The URL can be used to link to this page

2002 07 16 CCCity Council Agendas are available on the City's web page @www.la-quinta.org City Council Agenda CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER 78-495 Calle Tampico - La Quinta, California 92253 Regular Meeting Tuesday July 16, 2002 - 2:00 p.m. Beginning Res. No. 2002-108 Ord. No. 375 CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Council Members: Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. CLOSED SESSION - None NOTE: Time permitting, the City Council may conduct Closed Session discussions during the dinner recess. Additionally, persons identified as negotiating parties, do not attend the closed session when the City is considering acquisition of real property. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE RECONVENE 3:00 P.M. City Council Agenda Page 1 July 16, 2002 V. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or matters that are not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. Please watch the timing device on the podium. For all Business Session matters or Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak to come forward at the appropriate time. VI. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA VII. PRESENTATIONS Vill. WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE IX. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING HELD ON JUNE 20, 2002. 2. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD ON JULY 2, 2002. X. CONSENT CALENDAR Note: Consent Calendar items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved by one motion unless requested for separate consideration by a member of the City Council or the public. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED JULY 16, 2002. 2. TRANSMITTAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT DATED MAY 31, 2002. 3. TRANSMITTAL OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES REPORT DATED MAY 31, 2002, AND INVESTMENT SUMMARY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING JUNE 30, 2002. 4. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR AND ONE STAFF MEMBER TO ATTEND THE STATE-WIDE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE TO BE HELD IN SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, OCTOBER 6-9, 2002. 5. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE FINANCE DIRECTOR AND TWO MEMBERS OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD TO ATTEND THE 2002 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 12-13, 2002, IN SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA. 6. DENIAL OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FILED BY ANGELA QUINTANA, DATE OF LOSS: MAY 9, 2002. City Council Agenda Page 2 July 16, 200}2nn �l`1^ 7. DENIAL OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FILED BY WILFRED HUERTA, DATE OF LOSS: JANUARY 1, 2002. 8. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 30357, MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTRY CLUB. 9. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING MEASURE A. XI BUSINESS SESSION 1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003 CITY OF LA QUINTA BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING THE CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMIT. A. RESOLUTION ACTION 2. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPOINTMENT TO THE COACHELLA VALLEY ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP EXECUTIVE BOARD. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 3. CONSIDERATION OF SELECTION OF A VOTING DELEGATE AND AN ALTERNATE TO THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING - OCTOBER 2 THROUGH OCTOBER 5, 2002. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 4. