The URL can be used to link to this page

2002 06 18 CCTil4t 4 lwQ" City Council Agendas are available on the City's web page @www.la-quinta.org City Council Agenda CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER 78-495 Calle Tampico - La Quinta, California 92253 Regular Meeting Tuesday, June 18, 2002 - 2:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Beginning Res. No. 2002-86 Ord. No. 372 ROLL CALL: Council Members: Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. CLOSED SESSION 1. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957, COUNCIL APPOINTED POSITION - CITY ATTORNEY. NOTE: Time permitting, the City Council may conduct Closed Session discussions during the dinner recess. Additionally, persons identified as negotiating parties, do not attend the closed session when the City is considering acquisition of real property. RECONVENE 3:00 P.M. 1100 City Council Agenda Page 1 June 18, 2002 IV. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE V. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or matters that are not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. Please watch the timing device on the podium. For all Business Session matters or Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak to come forward at the appropriate time. VI. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA VII. PRESENTATIONS Vill. WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE IX. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 4, 2002. X. CONSENT CALENDAR Note: Consent Calendar items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved by one motion unless requested for separate consideration by a member of the City Council or the public. 1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED JUNE 18, 2002. 2. TRANSMITTAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT FOR APRIL 30, 2002. 3. TRANSMITTAL OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES REPORT FOR APRIL 30, 2002. 4. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CERTIFICATES OF ACCEPTANCE FOR DEEDS OR OTHER CONVEYANCES PURSUANT TO AGREEMENTS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. 5. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2002. City Council Agenda Page 2 June 18, 2002 002 6. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2002 FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 7. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE PERSONNEL/RISK MANAGER TO ATTEND THE CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY ANNUAL RISK MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO BE HELD SEPTEMBER 11-13, 2002, IN SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA. 8. APPROVAL OF AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR CITY FACILITIES. 9. APPROVAL OF RATIFICATION OF AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT OF PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY. 10. ACCEPTANCE OF A FISCAL YEAR 2002 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT (LLEBG) AWARD IN THE AMOUNT OF $24,243 FROM THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE. 11. DENIAL OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FILED BY THE GAS COMPANY - DATE OF LOSS: OCTOBER 26, 2001. 12. APPROVAL OF AWARD OF CONTRACT TO CONSTRUCT THE WASHINGTON STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT 2001-02. 13. APPROVAL OF RE -APPROPRIATION OF TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION RELIEF FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001. 14. APPROVAL OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS, FOR THE LA QUINTA COMMUNITY PARK, PROJECT 2000-1 1 . 15. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL PARCEL MAP AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL MAP 30519, SEDONA HOMES, INC. 16. ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH TRACT NO. 29623, SUNFLOWER. 17. ACCEPTANCE OF AVENUE 52 WIDENING PROJECT FROM CETRINO STREET TO JEFFERSON STREET, PROJECT 99-04. 18. APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS FOR INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE LA QUINTA COMMUNITY PARK. 19. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 371, AN ORDINANCE RE -ZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO A HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION. CASE NO: ZONE CHANGE 2002-106. APPLICANT CLUB HOUSE ASSOCIATES L.L.C. 20. APPROVAL OF ESTABLISHING A FUND FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY FOR THE COACHELLA VALLEY VIOLENT CRIME TASK 21. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION WAIVING PROTEST PROCEEDINGS RELATED TO ANNEXATION NO. 13 TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA. 001 City Council Agenda Page 3 June 18, 2002 W 17 BUSINESS SESSION CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE INVESTMENT POLICY OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002/03. A. RESOLUTION ACTION 2. CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO THE ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE, COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION, CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION, HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION, INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD, AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 3. CONSIDERATION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT OF THE DESERT'S REQUEST FOR A CPI - BASED RATE INCREASE PURSUANT TO SECTION 15.1 OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT FOR THE COLLECTION, TRANSPORTATION, AND DISPOSAL OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 4. CONSIDERATION OF THE JULY 4, 2002, HOLIDAY SCHEDULE. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 5. CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF A DONATION OF ART PIECES FROM SANTA FE CORPORATION. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION. STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSSION OF CITY'S ADOPTED FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003 MARKETING PLAN. XIII. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. CITY COUNCIL AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORTS 2. CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS 3. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WORKSHOP/INFORMATION COMMITTEE (SNIFF) 4. C.V. MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (PERKINS) 5. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (SNIFF) 6. DESERT RESORTS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 7. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES COMMITTEE (HENDERSON) 8. MUSEUM EXPANSION COMMITTEE (ADOLPH/SNIFF) 9. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION & VISITORS AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 10. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION 11. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FREE LIBRARY SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE 12. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DESERT LIBRARY ZONE ADVISORY BOARD (HENDERSON) 13. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (PENA) 14. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY/SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP (PENA) 15. INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES DATED MAY 8, 2002 16. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR MAY 14 & 28, 2002 17. ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES FOR MAY 1, 2002 004 18. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES FOR APRIL 18, 2002 �! City Council Agenda Page 4 June 18, 2002 XIV. DEPARTMENT REPORTS 1. CITY MANAGER 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK A. REPORT ON UPCOMING EVENTS 4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIRECTOR MONTHLY REPORT FOR MAY, 2002 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MONTHLY REPORT FOR MAY, 2002 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR MONTHLY REPORT FOR MAY, 2002 7. FINANCE DIRECTOR 8. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER MONTHLY REPORT FOR MAY, 2002 9. POLICE CHIEF MONTHLY REPORT FOR MAY, 2002 10. FIRE CHIEF XV. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS - NONE RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. XVI. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak form" and limit your comments to three (3) minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. XVII. PRESENTATIONS XVIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak, to come forward at the appropriate time. Any person may submit written comments to the La Quinta City Council/ Redevelopment Agency before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of, or in opposition to, the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to the public hearing. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING TO CERTIFY A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-418; AND ZONE CHANGE 2001-100 TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WITHIN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE FOR SUBSEQUENT ANNEXATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 200 ACRES BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY AVENUE 52, ON THE EAST BY MONROE STREET, ON THE SOUTH BY AVENUE 53, AND EAST OF THE EXISTING CITY LIMITS. APPLICANT: NRI LA QUINTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) B. WAIVE FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE AND READ BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY C. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. 005 City Council Agenda Page 5 June 18, 2002 2. PUBLIC HEARING ON 1) CERTIFICATION OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; 2) SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2002-056; AND 3) SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-731, A REQUEST FOR AN OFFICE/MEDICAL COMPLEX AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF ONE OF THE TWO BUILDINGS FOR A MEDICAL OFFICE ON 1.50 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WASHINGTON STREET, 200 FEET NORTH OF LAKE LA QUINTA DRIVE, WITHIN THE LAKE LA QUINTA PROJECT AREA. APPLICANT WG PROPERTIES, LLC. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) 3. PUBLIC HEARING ON 1) CERTIFICATION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, AND 2) TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30378, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 89.31 ACRES INTO EIGHT RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND OTHER COMMON LOTS OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 51 AND MADISON STREET. APPLICANT: ROD VANDENBOS. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) 4. PUBLIC HEARING ON 1) CERTIFICATION OF AN ADDENDUM TO EIR 232, 2) CERTIFICATION OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, AND 3) ZONE CHANGE 2002-107 TO ALLOW THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 640 ACRES INTO THE CITY, LOCATED BETWEEN AVENUE 60 AND AVENUE 62, MADISON STREET AND MONROE STREET. APPLICANT: SHEA HOMES A. RESOLUTION ACTION B. WAIVE FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE AND READ BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY. C. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. 5. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD SECTION 9.50.055, SECOND FLOOR ADDITION WITHIN AN EXISTING UNIT IN THE RVL AND RL ZONING DISTRICTS. A. WAIVE FURTHER READING OF ORDINANCE AND READ BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY. B. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. XIX. ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to a Special Meeting of the City Council to be held June 20, 2002, at 10:00 a.m in the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253, and to the regularly scheduled City Council Meeting, commencing with closed session at 2:00 p.m. and open session at 3:00 p.m., Tuesday, July 2, 2002, in the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. 009 City Council Agenda Page 6 June 18, 2002 DECLARATION OF POSTING I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting of Tuesday, June 18, 2002, was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico and on the bulletin board at the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce and at Stater Bros. 78-630 Highway 111, on Friday, June 14, 2002. DATED: June 14, 2002 J GREEK, CIVIC City Clerk, City of La Quinta, California PUBLIC NOTICES The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at 777-7025, twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 777- 7025. A one (1) week notice is required. If background material is to be presented to the City Council during a City Council meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the 3:00 p.m session or the 7:00 p.m session. City Council Agenda Page 7 June 18, 2002 Bill Pierce 78600 Cabrillo Way La Quinta, Cal 92253 Home Phone 760 564 5583 June 17, 2002 Dear Council Members: QC'I J • .1"03 C- e• q 6/l 8(d 1-�� I am a full time resident living at 78600 Cabrillo Way in the Rancho La Quinta Development (RLQ). My wife and I moved here in the fall of 1999. Our house is located on the fourth tee of the Jones golf course which runs along Washington Street between 48th Ave and Parc La Quinta. When we moved in there existed a five foot deep brush living fence along Washington that acted as a sound barrier. (Certainly not as good as a brick wall but better than nothing) We used our back patio for reading and entertaining. In the fall of the year 2000, without any discussion or approval, golf course maintenance people removed this barrier and rendered our back patio useless. (See attachment for reason) I communicated my dissatisfaction with this action to the Homeowners Assn (HOA) and was assured that something would be done soon. Six months later tiny ficus trees were planted with spacing between them of 30 inches. I spoke to this action at the 2001 Homeowners Assn meeting and was asked to give the trees a years growth cycle. The year was up at the 2002 Homeowners Assn meeting and I reported that the trees were no where near growing together and that we residents along Washington need some relief from this constant noise. The traffic along Washington is clearly visible from the golf course side of the fence and I Xou can see it you know that we can hear it. I have a 15 minute video of this situation which I will submit with this letter. It clearly demonstrates the inadequacy of the current situation. You can hear the traffic noise in your home even with all doors and windows closed -this was not the case before the removal of the living fence. I wrote a letter (copy attached) to Grady Sparks -president of the TDS developer. His reply (also attached) left me with no hope of them ever doing anything- Grady does not believe that a wall will help the situation ( a very convenient self serving belief -contradicted by Cal Trans which is building walls along its freeways in populated areas.) His reply directed me to you for relief. When I pursued this through Community Development, everyone would comment that they had seen the problem as they drove up and down Washington and didn't quite understand how a chain link fence could be called a living fence. It was pointed out to me that the living fence was approved many years ago and that it would not meet code and would not be approved today. It seems tome that by removing the living fence that RLQ now must meet todays code requirements just as any homeowner would have to do if they are upgrading their homes. I have noticed that across Washington Street workers are removing a very mature living fence with the plan to replace it with a wall. I'm happy for those residents but I must point out that this will only make our situation worse since we will now pick up the additional noise that is reflected from that wall into RLQ. This constant noise is unhealthy and very stressful. I'm a very peaceful person that has never had a problem with any neighbors or anyone, but I find myself wanting to go throw grapefruits at some of the louder vehicles. It is my understanding that the resurfacing of Washington is to be done with the "quiet" blacktop that was used on Jefferson. This will help with the tire noise --but not the engine noise from the trucks, motorcycles and loud cars. O�? The requirement of the wall along Jefferson and the other perimeter streets ought to be enforced on Washington. Since no sound barrier exists with vegetation, I would respectfully request that some enforcement or noise solution be mandated by the City of La Quinta. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, �ti�cQR� Bill Pierce 78600 Cabrillo Way La Quinta. Cal 5645583 M I egC � _&C� ` / D S - June 17, 2002 Grady Sparks President TD Dessert Development Inc. La Quinta, Cal. Dear Grady„ Sorry to hear that you were not feeling well and I missed you at the last Homeowners' Assn. meeting. If you remember from last years meeting , we had an extensive discussion regarding the lack of a noise barrier along the Washington Street boundary for Rancho La Quinta. You asked two things -to meet with you separately and give the recently planted trees a full growing season before evaluating them. I asked your secretary for a meeting but she never could fit me in and then it got lost in the business of everyday life. The full growing season is completed and I can tell you that the trees effectiveness as a noise barrier is still minimal . We residents have suffered for two years now with no relief in sight. When the previous barrier was removed I lost the use of my back patio completely. This removal has altered our life styles. Where once we could sit out and read and enjoy a BBQ , it is torture to attempt that exercise now. Even when the trees reach maturity, they will not provide noise relief. The ficus tree when fully mature does not have any leaves at all for the first three feet above ground. A little technical background- noise is a waveform, the louder the noise, the greater energy that the waveform contains. A wall will deflect the initial blast(containing the greatest energy) the reflected noise will get through, but of course these reflections are of considerably less energy and are more tolerable. I do believe that RLQ accepts the value of a wall since they are building walls along every other street that borders RLQ. I must point out that Washington Street carries the heaviest traffic of all the streets and should have the greatest protection, but we have none. You can still see the cars and trucks going by and if you can see them I guarantee that you can hear them. I will list the reasons I feel that their should be a wall along Washington Street: 1. With the removal of the living wall we have not had any noise protection at all. The trees that have been planted will never give the noise protection that would be acceptable and we Washington Street residents deserve the same right to use all of our property to the fullest -the same as all the other RLQ residents are enjoying. 2. RLQ has constructed walls around every other boundary street. Washington Street has the worst problem and is being totally ignored. If you think those trees will grow to maturity and solve the problem in five years then we should have a temporary barrier for those five years. 3. When the living wall was originally approved, Washington Street was not the 55mph, six lane expressway that it is now. If it is felt that the city should be responsible for the wall then. how can we apply pressure to the proper people to have them build the wall and resurface the road with the "quiet" blacktop? Even the cheap houses down Washington have had a wall constructed. 010 4. Our property values have been negatively affected by the loss of the noise barrier. The resale office doesn't seem to want to bring anyone by to even look at the properties that are listed. Where other RLQ properties have increased in value, ours have dropped. One lady, who has her house on Via Solana listed with the Resale office, called to thank me for speaking up at the HOA meeting. She was in tears because her husband is sick, they need to sell their property, and no one has been brought by to even look at her place in several months. I'm willing to do whatever it takes to get this moving. I would be willing to try to get people involved financially if that would help. Possibly we can have the homeowner pick up a proportional cost based on frontage to Washington Street This condition has existed for far too long now and I would like to know what I can do to help solve this problem? Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, W.B. Pierce 78600 Cabrillo Way La Quinta, Cal 011 T-.,df 4 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: JUNE 18, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Demand Register Dated June 18, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Approve Demand Register Dated June 18, 2002 BACKGROUND: Prepaid Warrants: 49720 - 497521 27,096.16 49753 - 497731 64,925.23 Wire Transfers} 20,546.65 P/R 8915 - 8991) 108,523.57 P/R Tax Transfers} 29,323.74 Payable Warrants: 49774 - 499341 2,860,776.40 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Demand of Cash -City Demand of Cash -RDA $3,111,191.75 $1,236,579.03 $1,874,612.72 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION CONSENT CALENDAR STUDY SESSION PUBLIC HEARING ohn . Falconer, Fin'knce pirector 0 11.. CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK TRANSACTIONS 6/01/02 - 6/12/02 6/07/02 WIRE TRANSFER - DEFERRED COMP $5,528.13 6/07/02 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS $9,721.52 6/07/02 WIRE TRANSFER - CREDIT UNION $5,297.00 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT $20,546.65 014 002 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 2:26PM 06/12/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 49774 06/12/02 &01736 R B MARCHI CONCRETE 50.00 49775 06/12/02 &01737 AUGUSTA M GILREATH 35.00 49776 06/12/02 &01738 24/7 PROPERTY REPAIR & 3.00 49777 06/12/02 &01739 EARLS AIR COND SERVICE 50.00 49778 06/12/02 &01740 ALVARO F SANDOVAL 300.00 49779 06/12/02 &01741 COACHELLA VALLEY SCREEN & 50.00 49780 06/12/02 &01742 LORI GUENTHER 4.00 49781 06/12/02 4IM100 4IMPRINT 599.45 49782 06/12/02 ABL001 ABLE RIBBON TECH 397.90 49783 06/12/02 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 433.52 49784 06/12/02 ACT100 ACT GIS INC 4887.50 49785 06/12/02 ADT100 ADT SECURITY SVC INC 392.66 49786 06/12/02 AGI100 AGING COMMUNITY TEAM ACT1 50.00 49787 06/12/02 ALC050 BOB ALCALA 14.00 49788 06/12/02 AME175 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES 42.00 49789 06/12/02 ANI050 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT 210.14 49790 06/12/02 ARC100 ARCH 748.60 49791 06/12/02 AUT030 AUTOMATED TELECOM 82.50 49792 06/12/02 AVA100 AVAYA INC 1239.80 49793 06/12/02 BER150 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC 24300.00 49794 06/12/02 BES100 BEST BUY CO INC 531.64 49795 06/12/02 BNA100 B'NAI B'RITH TODAY REG 19 200.00 49796 06/12/02 BUL200 R J BULLARD CONST INC 66748.50 49797 06/12/02 CAD010 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 317.30 49798 06/12/02 CAL140 CAL CONTRACTORS SUPPLIES 310.98 49799 06/12/02 CAP025 CAPITAL REALTY ANALYSTS 3000.00 49800 06/12/02 CAP050 ROSMARY CAPUTO 280.00 49801 06/12/02 CAR070 CARDIFF LIMOUSINE INC 576.80 49802 06/12/02 CAS200 CASUELAS CAFE 400.00 49803 06/12/02 CDW050 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 195.47 49804 06/12/02 CEN010 CENTURY FORMS INC 196.50 49805 06/12/02 COA060 COACHELLA VALLEY MOSQUITO 180881.03 49806 06/12/02 COA067 COACHELLA VLLY PONTIAC 304.75 49807 06/12/02 COA081 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 478729.00 49808 06/12/02 COM015 COMPUTER U LEARNING CENTR 112.50 49809 06/12/02 COM090 COMPUTERWORKS 750.00 49810 06/12/02 CON080 CONTINENTAL HOSPITAL 89.38 49811 06/12/02 CON115 CONTRERAS CONST 3234.86 49812 06/12/02 C00300 VALI COOPER & ASSOC INC 389.60 49813 06/12/02 COR150 CORPORATE EXPRESS 111.51 49814 06/12/02 COS050 COSTCO BUSINESS DELIVERY 1379.18 49815 06/12/02 COV050 COVER GRAPHICS 6120.00 49816 06/12/02 COV065 COVERED JC 70587.00 49817 06/12/02 CVA050 CVAS 50.00 49818 06/12/02 CVMO10 C V M A C C 30.00 49819 06/12/02 DAN200 DANONE WATERS OF NORTH 263.65 49820 06/12/02 DES013 DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE 177707.50 C 017 003 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 2:26PM 06/12/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 2 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT 49821 06/12/02 DES018 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2251.96 49822 06/12/02 DES052 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED 855200.53 49823 06/12/02 DES060 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO 257.61 49824 06/12/02 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC 5291.98 49825 06/12/02 DOU200 LES DOUGLAS 458.50 49826 06/12/02 ENV050 ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCTS 15000.00 49827 06/12/02 EQUO10 DALE EQUITZ 100.00 49828 06/12/02 EXP200 EXPRESS DETAIL 870.00 49829 06/12/02 FAL050 JOHN FALCONER 1406.74 49830 06/12/02 FIR005 FIRELINE FIRE EQUIPMENT 560.27 49831 06/12/02 FIR017 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES 163.13 49832 06/12/02 FRA010 MARNI FRANCISCO 195.00 49833 06/12/02 GAT015 GATEWAY BUSINESS 1833.90 49834 06/12/02 GCS010 GCS WESTERN POWER & EQUIP 682.62 49835 06/12/02 GUY100 GUYS & GALS UNIFORMS 1306.10 49836 06/12/02 HAR100 JOHN HARDCASTLE 275.00 49837 06/12/02 HIG010 HIGH TECH IRRIGATION INC 1851.81 49838 06/12/02 HOA010 HUGH HOARD INC 109.50 49839 06/12/02 HOF100 HOFFMASTER 141.80 49840 06/12/02 HOM030 HOME DEPOT 282.99 49841 06/12/02 H00050 FAYE HOOPER 125.00 49842 06/12/02 HUG100 HUGHES, PERRY & ASSOC 3470.98 49843 06/12/02 IDE050 IDEA ART 166.50 49844 06/12/02 IMPO11 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 287243.00 49845 06/12/02 INF200 INFINITE MEDICAL EXCHANGE 111.95 49846 06/12/02 JER050 JERNIGAN'S SPORTING GOODS 678.79 49847 06/12/02 JIF100 JIFFY LUBE/AFMS 47.46 49848 06/12/02 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 13800.00 49849 06/12/02 KIR010 TOM KIRK 80.44 49850 06/12/02 KRI100 BRUCE KRIBBS CONSTRUCTION 5750.00 49851 06/12/02 KUS050 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 690.90 49852 06/12/02 LAB100 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 1584.10 49853 06/12/02 LAQ015 LA QUINTA BASKET CO 37.71 49854 06/12/02 LAQ040 LA QUINTA CHAMBER COMMERC 150.00 49855 06/12/02 LAR025 LARSEN GOLF CARS 160.00 49856 06/12/02 LES020 JANELLE LESLIE 4.20 49857 06/12/02 L00010 LOCK SHOP INC 194.38 49858 06/12/02 LOW100 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC 17.84 49859 06/12/02 LUN050 LUNDEEN PACIFIC CORP 66981.06 49860 06/12/02 MAD100 MADISON DEVELOPMENT 23737.50 49861 06/12/02 MCDO10 MC DOWELL AWARDS 312.96 49862 06/12/02 MDS100 MDS CONSULTING 3407.76 49863 06/12/02 MEE100 WAYNE MEEDS 75.00 49864 06/12/02 MIN010 MINUTEMAN PRESS 1400.75 49865 06/12/02 MIR020 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIP 178.54 49866 06/12/02 M00085 MOORE ELECTRICAL CONT INC 50.00 49867 06/12/02 MUN010 MUNI FINANCIAL SERV INC 3967.09 49868 06/12/02 NAT006 NATIONAL ASSOC OF SCHOOL 375.00 49869 06/12/02 NAT015 NATIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING 95.00 010 004 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 2:26PM 06/12/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 3 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME PAYMENT AMOUNT 49870 06/12/02 NAT250 NATURE CONSERVANCY 78981.50 49871 06/12/02 NAW010 RON NAWROCKI 2250.00 49872 06/12/02 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 7112.59 49873 06/12/02 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 1956.29 49874 06/12/02 PER010 RONALD A PERKINS 26.63 49875 06/12/02 PET200 P F PETTIBONE & CO 499.72 49876 06/12/02 PFL100 PFL AUDIO 2625.00 49877 06/12/02 PIT100 NOEL PITTMAN 56.00 49878 06/12/02 POW100 POWERS AWARDS 12.78 49879 06/12/02 POW300 POWER PERSONNEL INC 1543.16 49880 06/12/02 POW400 POWERSIDE BATTERY 96.98 49881 06/12/02 PRI020 THE PRINTING PLACE 1409.37 49882 06/12/02 PUR100 PURKISS ROSE-RSI 93.46 49883 06/12/02 RAD050 RADIO SHACK 29.06 49884 06/12/02 RAL050 RALPHS GROCERY CO 164.50 49885 06/12/02 RAS020 RASA - ERIC NELSON 3733.50 49886 06/12/02 RAS035 CHARLOTTE RASHMI-GRAFF 749.00 49887 06/12/02 REL100 RELIANT FUND-RAISING 180.69 49888 06/12/02 RES005 RESERVE ACCOUNT 4000.00 49889 06/12/02 RIV034 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CLERK 21.00 49890 06/12/02 RIV081 RIV COUNTY HEALTH SERVICE 73.00 49891 06/12/02 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS 126825.15 49892 06/12/02 RIV120 RIV COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT 96682.02 49893 06/12/02 ROB175 H G ROBB 280.00 49894 06/12/02 ROB200 SCOTT ROBERTSON 178.50 49895 06/12/02 ROS010 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP 29896.13 49896 06/12/02 RUT050 RUTAN & TUCKER 73841.43 49897 06/12/02 SAW010 STAN B SAWA 377.50 49898 06/12/02 SCI100 LOUISE SCIUTTO 120.00 49899 06/12/02 SKI050 SKILLPATH SEMINARS 598.00 49900 06/12/02 SMA010 SMART & FINAL 168.86 49901 06/12/02 SOCO10 THE SOCO GROUP INC 118.06 49902 06/12/02 SOU007 SOUTHWEST NETWORKS, INC 3646.92 49903 06/12/02 SOU030 SO CALIF ASSOC GOVERNMENT 2179.00 49904 06/12/02 SOU033 SOUTHERN CAL ASSOC CODE 60.00 49905 06/12/02 SPA100 THE SPANOS CORPORATION 5159.04 49906 06/12/02 STA010 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT 2834.02 49907 06/12/02 STA050 STAPLES 170.07 49908 06/12/02 STE003 M W STEELE GROUP INC 17820.53 49909 06/12/02 SUN069 THE SUNDSTROM COMPANY 7260.00 49910 06/12/02 SUN075 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY 256.00 49911 06/12/02 SUN080 SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP 2100.00 49912 06/12/02 SYM050 SYMANTEC CORP 19.95 49913 06/12/02 TKDO10 T.K.D. ASSOCIATES INC 1334.90 49914 06/12/02 TOP010 TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 3739.30 49915 06/12/02 TOT100 TOTAL FABRICATION 420.38 49916 06/12/02 TRIO10 TRI LAKE CONSULTANTS INC 23800.00 49917 06/12/02 TRI100 TRI STATE LAND SURVEYORS 375.00 49918 06/12/02 TTI100 TTI NATIONAL INC 7.99 017 005 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 2:26PM 06/12/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 4 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT 49919 06/12/02 URB100 PETER URBON 4008.13 49920 06/12/02 USH100 USHERWOOD & ASSOC OF CAL 165.98 49921 06/12/02 USPO10 U S POSTMASTER 37.00 49922 06/12/02 VAL005 VALLEY ANIMAL CLINIC 80.00 49923 06/12/02 VOI025 VOICE EX 235.00 49924 06/12/02 VON010 VON'S C/O SAFEWAY INC 115.27 49925 06/12/02 WALO10 WAL MART COMMUNITY 281.50 49926 06/12/02 WES009 WEST COAST TRANSPORTATION 682.50 49927 06/12/02 WILO10 WILLDAN ASSOCIATED 9920.00 49928 06/12/02 WIN010 WINSTON TIRES 236.42 49929 06/12/02 WOO100 DEBBIE WOODRUFF 287.00 49930 06/12/02 WOR100 WORLDCOM 1405.00 49931 06/12/02 XER010 XEROX CORPORATION 4649.29 49932 06/12/02 XER012 XEROX CORPORATION 92.67 49933 06/12/02 XER050 XESYSTEMS INC 266.00 49934 06/12/02 YOU100 YOUNG ENGINEERING SERVICE 1911.09 CHECK TOTAL 2,860,776.40 01,E II. z .-1 N .-a N M O N N O E z N x o 0 0 ,-+ r-+ c o 0 0 0 0 o H O W U' F FC O �o O to �c to lD to �o E r� m E E-F E. E+ E+ E+ E+ E E E E+ E EF E+ E a a Ln c O C. O O O O O N O N N O N r H H E z E O . O . O . O . O . O . O . v' . m . M . al . r . N . N . kO . W z D o lf) to M M o N 0 O o u-) V' Q� 01 r m r O Ui H N �O l' o m c0 >� O M N M i a O Cl o o 0 0 Cl Ln o 7. o O LL O U) !Y. o M LL' 0 O 0 O a. 0 O Q', o c F 7 O1 (7 r W In Z M W W Ln E o M W In (L z z IT rn M O > O O O cn O O w > z O H a (4 W H a H a W ❑ H a U CL IL `o H a } coa w a ❑ z a a m w a m w a H H a F( co w a a s m a a a z O z H E-F O O O F O z H E-E O z H F. O a D E. O z H E. O r.0 i" E O Z w E O F O W H m F IL E m E CO E U E+ m E H E+ > E E+ H w m a H a w x Dm a m a w x a x z (z co x m m m m m m O > H 4 n O ❑ Inn O ❑ O ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ O ❑ z < O (] w H O ❑ w H w H w H w H W H W H z U z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z a z a a a a a a H m W O Cu W > O E. W > D w w > D 44 W > D lay W > O 1. W > D f-4 w > m E w > W CL W > 04 Da IL GL m CL CL m 4L W m (L W O w a. W a. w 04 w z w w a w a o N D m D m D m D m D m D m D m W 1-4 U W H ❑ a O > I > W m O O M In N a' c M Ln r z z E c to M Ol N r M w w r LO H ❑ H D in r r m W O 1-1 N N Ln O N H ❑ z Q' to CO N M v' OD c N M N H V' r V' r V' r M r v (- V' r H ,Y, r> z a Q m w m a 1 O o w E o O Ln o o O o o r o o o o 0 o r w m o O M 0 O o o 0 o 0 O o O u) ID o O 0 O 0 O o o o o o o c OD E D l0 01 lD lD M l0 r M ti M M M M M M z to O o O o o O o E V' N z D o O o O o O o O O O o O o o H Ln H Ln r Ln r Ln r Ln r in r in V. Ln O O O O O O O O N M M M M M M C' U O O O O O o O O O o o O o O O w W �U z w a U H W x O W W F H a > U m C. x rC w Ga] m a FC D x Ln z a x ❑ o a w cC O H E F O z FC W W W W W W W U < > W E x E w a m FC H z O m RC 3 FC 3 RC 3 FC 3 FC 3 r.0 3 a z m H U a a O a H a Cu a a W D E. z m H ❑❑❑❑❑ x a a a a O a a r a E m a m o a w x m H a a x a x x x a x x a o m a > a a E wa w w w w w w a m ❑ z D a a o o H m c U U U U U F-E lu w z 0 O > o M r M m M rn M O v' H T N c o O H O o o 0 o o o O >� U E r r r r r H r r H o a 0 W 0 W 0 w o w o W o ♦ w UU H o oa ow a ow ) O m U U U U U U y i, 007 z c Ln lc r m m O M v' N rH N ID M a' uN 1D r O F Z N O N '-1 N x �D U •--4 O O O O O O C U ID �o ID �o �o ID �D W �o �o �o W W E E E. E+ E. E. E-E E E E-E E E+ E. F F F F F Ln a M N M O O O O M M O O O O v r M O O •--� H m M Q• v r r N m m O O O O r+ m r if) m z E W z N a1 .--I 01 r r 01 M O c N O .--I lD N O) E O N v .-i M m O C) O r N •-1 V' r m M N 04 clj W N O lD O O O C' O O M r N O v N O m N M m D) to '-I ct' r-I V. m V m c M N r m 3 aC H a z m ❑ H a w a a W a a a a a a a U a a o a a ❑ a a a a z E z F H ❑ E H O H E+ E+ E 0 0 ¢ o o O O 0 0 o O O a W H E E E-E E. CL EH x EE a F. H H F H U F m U U U H O m U U U a H a m m m m m m x H x > > > x x x E x Il m x >> x > a 01 O H W W W W w W O m O m m m O m O U O C7 O W O m m O m O W > x H H H H H H ❑ m ❑ ❑ x ❑ ::) O z ❑ H ❑ ❑ ❑ z U a a a a a a z z F. .F. x z w z x z H z a z x x z x z W H m w as w D. w a W W x a x w w W E. w x w as W w w W w w z w a a a a a a> cn > r.0 Q r.0 > x> m> O> a> C7 C7 > 0> O ❑ .7 a :D .7. O .'J H a a a w z O a) a Q r.0 x k m m m m m m c7 (C r1 a E H pa m a a, a a U W l0 m m m 1 (V D) .--� H ❑ m m r I in M V' O W N N N -w rl N w r-1 N > I > pj m m r M(71 1 m m m M O M O r �O z z .E M O m m m m (N �o \o C if) ID D) N O M H O H O N m 14 Ln Ln N O M M .-+ r O M N H z v' M M M M O Lr) u) O f-1 O M ID if) r ❑ r r r r- r r N 1n 1n N a s N x a z a < m w ao x 1 O 0 I F x r r r r Ir r m O O O O N ID O O O m W V' Vr Vw c v O v' v V' O m m •--1 l0 w �D O £ m m m m m m �D lD lD %D O u) if) m lD lD lD \D 'J M M m M M M m D1 (n O) m m al M Ln Ln to O) z O O O O O O O O O O V' O O O M M M O E r r r r r r D ID lD lD l0 ID D D w 10 z M M M M M M N M v N N N r-1 M M M M m O in Lr) N in to 1n O Ln to O O O O Uf) in N 1n Lr) OU c v V' 'a' c c' in a -v N N N M M O O O O N H rH 1-4 rH O 1-1 O r-I O In O O O O O O O O O O r-4 O r-1 r-1 El m U W r.0 m x H 2 2 2 z W M H H H WZ" O E a E O U U U fU-1 O co u) W a v) Elz 01 W w w w w w w r N N z a W w 1 x x x x x a U E F E+ O O W E < FCC r.0 < < < < z H H H E Q I.. x W E 3 3 3 S 3 3 H x x x a a ❑ U .a z ❑❑❑❑❑❑ o 0 0 0 z U W z pq H 'J x x x x x x m U U U U U < E H rC w w w a :% >4 m m m 0 Q W < O W W W W W W F E+ F E 1z-1 W W H U U E-F Q a ❑ U U U U U U U ❑❑❑ U O w D W FC FC FC RC RC FC rC < < < < O zz W > F k. z O > O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln O O O O O :D O r-1 '-1 1-1 r-1 H rH O O O O O N r Ln O O M O U El U H O w u O W U O W U 0 W U 0 W U 0 w U rH E+ L) E. ❑❑❑ E. ElH c� O U a - W �d O H z r-I a fH s O r-1 > U a a a a a a a a a a 008 z r O r-4 N M O T m m m O H N In w M O T N N N N H N O E. z N O N ,-I M x U O H .H .--4 H O .-i T T 0 0 0 0 H ,-I O T O 0 o W C7 E+ FC .o l0 ID lO w to H l0 H to ID to to w O l0 O to H t0 H t0 H to to ko H ko H �D H kO O �o .v tD a s m E H E+ E E+ H E E E E E E H E F E E E LO T O O O M O O O ti 00 m N CDO N O O H H O CD O m M O C. N O 0l O O T O m O a• O O z E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W z C. O O O r1 M o O r 00 r r \o N O U> o O 0 ,E O O O O O .� O T N O N r N H O co i+ O H O N If) .--1 N r M O N 0 0 T 0 o O m 0 O o to O ifl M O1 0 rn x 0 O a m r o 0 M a O M N O M N N 0: r M M O r 3 T to M N CG 1D U W H H a a m x a a w w a a a a a m a a a a z E-U Cu [++ E O ZD O F H F F F H W H 0 0 > o a a 0 o m o 0 o w 0 U E to t U E- H W W E H z E El w ElE H E z a O H W a E W W a a a a U) a 0 a cn cn M rn rn rn cn U a 0 a r.>: a E 0 H 0 U x x 0 w w o H 0 Cl) 0 E E x x x x E E O a o co o U > z 7. U ❑ z U U ❑ z H o H o ❑ E z x ❑ z % w ❑ z Ix 0 a 0 z 0 OL 0 OG 0 Qx 0 a 0 a 0 ❑ U' z ❑ z H ❑ O z a H Un w H z z w f1 4L W W W G. W fs Ga 4, Gu G. w w w W A4 W CY. w E+ W > z 4 R > x x > > > I. > H H H H H H H H > Cr > IL > m ❑ 0 a .a 0 0 ❑ w z z z z z z z z 0 a z U aL C4 U U rY, h C o 0 0 o O O a W Cu U W H ❑ (1 to O 0 W N Lrn T T > I > m M r T r O m r r m N M m O O M m z z Y: LO m m N (n T ri - r M m M m m T 00 H ❑ H O N N N M O) m M M N M M M N N N 1 H z In Lo In N N O m m M r-I M M N N ❑ N N N O r M .--I N to to �o l0 l0 ko to O rC z 04 rC m w m a I 0 O w E (� o r r O O O O O O CD CD O O r O N W O LO U') CD CD Ln O O O CD CD 00 0 T O O1 O �� O O O Ln N O O O O O O C O O O In � O M O) O) U') Ln M m r r r r r r r r (11 Ln O1 z O O 0 U') Lf) T O O O O H ko m m to 10 w to w to to to w �o r l0 10 z H N N (n to N O T Cl) r r M en M T T r1 N ,7 LO LO In ul Lr) 0 m Lr) Ln LO U') N LO ul Ln L O O 0 T T T T T N w T T M M T T T T T T N 1-1 r•C coo O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ri H T r-1 rl H H ,--I H .-1 ri H e-i rl 01 H (n W U) W z z z U a tF H a a a a a a a a a a M R. fL Wcu a, CL 0 FC FC FC FC H P1 w a a a a. a a n a, n z o C9 C'J C7 ❑ ca O O O D D D O D FC l H H H U U O z 7 (n fn cn (n O !n O O (n a z z z z z E o a N o r•C w W W H H U £ E E � £ E E £ O F F O O E, ❑ O O O O O O O O U r� a F w w w U U a a Cu G. 6l Gu [a 44 1. E. r1 w W Q, H H H N H H H H aG w U a a z o z z z >4 >+ - m a z ❑ z o z 0 z 0 z 0❑ z z o z 0 E a❑o m 5 o a a >' 0t >' >" >' H m PPPPHPHP U E < z a a 1% H H < W W W W W W W W H a s 0 x a ox rn rn z h ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ a a m m a a a a a a a � a o U)z E G+ W m m m m ao a U U U U U U U U U U a z 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O (D 0 0 0 u) 0 O N N Lr) O O O O N o .-4 N O O O O O 0 0 O .ti O O UP Z a. W O to RC a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ n a m o. 21 U H W W W W w z o FC <<<< a 4 a; < < U m m m m m m m U U U U U U U U U U U 009 z v Lo r N ID r r N m a N r w m N N N N N m m m m m m m u) ol E z N O N \ x tD U a' O O O O O O O O O O c CD E.0 O .--I 0 r-i rl r-1 ri H rl ' r H .o O Elko IDEQ o � Eo E, El E ElE H F E. E E E F F F F F c O O O w r-1 m r O m Ln m N O O m rl E V' v' o L) D• �o m c 10 r r N O M Z E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W z O m O O C C .-1 m r V' m o N O to E O m m O kD m 01 o O r O l0 w .--1 LO m �+ O N N v .-i r-I N 'D M r-1 to w N 6 ri kD N u) ri M C. O O r O O O O o m o c n cD o r o L) o C. ko o x Ln w ri i c (n N D o m r H O U a) D1 O O m O N N N U') N L) , v 1, r-1 - m M o o r .--I x r to H ❑ ❑ o I I m U O 3 z z m 0 a to N N o o c m o °\° a F H 'E- ❑ ❑ 0 w a w z to N N z .a z z a O .a x E .a W co a .] D: .] .7 .7 H .1 co a o o a w a to w a ❑❑ a o o a H a x x a a z a ❑ z H H H E x E. W U E Cr W E+ Z Z E-E a H a a E E. H E z O O E E O U O ❑ a 0 a a 0 x x 0 w 0 x x 0 O 0 a E-F E.z E E U U F+ EH H F E E El E. E.rA O F H E W a O H W a D: tz fz r7 a to W w to m m to to a [z to to z E+ % w W O H o 0 0 0 O a rz 0 to CO 0 to U O w 0 O t) O U O x o to > D; ❑ D. D. ❑ a ❑ w ❑ W w ❑ a a ❑ a ❑ a a ❑ o ❑ o ❑ H Z H U to Z W to W Z W EE to Z W a W S Z z W z H z H z W D+ D+ z W U H Z a W D+ Z W a H Z W O .a z U W fz O > rzr�� rzr�� > H F > x > rz !z D D> a a> W> < z> 5> x to E F r, W U m m E E+ > E E+ H O W W W U W o H ❑ a .� ri r 0 W r i i rn N Ln > I > W V' c m w m c N tD z z E at m m N N N to N H ❑ H o r r r N N N U M H Z N N >+ >+ N N U r ❑ N N ru k. Ln Ln t.7 N a z a a w w w a I 0 o w E O r-1 1-1 (N N O O o) O O N O O W 1D tD O ri ri w %D o O -�T O O m O O rolD 1D O m m Lo N O O w O O LO o O O m M M m m D1 (r N N cn .i r-1 D1 r M z O O O O N N .-1 N (N O m O tD 1D r r r lD lD co m lD m m ID �D r E z H ri N N N N N 5 N U) O O O O O O O O O O O O o O N N N L) u) M M T D1 N cr) a, N N N U .-i ri H N N N r-1 N rl a O O o O O O O O O o O O O o O LO In r-I r-1 m m to m m '-I LO .� O O D F E+ E H H Z U U a s w w U H H O O E+ o E E Z 3 S W W z Z U U O H o Z Z H H Z z >. > a >+ >+ z In H H H H w W w w (z 6� CO m F H .] .7 >+ r-7 .7 a a a o w z z n ro a s a a s w 0 0 w w w E a s a a s a E E a E E x >> > >> H o w a s a s w w a s a a s .a z cn w w PO H w w a >> >. >+ a s a a s w a o r.4 w a 0 0 OG 0: w w w w w E N a H H w 0 tD o o x x x x x o KC z ❑❑ O E4 E4 U U U U U W a, a 0 D a to 3 3 Z Z a s a a s E a ❑ a s a ❑❑ w W o 0 0 0 0 O to z U U 0 U U U U U U U U U U E+ ru z 0 w > o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o .-a v) r r O In Ln .--I .-/ ID ID lD m m rl 0 i O O N o O O O O O O O O O O F Cz a to S S z z a s a a s E U H a s a ❑ ❑ W w 0 0 O O O O a U U U U U U U U U U U U U U o O m m O O U D O•�� 0010 z m m O1 N M C m m O r-1 N M v to lD to to O to N H H H M M cT Q' C V' V' V' V' .� r m H O E+ Z N O N H \ U �p U r1 O O a v' C O O O O O O O O O V' O O v O W F '-1 r-1 o o o o .-1 H o c� a 1D \D w w w w�o ID ID �o �o w�o ID w w to £ a rQ E E F, E E F+ H F E+ E E E E F E E+ E 4 E E-F a a to c lD O O N M v' N a' M to O O O v O O O O H H m m m N v m N O to w r c M M v O O O O z H w z a' c V O w Vw O to 10 O r c to N m 0 r O O £ O M cn ON m H H 1 1 "a, V' O c H m N N m to M >+ O N .-+ I M to M r-1 r-I to a M LD O a r W D o m o 0 0 M m O O O rn c rn rn 0 r 0 m M m H r N m to N M H M H ul E+ M 1 to O r m a a 44 H a z w m a a s H H a a a cn a a a a a s a a a 4 a H a 0 a z EE S E H F F H F. a F Z F q E+ m O O W O m rn O O O U O W O O W H E+ m E. E+ E+ E.+ W E. q E+ a, E x IDx H 0E1 x M x 0 0 x MMMMMMMIX m m cn m m x S x x x r°n O H 0 \ 0 m m O W W W W W W W 0 w w w w W 0 w O 0 m O H > x 0 E. 0 x x 0 F-1 H H H H H H 0 H H. H H 0 4 O N 0 x 0 > z u z w z w w z 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 z a a a a a z u z to z w z x H m w w w E. a. w w a w w a, w a, W a, a, a, W a. W H W w cQ w w w > x> w w> w a, a, a, w a, at > a a a w w> x> w> £> w q E. W W m U D U O m O m a 0 O W > W D m m h h m m m m m m m m m m m m > a £ m w a. U w CD O N N m �D o 1 I I I 1 O H q x w M O g m a O N N to m m I U W N N m m lD to r r r r N N H M > I > CQ to v to m w - to lD lD lO N N r i z z £ N N r m M N O O O O M M m N H q H O H O O r O m r m tD lD w m m to O H Z lD r r M M N M N N N V' v v C' v' I o q ID N N M M M M M M M N N N N Nu N H AG a z a a w w oa x 1 O O w H x M O O O O O O O O O N CDN O M O O w to O O O O (D O O O O O w m (D ow m V' Ln O O p7 to O N O O O O O O O m m O m m ID to O O O Ol Qt Ol H .1 .-1 .-1 .-i r-1 r-1 M M M M M 01 01 01 r Z O O O O O O o 0 0 0 O O O O O .-a O M tD l0 l0 r r r r r r r r r r r r ID w tD kD F z N m m H H H H N N N M M N M M r1 N N M q H m m O O O O O O O to u') to to to O at O O 0 r w ID N N N to tD v t-1 U a O 00 O O O O O O o O O O O O O o O O C' q. zr H H 1-1 H H H H H H •-/ .-i - to V' H H U U x x x a a z H H H H H M O O W W W W W O m m m m m m m m m q 0 Oo t F a s W W W rm:] Gm ] W W m m m m m a4 m x x x x x x x m m m m m m a z w w w u, a4 a a, u, u, w w w w w 0 x x x x x x x z z z z z i I U x x W W W W W W W H H H H H x 04 W F m W a W W w W W W W n n n n n h o u �a �a a o a� 0 0 0 0 0 w N a x O O O O O O O u u u u u x x a x F H H w a, a, a, a, a, a H H F E E. w w a s 0 z a s x x x x x x x m m m m m > > a 0 0 a s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 U > > U U U U U U U U U U U U U U F W W z 0 > to O o O 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 O 0 o d) q H O 0 to to to to to to 0 to to to to to to tD 0 M M r-1 H H H H ,-1 H 0 0 0 O O O O O F z O O x x x x x x x m m m m Cl) > > U H O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 a U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U u U U a £ a > U U O 0 to H 0 0 /{� U u O Jr-3 0011 z r m rn o . N M c Ln w r m m r m m m O O Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln �n vl 'r io N O F z N O N r \ D O U O O CD O O O O O O v) v c O O O H O H C) o W E. .o ID � H ,-+ o O O � � H O RC w lD w � ID �Ll to ID lD w t0 l0 w � � l0 w � m � ID � w � l0 ID £a W W E FF E+ E+ E. H H H H E E E E E E E+ E+ E+ E. c O LO o O r 01 01 CD M r r v' CD m O O H F O H N Ln r r O c Ol Ln w �D r H N v r l0 Ln O C. Z E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W z M O O r r vl N O O r Ol in M m r r m O £ O r-1 m l0 O Cl) m M r N m O M r N u'1 0 O H r H N 0 N N N m r m r- r W c c O < a r Ln .� CC) O Un O ID M m O O 10 to 0� LN 10 a1 N o M r + o r H m E- (Y) t0 N O Ln N O in m Lr) V N O r N O N F N N c z I r N I In z Ln H r in W S O (Z' m F ❑ ❑ H 3 z z 5 \ N N a a a a a a a a a a U 7 7 «a W FC W W w rS O RC � W C rt; N Z H El E EE E a E- F E a E a E U U U U U U Ft F E H O O a a a p x 0 o x 0 O >> V) O Cl) o a W H F 3 5 3 E El El El E E a F W W W V1 M m M W F a F H O O IV -I W a U' U 0 a Ul a a U) a E a E+ F+ H F E+ F a E a FC O H O z z z 0 O O O W O U O U ur� ur� ur� u u O U o E+ a r r r r c Do to Z V z `.4 J4 14 z a z E E-E E+ E E Z Z a z fY. a s fx 9 z a z H (/l W z z z W W x x x x O W W F w E+ E+ E+ F F H W F W n] W .7 H H H '.� > (� C.7 C.7 (� (� 'J > (n > z z Z z z z > Ul > H ❑ m a a H H H H H "L' O o O o p p z p (n coo E+ .4 4 .- 44 E+ H U U V U U U H W w U w W I I I o 0 0 o O in ❑ a V' Ln M I I I I I M O p 0 W m u; 1r N m 0 c� O z I z 0) 0l O 0 Ln c N m M 01 0 Z z 2: E 01 01 O in O N m M o N M M O H ❑ H o In l0 .-I Ln N N C �O CD O M M O M M m I H Z N N N N N H 01 at Ol 0� a1 m m Q• � N o rl ri .-i l0 w �O l0 w ID ID l0 H .Y. FC z a r.0 U7 w w a 1 O O m E- (y) O O a FCC I W E- a z r.� O � a a a H w z o O O >+ U E. U U a N N N O o W m m m O O W m m m O O E O M M M r c z O O O N N r r r m m E+ z M M M c a O un Ln Ln O O O .-i .-i .-1 m 01 U U N N r� O o C. o O r H H M M w w a a O U N H H z 0 E O U F a O of o w o W M r O M W 0 s m r a a a O O O z z 2 [a� [a� Cu 0 0 0 a a a F F F 3 3 3 W W W 0 0 0 a a � ❑ ❑ o 0 0 0 O O O N N N r r r r r C' cT OD m m m m M M M M M O O O O O r r r r r N �fl u) to �n v c c vr 0 0 0 0 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a o D o a ❑ � W � � � U V U U U H H H H H E F F F E U U U U U a a a a a W W W W W H a a a a w w w w w U) 0 0 0 0 0 m m m m m O O O O O w Cu Z 0 ❑ O F a w w ❑ N N O W 0 O ul M N N 0 0 U 0 z x a m 0 a z O W E. a w w 0 O O w w ❑ a' c O O N O O O M M 01 O in in O O Lfl in un O in Ln M M n kn D1 N O O O O O O O Ol - - rA H H V' N to Ln LO ul in in U-) O O N N N M N al o v o 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U z z z z z z H H H H H H m cn cn m vl cn a a a a a a E E Eco W W W W W W F E E F F F za a a a a w w w w w w N N N 0 O O O O O O N M M W m u41 LD ) 0 o C] wo 0 a C7 O 0 ❑ W a O OLn N O O O U) F U ❑ ❑ 0 a a a H z W E O a z w O O Z W O 0012 z M O C' to H to r m �o H m O M a l0 w �o N w to N ID ID �o 01 N r N O H z N O N H \ r x U o 0 o V• o o H O O o CD a o o o W F O H H H H CD CD H 0 C7 Q to t0 m wto F, ko ko ID �oto E � m E0 F E. H El HP F E0 F F H E H p P H E- C) O O c' ' 0 m CY)H O O N O O H H o 0 0 r m o 0 cm)ff H � O rn H o Z H w z O n H v N m v 0 M N M N �O N E O O Ln H O m m N M ID 0l M m O r 7+ O H v' C Ln H H ul in H H m kD M N a O O O d' r M O O N O O 1i O r N H O 1l 1D H 0 z O O 3 m O M Ln M N l0 0 H o r m 0 0 w ko rn am m o O I% H m W ❑ <1' N H H m M T) Q O z H H H o H W Z H w x U z v a w U 0 0 z m H I.c U w O W W \ a H a a H> U a a W a a W a a s a W < 4< F E r•C E W U K4 < H RC < a H< > o a o 0 0 o a o o R( > c" 11 o a H W fY. a a W £ a E-E E-E a E a a a a co a O H O 0 0 W W O a H W 0 x x 0 O W O >+ O w 0 F� 0 > a o z o .4 .4 ❑ a z o W w❑ win UM <❑ w❑ o a H H w w Ow w iz+ U) w w > J44 a> w x x> w > E E r4 > w Z W [Z w Ewa > W > a> w w H> w w W> w H> > w ❑ < w W [4 W W H H H O H ry 3 z U) a >> H a x a w w U co 0 F W r.. U w H O O . w w m r o > I > m rn o w w ID w r H H Z 2 ID N N H to H ❑ H H H H H M M M M H z z r r o 0 o u) N N ❑ v c M M c r x H H x At z a ry m w m a I o 0 w E a' O CD O N O M M O O O mO CDw O - Vo - CD �o H CDH H m O O c O O m O �O w l0 O �D m O to to m O O �O O O x O a) m Ol r Ln M r O1 O) M H un 01 r M z O H H M M O M O O O Ln H H c+) 0 0 0 0 ko r w ID ID E+ z H H H H M N H r N Cl) H N H Cl) o O Ln O O Ln Ln O Ln N O N Ln O O in 0 O M ul N H H N H M N H N N In M O U U H H H H H N H H H H H N H H H r.� O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H In In H H In H H H H H ui In H H a H H H O z z O W W (n W � E W cn a a U w £ M H H H a o a s a m w Ln W W W O co 3 H W la4ra-i H Wu a C A~ a W W z a w E- N E F z z z z H H U U z 4c H w W O O O O w w H z 0 W a U W E. H 0 ❑ U U U U O W a z D a a a a W W x a F U' a m H Od m m rC FC rC z z U [� >+ m KCFC O w m to w w w w H H < W w x a S � !Y. W a m z z z z W W v z w W z a< o a a s x x x x rz I4 x a H m >. x a ❑ < x x 0 0 0 0 H H H a U o 0 z ❑ W w h h ti ID w w w U' U U' h F w [j z 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tn un r 0 Ln 0 0 0 1� /� O H O O O o in N 00 H H H H O O o >� O N N O O O O O O O O O O H H on O F U H O a a s a a a a cr z L1'. r.0 Fl U H ri O H ri 1-1O ri rD H H rl H O H 0 E a a W F E F F-� F F E, F E- E El F P F E- F P F E E E F a a a w Z M H m .-1 1n O to O O m ri W 01 v ON r N to V' lD r N r H H O rn N ri r m c M O o tl') N m rn O r O N lD lD O o M C rn H H m m r m 7+ a O m .-i H ri C' M H N r a O O H m O O m ON 01 O O OD O1 O u') m N O O to tT U) r N z 0 H H to OD rl 01 O H H c 1-4 N m N to N H z W X E. O r V' f`') lO lD H M c Nu r > H ri H E. .a-1 H [Y. m N m u) a N a U a E z a a a m z a a H a a s a a a a a a a a s a a H a a a O s a w z O F O H F O 0.4 W El O F O E O E O W W E O F O E. v) F O 0: E E. O U E E O F+ a E. E. H O F H E.F z E O F Ei H O d H w O H E. C4 O ow z 0 In W Z O m w m w to w O w N w m w w O F U D: O U' Z D: O W w D; O O cn D; O U mG O a a > z cr U a z a U' O z 0 U 0 z H a a z H a H a H a H a H a H a p z O % a z W a z O x a z DG w a z a s z a GQ H w w w > H Z w > D; w > a a. w > n. w u. n. D. u4 a. a4 a a. D. w w > E co w > N F w > U O w > u.t w w > H w > CO O U) 0 a H H a Ui 0 m 0 m n m 0 In 0 m D m z H H U a P] w �-D z a O k. W Cu U W 0 w to m M ID m H lD tT N N Q' rw V H wO N N > I Z H q > z H co E O V' H MID lD O r O tf) v H v) O m H H O N H O N ri M I l0 ID - V' to x 0 4 U) CD O m w O H p H x Z to LO c M H ri a O r ri v O to O c CDto c ri M O C4 O) U N kD CD o w < m w w D: I 0 0 w Ei x W o O 0 ri o O r v' r c o O r to N M M N a) o O o O M to M m o O W E O m m O m m m to O O Ln LO O O z 01 O 01 O M O M O M O N O M O M O M O 01 O M O r c 01 O kD tT O D M O r Ei z O O V' to c N O N N O N M to v to c M to v M to c to c M to v N O N N O H r. to N m m D M to M M to N v a o ri 0 H 0 ri 0 ri 0 ri 0 r-I 0 r-1 (D 0 H 0 0 H C) 0 r-1 0 ♦-1 0 ri 0 (D 0 0 U z E V) W (7 z to a O H z U O H p a x U 0 0 M a) O W Z O to F cD H a a a H a a a. Z H H a m a W E x O a: U W E. O H O H O H O H O H O W a w w H N a z [A H U W a 0 E v) 0. W IL W a, W a1 W 0L W CL W O 0 F 0L a a W E z a N a E+ x O p p p p p x W a a Z a0i a u. a a 0 x 0 x 0 w w w E w E w E w E w E w E w > x U a W w ul H r.. z a a p H a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 a p E z w F z O O 0 W > O ri O O H O O O r-4 0 M 0 0 M 0 0 M 0 0 M 0 0 M 0 O M O O to O O ri O - to O r-/ H cm) O O N O to A I� Al O U E 0 a 6. E x x£ E£ O U W a4 C. 1% �w U H a U H x O x O x O x O x O x O x O x O x 0 x o x p H x H z H w rD 0014 z O r H N M T In m O1 O H m Ol N Cl) T In �o to r r.� M r M M M M M r r m m N N co m OJ 00 co M M f� O E Z N O N e-1 �o ^/JI U T o T T T T T O o 0 0 o o O o O T T O W F+ C. H O O O o o H H O O f.7 RC �o �o ID w ID %D w l0 �o ko �o ko w w ko ID �o W w £ Q m E E E+ E+ E+ F E F E E E F E E E E F E+ E. E. a a T ID 0 0 o O o r Lr)0 CDT O 0 0 0 0 o H 0 ,-, Elrn T o 0 0 0 o H r- r o T o 0 0 o rn r o z W E. z O r O O O In O Ol M r N N In O O H O1 T r O £ O Ol T T H O r O N m CO r O N O In T T m M In >. O N In In m O I --I H \o m M N lO H T N In 14 < M M N N I M N H a rn ID 0 T 0 O o H r T O T 0 rn 1- rr m r a x H o 0 0 o v r 0 r T m O H a a a ❑ O fn m m N Ol 00 M O �O W Q, < 4 a W 00 a. a r V) N a U CV H hi H £ M W W In -4 FC W U U U z z O 0V' OH a O 0 N W W W << m X < a a O£££❑ a s x W o a s N W a a NN 0 Q a H l!) a a x O M H z z z a U U .a a H a O .a a a O rS E< W > W H H H W H O ---- O W O U O a 0 O W W H z F E m a F a a F < W E. WE- E+ U W W ° a H w W Qc a H H H R\ U U U a. W W a U x a U % W 04 .4 a O H E O W O W W O O H a 0 O E O ly O > a ❑ a E z W W W 00 a a❑ w 40 a U❑ ❑ 0❑ H a W H W z z za a W > W U W E O W z W W W E. > > H > > ❑ > Fry E0 > 00 > > 00 W < W O [,❑] W W W d (� fx .W] a to E+ > Cu £££ a 0 0 0> E E W M m E w w m W w U W o co M D I -I ❑ m Ill to O W 0 m H r 00 T > 1 > m O w In T m w T M M M w m r N O In N z z £ r T N N O Ot m m m m IT l0 m O m N N O H ❑ H O O N N N �o N M M f+1 M N U H O N O m H H z �o m In In T In In In In In In £ O N N O N X ❑ O N .-� H H H .-i ri H .-� r-i a H -1 H H N m H x z a < m w m x I O O w E (x O 01 N N N W N N N N l0 O O O O O In r O W O T N N N M N N N N M O O O M m m H In O m O l0 m m m In m m m m u) O O O ko In In m �D O O M O1 Cl) M M In r M M .-1 0 M fo r z O .� O 0 T T 0 O O 0 T -T T O 0 O M O N O 0 O O lO M r o o co �o io o �o kD io o �o ko r c o E z M H M N N .-I M In N M H H O T M ri r1 N H M O In O O O O In O O O O In O O In In O O In In O O N u1 .-' a• 01 N H O) 01 H N T O T T M M M N U U In In ID In r.� o O O O o O O o O o O O O o o O o o O O H In H T T H H T T H H ri H H H H H H H H C7 C7 U C7 C7 z Z U ❑ z z z z z z z z z O O a O U7 a7 U7 O (n (n U7 !n O H H W O H H H H H H H H H E E C7 F+ F+ El E E E+ E+ E+ F U U U a rx x a a x rz o x O O z o C7 W W W W W W W W W 0: a H 0 U M z > > > > > > > > > E F+ U U U O H ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ L] ci ❑ ❑ U) M z z >I a O E Q ry r.0 FC �C FC RC RC RC z z H H E- U) 0 a W m a O a a a a a a a a a U U cn 0 a x < a Ea a a a a a a a a a s o U) 1 m m rn m m z z m U tC m W ❑ ❑ O O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ m no C7 (D >. W E - m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H H H a z z o O O O O O O O O O x x oG a M co W F El m H rC a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a s x x r-4 ££ H H >+ o H >4 x a x x a a x a x x x w w O 0 U) O O r.� z z E. W W W W W W W W W U U F+ E a d a r.( 0 a w z z z z z z z z z ££ o a U) U) m a ❑ W H H H H H H H H H H 00 (Y % ❑ J < h r0 x x x x x x x x x E+ E. m m x x a Fz w � z 0 > O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o O In o O Ill O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O + 0 0 In In o H T O >. O H H o o , H 00 H o 0 H a ci U " W H H H H H H H H H H H os a. � O /1 a U h h x x x x x x x x x x x x a4 x x a 0015 y OD r 0) O m a O r 1-1 N N T 1n M M M co M C m m m m C cT 0) m m m V' O F Z N O N -� O I ip 'D x U V' O v c' O O O O v c O 00 O C O W F O O O O O .-1 1-4 O (� l0 l0 ID l0 w w ID ID l0 kD lD kD �D l0 ID F E- E. HPPP E-F E-F E-E E-F F E-E F a a Ln v 0 o m c o o, o r o w o iD o o In rl E. O N M m O m O O r z F O r O M r M 0) Ln N in o £ O lD 01 H N M M M M O O O r O N O m N N M r M N N a' O N M M M a N V' N O O O m c ID O ID O O O N M m O Ll 01 r O O O V' c r r co N r N m M W r-1 O r a H H M a 10 m 01 x x M x (N U O a ru fYl a z W a a s a a a z z z a m a < a >> a a fC a FC ai H H H H Q a U) < M U) Z E. P E. F E-H F a< F a F a F F E+ N O O O O O O E-F £ O a O W O c7 c7 O O W H E+ �4 E+ a E-E F F E. r. E-F > F Z z E+ a F z U E+ U O W W W W H H H O O H a a H a E. a a m a W a a D. a z a z U) a a a a EE a H O H O a 0 U O O W O a<<< O H O z w 0 W W O U O E4 > a ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ H ❑ F U U U ❑ rl ❑ < H ❑ W W ❑ 5 ❑ < z U z En z a z U) z a z m m w z F Z a z z Z z a z W "M W F W F W J4 w a W E❑❑❑ w z w x a W HHW F W a W > a > U) > U > a > a Z Z z > O > F a > U' CD > U) > U ❑ rC z O ❑ < < < Ft O o o z z z W U) U H a m LL a s a N U) W W H a W C. U W m H ❑ O a W r M c N r N > 1 > 01 l0 O in r c N z Z £ O m co m m W N m M O H ❑ H m m o m N N N N m m r l0 H z z -W m N rn m rn rn c c m m .� H x z a < CQ w ao a 1 O O C, F a r N O O m O O O o r O O O N O W 1n Ot O O N O O O o O O o 01 O rs) ID N C.O t0 O O CD O W l0 O O O U) O M 01 M M r-1 m M (n m M .--1 N in 0) r z 0 O O O NCOO Ln DO 00 O �r cD ID r r l0 W r ID m W r w ID ID ID E+ y r N i V v c c O r M M N r-4 O Ln O Ln N 1n N Ln 1n H in N N N O 1n O N N N N v v' a' c r N M r r N N U U H H ri o r1 FC O C) O C. ClO CD O O 0 O CD O r O O 0 O CD C) O C) O O 0 U a a a a M H O U O U O U O U Z o Ln m a v) W U U U U a rn ❑❑ o) U) a W FC RC F a F s N ❑ a W z a o O w a w a ❑ a s v❑) a) w pa H FC O z W a x U) u) z W z W z W z W z O W S W 3 z 00 z £ W >� a a a W m a w �4 - w W ❑❑❑❑ W W w co H O ❑❑ O U U W z F o as O ❑ a r.0 z r.0 U O 3: O z ❑ z ❑ z 5 z ❑ ❑ U U M ❑ v) ❑ N r.0 z H u) z a h a a a a a a ££ ££ R £ F G Z O W > In o O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O >+ N O N o r-1 O O .-1 0 o 1n O in O o O O 11 o O . O 1-1 O .A r1 O UP U H a r.0 U) W U O 3 O z O z O z O z O ❑ r� no U U u) ❑ v) ❑ W w z 1� w FC U a a a a a a a a £ x X £ E £ /62 0016 y lD r m m O N m 1' O H N M c' Ln �D r m Q 01 m m O O O O O M M M M m M m M m a 0 E z N O H H H kD x U O O O O O O O O O O W E H H H .--4 r H H H H H H H H H 0 Q w ID ID ID ID w ID tD w ID ID tD lD w w - w w tD £ Q W E-E E+ E+ F F E E F+ E E+ E E. E E E+ E+ E E 4 a a Ln v T O m M lD H N O O O O O O O O O H El N O m O u) cD O Ol r w m O O LO O O O O O Ln Wz m O o) Ln m u) H 1D rn u) x; 0 0 0 o r £ .7. r Ln r m .--I C In to H r D1 m Ln O m N N O H M C Ln m w M r M m r LO M r kD Q m a r Ln v o rn O o 0 0 r L� o 0 o O in o 0 m a O r Ln �n r 0 o r w u1 w z r rn m m Ln a a a a c > rn O M W n N Q Q Q Q 0 M H W m N U U U U z z z z z Cu r H H H H rerd�• H £ £ ££ £ z z u ❑ x x x x a ❑ p❑ p p H H E a U U U U Q Q Q Q Q m F m O N E E E a a to a E E E E E Q Q a C7 a a H a a 11 11 11 11 z Q E Q E W Z Q E m H m H m H m H m H E-E E-E Q El W a Q F Q E+ a Q E z m z Q E. E Z E z E z E+ z O O m O H O ❑❑❑❑❑ m m O O O ❑ O 0 O ££££ W H E F E m E. H H E W E-E D. E+ W E H" E U E a O D. D. D. P. m p❑ U H O m m ££££ H IL a Q a w a ££££ E a Z a x a F a a O H O a 0 O H H H H H D. u. 0 w 0 W O O E E+ O F H E E > a p ❑ ❑❑ ££❑ a❑ a❑ w 0 U V❑ u z C) z z z z a s .a a a H H z w z w z 0 z w w z w w w w H m w z W O W Q Q Q Q Q W C.. W [LW w z W r7 h w h h h h W > H > 4+ > U V U U U V U > z > £ > H > 0 0 > O O O O p w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W Iz m a a a a a m m a a a a a a a a £ w w w D. aL aL w w w H ❑ a z O . W uO H H H H > > m m V' C V' C' C' V' V' H y z£ o r r r r r r r 0 r m H H H H H p "m .-� m O O O O O O O M oD O O O O H Z r H .n 0n Ln In 0n cn m m m o 0 0 0 ❑ �) a' N N N N N N N N 04 N N N N N N N H a' a < m w m a 1 O O [� E a O O O O O O O O O m O O O M O C. O O W O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r o 0 0 Ln o 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o u) 0 0 0 In o 0 0 0 O lD r r r r r r r Ol M �f) D1 M In U) y 04 N �--� 0D 0D ClO a' v' O O O O O 0 O �D v N N N N N N N N N N N N N ID ID ID ID lD E z H O O O O O 0 0 0 H N O m m O u) O O O O O O O O O O C. O m Ln H O O O N O O O O O O O O M N O r ID V' r r r U U H H O In O In O in O O O O O O O U C7 a z a z H H U U U U U U U O H O OI E H 1--1 F-1 H H H H Q V U U U W O > > > > > > > m z H H H H M z U a a a a a a a O N 0 0 W W W W W W W G. V U U U U o m m m m m m m O H O O O O Ln F z a Q U a a a a a a a U u > m m m m Q w H Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 0 z a Q Q Q Q a a H H H H H H H m D W H H i U H U U U U U U U m 0 m x JG w w w w Q W U z z z z z z z Q U z U U w E a w Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O O O z z Z z a z a z z z z z z z a a U a s O O O O CQ H W W H H H H H H H Q Q m m m m Q o a w v4 w w w 1. w z z w Q Q a a a a r 0 w O 0 a z z w w w w D Q O O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z E E F z z 0 U U U a p H O o D 5'. ❑ D D Q Q Q U O H H H H M z £ £ £££££££ z z z a s Z z z z E C, w Z O > O In O O O O O o 0 1D ul O O O H H H H ❑ N m H H H H -4 1-1 O H in O O O O >+ O O O O O O O O O O O N O O H H H O F a 0 z z z z Z z z E E+ E+ 3 3 U U U U U H H O ❑ ❑ ❑ p O O ❑ Q Q Q Q Q H H H H Q U £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ z z z z z Z z z z 0!{q 0017 Z m O H N M cr to C N �D r m M O l0 r m M O .-1 (N M C' tf) lD r m ch in v' V' Q' C to to N n to In to Ln to N O E-F Z N O N H N � � x O W F H H H H r-1 H H O O O O O O o .-i H H 0 R. w w w w w w to lv �o w w w w �o w ID to ID w w �o ID �o t0 w w w < m F H H H H F F F F F F F F+ F H E+ H H F F E-F F F F F F F E 4 a a O O O O O 01 O O N C. N N m H H r m m 01 m r r M N ,..., F Lo 0 0 0 o ui o o to H r r ow tD Lnm m m o 0 o o c to u-) Ln r rn ID r w E z O r O O m O V' O w O N N H O m M C lD M H M m v' H H Ol O N N H M to al H N O m m M N N m r tT N N m r m c' lD N O1 01 y Q m H N H H \D N N H M H H c M Cu cn D1 (`1 N N tD Ln N FC .S FC Ft FG a rn O U U U U U u U r m z E xxxxxxx U U U U U U U D w w w w w w w a z E. E. ll I I- -- ll 11 .l .4 x a H E+ F F H H H 4 < << z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z H E+ E.E. `b O x£ x x x x x O O 0 W H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F F W FE z E E E E O H a x m m rn m cn m m m cn m m m m cn m cn cn m D: IxH O H H F F H F H F O W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W w O x O E-F > ai U U U U U U U O H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H O 0 5 z u w w w w w w w z a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a z m z a H co FJ h h h h h h w a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a w w O w O O O O O O O> a a a D. a a a a a a a, a s a. a D. a a. a. > H> Ui D: % W a z z D: O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 5 o W W cn a a a a. a. D. a m cn cn m m rn cn m cn cn m m m m cn cn cn n D: a W r>. U W I m u1 M m O1 H O H H N Ol Ol O c v' M r O r " C) Q'. H H .--I o m N N m M M ID w H 1n LO D1 H 0 W H H H H H H r-1 M lD O m v 1n O U7 Lr) M Ol Ol M m m N M l0 > I > m 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 m M m M 1n N N M M 1n c c 0 v r r m N Z z x N M r-1 H M a) m m r H .-1 N a' a' m r O r H O H O O O O O O O O m m r r r r r m m r O O O m m m m O m H z O O O O O O O to to n to N n to N n Ln w w w to Lo N N to to O N N N N N N O H JG a < m W m A I O O G E4 a O o O O O o o Cl o r r r r r O H O H .-1 O .-1 O O O t7 o O O w o o o o o o 0 o o In to to Ln un o H o H o H o 0 0 0 o o o m o 0 0 0 0 o o o O 1D w w w �o o m o m m O m O o o 0 o O o z 0 N M (D N to (M M H H M M M M M M M M H M H M M H HLr) z O O O O O O O O O ID to to to c) O O cD O O O O O O O O O O M M C) O tD tD to ID �D �D tD r r �D �D to W�D w r r r r r r r r r r r r ID r F N N C H N H H H H N r-1 N N r-1 N M w M 5 m to H O m N Lr) LO U'1 to N N N uN Ul) O Lo O O to O to O to in O O Ln M in H N M H N U U H 1-1 -4 N H N N rl N F� O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O o O O O O O O O O O o O O C L H to to H Ln H H r1 H ri H H U U U U U U U z z z z z z z H H H H H F1 H M O U O O O O O O O O U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U u'I rn m w w m to m Z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z a U1 w m m m w m . H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H a F F H H F F H F F H H F H F F F H H H z I w w w w w w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 rC a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a. a. a s a m W F z z Z z z z z W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 41 W W vl W H 4 z O O O O O O O H < a a a a a a a W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W fl W O W N a w w w w w w w u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u a < z x. x. x x Y. .14 .Y. H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H a o u u u u u u u a w w w a w w w w w a w w w r.. w w w w z w O H h-1 H H H H H a a C. r4 a rL r4 rL a E. rL a a rY a E. L. r4 C. O rn z z z z z z z z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a a E+ W W z 0 .> H H H H H H H to to in to N Ln to to N Ln Lo to to to to to Lo to n O O 0 O O O O O O O o o o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O H 0 O H H H H H H H O O O O o 0 o o O o o o 0 o o 0 0 o o O N n U Hu U U U U U U C. W W r. u r,.� W G. Gu rz1 a fl rl Gl ru [u Cu G.. !� f.. a E4 t' 0 U H H H H H H H H 1+ 1 G. r.. k. f . k. G. ru [u ru GU ru [s. Cu G. r+. GW W W w a u z z z z z z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a 0018 z H O .--1 N N M M d' c M )n ID r m /.� Ln ID l0 In \O N lD LD u) m N m m m m (x. O H Z N O N H M lD U o W H O ID H .-i lD O ko H l0 O 1D H %D H %Q o w tD w w ko %D lD E pq H E F E+ E F E. F F F E F F H E. a a LO c O O m w m c- c w .0 O N O o o r H 01 r LOo 0 v o N 1D m 01 m M in Z H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W z �I lD N M \D a? 10 m M 01 O N 1D E O N u') .-I v o) N w Ol N V' u7 M M M >1 0 tD LO LO r H c W N r' N O O m lD m r ID lD o Ol V7 w N m W 0) x m ON m En C` H N W w C x w Ln H H a a z F a F m D w W a w H E. m m w a w a n a w(D m a U a a a a a a 0 a- a s H z z a U rrr 0: r.� r•C aC r.� F '1 O x m r.0 E < r.4 a H H < > z E+ O E+ F F U E+ Cu H a £ F O F E HP. F El m 0 0 �+ 0 0 0 > 0 H 0 W W a 0 U 0 w 0 a W W 0 W H E+ Z F Cl F W E m F a H > E O F H E+ F O W W E. x U H H O H z< [+. < m m E£ U 04 a E+ Ix U z W U 0G F w >+ m v) a w O H O PG O U O O U O H O \ H H O z O m 0 0 a .a w 0 x > D: O 0 no a O a Z O m w z O "o 0 z H H H O U H W z W EIW w W E+ W U W WPMW Ol w Z W H z z a W z W > D> m> > z> w> W 0: z> > D> W D D a> O 0 z O a a w o < 0 w 0 0 D m m H z U W a U U a m E U U m a W w U W M rn c H w M c v' 01 N O w t0 H O O1 m m N > I > CQ w O H H M N z z .E O N �O v' N H M M H M r H q H D r O O r-4 H Ln N N N N N Ib H z (+) M O M N m c O O O O V' q M r El N O M H .--i H H H N H x FCC z a r.0 at w 1 0 O E. F r O V' Ol O O o O o o o (D O r w W Na) a) O M c H O O O O O O O O )A fA �D u7 O LO ID m O O o O O O O O u) F D M r Ol M co r .-1 r r r M Z l0 o c' C) O H O O o N M M M O o lD l0 �D N wr r ID ID �D lD 1D lD lD r �D E. z H N H H H N N H H H r N D u) O u") O C) O LO u) O a) O U) O O u7 N O N N M V'Ln ) H N m M w lD (\ U U .-) F� o O O O O 0 0 o O O o 0 o o o -4 V7 -w H 1- 14 1-1 1-1 .--� o 0 U H FCC<< H 0 0 0 0 U) LO Q w z F a a a a >>>> w Z I z a o a co 0 z 0 z (D z W m x w U w U w u w U U W F a z O H F El< 3 w W W O E+ z El< z E+ z a x a 0 a 0 z 0 a 0 D; W m H < D >+ OI O r> H a m x a x H m u H a a H a a H a a m m H m O m x m x m x m x I fC x a Q 0 a O a C. a w 0 w 0 w 3 0 w 3 0 W x w x W x x D D H O rt a a rC a a r a a r1 a a r� r� m F a z a a a E E E+ a a W z 0 > O o >+ o O H o O H O O .-1 o O M O O C o N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 O H Cl u) O 0 u) 0 0 N 0 0 Ln 0 0 Ln O 0 N O U H U H <U a [s. a H H a 0 o a 0 0 a 0 H (i H H D: (i. D O 3 a a a: a a a 0019 z Ol O H U) N m v to r m to O lD H OD m m ,n ON 0) ON Ln ,O n m l0 01 ID O E+ Z N O \ H c \ x �D O W U E H r l r-1 v ,-I rl H v O v O v O rl .-1 v O 1.1 N v O (' < w 1D to w 1D lD lD w 1D ko ko ID £ RC W H E+ E+ F F E. E. F, F E. E F F E a, a L a O O O Cl O 01 O O O LO N O O ,n H F O O O z w H z ,n ,n v O Ol O O H m to N O OD w £ O to ,--I r-I O 'W OD O N r N OD O r O N O O N O r H O OD t.o N H H H v w lD a, N H D O O m O O O In N O O m Ol O O £ m u O N O m m v ❑ CO O N a r N I N m r r r a H O w m H w N ,--I M -I4 v a, kD O to U x N E 0 C9 C7 E z z z w m a £ H W W z El H U U U a a w a E a H a x a z a a a a > > > rJ w< Un a o a w< m< a z MMMP E a E OH a F X E £ E ME, E. E a. O O O u O CL O O O a 0 E O x 0 O O W H x x J4 E a a H E-E H U E+ a, F, U E. H I-+ a E+ a E C/) U H U U U 0 0 x W W £ O O O H a, W W W a F E a Un a ❑ m a s U a )7 a U a E+ a E a O H x x x 0 U U O H O H O \ O O ❑ O m O U O U O ❑ > a U U U❑ x x❑ z❑ a❑ En ❑ Un ❑ a❑ a s D❑ 5❑ It z U z a a z W z z w z H z z a4 z a z a z \ H U) Z z z W F F W a w >+ W H W W W W W W F W E. w x W FC FC < > U) U)> a, > E > a, > O > El> ?' > U)> U)> F ❑ a a a z z W H O a, rC rt z z co Un a, a, a, H H a U U UJ a F H H v U W m O " ❑ a r N O 1 > � O N a z z£ H❑ H O r r O ON 1 a H ❑ z v N v N v N w m N O 04 RC H x r> z a, rc W W as a 1 O O w H a r r r N N O O O l0 Ol O N N O W ,O Ul In D• 01 O O O aD C m01 O a1 LO � ,I) U') In O O CD N Ln �fl O N Lr) O O 01 01 O\ Ol m N N mm l0 O\ 01 m z 0 O O O O O v O O O N O O O w �o w l0 l0 r lD r co w lD � E+ z N N N m N N m m ,-, r1 v m N �o O Lr) N Ln N O O ,n ,n In O O LO O O O v v v N N N N m 01 N N U U ri .-1 H H H H H H H H N ri H 1D Fl; O O O O O O O O O O O O O a' rl r-1 H r-1 r-1 r-1 H H H H (Y) H H N W Un E- L) [ H C„ W C. xa' 04 44 Romr�, a a z 5 z 5 a o a �1 04 LD ..1 U UWJ Ew-F C7 O O O 1 U) x O Un Un Un H H H >+ E T+ a x ,n a .4 a ££ E E a E W z W a, W W w x x z z z a. O U < z Z Z U �a p O O x O E-F > 1 0 0 0 z U U U a w H H H x U N w a w E+ m m a w w C. < W H W F CA Un a z W w w E F ❑ z ❑ z Op O CA H E E+ E+ w H O H O m a 3 rt D I I 1 O O z > Un O Un O O O r a a s a a a U a U a H z < a <Fc� a s H w w W H w a < O Un Un Un < r� a Un > > > > c7 O Un a z �a �a u L z a a a a a m F G, W a� x m a° z O > O O O Ln ,O O Ln v H O o LO O O O N N N m m O O m m O N r O H O Y O O O O O 1-1 O O O H H N O U E U/J Un Un Un U a to > > > > al CO to a a a x a a a a a 03n 0020 Z N M c .n 1D r m m o r-1 N M In to r m m to to r m m o H N M V' to to r m �D �o 'o \o lD l0 to to r r r r r r r r r r to to to \o \o r r r r r r r r r a 9 O F z N O N .--1 to \ x ri O W H o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U ko \D to to to to �o to 1D W to to to w w to to to to to ID �o to w to to w �o ID `y w F E+ F F H F &. F E. F H H H H FH F F F E4 E. E+ E+ H E+ F H F E+ E F E-+ E-F a a v m r 1D M N O1 r 0 00 O O r r O O O O 0 �o c V' o v' wm O m O N H m -4 . c r+ � M - .i m o 0 o M M cr .� o o .� v o m .-, m m .-+ vi r o c o N rn m Z H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . w Z m .--I v' v' m V' aD M 0 .f1 N �D 1D r �D o 0 0 r O o1 O o1 O M N tD 01 0 N 0 x D a r c o c r V. r 0 r r ao o .n Ln o H c H H H H H o M c 01 M m o1 >1 0 ID v O N .a .--i m V' V' H .--i H M N .n H H r v r c r �o Ir M m N .-1 m M H e-1 M M H H N r M H Z Z W H H io z H H x > > 01 H x x W C7 0 H H m z s<< o O a a �££�CC r££rCC H H H H S D o w O m m 0 0 > > a a� H H O H m m 3 S a H H z z 0 0 0 0 0 >+ .-a m m m m F m m O O O O f1 m m H H a a 0 0 0 H rC D D D D m m as z z a a a a >+ i+ m m n a a a a a H a, 0 0 0 0 D D O O Gu Gu [l Gl CL a a D D E x GL GL D. FC U x x x x a Z z m m H m x< Q O O H H H a a a a a h W O O F a x x x x H z z x x 0 0 0 O a W W W W W x 0000❑ z m W H H E rt w m m m m FC < x x z Z Z H rt z z z z z FC m 0 0 0 0 z a UP z z w C. << 4 4 m << m m H H H H a W W a 1.+ U U U U O D U E+ E+ 4< m m m a w 4< Z Q< W m [� O ri E x U w a H H Z z 3 m D D D 0 z E H H H H a !L 3 3 S S a b+ > m m m W h E E+ F E+ CL E H H\\ O O O❑ W W W W W W H H O O O o W W z U m m a\ W w w w o O D D m m x x x z 0 a a a a a C.. U a a a a 134 h H m W w x 0 0 0 0 z z a a w w w \\\\\\\\\\\\\\ w m m 3 H❑❑❑❑ F 0 0 a a 3 m 3> a s ..a a a a .a .a .a a a a a a ❑ m m W m O D D D O D U<< H H w w W 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Z c M M M M U W W a a E E Z Z Z a a a a a a a a 14 a s .4 a s w G.. U W o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o O o O O O o 0 0 0 H ❑ a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O • W m r r r r r rl o kD kD m M H N > > m a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a n w w�o w w r r �o w w io ko w z z x H H H H H H H H H H H I-i H H H H H H M M M M M M M m M M M M M M H❑ H D a a a m m a a a a a x a a a a a a a .n .n Ln in Ln .n Ln .n Lo .n o In in in H Z 4L CL a a a a4 a a a a a a a, a a a a a w w w lD to w w w W ID to lD 10 W ❑ RC FC a s KC M M M M M M M M m M M M M M FC z a g m w w a i o O 1, E+ a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 o o 0 o O o 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 o o o o o o o o o 0 o o o 0 o 0 o 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 o O M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M Z O O O O O O o O O o O O O O O O O O O O cD O a O o O c) O O o O c) cD O c- O cD O O c3 c) O a O a o O O �D tD lD �D �D lD 10 1D lD lD 10 to to lD to lD �D lD 1D lD to �D lD tD lD 1D lD �D �D 1D to Q1 F Z M w N lD N M cn cD N N .n M cD M tD M N M to M m D O O O O O O O O O o O O O o O o O O O O (D O O cD o o O O cD O O O O O cD O o O m O 0) 01 41 O1 O1 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 Q1 Q1 D1 01 dl r-1 .-i 61 01 O1 Q1 r-I D1 O1 D1 D1 01 .--I W U LOkoLnwLoLowwLn,nkDLnwkDwu)%DLr) Ln �o Lnw -iLnLnt�oL,w -, a c c o c o sr o v o 0 o c v o c c c c o 0 0 o c c o o c v v c o 0 4L 4L 4L W W D. W D. 4L W W CL CL LL W CL o. D. D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a M C.7 C7 C.') C7 C7 U' C7 C7 V' C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 U' C'J 0 o x x x x x x x x x AG JG x x x �L x x x cL U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U a a a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w � a a a a a w a w a a n, a a a a a a w a m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m z 0 < D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >+ a z z z z z z z z z z Z z z z z z z z a w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w rC O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E w a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a w z O > o 0 0 0 O o o O 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O >1 0 0 0 o o o O o O O O O O O O O O o U E+ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m U H o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a U a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a w w w w w w w w w w w w w w x x x x x x x x x x x x x x U U U U U U U U U U U U U U D D D D D D D D D D D D D D F H H H H F F H E H F H H H w .a .a .a w w .a . � w w w w 0 z z z z z z z z z z z z a a a a a a a a a a a a H F H F H H H H H H F H F H D D D D D D D D D D D D D D a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln n o n Lrn u1 Ln Ln .n .n Ln .n Ln .n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H F F H H E+ H E+ H F H H E+ 033 D D D D D D D D O D D D D D a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0021 z Ol O H N r m 0) N O H N M V• In l0 r m m O H r m m m rn ON 0) m o O O o o 0 0 0 0 0 E m p H .+ .-+ .•+ .� H H �+ F Z N O N H tD iD U H H H � H H � c � � � � � H � � .� � � c o W U FC ID l0 kD kD 10 lO ID l0 w �D �O w w Cl ID E Q x F E E E E E F E+ F F E-E E E-E F H F F+ H E E 4 D, a c N v O rD O O O C. O M LO m l0 O O N O to O .-� E+ �D N �D r ul O O O O H H to O Ln N v N N N r O Z E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . w z M l0 r n r O O m O m 1D v m N v H N m. 01 ❑ m W t0 m r O N M m M r Ln H r M M 01 kD r N O H H m r l0 (+) H M H H m N N H H < O H H I N N CL H M O O O l0 0 N C �fl O O m O at V E E r o ❑ m cn r.0 ao m �D FC m < FC r N a. 0) W U �D H c G*. a' m > > M H a' Ln H H H H ID iz F M z a x a❑ M El D z r W W 04 W v) z cn H Cn M CY, O. ❑ H a Ol a a 1: m "4 � W W cn G4 U E4 r.0 U � U) D: W a a a .a a a 0) a z CL a a F a F a W O w < < a a Qi z -ct H < Q z H z 2. D z O Cu z > E a E u^ F O U -�-� U E-F O F O O H E O E. W a O H O li E+ 0 U >� H r.0 w>� U H U E. O in W H W to W E+ a1 aL H a E. EE F. W z E W F+ cn w U) > E+ CL UP W a x x O < E r D fZ to H H D. W a ❑ E IX W D: E+ a V m t!7 £ a. 44 O: O H ❑ CA $ z 0 O U O H a 0 W a O O w O cn > a O<> w❑ a a O❑ z 40 H H F❑ a❑ F r.0 W H r1 >+ ❑ a z V U U U U z W W z a z D z z a U 0Y z W z D W H D 04 M z w H to W >> W E-F W E H W W z w w cn w z D. W m W a a a a> r.0 rL > fn > E i. > a O m> w> i'i IIi H X M m> ❑ (� (D (D D D z O W D O W H O W Z O W H W a a a a H E+ H U cn Dm U❑ ❑ U 3 a U x w w U W H❑ o 0 o m O W M O to N N m a r N N N r > I > w ID kD �O r ID N O H O O .-4 .-4 H H r-4 z z x M M M M m m N a N N to 0 N N I H ❑ H O Ln Ln Ln Ln r Ln M I I I I I 1 O H z l0 tD tD lD N r N l0 N N N N N N H ❑ M M M M M m 01 cnFe O O O O O O M H JG z. a W W w a 1 O O Gv E-F z O O M O O O N O O O O O ID H 1D H H lD m O W O O N O O O 0h O O 0 0 0 c O O H O O O O In O O cn O O O n O O O O O w tD lO m lD lD w O x D H H H H r M 01 r W M r M 01 m m rr) dl 01 O1 lO z O O O l0 M M O m M O M O H O O O O O O M lD �D lD N lD H r �D w r w ID ID H E z O H O N cn O r H H H N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O cn O Ln O Ln O O O O O O O O O H H H O c O N M O M H N Ln 0 Ln 0 in 0 0 O U U H H H H H H H H H H H H H N N N N N N H FC O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O H H H H H H H H H H H H In In to In In In to H E+ z U U U U U U W z z z z z z x H H H H H H z a U cn cn cn > o x a z x x x x x x O H C7 a❑ z z O O O O O O 0L o: a s O H H D4 3 3 3 3 3 3 U r.0 W w W W E-F x x a a a O H E+ E+ F E+ H O x d4 x x El W W <<< O W W W W W W to I U U U U RC FC to to z z z x z z z z z z U) W E E E E E r.0 U x x G. [u G. E F E+ E+ E+ E+ a z cn m cn E+ E+ O c� cn cn cn to to G FC < a w e U W W W W W W H < D ro W w a o. O 3 3 3 3 3 3 a >+ 01 < z Z ,7. z cn a s E F E cn x x x x x x < a s D O rC D RC n RC n D z H z H H 0 a s W a a x H F E OOO E E F U O O O O m F G. z W a. z a w cn cn a !nu) to (n !n E+ MWOMMM y z O > O o 0 0 00 O cc O 0 0 O r r r r r r O D In In to In H H O In 1n H H H H O O O O O O M ORC O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O A n oD� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oH 034 U a a a a m cn m m co m cn m rn m m m m o m 0022 z C. Ln ID r M M v In f� 0 W ti ri rl .-1 r-I .-1 .ti r-I '-I ri H •-1 rl W M ri m m E z N O N x 0 O W E O .-� .--� H .--1 e-1 e-1 r-1 c) O r-I O 0 O < ID w ko tD w �o �o � a 2 s co El E E. F E E F F E F F E. LO c o c N r M Cl 0 0 Ln o 0 0 F o O O o 0 0 o rn rn O O z E+ W z o o tD O rn £ D to M r N ID Ln O .-i M O 1D >+ 0 m N N r-1 M v N RI; N N f` r N H N a � � O O c N r M O O O Ln O O O O O O 17 O O O to c Orn a O Orn r o D: 0 0 0 w o M H e z r U �o w Ln w M r m N a 'D Ln O H > M z a H w w m .-i H m W N N H (") N z o: u1 a N a r ❑ r N U Ix a U E-F F z ON 00 0 0 z F > to W w 0 z z H z to E+ H o a [� a ❑ a 0 a a co am a z a z a a x a O H F H � F F H OH F z E O EE-F r.� E--F a D. E<-F O F a H E-H [.+ W O H O E+ a W O E [� 0 L" F O F 0 H a 0 H E+ > O F F < O E+ w w 0 E+ to O E. rl 0 F z 0 RC (Z O E. U a a F z E+ 3 D W O E. H W a -- x W a w w to tz U cz w a a rx to x tz tz u. a O H 0 z 0 W O D. O w 0 w O 0 0 0 0 H 0 - < O U z > a ❑ O ❑ O ❑ O ❑ H ❑ E ❑ ❑ ❑ a ❑ E ❑ > ❑ U ❑ D D z U z H z a z a z a z H z z z m z W z I z to z C. a H to w F w w w w w W W x w O w Z W w W H w ❑ w [u w > H > > > > > a > U > c.. > > a > F > z > x ❑ D W W D a W 9 F z < o W H ❑ ❑ to < D: El to < a [.. U w o H ❑ a Ln 0 W M ko d. > I > W N c O o m r - H ❑ H D O r- w C 1D 1D H z c z w < w w m a I 0 O c.. F ai C. O Cl O O O r N O r W O O O O O O 1D N o in O O o O O O w 1D m O O W rn .n rl M Ol M Ol CT M z M lD ko O o l0 �o O O O O lD ID N N N lD 1D r to lD lD E+ z N O O N N O .-1 M to o) N r-1 D Ln o o Ln o O Ln Ln Ln to LO an O M O O r O N a' M to C N U .-i H < O O O O o O O O O o C. 0 W ❑ z r w 0 z < w a H H H rod H o O D z < to to (f) 0 04 0 Ln fn D. E D U F w F 0 O a 0 0 a H H a u < x n a U W z Ha' I a w O O x w F o w a w of m < a a < ❑ w z a P° °Q to w w w N a S m x a m w H H H z z z ❑ a $ o o z F 3 > x x � � 0 0 F G. z G.7 to F to to £ E+ t o cn a] E -F F E z O > M C. O O (•') Ol LO O o O O O O O M o r-I In O to r m In H .--1 .-•1 O U F H o O IL < rt F O 4 F O w E O z D O z O z O O ❑ O a o OWE . to A4 E-F O E+ O E O�'� 0023 z m m m O .--4 N (`') c -cr u) %D u) ID w H N r-4 N N N N N m m M N W N 0 H H H r-I 14 H H H e-1 H H H H E z N O N H W \ H x lD U o W F o £ RC m E E. E E+ E E E+ E E E E E+ E E n a LO c o m o o o o o o) (1) W o o o r H E m m o o 0 0 O (3) 1-1 O) o O O N z E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . w z o 0 0 o O � r m r O u� E D r N o u) u) O (- O to t+) m m H 7+ o v N H o m (n O H N H £ H In w C o m o o rn (1) m O o o (n r) o o m H rn o O o rn o o Lo E+ r m N r O D N cl) N O r (n O )o In m Ol (n ry c m m H O W N (`') m Q v E N E. w c� z w z w w O E a a w r x u a m a U U U U a a W a a W a a a z .a < £ < > > > > 4 4 z < < � < a D Q z E r E m m m o p E OE- E (z E- H MP O E (D O O 0 O O 0 x 0 O w 0 O w 0 z 0 z W H E E+ Z Z Z z F U E+ W F+ E-E H E- E U F Z E+ H a O O O O rUi u) m E- x au) a m o: (n c>~ O a a > a a W O H W O < O E E+ E E O O a) O x O U O W O a O Q O W H Z z £ z U .1 z Z W W W W W .4 z " Z a z a z u) z O z H (l) 0L W a w w as as w W > w w w a w O W E W W x W w C4 > m> w m m m> a> a> W> a> (n > E+ > I > u Q D FC Z z z Z D H on O O W z E. (n (n (ci H H H H W 3: O V <L > O E W G U W H Q a 10 N O o H p W (n r ko Zz o E N (1) (n Ln H Q H D r' O C V' V' V' m O (3) H o H z O l0 to w�o N O to O) N Q 1-4 N O) O) O) o) (`l m W w O H x a z a � m w m a i O O f+ E a r o 0 0w o o r) o o v o 0 W c N O O O In o w (n o o v O O m W co O O o o O �o If) O O to O O D m (n rn m rn m m Ln m M In In r z O O O O O O O m O O Cw Cl O M r w w w w ko �o r w w r E. z (n H N w m N r m 10 N N m e-( N D uo (n H In m In m In o) O O In O (n 0 a N r W W v w H 0 H N 7 N c U U a o 0 0 0 0 o o o O o o O o 0 r1 H c v V' H c H H z z z z z a H H H H O U U > U z Z H F F F F > O H H o (n z r.0 < a FC D U H >+ O W O E F F E (n U O a r•C (n Q H a a a a z (n U 3 (L Q H D D O O Q H u) H U z z z z 0000 0 o , E z w �pay� w m Q o .4z m w w w w E+ H a O E- RC X \ m H w x x a4 x E D 0 (n w U FC D z rC -tC > > z 0 > O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO (n o D .-1 o r-4 H e-1 e-i O O O O H O N .--( 0 >+ o H O O o O H H H H O O O o U E- W F FI H H H H H m �'.. a a Hz U H RC U 0 E- O El Z El x x E x E x E+ H E+ a O m D m D > 0 > 0 f1�Jj1 > J 0024 Z� r w m o r w m + r rn o N M C o N LO 1 w w w m M M M m N N M m m 01 V V o% V• rz O F z N C. N H x U c v c a , a a• c r v c) O W F o O O O N (D O . ro O O O O U < l0 %O l0 �o �O w l0 w to to �O o ID l0 �O to l0 l0 to \O l0 w �0 %D l0 a s m F E F F F F H F F E+ F E F F F E F E In v O o N O O O r Lo r I` O .� E r w 0 ID N O H In r W .-I 1` %D O Z F . . . . . W Z M O. N In M. N N. O I` C : 01 N �O E D If) H m r C a0 N M W O M N In N 01 %D N 0 ON N N c W N W0. 01 -4 N .--� r. O O O N O O 01 r- N If) In O c O O N �O In N U) o ID r u) Ch N .-I co OD N M aD O @r ON .-� N �o w 0) N N 'tt' ko A O7 H V' V) Z D OE. £ H W H a w a a a a a co a a U) a FC a a s (N rs a Q w a < W FC z F. Z E O F In F E+ F U E E E F a F O O O O a O O O O U O z z O a O W H El HP F U) F W E F a E r•C F H H a E rl E O W W O O a 0 O O a a O Ia-+ a ❑ W H Gam] H H H❑ PG O W O O > z u z a a a a m a z F❑ z❑ z u z U) ❑ Z D❑ a z❑ z a z a w a w W a a ❑ z m w z a H U) w U IL a a E a a w a W H W W W El w W H H w W H W W W > O a a a a 0 a> H> to > a> cn > F> a s z> a> z ❑ % D D D H O D a w H z z o o 0 0 0 W a M to M 6. F U) F ❑ F H H U U G-I E U F U W ID co aD m In m O H ❑ a N M w aD aD M f•') H O w M M c .--I ko O o o In to 1w C C O l0 N > I > m w r-1 CD -1 [- w ID c 1--1 O M m m c t- '-I N z z E w w kD w kD w w In 1 O M O m N M M .--I H ❑ H D r r r r rr r I- M r-1 o (3) co oD I- O O M H Z O O O O O O O r1 co .--I M aD aD I� N OD C ❑ O O O O O O O M O o) cn O O .--1 -4 -4 N .Y. FC Z a FC m w m a I o 0 44 E a O O O O o o In O O Ol N O c 7 M N N O W O O O o O O 1-4 O O c m O O O O O O O O O O O O O aD O O to N O W ID aD co m O ❑ .-1 M M M M In M M I!) m 01 (n 0) o% M M m (� Z o O O O O O o O O .-I O O O O O O O v r r r r r r r r �o w ID w W W r l` r, to E Z H N \o Io M M l0 '-I N N M M M N O O Lo O Lo N In N r-I O O O If] I!1 Ln N Lo In I!') N O .-I (N N N N N c M M N N Ifl N Ifl U .-1 H H H H . -1 I-1 171 .-1 r-1 ri N O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 o o O O O H rl H H H H r-1 .--I tF In H In z 0 H E E F a o ❑ O F F F F F F E a W O H H H H H H H U) F O O O O O In a z D z D Z D Z D z D z D z D Z FC H Cu h.I H EF F-I H H FI F zxxE H o w a 9999 zx I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M a ❑ O O O O O H FC U U U U U U U F U) H O a a a a a w E.u) a El a a a a a a z E+ E E E+ E+ F F < 3 E O O O 0 0 m� FaFd� a a a F ad a s O z O w O U U U U U F FC a E H ❑ x x x x x to a s O a a a a a a a E a a U) z m m a a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a O >+ a ❑ FC FC Fs FJ FC FC FC W H H w O w w w w a w m w U) E [. Z w 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ❑ 3 x x x x x x Z O > O O O O O O O 01 O O O o O O O O N O .--1 r-1 '-1 r-1 r-1 O .4 .-1 O o 1-I r-i .-i H r1 In o >- O O O O O O O O O O .--1 H O O O O O O UP O a a a a a a a FC FC a s rl FC r.0 W H H 3 U 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 $ 3 X X X >C >C 0 T-7 V 0025 z H N rn r1 O + rr E Z N O N O \ N x l0 U + H o w E -4 C7 FC E- El a a � F E Ln Li o 0 r E+ O O v z E W z E D In ID r > O N r a o ko o ON LA O O N N 01 F O E+ F z W E > > a 0 0 0 w H E x a4 E U E+ U U O H O x T O > a o U v o z U z z H to W W > > I O m a a o U W FC H o a a • w o > l OD OD OD z E m H O H O I I I H Z N N O � o o F H x z a rC m w m a I o O w F rz r r W a c D u) Lf) Z O O ID ID F z c D Ln Ln O h n U Q O O r-I r-1 W W U U H H > > a a w w cn m r> O C7 C7 o z z Ln H H a a a � w w w w I z z a H H W E a Z z z Z W H W W >4 a N a z z a a z z a s o 0 0 U) z r N El Gu W z O > o 0 D O O O r , U E D D U H O O FC U iL N 033 i ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 4:36PM 06/06/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 49753 06/06/02 ATT075 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 181.10 49754 06/06/02 BAL100 BALLONS & FLOWERS 58.88 49755 06/06/02 COA080 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 99.50 49756 06/06/02 ELRO10 EL RANCHITO 290.45 49757 06/06/02 IMPO10 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 1359.87 49758 06/06/02 LAQ040 LA QUINTA CHAMBER COMMERC 90.00 49759 06/06/02 LAQ050 LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES 702.91 49760 06/06/02 LEA020 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES 1175.00 49761 06/06/02 RCT100 RCTC 300.00 49762 06/06/02 RIV040 RIVERSIDE CNTY DEPT CHILD 426.50 49763 06/06/02 SOU002 SOUL OF CHINA 240.50 49764 06/06/02 SOU010 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO 542.78 49765 06/06/02 SPRO10 SPRINT 883.47 49766 06/06/02 STA044 DARREN STANLEY 62.50 49767 06/06/02 STA065 STATE HUMANE ASSN 50.00 49768 06/06/02 SUN070 SUNLAND SCREEN & AWNING 350.00 49769 06/06/02 UNIO02 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 54353.60 49770 06/06/02 UNIO05 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 191.00 49771 06/06/02 VER200 VERIZON 3310.65 49772 06/06/02 WEI050 MARK WEISS 77.00 49773 06/06/02 WISO10 WANDA P WISE-LATTA 179.52 CHECK TOTAL 64,925.23 031, 0027 z .-i N m c N �D N O F z N O O \ x o U O U C7 0 00 0 u u u o 0 of 0 (D o� OW E+ ZEE £ £ £ E ZZEM £ o) £ £ C) 0 a W W W w w W W W W W w W of W W oN a w m E+ &+ El E F El F F F F. F. H E. ElE+ E+ 1-4 m Ol N m O O u-) m V' r r O H O O O a' F+ r \D �o m Lf o c c (N a• H O M O O Ln z F W z .-i Lf) M m lD m o 1D m to m o N Ln o ID £ O m U1 m Ln m o) m r m O% (3) O r O N �+ O N O r V' a o m o Ln r o 0 o -1 m Ln v m o rn o 0 .� m o1 o of W O O N Ln m O ❑ m Lo D\ of ul z ON ❑ O E r W o .--� W N m z r > z o 4c o w a z [. E-F 1 w > > > ❑ PG U W of m m m 4C U W £ H z C7 3 x W z w w w o 0.4 a z a a < a oa a W a a s a z z z < H< a H a a \� • a \ a u 4C a z O O O H F E+ E. E E+ V U V U E-F z E+ a F+ z H H C7 o x x= O 4C O O W O > > > > O O O i O O O z O i W H 01 W QL E+ U E+ E W E+ m m m m F+ H E E+ H E. 4C E- L) F H U U £ E N F m 4 H GL m m m z ❑ m >> z 0; U U U U z < D: 4-) Z r� a \ a J-) 0" m m m o W O m m o .40 H H H H O .10 m o f o al o m > z a U w a w a w a o z ❑❑ z a D: o z H❑ U m z F a F cr E z F o z a < o z -4 o o z E+ m o z E. w o z .� ❑ H m W W W W `.4 w W W W z w U U U U W E. W W H w x w W c7L a a> a> E E-E > O> w w W w> m> a> U> U> a O HHH 4 a< o a a a a z \ W H \ 33 3 W 3 3 U W W W W H 04 !4 El a W H ❑ (y C• �o in cc m m m m O W m r r m m ❑ 0 0 oo > i > CQ 'n c• Ln �o ID 0 0 o c z z E m Ln m o c H H H m H❑ H p �o m ID r r D; % x m H z r N r O O rt < Q. m ❑ H dG N fn N kD ID > > > H 4c z m w m a 1 o o w E+ (x O O O O O o 0 o a) N O O c o O O W �D lO lD O Cl O O O H M c O O c O O £ lD 1D lD O O O O O ID %D c O O O O O 'J to to Ln m r r r r r r M lD H H z m m M O m m m N N N N m N m lD N E �o lD to r w to 1D to to w ID w N .-/ lD N ,?. m m m M N N H m V' c' N O o m O O Ln N Ln to O o O N c:)0 O O O O N N N O O N O y' O o O O o O o O O o o o O O O O V ❑ m m m m W W H m m m a s H H H H £ w m 5 U U U E E ❑❑❑❑ U 0£ p iWi 3 3 U M >>> 0 0 0 0 a H a O F E+ F E W W ❑ Ln m m m W W W < < < < fT7 a £ � H E+ (� m m m O a a H H H H FC m m m a 4� 4C a o x x x H z i W w W w >> o o x a a U u u u W E W W W w < < H H H H H a z A o; a a .4S a a a a F EE-F O CO H H H H m a s U < <. < 4 z z H 4C P 3 3 3 z W W z H H H H H H w m r a o x m x Dz Oz z o 0 0 4C (x F E H a u U W W W w a a U W a 4C O w w w a 4C 4C D a a a a ❑ E E E 4t 00 a E£ E£ U F w W rS aC 4C G1 U U w H H H H a a a a a z o > ur) un Ln o cc) 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 o o .7 r r r O oD m Lfl N o C O >+ 0 c o H o o 0 o c c o c c O H O U E E+ E E a 4C 4C a n. a a D. OI Ot < E+ > U H F E E+ 4C O o a ££££ 4C 4C W U H 4C U < Qi Qi W U U W H H H H a a a a m 0 0028 Z Ln %D r M OD m o N M v to W RW[ 1-1 •--� •--� � •--� N N N N N N N O E Z N O O \ N x to U 0 (D (D rn C) U U rn U 0 C7 U 0 0 o W E £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ 0 < W W W rn W W W rn W w W W W W a PO F E F E F F E F E H E-+ EH E E. �£ N •• O m r O O O O O N o o) V' O O v E. Ln r c Ln o o w o o LO o o o o Z E . . . . . . . . . . . . . W Z O N M N O. O M H N N O N N ON M M N a M + >£ O N OD M M 'y N FC er M a a w Ln O O OD r O O o O O Ln Ln Ln r c Ln o o to o to O N M fy' N O O < M H O N •a v m El to Ln LO n rn V• N Ln m cn o. v >+ £ M I o Z S O W x O 0 N cl £ Z E W £ £ a o a a a a s a a W a H a O Q z a FC rt RC RC < a < E. < Z < 0 0 H RC (DO Z F a F H E (D H E4 F. W E D E. £ £ E-E E. z z O O H 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 04 0 I 0 x 0 H H W H E U F F E E CL E E E E+ z z (D F H E 4 U E+ Z U >a H a s4 O O H U w W H W W D a. w > a. J-j 1% x !Y. ai Q. a. JJ C4 H H a > I% w w OH O 00 U O cn o N O cn O rn O U o N O F F m o ££ > PG 0 U O > 0 0 -H 0 0x 0 (Y. 0 0 -H 0 << W 0 z U z z W z w z 0 z W z W z z O z 0 0 E w z x x H u)W >+ W w z W W m w Z W 9 W W H H O Z W U U W > H > to > 0 > w > £ > z > % > a > a w £ 0 > z z 0 H < x \ W < w \ x z w x D D (n w w U (D a4 PL 2: (Q H D. H H a. a a a U W Ln m H 0 a to Ln w r O r O W Ln --I N �o O N I z z £ On r 01 N M M H O H D �D M H Z N V• r to r w 0 o OD r Ln r o H x < z R• ry m w Da a I o o w E a O O O O O O O O N N c O N N W O O O O o O O O M M w O N N £ O O O o O O Un O to to �D O m m D r rn In H o) m r Ln r Ln Ln Ln z M N M N O O N M M N M O o E+ 1D tD to N w w N N w w w w to to z H r M O M V' O O Q' V• V' M M M D O Ln N O Ln O O O Ln ul Ln Ln O O O H M .--I O M r O O V• v' a' H H H U H H r-i H H •-1 H -4 Q• O O O O O O O O o 0 o O O O H r-4 r-4 '-1 H V' V• H -4 H H H H H < E 0 H o z 0 rz-r D4 En U z O W M N < w 0 o (D cn a < x `n u) U F a c., > < r1 H W W k G4 H O O I Z 0a U U F r2y W H £ (%] Z < u) v) a z z cn x < 3 H H W 0 < D O H Z z 0 O O O O 3 3 » OI x z z W N N N N O E H H H H W r� O o z r] 0 O O F D z z w w w W Fz G. �,j m m W 0 to U) D D > > > > z O > N O o v to O N Ln o 0 0 0 O O D 0 H H d• to r o o O O o o in u) O >+ O o O O O O O O N N N N O O r U E D D % R(; a' Z H H w a. z lx H H O U H O O W F F D z z W W W W w W L Ft U cn cn co cn cn cn D D > > > > 3 3 0029 z r m rn 9 N N N O E Z N O O \ M m i0 U O W E+ £ FC m a a N c E Z E+ W z £ O >+ O 0 a 0 O r r 0 W H U H 1-i 0L O H a z U N U) w a . w m z £ H � z a w m £ 0 z E+ z O O U U C7 C7 C7 £ £ £ W W W H E E N (n r M M N 0) N V N U) M M H N rn c 0 0 0 O 0 0 O o 0 O O 0 r r r N - H O O O 0 O O E F E+ H F H a a a I 1 w w w m m m H H H 3 3 3 a a a a a a 0 0 0 z z z � � a 3 3 3 O O O O O 0 U) U) U) H H H 3 3 3 a E O E+ E-F z W N a 0 FCC w m I O F 04 " 0030 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 11:50AM 05/30/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 49720 05/30/02 ABE001 JACQUES ABELS 150.00 49721 05/30/02 BAX100 DAN BAXLEY 50.00 49722 05/30/02 BECO10 DEBORAH BECHARD 50.00 49723 05/30/02 BOB100 BILL BOBBITT 50.00 49724 05/30/02 BOY075 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF 7500.00 49725 05/30/02 BUT010 RICHARD BUTLER 150.00 49726 05/30/02 CUN100 DENNIS CUNNINGHAM 50.00 49727 05/30/02 DAV010 MIKE DAVIS 50.00 49728 05/30/02 DIA100 DENISE DIAMOND 50.00 49729 05/30/02 IMPO10 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 13278.85 49730 05/30/02 IRWO20 BARBARA IRWIN 50.00 49731 05/30/02 KIR010 TOM KIRK 75.00 49732 05/30/02 LEW010 TOM LEWIS 50.00 49733 05/30/02 LOU100 ELSE LOUDON 50.00 49734 05/30/02 MAH100 CYRILLE P MAHFOUD 50.00 49735 05/30/02 MIT150 MICHAEL MITCHELL 50.00 49736 05/30/02 MOU100 DONALD J MOULIN 50.00 49737 05/30/02 OLA100 MILTON OLANDER 50.00 49738 05/30/02 OSBO50 LEE M OSBORNE CPA. 50.00 49739 05/30/02 PLA050 CHRISTOPHER PLATAMONE 714.00 49740 05/30/02 PUE050 MARIA L PUENTE 50.00 49741 05/30/02 REY050 ELAINE REYNOLDS 50.00 49742 05/30/02 ROB150 STEVE ROBBINS 150.00 49743 05/30/02 SHA040 ROSITA SHAMIS 50.00 49744 05/30/02 SHA050 ARCHIE SHARP 50.00 49745 05/30/02 SIS100 SISCO SIGN SYS 1496.65 49746 05/30/02 STJO10 VICTORIA ST JOHNS 50.00 49747 05/30/02 TH0200 DAVID THOMS 50.00 49748 05/30/02 TOT100 TOTAL FABRICATION 225.00 49749 05/30/02 TYL050 ROBERT T TYLER 150.00 49750 05/30/02 USPO10 U S POSTMASTER 1380.00 49751 05/30/02 WEL025 WELLS FARGO BANKCARD 776.66 49752 05/30/02 WRI050 ROBERT S WRIGHT 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 27,096.16 043 0031 Z N N r O H 01 m M N M v ul r F� M N N a' co M N N O E Z N O O M �n � U U C7 U C7 C7 !J C7 U (:i C7 C7 U' C7 C7 O O W E £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ (� < W w w W W W W W W W W W W W W a m E E El F E E+ E E+ F E E E E E rn M O O O 0 0 O O O O Lo Q. c r m E 0 0 0 0 o O O O O r m r-1 M M -i Z E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W z O O o O O O O o O O v t0 r N N £ D In u) u) Ln O Ln In u7 ul m M O -W m N >+ O N •'-1 N Ol m M w a O O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O H O O O H O O O In (7 Ln (7 Lf) In N O In m In (9 In 0 In ,A z z w Ln z z o r ❑ E E E E W W £ £ Z £ Q Z r1 £ O O U O O E UU £ a a a a a a o a a a £ a m a U a z a a £ z Z £ F E F > E ry E C7 E £ E a E > F F F U U U U U U 0 0 0 a 0 x 0 a 0 z 0 0 0 a 0 U) 0 x 0 > > > > > > U ElcC E E E H U E El Ela F+ to 0 to 0 m m U E H F H a (7 m a Cc F Z U mp z a C7 C4 U fz E z s U U U U U U cac4� > fY. H 0 O z a F❑ [m.+ a H Cl F 0 z a 9 0 Z z a a OS a z U z z E z m z H Z z z Z H Z m z D z E+ F H E+ E E- EO z W D W W x W (7 w Z W 7C W £ W H W U U U U U U W > a > E > U > fA > rt: > U > £ > 4 > w w w w w w ❑ a D O x ❑ a a o D a a a a a a a U U rZ U a a U U w w w w w w W w H ❑ !z O O O C. O O O O m to m to m m O W O O O O O O O O m m D D D m 1 > N N N N N N N N O O O O 0 0 Z H ❑ H im m >+ rid+ >+ >+ r>4.14 FC z a a� a w m x 1 0 o w H Q'. O O O 0 r O O O O O O m N M CW W O O O O M O O O O O O -4 m �o 1D O O O u> O O O O O O 10 to w w EO m 01 O� 01 01 r Ol r r r r r z O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N u') V7 in Ln to N N In Lr) w w �o w %D w E+ z H H r-4 -4 r-i H m O In u) O In O O ul Lr) O Ln ul u7 u7 Ln O U ar N N V' N -W v N N M v c V R V U 1-4 rs o O 0 O O o o O 0 00 0 0 0 0 .� � H E-F E E E+ E+ H H H H H H M 0 0 0 0 0 0 ££ O m RC E+ E F F E E ru fz U [z C� ❑ Cal (a7 Ca7 Cal Cal �• U) W z z H H H H FA 1--1 14 x F U) a H 1 w U E .4 F z Z a a a'a a s Ft In W H a. D z U) H H H H H H W E rs W Gq [Q H (p m H H 4 O U U > ❑ a s .4 a a a co H to X x p � a 9 0q ❑ mm a W a a a a a a a a Cl o a cn x z w H w w w w w w a rC O U z ao a >+ U z a4 z a a a a a a 7 ❑ a a w H o H w H w ££££££ z O > O 0 L O O O O.� O OH O.-� O.-1 O m 0 O o .-1 O H 044 U E+ w X U ca >+ E+ z > FC a a a a a a u H m a w o O m D a H ££££££ ❑ m CO ❑ fY1 U ❑ ❑ H H H H H H 0032 z m rn Ln N 0)c <r m r o o k M v N N M N N � (nO 9 F Z N O O M \ N x Ln U U' U C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 0 W E. £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ E (7 a W w w w w w w W w w w w w £ W PO F E E-E F+ F. E+ F F E. E-F E F F rn M N c O O O O 0 O O O O O 0 r--1 F M 0) O O O O O O O O O O O z E W z O o 0 o O O O o C' 0 £ o m Ln r Ln n n u1 Lr) ur) Ln Tn > O H r W N O O O O O O O O O O m O O O O O O O O O (D m o Lrn a o o Q o 0 0L o a o x o .r r z Ln r RC Ln 0 Ln ry u) z Ln < u-> 4 Lrn < 'n r-+ z N O O z 0 O O O O r 0 M H W E. W H IA O] I7] H a r N a N r r a O W u) U O O O E a w a a > a a > a w a > a > a > a a w ❑< m a ❑ a x a o a ❑ ❑ a a a z U U F. QL E+ £ E FC F F E E E cw 0 >> 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W H CO to E a E. U E+ F F F E-F a E-E F E. E+ F E E R; F. a U F. Z Z Q z Z z O Ict H a. U U a U a c 7 0; W R: .4 a W fY. U CZ w ly W 0L w o3 E. oL U O H H H O H O z 0 £ O FC O £ O H O £ O £ O £ O U O H > o; a o: ❑ A: ❑ H ❑ E+ ❑ (.L ❑ E. ❑ fx ❑ F ❑ F ❑ F ❑ O ❑ z z U E F z o z z z to z O z cn z O z to z M z M z a Z 0 H (n U U W E-F W z w W W F W W w E-E W w w w w W w E w E. W w w > m > FC > > > a > > > v> > > > > > > > m > cn ❑ a s H a z z H z z z z H w W w x ar H U H x H H H H x U W N N N N N N N N N N H ❑ (1; fn (n O O O O O O O O O O O W O O O O O O O O O O O O >> > E O 0 N N N N N N N N N gN H ,Y, �C z a m w m a 1 o 0 w E IZ N �o Cl C. O 0 O O O O O N C. w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O rn o £ o ko 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 O L o 0 z r N r N rn O rn O m O rn O rn O rn O rn O rn O o) O rn O rn O E �o w In Ln In in in N N u1 Ln In z O c to IT LO O O .-4 Lr) Ln uN O u1 1� LO N Ln H O U FC O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O F F En m H ❑ H ❑ W O O O M ❑ < Lo a O a z U < W W F rz-i x " a ° ° W z a x s x z O E o w a H a PEI Pq H FC RC a 3 O W a h O O O a N a a s x a a a [�' ❑ Z £ El a w w m w H x O N N a rt 0 w a x E £ cn a U z a W x a ❑ ££ Q 0 0 a �H H 0 H w x co z H H VQ E E+ w U £ ❑ £ a U F Z ELI 0 W > O 0 O O O O O O o 0 0 O 0 O O N 1-1 O O N O 1- O - O (D 0 V) O O N Ln in O U El H a £ s E 3 a a 3 Wl a x E. r.� O CQ O < O w RC U H H N �! � o o W a(1 A1[ r 0033 z In M l0 as r-1 m 1- N O M V' to N M N M .--I N O E. z N O \ O M \ M x Ln U C7 C7 C7 0 C7 0 C7 C7 C� C7 C7 C7 O W E £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ U < W W W W W w W W W W W W £ W W EF E4 F. F E F E. E E+ E E+ E+ rn M O O O O N O O O O O O M .-i E+ O O O O l0 p O O O O O M z E. w z o 0 o O O o in O o r 0 £ D u1 In u1 In 01 N Ln N u) m V• r-1 >+ O a V N M M N O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O to O O O O O O 0 o O O O co �D O H O £ ul O x O N z Ln un 0 Ln z V7 z m u to U1 LO W N LnU co El~ O N F H H F W FC a •Mi £ E. u) £ Oq £ w W OU F O tY. W F O U F a £ U U £ a to a a a W a 3 a a o a W a a a s r.� E z z EN M E £ F E-E E-E CL E ❑ E+ > E < F x F £ E E O O a O O O x o O O O u) O a 0 m o O O o W H E F U E E a F O E F \ E F+ U E D E. 0 EI o " 0 W0 a o O W 0 z oW E- 0 0 H 0 14 (D o z z>a z U z D z z z D z O z x z D z H z C7 z z z < z H H H to w w > E+ a W > z w > E-H a W > E cn W C7 w w x W \ w z W E+ W F+ FF ❑ ❑ D > H w > O > U rz > a w > < a > co o > w w w w w m U a U x z U rs ❑ a a E£ ❑ O O l0 o o w O O o O O O O > I > N N N N O cN N clj ❑ H z N N '+ r'�+ O ❑ H `.L £ £ Ln £ N FC Z LL r� w w rn x I o O m E+ CY. o O o O as O O p O O p O W O O o O I- o O O O O o O O O O O N O O O O O O O O 01 01 Ol 0) (n 01 0) M al u) t` t` z o O O o O O o O O v M (n E Lr) Ln un Ln Ln Ln r LO �o w kD D u) o Ln O O ul O ul o in o o O N N v M N •a N v N .� H ct O p O O O p p O O o O o A ❑ p 0 z � U a U wO O z o x FC a U) m ' >+ O h E. w w rzx� I O z z H H W z Ui E+ rn H q N El O O rS W E �+ W ¢1 co x < x z U m E O z co F faA �z+ 0: a U)a F G�, E m w w >`. a a O z W w F m w O O ❑ a W CL a s Q a Z W a U U U > E OE fA Oa' U) a s m E [ra W vFi c~i) > 0 D 3 3 z O D > O u7 o if1 O C O 0 O O O O O O O 0 O ul O u') N u) N O �+ U E O >+ r1 OQ O < O < 0 m 0 h N O E+ CD a O CD rw O a O s 0 46 U H RC U W a O a x U) x to H co Elx Cn E O E >+ E-F U D W 3 W 3 0034 z r < M x O F Z N O O M � � x V (7 C7 C) O (D -.4 W W £ W OQ E.E+ rn M M O � E M O Z E w Z o £ O >+ O N a O l0kD O l0 O r Z un r O E-i E a w m a w a a a a Z F C1 E. 0 0 0 14 E. U ElF a H a, O a U a z z o z o O rz-I El E W 14 > ❑ w H E x w w H 4 a o o • w o > 1 > Gn N Z Z E H ❑ H � �, H Z ❑ H x < z a m w m a I o o w F a o 0 W o 0 w o 0 a r rn z M O LO E+ z O O O O a V V � � Q O O r-I r-I ❑ t� M CDu O x T> Z F �W FC C7 H I o a a w E G a z r a m a a a w ° a o w o M z S z E G w z O > n o O N to O O O V E-E a H U H W p < U 3 3 0) rn O r N a El E O F E+ z w E N a 041A 0035 T4ht 44Qul«fu, COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 Transmittal of Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Transmittal of Treasurer's Report dated April 30, 2002 for the City of La Quinta. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with California Government Code Section 53645 as amended 1 /1 /86; and is in conformity with City Code 3.08.010 to 3.08.070 Investment of Money and Funds. I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet next month's estimated expenditures. KhnM. 11y submitted, Jalcone ,Finance Director Approved for Submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: Treasurer's Report, City of La Quinta ME Tity4 ,(PQurNrw MEMORANDUM TO: La Quinta City Council FROM: John M. Falconer, Finance Director/Treasurer SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report for April 30, 2002 DATE: May 30, 2002 Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month ending April 30, 2002. The report is submitted to the City Council each month after a reconciliation of accounts is accomplished by the Finance Dept. The following table summarizes the changes in investment types for the month: Investment Beginning Purchased Notes Sold/Matured Other Ending Change Cash LAW $1,015,318 $17,897,411 (1) ($817,408) $197,910 ($69,121) US Treasuries (2) $58,002,697 12,999,400 (69,121) (6,980,000) 75,498 17,828,290 64 097,595 (69,121) 6,094,898 US Gov't Agencies (2) $12,980,209 2,927 12,983,136 2,927 Commercial Paper (2) $7,997,251 (8,000,000) 2,749 0 (7,997,251) Mutual Funds $8,258,923 8,501 1 8,267,424 8,501 Total 1$106,151,809 13 007 901 15 366,52 81 174 103,374,355 2 777 454 I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code; and is in conformity with the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the pools expenditure requirements for the next six months. the City of La Quinta used the Bureau of the Public Debt, U.S. Bank Monthly Statement and the Bank of New York Monthly Custodian Report to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. 4 % r D '--- John . Falconer Dat Fin ceDirector/Treasurerd Footnote (1) The amount reported represents the net increase (decrease) of deposits and withdrawals from the previous month. (2) The amount reported in the other column represents the amortization of premium/discount for the month on US Treasury, Commercial Paper and Agency investments. 04*1 003 I H I I I� I 15 UJ co LL LL E �, E E � m N N N N o V i—� it .$ a 3> a I g $�'EOeE�EaE�yE� ^ NNNNN a2E Q$ ^ ^ ^ m §cli Nyy> a Oa v ~ E �� 0,L s id L N O Z 8 � T loeo ^In �9O'�ZR 2e X ^� O O O p p j 8 8 y~ 8 0 Cl) Q ON fV O O O N N yN� h CD O pO OC a E E 2E X Q 00 :E.�¢ yyQ a0 $ E $ N N �EO �E7 aE� eE+� ^NHNHN a LL > T $ N Q Q O O O $ N aR r � to a $ 8 lL u?y88yy8 O a O O m N Gel 1 N all Gok O ao O C E5 c E 5 5 LLE $ $ $EEEEE $ N $ 1 c = Ili C c co O E E2 m a QR O Z 2 Cep maW�CJ m J 10 E m V yC tNNg O C a a E m LL m QLLQ v o o m Z j E'9 cm0Y� W w E v g a v ao •c CipcWp?4co�3r5 a 1 ]. a m c m B€ E m E E E E E c m m$ EF Z S J LL S E o �me b U e c E co m a N N m LL LL y LL LLLZ eeZ9e 1059oW N N « a m m N � ram« W d m moE UQ� c m a N 0- U. m C C C 7 m Lu Lu E Q N C' r 'I 004 !� 2 � !&�$ §§§)a wily! ■ ■■■■- ||'§§----m■ E� ---- - - - - -- | |la.......... 0 |2R-�©7/§■§§� !!§§§§§§§§§§§ |------- ---- �!ƒflfa■aa!! |!§ff777§77f7! §| § 3a| ■ 05 005 `O w Q O c �U C m C LL N C Q m c Q a� E ti CD > a C O N o >o O N o E W cn U U) CD CD a O O 0 MZZZ000 000 co 0 Ld 'p o 0 o Q Q Q to m W Lo Lo }�ZZZI.-OM O N M O O O +O+000NNN m pZZZoC-4V- ooc`�i co t- LO ticq��0> O C COf-�LOO M O O O Ct a M C v L .- N c mzz c>000Z`Z,Z. Cl) O O N > > U y m F- F- m U D » N O C m V 41 � m U a a ZCD cm N fA M V � rnUUa?a?:?O,� I >� o Z Z Z Z m IL mzZ CO, E . 7 7 7 olS Q c N d O— m m tL > cU0:4)4)4—c yd� m y LL LL 21 N c6 N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �. '° O O O O O O O a o000000 000000ao 000000rn Ne-NaI.:L6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 }2 CMDCMDNGMO�cOoc�� co co N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N p 0000��o vvvvvvv 0000000 W co O O O O O O O N O, 0000000 .thy 0000000 In C� 0000000 Oi OOOOOOw w w a oco 0000004:Fi N�NN�O�- c- Mw ci y — m O > � — �— Eco c ow moo°D�c�o��Z•zR dca m >,o m �� Euj 0a; 4) U �U ami ~ C.O. s c= C ` F y .� ONm Eg NN.mtO c U o m(L amw cn 7c o v? c C7 N C � L t 3 a� co ym Ztcm caN LO am om om om v <O (� sm ana.EcL mds"j c V V Z O m m m m m o o > O 'o2 Ui Z o'� o'c3 m'c� Z Z - m zo m y w E o =? Ca QEEEEEv�cn�d d m O O O O O m m c E sU�UUUUU �u' mE EEEEEU) U)�:4 cz0 aaa.CLCL ti c O O V E d a` O—Qi t� 1: CGo Q 1Ui c7 Lo 0 CO cn co OR C6 0 (n LO 0 m C C N U m V 1 0 15 2 N dma. c cn ._ c c E f° w� c c mm ��'a) c�w_E E a. C w N N �C- 01 C N N .N C E O c cow H� ..— E-5 vi > O� N C O c` aa3:)2 c5'IN 006 H C C N W m a C c E E � m > C ad aiS t t N H V 0 c p aro c a J y0_ 7 mo a L w w nNMO ILq �O� MOjD^ N Y! �nwaDN^-U� M co It Ln Pf O H DCOD co M�a F F�-aOo�Of M CO V Ma ON "t NI- cli N pNp N N N NON O N f0 d a N Of 00 t7 '31 C N C) Yf h S V Of ' tO cc N ao a M N n 01 Q t5 — O O 6 � p 'o n N � a c �LL ppLL 7� 'aLL 7. LL T j lL N LL y C C ti E =2 0 LLrl2&t2M LL �C V! d J C d ; �� >LL L° LL ccvdca�a�c��otyc 7LL j 7' y Q Q c d LL ua�LL(L aa a CL E o °) a. a c. XLL ..o �5 7 ° E 2c « chi Z« F'VS E c i�0 ds�Nrn a@ a m r�'ea c1uada �a >vi �ci�¢w = 1,2 vo�N i�o' .0 05.1 007 Lo ! § ■ ! ■ § ! m ! § | § ■ _& k k � f kf I | }§ f / � ! � , ; ! ! � � � ! 1 .0.000.00 " as■aaa■ R m\ © §��`_§§■! )))!)))!) 22!!!!!!2 !f!!!■!■! q5/1 008 W * 2 �,mo Y{(ppog$ R A YI ONAOm ON0 co {y'q fo�pp O �N �In 1n O A O K A 0 NOS RNA tOp CDNhN^ -Wn NU9 OD A M W 00 Q p 01 QUA NNNN cl; 1mm� �N�pp OI CollN�N y� a0 M a0 W �O OD 0O) Opp pOj fy 0�lp N q W A OV �Nd0a11 Opp pO fO V aO Nco0 „ O LL bNo]Nat AmC'� V a y r O r qy uN0 y N pNp p�p N aD� Lo pqp N N� A N eaea ^p mfV O a O V T� It Ml ��T LL A C�7 fONOII 0{O -fcz N q M N 0 aO ct Rm A 0Ol N O �r^Ao PN'/ co It OD N0 L OD�nm� O 0 CpWD OAb LL O �OrOAO cO+)��ct m p MI 40 l+! C yO� eq 0 IA OD V_y�yr 0 A O A ONnp�Co,c-,O A A O �p O A O m� O N� If)A fO �p ppf1OD 0 V IA OD OOi NOOK N� Ap]l+f 1l7 1. O LL Y10A.-OMO V O O IquA w 0� <� OD OyO� NOtODp MO G O 1ff V y �0� MM CO b N O `OA q'm ODp fD OtyyDNin $ OOp p: 0f7 �Opl OI lh OD I�NO f7A�O9 YI O LL O 'eNMA cD 01 A A 7 Y W ' N W N NN�p N T N " N V QO !V N pOpppOA tl1 0 N(p�O�071��ppp V Ip N pOp OI OpI C A t7 m �^ (- a �NfV tD0 pN fO m f7AA�NN O Of t m � Q m c y flA0 C 7 R c �61 a c C C W u t CID, n 10, V 7 y C m C. a C m Q L c~cc> mLL E c. ai �°�2 CLmy N mm W I.-. mmO7 a �inK W,U') ci w C O cl a E E E _m N y H � C O u m Q d 3 0 0 LL N a U Lm c� Z m Zcm y c m t m CD CL U � m Of O w 05t� 009 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CITY RDA RDA FA BALANCE SHEET 06=2 FIXED LONG TERM FIXED LONG TERM FINANCING LONG TERM GRAND CRY ASSETS DEBT RDA ASSETS DEBT AUTHORITY DEBT TOTAL ASSETS: POOLED CASH 10,596,351.82 6,900,828.35 (260,488.98) 17,316,691.19 LORP INVESTMENT IN POOLED CASH 670,000.00 670,000.00 INVESTMENT T-BILL/NOTES & OTHER 40,000,000.00 40,000,000.00 AUTO MALL CASH LQRP CASH 38,509.43 38.509.43 BOND REDEMPTION CASH 8.827.61 2.44 8.830 05 BOND RESERVE CASH BOND PROJECT CASH 44,887,343.44 552,249.78 45,419,593.22 BOND ESCROW CASH PETTY CASH 1,000.00 1,000.00 CASH & INVESTMENT TOTAL 50,597,351.82 52,565,508.83 291,763.24 103,464,623.89 INVESTMENT IN LAND HELD FOR RESALE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 45,357.22 60,900.00 106,257.22 PREMIUM/DISCOUNTONINVESTMENT (27,159.62) (53,109.14) (80,268.76) LQRP-ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 46.988.80 46,988.80 INTEREST RECEIVABLE 34,067.62 34,067.62 LOAN/NOTES RECEIVABLE 13,489,403.69 13,489,403.69 DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES 820.898.89 820,898.89 DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES - CVAG 2,299,096.69 2,299,096.69 CVAG ALLOWANCE (2,299,096.69) (2,299,096.69) DUE FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTS 0.37 0.37 DUE FROM OTHER FUNDS 551.038.04 551,038.04 DUE FROM RDA 8.497.550.20 8,497,550.20 INTEREST ADVANCE -DUE FROM RDA 3,834,610.88 3,834,6/0.88 ADVANCES TO OTHER FUNDS 56,483.22 2,745,618.71 2,802,101.93 NSF CHECKS RECEIVABLE 2,656.86 2,666.86 ACCRUED REVENUE 833.40 833.40 FOXED ASSETS 20,711,742.00 20,711,742.00 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION 711,534.48 711,534.48 TRAVEL ADVANCES 3,679.00 3,679,00 EMPLOYEE ADVANCES PREPAID EXPENSES 15 496.25 15,496.25 RECEIVABLE TOTAL 13,995,185.37 20,711,742.00 16,841,673.50 51,548,600.87 WORKER COMPENSATION DEPOSIT RENT DEPOSITS UTILITY DEPOSITS 75.00 75.00 MISC. DEPOSITS 2,100.00 2,100.00 DEPOSITS TOTAL 2.175.00 2,175.00 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS 9,9W.279.05 9,9W.279.05 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AMOUNT AVAILABLE TO RETIRE L/f DEBT 3,395,117.03 3,395,117.03 AMOUNT TO BE PROVIDED FOR L/T DEBT 951,847.65 80,866,860.97 7,750,000.00 89,568,706.62 TOTAL OTHER ASSETS 951.847.65 9,988,279.05 64,261,978.00 7,750,000.00 102,952,104.70 TOTAL ASSETS 64.594.712,19 _ _20.711,742.00 951.847.65 69.407.182.33 9,988,279.05 84.261.978.00 291.763.24 7.7 LIABILITIES: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 13,650.17 13,650.17 DUE TO OTHER AGENCIES 1,385,318.07 1,385,318.07 DUE TO OTHER FUNDS 1,499,665.54 1,499,665.54 INTEREST ADVANCE -DUE TO CITY 2,745,618.71 11,383,537.00 14,129,155.71 ACCRUED EXPENSES 16,468.50 16,468.50 PAYROLL LIABILITIES 6,605.76 6,605.76 STRONG MOTION INSTRUMENTS 725.55 725.55 FRINGE TOED LIZARD FEES 78,982.28 78,982.28 SUSPENSE 138.812.23 138,812.23 DUE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA PAYABLES TOTAL 4,369,712.77 12,899,671.04 17,269,383.81 ENGINEERING TRUST DEPOSITS SO. COAST AIR QUALITY DEPOSITS LQRP DEPOSITS 14,795.00 14,795.00 DEVELOPER DEPOSITS 898,173.26 896,173.26 MISC. DEPOSITS 438.723.66 438,723.86 AGENCY FUND DEPOSITS 1.551.010.69 1,551,010.69 TOTAL DEPOSITS 2,887,907.61 14,795.00 2,902,702.61 DEFERRED REVENUE 934,698.89 11,378 904.00 12,313,602.89 OTHER LIABILITIES TOTAL 934,698.89 11,378,904.00 12,313,602.89 COMPENSATED ABSENCES PAYABLE 373,536.65 373,536.65 DUE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA 578,311.00 189,725.50 768,036.50 DUE TO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 10,989,847.00 10,989,847.00 DUE TO C.V. UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. 8,747,405.50 8,747,405.50 DUE TO DESERT SANDS SCHOOL DIST. BONDS PAYABLE 64,335,000.00 7,750,000.00 72,085000.00 TOTAL LONG TERM DEBT 951.847.65 84,261,978.00 7,750,000.00 92,963,825.65 TOTAL LIABILITIES 8,192,319.27 951,847.65 24,293,370.04 84,261,978.00 7,750,000.00 125,449,514.96 EQUITY -FUND BALANCE TOTAL LIABILITY & EQUITY CASH & INVESTMENT TOTAL PREMIUMIDISGOUNT ON INVESTMENT TOTAL 56,402,392.97 20,711,742.00 45,113,812.29 9,988,279.05 291.763.24 132.507.989.55 64,594,712.24 20,711,742.00 951,847.65 69,407,182.33 9,986,279.05 84261,97800 29176324 775000000 25795750451 (0.05) (0.00) (0.051 103,464,623.89 (80, 62,76) /'� 103,374,355.13 1 l 5 010 @ @000 o ' Ln .4 to 2livi £ 2q% qe@ �nn � �£aa$ $ -aaaaR ° `gfg22k f$ggmq �-N- N Upton U) §*.R0(7) §£/W)P— •m�s�n� �wrww w , ��e$ 22vL� §¥KKKnrl wco ® a� «(62C14-- 2-- �coU. R � �( k§Ci09g(k( Cl) m�w��]w--- E\r-j/{j E��k§a§ R§3w- n Rwwww°to EGG&t�4 Ewoac,4 e-S�e�A &©o�gwU? 44ww m 2(D0coto to IvK®® � 9q§&04rl- 0£KKKG§ cm 0V�n04 n o(Dcoaa (0 )ar*«na �@@ar_a agaamVq a4Q§ma2 e $�www $oCOCOCO �KK((GK kK(K(R( 0)CNCin�Lo I-nn ■�4aa + ■&aco0~(6 a@@® @@@o@ \�k2k« \C! C404 ��nVn v —3(D(D(Dto (D S kk . \�a //a kE k\k «D a.]\) ƒ}\) 522E 220E § &&&� ffE,— &A&f f/� ww2ƒ2 EEEO www$2 ){§ 22k��i22zf$ ]ƒ %501 k�2�� kmk£Lo� q � OI )�)J)� )kk))§ §li cFM OF9 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: CONSENT CALENDAR: 3 ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: June 18, 2002 PUBLIC HEARING: Transmittal of Revenue and Expenditure Report for April 30, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Transmittal of the Statement of Revenue and Expenditures for April 30, 2002. Ily submitted, J hn M. Falconer, 'Finance Director rov d for submissi n homas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Revenue and Expenditures for April 30, 2002 1 CITY OF LA QUINTA REVENUES - ALL FUNDS 07/01/2001 - 04/30/2002 FUNDS BUDGET RECEIVED RECEIVED General $15,928,908.75 $14,244,950.33 89.4% Library 95,000.00 91,662.37 96.5% Gas Tax Revenue 435,318.27 483,209.82 111.0% Cmaq/Istea 287,423.00 0.00 0.0% Federal Assistance 543,825.00 305,617.99 56.2% Assessment District 2000-1 0.00 14,145.99 0.0% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 102,391.75 101,982.44 99.6% Local Law Enforcement 27,004.00 27,356.56 101.3% Lighting & Landscaping 781,400.00 407,576.75 52.2% Quimby 16,500.00 139,901.28 847.9% Infrastructure 11,000.00 103,351.36 939.6% Village Parking 100.00 0.00 0.0% South Coast Air Quality 24,481.00 22,485.05 91.8% LQ Public Safety Officer 2,200.00 2,341.23 106.4% Interest Allocation 0.00 233,681.52 0.0% Capital Improvement 57,881,592.76 12,050,708.75 20.8% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 450.90 0.0% Urban Forestry 11,000.00 9,900.00 90.0% Equipment Replacement 363,180.00 364,700.08 100.4% Information Technology 1,000,000.00 1,020,093.54 102.0% Arts In Public Places 132,900.00 103,087.65 77.6% Transportation 307,100.00 579,237.32 188.6% Parks & Recreation 221,500.00 330,255.50 149.1 % Civic Center 323,100.00 459,055.13 142.1% Library Development 167,900.00 187,197.98 111.5% Community Center 58,600.00 84,295.52 143.8% Street Facility 10,500.00 17,826.18 169.8% Park Facility 3,200.00 4,744.91 148.3% La Quinta Financing Authority 688,544.00 702,880.25 102.1 % RDA Project Area No. 1 80,489,860.00 69,833,319.10 86.8% RDA Project Area No. 2 11,376,903.00 5,109,538.10 44.9% Total $171 291 431.53 $107 035 553.60 62.5% 059 003 CITY OF LA QUINTA EXPENDITURES - ALL FUNDS 07/01/2001 - 04/30/2002 FUNDs BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED REMAINING BUDGET % EXPENDED General $17,007,616.54 $11,095,552.13 $35,249.94 $5,876,814.47 65.2% Library 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Gas Tax 594,378.00 351,333.30 0.00 243,044.70 59.1% Cmaq/Istea 287,423.00 0.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.0% Federal Assistance 166,638.99 31,813.99 0.00 134,825.00 19.1% Proposed Assessment District 682,553.47 571,335.68 0.00 111,217.79 83.7% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 100,191.75 83,939.25 0.00 16,252.50 83.8% Local Law Enforcement 0.00 1,819.63 0.00 (1,819.63) 0.0% Lighting & Landscaping 781,400.00 651,166.70 0.00 130,233.30 83.3% Quimby 382,806.29 255,915.92 0.00 126,890.37 66.9% Infrastructure 3,085,766.00 597,647.18 0.00 2,488,118.82 19.4% Village Parking (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% South Coast Air Quality 0.00 6,977.81 0.00 (6,977.81) 0.0% Lq Public Safety Officer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Interest Allocation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Capital Improvement 57,881,593.11 12,050,708.74 6,066.43 45,824,817.94 20.8% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 63,579.59 0.00 (63,579.59) 0.0% Urban Forestry 11,000.00 9,900.00 0.00 1,100.00 90.0% Equipment Replacement 380,209.00 138,209.69 47,987.47 194,011.84 36.4% Arts In Public Places 689,515.71 72,875.21 0.00 616,640.50 10.6% Transportation 3,035,989.00 531,441.99 0.00 2,504,547.01 17.5% Parks & Recreation 4,508,263.00 297,355.71 0.00 4,210,907.29 6.6% Civic Center 204,660.00 173,426.70 0.00 31,233.30 84.7% Library Development 623,324.00 40,349.26 0.00 582,974.74 6.5% Community Center 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Street Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Park Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Information Technology 476,372.00 289,709.89 1,899.66 184,762.45 60.8% La Quinta Financing Authority 1,209,498.78 1,057,235.40 0.00 152,263.38 87.4% RDA Project Area No. 1 51,752,942.46 39,836,227.64 0.00 11,916,714.82 77.0% RDA Project Area No. 2 16,842,472.44 7,926,382.23 6,400.00 8,909,690.21 47.1 % Total $160 702 720.69 $76 134,903.64 $97 603.50 1 $84,470,213:55 47.4% 060 004 07101/2001 - 04/30/2002 CITY OF LA QUINTA GENERAL FUND REVENUES DETAIL TAXES: Property Tax No Low Property Tax Distribution Document Transfer Tax Sales Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Franchise Tax TOTAL TAXES LICENSE & PERMITS: Business License Animal License Building Permits Plumbing Permits Electrical Permits Mechanical Permits Misc. Permits . TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS FEES: Sale of Maps & Publications Community Services Fees Bldg & Safety Fees Community Development Fees Public Works Fees TOTAL FEES INTERGOVERNMENTAL Motor Vehicle In -Lieu Motor Vehicle Code Fines Parking Violations Misc. Fines AB939 State of California Grant Fire servicesCredit CSA152 Assessment TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL INTEREST Gain on sale of investments MISCELLANEOUS Miscellaneous Revenue Cash Over/(Short) TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFERIN TOTAL GENERAL FUND REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 520,600.00 357,063.62 163,536.38 68.590% 450,600.00 486,951.26 (36,351.26) 108.070% 380,000.00 340,715.82 39,284.18 89.660% 3,217,500.00 2,667,638.68 549,861.32 82.910% 3,595,000.00 2,835,272.23 759,727.77 78.870% 537,500.00 317,670.36 219,829.64 59.100% 8,701,200.00 7,005,311.97 1,695,888.03 80.510% 152,000.00 139,993.10 12,006.90 92.100% 12,400.00 10,143.25 2,256.75 81.800% 412,500.00 927,133.20 (514,633.20) 224.760% 89,400.00 148,412.38 (59,012.38) 166.010% 68,000.00 158,443.07 (90,443.07) 233.000% 37,000.00 85,409.22 (48,409.22) 230.840% 48,300.00 39,114.98 9,185.02 80.980% 819,600.00 1,508,649.20 (689,049.20) 184.070% 2,150.00 854.98 1,295.02 39.770% 157,825.00 137,446.51 20,378.49 87.090% 357,950.00 609,935.92 (251,985.92) 170.400% 222,000.00 186,231.01 35,768.99 83.890% 468,550.00 512,572.98 (44,022.98) 109.400% 1,208,475.00 1,447,041.40 (238,566.40) 119.740% 1,257,600.00 1,081,839.63 175,760.37 86.020% 50,300.00 28,650.16 21,649.84 56.960% 25,000.00 42,904.00 (17,904.00) 171.620% 5,000.00 12,471.71 (7,471.71) 249.430% 159,900.00 120,136.59 39,763.41 75.130% 134,105.00 107,456.45 26,648.55 80.130% 1,595,979.00 798,744.00 797,235.00 50.050% 126,700.00 32,309.17 94,390.83 25.500% 3,354,584.00 2,224,511.71 1,130,072.29 66.310% 1,535,600.00 1,471,158.20 64,441.80 95.800% 0.00 461,082.85 (461,082.85) 0.000% 27,700.00 41,568.61 (13,868.61) 150.070% 0.00 (132.49) 132.49 0.000% 27,700.00 41,436.12 (13,736.12) 149.590% 281,749.75 85,758.88 195,990.87 30.440% 15 928,908.75 14,244,950.33 1,683,958.42 89.430% 061 005 CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL LIBRARY: County of Riverside Interest TOTAL LIBRARY GAS TAX REVENUE: Section 2105 Section 2106 Section 2107 Section 2107.5 Traffic Congestion Relief Interest TOTAL GAS TAX C MAQ/ISTEA CMAQ/ISTEA Grant Interest TOTAL CMAQ/ISTEA FEDERAL ASSISTANCE REVENUE: CDBG Grant Interest TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1 Interest Assessment Bond Proceeds Prepayments -sewer assessments Transfer in TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SLESF (COPS) REVENUE: SLESF (Cops) Funding Interest TOTAL SLESF (COPS) LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT REVENUE: LLEBG Funding Interest Transfer in TOTAL LLEBG LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING REVENUE: Assessment Developer Interest TOTAL LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING QUIMBY REVENUE: Quimby Fees Interest TOTAL QUIMBY REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 75,000.00 75,000.00 0.00 100.000% 20,000.00 16,662.37 3,337.63 83.310% 95,000.00 91,662.37 3,337.63 96.490% 135,600.00 135,724.82 (124.82) 100.090% 98,200.00 93,767.23 4,432.77 95.490% 175,100.00 177,939.93 (2,839.93) 101,620% 5,000.00 6,000.00 (1,000.00) 120.000% 13,718.27 59,842.05 (46,123.78) 436.220% 7,700.00 9,935.79 (2,235.79) 129.040% 435,318.27 483,209.82 (47,891.55) 111.000% 287,423.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 287 423.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.000% 543,825.00 305,617.99 238,207.01 56.200% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 543 825.00 305,617.99 238,207.01 56.200% 14,145.99 (14,145.99) 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 14145.99 (14,145.99) 0.000% 100,191.75 100,191.75 0.00 100.000% 2,200.00 1,790.69 409.31 81.400% _ 102391.75 101,982.44 409.31 99.600% 26,704.00 26,704.00 0.00 100.000% 300.00 652.56 (352.56) 217.520% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 27 004.00 27 356.56 (352.56) 101.310% 781,400.00 407,576.75 373,823.25 52.160% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 781 400.00 407 576.75 373,823.25 52.160% 126,375.00 (126,375.00) 0.000% 16,500.00 13,526.28 2,973.72 81.980% 16 500.00 139 901.28 (123,401.28) 847.890% 006 CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) INFRASTRUCTURE REVENUE: Infrastructure Fee Interest Transfer in TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE VILLAGE PARKING REVENUE: Interest TOTAL VILLAGE PARKING SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY REVENUE: S.C.A.Q. Contribution Interest TOTAL SCAQ LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER FUND Transferin Interest TOTAL LQ PUBLIC SAFETY INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND: Pooled Cash Allocated Interest Transfer In TOTAL INTEREST ALLOCATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: CVAG CVWD County of Riverside State of Ca- Office Emer. Services JPIA IID DSUSD State of California SB300 Funding Surface Transportation SB821-Bicycle Path Grant APP Contribution Developer Agreement Funding Transfers in From Other Funds TOTAL CIP REVENUE LQ NORTE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: Prepayment Bond Proceeds Interest TOTAL LQ NORTE CIP URBAN FORESTRY Grant Revenue Interest TOTAL URBAN FORESTRY REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 0.00 0.00 0.000% 11,000.00 103,351.36 (92,351.36) 939.560% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 11 000.00 103 351.36 (92,351.36) 939.560% 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.000% 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.000% 21,881.00 20,933.46 947.54 95.670% 2,600.00 1,551.59 1,048.41 59.680% 24 481.00 22,485.05 1,995.95 91.850% 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 100.000% 200.00 341.23 (141.23) 170.620% 2,200.00 2,341.23 (141.23) 106.420% 233,681.52 (233,681.52) 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 233 681.52 (233,681.52) 0.000% 13,655,958.18 2,399,662.12 11,256,296.06 17.570% 1,709,906.00 0.00 1,709,906.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 100.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 530,600.00 0.00 530,600.00 0.000% 19,365.74 0.00 19,365.74 0.000% 12,000,118.00 0.00 12,000,118.00 0.000% 93,175.00 37,822.00 55,353.00 40.590% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 182,142.84 59,149.77 122,993.07 32.470% 29,665,327.00 9,529,074.86 20,136,252.14 32.120% 57 881 592.76 12,050,708.75 45,830,884.01 20.820% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 450.90 (450.90) 0.000% 0.00 450.90 (450.90) 0.000% 11,000.00 9,900.00 1,100.00 90.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 11000.00 9,900.00 1,100.00 90.000% 00 CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND: REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED Equipment Charges 304,980.00 304,982.00 (2.00) 100.000% Capital Contribution 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 58,200.00 59,718.08 (1,518.08) 102.610% Transfers In 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 363 180.00 364,700.08 (1,520.08) 100.420% INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND: Charges for services 0.00 0.00 0.000% Capital Contribution 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 20,093.54 (20,093.54) 0.000% Transfers In 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 100.000% TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1,000,000.00 1,020,093.54 (20,093.54) 102.010% ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES REVENUE: Arts in Public Places Arts in Public Places Credits Applied Interest TOTAL ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES TRANSPORTATION Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL TRANSPORTATION PARKS & RECREATION Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION CIVIC CENTER Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL CIVIC CENTER LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY CENTER Developer fees Interest TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 111,300.00 84,257.35 27,042.65 75.700% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 21,600.00 18,830.30 2,769.70 87.180% 132 900.00 103 087.65 29,812.35 77.570% 284,000.00 484,473.46 (200,473.46) 170.590% 23,100.00 94,763.86 (71,663.86) 410.230% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 307 100.00 579 237.32 (272 137.32) 188.620% 201,000.00 286,150.00 (85,150.00) 142.360% 20,500.00 44,105.50 (23,605.50) 215.150% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 221 500.00 330 255.50 (108 755.50) 149.100% 284,500.00 424,009.79 (139,509.79) 149.040% 38,600.00 35,045.34 3,554.66 90.790% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 323 100.00 459 055.13 (135 955.13) 142.080% 150,000.00 168,233.00 (18,233.00) 112.160% 17,900.00 18,964.98 (1,064.98) 105.950% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 167 900.00 187 197.98 (19 297.98) 111.490% 53,500.00 76,236.00 (22,736.00) 142.500% 5,100.00 8,059.52 (2,959.52) 158.030% 58 600.00 84 295.52 (25 695.52) 143.850% 064 n�)v CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) STREET FACILITY PARK FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL STREET FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL PARK FACILITY REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 9,500.00 16,051.22 (6,551.22) 168.960% 1,000.00 1,774.96 (774.96) 177.500% 10 500.00 17 826.18 (7,326.18) 169.770% 3,000.00 4,275.00 (1,275.00) 142.500% 200.00 469.91 (269.91) 234.960% 3,200.00 4,744.91 (1 544.91) 148.280% M 009 07/01 /2001 - 04/30/2002 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT REMAINING % BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED GENERAL GOVERNMENT: LEGISLATIVE 585,800.00 377,143.73 0.00 208,656.27 64.4% CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 613,200.00 448,365.87 0.00 164,834.13 73.1 % ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 935,000.00 606,443.26 0.00 328,556.74 64.9% PERSONNEL/RISK MGT 572,872.00 456,595.24 0.00 116.276.76 79.7% TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 2,706,872.00 1,888.548.10 0.00 818,323.90 69.8% FINANCE: FISCAL SERVICES 542,515.00 445,126.00 0.00 97,389.00 82.0% CENTRAL SERVICES 311,205.00 233,687.96 0.00 77,517.04 75.1% TOTAL FINANCE 853,720.00 678,813.96 0.00 174,906.04 79.5% CITY CLERK 373,750.00 287,005.30 0.00 86,744.70 76.8% COMMUNITY SERVICES SENIOR CENTER 265,475.00 197.198.28 0.00 68,276.72 74.3% PARKS & RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 813,258.00 523.995.77 0.00 289,262.23 64.4% PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAMS 90,800.00 50,805.83 0.00 39,994.17 56.0% TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 1,169,533.00 771,999.88 0.00 397.533.12 66.0% POLICE 4,189,385.75 2,294.997.24 0.00 1,894,388.51 54.8% BUILDING & SAFETY: BUILDING & SAFETY- ADMIN 179,700.00 156,460.35 0.00 23,239.65 87.1% CODE COMPLIANCE 478,484.00 329,421.42 0.00 149,062.58 68.8% ANIMAL CONTROL 166,043.00 124,507.37 0.00 41,535.63 75.0% BUILDING 713,488.00 534,782.07 0.00 178,705.93 75.0% EMERGENCY SERVICES 96,524.00 79,153.20 1.118.75 16,252.05 82.0% FIRE 1,663,257.00 832,596.24 0.00 830,660.76 50.1% CIVIC CENTER BUILDING -OPERATIONS 1,088,751.00 1,044,949.61 0.00 43,801.39 96.0% TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY 4,386,247.00 3,101,870.26 1,118.75 1,283,257.99 70.7% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT-ADMIN 472,450.00 302,810.96 0.00 169,639.04 64.1% CURRENT PLANNING 814,807.00 456,742.62 934.08 357,130.30 56.1% TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1.287,257.00 759,553.58 934.08 526,769.34 59.0% PUBLIC WORKS: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 336,100.00 222,742.42 1,000.00 112,357.58 66.3% DEVELOPMENT & TRAFFIC 943,668.00 662,370.02 2,500.00 278,797.98 70.2% MAINT/OPERATIONS- STREETS 1,431,059.00 478,273.46 0.00 952,785.54 33.4% MAINT/OPERATIONS - LTG/LANDSCAPING 1,359,699.00 996,458.19 29,697.11 333,543.70 73.3% CAPITAL PROJECTS 387,420.00 146,200.61 0.00 241,219.39 37.7% TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 4,457,946.00 2,506,044.70 33,197.11 1,918,704.19 56.2% TRANSFERS OUT 1,706,691.00 1,439,550.13 0.00 267,140.87 84.3% GENERAL FUND REIMBURSEMENTS (4,123,785.21) (2,632,831.02) 0.00 (1,490,954.19) 63.8% NET GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 17,007,616.54 11,095,552.13 35 249.94 5,876,814.47 65.2% nor_± 010 CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2001 - 04/30/2002 OTHER CITY FUNDS REMAINING % EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED LIBRARY FUND: PROJECT EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% GAS TAX REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 421,600.00 351,333.30 0.00 70,266.70 83.3% TRANSFER OUT 172,778.00 0.00 0.00 172,778.00 0.0% REIMBURSE GE TOTAL GAS TAX 594 378.00 351 333.30 0.00 243 044.70 59.1% QUIMBY FUND: TRANSFER OUT 382 806.29 255 915.92 0.00 126 890.37 66.9% FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND: TRANSFER OUT 166,638.99 31 813.99 0.00 134 825.00 19.1 % SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 6,977.81 0.00 (6,977.81) 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 0.00 6,977.81 0.00 (6,977.81) 0.0% CMAQ/ISTEA TRANSFER OUT 287,423.00 0.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.0% VILLAGE Parking TRANSFER OUT (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRIBUTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% LLEBG FUND TRANSFER OUT 0.00 1,819.63 0.00 (1,819.63) 0.0% SLESF(COPS) TRANSFER OUT 100,191.75 83 939.25 0.00 16 252.50 83.8% LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DIST: REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 781,400.00 651,166.70 0.00 130,233.30 83.3% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL LTG/LANDSCAPING FUND 781,400.00 651 166.70 0.00 130 233.30 83.3% INFRASTRUCTURE FUND CONSTRUCTION 4,670.00 4,670.00 0.00 0.00 100.0% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 3,081,096.00 592,977.18 0.00 2,488,118.82 19.2% TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE 3,085,766.00 597 647.18 0.00 2,486,118.82 19.4% ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1 COSTS OF ISSUANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER TO AGENCY FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 682,553.47 571,335.68 0.00 111,217.79 83.7% TOTAL AD 2000-1 682,553.47 571,335.68 0.00 111 217.79 83.7% 067 Oil CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2001 - 04/30/2002 OTHER CITY FUNDS REMAINING % EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 3,035,989.00 531,441.99 0.00 2,504,547.01 17.5% TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 3,035,989.00 531 441.99 0.00 2,504 547.01 17.5% PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 4,508,263.00 297,355.71 0.00 4,210,907.29 6.6% TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 4,508,263.00 297 355.71 0.00 4,210,907.29 6.6% CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM COSTS 2,876.70 0.00 (2,876.70) 0.0% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 204,660.00 170,550.00 0.00 34,110.00 83.3% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL CIVIC CENTER 204 660.00 173 426.70 0.00 31,233.30 84.7% LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 623,324.00 40,349.26 0.00 582,974.74 6.5% TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 623,324.00 40,349.26 0.00 582 974.74 6.5% COMMUNITY CENTER PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% STREET FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL STREET FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% PARK FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL PARK FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 &00 0.0% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 56,562,669.34 11,755,257.72 6,066.43 44,801,345.19 20.8% PROJECT REIMBURSEMENTS TO GEN FUND 1,318,923.77 295,451.02 0.00 1,023,472.75 22.4% TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 57,881,593.11 12 050 708.74 6,066.43 45 824 817.94 20.8% ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND MAINTENANCE EXPENSES-APP 2,000.00 1,690.00 0.00 310.00 84.5% OPERATING EXPENSES-APP 5,000.00 (601.50) 0.00 5,601.50 -12.0% ART PURCHASES 265,340.00 27,737.50 0.00 237,602.50 10.5% TRANSFER OUT 417,175.71 44,049.21 0.00 373,126.50 10.6% TOTAL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES 689,515.71 72 875.21 0.00 616,640.50 10.6% LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND PROJECT EXPENSES 0.00 4,176.20 0.00 (4,176.20) 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 59 403.39 0.00 (59 403.39) 0.0% TOTAL LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND 0.00 63 579.59 0.00 (63 579.59) 0.0% URBAN FORESTRY GRANT TRANSFER OUT 11,000.00 9,900.00 0.00 1,100.00 90.0% VILLAGE PARKING TRANSFER OUT (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 476 372.00 289 709.89 1,899.66 184 762.45 60.8% EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 380 209.00 138 209.69 47,987.47 194 011.84 36.4% 7 012 Ti6t 4 4Qut«tw COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Certificates of Acceptance for Deeds or Other Conveyances Pursuant to Agreements Approved by the City Council RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council authorizing the City Manager to execute Certificates of Acceptance for Deeds or Other Conveyances Pursuant to Agreements Approved by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None for this action. