this may have been simply a change in how one corporation accounted for its national employee base. • In 1999 and 2000, La Quinta added jobs much faster than the surrounding Inland Empire. Its growth rates were 19.3% and 19.2% compared to the region's 6.2% and 5.4%. Significantly, Southern California's inland region was the state's fastest growing major area (Exhibit 14). ExhibitU.-Employment La Quinta, •• 000 La Quinta 19.3% 19.2% ❑ Inland Empire 6.2% 5.4% 4.7% -10.2% 1998 1999 2000 Source: CA Employment Development Department La Quinta a. Page 10 Exhibit• • • •Sector La • Govt/Educ/Util 1'M 15.40% Other Construction f W5 1,074 8.9% 15.8°% Business Services 290 �r 4.3°% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail Trade 281 1,738 4.1% 25.6% Hotel & Amusement 1,750 25.8% Source: CA Employment Development Department • La Quinta's general economic expansion from 1997-2000 was accompanied by an increase in the diversity of its economy. The large hotel & amusement sector went from a share of employment fell from to 42.9% to 25.8% share of the city's job base (Exhibits 15-16). • At the same time, the city's expanding population meant that the growth in retailing employment caused its share of the job base to rise from 23.1% in 1997 to 25.6% in 2000. It remained the city's second most important sector. • Construction growth caused that sector to soar from 7.0% of employment to 15.8%. Meanwhile, rising population pushed the government, education and utility group from 15.1 % to 15.4%. • The city's very small sectors rose dramatically from 5.9% to 8.9%. Finance, insurance & real estate went from 3.6% to 4.1% and business service grew from 2.4% to 4.3%. Exhibit• • • • • By Sector La Quinta, 1997 Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 193 3.6% Other Business Services 311 127 2.4°% Construction 370 7.0% Hotel & Amusement 2,279 42.9% Govt/Educ/[Jtil / 803 J Retail Trade 1,228 23.1 % �I Source: CA Employment Development Department 0„L La Quinta Page 11 1997 1998 1999 2000 1997-1_0(K) Source: CA Employment Development Department • From 1997-2000, the total payroll released by La Quinta's firms and agencies rose dramatically from $123 million to $197 million (Exhibit 17). • The gain in La Quinta's payroll from 1997-2000 was $74 million or 59.7% in just three years. • Of this $74 million gain in payroll, $9 million was needed by workers to make up for the 7.2% increase in Southern California's price that occurred from 1997-2000. When this was deducted, La Quinta still saw the purchasing power of its local payrolls increased by $65 million or 52.5% (Exhibit 18). La Quinta, •• 000 $74 mil (59.70/6) $65 mil (52.50/6) $9 mil o / Nominal Growth Inflation Purchasing Power Growth Source: CA Employment Development Department La Quinta Page 12 Exhibit 19.-Payroll Gain By Sector (million) La Quinta, 1997-2000 Source: CA Employment Development Department • From 1997-20001 the largest share of the $74 million increase in the Coachella Valley's payrolls (25.7%) was from an $18.9 million gain in the construction sector (Exhibit 19). • Retailing accounted for the second greatest share of the gain (30.5%) as payrolls increased $13.3 million. The government, education & utility group was next (16.9%) due to a $12.5 million gain in its payrolls. • These three sectors were responsible for 60.6% of the new payroll released in the city. • In 19971 the average pay per worker in La Quinta was $23,244. By 2000, this had reached $291,052. This represented an increase of $5,808 or 25.0% (Exhibit 20). In 2000, the city's average pay level was well above the $25,577 for the full Coachella Valley. Avg Pay ❑ Avg Pa_y/CPI 1997 1998 1999 2000 1997-2000 Source: CA Employment Development Department i) AW -L La Quinta Page 13 Exhibit 21.-Payroll Per Worker Change & Inflation La Quinta, 1997-2000 Nominal Growth Inflation Purchasing Power Growth Source: CA Employment Development Department • While La Quinta's average pay per worker grew by $5,808 from 1997-2000, $1,636 of the gain was needed to keep up with the 7.2% gain in Southern California's prices. As a result, the average worker's purchasing power rose $4,125 or 17.7% in just three years (Exhibit 21). • La Quinta's small manufacturing & distribution sector had its highest average pay level at $53,185. Engineering & management was next ($47, 410) followed by "other" mostly professional services ($39, 583) and the government, education & utility group ($38, 444). • Also paying an average over $30,000 were finance, insurance & real estate ($34, 378), hotel & amusement ($32, 941) and health ($32, 703). The construction sector averaged $251631. • The lowest paying sectors were consumer services including temporary workers ($7, 051), and retail trade ($19, 367) (Exhibit 22). $53,196 $47,410 $39.50 $39,444 M379 =32,941 $3Z703 $25,631 $19,367 $7,051 d'0 �� 4c�` Fc�� ..�r'� cv°� mac •F�y Source: CA Employment Development Department La Quinta Page 14 1997 1998 1999 2000 1997-2000 Source: CA Emplownent Development Department • The number of firms in La Quinta has continuously grown from 216 in 1997 to 280 in 2000, a gain of 64 firms or 29.6% (Exhibit 23). • These numbers should be viewed as long term "general trend" data not "exact" data as they do not include entrepreneurs with no payroll. For this reason, small upward or downward fluctuations from year to year are not significant as they generally involve very small firms switching from pure entrepreneurs to employers of one or two workers. • From 1997-20005 the largest number of firms added in La Quinta were in the construction sector (27). No other sector added over 10 firms (Exhibit 24). 27 7 s s s 5 3 3 M I , J�oo°9�4�c5 o°G4�° zcs 4i�� ``4A e��°O crt C Source: CA Employment Development Department 00 V'I 0.0 La Quinta Page 15 Exhibit. • of • La Quinta, 2000 Hotel & Amusement Manufacturing & Distribution 515 17 Construction 6.096 '� 60 Engineering & Management 21.4% 20 \ 7.3% \ Other 33 11.896 Retail Trade 52 Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 36 12.9% Other Services 47 16.7% Source: CA Employment Development Department • Among the major sectors, the largest number of La Quinta's firms in 2000 were those related to the city's growth: construction (60; 21.4%) and retailing (52; 18.7%). • The next largest sectors were other services (47; 16.7%) and finance, insurance & real estate (36; 12.9%). In 2000, the 33 firms in smaller sectors accounted for 11.8% of the companies (Exhibit 25). • In 1997, the average number of workers in La Quinta's firms was 24.6. This declined in 1998 to 19.1 before recovering to 20.1 in 1999 and reaching 24.2 in 2000 (Exhibit 26). • La Quinta's firms remain are large by Coachella Valley standards. In the valley as a whole, the average firm employed 17.5 workers in 2000. Exhibit ..- Size of Firms . Quinta, 1997-2000 24.6 24.2 I 19.1 20.1 -0.3 1997 1998 1999 2000 1997-2000 Source: CA Employment Development Department La Quinta Page 16 III. Housing txn1D1i L/.-tx1511ng mill 1 a nuinta. 1988-201 742 698 668 574 540 520 434 402 ON 0 = I 719 705 686 640 599 570 M�MMMI 0, Source: Data uiq ck • La Quinta's existing home sales have tended to follow Southern California's real estate cycle. Sales soared out of the 1990s but plunged in the recession, bottoming at 434 units in 1995. In 1997, sales were unusually strong at 719 units. From 1998-2001, they returned to a more normal growth path reaching 705 units in 2001 (Exhibit 27). • In 2001, La Quinta had the third highest sales in the Coachella Valley at 705 units. Palm Springs (807) was the next highest (Exhibit 28). Cathedral City (613) was the next lowest. Palm Desert (821) led the area. Exhibit• Home Coachella11 Palm Desert 821 Palm Springs 807 La Qumta 705 Cathedral City I613 Indio 575 Desert Hot Spr. 524 Rancho 1 is a 213 Indian Wells 102 Coachella 1 1 Source: Dataquick Q La Quinta Page 17 c1�� Q1�� q�0 qq1 SQL qq� �qA AQ5 alb CO, °�� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '1 1 1 Source: Dataquick i • In 2000, La Quinta's new home sales rose to a new record of 815 sales in 2000 before settling to a relatively strong 558 units in 2001 (Exhibit 29). • Prior to 1998, La Quinta's new home sales cycled with the Southern California market but in a narrow range with lows under 150 units and highs around 300 units. In 1998, construction and sales set a record at 384 units before climbing to over 500 units from 1999-2001. • In 2001, La Quinta's new home sales ranked first in the Coachella Valley. Indio (534) was second followed by Palm Desert (420). All other cities were below 250 units. (Exhibit 30). Exhibit 30.-New Home Sales Coachella Valley Cities, 00 La Quinta 558 Indio 534 Palm Desert 420 Cathedral City 236 Rancho Mirage 156 Palm Spnngs I Indian Wells F::133 Coachella 730 Desert Hot Spr. 3 Source: Dataquick 0,r7 % ,_ 4J La Quinta Page 18 Exhibit 31.-Existing Home Price Trend La Quinta, 1988-2001 $158,193 $147,802 $149,495 5141,713 $135,148 $133,T74 :139'S82 $132,8T6 :130,168 $138,711 _125,593 - s11 s,53o $87,721 $185,464 1 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Source: Dataquick • La Quinta's median existing home price was at a record high of $185,464 in 2001, up 17.2% over 2000. Since the post -recession low of $125,593 in 1998, the city's median price has increased $59,871 or 47.7% (Exhibit 31). • La Quinta's existing homes were reasonably priced by Coachella Valley and Southern California's standards (Exhibit 32). In 2001, its $185,464 median price ranked fifth in the valley. Palm Desert had the next highest price (S230, 056) and Cathedral City the next lowest ($145, 841). • The city's median existing home price (half above and below) was higher than those for San Bernardino ($138, 000) and Riverside ($165, 000) counties, but below those of Los Angeles (S237, 000), San Diego ($280, 000) and Orange ($330, 000) counties. Indian Wells Rancho Mirage Orange Co. San Diego Co. Palm Springs Los Angeles Co. Patin Desert La Quinta Riverside Co. Cathedral City San Bernardino Co. Indio Coachella Desert Hot Spr. $377,910 $330,000 $280,000 $240,522 $237,000 _ $230,056 $185,464 44 $165,000 - $145,841 1$138,000 _ $136,656 1$91,356 $88,587 Source: Dataquick W4,922 La Quinta Page 19 $218,552 $193,082 $196,200 $163,011 $176,626 $176,408 $167,085 $171,207 — ■ = - $148,055 $144,610 _ ■ $310,733 $274,487 $275,774 M $349,802 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Source: Dataquick • La Quinta's median new home price set a record at $349,802 in 2001 when 558 homes were sold. This was up from $310,733 for the record volume 815 homes in 2000 (Exhibit 33). • La Quinta's new homes were fairly expensive by Coachella Valley's standards. In 2001, its $349,802 median price ranked third in the valley. It was below that of Rancho Mirage ($412, 327) and more than Palm Desert ($319, 399) (Exhibit 34). • The city's new homes were somewhat affordable by Southern California's standards. Its 2001 median price was higher than in San Bernardino ($214, 000), Riverside ($248, 500) or Los Angeles ($309, 000) counties. However, it was lower those in San Diego ($355, 000) and Orange ($476, 250) counties. Orange Co. Indian Wells Rancho Mirage San Diego Co. La Quinta Palm Desert Palm Springs Los Angeles Co. Riverside Co. San Bernardino Co. Indio Cathedral City Coachella Desert Hot Spr. 1$119,233 $93,885 $476,250 $433,848 $412,327 — $355,000 —� $349,802 1 i319,399 $316,070 $309,000 — $248,500 = $214.000 7 $205,666 $182,578 Sour ec Da quick �ej La Quints - Page 20 IV. Taxable Sales Exhibit 35.-Taxable Retail La Quinta, ••0000 $318,057 j $240,453 $213,973 I I $159,146 $132,892 $121,428 $110 861 $102,994 � $76,178 $66,916 $63,286 i 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Source: CA Board of Equalizatioi� • La Quinta's retail sales have soared in recent years. In 2000, the city's taxable sales reached a record $318.1 million, up $251.1 million or more than four -fold (375.3%) from their $66.9 million level in 1990 (Exhibit 35). In 2000 alone, the community's sales rose $77.6 million. La Quinta's retail sales have exceeded the growth of the rapidly expanding Coachella Valley in most years. In 1998 (34.5%) and 2000 (32.3%), its growth rate was more than double that of the entire valley: 11.0% and 13.6% (Exhibit 36). Exhibit 36.-Taxable Sales Growth La .. Quinta vs. ••� �� 35.2% La Quinta ❑ Coachella Valley 34.5% 32.3% 19.8°.6 15.5% 13.6% 12 4°� 11.0 9.5% 9.4% 8.9% 7.6% 5.4% 5.8% 04.3°k 3.0%U 0.9% 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2ix10 Source: CA Board of Equalization 4.. La Quinta Page 21 Exhibit •- 111 Coachella111 $1,217,986 i $680,S02 $601,316 i $473,781 $318,057 $322,907 i $132,640 $63,475 $68,599 Coe 1�� 4s :; Source: CA Board of Equalization • In 2000 La Quinta ($318.1 million) had the 6th highest retail sales in the Coachella Valley. Palm Desert led the region with $1.2 billion. Rancho Mirage ($322. 9 million) was just ahead of La Quinta and Coachella ($132.6 million) was well below it (Exhibit 37). • From 1990-20001 La Quinta added $251.1 million in sales. That was the third largest gain in sales after Palm Desert ($689.1 million) and Cathedral City ($290. S million) (Exhibit 38). The next lowest growth was in Rancho Mirage ($158.6 million). Exhibit• - • 111 Coachella••1 111 Palm Desert $689,120 Cathedral City $290,494 La Quinta $261,141 Rancho Mirage $168,638 Palm Springs $112'072 i Indio $"'163 Coachella $64,932 Desert Hot Spr. $19,292 Indian Wells $ 16,648 Source_ CA Board of Equalization La Quinta Page 22 Exhibit -Capita La Quinta vs. Coachella991 111 $17,500 La Quetta ❑ Coachella Valley 212,500 510,000 $7,500 - I -' $5.000 i 22,500 A I $0 LL- = 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 SourceCA Board of Equalization • A key measure of prosperity is per capita taxable sales as it shows how well communities can finance services to each resident. In 2000, La Quinta's per capita sales were $12,803. The city's sales per person was under the $14,780 level for the Coachella Valley (Exhibit 39). By comparison, the rate for the Inland Empire was $10,773 and it matched California's $12,803. • Among the Inland Empire's 48 cities, La Quinta ranked 15th in per capita sales. Within the Coachella Valley, its position was sixth (Exhibit 40). Palm Springs was just higher ($13, 817). Indio was the next lowest ($9, 357). Exhibit41 Per • Coachella111 Palm Desert $29,081 Rancho Mirage $23,735 Indian Wells $17,776 Cathedral City $15,519 Palm Springs $13,817 La Quinta $12,803 Indio $9,357 Coachella $6,673 I Desert Hot Spr. $3,753 Source: CA Board of Equalization La Quinta 0 Page 23 1992-2000 Bank Deposits up S73.1 million or 1333% $64,871 $66,332 $57,282 1� 1P 10 10 V. BankinQ $98,186 $88,169 .,0 1e "0 Source: Sheshunoff Information Group $128,041 $73,170 • Total deposits in La Quinta's area financial institutions rose steadily from $54.9 million in 1992 to $128.0 million in 20001 a gain of $73.1 million or 133.3% (Exhibit 41). This was substantially above the 17.2% gain in the Coachella Valley or the 13.7% increase in the surrounding Inland Empire. • In 20005 La Quinta's $128.0 million in financial deposits ranked seventh in the Coachella Valley. Deposits in Cathedral City were just higher ($157.5 million). Those in Indian Wells were the next lowest ($117.5 million) (Exhibit 42). Palm Desert Patin Springs Indio Rancho Mirage Desert Hot Spr. Cathedral City La Quinta Indian Wells Coachella $314,129 :294,914 ■_ $170,213 $157,536 _ $128,041 Ad $117,546 . $40,183 Source: Sheshunoff Information Group $972,298 s La Quinta Page 24 1992-2000 Per Capita Deposits up 31.423 or 38.1 % 1991-1 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2W0 1992-21" Source: Sheshunoff Information Group • Deposits per capita in La Quinta have risen irregularly from a low of $3,731 in 1992, to a record high of $5,154 in 2000, a gain of $1,423 per person or 38.1% (Exhibit 43). Deposit fluctuation have been impacted by the opening and closing of bank branches. Also, in the mid-1990s, U.S. bank deposits generally fell off as consumers began relying more heavily on money market funds for their checking and mutual funds for their savings. • In 2000, La Quinta ranked 7 h in per capita deposits ($5,154) among the Coachella Valley's nine cities (Exhibit 44). Indio was the next highest ($6, 204); and Cathedral City was the next lowest ($3, 593). The city's level was below the average for Riverside County (S7, 551). Exhibit'- • Deposits Coachella111 Indian Wells $30A60 Palm Desert $28,176 Palm Springs $22,341 Rancho Mirage $21,678 Desert Hot Spr. $10,065 Indio $6,204 La Quinta $5,154 �� Cathedral City $3,593 Coachella $1,720 Source: Sheshunoff Information Group () 3 J La Quinta Page 25 VI. Assessed Valuation Exhibit-• Valuation (billions) Quinta,La ••1 11 $3.77 I 1990-2001 Assessed Valuation Growth $2.5 billion or 196.5% ( $3.14 $2.64 SZ50 $2.32 $2.19 ! $1.93 $2.02 $2.04 I $1.76 $1.58 1 $1.27 I, ! I i 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 19910-2t01 Source: Riverside County Assessor's Office i • Consistent with the expansion in La Quinta's housing stock, its assessed valuation has accelerated in recent years. As a result, from 1990-2001, the city's valuation nearly tripled from $1.27 billion to $3. 77 billion, a gain of $2. 5 billion or 196. 5% (Exhibit 45). • In 2001, La Quinta's assessed valuation outperformed that of rapidly growing Coachella Valley. From 1999 to 2001, the city saw its assessed valuation increase by 13.70NO, 18.9%, and 19.9% respectively, versus the valley's 6.9%, 12.8% and 12.0%. (Exhibit 46). La Quinta ❑ Coachella Valley Cities 29.6% 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 ,f ii.i() dul l Source. Riverside County :kssessor's Office La Quinta Page 26 Palm Desert Palm Springs La Quinta Rancho Mirage Indian Wells Cathedral City Indio Desert Hot Spr. Coachella Source: Riverside County Assessor's Office • In July 2001, La Quinta's $3.77 billion in assessed valuation ranked third among the Coachella Valley's nine cities. Only the valuations in Palm Desert (S7.23 billion) and Palm Springs (S5.03 billion) were higher. (Exhibit 47). • Assessed valuation per capita is another measure of a community's ability to finance governmental services for each resident. From 1990-20011 this measure rose 26.4% or $29,885 in La Quinta from $113,284 to $143,139 (Exhibit 48). • For most of its recent history, La Quinta's per capita valuation fluctuated in a narrow band due to relatively mild construction figures and some price fluctuations. Valuations took off and outpaced population in the 1998-2001 period, leading to the rising numbers. 1"0-2001 Assessed Value Per Capita Up $29,355 or 26.4% $143,139 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 IN90-2001 Source: Riverside County Assessor's Office La Quinta Page 27 Exhibit• • • Valuation Per. • Coachella11 Indian Wells $707.208 Rancho Mirage $267,425 Palm Desert $170,719 La Quanta $143,139 i Palm Springs $114,885 i Cathedral City $46,396 Indio $33,038 Desert Hot Spr. 1 $29,432 Coachella $19,629 I Source: Riverside County Assessor's Office I I • In July 2001, La Quinta ($143,139) had the fourth highest assessed valuation per capita in the Coachella Valley (Exhibit 49). Palm Desert ($170, 719) was the next highest, and Palm Springs ($114,885) was the next lowest. VII. Crime Rates Exhibit1 '-•• -• Crime Rate Per 1,000 Residents La • •• 111 69.9 Crime Rate Per 1,000 Residents 69.0 66.4 1993-2000 �� Down 39.5% 53.9 I 47.3 46.9 47.1 I I 41.8 1 i I ----- _� 1993 1994 1995 19%, 199- 1998 1999 1-000 Uttiform Cruse Report, FBI J • Crime rates in La Quinta dropped dramatically since 1993. From 1.993-2000, the number of incidents per 1,000 people fell from 69 to 41.8 incidents, a drop of 39.5% (Exhibit 50). This occurred as 34 fewer crimes (-3.2%) were reported despite the fact that the population increased by 9,318 (60.0%). La Quinta Page 28 Exhibit • • • • Per 1,000 Residents Coachella000 Rancho Mirage 1.8 Riverside County 38.6 Coachella .0 Cathedral City 8 La Qumta 41.8 Indian Wells 42.8 Patin Desert 43.9 I Indio 44.1 I Coachella Valley Cities 49.6 I Patin Springs 75.0 Desert Hot Spr. 9.0 Source: Uniform Crime Report. FBI • By city, La Quinta's 41.8 crimes per 1000 people in 2000 was the fourth lowest in the Coachella Valley. Cathedral City's rate was just lower at 40.8 and Indian Wells was just higher at 42.8 (Exhibit Sl ). • Total incidents averaged 38.6 per 1,000 Riverside County residents and 49.6 per 1,000 residents in the Coachella Valley generally. This is typical due to property related incidents in areas with large numbers of homes occupied part time and numerous tourists. • La Quinta reported 4.2 violent crimes per 1,000 people rate in 2000. 'That ranked 41h in the Coachella Valley and was below Riverside County's rate of 6.1 (Exhibit 52). Palm Desert (4. 0) was the next lowest and Cathedral City (6.1) was the next highest. Exhibit• Reported Per 1,000 Residents Coachella1// Rancho Mirage 1.9 Indian Wells 3.9 Palm Desert 4.0 La Qumla 14.2 Riverside County 1 Cathedral City 1 Indio 9 Coachella Valley Cities 7.0 Coachella 9.1 Palm Springs 10.5 Desert Hot Spr. 15.0 Source. Uniform Crime Report FBI La Quinta Page 29 Coachella Rancho Mirage Riverside County Cathedral City Indio La Quinta 3T.6 Indian Wells 38.9 Patin Desert 0 I Coachella Valley Cities 42.5 r Desert Hot Spr. t Palm Springs Source: Urriform Crime Report FBI 64.0 64.5 • La Quinta's property crime rate in 2000 was 37.6 incidents per 1,000 people (Exhibit 53). This ranked the fifth lowest in the Coachella Valley. Indio was the next lowest (37.2). Indian Wells was the next highest (38.9). The city's property crime was below the rate for Riverside County (32.5) and well below that for the Coachella Valley (42.5). • In 2000, 89.6% of the 1,038 crimes report in La Quinta were motor vehicle thefts (536), burglaries (303) and larceny theft (91). Just 1.3% of the city's incidents were violent crimes such as murder (3), arson (4) or rape (7) (Exhibit 5.1). i 536 I i j I I i 303 91 so 3 7 14 4 Murder Forcible Rape Robbery Aggravated Assault Burglary Larceny Theft Motor Vehicle Theft Arson Source: Uniform Crime Report, FBI La Quinta Page 30 VIII. Education Exhibit 55.-UCICSU Course Completion Riverside County School Districts, Class of 2000 Banning Riverside Desert Sands Moreno Valley Val Verde Temecula Calif. Beaumont San Jacinto Corona -Norco Lake Elsinore Hemet Jurupa Alvord Riv. County. Perris Murrieta Valley Palm Springs Coachella Valley ® 39.7% 1.3% �w .2% 1% I Department of Education j • La Quinta's students are served by the Desert Sands Unified School District. Of the Class of 2000, 38.3% completed the courses required for University of California or California State University (Exhibit .55). The Riverside County average was 29.4%. The California average was 34.8%. • The Desert Sands Unified School District saw 37.2% of its seniors take the 2000 Scholastic Assessment Test. Their the average score was 957. That was just below the California average of 1,015, but above Riverside County's average of 951 (Exhibit 56). La Quinta Page 31 Reading Math Language Spelling Source: CA Department of Education Each year, California elementary school students are tested in reading, math, language and spelling. In 2001, the share of the Desert Sands Unified School District's 5`" graders scoring at or above the national 50% level was even with Riverside County in math (48%) and language (46%) but slightly lower on the other two tests. California's average was higher on each test (Exhibit 57). • Similarly, high school students are tested on reading, math, language, science and social science. In 20011 the share of the Desert Sands Unified School District's 10`" graders scoring at or above the national 50% level in math (43%) was higher than Riverside County, but lower on the other four tests. California's average was higher on each test (Exhibit 58). Exhibit 58.-10th Grade SAT 9: Percent at/above National 50% Level Desert Sands Unified School District, Riverside Co. & California, 2001 Desert Sands Unified ❑ California Q Riverside County 43% 45 °� 46% 42% 42% 40% 40°k 38% 34% 36% � 32% 31 % 33% 30% 27% 1. L Reading Math Language Science Social Science Source: CA Department of Education � _ I La Quinta Page 32 PROGRAM FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE CONFERENCE AND ECONOMIC OUTLOOK BUSINESS FORUM Monday, April 29 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 8:00 a.m. Welcome by the Tri-Valley Alliance 8:30 a.m. Worldwide Economic Outlook Presented by: Union Bank of California 9:15 a.m. NAFTA and Foreign Trade Opportunities Presented by Mr. Andrew Rudman, Deputy Director U.S. Department of Commerce 10:00 a.m. Break 10:15 a.m. Presentation: Td Valley Alliance 10:30 a.m. Business Opportunities in the Coachella Valley 11:00 a.m. Business Opportunities in the Imperial Valley 11:30 a.m. Business Opportunities in the Mexicali Valley NOON LUNCH Keynote Speaker, Richard Heckmann, Founder U.S. Filter 1:30 p.m. Reconvene and Review of Aftemoon 1:45 p.m. Roundtable Discussions, Session i A. Education B. Transportation / Distribution C. NAFTA / FTZ and Maquiladora Opportunities D. Utilities and Technology Infrastructure 2:45 p.m. Break 3:00 p.m. Roundtable Discussions, Session 11 A. Education B. Transportation / Distribution C. NAFTA / FTZ and Maquiladora Opportunities D. Utilities and Technology Infrastructure 4:00 p.m. End of Business Forum Coache//a Va//ey Ecvnarmic Partners�iip04 1 ielping Innovative Companies ):xpwidlRelocate to '17te Cond wila Valley. 20021nternatioani Trade Conference Economic Outlook COMPANY 1 Advanced Respiratory 2 Amerpack $A de CV 3 Butete Ignacio A Guajardo SC 4 California Secretary of State 5 Central. Video 6 Central Video 7 Central Video 8 Centro SCT Baja California 9 CETYS Universidad 10 CETYS Universidad I 1 CETYS Universidad 12 Consulate General of Canada 13 Consulate General of France 14 Consulate General of Hungary 15 Consulate General of Hungary 16 Consulate General of New Zeland 17 Consulate General of Sweden 18 Consulate General of Sweden 19 Consulate General of the Czech Republic 20 Consulate General of the Peoples Republic of China 21 Consulate General of the Russian Federation 22 Consulate General of Vietnam 23 Consulate General of Vietnam 24 Daewoo Orion Mexican 25 Daewoo Orion Mexicana 26 Emetec 27 Emetec 28 EX-XXI Business Center 29 EX-XXI Business Center 30 Genesis de Baja California 31 Genesis de Baja California 32 GMpo Hernandez .33 Grouo Promesa 34 IVEMSA 35 IVEMSA 36 Jasons Creations 37 Jasons Creations 38 Mexicali Esfuerzo Compartido 39 Mexicali Esfuerzo Compartido 40 Municipal del Decimo Setimo Ayuntaniento 41 Nelson Group 42 NexteI Communications 43 Parque Industrial 44 Pilkington 45 Progreso Industrial Park 46 Sony Mexico Manufacturing Center 47 Sony Mexico Manufacturing Center 48 State Government of Baja California 49 State Government of Baja California 50 State Government of Baja California 51 U.S. Department of Commerce 52 Union Bank of California 53 Union Bank of California CONTACT Eldon Russell Jaime Carbo Maldonado Arturo Guajardo Araiza Bill Jones Adolfo Martinez Alejandro Monge Manuel Muniz y Marquez Enrique Blancas de la Cruz Sergio Rebollar McDonough Colin Robertson Jean -Luc Sibiude Odon Kiraly Agnes Kiraly Darryl Dunn Andreas Ekmau Anita Elcmann Michael Korycanek Lan Lijun Nicolai Lyashemko Nguyen Manh Hung Cuong Nguyen Joon Sung Park Fracisco Molina Robles Richard Salter Richard Salter Eugenio Lagarde Cameron Manuel Hernandez - Francisco Fuentes Terrazas Rodolfo Andrade Jason Simms -Lee Jaime Rafael Diaz Ochoa Jaime Diaz Rodolfo Nelson Paul Saleh Eduardo Martinez Palomera Arturo Benavent Francisco Fuentes Arestegui Rey Huerta Sergio Tagliapietra Nassri Eugenio Elorduy. Roberto Reyes Andrew Rudman Terrance Flanagan Joseph Benoit TITLE VP Mktg & Sales Administration & Finance Abogado Secretary Operations Director General Director guest Director General Rector del Sistema guest Director General Consul Consul Deputy Dir/Comm Affairs guest Counsul Consul guest Commercial Consul Consul Consul Consul General Consul President & CEO guest President guest Marketing Director guest ' President guest Director General Project & Marketing Mgr guest Presient Sum guest President President Executive VP & CEO Exec. Vice President General Manager Director President guest Secretary of Econ Devel Governor Business Devel Undersecretary Deputy Director World Operations Manager Senior Vice President 04 WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE ITEM: 0 I�• ,'a' ��. f' Y LJ 'fib Y International Baccalaureate Programme March 25, 2002 Mayor John Pena City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, Calif. 92253 Dear Mayor Pena, Mpp 2 8 I was a little confused when I called your office to see how our request for ring funding went. The secretary I talked to said that the council decided on no action because the rings had already been paid for. This is true to a degree, but we had to deplete all of our booster funds to pay the bill. We needed to pay it off before March 19dand that was when the council was meeting. This leaves us no money for the remainder of the school year and summer program. Typically it takes a few thousand dollars to maintain our program for this time frame. We still have sprung ball, summer camps, summer passing league and always -special equipment needs during this time. We have no funding for that now. We were hoping that the City of La Quinta could donate some funds for the rings, so we could keep some money in our account for the above mentioned necessities. Most all of the players paid twenty five dollars for their rings, but for some this was even too much, and if we hadn't picked up the bill they would not have championship rings. Again, we are asking the City of La Quinta to help with whatever you can to help replenish these funds. I know we take great pride in our city, and hopefully the city does us as well. After all, we did what no one else has ever done in the Coachella Valley, and that was winning back to back CIF Championships. Everyone deserved a momento of that great accomplishment. Thank fo our consideration in this matter, Dan Armstrong Head Football Coach/Athletic Director La Quinta High School Desert Sands Unified School District 04 79-255 Westward Ho Drive - La Quinta, California 92253 • (760) 772-4150 Fax (760) 772-4166 - Fax (760) 771-4171 Oho • Ic o��5w� AGENDA CATEGORY: c� OF COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: APRIL 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Demand Register Dated April 16, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Approve Demand Register Dated April 16, 2002 BACKGROUND: Prepaid Warrants: 48943 - 489801 22,243.45 489811 25,000.00 489821 660.90 48983 - 489951 2779900.71 Wire Transfers} 19316,482.64 P/R 8536 - 86111 118,602.22 P/R Tax Transfers} 28,547.46 Payable Warrants: 48996 - 491361 196879581.92 $39477,019.30 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Demand of Cash -City $19456,301.62 Demand of Cash - RDA $196,970.00 Falconer, Finance Director BUSINESS SESSION CONSENT CALENDAR STUDY SESSION PUBLIC HEARING 0 4 ,1 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK TRANSACTIONS 3/27/02 - 4/09/02 3/29/02 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS $9,542.31 3/28/02 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $60,530.00 3/28/02 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $65,000.00 3/29/02 WIRE TRANSFER - MIRA FLORES $922,849.00 4/1/02 WIRE TRANSFER - DEBT SERVICE PMT/FINANCING AUTHORITY $198,561.33 4/8/02 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $60,000.00 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT $1,316,482.64 0 415 002 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 2:11PM 04/09/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 48996 04/09/02 &01695 ECONOMY TREE & CRANE SVC 10.00 48997 04/09/02 &01696 GARY GALL 10.00 48998 04/09/02 &01697 JOHN HACKER & ASSOC 12.00 48999 04/09/02 &01698 LDR CONSTRUCTION 59.63 49000 04/09/02 &01699 KATHY ROBERTS 60.00 49001 04/09/02 &01700 ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ 5.00 49002 04/09/02 &01701 MARCLE WRIGHT 25.00 49003 04/09/02 &01702 CHANTELLE YORK 55.00 49004 04/09/02 &01703 GUILLERMO SANCHEZ 21.16 49005 04/09/02 &01704 SAE BUILDERS 219.30 49006 04/09/02 &01705 ADRIANA RAMIREZ 50.00 49007 04/09/02 ABE001 JACQUES ABELS 632.12 49008 04/09/02 ABL001 ABLE RIBBON TECH 445.97 49009 04/09/02 ALC050 BOB ALCALA 70.00 49010 04/09/02 AME175 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES 147.00 49011 04/09/02 AME200 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS 54.97 49012 04/09/02 AMS200 AMSTERDAM PRINTING 1074.76 49013 04/09/02 AND008 ANDERSON COMMUNICATIONS 290.93 49014 04/09/02 ANG100 ANGEL BAKERY 500.00 49015 04/09/02 ARC100 ARCH 440.08 49016 04/09/02 AUT030 AUTOMATED TELECOM 573.36 49017 04/09/02 AVA100 AVAYA INC 2479.60 49018 04/09/02 BER125 BERG & ASSOCIATES INC 73158.09 49019 04/09/02 BER150 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC 4003.46 49020 04/09/02 BES100 BEST BUY CO INC 75.41 49021 04/09/02 BI0100 BIO TOX 250.20 49022 04/09/02 BOG100 SHARON BOGAN 182.70 49023 04/09/02 BOU100 MICHELE BOUDREAU 50.00 49024 04/09/02 BUN100 BUNDLE BANDS 38.85 49025 04/09/02 CAD010 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 207.39 49026 04/09/02 CAL015 CALIF BUILDING OFFICIALS 215.00 49027 04/09/02 CAL060 CALIF STREET MAINTENANCE 3420.00 49028 04/09/02 CAL240 CALIFORNIA POOLS & SPAS 270.00 49029 04/09/02 CAP025 CAPITAL REALTY ANALYSTS 8000.00 49030 04/09/02 CAP050 ROSMARY CAPUTO 385.00 49031 04/09/02 CAR300 CARQUEST 72.73 49032 04/09/02 CDW050 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 24.54 49033 04/09/02 CEN010 CENTURY FORMS INC 332.46 49034 04/09/02 CLA050 CLASSIC AUTO TRANSPORT 140.00 49035 04/09/02 COA027 COACHELLA VLLY CHAP ICBO 50.00 49036 04/09/02 COA083 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 682.10 49037 04/09/02 COL020 PAT COLE 378.00 49038 04/09/02 COM015 COMPUTER U LEARNING CENTR 900.00 49039 04/09/02 COM030 COMSERCO 411.34 49040 04/09/02 COR150 CORPORATE EXPRESS 497.04 49041 04/09/02 CVA010 C V A G 25808.12 49042 04/09/02 DBX100 DBX INC 14815.15 o `t 3 003 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 2:11PM 04/09/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 2 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT 49043 04/09/02 DDP100 DD PAINTING 850.00 49044 04/09/02 DES018 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 3178.20 49045 04/09/02 DES051 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHL 269.00 49046 04/09/02 DES060 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO 262.85 49047 04/09/02 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC .4959.19 49048 04/09/02 DOU200 LES DOUGLAS 669.90 49049 04/09/02 DUM100 DUMMIES UNLIMITED INC 2638.33 49050 04/09/02 EIS010 EISENHOWER IMMEDIATE CARE 255.00 49051 04/09/02 EXP200 EXPRESS DETAIL 865.00 49052 04/09/02 FAL050 JOHN FALCONER 58.50 49053 04/09/02 FIR007 FIRST AID SELECT 145.57 49054 04/09/02 FIR015 FIRST AMERICAN REAL 141.39 49055 04/09/02 FRA010 MARNI FRANCISCO 169.33 49056 04/09/02 GAR005 GARNER IMPLEMENT CO 818.45 49057 04/09/02 GEN100 THOMAS P GENOVESE 112.00 49058 04/09/02 GE0010 GEORGE'S GOODYEAR 261.44 49059 04/09/02 GRA007 W W GRAINGER INC 131.71 49060 04/09/02 GRA010 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO 594739.87 49061 04/09/02 HAI100 HAINES & COMPANY INC 170.39 49062 04/09/02 HAR100 JOHN HARDCASTLE 175.36 49063 04/09/02 HEG050 HEGGE ELECTRICAL 80.00 49064 04/09/02 HIG010 HIGH TECH IRRIGATION INC 30.40 49065 04/09/02 HOA010 HUGH HOARD INC 2391.48 49066 04/09/02 HOM030 HOME DEPOT 1177.51 49067 04/09/02 H00050 FAYE HOOPER 100.00 49068 04/09/02 INF002 INFOCUS CORPORATION 4130.28 49069 04/09/02 INT015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 342.03 49070 04/09/02 JDD100 JDD,LLC 183645.16 49071 04/09/02 JPRO10 JP REPROGRAPHICS 63.08 49072 04/09/02 JPS100 JP STRIPING 400.00 49073 04/09/02 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 3982.05 49074 04/09/02 KRI100 BRUCE KRIBBS CONSTRUCTION 6015.00 49075 04/09/02 KUS050 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 6866.74 49076 04/09/02 LAQ040 LA QUINTA CHAMBER COMMERC 21000.00 49077 04/09/02 LAR025 LARSEN GOLF CARS 800.00 49078 04/09/02 LAS200 LA SALLE LIGHTING SERVICE 3184.20 49079 04/09/02 LAW075 LAW ENFORCEMENT LEGAL 36.50 49080 04/09/02 LES020 JANELLE LESLIE 16.80 49081 04/09/02 L00010 LOCK SHOP INC 296.36 49082 04/09/02 LOP050 RAY LOPEZ ASSOCIATES 95261.47 49083 04/09/02 LOS050 LOS ANGELES TIMES 72.00 49084 04/09/02 LOW100 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC 79.87 49085 04/09/02 LUN050 LUNDEEN PACIFIC CORP 58071.93 49086 04/09/02 MCDO10 MC DOWELL AWARDS 48.43 49087 04/09/02 MEE050 MEE INDUSTRIES INC 474.82 49088 04/09/02 MEE100 WAYNE MEEDS 100.00 49089 04/09/02 MIS100 JACKIE MISURACA 250.00 49090 04/09/02 MUN175 IRVING MUNOWITZ 210.00 49091 04/09/02 NAT075 NATIONAL ENTERTAINMENT 314.58 0 r16 LI $ ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 2:11PM 04/09/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 3 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT 49092 04/09/02 NAW010 RON NAWROCKI 2000.00 49093 04/09/02 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 14371.00 49094 04/09/02 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 1909.64 49095 04/09/02 OLI100 OLINN MESSAGE CENTER 102.95 49096 04/09/02 PAR125 RACHEL PARRISH 25.20 49097 04/09/02 PCM050 PC MAGAZINE 39.97 49098 04/09/02 PIT100 NOEL PITTMAN 392.00 49099 04/09/02 RAL050 RALPHS GROCERY CO 25.80 49100 04/09/02 RAS035 CHARLOTTE RASHMI-GRAFF 427.00 49101 04/09/02 RBF100 RBF CONSULTING 3463.44 49102 04/09/02 RES005 RESERVE ACCOUNT 4000.00 49103 04/09/02 RIG025 JEAN RIGGS 147.00 49104 04/09/02 RIV080 RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH 5575.00 49105 04/09/02 RIV095 RIVERSIDE CNTY REGIONAL 2500.00 49106 04/09/02 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS 263623.31 49107 04/09/02 RIV101 RIV COUNTY SHERIFF/INDIO 830.97 49108 04/09/02 RIV140 RIVERSIDE CNTY SURVEYOR'S 20.00 49109 04/09/02 SAX100 SAXON ENGINEERING SERVICE 1995.00 49110 04/09/02 SCI100 LOUISE SCIUTTO 120.00 49111 04/09/02 SKI051 SKILLPATH SEMINARS 199.00 49112 04/09/02 SMA010 SMART & FINAL 207.67 49113 04/09/02 SOU004 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 191.11 49114 04/09/02 SOU007 SOUTHWEST NETWORKS, INC 4468.75 49115 04/09/02 SOU033 SOUTHERN CAL ASSOC CODE 120.00 49116 04/09/02 SOU100 SOUTHLAND GEOTECHNICL INC 11732.00 49117 04/09/02 STA010 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT 38643.00 49118 04/09/02 STA045 STAN'S AUTO TECH 305.62 49119 04/09/02 STE008 FRANK STEIN NOVELTY CO 160.45 49120 04/09/02 ST0100 STORIGHT SYSTEMS LTD 107.50 49121 04/09/02 SUS075 JEAN SUSMAN 422.80 49122 04/09/02 TER010 TERRA -CAL CONST INC 153895.00 49123 04/09/02 TRE100 JUAN TREVINO 275.00 49124 04/09/02 TRIO10 TRI LAKE CONSULTANTS INC 22975.00 49125 04/09/02 TRU010 TRULY NOLEN INC 30.00 49126 04/09/02 TTI100 TTI NATIONAL INC 7.98 49127 04/09/02 ULT150 ULTRA -RESEARCH 18.00 49128 04/09/02 UND010 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 65.00 49129 04/09/02 VAL020 VALLEY PLUMBING 218.43 49130 04/09/02 VER050 FREDRICO VERDUGO 275.00 49131 04/09/02 VIP100 V I PEOPLE INC 1799.44 49132 04/09/02 VIS100 VISIBLE COMPUTER SUPPLY 85.15 49133 04/09/02 WAL010 WAL MART COMMUNITY 87.47 49134 04/09/02 WES009 WEST COAST TRANSPORTATION 525.00 49135 04/09/02 W00100 DEBBIE WOODRUFF 343.57 49136 04/09/02 XER010 XEROX CORPORATION 6940.07 CHECK TOTAL 1,687,581.92 04 005 .--i N M C' r-1 lO CV w LO lO 1- CO Ol dw N Ln N lO N r- N O N O H z al O \ H C x U (M M M M M M M M ('M M O W C7 H (� O I, O O V O d O C O C O O O O O Cl C' O Cw O C O Cv W H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H Ha r1 O O O 0 0 M O O O O lO 0 0 0 0 r-I E-H O O O Vw O N O O O O ri 00 O Ln O ,-+ z w H z O O N M l0 O O N . 10 N O O �+ O O r1 H H N M l0 N Ln N I- O H a O O O O O O (M l0 O O O O O O O (D lO ri (Y W O fY W O r 1 fZ W N a, Px a tZ a4 aU-) Ql O (Y. Ln Ln H r 1 (N CL a Cu fZ a. a W O O O w W W > O W W W W U) O O O H O O O w H a H a H H H H H H H H CY. W HHy E-4-4 5�H H Cl) CO co a a o W W (ali co w< a U) w a FC U) w a FC w a w a w a a F4 a r� Cl) W< a a F. a FC Q a F:4 w as w a w a cn W z O z H H O z H H O z H H O 0 0 0 E-1 O U] U) H O z H H O U) U) H O U) U) H O W U) H O 0 0 0 z H W H H cn H U) H 0 Q Q E 1 Kc H cn H E-H F:� U H D H A Q Q cA IU, O w H uOq cZ O W a O x� O w CQ m 04 O U a O x x O U C 4 O a O z O m CQ x Q Q Q Q Ca Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q z H U Co z Q z W z n z w z D z w z O z �:) z O z W z D z W z D z w z Q z W z O z w z =) z w z �D z Q�:) z z n W Q Ga W > 44 W > Ga W > Gu W W W 44 W > Ga w > Ga w > Ga w > Cu W 9 Ga W > 44 W 44 W CH w Ga W cn x Cz a x x a x a a x x a x a a W w U w to �Q tO c v v H Q O a' W Ol CM al M Ol M Cil M al M Cif M 1 z > z Q x N lO 00 I ('M I M i M 1` to I- m N (Y) N G1 (M lM M H Q H H �:) z N Ln O tlo M M O N O N O N N U') C' Ln m LO I- IS O N O N O N Q H x N d' r-i O O O H M r 1 r 1 N O O O z a F:� w w ro x I O O w H Cz O O O m o o O O O O r OD 0 0 0 w O O O ,-+ O O O O O o r 4 O O O CQ x O O O m O O O O O O M M O (D O 7 lO lO w 0) 00 H 00 lO O0 I` (M dl 00 H lO z r1 r I r 1 M r1 a N M r I qw m M C' d' C' m C' '-i V' N qw H z O O O Vr O CP O O Cr O O w O O O O O O O D O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U U r-i r-I r1 O .--I O O 0 0 0 O O O O (D o C 0 0 U W z U M O O O U U] N N O O O x (y La E1 E1 H V) H E + GY z 1 W W a U D U D U D H W CL' Q x 0 O F4 U) m 04 m w m 124 w w W H C� H a W x 04 H 0Z H 0� H W W O Cz H Ix W O W Q W Q w Q w Q a z m H >+ a U < M z U) z cn z O C4 O a a a H a H a H a H 4 Q x 0 x 0 0 0 H W W W D Q Q D < °I a z >� z U U U x w u z a m m oo w 04 rt a O Cl O o4 x O w n a Q rx Ca H m a o4 rt x H �::> w <<F:4< w w w H w z O w > w Ln c7 l0 h I` a OD a 00 a 0o CIl r>; O r-+ U N C7 M m C' cn C' cn V' cn C' p O >+ rn w rn w m w m LO m w m LIO rn w O r Cl I` O I` O r O r O 1` O I` O I` U H Ci H '-+ O r-I O r-i O H O r1 O r1 O r-1 O r-i O r1 O r-1 O ra O r-1 O � O H O r-1 r ` /R r'� O �V! C f f� U W �t3 W W W 0 W a a W W La LM Vd 006 z .--I N (M V O Lf) I N l0 I- 00 (M C>1 O O H z N 0 Cil O \ N x .:ZrU N LO a) L M Ln M (M Ln Lo LO (M Ln U) O w H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (D Fc i 'W I C' C' V' V' C' Vw C' Cw Cv VT W W V 0Q E4 E-+ H E 4 H E+ H H H H H H H H a c O N lM v O O O 00 00 (M 0 0 1` ' E-+ O r i (3) O O O C) C r-1 .--1 O1 O O N z H . W z O N Ln O O I: C Cil ri O O O N x A u7 (n 00 C' Lr) N C' O m O V' (`') >I O l0 N ri r1 N l0 N N UI V a O M CD O r-I 01 O O O O M O O 0 O Cl O N ri U) U) M C' C' Ln m O V' N a l0 d' -4 O N Ln C' H z z z z U) W FC U a W nG W W >+ A a H rl U a a �l a a W W a W 4 4 a FC H H H H U H < x a m U) U) U) (Y4 H U D H a a w a w a CO U) a o a a a z z z a < a z a > a a O H O O O W w 0 H O C7 O O W W W O W O z 0 U) 0 W a A A A �4 A H H A U 0 z A 0 a a a A A FC A A z U z z z w z a a z a z H z z z o z z a z w H U) W D W > W a a W a W x W U) W >+ >+ >+ w H W ]C W W W z W > Ga > > D D> Z > 0> 0 H > H H H > > o > 0> xA U) E+ CO U) H CU U U U N a a W 44 U W r1 rn H A a -4 r-i lD -4 M M 0 W 11 M '-i N O 110 N I > Cn M l0 N O O (n 00 l0 C O O z z x l0 w r-I 0) 00 r-I (M ri l0 N l0 H A H •A d' 00 m M ri 00 Ul O l'M N N H z N 4 1-1 r-1 M (M C' M l0 M A r1 ri ri r 1 r-1 Ln Ln L r a 0 H x a z a r.0 a4 w cn a O O w EE+ a (� O O O N 110 N N N O I- O O W LO O OD O m 00 M N N N 0 Ljr) l4 to CL1 V O U7 O Ul Ln l0 00 OD OD Ln l0 l0 lfl A [� t� Ci> ri 01 01 CIl M M M Cil M Lf) N z M M O O O O O V V 0 w M M C' l0 l0 110 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 H z O '-i ri ri N r-i N M M M .--I rA fM M A O O 0 Ln O O O O O O O Ul U) U7 O O (M ('M N M N H -i r-I M N r-I -4 U U r I r 1 ri ri r I ri r i ri r-I ri r-I r-I ri ri rC O 1-4 o r-i 0 r--1 o r-i O r-1 o r1 0 0 0 o O o 0 (D U) W U) cn U) U z a > O U) H z H M o U a z z z U O 7. F-I U H H 1-A H 0 u) N U U U) Ga H H H z U a w w W z H z z z w H H a n x a a >+ w a a a o x Q 2 m � 2 0 iW-1 U) POGO 1--i H U < a M C) cl O CA H z W a s au a a a a U) >+ O ft, D < H H W w w a a < a H O w w a a H H H w w x o a a O a U h a s w W W m U) U) A 0 U E-H CO z m H rJ4 W z O > Ul -A -4 -1 O Ln O O 0 O 00 O O o r:) O 0 O O Ui r- O O O O O O O M O >+ 1- O O O (D ri N N N N O r I r -i O U H r-I w a s U w w U) U) U) A U H 007 z r1 C N M C U) l0 1- OD al O U) la -1 I- 00 r-i r-i r-I ri ri r-I r-I r-i r-I ri N r-I r-i N r-I ri O H z N O al O \ M x Cl w H O O O O Cl O O O O O O Cl O O O Cl U FC Vr C C T IT C' cro C C C C C C C C m E-+ Hp H H H H HP H E+ E-H E-H HE-4 H H a �1• •• al O ao N N a) O O l0 .-1 O O O U) N O .--i E+ O l0 O0 C O O W N N C' N I- O O V' O H z H w z r I al O al 10 10 U7 N r 1 O N O W lfl N x ❑ lfl N M l0 w U) 00 U7 m l0 N >+ O U) T O al M U) N 1- (N H N r-I a) lO O v M a N r I . I r-i lO Cl m w I O O O U) M w O V cM N [� O OD M Ol H H H H H 00 M L w O N O O 1` 1` > > > > > U) O H U1 OD (7 U7 M U) V' r-i O N z N W W W W W cM c �4 H < < < < < x x x x x x O H a, a a a a U O U) a Iz-i a U > U > U > U > U > a U U a w a \ a a U a z a rC rr+ m m 0 cn m < > > K� F < ❑ rC �C U FC z H H H U) U) H H O E+ H > H a H O a 0 a 0 PPPPPO O U O 00 O cn O a O w H H H H E-H z z z z z H `.4 `.4 H H �-1 H L4 EH H H U H M x x x E E U U a W O >+ rZ H a 01 a 01 rZ (7 0 0 0 0 0Z w W rZ x a a H rZ H rZ O z U) co O H W O W O x x� x x O x x 0 O O F-4 O U O H O 44 O x x a ❑ ❑ ❑ U U❑ U❑ ["0 no z❑ ❑ a s z U w z w z H H H H H z z z H z a z D z U) z O O H rn z w z W m m W m cn w z z w W W rZ W H W W ❑ w Bu 44 W O> O> z z z z z> < < > ❑> w> co >> z> H H ❑ x x o O O O o as O x z o z z cn a a U U U U U a s U U) H U W D D W w U w N r-I H ❑ 04 v N o O w N I- M V' U7 l0 1` N O I > m O H r-i .--I r-I r-i ri U) l0 M N l0 w z z x '-q M I 1 I I I C N C N N I- 1- H ❑ H "..D N r-i O O O O O d' IT U) M H U) U) U) H z M O O O O O C IT U) N U d' r-I r-I ❑ O N al a) m 01 dl N N 0'1 O O V T H ,4 a < m w w a 1 O o w E1 rZ O OD O O O O O r I- (M l0 N O O O O w w O O O O O (D U) U) N O 0) O O O O W lD l0 O O O O O U) tf) O0 U) U) O O O O z (M O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O r I ri l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 lO r- l0 l0 Lf) l� l0 l0 E-H z (M (M M M M lM ('M N N (N ri N r♦ r 1 (M cM ❑ U) U) l I- t- I- 1` U) U) U) O (D U) U7 U) U) O IA r1 l4 lfl lfl l4 lfl cM (M l'M N N M C IT U U .-1 .--I ri ri '-i r-I r-i r-I r-I 'A '-4 r-I -4 -1 r-i -4 rt+ O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O IT C' r-i r-i r-i r-A ri r-i r-I ri r-i U U H H z z z z z >+ >+ H H H H H 4 a a s o z cn cn cn cn cn Q< Cl o w w w w w 00 x an U) U H H H H H H H U U) cn a w z z z w w U U U U U x x z ❑ U) z r4 I H 0 0 0 0 0 O < D ❑ O O rC cn cn cn cn �a w U CD O z w 44 W E-+ ❑ U C!) cn cn cn cn O m < H H a FC r>r FC z z 04 q CH H H D m ?C O z w a w a 0 s H a x< Q w w z >4 a H a rC O H < 1:4 rZ 124 a s a rz Cl) O r>r U z ❑❑ a ❑ D > w w w w w w w w H x H n U) z FCC w C s w w m m w cn m U) E CQ U U H r.4 W z 0 > o o Un Ln 0 LO un o 0 o O O o 0 CO 0 ❑ O �H M O O r i N r-1 N ri N H N .-1 N r-I U) r-I U) r-I O r-i O r-i O r-I O r-I O r-I r-1 O -1 r 4T O U H H FC rZ rZ rZ rZ rZ rZ z (J) O C7 D z ❑ ❑ U H > w w w w w W W W H O O n J C O ri N M 01 0 Ln ih lD M 1- M OD M 0) M pG H O z N O Ol 0 \ �r � x U Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln ur) Ln Ln Ln Ln (M M u) Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O W 0 H Q O V' O C' O V• O C O V' O V' O C' 0 V' O C' O Vw O T O -T O C' O V' O V' O T O V' O V' a 04 E-1 E-1 H H H HP E-1 E+ E+ H HE-4 H H H E-1 H •• H zH. OD O OD O . H w . O N O O O O O O O (DO O O (D O O O O M [- l0 CC)M N r-1 1- Lo OD Ln OD w x z D 1- 1` OD r- l0 N LO 1-1 O N O 0 Cl O O (M O O 0 Cl Ln OD N lO O N OD l0 (M (M • >+ W(MOD O N V r 1 .--1 1 .--I O M M N I 0) M O O O O O Cl O O O O (M V Ln r O x U) Ln ri o N o 1` H H o O Lr> OD cv r- V N N OC, W N V' M N z D O oD (M n: W � U H fx W C7 W > U) O a FC r I C7 a O x U a < v? a FC z H< 4 H z H z H z H z< �-1 U< a a < ra 1 < U) A U) A U) A z O H o U) a E-H o a W H o H F 1 H H H o W a E-H 0 a H 0 W H E-H o H O f� U Z U z U W H U O O a H mm x x mw x E a O r-a a 0 (f) Pl O z H z H z H z H 124 O < U) a O U a O H a O W W a O co U) U) U) U) U) x U1 x 0 rz 0 rz 0 rz 0 A < A H A rC < r!r A H A D A A W W A W W W H C) w H H H H W > W z W > W 0Y W > z D z D z D z D w > a w > E-+ U) W > < A W > z ""> z w H U) H U) H M U) A z D z z D z w z H U) O Gd O 44 O 44 O 44 a z Z a rz a D co D ro D PU W U w w M H O A 6Y W OD V' Ln N O r-1 N > z I > z CO 2: V' Ln N M Ln Ln Ln Ln O N V• N N m M OD OD N I M I- M C OD O OD O 00 0 H A H H D z Ln M N Ln Ln (Y) U) M Ln V' O ri C 1-1 N O M ri I N O ri Ln z r- a H ri A V V V v M N N N N O 44 Cu Ln Ln Ln a � w a4 m 1 a O O H w a w O O O O O O O O O O l0 r 1 O O 0 O O 0 M O O N m 01 O O O O O O I- 1:31 r V• pq E o o O O O o O C) o Ln o O o OD OD D z r-I r-1 —i ri V N O O m O 0) (D N 0) 0) 0 0) M O M O I- V (M O M O H lfl l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 1p lfl l0 1p l0 �O lD f� f� l0 I� l� z D [— Ln 1— L() M Lo V Ln ri Ln M U) -T to C U) 0 r- 0 N O N O —4 O ri Ln r-I Ln N O (M Ln V' Ln O U M M V V' (M V V C V M 0) N Ln ri C V V U < .--1 o r A ri 0 -1 1-1 0 ri H 0 r 4 r-I 0 -1 e--i 0 ri r-i 0 ri r-1 0 1-1 r-I 0 -A r-I 0 -4 Ln Cl C' 1-4 0 ri ri o Ln ri O -4 -1 O r-i r-I o -4 r-I 0 r-i r l 0 r-I U) < w z < < < < H >+ >+ >+ r H U < z a m a m a m a m m >-4 (M a4 a as a Ga EW-1 w Lb W Kc U U o O a a D a D a t24 O z H U) U) U) U) z < z H z H U z U z U z Ln a U) to u) U) U O O O O > I O H H H H H H as 00+ a s 4 D w w U S E 1 < O G4 O G4 O w O w A a W w < < < 4 < W a < z� z z O O a: O W 4 H z H z H z F-1 z H z H D cz H . z H z H z H z z U H a W s W w w w pq 4 H D D D D D m (n rz O z O C4 O Ix O a < >+ a U) w > O > O >+ a >1 x >+ x >+ < a a H W H w H W H W w F-I w H w H w H Ga H 114 H H H D OI 0 U D H D H D H a< rl O A OQQO < < < 14 1-1 rC a a a ri a rt a a < U) O z < 3 A 3 A z W z w z W U) H 44 z w U U U U U U U U U U U x U U U U U U z 0 > o r-1 0 r-I 0 -4 0 .--1 Ln r-i o lD O C O V' o V o V' Ln N O Ln o O 0 Ln 0 Ln 0 r 4 Cl r-1 0 r1 O U >+ H O O O O O O N N N N O a 0 a M o4 O 3 O 3 O z O z O z < U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U �Jt� 009 z O .-1 N M d' Ln m at rl N l0 r M v' N tD r m m O f.� -w w Vw a' V' v' N N N N v' d' N N N N N N (14 M p[ O E z N O m O N d' U Ln ur) Ln N N L() to Ln M M u) to M M M M M M M M o w F O o 0 0 0 O o o O o o O o o o 0 0 0 o O C7 < c c -v c c c c c a c c c c -T c £ a 00 E E E+ F E E H E F E F+ El E. F E. E F+ E+ F F H v rl 10 C C O O O O O O M H N m O m O N O H H r dT C cr O O O 1-4 O O N rl cr M m M O O O O Z E w z o1 10 m m O N m O N m N l0 V' l0 Q1 r N r E D to C M M �o r N m r O v' lQ m <T u-) N N rl l0 i+ O l0 M Q) rl N H H 1p rn W N �o 0 0 0 o O <r c Cw O O H O O M O N O O N m O H r y1 M mil' to m r (D H 0% x M H to M Ol ci' d' W FRC 7�: O E a o u) x q q ❑ ❑ FC z z r.0 D < FC FC FC FC r.0 z fZ a P'. 7. E H H F q F E F E+ F+ cn m F F+ O O r� r� FC RC O S 3 0 O W O O O E El O 0 x W H U U U U F O O E W E F z E. Z E-E a 04 C: E-E E O F F El H z O O < FC a H 04 co cn cn U) a. c4 x R; O Z F+ oG EH z a a a a) U co (n cf) cn to o; O O H cn cn cn cn O W W O co O cn O U O U O O W W W W W W W O z U z z z z z U U z W z W z 00G z a 2 �� z a a a a a a a z < H cn H H H H W H H W CO W Ga W F w E w z z W 0+ w a, w a a a w H w cn cn cn cn > x x> E> w> co > m> > a a a a a a a, > a q D D D D w W w W z z H H D D D D D D D W co W 00 0q oa > > S_. h H H cn co m m m m m m m FC W Ga U W N O M Q1 Ol M M m m 1-I q fx 1r O lO O m m m N N 0 W r m r �o w Ln Ln m m > I > W m m rl H N H M m m Ln O H l0 Qo m m r z z E O O m m O M fM N N r M r M (`') N N v H q H D C T to ID uN w O O m a) o m m O O N H z H H a) o) l0 (y) M O O H o O r-I H O ❑ u7 Lo N Ln H ri .-i O O M M M M M M M O c z W rL w w as x 0 o o w E a. O O N O at CT O M N N O O O O O O .--I N O W O O O d' (D Ln a1 m m O O O O (D (Dc CQ O O u) N O l0 "o l0 O � u) � to T) O O O O w m m O kO D cD r 41 D> D> O1 01 r1 (`") H M M z cw) o c` 0 o H c c)% o C) 0 o C) O o 0 (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 cD c) 0 r r io co w co �o w co co co �o �o co r r r r r r r �o E-E z N H H H H H H m N N N H w N M M D Ln u7 O Ln O o Ln m o O O O O O T) O N N O O O v' M M M ul N M �o N N (y) M N C' C N H N 1n U U H H H rl rl H H rl H -1 H rV rl H 1-4 1-1 rl 1-1 1-4 N FZ� O o 0 o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O H rl rl H In ) rl Vw rl rl rl rl 1l rl H H rl rl rl to 0 0 u) a I W z PQ H � a a w a a cn z E C+4 w z O > a O >+ U H � U z z z z H H H H a 0 a 0 O O O O El E- 5 5 F E E F U U U U 0 0 0 0 r1 rl H 0 0 0 0 W W W W U U U U E E+ a a O O a a E- E- F E 0 0 El D U U H H m m a a U U 0 0 N N 0 0 a a U U w a O U F a 0 N 0 a O U W E z w U U z z a w a a a w E D a O U rl 0 0 U a a a a a a a a as a1 a w w w w w w w w w w O O E E F E F E F as 0000000 W w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U U 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M N N N N N N N 0 o r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U U 0010 z r-1 OD M M Vl0 v�o r 00 w 0) -w (� m lD d' u7 M M M m m N u) (M M Ln cy) O E Z N O O) O \ to x C U (M LO m Lo if) u) u) v) M m m M u) u) m in N (M O W E O O p O O O O O o O O o O o o O O O U Fl; V' V' C' C' V' V' V' cI' C V' C' V' a' a` C C' Fy W a) E. El ElE+ E E E El El El El El E+ ElE 4 El a N u) O N m m l0 Ol O u) Ol M H O O O m O f-I E H .-i O N H O O r O m N N m m O z E W Z H N o H «) r m O 0) N lO lO r m N r m u) £ D .-+ Ln �o o <r m r w to m in o r rn r m u) >+ O H m m Q' ri m d' N N N N r m u7 to N rL4 N Ln O O O Ln d• p M 1l ri O N O cD r-1 Q1 M ri m O m Ol (N 0) Ol Z m U) M O r-I Ln r l0 LO to \0 < m a \ m Z m m r-I N N al l0 x w N Ln O a' M v' N V I U z EF 2 W a to a H a a a co a a a U a E FC z < < < FC u) FC ❑ FC FC F(; \ < z z o FF O E aL EE E a E < E V U U U El E E-E E W O \ O U O O O < O O >>>> O O x 0 £ W H O El\ E W F F F E+ E F CO U) U) U) E-E 04 o. E E+ >+ U E+ .-I z U z z O O z O H 04 a. O (4 z a a w a w Q' EE E F+ E+ Z E+ E % x % a O H to o H O w O o a o £ O u U u Fug O v u o O o a > 0: w Q E C.0 Q ❑ m m m m m ❑ ❑ >' Q P: z rD =) z h z W r -E El U z z z z E+ E E EZ a. z O z H N (Ij w W W x w x x x x x w H w a W El F E E W E E+ W CO w W < > E. > 0L > C7 C7 0 0 0 > D > W > z z z z > U) m > £ > W ❑ W W Kc H H H H H O £ 0 0 0 0 z z D a m Fe a w a a a a a w w U u U U H H z a w w 0 H O N y„ p I I I I I M M O W I N r I c O (N to U) U) I > I > co m 1p M V' lO rV n 1 M U U 41 z z £ M 0) Ln C .--I r d' N O u7 O l0 lO O r-I H Q " D r-i C M N 0) m M O 00 m M O O ri r-I H z rl N ri rl f-1 m m Vw In w l0 r O Q Q o r o W o to lO to H x FC z w m ro a I O o 0 E L1' u7 (M O r r r O O r O N N O O W d' u) O R' C V' O O u) O m M m O m 0) oD O u) LO O m m m O O l0 O Ln In to O u7 N LO O D Ln 0) ri m m M M m (+) m in in io M 0) 0) 0) m z O O N O O O O O w C O O O O O O (D O EllO to w r r r r r lO lO Ln u) u') w 1p w w l0 z m M rl 'r V' 'QT r r ri C' '-1 ri CM r-I (14 04 D O O In in ul u) u) to ul O LO u7 u) Ln O O O O O r r N C C' C M M N N N m N M .--I U U N r-1 �-1 r-I f-1 •-1 rl r-I r-I r-1 r-I rl H .� H r-I '-V .-� Fl; m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N d' .--I rl ri r-1 H r-I �-i .-I ri r-I ri H ri •-i rl ri W a U U a a a a a aD D w z w a w :D H zH wE D D H x o cn m in m m w m q 0 'n U U V U U z a z z z z E W a H H H H H D Qj H H H H H £ F E El F E-E In W v] w m m C7 U U U U U Q W W W Oa U) U) a KC z w w W w w z z ££££ 4< z a4 W E H a a a a a D W W W W a .a D W 14 Ez-I V W W W W W U) co ElElEl E0 0 C7 Z 3 >+ 01 H H F E+ El E E+ El E-E E+ El DO W Ox r4 a a. z P4 a 0: a z Q' a ❑ Q H Z < x a w w w w w w W w w w w a FC O > x v) m m v) m m cn U) cn m m m W co wn a ❑ ❑ W w w W W W W W w w W W w- D H m z ❑ ❑ ❑ Q Q o Q Q ❑ ❑❑ Q❑ a s Q w E Gi W z 0 > o 0 o m m m m m o v) n Lou") o o 0 0 O >+ O rl H O O O O O O O O O O O N N U E FC x a co In m U) m m m m (1) m cn D D £ i U H > CQ ❑ w w w w w w W W w w w O O D H FC U U Q Q Q Q ❑ Q Q ❑ ❑ Q O ❑ Q Q O ❑ W 0011 z F� p O r N m N O V• 0) N O l0 H l0 N 1Q H m N Ln w V' l0 to w r �0 N F z O O r x U Ln cD M Ln u1 CD LO m Ln M LO Ln t.f) u7 O W U < F FC Gq o d' El o V' El O V' H O p O V' E. o V' E C. -IT F O -ITC' F o E o C' H O qvR' E O E O V' H O C' E c .-+ E z F 0 o . 0 o . o u) . Ln Ln . o o . N o . rn m . M m . Ln c . o co . o . a' . r . m r . w x >+ z D O Ln N w O V' e W Ln cn Ln O) l0 m N H d' tT to W fi W O Ln N to t0 N M .� H a 0 0 o r rn m Ln O c 0 Ln ul o 1� l0 Ln 00 Ln Ln Ln a' m H C m m to c W H o N r-I c l0 N r M ri a FC F F a a FC a FC w w a FC a <H x a FC U' a Ff. a < a FC W O H O E+ H H El O E-E O El O F FC ❑ O E O E-E P, W O E-E z H E H E+ O E O F cn 0 F rUi 0 W H a 0 w w a 0 w a 0 O W W W a o D a 0 w a 0 x Z 0 w ££ w cz 0 a 0 < m a o to w > z Ri u ❑ z a U a U ❑ z 0 FC ❑ z H a H a H a ❑ z a w ❑ z 0 FCC ❑ z 0 E ❑ z x x ❑ z cn ❑ z x ❑ z H a H [n w w > H x H x> w w .a w > a, w w w a, a. W > U a> w W a>> W U w U z U z> w w a>> w cow a a co ❑ W >> W H £ D M U co D rn FC CL H £ F D a D s H E. F D Ln W G U W I -I ❑ p; a M fz N N 0 > I z > z W W £ M 1� LO r O LO LO Ln LO Ln Ln O LO N FC £ I N to r 0 H C r 0) H ❑ H ❑ H D z c to V' N l0 C O O m O O M O O M O C. (N 02 w Cu 0) O W o r-I C' fM 0) m 0) r H Y, a < w w w a I O 0 w E. oG w W M v Lo m c Lo o o o m W o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 rn c �o o O 0 o o o rn Lo r W r W D z 0) H O) H H cn C. M O m O (3) O H Ol H r M r M O) M O M O F io w r r r o 0 w Io ID 0 o r r z O O ,) O LO C) LO LO Lf) LO H Ln m M Ln LO V' C N C Ln u) M H LO N H LO LO N O H N O H O c) u"J V• u1 v M Ln a' U U FC o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o 0 o O Ln Ln + r Ln H Ln H 0 U M a a 0 U z 0 H o Ln H U H U Ela U O E+ z w w w w > 0 0 >+ ❑ H (� E KC FC F w FC F w w z 0 w cn w m w (n U H a H U z w a a z w 0 z w U 0 0 CD a w U cn z 0 w H a z a w IZ4 H H H w H a AJ u) z 0 a >+ d m W w w F E+ H E+ H x w cn w w U w 0 H H <a cL < o ❑ o; VL4 a a z x m (Y cn a. m ai m Qr z Q z ((Y 0 0 x 0 i zz a E G4 W x W x w 0 �D H G+ H G. H f=.L H 1-4C7 FC x F x E w (D 3 C7 z 0 D > o o 0 o o Ln r o r 0 r o LO H o H Lr) O O O o o o .H r o o O >+ U H N x N x O FC O HHH O O O H O O FC H w H w O W O O < U W w Cu Gu Ga Cu Cu Cu C.� C7 u 0 r �- 0 0012 z m M O H N m O1 Ln to r v' Ln Lo r m m r.0 �o ID r r o c v c r O F Z N O rn O \ m vl x U Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln m M m m m m m m M m m m m M m OW H O O O O o O o o O O O O O O O O O O O O Q El E E-E E ElE. E.F+ E+ El E E El F F E El W H m O LO H O of N v' O O m m 01 N m N Ln N O m .--� H H O N r O M O N r m to m O N H z E W x z a l0 to v' ri LO M M m Ln r O r v' N O m O M .-1 m r r r O N M Ln N N H O m r-1 of O O O M ?1 0 rn r r m r-+ m u') m -i K. r N Ln Co H N Pa m N N a N N r rn o o m o m M M O 7 7 Ln O (n Cn H 0) CD Ln a4 O CDH r O H W m U r r X m m Ol r O E z z CO r > ,-+ O M •-1 o] H O 0 w v (n V N U) m < m U a. R'. Lo U H H 44 Cwi.i > o z x x h h w a w a a m a a a a a H 134 a \ \ 1 RC o < \ < < < FC o z z z z E H F+ E+ CO E+ H F F E+ 01 O z z 0 0 0 0 Q O o a 0 O o o O w W H O O H H H E F+ ElH E+ El El ElO; El\ U F+ El E EE E-E W < z 0 a H 44 U U U U U (z E a a W oz Cn a H% U m m w W (n m a H% O O H D D D D D O 0 0 W W O w 0 W O O w w w W W W W 0 U O EE > w (1: a a. a. a. Q U Q U 0 ❑ fz Q H Q Q H H H H H H H ❑ D ❑ U H E+ E+ E+ H z Z < < Z z . z z 11 " .a a a .a .7 z LL' z W HU to W m z m z m z m z cn z W > W O W > W a W a W > U W W > (7 L W W > U < W > al aL a. P. 0.. G4 W W W 04 [L [L CL 04 W > E+ U)> w h O Q 0 0 0 0 0 O H H a D U) U v u u v v w m x m m (n (n m (n H a w w U W H ❑ a. Ell w \\\ r to r N N N O w m r m m m r H N N v' M Q1 M Ol O m > I > W H .--4 H 1-1 H L.n Ln Ln v' m to to Ln O O CO r z z X Ln Ln v v' Ln N m r N 1-1 H O N N H H H C] H n Ln Ln Ln Ln Lo r Ln to H N ri ri N N N - C. H z N N N N N v' O M v' O O O O H H H o Q N N N N N .-1 H Ln m L-i H rl Ln r r H N H ,Y, FC Z a .0 w w a 1 1 0 o w H p: m M m O M (M O O O O O O r r H r Ln r N O W Ln Ln Ln O Ln N O O O O O O C v' M v' N a' m m pj Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln m O O O O O O m m 110 m m m Ln Ln O Ol O1 01 O O) m r r H 01 L-i O1 M m H M M m 01 01 z 0 0 0 H O 0 m m N O N O O O N O O O O O to ID Lo to to r LO to l0 l0 to to r r Lo r r r l0 l0 H z m Ln m m m N Ln Ln H v' r v' m v' m m m d' N H 0 r r m m r Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln o Ln Ln Lo Ln o 0 0 LO O 19 to to m M m N v` m v' v' v' v' v' v' IT N M U U H H H H H H F:� CDOOOO O 00 O 0 O O O O O O O O O O v' v' v' v' v' H .-� L-1 L-1 rl H •-i H rl .-1 f-1 H H H .-� 0 0 0 0 0 H M O H O H O H O H O H z H 0 H z 0 o o a a w z w w < F�4 E H E E H 04 EE H H a z O < rn z O m z O U] z O (n z O m z O F. 0 U m < U (n < U a H U a H H ❑ H H H H H H F a w w a O W H a z U U U U U w ❑❑ a Z w a x u: < O as O w O w O a, O as O a, O a, a O U m H W W W W w E, rL x FC x W W E+ O x W ❑ W ❑ w ❑ w ❑ w ❑ w ❑ W ❑ O x co N a < a a o H z H z H z H z z W z a z 0 z 0 W 0 w x H x w w 00 w w 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w as U 0 z M z 0 a 0 0 0 0 x h �] x �" x x x x x x x x w H F+ w W z O > O O O .-1 O O H O O H O O H O O -4 CD O O O O a% O O O Ln 0 O 1-1 0 O H < O m O M O m O O m O O M x O M O M z O Ln oE N � 9 9 a F�4 < 0 xxSSx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <U x x x x x x x x x x H 0013 01 CF) O Q1 H N M - O H N M In to r C - n a Ln Ln Ln Ln 1- r Ln uO ui [x O H Z N O 0 O rn v x U Co M M m (+) M M M m m m m M M M O W F O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O d' a m H H H E. El H H H E H H P H F H El F cr M �D m o rn�D o O O o -w o 0 0 0 H H O O [� N O O O O 1h O O O N H z 41 H z N N M O O O in O m M O O V' x D c C ID O C M O [- O O to O O m i1 O M H m O ri N lD V' cr O m H M M N M M M 1-1 M a m N N m H 'D co O Ln O d' O O N O H O O O O I, O O O N W 1n M O QG N ❑ Ln w Cu O O ID O O m H H to `-' O O S m co o m H O m co M N M \D �D Z H a N `.4 D I z FG' H a a x w U v a a F co ❑ 0 0 a w a a a H a > x a -<� a .a F a a FC U rC &A C KC co C H W KC a U < < H F+ < U < a KC z F z H Z E+ F+ F H Z E+ v) H a E+ O O H F W H U O W O W O O C7 O U U H O z❑ W O x O O a 0 W H E-E CG H x H El z H FC z< E H z U; E E H H E H W a 44 [4 v) c4 a x Q� C7 m W c4 H x C7 z tz O fx a cZ (D O H O W O D: O O a O z H cz O z z O W m O U O FC O Z > x ❑ a❑ D❑ m ❑ 4❑ H H ❑ W Z H❑ 11 Q❑ ❑ u❑ H z U z z m z E z a, z a x x z E D EH Z a, 0, z r z z H H co w ow E w z w W o w u w D w x W H H W .4w w W x w > ❑> H> H> U> a> > z m"> a D a ac� ❑ a w a O❑ 0 .7- H a Cl H o H m m D: a x U a w w a a W w U W O H ❑ R N o w > I > m C O O o) H x C N u) u) Ol z z X (N O N m c ID U to I- m m of H O H D N d' rl a) I- m (4 lD U ID N w H z M rn o c c rn ul .-1 H ul c rn ❑ M M ri Ql r-1 H H In Z a KC m w m x 0 1O F O O O M H H N O M O O o O (Dw W O O O N N N N O LnO m m m cM O O m O O O Ln m m m O Lf) O N in ul O O 5 rti ul I- 01 N Lr) Ln H 0) M D> 0) Ln H H Z LO 1D O O O O N O O O O O N N I ko ko �o �o �o w E N M .-1 H M O M V' f-1 rl M rl H D Ln H O I- Lr) u) O .-1 I- N O O O N ul O M N N H r ID C M M ri N N U U O < O o 0 0 0 0 o I- o 0 0 o O o O N a w z z z 0 0 0 U U W H H H E H E > � 114 m w w w w a a a moo 0 z mmm zz a 0 o O FC KC <O H H Ln U O O m cz H a H a a a U U U m m < E a w U F4 w w m m m << x z 0 comm MOM z z U w H o w z ❑❑❑ m m m 0 0 a a W H H CJ H O O O H H H H H < O a z H o a O O O a a a m m N c9 w m H < U D; H U(D 0 x4 x x z a < D z a a D: 11 11 11 x E H z a r a a a w E x o a w w w O o D w < cz w D: m w w w u U U E E a m m a O H O z z z D D D m m a ❑ z ❑ a a H H H D; a Ix D D a m Z H 7 17 ID x x x m m m x x a z F+ Ga W z O > Ln O O o O O o o o o O o o Ln O D H O .-4 O O O O O o O u) al C N O ("� -� 0>1 cD ri O �-1 r-1 H r-I H r-4 r1 O O O (D N 0 U E. H ❑ a m z z z H H H m m OI z m U H < U ,z H ❑ h a h a h H x H x H x z x 14 x z x D x D x < a FC a < a 0014 z C' •-1 m Ln 0) Ln LO .-1 ri r rl C. m .-1 Ol -4 o N H N N N M N d' N .--1 In N to N N O H O Z O o H x c) o CD U E m o M 0 M 0 m 0 moo 0 0 M 0 m 0 m 0 N 0 OD 0 m 0 m o m O d' o W 0 m 0 C7 £ W r.>; w vl F vl H c H vl F vl H Er H c E. vl F e• F E F c E c E c H IT H c H c E c E H c r1 F O Ln O m Ol 01 r M r C o O O O r O) O Ln O C O O O O -v V' O1 a' LT -41 (N N N m z W £ E. z o l0 M to .-i cT N H r .-1 O O N r O N oT v' oT to r O O m r-I N N r >+ O H H N r1 r M r m C M r M H N V' a m - O N O N o m to M r v' o O r M M c m M �o r-I L,o m O H H to N r rn r r m C' . -1 M N E+ U a N Ln rn O m Ln D: z a w w U m W H > OU FC FC W W a a a a O U❑ w a a a m w m w F z a a C9 o z H z H E F U U H z H F 2 H H F z F W O H O ElH O O H a O H O H 9> U W O E O H O E O El D £ £ O El H O F W W O H El a a. El a la� O H a El H F a W W W o: W W a W a E F W £ 0 > H x 0 ❑ H a❑ 0 ) ::)0 O 0 C) ) �a U 0 ❑ H o❑ 0 W HHHq W W 0 muUU❑ u u a a a a w❑ 0 w u H z H u co z W U co z w x F z W W 24 W x z w F a� F z w c) co z w a a a a a a z w w D❑❑❑ W W m z w w F z z w r' W ❑ > M' D W> z U 00 U> z 00 z> W> D a D a D a> D CY. x z a z a z> a £ FC D> O a w W w w W H a i4 U U W co W W W 4 4 .4 z U co U W 11 q O a' W r1 Ln Ln r.>; o 01 O m r m m m m m d' m rn �o I z > z FQ £ .--1 Q' -w o L-1 C) 1-4 m r-1 O m o m 0 Co tD l0 to V' m kO 1-4 O) of r H q H H D z O M N M N O N O N M (D N 0 N O N r m r m r m o) m m to 1-1 to O m H x Ln > r' Ln O O o �o to l0 to N N N FC z a < m w m x 1 O 0 w F p: W o O N 01 O C) O O Ln Ln N M o O o o o 0 C) o O O C) O O O o O O O O O O O pq O Ln O O N Ln O O O O O O O O O O O D z 01 d' cy) O M (O rl)C, O c) O Ln O H Ln M o M o M O M O M O c) O cD O M d� C) O LS O H �o �o N r r r r r r io ID z D N Ln N O O O to Ln to Ln to LI7 O Lf) Ln Ln Ln Ln C' Ln -q Ln H O M Ln C' Ln O U rM N O C' \O to N M M M U f� H O H O fi O <D O r1 O C) O O C) O ri O CD O C. O c- O H O r1 O H O (D O a C�7 w w z z z Pao a a a O a< W H H H o 0 0 0 z Ln H U U £ W W W U U U U ❑❑ H a < z W w H U U O W U W H H H z H z H z H w H w H 44 H GW a FC a FC W W 1 W H H W r.� W r.� W 4 w K4 a < a, H H H H 3 3 H r.� W H U a w a a s N N w a £ 0 £ 0 £ 0 a a a a a s El W 14 z CQ H O F-4 w O x O x W a W s w CD U U U z z z z l w 14 w D ❑ gm >i a z w a a W W 00 a a Z W - W - W - w w w w w w w w S 00 3 z H 9� a< a a 0 ❑ S w z U O x U O W O w 3 O w 3 O w 3 O ❑❑❑❑ z D z D z D z D ❑❑ U U w w a h a s a a a a a a a a ££ £ H w z 0 D w > Ln r o N o r-I o .--I 0 Ln o Ln C) Ln o O 0 O 0 O 0 Ln 0 Ln 0 Ln o Ln O 1-1 o 1-1 O Ln 0 >+ U E+ o 3 0 W 0 V 0 U 0 a 0 n, 0 W .1 3 .-1 3 H 3 o z o z o z o z o CI o 0 r� U 0 a w a 0 a 0 s O a O s O a O a O a O a D a D a D a D a U ££ V %-P 0015 Z N M a' r m 01 O H (N M C t.f) LO r w 0) o H N M T O F. z N O O .--I C) v) x U c) c c m m m m cD m m m W co m m(D W o o W El O O c) o O o O c) O O c) O O O O O c) O o 0 o O O O 0 O (J FQ V' C V' V' V' V' V' C pq E El El El El ElF E, E' E H El E E- E E El El E, H E E E W 0 0 o m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H O o O al O o O O o 0 o O O O. o o O O O o 0 0 .-� Z H W Z o O O ui 0 H d' .-) O O to Lr) O r O - O r of of O C' O Lo 0 r O r O V' o m O N O o1 O 0l O O 01 C' �+ 0 r1 N N M O io .-1 M H M of r-1 H M O Q N M 1 a N O O O co O c0 O O O N O cD r- o � o a a a a a 1 .a a a a 14 a a a a a a N N M O FC FC FC FC < FC < < < < < < FC < < < < N U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 1 I z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x cn U U U U U U U U U U U U U U V U U Z W w W W W w w W W W W W w w w w W C7 E H H H H H H H F E H H H H H E H a a W a a a H a 1� ll-- 11 11\1 11 1 1� 1--1 1 1\ 1� 11 r-� H a H E O E1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U El O q O O ££££ E H W fZ H 114 < a E1 a w a w a O H O U O O U O W O O H E H E F+ H H H H H E E H H H H F+ > a q O 0 a q q 0 H q CD q U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U H h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h 121 cU) W El W > W F W W W W h h w > m> > j)> a> x> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 q Z z q O d. QG z z z z a. a. 114 a W w a a 14 Q' a. U) H E H cn U 04 a W a W CL a o. W a 0.. W W CL CL W R. w w U w H q a o O w o H 1 Z z x N Q1 H 1-1 H 1-1 H H H r-I r1 r1 1-1 1-1 .-a H q H a m N O O O O- O O O O C. O O O O O O O O H z O N O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N H y, a z m w m o: 1 O O F N o N O O O O O O O N O N (V O O O O O O O o W m O 01 O O O O O O O M O M M O O O O O O O O CQ (Q uO O L() O O O O O O O u) O N N O O O O O O O O E 5 m M 01 H t71 M Lo N 01 Ln Ln Ln N N C 1n M V' (l Lf) Lo N z o M O Lo O O o O O O 0 O O o O O O o 0 O O O a r1 �o �o � �o io Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo �o rn Lo � rn � Lo �o �o H Z N O N M r H N v' r v' LO Lo r 01 N N .