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES SPECIAL TAX AND CALLING AN ELECTION THEREON FOR THE GENERAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 5, 2002, AND RELATED ACTIONS REGARDING COUNTY ELECTION SERVICES, BALLOT ARGUMENTS AND IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) 5. CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY TO TAKE ALL STEPS NECESSARY TO EXECUTE THE CITY'S RIGHTS UNDER THE BONDS, INCLUDING THE INITIATION OF LITIGATION AGAINST AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY (BONDING COMPANY) AND BLP DESERT (LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT) AS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 29052. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 6. CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 001 City Council Agenda Page 3 July 16, 2002 CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDED CITY OF LA QUINTA 2002/2003 MARKETING PLAN. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 8. CONSIDERATION OF A CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL WITH MATICH CONSTRUCTION FOR MEDIAN MODIFICATIONS/STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO CONSTRUCT LEFT -TURN LANES ON WASHINGTON STREET AT LAKE LA QUINTA DRIVE AS PART OF THE WASHINGTON STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 9. CONSIDERATION OF A FUNDING REQUEST FOR THE PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ART PIECES. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION XII. STUDY SESSION - None XIII. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1 . CITY COUNCIL AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORTS 2. CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS 3. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WORKSHOP/INFORMATION COMMITTEE (SNIFF) 4. C.V. MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (PERKINS) 5. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (SNIFF) 6. DESERT RESORTS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 7. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES COMMITTEE (HENDERSON) 8. MUSEUM EXPANSION COMMITTEE (ADOLPH/SNIFF) 9. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION & VISITORS AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 10. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION 11. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FREE LIBRARY SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE 12. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DESERT LIBRARY ZONE ADVISORY BOARD (HENDERSON) 13. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (PEI A) 14. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY/SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP (PENA) 15. INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES DATED JUNE 12, 2002 XIV. DEPARTMENT REPORTS 1 . CITY MANAGER A. RESPONSE(S) TO PUBLIC COMMENT 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK A. REPORT ON UPCOMING EVENTS 4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR JUNE, 2002 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR JUNE, 2002 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR JUNE, 2002 7. FINANCE DIRECTOR 8. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER REPORT FOR JUNE, 2002 9. POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT FOR JUNE, 2002 A. YEAR ENDING 2001 REPORT/TRAFFIC COLLISIONS AND CITATIONS. 00 't 10. FIRE CHIEF City Council Agenda Page 4 July 16, 2002 XV. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. XVI. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak form" and limit your comments to three (3) minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. XVII. PRESENTATIONS - NONE XVIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the start of City Council consideration of that item. The Mayor will invite individuals who have requested the opportunity to speak, to come forward at the appropriate time. Any person may submit written comments to the La Quinta City Council/ Redevelopment Agency before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of, or in opposition to, the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to the public hearing. 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29053, EXTENSION #2, A REQUEST FOR A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP WHICH CREATES 103 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 33+ ACRES NORTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF JEFFERSON STREET AND AVENUE 50. APPLICANT: LA QUINTA JEFFERSON FIFTY. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) 2. PUBLIC HEARING ON: 1) CERTIFICATION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-455; 2) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2002-087, A REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR 10 ACRES; AND 3) TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30521, A REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION OF 43.6 ± ACRES INTO 147 SINGLE FAMILY AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS LOTS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND MILES AVENUE. APPLICANT: LIDO EQUITY PARTNERS. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) 3. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL SETTING AND PLACEMENT OF RESIDENTIAL WASTE COLLECTION AND SERVICE FEES ON THE TAX ROLLS FOR RESIDENTIALLY DEVELOPED PROPERTY AND ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION SETTING COMMERCIAL AND ROLL -OFF WASTE COLLECTION AND SERVICE FEES. A. RESOLUTION ACTION(S) 00 5 City Council Agenda Page 5 July 16, 2002 XIX. ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to a regularly scheduled City Council Meeting to be held August 6, 2002, at 2:00 p.m in the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253, commencing with closed session items at 2:00 p.m. and open business session at 3:00 p.m. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting of Tuesday, July 16, 2002, was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico and on the bulletin board at the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce and at Stater Bros. 78-630 Highway 1 1 1, on Friday, July 12, 2002. DATED: July 12, 2002 JUNE S. GREEK, CIVIC City Clerk, City of La Quinta, California PUBLIC NOTICES The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at 777-7025, twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 777- 7025. A one (1) week notice is required. If background material is to be presented to the City Council during a City Council meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the 3:00 p.m session or the 7:00 p.m session. 00r, City Council Agenda Page 6 July 16, 2002 T4ht 4 4Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: JULY 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Demand Register Dated July 16, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Approve Demand Register Dated July 16, 2002 BACKGROUND: Prepaid Warrants: 50075 - 501461 3,033,502.78 50147 - 501591 41,661.43 Wire Transfers} 21,549.97 P/R 9070 - 91511 115,110.01 P/R Tax Transfers} 31,676.33 Payable Warrants: 50160 - 502721 591,845.09 $3,835,345.61 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Demand of Cash -City $3,349,984.43 Demand of Cash -RDA $485,361.18 Falconer, Vina�ce Director AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION CONSENT CALENDAR STUDY SESSION PUBLIC HEARING 007 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK TRANSACTIONS 6/26/02 - 7/09/02 7/03/02 