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The City Council does, from time to time, authorize acquisition of easements and/or real property. The Government Code requires a resolution or certificate of acceptance from the City prior to recordation of such transactions. The proposed Resolution grants the City Manager authority to execute acceptance and consent of such deeds and grants on behalf of the City. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council authorizing the City Manager to execute Certificates of Acceptance for Deeds or Other Conveyances Pursuant to Agreements Approved by the City Council; or g:k'sdoc/mw/deeds61802 069 2. Do not adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Certificates of Acceptance for Deeds or Other Conveyances; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, �N� � 1--- Mark Weiss Assistant City Manager Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 070 g:Vsdoc/mw/deeds61802 002 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CERTIFICATES OF ACCEPTANCE FOR DEEDS OR OTHER CONVEYANCES PURSUANT TO AGREEMENTS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, Government Code Section 27281 requires that no deed or grant of real property to a governmental entity may be recorded unless it is accompanied by a resolution or certificate of acceptance by the governmental entity; WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta may, by resolution as provided in Government Code Section 27281, authorize an officer or agent to accept and consent to a deed or grant conveying real property to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. The City Manager is authorized to accept and consent to all deeds and grants conveying an interest or easement upon real estate to the City of La Quinta for public purposes where such conveyance is made pursuant to an agreement which was approved the City Council of the City of La Quinta. The City Manager is authorized on behalf of the City of La Quinta to execute acceptance and consent of such as set forth in Section 27281 of the Government Code. SECTION 2. If the City Manager is unavailable to issue and execute the acceptance and consent, the Assistant City Manager is so authorized. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 18`h day of June, 2002, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Council Members NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ') 7.1 003 119/015610-0002 291210.01 PM02 ATTEST: JUKE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON , City Attorney City of La Quinta, California ()7^ 004 119/015610-0002 191210.01 AM02 '�- AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: ,tune 18, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Adoption of a Resolution Requesting PUBLIC HEARING: the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside to Consolidate a General Municipal Election to be Held on Tuesday, November 5, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside to consolidate a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 5, 2002, with the Statewide General Election to be held on that date pursuant to Code Section 10403 of the Elections Code. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The Riverside County Registrar of Voters has provided a cost estimate to the City for this election of $27,000 which has been included in the FY 2002-2003 budget (Account No. 101-201-605-000) for approval. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Code Section 10403 of the Elections Code of the State of California provides that the City Council may request the county elections department to consolidate the General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election. The City of La Quinta has consolidated General Municipal Elections with the County since its incorporation. The proposed Resolution, included in this staff report, is for the purpose of requesting those services for the Election to be held on November 5, 2002. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: n 1 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council, requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside to consolidate a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 5, 2002, with the Statewide General Election to be held on that date pursuant to Code Section 10403 of the Elections Code; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside to consolidate a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 5, 2002, with the Statewide General Election to be held on that date pursuant to Code Section 10403 of the Elections Code; or 3. Provide alternative direction to staff. Respectfully submitted, June S r ek, CMC/AAE City Clerk Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 074 (102 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2002 WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE PURSUANT TO CODE SECTION § 10403 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta called a General Municipal Election to be held in the City of La Quinta, California, on November 5, 2002 for the purpose of the election of a Mayor and two (2) Members of the City Council; and WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal Election be consolidated with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date and that within the City of La Quinta the precincts, polling places and election officers of the two elections to be the same, and that the county election department of the County of Riverside canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election and that the election be held in all respects as if there were only one election; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: 1. . That pursuant to the requirement of § 10403 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside is hereby requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of the General Municipal Election of November 5, 2002 for the purpose of the election of a Mayor and two (2) Members of the City Council. 2. That the county election department is authorized to canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election. The election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election, and only one form of ballot shall be used. 3. That the Board of Supervisors is requested to issue instructions to the county election department to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election. 4. That the City of La Quinta recognizes that additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason of this consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County for any costs. n75 003 5. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Board of Supervisors and the county election department of the County of Riverside. 6. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on June 18, 2002. JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California [SEAL] APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson , City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 076 On4 T4'lvl 4 XA Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 Adoption of a Resolution Calling and Giving Notice of the Holding of a General Municipal Election on Tuesday, November 5, 2002, for the Election of Certain Officers as Required by the Provisions of the Laws of the State of California RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council calling and giving notice of the holding of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 5, 2002, for the election of certain officers as required by the provisions of the laws of the State of California. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The Elections Code of the State of California requires a Resolution be adopted by the City Council calling a General Municipal Election for the purpose of electing Municipal Officers to the terms prescribed by the laws of that City. The proposed resolution meets the requirements of the Elections Code. Certified copies will be forwarded to the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors and Registrar of Voters along with the Resolution requesting consolidation if that is the Council's desire. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 077 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council calling and giving notice of the holding of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 7, 2000, for the election of certain officers as required by the provisions of the laws of the State of California; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council calling and giving notice of the holding of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 7, 2000, for the election of certain officers as required by the provisions of the laws of the State of California; or 3. Provide alternative direction to staff. Respectfully submitted, Ju Greek, CIVIC City Clerk Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager n78 002 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2002 FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws of the State of California, a General Municipal Election shall be held on Tuesday, November 5, 2002, for the election of Municipal Officers; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: 1. That pursuant to the requirements of the State of California relating to General Law and Charter Cities there is called and ordered to be held in the City of La Quinta, California, on Tuesday, November 5, 2002, a General Municipal Election for the purpose of election one (1) Mayor for the full term of two years and two (2) Members of the City Council for the full term of four years. 2. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in the form and content as required by law. 3. That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies, equipment and paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election 4. That the polls for the election shall be open at seven o'clock a.m. of the day of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o'clock p.m. of the same day when the polls shall be closed, except as provided in § 14401 of the Elections Code of the State of California. 5. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections. 6. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give further notice of the election, in time, form and manner as required by law. n79 nn3 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- CALLING ELECTION NOVEMBER 5, 2002 PAGE 2 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of June, 2002 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California [SEAL] APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California r)gn An4 Ti4 4 XP Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 Authorization for Overnight Travel for the Personnel/Risk Manager to Attend the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority Annual Risk Management Conference to be Held September 11 through 13, 2002, in Santa Barbara, California RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 91 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Personnel/Risk Manager to attend the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) Risk Management Conference to be held September 11 through 13, 2002, in Santa Barbara, California. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Travel expenses will be funded from the Travel, Training and Meetings Account No. 101-104-637-000. The breakdown of estimated expenditures for this conference is as follows: Registration $ 320 Meals 250 Hotel 358 Travel 100 Total $1,028 CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The CJPIA sponsors an annual Risk Management Conference that offers a variety of speakers and educational materials on various risk management topics. The conference will provide the City with the opportunity to obtain the latest information 1)81 concerning risk management issues. An overview of the conference is attached Attachment 1►. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Personnel/Risk Manager to attend the CJPIA Conference, to be held September 11 through 13, 2002, in Santa Barbara, California; or 2. Do not approve the request for overnight travel; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Conference overview. 08/1 1 /99 SACITYMGR\CCSHELL.WPD 082 saft Yfioz I YrS cl ATTACHMENT 1 CALIFORNIA 1PIA 7TE1 ANNUAL RISK MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE w5i , 1 1-1 SAt iTA BARBA RA Sonomop 11*13, 2002 4- Al M, It'd "N" �,V k N 4 SIR w,f s Does creating an injury and Illness Prevention Program (IIPP) seem overwhelming? Dees your, program need review, but you don't know where to x begin? This pre -Conference workshop will get you on the right. track. The half -day workshop, with a Iimited attendance of 40 participants, is a working session designed to help you ensure that your agency's program meets state and federal requirements. CALIfiORMA JPIA: The CALIF IORNIA JPIA is the largest municipal self insurance pool in the state and has been serving its members since 1978. Members take an active :role in determining the programs and services that will be provided to the pool. A progressive risk management agency concerned NAth preventing and alleviating risk wherever possible, the CALIFORNIA,tPIA. strives to ensure it continues to be on the cutting=edge serving the members. The CALIFORNIA JPIA has a risk- sharing pool for` general: liability and workers' compensation and obtains group -purchased insurance for its members for all-risk property, auto, earthquake, environmental and A L I F R N I# P 1A fidelity exposures. ) CALIFORNIA JPIA 7th Annual Risk Management Conference September 11-13, 2002 Santa Barbara, California Register before July 19 and receive discounted rates! Final registration deadline is August 8, 2002. Conference registration includes both days of seminars, two continental breakfasts, one lunch, pre -conference welcome dinner, casino night and all conference materials. To register: Register online at wwwcjpia.org or complete this form and mail a copy of it to the CALIFORNIA JPIA 8081 Moody Street La Palma, CA 90623 or fax it to (562) 860-4992. If you have questions, call (800) 229-2343. Conference Cancellation Policy: Cancellations must be made in writing or through the website. 100% refund if cancelled by August 8, 50% refund if cancelled by August 15. No refunds after August 15. Please allow 45 days after the end of the conference to receive refunds. CALIFORNIA J P I A Attendee Registration __. _.... O..... IJAn� PLEASE PAQ47') NAn� N FIADGE _ TS'17.E CCfY%ORGAN6ATTON......... ........_...._.. ..._.... .. ............... ... ADDRESS ..__............ ... .......... ...._......_...... .. . ............. _...........__ .. ............ PHONE FAX EMAR, ADDREss Please check the appropriate boxes: Registration: Early (until July 19) Regular (July 20-Aug. 8) JPIA Member ❑ $245 ❑ $295 Non -Member ❑ $315 ❑ $365 Pre -Conference Workshop (September 11) ❑ $75 Golf Tournament (September 11) ❑ $130 Includes 18 holes golf, cart, box lunch, and prizes. Events In order to estimate the number of participants at each event, please indicate the events you plan to attend (the cost of these items is included in the registration fee): ❑ 9/ 11 Welcome Dinner ❑ 9/ 12 Breakfast ❑ 9/ 12 Lunch ❑ 9/ 12 Casino Night ❑ 9/ 13 Breakfast ' � E ;n ,L ? m "`. n�f, �•:�ilt��$tiridn rb��i . $ Spouse/Guest• • My guest will attend the following (guests may enjoy both breakfasts free of charge): ❑ $130 Golf Tournament ❑ $35 Welcome Dinner ❑ $0 9/ 12 Breakfast ❑ $28 9/ 12 Lunch ❑ $30 Casino Night ❑ $0 9/ 13 Breakfast ..__........... .............. . N ON BADGE....... .. . IQAN� PLEASE PAE4T�� c��tse/west: l egftratibn '�+�tal $ ❑ Bill Me ❑ Bill City/Organization ❑ Check Enclosed ❑ Bill Credit Card (Master Card/Visa) #: I am a Sponsor ❑ Platinum level ❑ Gold level ❑ Silver level I am a ❑ Speaker Amtrak Information: Amtrak is offering a 10% discount to conference attendees who wish to take the train. Call Amtrak at (800) 872-7245 and use reference code #X58V-939 to book your ticket. exp. Hotel Reservations: CALIFORNIA JPIA group rate (available September 11-13 only) is $179. Reservations must be made by Augu receive the discounted rate. Book dire 1 with Fess Parker's at (877) 398-5182. Ask for the group rate for CALIFORNIA JP110 6 c&h. 4 4Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: �3 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: zs ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Approval to Award a Contract for Janitorial Services PUBLIC HEARING: for City Facilities Award the contract for janitorial services for City facilities to Moore Maintenance & Janitorial Services, Inc. for one year, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract in the amount of $50,100. Adequate funds have been proposed in the 2002/2003 Fiscal Year budget to provide for the cost of janitorial services. None. The facilities to be cleaned under the proposed contract include: the Civic Center, Senior Center, Sports Complex snack bar and restrooms, Sheriff Substation, the Kidsline Trailer and Public Works restrooms and offices, and Fritz Burns Park restrooms. Attachment 1 details the level of service requested by the City. All prospective bidders participated in a walk through of the above facilities prior to submitting a proposal to the City. The current contract with Desert Janitor Company expires on June 30, 2002. The contract under consideration will be for one year with the option to extend for two additional years. As a result of soliciting firms, per the City's adopted criteria, staff received responsive bids from the following contractors: . , M. Moore Maintenance & Janitorial Services, Inc. - $50,100 Desert Janitor Company (the current provider) - $59,940 e The alternatives available to the City Council are: 1 . Award the contract for janitorial services for City facilities to Moore Maintenance & Janitorial Services, Inc. for one year in the amount of $50,100. 2. Reject all bids and direct staff to re -advertise for janitorial services; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, � Tom Hartung, Direct r of Building & Safety Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Detailed Specifications for Custodial Services 08 0 0' ATTACHMENT 1 DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS FOR CUSTODIAL SERVICES The City of La Quinta, Riverside County California, wishes to retain the services of a firm to provide custodial services for its Civic Center located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, its Senior Center located at 78-450 Avenida La Fonda, and several miscellaneous buildings. The structures consist of approximately 42,475 square feet. The City is looking to contract for five nights a week (7 nights per week at Fritz Burns Park Restrooms and Sports Complex Restrooms) janitorial service with a qualified firm. The following is an itemized list by area of cleaning activities and the frequency at which each should occur. NIGHTLY SERVIU GENERA - Offices, conference rooms, council chambers 1. All waste containers shall be emptied and contents disposed of in designated area. Return containers to original locations. 2. Liners to be used in all waste containers 3. Sweep and damp mop all hard flooring 4. Vacuum all carpeted areas 5. Dust desks, chairs, tables and other office furniture and equipment (paperwork must be cleared by City staff). 6. Clean and polish all drinking fountains 7. Spot clean to remove fingerprints from glass entry doors and glass partitions 8. Replace any burned out light bulbs (city will provide bulbs) GYM -AREA (Civic Center) 1. Sweep and damp mop flooring 2. Vacuum carpeted areas 3. Empty all waste containers and replace liners 1. Damp wipe all table tops and chair seats 2. Clean microwave inside and out 3. Outside of refrigerator to be cleaned n 8 g 4. Sweep and damp mop or vacuum all floor areas Page 25 5. Clean and disinfect all sinks and counter tops (dishes cleaned by City staff) 6. Empty trash and replace liners in containers 1. Clean and sanitize all urinals and commodes and wash basins including all chrome fittings, bright work and counter tops. 2. Clean tile behind urinals 3. Sweep floors and damp mop with germicidal cleaner 4. Empty waste containers and replace linen 5. Empty and sanitize all feminine napkin disposal units 6. Clean all mirrors 7. Restock all supplies as necessary (soap, tissue, towels, linens, seat covers, napkins, etc.) RECEIVING (Civic Center) 1. Sweep or dust mop floor 2. Empty trash containers JANITOR CLOSET (Civic Center & Senior Center) 1. Sweep or dust mop floor 2. Remove all trash to designated area 3. Maintain neat and orderly storage These items must be performed at least once a week in addition to the nightly service. Offices, conference rooms and council chambers 1. Spray and buff all the floors 2. Dust all ledges and other flat surfaces below 6 feet from floor 3. Dust all picture frames and art work 4. Remove chairs and vacuum under desks 089 V �- Page 26 1. Deep clean and polish sinks and counter tops (dishes will be cleared by City staff). 1. Dust all ledges and partitions 1. Wash sink basin 2. Mop floors 3. Restock supplies 1. Sweep and damp mop floors These items must be completed at least once a month in addition to all nightly and weekly services. GENERAL - Offices, conference rooms and council chambers 1. Clean base molding and vacuum edge of carpeted areas 2. High dust all areas 6 feet and above (contractor .must provide an approved lift to perform this service) 3. Remove fingerprints from doors and frames 4. Spot clean minor stains in carpet 5. Spot clean wall surfaces in hallways 6. Spot clean minor -stains in seats in the council chambers 1. Remove lime buildup from faucets 1. Thoroughly wash partitions and doors 2. Spot clean wall surfaces 3. Thoroughly wash all floors and detail corners Ir1r) C 6 Page 27 4. Strip and rewax floors 5. Remove lime buildup from all fixtures 6. Clean showers and remove mildew General - Offices, conference rooms, council chambers 1. Spin pad shampoo hallways and high traffic areas 2 .Strip and rewax tile floors 3. Wash and wipe trash containers 4. Wash all windows inside and out 1 . Wash and wipe trash containers 2. Strip and rewax the floors 1. Vacuum heating and air conditioning vents 1. Wash all wall surfaces 1 . Steam clean all carpeted areas n91. L"" 7 TW�v 4 XP Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 Approve Ratification of Amendment to Joint Powers Agreement of Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitors Authority RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 9 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve ratification of an amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement of the Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitors Authority (CVA) as approved by the CVA's Executive Committee on May 21, 2002. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: On May 30, 2002, the City of La Quinta received a memorandum (Attachment 1) from the Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitors Authority (CVA) regarding an amendment to the CVA's Joint Powers Agreement. The CVA's Executive Committee approved the amendment at their May 21, 2002 meeting. Per the Agreement, the amendment has to be ratified by the governing bodies of two thirds of the CVA members. Therefore, the CVA is requesting that the La Quinta City Council ratify the following amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement (the Agreement in its entirely, without the amendment, is provided as Attachment 2): Page 10, Article XV, Contract Services to read: "Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to prohibit a member organization from expending additional efforts and resources or contracting with the Authority or other entities for additional services and benefits similar to those realized from participation in this Agreement. The Convention and Visitors Authority is authorized to seek, 092 if necessary, and after careful review of available funds, specialized outside legal counsel and/or assistance depending upon circumstances and/or conditions regarding pending litigation, personnel or any other type of issue where legal assistance and/or counsel is necessary." Article XV was amended (i.e., the second sentence was added) to allow the CVA to seek outside legal counsel as needed, particularly, in the areas of personnel and pending litigation. In the past, the CVA has utilized the legal services of the presiding member city/entity. A presiding city, for example, has one of their council members serving as Chair of the Executive Committee, their city manager serving as Chair of the Technical Advisory Committee and, prior to the amendment, their city attorney serving as legal counsel. The amendment to Article XV now allows the CVA to seek and fund outside legal counsel, and relieves the presiding city/entity of the responsibility of providing legal services. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve ratification of an amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement of the Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitors Authority as approved by the CVA's Executive Committee on May 21, 2002; or 2. Do not approve ratification of an amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement of the Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitors Authority as approved by the CVA's Executive Committee on May 21, 2002; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Mark Weiss, Assistant City aanager Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Memorandum from Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitors Authority dated May 30, 2002 093 2. Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitors Authority - Joint Powers Agreement 00 MAY. 06. rl i'01 12:4FM RIEVISED TO: c I TY of LA Qu I NTA ATTACHMENT 1 1yiEM4RA,N)()UM TO: CVA TECMNIQAL ADVISORY CO1yEMITTEE JOE GUZZETTA, Chairman, City of Desert Hot Springs DAVID READY, City Of Palm Springs DON BRADLEY, City of Cathedral City GREG JOHNSON, City of Indian Wells H.AROLD SCHILLING, City of Indio SPRINGS PALM SPRING TOM GENOVESE, City of La Quinta I SERT S� DE CARLOS ORTEGA, City of Palm Desert c N v B N C I O N A N n VISITORS AUTHORITY PAT PRATT, City of Rancho Mirage MZCI-IAEL O'CONNER, Deputy County Executive Officer, County of Riverside Tb�f)crrResgrrcorrmrHn�rfar gfA4'tr ide C•-01. GATiL RUCM FROM: TF- T%MTON, Administrative Assistant DESM HOT SPRMS DATE: MA'Y 30, 2002 PAGE 1 OF l0 MMN WaTS wDio SUBJECT: JPA AGREEMENT AND BYLAW AMENDMENTS jn QURJT,1 PALM DHSM To update my earlier memorandum of May 21,,please note that t11e Bylaw AmendmentS FAIhj SPRINGS do not need City Council approval as outlined in Section 10 of the CVA Bylaws. (copy Fmcflo MMAGE attached) Followi a are the TPA Agreement Amendments requested: At the JPA Executive Committee meeting of May 21, the proposed . PA Agreement and Bylaw amendments were unanimously approved. As the JPA Agreement states in Article XVI, all amendments require a vote oft\vo-thirds of the entire membership of the Executive Committee AND subsequent ratification by the governing bodies of two-thirds of the member organizations. Therefore, we respectfully request that the following JP A REEMENT amendments be placed on your next City Council Agenda for subsequent ratification: ■ Page 10, Article .XV, Contract Services to read- "Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to prohibit a member organization from expending additional efforts and resources or contracting with the Authority or ogler entities for additional services and benefits smilar to those realized from participation in this Agreement. The Convention and Visitors Authority is authorized to seek, if necessary, and after careful review of available fluids, specialized outside legal counsel and/or assistance 69-930 Hwr 11t. SUITE 201 n depending upon circumstances and/or conditions regarding pending litigatio, RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 or any other type of issue where legal assistance and/or counsel is necessary 76o-770-9000 personnel 760-M-9001 TAX 8umG7-3167 Thank you very much. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know• www,PnlmSpring$USA. c0m WSIfWrON, D,G Please notify me of your Council's action as soon as possible. SAME OFMCE 115 Norm rAm xx s1. %= 100 ALESANDRI , VA 22314 70?r549-8026 703.519.7579= cc: Mike Fife 094 004 05-30-02 13:37 RECEIVED FROM:760 P-01 ATTACHMENT 2 14- PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS® CONVENTION AND PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS VISITORS AUTHORITY CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY Tbe,Oesed Resort Communities of Riverside County: CATHEDRAL CITY DESERT HOT SPRINGS INDIAN WELLS INDIO LA QUENTA PALM DESERT JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT AALM CHOMIRAG RANCHO MIRAGE 69-930 HWY IIt, SUITE 201 RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 760-770-9000 760-770-9001FAX 800-967-3767 www.PalmSpringsUSA.com Last Amended July 30, 2001 WASHINGTON, D.C. SALES OFFICE 115 NORTH FAIRFAX ST., SUITE 300 ALEXANDRIA,VA 22314 703-549-8026 095 703-519-7579FAX 005 v i ^ "4a�04, III C,11i011N•� ��4Y AY 1l 1W�/Si%4Y4LL+iiY AMENDMENT TO A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT (Government Code Section 6503.5 or 6503.7) Instructions: 1. Complete and mail to: Secretary of State, P.O. Box 944225, Sacramento, CA 94244-2250 (916) 653-3984 2. Include filing fee of $l.Gb. 3. Do not include attachments. Date of filing initial noticq with the Secretary of State: May 19, 1989 File number of initial notice: 963 In the Offi�`N FrR of State Of the State Of Catlfomia JUL 3 0 2001 BILL J0 , &ryo{ to (Office Use Only) Name of Joint Powers agreement: Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitors Bureau Mailing Address: 69930 Hwy, 111, Suite 201, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Complete one or more boxes below. The agreement has been amended to: ( ] Change the parties to the agreement as follows: [XX] Change the name of the administering agency or entity as follows: Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitors Authority [ ] Change the purpose of the agreement or,the powers to be exercised as follows: [ ] Change the short title of the agreement as follows: [ ] Make other changes to the agreement as follows: GfC,G9F —Signature Terri Milton, Recordin C� l` �r r � gr�,�.cr'b�arg�% �I Typed Name and Title Sec/State Form LP/SF-404A Rev. 8/95 F •5� �*Hfe of � w 11 Col 1Fopol" AMENDMENT TO A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT (Government Code Section 6S03.S or 6SO3.7) Instructions: 1. Complete and mail to: Secretary of State, P.O. Box 944225, Sacramento, CA 94244-2250 (916) 653-3984 2. Include filing fee of $5.00. 3. Do not include attachments. Date of filing initial notice with the Secretary of State: File number of initial notice: 963 May 19, 1989 FILENO. FILED In the office of the Secretary of State of the State of California �'�Lj PIES, Se ry cf State Use ,d Name of Joint Powers agreement: Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention $ Visitors Bureau Mailing Address: 69930 Hwy. 111 Suite 201 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Complete one or more boxes below. The agreement has been amended to: [ X] Change the parties to the agreement as follows: Cities of Cathedral City, Desert Hot Springs, Indian Wells Indio La Ouinta Palm Desert, Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage and that portion of Riverside County located within the..Coachella Valley [ ) Change the name of the administering agency or entity as follows: [ ] Change the purpose of the agreement or the powers to be exercised as follows: [ ] Change the short title of the agreement as follows: [XX] Make other changes to the agreement as follows: Change f rom f i scal to cal endar year of operati o J change voting privlidges of County representative and add provision for an Inactive member. Signature Terri M. Woolston Recording Secretary Typed Name and Title ' • aAm Sec/State Form LP/SF-404A Rev. 4/95 Eal or 1 S N�, Vim' � .01 Tall -arm En �•cran�`� -§PLrrfar13 of §tatz AMENDMENT TO A JOINT POWERS AGREEti1ENT (Government Code Section 6503.5 or 6503.7) Instructions: 1. Complete and mail to: Secretary of State, P.O. Box 944225, Sacramento, CA 94244-2250 (916) 324-6 778 9 Include filing fee of $5.00. Date of filing initial notice with the Secretary of State: May 19, 1989 File number of initial notice: 963 FILE NO. FILED In16efFimvfAMEncnioryof State of fhe Slab 4 GaMam+o AUG 3 1 1993 %94EU:, �etar01 fate (Office Use Only) Name of joint Powers Agency: PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU Mailing Address: 69-930 Hi ghway 111, Su i to 201, Rancho Mi rage, Cal i forn i a 92270 Complete one or more boxes below. The agreement has been amended to: Q X ] Change the parties to the agreement as follows: Deleting the City of Desert Hot Springs ( ] Change the name of the admini '1V follows: [ ] Change the purpose of the agreement or the powers to be exercised as follows: [ ] Change the short title of the agreement as follows: [ XX] Make other changes to the agreement as follows: ARTICLE I, Definitions, Pages 1-3; ARTICLE X, Designation of Treasurer and Auditor, Pages 8-10; ARTICLE XI, Contributions, page 11; ARTICLE XIII, Withdrawal o Mem er Or an'zation, Pages _. Date: August 13- 199.1 - O Terri M. Woolston, Recording Secretary Typed Name and Title 0 (� jn V ;ttttr of Talifornia Mnrrh Yang Ku .§rrrrtarB of §tatr AMENDMENT TO A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT (Government Code Section 6503.5 or 6503.7) Instructions: 1. Complete and mail to: Secretary of State, P.O. Box 704, Sacramento, CA 95812-0704 (916) 324-6778 2. Include filing fee of $5.00. 3. Do not include attachments. Date of filing initial notice with the Secretary of State: May 19, 1989 File number of initial notice: 963 FILE NO. 5 33 FILED In ti1a of*ice n7 yi ,a Socr;tc;y of slate Of tho Stain of CaMarnia AU G 2 2 i190 e, a X� �� -11 . a 1IARN r3NG EU, Secretary�,l Slate (Office Use Only) Name of Joint Powers agreement: JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT Creating the Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitors Bureau Mailing Address: The Atrium Design Center, 69-930 Highway 111, Suite 201 Rancho Mirage, California 92270 Complete one or more boxes below. The agreement has been amended to: [XX] Chan e the parties to the agreement as follows: ARTICLE III, line 23 to include: "A city that qua ifies as a member organization (ARTICLE I), has signed the Joint Powers Agreen and has made the prescribed contribution to the Bureau may become an active membE buybsetwen hra sf c o.no e f the entire membersh p Q1 th Executive Committee .an� C ��i .ihe governing, o If o a ac ive member organization. [ ] ange a name o the a minist ring ag ney or entity as o ows: [X X] Change the purpose of the agreement otIP t e exercised as follows: ARTICLE I X . Page 7line 2 to read: "Business Counci_ d of 17 private and associate members for three year staggered terms " [ ] Change the short title of the agreement as follows: [XX] Make of er change to the a reement as follows: ARTICLE XI, CONTRIBUTIONS, Page 10, 1 ine 3 to rea�: 'for the quar�er starting six 6 months prior to the current quarter of lodging..." AND line 8 to read," organizations shall be $10 000 annually or 0.55% of said sales, whichever is..." ,1 , /7 /_ Terri M. Woolston, Recording Secretary Typed Name and Title 0 !nt " Sec/State Form LP/SB-404A Rev. 2/88 87 40827 Ratr of Talifornitt fttrr4 Jinni En Oerretarg of State NOTICE OF A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT (Government Code Section 6503.5 or 6503.7) Instructions: 1. Complete and mail to: Secretary of State, P.O. Box 704, Sacramento, CA 95812-0704 (916) 324-6778 2. Include filing fee of $5.00. 3. Do not include attachments, unless otherwise specified. FILE NO. FILED In the office of the Secretary of State of the State of California MAY 19 1989 Secretary MAMi FONG EU, if State (Office Use Only) The name of the agency or entity created under the agreement and responsible for the administration of the agreement is: Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitors Bureau Mailing address: Airport Park Plaza, 255 N. El Cielo Road, Palm r= ings, CA 92262 Provide a short title of the agreement if applicable: JOINT POWERS AGREI = Creatinct the Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitors Bureau The public agencies party to the agreement are: (1) City of Catfteciral City (4) City of La Ouinta t /) city or Yam Mirage (2) City of Indian Wells (5) Cit;y of Palm Desert (3) City of Indio if more space is needed, continue on a The effective date of the agreement is: Provide a condensed statement of the agreement's purpose or the powers to be exercised: This Acareement entered into by the member organizations, as parties hereto, to jointly encourage, pr extent possible, all aspects of the hospitality, convention and tour' ,sp industry in to the benefit of the member organizations and their Signature / / INIICT-37SM E . FIFE Executive Director Typed Name and Title 10 Ser /Stnte Fn,- I P /SR-dnd Rev 7 /AR - i^ 97 PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU DESERT RESORTS T4C Y414-Zo -fa 4" JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT Cathedral City Indian Wells Indio la Quinta Palm Desert Palm Springs Rancho Mirage C O N V E N T I O N A N D V I S 1 T O R 5 B U R E A U T H E A T R I U M HW1' SUITE 2 RANG Revised July 14, 1995 RANCHO MIRAGE. CA 92270 619-770-9000 Approved • 1995 G ] 9-770-9001 FAX pp r, _•�• , 8 0 0- 9 6- R E S O R T S W A 5 H I N G T 0 N, D. C. S A L E S O F F I C E 421 RING ST.. SUITE 222 A L E X A N DR IA, VA 22314 7 0 3- 5 4 9- R 0 2 6 7 0 3- 5 4 9- 4 7 4 9 F A X 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 s 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 July 10, 1995 Amendment Proposed JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY CREATING THE PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION AND VISITORS I:�i) 7�1:ti1 Acting pursuant to Article I, Chapter 5, Division 7, Title I of the California Government Code (Section 6500 et seq.), the parties signatory to this agreement, as listed in Appendix A attached hereto, hereby join together and agree as follows: ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Active Member. A member organization as defined below. Associate Member. Associate Members shall be a non -governmental entity whose business and activities are related to the convention or tourism industry, for the purposes of this agreement, but whose place of business is not within the boundaries of a governmental agency which is eligible to become a member or an inactive member of the Bureau. Executive Committee. The governing body of the Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitors Bureau, formed pursuant to Article VIII of this Joint Powers Agreement. Calendar Year. The Calenda year for the Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitors Bureau shall commence January II of every year and end December 31 of the same year. Funding Formula. A method of computing revenues to be paid to the Bureau by member organizations based on gross hotel room sales generated, as stated in Article XI, and as illustrated in Exhibit A. The definition of a "Convention Meeting Hotel" is contained in Exhibit B. i 10 J. 012 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 . 12 13 14 is 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Hospitality Industry and Business Council. An advisory body comprised of 17 private or associate members appointed by the Executive Committee. Inactive Member. A member organization which has given notice of withdrawal pursuant to Article XIII of this agreement and thereafter is not eligible for continued representation on the I i Executive Committee. Member Organization. A city in the Coachella Valley or Riverside County Government, which has signed the Joint Powers Agreement, has made the prescribed contribution to the Bureau and has not given notice of withdrawal all references to "member" (unless otherwise modified), "active member" or "active city member" shall mean a member organization. Private Member. A private member shall be a non -governmental entity whose place of business is within the jurisdiction of an active governmental member organization and whose business and activities are directly related to the convention or tourism industry and the purposes of this agreement. Technical Advisory Committee. A committee comprised of one city manager/administrator from each member organization, with the function of advising on all matters which come before the Executive Committee. ARTICLE Il PURPOSE This Agreement is entered into the by the public member organizations, as parties hereto, to jointly encourage, promote, and to do such other things as might be necessary to enhance, to the greatest extent possible, all aspects of the hospitality, convention and tourism industry in the Coachella Valley and to attract visitors to the area from a world-wide market, all to the benefit of the member organizations and their citizens. 2 103 013 2 3 4 5 6 7 s 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ARTICLE III PARTIES TO AGREEMENT Each member organization, as a party to this Agreement, hereby agrees and contracts with each and every other member organization as parties to this Agreement, together with such other organizations as may hereafter be added as parties to this agreement, to abide by the terms of this agreement as hereinafter setforth. Each member organization also agrees that withdrawal of any party from this Agreement shall not affect this Agreement as to those member organizations then remaining. ARTICLE IV TERM This Agreement shall become effective February 1, 1989, or as soon thereafter as it is approved and executed by three or more member organizations, and shall continue to full force and effect until terminated as herein provided. ARTICLE V CREATION OF CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU In order to most effectively achieve the purposes and goals of this Agreement, there is hereby created a public entity, separate and apart from the parties hereto, to be known as the Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitors Bureau. ARTICLE VI POWERS OF THE BUREAU The Bureau shall have all of the powers common to its member organizations and is authorized, in its own name, to make and enter contracts, to employ agents and employees, to acquire, 104 3 014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 construct, manage, maintain or operate any building, works or improvements, to acquire, hold, or dispose of property, and to incur debts, liabilities, or obligations. The Bureau shall have the power to sue and be sued in its own name. The Bureau may receive and use contributions and advances from member organizations pursuant to Government Code Section 6504, including contributions or advances of personnel, equipment, or property. It may invest any money in its treasury, not required for its immediate necessities, pursuant to Government Code Section 6509.5. The Bureau may do such other things as are necessary to carry out the purposes and achieve the objectives of this Agreement. These powers shall be exercised by the Bureau pursuant to the terms hereof and as provided by law. ARTICLE VII OBLIGATIONS OF THE BUREAU The debts, liabilities, and obligations of the Bureau shall be the sole responsibility of the Bureau and shall not become the debts, liabilities, or obligations of the member organizations or any one of them except that a member organization may separately contract for, or assume responsibility for specific debts, liabilities, or obligations of the Bureau. ARTICLE VIII EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The Bureau shall be governed by an Executive Committee comprised of elected officials from each active public member organization. Each member organization shall appoint a member of its governing body as member of the Executive Committee, and a second member of its governing body as an alternate member of the Executive Committee. The County of Riverside Executive committee, Eal member of •mll of 105 4 015 1 2 3 4 s 6 7 s 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 is 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 appointing member organization. When a committee member or alternate committee member is no longer a member of the governing body of the appointing organization, membership on the Executive Committee shall automatically terminate. Any vacancy on the Executive Committee shall be promptly filled by the appointing member organization. ARTICLE IX POWERS AND DUTIES OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The Executive Committee shall exercise all the powers and conduct all the business of the Bureau, either directly or by delegation of authority as the Executive Committee deems appropriate. The Executive Committee shall adopt bylaws to provide for the organization and administration of the Bureau. The bylaws shall be adopted by a majority vote of all the members of the Executive Committee and may thereafter be amended in like manner, except as more restrictive requirements may appear in said bylaws. The Executive Committee shall approve and adopt a budget for the Bureau by November 30th of each year for the Calendar ,year beginning January 1 st of each year. The Executive Committee shall appoint a Hospitality Industry and Business Council comprised of 17 private and associate members for three year staggered terms. The Executive Committee shall be advised on all matters by a Technical Advisory Committee comprised of one city manager/administrator from each member organization. The Executive Committee shall hire a President who shall be a professional manager to organize all affairs of the Bureau. The Executive Committee may create such other committees as it deems necessary to achieve the purposes and intent of this Agreement as required by law. ARTICLE X DESIGNATION OF TREASURER AND AUDITOR I The Executive Committee shall designate a Treasurer and one or more Deputy Treasurers. The Office of Treasurer may be held by President. 106 016 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 s 9 10 11 12 13 .. 14 . 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The Treasurer shall: 11. Receive and receipt for, all money of the Bureau and place it in the treasury of the Bureau; 2. Be responsible, upon his official bond, for the safekeeping and disbursement of all Bureau money so held by him; 3. Pay, when due, out of money of the Bureau so held by him, all sums due from the Bureau, or any portion thereof; submit Warrant Registers to Auditor for review and approval prior to submittal to Executive Committee; submit to auditor payroll registers for monthly review; 4. On a monthly basis, verify and report, in wiring to the Executive Committee, the amount of money he holds for the Bureau, the amount of receipts since his last report and the amount paid out since his last report; 5. Pursuant to Government code 53646, the Treasurer shall submit monthly and annual reports to the Executive Committee. The Treasurer shall invest idle funds to conform to the provisions of Government Code 53651; 6. Develop and submit for Executive Committee approval, annually, investment policies governing the management of the Bureau's idle funds. 7. Develop and adhere to Policy and Procedures Manual as approved by Auditor and Executive Committee; The Treasurer, and such other persons who shall have charge of, handle, or have access to any property of the Bureau shall file an official bond in an amount to be determined by the Executive Committee and sufficient to secure the assets of the Bureau. At the close of each Calendar year, the Treasurer shall contract with a Certified Public Accountant or Public Accountant to make an annual audit of the accounts and records the Bureau. The minimum requirements of such audits shall be those prescribed by the State 0 107 017 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 s 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Controller for special districts under Section 26909 of the Government Code and shall conform to generally -accepted auditing standards. A report of such audit shall be filed as a public record with each member organization and with the County Auditor for the County of Riverside. Such report shall be filed within six months of the end of the Calendar year under examination. The cost of such audit shall be bome by the Bureau. All funds of the Bureau shall be strictly accounted. A member organization may request a report of all receipts and disbursements at any time. The Executive Committee shall designate appropriate officers of one of its member organizations to be the Auditor. The Auditor shall: 1. Review and recommend to Executive Committee accounting procedures and policies governing the Joint Powers Authority; 2. Review and approve all demands listed on the Warrant Registers prior to submittal to Executive Committee; Review payroll registers monthly; 3. Review all the financial reports being submitted to Executive Committee and make Executive Committee aware of any discrepancies or potential problems in the reports; 4. Review investments made by President; or Treasurer; 5. Review audit report prepared by Certified Public Accounting firm prior to finalization of report and submittal to Executive Committee; 6. Assist staff in selection of Certified Public Accounting firm; 108 7 M 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ARTICLE XI CONTRIBUTIONS Each member organization shall pay into the treasury of the Bureau, the sum of $2,500, or if it is greater, a sum determined according to a formula determined by the Executive Committee. Such formula shall be reviewed annually and adopted in accordance with Article XVI. The initial formula determined by the Executive Committee is set forth in Exhibit C. ARTICLE)(II PRIVATE MEMBERSHIP AND ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP There is hereby established a class of membership designated "Private Member". Private members shall be subject to approval of the Executive Committee which shall set the fee for such member. There is hereby established a class of membership designated "Associate Member". Any business entity that promotes visitors out of the member city jurisdiction can not be an "Associate Member". This includes lodging providers, attractions, restaurants and retail establishments. The rights, duties and obligations of Private Members and Associate Members shall be provided in the bylaws. ARTICLE XIII WITHDRAWAL OF MEMBER ORGANIZATION A member organization may withdraw from participation in this Joint Powers Agreement subject to the following conditions: 1. The effective date of withdrawal shall always be the last day of a Calendar Year; 2. Current annual contribution to the Bureau must be paid in full; 3. Annual contribution for the next following calendar year must be paid in the usual manner for such payment. If an "Active Public Member" withdraws during the 1995-1996 fiscal year- 109 $�. 019 3 4 5 6 7 s 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 14. Notice of withdrawal must be given not less than thirteen months prior to the effective date of withdrawal. For example, notice must be given prior to January 1 to effect withdrawal at the end of the next following Calendar Year. Notice given between January 1 and December 31 shall be effective at the end of the second following calendar year. 15. After giving notice of withdrawal, a withdrawing member shall not have voting privileges on the Executive Committee except for operating budget items during the next thirteen months. 6. A withdrawing member organization may again become a participating member of this Joint Powers Agreement on condition that it pay to the treasury of the Bureau an amount equal to all contributions which the member organization would have paid if it had not withdrawn from participation. Private members may remain active members as long as the government . entity is a member and during the period of withdrawal from the Joint Powers Agreement. ARTICLE XIV APPROVAL OF NEW MEMBER ORGANIZATION A new member organization must be approved by vote of two-thirds of the entire membership of the Executive Committee and subsequent ratification by the governing bodies of two-thirds of the member organizations, provided that a Resolution outlining the jurisdiction, initial contribution and continuing contribution be approved by both the applicant and two-thirds of the Executive Committee. 110 020 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 that a Resolution be approved- outlining the payment schedule for all contributions which the member oreanization would have •. • if it had not !• ! from participation- contribution -and continuina contribution- be-aDnroved'-b-NLbotbAh-e-atinliranLar)d—by a-unanimol, vote of the Executive Committee. This provision,,krill ONLY be extended to the Ci Hot SPrings for a "one -time -only" req.uest for re -admission during the 1995-1996 fi =1 outlined in Resolution No. 5 authorizing said re -admission of the City of Desert Hot SPrings, ARTICLE XV • CONTRACT SERVICES Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to prohibit a member organization from expending additional efforts and resources or contracting with the Bureau or other entities for additional services and benefits similar to those realized from participation in this Agreement. ARTICLE XVI AMENDMENTS TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT This Joint Powers Agreement may not be amended except by a vote of two-thirds of the entire membership of the Executive Committee AND subsequent ratification by the governing bodies of two-thirds of the member organizations, provided further that any amendment of the amount of member contributions, as stated in Article XI, shall require the unanimous vote of the entire active membership of the Executive Committee and subsequent ratification by the governing bodies of all active member organizations. ARTICLE XVII TERMINATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS This Agreement may-be.terminated at any time upon election to terminate by the governing ill .10 O2i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 .25 26 bodies of not less than three -fourths of the member organizations, provided, however, that this Agreement and the Bureau shall continue to exist after such termination for the purpose of disposing of all claims, distributing all assets, and performing all other acts necessary to conclude the affairs of the Bureau. Upon termination, all assets of the Bureau shall be distributed among the member organizations in proportion to their contribution during the term of this Agreement with an offset for any monies owed to the Bureau. ARTICLE XVIII FILING WITH SECRETARY OF STATE Notice of this Agreement, or any amendments to it, shall be filed with the Office of the California Secretary of State within thirty days of its effective date pursuant to Government Codes Section 6503.5. 112 022 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year 2 hereinafter specified. 3 4 CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY s 6 DATED: S �.y BY:_ 7 MAYOR s 9 ATTEST: APPROVED AS B ' R 4 10 / 11 BY: BY: t ' 12 City Clerk Ci Attorney 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 113 13 023 --120 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year hereinafter specified. June 6, 1995 by adoption of Resolution No. 95-18, Contract No. 95-16A. CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS DATED: ATTEST: BY: City Clerk BY: MP,,YOR APPROVED AS BY FORM: City Attorney 114 13 Q24 1 2 3 4. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year hereinafter specified. I CITY OF INDIAN WELLS Iel7r�_• _ .. I ATTEST: BY: / MAYOR APPROVED AS BY FORM: BY: Y: Dep . City Clerk City Attorney 115 14 025 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year hereinafter specified. CITY OF INDIO DATED: 9S ATTEST: City Clerk API MAYOR Attorney 119 15 026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year hereinafter specified. CITY OF LA QUINTA DATED. S 9 4 ATTEST: B City Clerk BY: 117 16 027 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year hereinafter specified. CITY OF PALM DESERT DATED:_ BY: MAYOR PROVED AS BY FORM: BY: City Attorney 118 J-7 028 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year hereinafter specified. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS DATED: �3 l �l BY: , MAYOR ATTEST: APPROVED AS BY FORM: BY: C— BY: G�f 4ity. Clerk City Attorney 119 -I8 029 I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year 2 hereinafter specified. 3 4 CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE 5 i 6 DATED: fz/ 1 BY: 7 MAYOR . 8 9 ATTEST: APPROVED AS BY FORM: 10 11 BY: ABY: CI 12 City Clerk City Attorney 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1'� 0 ,20 030 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ' 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year hereinafter specified. COUNTY'OF RIVERSIDE BY: Ch an, Board of Supervisors KAY CENICEROS ATTEST: GERALD A. MAC EY APPROVED AS BY FORM: CLERK of the BOARD OF PE VISORS Co+mh,of Riverside, a of ifornia B BY:- �-�- a qv County Attorney 121 20 031 0U CD U SUBMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Jr o a V FROM: Economic Development Agency SUBMITTAL DATE: December 11, 1995 SUBJECT: JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY ADOPTING THE AGREEMENT FOR THE PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU (BUREAU); APPROVAL OF THE PARTICIPATION OF THE UNINCORPORATED COUNTY AREAS WHICH ARE ENCLOSED WITHIN THE BUREAUS BOUNDARIES RECOMMENDED MOTION: That the Board of Supervisors approve and authorize the Chairman to approve the attached Joint Powers Agreement for the Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitors Bureau. JUSTIFICATION: The Palm Springs Visitors and Convention Bureau (Bureau) was created to jointly encourage and promote all aspects of the hospitality, convention and tourism industry in the Coachella Valley and to attract visitors to the area from a world-wide market, all to the benefit of the member organizations and their citizens. As proposed, portions of the County and all member cities located in the Coachella Valley would be represented in all of the Bureau's communication efforts, including press releases, printed promotional materials, advertising and their extensive work with travel journalists. The incorporated city of Coachella, which is not a dues paying member of the Bureau, would not be represented by the Bureau. cont. Bradley J. Huds E ecutive Director FINANCIAL DATA: CURRENT YEAR COST $ 31,500 ANNUAL COST $ 31.500 JURCE COUNTY COST $ 0 IN CURRENT YEAR BUDGET: YES X NO_ BUDGET ADJUSTMENT: YES NO X FOR FY:PANION ITEM ON BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA: YES _ NO X OF FUNDS: RDA Administration RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE. -11 m Admini On motion Wilson and duly above matter is Ayes: Noes: Absent:" Date: Xc. Prev. Agn. ref. . N/A MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS of Supervisor Ceniceros, seconded by Supervisor carried by unanimous vote, IT WAS ORDERED that the approved as recommended. Buster, Tavaolione, Ceniceros, None None December 19, 1995 EDA, Co.Co., Auditor Dist. -4- Wilson and Mulle Gerald A. Malone le the r By De u AGENDA NO. PC\/f`.RAr:T F11 Palm Springs Convention Bureau December 11, 1995 Page 2 The Coachella Valley portion of the County unincorporated area would also be represented in both the Bureau's domestic and international efforts in attracting convention business, group tourism business and individual visitors. The two -tiered funding formula for each city/county of the Bureau is based upon a percentage of gross hotel sales in each member city/county with an annual minimum investment of $30,000 which is adjusted annually at a rate of 5% per year. The County payment is equivalent to the minimum annual investment. Redevelopment Agency expenditures are justified because the Agency has benefited from businesses, including two hotels within the redevelopment project area boundaries, that benefit from tourism. ,Also, the Bureau assists greatly :in attracting economic development and redevelopment activity to the project areas. See attachment A for the geographical boundaries of areas which the Bureau would represent. RZ/TG/msh Attachment 123 .033 PSVCBAGT.F11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 25 1 26 1 1989-1990 PROPOSED FUNDING FORMULA CALENDAR 1989 Projected Fiscal Year 1989-1990 CITY Gross Sales X .55% Desert Hot Springs Not a member at this time Cathedral City $10,242,000 $56,331 Indian Wells 15,214,182 83,678 Indio 3,910,000 21,505 La Quinta 15,788,909 86,839 Palm Desert 59,403,090 326,717 Palm Springs 70,193,455 386,064 Rancho Mirage 27,598,000 151,789 TOTAL $202,349,636 $1,112,923 Note: Projection from City Finance Departments Im:il:��i1 21 124 034 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 1 24 25 26 1990-1991 PROPOSED FUNDING FORMULA CALENDAR 1990 Projected Fiscal Year 1990-1991 CITY Gross Sales X .6% Desert Hot Springs $4,625,000 $27,750 (Desert Hot Springs joined 7/6/90) Cathedral City 10,555,556 63,333 Indian Wells 19,195,514 115,173 Indio 5,900,000 35,400 La Quinta 21,000,000 126,000 Palm Desert 46,250,000 277,500 Palm Springs 74,444,444 446,667 Rancho Mirage 27,777,778 166,667 TOTAL $209,748,292 Note: Projection from City Finance Departments $1,258,490 F .q•11: 22 125 03 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 1991-1992 PROPOSED FUNDING FORMULA CALENDAR 1991 Projected Fiscal Year 1991-1992 CITY Gross Sales X .6% Desert Hot Springs $3,439,000 $20,634 Cathedral City 9,895,000 59,370 Indian Wells 29,666,667 178,000 Indio 5,500,000 33,000 La Quinta 22,166,667 133,000 Palm Desert 52,000,000 312,000 Palm Springs 87,000,000 522,000 Rancho Mirage 27,777,833 166,667 TOTAL $237,445,167 Note: Projection from City Finance Departments $1,424,671 EXHIBIT A-2 23 126 036 1 2 3 4 610 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1992-1993 PROPOSED FUNDING FORMULA Calendar 1992 Projected FY 1992-93 FY 1992-93 CITY Gross Sales X .6% X 1.4% TOTAL Desert Hot Springs $3,687,926 $22,128 -0- $22,128 Cathedral City 10,998,141 31,075 80,066 111,141 Indian Wells 28,050,000 -0- 392,700 392,700 Indio 6,330,740 37,984 -0- 37,984 La Quinta 19,337,845 -0- 270,730 270,730 Palm Desert 53,264,338 66,560 590,394 656,954 Palm Springs 72,062,921 195,738 552,158 747,896 Rancho Mirage 32,000,000 26,880 385,280 412,160 TOTAL $225,631,911 $380,365 $2,271,328 $2,651,693 Note: Sources: City Finance Departments 1991 Year-end Gross Sales; City of Indian Wells Projection - Down Trend City of Rancho Mirage - Westin Mission Hills vil 127 037 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1993-1994 PROPOSED FUNDING FORMULA Fiscal Year Actual FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 CITY Gross Sales X .6% X 1.4% TOTAL Desert Hot Springs Inactive member Cathedral City $9,185,163 $26,292 $67,244 $93,536 Indian Wells 29,352,553 3,911 401,810 405,721 Indio 5,437,041 32,622 -0- 32,622 La Quinta 20,404,525 11,502 258,826 270,328 Palm Desert 53,128,056 60,896 601,701 662,597 Palm Springs 68,964,193 170,366 567,978 738,344 Rancho Mirage 37,454,580 10,385 500,133 510,518 TOTAL $223,926,111 $315,974 $2,397,692 $2,713,666 Note: Sources: City Finance Departments EXHIBIT A-4 25 128 03g 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 1994-1995 PROPOSED FUNDING FORMULA Fiscal Year Actual FY 1994-95 FY 1994-95 CITY Gross Sales X .6% X 1.4% TOTAL Desert Hot Springs Inactive member Cathedral City $9,500,000 $25,200 $74,200 $99,400 Indian Wells 27,777,778 3,333 381,111 384,444 Indio 5,250,000 31,500 -0- 31,500 La Quinta 19,482,273 10,830 247,482 258,312 Palm Desert 48,042,432 60,480 531,474 591,954 Palm Springs 68,100,439 191,700 506,106 697,806 Rancho 1V irage 36,000,000 9,072 482,832 491,904 TOTAL $214,152,921 Note: Sources: City Finance Departments $332,115 $2,223,205 $2,555,320 EXHIBIT A-5 1, P-.9 26 039 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 1995-1996 PROPOSED FUNDING FORMULA Fiscal Year Projected FY 1995-96 FY 1995-96 CITY Gross Sales X .6% X 1.4% TOTAL Cathedral City $9,300,000 $25,800 $70,000 $95,800 Desert Hot Springs 4,950,833 29,705 -0- 29,705 (Re joined the Bureau 7/l/95) Indian Wells 30,810,786 3,243 423,784 427,027 Indio 5,410,000 32,460 -0- 32,460 La Quinta 21,366,357 12,180 270,709 282,889 Palm Desert 50,555,571 60,000 567,778 627,778 Palm Springs 76,444,429 192,000 622,222 814,222 Rancho Mirage 37,166,667 10,000 497,000 507,000 TOTAL $236,004,643 Riverside County (annual contribution) Note: Sources: City Finance Departments $365,388 $2,451,493 $2,816,881 -0- -0- 31,500 TOTAL $2,848,381 11: 27 040 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 1 21 22 23 24 25 1995 ACTUAL FUNDING FORMULA Actual 1995 1995 CITY Gross Sales X .6% X 1.4% TOTAL Cathedral City $8,480,124 $19,027 $74,325 $93,352 Desert Hot Springs 2,158,960 12,954 12,954 Indian Wells 33,905,975 4,569 464,023 468,592 Indio 6,345,485 38,073 38,073 La Quints 23,270,753 13,135 295,143 308,277 Palm Desert 52,750,567 80,946 549,634 630,580 Palm Springs 74,792,529 178,270 631,131 809,402 Rancho Mirage 40,212,860 9,897 539,887 549,784 TOTAL $205,350,612 Riverside County (annual contribution) Note: Sources: City Finance Departments $356,871 $2,554,143 $2,911,014 -0- -0- 31,500 TOTAL $2,942,514 26 131 28 04.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 25 26 1996 ACTUAL FUNDING FORMULA Actual 1996 1996 CITY Gross Sales X .6% X 1.4% TOTAL Cathedral City $8,038,544 $19,754 $66,448 $86,202 Desert Hot Springs 5,117,831 30,707 30,707 Indian Wells 37,189,611 4,696 509,697 514,393 Indio 6,349,063 38,094 38,094 La Quinta 25,998,636 15,625 327,522 343,147 Palm Desert 56,188,100 85,750 586,550 672,300 Palm Springs 80,570,513 205,050 649,538 854,588 Rancho Mirage 43,740,480 10,619 587,589 598,208 TOTAL $263,192,778 Riverside County (annual contribution) Note: Sources: City Finance Departments $410,295 $2,727,344 $3,137,639 -0- -0- 31,500 TOTAL $3,169,139 I j,j 29042 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1997 FUNDING FORMULA Actual Gross 1997 1997 CITY Hotel Sales X .6% X 1.4% TOTAL Cathedral City $8,106,256 $21,778 $62,672 $84,450 Desert Hot Springs $5,181,743 $31,090 0 $31,090 Indian Wells $39,160,033 $5,255 $535,980 $541,235 Indio $6,750,742 $40,504 0 $40,504 La Quinta $28,776,060 $17,937 $361,013 $378,950 Palm Desert $60,082,623 $98,834 $610,543 $709,377 Palm Springs $90,436,119 $228,488 $732,967 $961,455 Rancho Mirage $46,479,736 $11,623 $623,597 $635,220 TOTAL $284,973,312 Riverside County Annual Contribution Note Sources: City Finance Departments $455,509 $2,926,772 TOTAL $3,382,281 $33,000 $3,415,281 30 041 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 1 24 25 26 1998 FUNDING FORMULA Actual Gross 1998 1998 CITY Hotel Sales X .6% X 1.4% TOTAL Cathedral City $9,665,707 $24,037 $79,233 $103,270 Desert Hot Springs $6,263,382 $31,088 $15,149 $46,237 Indian Wells $44,368,886 $4,096 $611,606 $615,702 Indio $7,428,589 $44,572 0 $44,572 La Quinta $30,850,080 $20,916 $383,097 $404,013 Palm Desert $69,507,942 $113,712 $707,784 $821,496 Palm Springs $96,461,293 $249,076 $769,280 $1,018,356 Rancho Mirage $48,505,884 $11,432 $652,408 $663,840 TOTAL $313,051,763 $498,929 $3,218,557 $3,717,486 Riverside County Annual Contribution $34,729 TOTAL $3,752,215 Note: Sources: City Finance Departments EXHIBIT A-10 134 3'044 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1999 FUNDING FORMULA Actual Gross 1999 1999 CITY Hotel Sales X .6% X 1.4% TOTAL Cathedral City $11,398,820 $26,852 $96,929 $123,781 Desert Hot Springs 7,216,613 31,968 26,440 58,408 Indian Wells 46,815,903 1,578 651,741 653,319 Indio 8,802,462 52,815 -0- 52,815 La Quinta 33,843,166 22,453 421,414 443,867 Palm Desert 84,470,536 149,718 833,245 982,963 Palm Springs 107,415,950 281,640 846,662 1,128,303 Rancho Mirage 50,795,509 12,914 681,004 693,918 TOTAL $350,758,958 $579,939 $3,557,435 $4,137,374 Riverside County Annual Contribution $36,465 TOTAL $4,173,839 Note Source: City Finance Departments EXHIBIT A -I I 32 -135 UN, 3. 2002 11:49AM NO.096 F. 2 A B CD E 4 2000 5 FUNDING FORMULA 6 7 IcityHotel Actual Gross 2000 $ Sales x .6% 9 10 Cathedral City $10,744,357 $25,059 11 12 Desert Hot Springs 8,055,190 35,318 13 14 Indian Wells 47,719,310 1,627 15 16 India 9,575,833 57,455 17 18 La Quints 39,485,905 26,456 19 20 Palm Desert 81,315,714 133,860 21 22 Palm Springs 114,261,929 296,862 23 24 Rancho Mirage 54,025,119 15,764 25 26 TOTAL $365,183,357 $592,401 27 28 _ Riverside County Annual Contribution Note Source- City Finance Departments 2000 x 1.4% TOTAL. $91,950 $117.009 30.364 $66,682 664,274 $665,901 $57,465 491,072 $+517,528 826,080 $959,940 906,989 $1,203,851 719,569 $735,333 $3,730,298 $4,322,699 $38,288 Exhibit A-11 139 045 06-03-02 12:38 RECEIVED FROM:760 JUN, 3.2002 11:49AM NO. J9E r. A B C D E 1 2001 FUNDING FORMULA city Actual Gross Hotel Sales 2001 x _6% 2001 x 1.4% TOTAL Cathedral City $10,959,D99 $30,412 $82,466 $112,878 Desert Hot Springs 8,353,548 35,804 33,407 $69,211 Indian Wells 42,054,342 1,416 686,466 $586,880 Indio 9,584,977 57,510 $57,510 La Quinta 37,049,684 24,192 462,248 $486,440 Palm Desert 79,878,327 131,193 812,180 $943,373 Palm Springs 108,735,173 288,350 849,476 $1,137,826 Rancho Mirage 52,613,806 19,196 691,802 $710,998 TOTAL $349,229,456 $688,072 $3,517,044 $4,105,116 Riverside County Annual Contribution $40,202 TOTAL $4,145,318 Note Source: City Finance Departments ibit A-12 137 04(; 96-63-02 12:38 RECEIVED FROM:760 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 FAO 24 25 26 1 DEFINITIONS "Convention Meeting Hotel". A Convention Meeting Hotel as defined in this agreement, shall have the same meaning as "Group Meeting Hotel' to wit": A hotel meeting the following criteria: A) A minimum of 125 rooms, B) Meeting space for 125 people, and C) Has personnel specifically employed, other than the general manager or director, whose primary job responsibility is group sales. Provided that a member city, for good cause, may exclude a hotel from or include a hotel in the category of Convention Meeting Hotel upon a showing that such hotel does or does not receive services from the Bureau. Footnote: Provided that any changes to the foregoing Exhibit conform with Article XVI of the JPA Agreement. 13a 33 f)47 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 CONTRIBUTIONS The formula shall be equal to six -tenths of one percent (.6%) of all taxable gross hotel room rentals and an amount equal to eight tenths of one percent (.8%) of the taxable gross hotel room rentals of Convention Meeting Hotels; provided, that if a member city prior to June 1, 1993, shall give notice of withdrawal from membership, that city shall pay during the 1993-1994 fiscal year a contribution equal to six tenths of one percent (.6%) of all taxable gross hotel room rentals. Footnote: Provided that any changes to the foregoing Exhibit conform with Article XVI of the JPA Agreement. 10"42,110,310 34 048 I;9 1 11I jt'•t a; • W �j �, w � oU '� J= "�oi.r �I�tI� j�i�':lt - • rlrlilt ! Y1 0 o R c it Z;�,Vlo LLIO ec ,; o\+,T •j inn I 7j] l d U Q-pp to •a • ti ! Ln LLI as Y a I 1 a /• f' le %V1 99all --j1 < ��s 2 : 4 ce • aV s TMR S i 1� .�•.Au' i.t � i � C - wo- r if � DOWN 81 uJ �'C z 0 f: r w Ae 30 }}54 31 w 3v ~• rCl' N r� ��C • i i• o MOf1YYtN s W O °Y3%Pam `+: Y:4v°,; CU Z} n I y°F da S g9 t Vim• . oYo=- i ' < w Y �• � _ � ; \may „ = e= `�• o .� = p7T°7• o G 7/ a'r v TAP •,. �� O_}i; "s ze�3� �+�1i.SI c o m.�°° .. 'i6 ` �E Y S d 3 '_ ,`-J �'�P\� r 'ti�• �. i`Q 1•ir M '•A�.' \` r`Er J Ar a7Y71MOq {i A MM -J •'�Q-. '. 5y .I g -a all Jill ce ~ars3 p Ya So ? �3 L ' 1-4E�Q •Ar Nraw N... �. J se _ � -•:.. Z � �; < cpo4 s_ o•dc _ • Zv N ri" - > Z r ti � g..: n W'`�s a ° •a � � � ,` •i � � i o: � tl C9 .�. r � s • h. O •� .a+Lt�. Ems. - V _ • �,<4Z,i• :. �, F �• .OJ : �t e raj +..a�•t;C�-..T.n•7,'�,.:.: 2 c .j�i�. - •' .• ✓�aa.. •/ � � 't!. :: :f .t Zy Y � ��i � •.^i t. a 'oC. �XY : i^. �? :i• { .",�: �•�.�Qp~�� Y+-J� .a_ �- 9= i _•aTi'y: � �_Y� '�� {Y•�:: - ~i I.- �Z• .t .�.L.` g!. tl; dL !Cr �� _ C� I•:_�. o ,_-r✓.�ZT �. . !O � �":>Z �OJa. .� �"�"' � j ��,__;�+`r.rr�r..5' N� ..�� l`.:t�"`,�'•'i ,.•;,,� � s `� ;._.rZ�� ~� ''~ i �i�C'._+,�+'vl: y �.Vd:=.'ur7Au+ _r'NL;'r%" �.� <� y�a.a;Z•�•. ��- CA 1u%f� a- �}.y to • W • n • Tiht 4 XP Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: AU Acceptance of a Fiscal Year 2002 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) Award in the Amount of $24,243 from the Bureau of Justice Assistance RECOMMENDATION: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Accept a Fiscal Year 2002 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) in the amount of $24,243 from the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: In Federal Fiscal Year 2002, the City of La Quinta is eligible to receive LLEBG funds in the amount of $24,243. The City is required to provide matching funds in the amount of $2,694. These matching funds would be made available from Special Enforcement Funds (Account #101-301-609-575). CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) has made law enforcement funds available for Federal Fiscal Year 2002 through their Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) program. The Department of Justice has developed and initiated an electronic process by which grant applicants use online services to process every component of their LLEBG application. Staff will submit an LLEBG FY 2002 online application requesting receipt of the City's eligible grant award ($24,243). Once the application has been submitted, the Department of Justice will review the application and notify the City of its approval in approximately one month. 14t In accordance with the grant application procedures, the next steps include accepting the funds (via the online process) and conducting a Public Hearing in conjunction with a meeting of the LLEBG Advisory Board. As you may recall, the Advisory Board must consist of representatives from law enforcement, the court system, the school system, and nonprofit organizations involved in crime or drug prevention. Last year, the Advisory Board included Dave Downing, Riverside County Supervising Deputy District Attorney; Lt. Glen Martin, Riverside County Sheriff's Department; Mike Bergman, Head of Security for Desert Sands Unified School District; Candace Collins, Riverside County Probation Department; and Sgt. Greg Ammons, Sheriff's Department Volunteers for Increased Public Safety. It is anticipated that the Advisory Board will consist of the same members, with the exception of Lt. Martin, who recently retired. Staff will contact the Sheriff's Department to request a replacement for Lt. Martin. Once the Advisory Board has met and reviewed the LLEBG application, the City can apply for a "draw -down" of the funds. The draw -down process includes identifying how the funds will be used, outlining a budget, and finally, acquiring the funds. During the draw -down process, staff intends to specify that the funds will be used for overtime hours and special enforcement activities. The City will have two years from the allocation date to spend the funds. Staff intends to accept the LLEBG funds and complete the online application process upon approval by the City Council. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Accept a Fiscal Year 2002 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) in the amount of $24,243 from the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance; or 2. Do not accept a Fiscal Year 2002 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) in the amount of $24,243 from the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, 1 i g__. _Q Debbie Powell, Management Analyst 14' Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 Denial of Claim for Damages Filed by The Gas Company - Date of Loss: October 26, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: A STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Deny the Claim for Damages filed by The Gas Company, with a reported date of loss of October 26, 2001. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The total amount of the claim was $1,206.43. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: A claim was filed by The Gas Company, with a reported date of loss of October 26, 2001 (Attachment 1). It was forwarded to Carl Warren & Co., the City's claims administrator. Carl Warren & Co. recommended that the City Council deny the claim (Attachment 2). Correspondence was sent to The Gas Company on June 6, 2002, by Carl Warren & Co. outlining their recommendation to the City (Attachment 3). FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 2. Deny the Claim for Damages filed by The Gas Company, with a reported date of loss of October 26, 2001; or Accept the claim, or some portion thereof; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. 144 Respectfully submitted, Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager ,Approved for submissio by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. The Gas Company Claim for Damages 2. Letter from Carl Warren & Co. 3. Letter from Carl Warren & Co. to The Gas Company 145 LI 1 The Gas Company- A 'Sempra Energy company -CE ffTPTRD MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED City of La Quinta Attn: City Clerk 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 90232 WHEN DID DAMAGE OCCUR? October 26, 2001 WHERE DID DAMAGE OCCUR? ATTACHMENT 1 RECEIVED ?i + r` F 3: 34 April 22, 2002 CiT ,' ��' LA i�UIF,TA CITY ,_r 'S OFFICE 51600 Avenida Mendoza, La Quinta REFER ANSWER TO: Hilda Rubalcava OUR FILE NUMBER: 117135 HOW DID DAMAGE OCCUR? Contractor Jones Brothers damaged 2-inch gas main while installing water service for City of La Quinta. WHAT PARTICULAR ACT OR OMISSION ON THE PART OF COUNTY/CITY OFFICERS OR EMPLOYEES CAUSED THE DAMAGE? Failure to use precaution around existing underground substructures and failure to report damage to Southern California Gas Company. WHAT DAMAGE DO YOU CLAIM RESULTED? Labor and materials from Company storeroom to repair a curb meter box. WHAT AMOUNT DO YOU CLAIM ON ACCOUNT OF EACH ITEM OF DAMAGE? $1,206.43 (invoice attached) OTHER DETAILS? (Names and Addresses of Witnesses, etc.) Claims ssociate Date Signed Telephone (213) 244-5123 SIGN, DATE & RETURN ONE COPY OF THIS FORM IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE FOR OUR FILE. Received & Acknowledged by: Signature: Date Received/Signed: 146 04 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY CLAIMS RECEIVABLE INVOICE ***DUE UPON RECEIPT*** I Date: 02/11/2002 1 AMOUNT: $1,206.43 1 Claim No: 117135 TO: JONES BROS. CONSTRUCTION 85989 AVE. 52 COACHELLA, CA 92236- FROM: Southern California Gas Company CLAIMS RECEIVABLE - ML 711D P.O. Box 513249 Los Angeles, CA 90051-3249 EV116310 Credit Account No: 1106041 (143.005) Credit Cost Center: 2200-0431 Credit Internal Order No: F68870022200 DO NOT PAY THIS INVOICE WITH 6A5 BILL PLEASE DETACH TOP PORTION AND FORWARD WITH CHECK IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE Code Description # Units Unit Price Extended Price LBR0699 Straight Time Labor 16.5 $69.03 $1,139.00 0400219 2IPS 6 1.3709 $ 8.23 0525334 CPLG MET -FIT PPLS IPS 2 2 29.6000 $ 59.20 STRGE STORAGE COSTS 1 0.0000 $ 0.00 TOTAL DUE $1, 206.43 Our facilities were damaged by your operations of: 51600 AVENIDA MENDOZA, LA QUINTA, CA on 10/26/2001. This damage resulted from violation of one or more sections of California Government Code Section 4216. For more information on the Government Code go to www.leginfoxa.gov/ or call Underground Service Alert (USA) at 1,800,227.2600. Operator of Equipment: Type of Equipment: Work being performed: Facility Damaged: CONTRACTOR/EMP BACKHOE/TRENCHER Water Related Main If you wish to refer this to your insurance carrier, please furnish us with their name, address, and your policy number. If you have any questions, please contact: Hilda Rubalcova at (213) 244-5123. If you write or call about this invoice, please refer to claim number: 117135. cc: City of La Quinta 147 Southern California Gas Company a Sempra Energy Company ATTACHMENT 2 LA I' May 24, 2002 ol- � .17 TO: The City of La Quinta ATTENTION: John Ruiz, Personnel Risk Manager RE: Claim The Gas Company v. City of La Quinta D/Event 10/26/01 Our File S 133811 DBK Dear John: Please provide the following information for completion of our file. 1) Provide the contractor information, if involved in the project. 2) Please also provide a copy of the certificate of insurance for the contractor. 3) Also a copy of the rejection sent to the claimant by the City. Thank you for your help in with this matter. Very truly yours, CARL WARREN & COMPANY 64�/C-j e Deborah Been CARL WARREN & CO. 148 CLAIMS MANAGEMENT•CLAIMS ADJUSTERS 750 The City Drive • Ste 400 • Orange, CA 92868 Mail: P.O. Box 25180 • Santa Ana, Ca 92799-5180 Phone: (714) 740-7999 Ext. 119 • (800) 572-6900 • Fax: (714) 740-7992 0013 GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY PRELIMINARY REPORT TO: Carl Warre ompany DATE: 5/24/2002 750 The ' Drive, Suite 400 CLAIMANT: The Gas Company range, CA 92868 FILE NO: S 133811 DBK D/EVENT: 10/26/01 FILING DATE: 04/29/02 SIX MOS.: No PRINCIPAL/CITY: CJPIA/City of La Quinta. RECOMMENDED ACTION ON CLAIM: Send the claim reject to the claimant. FACTS: The claimant alleges a contractor working for the City damaged their facility. We will secure contractor information from the City and handle accordingly. POSSIBLE CO-DEFENDANTS: Jones Brothers (?) to be confirmed. EVALUATION: Doubtful liability. We review the information from the City and handle accordingly, tendering to the proper contractor. RESERVES TYPE OF CLAIM AMOUNT 1. The Gas Company LPD $1300.00 COMMENT/WORK TO BE COMPLETED: Diary for additional information from the City. Our further report will follow shortly. Very truly yours, CARL WARREN & COMPANY Deborah Been cc: City of La Quinta, Attn. John Ruiz cc: CJPIA - Attn.: Executive Director CARL WARREN & CO. 14 CLAIMS MANAGEMENT•CLAIMS ADJUSTERS O O 750 The City Drive . Ste 400 . Orange, CA 92868 Mail: P.O. Box 25180 • Santa Ana, Ca 92799-5180 Phone: (714) 740-7999 • (800) 572-6900 • Fax: (714) 740-7992 n6,07,'2[JQ2 12:42 FAX 714 740 7992 CARL WARREN CO. A�J ' j k� t f e Gras Co any 0. BO '60980 s geles, CA 90060-0980 June 6, 2002 RE: 151incipal CJPIA. Member City La Quinta Claimant : The Gras Company D/Incident 10/26/01 your File 117135 Our File S 133811 DBK ATTACHMENT 3 As claim administrators for the self -insured City of La Quinta, we have made a careful examination of the circumstances surrounding the captioned occurrence and feel we have enough evidence to mare a decision. on your claim. After evaluating the facts, �z e have e reached the conclusion that our principal is not responsible for this occurrence. 'Ve are sorry we are unable to recommend settlement of your claim to our principal. Our investigation reveals that the contractor working in the area was Tones Bros. @ 85989 Avenue 52, Coachella, CA 92236 Phn: 760-347-2291. We have sent a copy of your claim to them and are, requesting they contact you with their findings. Tkris letter does not. affect the notice that will be sent to you by the City of La Quinta regarding disposition of your claim. - Very truly yours, CARL WAPdREN & CO. Deborah Been ZZ City of La Quinta, John Ruiz cc. C TPIA, Executive Director CARL WARREN & CO. CLAIMS MANAGEMENT•CLAIMS ADJUSTERS 750 The City Drive . Suite 400 • Orange, CA 92868 1.5n Mail: p.p, Box 251 go - Santa Ana, Ca 92799-51 B0 Phone, (714) 740-7999• (600) 572-69o0. Fax: (714) 740-9412 C(DPY Ly bn ••T nnQ 06-07-02 12:38 RECEIVED FROM:714 740 7992 P•01 061107 2002 12:49 FAX 714 740 7992CARL WARREN CO. � 00V ZN June 6, 2002 Jones Bros. 83989 Ave tie 52 Coachell , CA. 92236 RE: Principal CJPIA. Member City = La Quinta D/Event 10/26/01 Claimant The CT35 Company Our rile S 133811 DBY We are claims adnvrlistrators for the self -insured City of La Quinta• Attacbed is a. copy of a claim. received by the city for your review. Since the City of La Quinta contracted with you, we a1e tendering this claim over to you for your investigation and b.andling. Please contact the claimant directly with your findings - Please confirm receipt of this claim by signing the acknowledgement block below and returning it to the Undersigned. Very Truly Yours, CARL WARREN & CO - Deborah Been ACKNOWLEDGED: DATED: Enc_ Copy of. Claim cc: - City of 1,a Quinta CJP1A CARL WN & CO. CLAIMS MANAGEMENT•CLAIMS ADJUSTERS ? ) 750 The City Drive • Ste 400 a Orange, CA 92868 Mai(: P.O. Box 25150 • Santa Ana, Ca 92799-5180 Phone: (714) 740-7999 • (800) 572-6900 • Fax: (714) 740-9412 COPY tj r ^ 06-07-02 12:38 RECEIVED FROM:714 740 7992 P.02 �a�T�•c U � 5 G� OF f9ty AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: June 18, 2002 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: CONSENT CALENDAR: ld— ATM TITLEQpproval to Award a Contract to Construct STUDY SESSION: the Washington Street Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements, Project No. 2001-02 PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDATION: Award a contract in the amount of $689,684 to Matich Corporation to construct the Washington Street Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements, Project No. 2001-02. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The following represents the project's approved funding and funding sources: General Fund: Gas Tax: Infrastructure Funds: RDA Project Area No. 1 Funds: Total Funding Available: Less Prior Expenditures: Amount Available: $32,666.00 $72,265.82 $561,068.18 $1, 200, 000.00 $1,866,000.00 ($74,933.32) $1,791,066.68 Considering the construction award amount of $689,684, the following represents the recommended project construction budget: Construction: Insp/Test/Survey: Administration: Professional: Contingency: Total: $689,684.00 $53,450.51 $34,484.20 $17,242.10 $79,486.08 $874,346.89 15? T:\PWDEPT\COUNCiL\2002\020618f.wpd As illustrated, adequate funding is available to support staff's recommendation. In addition, the remaining funding in the amount of $916,719.79 is available for the Eisenhower Drive pavement rehabilitation, median island and median island landscape improvements. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: This project is partially funded with RDA Project Area No. 1 funds and must be bid utilizing prevailing wage requirements. Therefore, there are no charter city implications. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: During the winter season 2000/2001, the City experienced a number of heavy rain events. During this time, areas of Washington Street between Avenue 48 and Highway 1 1 1 experienced road failures. The highest concentration of failures appeared between Avenue 48 and Simon Drive and varied from sinking pavement and alligator cracking to pavement potholes and "pop -outs." Eisenhower Drive has also experienced accelerated failure due to weather, age, and increased traffic. Due to the accelerated failures, the City Manager declared the pavement reconstruction an emergency. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 3.32 D, "The City Manager may authorize the solicitation, selection, award, and execution of service contracts by the most expeditious method where time is of the essence to prevent an emergency lack of critically needed services. If the contract is for major services, it shall be submitted for ratification at the next regular City Council Meeting." On April 17, 2001, the City Council ratified the City Manager's decision in declaring the Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive pavement failure an emergency situation and authorized the Public Works Department to utilize the most expedient method to select a qualified Professional Consultant to analyze the cause of the failure and design the permanent reconstruction measures. The City Council also approved a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) in an amount not to exceed $66,000 with the firm Harris & Associates, to prepare the PS&E for the reconstruction of the failed areas on Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive and the rehabilitation of the finished surface of Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive with a rubberized asphalt overlay. The project limits are as follows: Washington Street from approximately 1,700 feet north of Avenue 50 to Simon Drive. Eisenhower Drive from Washington Street to Coachella Drive. On April 16, 2002, the City Council appropriated $600,000 from City Infrastructure Funds, approved a Resolution of the City Council making certain findings pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a); approved the plans, specifications and .151 engineer's estimate (PS&E) and authorized staff to advertise for bid the Washington TAPWDEPT\C0UNCIL\2002\02061Sf.wpd 002 Street Pavement Reconstruction Improvements; and authorized staff to modify the proposed scope of work for the Eisenhower Drive rehabilitation improvements to include median islands and median island landscape improvements. On May 31, 2002 sealed bids were received for the construction of this project. The following table illustrates the results of the bids received (a detailed bid comparison summary is provided as Attachment 1). Engineer's Estimate: Matich Corporation: E.L. Yeager: Granite Construction: $788,555.00 $689,684.00 $ 742, 719.00 $769,769.00 As indicated, Matich Corporation submitted the lowest responsive bid for the Washington Street Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements. Assuming the City Council awards the project for construction on June 18, 2002, the following project schedule is anticipated: Approval to Award Construction Construction Period Accept Improvements FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES June 18, 2002 July 2002 - September 2002 October 2002 The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Award a contract in the amount of $689,684 to Matich Corporation to construct the Washington Street Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements, Project No. 2001- 02; or 2. Do not award a contract in the amount of $689,684 to Matich Corporation to construct the Washington Street Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements, Project No. 2001-02; or, 150 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020618f.wpd 003 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. RespectfL fts . Stephenson, P.E. n Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Bid Comparison Summary 155 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020618f.wpd 004 q .o CO O 0 ., O O N O z d 'O r* E O 3 v 00 CD Wn OOCD 00 OON q as CD CD tn N h O h vi O O O 110 O O\ 0 0 N e+i r- It h O (0 M 00 d' O l CD DD CD N N 6R .-+ 65 �O C y 6A 6R 6H 6A vi 69 69 � en wq 6i3 69 EA U o 0 :+ u oe W O L Von 0 0 0 O O h C C O O 0 0 O w 0 d' O CD to �--� V'1 v1 enVl h V1 O O O O O O 6r9 V1 65 6A V'f 69 In 6R N M69 N I� %Z) O N O O q r- ono � 0 69 WC "a 69 6'i 6R 6R 0 0 0 O ON 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl O O O\ O� O O � N Vl O N O N O ll: O O Q ' CD CD l- 00 wl ON c1 = fV � en6R �' d' 00 6A d' Q% 6R 69 6R .-• le 65 6A 6R 65 69 _O en 65 t- L 69 d � in W d O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O a0+ 0 0 0 0 O _ O d' [� 0 0 0 0 O h 6R V7 69 d' kn � 0 0 O O O y vY O O vi 69 696Req r- 6�96N9 O 9 OM "' VI h W F7'q 69 6A 65 O C O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O O N 00 [� M O a0 00 0 0 O �D O "O 00 O, h N � O n Os d• �o •• O\ en 6A 65 69 69 6R CC Cq i 69 69 69 6s 65 M 6R \D LO k 69 6R W L O U ^Ci ++ O OOO O O O O O OOOOOOO O O O O O O O OO O O O,A .0 d1 In O •• DD O O 69 bA wq 1* 69 6f1 N69 00 tl- M m 4 a £, 69 69 69 O = y M 6A 6A W 69 69 000 o vi000000 00 o�n d o 000 tn v000�000 00 o�n to � ,� O O � O q Vl v1 enN. .•-� r- V1 en ON 00 N d' O 00 Hof' 6R 6�96o5bAiA�6A W W in M h 00 O O O O O o+ .q M N 69 6H 69 69 h q � W W A .fl d vl O M O N O O O O d' O C d" •--i .-+ N %0 Is M i+ 7 Wa =cn�� zwzzdd ¢¢ �aaa c� cnoaooww ww a Vl y d V 0D U O L 0 w aC L w ad dG7U3 0 UU°'j ° ^o q r.i O O O YE O d Cn L q q 41 d 60'� CoCoad U L E O w q � Im O d CJ a �; 0 0 Ci O O L 'L7 "O co '•O L w i0. Haa,v�wv�UUcs4UUFi+ F- L dr�ddG7v� i- m-i r - ATTACHMENT 1 15Q (I O R TW�t 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 22 CONSENT CALENDAR: /J ITEM TITLE: Approval to Re -appropriate Transportation STUDY SESSION: Congestion Relief Funds for Fiscal Year 2000/2001 PUBLIC HEARING: Re -appropriate $21,973.4 in Transportation Congestion Relief (TCR) Funds to the Citywide Street and Sidewalk Improvements, Project No. 2000-04. The City of La Quinta received $172,777.92 in TCR funding in Fiscal Year 2000/2001. These funds must be expended in accordance with the criteria outlined within Section 14556.5 of the Government Code on/or before June 30, 2002. Considering the eligibility criteria and the expenditure deadline, the available funding was appropriated toward the following improvements: Project TCR Funding Amount 714 - Washington Street/Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation $72,265.82 712 - Calle Durango/Avenida Juarez Intersection Reconstruction $31,946.30 717 - Calle Tampico/Eisenhower Drive and Avenida Bermudas/Avenue $30,141 .40 52 Pavement Rehabilitation, and Adams Street Sidewalk Reconstruction Eisenhower Drive Asphalt Patch (City P.O. 00398) $13,698.40 692 - Ave 52 Safety Improvements $24,726.00 TOTAL $172,777.92 As illustrated, $30,141.40 was appropriated toward the Calle Tampico/Eisenhower Drive and Avenida Bermudas/Avenue 52 Pavement Rehabilitation, and Adams Street Sidewalk Improvements. Of this amount, $8,168.00 was expended for the preparation of the Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E). Unfortunately, the City did not receive any bids for these improvements during the scheduled bid opening on May 15, 2002. The project is being re -advertised and construction is expected to occur after the June 30, 2002 TCR funding expenditure deadline. Therefore, staff is recommending the balance of unexpended TCR funds, in the amount of $21,973.40, be re -assigned to the 1. 5 , T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020618b.wpd Citywide Street and Sidewalk Improvements, Project No. 2000-04. Appropriation of TCR Funding toward the improvements identified above will free up the previously budgeted general fund and infrastructure fund revenues for future allocation by the City Council. None. Pursuant to Section 14556.6 of the Government Code, the City of La Quinta received $172,777.92 in TCR funds during Fiscal Year 2000/2001. The TCR Funds allocated to a City shall be used for street and highway maintenance, rehabilitation, reconstruction, and storm damage repair. These eligible expenditure areas are further defined as follows: 1. Maintenance means either or both of the following: a. Patching; or b. Overlay and sealing. 2. Reconstruction includes any overlay, sealing, or widening of the roadway, if the widening is necessary to bring the roadway width to the desirable minimum width consistent with the geometric Caltrans design criteria for 313 (reconstruction, resurfacing, and rehabilitation) projects. Excluded projects are those that would increase traffic capacity. 3. Storm damage repair means the repair or reconstruction of local streets and highways and related drainage improvements that have been damaged due to winter storms and flooding, and construction of drainage improvements to mitigate future roadway flooding and damage problems, in those jurisdictions that have been declared disaster areas by the President of the United States, where the costs of those repairs are ineligible for emergency funding with Federal Emergency Relief (ER) funds. The TCR Funding received for Fiscal Year 2000/2001 must be expended in accordance with the eligibility criteria on or before June 30, 2002. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 158 Re -appropriate $21,973.4 in Transportation Congestion Relief (TCR) Funds to the Citywide Street and Sidewalk Improvements, Project No. 2000-04; or AdU.. T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020618b.wpd 2. Do not re -appropriate $21,973.4 in Transportation Congestion Relief (TCR) Funds to the Citywide Street and Sidewalk Improvements, Project 2000-04; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction Respectfull F. $"teDhenton. P.E. Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 151 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020618b.wpd 003 `-,3 T,&t 4 4 0" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE:June 18, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE:Approval of Plans, Specifications and STUDY SESSION: Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Costs and Authorization to Advertise for Bids, for the La Quinta PUBLIC HEARING: Community Park, Project No. 2000-1 1. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) and authorize staff to advertise for bid for the La Quinta Community Park, Project No. 2000-1 1 . FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The following represents the approved funding and funding sources: Quimby: Park DIF: State Grant: Total Funding Available: Less Prior Expenditures: Total Funding Remaining: $225,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 $500,000.00 $ 2,725,000.00 ($ 219,000.00) $2,506,000.00 Considering the Engineer's estimate of probable construction costs in the amount of $3,179,948.00, the following represents the estimated project budget: Construction: Insp/Test/Survey: Administration (remaining balance): Professional (remaining balance): Contingency: Total: $3,179,948.00 $ 247,000.00 $1 16, 400.00 $45,000.00 $358,835.00 $ 3, 947,183.00 160 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020618h.wpd As illustrated, the tentative project budget is ($1,441,183.00) short of the estimated costs associated with these improvements. Considering the identified budget is based upon the estimated construction costs provided by the design architect and that actual bids have not yet been received, staff are not recommending any budget adjustments at this time. However, staff will be prepared to address this budget issue after project bids are received. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: This project is partially funded with State grant funds and must be bid utilizing prevailing wage requirements. Therefore, there are no charter city implications. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The proposed La Quinta Community Park will be located on approximately 18 acres at the northeast corner of Westward Ho Drive and Adams Street. The Community Park will consist of various sized lighted soccer fields, two lighted baseball fields, a concession stand, restrooms, tot lot, lighted basketball court, picnic areas with barbeques and shade structures. On March 7, 2000, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Purkiss-Rose-RSI to provide the Community Park Master Plan Update. On February 6, 2001, the City Council accepted the Community Park conceptual design and project phasing. On December 18, 2001, the City Council adopted a Resolution certifying the Environmental Assessment 2001-438 subject to the mitigation program for CEQA compliance, and adopted a Resolution approving Capital Improvement Project 2001- 694, subject to the recommended conditions. The PS&E for the La Quinta Community Park are now complete and available for review. Assuming City Council authorization to receive bids for the La Quinta Community Park on June 18, 2002, the following represents how the project is expected to proceed: Approve PS&E/Auth. to Receive Bids Bid Period Approval to Award Construction Construction Period Accept Improvements June 18, 2002 July 2002 August 6, 2002 August 2002 - February 2003 March 2003 1.61. T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020618h.wpd 002 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) and authorize staff to advertise for bid for the La Quinta Community Park, Project No. 2000-1 1; or, 2. Do not approve the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) and authorize staff to advertise for bid for the La Quinta Community Park, Project No. 2000-1 1; or, 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully su RYoy F/Stephenson, P.E. Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 1.60 TAMDEMCOUNCIL\2002\020616h. wpd - 001 T4ht 4:wQ" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: l5 ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution Granting STUDY SESSION: Conditional Approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map 30519, Sedona PUBLIC HEARING: Homes, Inc. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for Parcel Map 30519, KSL Desert Resorts (Sedona Homes). None. None. Parcel Map 30519 is located east of Eisenhower Drive and south of Avenue 50 (Attachment 1), and consists of 4 parcels (Attachment 2). The developer has requested the City Council's conditional approval of the Final Map which will allow 30 days for completion of its processing. To date, the SIA for the required monumentation has been executed by the developer but the associated securities have not been received. The final map is technically complete and is being routed for signatures. It is expected that the associated securities and all signatures will be in place within the time allowed with its conditional approval. As a result, City staff has prepared the attached Resolution which provides for conditional approval of the Final Map and SIA. The approval is contingent upon receipt, within 30 days (July 18, 2002), of a technically correct Final Map suitable for recording by the County Recorder with all required signatures except for the City Clerk, SIA and associated Securities. 163 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020618e.wpd Once these items are received, the City Clerk will affix the City Seal to the Final Map and offer the final map for recording by the County Recorder. If any of the required items are not received by City staff within the specified time frame, the Final Map will be considered disapproved and will be rescheduled for City Council consideration only after all required items have been received. The developer has demonstrated to City staff that sufficient progress has been made with the documents required for conditional final map approval. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map 30519, (KSL Desert Resorts (Sedona Homes); or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map 30519, KSL Desert Resorts (Sedona Homes); or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respeptfully submitted, Roy F. Step[ rterim Publi Attachments: on, P.E. orks Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: jx� Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 1. Vicinity Map 2. Tract Map 3. Subdivision Improvement Agreement 1r T:\PWDEPT\COUNCiL\2002\020618e.wpd RESOLUTION NO. 2002- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF LA QUINTA GRANTING CONDITIONAL FINAL MAP APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP 30519, AND AUTHORIZING A TIME EXTENSION FOR SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO VALIDATE THE APPROVAL WHEREAS, the City Council conducts only two regular meetings per month and the time interval between these meetings occasionally creates an undue hardship for business enterprises and individuals seeking approval of subdivision maps, and WHEREAS, the City Council as a matter of policy allows a subdivider to have city staff present the map for approval consideration when the requisite items necessary for final map approval are nearly, but not completely, finished thus yielding to the subdivider additional production time for preparation of those items, and WHEREAS, the subdivider has demonstrated to city staff and the City Council that it has made sufficient progress with items required for final map approval, and it is reasonable to expect the subdivider to satisfactorily complete the items, including city staff review time, within thirty (30) days without adversely impacting other ongoing work commitments of city staff, and WHEREAS, Section 66458(b) of the Subdivision Map Act grants the City Council broad authority to authorize time extensions regarding final map approval, or disapproval, upon receiving it for consideration, and WHEREAS, the City Council relies on professional city staff to review all required items for conformance with relevant requirements, and it is therefore appropriate for the City Council to approve the final map subject to review and confirmation of the required items by professional city staff, within a reasonable period of time as specified by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of La Quinta does hereby find, determine, order and resolve as follows: Section 1. The final map for Parcel Map 30519 is conditionally approved provided the subdivider submits all required items on or before July 18, 2002. Section 2. The City Council's approval of the final map shall not be considered valid until the City Engineer has signed the map indicating that it conforms with the tentative map, the Subdivision Map Act and all ordinances of the City. Section 3. The City Engineer shall withhold his signature from the map until the subdivider has completed the following requirements to the City Engineer's 165 satisfaction. 003 A. Place appropriate securities in accordance with the approved Subdivision Improvement Agreement. B. Finalize the final Parcel Map and obtain all necessary signatures. Section 4. The City Clerk shall withhold affixing the City Seal to the map title page, along with her attesting signature, until the City Engineer has signed the map. Section 5. The time extension for satisfying the requirements of the conditional approval for this final map shall expire when City offices close for regular business on July 18, 2002. If the subdivider has not satisfied the requirements in Section 3, herein, by the expiration deadline, the final map shall be considered disapproved. Disapproval does not deny any rights the subdivider may have under the Map Act to resubmit the final map for approval, or disapproval. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 18th day of June, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 166 004 PARCEL MAP NO. 305fu ACHMENT 1 AVENIDA FERNANDO ■ LA QUINTA > Z HOTEL GOLF & Of 0 W TENNIS RESORT (if w m 0 0 a = o z w z cn w w a AVENUE 50 PROJECT SITE Q 0 Of VICINITY MAP w m NOT TO SCALE o Z w a M O R S E 79-799 Old Avenue 52 D O K I C X La Qulma, CA 92253 ALLE AMP kco 16 7 Voice:760.771-4013 C S C X U L i z FAX: 760-771-4073 v lJVf E!� 6 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS A 51702 MAPPING 30125-2 VICINITY 5-22-02 ATTACHME 2 IN THE CITY OF IA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PARCEL MAP NO. 30519 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 30146. AS FILED IN BOOK 199. PAGES 55 AND 56 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MDS CONSULTING FEBRUARY. 2002 GARY W. DOKICH L.S.4693 OWNER'S STATEMENT WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON: THAT WE ARE THE ONLY PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS A CLEAR TITLE TO SAID LAND, THAT WE CONSENT TO THE MAKING AND RECORDATION ON THIS SUBDMSION AS SHOWN WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE. KSL DESERT RESORTS, INC.. A DELAWARE CORPORATION AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO KSL U OUINTA CORPORATION, A DEIAWARE CORPORATION BY: LARRY E. LICHUTER, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ;S.S. COUNTY OF ON THIS —DAY OF , 2002. BEFORE ME NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE PERSONALLY APPEARED PERSON— ALLY KNOWN TO ME/PROVED ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE. TO BE THE PERSONS WHOSE NAMES ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITIES. AND THAT BY THEIR SIGNATURES ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSONS DR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSONS ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. S1RIx'F3lE1.^_ l TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS RECORDER'S STATEMENT FILED THISDAY OF , 2002 AT_ M. IN BOON OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF LA OUINTA NO. FEE GARY L ORSO, COUNTY RECORDER BY: _ DEPUTY SUBDIVSION QUARANTEE BY: FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE, AS OF THIS DATE, THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE WITHIN LAP FOR UNPAID STATE. COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES NOW A LIEN, BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, WHICH ARE ESTIMATED TO BE PAUL McDONNELL DATE: COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR DEPUTY TAX BOND CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND IN THE SUM OF f HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND FILED WITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONED UPON THE PAY— MENT OF ALL TAXES, STATE. COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL, AND ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAKES, WHICH AT THE TIME OF FILING OF THIS LAP WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER ARE A LIEN AGAINST SAID PROPERTY BUT NOT YET PAYABLE AND SAID BOND HAS BEEN DULY APPROVED BY SAID BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. DATE: CASH TAX BOND GERALD A. MALONEY PAUL McDONNELL CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR BY: DEPUTY BY: DEPUTY SIGNATURE MY PRINCIPAL PUCE OF BUSINESS SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT: NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE IS IN COUNTY THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND IS BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY IN MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: CONFORMANCE WITH THE AR REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDM90N MACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE PRINT NAME REQUEST OF KSL DESERT RESORTS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION ON MARCH 1, 2001. 1 HEREBY STATE THAT ALL MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED, OR WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE MONUMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE MAR, AND THAT SAID MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAR, IF ANY. DATE: . 2002�y�oNr.LWu�s GARY W. DOKICH L.S. 4693 EXP. 9/30/ 03 E.x wsJ i $ �tf � QLII� CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT: 1 HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE WITHIN ANNEXED MAR OF PARCEL MAR 140. 30519 CONSISTING OF TWO (2) SHEETS, THAT THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE MAR AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAR ACT AND ANY LOCAL ORDINANCES APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH. DATE: . 2002 ROY F. STEPHENSON R.C.E. 20354 EXP. 9/30/05 INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER, CRY OF IA QUINTA SURVEYOR'S NOTES — INDICATES FOUND F I.P. TAGGED LS. 4693, FLUSH, PER P.N.B. 189/29-31, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. O — INDICATES FOUND F I.P. TAGGED L.S. 4693, FLUSH, PER P.M.B. 199/55-56, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. O — INDICATES SET 1' I.P. TAGGED L.S. 4693, FLUSH, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I' IRON PIPE TAGGED LS. 4693, RUSH; OR LEAD TACK TAGGED L.S. 4693 IN CONCRETE TO BE SET AT ALL LOT CORNERS; OR IF LOT CORNER FALLS ON FACE OF CURB, LEAD AND TACK TAGGED L.S. 4693 IN TOP OF CURB ON A 0.25' OFFSET. TO BE SET AT ALL FRONT PARCEL CORNERS, EXCEPT AT B.C.'S, E.C.-S, P.R.C.'S THAT ABUT A STREET WHICH ARE NOT LOT CORNERS MARKING SIDE LOT LINES; UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN 'SET SHALL BE SET N ACCORDANCE WITH THE MONUMENTATION AGREEMENT FOR THIS MAR, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ( ) — INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED DATA PER P.M.B. 189/29-31. [ ] — INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED DATA PER P.M.B. 199/55-56. THIS PARCEL LAP CONTAINS 4 PARCELS. THIS PARCEL MAR CONTAINS 7.D47 ACRES. BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE FAST LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT I AS SHOWN AS NORTH 0000'46' WEST, ON TRACT NO. 14496-1 AS FILED IN BOOK 119, PAGES 9 THROUGH 15. OF LAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. EASEMENTS COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, HOLDER OF EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC ROADS AND RIGHTS OF WAY, PRIVATE EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY, FOR IRRIGATING AND DOMESTIC WATER PURPOSES. (NOT PLOTTABLE) Al — LANDMARK LOUD CO., INC., AND UNIQUE GOLF CONCEPTS, INC., HOLDERS OF AN EASEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR ACCESS, PER DOCUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 4, 1982 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 133556. OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (BLANKET IN NATURE) CITY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT: I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE WITHIN MAP OF PARCEL MAP NO, 30519 CONSISTING OF TWO (2) SHEETS AND I AM SATISFIED THAT SAID MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT. DATE: , 2002 ERIC A. NELSON P.L.S. 5563 EXP. 9/30/2005 ACTING CITY SURVEYOR CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT: I, JUNE S. GREEK, CITY CLERK AND EX—OFFICIO OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A OUINTA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY STATE THAT SAID CITY COUNCIL AT ITS REGULAR MEETING HELD ON THE DAY OF , 2002, APPROVED THE WITHIN LAP OF PARCEL MAR 140. 30519. DATED: JUNE S. GREEK CITY CLERK AND EX—OFFICIO CLERK OF THE CITY OF LA OUNTA SIGNATURE OMISSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 66436 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAR ACT, THE SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING OWNERS OF EASEMENTS AND/OR OTHER INTERESTS HAVE BEEN OMITTED. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, HOLDER OF EASEMENTS FOR PUSUC ROADS AND RIGHTS OF WAY, PRIVATE EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY, FOR IRRIGATING AND DOMESTIC WATER PURPOSES. (NOT PLOTTABLE) THE CITY OF LA OUINTA HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF SUNLNE TRANSIT AGENCY, PER DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 12, 1999 AS INSTRUMENT/FILE NO. 012216. OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. LANDMARK LAND CO.. INC., AND UNIQUE GOLF CONCEPTS, INC., HOLDERS OF AN EASEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR ACCESS, PER DOCUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 4, 1982 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 133556. OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (BLANKET IN NATURE) )07 N \ �57. x7 . \y_ �569 5• y i J CD !N f)6 . 63%)• PAR, I ? T. DETAIL 'A' NO SCALE r L1 U IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PARCEL MAP NO. 30519 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 30146. AS FILED IN BOOK 199, PAGES 55 AND 56 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AIDS CONSULTING FEBRUARY. 2002 GARY W. DOKICH LS.4693 FOUND I" I.P., TAGGED RCE 21775. FLUSH, PER PMB 189/9-31 AND T> , 3,0411 NIS, 66 /0 4-3 ;3 TO. 1' I.P., TAGGED RCE 21775,— RUSH, PER PAID 189/9-31 AND CITY OF IA GUINEA TIES, ACC. AS E.C. r FD. I• I.P., TAGGED RCE 11711, ucrRl lrrNw W FLUSH, PER PMB 189/9-31 AND CITY OF IA GUINEA TIES, ACC. AS B.C. SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS FO. 3/4' I.P., TAGGED RCE 862, FLUSH, PER PMB 1B9/29-31 AND RS 66/24-27, ACC. AS SEC. CDR. �31 FD. I' I.P., TAGGED RCE 21775, ^ FLUSH. PER PMB 189/29-31 AND m CITY OF LA OUINTA TIES, ACC. AS WLY LINE OF SEC. 6 AND _ C AVENUE 50. zai.BD'-1. iT44_02'f.Ti ,T, e CITY OF LA OUINTA TIES. C/L_—(N 89'S_3'34'V) 1317.43' (131R=—'-1--215371 77�•49� z—nBz'A 200000' 744I)2LN 'S3'34'V 61/.20')(0= IL, 894� _ 25 ter_ _----- R-�.00' L= 731' [N 09'53'34'V 579.30') r� t� --[.}- — [1096'19'El 1 FD. RN/5Ei NAIL IN i0P OGY50'�, IN 89'53'74'V 202.65'] [0=T51'4T R=cT5D. 00' L=281'73] [N 82' i1 WALL. PER PMB IB9/29-31, �.I IN LIEU OF 2" I.P., TAGGEDto `� ➢J1 IN 9%O9'74'VI PARCEL A a=1 RCE 862, PER R.S. 66/24-27. o C 198.98.1 �'-1 ACC. AS HE CON. SEC. 1 F- °I y, e m o4; SEE DETAIL 'A' PACE -I ABOVE LEFT RM, 30148 =l�_-- INB9'48'34'W 170.22'1 N6J%(�• ti =8 1`` �lN 69%SppV SEE DETAIL'B' Pm C 2 N65• /SS72•) BELOW _ Z1 7jJ71` fJ0/l• ',,PARCEL 2 — — 0,164 AC. r . 781, 507 3 A ?•g 1 ,G W N 6050'37W a$ SI X � p1D �7x1.1g. m•6 ` 21.98' S `�� 7b�A74., .. PARCEL 2 � 77J pB• N Pm, 30-m's PARCEL 3� "61,o v SS• 1Yc, P.0.044 AC. � m\ & 1J J/55-55 OS '� f9j�l ��1p7Pof•77•* PARCELI 6.497 AC. 1 c n N 7912'46W 63.43*.,3• PARCEL 4 0.341 AC. ,A, 89.07' /9I.00.7 T17'W N71S 1 PARCEL 3 P.1 A. 30145 W 370'3000 �` NWjS, IN 7W'S0' 2533- ` P.J\i1.B, OLSg00 V] - P.M.B.-11j�/!�-31 PARCEL 3 P` IN47'5448'VI 169,823 `I 1 1 ` (NG'4501'11 � � 17900'I — d• a, 1 — (N BJ'1/'S9'6234.991, -N 5'50'34W 41-55' 10.B7' J 8401 ET (134.990 —w 7q•53'03'E 520.98) — — — — — _ _ _ _ — —.°& 235i N BB'45'S9'V T e �NLY LINE PER C V/ W,J, yI `S'LY LINE PMO.R. 8I-10683 . 1 PER OLEANDER RESERVOIR EVACUATION CHANNEL O.R. 83-61389. M B9'S757'V 1321_60')— _ _ — _ _ _ — _ — son0 T — _ — — _ _ — — _ — — — — — (1271.601) FOUND 1-i/2' I.P. TAGGED R.C.E. 862, — ^ ` GOVERNMENT LOT 7 FLUSH, PER P.M.B. 189/29-31 m ACCEPTED AS SE COR. GOV. LOT 1 .,Iy ^m FOUND 1" I.P., IN WELL TAGGED FOUND I' I.P. TAGGED CITY vl CITY ENGINEER - RCE 11111, ENGINEER - RCE 32740, FLUSH ` PER PMB 189/29-31. C� CALLS TAIrPICO PERPMB 189/29-31. _—_—___._—__—_ (N 89'54'45'V 1726N7 �__—__—___—_ OCURVE TABLE NO DELTA RADIUS ARC LGT TAN 1 [ 7-39:34' BO¢00' IOG95' 5355' I 2 [ 3'44DO 2050m• 133.58• 66DI' 1 3 90'00'OP 3¢00 47.12' 30.00' 4 1 10'45'00' 659W 123.64' 62DO' I 5 1 30-55'03' 79.00' 42.63' 21.95' 1 6 1 73'09'28' 40D0' 51.07' 29.68'I 7 1 15-15'00' 659.00, 17540' 8822' 1 8 1 4'25'37' MAID, 158.39' 7924' 1 9 72'59'26' IODA' 127.39' 73.98' 10 38'34'10' BOX 57D5' 27.99' II 51'25'S0' 3¢OO' 26,93' 14.45' 12108.10'56' IODO' low13.81, 13 40'31'14' 2BA0' 19.8¢ I¢34' H 6-00'00' 3DOW 31.42' 15.72' 15 IB-29'38- 25,00' 8107' 4.07' 16 42'30'OV 3B.BD' 37D9' 19.44' [:]COURSE TABLE NO BEARING LENGTH N 41'12'10' V 4837' Gy 72'SSDp•V 2 N 72'30,00, V 10.91, 3 N 66'30'00' V 29.97' Aut 2 .'5111 4 N 17'05'00' E 6,33' A0,�7Yr.. X� 5 N 17'05000' E 3.00' N 72,55�V PARCa 1 zB�./9.� DETAIL 'B' ND SCALE (- SCALE 1"=100' 100 50 0 100 200 300 86-229807 .a R 9 ATTACHMENT 3 CITY OF LA QUINTA SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT Parcel Map 30519 THIS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement') is made and entered into this day of 20 by and between KSL Desert Resorts, a Deleware Corporation, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Subdivider," and the City of La Quinta, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City." RECITALS: A. Subdivider has prepared and filed a final map or parcel map (the "Map') of a unit of land in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, which unit of land is known as Parcel Map 30519 (the "Tract') pursuant to the provisions of Section 66410, et sec. of the California Government Code (the "Subdivision Map Act'). B. Within one year of the recordation of the Map, the Subdivider is required set survey monuments as shown on the recorded map. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: Monumentation Security. A. Monumentation security shall conform with Section 66499 of the California Government Code and one of the following: 1) A cash deposit with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company, at City's option. B. All securities shall be fumished in accordance with the provisions of Exhibit A. The amount of the performance security shall equal One Hundred Percent (100%) of the estimated cost of the furnishing and installing the monuments. C. Security shall not expire, be reduced or become wholly or partially invalid for any reason, including non-payment of premiums, modifications of this Agreement and/or expiration of the time for performance stated in this Agreement, without express authorization from City unless the surety provides City with sixty (60) days written notice by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. D. Security shall be released in the following manner: 1) Performance security shall be released upon the final completion and acceptance or approval, by the City Council of the Improvements subject to the provisions of paragraph B. 2. Survey Monuments. The Subdivider shall place survey monuments in accordance with the provisions of Sections 66495, et sec. of the Subdivision Map Act and of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Subdivider shall provide the City Engineer written proof that the monuments have been set, evidence of payment and receipt thereof by the engineer or surveyor setting the monuments, and intersection monument tie -outs for monuments set in public streets. 3. Release of Security. City shall retain and release securities in accordance with the provisions of Section 1 of this agreement. Prior to the release of payment security, the City Engineer may require Subdivider to provide a title report or other evidence sufficient to show claims of lien, if any, that may affect the amount of payment security released. i"r T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\Schulze\Parcel Maps\Pm30519\PM30519-SIA.wpd " 9 3 4. City Right to Cure. If Subdivider fails to perform any obligation hereunder and such obligation has not been performed within sixty (60) days after written notice of default from City, then City may perform the obligation, and Subdivider shall pay the entire cost of such performance by City including costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing such obligation. In cases of emergency or compelling public interest, as determined by the City Engineer, the requirement for written notice of default and/or the passage of sixty (60) days shall be deemed waived and all other provisions of this Article shall remain in effect. 5. Indemnification. Subdivider hereby binds itself, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, executors, administrators, guarantors, heirs, and assigns, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold City and its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and assigns harmless from and against any losses, claims, demands, actions, or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, arising out of or in any way connected with Subdivider's performance herein under, including costs of suit and reasonable attomeys' fees. 6. No Modification of Conditions. This Agreement shall in no respect act to modify or amend any provision of the Conditions of Approval. In the event that any requirement or condition of this Agreement is inconsistent with or fails to include one or more provisions of the Conditions of Approval, which document(s) is (are) incorporated herein by reference, the provisions in the Conditions of Approval shall remain in effect and shall control. 7. Severability. In the event that any provision or provisions of this Agreement are held unenforceable, all provisions not so held shall remain in full force and effect. 8. General Provisions A. All notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the parties at their respective addresses indicated hereon. Notices personally delivered shall be effective upon delivery. Notices mailed as provided herein and sent postage prepaid shall be effective upon the date of delivery or refusal indicated on the return receipt. Either party may change its address for notices hereunder by notice to the other given in the manner provided in this subparagraph. B. The terms, conditions, covenants, and agreements set forth herein shall apply to and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors of the parties hereto. C. Neither party to this Agreement relies upon any warranty or representation not contained in this Agreement. D. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted with respect to the laws of the State of California. E. In the event of any dispute between the parties with respect to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to prompt payment of its reasonable attorneys' fees from the non -prevailing party. F. Any failure or delay by either party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any such rights or remedies provided for hereunder. .1.71. T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\Schulze\Parcel Maps\Pm30519\PM30519-SIA.wpd Page 2.pf) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. CITY: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk SUBDIVIDER: By: Title: By: Title: Reviewed and Approved: City Engineer Approved as to Form: City Attorney Date Date Date City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 7601777-7075 KSL Desert Resorts, Inc. A Delaware Corporation (760)564-8000 Attn: Larry E. Lichliter Executive Vice President Date Date T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\Schulze\Parcel Maps\Pm30519\PM30519-SIA.wpd fflaa e'i3I 3 Exhibit A SECURITY - PARCEL MAP 30519 Except as otherwise provided herein, Subdivider shall furnish performance security prior to agendization of the Map for approval by the City Council. Monumentation security shall guarantee performance of or payment for the work and shall be utilized or released as specified in Chapter 4, Article 9 of the Subdivision Map Act. Improvement Description Performance Monumentation $2,240 Total: $2,240 012 T4t!t 4 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: A0 ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Improvements Associated STUDY SESSION: with Tract 29623, Sunflower PUBLIC HEARING: Accept improvements to Tract 29623 and authorize staff to release security upon receiving the 10% one year warranty security. Acceptance of the improvements will impact the General Fund as follows: Maintenance and street sweeping is estimated to be $924 annually. None. Sunflower subdivision is located north of Miles Avenue, east of Dune Palms Road (Attachment 1). All improvements are now complete and other obligations of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement have been satisfied. Included as Attachment 2 is a spreadsheet indicating security to be released after the City receives the 10% one year warranty security. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Accept improvements to Tract 29623 and authorize staff to release security upon receiving warranty security; or 2. Do not accept improvements to Tract 29623; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. 1.74 T:\PWDEPT\C0UNCIL\2002\02061 Sd.wpd Respectfully submitted, Ro p h e As Interim Oublic Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Security Outline 1.75 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020618d.wpd MENT 1 il ,-: 004 ATTACHMENT 2 TRACT 29623 --Performance Security Current Proposed Reduced Improvement Description Labor & Materials Amount Reduction Amount Grading $111,200 $111,200 90% $11,120 Streets &Storm Drainage $298,618 $298,618 90% $29,862 Median Island & Landscaping' $0 $0 -0- $0 Domestic Water $55,125 $55,125 90% $5,513 Sanitary Sewer $63,440 $63,440 90% $6,344 Electrical $87,500 $87,500 90% $8,750 Perimeter & Basin Landscape $107,135 $107,135 90% $10,714 Perimeter Wall $63,760 $63,760 0% $6,376 Monumentation $0 $3,000 100% $0 Totals: $786,778 $789,778 $78,679 *The median island and landscaping on Miles Avenue shall be constructed along the property frontage of Tracts 29623 and 25691 by the Subdivider subject to a reimbursement agreement approved by the City Council for these improvements and soft costs. Release performance security when warranty security is received. Release labor & materials security in 90 days (September 16, 2002). Release warranty security in one year (June 18, 2003). TAMDEPl1COUNCIL\2002\02061 Sd.wpd -4 ►y 005 T4t!t 4 4Qur«rw AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: /7 ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Avenue 52 Widening Project STUDY SESSION: from Cetrino Street to Jefferson Street, Project No. 1999-04-A PUBLIC HEARING: Accept Project No. 1999-04-A, Avenue 52 Widening Project from Cetrino Street to Jefferson Street as 100% complete; and Authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and Authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $8,043.00, 35 days following the recordation of the Notice of Completion. IL 1;Lei The following is a summary of the project budget and costs: Beginning Balance $106,969.00 Project Expenditures to Date ($12,761.27) Subtotal $94,207.73 Base Contract Amount $76,580.00 Account Balance Remaining $17,627.73 Adequate funds are available in the project budget to pay the contractor retention and to close-out the construction phase of this project. None. L T:\P W DEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020818a.wpd The project scope is defined as safety improvements on Avenue 52, from Cetrino Street east to Jefferson Street. The improvements included widening the existing road surface shoulder on the south side of the street by six (6) feet and modifying the signing and striping on the eastbound side. This does not increase the vehicular capacity but allows motorist a margin of safety when he or she is caught off guard by the change in the road alignment in this area. In June 1998, this project was submitted to Caltrans for funding in the Fiscal Year 2000/2001 Hazard Elimination Safety (HES) Program. The project was approved to receive HES funding on July 15, 1999. The project was approved by City Council as part of the Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The project's construction effort is now deemed to be 100% complete and is in compliance with the project plans and specifications. Prior to filing the Notice of Completion, staff must receive authorization from the City Council to approve this project as 100% complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion. This project had 30 consecutive calendar days to complete the original scope of work. The contractor was given 'Notice to Proceed' on May 13, 2002 which stipulated a contract completion date of June 11, 2002. The Contractor completed all contract work on May 31, 2002. In accordance with the contract specifications by completing the contract work early the Contractor is eligible to receive $300 per day as an early completion incentive to a maximum of $3,000. Contract Change Order No. 2 (Attachment 1) is recommended for approval in the amount of $3,000 to compensate the Contractor for completing the contract work 11 days prior to the contract completion date. A final accounting of this Contract is as follows: Original Bid $76,580.00 Approved Contract Change Order No. 1 (Concrete Sub -base) $3,850.00 Total Contract: $80,430.00 Amount Paid to Date ($72,387.00) Subtotal (withheld retention): $8,043.00 Pending Contract Change Order No. 2 (Early Completion Incentive) $3,000.00 Remaining fiscal commitment: $11,043.00 179 T AP W D E PT\C O U N C I U2 002 \02 0618 a. wpd The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Accept Project No. 1999-04-A, Avenue 52 Widening Project from Cetrino Street to Jefferson Street as 100% complete; and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $8,043.00, 35 days following the recordation of the Notice of Completion; or 2. Do not accept Project No. 1999-04-A, Avenue 52 Widening Project from Cetrino Street to Jefferson Street as 100% complete; and do not authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and do not authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $8,043.00, 35 days following the recordation of the Notice of Completion; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully_}jbmitt , _ Rdy F. �-Iephen`son, P.E. Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Contract Change Order No. 2 ( Early Completion Incentive) 180 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020618a.wpd ATTACHMENT 1 4 4Q" U c<�,mk4 ti5 OF t1 9 CONTRACT: CONTRACTOR: Sheet 1 of 1 AVENUE 52 WIDENING FROM CETRINO STREET TO JEFFERSON STREET Covered J.C. 28678 Skyway Dr. Ranchita, Ca. 92066 PROJECT NO. 1999-04 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.2 Pursuant to the terms of the original Contract Agreement, you are hereby directed to make the herein described changes or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications for this Contract. Unless otherwise stated all work shall conform to the terms, general conditions, and special provisions of the original Contract. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE This Contract Change Order allows for the award of the Early Completion Incentive offered as per Section 1400-6.5 of the Project Specifications. Specifications allow for $300 per working day for a 10 working days for a total of $3,000.00 Total: $ 3,000.00 Previous Contract Amount Through Change Order No. 2 $ 80,430.00 Add This Change Order $ 3,000.00 Revised Contract Total $ 83,430.00 By reason of this contract change order the time of completion is adjusted as follows: -0- days added to contract time. The revised contract completion date shall be: 06/12/ 02 Submitted By: Date: Approved By: -Date: We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, perform all labor, except as may be noted above, and perform all services necessary to complete the above specified work, anal hereby accept as full payment the amount shown above, which includes all direct and indirect overhead expenses for any delays. Accepted By: Contractor: Title: Date: la 1% lo Z t8t 005 T4'!t 4 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 Approval of Application for SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Grant Funds for Installation of Sidewalk Adjacent to the La Quinta Park RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: W Approve an SB 821 Program grant application in the amount of $55,852.91 for the installation of sidewalks adjacent to the La Quinta Park. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The total cost for the proposed sidewalk project is estimated at $79,789.88. The City is proposing a 30% match (or $23,936.97) in order to increase its chances of receiving the grant award. The City's share would be funded with Park Development Impact Fees. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None for this action. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The City of La Quinta recently received notification from the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) regarding the availability of SB 821 Program funds. Section 99233.3 of the State Public Utilities Code sets aside 2% of the Local Transportation Fund in each county to fund facilities for the exclusive use of pedestrians and bicyclists. For FY 2002-03 (beginning July 2002), it is estimated that $873,000 will be available for Riverside County. The City has been awarded funds under this grant program on several occasions in the past and has applied in this cycle. The City's proposed project for the upcoming Fiscal Year involves the installation of sidewalks on the east side of Adams Street (from Westward Ho to 650 feet north) 182 and on the north side of Westward Ho (from Adams Street to 1,600 feet east), adjacent to the future La Quinta Park. The SB 821 application is included as Attachment 1 and due to the short time frame, was submitted to the Riverside County Transportation Commission on May 31, 2002. If the Council chooses not to approve the City's grant application, staff will withdraw it from RCTC. This sidewalk project was chosen to improve pedestrian safety and to connect existing sidewalks in the immediate vicinity. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve an SB 821 Program grant application in the amount of $55,852.91 for the installation of sidewalks adjacent to the La Quinta Park; or 2. Do not approve an SB 821 Program grant application in the amount of $55,852.91 for the installation of sidewalks adjacent to the La Quinta Park; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Debbie Powell, Management Analyst Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. SB 821 Program Grant Application for FY 2002/03 k [, ,taiga, b gsr+"h ��, c- wm, •�.rva'S41 'T - fY I CITY OF LA QUINTA FY 02- 03 SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM CALL FOR PROJECTS I. APPLICANT INFORMATION Lead Agency: City of La Quinta Address: 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Contact Person: Susan Matthew Title: Management Assistant, City Manager's Office Telephone #: (760) 777-7041 Fax #: (760) 777-7101 E-mail Address: smatthew@la-quinta.org II. PROJECT BUDGET AND SCHEDULE Revenue: Amount SB821 Requested: Amount Local Match: Total Project Cost: Expenses: Engineering/Admin/Inspection: Right of Way Clearing and Grubbing Construction Other (Contingency) Estimated Starting Date: Estimated Ending Date: $55,852.91 (70%) $23,936.97 (30%) $79,789.88 (100%) $8,732.50 -0-. Included as part of Excavation $60,650.00 $10,407.38 September 2002 April 2003 185 005 FY01/02 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program CALL FOR PROJECTS III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Indicate the nature and type of projects) proposed, design considerations and average daily auto tra>r1c levels in area. For sidewalk proposals the following MUST be providedIn residential areas indicate the number of residences along the segment. Where schools are served, provide the total enrollment as well as the number of students who walk to school along the roadway section identified for improvement. Ifsidewalks are available across the street from the project segment, this must be stated. (Attach additional pages if more space is needed). The City of La Quinta is proposing to install sidewalk on Adams Street (from Westward Ho Drive to + /- 650 feet north) and on Westward Ho Drive (from Adams Street to +/- 1,600 feet east), across from La Quinta High School and adjacent to a community park that is scheduled for completion in Spring 2003. Average daily traffic level per. day is 1,357 vehicles on Westward Ho Drive and 3,500 vehicles per day on Adams Street. In addition, two new schools, Amelia Earhart Elementary and John Glenn Middle, opened this past fall and are approximately % mile north of the project site. Although there are no houses directly adjacent to the proposed sidewalk, it will serve a large residential area that includes several housing tracts (ranging from 70 to over 200 units each) within one mile of the site, as well as a residential trailer park located less than one-half mile east of the site. La Quinta High School is the only high school in the 31.2 square -mile city, with an enrollment of 2,200 students this year, up from 1,900 last school year. Approximately 20% of the students currently walk to school. The design of the City's new La Quinta Community Park is complete and includes the proposed sidewalk improvements that will be located on the south and west boundaries of the park. This new park is a $3.5 million dollar project on over 18 acres with sports fields, playground, interactive water feature, picnic areas, and eventually, a skate park. The La Quinta Community Park will be a feature park in the City and is expected to draw area residents, especially children, throughout the year. The sidewalks will provide a safe, convenient access to the park. The park is scheduled for completion in Spring 2003. IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Address the project benefits according to the following Project Selection Criteria. A discussion of the criteria and assigned scoring points are included with the Call for Projects Transmittal Letter. 186 006 FY01/02 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program CALL FOR PROJECTS 1. Use The proposed sidewalk will be used by students to access La Quinta High School, and by neighborhood families and children traveling to and from the La Quinta Community Park. In addition, the sidewalk could be used by local residents to access the One -Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center, approximately one-half mile south of the project site. The Center includes a Wal-Mart, McDonald's, Stater Brother's Market, Staples, Ross Dress -for -Less, and several other shops and restaurants. 2. Safe Currently, there are narrow, sandy shoulders along the east side of Adams Street and along the north side of Westward Ho Drive. Students must walk close to the road, thus exposing themselves to heavy traffic. Along with parents driving their students to and from school, there are also many teenagers driving to and from school, which only increases the dangers for pedestrians walking in or near traffic. Additionally, it is imperative to provide a safe walkway for neighborhood children traveling to and from the new park. 3. Importance as a Transportation Alternative This project will provide a convenient transportation alternative for local students and area residents traveling to and from La Quinta High School, the La Quinta Community Park, and the nearby One -Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center. La Quinta High School, having sports fields, a football stadium, a pool, a track, and a theater, is also a venue for community events. These sidewalks would provide a transportation alternative for area residents attending these events. Area youth and adult sports organizations (soccer, baseball, football) will be using the fields at the La Quinta Community Park year-round. The installation of this sidewalk will encourage participants living in the nearby developments to walk to the park. 4. Missin4 Link, Extension, or Connectivity The proposed sidewalk on the east side of Adams Street will complete a missing link - connecting with existing sidewalk to the north, which leads into a residential development. It will also provide a link to sidewalk on the south side of Westward Ho Drive. The proposed sidewalk on the north side of Westward Ho will connect with existing sidewalk directly to the east, which leads to residential developments and the residential trailer park. 187 007 FY01/02 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program CALL FOR PROJECTS Matching Funds The City of La Quinta is providing a 30% match for this project. 5. Population Equity To be calculated by RCTC 6. Physical Accessibility Enhancement The sidewalks will be constructed within ADA guidelines and will include access ramps. This will enhance access to La Quinta High School, the future La Quinta Community Park, and the One -Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center. V. ATTACHED MAPS AND PHOTOGRAPHS Exhibit A: Site Photographs Exhibit B: Vicinity Map/ Project Location Exhibit C: Preliminary Engineer's Estimate VI. CERTIFICATION I certify that the information presented herein is complete and accurate and if this agency receives funding it will be used solely for the purposes stated in this application. Additionally, I understand that if funding is received,. RCTC will be provided with a Minute Action from our governing board approving the initiation of the work effort. Signature Title City Manager j.� Date 3 �� Z 008 The east side of Adams Street, facing north from Westward Ho Drive. 4 The north side of Westward Ho Drive, facing east from Adams Street. La Quinta High School can be seen across the street. umf EXHIBIT A y 8 Siff-me'br tk Ct: IL :iftfro C., yr _ • r Cmiy C`, La,ne C' . r pecan C est lk ks Li Geer, ao� 3 Desert S'imm C 1 ..... - i a.,- if P, S *M Proposed Sidewalk r Y� ,�,. • i 4� i A.� 3,cj<i[GAI'lioff 43 Existing Sidewalk � Fes" 63 -�-au Am C41 Q6 190 EXHIBIT B LA QUINTA COMMUNITY PARK SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS (Adams St. from Westward Ho North approx. 650 LF and on Westward Ho from Adams East approx. 1,600 LF) ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT JEST. QTY. UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST 1 5.5' Sidewalk w/ grading SF 13,500 $3.50 $47,250.00 2 Handicap Ramp EA 1 $900.00 $900.00 3 Excavation CY 500 $10.00 $5,000 4 Mobilization and Traffic Control LS 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $60,650.00 ENGINEERING COMPLETE: $0.00 INSPECTION/TESTING/SURVEY $5,700.00 CITY ADMINISTRATION $3,032.50 SOFT COST SUBTOTAL $8,732.50 PROJECT TOTAL: $69,382.50 CONTINGENCY (15%) $10,407.38 GRAND TOTAL $79,789.88 AMOUNT SB 821 REQUESTED (70%) $55,852.92 AMOUNT LOCAL MATCH (30%) $23,936.96 TOTAL PROJECT COST $79,789.88 EXHIBIT C CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM: /9 ORDINANCE NO. 371 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO A HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION CASE NO.: ZONE CHANGE 2002-106 APPLICANT: CLUB HOUSE ASSOCIATES L.L.C. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 16th day of April, 2002, hold a duly -noticed and continued said Public Hearing to the 41h day of June, 2002 to consider the request of Clubhouse Associates, L. L.C. for a Zone Change to the City of La Quinta Zoning Map designated as Low Density Residential (LDR) and to replace it with a High Density Residential (RH) designation; as shown on Exhibit A. ;and more particularly described as: A.P.N. 772-300-002 and 772-300-003; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 26th day March, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing and continued said Public Hearing to the 23'd day of April and subsequently continued said Public Hearing to the 14th day May to consider the request of Clubhouse Associates, L. L.C. for said Zone Change. WHEREAS, at said City Council Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts and reasons to justify the approval of said Zone Change. 1. This Zone Change is consistent the 2002 General Plan Update, in that the Zone Change categories proposed are consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies in the General Plan. 2. The Zone Change is suitable and appropriate for the property because it is adjacent to and compatible with a planned neighborhood commercial center, a planned residential development, and takes access off a Major Arterial road. SECTION 1. The official Zoning Map for the City of La Quinta is hereby amended for those areas shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of the this Ordinance. 192 Ordinance No. 371 Change of Zone 2002-106 Clubhouse Apartments, L.LC. Adopted June 4, 2002 Page 2 SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL. Said Zoning Change request determination that no significant environmental impacts which cannot be mitigated will result from this project. Therefore, no further Environmental Assessment is necessary pursuant to Public Resources code 15162 from the Guidelines for Implementation for the California Environmental Quality Act. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4: POSTING. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council, held on this 18th day of June, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) 193 Ordinance No. 371 Change of Zone 2002-106 Clubhouse Apartments, L.LC. Adopted June 4, 2002 Page 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 1.94 EXHIBIT A J 14 k Avenue 52 ,. B-Jw PROJECT LOCATION I CASE MAP CASE No. ZONE CHANGE 2002-106 NORTH SCALE: NTS 19 T44 4 XP Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Approval of Establishing a Fund for Accounting Purposes Only for the Coachella Valley Violent Crime Task Force RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: C;)-0 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve the establishment of a fund for accounting purposes only for the Coachella Valley Violent Crime Task Force FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Staff time of $1,000 per year is estimated to process transactions related to the Task Force and prepare a monthly report. All other costs for the Task Force would be paid through contributions or grants obtained from its members. No additional appropriations are anticipated through this action. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. The Coachella Valley Violent Crime Task Force was formed to address gang related activity on a multi -jurisdictional basis. It is comprised of representatives from several of the Valley cities, (at this time La Quinta, Indio, Palm Springs, Desert Hot Springs), County probation, the Department of Justice and the District Attorney's office. The salaries of the individuals on the task force are paid directly by the jurisdiction that they represent, however other expenses such as office supplies, training and special equipment are paid for through grants obtained by the County for the Task Force. Captain Horton has been selected by his fellow Chiefs to act as the Chairman of the Board for the Task Force, and he has in turn requested the City to assist by providing accounting services for the program. Services would primarily consist of receiving and tracking revenues and processing invoices approved by the Task Force Board. In order to provide the aforementioned services, it is necessary to set up the appropriate fund and accounts in the City's accounting system. 196 G APOLICE\GangAcctng. wpd Alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the establishment of a fund for accounting purposes only for the Coachella Valley Violent Crime Task Force; or 2. Do not approve the establishment of a fund for accounting purposes only for the Coachella Valley Violent Crime Task Force; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Tom Hartung Director of Building and Safety Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese City Manager 197 GAPOLICE\GangAcctng.wpd 002 M COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 Adoption of a Resolution of the City Council Waiving Protest Proceedings Relating to Annexation No. 13 to the City of La Quinta RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council Waiving Protest Proceedings Relating to Annexation No. 13 to the City of La Quinta. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: LAFCO will be conducting their agency hearing on June 27, 2002 regarding LAFCO Case No. 2002-04-4 (La Quinta Annexation No. 13) for that area between Avenue 58, Avenue 60, Madison Street and Monroe Street (part of Coral Mountain). The applicant has received letters of support from all property owners within the boundaries of the annexation and pursuant to Cortese -Knox -Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, LAFCO can waive the protest hearing provided the City consents to the waiver in writing. Staff has drafted the attached Resolution providing the written waiver. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council Waiving Protest Proceedings Relating to Annexation No. 13 to the City of La Quinta; or G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\Annex13Waiver.wpd 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council Waiving Protest Proceedings Relating to Annexation No. 13 to the City of La Quinta; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, ry Hermbirl ' mmunitV Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Letters of support 199 lf'? G:\WPDOCS\CC SO Rpts\Annex13Waiver.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA WAIVING PROTEST PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO ANNEXATION NO. 13 TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA ANNEXATION #13 - CORAL MOUNTAIN WHEREAS, the owners of the affected property wish to make application to the Riverside county Local Area Formation Commission ("LAFCO") for the annexation of certain parcels of unincorporated territory as shown on Exhibit "1 " attached hereto; and, WHEREAS, the proposed annexation territory, known as "Annexation No. 13-Coral Mountain, located between Avenue 58, Avenue 60, Madison Street and Monroe Street" is a 640 acre site; and, WHEREAS, the proposed annexation territory is uninhabited within the meaning of California Government Code Section 56046; and, WHEREAS, the property owners of 100% of the property comprising the annexation territory have given their written consent to the annexation; and WHEREAS, the owners of the affected property and the City of La Quinta desire that the annexation be completed in the shortest possible time period; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 56663(c)(2) provides for a waiver of conducting authority proceedings provided that inter alia. "...all affected local agencies that will gain or lose territory as a result of the change of organization or reorganization have consented in writing to a waiver of protest proceedings." NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California as follows: 1. The City of La Quinta pursuant to Government Code Section 56663(c)(2) does hereby consent to a waiver of protest proceedings in connection with Annexation No. 13 for the purpose of expediting LAFCO application. 200 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CoralMtWestLAFCOWaiver.wpd J `` 3 Resolution 2001- Annexation #13 - Coral Mountain Waiver of Protest Proceedings Adopted: June 18, 2002 PASSES, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 18th day of June, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 201 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\CoraiMtWestLAFCOWaiver.wpd ,)04 Al / L j ■ . r- k © 2 \ < f ) / 7 M � \ £ e w q / \ k a. § § $ r- Ef 2 x x x x x x x �� v I2 § LL ■ CD] % co \ § k m K 2 � § § 2 k'/ d § E 6 / k S ! $_ m§ § a \ ) § ] & 2 / S % _ ¥ M ( \ K / k / ( \ J 2 _j� « ( t / c m I £ K 2 §° k§■ m 2 8§ J K a m A « 7 Q&� m 2 e @ a ■ ) 4 w ) k CL w & 20 ■ \ iE C k § k 2 a m \ C 2 f J $ 2 m § m cm - d 9 ) m m© q m 9 o R g LO m- L- ¥ « - 'It o W to N � d Coq n i � a % $ § n \ $ $ L \ \ \ § ca 0 § � I 2� � UUI � George Spiliotis, Executive Director LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION, RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1485 Spruce Street, Suite J Riverside, CA 92507-2445 SUBJECT: ANNEXATION #13 to the CITY OF LA QUINTA/LAFCO 20024K 4 Dear Mr. Spiliotis: We are owners of property within the referenced annexation. Please admowledge our consent for the annexation as proposed. Sincerely, AMark,.F�q�� Date 2637 Sausalito Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92006 APN 764-180-001 LL--/�2/G 6g/LrvRva� 14'" L To �-��s P�P.vPf2Tl r / - 203 George Spiliotis, Executive Director LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION, RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1485 Spruce Street, Suite J Riverside, CA 92507-2445 SUBJECT: ANNEXATION #13 to the CITY OF LA QUINTAILAFCO 2002494 Dear Mr. Spiliotis: We are owners of property within the referenced annexation. Please acknowledge our consent for the annexation as proposed. Sincerely, .. ..P. •V. - - .• • APN :000 .5-i7 s7 G o a c4e-'� 0 97-y-56 -f Zj vL Date 204 08 George Spiliotis, Executive Director LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION, RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1485 Spruce Street, Suite J Riverside, CA 92507-2445 SUBJECT: ANNEXATION #13 to the CITY OF LA QUINTA/LAFCO 2002-04-4 Dear Mr. Spiliotis: We are owners of property within the referenced annexation. Please acknowledge our consent for the annexation as proposed. Sincerely, - ' - Scanlon, Carol Ar ,.dov. Date 4140 Warner Blvd., #114 Burbank, CA 91505 APN 764-180-003 205 1A 01/30/2bb1 10:1d 1blyLabL�rJ VO/V/. 4Vuc aO. V' rHVC ul George Spilictis, Executive Director LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION, RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1485 Spruce Street. Suite J Riverside, CA 82507-2445 SUBJECT: ANNEXATION #13 to the CITY OF LA QUINTAfL.AFCo 2002-04-4 Dear Mr Spiliotis Ws are owners of property within the referenced annexation, plmse acknowledge our oonsent for the annexation as proposed Sincerely. Duarte, ,loac{uln Side and peon, Jessica Flores 83295 Airport Blvd. Thermal, CA 92274 APN 764-180-004 APN T64-180-005 r_- b-I(_o2- Date 206 k/ L George Spiliotis, Executive Director LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION, RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1485 Spruce Street, Suite J Riverside, CA 92507-2445 SUBJECT: ANNEXATION #13 to the CITY OF LA QUINTA/LAFCO 20024 Dear Mr. Spiliotis: We are owners of property within the referenced annexation. Please acknoy4edge qHr consent for the annexation as proposed. Sincerely, .Iac� i�l�e D e r8OO7 Monroe Street Thermal, CA 92274 APN 764-180-006 207 George Spiliotis, Executive Director LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION, RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1485 Spruce Street, Suite J Riverside, CA 92507-2445 SUBJECT: ANNEXATION #13 to the CITY OF LA QUINTA4-AFCO 2002-04-4 Dear Mr. Spiliotis: We are owners of property within the referenced annexation. Please acknowledge our consent for the annexation as proposed. Sincerely, V40e; - o"/ C R om(i + M k:L -DR U6 A V Date 81.773 Avenue 58 -t-P Qu= NTT CA g7153 APN 764-190-001 208 FROM : SHIRLEY HAMMER PHONE NO. : 760 323 5745 Jun. 06 2002 02:13PM P1 -�H- George Spiliolfis, Executive Director LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION, RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1485 spruce Street, Suits J Riverside, CA 92607-2445 SUBJECT: ANNEXATION *13 tv the Gr7y OF LA QUINTAILAFCO 2002-04.4 Dear Mr. Spillotis: We are owners of property withir, the referenoed annexation. Please ackmWedge our consent for the annexation as proposed•. - Sincerely, Harrrrrer, Joe date 677 N. Dry Its Road Palm Springs, CA 92282 APN 764-190.002.003; 004, 005. 006 P�n9 t 113 fk O d r JAW .. L Ilk 1 a r °"hT© W n C/1 CD 1— N W Z O d am - O rrco 0 O � Z ocs a 0 rrco O � O 1 / p � v e[o i ON i T-il4t 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: / COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Investment Policy of the City of La Quinta for Fiscal Year 2002/2003 RECOMMENDATION: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving the Investment Policy of the City of La Quinta for Fiscal Year 2002/2003. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: SB564 imposes certain reporting requirements on State and local agencies. Specifically, the bill requires, in part, that the treasurer of a local agency submit an annual statement of investment policy to the legislative body. As a result of this reporting requirement, in March of 2002, the Investment Advisory Board (IAB) began the process of updating the City's Investment Policy to conform with this legislative requirement. On June 12, 2002, the Investment Advisory Board met with the City Manager, City Attorney and City Treasurer to review the proposed Investment Policy. The proposed Investment Policy redline form is included as Attachment 1. 213 At their June 12, 2002 meeting, the IAB voted, by a 4-0-2 vote (Ayes: Board Members Felice, Moulin, Osborne and Chairman Mahfoud, Noes: None, Absent:, Board Members Lewis and Olander), to submit the proposed Investment Policy to the City Council for consideration. The Investment Advisory Board has spent the last four months working on the City Investment Policy. The general purpose of the City's Investment Policy is to provide the rules and standards the City must follow when investing the City of La Quinta's public funds. It is the policy of the City of La Quinta to invest all public funds in a manner which will provide a diversified portfolio with maximum security while meeting daily cash flow demands and the highest investment return in conformity with all State and local statutes. This Policy applies to all cash and investments of the City of La Quinta, La Quinta Redevelopment Agency and the La Quinta Financing Authority, hereafter referred to as the "City." The primary objectives, in order of priority, of the City of La Quinta's investment activity shall be: • Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments of the City of La Quinta shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. • The investment portfolio shall remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements that may be reasonably anticipated. • The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return or yield throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. • Within the constraints of safety, liquidity and yield, the City will endeavor to maintain a diversified portfolio by allocating assets between different types of investments within policy limitations. It is understood that all investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, by persons with prudence, discretion, and intelligence acting as they would in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, as well as considering the probable safety of their capital and the probable income to be derived. As noted in the policy, authority to manage the City of La Quinta's investment portfolio is 21.1 derived from the City Ordinance. Management responsibility for the investment program is delegated to the City Treasurer, who shall establish and implement written procedures for the operation of the City's investment program consistent with the Investment Policy. The Treasurer is required to establish and implement a system of internal controls to maintain the safety of the portfolio. The internal control system will also ensure the timely preparation and accurate reporting of the portfolio financial information. As part of the annual audit of the City of La Quinta's financial statements, the independent auditor reviews the adequacy of those controls and advises the City if weaknesses are found. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving the Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2002/2003; or 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council with changes approving the Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2002/2003; or 3. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving the Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2002/2003; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, bhn M. Falcoher inance Director/Treasurer Approved for submission by: 'D Thomas P. Genovese City Manager Attachments: 1. Redline Copy of Proposed Investment Policy 217, � 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE AMENDED INVESTMENT POLICY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003 WHEREAS, the general purpose of the Investment Policy is to provide the rules and standards users must follow in investing funds of the City of La Quinta; and WHEREAS, the primary objectives, in order of priority, of the City of La Quinta's investment activity shall be: Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments of the City of La Quinta shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. The investment portfolio shall remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements that may be reasonably anticipated. The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return or yield throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. WHEREAS, authority to manage the City of La Quinta's investment portfolio is derived from the City Ordinance. Management responsibility for the investment program is delegated to the City Treasurer, who shall establish and implement written procedures for the operation of the City's investment program consistent with the Investment Policy; and WHEREAS, the Investment Policy will be adopted before the end of June of each year and amended as considered necessary; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta to adopt the 2002/2003 Fiscal Year Investment Policy (Exhibit A). 216 o,!O4 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this day of 2002 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: KATHY JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California City of La uinta Investment Policy Fiscal Year 2002-2003 218 CITY OF LA QUINTA Investment Policy Table of Contents Section Topic Executive Summary I General Purpose II Investment Policy III Scope IV Objectives ► Safety ► Liquidity ► Yield ► Diversified Portfolio V Maximum Maturities VI Prudence VII Delegation of Authority Vill Conflict of Interest IX Authorized Financial Dealers and Institutions ► Broker/Dealers ► Financial Institutions X Authorized Investments and Limitations XI Investment Pools XII Safekeeping and Custody XIII Interest Earning Distribution Policy XIV Internal Controls and Independent Auditors XV Benchmark XVI Reporting Standards XVII Investment of Bond Proceeds XVIII Investment Advisory Board - City of La Quinta IX Investment Policy Adoption Appendices: A. Summary of Authorized Investments and Limitations B. Municipal Code Ordinance 2.70 - Investment Advisory Board C. Municipal Code Ordinance 3.08 - Investment of Moneys and Funds D. Segregation of Major Investment Responsibilities E. Listing of Approved Financial Institutions F. Broker/Dealer Questionnaire and Certification G. Investment Pool Questionnaire H. Glossary 1 Page 2 5 5 5 6 7 7 8 8 8 10 13 14 14 14 16 16 17 17 17 19 20 21 23 24 25 30 34 219 City of La Quinta Investment Policy Executive Summary The general purpose of this Investment Policy is to provide the rules and standards users must follow in investing funds of the City of La Quinta. It is the policy of the City of La Quinta to invest all public funds in a manner which will provide a diversified portfolio with maximum security while meeting daily cash flow demands and the highest investment return in conformity to all state and local statutes. This Policy applies to all cash and investments of the City of La Quinta, La Quinta Redevelopment Agency and the La Quinta Financing Authority, hereafter referred in this document as the "City". The primary objectives, in order of priority, of the City of La Quinta's investment activity shall be: Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments of the City of La Quinta shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio The investment portfolio shall remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements that may be reasonably anticipated. The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return or yield throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. Within the constraints of safety, liquidity and yield, the City will endeavor to maintain a diversified portfolio by allocating assets between different types of investments within policy limitations. Investments shall be made with judgment and care - under circumstances then prevailing - which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. 2 220 Authority to manage the City of La Quinta's investment portfolio is derived from the City Ordinance. Management responsibility for the investment program is delegated to the City Treasurer, who shall establish and implement written procedures for the operation of the City's investment program consistent with the Investment Policy. The Treasurer shall establish and implement a system of internal controls to maintain the safety of the portfolio. In addition, the internal control system will also insure the timely preparation and accurate reporting of the portfolio financial information. As part of the annual audit of the City of La Quinta's financial statements the independent auditor reviews the adequacy of those controls and comments if weaknesses are found. Investment responsibilities carry added duties of insuring that investments are made without improper influence or the appearance to a reasonable person of questionable or improper influence. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy maintains a listing of financial institutions which are approved for investment purposes. All Broker/Dealers and financial institutions selected by the Treasurer to provide investment services will be approved by the City Manager subject to City Council approval. The Treasurer will be permitted to invest only in City approved investments up to the maximum allowable percentages or dollar limitations and, where applicable, through the bid process requirements. Authorized investment vehicles and related maximum portfolio positions are listed in Appendix A - Summary of Authorized Investments and Limitations At least two bids will be required of investments in the authorized investment vehicles. Collateral ization will be required for Certificates of Deposits in excess of $100,000. Collateral will always be held by an independent third party from the institution that sells the Certificates of Deposit to the City. Evidence of compliance with State Collateral ization policies must be supplied to the City and retained by the City Treasurer. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy shall require that each individual investment have a maximum maturity of two years unless specific approval is authorized by the City Council, except the projected annual dollar amount as detailed in Section V, may be invested in U.S. Treasury bills, notes and bonds maturing between 2 and 5 years. In addition, the City's investment in the State Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is allowable as long as the average maturity does not exceed two years, unless specific approval is authorized by the City Council. The City's investment in Money Market Mutual funds is allowable as long as the average maturity does not exceed 60 days. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy will use the six-month U.S. Treasury Bill as a benchmark when measuring the performance of the investment portfolio. 221 3 The Investment Policies shall be adopted by resolution of the La Quinta City Council on an annual basis. The Investment Policies will be adopted before the end of June of each year. This Executive Summary is an overall review of the City of La Quinta Investment Policies. Reading this summary does not constitute a complete review, which can only be accomplished by reviewing all the pages. 4 222 P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 City of La Quinta Statement of Investment Policy July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003 Adopted by the City Council on June 18, 2002 GENERAL PURPOSE (760) 777-7000 FAX (760) 777-7101 The general purpose of this document is to provide the rules and standards users must follow in administering the City of La Quinta cash investments. II INVESTMENT POLICY It is the policy of the City of La Quinta to invest public funds in a manner which will provide a diversified portfolio with safety of principal as the primary objective while meeting daily cash flow demands with the highest investment return. In addition, the Investment Policy will conform to all State and local statutes governing the investment of public funds. This Investment Policy applies to all cash and investments of the City of La Quinta, City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency and the City of La Quinta Financing Authority, hereafter referred in this document as the "City". These funds are reported in the City of La Quinta Comprehensive Annual financial Report (CAFR) and include: All funds within the following fund types: ► General ► Special Revenue ► Capital Projects ► Debt Service ► Internal Service ► Trust and Agency ► Any new fund types and fund(s) that may be created. 22% X Mrs IV OBJECTIVES The primary objective, in order of priority, of the City of La Quinta's investment activity shall be: 1. Safety Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments of the City of La Quinta shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio in accordance with the permitted investments. The objective will be to mitigate credit risk and interest rate risk. A. Credit Risk Credit Risk - is the risk of loss due to the failure of the security issuer or backer. Credit risk may be mitigated by: ► Limiting investments to the safest types of securities; ► Pre -qualifying the financial institutions, and broker/dealers, which the City of La Quinta will do business; and ► Diversifying the investment portfolio so that potential losses on individual securities will be minimized. B. Interest Rate Risk Interest Rate risk is the risk that the market value of securities in the portfolio will fall due to changes in general interest rates. Interest rate risk may be mitigated by: ► Structuring the investment portfolio so that securities mature to meet cash requirements for ongoing operations, thereby avoiding the need to sell securities on the open market prior to maturity; and ► By investing operating funds primarily in shorter -term securities. 2. Liquidity The investment portfolio shall remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements that may be reasonably anticipated. This is accomplished by structuring the portfolio so that sufficient liquid funds are available to meet anticipated demands. Furthermore since all possible cash demands cannot be anticipated the portfolio should be diversified and consist of securities with active secondary or resale markets. Securities shall not be sold prior to maturity with the following exceptions: 6 2,24 ► A declining credit quality security could be sold early to minimize loss of principal; ► Liquidity needs of the portfolio require that the security be sold. 3. Yield The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. Return on investment is of least importance compared to the safety and liquidity objectives described above. The core of investments are limited to relatively low risk securities in anticipation of earning a fair return relative to the risk being assumed 4. Diversified Portfolio Within the constraints of safety, liquidity and yield, the City will endeavor to maintain a diversified portfolio by allocating assets between different types of investments within policy limitations. V MAXIMUM MATURIT/ES ft is the policy of the City of La Quinta to hold securities and other investments of cash in financial instruments until maturity, thus avoiding the risk that the market value on investments fluctuates with overall market interest rates. The hold until maturity policy shall not prevent the sale of a security to minimize foss of principal when the issuer or backer suffers declining credit worthiness. The hold until maturity policy requires that the City of La Quinta's investment portfolio is structured so that sufficient funds are available from maturing investments and other sources to meet anticipated cash needs. To meet anticipated cash needs, it is essential that the Treasurer have reasonably accurate, diligently prepared cash flow projections. Annually, the Treasurer shall project the amount of funds not expected to be disbursed within five years. For FV 2002103, the amount of such funds was $ 10 million. Funds up to that amount may be invested in U.S. Treasury bills, notes and bonds maturing between 2 and 5 years. For all other funds, investments are limited to two years maximum maturity. VI PRUDENCE The City shall follow the Uniform Prudent Investor Act as adopted by the State of California in Probate Code Sections 16045 through 16054. Section 16053 sets forth the terms of a prudent person which are as follows: Investments shall be made with judgment and care - under circumstances then prevailing - which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence excerise in tht25 7 professional management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. VII DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY Authority to manage the City of La Quinta's investment portfolio is derived from the City Ordinance. Management responsibility for the investment program is delegated to the City Treasurer, who shall establish written procedures for the operation of the investment program consistent with the Investment Policy. Procedures should include reference to safekeeping, wire transfer agreements, banking service contracts, and collateral/depository agreements. Such procedures shall include explicit delegation of authority to persons responsible for investment transactions. No person may engage in an investment transaction except as provided under the terms of this Investment Policy and the procedures established by the City Treasurer. The City Treasurer shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken and shall establish a system of controls to regulate the activities of subordinate officials. The City Manager or Assistant City Manager shall approve in writing all purchases and sales of investments prior to their execution by the City Treasurer. VIII CONFLICT OF INTEREST Investment responsibilities carry added duties of insuring that investments are made without improper influence or the appearance of improper influence. Therefore, the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, and the City Treasurer shall adhere to the State of California Code of Economic Interest and to the following: ► The City Manager, Assistant City Manager, and the City Treasurer shall not personally or through a close relative maintain any accounts, interest, or private dealings with any firm with which the City places investments, with the exception of regular savings, checking and money market accounts, or other similar transactions that are offered on a non-negotiable basis to the general public. Such accounts shall be disclosed annually to the City Clerk in conjunction with annual disclosure statements of economic interest. ► All persons authorized to place or approve investments shall report to the City Clerk kinship relations with principal employees of firms with which the City places investments. IX AUTHORIZED FINANCIAL DEALERS AND INSTITUTIONS The City of La Quinta Investment Policy maintains a listing of financial institutions which are approved for investment purposes. In addition a list will also be maintained of approved broker/dealers selected by credit worthiness, who maintain an office in the State of California. 8 226 1. Broker/Dealers who desire to become bidders for investment transactions must supply the City of La Quinta with the following: ► Current audited financial statements ► Proof of National Association of Security Dealers Certification ► Trading resolution ► Proof of California registration ► Resume of Financial broker ► Completion of the City of La Quinta Broker/Dealer questionnaire which contains a certification of having read the City of La Quinta Investment Policy The City Treasurer shall evaluate the documentation submitted by the broker/dealer and independently verify existing reports on file for any firm and individual conducting investment related business. The City Treasurer will also contact the following agencies during the verification process: ► National Association of Security Dealer's Public Disclosure Report File - 1-800-289-9999 ► State of California Department of Corporations 1-916-445-3062 All Broker/Dealers selected by the City Treasurer to provide investment services will be approved by the City Manager subject to City Council approval. The City Attorney will perform a legal review of the trading resolution/investment contract submitted by each Broker/Dealer. Each securities dealer shall provide monthly and quarterly reports filed pursuant to U.S. Treasury Department regulations. Each mutual fund shall provide a prospectus and statement of additional information. 2. Financial Institutions will be required to meet the following criteria in order to receive City funds for deposit or investment: A. Insurance - Public Funds shall be deposited only in financial institutions having accounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) B. Collateral - The amount of City of La Quinta deposits or investments not insured by the FDIC -shall be 1 10% collateralized by securities' or 150% mortgages' market values of that amount of invested funds plus unpaid interest earnings. C. Disclosure - Each financial institution maintaining invested funds in excess of the FDIC insured amount shall furnish the City a copy of the most recent Annual Call Report. 9 227 Bank (FFCB), Federal Land Bank (FLB) and Federal Intermediate Credit Bank (FICB) are such issuers. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy has a limitation of -$-3 $5 million per issuer. • Federal government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) issuing securities not backed as to principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. These GSEs include Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) and Student Loan Marketing Association (SLMA) which are publicly owned. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy has a limitation of $5 million for FNMA, $5 million for FHLMC , and $3 million for SLMA. Bankers' Acceptances - As authorized in Government Code Section 53601 (f), 40% of the portfolio may be invested in Bankers' Acceptances, although no more than 30% of the portfolio may be invested in Bankers' Acceptances with any one commercial bank. Additionally, the maturity period cannot exceed 180 days. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investment in Bankers' Acceptances. Commercial Paper - As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(g), 15% of the portfolio may be invested in commercial paper of the highest rating (A-1 or P-1) as rated by Moody's or Standard and Poor's, with maturities not to exceed 270 days. This percentage may be increased to 30% if the dollar weighted average maturity does not exceed 31 days. There are a number of other qualifications regarding investments in commercial paper based on the financial strength of the corporation and the size of the investment. The City of La Quinta's Investment Policy follows The Government Code with the following additional limitations: (1) maximum maturity per issue of 90 days and (2) a maximum of -$-2 3 million per issuer. Negotiable Certificates of Deposit - As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(h), 30% of the portfolio may be invested in negotiable certificates of deposit issued by commercial banks and savings and loan associations. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investment in Negotiable Certificates of Deposit. Repurchase and Reverse Repurchase Agreements - As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(i), these investment vehicles are agreements between the local agency and seller for the purchase of government securities to be resold at a specific date and for a specific amount. Repurchase agreements are generally used for short term investments varying from one day to two weeks. There is no legal limitation on the amount of the repurchase agreement. However, the maturity period cannot exceed one year. The market value of securities underlying a repurchase agreement shall be at least 102% of the funds invested and shall be valued at least quarterly. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investment in Repurchase Agreements. 228 11 The City shall not invest in excess of the FDIC insured amount in banking institutions which do not disclose to the city a current listing of securities pledged for collateralization in public monies. X AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS AND LIMITATIONS The City Treasurer will be permitted to invest in the investments summarized in the Appendix A. I. STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND CITY OF LA QUINTA LIMITATIONS As provided in Sections 16429.1, 53601, 53601.1, and 53649 of the Government Code, the State of California limits the investment vehicles available to local agencies as summarized in the following paragraphs. Section 53601, as now amended, provides that unless Section 53601 specifies a limitation on an investment's maturity, no investments with maturities exceeding five years shall be made. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy has specified that no investment may exceed two years, except the projected annual dollar amount, as detailed in Section V, may be invested in U.S. Treasury bills, notes and bonds maturing between 2 and 5 years. State Treasurer's Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) - As authorized in Government Code Section 16429.1 and by LAIF procedures, local government agencies are each authorized to invest a maximum of $30- 40 million per account in this investment program administered by the California State Treasurer. The City's investment in the State Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is allowable as long as the average maturity of its investment portfolio does not exceed two years, unless specific approval is authorized by the City Council. The City of La Quinta has two accounts with LAIF. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy has a limitation of 20% of the portfolio. U.S. Government and Related Issues - As authorized in Government Code Sections 53601 (a) through (n) as they pertain to surplus funds, this category includes a wide variety of government securities which include the following: • Local government bonds or other indebtedness and State bonds or other indebtedness. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investments in local and state indebtedness • U.S. Treasury bills, notes and bonds and Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) securities directly issued and backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy limits investments in U.S. Treasury issues and GNMA to 100% of the portfolio. • U.S. Government instrumentalities and agencies issuing securities not backed as to principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. The Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), Federal Farm Credit 10 22^ Bank (FFCB), Federal Land Bank (FLB) and Federal Intermediate Credit Bank (FICB) are such issuers. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy has a limitation of k3 $5 million per issuer. • Federal government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) issuing securities not backed as to principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. These GSEs include Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) and Student Loan Marketing Association (SLMA) which are publicly owned. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy has a limitation of $5 million for FNMA, $5 million for FHLMC , and $3 million for SLMA. Bankers' Acceptances - As authorized in Government Code Section 53601 (f), 40% of the portfolio may be invested in Bankers' Acceptances, although no more than 30% of the portfolio may be invested in Bankers' Acceptances with any one commercial bank. Additionally, the maturity period cannot exceed 180 days. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investment in Bankers' Acceptances. Commercial Paper - As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(g), 15% of the portfolio may be invested in commercial paper of the highest rating (A-1 or P-1) as rated by Moody's or Standard and Poor's, with maturities not to exceed 270 days. This percentage may be increased to 30% if the dollar weighted average maturity does not exceed 31 days. There are a number of other qualifications regarding investments in commercial paper based on the financial strength of the corporation and the size of the 'investment. The City of La Quinta's Investment Policy follows The Government Code with the following additional limitations: (1) maximum maturity per issue of 90 days and (2) a maximum of -$-2 3 million per issuer. Negotiable Certificates of Deposit - As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(h), 30% of the portfolio may be invested in negotiable certificates of deposit issued by commercial banks and savings and loan associations. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investment in Negotiable Certificates of Deposit. Repurchase and Reverse Repurchase Agreements - As authorized in Government Code Section 53601(i), these investment vehicles are agreements between the local agency and seller for the purchase of government securities to be resold at a specific date and for a specific amount. Repurchase agreements are generally used for short term investments varying from one day to two weeks. There is no legal limitation on the amount of the repurchase agreement. However, the maturity period cannot exceed one year. The market value of securities underlying a repurchase agreement shall be at least 102% of the funds invested ,and shall be valued at least quarterly. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investment in Repurchase Agreements. 11 The term "reverse repurchase agreement" means the sale of securities by the local agency pursuant to an agreement by which the local agency will repurchase such securities on or before a specific date and for a specific amount. As provided in Government Code Section 53635, reverse repurchase agreements require the prior approval of the City Council. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investment in Reverse Repurchase Agreements. Corporate Notes - As authorized in Government Code Section 53601 (j), local agencies may invest in corporate notes for a maximum period of five years in an amount not to exceed 30% of the agency's portfolio. The notes must be issued by corporations organized and operating in the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any other state and operating in the United States. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investment in corporate notes. Diversified Management Companies - As authorized in Government Code Section 53601 (k), local agencies are authorized to invest in shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies (mutual funds) in an amount not to exceed 20% of the agency's portfolio. There are a number of other qualifications and restrictions regarding allowable investments in corporate notes and shares of beneficial interest issued by mutual funds which include (1) attaining the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided by not less than two of the three largest nationally recognized rating services, or (2) having an investment advisor registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years' experience investing in the securities and obligations and with assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). The City of La Quinta Investment Policy only allows investments in mutual funds that are money market funds maintaining a par value of $1 per share that invests in direct issues of the U.S. Treasury and/or US Agency Securities with an average maturity of their portfolio not exceeding 90 days and the City limits such investments to 20% of the portfolio. Mortgage -Backed Securities - As authorized in Government code Section 53601(n), local agencies may invest in mortgage -backed securities such as mortgage pass -through securities and collateralized mortgage obligations for a maximum period of five years in an amount not to exceed 20% of the agency's portfolio. Securities eligible for investment shall have a "A" or higher rating. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investment in Mortgage - Backed Securities. Financial Futures and Financial Option Contracts - As authorized in Government Code Section 53601.1, local agencies may invest in financial futures or option contracts in any of the above investment categories subject to the same overall portfolio limitations. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investments in financial futures and financial option contracts. 231 12 Certificates of Deposit - As authorized in Government Code Section 53649, Certificates of Deposit are fixed term investments which are required to be collateralized from 1 10% to 150% depending on the specific security pledged as collateral in accordance with Government Code Section 53652. There are no portfolio limits on the amount or maturity for this investment vehicle. Collateral ization will be required for Certificates of Deposits in excess of the FDIC insured amount. The type of collateral is limited to City authorized investments. Collateral will always be held by an independent third party from the institution that sells the Certificates of Deposit to the City. Evidence of compliance with State Collateralization policies must be supplied to the City and retained by the City Treasurer as follows: 1. Certificates of Deposits Insured by the FDIC. The City Treasurer may waive collateral ization of a deposit that is federally insured. 2. Certificates of Deposit in excess of FDIC Limits. The amount not federally insured shall be 1 10% collateralized securities or 150% mortgages market value of that amount of invested funds plus unpaid interest earnings. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy limits the percentage of Certificates of Deposit to 60% of the portfolio. Sweep Accounts - As authorized by the City Council, a U.S. Treasury and/or U.S. Agency Securities Money Market Sweep Account with a $50,000 target balance may be maintained in conjunction with the checking account. Derivatives - The City of La Quinta Investment Policy does not allow investment in derivatives. XI INVESTMENT POOLS There are three (3) types of investment pools: 1) state -run pools, 2) pools that are operated by a political subdivision where allowed by law and the political subdivision is the trustee i.e. County Pool; and 3) pools that are operated for profit by third parties. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy has authorized investment with the State of California's Treasurers Office Local Agency Investment Fund commonly referred to as LAIF. LAIF was organized in 1977 through State Legislation Section 16429.1, 2 and 3. Each LAIF account is restricted to a maximum investable limit of $30 40 million. In addition, LAIF will provide quarterly market value information to the City of La Quinta. On an annual basis the City Treasurer will submit the Investment Pool Questionnaire to LAIF. 23 ^ 13 Also, prior to opening any new Investment Pool account, which would require City Council approval, the City Treasurer will require the completion of the Investment Pool Questionnaire. The City does not allow investments with any other Investment Pool - County Pools or Third Party Pools. XII SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY All security transactions of the City of La Quinta Investment Policy shall be conducted on a delivery - versus payment (DVP) basis. Securities will be held by a third party custodian designated by the City Treasurer and evidenced by safekeeping receipts. Deposits and withdrawals of money market mutual funds and LAIF shall be made directly to the entity and not to an investment advisor, broker or dealer. Money market mutual funds and LAIF shall also operate on a DVP basis to be considered for investment. XIII INTEREST EARNING DISTRIBUTION POLICY Interest earnings is generated from pooled investments and specific investments. 1. Pooled Investments - It is the general policy of the City to pool all available operating cash of the City of La Quinta, La Quinta Redevelopment Agency and La Quinta Financing Authority and allocate interest earnings, in the following order, as follows: A. Payment to the General Fund of an amount equal to the total annual bank service charges as incurred by the general fund for all operating funds as included in the annual operating budget. B. Payment to the General Fund of a management fee equal to 5% of the annual pooled cash fund investment earnings. C. Payment to each fund of an amount based on the average computerized daily cash balance included in the common portfolio for the earning period. 2. Specific Investments - Specific investments purchased by a fund shall incur all earnings and expenses to that particular fund. XIV INTERNAL CONTROLS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITOR The City Treasurer shall establish a system of internal controls to accomplish'the following objectives: ► Safeguard assets; ► The orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to management policies; 14 `.31 ► Prevention or detection of errors and fraud; ► The accuracy and completeness of accounting records; and, ► Timely preparation of reliable financial information. While no internal control system, however elaborate, can guarantee absolute assurance that the City's assets are safeguarded, it is the intent of the City's internal control to provide a reasonable assurance that management of the investment function meets the City's objectives. The internal controls shall address the following: a. Control of collusion. Collusion is a situation where two or more employees are working in conjunction to defraud their employer. b. Separation of transaction authority from accounting and record keeping. By separating the person who authorizes or performs the transaction from the people who record or otherwise account for the transaction, a separation of duties is achieved. C. Custodial safekeeping. Securities purchased from any bank or dealer including appropriate collateral (as defined by State Law) shall be placed with an independent third party for custodial safekeeping. d. Avoidance of physical delivery securities. Book entry securities are much easier to transfer and account for since actual delivery of a document never takes place. Delivered securities must be properly safeguarded against loss or destruction. The potential for fraud and loss increases with physically delivered securities. e. Clear delegation of authority to subordinate staff members. Subordinate staff members must have a clear understanding of their authority and responsibilities to avoid improper actions. Clear delegation of authority also preserves the internal control structure that is contingent on the various staff positions and their respective responsibilities as outlined in the Segregation of Major Investment Responsibilities appendices. f. Written confirmation or telephone transactions for investments and wire transfers. Due to the potential for error and improprieties arising from telephone transactions, all telephone transactions shall be supported by written communications and approved by the appropriate person. Written communications may be via fax if on letterhead and the safekeeping institution has a list of authorized signatures. Fax correspondence must be supported by evidence of verbal or written follow-up. g. Development of a wire transfer agreement with the City's bank and third party custodian. This agreement should outline the various controls, security provisions, and delineate responsibilities of each party making and receiving wire transfers. 15 ?34 The System of Internal Controls developed by the City, shall be reviewed annually by the independent auditor in connection with the annual audit of the City of La Quinta's Financial Statements. The independent auditor's management letter comments pertaining to cash and investments, if any, shall be directed to the City Manager who will direct the City Treasurer to provide a written response to the independent auditor's letter. The management letter comments pertaining to cash and investment activities and the City Treasurer's response shall be provided to the City's Investment Advisory Board for their consideration. Following the completion of each annual audit, the independent auditor shall meet with the Investment Advisory Board and discuss the auditing procedures performed and the review of internal controls for cash and investment activities. XV BENCHMARK The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of obtaining a rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles commensurate with the investment risk constraints and the cash flow needs of the City. Return on investment is of least importance compared to safety and liquidity objectives. The City of La Quinta Investment Policy will use the six month U.S. Treasury Bill as a benchmark when measuring the performance of the investment portfolio. XVI REPORTING STANDARDS SB564 section 3 requires a quarterly report to the Legislative Body of Investment activities. The City of La Quinta Investment Advisory Board has elected to report the investment activities to the City Council on a monthly basis through the Treasurers Report. AB 943 requires that the December 315t and June 30" Treasurers Reports be sent to the California Debt and Advisory Commission within sixty days of the end of the quarter. The City Treasurer shall submit a monthly Treasurers Report to the City Council and the Investment Advisory Board that includes all cash and investments under the authority of the Treasurer. The Treasurers Report shall summarize cash and investment activity and changes in balances and include the following: ► A certification by City Treasurer; ► A listing of Purchases and sales/maturities of investments; ► Cash and Investments categorized by authorized investments, except for LAIF which will be provided quarterly and show yield and maturity; ► Comparison of month end actual holdings to Investment Policy limitations; ► Current year and prior year monthly history of cash and investments for trend analysis; ► Balance Sheet; 16 23r ► Distribution of cash and investment balances by fund; ► A comparison of actual and surplus funds; ► A year to date historical cash flow analysis and projection for the next six months; ► A two-year list of historical interest rates. XVII INVESTMENT OF BOND PROCEEDS The City's Investment Policy shall govern bond proceeds and bond reserve fund investments. California Code Section 5922 (d) governs the investment of bond proceeds and reserve funds in accordance with bond indenture provisions which shall be structured in accordance with the City's Investment Policy. Arbitrage Requirement The US Tax Reform Act of 1986 requires the City to perform arbitrage calculations as required and return excess earnings to the US Treasury from investments of proceeds of bond issues sold after the effective date of this law. This arbitrage calculations may be contracted with an outside source to provide the necessary technical assistance to comply with this regulation. Investable funds subject to the 1986 Tax Reform Act will be kept segregated from other funds and records will be kept in a fashion to facilitate the calculations. The City's investment position relative to the new arbitrage restrictions is to continue pursuing the maximum yield on applicable investments while ensuring the safety of capital and liquidity. It is the City's position to continue maximization of yield and to rebate excess earnings, if necessary. XVIII INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD - CITY OF LA QUINTA The Investment Advisory Board (IAB) consists of seven members of the community that have been appointed by and report to the City Council. The IAB usually_meets on a monthly basis, but at least quarterly to (1) review at least annually the City's Investment Policy and recommend appropriate changes; (2) review monthly Treasury Report and note compliance with the Investment Policy and adequacy of cash and investments for anticipated obligations; (3) receive and consider other reports provided by the City Treasurer; (4) meet with the independent auditor after completion of the annual audit of the City's financial statements, and receive and consider the auditor's comments on auditing procedures, internal controls and findings far...,cash and investment activities, and; (5) serve as a resource for the City Treasurer on matters such as proposed investments, internal controls, use or change of financial institutions, custodians, brokers and dealers. The appendices include City of La Quinta Ordinance 2.70 entitled Investment Ad sory Board Provisions. IX INVESTMENT POLICY ADOPTION On an annual basis, the Investment policies will be initially reviewed by the Investment Advisory Board and the City Treasurer. The Investment Advisory Board will forward 17 the Investment policies, with any revisions, to the City Manager and City Attorney for their review and comment. A joint meeting will be held with the Investment Advisory Board, City Manager, City Attorney, and City Treasurer to review the Investment policies and comments, prior to submission to the City Council for their consideration. The Investment Policies shall be adopted by resolution of the City of La Quinta City Council on an annual basis. The Investment Policies will be adopted before the end of June of each year. AB 943 requires that the Investment Policies be sent to the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission within sixty days of a change to the Investment Policy. 18 237 Appendix A g A U U a I w �aa o � `a N �� m N : C C s u N, Y NNN N NN OI N N (1! Nrr O O O ppu Rx 1z O y W O O O S 3 N } C ��k O N 470 Q C YCC 8 a S a b a S a o aIL e it g g b o 0. ° Oct 8 8� s IL a ao8'q c,go�q 22MS SS 3x an a a a = 02 O pox b xS O ONNX Al xa b N pg (O Q � p a �a a � U. fkue LL 0 0 • : ° yy O..m� o�LL 2.10 1` L � VpO C = I Y a o C & O � LL 8 zu (L $=migi llE"JI5 ° ZS v LLLLLLLLLLLL �, � Fi f 0 f O N = lu x � o 0 01 a £R p Y Y O T r O a S � O JJJI o o s§ w 0 O ° N u 233 M 19 Appendix B Chapter 2.70 INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD PROVISIONS Sections: 2.70.010 General Rules Regarding Appointment. 2.70.020 Board meetings. 2.70.030 Board functions. 2.70.010 General rules regarding appointment A. Except as set out below, see Chapter 2.06 for General Provisions. B. The Investment Advisory Board (the "board") is a standing board composed of seven (7) members from the public that are appointed by city council. La Quinta residency is preferred, but not a requirement for board members. Recruitment for members may be advertised outside of the city". C. Background in the investment field and/or related experience is preferred. Background information will be required and potential candidates must agree to a background check and verification. D. On an annual basis, in conjunction with the Political Reform Act disclosure statutes, or at any time if a change in circumstances warrants, each board member will provide the City Council with a disclosure statement which identifies any matters that have a bearing on the appropriateness of that member's service on the board. Such matters may include, but are not limited to, changes in employment, changes in residence, or changes in clients. 2.70.020Board meetings. The Board usually will meet monthly, but this schedule may be extended to quarterly meetings upon the concurrence of the Board and the City Council. The specific meeting dates will be determined by the Board Members and meetings may be called for on an as needed basis. 2.70.030Board functions. 1. The principal functions of the Board are: (1) review at least annually the City's Investment Policy and recommend appropriate changes; (2) review monthly Treasury Report and note compliance with the Investment Policy and adequacy of cash and investments for anticipated obligations; (3) receive and consider other reports provided by the City Treasurer; (4) meet with the independent auditor after completion of the annual audit of the City's financial statements, and receive and consider the auditor's comments on auditing procedures, internal controls, and findings for cash and investment activities, and; (5) serve as a resource for the City Treasurer on matters such as proposed investments, internal controls, use or change of financial institutions, custodians, brokers and dealers. 2. The Board will report to the City Council after each meeting either in person or through correspondence at a regular City Council meeting. ?3P Appendix C Chapter 3.08 INVESTMENT OF MONEYS AND FUNDS Sections: 3.08.010 Investment of city moneys and deposit of securities. 3.08.020 Authorized investments. 3.08.030 Sales of securities. 3.08.040 City bonds. 3.08.050 Reports. 3.08.060 Deposits of securities. 3.08.070 Trust fund administration. 3.08.010 Investment of city moneys and deposit of securities. Pursuant to, and in accordance with, and to the extent allowed by, Sections 53607 and 53608 of the Government Code, the authority to invest and reinvest moneys of the city, to sell or exchange securities, and to deposit them and provide for their safekeeping, is delegated to the city treasurer. (Ord. 2 § 1 (part), 1982) 3.08.020 Authorized investments. Pursuant to the delegation of authority in Section 3.08.010, the city treasurer is authorized to purchase, at their original sale or after they have been issued, securities which are permissible investments under any provision of state law relating to the investing of general city funds, including but not limited to Sections 53601 and 53635 of the Government Code, as said sections now read or may hereafter be amended, from moneys in his custody which are not required for the immediate necessities of the city and as he may deem wise and expedient, and to sell or exchange for other eligible securities and reinvest the proceeds of the securities so purchased. (Ord. 2 § 1 (part), 1982) 3.08.030 Sales of Securities. From time to time the city treasurer shall sell the securities in which city moneys have been invested pursuant to this chapter, so that the proceeds may, as appropriate, be applied to the purchase for which the original purchase money may have been designated or placed in the city treasury. (Ord. 2 § I (part), 3.08.040 City bonds. Bonds issued by the city and purchased pursuant to this chapter may be canceled either in satisfaction of sinking fund obligations or otherwise if proper and appropriate; 21 r- 1 provided, however, that the bonds may be held uncancelled and while so held may be resold. (Ord. 2 § 1 (part), 1982) 3.08.050 Reports. The city treasurer shall make a monthly report to the city council of all investments made pursuant to the authority delegated in this chapter. (Ord. 2 § 1 (part), 1982) 3.08.060 Deposits of securities. Pursuant to the delegation of authority in Section 3.08.010, the city treasurer is authorized to deposit for safekeeping, the securities in which city moneys have been invested pursuant to this chapter, in any institution or depository authorized by the terms of any state law, including but not limited to Section 53608 of the Government Code as it now reads or may hereafter be amended. In accordance with said section, the city treasurer shall take from the institution or depository a receipt for the securities so deposited and shall not be responsible for the securities delivered to and receipted for by the institution or depository until they are withdrawn therefrom by the city treasurer. (Ord. 2 § 1 (part), 1982 3.08.070 Trust fund administration. Any departmental trust fund established by the city council pursuant to Section 36523 of the Government Code shall be administered by the city treasurer in accordance with Section 36523 and 26524 of the Government code and any other applicable provisions of law. (Ord. 2 § 1 (part), 1982) 22 241. Appendix D SEGREGATION OF MAJOR INVESTMENT RESPONSIBILITIES Function Responsibilities Develop formal Investment Policy City Treasurer Recommend modifications to Investment Policy Investment Advisory Board Review formal Investment Policy and recommend City Manager and City Council action City Attorney Adopt formal Investment Policy City Council Review Financial Institutions & Select Investments City Treasurer Approve investments City Manager or Assistant City Manager Execute investment transactions City Manager or Treasurer Confirm wires, if applicable City ManageF of Accounting Manager or Financial Services Assistant Record investment transactions in City's accounting records Accounting Manager or Financial Services Assistant Investment verification - match broker confirmation to City investment records Ar.Geunt Teohner.0an City Treasurer and Financial Services Assistant Reconcile investment records - to accounting records and bank statements Aerount Teehnkian Financial Services Assistant Reconcile investment records - to Treasurers Report of investments Aaeount Tee WG—ia ' Accounting Manager Security of investments at City Vault Security of investments Outside City Third Party Custodian Review internal control procedures External Auditor 23 24`' Appendix E LISTING OF APPROVED FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS 1. Banking Services - Wells Fargo Bank, Government Services, Los Angeles, California 2. Custodian Services Bank of New York, Los Angeles, California 3. Deferred Compensation - International City/County Management Association Retirement Corporation 4. Broker/Dealer Services - Merrill Lynch, Indian Wells, CA Morgan Stanley Dean ` itte-, Los Angeles, California Salomon Smith Barney, Newport Beach, CA 5. Government Pool - State of California Local Agency Investment Fund City of La Quinta Account La Quinta Redevelopment Agency 6. Bond Trustees - 1991 City Hall Revenue Bonds - US Bank 1991 RDA Project Area 1 - US Bank 1992 RDA Project Area 2 - US Bank 1994 RDA Project Area 1 - US Bank 1995 RDA Project Area 1 &2 - US Bank 1998 RDA Project Area 1 &2 - US Bank 2001 RDA Project Area 1 - US Bank 2002 RDA Project Area 1 - US Bank Assessment Districts - US Bank No Changes to this listing may be made without City Council approval 24 041 Appendix F BROKER/DEALER QUESTIONNAIRE AND CERTIFICATION 1. Name of Firm: 2. Address: 3. Telephone: ( ► 4. Broker's Representative to the City (attach resume): Name: Title: Telephone: ( ) 5. Manager/Partner-in-charge (attach resume): Name: Title: Telephone: 6. List all personnel who will be trading with or quoting securities to City employees (attach resume) Name: Title: Telephone: ( ) ( ► 7. Which of the above personnel have read the City's Investment Policy? 8. Which instruments are offered regularly by your local office? (Must equal 100%) % U.S. Treasuries % BA's % Commercial Paper % C D's % Mutual Funds % Agencies (specify): 25 % Repos % Reverse Repos % CMO's % Derivatives % Stocks/Equities % Other (specify): ..IR 9. References -- Please identify your most directly comparable public sector clients in our geographical area. Entity Contact Telephone Client Since Entity Contact Telephone ( ) Client Since 10. Have any of your clients ever sustained a loss on a securities transaction arising from a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of the risk characteristics of the instrument? If so, explain. 11 12. Has your firm or your local office ever been subject to a regulatory or state/ federal agency investigation for alleged improper, fraudulent, disreputable or unfair activities related to the sale of securities? Have any of your employees been so investigated? If so, explain. Has a client ever claimed in writing that you were responsible for an investment loss? Yes No If yes, please provide action taken Has a client ever claimed in writing that your firm was responsible for an investment loss? Yes No If yes, please provide action taken �4r 26 Do you have any current, or pending complaints that are unreported to the NASD? Yes No If yes, please provide action taken Does your firm have any current, or pending complaints that are unreported to the NASD? Yes No If yes, please provide action taken 13. Explain your clearing and safekeeping procedures, custody and delivery process. Who audits these fiduciary responsibilities? Latest Audit Report Date 1.4. How many and what percentage of your transactions failed. Last month? % $ Last year? % $ 15. Describe the method your firm would use to establish capital trading limits for the City of La Quinta. 16. Is your firm a member in the S.I.P.C. insurance program. Yes No If yes, explain primary and excess coverage and carriers. 17. What portfolio information, if any, do you require from your clients? 27 '?4n 18. What reports and transaction confirmations or any other research publications will the City receive? 19. Does your firm offer investment training to your clients? Yes No 20. Does your firm have professional liability insurance. Yes No If yes, please provide the insurance carrier, limits and expiration date. 21. Please list your NASD Registration Number 22. Do you have any relatives who work at the City of La Quinta? Yes No If yes, Name and Department 23. Do you maintain an office in California. Yes No 24. Do you maintain an office in La Quinta or Riverside County? Yes No 25. Please enclose the following: • Latest audited financial statements. • Samples of reports, transaction confirmations and any other research/publications the City will receive. • Samples of research reports and/or publications that your firm regularly provides to clients. • Complete schedule of fees and charges for various transactions. ***CERTIFICATION*** I hereby certify that I have personally read the Statement of Investment Policy of the City of La Quinta, and have implemented reasonable procedures and a system of controls designed to preclude imprudent investment activities arising out of transactions conducted between our firm and the City of La Quinta. All sales personnel will be routinely informed of the City's investment objectives, horizons, outlooks, strategies and risk constraints whenever we are so advised by the City. We pledge to exercise due diligence in informing the City of La Quinta of all foreseeable risks associated with financial transactions conducted with our firm. By signing this document the City of La Quinta is authorized to conduct any and all background checks. Under penalties of perjury, the responses to this questionnaire are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. �•' 247 Broker Representative Date Title Sales Manager and/or Managing Partner* Date Title 29 I • Appendix G INVESTMENT POOL QUESTIONNAIRE Note: This Investment Pool Questionnaire was developed by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). Prior to entering a pool, the following questions and issues should be considered. SECURITIES Government pools may invest in a broader range of securities than your entity invests in. It is important that you are aware of, and are comfortable with, the securities the pool buys. 1. Does the pool provide a written statement of Investment Policy and objectives? 2. Does the statement contain: a. A description of eligible investment instruments? b. The credit standards for investments? c. The allowable maturity range of investments? d. The maximum allowable dollar weighted average portfolio maturity? e. The limits of portfolio concentration permitted for each type of security? f. The policy on reverse repurchase agreements, options, short sales and futures? 3. Are changes in the policies communicated to the pool participants? 4. Does the pool contain only the types of securities that are permitted by your Investment Policy? LIMY &VA Interest is not reported in a standard format, so it is important that you know how interest is quoted, calculated and distributed so that you can make comparisons with other investment alternatives. Interest Calculations 1. Does the pool disclose the following about yield calculations: a. The methodology used to calculate interest? (Simple maturity, yield to maturity, etc.) b. The frequency of interest payments? c. How interest is paid? (Credited to principal at the end of the month, each quarter; mailed?) d. How are gains/losses reported? Factored monthly or only when realized? 30 ,) 4 REPORTING 1. Is the yield reported to participants of the pool monthly? (If not, how often?) 2. Are expenses of the pool deducted before quoting the yield? 3. Is the yield generally in line with the market yields for securities in which you usually invest? 4. How often does the pool report, and does that report include the market value of securities? SECURITY The following questions are designed to help you safeguard your funds from loss of principal and loss of market value. 1. Does the pool disclose safekeeping practices? 2. Is the pool subject to audit by an independent auditor? 3. Is a copy of the audit report available to participants? 4. Who makes the portfolio decisions? 5. How does the manager monitor the credit risk of the securities in the pool? 6. Is the pool monitored by someone on the board of a separate neutral party external to the investment function to ensure compliance with written policies? 7. Does the pool have specific policies with regards to the various investment vehicles? a. What are the different investment alternatives? b. What are the policies for each type of investment? 8. Does the pool mark the portfolio to its market value? 9. Does the pool disclose the following about how portfolio securities are valued: a. The frequency with which the portfolio securities are valued? b. The method used to value the portfolio (cost, current value, or some other method)? 31 250 OPERA TIONS The answers to these questions will help you determine whether this pool meets your operational requirements: 1. Does the pool limit eligible participants? 2. What entities are permitted to invest in the pool? 3. Does the pool allow multiple accounts and sub -accounts? 4. Is there a minimum or maximum account size? 5. Does the pool limit the number of transactions each month? What is the number of transactions permitted each month? 6. Is there a limit on transaction amounts for withdrawals and deposits? a. What is the minimum and maximum withdrawal amount permitted? b. What is the minimum and maximum deposit amount permitted? 7. How much notice is required for withdrawals/deposits? 8. What is the cutoff time for deposits and withdrawals? 9. Can withdrawals be denied? 10. Are the funds 100% withdrawable at anytime? 11. What are the procedures for making deposits and withdrawals? a. What is the paperwork required, if any? b. What is the wiring process? 12. Can an account remain open with a zero balance? 13. Are confirmations sent following each transaction? STA TEMENTS It is important for you and the agency's trustee (when applicable), to receive statements monthly so the pool's records of your activity and holding are reconciled by you and your trustee. 32 251 1. Are statements for each account sent to participants? a. What are the fees? b. How often are they passed? c. How are they paid? d. Are there additional fees for wiring funds (what is the fee)? 2. Are expenses deducted before quoting the yield? QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER FOR BOND PROCEEDS It is important to know (1) whether the pool accepts bond proceeds and (2) whether the pool qualifies with the U.S. Department of the Treasury as an acceptable commingled fund for arbitrage purposes. 1. Does the pool accept bond proceeds subject to arbitrage rebate? 2. Does the pool provide accounting and investment records suitable for proceeds of bond issuance subject to arbitrage rebate? 3. Will the yield calculation reported by the pool be acceptable to the IRS or will it have to be recalculated? 4. Will the pool accept transaction instructions from a trustee? 5. Are you allowed to have separate accounts for each bond issue so that you do not commingle the interest earnings of funds subject to rebate with funds not subject to regulations? 33 252 Appendix H GLOSSARY (Adopted from the Municipal Treasurers Association) The purpose of this glossary is to provide the reader of the City of La Quinta investment policies with a better understanding of financial terms used in municipal investing. AGENCIES: Federal agency securities and/or Government -sponsored enterprises. ASKED: The price at which securities are offered. BANKERS' ACCEPTANCE MA): A draft or bill of exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill, as well as the issuer. BID: The price offered by a buyer of securities. (When you are selling securities, you ask for a bid.) See Offer. BROKER: A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a commission. CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT (CD): A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a certificate. Large -denomination CD's are typically negotiable. COLLATERAL: Securities, evidence of deposit or other property which a borrower pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposits of public monies. COMMERCIAL PAPER: Short-term unsecured promissory notes issued by a corporation to raise working capital. These negotiable instruments are purchased at a discount to par value or at par value with interest bearing. Commercial paper is issued by corporations such as General Motors Acceptance Corporation, IBM, Bank America, etc. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR): The official annual report for the City of La Quinta. It includes five combined statements for each individual fund and account group prepared in conformity with GAAP. It also includes supporting schedules necessary to demonstrate compliance with finance -related legal and contractual provisions, extensive introductory material, and a detailed Statistical Section. COUPON: (a) The annual rate of interest that a bond's issuer promises to pay the bondholder on the bond's face value. (b) A certificate attached to a bond evidencing interest due on a payment date. DEALER: A dealer, as opposed to a broker, acts as a principal in all transactions, buying and selling for his own account. DEBENTURE: A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer. DELIVERY VERSUS PAYMENT: There are two methods of delivery of securities: delivery versus payment and delivery versus receipt. Delivery versus payment is delivery of securities with an exchange of money for the securities. Delivery versus receipt is delivery of securities with an exchange of a signed receipt for the securities. DERIVATIVES: (1) Financial instruments whose return profile is linked to, or derived from, the movement of one or more underlying index or security, and may include a leveraging factor, or (2) financial contracts based upon notional amounts whose value is derived from , an underlying index or security (interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equities or commodities). 34 253 DISCOUNT: The difference between the cost price of a security and its maturity when quoted at lower than face value. A security selling below original offering price shortly after sale also is considered to be at a discount. 3. DISCOUNT SECURITIES: Non -interest bearing money market instruments that are issued a discount and redeemed at maturity for full face value, e.g., U.S. Treasury Bills. DIVERSIFICATION: Dividing investment funds among a variety of securities offering independent returns. FEDERAL CREDIT AGENCIES: Agencies of the Federal government set up to supply credit to various classes of institutions and individuals, e.g., S&L's, small business firms, students, farmers, farm cooperatives, and exporters. 1. FNMAs (Federal National Mortgage Association) - Used to assist the home mortgage market by purchasing mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration and the Farmers Home Administration, as well as those guaranteed by the Veterans Administration. They are issued in various maturities and in minimum denominations of $10,000. Principal and Interest is paid monthly. 2. FHLBs (Federal Home Loan Bank Notes and Bonds) - Issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank System to help finance the housing industry. The notes and bonds provide liquidity and home mortgage credit to savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, cooperative banks, insurance companies, and mortgage -lending institutions. They are issued irregularly for various maturities. The minimum denomination is $5,000. The notes are issued with maturities of less than one year and interest is paid at maturity. The Other federal agency issues are Small Business Administration notes (SBAs), Government National Mortgage Association 35 bonds are issued with various maturities and carry semi-annual coupons. Interest is calculated on a 360-day, 30-day month basis. FLBs (Federal Land Bank Bonds) - Long-term mortgage credit provided to farmers by Federal Land Banks. These bonds are issued at irregular times for various maturities ranging from a few months to ten years. The minimum denomination is $1,000. They carry semi-annual coupons. Interest is calculated on a 360-day, 30 day month basis. 4. FFCBs (Federal Farm Credit Bank) - Debt instruments used to finance the short and intermediate term needs of farmers and the national agricultural industry. They are issued monthly with three- and six-month maturities. The FFCB issues larger issues (one to ten year) on a periodic basis. These issues are highly liquid. 5. FICBs (Federal Intermediate Credit bank Debentures) - Loans to lending institutions used to finance the short-term and intermediate needs of farmers, such as seasonal production. They are usually issued monthly in minimum denominations of $3,000 with a nine -month maturity. Interest is payable at maturity and is calculated on a 360- day, 30-day month basis. 6. FHLMCs (Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation) - a government sponsored entity established in 1970 to provide a secondary market for conventional home mortgages. Mortgages are purchased solely from the Federal Home Loan Bank System member lending institutions whose deposits are insured by agencies of the United States Government. They are issued for various maturities and in minimum denominations of $10,000. Principal and Interest is paid monthly. notes (GNMAs, Tennessee Valley Authority notes (TVAs), and Student Loan Association notes (SALLIE-MAEs). FEDERAL DEPOSITOR INSURANCE CORPORATION (FDIC): A federal agency that insures bank deposits, currently up to $100,000 per deposit. FEDERAL FUNDS RATE: The rate of interest at which Fed funds are traded. This rate is currently pegged by the Federal Reserve through open - market operations. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS (FHLB): Government sponsored wholesale banks (currently 12 regional banks) which lend funds and provide correspondent banking services to member commercial banks, thrift institutions, credit unions and insurance companies. The mission of the FHLBs is to liquefy the housing related assets of its members who must purchase stock in their district Bank. FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE (FOMC): Consists of seven members of the Federal Reserve Board and five of the twelve Federal Reserve Bank Presidents. The President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is a permanent member, while the other Presidents serve on a rotating basis. The Committee periodically meets to set Federal Reserve guidelines regarding purchases and sales of Government Securities in the open market as a means of influencing the volume of bank credit and money. FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM: the central bank of the United States created by Congress and consisting of a seven member Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., 12 regional banks and about 5,700 commercial banks that are members of the system. 36 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (GNMA or Ginnie Mae): Securities influencing the volume of bank credit guaranteed by GNMA and issued by mortgage bankers, commercial banks, savings and loan associations, and other institutions. Security holder is protected by full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Ginnie Mae securities are backed by the FHA, VA or FMHM mortgages. The term "passthroughs" is often used to describe Ginnie Maes. LAIF (Local Agency Investment Fund) - A special fund in the State Treasury which local agencies may use to deposit funds for investment. There is no minimum investment period and the minimum transaction is $ 5,000, in multiples of $1,000 above that, with a maximum balance of $30,000,000 for any agency. The City is restricted to a maximum of ten transactions per month. It offers high liquidity because deposits can be converted to cash in 24 hours and no interest is lost. All interest is distributed to those agencies participating on a proportionate share basis determined by the amounts deposited and the length of time they are deposited. Interest is paid quarterly. The State retains an amount for reasonable costs of making the investments, not to exceed one -quarter of one percent of the earnings. LIQUIDITY: A liquid asset is one that can be converted easily and rapidly into cash without a substantial loss of value. In the money market, a security is said to be liquid if the spread between bid and asked prices is narrow and reasonable size can be done at those quotes. LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL (LGIP): The aggregate of all funds from political subdivisions that a.re placed in the custody of the State Treasurer for investment and reinvestment. MARKET VALUE: The price at which a security is trading and could presumably be purchased or sold. 255 MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT: A written contract covering all future transactions between the parties to repurchase --reverse repurchase agreements that establishes each party's rights in the transactions. A master agreement will often specify, among other things, the right of the buyer -lender to liquidate the underlying securities in the vent of default by the seller -borrower. MATURITY: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable MONEY MARKET: The market in which short- term debt instruments (bills, commercial paper, banders' acceptances, etc.) are issued and traded. OFFER: The price asked by a seller of securities. (When you are buying securities, you ask for an offer.) See Asked and Bid. OPEN MARKET OPERATIONS: Purchases and sales of government and certain other securities in the open market by the New York Federal Reserve Bank as directed by the FOMC in order to influence the volume of money and credit in the economy. Purchases inject reserves into the bank system and stimulate growth of money and credit; sales have the opposite effect. Open market operations are the Federal Reserve's most important and most flexible monetary policy tool. PORTFOLIO: Collection of all cash and securities under the direction of the City Treasurer, including Bond Proceeds. PRIMARY DEALER: A group of government securities dealers who submit daily reports of market activity an depositions and monthly financial statements to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight. Primary dealers include Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) -registered securities broker -dealers, banks and a few unregulated firms. SECONDARY MARKET: A market made for the 37 QUALIFIED PUBLIC DEPOSITORIES: A financial institution which does not claim exemption from the payment of any sales or compensating use or ad valorem taxes under the laws of this state, which has segregated for the benefit of the commission eligible collateral having a value of not less than its maximum liability and which has been approved by the Public Deposit Protection Commission to hold public deposits. RATE OF RETURN: The yield obtainable on a security based on its purchase price or its current market price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity on a bond the current income return. REPURCHASE AGREEMENT (RP OR REPO): A repurchase agreement is a short-term investment transaction. Banks buy temporarily idle funds from a customer by selling U.S. Government or other securities with a contractual agreement to repurchase the same securities on a future date. Repurchase agreements are typically for one to ten days in maturity. The customer receives interest from the bank. The interest rate reflects both the prevailing demand for Federal funds and the maturity of the repo. Some banks will execute repurchase agreements for a minimum of $100,000 to $500,000, but most banks have a minimum of . $1,000,000. REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS (RRP or RevRepo) - A holder of securities sells these securities to an investor with an agreement to repurchase them at a fixed price on a fixed date. The security "buyer" in effect lends the "seller" money for the period of the agreement, and the terms of the agreement are structured to compensate him for this. Dealers use RRP extensively to finance their positions. Exception: When the Fed is said to be doing RRP, it is lending money, that is, increasing bank reserves. SAFEKEEPING: A service to customers rendered by banks for a fee whereby securities and valuables of all types and descriptions are held in the bank's vaults for protection. purchase and sale of outstanding issues following 256 the initial distribution. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION: Agency created by Congress to protect investors in securities transactions by administering securities legislation. SEC RULE .15C3-1: See Uniform Net Capital Rule STRUCTURED NOTES: Notes issued by Government Sponsored Enterprises (FHLB, FNMAS, SLMA, etc.) And Corporations which have imbedded options (e.g., call features, step- up coupons, floating rate coupons, derivative - based returns) into their debt structure, Their market performance is impacted by the fluctuation of interest rates, the volatility of the imbedded options and shifts in the Shape of the yield curve. SURPLUS FUNDS: Section 53601 of the California Government Code defines surplus funds as any money not required for immediate necessities of the local agency. The City has defined immediate necessities to be payment due within one week. TREASURY BILLS: A non -interest bearing discount security issued by the U.S. Treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in three months, six months or one year. TREASURY BONDS.: Long-term coupon -bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities of more than 10 years. TREASURY NOTES: Medium -term coupon -bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities from two to 10 years. UNIFORM NET CAPITAL RULE: Securities and Exchange Commission requirement that member firms as well as nonmember broker -dealers in securities maintain a maximum ratio of indebtedness to liquid capital of 15 to 1; also called net capital rule and net capital ratio. m Indebtedness covers all money owed to a firm, including margin loans and commitments to purchase securities, one reason new public issues are spread among members of underwriting syndicates. Liquid capital includes cash and assets easily converted into cash. UNIFORM PRUDENT INVESTOR ACT: The State of California has adopted this Act. The Act contains the following sections: duty of care, diversification, review of assets, costs, compliance determinations, delegation of investments, terms of prudent investor rule, and application. YIELD: The rate of annual income return on an investment, expressed as a percentage. (a) INCOME YIELD is obtained by dividing the current dollar income by the current market price for the security. (b) NET YIELD or YIELD TO MATURITY is the current income yield minus any premium above par of plus any discount from par in purchase price, with the adjustment spread over the period from the date of purchase to the date of maturity of the bond. 257 T4&t 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: Consideration of Appointments to the Architecture PUBLIC HEARING: and Landscape Review Committee, Community Services Commission, Cultural Arts Commission, Historic Preservation Commission, Investment Advisory Board, and Planning Commission RECOMMENDATION: Approve the selection of: 1) two appointees to two-year terms on the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee; 2) two appointees to two-year terms on the Community Services Commission; 3) three appointees to two-year terms on the Cultural Arts Commission; 4) one Professional Representative to an unexpired term on the Historic Preservation Commission; 5) one appointee to a three-year term on the Investment Advisory Board; and 6) three appointees to two-year terms on the Planning Commission. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The City Clerk's office placed articles in the Chamber of Commerce "Gem," advertisements in the Desert Sun and sent press releases to several newspapers notifying the public of the Commission terms expiring and vacant. Letters and applications were also mailed to all Board, Commission and Committee members, whose terms were expiring, inviting them to reapply by the June 10, 2002 deadline. 1. Architecture and Landscape Review Committee - The terms of Committee Members Bill Bobbitt and Dennis Cunningham will expire June 30, 2002. Both Mr. Bobbitt and Mr. Cunningham have applied for reappointment. Applications have also been filed by Scott Burch, Lynda Baker and Thomas McGraw. Copies of the applications are enclosed as Attachments 1-A through 1-E. 25 q 2. Community Services Commission - The terms currently held by Commissioners Victoria (Tori) St. Johns, Joan Rebich, and Mike Davis expire on June 30, 2002 Commissioners St. Johns and Davis have applied for reappointment. Commissioner Rebich has declined to seek reappointment. Two additional applications were received from Terje "TY Berger and Gary L. Calhoun. Copies of their applications are enclosed as Attachments 2-A through 2-D. 3. Cultural Arts Commission - Three (3) two-year terms are scheduled to expire on June 30, 2002. Commissioners Denise Diamond and Dan Baxley have re- applied and Commissioner Shamis has indicated she does not wish to seek reappointment. Lynda Baker, Sheldon Brodsky, Donna Kay Pillow, Thomas McGraw, Edwin O'Connell and Carolyn Hartley have submitted applications for consideration. Copies of the applications are enclosed as Attachments 3-A through 3-H. 4. Historic Preservation Commission - One (1) vacancy exists on the Historic Preservation Commission as a result of the recent resignation of Professional Representative Michael Mitchell. The appointment would be for a two year unexpired term. Applications have been received from Leslie Mouriquand and Terje "T.J." Berger. Copies of their applications are enclosed as Attachments 4-A and 4-B. 5. Investment Advisory Board - One (1) vacancy exists on the Investment Advisory Board. Three applications were received from Aldo Corsini, Kurt Mortenson and Adriana F. Romero. A copy of the applications are enclosed as Attachments 5-A through 5-C. 6. Planning Commission - Three (3) two-year terms will expire on the Planning Commission as of June 30, 2002. Commissioners Jacques Abels, Tom Kirk and Robert Tyler have applied for reappointment. In addition, eleven (1 1) applications have been received from Aldo Corsini, Richard M. Johnson, Jr. Carol Emmons, M. Allan O'Neil, Lawrence P. Rogoway, Robert Sharman, Leonard S. Bustos, Robert Hoffman, Dennis S. Wish, Rob Dawson and Robert W. Wilkinson. Copies of the applications are enclosed as Attachments 6-A through 6-N. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the selection of: 1) two appointees to a two-year term on the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee; 2) three appointees to two- year terms on the Community Services Commission; 3) three appointees to two- year terms on the Cultural Arts Commission; 4) one appointee to a three-year term on the Historic Preservation Commission; 5) one appointee to a three-year term on the Investment Advisory Board; and 6) three appointees to two-year 25� terms on the Planning Commission; or 004-. 2. Do not approve the selection of 1) two appointees to a two-year term on the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee; 2) three appointees to two- year terms on the Community Services Commission; 3) three appointees to two- year terms on the Cultural Arts Commission; 4) one appointee to a three-year term on the Historic Preservation Commission; 5) one appointee to a three-year term on the Investment Advisory Board; and 6) three appointees to two-year terms on the Planning Commission; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, JOT4 . Greek, CIVIC City Clerk Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: Attachment 1 A-D - Architecture & Landscape Review Committee Applications Attachment 2 A-D - Community Services Commission Applications Attachment 3 A-H - Cultural Arts Commission Applications Attachment 4 A-B - Historic Preservation Commission Applications Attachment 5 A-C - Investment Advisory Board Applications Attachment 6 A-M - Planning Commission Applications nn3 260 Date: Jam- — 16 — CZ �4ECEIVEf.-) CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY L� 1Lr APPLICATION TO 9ER1J�t �- 1NTq CrFICE ON LA QUINTA ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE NAME: V_c LL F3o6rb'I T"-("' HOME ADDRESS: 78— 78 S W . NA(Z. L,4,N D Rt(/E La Q�iAJrA, CA 9Z Zs3 BUSINESS ADDRESS _ Pam• -Pjo)L 106C L_1k ?2,2,5 J7- IF EMPLOYED, LIST YOUR EMPLOYER AND POSITION(S) YOU HOLD LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: yEAR5 HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMITTEE? Ct-(/2r2EN%" ME/`{6ErZ Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other back- ground. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. 261 �Lf APPLICATION, ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee. _ 14AVC ©VO 7,qE AL—l2C, S/A/c-e �utiiE /9763 What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 _ 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 262 Cy � . CITY OF LA QUINTA Date " �►e- 9, �18 ctn co =j C APPLICATION TO SERVE C, -< Z ON = o � LA QUINTA ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMgIW-TELr- m r n = 3 v NAME: C.(/i�-�iR.�t iB��-�- CALycP-7- BoBP�i7-T co D 'n HOME ADDRESS: 78- 785` Gele-57- �/st e c�.yy d� �/E- L . Q. 9.z-z.s3 (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: P0. Sox 1066 G.Q. TELEPHONE: (HOME)(77 ) 77Z-7..S222 (BUSINESS) (76oJ 771—IZ3 IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: P.G.A. GcJC57- S�UEit1T'/f�G �SSaC. _L LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: Z//YER.eS Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. Zr ,es of G'o��c- (ore /G E Cis T Co ck. Go--r� /'� 4 _Cw) / 970-72- . zi,�-A✓r4eco /-. wp-5cftPc 1--I�o 61fr�L4S- /: �uE�icloscftP� D�-r�c, �cJ o1,c% 973 /98±�- eyEo 7e C�a4csrE �L�Y AL7- To 5u,?.5 S'u�°ce ✓iso,e_• T T S�.eJ�6-5 CL6!/3 �� it.Eafy ili/�SPGE uit%T�L �%�%• �o�"IyTED T le F-4Q4-•1CST /N Jf5 1i�. JP1AJC- lyEy-loE- O� Z—C.el �SSoc-- 63 .Z- �i� /9 CE2T/F/� T .�1 p f�u,�ci•�i�;p f1�/'G� c�7�2 oy:ruH wr7l Received Jun-12-98 11:08am 3un-12-98 10:58A Jun-lb-723 01;SZFr. troy. 76077151257 from GGIT7 G3 -� PGA WES-r Page page 2 P_02 APPLICATION, ARCHITECTURAL Sr LANDSCAPE REVIEi4' C.UMMITTEE PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, anti procedures of the Arctutectural anti Landscape Review Cotrunittee. 7W LHitfP-r� ice V!rC40 �tiTrE.". /QED^-�`!i`i t✓n!o/{ 1 o.u'S._ a� What specific issues or problems face the Architectural Landscape Review Committee and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? �i2ncE • .�� 777 —�-5 �s"ems cam-- v,AI O What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enliance the work of the Architectural and Landscape Review Committee? ,escx! /.Lj �u ��i ��. o c�?oE iL�.✓ lErCfC L7.JoSC4PE" - fie✓ PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION NO LATER THAN JUNE 15, 1998 TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU Fop YOUR WZLINGNFS5 TO St,RVF- YOUR L0P.4L GOVLXNWEtvT. 264 .y Oo56- T0'd 9TS5 9LL 09L:W0HJ GRAI303H I V a I 't; ,C a '0Q_ jam_ LZ:TT Z0-ST-90 et ATTACHMENT 1-13 CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON Date: Z LA QUINTA ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE A I NAME: HOME ADDRESS: BUSINESS ADDRESS t 4 - PfKA 5aa IF EMPLOYED, LIST YOUR EMPLOYER AND POSITION(S) YOU HOLD LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: (iea:5 (47iU Cpizrr�� HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMITTEE? Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other back- ground. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. �6n A.�n — I.n_.n 1.,nn. l, _ ... __ W._ T•da 9TS6-9LL-09L sawoH uuapoW s2utjJS wTed eLE=TT ao 01 unr Z0'd 9TS6 9LL 69L:KOHA GRAI203H SZ:TT Z0-61-90 APPLICATION, ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the Architectural & Landscape Review Committee. La Quinta What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? se S - A , 4, 0a "t lit - What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would work of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee? enhance the PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2 c G �u z•d 91S6-9LL-09L SawoH uuapoW S2uiadS wTed eLC=TT ao 01 unC RECEIVED Date 2000 MAY 2 3 PM 12: 0 7 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITTA CITY YCCLERKA'SOFFICE E APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE NAME: 1 \ K HOME DRESS: (Must be a La Quinta resulent and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS:Z TELEPHONE: (HOME) (BUSINESS) (��© IF E LOYED, WH4RE YOU WORK AND POSIT ON YOU H D: • �-- "�� '.'-per LENGTH OF RESIDENCE 114 LA QUINTA: Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other backgrgqnd. Please be include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. A4 E C_._� V 03 267 APPLICATION, ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape view Committee. _ What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee and d you have any su gestions to address t ose issues or problems? d� 6- What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee? 1 _ -% _ a 0 PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 268 It O CD -1 to ;7- RECEIVED ? l2 J U N - S P 1: 01 CITY 3" L r; QUINTA CITY CLEK'S OFFICE CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON _4� Date: S �� AT ACHMENT 1--C LA QUINTA ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE NAME: � � �"l- HOME ADDRESS: `7 7 —141-5 111A QX-Vl6ov I -A- 1�1071_kT_A_ .77- 7_ 3 BUSINESS ADDRESS llftorli "SAO- 9 ZZGD IF EMPLOYED, LIST YOUR EMPLOYER AND POSITION(S) YOU HOLD 46s95ze- . LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: :� ye'IL� HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMITTEE? 14.,y Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other back- ground. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. • .��- z"ram/ i rTxw-- -4, e~1 -1 A �' ��/ Gas s _ • /-Oy �xg_ie_� tit'" Ge- /,6-S'l ftj FWV - 69 APPLICATION, ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee. Ui✓ ,�- "/As N��-�D�o /his . 14,4i/ 15s-y� e4-A/ _ ?�l�9►T �G,�S�✓i�b- Gr> rt��r*-s39R1d7✓ �a72� ��/?�,rY,�f� �v � What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? r/ L i�i ' , I .mil �" �/t ✓i' What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee? i 7f'011; Ad Gp- Q,+rt ' /� 6"Q''k r/u"V-- �' C- Awe Oso)ze' &V4wZ-30- PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: /4jrC,- APMA4e, A;;(4�X'2s , CITY CLERK ysGlo ¢=coG/N� P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 -3%*1~ A4rr�f— f7wlw` THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 270, Fa�;j. RECEIVED 2�? Jl114 -o Pi3 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY or ! 1�1 0"_1T A APPLICATION TO SERVE CITY C'_Ep r, S OFFICE Date: ATTAc4M t NT 1—b ON LA QUINTA ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE NAM E: ! ' HOME ADDRESS:�� ` U — J i BUSINESS ADDRESS IF EMPLOYED, LIST YOUR EMPLOYER AND POSITION(S) YOU HOLD LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMITTEE? LI-f_ K Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other back- ground. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. • ,�� ./L . � �%" .c�.,% lcGam'` <<J� -c'f _ ��L_� G '.i 2zC,)17 �J�lli � 2'71 M W APPLICATION, ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 27^ oil LYNDA BARER #3 HOLMAN ROAD P.O. BOX 963 C4RMEL VALLEY, CAUdFORNLI 93924 (831) 659-3252 SUPERVISORY.• * Supervised staff including secretaries & receptionists. * Organized & chaired secretarial/receptionist meetings. * Formulated staffing policies & procedures. * Maintained daily business & personal calendars for Director, Associate Director, and Manager Behavioral Health Services. * Prepared & sent department time sheets for Payroll and kept accountability log for stag`. * Made travel arrangements for department staff. * Maintained Inservice, Continuing and Scholarship Education files for staff`. * Maintained hospital & department manuals. * Arranged for maintenance & repair of office equipment. SECRETARIAL: * Responsible for all telephone operations & communications. * Consistently typed 80+ words per minute with no more than five (5) errors. * Responsiblefor implementation and instruction ofdepa rtmenta I patient scheduling system. * Displayed knowledge of computer systems, photocopiers, facsimiles, shredders, calculators. * Improved & maintained a centralized ordering system;oroffice forms & supplies. * Responsible forpreparation & distribution of monthly, quarterly, yearly statistical reports. * Coordinated & scheduled meeting rooms, including set-up, dietary, & breakdown. * Input & audited daily doctor & patient charges. 273 WORK HISTORY.• 1997 - PRESENT 1993 - 1997 1996 - Present 1993 - Present COMMUNITY HOSPITAL of MONTEREY PENINSULA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES - Office Supervisor COMMUNITY HOSPITAL of MONTEREY PENINSULA RECOVERY CENTER - Administrative Secretary Served on CHOMP Security Awareness Committee, Ken Gordon, Chairperson Recovery Center Alumni Association liaison 1992 - 1993 COMMUNITY HOSPITAL of MONTEREY PENINSULA RECOVERY CENTER - Office Supervisor (position eliminated 11193 upon closing of Inpatient Services) 1991 - 1992 Served on CHOMP Safety Committee - Carolina Bayne, Chairperson 1989 - 1990 COMMUNITY HOSPITAL of MONTEREY PENINSULA RECOVERY CENTER - Outreach/Marketing Secretary 274 0 ..L .:: Dates ')" E: tn RECEIVED 22. CITY 0 ^'_ �; ,�OFFICE CITY CLt: CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ATTACHMENT 1-E LA QUINTA ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE HOME ADDRESS: "E"DOZA.. `t2 2.�-, BUSINESS ADDRESS IF EMPLOYED, LIST YOUR EMPLOYER AND POSITION(S) YOU HOLD LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: (0 1111�6 HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMITTEE? Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other back- ground. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. — AFTER ATTENDING PASADENA CITY COLLAGE, DS, AND ART CENTER — SCHOOL I WAS EMPLOYED BY CANNELL & CHAFFEN, A COMMERCIAL AND — RESIDENTIAL INTERIOR FIRM, DESIGNED FURNITURE FOR MARTIN — BRATTRUD, MORGANELLI & HEUMAN AS DEPARTMENT HEAD FOR HOTEL AND COUNTRY CLUB INTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL AND INTERIOR DESIGN _ I THEN OPENED MY OWN DESIGN FIRM SPECIALIZING IN CERAMIC TILE SHOWROOMS, MEDICAL / OFFICE BUILDINGS AND SOME LARGE RESIDENTIAL WORK. I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AN AVID GARDENER AND — HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN LANDSCAPE DESIGN IN NEWPORT BEACH, LOS ANGELES, SANTA FE, AND NOW IN THE DESERT AREA — 75 0 i =x APPLICATION, ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE ARE TO REVIEW PROJECTS, MAKE SUGGESTIONS THAT WILL ENHANCE THE TOTAL DESIGN IN KEEPING WITH THE IMAGE THAT LA QUINTA WANTS TO PROJECT. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? MOST COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPING IS BLAND THERE ARE MANY PLANTS AND TREES THAT WILL THRIVE IN OUR DESERT LANDSCAPE AND PROVIDE BLOOMS YEAR ROUND THAT CURRENTLY ARE NOT USED AND COULD PROVIDE MUCH INTEREST AND I WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO INTRODUCE THEM INTO SOME OF OUR NEW DEVELOPMENTS What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Architectural & Landscape Review Committee? FIRST OF ALL I LOVE LA QUINTA AND WOULD BE MOST PLEASED IF I COULD BE A SMALL PART OF IT DEVELOPMENT. MY ABILITY TO ENVISION A COMPLETED BUILDING OR LANDSCAPE SHOULD BE OF GREAT ASSISTANCE TO'THE CITY. PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT o1; 4 , A S/-23/0,-- ATTACHMENT 2-A Date: RECEIVED 5 _ CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY G CfTC APPLICATION TO SERVE �' 5 OFFICE ON LA QUINTA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION NAME: n 2 • -600_tom► - BUSINESS ADDRESS _ 92 04;0 Ca\\e E<�vN � Iy IF EMPLOYED, LIST YOUR EMPLOYER AND POSITION(S) YOU HOLD LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: IG yes HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? P vec" �nC VZ.n Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other back- ground. Please be sure to include experiences relevanttoduties of the position you seek. 53 �gas: Q� rnr1c^ �GVTNu� M l �n the �c�Q Y�c11n Va� r� - - •-. e G C. \ C.O .cE \r� M l 1J1 .. 4r nr�a 4- e \/� r, nr1 . r%uo I CGc t . ,kn�r0 kc-)S APPLICATION, COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Community --Services Commission. ` 1 cccA �y he eg n vo\vek k'u' kc)cs C'm n`• e o ejcmr't' ssLow What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Community Services Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? _C) LL'n,' G Qr u Ms l'�G . What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Community Services Commission? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT78 of 1V0+L') Q_6 (ol7/0;1,� ATTACHMENT 2-B June 7, 2002 FEE C" ; \/ E D Ci- �;r 'S OFFICE Biographical Information on Mike Davis for the La Quinta Community Services Commission Address: 54290 Avenida Montezuma La Quinta, Ca. 92253 Phone: (760) 985-6939 Length of Residence In La Quinta: I I years Education: B.A. Business, California Coast University Work Experience: 19 years in Sports Management and Special Events Promotions and Management. Currently the Facilities Operation Manager of the Los Angeles Mercedes-Benz Cup. Has also worked at the US Open and a number of other tennis events like the Davis Cup and the Indian Wells event. Has created settings for concerts such as Kenny Rogers, Julio Iglesias, and shows like Dorothy Hamill's Winter Wonderland. Duties: Maintaining a $500,000 facilities budget, consulting on site issues, negotiating contractor bids, and ensuring a smooth running event. Knowledge of La Quinta Community Services Commission regulations and Procedures: As a current member of the Community Service Commission, I am privy to how the city and commission work together. Because of this knowledge, I used my background to give suggestions for the City of La Quinta 200' Anniversary celebration. I also helped on the planning committee and attended each event as well as helping out when needed. This also included helping with the Community Picnics like I have done in the past. I also helped with the planning of the Fritz 279 Burns pool and park project. I hope to continue the work I've done in establishing relationships with my fellow Community Service commission members as well as city officials to further the "teamwork" environment necessary to accomplish the goals of the Commission. Problems Facing the Commission from Your Perspective: My concerns are still that we set aside enough land for community parks. The new land that the city just purchased for the golf course hopefully can also be developed into a recreational park with hiking trails and a family park. We also need to concentrate on providing safety through proper lighting as well as checking all the parks on a regular bases. I feel that this should be a duty of this commission like we have talked about in the past. We also need to continue to expand on the wonderful programs already started so far in our city. This expansion would reach out to all community members by offering involvement opportunities for the various age groups. This kind of broad -based, and multifaceted programming will contribute to the reduction of gang violence, for instance, by providing alternatives for youth. Ultimately, La Quinta's image will be one of community in the true sense of the word, and become a sought after place to live. What Skills, Attitudes, And Expertise Do You Have That Will Enhance The Work of the La Quinta Community Services Commission: Having worked for 19 years in Sports Management, I've learned that remaining calm under pressure, and making decisions with a variety of personalities produces smoother management of events. My expertise in managing, budgeting, and planning events will enhance the goals already set by the city, and provide direction for effective facility/land usage in the future. J �- - Date:%up �oa2 RECEIVED - A?W+IMIE aT A.- C 2002 JUN - 5 PM 1: 0 5 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION NAME: /CE i-Rj 'BkFR 6 C--eo HOME ADDRESS: 5-2- %D!;- 0662�60A-) BUSINESS ADDRESS 527©f- A-V&WIDI+ C�SPC�6 41l IF EMPLOYED, LIST YOUR EMPLOYER AND POSITION(S) YOU HOLD LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: -2 HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? A/jo Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other back- ground. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. Msy: L-X)4 AeO/01� SweZ& f97i;- — c?aon A;i Asc.X o L Iry /omd::k r r " ma I'M, 0 ih a loaf `YDd r c.., A-39,on& 281 p40 ,.APPLICATION, COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION PAGE 2 i Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Community Services Commission. _ , . What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Community Services Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? 0 at'd G h`2t-'�1ii . 11 r What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Community Services Commission? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 28- The Salaried Employees' Union (HTI) A non -political union for salaried personnel working in the private sector, primarily in commerce, transport and service industries. HTF has over 155.000 members and the primary role is to ensure the security and well-being of its members at the workplace. General Comittee Head Office General Council 80 representatives Meets once every second year. (Used to be every 4'" year) Representative at 4 different counclls District Office for District Council for Stockholm Election Committee for Stockholm County Meets once every year Stockholms District Council. 40.000 members Representative for from 1983 Chairman for 5 years to 2000 Board member for 7 years ---------------------- Network Club ' 5 dubs, 10.000 members 1 -----------J 1 Chairman for 6 years ; Board member for 10 ; years •----------,------------ The Wholesale Trade 1 Employees' Club 4.000 members Chairman for 6 years Board member from 1983 281 It N.V,c-,\a4 ATTACHMENT 2-1) RECEIVED Date: Julje 3, 2002 2c .lU+I — Yii l L CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY G�_ .4� CUIHTA CITY OL E:� r''S 0 F F I C EAPPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION NAME: Gary L. Calhoun HOME ADDRESS: 48-517 Via Amistad La Qunita, Ca. 92253 BUSINESS ADDRESS 44-950 Eldorado Dr., Indian Wells, CA. 92210 IF EMPLOYED, LIST YOUR EMPLOYER AND POSITION(S) YOU HOLD City of Indian Wells - Management Analyst LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 5 years, 7 months HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? Yes Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other back- ground. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. I spent twenty-three years in the United States Marine Corps and have worked in city government for another nine years. I have a Bachelor's degree and have completed all my course requirements for my Master's degree in Public Administration from Cal State an Bernardino. I have lived in La Ouinta since 19 6 I have been involved in sports by playing, coaching youth teams, or officiating for forty years J have been a volunteer with tha Special Olmpics since 1974. 284 03 APPLICATION, COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION PAGE 2 f Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Community Services Commission. Please see attached sheet, answer #1. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Community Services Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? Please see attached sheet, answer # 2. What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Community Services Commission? Please see attached sheet, answer # 3. PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GO VERNMEN E85 �- t CITY 0P LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION ADDENDUM ANSWER SHEET # 1. Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Community Services Commission. The La Quinta Community Services Commission serves as a body that acts as a liaison between the citizens and the City Council. It serves in an advisory capacity as a conduit to gather and relay information to and from Council from residents, business owners, and interested civic organizations. The Commission is tasked with aiding the Council and staff in identifying what leisure and community services the residents desire and implementing a clear and cogent approach in the delivery of chosen services. The Commission meets on a regularly scheduled basis to consider matters under its purview. The Commission is regulated by the stipulations in Chapter 2.95 of the La Quinta Charter and Municipal Code. # 2. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Community Services Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? Two specific issues I see facing La Quinta is that continued growth will create an increased demand to satisfy the leisure and community services needs of our residents and retaining quality of life while increasing our revenue stream. La Quinta is a City that has experienced enormous growth in the recent past and demographics indicate that this growth will continue throughout this decade. With growth comes the need and the demand to provide leisure and community �2�6 r services for our residents. These services must be delivered economically and in a timely manner yet must be planned and orderly. Leisure and community services not only bring pleasure and fulfillment to our residents but can also serve to aid other city departments such as law enforcement and code enforcement. If the youth of our City don't have adequate positive wholesome outlets for their energies such as skateboard parks, sports facilities, culturally enriching or educational classes that will hold their interests, andlike venues then they will find other things to do with their time. For instance, they may decide to skateboard at a business complex disrupting business and possibly damaging property. Another area of concern is revenue generation. Cities are limited in ways which they can raise revenues. Cities are being asked to do more with less. Recently, La Quinta decided to move forward with its plan to build a golf course in the hopes of attracting hotels from which we will derive Transient Occupancy Taxes. While the proposed golf course and hotels are an excellent way to raise revenues we must not forget quality of life issues for our residents. I feel this Commission can play an integral part in ensuring the City not only maximizes its revenue stream but also protects the quality of life by endeavoring to integrate this project with the natural beauty that abounds in La Quinta. # 3. What specific attitudes, skills, and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Community Services Commission? I am a team player that will bring a can -do attitude to the Commission. I am a strong supporter of staff. I have a wealth of work and life experiences. I have the educational and technical background that will enable me to contribute to the Commission's endeavors in a positive manner. But most importantly, I have the desire to see La Quinta grow into the kind of City of which we can all be proud. I feel La Quinta is on the verge of tremendous growth and it is incumbent upon the City to provide its residents with the best services it can and this includes leisure and community services. I believe the Community Services Commission will play an integral role in deciding which services our residents will receive and how best to deliver those services. Thank you for your consideration. Gary L. Calhoun 287 N 2 N16�14,e_d -�/3) ATTACHMENT 3-A Date: CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON S 0^ ;� LA QUINTA CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION NAME: ! � e N SC c (A'N-0yQ,6 HOME ADDRESS: a 'I6D A-oe�NJ-a AtLo-V� c Ns'i'c � C-1' BUSINESS ADDRESS IF EMPLOYED, LIST YOUR EMPLOYER AND POSITION(S) YOU HOLD 0- W ( 11R� LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: �I HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other baLk- ground. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you sleek. Z `+K 0- r4is- t*-,* C) c* o (Ties r 'r4�E-1 0"d +6LLI C rN �(� --6- �IWV76--r,-,4eT� VV mac,' WE - APPLICATION, CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Co mission. L) 1 Sellded nv, LO, t-Y"' O ��i c3�2-S . �e �e Q CFX S a� Pti� r's. dcowv� �- at/+ ve What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Cultural A ommission and do you have 81hy suggestions to address those issues or problems? r- 4 . 7 CA)Oc-t 1G7 uT (!!0rn01af?1'IJV What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta CulturalArts Commission?U *( '� (�bw M ��/o n :�4' Palj)ril�(Za rz e — 01� 110 PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2 S 9 Cultural Arts Commission 1. This is a five -member commission, with members serving two-year staggered terms. The normal expiration date for terms is June 301. 2. Meetings are held at 7:00 P.m. on the second Thursday of each month. 3. Attendance at one or more meetings is recommended of all applicants. 4. Only residents of the City of La Quinta may apply. 5. A Statement of Economic Interests will be required of all appointees prior to assuming the position and will be required to be filed annually For a copy of the form or for additional information, contact June Greek, City Clerk, 777-7025. 6. Attached herewith are the following documents: a. Application Form b. Roster of current members C. Enacting ordinance 7. For additional information concerning this Commission, call Dodie Horvitz at (760) 777-7090, the staff liaison assigned to this Commission. DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTING APPLICATIONS IS YOU WILL BE NOTIFIED OF THE INTERVIEW DATE '-N #-, 1 ATTACHMENT 3-13 jzs- RECEIVED 2�12 J U N - 6 G I I I: 41 CIT Y_ OF LQUINTA CITY--CL-ERM'S OFFICE Date: ( • 4 • d Z CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION NAME: NAI M . &&t. E Y HOME ADDRESS: Tr jab #7WACA5 a - IF EMPLOYED, LIST YOUR EMPLOYER AND POSITION(S) YOU HOLD &WICSC- dGE 7W bE5EAff Z&Mg /, C9_bEN i -/M5i ie0G77Dn/ LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 14 YAQ - 6 J140107/5 HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? iE5 • ►C Rgew—t WlfN &-4 Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other back- ground. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. MCC ba LA l ViffrA Cut iDge t WS Cd► mi SSionl� �o i� AU2 571�►Z uaiy f CQD-AE5 poNSr/3(.6 Fok Art AWC A&s 940rA44WS iscuociEs 791 Ir i lk Aar 10-ft Gk(2a/Arl7A HDA -9D12Wn . O YI ESQ &CD/u DN i &_b"AFi V41 C*dry cAftwtlTFis/ PA[u'► d��t <NBiy!/�eYL Cin2av Qf ;'&W- ' Lat 291 APPLICATION, CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission. WE Ati $6T A07N iN cx/SVdG heGQjj 1&JcS -WAg- I "k, S7VI.)jfiq' A".e UN Darts/'�!>►+l� � hs�/c SAMU G'D A79 1hL CST YAJ�rc 091EM &&-V Oja W& A17S LJIa.... SGrBn� • gAt/tJfCt.Y -rum Rlxi hi : 0144yE 1 S 7a t E'smAi D 7t9 W 7 7)+ ,&aZA.) A--b -m PcAJ Ace 7Hs Cft=-V C. zw7w AF wk uT" i [nt ",AL ei"M is itEAM EdraL!it QC y Pow ID'* yL Ness '*V"7* A ACT MK, E""da pa1v6"R—, oe Afyh' to CA 4*1" 4 tanrows• ih rduyr 441C14 CoLDAQAL M& ALY 7;4&r Nb-%bS if 44 ftmA& 11pai'd6 ��]u fur VI* 7?4 A01 What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? THE CQWAt %L0A) k li . AWG"'h11'JG ITS Aeu[ { Pff*40iclu.Y yfws What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission? UM Y wa,t fhij go L is 4 W6 r-4 (AQ1 A) L ► 7r LQ b d-" #hi2 ea Li.: w Age 11A0X• &r M *e a Co ye¢s at-, 6EA&- 'V bEuso,+ o tttid6 "�tE7�tlrrT~S�i�w'iL A'�UIGE�' VIA-Gy�uSta1S1lS /�U►47 A,6Q TMcz-/I'r JC75aL.a-z*/(e •h ► g&& &o �S /S&; `v Tu9r.t S . Awt A �'4-RyK o c skt w u N Dr��tpr,�w,�S T1bsC r ed 7t c ac. PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL G O VERNMEN 29 1 t ATTACHMENT 3-C Date: RECEIVED CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY LA QUINTAPPLICATION TO SERVE CITY CI_F'RK'S OFFICE ON LA QUINTA CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION NAME: HOME ADDRESS: BUSINESS ADDRESS Vif IF EMPLOYED, LIST YOUR EMPLOYER AND POSITION(S) YOU HOLD__ LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION?., C' Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other back- ground. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. ,./>/; /.L%�•!�,�.�1-� r��/ ��i�� / l �s� /:_ %i' '`�%�' . �2 i L.�i'� �Li%art � L l 293 0 3 ]" APPLICATION, CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 294 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 1 LYADA BAKER #3 HOLMAN ROAD P.O. BOX 963 CARMFL VALLEY, C4LIFORNM 93924 (831) 659-3252 SUPERVISORY. - Supervised staff including secretaries & receptionists. * Organized & chaired secretarial/receptionist meetings. * Formulated stgffing policies & procedures. * Maintained daily business & personal calendars forDirector, Associate Director, and Manager Behavioral Health Services. # Prepared & sent department time sheets for Payroll and kept accountability log for staff. # Made travel arrangements for department staff. * Maintained Inservice, Continuing and Scholarship Education files for staf. * Maintained hospital & department manuals. * Arranged for maintenance & repair of office equipment. SECRETARIAL: * Responsible for all telephone operations & communications. * Consistently typed 80+ words per minute with no more than five (5) errors. * Responsible for implementation and instruction of departmental patient scheduling system. * Displayed knowledge of computer systems, photocopiers, facsimiles; shredders, calculators. * Improved & maintained a centralized ordering system for officeforms & supplies. * Responsible forpreparation & distribution of monthly, quarterly, yearly statistical reports. # Coordinated & scheduled meeting rooms, including set-up, dietary, & breakdown. * Input & audited daily doctor & patient charges. 2 9 5 WORK HISTORY: 1997 - PRESENT COMMUNITY HOSPITAL of MOAT EREY PENINSULA BEHAVIORAL. HEALTH SERVICES - Office Supervisor 1993 - 1997 COMMUNITY HOSPITAL of MONTEREY PENINSULA RECOVERY CENTER - Administrative Secretary 1996 - Present Served on CHOMP Security Awareness Committee, Ken Gordon, Chairperson 1993 - Present Recovery Center Alumni Association liaison 1992 - 1993 COMMUNITY HOSPITAL of MONTEREY PENINSULA RECOVERY CENTER - Office Supervisor (position eliminated 11193 upon closing of Inpatient Services) 1991 - 1992 Served on CHOMP Safety Committee - Carolina Bayne, Chairperson 1989 - 1990 COMMUNITY HOSPITAL of MONTEREY PENINSULA RECOVERY CENTER - Outreach/Marketing Secretary 29t y INN �' 4. ;e.j 4-Qo a Q +RECEIVED �1rn1 Ill 1 ,� CITTI 11 U t;;� OFFICE J -1 �-, CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON Date: M A Z 0/ 2-�ov Z ATTACHMENT 3-D LA QUINTA CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION NAME: S H G LTL)a►J 6(?- DD SIB Y Ar HOME ADDRESS: �- Ci 4V© I ll _ A P:D, M L—P,Q�iN �A, GIB 42zS3 BUSINESS ADDRESS IF EMPLOYED, LIST YOUR EMPLOYER AND POSITION(S) YOU HOLD LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 2 rn D N 1 1-4.(,' HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? (% D Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other back- ground. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. U?00 Grp ►:sue A-TI 00 1► _�G W1A4yo yy Sc fool. I'}-4F C1� 00J61Z6 y o f-geV NS1 L. vo'*,)kA wt i t:t A (*j eccajom�cs� Lvat'�c--> titer NC-w 09-V, AS A AG"z- A—( MuS is �,jpoy o�m ni) u V lNw—etc_�a.( MCA) I lac= (4'(a_C16.51i Tart 1'� N i E4c__ o Q L D, L Cu oc-ri out rp, S Ajj A7 0 1 �C—fZSo� K1c- lNM W N-6&(L. U Wl t L Z M u Q &Z> i o 1-a S A%3 6 C (-E-5 . 2. GU c) A s I� r I - C cC-� © N 1;::c L-w\ CA-N"�> 2 PIZ23 C<:,- rS A-1 c iS S. M 6 iC 19-AJE C_ C-3> C_ x-rc-.O1S 1y C-' 41 to "D OU-T a (c: U- S- V s t T� N G M ►� � u5 �� s l lu iy u. w "4_�, L T`j`'l n, WMIN (2-`' M , G'c. 1. ' � (Z C -% (Z L b 1� tom• �� W i ArN A 3 o1I &D c D AL Qv�NTi4 . 297 v J APPLICATION, CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission. i N eG S- ► yvM 4 ps fz r -b , t-3 c—c.y 2�� t�C I-t' . -�-- 1 -1-O N e s ( L D w o k W �-T t- -v C 2 c—�� t 3 ^i I�� C6 m SS( 'Dili What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? Sy Q Q v S E I �-4 C- �m C- S C o m M 1 S S I o 1V OF- t 7 (0 %r N U T (ak `C l (y T*.(-- GOQ PL- What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission? ':� 1 N C e- 1, Am SL) c.�-1 t-\ t,3C--co 1p'-c s , M (-j CAN<-- V, o C �cx� r c t tJ Fo M nrm m L �t i.0 6 i Ntj ESs c'-r S-1-{4-�jc- p PC—iN M tJ 17, u� 4 o — 2-r� 0 dZ l C—(a5 n c i W PIL4 +0(.)i—S7 0 (Z- �'{-}c� U L,-C> ND( ��•T- ri-b Ut,)1 Q��C-(a4 CA C V�3 CL �4 � S poS o t3 T+A'Nk quu (0 �- q 0 0 R CAN '-b PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 29' � 0 CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON ATTACHMENT 3-E Dater I I CITY 0,7 • CITY C:,A. 'CuOT I E LA QUINTA CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION Ij n_„ NAME: HOME ADDRESS: _ I - l Vl ZZ BUSINESS ADDRESS fT_Lq IF EMPLOYED, LIST YOUR EMPLOYER AND POSITION(S) YOU HOLD ,5ELF - Plirrincip R;rhi 7-gr/i '�i_ - J�f i <� c� NAnni ; i'U z LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: `t I211-71tn. —1'y i e- f l r re r 1 HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? n Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other back- ground. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. 299 APPLICATION, CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION ' PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 C1 :J THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT�)J 30n i amia,Xay Pillow, MA LMF7 P.O. Box, 487 La,Qa nta,, CA 92253 &Csketch, etc, I a*m a CA Ux"i4e, mcwrLag& famay psychotherapist I a4o-own6 with, my daughter, a pet greetiru* card, company, M 6w R a ppy M emory Cards My forma.i, edcu ation, is' a 8S in, deaf eda zatton, anal, a, MA Lev ctinicabpsychology. I have, approxirrr atel y 2 0 years rev fund, ra.vsZnW ax perien� arid, have, served, ory board*- kwc- a4- Ea4ter Sea4, Jun%r of Soci a.L Services, St. Theresa, A ca demy, urwversity of San, Diego-}Eigh, School and, Southwestern, CQU.ege, iry Santa, Fes NM. My experience. iry thev v6jtu arts- wa4- a4- a Yale* person, for two- art galleries- iry San. Diego: One, was- a, h%gl v e t& modern, art gallery featurinW ail, "t,ng a* -tints- fro»v ail over the, world, a.nd, the, other wa* Ma.rtLm La wre ic,& Gallery, a, more, corrcrrcerce a b art ga.Uery. I have- been, a coUector of antique* for ma rvy yacwk and, at one, ume, ha.d, a art a.nd, a n tiq"k store- yescrib& your knowtect ge• etc. T & d u -w* of dvt* kind, of would, irwoW& the, a.b:;U ty to- research, ewcplore, ma t nta uv arid, create, ciatural, arty that will, serve• La Quirita now a,nd, tnto-the• fi, Uw& Tht* advi spry postit%n, requires- someone with, courage, cua "i ty and, forte tudre, and, the, everw4& a baity to- communLcat& e f fectAely and, respectfuUy betweewv the, city ands dw, cor►z. y. La, Quinta rs- moving- so -fast and, wityv such, importance: This- city h,a4- the- ca pal—.,aay and, need, to- t,e, atb it ca ry be! Other fa*t deavelop r ng- cities- at some point may u4e, our city a*, a, g exa*nple. a4, how to-procee& to- become. an, idea,i,place. to- "e, work` play. we- are• iry the, early stages of c 1u. xU ood, and, we, need, a, lot of good, parenting- W e- need, peopl& wUly good, hearts- a nd, a, great deg e• to- accomplish : I want to- be, a, part of this- d avei op me nt of La, Quus ta, A we, have- seen, through history, c-4, ttwral. development is- pa ram4o cnt iry sa yirug- who• we- are; what we, beUeve- and, how a comvnurvity will be- affected, and, re ne»zbered,. we, need, to- integrate, the- diversity of the, corrunLxy by integrating- alb diee/ arts, e:g,, v4ua.4 performing, Uterary and, ionk. what speoiftx, attitudes; etc.. I have• a ca*v do• attitudes have• worked, with ma*vy dGverw people. aaid, tea.c;v �osv AZU* I enfoy being -part of a, progress We- group of Hky a.nzb am, energv%.ed, by cultare: I would, Uke, to -see- taw* com*ntmWy have-Che, exposure- to- and, excperien c& of all, the. arts 301 ATTACHMENT 3-F RECEIVED ?Z'n? JU�b Fij 22 CITY 0 nU1�T CITxi IS OFFICE CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON Date:_j U N e 10 O L LA QUINTA CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION NAME: �UAX,��— A, F<C G HOME ADDRESS: rJ3 105 II I. m _ 00� "&., (22j) i <�V2 2Z�3 -34-72 BUSINESS ADDRESS IF EMPLOYED, LIST YOUR EMPLOYER AND POSITION(S) YOU HOLD LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? '1 Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other back- ground. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. AFTER ATTENDING PASADENA CITY COLLAGE, DS, AND ART CENTER _ SCHOOL I WAS EMPLOYED BY CANNELL & CHAFFEN, A COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL INTERIOR FIRM, DESIGNED FURNITURE FOR MARTIN BRATTRUD, MORGANELLI & HEUMAN AS DEPARTMENT HEAD FOR HOTEL AND COUNTRY CLUB INTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL AND INTERIOR DESIGN I THEN OPENED MY OWN DESIGN FIRM SPECIALIZING IN CERAMIC — TILE SHOWROOMS, MEDICAL / OFFICE BUILDINGS AND SOME LARGE RESIDENTIAL WORK. 302 1 ATTACHMENT 3-G P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO Sw"MBnBhterTha"E►,r LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 May 13, 2002 Edwin J. O'Connell P. O. Box 902 La Quinta, CA 92253-0902 Dear Mr. O'Connell: (760) 777-7000 FAX (760) 777-7101 Thank you for notifying me of your inability to attend the City Council interviews for the Cultural Arts Commission. Unfortunately, I am unable to schedule a separate appointment for you to meet with the City Council since it is their policy to conduct interviews at a noticed public meeting. I will, of course, forward your resume to the City Council for their review along with your letter of May 13, 2002. Thank you for your interest in the City of La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission and good luck during the selection process. Sincerely, June S. Greek, CIVIC City Clerk 303 04 RECEIVED t4Ay 13 Fr; I: 33 CI i Y 0 f_;� OUINTA CITY C_t"R6;'S OFFICE P.O. Box 902 La Quinta, CA 92253-0902 May 13, 2002 City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Attention: City Clerk Subject: Cultural Arts Commission I have just received a notice informing me the subject Commission will be conducting interviews at the regularly scheduled City Council meeting during the Business Session at 3:00 p.m. on June 18, 2002. As requested I am notifying the City Clerk I will not be available on June 18th. Is it possible to be interviewed during the periods of May 13th through May 15th, or the period of May 20 through May 31 st. I will also be available the entire week of June 3rd. I apologize for not being able to attend on June 18th. Last week I left a portfolio of my sculpting and photographic accomplishments along with my resume. Please note my address has been changed as indicated above. Sincerely, Edwin J. Q Connell 304 C`iV`f� C.,` ` -L"SOFFICE CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON Date: 1`1 a Y ! ,Z oo _:L LA QUINTA CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION NAME: d6F1),(VyA Jy • C) �o ��✓C Z L HOME ADDRESS: S'o qOS AA0L,,v H1 0 !SJQ A7)r) co.5 Rt) L- P Q , ,vTA CA 92 ZS 3 `i LEASE CS Au. MA,C To L 0. Box q02 (,A N—,e-A-gaJS3- 09M BUSINESS ADDRESS TZ ri-I R E--,) IF EMPLOYED, LIST YOUR EMPLOYER AND POSITION(S) YOU HOLD LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: OV Erb i WIZ &,7X yF,4P, s HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? tJo Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other back- ground. Please be sure"to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. 5 cF tl tSumr A:1 � Ae-4E:i) 305 APPLICATION, CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission. DT E i2 `I rI A rJ U I-4 V` i t7 rZ a -7 ,5- O V- i E C a C--c3 (-? .nr 5S1 aJ ot, aLEi",%kCr - r2 ii S What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? i:(E y d F S� rn IQ Yv NEB -rP��_ ► t� U u►2 C0-.A u NIT G i vy s S A N Ek e C- L C l= !v i d P60 f ZI U (V i �Z, N E E D PLr' 61t0JC2AL4-�Z A l La L0�^K�NL (o t o t i v �,. L r rV � � i t o (� E=- (c) --� ,— Tt}� +-y ry c 71 r, tys i 0-iP- y A, � F ( 12 1 G (Z f 5 What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission? % KNt 1=2ES j t= 4 E 14 r2 S A t L ,7 t N A�17EN CLv i N b+)+10 t-C)12wtBEiZS o F EARN C��b - PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 30�� Resume 2002 Edwin J. O'Connell is a New Englander, born in Holyoke and raised in West Springfield, Massachusetts. He is a graduate of the Springfield Technical High School, the University of Vermont, B. S. M. E., with post graduate work in "Aviation Engine Design " from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He has also completed marketing courses at Northwestern University and Stanford. Mr. O'Connell has always been interested in art, having taken elective courses in high school and college. His business career began in 1946 after having served three and a half years in the U.S. Navy Reserve, mostly in the Pacific theater. His entire business career was spent in business development sector selling products or services to the industrial and private utility industry. His largest sale was 1.8 billion for the procurement, construction, management of construction of two 1100 mw nuclear power plants. Mr. O'Connell retired from the Bechtel Group of Companies in 1982 where he was a partner, V.P. and Manager of Division Business Development. He has been a member of the American Nuclear Society, the Atomic Industrial Forum, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and is registered as a professional Engineer. In the first year of retirement, he expressed an interest in the arts and was invited to become a member of the board of the La Quinta Arts Foundation in La Quinta, California. In 1985 he was elected president of this foundation for a two year term. He served on the board from 1983 to 1990 and again 1994 to 1996. In 1983 Mr. O'Connell thought he would be interested in sculpting although he had never tried it. He began lessons with Kay Henkel of Palm Springs. After completing his first piece in clay, Kay Henkel noticed his innate talents and encouraged him to continue his studies in this area. The following summer was spent in at San Mateo College in Northern California. In an effort to further improve his skills, he attended three semesters at the College of the Desert in Palm Desert, California, where he was encouraged by Professor William Kohl to turn professional. Although his original intent was to follow sculpting as a hobby, he was further encouraged by one of his friends. During a private showing at The La Quinta Country Club for members only, he was asked to sell one of his bronze pieces and thus, Mr. O'Connell's artistic career was started. In 1987, Mr. O'Connell purchased a summer home in Hayden Lake, Idaho and had a studio added to his home. He spent many hours improving his skills. 307 0 IL 2. Most of his pieces are custom ordered and range from sports figures, i.e. golfers, tennis players and dancers. He also has done busts of well known people such as Ellsworth Vines, tennis professional who won Wimbledon in 1932 and Betty Bechtel the wife of Steve Bechtel owner of the Bechtel Group of Companies. He has also studied photography at the College of the Desert in Palm Desert, CA. and has displayed his photos in a gallery in Carmel and in the La Quinta Country Club. He served on the board of College of the Desert Foundation and was President 1989-1990 and 1990-1991. A sample of some of Mr. O'Connell's sculptures are displayed in the white portfolio. Four photographs are also submitted for review . Respectfully, Edwina:' O'Connell Date: a�j f 231e)a, CITY OF LA QUINTA ATTACHMENT 3-H APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION NAME: HOME ADDRESS: ;-- cJ A r BUSINESS ADDRESS a aii IF EMPLOYED, LIST YOUR EMPLOYER AND POSITION(S) YOU HOLD LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA:�s_G�,,1-, HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION r Sul Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement back- ground. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. U C��r ; one,-,�,�i�• �li�a��-� � �nom�� /.��u/ �aw:G4, ( i zz L4 c✓ , �%�J�h.e.0 �iL� Gci• yr' � l.Ct �� - (iit�ia �. iL¢s lirc.� •4 E'a�if �..�' ire �. t 9� �i �,�, Ga,: C�,� 'a'�t c � 42Z- v 040 APPLICATION, CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission. 10 What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? . ,(r '10ft�Gt%GwP. r! O aspe7� �L�i�of.otr epJ`S4G.-✓6y- • enhance the work of the La Quinta Cultural Arts Commission? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS - 0 FROM LA QUINTA CITY CLERK FRX ND. : 7607777107 Jun. 06 20M 03:42PM P3 4-A Ua1e: CITY OF LA QUINTA OFFICE S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ' /V ru NAME' HOME ADDRESS. . 1 BUSINESS ADDRESS S / SV -Slly •--.50 IF EMPLOYE, LIST YOUR EMPLOYER AND POSITION(S) YOU HOLD LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA. -'L HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? back- ground. c Please sure) to ngeducation. I work clude experiences opv�'ant to duties of the position you seek. ground. Ple J / L ZL12 fl/1 �lG' 311 FROM : LA MJINTA CITY CLERK FAX N0. : 7607777107 Jun. 06 2002 03:43PM P4 APPLICATION, HISTORIC PRFSERVATION COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions. regulation. duties and rroccaures of the La Quinta Historic Commission. I , , Wree members of the Commission shall be appointed from among professionals in the disciplincs of architecture..nj�tory, architectural history. platuting, or other historic preservation -related disciplines, such as urban planning, American studies, American civilization, cultural geogaphy. ur cultural anthropology. Meage explain which epecirie discipline yuallfies you for appointinettt. Two members of the Commission shall he lay mctnbers who have demonstrated special interest. competent:e. experience or knowledge in hisinrie preservation, American studies. cultural anthropology, cultural geography, or other hisaOric prescrvati()n-related disciplines. Please explain your special interest/experience/knowledge ag a lay metnber. Le FROM LA OUIHTA CITY CLERK FAX NO. : 7607777/07 Jun. 06 2002 03:43PM P5 APPLICATION, HISTORICAL PRESIERVATION COMMISSION PAGE 3 Wf+et speciiiC attitudes,Historic Preseration Con mlSsigrl? lls and/of dvYou hahavewhich would ennence the work of sto J�))/-, PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF LA QUINTA P. O. BOX 1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 313 LESLIE J. MOURIQUAND HUDSON 69-945 Pinesmoke Rd. Mountain Center, CA 92561 Mailing: P. O. Box 921 La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 349-9421 Home (760) 398-3102 Work email: crmiady@aol.com aol.com EDUCATION 1992 Master of Arts, Anthropology, California State University, Fullerton. Thesis Title: Planning for Community Archaeology: It's Applications to The Eastern Coachella Valley. (Leslie J. Mouriquand-Blodgett) 1983 Bachelor of Science, Anthropology/Geography, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. Emphasis on Cultural Anthropology, California Archaeology, and Regional Geography. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Seventeen years of increasingly responsible professional experience in Urban/Environmental Planning and Cultural Resource Management. September 2001 — Present City of Coachella Community Development Department Susan Williams, Director 1515 Sixth Street Coachella, CA 92236 (760) 398-3102 Title: Associate Planner • Prepare environmental documents for development and capitol improvement projects. • Conduct cultural resource investigations and reviews • Review development, subdivision, and use permit applications. October 2000 — September 2001 Title: Planner III County of Riverside Transportation & Land Management Agency — Planning Division Robert Lyman, Regional Agency Manager 82-675 Highway 111, 21 Floor, Room 209 Indio, CA 92201 (760) 863-7873 • Performed development, land division, and use permit reviews and project processing. • Review and coordination of Environmental Impact Reports/Statements and project management. • Preparation of Environmental Assessments. • Review of cultural resource management reports, including mitigation development and coordination. July 1992 — October 2000 Title: Associate Planner City of La Quinta Community Development Department Jerry Herman, Director 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 777-7125 • Performed development, land division, and use permit reviews and project processing, Specific Plans, General Plan Amendments, Zone Changes, Ordinances, etc. • Reviewed and coordinated Environmental Impact Reports and project management. • Prepared Environmental Assessments and Mitigation Monitoring Plans. • Staff support to the La Quinta Historic Preservation Commission. • Presentations to the City Council, Planning Commission, Historic Preservation Commission, and Director's Hearings, and Architectural and Landscape Design Committee. • City representative to the CVAG Coachella Valley Habitat Conservation Policy Advisory Group. • Research and writing of City's Historic Context Statement and Preservation Plan and Grant documents. • Conducted archival research, field surveys, site testing, and report preparation and review. Coordination wit 15 archaeologists and other environmental experts for specific development projects. • Created educational public displays in City exhibit case. October 1991 - July 1992: City of Palm Springs Planning & Zoning Department Doug Evans, Director 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92263 Title: Planner II - Environmental • Prepared and reviewed environmental documents. • Special Projects - research and report writing. • Staff support to the Parks, Open Space & Trails (POST) Foundation • Staff liaison to the Agua Caliente Tribal Council. • Served as City archaeologist. Prepared and reviewed archaeology reports. • City representative to the Coachella Valley Association of Governments - Environment and Technology Committee. July 1991 - October 1991: Title: Planner Terra Nova Research & Planning John & Nicole Criste 275 N. El Cielo Palm Springs, CA 92263 • Prepared Environmental Assessments. • Prepared and managed planning and development projects. • Performed contract municipal current and advanced planning duties for the City of Desert Hot Springs. • Served as staff archaeologist, reviewing archaeology reports for form and content, appropriateness of mitigation/treatment. January 1990 - April 1991: Riverside County Planning Department Paul Clark, Principal Planner 79-733 Country Club Drive Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 Title: Planner I & Planner II • Performed development, use permit, and land division reviews and project processing. • Prepared environmental assessments to meet state and federal requirements. • Presentations before the East Area Planning Council, County Planning Commission, and Planning Director Hearings. • Prepared the award -winning Cahuilla Hills Area Development Study. • Research for policy and ordinance development. • Researched and answered public inquiries. • Served as staff archaeologist. Prepared and reviewed cultural resource management archaeology reports. June 1985 - February 1990 Leslie Mouriquand-Blodgett, Consultant 3077 N. Shasta Pomona, CA 91768 Title: Archaeologist- Principal Investigator - Consultant • Consultant to environmental planning firms for the preparation of archival research, environmental studies, Cultural Resource Management Plans, field reconnaissance surveys, opportunity and constraints studies, mitigation plans for over 40 projects in many locations in Southern California. GRADUATE ASSISTANTSHIPS 1985 - 1987 California State University, Fullerton, Department of Anthropology. Research and Teaching Assistant (four semesters) AWARDS AND GRANTS 1996 Certificate of Recognition - "Outstanding Local Cultural Resource Management Program". Awarded by Association of Environmental Professionals - Inland Empire Chapter. 1990 Riverside County Planning Department Merit Award: "Cahuilla Hills Area Development Study". 1988 California State University, Fullerton - Organizational Award: Founding President of Lambda Alpha National Anthropology Honor Society- Eta of California Chapter. 317 1987 California State University, Fullerton - Department of Anthropology Writing Competition: Best Student Paper for "The Burial Practices of the Elite: Missouri - Illinois Hopewell." 1987 Jenkins, Douglas, Gardner Memorial Research Grant Award: "Prehistoric Clay Figurines of California." 1986 CSUF Departmental Association Council Research Grant: "Prehistoric Clay Figurines of California." MEMBERSHIPS AND APPOINTMENTS Society for California Archaeology (SCA) Lambda Alpha National Honor Society for Anthropology - Eta of California Chapter, founding President Coachella Valley Archaeological Society (CVAS) -Symposium Committee Chair 1996-2002, Newsletter Editor 1999, President 1998, 1999, Occasional Papers Editor 2002. Archaeological Survey Associatior (ASA) American Rock Art Research Association (ARARA) Malki Museum Association Association of Environmental Professional (AEP) Joshua Tree National Park Advisory Commission - Commissioner 7/97 to 7/04; (Appointed by Secy. of the Interior Bruce Babbitt) ACTIVITIES Participant/Author - Project Archaeology, curriculum development for elementary and middle school students. Cahuilla Chapter. Department of Defense, Curriculum Development Program. 1996-1997 Invited Speaker - elementary school talks on local archaeology. Organizer - Historic Preservation Workshop, sponsored by the City of La Quinta, November, 2, 1996. Contributor/Co-Editor - Coachella Valley Archaeological Society Newsletter, (Articles, News briefs, etc.). Invited Organizer/Leader - American Planning Association Conference Mobile Workshop on Coachella Valley Archaeology and Cultural Resource Management, October 3, 1996. Invited Speaker - Historic Preservation Workshop, sponsored by the State Office of Historic Preservation, January 24; 1997, El Centro, California. Invited Speaker - Palm Desert High School, Advanced Drafting Class, "Archaeology and the Planning Process", April 8, 1997. 318 Organizer/Master of Ceremonies - "First Symposium on the Archaeology of the Coachella Valley and Adjacent Areas Coachella Valley Archaeological Society, May 3, 1997, La Quinta, California. State Archaeology Week Event. Speaker, SCA Southern Data Sharing Meeting, Oct. 18, 1997, paper presented - "Cultural Resource Management in La Quinta". Invited Speaker - Indio Soroptomist Club, Nov. 20, 1997, "Cultural Resource Management in La Quinta". Invited Speaker - Society for American Archaeology Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, March 27, 1998, Symposium title: The Power of Local Preservation Law; Paper title: "A Tale of Two Cities: La Quinta Then, and Now". Invited Speaker - Carter School, Palm Desert, CA. 2nd graders, "Archaeology and Indians," May 28, 1998. Instructor - Coachella Valley Archaeological Society, Basic Archaeological Training Course, "State Archaeology Laws and CEQA", December 3, 1998, Torres -Martinez Tribal Hall. Facilitator - California Preservation Foundation Annual Conference Planning Committee, 1999. Conference Educational Tract on Archaeology, May, 1999, Palm Springs, CA. Facilitator/Mistress of Ceremonies/Speaker - "2"d. 3`d, 0. Sth, and 6th Annual Symposium on the Archaeology of the Coachella Valley & Adjacent Areas," Coachella Valley Archaeology Society, 1998 to 2002, Desert Museum, Annenberg Theater or Lecture Hall, Palm Springs, California. State Archaeology Week event. Invited Speaker - Coachella Valley Historical Museum Docents Luncheon, "Current Issues in CRM", January 19, 1999. Invited Speaker - Body of Christ Church, "Local Geology, Archaeology & Cahuilla Culture", Torres -Martinez Indian Reservation, numerous dates as invited, 2000-2001. Invited Speaker - Volunteers in Mission/Body of Christ Church, "Local Geology, Archaeology & Cahuilla Culture", Torres -Martinez Indian Reservation, January 20, 2002. Invited Public Participant- Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument - Cultural Resources Working Group, 2002. 319 ti :i RECENT PUBLICATIONS 1998 "Archaeological Site Protection in La Quinta, California." In CRM, Vol. 21 (10), pp. 18-19. (Other publications upon request) WORKSHOPS - SPECIAL TRAINING Jan. 17, 1997 Historic Resources after an Earthquake. CPF Workshop. Palm Springs, CA. Nov. 20, 1997 Historic Preservation Workshop, City of La Quinta May 25-27, 1993 Introduction to Federal Projects and Historic Preservation Law (Certificate of Completion) Annually CEQA Update Seminars MUSEUM -EXHIBIT EXPERIENCE 1993 — 2000 City of La Quinta. Public Display Case in Civic Center Foyer. Curated and prepared exhibits on various topic (local history and archaeology, historic maps, earthquake preparedness, etc., for public and staff education. 1983 El Monte Historical Museum, El Monte, CA Performed curation duties, and exhibit construction. Paid staff (5 months) 1981 San Gabriel Mission Museum, San Gabriel, CA. Student internship program (1 college quarter) Coordinated student internship program with museum. 1981 Malki Museum, Morongo Reservation, Banning. Student volunteer. Summer season. 1980 Anthropology Museum, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ Student participation in conjunction with Museum Studies class. Researched and constructed exhibit on the skeletal effects of sickle cell anemia in humans under supervision of Charles Merbs, Ph.D. 320 fit; PERSONAL INTERESTS 12 years of Classical dance training (French Ballet, Polynesian, Jazz, Middle Eastern) Lifelong equestrienne Designer and collector of handmade ethnic jewelry, beadwork, & Southwestern tribal arts Aviation TRAVEL EXPERIENCES 1975 Holland, France, Luxemburg, Czechoslovakia, Greece, Italy, Austria, Germany - 6 weeks, People to People Student Ambassador Program 1970's, '80's & '90's American Southwest, Canada, Mexico, Continental United States - several trips 1993 Maui, Hawaii 2002 France 321 �� f RECEIVED ?CC? JUN - 5 PN 1: 0 S CITY OF LA QUINTA JV;ZjLLLg:L 6�- Date: CITY Or LA QUINTA CITY C L E R � ' S OFFICE APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NAME: ,lc / ,/ HOME ADDRESS: BUSINESS ADDRESS 52 7 5— A'�= k' Q C�� ,r. £- C c/1. IF EMPLOYED, LIST YOUR EMPLOYER AND POSITION(S) YOU HOLD LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? X C ATTACHMENT 4-13 Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other back- ground. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. A� J/^' 24 6 _C . APPLICATION, HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, duties and procedures of the La Quinta H = toric Commission. s-oPrr e Three members of the Commission shall be appointed from among professionals in the disciplines of architecture, history, architectural history, planning, or other historic preservation -related disciplines, such as urban planning, American studies, American civilization, cultur^! geogaphy, or cultural anthropology. Please explain which specific discipline qualifies you for -►ointment. Two members of the Commission shall be lay members who have demonstrated special interest, competence, experience or knowledge in historic preservation, American studies, cultural anthropology, cultural geography, or other historic preservation -related disciplines. Please explain your special interest/experience/knowledge as a lay member. �'�� r�'1 ��'E'� F�� /•� � �?i_s �l'i��-; �; z i c= ��,� � n lr�:- ; !LL '� r?r� ._ �-E '✓1 � r7� c �� , in �, l7 7V c; 6{_.,0/Tkr tl CW A:* elf rt' APPLICATION, HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMISSION PAGE 3 What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the Historic Preservation Commission? `ic^: r, r rl .f PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF LA QUINTA P. 0. BOX 1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 32 The Salaried Employees' Union (HTF) A non -political union for salaried personnel working in the private sector, primarily in commerce, transport and service industries. HTF has over 155.000 members and the primary role is to ensure the security and well-being of its members at the workplace. General Comittee Head Office General Council BO representatives Meets once every second year. (Used to be every 4" year) Representative at 4 different councils District Office for District Council for Stockholm Election Committee for Stockholm County Meets once every year Stockholms District Council. 40.000 members Representative for from 1983 Chairman for 5 yea rsto 2000 Board member for 7 years ---------------------- Network Club ' 5 clubs, 10.000 members --------------------- Chairman for 6 years ; Board member for 10 ; years •---------------------- The Wholesale Trade ' Employees' Club 4.000 members Chairman for 6 years Board member from 1983 0C 327, ve'�vV.w��e. �_ @N� �•ntQ.YV EC- �� ;y ATTACHMENT 5-A Date�� ' �? C l i 0. L '' n U ui T A CITY OF LA QUINTA Ct?`� CLr.;;�5 OFfiCE APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD NAME: Az -pp /Q - ( HOME ADDRESS: BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (HOME) o2/�?-ZBUSINESS) _ IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA:PS, �ittE ,2 q S HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS BOARD? Afp Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other backgr,pund. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. 6 326 067 APPLICATION, INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 32THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT & .-') ATTACHMENT 5-B CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON RECEI\�`D 0 _- 'L I l! 4 �d 7 A r IT Y - s Of FICE LA QUINTA INVESTMENTADVISORY BOARD NAME: KURT MORTENSON HOME ADDRESS: 78595 BRADFORD CIRCLE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 BUSINESS ADDRESS: 74-850 Hwy 111, Indian Wells, Ca 92210 TELEPHONE: (HOME) 760-345-9997 (BUSINESS) 760-340-3700 IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: Prudential Securities, Inc. Senior Vice President — Investments LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 1989 HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS BOARD? I will on 6/12/02 Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. I have been involved in the financial services industry since 1981. Received my bachelor's degree from Concordia College in Moorhead MN and am currently studying to obtain my Certified Financial Planning Accreditation. This is in addition to a variety of continuing education programs required in my field. I served on the Board of Directors at the College of the Desert Foundation and also affiliated with the American Heart Association, YMCA and Child Cornerstone. I am currently a member of the Investment Management Consultants Association, Director's Council at Prudential and designated as a Prestige Private Client Advisor. Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board. It is my understanding that the Advisory Board is primarily an oversight committee with three primary functions. 1) Review account statements to verify accurate reporting 2) monitor compliance with existing investment policy 3) review and make recommendations concerning investment policy and procedures, investment contracts and investment consultants. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Investment Advisory board and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? 0C, Being a La Quinta resident for the last 13 years I have witnessed tremendous growth, with this growth comes increased revenues as well as larger budgets. The need for a more sophisticated approach to fiscal responsibilities is more acute now than it has ever been. What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board? I view a position on the Investment Advisory Board as my opportunity to give something back to the community. What better way than to use the skills and expertise I already have. I write investment policy statements, I review and understand the financial markets, I understand the correlations between different asset classes, and I work with a variety of investments on a daily basis. PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P.O. BOX 1504 78 496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 329 ATTACHMENT 5-C RECEIVED Date 6/5/2002 �0i? JUN I F'rl 30 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY C� LA QUINTA C I T Y C L C R "; ' S O F F I C E APpLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD NAME: ADRIANA F. ROMERO HOME ADDRESS: 53-355 AVE. MENDOZA, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 BUSINESS ADDRESS: 81-955 HWY. 111, STE.#205, INDIO, CA 92201 TELEPHONE: (HOME) (760) 777-1519 (BUSINESS) (760) 342-1609 IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 4 YEARS HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS BOARD? No Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. I AM CURRENTLY A DEBT MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT, I MEET WITH CLIENTS ON AN APPOINTMENT ONLY BASIS IN THE EVENINGS AND ON SATURDAYS. I ALSO WORK AS AN ASSISTANT TO THE COORDINATOR/PRINCIPAL OF THE COUNTY SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAM. I AM A MOTHER OF TWO CHILDREN. I HAVE SOME COLLEGE EDUCATION. I HAVE HELPED AS A VOLUNTEER ON THE ANNUAL RUN FOR READING EVENT HELD AT THE INDIAN WELLS TENNIS GARDENS. PRESENTLY, I WORK IN COLLABORATION WITH A GENTLEMAN FROM AG EDWARDS FINANCIAL FIRM TO SERVE MY CLIENTS NEEDS WITH DEBT, INVESTMENT AND INSURANCE QUESTIONS. I LOOK FORWARD TO BEING GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE IN THIS BOARD. 33n 0C, APPLICATION, INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE ADVISORY BOARDS FUNCTION IS TO REVIEW THE CITIES INVESTMENT POLICY AND ALSO REVIEW THE TREASURERS REPORTS TO SEE THAT GUIDELINES ARE FOLLOWED. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? THE CITY HAS BEEN GROWING AT A RAPID RATE. THE ADVISORY BOARD FACES THE CHALLENGE OF MAKING GOOD AND EDUCATED DECISIONS WHILE INVESTING THEIR FUNDS TO ENSURE SUFFICIENT FUNDING WTT.T. RF. AVAILARTY F FQR PRFSFNT AND FUTURF GROWT14 What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board? I WANT TO CONTRIBUTE IN HELPING THE CITY I LIVE IN PROSPER. WORKING TOGETHER WITH OTHER BOARD MEMBERS TO FIND CREATIVE WAYS TO HELP OUR CITY GROW WILL GIVE ME A VALUABLE LEARNING EXPERIENCE AND HELP THE COMMUNITY I LIVE IN. PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 31 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT ATTACHMENT 6-A RECEIVED 2P', J U N - 3 A10, 3 C CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CL`ZK:'S OFFICE City of La Quinta Application to Serve On La Quinta Planning Commission Name: Jacques Abels Home Address: PO Box 1416, La Quinta, CA Business Address: 49 990 Ave. Montero, La Quinta Date: 05/31 /02 Telephone: (Home) 760 564 4368 (Business) 760 771 3433 Employment: Insurance Broker...Jacques Abels Insurance Services Length of Residence in La Quinta: 33 years Have you ever attended a meeting of this Commission: Yes Biographical Sketch, etc.: University of Denver, 1938 —1941 US Navy, 1941-1945; Rank: Lt. (SG), Submarine Services 6C) Business: Management -Retail, 1945 —19a0; Own business in design & construction, 1960 —1973; Insurance broker, 1973 to present. President, Board of Directors, East Valley YMCA; President, Rotary, 1973; La Quinta Director on CVRD (Coachella Valley Recreation District), 1984 — 1992. Planning Commission: 1994 — present. Chairman three times. In view of the tremendous progress and the amount of development in the stream, I would appreciate serving one more term because of my expertise, knowledge and foresight 332 1 Application, Planning Commission Page 2 for the continuing growth in La Quinta. I am pro -business, and always looking for additional tax dollars for the City. Description of my knowledge of the functions, regulations and procedures of the La Quinta Planning Commission: I have been a member of the Planning Commission for eight years and have a thorough knowledge of the functions, regulations and procedures, knowing that the final decisions end up with the City Council. I always do my best to ensure that the Council will have a better handle on items after their awareness of Planning Commission recommendations. Specific Issues, etc.: I have seen tremendous growth in all areas of the city while being on the Commission, i.e., auto mall, downtown, residential, Washington corridor, the hotel development, high scale restaurants, and many more, and I am proud to be an integral part of this progress. Specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise, etc.: Having lived in La Quinta since 1958 and being part of a laid-back, sleepy community to the position and rank it holds today, I have gained and realized that my position has given me the perspective necessary to be a planning commissioner. I have no hidden agendas, and would appreciate one more term as a planning commissioner. I feel that my continuing efforts and contributions are very important. 333 O'd I' ATTACHMENT 6-13 RECEIVED � r? i U', - 7 F; ; 1: 4 0 CI T Y L ; 0UINTA CITY CLER�:'S OFFICE CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: Tom Kirk HOME ADDRESS: 78-150 Ca/le Cadiz, La Quinta BUSINESS ADDRESS: 78-401 Highway 111, Suite T, La Quinta TELEPHONE (HOME): 564-1452 (BUSINESS) 564-4888 Date June 6, 2002 IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD Salton Sea Authority, Executive Director LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 6 Years HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? Yes Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. Education: University of California, Berkeley, Master of City and Regional Planning, Class Rank #1: University of Califomia, Los Angeles, Bachelor of Arts, Geography, Magna Cum Laude: Trinity College Dublin; Politics/Geography (45 units): University of California, Irvine, Development (12 units): Coro Foundation; Public Affairs Work Experience: Salton Sea Authority Executive Director (4.5 years). CVAG Supervising Director (2.5 )1ears). Land Use/Planning Consultant, Project Manager -The Planning Center (6 years). Independent Consulting for transportation consultant (K. T. Analytics) (1 Year). Research/Teaching. Guest speaker (various land use, transportation and environmental topics). Research of various land use, mass transportation and paratransit issues Awards. American Planning Association awards (national, state, local) Civic Involvement • La Quinta Planning Commissioner ('97--'02). Imperial Irnpation District Power Advisory Committee ('97). Boys Soccer Coach ('95--97). La Quinta Recreation Vehicle Ordinance Committee. (97). La Quinta Rotary Club (701-W) Otherbackground Wife, Julie. Sons, Jake & Gavin. Dog, Nevada. We spend much of our free time either working on the house or camping and other outside activities Play volleyball, basketball and other sports locally. 33A APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations and procedures of the La Quinta Planning Commission. The Commission serves at the will of the City Council and provides recommendations to the Council on a variety of major zoning and general plan matters Additionally, the Commission serves as the final review body for lesser development -related actions My knowledge of the functions, etc, of the Commission is derived, in part, from my five years on the Commission. My experience is buttressed by a significant amount of coursework in planning, environmental and related fields Additionally, I have worked with, or presented to, many planning commissions in other California communities I have updated my knowledge with periodic attendance at planning conferences What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems. One of the biggest challenges facing the city and the planning commission is how best to accommodate future growth. Increasingly growth wit/ be channeled to areas in and near existing neighborhoods The past two years have demonstrated that some infill development will be hotly contested. The Commission will have to respond by ensuring that /nfill and other commercial development in particular is of high quality and demonstrates the ci" commitment to excellent urban design Quality urban design and efficient roads must be the focus in the coming months and years The commission is likely to be under increasing pressure to reject or significantly limit /nfrll development. It will be important for the commission to treat developers who have met the letter and intent of the city's general plan and zoning code fairly, even while demanding quality design and planning. On the other side of the equation, it is equally important to treat angry, and all other, residents who stand or sit before the Commission with respect. They deserve it. What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? If fortunate enough to be re -appointed, 1 provide to the Commission a fair degree of understanding of the planning process, a good dose of common sense, a commitment to quality and a healthy respect for private property rights and the challenges developers face in the approval process 1 also respect the democratic process and due process and the rights of residents to speak their minds I do listen well and try my best to understand the concerns raised by the sophisticated professional, the irate layperson and everyone in between. PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P.O. BOX 1504 78496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 33 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT V ;�;cL, Date: May 2, 2002 ATTACHMENT 6-C Rt CEIVEG CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE A, v - �' �' 2 3 "; ON CI i Y "': CJIi:TA LA QUINTA PLANNING COMAIIIISSlW ,; ' S 0 F F I C E NAME: ROBERT T. TYLER HOME ADDRESS: 44-215 VILLETA DRIVE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253-3871 BUSINESS ADDRESS: NONE (RETIRED) TELEPHONE: (HOME) (760) 345-2116 (FAX) (760) 345-2717 EMPLOYMENT: Retired from the Lockheed Corporation (now the Lockheed Martin Company) in mid-1990. LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 10-1 /2 years (I am a registered voter and vote re u�� larly). HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? Yes. Since my initial WMintment to the Planning_ Commission in January 1996 and reappointments in June 1998 and 2000, I have attended nearly all regular meetinns plus a number of special meetings and Joint meetings with the City Council. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH: I hold a BA Degree (UCLA 1951) a BS ( Engineering) Degree (USC - 1961) plus post graduate engi�n'eerins studies at UCLA I was a professional engineer in the Aerospace industry for over thirty-five years. Although my degree was in Electrical Engineering, my Lower Division curriculum included a significant amount of Civil Engineering Thus I am conversant with the various engineering disciplines related to community_planning__ During_my tenure on the Planning Commission, I have continuously updated my knowledge base with regard to many -aspects of City Government plus Federal, State and local statutes relating to city pt� lanning and land use functions The City has sponsored my attendance at several sessions of the annual League of California Cities Planners Institute as well as to a number of local planning -related seminars. The City has also provided me with numerous pertinent reference documents including the La Quinta General Plan. the La Quinta Zoning Code, and CEOA I have regularly devoted several hours per month studying all pending Planning Commission issues and visiting all of the related sites so that I could objectively participate in each Public Hearing and Business Session as an informed Commissioner. During FY 98-99 I served as the Chair of the Planning Commission. Because I am fully retired I have no pgtential business -related conflict of interest situations. Other current volunteer activities include representing La Quinta as Vice -Chairman of the Palm Springs International Airport Commission teaching at the La Quinta Senior Center, and being a Foster Parent. Pre,,;--)usly. I briefly served on the La Quinta Human Services Commission; was Co -Director of the Greater Co -chella Valley Soap Box Derby for its first five annual races; and represented the City on the IID Power Consumers Advisory Committee for approximately three years. 3 3 r r.� APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION - ROBERT T. TYLER PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations and procedures of the La Quinta Planning Commission. Having served on the Planning Commission for the past several years, I have become thoroughly conversant with its functions regulations and procedures The PlggWM Commission provides an advisory fiuiction to the City Council, but has no contracting authority per se. Nearly all actions taken by the Planning Commission go to the City Council for review and final approvalldisapproval. All Planning Commission decisions can be appealed to the City Council. In accordance with the Brown Act, all meetings and hearings of the Planning Commission must be open to the public. Under California law, the Planning Commission, in conjunction with the Community Development StaiE develops and maintains the Cites General PlanThe most recent General Plan Update was adopted by the City Council on March 20, 2002, and involved two or three years of concerted effort by Staff Consultants Planning Commission and City Council, plus extensive public input. The Cay Council may also task the Planning Commission with specific responsibilities relative to Zoning Regulations and Subdivision regulations. The Planning Commission works closely with the Community Development Staff, and relies on Staff Reports prepared for each agendized item. The Planning Commission also receives recommendations from the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee, as additional decision -making resource material. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission, and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? La Quinta is one of the fastest growing cities in California, with rapidly changingdemographics. City population has more than doubled in the past ten years, and its current population has a median age in the low 30's. The City must strike a balance between continued growth, and maintainingthe the expected quality of life of its residents. La Quinta needs additional economic development, including "clean" light industry and affordable hotels, for increased tax revenue. A current key issue is the logical annexation of adjacent properties, as discussed during preparation of the recently updated General Plan. Periodic informal meetings between the City Council, the ALRC, and the Planning_ Commission have been helpful to communicate the City's goals and objectives among all three organizations. These meetings should be continued. What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? During my tenure on the Planning Commission, I have assiduously studied all issues that have come before us, and have made it a point to visit each and every related project site. I tend to be a stickler for details. Each vote I've cast as a Planning Commissioner has been based upon my careful consideration of available facts - Staff Report, personal review, Public Hearing input - rather than emotion. Hopefully, my past voting record and other involvements as a Planning commissioner have contributed to the long term betterment of our beautiful City. n PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION NO LATER THAN JUNE 10, 2002 TO: 3 37) z LA QUINTA CITY CLERK S" ATTAtHMENt 63 REC-!`,!En Date S —.;I- X — , � CITY OF LA QUINTA T 0`IT ! Gt1�TA OFFICE APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION �._ MUT IA S/"L"' / HOME ADDRESS: �.2- �? _ (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (HOME) (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: T%'Sf�- HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the nnc;t;nn vn„ cssnY APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Planninc Commission. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have an) suggestions to address those issues or problems? What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: • CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMEfS9 RECEIVED ?nr.� JUG CITY Lx QUINTA CITY C!_F,r.;-;'S OFFICE U 3- Date a ATTACHMENT 6-E CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME:._ R;C-1.11,0.is HOME ADDRESS: �l9 _ � �{,� Rpr,ncb,o �,p �•-,}�,�?.e,��D�� ►��.,.� , � 3d�3 (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: QSO S, de`,,o��c ttab9 1 Cry S 1�. TELEPHONE: (HOME) C"-+6 6) .�-6 y- 9 3 93 (BusIIVEss> (3 i �') a,4 $ - 3, ba IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: MaAA, , HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? t'4 n Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. 1x-r-NeD -1 r' e A n S 4 A-Q&� - tl S MC_ 1e'il 3 - 1°17 340 W- APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Plan Commission. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have suggestions to address those issues or problems? L....O.d..� �C.C►. h o . a i ind _ c.lnn�. IS �r1 :.a c _ tflLt� �1�t CJI`: yr $R 6Ga Iaq i L1r� Gt?�►si' 2�w �ua �� 1i C:Q1 lac - �r �• �aA.�a.o► ,Qo.��...11 r.1�,n. Lo►D:, ��.•.� 1.�a�.�la.,8 I�lii)E q�_DP.oD L�� +LQ iM.< 44-a/LL. v � � What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 341 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT, off, ATTACHMENT 6-F Robert and Carol Emmons RE C E I V E G 80-560 Weiskopf Way i^^ �•.� Y v t, j I La Quinta, CA 92253 y y (760) 564-1449 CITY OF L 4 Q U i;4 T A CITY OFFICE May 27, 2002 Ms. June Greek City Clerk P.O. Box 1504 78-496 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Application to Serve on La Quinta Planning Commission Dear June: Enclosed is my completed application to serve on the La Quinta Planning Commission. As we discussed, I will be out of the state from June 4 through June 19th. Hopefully, the city council will provide me with an opportunity to interview following my return. Respectfully, Carol Emmons Enclosure 34^ 08 Date: May 27, 2002 CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: Carol Emmons HOME ADDRESS: 80560 Weiskopf Way La Quinta, CA 92253 BUSINESS ADDRESS: None TELEPHONE (HOME): (760) 564-1449 (BUSINESS): None IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: Retired LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 1 % yrs full-time resident; 4 yrs part-time HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? No Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. Occupation: Certified Public Accountant Education: BS Accounting, Magna Cum Laude, California State University, Northridge, 1985 MS Taxation, California State University, Fullerton, 1995 Certificate in Interior Design, Interior Design Institute, Newport Beach, 2001 Work Experience: Over 12 years of experience in public accounting. Retired from PricewaterhouseCoopers as a Tax Senior Manager in October 2000. Developed strategies for clients in acquisition planning and restructuring designed to maximize tax benefits; performed tax due diligence activities related to the acquisition of numerous entities, and assisted clients to successfully integrate the acquired company into the overall company structure. Managed overall global tax compliance and tax minimization efforts, and evaluated strategies available to achieve maximum benefit, including cost segregation studies, R & D credit studies, transfer pricing documentation, and state tax planning. Assisted clients with FAS 109 interpretation and reporting, 4 3, �� requirements, and successfully represented numerous clients undergoing federal and state income tax audits. Having recently retired from public accounting, the opportunity has presented itself to pursue a life-long passion in design. Completed a Certificate in Interior Design from the Interior Design Institute in Newport Beach in December 2001, and elected to continue and pursue a degree. Study requirements include space planning, architectural drafting, design theory, building codes, color theory, and history of architecture. Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Planning Commission. Reviewed the enacting ordinance for the planning commission. No other documentation has been received or reviewed at this time. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? It is my understanding that the City of La Quinta is one of the five fastest growing cities in California. With the recent influx of residents and businesses, there are many challenges facing the city to balance the demands of an ever-growing population with an appropriate vision for a developing city. Assuming the city council has articulated their vision for the city in a formal vision statement, the question is whether or not the existing overall city plan accomplishes the goals set forth in that vision statement. Further, when reviewing applications from businesses to develop property, does the current city planning commission take into account whether or not such proposed development meets the goals of the city's vision statement, and the effect that such proposal will have on the overall city plan? Currently, many residents of La Quinta are questioning whether or not a vision statement for the city exists, and if it does exist, does it reflect the quality of life desired by the La Quinta residents. Further, many residents are concerned that the Highway 111 corridor is being poorly developed. Examples given include the gas station and fast food restaurants at Happy Point, and current plans to build a 99 Cent Store next to Home Depot. Development in such a fashion may devalue the city to a point where the city may lose its ability to attract the types of businesses and establishments constructed at the recently completed development in Rancho Mirage known as "The River". The lost potential of such premium land is palpable, and its impact on future development will affect the citizens of La Quinta for many years to come. The expression that, "Rancho Mirage gets The River and La Quinta gets the 99 Cent Store", is being heard throughout the city, and needs to be addressed before it is too late to change course. One suggestion would be to have an overall review of both the vision statement and the current overall city plan. Such a review will require the city council and planning commission to look afresh at what type of city we want for our residents, and the impact that any proposed development will have on future city plans. Further, the city should consult with other cities in the area, such as Palm Desert, Indian Wells and Rancho Mirage, to determine what kind of problems they have encountered and how those problems can be avoided in the future. Much can be learned from these cities, which have had many successes and few failures. 344 What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quints, Planning Commission? i have always believed that it is important to keep focused on your goals, and not to get lost in the details. Further, compromise is sometimes 7fie only way to get things accomplished, and is appropriate to remove stumbling blocks on the road to success. Although I have always been a high achiever, I have always been a team player and have always consulted with those around me. Consensus is important so that all members of the team can commit to accomplishing the goal. My professional work experience with two of the Big 5 accounting firms, i.e., PricewaterhouseCoopers and Ernst & Young, have prepared me to meet any challenge presented with professionalism and courtesy. My expertise in understanding complex situations and analyzing solutions, I believe, would enhance the work of the La Quinta Planning Commission. tYo'1'��iC�1 tO-Co-'O� ATTACHMENT 6-G Date: Thurs ,QEAWK,2002 JUG -6 F( -2: 38 City Of La Quinta APPLICATION TO SERVE CIm LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: M. Allan O Neil HOME ADDRESS: 78-515 Avenida Ultimo La Quinta CA, 92253 CITY OF LA CUIWA CITY CL-ERK'S OFFICE (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City) BUSINESS ADDRESS: Resort Communications 51-455 Desert Club Drive La Quinta CA, 92253 TELEPHONE: (HOME) 760-771-5525 (BUSINESS) 760-771-2295 IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: President and Owner of Resort Communications. LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 6 Years in La Quinta and 12 years in the Desert HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING. OF THIS COMMISSION? No Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. I am a La Quinta business owner, I live, work and invest in the city of La Quinta. I own a building in the Commercial Village, a house in Desert Club Estates and two rental homes in the cove. I have recently put a deposit to purchase a Casitas at the New Embassy Suites on Calle Tampico. I have a lot invested in my community. I am a member of the Builders Industry Association (Desert chapter) and am a member of the new membership committee. My communications business has been growing very strong since its inception in 2000. I currently employ 15 and have recently started a new Dry Utility division, which will double my current number of employee's. I have two years of General Education at Mt. San Jacinto Community College in San Jacinto California. My business experience and my real estate investments have kept me very in tune with new construction here in the valley. I would like to become more involved in our growing community and I believe the best way for me to contribute and stay in tune with the local growth is by becoming part of the planning commission. 346 083 APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions,'regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Planning Commission. I believe the functions, regulations and procedures of the planning commission are to review all new projects, making sure they meet the local ordinances, zoning laws and the theme or best interest of the community and the City of La Quinta. The duties may include visiting proposed sites and or alternative locations to ensure the proper zoning and local ordinances. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? One specific problem the La Quinta Planning Commission faces is the rapid growth of our community. In conjunction with the city government, the planning commission should encourage careful and planned growth to ensure our way of life, keeping our community a place of envy in the Coachella Valley. What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? I believe in growth and enhancing our way of life, but in a careful and planned manner. .I plan on being in this community for many years to come, so I know the decisions I help the planning commission make today affect our future and the future of our community for my children. I know I will be a committed and enthusiastic member of the planning commission because I want very much to be involved in what happens in our local community. PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P.O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GO VERNMENT 347 ATTACHMENT 6-H Due May 16, 2002 RECEIVED CrrY OF LA QUINTA ? KA Y 17 A;1 -S 2 APPLICATION TO S11s:RV# 1 7 Y 0 r L' QUINTA ON TY CLE Y'S OFFICE LA QUIIVTA PLANIUNG COhD41MION NAME: Lawrence P. Rogoway (Larry) HOME ADDRESS: 48905 Avenida El Nido La Quinta (Mast be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: Same TELEPHONE: (HOME) 1564-3146 (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: Self employed (home office) as sole proprietor providing expert 564-3146 witness and consulting services involving civil engineering issues. LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: < 6 years HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? Yes Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. BS Civil Engineering (1954) Oregon state University. Completed 113 of Masters Program. Two years active duty military service and five years active reserve duty as Seabee Officer. Two years at City of Los Angeles designing sanitary sewers and storm drains. Joined small civil engineering consulting and design firm in 1959 retiring from the position of President/CEO in 1997. Have provided forensic services noted above commencing in 1978 while with my firm and then solely since leaving. Served on 3 condominium association boards between 1973 & 1985. Board member and president of neighborhood community association from 1969 to 1972. Served on citizens advisory group to city planning commission for development of community master plan recommendations to -city council. Chaired steering committee of the group. Active in national professional society affairs for approximately 18 years, serving on various committees and chairing Small Firms Council for two years. Currently completing second year of second two year term on the Civil Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to the state board of professional registration. U APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Plannin Commission. During my professional career I have appeared before several Planning Commissions in Southern California on behalf of clients. The Planning Commission's responsibility is to assure compliance with existing zoning regulations and ordinances by reviewing staff reports and conducting public hearings on proposed developments in order to develop conditions of approval for submission to the City Council for final project approval. I am not currently expert in any of the special peculiarities in the La Quinta codes and ordinances. What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have an suggestions to address those issues or problems? Issues of noise, dirt/dust (air quality), traffic, light pollution along with preservation of the mountains and views are concerns that must be addressed as our City continues to experience population growth and expanded commercial, recreational and residential pressures. These issues must be sensibly integrated with the demands they place on current and proposed infrastructure and with residents wishes for more and better services. What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance th work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? Nearly all of my professional career has been in the development arena as a civil engineer providing site development design and consulting services in connection with residential, commercial, industrial and institutional projects ranging in size and scope from (at the outset) simple gas stations to major horse racing facilities, museums (the new Getty), large regional retail centers, educational facilities and large office complexes (Fluor). My experience in and with homeowner groups as well as multiple planning and legislative bodies and developers of a wide array of project types I believe, can provide a broad perspective to the City of La Quinta. PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 349 UL`' �I 0-V I,-)\ c-a' W. RECEIVED f!AY 2 �- Ai I 1127 CITY' I T`:' OF LA O U I FBI T A CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CLF -fl"'S OFFICE NAME: INQ30 Date ffuz i APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION ATTACHMENT 6-1 (Must be a La Quints resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (HOME) (BUSINESS),c IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA:t. HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. O 7 / & Z- �12, 7 If jq 350 L C.F APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Planninc Commission. -2 / � What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have any suggestions to address those issues or problems? What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNME 5) !' eve r.�.e o vfiJ/o a ATTACHMENT 6-1 LEONARD S. BUSTOS Saturday, May 04, 2002 Mr. Jerry Herman La Quinta City Hall 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Application for Planning Commission Dear Jerry: Thank you for this opportunity to apply for a position on the planning commission. Please find enclosed my application and resume detailing my qualifications for this position. If you have any questions, please feel free to call at any of the numbers listed below. -1 TT 7= N -- M r M -7 < C c M 0D rn m 352 44-850 Seeley Drive, La Quinta, CA. 92253 Phone - 760-345-2877 - Fax - 760-345-2685 - E-mail — lsbustos@hotmail.com Date Mu q , Zoo CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION Q". -3V :; HOME ADDRESS: L} L4 - �35n S ce (Mast be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: 4 4- ssn St'c ii . L..t_ 6L1 i, n TELEPHONE: (HOME) :7(aj -2 q 5-Z E 11 (BUSINESS) 71o6-3 4 !9'-8 3 3 (n IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 5 HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. = N ` - F1 n� r m 3S19 APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Planninc What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have an) suggestions to address those issues or problems? What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMEN;54 444150 Seeley Drive Phone 760-345-8336 La Quinta, CA 62253 Fax 760-345.2685 Cell 760-333-2076 E-mail Ibusoos®do.moom Leonard S. Bustos Olrjec"M To acquire a position on the La Quinta Planning Commission where my masters degree in Public Administration and nearly 20 years of experience in commercial real estate development will be an asset in determining the future planned growth and continuing aesthetic quality of one of the finest communities in the country. My involvement in community activities; including coaching and board member positions in little league baseball and football, chamber of commerce membership and board member positions on Indian Springs Homeowners Association demonstrate my ongoing interest in the well- being of La Quinta. summary of 11-99 to Present Bustos Real Estate Services La Quinta, Ca. qualifications Broker Owner • Began own brokerage firm • Purchase and rehabilitate properties • Compiled a comprehensive database of all local businesses that includes the ability to segregate data into various categories. 10-98 to 11-99 Lyle Commercial Indian Wells, California Broker Associate • Solicited national and local tenants for shopping certers • Solicited national and local tenants for office projects • Performed financial analysis and arranged financing for buyers • Drafted purchase agreements, lease offers and lease documents for tenants and buyers • Initiated a multiple listing service program for the Desert Association of Commercial Realtors • Board member of the Desert Association of Commercial Realtors 9-96 to 3-98 Bank of Commerce San Diego, California Business Development Officer • Solicited SBA Commercial Real Estate Loans for businesses throughout Riverside County by developing and maintaining relationships with all commercial real estate agents in the area • Accumulated information and drafted reports for potential borrowers • Analyzed complex doccrnentation for the purpose of qualifying borrowers and packaging their loans • Coordinated the efforts of up to 25 different associates to facilitate dosing and funding of loans 355 • introduced computer programs and methods to streamline operations 9-93 to 6-96 Ashwill Associates Industry, Ca. Senior vice President • Sold over $12,000,000 of real estate in 1994 • Performed complex Buy vs. Lease analyses, often using creative financing techniques • Ranked second in sales in a field of over 25 agents • Introduced new software database programs • Recruited, trained and motivated new agents 3-83 to 9-93 Daum Commercial Real Estate Industry, Ca. Assistant Branch Manager • Assisted in opening branch office in City of Industry • Averaged over $100,000 in commissions 5 years in a row • Three time President's Club member (an elite group of top agents) • Obtained the number one ranking status in a company of 14 branch offices • Recruited, trained and motivated new agents Education 9-76 to 6-78 San Diego State University San Diego, Ca. Master of Public Administration • 3.5 Grade Point Average • Twice achieved Dean's Honor Roll 9-75 to 6-76 San Diego State University San Diego, Ca. Bachelor of Arts • 3.1 Grade Pant Average • Vice President of Mecha 9-72 to 6-75 United States Intemational University San Diego, Ca. Conti used Education • 3.0 Grade Point Average • Acquired football scholarship Member of Alpha Mu Gamma (Foreign Language Honor Society) 9-69 to 6-72 Victor Valley Junior College Victorville, Ca. Associate of Arts • Freshman Gass President • Co -Captain of football team • Captain of wrestling team • Sports Editor of college newspaper �,.% 5jr 6 Relevant Partial list of personal development and sales training courses completed: • Anthony Robbins • Dale Carnegie • PSS (Professional Selling Skills) • Jim Rohn • Max Sachs International • Mike Ferry • Brian Tracey • Tom Hopkins • Roger Dawson • Robert Allen • Gil Cargil Additional • Board Member of Desert Commercial Realtors professional • Member of Business Network of the Desert activities • Former member of Chambers of Commerce in Palm Springs, Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage, La Quinta and Indio • Licensed California Real Estate Broker Languages • English • Spanish • Former member of Board of Directors for Junior All Amerim Football Carrinwnifty • Former Football Coach for Junior All American Football (3 years) activities • Former Baseball Coach for Palm Desert La Quinta Little League (5 years) • Soccer Coach for La Quinta AYSO (1 year) • Board member of Indian Springs Homeowners Association • Family —Two sons 12 and 16 years old; two grown children Interests and • Computers - Proficient in: actwdies o Word o Excel o Publisher o Act o VVInfax o The intemet and countless other basic software programs • Health and Fitness • Sports • Reading • Politics References Available upon request 357oo RECEIVED Date s/j Ldz ATTACHMENT 6-K C IT Y u- L -1 u' i I N T A CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CL^:�`;'S OFFIC PLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: 126eis T i-6( 4A►*j HOME ADDRESS: 4A-g10 C6btk--t;LA -Di2, LA 01jiuTA, Ca 412253 (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: 414 TELEPHONE: (HOME) (BUSINESS) "4 IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: 1ZE?id t) LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: _ S y2S HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? N0 Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. B.A. la guSmieSS AOml^ tl rKr 7iW $PWT 3S �Pzs /N -1'LA6V 1Sro ;0 i ss D U sm STAC r N h K St Sw� nti1, 7A04 ,SA4S 1h w"t K4.wT r 7*4 C-49 ftA,>s: wAAAjaq&k W rr, 7)4uw M oLw4 wesAAp , SEwvwo owl IMkvy CIVIC- �oA&OS TD A/duble TAZAM0, L#-949 Fkwr D --WA-1 m4U.-r, Etonra�rnic. ''()&kUpmel'r hub SOC;At CACE r-ACib77k*. WAS ,pLM ILI Aov(sot -m olr Fite, f a , 358 0.k� APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Plannin( Commission. kojVE * r TES moomenT �B✓r I)&- nji Sr !jMs A" Ta CAN . What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have am suggestions to address those issues or problems? hJ IkA#$-TAwT' IeeZ Is Ta w� of x A#r*4 14 0-1 1Xu5ro:45 lap �y AfP�cr nk 'Fj 7v0--4- . 7)(c 760 &/ 0 <AKvF�v L 'i344-ACC- G',-rweL,,A Ecroomi� t7ey�jemepuT SO C;&L I1 L--v 5�C MbWT . - What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance thl work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? ACKi iAfe #M-p 7a ftatgth I MSr i*jS Awa P 04V/6e A C�o��►ta� v� PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 359 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT r) REr"EIV-D Date JC4E ATTA HMENT 6-L r,. 19 - JU' . _ 1'; ; CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY^� L-% GU1�3TA C; T `( U 'LK' S o F F I C E APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: �tiS J a HOME ADDRESS: �('p 2 J A'vr� 1`i (DAl��il'Vl (,1 iJs bQLj J (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: i-6 TELEPHONE: (HOME) � © % 7 �- 7 f 3 (BUSINESSJ J IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: 7A'�ErJ �`r;�Q�C;jU��:dj(,i'�r �i"`'��- (''r��t�i �► ti� LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: L. j �- � If - HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? Es�b 5f, A-PP20X rL Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other �7 l background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. i uol m(, +l,-.)fzl zU lei �, �Lf-=t��(�<',/ + L�1/ ` l "J�l " d t(� `� �(.l �f� OK C�(A � C�C� �� UAI�f-�•-� � i �r.� � ��c.t�� !�-/f �- F�� jJ r� �''�, t �' �� ,, `1�� ►2� i �1/l� l� Y�.� �i �JG'C" t �� (�� 1 — ��cG� �C �-t� � `1��1c.� , �Cam, r1- �� i V " t c�l.iC IL Lc -4_x Qo r APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Plannin Commission. / /TTr 'L t( i - fir, N`rf L=IELI 17 / t��,� �%� � f�L�n� JIIt,F-7 C �� '��t��7�)a ! LU/ TiI LI�✓L/ /`✓?ter C ��>— t C,� �/ t/iit/� /w % /�z 1^ G`tl S Z� //l.�/JZ Z-1 �'.� "j Y ,9A/ �/ALlc )/i/SI.IC'/%n/% L%iqlETI/�1�t1�/ti/� L?r-1�/C.z �[�i/�//��7L'/�� ;/ Tl� L_iTLT: r� 1C . d.��O :�L� �/N/,� �1-�+-'n G✓Vl-" ',r" ,% L I A^n J T) f-' /S�jL ) What specific issues or -ems ace the La Q�imta fanning Commission ndcdo you have an suggestions to address those issues or problems? 'iHL= �1k`�i-t:.r,x-'� 1f% �t`�)JL�1/ill _/All?�,��k?�I L r1tJ ��,`',Yir_ '► N Tl�i�, ' l � "Lc:. = Lt=NL nj l j:�r1 % J%)E J �lT /A/ � 4) � 1. LL ,,t ? /Al /l4G 'r C=! / /.l%/- 4 n/ /1 i/ 1"i /.#lG '4 � ' )! 47) f-)JZ1'hJ.S %/142 -r �� i What specific attNitud�es, skil/:ls and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance th work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? Io/✓A t 4:--X J- F--z)FiVICr:-: rC /iL/ �✓LI'�i%�c' iJ,�'t An-) Jowl Ul= 1 /-irk i41z-6'4'f 1 I-1 al Gal/ i /-I 11IL- lnlG, T/iC ljcr o 10 r= "i 6f-) t') j!) i I-' J'T (- I'1) / 41 7/4e -)OMC 111Y1C 131JJC CcfJl'�AJJ1 G 't= 'i ffC>.c= 141A/4c.- 1�7 Ll k j -r� I x1 j PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: -r �� t �`Il� Lf'vf-�-i/�CI�Y�JCLfRK` P. O. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMEN73 6 ��+t% Dennis S. Wish T-E— STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 54-625 AVENIDA BERMUDAS . LA QUINTA CALIFORNIA 92253 760.564.0884 PHONE • 208.361.5447 E-FAX i DEN NIS.WISH,@VERIZON.NET PROFESSIONAL RESUME Personal Dennis S. Wish, PE — California Licensed Professional (Civil) Engineer, C041250 Structural Engineering Consultant. In private practice since 1986, specializing in Residential, Light Commercial, Seismic Retrofit, foundation problems, Tilt -up and Masonry Retrofit, Residential Wood framed retrofit and Contracted Plan Check Services, Damage assessment, Insurance claims evaluation and Expert Witness work. E-mail Primary: den nis. wish 0)verizon.net for email and for transfer of files. Please use email whenever possible. Professional 1983 to 2001 Affiliations Structural Engineers Association of California ■ Member— Hazardous Building Committee (now known as Existing Building Committee) • Involved in writing of RGA 1-91 for the City of Los Angeles and later published as the 1991 Uniform Code for Building Conservation Appendix Chapter 1 — Hazard Mitigation of Unreinforced Masonry Structures. ■ Former Chairman — Structural Methods Committee. ■ Charged with testing of foundations subsequent to the Loma Prieta Earthquake with the goal of drafting a model ordinance for the City of Los Angeles for the retrofit of residential wood frame homes with cripple wall and anchorage deficiencies. ■ Representative of SEAOSC to the California Seismic Safety Commissions Committee on residential repair and retrofit (RRR) - later published as the 1994 Uniform Code for Building Conservation Chapter 5 — Wood Frame Residential Retrofit • Former Chairman — Computer Applications Committee 1987 to 1993. ■ Provided education and training seminars for professionals who were integrating computer automation into their professional practice. ■ Past Editor in Chief of SEA International Online Professional Journal (seven years with distribution in 9 States) • Author and main contributor for monthly professional journal distributed to SEA chapters in nine states. ■ Tutorials, Software, Code implementation, CAD, creation of spreadsheets to solve structural engineering problems that were shared with the professional community ■ Co -Founder SENnt Listservice seaint@a seaintorg and Website http.Avww.seaint org ■ Internet based peer -to -peer discussion service for the purpose of obtaining peer opinions and review. ■ The Listservioe has 15,000 professional subscribers worldwide. The topics vary from proprietary materials to technical discussions related to code intent and interpretation. ■ Lecturer and Panel Participant (October 1999 SEAOC Convention in Santa Barbara, CA.) ■ Invited to represent practicing professionals as an expert in Residential Structural Design and the provisions of the 1997 Uniform Building Code Full -Compliance Chapter 16. • Publication "Wood Panel Report" available for online at: http://vvww.seaint.org/wood.htm ■ Contributor. ICBO Seismic Desian Manual Volume 11 — Light -gauge Steel Construction Problem. 3 V • Assigned to review problem prior to publication for accuracy and compliance with code provisions for the design of structures constructed with cold -form steel framing. Confidential Page 2 5/24/2002 ■ Author of software: Multi-Lat 2001 seismic design spreadsheet ■ Residential Lateral Design Spreadsheet for the design of multi -story light -tame structures with wood diaphragms. Intended to analyze structures using conventional tributary design and torsional design by rotation (rigid diaphragm analysis) in compliance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code provisions. ■ Donated as freeware to the structural engineering community (www.seaoc.oM). Author of Software: EQUAKE and ECAD — seismic design spreadsheet Provided analysis and design for the retrofit of Multi -story Unreinforced Masonry building in compliance with the City of Los Angeles RGA 1-91 and UCBC Appendix Chapter One. Donated in the year 2000 to the public domain for professional engineers 2000 to Present Building Seismic Safety Council — Corresponding Member— TS-7 Committee (Wood) • Coordination with FEMA, NEHRP and CUREe documents into final draft of 2003 International Residential Code (and engineered provisions of 2003 International Building Code) ■ Currently in final draft for submittal for approval and voting to adopt as code ■ Covers Conventional Construction Provisions for Light Framed Wood structures to be designed and constructed under prescriptive methods for use Seismic Categories A-D (lower risk areas) 1993 to Present Appeals Board Member —City of La Quints ■ Responsible for resolution of disputes over building code regulations. 1997 to Present Building Horizons Program (Boys & Girls Club of Coachella Valley) ■ Member - Board of Directors since 1999. ■ Volunteer Engineering services for Residential homes constructed by Students • Lecturer for Classroom preparation prior to starting projects ■ http://www.buildnkids.com 2000 to Present afr Part-time Adjunct Faculty — College of the Desert, Palm Desert California ■ Applied Science Department - Instructor. ■ Arch 015 — Elementary Structures — a course in Statics and Strength of Materials for those transferring to other schools such as California Polytechnic — Pomona or San Luis Obispo for the study of Architectural Engineering 1998 to Present National Association of Home Builders — REACH (Residential Engineers and Architects Council on Housing) ■ Invited as representative to National Engineering Community to participate with REACH Consortium of Architects, Engineers and Builders. The purpose of REACH is to identify the problems associated with wood construction that has resulted in extensive damage in natural disasters. The consortium is expected to promote and educate the necessity of a design team consisting of Architects, Engineers, Builders and Building Officials. The goal is to reduce the discontinuity that occurs throughout the United States and to help mitigate damage by defining construction partners responsibilities. 1996 to Present 363 Light Gauge Steel Engineers Association (LGSEA) • Involved in the development and research leading to codes for Cold -Formed Steel Construction in Confidential Page 3 5/24/2002 Residential Markets. 1999 to Present Owner, administrator and researcher. The SbvcturaftNet— httpJMww.structuralistnet • Public and Professional non-profit services for the improvement of building performance through the education of the public and by defining the responsibilities of the members of the professional community involved in and defined as the "building team". • Provides an Internet based public- service and discussions for non-professionals. Provides information and resources without solicitation to help homebuyers understand the differences in the building code that will help them make informed choices. The goal is to place responsibility upon the homebuyer to understand the choices available in high -risk regions where cost and performance may not be disclosed until after a natural disaster. • Home buyers or owners may obtain on line advice from building industry professionals to address concerns and obtain links to resources that may provide information prior to a purchase or sale. • For building industry professionals, the StructuralistNet provides topic specific professional Listservices and discussion forums where professional members of the building industry (architects, engineers, designers, builders, building officials et al) discuss issues related to the quality of construction of residential structures and design methodologies. NOTE: Between 1987 and 19931 have worked in private practice offering services specifically to the seismic design and retrofit of Unreinforced Masonry buildings throughout California. In this period, I Noted am listed as Engineer of Record on more than 360 buildings including those designed by Decorna Projects: Engineering as their Chief Engineering Consultant 1993 — Office Building 4"' and Broadway, City of Santa Monica • Owner, Ms. Belle Grishow ■ Seismic Retrofit— Unreinforced Masonry Building. Orange County Center for Contemporary Arts, Santa Ana ■ Architect: Sheer Tanaka Dennehey & Associates ■ Seismic Retrofit and Tenant Improvement of Historic Site in Santa Ana. Rembis Residence, Monte Sereno Estates, Indian Wells Country Club — Custom Home w/ Subterranean Parking ■ Approximately 6,500 square foot split-level custom home ■ Designer. David Jackson, Dual Design Horvitz Residence, La Residence, Rancho Mirage ■ Approximately 5,000 square foot Custom Home • Designer. Michael Kiner Associates ■ Builder Stoker Construction Company Stemple Residence, Waterford, Rancho Mirage • Approximately 6,500 square foot Custom Home • Architect Lewis Bishop AIA ■ Builder. RHI Construction Lieberman Residence, Waterford, Rancho Mirage ■ Approximately 9,000 square foot Custom Home ■ Architect Lewis Bishop AIA ■ Builder. RHI Construction Gudel Residence, Palm Desert ■ Approximately 8,400 square foot custom home Confidential Page 4 5/24/2002 ■ Designer. Michael Kiner Associates ■ Builder. Ken Hudson Construction Noel Residence, Mission Hills, Rancho Mirage • Approximately 6,000 square foot custom home ■ Design: Michael Kiner Associates ■ Builder. Paul Golden Construction Kessler Residence, Cypress Point, Rancho Mirage • Approximately 7,000 square foot custom home ■ Designer / Architect Kiner — Hurst Partnership ■ Builder. RHI Construction Bobrick Residence, Mirada Estates, Rancho Mirage • Approximately 8,500 square foot split level custom home ■ Designer. Michael Kiner Associates ■ Builder. Scott Thayler Construction Galen Residence Remodel, Halper Lake Drive, Tamarisk Village, Rancho Mirage ■ Total remodel of residence formerly designed by the late Steve Chase, ASID • Home constructed for Zeppo Marx in private estate section of Tamarisk ■ Designer. Michael Kiner Associates • Builder. Stoker Construction Stein Residence Remodel, Halper Lake Drive, Tamarisk Village, Rancho Mirage ■ Remodel to 4,000 square Boot residence ■ Designer. David Jackson — Dual Design ■ Builder. To be determined Bleskachek Residence, Sunny Lane, Rancho Mirage ■ Approximately 5,000 square foot custom home ■ Architect Lewis Bishop ■ Builder. Thomas Bleskachek Jacobs Residence, Cypress Point, Rancho Mirage ■ Approximately 11,000 square foot custom home ■ Designer. Michael Kiner Associates ■ Contractor. To Be Determined Lutz Residence, Tamarisk Village, Rancho Mirage ■ Approximately 7,5W square foot custom home ■ Designer. Michael liner Associates ■ Contractor. To Be Determined Gilbert Residence Remodel, The Springs, Rancho Mirage ■ Approximately 3,000 square foot custom renovation ■ Architect Anthony J. Meza AIA • Builder. Tom Lathrop, Lathrop Construction Coachella Valley Housing Coalition • Government Subsidized Homes constructed similar to Habitat for America. ■ Engineer. Dennis S. Wish PE • Builder. CVHC, Home Owner, AmeriCorp Volunteers Southgate Guam House, Rancho Mirage ■ Entry Guard House for Estates including the Bob Hope Residence i, Confidential Page 5 5/24/2002 ■ Designer / Architect Kiner / Hurst Partnership ■ Contractor. Unknown Bogan Villas Office Building, La Quints ■ Two story commercial project in old town La Quinta ■ Designer. Greg Butler • Contractor. Dan Featheringill, Dodco Construction Development of Pad L, Startwcks Coffee, La Quinta ■ 5,000 square foot commercial stores ■ Architect Marvick and Lang, Costa Mesa California • Builder. RHI Construction Biggins Residence, The Traditions, La Quints • 8,000 square foot Custom Home ■ Designer. Kiner / Hurst Partnership ■ Builder. Hudson Construction Watson Residence, Ironwood CC — Palm Desert, CA. ■ 6500 square foot Custom Home • Designer. Kiner / Hurst Partnership • Builder. Hudson Construction Monroe Residence, La Quinta Golf Estates — La Quinta, CA. • 4500 square foot Custom Home ■ Designer Ed Diaz ■ Builder. A&M Construction La Quints Country Club Repairs — La Quinta, CA • Repair by combination of mud jacking and the use of Helical Anchors to lift the building due to subsidence of the soil caused by the increase in population to the Coachella Valley that reduced the water table. • Coordinated with Earth Systems Consulting — Bermuda Dunes, Califomia and A.B. Chance Corporation — mechanical helical ground anchors. Scolaris Food Market, Santa Barbara California — Professional Collaboration ■ Virtual Office Joint Venture with Howard and VanSandes, Structural Engineers, Santa Barbara • I was contracted to provide full support services to Howard and VanSandes as needed to complete work for his client, America West Architects. This allows H&VS to satisfy his client's deadlines with known and competent help and meet the needs of Scolaris Market at the same time. Vitamin World, Children's Place, Sunglass Hut, Amman! Exchange — throughout the United States ■ Client The Tricarico Group — New Jersey ■ Professional Collaboration - We have designed the entrances (structural) for approximately 90 stores across the United States and Puerto Rico. ReCupido Residence, Banning Heights — Banning, CA ■ 6500 squar foot Custom Home. • Owner / Builder Provided Expert Witness Testimony for: • Best, Best & Krieger, John Pickney, Esq. - Indian Wells, Ca. • Matt Morris, Esq., Attomey at Law — Indian Wells, Ca. Confidential Page 6 5/24/2002 • CAD: 20 Years Cad Experience — CADAM, AutoCAD, DataCad, and Visual Cadd. Special • Analysis: Custom written Lateral Design software, Enercalc Library, Retain Pro, Stru-Calc Design Abilities Library, Wood Works Sizer and Shear, Strap, MultiFrame Finite Element, Risa 2D and Risa 3D Finite Element, RisaFoot foundation design, MathCad • Internet based consulting services: Full capabilities to coordinate projects long distance with other consultants. Most important, a full understanding of the hardware/software capabilities and uses. • Dennis S. Wish PE is known for coordination of professionals as needed to complete projects throughout California and other areas of the United States. Dennis S. Wish, PE has worked in collaboration with other professionals to provide engineering professional services for clients specializing in retail design and construction in shopping malls. We have provided AssocivAss structural engineering services for architectural firms representing national chains of retail stores designed in mall spaces throughout the United States and Puerto Rico. Our clients included Vitamin World, Children's Place, Sun Glass Hut, and Armani. Our offices work especially well with those clients who need the support but are uncomfortable with working through satellite offices. We insure our clients' progress sets and close attention to details and construction. Fee's are adjusted to compensate for insurance costs where required by the client We also specialize in concrete, steel and foundation specialties (Chance Anchors and other foundation repair procedures) and have experience as a consultant to the legal profession requiring expert witness testimony. We can provide for special needs including, but not limited to Probable Maximum Loss (PML) reports, Insured Damage investigation, Retrofit design, repair and field coordination, Roof reports for changes in finish materials, seismic damage assessment and repair design (Unreinforced Masonry, Tilt -up Concrete and Light Framed wood construction). Dennis Wish, P.E. specializes in the design Wood and Light Gauge Metal Stud construction and well large custom residential structures (single and multi -family units), commercial and industrial design and mitigation of hazards through retrofit of Unreinforced Masonry, Residential wood frame and concrete tilt -up construction. 367 Confidential Page 7 5/24/2002 I am well known for my understanding of the latest codes and technologies. Therefore, my work is Conckadon regarded for high quality structural engineering design, drawings, specifications and project specific detailing. I take great pains to insure a good balance of economy, safety and performance. I believe it is important to provide more than minimum compliance to life safety issues. It is just as important to help reduce the potential for damage and to protect the owners investment I typically require a pre -construction meeting prior to commencing work to insure quality and compliance to the provisions of the structural design. I invite the Architect, Framer and request the owner's attendance so that all issues of drawing interpretation, structural performance and safety are openly discussed and the owners concerns are addressed. Structural Observation services are provide whether or not required by code. Complete autonomy over structural design is a requirement of my services. All drawings and details are produced in my office or under my direct supervision. I respectfully decline "Calculations Only" projects. The owner and Architect can be assured that the Plan -check cycle will be expedient and rarely require more than a few notes or supportive analysis. The builder may also be confident that I will be reachable and responsive to all field needs. Thank you for this opportunity to submit my personal resume. Please feel free to contact my office to review current projects or simply to discuss your needs. I look forward to the possibility of working on your projects. Additional references shall be provided upon request. Sincerely, Dennis S. Wish PE _ Q A California Professional Engineer - C041250 p ,gOFESs tq DENNIS S. WISH C9 NO.C•341250 m LI EXP. � i w , vA CIVIL CFCALtFOt1 366 A r .. i ATTACHMENT 6-M Date dua 10 3,60A CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: K06 34K)6 HOME ADDRESS: 11-V &cko L d(yl 4(4 Wita, 1 *7,s-3 (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: ' f TELEPHONE: (HOME) fiW) -711(BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: o" l l 12f'D LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: q 171,4 1 % 5 HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? �5 Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. ' t.A, Degree. Univ. bEG9rme- 12VR #4&4404,Rdiet, I g, &Sj SS $?p- pV IM4kjI(,D 38 �& alO.te 40A) trca�ed De% g AAP feest 4 SAL- Pr tier bM & rjV13 & - to Y06 ;,I SA„ bie&6 10 yaps-1AZo1%A Gmmru�rf' ayStiC� - 10,000 T�Srae� rn ConDD. AP<rfmen�4 6i,ne-tr: ne-si-nennes PU4411 (116 04 MA% lh- VKir M 6e� det ( } m4P-Kijv'�s • - Ajj te&o �OTAPV tWg - &rnmiffiee dNRrp-- (z) �6—tld �A i�o CIJllmbig — 8©AAb r11PvyiRo-k0 369 APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Plannin C mmission. �e5��nsi�i��iLS &A, P- ugw>7p ew Femwit �eyejoPme►f FUW MfAV -w, (qqI - (�OD1niAGN L46,0.46- 15 A00 imfbPrrm- , �f it wanirV DeJel odkeor LhePf• fNiafcS (10m 1661on) JTA4TTh& Zxfftel fhAf '10WU5 BUDCir ejWARAnW, AftUU Oiy Ne6610&, P 4e[Al iS M 14n1>N6& &4n;yw Nl ftnA US AO ALA -6d icy MN M611—I d What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have an, suggestions to address those issues or problems? ,r- 6'�jA 'A'� r RAllem0 What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance thf work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? _I r ,a- C A6P of "&" >x �lj D.G�tS 0►1 �'�Ii�VPWI,Or�T PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLS TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 37() THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT a i-, -A 6-/%-0Q RECEIVED ^? JUn I :J CIT Y C l Qli;r1T A "5 OFFICE CITY OF LA QUANTA ATTACHMENT 6-NT'� Date ,"— 10 - o Z CIT Y C APPLICATION TO SERVE ON LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMMSION NAME: o<3ERT // W, L,eiM so HOME ADDRESS: 41yjv o C4'e"i.,✓0 A zu L (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: 7i/.?f3 /// /73 ,, /� (/EW?7; ', 64. TELEPHONE: (HOME) 7G0-.2v0- 2T/a (BUSINESS) _760 -568-2'SS' IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: A-loAV 1� !/ELO�MF.t/T T Tt� e-Qu i S iTi oV-r A.✓O "-r##-u�MEAfl-f LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: HAVE YOU EVER ATTENDED A MEETING OF THIS COMMISSION? y�K,'e� �, Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. S. NcE G i ✓i.�. �.✓ L.A Qu �.� ra � �•ev�i ,r3F�'.✓ .T.•✓yo�✓� i,✓ /✓e4 J CA,,✓7nl/ eL _9 wl,,E L R L' i�G�Nryirt,w �i+�.•.i tfi�.✓ /AND C/ T3/ GDlrvic L ,1,�/ /9ODITv.y T h%D�/G.r/� !�/.� T,dL /a�u.C�/,.ds Ai►'� /mot cis �A'T- �.d� Ci T7/ O� �t A.�.lc�v il?i%r.4G� �/liaQ � Gr✓.4 s i�✓ l�.ou..dS w�TN •�iM/L.OiG �©r.,c..ev�.�_.�T �oi/�f �d�l)L -'S��iC �i T�i�.r0 �i'�SliM� ��ir-�z i�✓ ��r fiNa-s t �iLai.., 'Ovi t.s.r/ Dil �Gonl �A i Giiyi�/u1.t�7y. C iydoc Alp AX1.✓Z o,✓ ?We- 71 APPLICATION, PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 Describe your knowledge of the functions, regulations, and procedures of the La Quinta Plannin Commission. . �rp -C/'n e. r coBQs .aN/I //��i/zGc.��t/i GiLow/�i iy.v0 1/P../JeLoD••tt.� iy %.✓e �'/� /d f�'Cr..) /I.✓D /(dedecJ AA4,-,jr A4,7'AV S'T.ii/ i /�/le�?�.. Ati0 irsovcL. ��it/csvcc . ✓f% G1_/Y45G�-sT.v.. � ��i6!-� �Lt /tip-Qrtd�w • /{/iile./I N.✓� J T�✓,do4' �.dc-i/ .yY�J i i �i�-, ,�. � c. �.�� o.✓ T�s� .Q.�es� What specific issues or problems face the La Quinta Planning Commission and do you have an suggestions to address those issues or problems? e-, /S �/Lv.,J/.ya Le�ir/ c.L�LS/ . �2� fi � :cT /d •✓D AWW /M,f%iLTN�� O/L GONS/ JTi?.✓T �oSi%/d-�-- �1/zo,.,lT�. FtEII//�✓1 !/i S/ ui✓ Of f`/� �//� f�1�1 %K/le. �N.� `✓Bi��ivtr /o�1e�4�c. `lam/Ti/ !�/��i2 Ori y c� S A�r✓� �-oaiOf h/i'lf/, �✓ i -H � G/T✓ !�% � c- /�£ i✓�Ds= D What specific attitudes, skills and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance th work of the La Quinta Planning Commission? L ,�/.9y� Vic'' .Al.�� c /T� To .S'T� /J/-✓��/ .�.+� i�,� iSrsrFs AND %%/� �iy/ D T ��✓S 0•= T,f/� S S�sES .e7.ri/% LGM.e 10*T 1 h!oRr- A& c [. o7w 4 S A.aI2 cot. ,fie O� _ _ S�eciF%c A/e�lX �.-, T c,A.✓ is-�.r�.�e 4�/.%F, c�.GT. Tie �:.s, ,,../s �.o f�J �_ /✓ /'/LAP fln/ 7�%6� �if/�1�/ 1 /��O/�i � �/ ✓% / G//� /t A// /w A;e"Oy" n/-e n Gsz /l./v o /C�ric.'�i✓Ti Co. /.i L 4 wgTk- i• 1 A.M /.vTEi? sTEO //� $£�.✓G �.tJdoL(i�0 /�! Trlc' 6RowT/� ;9,v40 vF L/d PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: CITY CLERK P. 0. BOX 1504 78-496 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNmFjft7 A f Robert W. Wilkinson 44300 Camino Azal La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 200-2310 OBJECTIVE To obtain a position with a progressive organization and utilize skills to maximize potential. WORK EXPERIENCE May 2001 — Present Director of Real Estate, Country Club of the Desert, La Quinta, CA • Develop and manage residential production, sales and construction • Supervise purchasing, product development and cost controls. • Involved in Land and Real Estate Development as liaison with the local Jurisdictions. October 1997-Feb. 2001 Project Manager, Republic Property Group, Dallas, TX • Successfully maintained the continuity and direction of the Lake Forest devel- opment, a residential limited access community. Lake Forest was a 5-7 year 1 10 million gross dollar project that is completing 2 years ahead of schedule. • Directed project engineering and planning. • Planned and directed all aspects of development infastructure construction. • Reviewed job bids, selected, scheduled and supervised all contractors. • Implemented the planned development and architectural guidelines. • Maintained detailed daily construction reports and weekly marketing updates for the investors and corporate management. • Successfully implemented marketing efforts, including contracting with se- lected builders and coordinating lot sales contracts. April 1993-Oct. 1997 President and Owner, R.W. Wilkinson Homes, Inc., Grand Prairie, TX • Founded a residential building company. • Secured all financing and established banking relationships. • Setup all accounts for construction materials and home warranty. • Supervised all construction, marketing and plan development • Bid out job cost and related construction expenses. • Purchased all land and lot locations. June 1989-April 1.993 Vice President, Co -Owner, Marquise Homes, Inc., Arlington, TX * Co-founder of start up company, which built 100 homes per year. • Setup all accounts for construction materials and home warranty. • Supervised all construction and marketing. • Bid out job cost and related construction expenses. • Worked with lenders securing financing. • Procured land for development. • Developed acquired land for single-family communities. 37. Sept. 1986-June 1989 Trammell Crow Homes, Project Manager, Dallas, TX • Consistently exceeded sales and profit goals. • Prospected clients through the Realtor community and corporate relocation. • Assisted in sales training. • Coordinated application for mortgage and closing of property with construc- tion, buyer, mortgage and Title Company. • Construction cost analysis, Supervised construction and sale Nov. 1985-Sept. 1986 Sales Representative, David Weekly Homes, Dallas, TX • 'Established relationships with potential clients at all levels. • Coordinated application for mortgage and closing of property with construc- tion, buyer, mortgage and Title Company. • Prospected clients through the Realtor community and corporate relocation. • Assisted in sales training. Jan. 1983 Nov. 1985 Sales Representative, Standard Pacific Homes, Irving, TX • Responsible for all aspects of presentation, follow-up and closing coordination. AI • Buyer pre -closing walk -though orientation. • Increased sales through effective demonstration of residential construction. August 1979-Jan. 1983 District Manager; Waterbed Mart, Arlington, TX • Coordinated the start-up of six retail furniture locations. • Hired and trained personnel to effectively staffed all area locations. • Promoted from Salesperson in Oregon to District Manager of the Dallas Fort Worth market to initiate national expansion. July 1977-Aug. 1979 Account Executive/Sales Manager, Motivating Advertising, Springfield, OR • Developed the marketing plans for specialty advertising items. • Arranged promotional and award items for various types of business. • Employed and trained sales personnel. EDUCATION May 1976-77 Southern Oregon State University, Ashland, Oregon Bachelor's Degree, Business Administration May 1975 Lane Community College, Eugene, Oregon Associates Degrees in Liberal Arts ACHIEVEMENTS Republic Property Group 2000 Completed developing Lake Forest three years ahead of schedule. RW Wilkinson 1993 Founded a residential construction company. Mar9yise Home 1999-93 Building 100 homes per year. Trammel Crow Co. 1988 Finalist for McSam Award. (One of three finalists.) qq �i 1 1 •�i 374 Tit(t 44Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: ,{ BUSINESS SESSION: v COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: Consideration of Waste Management of the Desert PUBLIC HEARING: Requested CPI Based Rate Increase Pursuant to Section 15.1 of the Amended Restated Agreement for the Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Municipal Solid Waste RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The refuse collection fees will be increased $.10 a month per billing. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The City has received correspondence from Waste Management of the Desert requesting a CPI based charge increase for Fiscal Year 2002/2003 (Attachment 1). The CPI from January 2001 /02 was 2.70%. Based upon this, the City Council may grant an increase equal to 50% or 1.35% of the CPI for the service portion of the rate. The City and Waste Management of California Inc. have signed an Amended and Restated Agreement for the Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Municipal Solid Waste for the period of June 30, 2000 through July 30, 2008. Article 15, Section 15.1-CPI Based Charges of the Agreement permits the contractor (Waste Management) to seek, in writing, a rate increase to reflect ordinary charges for doing business based upon the Consumer Index. A statement from an independent accountant (Attachment 2) must be attached to the request indicating that the contractors cost for providing service has increased at a rate equal to the increase in the CPI. 375 G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\ccjh-waste.wpd In addition, Section 15.7-Maximum Rate, states the rate charged may not exceed 103% of the lowest rate charged to other Coachella Valley cities which are provided like services by Waste Management. Based upon the CPI being 2.7%, the City Council may grant an increase of 50% of the CPI, or 1 .35%. The service portion of the contract in $7.14 for the residential tax billing accounts. The contractor rate increase reflected a $.14 increase, however this was based upon the total rate and not the service rate portion as required by the contract. The rate increase should be equal $.10 per month. The current rate is $10.09 a month for each residential tax billing account. The increase of $.10 would raise this rate to $10.19. The lowest rate provided by Waste Management is to the City of Cathedral City at a rate of $10.08. A 103% of this rate is $10.38; therefore, the proposed increase to the City rate of $10.19 per month is within the 103% requirement and complies with Section 15.7 (Attachment 3). With the increase, the residential tax billing rate will be as follows: RESIDENTIAL SERVICE TYPE Component Total Service Disposal AB939 Individual Residence - Curb Service $7.14 $2.34 $0.61 $10.09 Tax Roll Billing 2002 Rate Increase- 1.35% $0.1 0 0.10 2002 Adjusted Rate $7.24 $2.34 $0.61 $10.19 Should the Council grant the rate increase, staff would schedule the appropriate public hearing so the rates could be included on the tax rolls. In addition, this rate increase would be reflected on all the residential service components for the residential schedules that are not on the tax rolls. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Grant the $.10 per month rate increase to the service component of the fee schedule; or 2. Do not grant the $.10 per month rate increase to the service component of the fee schedule; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. 376 !7� G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\ccjh-waste.wpol3 �� Respectfully submitted, ctor Attachments: Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 1. Waste Management letter of March 27, 2002 - 2002 Rate Increase 2. Independent accounting request 3. Waste Management letter of April 22, 2002 - 103% information 377 J 1- 3 G:\WPDOCS\CC SO Rpts\ccjh-waste.wpd ATTACHMENT #1 WASTE MANAGEMENT 41-575 Eclectic Street Palm Desert, CA 92260 (760) 340-5901 (760) 340-2732 Fax www.wmdesert.com March 27, 2002 Mr. Jerry Herman Community Development Director City of La Quinta 78 495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mr. Herman: RE: 2002 Rate Increase In accordance with article 15, section 1 of the municipal solid waste and recycling agreement, Waste Management of the Desert respectfully requests a rate increase. The change in the CPI for January 2001 through January 2002 was 2.70 %. Applied to the service portion of our rate is half of the CPI increase of 1.35 %. Attached is the back up information for your review. Please advise us of the scheduled council meeting the city will consider our request. Waste Management of the Desert thanks you for your consideration and review of the rate increase. Si cerely, Jo Wilhelm D' trio Controller cc: Frank Orlett Deborah McGarrey 378 9 E0 ° w V a; a V) Lnc" u O 4 11.1 N N O W - M a•M 1r RI y; C V1 W O O ai U O •'�d N I I I I O r♦ O O O H rC N In N Ln Id r A •� C 0 0 o r4 l CIl rl l rj l O Z y 1. O U.IO HN N En ��of ri i. C H N rn ui r•1 N r 1 1 I I: a; O o 1 N N N w z Id W N t0 A N •14 W 0 A7+ O In l I I l �. U Oy N W CL W 13 H �+ v M j m j M j M j a (rl .-I fV M 13 W h'A y ,� U W 0 AN rl r� N N N W N A N W 0 0 CA►' N W p � !A N NOl lno d'd'r ra' A mOln tO In d'N H11 AW OA O M 11'1 .-1 t0 r In r r �••I O rmr m rl 1G•��+0 ,7N, F� O N �O 0;O1 �-i m 4O '-1 mOr Ors-1mm W H C a1 Z fjN ay re•I r ri In ri Y1 rl N rl N r-1 N .� er .i In �1 u� .i In H z �Q. W tn�Tj �Wy,�7 010rLn OD a'O1a'N W rnNto.-I�rclna .ml N O 8 N •> p W W O N In C1 r♦t0 IV' 10 t0 rl 00 r4 Go rq W O ~ V'Mm0110mrN '� LL H F A N .r-1 Ln rl Ln -1 N N .-1 N .-1 �7' .r-I -0In er-1 Ln Cq N P; H O Gm D W (��G � rtOMeNr Nmd'In � k10 NNOIMIOM01 Hz N N U O rlrM 01 M r- 01 rGOO N O N I01M O%D j O V _ N r - riMriv wt-1 v� GS of W N O __ __________ , ^" 6) it .0 O O N r. ___ ___ t3l _ ____ ____ _ ___ N O a} In M O � d U 7 G: 'GM 4)O O G4 W.0 4'i p H 1 0 1 O 1 O !k+ O m N 44 r+ '••1 Cn N 0 0 t. •rl �+i O tiN O W O .T. O 1 I� I 1 0 .0 U y OO e4 /W� [�� A[- 0-4 H Gu FG%". ]Id HN O ra ri 41 0a. U UC 'q rzON 1 W Z ra � mj d co O p i. py Wvj • �+ Ey N vlz rl r M a Of ' rl N N N rj U 1 O H W f:t Sda p� W y w0 +�•+ U O jU 4d q N Q O U r M m 1 I I 1 0 10 0 C7 d N ��a �7 W N 'C i4 O N O N ri N Ir) o 0 P O� A to W >I R ,-j t0 r•1 In In In 1 1 1 1 PG Q N W to C; ~i' W r.l W Zp W O d N N N N N a m .r1 p a) w; Ot F`I �-i � N U A N rl 'i $4 o C� d y W O �� N NO r•1 t0 O110 d'm V'r01 GuO OMrrl tO ul d't0 t0 tom NMr NO �N d Hi ri II'/ O hN r O m m N V' V' O ra rMrN m0lm 0r p N N In rl lmD 3j 4C ro ~ a r♦ Lnr-f In ri N r•1 M HN �„j��ri U O C N O OD m r N ri M t0 t0 m M t0 W p ,L7 U U CV oo � ra 0 'i o t0 01 r M r* M M M, rl E' Coll w m O d' C m O r•I O O N II 0 a1.0 cn h w AN t-NrNmOlin0%H rl N Inrlr mmMOf V r4-W r4 vri to r•110 \ r0 C O 1� r4 m r•1 In ri N ri N r•1 jiId r0a u U H° V 0 ri r111.1 N r MN rl rm Fina 011nr In In tnmN Nfd 0 rr-I 14 . CE-4 In V''d'aco OM01 $L RiO N.T.N ri to t0 t0 Of In lnm O 0 j']N rilnrlNr!NrlNrl rid e-Iv-1Lnritto W e a da Cl p C g aJ CyC w C U : : : N 4) Id .00 ro H O d N t1l O . . . . . . . . . . . "J N C O O aSi O o c u CD h j� z • O O rq � t0 O O O O OUl � ,q r pn 1� II 11 EA a, Ch r 4 r-1 r♦ r� II II II O ,n N p 0 �r •rA % ',� A Or+ II u d� d �Oao :cam1 :H rA U 0 o ri CT O a `" 'd " ON " ro ,p II O) II i1r GIr Nv p b 0i k0i N :: U W A O U rm1 bj HA 1 0 1 0 q N [: 91 N o. A w O o N a In " Od v a •� w w m Enx u o I N N w p x a 3 m ro 0 y •CC a) E-y o A ATTACHMENT #2 1N4 �� ZAP � nr to o > Comm\) WASTE MANAGEMENT OF THE DESERT ' PALM DESERT. CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT ' AND SCHEDULE OF NET OPERATING REVENUE LESS COSTS OF DOING BUSINESS DECEMBER 31, 2001 AND 2000 ol P p P � F k .. d.. (. X 1 1 � i AFL ' PR0"I%,itiAI\„ 390 DO NOT DISCLOSE �� 7 LPG ' LUND & GUTTRY LLP /CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 39700 BOB HOPE DRIVE • SUITE 309 • P.O. BOX 250 • RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270-0250 Telephone (760) 568-2242 • Fax (760) 346-8891 E-Mail: cpas@lundandguttry.com • www.lundandguttry.com 1 INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT Mr. Frank Orlett ' Waste Management of the Desert Palm Desert, California ' We have reviewed the accompanying Schedule of Net Operating Revenue Less Costs of Doing Business for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. The Company's management is responsible for this ' schedule. Our review was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of ' Certified Public Accountants. A review is substantially less in scope than an examination, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion on the Schedule of Net Operating Revenue Less Costs of Doing Business. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. ' Based on our review, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the Schedule of Net Operating Revenue Less Costs of Doing Business for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 is not ' presented, in all material respects, in conformity with the basis of presentation as described in Note 1. This report is intended solely for the information and use of management of Waste Management of the Desert and the various municipalities currently conducting business with Waste Management of the Desert and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. April 22, 2002 44a V_ --A CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY DO NOT DISCLOSE 381 -1- J (13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF THE DESERT SCHEDULE OF NET OPERATING REVENUE LESS COSTS OF DOING BUSINESS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 AND 2000 GROSS OPERATING REVENUE (Less) costs of disposal and franchise fees NET OPERATING REVENUE COST OF OPERATING EXPENSES Labor Truck operating expense Container operating expenses Other operating expenses SALES, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE (LESS) NONCASH DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION EXPENSE FOR THE YEAR ADD PURCHASED CAPITAL ADDITIONS FOR THE YEAR COSTS OF DOING BUSINESS NET OPERATING REVENUE LESS COSTS OF DOING BUSINESS BEFORE INCOME TAXES 2001 $37,151,157 (13,232,586) 23,918,571 5,935,204 6,787,856 1,426,561 1,131,067 15,280,688 3,773,400 19,054,088 (2,597,460) 824,372 17,281,000 2000 $35,528,344 (12,297,718) 23,230,626 5,492,739 6,405,431 1,194,223 940,978 14,033,371 3,615,875 17,649,246 (2,587,156) 897,267 15,959,357 $ 6,637,571 $ 7,271,269 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY DO NOT DISCLOSE (The accompanying notes are an integral part of this schedule) -2- % CHANGE 2.96 % 8.28% 8.72 % 3R" 'f (' 3 IWASTE MANAGEMENT OF THE DESERT NOTES TO SCHEDULE OF NET OPERATING REVENUE LESS COSTS OF DOING BUSINESS ' NOTE 1- PURPOSE AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accompanying Schedule of Net Operating Revenue Less Costs of Doing Business has been prepared by the Company for the purpose of analyzing the net impact (% change) of the increases (decreases) of ' operating revenues, operating expenses, sales, general and administrative expense (before income taxes) and purchased capital additions during the year. ' The Company has defined net operating revenue as total gross operating revenues less the related costs of disposal paid to the County of Riverside and other landfill sites and franchise fees paid to the municipalities on the accrual basis of accounting. ' The Company has defined cost of doing business as total operating (excluding exclu expenses noncash P depreciation expense); sales, general and administrative expenses and all purchased capital additions (i.e., property and equipment) on the accrual basis of accounting. The Company has excluded noncash depreciation expense and included current year capital additions to better reflect the cost of operating the business during the year. ' NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF RESULTS ' The summary of the key results of the accompanying schedule for financial categories as defined in Note 1 is as follows: ' Increase in net operating revenue 2.96 % Increase in costs of doing business 8.28% 1 Decrease in net operating revenue less costs of doing business (8.72)0 ' The California Consumer Price Index for the year ended January 2002 for Los Angeles, Riverside and Orange Counties was a 2.7% increase. The proposed price increase to the City of LaQuinta of 1.35% is substantially less than the Company's 8.72% decrease in net operating revenue less costs of doing business for the year ended December 31, ' 2001. CONFIDENTIAL ' AND PROPRIETARY DO NOT DISCLOSE 381 03 ' 3- ATTACHMENT AE3' WWMJUNTA vd�Gt�tih�� o Q �v UNIT'� O�J April 22, 2002 Mr. Jerry Herman, Community Development Director City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, California 92260 WASTE MANAGEMENT 41-575 Eclectic Street Palm Desert, CA 92260 (760) 340-5901 (760) 340-2732 Fax www.wmdesert.com Re. 4/10/2.T_.etter, addressing the issue of Waste Management's 2002 Rate Increase Dear Mr. Herman: The second paragraph of your April 1 Oth letter requested information pursuant to Section 15.7 of our contract. Generally, that section states that Waste Management must provide proof that the rate increase requested for the City of La Quinta does not exceed 103% of "... the lowest rate for residential refuse collection services provided to incorporated municipalities in the Coachella Valley (the "Rate'). The rate shall consider "like" services provided to other incorporated municipalities; "like services" shall be defined as MSW collection, curbside recycling, curbside bulky items and automated green waste collection. " There are three other municipalities that Waste Management services in the Coachella Valley which have similar collection services (i.e., automated waste, recycling, and green waste in 96 gallon containers). Those municipalities with their rates are: Cathedral City $10.08 Indio 10.25 Palm Desert 10.25 La Quinta's rate charged to its residential customers for similar services is $10.09. The proposed 1.35% increase (half of the CPI rate for 2001) will increase the rate to $10.23. This amount is 101.39% of the lowest rate (Cathedral City) before considering a 2002 rate adjustment to that city (Note: No municipalities will receive a rate decrease). We believe we comply with Section 15.7 of the contract. This new rate will only raise La Quinta to 101.39% of the lowest rate. Please call either Frank Orlett or me if you have further questions. Sincerely A. Wil , CPA Di trict Controller IQ A. LJ COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 Consideration of the July 4, 2002, Holiday Schedule RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: The cost for the additional holiday is approximately $16,600 in salaries and $5,000 in benefits for a total of $21,600. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the June 4, 2002, City Council meeting, the Council discussed modifying the July 4th holiday schedule by including July 5, 2002. The City Council had questions concerning this proposed action. The addition of July 5, 2002, as part of the 2002 holiday schedule is a change in benefits and therefore a meet and confer issue. Accordingly, the City's legal counsel advised the City to request comments from the La Quinta City Employees Association (LQCEA) regarding the matter (Attachment 1). A memorandum was received from the LQCEA supporting the proposed modification of the holiday schedule (Attachment 2) Over the past six years, the City Council has granted additional holidays by minute action three times (Attachment 3). The City Council most recently modified the 2001 holiday schedule by adding December 24 and December 31, 2001 as paid holidays (Attachment 4). 'W FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve a modification to the 2002 holiday schedule to include July 5, 2002, as a paid holiday; or 2. Do not approve a modification to the 2002 holiday schedule to include July 5 2002, as a paid holiday; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Notice to LQCEA. 2. LQCEA Memorandum 2. Prior minute actions. 3. Prior announcement of additional holidays. 08/1 1 /99 SACITYMGR\CCSHELL. WPD 386 D02 ATTACHMENT 1 5&4 4 .epQrunfw MEMORANDUM TO: Anthony Moreno, LQCEA Vice President FROM: Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Mt� DATE: June 6, 2002 SUBJECT: July 41h Holiday Schedule The City Council is scheduled to discuss the July 4th holiday schedule at its regular meeting of June 18, 2002. The Council may consider the possibility, cost and implications of declaring Friday, July 5, 2002 as an additional paid holiday. City staff will be preparing a staff report for this meeting. The staff deadline for the report is June 11, 2002. We wanted to take this opportunity to advise the LQCEA of the meeting and give you an opportunity to note any concerns, questions or comments on this matter prior to finalizing the report on June 11, 2002. You may forward any questions or comments that you have to John Ruiz, Personnel/Risk Manager. In consideration of our report deadline, we would appreciate receiving any questions or comments you might have by noon, Tuesday, June 11, 2002. Thank you. c: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager John Ruiz, Personnel/Risk Manager 387 g: V sdoc/mw/74021gcea ATTACHMENT 2 La Quinta City Employees Association TO: John Ruiz, Personnel/Risk Manager FROM: Anthony Moreno, LQCEA Vice President W. -7yt- DATE: June 10, 2002 SUBJECT: July 4`h Holiday Schedule The La Quinta City Employees' Association has been advised that the City Council is considering the possibility, cost and implications of declaring Friday, July 5, 2002 as an additional paid holiday. The La Quinta City Employees' Association has reviewed your consideration at our regular Association Meeting of June 10, 2002 and it has received unanimous support. We are pleased that the City Council is considering declaring Friday, July 5, 2002 as an additional paid holiday. We would be appreciative if the consideration is approved, but nevertheless are prepared to perform our duties and gladly serve our community if City Hall is open on July 5, 2002. Thank you for your consideration and an opportunity to comment. 388 60 ATTACHMENT 3 City Council Minutes 28 November 6, 2001 3-B. SCHEDULING FOR MEETING OF JANUARY 1, 2002. City Clerk Greek advised the first regularly -scheduled City Council meeting in January 2002 falls on New Years Day and asked Council's preference on rescheduling the meeting. Council concurred to reschedule the January 1, 2002, meeting to Thursday, January 3, 2002. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS 1. DISCUSSION REGARDING COUNCIL DECORUM. Council Member Perkins commented on the recent joint meeting with the various City commissions, which he felt was dominated by a few Council Members. He stated three of the Commissioners also spoke to him about not getting an opportunity to speak. He requested the Council extend more courtesy to each other and not interrupt when another Council Member is speaking. Mayor Pena expressed appreciation for Council Member Perkins' comments and stated he will try to minimize such actions in the future. 2. DISCUSSION REGARDING COUNCIL MEMBERS' CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. Council Member Adolph requested this item be continued to the next Council meeting. 3. DISCUSSION REGARDING MONDAYS PRIOR TO SCHEDULED HOLIDAYS OF DECEMBER 25, 2001, AND JANUARY 1, 2002. Council Member Sniff suggested City Hall be closed December 241`' and 31 st due to Christmas and New Years Day falling on a Tuesday. After a brief discussion, Council concurred. 389 0 0 r; 4, i , - 4 City Council Minutes 22 December 2, 1997 C. PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION APPOINTMENT. Council concurred on directing staff to agendize a discussion of boards/commissions for the second meeting in January and to not accept any further applications. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS 1. DISCUSSION OF DECLARING DECEMBER 26, 1997 A CITY HOLIDAY FOR CITY EMPLOYEES. Council Member Sniff felt it would be a positive gesture toward staff to declare December 26th and January 2nd (both Fridays) as City holidays. He felt having a work day between a holiday and the weekend would not be productive. A brief discussion ensued, resulting in Council indicating its desire to give City employees December 26th and January 2nd as holidays - to be implemented administratively or agendized for the next Council meeting for formal action. 2. DISCUSSION OF LOCATION OF UTILITY BOXES AT INTERSECTIONS. Council Member Adolph noted the presence of four large utility boxes at the Jefferson Street/Highway 111 intersection where the City's monument sign is proposed to be installed. He suggested the possibility of relocating the boxes so as not to interfere with the statement that Council is wishing to make with the new monument sign and felt a policy should be considered to keep such boxes away from the corners in the future. Mr. Genovese, City Manager, advised that staff is looking into the options available regarding these boxes. 3. DISCUSSION OF COUNCIL DECORUM. Council: Member Perkins noted that under the protocol laid out in the Council's Rules of Procedure, once a Council Member has spoken on an issue, he/she are _. not supposed to discuss the issue any further until the other Council Members have had an opportunity to speak to the issue. He further noted that the Mayor usually speaks last and asked that such procedures be followed in the future to give everyone equal opportunity. 190 City Council Minutes 23 July 2, 1996 MOTION - It was moved by Council Member Sniff/Mayor Holt to continue to collect the current landfill tip fee rates to capture and utilize the $8.50 per ton reduction to fund programs reduced or eliminated by the Riverside County Waste Management Resources District (WMRD) and to continue the public hearing to the next Council meeting on the refuse collection, solid waste programs, and the AB939 compliance charges to be placed on the Tax Rolls. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 96-111. 1. CONSIDERATION OF RESCHEDULING THE JULY 16TH COUNCIL MEETING. Mayor Holt advised that she would be leaving on July 16th to attend the League of California Cities Conference and asked if the Council would consider rescheduling the July 16th Council meeting. MOTION- It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to hold the next Council meeting on July 22, 1996 at 3:00 p.m. instead of July 16, 1996. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 96-112. 2. CONSIDERATION TO DECLARE JULY 5TH A CITY HOLIDAY. Council Member Sniff suggested that July 5th be declared a City holiday. Mr. Genovese, City Manager, advised that he would need the Council's authorization to declare it a holiday and give the employees the day off provided the Employees Association concur and waive any further actions in regards to the meet and confer process. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins to authorize the City Manager to declare July 5th a City Holiday, giving City Employees the day off should the Employees Association concur and waive any further actions in regards to the meet and confer process. In response to Mayor Holt, Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, advised that she didn't see any problem with doing it as long as labor counsel is consulted to make sure that it's handled appropriately. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO, 96-113. 391. - ,r. 00F T-i4 4 XP Q" MEMORANDUM TO: All City Employees FROM: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager DATE: November 28, 2001 SUBJECT: Holiday Schedule ATTACHMENT 4 The City Council has graciously designated December 24 and December 31, 2001 as holidays. We wish you and your family the best this holiday session. c: City Council 390, T4ht 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: 1J COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: Consideration of Acceptance of a PUBLIC HEARING: Donation of Art Pieces from Santa Fe Corporation RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Although the art piece(s) would be donated to the City, the expense of moving the piece(s) from the present location as well as installation at a new location and refurbishment of the piece(s) could be funded by the Art in Public Places account. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The new owners (Pacific Santa Fe Corporation) of the former sculpture garden on Madison Avenue have approached the City regarding the possibility of donating up to four pieces of art to the City of La Quinta, as provided in Attachment 1. Attachments 2, 3, 4 and 5 are digital photographs of the artwork that is being presented for City Council consideration. Should the City Council so desire to accept the donation of one or more art pieces, the cost of removal from the existing location to a current location or to an area for storage while a new location is found, as well as the cost to refurbish the art piece(s) could be funded by the Art in Public Places account. Funds would need to be allocated at this time to allow for the removal of the art pieces at the current location by the June 30, 2002, date referenced in Attachment 1. An amount not to exceed $10,000 from the Art in Public Places account could be allocated for this project at this time. Due to the short notice for this project, a formal estimate could not be obtained for this report. The art piece(s) could be stored in the City yard until appropriate locations can be found for the piece(s). 393 Due to the article in the Desert Sun on Tuesday, June 4, staff has received calls from the Palm Springs Desert Museum, the La Quinta Arts Foundation and Thane International regarding the art pieces. These organizations have expressed a desire to acquire the art pieces should the City Council decide to not accept the donation. If the City Council would like to accept a donation of art work from the Pacific Santa Fe Corporation, resolutions adopting such donations will be provided for City Council consideration at the July 2, 2002, City Council meeting. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Accept the donation of one or more art pieces from the Santa Fe Corporation and allocate up to $10,000 from the Art in Public Places account for the relocation of the art pieces from the current location to the City yard for storage; or 2. Accept the donation of one or more art pieces from the Santa Fe Corporation and allocate funds from a different account for the relocation of the art pieces from the current location to the City yard for storage; or 3. Do not accept the donation of one or more art pieces from the Sante Fe Corporation; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully bmitted, 1 . T Dodie Horvitz"C�mmunity Services Director Approved for submission by: J Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Correspondence from Santa Fe Corporation 2. Photograph of Art Piece Number One 3. Photograph of Art Piece Number Two 394 4. Photograph of Art Piece Number Three 5. Photograph of Art Piece Number Four} S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.202.Santa Fe Art Donation.wpd 06/13/02 THU 13:18 FAX 5036701604 PAC LAND ➢IGNT a 001 PACIFIC SANTA FE IM June 13, 2002 ATTACHMENT 1 T E L E C 0 P Y TELEPHONE: (503) 670-5411 FAX: (503) 670-9400 E-MAIL; markMpacificsantafexom To: Dodie Horvitz — City of La Quinta, California From: Mark Rockwell Ref: Puerta Azul (Art Park Property) Ms Horvitz: It is my understanding that the artist who created the Rainbow sculpture, has donated that to the City of La Quinta. In addition to the Rainbow sculpture, there are several additional pieces remaining on the Art Park property which we as owners of the site would gladly donate to the City if the City is willing to accept art work as well as accept the responsibility and expense of removing and relocating the pieces selected. We would need to receive a written acceptance from the City no later than June 20, 2002, and the art would need to be removed on or before June 30, 2002. Prior to us closing on the property, the attorney for the seller, Scott McClanahan of Palm Desert sent a letter to each artist advising them that they would need to reclaim their individual pieces of art prior to a specific date, If not, they would waive any rights to their property. If you want to verify this, or consult with Mr. McClanahan, he can be reached at: 74-075 El Paseo, Suite C-4 , Palm Desert, Ca 92260 ; business (760)-779-5300 ; fax (760)773-0919 1 will be out of the office starting tomorrow, June 14t' through Friday, June 21". If you have any questions, or need additional information in this regard, please call Deborah Masterson at 503 670-5437 395 VU$ it V 0. 4r t_ti i.d d r rxt ih,'".1 t J�Pdrxa s r.° a - , Yfl "�. ' IN,77N,J a M1�A#r,. t"syr �r G•t"�7�"�a � :x`e` �# 3Jr w 4$r err C r r <>J k , � r y <7?a r, • c,; � 4 ,� , • ', y`�"k'�" '-"r t,* y . �4'" i1+4 � �"� ,r "° �!i'1 � r t'•r ! X .�` ; t., J ' 'r• +'.' y �i %t,5 � rr•*T F � ,� ��` � � rti'�+�+� a � ;�'"`-a � � t� �r ��ah�. yr � ` i• ` .a' a. , .... _ i . , .. rr.�`:,� .. __ "':k. .�t!!: � �^YW'74tr1+ �uF�s �wr.:�"wr��-'"•-.+��'sz�.i.n�'.. -� i ...�i I Niw „..: �. f � rrK Ak `Iw^,.i :S�r. Z •1 F :�+i IP •� e ��"{-ram ,R t ";hr y .3 �.=Y..71 ;ram".... �'t�^v_ se4�' � r�'. r � "*�i "' ` ; ,a, ti � �-`•`Y �. \" -: ,.` Kt lT,�"�'Y} �'+a' \ys-J$.�.w t.•K, ^" 2'^r t: i y ,y r is +, ...-, Y '"s , Y '•'� f.a �. � f e S •�� >{ ,' � k� '•t Ti ^Sy ",�' a. - f �y a.- `' C-'. a:aa ` 7 1y°6V ! ;w1 � � � k1 i:! A �r!,1 , � 7 F-• ,,,,. '�, y.("'i r i 1y.,$ i +. �, i �{'W+-A y,f s„' ..�, ia�,,, f-- • � 1� 'r , i �f*, 7�r' ••l sa; �,A % -' �-%..,F ?'X �,Tas+.i "Y � Wit: nr. �•.!%�•a x.��t..��tb'�.C.�f.�s_.r.''� v`�.-'�,.a. .7-a...tia ..._-' 4- .. ,�. w" �� f y A r ' �• � a k a � �, d� a� � � ,-.. + ! i a � `,k:. , , � Jrii + a 7 �a � I¢ �'�t•IFi� h,E�S .r �, �: ;_ .. • r , ,%,f+�-pq ,�sw'k'• '•" � :aw r , , ;- f -"rat'_ y�rr �a 1��!r�,, x,�w..+ � �,�cc a„ ivy oon ,- 1 4 "•g32ARf 'K " ~lrh,�,�C. s�+'Lf y Ig +," •' 'Xi" t r` w., i ,'� d! "� � t.., ro �x P. y C �_ r,. �: .a.. + �.+ kb 4u :'.'ia ,•r�r�•� w,�t 'ivbt�l ''r" a �r ram• +� 5 i a s r v �' 4 " fit, w -. �3'7 f n+- ', fx° r za w " s• ',. ' •.. a r `� r �'a~�Ni k#. ,•,,, °a ��:i e s + 4 .r i r a.V kN . cV r i' t , ' S w: �"�'� •%r ' �. �rK"' «;2�gi" y [F s r .. + .: � i°1 t� rs. :� r ...•S:i r i r r -: vR'r. >6rJ �1ar(±°9� �,, �'„k • � 5{r inr ?:t; . �•.3 s 8: ,-; r e� BSc C 1 � �• . Y 1�e 5 4 P.iz!! •mvSYlffi„�.'.�� "�5.r .. 3�M�'r'. �.. ..4. V. t�• 4,, � ;' C.., r�, p.'i r. ��'jY;Y�6ae'�n. _..�. �� Alf tbFiAv j.Y .hi _A' :.1Z FY �AxY'?uc. a1. T........s.+.x-!r }�i�J �.-.�„-Ya. _. ! -.. e. t. 1 AA ijlot f w Wp 1 §� w� too S ' � �" � . � G"�'4-s.,�"'� � � pf 4e�^,� d�• t-`{ 1 ��! �� w � �.- "' 't�'� "'� s6 4 ��` i' " on � � 6 � 'F'• t h -� � Mon �wt ti M1 1 ,• P ems,,,. n E';-?^ ��` sit �_ �.� � � , v � .�. j � i► a r t � �r - ttom�, .l ,' i - k„„y, � • a �V � .Pr•, �`. - �,4,,..n�a. ry k w y 'v,"? I � '� - ::7 �� y'4�• �" � k"' , : � 4 rsd 9' r yfb�'s�` i.u,� -.. ' w"�,^• .l � '� va„ � Y ) ML l".u.aaM � •.Y..M r • .r 'sr'i:•, �� _ €�€ - __ .. Y•.a.A�S'F; ��-�'. ;lr. fides^, .f ..,;.;:.1.* T4ht 4 4 Qu&& COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 Discussion of City's Adopted Fiscal Year 2002-03 Marketing Plan RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: None at this time. The City's adopted Fiscal Year 2002-03 Marketing Plan includes a financial component totaling $347,750, which represents the total cost of implementing all the marketing programs included within the Plan. A breakdown of the total marketing budget is proposed as follows (in relation to the City's 2002-03 budget): Economic Development $173,950 Redevelopment $ 50,000 Community Services $ 48,800 Capital Improvement Program $ 75,000 TOTAL $347,750 The total includes carry-over funds for activities that were budgeted this year, but were unable to be completed in part or whole. Specifically, those activities include the grand opening of the Civic Center Campus ($13,000) and the City's banner program ($6,000). CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: The City Charter allows the City "to utilize revenues from the general fund to encourage, support and promote economic development." The City's Marketing Plan is a key tool in promoting and supporting economic development in the City BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the April 2, 2002 City Council meeting, the City Council discussed marketing strategies as presented by Kiner Goodsell for fiscal year 2002-03. Pursuant to 401 Council direction during that meeting, Kiner Goodsell developed the City's Fiscal Year 2002-03 Marketing Plan (Attachment 1) and presented it for Council consideration on May 7, 2002, at which time the Plan was adopted. Simultaneously, staff had been working on the Request for Proposals (RFP) process for marketing services for fiscal year 2002-03. During the May 7, 2002 meeting, the Council was informed of staff's progress to date, and advised that the selected firm would implement the 2002-03 Marketing Plan. Upon completion of the RFP process, the Marketing Review Committee brought forward its recommendation to the Council during the June 4, 2002 City Council meeting. The Council opted not to select a marketing firm at that time and, after some discussion, directed staff to bring back the City's adopted Fiscal Year 2002- 03 Marketing Plan for further Council consideration. The Council discussed the possibility of taking a new approach to the marketing program, especially in light of new City activities and citizen concerns. The adopted Plan is attached to facilitate discussion and direction by the Council. As currently written, it specifies target markets and marketing goals, and sets forth economic development marketing programs such as advertising in television and print media, creating fresh collateral materials, planning new activities for the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) conference, and supporting local businesses via a business retention program (similar to the "Passport to Savings" idea). The Plan also includes community services programs such as advertising for grand openings, implementing the City's banner program, and supporting local community events like the Mariachi Festival. The Council may also wish to discuss means for implementing whichever marketing program is selected (i.e., discuss the process for selecting any appropriate marketing consultants). Respectfully submitted, �'N^-CJL, Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. City's Adopted Fiscal Year 2002-03 Marketing Plan 402 002 ATTACHMENT 1 City of La Quinta 2002-2003 Marketing Plan Approved by the City Council: May 7, 2002 - 4�3 004 /49:ii 0nerodse ll City of La Quinta 2002-2003 Marketing Plan Prepared by: Kiner/Goodsell Advertising With the direction of the City Council and City Staff, Kiner/Goodsell Advertising has prepared a marketing plan for implementation by the City of La Quinta during the 2002-2003 fiscal year. In addition to evaluating past marketing programs and researching new marketing programs, Kiner/Goodsell has structured next year's marketing plan to continue communicating with the City's target markets and striving to reach the City's marketing goals and objectives, which are as follow: Target Markets • Local and national site locators and CEOs of prospective companies looking to expand or relocate their business • Site locators and businesses already interested in La Quinta as a new location for their business • Current La Quinta businesses • La Quinta residents; full and part-time • La Quinta visitors • Coachella Valley residents Goals/Objectives • Continue to attract new businesses to La Quints in order to diversify the economy and tax base, for the purposes of offering new services for residents and visitors. • Communicate the significance and benefits of economic development growth to City residents in order to garner more favorable support for economic development within the community. • Help current City businesses grow in order to keep La Quinta businesses satisfied and profitable. • Educate residents of the community about valuable community services programs, and ensure the community is well-informed about those City programs. In focusing on those target markets and marketing goals and objectives, Kiner/Goodsell recommends implementing the following marketing plan, which includes the feedback and direction of the City Council: Economic Development Advertise"in new publications — Kiner/Goodsell has identified new publications for reaching site locators and businesses looking to relocate, including: • Business Facilities • Shopping Centers Today 404 .. • Shopping Center World Update infomercial — As a proven effective tool for the City, the infomercial has several uses, including: • Broadcast in viable markets for economic development • Distribute to interested site locators and businesses • Broadcast in local market for community recognition Advertise in local publications — Continue to advertise in print vehicles such as the Palm Springs Life Desert Cities Progress Issue and the Bob Hope Chrysler Classic Program Guide — in order to maintain a presence in meaningful local publications. Implement public relations program to achieve national publicity and recognition — In the past, Kiner/Goodsell has handled local public relations efforts for the City. This year, it is recommended that public relations efforts work to gain exposure outside the Coachella Valley — specifically in trade publications read by site locators and CEOs looking to expand their business, such as Business Facilities, Franchise Times, Shopping Centers Today, Shopping Center World, etc. This additional PR in other markets will boost the awareness of La Quinta and help the City with its economic development messages. Update all collateral materials — Create fresh, new economic development collateral materials for distribution over the next three years — including a presentation folder, brochures and new photography depicting new "beauty shots" of the City. Data and revised statistics from the new Sedway Report, due in late 2002, would also be included. Increase presence at ICSC — The City could benefit by investing in a tactic that would assist in driving traffic to its booth at the Palm Springs convention of the International Council of Shopping Centers. For example, create a "Taste of La Quinta" cookbook to give away — collecting recipes from local restaurants. Then, at the City's booth, feature a chef from one of the local restaurants making samples of one of the cook book items for people to try (food is great for bringing people to booths). Revisit the passport program — If the passport program is successful this year, the City should consider repeating it again next year. This program is popular among local residents, and if the businesses benefit from the program, it would be a worthwhile effort for next summer, as well. Community Services Advertise opening of Civic Center Campus — Implement a major print and radio advertising campaign that informs the Valley about the new campus, and generates a large attendance to its grand opening event. Continue to advertise major Community Services events — Work closely with the Community Services Department to maximize exposure (within the department's specific budget parameters) for events such as the City Picnic, 5K Run, park and museum grand openings, etc. Implementation of the City's banner program — Research new areas within the community to implement the City's banner program, and create 3-4 different designs of banners for display during the Valley's busy season. 4. Support local events — Continue to support local events which support the City's marketing goals, such as the Mariachi Festival. 4nr Ong /finer 41Toodse 2002-2003 City of La Quinta Marketing Budget Economic Development Electronic Media $63,000 • Update infomercial and broadcast it in the Coachella Valley, the Inland Empire, San Diego and the Pacific Northwest. • Revise 10-second and 30-second economic development TV spots and continue to broadcast during Coachella Valley newscasts and other local programming. Economic Development Print Media & Promo Items $51,500 • Continue to advertise in print media vehicles which most effectively reach the target audiences for economic development, such as the Palm Springs Life Desert Cities Issue, the Bob Hope Chrysler Classic Program Guide, site locator trade publications, etc. • Order new promotional items. • Maintain advertising contingency account. Economic Development Events $14,650 • Advertise in the ICSC Program Guide, and provide a new "draw" for the City's ICSC booth (i.e., cookbook and chef promotion). • Continue sponsorship of County Fair and National Date Festival. Update City Collateral Materials $28,000 • Update City collateral materials, such as economic development presentation folder, brochures, etc. • Take new professional photography shots of the City, specifically "beauty shots". Business Retention $30,800 • Continue with La Quinta Passport program, an upscale shopping/dining incentive program. Community Services Advertising $123,800 • Implement seasonal banner program (included in this budget figure are banner design and printing costs, as well as the costs to implement the banner poles -- $75,000 of which is part of the C.I.P. budget). • Support local events, such as the Mariachi Festival. • Advertise in support of the Civic Center Campus grand opening, as well as park and museum grand openings. Consultant Retainer $36,000 Retainer fee to cover account service hours, planning, research, etc. TOTAL MARKETING BUDGET $347,750 ��C REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: 15 INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD Meeting May 8, 2002 I CALL TO ORDER Regular meeting of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board was called to order at the hour of 5:30 P.M. by Chairman Mahfoud, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. PRESENT: Board Members Moulin, Olander, Lewis, and Chairman Mahfoud, Board Member Osborne (5:35) ABSENT: Board Member Felice OTHERS PRESENT: John Falconer, Finance Director and Vianka Orrantia, Secretary II PUBLIC COMMENT - None III CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA IV CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approval of Minutes of Meeting on April 10, 2002 for the Investment Advisory Board. Board Member Moulin advised the Board that on page 2, section B second paragraph, last line, should be deleted: , _r!rr_�frrs� Board Member Moulin also advised the Board that on page 3, third paragraph, fourth/fifth line should read: Mr. Falconer stated that it would be up to the mod, am as to what is decided. And also on page 3, last paragraph should read: V7 Investment Advisory Board Minutes May 8, 2002 Board Member Moulin suggested that it reads "maturing efid 6 not more than five years." Board Member Moulin also advised the Board that page 5, third paragraph, eighteenth line should add the following: Board Member Moulin feels that a banking institution MM mummm is a lot more solid credit wise than commercial paper. Board Member Moulin, along with Mr. Falconer advised the Board that on page 6, first paragraph should read: It was the consensus of the Board to raise 6SE=s to 44 10 million except for Sallie Mae, which should remain, at $3 million. Board Member Lewis advised the Board that on page 2, under section B, first paragraph should read: Board Member Lewis briefly summarized the article (handout) that was obtained from Merrill Lynch, using Treasuries Nam MOTION - It was moved by Board Members Moulin/Olander to approve the minutes of Minutes of April 10, 2002 as corrected. Motion carried unanimously. V. BUSINESS SESSION A. Transmittal of Treasury Report for March 2002. In response to Board Member Lewis, asking about the decrease in cash Mr. Falconer advised the Board there was possibly one debt service payment and one large Capital Project bill due that caused a drop in the cash outflow. Mr. Falconer informed the Board that on page 3, "Annualized Earnings on investments," are below the City's benchmark, which is reflected on maturity, which is down to 35 days. Staff has been currently laddering the portfolio, investing in a two-year treasury, eighteen -month treasury 2 408 Investment Advisory Board Minutes May 8, 2002 and a one-year treasury. In response to Board Member Osborne, Mr. Falconer informed the Board that the low rates were due to the yield curve. Mr. Falconer advised the Board that he is using more of LAIF as same day short-term cash. Board Member Lewis suggested to the Board that on page 4, US Government Securities, fourth column titled "Yield Price," changing the word "Yield." Mr. Falconer advised the Board that he would check the title on the trade ticket and re -label the title. MOTION - It was moved by Board Members Lewis/Olander to review, receive and file the Treasurer's Report for March 2002. Motion carried unanimously. B. Consideration of Fiscal Year 2002/03 Investment Policy The Board reviewed the attached Investment Policy and changes/additions/deletions are shown in amended form. Board Member Moulin advised the Board that on page 1, Table of Contents, item IXX should read: IXX: Maximum MMWFity Board Member Lewis suggested moving IXX section to page 7, prior to Section V. Board Member Moulin felt that it should come after Section V. Chairman Mahfoud suggested that on page 3, of the Executive Summary, the sixth paragraph, third sentence that the $10 million dollar amount is misleading and suggested that it should read except amount or projected annual amount. Board Member Lewis advised the Board that the current amount under discussion is $10 million. Board Member Lewis advised the Board that a dollar amount is not mentioned in any other section of the policy. Mr. Falconer advised the Board that he would like to leave the Executive Summary as is. Chairman Mahfoud again suggested changing the wording to read "projected annual amount, not to be projected within the next five years. 3 40. Investment Advisory Board Minutes May 8, 2002 The Executive Summary and page 10 was amended as follows: ...except , the projected annual dollar amount as detailed in Section " V may be invested in U.S. Treasury bills, notes and bonds maturing between 2 and 5 years. Board Member Moulin suggested to the Board that on page 20, fifth column, under restrictions, sixth row, leaving at two years due to the fact that it has not changed the overall general policy. Board Member Osborne suggested to the Board that it change to "invest 2 to 5 years." Board Member Moulin suggested that placing the 2-year limitation with the word "except, "$10 million 2 to 5 years. Chairman Mahfoud agreed with Board Member Moulin in using the word "except." Board Member Lewis suggested to the Board that it should read "no more would be invested than 5 years. Board Member Osborne suggested it read "no more than $10 million would be invested up to 5 years." Board Member Lewis stated that the maximum maturity is limited to 5 years. Board Member Osborne suggested it read: "no more than $10 million invested in 2 to 5 years." Board Member Moulin advised the Board that they should strike out GSE's and 100% does not imply individually. Board Member Lewis stated that the State does not differentiate a breakdown. Mr. Falconer advised the Board that he would need to change GNMA line item on page 20. Board Member Moulin advised the Board that the maximum maturity column should be left blank and suggested that Mr. Falconer make the corrections. Board Member Moulin stated that it does not belong on the form. Mr. Falconer advised the Board that this could be eliminated. Motion — It was moved by Board Member Lewis/Olander to finalize the Fiscal Year 2002/03 policy at the next scheduled meeting. VI CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL A. Month End Cash Report — April 2002 In response to Board Member Moulin, Mr. Falconer advised the Board that the Sweep Account is now going into Dreyfus. Mr. Falconer also IH 410 Investment Advisory Board Minutes May 8, 2002 informed the Board that the negative balance does reflect on the City's book. Noted and Filed B. Pooled Money Investment Board Reports — January 2002 and February 2002 Noted and Filed VII BOARD MEMBER ITEMS Mr. Falconer updated the Board on the conference in Monterey, California that was attended by Staff, Board Members Olander and Mahfoud. Chairman Mahfoud advised the Board of the various meetings during the conference; the first meeting was how a municipality can raise money, the following day there were several meetings, cash flow forecast and short-term cash management and on Wednesday, there were several meetings held, one of interest was about LAIF. In previous year's attendance for this particular subject consisted of about 10 attendees, this year there was standing room only. Mr. Falconer advised the Board of the two Speakers, Elaine Parks, LAIF Administrator who replaced Pat Biehl and Bill Sherwood the Chief Investment Officer. Mr. Falconer informed the Board that there is a concern for the budget deficit, which is projected to be $22 billion and that the budget not be passed by June 30th. Mr. Falconer advised the Board that if the budget is not passed, Bill Sherwood went through the steps that LAIF would go through in order to maintain the State's perspective of cash needs and the borrowing techniques that would be implemented. Mr. Falconer advised the Board that it was similar to the 1998 scenario LAIF encountered. Mr. Falconer informed the Board, at this particular meeting he asked Mr. Sherwood about commercial paper and the difficulty obtaining quality paper. Mr. Sherwood approached it from a different perspective, they're limited to 180 days, where the City of La Quinta is at 270 and they cannot pay more than 10% of an issuers outstanding commercial paper, which sometimes they bump up. Mr. Falconer also advised the Board, that Mr. Sherwood addressed what would happen if the State does not pass the budget in time and the impact to LAIF. Mr. Sherwood stated that he has asked for written assurance from the State 5 411 Investment Advisory Board Minutes May 8, 2002 Controller that the State would not come after LAIF to meet the State's cash needs, at this current Mr. Sherwood has been assured verbally, but not in writing, and the City may need other liquid cash available. Mr. Falconer informed the Board, that the City of Palm Desert is trying to draft legislation, that the State cannot go after LAIF Funds, that these are ear marked for those agencies that participate in LAIF. Mr. Falconer also stated that if the City of Palm Desert is looking for sponsors. Board Member Osborne asked that in the February report, that it states "loans were for 6% of the fund," is there limit on that number? Mr. Falconer replied that he would have to look at the handbook. Mr. Falconer also advised the Board that they do not invest in any GSE's with imbedded options, "callables." Board Member Moulin asked what other cities were doing? Mr. Falconer replied that most agencies are investing 50 to 100% of their portfolio in LAIF. In response to Board Member Olander, Mr. Falconer stated to the Board that it does not matter whether it's a Republican or Democrat Administration, as long as things are running smoothly, the Treasurer can focus on their one or two core issues that they really want to focus and leave their day-to-day operations with the staff. Mr. Falconer expressed his concern to the Board referencing the key people in the state that have held their current positions for quite a length of time, such as Bill Sherwood with over 30 years experience, Bill Dodd, an investment officer with 30 years experience and Elaine Parks with 28 years, these key people could leave their positions at the same time and leave a void in the state. Board Member Olander informed the Board that there is also concern in regards to automobile tax and the receipts that may or may not be coming in, and surprising number of cities dependant on this tax if they do not come in. In response to Board Member Moulin, Board Member Olander advised the Board that there was not enough time to discuss how banks are picked for their time deposits. Mr. Falconer advised the Board that he spoke with Mr. Sherwood and they will be holding an annual LAIF Conference in September and we were welcome to attend or if a conference call about any concerns or questions, he would accommodate that call. In response to Chairman Mahfoud, Mr. Falconer informed the Board that when the state had it's budget problems in 1998, the state went into issuing warrants without a budget and the Jarvis Group, from the County of Los Angeles filed a law suit claiming that the state cannot be issuing warrants without a budget. There was a stay on this issue and an appeal was made and will be heard in June. Depending on the outcome, it will probably be appealed at the California 0 410 Investment Advisory Board Minutes May 8, 2002 Supreme Court. Mr. Falconer also informed the Board that if the budget is not passed that the State Controller has a handle on meeting the short-term needs of the agencies and does not want to impact the State's credit rating. Board Member Lewis asked Mr. Falconer what the difference between Pooled Loans and General Fund Loans? Mr. Falconer will get back to the Board on this issue. Board Member Osborne expressed his feelings about raising the percentage on LAIF and would not increase the percentage at this time. Board Member Lewis asked if LAIF had to be liquidated, would every agency get their money back? Board Member Osborne replied to the Board that it would probably depend on the market value of their portfolio. Mr. Falconer informed the Board that the state has liquidity percentages that they break the portfolio down to. Chairman Mahfoud advised the Board that attendance at the LAIF Conference would be strongly recommended. In response to Board Member Lewis, Mr. Falconer stated that there is a restriction on the amount you can take in and out of LAIF, per day. He also stated that LAIF has a market value at the end of the year. VIII ADJOURNMENT MOTION - It was moved by Chairman/Board Members Mahfoud/Osborne to adjourn the meeting at 6:45 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Submitted by, Vianka Orrantia Secretary 7 4.1 1 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA May 14, 2002 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:09 p.m. by Chairman Abels who asked Commissioner Tyler to lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Richard Butler, Steve Robbins, Robert Tyler, and Chairman Jacques Abels. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to excuse Commissioner Kirk. Unanimously approved. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez, Senior Engineer Steve Speer, Principal Planner Fred Baker, Associate Planners Greg Trousdell and Martin Magana, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Chairman Abels asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of April 23, 2002. Commissioner Tyler asked that Page 3, Item #3 be corrected to add the last name of the Community Development Director; and correct the spelling of the word "sight". There being no further corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Tyler to approve the minutes as corrected. Unanimously approved with Commissioner Robbins abstaining and Commissioner Kirk absent. B. Department Report: None V. PRESENTATIONS: None. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Environmental Assessment 20002-443, General Plan Amendment 2002- 084 Zone Change 2002-106, and Site Development Permit 2002-730; a request of Clubhouse Associates, L.L.C. for a recommendation for 414 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-14-02.wpd 1 Planning Commission Minutes May 14, 2002 certification of an Environmental Assessment; change the General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designation from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential; and approval of development plans for a 149 unit apartment complex and ancillary facilities located on a 10.75 acre triangular parcel on the south side of Avenue 52, east of Jefferson Street. 1 . Chairman Abels asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Robbins asked if this complex was age restricted. Staff stated no. 3. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to clarify their statement in regard to the access off Avenue 52 . Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated they will not be matched up with the access to the development across the street. The left turns are to be off -set from each other. Commissioner Tyler asked why there was not a full turning movement. Staff stated it would not comply with the General Plan. 4. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant wanted to address the Commission. Mr. Chuck Cockrell, representing the applicant, stated he was available for questions. 5. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Tyler stated the Commission had struggled with whether or not to require elevators. Mr. Cockrell stated they would address this and introduced Mr. Robert Kraft, architect for the project, who gave a presentation on the changes requested by the Commission and regarding elevators. Ms. Annie Gerard and Joyce Hummel, National Suvey Sysems, market study consultants, gave a presentation on the market study they completed on the site for what type of project would be best suited for this location. 6. Commissioner Tyler questioned whether the desert temperature was taken into consideration in their study. People who will live on the third floor will not want to go up and down the stairs in the high temperatures of the desert. Ms. Gerard stated their study has shown, even in Las Vegas, that this type of product is desired. 415 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-14-02.wpd 2 J I_ z Planning Commission Minutes May 14, 2002 7. Mr. Ron Isameda, landscape architect for the project, gave a presentation on the landscaping for the project. 8. Commissioner Robbins asked if it was in compliance with the City's Landscape Ordinance. Mr. Isameda stated it complied with the Ordinance. 9. Commissioner Butler asked about the architectural relief that was requested by Commissioner Kirk. Principal Planner Fred Baker explained the detail that had been added to the blank wall on the building in question. Commissioner Butler asked if all the areas of concern requested by the Commission had been addressed. Staff noted they had met most of the issues. 10. Commissioner Tyler asked about the material to be used on the "eyebrow arbor" along the rear of the project. Mr. Kraft stated they intended to use metal instead of wood. 11. Chairman Abels thanked the applicant for addressing their concerns, but he still had a problem with the lack of elevators. Mr. Kraft explained they had looked at how elevators could be integrated into the project. The average rise from floor to floor is only 11 feet and there are only four buildings this would apply to. In speaking to other developers in regard to a three story walk-up building and the answer he got was that with an urban setting and a central courtyard, it was not used. When they added the elevators they had no issue architecturally, but from the unit standpoint they have an issue. It brings the pedestrians along the front of the neighbors bedroom and livingroom space which causes the owner to live in an environment of closing the drapes to keep their privacy. They met with the Sheriff's Department and they voiced a concern in regard to indefensible space. 12. Commissioner Butler stated he could understand their reasoning on the stair walk, but he did not totally agree with the Sheriff's Department. Mr. Kraft explained the floor plan of the units in question. 13. Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment. There being no further public comment, the public participation 416 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-14-02.wpd 3 li fy, 3 Planning Commission Minutes May 14, 2002 portion of the hearing was closed and open for Commission discussion. 14. Commissioner Robbins stated he did not have a strong feeling on the elevators. His issue is the proposed chainlink fence along the All American Canal which is a safety factor. Staff noted a condition had been added to require the block wall. 15. Commissioner Tyler commended the applicant on his presentation and addressing the issues raised by the Commission. However, in his opinion he would not trade a view for a staircase. Commissioner Tyler asked if the access points between this project and the project to the north could not be better coordinated even if a General Plan Amendment was needed. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated it is 800 feet between the two turning movements on the south side of the street. 16. Chairman Abels stated he thought the elevators were necessary. 17. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-042, recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-443. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Kirk. ABSTAIN: None. 18. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-043, recommending approval of Zone Change 2002-106, as submitted. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Kirk. ABSTAIN: None. 19. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-044, recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2002-730, approving the elevation with the elevator and the revised conditions: a. Condition #80: A six foot block wall shall be required along the eastern property boundary adjacent to the All American -41.7 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-14-02.wpd 4 Ji.'� Planning Commission Minutes May 14, 2002 Canal. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Kirk. ABSTAIN: None. B. Site Development Permit 2002-731; a request of WG Properties, LLC for consideration of development plans for construction of a 8,792 square foot office building on a 1.51 acre parcel located at the east side of Washington Street, north of Lake La Quinta Drive, within the Lake La Quinta project area. 1. Chairman Abels asked if there was a motion to continue the project to May 28, 2002 as requested by the applicant. 2. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Robbins to continue the project to May 28, 2002. Unanimously approved. C. Environmental Assessment 2002-444, Conditional Use Permit 2002-069, and Site Development Permit 2002-732; a request of Southern California Presbyterian Homes and the City of La Quinta for: 1) Recommendation for certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact; 2) consideration of a Conditional Use Permit to allow an 81 unit, single story, senior apartment complex; and 3) Review of development plans for an 81 unit single story, senior apartment complex to be located at the southwest corner of Avenue 47 and Adams Street. 1. Chairman Abels asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Martin Magana presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Butler asked staff to clarify the need for the eight feet from the curbline to the wall. Staff stated yes, it would be eight feet from back of curb to the wall which is the property line. The Lake La Quinta Homeowners' Association would maintain from the wall to the curb and the applicant would maintain their portion of the property. Commissioner Butler asked if the Oleanders could be planted between the block wall and five foot setback. Staff stated they could plant any type of plant. V j.. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-14-02.wpd 5 Planning Commission Minutes May 14, 2002 Discussion followed in regard to the property line and the hedge. 3. Commissioner Tyler asked if a noise study had been conducted to determine the level of noise for the street. Staff clarified this street did not warrant a study. 4. Chairman Abels asked the size of the letters on the sign. Staff stated they are proposed for four inches by nine inches. Chairman Abels stated that is too small and should be at least one square foot in area. 5. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Ben Beckler, representing SCPH, stated they were available to answer any questions. 6. There being no questions of applicant, Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment. Mr. Dutch Dilsaver, 78-835 Dulce Del Mar, deferred his comments to the homeowners' association president. Mr. John Miller, Homeowners' Association President, 47-850 Via Nice, stated they were looking forward to having the project as their neighbor. The only issue was the lack of a block wall between the project and Lake La Quinta. The Oleander hedge is currently the only thing between the two projects. Staff met with them on the site to determine the property line and as explained it falls where the Oleanders are planted. The only two options are to do a lot line adjustment to put the lot line five feet behind the Oleanders or remove the Oleanders and put the block wall on the lot line. 7. Mr. Dutch Dilsaver, 78-835 Dulce Del Mar, stated he wanted the block wall installed prior to the beginning of construction and that the City take care of the chainlink fence along Avenue 47. 8. Ms. Renell Burch 47-145 Via Owieto, stated she was concerned with the Oleanders. These are beautiful and make a nice entry to the project and to rip them out is irresponsible. 9. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion. 10. Commissioner Tyler commended the applicant on the project. He questioned Condition #37 and asked that it be changed. He 419 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-14-02.wpd 6 vi3O Planning Commission Minutes May 14, 2002 appreciated the fact that the Oleanders have been present for a number of years, but it is known that they are susceptible to a disease prevalent in the desert and he would suggest a wall be constructed. 1 1 . Chairman Abels stated he is experiencing a similar problem with the Oleanders and is therefore in favor of the wall. 12. Commissioner Robbins complimented staff and the architect on the project. In regard to the Oleanders he believes there should be a wall and the Oleanders should be removed because of the amount of water they require. If planting material is desired, it could be planted with a more water efficient plant. The wall should be constructed after the grading. 13. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-045 recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-444, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Robbins Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Kirk. ABSTAIN: None. 14. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-046 approving Conditional Use Permit 2002-069, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Kirk. ABSTAIN: None. 15. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-0047 approving Site Development Permit 2002-732, as amended: a. Condition # 37: The swales shall be maintained by the applicants. b. Condition #76: Flat lenses shall be required on carports. C. Condition #81: A six foot high block wall matching the existing wall along the southern property line shall be 420 constructed prior to construction of any buildings and the G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-14-02.wpd 7 �, t', 7 Planning Commission Minutes May 14, 2002 Oleander hedge shall be removed. d. Condition #82: "Room and Information" signage shall be one square foot in size. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Kirk. ABSTAIN: None. Chairman Abels recessed the meeting at 8:46 p.m. and reconvened at 8:51 p.m. D. Specific Plan 99-036 and Site Development Permit 2002-734; a request of Sky West Corporation Centre Group, LLC and the City of La Quinta for: 1) Amendment of the text development standards and design guidelines for a 36 acre Specific Plan, and 2) review of architectural landscape, site, and lighting plans for a two story office building on 2.25 acres located approximately 800 feet east of Adams Street and on the north side of Corporate Centre Drive. 1. Chairman Abels asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if the project butted up against the storage center. Staff indicated the location on the site plan and stated it did not. 3. There being no questions of staff, Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Robert Wood, construction manager for Sky West Corporation gave a presentation on the project. 4. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Robbins stated that in the middle of the site there is a storm drain which has no grate with an eight foot hole that is full of trash and is dangerous and should be resolved before anything else happens. His other concern is the wall at the rear of the project; would the well site be walled off or will there be a hole in the wall. Mr. Wood explained there would be a six foot slumpstone wall around the entire facility. Across the wash they 421 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-14-02.wpd 8 Planning Commission Minutes May 14, 2002 are proposing a wrought iron fence to match to the J. Paul property. Commissioner Robbins asked if there was a blank space between this project and the storage area for the District well site. Mr. Scott Gaynor, master developer, explained they would take care of this. 5. Mr. Scott Gaynor, the master developer, stated they supported the project. He also asked that a classification of "retail" be added to Planning Areas #3 and #4. Commissioner Butler asked that a letter be received from the owner of PA #4 for the file granting approval. 6. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion. 7. Commissioner Tyler noted other miscellaneous changes that should be made on the Specific Plan. 8. Commissioner Robbins stated they will need to reroute a storm drain and get the new outlet approved by CVWD. 9. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-048 recommending approval of Specific Plan 99- 036, Amendment #1, as amended: a. "Retail" shall be added to Planning Areas #3 and #4 throughout the Specific Plan document, if requested by the property owner. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Robbins Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Kirk. ABSTAIN: None. 10. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-049 approving Site Development Permit 2002-734, as recommended: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Kirk. ABSTAIN: None. 4? G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-14-02.wpd 9 J 4 ' 3 Planning Commission Minutes May 14, 2002 VII. BUSINESS ITEMS: None. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. IX. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. Discussion regarding a joint meeting with the City Council on June 5, 2002. B. Commissioner Tyler gave a report on the City Council meeting of April 16, 2002. X. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Robbins to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held May 14, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 9:14 p.m. on April 23, 2002. Respe tfully submitted, B y Jk r, xecu IvY a Secretary City ofnta,California 423 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-14-02.wpd 10 'J 1 a MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA May 28, 2002 CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:09 p.m. by Chairman Abels who asked Commissioner Butler to lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Richard Butler, Tom Kirk, Steve Robbins, Robert Tyler, and Chairman Jacques Abels. C. Staff present: Community Development Director Jerry Herman, Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez, Senior Engineer Steve Speer, Principal Planners Stan Sawa and Fred Baker, Associate Planners Wallace Nesbit and Martin Magana, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II Iall:]I[*ZKe] A I"T 11: a Z11W,I III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Chairman Abels asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of May 14, 2002. Commissioner Tyler asked that Page 5, Item 2 be corrected to read, "The Lake La Quinta Homeowners' Association..."; Page 9, Item 4, change the word "march" to match". There being no further corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to approve the minutes as corrected. Unanimously approved with Commissioner Kirk abstaining. B. Department Report: None V. PRESENTATIONS: None. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Environmental Assessment 2002-448, Specific Plan 2002-056, and Site Development Permit 2002-731; a request of WG Properties, LLC for consideration of development plans for construction of a 8,792 square 42," G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 1 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 foot office building on a 1.51 acre parcel located at the east side of Washington Street, north of Lake La Quinta Drive, within the Lake La Quinta project area. 1 . Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Kirk asked if most of the site plan landscaping consisted of decomposed granite. Staff stated yes. Commissioner Kirk asked if the turf was only for the future office building, or will it be used elsewhere. Staff stated the turf along Washington Street will be retained for the retention basin; the turf for the future building is for dust control and aesthetics. Commissioner Kirk asked if the Specific Plan is a requirement in the Regional Commercial District. Staff stated no, the applicant did so because they exceeded the 22-foot height requirement. Commissioner Kirk asked if there was any other mechanism that would allow them to acquire the height limit without a specific plan. Staff stated there are provisions to allow an element to protrude beyond the height limitations, but this did not fall within that provision. 3. Commissioner Butler asked if the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee challenged the height of buildings. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated it is not within their purview. 4. Commissioner Tyler asked where the 150 foot setback line was on the plans. Staff indicated what page in the staff report and indicated the location on the site plan. Commissioner Tyler stated he was unable to find where the applicant had specifically requested to exceed the 22 foot height limit. Staff stated there was no specific verbiage in the plan; it is part of the site plan request. Staff asked if the Commission would like this clarified in the conditions for the Specific Plan. Commissioner Tyler asked that it be written into the Specific Plan. He asked about the three access points off Caleo Bay, if one was omitted it would give more parking. Discussion followed regarding the access points and parking spaces. 4 ?.� G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 2 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 5. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Robert Ricciardi, architect representing the applicant, gave a presentation on the project. 6. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Tyler stated he thought the trash trucks would have a difficult time getting in and out. Mr. Ricciardi stated it is a minimal impact as they would be in and out before the tenants arrived. To relocate it would require losing parking spaces. 7. Commissioner Kirk asked if he had any concerns about changing the architectural style on the second office building. Mr. Ricciardi stated they would like to keep the Spanish style. 8. Commissioner Robbins asked if the second building could go to 30 feet. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated no and staff would condition the height limits. 9. Chairman Abels asked if anyone else would like to address the Commission regarding this project. 10. Mr. Chuck Patelli, general contractor for the project, explained the purpose of the two driveways on Caleo Bay was to allow for the future second building and to give additional fire access. 11. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened the matter up for Commission discussion. 12. Commissioner Kirk asked if the Fire Department had requested the second access. Staff stated they did not. Commissioner Kirk asked if the applicant could have applied for a zone change, or was a specific plan required in order to obtained the additional height. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the Zoning Code requires the 22 foot height limit unless, there was a hardship to allow a variance, and in this case there was none. Commissioner Kirk stated he supported the project as it is a nice design. He stated Commissioner Tyler's comments regarding access and parking orientation are fair. He will vote "no" on the Specific Plan even though he will vote "yes" on the rest of the project because he is not in favor of a specific plan being solely used to change the height requirements. -+ G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 3 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 13. Commissioner Tyler asked if the approved restaurant to the south had any height variations. Staff stated no, it was 22 feet. Commissioner Tyler questioned why there was a statement in the conditions regarding how long it took to go through plan check. Senior Engineer Steve Speer explained the process. Commissioner Tyler stated it was a valid point, but did not belong in the conditions. Staff would remove the statement. 14. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-050 recommending certification of a Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-448, as submitted: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 15. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-051 recommending approval of Specific Plan 2002-056, subject to findings and conditions as amended: A. The future building pad elevation shall be a maximum 22 feet in height. B. The Specific Plan shall be changed to reflect that the building closest to Washington cannot exceed 30 feet as indicated in the site plan. C. Condition 20.E.: Eliminate the sentence regarding the time required for plan checking. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: Commissioners Kirk/Robbins. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 16. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-052 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2002-731, subject to findings and conditions as submitted. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, and Chairman Abels. NOES: Commissioner Tyler. ABSENT: None.427 ABSTAIN: None. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 4 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 A. Zoning Code Amendment 2002-072; a request of the City for a recommendation to the City Council to add Section 9.50.055-Second Floor Addition within an Existing Unit, to the La Quinta Municipal Code within the Residential Zones. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Community Development Director Jerry Herman presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to explain "excluding dormers". Staff stated the purpose was to exclude dormer windows and explained why. Commissioner Tyler asked why not allow any roof changes within five years. Staff explained this was to prevent a homeowner from changing their roof structure to allow room for the second story unit. Commissioners asked that Section "C" be deleted. Commissioner Tyler questioned allowing access from the garage as it would require a different set of fire regulations and should not be allowed. 3. Commissioner Butler asked if the roof's were altered would it not have to come back to the Planning Commission for a compatibility review. Staff stated yes, that would be a compatibility issue. 4. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion. 5. Commissioner Kirk supported the request with the deletion of Section "C". 6. Commissioner Butler agreed. 7. Commissioner Tyler asked that the option for a garage access be deleted. 8. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-053 recommending to the City Council approval of Zoning Code Amendment 2002-072, as amended: 428 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 5 i Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 Section A: Dormers are prohibited Section C: Deleted Section H: Delete "or garage" ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. D. Addendum to a Certified Riverside County Environmental Impact Report No. 232 (SCH #9164450613444, Environmental Assessment 2002-447. and Zone Change 2002-107; a request of Dave Twedt/Shea Homes for: 1) Certification of an Addendum to Certified Riverside County Environmental Impact Report No. 232 prepared for Specific Plan 218, Amendment #1 (Coral Mountain-525 acres); 2) Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Approximately 115 acres located within Section 34, Township 6 South, Range 7 East, not included in Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218 Amendment No. 1; and 3) Consideration of a Zone Change for preannexation zoning designations from Riverside County's SP (Specific Plan), A-1-10 (Residential Agriculture), and W-2 (Planned Development) to RL (Low Density Residential), RM (Medium Density Residential), GC (Golf Course), and OS (Open Space) for 640 acres in Riverside County. 1 . Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Martin Magana presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked why the City was not requesting agricultural zoning for the date farmer. Staff explained he is grandfathered in and would be allowed to continue farming for as long as wants to. 3. Commissioner Butler clarified it was a preannexation request. Staff stated yes. 4. Commissioner Kirk asked for clarification on why the Planning Commission was certifying two environmental analysis. Staff stated the Addendum was completed because an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was completed for the original project. Staff did an Addendum for the area not included in the first project. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 6 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 Commissioner Kirk asked if an agency could approve an Addendum to an EIR that was completed by a different lead agency. Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez stated it has been done before on advice of the City Attorney. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated this was done for the Coral Mountain project that has been annexed and for the area that is currently before LAFCO for annexation. 5. Commissioner Robbins asked if the entire section being considered was a part of the Zone Change and environmental before the Commission. Staff stated yes. Commissioner Robbins stated he would have to excuse himself due to a possible conflict of interest and withdrew from the dias. 6. There being no questions of staff, Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Rich Nowland, representing Shea Homes, gave a presentation on the project. 7. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Tyler questioned the property to the west as it did not look buildable due to the levy. Mr. Nowland stated there are two property owners in this area and they have plans for the property. 8. Chairman Abels asked if anyone else would like to address the Commission on this project. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion. 9. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-054 recommending certification of an Addendum to Riverside County Environmental Impact Report No. 232 prepared for Specific Plan 218 Amendment No. 1, pursuant to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman ABSENT: Commissioner Robbins. 10 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 7 Lf Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 10. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-055 recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-447, pursuant to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. 11. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-056, recommending approval of Zone Change 2002-107 subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Commissioner Robbins rejoined the Commission. D. Environmental Assessment 2002-450 and Specific Plan 2002-058; a request of Marvin Investments for certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and review of development principals and guidelines for a 127,517 square foot commercial complex in nine buildings on six acres located on the south side of Calle Tampico, between Avenida Bermudas and Desert Club Drive and the southeast corner of Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if Calle Tampico had a height restriction of 22 feet. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated it does have that designation; however, the Planning Commission and City Council adopted a General Plan policy that states this height limitation is not applicable to Calle Tampico. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to review the locations for the shared parking areas. 431 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 8 V� 3 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 3. Commissioner Kirk asked staff to characterize the use of the parking lot. Staff noted it is used very sparsely. Commissioner Kirk asked why the City built this parking lot. Staff noted it was intended to be supplemental parking for downtown uses. Commissioner Kirk asked about the final street improvements for La Fonda. Staff stated they are budgeted for the next fiscal year. Commissioner Kirk stated he had met with the applicant and had several informal discussions regarding the project. 4. Commissioner Robbins asked if staff was comfortable with the parking being provided on site. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the last projects reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission/City Council were approved with the shared parking policy. 5. Commissioner Tyler asked that the last sentence of Condition #21 be deleted. 6. Chairman Abels noted he too had met with the applicant in regard to the project. 7. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Wells Marvin, applicant, gave a presentation on the project and discussed conditions he would ask the Commission to modify or delete. Ms. Margo Thibeault, Mainiero Smith and Associates, asked for clarification on Condition #12, as they believe it will compromise their street -scene and street design and would like to request that no specification be required on the size of the width. They would like to work out the width of the utility easement with Imperial Irrigation District. Condition #51, there is an existing bus turnout on Avenida Bermudas and they are not proposing any changes or relocation to the bus stop so they are asking for clarification on the purpose of the condition. Condition #52 there are existing sidewalks on most of the perimeter of the site and clarified that where there are no sidewalks on Avenida Bermudas they will be installing sidewalks. On Avenida La Fonda the City will be completing the improvements and the sidewalks are complete on Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive. Condition #54 there is no room for pedestrian refuse. Condition #59 there are no retention basins on site and would like any reference to a retention basin deleted. Condition #61 refers to the bus turn out 430 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 9 �! t:� 3 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 again and they need clarification as to what is being required of them. Condition #88 they believe one driveway is sufficient for the overflow parking area. 8. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Kirk asked the applicant to explain the use of the palms for the primary street trees as they will not be providing shade. Mr. Marvin stated they are the same palms used in the center islands on Avenida La Fonda. They are providing 12- 14 foot arcades to provide shade to pedestrians on every elevation on the north side. The parking areas will have shade trees. Commissioner Kirk asked if there was an access point between the Arts Foundation and his project. Mr. Marvin stated there will be a space at this location, but not sure it will be an access point. Commissioner Kirk asked if Mr. Marvin was concerned about the mid -block crosswalk on Desert Club Drive because of the traffic speeds. Mr. Marvin stated he agrees with the sidewalk, but without the refuge and not at the location indicated by staff, as the road is not wide enough to make it practical. 9. Commissioner Kirk asked staff to address the concerns raised. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated that due to the applicant's reliance on parking that is on the far side of the street and not on its own site, the City parking lot takes up a significant amount of space on the west side of the street. Staff believes this will cause a lot of mid -block crossing if crosswalks are not defined. The City has installed it's first mid -block sidewalks on Calle Estado. The City is proposing the same on Desert Club Drive to create the same street scene where the pedestrian only have to cross 14-feet of street and then the refuge and 14 feet to the other side. Parking would not be allowed on either side of the street in this area. The crosswalk would also be raised to create a slight speed bump to slow traffic down. The same crosswalk design would be installed on Avenida Bermudas. Commissioner Kirk asked if it would not be better to direct pedestrians down the main street rather than to the parking lot. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated the location was chosen to not impede any left turns. Discussion followed as to crosswalk designs and locations. 10. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to explain a "pedestrian refuge". Senior Engineer Steve Speer explained it is a raised median with raised planters and a 45-degree cut -through between for the 433 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 10 ij 1 a Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 pedestrian traffic and would be approximately 10 feet wide. In regard to the other concerns raised, they would remove Condition #55 as it is covered in the specifications. Staff would not require a specific number of the trash receptacles until the site plans was submitted (Condition #84). In regard to the Imperial Irrigation District (IID) easement, staff will work with the applicant and IID in regard to the width for the public easement (Condition #12). Condition #52 is appropriate as written. In regard to the bus stop (Conditions #51 and #61), the City is asking them to work with Sunline in regard to their requirements. Condition #59, the "retention basin" would be deleted. 1 1 . Commissioner Tyler asked about Condition #87 which references a letter from the Sheriff's Department, it was not contained in their packet. Mr. Marvin stated they would work with the Sheriff's Department in regard to any of their concerns. 12. Commissioner Kirk noted that on Exhibit 13, on the north side of Main Street, there are two covered arcades, one with the arches which is outstanding and the other with a tiled pitched roof, where the parapet walls does not work. Mr. Marvin stated the look is to resemble the La Quinta Hotel shops. They want a variety of building styles with arcades to resemble the Santa Barbara look. In regard to the location of the crosswalk on Desert Club Drive he would prefer to have it at the end of the Main Street and again he does not think it would be appropriate to have a refuge at this location. There is no room on Desert Club Drive. In regard to the utility easements, this site is surrounded by existing street and they could have built it out without putting any streets through it. They can service with water and power all the buildings from the perimeter. If they have to put a five or ten foot easement on either or both sides of the street, it eliminates their ability to make the tree well sizes adequate for the palm trees. They are requesting they be able to work this out with IID In regard to the Sunline, if the City owns the street and accommodates Sunline, it should remain within the City's purview as to where the bus stop should be placed and not be up to Sunline. 13. Chairman Abels commended the applicant on his proposal and asked if there was any other public comment. There being no further public comment, the public participation portion of the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion. 434 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 11 `, l Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 14. Commissioner Robbins stated it is what the Village needs and he is generally in favor of the shared parking. 15. Commissioner Kirk agreed and stated he looks forward to the site plan. The applicant has made some strong points on the conditions and the applicant should be able to come to a compromise with staff on the conditions. 16. Commissioner Butler agreed it has been a long time coming and he is glad to see the project in process. 17. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-057 recommending to the City Council certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2002-450, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 18. It, was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Robbins to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-058 recommend approval of Specific Plan 2002-058, subject to the findings and conditions as amended: A. Condition #12: Delete B. Condition #21: Delete the sentence referring to the time for plan check. C. Condition #51: Delete the word "relocate" D. Condition #54: Delete as it will be reviewed during the site development permit process for Phase II and III. E. Condition #55: Delete F. Condition #59: Delete the word "retention basin". G. Condition #61: Delete as it will be reviewed during the site development permit process for Phase II and III H. Condition #84: Delete I. Condition #88: Provide one driveway rather than two. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 4 3 5 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 12 l-f 1 7 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 Chairman Abels recessed the meeting at 9:00 p.m. and reconvened at 9:05 p.m. E. Environmental Assessment 2002-451 and Site Development Permit 2002-736: a request of Tenet Care California, Inc. for Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and review of building elevations and landscaping plans for a 25,486 square foot medical facility located on the east side of Washington Street between Avenue 47 and 48. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked why the access on Caleo Bay is not aligned with Dulce Del Mar. Staff explained it was for shielding to the accesses to their project. 3. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Jim Henry, representing the applicant, gave a presentation on the project. In regard to the off -set driveway they would like to shield the traffic so those exiting would be able to se into the other development. Following discussion, it was determined to line up the two access points. 4. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion. 5. Commissioner Tyler stated it was a great addition to the neighborhood, meets the heights limits, the parking is adequate, but he would like the driveways aligned. 6. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-059 recommending to the City Council Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-451, as recommended. 436 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 13 ,' 13 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 7. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-060 recommend approval of Site Development Permit 2002-736, subject to the findings and conditions as amended: A. Condition #16: Delete the sentence regarding plan check timing. B. Condition #66: Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing the driveways aligning with the Dulce Del Mar to be approved by the Community Development Director. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. F. Environmental Assessment 2002-441 and Tentative Tract Maa 30378 a request of Rod Vandenbos for Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and approval to subdivide 9.13 acres into 8 residential lots and other common lots located at the southwest corner of Avenue 51 and Madison Street. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked why the applicant was responsible for the full width and not the half width of the street in Condition #8, #56. Staff would correct the conditions to only require 55 feet on the west side. Commissioner Tyler asked if "Beth Circle" was the proposed name for the access off of Madison Street. Staff stated that is the existing name of the street. The applicant will be applying for a street name change at a later date. The site is mapped and recorded but there are no streets. Commissioner Tyler asked about the issues raised in the letter from Mrs. McGinty. Staff stated some of the issues are at the Commission's 437 discretion. In regard to the partially finished building, it is a G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 14 A 4 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 permitted storage building. Commissioner Tyler asked if the property is rezoned, is the second building permitted. Staff stated the applicant intends to convert the building to a guest house or garage. 3. Commissioner Kirk asked what justification does the City have to require the applicant to retain the citrus. Staff stated the applicant has stated his desire to do so, therefore staff conditioned it. The first row and maybe the second row is intended to be integrated into the setback landscaping. Commissioner Kirk asked if the City could do this if it was not a mitigation measure. Staff stated yes. 4. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Rod Vandenbos, 79-110 Christian Court, the applicant, gave a presentation on the project. 5. Commissioner Tyler asked if the trees abutting the Green Valley Ranches development would be retained. Mr. Vandenbos stated the goal is to keep as many of the trees as possible, but several are damaged and not worth retaining. He is working with the neighbors to resolve the issues. The "agricultural building" is being finalized and will be used for farming equipment and supplies. 6. Mr. David Turner, Coachella Valley Engineers, questioned Conditions #8 which has now been addressed by staff. Condition #22. A., B., & C they would like to request "bonded for" rather than "prepared". Condition #36 they need some flexibility in regard to the pad heights to allow them to retain as many of the trees as possible. Conditions #42 and #45 they would like to request the maximum percolation rate be four to six inches per hour rather than two inches and the retention depth not exceed four feet. Condition #56.A.1.a.b. if a six foot meandering sidewalk and 14 foot multipurpose they would not be able to retain as many trees. They would like to request waiting to see what the City of Indio requires for across the street and work in conjunction with them. Condition #56.13 and #60 they would like to request the same, see what the City of Indio requires across the street. They would like some flexibility in regard to the turning movements. Condition #66 they would like to have deleted. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 15 433 o! 15 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 7. Commissioner Butler asked if the street improvements would be bonded for future construction of the streets. Mr. Turner stated yes. Commissioner Butler asked the reason for the right turn restriction. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated it is required by the General Plan. In regard to the turning movement, staff would be willing to wait to see what develops on the other side of the street. 8. Commissioner Tyler asked if there was any conservative effort with the City of Indio to design this street. Staff stated there was none not at this time. 9. Commissioner Kirk asked about the retention basins and percolation rates. Staff stated the percolation rate, size, and depth are determined by City Ordinance. If you do on -site, on -lot retention, the Ordinance calls for the lots to be no smaller than two and one half acres. The intent is to keep it shallow to keep it safe. 10. Commissioner Tyler asked about the pad height. Staff stated there are no pads. Discussion followed regarding the pad elevations. Mr. Vandenbos stressed the need to have a full movement. Staff stated the only way it can be changed is with a General Plan Amendment 11. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion. 12. Commissioner Tyler stated at this time this street is not a major street. He asked if a General Plan Amendment could be applied for to address the entry. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated it would require amending the General Plan. 13. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-061 recommending to the City Council Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-441, as recommended. 439 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 16 l� Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 14. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-062, recommend approval of Tentative Tract Map 30378, subject to the findings and conditions as amended: A. Condition #8: the applicant shall construct 55 foot half width B. Condition #22.A.: The applicant shall contribute to the design cost. C. Condition #22.13: Delete. D. Condition #22.C: The applicant shall construct the perimeter landscaping E. Conditions #36 & 37: Delete F. Condition #56A.1.a.b.: The applicant shall construct a 10- foot multipurpose trail. G. Condition #87: Preserve one row of existing citrus trees on the north perimeter of the project. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. H. Site Development Permit 2001-721; a request of Coachella Petroleum, Inc. for consideration of a shade structure for a vehicle service area located at 78-988 Highway 111 (Jiffy Lube). 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked if the shade structure would be visible from Adams Street. Staff stated yes. 3. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion. 4 4 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 17 ,17 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 4. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-063, approving Site Development Permit 2002- 721, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. VII. BUSINESS ITEMS: A Sign Application 2002-616; a request of Graphic Resources for Champion Cadillac (formerly Simon Motors) for review of existing signage to reflect new ownership and new sign types located at the southwest corner of Simon Drive and Highway 1 1 1 1. Chairman Abels asked for the staff report. Community Development Director Jerry Herman presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to explain the disadvantage in Finding "B". Staff explained the location. 3. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Skip Berg, Graphic Resources, representing the applicant gave a presentation on the sign program. He requested maintaining the 12-foot sign at the corner of Simon Drive and Highway 111. 4. Chairman Abels asked the height of the other monument signs on Highway 1 1 1. Staff stated they are all eight feet. In regard to the pennants, banners, and balloons, additional height can be allowed if there is a disadvantage. In this instance, there is no disadvantage. 5. Commissioner Robbins stated he was not opposed, but did not know what mechanism could be used. Staff stated they can appeal it to the City Council, but it will require a specific plan. 441 .i G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 18 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 6. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation and opened the matter for Commission discussion. 7. Commissioner Robbins asked if there was a provision to allow the pennants. Staff stated if pennants were determined to be an alternative sign, they could be permitted. 8. The Commission determined that the requested pennants and flags are not alternative signs and that the applicant needs to apply for a specific plan. 9. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Butler to adopt Minute Motion 2002-010, approving Sign Application 2002-616, as recommended. Unanimously approved. Vill. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None. IX. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. Discussion regarding a joint meeting with the City Council on June 5, 2002. B. Commissioner Tyler gave a report on the City Council meeting of May 21, 2002. X. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Kirk to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held June 11, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. This meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned at 10:24 p.m. on May 28, 2002. Respectfully submitted, Be y J ye , Exec tYa ive Secretary City of -La Quinta, California 440 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 19 i j 13 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: =? MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA May 1, 2002 I. CALL TO ORDER 10:00 a.m. A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Committee was called to order at 10:07 a.m. by Principal Planner Fred Baker who led the flag salute. B. Committee Members present: Dennis Cunningham, Bill Bobbitt, and David Thorns. C. Staff present: Management Analyst Debbie Powell, Principal Planner Fred Baker, Associate Planner Greg Trousdell, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Principal Planner Fred Baker asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of April 3, 2002. There being no corrections, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Thoms/Bobbitt to approve the Minutes as submitted, with Committee Member Cunningham abstaining. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Site Development Permit 2001-734; a request of Sky West Corporate Centre Group LLC to review architectural and landscaping plans for a multiple tenant two story light industrial building located on the north side of Corporate Centre Drive and east of Adams Street. 1. Associate Planner Greg Trousdell presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Thoms asked staff to clarify their concerns in GAWPDOCS\.A LC\5-1-02.wpd 1 44.1 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes May 1, 2002 regard to the landscaping. Staff stated the representation was acceptable, but more definition in the plant pallet was needed. Committee Member Thorns noted the palms were proposed for 24 feet. Staff confirmed they would be 24 feet. 3. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the applicant would like to make a presentation. Mr. Robert Wood, representative of Sky West Corporate Centre Group, stated he was available to answer any questions. 4. Committee Member Bobbitt asked how the AC units would be hidden on the flat roof. Staff explained the applicant would need to explain. 5. Committee Member Cunningham asked if there was a condition to make sure this is addressed. Staff stated it was contained in the Specific Plan. Discussion followed as to examples of problems where it had occurred. 6. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if there was any concern with the carport detail showing wood. Committee Member Cunningham stated he would recommend they convert it to steel as there is no maintenance, but this can be cost preventative. Therefore, he would only make it a recommendation and not a condition. 7. Committee Member Thorns asked the height of the vertical element. Also the post is a 4 by 4 and seems too small. Mr. Wood stated they are steel posts and 3 x 3 joists. Mr. Wood stated they are looking at the composite beams. 8. Committee Member Thorns asked if staff would be reviewing the final landscaping plans. Staff stated yes. Mr. Wood gave an explanation of what the plant list would consist of. 9. Committee Member Thorns stated the area between the parking spaces and the wall is never maintained and he would suggest vines be planted on the inside and decomposed granite on the ground. 10. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2002-015 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-734, subject to the conditions as submitted and amended:4 4 4 J�? G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\5-1-02.wpd 2 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes May 1, 2002 A. Mechanical equipment to be hidden and not seen from the street. B. Vines to be planted along the interior planter wall in lieu of shrubs along the perimeter walls on every fourth parking stall. C. Add shrubs to the interior islands. D. If possible use steel on carports in lieu of wood as an options. Unanimously approved. B. Site Development Permit 2001-736; a request of Tenet Care California, Inc., for review of building elevations and landscaping plans for a 25,486 square foot medical facility located on the east side of Washington Street between Avenue 47 and Avenue 48. 1. Committee Member David Thoms withdrew due to a possible conflict of interest and withdrew from the meeting. 2. Principal Planner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3. Mr. Dan Kilabrew, RTKL Architects for the project, gave a presentation on the project and introduced Margo Thibeoult, Mainiero Smith, engineers for the project and TGA, landscape architect. 4. Committee Member Cunningham asked if this project had been presented to the homeowners at Lake la Quinta. Mr. Kilabrew stated it was and had been well received. They are trying to reflect the use of the building as being user friendly. Committee Member Cunningham stated it is fresh and dynamic look and gives regional architecture to the site. 5. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the introduction of the different architectures approved for Washington Street, has added to the eclectic look of the street. It is an excellent presentation and the landscaping plans looks good. 6. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by G:\WPDOCSWRLC\5-1-02.wpd 3 44 5 JL 3 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes May 1, 2002 Committee Member Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2002-016 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2001-736, subject to the conditions as submitted. Unanimously approved with Committee Member Thorns being absent. Committee Member Thoms rejoined the Committee. C. Commercial Property Improvement Program 2002-012; a request of Scott Wilson for funding of landscaping/hardscape improvements for the property located at 78-150 Calle Tampico; and D. Commercial Property Improvement Program 2002-013; a request of Denise DeBerry-Hay for funding of landscaping/hardscape improvements for the property located at 78-140 Calle Tampico. 1. Management Analyst Debbie Powell presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Mr. Ray Martin, landscape designer for the project, gave a presentation on the project. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if a sign would be constructed at the corner. Mr. Martin explained what was there and how it would be difficult as they wanted to remove the center island. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if the parking stall sizes met City standards. Staff stated they would when constructed. 4. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the micro -drip systems do not work and he has a problem with over -watering done by drip systems. They need a water conservation system. He would prefer individual drip emitters and no spaghetti tubing. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the plant pallet it fine; maintenance is more of a concern. 5. Committee Member Thorns stated the planting between the walls and cars decreased. On Season Way the streetscape needs something planted on the wall. The gravel is all right. 6. Committee Member Bobbitt stated that planting right up to the curb line gets trampled by the cars. 7. Committee Member Cunningham stated he has a problem with the amount of City funds that has already been spent. Now with a 4 4 9 G:\WPDOCS\ARLC\5-1-02.wpd 4 ,1; Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes May 1, 2002 new owner we are spending additional funds. Mr. Scott Wilson stated they had an issue with it as well. Committee Member Cunningham stated the applicant bought the project and knowing what they bought. In his opinion, this is not the purpose of the program. It is for project that have history and the owners show they will be there for the long run. Mr. Wilson stated the biggest problem they have had with the building has been the reputation of the prior owners. He went on to explain what work they have already done to improve the looks and function of the building. 8. Committee Member Bobbitt asked where the funds went that were previously approved for this project. Committee Member Cunningham explained that the previous owner had obtained the funds and planted the material and it died. 9. Staff explained the program is to help business owners to upgrade their property to create a more cohesive and attractive environment for the entire Village area. 10. Committee Member Bobbitt asked who owns the property. Mr. Wilson explained. 11. Committee Member Cunningham asked if this could be referred to staff to see what the spirit of where and how the money should be spent could be better explained to the Committee as he is not comfortable approving the project at this time. 12. Committee Member Bobbitt agreed. He applauds the applicant for wanting to clean up the site, but he would like staff to define the purpose of the funds/program. 13. Committee Member Thoms stated the project needs help. It is an eyesore. He however, does not have enough experience with the program to decide how the funds should be used. Based on what is proposed he would approve the expenditure. 14. Mr. Wilson asked if the problem was the previous owners, or the double application. Committee Member Cunningham stated it was a combination of both. He would not want to hold them accountable for the previous owners work, but collectively the past history is the problem. Therefore, he would like staff to give a better presentation on what the "spirit" of the funds. 15. There being no discussion, it was moved and seconded by 4 4 -7 Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to continue both r G:\WPDOCS\AnC\5-1-02.wpd 5 k' k" 5 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee Minutes May 1, 2002 projects to give staff time to give the Committee a better definition as to the purpose of the funds for the Commercial Property Improvement Program. Unanimously approved. E. Site Development Permit 2001-731, Site Development Permit 2001-732, and Site Development Permit 2002-733; consideration of a motion to rescind Minute Motions 2002-01 1, 2002-013, and 2002-014 recommending approval of the above -noted cases to the Planing Commission at the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee Meeting of April 3, 2002. 1. Staff explained the reason for rescinding the motion. 2. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Member Cunningham/Bobbitt to adopt Minute Motion 2002-019, rescinding Minute Motions 2002-01 1, 2002-013, and 2002-014 recommending approval of the above -noted cases to the Planing Commission at the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee Meeting of April 3, 2002. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None Vill. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Bobbitt/Cunningham to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee to a regular meeting to be held on June 5, 2002. This meeting was adjourned at p.m. on May 1, 2002. Respectfully submitted, TY Axcutive Secretary QCity oWCEfornia HM o ' 0" GAVYTD0CS\ARLC\5-1-02.wpd 6 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: /9 MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA April 18, 2002 This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by Chairman Maria Puente at 3:01 p.m. who led the flag salute and asked for the roll call. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call. Present: Commissioners Irwin, Mitchell, Sharp, Wright, and Chairman Puente. Staff Present: Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Secretary Carolyn Walker. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. Ill. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Sharp to approve the Minutes of March 21, 2002 as submitted. Commissioners approved with Commission Irwin abstaining. V. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for Tentative Parcel Map 30550: a request for approval of the Cultural Resources Assessment of an 80 + acre parcel located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive. Applicant: Dutch Parent N.V. (NAI Consulting) Archaeological Consultant: Archaeological Advisory Group (James Brock, RPA) 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 449 PACAR0LYN\HPC4-18-02.wpd -1- Historic Preservation Commission Minutes April 18, 2002 2. Commissioner Mitchell concurred with staff's recommendations and stated he was pleased to see the monitoring would be required on this project since it was a sensitive area for cultural resources. 3. Commissioner Wright agreed with staff's recommendations. 4. Commissioner Irwin also agreed with staff's recommendations, in particular with the on -going monitoring. She informed the commission she had been doing research on Iona MacKenzie, who was rumored to be an early postmistress in Indio, as well as Raymond Darby. She would share her research with the Commission when it is completed. 5. Commissioner Sharp concurred with the findings and stated he was curious why no evidence of ancient habitation was found at the site since it is in an area where items have previously been found in great quantities. 6. Commissioner Mitchell stated he suspected there was a lot of sand deposition there making the signs of habitation more difficult to uncover. He also commented he was pleased to see there would be monitoring during grading in an area considered to be very sensitive. 7. Chairman Puente agreed with staff's recommendations. 8. Applicant's representative, Kris Schultz, asked if the Commission had any issues or concerns with realigning Darby Road. The Commission had no issues with realignment as it was not part of their purview. 9. Commissioner Mitchell did comment that a good comprehensive job of recordation of this type of a linear site usually exhausts the research potential of a road of this nature. 10. Applicant's representative, Mike Rowe, had a couple of questions regarding having the Phase II study completed before the entitlements are completed. Since the applicant will have to make presentations to the Planning Commission and the City Council he asked if there was any way that the entitlements could be done P:\CAROLYN\HPC4-18-02.wpd -2- 450 5O i jh�� Historic Preservation Commission Minutes April 18, 2002 before recordation of the final map. He commented he understood Phase II was necessary to gather information for a plaque. 11. Commissioner Irwin stated the Phase II study involved more than just placement and information for a plaque. 12. Applicant's representative, Mike Rowe asked if the Phase II report could be submitted prior to the tract map for the property being recorded, instead of before approval of theproject by the City.. 13. Stan Sawa stated it could be done that way. 14. There was general discussion about the fact that Iona C. MacKenzie was a long name for a street. It was the general consensus this was an issue for the Planning Commission. Staff agreed. 15. Commissioner Mitchell asked a question about wells on the property and historical materials that may be found in those wells. 16. Applicant's Representative Mike Rowe stated the depth of the wells are usually several hundred feet and too deep to excavate with a back hoe. 17. Staff recommended the condition be changed to require the Phase II report be submitted to the City prior to recordation of a final tract map, leaving plenty of time to approve the wording of a plaque before the actual project is completed. 18. Commissioner Irwin stated she would like to see the Phase II report since it concerns more than just the wording of a plaque. 19. Staff confirmed the Commission wanted to see the Phase II report before the project was approved by City Council. 20. Commissioner Irwin replied that was correct since it was the Commission's standard procedure. 21. Commissioner Wright concurred. 22. Commissioners Irwin and Wright did state the Commission would change a meeting date to accommodate the developer. P:\CAROLYN\HPC4-18-02.wpd -3- 451 JA Historic Preservation Commission Minutes April 18, 2002 23. Staff re -confirmed the conditions would be left as stated in the staff report to which the Commissioners agreed. 24. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Irwin to adopt Minute Motion 2002-009 recommending approval of the Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for Tentative Parcel Map 30550. Unanimously approved. B. Review of Certified Local Government Annual Report: for review by Commissioners. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the Annual Report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. There was general discussion and corrections were given to staff to update/correct the report. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS A. Commissioner Wright brought in a newspaper article about the Neutra House which was recently demolished in the City of Rancho Mirage. He was quite concerned this could happen to an internationally renowned architecture, with the City's permission. He also stated he thought somebody should contact the author of the article, Mr. Guzman, and let him know the City of La Quinta has a Historical Preservation Commission since the article only mentioned a Commission in Palm Springs. B. Chairman Puente asked if the Commissioners had received all the information about the upcoming Conference. Staff replied all the reservations were completed and registration/ticket packets were now available in the Community Development Department, for all the Commissioners. VIII. ADJOURNMENT P:\CAROLYN\HPC4-18-02.wpd -4- 450 �� 4 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes April 18, 2002 There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Irwin to adjourn this meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission to the next regularly scheduled meeting to be held on May 16, 2002. This meeting of the Historical Preservation Commission was adjourned at 3:24 p.m. Unanimously approved. Submitted by: av ly alker G Secretary 4 5 '? " e 5 -5- DEPARTMENT REPORT: 5" A JUNE 20 JULY 2 JULY 16 AUGUST 6 AUGUST 20 SEPTEMBER 3 SEPTEMBER 17 OCTOBER 1 OCTOBER 15 CITY COUNCIL'S UPCOMING EVENTS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING -10:00 A.M. BUDGET CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING - CANCELLED CITY COUNCIL MEETING - CANCELLED CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING 454 June 2002 La Quinta City Council Monthly Planner i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6:00 PM CVAG 2:00 PM City 10:00 AM ALRC Exec - Pena Council Meeting 7:00 PM Special City Council/ Planning Commis- sion Meeting 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V. 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM Energy/ Safety -Perkins Mosquito Abate. Pena Envi-Sniff 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins 5:30 PM Invest- 6:00 PM Volun- -Perkins 7:00 PM Planning ment Advisory teer Firemen Flag Day 6:00 PM League Commission Board Apprec. Dinner of Cities-Riv.Div. Meeting 7:00 PM Cultural 7:00 PM Commu- Arts Commission nity Services Commission 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 9:00 AM CVB- Henderson 10:00 AM Special„ City Council Father's Day 2:00 PM City Council Meeting Meeting - Budget 1 st Day of 3:00 PM Historic Summer Preservation Commission 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 4:00 PM CVAG- 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM LAFCO- Exec. Com-Pena Commission Human/Comm- Henderson 6:00 PM CVAG Meeting Adolph General 4:00 PM DRRA Assembly Airp-Henderson Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 6/12/2002 4 55 July 2002 La Quinta City Council Monthly Planner 1 2 3 4 5 6 2:00 PM City 10:00 AM ALRC Council Meeting Independence Day (City Hall Closed) z, a 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V. 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM Energy/ Safety -Perkins Mosquito Abate. Pena Envi-Sniff 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins 5:30 PM Invest- 7:00 PM Cultural -Perkins 7:00 PM Planning ment Advisory Arts Commission 6:00 PM League Commission Board of Cities-Riv.Div. Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 9:00 AM CVB- 3:00 PM Historic Henderson Preservation 2:00 PM City Commission Council Meeting 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM LAFCO- Commission Human/Comm- Henderson Meeting Adolph 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson 28 29 30 31 ur . 6:00 PM CVAG1 ' "_ Exec Com-Pena June August '% W T F S S M T W T F S S M T 1 2 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8" 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 11 12 13 14 15 9 % 17 18 19 20 21 22 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 G 30 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 4 Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 6/12/2002 August 2002 La Quinta City Council Monthly Planner Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Satur ay 1 2 3 JulySeptember S MT W T F S �b S M T W T F S',. 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 �9 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 a 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 a "":? 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Yea �... �. 28 29 30 31 �*," 29 30 r,4 4 W.. r .'. i., 2:00 PM City 10:00 AM ALRC 12:00 PM Energy/ Council Meeting Envi-Sniff 7:00 PM Cultural Arts Commission 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V. 9:00 AM RCTC- 3:00 PM Historic Safety -Perkins Mosquito Abate. Pena Preservation 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins 5:30 PM Invest- Commission -Perkins 7:00 PM Planning ment Advisory 6:00 PM League Commission Board of Cities-Riv.Div. Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 9:00 AM CVB- 9:00 AM LAFCO- Henderson Henderson 2:00 PM City Council Meeting - CANCELLED 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 6:00 PM CVAG- 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM CVAG Exec Com-Pena Commission Human/Comm- Meeting Adolph 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 6/12/2002 457 September 2002 La Quinta City Council Monthly Planner Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday F��iday Saturday 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2:00 PM City 10:00 AM ALRC 12:00 PM Mayors Council Meeting Lunch t4 - CANCELLED Labor Day (City Hall Closed) 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V. 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM Energy/ Safety -Perkins Mosquito Abate. Pena Envi-Sniff 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins 5:30 PM Invest- 7:00 PM Cultural -Perkins 7:00 PM Planning ment Advisory Arts Commission 6:00 PM League Commission Board of Cities-Riv.Div. Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission Patriot Day 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 9:00 AM CVB- 3:00 PM Historic Henderson Preservation 2:00 PM City Commission Council Meeting 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM LAFCO- Commission Human/Comm- Henderson Meeting Adolph 1 st Day of 4:00 PM DRRA Autumn Airp-Henderson 29 30 6:00 PM CVAG`� Exec Com-Pena August October S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 m 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 �m 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 y w 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 27 28 29 30 31. s, Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 6/12/2002 4 1; 9 IV 4 6TAI;j IIIJ 1 i i T U rY c�MOFT9 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tom Hartung, Director of Building & Safety l +4' DATE: June 18, 2002 RE: Monthly Department Report - May 2002 Attached please find the statistical summaries for building permits, Animal Control, Code Compliance, and business licenses for the month of May. The reports depict the following highlights: • Year to date building permit valuation is $77,708,655.59 which represents an issuance of 1,428 building permits through May; • 1,1 1 1 animal control cases have been handled through May; • 1,094 code compliance cases have been initiated through May; • 10 new licenses were issued to La Quinta based businesses in May; • $1,550.00 - garage sale permit income in May; • $1,180.00 - Senior Center income in May: New Life Community Church $ 550.00 Sandoval Wedding Reception 630.00 $1,180.00 459 y o O O O (D M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl) O O rl- (o W❑ U E» O 69 O 69 O 69 O 69 o iH O fA O 69 O 69 0 69 O O 64 N N O O O O (n CCl)r N rn 69 69 69 rl- W)JV Cl) 69 � U J m 00 f` O O V (D O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl) O O I- N d f� O u> to 0 O 69 O fA O fA O 69 O 6H O fA O 69 O b9 O 69, O N N O O 0 O (n M N M 0 0 69 69 64 69 r- &0 _Z O 69 N H Q, tN - Q O O O N M N M M (fl (n O O O O U) 00 V' O O N (n CDCD (D (n V N V M (D In M M V 0 69 (D N C (D O (D (n 00 co N OD M a)N U) O In co U) N 0) M (D (n O t` o rl ❑ r- in v O - M O rl- N v (D 00 O N U) O N M fo0 O N EA 69 N CO 69 ff-? t` 69 69 M O (n W _ 69 69 N isi ifi o0 W 04 r' U- (n �t 0 O r CD v O O 00 O (q O O O In 00 N O O (n O (D (D O (D l(7 N (n V' n O M V aC V O ifl (n M O M N N IT M (D N (n M N M IT W O V' V• (n 0 Cl) (D c-- N r- CD2 W H o N O O 64 69 (D 64 M V' .- O rl- 00 v O O Cl) O 4. f 69 69 69 � 0 M 69 69 if> 60MA 64 N to 69 fA in o o v o N 00 O O O O 0 O _ O O O O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O V' W)1- M (n O 0 (D V O (D O M (n O O (D 00 O 00 D) 00 m ❑ O 69 00 In M t` (n 00 M M (D O O O O '7 O N (n O 69 00 O N I'- V (D 0) ~ O O N m V) (D r-(n Cl) (n M (D (D N U ui N J Cl) Cl) N N 69 Cl) 69 (D O (n N O Cl)69 V' O0 N fA V 6» 69 V) I` N (D 6fl V• cD (fl Vk 69 6-a b9 r; Q F- z CID6 e» r- H N O 64 1 1 6% Q o o v o o O o o (n o O o_ 0 0_ o 0 o m O O O t` N V O V O O O r 0 N Ci (j0 N O O o V O N 0 (D 0 (n O Cl) O (n 00 O O O N Q F- p -r Q r- t` FA r- O (r) (V O O cc 00 .-- O o N M O O O V O (n Q' In (D v O O 00 N 00 h iD J� N M O 00 (O .- N o N V (f) (n U7 O O 00 LL ZO } N O O Cl) N r- N O V' Cl) r- r- R O Q a< CD N .- N M 69 M M - N 69 r- c 69 r- M N 69 69 69 to b9 69 L1 VLO 69 69 69 69 69 r- U Z _ p 0 o v (n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_ o o_ 0 0 o fr m M O (D O O O O O (O O O (n O O N D Z O O N L) O a)0 r- O 0 V' v 00 O (n N W CIO O S 0 O 6R N (D O (0 t` O N 0 r- 64 O O W O M N M U Z O U) (O V' V' (D V' O cc V' O M N O V N 0 (D M rf N 69 N CD I- 69, N O N b4 to M O Cl) r- N 00 r- 00 O Cl) 69 69 69 M 'fl r- 6H ifl N OO (n (n 69 69 69 N - - K U7 O O '7 M r- U O V N n M 0 M O L Cl) (MD Lr) O } J N 0 00 Cl) 0 rA (n 00 lr7 rl- Cl) 0 0 (D r- O a0 M co N N a)M O 0 CD N N N } Z z L = J O m wU W t` W O N 00 (n co N O I` In o N O .- o ❑ O p 0- O 2 M Z ❑ N ❑ c N �t Z F- (n Q W ui a v O Q O z O Q v Q z Q z aW "LL O wn z J J wU w W W() w C� J m U wO O ❑ -j aF- ❑O luj� _❑z m O ww �<l U ❑ O O w 1�' r IWI �Z w m w wO Er 4Fn ANIMAL CONTROL REPORT FOR: MAY, 2002 Steve Alexander, Jackie Misuraca and Moises Rodarte ANIMAL PICKUPS YEAR TO YEAR TO INCIDENTS YEAR TO YEAR TO DATE 02 DATE 01 HANDLED DATE 02 DATE 01 Doss Alive 39 158 190 Bite Reports 6 19 13 Dead 5 28 20 Animal Trap OTI 1 7 19 Set Ups 6 33 39 Cats Alive 36 109 80 Cruelty to Dead 9 33 32 Animals 1 2 5 OTI 0 0 0 Other Animals Alive 19 56 51 Dead 14 44 36 TOTAL ANIMALS Alive 94 323 321 Dead 28 105 88 OTI 1 7 19 TOTAL ANIMALS REMOVED 123 435 428 VIOLATIONS: Dogs at Large Noise Disturbance Defecation removal License Violation Other Monthly Total YEAR TO DATE No Owner 22 0 0 0 0 22 Warnings 2 0 0 0 0 2 Vicious Animal Restraining 1 2 0 Special Hour Patrols 5 Zoning Violations 4 Lost & Found 36 Animal Rescue 1 Outside Agency 0 City Reclaims 15 Other 31 TOTALS 106 Citations 23 1 2 31 1 58 83 9 186 13 38 6 11 160 176 5 6 0 0 58 53 100 75 398 416 TOTAL MONTHLY INCIDENTS HANDLED: MAY 02- 311 / MAY 01- 249 YEAR TO DATE INCIDENTS HANDLED MAY 02 - 1.111 1 MAY 01 -1.367 461 CIL' 3 CODE COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR, Max, 2002 May 02 YEAR TO DATE 02 YEAR TO DATE 01 ABATEMENTS: Nuisance Abatements Started 225 647 770 Weed Abatements Started 25 64 56 Vehicle Abatements Started 73 369 531 Dwelling Abatements Started 0 14 5 TOTAL STARTED 323 1,094 1,362 TOTAL COMPLETED 297 1,036 1,027 Case Follow-Uns 498 1,423 1,849 Home Occupation Inspections 10 40 45 Business License Inspections 0 0 13 Garage sale Permits Issued 155 634 632 N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H N N N 0 0 N O N N I0LnLn�� 00000Oo000 w U w U U w (n > > W W a'w N H Q U Q W U W W Z� U Z OQOf0 wZ0 W 2 U' H U Q <n Z >otSp(nF-(D w CD WEZ 0Z�UQZZJuw w-Ww 2<E zo H u Q U U w U U w j 0 > W JpOcnW VLL IOQQOwpzwO� B(n J2UC�ag12Uz 00VNC00�00 M0) CO l)LO M Ln CO M O N (O Ln N 0 d Ln — O N e- O ZO 0 00Nto M O O O O O O O O 0 0 _I0(D0(D(D(D(D0(0(D LM Lo Lp LM LM 0 LM lM LL LM �I N N N N N N N N N N .0000)O0)O0)tT0)0) N a+ 16 w N IQ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q n U U U U U U U U U U H IQ- H H H H FQ- FQ- H FQ- Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ - D D>> D n D D 0 D M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MIg:5 �gJ O U z0 m woo 0 (Q>w>-OU<Oz(n o00<-JJOOWOw IX W O= Q W W J W J �Q>QI- »QOfQ a2<2 w<QU(L0 O LnO Ln 0 Ln 0(D0 �O It 0) nCM Ln Nn0 I tM0M OD 0) N0� tb � � In �' f� I� In In 0 l!•) 1� U Z z Z Z O Q 2 C/) O U) o z 0z CL U _0 U w ly w wo Z0w Qw -J (V j Z W Q Z U Z J Z cu =g�wN�OZZULLJ -WCWZwF L Ogg w0UL°'nZUUOw Z cu J uui o EQEOYU)< oUmcW 10wz0zz0U�U) �QU¢0p O M M O O M O 0 In C N CO CO 00 Or- � a0 (0 00 Cl M M M CD m M 0 M m M 0000000000 461, DEPARTMENT REPORT: G�n1 OF TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: JERRY HERMAN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: JUNE 18, 2002 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MAY, 2002 Attached please find a copy of the Community Development Report which outlines the current cases processed by staff for the month of May. 464 PAMonthly Department Report.wpd 1 H Z W H Q IL W 0 z W a 0 W W 0 } H Z 0 V Z O H Q Z O H a N W N "a N a N "a N _0 N _0 J "a N -0 _0 _0 N _0 'D a E E E E E E E E E E E E E E =3 Z) 7 :3 Z) 7 7 D :3 7 :3 =3 > > N cM O O O M Ict M O r- O W ccv a cn L a U cn o m > D Li cn U + C: m cm Q +1 c o C) �, 0)E a� o CL a cn Q LO c 2 a Q c J o � d 2 � H � t E a a_' (n : E Q v C o N a) Q c E o ` c w 2 U o N a) U 0 O M + m U W 0 Q 46, U O O L C O o 0 +1 _0 �o a) c o }c- c a0U Q U 00 N (\ N Cfl 00 ()UU� a-UUC4 p (V a)p 00 U aUU I0_U o > a Q QQ O N N p p �--� N .— u �� m JUU Q0_U 0 Q a Q N O N r-� N CD^ ' uU WU _0c o CL a Q N .- ' U W o > Qo a Q a QQ O N p N --O Ln 6 � j � cr J(UU QaU a +L +, O co > cn L U U U O N _> a) -a O co - a cr a) 3 m 0 � O + O C i O COQ) 0 U U `- O U a) -p +I 0 4 a) O > O Q C O N U C � co U O c0 O +� i Q c` 0 a) 4- c a) cn 0 0 -a a) LS) +-, a) O O cn +, O O o 4 E U, C m M 00 +, > 07 L > d' (h m O c o a) c O �O L c � i o o U U •.F-- L3: +1 C a) 0 0 L C+ J M O X a) co C O CM C cn a) a) O (n CO a � � � (n a) 6 C ' � co +L, Q) � � � a) co C c + L (n j a) U > Q cn t � p <n L O +CL co O CIDco > �- co 4- FO Q a) oN (Y) N C o c :0 c > co ca) � Ja) rn O a) C"aOi7 O � > o p N O +JUvj O :0 � O C ~ > c 0Q Cn , `nO ) O-a C O O,L LO � M� co �a) x >+, O U%a) U o O c a) +' O "p O +, ) O ) E r, O E -O B U) `- O+� Cc cn O O N ? J O +' M a) C C ? v m - 7 O L C +' CD Cr =�� 0-O-0 CO a) 0a) � O QO d U C a) 0= `> 0 Q O CE U 2 a) Ir J +� L +� LL � � Q C OU J 42 _I . W W M z N a) C O U a) c O J O O 0 _0 J ENX JQO) L a) O w a) Cl) a)> c E w > aa))c c ^ n (J a) X o W Nt E M Q Q' O Q O n i U +Oc �00 CO (n NO O FU N O N M � ` 0 �O N M m O a N N d) c N d 0 a00 a �a 0 Oa- Y cco 0_U �-- (n U (n (n in (n C7 N (n (n F- H L070 b 0 x Q 0 a. a) N co C N C O N M C) co ULo �66 QaU C E a) � (a � a) O > Q O C- Q. CO QaQ N ' Q O N I MO N N (D �UU Qa.0 > O Q_ a N N p O 00 00 N �_ 0(D UU a.0 > O CL a N O 04 -- .- ins ()U 0_U a) >O Q Q N N C) 0 00 00 N ins° UU a_U x a)�+ a) + � L' c M+, +1 •0 C O `+�- a) O (OnQ E N O r L (O (O C O 0 O +- "O 00 — U) C a) C L 0 (� -p � O O C O � N CO > N C � O C a) cO a +, c U N MLO J cn O L U C_M a) � cn N +J L c0 O a) �� , c a` )) C M J O+ U Q a) O a c L — C_ O O O F CO a C O >" *� 0 aa) M .O +� 00 �- M cn a) M +� � a) U C C C r- U U a) O_ O O U M cO > O L C cn `'- "O a) C N O c0 O C C C� Q Q x0 O a) C N L ) m a) C: -p L 'p U x c0 C (� OL L O a) C a) v- 0 C c0 00 Y Q c0 ? a) LSD � 0 C cc � = (n C .} N LO U M cO I\ cO a) cO C Lo c (O W C cn O a C M a) " c) a) O C_ (1) Q C CO LL O c.+, O 00 C N Ntoao C O O U `- aC >Q +� a) (Y) M C , a) a)c j a O C N OJE C O _ U > L C O L C Q O (n c O w L-0 Cfl .O U O (n O C Q c (O -0 L +-' C Q) a) c C - (n Q N 'o > 'D C + a L a) a) 0 ° +- C O ° c 00 d O C.- CL c +) M U +- v7 O O i O L a) O O (fl c C) a) U) O M O �O N +' 4) �O a) U c O C a) �i- cO J _C > 4- (D C c0 x C +J cO C O L U) C a) > O U) O a) U O Q > O Q_ � a D C (n O Q Q O O CY (n a) C � � Q a) � C 4) N +�, O U O a) N U .� a) a) cn c a) a) O Q a) U CL a) (O CL Q: O 2 CC U O cm Q 0` U J Q U (n a a U C N U T U N 4 N a) M u) LO ON 00 O U M p M J CV O .Q a) N O o O O 00 O a. O N N N a)C14 n U O a N U p U) L O U Q c CL C7 c U Q_ (n M u7 o Ito o �� a) a) �0') N (o C N CA M U N O E O N p O L a) OO O N i O� O O O _r cV M o N N p� 0 oQo wC4� wO wr W N Cn = W NU NU ot Kai z O H U h a co ° L _o +o U Q a ai > O a` Q a O 0) LC) o aD > + UCLL O Q EE +, C U E � o C: C > �o > O a N 0 C4 Lid > O a N CO N LO N CO > O a N 00 N L � a 0 a) E o U o C O U - Q Q a Q Q a L a C -O U Lcm O C J O J O O co O }' CO C O O co w- -0 Y a) C a) a)C a) w- U U 4- O +� C O > L E> a)co L Q > a > a c O � a) E Q0 C c C t U) >, a Q Q�❑ i Q .J U)O Q 0•— O C co U a) L� U L� U U co — co `- �_ > a) U L 0 co C O W N LU a -O > °c'-°c a� EHU i L.- O O O a�U C C cn (0 o 4- O L C)� U M U U) a) co O `� U C O 0 -0 U U m •O Q a) > C > ❑ a) ?> J U C co cn C co L U E ' U � N co C > d `� a) O u a) > U O C 'L 4) U 0 O C c co "O L C C (o c G a C_ 4) i Q co Q a) i CL i co Q C L C > U 4- 3: O o O C C L N O U O U4-1 p� 0 > O +� cn a) -0 E U O co 4 n co +� CO U_ a) C L +' U � L a) L +� O U C co C O >' , N 0 co a) N 0 co a) O G co LL O }, co O m >a) .0 � Q_ ID � Q_ C C O + U N co > � U C � +� +1 +� � E LSD O i � Z3 -0 a) > a E U � ` C ` C V � L O +� U E O a) C a) U 4) N Q) O '( �O O 4O .0 �� C v- O C O U O C> a a � 'U U U ai O, � cn m a) � +— 0 L C O U U co o a) —_ ' c ai > o L o o i x a) aD C o +.j L- Q U U co "O Q (o � L L O d U c>o L ` C) a co U cn co fo _ +_+ M U -+ a) O O Q a) i a� O U- Q C E co c) �, L a) L co m co +�+ a� > o co +CL a, � -0 (B Q � p � L i E 0 a C (d > (n > :r— co J O U _ a) -00 cn w U Lwu L co +' O in cd C co +J O in d C co a) oC a) C O cn O C a) Q ❑ C L O 0 � 'O J E E 0 0 U C a 0 O -C o �- C a) r L- U ao a ` M a U O U C — +. p +' N +' (Y) V 'A v O cn Lc) ( cli QO to > co C N N a) O O co O a o O -- O O 0 LO NO O. o M (`) . N -J N L N N— n m 0- i CL m D_ U � U N M O a d C ❑ Ir ❑ O ❑ Q ❑� a �- I- �_ O H I— U)U U)U (n 0_ (n d V-) 41.3 a: V� L 00 LO LO N( U U a� O N -- C) N r-00 U U �C) O O N � O M N"-- �Lr) 00 U U aa� > O a a > O a a > O a a CD > O a a N N 0 N Lr) U U o_U N N 0 0-- -- 00 -- N U -i U a� N 00 N LO LO U o_ co ,C co N O > JCM 0 +L, Q U) m a- L U)U U) a) �O ` to L aco + U O 0 J O 4) C o -0 a> C "O a M U C 0) �, O 4 co >^ C U _ U O O O V U i C a a) 4 co m O C = . 0 +� a qt ^ .0 — -p a a) 0 co co a cn — O C O o C N C w(N a) M co C Q) E � co 1+- co U co U -2 00-0 C o U O U o O = i co _O E IL coS��o 0U ° o �, o U a� a) U)C >^ C U cn C0 O N O C 66 co cn O a) 7 o U� a) E p .0 } co N +L, m .0 m O N co N + a CO a) O O r L .� Q L cn 0 C 0 d C 6 C i 0) U S +� +' - m 1 N O O -0 0 O m CO "O 0 O a) C C L a) E 6 (n 0 CoaC O D +_� U L U to 0) co D C co a� co O E co +, a r p a a� E — 1-0 L 0 E a X U a) co 0 N U V C cv a) C N m L co O U p _ U 0+ }' CL Cl a 0 0 6 L O O .+- O +� U N co a *' O co LO to o U C CD o O U ' C a cn LO N U) a) cOi) cn �, +IU D cU >' _0-Eo ~ co cgoo L � o E E m N E E L 2i E a, 4- E �) cn L > c o co L v0i 0 U) CM +•� U a) 0 a) o U 0 li) -� U) o 0 C C Ln O > O C OU o O � L co `- 0 0 a)>> N M (� co '0 O CL M 4- �O U U 4O CL J a CC (j a CC 4- 0 O C U O .tf C co O -0 M n U 3: U _0 N c o (n U 0 0 CL a U a) Y co 0 E c a) E N 0 co co+ N O O C 0 M �� ca M M(n co o M(n M M 0 ^ co ' C L U p � ^ C- M N 'O N o N O N a o 0 O CO N 0 Lo ONTO- co NO 0 U 0 c 00-0 00 E 000 N co O O L m M O N O N O N N J L N+ N O O N U N a— O 0 0 a) CL 0 CL E a 0 0 L 0 D o a a U � 0 a 7— m ? O= Z) 0 0 a co a U N 0 (n U) CL O F— CC H U) 2 N w U (n V a: .— CO CO U CC J () Q� a) Q O .C: C 0 +' c oo U_ 0- 0- a N O � j N co U N O N Cm m O 2 cn L o L oQ a O L OL CL N N 00 ) (D N� co (, U CLU NCU O N -- O � � U co J U QCL � � > a) O > C. O CL a co Q N O N 00 N� Ln U U LZU (N O LO N cfl U _0 a) > O Q Q c6 N O N O �p LO N U (D c J U Qa- O O 0)4- C O _0 co x -0 (2) c o 0 a C c O m J CD(D +� +' L n- CL cif — C) C c m O 1 p O Q) cn C C O E cn 0 M V to L a) c a) > c O O cm D a) U E cn LU U cn ] co co d U fo U 0 C O co 0- 00 cn Co (o L U (Dm E co "C L c > N LO n- _ a) O O L o —� +' C o a) Q- O c U a) L C L 0 L 0 L 0 (°n - >a) O U n CcCo O a) O O >c cn LO U) O U C C cm a) C c Ufl � a) zo L mE CC C Oa0 cO OV) O C C O C C O 0 co CO C C C co 0)0 L Lo Q a) > U N a) L E-o Lr d c cn co +-� O `� � J � H > a) cn — cn O C �J co a)v) cn -C N 0 /N O 0 a > O +J o C� 0 U N CT) N J O CO 0 O •- O O O co ( _O O O + cB > -0 L O C,0V O � c a) �c C co �U N O C a) O a) O cn M O C Q a) > 0 +� L > co +` c L 0-L) o c 00- O O — 0 C• C a) c 0 o L + a 0 a) cn a) c ncu Q c m U Q- a a) U) > Q (1) m a) C 0� O .� Lu ai +' cr U) a o a) Q cn 0 m o (D J U) a Q c d C O U) a) a) � d `*- Q ) N 00 00 � cn d J c LL c) p � cn 0 �C E E cn a.) N � a) c) -0 c +1 N c N O Q L a) 1 + O a) cn a E a C _ + L U a) Q o 00 O u1 O M O O> LO >' r- mot• L � cl)� M M Lci 2 I- I— LO c LO 4- � U) N -C co LO 0O O N — N N N C O> rn O c O E .c p LU O O a 0 N> M M O d O? O M O 0-v Q 0 F— CL) O c Q Q f— �2 O U) (f) I— Li- a I— U) U) U) LL 2 LL F— _L cn 5 L` 47"00 " (" 7 M U O a � Q) L C J (n L O O a� +' O C a� cn o a) cn CO C N 0 L U � (B � 00 F, 0 a) a) a ca � U 0 cn �- o 0 W O W cn c— a) O m L C m a 0 a) CD 0 N L- Lo Lo fn Lfl N N O O (Y) 0 w F- CC 0 C. W C: F- Q I— F- U O C. LU Q U C- O p c LD dU CD L p p a) N j N N 4a a> CDa o N.01 �.Ol o 10-01 f U � a a) V CD O c 0 o o Ln o c o E ri �"� N M dp M s '- cco 0 o d s x � F- c c � a L N C O C O O a coo m m I m m C1 N W Q 3 N Of C C > +' O = O lCC p N Z C 10 V 0 a a o� i > N cnco O� G1 f0 C7 a �2 a Z a� as = C a «: O m O V C C s H lida� as C V O Z 10 U. C y ++ p C f0 C Vl w G C C y O IA 0 E Fes- 2 a U 0 I 471 Gi. JA a 0 a v a 0 Q 471 u3 DEPARTMENT REPORT: �o _ U _ 5 OFT1�ti TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY CgIL FROM: DODIE HORVITZ, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTO DATE: JUNE 18, 2002 SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MAY 2002 UPCOMING EVENTS OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 2002: July 1 *Free Energy Assistance July 1 *Rug Hooking Class July 1 *Monthly Putting Contest July 3 *Introduction to the Internet Class July 10 *Introduction to E-Mail Class July 5 *Patriot's Luncheon July 6 La Quinta Summer Tour, Desert Willow July 12 San Diego Zoo Excursion July 13 La Quinta Summer Golf Tour, Indian Springs Country Club July 16 *CPR Class July 17 *HEAP Program Outreach Clinic July 17 Drawing Lessons, Senior Center July 17 Guitar Classes, Senior Center July 16 Quick and Healthful Weeknight Meals, Senior Center June 16 *Free Hearing Consultations July 18 *Healthy Cooking Class July 18 Fabulous French Cooking Classes, Senior Center July 18 *Free Medicare and Insurance Counseling July 19 *Free HI -CAP Counseling July 20 Mastering Microsoft Access, Computer Seminar July 21 Family Excursion to Disney's California Adventure July 22 *Digital Photography Class July 22 La Quinta Summer Golf Tour, Landmark July 22 Mastering Microsoft Excel, Computer Workshop, Senior Center July 20 Beach Train Excursion, San Clemente Ocean Festival July 20 La Quinta Summer Golf Tour, Sun City Mountain Vista July 23 *AARP Mature Driving July 25 Tiny Tots Jamboree, La Quinta High School Dance Room July 27 La Quinta Summer Golf Tour, Landmark Golf Club July 29 Beginning Computers, Senior Center July 30 Fun Crafts for Kids, Senior Center July 30 Italian for Travelers, Senior Center July 31 Intermediate Computers, Senior Center July 24 *Earthquake Preparedness Seminar *Daytime Senior Center class or activity 47� 001 T4ht 4 a (P 0" Community Services Department Attendance Report for the Month of May 2002 Summary Sheet Program 2002 2001 Variance Sessions Per Month 2002 2001 Leisure Classes 255 28 227 16 2 Special Events 94 51 43 3 1 Adult Sports 588 456 132 17 11 Senior Center 1702 1349 353 103 84 Total 2639 1884 755 139 98 Senior Services Senior Center 526 477 49 12 13 Total 526 477 49 12 13 Sports Complex Use LQ Sports & Youth 6,500 6000 500 30 25 Total 6,500 6000 500 30 25 Total Programs 9,666 8,361 13041 181 136 Volunteer Hours Senior Center 1 8081 7531 55 Total Volunteer Hours 1 8081 753 55 Monthly Revenue Senior Center $ 3,853.50 $ 3,027.00 $ 826.00 Community Services $ 3,483.00 $ 4,452.00 $ (969.00) Total Revenue $ 7,336.50 $ 7,479.00 $ (143.00) Revenue Year to Date Senior Center $ 78,240.00 $ 55,987.50 $ 22,252.50 Community Services $ 65,137.00 $ 56,772.00 $ 8,365.00 Total Revenue to Date $143,377.00 $ 112,769.50 $ 30,617.50 474 Community Services Program Report for May 2002 NNW 2002 2001 2001 2002 2001 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Sessions Sessions Leisure Classes Beginning Computers 8 24 0 0 24 3 0 Hatha Yoga 20 160 14 28 132 8 2 Power Point Seminar 3 3 01 0 31 11 0 Italian for Travelers 171 681 01 0 681 41 0 Totals 481 2551 141 28 2271 16 1 2 2002 2002 2001 2001 2002 2001 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Sessions Sessions Special Events Catalina Island 25 25 0 0 25 1 0 Fashion Island 15 15 0 0 15 1 0 Mexico Excursion 54 54 51 51 3 1 1 Totals 941 941 511 511 431 31 1 2002 2002 2001 2001 2002 2001 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Sessions Sessions Adult Sports Open Gym Basketball 168 168 96 96 72 15 8 Adult Soccer League 140 420 120 360 60 2 3 Totals 308 588 216 456 132 17 11 Recreation Totals 4501 9371 2811 5351 4021 361 14 Page 2 4-7 !r, 3 Senior Center Attendance 2002 2002 egistere ota Registered Total Meetings artici ants a ici ation Participants Participation ariance 2002 2 1 Senior Activities ACBL Bridge 243 243 220 220 23 5 4 Ballroom Dance, Complimentary 6 6 0 0 6 1 0 Bridge, Duplicate/Social 382 382 279 279 103 13 10 Dog Training, Complirnentary 5 5 0 0 5 1 0 Ice Cream Social 21 21 40 40 -19 4 6 Knitting Guild Club 10 10 0 0 10 1 0 Monthly Birthday Party 31 31 29 29 2 1 1 Monthly Luncheon 97 97 84 84 13 1 1 Movie Time 71 71 71 71 0 10 10 Putting Contest 12 12 7 7 5 2 1 Seminars 15 15 0 0 15 1 0 Senior Activity Total 893 893 730 730 163 40 33 Senior Leisure Courses Ballroom Dance 15 36 21 35 1 3 4 Ceramics 11 42 11 48 -6 5 5 Computer 3 3 9 8 -5 1 2 Dog Training Class 23 27 7 24 3 3 4 Exercise 43 400 46 374 26 13 12 Senior Leisure Courses Total 95 508 94 489 19 25 27 Senior Leisure Classes Arts and Crafts 19 19 0 0 19 4 0 Bridge Lessons 68 68 0 0 68 5 0 Computer Tutor 1 1 5 5 -4 1 5 Creative Writing 14 14 0 0 14 51 0 Golden Tones 42 42 50 50 -8 31 4 Quilting 57 57 33 33 24 5 5 Rug Hooking 2 2 3 3 -1 1 1 Tai Chi 16 16 17 17 -1 4 5 Woodcarving 33 33 22 22 11 5 4 Yoga 49 49 0 0 49 5 0 Senior Leisure Classes Total 301 301 130 130 171 38 24 TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAMS 1,289 1,702 954 1,349 353 103 84 Senior Services A.A.R.P. "55 Alive" 26 26 50 50 -24 2 2 Ambassadors 67 67 62 62 5 n/a n/a Bono's Mobile Office 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 FIND Food Distribution 373 373 270 270 103 5 4 Health Screenings 10 10 26 26 -16 1 2 Hearing Consultation 2 2 7 7 -5 1 1 I.I.D. Energy Assistance 32 32 32 32 0 n/a n/a I.I.D. Energy Assistance/No fee 1 1 3 3 -2 n/a n/a Legal Consultation 8 8 12 12 -4 1 1 Medicare/Hi Cap Consultation 1 1 9 9 -8 n/a n/a Share Meetings/Sign-up 4 4 5 5 -1 1 2 TOTAL SENIOR SERVICES 526 526 477 477 49 12 13 SENIOR CENTER TOTAL 1,815 2,228 1,431 1,82s 402 115 Page 3 �, DEPARTMENT REPORT: a� `� c 4 CAM Of TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council n FROM: Roy F. Stephenson, P.E., Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: June 18, 2002 RE: Public Works/Engineering Department Report for the Month of May 2002 Attached please find the following: 1. Citizen Service Request Summary; 2. Encroachment Permit and Plan Check Services Summary; 3. Capital Improvement Plan Status Update; 4. Monthly Summary of Public Works Tasks. Roy F. tephenson, P.E. Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer 477 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020618Dept.wpd z W Q � y Z � Q J IL Cl o = �, z J Y � LL 00 I I- �� w VU J M m W � a w L) U O a H O a w w w O w w U w w H 0 O a w a w 0 w w w 7 0r ' H W m Z W 2 W U) 479 003 w Q a U) D Q F- N 'w W 'O 9 w d a Z O a N O O N O O N W J V y M U as U ° ++ o > +O+ U d O >. i a) *- > , O Os O C ++ 'O c O)'O as > C > C V N C C H U O C p C _ H : _ E- a) ca a) a) V Z > N E N ° C > U O C uj w ai y C O - vi C 0O C_ c 0 +L+ `O -p +U+ a) .� �� V to OOd co c c OfU C O o U (O c a 0 a3 p� t a) N " •p r� CD m 10 `� -0*- C c m c H O c U C y 0 W p - Q to 0 V p� *' fO co V C U C OO) o 'fl m N y E O Ch C — +p ° N d N C — a) f- U t O N C "" •ayi a°-� U m +, }a) y y H iL a) d O> m L U O Co rn ` ` .. cm X rn V C C y a E y +O+ y a) Y U+ U Cl) i1 a +? �+ ++ N E> C C N 0 C O C c a, �', 0 u V CO C d- O a U V c N C co a' E cp CD (Da-,p C O W a�Qoc U c°n in c; ai w v co O CD U 0) E- Ern c C O •L o f^° C DI — w C cm Q C) +O-' C N N N �`-V 0).t- .U. U +' +C+ C a3 � V 'a c •d C .O +0+ >. a 0 O as w a C.0 O C C c c0 N 7 c Ta ° a) >. U W > cis +� c +� .- O - c m Cl) d U N J U aC+ V O a) o +r a7 Q 0 O v- ~ O m O '~ N^ O O O U O.. O W ai J- H Y O O N a O m O LLJ U) C` ozf �, H +., � N 41 m a) r C 'U r U° N O r C C C ° @J U 7 4 O .0 O V C c`0 +`+ c0 +' C N U E 7 7 +O+ a�i 0 C c0 ++ 0 ++ a En e c c0 .o rn rn .- +• rn ++ m +J +J +J +, U c Cl) O>> E° c �Uwcna a) a) +_' C oocU a) 0 0 C O O O O a) 0 0 0 C U coU, �o U �UUHa �� U yr pUUHo`_ ° -0 N N N p N a) -- 00 O ' �C a.+ O O a -- O U) .-- 0 le O O d N O co O .— C\O b- ea 00 p rn a) H Cn N 00 N 0C° cM a° w o it r- C Q Cl LO qt a) ai N N mN O N U_ C 40. N 4* 4& C a) m CD in L C c AO co a 1` C M cO a W a� V W U m 0 asp o0 +, a mod) U Oa) ^ O ` C U a+J' aD a) ao Q 6 U=� i J� y N O C N C] d7 a U > ( O 4 U > >. +, ++ U > as n U a > 0 a) 0 a) U m m.m > U E dS O Un. 0 aaa O O 0 aka48 t- IT LL O W 0 EL 004 - d N � a� rn C Q C O O O O y o a co o 'N U a� 3 LO cn C- Co o 0 W O to c C ao - c cc •a a C t O +' y _ co t/i N _ � Y 0 co O O O y c n a p> 4 p '� c 3 C Y O .�,,a) 0 CM0 o3E E � c L Cp (n 0 7 c Co a) � Ln N C LO 0) H O C O> O U � O U O a. +, d t+ LO C E Lc: N 'o C L C. y0 0 0 O c C+ w U Co a) CV �' "cp U O Q, v CL r- O p V O .o +J c c c cco = y a 3 m 0 m o C N �LO as o .c � NF CD `- +0. - o a -a N � cM H�� wU +• p O H Cl 00 ff% 4)C �O � Q U OM V .0 a Uco a) Q E �N � Mo o U `= c C6 ° °v CO) - -v U)e7 C� 7 O 0 CCt/> 7 U O C 0 7 1O0 d O 7 a) ' O, N 7 Cai U) O( C 0c N-0 >cc+,0 O dt> MN Q O N U- O O •yVN W o a) •d CO E oy Oa 1 .` CV N 0 m O 0 m j O O -� � '(OD—wLr =~)o o -a m > Z a CL 5. coC0 ai CD C C> d +' l0 N C Q y 41 ++ O cm`J 0 O t+ M O +.F N o) 0 c� a) 0 7 H d� O a) O O t N O 0 0 0 y d O i y .O �� a) 6 t y +O' OUcnzw aUcocncr 0 o Ui 0 ODU-0U In C.) a) O OUa. 00 y w a Ov N N O N O N 00 N O M O N O M O N O r} 0 a1 Cn O n n O n LO N O � N N N O N O N O N O CY) O LO Lf) i in LO a N O O N N N O 0 �- O N0 M O N ^ 0 N Q to CY) O rn Z 4-0 U)0 O O O O 0 O o n M M M O N 0 W It N 0_ O M 0 U, 0) C) N �— LC) M � CoM CN N O N CD m a-- N O C) O CD CU C� C C O U ' +, C CD +CA C O U) •O C LU v— O O O Ca a q cOmQ o c0 n ff.O N c -•�Cn (a C)) M O L[)+' O J d +, — o a) -C v U +.. w m 0 0 s �� -�'0 3eCc > w °� IL Dina` aCn=0 �a)0 A Qma va Qcnrn `_°a 0 um H 0r) N M L O a n p > � v O c`o O O i ao O M Lc;00 a) a) (n O j E E m U U L O m m C c L +, }' -C o a-o v 0 w� o y U C ° C L +_ U- oa ) � o rn "' .- aoi C o ° U (D a� ci to U U C� - N J a " 0 m o O 7 C y o ^ O O U O U .N a) L W }' a� a a ciC� +, rn c Q E N LO O N 'O wa) c �E C C L E cD a) C' C ° 'n Q E +� aS E +� o +� o C +� a� a� > > a r a c 4— M r- � E o U U m O C� a) +, + ++ +J 0 0 C Q p 0 N N C O a) -a y L N L C, oCi C_ W., N to U N C O O O a C C > > � LU U O ir L Q U cm > a) C CM 'y O-0 (D C °� W U C E � i C a) (D O O O C_ C1 C_ W o 0 E U - LL O N U ] N N a) W ,� %+- O � O O •a C- c(a 0 } N �? >; Y LL C O E Q U� C L L O N L C O 0 0 co ,r- E Cu- L = co 'G N O "o Z a U tUA > Q) -= > a) "= O aD 0 �_ C C O C_ Y O CL C co 'a `0 V U C fCM C� C m C E C C E C C m (D > U) cm 0 CD CM CM a) O a c0 a) O N c n 0 CO CE N +' V1 ++ N O C > CD > a) oUm � v, w cm o Uw Q 0 0Urn a) o oU o aU CD N o'°'oo oU oU a -0 Ch N LA N C N N O C a) C C CD O �j O n 0 cn 0 0 N p p O CD CD ) to O O O N +CD 1 N N ' a ++ .a L +' In M O a) L O n 0 (O O L a) L n O +1 O +, O + C O N a) p MO N 0 N O N O •C •C N N O M O LO O N a) a) E ` E ` .� E •C cc O O 0 O +, 0 O N O c- O r- O N O O N +' O of CY) a) "a a "a a0 e- O N 0 N +, a) O O c- � Op ^ 00 00 00 Lp O N ch O co O ct O 00 O N It W (' O 1� N r� p O O Ln O cD c0 (O O p O O N •- M LO cM �} O m O N r•- 4* U> to U> C O 2 't O coY 4' +, ca (DN 7'a 0 ` 'a O -a a) U)N ` C C O 7 0 O ` U Q m N O -0Q L 7 co O U C OL O� O E O N O y O }' cn C O Lu o N 4- L- Q C m m O a c co o Q � a) O e- a U) a a aN LL =Ev I L 0. p :o �a � co � dE d `�'E cL�L'� _ maEi N Q Q a)— to Y aD� to t+� co a) +' >a Q i o� �e > t E C> O o HLZL>-- co a`-C CU O cd 0 a) c0 " .> O co N W U co p a LL fl. U a U a a a a (A a LO co i s = J E 8 a A W 0 0 0 A n a a. 0 U a_ H we ri o � c N O 7 O n CV) N O LL H O -a c ++ 03 M E -C'O N C ,a) Ucac°'� CL ci T d +1 H 3 C N4� O W- U +, O a 7 +r E Q �. o U w C N 0 +y, V m LM 4- m CN _ U C a2S — cm •� (D .� > c- n '� U a�i a)L -CD " a CD ++ 0U MONTHLY SLUMMARY OF P_UBUC WORKS TASKS Employee's .Hourly Labor Breakdown Month: April 28 Thru May 31, 2002 Crew #1 .Crew #2 .Crew.#.3 Maint.Mg. Activity 4 Men 4 Man 1Men 1 Man TOTAL. .Labor.Code 1000 Policing/Inspection 130 105 20 26 281 70 1001 Pot hole - Repairs/Patching 27 41 0 2 0 28'5 1006 OtherRaffic ContrQl l _275 0 0 1.008 Other. Concrete.Regairs/Constnaction 0 24 0 -24 1009 Street. Sign —.Install (New) 0 82 0 .0 2 97 1010 Street Signs — Repair/Maint. 38 52 5 62 1011 Debris Removal 5 50 13 7 0 0 0 22 1012 Right of Way Maintenance 9 1.021 .Clean.Catch.Basin.Inlets/Outlets 1 0 .6 0 7 3 1022 Rondo Channel outlet/Vault Repair/Maint. 3 0 0 0 6 1023 Retention Basins Repair/Maintenance 6 0 0 0 1 1024 Gutter/Median Sand Removal 0 1 0 0 l76 ] 025 Street Sweeping (Machine) 176 0 0 0 15 102.6 Street.S.weeping (Manually) 0 15 0 0 0 3 1.0.27 Sidewalk/Bike.Path.Cleaning 0 0 3 1031 Parks & Retention Basins Insp./Clean-up 0 0 8 1 9 39 1041 Mowing, Weeding, ShntbsJTree T,imtning 32 7 0 0 33 1051 Landscap anigation.Contract Management 0 0 -2-1 IZ 36 1052 Lighting/Electrical.Contract Management 0 0 9 27 1061 Small Tools Repair/Maint. 2 0 0 1 3 2 1062 Equipment Repair/Maint- 2 0 0 0 1063 Vehicle Repair /Maint. 9 4 0 0 .13 1081 Trash/Litter/Recyclable Removal 1082 Vandalism Repairs 1083 Graffiti Removal 1084 Maint_ Yard/Builslivg Repair/Maint_ 1086 Special.Events 1Q87 Emergency/Citizen.Complaints/Requests 1088 Meetings 1089 Office (Phones calls, paperwork, reports & Misc) SIJBTO_T_AL. 1091 Over Time 1094 Jury Duty.(Steve) 1095 Sick Leave 109.6 Vacation 10.97 .Holiday 1098 STD (Short Term Disability).