-1 01 r N a' N .'� O O O Ali r1 u-) O Q1 W H H H .--1 m oc» m if) N of O of Ol N O N N r V' r Lo Lo r r r r Lo �o Lo v' to Lo r W ko U U rl H H r1 .-4 H r.4 o 0 0 0 0 o O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '-I r1 H f-4 V' .-i V' V' V' V` Q' d' C R' a' d' H -w V' d' -v V' F z z M 2 O H O Fl LO < N H o, U H a a H w 3 E + 1 rC Q m z W U a .w-1 z W z a D W C7 z a z O z x z a s o a o U) z '� h H z OG E Cu w z O > 0 0 n n o o o r r 0 C) U E. W cHn Z F 3 z z a u x x z U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H U U U V U U U U U U U U U V U U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u) cn m m m cn � cn m m m cn 0 m cn m m z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x x z a x w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z rH H H H H , i H ,H H .-I H H H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H ,H H H -4 H 11 rH H H ,H H ,H H 11 H V V V V V V V V U V U V U V V V V H H H H H H H H H H H H z Z z zz+ Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z LLIM z N �o r m LA r N M O r1 N M T u) O .--1 N M a' Ln to r N a) O rl N l0 Ln N Lo u) to to N LnN Lo t0 w �o ri p� O E z N O O N \ ri x v O W U E+ co O m O m O m o 0 o O O O O O O O O m o m O 00 O m O m O m O m o m 0 m o m O m O 00 O m O cr O 0 <. d' d' V' V' �' V' C V' V' d' V' V' C' V' V' d• C C' C V' d' dw Vw V' -IT C C' Vw W W H H H E1 El H H E E E E H H H H H H H E E-1 E H H H H El H E+ r v O O O O m O N M cT u') O r1 m N r O 01 a' O O O 01 m O rl E O O O O m 01 r �o 0 mr O m d' lO m O cm) r r N al O v' C w l0 cr N rt z E W z 10 m m 10 M m m N Ln r r r1 Lo Lo N N r r 1M M N N u) N m ul N Ln x O M r I0 r r to m m H r-+ w r q' (D 00 v' V' to M m a) m r1 O N >+ O r N m N N I M rl rl rl N I a o O rn ri 01 N a a a a r o z z o Fl� U FC U FC U FC U M 01 H rl H H H H r W z z z x m W w W W < E H E+ E1 H H H H FC RC O FC oO z aW H o o H a a x OH HHEEO W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W O Ua > z U U U U CQ H H H H . H H H H H H H H H H H H . . H H H z 0 w w w w z a a a a 14 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 14 a a z � z x H m 17 h h h W a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a W w H w O O O O> a s aL a s 04 a s a, a s a, a s aL a, a, a, a a, a, a, '> H .7 m 0 0: 04 11: C4 o o m n o n o 0 5 5 o a::) o a m m m 0 0 5 0 z z U) a a a a m m m m U) m m m m U) m U) m m m m Cl) m m m U) Ui H W w m m O m m O 0 LO LO N r N m ID l0 m 110 m m r M LO N N N O rl 41 0) C' N N (IJ r r N rl 0) 0) m m O W r LO Ln Ol r O H O v m 01 k0 l0 O LT Lr) Ln 0) r M M m m > I Cq 1 1 I I Ln m H r rn H wU') m m ra r w Ln Ln )n M m Cr) m o 0 z z x LO r1 (n LO O r w M O O N r N H H •--1 m m O O O O 0) H 0 H D O O O O V' C N -w q m M d' V' 'V' Lo M )n Ln Lo Lo d' m Lo N m Lo 0) H z O O O O Ln Ln )n Ln Lo o Ln Ln Ln Lo Ln ul Ln Lo Ln in )n Ln in u) Lo uo ri 0 N N N N H H H ri rl r1 rl H rl rl rl rl rl H .--1 •--I .--I ri ri rl rl rl CI• H x w w a I I O O r4 E (Y. O O O O O O C.O O CD O ri O CD O r O O N O O O '-1 O N M N W CD O CDm m O O O O O O O O r-1 O O O O O O O O O r1 O O m al m 0 0 0 w O O O O O O O O m O O O m O O m O O O m O m In LO 0 M m m M M H r1 M H M M M M r1 r1 M r1 M r1 M O1 O1 z O O O N N O O O CD O CD O O O CD O O CD CD O O O C) O CD O C) O C) O O O O �o w E. z r1 Cw N m H H 1-1 N ID N w m 10 rl .--1 m rl rl r`) r1 -4 -4 N -4 M m N 5 N 1T Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O in Lo Lo Lo )n Lo Lo u) Lo Lo 10 Lo Lo O Ln O O Ln Ln O O a V' N N N H V' C' V' d' r-I a' (+/ M C H H ri m N .-a Ln N .-i M N U U rl rl rl 1-i H H ri ri H ri rl rl rl rl rl rl rl H rl rl r-1 .--I r-I N H -4 f-4 rl FC. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ri cr .-1 .-i rl rl rl rl r-I rl .--1 H .--I H 1-1 •--I ri r1 r-1 H r1 .-A H Ln rl rl rl r1 U U U U z z z z a H H H H m El O 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U W Ln m m m m z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z U 0+ m m m m H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H x HP H E E E H El E E El ElE-E E El El El E El 0 H I w w w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a K4 al a a a 04 a a a 04 al 04 Q1 a a4 a a a 04 a a a a m a w E z z z z W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W m a z O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W a a a a a w w w w w w W w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w a N a w w w w U U U U U U U U U U 0 U U U u U U 0 v U U U z w 11+ x x x x H H H H H H H H H H H H H I- H H H H H H H H z a FC O U U U U 44 G.1 C4 [4 [4 C4 Ca [4 G.1 W 44 G.1 Ea C4 C4 G.1 C4 C4 fs.1 a 0 H H H H [i [L [4 44 G4 ( 11 1. W GW G G4 41 41 44 G rL E. a z z z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O rrZC E W W z O > rl ra H r✓ Ln Ln Ln Lo Ln ul Ln Ln Ln Ln ul LO u) Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Lo Lo Ln Lo O U) a O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O >1 r1 H ri r1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CD O O r1 rl U E+ U U U U [4 C4 r. Gd 44 C4 44G.1 !4 C4 G.1 [4 [4 G.1 54 GW G4 GW r_� W 44 44 44 H d U H H H H H G. G+ C4 14 G. GW [4 C4 Ga [4 C4 E14 [4 44 54 44 44 C4 5.1 C4 G.1 44 a < F�C U z z z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O a 0017 z M w r .-1 00 H (n -4 O N c' 1D T) �O l0 N r M N 01 O F O z N O 41 O M \ H c x U au m m m m m m m O (4 H O O C) O o 0 o O o O O o 0 0 C7 £ a r.0 P7 c F cr H vl H c E c El vl El vl El E- F c H c H c ElF Er vl F vl F H E-E I� O 0 O 0 O aD O O M H r1 M O o O 0 O o O O O o l- M N m H z w E. z CI1 N o T) 1` N 00 O [- O N O a 1n E >1 D O M Ln N d' N N V N Ln M CIl O O Y' 1 H 1n to C. O N O I- N < N d' H d' N rn N a m o N Ir d1 o CDCO O o O c V' o O O O o O 0 O LO N Ol M N 01 N N t` N M w O O r- C N r N C7 z H O o 1n M T' v' M O c .--I N x U) N H U U a o a a a a H a w a a x x a 14 z z z F44 F o< H E F F F E+ F E+ x< F E w E w E 4 F m 04 F w x w x W 0 HE- O a w o F a a 0 H O F Z O U) E U) 0 E+ x O 0 E. O; 0 E+ a w a W 0 E+ w > 0 E+ w U w U UP H a a a V4 00 El FF z co z O E. z m 0 z O 0G z 0 F Q: x Cl) x U) z H z z 0z O a O OH > z a U O ❑ z Iz co 0 ❑ z UUO t7 cx D❑ x z w H a O M z 00 D❑ a Co Z z w M C4 w O ❑ z w C7 < 0 ❑ z U D❑ z o z a a❑ 0 z z c❑ 0 z G, z w Cu z w H UD w x w E E w a W E w w w W E. W F w w x w w ❑ > 0 0 > co z U) z > a D > U) z > [ w [_ w > U) 0 > m z > H zz H > E o > S a $ lz U) w w a H H U) H F] I0 a H z N s U W ❑ 4�'. rn 1n Ln m 01 H O N O a) N 0)H 00 Q 1 W H CD O N C O N O N N N N z H ❑ z H X D (n N CD O O N � I- U r-1 I -4 I H ❑ z O H H M H M H H W ❑ 1'7 N O N O H x a z a � oa Di m a I O o w F 1x w O o N rn N rn O o N rn O o O 0 O o N rn M w M m U') �n r pq o Ln Ln o Ln a) un o Ln 1n Ln �0 1n LO D z M O 01 CD 01 O ID l0 0)O 1 1U')1n O 0 V' O1 O 0 C1 O ( lD 01 O CI O ID ID z D Ln N N CD N O M to N CD 00 00M CO 1n N CD M N M 1n .-I 1n CD O H (D O U C' N N N N N M M U H o H O H O r-I O -4 O .-i 0 H 0 H O .--I O -4 O 1-1 O r1 O •-4 0 .-1 0 U) [l U) G+ Gu E E+ r•C H H < O w W M c� x x CD m O CD O U I W a Ln a Y x (7 C7 El z El z z Y El z E1 z < 1 w rz O U) z El z El D O D O D O F v D 0 D 0 F £ Ul W a z H N E+ E-F F F PG W E-F D U) D to r•C (7 0 W ❑ w ❑ w ❑ W ❑ W ❑ (Tj H f� 0 H a H s U) E 0 z 0 z 0 w > H a H 0 1--I U) H U) H (f) H m >� a < z a s x a a a u U a w z x W x W x w a w x W a 0 ❑ U w O w O a < x w W w CA U) W < w >> H H > H >> H H a z z U a s x h x x x a s H w z 0 w > O O O O Ln O O N uN O O Ln O O D 0 Ln O O H O H LO O M O O H O .--I O O N O Co O (A O m O O H O H U E. U H z U a EF H a F H s a U) w m x GW CA U) w 0 H > H > H > H > H > U H A FC U x a d a z a x z 0018 m c Ln w r m m m 0 .-i N m c Ln w m r m r r r r r r r r N r m m m m m m m N m N M O N O E z O c x o W cD um E o m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 V' 0 m o m O m o m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m o O o 0 Co C7 rL W c E c E c H E E E �w E c H c ElF -IT c E c E c E c E a H c N c H c E -w E+ 'r E c El W c r-1 N O m O w O .-i O O O �o N m O N r 61 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r �O H H .� z w El z N H O O .-1 a r O O o o U1 O O O O o O m r .--1 x > i D U uO Q' O O M N r-1 r O m Ln r d' r M m N r to M O rl Ln m r O r r m N N .-1 M O N IT H O m O .--I (n N T a 1 N r (1) r rn Co o O O o o o O r- 10 f+1 (N a. E. O m O N N 01 O N ❑ z Ol o) r- O H E+ to z m m H H rC x N rL W M W U > U > U > U > U > U > N z O 0 z a O m m m m m m H Ei H z a z z z z z z a H a a U U U a a H � a a m W W W W w w < H< < > > > < 4 FC KC z z x £ E E E £ m E O U ll E O E m m m E O E 0 E H O H O z rr; W ', U UUUUUH W w >+Em � m m m m m ZE. ° N w 0 1O-I o w ff 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w C7 a 0 w ❑ a o H a x o x x x x x w x w x w x z o U x o z rz o m w a o E- > z a U z w z w z w z w z w z w z❑ H z �a ❑ z o❑ u z u U U u U U U U❑ z D❑ PY z w❑ iD z H❑ a z H m x w w w z z z z z z z z W E w < w a, W w w ❑< 3 3 3 3 3 3 0> O N> x al >F:�< a a a a r> a a a a > m> z z> a, D > z w m a a a a a a w w as a s a, n, a s as H to 0 w w U W rn rn rn rn rn rn H❑ a m m m m m m rn rn O > I > W W 0n N in N in N cn N (n N In N H N rl N M N Ch .1 N N O N N r Ln N N Ol r z H ❑ z H E O H I I I I I 1 1 N 1 N I N I N I N 1 N I N I N I a' r LO �n H ❑ z N o N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 H o N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N o Ln r M H x a z m w m I 0 o 44 E (Y, a O N m L .--I c r Co r r r r r r r r N O O O W w LD Ln r Ln Lo Ln Lo Ln Lo Ln r Ln r u� m In o o v Ln -ITLn �n Lo �n �n n Ln Ln -ITo �n �n Ln c Ln rn Ln o o o o � �o D rn o rn 0 rn 0 rn o rn 0 rn 0 rn 0 rn o r c c o o o cn o Ln 0 o o o 0 o o o o a)r O m M o o)z 0 io �o �o �oio �oo �o �o �o �o �o ID io io �o F z ri .1 N V' C' V' V' C' C' N Ln m N D O O M CDC) M O M CD M O M O M (D M (D O M u'7 V Ln u� M ifl M �n M N M Lo in M al M al M an M O N Ln m Ln N O N U U < o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 co E. m w m w m w m 1-4 m w m w o m w U w U w U w U w U w U w U w U G4 H Cu H H [s' H G.+ H w H G.1 H H ❑ (Y. O H > H > H > H > H > H > H > H > � N PG P P4 a a a z z CY fY fY a a a a a H W x W m W m W x W x W x W x H F W > W m W m W m W m W m W m W m W m a rt M m m m m m m m CsJ a. m a D a z z z z z z z z K i Ln F F F F F E+ N z H F f H H H H H H z CY a < z D z a z D11) z z D z D z n x H w w w w w w w w O H H x a H < O O O O O O O m z w w w w w w w w E W r%4 1 a' U U U U U U U N U z H z H z H z H z H z H z H z H D I-i m z H F m W F+ W W W W W W W E W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U x Cu < .7 z pa H ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ H H H H H H H z D ❑ H z W z W z W z W z W z W z W z W m E rC w O U 1 D > a m a m a m a m a m a m a m a o U m z z z z z z z z w m a a F x a ❑ H H H H H W cr�� El m Cu z H a H a a o a H a a a H a m m m m m m m m a m m m F+ z O w > O O O O O O O H O O O O O O O o O O r-1 O C (� jl 1 D O >i (D I i (D 1-1 O H O .--I O O O O v� O O (D -1 (D r1 O H1-1 O . (D H (D H Cl H to cm) .1 O O {� fi }IJS O E. U F > H > H > H > H > H > > H > H > O U < U 0c a a a a H a a a H a m FC m FC m m m m m m U m x m m m 0019 z N m c' to lQ r O O m O rl N m M C' Ot O F� M M m m M M M oo W 0) M M M M m m 6) C 0. O E z N O D O N x c ow U H o o c 0 c 0 cD 0 o 0 cD 0 c 0 co 0 cD 0 occ)oo 0 0 m 0 m 0 c• 0 ooc C) 0 0 oo 0 cD 0 (D FCC c c c c• -lv c c c Ir c c £ W CQ H E-E E+ El H E H E 4 HP E E E F+ H E El O O O O Ln O O O O O O O O O N Ln O O H o Ln o LO (Na") o o ul o 0 0 0 m .� z [s] El. z O r to r \Q N O u 1 N N \Q �Q O m to O r N OD V7 O H '-i m N r r-I H C c' c' c' O lQ O N }i Q r m rl ID M N N O O N N M a' H H N N M m rl co a m .i to O O O N to 0 .--I r O O O lQ 7 to .--� m m O N m M u) O r at to m N M C O t.0 O c c < a U r �Q o: m m W r a w W W W W W H z z z z z z a D U U U U U E H H H H H H < m m a H H H H H F+ a FC a E E E E E H a co a D4 a a a < > > > > > z FC U < m m m m m m < < H FCC E-E 4 < z E Q: 0Y a a ox H E H E W W W W W W E E E+ z E E. O O W W W W W O Ga O E E+ El E El O o O fL O W O O W H H m m m m m � ElH El H o f W H > E+ E-E a U E H m m m m m m N z W O "W I1', a a P4 61a Q; W a a P'. a a a a a a Q: Q: R'. z u) z E O H O W W W W W 0 O w Q r.0 FC FC u'i 9 FC O a O w O a O w O U > CL' ❑ E E H E E < ❑ U ❑ H H H H H H ❑ E-E ❑ a ❑ g ❑ I"1 ❑ D z U z D D D D D a Z z z 114 z z a a. z Di z U z H z a z Z H m W w w w a, a, w w W w w w w w w w w H w U w w w H W ❑ > x 0 x£ 0 E E o W> O> E H H H E H> x> El x> W> m W> u co H co Q U � a > U w I -I ❑ Q; M O m c N N N o O r-I � O O W to Ot c c• co m m m m m m N N > I > W O O O O O O tb w w co O r M (M I z z x m m m m m m N N N N N •-I o lQ N H ❑ H D I I I I 1 I .-a •-a .-i r-I to OD o H z N N N N N N m 01 01 01 M •-I C' 01 m ❑ O O O o o O 01 M M Ol M O r-I N D H x a � ao w a 1 1 Q o w H (Y. •-1 H rl ri .-1 w O O O o O o O o m O O N W o O O O O O O O O O O O O O c' O O Ot ([j l0 lQ lQ w w w O o to O O to O o W O O u7 rn rn rn rn rn rn r rn rn rn rn rn rn to rn rn z o 0 0 0 0 o m o Q o 0 0 0 w o 0 w io �o cQ w IQ w W to �o IQ cQ �o E+ z N N N N N N N M OD O OD OD r 01 rl m rl N D O O O O O O to W m N m O w Ol O to to O Q in to to Ln o to m W w lQ to lQ ul N m N U U N N N N N N •-I H H H H H H H F(; O O O O o O O c) O O c) O (D O (D O O O O c> (D O N N to lfi N to •-i V' d' V' c' c' c' V' u7 z z z z z z U U U U U U W H H H H H H HHH H .. O a a a a a a U U U U U U U ❑ H H H H H H N El m m m m m m m U z z z z z z E. E- C) x x x x x x O x x x x x x z a o x a x x x a co U U U U U U w x w m to o O o O O O co w w w w w w U > E 04 3 3 3 3 3 3 FC H H E. H H E W W O W E E E E O O O O O O O H z H WWWWWW a w w w w w w a m I z z z z z z U C7 C7 C7 0 0 0 O H 7y � u) a£i W E E E E E H E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ W D w a z m m m m m m z z z z z z z ❑ FC E E m M 11 W W W W W W a FC FC << FC 4 m x D KC D 3 3 3 3 3 3 W a a a a a a O co C7 m N Ol x x x x x x x x x x x x x x - x H < o; E+ E E H H E H H E+ H H E+ E. £ 7 z O z a < a O ❑ D O D O D O D O D O D O D O D O D O D O D O D O D O FC E. E H W m z m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m [ m h E G+ w z 0 > r r r r r r m o 0 o Q O o O to m o N ❑ O o O o O o m C. O O O o O •-I d' O O r V o> U E+ o D 0 U 0 D 0 0 D 0 D o D r+ D D D D D D o < 0 < o w ri O o m J U H 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O E+ E H E D < U m m m m m m u) m m m m m m m m cn m m 0020 z H N 0 r m m m O o N o m o r c m c ct w F O z a v m m m m c o c v N C. (D to H x O W 0 U - E < c O c O m o oo 0 oo 0 m o c O m o c o m O c c 0 c oo 0 v oo 0 v w 0 c c C. c W PO F E F F+ F F E F E-E F E E-E E+ F E .-1 f-I H F z E. O O O O O O O O O O O O C. O m 01 O O O O N M O1 r N m O O C V' w z O to Ol r O O O O O O u'7 r o M r m H w r O M r O N r o� m N O m m N 0% Ln m o r a Ln 0 m H 0 O 0 o o 0 O o m rn o O o o rm o o N N an m Ln r Ln r O M r m H Ln w m H 1n r Q C' r O m m N m N W U N N z O 1 H N E W m o w m Q a 1�4 ai a U > U > U > a < m a FC C7 a FC a s 4 < x a < H FC H 4 a 9 H a F4 F H z O E+ O z O E O U H E+ O m m m Cn E O a O F O z O F O to W E O U F O W W a. W F O U H El O a W U H E. F H F F Cu E-E z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 F a E EF a F+ a < E+ z O E+ x x E+ Cv 41 E < z H O W H ai O U D % o oo. O H E. H EE. H E.E H % O z O IY. O m m Ri o m z O "In. E o m 0 z 0 z 04 o o z O 0 H z a U Q z Z El Q a w Q z U W U W U W U W Q z U ❑ z W a Q z a H Q z < a Q z a H H"❑ m GQ z d W ❑ z F+ O H m W w > m z> w U U w ,7 W m a m CL m a m> W E m> W w 04 w > rS El W S D a> W <££ 0L D> w U U> W £ 0 m Q O U o m z H z H z H z H W a H W a o a W Z a w a a, O m % a w w U W O N m 1-1 H Q 0 a W O o O r m cn CD o I z > z 0.l ,x I l0 m O �D O O (n ID N Ln N H Q H F-I D z r O r O r O r O �o O O O i m O N O F N ❑ H ,Y, N o1 o) m 01 to M O O 3 H < z a 4 m w W I 0 o w H w w m un o\ m (D O O O m In to in m M Io (D O O N O O O O O O O m m N N P7 in ul O O Ln in l0 to O O O O Ln m D z 01 O W 01 (D to 0l O to of O to 01 C. l0 0l O to of O to In M l0 Ln Ln l0 01 O l0 cq N to M m m .-I N to of O l0 M V' I0 E+ z D O1 M M Ln N -1 r m m r N Ln H Ln M ul m o N Ln H Ln r Ln H 1n m in m O o U �o N r 10 to V' N N M N N U r� O O O O O O O O O O 1-1 O ri O -1 o O o z z z z E-E W H H H H a FC m m m m m O z H z < z z z 9 U H N El a a a a U z a m C7 0 C07 a < m z MMMD m m m m z H H x U w m z H z H z H D U z I 0 U 0 z z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z a < a KC Q m �: m x m £ x W H r� w E+ a H > U U U U W a z 0 w m z D D a D a D a > W a a 7. W H a' U w a w x w x w x w x 0 z H E-F w a 0 a at Q 04 0 U a, O < D < a I F FC a FC; a K4 a < a a < z I U w >+ a N a Y+ a H o W a a FC a 0 z z H H H H D H E ❑ a a a w H a m Q z w E+ D h a H a E+ a F a F a E E EH a D z D Fc > a > s > a G F f-4 z O W > O O O O O O O o O (DO O O O / l O r ��! D 0 >+ r-I (D.--I O H O 1-1 O H O H (D H O O r-I In .-I rl (D N O N O N O Ln (D-1 O C.! r U E U H Di w w Z H a: H a. H ai H o. D a. H F E a4 Q z a FC a < a FC a W a, H 4 U E-E F+ E E E E E+ E-E D D 0021 Z am 0 v Ln io r .-i N m m Ln m rL c Lr) o 0 0 0 Ln u-)Ln Ln o o E Z N O or r c x U a> c m m m m v) v) c c <r m O W E o 0 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 0 0 < c a IT c cl c -w c c c -wW W F F H H E E F E. F F E E S 01 l0 -T v r N O r O r O O M N Ol o) O �n r �o O r Z 1+ W x Z D m m in O H m N c 0 m Ln N m a' r m c o [r >, O Ln m < N H N a c Ln r o r r c o n O rn u� r Lrn m o 6 m m N V d r N m Ol Z cn O W a 0 U) w El < a a E > o < o a a Z E Z W H H W H F W W H W H O O W> O O rn O O m m Z w O W H H Z E+ E 2 H OZ H < 4 H< H H a a a W a co m m a �d a El a a a a a O H O 0 x O W W W W O H O U O O > a ❑ w a❑ H H H H❑ ❑ D❑ a a a a❑ Z U Z O Z a a a a Z H z a z w w w w z H ul W M r�+ W CL fL a Q1 W z W E W H H H H W w > rn > w w w a> w> u) > as a, w w> ❑ o N D D D D > z 0 0 0 0 m 3 U W H U U U U W 54 U W N O H ❑ a d' .-V m m to O O W e-i M in Ln H to N N O m > I > W d �o m m m r M v v m O Z ZZ"' to m m m N Ln .-I r r m O H ❑ H O r r to to H O m r r m m O O O O O O m m r m ❑ .-i N O O O O m O O H O H ^,L z a FCC m w m a I O O w F a O O O O O O o N C' N W O O o O O O O o O O Q pj O O O O O O O Ln �n l0 l0 m 1D D m m r ri H H m 01 Ol 01 Z O O M o o O O o 0 0 C) o o E Z H m N m m m M D un Ln o 0 0 Ln Ln o Lo m Ln Ln O r r r H m N N r r H U U F<; O O O O o 0 0 o O O O o Z O a a E a a a w H D a a "' "' a o El E.H F Z Z Z Z O a s H I-1 H H u) 0 0 0 0 Ln W W z z z z Z w HHHH a H H D D D D w a a a E- Pa P E E 2: x 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 F:� 0 0 U U U U F O u, u, w w W El U U .7 Z E+ F H E 3 O O O O a a a a O U U U U .4 .4 W N a co w H x x x x w mm a a. u) m aaaao .a ❑ H H < cn z >> a a a a 3 ❑ x x x x E-E W W Z O > o 0 0 0 0 o m O o 0 0 0 D O o H H H 1-1 0 0 1-4 .-I 1- 0 rl o 0 0 0 o H o 0 0 0 U H co u) a a a a u) O a a a a U H H H FC FC FC W O W W W W <(-) >> S S 3 3 3 3 x x x x a W pin O El 0022 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 10:41AM 04/04/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 48983 04/04/02 ANG100 ANGEL BAKERY 500.00 48984 04/04/02 ATT040 AT&T WIRELESS DATA SVC 49.00 48985 04/04/02 BIA013 BIA - DESERT CHAPTER 29.00 48986 04/04/02 CEN050 CENTURY CROWELL 4670.00 48987 04/04/02 COA005 CITY OF COACHELLA 42.00 48988 04/04/02 IMP010 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 7653.03 48989 04/04/02 IMP012 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 1000.00 48990 04/04/02 INT014 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF 50.00 48991 04/04/02 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS 261371.29 48992 04/04/02 SOU002 SOUL OF CHINA 322.59 48993 04/04/02 SOU010 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO 629.23 48994 04/04/02 VER200 VERIZON 365.29 48995 04/04/02 WEL025 WELLS FARGO BANKCARD 1219.28 CHECK TOTAL 277,900.71 06 0023 z r N m C 0 W m O H fi r-I N r-I m r-I C r-1 n rl lO rl N O F+ O z C) O V' H O W U E+ U x 0 E 0 x C7 £ U x C7 £ C7 x£ U C7 U x O E CD x 0 x U x 0 x 0 x£ 0 C7 W FC p7 W El W H W H W H W E W E W E W E W F W El W E W E W El W E W H W F W E N O E- O O O (D O O O O O O M N m M N N m 01 O O O N O u-) �O M O O O N .--� z W F z O o1 o1 O N c� m N N O N r� r-I [h c0 �O �+ O 0 O N C N r- l0 Q' v' f H Ln m N r-I O) M 1- O O H M r-I M m O O M [-- O C. N N v C a' rl Ol CL M f-I N O O O O O O O O O O m O O O O O �+ O N 01 a ❑ a) N W O ko N m l0 H a O O O m a z W H r W E H x (L x Pa w x w a s <� z� `£ a z a a w .a z 0 z 0 a 4 z W z w z w z W z W z x F+ E+ H E H r� ❑ 4 0< E W F UUUUP < �Kr. E-E ❑❑ F ZXXXE W O H E O O E ❑ O E. w W 0 E < \ O x E+ U 0 H > u) > O > u) > m 0 E U O E. \\ a H O E' W a W a w W a w a H aal \ a u) a £ a o a .zD- a U U U U a F a x x a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0" F 0 (n o a 0 H O a 0 H H H H O U O w u) O > z a U H❑ u) z W 14 ❑ z rC a C] Z E z O z O ❑ z a E a E a H a❑ H z U Cl z a W a❑ W z z W z W z W z W z W H co W O 0.+ W > W a> W W z> W W H> W Cu x> W U W U W U W U W> W H >> w W E W E> W 3 3$ 3$ u) ❑ W ❑ H 3 W 0 w a u) U a w 14 w a w a w H U W x W x a a a a a W w U w H ❑ u1 M N N N N N N N N N N p > I > w CQ rn Ln 0 D 0 D 0 �o a' .-+ .-� w c N v N c N c N c N z H❑ H z H x O z N M Ln H a Q', H a Q', H a Q', O O H m O i-1 O .--I I NNNNN I 1 I I ❑ N > > > O O O O O a � ro w ro a I O o w F a 1n O O M O O N ID O m O O O1 m O N m W Q7 Ln �O O O O (D�n O O . lO M Wl0 kO O O Ln Ln O O O O Ln Ln r to r Ln to 0 l0 uO M Ol 1� !` N 1` 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 z z 1D O m M (D O M N N N N N O v' v' O C. O O O ko z (n u) N O .-1 O �O O H Ln Ln-Ir N d' �n Ln �n N O m m N O O 0 0 O O 0 1-1 c) O 0 O O 0 0 O N un Mm M M M M m U 0 H N H lfI rl H H N c) .> rl ri O H CDO In f-I N N O r-I c r-I O H O c) .--I O fi (D V' O C' O C O (D O 0 C) O E F E H E Cu [++ E. [.I+ cn cn w cn co 0 0 G4 U > H ❑❑❑❑ H H H H ❑ a s H a H a H a H a H a u) a W z z z z z H U H U W x W x W x W x W x m O rL E E p+ a' O H O H O H O H O H z D z 'J cn w cn cn O in < ❑ x .4 i-7 H < E-E 4 E-E < E-E FC E < O U O U H > E. >+ H F >+ H a < fn U �4 W W x 0 H 0 H 0 H 0 H 0 H 4 F4 z D z D z D z D z D > m F s U a a a a a 9C FC 0 0 0 0 0 I ry' a W w ra - a w 0 a r•C O a H a H a H a H a H z 0 z 0 U U U U U WE- m W U U .7 a a a a "H EIH W ❑❑❑❑❑ w w W w al H CQ H ❑ < KC < < 'J >+ OI r7 3 I a O 0 HHHH a a a a H a z a z s m a m a m a m a m a < W a O W 0 H w < E z >-i E w GL w CL w DL w 411 w C4 w E+ w E+ w > w > w > w > w > a U) ❑ z z H a' H m [a] u H U E H E H E H E H x H z H z H H a H a H a H a H a El z 0 W > O O m O Ln O O O O N V' C' O O O O O q O 1- Ln O H -4 . ri O O O O O 0 >+ U El C7 O El O rr; O z O FC O GL O C4 O aL O a O a O E+ O F H > .--I > 1-1 > .--I > 1-1 > U H a' U ,"C. a' E Q'. H CLl w U 0 U x H x H x H x H x H z H z H H a H a H a H a H a 0 V s� 0024 2 r 0o m (D .--1 U-) �o N M v FC N N N N N 0.S O N O H z O N c O W U F U "ZEE U (_'7 0 £ C'J £ C7 £ C7 E C7 £ C7 E£ C7 C7 < W W W W w W W W W W W pq El E+ H E F F H E E F+ rn N O C O 01 M O Ol OD O O -4 O H o OD N 1n N M 0) r 1n O r Z E+ W £ z O m a• r r rn rl N N rn N M M rl M c to c O 0 in 0 Cl >+ O C' 0 r M 00 .-i M lD M fi m H Q\ r a O1 dl M dl aD r N N .-1 r N N N N 01 N N LO ID N dl a rn M to M N F O o 0 cn H N z H H fZ E H w H x z w 43 U)(n w z W z W z w a < E a < a < a rC a ❑ a < a o w w w 0 " 0 0 0 a U 0 W H U O U E UP E. F X z E E-H ° w 0 0 0 a 5 a a >> a W o w o; 0" > (Z w z G. z W z o ❑ 00 U O U > o ❑ CO M O ❑ ouzo Z \ >. ❑ z U W w w z z co z w w z H E O Z H U) W >- w W Z z w H Z a W W 3 3 3> H> m> 0 0> W £ 04 > 1 U) ❑ Q,' a a' a �i a H U 1 > w m <1' N a' N a' N co in N m O N O O 01 O 0) O Ol W H ❑ H H a z 1 N 1 N 1 N V' Q' l0 N C l0 1-1 r N N N O ❑ 0 0 O r o 1n r <T c cr H H x a z m w (n a 1 O o w H p4 �n � O O O N O N O W w l0 10 O O O M O N 0 (q Ln 1n Ln Ln O O O l0 O N O £ O O1 0) m r 0) Ln rl r M rM z O O O M N M M M a v E. z .--I .-i r-1 '-i r (+') d' N M V' O O O o 0 0 Ln Un Lr) O o 0 U r.� O O o O O co O O 0 w co w (n w w w w H a H a H a 0 W W W U ❑ ❑ ❑ cn CO ai cxn m o x x `zz U) F+ z P z F+ z E. (Si D D .7 < H (A W W 0 0 0 H 1 F O O O rC x U C7 (7 0 W H H H H Cu z z z Na ° x o a a a o (n m (n < a FC a 0 w > w > w > a a F x H Z H rZ a a a a a a a (n ❑ z HHH !Z (Z Q: O U) O cn W > W > W 3 W 3 W 3 El k z 0 W > o 0 o N 0 0 0 Ln Ln Ln `J O O O 0 .-1 O O N N N 0 U H -4 > 1- > > O o O o N a N s O a O a O a U H a� U H rZ H a H s 0 cn 0 w >> 3 3 3 0 0025 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 48982 04/02/02 UN1300 UNITED STATES TREASURER CHECK TOTAL 10:14AM 04/02/02 PAGE 1 PAYMENT AMOUNT U E, ") 0026 z El o H z N O N O O W H C7 < W W El N N O rn F o z H W z o £ D w >+ O l0 a a z E+ O �C O W H a E+ U El E H P� Q O H a O � C4 a O z U o z H O a W W W � U WO U; a O w o I W C z z x H 'z. H x a z W r� aq w w a I o O w F r o W O W o E z F z O Ln O U U o a w a 0 m M o w O rx u) E a m w F E. W H E. a z co pq H Q > 1 a w a FC O H a 0 z cn z o E k W z o > o D o OU El u U H Z U a K4 H O H EH z W r a V „i, 0 0027 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF 11:11AM 04/01/02 PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 48981 04/01/02 PAL010 PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESRT CHECK TOTAL PAYMENT AMOUNT 25000.00 25,000.00 V *f 0028 �a o E z N O H O O W E C7 FC W a W F N O O O r E+ O O + z E. W z o 0 p o O >, O o 0 u') W N N O O N O a O F� E+ CD Elz Ln o W N E E H F H Z � w S >i o a a+ U FC z El w O U O W H > H U E+ co H rL4 a. O H W O > a z ❑ z U H z H (n a w W f1 > I ❑ H � ❑ U w FC H ❑ L4' L4 O w zI z E 0.Wl H ❑ H `i to I ❑ d' E H `.G � z w w a I O o w E a N w m m � E o Ln z o ID E z m a o O rl U U < O H F a m w a E m % O W o U) Cn w a ❑ m I C7 a z W E a z H a W H CL >4 o co r a a o a m z a E G W z o > o a F CD O 14 H < U a N 0029 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 11:32AM 03/28/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 48943 03/28/02 AAA001 AAA TRAVEL AGENCY 792.00 48944 03/28/02 ABE001 JACQUES ABELS 150.00 48945 03/28/02 BAX100 DAN BAXLEY 50.00 48946 03/28/02 BECO10 DEBORAH BECHARD 50.00 48947 03/28/02 BOB100 BILL BOBBITT 50.00 48948 03/28/02 B00100 BOOMERS 195.00 48949 03/28/02 BOU100 MICHELE BOUDREAU 50.00 48950 03/28/02 BUT010 RICHARD BUTLER 150.00 48951 03/28/02 CAL035 CAL PRESERVATION FOUNDATN 1065.00 48952 03/28/02 COA080 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 96.97 48953 03/28/02 CRA200 ROBERT CRAVEN 100.00 48954 03/28/02 CUN100 DENNIS CUNNINGHAM 50.00 48955 03/28/02 DAV010 MIKE DAVIS 50.00 48956 03/28/02 DIA100 DENNIE DIAMOND 50.00 48957 03/28/02 FLA020 FLAMINGO RESORT HOTEL 2400.00 48958 03/28/02 IMP010 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 12110.32 48959 03/28/02 IRWO20 BARBARA IRWIN 50.00 48960 03/28/02 KIR010 TOM KIRK 75.00 48961 03/28/02 KNO055 KNOTT'S SOAK CITY 296.57 48962 03/28/02 LEW010 TOM LEWIS 50.00 48963 03/28/02 LOU100 ELSE LOUDON 50.00 48964 03/28/02 MAH100 CYRILLE P MAHFOUD 50.00 48965 03/28/02 MIT150 MICHAEL MITCHELL 50.00 48966 03/28/02 MOU100 DONALD J MOULIN 50.00 48967 03/28/02 OLA100 MILTON OLANDER 50.00 48968 03/28/02 OSBO50 LEE M OSBORNE CPA 50.00 48969 03/28/02 PUE050 MARIA L PUENTE 50.00 48970 03/28/02 REB050 JOAN REBICH 50.00 48971 03/28/02 REY050 ELAINE REYNOLDS 50.00 48972 03/28/02 ROB150 STEVE ROBBINS 75.00 48973 03/28/02 ROT100 ROTO ROOTER 3390.00 48974 03/28/02 SHA040 ROSITA SHAMIS 50.00 48975 03/28/02 SHA050 ARCHIE SHARP 50.00 48976 03/28/02 STJO10 VICTORIA ST JOHNS 50.00 48977 03/28/02 TH0200 DAVID THOMS 50.00 48978 03/28/02 TYL050 ROBERT T TYLER 150.00 48979 03/28/02 VER200 VERIZON 47.59 48980 03/28/02 WRI050 ROBERT S WRIGHT 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 22,243.45 z • ri v v r N N N O N N M N M C' (M C Lr) lO r N O F O z 00 O W 0 H < W E w x w E W E W E W E w x w E W E w E W E W E w W �r PQ H H HHH H F F F O .. H z F O o o O O o o 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 O 0 o 0 o o r m o o 0 0 W x >-i z D O N 0) r O Lr) r♦ O Lr) O O LO a) r-i O Ln O Ln H Ln m O r-1 N lM 00 M r-I o O r-i a 0 O 0 O 0 o 0 o 0 O o O O o o O o o r rn z O N rn O Ln 0 z O Ln O Ln H O U) d) W z L� rn O LO O r+ z O U z O U O rn O U 4 F H E Ca O z z z F W w z x o o < � z x o << z a a s FC F X a �C E-H cn H a a FC F Q a z < < H w x a < H a U FC > F a F w cn W w a m rt W E-+ a < H z H 0Z W O H a < 0 H O U O H tz rt 0 U) H O H a 0 \ E-+ < W O H cn 0 E-F 0 0 U H x a x 0 a F 0 H a U) H 0" w Z w z x 0 n 0 z H x 0 Ca a r� s H 0 "0 0 z a Ca C) x W O H 0 on a O H a "0 z o U a z 0 H o a (-)(-)0 111,C) tx >> cn cn a O 0 Ca z "CO U W t-+ a a z w > z z < z W > D H a z D W 2: > E z w > Hz x W U > z "W tx z > :::)z x W E > z z z w < > cn H C7 cn z H w 0 > x w H z W H z W > x cn U) Q H a a D U O a a U) 0 U a a w o4 w a 3 U W w U w " 0 o N O N O N O N o N 0 N 0 o 0 0 t z Q > z H E z x U x U x U x U x U x U M �%.0 o o ('M 0 0 Q H x r.0 z a rt CQ w m a t O 0 w H p( w O O o o O O O O O O O O o 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 pq ar o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 z F M w rn O in rn O in rn O LO rn O in M O r m O un rn Cl in r M w r M kD lD ra l0 rn N z O U ri O r-i O cT r-I Ln N r-1 in N r-I Co C Cy) Ln N r-i Ln N r-1 O v' r--I Cl v N O qT N Cl N N O N O O O U r i O r i O H o ri r i O r-1 H O r-i r-i O ri O ri O r-1 o r-i O -1 r-i Co .-i o -4 0 ri z F 0 z H o z D z D x w F x w H 0 O a w za' w z H a a t 0 F: r U) a W < x U E-+ H z a D w a H H 9 > F F:� > a %t 9 s Fr 9 z w W ca co CQ w W FC FC PPP444 W1-4 ~ >4 O+ w H W D W w co a W a w a W a a, w x W x E-H W < a a cz O 0 rC O+ U < z rt+ 0 w w a a H x O O x U H x U H a s U << 0 U 0 W cn 0 CO F w z w FCC h Ca o W m x U U U U c� z 0 D O }i > r i O Cl r-+ O O o O H O ra O O O H o o -4 O o r-i o -4 O Lr) l'M O Ln M O o co O 0 oo O 0 O U H U F-+ U W rA >C FC w U W x m O m O O CQ D O CQ E-H D on a << U s U << O U O U z 0031 z 0) C' OD OD r m O r-i N M IT Lr) OD l0 l0 �r -A N N d H H r I ri r i rl M 9 O H z N 0 O N M N U U' c7 C7 U C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 U' U' C7 U' C7 0 < W W W W W W W w W W W W W W W W QQ H H H H H H E-H EH H H HP H H H H a 0 0 0 o v Ln o ao rn to 0 0 o r o H o o O O O co r o w rn r o o Ln o Z W H z o O O O O N 4 O r i l0 L' CO O to l0 O x a Ln N Lr) N O0 CT M a) M Ln N N u7 r Ol Ln ?+ O 0) vV N H 0) �v co -zr N < -1 N N Ln a O O O O o N o O r O O O O O M O O Ln O H O O o O O o O U O a o U) U-) U-) U Ln U U O r1 Ln r rn F:4 r- w z -+ z z N o o H z z CV N o O w O O H �+ a z o < < w w a 0 a a a w w a a a a a Z E-H H H W W Hu U U U U U U E+ a E+ E H H < 0 O a o U) O a 0 a oc 0 > > > > > > > O o 0 0 rtr 0 w H H \ H H FC EH a a H m U) U) m w U) U) H a H U H W H H U H 04 2L U 924 PP' a z < < a ' U U U U U U U a z O Z W C4 W O H O W O H O O U U O H H H H H H H O H O z 0 O x a o H C) z C CL m -1 -1 o 124 x x x x x a 0 x 0 H o C7 o H z U z F--i z o z o z a a z H E-H H H H E-i H Z o z z z z z U) H tf) W x w x w H W WWW U U U U U U U w E-H W z w H W w W > U> x> a> H H> w w w w w w w> U) > <> a o a o x o 0 a a a a a a a H a a z U U U x x w w w w w w w x a cn F-+ W w U W o 0 o m O o 0 " L1 Z N N (N m U) co U) U) U) ry) N N N 1 5 CQ x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 cr x x x z z x U U U H H H H " H H U U U o H Ca Z > > > > > > LO a as W M x 1 O O w H 11' O O O O O O Cil N M C' l0 O O O O O w O o O O O O r-1 M l0 l0 l0 O O O O O W O o o O O o l0 l0 l0 to l0 O O O o Cl rn rn rn r r r r r r r r r rn rn M 0) z O O O M M N N N N N N N O O O O Tn Ln Ln to l0 to to to to l0 l0 l0 Ln Ln r N H z ri ri r-I r♦ N M :Zr Q' C' C' I' r r-1 ri M a O to in O O in in a) LoLr) Ln in O O Ln in p H U r-F -A r-i ri . i r-1 O o o O O O o 0 0 0 0 o O o O o -4 H r-1 r-•1 r-1 H H '-i r-1 ri H r-i H H H H H H EH U) U) U) V) U) U) (!) H H H H H H H as o 0 0 o 0 o ca w W M O O O O o 0 0 0 0 H o HHHHHHH Lf) x H E-H < < < < < < < H a C7 Ll W a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U �i z z O O H H H H H H H z H O U) U) z w w x a a a x a x 3 z C4 CY• H H H H H H H ai 0 W H a Z U > o O O a a a a a a a x H a H < 0 (7 < < < < < < < � a v) 3 Q' "D U) [] w z z H H H H H H F-I F-F - W >. Qi H U) H H C4 a a a Fx a w x H a < Z z W H W W W W W W W W H a O z x z a a a a a a a a E O E a o w H w a s x x x x x x x O z O U) z o o [_.+ Ga H H H H H H H W H x H H Cra w z p > O O O O O O O O O O O o O O ...� '47 O -1 O N CV' ri ri '-1 ri r-4 '-1 1-1 N ri Ln !. p }4 r-1 o r F O O o O O O o O O CD CD CD J) • U H z > << a a a a a a a 3 a O 3 U H x r.>r H a s z z z z tx H z w U U C] Ll Cci IJ4 0032 z rn r M N In m Ln a LO 1` H • N M M M M M M N M V H M O H z N O 00 N M (1)U 0 0 U U' CD 0 0 U C7 U U (7 o W H E 2: (D Ftr W W W W W W W W W W W W a til H H H H HP H H H H H H 0 .. O O O O O O O O O O O o r-I E-H o 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O O 0 r-I z P W z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x D In In In Irn Ln In In In r rn Ln >+ O M 4 M a 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o rz o 0 P4 o 0L o z o U o 0 o Lr o Ln (9 Ln 4 Ln z u) 4 Ln 4 Ln 4 U-) Un r P4 rn C7 z O O O O O z z w M z W O H W 0 a z 0 a 0 0 Q O U)w U)Cn (1)43 o O H O O U H (n H H H Cn U U U a a > a W a > a > a > a W a a a a a Cn Q< a 4 Q< Q Q x 4 U cn S< U) z H E-+ E-+ H a E-H F 4 H < H < H a H > H E+ H H O H E-H O O x O O O O O O O Cn O x 0 O O a 0 a W H H < E-H H H a H H H E-H H H H a H H FC4 H U H H H o H O w H a O a x w O x x U O H Qz O w z x O w x Qc O w x z O rl) H x O H cz O a oc O 0 z a 0 H z a O (4 Q Q H 0 CL Q H Q H Cl H Q L4 Q z Cl fx Q H 0 H 0 z U z D z Cn z O z Cn z En z Cn z O z D z D z z z z z D H to W E-H W W W H W W W W W W W PAW £ W H W z W W W E-H W > a > > > Cn > > > > > > > co > x > a > FC > E-H > a Q z H z z z H O a w D c„ U H x H F-I H x U U a Iz U W w U W o 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 " Q pC., N N N N N N N N N N N M 1 > (Yl x x x x x x x x x x 0 x z z x U U U U U U U U U U N U H Q H cY a z a a a a a x u t.0 z Q H z FC z a Q w W m cz 1 O O w H rz o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W O o O O Cl O O O O O Cl 0 Ol Ol Ol Ql m Ol 01 Ol Ol m O Ol z 0 0 O O O O O O O O 1- 0 In to un In to In In In Ln LO l0 Ln H z ri H rl r-1 rl r-i rl rl ri rl M rl D in In O Ln to Ln O Ln o 0 �n O N N N C' m N U Ln H FC o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v, o -4 r1 -1 1-1 r--I r-i '-i r-i r1 .--I N r1 fM O o Q D a FC a x x a w w F a U) H U) H 1 rC z O h H o E z FC a O w D x U z >+ CA w W W H Q a a cn a H W CQ a H o x a FC D o a w a a w Q z o a w a w a >+ a < a w a H x a Q O H H z z H w > O H H a r~ a O Q cn a 04 >i U H z O a H W W o4 FC O a W H H O cn O U)z w U Q a h w Cl) x x E-H Ga z O W > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D O >r 0 o In -4 o ri o r1 In 0 Ln 0 In O Ln O In 11 o ri 'T 0 ►-� U E+ D O x H H D O FC a M U) W D a m W >+ W a CU O a H O x FC 0 x 1 cn �U O O rz 0033 z H �o N 00 0 • O H z N O 00 N \ � x W H H HE-4 H H a IT O .• O O O O dl O Ln E-r o 0 0 0 u-) o z w E-H z o 0 0 o r o m D Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln c N a4 N N O O O O O m O O O O O O LY) O 0 0 o H o o [� o a Ln z Ln Ln U) Ln Ln z Ln r� O W r-i O E-H H C] H O H rCi W FC W U U W a w a a Q a a a w a z H (L E-H > E- FC H X H H LL H Cla o O o U) O a 0 O O O o W H H a H H \ H U H H a H H w cz v zH au a U a > 04 v a O H O H O H O w 0 z 0 cn O H O a Ca rz 0 z 0 H 0 H C) Ca rz 0 z U z O z D z H z z z W z O z H U] W H W w x W z W z w E-1 W w > U] > > U > FC > O > cn > 1 Ca H O Lz a x H U) x U a a x Ca W (,a H O O H O fZ N N N N V CV W 0 to U kD U z H o z H U U U m x z o (� H H x < z a � as w o� a O O w H cz 0 o O O o 0 w o O 0 0 0 0 oq o O Cl 0 0 0 � rn rn rn rn Ln rn z O 0 o O cn 0 LO Ln LO U H z M n O Lrn O o Ln o O a N d c H a U U r� O H o H O H o H 0 H 0 H (n O U) O z Ln x H a O x x a a H O H S a z U) x H U) m H H H z a H o Ca a a wm a �C o u u > co c a C) rz H FCC w O cn z > Q a > x H w w z 0 > 0 O o 0 O 0 p Ln r4 o Ln o LO O >4 O O N O N o U H h o a a H Q U U U) H H > 3 0 't 7 0034 A/P - AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED 10:02AM 03/29/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK BK INVOICE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER ID DATE AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME 47723 DEF 11/15/01 47723 DEF 11/15/01 47723 DEF 11/15/01 47723 DEF 11/15/01 47723 DEF 11/15/01 47723 DEF 11/15/01 47723 DEF 11/15/01 47723 DEF 11/15/01 TOTAL VOIDED INVOICE DESCRIPTION 190391.96 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS LAW ENFORCEMENT 7307.69 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS LAW ENFORCEMENT 8001.60 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS LAW ENFORCEMENT 24428.80 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS LAW ENFORCEMENT 9146.20 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS LAW ENFORCEMENT 6498.00 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS LAW ENFORCEMENT 3777.84 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS LAW ENFORCEMENT 11819.20 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS LAW ENFORCEMENT 261,371.29 0035 A/P - AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED 08:22AM 03/28/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK BK INVOICE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER ID DATE AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME 47387 DEF 11/14/01 140.00 PIT100 NOEL PITTMAN TOTAL VOIDED 140.00 INVOICE DESCRIPTION INSTRUCTOR 0036 A/P - AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED 08:21AM 03/28/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK BK INVOICE NUMBER ID DATE 47245 DEF 10/31/01 TOTAL VOIDED VENDOR VENDOR AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME 50.00 BOU100 MICHELE BOUDREAU 50.00 INVOICE DESCRIPTION COMMUNITY SVC COMM MTNG 0037 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: April 16, 2002 Transmittal of Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: C d7 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Transmittal of Treasurer's Report dated February 28, 2002 for the City of La Quinta. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with California Government Code Section 53645 as amended 1 /1 /86; and is in conformity with City Code 3.08.010 to 3.08.070 Investment of Money and Funds. I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet next month's estimated expenditures. 7 sp tsp t ully submitted, 14 n M. Falconed, Finance Director Approved for Submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: Treasurer's Report, City of La Quinta 4 MEMORANDUM TO: La Quinta City Council FROM: John M. Falconer, Finance Director/Treasurer SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report for February 28, 2002 DATE: March 26, 2002 Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month ending February 28, 2002. The report is submitted to the City Council each month after a reconciliation of accounts is accomplished by the Finance Dept. The following table summarizes the changes in investment types for the month: Investment Beginning Purchased Notes Sold/Matured Other Ending Change Cash $12,440,231 (1) ($7,515,919) $4,924,312 ($7,515,919) LAIF $16,462,411 1,000,000 17,462,411 1,000,000 US Treasuries (2) $56,055,760 46,957,851 (45,000,000) (92,951) 57,920,660 1,864,900 US Gov't Agencies (2) $13,002,628 4,971,333 (5,000,000) 3,224 12,977,185 (25,443) Commercial Paper (2) $4,997,843 8,987,667 (5,000,000) 12,046 8,997,556 3,999,713 Mutual Funds $9,144,655 1 680,588 8,464,067 680,588 Total $112 103,528 $61 916 851 $63 196 507 $77 681 $110 746 191 $1 357 337 I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code; and is in conformity with the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the pools expenditure requirements for the next six months. the City of La Quinta used the Bureau of the Public Debt, U.S. Bank Monthly Statement and the Bank of New York Monthly Custodian Report to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. The City of La Quinta received notice in January that it was the owner of 18,339 shares of common stock in the Principal Financial Group. The shares were obtained from the demutualization of Principal Financial Group, the City's health care provider, from a privately owned company to a publicly traded company. As of February 28, 2002, the City was in the process of selling the stock, which is not a permissible investment, and which is not reflected in the above table. The common stock is being managed by Mellon Investor Services and had a market value of $446,738 on February 28, 2002. V 3 Zpa Date inance Director/Treasurer Footnote (1) The amount reported represents the net increase (decrease) of deposits and withdrawals from the previous month. (2) The amount reported in the other column represents the amortization of premium/discount for the %N month on US Treasury, Commercial Paper and Agency investments. 063. E E E L O ; fq Y C E y C_ w O y E _ a) �O N �N E CO(D E C E � � N d r c N N N U c E m0 E d � m U 0 m y � C ,Q 0 ! m2 Z IZ Z Z z z I Z Z x W j O U)C ! �$.n LO cc a c c a w� U V d °° Q C y U m ai U LL LLLL a � w U > N C N m . E 7 m y m N T i O N N N N $j jN i 0 N Q C C M ( v y C 7 7 7 ! L c ••i,•• c ` 'ate+ c N c c c c c o .3.9.9.9.9 H Q— \3: U 'mad ya 0 0 'E 'E 'E 'EE ' L o Q LO 0 $ N �K646M9�66A CO -zj �D c c 'co b ayi E v ! � I C', �4) p CM M Q z 7 0 fn > O aD O fo Ih N ! j fV O C O e oo o O c oOrjO ec;� OOpp 000.O O (n N 0 � CO O Ld M 64 69 69 o Q Q Q 4 0 y E aE o o O S $'EEEEE o 0 0 z z O 00 to `'OMfMMm M N N 69 69 69 69 69. ! y a) C C LL a ; o CD o O tOD� e O^ r-� op 0 0p 0 op O$008 00000 c'0 00 (V 04 � fo M t[j Q z cn pp po § c' o o O O o i e c u- « v $ co 64 $ "g 25 17 o ¢¢ O � f0 M co�- ui n O of 01 V! K ER C Cp C C Cp y E C= o o ° e e Q LLX �n o $ $EEEEE o N $ z a M °° o �- LnMMMLn EH fA 69646-1 co i N Q V) V y w C p N CM >.6f) Z O 0 _ d00 .4 a) to d Z m J E U ¢ J = 2- U y t C y 'O a)C .�. >4 cLL i p Z— c U. y NOS a)U O m y C m m m c fU_UC ... J _0 Q O _Q O� co _ ".' N -0 Cpp N 'D W 0 m N d C m p0� O o mca g,� N a) Q ++ m lL N M Q LL 4 •+ a� E c d �a a) y y U of -0 m y r 'm �+ p rn V tOA � m .� Q v a N Of Z O N p� O •p 3 Z vi yE*0V- 0-v< -8aMM m m ppm LL g rE w O y :� u) 7.N E m�mr+m� omdco�cc0- y�y m E �oE m m cfO Zca) d c EEg m E y c > 0 w °'ac 9EcEE E" o m o B m o a`) E >� E 0 o ` ¢ > � r y E cr EZ=JIL= E c`s m p C C m m > m U` is f0 C N E O Of (/) E a) a�i vi vi y °' U LL LL CO LL LL E o " o> > o U > g �' c t- E- U > .� a` J u'S 0 0 0 0 co0LA67 N 1A C1 00 fV - —— Q'v 4 -E-E-E15-E >� zzzzz �rii o 0 0 0`0 com mmmmo to CM N r��aom S joggggg N o o O a>$25252525 25 N fV fV [V Ol H H M N gl Cj1�GD� W � O �'o N N H H ES'u�oc�M� ao N I. - a N N N N HNw y tpp� m 7 n V N V M > aD aLo Lo C N � o e Li t'Q U. c� _ WDruQ x U yy (yy7 Ny yy W gg cc m n �Oaca E Q o 0 0 0 0 U�44ZZZ2Z (7 U07$`o`0st N E Y Y Y Ad Y a U S m a M m mmmmm 1p4 h N U. N I -qp_l- N >. LL A Q � O V O N N a8a8aaa0000sc3 ��5$$Sa8Sa8ui� y> N N N N Y N r$=Sg'g°��jjQap UU§l�2s25�g WEI ---- g s. o�_--------- G.oA N R �i 10 p1 1( N m W ct o f O ^' ci�Mmto ^�00 M M48 N J C N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C o 0 Q �O0 O� O V ^U �.jp� M M O Y �gCBCC�CC� 3FY8a aC V' N C8c s N N Cl N N 5 g N N =aaaaaaaaaaa Y! LLNiggnainr'nar'nau>a co > U G V f1 > l�E c C Y Y C Y Y W Y R t0 CO m mmm f QVjmin c�;,?�a��a�a�a mNm V1 mf4� o�2 gg� N o a UU O L O c •U c m C_ LL to •a CD C Q aci cQ E c a) 04 cc 6 C >CL CD _ON c . (D C� 0 N MCa)L m 0EE 'E U cn U LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CD O O O O O O azZZO000000cD�o 00 0000o00 O A CV N N CV Ld Ui L ��QQQMMNNMON(o� d R1��Oo00d'ONCG�O ��ZZZti�tit�►��titi►� .- T- T- Iv- r- e- N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O +O+000NNNNNNNNN O O O O O O O O O p Z Z Z 0 co co to co N w w co O O O O O O O O O O N CD 0 O CN M ti 0 w, M O M � .O O �M000r- 0)�co�D O f,f,1,r, d000r r L O O O 0) O O O (mO O d r C � U V Q N L mod•- �c ' —..aU�— 0 ezZ`zZ'z 0000.Ix> cZ yc>n Jcc>' CaaD o c cv COco U a,.r c E mUiviv)= U m wQ2»j io � m v O U LL a) 0 � � a> L O U y ca t 'v m ornma�a�a�a�cncncn � Zccaaaaa•---ct� o m z �mmmmmmmmcoco � ==a.a.aaa N a> a) 'm 7 cc,v�n'Z a () .5 ''0'o0o �a�Ma�ua� a &-"Ov2ZZzmo, m z z L Ew cn EHcm c °aQEEEEEymwa Sd E O)U O O o 0 o m m o >U- > c dEG�� > m CZL) •EEEEEujC6uj . L Q -E-.` •r- ` .` a.a.aaa»»�t O 0 0 0 0 0 0 a. Cl 0 00 00 0 Q 00 m a O O C) 0 Cl 0 Ooo000 0000 o 1 N N C M O 'p•�' 3 d m OIt0ccooccoo0 1-r-00000 O ��r-��N N N N N N N O O O O O O 000000 N N N N N N,* p ,, ; �r`coa0 O O O N N O C� N N N N N O O O O O O O 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 T- O O o 0 0 0 0 O 0 .O 0 0 0 0 g 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) r 0 0 0 0 g 0 0 r a� �rf NNdMOOiw C� N a� UU o oLL >-- ��ZZ� o00EnrZ'�'c� ii) CL o 06 CO p n vim) f° � o m m cncnE�C~� cn v� v'oc — � = " 0 c U) LL fT d c cu .O d U m O cm M w, 0)v�a�a�a`�`�`��ccav +.� Z c c a c. a .- � U —0 a a mUvaaa U) u,s 0 c�-.r•� 0•- C.VZ ••V zz = N m Z Z "CD a- a> Eu,E c 06 QEEEm �d c 00 U)m cU�UUU oa c E a UU E E Eu)u�ui �zvaLaLaL»>�� N—f- O O O O cvi 00 0 C 0W (DCOt O T- � O f C4 C31— ti o CO m O CO s�sa c � O C G C m U E `cu = 0 L QD 3 .E m :3 o co: cm c ol c N E m IL C a in Lu E _ a N C c a) d o E0ccow C > •N C *am-- E a .. Es c > o�NO� c m c 0 _=aa_5:DM VU�.i LO e- M0) C) tio�y0OO a0� OCC000 NO~OCOO. �CO�04 -M CO y N y0�N OMO� 't0C%0OjOOd �00OLO 0 MO.�j CO O F M� y 04-0 N r' N N M W p NI-- Q O NO ��4 N N O CO) 00 0 0) M a .- cu ED Q NCM M (D M C d COO_ �CONOle 'O LL C LL O C N y0 C CO 0) >` LL C LL E C E R O) N c d r O 3 LL N LL y 2 L � LL CT O N J 0 Ci> > LL W 7 N� 7 C U W O c 'C y c N a O U c w h .6 c > > > > r o N 4) LL�(L U O�L3 2O' U y CQ t� E O 2 N a._ E Z78 _ 3 Q o co �. Cti U Z a ,,_ �E 8�C `�-Nrn d d a)me C a� as W E n rn� €v y� C N ._ 2 o a O o c CD C0 7 go — a +r N � � Q O CO 2 3 UA •a 41 a�°� 3 O O O di C o ►. � z CU U) to C ci(9Oa.SiteC000WCJH Q.' UDJ LLdc F .- .% c oa oC, [Z O L C UUu O N co N n Cl) cli M C~D Ci t- co N ii OI On N0)MLO)OW h h 0) 0? 00 p N H N aO '1 O� O�0O � Lo t- O) P cp t j n N 1, MMMn� - - -MCMD N v N �Oti LO 00N ON�MNC w t0 "' {O yNONI fV CO t`Lq NAa 00000N-- � � 1, COO U. p Mw04 C. 'f COM�N(D)O N M QO A r' O �Nt� AON Lo co Cl) O) WNcODLoON MMOMNf� CA) CO w� OLn n) ti O Orl- �n 0) V NN04 r- N M U. CO or- W f`� M00��.-� M N of W O HN w n O W N CO )O to LO M m N 1- N �Or. a) V NiOtO 1� ��st Ofee}�}N � �w00) co w Kf n O iO A ONE �p U. w )O O tD w�O GoO M O) co p M .- N .- h dNA M)O ODD )O LOO co MAN In NO V O� to N)1')�� MMOO Mf��O)� �MMODNM O) t0 r' O) t0 ��CD U. LO wOLo ODOcq C CjvNMIZ 00 NC000 Mee-NMOD t00� n W � CO d yNA 0 nwC tM0 10 IOOMtO f M O V Nm OtA�nO CO 0 V 0 r, 0 0 M Of M 0 U. n O N O M •- N NM Of OD O st ap M •- T K Of N of C) O N d U 0 Ol M �O<`'>W0 M M m 0) CD M NMN�O� N M It tb w M n It d N A C C O r- O n O1 O M t� )O O N N a�N O O f� •' �---N{0U. of �O NO O U,2 � Mt--00)NO M Co lO )6 � O N W- co Ol O � a N m M lO 0 M M MMO�NO N " M co M QO)l1 Nr-00)O 0m)vw0R— O) — N f`^ CD�N((D aO NtDaI�N� M ..� M C C C E y) co 7 O j C L ~ C m U) to V E N C C C i0 C U m X (Cp O O V CO a C N d J X .�+ C IL I) 10 I� ti ac.� a� W u0i m c U O y LL E Xu C)'C c c O�a) Uw c m� CL �0 )w�c 0_ a O o 0 1 ac o 0) aa00.0 4) O y . > .0rab m It m a �iwn w8Ua �ao z UC lz C O E V If O a d O O C m U O Z N v C O a w 087 4 8 v� g> as a as a a a "'333 r O p O a O Q o 0 o O $ O Q O 3PgOO�OV Z 000000 ZNHOO Zy►NH�Oi►HO ZHOO Vl co 0 SP le V x a N HNN� V+Vl N&-k NO N YY m �p O y� Of N off to No 4Y N ^00 V ON f0 V CD V h�^N ;Z �V�VI'7N y�y�1�1^ NNNNNO Nt°� � ry cm Y Z 0 0 Z y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CDN2.- < Z N H N H N N H N N N M O O 00 �p N �pNi P1C ^�•^-tA�VV pcl 1 0� V Of rLo �C�1�� O O Q p Q O O a i dOrnsc�vrn OM`8 M _ 'ioA Go N A a m Y O M O O r N N Ol p� �aa IyI @ �g V I- O W f^O� �rj p�D f ci f7 Go M Z ~ o�aaaaaaa aaa uuutcuuu�srocuu j ry N N N N N W N CN1 d N > » »rrrr>rrN N y d (a Naia_u�iaigaiaaia T N. ��$UgOUOU OU 5 u. a ca Ilia aicl Ica y{ a y~ aV)mw mNmVlm(n2 H � �� 7N NfA7yfn7fnjV)j K m'V1 F U U •- N U� r, 6u 3 � �O000clr�(o �rn��Morn � �oomincnM N (D 0� LA M Lc) M qT M lA Q p,(DOMO) O(D Q lnrN�00t` MqTNM Lc) u 1�t1 vo?gQp?ofrIR RtANtAI-c)w OocohNr(1) (D � oQoQoQ�QOoQ O Lt7 tf) M t` �NtAtn00tA0 L0Nrrr N r �p 00 (D n ice) (Dr w(Dl�tO� (D tp oe oe `oQ oe oe R oe o� o of a2 31�OI�MI�1� CCr) (D0)OONO �(OM'qM Nr" C(7000 r(? N r r r cM ' cD to (O LA cc; e� IV N aR oe 00 M v00v 000 q v�fv(Dm� Q N r N r M Q tD LA (D to tD (DOONOrOV OLA000NM >oF-vm o ��NefM r lA e- Z M r N (7 woeo�oeoeN� o q 01,- f-M o RNM(MO" O Nq "rl-LQ ZQ V NMN M Qw(D(DcDNcD 0) yM000tnM0 ++(DNG�(?'TN y N w(MMM 0) y'VMrW 0 +•(7N(?NNIn y(O(O0(O w N j oe oe a4 02 3 oQ OR o oQUOR N �tnNCDV)W) O O r CD r 0 jTrMMNq Q v ch M cM vt Q (D (6 to 0 co O oe oe ZR * OR p * * Of oR oQ >.tn 75I":QMttQ(D 000000V 0 I-I-r00 NIT 5q-: 7NN'T 3RMIVM li -)(D(D(D(D w cC cc 0) 0) 0) 0) E E C C . lNQ 4),9 O w O N UQUQ H _ > 0) Lp C _ > d c d aa12 au alxw 000= m 000= M €N m m m �- E E 3 .2 W W W E P. m 2"� w w w - Z CY M C N 000420 N N w z m w CO `� 'C O O ►� ltf N lti 3 3 3 2 la lQ N O O cc 7 7 3 g 2 N U=Ii C C C x pl � Q¢QcQ>5 C C C X y LL ¢Q`QinQ>>� 08.E N 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 7 c 00 0 0 to cO 70to1- co 0) 0 0 0 0 0 m C80occLOcoM � N 1p O tIq I- Cl) to ri It m to C 0 0 0 0 o Q cOOM000O QC0'toI�00I-- to v to c) tri t L o 0 0 0 0 m m0000I�N�0 M0Nto1�000 �lo�tA� lA �000 � 0 000 0 0 0 2coOtn�jMl� 2�coa0c0�1� MNtnM tn0 ACV -�, N �MOOCO�� cotoc0� co cp0000 0 m 00"t 0 � I- O I- cn I- 1- cM000)OONO O 0 M q cf) cM000� M 'Nr-e .— M 'cCtoOOtc) OO 0 0 0 0 0 (D o 0-pp 0 0 CR ccq ��0~ rr-cM QN�cV co )CDLOCOuA co E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tn000NM co00N O M N CM Z O cO O cD cO f0 Z 0 q0r--I-0 V O N to O N I� 0000M N V'It N M CM N cn O'i'NMN CM 0000co 0 N E «�tCOONMMIt N 0 000 0 4 M M CM y e 000 0pp y NM04C-4 N co c0 cO c0 6 j0o 00 o :03 00c140 00N0Mtnln O O 0 pp M- M M M to 7� N a � cn cn cn Q co co co co c0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 q cO I� h.—OON 3Ci co CO 0 (0 co yy _ C cc y .., c C) C c Y y C N .. c y (D UQ v UQ n �— > �— a) a ii Q d ii Q c 0 0 o m o 0 o m y y y N y y y C 0) 0) EE'y c NM :3 0 N M j W W U J w N M M N 7 UJJ W� — N N N t N N N d t w J C N c0 0 0 4' N C N N cU m cp 0 d' 0 o 2 > > >2 i2U- �� U- `D a)c c c x >— c c c.x >— �_U- aaacnag aaac0ag �000 T0•c a,� V _ Incouvxnity y�� 5 OF9ti AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: April 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Transmittal of Revenue and Expenditure Report for February 28, 2002 and Investment Summary Report for the Quarter Ending March 31, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Transmittal of the Statement of Revenue and Expenditures for February 28, 2002 and Investment Summary Report for the Quarter ending March 31, 2002 for the City of La Quinta. specoplly submit*d, Johr-'M. Falcdner,/Finance Director Approved for submission y: (/-,.0 it Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Revenue and Expenditures for February 28, 2002 and Investment Summary Report dated March 31, 2002 CITY OF LA QUINTA REVENUES - ALL FUNDS 07/01/2001 - 02/28/2002 FUNDS BUDGET RECEIVED RECEIVED General $14,3321929.75 $97671,960.64 67.5% Library 95,000.00 87,913.18 92.5% Gas Tax Revenue 435,318.27 339,947.25 78.1 % Cmaq/lstea 287,423.00 0.00 0.0% Federal Assistance 543,825.00 305,617.99 56.2% Assessment District 2000-1 0.00 10,712.62 0.0% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 102,391.75 101,263.98 98.9% Local Law Enforcement 27,004.00 27,169.77 100.6% Lighting & Landscaping 781,400.00 407,576.75 52.2% Quimby 16,500.00 137,129.00 831.1 % Infrastructure 11,000.00 79,759.50 725.1 % Village Parking 100.00 0.00 0.0% South Coast Air Quality 24,481.00 15,685.04 64.1 % LQ Public Safety Officer 21200.00 21263.39 102.9% Interest Allocation 0.00 322,353.43 0.0% Capital Improvement 55,893,647.10 8,115,061.68 14.5% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 450.90 0.0% Urban Forestry 11,000.00 0.00 0.0% Equipment Replacement 363,180.00 351,402.28 96.8% Information Technology 1,000,000.00 1,015,575.40 101.6% Arts In Public Places 132,900.00 85,889.34. 64.6% Transportation 307,100.00 484,331.50 157.7% Parks & Recreation 221,500.00 276,547.10 124.9% Civic Center 323,100.00 397,695.17 123.1 % Library Development 167,900.00 163,602.42 97.4% Community Center 58,600.00 73,675.54 125.7% Street Facility 10,500.00 15,009.05 142.9% Park Facility 3,200.00 4,145.35 129.5% La Quinta Financing Authority 688,130.00 492,862.09 71.6% RDA Project Area No. 1 80,489,860.00 69,567,099.14 86.4% RDA Project Area No. 2 11,376,903.00 5,067,065.82 44.5% Total $167,707 092.87 $97,619,765.32 58.2% 00 0 `t"J' CITY OF LA QUINTA EXPENDITURES - ALL FUNDS 07/01/2001 - 02/28/2002 FUNDs BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED REMAINING BUDGET % EXPENDED General $15,564,308.75 $7,471,394.00 $116,617.92 $7,976,296.83 48.0% Library 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Gas Tax 594,378.00 281,066.64 0.00 313,311.36 47.3% Cmaq/Istea 287,423.00 0.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.0% Federal Assistance 166,638.99 31,813.99 0.00 134,825.00 19.1 % Proposed Assessment District 682,553.47 259,548.88 0.00 423,004.59 38.0% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 100,191.75 0.00 0.00 100,191.75 0.0% Local Law Enforcement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Lighting & Landscaping 781,400.00 520,933.36 0.00 260,466.64 66.7% Quimby 382,806.29 149,800.33 0.00 233,005.96 39.1 % Infrastructure 2,456,370.34 388,465.39 0.00 2,067,904.95 15.8% Village Parking (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% South Coast Air Quality 0.00 4,836.69 0.00 (4,836.69) 0.0% Lq Public Safety Officer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Interest Allocation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Capital Improvement 55,893,647.03 8,115,061.67 3,952.43 47,774,632.93 14.5% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 63,579.59 0.00 (63,579.59) 0.0% Urban Forestry 11,000.00 0.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.0% Equipment Replacement 380,209.00 113,253.68 6,546.50 260,408.82 29.8% Arts In Public Places 689,515.71 36,417.50 0.00 653,098.21 5.3% Transportation 2,850,019.03 296,662.57 0.00 2,553,356.46 10.4% Parks & Recreation 4,508,263.00 201,504.01 0.00 4,306,758.99 4.5% Civic Center 204,660.00 136,440.00 0.00 68,220.00 66.7% Library Development 623,324.00 20,775.72 0.00 602,548.28 3.3% Community Center 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Street Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Park Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Information Technology 476,372.00 213,901.00 33,657.05 228,813.95 44.9% La Quinta Financing Authority 1,209,498.78 488,259.00 0.00 721,239.78 40.4% RDA Project Area No. 1 50,402,942.46 34,197,130.43 0.00 16,205,812.03 67.8% RDA Project Area No. 2 16,691,594.44 6,696,639.57 6,400.00 9,988,554.87 40.1 % Total $154 955,223.19 $59,687,484.02 $167,173.90 $95,100,565.27 38.5% 0 t; C CITY OF LA QUINTA GENERAL FUND REVENUES DETAIL TAXES: Property Tax No Low Property Tax Distribution Document Transfer Tax Sales Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Franchise Tax TOTAL TAXES LICENSE & PERMITS: Business License Animal License Building Permits Plumbing Permits Electrical Permits Mechanical Permits Misc. Permits TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS FEES: Sale of Maps & Publications Community Services Fees Bldg & Safety Fees Community Development Fees Public Works Fees TOTALFEES INTERGOVERNMENTAL Motor Vehicle In -Lieu Motor Vehicle Code Fines Parking Violations Misc. Fines AB939 State of California Grant CSA152 Assessment TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL INTEREST MISCELLANEOUS Miscellaneous Revenue Cash Over/(Short) TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFER IN TOTAL GENERAL FUND 07/01/2001 - 02/28/2002 REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 520,600.00 346,937.85 173,662.15 66.640% 450,600.00 375,615.94 74,984.06 83.360% 380,000.00 256,171.22 123,828.78 67.410% 3,217,500.00 2,088,121.66 1,129,378.34 64.900% 3,595,000.00 1,701,715.39 1,893,284.61 47.340% 537,500.00 218,835.68 318,664.32 40.710% 8,701,200.00 4,987,397.74 3,713,802.26 57.320% 152,000.00 104,906.60 47,093.40 69.020% 12,400.00 7,655.25 4,744.75 61.740% 412,500.00 806,022.60 (393,522.60) 195.400% 89,400.00 130,426.08 (41,026.08) 145.890% 68,000.00 137,088.22 (69,088.22) 201.600% 37,000.00 74,314.52 (37,314.52) 200.850% 48,300.00 33,131.98 15,168.02 68.600% 819,600.00 1,293,545.25 (473,945.25) 157.830% 2,150.00 607.43 1,542.57 28.250% 157,825.00 111,571.51 46,253.49 70.690% 357,950.00 512,166.34 (154,216.34) 143.080% 222,000.00 147,683.66 74,316.34 66.520% 468,550.00 371,854.94 96,695.06 79.360% 1,208,475.00 1,143,883.88 64,591.12 94.660% 1,257,600.00 836,904.23 420,695.77 66.550% 50,300.00 21,468.40 28,831.60 42.680% 25,000.00 36,397.00 (11,397.00) 145.590% 5,000.00 8,673.46 (3,673.46) 173.470% 159,900.00 106,527.94 53,372.06 66.620% 134,105.00 72,038.80 62,066.20 53.720% 126,700.00 32,309.17 94,390.83 25.500% 1,758,605.00 1,114,319.00 644,286.00 63.360% 1,535,600.00 1,122,125.32 413,474.68 73.070% 27,700.00 10,806.16 16,893.84 39.010% 0.00 (116.71) 116.71 0.000% 27,700.00 10,689.45 17,010.55 38.590% 281,749.75 0.00 281,749.75 0.000% 14,332,929.75 9,671,960.64 4,660,969.11 67.480% 0u5 CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL LIBRARY: County of Riverside Interest TOTAL LIBRARY GAS TAX REVENUE: Section 2105 Section 2106 Section 2107 Section 2107.5 Traffic Congestion Relief Interest TOTAL GAS TAX CMAQ/ISTEA CMAQ/ISTEA Grant Interest TOTAL CMAQ/ISTEA FEDERAL ASSISTANCE REVENUE: CDBG Grant Interest TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1 Interest Assessment Bond Proceeds Prepayments -sewer assessments Transfer in TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SLESF (COPS) REVENUE: SLESF (Cops) Funding Interest TOTAL SLESF (COPS) LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT REVENUE: LLEBG Funding Interest Transfer in TOTAL LLEBG LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING REVENUE: Assessment Developer Interest TOTAL LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING QUIMBY REVENUE: Quimby Fees Interest TOTAL QUIMBY REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 75,000.00 75,000.00 0.00 100.000% 20,000.00 12,913.18 7,086.82 64.570% 95,000.00 87,913.18 7,086.82 92.540% 135,600.00 95,538.57 40,061.43 70.460% 98,200.00 65,291.33 32,908.67 66.490% 175,100.00 126,257.40 48,842.60 72.110% 5,000.00 6,000.00 (1,000.00) 120.000% 13,718.27 39,324.42 (25,606.15) 286.660% 7,700.00 7,535.53 164.47 97.860% 435,318.27 339,947.25 95,371.02 78.090% 287,423.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 287,423.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.000% 543,825.00 305,617.99 238,207.01 56.200% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 543,825.00 305 617.99 238 207.01 56.200% 10,712.62 (10,712.62) 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 10,712.62 (10,712.62) 0.000% 100,191.75 100,191.75 0.00 100.000% 2,200.00 1,072.23 1,127.77 48.740% 102 391.75 101 263.98 1,127.77 98.900% 26,704.00 26,704.00 0.00 100.000% 300.00 465.77 (165.77) 155.260% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 27,004.00 27,169.77 (165.77) 100.610% 781,400.00 407,576.75 373,823.25 52.160% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 781 400.00 407 576.75 373,823.25 52.160% 126,375.00 (126,375.00) 0.000% 16,500.00 10,754.00 5,746.00 65.180% 16,500.00 137,129.00 (120,629.00) 831.080% U U t16 CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) INFRASTRUCTURE REVENUE: Infrastructure Fee Interest Transfer in TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE VILLAGE PARKING REVENUE: Interest TOTAL VILLAGE PARKING SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY REVENUE: S.C.A.Q. Contribution Interest TOTALSCAQ LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER FUND Transfer In Interest TOTAL LQ PUBLIC SAFETY INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND: Pooled Cash Allocated Interest Transfer In TOTAL INTEREST ALLOCATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: CVAG CVWD County of Riverside State of Ca- Office Emer. Services JPIA IID DSUSD State of California SB300 Funding Surface Transportation SB821-Bicycle Path Grant APP Contribution Developer Agreement Funding Transfers in From Other Funds TOTAL CIP REVENUE LQ NORTE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: Prepayment Bond Proceeds Interest TOTAL LQ NORTE CIP URBAN FORESTRY Grant Revenue Interest TOTAL URBAN FORESTRY REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 11,000.00 0.00 0.00 79,759.50 0.00 0.00 (68,759.50) 0.00 0.000% 725.090% 0.000% 11,000.00 79,759.50 (68,759.50) 725.090% 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.000% 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.000% 21,881.00 2,600.00 14,510.09 1,174.95 7,370.91 1,425.05 66.310% 45.190% 24,481.00 15,685.04 8,795.96 64.070% 2,000.00 200.00 2,000.00 263.39 0.00 (63.39) 100.000% 131.700% 2,200.00 2,263.39 (63.39) 102.880% 322,353.43 0.00 (322,353.43) 0.00 0.000% 0.000% 0.00 322,353.43 (322,353.43) 0.000% 13,655,958.18 2,399,662.12 11,256,296.06 17.570% 1,709,906.00 0.00 1,709,906.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 100.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 530,600.00 0.00 530,600.00 0.000% 19,365.74 0.00 19,365.74 0.000% 12,000,118.00 0.00 12,000,118.00 0.000% 93,175.00 0.00 93,175.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 182,142.84 59,149.77 122,993.07 32.470% 27,677,381.34 5,631,249.79 22,046,131.55 20.350% 55 893,647.10 8,115,061.68 47,778,585.42 14.520% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 450.90 (450.90) 0.000% 0.00 450.90 (450.90) 0.000% 11,000.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 11,000.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.000% V``11 � v (; 7 CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND: Equipment Charges Capital Contribution Interest Transfers In TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 304,980.00 304,982.00 (2.00) 100.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 58,200.00 46,420.28 11,779.72 79.760% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 363,180.00 351,402.28 11,777.72 96.760% INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND: Charges for services 0.00 0.00 0.000% Capital Contribution 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 15,575.40 (15,575.40) 0.000% Transfers In 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 100.000% _ TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1,000,000.00 1,015,575.40 (15,575.40) 101.560% ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES REVENUE: Arts in Public Places Arts in Public Places Credits Applied Interest TOTAL ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES TRANSPORTATION Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL TRANSPORTATION PARKS & RECREATION Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION CIVIC CENTER Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL CIVIC CENTER LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY CENTER Developer fees Interest TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 111,300.00 71,293.65 40,006.35 64.060% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 21,600.00 14,595.69 7,004.31 67.570% 132,900.00 85 889.34 47,010.66 64.630% 284,000.00 410,537.77 (126,537.77) 144.560% 23,100.00 73,793.73 (50,693.73) 319.450% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 307,100.00 484,331.50 (177,231.50) 157.710% 201,000.00 253,588.00 (52,588.00) 126.160% 20,500.00 22,959.10 (2,459.10) 112.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 221,500.00 276,547.10 (55,047.10) 124.850% 284,500.00 371,003.55 (86,503.55) 130.410% 38,600.00 26,691.62 11,908.38 69.150% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 323,100.00 397,695.17 (74,595.17) 123.090% 150,000.00 149,117.00 883.00 99.410% 17,900.00 14,485.42 3,414.58 80.920% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 167,900.00 163,602.42 4,297.58 97.440% 53,500.00 67,569.00 (14,069.00) 126.300% 5,100.00 6,106.54 (1,006.54) 119.740% 58 600.00 73 675.54 (15,075.54) 125.730% CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) STREET FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL STREET FACILITY PARK FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL PARK FACILITY REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 9,500.00 13,662.29 (4,162.29) 143.810% 1,000.00 1,346.76 (346.76) 134.680% 10,500.00 15,009.05 (4,509.05) 142.940% 3,000.00 3,789.00 (789.00) 126.300% 200.00 356.35 (156.35) 178.180% 3,200.00 4,145.35 (945.35) 129.540% 010 0119 07/01 /2001 - 02/28/2002 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REMAINING % BY DEPARTMENT BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED GENERAL GOVERNMENT: LEGISLATIVE 585,800.00 257,649.51 0.00 328,150.49 44.0% CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 613,200.00 343,776.09 483.75 268,940.16 56.1 % ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 935,000.00 535,799.47 399,200.53 57.3% PERSONNEL/RISK MGT 572,872.00 450,258.21 0.00 122,613.79 78.6% TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 2,706,872.00 1,587,483.28 483.75 1,118,904.97 58.6% FINANCE: FISCAL SERVICES 542,515.00 349,493.22 0.00 193,021.78 64.4% CENTRAL SERVICES 311,205.00 162,419.43 20,796.00 127,989.57 52.2% TOTAL FINANCE 853,720.00 511,912.65 20.796.00 321,011.35 60.0% CITY CLERK 373,650.00 219,322.57 154,327.43 58.7% COMMUNITY SERVICES SENIOR CENTER 265,475.00 149,403.90 4,213.62 111,857.48 56.3% PARKS & RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 812,058.00 369,512.00 8,049.03 434,496.97 45.5% PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAMS 90,800.00 34.569.52 0.00 56,230.48 38.1 % TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 1,168,333.00 553,485.42 12,262.65 602,584.93 47.4% POLICE 4,189,385.75 1,154,740.15 39,220.52 2,995,425.08 27.6% BUILDING & SAFETY: BUILDING & SAFETY - ADMIN 179,700.00 117,536.87 0.00 62,163.13 65.4% CODE COMPLIANCE 478,484.00 255,849.84 0.00 222,634.16 53.5% ANIMAL CONTROL 166,043.00 93,330.42 0.00 72,712.58 56.2% BUILDING 713,488.00 418,417.27 0.00 295,070.73 58.6% EMERGENCY SERVICES 96,524.00 69,370.06 9,040.00 18,113.94 71.9% FIRE 67,278.00 12,208.84 0.00 55,069.16 18.1% CIVIC CENTER BUILDING -OPERATIONS 1,088,751.00 795,073.13 0.00 293,677.87 73.0% TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY 2,790,268.00 1,761,786.43 9,040.00 1,019,441.57 63.1% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - ADMIN 472,450.00 241,536.72 0.00 230,913.28 51.1 % CURRENT PLANNING 759,807.00 331,998.99 0.00 427,808.01 43.7% TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,232,257.00 573,535.71 0.00 658,721.29 46.5% PUBLIC WORKS: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 286,100.00 170,021.45 1,000.00 115,078.55 59.4% DEVELOPMENT & TRAFFIC 943,668.00 527,524.09 7,900.00 408,243.91 55.9% MAINT/OPERATIONS- STREETS 1,431,059.00 373,410.61 13,740.00 1,043,908.39 26.1% MAINT/OPERATIONS - LTG/LANDSCAPING 1,359,699.00 800,683.57 12,175.00 546,840.43 58.9% CAPITAL PROJECTS 387,420.00 116,671.27 0.00 270,748.73 30.1 % TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 4,407,946.00 1.988,310.99 34,815.00 2,384,820.01 45.1% TRANSFERS OUT 1,829,441.00 1,180,523.06 0.00 648,917.94 64.5% GENERAL FUND REIMBURSEMENTS (3,987,564.00) (2,059,706.26) 0.00 (1,927,857.74) 51.7% NET GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 15,564,308.75 7,471,394.00 116 617.92 7,976,296.83 48.0% 0 010 CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2001 - 02/28/2002 OTHER CITY FUNDS REMAINING % EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED LIBRARY FUND: PROJECT EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% GAS TAX REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 421,600.00 281,066.64 0.00 140,533.36 66.7% TRANSFER OUT 172,778.00 0.00 0.00 172,778.00 0.0% REIMBURSE GE TOTAL GAS TAX 594 378.00 281 066.64 0.00 313 311.36 47.3% QUIMBY FUND: TRANSFER OUT 382 806.29 149,800.33 0.00 233,005:96 39.1 % FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND: TRANSFER OUT 166 638.99 31 813.99 0.00 134 825.00 19.1 % SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 4,836.69 0.00 (4,836.69) 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 0.00 4,836.69 0.00 (4,836.69) 0.0% CMAQ/ISTEA TRANSFER OUT 287 423.00 0.00 0.00 287 423.00 0.0% VILLAGE Parking TRANSFER OUT (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRIBUTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% LLEBG FUND TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% SLESF (COPS) TRANSFER OUT 100 191.75 0.00 0.00 100 191.75 0.0% LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DIST: REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 781,400.00 520,933.36 0.00 260,466.64 66.7% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL LTG/LANDSCAPING FUND 781,400.00 520 933.36 0.00 260 466.64 66.7% INFRASTRUCTURE FUND CONSTRUCTION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 2,456,370.34 388,465.39 0.00 2,067,904.95 15.8% TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE 2,456,370.34 388 465.39 0.00 2,067,904.95 15.8% ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1 COSTS OF ISSUANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER TO AGENCY FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 682,553.47 259,548.88 0.00 423,004.59 38.0% TOTAL AD 2000-1 682 553.47 259 548.88 0.00 423 004.59 38.0% CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2001 - 02/28/2002 OTHER CITY FUNDS REMAINING % EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 2,850,019.03 296,662.57 0.00 2,553,356.46 10.4% TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 2,850,019.03 296,662.57 0.00 2,553,356.46 10.4% PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 4,508,263.00 201,504.01 0.00 4,306,758.99 4.5% TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 4,508,263.00 201 504.01 0.00 4,306,758.99 4.5% CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 204,660.00 136,440.00 0.00 68.220.00 66.7% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL CIVIC CENTER 204 660.00 136 440.00 0.00 68 220.00 66.7% LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 623,324.00 20,775.72 0.00 602,548.28 3.3% TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 623 324.00 20,775.72 0.00 602,548.28 3.3% COMMUNITY CENTER PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% _ TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% STREET FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL STREET FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% PARK FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL PARK FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 54,665,202.26 7,925,259.41 3,952.43 46,735,990.42 14.5% PROJECT REIMBURSEMENTS TO GEN FUND 1,228,444.77 189,802.26 0.00 1,038,642.51 15.5% TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 55 893 647.03 8,115,061.67 3,952.43 47 774 632.93 14.5% ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND MAINTENANCE EXPENSES-APP 2,000.00 1,550.00 0.00 450.00 77.5% OPERATING EXPENSES-APP 5,000.00 (785.00) 0.00 5,785.00 -15.7% ART PURCHASES 265,340.00 27,737.50 0.00 237,602.50 10.5% TRANSFER OUT 417,175.71 7,915.00 0.00 409,260.71 1.9% TOTAL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES 689 515.71 36 417.50 0.00 653,098.21 5.3% LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND PROJECT EXPENSES 0.00 4,176.20 0.00 (4,176.20) 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 59 403.39 0.00 (59,403.39) 0.0% TOTAL LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND 0.00 63 579.59 0.00 (63,579.59) 0.0% URBAN FORESTRY GRANT TRANSFER OUT 11 000.00 0.00 0.00 11 000.00 0.0% VILLAGE PARKING TRANSFER OUT (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 476,372.00 213 901.00 33 657.05 228 813.95 44.9% EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 380 209.00 113 253.68 6,546.50 260 408.82 29.8% 1 !