WIRE TRANSFER - DEFERRED COMP $5,948.67 7/03/02 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS $10,159.30 7/03/02 WIRE TRANSFER - CREDIT UNION $5,442.00 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT $21,549.97 0nr� 002 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 1:44PM 07/09/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** PAYMENT AMOUNT 50160 07/09/02 &01755 BARBARA BARBA 150.00 50161 07/09/02 &01756 SARAH BROWN 25.00 50162 07/09/02 &01757 LYNN BRUCE 25.00 50163 07/09/02 &01758 MARTHA GUEST 44.00 50164 07/09/02 &01759 BETTY HARRIS 60.00 50165 07/09/02 &01760 JUNE KANDEL 25.00 50166 07/09/02 &01761 PATRICIA MAIER 55.00 50167 07/09/02 &01762 YON HEE OH 25.00 50168 07/09/02 &01763 MARY PETRO 25.00 50169 07/09/02 &01764 RAY STRAND 25.00 50170 07/09/02 &01765 VALLEY POOL & SPA 55.00 50171 07/09/02 &01766 JOYCE WAYMAN 25.00 50172 07/09/02 &01767 ALBERTA YEAROUT 100.00 50173 07/09/02 &01768 JNP ENTERPRISES 5.00 50174 07/09/02 &01769 JUAREZ ICE CREAM 3.00 50175 07/09/02 &01770 BRIAN WILSON 20.00 50176 07/09/02 ABD100 LORI ABDELNOUR 5000.00 50177 07/09/02 ADT100 ADT SECURITY SVC INC 341.91 50178 07/09/02 ALB006 ALBERTSONS STORE #6567 138.54 50179 07/09/02 ALC050 BOB ALCALA 14.00 50180 07/09/02 AME175 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES 42.00 50181 07/09/02 ARC100 ARCH 496.01 50182 07/09/02 AVA100 AVAYA INC 1239.80 50183 07/09/02 BAN015 DAVE BANG ASSOCIATES INC 162.92 50184 07/09/02 BER150 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC 22966.50 50185 07/09/02 BES100 BEST BUY CO INC 323.21 50186 07/09/02 BI0100 BIO TOX 79.40 50187 07/09/02 BSG100 B & S GRAPHICS 492.38 50188 07/09/02 CAD010 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 212.55 50189 07/09/02 CAL013 CAL ASSOC PARK & RECREATN 165.00 50190 07/09/02 CAL400 CALLAWAY MOTORSPORTS 804.31 50191 07/09/02 CAR300 CARQUEST 10.01 50192 07/09/02 CAT150 CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY 32.00 50193 07/09/02 CDPO50 CD PUBLICATIONS 349.00 50194 07/09/02 CECO08 CHECKMATE EXCHANGE INC 102.70 50195 07/09/02 COA013 COACHELLA VALLEY ARTS 65.00 50196 07/09/02 COA021 COACHELLA VALLEY ECONOMIC 6000.00 50197 07/09/02 COA067 COACHELLA VLLY PONTIAC 822.75 50198 07/09/02 COA075 COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED 345504.00 50199 07/09/02 COM015 COMPUTER U LEARNING CENTR 825.00 50200 07/09/02 COM030 COMSERCO 137.41 50201 07/09/02 COR150 CORPORATE EXPRESS 934.88 50202 07/09/02 COV065 COVERED JC 8043.00 50203 07/09/02 CPR104 CPRS DIST XI 50.00 50204 07/09/02 CRA050 DANIEL CRAWFORD JR 168.51 50205 07/09/02 CVA010 C V A G 75498.02 50206 07/09/02 DAN200 DANONE WATERS OF NORTH 336.25 009 003 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF 1:44PM 07/09/02 PAGE 2 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT 50207 07/09/02 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC 1602.31 50208 07/09/02 DOU200 LES DOUGLAS 511.00 50209 07/09/02 END051 ENDICOTT ENTERPRISES 111.17 50210 07/09/02 ENR100 ENRG FUEL USA INC 17.80 50211 07/09/02 EVI100 E-VIC PEST CONTROL 450.00 50212 07/09/02 EXP200 EXPRESS DETAIL 455.00 50213 07/09/02 FON200 FONTANA-SOUTHWEST MOBILE 215.50 50214 07/09/02 GAR040 GARZA TURF & POWER EQUIP 224.00 50215 07/09/02 GE0010 GEORGE'S GOODYEAR 25.00 50216 07/09/02 HAR100 JOHN HARDCASTLE 30.04 50217 07/09/02 HOA010 HUGH HOARD INC 777.72 50218 07/09/02 HOM030 HOME DEPOT 1393.87 50219 07/09/02 H00050 FAYE HOOPER 100.00 50220 07/09/02 HOP200 HOPSONS HEALTH EQUIP CTRE 89.38 50221 07/09/02 ICB010 ICBO 117.92 50222 07/09/02 IMA100 IMAGE SOURCE 221.96 50223 07/09/02 INF020 INFORMATION PUBLICATIONS 95.90 50224 07/09/02 INF030 INFORMATION RESOURCES 355.00 50225 07/09/02 INT014 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF 50.00 50226 