(George) 1099 Bereavement Leave (Mark) SIJBTOLAL TOTAL HOURS TOTAL MILES 5 24 5 2 36 0 0 10 2 12 80 44 65 3 192 _1 0 4 20 _15 9 0 0 0 9 14 4 0 10 28 5 2 0 36 43 23 52.5 0 48 123.5 592 549 160 175 j476 13.5 23 0 0 36.5 64 0 0 0 64 48 12 8 8 76 40 14 24 9 87 .32 32 8 8 80 0 192 0 0 192 24 0 0 0 24 221.5 273 40 25 559.5 813.5 822 200 200 2,035.5 2,477 3,479 593 429 6,978 494 008 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 9 CITY OF LA Q UINTA POLICE DEPAR TMENT MONTHL Y REPOR T MAY 2002 • Traffic citations increase / Injury collisions down over March. • Misdemeanor assaults drop / Felony assaults show slight increase. • Calls for service show increase. • Special enforcement on -going on Hwy 1 I 1 corridor. City of La Quinta La Quinta Police Department Captain John Horton, Commanding May 2002 Highlights (Numbers in parenthesis denotes number of calls for service that day) Wednesday, 05-01-02 (44)• Petty Theft (from unlocked vehicle), at the 53000 block of Eisenhower, taken was change and a CD. T/C minor injuries @ Los Manos and Miles Ave, Primary collision factor marking an unsafe left -turn or U- turn Petty theft (from unlocked vehicle) at the 909 Sports Complex Thursday, 05-02-02 (57): Single car (non -injury) T/C @ Ave Bermuda s/o Calle Arroba, Richard Castillo, 23 yrs of Coachella lost control of his vehicle due to high rate of speed Primary collision factor unsafe speed 3 car Traffic collision at Washington and Eisenhower, minor cut and (1) complaint of pain, Primary collision factor unsafe speed HMJ, 16 yrs of Mt. Center, was arrested for shoplifting at Wal-Mart Nicholas Uwanawich, 36 yrs of DHS and Mark Marino, 22 yrs of 909, were arrested for Public intoxication at the 47000 block of Adams. Marino had to be OC'd to gain compliance while being uncooperative Friday, 05-03-02 (74): Jose Felix Juarez, 11/09/62, arrested for failure to registering as a sex offender at I I I and Jefferson Maria Alvidrez, 01/18/73 from Palm Springs was arrested for DUI T/C at Miles and Washington, property damage only Vandalism of whipped cream on (4) different vehicles in the area of 45-0180 Desert Air Saturday, 05-04-02 (54): Shoplift at Wal-Mart. Rosa Carmina Quintero De Vasquez (26yrs / of Coachella) was arrested. Dep. Nagles, Corporal Injury to Spouse at the 53000 block of Herrera. Jeff Costello (27yrs / of Chula Vista) pushed his estranges girlfriend, Dena Tamayo causing minor injuries. Dep. Hernandez Sunday, 05-05-02 (56): No Significant Activity. Monday, 05-06-02 (61): No Significant Activity m Tuesday, 05-07-02 (68): No Significant Activity Wednesday, 05-08-02 (69): Gonzalez, Jesus, 39 yrs of Indio was arrested for poss. of a controlled substance at Tampico and Bermudas Burglary (Locked Veh) @ 53-700 Ave Martinez, taken were 15 CD's, time of occurrence was from 2300 to 0700 hrs Smith, James Wesley, 04/03/47, arrested for willful harm or injury to a child Warrant. Thursday, 05-09-02 (76): Rachel Hernandez, 02/08/55 was arrested for attempt burglary at Wal-Mart Burglary (Resd) at the 55000 block of Firestone (PGA West), occurred between 0745 and 2100 hrs, taken was clothing/ domestic items and furniture, may be a civil problem, ID responded Friday, 05-10-02 (75): Isaias Sanchez, 19 yrs from Indio was arrested for under the influence of alcohol and failure to maintain a straight course of travel, after losing control of his veh. Westbound 52 west of Jefferson and striking the center divider hitting a tree destroying shrubs driving in the eastbound lane and crashing into a fence where he finally stopped after several hundred yards. Sanchez and his girlfriend were not hurt. Grand theft of a Forklift within a dirt field west of Jefferson and north of the All American Canal, south of Ave 52, occurred on 05/08/02 between 1500 and 1900 hrs, keys left in vehicle Check Fraud at 78-630 Hwy 111, victim was Stater Bros Saturday, 05-11-02 (60): Vandalism over four hundred dollars at PGA West golf course, a large veh drove onto the 10th and 1 Ith greens causing $2000 damage David Sharp, 08/20/83 from 907 and Catherine Carroll, 07/09/85 from DHS were arrested for Grand theft and petty theft with prior at Wal-Mart Vehicle theft at the 54000 block of Ave Obregon Spousal abuse (Mutual - Boyfriend/Girlfiiend) at the 79000 block of Ashley no prosecution (F/U) on Lewd acts with a child, suspect Miguel Ramos, 52 yrs; located by Imperial SO and transported to Indio to be interviewed by Inv. Nagels Sunday, 05-12-02 (52): Theft of $2,100 cash from hotel room at the La Quinta Resort Hotel NFI i Monday, 05-13-02 (47): Burglary at the 77000 block of Calle Colima, taken was a 15-ft. roll of carpet from the residence, which was under construction Throwing substances at a vehicle (rock) @ Fred Waring Dr and Washington (Bella Vista Homes) Tuesday, 05-14-02 (42): Thomas Michalski, 45 yrs was arrested for $160,000 in warrants @ Hwy 111 and Dune Palms Vandalism, attempt burglary (Veh) at the 54000 block of Ave Carranza, unknown suspect broke antenna of victim's veh. and attempted entry using it like a coat hanger Burglary (Resd.) and vehicle theft at the 78000 block of Ave Ultimo between 1345 and 1430 hrs, entry thru unlocked side door, taken were keys and wallet from bedroom while the victim was inside the residence Wednesday, 05-15-02 (44): Daryl Starkey, WFA, 32, La Quinta, arrested for felony embezzlement warrant She was recognized by La Quinta SET member Deputy Armstrong as she was entering Starbucks in La Quinta. Deputy Estrada responded to assist and verified warrant. She had been working at Sub Depot in La Quinta when she was suspected of taking in excess of $5,000. Burglary (Veh.) to three vehicles at the 54000 block of Ave Ramirez, taken were a stereo; amps; and speakers Thursday, 05-16-02 (54): Burglary (Veh.) at the 77000 block of Calle Sinaloa, taken was an alpine stereo, which was parked in front of the residence Lewd and obscene conduct at the La Quinta Fashion Bug, an HMA 30-40 yrs driving a mid 90's maroon/tan Ford Explorer drove up to (2) females and began masturbating partial Lic. #4ELG3 Battery on spouse at the 54000 block of Ave Mendoza, boyfriend slapped girlfriend on her face on 05/15/02. No prosecution desired Burglary (Veh.) at Family Heritage Church between 0845 and 1130 hrs, suspect(s) smashed a window and removed a purse and cell phone Burglary at Citrus CC maintenance shop between 0800 and 0630 hrs, taken was a red weed eater Burglary (Veh.) at the 54000 block of Ave. Martinez, La Quinta. No evidence of force possibly left unlocked. Vehicle belongs to Correctional Officer at prison and his SERT (Swat) team gear was taken including ballistic vest. No weapons. At about 2050 hours, the burglary prevention deputies responded to Lowes for a burglary just occurred. Deputy Reeves arrived on scene immediately and put out a suspect vehicle description. District team deputies were returning to the station when they observed the suspect vehicle. They followed until units were in position to make a felony stop. Contacted in the vehicle were Domingo, Leobardo, Victor and Jesus Cruz. 27, 25, 34 and 20 respectively. All the units did a great job and the teamwork by all the different teams were appreciated. The victim's purse was recovered in the vehicle, along with a small amount of narcotics, and items that may have been stolen from Home Depot in Rancho Mirage Friday, 05-17-02 (67): 0900 hours - Deputy Kane crashed at Motor School during a deceleration test. He has been transported to Loma Linda Medical Center with an unknown shoulder injury. W/C has been notified and arrangements will be made to pick-up Deputy Kane once his prognosis is known. Manuel Chavez Ibarra, 07/10/63, from Thermal was arrested for shoplifting at Wal-Mart Traffic Collision (DUI) at Miles and Adams, Primary collision factor making an unsafe turn or U-turn Saturday, 05-18-02 (40): Vandalism (Veh.) at the 78000 block of Bottlebrush victim's vehicle was keyed possibly by girlfriend's ex - boyfriend Single vehicle Injury T/C at Ave. 52 west of Jefferson. At about 0938 hrs. Peter Avila, 49 yrs., from La Quinta hit tree in center median. Avila transported to Desert Hospital with minor facial and internal injuries. Avila possible under the influence of a controlled substance, blood taken by Western Nurses. Lt. Donowho and Sgt. Ammons notified. LQ city public works responded to remove tree in roadway. DUI T/C at about 0958 hrs, SR I I I at Plaza in La Quinta. Santos Chicas, 33 yrs. from Indio struck vehicle in front of him causing a chain reaction T/C. No injuries. Chicas was a .27, .28 on pass device. Sunday, 05-19-02 (60): Burglary and vandalism (Veh.) while it was parked at Madison St. S/O Ave 58, broken driver's door window CD's taken, punctured tire; damaged to body of veh. Francisco Jerome Lopez, 08/25/80, arrested for battery on spouse at the 78000 block of Sagebrush. Lopez had pulled wife's hair; pushed her to the ground and then kicked her while she was on the ground Raul Cortez, 05/10/59 was arrested for public intoxication at the 51000 block of Ave Velasco. Cortez was also cited for 11.08.40 LQMC due to loud party Monday, 05-20-02 (66): High winds kicked in around 1200, numerous alarms in La Quinta area. Spousal abuse at the 78000 San Timoteo, 65-yr old husband pushed his intoxicated 63 yr old wife causing her to fall and strike her head on the tile floor. Wife was transported to JFK. Husband who had his hip replaced recently and uses a walker to get around will get an out of custody filing Burglary (Garage) at the 53000 block of Ave Velasco, occurred between 2200 and 0400 hrs, nothing taken or removed Spousal abuses at the 52000 block of Ave. Alvarado, boyfriend/ girlfriend physical Sat. night (05/18/02), suspect was GOA HM Petty theft at the 52000 block of Ave Cortez at 1000 hrs taken were (2) boxes and (1) purse containing purchase orders and sales receipts which were in the driveway next to her vehicle Carlos Andrade 18 years of Mecca was arrested for Embezzlement at Wal-Mart in La Quinta. Tuesday, 05-21-02 (53): Grand theft (Handgun) at the 54000 block of Ave Velasco, taken was a Glock 9 min during the last two months by victims grandson, Ramiro Diaz Jr., 08/30/78, UTL Grand theft (Unlocked Veh.) at the 44000 block of Verbena, taken was a cell phone and CD's Grand theft (Unlocked Veh) at the 79000 block of Violet Ct., between 1730 and 0920 hrs taken was $500.00 in cash and a Motorola cell phone Parolee Frank Santiago, 36 yrs. of La Quinta arrested for under the influence of a controlled substance after his mother reported that he was running around Dune Palms MHP acting bizarre, "giving people hugs." Santiago was very agitated and wanted to know why deputy's (3) were there to "gang up" on him. He then said that he didn't want any kind of trouble after seeing the Pepper ball gun and passively submitted to arrest. After arriving at the jail, he feigned severe stomach cramps, among other ailments and had to go to JFK for an Okay to Book. Wednesday, 05-22-02 (computers were down): Another Beer Run @ USA Gas (Dune Palms and Hwy 111) Petty theft (Unlocked Veh.) at the 78000 block of Estado (The Cleaning Connection) between 1700 and 0700 hrs. taken was a vehicle registration and (3) gas cards. Traffic collision at Desert Club and Ave La Fonda, driver T/C'd with block retaining wall, PCF making an unsafe left turn or U-turn Douglas Woodward, 30 yrs was taken for being mentally disabled at the Palm Royale CC, after he told a friend that he was going to kill himself next week by putting a gun to his head. Burglary (Veh.) at the 44000 block of Calico Cir, taken was an amp; speakers and sub woofers Traffic collision at Washington and Fred Waring, Primary collision factor failure to maintain a straight course of travel Vito Garcia from Indio was arrested for DUI while passed out behind his wheel in the no. #1 lane at Hwy I I I and Depot. Thursday, 05-23-02 (23): Nothing Significant to Report Uwe e Friday, 05-24-02 (69): SRO Deputy Morton working truancy sweep in La Quinta made contact at the 50000 block of Washington and arrested Steven Piru, 24, for parole warrant. Deputy Arredondo and Coleman responded to 79-651 Hwy. I I I reference a suspicious circ (squatters next to his property.) Officers responded to the 52000 block of Ave. Velasco for a report on willful harm or injury to a child Garcia, 14 yrs. was struck in the face several times by her intoxicated father, Isidro 43 yrs, after her 8-yr. Old brother fell in the street on his bike. No substantial injuries, however, the level of intoxication )( ) contributed to the violence which may have continued after deputies left. Garcia was booked for 273 (b 2 P.C. so CPS can get involved. Gregory Stephen Hathaway, 03/23/48 from Oregon was arrested for diving under the influence Saturday, 05-25-02 (57): James Christopher Yates, 08/31/67, from Manhattan Beach was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol, BAC was .13 % Grand theft (Unlocked Veh) at the 52000 block of Ave Villa, taken was a touch screen stereo and 12" speakers Mentally disabled, 16 yr. old Joe Dorsey from the 52000 block of Eisenhower Dr., La Quinta. Responded to a 601 incorrigible. Dorsey threatened to cause bodily harm both to himself and his mother. Petty theft (unlocked vehicle) at the 79000 block of Calle Palmeto, 03/09/53, taken was a cell phone and change Burglary (unlocked Veh.) parked in front of residence, taken was a bank card and a cell phone. Sam Ganton, was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol, BAC was .14% Isidro Ruiz, 43 yrs was arrested for public intoxication and willful harm or injury to a child Leobardo Mendez, 03/06/77 was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol, BAC was .095% ****DUI program on second night, no extra deputies signed up so it is Adams and Brewster with CSO Martinez for transport. 2 DUI arrests by Adams and i by Brewster on Friday night. Sunday, 05-26-02 (60): David Martinez, 04/20/77, was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol (Breath test at the JL was .23%) Burglary (Garage) at the 55000 block of Brae Burn in PGA, between 2200 and 0600 hrs someone removed the victims Galloway golf clubs totaling $2,800.00 Alex Osuna 41 yrs, from La Quinta was arrested for public intoxication 491 Raymond Welch 46, of La Quinta and George Jasso 50 of Mecca were arrested for public intoxication in front of La Quinta Liquor. At the time of the arrest Welch had a large amount of house keys in his possession as well as a broken Sears garage door opener and a mag flashlight in his vehicle. Tina Lugar, 02/21/49, of Byron, Ca., was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol at Madison and Airport; Pas BAC was .20% Monday, 05-27-02 (40): Debrah Baxter, 02/19/63, was arrested fordriving under the influence of alcohol, after a minor T/C at Washington and Hwy 111. Burglary at South -side of Ave 52 east of Madison between 1530 hrs and 0800 hrs. on 5/24 - 5/27. Suspect(s) cut lock on chain link gate and torched lock off a 10 X 30 metal storage container and removed a generator. Tuesday, 05-28-02 (51): Georgina H. Andrade, 08/24/73 from Indio was arrested for shoplifting at Wal-Mart Spousal abuse at the 46000 block of Dune Palms, Richard Alvarez, 03/30/83 of Indio forced his way into trailer and slapped his girlfriend, GOA, UTL. Linda Estelle, 39 yrs, Indio transient was arrested for public intoxication at Beer Hunter in La Quinta Vehicle theft at Home Depot parking lot between 1900 and 2030 hrs. Wednesday, 05-29-02 (56)• Complaint of pain traffic collision, Consuelo Jimenez, 29, from Palm Desert, was south bound in #2 lane approaching Channel Dr. The light changed and Wil Aufranc, 22, from Hemet, stopped in front of her. She was not able to stop and rear -ended him. She had complaint of pain and was transported to Desert Hospital. At 1500 she still had not gone to X-RAY. Vehicle vs shopping cart with 3 year in parking lot of Wal-Mart. 1230 hours deputies responded to unknown injuries ped vs vehicle. Upon arrival they found that a shopping cart had struck by a vehicle in the front of the store. The juvenile was knocked from the car to the asphalt. The driver, Ron Lavery, 63, Salton City, had already pulled out and was preparing to move forward when Gloria Brisueno, Coachella, was pushing a shopping cart with her 3 year old son, Alexis Serna inside. Alexis was standing up at the time. Brisueno was distracted and was looking in her purse for her keys, she did not see the car back up and she ran into the rear of it. Alexis was then thrown from the cart. He received a bump and contusion to the head. He was transported to JFK. (Follow-up) Received information that a stolen vehicle taken from a garage in La Quinta Q was recovered in Stockton. Arrested were Kevin Murrell, BMA 02/20/77, Palm Springs, Detavius Miller, BMA, 09/16/76, Palm Springs, and Eric Richter, WMA, 11/05/69, Palm Desert. Suspects charged with vehicle theft, receiving stolen property and forgery by San Joaquin Sheriff Dept. They all had false ID with them. CVNTF and SIB served two warrants today. One of the warrants was in La Quinta at the Aventive apts. They made several arrests. Thursday, 05-30-02 (46): At approximately 0147 hrs. while still in uniform on his way home, Deputy Yocom observed (2) HMA's on Bridgette Way. The males could not provide a reason for being in the area, so Deputy Yocom requested a 909 unit to respond to his location. When the subjects heard Deputy Yocom call for assistance they fled on 492 foot from the area. As Deputy Yocom was chasing one subject eastbound the other subject drove away in Deputy Yocom's SUV, containing all his EST equipment. Deputy Yocom notified responding units that his stolen vehicle was eastbound on Miles Ave. Deputy Adams who was working La Quinta (Burglary extra duty) observed Deputy Yocom's vehicle eastbound on Miles Ave. A felony vehicle stop was conducted @ Miles and Jefferson and Juan Carlos Mange, 06/04/78, from the 45000 block of Ash St., Indio was arrested for vehicle theft. While checking the Bridgette Way area for the 2nd HMA Deputy Garcia observed a loaded sawed-off rifle in the rear seat of a vehicle parked at the 45000 block of Bridgette Way. Oscar Gabriel Romero, 25 yrs, from the 54000 block of Ave. Ramirez was arrested for carrying a loaded firearm While at the 45000 block of Bridgette Way residence with 10 males and 2 females, Deputy Yocom noticed an HMA looking through the front window of the residence to what was going on in the front yard, Deputy Yocon identified the subject as the 2nd male who had ran from him and jumped the fence of another residence. Joe Amador Jr., 21 yrs, from the 45000 block of Bridgette Way was arrested for resisting arrest. While responding to assist Deputy Yocom, Deputy McFadden became involved in a single car T/C with his patrol unit at the Round -About on Jefferson in La Quinta. McFadden's unit sustained flat tires to the left rear and front right tires, also observed was fluid leaking and bent metal from underneath the unit. Mentally disabled person at the 79000 block of Paseo Del Rey, Brandon Moreno, 03/28/87, made verbal death threats to his father via friends; subject was GOA, UTL Grand theft at the 44000 block of Calle Santa Barbara, taken was a Nikon camera; silver necklace w/cross; black and Decker drill and $400.00 cash taken from residence. Jesus Hurtado, 03/23/68 was arrested for shoplifting at Wal-Mart Found property - Smith and Wesson .38 Cal Special, was located in the backyard at the 45000 block of Bridgette Way. (The same area where the vehicle theft and resisting arrest suspects fled from Dep. Yocom earlier in the morning.) Deputy Coleman responded to the 79000 block of Independence, the new Montecito track at Jefferson and Miles, for a burglary in progress. The owner, Chad Shupp 30 yrs, arrived at his residence to start moving in. As he entered the front door, he discovered someone was in the residence. He struggled with the suspect as he tried to flee, and received a possible broken nose. The area was searched extensively; Palm desert K-9 was contacted and assisted in the search of the residence in the construction area. During the investigation, the suspect's vehicle was located in the garage with the stolen property still in the vehicle. registration showed the r/o to be a Johnny Ortiz of Moreno Valley. I requested Mo Val to go by the residence and try to identify who had the vehicle. A check found the subject had moved. No local contacts were found. Deputy Coleman was instructed to impound the vehicle after processing it so that investigations might follow up any leads in the morning. The property was released to the owner. Extra patrol was requested for W-1. The vehicle was a Blue Ford Explorer 3RXS537. The suspects were described as being: S-I HMA 40's 6' 210 heavy set with glasses. S-2 57" medium build 20's possible with the first name of Ricky. The suspect/s are probably construction workers at the track, as the victims were just burglarized a few weeks prior for the appliances. Friday. 05-31-02 (79): Nicole Leanne Smith, 09/01/81, and her sister Erin Courtney Smith, were arrested for shoplifting at Wal- Mart Beer run at USA Gas, HMA, GOA, UTL 493 At about 2245 hours deputies located a party in the Rancho Ocotillo tract, the party +I 29 iVAII swing with several juveniles and open containers. Deputies contacted the adult resident, Chris'tnft1do 20,yrs,; and cited him for the LQ ordinance. Prado's parents were out of town and there were 1(M plus partygoers. Deputies stayed in the area, and caught several violators. (Follow Up) Peter Avila was arrested for vehicle theft from La Quinta when he ran out of gas at Fastrip and was caught pushing the stolen vehicle Tote calls for service: 1700 r ES VI CITY of LA QUINTA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT May 2002* SCHOOL: LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL Deputy Stephen Morton HIGHLIGHTS: • Eight students were arrested and cited for truancy violations. • Six arrests were enrolled into the Youth Accountability Program. • Participated in a valley wide truancy sweep. Four La Quinta High School students were found in violation and a parolee at large was arrested. • An anonymous report of drug activity led to the arrest of one student and the confiscation of marijuana. The student was arrested and suspended from school. • Along with the District Attorney's Office and the Probation Office, conducted home visits reference truant students and participants in the Youth Accountability Program. • Conducted follow-up investigations on reports from patrol Deputies. • Counseled students that violated school rules, which were not violations of state law, but serious enough to warrant discussing the incident as a preventative measure. • Assisted the school staff with several incidents of medical aids, inappropriate behavior and comments made by one student to another. • I conducted investigations and documented incidents that occurred on or off campus, to the school bus, which ranged from fights, possible sexual battery, vandalism, and truancy. Actual reporting period covers April 29, 2001 through May 24, 2002. 495 CITY of LA QU I NTA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT May 2002* SCHOOL: LA QUINTA MIDDLE SCHOOL Deputy: Robert Brooker RSO Grant Funded Position School Session: April in , 2002 thrvugn may 0-1 , Iuuc. HIGHLIGHTS: • I assisted the school staff in meetings with the parents of students who are at risk of being referred to the Student Attendance Review Board, due to attendance problems. • I assisted the school staff with several incidents of medical aids, inappropriate behavior, and name-calling, which is an ongoing problem. • Counseled students that violated school rules, but were not violations of state law. • Conducted follow-up investigations on reported runaway juveniles. One of which, has been missing over 14 days and required written notice to the School District, a check with the Coroner's Office and photos and dental x-rays be sent to DOJ in Sacramento Ca. • I conducted investigations and documented incidents of battery on a school grounds, lost property, suspicious circumstances surrounding a teacher at the school stemming from an anonymous phone call, and another suspicious circumstances surrounding a student because of a phone call from an anonymous parent. • I coordinated, supervised and participated in a district wide truancy sweep. The sweep utilized School Resource Officers in Palm Desert, La Quinta and Indio, along with the Coachella Valley Gang Task Force, Probations Officers from the Youth Accountability Teams (YAT) and DSUSD Security Agents. The truancy sweep produced 30 contacts with students, that some action was taken, 29 of which resulted in citations for truancy. i a Violations LA QUINTA POLICE MOTORCYCLE ACTIVITY REPORT PROGRAM STATISTICS MAY 2002 Prepared By: Deputy Dave Adams 35 Lane Change Violation Tows Fail to Yield Seat Belt Violations Injury T/C Turning Violations DUI Arrests © Non -Injury T/C 10 Stop Sign Violations Cut Traffic for Citation 47 Suspended DL Signal Light Violations ® Cut Traffic for Collision © Non -Moving 27 hild Seat Violations 1 2 1 Warnings L 32 HIGHLIGHTS 050302 - DUI T/C at Miles and Washington St. PCF 23152(a/b) VC and 22107 VC. 051002 - 2 Misd. Warrants served. 051202 - Non -injury T/C at Jefferson n/of Miles. PCF 22107 VC. 051502 - CPR & First Aid class. 051602 - Private property T/C. 051702 - Non -injury T/C at 111 w/of Washington St. PCF 22350 VC. 051702 - DUI T/C at Adams St. x Miles Ave. PCF 21801(a) VC. DUI driver not at fault. 051802 - Non -injury T/C at Simon Dr. @ Washington St.. PCF 21802(a) VC. 051802 - Non -injury T/C at Miles Ave. and Washington St. PCF 22107 VC. 052302 - Non -injury T/C at Hwy 111 and Plaza La Quinta. PCF 22350 VC. 052602 - DUI (Non -injury) T/C at Ave. 52 and Washington St. PCF 23152(a/b) VC & 22107 VC. 052602 - 20002(a) VC possible DUI rollover T/C at Ave. 58 a/of Jefferson St. PCF 22107 VC. 497 La Quinta Police Department Special Enforcement Team Monthly Report May 2002 Dep. Matthew Jimenez/Det. Aaron tneri�gi. Amrrwna1uCN m, 11---u The following is a summary of the Special Enforcement Team activities for the month of May. ***************************************************************************************************** Ongoing Investigations Parole Searches Vehicle checks Investigation assists Arrest Warrants Attempted Pedestrian Checks Bar Checks Follow-ups Meetings Citations issued Property Checks Bicycle Time Illegal Drugs Seized Total Mileage:170 miles 2 Probation Searches 4 0 Arrests/ Filings 3 5 Business Contacts 4 3 Arrest Warrants Served 2 3 Programs 2 g Crime Prevention Hours 6 0 Back-ups 4 17 Search Warrants 0 1 Recovered Stolen Property 3 0 surveillance's 5 6 Civil Commitments 0 0 Training Hours 4 0 Noteworthy Accomplishments: - The La Quinta SET began a surveillance program in the PGA West community to combat the problem of golf club theft in that area. Interview with one burglary suspect led to the closure of three burglary cases and to information on a homicide. 498 Riverside County Sheriff's Department EXPLORER POST 503 PROGRAM REPORT MAY 2002 Regular training meetings were held on May 7, 14, 21, and 28. The training meetings covered the following topics: 1) Felony stop instruction and practice, 2) Building search instruction and practice, 3) Physical training, 4) Tug-of-war practice, 5) Driving under the influence instruction and practice, 6) Crime scene searches and practical exercise, and 7) Ten and 11 code test. Deputy Manny Alvarado and I did the felony stop instruction and practice. Retired Deputy Luis Bautista coordinated the building search, crime scene, and practical exercises. I led the physical training. Jennifer Richards and I handled the tug-of-war training. Deputy Tim Leary did the Driving under the influence instruction and practice. Explorer Post 503 Captain Andres Martinez handled the 10 and 11 code test. Some Explorer Post 503 Explorers volunteered time to assist with making Riverside County Sheriffs Department Indio Station employee identification cards on May 21. Upcoming events for Explorer Post 503 Explorers include the Explorer National Competition, July 8-13, 2002, and the Riverside County Sheriffs Department Explorer Academy, August 11-17, 2002. Explorer Post 503 Explorers are working on getting in shape for the two above described outings. 499 CITY OF LA Q UINTA CRIME STATISTICS SUMMARY APRIL 2002 500 CITY OF LA QUINTA APRIL CRIME COMPARISONS CRIME APRIL 2002 APRIL 2001 YTD (02) YTD (01) *HOMICIDE 0 0 0 1 *RAPE 2 2 4 5 SEX CRIMES (FEL) 2 0 3 0 SEX CRIMES MISD 2 0 6 3 ROBBERY 2 0 8 2 ASSAULT (FEL) 14 13 47 34 ASSAULT (MIS 16 12 64 69 BURGLARY 56 43 213 194 *VEHICLE THEFT 13 7 50 28 *THEFT (FEL) 21 22 106 87 THEFT MISD 55 39 205 145 VANDALISM MISD 29 27 104 100 DOM. VIOLENCE 15 10 51 52 NARCOTICS 8 13 37 46 DUI 9 11 42 33 T/C NON -INJURY 59 43 223 177 T/C INJURY 12 6 28 16 T/C FATAL 0 0 0 2 TRAFFIC CITATIONS 457 354 1446 1383 * STATISTICS INCLUDE ATTEMPTS 501 N � O O N N w w Q Q I I I I N I I N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I M I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CM I I I I I I I I I I MI I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O I I I I I N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I w F- tz w F- w 0 w D m J Q Q w m m U w w 9 w 0 U_ i O O� (0 LO dO' M N O O 502 z w ry d w 0 Q O O J_ FY Q z O U) Q a_ 5 0 U w 2 cr- H Q 0 N� Q L w x D m LL J a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO o LO 0 LO N N T- r' w a. 503 z w ry a w 0 w 0 J N O � N w� J �M =� W I. - Q Z O m ry U) 0 w 2E r} U g m m �o �' v H N LL W O W 2� H 0 N I-n.1 N '- O O N N 0� w Q Q ■a I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I �1 I I I �i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r / I MI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I O I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O I I I I I I I I I I I I I MI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I W UyI I I � tT I I I I I I N N It-O Ir— cr- w 0 w 0 w J U w J w 0 J 0 0 2 U U Q w 0 U J Q Z w 0 00 Ix ' ^ /Y C) 505 F- z w a a w 0 w U J 0 Q J N O CN J_ L.L U_ U) CJ 0 LL J Q U LL O Z O U) G O U N T- O O N N Q Q 0 0 0 0 0 o � o LO N � � F— O C) z N N T- O O N N 0 0 f` CO 0 mot' M N V- O 507 F- z w ry a w 0 W 0 J O O J_ FY Q U Q U LL LL Q 0 z 0 U) Q 0 U N v- O O N N Q Q J Q Q O O O O O O O O O O O LO d' CM N V- z p z z z U H U) z O Q U LL LL H 508 CITY OF LA QUINTA DISPATCH INFORMATION / APRIL 2002 TYPE OF CALL RESPONSE TIME MINUTES NUMBER OF INCIDENTS EMERGENCY 4.7 1 ROUTINE 9 1021 *STATS TAKEN FROM RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF DATA WAREHOUSE RESPONSE TIME REPORT 5n() TWit 4 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 Continued Public Hearing to Certify a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-418 and Zone Change 2001-100 to Change the Zoning Designation to Low Density Residential Within the Sphere of Influence of the City of La Quinta for Subsequent Annexation for Approximately 200 Acres, Bounded on the North by Avenue 52, on the East by Monroe Street, on the South by Avenue 53, and East of the Existing City Limits. Applicant: NRI, La Quinta Limited Partnership RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: / 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-418; and 2. Move to take up Ordinance No. by title and number only and waive further reading. Move to introduce Ordinance No. on first reading for Zone Change 2001-100. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: On June 26, 2001, staff prepared a report to the Planning Commission (Attachment 1) recommending the annexation of 240 acres located between Avenue 52, Avenue 53, Monroe Street and the eastern City limits. During public testimony Ms. Waters, property owner of the 40-acre parcel located at the northwest corner of Avenue 53 P:\Jerry\CC DesertAnnex. w pd 5Io and Monroe Street where she currently operates a grape vineyard, requested her property be removed from the annexation. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the annexation with the exclusion of 40 acres belonging to Ms. Waters. The project was scheduled for the City Council meeting of July 3, 2001. A staff report was prepared, however the project was continued without public testimony at the request of the applicant. It was subsequently continued numerous times at the request of the applicant. At the Council meeting of November 20, 2001, public testimony was taken with the matter again continued at the request of the applicant (Attachment 2). Staff modified the Environmental Assessment ) ("EA") to address the concerns of Mr. Hargreaves (attorney for Ms. Waters) and renoticed the public hearing excluding Ms. Waters' property. The public hearing notice provided a new 20-day review period for the revised EA. The remaining 200 acres requested to be annexed, are currently located outside the City limits, but within the City's Sphere of Influence and located generally at the southwest corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 52. Project Request The zoning designations proposed by the applicant are for Low Density Residential development. The requested zoning designations are compatible with the surrounding development in the area which is characterized by single family residences around golf course development. Ms. Waters has specifically indicated that she will continue her grape operation. Under the City's current zoning regulations, the property, once annexed, would be allowed to continue its operation forever or until the current, or future property owner chooses to discontinue the activity. In addition, Ms. Waters' attorney, Mr. Robert W. Hargreaves of Best Best & Krieger, raised issues regarding the Environmental Assessment (Attachment 2). Public Notice The applications were re -advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on May 29, 2002. All property owners within 500 feet of the site were mailed a copy of the public hearing notice as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the La Quinta Municipal Code. To date, no comments have been received. Public Agency Review All written comments received are on file with the Community Development Department. P:\Jerry\CCDesertAnnex.wpd Conclusion The proposed Pre -annexation Zone Change is consistent with General Plan goals, policies and programs for a varied housing stock. A condition has been added to the Ordinance requiring the applicant to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City") from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Zone Change. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council Certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-418; and Move to take up Ordinance No. by title and number only and waive further reading. Move to introduce Ordinance No. _ on first reading; or 2. Do not adopt Resolutions of the City Council certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-418 and approving Zone Change 2001-100; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Hermon munity Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Planning Commission minutes for June 26, 2001 2. City Council minutes of November 20, 2001 3. Letters from Robert Hargreaves, Best Best & Krieger, dated June 26, 2001 and July 3, 2001. PAJerry\CCDesertAnnex.wpd RESOLUTION 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-418 PREPARED FOR ZONE CHANGE 2001-100, AND ANNEXATION, ESTABLISHING PRE -ANNEXATION DESIGNATIONS FOR 200 ACRES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-418 APPLICANT: NRI, LA QUINTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP COUNTRY CLUB OF THE DESERT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 3rd day of July, 2001, continued to the 17th day of July, 2001, 7th day of August, 2001, 18th day of September, 2001, 20th day of November, 2001, 18th day of December, 2001, 19th day of February, 2002, 21 st day of May, 2002 and renoticed for the 18th day of June 2002, to hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2001-418 for Zone Change 2001-100, and annexation, for the property generally located at the southwest corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 52, more particularly described as follows: APN 767-200-002, 003, 004, 005, 007, 008, 009, AND 010 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 26th day of June, 2001 hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2001-418 for General Plan Amendment 2001-077, Zone Change 2001-100, and annexation, for the property generally located at the southwest corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 52 WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study (EA 2001-418) and has determined that although the proposed Zone Change 2001-100 could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because appropriate mitigation measures were made a part of the assessment and included in the conditions of approval and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify certifying said Environmental Assessment: 51� 01 ` P:\Jerry\CCDesCC ResoEA418. wpd City Council Resolution 2002-_ Environmental Assessment 2001-418 NRI, La Quinta Limited Partnership - Country Club of the Desert Adopted: June18, 2002 1 . The proposed Zone Change will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2001-418. 2. The proposed Zone Change will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 4. The proposed Zone Change do not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. 5. The proposed Zone Change will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. 6. The proposed Zone Change will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 8. The City Council has considered Environmental Assessment 2001-418 and the Environmental Assessment reflects the independent judgement of the City. 9. The City has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 514 r P:\Jerry\CCDesCCResoEA418.wpd U�;J City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-418 NRI, La Quinta Limited Partnership - Country Club of the Desert Adopted: June18, 2002 10. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitutes the findings of the City Council for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby certify Environmental Assessment 2001-418 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum attached hereto and on file in the Community Development Department. 3. That Environmental Assessment 2001-418 reflects the independent judgement of the City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 18th day of June, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC/AAE City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 515' P:\Jerry\CCDesCC ResoEA418.wpd duo City Council Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2001-418 NRI, La Quinta Limited Partnership - Country Club of the Desert Adopted: June18, 2002 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 516. 0�'7 P:\Jerry\CCDesCCResoEA418.wpd 2. 3 9 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM, EA 2001-418 SECOND REVISION MAY, 2002 Project Title: General Plan Amendment 2001-077, Zone Change 2001-100, Pre -Annexation land use designation and zoning Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Contact Person and Phone Number: Jerry Herman, 760-777-7125 Project Location: Southwest corner of Avenue 52 and Monroe 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: NRI/LQLP 81-100 Avenue 53 La Quinta, CA 92253 6. General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential with Agricultural Overlay 7. Zoning: Proposed: Low Density/Agricultural-Equestrian Residential District 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Revised environmental assessment for a Zone Change to assign zoning designations to a total of 200 acres as part of an annexation application to the City of La Quinta. The original environmental assessment assessed a project area which included a total of 240 acres. The parcel located at the northwest corner of Avenue 53 and Monroe was removed from the proposed annexation boundary, at the owners' request and the direction of the Planning Commission. The proposed designation is Low Density Residential. The County General Plan designation is 3A, 0.4-2 units per acre and 313, Residential, 0.2 to 0.4 units per acre. Previously, this annexation application included a General Plan Amendment. Since that time, the City has adopted a new General Plan and associated land use map, which includes the subject property. The General Plan Amendment has become moot. 51'7 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesEACkIst.WPD, 1 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the projects surroundings. North: Developed polo grounds South: Approved golf and low density residential development, Country Club of the Desert West: Approved golf and low density residential development, Country Club of the Desert East: Vacant desert lands and agriculture 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Local Agency Formation Commission G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesEACkIst.WPD i 2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology and Soils Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. May 28, 2002 Date B1 u 101 519 �j l G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesEACkIst.WPD 3 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project - specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off - site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The analysis of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance 520 011. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesEACkIst.WPD 4 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: AESTHETICS: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (General Plan Exhibit CIR-5) b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (General Plan EIR, page 5-12 ff.) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials) AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Dept. Of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29, 5-32) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (Aerial photographs) III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact X X X X X K4 X X X 9 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesEACkIst.WPD r) 5 v ul 2 d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Project Description) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Project Description) IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment, Exhibit 5-1) b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) c) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) Either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 5-2 ff.) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (La Quinta Municipal Code; General Plan) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-5) V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-77 ff.) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resources (i.e., an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-77 ff.) G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesEACkIst.WPD X X X X X X W VII. c) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? (Lakebed Delineation Map) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-77 ff.) GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.2-3, page 4-35) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (General Plan EIR, page 4- 30 ff.) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) iv) Landslides? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) c) Be located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-32) HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Riverside County Office of the Agricultural Commissioner materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Riverside County Office of the Agricultural Commissioner materials) c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Application Materials) G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesEACkIst.WPD MMME mmmm_ Omni MMME MMME M�M= ==ME Omni MEMO NEON X X 1XI 528 �� 14 d) Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Riverside County Hazardous Materials Listing) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip; would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 6-1 1) h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildlands fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) Vill. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY : Would the project: a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-26, 6-27) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (General Plan EIR, page 4-57 ff.) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR, page 4- 30 ff.) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on - or off -site? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems to control? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) f) Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-13) g) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment 6-13) MEMO MOEN Omni MEMO NEON MEMO 524 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesEACkIst.WPD C 13 a IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Project Description) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purposes of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Master Environmental Assessment 2-1 1) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-5) X. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment 5-29) XI. NOISE: Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (General Plan EIR, page 4-157 ff.) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (General Plan EIR, page 4-157 ff.) c) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan EIR, page 4-157 ff.) d) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Master Environmental Assessment) e) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive levels? (General Plan map) XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) ? (General Plan, page 2-14) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesEACkIst.WPD 91 X X X X X X X R ri 525 C. o c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application X Materials) XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff. ) Police protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff. ) Schools? (General Plan MEA, page 4-9 ff. ) Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks Master Plan) XIV. RECREATION: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application Materials) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application Materials) XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff.) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff.) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff.) d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (General Plan EIR, page 4-126 ff.) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Application Materials) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Application Materials) NONE MMEN NONE MEMO MEMO MMME ==ME G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesEACkIst.WPD 10 526 17 g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Application Materials) XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, pg. 4-24 ) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24 ) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, page 4-27) d) Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, page 4- 20) e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, page 4-20) f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (General Plan MEA, page 4-28) XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesEACkIst.WPD 11 MEN MEMO NONE NONE NONE MOEN MEMO X X X 527 k" 13 XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSIS. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. The EIR for Country Club of the Desert (SCH #99061 109) was used in the preparation of this checklist and addendum. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. See attached Addendum. SOURCES: Master Environmental Assessment, City of La Quinta General Plan 1992. SCAQMD CEQA Handbook. General Plan, City of La Quinta, 1992. City of La Quinta Municipal Code Draft and Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 99061 109, Country Club of the Desert, August 2000. Country Club of the Desert Traffic Impact Analysis, Urban Crossroads, October, 2001 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesEACkIst.WPD 12 528 �f13 SECOND REVISION, ADDENDUM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-418 MAY 27, 2002 I. d) The proposed annexation will not result in an increase in light or glare in and of itself. Buildout of the parcel, however, -will generate light, since the proposed project will occur on a currently vacant parcel. The land use designation to be placed on the parcel will result in low density residential units, which generate low levels of light. The project will be required to meet the City's standards for outdoor lighting, which will ensure that lighting is directed downward and contained within the site. Compliance with these standards will reduce the potential impacts of light and glare to a less than significant level. II. a) &c) Approximately 75 acres of the 200 acres in the annexation area have been in agriculture for some time, primarily as sod farming. The Waters property, consisting of 40 acres immediately south and east of the annexation area is being farmed currently, and produces table grapes and dates. Annexation of the 200 acres, and the imposition of land use designations, will not in and of itself impact the agricultural use of the annexation area. In the long term, however, the annexation area will likely be developed in low density residential land uses. Currently there are two parcels (769-200-002 & 003), totaling 40 acres, which are under the Williamson Act contract. This acreage is included in the 75 acres currently in agriculture within the annexation area. The applicant previously filed a Notice of Non -renewal for these parcels. The loss of 75 acres of land currently in sod farming within the annexation area will not represent a significant loss of prime agricultural land in the Valley. The sod farming and pasture lands which occur in the annexation area do not represent a significant portion of those lands in that use in the Coachella Valley. Data from the County of Riverside shows that land in agriculture in Riverside County has substantially increased in production in the last twenty years. Under the revised project, the 40 acre parcel located at the northwest corner of Avenue 53 and Monroe, which had been included in the original assessment, but has been removed at the request of the property owner and Planning Commission, can continue as an agricultural land use without interruption under the County's jurisdiction. Furthermore, with annexation of the 200 acres, the City's General Plan land use designation will include its Agricultural Overlay. This overlay would allow the start of new farming operations, or the maintenance of existing operations on J 2 all 200 acres, in addition to allowing residential land uses. Ln �0 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesAdd2.WPD Acreage in production of table grapes in Riverside County increased 146% from 1979 to 1999, from 9,496 acres in 1979 to 13,829 acres in 1999 (please see attached statistics). Should the Waters property, southeast of the annexation area property, be converted to residential land use by the land owner, the loss of land for agriculture would not be significant, given the increase in production which has occurred in the last 20 years. The County land use designation does not designate the annexation lands for Agriculture. The current County General Plan designations for 40 acres of the annexation area is 313, Residential 0.2 to 0.4 units per acre. The other 160 acres are designated 3A, Residential 0.4 to 2 units per acre. That portion of the annexation area designated 3A could generate 320 dwelling units, and the 3B designated land could generate 16 dwelling units, for a total of 336 residential units. The 40 acre parcel to the southeast of the proposed annexation area, and previously included, is also designated 313, Residential 0.2 to 0.4, and could generate 16 dwelling units. There is no specific project proposed with the annexation and associated Zoning Map amendment. The maximum number of units which could be generated under the City designation on the 200 acre annexation land is 800 units. It is likely, however, that either a standard tract or a country club development will occur. This type of development in La Quinta has typically resulted in densities of between 2 and 3 units per acre. Such a development would be similar to the densities which are currently allowed under the Riverside County General Plan. The property owner of the 40 acres located at the northwest corner of Avenue 53 and Monroe Street (the Waters property) provided comments on the original Environmental Assessment. These comments included concern that the development of the acreage to the north and west of their property would result in conflicts between their existing agricultural land use and the future residential land uses. The property owner requested both a buffer and a notification process be implemented by the City. The development of residential land uses on the annexation area will result in the construction of a 6 foot wall along western and northern the property lines of the 40 acre parcel. The current County General Plan includes discussion of buffers between agricultural and residential land uses, without specifying the size of such buffers. The City has adopted a "right to farm" ordinance since the last public hearing on this matter. This ordinance is equivalent to that currently in place under the County's jurisdiction. This ordinance protects agricultural operations from the potential complaints which can arise from neighbors of agricultural land uses. The ordinance also requires that developers of residential projects adjacent to active agricultural land uses notify potential buyers within 300 feet of the 5.30 agricultural land use that they are purchasing a home near an agricultural land use. This ordinance has been effective in protecting agriculture from such o 21. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesAdd2.WPD 2 complaints under the County's jurisdiction. The City's ordinance provides equivalent protection and mitigation from this potential impact. Any developer on the subject property will be required to provide such notification to purchasers of residential lots or homes. A physical separation between the agricultural land use to the south and the proposed annexation would provide added buffering between the agricultural and the residential land uses. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1. All development proposals within the proposed annexation area which will occur adjacent to existing active agriculture shall be required to incorporate a 100 foot landscaped setback from the property line(s) of the adjacent agriculture into development plans. No structure shall be permitted within the setbacks. 2. For any residential development proposed on the parcels currently identified as 767-200-004, 005, 009 and 010, potential purchasers shall be notified of the existence of agricultural lands immediately south or east, following the same procedures as those included in the City's "right to farm" ordinance. The notification will include disclosure of the use of chemicals, fertilizers and pesticides, night-time operations, potential odors and potentially high noise levels on the adjacent agricultural lands. At the public hearing held on this matter in October, 2001, the Waters' representative provided additional data relating to agricultural buffers, in the form of two articles on the subject. These articles are summarized below: "Protecting Farmland on the Edge: What policies and programs work?" (Jerry Paulson) The article addresses counties in southern Wisconsin and northern Illinois. The article describes development patterns in two counties in Illinois, where development pressures are not intense. The Illinois counties have established policies which encourage the preservation of agriculture. The cities within these counties generally consider the economic benefits of annexation as the primary reason to annex lands. Economic development and a logical extension of services are primary drivers in development decisions. In Wisconsin, the local jurisdictions (towns and cities) within the counties studied have a strong voice in the protection of local land use decisions. Land uses regulations which encourage agriculture are contained in County plans. In both states, agricultural preservation has been addressed extensively through tax incentives rather than land use controls. Transfer of development rights and conservation easements are discussed as tools being considered in this area, as are greenbelts and growth management. The author indicates that without a combination of planning policy and political will (through the election of slow growth candidates), effective agriculture preservation is not possible. 531 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesAdd2.WPD 3 "Defining the Edge: An Introduction to Agricultural Buffers." The material is labeled a "workbook," and includes a description of typical complaints between urban and agricultural land uses, and a number of alternatives for buffers. These include: walls or vertical plantings; separation by existing topography or infrastructure; building requirements (including setbacks and building placement); use of recreational facilities as separators (trails, golf courses, ball fields and wildlife corridors); and the voluntary conversion of crops, particularly to organic farming. The article also addresses how to pay for the costs of these buffers, and contains an extensive discussion of the process which should be undertaken to develop buffers and determine which type(s) will be implemented. Finally, the document provides a description of how to start a buffer development process. III. c) & d) The primary source of air pollution in the City is the automobile. Although annexation will not cause an increase in air emissions in and of itself, the buildout of the project will. The proposed land use designation for the project site is low density residential, 0-4 units per acre. At this density, a maximum of 800 single family residences would be possible. Based on calculations provided by the Institute of Traffic Engineers, 800 units could generate up to 7,656 trips per day'. As shown in the Table below, buildout of the annexation area will not exceed any SCAQMD thresholds. Running Exhaust Emissions (pounds/day) PM10 PM10 PM10 CO ROC NOx Exhaust Brakes Tires 50 mph 237.29 9.13 48.67 Daily Threshold* 550 75 100 -- 1.01 1.01 150 Based on 7,656 trips/day and average trip length of 6 miles, using EMFAC7G Model provided by California Air Resources Board. Assumes catalytic light autos at 75°F. * Operational thresholds provided by SCAQMD for assistance in determining the significance of a project. The Coachella Valley is a non -attainment area for PM 10 (particulate matter of 10 microns or smaller). In order to control PM10, the City has imposed standards and requirements on development to control dust. 1 Institute of Transportation Engineers, "Trip Generation, 6th Edition." Rate calculated for single family residential, at 9.57 trips per day. J 3 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesAdd2.WPD 4 kj 2_ 3 Although no immediate project is proposed, the disturbance of the site for construction will eventually have an impact on air quality from PM 10. These impacts can be mitigated by the mitigation measures below. 1. No earth moving activity shall be undertaken without the review and approval of a PM 10 Management Plan. The applicant shall submit same to the City Engineer for review and approval. 2. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. 3. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation. 4. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 5. Cut and fill quantities will be balanced on site. 6. Any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. 7. Watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on -going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. 8. All disturbed areas shall be treated to prevent erosion until the site is constructed upon. Pad sites which are to remain undeveloped shall be seeded with either a desert wildflower mix or grass seed. 9. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. 10. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean up of construction -related dirt on approach routes to the site. 11. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. 12. All buildings on the project site shall conform to energy use guidelines in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesAdd2.WPD 5 533 1112 4 13. The project shall provide for non -motorized transportation facilities and shall implement all feasible measures to encourage the use of alternate transportation measures. 14. Bicycle racks and/or other mandated alternative transportation provisions shall be included in project design, in conformance with City ordinances in effect at the time of development. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, the impacts to air quality from buildout of the annexation area will not be significant. Moreover, improvements in technology which are likely to reduce impacts, particularly from motor vehicles or transit route improvements in the future are not included in the analysis. IV. a) The annexation area was previously studied for biological resources'. The biological analysis concluded that four types of habitat occur on the site: Desert Scrub, Agriculture, Pasture and Disturbed. No species of concern were identified in site surveys conducted specifically for Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard, Palm Springs Ground Squirrel, Palm Springs Pocket Mouse and Flat Tailed Horned Lizard. The area was, however, identified as having mesquite hummocks, which provide important habitat for a number of desert species. The proposed annexation area includes several mesquite hummocks. In order to mitigate this potential impact, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2 1. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent(s) shall submit an on -site biological resource analysis identifying the total acreage of mesquite hummocks on the 200 acre site, or any portion thereof proposed for development. 2. Prior to construction or site preparation activities, the project proponent(s) shall enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the California Department of Fish and Game and an appropriate non- profit organization whose purpose is to acquire and manage land for the purpose of protecting special status plants and wildlife. This MOU shall provide the organization chosen the financial resources necessary to purchase and manage the equivalent acreage identified in mitigation measure #1 of mesquite hummock habitat in the Willow Hole area. "Biological Assessment for the Country Club of the Desert Project," Michael Brandman Associates, May 2000. 534 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesAdd2.WPD 6 L, 2 3 V. b) Annexation of the project site will not, in of itself, have an impact on cultural resources. Buildout of the site, however, could impact such resources. A cultural resource survey was conducted for the subject property3. The survey found a number of resources in the area, but only very limited resources on the annexation area property. In order to ensure that buried resources are not lost if they occur, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1. A qualified archaeological monitor shall be present during all demolition, earth moving and grading activities. The monitor shall be empowered to stop or redirect activities on the site should a resource be identified. A final report shall be filed with the Community Development Department prior to occupancy. VI. a) i) & ii) The proposed project lies in a Zone III groundshaking zone. The property, as with the rest of the City, will be subject to significant ground movement in the event of a major earthquake. The site is not subject to liquefaction¢. In order to protect the City from hazards associated with groundshaking, the City has adopted the Uniform Building Code, and the associated construction requirements for seismic zones. The City Engineer will require the preparation of site -specific geotechnical analysis in conjunction with the submittal of grading plans (please see below). This requirement will ensure that impacts from ground failure are reduced to a less than significant level. V1. b) & c) The subject property is subject to soil erosion due to wind. The City will impose requirements for a PM 10 management plan, which will control this hazard (please see above). The soils on the property will also be examined through an on -site soil analysis required prior to issuance of grading permits. These requirements will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. VII. a) & b) Written and oral public testimony was presented at the October 2001 public hearing on this matter which stated that the use of pesticides on the property immediately south of the annexation area presented a potential hazard. The 3 4 "A Phase I Cultural Resource Investigation of the Country Club of the Desert Project Area..." McKenna et. al., September 1999. "Draft Environmental Impact Report, Country Club of the Desert," SCH #99061109, Impact Sciences, August 2000. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesAdd2.WPD 7 535 + o testimony further stated that there were mandated buffer areas required for the use of these pesticides. Research undertaken through the Office of the Agricultural Commissioner resulted in the followings: 1. There is no permit, nor has there been, to allow use Methyl Bromide on the property immediately south of the annexation area. 2. Should the owners wish to secure a permit and use Methyl Bromide, they would be required to provide a buffer of 60 feet from the area being sprayed and occupied structures (based on fumigation of 10 acres per day, which would be the maximum which could be expected to be applied in one day). 3. Methyl Bromide will be illegal to use by 2005. 4. The only buffer required for the use of Dormex is 330 feet, if the Office of the Agricultural Commissioner receives a complaint from a producer of lemons that the application of Dormex on adjacent lands has damaged his or her crop. There is no lemon production within the annexation area. 5. Dormex has been used on the Waters property, with appropriate permits. 6. Vapam can be used without permitting. It is used on fallow land to kill weeds prior to planting. It emits an odor similar to rotten eggs. If the chemical is being delivered through a sprinkler system, a buffer of 500 feet is required. If the chemical is being delivered through a drip irrigation system, no buffer is required. 7. The Waters property has a drip irrigation system. The application of chemicals for agricultural use, therefore, does not pose a significant impact on adjacent property, nor does the location of residential uses to the north of the Waters property impose an undue restriction on the use of chemicals by the land owners. VIII. b) Domestic water is provided by the Coachella Valley Water District, which extracts groundwater from a number of wells in the Lower Thermal sub -basin. The CVWD Draft Water Management Plan includes a Preferred Alternative (Alternative 4) for the management and recharge of groundwater, which results in positive cumulative water storage for the period from 1999 to 2035 (Table Personal Communication, George Kregl, Office of the Agricultural Commissioner, December 7, 2001. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesAdd2.WPD 8 536 (,l27 6-1). Although not yet adopted, the Draft Water Management Plan constitutes the best available information on the subject of water resources available at this time. Comments made on the original and revised Environmental Assessment indicated a concern regarding water usage associated with residential development. The comments included an attached letter from Pace Engineering, calculating water usage for another project. Although no source or reference is provided for the data used in the Pace letter of June 7, 2001, the author uses an average of 150 gallons per person per day for residential land uses. The proposed annexation area encompasses 200 acres of low density residential land which could generate up to 800 dwelling units. The City's current average household size is 1.99 persons. Therefore, the potential water consumption within the annexation area boundary at buildout would be 238,800 gallons per day, or 0.73 acre feet per day, or 267 acre feet per year. Data provided by the Coachella Valley Water District for the parcels included in the 200 acre annexation area show that a total of 7,329 acre feet of Canal water has been provided to metered locations on 80 acres in the last 10 years. This represents an average annual water usage of 733 acre feet for 80 acres, or 9.2 acre feet per year per acre. If extended to agricultural land use on all 200 acres, an annual usage of 1,832 acre feet per year would be expected for the annexation area of 200 acres. The 267 acre feet estimated for usage by 800 residential units would therefore represent only 14.6% of the average annual usage of agricultural land uses within the annexation area for the last 10 years. Since Canal water is the primary source of water recharge plans being implemented by CVWD for groundwater recharge, the current use of Canal water for irrigation can be used in direct comparison to groundwater usage. The buildout of the annexation area with all residential land uses would therefore reduce existing impacts to water resources, and would represent a beneficial impact. Alternatively, if the 200 acre annexation area were to develop as a golf course and residential development, with 100 acres of golf course and 100 acres of residential development, yielding up to 400 single family units (a similar land use distribution to that found at the adjacent approved Country Club of the Desert project), the annexation area would require 883 acre feet of water annually, based on the factors supplied by Pace Engineering (133 acre feet for the residential component, and 750 acre feet for the golf component). This represents only 48.2% of the water which would be expected to be used if all 200 acres were in agriculture. Further, the lands which would develop as golf course would be irrigated with canal water, not groundwater6. 537 6 Personal communication, Steve Robbins, Coachella Valley Water District, December, 2001. G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesAdd2.WPD 9 With either land use scenario, therefore, the impacts to water resources would be considerably less than those which would result from the use of the land for agriculture. Regardless of the type of development which occurs on the site, all landscaping will be required to comply with the standards of the City's landscape water conservation ordinance, which mandates reductions in both irrigation and evapotranspiration. This standard will further reduce the potential impacts associated with groundwater within the annexation area. The City requires that the following standards be implemented through the design and construction of projects. These standards shall be implemented for any development proposed within the annexation area. 1. If a golf course is proposed within the annexation area, a Water Conservation Plan shall be prepared which demonstrates the use of drought tolerant plants and water efficient irrigation. The Water Conservation shall be submitted to both the City and CVWD for review and approval. 2. If a golf course is proposed within the annexation area, it shall be irrigated with Canal water, not groundwater. 3. Water efficient landscaping, as prescribed by City codes, shall be used as a means of reducing water consumption associated with any project within the annexation area. 4. Efficient irrigation systems that minimize runoff and evaporation and maximize the watering of plant roots shall be encouraged. Drip irrigation and moisture detectors may also increase the efficiency of irrigation systems. 5. In conformance with Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code, Title 20, California Administrative Code Section 1601(b), and applicable sections of Title 24 of the State Code, low -flush toilets and water conserving shower heads and faucets shall be required. Vill. c)-e) When the annexation area is developed, impermeable surfaces will be created, which will change drainage patterns in a rain event. Any project on the site will be required to meet the City's standards for retention of the 100 year storm on - site. This will control the amount of runoff which exits the site during a storm. The site's drainage plan will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of grading permits. This will ensure that impacts to the City's flood control system are reduced to a less than significant level. 533 u'23 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesAdd2.WPD 10 IX. b) The County of Riverside currently has jurisdiction over the annexation area. The land use designation for the subject property under the County General Plan is 3A and 313, which allow 0.4-2 units and 0.2 to 0.4 units per acre, respectively. The City's proposed Low Density Residential designation will therefore somewhat increase this density, but will maintain the intended residential character of the area. The character of the property will not be changed by the proposed action, insofar as residential development would be expected to occur on this site under either jurisdiction. Finally, the adjacent lands to the west are being developed in residential units in a low density. The impacts associated with adjacency to existing agricultural land uses immediately south of the proposed annexation area have been addressed and mitigated under item II, above. The mitigation measures proposed are consistent with current conditions and standards under Riverside County's jurisdiction. The County's intent for the properties in this area is clearly defined as residential in their General Plan. The agricultural land uses will continue to operate at the owners' discretion under County jurisdiction. The impacts to land use are not expected to be significant. XI. a) b) & c) The noise environment in the annexation area is generally quiet, due to limited development and low traffic volumes. The ultimate development of the site will result in an increase in noise levels, particularly noise generated by automobiles. The proposed land use designation will result in residential land uses on the site, which are considered sensitive receptors. In order to ensure that these sensitive receptors are not subject to noise impacts, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: Xlll.a) 1 . Any project on the subject property shall be required to complete a noise analysis which includes current conditions and anticipated buildout noise levels, and which includes mitigation measures to ensure that exterior and interior noise levels meet City standards in effect at that time. The analysis shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department prior to issuance of building permits, and shall demonstrate compliance with the City's noise standards and shall demonstrate compliance with the City's noise standards. Annexation and construction of the subject property will result in potential impacts for both police and fire services. The property, once developed, will generate property tax. These taxes will contribute to the City's General Fund, and offset the potential impact to police and fire service. The project will also be required to pay school fees, as required by law. The proposed project is not expected to have a significant impact on municipal services or facilities. 533 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesAdd2.WPD 11 L •j XV. a) & b) Based on comments received on the original Environmental Assessment, a traffic study has been prepared for the proposed annexation application'. The traffic analysis assumed that low density residential development totaling 960 units would occur on a 240 acre site (the 40 acre property now deleted from the annexation area was included in the traffic analysis). The analysis examined the potential impacts on the area's circulation system. It is important to note that the firm which completed this analysis also prepared the analysis for the General Plan, and therefore has the most current and accurate data available for the City's circulation system. The study found that with buildout of the proposed annexation area, combined with buildout of other projects based on General Plan designations, the intersections within the project area will all operate at a Level of Service D or better, which meets the City's standards for roadway operations. Improvements required, and to be installed as development occurs, include signalization of the Madison/Avenue 52, Monroe/Avenue 52, Monroe/Avenue 53 intersections, and widening of Monroe, Madison and Avenue 52 to City General Plan standards. It is important to note that the widening and signalization will be required even if the proposed annexation area does not build out. The City requires that development contribute its fair share to street improvements as development occurs through its developer impact fee. Such a requirement will be imposed within the annexation area to ensure that levels of service are maintained at an acceptable level. XVI. b)-f) Although the annexation will have no impact on utilities, the ultimate buildout of the site will have an impact on utilities and public services. However, the overall impacts of the project on these services is not expected to be significant, insofar as these suppliers will charge the residents for their services, and provide improvements to these services as needed. In addition, connection fees will be required of the project proponent at construction of the project. These fees and charges will mitigate the potential impacts to a less than significant level. 7 "Country Club of the Desert Traffic Impact Analysis," prepared by Urban Crossroads, October 4, 2001. 540 G:\WPDOCS\Env Asses\CCDesAdd2.WPD 12 ORDINANCE 2002- A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE ASSIGNING LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION TO APPROXIMATELY 200 ACRES LOCATED GENERALLY AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MONROE STREET AND AVENUE 52 CASE NO.: ZONE CHANGE 2001-100 APPLICANT: NRI LA QUINTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP COUNTRY CLUB OF THE DESERT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 3rd day of July, 2001, continued to the 17th day of July, 2001, 7th day of August, 2001, 18th day of September, 2001, 20th day of November, 2001, 18th day of December, 2001, 19th day of February, 2002, 21 st day of May, 2002 and renoticed for the 18th day of June 2002, to hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2001-418 for Zone Change 2001-100, and annexation, for the property generally located at the southwest corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 52, more particularly described as follows: APN's 767-200-002, 003, 004, 005, 007, 008, 009, AND 010 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 26th day of June, 2001 hold duly noticed Public Hearing for NRI La Quinta Limited Partnership for review of a Pre -Annexation Zone Change to allow the pre - zoning of approximately 200 acres, pending annexation to the City, located generally at the southwest corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 52, and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings to approve said Zone Change: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan, and land use designations, ensuring land use compatibility. 2. The Zone Change will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, as it has been designed to be compatible with surrounding development, and conform with the City's standards and requirements. 3. The Zone Change is compatible with the City's Zoning Ordinance in that it supports the development of a range of housing in an integrated community. 541 A2 P:Uerry\CCDesCCOrdZC 100.wpd Ordinance No. _ Zone Change 2001-100 NRI La Quinta Limited Partnership - Country Club of the Desert Adopted: June 18, 2002 4. The Zone Change, to be effective upon annexation of the property, supports the orderly development of the City. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.PURPOSE. To rezone approximately 200 acres, pending annexation to the City, located generally at the southwest corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 52, more particularly described as: APN's 767-200-002, 003, 004, 005, 007, 008, 009, AND 010 from County Zoning of Light Agriculture (A-1-20) to Low Density Residential as attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and "B", and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL. This Zone Change has complied with the requirements of the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended) and adopted by City Council Resolution 83-68, in that the Community Development Director has determined that the proposed Zone Change will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4: POSTING. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three public places designated by Resolution of the City Council, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of June, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 5402 kj00 P:\Jerry\CCDesCCOrdZC 100.wpd Ordinance No. _ Zone Change 2001-100 NRI La Quinta Limited Partnership - Country Club of the Desert Adopted: June 18, 2002 JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC/AAE City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California '�4 PAJerry\CCDesCCOrdZC 100.wpd ZONE CHANGE 2001-100 EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED NRI LA QUINTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ADOPTED: JUNE 18, 2002 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Zone Change. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. _ 544 PAJerry\CC DesCCOrdZC 100.wpd O O I Q N a 1I94ZI 1,i,/VNAV,4; �®a1�1�K ;/;1�i�1�1�� # 1•...1.�.1.1.1.,!1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1�1.1. • — /111/' >1i��i11♦<�11111111111111♦1�1Il 1111♦ :<111�III�IIIIII,i11®11,� �1011�1 j1111111 j11111 j �11�11111i1111�11111111111�11101i111�1111 � �lr-M- 1 j1ir11®1 X �jI jI 1/11111111111111111 �111�1�111111111�1�1111111�1111�1' ::1�1�1�111'ri3�61a11/1/111/1/1/1�11111� �1111111111111111�11111�111�IIIIIiili�ili7� ►.�i�i��,`�i+iV1Mr IMW,1�11�1;1;1;1;1;1;�;1;1;1�1�1�� • u� C 0 ATTACHMENT #1 Planning Commission Minutes June 26, 2001 ROLL CALL: AY . Commissioners Abels, Butler, Tyler, and Chairman obbins. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Kirk. Commissioner Kirk rejoined the Commission. B. Environmental Assessment 2001-418, General Plan Amendment 2001- 077, and Zone Change 2001-100: a request of NRI, La Quinta Limited Partnership for certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, approval of a pre -annexation General Plan designation from County designation 2B to Low Density Residential and a Zone Change from County designation A-1-20 to Low Density Residential for the property bounded on the north by Avenue 52, on the east by Monroe Street, on the south by Avenue 53, and on the east by the existing City limits. 1. Chairman Robbins opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Community Development Director Jerry Herman presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Robbins asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Abels asked staff to confirm that the Ms. Waters would be able to maintain her agricultural operation as it now exists. Staff stated that is correct unless the operation ceases to operate for over a year. In that case it may not. If, however, the City adopts an Agricultural designation and zones this property as Agricultural, then the use can continue forever. 3. Commissioner Kirk asked what legal counsel's opinion on the letter received from Ms. Waters attorney in regard to the City's CEQA documentation and process. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated that in regard to the allegations that they would not be able to change crops or replant, that is obviously incorrect under the City's Zoning Code. With regard to the issue of a proposed residential development, at this time there is no residential project application. At such time as an application is received and is being processed, it would be appropriate at that time to formulate mitigation measures that would provide notice to prospective property owners in this location. At this time it would be premature. In regard to the Agricultural issues, it is her J_ UI-516 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC6-.26-01.wpd 4 Planning Commission Minutes June 26, 2001 understanding there are no Williamson Act contracts according to the environmental documents. Community Development Director Jerry Herman clarified that since the environmental document had been prepared, it had been learned that two parcels did have the Williamson Act contract, but applications have been applied for, for non -renewal. This has to be completed before the property can be annexed. Commissioner Kirk asked how the Williamson Act applies here in regard to Ms. Waters property. Staff stated he did not know if Ms. Waters property was under the Williamson Act. Commissioner Kirk asked if the statements in the letter in regard to the overdraft issue is it also not right. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated that was correct. 4. Commissioner Butler stated that during the public hearing process of the Country Club of the Desert, these issues were addressed at that time by Ms. Waters. Staff noted that when the Country Club of the Desert was approved by Council it was conditioned to inform property owners of this use. There is no application on this site and therefore there is no way of conditioning it at this time as this is only a pre -zoning application only. 5. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to identify Ms. Waters parcel. Staff did so. Commissioner Tyler asked if the action being taken by the Commission at this meeting would place any restrictions on her property in regard to what she could do. Staff stated that it had been the direction of the City Council to preserve the agricultural and equestrian uses. Staff is drafting language to do this in the General Plan update. Commissioner Tyler asked what would determine the zoning and her uses in the interim period. Staff stated this preannexation zoning and General Plan designation has no affect on Ms. Water's property until such time as LAFCO officially annexes the property. These applications have to go to the City Council for public hearing. The applications are then prepared and submitted to LAFCO with the appropriate fees. LAFCO normally takes four to six months to process an application and at the end of that time the zoning would be in place. This could take up to a year and a half before the overlay was in place. Until that time, the only restriction on her property would be that she could not add or enlarge any agricultural buildings. The residential units are not affected. If the Commission directed staff to do so, staff could prepare an amendment to the Zoning Code in regard to nonconforming uses. 047 6. Chairman Robbins asked if the City had any a agricultural zoning.,..! 3 8 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC6-26-01.wpd 5 Planning Commission Minutes June 26, 2001 Staff stated that at this time there is no such zoning, and therefore could not annex this property in with an agricultural zoning designation. Chairman Robbins stated his concern was that this property owner was being asked to go on faith that the City will do this. Is the entire area being considered for annexation under farming. Staff noted it is mostly sod farming, equestrian, or farming uses. Chairman Robbins noted that if the land is developed, the water usage would be the same whether it is being farmed or has residential uses. 7. Commissioner Kirk asked if Ms. Water's property could be removed from the annexation area. Staff stated it could be done, but LAFCO prefers an annexation area to have squared off boundaries, but the final decision is up to LAFCO. Staff noted that if this property is left out of the annexation and decides at a later date to annex into the City, the property owner at that time would be responsible for paying all the fees for the annexation. 8. Chairman Robbins asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Ms. Nancy Aaronson, representing NRI, La Quinta Limited Partnership, stated that they and Mr. Debonne own 80% of the annexation area. They currently do not have plans for the site, but do expect their use to be compatible with any agricultural uses. 9. Commissioner Butler asked how the applicant could address the issues raised by Ms. Waters. Ms. Aaronson stated she had briefly read the letter prepared by Ms. Water's attorney, but some of the issues sited as being unique to a farming operation are very much applicable to a golf course operation. They run heavy equipment, machinery, fertilizers, workers coming and going, the application of chemicals, pesticides, very much like a farming operation. In the event they were to develop this site with a golf course, they would be sensitive to the agricultural operation. 10. Commissioner Tyler stated he is aware of the noise issues of a golf course living in close proximity to one. He asked Ms. Aaronson to identify who NRI was in regard to the Country Club of the Desert. Ms. Aaronson stated this is a third partnership with related partners. They are all affiliated. 11. Chairman Robbins asked if there was any other public comment. Ms. Waters stated that she lives on a golf course and it is a 548 different type of operations. Her operation involves a lot of G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC6-26-01.wpd 6 Planning Commission Minutes June 26, 2001 machinery being operated during the middle of the night not just 5:00 or 6:00 in the morning. The chemicals they use are not the same as a golf course operation. In addition, she is concerned that they had to drill down an additional 700 feet to reach ground water as their water source had dried up. Therefore, she is concerned what will happen when the golf courses go in. Her concern is that the neighbors will eventually object to her farming use and she will have problems continuing her farming operation. She would suggest there be a 500-foot buffer between the two uses. She would like to be left out of the annexation. 12. Chairman Robbins stated the Country Club of the Desert will be using canal water which will have no affect on the ground water. They will have domestic wells for people uses. There are farmers who continue to use ground water for farming and this is one of the issues that need to be addressed. The overdraft of the water in this location of the Valley is due to the water for people to drink and for farmers who chose to use ground water for farming. In the overall picture, the site is better off with residential uses than farming. 13. Commissioner Butler explained that pre -annexation does not take away Ms. Water's rights to farm. Ms. Waters stated her concern is that when people do move in, they will be before the Council complaining about all the things that she is required to do to farm her property. 14. Commissioner Tyler asked if Ms. Water's concerns were with the impact her farming operation would have on the potential future residents. Ms. Waters stated yes, and those issues raised in the letter written by her attorney, Mr. Hargraves. Commissioner Tyler stated that whether or not she is annexed, the project will be built, and the issues she is concerned with will still exist. 15. Ms. Gayle Cady, 82-831 Avenue 54, stated this is the first time she has heard any mention of the possibility of an agricultural zone in the City of La Quinta. The parcel in question is in a prime equestrian as well as agricultural area. She does not know if it is true or not that an agricultural use would use the same amount of water as a residential use. Due to the location of this site next to the polo clubs and Desert Horse Circuit, we have the largest conglomerate of horses west of the Mississippi. This needs to be taken into consideration because the smell of horse manure will become an issue to these residents. She is also concerned about 54 .4n G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC6-26-01.wpd 7 Planning Commission Minutes June 26, 2001 the noise ordinance which would not allow tractors to operate at all hours of the night. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated that under City ordinances there are no ordinances regarding agricultural machinery. City Attorney Kathy Jenson stated there is a general noise ordinance in the Nuisance Section that says it is a nuisance for a person to make cause, or suffer, or permit to make unnecessary sounds which are physically annoying to persons of ordinary sensitivity, etc. There is a section that pertains to construction specific hours and days for construction noise, but the Code clearly anticipates that existing, nonconforming uses can continue in its intensity, so it is a good argument that the Code would allow the existing levels of noise. If there is an existing use that is established that may create nuisance effects, if there is residential development coming to that area, it will not be considered a nuisance because it is first in time. 16. Commissioner Tyler stated he was surprised to hear Ms. Cady state that this is the first time she has heard mention of an agricultural overlay. He has attended many of the annexation and General Plan hearings and at each meeting the discussion has been to leave agricultural as it is where it is until the property owner want to make the change. Staff noted this has been the City's direction since annexation first started. Ms. Cady stated she was addressing Chairman Robbins comment directly as she was not aware of a specific zone for agriculture and/or equestrian. In addition, the horse industry brings in approximately $2 million dollars annually to the community. 17. Ms. Ellen Lloyd Trover, 82-150 Avenue 54, noted there is no equestrian overlay mentioned in the draft EIR prepared for the General Plan update. She does not understand the agricultural overlay and she is a retired attorney and does have a little experience in reading legal documents. To her it is premature to define what these things say until they can see the final ordinance is writing. Therefore, she does not know what Ms. Waters would be able to do. It is her understanding in listening to the time table explained by staff, to bring the annexation to LAFCO, but obviously it is unknown what will happen during the hearings before it goes to LAFCO, nor do they know the exact process before LAFCO or disputes that may delay it. Therefore, they are considering an indefinite time that Ms. Waters may have to operate under a system where we do not know whether or not she would be able to change her current operation should she need to modify them to continue her business. Also, we do not know 550 Al. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC6-26-01.wpd 8 Planning Commission Minutes June 26, 2001 exactly what the overlays will allow. She is concerned about the ground water use in the Valley. If this area is rezoned for Low Density Residential then they are talking about at least a potential for four houses per acre. For Ms. Waters property that would mean four houses that would be using ground water which would be an increase in the demand for more ground water to be used than her one residence uses. She is aware that CVWD has a Water Management Plan, but as she understands it the EIR is not prepared yet. It is a multi -agency plan so who knows how long it will take to get all the agencies into conformity and agreement with this plan or how long it will take to get it adopted and what modifications may take place during the public hearings. If the plan remains as it is written today, it will be the year 2019 before we stabilize the ground water overdraft. She realizes this is not a huge project, but she does realize we have to start looking at every single project and assessing its impact on ground water, because we have to remember we live in the desert and without water we will have nothing here. She is unsure what she is objecting to except the "ifiness" of the project. 18. Commissioner Abels noted that the City is very concerned with water uses. 19. There being no further public comment, Chairman Robbins closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened the project for Commission discussion. 20. Commissioner Tyler stated that most of what has been stated is probably beyond what can be decided at this time. 21. Commissioner Butler stated he knows CVWD has taken into consideration the ground water problems in the Valley and are putting in ponds that will regenerate the sources. In considering the applications that are before the Commission, he does not have as many concerns as he will when an application for development is brought before the Commission. 22. Commissioner Abels stated there will be many issues both pro and con in regard to annexation and the Commission will have to address them as they come up. 23. Commissioner Kirk stated the issues are not right for consideration J J 1 until a specific project is proposed. Ms. Water has shown a lot of good sense by addressing this at an early stage. Some of her A 2 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC6-26-01.wpd 9 Planning Commission Minutes June 26, 2001 concerns cannot be addressed at this time in regard to conditions which could mitigate those concerns, as there is no application before them for development. He reminded the Commission of another project that was considered by the Commission. There were different, conflicting land uses, but there the property owners of the Low Density Residential were given notice when they bought their property that there would be a condominium project with higher density next to them. They all received the notification and signed off on knowing it would be there. Yet, when that project came before the Commission, they protested the development of the project. Ms. Waters is right, the proposed project will be a wonderful project, and the people buying there will object to the equipment used in her farming operation. Therefore, he does agree that she has a right to be concerned. At the same time, he concurs with Commissioner Butler, development is going to occur whether or not it is in the City or County. There are three options before the Commission: 1) approve the request as proposed; 2) reject it; or 3) approve the request for everything except Ms. Waters property. Therefore, he would suggest that at this time they remove Ms. Waters property from the annexation area. He would caution Ms. Waters that there is an old saying about "being in the tent versus doing something out of the tent". She may want to reconsider this decision. From his perspective he would rather be in the City addressing his neighbors rather than being in another jurisdiction. When she has to come before the Council to request a setback for this project, she will be in the County rather than in the City. She needs to make some strategic decisions. She knows the project will be developed and should be looking at this in how best to approach it. 24. Chairman Robbins stated he has a lot of compassion for Ms. Waters, but what they are considering is an eventual annexation. An annexation in and of itself does not change the land use or any impact on what is currently there. He would agree that Ms. Waters would be better off as part of the City rather than outside the City limits. He would suggest they make a recommendation that the City move forward with the annexation directing staff to start the process of putting the equestrian/agricultural zoning in place. 25. Commissioner Butler asked staff if creating a new zoning would be contrary to what they are trying to achieve. Ms. Waters wants to j J M 4 3 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC6-26-01.wpd 10 Planning Commission Minutes June 26, 2001 retain her use and it has never been the City's desire to remove the use. Staff stated we do not have an agricultural zone or land use in General Plan or Zoning Code. In order to accomplish what Ms. Waters wants we would have to continue this public hearing and staff would have to create a land use designation and policy for agricultural. Staff would have to create a zoning text amendment for agricultural uses and then schedule those for public hearings before the Commission and City Council. This is the only way her property and use could be made conforming. The other option is to remove her from this annexation and address it when the other annexation is brought forward which may be as much as a year to two years away. Commissioner Butler asked if her property was removed would it have any affect on the proposed annexation. Staff stated it would be submitted to LAFCO for their decision. 26. Chairman Robbins asked if Ms. Waters was the only property owner not included on the application. Staff stated that was correct. 27. Commissioner Abels asked staff to clarify what was before the Commission. Staff explained that what was before the Commission was preannexation zoning and land use. 28. Commissioner Tyler stated the Council has continually reiterated that the City is not actively pursuing annexation. We are reacting to those requesting to be annexed. 29. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-090, recommending to the City Council certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2001-418, with the clarification on what properties are within the Williamson Act designation and have been noticed to discontinue. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Robbins. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. 5�5�3 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC6-26-01.wpd 11 Planning Commission Minutes June 26, 2001 30. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Abels to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-091 recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment 2001-077, subject to the findings and the elimination of APN 767-200-01 1. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Robbins. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. 31. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Abels to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2001-092 recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change 2001-100, subject to the findings and the elimination of APN 767-200-01 1 . ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Robbins. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. VII. BUSINESS ITkMS: A. Sign ApDliclation 20001-554; a request of Palm Royale Country Club for approval of a ument sign to be located at the southeast corner of Washington Str ont and Fred Waring Drive. 1. Chairman Rob`b�ns and Commissioner Tyler excused themselves and withdrew fr6m the dias due to a possible conflict of interest due to the location o'f.,their residences in proximity to the project. 1 . Vice Chairman Abels ask6d,for the staff report. Associate Planner Michele Rambo presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Vice Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Butler asked staff to clarify what they were recommending in regard to the size of the si n. Staff stated the face is six feet six inches and the base is an a itional 18 inches. Planning Manager Christine di lorio stated the de defines the height as being at the grade of the sign. Commi ioner Butler asked if lighting was being proposed. Staff stated i ould be externally illuminated with flood lights. 554 4 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\PC6-26-01.wpd 12 ATTACHMENT #2 City Council Minutes 12 November 20, 2001 MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Henderson/ olph to approve the name Desert Club Manor Park for the park site locate etween Saguaro and Bottlebrush Drives. Motion carried unanimousl MINUTE ORDER NO. 2001-164. Council recessed to and until 7:00 p.m. 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT Maddy Waters, 81-J-60 Avenue 53, voiced concern that she may not be able to continue sprayin hemicals on her grape fields because of a new development next to her propertnd asked Council to consider requiring a buffer zone. SENTATIONS - None PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING. TO CERTIFY A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-418 AND A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WITHIN THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR SUBSEQUENT ANNEXATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 200 ACRES, BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY AVENUE 52, ON THE EAST BY MONROE STREET, ON THE SOUTH BY AVENUE 53, AND EAST OF THE EXISTING CITY LIMITS. APPLICANT: NRI, LA QUINTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. Community Development Director Herman presented the staff report. Maddy Waters, 81-150 Avenue 53, reiterated her concerns voiced under public comment about not being able to spray chemicals on her grape fields, which is located next to the proposed development. She didn't feel it would be right for • 555 j 4 0 • 11 • City Council Minutes 13 November 20, 2001 her to break the law by continuing to spray her crops just because other farmers do it. Bob Hargreaves, 74-760 Highway 1 1 1, Indian Wells, attorney with Best, Best, & Krieger, spoke regarding agricultural conservation and potential conflicts when residential developments are located next to agricultural properties. He stated he felt residential developments use more water than agriculture because agriculture uses irrigation water. He also distributed information on protecting farmlands and agricultural buffers and encouraged a full EIR study to make sure everything possible is done to protect farm resources. Ellen Lloyd Trover, P. 0. Box 297, Coachella, agreed more study is needed when water usage, prime farm land, and liquefaction issues are involved. She encouraged use of the "golden rule" and listening to the farmers before making a decision. She also urged Council to require a buffer zone so Ms. Waters can continue farming. Garfield Logan, 30-448 Rancho Viejo Road, San Juan Capistrano, representing RWD Ranch, stated he felt the issue is whether or not Coachella Valley is going to continue as a farming community or be an extension of other subdivisions or golf courses. He felt a comprehensive plan is needed in order for the two interests to be balanced and he voiced opposition to adopting a Negative Declaration. Nancy Aaronson, representing the applicant, stated they have tried to address all the issues and are in agreement with the staff report. She advised the project is part of their overall development plan, which they desire to be under La Quinta's jurisdiction. She noted the site has been approved for residential units by the County and that homes already exist in the area. She stated the zoning request is not much different than what currently exists and she felt it's impractical to require an EIR. She also felt if chemical use is a concern, it should relate to the water table and animal health as well. In response to Council Member Henderson, Ms. Aaronson confirmed there is potential for the property to be developed in or out of the City. She also asked if a 100-foot buffer is required that it be from the boundary of the use and not the property line. Bernard Debonne stated he has been farming for 40 years and questioned farmers being able to survive on small vineyards without additional income. He advised chemical spraying is usually limited to March through May with sulphur. being applied two or three times a season. He noted there are a number of existing farms contiguous to residences and stated he didn't feel chemical ,147 City Council Minutes 14 November 20, 2001 spraying is a serious argument against residential development. He felt the issue is more of a preference between two lifestyles. Mayor Pena asked how buffer zones work when houses are located in the middle or adjacent to a farm. Mr. Debonne stated he was not aware of any State or Federal law requiring buffer zones for houses. City Attorney Jenson recommended a continuance in order to have an opportunity to review the information distributed by Mr. Hargreaves. She also reviewed information received from the Agricultural Standards Investigator in Indio regarding chemicals used on Ms. Waters' vineyard and stated only one of three chemicals listed by Ms. Waters' attorney is recorded as being used. She stated dormax has a buffer zone for lemon trees up to A mile because of the reaction it causes in lemon trees but it's not applicable to residential units. She added, under State regulations, buffer zones are expected to be on the farm property and not adjacent properties. Sulphur, which is used on Ms. Waters' property, has an odor problem but no health -related issues or established buffer zones. She advised in addition to a 100-foot buffer zone, staff is recommending a 300-foot noticing requirement, which can be expanded if Council wishes. In response to Council Member Adolph, Ms. Jenson stated desert land surrounding a vineyard may be considered open space and not require a buffer. She advised under State law, if Ms. Waters is authorized by statute to utilize chemicals and has a permit, she would not be responsible for creating a nuisance situation. She further advised staff is recommending prior to annexation, that an ordinance be adopted that would give Ms. Waters protection to continue the use on her property. She stated the proposed ordinance is modeled after the County Ordinance but Ms. Waters feels it does not protect any change in crop but under the proposed ordinance the use would be protected and could not be considered a nuisance. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to continue the public hearing for NRI La Quinta Limited Partnership to December 18, 2001. In response to Council Member Henderson, Ms. Jenson stated she understood inner buffers and outer buffers are established for the chemical use, based on the calculation of the number of acres and amount of chemical used. There are restrictions whether or not the outer buffer can include adjacent properties. • • Mayor Pena suggested inviting the Agricultural Standards Investigator to attend • the December 181h meeting. 557 Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2001-165. L 4 3 • • • City Council Minutes 15 November 20, 2001 2. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER STREET NAME CHANGE 2001-012 TO CHANGE THE NAME OF A PORTION OF VIA TRIESTE TO VIA LIVORNO WITHIN LAKE LA QUINTA. APPLICANT: LAKE LA QUINTA COMMUNITIES. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. Community Development Director Herman presented the staff report. There being no requests to speak, the Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-148 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A STREET NAME CHANGE (2001-012) FOR A PORTION OF VIA TRIESTE TO VIA LIVORNO LOCATED WITHIN LAKE LA QUINTA (LAKE LA QUINTA COMMUNITIES). It was moved by Council Members Adolph/Sniff to adopt Resolution No. 2001-148 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. 3. PUBLIC HEARING TO CERTIFY A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-429; REVIEW OF AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO SPECIFIC PLAN 87-011 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-708 TO APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR A 25,240 SQUARE FOOT, TWO- STORY BUILDING FOR COMMERCIAL, RETAIL, AND OFFICE USES; AND REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-064 TO ALLOW THE USE ON APPROXIMATELY 1.78 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF AVENUE 47, WEST OF ADAMS STREET. APPLICANT: THOMAS LATHROP, LATHROP DEVELOPMENT. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. Community Development Director Herman presented the staff report. In response to Mayor Pena, Tom Lathrop, the applicant, advised the maximum height at the ridge line is 34'/2 feet. In response to Council Member Adolph, Mr. Herman advised the setback from curb is 20 + feet. 558 .j 4 9 City Council Minutes 16 November 20, 2001 There being no other requests to speak, the Mayor declared the PUBLIC • HEARING CLOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2001-429 PREPARED FOR SPECIFIC PLAN 87-011 AMENDMENT NO. 3, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-064, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-708 (LATHROP DEVELOPMENT). It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to adopt Resolution No. 2001-149 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-150 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR A COMMERCIAL OFFICE USE (SPECIFIC PLAN 87-011 AMENDMENT NO. 3 - LATHROP DEVELOPMENT). • It was moved by Council Members Henderson/Sniff to adopt Resolution No. 2001-150 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-151 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR A 25,240 SQUARE FOOT, TWO-STORY, COMMERCIAL OFFICE BUILDING (SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2001-708- LATHROP DEVELOPMENT). It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to adopt Resolution No. 2001-151 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-152 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A COMMERCIAL OFFICE USE (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-064 - LATHROP DEVELOPMENT). It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to adopt Resolution No. • 2001-152 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. • M t � e ATTACHMENT #3 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP „ cw,..r•ORN«a "..TnO .IAH.L.TT PLATNEAGn.h ImC, --DING p"oFESS.ONAL CONrC*%^T.OnS LAWYERS waTw..P . ..TTLCWOAT.- RADLCT c n:.,FE.o TETEA ocwn.E . W.-MII.]n wwA[M .� FRC[n.n a n.66.n OOTnwM . a 7e0 n.:.RwA: . I 1 . a..Ac 200 •.. D.A. WL.aC +.•rew«.- Yt..O w.Lt.•n R O.v+OafC• n. O.nnMGn v Dunw C nehpT wGL.La pwV.D . n.nCOCw Jann n.uTn+ aV6AAMAn..w POCT O►r.Ce n0X . 3GC0 .CN.RO T .n DE Rion- p Nwna.«• 'EfrRET 1Ttv[n C Da Pwuw• nwrac• E P[T[p:On .b. MC=nw GR. - YA.M- .Onw CP.0 . CnewER• ROOCR w CAww FORD C.M.C. w n.R=n...a TCLCPRO.-.Y601 500 �Onn a 6ROww T R.DOC..• OENnIL n rofA nwan D. n.a LwTT �c•rwtT B O.aa.wCcn TOLc.,n. TCLCLOPILN •%eo: Sao 06GD a M,a' R.ORMwT• P «W.F PcwwtE Mn Eb P wOARu n Thc.ee. GA.1- a whTOR.CC. Pew..w COM raC 0-4, ROaCRT W nwwoREAVE: c M. ..Ca CO-StTr ndr T COL,..0 0A 0 - wi«M r. S£A n .00 w OF CO..«..•-. OECA6L M R.'", W. PNOTD. R DR.CC a fiEACn rE.NIFLR T 6.CKAA14 a a6A...RThL., Cn A.£TOPn CR . Cw4RE.TEA u..P. DwZ60a, L .-Pp— .R.cl.c ON -TER M-Al C C.... Th..c T TRAN C A Gw ..RnRC: i- O:wew M.Cw: D nM6A.b n N..9-CT C n wauOT M.Rw . GwO TEA n.Cn E.aC OYL..eTTe Q1E. W PA.C4 M.P;M.CnAEa MCLEOD TA.C•E Pn.M wnnL T TS.OnAb DO«w.D F Z. rk- LARw CAJ.D CRW.n• •.D.E,b On• ncr.w w RAR DO.Pn C,.Th.A w GCRn.wD .MLC P TO..C,4TO.[ bTLv[n n ww0EA5OR �wGGn C CaL:= w—M .. PR.L:T cn..e 71«M a OTCR ACIOCQ n.0 •C4 t70„y„� : pw aa.re• M.RDuef.TE 6 :Tn.. O AOSERT a P-Tn:Ab Ow pww.Ga II AOBG QT= D 6A.wn GMIT7. CP COOwT n n.an...:Ow nTL[ A Z.O. PP,-. w be —RP nwAT DLTI. couuRw w.Rw W GLws TMhMM .AMES R A DTAL.z A.IM0.0 P.uu c r u[ SOw. ...Own.1ET COTT.n D' LC C. CGPecw D.NA O wwAM.o -ARE. D O.VPh r.CTOw wO.F O..w.CA w n Dew. D[RL CTh LT:. n :w.T2nwn cn.i.BTnA • wLn.. ROOCRTA I —A nowMRD O 00.PZ :ON....p.O CARVALRO .-Rco . n.Rnn" CULL . Cn.Cw6 D.nILL C :TL"VE..O. aTLPnEIa P OC.T-C. ORn o P.« CY �Onw : w.L:w wR.Lnn a rwawcr rOnn w AOTTSC—c". A'n. GT nMDwn:DntR o.G OORwe wwRtNCE nu6NG: Ern Ow. EnAE OPnee= .n R.v CAb1O[ .Too. 6e0 . ae0 v 'MICR.[►=wnGRO..A R.Cn..16 T COCER w..SOw D .LPLRT C.OPRw AnTwONO DL:T so .L.e )) ONT.R.O IDOO) ve.. ef.8e SCUTf C. 'nIT11 R CL.Pnc, u•. rp.Rw c wOAM: w.a..w.. ^OOO nLRR.61 w..a nww' -Z. C Tux.tTcoER . . ]-. DTO. yo0.• -A « P•CCO'O. O. e_e =3u0 ,ORw«.e �wcw LEWI:- wILL..n O Owna.wG �A. n.enwea O DOuew Lucenc eEiT I. bG] -A PAuFESSIONAL C0h FOAATIOR June 26, 2001 VL9 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION Honorable Chairman and Commission Members Planning Commission, City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92270 Re, E'nvironmxntal Assessment 2001-418, General Plan Amendment 200I-077, and Zone Change 2001-100 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Commission. This office represents William and Madeline Waters with respect to the above -referenced maner The Waters, through Romad Investments LP, own the 40 acre vineyard at the corner of Avenue 53 and Monroe that is a portion of the land subject to the proposed general plan amendment, zone change, and potential annexation. The Waters have not requested that their property be part of the annexation, and unless their concerns are addressed, will object to the re -zoning, general plan amendment, and annexation as a threat to the continuance of their agricultural operation The Waters' property is classified as prime agricultural land and is currently cultivated in 40 acres of high quality table grapes, in which the Waters have made a substantial investment It is the desire of the Waters to continue commercial agricultural operations on their land. It is our understanding That under the proposed zoning, the Waters vineyard would be "grandfaThered" as a pre-existing, non -conforming use The Waters would be able to continue the 560 vineyard indefinitely, but would be unable to make any substantial change in the operation. New farm LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KMEGER Lt.P Honorable Chairman and Commission Members City of La Quinta Planning Commission June 26, 2001 Page 2 related structures would not be permitted, nor would a change of crop, or possibly even a replanting of the existing grapes Even more troubling is the threat to the Waters' agricultural operation if residential development is permitted on adjoining property without the necessary measures to buffer the inherently incompatible land uses. Farming operations on the Waters' property generate impacts typical of large scale farming operations Heavy machinery may operate at all hours of the day and nigh[, as cultivation practices demand These operations generate significant levels of noise and dust Applications ofagricultural chemicals such as sulfur, herbicides and pesticides create inevitable strong odors. On particularly cold nights, helicopters may be employed at low altitudes to stir up the air and prcvcnt freezing. Organic ferrilizers may be employed that generate their own objectionable odors Workers travel to and from the property, and engage in work on the property, at all hours of the day and night, generating additional traffic and noise While the applicant of the proposed general plan amendment and re -Zoning has not disclosed Elie nature of[he contemplated development, it is our understanding that the applicant is the developer of the nearby Country Club of the Desert The intention appears to be to extend the Country Club of the Desert development into the annexation area. The likely outcome will be to line the borders of the.WaTers' vineyard with median density, country -club housing These residences would likely be marketed to retired seniors, who undoubtedly anticipate enjoying the peace, quiet and fresh air of the rural Coachella Valley The reality of living in close proximity to a large scale agricultural operation will not fit in with the lifestyles that the retirees anticipate Unless appropriate buffering and notice provisions are required of adjacent residential development, conflicts will inevitably arise between the Waters' agricultural operations and their new neighbors that will render agricultural operations more and more difficult Prime agricultural land is being lost to development nationwide at the alarming rate of 1,o00,000 acres annually The loss of prime agricultural land, both in Riverside County and California as a whole, is of strong concern to policy makers at all levels of government. In attempting to address this concern, the State of California has enabled Williamson Act Agricultural Preserves (Government Code § 51200 eta.), Agricultural Protective Zoning (Government Code § 6647 4), and Right -to -Farm Laws (Civil Code § 3480, eJ. 5gq ) The Report of the California Commission on Local Governance for the 21 st Century strongly encourages all LAF'COs to adopt strong agricultural land protection policies. The Riverside County General Plan notes that agricultural production is the County's largest industry In order to arrest the decline ofproductive agricultural lands, the Riverside County General Plan provides that 561 KMrL1B-Jk%%"1846U4 �,t 5 2 LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRiEGER LLP Honorable Chairman and Commission Members City of La Quinta Planning Commission June 26, 2001 Page 3 "The county will encourage the retention and enhancement of existing productive agricultural lands by requiring compatible land uses adjacent to them In some cases, the protection of existing productive agricultural lands will require that proposed land uses near such agricultural lands provide buffer areas adjacent to agricultural areas to create a transition between agricultural uses and higher intensity development." (General Plan, p 378.) "The county shall utilize land use buffers between existing productive agricultural lands and other, incompatible land uses. Buffer requirements will be established on a community basis and be reflective of the unique conditions that exist in that area " (General Plan, p 380 ) "Incompatible urban development adjacent to productive agricultural land shall be discouraged." (General Plan, p.384 ) "Duffer areas must be provided between existing productive agricultural land uses and other, incompatible land uses, when necessary " (General Plan, p 384.) The Waters will object to annexation into the City of La Quinta unless similar buffer -area requirements are imposed on adjoining development. The Coral Mountain Project was required to provide a 500 ft. buffer along its southern boundary to buffer residential development from an adjoining vineyard. The Waters respectfully request that similar buffers be required for residential projects adjoining their vineyard Furthermore, they request that notice of the impacts of agricultural operations be required to be given to potential purchasers of residences within one -quarter (1 /4) mile of the vineyard The CEQA documentation submitted to support the proposed re -zoning and general plan amendment is inadequate because it fails to acknowledge and address potential impacts of development that is contemplated by this application Neither the staff report nor the environmental assessment honestly describe the nature of contemplated project Both refer only to the re -zoning and general plan amendment Neither acknowledges that this is the first step in a process contemplated to result in the extension of the Country Club of the Desert project into the annexation area. CEQA requires that the environmental impact analysis define the project as broadly as possible to incorporate the whole contemplated project (Citizens Association for Sensible ► %&US\R %k%%] "6w ern 53 I.Aw OFFICIES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP Honorable Chairman and Commission Members City of La Quinta Planning Commission June 26, 2001 Page 4 Deve oRment ofBlshop Area v. County of lnv_o (1985) 172 Cal. App 3d 151). CEQA does not allow a project to be studied in smaller segments that might diminish project impacts In this case, the general plan amendment and re -zoning of this area is obviously a pre -cursor to the development proposal that will identify the actual project The environmental assessment attempts to defer the site's specific environmental analysis to the project approval stage. Segmenting the environmental review process into two stages in this manner is not permitted. Ifthe actual project is known at this time, the project must be identified and its impacts analyzed if no specific project is contemplated, then no general plan amendment and zone change is needed at this time Bceause of the segmented nature of environmental review, the project's potential impacts on agricultural lands are underestimated The proposed extension of the Country Club of the Desert, as well as other proposed and approved residential projects in the area, will have a substantial impact on existing agricultural uses. These impacts need to be studied and addressed in a comprehensive manner. The pending general plan update process by the City of La Quinta provides the appropriate planning vehicle. This project should be deferred until the issues of agricultural preservation can be addressed in a comprehensive manner throughout the whole area. Similarly, the project contemplated by this application will inevitably exacerbate the groundwater overdraft situation. Everyone is aware that the groundwater basin underlying this area is in an overdraft situation Water levels are lowering in wells throughout the area The Coachella Valley Water District is in the process of developing and implementing plans to address the overdraft, but to date, there is no resolution in place Necessary additional sources of water have not been sition will become increasingly more difficult as urban, agricultural and acquired, and their acqui environmental uses compete for California's diminishing water supply. Furthermore, to date, there is no established way to recharge the ground water to the extent that will be necessary to offset the demands of increa3ed residential construction In a recent meeting of the Planning Commission of Riverside County, the Riverside County hydrologist acknowledged that a similar project, the Coral Mountain Project, would inevitably exacerbate the ground water overdraft. The residential project contemplated by this re -zoning would have a similar impact Until this problem is acknowledged and addressed in a comprehensive manner, it is bad policy, and legally impermissible, to continue to approve residential projects in a piecemeal fashion, without full CEQA review. The Waters respectfully request that this application be put on hold pending a comprehensive review of agricultural preservation and groundwater issues If the City is intent on going forward at this point, at a minimum, the Waters request that the City enter into a pre-annexarion agreement that guarantees the current agricultural zoning for their property indefinitely; that an appropriate 500 foot 54 K%WVJh t*'M134W4 LAw oFFiCES of F.JEST BF-ST & KRIEGER LLP Honorable Chairman and Commission Members City of La Quinta Planting Commission June 26, 2001 Page 5 buffer be required from any adjoining residential uses; and that developers be required to give purchasers of residences within one -quaver (1/4) mile notice regarding the potential impacts of agricuhural operations Robert W Hargre ves of BEST BEST &_' .IFG R LLP RWH.dm cc. William and Madeline Waters 564 153 RWUB\RW"lf*" 'JUL-0---L`J1 11:59H FROM: T0:977712 ? P: 12 ` BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS A TNUR L. LITTLEWOPTH- WILLIAM P. OEWOLFC' AICHARO T. ANDERSON• JOHN D. WAHLIN• JOHN E. BPOWN MICNAEL T RIDO ELL' M IC MRCL GRANT* FRANC I5 J BAUM' OEORGE M REYES• WILLIAM W. FLOYD. JP G RE00 RY L. HAROKE KCMDAIt N MAOVEY C LARN N, ALSO OA VIO J. ERWIN• MICNAEL J. ANOCLSON' DOUOLAS S. PHILLIPS- OREGORY K. WILKINSON GENE TANAKA VICTOR L. WOLF OAHICL E. OLIVICR HOWARD B. GOLDS STEPHEN P. OEITSCH JOHN R, ROTTSCHAErCR MARTIN A. MUELLER J. MICMAEL SUMMEAOUR SCOTT C SMITH JACK 0. CLARK E. .1A. BRIAN M. LEWIG' BRAOLCY E NEUFCLO PCTER M BARMACK JEFFREY V. DUNN STEVEN C O&a AUN- ERIC L. GARNER• DENNIS M. COTA P M.W F PEARCE ROBEAT W HARORCAVCS C. MICMAEL COWETT BRUCE W BEACH ARLENE PRATER MARK A. EASTER MICHELLE 0 ELLCTTE KEVIN K. PANDOLPH CYNTHIA M. GCRMANO MARGUERITE S. STRAND KYLE A. SNOW JAMES B GILPIN KIM A. BYRENS OCAN DERLETH SONIA RUBIO CARVALHO JOHN O. PINKNCY. PIEAO C OALLAROA DWIGHT M. HOMTOOM ERY RICMAPD T EOOCR FRANKLIN C ADAMS WILLIAM WOOD MERRILL WILLIAM O DAMLINO. JR. 'A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92270 LAWYERS BERNIE L. WILLIAKSON O. HENRY WCLLES DAVID J HANCOCK HAYLEY C. PCTCR30H ROGER N. CAAWrORO S HAW14 D. HAGCRTY JAMCS P MORRIS KEVIN T. COLLINS DAYIO W. NCWMAN JENNIICR T BUCKMAN MARIA C. GLESS GLEN W. PRICE MARYMICHACL MCLEOD JAMES R. TOUCHSTONE STCVEN M. ANDERSON ROBERT L. PATTEPSON BRYAN K. BERARD JAMEE L. RAYMOND ►AULA CLIP BE SOUSA LYSA M. SALTZNAH MARCO A. 14ARTINCZ JOHN F. WALSH JEFFRY F. FERAE OORINE LAWRCNCE-NUGHES ALISON O. ALPERT KRISHAN S. CHOPPA JAMES C. TURNEY MICMAEL D DOLIDA ..PC" M "CCMAN JOHN D MIOOIN DOTIAM MALATHY SUBRAMANIAN USI MESHRCKY ORAIO M MARS MALL JCFTRCY S. BALLINGER M. TIERESA TOLENT NO TNEACSA C ANTONUCCI MELISSA W_ WOO E.SEAN ARTHCR TRANO T TIP — CARMEN MARTNCZ Cc 03ABA TRACK PMAM JASON C. OLESS WILLIAM J. PRIEST DANICL S. ROBERTS MARY BETE COBURN LINDSEY A, COTTAM OAMICLLE C GERBER CHRISTINA A. HENRY ELISE L- CHENO KRISTIN C VARNER TAM B. TRAN DANIEL C. KATZ RAYMOND BEST 11 000' 1057) JAMES M. KRIEGER (I G I J• 19 l UOEHE BEST (1 893- 1 Ga k{ 7n TOO HIGHWAY I I 1 Su1TE 200 INDIAN WELLS. CALIFORNIA 02210 POST OFFICE BON I pO DO PALM OCSCRT. CALIFORNIA OZCS.T TELEPHONC (700) 506,2011 TELECOPIER 1700/ 340 OOGO BOKLAW.COM OF COUNSEL CHAISTGPMCR L CARPCHTCR MICHACL D. HARRIS- ANNE T TNONIS DONALD F. LIMNER• CHP15TINA L OYER D BRIAN REIDER KIRK W. SMITH OIMA O. HAR-S WARREN B. OIVEN ROBERT.) HANNA DANIEL G. STCVENSON OFFICE'+ IN RIVERSIDE /0O91 000 1 430 ONTARIO 10001 GB0 SSB4 SAN DIEGO 10191 3;5-1 300 ORANGE 17141 030SG.O REC',NED July 3, 2001 20 z o JUL 3 � Re: Environmental Assessment 2001-418, General Plan Amendment 2001-077, and Zone Change 2001-100 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: This letter is in addition to my letter of June 26, 2001 which I understand has been provided to you as part of the Council Agenda packet. In the interest of brevity, I will not repeat the information in the letter, but add the following additional information in opposition to the proposed environmental assessment, general plan amendment, and zone change. I. The Proposed Annexation is Incompatible With Continuation of Commercial Agricultural Operations Due to concerns regarding the impact ofannexation into the City on their ongoing agricultural operations, the Waters request that their property not be included within the annexation area. Until such time as the City ofLa Quinta develops agricultural zoning and policies and standards to preserve the integrity of agricultural operations, the Waters feel that their vineyard is best left in the County, where such uses are welcome and protected. P WUB\RWff 184958 5 5.5 50 07-30-01 11:49 RECEIVED FROM: P•02 JUL- cl-C4,I_n_i1 .11: 59a FROM: TJ:47771'= P:= 1 LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST S KRIEGER LLP Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council July 3, 2001 Page 2 Additionally, the Waters request that if the annexation of the remaining property is to go forward, that a 500 foot buffer be required between residential housing developments and ongoing commercial agricultural operations, and that residential owners within one -quarter mile be given notice of the agricultural operations. As Ms. Waters testified before the Planning Commission, commercial agricultural operations are incompatible with residential uses. The use of heavy machinery and helicopters at all hours of the day and night, commercial pesticides, organic fertilizers, and bird bombs will undoubtedly be a source of constant irritation to neighboring seniors. If adequate buffers and notices are not provided, conflicts between neighbors will inevitably arise. The City cannot in good conscience, or as a matter of good planning, allow residential neighborhoods to be developed immediately adjacent to the commercial agricultural operations. U. The Environmental Assessment and Proposed Negative Declaration Fail to Acknowledge Significant impacts As noted in my June 26"' letter, the CEQA documentation prepared to support the application is inadequate because it fails to fully acknowledge and address the cumulative impacts of the proposed project and current and likely future projects. l . Loss Of Agricultural Land Is A Significant Impact. The checklist incorporated into Environmental Assessment 2001418, with respect to agricultural resources, states: "a. Convert prime farmland, unique farmland, No impact. or farmland of statewide importance (farmland) to non-agricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for No impacat. agricultural use, or a WilliarDson Act contract? c. Involve other changes in the existing Less than significant impact. environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of farmland to non-agricultural use?" The addendum for the environmental assessment states: "II.(c) Portions of the annexation area have been in agriculture for sometime. Annexation of the land, and the imposition of land use designations, will not impact the agricultural use of the land. In the 566 IUvVLJB\RVJMI94958 157 07-30-01 11:49 RECEIVED FROM: P-03 iUL-. 