_j 012 CD 0 C O 0 LL 1 cu E co C a� (no > > O C) C N cv >. J C co O r- U U C7 2 N O co to U 00 qtd 0 OCV) OI�-cMcntn00 10 �_ 0 co Cn � LO T- 1f) � 1- 00 to 1- 0 N N N OOMI`Ln0 OCAMNMLONN 00 O O) O co 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 00 1- 00 N 00 Cn Cn CA Cn Cn CA 0 Cn O Cn Cn 0 O) O N CA O 4c'i44,Cl) Cl) .07 coV) A 41 OMOO�t1� O 1NCt,f�00com 0mF-00 0M0ww0LnO� Il-La�A > ►-- OcMN�tMOOOnN(NNcL000CV-1-(O - 1, 00�00001`CnOOON 0AC1-�00 tj NIA ` 0)0)0)CnOCnO000)a)omONCn CnCn��4M"BCD d � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � N ti > 00-OOOOOOOOOOOI-NI` 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O N 00 ea 0)000000000000 Naj a � 0� 0 0 (V �- r- N N LO M LO , (O LA O O O O O O O ca c� m CLM aaaaaM M 0 MOO`'MOO�OOOp(jZZ c c m o o 0 O UC.) an.aaa +� t4 = 00 = CU (0 N N (C F.. ZOmOma-da.a.d O O (?0a-a. E �moco mM4)4) oo zz— �an Nt`-Nfo`-EEEEE inv� cu co 0 0 0 0 0 c UUUUU C 6 O •- to -p '0 00 5 C C O N V _� L- O 0 M u N 0 c C1 0 N C 02mQEE E U �o0OCD o o > > H V a >,L J J O C C i ai N N w C6 a s ) 0 m Gci (0 f0 fO N O c CA 0 f`��U m o E c`o > O CDO N N m to O N !n fn Cn fn (n y O N N O O O =iC7mCL2ULLLLLLJJVi a M M ti 00 00 O � O a) aD mm Q Q 0 0 J J 00 (O CD co M LO N to 69 co C O N O c v N O a U 0 H � C c m o 0 � fu J L O U U N a a� O ai O O N C V m of°CU c E c v,co o 0 m v o E a 0 cc y 0O >0 E C V c >, fU O cu Cy N c n a� L 00 ,y e- N a� rn > 0 c * Y) i 4) O LL 0 2 L,r COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: April 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Approval of a Request by the California Public Employees Retirement System (CaIPERS) to Utilize the Council Chambers for a Financial Planning Seminar for Retirees, June 11 and November 21, 2002, 8:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve the request by CaIPERS to utilize the Council Chambers for a Financial Planning Seminar for Retirees on June 11 and November 21, 2002, 8:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. In accordance with the Guidelines for Use of Civic Center Facility, facility fees are not applicable. None. CaIPERS has requested that the Council Chambers be made available for a Financial Planning Seminar for Retirees on June 11 and November 21, 2002, 8:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. The request meets all the requirements of the facility use as contained in the City's Guidelines (Attachment 1). Complete applications have been submitted (Attachment 2) for the City Council 's consideration. 10 The alternatives available to City Council include: 1. Approve the request by the California Public Employees Retirement System (CaIPERS) to utilize the Council Chambers for a Financial Planning Seminar for retirees on June 11 and November 21, 2002, 8:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.; or 2. Do not approve the request from the California Public Employees Retirement System (CaIPERS) to utilize the Council Chambers; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, o� Tom Hartung Director of Building & Safety Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. City Guidelines 2. Application ATTACHMENT 1 crrr OF L& QU=r A GtTIDzimms FOR ZTSE OF CMC CSHT'SR FACILM •I:16 A I _ • M § - 1. Council Chamber - seats 106. 2. Study Session Room - seats 33. 3. Groups are to use the Study Session Room unless. the • size* of the' group- or the need for audio-visual equipment necessitates use of the Council Chamber. II. CITY USE OF CIVIC CSNTLR 1. The primary use of the Council Chamber and Study Session Room is for the conduct of meetings for the entities listed below: a) City Council b) Planning Commission c) Community Services.Commission d) Design Review Board- e) Art in Public Places f) Investment Task Force g) Other City appointed boards, commissions and committees 1. Other non-profit and Governmental Agencies, 501(c) entities, that serve residents of La Quinta, may be granted permission by the City Council to use the facilities. 1. A person or group desiring to use Civic Center facilities must file an Application for Use Permit with the City Manager's Office. Applications must be completed and submitted.at least three calendar weeks prior to the scheduled event, unless otherwise waived by the City Council. 0014 2. All qualified groups using the Council Chamber and Study Session Room must have $500,000 general liability insurance coverage per occurrence, ar; nQ the City of T - r+..: gAitinnatl named insured. Groups that do not have insurance may purchase special event insurance through the City's insurance policy. 3. All applicants must indemnify and hold the City harmless from any and all losses and/or claims. Indemnification -forms will be provided by the City and must accompany submittal of the Use Permit Application:: ` 4. Users of the Council Chamber and Study Session Room will be responsible for all damage to the building, appurtenances thereto, and shall be responsible for reimbursement to the City for any loss or damage to City property caused by such use. 5. The City must be notified as soon as possible of any cancellations, so that the facility may be reassigned. 6. Approval shall be granted by the City Council. The City Manager is authorized to permit a use when the Council meeting schedule precludes Council* consideration in a timely manner. Approved permits will be issued to the person filing the application prior to the event. 7. In the interest of widest community use of the Civic Center facilities, no one non-profit community group shall use the facility more than eight ( 8 ) hours per month.* 1. The City shall charge for after hours use of Civic Center facilities. Said charge is to recover full cost for use of the facility (personnel, equipment, electricity, etc.) and shall be paid prior to the use. The hourly rate shall be established by the Council during the City's Annual Budget Review process. * Governmental Agencies are exempt from this requirement. Vv5 2. A refundable cleaning deposit is required. The City may withhold . all, or a .portion, of the deposit if cleanup is required. The deposit will be established based on the use as follows:* (a) Session Room = $200 (b) Council Chambers (up to-53 people) _ $300 (c) Council Chambers (54 people plus) _ $500 VI. c+Tvrc� K SO Pr�1►I't _ 1. City owned audio visual and public address equipment may be used, provided City staff is responsible for its operation. 1. Any proposed use of the Council Chamber or Study Session Room =sau1= y scheduled shall not meet lead to the ? ng . cancellation of a 2. For non -City functions, use of the Chamber and Study Session Room shall not be prior to a a.m. or extend beyond 10 p.m. 3. Food, water, and.beverages shall not be consumed in the Civic Center facilities. 4. Smoking shall not be permitted anywhere in the Civic Center. 5. Juvenile organizations shall have adequate supervision when using Civic Center facilities at a ratio of not less than one adult per twenty minors. Disregard of this rule shall be considered cause for immediate cancellation of.the Use Permit. 6. Any approved Application for Use of Facilities may be revoked without previous notice where conflicting dates with a City purpose have subsequently developed. For other cause(s), permits may be revoked at any time upon 24 hours notice. * Governmental Agencies -are exempt from this requirement. 1� V06 7. No animals., except those necessary for disability assistance, are permitted in the Civic Center. 8. No admission fees may be charged, unless as a fund- raiser for the organization renting the facility. 9. These guidelines may be modified at the discretion of the City - Council . w w w w w w-- w w- w w-- w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w FY 1993/94 hourly rate for use of the facilities is $32 ATTACHMENT 2 Orgouization pars on (s) In Charge; "P�S' 3t (may Phone ;Q16Z- � �II1,.r,1O.IFT,1 L 9 Address :uy�,^r Llnjn�t �l S� _�'� . II,1"� Facility Raquel ted : CA (.- Citun akm'-s urge of IveAt: public ")(I Private DI�scri,ptioa of Activity: � it to, - "�d Date (9) of Use; � � j„j / eri size of orcup : _ (a -a 't-- Tim of Use: Start Finish _II? 3 Total Nours Of U8 a x$ 2 0_Q/brag a � Certificate of Addttioual Inaured Attached: war - City Izsurance Requested; Fee Paid: N A Ref=dable Cleamiag Deposit Paid: A/A Seaaion atom _ $200 Council. Chambers (mv to 53 people) _ $300 Council CUmbern (54 people pl.ua) _ $500 Total Paid: The undermiened hereby agrees to abide by the rules and regulations of the City of L4 Quiuta ralatiug a the uaa of public facilities Data: signature; Title; 210:1 YAjd S I 111 1 Deposit Required For; , ► Dapoza.t Raturned: Pate: XOTIR 7 TLw aarmom 64w"ay the &Ppiicae.,04 0-4 SAO •G6FP#war P! Latorl"Lloa tumor AP an gttlaar or C49 4pcD"a43a; 2t ch4 p4rmalm ,;m mr. as of l4-c*r 09 r-IA* 4r!J44,VmII"oA tar walaa appZ1CAr.1vA l• Dligsi h./ah• Mint yr4I4GF ,r4xr-ft 1 a"tborxz&ciop gram the group eo aaVn. Persona) in charge: 11 rrY�ri NIP Address; y Ds i S ------ --i V CA- ?I Facility Requeste4:�0 9441. type of $vent- Public -,,< ,. Private Description of Activity: 111"- � Y. rM11RYM Y I I 111 I I I pate(s) of 179a : Size of Group; [bob Time of Use: Start ��D •�,) Finish Total foul's of Ua e x Certificate of additional Tuoured A,ttaChed: -or_ City jasarmAce Requested: Fee Paid: LN_�.�„_ Refundable Cleamimg Deposit Paid: _. Session Rom = $200 CauaciI cbsazbera (up to 53 People) = $300 council Comers (54 people plus) _ $SOO I Total Paid: NZA The uudersigned hereby agrees to abide by the ruses and regulations of the City of La Qainta relating to the use of public f4cilitina . Date; Title; Depo$ i t Required For; • j�,,,,,,_ Deposit Returned: Date: KUM- Tow vr.oa .s,Vpaay ehw 4rj12-sa•n4o0 IRP4 Q& ETAL 41) at ll3iaxm ZIGU must Ds AR 4!lsasr of Gp• ■pea.•r4w4w vrpaa:F.osa�. _; UAW parsotk;6 AAt sw 4t?.�Gss of [n. arywasastsop for "*C0 •ppbLq.ploa �.. m.q•, Woos =Umc pr.M*ea¢ wristap #uGLoYsc�G7.raA =�a� CAS �t4w� FYs •�Qp, 1.� i� COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: April 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Approval of a Request by the Riverside County Health Services Agency Regional Access Project to Utilize the Council Chambers for a Free La Quinta Immunization Clinic on June 12, July 9, and August 14, 2002 from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and TB rechecks in the Study Session Room on June 14, July 12, and August 16, 2002 from 10:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: rR Approve the request of the Riverside County Health Services Agency Regional Access Project to utilize the Council Chambers for a free La Quinta Immunization Clinic on June 12, July 9 and August 14, 2002 from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and TB rechecks in the Study Session Room on June 14, July 12 and August 16, 2002 from 10:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. In accordance with the Guidelines for Use of Civic Center Facility, facility fees are not applicable because the clinic and recheck will take place during working hours. None. The Riverside County Health Services Agency Regional Access Project has requested that the Council Chambers be made available on June 12, July 9 and August 14, 2002 from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. for a free La Quinta Immunization Clinic, and TB rechecks on June 14, July 12 and August 16, 2002 in the Study Session Room from 10:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. The request meets all the requirements of the facility use as contained in the City's Guidelines (Attachment 1). The letter of request submitted to the City is attached (Attachment 2). 11-4 Alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the request of the Riverside County Health Services Agency Regional Access Project to utilize the Council Chambers for a free La Quinta Immunization Clinic on June 12, July 9 and August 14, 2002 from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and TB rechecks in the Study Session Room on June 14, July 12 and August 16, 2002 from 10:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m.; or 2. Do not approve the request of the Regional Access Project; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, 77.7,�oii Tom Hartung Director of Building & Safety Approved for submission by: i Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. City Guidelines 2. Letter of Request 0 `r ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF LA QQINTA GO ZLINES FOR USE OF C M C CENTER FACILITY 1. Council Chamber - seats 106. 2. Study Session Room - seats 33. 3. Groups are to use the Study Session Room unless. the' size' of the- group - or the need for audio-visual equipment necessitates use of the Council Chamber. II. CITY USE OF C=C CENTER III 1. The primary use of the Council Chamber and Study Session Room is for the conduct of meetings for the entities listed below: a) City Council b) Planning Commission c) Community Services Commission d) Design Review Board e) Art in Public Places f) Investment Task Force g) Other City appointed boards, commissions and committees 1. Other non-profit and Governmental Agencies, 501(c) entities, that serve residents of La Quinta, may be granted permission by the City Council to use the facilities. 1. A person or group desiring to use Civic Center facilities must file an Application for Use Permit with the City Manager's Office. Applications must be completed and submitted -at least three calendar weeks prior to the scheduled event, unless otherwise waived by the City Council. 1�. J .14 2. All qualified groups using the Council Chamber and Study Session Room must have $500,000 general liability insurance coverage per occurrence, listing the City o T r,,;i nta as a n adAi t i nnal named insured. Groups that do not have insurance may purchase special event insurance through the City's insurance policy. 3. All applicants must indemnify and hold the City harmless from any and all losses and/or claims. Indemnification -forms will be provided by the City and must accompany submittal of the Use Permit Application., 4. Users of the Council Chamber and Study Session Room will be responsible for all damage to the building, appurtenances thereto, and shall be responsible_ for reimbursement to the City for any loss or damage to City property caused by such use. 5 . The City must be notified as soon as possible of any cancellations, so that the facility may be reassigned. 6. Approval shall be granted by the City Council. The City Manager is authorized to permit a use when the Council meeting schedule precludes Council' consideration in a timely manner. Approved permits will be issued to the person filing the application prior to the event. 7. In the interest of widest community use of the Civic Center facilities, no one non-profit community group shall use the facility more than eight ( 8 ) hours per month.* '• • 0 1. The City shall charge for after hours use of Civic Center facilities. Said charge is to recover full cost for use of the facility (personnel, equipment, electricity, etc.) and shall be paid prior to the use. The hourly rate shall be established by the Council during the City's Annual Budget Review process. * Governmental Agencies are exempt from this requirement. 005 2. A refundable cleaning deposit is required. The City may withhold all, or a portion, of the deposit if cleanup is required. The deposit will be established based on the use as follows:* (a) Session Room = $200 (b) Council Chambers (up to-53 people) _ $300 (c) Council Chambers (54 people plus) _ $500 VI. a=c CMMM MOUTM _ 1. City,owned,audio visual and public address equipment maybe used, provided City staff is responsible for its operation. }� �y0 40 400 0 1. Any proposed use of the Council Chamber or Study Session Room rgllarly scheduled shall not lead to the meeting. cancellation of a 2. For non -City functions, use of the Chamber and Study Session Room shall not be prior to 8 a.m. or extend beyond 10 p.m. 3. Food, water, and beverages shall not be consumed in the Civic Center facilities. 4. Smoking shall not be permitted anywhere in the Civic Center. 5. Juvenile organizations shall have adequate supervision when using Civic Center facilities at a ratio of not less than one adult per twenty minors. Disregard of this rule shall be considered cause for immediate cancellation of -the Use Permit. 6. Any approved Application for Use of Facilities may be revoked without previous notice where conflicting dates with a City purpose have subsequently developed. For other cause(s), permits may be revoked at any time upon 24 hours notice. * Governmental Agencies -are exempt from this requirement. 1 � 7. No animals, except those necessary for disability assistance, are permitted in the Civic Center. 8. No admission fees may be charged, unless as a fund- raiser for the organization renting -the facility. 9. These guidelines may be modified at the discretion of the City.Council. ------------------------------- ---------------- ------- FY 1993/94 hourly rate for use of the facilities is $32 ATTACHMENT 2 A&UM f-O-v tax 13C5 .ea 'Tir rrta, 'ea 92253 (76C) 347-1412 April 39 2002 Mayor John Pefia & City Council Members City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 922.53 RE; Request For Use Of Council Chambers Honorable Mayor & City Council Members: I am the La Quints. Cominunnxty Team Leader for the Riverside Counter Health Departments monthly Free Immunization Clinic. As the Community Team Leader, it is my responsibility to secure a location and recruit volunteers for that clinic. In. La Quints,, Riverside County Health Department offers the Free Immunization Clinic the second Wednesday of each month, from. 10AM - 12FM at the Boys & Girls Club of Coachella Valley, La Quinta Unit. During the summer months, the Boys & Girls Club is open during those hours and we must find an alternative location to hold the Clinic. For the past three years, we have used the City Council Chambers for that Clinic, during the summer months. This letter is to request that you allow Riverside County Health Department to use the City Council Chambers on: June 12, July 9t1h and August 14, 2002, from 1OAM to 12 boon, to hold their Free Immuunion Clbuic. The Health Dept. also would need to set up in the Study Session Room to check TB skin tests the following Fridays (6/14, 7/12; & 8116) from 10AM. 10:3OAMO Your consideration of this request would be appreciated. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to give me. a call at (760) 347-1412. - -- - _ ..�nuxxity Team Leader cc: Vanessa Williams -Stewart (Mverside County Health Dept") 11 i `l' f 44 of�ti AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: April 16, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: Approval to Award a Contract to Construct STUDY SESSION: the Avenue 52 Safety Improvements, Project No. 1999- 04A PUBLIC HEARING: Appropriate an additional $24,726 from Infrastructure Funds (225-000-300-290) toward Project No. 1999-04A; and award a contract in the amount of $76,580.00 to Covered JC to construct Project No. 1999-04A, Avenue 52 Safety Improvements, from Jefferson Street to Cetrino. The following represents the available funding and funding sources: FUNDING SOURCE Surface Transportation Program Funds Infrastructure Funds TOTAL: Prior Expenditures: Amount Available: ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT 401-000-466-486 $67,000 401-000-493-000 $15,243 $82,243 ($11,991) $70,252 Considering construction award in the amount of $76,580.00, the following represents the probable project construction budget: Construction (401-692-609-553): $76,580 Inspection/Testing (401-692-609-000): $5,935 Administration (401-692-901-000): $3,829 Contingency (401-692-663-000): $8,634 TOTAL: $94,978 113 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020416c.wpd A shortfall in the amount of $24,726 exists between the amount available and the estimated probable construction budget. Adequate funding is available within the City's Infrastructure Account No. 225-000-300-290 to make up the shortfall. This project is partially funded with Federal funding, therefore the project was bid utilizing prevailing wages. Therefore, there are no Charter City implications. The proposed safety improvements on Avenue 52, from Jefferson Street west to Cetrino, include widening the existing shoulder on the south side of the street by six (6) feet and modification to the signing and striping on the south side of the street. In June 1998, the project was submitted to Caltrans for funding in the Fiscal Year 2000/2001 Hazard Elimination Safety (HES) Program. The project was approved to receive HES funding on July 15, 1999. The project was approved by the City Council as part *of the Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). On July 17, 2001, Caltrans approved the City of La Quinta's obligation submittal package for the proposed safety improvements and authorized the City to proceed with design. On Friday, March 29, 2002, sealed bids were received and publically opened for the construction of this project. The following table illustrates the results of the bids received (a detailed bid comparison summary is provided as Attachment 1). Engineer's Estimate $68,250.00 Covered JC $76,580.00 Pacific Hydrotech $78,294.71 Contreras Construction $89,335.00 Holland -Lowe $89,826.00 CDE Resources $109,665.00 As illustrated, Covered JC submitted the lowest responsive bid for the Avenue 52 Safety Improvements. iti 002 T:\PWDEPT\COU NO L\2002\020416c. wpd Considering the City Council awards the project for construction on April 16, 2002, the following represents a proposed project schedule: Project Award Sign Contracts Mobilize Construction Period (30 Days) Project Acceptance April 16, 2002 April 17, 2002 - April 30, 2002 May 1, 2002 - May 30, 2002 June 2002 The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Appropriate an additional $24,726 from Infrastructure Funds (225-000-300-290) toward Project No. 1999-04A; and award a contract in the amount of $76,580.00 to Covered JC to construct Project No. 1999-04A, Avenue 52 Safety Improvements, from Jefferson Street to Cetrino; or 2. Do not appropriate an additional $24,726 from Infrastructure Funds (225-000- 300-290) toward Project No. 1999-04A; and do not award a contract in the amount of $76,580.00 to Covered JC to construct Project No. 1999-04A, Avenue 52 Safety Improvements, from Jefferson Street to Cetrino; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully sub ed., oy . Stephenson, P.E. Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: `Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Bid Comparison Summary 003 T:\PW DEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020416c. wpd ATTACHMENT 1 i r� cc O V1 O A 000- oo"-q .., kn O O N O O t— ice+ N O kr; N In O rt p \G C*s ON \O w O as O � 00��00� x I, �n 0 \O N O O �c O r-+ N �c to O &0 v O O 00 � 0 O A -4 O O O O O O o �.,0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E-�500000000 O G� .--i O to O tn � •-+ r-+ M M M � \p U � ti o 0 0 0 0 0 � 0000000� 0 H 0000~0C>00 .w A O O O O o 0 0 �0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F O O In O O O Vi O O O N O O O N cc oOvnOoo �r 000 0 0 O 000�* O O 0 O O O O W A O � � O 00 N �c'ncwcncncoo �Uaauo o 00 4-1 c r,U• `n o 0 " U - U�DUv�H V O «3 O �z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O N 0 0 0 0 0 Vi ON O O O \o H 00 N \O 00 M 00 \p D O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O W In 0 A O 00 N \p 00 M 00 O U "1, 00 M " M A ; o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ooviovi\oo\o \o Q1 00 \p N \ \p O1 O� - 00 N �t M N N M O\ ►� N N 00 0 b o00000o00 ad +, o In �D Vn 00 \D o H c o v \o O, CN .� O N A ,.,0000000 0000000= 0 O In O O O O In O [— \p O O O M 0�0 G O U O O 00 O O O o000CD 000 6 y 0 r- ~ 0 0 0 E* Q oo.-, 0,0000 ~ O A U O � O �H N �Uaav�aaa tc 0 00 cCl " U U d '~ 0 UPUv�H o cd O 0,05 T a 0 4hf 4 QUAM COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: April 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Approval of Amendment No. 3 to the City of La Quinta, City of Indio, County of Riverside, and CVAG Reimbursement Agreement and MOU for Final Design and Construction of Jefferson Street from Highway 1 1 1 to Indio Boulevard AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve a Reimbursement Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding between the City of La Quinta, the City of Indio, the County of Riverside, and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) for the Final Design Engineering Services and Construction of Jefferson Street from Highway 1 1 1 to Indio Boulevard. The estimated cost for the Final Design and Construction of Jefferson Street from Indio Boulevard to Highway 1 1 1 is $16,700,000. The following represents the CVAG proposed project budget, as presented within the Memorandum of Understanding (M0U): Final Engineering Services: $1,300,000 Construction: $13,900,000 Construction Admin/Engineering: $1,500,000 Total: $16,700,000 Under this Agreement, CVAG will advance 100% of the necessary funding to complete the project. Upon completion of construction activities, CVAG will be responsible for 75% of the actual project costs. The remaining 25% will be proportionately assigned to the City of La Quinta, City of Indio, and County of Riverside. The City of Indio and the County of Riverside agree to pay the balance of all project costs for their portion of the project. The City of La Quinta shall receive a credit in the amount of $2,610,184 against it's 25 % project share. This credit reflects repayment in the amount of $1,647,184 in accordance with the CVAG-La Quinta future Reimbursement Agreement for the "Washington Street from 500' south of La Quinta evacuation channel to Avenue 50, including widening of the Bridge over the La Quinta Evacuation Channel" and $963,000 from City of La Quinta obtained STIP funding. `00'tiwo T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020416b.wpd The City of La Quinta's 25% share is currently estimated by CVAG to be $2,797,250. Considering CVAG 's estimated cost share for the City of La Quinta exceeds the credit amount by $186,466, the City of La Quinta agrees to pay the balance of their proportionate share if the project's actual costs exceed the $2,610,184 credit. In November of 1988, the voting public of Riverside County approved Measure "A" as a financing measure for Highway projects. One of the projects identified to receive Measure "A" funding was the ultimate improvements of Jefferson Street from Avenue 54 to Indio Boulevard. The City of La Quinta served as the project "Lead Agency" for the Phase I Jefferson Street Improvements from Highway 1 1 1 south to Avenue 54. Amendment No. 3 (Attachment 1) to the City of La Quinta-City of Indio -County of Riverside-CVAG Reimbursement Agreement and MOU provides for the funding and reimbursement of expenditures for the Phase II Jefferson Street Improvements from Highway 1 1 1 north to Indio Boulevard. Amendment No. 3 provides for the following: • Change in the lead agency for this phase of the project from the City of La Quinta to the County of Riverside; • Authorizes funding reimbursement for final design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction for the Phase II Jefferson Street Improvements from Highway 1 1 1 north to Indio Boulevard; • Recognizes the estimated costs identified within the funding exhibit are estimates only, and that the actual costs will be assigned based upon the 75 %/25 % repayment formula presented; • CVAG agrees to pay 75 % of the allowable costs for the City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside; • The City of Indio and the County of Riverside agree to pay their 25% proportionate share of the project; • The City of La Quinta shall receive credit in the amount of $2,610,184 against its 25% project share; • The City of La Quinta agrees to pay the balance of their proportionate share minus the $2,610,184 credit; and • The City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside agree to take all actions necessary to acquire the right-of-way needed for the project within their respective jurisdictions. `) 1 6,W J TAPWDEPT\C0UNCIL\2002\020416b.wpd 002, Alternatives for the City Council to consider: 1. Approve a Reimbursement Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding between the City of La Quinta, the City of Indio, the County of Riverside, and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments for the Final Design Engineering Services and Construction of Jefferson Street from Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard; or 2. Do not approve the Reimbursement Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding between the City of La Quinta, the City of Indio, the County of Riverside, and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments for the Final Design Engineering Services and Construction of Jefferson Street from Highway. 1 1 1 to Indio Boulevard; or 3. Provide staff with additional direction. Respectfully_ submitted, Roy . Step#ienson, P.E. Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Amendment No. 3 1-1 - . 003 T:\PWDEPT\CO UNCI L\2002\020416b. wpd . 1 .1VC • � � Co. Transportation AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE CITY OF LA QUINTA - CITY OF INDIO - COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CVAG REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT AND MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) PROJECT FINAL DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION "JEFFERSON STREET FROM HIGHWAY 111 TO INDIO BOULEVARD" THIS AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE is made and entered into this day of tvka f - , 2002, by and between the County of Riverside ("Lead Agency"), the City of La Quinta ("Agency"), the City of Indio ("Agency"), and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments, a California joint powers agency, ("CVAG"). This amendment provides for the funding and reimbursement of expenditures in addition to those previously authorized under the terms of the existing Reimbursement Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding, executed April 29, 1997 ("MOU"). All other provisions in the MOU and Amendments Number One and Two thereto shall remain in force. Under the terms of the MOU, $600,000 was authorized for Preliminary Engineering of "Jefferson Street, from Avenue 54 to Indio Boulevard". This amendment changes the lead agency for this phase of the project to the County of Riverside instead of the City of La Quinta and amends the prior authorization for funding and reimbursement to include .the final engineering, right-of-way acquisition and construction project cost for "Jefferson Street, from Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard", which is currently estimated to cost $16,700,000 ($1,300,000 for Final Design Engineering Services and $15,400,000 for Construction). The revised Scope of Services, estimate of Cost, and updated Project Schedule are attached hereto as Exhibits "A", "B", and "C", which are incorporated herein by this reference. Exhibit "D" - "Project Sign", provides a guide for Project Sign format. The parties recognize that the estimated costs outlined on Exhibit "A" are estimates only, and that the actual costs may exceed those costs. The parties agree that the reimbursement formula outlined below applies to the total allowable project costs for the final engineering, right-of-way acquisition and construction project cost for "Jefferson Street, from Highway 111 to Indio Boulevard. CVAG agrees to pay up to 75% of allowable project costs for the La Quinta, Indio, County of Riverside portions of the project. La Quinta, Indio, County of Riverside agree to pay the balance of all project costs for their portions of the project as costs are incurred. CVAG agrees to process the requests for payment or reimbursement of La Quinta, Indio and the County of Riverside within seven (7) days of receipt. CVAG agrees to make all required payments of allowable project costs within (7) days of receiving the requests. 4J �/ 00 5 Amendment #3 CVAG-La Quinta-Indio-County of Riverside/Jefferson Street/September, 2001 Page 1 It is the responsibility of La Quinta, Indio and County of Riverside to take all actions necessary to acquire the right-of-way needed for the project within their respective jurisdictions. Nothing herein constitutes a commitment by any party hereto to exercise or utilize any powers of eminent domain for any acquisition of any property or property interest necessary or appropriate for implementation of the construction project, or for any purpose. All parties hereto understand and acknowledge that the exercise of eminent domain is dependant upon a consideration and passage of a resolution of necessity, which constitutes a legislative determination by the governing body of the condemning agency, and such determination cannot be made prior to the conduct of a noticed hearing at which affected property owners have an opportunity to appear and be heard regarding the findings required to initiate eminent domain proceeding. All such findings lie within the legislative discretion of the governing body of the agency considering condemnation. Neither agency hereto has by any representation or agreement herein, nor by any action undertaken pursuant hereto regarding preliminary project planning, investigation of potential right-of-way acquisition, appraisal, or extension of offers to purchase any property or property interest, acquisition of such interests committed herein to proceed with eminent domain proceedings regarding any particular property, or at all. In the event acquisition of all property interests necessary or appropriate for construction of the project as currently contemplated is impossible or otherwise does not go forward, the parties agree to cooperate reasonably in any redesign, modification, or termination of the project, as the parties may at that time deem appropriate. The parties agree that all costs associated with the acquisition of right-of-way related to the final approved project design, including, but not limited to, filing fees, service of process, attorneys' fees, deposits of just compensation, appraisal fees, expert witness fees, escrow costs, costs of clearing title, deposition costs, exhibit costs, jury fees, litigation costs, and funds for settlements and just compensation awards and judgements shall be allowable project costs subject to payment or reimbursement as set forth above. The other allowable project costs are as outlined in Attachment 1 to the MOU, CVAG's Regional Arterial Program, Project Cost Determination and Expense Eligibility. The City of La Quinta agrees to defend and indemnify County of Riverside, City of Indio and CVAG for any claim or action arising out of or relating to the City of La Quinta's failure to timely acquire the necessary right-of-way for the project. The City of Indio agrees to defend and indemnify City of La Quinta, County of Riverside and CVAG for any claim or action arising out of or relating to the City of Indio's failure to timely acquire the necessary right-of-way for the project. The County of Riverside agrees to defend and indemnify City of La Quinta, City of Indio and CVAG for any claim or action arising out of or relating to the County of Riverside's failure to timely acquire the necessary right-of-way for the project. CVAG agrees to defend and indemnify City of La Quinta, County of Riverside and City of Indio for any claim or action arising out of or relating to CVAG's failure to timely provide the funding of any allowable project cost as set forth in this amendment. 1 ,.) 7! Amendment #3 CVAG-La Quinta-Indio-County of Riverside/Jefferson Street/September, 2001 Page 2 �a 0 Inasmuch as this phase of the project is not located in the unincorporated portion of the County, the County has no financial obligation with regard to the additional work authorized in this amendment. The parties hereto have caused this Amendment number three to be executed by their duly authorized representatives on this date: ATTEST: By:�--44k Cie of the Board of APPROVED TO FORM: By: mjh_��' County Counsel ATTEST: By: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By: do -16 W994 BOE3 BUSTER Supervisors Chairman of the Board of Supervisors CITY OF LA QUINTA M Mayor i Amendment #3 CVAG-La Quinta-Indio-County of Riverside/Jefferson Street/September, 2001 Page 3 i 1 6') " 00 ATTEST: 0 City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney ATTEST: CITY OF INDIO By: Mayor CVj By: By: Patricia A. Larson, Executive Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: Bye Toni Eggebraaten, General Counsel I Amendment #3 CVAG-La Quints -Indio -County of Riverside/Jefferson Street/September, 2001 Page 4 08 EXHIBIT "A" - AMENDMENT THREE SCOPE OF SERVICES PROJECT FINAL DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION "JEFFERSON STREET FROM HIGHWAY 111 TO INDIO BOULEVARD" FINAL ENGINEERING SERVICES - PHASE II The County of Riverside shall serve as `Lead Agency' for the Final Engineering Services. Based on the Preliminary Engineering Report, prepare roadway plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) for Jefferson Street from Highway 111. Professional Engineering services include all necessary survey, legal description, and associated right-of-way maps and plats to undertake right-of- way acquisition. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION Subject to the limitations set forth in the Second Amendment to the MOU, the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside and the City of Indio shall each be the "Lead Agency" as to the acquisition of the necessary right-of-way within their respective jurisdictions. CONSTRUCTION - PHASE II The County of Riverside shall continue to serve as `Lead Agency' and shall cause the construction of Jefferson Street from Highway I I I to Indio Boulevard. Amendment #3 CVAG-La Quinta-Indio-County of Riverside/Jefferson Street/September, 2001 Page 5 1 C' EXHIBIT B - AMENDMENT THREE ESTIMATE OF COST PROJECT FINAL DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION "JEFFERSON STREET FROM HIGHWAY 111 TO INDIO BOULEVARD" Design Engineering and Construction estimates, for the Jefferson Street from Indio Boulevard to Hwy. 111, are provided by the City of La Quinta as follows: ITEM Final Engineering Services: Design Engineering Services Construction: City of La Quinta City of Indio County of Riverside Whitewater River Bridge Construction Subtotal Administration & Construction Engineering Construction Subtotal TOTAL CVAG share = 75% of eligible total cost BUDGET ($) 153005000 $4,882,000 $4,0725000 $ 4469000 4 500 000 $13,9005000 $ 10500,000 15 400 000 $1697009000 Any excess property purchased to secure the necessary Right -of -Way will be deemed to belong to the Regional Arterial Program. Excess property will be disposed of in the best interests of the Regional Arterial Program, in order to recapture funds expended. Amendment #3 CVAG-La Quinta-Indio-County of Riverside/Jefferson Street/September, 2001 Page 6 01 JURISDICTIONAL REIMBURSEMENT SCHEDULE - AMENDMENT THREE PROJECT FINAL DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION "JEFFERSON STREET FROM HIGHWAY 111 TO INDIO BOULEVARD" (AGENCIES SHALL HAVE A FUNDING POLICY ACCEPTABLE TO CVAG IN PLACE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION) Below is the estimated reimbursement amounts for the following Phases: — Preliminary Design Cost (Original Agreement): $600,000 — Final Design Engineering and Construction Cost: $15,061,660 (This Amendment number 2) — Final Design Engineering and Construction Cost: $16,700,000 (This Amendment number 3) JURISDICTION ESTIMATED REIMBURSEMENT City of La Quinta (67%) City of Indio (30%) AMOUNT for Phase II (25% Project Cosl)_ Final Design/Construction $2,7975250 $ 152525500 * * County of Riverside (3%) $ 125,250 Total Agencies Share $ 491759000 This estimated reimbursement amount is for the Final Design and Construction of Jefferson street from Avenue Hwy I I I to Indio Boulevard. * * CVAG agrees to pay up to 75% of allowable project costs for the City of La Quinta, City of Indio, County of Riverside portions of the project. The City of Indio and the County of Riverside agree to pay the balance of all project costs for their portion of the project. The City of La Quinta shall receive credit in the amount of $2,610,184 against it's 25% project share. This credit reflects repayment in the amount of $1,647,184 in accordance with the CVAG-La Quinta future Reimbursement Agreement for the "Washington Street from 500' south of La Quinta evacuation channel to Avenue 50 including widening Bridge over La Quinta evacuation channel" and $963,000 from City of La Quinta obtained STIP funding. The City of La Quints agree to pay the balance of their portion of the project minus the $25610,184 credit. Amendment #3 CVAG-La Quinta-Indio-County of Riverside/Jefferson Street/September, 2001 Page 7 oii EXHIBIT "C" - AMENDMENT THREE UPDATED PROJECT SCHEDULE PROJECT FINAL DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION "JEFFERSON STREET FROM HIGHWAY 111 TO INDIO BOULEVARD" (FROM INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) Final Plans, Specifications and Estimates Bid Period Contract Award Notice to Proceed Project Completion Amendment #3 CVAG-La Quinta-Indio-County of Riverside/Jefferson Street/September, 2001 Page 9 ` F EXHIBIT "D" "PROJECT SIGN" PROJECT FINAL DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION "JEFFERSON STREET FROM HIGHWAY 111 TO INDIO BOULEVARD" The Pro'ei ct Sign shall consist of the following information: MEASURE"All PROJECT YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK "PROJECT NAME" 1118013:111:�•� — RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION/ COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS — LEAD AGENCY/AGENCY Other information, such as the City Logos and/or Measure "A" Funds Logo, is encouraged. f: \home\aazzu\agree\stip\amend\j effamnd3 901 7 Amendment #3 CVAG-La Quinta-Indio-County of Riverside/Jefferson Street/September, 2001 Page 10 ,� COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: ITEM TITLE: April 16, 2002 Authorization for Overnight Travel for the Accounting Manager to Attend the 2002 Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Annual Conference in Denver, Colorado, June 16-19, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Accounting Manager to attend the four -day 2002 Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Annual Conference in Denver, Colorado, June 16 - 19, 2002. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Costs associated with attending the Conference will be funded through Fiscal Services Training & Meetings, Account No. 101-151-637-000. This conference was budgeted in the 2001 /2002 Fiscal Year Budget at $2000. The breakdown of expenditures anticipated for this conference is as follows: ► Conference Enrollment - Early Registration $ 310.00 ► Transportation/Overnight Lodging/Meals 1,690.00 Total $ 2,000.00 CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The four -day 2002 Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Annual Conference focuses on financial issues affecting local governments. Seminar information is included in Attachment 1. 13 A FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Accounting Manager to attend the four -day 2002 Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Annual Conference; or 2. Do not approve authorization for overnight travel for the Accounting Manager to attend the four -day 2002 Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Annual Conference; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfjglly submitted, nance Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 2002 Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Annual Conference Agenda 0 k) I . b^0,,:— t Y i�a�• A� ,fie .,,� T'� 1 y, • .,._...®.-....,.. ,..,....-_,,, .• .. ,.;::::. a .« Register on in A, ANN 16 ' .yq , R'.�i.' ere rr ,.1 A w •"oil * " Accounting,,Auditing, and Financial Reporting (Cont�d.) If I Only Knew Then What 1 Know Now: Practical lessons from Early Implementers (Monday, June 17,330 p.m. - 5 p.m.) Early implementers of the new governmental financial report- ing model have acquired invaluable experience on how best to meet the challenge of implementation. This session will be devoted to identifying the lessons to be drawn from their expe- rience for the benefit of governments now preparing to embark upon this process. We're Here to Help! The New Audit Guide (Tuesday, June 18, 10:15 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.) Auditors of state and local governments have eagerly awaited the release of the latest edition of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' Audits of State and Local Governmental Units. This newest version of the audit guide is specifically designed for use with the new governmental finan- cial reporting model. This session will examine key elements of the guidance offered in the new publication. The Never -Ending Story: The latest Reporting Model Guidance (Tuesday, June 18, 10:15 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.) The GASB recently issued an "omnibus pronouncement that provides critical clarifications of and amendments to GASB Statement No. 34. The GASB also recently issued a second implementation guide to help financial statement preparers address various implementation issues. This session will review the key guidance contained in both of these new GASB docu- ments. Critical Condition: Applying the Modified Approach to Infrastructure Reporting (Tuesday, June 18, 1:45 p.m. - 3:15 p.m.) This session will examine the requirements and explore the implementation issues involved with taking the modified approach to infrastructure reporting. The session also will eval- uate the pros and cons of selecting this nontraditional approach. Pay Now or Pay Later: Costing Government Services (Tuesday, June 18, 1:45 p.m. - 3:15 p.m.) Few questions are asked as frequently in the public sector as "how much will it cost?" Yet the concept of "cost" has a variety of meanings and applications. This session will explore the process of assigning a cost to government services and the use of cost data for decision making. Then and Now: Note Disclosure and the New Model (Wednesday, June 19, 8:30 a.m. - 10 a.m.) The new governmental financial reporting model has brought in its wake a number of new note disclosure requirements. Likewise, a recent GASB standard has further expanded required note disclosures. This session will explore both of these developments, with special emphasis on what has changed and what has remained the same. Special Order: Applying the New Reporting Model to Special -Purpose Governments (Wednesday, June 19, 8:30 a.m. - 10 a.m.) Most discussions of the new governmental financial reporting model focus on general-purpose local governments. Such an approach sometimes can raise more questions than it answers for special-purpose governments. This session will examine the new model from the perspective of special-purpose govern- ments such as school districts, stand-alone enterprise funds, colleges and universities, and tribal governments. Let's Settle Up: Accounting and Financial Reporting for Investments (Wednesday, June 19, 10:15 a.m. - noon) GASB standards provide extensive guidance on the proper accounting and financial reporting for investments. This ses- sion will review this guidance and explore how to apply it in a variety of circumstances (including its proper application to alternative investments). All Things Considered: Performance Auditing for local Governments (Wednesday, June 19, 10:15 a.m. - noon) Governments can always benefit from a systematic examina- tion of the effectiveness and efficiency of their various opera- tions. This session will consider the theory and practice of per- formance auditing in the public sector and how it can help government managers meet the challenge of doing more with less. Colorado Convention Center Rnnic+or online at www.pfoa.org U64 Budgeting and Financial Planning This track will offer practical guidance and explore cutting -edge developments in public budgeting. Leading practitioners will discuss traditional areas of emphasis such as priority setting, revenue forecasting, cutback management, and strategic planning, as well as advanced topics in financial modeling, performance management, and technology. Taking the Plunge: Converting to Multi -Year Budgeting (Sunday, June 16, 1:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.) An increasing number of state and local governments are con- verting from an annual budget process to a multi -year budget framework. Speakers with experience in this area will discuss the types of multi -year budgets, the advantages of this alter- native to traditional budgeting, and the political, administra- tive, and procedural challenges of the conversion process. Developing a Winning Formula for Capital Planning (Sunday, June 16, 2:45 p.m. - 3:45 p.m.) Because of limited resources, capital budgeting always pre- sents difficult choices as to which projects to fund and when. Systematically assessing capital assets and establishing a formal process for evaluating and prioritizing projects can help drive sound capital planning practices. This session will highlight innovative approaches to capital budgeting and planning, drawing on the experiences of governments of all sizes. Launching a Regional Benchmarking Project (Monday, June 17, 10:30 a.m. - 12:15 p.m.) You understand the process of benchmarking for comparison of performance measures, but don't know quite how to put that knowledge into action. Perhaps you and your neighboring governments are eager to begin a benchmarking project, but the collaboration and effort necessary to compare services seem daunting. This session will offer step-by-step advice on how to get a regional benchmarking project off the ground. Outcome -Based Budgeting: Linking Resource Allocation to Performance (Monday, June 17, 1:30 p.m. - 3:15 p.m.) Traditional budgeting models measure success in terms of dol- lars spent rather than services provided. This approach tends to take previous policies and programs for granted and to dis- courage the review of service outcomes. In this session, speak- ers will present strategies for altering budgetary norms and political mindsets in order to link agency performance to pub- lic spending. Charting Your Course: Implementing Long -Term Financial Planning (Monday, June 17, 3:30 p.m. - 5 p.m.) Financial planning enhances the ability of governments to anticipate opportunities and threats to their long-term finan- cial stability. The need for long-term financial planning is even more pronounced now that disaster preparedness has become a top priority for policymakers and citizens. This nuts -and -bolts session will review the development and implementation of a long-term financial plan, including the considerations of small - er jurisdictions. It also will provide guidance on how to connect the long-term financial plan to the annual operating budget. Technology for Performance Management (Tuesday, June 18, 10:15 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.) The sheer amount of data required to operate an effective per- formance measurement system can be staggering. Without the aid of computer systems to organize measurement -related information, governments may have difficulty implementing performance measurement programs. This session will provide an overview of the use of technology in performance meas- urement systems, including how performance data can be stored and accessed electronically, the costs and benefits of the various technology options, and how to win support from key stakeholders. Balancing Act: Budgeting in an Uncertain Economy (Tuesday, June 18, 1:45 p.m. - 3:15 p.m.) After almost a decade of revenue growth, many governments are ill prepared to face the realities of an uncertain economy. At the same time, governments have been forced to increase spending to enhance security and to prepare for potential dis- asters. This session will provide practical advice on how to maintain budgetary balance without compromising existing programs and services. Speakers also will identify management strategies that promote budgetary balance. GFOA's Distinguished Budget Presentation Awards Program: Applying the Criteria to Your Budget Document (Wednesday, June 19, 8:30 a.m. - 10 a.m.) The Budget Awards Program is a standard of excellence in pub- lic budgeting that promotes exemplary budget documentation by state and local governments. This session will help current and prospective participants of this program apply the awards criteria to their budget documents, with particular emphasis on smaller governments and first-time participants. Award recipients also will discuss the impact of publishing an award - winning budget document and how governments can more effectively communicate budgetary information to the public. Wrench, Hammer, or Saw? Decision Tools for Program Evaluation (Wednesday, June 19, 10:15 a.m. - noon) Unprecedented access to data and the development of nation- al standards have made budgeting less intuitive and more sci- entific in recent years. To be successful in this new era of gov- ernment budgeting, finance officers need to be familiar with analytical decision -making tools. This session will introduce some of these tools and discuss their application in the budget process. , &„ I' r) 0(0 U Register Online at www.gfoa.org h Management and Investing for improving treasury operations. Cash J The cash management and investing track will explore both economictgrowth,ed and not rest rates, and inflation, and will recommend Economistswith Economists and portfolio managers will provide forecast rs ll resent prudent inves tment strategies in today's interest rate environment. Experienced rPane'lists also will Idiscussrlhow tech- state-of-the-art treasury techniques, investment easurtroff sets, and portfolio nology can improve the performance of the Y Economic Forecast: What's in the Cards? (Sunday, June 16, 2:45 p.m. - 3:45 p.m.) The economic cycle and dramatic events at home and abroad have upset the stability of the economy. Leading and lagging indicators only seem to create a fog of data and uncertainty. In this session, economists will rates, and the ir, andanflat onding forecasts over the next of economic growth, interest 12 months. Maximizing Yield in Today's Interest Rate Environment (Monday, June 17, 10:30 a.m. forp.m.) investing are safety, The three fundamental goalspublic liquidity, and yield. The current interest rate environment has made it difficult to meet the third goal of yield. This session will present strategies for e'ndingylbld in the ond interest r rent strate environment, such as securities swaps, and the use of commercial paper. .._.._&';. nip+innal Park Maintaining Liquidity in the Wake of a Disaster (Monday, June 17, 1:30 p.m. - 3:15 p.m.) The tragic events of September 11 disrupted the financial sys- tem, making it difficult for many governments to access their deposit and investment accounts. This session will cover disas- ter preparedness as it relates to cash management, including GFOA guidelines on diversification ofinvestment firms, trade settlement, and emergency back-up procedures. Treasury Management Systems: Procurement and Implementation Methods (Monday, June 17, 3:30 p.m. - 5 p.m.) The decision between an integrated ERP system and a special- ized, "best-of-breed��treasury system involves important trade-offs. This session will helps Inance officers lect the best treasurysman- tand these trade-offs so that they can agement system for their particular needs. New Cash Management Tools for Smaller Governments (Tuesday, June 18, 10:15 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.) Financial institutions are continually expanding their portfo- lios of products and services to take advantage of the effi- ciencies offered by new technologies. This session will provide an overview of the latest in banking services, the implications of these new services for smaller governments, w cash managemenes t for evaluating and implementing tools. Safeguarding Financial Assets: Collateral Management and Depository Evaluation (Tuesday, June 18, 1:45 p.m. - 3:15 p.m.) This session focuses on the implementation of the GFOA rec- ommended practice on managing collateral. Speakers will address issues of custodial and sub -custodial safekeeping of securities, appropriate collateral securities, and legal issues arising from the Uniform Commercial Code. Proven tech- niques for evaluating the creditworthiness of financial institu- tions also will be discussed. Rethinking Internal Controls in Electronic Banking (Wednesday, June 19, 8:30 a.m. - 10 a.m.) The increasing use of the Internet as a platform for treasury management activities raises a whole new breed of security issues. In this session, speakers will ythese issu protecting��►If recommend a new controlframework for assets in the information age. u 66 Debt Management The use of municipal debt to finance infrastructure and other capital assets continues to be a challenging area of public finance. This track features experts from the public and private sectors who will speak on a broad range of topics related to debt man- agement. This year's sessions will move beyond the basics to explore strategies for reducing borrowing costs, institutionalizing discipline in debt issuance, employing technology, and maintaining regulatory compliance. This track also will examine the effec- tiveness of capital financing techniques outside the municipal debt market. Making Good Disclosure (Sunday, June 16, 1:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.) Rating agencies and investors expect to review fairly standard information in evaluating the credit quality of an issue. This session will explore how additional disclosure can make an issue more attractive, what information can remain undis- closed while maintaining "full disclosure," differences between the primary and secondary markets, and new issues regarding Web -based disclosure. Speakers also will discuss how to incorporate an issuer relations program into a govern- ment's overall disclosure strategy. Regulatory Update for Debt Issuers (Sunday, June 16, 2:45 p.m. - 3:45 p.m.) Representatives from the IRS, SEC, and MSRB will discuss in lay terms current and future regulations affecting the tax-exempt debt market. Topics will include disclosure, Web site mainte- nance, arbitrage, and secondary market trading. Experts also will discuss IRS audits of tax-exempt debt issues and what issuers should do if they are subjected to such an audit. Trends in Economic Development Finance (Monday, June 17, 10:30 a.m. - 12:15 p.m.) Governments often turn to economic development projects to bolster revenues. This session will explore appropriate levels of public participation in development deals, tools for evalu- ating return on investment, and current trends in economic development finance. How Low Will They Go? Making the Most of the Current Interest Rate Environment (Monday, June 17, 1:30 p.m. - 3:15 p.m.) Interest rates have reached historically low levels, creating a unique opportunity for governments to achieve savings by refunding and/or restructuring outstanding debt. This session will examine when it is in a government's best interest to either refund or restructure its debt. It will also explore the mechanics of the secondary market and why finance officers should be interested in it, with particular emphasis on innova- tive instruments like swaps, floaters, inverse floaters, collars, caps, and other derivatives. The Debt Management Implications of GASB Statements No. 34 and No. 38 (Monday, June 17, 3:30 p.m. - 5 p.m.) As smaller jurisdictions begin to make the transition to the requirements of GASB Statements No. 34 and No. 38, their impact on the municipal debt market is growing. Learn how official statements have changed and the best ways to disclose financial information under these new standards. Innovative Capital and Infrastructure Finance (Tuesday, June 18, 10:15 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.) Governments traditionally use general obligation bonds and/or grants to fund their capital needs. Still, many govern- ments have deferred important projects for lack of financing. This session will explore some of the less commonly used instruments to fund capital projects, including non -general obligation bonds, capital pools, and more. Each instrument will be discussed in terms of its strengths, weaknesses, and appropriate uses. Evaluating Credit Enhancement for Public Debt (Tuesday, June 18, 1:45 p.m. -- 3:15 p.m.) Many governments use credit enhancements to strengthen the creditworthiness of their obligations and to lower their borrowing costs. When is credit enhancement appropriate? How much should it cost? What alternatives are available? Learn how to evaluate the need (or lack thereof) for credit enhancement and how to communicate the costs and benefits of enhancement options to elected officials and the public. Leasing as a Financing Option (Wednesday, June 19, 8:30 a.m. - 10 a.m.) Technology and real estate assets have long been leased in the public sector, and today's finance officer now enjoys a breadth of leasing options. This session will explore the various types of leases, the leasing process, and the lease vs. buy vs. borrow decision. Special emphasis will be placed on evaluation tools, sale -leasebacks, and lease -purchase agreements. Denver International Airport Register Online at www.gfoa.org 1 7 Management and Policy d range of backgrounds. Part of the reason for le from a broad g The public finance profession continues to attract talented peop s challenges for finance officers. ' n continues to change to include policy, analytic, and strategicdroles. Organizational culture, inter - this is that the finance function all resent tremen governmental politics, a dynamic workforce, and a turbulent economy p This track will examine a broad range of issues related to the expanding role of finance officers and the professionals with whom they work. Smart Growth: Revitalization Incentives That Promote Development (Sunday, June 16, 1:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.) The public is becoming increasingly s,�many electede to the tofff urban sprawl on quality of life. As a result cials are now championing smart growth tiand es designed to more responsibly manage economicgrowth anpresentingoptions develop- ment. This session will examine a responsible manner via revitaliza- tion incentives. Enterprise Risk Management (Sunday, June 16, 2:45 p.m. - 3:45 p.m.) Identifying and mitigating risk is an essential element of gov- ernment financial management. This session will provide an overview of the process for developing for addressiive risk ng risks management program, including strategies related to disaster preparedness and cost recovery. Issues in Tax Increment Financing (Monday, June 17, 10:30 a.m. - 12:15 P.M.) Although many local governments have relied on tax incre- ment financing (TIF) programs to spur economic development, the real impact of TIF districts and other 'I conditionment financing tools on local government financial is a common subject of debate. How many districts are too many? What is the impact on school thedistricts and debt ooaldathey n9 be held harmless? How do you 9 district? This session will answer these questions and others. Sustainability: Investing in the latest trends in e-procures nent� d nance theirimpact on state and local government purchasing a Tomorrow Today (Monday, June 17, 1:30 p.m. - 3:15 P.M.) Sustainability is the idea that current economic and consump- tion patterns should not reduce opportunities for future gen- erations by impairing or depleting natural resources. As this finance officers will have an notion gains wider acceptance, finin support of government increasingly important role to play sustainability efforts. This session will further define the issue of sustainability, examine the role of the finance officer there- in, and highlight some of the more cinnovative sustainability country. initiatives in governments across the rY B2G and Beyond: Trends in Financial Policies: Management Tools or Book Ends? (Tuesday, June 18, 10:15 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.) Governments are encouraged to develop financial policies as a way to promote effective management of financial resources. unfortunately, however, many policy manuals end up collect- ing dust. This session will provide an overview of the process of developing