07/09/02 JPRO10 JP REPROGRAPHICS 433.70 50227 07/09/02 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 1564.72 50228 07/09/02 KRI100 BRUCE KRIBBS CONSTRUCTION 5150.00 50229 07/09/02 LAI030 LAIDLAW TRANSIT INC 276.05 50230 07/09/02 LES020 JANELLE LESLIE 12.60 50231 07/09/02 L00010 LOCK SHOP INC 32.52 50232 07/09/02 LOW100 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC 215.48 50233 07/09/02 MAC005 MACHADO ENVIROMENTAL CORP 3245.50 50234 07/09/02 MCDO10 MC DOWELL AWARDS 94.39 50235 07/09/02 MUN010 MUNI FINANCIAL SERV INC 10178.42 50236 07/09/02 NAT023 NATL LEAGUE CITIES INSTIT 1470.00 50237 07/09/02 NEW250 NEWTON MANUFACUTRING CO 922.81 50238 07/09/02 NIC101 NICKERSON & ASSOC INC 850.00 50239 07/09/02 NIE300 PAM NIETO 60.45 50240 07/09/02 OFF005 OFFICE DEPOT INC 363.27 50241 07/09/02 PAR003 PARAGON SIGNS 134.69 50242 07/09/02 PER010 RONALD A PERKINS 26.63 50243 07/09/02 PIT100 NOEL PITTMAN 42.00 50244 07/09/02 POW020 DEBORAH POWELL 56.17 50245 07/09/02 POW300 POWER PERSONNEL INC 1749.81 50246 07/09/02 PRI020 THE PRINTING PLACE 355.58 50247 07/09/02 PUR100 PURKISS ROSE-RSI 830.50 50248 07/09/02 QUI100 QUILAN PUBLISHING GROUP 159.89 50249 07/09/02 RAL050 RALPHS GROCERY CO 35.40 50250 07/09/02 RAS020 RASA - ERIC NELSON 765.00 50251 07/09/02 RAS035 CHARLOTTE RASHMI-GRAFF 140.00 50252 07/09/02 RIV020 RIV CNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLR 338.00 50253 07/09/02 RIV021 RIVERSIDE COUNTY AUDITOR 4075.80 50254 07/09/02 RIV080 RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH 1365.00 50255 07/09/02 RIV101 RIV COUNTY SHERIFF/INDIO 23178.30 010 l ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 1:44PM 07/09/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 3 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME PAYMENT AMOUNT 50256 07/09/02 RMM100 RM MARKETING LLC 837.70 50257 07/09/02 ROS010 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP 30377.62 50258 07/09/02 SCI100 LOUISE SCIUTTO 120.00 50259 07/09/02 SK1051 SKILLPATH SEMINARS 199.00 50260 07/09/02 SMA010 SMART & FINAL 100.27 50261 07/09/02 SOU007 SOUTHWEST NETWORKS, INC 2567.50 50262 07/09/02 STA050 STAPLES 5.37 50263 07/09/02 STE003 M W STEELE GROUP INC 6329.11 50264 07/09/02 TOP010 TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 147.08 50265 07/09/02 USB100 US BANK 956.55 50266 07/09/02 VID050 VIDEO DEPOT 15.92 50267 07/09/02 WAL010 WAL MART COMMUNITY 175.40 50268 07/09/02 WES009 WEST COAST TRANSPORTATION 500.00 50269 07/09/02 WIN010 WINSTON TIRES 890.72 50270 07/09/02 W00100 DEBBIE WOODRUFF 256.67 50271 07/09/02 XER010 XEROX CORPORATION 6821.72 50272 07/09/02 YOU100 YOUNG ENGINEERING SERVICE 4554.15 CHECK TOTAL 591,845.09 Olt 005 Z fi N M d' L r m O r-1 N . O H z N O O x m m m m m m m m m r o w U H m N m N m N N N N N N N N N N El 1D El El � E � g rJ+ W H H H H H H E. H H H H F a a m Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O N H O O O O O O O O O O O O z w F z o u n v o Ln u n in in z O N N �o N Ln N N N N N >+ O H a o O O o o O o o O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O R' O In to LO N In C4 Ln un (\3 N Q' �D N u7 (\1 N N W N H � U H a z z 0 0 u) a a a H a H a a a a a a co a co < u)< < < r� < < W r� z cn F u) H u) El 0: F CG H u) H u) H u) F cn H cn F z H u) O m O u7 O (f) O o 0 z O u7 O u) 0 u) O u� 0 u) O H 0 u) W H < F H < F O F U H < H H < FH < H < H CO H < U F a a a x x 14 a a a a D a H a v cx U cz V cx w C4 w a U cx U cz U a U C4 u a m C4 U O H 0 0 0 o O O o O o O 0 x ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ z V 2 2 z z z z z z z z z z z z 2 z z z z z z z z H m D w a W a w ED w a w a w o w a w m w a w D w a w w> w> W> W> w> W> W> w> W> W> W> W ❑ w w w w w w w w w w w w u) rx a a a a a a a a a a x w w v w H o a O w I > W N M O N 1n N M m N