0-2'_,0Ol -12: OOP FROM: TO: 9 r 7 7 1237 LAW OFFJCES of BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council July 3, 2001 Page 3 long term, however, the land will be developed in low density residential land uses. This development will result in the loss of 240 acres of agriculture in the Valley. The land is not currently under Williamson Act contract, and as an isolated parcel surrounded by approved residential development, does not represent a significant agricultural parcel. The loss of this land will be less than significant." P: 4- 12 To the contrary, preservation of prime agricultural land is an important concern of the State ofCalifornia and the County of Riverside. Nevertheless, the environmental assessment dismisses the loss of 240 acres as "insignificant". Furthermore, it became clear during the Planning Commission hearing that a substantial part of the annexation is subject to Williamson Act contract. The loss of these lands cannot be considered "insignificant". The City of La Quinta has no policies regarding agricultural preservation, no agricultural zoning, and no standards for mitigating land use incompatibilities between agricultural and residential uses. Unless the City plans in a comprehensive manner for agricultural preservation, it will become increasingly difficult to continue agricultural operations within the City, and loss of prime farmland will become inevitable. This cumulative impact cannot be considered "insignificant". 2. The Project Will Negatively Impact Groundwater Resources. With respect to hydrology and water quality, the checklist states: "b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table. (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells that drop to'a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted.)." Less than significant impact. The addendum acknowledges that "all development adds to demand for groundwater". However, as the project will be required to meet the City's water -conservation standards, the EA concludes that "these mitigation measures will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level". Once again, the assessment fails to view the issues in the larger context ofcumulative impacts. Residential development of the annexation area will inevitably place an additional burden on the R 0US\R W] \ ] 63958 56� .5� 07-30-01 11:50 RECEIVED FROM: P.04 '12: 01P FR0N: T0:9 171c. = P : 5 `1c LAW OFFICES of BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council July 3, 2001 Page 4 overdrafted water table. Under current standards, residential uses are served by water pumped from ground water. The engineering firm for the nearby Coral Mountain Project analyzed the water supply demands of that project, which is a country club/residential development similar in nature to what can be anticipated in the annexed area. They calculated that the development would contribute an additional average demand of 1.8 acre feet per acre per year on the groundwater. (See PACE letter dated June 7, 20001, attached as Exhibit "I"). Assuming that the proposal now before the City ultimately generates a similar demand, there would be an additional demand of 430 acre feet (1.8 x 240) on the groundwater. Assuming an average porosity of25%, the water table in the vicinity could drop an additional 7 feet per year. That additional demand, when added to the additional demands imposed by other approved and projected projects, will have a significant impact on the groundwater basin. Both Mrs. Waters, and other neighboring properties, have reported that the water levels in their wells have been dropping for years. The draft Coachella Valley Water Management Plan (which is available at ww-vv. L--N wd. ora) states that groundwater demand in the lower valley currently exceeds recharge by 41,700 acre feet per year (page 3-17), and that groundwater levels have decreased 60 feet or more in some parts of the lower valley (page 2). (See also CVWD Annual Review 2000, excerpt attached as Exhibit "2", regarding the overdraft.) The draft Water Management Plan states that "it is clear that the continued decline of groundwater levels is unacceptable" (page 2-3). The draft Plan notes that "the continued overdraft will have serious consequences for the Coachella Valley Short term impacts include increased groundwater pumping costs, and the cost of deepening wells and installing larger pumps. "Continued decline of groundwater levels could result in a substantial and possibly irreversible degradation of water quality in the groundwater basins" (page 1-2). Areas of the lower Coachella Valley are already experiencing subsidence caused by excessive groundwater -pumping. The dropping ofthe water level in the aquifer can cause compaction such that the capacity of the aquifer is diminished. Even if additional water becomes available, the ability of the aquifer to store water will be diminished. The draft Water Management Plan notes that the Coachella Valley does not currently have water rights to imported water sufficient to satisfy its current and future demands. While CVWD has done an outstanding job in attempting to acquire additional sources, those efforts have not yet reached fruition. The ability of the Coachella Valley to acquire the needed additional sources of water imports is not assured as water situation in California becomes evermore critical, with urban, agriculture and the environment competing for additional sources at the same time that the State is 568 RWUB\R'AnI94958 153 07-30-01 11:51 RECEIVED FROM: P•05 JUL-_70-`001 12: 01P FRO[1: T0: 9 i f i 1c�^ F': r 1 LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council July 3, 2001 Page 5 under directive from the Secretary of Interior to reduce its use of Colorado River Water by nearly 1,000,000 acre feet annually. Even if CVWD is able to acquire the necessary additional supplies, it is not clear that the aquifer underlying the lower valley can be successfully recharged. As noted in the draft Management Plan, "the maximum amount of potential recharge in the lower valley is not known at this time" (page 5-15), With the approval of this project, and other similar projects, the current overdraft of the groundwater will be exacerbated. Water levels in wells will drop faster. The long term damage to the aquifer is unknown, and the ability to acquire resources to recharge the aquifer is uncertain. Consequently, the incremental increase on groundwater overdraft caused by the proposed project cannot be considered "less than significant.". 3. Traffic Impacts Are Not Acknowledged. With respect to traffic generation, the environmental assessment notes: "The ultimate development of the subject property will result in fewer trips than under the County General Plan Designation, insofar as the City Land Use Designation proposed does not allow as many residential units as does the County. Furthermore, the build -out ofthe project will result in improvements on both Avenue 52 and Monroe which will improve circulation in the area. The impact of build -out of the annexation area is not expected to be significant." The assessment once again fails to acknowledge the true impact. The land is currently in agriculture. The proposed general plan amendment, zoning and annexation is intended to facilitate residential development. That residential development will undoubtedly generate more traffic than the current open space, sod farm, and vineyard that currently occupy the area. The magnitude of that impact needs to be evaluated. That impact, in conjunction with anticipated projects in the vicinity, will undoub&dly be significant unless mitigated. 4. Cumulative Impacts Are Not Addressed. In Section VII, Mandatory Findings of Significance, the checklist provides: "c. Does the project have impacts that are Less than significant. individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("cumulatively, considerable" means that incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.)?" 5 s 9 RNdFLWVnT164958 .j VI6 1 07-30-01 11:51 RECEIVED FROM: P-06 .TUL-:) -L10- 91-12:02P FROM: TO: 1 I IZ33 P: i lc LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council July 3, 2001 Page 6 The City of La Quinta is one of the fastest growing cities in the nation. In the last few years, the City and County have approved a number of developments on the eastern boundary of the City that encroach into established agricultural areas, including Country Club of the Desert, Citrus, PIantation, Norman Course, Travertine, Quarry, Khol Ranch, etc. Thousands of additional housing units have already been approved within several miles of the proposed project, and thousands more will likely be approved in the future. As noted above, the residential development facilitated by the current project will have negative impacts on prime farmland, groundwater overdraft, and traffic. Each additional project imposes additional impacts on these scarce and precious resources. The cumulative impact of these projects on the preservation ofagricultural land and the groundwater basin have not been assessed. Both the City of La Quinta and the County of Riverside are currently undergoing general plan update processes. The City of.La Quinta has announced its intention to plan the entire area along its eastern boundary as far east as the Khol Ranch. The County is also updating its plan for this area. Before any additional developments are approved in this area, it makes sense that the issues of agricultural preservation and groundwater protection are studied in a comprehensive manner so that the cumulative impacts can be assessed, alternatives considered and mitigation strategies developed. 5. Mitigation Measures Are Not Implemented. The Environmental Assessment finds that the proposed project will cause significant impacts on biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, and noise, unless mitigated. The attached addendum specifies a number of mitigation measures. Staff proposes the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. However, there does not appear to be any mechanism specified for implementing the proposed mitigation measures_ As there is no specific project proposed at this time, there is no project on which to impose the proposed conditions. Neither the general plan amendment nor the zone change are conditioned on implementation of any of the mitigation measures (which would likely be inappropriate in any case)_ Consequently, there is no effective way to effectuate the mitigation measures, and adoption of a mitigated negative declaration is inappropriate. III. Conclusion The Environmental Assessment assumes that residential development of the annexation property is inevitable and that the incremental loss of farmland is not significant. This will become a self-fulfilling prophecy. If affirmative steps are not taken to protect agricultural uses, farms and equestrian uses will be forced from the area. If La Quinta intends to develop in a manner that is consistent with preserving farm and equestrian uses for property owners that want to continue to pursue those uses, which uses in the past have contributed significantly both to the local economy and the desert quality of life, then appropriate planning needs to occur now. RMPUBIR�Vn] 84958 07-30-61 11:52 RECEIVED FROM: P•07 :�� P:='1 JUL-._cl-,�001. 1� ZP FROM: CAW OFFICES OF BEST 6EST b, KRIEGER LLP Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council July 3, 2001 Page 7 In order to protect the Waters vineyard, the Waters respectfully request that their property not be included within the annexation area, and that appropriate buffer and notice mitigation measures be imposed to offset the inevitable land use incompatibility. RWH: dm cc: William and Madeline Waters 571 62 RNIPUB1RWMI84958 fa7—'IN—A1 11:53 RECEIVED FROM: P'08 TU:7771c P:'+'1 JUL-3i*"i-�Clo1 '12: C3P FROH: �'I'r c tom— -4 -µ —t i rt 06 19/Fool lE �38 FA3 a 38838 i 1:11en LtuJa frover g. 7-cl; 3:330u:vAaw p/��CSF[C �pV/►ptC6D CML. ■NOSNEE/�IN'O. 1l�tC- 1 7soe GEORGETOWN LANE HUNTINGTON BEAM+ !J►L.1FafW1A 02647 20 17ML: 71,"4aZ734 . PAX: 71 4; 4E"O I%= 7. ZOQl ?&_ Dave Twc& SShes Somas fill Alive Adulb 41405 DardwIlk. Ste. Lu paint Danes% CA 92211 Rs- Ccrui Mounadnardomy as Ls Quissta Project Tract #3OM Res900- ED PWming Ca=n'rsaoa Cot ==t No. 1 mini Of Aw ROO Dear Mr. Twcd -. en2M Wv ha-" Teviowed the p�ropowd pzo1c� demands and ptcgaced ffic following wnswnpdw um ar+s�61i: torabtg water zk=WA, or" m Ate drer) 1.203 s isWo Fam ly Aotiw Ades$ Rrsidmm � �am Poo of c�b5o� An%*d r ester wad PALM v Total -- y" Sinsw FamAy Vgift (at US Film" Per do per to m APUMAL UMAM! 391 TE$T POTAXX WATIM P%Potwe Domm da Mrom CA.P.) " Golf course & i eadseape "sa6oA 118 aft," ass 1"airiag iftiou ion 75 acres not saiaeedla:Z0dS isedVA* irsi$WOn Tors! —1 55 seas let" inclms per,wi ANNUAL DEPALOW1 1y41 ACRE NCOLPMA•BLT VATZR 57^ Exhibit 1'Of 163 07-30-01 11-53 RECEIVED FROM: P-99 JUL-._�-`U-1t-11' 12:t._;F' FRLiP1: T0:y77712 P:1t_- 12 . ...��.r_.�.......�_�r,�.-, rnn dun. 14C3 e{0101 #d1:JfF'f1 r3 r W11/2001 i2:50 FAX 760 3983071 311en Lloyd Troyer CUUU Mr• Daw TWedt JUAC 7, 2001 Tr9iov at La Qniuta Page Z of 2 As iadiratod abavm wad ns shown en the attached graphs the Ptoiod amuml wdu dam nd frow the aquifer is 391 awc Bost and will we 1,391 tare feet of C.A.P. VNW fix arigstiae tad nm-Porable usm. We have reviowW tho March 27, 2001 Mutes tom C'VWD m W DW PWk MP( tg the D;su'zes -/ capacity to Supply waw w the ptaposed projte4 and as §rAod is the leVAM 'LW9 WE sorV'dMt dug OWN it a Sgpvfaer sWly of wares to dldr aqa* to aeranteaRodmv tb�a *Vdq xf and the nsr of lira YaU* for CvWD has prqu d a draft t nv=d W&W AM96 01 Plan oa threw amd sdMtn'vW grvm"=r fiaand Surhr.0 Wasat ad6P forte artd we weary demands Within ft `lallry. 'Part at plan provides far wad mandat" water mitigstWU end water conaary eS UW Migner, end ie =cti as.1t marling and proposed developmmstts. Nmuat= =dMws wl apply to the proposed Trilogy at La Qvinta WOO= such as: Mcrim9ae Use at CAP. weer far ii'rigatEao: • In addition to the use of CAP. watts for mige = of tits proposed gulf aowve,.! +0 P!OJea .vial i[t'igat~ CCU=,;, ='M rvadWW am +&k'famjlY resi dense front yard landscaping with C.A.P. wafer. �. Golf Course turf scow limitaotion and tsse ofmove W9W act =vmgveSSac'n iA golf course turd ofhar (rvadwsY Medians, vaaa =11 tar a and evidences) laadscapad rear 3. Use of wow cenamittgplumbing (shower heads, toiicts. Gw•)• Ir1 addition m corfotmizrg tin the CVWD Wav Maaafem=t Plan via tlae above Warns eons="V twgtxiresnants, the "Osed Psrysdwii: squire leaf potable w&w em a eaaveatiamal wen W restricted caffununiv by vim= of the Gomm== ra 169da012. I. Smaller resi races (sppwrimmly 2,W0 to 2,2W squAT= foot homes) v fdt $wor PIumbing fiact n; thm =veal wid non-ap rF7CW 00mmVU11192- 2. Reduced Per residence potable Wa= demand based upon the smaller per capita faatily Unit csdmatn of 1.9 Papot per hQ=' we will 0011finute our review and praeent additional findings at the June 20, 2001 hearing W d make oaraalym aysibbk for questions and clarifications at the: =w. Sincerely, PACMC ADVANCED CIVIL ENGMLRINCY, EWC, Mark L Kt Preside heZ "Iff Bhcl. i'_ 19329�5-� �+�-artwa�Lerrsrsldeul3'w�dt b 6-7 01.dae 57.q 64 07-30-01 11:53 RECEIVED FROM: P•16 -TUL- 0-E!:1 11 ' 1c:04P FROM: 00:13/loos 12:37 F.93 760 3983971 Ellen Lloyd Trover • a- 1-ni : 3:53PM;PAC9 TO : 97771233 F' : 11 . 12 .iW .• 4u 4Vua Vl JV('1.1 (-4 IM U D ;v-aa+s+oaa . tr a Iola ams dedicated (no water) • - _ _ ''1:b;acns h"IngdevatcpM8Mt mi.-housirg area 293.2 at= ;role supply rq Irn� uaiurlit }units am - ' IS aonstuRn - sdddbnal facift* =eass :.._ _�.�_..... '�45,O00 acres of units a4uatad 20 units tat ad ,Rftduntt 1= total pateble use 391 AF/yr potable mfunit area i.8 AFntnlyr non-Paubw5upply , . - Irri�afian `(tnct+ssN�} otf CCU" turf area 1; °awee additional i 'on area - i'3aGr86 uz G s 1473 sass IIWn am scree 81 �re5 stress laedsaapins tatai mwpotable use 1391 AFtyr non- Wunit W" 4.7 AFiacigr ul 6j 07-30-01 11:54 RECEIVED FROM: P-11 -.TUL-_U-2!nO1'12:04F' FROM: _ "8 F_Ar i88 388Js :!ten �1c-d ?r!�ier 08`13i200I lE:� - g_ 7-0 3'S30u:2^CE TO: 9777123�3 F':12 1 ,•a3c?22 * �/ '� i 57r; 0 07-30-01 11:54 RECEIVED FROM: P•12 Tittt 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: Public Hearing on: 1) Certification of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact; 2) Specific Plan 2002-056, and 3) Site Development Permit 2002-731; a Request for a 16,042 Square Foot Retail Medical Office Complex, and Construction of one of two Medical Office Buildings on 1.51 Acres, Located ± 200 Feet North of Lake La Quinta Drive, on the East Side of Washington Street. Applicant: WG Properties, LLC. RECOMMENDATION: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-448; and 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council establishing Design Guidelines and Development Standards for a ± 16,000 square foot commercial/office complex for Specific Plan 2002-056; and 3. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving development plans for the construction of a ± 16,000 square foot commercial/office complex for Site Development Permit 2002-731 . FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The 1.51 acre project site has no history of development proposals, and is located ± 200 feet north of Lake La Quinta Drive, on the east side of Washington Street (Attachment 1). It was originally mapped as part of a larger parcel under Tentative Tract 24230, approved in 1989. Subsequently, this particular parcel was created under Parcel Map 27892 in 1994. As a result of prior grading activity associated with 576 Tract 24230 and its improvements, the site is barren of vegetation and any topographic relief or features. Project Proposal The applicant proposes a 16,042 square foot commercial office project. The initial building (Phase 1) is intended as medical office space of 8,792 square feet. The second phase building site is an 8,000 s.f. pad which will house a 6,500 s.f. general office building, according to the Specific Plan document. The two buildings, therefore, actually total 15,292 square feet. The premise of the application presents a Specific Plan for review of design guidelines and development standards on the overall project development. The Site Development Permit is proposed for the construction of the 8,792 s.f. Phase 1 medical office building, which includes the necessary on and off - site improvements for that use. The Phase 2 area will be planted and maintained to mitigate blowing dust and effect a presentable appearance pending ultimate development. Building A (Phase 1 building) is oriented to the northeast corner of the parcel. The roof line incorporates an alternating flat parapet and mansard treatment, with rounded cornices at the top of the main roof lines. The main building roof line is 20 feet high. Two hip roof elements extend the highest roof peak to 26 and 30 feet. The 30-foot element is approximately 90 feet from the Washington Street R.O.W. The building architecture utilizes smooth texture plaster walls and columns, solar bronze glass with darkened aluminum moulding and rough sawn outriggers. Color tones for building surfaces are in shades of brown, used to accent outriggers, roof edges and other portions of the building elevation. No exterior light fixtures are shown. Building Height - The CR district allows building heights of four stories, up to 50 feet, but limits building height to 22 feet for structures within 150 feet of any Primary Image Corridor and Major or Primary Arterials, as designated in the General Plan. The Specific Plan proposes that the Phase 1 building height be permitted to peak at 30 feet within 150 feet of Washington Street. The building has a peak roof height of 30 feet associated with a tower gable hip roof at the west end of the building. From the Washington Street R.O.W., this element exceeds the 22 foot height limit starting at a linear distance of 87 feet at it's closest point, increasing to 93 feet moving south along the roof edge (Attachment 2). Relation to Lake La Quinta residential - The project lies west of existing residential areas of the Lake La Quinta project. At its closest point, the project is about 350 feet from the nearest residential unit. The current finished grade of these homes varies approximately 2-3 feet below the proposed pad grade of the project site, which will be similar to the existing pad elevation. Access - The Specific Plan provides access to Washington Street and Caleo Bay. Washington Street access is shown to be a shared configuration with the northerly property, which is currently in review for a 25,500 s.f. medical office facility. This will be restricted to right turns in/out, and is consistent with access guidelines of the 577 o (' 2 General Plan. There are three separate access points to Caleo Bay, which is a local street with no minimum driveway separations specified in the General Plan. Parking - Based on the Specific Plan document, the overall project requires 74 spaces. This assumes the Phase 2 building at 6,500 s.f. of general office (site plan shows 8,000 s.f., Page 3 of the Specific Plan indicates 7,250 s.f.), and the Phase 1 building as a medical office. The site plan* proposed provides 74 spaces. Signs - Sign guidelines included in the Specific Plan document are minimal and relate to letter size. There is nothing inconsistent with City sign requirements. Individual tenant signs will require separate approvals. The conditions address the requirements for sign approval processing. Public Notice These cases were advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on June 8, 2002. All property owners within 500 feet of the site were mailed a copy of the public hearing notice as required. No negative comments have been received. Any correspondence received before the meeting will be transmitted to the City Council. Architecture and Landscape Review Committee At the April 3, 2002 ALRC meeting, one of the Committee members was absent and another was determined to be within 500 feet of the project site. Therefore, no recommendation was forwarded to the Planning Commission. Planning Commission The Planning Commission, at its May 28, 2002 meeting, recommended approval of the project applications to the City Council (Attachment 3). The Commission discussed the following issues: A. Use of the Specific Plan process for varying development standards such as height limits. B. Building height and appearance, relating to the peak building heights of 30 and 26 feet of the hip roof elements. The Commission recommended the building height as proposed for Phase 1 at 30 feet, as provided for in the Specific Plan (22 feet is required under the Zoning Code, within 150 feet of Washington Street), but limited Phase 2 height to 22 feet. C. Access, as it relates to the trash enclosure and three parking spaces in the northeast corner of the site, and pertaining to the three access drives proposed along Caleo Bay. No modifications were made to the access configuration. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: Findings necessary for approval of each application, in accordance with the 5 78 OC3 recommendation of the Planning Commission, can be found in the respective Resolutions to be adopted for these cases. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-448; and, Adopt a Resolution of the City Council establishing Design Guidelines and Development Standards for a ± 16,000 square foot commercial/office complex for Specific Plan 2002-056; and, Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving development plans for the construction of a ± 16,000 square foot commercial/office complex for Site Development Permit 2002-731; or, 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-448; and, Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council establishing Design Guidelines and Development Standards for a ± 16,000 square foot commercial/office complex for Specific Plan 2002-056; and, Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving development plans for the construction of a ± 16,000 square foot commercial/office complex for Site Development Permit 2002-731, or, 3. Continue the Hearing to a date specific; or, 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully s/mitted, ry Herr fen nmunity Development Director roved for submis ion y: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Specific Plan and Site Development Permit Exhibits (Council only) 2. Location Map 5 ,7 3. Phase 1 building location relative to 150' height buffer 4. Planning Commission Minutes; May 28, 2002 A..I C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\SpO56\reports\ccrptspO56.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-448, SPECIFIC PLAN 2002-056, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-731 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-448 WG PROPERTIES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 18th day of June, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation from the Planning Commission on Environmental Assessment 2002- 448, for Specific Plan 2002-056 and Site Development Permit 2002-731, a request by WG Properties to develop a ± 16,000 square foot commercial/office complex on a 1.51 acre site, located ± 200 feet north of the intersection of Lake La Quinta Drive and Washington Street, more particularly described as: PARCEL 6 OF PM 27892, PM 182/063 OF MAPS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 28th day of May, 2002 (as continued from April 23rd, 2002 and May 14th, 2002), hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider said Environmental Assessment and, at said hearing, did recommend certification of said Environmental Assessment; and, WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment complies with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended, City Council Resolution 83-63, in that the Community Development Director did conduct an Initial Study, and determined that the proposed Specific Plan 2002-056 and Site Development Permit 2002-731 could not have a significant adverse impact on the environment, and that a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following findings to justify their certification of said Environmental Assessment: 1. The proposed Specific Plan and Site Development Permit applications will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, as the project in question will not be developed in any manner inconsistent with the General Plan and other current City standards. The project will not have the potential to C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\resos\resoeacc448.wpd 5so J1-5 Resolution 2002- WG Properties Environmental Assessment 2002-448 Adopted: June 18, 2002 substantially reduce or cause the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 2. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have potential for any adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which that wildlife depends. 3. The proposed Specific Plan and Site Development Permit applications will not have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. 4. The proposed Specific Plan and Site Development Permit applications will not have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, to the extent development activity in the area has been previously analyzed as part of the project approval process. Cumulative project impacts have been considered and mitigation measures proposed in conjunction with approval of those projects, and development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by this proposed project. 5. The proposed Specific Plan and Site Development Permit applications will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly, as the project contemplates land uses that are substantially similar to those already assessed under ultimate development of the La Quinta General Plan. No significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 6. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 7. The La Quinta Planning Commission and City Council have considered Environmental Assessment 2002-448 and determined that it reflects the independent judgement of the City. 8. The City has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 9. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department, located at 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. 58.1 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\resos\resoeacc448.wpd J �� Resolution 2002- WG Properties Environmental Assessment 2002-448 Adopted: June 18, 2002 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That is does hereby certify Environmental Assessment 2002-448 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum, attached hereto, and on file in the Community Development Department. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission held on this 181h day of June 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta 582 �-7 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\resos\resoeacc448.wpd Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Site Development Permit 2002-731 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Wallace Nesbit 760-777-7069 4. Project Location: ± 200 feet north of Lake La Quinta Drive, between Washington Street and Caleo Bay Drive 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: WG Properties 78467 Highway 111 La Quinta, CA 92253 6. General Plan Designation: CC (Community Commercial) 7. Zoning: CR (Regional Commercial) 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Review of development plans for construction of a 16,042 square foot commercial/office complex on a ± 1.5 acre site. 9. Surrounding Lane Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings.) North: Vacant M/RC land; retail use farther north South: Vacant M/RC land East: Low Density Residential development West: Institutional (St. Francis church and LOAF facility) 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\SpO56\EAdocs\ckist448.wpd 1 583 VL� Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology and Soils Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and nothing further is required. ❑ Signature Wallace Nesbit Preparer v, "/ � /o -Z- Date Community Development Dep't 584 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\EAdocs\ckist448- wpd 2 A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must account for the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. The analysis of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance 585 1) C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\EAdocs\cklst448.wpd 3 Potentially Issues (and SupportingInformation Sources): Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (LQ General Plan) b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Site assessment) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Site assessment) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials/site assessment) II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: (In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Dept. Of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland) Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural use? (EIR, LQGP) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map; LQGP MEA) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland to non-agricultural use? (site not in agricultural use) III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? 0 990 PM10 SIP) c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook/PM10 SIP) X X 9 X 91 X X 1:1 X X 58 . C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\SpO56\EAdocs\cklst448.wpd IV V. d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations? (Application materials/site analysis) pollutant X e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Application materials/site assessment) X BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (LQGP MEA) b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (site conditions; LQGP MEA) c) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (MEA,LQGP) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? (MEA; EIR, LQGP) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (La Quinta Municipal Code; LQGP) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (LQGP MEA; CVFTL HCP) CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a► Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? (CRM Tech Report, 12/05/2000 - SP 2001-049) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resource (i.e., an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? (CRM Tech Report, 12/05/2000 - SP 2001-049) U X ►0 X X X KI 7 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\SpO56\EAdocs\cklst448.wpd �.! 12 c) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? (Lakebed delineation map) X d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (CRM Tech Report, 12/05/2000) X VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (LQGP; EIR,) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (LQGP; EIR) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (LQGP EIR) iv) Landslides? (LQGP EIR) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (LQGP EIR) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that could become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (LQGP EIR) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (LQGP EIR) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (LQGP MEA) VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Site/project assessment) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Site/project assessment) c1 Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Site/project assessment) X X X X X X X X D9 X 583 A3 C:\W rkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\EAdocs\cklst448.wpd d) Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Riverside County Hazardous Materials Listing; Site/project assessment) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Not applicable) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip; would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Not applicable) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (LQGP MEA) h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (Aerial data; Site assessment) Vill. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY : Would the project: a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board standards or waste discharge requirements? (LQGP MEA) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (LQGP EIR) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off -site? (LQGP EIR, Lake LQ Maintenance Plan) d) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off-site?(LQGP EIR, Lake LQ Maintenance Plan) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems to control?(LQGP EIR, Lake LQ Maintenance Plant f) Place housing within a 100-year flood plain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Not applicable) g) Place within a 100-year flood plain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (LQGP MEA) C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\SpO56\EAdocs\cklst448. wpd X X X FQ X X X X X X X 5$9 1.4 IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Project/site assessment; Aerial data) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local costal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purposes of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan Land Use Element) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? (LQGP MEA; CVFTL HCP) X. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (LQGP MEA) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (LQGP MEA) XI. NOISE: Would the project result in: al Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (LQGP EIR) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground - based vibration/noise levels?(LQGP EIR) c1 A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?(LQGP EIR) d) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Not applicable) e1 For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive levels? (Not applicable) X X X X 12 ►:/ ►Ll X XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other X infrastructure) ? (LQGP; Project assessment) C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\SpO56\EAdocs\cklst448. wpd 8 5no 1 J b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Project assessment) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Project assessment) XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (LQGP EIR) Police protection? (LQGP EIR) Schools?(LQGP EIR) Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Park Master Plan) Other public facilities? (LQGP EIR) XIV. RECREATION: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks, or other recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of facilities would occur or be accelerated? (Project assessment) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Project assessment) XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (LQGP EIR) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (Not applicable) ON X X X X X X FN III X 91 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\EAdocs\ckist448. wpd 9 d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (LQGP EIR) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Project assessment, Fire/police comments) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Project assessment) g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Project assessment) XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (LQGP EIR; CVWD) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (LQGP MEA; CVWD comments). c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (LQGP MEA; CVWD comments) d) Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (LQGP MEA; CVWD comments) e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (CVWD comments) f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (LQGP MEA) XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? X X X X X X X X X X X X 592 17 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\EAdocs\cklst448. wpd 10 c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES. 051 X Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 1 5063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. Not applicable. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. See attached Checklist Addendum. 593 '4 3 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\SpO56\EAdocs\cklst448.wpd 11 Master Environmental Assessment, City of La Quinta General Plan 2002. Final Environmental Impact Report, City of La Quinta General Plan 2002. City of La Quinta General Plan, 2002. SCAQMD CEQA Handbook, 1993. Paleontological Lakebed Delineation Map, City of La Quinta. City of La Quinta Municipal Code Lake Management Plan for Lake La Quinta, 1989 State Implementation Plan for PM 10 in the Coachella Valley, November 1990. Habitat Conservation Plan for the Coachella Valley Fringe -Toed Lizard, Section 10A Permit, June 1985. 594 A3 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\SpO56\EAdocs\cklst448.wpd 12 Checklist Addendum for Environmental Assessment 2002-448 Introduction This Environmental Assessment has been prepared for a proposed 16,042 square foot office complex, to be located on 1.51 acres in the City of La Quinta. The site location is ±200 feet north of Lake La Quinta Drive, between Washington Street and Caleo Bay Drive. The project site is currently vacant, with the Lake La Quinta recreation and residential areas to the east, vacant commercial land to the south (approved for 8,500 s.f. of office and restaurant use), Washington Street, the La Quinta Arts Foundation facility (LQAF) and Saint Francis of Assisi Catholic Church to the west, and vacant commercial land to the north (proposed for a 25,500 s.f. medical office facility). I. AESTHETICS There are no scenic view sheds identified from the site, nor is the site directly in line with any view windows as identified by the General Plan documents. There will be minimal view obstruction from the proposed building at 30 foot maximum height to residents of Lake La Quinta as there is a significant distance between the site and any proximate residential lots. Also, the visibility lines to the 30 foot peak building height are similar to surrounding approved uses, some of which have lower peak heights but are sited closer to Washington Street and/or Caleo Bay Drive. II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES The site is in an area identified by the General Plan EIR as being prime agricultural soil. The soil type is of the Gilman series (GbA, GbB, GcA), which are well drained, moderately permeable soils suitable for agriculture and recreational uses. Development of the site will remove approximately 1.5 acres from the City's inventory of available prime agricultural soil. However, this is recognized as a cumulative impact due to the growth -inducing nature of impacts associated with adoption of the General Plan, and the designation of the site in that document for commercial land use. The property is not, nor has it been, in agricultural production. Its location away from agriculture -based infrastructure, in an urbanizing area, along with the small parcel size, render the site unsuitable for such use. III. AIR QUALITY Development of the proposed project will not, in and of itself, have an appreciable impact on ambient air quality. Air quality impacts for a development of this type and scale are generally limited to short-term construction. In the Coachella Valley, the greatest concern relative to 595 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\EAdocs\ea2002448.wpd �J R. ' construction emissions is particulate matter. The site has been previously disturbed in its entirety during prior grading of Tract 24230, and is a source of fugitive dust during moderate wind periods. The Coachella Valley has in the past been a serious non -attainment area for PM 10 (particulate matter of 10 microns or smaller). However, in recent years the area has met criteria for reclassification to attainment status and, in fact, SCAQMD has filed for such status recognition from California Air Resources Board (CARB). The latest information from SCAQMD indicates that the Valley has now moved back into non -attainment status. In order to control PM10, the City has imposed standards and requirements on development to control dust, and is in the process of modifying its current ordinances to improve monitoring and compliance requirements. No grubbing, clearing, grading or land disturbance of any kind is permitted without the review and approval of a PM10 Fugitive Dust Control Plan (FDCP), as required by Chapter 6.16, LQMC. Adherence to these requirements will ensure that impacts to air quality from the proposal will not exceed those under the present site conditions. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The project site has been significantly impacted by prior land disturbance activity and development of improvements associated with the Lake La Quinta project surrounding this site. The site is isolated on the east and west by developed roadways, with commercial lands to the immediate north and south, and is not viable as habitat nor would it facilitate the transitional migration or movement of species. The site is within the CVFTL habitat fee area, with the fee having been paid as part of the prior grading of Tract 24230. No significant stands of trees or other vegetation exist on the site, as verified by field observation. No impacts to any biological resources are identifiable V. CULTURAL RESOURCES It was determined during initial review that a Phase I (survey level) cultural resource assessment would not be required for the proposed site, based upon findings contained in previous surveys prepared for contiguous sites. As a result, while unlikely, there is unknown potential for impacts to historic/cultural resources. Standard monitoring requirements will be conditioned upon project approval to ensure detection and retrieval of any uncovered resources. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS The proposed project area lies just inside the Zone III ground shaking zone. It is close to the Zone IV designation that includes much of the Highway 1 1 1 and northern La Quinta areas. The property, as with the rest of the City, will be subject to significant ground movement in the event of a major earthquake. C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\EAdocs\ea2OO2448.wpd IJ 596 21 Structures already constructed within the area have been required to conform to Uniform Building Code standards for seismic zones. All proposed structures will be subject to conformance with the Uniform Building Code. The City Engineer will require the preparation of site -specific geotechnical analysis in conjunction with the submittal of grading plans for all development proposed on the site. Adherence to these requirements will adequately address project impacts due to ground failure. XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC There will be some increase in traffic volume associated with the project's development (i.e. vacant to urban transition). The proposal was reviewed by the City Public Works Department. There is shared access proposed with the northern parcel to Washington Street, a Major Arterial under the General Plan. Caleo Bay and 47th Avenue are designed and built as Collector status roadways, with adequate capacity to accommodate existing and projected traffic volumes. No traffic issues were identified and no studies of area -wide traffic patterns or generation were requested. No significant impacts have been identified that would require mitigation at this time. XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE No mitigation beyond standard ordinance requirements has been deemed necessary. No Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared, as project conditions will adequately address all requirements on the project and shall therefore serve as the monitoring for it. 597 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\EAdocs\ea2002448.wpd 1 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR A ± 16,000 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL/OFFICE COMPLEX CASE NO: SPECIFIC PLAN 2002-056 WG PROPERTIES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 18th day of June, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation for Specific Plan 2002-056, a request by WG Properties to develop a ± 16,000 square foot commercial/office complex on a 1.51 acre site, located ± 200 feet north of the intersection of Lake La Quinta Drive and Washington Street, more particularly described as: PARCEL 6 OF PM 27892, PM 182/063 OF MAPS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 28th day of May, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing (as continued from April 23`d, 2002 and May 14th, 2002) to consider a recommendation on Specific Plan 2002-056, and at said hearing, did recommend approval of said Specific Plan; and, WHEREAS, said Specific Plan application has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended, City Council Resolution 83-63, in that the Community Development Department has determined that the proposed Specific Plan could not have a significant adverse impact on the environment, and that a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did make the following findings to justify approval of said Specific Plan: 1 . The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, as it will not be developed in any manner inconsistent with the General Plan land use designation of Community Commercial and other current City standards. 2. The proposed Specific Plan will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare, as the site design aspects of said Specific Plan will be compatible with and not detrimental to surrounding 59& C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\resos\resoccsp056.wpd ��23 Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 2002-056 Adopted: June 18, 2002 development in the Lake La Quinta tract and surrounding area, and with the overall design quality prevalent in the City. 3. The proposed Specific Plan is compatible with the zoning on adjacent properties, as the project contemplates land uses that are substantially equivalent to those permitted under existing zoning for permitted uses, and which were previously addressed in the EIR certified for the General Plan. Specifically, development of existing Regional Commercial land is considered to implement zoning consistency with the General Plan Land Use designation of Community Commercial. 4. The proposed Specific Plan is suitable and appropriate for the subject property, as the project contemplates land uses that are substantially similar to those already assessed under ultimate development of the La Quinta General Plan, and which were previously addressed in the EIR certified for the General Plan. Specifically, development of the site as Community Commercial land use is considered to be suitable and appropriate due to the General Plan designations for existing and approved residential and commercial development/land use in the surrounding areas. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve Specific Plan 2002-056 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 18th day of June, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 599 Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 2002-056 Adopted: June 18, 2002 development in the Lake La Quinta tract and surrounding area, and with the overall design quality prevalent in the City. 3. The proposed Specific Plan is compatible with the zoning on adjacent properties, as the project contemplates land uses that are substantially equivalent to those permitted under existing zoning for permitted uses, and which were previously addressed in the EIR certified for the General Plan. Specifically, development of existing Regional Commercial land is considered to implement zoning consistency with the General Plan Land Use designation of Community Commercial. 4. The proposed Specific Plan is suitable and appropriate for the subject property, as the project contemplates land uses that are substantially similar to those already assessed under ultimate development of the La Quinta General Plan, and which were previously addressed in the EIR certified for the General Plan. Specifically, development of the site as Community Commercial land use is considered to be suitable and appropriate due to the General Plan designations for existing and approved residential and commercial development/land use in the surrounding areas. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve Specific Plan 2002-056 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 18th day of June, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: 600 Resolution 2002- Specific Plan 2002-056 Adopted: June 18, 2002 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\resos\resoccsp056.wpd 601 V a. RESOLUTION 2002- EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 2002-056 WG PROPERTIES LLC JUNE 18, 2002 Bold italics indicate Planning Commision changes on May 28, 2002. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Specific Plan 2002-056 (SP 2002-056) shall be developed in compliance with these conditions, the Specific Plan document, and all approved site plan, elevation, color, materials and other exhibits submitted for this application and any subsequent amendment(s). In the event of any conflicts between these conditions and the provisions of SP 2002-056, these conditions shall take precedence. 2. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Specific Plan or any application thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. 3. All changes to the Specific Plan which are also included in the Site Development Permit shall be made to the latter to ensure consistency. The project proponent shall submit amended documents within 30 days of City Council approval of the Specific Plan and Site Development Permit, or issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs first. 4. SP 2002-056 shall comply with all applicable conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approvals: • Environmental Assessment 2002-448 • Site Development Permit 2002-731 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Community Development Director shall determine precedence. 5. The Specific Plan document for SP 2002-056 shall be revised in conformance with the following: A. Page 3.C. - In the second paragraph, revise the second phase building area from 7,250 to 6,500 square feet. 602 CAWrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\COA\coaccsp056.wpd � 2 7 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Specific Plan 2002-056 B. Page 6 - Under Roof Lines and Screening, add a second sentence: Roof lines will not exceed 22 feet within 150 feet of Washington Street, except for tower elements shown on the Phase 1 building, which shall not exceed 30 feet for the west tower element and 26 feet for the south tower element. " C. Page 7, Signage (sic) Criteria - Change reference from 'Signage' to 'Sign'. Add text: "A detailed sign program will be submitted prior to occupancy permits for any permanent building". 6. Minor changes, as determined by the Community Development Director to be consistent with the intent and purpose of the Specific Plan, may be approved. Examples include modifications to landscaping materials and/or design, parking and circulation arrangements not involving reductions in required standards beyond those identified in the Specific Plan, minor site, building area or other revisions necessary due to changes in technical plan aspects such as drainage, street improvements, grading, etc. Such changes may be approved on a staff - level basis and shall not constitute a requirement to amend the Specific Plan. Consideration for any modifications shall be requested in writing to the Director and submitted with appropriate graphic and/or textual documentation in order to make a determination on the request. 8. All other applicable conditions of approval for SDP 2002-731, and any subsequent amendment(s), shall be incorporated into the revised text for SP 2002-056 in the appropriate sections. The revised Specific Plan document shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for compliance review and acceptance prior to issuance of any permit for a main building. C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\SpO56\COA\coaccspO56.wpd v693 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A ± 16,000 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL/OFFICE COMPLEX CASE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-731 WG PROPERTIES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 18th day of June, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider Site Development Permit 2002-731, for a ± 16,000 square -foot commercial/office complex on a 1 .51 acre site, located ± 200 feet north of the intersection of Lake La Quinta Drive and Washington Street, more particularly described as: PARCEL 6 OF PM 27892, PM 182/063 OF MAPS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 28th day of May, 2002 (as continued from April 23rd, 2002 and May 14th, 2002), hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation to the City Council on said Site Development Permit application, and at said hearing, did in fact recommend approval of said Site Development Permit; and, WHEREAS, said Site Development Permit application has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-63), in that the Community Development Department has determined that the proposed Site Development Permit could not have a significant adverse impact on the environment, and that a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Site Development Permit: 1 . The proposed Site Development Permit is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, as it will not be developed in any manner inconsistent with the General Plan land use designation of Community Commercial and other current City standards. 2. The proposed Site Development Permit is consistent with the La Quinta Zoning Code, as the project contemplates land uses that are substantially equivalents 604 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\resos\resoccsdp731.wpd Resolution 2002- Site Development Permit 2002-731 Adopted: June 18, 2002 to those permitted under existing zoning of permitted uses, and which were previously addressed in the EIR certified for the General Plan. Specifically, development of existing Regional Commercial lands is considered to implement zoning consistency with the General Plan. 3. The proposed Site Development Permit complies with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (City Council Resolution 83-63), as it has been determined that the Site Development Permit could not have a significant adverse impact on the environment, and that a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed. 4. The architectural design aspects of the proposed Site Development Permit will be compatible with and not detrimental to surrounding development in the Lake La Quinta tract, and with the overall design quality prevalent in the City. 5. The site design aspects of the proposed Site Development Permit will be compatible with and not detrimental to surrounding development in the Lake La Quinta tract and surrounding area, and with the overall design quality prevalent in the City. 6. The project landscaping for the proposed Site Development Permit has been designed to unify and enhance visual continuity of the proposed project with the surrounding development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve Site Development Permit 2002-731 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this the 1 8th day of June, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\resos\resoccsdp731.wpd �' v Resolution 2002- Site Development Permit 2002-731 Adopted: June 18, 2002 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta r; 0 �. C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\resos\resoccsdp731.wpd �' �. RESOLUTION 2002- EXHIBIT "All CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2002-731 WG PROPERTIES LLC JUNE 18, 2002 Bold italics, strikeout indicate Planning Commission changes on May 28, 2002. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 . Site Development Permit 2002-731 (SDP 2002-731) shall be developed in compliance with these conditions and all approved site plan, elevation, color, materials and other approved exhibits submitted for this application, and any subsequent amendment(s). In the event of any conflicts between these conditions and the provisions of SDP 2002-731 these conditions shall take precedence. 2. SDP 2002-731 shall comply with all applicable conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approvals: • Environmental Assessment 2002-448 • Specific Plan 2002-056 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Community Development Director shall determine precedence. 3. This approval shall expire one year after it's effective date, as determined pursuant to Section 9.200.060.0 of the Zoning Code, unless extended pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.200.080. The validity of other related applications, as identified in Condition #2, may be considered in determining extension provisions. 4. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this development application or any application thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\COA\coaccsdp731.wpd ,� Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Site Development Permit 2002-731 Exhibit "A" 5. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction or building permit, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances from the following public agencies: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Building and Safety Department • La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading/ Improvement/Encroachment Permits) • La Quinta Community Development Department • Riverside County Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Southern California Gas Company • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) • Waste Management of the Desert The applicant is responsible for any requirements of the permits or clearances from those jurisdictions. If the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of said approvals prior to obtaining City approval of the plans. 6. Handicap access and facilities shall be provided in accordance with Federal (ADA), State and local requirements. Handicap accessible parking shall generally conform with the approved exhibits for SDP 2002-731 . 7. All parking area civil plans and improvements shall be developed in accordance with the standards set forth in applicable portions of Section 9.1 50.080 of the Zoning Code. 8. All applicable conditions of approval for SDP 2002-731 shall be incorporated into the revised text for Specific Plan 2002-056 in the appropriate sections. The revised document shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for compliance review prior to issuance of the first building permit. PROPERTY RIGHTS 9. Prior to the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire, or confer, those easements, and other property rights necessary for the construction and/or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\COA\coaccsdp731.wpd � 0 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Site Development Permit 2002-731 Exhibit "A" include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services, and for the maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 10. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for any acceleration and deceleration lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 11 . Unless the ultimate developed right-of-way can be documented, the public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) None - All off site street dedication is in place. 12. If the City Engineer determines that access rights to proposed street rights of way shown on the tentative map are necessary prior to approval of final maps dedicating the rights of way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights of way within 60 days of written request by the City. 13. The applicant shall create perimeter setbacks along public rights of way as follows (listed setback depth is the average depth if meandering wall design is approved): A. Washington Street - None - Landscape Setbacks have been dedicated. B. Caleo Bay - 10 feet from the Right of Way/Property Line. The setback requirement applies to all frontage including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall dedicate blanket easements for those purposes. 14. The applicant shall dedicate easements necessary for placement of and access to utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas as shown on the Site Development Permit. gnrl C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\COA\coaccsdp731.wpd �.� v i Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Site Development Permit 2002-731 Exhibit "A" 15. The applicant shall vacate abutter's rights of access to public streets and properties from all frontage along the streets and properties, with the exception of those access points shown on the Site Development Permit. 16. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements or written permission, as appropriate, from owners of any abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments are to occur. 17. If the applicant proposes vacation or abandonment of any existing rights of way or access easements which will diminish access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall provide approved alternate rights of way or access easements to those properties or notarized letters of consent from the property owners 18. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of this Site Development Permit and the date of final acceptance of the on and off -site improvements for this Site Development Permit, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. IMPROVEMENT PLANS 19. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans), LQMC. As used throughout these conditions of approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 20. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. C. Perimeter Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' D. On -Site Rough Grading Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\COA\coaccsdp731.wpd ��J Resolution 2002- Exhibit "A" Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Site Development Permit 2002-731 E. Site Development Plans: 1 " = 30' Horizontal F. On -Site Utility Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal G. On -Site Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. "Site Development" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements; and show the existing street improvements out to at least the center lines of adjacent existing streets. "Site Utility" plans shall normally include all sub -surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to sewer lines, water lines, fire protection and storm drainage systems. "Rough Grading" plans shall include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. 21. The City maintains standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City resolution, the applicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes from the City. 22. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all complete, approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. 611 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\COA\coaccsdp731.wpd ,Q % Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Site Development Permit 2002-731 Exhibit "A" Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format which can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. FIRE PROTECTION 23. Approved Super -fire hydrants shall be located not less that 25 feet, nor more that 165 feet, from any portion of the buildings as measured along vehicular travel ways. 24. Blue dot reflectors shall be placed in the street 8 inches from centerline to the street side of each hydrant, to identify the hydrant locations. 25. The required water system, including fire hydrants, will be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. 26. Automatic fire sprinkler systems are required in all new commercial structures 5,000 square feet or greater, in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code 8.08.090 and NFPA 13. Sprinkler system plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department. 27. Minimum fire flow is 1,500 GPM for a 2-hour duration. Fire flow is based on Type VN construction and a complete fire sprinkler system. 28. Building plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for plan review, to run concurrent with City plan checking. 29. Any operation that produces grease -laden vapors will require a Hood/duct system for fire protection (i.e restaurants, etc.). 30. Install a KNOX key box on each commercial building. Applicant must contact the Fire Department for an application. 31. Install portable fire extinguishers as required by the California Fire Code. 32. The applicant/developer shall prepare and submit for Fire Department approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\COA\coaccsdp731.wpd � v l Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Site Development Permit 2002-731 GRADING Exhibit "A" 33. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 34. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 35. Prior to obtaining an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect; B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, and; C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16 (Fugitive Dust Control), LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions submitted with its application for a grading permit. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall furnish a preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report and an approved grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer. The grading plan shall conform with the recommendations of the soils report and be certified as adequate by a soils engineer or engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on final maps (if any are required of this development) that a soils report has been prepared pursuant to Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code. 37. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 38, The final building pad elevation for the proposed building shall not differ by more than one foot from the building pads in adjacent developments. 613 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\COA\coaccsdp731.wpd v� Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Site Development Permit 2002-731 Exhibit "A" The limits given in this condition and the previous condition are not entitlements and more restrictive limits may be imposed in the map approval or plan checking process. If compliance with the limits is impractical, however, the City will consider alternatives which minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 39. The applicant shall maintain graded, undeveloped land to prevent wind and water erosion of soils. The land shall be planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. 40. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any building pads within the project site by more than plus or minus three tenths of a foot from the elevations shown on the approved Site Development Permit, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Staff for a substantial conformance finding review. 41. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 42. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water), LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08-DWQ . A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs five (5) acres or more of land, or that disturbs less than five (5) acres of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than five (5) acres of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). r1� C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\COA\coaccsdp731.wpd o� Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Site Development Permit 2002-731 Exhibit "A" B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this Site Development Permit. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practice ("BMPs"), 8.70.020 (Definitions), LQMC: 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All of applicant's erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off site grading being done in relation to this project. F. All approved project BMPs shall be maintained in their proper working order throughout the course of construction, and until all improvements have been accepted by the City. 43. Stormwater shall be directed to the approved drainage system for Tract 24230/Tract 26152 (Lake La Quinta). Nuisance flows from the subject SDP 2002-731 shall be accommodated on site through an acceptable system. The applicant shall demonstrate that there is sufficient capacity in the existing system to accept the design run off from the proposed project. If the existing system is not capable to carry any or all of the developed run off from this development, the applicant shall retain the incremental difference on site. 44. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to Section 9.100.040(B)(7), LQMC. The C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\COA\coaccsdp731.wpd 615 , I Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Site Development Permit 2002-731 Exhibit "A" parking lot drainage may not be directed to the existing retention basin in the Washington Street parkway unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that the basin was sized to accommodate the run off from the developed property as well as the run off from Washington Street. 45. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries, levels or frequencies in any area outside the development. 46. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 47. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. UTILITIES 48. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.1 10 (Utilities), LQMC. 49. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within the right of way and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electrical vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 50. Existing aerial lines within or adjacent to the proposed development and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. Power lines exceeding 34.5 kv are exempt from this requirement. 51. Utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing, improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of trench compaction for approval of the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 52. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC, adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, and as approved C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\COA\coaccsdp731.wpd 4 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Site Development Permit 2002-731 Exhibit "A" by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 53. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations which convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue for street sweeping. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flow line shall be vertical (1/8" batter) and a minimum of 0.1' in height. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to normal curbing prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 54. Parking lot design shall conform to the requirements of LQMC Chapters 9.150 and 12.32. 55. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 56. The City will conduct final inspections only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -maintained streets. Improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. 57. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Primary Entry (Washington Street) shared access located on the northerly property line. This driveway shall be a shared access drive/road with the adjacent landowner to the north (see SDP 2001-736) and shall be centered on the northerly property line. This driveway shall have right in/right out turning movements, only. Nothing in this condition requires the adjacent landowner to pay for sufficient improvements to implement the shared access requirements in a manner that serves the development proposed by SDP 2002-731. However, reasonable cooperation by the adjacent landowner does include granting of reciprocal cross -access easements between the two landowners that facilitate construction of improvements AM C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\COA\coaccsdp731.wpd J+ 4 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Site Development Permit 2002-731 Exhibit "A" necessary to implement the shared access concept on both properties in a manner that precludes unnecessary reconstruction of the improvements in the future. The applicant is advised that there is restricted access along Washington Street. The applicant shall submit the necessary legal descriptions and exhibits which clearly define the proposed access location and width. The vacation of the restricted access will be presented to the City Council for approval. B. Secondary Entry(s) on Caleo Bay located approximately 20' north of the southerly property line, approximately at the center of the site, and approximately 30 feet south of the northerly property line. These driveways may have full right in/right out and left in/left out turning movements. The applicant shall re -stripe portions of Caleo Bay to accommodate the left turn lanes at the driveways. Signing and striping plans which detail the left turn lanes and centerline striping shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for approval. 58. Pursuant to Section 9.150.080(A)(8)(b) (Parking), LQIVIC, the applicant shall provide 30-foot uninterrupted driveway throats into the parking lot, or alternatively provide a combination of a dedicated right turn deceleration lane and the drive throat that will equal a total of 30-feet. LANDSCAPING 59. The applicant shall provide landscaping in all.required setbacks, retention basins, common lots, and park areas. 60. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit plans for approval by the Community Development Department prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking is complete, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner prior to submitting for signature by 6t8 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\COA\coaccsdp731.wpd A 3 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Site Development Permit 2002-731 Exhibit "A" the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 61. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. 62. The final landscaping plans submitted for plan check shall incorporate the items listed below, in order to maintain continuity of landscaping improvements along Caleo Bay Drive: A. Tree species to be used in the Caleo Bay Parkway shall primarily consist of Chilean Mesquite. B.. Use of shrub species Feathery Cassia and Bougainvillea "La Jolla" shall be employed from the north parkway, transitioning to the south. Final plans submitted for plan check may require further revision due to potential changes in project landscaping for the north and south parcels. Review of landscaping improvements on Caleo Bay parkway shall be coordinated with those plans based on the best available information at time of review. 63. Landscaping within the overall project area shall be commonly maintained under a single maintenance contract. Prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, an appropriate maintenance mechanism shall be established to assure compliance with this requirement. Documentation necessary to meet this requirement shall be submitted for review and acceptance by the Community Development/Public Works Departments prior to any Certificate of Occupancy for building areas. Said documentation must include that landscape materials shall be maintained as planted in perpetuity, and that dead, dying or otherwise missing landscape improvements shall be replaced, re -planted or provided within 30 calendar days. PUBLIC SERVICES 64. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as may be required by Sunline Transit and approved by the City Engineer. QUALITY ASSURANCE C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\COA\coaccsdp731.wpd 619 41 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Site Development Permit 2002-731 Exhibit "A" 65. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures which meet the approval of the City Engineer. 66. The applicant shall employ or retain qualified civil engineers, geotechnical engineers, surveyors, or other appropriate professionals to provide sufficient construction supervision to be able to furnish and sign accurate record drawings. 67. The applicant shall arrange and bear the cost of measurement, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program but required by the City as evidence that construction materials and methods comply with plans, specifications and applicable regulations. 68. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were signed by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As - Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the CAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City to reflect as -constructed conditions. MAINTENANCE 69. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. The applicant shall maintain required public improvements until expressly released from this responsibility by the appropriate public agency. CULTURAL RESOURCES 70. Prior to issuance of a grading permit or any earth disturbance, the applicant shall have prepared and obtained approval from the Community Development Department for an archaeological monitoring program for the project site. The program shall be prepared by a qualified archaeologist, and shall include provisions for strictly controlled archaeological monitoring and data recovery, including research and field methods, lab analysis methodology, Native American consultation and monitoring, curation procedures, report preparation and disposition of artifacts and records. 0 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\COA\coaccsdp731.wpd 4 J Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Site Development Permit 2002-731 FEES AND DEPOSITS Exhibit "A" 71. The applicant shall pay the City's established fees for plan checking and construction inspection. Fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan checking and permits. 72. Provisions shall be made to comply with the terms and requirements of the City's adopted Art in Public Places program in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. 73. Prior to approval of a final map or completion of any approval process for modification of boundaries of the property or lots subject to these conditions, the applicant shall process a reapportionment of any bonded assessment(s) against the property and pay the cost of the reapportionment. 74. Any permit(s) issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of said permit(s). MISCELLANEOUS 75. The applicant shall submit a detailed project area lighting plan for the entire Specific Plan area. The lighting plan shall comply with the following general criteria: A. Pole -mounted light standards shall be limited to 18 feet adjacent to Caleo Bay, and shall not exceed 20 feet in height throughout the site, consistent with developments to the north and south. Pole lighting and under -canopy lighting fixtures shall incorporate flush lens caps or similar recessed ceiling lighting. B. The lighting plan shall incorporate bollard lighting for pedestrian areas and parking aisle entries. The lighting plan shall include a photometric plan and must be approved prior to issuance of the first permanent building permit. 76. A comprehensive sign program shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to establishment of any permanent signs for the 621 C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\Sp056\COA\coaccsdp731.wpd 4 0' Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Site Development Permit 2002-731 Exhibit "A" project. Provisions of the sign program shall be in compliance with applicable sections of Chapter 9.160 of the Zoning Code and Specific Plan 2002-056. 77. All roof -mounted mechanical equipment must be screened and installed using compatible architectural materials and treatments, in a manner so as not to be visible from surrounding properties and streets. Working drawings showing all such equipment and locations shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department along with construction plan submittal for building permits. Method and design of screening must be approved by the Community Development Department prior to any issuance of building permits related to structures requiring such screening. 78. The trash enclosure located at the north easternmost corner of the site shall be relocated, with the current location to be used for additional parking as can be accommodated. 79. The Phase 2 building shall be limited to a maximum of 6,500 square feet in order to maintain the current parking requirements. Plans for this building are subject to the Site Development. Permit review process and shall be consistent with the Specific Plan (SP 2002-056) for WG Properties as approved at time of Phase 2 submittal. C:\Wrkgrp\Casedocs\SpO56\COA\coaccsdp731.wpd 6 �47 ATTACHMENT #2 w -41TH AVE. SITE. LAKE LA QUINTA DR. 5 SITE LOCATION MAP cAsE No. S P 2002-056 SDP 2002-731 u ORTH SCALE: NTS 62 c ATTACHMENT #3 00 .24 O ZPPuczft 1, ... .. . ..... CEMMG PLA Ap- AP q cr =OP PEPPER 61 IREE) F1.0 X 14 rr J/ FUTURE 61.940TC .3 aax p C k a 0 STORYOF91 eg , $ Ile— . ooe f' C In 02aCARS W0.0) 10 Jg PROP. A.C. #do* P.E. =62.1 2% b%' -le —PROP. 6 150 Ra 12 IT 24 4. PROP. V_ p P P CLft PROP " IT. ROOF 12 4.9ax H/&# PROP. c a c 12 STORY 24=0 8.792 S. pRo. d AC p dx 2r 4.71X 21' F.F.=62.50 Al P.E.=62.0 07 P* —,p io. or PLtCZL*e 24. 1"14, WERNER MD C. 4* 4040 S.F. F.F.=62.50 3 13.63X P.E.=62.0 PAT* a lb % 1.407 c 21' IT e. \ Z"N' 4*1 P-Z- ........ m+I DEVELOPER Ic 5 ATTACHMENT #4 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA May 28, 2002 I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00, P.M. A. This meeting of the Planning Commission was called order at 7:09 p.m. by Chairman Abels who asked Commissioner B er to lead the flag salute. B. Present: Commissioners Richard Butler, To irk, Steve Robbins, Robert Tyler, and Chairman Jacques Abels. C. Staff present: Community Developm t Director Jerry Herman, Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez, S for Engineer Steve Speer, Principal Planners Stan Sawa and Fred er, Associate Planners Wallace Nesbit and Martin Magana, and Exe tive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE ,!kGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Chairman bels asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of May 1 , 2002. Commissioner Tyler asked that Page 5, Item 2 be corre ed to read, "The Lake La Quinta Homeowners' Association..."; Pa 9, Item 4, change the word "march" to match". There being no f rther corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners yler/Butler to approve the minutes as corrected. Unanimously approved with Commissioner Kirk abstaining. Department Report: None PRESENTATIONS: None. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Environmental Assessment 2002-448, Specific Plan 2002-056, and Site Development Permit 2002-731; a request of WG Properties, LLC for 625 consideration of development plans for construction of a 8,792 square G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 1 1� 5 1. Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 foot office building on a 1.51 acre parcel located at the east side of Washington Street, north of Lake La Quinta Drive, within the Lake La Quinta project area. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Kirk asked if most of the site plan landscaping consisted of decomposed granite. Staff stated yes. Commissioner Kirk asked if the turf was only for the future office building, or will it be used elsewhere. Staff stated the turf along Washington Street will be retained for the retention basin; the turf for the future building is for dust control and aesthetics. Commissioner Kirk asked if the Specific Plan is a requirement in the Regional Commercial District. Staff stated no, the applicant did so because they exceeded the 22-foot height requirement. Commissioner Kirk asked if there was any other mechanism that would allow them to acquire the height limit without a specific plan. Staff stated there are provisions to allow an element to protrude beyond the height limitations, but this did not fall within that provision. 3. Commissioner Butler asked if the Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee challenged the height of buildings. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated it is not within their purview. 4. Commissioner Tyler asked where the 150 foot setback line was on the plans. Staff indicated what page in the staff report and indicated the location on the site plan. Commissioner Tyler stated he was unable to find where the applicant had specifically requested to exceed the 22 foot height limit. Staff stated there was no specific verbiage in the plan; it is part of the site plan request. Staff asked if the Commission would like this clarified in the conditions for the Specific Plan. Commissioner Tyler asked that it be written into the Specific Plan. He asked about the three access points off Caleo Bay, if one was omitted it would give more parking. Discussion followed regarding the access point ri G and parking spaces. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 2 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 5. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Robert Ricciardi, architect representing the applicant, gave a presentation on the project. 6. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Tyler stated he thought the trash trucks would have a difficult time getting in and out. Mr. Ricciardi stated it is a minimal impact as they would be in and out before the tenants arrived. To relocate it would require losing parking spaces. 7. Commissioner Kirk asked if he had any concerns about changing the architectural style on the second office building. Mr. Ricciardi stated they would like to keep the Spanish style. 8. Commissioner Robbins asked if the second building could go to 30 feet. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated no and staff would condition the height limits. 9. Chairman Abels asked if anyone else would like to address the Commission regarding this project. 10. Mr. Chuck Patelli, general contractor for the project, explained the purpose of the two driveways on Caleo Bay was to allow for the future second building and to give additional fire access. 1 1. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened the matter up for Commission discussion. 12. Commissioner Kirk asked if the Fire Department had requested the second access. Staff stated they did not. Commissioner Kirk asked if the applicant could have applied for a zone change, or was a specific plan required in order to obtained the additional height. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated the Zoning Code requires the 22 foot height limit unless, there was a hardship to allow a variance, and in this case there was none. Commissioner Kirk stated he supported the project as it is a nice design. He stated Commissioner Tyler's comments regarding access and parking orientation are fair. He will vote "no" on the Specific Plan even though he will vote "yes" on the rest of the project because he is not in favor of a specific plan being solely 62 used to change the height requirements. 51 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 3 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 13. Commissioner Tyler asked if the approved restaurant to the south had any height variations. Staff stated no, it was 22 feet. Commissioner Tyler questioned why there was a statement in the conditions regarding how long it took to go through plan check. Senior Engineer Steve Speer explained the process. Commissioner Tyler stated it was a valid point, but did not belong in the conditions. Staff would remove the statement. 14. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-050 recommending certification of a Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-448, as submitted: ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 15. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-051 recommending approval of Specific Plan 2002-056, subject to findings and conditions as amended: A. The future building pad elevation shall be a maximum 22 feet in height. B. The Specific Plan shall be changed to reflect that the building closest to Washington cannot exceed 30 feet as indicated in the site plan. C. Condition 20.E.: Eliminate the sentence regarding the time required for plan checking. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: Commissioners Kirk/Robbins. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 16. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-052 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2002-731, subject to findings and conditions as submitted. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins, and Chairman Abels. NOES: Commissioner Tyler. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. s G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 4 Tiht 4 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing on 1) Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, and 2) Tentative Tract Map 30378, a Request to Subdivide 9.13 Acres into 8 Residential Lots and Other Common Lots on Property Located at the Southwest Corner of Avenue 51 and Madison Street Applicant: Rod Vandenbos RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: 3 Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying Environmental Assessment 2002- 441, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Tentative Tract 30378. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract 30378, a request to subdivide 9.13 acres into 8 residential lots and other common lots located at the southwest corner of Avenue 51 and Madison Street, subject to conditions. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CITY CHARTER IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The 9.13 acres (Attachment 1) is currently a citrus orchard taking access from Madison Street. Surrounding Land Uses: North: South: East: West: Very Low Density Residential (RVL) Very Low Density Residential (RVL) City of Indio, El Dorado Polo Club Very Low Density Residential (RVL) 629 Applicant Request: This Tract proposes 8 residential lots with 19 drainage, common, and private street lots (Attachment 2). All 8 residential lots are proposed to have driveway access from a 60' width internal cul-de-sac road with an intermittent landscaped median. Residential lot sizes range from .81 to 1 .01 . There exists a 50 foot right-of-way dedication for Madison Street; an additional 5 feet will be required to complete a full 55 foot of half street right-of-way for a Primary Arterial. The future Madison Street cross section, as modified, identifies the street right -of way, 20' landscape easement including a 10' multi -purpose trail (the 6' sidewalk maybe included unless the applicant provides assurance that the City of Indio will provide it on the east side of Madison Street), and a 25' dedicated drainage easement on lots G-K. On -site retention is achieved with the additionally dedicated 35' drainage easement on the front of each lot. A homeowners' association will be formed to maintain retention basins, common landscaped areas, private roads, and perimeter landscaping. Public Notice: The case was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on May 24, 2002. All property owners within 500-feet of the affected area were mailed a copy of the public notice as required. Attached is a letter from a property owner regarding this application (Attachment 3). Public Agency Review: The Tentative Tract was sent out for comments to City Departments and affected public agencies on January 20, 2002. Agency comments received have been made a part of the Conditions of Approval. Environmental Assessment: Based on California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements, staff prepared Environmental Assessment (EA) 2001-441 for the project. Staff recommends certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. Planning Commission Hearing: The Planning Commission considered this Tract Map request at its meeting of May 28, 2002. After a short discussion regarding the Conditions of Approval the Planning Commission voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval of this request, subject to conditions (Attachment 4) . �.t FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The findings necessary to approve the Tentative Tract can be made per the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, and Zoning Code as noted in the attached Resolutions. There are no issues. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying Environmental Assessment 2002-441, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Tentative Tract 30378; and, Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract 30378, a request to subdivide 9.13 acres into 8 residential lots and other common lots located at the southwest corner of Avenue 51 and Madison Street, subject to conditions; or, 2. Do not Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying Environmental Assessment 2002-441, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Tentative Tract 30378; and, Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract 30378, a request to subdivide 9.13 acres into 8 residential lots and other common lots located at the southwest corner of Avenue 51 and Madison Street, subject to conditions; or, 3. Continue the public hearing to a future meeting to allow for additional review; or, 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, rry He4man immunity Development Director Approved for Submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Managern-31 t: 3 AACCstaffprt.TT30378.wpd Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Tentative Tract 30378 (City Council only) 3. Letter received 4. Excerpts from Planning Commission Minutes of May 28, 2002 63`' A:\CCstaffprt.TT30378. wpd RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PREPARED FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30378 CASE NO.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-441 APPLICANT: ROD VANDENBOS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 18th day of June, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2002-441 for Tentative Tract 30378 herein referred to as the "Project" for Rod Vandenbos; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 28th day of May, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2002-441 for Tentative Tract 30378 herein referred to as the "Project" for Rod Vandenbos; and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared collectively for Environmental Assessment 2002-441 prepared for Tentative Tract 30378 generally located at the southwest corner of Avenue 51 and Madison Street, more particularly described as: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS: 772-270-01 1, 772-270-012, & 772-270-013; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, section 15000 et. seq., ("CEQA Guidelines"); and WHEREAS, the City mailed notice of its intention to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration in compliance with Pubic Resources Code Section 21092 on May 24, 2002, to landowners within 500 feet of the Project Site and to all public entities entitled to notice under CEQA, which notice also included a notice of the public hearing before the City Council on June 18, 2002; and, WHEREAS, the City published a notice of its intention to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and associated Initial Study in the Desert Sun on May 17, 2002, and further caused the notice to be filed with the Riverside County Clerk in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines; and, WHEREAS, during the comment period, the City received no comment letters on the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, 633 AACC RESO EA 2002-441.wpd Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2002-441 Adopted June 18, 2002 Page 2 WHEREAS, the La Quinta Planning Commission on May 28, 2002, did consider the Project and recommended to the City Council certification of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project; and, WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on June 18, 2002, on the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, during which public hearing testimony and other evidence was received. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council, as follows: SECTION 1: The above recitations are true and correct and are adopted as the Findings of the Council. SECTION 2: The City Council finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared and processed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines and the City's implementation procedures. The City Council has independently reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and finds that it adequately describes and addresses the environmental effects of the Project, and that, based upon the Initial Study, the comments received thereon, and the entire record of proceeding for this Project, there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record that there may be significant adverse environmental effects as a result of the Project. The mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated into the Project and these measures mitigate any potential significant effect to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects will occur as a result of this Project. SECTION 3: The Project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2002-441 . SECTION 4: The Project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. SECTION 5: There is no evidence before the City that the Project will 6311 A:\CC RESO EA 2002-441.wpd Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2002-441 Adopted June 18, 2002 Page 3 have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. SECTION 6: The Project does not have the potential to achieve short- term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. SECTION 7: The Project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the Project. SECTION 8: The Project will not have the environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. SECTION 9: The City Council has fully considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and the comments received thereon. SECTION 10: The Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Council. SECTION 11: The location of the documents which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council decision is based is the La Quinta City Hall, Community Development Department, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253, and the custodian of those records is Jerry Herman, Community Development Director. SECTION 12: A Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP), a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby adopted pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21081.6 in order to assure compliance with the mitigation measures during Project implementation. SECTION 13: Based upon the Initial Study and the entire record of proceedings, the Project has no potential for adverse effects on wildlife as that term is defined in Fish and Game Code § 711.2. 635 A:\CC RESO EA 2002441.wpd " � 7 Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2002-441 Adopted June 18, 2002 Page 4 SECTION 14: The City Council has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 California Code of Regulations 753.5(d). SECTION 15: The Mitigated Negative Declaration is hereby certified and adopted. SECTION 16: The Community Development Director shall cause to be filed with the County Clerk a Notice of Determination pursuant to CEQA Guideline § 15075(a). PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 18th day of June, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California r` "% ^ AACC RESO EA 2002-441.wpd Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Tentative Tract Map 30378 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Fred Baker, 760-777-7125 4. Project Location: Southwest corner of Avenue 51 (extended) and Madison Street 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Rod Vandenbos 74785 Highway 1 1 1, Suite 100 Indian Wells, CA 92210 6. General Plan Designation: Very Low Density Residential 7. Zoning: Very Low Density Residential 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Tentative Tract Map to subdivide 9.16 acres into 8 lots ranging in size from 0.81 to 1.01 acres in size. The subdivision also includes a central cul-de-sac, an access drive from the southern property boundary at Madison Street, and lettered lots for the provision of open space areas along Madison Street. The land is currently a citrus grove. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings. North: Very Low Density Residential (Polo Estates) South: Vacant Very Low Density Residential lands now in agriculture West: All American Canal, recently approved Specific Plan for low density residential and golf course. East: Polo Grounds 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Not applicable r37 P:\FR£D\TT30378EACkIst.WPD Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology and Soils Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings Determination To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. �ignature 0 n 0 :G 638 Date ��- PAFRED\TT30378EACklst. W PD 2 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e•g• the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project - specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off - site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analysis are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. g) The analysis of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance B&C PAFRED\TT30378EACkIst.WPD J 1 I Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: AESTHETICS: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (General Plan EIR p. III-159 ff.) b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (General Plan EIR p. III-159 ff.) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials) II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES:. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Dept. Of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact X X X X a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (General Plan EIR p. III-21 ff.) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (Aerial photographs) III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) X 9 X X X • 1 e PAFRED\TT30378EACkIst.WPD 4 VI 1 7 c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Project Description) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Project Description) IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) c) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) Either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (La Quinta Municipal Code; General Plan) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? ("Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report, Tentative Tract No. 30378..." prepared by CRM Tech, April 2002.) KI X X X X X X X X 41 P:\FRED\TT30378EACk1St.WPD 5 k. � 13 b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resources (i.e., an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? ("Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report, Tentative Tract No. 30378..." prepared by CRM Tech, April 2002.) c) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? (Master Environmental Assessment, Exhibit 5.9) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ("Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report, Tentative Tract No. 30378..." prepared by CRM Tech, April 2002.) VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (General Plan EIR p. III- 61 ff.) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ("Geotechnical Investigation Tentative Tract No. 30378..." prepared by Sladden Engineering, April 2002.) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? ("Geotechnical Investigation Tentative Tract No. 30378..." prepared by Sladden Engineering, April 2002.) iv) Landslides? ("Geotechnical Investigation Tentative Tract No. 30378..." prepared by Sladden Engineering, April 2002. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (General Plan Exhibit 8.4) c) Be located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? ("Geotechnical Investigation Tentative Tract No. 30378..." prepared by Sladden Engineering, April 2002.) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? ("Geotechnical Investigation Tentative Tract No. 30378..." prepared by Sladden Engineering, April 2002.) X X X X 1� X X 42 PAFRED\TT30378EACk1St.WPD i t 14 6 e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste X water? (General Plan MEA p. 96 ff) VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Application Materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Application Materials) c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Application Materials) d) Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Riverside County Hazardous Materials Listing) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip; would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (General Plan MEA p. 94 ff) h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildlands fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) Vill. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY : Would the project: a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) X X X X X X X X X X PAFRED\TT30378EACkIst.WPD 7 c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? ('Hydrology Tentative Tract No. 30378," Daniel Ferguson, PE, April 2002) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on - or off -site? ('Hydrology Tentative Tract No. 30378," Daniel Ferguson, PE, April 2002) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems to control? ('Hydrology Tentative Tract No. 30378," Daniel Ferguson, PE, April 2002) f) Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Master Environmental Assessment Exhibit 6.5) g) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment Exhibit 6.5) IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Project Description) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purposes of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan p. 18 ff.) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) X. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) PAFRED\TT30378EACk1st. W PD 8 X f� 91 X X X X I1 X X 644 ,j 10 XI. NOISE: Would the project result in: X11. XIII. a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (General Plan MEA p. 110 ff.) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (General Plan MEA p. 110 ff.) c) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan MEA p. 110 ff.) d) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Master Environmental Assessment) e) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive levels? (General Plan land use map) POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (General Plan, p. 9 ff.) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) Police protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) Schools? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) X R X 11 X X X X X X 645 PAFRED\TT30378EACkIst.WPD LI y 9 XIV. XV. XVI Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) RECREATION: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application Materials) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application Materials) TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Application Materials) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Application Materials) g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Application Materials) UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) PAFRED\TT30378EACklst. W PD 10 rA X X X 14 0 11 X X �4G k,1a c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) d) Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSIS. X X X X X X M I� Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D)• In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. No earlier analysis were used in this review. 647 ,_1 1. 3 PAFRED\TT30378EACkIst.WPD 11 b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. See attached Addendum. SOURCES: Master Environmental Assessment, City of La Quinta General Plan 2002. SCAQMD CEQA Handbook. General Plan, City of La Quinta, 2002. City -of La Quinta Municipal Code Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report, Tentative Tract No. 30378..., prepared by CRM Tech, April 2002. Geotechnical Investigation Tentative Tract No. 30378.... prepared by Sladden Engineering, April 2002. Hydrology Tentative Tract No. 30378, prepared by Daniel Ferguson, PE, April 2002. 648 PAFRED\TT30378EACkIst.WPD 12 Addendum for Environmental Assessment 2002-441 II. a) The site is currently a citrus grove. The proposed project site is surrounded by lands which have been developed on the north, south and west. Citrus groves occur to the south. The site is not mapped as locally significant farmland. The loss of 9 acres of citrus will not represent a significant impact to agriculture in the Valley. The impacts associates with agricultural resources are not expected to be significant. III. a) The proposed project will generate air pollution primarily from the operation of motor vehicles. The 8 single family homes which could be built upon the proposed parcels could generate approximately 77 trips per day'. These 77 trips could, at buildout generate the following pollutants. Running Exhaust Emissions (pounds/day) PM 10 PM 10 PM 10 CO ROC NOx Exhaust Brakes Tires 50 mph 2.78 0.1 1 0.57 -- 0.01 0.01 Daily Threshold* 550 75 100 150 Based on 77 trips/day and average trip length of 7 miles, using EMFAC7G Model provided by California Air Resources Board. Assumes catalytic light autos at 75°F. * Operational thresholds provided by SCAQMD for assistance in determining the significance of a project and the need for an EIR. The proposed project will not exceed any threshold for the generation of moving emissions, as established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District in determining the need for an EIR. The impacts to air quality relating to vehicular emissions are not expected to be significant. III. c) The Coachella Valley is a non -attainment area for PM 10 (particulate matter of 10 microns or smaller). The construction of the proposed project has the potential to generate dust, which could contribute to the PM 10 problem in the area. In order to control PM10, the City has imposed standards and requirements on development to control dust. The applicant will be required to submit a PM 10 Management Plan prior to initiation of any earth moving activity Institute of Transportation Engineers, "Trip Generation, 6th Edition," for category 210, Single Family Detached Housing. 649 P:\FRED\TT30378EA Adden.WPD 1 �' at the site. In addition, the potential impacts associated with PM10 can be mitigated by the mitigation measures below. 1. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. 2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation. 3. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. Cut and fill quantities will be balanced on site. 5. Any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. 6. Watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on -going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. 7. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. The landscaped parkway on Madison Street, the retention basins on the east side of the tract, and parkway landscaping on the north and south boundaries of the project (within and adjacent to the entry drive, and on the south side of Bonita Trail) shall be landscaped immediately following issuance of the first grading permit for the site. 8. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean up of construction -related dirt on approach routes to the site. 9. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, the impacts to air quality from buildout will not be significant. V. b) A Phase I cultural resource survey was conducted for the subject property2. 2 "Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report, Tentative Tract No. 30378...," prepared by CRM 650 Tech, April 2002. P:\FRED\TT30378EA Adden.WPD 2 V� +� The Phase I study did not identify any resources at the site. The study does, however, identify the potential for buried resources. In order to ensure that the impacts to cultural resources are mitigated to a less than significant level, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1. Monitoring by a qualified archaeologist during any trenching shall be done with a written report on the archaeological monitoring being prepared and submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission for approval prior to final inspection for the first residence or approval of tract improvements, whichever occurs first. Should any earth moving activity on the site uncover a potential archaeological resource, all activity on the site shall stop until such time as a qualified archaeologist has evaluated the resource, and recommended mitigation measures. VI. a) i) & i0 The homes at the project site, as with the rest of the City, will be subject to significant ground movement in the event of a major earthquake. The homes will be required to meet the City's standards for construction, which include Uniform Building Code requirements for seismic zones. The City Engineer will require the preparation of site -specific geotechnical analysis in conjunction with the submittal of grading plans. These requirements will ensure that impacts from ground shaking are reduced to a less than significant level. VI. b) The subject property is subject to severe wind erosion hazards. The City Engineer will require the preparation of PM 10 Management Plan to control the potential for blowing dust from the project site (please see mitigation measures under Air Quality, above). These mitigation measures will lessen the potential impacts of soil erosion to a less than significant level. VIII. b) Domestic water is provided by the Coachella Valley Water District from wells in the Lower Thermal sub -basin. Each of the homes at the project site will be required to implement the City's standards for water conserving plumbing fixtures and on -site retention, which both aid in reducing the potential impacts associated with groundwater. The proposed project will also meet the requirements of the City's water -conserving landscaping ordinance. These standards will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. VIII. c)&d) The proposed subdivision is for lots of approximately one acre in size. The homes to be placed on these lots will not represent a significant loss of permeable land, since it is likely that the majority of each lot will be landscaped. In addition, retention basins have been designed for the eastern end of the site, the handle storm flows from the 4 eastern lots. The City Engineer will require that these retention basins, and the 1 acre lots on the west half of the subdivision retain the 100 year 24 hour storm on -site. The 65 tract's drainage plan will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of grading permits. These standards will reduce the potential � � 3 P:\FRED\TT30378EA Adden.WPD 3 XI. a) impacts associated with surface water to a less than significant level. The proposed project occurs in an area with lower levels of traffic, which are not expected to exceed the City's noise standards at buildout of the General Plan. Further, the proposed houses will occur more than 100 feet west of Madison Street, with the proposed retention area providing additional buffers. A wall or walls will be constructed along the eastern property lines of the eastern lots, providing further noise reduction. It is expected that impacts to the residences from noise generated on Madison will be less than significant. XI. c) The construction of the proposed project will result in temporary high noise levels from construction equipment. The project site is located in an area which is either undeveloped, or developed in very large lots subdivisions. The distance between the proposed tract and structures on surrounding lots should provide sufficient buffer to result in less than significant impacts to the neighbors from construction noise. XIII. a) The proposed homes will have a limited impact on public services. The homes will be served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, acting under City contract. Site development will generate property tax, which will offset the costs of added police and fire services. The project area will be required to pay the mandated school fees as each home is constructed. These fees mitigate the students generated, and offset the impacts to schools. The project will be required to participate in the City's Impact Fee Program, which helps to offset roadway improvement costs. Site development is not expected to have a significant impact on municipal services or facilities. XIV. a) The addition of 8 homes will have the potential to require additional recreational space. However, the size of the proposed lots, between 0.8 and 1.01 acre each, will allow each homeowner to construct on -site recreational amenities to a higher degree than a standard subdivision. The impacts associated with the subdivision of the proposed parcel into 8 lots will not have a significant impact on recreation in the City. 65o 1 0 0 r N N 0 0 0 N N N O O N M i N 0 0 N g . °z a FBI ~ A U W d W d A U� w ax �w ox UU Q a b � b a a o S �i � v b � O u► _O p O G U O O •1 U F r U N = r U = �0- N O aU O U V 0 a a aPO a a0. onw a O a -� o AD a A c a a� (L) c AA L1 w a � w w U U U GQ U A GQ m N z O N O a O o d E : 4+. 0-4a ;�4 o 0 0 E-F 0-4 r Cd a N O C C to ►7 G O V y cd � 'C 0-4 a0-4 s 0-4 2 a W d A V� �A a� �w ox UU 0 a2 w 42 a e� o v� a G7 an � o F � c� oq A ou z E 0 �O � zz A a d UA a 0 z Ccd w cd ro b aw a o wS a U 654 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN EIGHT LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND SUBDIVISION AND MISCELLANEOUS COMMON LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 9.13 ACRES CASE NO.: TENTATIVE TRACT 30378 APPLICANT: ROD VANDENBOS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 18th day of June, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing approving a request to subdivide a 9.13 acre site into 8 single family lots and other common lots, generally located at the southwest corner of Avenue 51 and Madison Street, more particularly described as: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS: 772-270-011, 772-270- 012, & 772-270-013 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 28th day of May , 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing and recommended approval to the City Council, to subdivide a 9.13 acre site into 8 single family lots and other common lots, generally located at the southwest corner of Avenue 51 and Madison Street. WHEREAS, said tentative map has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-63), in that an Environmental Assessment was completed for this project. WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following Mandatory Findings of approval to justify said Tentative Tract Map 30378: A. The proposed map is consistent with the City of La Quinta General Plan. The project is a Very Low Density Residential (LDR) District per the provisions of the 2002 General Plan Update. Tentative Tract 30378 is consistent with the goals, policies and intent of the La Quinta General Plan provided conditions contained herein are met to ensure consistency with the General Plan, and mitigation measures pursuant to Environmental Assessment 2002-441 . The density and design standards for the tract will comply with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. 655 027 Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract Map 30378 Adopted June 18, 2002 Page 2 B. The design, or improvement of, the proposed subdivision is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan and the Subdivision Ordinance. All streets and improvements in the project conform to City standards contained in the General Plan and Subdivision Ordinance as designed. All on - site streets will be private (60-feet wide right-of-way). Access for the single family lots will be provided from an internal north/south street planned under tentative tract map. C. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, or substantially injure fish or wildlife, or their habitat. The subject site is physically suitable for the proposed land division. Therefore, this project will not cause substantial environmental damage or injury to fish or wildlife, or their habitat because mitigation measures D. The design of the subdivision, or type of improvements, are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision, as conditionally approved, will not cause serious public health problems because they will install urban improvements based on City, State, and Federal requirements. E. The design of the subdivision, or type of improvements, will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. The proposed streets are planned to provide direct access to each single family lot. All required public easements will provide access to the site or support necessary infrastructure improvements. F. The design of the lot, or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems in that the Fire Marshall, Sheriff's Department, and the City's Building and Safety Department have reviewed the proposal for public health conditions and the project is conditioned as appropriate. G. The design of the lot, or type of improvements, will not conflict with 656 Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract Map 30378 Adopted June 18, 2002 Page 3 easements acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision in that the proposed internal streets will be privately owned and maintained, and that there will be no publicly - owned improvements within the tentative tract map. WHEREAS, in the review of this Tentative Tract Map, the City Council has considered the effect of the contemplated action on housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing those needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of La Quinta and its environs with available fiscal and environmental resources; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does approve Tentative Tract 30378 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this the 18th day of June, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract Map 30378 Adopted June 18, 2002 Page 4 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 658 IS ,) RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT 30378 - ROD VANDENBOS JUNE 18, 2002 GENERAL 1 . The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Tract Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Tract Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code § § 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at http://www.la-quinta.org. 3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) • SunLine Transit Agency The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 4. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water), LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08- DWQ . T.. }3 �J AACC COA TT 30378.wpd Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 30378 - Rod Vandenbos June 18, 2002 Page 2 A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs five (5) acres or more of land, or that disturbs less than five (5) acres of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than five (5) acres of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020 (Definitions), LQMC): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All of applicant's erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off site grading being done in relation to this project. F. All approved project BMPs shall be maintained in their proper working order throughout the course of construction, and until all improvements have been accepted by the City. 5. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). PROPERTY RIGHTS 6. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to e dedica 660 A:\CC COA TT 30378.wpd Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 30378 - Rod Vandenbos June 18, 2002 Page 3 or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 7. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 8. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Madison Street - Primary Arterial, 55' ROW 9. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Final Map all private street right-of- ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 10. The private street right-of-ways to be retained for private use required for this development include: A. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Private Cul-de-sac - 60 foot right of way with 2-20' lanes and a raised median as shown on the Tentative Tract Map. B. CUL DE SACS 1) Cul-de-sac, 50' right of way at the Cul-de-sac bulb. 11 . Right-of-way geometry for standard knuckles and property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801, and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 12. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 13. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street right-of- ways shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such right-of-ways, the applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-ways within 60 days of a written request by the City. 661. AACC COA TT 30378.wpd Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 30378 - Rod Vandenbos June 18, 2002 Page 4 14. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. 15. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public right-of- ways as follows: A. Madison Street (Primary Arterial) - 20-foot from the Right of Way or property line. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 16. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 17. The applicant shall vacate all abutter's right -of -access to public streets and properties from all frontages along such public streets and properties, excepting those access points shown on the Final Map. 18. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 19. When an applicant proposes the vacation, or abandonment, of any existing right-of- way, or access easement, which will diminish the access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall provide an alternate right-of-way or access easement, to those properties, or notarized letters of consent from the affected property owners. 20. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. 66? J3 AACC COA TT 30378.wpd Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 30378 - Rod Vandenbos June 18, 2002 Page 5 FINAL MAPS 20. Prior to the City's approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCAD files of the Final Map that was approved by the City's map checker on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. Such files shall be in a standard AutoCAD format so as to be fully retrievable into a basic AutoCAD program. Where a Final Map was not produced in an AutoCAD format, or produced in a file that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept a raster - image file of such Final Map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 21. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans), LQMC. 22. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. Participate in, and pay for, a fair share portion of the offsite street design improvements B. Perimeter Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' C. On -Site Street Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical D. On -Site Rough Grading Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal E. On -Site Precise Grading Plan: 1 " = 30' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. A:\CC COA TT 30378.wpd Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 30378 - Rod Vandenbos June 18, 2002 Page 6 All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. 23. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City Resolution, the applicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes from the City. 24. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 25. Prior to the conditional approval of any Final Map, or the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 26. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Tract Map, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security), LQMC. 27. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the propo improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentatiZ�n. U.3O A:\CC COA TT 30378.wpd Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 30378 - Rod Vandenbos June 18, 2002 Page 7 28. Depending on the timing of the development of this Tentative Tract Map, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: (1) construct certain off -site improvements, (2) construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others, (3) reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this tentative tract map, (4) secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others, or (5) to agree to any combination of these means, as the City may require. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 29. When improvements are to be secured through a SIA, and prior to any conditional approval of the Final Map by the City Council, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off -site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution, or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit costs shall be approved by the City Engineer. At the time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for conditional approval of the Final Map by the City Council, the applicant shall also submit one copy each of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " reduction of each page of the Final Map, along with a copy of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " Vicinity Map. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. 30. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 665 AACC COA TT 30378.wpd Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 30378 - Rod Vandenbos June 18, 2002 Page 8 GRADING 31. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 32. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 33. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, and C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on the Final Map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. 34. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 35. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 36. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus three tenths of a foot from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Staff for a substantial conformance finding review. 37. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor. 6 s E A:\CC COA TT 30378.wpd '' Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 30378 - Rod Vandenbos June 18, 2002 Page 9 Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. 38. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), LQMC, Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. The design storm shall be either the 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 39. The applicant shall meet the individual -lot retention provisions of Chapter 13.24.120 (Drainage), sub -section "K.", LQMC. Stormwater shall normally be retained in common retention basin(s) as shown on the Tentative Tract Map. Individual lot basins or other retention concepts may be approved by the City Engineer for lots 1 acre in size or larger or where the use of common retention is determined by the City Engineer to be impracticable. If individual lot retention is approved, the applicant shall meet all individual lot retention provisions of Chapter 13.24, LQMC. A drainage easement shall be conveyed to the Homeowners Association for the individual lot retention areas to insure that the integrity and size of each basin is maintained. 40. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rete shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise. 41. Nuisance water shall be retained on site through an acceptable manner as approved by the City Engineer. 42. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 43. For on -site common retention basins, retention depth shall not exceed six feet and side slopes shall not exceed 3:1. For retention basins on individual lots, retention depth shall not exceed two feet. 44. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback 667 A:\CC COA TT 30378.wpd '1Q3 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 30378 - Rod Vandenbos June 18, 2002 Page 10 and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to Section 9.100.040(B)(7), LQMC. 45. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries, levels or frequencies in any area outside the development. 46. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 47. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. UTILITIES 48. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.110 (Utilities), LQMC. 49. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 50. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 51. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 52. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access For Individual Properties And Development), LQMC for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 668 A:\CC COA TT 30378.wpd �' 4J Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 30378 - Rod Vandenbos June 18, 2002 Page 11 53. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1 /8" batter and a minimum height of 0.1'. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 54. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Madison Street (Primary Arterial) - 55' R/W: Widen the west side of the street along the frontage adjacent to the Tentative Tract Map boundary. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. These improvements may be deferred to be completed with future Madison Street Improvements. Other significant new improvements required for installation in, or adjacent, to the subject right of way include: (a) A 6-foot wide meandering sidewalk. The 6 foot wide meandering sidewalk shall be completed with the Tract Improvements the unless the applicant provides assurance to the City of La Quinta that the City of Indio will provide a 6 foot wide sidewalk on the east side of Madison Street. A 10-foot wide meandering trail. The 10' wide trail shall be completed with the Tract Improvements. (b) 18' foot wide landscaped median along the frontage adjacent to the boundary of the Tentative Tract Map (deferred improvement to be constructed by others). The applicant shall complete the following improvements with the Tract Improvements: 669, Al. A:\CC COA TT 30378.wpd Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 30378 - Rod Vandenbos June 18, 2002 Page 12 a) Landscape the parkway area up to the existing edge of pavement. b) The existing overhead electrical system shall be undergrounded along the Tract frontage. c) Interim street improvements including asphalt tapers and signing/striping is required to tie Beth Circle into Madison Street. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Beth Circle and Cul-de-Sac Street - Construct full improvements within a 60-foot right-of-way, which shall be divided into two 20-foot traveled ways with a 10-foot center landscaped median (Entry Street) and an 18-foot center median (cul-de-sac street) as shown on the Tentative Map. The median island on Beth Circle at the Madison Street entrance shall be designed to direct traffic to the right to facilitate a right turn only movement. Appropriate signing and striping shall be provided. The design of the median island and associated signing and striping shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. C. PRIVATE CUL DE SACS 1) Private Cul-de-sacs shall be constructed to Riverside County Standard 800 for symmetrical Cul-de-sacs and Standard 8O0A for offset Cul-de-sacs, and both shall be constructed with a 50-foot curb radius, measured gutter flow -line to gutter flow -line. 55. All gated entries shall provide for a two -car minium stacking capacity for inbound traffic; and shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non -entry accepted vehicles.) Where a gated entry is proposed, the applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a scale of 1 " = 10', demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry into the development can safely make a "U" Turn back out onto Madison Street. The applicant shall submit written authorization from the property owner to the south of Beth Circle acknowledging and consenting to placing the proposed gate on Beth Circle. Two lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of each gated entry, one lane shall be dedicated for residents, and one lane for visitors. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved %1) A:\CC COA TT 30378.wpd Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 30378 - Rod Vandenbos June 18, 2002 Page 13 construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 56. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential Collector Secondary Arterial Primary Arterial Major Arterial 3.0" a.c./4.50" c.a.b. 4.0"/5.00" 4.0"/6.00" 4.5"/6.00" 5.5"/6.50" or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 57. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Primary Entry (Beth Circle): Right in, right out and left in, only. Left out turning movement is prohibited. The entry median on Beth Circle and Madison Street shall be designed to direct traffic to the right to facilitate a right turn only movement as outlined in Condition No. 57. 58. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 59. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 60. Standard knuckles and corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 61. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements. 671 ,43 A:\CC COA TT 30378.wpd Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 30378 - Rod Vandenbos June 18, 2002 Page 14 CONSTRUCTION 62. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphaltic concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include the test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include the most recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that the design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs have been approved. 63. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPING 64. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC. 65. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. 66. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit the landscape plans for approval by the Community Development Department (CDD), prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking has been completed by CDD, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner, prior to submittal for signature by the City Engineer. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 67. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 18 inches of curbs along public streets fiT' 144 A:\CC COA TT 30378.wpd Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 30378 - Rod Vandenbos June 18, 2002 Page 15 PUBLIC SERVICES 68. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. QUALITY ASSURANCE 69. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 70. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 71. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that the construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. 72. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing," "As -Built" or "As - Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. MAINTENANCE 73. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 74. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. FEES AND DEPOSITS 75. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 673 A5 AACC COA TT 30378.wpd Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract 30378 - Rod Vandenbos June 18, 2002 Page 16 FIRE MARSHALL 76. Approved standard hydrants, located at each intersection and spaced 330 feet apart with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for a 2-hour duration at 20 PSI. 77. Blue dot reflectors shall be placed in the street 8 inches from centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 78. Gate entrances shall be at least two feet wider than the width of the travel lanes, serving that gate. Any gate providing access from a road to a driveway shall be located at least 35 feet setback from the roadway and shall open to allow a vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic lane provides access to a gate entrance, a 40-foot turning radius shall be used. 79. Gates shall be equipped with a rapid entry system (KNOX). Gate pins shall be rated with a shear pin force, not to exceed 30 pounds. Gates activated by the rapid entry system shall remain open until closed by the rapid entry system. Contact the Fire Department for an application. 80. Provide to the Fire Department, 2 sets of water plans for plan check prior to recordation. 81. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior tp any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. MISCELLANEOUS 82. Privacy walls (minimum of 5' in height) shall be constructed around the entire perimeter of the project. The existing chain link shall be removed at prior to the privacy wall. 83. At a minimum, at least two rows of existing citrus trees shall be preserved in place along the Madison Street perimeter of the project, and one row of existing citrus trees shall be preserved in place along the north perimeter of the project.. 674 AACC COA TT 30378.wpd ATTACHMENT #1 z W 11 VL/VVL PROJECT LOCATION MAP 1375 4J ATTACHMENT #3 8a• ��a 21.��.� r3.a.ZQ ei Ir 414 47-4ie-fr. /�.�a irinvn� . L RECEIVED 71'Y9S" Ce De...%a..rya.cc� Mp`122 2 i J �"'iz. •..-t�i�t.�' yo awc�� .�c�L� ...e�o� .-e�ss� T/� /7 7'�„urrcc�.� �c��--�-�t, �,��d �.�• �a�rzoCr��•Go�a.� �.ca�rcr� Ze. Q-.t 4-mla� 1376 i_l' 4 3 �Cs-Gi ..z-.� GS .� . � �i .--ft�Ct�oi 0�2.ccj •!G ;Y1� i�L��• d ccirz oC .�sic� .� y �ctr�CG f 7'7 ,r_ v0 ATTACHMENT #4 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 7. It was moved and seconded by Co issioners Butler/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolut' 2002-060 recommend approval of Site Development Per 002-736, subject to the findings and conditions as amend . A. Condi ' n #16: Delete the sentence regarding plan check ti g. ROLL C : AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. F. Environmental Assessment 2002-441 and _Tentative Tract Map 30378 —� a request of Rod Vandenbos for Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and approval to subdivide 9.13 acres into 8 residential lots and other common lots located at the southwest corner of Avenue 51 and Madison Street. 1 . Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Fred Baker presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked why the applicant was responsible for the full width and not the half width of the street in Condition #8, #56. Staff would correct the conditions to only require 55 feet on the west side. Commissioner Tyler asked if "Beth Circle" was the proposed name for the access off of Madison Street. Staff stated that is the existing name of the street. The applicant will be applying for a street name change at a later date. The site is mapped and recorded but there are no streets. Commissioner Tyler asked about the issues raised in the letter from Mrs. McGinty. Staff stated some of the issues are at the Commission's discretion. In regard to the partially finished building, it is a permitted storage building. Commissioner Tyler asked if the property is rezoned, is the second building permitted. Staff stated the applicant intends to convert the building to a guest house or garage. 08 ,j5l. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 14 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 3. Commissioner Kirk asked what justification does the City have to require the applicant to retain the citrus. Staff stated the applicant has stated his desire to do so, therefore staff conditioned it. The first row and maybe the second row is intended to be integrated into the setback landscaping. Commissioner Kirk asked if the City could do this if it was not a mitigation measure. Staff stated yes. 4. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Rod Vandenbos, 79-110 Christian Court, the applicant, gave a presentation on the project. 5. Commissioner Tyler asked if the trees abutting the Green Valley Ranches development would be retained. Mr. Vandenbos stated the goal is to keep as many of the trees as possible, but several are damaged and not worth retaining. He is working with the neighbors to resolve the issues. The "agricultural building" is being finalized and will be used for farming equipment and supplies. 6. Mr. David Turner, Coachella Valley Engineers, questioned Conditions #8 which has now been addressed by staff. Condition #22. A., B., & C they would like to request "bonded for" rather than "prepared". Condition #36 they need some flexibility in regard to the pad heights to allow them to retain as many of the trees as possible. Conditions #42 and #45 they would like to request the maximum percolation rate be four to six inches per hour rather than two inches and the retention depth not exceed four feet. Condition #56.A.1.a.b. if a six foot meandering sidewalk and 14 foot multipurpose they would not be able to retain as many trees. They would like to request waiting to see what the City of Indio requires for across the street and work in conjunction with them. Condition #56.B and #60 they would like to request the same, see what the City of Indio requires across the street. They would like some flexibility in regard to the turning movements. Condition #66 they would like to have deleted. 7. Commissioner Butler asked if the street improvements would be bonded for future construction of the streets. Mr. Turner stated yes. Commissioner Butler asked the reason for the right turn restriction. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated it is required by the General Plan. In regard to the turning movement, staff would be willing to wait to see what develops on the other side of the 6 7 street. ,� rJ G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 15 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 8. Commissioner Tyler asked if there was any conservative effort with the City of Indio to design this street. Staff stated there was none not at this time. 9. Commissioner Kirk asked about the retention basins and percolation rates. Staff stated the percolation rate, size, and depth are determined by City Ordinance. If you do on -site, on -lot retention, the Ordinance calls for the lots to be no smaller than two and one half acres. The intent is to keep it shallow to keep it safe. 10. Commissioner Tyler asked about the pad height. Staff stated there are no pads. Discussion followed regarding the pad elevations. Mr. Vandenbos stressed the need to have a full movement. Staff stated the only way it can be changed is with a General Plan Amendment 11. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion. 12. Commissioner Tyler stated at this time this street is not a major street. He asked if a General Plan Amendment could be applied for to address the entry. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated it would require amending the General Plan. 13. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-061 recommending to the City Council Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-441, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. 14. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-062, recommend approval of Tentative Tract Map 30378, subject to the findings and conditions as amended: -53 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 16 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 A. Condition #8: the applicant shall construct 55 foot half width B. Condition #22.A.: The applicant shall contribute to the design cost. C. Condition #22.B: Delete. D. Condition #22.C: The applicant shall construct the perimeter landscaping E. Conditions #36 & 37: Delete F. Condition #56A.1.a.b.: The applicant shall construct a 10- foot multipurpose trail. G. Condition #87: Preserve one row of existing citrus trees on the north perimeter of the project. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. H. Site Development Permit 2001-721; a request of Coachella Petroleum, nc. for consideration of a shade structure for a vehicle service area I ated at 78-988 Highway 111 (Jiffy Lube). 1. hairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff rep rt. Associate Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the infor contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in thA�Cmunity Development Department. 2. Chairman Ab asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Ty asked if the shade structure would be visible from Adams Street. taff stated yes. 3. There being no further publi comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion o e public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussio 4. There being no further discussion, it wa oved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt nning Commission Resolution 2002-063, approving Site Develop ent Permit 2002- 721, as recommended. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. yJ 1 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 17 T4ht 4 4 Qu&Z COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing on 1) Certification of an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 232; 2) Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-447; and 3) Zone Change 2002-107, to Allow the Annexation of Approximately 640 Acres into the City, Located Between Avenue 60, Avenue 62, Madison Street and Monroe Street. Applicant: Shea Homes RECOMMENDATIONS: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 232 (SCH#2000091023) prepared for Zone Change 2002-107, Pre -annexation Zoning for Specific Plan 218, Amendment No. 1; 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-447 prepared for Zone Change 2002-107 3. Motion to take up Ordinance No. by title and number only and waive further reading. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. on first reading to allow pre -zoning designations on 640 acres for annexation into the City. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. CCstfrptshea.wpd 1 17 0 BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Planning Commission Action On May 28, 2002, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider environmental documents and zone changes requested from Shea Homes to assign pre -zoning designations to approximately 640 acres for annexation into the City of La Quinta. After discussion, the Planning Commission voted 4-0-1 to adopt Resolutions recommending to the City Council certification of the environmental documents and approval of the Zone Change. A copy of the Planning Commission meeting minutes and staff report are attached (Attachments 1 and 2). Site Background The applicant, Shea Homes, is requesting annexation of approximately 640 acres into the City of La Quinta. The proposed annexation area is located outside the existing City limits and Sphere of Influence and is bounded by Avenue 60 to the north, Avenue 62 to the south, Madison Street to the west and Monroe Street to the east (Attachment 3). Prior to annexation, the City requires that General Plan and Pre -Zoning designations be established to City standards. The proposed annexation area currently has General Plan Land Use designations based on the recently adopted General Plan Update, therefore, no General Plan Amendment is required. These General Plan Land Uses include Low Density Residential, Medium High Density Residential, Golf Course, and Open Space (Attachment 4). Existing Riverside County Zoning designations for the same area are Specific Plan (SP), Residential Agriculture (RA) and Controlled Development (W-2). These are proposed to be changed to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Golf Course, and Open Space for consistency with the General Plan designations (Attachment 5). A majority of the proposed annexation area has an existing approved Specific Plan (SP218, Amendment No.1) and certified Environmental Impact Report (No. 232) under Riverside County for residential and golf course development. The Specific Plan was the original Coral Mountain Specific Plan development project on 1,280 acres. The current application covers approximately 525 acres of the original 1,280 acres and is currently being graded under permits from Riverside County. The Shea Homes project is called "Trilogy" and consists of approximately 1,203 single-family homes, and an 18 hole golf course with clubhouse and recreational facilities. ccstfrptshea.wpd 2 6 8 _ 1302 The remaining 115 acres of the proposed annexation area consists of vacant land, a few single-family homes, a small date farm, and a dike. While this area is proposed as part of the annexation application, it has no development plans currently under consideration. These lands are proposed to remain in an "as is" condition and are not part of the Trilogy project. Public Agency Review Staff sent a copy of the applicant's request to all public agencies and City Departments on April 11, 2002. All written comments received are on file with the Community Development Department. Public Notice This project was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on June 8, 2002, and mailed to all property owners within 500-feet of the site. To date, no letters have been received. Any written comments received will be handed out at the meeting. Environmental Assessment The Shea Homes property has an existing certified EIR for the approved Specific Plan (SP218, Amendment No.1) under Riverside County. Staff has prepared an Addendum to this EIR for annexation of the Shea Homes property only, which lies within the original Coral Mountain Specific Plan area. The Community Development Department has determined that although the proposed Zone Change 2002-107 could have a significant adverse effect on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards; and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures imposed upon the project. Therefore, the Addendum to that EIR should be certified. In addition, staff also prepared an Initial Study for the remaining 115 acres of the proposed annexation area and determined that although the proposed project could have a significant adverse effect on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because appropriate mitigation measures were made a part of the assessment. Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be certified. ccstfrptshea.wpd 3 ` Q 6 0 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The findings for the request outlined in Sections 9.220.010 and 9.230.020 of the Zoning Code can be made and are contained in the attached Resolutions. Alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, certifying an addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 232 (SCH#2000091023) prepared for Zone Change 2002-107, Pre -annexation Zoning for Specific Plan 218, Amendment No. 1; Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-447 prepared for Zone Change 2002-107; Motion to take up Ordinance No. by title and number only and waive further reading. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. on first reading; or 2. Direct staff to prepare Resolutions modifying the Planning Commission's decisions; or 3. Deny the project and direct staff to draft resolutions for denial; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Herma , Community Development Director Approved for submission by: homas P. Genovese, City Manager CCstfrptshea.wpd 4 685 t, 4 Attachments: 1. May 28, 2002, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 2. May 28, 2002, Planning Commission Staff Report 3. Location Map 4. Existing General Plan Land Uses 5. Existing Riverside County Zoning And Proposed City Zoning Map CCstfrptshea.wpd 5 686 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING AN ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 232 (SCH#2000091023) PREPARED FOR ZONE CHANGE 2002- 107, PRE -ANNEXATION ZONING FOR SPECIFIC PLAN 218, AMENDMENT NO. 1 CASE: RIVERSIDE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 232 APPLICANT: SHEA HOMES WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 28th day of May, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to recommend to the City Council certification of an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #232 (SCH#2000091023) for Zone Change 2002-107 for Pre -annexation Zoning designations for Specific Plan 218, Amendment No. 1 located west of Madison Avenue, east of Monroe Avenue, south of Avenue 60 and north of Avenue 62, and more particularly described as follows: APNs: 764-270-001, 002, 004, 017 & 018; and 764-280-016. WHEREAS, said Addendum has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-68), in that the Community Development Department has determined that although the proposed Zone Change 2002-107 could have a significant adverse effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the project, nothing further is required. WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following findings to justify recommending certification of said Addendum: 1. The proposed Zone Change 2002-107 will not be detrimental to public health, safety or general welfare of the community, either directly to indirectly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by the Addendum. 2. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Proposed Project will be undertaken, which will require major modifications or revisions to the Prior EIR, due to the involvement of ne significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects. 687 M PAMartin\Shea Homes -Trilogy= Reso Addendum.wpd CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- RIVERSIDE COUNTY EIR ADDENDUM SHEA HOMES -TRILOGY ADOPTED: JUNE 18, 2002 3. No new information of substantial importance which was not known, and could not have been known, with the exercise of reasonable diligence, at the time the Final EIR was adopted, has become available which shows any of the bases described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3), for requiring a Subsequent EIR or Supplemental EIR. 4. Based on these findings and the Addendum, the City has determined that no Subsequent EIR or Supplemental EIR is required or appropriate under Public Resources Code Section 21166, and that an Addendum is sufficient to make the prior EIR apply to the Proposed Project. 5. The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 6. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends in that mitigation measures are imposed on the project that will reduce impacts to less than significant levels. 7. The proposed project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Addendum. 8. The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. 9. The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 10. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment in that mitigation measures are imposed on the project that will reduce impacts to a less than significant level. 11. The City Council has considered the Addendum to Riverside Count Environmental Impact Report No. 232 (SCH#2000091023) and the Addendum 6 g reflects the independent judgement of the City. P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\CC Reso Addendum.wpd CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- RIVERSIDE COUNTY EIR ADDENDUM SHEA HOMES -TRILOGY ADOPTED: JUNE 18, 2002 12. The City has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effects set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 13. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council for this Addendum. 2. That it does hereby certify the Addendum to Riverside County Environmental Impact Report No. 232 (SCH#2000091023) for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Addendum on file in the Community Development Department and attached hereto. 3. That the Addendum to Riverside County Environmental Impact Report No. 232 reflects the independent judgement of the City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 18th day of June, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\CC Reso Addendum.wpd CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- RIVERSIDE COUNTY EIR ADDENDUM SHEA HOMES -TRILOGY ADOPTED: JUNE 18, 2002 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\CC Reso Addendum.wpd ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (CEQA GUIDELINE 15164) FOR ZONE CHANGE 2002-107 FOR PRE -ANNEXATION APPLICATION FOR A PORTION OF THE CORAL MOUNTAIN SPECIFIC PLAN, NO. 218, AMENDMENT NO. 1 69.1 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EIRAdden.WPD 1 1 yl The City of La Quinta, as lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code section 21000, et seq. C'CEQA") has prepared this Addendum pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15164. This is an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #232 CEIR") that the County of Riverside certified in 1999 for the Coral Mountain Specific Plan, SP 218, Amendment #1. The purpose of this Addendum is to document the annexation of the project to the City of La Quinta, which will be implemented through the following land use approvals: ZONE CHANGE 2002-107 This is referred to as "the Revised Project." All mitigation measures included in EIR 232 and AEIR 232 are incorporated into this document by this reference. It is assumed for purposes of this analysis, that all the mitigation measures required within Riverside County's jurisdiction would also be required by the City. The Revised Project consists of 525 acres of the total 1,280 acres included in the Coral Mountain Specific Plan SP/EIR 218, Amendment #1. The Revised Project will result in the annexation of the southern portion of the Specific Plan area into the City of La Quinta. The City's General Plan identifies 232 acres of Medium High Density Residential and 293 acres designated Golf Course. The City has determined that the proposed residential development will be consistent with the density and character of the adjacent residential development, and will be consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City's General Plan and Specific Plan 218, Amendment #1, as approved by the County in 1999. The Revised Project does not propose any change to the land uses proposed in Specific Plan 218, Amendment #1. Only annexation of the site, and associated pre - annexation land use and zoning designations, are being considered at this time. The Specific Plan allows 18 holes of golf, a practice range, a golf clubhouse, a homeowners' clubhouse, a tennis center on approximately 293 acres, and 1,203 residential units on approximately 232 acres. Since General Plan designations have been assigned to the property under consideration, the only approval requested is: 1. Zone Change to change the designation on 232 acres currently designated Medium High Density Residential under the Specific Plan to Medium Density Residential, and 293 acres to Golf Course on land designated Open Space and Commercial in the Specific Plan; The City has compared the impacts of the Revised Project with those impacts analyzed in the EIR and finds as follows: 69? rII PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EIRAdden.WPD 2 Aesthetics - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. Annexation of the proposed land will not result in any change in the buildout of the property. The residential units, golf course and clubhouses are consistent with those currently permitted and constructed in other areas of the City under the City's General Plan. The proposed building style and architecture within the annexation area is of substantially the same character as those existing in the City and encouraged in the General Plan. Hazards and Hazardous Materials - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The annexation action will have no impact on hazardous materials; the residents of the proposed project will participate in the City's household hazardous waste disposal programs. Public Services - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The annexation of the property will be served by the Riverside County Sheriff and Fire Department, under the City's service contracts. The contract costs may increase for the City, but will be offset by revenues generated by property tax throughout the site, and sales tax at the golf and tennis clubhouses, and generated by the increased population within the City. School fees will be paid regardless of which jurisdiction is responsible for construction of the project. Parks will be constructed within the Specific Plan, and golf course lands will surround the homes. 693 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EIRAdden.WPD 3 Agriculture Resources - Impacts no greater than previously analyzed. The development of the approved Specific Plan will result in a loss of lands designated as Prime Farmland in the County General Plan. The annexation of the property will not change the previously analyzed impacts to agriculture. Air Quality - Impacts identical to those previously analyzed. No changes to the project are proposed as part of the annexation. The Air Quality analysis in the EIR reviewed the same levels and types of development as are currently planned. Hydrology and Water Quality - Impacts no greater than previously analyzed. The City requires the implementation of both NPDES standards and 100 year storm retention in proposed project construction. All construction on the proposed annexation area will be required to conform to these standards. Land Use Planning - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The annexation represents a logical extension of urbanization for the City. The project is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the Land Use Element of the City General Plan and the Specific Plan, as amended, and continues the development pattern envisioned in the General Plan. Recreation - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. Annexation of the project will not affect the golf course planned for the proposed project area. Additional park lands are proposed in other parts of the Specific Plan. These facilities will be provided regardless of the jurisdiction in which they occur, and will offset the need for such facilities created by future development. Transportation/Traffic - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The development potential of the annexation lands are the same as were analyzed in the EIR, insofar as the land use designations are consistent. The proposed project results in a slight reduction in the total number of residential units to be constructed on the site, so that it is likely that the impacts will be slightly less than analyzed in the EIR. 6911 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EIRAdden.WPD 4 il;13 Biological Resources - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The annexation action will have no direct impact on biological resources. The mitigation measures included in the EIR, including potential for additional surveys, will be implemented by the City. Cultural Resources - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. Although the annexation action, in and of itself, will have no impact on cultural resources, the potential impacts associated with buildout of the proposed project were analyzed in the EIR, and mitigation measures included. These will be implemented by the City. Geology and Soils - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The impacts of development of the proposed project were analyzed in the EIR, and will not change as a result of annexation. Mitigation measures included in the EIR will be implemented by the City. Mineral Resources - Not applicable. Noise - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The annexation action, in and of itself, will not impact the noise environment at the project site. The buildout of the project, as analyzed in the EIR, included mitigation measures which will be implemented by the City. Utilities and Service Systems - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. Annexation will have no impact on utilities and service systems. The buildout of the proposed project was analyzed in the EIR, and mitigation measures included, which the City will implement. Population and Housing - Impacts less than those previously analyzed. The annexation action, in and of itself, will have no impact on population and housing. The number of units proposed under the Specific Plan has been reduced with the proposed project, and impacts are expected to also be slightly reduced. 695 .,14 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EIRAdden.WPD 5 The City finds that consideration of the Revised Project does not call for the preparation of a subsequent EIR pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15162 or Public Resources Code Section 21166, in that the Revised Project does not involve: 1. substantial changes to the project analyzed in the EIR which would involve new significant effects on the environment or substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts; 2. substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which would involve new significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the EIR; or 3. new information of substantial importance which would involve new significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the EIR substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts. 69 12 PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EIRAdden.WPD 6 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-447 PREPARED FOR ZONE CHANGE 2002-107. CASE NO.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-447 APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 28th day of May, 2002 hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to recommend to the City Council certification of Environmental Assessment 2002-447 for Zone Change 2002-107 for Pre -annexation Zoning designations of lands located west of Madison Avenue, east of Monroe Avenue, south of Avenue 60 and north of Avenue 62, and more particularly described as follows: APNs: 764-270-005, 015; 764-280-001 thru 007, and 014. WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study (EA 2002-447) and has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because appropriate mitigation measures were made a part of the assessment and included in the conditions of approval and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following findings to justify recommending certification of said Environmental Assessment: 1. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2002-447. 2. The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the 697 potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends in that mitigation measures are imposed on the project that will reduce impacts to less than significant levels. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-447 SHEA HOMES -TRILOGY ADOPTED: JUNE 18, 2002 4. The proposed project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. 5. The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. 6. The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment in that mitigation measures are imposed on the project that will reduce impacts to a less than significant level. 8. The City Council has fully considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the comments received hereon. 9. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253. 10. A Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP), a copy of which is attached is hereby adopted pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 in order to assure compliance with the mitigation measures during Project implementation. 11. The City Council has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 12. The Community Development Director shall cause to be filed with the County Clerk a Notice of Determination pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15075(a). NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council for this Environmental Assessment. 698 .17A P:\Martin\Shea Homes -Trilogy= Reso EA 02-447.wpd CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-447 SHEA HOMES -TRILOGY ADOPTED: JUNE 18, 2002 2. That it does hereby certify the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2002-447 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum on file in the Community Development Department and attached hereto. 3. That Environmental Assessment 2002-447 reflects the independent judgement of the City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 181h day of June, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 9 .17B P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\CC Reso EA 02-447.wpd Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Zone Change 2002-107, Pre -Annexation Zoning 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Martin Magana, 760-777-7125 4. Project Location: Non-contiguous lots in Section 34, T.6S., R.7E., located between Madison Street And Monroe Street, and Between Avenue 60 and Avenue 62 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of La Quinta 478-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 6. General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential (approximately 84 acres) and Open Space (approximately 31 acres). 7. Zoning: Current: W-2 (Controlled Development) and Residential Agriculture. Proposed: Low Density Residential and Open Space. 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Pre -Annexation Zoning designations are requested for lands currently in unincorporated Riverside County. A parallel application has been made for a portion of lands in the Coral Mountain Specific Plan, located in Section 34, T.6S., R.7E. This request for pre -annexation zoning encompassed the balance of the lands in this section which are not located in the Specific Plan. Approximately 31 acres are currently zoned Agriculture in the County (located at the centerline of the section, on its eastern boundary), and 86 acres are zoned W-2, controlled development (located north and south of the centerline of the section, along its western boundary). Approximately 31 acres within the W-2 zoned lands include the Bureau of Reclamation flood control levee. The total annexation area is 115 acres. PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings. North: Vacant desert lands, agriculture, Coral Mountain Specific Plan South: Agriculture, Open Space West: Open Space, flood control levee East: Coral Mountain Specific Plan, agriculture 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Not applicable P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD 2 J, Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology and Soils Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. n ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. S afore Date P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD 3 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (6.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, `Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analysis are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. The analysis of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance 703 PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD 4 I. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: AESTHETICS: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (General Plan EIR p. III-159 ff.) b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (General Plan EIR p. III-159 ff.) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials) II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES:. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Dept. Of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (General Plan EIR p. III-21 ff.) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to nonagricultural use? (Aerial photographs) III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact X X X X a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Project Description) 94 X X X 91 X 11 0 `3 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD 5 n e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X (Project Description) IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) c) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) Either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (La Quinta Municipal Code; General Plan) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Cotnmunity Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 122 ff.) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resources (i.e., an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 122 ff.) c) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? (Master Environmental Assessment, Exhibit 5.9) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (Master Environmental Assessment, P. 122 ff.) PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD X 94 X M X F.7 M X VA X 705 S! 2 VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (General Plan EIR p. III-61 ff.) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (General Plan EIR p. III-61 ff.) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (General Plan EIR p. III-61 ff.) iv) Landslides? (General Plan MEA p. 96 ff) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (General Plan MEA p. 96 ff) c) Be located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on - or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (General Plan MEA p. 96 ff) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (General Plan MEA p. 96 ff) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (General Plan MEA p. 96 ff) VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: X X X X X X X X a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Application Materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Application Materials) c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Application Materials) d) Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Riverside County Hazardous Materials Listing) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD R, X KI KI G4 �06 J 2 .1 VIII. IX. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip; would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (General Plan MEA p. 94 ff) h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildlands fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off - site? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems to control? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) f) Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Master Environmental Assessment Exhibit 6.5) g) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede of redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment Exhibit 6.5) LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Project Description) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purposes of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan p. 18 ff.) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) X X X X X X X X X X X X X P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD 8 X. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: hm XII. XIII. a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) NOISE: Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (General Plan MEA p. 110 ff.) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (General Plan MEA p. 110 ff.) c) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan MEA p. 110 ff.) d) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 110 ff.) e) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive levels? (General Plan land use map) POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (General Plan, p. 9 ff.) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD 9 X X X M M X 191 X X -J 708 J4-0 Police protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) Schools? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) XIV. RECREATION: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application Materials) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application Materials) XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Application Materials) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Application Materials) g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Application Materials) XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Dn J P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD 10 d) Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSIS. R. X 91 X X Fq /11 Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. Environmental Impact Report 232, Coral Mountain Specific Plan. No earlier analysis were used in this review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. See attached Addendum. PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD 11 SOURCES: Master Environmental Assessment, City of La Quinta General Plan 2002. SCAQMD CEQA Handbook. General Plan, City of La Quinta, 2002. General Plan Environmental Impact Report, 2002. City of La Quinta Municipal Code 711 PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD 12 Addendum for Environmental Assessment 2002-447 Il. a) Approximately 31 acres of the annexation area is currently designated Agriculture under County Zoning. This area of the County is designated as Prime Farmland in the County General Plan. The annexation itself will have no impact on this designation. Should the 31 acres eventually be developed under the Low Density Residential Designation, the land would be lost to agriculture. The 31 acres is currently divided into a 19.4 and a 9.33 acre parcel, and is surrounded on three sides (north, south and west) by the Coral Mountain Specific Plan, which is under construction at this time. The parcels are therefore isolated, and do not represent a long term valuable resource for agriculture in the area. The impacts to agricultural resources are therefore not expected to be significant. III. a) The annexation itself will not result in any impact to air quality. The buildout of the lands, however, would result in up to 336 single family residential units on 84 acres. These single family units will generate approximately 3,216 trips per day on the regional roadway system', which will generate emissions which have an impact on the air quality in the area. Based on this trip generation, the project at buildout will generate the following pollutants. Running Exhaust Emissions (pounds/day) PM10 PM10 PM10 CO ROC NOx Exhaust Brakes Tires 50 mph 116.29 4.47 23.85 -- 0.50 0.50 Daily Threshold 550 75 100 150 Based on 3,216 trips/day and average trip length of 7 miles, using EMFAC7G Model provided by California Air Resources Board. Assumes catalytic light autos at 75°F. * Operational thresholds provided by SCAQMD for assistance in determining the significance of a project and the need for an EIR. 1 "Trip Generation, Sixth Edition," Institute of Transportation Engineers, for category 210, Single -Family Detached Housing. 712 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EAAdden.WPD 1 The buildout of the annexation area will not exceed any threshold for the generation of moving emissions, as established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District in determining the need for an EIR. The impacts to air quality relating to chemical pollution are not expected to be significant. III. c) The Coachella Valley is a non -attainment area for PM 10 (particulate matter of 10 microns or smaller). The annexation of the area will not have an impact on PM 10 generation, in and of itself. The buildout of the area, however, which will result in the construction of 336 residential units, has the potential to generate dust, which could contribute to the PM 10 problem. In order to control PM 10, the City has imposed standards and requirements on development to control dust. The applicant will be required to submit a PM 10 Management Plan prior to initiation of any earth moving activity at the site. In addition, the potential impacts associated with PM 10 can be mitigated by the mitigation measures below. 1. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. 2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation during construction on any portion of the annexation area. 3. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. Cut and fill quantities will be balanced on each parcel as construction occurs. 5. Any portion of a parcel to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. 6. Watering of any parcel or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on -going basis after the initiation of any grading activity. Portions of any parcel that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. 7. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. As projects are proposed within the annexation area, the Community Development Department shall impose conditions of approval which require landscaping of parkways, open areas and front yards as part of the first phase of any project. 713 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EAAdden.WPD 2 7 3 8. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean up of construction -related dirt on approach routes. 9. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, the impacts to air quality from buildout of the annexation area will not be significant. IV. a) The annexation of the properties being considered for annexation will not have an impact on biological resources. The buildout of the area, however, could have a potentially significant impact on several sensitive species. The City's General Plan identifies the annexation lands on the western boundary of the Section as potential habitat for desert tortoise, Palm Springs pocket mouse, and Palm Springs ground squirrel. In order to ensure that the impacts to these species are less than significant, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1. Any parcel within the annexation area which proposes development shall be required to perform focused biological species for all species shown as potentially occurring in the area, according to the General Plan biological resource exhibits in place at the time development is proposed (currently exhibits 5.2 through 5.8, inclusive). V. b) The annexation area and the City occur in an area of considerable archaeological significance. The buildout of the annexation area could therefore result in significant impacts without mitigation. In order to ensure that the impacts to cultural resources are mitigated to a less than significant level, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1. Any parcel within the annexation area which proposes development shall be required to submit Phase I cultural resource surveys performed according to City standards in force at the time development occurs. These surveys shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of any permit for the proposed development. VI. a) i) & ii) The proposed annexation area lies in a Zone III groundshaking zone. The lands will be subject to significant ground movement in the event of a major earthquake. When building begins to occur on the properties, structures will be required to meet the City's standards for construction, which include Uniform Building Code requirements for seismic zones. The City Engineer will require the preparation of site -specific geotechnical analysis in conjunction with the submittal of grading plans for each project proposed. This requirement will 714 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EAAdden.WPD 3 v 0 ; ensure that impacts from ground shaking are reduced to a less than significant level. VI. b) The annexation area is subject to moderate wind erosion hazards. The City Engineer will require the preparation of PM 10 Management Plans for each proposed development to control the potential for blowing dust from each project. In addition, the mitigation measures listed under Air Quality, above, will mitigate the potential impacts of soil erosion to a less than significant level. VIII. b1 The annexation of the properties under consideration will have no impact on water resources. As development occurs on these properties, each will be required to implement the City's standards for water conserving plumbing fixtures and on -site retention, which both aid in reducing the potential impacts to groundwater. Each project will also meet the requirements of the City's water -conserving landscaping ordinance. Finally, as new conservation measures are developed, the City will have the ability to impose additional standards to increase water conservation. These standards will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. XI. a) The annexation area occurs in an area with lower levels of traffic, which are not expected to result in exceedances to the City's noise standards at buildout of the General Plan. The ultimate buildout of the annexation area will have less than significant impacts on the noise environment. XI. c) The construction of individual projects within the annexation area will result in temporary high noise levels which could impact residential development within the Coral Mountain Specific Plan, since this area is already under construction. In order to reduce these potential impacts, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1. All internal combustion equipment operating within 500 feet of any occupied residential unit shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers. 2. All stationary construction equipment (e.g. generators and compressors) shall be located as far from occupied dwelling units as possible. 3. Construction activities shall be limited to the hours prescribed in the La Quinta Municipal Code. XIII. a) The annexation will not impact public services. Development of the lands within the area, however, will have an impact on public services. The parcels will be PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EAAdden.WPD 4 715, �33 served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, under City contract. Site development on each parcel will generate property tax which will offset the costs of added police and fire services. Any development project within the annexation area will be required to participate in the City's Impact Fee Program, which helps to offset roadway improvement costs. Each project will also be required to pay school fees in effect at the time of development, to offset the potential impacts to the school system. The ultimate buildout of the annexation area is not expected to have a significant impact on municipal services or facilities. XIV. a) The ultimate buildout of the annexation area will result in an increase in population which will have a need for recreational facilities. The generation of property tax, and the General Plan policies in place to ensure that standards for parkland acquisition are followed by the City as development occurs, will mitigate potential impacts to a less than significant level. P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EAAdden.WPD 5 "d U o � 00 00 � F � � F C o � z W a cq � oW Cd � z U Z CA a 0 �¢ z°H a za � aw w o z A y+ C7 a O a au H a t7 ccn w O z o ti x O d F �z U� o F W N F> p o bA d 0 U ov� W x x N N cd F � N 0 H z a Uo04 A U W ad' F A F A U� OU U -d ti 0 blo o 0 U U 0 � � o N 0 O U �j �.0 U U 0 CA U 0 U cd U �ba a ;To zz ctsACd 0 o b b U U U x U A OQ kn N z 0-4 0 0 ° R,. a 3 o NCd 0 3 •0 A Cd L7 a 0 N 0 Q, u� O H N E O H d A zUz� d� aUWW OU U m Hcd w U . C7 z F o. 0 0 a a ►a O o 0 oz A o 00-4 o w U 00 vWW� 3 0.4 � O ^ Cpy o 0-4 P. -d N e A U� OU U d C;3 F rn 40. 0 b U vn cn y F a 0 0 a w� 0 a, � �O o UA z O W � � F WW � a W a 3 � a o F d A U� �A a�WW OU U F o 0 0 U U U q Q A O w� O F a a W on bn an � z O � U a . � yam, .l v� N 0 z °•= N m d L 713 tf J ORDINANCE NO. — AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA ASSIGNING PRE -ANNEXATION ZONING TO 640 ACRES GENERALLY BOUNDED BY AVENUE 60 ON THE NORTH, AVENUE 62 ON THE SOUTH, MADISON STREET ON THE WEST AND MONROE STREET ON THE EAST CASE NO.: ZONE CHANGE 2002-107 SHEA HOMES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 18th day of June, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for Shea Homes for review of a Zone Change to allow 232 acres currently designated Medium High Density Residential under Specific Plan 218 Al to Medium Density Residential, and 293 acres to Golf Course on land designated Golf Course under Specific Plan 218 Al, and 115 acres currently designated Residential Agriculture and Controlled Development under the Riverside County General Plan to Low Density Residential and Open Space; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings recommending approval of said Zone Change: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan, and the Land Use Map for the General Plan and surrounding development and land use designations, ensuring land use compatibility. 2. The Zone Change will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, as it has been designed to be compatible with surrounding development, and conform with the City's standards and requirements. 3. The Zone Change is compatible with the City's Zoning Ordinance in that it supports the development of single family residential homes, golf course and associated projects within a planned community. 4. The Zone Change supports the orderly development of the City. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California that it does ordain as follows: PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\CC Ord-ZC.WPD Ordinance No. _ Zone Change 2002-107 - Shea Homes Adopted: June 18, 2002 SECTION 1. PURPOSE. To rezone a portion of land generally bounded by Avenue 60 on the north, Avenue 62 on the south, Madison Street on the west and Monroe Street on the east; known as Assessor Parcel Nos. 764-270-001, 002, 004, 005, 015, 017 & 018; 764-280-001 thru 007, 014 and 016, as follows: 232 acres currently designated Medium High Density Residential under Specific Plan 218 Al to Medium Density Residential, and 293 acres to Golf Course, on land designated Open Space and Commercial in the Specific Plan; and 115 acres currently designated Residential Agriculture and Controlled Development under the County General Plan to Low Density Residential and Open Space, and as contained in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL. This Zone Change has complied with the requirements of the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended) and adopted by City Council Resolutions _-_ and _ _, in that the Community Development Director has determined that the proposed Zone Change will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4: POSTING. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three public places designated by Resolution of the City Council, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on this 18th day of June, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 7 <_ P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\CC Ord-ZC.WPD 7 �f � Ordinance No. _ Zone Change 2002-107 - Shea Homes Adopted: June 18, 2002 JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\CC Ord-ZC.WPD A 3 Ordinance No. _ Zone Change 2002-107 - Shea Homes Adopted: June 18, 2002 EXHIBIT "A" P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\CC Ord-ZC.WPD 722 4 .) EXHIBIT A -10 A-1-10 Existing & Proposed Zoning j i Count City-------- - `�--- Original Coral Mtn. SP Area City,B'oundary Annex Boun)O a ATTACHMENT #1 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 C. Section H: Delete "or garage" ROLL CALL: AYES: issioners B r, Kirk, Robbins er, and irman Abels. NO : None. ABSENT: e. ABSTAIN: None. D. Addendum to a Certified Riverside County Environmental Impact Report No. 232 (SCH #9164450613444, Environmental Assessment 2002-447, and Zone Change 2002-107; a request of Dave Twedt/Shea Homes for: 1) Certification of an Addendum to Certified Riverside County Environmental Impact Report No. 232 prepared for Specific Plan 218, Amendment #1 (Coral Mountain-525 acres); 2) Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Approximately 115 acres located within Section 34, Township 6 South, Range 7 East, not included in Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218 Amendment No. 1; and 3) Consideration of a Zone Change for preannexation zoning designations from Riverside County's SP (Specific Plan), A-1-10 (Residential Agriculture), and W-2 (Planned Development) to RL (Low Density Residential), RM (Medium Density Residential), GC (Golf Course), and OS (Open Space) for 640 acres in Riverside County. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Martin Magaria presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked why the City was not requesting agricultural zoning for the date farmer. Staff explained he is grandfathered in and would be allowed to continue farming for as long as wants to. 3. Commissioner Butler clarified it was a preannexation request. Staff stated yes. 4. Commissioner Kirk asked for clarification on why the Planning Commission was certifying two environmental analysis. Staff stated the Addendum was completed because an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was completed for the original project. Staff did an Addendum for the area not included in the first project. Commissioner Kirk asked if an agency could approve an Addendum to an EIR that was completed by a different lead G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 6 40 43 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 agency. Assistant City Attorney John Ramirez stated it has been done before on advice of the City Attorney. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated this was done for the Coral Mountain project that has been annexed and for the area that is currently before LAFCO for annexation. 5. Commissioner Robbins asked if the entire section being considered was a part of the Zone Change and environmental before the Commission. Staff stated yes. Commissioner Robbins stated he would have to excuse himself due to a possible conflict of interest and withdrew from the dias. 6. There being no questions of staff, Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Rich Nowland, representing Shea Homes, gave a presentation on the project. 7. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Tyler questioned the property to the west as it did not look buildable due to the levy. Mr. Nowland stated there are two property owners in this area and they have plans for the property. 8. Chairman Abels asked if anyone else would like to address the Commission on this project. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion. 9. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-054 recommending certification of an Addendum to Riverside County Environmental Impact Report No. 232 prepared for Specific Plan 218 Amendment No. 1, pursuant to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 7 ' 4 1 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 10. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-055 recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-447, pursuant to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. 11. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Butler/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-056, recommending approval of Zone Change 2002-107 subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Commissioner Robbins rejoined the Commission. D. nvironmental Assess nt 2002-450 nd ecific Plan 20 2- 8; a request of Marvin vestments for cert' ' ation of a Mitigat Negative Declaration o environmental im ct and review o development principals guidelines for a 1 ,517 square foot c mercial complex in nine ildings on six acre ocated on the sout ide of Calle Tampico, be een Avenida Berm as and Desert Clu rive and the southeast orner of Calle Tam o and Desert Club ive. 1. Chair Abels opened the p lic hearing and asked for a staff rep t. Principal Planner tan Sawa presented th information ntained in the staff eport, a copy of whic son file in the Community Develo ent Department. 2. Chairman A s asked if there w any questions of staff Co er Tyler asked if Calle ampico had a height restr' on of 22 f t. Community Develo ent Director Jerry Her stated it d shave that designati ;however, the Plannin ommission d City Council adop d a General Plan poli that states this height limitation ' n applicable to Calle T pico. Commissioner Tyler asked s ff o review the locati s for the shared parking areas. 726 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 8 A5 ATTACHMENT #2 PH #C STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 28, 2002 CASE NO: 1) ADDENDUM TO A CERTIFIED RIVERSIDE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 232 (SCH# 9164450613); 2) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-447; AND 3) ZONE CHANGE 2002-107. APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNER: DAVE TWEDT/SHEA HOMES REQUEST: 1) RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR CERTIFICATION OF AN ADDENDUM TO CERTIFIED RIVERSIDE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 232 (SCH# 9164450613) PREPARED FOR 525 ACRES OF SPECIFIC PLAN 218, AMENDMENT NO. 1 (CORAL MOUNTAIN); 2) RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR CERTIFICATION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR APPROXIMATELY 115 ACRES LOCATED WITHIN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, NOT INCLUDED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 218, AMENDMENT NO. 1 (CORAL MOUNTAIN); 3) RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FOR PRE -ANNEXATION ZONING DESIGNATIONS FROM RIVERSIDE COUNTY'S SP (SPECIFIC PLAN), A-1-10 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE), AND W-2 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) TO RL (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), RM (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), GC (GOLF COURSE), AND OS (OPEN SPACE) FOR 640 ACRES IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY. LOCATION: SECTION 34 OF TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, BOUNDED BY MADISON STREET TO THE WEST, MONROE STREET TO THE EAST, AVENUE 60 TO THE NORTH AND AVENUE 62 TO THE SOUTH. ENGINEER: N/A KstfrptSheampd-MM 721 Page 1 of 6 i% 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION: 1) 2) THE LA QUINTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HAS COMPLETED AN ADDENDUM TO THE PRIOR CERTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 232 (SCH# 9164450613) FOR A PORTION OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 218, AMENDMENT NO. 1, AND BASED ON THAT ADDENDUM, DETERMINED THAT ALTHOUGH THE PROPOSED PROJECT COULD HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT, BECAUSE ALL POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS (A) HAVE BEEN ANALYZED ADEQUATELY IN AN EARLIER EIR PURSUANT TO APPLICABLE STANDARDS, AND (B) HAVE BEEN AVOIDED OR MITIGATED PURSUANT TO THAT EARLIER EIR, INCLUDING REVISIONS OR MITIGATION MEASURES THAT ARE IMPOSED UPON THE PROPOSED PROJECT, NOTHING FURTHER IS REQUIRED. THE LA QUINTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HAS ALSO COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-447 FOR THOSE PROPERTIES THAT ARE NOT A PART OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 218, AMENDMENT NO. 1 AREA. BASED UPON THIS ASSESSMENT, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE PROJECT WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT, THEREFORE, A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE RECOMMENDED. THE LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION WILL CONSIDER THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGES AT THE HEARING. GENERAL PLAN/ ZONING DESIGNATIONS: CURRENT GENERAL PLAN (CITY): 1 . LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR): 2-4 UNITS/ACRE; 2. MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MHDR): 8-12 UNITS/ACRE; 3. GOLF COURSE (G); 4. OPEN SPACE (OS). CURRENT ZONING (COUNTY): 1. SPECIFIC PLAN (SP); 2. RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE (A-1-10); 3. CONTROLLED DEVELOPMENT (W-2). PCstfrptShea.wpd-MM Page 2 of 6728 v47, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR ADDENDUM/EA 2002-447/ZC 2002-107 SHEA HOMES -TRILOGY MAY 28, 2002 PROPOSED ZONING (CITY): 1. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) ; 2. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MDR); 3. GOLF COURSE (GC); 4. OPEN SPACE (OS). BACKGROUND: The applicant, Shea Homes, is requesting annexation into the City of La Quinta. The proposed 640 acre annexation area is located outside the existing City's limit and Sphere of Influence and is bounded by Madison Street to the west, Monroe Street to the east, Avenue 60 to the north and Avenue 62 to the south (Attachment 1). Surrounding land uses include a date farm and vacant land to the north, vacant land, two single family homes, a date farm and a carrot field to the east, vineyards to the south A majority of the proposed annexation area has an existing approved Specific Plan (SP218, Amendment No.1) and certified Environmental Impact Report under Riverside County. The Specific Plan was the original Coral Mountain Specific Plan development project on 1,280 acres. The current application covers approximately 525 acres of the original 1,280 acres. Shea Homes purchased this portion of the original Specific Plan project which was approved for residential and golf course development. This portion of the Specific Plan is now being referred to as "Trilogy" and is currently being graded under permits from Riverside County. For purposes of this staff report, "Trilogy" refers to that portion of Coral Mountain Specific Plan 218, Amendment No.1. The remaining 115 acres of the proposed annexation area consists of vacant land, a few single-family homes, a small date farm, and a dike. While this area is proposed as part of the annexation application, it has no development plans currently under consideration. These lands are proposed to remain in an "as is" condition and are not part of the Trilogy project. PCstfrptShea.wpd-MM Page 3 of 6 729 A 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR ADDENDUM/EA 2002-447/ZC 2002-107 SHEA HOMES -TRILOGY MAY 28, 2002 PROJECT PROPOSAL: Prior to annexation; the City requires that General Plan and Pre -Zoning designations be established to City standards. The proposed annexation area currently has General Plan Land Use designations based on the recently adopted General Plan Update, therefore, no General Plan Amendment is required. However, staff is requesting that the Planning Commission and City Council reconfirm these General Plan Land Use designations for the record. These General Plan Land Uses include Low Density Residential, Medium High Density Residential, Golf Course, and Open Space (Attachment 2). Riverside County Zoning designations for the same area are Specific Plan (SP), Residential Agriculture (RA) and Controlled Development (W-2). These are proposed to be changed to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Golf Course, and Open Space. for consistency with the proposed General Plan designations (Attachment 3). STATEMENT OF MANDATORY FINDINGS: The findings for the request outlined in Sections 9.220.010 and 9.230.020 of the Zoning Code can be made and are contained in the attached Resolutions. Consistency with the General Plan. The existing land use designations are not changing, therefore, they are consistent with the City's goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan. With a total of 1,203 units on approximately 232 acres, the density (5.18 units/acre) falls within the range of the City's requirements of 4-8 units/acre under the Medium Density Residential zoning designation. Public Welfare: Approval of the proposed Zone Change will not create conditions materially detrimental to public health, safety and general welfare in that the proposed changes are consistent with existing land uses in the area. Land Use Compatibility: The Zoning designations are compatible with existing land use and zoning designations on adjacent properties in that they are consistent with the City's General Plan. PCstfrptShea.wpd-MM Page 4 of 6 730 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR ADDENDUM/EA 2002-447/ZC 2002-107 SHEA HOMES -TRILOGY MAY 28, 2002 Property Suitability: The proposed Zoning designations are suitable and appropriate for the property and adjacent properties in that they are consistent with the permitted uses in accordance with the Zoning Code and consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the City's General Plan. Change in Circumstances: Approval of the proposed Zone Change is warranted because the situation and general conditions of the property have substantially changed in that the Trilogy project area has been approved under Riverside County and is currently under construction. Urban services are being provided to the area which allow for planned development in accordance with goals, objectives and policies of the City's General Plan. Approval of the proposed Zone Change for the remaining adjacent properties is warranted for consistency with the General Plan due to the status of the approved Trilogy project. Public Notice: This project was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on May 18, 2002, and mailed to all property owners within 500-feet of the site. To date, no comments have been received from adjacent property owners. Any written comments received will be handed out at the meeting. Public Agency Review: A copy of this request has been sent to all applicable public agencies and City Departments. All written comments received are on file with the Community Development Department. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002- , recommending to the City Council certification of an Addendum to Riverside County Environmental Impact Report No.. 232 (SCH# 2000091023) prepared for Specific Plan 218 Amendment No. 1, pursuant to the findings set forth in the attached Resolution; PCstfrptShea.wpd-MM ' f 1 Page 5 of 6 ` � .l. (,1 5 �,3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR ADDENDUM/EA 2002-447/ZC 2002-107 SHEA HOMES -TRILOGY MAY 28, 2002 2. Adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-_, recommending to the City Council certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact (2002-447) pursuant to the findings set forth in the attached Resolution; 3. Adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-_, recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change 2002-107, according to the findings in the attached Resolution. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Existing City General Plan Land Use Map 3. Existing Riverside County Zoning And Proposed City Zoning Map Prepared by: Martin Magaha Associate Planner PCstfrptShea.wpd-MM • 3 Page 6 of 6 51. :y ATTACHMENT #1 City of La Quinta ® Area Outside Shea Homes Project Area Shea Homes Project Original Coral Mtn. SP Area ss. Annex Boundary mass, City Boundary 0 55 110 220 Feel N 58TH AVE ATTACHMENT #2 58TH AVE City of La Quinta ®Area Outside Shea Homes Project Area Shea Homes Project Original Coral Mtn. SP Area ss Annex Boundary noun, City Boundary 0 55 110 220 Feet vi 5.3 zo F- W-2 Existing & proposed Zoning Coun City Original Coral Mtn. SP Area City nclary Annex =Boun ATTACHMENT #3 -10 DR A-1-10 73751 — 6151, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFICATION OF AN ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 232 (SCH#2000091023) PREPARED FOR ZONE CHANGE 2002- 107, PRE -ANNEXATION ZONING FOR SPECIFIC PLAN 218, AMENDMENT NO. 1 CASE: RIVERSIDE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 232 APPLICANT: SHEA HOMES WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 28th day of May, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #232 (SCH#2000091023) for Zone Change 2002-107 for Pre -annexation Zoning designations for Specific Plan 218, Amendment No. 1 located west of Madison Avenue, east of Monroe Avenue, south of Avenue 60 and north of Avenue 62, and more particularly described as follows: APNs: 764-270-001, 002, 004, 017 & 018; and. 764-280-016. WHEREAS, said Addendum has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-68), in that the Community Development Department has determined that although the proposed Zone Change 2002-107 could have a significant adverse effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the project, nothing further is required. WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following findings to justify recommending certification of said Addendum: 1. The proposed Zone Change 2002-107 will not be detrimental to public health, safety or general welfare of the community, either directly to indirectly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by the Addendum. 2. The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 736 PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\PC Reso Addendum.wpd PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2002- RIVERSIDE COUNTY EIR ADDENDUM SHEA HOMES -TRILOGY ADOPTED: MAY 28, 2002 3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends in that mitigation measures are imposed on the project that will reduce impacts to less than significant levels. 4. The proposed project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Addendum. 5. The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. 6. The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment in that mitigation measures are imposed on the project that will reduce impacts to a less than significant level. 8. The Planning Commission has considered the Addendum to Riverside County Environmental Impact Report No. 232 (SCH#2000091023) and the Addendum reflects the independent judgement of the City. 9. The City has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effects set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 10. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission for this Addendum. 2. That it does hereby recommend to the City Council certification of the Addendum to Riverside County Environmental Impact Report No. 232 (SCH#2000091023) for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated ! 3 7 ►50 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\PC Reso Addendum.wpd PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2002- RIVERSIDE COUNTY EIR ADDENDUM SHEA HOMES -TRILOGY ADOPTED: MAY 28, 2002 in the Addendum on file in the Community Development Department and attached hereto. 3. That the Addendum to Riverside County Environmental Impact Report No. 232 reflects the independent judgement of the City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission, held on this 28" day of May, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JACQUES ABELS, Chairman City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JERRY HERMAN, Community Development Director City of La Quinta, California 733 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\PC Reso Addendum.wpd 57 ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (CEQA GUIDELINE 15164) FOR ZONE CHANGE 2002-107 FOR PRE -ANNEXATION APPLICATION FOR A PORTION OF THE CORAL MOUNTAIN SPECIFIC PLAN, NO. 218, AMENDMENT NO. 1 739 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EIRAdden.WPO 1 ! 5 8 The City of La Quinta, as lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code section 21000, et seq. ("CEQA") has prepared this Addendum pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15164. This is an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report #232 ("EIR") that the County of Riverside certified in 1999 for the Coral Mountain Specific Plan, SP 218, Amendment #1. The purpose of this Addendum is to document the annexation of the project to the City of La Quinta, which will be implemented through the following land use approvals: ZONE CHANGE 2002-107 This is referred to as "the Revised Project." All mitigation measures included in EIR 232 and AEIR 232 are incorporated into this document by this reference. It is assumed.. for purposes of this analysis, that all the mitigation measures required within Riverside County's jurisdiction would also be required by the City. The Revised Project consists of 525 acres of the total 1,280 acres included in the Coral Mountain Specific Plan SP/EIR 218, Amendment #1. The Revised Project will result in the annexation of the southern portion of the Specific Plan area into the City of La Quinta. The City's General Plan identifies 232 acres of Medium High Density Residential and 293 acres designated Golf Course. The City has determined that the proposed residential development will be consistent with the density and character of the adjacent residential development, and will be consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City's General Plan and Specific Plan 218, Amendment #1, as approved by the County in 1999. The Revised Project does not propose any change to the land uses proposed in Specific Plan 218, Amendment #1. Only annexation of the site, and associated pre - annexation land use and zoning designations, are being considered at this time. The Specific Plan allows 18 holes of golf, a practice range, a golf clubhouse, a homeowners' clubhouse, a tennis center on approximately 293 acres, and 1,203 residential units on approximately 232 acres. Since General Plan designations have been assigned to the property under consideration, the only approval requested is: 1. Zone Change to change the designation on 232 acres currently designated Medium High Density Residential under the Specific Plan to Medium Density Residential, and 293 acres to Golf Course on land designated Open Space and Commercial in the Specific Plan; The City has compared the impacts of the Revised Project with those impacts analyzed in the EIR and finds as follows: 740 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EIRAdden.WPD 2 Aesthetics - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. Annexation of the proposed land will not result in any change in the buildout of the property. The residential units, golf course and clubhouses are consistent with those currently permitted and constructed in other areas of the City under the City's General Plan. The proposed building style and architecture within the annexation area is of substantially the same character as those existing in the City and encouraged in the General Plan. Hazards and Hazardous Materials - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The annexation action will have no impact on hazardous materials; the residents of the proposed project will participate in the City's household hazardous waste disposal programs. Public Services - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The annexation of the property will be served by the Riverside County Sheriff and Fire Department, under the City's service contracts. The contract costs may increase for the City, but will be offset by revenues generated by property tax throughout the site, and sales tax at the golf and tennis clubhouses, and generated by the increased population within the City. School fees will be paid regardless of which jurisdiction is responsible for construction of the project. Parks will be constructed within the Specific Plan, and golf course lands will surround the homes. 741 6D PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EIRAdden.WPD Agriculture Resources - Hydrology and Water Recreation - Impacts no Impacts no greater than Quality - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The greater than previously previously analyzed. development of the analyzed. The City Annexation of the project approved Specific Plan requires the will not affect the golf will result in a loss of implementation of both course planned for the lands designated as Prime NPDES standards and 100 proposed project area. Farmland in the County year storm retention in Additional park lands are General Plan. The proposed project proposed in other parts annexation of the construction. All of the Specific Plan. property will not change construction on the These facilities will be the previously analyzed proposed annexation area provided regardless of impacts to agriculture. will be required to the jurisdiction in which conform to these they occur, and will standards. offset the need for such facilities created by future development. Air Quality - Impacts Land Use Planning - Transportation/Traffic - identical to those Impacts no greater than Impacts no greater than previously analyzed. No those previously analyzed. those previously changes to the project are The annexation represents analyzed. The proposed as part of the a logical extension of development potential of annexation. The Air urbanization for the City. the annexation lands are Quality analysis in the EIR The project is consistent the same as were reviewed the same levels with the goals, policies analyzed in the EIR, and types of development and objectives of the Land insofar as the land use as are currently planned. Use Element of the City designations are General Plan and the consistent. The proposed Specific Plan, as project results in a slight amended, and continues reduction in the total the development pattern number of residential envisioned in the General units to be constructed Plan. on the site, so that it is likely that the impacts will be slightly less than analyzed in the EIR. n i! 61 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EIRAdden.WPD 4 Biological Resources - Mineral Resources - NotTg�reaterthan and Service Impacts no greater than applicable. s - Impacts no those previously analyzed. those previously analyzed. The annexation action will Annexation will have no have no direct impact on impact on utilities and biological resources. The service systems. The mitigation measures buildout of the proposed included in the EIR, project was analyzed in including potential for the EIR, and mitigation additional surveys, will be measures included, implemented by the City. which the City will implement. Cultural Resources - Noise - Impacts no Population and Housing - Impacts no greater than greater than those Impacts less than those those previously analyzed. previously analyzed. The previously analyzed. The Although the annexation annexation action, in and annexation action, in and action, in and of itself, of itself, will not impact of itself, will have no will have no impact on the noise environment at impact on population and cultural resources, the the project site. The housing. The number of potential impacts buildout of the project, as units proposed under the associated with buildout analyzed in the EIR, Specific Plan has been of the proposed project included mitigation reduced with the were analyzed in the EIR, measures which will be proposed project, and and mitigation measures implemented by the City. impacts are expected to included. These will be also be slightly reduced. implemented by the City. Geology and Soils - Impacts no greater than those previously analyzed. The impacts of development of the proposed project were analyzed in the EIR, and will not change as a result of annexation. Mitigation measures included in the EIR will be implemented by the City. 743 sz P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EIRAdden.WPD The City finds that consideration of the Revised Project does not call for the preparation of a subsequent EIR pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15162 or Public Resources Code Section 21166, in that the Revised Project does not involve: 1. substantial changes to the project analyzed in the EIR which would involve new significant effects on the environment or substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts; 2. substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which would involve new significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the EIR; or 3. new information of substantial importance which would involve new significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the EIR substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts. 744 PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EIRAdden.WPD 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-447 PREPARED FOR ZONE CHANGE 2002-107. CASE NO.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-447 APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 281h day of May, 2002 hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2002-447 for Zone Change 2002-107 for Pre -annexation Zoning designations of lands located west of Madison Avenue, east of Monroe Avenue, south of Avenue 60 and north of Avenue 62, and more particularly described as follows: APNs: 764-270-005, 015; 764-280-001 thru 007, and 014. WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study (EA 2002-447) and has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because appropriate mitigation measures were made a part of the assessment and included in the conditions of approval and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following findings to justify recommending certification of said Environmental Assessment: 1. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2002-447. 2. The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 745 64 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2002- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-447 SHEA HOMES -TRILOGY ADOPTED: MAY 28, 2002 3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends in that mitigation measures are imposed on the project that will reduce impacts to less than significant levels. 4. The proposed project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. 5. The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. 6. The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment in that mitigation measures are imposed on the project that will reduce impacts to a less than significant level. 8. The Planning Commission has considered Environmental Assessment 2002-447 and said Assessment reflects the independent judgement of the City. 9. The City has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 10. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby certify the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2002-447 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated 74 s in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum on file in the P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\PC Reso EA 02-447.wpd V 6 J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2002- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-447 - SHEA HOMES -TRILOGY ADOPTED: MAY 28, 2002 Community Development Department and attached hereto. 3. That Environmental Assessment 2002-447 reflects the independent judgement of the City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission held on this 28" day of May, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JACQUES ABELS, Chairman City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JERRY HERMAN Community Development Director City of La Quinta, California 747 0 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\PC Reso EA 02-447.wpd Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Zone Change 2002-107, Pre -Annexation Zoning 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Martin Magana, 760-777-7125 4. Project Location: Non-contiguous lots in Section 34, T.6S., R.7E., located between Madison Street And Monroe Street, and Between Avenue 60 and Avenue 62 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of La Quinta 478-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 6. General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential (approximately 84 acres) and Open Space (approximately 31 acres). 7. Zoning: Current: W-2 (Controlled Development) and Residential Agriculture. Proposed: Low Density Residential and Open Space. 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Pre -Annexation Zoning designations are requested for lands currently in unincorporated Riverside County. A parallel application has been made for a portion of lands in the Coral Mountain Specific Plan, located in Section 34, T.6S., R.7E. This request for pre -annexation zoning encompassed the balance of the lands in this section which are not located in the Specific Plan. Approximately 31 acres are currently zoned Agriculture in the County (located at the centerline of the section, on its eastern boundary), and 86 acres are zoned W-2, controlled development (located north and south of the centerline of the section, along its western boundary). Approximately 31 acres within the W-2 zoned lands include the Bureau of Reclamation flood control levee. The total annexation area is 115 acres. P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD 748 o 6 '7 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings. North: Vacant desert lands, agriculture, Coral Mountain Specific Plan South: Agriculture, Open Space West: Open Space, flood control levee East: Coral Mountain Specific Plan, agriculture 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Not applicable 749 68 PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD 2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology and Soils Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Z El J4 gnure Date 750 � P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD 3 % Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analysis are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. The analysis of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance 751 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD 4 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: AESTHETICS: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (General Plan EIR p. III-159 ff.) b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (General Plan EIR p. III-159 ff.) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which (Application adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. materials) II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES:. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Dept. Of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (General Plan EIR p. III-21 ff.) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to nonagricultural use? (Aerial photographs) III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Project Description) X X X X X X X 7 PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD 5 e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X (Project Description) IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) c) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) Either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (La Quinta Municipal Code; General Plan) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 122 ff.) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resources (i.e., an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 122 ff.) c) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? (Master Environmental Assessment, Exhibit 5.9) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 122 ff.) X X X X X X X X X X 753 PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD o72 VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (General Plan EIR p. III-61 ff.) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (General Plan EIR p. III-61 ff.) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (General Plan EIR p. III-61 ff.) iv) Landslides? (General Plan MEA p. 96 ff) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (General Plan MEA p. 96 ff) c) Be located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on - or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (General Plan MEA p. 96 ff) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (General Plan MEA p. 96 ff) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (General Plan MEA p. 96 ff) V1I. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: X X X X X X X X a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Application Materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Application Materials) c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Application Materials) d) Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Riverside County Hazardous Materials Listing) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD X X X X X �A 04 f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip; would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (General Plan MEA p. 94 ff) h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildlands fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off - site? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems to control? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) f) Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Master Environmental Assessment Exhibit 6.5) g) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment Exhibit 6.5) IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Project Description) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purposes of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan p. 18 ff.) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) X X X 5 ,j74 PAMartin\Shea Homes-Tri10gy\EACk1st.WPD X. XI. XII. XIII. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) NOISE: Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (General Plan MEA p. 110 ff.) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (General Plan MEA p. 110 ff.) c) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan MEA p. 110 ff.) d) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Master Environmental Assessment, p. 110 ff.) e) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive levels? (General Plan land use map) POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (General Plan, p. 9 ff.) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) PUBLIC SERVICES X X X X X X X a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.), X X X 756 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACklsf WPD 9 ,j 7 J XIV. XV. XVI. Police protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) Schools? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) RECREATION: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application Materials) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application Materials) TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) . b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Application Materials) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Application Materials) g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Application Materials) UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) F.9 X X X X X X X X O PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD 4, d) Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSIS. M X X X X X X Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. Environmental Impact Report 232, Coral Mountain Specific Plan. No earlier analysis were used in this review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. See attached Addendum. 758 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD 11 077 SOURCES: Master Environmental Assessment, City of La Quinta General Plan 2002. SCAQMD CEQA Handbook. General Plan, City of La Quinta, 2002. General Plan Environmental Impact Report, 2002. City of La Quinta Municipal Code 759 L!73 PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EACkIst.WPD 12 Addendum for Environmental Assessment 2002-447 II. a) Approximately 31 acres of the annexation area is currently designated Agriculture under County Zoning. This area of the County is designated as Prime Farmland in the County General Plan. The annexation itself will have no impact on this designation. Should the 31 acres eventually be developed under the Low Density Residential Designation, the land would be lost to agriculture. The 31 acres is currently divided into a 19.4 and a 9.33 acre parcel, and is surrounded on three sides (north, south and west) by the Coral Mountain Specific Plan, which is under construction at this time. The parcels are therefore isolated, and do not represent a long term valuable resource for agriculture in the area. The impacts to agricultural resources are therefore not expected to be significant. III. a) The annexation itself will not result in any impact to air quality. The buildout of the lands, however, would result in up to 336 single family residential units on 84 acres. These single family units will generate approximately 3,216 trips per day on the regional roadway system', which will generate emissions which have an impact on the air quality in the area. Based on this trip generation, the project at buildout will generate the following pollutants. Running Exhaust Emissions (pounds/day) PM10 PM10 PM10 CO ROC NOx Exhaust Brakes Tires 50 mph 116.29 4.47 23.85 -- 0.50 0.50 Daily Threshold 550 75 100 150 Based on 3,216 trips/day and average trip length of 7 miles, using EMFAC7G Model provided by California Air Resources Board. Assumes catalytic light autos at 75°F. * Operational thresholds provided by SCAQMD for assistance in determining the significance of a project and the need for an EIR. "Trip Generation, Sixth Edition," Institute of Transportation Engineers, for category 210, Single -Family Detached Housing. 7r; 0 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EAAdden.WPD 1 }73 The buildout of the annexation area will not exceed any threshold for the generation of moving emissions, as established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District in determining the need for an EIR. The impacts to air quality relating to chemical pollution are not expected to be significant. III. c) The Coachella Valley is a non -attainment area for PM10 (particulate matter of 10 microns or smaller). The annexation of the area will not have an impact on PM10 generation, in and of itself. The buildout of the area, however, which will result in the construction of 336 residential units, has the potential to generate dust, which could contribute to the PM 10 problem. In order to control PM 10, the City has imposed standards and requirements on development to control dust. The applicant will be required to submit a PM10 Management Plan prior to initiation of any earth moving activity at the site. In addition, the potential impacts associated with PM10 can be mitigated by the mitigation measures below. 1. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. 2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation during construction on any portion of the annexation area. 3. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. Cut and fill quantities will be balanced on each parcel as construction occurs. 5. Any portion of a parcel to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. 6. Watering of any parcel or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on -going basis after the initiation of any grading activity. Portions of any parcel that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. 7. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. As projects are proposed within the annexation area, the Community Development Department shall impose conditions of approval which require landscaping of parkways, open areas and front yards as part of the first phase of any project. 761, P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EAAdden.WPD 2 1 n 8. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean up of construction -related dirt on approach routes. 9. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, the impacts to air quality from buildout of the annexation area will not be significant. IV. a) The annexation of the properties being considered for annexation will not have an impact on biological resources. The buildout of the area, however, could have a potentially significant impact on several sensitive species. The City's General Plan identifies the annexation lands on the western boundary of the Section as potential habitat for desert tortoise, Palm Springs pocket mouse, and Palm Springs ground squirrel. In order to ensure that the impacts to these species are less than significant, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1. Any parcel within the annexation area which proposes development shall be required to perform focused biological species for all species shown as potentially occurring in the area, according to the General Plan biological resource exhibits in place at the time development is proposed (currently exhibits 5.2 through 5.8, inclusive). V. b) The annexation area and the City occur in an area of considerable archaeological significance. The buildout of the annexation area could therefore result in significant impacts without mitigation. In order to ensure that the impacts to cultural resources are mitigated to a less than significant level, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1. Any parcel within the annexation area which proposes development shall be required to submit Phase I cultural resource surveys performed according to City standards in force at the time development occurs. These surveys shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of any permit for the proposed development. VI. a) i) & ii) The proposed annexation area lies in a Zone III groundshaking zone. The lands will be subject to significant ground movement in the event of a major earthquake. When building begins to occur on the properties, structures will be required to meet the City's standards for construction, which include Uniform Building Code requirements for seismic zones. The City Engineer will require the preparation of site -specific geotechnical analysis in conjunction with the submittal of grading plans for each project proposed. This requirement will 70.3n PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EAAdden.WPD 3 j 8 ensure that impacts from ground shaking are reduced to a less than significant level. VI. b) The annexation area is subject to moderate wind erosion hazards. The City Engineer will require the preparation of PM10 Management Plans for each proposed development to control the potential for blowing dust from each project. In addition, the mitigation measures listed under Air Quality, above, will mitigate the potential impacts of soil erosion to a less than significant level. VIII. b) The annexation of the properties under consideration will have no impact on water resources. As development occurs on these properties, each will be required to implement the City's standards for water conserving plumbing fixtures and on -site retention, which both aid in reducing the potential impacts to groundwater. Each project will also meet the requirements of the City's water -conserving landscaping ordinance. Finally, as new conservation measures are developed, the City will have the ability to impose additional standards to increase water conservation. These standards will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. XI. a) The annexation area occurs in an area with lower levels of traffic, which are not expected to result in exceedances to the City's noise standards at buildout of the General Plan. The ultimate buildout of the annexation area will have less than significant impacts on the noise environment. XI. c) The construction of individual projects within the annexation area will result in temporary high noise levels which could impact residential development within the Coral Mountain Specific Plan, since this area is already under construction. In order to reduce these potential impacts, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1. All internal combustion equipment operating within 500 feet of any occupied residential unit shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers. 2. All stationary construction equipment (e.g. generators and compressors) shall be located as far from occupied dwelling units as possible. 3. Construction activities shall be limited to the hours prescribed in the La Quinta Municipal Code. XIII. a) The annexation will not impact public services. Development of the lands within the area, however, will have an impact on public services. The parcels will be 763 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EAAdden.WPD 4 J O 3 served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, under City contract. Site development on each parcel will generate property tax which will offset the costs of added police and fire services. Any development project within the annexation area will be required to participate in the City's Impact Fee Program, which helps to offset roadway improvement costs. Each project will also be required to pay school fees in effect at the time of development, to offset the potential impacts to the school system. The ultimate buildout of the annexation area is not expected to have a significant impact on municipal services or facilities. XIV. a) The ultimate buildout of the annexation area will result in an increase in population which will have a need for recreational facilities. The generation of property tax, and the General Plan policies in place to ensure that standards for parkland acquisition are followed by the City as development occurs, will mitigate potential impacts to a less than significant level. 761 P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\EAAdden.WPD 5 A 3 'c7 0 � o co �'• � �', b CD co a o r0 r 9 PA ' o00 CD Z ara o > '��y N �. CD co M CA O b A' �, O > Z N CD � y N � � t,n t� n bod Ed d o �V i� :I a• CrJ Cri � � tov7� Qoq JQ N OG U5. �. p C7 C7 d coo �+ . b M M O O O CD ~ z ►d ►d •d 'ts ►d �d 'C b •d CD o. o• °•a.M• CD QQ o v 0 v o b n n .b 5, y' n N o `� O o N CD N „�� (A N /r CD Q �. o o CD cr o C4 n n pp7� N ►-y � ►'3 CD CD et EL P) n o.QQ y CD N OA x a N �7 �1 n0 � i CrJ d d �•C C�1 � Y Y t� � y r O � d o H b •• O z r z 5v CD tTj n a co w co OQ co a N A 0 O M V) n 0' w z N 765 o84 N a ►d C0 CD co cu C En CD CD I CD Z � ° n ° n 5 w, O CnrA r � '� � CD y c� Ul o coo n 7d GI0.4 0 co � to c � � � �> `C G R.3 O M N bd bd C7d Cl o O IRS! a a Uaq UQ t7 u t) 4b ro ob 2A Obd (IQ QQ OQ O ° "CD co Hq CD b CD CD ~ A n a n O O O CD ►►�� `d nn nn n0 O nb nb nr d tv10 d Y �,+8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FOR PRE -ANNEXATION ZONING DESIGNATIONS FROM RIVERSIDE COUNTY'S SP (SPECIFIC PLAN), A-1-10 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE), AND W-2 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) TO RL (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), RM (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), GC (GOLF COURSE), AND OS (OPEN SPACE) FOR 640 ACRES IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY LOCATED WEST OF MADISON AVENUE, EAST OF MONROE AVENUE, SOUTH OF AVENUE 60 AND NORTH OF AVENUE 62. CASE: ZONE CHANGE 2002-107 APPLICANT: SHEA HOMES/CITY OF LA QUINTA WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 281h day of May, 2002, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider Pre - annexation Zoning from Riverside County's SP (Specific Plan), A-1-10 (Residential Agriculture), and W-2 (Planned Development) to RL (Low Density Residential), Rm (Medium Density Residential),. GC (Golf Course), and OS (Open Space) for 640 Acres in Riverside County located west of Madison Avenue, east of Monroe Avenue, south of Avenue 60 and north of Avenue 62, as shown on Exhibit "A," more particularly described as: APNs: 764-270-001, 002, 004, 005, 015, 017 & 018; 764-280-001 thru 007, 014 and 016. WHEREAS, said Zone Change application has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-68), in that the Community Development Department has completed an Addendum to the prior certified Environmental Impact Report No. 232 (SCH##2000091023) for a portion of Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment No. 1, and based on that Addendum, determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. WHEREAS, the La Quinta Community Development Department has also completed Environmental Assessment 2002-447 for those properties that are not a part of the Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218, Amendment No. 1 area, and based upon this assessment, it was found that the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment, therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be recommended. 767 U 0 PAMartin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\PC Reso ZC 02-107.wpd PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2002- ZONE CHANGE 2002-107 SHEA HOMES -TRILOGY ADOPTED: May 28, 2002 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.220.010 of the Zoning Code to justify a recommendation for approval of said Zone Change: 1. Consistency with the General Plan. The existing land use designations are not changing, therefore, they are consistent with the City's goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan. With a total of 1,203 units on approximately 232 acres, the density (5.18 units/acre) falls within the range of the City's requirements of 4-8 units/acre under the Medium Density Residential zoning designation. 2. Public Welfare: Approval of the proposed Zone Change will not create conditions materially detrimental to public health, safety and general welfare in that the proposed changes are consistent with existing land uses in the area. 3. Land Use Compatibility: The Zoning designations are compatible with existing land use and zoning designations on adjacent properties in that they are consistent with the City's General Plan. 4. Property Suitability: The proposed Zoning designations are suitable and appropriate for the property and adjacent properties in that they are consistent with the permitted uses in accordance with the Zoning Code and consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the City's General Plan. 5. Change in Circumstances: Approval of the proposed Zone Change is warranted because the situation and general conditions of the property have substantially changed in that the Trilogy project area has been approved under Riverside County and is currently under construction. Urban services are being provided to the area which allow for planned development in accordance with goals, objectives and policies of the City's General Plan. Approval of the proposed Zone Change for the remaining adjacent properties is warranted for consistency with the General Plan due to the status of the approved Trilogy project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission in this case; and 2. That it does hereby confirm the conclusion that the Addendum to the Riverside County Environmental Impact Report No. 232 and Environmental Assessment 2002-447 assessed the environmental concerns of the Zone Change; and, 768 ONE -OVA P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\PC Reso ZC 02-107.wpd PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2002- ZONE CHANGE 2002-107 • SHEA HOMES -TRILOGY ADOPTED: May 28, 2002 3. That it does hereby recommend approval to the City Council of Zone Change 2002-107 as contained in Exhibit"A" attached hereto and made a part of, for the reasons set forth in this resolution effective upon annexation. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission, held on this 281h day of May, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ,ABSTAIN: JACQUES ABELS, Chairman City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JERRY HERMAN, Community Development Director City of La Quinta, California 7qr) P:\Martin\Shea Homes-Trilogy\PC Reso ZC 02-107.wpd EXHIBIT A MINIM IN 11 -MEN I r--� Hsi h�' i_ MS MRS I WS SS 06 io,1,1111111�1111lk VS I I Q�V-IW 01 4-W-4 �-Vw-,M.4 IVA4% QV Q , VP4, Q Q _j, Q PqP ,�4 ,WO"W P w W� -1 �! 'A E4 mtv WE WE #1 WE WE 1+1 DIS A-1-10 Existing & proposed Zoning W-2 I ! �` I � coup 1 I It city original Coral hAn. SP Area 7 city ndary I i i I ._ - Annex =BOU ATTAC-,HMENT,#3 ... . . ..... .. . . . .......... . 58TH AVE F--1 City of La Quinta Area Outside Shea Homes Project Area Shea Homes Project [=Original Coral Mtn. SP Area nR!w Annex Boundary Unum, City Boundary 0 55 lio 220 Feet 7�1 AD ATTACHMENT #4 19 ATTACHMENT #5 J., W-2 Existing & Proposed Zoning County City original Coral Mtn. SP Area City boundary iimii� Annex Bounl MOB A-1-10 0 T4ht 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 18, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: Public Hearing to Consider an Amendment to the La PUBLIC HEARING: 5 Quinta Municipal Code to Add Section 9.50.055, Second Floor Addition Within an Existing Unit, to the Very Low Density (RVL) and Low Density (RL) Residential Zoning Districts RECOMMENDATION: 1 . Move to take up Ordinance No. by title and number only and waive further reading. Move to introduce Ordinance No. adding a new Section 9.50.055, Second Floor Addition Within an Existing Unit, to the RVL and RL Residential Zoning Districts. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Staff has in the past, reviewed requests for second floor conversions and generally prohibited these conversions based on current regulations. A recent request was to convert space within the building envelope into a habitable room thus creating a second floor. Staff took the issue to the Planning Commission for their interpretation on April 23, 2002. The Commission directed staff to prepare the necessary Ordinance change to allow the conversion with very stringent parameters. On May 28, 2002, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this matter and recommends the City Council adopt a Zoning Code Amendment that would permit an existing single family dwelling to add habitable space as part of a second story component as long as the second story is limited on its impact to the surrounding residential units. The Exhibit to the Ordinance provides the standards recommended by the Planning Commission. G:\WPD0CS\ZCA072SecStory.wpd FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The findings necessary to approve this request can be made, and are included in the attached Resolutions. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Move to take up Ordinance No. by title and number only and waive further reading. Move to introduce Ordinance No. adding a new Section 9.50.055, Second Floor Addition Within an Existing Unit in the RVL and RL Residential Zoning Districts; or 2. Do not adopt the above Ordinance; or 3. Remand the request to the Planning Commission for further consideration; or 4. Continue the request and provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully su mitted, Je He Co munity evelopment Director Approved for Submission, Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Planning Commission minutes of April 23, 2002 and May 28, 2002 77r ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 9.50.055-SECOND FLOOR ADDITION WITHIN AN EXISTING UNIT, WITHIN THE VERY LOW DENSITY (RVL) AND LOW DENSITY (RL) RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT CASE NO.: ZCA 2002-072 APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 18th day of June, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for a Zoning Code Amendment to add Section 9.55.055 to the Municipal Code, to allow second floor additions within an existing unit, within the RVL and RL Residential Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 28th day of May, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for a Zoning Code Amendment to add Section 9.55.055 to the Municipal Code, to allow second floor additions within an existing unit, within the RVL and RL Residential Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the text amendment is exempt pursuant to Chapter 2.6, Section 21080 of the Public Resources Code, California Environmental Quality Act statutes, and Section 15268, Ministerial Projects, of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings recommending approval of said Zoning Code Amendment: 1. The proposed text changes are consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan, and the Land Use Map for the General Plan and surrounding development and land use designations, ensuring land use compatibility. 2. The proposed text changes will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, as they have been designed to be compatible with surrounding development, and conform with the City's standards and requirements. 3. The proposed text changes supports the orderly development of the City. 776 G:\WPDOCS\Ordinances\ZCA072SecStory.wpd 3 Ordinance No. _ Zoning Code Amendment 2002-072 Adopted: June 18, 2002 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California that it does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. PURPOSE. To add Section 9.50.055 to the Municipal Code as provided in Exhibit A, attached hereto. SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL. This Zoning Code Amendment has complied with the requirements of the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended) and adopted by City Council Resolution 83-68, in that the amendments are found to be exempt from CEQA pursuant to Chapter 2.6. Section 21080 of the Public Resources Code, and Section 15268, Ministerial Projects, of the CEQA Guidelines. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4: POSTING. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three public places designated by Resolution of the City Council, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on this 18th day of June, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 777 G:\WPDOCS\Ordinances\ZCA072SecStory.wpd Ordinance No. _ Zoning Code Amendment 2002-072 Adopted: June 18, 2002 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 778 G:\WPDOCS\Ordinances\ZCA072SecStory.wpd EXHIBIT "A" Section 9.50.055- Second Floor Addition within an existing unit in RVL and RL Zoning Districts. A property owner may apply through the Minor Use Permit (Section 9.210.020) process for permission to alter a single family dwelling unit to provide an upper story living area within the Very Low and Low Density Residential Zones when the following has been complied with: A. No change to the exterior building elevation with the exception of providing light and ventilation. Windows are only allowed on the street -facing facade. Dormer windows are prohibited. B. No windows (except skylights) or access points are permitted on roof slopes (i.e., hip roof sections). C. Permitted only in areas where two story structures are permitted by Code. The second floor shall not be considered as a two-story home as defined in Section 9.60.300.1.1 (Compatibility Review). D. Comply with all Building Codes including, but not limited to: 1. Foundations; 2. Floor loads; and 3. The interior vertical clearance requirements. E. Maintain a two car garage with a vertical interior clearance of 7-feet 6-inches. F. The second floor living area cannot exceed 10% of the existing house square footage. The addition can only be located within the front half of the existing structure that abuts, or is adjacent to the street right of way where the primary access to the structure is located. G. Access must be from the interior of the existing house. H. No exterior reconstruction of the existing structure is permitted to accommodate the addition with the exception of windows and skylights. 779 G:\WPDOCS\Ordinances\ZCA072SecStory.wpd ATTACHMENT #1 Planning Commission Minutes April 23, 2002 C. Zoning Code Interpretation; a request of staff for an interpretation of '7 Section 9.60.300 of the Zoning Code regarding two story units. 1. Chairman Abels asked for the staff report. Community Development Director Jerry Herman presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. There being no questions of staff, Chairman Abels asked if there was any other public comment. Mr. Kevin McCune 78-760 Sunbrook Lane, showed the Commission the proposed changes to their house which initiated the Commission interpretation. 3. Commissioner Tyler asked if there would be any structural changes. Mr. McCune stated they will have a structural engineer design the change. Commissioner Tyler stated his only concern is windows that would invade a neighbors privacy. 4. There being no further public participation, the public comment portion was closed and open for Commission discussion. Staff explained possible alternatives as to how the Code could be written. 5. Commissioner Butler stated this should be done on a case by case basis. Staff stated it would not be allowed as it would be a variance which is not allowed. It could be done by zones. 6. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Minute Motion 2002-009, directing staff to prepare a Zoning Code Amendment to modify Section 9.50.300 regarding two story units addressing the following concerns: A. Approval is obtained from adjacent property owners; B. Windows shall be allowed on the street frontage only; C. The change must stay within the existing structure with no exterior changes; and D. Prepare a provision that will not allow any adjoining neighbor to build a second story that changes the existing structure. Unanimously approved. 780 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\4-23-02.wpd 12 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 A. Zoning Code Amendment 2002-072; a request of the City for a J recommendation to the City Council to add Section 9.50.055-Second Floor Addition within an Existing Unit, to the La Quinta Municipal Code within the Residential Zones. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Community Development Director Jerry Herman presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to explain "excluding dormers". Staff stated the purpose was to exclude dormer windows and explained why. Commissioner Tyler asked why not allow any roof changes within five years. Staff explained this was to prevent a homeowner from changing their roof structure to allow room for the second story unit. Commissioners asked that Section "C" be deleted. Commissioner Tyler questioned allowing access from the garage as it would require a different set of fire regulations and should not be allowed. 3. Commissioner Butler asked if the roof's were altered would it not have to come back to the Planning Commission for a compatibility review. Staff stated yes, that would be a compatibility issue. 4. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion. 5. Commissioner Kirk supported the request with the deletion of Section "C". 6. Commissioner Butler agreed. 7. Commissioner Tyler asked that the option for a garage access be deleted. 8. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-053 recommending to the City Council approval of Zoning Code Amendment 2002-072, as amended: 78,1 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 5 4' 3 Planning Commission Minutes May 28, 2002 A. Section A: Dormers are prohibited B. Section C: Deleted C. Section H: Delete "or garage" ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. D. Addendum to a Certified Riverside County Environmental Impact Report No 232 (SCH #9164450613444 Environmental Assessment 2002-447, and Zone Change 2002-107; a request of Dave Twedt/Shea Homes for: 1) Certification of an Addendum to Certified Riverside County nvironmental Impact Report No. 232 prepared for Specific Plan 218, A endment #1 (Coral Mountain-525 acres); 2) Certification of a Miti ted Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Appro , ately 115 acres located within Section 34, Township 6 South, Range 7 ast, not included in Riverside County Specific Plan No. 218 Amendmen No. 1; and 3) Consideration of a Zone Change for preannexation oning designations from Riverside County's SP (Specific Plan), A-1-10 (R idential Agriculture), and W-2 (Planned Development) to RL (Low Densit esidential), RM (Medium Density Residential), GC (Golf Course), and 0 Open Space) for 640 acres in Riverside County. 1. Chairman Abels ope d the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Associate an Martin Magaha presented the information contained in a staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Develop ent Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if the were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked why the City was not requesting agricultural zoning for the date fa er. Staff explained he is grandfathered in and would beNo to continue farming for as long as wants to. 3. Commissioner Butler clarified it was a pr annexation request. Staff stated yes. 4. Commissioner Kirk asked for clarification on w the Planning Commission was certifying two environmental a lysis. Staff stated the Addendum was completed because an En ironmental Impact Report (EIR) was completed for the original proje t. Staff did an Addendum for the area not included in the first 110 ct. 781- G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\5-28-02.wpd 6 ,,,' 1 '3