and implementing financial policies, and will high- light the use of policies in leading jurisdictions. e-Procurement (Monday, June 17, 3:30 p.m. - 5 p.m.) The efficient and cost-effective procurement of goods and services is a critical success factor for public agencies. In the last few years, many state and local governments have purchased and implemented e-procurement systems with the objective of improving their procurement processes. This session will discuss Diagnosing Your Fiscal Health: Measuring and Reporting Financial Condition (Tuesday, June 18, 1.45 p.m. 3:15 P.M.) The financial health of a government is critical to its ability to meet the needs of various stakeholders. Financial indicator measures are developed to monitor financial condition and the achievement of established financial goals. This session will detail the steps for developing and utilizing a fiscal trend mon- itoring system. Intergovernmental Strategies for Service Delivery (Wednesday, June 19, 8:30 a.m. - 10 a.m.) As local governments face ndedual re . for sery services, thestagnating for more rev- enues and increasing demd creative strategies for service delivery has become paramount. This session will review a variety of practical approaches to regional service delivery, including tax -base sharing, public/pri- vate partnerships, and cultural asset districts. In light of tto increased threat of domestic managemment agional so will be discussed. disaster preparedness Red Rocks Amphitheatre U0 .C-. % rIy } Pensions and Benefits In a single year, the world of pensions and benefits has changed immensely. This track will examine these changes, including investment strategy in a down market, changing tax laws, and the resurgence of health care inflation. A focus on best practices will be incorporated into the concurrent sessions. Mastering the forces of change helps ensure that pension and benefits admin- istrators and finance directors continue to deliver employee benefits efficiently, effectively, and securely. Delivering State -of -the -Art Customer Service (Sunday, June 16, 1:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.) Pensions are in the customer service business as much as any sector of government. This session examines public -sector pensions that have benchmarked customer service and imple- mented technology solutions to improve their ability to pro- vide state-of-the-art service to plan participants. The session will look at case studies of benchmarking and enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation among multi- and single -employer pension plans. Managing Political and Investment Risk in the Post -Bubble Market (Monday, June 17, 10:30 a.m. - 12:15 p.m.) Public -sector pensions have increased their allocations toward domestic and international equities during the last 10 years, a time of unparalleled buoyancy in the stock market. The last two years have seen a partial reversal of these gains, and leg- islators are calling for a reexamination of investment prac- tices. Is a change in asset allocation strategy during a down cycle appropriate or is it a form of market timing that will damage investment returns? How can pension systems stick to their long-term strategy? What confidence -building measures are needed to maintain a long-term focus? Asset -Liability Management 101 (Monday, June 17, 1:30 p.m. - 3:15 p.m.) GFOA's recommended practice on asset allocation calls for defined benefit plans to take into account assets and liabilities when deciding upon a strategic asset allocation. This session will focus on the fundamentals of managing pension invest- ments using an integrated approach that reviews and match- es both the asset and liability side of the pension fund ledger. Speakers from both large and small pensions will provide examples of how they have used asset -liability modeling to improve their asset allocation decisions and understanding of risk. Taming the Beast of Health Care Inflation (Monday, June 17, 3:30 p.m. - 5 p.m.) A recent survey shows that health care inflation —if it ever went away —is definitely back on a double-digit path. How can governments respond to this perennial issue? Where can they marshal their resources most effectively? Speakers will discuss their efforts to discipline this high -cost, high -growth area. Brokerage Windows: A Pandora's Box? (Tuesday, June 18, 10:15 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.) In the defined contribution world, the trend has been to give individuals more investment options and more education to help them make better choices. Brokerage windows represent the ultimate in choice, allowing individual participants to select a virtually unlimited number of securities —not just diversified mutual funds. Does it make sense to offer broker- age windows through a tax -advantaged retirement plan and, if so, how should it be structured? GFOA's new recommended practice on brokerage windows will be discussed and real - world examples provided. Phased Retirement: Defining a New Benefit (Tuesday, June 18, 1:45 p.m. - 3:15 p.m.) Relatively few employers offer workers the option of "phased retirement," which involves giving long-standing employees the option of going to a part-time schedule without sacrific- ing benefits. Can this program be implemented in the public sector in either defined benefit or defined contribution plans? How would it be done? What are the costs and benefits? This session will answer these and other questions about the use of phased retirement in the public sector. Colorado State Capitol 4�9 Register Online at www, foa.org �94 Re o-) J 9 g� Technology and Digital Government nth which have invested billions of dollars Tec gY and local Technology continues to be the largest tool of innovation ears.Enterprise resour a planning (ERP) and financial management hnoystems are such on administrative systems over the past severs y and new technology delivery as the backbone to digital government. Governments throughout h intelligence software,e country are examining emir security, serving rocuremen , as constituent relationship management (CRM), e-pto streamline oper- ervice providers (ASPS). In addition, recent events have ins are using topics such as sec , options such i applications different disaster tanning, and data recovery. This track features theffectively. ways government 9 P ations and improve the information they need to manage Managing Complex Technology Projects (Sunday, June 16, 1:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.) Implementing a financial system is a tremendous undertaking that requires skill in project management, teamwork and coalition building, technological savvy, and sheer endurance. This session will provide tips on how to successfully manage technology projects. Internal Controls for the e-Government Era (Sunday, June 16, 2:45 p.m. - 3:45 p.m.) opportunities for While e-government presents a host of new oP p efficiency and improved servicefort nternaltuents, it controls.also poses a Tradit Traditional number of new challenges paper and manual sys- internal control dogma was based on pose problems for tradi- tional Modern, paperless systems may p internal control assumptions at all levels of govern- ment. At Your Service: Government Call Is Centers and Citizen Information Ports (Monday, June 17, 10:30 a.m. - 12:15 p.m.) rtals re resent the Call centers and citizen information p P nexus between e-government and the good old-fashioned telephone. Constituents can use such systems e inn n contact gov- ernment for non -emergency Publicsafety, lic safety services. Find out what this hot new ology is all about and whether or not its for your government. ertc rnmolex ERP Matures: What's Next? (Monday, June 17, 1:30 p.m. - 3:15 p.m.) improving, ERP systems are continually expanding and imp g, offer- ing new functionality attuned to the needs of governments of all types and sizes. What are? these session will 'answeethese and why should governments care. questions and more. Financial Systems for Smaller Governments (Monday, June 17, 3:30 p.m. - 5 p.m-) In the effort to select and implement financial systems, , smalll- er governments face anoe ntsff This tset of session wpl examine nitis and risks than larger gernme the unique considerations of smaller incl ding an overview of acquisition of technology solutions, the alternatives now available in the market. IT Security and Disaster Planning: What Finance officers Should Know (Tuesday, June 18, 10:15 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.) The events of September 11 have raised everyone's conscious- ness about security issues, and government IT is no exception. This session will focus on a variety of security and disaster recovery concerns that apply to governments of all sizes, beginning with a discussion of GFOA's recommended practice on computer disaster recovery planning. outsourcing Information Technology and Financial Systems (Tuesday, June 18, 1:45 p.m. - 3:15 p.m.) There is a private service provider for virtually any aspect of information technology a government might wish to out - source. Collectively known ascosts xtorese firms can hlp smaller goveenmlarg e ns er governments reduce their gain access to technologies that would otherwise be outside their reach. This session will provide an overview of outsourc- ing opportunities and identify the issues that governments should be aware of. Next Generation Technologies for Public Finance (Wednesday, June 19, 8:30 a.m. - 10 a.m.) private A number of new technologies are taking off in the p sector, many of which have promising implications for public financial management. This session will explore potential applications of these new technologies in the public sector. afoa Discussion Groups Exchange ideas about day-to-day challenges in small groups of your colleagues. All discussion groups meet Tuesday, June 18, from 3:30 p.m. to 4:30 P.M. Accounting, Auditing, and Financial Reporting Cash Management and Investing • Internal Controls: Lessons from the Field • If 1 Had More Time I'd Write You a Shorter Letter! Preparing Popular Reports • Be All That You Can Be! Internal Auditing for Local Governments • "In Other Words... ": Explaining the New Model to Elected Officials Budgeting and Financial Planning • All Aboard! Getting Departments to Cut Spending • Measuring Up: Performance Measurement Fact and Fiction Preconference Seminars • Optimizing the Performance of the Revenue Collection Function Debt Management • Bond Ratings: Putting Your Best Foot Forward Management and Policy • Outsourcing: Learning from Successes and Failures • Strategies for Organizing and Staffing the Finance Office Pensions and Benefits • EGTRRA! EGTRRA! Learn All about It! Make the most of your travel to the GFOA 2002 Annual Conference by registering for one or more of the preconference semi- nars scheduled Friday and Saturday, June 14 and 15. Receive a 10 percent discount on both your conference and seminar regis- tration if you attend two preconference seminars in addition to the annual conference. Ne&v!'- Fraud Happens (Full Day: Friday, June 14,,9 a.m. - 5 p.m.) Auditors are not the only public -sector professionals who need to know about fraud. No state or local government financial man- ager can afford to ignore the possibility that fraud may occur. This one -day seminar uses a series of public -sector case studies to focus on proven techniques for detecting, investigating, and eliminating fraud. It also provides practical guidance on how to han- dle the aftermath of fraud once it has been uncovered. The perspectives offered are those of a seasoned public -sector fraud investigator who is both an auditor and an attorney. Designing and Implementing Performance Management Systems (Full Day. Friday, June 14, 9 a.m. - 5 p.m.) The goals of public budgeting have traditionally included accountability, efficiency, and effectiveness. These goals have led to an enduring interest in performance management. The desire to develop budgeting, management, and reporting systems that enhance the production and utilization of performance information related to a government's services, programs, processes, and activities has characterized numerous government reform efforts. This seminar will provide practical guidance and covers both basic and advanced topics. ERP Systems and Next Generation Technologies in Public Finance (Full Day: Saturday, June 15, 9 a.m. - 5 p.m.) State, provincial, and local governments have invested billions in modernizing their technology applications and infrastructure. The diffusion of technologies such as enterprise resource planning (ERP), e-procurement, and constituent relationship manage- ment (CRM) continues. But these areas are just the beginning stages of how technology is quietly changing how governments interact with their citizens, employees, and suppliers. Next -generation technologies, such as pervasive computing and wireless, also will expand in the coming years. This seminar presents the latest technology trends that are shaping the world of public finance and management. Seminar content will be relevant to state and local governments of all types and sizes. Motivating Public Employees (Half Day: Saturday, June 15, 1 p.m. - 5 p.m.) As the public sector copes with a turbulent economy and technological challenges, motivated and productive employees are crit- ical to organizational success. High-performance organizations need a workforce that is not only highly skilled from a techno- logical and process standpoint, but also one that is committed and continuously striving for excellence. The workplace of the 21st century will require a faster pace, entail more uncertainty, and require greater flexibility and adaptability from employees. While there is often much talk regarding the need to view people as an organization's most valuable assets, the reality is that not enough of a public manager's day is devoted to employee development. This seminar will provide motivational strategiesri improve public employee productivity. 6 i Register Online at www.gfoa.org 1 11 CPE Credits It is possible to earn 16 CPE credits at GFOXs annual confer- ence. Additional CPE credits can be earned by attending one or more of GFOXs preconference seminars. For your conven- ience, CPE credits will be tallied by electronic scans of your conference badge at sessions you attend. It is your responsi- bility to be sure your badge is scanned and to check the final record for accuracy. GFOA is registered with the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) as a sponsor of continuing profes- sional education on the National Registry of CPE CPE Sponsors. State boards of accountancy s r o N s o R s have final authority on the acceptance of individual courses for CPE credit. Complaints regarding registered sponsors may be addressed to the: National Registry of CPE Sponsors, 150 Fourth Avenue North, Nashville, TN 37219-2417. NASBA phone number: 615/880-4200. Web site:www.nasba.org. Certification Examination GFOXs Certified Public Finance Officer (CPFO) program con- tinues with the administration of all five examinations on Friday, June 14. For an application packet, please call GFOA at 312/977-9700; fax your request to 312/977-4806; or e-mail your request to Certification@gfoa.org. 0 Conference and preconference seminar cancellations, registration changes, and refund requests must be made in writing to GFOA. Cancellations postmarked by this date will be refunded, less a 25 percent service fee. Cancellations postmarked after April 15 but by May 31 will be refunded, less a 50 percent service fee. No refunds will be issued after this date ACTION To take advantage of discounts, register today! April 15, 2002 Second and final discount deadline. April 16, 2002 11Full registration fee required. Register Online at www.gfoa.org Save Money By Registering Now Register online at www.gfoa.org or fill out the form in this brochure and mail or fax it to GFOA. Phone registrations can- not be accepted. Check the registration discount dates and save money by registering early. • Guest registration: Guests and children of delegates must be registered to attend the GFOA Welcome Reception. Conference sessions and the luncheons on Monday and \I,., Tuesday are not open to guests and children. There is no registration fee for guests or children. Please pre -register ail guests and children so badges will be prepared. • Substitutions (government entities only): A one -for - one substitution of a nonmember for an active member is allowed. If your organization has a current GFOA member on the staff who is not attending conference, a nonmember may attend in his or her place at the lower member rate. Please provide the name or the membership number of the GFOA member. • Registration fee discounts: To qualify for fee discounts, payment must be received by the deadline dates listed. • Additional discounts: You will receive a 10 percent dis- count on both your conference and preconference seminar registration if one of the following conditions applies: a) five or more people from your jurisdiction are attending the annual conference (registrations must be submitted together) or b) you are attending two preconference semi- nars in addition to the annual conference. • Meals: Registration includes Monday and Tuesday lunch- eons and a light meal at the Sunday Welcome Reception. Getting There Take advantage of GFOA's special fares for conference dele- gates and guests with American Airlines, Frontier Airlines, and Amtrak. To obtain these discount--far_es,__Jickets-Must be -pur- chased trough--_GF.OA's traveV-agent Ticketl9..Hi.de__Travel. Call toll free 800/848-8882 between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. Central time for airfare and car rental quotes and reserva- tions. Call 8001848-8882 for special travel rates. An j �J 1 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: April 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Approval of a California Department of Conservation Grant for a Recycling Program RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve the grant application for a California Department of Conservation Grant to conduct a beverage container recycling program. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The City is eligible to receive $7,467 for the 2002/2003 fiscal year to conduct beverage container recycling or litter reduction activities. Approval of this item would allow the City to submit the required application to receive these funds. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Every year, the California Department of Conservation allocates funds to cities and counties to conduct beverage container recycling (glass, plastic, and aluminum) and litter reduction programs. Cities receive at least $5,000 plus additional funds based on population. This year, the City of La Quinta is eligible to receive $7,467. To receive these funds, the City must submit a grant application describing proposed activities by April 30, 2002. The City wishes to take advantage of this funding opportunity to complement the last two year's grant awards. The first year of this program (2000/2001) the City purchased beverage container recycling bins for permanent installation next to trash receptacles in City parks. Last year (2001 /2002), the City ordered additional containers to fully cover the City's existing parks. In addition, containers were ordered for the La Quinta Park, the Civic Center Campus, and the Desert Club Manor Park — all of which are currently under construction. The containers will be stored at the Public Works Yard until these parks are complete and installation can occur. Also with 2001 /2002 funds, a "Gamby: La Quinta Recycles" refrigerator 14 magnet was ordered and will be available for the Community Services Department to pass out at City events. To continue the promotion of bottle and glass recycling in the City of La Quinta, it is proposed that this year's grant funds be used to purchase mobile recycling containers (Attachment 1). Four thousand dollars ($4,000) has been estimated for the purchase of twelve of these containers that are a Rubbermaid product and lightweight enough to move easily from place to place (Attachment 2). These containers will be used at City -sponsored community events such as the City picnic, the Soap Box Derby, and other events where the need for beverage recycling containers is likely. We will also offer the containers for use at events not sponsored by the City, but held at City facilities. The Department of Conservation also suggests that grantees may want to make mobile bins available by request from organizations and groups. Approximately $3,000 of the grant award has been set aside for promotion of the availability and potential use of these mobile containers by members of the community. Payment to the City is expected by June 30, 2002, at which time staff will proceed to order the mobile recycling bins and develop promotional materials. Funds must be expended by June 30, 2003. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the grant application for a California Department of Conservation Grant to conduct a beverage container recycling program; or 2. Do not approve the grant application for a California Department of Conservation Grant to conduct a beverage container recycling program; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, X Susan Matthew, Management Assistant Approved for submission by- Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Draft Grant Application 2. Photograph of Bottle & Can Recycling Container 14� ATTACHMENT 1 Please complete this form and return to the Department of Conservation by April 30, 2002. If your mailing or contact information is incorrect, please make the necessary changes. Field Representative: Tina Muncie City/County Name Eligible Funding Amounts Funding Cycles CITY OF LA QUINTA $7,764.00 FY 2002/2003 City/County Mailing Address City County State Zip Federal ID or Tax La Quinta Riverside CA 92253-1504 Reporting # P. O. Box 1504 95-3740431 City/County Contact Person Telephone Number Fax Number E-Mail Address Susan Matthew (760) 777-7140 (760) 777-7101 smatthew@la-quinta.org Please check if you are a: Name of Lead Agency or JPA Submitting Form on Behalf of City /County Lead Agency or JPA Lead Agency/JPA Mailing Address City County State Zip Federal ID or Tax Reporting # Lead Agency /JPA Contact Person Telephone Number Fax Number E-Mail Address Identify your beverage container activity(ies) that you plan on implementing with your city/county payment program funds. Include estimated dollar amounts. Check all boxes that apply. Subtotal $4,000.00 []Airports [-]Theme Parks ®Recycling Bins ❑Restaurants/Bars ❑Gas Stations ❑Curbside Collection Services []Special Events ❑Shopping Mall []Drop -Off Collection Services ❑Public Transit ❑Hotels ❑Theatres []Governmental Buildings X Civic Centers ❑Businesses ❑College/University ❑Sports Complexes X City/County Parks ❑Other 4 ME Subtotal $ ❑Commercial ❑Apartments ❑Residential ❑Other ❑Mobile Home Parks ❑Senior Housing ❑Collection Services ❑Condominiums ❑Rec clin2 Bins ❑Su lies/Liners/Gloves I Subtotal $ []Events ❑Beach ❑Roadway ❑Other ❑Public Parks []Adopt -A-: []School ❑Volunteer Incentives ❑Recreational Areas ❑S orts Com lexes ffi Subtotal $3,467.00 ❑Promotional items ❑Billboard/Signs ❑Newsletter/Brochures ❑Other []Utility Bill Insert X Direct Mail X Print Ads X Web Page Ad ❑Media (TV, Radio, Video) ❑Local Media Ads With The Department's Assistance in Media Buys Subtotal $ ❑School Education ❑Recycling Hotline ❑Brochures/Flyers ❑Other ❑Workshops ❑Exhibits/Demos []Fairs ❑Bulletin Board ❑Assemblies ❑Educational Packets ❑Public Education ❑Rec clip Guide ❑Pu et Show/Live Production a Subtotal $3,467 Recycling Coordinator ❑Contractor/Consultant ❑Other ❑Grant Administration ❑Staff 4 ,a 1 /02 4 • Describe the goals or outcomes (versus outputs) to be achieved. (Examples: 1) Change in volume of beverage containers recycled; 2) Change in beverage container recycling awareness.) To continue the promotion and awareness of bottle and glass recycling in the City of La Quinta by providing glutton bottle and can recycling containers at community events and festivals where the need for beverage recycling containers is likely. Containers will be purchased that are lightweight enough to move easily from place to place and will be stored at the City's public works yard. These mobile containers will also be made available, by request, from organizations and groups sponsoring events at City facilities. • Explain how the projected outcomes will be measured and measurement data collected. The recycling containers will be put in place and then picked up by City public works employees and recycling materials placed in a City recycling bin located at the City's public works yard. Collection is by Waste Management of the Desert who monitors the volume of recycling materials collected. Requests for the containers by organizations and groups in the community will be tracked and recorded. • Has your city/county prohibited the siting of a supermarket site, caused a ❑Yes ®No supermarket site to close its business or adopted a land use policy that restricts or prohibits the siting of a supermarket site within its jurisdiction since 1/1/2000? If yes, please provide an explanation. (Provide a copy of any policy or ordinance relating to beverage container recycling.) • Program/Project Evaluation: Briefly describe the outcomes (effectiveness of your project(s) funded in fiscal year 1999/2000 (first cycle). ( Examples: 1) Change in volume of beverage containers recycled as measured by pre/post tonnage reports, 2) Change in beverage container recycling awareness as measured by pre/post consumer surveys.) In 2000/01, city/county payment funds were spent on the purchase of 10 recycling containers that were permanently installed in City parks. Promotional materials were developed and distributed in City utility bills to advise of this new program made possible because of a grant from the Department of Conservation. Recycling in the Park is a theme that will be continued with 2001/02 city/county payment funds. Waste Management of the Desert provided a collection bin located at the City's public works yard for the deposit of recycling materials collected from City parks. Collections have averaged 350 Ibs per month of glass, plastic, and aluminum recyclables that would have otherwise been placed in regular trash containers. SELF -CERTIFICATION l (name) Thomas P. Genovese (title) City Manager certify that the city or county of has expended $5, 544. 50 from the Department of Conservation's 200012001 city/county payment program for beverage container recycling activities. THE SUBMISSION OF FALSE INFORMATION WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD /S A CRIME PUNISHABLE BY SUBSTANTIAL FINES, UP TO THREE YEARS IMPRISONMENT, OR BOTH. KNOWING THIS, I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED HEREIN ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. Signature of Representative or Designee Authorized to Expend Funds Title (Named on Resolution) City Manager Printed Name of Above Representative or Designee Date Thomas P. Genovese 1/4/02 1 his Corm must be received by April 30, 2002. Send to: Department of Conservation, Division of Recycling, Community Outreach Branch, City/County Payments, 801 K Street, MS 20-24, Sacramento, CA 95814-3533, fax (916) 322-8758 r , j 02 J Glutton Bottle & Can Recycling Container OFFICE CONTAINERS DE&j im CowAtwits SPEQAtJY COMMAIM MOSIi£ CONTAINERS ATTACHMENT 2 Glutton Bottle & Can Recycling Container° Dimensions: 25 1 /2"L x 22 3/4"W x 31 1 /8"H Capacity: 56 Gallons Please call for ordering information, quantity discounts and shipping quote: 1-800-927-3873 0,,6 aj T4,V11 4 49mrA AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL,/RDA MEETING DATE: April 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution of Intention to Approve an Amendment to the Contract Between the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council of the City of La Quinta to Provide Military Service Credit RECOMMENDATION: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a resolution of intent to approve an amendment to the contract between the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council of the City of La Quinta to provide military service credit. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The proposed contract amendment will not have a financial impact on the City. The proposed action would not precipitate any future increase in the City's contribution rate for retirement. The full cost for the purchase of military time as public service credit is assumed by the employee. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: As part of the most recent labor contact negotiations with the La Quinta City Employees Association (LQCEA), there was an agreement that the City would pursue an amendment to the California Public Employees Public Employees Retirement System (CaIPERS) contact. This contract amendment would allow eligible City employees to seek military service credit as public employment service years. Employees may solicit from CaIPERS up to four (4) years of service credit for an equivalent number of years of military service. The full cost associated for this conversion is assumed by the employee. In order to amend the current contract, CaIPERS requires the City to file a resolution of intent to modify the contract. 15 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a resolution of intent to approve an amendment to the contract between the Board of Administration of CalPERS and the City Council of the City of La Quinta to provide military service credit; or 2. Do not adopt a resolution of intent to approve an amendment to the contract between the Board of Administration of CalPERS and the City Council of the City of La Quinta to provide military service credit; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 08/11 /99 S:\CITYMGR\CCSHELL.WPD RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM TO PROVIDE MILITARY SERVICE CREDIT WHEREAS, the Public Employees' Retirement Law permits the participation of public agencies and their employees in the Public Employees' Retirement System by the execution of a contract, and sets forth the procedure by which said public agencies may elect to subject themselves and their employees to amendments to said Law; and WHEREAS, one of the steps in the procedures to amend this contract is the adoption by the governing body of the public agency of a resolution giving notice of its intention to approve an amendment to said contract, which resolution shall contain a summary of the change proposed in said contract; and WHEREAS, the following is a statement of the proposed change: To provide Section 21024 (Military Service Credit as Public Service) for local miscellaneous members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: That the City Council of the City of La Quinta does hereby give notice of intention to approve an amendment to the contract between the City of La Quinta and the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto as Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part hereof. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16th day of April, 2002, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 03 Resolution No. 2002- Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 2 ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON , City Attorney City of La Quinta, California CaIPERS California Public Employees' Retirement System Between the Board of Administration EXHIBIT A California. Public Employees' Retirement System and tine City Council City of LaQu rota The Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System, hereinafter referred to as Board, and the governing body of the above public agency, hereinafter referred to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective December 16, 1983, and witnessed November 1, 1983, and as amended effective November 12, 1988, November 2, 1990, January 18, 1991 and November 1, 1991 which provides for participation of Public Agency. in said System, Board and Public Agency hereby agree as follows: A. Paragraphs 1 through 11 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed effective November 1, 1991, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs numbered 1 through 11 inclusive: 1. All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein unless otherwise specifically provided. "Normal retirement age" shall mean age 55 for local miscellaneous members. 2. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement System from and after December 16, 1983 making its employees as hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to all provisions of the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on election of a contracting agency and are not provided for herein and to all amendments to said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by express provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contracting r agency. 00 5 PLEASE DO NOT SIGN "EXHIBIT 01'7_": 3. Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as are excluded by law or this agreement: a. Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as local miscellaneous members). 4. In addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not become members of said Retirement System: a. SAFETY EMPLOYEES. 5. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a local miscellaneous member shall be determined in accordance with Section 21354 of said Retirement Law (2% at age 55 Full). 6. Public Agency elected and elects to be subject to the following optional provisions: a. Section 20938 (Limit Prior Service to Members Employed on Contract Date). b. Section 21573 (Third Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits). C. Section 20042 (One -Year Final Compensation). d. Section 21024 (Military Service Credit as Public Service), Statutes of 1976. 7. Public Agency, in accordance with Government Code Section 20834, shall not be considered an "employer" for purposes of the Public Employees' Retirement Law. Contributions of the Public Agency shall be fixed and determined as provided in Government Code Section 20834, and such contributions hereafter made shall be held by the Board as provided in Government Code Section 20834. 8. Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions determined by actuarial valuations of prior and future service liability with respect to local miscellaneous members of said Retirement System. 9. Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as follows: a. Contributions required per covered member on account of the 1959 Survivor Benefits provided under Section 21573 of said Retirement Law. (Subject to annual change.) In addition, all assets and liabilities of Public Agency and its employees shall be pooled in a single account, based on term insurance rates, for survivors of all r- , local miscellaneous members. v b. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment within 60 days of date of contract to cover the costs of administering said System as it affects the employees of Public Agency, not including the costs of special valuations or of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. C. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. 10. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public Employees' Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and valuation required by said Retirement Law. 11. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid by Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days after the end of the period to which said contributions refer or as may be prescribed by Board regulation. If more or less than the correct amount of contributions is paid for any period, proper adjustment shall be made in connection with subsequent remittances. Adjustments on account of errors in contributions required;of any employee may be made by direct payments between the employee and the Board. B. This amendment -shall be effekt e' on the day of , BOARD OF ADMINISTRATIO7 CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETREMENT SYSTEM CITY OF LAQUINTA 1 y BY BY ' KENNETH W. MAR,,Z46N, CHIEF PRESIDING OFFIC . ACTUARIAL & EMPLOYER SERVICES DIVISION PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM Witnei ate Attest: Clerk AMENDMENT PERS-CON-702A (Rev. 8\96) 0 '7 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: April 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Approval of Plans, Specifications and Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Cost and Authorization to Advertise for Bids for the Washington Street/Eisenhower Drive Reconstruction Project, Project No. 2001-02 and Adoption of a Resolution Making Certain Findings Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a). AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: /0q-1-0 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Appropriate $600,000 from City Infrastructure Funds, Account No. 225-000-300-290 toward the Washington Street/Eisenhower Drive Reconstruction Project No. 2001-02; Approve a Resolution of the City Council making certain findings pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a); Approve the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) and authorize staff to advertise for bid for the Washington Street Pavement Reconstruction Improvements, Project No. 2001-02; and Authorize staff to modify the proposed scope of work for the Eisenhower Drive rehabilitation improvements to include median islands and median island landscape improvements. Considering City Council approval of staff's recommendation, the following represents the proposed funding and funding sources: Infrastructure Funds (225-000-300-290): $600,000.00 RDA Project Area No. 1 Funds (405-000-300-290): $1,200,000.00 Total Funding Available: $1,800,000.00 15 IIJ T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020416e.wpd The following represents the proposed estimated project budget: Construction: $1,354,500.00 Insp/Test/Survey: $139, 500.00 Administration: $90,000.00 Professional: $36,000.00 Contingency: $180,000.00 Total: $1, 800, 000. 00 This project is partially funded with RDA Project Area No. 1 funds and must be bid utilizing prevailing wage requirements. Therefore, there are no charter city implications. During the winter season 2000/2001, the City experienced a number of heavy rain events. During this time, areas of Washington Street between Avenue 48 and Highway 111 experienced road failures. The highest concentration of failures appeared between Avenue 48 and Simon Drive and varied from sinking pavement and alligator cracking to pavement potholes and "pop -outs." Eisenhower Drive has also experienced accelerated failure due to weather, age, and increased traffic. Due to the accelerated failures, the City Manager declared the pavement reconstruction an emergency. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 3.32 D, "The City Manager may authorize the solicitation, selection, award, and execution of service contracts by the most expeditious method where time is of the essence to prevent an emergency lack of critically needed services. If the contract is for major services, it shall be submitted for ratification at the next regular City Council Meeting." On April 17, 2001, the City Council ratified the City Manager's decision in declaring the Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive pavement failure an emergency situation and authorized the Public Works Department to utilize the most expedient method to select a qualified Professional Consultant to analyze the cause of the failure and design the permanent reconstruction measures. The City Council also approved a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) in an amount not to exceed $66,000 with the firm Harris & Associates, to prepare the PS&E for the reconstruction of the failed areas on Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive and the rehabilitation of the finished surface of Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive with a rubberized asphalt overlay. The project limits are as follows: Washington Street - from approximately 1,700 feet North of Avenue 50 0 Simon Drive. r 5 --) T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020416e.wpd 002 .J Eisenhower Drive - from Washington Street to Coachella Drive. The PS&E for Washington Street are now complete and available for review within the Public Works Department. Expanding the Eisenhower Drive pavement reconstruction plans to include the construction of median islands and median island landscaping will result in cost efficiencies. Therefore, staff are recommending the PS&E be amended to include the design of the ultimate median islands and median island landscaping. Assuming authorization to receive bids for the Washington Street pavement reconstruction improvements and authorization to amend the Eisenhower Drive pavement reconstruction PS&E, the following represents how the project is expected to proceed: Amend PS&E Approve PS&E/Auth. to Receive Bids Bid Period Approval to Award Construction Construction Period Accept Improvements April 16, 2002 April 17, 2002 - May 16, 2002 June 4, 2002 Eisenhower April 17, 2002 - July 1, 2002 July 2, 2002 July 3, 2002 - August 2, 2002 August 20, 2002 June 2002 - August September 2002 - 2002 November 2002 September 2002 December 2002 The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Appropriate $600,000 from City Infrastructure Funds, Account No. 225-000- 300-290 toward the Washington Street/Eisenhower Drive Reconstruction Project No. 2001-02; approve a Resolution of the City Council making certain findings pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a); approve the Plans, Specifications and Engineer's Estimate and authorize staff to advertise for bid for the Washington Street Pavement Reconstruction Improvements, Project No. 2001-02; and authorize staff to modify the proposed scope of work for the Eisenhower Drive reconstruction improvements to include median islands and median island landscape improvements; or, i T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020416e.wpd 003 ,,. l 2. Do not appropriate $600,000 from City Infrastructure Funds, Account No. 225- 000-300-290 toward the Washington Street/Eisenhower Drive Reconstruction Project No. 2001-02; do not approve a Resolution of the City Council making certain findings pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a); do not approve the Plans, Specifications and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) and authorize staff to advertise for bid for the Washington Street Pavement Reconstruction Improvements, Project No. 2001-02; and do not authorize staff to modify the proposed scope of work for the Eisenhower Drive reconstruction improvements to include median islands and median island landscape improvements; or, 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, 9N 0. Oe R y F. Stephenson, P.E. In rim Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020416e.wpd 004 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445(a) WHEREAS, the City Council on April 17, 2001 ratified the City Managers decision in declaring the Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive pavement failure and emergency situation and authorize the most expedient method to select a qualified Professional Consultant, to analyze the cause of the failure, and design the permanent reconstruction measures. WHEREAS, the City Council on April 17, 2001 approved a Professional Services Agreement (PSA), in the amount not to exceed $66,000.00, with the firm Harris & Associates, to prepare the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) for the reconstruction of the failed areas on Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive and, the rehabilitation of the finished surface of the Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive with a rubberized asphalt overlay. WHEREAS, the Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive Rehabilitation and Reconstruction are located in the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency's Project Area land 2, and will enhance the public's use within Project Area 1 and 2; WHEREAS, there is inadequate funding available from La Quinta Redevelopment Agency's Project Area 2 to proceed with the Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive Rehabilitation and Reconstruction at this point in time in Project Area 2; WHEREAS, the funding for the Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive Rehabilitation and Reconstruction is not otherwise available at this time; WHEREAS, it would be in the best interest of the public for the Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive Rehabilitation and Reconstruction to be installed at this point in time. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a), the City Council finds: (a) That the Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive Rehabilitation and Reconstruction will be of benefit to the Project Area 1, to the area surrounding Project Area 1, and to the immediate neighborhood in which the Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive Rehabilitation and Reconstruction will be located. (b) That no other reasonable means of financing the Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive Rehabilitation and Reconstruction in Project Area 2 are available to the community at this time. The RDA Capital Improvement Project No. 2 fund currently does not have sufficient funds I f� 005 to pay for the construction, and will not accumulate sufficient funds for that purpose within the near future. Nor are the funds otherwise available from other sources. (c) That the payment of funds for the construction of the Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive Rehabilitation and Reconstruction will assist in the elimination of one or more blighting conditions inside the project area and is consistent with the implementation plan adopted pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33490. (d) That the construction of the Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive Rehabilitation and Reconstruction are consistent with the implementation plan adopted pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 33490, in that the Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive Rehabilitation and Reconstruction are identified as Facilities/Infrastructure Improvements. The estimated cost associated with the proposed improvements are presented in Exhibit A. SECTION 2. The City Council therefore consents to the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency funding of the improvement costs in the amount of $1,200,000.00 for the Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive Rehabilitation and Reconstruction in Project Area 2 with La Quinta Redevelopment Agency Project Area 1 funds. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16h day of April 2002, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Council Members NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON , City Attorney City of La Quinta, California JOHN L. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California -2- 006 City of La Quinta Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements, Project No. 2001-02 Final Estimate of Probable Construction Cost October 23, 2001 Item Unit Estimated Quantity Estimated Unit Cost Extended Remarks 1 Mobilization LS 1 $50 000 5% +/- of construction 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $22 500 $750/dav x 30 days 3 Remove and Reconstruct Existing PCC Cross Gutter LS 1 $3,000 West leg of Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive 4 Sawcut and Removal Existing AC Pavement and Excavate for Proposed Structural Section CY 1,550 $15.00 $23,250 6" to 8" depth 5 Coldmill Existing AC Pavement SY 47,590 $1.50 $71 385 Maximum depth = 2" 6 Construct AC Base Course TON 3 120 $45.00 $140 400 Pavement repair areas 6" to 8" depth 7 Rewood Header LF 3 400 $3.00 $10 200 Alon xisting edge of pavement 8 Construct 1/2" AC Leveling Course TON 3,070 $45.00 $138 150 9 Construct 1 1/2" ARHM TON 8,270 $68.00 $562 360 10 Traffic Signal Detector Loos EA 60 $400.00 $24 000 11 Adjust Sanitary Sewer Manhole Frame and Cover to Grade EA 8 $350.00 $2,800 12 Adjust Water Valve Cover to Grade EA 30 $250.00 $7 500 13 Adjust Monument Well Cover to Grade EA 2 $400.00 $800 14 Strip ng and Legends LS 1 $55 000 Subtotal = $1,111,345 Contingency (10%) = $111,13 5 Total Estimated Construction Cost = $1,222,480 finalestimate EXHIBIT A 007 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: June Greek, City Clerk )ey DATE: April 12, 2002 SUBJECT: Engineer's Report for Landscape and Lighting \ Assessment District 89-1 for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. City Council Consent Calendar Item No.10 was removed from the agenda subsequent to the posting of the agenda. 1� AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: ` COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: April 16, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: Consideration of Resolution Making Findings Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445 Relating to Option Agreement by and Between the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency and KSL Land Holdings, Inc., Pertaining to the Purchase of 525 Acres of Property Known as The Ranch and Generally Bounded by the Coral Reef Mountains, Avenue 52, Jefferson Street, and Avenue 54, and Consenting to the Funding Therefor RECOMMENDATION: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council making certain findings pursuant to Health and Safety Code 33445 to approve use of funds from the La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area No. 1 for an Option Agreement by and between the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency and KSL Land Holdings, Inc. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: This action could result in the expenditure of up to $42,500,000 to purchase the Ranch property if escrow closes by July 2, 2002. The Option Agreement requires an expenditure of $100,000, generally non-refundable but applied toward the purchase price, for an option on the property through May 22, 2002. The Agreement provides for closing extensions until October 31, 2002. These extensions would cost the Agency $212,500 per month for every month starting July 2002. If escrow did not close until October 31, 2002, then the total purchase price would be $43,350,000. Ultimately, the funds used to underwrite this purchase will be $20,000,000 of existing Project No. 1 bond proceeds, and $22,500,000 of new bond proceeds derived from the sale of additional Project No. 1 Tax Allocation Bonds. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: This item was continued from the April 9, 2002, Special Meeting to this date for review and consideration. The City Council may refer to the Redevelopment Agency report for a full discussion of possible Agency actions on this matter. In order to use Redevelopment Agency funding for the option payment referred to in that report, the City Council must make certain findings pursuant to Health and Safety Code 33445. These findings are outlined in the attached resolution. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council making certain findings pursuant to Health and Safety Code 33445 to approve use of funds from the La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area No. 1 for an Option Agreement by and between the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency and KSL Land Holdings, Inc.; or 2. Do not approve the Resolution; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, N Mark Weiss Assistant City Manager Approved for submission by: u Thomas P. Genovese City Manager g: k'sdoc/mw/ks1/ks1ranchcs41602 1 1 O� RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445(a) WHEREAS, the City Council on May 15, 2001 approved the 2001-02 Economic Development Plan which includes implementation policies supporting economic diversification, business expansion, economic protection and preservation, and recreational opportunities; and WHEREAS, The Ranch property is located in Redevelopment Project Area 1, and includes 525 acres suitable to attain the aforementioned objectives; and WHEREAS, an Option Agreement is a suitable vehicle to allow the Agency an opportunity to complete due diligence activities prior to property acquisition; and WHEREAS, the lack of recreational opportunities and amenities is one of the conditions within the Project Area 1 which was found to create blight; and WHEREAS, there is inadequate funding within the City's General Fund or from other sources to acquire The Ranch; and WHEREAS, it would be in the best interest of the public to pursue acquisition of The Ranch property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a), the City Council finds that: (a) Entering into the Option Agreement for possible acquisition of The Ranch property will be of benefit to the Project Area and to the immediate neighborhood in which The Ranch is located. (b) No other reasonable means of financing the Option Agreement at this time exist and alternative funds will not accumulate for that purpose in the near future. (c) The payment of funds for the Option Agreement and possible purchase of The Ranch will assist in the elimination of one or more blighting conditions inside the project area, including the lack of recreational facilities and opportunities, and is consistent with the implementation plan adopted pursuant to Section 33490. SECTION 2. The City Council therefore consents to the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency appropriating funding for the Option Agreement for possible acquisition of The Ranch. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16t" day of April, 2002, by the vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN L. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 01,14 aj T414f 4 QuArA AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: April 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of an Ordinance of the City of La Quinta Authorizing an Amendment to the Contract Between the City Council of the City of La Quinta and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System to Provide Military Service Credit RECOMMENDATION: BUSINESS SESSION: A— CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Introduce an ordinance of the City of La Quinta authorizing an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of La Quinta and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System to provide military service credit. 1. Move to take up Ordinance No. reading. 2. Move to introduce Ordinance No. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: by title and number only and waive further on first reading. The ordinance would implement an amendment to the City's current contract for retirement benefits with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CaIPERS). This action would not precipitate any future increase in the City's contribution rate for retirement. The full cost for the purchase of military time as public service credit is assumed by the employee. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: As part of the most recent labor contact negotiations with the La Quinta City Employees Association (LQCEA), there was an agreement that the City would pursue an amendment to the CalPERS contact. This contract amendment would allow eligible City employees to seek military service credit as public employment service years. Employees may solicit from CalPERS up to four (4) years of public service credit for an equivalent number of years of military service. The full cost associated for this conversion is assumed by the employee. In order to amend the current contract, CalPERS requires the City to adopt an ordinance. Adoption of the ordinance will not require the City to codify it in the municipal code. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Introduce an ordinance of the City of La Quinta authorizing an amendment to the contract between the City Council and the Board of Administration of CalPERS to provide military service credit; or 2. Do not introduce an ordinance of the City of La Quinta authorizing an amendment to the contract between the City Council and Board of Administration of CalPERS to provide military service credit; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Approved for submission by: ,,2 Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That an amendment to the contract between the City of La Quinta and the Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System, is hereby authorized, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, marked Exhibit A, and by such reference made a part hereof as though herein set out in full. SECTION 2. The City Manager of the City of La Quinta is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said amendment for and on behalf of the City. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its adoption, and prior to the expiration of 15 days from the passage thereof shall be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of La Quinta and thence from and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of May, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California Ordinance No. Adopted: Page _ ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 1(° 004 Ordinance No. Adopted: Page STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss. CITY OF LA QUINTA ) I, JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No. *(enter number) which was introduced at a regular meeting on the ♦(Clerk's Office will enter) day of ♦(Clerk's Office will enter) and was adopted at a regular meeting held on the ♦(Clerk's Office will enter) day of*(Clerk's Office will enter) not being less than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof. I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the City of La Quinta as specified in a Resolution of the City Council. JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California DECLARATION OF POSTING I, JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on ♦(Clerk's Office will enter), pursuant to Council Resolution. JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 005 CaIPERS California Public Employees' Retirement System Between the Board of Administration EXHIBIT A California Public Employees) Retirement System and the City Council City of LaQuinta The Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System, hereinafter referred to as Board, and the governing body of the above public agency, hereinafter referred to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective December 16, 1983, and witnessed November 1, 1983, and as amended effective November 12, 1988, November 2, 1990, January 18, 1991 and November 1, 1991 which provides for participation of Public Agency, in said System, Board and Public Agency hereby agree as follows: A. Paragraphs 1 through 11 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed effective November 1, 1991, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs numbered 1 through 11 inclusive: 1. All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein unless otherwise specifically provided. "Normal retirement age" shall mean age 55 for local miscellaneous members. 2. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement System from and after December 16, 1983 making its employees as hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to all provisions of the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on election of a contracting agency and are not provided for herein and to all amendments to said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by 1 express provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contracting agency. PLEASE DO NOT SIGN "EXHIBIT OP1 -1 ,"' 3. Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as are excluded by law or this agreement: a. Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as local miscellaneous members). 4. In addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not become members of said Retirement System: a. SAFETY EMPLOYEES. 5. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a local miscellaneous member shall be determined in accordance with Section 21354 of said Retirement Law (2% at age 55 Full). 6. Public Agency elected and elects to be subject to the following optional provisions: a. Section 20938 (Limit Prior Service to Members Employed on Contract Date). b. Section 21573 (Third Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits). C. Section 20042 (One -Year Final Compensation). d. Section 21024 (Military Service Credit as Public Service), Statutes of 1976. 7. Public Agency, in accordance with Government Code Section 20834, shall not be considered an "employer" for purposes of the Public Employees' Retirement Law. Contributions of the Public Agency shall be fixed and determined as provided in Government Code Section 20834, and such contributions hereafter made shall be held by the Board as provided in Government Code Section 20834. 8. Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions determined by actuarial valuations of prior and future service liability with respect to local miscellaneous members of said Retirement System. 9. Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as follows: a. Contributions required per covered member on account of the 1959 Survivor Benefits provided under Section 21573 of said Retirement Law. (Subject to annual change.) In addition, all assets and liabilities of Public Agency and its employees shall be pooled in a single account, based on term insurance rates, for survivors of all ►� ;� local miscellaneous members. .7 b. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment within 60 days of date of contract to cover the costs of administering said System as it affects the employees of Public Agency, not including the costs of special valuations or of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. C. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. 10. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public Employees' Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and valuation required by said Retirement Law. 11. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid by Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days after the end of the period to which said contributions refer or as may be prescribed by Board regulation. If more or less than the correct amount of contributions is paid for any period, proper adjustment shall be made in connection with subsequent remittances. Adjustments on account of errors in contributions required,of any employee may be made by direct payments between the empl we and the Board. B. This amendment shall be effectie on the day of , BOARD OF ADMINISTRATIONJ, CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETtR&MENT SYSTEM CITY OF LAQUINTA BY BY KENNETH W. MN, CHIEF PRESIDING OFFIC R,, ACTUARIAL & E. OYER SERVICES DIVISION IN�'L S O PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM Witnej ate i Attest: Clerk AMENDMENT { i PERS-CON-702A (Rev. 8\96) �1 T a 0 44f 4 4 a" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: April 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of a Community Services Grant Request by Martin Langer to Produce a Community Concert Series RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: The Special Projects Contingency Account has a balance of $10,757. Mr. Langer is requesting $25,000 for a series of five community concerts. Should the City Council approve Mr. Langer's request to provide one community concert, $5,000 could be made available from the Special Projects Contingency Account #101-251-663-000 to fund one community concert this fiscal year. Additional funding available for Fiscal Year 2001-02 to fund the entire series (five concerts) would require an appropriation from the General Fund Un-designated Reserve Account #101-000-300-290. Another option available for City Council consideration would be to direct staff to include this request in the Fiscal Year 2002-03 budget document. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the February 19, 2002 City Council meeting, the City Council discussed Mr. Martin Langer's request for funding in the amount of $25,000 to conduct five community concerts. The matter was referred to the Cultural Arts Commission for consideration. The Cultural Arts Commission considered Mr. Langer's request for funding to conduct a series of five community concerts, to be held at the La Quinta Middle School Amphitheater. Mr. Langer assured the Cultural Arts Commission that the amount requested would be an all-inclusive cost and would not involve staff time in any manner. After some discussion, the Commission voted to recommend Mr. Langer's funding request with the condition that Mr. Langer provide a list of entertainment in which the City Council could select the performing groups. 1� At the Cultural Arts Commission meeting, staff presented the City's purchasing procedures as provided in the La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 3.12.080 which states that for purchases over $2,501 to $10,000, open market or informal bidding procedure is required. Under section 3.12.240 "Open market purchases shall, whenever possible, be based on at least three informal bids, and shall be awarded to the bidder offering the most advantageous bid to the City after consideration of price, quality, durability, servicing, delivery time, standardization and other factors." The Commission determined that Mr. Langer was the first individual to approach the City to request funding to provide this service, and the Commission would like to offer free musical events to the community, therefore, additional artists would not be notified of the opportunity to provide a bid for such services. The Commission recommended Mr. Langer's request to provide a free concert series to the community at the La Quinta Middle School Amphitheater be funded. The City Council considered Mr. Langer's request at the April 2, 2002 City Council meeting. After some discussion, the City Council asked Mr. Langer to confirm with Desert Sands Unified School District that the La Quinta Middle School Amphitheater is available for the following dates: May 26, June 2, June 9, June 16 and June 30, 2002. Mr. Langer has received notification from Desert Sands Unified School District that the facility is available, as well as the indoor multi -purpose room in case of inclement weather, as provided in Attachment 1. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the funding request by Mr. Langer in the amount of $5,000 for one community concert to be funded by the Special Projects Contingency Account; or 2. Approve the funding request by Mr. Langer in a different amount from the Special Projects Contingency Account ; or 3. Approve the funding request by Mr. Langer in the amount of $25,000 to be funded by the General Fund Un-designated Reserve Account; or 4. Direct staff to include an amount in Fiscal Year budget 2002-03 to fund the concert series; or 5. Direct staff to receive informal bids for services to provide a community concert series to be held at the La Quinta Middle School Amphitheater; or 6. Do not approve the funding request by Mr. Langer; or 7. Provide staff with alternative direction. 1 f "3 �J 2 S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.196.Langer Grant Request.wpd Respegtfully slobmitted, Dodie Horvitz,'CgLVnunity Services Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Information Received from Mr. Langer Regarding Facility Availability 0 3 S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.196.Langer Grant Request.wpd FROM FAX NO. : 19498543314 Apr. 10 2002 10:56AM P1 ATTACHMENT 1 Martin banger Director e_ April 9, 2002 FAX # (?60)777- To : Dodie Horvitz From: Martin Langer Subject; LA QUINTA CIVIC SERIES/UPDATE This is to acknowledge the dates and confirmed availability of both the venue site and entertainment attractions - at this writing. We are on hold pending the council meeting final decision on Tuesday, April 16th.. Sunday, May 25, 2002 Memorial Day .Event 5:00 PM Sunday, lure 2, 2002 5:00 PM Sunday, June 9. 