m z z v' l0 r O N m r N m N O H ❑ H ."J 1n M ui N H 1n m r �o - H Z a' 1n l0 l0 l0 O l0 d' In O Ln C' ❑ rl r-i rl H `-I rl H rl H rl N H H `,4 � z a � m w oa c� I o 0 w F a o 0 0 O O o O O o O w O o o n n O o O O O o 0 W o 0 o cr v O O o o O o 0 z m m m r r m r m m m m z M M M M M M M M M M H M H z o 0 0 0 o O O o O O o O p o o O o 0 o O O O O o O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U cD H H H H H H H rL o 0 0 0 0 0 0 c) 0 0 0 C, O M O FC o a Ln u) a a < FC w w a z u a a < < w w x w x 0 ❑ 0 x W H m O U CL ❑ O Cr z O >+ a z Z O C7 FC z L H C a FC CQ Q] x H w w 3 a � a El u) w » a x x > x w r� 14 CO r-C z H H W fx >+ a U a O cZ CL z cz H z H z z > a >+ a ❑ < >1 < w a < o < 0 w z as 0 a w h a > x > h H W W %. O > 1n l0 r m Ol (D H N M v in 1 � T) to Ln Ln Ln �o �o �.Q IDD � �o o � O >+ r r r r r r r r r r r r U H U H O O o CD CDo O O O (D o t < U w w w w w w w w w w w 1 a z M a H N N \o N m r m N O a H o z O N r x V m N m N m Ol m N N m O 41 C7 E < F < m N H N H O H O H O r H O r F O rr F N �o H O r F O r H N H N H a a m Ln N H Z H 0 O o CD O CD O O O O i- r c rl Ln � CD O CDCD O O O m w z q O O Ln M O N O O O O r-I d' m M C rl N d' m O M » < O H O N N a � O O O O O O rl d' O o rl O Ln N O O CD ,-� z W O N a W > O M O O N a O CD O O O rl a' M U7 w m M O V' rl CD N V' CD l0 m ? O G a In H a a 0 a cn w a a < a H a a ° a a s CQ a a s a z a a ❑ a a C Z r.0 H co FC H H H r.0 El w z �C E+ >+ W < H W £ FC H < F O w < H FC H ❑ O < H < H W 0 H O H m < 0 H x o: o H H U)F O a a 0 H x O o H O H x U o H P: O H O a O H O H a H V H E- a a W D CZ O > a U -, a V >> U o; z a a' O H W W a U > a D a O > H Cr O ❑ q O ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ O n ❑ O ❑ H E O ❑ cn U) O ❑ a O ❑ U O O ❑ 00 z ❑ m O ❑ w z H V V7 z w z a z w z O z w z 5 z w z O z w a z W x (Z z a z w ❑ FC z W CZ H z W "z x W Z W z w W z W ❑ > w W > w W > w w > w w > ❑ z > < a < a > a < > cn z > O O > C7 < > 0 x Ul D: a cr o: N < U) H 0.l a a Uw Ln rn rn H q O W n m N 10 N �o to Un M �o Ln m > z > z W £ M m r-I N O .-1 M Ln �o u) to M N M O O N m M H z o O m CD to ID M N M N to O N N to rl r q H x O v' H N N N a N a, z a < w w m o; i o O w H (Z W O O O O O O to N O O O T O O O N to m O ID m CDp7 O CD CDv� O �o tovo O Ln � Lf) to to z m M m .-i to r-1 r M N Q) O O CD O M O 61 O Ol O N M O1 O F z O O O O N r r N N M a O CD O o O CD CD CD CD CDm Ol M n M o N 0 N CD o M n r-I Ln rl U U Ln ri H ,-I < 0 0 0 (D O o 0 0 O o 0 0 U) w U z U z r Ln m a ❑ z M o o U U W U H Ln o w w a co c>n o z a H U z U ]> cn a C w a w O ) a El " IH -I cn FC o w w H a z > a w U H a H w ❑ a z s M z O a < z U z pQ H <❑ < H E- z S nQ U w U w m E+ U a H 44 z w h h m a <fc� < a a z 0 0 > r m w rn 0 O O O o O 0 0 O 1) Ln r 0 o 0 0 V H V H O o o O ❑ m H ❑ F ❑ fn a U a w U 0Z 1.J > FC U w w w w < FC < FC FC FC FC 007 z Q) v' Ln �o r m m O H N M d' M O o .-1 N M Ln �o N N N N N ri H O F z N O O \ M r x U m N N N N N N N N N N C) m N m m m N N m O W F N O O O O O O O O O O O O N O N N N O O O C9 r r r r r r r r r r r r l0 r to to r I- r F F El F F El H El El El El F H H F F H F a a Ln N N O O O O Ln O O O O O H O m m Ln O N O O N H LT N 0 O O O N O O O O Cl N a' M O m O Ln O O z W F z N m O CDLn O M O O O O O M LT N r M m O MLn . a l0 �o O to N CD O O O O O N r m N r N �+ O H �.o r N to H Q' ui LT H M d' H N N N N N N H N N H N a O N O O m Ln m N 'V' M Ln p� N to M N N M �o N r- r is N H of M v N H N N u) F W H a a U U U U U U a a ❑ a< z EE-, H m H W ElO Elr� H El ❑ O O u) O U U U U U O O O O U O O W H F El El>>>>> x x x �' x "4 H El�-7 ElW F H 0+ U ElFC v] u7 cn cn cn U U U U U U U m q H H O LU H a O W cn W O `.4 x `.4 `.4 `.4 W x W x w x W x W x W x fx O a c3' O U LY O G] C1' O m m m £ m w x a x O u) > x o ❑ U U U U U U U U U U U o < q z❑ a❑ x x a a a❑ a z U z 0 z z F z H z U z O O O O O z W H M W z W z z z z z z z z z z z W H W �4 W H W W Cu W W G., W m W > H > < ll� < < < < < < > (D > O > x > H H H H H > m ❑ m a a, a a, a a, a n. a a, a o4 a a, a m a a a m a a, H ❑ O m w > z o z 0 z o z w z a w w w U W " ❑ x O W > I > m r M to to r of O m M N Ol Ln r to v' m m Ln Ln z z N Q' M l0 M M M M M r M m M m to lD to lO to M H ❑ H r Ol V' a' a' L' Q' d' d' H to N H .