2002 5:00 PM Sunday. June 16, 2002 5 : 00 PSI Sunday, June 30, 2002 patriotic Theme 5:00 PM Golden West International Symphonic Band Downbeat '8i,g Band Orchestra Dixieland Riverboat Ramble.i;s "Maraca" Cuban. Caribe Fnsembie South Coast Singers Liz Roper of. the Desert Sands School D.strict office informed me the above mentioned dates are available -'to us (both in the Middle Schao3 Amphitheatre and/or aud.itorium,) with fees covered by Coast Concert Management. With this understanding, we are firm on all counts. Thank you fc.- your patience and cooperation. J.� 49994 El Ciarculo . La Quint&, CA 92253 33 Coo! Brooke Irvine, CA 92612 (760) 564-2111 FA X &: P h o n e # (949) 854-33 a 4 Is �fi BUSINESS SESSION ITEM: ORDINANCE NO. 369 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY LA QUINTA AMENDING SECTION 12.32.120 OF THE LA QUINTA CHARTER AND MUNICIPAL CODE EXEMPTING CERTAIN COMMERCIAL VEHICLES FROM PARKING RESTRICTIONS WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to maintain the residential and neighborhood atmosphere within the community; and WHEREAS, the parking of large commercial vehicles in the community is a detriment to that end; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that certain commercial vehicles because of their size and type are consistent with the residential atmosphere and should be exempt from specified parking restrictions; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, does hereby amend Section 12.32.120 . of the La Quinta Charter and Municipal Code to read as follows: 12.32.120 Commercial Vehicles exempted from Section 12.32.110. The following commercial vehicles are exempted from the prohibition contained in Section 12.32.1 10: A. Pickup trucks and utility vans each of which do not exceed eight feet in height or twenty feet in combined total length. B. All vehicles while being used in actual construction work on a permit - approved construction site; C. All vehicles in the process of making a pickup or delivery; and D. Governmental and public utility emergency service vehicles. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council, held on this 16th day of April, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 18Oro, Ordinance No. 369 Parking Commercial Vehicles M.C. Chapter 12 § 12.32.120 April 16, 2002 Page 2 JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: 15 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA March 12, 2002 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:04 p.m. by Chairman Abels who asked Commissioner Butler to lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Richard Butler, Tom Kirk, Steve Robbins, Robert Tyler, and Chairman Jacques Abels. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez, Senior Engineer Steve Speer, Planning Consultant Nicole Criste, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Chairman Abels asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of February 26, 2002. Commissioner Tyler asked that Page 5, Item #13 be corrected to read, "...to express our concerns..."; Page 6, Item # 13, "It is her belief..." and delete one of the "...she would.." There being no further corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Robbins to approve the minutes as corrected. Unanimously approved. B. Chairman Abels asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of February 27, 2002. There being no corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to approve the minutes as submitted. Unanimously approved. C. Department Report: None V. PRESENTATIONS: None. i-x G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\3-12-02.wpd 1 Planning Commission Minutes March 12, 2002 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Site Development Permit 2001-729; a request of Michael Shovlin for Ross Dress for Less for review of development plans for a 30,187 square foot commercial building to be located on the north side of Highway 1 1 1, east of Washington Street within the One Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Kirk asked about the Santa Fe element above the sign. Staff stated they were outriggers and were used on other buildings in the Center. 1 4. Commissioner Butler asked that staff include the Architecture and Landscaping Review Commission recommendations. 5. Commissioner Tyler stated he would prefer to see a picture of the entire Center and how this fits in with the adjacent existing buildings, rather than by itself. He questioned why staff was limiting the number of columns to be landscaped and if the sign met the sign program. Staff noted they thought four planters would be adequate, but there is no reason not to have more. In regard to the larger sign, it could be granted by the Commission. The Commission has normally approved corporate signage and they have been larger than what the sign program allows. 6. Commissioner Kirk asked if this was larger than what the sign program allowed. Staff stated the in -line shops were allowed 2/3 the width of the frontage and 24-inches high for signage and this sign was larger. Each of the major users have been submitting their signage separately. Commissioner Kirk stated he thought the sign looked appropriate for the size of the building, but he would like to know what had been previously approved. 7. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Dave Smalley, representing the One Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center, gave a presentation on the proposal. He stated the landscaping is not a problem and will be submitted at a later date. In terms of this building in relationship to the othe 402 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\3-12-02.wpd 2 Planning Commission Minutes March 12, 2002 buildings, the elevation has the same column/arcade frontage as the proposed Staples building next door. On the rear elevation, he would like to point out this is the truck loading area and they would prefer not to enhance this area. They have architecturally broken up the elements to add detail and they are concerned about adding costs unnecessarily. 8. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Tyler questioned the height of the arch over the entrance as being 6.5 feet higher than the entrance to Staples. Mr. Smalley stated Staples has a curved arch to bring a variety to the architecture. 9. Commissioner Butler asked why the applicant did not want to use light scones on the rear of the building. Mr. Smalley stated it is an accent color and would not have a problem adding it to this building. There problem was the request by staff to pop the building out. 10. Commissioner Robbins stated the overhang appears to project out in front of the Staples building. Mr. Smalley stated the curb does protrude out about five feet, but the columns should align. 11. There being no further public participation, the public comment portion of the public hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 12. Commissioner Robbins stated he liked the rear of the Staples building and with the tile accents it would be more appropriate. 13. Commissioner Kirk supported staff's recommendation and the project. 14. Commissioner Tyler stated the rear landscaping is on the north of the alleyway and does not do much to hide the rear of the building. 15. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-033 approving Site Development Permit 2001-729, subject to the findings and conditions as amended: 180 (03 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\3-12-02.wpd 3 Planning Commission Minutes March 12, 2002 A. Condition #28: The plans shall provide for pocket planters around all the columns at the front of the building. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. B. Zoning Code Amendment 2002-071; a request of the City for review of an Amendment to Chapters 9.220, 9.230, and 9.240 of the La Quinta Municipal Code amending procedures for Zone Changes and Code Amendments, General Plan Amendments, and Specific Plans; and review of an addition of Section 9.140.070 Low Density/Agricultural-Equestrian Residential District 1 . Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Kirk asked staff for clarification as to why there is a distinction between a the Council and Commission's action in regard to a "majority vote." Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez stated it should state a majority vote of the Council, or Commission; staff will strike "majority vote" from the text. 3. Commissioner Kirk asked if the Transfer of Development Rights has ever been used. Staff stated yes, for hillside property. Commissioner Kirk asked if it had been a transfer between properties. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated a person had purchased the Transfer Development Rights from a parcel of land. They still have them as they have not been used to date. It did preserve the hillside in perpetuity. 4. Commissioner Robbins asked that the language in Section 9.220.020.0 be cleaned up to read correctly. He asked if a farming operation would be required to file a dust control plan. Staff stated it would be corrected to not require it for farming operations. 5. Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment on this item. Mrs. Gayle Cady, 82-831 Avenue 54, Vista Santa Rosa area, asked for clarification on the new ordinance in regard to whether or not there is a new Agricultural/Equestrian Zonin 1 9 004 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\3-12-02.wpd 4 Planning Commission Minutes March 12, 2002 Ordinance or is there going to be an Agricultural Overlay District. Second, is a private ranch responsible for providing a program for the maintenance of manure. In regard to housing density, is there a number of residences to be allowed per acre. She would suggest one unit per five acres. Staff stated that in regard to the overlay versus district, this is to be a District in the Code. In regard to the manure management plan it is listed for nonresidential use, so a private ranch would not be subject to the standards. The Low Density Residential (4 units to the acre) does apply here if it is to be developed into a single family residential component with a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. 6. Commissioner Kirk asked what the current allowed density is now. Staff stated the minimum lot size under the County zoning is 20,000 square feet. Ms. Cady stated it would be impossible to continue with the rural ambience of the area if this were allowed. She is asking that in the agricultural and equestrian area there be larger lot sizes than the 10,000 square feet. 7. Ms. Betty Magnum -Smith, 82-470 Avenue 54, Vista Santa Rosa, questioned the setbacks for the accessory buildings. She asked that those who have existing accessory buildings, be grandfathered. Staff noted they are. Ms. Magnum -Smith asked how many dogs would be allowed. Staff stated currently under the County zoning, any person with 5-10 dogs would be considered a kennel and a permit would be required. The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code has a requirement that more than five dogs is considered to be a kennel and a license would be required. The setbacks under the County are more restrictive than what is proposed. Ms. Magnum -Smith concurred with reducing the density. 8. Ms. Susan Hale, 83-230 Avenue 52, stated that in the polo world they need more than five horses per acre. For caretaker housing, a 1000 square feet is a very small house. 9. Mr. Lee Anderson, 59-777 Calhoun Street, Vista Santa Rosa, stated he was involved in agriculture and farm animals. In regard to the raising and breeding of sheep they are mentioned in both categories and he questioned which was correct. In regard to the spreading of manure and dust control, he requests it not be required by the agriculture users. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\3-12-02.wpd 5 0050, Planning Commission Minutes March 12, 2002 10. There being no further public participation, the public comment portion of the public hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 11. Commissioner Tyler suggested a lower density be considered for this area. 12. Commissioner Butler asked if the residential development standards only apply if someone wanted to develop their property. Staff stated yes. Commissioner Butler asked if the manure plan applied here. Staff stated it was for a commercial stable. Commissioner Butler asked if a property owner was boarding only one or two horses would they have to comply with this. Staff stated at that point it is a commercial stable, yes they would. 13. Commissioner Kirk stated the density issue is a major issue and we are proposing to double the density for this area. He asked if the minimums were left as they currently are to allow for the density that is suggested in the General Plan, but require to achieve that density they would have to acquire Transfer of Development Rights (TDR). If you do not acquire TDRs from some other property, the minimum stays as it is today, 20,000 square feet, maintaining the current density allowed under the County, and you could double that density by acquiring TDRs. This would be consistent with the General Plan, maintain the way of life as it is under the current Zoning Code, and create a market for TDRs. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste stated that if the underlying density is two units to the acre under the Zoning District, and the only way to achieve four units to the acre is by buying TDRs, then this is not consistent with the General Plan. It is not possible to be consistent with the General Plan without doing something else. Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez stated that to the extent you are relying on a third party sales transaction to essentially make the zoning consistent with the General Plan, would be questionable. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the purpose is that if someone owns ten acres and they want to maintain their lifestyle, they can sell their density to a developer who wants to develop and they can have their lifestyle in perpetuity. Commissioner Kirk stated he did not see much a a demand for the TDR. 18;) 0006 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\3-12-02.wpd 6 Planning Commission Minutes March 12, 2002 14. Commissioner Tyler stated this is a valid concern for the residents in this area. If they own a ten acre parcel and he decides to sell it to another who wants to keep it as a ten acre parcel, can they do this. Staff stated they could. This is why this district is being created to allow the uses to remain forever. They have a choice; it can be agricultural, equestrian, or it can be subdivided and developed. 15. Commissioner Robbins stated the concern is not that they would sell their property, but that if they own a parcel with one unit on it today, the neighbor may sell their parcel and it would be developed with 40 units. 16. Commissioner Tyler stated that if other restrictions are placed on the property, then the neighbor has restrictions which limits his ability to maximize his gain. 17. Commissioner Robbins stated this is why it cannot be down zoned. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste stated that currently under the County zoning, the A-1 designation allows planned unit development in golf courses. Without a change in zone, under the County standards there could be a golf club very similar to anyone currently in the City, in any of the A-1 areas tomorrow. Generally, that kind of development because of the transfer of density that occurs between a golf course and the residential portion, runs somewhere between two, two and a half units to the acre. She went on to give an example. The zoning designations are up to the maximum of four units to the acre, and as Commissioner Kirk stated generally we seem to be seeing projects that are under the maximum, rather than pushing the maximum. 18. Commissioner Robbins stated that if the County density was two units per acre, the City should not go lower. He asked staff to elaborate on the size of the caretakers unit. Staff stated it does not affect an existing house. Commissioner Robbins stated that if a property owner boards one horse they should not be subject to the manure plan. 19. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-034, recommending approval of Zoning Code Amendment 2002-071, as amended: A. Section 9.220.010.0 amend by deleting "by a majority 007 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\3-12-02.wpd 7 Planning Commission Minutes March 12, 2002 vote." B. Section 9.220.020.0 and 9.230.010.C. Delete "may recommend that the City Council initiate a Code Amendment/General Plan Amendment." C. Exhibit B: Equestrian and Agricultural Uses, Delete the first reference to sheep and goats under the section that reads, "The grazing and breeding of cattle, horses, llamas and other farm animals...." D. Under Development Standards delete Sections B.4 and 8. E. Under Definitions, add to "commercial stable" "...the stabling of more than five horses not owned by the residence of the property...." ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. VII. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Sign Application 2002-609; a request of Coronel Enterprises/Sign-A- Rama for review of a planned sign program for 51-105 Avenida Villa (Durango Building) located on the west side of Avenida Villa, north of Avenida Montezuma. 1. Chairman Abels asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Wally Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. There being no further public comment, the public participation portion was closed and open for Commission discussion. 3. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to adopt Minute Motion 2002-006 approving Sign Application 2002-609, as recommended. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. IX. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: D. Commissioner Tyler gave a report on the City Council meeting of February 19, 2002. X. ADJOURNMENT: 008 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\3-12-02.wpd 8 Planning Commission Minutes March 12, 2002 There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Kirk to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held March 26, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 8:35 p.m. on March 12, 2002. Respectfully submitted, e S wyer, Exe utive Secretary City a Quinta, California 009 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\3-12-02.wpd 9 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: I (P — MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA March 13, 2002 I. CALL TO ORDER 10:00 a.m. A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Committee was called to order at 1:09 p.m. by Principal Planner Fred Baker who led the flag salute. B. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt, Dennis Cunningham and David Thorns. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, Management Analyst Debbie Power, Principal Planner Fred Baker, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Principal Planner Fred Baker asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of February 13, 2002. Commissioner. There being no further corrections, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Thoms to approve the Minutes as submitted. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Commercial Property Improvement Program; a request of La Quinta Palms Realty, Bruce Cathcart/Jim Cathcart for a funding request for exterior improvements for the property located on the west side of Eisenhower Drive at the Terminus of Calle Tampico (51-001 Eisenhower Drive. 1. Management Analyst Debbie Powel presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Thoms questioned the air conditioning ducts. 1 GAWPD0CS\ARLC\3-13-02.wpd 1 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes March 13, 2002 Mr. Jim Cathcart explained the location of the ducts and work to be done. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if the ducting were removed would the exposed stucco be repainted. Mr. Cathcart stated yes, but it is not part of the funding request. 4. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if there was any limit as to how many times an applicant can apply for the funding. Staff stated only once a year, but as many times as there are funds. 5. Committee Member Cunningham stated the duct work is the area of concern from the public view, but the replacement of the duct is not $2,600. The cost involved is the replacement of the entire system to replace the duct. The question is how far does the City want to go to get rid of the duct. In essence, the City is paying $2,682 to get rid of the duct eyesore. Mr. Cathcart explained the request was based on comments made by members of the City Council and Historical Society members. Discussion followed as regarding the request. 6. Committee Member Bobbitt stated it was border line as to whether or not the City should pay for this, but he has no problem with the request. 7. There being no discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Thorns to adopt Minute Motion 2002-009 approving Commercial Property Improvement Program request of La Quinta Palms Realty with a score of 81. Unanimously approved. B. Site Development Permit 2001-730; a request of Clubhouse Associates, LLC for review of building elevations and landscaping plans for the Clubhouse Apartments to be located on the south side of Avenue 52, east of Jefferson Street. 1. Principal Planner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Mr. Bob Kraft, representing the applicant, gave a presentation on the project. 10 3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked staff what the height limit wa� G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\3-13-02.wpd 2 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes March 13, 2002 for commercial buildings. Staff noted it was 36-feet. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the coordination of the shared access. Mr. Chuck Cockrell, Project Manager, stated they worked with the City on the shared access. They have a left in, with right in and out only. Their concern is the truck deliveries for the commercial project at the corner and the traffic patterns. To resolve the issue they decided to have a stacking element for three cars. If this project is constructed before the commercial project an agreement will be made between the two to meet the conditions for the commercial project to reimburse them for the payments. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the use of wood on some of the elements. Mr. Kraft stated they will be blocked as designed to be constructed to keep them from turning. Committee Member Bobbitt asked about the wood doors and the use of the date palm trees in a high traffic areas. He asked how the residents at Country Club of the Desert would be impacted by the height of the apartment buildings at the 40-feet. Mr. Kraft showed a site elevation. Committee Member Bobbitt stated his concern in light of the problems that were created with the height of the berm is the height of the buildings. 4. Committee Member Cunningham stated it is a situation of who is there first. This backs up to the Canal and with the parking it has a buffer, but you will never be able to hide it. 5. Staff noted a different material would be used on the carports and asked the Committee's opinion. Mr. Kraft gave a presentation on the material. 6. Committee Member Cunningham stated the material gives a lot of design freedom and are great. He likes the shade structures. Mr. Kraft stated that from a design standard it offers a lot more than the wood. Committee Member Cunningham stated he liked the architecture. A big issue with apartments is the maintenance over a period of years. In regard to the wood siding, he would prefer a painted metal. They will be using clay tiles instead of concrete which are better and richer. The white on the color board should be replaced on the stucco. He questioned whether or not the small tiles on the dome would pop off due to the earthquakes. He would recommend a different material. The windows are all setback giving a shadow line that will enhance the building. In regard to the carports, the fabric covers do look good, but a sand color should be used. In regard to the wood, whether or not you o - block them they will turn. Metal may be a consideration. He �' 0 k) asked the location of the trash enclosures and that they be "bulle0 0 3 G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\3-13-02.wpd 3 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes March 13, 2002 proof". 7. Committee Member Thoms asked what type of fencing would be used along the property line that backs up to the All American Canal. Mr. Kraft stated they would prefer to use the chainlink fence that is installed by CVWD and they would be asking them to put it on the property line, not where it is now. They hope to make it into a living fence. Committee Member Thoms asked about the area between the carports and fence on the west of south side, as they are difficult to landscape. The important item is to give attention to will be the fence. Plant material on the barrier itself. He asked for an explanation on the security wall on Avenue 52. Mr. Ronald Masanobu Izumita, Image Design, stated they have a requirement to provide a five foot high sound barrier wall. Committee Member Thoms stated he liked the site plan, architecture, and carports. He is concerned about the landscaping on Avenue 52. There is an exposed parking lot and he would like to see more screening for the car noses. Mr. Izumita stated it will be bermed with meandering sidewalks with a lot of ground cover. 8. Committee Member Bobbitt asked that the plant pallette be similar to the adjacent shopping center. 9. Committee Member Thoms asked if the wall facing the north side will have plant material. Mr. Izumita stated there would be plant material on certain locations. Committee Member Thoms asked what "'I 5-feet BTH" meant. Staff stated at means "brown trunk height". Committee Member Thoms asked that the Queen Palm not be used in an row situation. 10. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2002-010 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-730, subject to the conditions as submitted and amended: A. Landscaping along the perimeter, around the parking lot not to use plant material on the ground, but use vines on the wall or living fence. B. Avenue 52 a three foot berm is required to screen the parking lot. C. Queen Palms not be planted in an organized pattern. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None 004 GAWPD0CS\ARLC\3-13-02.wpd 4 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes March 13, 2002 VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None Vill. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on April 3, 2002. This meeting was adjourned at 2:25 p.m. on March 13, 2002. Respectfully submitted, ,- 10a rTAWYER, Executive Secretary City Quinta, California 005 G:\WPDOCSURLC\3-13-02.wpd 5 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: 11 MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA January 31, 2002 This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by Chairman Maria Puente at 3:00 p.m. who led the flag salute and asked for the roll call. I. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call. Present: Commissioners Mitchell, Sharp, Wright, and Chairman Puente. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Sharp to excuse Commissioner Irwin. Unanimously approved. Staff Present: Planning Manager Christine di lorio, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Secretary Carolyn Walker. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Sharp to approve the Minutes of December 20, 2001 with the following changes: V. Business Items, Item B be corrected to read: Section 3: "Commissioner Mitchell stated the Paleontology was performed too often to areas which potentially would yield the same paleontological resources. He then asked why the City was requiring so much paleontology." Section 4: "Planning Manager di lorio responded that the City had a Paleontological Plan which recognized certain research design questions that needed additional clarification. The updated General Plan would address Commissioner Mitchell's concern." Unanimously approved. 19 PACAROLYMHPC 1-31-02.wpd - j - Historic Preservation Commission Minutes January 31, 2002 V. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Results of Phase II Testing of two Prehistoric Sites within the Grove/Mountain View Country Club for Specific Plan 90 016; a request for approval of testing results. Applicant: Toll Brothers - Historic Consultant: LSA 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Commissioners concurred with staff's recommendations. 3. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Mitchell/Wright to adopt Minute Motion 2002-001 recommending approval of the Results of Phase II Testing of two Prehistoric Sites within the Grove/Mountain View Country Club for Specific Plan 90-016, Amendment #1. Unanimously approved. B. Determination of consistency with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties for the two story detached addition and rehabilitation of the historic City of, La Quinta Historic Society Museum; Applicant: City of La Quinta - Historic Architect: Ferris, Johnson and Associates. 1. Planning Manager Christine di lorio introduced Mr. Paul Johnson of the firm Ferris, Johnson and Associates, the architects for the project. She then presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Commissioner Sharp asked questions about when the balcony would be built and the future expansion. Staff replied the entire structure would be built at once, with a use designation applied to the area noted as "future expansion". Staff also stated the stained glass windows salvaged from the Desert Club would be integrated into the tower element at the Museum. The City was unable to integrate the Desert Club doors into the project, as they were in an unuseable condition. 3. Commissioner Wright asked if Commissioner Irwin had been able 19J PACAROLYN\HPC1-31-02.wpd -2- O O 2 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes January 31, 2002 to review the plans, and if she had made any comments. Staff replied Commissioner Irwin had been involved when the City Council was reviewing the documents during a Study Session. 4. Engineering Consultant Nick Nickerson stated Commissioner Irwin made favorable comments during the Study Session. 5. Commissioner Wright asked if any comments had been made concerning the existing tower and the new roof lines. Staff replied nothing would be attached to the tower. The present Museum building would be free-standing and the roof lines shown on the plans were not attached to the Museum. 6. Commissioner Wright asked if the plans are two dimensional. Mr. Paul Johnson replied the Museum was drawn in front of the new building behind it, with nothing attached to the Museum. Planning Manager di lorio stated there was a courtyard separating the two. 7. Commissioner Sharp asked about the proximity of the veterinarian office. Staff replied there is a five foot setback to the property line and a six foot wall separating the veterinary office from the Museum. 8. Commissioner Mitchell asked if the color palette had been determined as he would not like to requested that no light green be used. Staff replied the colors had not been determined yet. 9. Commissioner Wright asked about the parking. Staff replied there was one area closed off to vehicular traffic which would be used for parking as well as parking in front of the Museum and to the north abutting the Frances Hack Park. 10. Commissioner Wright stated he had no problems with the plans if Commissioner Irwin was in favor of them. His only concern was that the integrity of the original structure not be compromised. 11. Commissioner Sharp commented the tower finial need to be repaired as it was composed of a ball and spike and the spike was bent. 12. Chairman Puente asked what the primary consideration was on exterior decoration. Staff replied there was a comment included �1 about the the which appeared to be a later addition. 003 P:\CAROLYN\HPC1-31-02.wpd -3 - Historic Preservation Commission Minutes January 31, 2002 13. Commissioner Sharp commented that they may have been the tiles he helped put up about eight years ago. 14. Staff asked if the tiles were existing or were they duplicated. Commissioner Sharp replied they took one of the existing tiles and found duplicates at a tile store. 15. Engineering Consultant Nick Nickerson stated the tiles around the door were just glued on. Normally tiles are an integral part of the stucco surrounding it, but these tiles had no grout, they were just glued on. The tiles around the door had gaps where they were just touching the corners and were clearly an add on to the building. 16. Planning Manager di lorio stated staff included this information to make the Commission aware of the tiles. 17. Commissioner Mitchell asked a question about initiating Section 106 Consultation in regards to this proposal. Staff replied this was not needed as there was no Federal money being used in this project. 18. There being no further discussion it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Mitchell to adopt Minute Motion 2002-002 recommending approval of the determination of consistency with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties for the two story detached addition and rehabilitation of the historic City of La Quinta Historic Society Museum; located in the Village at La Quinta. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS A. Planning Manager di lorio announced her resignation from the City of La Quinta and her new position as the Director of Planning and Building for the City of Carmel -by -the -Sea. The Commissioners congratulated her and Commissioner Wright suggested the Commission do something special, such as a plaque thanking her for all the help she has given them. Staff stated they would look into it. 004 2 -1 .- P:\CAR0LYN\HPC1-31-02.wpd -4- Historic Preservation Commission Minutes January 31, 2002 VIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Sharp to adjourn this meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission to the next regularly scheduled meeting to be held on February 21, 2002. This meeting of the Historical Preservation Commission was adjourned at 3:25 p.m. Unanimously approved. Submitted by: Caroly alker Secretary 003, PACAROLYNWPC 1-31-02.wpd -5- MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA February 21, 2002 This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by Chairman Maria Puente at 3:04 p.m. who led the flag salute and asked for the roll call. I. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call. Present: Commissioners Mitchell, Sharp, Wright, and Chairman Puente. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Sharp to excuse Commissioner Irwin. Unanimously approved. Staff Present: Principal Planner Fred Baker, and Secretary Carolyn Walker. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Sharp to approve the Minutes of January 31, 2002 as submitted. Unanimously approved. V. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Phase I Archaeological Survey Report for the Clubhouse at La Quinta Study Area. Applicant: Mr. Charles Crookall for Clubhouse Associates - Historic Consultant: W & S Consultants. 1. Principal Planner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Commissioner Mitchell concurred with staff's recommendations. 26) PACAR0LYN\HPC2-21-02. wpd - j - Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 21, 2002 3. Commissioner Wright stated he had no problem as long as Phase II will be completed. 4. Commissioner Sharp had a question about what was being built the site. Staff replied it would be an apartment complex called The Clubhouse". 5. Commissioner Wright asked if it was going to be single or multi- level. Staff replied it would be a variety of one, two and three levels with carports and garages. 6. Commissioner Sharp asked how many apartments would be built. Staff replied 149 units. 7. Commissioner Sharp commented it seemed to be a large development for the area. Staff replied it was and would require a General Plan Amendment. 8. Chairman Puente agreed with staff's recommendations. 9. Commissioner Wright asked the applicant, Charles Crookall, if he had any comments. 10. Mr. Charles Crookall replied they had hired CRM TECH to conduct the Phase II Study. CRM Tech had already submitted a research design, and had completed all the physical work on site. It was his understanding they were currently working on the Phase II Report, and may be completed by the next Historic Preservation Commission meeting. 1 1. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2002-003 recommending approval of the results of the Phase I Archaeological Survey Report for "The Clubhouse" at La Quinta study area. Unanimously approved. B. Commemorative Plague for Burkett Ranch; Applicant: Mr. Colin McDermott - Architect: Prest Vuksic Architects, Inc. 1. Principal Planner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2 0 �r PACAROLYN\HPC2-21-02.wpd -2- 002 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 21, 2002 2. Commissioner Mitchell stated he had no issues with the content. 3. Commissioner Sharp had a question of whether the plaque was to be placed at the driveway or walkway entrance to the bank. Staff replied it was a walkway. 4. Chairman Puente asked if Commissioner Irwin had given staff any comments. 5. Commissioner Wright commented Commissioner Irwin would have no problem with this project. She supported the placement of plaques throughout the City for historic sites and would be in favor of this plan. 6. There being no further discussion it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2002-004 recommending approval of the Commemorative Plaque with the recommended corrections. Applicant: Mr. Colin McDermott - Architect: Prest Vuksic Architects, Inc. Unanimously approved. C. Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report for the Proposed Fire Station Site on the west side of Adams Street north of Miles Avenue; Applicant: City of La Quinta - Archaeological Consultant: CRM TECH (Bruce Love, Principal). 1. Principal Planner Fred Baker introduced Nicole Criste, the Consulting Planner who prepared the report. She presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Commissioners Mitchell and Wright supported staff's recommendations. 3. Commissioner Sharp asked about the size of the project property. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste replied the northeast Fire Station site was 1.4 acres, but the whole area had been surveyed because of the need to move dirt from the Fire Station site to the intervening area. 4. Commissioner Sharp asked about the size of the building. Staff replied it would be 7,800 square feet and would hold two large fire trucks and a medical unit. 003 PACAROLYN\HPC2-21-02. wpd -3- Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 21, 2002 5. Commissioner Sharp asked about the architectural style. Staff replied the style recommended by the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee favored split -face veneer on the wainscoting with a reddish -brown colored tile roof. 6. Chairman Puente supported staff's recommendations. 7. There being no further discussion it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2002-005 recommending approval of the Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report for the Proposed Northeast Fire Station Site on the west side of Adams Street north of Miles Avenue. Applicant: City of La Quinta - Archaeological Consultant: CRM TECH (Bruce Love, Principal). Unanimously approved. D. Cultural Resources Element of the General Plan: a request of the City for review. Applicant: City of La Quinta - Archaeological Consultant: CRM TECH. 1. Principal Planner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Consulting Planner Nicole Criste stated the principal goals were listed in the policy document. A series of policies and programs implementing those goals and the necessary documents had been drafted. Bruce Love and Tom Tang, of CRM TECH were required to participate in the writing of the elements in order to meet the requirements for a Certified Local Government for both the archaeological and historical issues. 3. Commissioner Mitchell stated he had only one comment regarding the last sentence on page 128 which stated: "nor has the City established the mechanisms to incorporate the historic preservation concerns into its Zoning Ordinance" He was unclear as to whether this statement reflected the procedures currently established for the Commission and asked staff to clarify. Staff replied there was no reference to Cultural Resources in the Zoning Ordinance. The City would have the ability to address these issues once this Report was adopted. V n04 PACAR0LYN\HPC2-21-02. wpd -4- Historic Preservation Commission Minutes February 21, 2002 0 4 Commissioners Wright and Sharp agreed with staff's recommendations. Chairman Puente supported staff's recommendations. 6. There being no further discussion it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Mitchell/Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2002-006 recommending acceptance of the Cultural Resources Element of the General Plan establishing policies and programs for the City. Applicant: City of La Quinta - Archaeological Consultant: CRM TECH. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS A. Commissioners discussed the 271h Annual California 2002 Preservation Conference and decided each would give their reply at the next regularly scheduled meeting. VIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Mitchell/Sharp to adjourn this meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission to the next regularly scheduled meeting to be held on March 21, 2002. This meeting of the Historical Preservation Commission was adjourned at 3:25 p.m. Unanimously approved. Submitted by: Carolyn 4,a Iker Secretary -5- MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA March 21, 2002 This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by Chairman Maria Puente at 3:02 p.m. who led the flag salute and asked for the roll call. I. CALL TO ORDER IV. V. A. Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call. Present: Commissioners Irwin, Mitchell, Sharp, Wright, and Chairman Puente. Staff Present: Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Secretary Carolyn Walker. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Mitchell to approve the Minutes of February 21, 2002 as submitted. Commissioners approved with Commission Irwin abstaining. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Certificate of Appropriateness 2002-015 (City's Commercial Property Improvement Program 2002-015) • a review of proposed property improvements at 51-650 Avenida Bermudas, located on east side of Avenida Bermudas north of Calle Amigo. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa introduced Debbie Powell Management Analyst, who presented information on Commercial Property Improvement Program 2002-015. PACAR0LYN\HPC3-21-02. wpd 203 t��Sj Historic Preservation Commission Minutes March 21, 2002 2. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the balance of the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3. Commissioner Mitchell concurred with staff's recommendations. 4. Commissioner Wright stated the Commission should require strict adherence to the City's Historical Guidelines as they did for the Tradition, the veterinary clinic, and Hacienda del Gato. 5. Commissioner Irwin agreed the veterinary clinic was a good example of what could be done with older, historic buildings, and asked that it continue to be the precedent. 6. Commissioner Sharp questioned what was meant by "original condition" of the building as far as architectural style. Specifically, was this going to be done in a Spanish Hacienda kind of look with a red tile roof on it. 7. Applicant Lori Abdelnour was introduced and stated the building would not be remodeled in the Spanish style, but would be restored to the original architectural style. 8. Commissioner Sharp stated he thought the style was a type of International Bauhaus and asked if the fenestration would remain the same. Applicant replied building would be restored to what was there originally including the paint color. 9. Commissioner Wright asked if the applicant, or the Museum had any historic photographs of the building. Applicant and Commissioner Irwin replied they did not. 10. Commissioner Sharp asked if the roof tiles were asphalt. Applicant replied no, they were concrete. 1 1. Commissioner Sharp asked if the door was going to be replaced. Applicant replied the door had been broken and cracked so many times it would have to be replaced with a custom made beveled glass door due to its unconventional size. P:\CAROLYN\HPC3-21-02.wpd -2- oc�z Historic Preservation Commission Minutes March 21, 2002 12. Commissioner Sharp stated he wanted to make sure the remodeling would be kept in the style of the building. Applicant replied it would. 13. Chairman Puente agreed with staff's recommendations. 14. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Sharp/Mitchell to adopt Minute Motion 2002-007 recommending approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness 2002-015 (City's Commercial Property Improvement Program 2002-015). Unanimously approved. B. Phase I Archaeological Study for Proposed Senior Housing Project Site a request for approval of the Cultural Resources Assessment and application for construction of a senior housing apartment project to be located at the southwest corner of Avenue 47 and Adams Street. Applicant: Southern California Presbyterian Homes Archaeological Consultant: Historical, _Environmental, _Environmental, Archaeological, Research, Team (H.E.A.R.T.) 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Staff introduced Ben Beckler from Southern California Presbyterian Homes. 3. Commissioner Mitchell asked that the pottery type be identified in the report, as well as the initiation of the subsurface probing testing. 4. Commissioner Wright concurred with Commissioner Mitchell's recommendations. 5. Commissioner Irwin stated she wanted to see a Phase II as well as monitoring during trenching beyond Phase II. 6. Commissioner Sharp agreed with the previous Commissioner comments. He added it is a sensitive area and needed to be checked very thoroughly. PACAROLYN\HPC3-21-02. wpd -3- - i.J 003 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes March 21, 2002 7. There being no further discussion it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Sharp to adopt Minute Motion 2002-008 approving the Phase I Archaeological Study for Proposed Senior Housing Project Site at the southwest corner of Avenue 47 and Adams Street with the following recommendations: A. Monitoring shall be done during any trenching activities. B. All items of pottery shall be identified. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS A. Commissioners discussed travel and scheduling arrangements for the 27th Annual California 2002 Preservation Conference. VIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Mitchell to adjourn this meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission to the next regularly scheduled meeting to be held on April 18, 2002. This meeting of the Historical Preservation Commission was adjourned at 3:29 p.m. Unanimously approved. Submitted by: �l q/ 4 // � Carolyn 4 lker Secretary 211 PACAR0LYN\1iPC3-21-02.wpd -4- 004 DEPARTMENT REPORT: Z ` A APRIL 25 APRIL 25-27 MAY 7 MAY 21 JUNE 4 JUNE 18 JULY 2 JULY 16 AUGUST 6 AUGUST 20 CITY COUNCIL'S UPCOMING EVENTS CHAMBER MIXER - CITY HALL COURTYARD 20TM ANNIVERSARY EVENTS (see attached) CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING 20" ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION UPCOMING EVENTS 3; �o x APRIL 25 CHAMBER MIXER - CITY HALL (5:30 - 7:30 P.M.) APRIL 26 MULTI -GENERATIONAL TALENT SHOW - LA QUINTA SENIOR CENTER (7:00 P.M.) APRIL 27 COMMUNITY PARADE - FRITZ BURNS COMMUNITY PARK 00:00 A.M.) COMMUNITY PICNIC - FRITZ BURNS COMMUNITY PARK 01:00 A.M.) ARTS & CRAFTS SHOW - LA QUINTA SENIOR CENTER 0:00 - 4:00 P.M.) COVE OASIS TRAIL HIKE - COVE OASIS (5:30 P.M.) STAR -GAZING - COVE OASIS (7:30 P.M.) FISHING DERBY - LAKE CAHUILLA 00:00 P.M. - 10:00 A.M.) APRIL 28 GEM OF THE DESERT RUN - FRITZ BURNS COMMUNITY PARK (7:00 A.M.) ART UNDER THE UMBRELLAS - LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION 00:00 A.M. - 4:00 P.M.) ENTERTAINMENT WITH FIREWORKS - LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL (5:30 P.M.) 21 April 2002 Monthly Planner ITI rOTIT .440 WTP ;Rs F .. 1 2 3 4 5 ..q I.. 6, 2:00 PM City 10:00 AM ALRC Council Meeting 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 L'NA 10:00 AM Public Safety -Perkins 7:00 PM C.V. Mosquito Abate. 9:00 AM RCTC- Pena 7:00 PM Cultural 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins 5:30 PM Invest - Arts Commission Daylight Savings -Perkins 7:00 PM Planning ment Advisory Time 6:00 PM League Commission Board of Cities-Riv.Div. Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission 18 19 20 14 15 6 0 AM CVB- enderson T2:00 F17- 1 1:30 AM Energy/ PM City Envi-Sniff 3:00 PM Historic Council Meeting Preservation 24 Commission 25 26 27 21 22 23 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM LAFCO- Commission Human/Comm- Henderson Meeting Adolph 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson t nniversary vents 28 29 30 6:00 PM CVAG- Exec Com-Pena �� March" MW S MT W T F S S MT T F S 3 4 5 10 11 12 6 7 8 9 13 14 15 16 5 1 2 3 4y 6 7 8 9 10 11 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 12 13 14 15 16 17 18, 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 19 20 21 22 23 24 2531 26 27 28 29 30 31' C a Creator Plus on 4/12/2002W 2 1 ,s Printed by Calendar May 2002 Monthly Planner 1 2 3 April June 10:00 AM ALRC 12:00 PM Mayors S MT W T F S S M T W T F S Lunch 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4t 14 15 16 17 18 21 19 20 9 16 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 Happy Birthday 22 23 24 25 26 27 24 25 26 27 28 29 28 29 30 30 La Quinta 5 6 7 8 ) 10 2:00 PM City 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM Energy/ Council Meeting Pena Envi-Sniff 5:30 PM Invest- 7:00 PM Cultural ment Advisory Arts Commission Board 12 13 14 15 10:00 AM Public Safety -Perkins 7:00 PM C.V. Mosquito Abate. Mother's Day 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins 6:00 PM League -Perkins 7:00 PM Planning Commission of Cities-Riv.Div. Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission LJ I,1 26 16 17 3:00 PM Historic Preservation Commission 20 21 22 23 24 9:00 AM CVB- 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM LAFCO- Henderson Human/Comm- Henderson 2:00 PM City Adolph Council Meeting 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson 27 28 2 IL 7:00 PM Planning Commission Meeting Memorial Day (City Hall Closed) En 1 :A 25 r-rinteu oy t,aienuar creator Plus on 4/12/2002 21 June 2002 Monthly Planner WE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 10:00 AM Public Safety -Perkins 7:00 PM C.V. Mosquito Abate. 9:00 AM RCTC- Pena 12:00 PM Energy/ Envi-Sniff 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins -Perkins 7:00 PM Planning 5:30 PM Invest- ment Advisory 7:00 PM Cultural Arts Commission 6:00 PM League of Cities-Riv.Div. Commission Meeting Board Flag Day 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ,;.:;: 9:00 AM CVB- Henderson 3:00 PM Historic Father's Day 2:00 PM City Council Meeting Preservation Commission 1 st Day of Summer 23 24 25 26 27 28 2�' 6:00 PM CVAG- Exec Com-Pena 7:00 PM Planning Commission 12:00 PM CVAG Human/Comm- 9:00 A - HendersonFCO Meeting Adolph 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson may S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 4/12/2002 0� �O • t 4 c� OF TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tom Hartung, Director of Building & Safety I. " DATE: April 16, 2002 RE: Monthly Department Report - March 2002 Attached please find the statistical summaries for building permits, Animal Control, Code Compliance, and business licenses for the month of March. The reports depict the following highlights: • Year to date building permit valuation is $44,717,606.70 which represents an issuance of 781 building permits through March; • 531 animal control cases have been handled through March; • 499 code compliance cases have been initiated through March; • 17 new licenses were issued to La Quinta based businesses in March; • $1,390.00 - garage sale permit income in March; • $659.00 - Senior Center income in March: New Life Community Church $ 440.00 Cove Neighborhood Association Mtg. 219.00 $ 659.00 21 v) LJJ'' CO O' o I0 N Oi O, OI i0 0 i0' II 00' !0! O 0 O, O In Q 10 CEO,' 0 p' 69 69 O O ' O' O 00 O 00' O 0 O O C) C) O N N J (O 69 69 6q 64 64 y} 64 69 69 LO U 6g N aim, rn ��' o Io Oy}I co (D o o' io ojl oll o; Lo, o jo+ o 1 o' o, I o0i o0 o O m a0 Z!Z� 00: � IcC! I�j fool 69I 69-i E9 O 6c, �, 69 Oi � � 0 0l �pj pi 01 Oy} 0y3 � ! p i I c� l i ,II ! 69 y} I 6c. ' 69 I CN 69,' CIO va O O 0 � O M 0' �I o; O O O 0 O LO- O r+ O Q) lr-. cl 00 00 co O 69 tt N CO CN �t CO �- 0 O I� CO � O O O 14- r. 0 � N 60% CNO � � 00 00 M CD O O W} � 0 � CN 69 CV 69 69 Lj 69 M 6 o0 of W r 69 yi c) .- 69 yi 69 to LL O _ 00 O � iN O' f� O O, 00. L OM. O O 0 10 Ctoi 'p p C N 44 W W H 0 � O M O O N �Y , Oco 6C-) CN �' 000 N O, O i CA ' L0 co a Z O00 M M � 61Y O 61Y E9' '7' �, �}' OI M j �1 O N' 69j 69' M' O LO M n 0 N CD e- 691 EA O, o' �. U-) iCO 0 O 0, O 0 (C) C) 0CD OO O O OCD In �6F} M CO 0O 00 � 0 0 O 64- O 0coO CO U � � �M 69 69 O Nr } J cD O o0 T- _ L cr co _O q co O O O M N Z 00 N 6R 00 O) � qe QO 6 , 69, �, 64 �, y3 O� J 0) o1 + O iLr)�Ih Imo, 0 _ O OI � O tT- .- OI OI IO O I r 0 Y� O 44 O Ni ~ Q M' �' TI �tI Ml �1 �' �I 10 0, O 0 01 C'lI I00 CO M 0 �,1 J' i' ti' til O LO �, N N; O; Oj r-, 69' Oi O, IM' lnI O ti cD O LL,W �' O a Q Z: 10,'} �; MI 00, OI f�, to CN IFF? � N, (D'' O, CN co: 0 O LO �T' co co }'Z LO' CN 69 00, N N � � ~ �, My3 N, 6c} �' y) 69 �- 6g 69 V � 69 (Y) v% 1� H(N J Z C) O, O C) O co O. In 0 O O. O O. O L f- O. O O. O C) C) O O CD O to m 0 O O O 069 O OEfl O Cp O H � a? � cM I O CN v O O � coA O O O O 69 O 0 O O� O �, IN69 69, 64 O j� 69 6/} N 69i, 6p 6pk y3 64 �' ;0 O M �I � �' O, m I� N M 0, 0+_ r0i N, 00 N M 0 N, N, N N �' � H } J W � N O O N �. M, M, 0. Cp; 00 Z! iUl ID Z jUJ �J W I :d �W' I - 1p. j H W I 0, DWI 0: Z 0 O co Q O N N CO �- `'��M �IO�''F-'o�'00Mt-rn� —, H Z 3 n } O J � Q Q W W N W J J Q Z O Q � U } J J Q LL� Q _1 U U U Z O Q 0 ¢ U J F J 0 w w U Q~ z z Q a f= J w U- w z H z W J _� F- _z �' _z m w _ m (n J' J 0 J w U' 0 C�' Q W J W W W 0 J O O J, U' L1J1'' J' O IOI W I-, �Q! C�; I_Z z Q i- Cn col U' w'' I� Ia Q' QI DUI WI W' o � �I ICI 0 0- 2 ANIMAL CONTROL REPORT FOR: MARCH. 2002 Steve Alexander, Jackie Misuraca and Moises Rodarte ANIMAL PICKUPS YEAR TO YEAR TO INCIDENTS YEAR TO YEAR TO DATE 02 DATE 01 HANDLED DATE 02 DATE 01 Dogs Alive 26 91 123 Bite Reports 4 11 7 Dead 4 12 10 Animal Trap OTI 0 4 15 Set Ups 9 14 29 Cats Alive 14 22 48 Cruelty to Dead 6 16 19 Animals 0 1 4 OTI 0 0 0 Other Animals Alive 9 10 6 Vicious Animal Dead 8 22 17 Restraining 0 1 0 TOTAL ANIMALS Alive 49 123 177 Dead 18 50 46 OTI 0 4 15 TOTAL ANIMALS REMOVED 67 177 238 VIOLATIONS: Dogs at Large Noise Disturbance Defecation removal License Violation Other Monthly Total YEAR TO DATE No Owner 18 0 0 0 0 18 47 Warnings 2 0 0 0 0 2 5 Special Hour Patrols 6 Zoning Violations 2 Lost & Found 38 Animal Rescue 0 Outside Agency--0__ City Reclaims 17 Other 21 TOTALS 97 Citations 12 0 3 18 0 33 8 27 2 9 88 100 4 3 0 0 33 38 44 45 206 262 TOTAL MONTHLY INCIDENTS HANDLED: MAR 02- 217 / MAR 01- 278 YEAR TO DATE INCIDENTS HANDLED: MAR 02 - 531 / MAR O1 - 901 CODE COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR: March, 2002 Mar. 02 YEAR TO DATE 02 YEAR TO DATE 01 ABATEMENTS : Nuisance Abatements Started Weed Abatements Started Vehicle Abatements Started Dwelling Abatements 67 292 8 15 45 189 Started 2 3 TOTAL STARTED 122 499 TOTAL COMPLETED 172 433 Case Follow -Ups Home Occupation Inspections Business License Inspections Garage sale permits Issued 197 6 1 139 1805 24 1 335 592 354 2 988 581 1207 27 13 369 00000000000000000 d00000000000000000 to ICT Of) CD 00 0 0 IM M M M M M M M M M M M M M CM M M 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W of O H cn I- w z U w w w a of O Ix z z a0 z zwa� J W ~ } LL - O J w >�QvQCLzC/)/)U- Qww�a ��Ix c~i)C/)z a�wOw}�w?c~i� v Q Q J� otS O U< p g z F- U 0 0 p w y�Wa OJ F OCAY� �- zOmOcn0 <J-JUCW/) �I=?wQac=nawQU�<=aw < <Q ,It U') M N O N 'It O .-- M M N M M I V. M I-- ch CA qT T T U N CA ^ w co w m 0 ti 00 r- ti� ti w O O O O O O O O O O O O O I CD O CD CD CD co CD CD co co co CD CD co CD CD CD CL 'N C; CM Ch CM CM M CM CM C; C; M M C; C; M M M .0NNNN NNNI N N N N N N N N N N ..a0)0Ni00))�0)0)0)0)0)0)rnw00))00))00))00))CY)) y r y U) .a �IUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa I- F-�� zZzZ_Z_Z_z_zz_zz_zzz_z_Z_z �Igg�gg�ggg�g�g�ggg O O LU x-j N ~ z m U W U cn Z •_-p �Q �`- Or'r'�ZD0a `- a0O aoon.O�HamofaaQZwwa --w—a��ww�s�—ww- =ZZ_ zDLLJ J==Z=JJZ L�»a>aw�aao(D>aaa> �=aaUacno=UU==a3U�a �►�o ��oo�no0C)r-0o0O0 J2 O CA �t In M _N N w O O Nt 0 Co CD N I OMCD O O � M 00 L� 00 00 O � 00 00 � Op 00 O Z Cn O z z Q WO _ J C/) W Z � Z 00 H U O� �� Qm ON m aQa S�Y F-U O a coca ca a)N F-j W-iUY WSJ -0 ,t5 0 -�w0 W 2UJ F-ZClQ>,ZcaLLJ �ZW �a JW WYir E �F- W W aYm XwU� cv ,� C� - 4 a`)) ° is=�a��>~�WaWZUZzaZ o c cC� U- o W2O w o �<0Mm- OUa�ODcjUOW0� Um� �mJ NJOwwow_ wIFJ5>Oa MIQQmmOO?-jOOmmmmxw> Q M LO CD e- m 0 N� O O 0 O O 0 Co O rt a m tt U') ti O M O N M O M In CD r- ti � Q) I CO r` Cl) ti O N r- CO CO _O - - r` Co O 00 ti 0 0 00 0 0 M0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 DEPARTMENT REPORT: Li —A— ? T4hf 4 4 a" MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tom Hartung, Director of Building and Safety'% , DATE: April 16, 2002 RE: CVAG Animal Campus Meeting CVAG has scheduled a meeting for April 17th at 3 PM to discuss the Proposed animal campus and has invited an elected representative and the city manager from each jurisdiction to attend. La Quinta will be represented at the meeting. As you know, the city managers from La Quinta, Coachella and Indio have already met with a County representative to discuss improvements to the Indio shelter. The cities have expressed an interest in participating i the costs of upgrading the current shelter (estimated at $700,000) if he County will guarantee that the facility will remain open for an a re length of time. g ed upon Staff will continue to update the City Council on this issue. �a��''Q•c DEPARTMENT REPORT: 44aU _ InIM coxeoxnrv�4. 5 OF T0: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: JERKY HERMAN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORj* DATE: APRIL 16, 2002 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2002 Attached please find a copy of the Community Development Report which outlines the current cases processed by staff for the month of March. P:Monthly Department Report.wpd 1 Z W I- Q a W 0 z W 2 a 0 LU F- O U H 0 aN W C O Z N W = Ca a� a W 13 a: N 2 M N O 0 O +., CtI CN ` ` > O c O .0 0 O a a-' N E •> > a o U Q 0 M 0 Q U N c C C N O CN •— � •— cNn ' 00 O� .a c M O C C C a) > U N co N •C -CC)o O a� .- a 2 c a. U U Lo U a_ U a Q a ir -jE aEvO Q Q Q Q c Cl) +r O cc >. y -E cuc 3 N Lo -0 -C Co 0 >. a) O co �- co � a) a) �'' LO •Cc a) I� O O O .� C c N ,+- N OE U N N O U C N O v <�� •`�� o� oc °� oa 3 L a) N cn c a) C a N O : O a) CIOo 4- (� .> C O cB m a) X O 0 �, a O O � c N O +� cn a) +� M a. C C+ s U` 0 C •C N cn a) Q .0 .c N s 0 c� s }' 0 ca C Cn *.' co C F— O O N> a) O c) Q 0 Cd o 4-0 cc Cn CL a) a° > CU c O O C cL cn .� U) O) > C -C •cn C CL c6 a) Q N. C C c O` N .C] O N O co C a) Ca y-- _O L_ M •� cn 2 (n d C O O 0. cO -i O C a) O O N E r- O -0O +-+ c� cn O N �-+ O C U) "a 0 +� 0 cn cu ``- O N D E C 0 N Q Q U cOn Cn � O O_I LL Q W . a. 00 N •U C O M N r— E U .L c Co -v N '� U c J 'cn 2 -o a X N X c a) E co U � C - ca c _O a) � C (D Q �[ co �--. X LLJ U O Q O Q cy O a O co M O% r '+, M Q . 0 _ co O CY) L- 0 LOCl) M O CV a")�N N M a)Cl) C co 0 a. CY) C 0 CY) OO O a M_ M M O� oO y .0 `- CY) cc a. N a NO aa- n a. O N N F— m F— F- co U U)n 3: c EO F— F— U 3 0 x O U Q U OC cv C O r— a� N '� ,� O •� O O N CF i' L C.0 C U Cl) C N N _ +�U ON •c0N CN -a o C"a ocj0 ccj0 ,CM �N +.+ a) � �1. OEM O� Co O O C O r- CL Q c°� E cu QQ� QQ� Q Q c=n �U +j N O X N a.+ Cl) O L a, m E E cv r— c� o _C a� o c E ai +� o c cu }' a� CY) N LO c o C co c; a Q 0 �� ccu c N L o � �d .� a��D o CO , L O w cu E N N U, m cII -� O m C c N m �? �� ° �-° c� M.E -off C 0Uc'c ��'� a� c � a � y X :c c c co co E � ° C O p c° a� +� N L *-' 0 N O N +� �� E�� U� C U 'D � O-0-C� V c w i .0 E� O ca ,a N D CO j N .0 cCU T N O O o c L0 0 0 +'' .0 LO E +-' ; .O CO w 0 = co .0 ° o Cl j O a ono c OC 0 C cca.j a '+� co 0) a U c r. N +'' cv . _ � ca O � 4-1 D m O > M L c� a. U) O v o C T C m c 'p U co 0 Q ca r- C N o CO C m '+. O LL . _a •O y-- C - +_) , N ° O� = c O O +•' i) O cc C O co O +: O �, L C _ C N mCl) U O = N N d N O O N C - U 0 O N N `� a 0> U O � OC J 0 C O O C CO Oa �U O CO Q N O C C N O° U t O p U U C [� r- L ° -d i C t Q CO� C N Cl) O 0 0 0 O C 4O C r' O O cA O C O N cr °� ac._°° Q co �U °o o ir E oca co oc 0 sCaa a aL� a U U N C U O \ N . Cfi LO M M co M co M 0 00 M > � C O 0pU N -a N ccN N M N p 0 C O p�_i o L o o p, 0 N CL N O N cV N to O a_ md C a U U a Q a o ca o L C a N ' E Q o Y O W C7 C7 a o a L}o, LO co c C o p t c0 O � U p M Q CDa) vcn, n N N CO C N ' O O O O p a� y p O (n Z Oo O 0 0 C� 0> O O � E N N C � .O O N CC O N- }, O_ O L O O Np- inc„n LUNU)M wC�v �m w�u w�U �v O O O -O C O 0 •� •� •> V c cn co '0 N N N . c O C O> � O C C N .� p. CD M O .O O 'cu v _O a� N E O• Q '� U U O a o U U U a a L Q U a U Q Q o CU Q,aE c �- cn +� E a N c ° O ° > c -C a) cn m M .0 y `�° •�, c c� L—" . L- c m m 3 a� o E �' U E a) z ' oo � m a c° w c � }; o -C a cn U O o F- ° 0° ° ° �•�•' v, c c rn +� c (D v c V o Um O a c cu)� O E ° U cn N cU o= cn -° rn +r °' ° c ° W M° -o cv cn a c U o C O cn c p M c� c D1 -C ' co E O O � U •> 3: N 0 m > cu U 0-C +-� U O �- O `- %— `— O Z O _ +- N O i O C> cc O O +.,, cn • co r- 0 C m OC Q co w E cn cn '� O = y.. ` -D E c O L O co U cc co U 2 Q IL Q d U) �= J O O O J O N N a U p .- U) _c co a`) Co V m o d c Cl) O MZ•u (� U O N c i..r a co W O J U)O -0 O E M Cfl 0 co 'a E CD omo LO > .a C N 00 C M co a Cl) O M c M -p N -p M 70 N '> F-- Q O U) F- H• 2 LW-] O a W cc co M a W Ml O J a a Gr- N o 0 0 0 0 0 O V 75 m O CD 04 ` O O N 00 O O m y CL 0 0 O LO c 0 O n IOC) pOj O 0 o+ � o f c, a M N M 0 a CO X M e�- � Y C e0 C y Cc O Y r O 0 a o m � c 0 CL C� a m -o CD m a � cD z n 0 m ca am+ H O O Ci C C C O C) Z LL o m CM c c *, O O =� O e0 7 y C DEPARTMENT REPORT: _(,40 ILOJI c- INCOUO TM ti of9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY C CIL DODIE HORVITZ, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRE O APRIL 16, 2002 TRANSMITTAL OF COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2002 UPCOMING EVENTS OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE MONTH OF MAY 2002: May 1 *Intermediate Bridge Lessons May 1 *Watercolor Lessons May 1 *Word Processing, Level II May 1 * E-Mail Level 1 May 4 Catalina Island Excursion May 4 Mastering Microsoft Power Point, Senior Center May 6 * E-Mail Level 11 May 6 *Monthly Putting Contest May 6 *Introduction to Word Processing May 7 *Free Blood Pressure, Glucose and Cholesterol Screening May 7 *Line Dance Class May 7 *Congresswoman Mary Bono's Mobile Office May 8 *Introduction to Computers May 9 Fashion Island Shopping Excursion, Newport Beach May 9 *Free Legal Consultation May 11 2 on 2 Grass Volleyball Tournament, Adams Park May 13 *Introduction to the Internet May 16 *Free Medicare and Insurance Counseling May 16 *Hoedown Luncheon May 17 *Free HI -CAP Counseling May 18 Shopping South of the Border, Algodones, Mexico May 21 *Free Hearing Consultations May 23 *Cooking Class with Executive Chef, Scott Robertson May 28 *AARP Mature Driving May 30 *AARP Mature Driving *Daytime Senior Center class or activity �ti T 6 4t!t 4�Q�rw Community Services Department Attendance Report for the Month of March 2002 Summary Sheet Program 2002 2001 Variance Sessions Per Month 2002 2001 Leisure Classes 359 115 243 31 8 Special Events 373 485 -74 5 5 Adult Sports 627 124 503 55 21 Senior Center 2382 2039 343 153 121 Total 3741 2763 1015 244 155 Senior Services Senior Center 480 518 -38 15 15 Total 480 518 -38 15 15 Sports Complex Use LQ Sports & Youth 6,500 6000 500 30 25 Total 61500 6000 500 30 25 Total Programs 101721 9,281 1477 2891 195 Volunteer Hours Senior Center 1050 1,410 -360 Community Services 12 0 12 Total Volunteer Hours 1062 1,410 -348 Monthly Revenue Senior Center $ 8,236.50 $ 4,909.50 $ 3,327.00 Community Services $ 5,597.00 $ 8,339.00 $ (2,742.00) Total Revenue $ 13,833.50 $ 13,248.50 $ 585.00 Revenue Year to Date Senior Center $ 69,458.50 $ 49,394.50 $ 20,064.00 Community Services $ 57,328.00 $ 49,681.00 $ 1,647.00 Total Revenue to Date $126,786.50 $ 99,075.50 $ 21,711.00 2 3 a `fi Cl Community Services Program Report for March 2002 gong gong 2nni 2nni 2002 2001 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Sessions Sessions Leisure Classes Beginning Computers 8 32 10 40 -8 4 4 Itty Biddy Sports 10 40 0 0 40 4 0 Jazzercize 8 32 0 0 32 4 0 Hatha Yoga 27 108 19 76 32 4 4 Adobe Photoshop 9 27 0 0 27 3 0 Art of Painting 5 20 0 0 20 4 0 Microsoft Excel 7 28 0 0 28 4 0 Italian for Travelers 18 72 0 0 72 4 0 Totals 921 359 291 116 243 31 8 I I ,2nng 2nn2 2nni 2001 2002 2001 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Sessions Sessions Special Events Tiny Tot Olympics 51 51 52 52 -1 1 1 Mexico Excursion 46 46 102 102 -56 1 1 Annual Egg Hunt 250 250 275 275 -25 1 1 Fashion Island 11 11 22 22 -11 1 1 2 on2 Volleyball Tourn. 1 15 15 34 34 19 1 1 Totals 1 3731 3731 4851 485 -741 5 5 gong 2nn2 20111 2001 2002 2001 Participants Total Participation Earticipants Total Participation Variance Sessions Sessions Adult Sports Open Basketball 227 227 124 124 103 15 8 Adult Soccer League 1 1001 4001 01 01 400 41 0 Totals 1 3271 6271 1241 1241 5031 191 8 Recreation Totals 1 7921 13591 6381 7251 6271 55 21 Page 2 Senior Center Attendance 2002 2002 2001 2001 egistered TotalRegistered Total Meetings Participants Participation artici ants articipation Variance 2002 2001 Senior Activities ACBL Bridge 274 274 319 319 -45 4 4 Ballroom Dance, Complimentary 18 18 0 0 18 1 0 Bridge, Duplicate/Social 668 668 604 604 64 13 13 Ice Cream Social 34 4 59 59 -25 5 4 Knitting Guild Club 11 11 0 0 11 1 0 Line Dance, Complimentary 7 0 0 7 1 0 Monthly Birthday Party 39 39 36 36 3 11 1 Monthly Luncheon 86 86 92 92 -6 1 1 Motion Express 18 18 0 0 18 1 0 Movie Time 47 47 90 90 73 4 5 Putting Contest 8 8 5 5 3 1 1 Seminars 10 10 0 0 10 1 0 Senior Activity Total 1220 1220 1205 1205 15 34 29 Senior Leisure Courses Ballroom Dance 28 42 12 50 -8 6 5 Ceramics 12 32 10 39 -7 41 5 Computer 5 43 11 30 13 12 3 Cooking 16 15 0 0 15 1 0 CPR Class 11 11 0 0 11 1 0 Dog Training Class 14 45 19 25 20 8 6 Exercise 58 509 52 389 120 13 13 Music Magic 4 6 6 24 -18 13 2 Spanish Lessons 35 48 18 28 20 6 5 Stained Glass 10 30 9 12 18 4 3 Watercolor 9 34 10 36 -2 41 4 Senior Leisure Courses Total 202 815 147 633 182 72 46 Senior Leisure Classes Arts and Crafts 26 26 0 0 26 4 0 Bridge Lessons 48 48 0 0 48 4 0 Computer Tutor 6 6 17 17 -11 6 17 Creative Writing 16 16 4 4 12 4 4 Golden Tones 65 65 52 52 13 4 4 Line Dance 8 8 0 0 8 1 0 Painting 4 4 0 0 4 1 0 Quilting 14 14 36 36 -22 2 5 Rug Hooking 8 8 8 8 0 4 3 Tai Chi 30 30 28 28 2 4 5 Tap Dance 30 30 19 19 11 4 3 Woodcarving 53 53 37 37 16 5 5 Yoga 39 39 0 0 39 4 0 Senior Leisure Uasses Total 347 347 201 201 146 47 46 TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAMS 1769 2382 1553 2039 343 153 121 Senior Services A.A.R.P. "55 Alive" 22 22 28 28 -6 2 2 A.A.R.P. Tax -Aide 48 48 44 44 4 4 4 Ambassadors 77 77 75 75 2 n/a n/a FIND Food Distribution 371 371 425 425 -54 4 5 Health Screenings 11 11 42 42 -31 1 2 Hearing Consultation 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 I.I.D. Energy Assistance 34 34 42 42 -8 n/a n/a I.I.D. Energy Assistance/No fee 4 4 6 6 -2 n/a n/a Legal Consultation 4 4 17 17 -13 1 1 Medicare/Hi Cap Consultation 12 12 3 3 9 n/a n/a Share Meetings/Sign-up 5 5 2 2 3 2 2 TOTAL SENIOR SERVICES 590 590 685 685 -95 15 17 SENIOR CENTER TOTAL 2359 2972 2238 2724 248 168 Page 3. L DEPARTMENT REPORT:-4 L0J_ c 4 V - Ncouom 5 ti OF TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY C UNCIL Kq FROM: DODIE HORVITZ, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECT049 DATE: APRIL 16, 2002 SUBJECT: 20T" ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION COMMITTEE REPORT The 201h Anniversary Celebration Committee is finalizing the details for the four day event to be held April 25-28, 2002. The 20t' Anniversary Celebration Committee is comprised of the following members: Two Council Members (Terry Henderson and Ron Perkins) Two Members Historical Society (Barbara Irwin and Pat Cross) Two Members Chamber of Commerce (Kurt Spurgin and KimBerly Keyton) One Member LQ Arts Foundation ( Penny Reilly) One Member Cultural Arts Commission (Rosita Shamis) One Member Community Services Commission (Joan Rebich) One Member Architecture and Landscape Review Committee (Bill Bobbitt) Listed below are the activities being planned for the weekend of April 25-28: Thursday April 25 Chamber Mixer hosted by the City of La Quinta City Hall Courtyard 5:30 p.m. Friday April 26 Multi -generational Talent Show 7:00-9:00 p.m. La Quinta Senior Center Saturday April 27 Parade: Theme- La Quinta, Gem of the Desert, "Shining Brighter Than Ever!" Bermudas to Frances Hack Park 10:00-1 1:00 a.m. Community Picnic 1 1:00- 2:00 p.m. Fritz Burns Park Arts and Crafts Show 1:00-4:00 p.m. La Quinta Senior Center S:\Community Services\CCReports\20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION REPORT 04-16-02..wpd 233 Cove Oasis Trail Hike 5:30-6:30 p.m. Cove Oasis Trailhead Star Gazing 7:30-9:30 p.m. Cove Oasis Trailhead Fishing Derby 10:00 P.M. to Lake Cahuilla County Park 10:00 a.m. Sunday April 28 5k/10k Run 7:00-9:00 a.m. Fritz Burns Park Fishing Derby 10:00 a.m. Lake Cahuilla County Park Art Show 10:00-4:00 p.m. LQ Arts Foundation Site Concert/Fireworks 5:30-9:00 p.m. La Quinta High School The Committee has been meeting on a regular basis, with updates as to the progress of each event and the details associated with the activity. The following information is provided per event, as of Monday, April 8, 2002: Chamber Mixer: The Chamber of Commerce (Chamber) has coordinated this event to be held in the Courtyard of City Hall. Attachment 1 provides a listing of the participating organizations. Final details are being coordinated with city staff as to the placement of tables and equipment. Each participating organization will be given a Certificate of Appreciation on behalf of the City for participating in the 20th Anniversary Celebration. The certificates can be presented during the event. At this event, the 20th Anniversary Celebration Commemorative wine glasses will be used at the Wine Garden. The glasses will be sold for $5.00 which includes the wine. Funds raised by the glasses will be used to offset the cost of the glasses. Multi -Generational Talent Show: The Senior Center staff is coordinating this event. As of this report, 10 talent acts have expressed interest in participating in the event. Each participant will be given a Certificate of Appreciation on behalf of the City for participating in the 20th Anniversary Celebration.* *The Committee has requested that a special meeting be held by the City Council on May 14 to S:\Community Services\CCReports\20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION REPORT 04-16-02..wpd 2 "' 4 u02 recognize the volunteers and talent show participants. The Committee has recommended the event be held in the Courtyard, with cookies and punch available during the presentation of Certificates of Appreciation to individuals for participating in the 20' Anniversary Celebration. Community Parade: The Community Services Director is coordinating this event. As of this report, there are 52 entries for the parade. The categories of entries include: Antique or Classic Vehicle Car Club Band Color Guard Youth Organization -Non Music Youth Organization-Music/Dance Floats -Business Division Floats -Non Business Division Equestrian Special Entry Judging will be completed by the Southern California Judges Association, a professional parade judging organization. Trophies will be given in the first and second place categories for the above listed activities. Certificates of Appreciation will be given to all other entries on behalf of the City for participating in the 20th Anniversary Celebration. The trophies and certificates will be presented during the Community Picnic. Community Picnic: The Recreation Supervisor is coordinating this event. As of this report, there are 48 vendors participating in the Community Picnic. The La Quinta Rotary Club will be providing free hot dogs, Coca Cola will provide free drinks and Culligan Water will provide free bottled water. Certificates of Appreciation will be presented to the vendors at the picnic for participating in the 20th Anniversary Celebration. Felt pennants will be handed to participants of the picnic this year. In years past, frisbees and beach balls were given out. Arts and Crafts Show: The Senior Center staff is coordinating this event. As of this report, there are 19 vendors registered to participate. Directional signs will be placed from Fritz Burns Park to the Senior Center so picnic participants can visit the Arts and Crafts Show. At 2:30, the La Quinta Arts Foundation will formally unveil the mural on the back wall of the stage at the Senior Center. Cove Oasis Trailhead Hike: The La Quinta Historical Society is coordinating this event. Mr. Philip Ferranti will lead the hike to the various trailheads located at the Cove Oasis. Mr. Ferranti will give an overview of the trails along with the flora and fauna one could expect to see while hiking. Staff will have temporary S:\Community Services\CCReports\20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION REPORT 04-16-02..wpd 2 v J trailhead markers made to be placed at the various trailheads. After the trail hike, a tree dedication ceremony will be held at the Cove Oasis Trailhead to honor the Hammer family for donating the palm trees located at the Oasis. City staff is coordinating this activity. Star Gazing: The Historical Society is coordinating this event with the Astronomical Society. Volunteers will provide telescopes for the public to view the stars and planets. The moon will be in full phase during this event, however, some planets and stars will be visible. Fishing Derby: Mr. Bill Bobbitt, Committee member of the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee, is coordinating this event. Approximately 2500 pounds of catfish will be released into Lake Cahuilla on Wednesday, April 24 at 3:00 p.m. There will be a media opportunity to promote this activity at this time. The Fishing Derby begins at 10:00 p.m. on Saturday night at Lake Cahuilla and ends at 10:00 a.m. on Sunday morning. The Riverside County Regional Parks District is managing the activity and Mr. Bobbitt will be the City's representative at the event. Gem of the Desert Run: Klein/Clark Sports is coordinating this event. 7500 flyers were sent to runners that have participated in past runs coordinated by Klein/Clark Sports, as well as being listed on the website Active.com, which targets athletes of all ages and abilities. The flyer was also included in the Chamber's mid -month mailer. Staff has distributed flyers to various locations as well. Art Under the Umbrellas: The La Quinta Arts Foundation is coordinating this event. It will be held at the new La Quinta Arts Foundation site on Washington Street. There will be arts and crafts vendors, a food booth and a children's art activity center. La Quinta Student Entertainment and Fireworks: The Recreation Coordinator and Commissioner Loudon is working with Mr. Bugg of La Quinta High School to coordinate this event. Attachment 2 is a preliminary program of entertainment scheduled for the event. Mr. Bugg is arranging all of the entertainment, equipment, parking and facilities needed for this activity. During this time, the La Quinta High School Football Team will be recognized for their CIF championship by receiving a Certificate of Achievement by the City. All acts performing in the event will receive a Certificate of Appreciation on behalf of the City for participating in the 20th Anniversary Celebration. The City of La Quinta contributed $5,000 toward the fireworks show. As of S:\Community Services\CCReports\20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION REPORT 04-16-02..wpd v this report, the Chamber of Commerce has solicited additional funds for the fireworks show, as provided in Attachment 3. It is anticipated that there will be a 10 minute fireworks show after the entertainment section of the event. The event sponsors will receive a gift basket containing 20th Anniversary Celebration materials, and VIP seating at the event as well as their names listed in the program and their banners hung around the stadium during the event. In addition to the above listed activities, the events have been publicized in the Chamber of Commerce "Gem," activity postcards have been mailed to every La Quinta resident, Morris Communication will advertise the events on five radio stations numerous times of the day throughout the month of April, as well as have live remotes at many of the events. Ads will also be placed in the Desert along with press releases and news stories. The events are also listed on the City's website. Seven banners have been placed throughout the City, as well as posters in local businesses and in the City's parks. Waste Management of the Desert has agreed to be a corporate sponsor by supplying all the trash receptacles, recycling bins, dumpsters and port-o-letts for the event. The Committee has requested 400 stuffed Gamby's be allocated for use by the Committee for various purposes. Discussion regarding the distribution of the Gamby's include being a part of the gift basket for event sponsors, given to talent show participants, and volunteers for the event. The Committee would also like to include other City materials developed for the 20th Anniversary, such as writing pens and lapel pins as gift basket materials and to be used for variety of promotional activities associated with the 201h Anniversary Celebration. The Committee will finalize the distribution of the Gamby's and the promotional materials at the April 15, 2002, 20th Anniversary Celebration meeting. A final update will be provided to the City Council at the April 16, 2002, City Council meeting regarding the coordination of events, distribution of the materials and recruitments of volunteers. Volunteers for the event are being recruited through La Quinta High School, the La Quinta Senior Center and the various organizations participating in the 20th Anniversary Celebration. 23 S:\Communi Services\CCRe orts\20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION REPORT 04-16-02..wpd tY P ATTACHMENT 1 City of La Quinta 20`h Anniversary Celebration CHAMBER MIXER "Taste of La Quinta" (As of 4-8-02) Mixer Participants: Food: The Beer Hunter Desert Sage Desert Cities Catering Jensen's Finest Foods Rubio's Baja Grill Soul of China. Drinks: La Quinta Cli$house (Wine Tasting in 2e Coca Cola (Soft Drinks) anniversary commemorative wine glasses) Entertainment: Star 106.9 will be on site providing music for the evening Display Tables: City of La Quinta La Quinta Chamber of Commerce 2%3 nd Cora r� V o C Vl 'P;-k PWA, jo O O r d ml o �'►� tA Pa ? N 0-40 n � ATTACHMENT 2 o N r. two Wy o roo w N �, ° t, b w -d�,wa N ro c zw Cq o w © p-'cn © © w ra. o o © �. © �'a�-© y © tA n p, p) w_`�,,,o+��r w G . Z w o w ° QLn .�. '� .... m N a+ r'� f0 "1 rt �i r ~ ry.� .i. (AQ+ .'� o � A"' d Lm rt � �+ Qj � '�'1 w N r� � � � • w � ro ppp,.. f�0 � . � � P" o n � iCi �•+ w w �•0~q v, 9- o n �<y ;jo won orox'C) NwNti ro �w��0 w p.ro NW�. Lm 't w y r--� "b ,• LA -�Q'--•jw�w '..wH�� C��.p•,ro0 �' �'� off. n w N Q, �yy LA ° n w N Q, o ro �_ (� rO ro _ r ,• R' p. o N �O f O =roodD�R°, �<�-•� 0�<� �n OG' �•a wn -tip -1 O f9 n n r0 n 'U 04 l"1� ro -1 p., O y O �< ,,1•, �•• p. ro p� O w-t m o 04 rr,,•a'f0� pw ��-+�w °'.��- � ovarr ° o��N o��r �m "' as q� Q. w w �. Q © Q .0 tt~' 0 I AD ts: eN L7 CD .may. r.+• Is s s ro t3C C/I O N C O t7 Cam') CD xq to d CD a O pIt= G-- t--r CD --y CD L^ CD O O n O O r C/1 C O O 7d n 0 0 A. 24 ATTACHMENT 3 OF T f 4R o City of La Quinta 20`" Anniversary Celebration FIREWORKS SPONSORS As of 4-8-02 EVENT SPONSOR City. of La Quinta $5000.00 $5000.00 GOLD SPONSORS First Bank (La Quinta) 500.00 A&M Construction 500.00 Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District 500.00 Else Loudon 500.00 Imperial Irrigation District 500.00 Mazda Superstore 500.00 La Quinta Chamber of Commerce 500.00 PFF Bank & Trust 500.00 4000.00 SILVER SPONSORS Infinity Hair 250.00 Mark S. Mor & Associates 250.00 n ^ _ ft"A- W $Ub . 500.00 Total Sponsors 9500.00 Cost of Fireworks Show: 7500.00 Additional Revenue Raised + 2000.00 241 �. .00 C&t!t 44 Incoxvoxnm `4 � 5 OF T 9� TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COYNCIL FROM: DODIE HORVITZ, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTO A, DATE: APRIL 16, 2002 SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL 20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION COMMITTEE REPORT Pursuant to the 201h Anniversary Celebration Committee Report contained in the April 16, 2002 City Council packet, additional information would be reported to the City Council after the 201h Anniversary Celebration Committee meeting held on Monday, April 15, 2002. The following information is presented on behalf of the 201h Anniversary Celebration Committee. Listed below are the activities being planned for the weekend of April 25-28: Thursday April 25 Chamber Mixer hosted by the City of La Quinta City Hall Courtyard 5:30 p.m. Friday April 26 Multi -generational Talent Show 7:00-9:00 p.m. La Quinta Senior Center Saturday April 27 Parade: Theme- La Quinta, Gem of the Desert, "Shining Brighter Than Ever!" Bermudas to Fritz Burns Park 10:00-1 1:00 a.m. Community Picnic 1 1:00- 2:00 p.m. Fritz Burns Park Arts and Crafts Show 1:00-4:00 p.m. La Quinta Senior Center Added Activity: Mural Dedication 2:30 p.m. La Quinta Senior Center S:\Community Services\CCReports\SUPPLEMENTAL 20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION REPORT 04-16-02..wpd Added Activity: Cove Oasis Trail Hike Cove Oasis Trailhead Hammer Tree Dedication Cove Oasis Trailhead Star Gazing Cove Oasis Trailhead Fishing Derby Lake Cahuilla County Park Sunday April 28 5k/10k Run Fritz Burns Park Fishing Derby Lake Cahuilla County Park Art Show LQ Arts Foundation Site Concert/Fireworks La Quinta High School 5:30-6:30 p.m. 6:30 p.m. 7:30-9:30 p.m. 10:00 P.M. to 10:00 a.m. 7:00-9:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. 10 : 00-4: 00 p.m. 5:30-9:00 p.m. The Committee has been meeting on a regular basis, with updates as to the progress of each event and the details associated with the activity. The following information is provided per event, as of Monday, April 15, 2002: Chamber Mixer: The Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors will act as Ambassadors for the event, with City staff and Commissioners assisting with clean up of the event. Additional volunteers are not needed for this event. The Committee recommends that each restaurant that participates in the event be given a Gamby for their participation. It is anticipated there will be approximately 10 Gamby's needed for this event. Multi -Generational Talent Show: The Senior Center staff has recruited volunteers for this event. The volunteers will act as ambassadors for the event and help with the ice cream social. It is anticipated that there will be approximately 20 volunteers at this event. Community Parade: The Community Services Director has recruited volunteers S:\Community Services\CCReports\SUPPLEMENTAL 20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION REPORT /� 04-16-02..wpd 2 4 v,) u� through the Public Services Academy at La Quinta High School, the La Quinta Senior Center and other Senior Centers. At this time, 14 volunteers have signed up from the Indio Senior Center, and staff is waiting to hear from the Public Service Academy as to the number of volunteers. It is anticipated that approximately 26 Public Service Academy students will sign up to volunteer for the parade. Community Picnic: The Recreation Supervisor has recruited volunteers from the Associated Student Body at La Quinta High School for this event. It is anticipated that there will be approximately 20 volunteers at this event. Arts and Crafts Show: The Senior Center staff is coordinating this event and has recruited approximately 10 volunteers to assist with this event. At this event, at 2:30 p.m., the La Quinta Arts Foundation will dedicate the mural that has been painted on the back wall of the stage area at the Senior Center. The Committee would like to give a Gamby to the artist of the mural. Cove Oasis Trailhead Hike: The La Quinta Historical Society is coordinating this event and will recruit their volunteers. After the trail hike, a tree dedication ceremony will be held at the Cove Oasis Trailhead to honor the Hammer family for donating the palm trees located at the Oasis. The Committee has nominated Mayor Pro Tem Stanley Sniff to conduct the tree dedication. The Committee would like to give a Gamby to the Hammer family. Star Gazing: The Historical Society is coordinating this event with the Astronomical Society. Volunteers will provide telescopes for the public to view the stars and planets. Fishing Derby: Mr. Bill Bobbitt, Committee member of the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee, is coordinating this event. The Committee has suggested that Gamby's be given to those who catch a prize money fish. There are 10 prize money fish being stocked in the lake. Gem of the Desert Run: Klein/Clark Sports is coordinating this event. The Committee has recommended that the top finishers in each division be given a Gamby. There will be 96 top finishers. Art Under the Umbrellas: The La Quinta Arts Foundation is coordinating this event with their volunteers. S:\Community Services\CCReports\SUPPLEMENTAL 20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION REPORT 0 A � 04-16-02..wpd �' ��3 La Quinta Student Entertainment and Fireworks: The Recreation Coordinator and Commissioner Loudon is working with Mr. Bugg of La Quinta High School to coordinate this event. There will be volunteers from the High School and the Chamber of Commerce at this event. Sponsors which have contributed $500 towards the fireworks show will be given a gift basket containing commemorative wine glasses, a pennant and a Gamby for their contribution. There will be 10 gift baskets given to fireworks sponsors. The Committee has requested 400 stuffed Gamby's be allocated for use by the Committee for various purposes. Discussion regarding the distribution of the Gamby's include being a part of the gift basket for event sponsors, and volunteers for all of the events. The Committee would also like to include other City materials developed for the 20th Anniversary, such as writing pens and lapel pins as gift basket materials and to be used for variety of promotional activities associated with the 20th Anniversary Celebration. The Committee is requesting approximately 50 pens for gift baskets and other event sponsors. The Committee is requesting lapel pens be given to volunteers of the event, at the time of presentation of the Certificates of Appreciation. The number of pins needed for the volunteers is 200. The number of volunteers at the events on Attachment 1 is estimated at 227. However, some volunteers will work more than one event, therefore the number of pins does not reflect the estimated number of pins needed. S:\Community Services\CCReports\SUPPLEMENTAL 20TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION REPORT 04-16-02..wpd ATTACHMENT -nmD0TcnmoDDoo�ooD cD ` o� o G) N 3 CD 0� m 33 3-o= CDC . - o (D .. (D cD-i a p n > �' o ,.« rn pr m Sao N 'U�� '� 5 (n w C cOn cD o CD w — o v (n 0' _. v O 3 m -n o- v- o_ m 0' o CD N T CD n 7c = O (CD S CD (D (D O O � U) CD X X X X X X X- cn X X X J J J X X a O_ S XX.J.JXXXXXXX><XX= (D O Q (D cn O N m N = X X X 7C XW X 7C o cn (D 2 n (D O xx c X X X Q 0 77 cn 0 c (D O 000 O 0 0 0 0 0 cn N r W WOOO)O O-�OOOOO O OOOO — N o O � =r "° D CD <. 0 cn CD C- C: n (D (D (D Q N O O 2 4 FV -J--I==I WIM0 riI a, MMW.-1LA MIM r g TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Roy F. Stephenson, P.E., Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: April 16, 2002 RE: Public Works/Engineering Department Report for the Month of March 2002 Attached please find the following: 1. Citizen Service Request Summary; 2. Encroachment Permit and Plan Check Services Summary; 3. Capital Improvement Plan Status Update. 5tepnenson, r.t. Public Works Director/City Engineer T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020416Dept.wpd 24 cn o � Q N C) . O O o0G O NC p O � j Z0 C� OC) a) a) �c �Va)_ C.) > N Co i - N >. �- - : N y a) a Q v° C a) C 7 c °Q-o •D CU UU N� ° UM cn c0 y UM c a) ° c U 06 Cp U `*= a) O +� V C cn U a) 0 U C C a) iii += a� U U � a) in 4- a) '+' y +M +, 4, a C U ►- 0 C (U CoC_ L C C (a a) CCU c a y ''� c C7 p u) M cn -007 c p to co C7 N ca — O F- Lu c m O a, O N c0 O p 0 y co a) cn Q C.) Ca) -C l.0) U op C 0.6. ) O dm.. + Cc +�C F N Op O m n X aC ca aa a) O m U (n E p aU +� C Oa) O ECD ca � a�CD W cn o �Y °rn a^Ca)O c ° O }; c�°a� E c E E E c EV Cc ari +a O C CD " . +- X N 0) NV ' M ) pvM ai co U W c +� c N N C O aO C Cm a C a 4- >• � N .- m CU a) c H C+°C C ccEy Co OU Q.� U ca-a � n.- >Q� w�wo U +-' O C O V_ J a) �C a) a) c JOC a) a) C a) 8-01 C }, C:O V>' vE O m C O O OU Cc Na) .O .o o O +d p co 7 �LO U O+,Cn ' U C U U a) U C c W aE NW 4- C +E+= a pc y yO` cn aU a) p 00 00 � 0a DUcna U a) Op Oa) inUcna a Z O p: -p N NO NO N N O O O V O i �- N ~ NCl) O O O o T- 0 O O Z y o a, U Z -a O o O o O C7 O V- W 00 0) 0) C) 3� ( O 0) 0) 0) N LO N V- o) LO Cfl (") 00 N O N O O CO CO W C) 0) � O CY)N M d• N CO N 00 N m v) N O a N C m E s a) co W U y m }, � O c0 � O 4-J a) � co CL Q U= 0 s C •C U = -CE N U CLa`. C� CLcnm U N O '+� U U N CD O 00 Q L L O O O • CD � e— L O -C +' y 0U O 2 O •O C O `� N L �00 00 L L M� O } NCM c Q� CD 0 + a) N a� CD Q U c O a aS co O ��-, -'o a� °- E E O c a� E E "0 co 'o c �- 1 co O M U O N C "a U) U c v) U p U a.i co +r c0 = Q� O (7 O N N _ c (O >� N O U v L Q +L.+ O +� Urnrn c� O 00--LL 0 COON O co E �. OO y C UOOcn CD UON 4-E YQCC ._. � � O O co O cc co m ° > a) m � 0 n -D Q a O 5 U VN 0 Cl)o N 4-0 Ov, CVO a c U U +toJ W 0 C E 0.� V) c -a O > y � c E ++pC - .0 0 i cn N O y C W C J( N O U N O '0 cn U) .� C +n' 06 U) O ca m w O -� � > y O rn +-� —) c U Co-0 a a)n vs O Co O U O N Z O u- cn .> LD cn oy �. _ +, �;F- +7 U -o a O +0, (3)(A O � �N O � a � N � O U � � U > U c L >• +' > o c c c� ca O � �- ca N �° E �_ cLa c _ � +•+ +r �.., cn C C • N C` N U rn to C N rn O N C C N C cn �- N +0.+ +-� N C L C C (n DUU(nF- 0 0 0 a) `' OU(nOC o 0 0 DUQ a) O O ODULo O U N� DO (n N O O'o N O y 0 U m 4-J cn ++ O v� Z 0 F- N N p O O O O O O N N V as oo n (0 LO LO rn i N O O O N O N O (V O N O N O M O N O -� Z W It LO It LO O in n O U 'C N O O_ O O O NO � Z N N N r— N �O Q N .0 -O E N .0 -� E Vi W m O � O z O +O � C N i N o0 O n M M O N O M M N O ('M O M O C0 W00 U, O LO N 00 LA N O7 LA N O N O o �' � (0 N m � �y > vs vs O +' U C N 4-0 C O = c +j a)O O > Ucc ca a) c cn m � —� .-, O L -0 cQ cu Q W pw ie (D )> + co c ( U c Cl)_ N CL-0 J W cn 2 �' cc o-'Q� of 0 C �U N a� N a E �� a C Q_ , L Q to C cn cn C C O cn >. +� > + OD N -0 _ _ m "O UL(') 2(n a.(f) -�� Q� Q(n r� O UQ a U a U a 0 3 w- Co -p .a O +' a) X a) U L: (L) O� O +J 1 (M N C m a) L co a) O "o �� cCp 0 v N L O C E a Q M N O �O N O N .� O O Qo0 p V v C�- M O N �000 O� .. i v L U co Q. v co V Q c ` U? M 4-1 C 3 N O v co Cn L O C� O O O c V �O L N U C a) `- co L U rn L U A> UO C 0 +-J woaV- Q Coco0 UU vv � �a % c c c O a)O � 00� cu coo .. OC Q_ O v �o v> U �•� c •• v L �Q cn 4) 0 adS E M "' a) o N O cn Q O w +' O = a) > Q `n •+_, c_v c a) p a. c L M .c E C E� CO fL., cu L 0 O) N U Q E c a) O • V O E U O 0 �> N dS O co U V O. c cn O '.,. O j O +� L O Fm C �V O •_ C E O m V c O L O O N M O V � Q Q y a. W L E L N � +-' 'mow �� O N `�0 o 0 � C L +-+ O a) L _ O �f- G p�Q 3 co .O LLCC m E a) C � co• C•QM c V ` co-0 cn 0) -0 Z a) L co C 0 � O 2 00 OC O 00 F— v> cn O (o � � 2 E , C � O) O a) c +� C C :0 N C v �C O .. U . , V E O p C v O .. C ,� C� a) }' .. c E C O +�cm c E C C E C C (� U a) o6 .. N •N •m � C N C .S 0) a) •^ � cn a) a) >tn co +0., E �- cn 4-1v> .y c a) j V) O W-0CLM 30000 CDv �a_N 0 a) 0Uo) O y 0 C 0 0UWa- O D-0 O +' 4.J a) 0 0 U M CL? a)O O a)O O — N N N O N O .� N O N UCNO O O O p \ clqM i N � �- N N N Z N LO rn M O n d• O O O V N N N N Z -p N M O O O O O (� 0 0 NO O O O O N cA W i I r- I � N I r- I T- N O O O O O O 4-0 (A o0 � O V- T- O O c0 rn O O O O O M n O n O O O O It 00 O 00 O N W O N lA ('M CO CO M O (J O rn O U') c0 O It M lA O ('M 00 r- m v> v> U> -a>• �n O y O O J N CO cn cn L C O co O C O L C-)3 O .� a) c > E E C H CU m o E U :D cn a) E > �G co 3 0 C CL 0_ U) Q L a> > co +LLIN.7 > C > O +w-J / c c• c -0 >� �V O 4 •V p U- ° v'Q co a E a> -0 E ° v°'> s a cm -0 !n E a) o OC — a- to o N i5 0 rn W a> co c `� E O >` a) a) > c co L co co co L a) N -C + a : �= + E Co �: + ' �- . 0 N co O a. a. i- F- M CL M U U) a.. F- Lf) > a. 0?4 -p M N L O N O N V (D M O Cl)C LL O O -C N O p c s LL Ca 0 �•N CO 4- N N CC O 2 •E V +J} U � a) C Q O N o U coo E L rn O a o aD W OC to c U � a? O a a� U° a• N o N s _ a.., (� ' .0 N C 4'' 0 06 � O N N O 4-+ G C aF- V N > —° 4-J•� \ a. s CD •a >C Q) 4J O N O D U N a. L �N a) U) J Z p -o a) CD .� c c c C co Z N O O O O C.)*, }' Z c CD ° 'E i -O -O E Wi O O O co LO LO O N N (� 0 W O N It Crj ar*- r- M a a) V- co N m LO J 0 � a) H 0 U) � L � O W -0 W 0. '0 • o p o � o ` �- L Cl. U- L. a L. (D a IL- L U - � c LL U O a U z a W Y 0 J a O O N O1-- CC) O T O T 6fi O N F— J Z Q Z G 6a To 0000 00 0 0 r Q N r T N O O W �j O N N a 0 N N V 0360 H O G V fp r T N W r r W m T N z N �- N M r (p T r N r r az 04 a O M o000 oT o an (n C� G W W W m J '.� OT. ti coeN- o 0 T 0 �- LO O N zp V �O W � W ti M O O T O T In O N 0) � V z W ui Cyrco O OL p C O O O0 C Rf ca U to U .t'- O.t0 - O �.• C' co co0 J . w F- CL I-- U � F- 25 0 6 V Q H z LL 0 U w U w J0000ov- tn O 0 0 1- N UU) N CDMv- v0d' CO W N � W 6a 6F} 6F} 69 ER Q O H Z000LO(D!' =)OOO T I- Ln CD M V- tD <CN W tp�a W 69 69 6H ER? 6f y} W co us � O N f� M N Z O Q CO) W O W W Wo w j a Q o g w O U �Wgwg� z — Z o w U LL. U m W E 2 z0000 =0005 O O o0 aq 0 O 00 o0 000 o00 O 0 O 0 o 0 ocoo CD* 0 0 00 0o OOo 60Lc)c o o Qt e- L e- o Ln r- r- �- o T ti N M WN L 6F} 6x} tf� 6R} 40 6% E� ER +E!} t� Ef? tf? ER V� l N! LL. m N CDO N N oo N O N ClO N N Cl N O N O O N ClO CD N 0 N Cl Cl N O 0 N O O N O O 0 N Cl N 0 N Cl N CDO N N O N Cl N N N N N N N N ca ch �000 d''t Q r- to O C 00 � m ` 0 O � m e-e- N to r�N C) w N Q w N CQ Q t'7 O m Cl0 M ch 0 co o V) O V)V) o 0 ch 0 m 0 V)V)CM O ClO M o m O W Q 0 0 z< O z W U mot- H 0it�w�0 ¢ww>v_3 Cr co) -jzOgcico m �.D� "-yj¢n>vw w F-�IL OOz}U CL zz}a� OQ�p¢�t/�m-0Z¢w0Z J i �W<w011_j w-j t�z��aC�— W jariZzz �zzoccr)Uzo5wmozzmo O¢¢¢>>O p»pwOWaW>-j —jI-- ��I'002 n'rv.¢¢gU Z ¢gU¢ 0 0 W-LoC� r-W �Qa¢00 CO) Cl z�U z oOomm � �= U� 0 ~ �� Cw Z P W P �'tm- z W z w W WOC�W� W wW Z Oz zCL w Z V u aWZ wCO)n -W OcnWpCAg-iF3 o 0(n �04(D Vwgoo OO�OH'�Ow�0 �u�O�NONa000) 0002 Oaa. OwI- z=tea IL >Q�zw5Zm5U)Z=>>� N>O LL.—p_— 0:5 _ww_O—w3OW-50w 0LWLJ 0 w U� LLia0wQ z HIxzH w =,w ap WCL0 F- W 2 W Ix owitN O a O� apt Ix 0- 0 CO > N -� CO O O ww LL. LL. 253 0 �7 I vA� INK d City of La Quinta La Quinta Police Department Captain John Horton, Commanding March 2002 Highlights (Numbers in parenthesis denotes number of calls for service that day) Friday, 03-01-02 (67): Traffic collision @ Ave 52 and Madison, (3) subjects transported to Desert Hospital with minor injuries, PCF failure to maintain a straight course of travel. Jose Anthony Romero Rivera, 09/15/74, from Cathedral City was arrested @ Wal-Mart for shoplifting and receiving stolen property. Juan Rodriguez, 01/06/80, from 914 was arrested for shoplifting @ Wal-Mart. Saturday, 03-02-02 (67): Nothing Significant Sunday, 03-03-02 (47): D.U.I. Arrest @ Washington St. Soraida Garza (36yrs / of La Quinta) was booked at Indio Jail. Her B.A.C. was .14 / .14. Dep. Leary Monday, 03-04-02 (64): Petty Theft at the 52000 block of Vallejo. A fifteen -year -old juvenile (of Thermal) stole an Air Compressor from the front of a residence. He was booked at Indio Juvenile Hall. Dep. Diaz Public Intoxication. Clarence Roger Johnson (47yrs / of La Quinta) was booked at Indio Jail. Dep. Hughes Tuesday, 03-05-02 (55): Gary Lee Torro, 07/31/60, from Oasis was arrested for carrying a concealed weapon, carrying a loaded firearm and for poss. of marijuana @ 54 and Madison. Burglary (Veh) @ 79-720 Kris Ct., rear window pried open, taken was a stereo and garage door opener. Vehicle theft and burglary @ 79-514 Dandelion, taken were (3) motorcycles and a pickup; garage door was open and the truck in the driveway was unlocked with ignition keys in all vehicles. (Victim was warned last week by deputies about leaving his garage door open) Traffic collision @ Washington north of Ave 48, 3 car T/C PCF unsafe speed. Petty theft @ 54-505 Ave. Diaz, taken were (2) Cacti Petty theft @ 52-719 Ave. Velasco, taken was a rainbow colored fish mailbox. Vehicle theft @ a construction site at Via Estrella and Mission Hills Burglary (Veh) @ 52-435 Eisenhower, victim saw BMJ with his arm inside the rear window of the vehicle, taken was a day planner, credit cards and family photos. Wednesday, 03-06-02 (47): Vehicle theft @ the 52000 block of Ave. Ramirez occurred between 03/05/02, 2330 hrs, and 03/06/02, 0730 hours. Thursday, 03-07-02 (69): Vehicle theft @ the 52000 block of Ave Rubio, vehicle locked in front of residence. Terrorist threats @ the 51000 block of Herrera, husband breaks items within house with a baseball bat then threatens wife. Friday, 03-08-02 (80): Traffic collision @ Ave 52 and Madison, PCF failure to maintain a straight course of travel. Traffic collision @ Washington and Channel Dr., PCF failure to pursed on a green light and unsafe speed. Mentally disabled person @ the 49000 block of Balada Ct., Kristine Crabtree, 03/25/66, threaten suicide. Saturday, 03-09-02 (57): D.U.I. Arrest @ Ave. 52 X Washington. Yesina Johnson (22yrs / of Indio) was booked at Indio Jail. Dep. Sabo D.U.I. Non -Injury Collision @ Calle Tampico X Park. Pedro Amaya (21yrs) and his passenger, Fredrico Meza (20yrs) were booked at Indio Jail for D.U.I. and public intoxication. Dep. Ervin Shoplift at Wal-Mart. A 17year old juvenile was arrested and released to his parents after stealing a wallet and eight DVD's. Dep. Farley Sunday, 03-10-02 (42): Shoplift @ Wal-Mart. Victor Aguilar (25yrs / of Coachella) was booked at Indio Jail for theft with priors and possession of .3 grams of methamphetamine. Dep.Eckhardt Monday, 03-11-02 (53): Shoplift @ Wal-Mart. Victor Aguilar (25yrs / of Coachella) was booked at Indio Jail for theft with priors and possession of .3 grams of methamphetamine. Dep.Eckhardt Tuesday, 03-12-02(57) Arrested Dominguez, David (29yrs / of indio) for vehicle theft, while working county beat Went to assist La Quinta units on a APR broadcast of a vehicle theft. Observed vehicle entering Stater Brothers parking lot. Petty theft (vehicle) at the 78000 block of W. Harland Dr. occurred between 031102/1930 and 031202/0530. Items stolen were 2 yellow Motorola 2-way radios, one black Motorola 2-way and a garage door opener. No suspect info. Dep. Eckhardt Traffic collision @ intersection of Eisenhower and Montezuma. Primary collision fact stop sign violation. Karen Riley (120363/ of La Quinta) collided with Maria Harris (081844/ of La Quinta) after Riley ran the SB stop sign. Traffic collision @ Washington St. X Fred Waring Dr. D-1 (Irvine Meyer Greenberg / 022322), D-2 (Lisa Jean Blomental / 063050). Arrested Fernando Herrera (042163 / of La Quinta) at the 52000 block of Ave. Carranza for willful harm or injury to a child. He hit his 13-year-old son with a bamboo cane. Booked at Indio jail. This case was brought to my attention when CPS came to the school (LQMS) to talk to the victim. Dep. Brooker Arrested La Quinta Resort employee, Ugalde, Armando (020358 / of Palm Desert). Ugalde was detained by Resort security who determined that he embezzled $15,600.00 in cash over past year from resort where he has worked for 13 years. Ugalde confessed. Wednesday, 03-13-02(68)• Traffic collision (Non), @ Jefferson and Ave 50, PCF running a red turn signal. Thursday, 03-14-02 (78): Willful violation of court order @ the 52000 block of Ave. Ramirez, Zachary Todd Devoe, 05/26/69, arrested for restraining order violation Traffic collision (Non) @ Washington and Eisenhower, primary collision factor red light violation. Willful harm or injury to a child @ the 78000 block of Irwin Cir. Jesse Cota, 39 yrs, slapped his 9 yr old son on face and buttocks because of bad grades, UTL suspect for contact Traffic collision (Non) @ Eisenhower Dr and Calle Monterey, primary collision factor laned roadway. Friday, 03-15-02 (69): Burglary (Veh.) @ 78-865 Hwy I I I (Lowes), taken was a palm pilot; a detailer/buffer machine; and a small toolbox. Robbery @ Adams and Hwy 111, suspect approached victim at his vehicle, demanded victims money or he would shoot him, Suspect brandished a semi -auto hand gun, possibly a 9mm black in color. Taken was $120.00 Traffic collision @ Jefferson and Fred Waring, Primary collision factor red light violation Assault with a deadly weapon @ 78-950 Hwy I I I (Wal-Mart), Victim was security officer, and suspect (Estevan Colegio, 05/06/79) was a store employee who attempted to run over victim with his vehicle. Saturday, 03-16-02 (53): Armed Robbery @ Adams X Hwy. 111. The victim, Andre Walls ( 33yrs / of La Quinta) was in the parking lot of the Shell Gas Station when he was approached by a Hispanic Male (25-30yrs) who brandished a handgun and demanded money. Dep.Hernandez Arrest Warrant Service. Demetrio Colin (45yrs / of La Quinta) was booked at Indio Jail for a felony assault warrant. Dep. Hughes Sunday, 03-17-02 (35): Armed Robbery @ Wal-Mart. Victim Carlos Barjon (24yrs / of Indio) reported he was robbed of his wallet at gunpoint in the parking lot. Sgt. Jameson Possible Rape @ Unknown Location. The eighteen -year -old victim, after spending the night partying, was located passed out in her car in front of her residence with her pants down around her knees. She was still extremely intoxicated and said she might have been raped at an unknown location in La Quinta by a subject she knows only as spider, Dep. Speir, Monday, 03-18-02 (43): Corporal Injury to Spouse. Ishmal Vasquez (18yrs / of La Quinta) pushed and scratched his girlfriend during an argument. Dep. Burbach Felony Vandalism @ the 77000 block of Ensenada. A male and a female juvenile were arrested for destroying $14,000 worth of property at a house under construction. They were booked at Indio Juvenile Hall. Dep. Brewster, Tuesday, 03-19-02 (57): Tragic collision @ Washington and Hwy 111, Howard Hayes, 04/25/21, of 909 rear ended Sue Steding, 12/04/49 of 909, primary collision factor unsafe speed. Javier Reyes, 12/01/75, a parolee and gang member from 914, brandished a handgun in 909, when contacted and after a vehicle search deputies were UTL the weapon Darrell Flaherty, 09/07/67, of 1000 Palms arrested for public intoxication @ Washington and Hwy I I I Wednesday, 03-20-02 (42)• Grand theft, of a trencher @ Jefferson and Ave 50 taken between 1200 and 1240 hrs. Thursday, 03-21-02 (64): Petty theft @ the79000 block of (Old) Ave 52 (LQ Resort Const), taken were 150 - 200 clay tiles Hit and run @ Jefferson and Ave 48, Veh. pursuit by Motor 47 and T-66 (Dep. Irvine) thru 909, pursued vehicle rear -ends another vehicle and driver flees but is subsequently arrested, suspect - Nicholas Ayala, 21 yrs, arrested for vehicle theft (Cat. City), receiving stolen property, 2800.1 VC/ 20002 VC/ DUI. Petty theft (from unlocked vehicle) @ the 51000 block of Ave Juarez, taken was a purse with ID and $89.00 Friday, 03-22-02 (71): Luis Gonzalez, 08/25/38, from Palm Desert arrested for DUI (.08%) Isidro Rivera, 06/01/70, arrested for burglary @ 78-950 Hwy I I I (Wal-Mart) Randy Marquez, 02/05/61, arrested for spousal abuse @ the 52000 block of Ave Rubio Oscar Loera, 40 yrs arrested for DUI @ Ave 50 and Jefferson Saturday, 03-23-02 (47): D.U.I. @ Ave. 50 X Jefferson. Oscar Loera (40yrs / of La Quinta) was found passed out behind the wheel with the motor running. Dep. Hernandez Sunday, 03-24-02 (57): Shoplifting @ Wal-Mart. Ruben Vicuna (35yrs) was cited and released. Dep. Brewster Shoplifting @ Wal-Mart. Gloria Venegas (21yrs) was cited and released. Dep. Brewster Monday, 03-25-02 (52): Shoplift @ Wal-Mart. Frank Marquez (33yrs / of Indio) was taken into custody after shoplifting about $30.00 worth of merchandise, going into the restroom and hiding it in his pants. When loss prevention blocked his escape he rushed them and was wrestled to the ground. Dep. A. Smith Tuesday, 03-26-02 (44): No significant Activity Wednesday, 03-27-02 (49) Vandalism and Petty theft to a (16 unit) mailbox @ Carrie La N/O Ashley Pl. Same as above @ 45-700 Coldbrook Same as above @ 45-200 Coldbrook Thursday, 03-28-02 (61): Ruben and Alfredo Ramirez, 13-yr. old twins, from the 52000 block of Rubio, taken for mentally disabled, after stating that they would shoot themselves if they had a gun Ana Arellano, arrested for corporal punishment or injury of child @ the 52000 block of Eisenhower after hitting her (2) 10 yr. old daughters with a tree branch, first daughter was hit for going to a friends house without permission and the other for not stopping her. 15 yr. old son broke his hand after breaking down a locked door to prevent further beatings, CPS responded and placed children into protective custody Friday, 03-29-02 (69): Abel Ramirez, 11/21/63, arrested for burglary (Comm) @ Wal-Mart Burglary @ the 81000 block of Golf View (PGA West), taken were (2) refrigerators for the garage, no force Burglary & Vandalism (Resd) @ the 53000 block of Ave Carranza, entry thru window vandalized interior Grand theft @ the 54000 block of Inverness (PGA West), taken were golf clubs and bag Sexual battery @ LQHS, a 15 yr. old female advised that a 16 yr. old male classmate slapped her on her buttocks and restrained her against a wall while groping and fondling her breasts, NFI other than a first name on suspect, CC to SRO Saturday, 03-30-02 (44): Possession of Concealed Dagger. A seventeen -year -old juvenile was found in possession of a dagger during a pedestrian check at Las Vista X Villeta. Dep. Quintero Violation of Domestic Violence Restraining Order @ the 47000 block of Adams. James Smith (54yrs) was taken into custody. Dep. Hendry Psychiatric Evaluation @ the 78000 block of La Fonda. Mary Casey (44yrs) attempted to kill herself on her birthday with a knife. She was taken to Indio Mental Health. Dep. Reynolds Sunday, 03-31-02 (41): Violation of Restraining Order @ the 53000 block of Ave. Juarez. Albert Allen Hershey (32yrs / of La Quinta) was arrested. Dep. Donovan Total calls for service: 1749 Riverside County Sheriff's Department La Quinta Special Enforcement Team Monthly Report March 2002 Deputy Jimenez, Deputy Eller, Sergeant Ammons ano uepury AFtlibu UI IV The following is a summary of the Special Enforcement Team activities for March. ***************************************************************************************************** ongoing Investigations 2 Arrests/ Filings 2 Vehicle checks 10 Business Contacts 8 Investigation assists 5 Arrest Warrants Served 2 Arrest Warrants Attempted 2 Programs 2 Pedestrian Checks 8 Crime Prevention Hours 8 Bar Checks 0 Back-ups 4 Follow-ups 30 Search Warrants 0 n,n La Quinta Target Team Report Page 2 Probation Searches 1 Parole Searches 0 Meetings 0 Recovered Stolen Property 3 Citations issued 0 Surveillances 4 Property Checks 3 Civil Commitments 0 Bicycle Time 0 Training Hours 15 Illegal Drugs Seized 0 Total Mileage: 250 miles Noteworthy Accomplishments; • La Quinta Special Enforcement Team returned recovered stolen property, recovered from the ongoing burglary suppression program, to the rightful owners. • Additional patrol has been continued through the use of bicycles in the area of Washington St. and Hwy 111 to further increase law enforcement visibility. CITY of LA Q U I N TA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT March 2002* SCHOOL: LA QUINTA MIDDLE SCHOOL Deputy: Robert Brooker RSO Grant Funded Position School Session: March I't , 2002 through March 29th , 2002. HIGHLIGHTS: During this period of time I sat on the panel of SARB hearings at the DSUSD office and attended the Coachella Valley Youth intervention Team meeting. • Conducted follow-up investigations on reported runaway juveniles. • I assisted the school staff with several incidents of medical aids, inappropriate behavior and sexual harassment. • Counseled students that violated school rules, but were not violations of state law. • I conducted investigations and documented incidents of an argument between parents in the school parking lot, child abuse, truancy, possession of marijuana on school grounds, unfounded annoying and molesting a minor, attempt warrant service, an unfounded death threat and I transported twin brothers for evaluation by mental health professionals. 6 20 CITY of LA Q U I N TA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT March 2002* SCHOOL: LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL Deputy Stephen Morton HIGHLIGHTS: • One arrest for a student in possession of marijuana was referred to the YAT Team. • Five arrests for battery and fighting on school grounds were referred to the YAT Team. • Six students were released from the YAT Team after their successful completion of the probation terms. • I conducted several truancy sweeps and made three arrests for students violating the truancy ordinance. • Counseled students that violated school rules, which were not violations of state law, but serious enough to warrant discussing the incident as a preventative measure. • Assisted the school staff with several incidents of medical aids, inappropriate behavior and comments made by one student to another. • I conducted investigations and documented incidents that occurred on or off campus, to the school bus, which ranged from fights, possible sexual battery and truancy. Actual reporting period covers February 25, 2002 through March 29, 2002. a JISpeed Violations Fail to Yield urning Violations Sign Violations LA QUINTA POLICE MOTORCYCLE ACTIVITY REPORT PROGRAM STATISTICS MARCH 2O02 51 Lane Change Violation 2 Seat Belt Violations 0 DUI Arrests 0 J Cut Traffic for Citation Prepared By: Deputy Dave Adams 33 Tows 0 Injury TIC 0 22 Non -Injury T/C 67 Suspended DL IlSignal Light Violations 1 15 Cut Traffic for Collision 0 Non -Moving 1 12 _J Child Seat Violations 3 Warnings 1 17 Fatal T/C 0 HIGHLIGHTS NO SIGNIFICANT ITEMS TO REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH. 2G5- Riverside County Sheriff's Department EXPLORER POST 503 PROGRAM REPORT MARCH 2O02 Explorer Post 503 Explorers earned the Riverside County Sheriffs Department Community Service Award. This award was presented to Post 503 by Sheriff Larry Smith and Sheriff -Elect Bob Doyle on March 24 during the Riverside County Sheriffs Department Commendation and Awards Ceremony in Riverside. Regular training meetings were held on March 5, 12, 19, and 26. The training meetings covered the following topics to prepare for the upcoming 2002 Colorado River Explorer Competition: 1) Building search instruction and practice, 2) Marijuana field raid training, 3) Physical training, 4) Tug-of-war practice, and 5) Driving under the influence investigations. Deputy Frank Gonzalez and Retired Deputy Luis Bautista coordinated the marijuana field raid training. Jennifer Richards, Riverside County Sheriffs Department Crime Analyst, handled the tug-of-war training. Explorer Post 503 Captain Andres Martinez led the driving under the influence investigations class and physical training. Some Explorer Post 503 Explorers volunteered and did at great job at the following events: 1) Shoulder tap program (March 8), 2) Search and Rescue Rodeo (March 9 and 10), and 3) City of Coachella clean up day (March 16). 2 6 3N limKirl CITY OF LA QUINTA FEBRUARY CRIME COMPARISONS C'I jME FEBRUARY 2002 FEBRUARY 2001 YTD (02) YTD (01) *HOMICIDE 0 0 0 1 *RAPE 1 0 1 2 SEX CRIMES (FEL) 0 0 1 0 SEX CRIMES MISD 1 1 1 2 ROBBERY 2 0 4 0 ASSAULT (FEL) 10 5 24 9 ASSAULT ISD 13 14 29 28 BURGLARY 44 48 108 102 *VEHICLE THEFT 10 7 22 13 *THEFT FEL 19 15 55 32 THEFT MISD 44 30 93 70 VANDALISM ISD 24 18 42 39 DOM. VIOLENCE 10 12 23 23 NARCOTICS 7 11 20 24 DUI 11 8 21 11 T/C NON -INJURY 40 41 86 64 T/C INJURY 8 4 9 7 T/C FATAL 0 0 0 2 TRAFFIC CITATIONS 371 314 677 644 * STATISTICS INCLUDE ATTEMPTS 26 F� z l< CL N O O N W D m W W " U o a O Q w Z U C�1 Q O o O 0 O O Co LO q tM N E L w 9 w 0 U M r N N O r 0 r- 01) N o 0 I r N r r 0 00 � O 00 IT 04 IR U- H U- w w F- ui m m LL J N a w In m LL w 2 W XU W n N � O O 00 N N m m W W LL LL 1 0. LO tt' O ul O O M O o O O -/ EM t.� N C�? w w 0 w C) w J w J w J 8 N Q w w 0 U J _Q z w 0 55 w w Ln O H Z W FMW a w 0 a J N O O N Q D w m w LL z 0 D m LL �LO w } �C', Uin N N U.) O e co LL Q ..o � o LL N W r' F- N T- O O 00 N N m m W W LL U. 1 0 U Q z v z co d' N O Co (0 IT N re-- k� v CO J Q U J C 1 0 0 o a a a a o L o U o LO o LO M M N N T- T- n �M N O O N Q m w U. U Q U LL LL_ 9 - LL_ 0 z 0 co CL 2 0 U N r- o O 00 N N m m W W LL LL 1 01 O d- 00 r O d' r CM O O O O O i z 0 z U F- z O F- U V LL LL 9 F- O !) ►-• - i•- CITY OF LA QUINTA DISPATCH INFORMATION / FEBRUARY 2002 TYPE OF CALL RESPONSE TIME (MINUTES) NUMBER OF INCIDENTS EMERGENCY 0 0 ROUTINE 8.9 830 *STATS TAKEN FROM RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF DATA WAREHOUSE RESPONSE TIME REPORT T4tyl, 4 4QUA rw AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE. April 16, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: Continued Public Hearing to Certify Environmental Assessment 2001-417 (Revised) and Approve Tentative Tract Map 30092 Amendment #1, A Request to Subdivide 38.4 Acres into 130 Single Family Lots Located at the Northwest Corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street Applicant: Barton Properties, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: / Continue the public hearing to May 21, 2002, to allow the applicant time to obtain the authorization of the property owner and provide the requested additional information, to process the requested Amendment to Tentative Tract Map 30092. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: City Council Review On February 5, 2002, the City Council, on a 3-0 vote, continued review of this project to March 5, 2002, to allow the applicant time to consider making design changes to the proposed subdivision map, such as adding curvilineal streets, on -street parking and internal open space (Attachment 1) . On March 4, 2002, a letter was received from the property owner indicating they had withdrawn their authority to process the map on their property (Attachment 2). 2�7 On March 5, 2002, the City Council continued the report based upon the applicant's/ engineer's requests to April 16, 2002 (Attachment 3). In addition, a letter was received from John Wallace, attorney for Barton Properties on March 5, 2002 (Attachment 4), expressing his opinion on the lack of the property owner's signature on the application and the City's process in regard to the application. On March 18, 2002, a letter was faxed to the applicant requesting the property owner's signature on the amended application (Attachment 5). A fax response was received the same day from the applicant indicating that since the City had not deemed the application incomplete within the 30-day review period, and a public hearing had been held on the Amendment, the applicant had the right to believe the property owner's signature on the original application held true for the Amendment and no further signatures should be required (Attachment 6). On April 9, 2002, a letter was sent to the applicant requesting the application be supplemented and corrected by obtaining the property owner's signature and consent (Attachment 7). A response has not been received at the time this report was finalized. Property History The vacant property, located at the northwest corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street, was annexed into the City on November 30, 2001. On July 3, 2001, the City Council certified a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approved a 97-lot residential subdivision for this property by adoption of Resolutions 2001-91 and 2001-92, allowing typical lot sizes of 1 10' wide by 1 19' long (13,090 square feet) fronting onto private streets with site access occurring on Avenue 58 and emergency only access allowed on Monroe Street (Attachment 8). Project Request This Map Amendment proposes 130 single family lots on private streets measuring 36 feet wide (curb to curb), an increase of 33 lots over the original plan. Typical lot sizes are 70' wide by 121.5' long (8,505 square feet). Project access, via private street connections, occurs on Avenue 58 and Monroe Street (Attachment 9). Access gating on Street Lot "J," where it intersects with Monroe Street, is restricted to emergency use only, while Avenue 58 access is for residents and guests. The internal street system design has been revised so that cul-de-sac streets are on the west half of the development while interconnecting through streets serve approximately 70 percent of the proposed lots. Other project changes are the elimination of clubhouse facilities and the relocation of the retention basin to the perimeter of the project (Lot 131). A CVWD well site (Lot 132) and temporary lift station (Lot 49) are sited at two locations on Monroe Street. 2'r 002 Parkway Lots "A" through "C" on the tract's south and east boundary are being established for landscaping, meandering sidewalks and a multi -use trail as required by the General Plan Circulation Element and Subdivision Ordinance. Easements for utility improvements are shown on the Map exhibit as well, including 10-foot wide easements on each side of all private streets. Planning Commission Review On January 8, 2002, the Planning Commission, on a 5-0 vote, adopted Resolutions 2002-004 and 2002-005, recommending to the City Council certification of a Mitigated' Negative Declaration and approval of Tentative Tract Map 30092 Amendment #1, subject to findings and conditions (Attachment 10). Public Notice This project was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on January 23, 2002, and mailed to all property owners within 500-feet of the site. To date, no comments have been received from adjacent property owners. Any written comments received will be handed out at the meeting. Agency Comments A copy of this request has been sent to all applicable public agencies and City Departments. All written comments received are on file with the Community Development Department. Applicable comments received have been included in the recommended Conditions of Approval. Conclusion Since the February 5th Council meeting, no design changes have been made to the proposed subdivision map. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Continue the public hearing to May 21, 2002, to allow the applicant time to obtain the authorization of the property owner and provide the requested additional information, to process the requested Amendment to Tentative Tract Map 30092; or 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to deny the Amendment to Tentative Tract Map 30092; or 3. Approve the Planning Commission recommendation: A. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to certify a Mitigated Negative 2 ►i Declaration of Environmental Impact (EA 2001-417, Revised); and L� - 003 B. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to approve Tentative Tract Map 30092 Amendment #1, subject to findings and conditions; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, r Herpan munity Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. February 5, 2002 City Council Minutes (Excerpt) 2. March 4, 2002 property owner letter 3. March 5, 2002 City Council Minutes (Excerpt) 4. John Wallace letter of March 5, 2002 5. City letter of March 18, 2002 6. Applicant's response letter of March 18, 2002 7. City letter of April 9, 2002 8. Approved Tract Map Exhibit 9. Proposed Tract Map Exhibit 10. January 8, 2002, Planning Commission Minutes (Excerpt) 604 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30092, AMENDMENT #1 CASE NO.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-417, REVISED APPLICANT: BARTON PROPERTIES, INC. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 51h day of February, 2002, 51h day of March, 2002, and 16th day of April, 2002, hold duly noticed Public Hearings for Environmental Assessment 2001-417 for Tentative Tract Map 30092 (Amendment #1) located at the northwest corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street, more particularly described as follows: Assessor's Parcel No.: 761-720-020 Southwest 1 /4 of Section 22, T6S, R7E, SBBM WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 11 th day of December, 2001, and 8th day of January, 2002, hold duly noticed Public Hearings for Environmental Assessment 2001-417 for Tentative Tract Map 30092 (Amendment #1) and on a 5-0 vote, adopted Resolution 2002-004 recommending certification to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 3d day of July, 2001, adopt Resolution 2001-91 certifying Environmental Assessment 2001-417 for TTM 30092, a 97-lot single family subdivision with private streets in a RL Zoning District; and WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study (EA 2001-417, Revised) and has determined that although the proposed residential development could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because appropriate mitigation measures were made a part of the assessment and included in the conditions of approval and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed; and WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to certify said Environmental Assessment: 2 -� 05 Resolution No. 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-417 for TTM 30092, Amendment #1 Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 2 1. The proposed Tentative Tract Map Amendment will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2001-417. 2. The proposed Tentative Tract Map Amendment will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 4. The proposed Tentative Tract Map Amendment does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. 5. The proposed Tentative Tract Map Amendment will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. 6. The proposed Tentative Tract Map Amendment will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 8. The City Council has considered the Environmental Assessment 2001-417 and the Environmental Assessment reflects the independent judgment of the City. 9. The City has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). P:\BETTY\EAccResoTM 30092#1.wpd Resolution No. 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-417 for TTM 30092, Amendment #1 Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 3 10. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitutes the findings of the City Council for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby certify Environmental Assessment 2001-417 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist on file in the Community Development Department and as attached as Exhibit "A" . 3. That Environmental Assessment 2001-417 reflects the independent judgment of the City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16th day of April, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 2 007 P:\l3ETTY\EAccResoTM30092# 1.wpd EXHIBIT A 0 f REVISED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-417 1. Project Title: TTM 30092 (Barton Properties) 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Greg Trousdell 760-777-7125 4. Project Location: NW Corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe St. 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Barton Properties, 11611 San Vicente Blvd., S-605, Los Angeles, CA 90049 (310-826-4658) 6. General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential 7. Zoning: Low Density Residential 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Original application involved development of 97 single family and common lots on 37 acres at the northwest corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street. Application has been modified to include 130 residential lots of about 8,000 square feet each. The application also includes lettered lots for streets, a well, and a retention basin. 9. Surrounding Lane Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings. North: Vacant (previously agriculture) South: Across Ave. 58, date palm grove and residential East: Across Monroe St., vacant and scattered residential West: IID Corporate facility 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) 28 x 0Q8 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\8artonCk1st.WPD 1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use Planning Mineral Resources Noise Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings U Geology and Soils U Population and Housing Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared 11 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the pro ect have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 0 I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. 0 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, Including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. ,t L) 1214101 Signature UdLU CH41,1 �� l� `� CITY OF LA QUINTA 2 8 Ante ame G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCkist:WPD Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analysis are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The analysis of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance 2 8 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses�BartonCklst.WPD 3 C, Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (General Plan Exhibit CIR-5) b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (General Plan EIR, page 5-12 ff.) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials) AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES:. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Dept. Of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29, 5-32) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (Aerial photographs) III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact X X X X X X X X 011. GAWPDOMEnv Asses\BartonCklst.WPD 4 • • c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Application materials) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Application materials) IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a► Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) c) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) Either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (La Quinta Municipal Code; General Plan) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) In KI X X X X X X X G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD 5 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? ("Historical/ Archaeological Resources Survey Report," CRM Tech, 10/18/2000 and Phase 1 Report by A.A.G. dated April 2001. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resources (i.e., an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? ("Historical/ Archaeological Resources Survey Report," CRM Tech, 10/18/2000 and Phase 1 Report by A.A.G. dated April 2001.) c) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? ("Paleontological Resources Assessment Report, CRM Tech, 10/19/2000 and Phase 1 Report by A.A.G. dated April 2001.) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ("Historical/ Archaeological Resources Survey Report," CRM Tech, 10/18/2000 and Phase 1 Report by A.A.G. dated April 2001.) VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.2-3, page 4-35 and Sladden Geotechnical Report dated 2-9-2001) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (General Plan EIR, page 4- 30 ff. and Sladden Geotechnical Report dated 2-9-2001) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff. and Sladden Geotechnical Report dated 2-9-2001) iv) Landslides? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) X X X X X X X X X Of) 0 013 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD • E c) Be located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff. and Sladden Geotechnical Report dated 2-9-2001) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-32) VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Application Materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Application Materials) c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Application Materials) d) Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Riverside County Hazardous Materials Listing) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip; would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-11) h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildlands fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD �) ,1) 04 VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-26, 6-27) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (General Plan EIR, page 4-57 ff. and Hacker Engineering Drainage Report for TTM 30092) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR, page 4- 59 ff. and Hacker Engineering Drainage Report for TTM 30092) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on - or off -site? (General Plan EIR, page 4-59 ff. and Hacker Engineering Drainage Report for TTM 30092) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems to control? (General Plan EIR, page 4-59 ff. and Hacker Engineering Drainage Report for TTM 30092) f) Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-13 ) g) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-13) IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Project Description) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local costal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purposes of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan Land Use Element) G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD X X X X X X X X X 015 rA X1. X11. • c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-5) MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29) NOISE: Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-157 ff. and Noise Impact Report prepared by P.A. Penardi and Assoc. dated 4-4-01) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?(General Plan EIR, p. 4-157 ff.) c) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-157 ff.) d) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Application Materials) e) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive levels? (General Plan map) POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) ? (General Plan, page 2-14) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) X X X X X X 9 G:\WPD04CS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD 9 0 1 XI11. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff. ) Police protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff. ) Schools? (General Plan MEA, page 4-9 ff. ) Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA, page 4-14 ff. ) XIV. RECREATION: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application Materials) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application Materials) XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-126 ff.) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-126 ff.) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (Application Materials) d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-126 ff.) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Application Materials) X X X X X X rJ G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD 10 017 • E f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Application Materials) g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Application Materials) XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24 ) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, page 4-27) d) Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, page 4- 20) e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, page 4-20) f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?(General Plan MEA, page 4-28) XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? X X X X X X X F. R. 018 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD 11 • • c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVIII. EARLIER Analysis. *1 Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. Environmental Assessments prepared for the County of Riverside were used in reviewing the potential impacts of the proposed project. These include: PP15672, Fast Track #98-39; TTM 29316 & 29317; Environmental Assessment No. 37276, Amd. No 1. City EA 2001-408 covers this site and 240 acres to the north. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. See attached Addendum. SOURCES: Master Environmental Assessment, City of La Quinta General Plan 1992; SCAQMD CEQA Handbook; General Plan, City of La Quinta, 1992; Paleontological Lakebed Delineation Map, City of La Quinta; City of La Quinta Municipal Code; "Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report," prepared by CRM Tech, October 18, 2000; "Paleontological Resources Assessment Report," prepared by CRM Tech, October 19, 2000; "Phase 1 Archaeological/Historic Resources Assessment for TTM 3009211, prepared by Archaeological Advisory Group, April 2001; "Noise Report #01106 for TTM 30092," prepared by P.A. Penardi and Assoc., April 4, 2001; "Geotechnical Investigation for TTM 30092," prepared by Sladden Eng., Feb. 9, 200 1 ;"Preliminary Drainage Calc. - TTM 30092," prepared by Hacker Eng., April 13, 2001. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonCklst.WPD 12 Revised Addendum for Environmental Assessment 2001-417 for Tentative Tract Map 30092 Introduction This Environmental Assessment has been prepared to address changes made to Tentative Tract Map 30092. The original application was reviewed under EA 2001- 417, an environmental assessment to supplement EA 2001-408 prepared for General Plan Amendment 2001-074 and Zone Change 2001-098 (City Council Resolution 2001-34). Since the original approval and environmental review, the applicant has increased the number of residential lots from 97 to 130. II. c) The proposed parcel is not currently under Williamson Act contract. Development of the site will result in the loss of land available for agriculture. Residential subdivisions are being developed to the north of the site and the project area is an isolated parcel. Lands to the south and east continue to be farmed. The loss of this site for agriculture is not expected to be significant based on the conclusion of this assessment and EA 2001-408. Ill. a),c) &d) Air quality in the Coachella Valley and the City is primarily affected by vehicular emissions. The development of this project could generate up to 1,300 average daily trips'. These trips could generate the following emissions. The Table below also includes the SCAQMD thresholds of significance for each potential pollutant. Running Exhaust Emissions (pounds/day) PM10 PM10 PM10 c0 ROC NOx Exhaust Brakes Tires 50 mph 67.15 2.58 13.77 -- 0.29 0.29 Daily Threshold" 550 75 100 150 i Based on 1,300 trips/day and average trip length of 10.0 miles, using EMFAC7G Model provided by California Air Resources Board. Assumes catalytic light autos at 75°F. • Operational thresholds provided by SCAOMD for assistance in determining the significance of a project. "Trip Generation, 6th Edition, Volume l" prepared by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Single rt Family detached housing (210) used. ? v C) G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\BartonRevAdd.WPD 1 4 The Coachella Valley is a non -attainment area for PM10 (particulate matter of 10 microns or smaller). The non -attainment status results in potentially significant impacts associated with new development, particularly during the construction of new projects. In order to control PM10, the City has imposed standards and requirements on development to control dust. In addition to these standards, SCAQMD suggests mitigation for PM10, which are integrated into the following mitigation measures: 1. No earth moving activity shall be undertaken without the review and approval of a PM10 Management Plan. 2. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. 3. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation. 4. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 5. Cut and fill quantities will be balanced on site, unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer. 6. Any piece of land to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. 7. Watering of any portion of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an ongoing basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the, site. Any portion of the site that is actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. 8. All disturbed areas shall be treated to prevent erosion until the site is constructed upon. Pad sites which are to remain undeveloped shall be seeded with either a desert wildflower mix, grass seed or chemical stabilizers. 9. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. 10. SCAQMD Rule - 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean up of construction -related dirt on approach routes to the site. 11. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second star ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. n f y G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\ Bart onRevAdd.WPD 2 021. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, the impacts to air quality from the proposed project will not be significant. IV. a) Biological resource analysis has not been performed because the site has been actively used for farm activities and therefore is not likely to be a valuable habitat for native species. The land is not in an area of concern for known sensitive species and is outside the boundary of the Coachella Valley Fringe - toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan. The changes associated with the application will not change the potential impacts to biological resources. Impacts from development are not expected to be significant. V. a) & b) Cultural resource surveys were conducted for the subject property'. The survey found that no significant resources occur on the site. V. c) The site has been previously assessed for paleontologic resources3. The area was within the historic lakebed of ancient Lake Cahuilla, but no vertebrate remains have been located. The mollusks found are abundant in this area, and do not represent a significant resource. As such, the on -site investigation and report found that the impacts on paleontologic resources are less than significant, and that no further analysis of the site is necessary. . VI. a) i) & ii) The site is not located in any Earthquake Fault zones as designated by the State and is mapped in the Ground Shaking Zone IV. To ensure structures can withstand damage from earthquakes, compliance with the Geotechnical Investigation Report by Sladden Engineering dated February 9, 2001, and any other site specific soil analysis required by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits shall be required. This requirement will ensure that impacts from ground failure are reduced to a less than significant level. VI. a) iii) This site may be subject to liquefaction due to groundwater being found within 25 to 30 feet requiring "remedial grading including overexcavation and recompaction." (Sladden Report). The modification of the application does not 2 Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey, prepared by CRM Tech, October, 2000; Phase 1 Archaeological/Historical Survey, prepared by James Brock, MA, RPA dated April 2001. 3 Paleontolo-ical Resources Assessment Report, prepared by CRM Tech, October 2000. Environmental Assessments prepared for the County of Riverside. These include: PP15672, Fast Track n98-39; TTM 29316 & 29317; Environmental Assessment No. 37276, Amd. No 1. These analyses cover 200 of the 286 acres proposed for this project. 0 0 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\ Bart onRevAdd.WPD 3 y 022 affect this potential impact, and requires equivalent mitigation as the previous application. To develop the site, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1. Grading activities and structure development shall comply with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Investigation Report prepared by Sladden Engineering for TTM 30092 including over -excavation, and other methods known to reduce the potential for liquefaction impacts on residential structures. VIII. b) Domestic water is provided by the Coachella Valley Water District, which extracts groundwater from a number of wells in the Lower Thermal sub -basin. Development of the site will replace the use of canal water for crop irrigation and may represent a positive impact insofar as water usage may be reduced when agricultural irrigation no longer occurs on the site. The proposed amendment to the project will increase water usage over that previously analyzed. Stormwater generated by development will be retained on -site which will encourage percolation and groundwater recharge. The proposed alteration to the project does not change the City's requirements for on -site retention. Additionally, City Ordinances require water conserving plumbing fixtures and landscaping. These standards will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. VIII. c)-e) Site development of buildings and parking areas will create impermeable surfaces creating drainage pattern changes. The project site is located in a C Flood Zone. The project is required to meet the City's standards for retention of the 100-year storm on -site. The revised drainage plan, prepared by Hacker Engineering, has been reviewed by the City Engineer for compliance with Section 13.24.120 (Drainage) of the Subdivision Ordinance. Tract conditions are recommended to ensure compliance assuring the flood control system is less than significant. XI. a) The development of the area will result in increased noise levels, but these are not expected to be significant, given that the ambient noise level is, and will continue to be low. Development on any portion of the site will include landscaping, berms and walls which will further attenuate sound in the area as required by Noise Impact Report prepared by P.A. Penardi and Associates dated April 4, 2001. Amendment of the application will not change the potential impacts associated with noise. The impacts from noise are therefore not expected to be significant. �y ll •� G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\EartonRevAdd.WPD 4023 XIII. a) The proposed development will have a direct impact on public services and will be served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, acting under City contract. Site development will generate property tax which will offset the costs of added police and fire services. The project area will continue to pay the mandated school fees as development occurs. These fees mitigate the students generated, and offset the impacts to schools. The collection of property tax, and the generation of sales tax from these residents' disposable income, will generate revenues to the City to offset the added costs associated with the provision of municipal services. Builders within the project area will be required to participate in the City's Impact Fee Program, which helps to offset roadway improvement costs. The amendment of the application will not significantly change the impacts to public services. Increases in population resulting from the increased number of lots will be offset by increased revenues in property and sales tax. Site development is not expected to have a significant impact on municipal services or facilities. XV. a) The Village of the Palms project determined traffic impacts for development would be less than significant". Under EA 2001-408 (City Council Resolution No. 2001-34) it was determined that a traffic study would not be required, provided the sites were developed to comply with the LDR General Plan designation and Impact Mitigation Fees were paid. The amendment of the application will add only 330 trips per day to the regional road system. The application, as amended, still falls within the Low Density Residential land use category. The implementation of these mitigation measures will reduce the potential impacts to the circulation system to a less than significant level. XVl. a)-f) The buildout of the site will require service from utility providers. The overall impacts on these services is not expected to be significant, insofar as these suppliers will charge the residents for their services, and provide improvements to these services as needed. In addition, connection fees will be required at construction of any project. These fees and charges will mitigate the potential impacts to a less than significant level. Environmental Assessments prepared for the County of Riverside. These include: PP15672, Fast Track #98-39; TTM 29316 & 29317; Environmental Assessment No. 37276, Amd. No 1. 024 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\8ar1onRevAdd.WPD 5 0 N 0 O 00 a� 0 O i 00 Z 0 C W U O a N 0 0 cn r- �r 0 N H a V� zA a� �W ox VV 1-0 o U P. •a' U UE--4 to an cz 1.4 � 0 �7 to 0 •° •° 0 •° 4-4 a U U U U U rZ F •� o U O U W ... U .� a o O 4., CU •^, U 'F 0.� O U 0 0 to O 'd a.aa 64 a aaa c�ar�ao cl oz� � a O z z O U a0o A 64 �. a A a o to w°� UAU U U U VA Z O Q F a O •� 0 Ono ao co W h•� '� U A. o 4••� C13 N a dry ..>.r a a U 0 O CA •� Cd 0 _Cd.� W a a� .-•� � �, ,� a� 40. a > o0-4 ► �, u C� 'a a 0 2 >, ... U 025 0 W E W A q d A v c�a z ova z a�a aU aU aV W Ox UV OV U OV U b w •� cn � •� U co tw bow CO o , U Ucn U V U C d40-4 4-1 o �U �-d coi to a a co o G7 t64 o � o z o z � z cn to o o o o rA 1-4 A p., b o as .c a a a b �0 �z U z �A� AA z �. a �� a �� W a w •� �= o Ua �� UA 1-4 a 'oa� U G�UQ 0 d z � p o O a a E�En 64 o °� H 0-4 oEr °°� 04 •b U a ¢� � O� 12 a bC 0 m N N w U) U A O o CL V F A U0 zA �w ox UV W a o ►z U F W o o a a o� z zz a� A W ao b O �..i 1.. U ONO .. (� d A U0 zA �W UU U 4 o-+ H O Noa b� U � a ab C7 � 0-4 o F > -d a A a •� as o �O z A UA Q rA v� bA 1.4 z� O E d . o ILI rA •• o c a cis yC a ro 30 027 a 3 rz c O m U) 0) ca co a ,jc W U O 0 CL RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REVISED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 130 SINGLE FAMILY AND OTHER STREET, PUBLIC UTILITY AND COMMON LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 38.4 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MONROE STREET CASE: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30092, AMENDMENT #1 APPLICANT: BARTON PROPERTIES, INC. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 51h day of February, 2002, 5th day of March, 2002, and 161h day of April, 2002, hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider a request by Barton Properties for Charles and Norma Fausel for amendment to 130 single family and other miscellaneous common/utility lots on approximately 38.4 acres located at the northwest corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 11 th day of December, 2001, and 8th day of January, 2002, hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider Tentative Tract Map 30092 (Amendment #1), and on a 5-0 vote, adopted Resolution 2002-005 recommending approval to the City Council, more particularly described as: Assessor's Parcel No.: 761-720-020 Southwest 1 /4 of Section 22, T6S, R7E, SBBM WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 3rd day of July, 2001, approve Tentative Tract Map 30092, a single family development of 97 lots and other miscellaneous common lots by adoption of Resolution 2001-92, on a 5-0 vote; and WHEREAS, the Tentative Tract Map has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (City Council Resolution 83-63), in that the Community Development Department has prepared a revised Environmental Assessment for this Map Amendment. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact (EA 2001- 417) was certified by the City Council on July 3, 2001, under Resolution 2001-091. There are no changed circumstances, conditions, or new information which would trigger the preparation of a subsequent environmental assessment pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21 166; and WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Tentative Tract Map Amendment: a �I 3 1_i `.le 028 Resolution No. 2002- TTM 30092 (Amendment #1), Barton Properties Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 2 1. The proposed Tentative Tract Map Amendment is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, in that the subdivision will result in the creation of 8,500 + sq. ft. residential lots to be developed in accordance with the existing Pre -Annexation Zoning (Low Density Residential) and General Plan (Low Density Residential) designations as established. Project density is approximately 3.5 units per acre within the allowed maximum density of four dwelling units per acre. Tract access for residents is limited to 58th Avenue, a Primary Arterial thoroughfare. 2. The design and improvements for the Tentative Tract Map Amendment are consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, in that all proposed single family lots meet and exceed minimum required dimensions and sizes requirements and perimeter Arterial streets will be constructed. The design of private streets servicing the residential lots are consistent with standards as contained in the General Plan Circulation Element (Chapter 3.0) and Subdivision Ordinance (Title 13). 3. The design of the Map, and its proposed improvements, are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, or substantially and unavoidable injure fish or wildlife, or their habitat, in that the site is vacant and has been previously disturbed by farming activity, to the degree that the site itself does not support any wildlife species. 4. The design of the proposed subdivision map and related improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, in that responsible agencies have reviewed the project for these issues with no significant concerns identified. Necessary infrastructure improvements for this project are readily accessible. The health, safety and welfare of current and future residents can be assured based on the recommended conditions, which serve to implement mitigation measures for the project, including emergency only access on Monroe Street. To contain on -site stormwater, a retention basin has been proposed at the southeast corner of the project. Site grading is consistent with adjacent parcels and any on -site work will require dust control measures pursuant to Chapter 6.16 of the Municipal Code. 5. The design of, and type of improvements for, the Map will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the subdivision, as the proposed subdivision has been reviewed for these issues with no concerns identified. The Tract's design includes provisions for lot access and utility and other public easements as determined necessary during review of the proposal. Landscape lots adjacent to perimeter arterial streets will provide aesthetic and traffic noise buffers in compliance with City requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of ;- La Quinta, California as follows: 3 029 Resolution No. 2002- TTM 30092 (Amendment #1), Barton Properties Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 3 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of said City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby confirm the conclusion that Environmental Assessment 2001-417 (Revised) assessed the environmental concerns of this Map; and 3. That it does hereby approve of the above -described Tentative Tract Map 30092 (Amendment #1), for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 16th day of April, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 030 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30092 (AMENDMENT #1), BARTON PROPERTIES APRI L 16, 2002 GENERAL 1. Tentative Tract Map 30092 (Amendment #1) shall comply with the requirements and standards of § § 66410-66499.58 of the California Government Code (the Subdivision Map Act) and Title 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) unless otherwise modified by the following conditions. 2. This Map approval shall expire and become null and void on the original approval date of July 3, 2003, unless an extension of time is granted according to the requirements of Section 13.12.150 of the Subdivision Ordinance. 3. Developer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of La Quinta in the event of any legal claim or litigation arising out of the City's approval of TTM 30092 (Amendment #1) and certification of EA 2001-417 (Revised). The City of La Quinta shall have the right to select its defense counsel in its sole discretion. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 4. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit for construction of any building or use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances from the following agencies and departments: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (NPDES Permit) The applicant is responsible for any requirements of the permits or clearances from those jurisdictions. If the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of said approvals prior to obtaining City approval of the plans. G:Cond CC Tr. 30092 #1 /Greg 031. Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 2 The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit. Projects disturbing five or more acres, or smaller projects which are part of a larger project disturbing five or more acres require a project -specific NPDES permit. The applicant shall submit a copy of the CWQCB acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent (NO1) prior to issuance of a grading or site construction permit. The applicant shall ensure that the required Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (SWPPP) is available for inspection at the project site. PROPERTY RIGHTS 5. Prior to approval of a final map, the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights required of the tentative map or otherwise necessary for construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of essential improvements. 6. The applicant shall dedicate or grant public and private street right of way and utility easements in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and as required by the City Engineer. 7. Right of way dedications required of this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Avenue 58 (Primary Arterial) - 55-foot half of 1 10-foot right of way. 2) Monroe Street (Primary Arterial) - 55-foot half of 1 10-foot right of way. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Main Entry: As required for final configuration of the private gated entry as approved by the City Engineer. 2) Residential: 37-foot width. Width may be reduced to 33 feet with parking restricted to one side and 29 feet if on -street parking is prohibited provided there is adequate off-street parking for ; �.� residents and visitors and the applicant makes provisions for `� �J ongoing enforcement of the restrictions. 032 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 3 C. CULS DE SAC - Public or Private: Use Riverside County Standard 800 (symmetric) or 800A (offset) with 39.5-foot radius, or larger. 8. Right of way geometry for knuckle turns and corner cutbacks shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805 respectively unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 9. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 10. If the City Engineer determines that access rights to proposed street rights of way shown on the tentative map are necessary prior to approval of final maps dedicating the rights of way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights of way within 60 days of written request by the City. 1 1 . The applicant shall dedicate ten -foot public utility easements contiguous with and along both sides of all private streets. The easements may be reduced to five feet with the express concurrence of IID. 12. The applicant shall create perimeter setbacks along public rights of way as follows (listed setback depth is the average depth if meandering wall design is approved): A. Avenue 58 and Monroe Street (Primary Arterials) - 20 feet The setback requirement applies to all frontage including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks, multi -use trails) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall dedicate blanket easements for those purposes. 13. The applicant shall dedicate easements necessary for placement of and access to utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 14. The applicant shall vacate abutter's rights of access to public streets and properties from all frontage along the streets and properties except access points shown on the approved tentative map. 15. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements or written permission, as appropriate, from owners of any abutting properties on which grading, retaining, wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments are to occur. 10,9 16. If the applicant proposes vacation or abandonment of any existing rights of way 033 or access easements which will diminish access rights to any properties owned Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 4 by others, the applicant shall provide approved alternate rights of way or access easements to those properties or notarized letters of consent from the property owners. 17. The applicant shall cause no easements to be granted or recorded over any portion of this property between the date of approval of this tentative map by the City Council and the date of recording of any final map(s) covering the same portion of the property unless such easements are approved by the City Engineer. FINAL MAP(S) AND PARCEL MAP(S) 18. Prior to approval of a final map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete map, as approved by the City's map checker, on storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu items so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. If the map was not produced in AutoCad or a file format which can be converted to AutoCad, the City Engineer may accept raster -image files of the map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these conditions of approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 19. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and landscape architects, as appropriate. Plans shall be submitted on 24" x 36" media in the categories of "Rough Grading," "Precise Grading," "Streets & Drainage," and "Landscaping." Precise grading plans shall have signature blocks for Community Development Director and the Building Official. All other plans shall have signature blocks for the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until they are signed. "Streets and Drainage" plans shall normally include signals, sidewalks, bike paths, entry drives, gates, and parking lots. "Landscaping" plans shall normally include irrigation improvements, landscape lighting and entry monuments. "Precise Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls. Plans for improvements not listed above shall be in formats approved by the City Engineer. 034 20. The City may maintain standard plans, details and/or construction notes for Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 5 elements of construction. For a fee established by City resolution, the applicant may acquire standard plan and/or detail sheets from the City. 21. When final plans are approved by the City, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete, approved plans on storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu items so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. At the completion of construction and prior to final acceptance of improvements, the applicant shall update the files to reflect as -constructed conditions. If the plans were not produced in AutoCad or a file format which can be converted to AutoCad, the City Engineer may accept raster -image files of the plans. GRADING 22. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall furnish written acknowledgment from CWQCB of receipt of applicants Notice of Intent (NOI). 23. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall furnish a preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report and an approved grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer. The grading plan shall conform with the recommendations of the soils report and be certified as adequate by a soils engineer or engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on final maps (if any are required of this development) that a soils report has been prepared pursuant to Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code. 24. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 25. The applicant shall endeavor to minimize differences in elevation at abutting properties and between separate tracts and lots within this development. Building pad elevations on contiguous lots shall not differ by more than three feet except for lots within a tract or parcel map, but not sharing common street frontage, where the differential shall not exceed five feet. The limits given in this condition and the previous condition are not entitlements and more restrictive limits may be imposed in the map approval or plan checking process. If compliance with the limits is impractical, however, the City will 3 r consider alternatives which minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties U 3 J and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 6 26. Prior to occupation of the project site for construction purposes, the applicant shall submit and receive approval of a fugitive dust control plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. The Applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the city, in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the provisions of the permit. 27. The applicant shall maintain graded, undeveloped land to prevent wind and water erosion of soils. The land shall be planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. 28. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide building pad certifications stamped and signed by qualified engineers or surveyors. For each pad, the certification shall list the approved elevation, the actual elevation, the difference between the two, if any, and pad compaction. The data shall be organized by lot number and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 29. Depending on the timing of development of the lots or parcels created by this map and the status of off -site improvements at that time, the subdivider may be required to construct improvements, to construct additional improvements subject to reimbursement by others, to reimburse others who construct improvements that are obligations of this map, to secure the cost of the improvements for future construction by others, or a combination of these methods. In the event that any of the improvements required herein are constructed by the City, the Applicant shall, at the time of approval of a map or other development or building permit, reimburse the City for the cost of those improvements. 30. The applicant shall construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations, or furnish an executed, secured agreement to construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations required by the City prior to approval of a final map or parcel map or issuance of a certificate of compliance for a waived parcel map. For secured agreements, security provided, and the release thereof, shall conform with Chapter 13, LQMC. Improvements to be made or agreed to shall include removal of any existing structures or obstructions which are not part of the proposed improvements. 31. If improvements are secured, the applicant shall provide estimates of improvement costs for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Estimates 31,9 OW 03d Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 7 shall comply with the schedule of unit costs adopted by City resolution or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's schedule, estimates shall meet the approval of the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies. Security is not required for telephone, gas, or T.V. cable improvements. However, development -wide improvements shall not be agendized for final acceptance until the City receives confirmation from the telephone authority that the applicant has met all requirements for telephone service to lots within the development. 32. If improvements are phased with multiple final maps or other administrative approvals (e.g., Site Development Permits), off -site improvements and common improvements (e.g., retention basins, perimeter walls & landscaping, gates) shall be constructed or secured prior to approval of the first phase unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each phase shall be completed and satisfied prior to completion of homes or occupancy of permanent buildings within the phase and subsequent phases unless a construction phasing plan is approved by the City Engineer. 33. If the applicant fails to construct improvements or satisfy obligations in a timely manner or as specified in an approved phasing plan or in an improvement agreement, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. DRAINAGE 34. Applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as required by the State NPDES General Construction Permit. 35. Applicant's SWPPP shall be approved prior to any on or off site grading being done in relation to this project. 36. Applicant's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan shall include provisions for all of the following BMPs: A. Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). B. Temporary Sediment Control. C. Wind Erosion Control. D. Tracking Control. �a E. Non -Storm Water Management. F. Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. 037 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 8 37. All of applicant's erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be approved prior to any on or off site grading being done in relation to this project. 38. All project BMPs shall be maintained throughout the course of construction, and until all improvements have been accepted by the City. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03 and the following: 39. Stormwater falling on site during the peak 24-hour period of a 100-year storm (the design storm) shall be retained within the development unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. 40. Stormwater shall normally be retained in common retention basins. Individual - lot basins or other retention schemes may be approved by the City Engineer for lots 2.5 acres in size or larger or where the use of common retention is impracticable. If individual -lot retention is approved, the applicant shall meet the individual -lot retention provisions of Chapter 13.24, LQMC. 41. Storm flow in excess of retention capacity shall be routed through a designated, unimpeded overflow outlet to the historic drainage relief route. 42. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be retained on site or passed through to the overflow outlet. 43. Retention facility design shall be based on site -specific percolation data which shall be submitted for checking with the retention facility plans. The design percolation rate shall not exceed two inches per hour. 44. Retention basin slopes shall not exceed 3:1. Maximum retention depth shall be five feet for common basins and two feet for individual -lot retention. 45. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. In residential developments, nuisance water shall be disposed of in a trickling sand filter and leachfield approved by the City Engineer. The sand filter and leachfield shall be designed to contain surges of 3 gph/1,000 sq. ft. (of landscape area) and infiltrate 5 gpd/1,000 sq. ft. 46. In developments for which security will be provided by public safety entities (e.g., the La Quinta Safety Department or the Riverside County Sheriff's 314 Department), retention basins shall be visible from adjacent street(s). No fence or wall shall be constructed around basins unless approved by the Community 03.E Development Director and the City Engineer. Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 9 47. If the applicant proposes discharge of stormwater directly or indirectly to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, the applicant shall indemnify the City from the costs of any sampling and testing of the development's drainage discharge which may be required under the City's NPDES Permit or other City - or area -wide pollution prevention program, and for any other obligations and/or expenses which may arise from such discharge. The indemnification shall be executed and furnished to the City prior to issuance of any grading, construction or building permit and shall be binding on all heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors in interest in the land within this tentative map excepting therefrom those portions required to be dedicated or deeded for public use. The form of the indemnification shall be acceptable to the City Attorney. If such discharge is approved for this development, the applicant shall make provisions in the CC&R's for meeting these potential obligations. 48. The tract shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. UTILITIES 49. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within the right of way and all aboveground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electrical vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 50. Existing aerial lines within or adjacent to the proposed development and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground, unless otherwise allowed by General Plan Amendment 2000-073. Power lines exceeding 34.5 Kv are exempt from this requirement. 51. Utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing, improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of trench compaction for approval of the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 31 52. The applicant shall install the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. (Public street improvements shall conform with the City's General Plan in effect at the time of construction.) 039 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 10 A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Avenue 58 (Primary Arterial) - Construct 43-foot half of 86-foot improvement (measured curb face to curb face) plus 6-foot meandering sidewalk. Applicant shall construct a landscaped half median, unless otherwise determined by the City Engineer. 2) Monroe Street (Primary Arterial) - Construct 43-foot half of 86- foot improvement (measured curb face to curb face) plus 6-foot meandering sidewalk. Applicant shall construct a landscaped half median, unless otherwise determined by the City Engineer. 3) Developer shall enter into a secured agreement for the deferred installation of a traffic signal at the main entrance off Avenue 58 at such time that signal warrants are met. Developer shall pay its fair share based on an "after the fact" traffic study. Developer may assign secured agreement to the HOA. Signalized intersection costs to be divided based on percentages of use to the participating developments. B. PRIVATE STREETS - Residential: 36-foot travel width. Width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one side and 28 feet with on -street parking prohibited if there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors and the applicant provides for perpetual enforcement of the restrictions by the homeowners association. C. CULS DE SAC - Use Riverside County Standard 800 (symmetric) or 800A (offset) with 38-foot curb radius. D. MULTI -USE TRAIL - The applicant shall construct a multi -use trail along Monroe Street and Avenue 58 frontages within the required 32-foot wide setback. The location and design of the trail shall be approved by the City. A split rail fence shall be constructed to separate the multi -use trail from the pedestrian sidewalk and perimeter wall in accordance with Section 9.140.060 (Item E, 3a) of the Zoning Ordinance. The multi -use trail, trail signs, and the split rail fence shall be completed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the first residence. Bonding for the fence to be installed shall be posted prior to final map approval. A Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, turn knuckles, corner cutbacks, f L bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, and other features contained in the approved construction plans may warrant additional street widths as determined by the City Engineer. 040 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 11 53. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 54. The applicant may be required to extend improvements beyond development boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 55. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC, adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, and as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 56. Knuckle turns and corner cutbacks shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805 respectively unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 57. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations which convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue for street sweeping. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be vertical (1/8" batter) and a minimum of 0.1' in height. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to normal curbing prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 58. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using Caltrans' design procedure (20-year life) and site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows (or approved equivalents for alternate materials): Residential Collector Secondary Arterial Primary Arterial Major Arterial 3.0" a.c./4.50" c.a.b. 4.011/5.00" 4.0"/6.00" 4.5"/6.0011 5.511/6.5011 59. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 31 041 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 12 60. The City will conduct final inspections of homes and other habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the tract or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. 61. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Avenue 58 (Primary Arterial) - No turning restriction. B. Emergency Access on Monroe Street - No public access allowed; left turns are restricted. LANDSCAPING 62. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots, landscape setback areas and medians shall be prepared by a landscape architect and be prepared based on the water conservation measures in Chapter 8.13 of the Municipal Code. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be approved by the Community Development Department. The plans are not approved for construction until they have been approved and signed by the Coachella Valley Water District and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner. 63. The applicant shall provide landscaping in required setbacks, retention basins, and common lots. 64. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit plans for approval by the Community Development Department prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking is complete, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner prior to submitting for signature by the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 65. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the 042 requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 13 66. The developer and subsequent property owner shall continuously maintain all required landscaping in a healthy and viable condition as required by Section 9.60.240 (E3) of the Zoning Ordinance. PUBLIC SERVICES 67. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by Sunline Transit and approved by the City Engineer. QUALITY ASSURANCE 68. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures which meet the approval of the City Engineer. 69. The applicant shall employ or retain qualified civil engineers, geotechnical engineers, surveyors, or other appropriate professionals to provide sufficient construction supervision to be able to furnish and sign accurate record drawings. 70. The applicant shall arrange and bear the cost of measurement, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program but required by the City as evidence that construction materials and methods comply with plans, specifications and applicable regulations. 71. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were signed by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the CAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City to reflect as -constructed conditions. MAINTENANCE 72. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks (except for multi -use trails). The applicant shall maintain required public improvements until expressly released from this responsibility by the appropriate public agency. FEES AND DEPOSITS 319 043 73. The applicant shall pay the City's established fees for plan checking and Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 14 construction inspection. Fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan checking and permits. 74. Prior to approval of a final map or completion of any approval process for modification of boundaries of the property or lots subject to these conditions, the applicant shall process a reapportionment of any bonded assessment(s) against the property and pay the cost of the reapportionment. 75. The developer shall pay school mitigation fees to the Coachella Valley Unified School District based on their requirements. Fees shall be paid prior to building permit issuance by the City. 76. Provisions shall be made to comply with the terms and requirements of the City's adopted Infrastructure Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. 77. Prior to final map approval, parkland fees shall be paid as required by Section 13.48 of the Subdivision Ordinance. 78. The property owner/developer shall submit to the Community Development Department a check made out to the County of Riverside in the amount of $64 to permit the filing and posting of EA 2001-417 (Revised) after the City Council's review. FIRE DEPARTMENT 79. Approved standard fire hydrants, located at each street intersection and spaced not more than 330 feet apart with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1,000 g.p.m. for a 2-hour duration at 20 psi. 80. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in the middle of streets directly in line with fire hydrants. 81. Gates entrances shall be at least two feet wider than the width of the travel lanes. Any gate providing access from a road to a driveway shall be located at least 35'-0" setback from the roadway and shall open to allow a vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic on the road. Where one way road with a single traffic lane provides access to a gate entrance, a 40-foot turning radius shall be used. 82. Gates, if any, shall be equipped with a rapid entry system (KNOX). Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Gate pins shall be rated with a shear pin force, not to exceed 30 pounds. Gates activated 044 Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 15 by the rapid entry system shall remain open until closed by the rapid entry system. 83. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. 84. The applicant or developer shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. 85. The minimum dimension for access roads is 20 feet clear and unobstructed width and a minimum clearance of 13'-6" in height. MISCELLANEOUS 86. All public agency letters received for this case are made part of the case file documents for plan checking purposes. 87. All mitigation measures included in Environmental Assessment 2001-417 (Revised) are hereby included in this approval. 88. Separate pedestrian gates shall be provided at each site access location. 89. Prior to submitted the Final Map for plan check consideration, the following corrections and/or information shall be provided: A. Lots 131 (retention basin) and 132 (well site) shall be designated as lettered lots. B. Two copies of the draft Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC and R's). The City Attorney shall approve the document prior to approval of the final map by the City Council. C. A minimum of three street names shall be submitted for each private street shown on the Map exhibit. A list of the names in ranking order shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for approval. D. Bureau of Reclamation easements that traverse the project site shall be 3 disclosed. G 4 J E. No permanent improvements may be constructed within the 50-foot easement area of the Avenue 58 agricultural drain or the 10-foot Resolution No. 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended TTM 30092, Amendment #1, Barton Prop. Adopted: April 16, 2002 Page 16 easement area of lateral 123.45-0.75 without the written consent of the Coachella Valley Water District. 04d ATTACHMENT #1 City Council Minutes 18 February 5, 2002 RESOLUTION NO. 2002-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AP VING A STREET NAME CHANGE FOR KIRK COURT TO CORAL MOUNT COURT (STREE2 CHANGE 2001-013 - DR. BRUCE BAUMANN.) It was move by SWOff-Members t h/Hen to adopt soluti No. 2002-13 as fitted. Motion c imously with ember Perkins and Mayor Pena ABSENT. 5. PUBLIC HEARING TO CERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-417 AND APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30092, AMENDMENT NO. 1; A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 38.4 ACRES INTO 130 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MONROE STREET. APPLICANT: BARTON PROPERTIES, INC. The Mayor Pro Tem declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN at 8:17 p.m. Planning Manager di lorio presented the staff report. Council Member Adolph expressed appreciation for the landscape setbacks at Avenue 58 and Monroe Street but voiced concern about the lack of visitor parking in the cul-de-sacs. Community Development Director Herman advised the City Code does not address that issue and added driveways will accommodate a minimum of two vehicles. There being no other requests to speak, the Mayor Pro Tern declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 8:23 p.m. Council Member Henderson commented on the density of the project and lack of open space and stated she also has a problem with the lack of parking. She suggested sending the project back to the developer for redesign. After a brief discussion, Council concurred to continue this item to give staff an opportunity to work with the developer to address the issues of lot design, parking, and street configuration. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Henderson/Adolph to continue the public hearing for Tentative Tract Map 30092 for Barton Properties, Inc. to 3 �) Iv � March 5, 2002. Motion carried unanimously with Council Member Perkins and Mayor Pena ABSENT. 048 Mar 04 02 06:39P Deoe Harris Sherman mar 04 00 06:11p Debbie Harris 6her•man March 4.2002 Jerry Herman Director of Conununity Development CITY OF LA QUINTA La Quinta, Califomia (760036 ATTACHMENT 2 «W) -aso_ 1W.I Re: Tuntative Tract Map -8.4 ncrce lam` Corncr Monme & Ave. 58 Dcar Mr. Herman: We understand that the tentative tract MaP for perool number 761-720-020 (the "Property") filed by Bartcai Pmpertiea, Inc. ("Barton") will be considered by the City of La Quinta City Council in its session on the evening of March S, 2002. As you know, we are the owners of the Property as 'trustees of the Charles E. F=cl and Norma J. Fausci Revocable Trust Dated May Z3, 1997. we further understand fium the city attorneys office, once the tentative tract reap is approved, the final tram reap is a mere ministerial function end that we would not lac able to prevent it from being recorded against the Property. As you know, Barton had tiled suit against us seeking to enforce its alleged right to purchase the Property. Barton also recorded a Lis Pendens against the !property. The Riverside County Superior Coaft, however, ordered the Lis Peadena expunged and expressly found that Barron had not established a valid claim as to the Property, The Cohn funher found that Baron had failed to establish the probable validity of its alleged claim. As such, the Lis Pendens was expunged and the expungcrosnt was recorded with the Rivcrside County Recorder's Office. Accord4iy, based upon both thc, represetstatior►s from the city attorneys o`hce and the C;ourt's express Endings, authority is no longer given by us for the City Council to consider the tentative tract map filed by Barton. Sincerely, j �--� Charles 5. Pausal an a J. Fause 049 Id WdES:Z© ZOO-Z V© ',AL-W 'ON aMd WOcd 03-04-62 18:38 RECEIVED FROM:760 835 9181 P-01 ATTACHMENT #3 City Council Minutes 12 March 5, 2002 5 PUBLIC COMMENT Tho\item rtone, 68-487 High athedral City, of Hacker eering and reprthe applicant in P is Hearin ern No. 2, requested con ance on thatApril 16, 2002. Non PUBLIC HEARINGS . cil concurred to take up Public Hearing Item No. 2 at this time. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING TO CERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-417 AND APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30092, AMENDMENT NO. 1, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 38.4 ACRES INTO 130 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MONROE STREET. APPLICANT: BARTON PROPERTIES, INC. Mayor Pena noted the applicant has requested a continuance (see public comment). MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to continue the public hearing on Tentative Tract Map 30092 for Barton Properties to April 16, 2002. Motion carried unanimously.* MINUTE ORDER NO. 2002-33. 1. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ON DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES. The Mayor declared theJUBLICNEARING OPEN. Interim Public Works irector/City gineer Stephens presented he staff .,port. In r onse to Council ember Adolph, . Stephenso confirmed the A has voice upport for th document. CouncilNashouldl Hen rson noted Fire Prot\a) ities is listed twi on Page 1-be corrected. She anted that she fel it's unfortununable to reference 2data in this docu nt instead of 1990 Census data. 050 NAR-05-22002 16: 481 _N ASSOCIATES 0 ATTACHMENT #4 A. LACE & MADDEP LA W OFFICES Bank of America Tower 555 South Flower Street, Suite 4500, Los Angeles, California 9007,1 TEL (213) 624-4031 • ,PAY R13) M2-]Gail E-MAIL ADDRESS; WALL.ACU1ADDEN(2NMN.G0M March 5, 2002 BY HAND DELIVERY TO THE LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL AND VIA FACSIMILE TO THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA Katherine Jenson, Esq. La Quinta City Attorney c/o Rutan & Tucker Costa Mesa, California 92628 714-546-9035 Dear Ms. Jenson: Katherine Tenson, Esq. La Quinta City Attorney c/o City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Facsimile: (760) 777-7101 Re: Public Hearing on Application by Barton Properties, Inc, Please be advised that this law firm represents Barton Properties, Inc. ("Barton"), the purchaser of the property which is referenced by tentative tract number 30092. In my conversation with you today at 4-00 p.m., you informed me that the City received a letter from Deborah Sherman -Harris, Esq. (a) withdrawing the consent of her clients, Mr. and Mrs. Charles Fausel, the record property owners, and (b) requesting that the item be taken off the calendar. I have not seen that letter but you agreed to send it to me and also that you will recommend to the City Council that the City should cease processing this application. On the other hand, we were also informed that the City's staff considers that the matter is still on the agenda and, apparently, that it should remain on the agenda. We are confused about the agenda status of this item but more fundamentally, we agree with the staff's position and believe that, at most, that the item be continued for a brief period of time. As I informed you, Barton relied on the Consent by Mr_ and/or Mrs. Fausel and on tentative tract approval and incurred considerable expense and should not be in the position of sustaining a forfeiture because of the whim of these persons. The Fausel's consent should be considered binding. There is litigation over the owner's refused to go forward with the sale of the property. The Fausels withdrew $70,000 of the applicant's money from escrow and then tried to cancel escrow ostensibly based on objections to Barton's financials. The contract between the parties has a binding arbitration clause. The Fausels refused to arbitrate and the Court granted my motion to arbitrate and the Court granted my motion to compel arbitration. We hope that an arbitration hearing will be held as soon as possible. The City has now accepted my client's application for the tentative map as complete. Moreover, the property owner has known of this application for many months, having been notified of the planning commission hearing some time ago. We believe that the Fausels 341r,2 waived any purported right to object to this application. 051. 03-05-02 16:38 RECEIVED FROM:213 362 1001 p-02 NAR-05-:20 16 : 49 43EN ASSOCIATES Katherine Tensonq. March a, 2002 Page 2 213 362 1001 P . 03.10: This project should have been approved by the City at the planning commission level. As it was, a Council member appealed the decision to the Council on the basis of various aesthetic considerations. It is not appropriate to delay this residential housing project in that it is in conformity with the general plan and zoning requirements under government Code §65589.5_ My client is in danger of incurring significant damages due to these actions of the City_ Please see that the City schedules this matter at the next available hearing date. Very truly yours, John Wallace JBW_vw 3 052 TOTAL P.071 03-05-02 16:38 RECEIVED FROM:213 362 1001 P-03 I Shining Brignier Shan Ever • P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 March 18, 2002 Mr. Steven Selinger Barton Properties, Inc. 11611 San Vincente Boulevard, Suite #605 Los Angeles, CA 90049 0 ATTACHMENT #5 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30092 - AMENDMENT #1 (760) 777-7000 FAX (760) 777-7101 In order for the City Council to process and consider your application for an amendment to your Tentative Tract Map for 130 lots, we request that you submit certain required information to supplement your application materials. Specifically, we need you to supplement the application for Tentative Tract Map approval signed by the applicant on October 11, 2001, by the required parties. The supplemental information needs to go in the bottom portion of the form. For your convenience, a copy of the form which was submitted is enclosed. In addition, please provide a preliminary title report prepared and dated no more than 90 days prior to October 17, 2001. Should you have any questions concerning the above information, please contact me at 760-777-7125. Sincerely, JERRY HERMAN Community Development Director JH:bjs Enclosure 053 ,Sent by: HACKER ENGINEERING 7802028267; 10/11J 17:02; )&tEmL-01 38; Page 2/2 Ci .T a Uinta i o USE o Y COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QTJI1'T'A, CALIFORNIA 92253 (760) 777-7125 APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT W.,P APPROVAL )1( Check here if u tstin amendment � S 0 Check here if requ;sting time extension . Case No. - Date i Fde.w Iff Related APps:_ Loiged in Location of Property: t4W1j%l-_aW e( .��nt . 5� !S- i Assessor's Parcel No.: to 1 --b'"? 2 a - na Acreage _.,._. '3'� , y &C.cyf z Zoning District Legal Description: Project Description: Related cases filed in conjunction with this request: APPY.ICANT , ICs..t 5 �\ ( ) OWNER(S) 9:5_ (Addm :) Comm Peron ' Sig uat= of Applicw Z Authority for this appl ratio rtby ignature of Property Owners) Date (wrium authority may be =Chad) Date PST NAME(S): 054 • 9P 9 ATTACHMENT 6 Barton Properties, Inc. Stephen. R. Selinger, President March 18, 2002 TO; JERRY HERMAN, CITY OF LA QUTNTA by fax 760-777-7101 Re: your letter of March 18, 2002 Dear Mr. Herman, I received your letter today. The City has 30 days from which it receives an application to state if there are any reasons it is incomplete; otherwise, the application is deemed complete. In this case, the City received the initial application of 2/25/01many months ago. This application had the signed approval of the record owners_ The City treated. my later application of 1 O/l 1 /01 as an amendment and did not require a further signature from the owners. Moreover, the record owners have known about this amendment for many months and never objected to it until after it was already brought to a public hearing and approved by the Planning Commission. it thus appears that the City is in violation of state law. The current amendment was either approved by the owners in the initial application; or if the amended application. is deemed a new one, it is still deemed a complete application as the City has been in receipt of it for well. over 30 days and has in fact held a public hearing on it already. it furthermore is simply riot fair or equitable for the record owners to now try to revoke their explicit and implicit prior consent in this matter. Please make sure that the amended map is heard at the next possible City Council ]rearing_ 1 will be significantly damaged if it is not. The record owner's objection seems to be based. upon the mistaken assertion that: they could not stop the approval of the final map as they assert that approval is a ministerial act. While it is true that the approval is a ministerial act, T have no plans to record a map by posting bonds until the ownership issue is decider]. In fact, the City could explicitly add a condition. that the map cannot record until the ownership issue is decided_ Perhaps this would allay the concerns of the record owners and allow the hearing to go forward. Even if it dues not however, the City should bring the map forward and approve it at the next bearing. Sincerely, f r Steve 5elinger 11611 Saa Vicente Boulevard, Suite bd5 Los Angeles, California 90049 Phone: 310.826+4658 Fax: 310.826*3700 Email: barton.inc@a prod-1gy.neT 3 43 055 03-18-02 16:45 RECEIVED FROM: P-01 ATTACHMENT ? P.O. Box 1504 'I 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO (760) 777-7000 Shining Brighter Than Ever LA Q U I N TA, CALIFORNIA 92253 FAX 7 6 0) 7 7 7- 7101 April 9, 2002 Mr. Steven Selinger Barton Properties, Inc. 1 1-61 1 San Vincente Boulevard, Suite #605 Los Angeles, CA 90049 Dear Mr. Selinger: The City has received your letter dated March 18, 2002. In response to your letter, the City again requests that you supplement and correct your Application for Tentative Tract Map Approval dated October 11, 2001 (the "October Application"), by obtaining the property owner's signature and consent. The City is well aware of the 30-day time frame in which the City must determine whether an application is complete under the Permit Streamlining Act. However, the fact that an application is "deemed complete" does not mean that the City cannot request information to supplement or correct the application. Section 65944(a) of the Government Code permits the City, in the course of processing an "already complete" application, to request that the applicant "clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the information required for the application." Pursuant to Government Code Section 65940, the City's list of the required application materials for a tentative subdivision map, found in Section 13.12.050 of the La Quinta City Municipal Code, requires that the applicant submit the City tentative subdivision map application form which requires the property owner's signature. The October Application did not contain the property owner's signature. Therefore, pursuant to Section 65944(a), the City is requesting that you correct and/or supplement the application materials by submitting the property owner's signature on the October Application. Section 65956(c) of the California Government Code provides that the "[f]ailure of an applicant to submit complete or adequate information pursuant to Sections 65943 and 65944, inclusive, may constitute grounds for disapproving a development project." In your letter, you allude to the proposition that because the property owner gave his/her consent in the initial application dated February 25, 2001 (the "February 3 3 .r Application ), the property owner,s consent should be binding upon the October 056 4 Mr. Steven Selinger Barton Properties, Inc. April 9, 2002 Page 2 Application. The February Application was for a 97-lot tentative tract map, which the City has already approved. The October Application must be considered as a new application for 130 lots. Section 9.200.100 of the City Municipal Code requires that amendments to an application for development projects be processed in the same manner as an original application. Please provide this information so that the City may continue to process the October Application. Sincerely, =-RRY HERMAN ommunity Development Director JH:bjs 3� 057 � ATTACHMENT 8 MI THE CITY OF " OUIMA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. SLATE OF C& FORMIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30092 THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST OlAARTER OF SECTION 22, T.6S.. R.7E. S" KRNARDW MEROIAN NIIIlit fNiiNiEtiNi, INI. �o.�� ffiiW..a ub..,�rne ......e O■■"U' i� t � 2�00f ��srw■�rr�i� �e°"ios� p�p..gr�weplL ..�.� �� CrWirr�� — ralm".a u ,� Mot fcx wr u+r"a Via. -AL n. A.G. MYL1tMC�tO iU�CAI� i� LA OtWA LAW LAW �ACJ1R1tPAt DLO - smw TAM tea. AL SAW wpm COYYYN y Ava ma 00 WI KVGM WAp1 % mo Q) *COACH s rw A1R T woo/ %NA T -REVISED A7TACHMENT 9 IN THE CITY OF LA QUW& COUNTY 01 TENTATIVETRACT MAP NO. 30092 THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECnal*- 22. T.,63X, R.7F. S.B.B.M. 2:;rvk: A.P. I. 761-720-019 �. �*-7S`•`y OUAMTflES a+,0W& I ar. oem nm L" MNJM Fm COMM Am a►r or _ I claanr of u mm jllM>rsoE Kil oosr. A.G PAYVMff MW COURSE AVEMEmamamu law Par or or W to' A" Pony od' ar o W ~� .� I Uf NW 059 .�-QwDeNEW 1e DW~ so" am an SAL TYPICAL LOT DRAKAQE DETAt # 0 0 ATTACHMENT 10 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 10. Commissioners Kirk, Butler, and Tyler agreed. 11. There being no further discussion, it was moved and se nded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planning mission Resolution 2002-001, recommending Certificati a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impa Environmental Assessment 2001-415, as recommende ROLL : AYES: Commissioners Butl k, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: 12. It was mov nd sec by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to adopt Planning Resolution 2002-002, recommending approval of Tenta act Map 29963, as submitted. ROLL CALL: AYES: missi s Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chair Abels. NO None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: N 13. The ng no further discussion, it moved and seconded by C issioners Robbins/Tyler to ado Planning Commission lution 2002-003 recommending to City Council that a blic hearing be held to consider Street Nam ange 2001-013. L CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbi Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. STAIN: None. C. Continued - Environmental Assessment 2001-417 and Tentative Tract Map 30092; a request of Barton Properties for certification of an Environmental Assessment and subdivision of approximately 38.4 acres into 130 single family and other common lots located at the northwest corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if this was within the City's Sphere of 3 Influence. Community Development Director Jerry Herman G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 6 ('1 S 0 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 clarified it was annexed into the City November 30, 2001. Commissioner Tyler asked about the temporary designation for the CVWD lift station. Commissioner Robbins clarified till someone builds a sewer it will be used. Commissioner Tyler asked about Condition #2 regarding the expiration date. Staff stated it is two years from the date of the City Council approval and the condition could be removed. Commissioner Tyler asked about Condition 50 regarding the City's new standard in regard to the Kvs for power poles. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated it is only the power lines that are attached to the 92 Kv power poles that are exempt, and therefore, it would be changed to 92 Kv. Commissioner Tyler asked about the multi -use trail as it did not appear to go anywhere. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the City has envisioned a trail system that goes east and west to create a trail system leading to Lake Cahuilla which has a trail head. Commissioner Tyler questioned Condition #62 as to whether or not is was needed as it does not appear to allow sufficient stacking. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated that since these are private streets staff anticipates that a future HOA will want to gate the entrance and staff wants to ensure the street entrance is sufficiently designed to accommodate a gate. Since the map and language have been redesigned, staff would suggest the condition be deleted. Commissioner Tyler. questioned Condition #89 as to whether or not it would apply to, the emergency access on Monroe Street. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated as the condition is currently written there would be a pedestrian access at the emergency access. ' 3. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. David Hacker, Hacker Engineering representing the applicant, stated he concurred with the conditions with the exception of Condition #52.D, regarding the multi -use trail. It would be a maintenance item for the HOA. They would prefer to dedicate to the City so that when the dedication of the additional right-of-way from adjacent property owners was obtained, this could then be constructed. At this time they would prefer to landscape the area. 4. Commissioner Butler asked if they were willing to bond for it. Mr. Hacker asked what type of trail it would be. Commissioner Butler stated mostly equestrian. Mr. Hacker stated they accepted the condition as written. r ,. �v'J 061. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC 1-8-02.wpd 7 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 5. Commissioner Robbins asked about the purpose of having a dry well on each lot, as most of them will never be maintained and why isn't the retention basin sized to handle the run off. Mr. Hacker stated the retention basin is large enough to handle the run off, this is a backup solution only. 6. Commissioner Kirk stated it appears to be the drainage plan of first resort by the way the lots are laid out. Mr. Hacker stated the dry well is an option and will only be installed if they do not meet the drainage requirements. 7. Commissioner Robbins asked staff if this was allowed. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated the 100 year storm needs to be retained in the retention basin. The City does allow them to retain their nuisance water in privately gated communities in alternate methods. If they are for nuisance water it is up to the applicant. If storm water, the retention basin needs to retain it. Mr. Hacker stated. he concurred. 8. There being no further discussion, the public participation of the hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 9. Commissioner Tyler stated his only concern was that it is just another straight line development. 10. Commissioner Butler asked if the stacking on Avenue 58 was enough. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated two car stacking is 50 feet and will be enough and went on to explain the traffic flow. 11. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-004, recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-417, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 12. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-005, recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 30092, Amendment #1, as 3 •) .7 amended. `' 062 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 8 Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 2002 A. Delete Condition #62. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. D. Specific Plan 98-034, Amendment #1; a request of Warner Engineering for Lundin Development Company for dment to the text development standards and design es a n amendment to the site plan design adjacent to A 50 f 100,500 square foot shopping center located at th0 hwest c r of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. 1. Chairman Ab pened the c hearing and asked for the staff report. P ipal Planner n Sawa presented the information contai in the staff rt, a copy of which is on file in the Co nity Develop t Department. 2. airman Abel ked if there were uestio� of staff. Commissioner er asked if the Co ion had t �. authority to waive the re ement for the b g. Staff st d it is a Zoning Ordinance uirement but, r a Specific P the development standar be modifie ommissioner r. asked if the right - out at emergen ate on the we y driveway not being inclu in the S is Plan was an rsight or a reluctance of the plicant taff stated the id not know, but they are co ion install it. 3. C issioner Butler aske out any alternatives to the berming. Staff stated the applica alternative is landsca ide the screening along w' a wall next to the f restaur Commissioner Butler ed if the bermi a safety fa for traffic on Jeffers Street . or ae s. Staff stat was aesthetics. 4. CommissionerMk asor background on t se of setbacks for retention. explained the reasons gave examples. Commissioner Kirk asked if staff had a r mendation on the number of accesses that should be allowe n Avenue 50, beyond the emergency access. Senior Enginee eve Speer stated staff has been scaling the distances between a driveways and it came to 109 feet which is rather short. a result, staff added Condition #38.E. eliminating the one access on the west end of the site on Avenue 50. 7� 063 G:\WPDOCS\PC 1Vlinutes\PC1-8-02.wpd 9 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REVISED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 130 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS AND OTHER STREET, PUBLIC UTILITY AND COMMON LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 38.4 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MONROE STREET CASE: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30092, AMENDMENT #1 APPLICANT: BARTON PROPERTIES, INC. (C/O STEVEN SELINGER) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 51h day of February, 2002, the 5th day of March, 2002, and the 161h day of April, 2002, hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider a request by Barton Properties, to amend a previously approved tentative map to allow for 130 single family homes and other miscellaneous common/utility lots on approximately 38.4 acres located at the northwest corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 3rd day of July, 2001, approve Tentative Tract Map 30092, a single family development of 97 lots and other miscellaneous common lots by adoption of Resolution 2001-92; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 11th day of December, 2001, and 8th day of January, 2002, hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider Tentative Tract Map 30092 (Amendment # 1), and adopted Resolution 2002-005 recommending approval to the City Council, more particularly described as: APN: 761-720-020; SW1/4 of Section 22, T6S, R7E, SBBM WHEREAS, on February 5, 2002, the City Council requested design changes be made to the proposed subdivision map application, including the addition of curvilinear streets, on -street parking, and internal open space; and WHEREAS, as of April 16, 2002, the Applicant has refused to make such revisions; and WHEREAS, on March 4, 2002, the Community Development Department received a letter from Charles E. Fausel and Norma J. Fausel, who identify themselves at the owners of the subject property, requesting that the City Council not take action on the proposed project and informing the City that they do not consent to the processing of Amendment # 1; and 119/015610-0002 275536.02 AM02 -1- 3- . WHEREAS, section 13.12.130 of the City's Municipal Code requires that proposed maps and the design or improvements of proposed subdivisions be consistent with the City's General Plan; and WHEREAS, section 13.12.050 of the City's Municipal Code, established pursuant to California Government Code section 65940, requires that applicants submit, as part of the required application materials for obtaining tentative maps, a preliminary title report and a tentative map application form signed by the property owner; and WHEREAS, section 9.200.100 of the City's Municipal Code requires that amendments to an application for projects be processed in the same manner as original applications; and WHEREAS, on March 18, 2002, the Community Development Director sent a letter to the applicant, Barton Properties, pursuant to California Government Code section 65944, requesting supplemental and corrected information on the project, including a preliminary title report and the owners' signature; and WHEREAS, on March 18, 2002, the applicant, Barton Properties, responded to the letter and indicated that it would not provide the corrected or supplemental information; WHEREAS, on April 9, 2002, the Community Development Director sent a second letter to the applicant, Barton Properties, pursuant to California Government Code section 65944, again requesting supplemental and corrected information on the project, namely the signatures of property owners Charles E. Fausel and Norma J. Fausel on the application form for the amendment to the tentative map; and WHEREAS, the Applicant, Barton Properties has made no response to the letter; and WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the following facts exist which justify denial of Tentative Tract Map Amendment pursuant to Government Code Sections 65943 and 65944(a): 1. That increasing the number of permitted dwelling units from 97 to 130 and the overall layout of the revised project is not consistent with the goal of the Housing Element of the City's General Plan to promote a low density character for its residential neighborhoods. 2. That increasing the number of permitted dwelling units from 97 to 130 in this location and as depicted on the revised map is contrary to the City's Housing Vision Statement, which states that while the City is to facilitate and encourage new housing, it must preserve the overall low density character of the City. 119/015610-0002 275536.02 AM02 -2- 3. That increasing the number of permitted dwelling units from 97 to 130 is not consistent with the City's Land Use Plan, which is intended to promote significant new growth in the City where such growth is not at the expense of the unique quality of life and community character that the City embodies, inasmuch as the revised map does not reflect the unique quality of life and community character of the surrounding area. 4. That the increased density, lot design, and subdivision layout associated with Amendment #1 is not consistent with the Land Use Vision Statement in the City's General Plan, which focuses on the facilitation and integration of development, through desirable character and sensitive design residential neighborhoods to enhance the existing high quality of life. 5. That according to the City's policies for found in the Housing Element of the City's General Plan, the City is to provide for new housing, which will ensure the development of attractive and functional residential neighborhoods, and while the original subdivision proposal of 97 lots is consistent with this policy, the proposed increase in the number of lots, their configuration, and the configuration of the subdivision is not consistent with this policy in that the neighborhood will neither be attractive nor functional. 6. That under the City's policy for parks and recreation development, found in the City's General Plan, the City's goal is to provide three (3) acres of park land per 1,000 residents, and Amendment #1 provides virtually no usable open space within the tract, and provides solely for parkland elsewhere. 7. That the tentative map Amendment # 1 as submitted by applicant fails to provide for adequate open space and recreational areas for its new residents. 8. That according to City's policies for park and recreation development, the applicant cannot use the area it has reserved for storm water retention to meet the park and recreation area requirements, and therefore Lot No. 131 does not satisfy the need for on -site recreational areas or open space. 9. That the increase of 33 lots pursuant to Amendment #1 is not consistent with the City's newly adopted General Plan residential policy, which is to encourage the preservation of neighborhood character and assure a consistent and compatible residential land use pattern, given the layout and design of the revised map. 10. That the increase of 33 lots pursuant to Amendment #1 is also inconsistent with the newly adopted General Plan policy of encouraging the preservation of open space in privately owned development projects. 119/015610-0002 275536.02 PM02 -3- 34I 11. That the proposed development provides no on -street parking for residents living in cul-de-sacs and will therefore cause a negative impact on nearby streets. 12. That the application that was submitted to the Community Development Department on October 17, 2001, did not include a preliminary title report or property owner authorization. 13. That Section 13.12.050, subparagraph (A) of the Subdivision Ordinance requires a subdivision map application form to be completed, including a signature by the property owner of record. 14. That correspondence from the property owners indicates that the applicant does not have authorization to proceed with the development application. 15. That Section 13.12.050, subparagraph (F) requires the applicant to submit a preliminary title report prepared and dated no more than ninety days prior to submission of the application. 16. That applicant has communicated that it is not willing to submit a preliminary title report with the development application. 17. That written requests by the Community Development Department to the applicant to have the application form completed have been met with resistance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of said City Council in this case. 2. The City Council denies the application as submitted based on the findings stated herein. 3. Based upon the facts stated herein and in the record, the City is unable to find that the proposed map is consistent with the City's general plan, and instead finds that the proposed map is inconsistent with the general plan. 4. Based upon the facts stated herein and in the record, the City is unable to find that the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are inconsistent with the City's general plan. 5. Based upon the facts stated herein. and in the record, the City finds that the design of the improvements, including the lack of open space, parking, and recreational amenities, will cause an adverse impact upon the surrounding area, as residents 119/015610-0002 275536.02 AM02 -4- 3 11 1 will not be able to satisfy their recreational needs on -site and in some cases will not be able to park in front of their homes, causing impacts to the community in the vicinity. 6. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65956(c), the applicant's failure to submit complete or adequate information pursuant to Sections 65943 and 65944 are grounds for disapproval, and the applicant has failed to submit said information. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 16t' day of April, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) 119/015610-0002 275536.02 AM02 -5- JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 3 , APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 119/015610-0002 275536.02 AM02 In COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: April 16, 2002 Public Hearing to Certify a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact; 2) General Plan Amendment 2002-084, a Request to Change 10.76 Acres of Low Density Residential Use to High Density Residential Use; 3) Zone Change 2002-084, a Request to Change 10.76 Acres of Low Density Residential Zone to High Density Residential Zone; and; 4) Site Development Permit 2002-730, a Request to Allow Development Plans for a 149 Unit Apartment Complex and Ancillary Facilities Located on the South Side of Avenue 52, East of Jefferson Street Applicant: Clubhouse Associates, L.L.C. RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Oy Move to continue this item to the May 7, 2002, City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The currently vacant triangular 10.76 acre project site is located on the south side of Avenue 52, approximately 600 feet east of Jefferson Street with the All American Canal on the eastern property line. Planning Commission Action On March 26, 2002, upon the developer's request, the Planning Commission voted 4-0-1 to continue the hearing to the April 23, 2002, Planning Commission meeting. A:\Continued CC.staff rpt 4-16-02.wpd Public Notice: The case was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on March 25, 2002. All property owners within 500 feet of the affected area were mailed a copy of the public notice as required. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: No findings are necessary to continue this request. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Move to continue this item to the May 7, 2002, City Council meeting pursuant to applicant's request; or 2. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, jrrJ y Herm nmunity Development Director Approved for Submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 4 a-. 002 AAContinued CC.staff rpt 4-16-02.wpd AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: April 16, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: Public Hearing to certify an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 2000-396 for Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1, a Request to Allow Revised Design Guidelines And Development Standards in an 81,407 Square Foot Commercial Center at the Northwest Corner of Washington Street and Highway 111. Applicant: Madison/ P.T.M. La Quinta, L. L. C. STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 2000-395 for Point Happy Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1; and, 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Point Happy Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1 . FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CITY CHARTER IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Site Location: The project site, located at the northwest corner of Highway 111 and Washington Street, consists of 9.779 acres and is under development. The project is bounded by the Whitewater Stormwater Channel on the north, Washington Street on the east, Highway 111 on the south and a rock outcrop on the west. Highway 111 and Washington Street frontage are improved with curb and gutter. A new bus stop 34 shelter and pull-out is located on the Highway 1 1 1 , and an existing shelter was re- located to service Washington Street. The C.V.W.D. Stormwater Channel with concreted sides, borders the northern portion of the site. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission reviewed the developer's request on March 16, 2002, discussed all aspects of the application request and, after deliberation, voted (4-0-1) to recommend: 1. Certification of an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 2000-395, and 2. Approval of Point Happy Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1. The recommendations are based on the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval including modifications, as requested by the Commission. Excerpts from the Minutes of the Public Hearing are attached. (Attachment 1). Project Description: The applicant is proposing to revise the conceptual Grading, Drainage, Utility, and Circulation Plans within Specific Plan 2000-43 (Attachment 2) to reflect an "as -built" status. The Conceptual Building Mass and Land Use Table are proposed to be revised to reflect "as -built" pads and new conceptual building massing for Lots 8-12, and Lot 6. This reflects a total increase in building square footage of 8,957 square feet. The following table identifies building square footage of each parcel for existing and proposed development in the Specific Plan. Point Happy Specific Plan Land Use Plan Summary: Parcel Proposed and Existing Uses 1 Fast Food 2 Restaurant 3 Restaurant 4 Office/Retail 5 Bank/Financial 6 Office/Bank/Retail 7 Service station convenience store/car wash 8 Office/Retail 9 Office/Retail 10 Office/Retail/ 11 Office/Retail 12 Retail TOTAL Proposed and Existing Building(s) Square Footage (used to calculate required parking) 2,969 5,340 9,000 5,306 9,868 5,350 3,974 10,000 9,000 4,000 8,000 81,407 3 4 4 CJ The property owner of the Tarbell Realty and Fast Frame building (Parcel No. 4) has identified a discrepancy in the Land Use Summary Table of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment (Attachment 3 ). Parcel No. 4 is an existing office retail building built at 6,711 square feet and the proposed Specific Plan lists the parcel having a building of 5,306 square feet. in order to allow the proposed overall 81,407 square feet to be built at the commercial center and meet the required 389 parking spaces, a condition of approval has been added that requires the amended Specific Plan to decrease the allowable building square footage on the undeveloped Parcels (8 through 12) by 1,405 square feet. Development Standards: In general, project development standards meet or enhance Zoning Code requirements. Maximum structure height proposed remains at 36 feet and is limited to 22 feet within 150 feet of Highway 1 1 1 and Washington Street. The Zoning Code would allow 40 feet for the entire project. Maximum number of stories proposed is two, and the Zoning Code would allow three. The applicant is not proposing any changes to height or setback. standards. In addition, the Plan Amendment updates all previously approved building square footage and parking ratios, and provides 389 parking spaces to meet Code requirements. The request is for approval to revise certain portions of the Development Regulation and Design Guidelines Sections of the Specific Plan. The applicant is proposing to add Section "C" to provide an alternate land use plan that would allow a hotel use to be located on Parcels 8-12, subject to a Conditional Use Permit. The applicant is proposing to expand the palette of plant materials available to the parking area of the site; the highlighted change proposes to include hybrid Paloverde trees in the parking lot. Landscaping guidelines identify a pallette of plant material for shrubs, groundcover, and trees for Highway 1 1 1, Washington Street, parking lot areas and buildings. Water efficient landscaping materials, including native plants are suggested where possible. Design Guidelines: The applicant is proposing the add the following to the Design Guidelines: • Add to Roof Tile: Two piece barrel tile to match approved color • Add to Stone Columns, Surrounds, Sill, and Wainscots: Exterior simulated stone (Tuscany Country Rubble) • Add to Wood Trellis & Rafters: Color "Early American" #1 15991 • Add to Accent Colors : Ryan's Eye (generally chocolate), and add Mauve Niagra (generally rich purple). • Box lights for buildings matching building design. 341.) Sign Program: The applicant is proposing to add the following to the Sign Program: • Individual back -lit halo (reverse channel) letters. Environmental Assessment: Environmental Assessment 2000-395 was certified by the City Council. An Addendum has been prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with minor changes in the project. The Community Development Department has determined that no significant environmental impacts which cannot be mitigated will result from this project. Therefore, no further environmental documentation is necessary. An Addendum to the original Environmental Assessment is recommended for certification. Public Notice: This case was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on March 25, 2002. All property owners within 500-feet of the site were mailed a copy of the public hearing notice as required by the Zoning Code. Public agency comments have been incorporated into the proposed Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: Conditions are proposed that comply with the existing provisions of the General Plan, and Zoning Code. Findings for approval can be made and are included in the attached Resolutions. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying Addendum to Environmental Assessment 2000-395 for Point Happy Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1; and, Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Point Happy Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying Addendum to Environmental Assessment 2000-395 for Point Happy Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1; and, Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Point Happy Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1, or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, unity Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Draft Planning Commission minutes for the meeting of March 26, 2002 (Excerpts) 2. Point Happy Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1 (City Council only) 3. Letter(s) received 35" 0003' RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING AN ADDENDUM TO A PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PREPARED FOR SPECIFIC PLAN 2000-043, AMENDMENT NO. 1 CASE NO: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2000-395 ADDENDUM MADISON/P.T.M. LA QUINTA, L. L C. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 16th day of April, 2002 hold a Public Hearing to consider an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 2000-395, as prepared for Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1; and, herein referred to as the "Project" for Madison/ PTM La Quinta L.L.C.; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 26th day of March, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 2000-395, as prepared for Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1; and, WHEREAS, said applications has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 97-341 pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15164; and, WHEREAS, on May 16, 2000, the La Quinta City Council certified a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2000-395 for Point Happy Specific Plan 2000-043; and, WHEREAS, the Amendment to the Specific Plan does not call for the preparation of a subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration or EIR pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15162 or Public Resources Code Section 21166, in that the Revised Project does not involve: (1) substantial changes to the project analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration which would involve new significant effects on the environment or substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which would involve new significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration or substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts; or (3) new information of substantial importance which would involve new significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration or substantially increase the severity of previously 3 identified impacts. �. OC'b A:\SP 2000-043 Amd No. 1\CC Reso EA Add 2000-395.wpd Resolution 2002- Addendum to Environmental Assessment 2000-395 Adopted April 16, 2002 WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify a recommendation for certification of said Addendum: 1 . The proposed Specific Plan Amendment will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, as the project in question will not be developed in any manner inconsistent with the General Plan and other current City standards. The project does not have the potential to eliminate an important example of California prehistory, as extensive archaeological investigation of the site have been conducted as part of the project to implement appropriate mitigation alternatives. The applicant has agreed to implementing the necessary mitigation measures prior to site development activities and is in concurrence with project conditions relating to this. 2. The project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, with implementation of the monitoring program, as the proposed project size will not exceed the total parking requirement within the Specific Plan. 3. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment and related applications will not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, in that the proposed project is undertaken pursuant to the General Plan for which a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been certified. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council for this Addendum to Environmental Assessment 2000-395. 2. That it does hereby certify an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 2000- 395 in that the changes proposed to the project are a minor nature and do not require the preparation of a subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and there are no new circumstances which would require the preparation of a subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration and there is no new information or change in circumstances which would require the preparation of a subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration. 3 r' V � 007 A:\SP 2000-043 Amd No. 1 \CC Reso EA Add 2000-395.wpd Resolution 2002- Addendum to Environmental Assessment 2000-395 Adopted April 16, 2002 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16th day of April , 2002 following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC/AAE City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California ;3 5 008 ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR SPECIFIC PLAN 2000-043, AMENDMENT NO. 1 Prepared by: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Contact: Principal Planner Fred Baker (760)777-7125 Prepared for: MADISON/P.T.M. LA QUINTA L.C.C. 71361 SAN GORGINO RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 Contact: RICK WILKERSON , MANAGING MEMBER 760-771-1755 FEBRUARY 1, 2002 355 INTRODUCTION This Addendum to the previously certified Environmental Assessment (EA 2000-395) for the Point Happy Specific Plan 2000-043 has been completed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in order to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with minor changes. PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION Proposed changes to now require further environmental evaluation. This evaluation need not take the form of another EA, as explained below, but can take place in an Addendum to the EA for Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No.1 . EA ADDENDUM CRITERIA According to CEQA Guidelines § 15164, if a project does not fulfill any of the criteria enumerated in CEQA Guidelines § 15162(a) (1)-(3) then an Addendum, rather than a subsequent or Supplemental EA is appropriate. The determination that none of the criteria outlined in CEQA Guidelines § 15162(a) (1)-(3) are fulfilled must be supported by substantial evidence. As stated in CEQA Guidelines § 15162: a. When an EIR has been certified or negative declaration adopted no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified 010 2 significant effects; or, (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or Negative Declaration was adopted shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or Negative Declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. A detailed description of the initially proposed project and the currently proposed project is provided in Section (Project Site Characteristics) of this document. Using the information provided in Section 2, a brief refutation of the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines § 15162 is provided as follows. Subsection (a)(1) does not apply to the proposed changes to the Project because the revision is not a substantial change in the Project's scale with commensurate increase in environmental impacts from those initially anticipated and disclosed in the Negative Declaration. No new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects would occur as a result of construction of the currently proposed project. Subsection (a)(2) does not apply because there are no substantial changes to he existing environmental conditions such that new and significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the environmental impacts would occur. As previously stated, the proposed Project is not a substantial change, with a commensurate increase in environmental impacts. In summary, the environmental circumstances under which the Project is undertaken are substantially similar to, or 35 3 in some cases are, improved over the conditions in 2000. Lastly, Subsection (a)(3) does not apply because the environmental analysis did not identify any significant environmental effects that were not previously disclosed in the Negative Declaration, nor did this analysis find that any significant environmental effects previously examined in the Negative Declaration will be substantially more severe with the revised plan. In fact, some effects were determined to be less severe as a result of the project redesign. Further, this analysis did not reveal that there are any new mitigation measures that would substantially reduce one or more significant effects. In summary, CEQA Guidelines § 15164 (a) states that: "The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred." Given that none of the conditions outlined in CEQA Guidelines § 15162 have occurred, an Addendum to the Negative Declaration is the appropriate document for evaluating environmental impacts resulting from the revised Tentative Tract. PROJECT SITE CHARACTERISTICS GENERAL The proposed Point Happy Specific Plan is a commercial center consisting of nine building clusters designed around centralized parking. The project site is divided into twelve 12 buildable parcels. The uses proposed include retail, fast food, restaurant, office, bank, financial and a service station/convenience store/car wash. Each proposed building requires a site development permit and the proposed uses may move or change location among the development pads at time a site development review permit is processed subject to the total parking provided for the commercial center. The Specific Plan establishes guidelines and standards in a focused development plan for the distribution of land uses, location and sizing of supporting infrastructure, design and development standards, and requirements for public improvements. The revision to this Specific Plan adds additional landscape material, one additional sign type, one additional roof tile type, one additional facade type, and a project entry/street name change. In addition the plan amendment updates all previously approved building square footage and parking ratios. These proposed additions appl to the entire site. Ok v 012 M REVISED IMPACTS The addition of landscape, design material, street name change, and updating building size and parking allocation on the project site will not change the environmental impacts. No significant change in impacts will result in the areas of air quality, noise, population generation, use of natural and energy resources, traffic, public facility and services demand, and cumulative impacts. CONCLUSION The La Quinta Community Development Department has determined that based on this addendum to the previously certified Negative Declaration, no further environmental review is deemed necessary, pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15304. . 3 013 A:\SP 2000-043 Amd No. 1 \EA Addendum.wpd 5 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REVISED DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR AN 81,407 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL CENTER AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND HIGHWAY 111 CASE NO. SPECIFIC PLAN 2000-043, AMENDMENT NO.1 MADISON/P.T.M. LA QUINTA, L. L C. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta did on the 16th day of April, 2002, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of Madison/P.T.M. La Quinta, L. L C. for approval of revised guidelines and standards in a development plan including the distribution of land uses and development standards, for commercial and office uses, located at the northwest corner of Highway 1 1 1 and Washington Street, more particularly described as: PARCEL MAP 29736; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 26th day of March, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider an Amendment to Specific Plan 2000-043, a 81,407 square foot commercial development consisting of a mixture of retail, office and restaurant uses on 9.779 acres, generally bounded by; Washington Street, Highway 1 1 1, and the CVWD Storm Water Channel. The project area is located at the northwest corner of Highway 1 1 1 and Washington Street; and, WHEREAS, said Specific Plan Amendment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-63), in that an Environmental Assessment was conducted for Specific Plan 2000-043 (Point Happy Commercial Center) in 2000, for the overall development of the Commercial Center. No substantive changes exists which would require the preparation of additional environmental documentation. An Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with minor changes in the project. The Community Development Department has determined that no significant environmental impacts which cannot be mitigated will result from this project. Therefore, no further Environmental Documentation is necessary pursuant to Public Resources Code 21166. WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Specific Plan Amendment: 361 014 Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1 Adopted April 16, 2002 1 . That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan in that the property is designated Community Commercial which permits the uses proposed for the property. 2. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare in that the resulting land uses and circulation will require Planning Commission and City Council review and approval of future development plans, which will ensure adequate conditions of approval. 3. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment is a guideline; further review will be required under a Site Development Permit review process at which time project related conditions will be attached to mitigate impacts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve of the above -described Specific Plan Amendment request for the reasons set forth in this Resolution, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 16th day of April, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC/AAE City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 015 Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1 Adopted April 16, 2002 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 361-4 016 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 2000-043, AMENDMENT NO. 1 ADOPTED APRIL 16, 2002 GENERAL 1 . The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Prior to the issuance of a grading, construction or building permit, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances from the following public agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Caltrans Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) The applicant is responsible for any requirements of the permits or clearances from those jurisdictions. If the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of said approvals prior to obtaining City approval of the plans. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit. For projects requiring project -specific NPDES construction permits, the applicant shall submit a copy of the CWQCB acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent prior to issuance of a grading or site construction permit. The applicant shall ensure that the required Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan is available for inspection at the project site. 3. This development shall be subject to the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of permit approval. 017 A:\SP 2000-043 Amd No. 1\CC COA SP 2000-043, AMD. No. 1.wpd Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1 Adopted April 16, 2002 PROPERTY RIGHTS 4. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. 5. The applicant may be required by Caltrans to furnish additional Highway 1 1 1 right of way to accommodate the proposed bus turnout and dedicated right -turn -in lane. If so, the right of way shall be deeded to the City in fee simple. 6. If the applicant cannot obtain permission from CVWD for location of the bikepath (required below) within the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, the applicant shall grant an easement across the north end of this property for that purpose. 7. The applicant shall dedicate or deed cross -access easements to all private lots or parcels existing or created on this property. The easements shall cover all parking and circulation areas and routes within the development. 8. The applicant shall create perimeter setbacks along public rights of way as follows: A. Highway 1 1 1 - 50 feet. B. Washington Street - 20 feet. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall dedicate blanket easements for those purposes. 9. The applicant shall dedicate easements necessary for placement of and access to utility lines and structures. 10. The applicant shall vacate abutter's rights of access to public streets from all frontage except access points described herein. 1 1 . The applicant shall furnish proof of easements or written permission, as appropriate, from owners of any abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments are to occur. 12. Prior to placement of any privately -owned buildings or other costly structures in the City's drainage easement along Washington Street, the applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit for that purpose. The permit will require that in the event the City finds it necessary to construct, reconstruct or maintain facilities therein, the applicant shall indemnify the City from expenses exceeding those which would have been incurred with hardscape or landscaping. 36`µ 018 A:\SP 2000-043 Amd No. 1\CC COA SP 2000-043, AMD. No. 1.wpd Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1 Adopted April 16, 2002 IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these conditions of approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 13. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and landscape architects, as appropriate. Plans shall be submitted on 24" x 36" media in the categories of "Rough Grading," "Precise Grading," "Streets & Drainage," and "Landscaping." Precise grading plans shall have signature blocks for Community Development Director and the Building Official. All other plans shall have signature blocks for the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until they are signed. "Streets and Drainage" plans shall normally include signals, sidewalks, bike paths, entry drives, gates, and parking lots. "Landscaping" plans shall normally include irrigation improvements, landscape lighting and entry monuments. "Precise Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls. Plans for improvements not listed above shall be in formats approved by the City Engineer. 14. The City may maintain standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee established by City resolution, the applicant may acquire standard plan and/or detail sheets from the City. 15. When final plans are approved by the City, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete, approved plans for any public street improvements on storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu items so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. At the completion of construction and prior to final acceptance of improvements, the applicant shall update the files to reflect as -constructed conditions. If the plans were not produced in AutoCad or a file format which can be converted to AutoCad, the City Engineer may accept raster -image files of the plans. A:\SP 2000-043 Amd No. 1\CC COA SP 2000-043, AMD. No. 1.wpd 019 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1 Adopted April 16, 2002 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 16. Depending on the timing of development of the lots or parcels created by this map and the status of off -site improvements at that time, the subdivider may be required to construct improvements, to construct additional improvements subject to reimbursement by others, to reimburse others who construct improvements that are obligations of this map, to secure the cost of the improvements for future construction by others, or a combination of these methods. In the event that any of the improvements required herein are constructed by the City after the date of approval of the original conditions of approval for this property, the Applicant shall, at the time of approval of a map or other development or building permit, reimburse the City for the cost of those improvements. 17. The applicant shall construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations, or furnish an executed, secured agreement to construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations required by the City prior to approval of a final map or parcel map, or issuance of a certificate of compliance for a waived parcel map. For secured agreements, security provided, and the release thereof, shall conform with Chapter 13, LQMC. Improvements to be made or agreed to shall include removal of any existing structures or obstructions which are not part of the proposed improvements. 18. If improvements are secured, the applicant shall provide estimates of improvement costs for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Estimates shall comply with the schedule of unit costs adopted by City resolution or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's schedule, estimates shall meet the approval of the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies. Security is not required for telephone, gas, or T.V. cable improvements. However, development -wide improvements shall not be agendized for final acceptance until the City receives confirmation from the telephone authority that the applicant has met all requirements for telephone service to lots within the development. 19. If improvements are phased with multiple final maps or other administrative approvals (e.g., Site Development Permits), off -site improvements and common improvements A:\SP 2000-043 Amd No. 1\CC COA SP 2000-043, AMD. No. 1.wpd ozo Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1 Adopted April 16, 2002 (e.g., access drives, traffic signal improvements & perimeter landscaping) shall be constructed or secured prior to approval of the first phase unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 20. If the applicant fails to construct improvements or satisfy obligations in a timely manner or as specified in an approved phasing plan or in an improvement agreement, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 21. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall furnish a preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report and an approved grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer. The grading plan shall conform with the recommendations of the soils report and be certified as adequate by a soils engineer or engineering geologist. 22. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 22. Prior to occupation of the project site for construction purposes, the applicant shall submit and receive approval of a fugitive dust control plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. The Applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the city, in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the provisions of the permit. 23. The applicant shall maintain graded, undeveloped land to prevent wind and water erosion of soils. The land shall be planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion and wind control measures soil stabilizing binders approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. 24. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide building pad certifications stamped and signed by qualified engineers or surveyors. For each pad, the certification shall list the approved elevation, the actual elevation, the difference between the two, if any, and pad compaction. The data shall be organized by lot number and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. A:\SP 2000-043 Amd No. 1\CC COA SP 2000-043, AMD. No. 1.wpd 3 021. Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1 Adopted April 16, 2002 DRAINAGE 25. If the applicant proposes discharge of stormwater directly or indirectly to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, the applicant shall indemnify the City from the costs of any sampling and testing of the development's drainage discharge which may be required under the City's NPDES Permit or other City- or area -wide pollution prevention program, and for any other obligations and/or expenses which may arise from such discharge. The indemnification shall be executed and furnished to the City prior to issuance of any grading, construction or building permit and shall be binding on all heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors in interest in the land within this tentative map excepting therefrom those portions required to be dedicated or deeded for public use. The form of the indemnification shall be acceptable to the City Attorney. If such discharge is approved for this development, the applicant shall make provisions in the CC&Rs for meeting these potential obligations. 26. If the applicant does not discharge stormwater to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, stormwater shall be retained on -site and disposed of in facilities approved by the City Engineer. 27. Nuisance water shall be retained on site and disposed of in facilities approved by the City Engineer. UTILITIES 28. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within the right of way and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electrical vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 29. Existing aerial lines within or adjacent to the proposed development and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. Power lines exceeding 34.5 kv are exempt from this requirement. 30. Utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing, improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of trench compaction for approval of the City Engineer. A:\SP 2000-043 Amd No. 1 \CC COA SP 2000-043, AMD. No. 1.wpd 3 6 3 022 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1 Adopted April 16, 2002 STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 31. The applicant shall install the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. (Public street improvements shall conform with the City's General Plan in effect at the time of construction.) A. OFF -SITE STREETS AND BIKEPATH 1) Highway 1 1 1 - Complete construction of north side of the street. Construct eight -foot sidewalk/bikepath. Modify traffic signal, median, traffic signs, and traffic markings at the west access drive to accommodate a fourth leg on the intersection. 2) Washington Street (Major Arterial) - Construct eight -foot sidewalk/bike path. Modify traffic signal, median, traffic signs, and traffic markings at the north access drive to accommodate a fourth leg on the intersection. If a hotel use is selected as described in Alternative Use #2, the a applicant shall construct a right turn lane for south bound traffic from Washington Street onto Highway 111, including necessary modifications to the existing traffic signal, curbs and gutters, traffic signs and traffic markings. The design of the right turn lane shall be subject to Caltrans and the City Engineer's approval. Additional right of way may be required to accommodate the approved right turn lane design and shall be dedicated to the City and the State as necessary. 3) Bike path- Pay pro-rata share of Bike Path adjacent to project site. Prorate share shall not exceed $30 per lineal foot of 8-foot wide PCC bike path. 32. The applicant may be required to extend improvements beyond development boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 33. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC, adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, and as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. A:\SP 2000-043 Amd No. 1\CC COA SP 2000-043, AMD. No. 1.wpd 023 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1 Adopted April 16, 2002 34. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using Caltrans' design procedure (20-year life) and site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows (or approved equivalents for alternate materials) : Residential & Parking Areas 3.0" a.c./4.50" c.a.b. Collector 4.0"/5.00" Secondary Arterial 4.0"/6.00" Primary Arterial 4.5"/6.00" Major Arterial 5.5"/6.50" 35. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 36. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Highway 111 1) Full -access drive at existing traffic signal at the southwest corner of this property. 2) Right-in/Right-out drive centered approximately 435 feet east of the centerline of the westerly drive. B. Washington Street 1) Full -access drive at existing traffic signal at the northeast corner of this property. LANDSCAPING 37. The applicant shall provide landscape improvements in landscape setbacks and in on - site areas as designated in the landscape plan for this Specific Plan. 38. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. A:\SP 2000-043 Amd No. 1 \CC COA SP 2000-043, AMD. No. 1.wpd 024 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1 Adopted April 16, 2002 The applicant shall submit plans for approval by the Community Development Department prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking is complete, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner prior to submitting for signature by the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 39. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. PUBLIC SERVICES 40. The applicant shall provide an improved bus turnout with a City approved Bus Shelter design on Highway 111 as required by Sunline Transit and approved by the City Engineer and Community Development Director. The applicant shall provide an improved bus turnout with a City approved Bus Shelter design on Washington Street between the Coachella Valley Storm Water Channel and Washington Street, if needed by Sunline Transit and approved by the City Engineer and Community Development Director. The applicant shall install electric power connection to provide electricity to bus shelter on Highway 111. The electric power may be connected to an existing circuit owned by the City if there is one conveniently available in the vicinity, or at applicant's expense request IID to install a new electric meter to power the circuit. The City will accept the electric meter and power circuit when completed. QUALITY ASSURANCE 41. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures which meet the approval of the City Engineer. 42. The applicant shall employ or retain qualified civil engineers, geotechnical engineers, surveyors, or other appropriate professionals to provide sufficient construction supervision to be able to furnish and sign accurate record drawings. 43. The applicant shall arrange and bear the cost of measurement, sampling and testing procedures not included in the Cityyis inspection program but required by the City as ., - A:\SP 2000-043 Amd No. 1\CC COA SP 2000-043, AMD. No. 1.wpd 025 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1 Adopted April 16, 2002 evidence that construction materials and methods comply with plans, specifications and applicable regulations. 44. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all improvements constructed within City or Caltrans' right of way. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As - Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the CAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City to reflect as -constructed conditions. MAINTENANCE 45. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all on - site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. The applicant shall maintain required public improvements until expressly released from this responsibility by the appropriate public agency. FEES AND DEPOSITS 46. The applicant shall pay the City's established fees for plan checking and construction inspection. Fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan checking and permits. FIRE MARSHAL 48. All water mains and fire hydrants providing required fire flows shall be constructed in accordance with the appropriate sections of the water district, subject to the approval by the Riverside County Fire Department. 49. Automatic fire sprinklers providing required fire flows shall be constructed in accordance with La Quinta City Ordinance 8.08.090. 50. All interior fire apparatus access roads shall be a minimum of 20 feet unobstructed width and ab unobstructed vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches. Any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of any building shall be located within 150 feet from apparatus access as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. A:\SP 2000-043 Amd No. 1\CC COA SP 2000-043, AMD. No. 1.wpd 026 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1 Adopted April 16, 2002 MISCELLANEOUS 51. Prior to issuance of a Site Development Permit , the final Conditions of Approval shall be incorporated in the Final Specific Plan document. Applicant shall work with staff to correct internal document inconsistencies prior to final publication of five copies of the Specific Plan document. 52. On Page 39 of the Specific Plan under General Criteria add a new item to read: "Detailed sign plan shall be submitted for each tenant or building consistent with the Specific Plan Sign Program prior to issuance of a building permit." 53. On Page 35 of the Specific Plan under Architectural Features and Details add a new bullet point to read: "Design articulation and enhanced landscaping of all buildings along on all north elevations (i.e. rear elevations facing the channel) shall be required." 54. On Page 36 of the Specific Plan under Carports add a new bullet point to read: "All carport structures shall be made of wood." Delete the word steel in the second bullet point under carports regarding acceptable materials. 55. Prohibit Date Palms trees in high use activity locations including pedestrian corridors and courtyards. 56. Delete restaurant use from Parcel 12 in Table 1 (Land Use Summary). 57. Add lighting bollards to Landscape Details, Figure 10 per the adopted Point Happy Specific Plan and the Highway 1 1 1 Design Guidelines. 58. Delete the Point Happy Parking Analysis from the Final Specific Plan as it is not relevant until submittal for a Site Development Permit and Conditional Use Permit to allow a hotel occurs. 59. Allow a street name change to "Point Happy Drive" on the east side of the property on Washington Street into the One Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center; a street name change to "Point Happy Drive" at the signal on Highway 1 1 1 at the south driveway into the property shall be allowed only after obtaining the express written permission (and presented to the City) from the La Quinta Plaza Shopping Center owners (the shopping center on the south side of Highway 1 1 1. 60. Prior to issuance of a Site Development Permit, applicant shall submit a revised Final Specific Plan with an adjusted Land Use Plan Summary Table with actual building A:\SP 2000-043 Amd No. 1\CC COA SP 2000-043, AMD. No. 1.wpd 3 , 7 02� �.� Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No. 1 Adopted April 16, 2002 square footage for Parcel 4 of 6,711 square feet; and decreasing the allowable building square footage on the undeveloped Parcels (8 through 12) by 1,405 square feet allowing an overall 81,407 square feet at the commercial center to meet the 389 parking spaces required by use (Zoning Code Parking Chapter 9.150). A:\SP 2000-043 Amd No. 1\CC COA SP 2000-043, AMD. No. 1.wpd 028 ATTACHMENT #1 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA March 26, 2002 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:04 p.m. by Chairman Abels who lead the flag salute. Present: Commissioners Richard Butler, Tom Kirk, Robert Tyler, and Chairman Jacques Abels. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to excuse Commissioner Robbins. Unanimously approved. C. taff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, Assistant y Attorney John Ramirez, Senior Engineer Steve Speer, Principal Pla ner Fred Baker, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC CO ENT: None. III. CONFIRMATIO OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Chairman Abel asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of Mauch 12, 2002. _Commissioner Tyler asked that Page 7, Item #18 be corrected. There being no further corrections, it was moved and seconded by Cam issioners Kirk/Tyler to approve the minutes as corrected. Unanimou ly approved. B. Department Report: Non V. PRESENTATION'S: None. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Environmental Assessment 2000-395 Addendum and Specific Plan 2000- �` 043 Amendment #1; a request of Madison/P.T.M. La Quinta, L.L.C. a recommendation for certification of an Addendum to a previously certified Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and review of revised design guidelines and development standards for an 81,907 square foot commercial center located at the northeast corner of Highway 1 1 1 and Washington Street. r "{ 030 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\3-26-02.wpd 1 Planning Commission Minutes March 26, 2002 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Kirk asked if the parking analysis should be included in the Specific Plan. Staff stated a parking analysis would be required at the time a site development permit or conditional use permit are submitted and uses identified. At that time the amount of parking needed would be defined. 4. Commissioner Butler asked if the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee reviewedthe changes. Staff stated they review projects and not specific plans. 5. Commissioner Tyler asked staff who was requiring the stone materials on the Circle K building. Staff stated the Specific Plan only allows the Cantera stone. This amendment allows for variation. 6. Commissioner Tyler asked if the updated General Plan adopted by the City Council was in affect at this time. Staff stated yes. Commissioner Tyler then questioned why a street name did not require a General Plan Amendment. Staff stated the General Plan policy is to have the same name through the project. In this case the access at both entrances already have different names. Their request is to have the same name. 7. Commissioner Kirk asked if the Specific Plan allows fOF simulated Canters stone patterns. Staff stated yes. 8. Commissioner Butler asked if a hotel was proposed, would the parking analysis be brought forward again. Staff stated they would have to prepare a parking plan to accommodate the use proposed. At this time they are only asking to have the use approved. Commissioner Butler asked if the City, at the time the parking analysis was reviewed, be able to control the valet parking. Staff stated projects have been conditioned to provide a valet parking program, but staff's primarily purpose is to look at the number of spaces. 031 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\3-26-02.wpd 2 Planning Commission Minutes March 26, 2002 9. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Rick Wilkerson, representing the applicant, stated his concern with the Point Happy Street sign. When the project was proposed they were told they had to use the existing street names. At that time they were unaware of the significant importance of the site and name "Point Happy". In regard to staff's recommendations, he asked where the light bollards were to be placed. Staff clarified they were requesting the bollard type be identified in the final Specific Plan. Mr. Wilkerson stated he would like to retain the use of the Red Fountain Grass. He further questioned the condition requiring them to supply; power to the bus stop and asked that it be removed. He voiced an objection to the design of the bus stop as the users do not use the seating, but stand in their landscaping to be in the shade, which has required them to replaced the landscaping three times so far. They are willing to plant some sizeable trees and ground cover to help solve the problem. 10. Chairman Abels asked is therewere any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Tyler noted the bus stop on Washington Street was not on the Specific Plan and needed to be added and he thought it would be difficult to change the street names at this time. 11. Commissioner Kirk asked the applicant to explain the reasoning for the change in the sign program. Mr. Wilkerson stated that in looking at other projects in the Valley, they determined the halo backlit letters are a better looking sign. The box lights are a preference. Commissioner Kirk asked staff to clarify the letter received from Sunline. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated this particular bus shelter on Washington Street is owned by Sunline. The bus shelter on Highway 111 is owned by the City. According to the letter from Sunline they will maintain the shelter on Highway 111 at the City's expense. The one on Washington Street they will maintain at their expense. This was not known until this became an issue recently when staff was trying to remove the bus stop on the south side of Highway 111 on Washington Street. Sunline stated they would move the service as soon as someone gave them power to the new bus shelter. Staff understood Sunline did not want their own meter, but they would tie into the property owners meter and pay them a flat fee. This is not their policy. Staff therefore, asked for a clarification on their policy and this letter is the result. If they own the shelter 7' --• they will provide their own power, but if it is a developer installed J i 032 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\3-26-02.wpd 3 Planning Commission Minutes March 26, 2002 shelter, they consider it the developer's responsibility to pay for ongoing maintenance. This is a public facility and once it is turned over to the public agency, the agency maintains it. Sunline does not do the same. Now we need lighting and no one wants to pay for it. In most instances they use solar power, but it has been a problem with vandalism. Commissioner Kirk asked who was receiving the revenue from the advertising. Staff stated it was to be split 50%. Commissioner Kirk stated that if they are receiving 50% of the revenue, they should be responsible for 50% of the power. If the shelter was owned by the developer, they could earn the revenue. 15. Commissioner Kirk suggested changing the name on Washington Street all the way across and if a letter is received from the Von's Shopping Center to allow the name change to occur, they do so at the Highway 1 1 1 entrance. He agrees with allowing the Red FountainGrass. In regard to the bus stop, whoever is receiving revenue from the advertising, should be responsible for paying for the power. In regard to the design of the bus stop, he concurs with allowing staff to work with the developer within the Highway 111 Design Guidelines, to provide the shelter and necessary modifications on the design of the bus shelters. 16. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-035 recommending certification of an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 2000- 395, as recommended. ►� -� 3�� 033 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\3-26-02.wpd 4 Planning Commission Minutes March 26, 2002 0 ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. 17. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-036 recommending approval of Specific Plan 2000-043 Amendment No. 2, subject to the findings and conditions as amended: V dfl C "VVL- I VV d11U 01LU LJUVU1U IIIVIIL f VI IIIII GvvL-/ Jv, a req st of Clubhouse Associates, L.L.C. for a recommendation for certificat of an Environmental Assessment; change the General Plan Land Use an oning Designation from Low Density Residential to High Density Resident • and approval of development plans for a 149 unit apartment complex d ancillary facilities located on a 10.75 acre triangular parcel on the outh side of Avenue 52, east of Jefferson Street. 1 . Chairman Abels opened the p lic hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Fred ker presented the information contained in the staff report, a cop of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3 r ,. 034 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\3-26-02.wpd 5 ATTACHMENT #3 JAWS H. FORSYTHE 71-382 CYPRESS DRIVE RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 April 4, 2002 Community Development Dept La Quinta Civic Center 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 SUBJ: Point Happy Specific Plan 2000-043, Amendment No 1. Dear Sir or Madam: I am the owner of Parcel 4 in Point Happy (Tarbell Realty, Fast Frame). In reviewing the proposed revisions to the Development Standards and Design Guidelines, I noticed that the square footage of my building was substantially understated. The actual size of this building is 6,711 square feet. I do not know if this discrepancy has any impact on your deliberations, but I felt the correct facts should be stated. Sincerely, Jam . Forsythe