-1 `-1 H H m H z <r m Ln Ln � Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Lc) �o rn r r rn rn u-) N N N N N N N N N N N �C z m w m rx I O O c F cz O Ir r r r r r r r Ir r O \o rn o 0 0 0 o O W o ul Ln N Ln Ln N u) Ln Ln Ln Ln o m o 0 o O o 0 m O Ln Ln Ln Ln to Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O Ln L9 O O O O O O ,7 H Ol Ol Ol 01 01 Q\ Ol Ol m Ql Ol M Ol 61 r r r r r 61 z N O O O O O O O O O o O O O 1D �D lD to to to to to l0 10 r lD to \o lD to to \o �D H z H N N N N N N N N N N N N H H r M v M d H O Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O O O Ln Ln Ln Ln In Ln O N to (1) N U K� cD o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z z Kc H U U U U U U U U U U U W z z z z z z z z z z z fZ U W W a M H P: fx a a W o4 o4 o' a a a 0.a. Pa. 04 o a a a a m o z z z z W a Ln U H H H H H H H H H H H U m u) m m m W O z z z z z z z z 2 z z z u) x F-c u) W W W W W W W W W W W H U C4 x x x x x x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 a � O x w Lz Lz La w Ln w w w w �a U 0.4 W W Cu W W W E-F C'J < H H F-1 H H U a z z z z z z Z z z z z z z N Z z z z z z O m H < << FC FC FC FC < n x U D D❑ 0 5 u) FC n m £ E E m O u) Y� Oi u) H H F H H < FC fz w c4 a cz c4 (x a (4 ca cz z a H w w w w w a O > z a z x x fz fx f4 r4 fx x U) o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a a ❑ W W W W W W W w W w W W < cn z ❑ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m U U U U U U H w w z O > Ln o 0 0 0 0 0 o O O 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 (D o M o .-( Ln Ln L ) Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O O O >+ o H H H H - H H- H H o 0 0 o O o U F+ z C4 z fx Iz lz z a W m a a Ul O 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ q a U H FC W W W W W W W W W w W W H m < < < < FC FC < U m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m U U U U U U 014 08 z r V' N to r m H .1 '-+ N H In N to N Ql r N H N < a 0 r-i N O E z O \ r x U N m Ol N 0 m m N m N CD W C7 El r-C O r F N m F 0 r H O r E (00 r F r H 0 r F N io F N F O r F N �o H O r E. a a OD N H z F M o O 0 o o 0 r 0 o o o r M m M O o o o � W £ z D O O H N M v' N O N O O N M CY) d' O Ln N r M N F Q co M H O r u) Ln m r'1 a O rl H O O O O O Lc) m M O O O N l0 M O O O H O N InH E+ CD � - U' z r N O O �/l QO CD O O r N N X W O - O O Ln N --i m z 0 � M fk w O m a' U H Ln Ln Cl) (n < z m w nx M z w El a a s a z a F a a s a w a a a a Ela a < z H w< P4 E+ U) < 0 F+ W E+ w H FC E-H o C4 E+ K� F o< ❑ H H FC H< < H << ❑ E < F a < W O H O E W O F F+ ax O x E U 0 E m U) O H E z O E a O H a O H a W a W 0 H ax O F a' O E C) U H E a x a U rz < a z s o ax < cz O U cx H x rx H x a C4 z rx a s o E a C��G o > ff CL 0 ❑ U ❑ C4 o a ❑ 0 ❑ a 0 ❑ a 0 ❑ m CZ 0 ❑ u% z 0 ❑ w a w a o ❑ x H o ❑ U a O ❑ E z z H U U) z W Dx O z W Hz < o W W z W W z W < z z W W W z W W Ql z W V H U H z W vl z W a El z W a O W ❑ > H O > a W > E Cn > ❑ W > H z > W > x W > x W x W > U) FC > ul z > >] W (n x (Z U W FC i > > a H !x W W U W c r O o Ln o H ❑ P.' N a' H Ln O M O 61 0 > I > W O N H N N I Ln M v M M m z H ❑ z H a O in I O M Ir O M N 0 N U N U N o H ❑ z O 0.: r-+ r H O r M O N U U V 0 m O H x < z C4 < CQ W A I O 0 O G E a m m O O M O O 61 61 o N O W rn r Ln v �o � CD o O o m Ln CD o CD o 10 �o o o rn Ln m Ln �j Ol 01 r H m m 61 Ol m M m 61 z O o rl LD M o In �.o o �o d' io T �o '-1 o rl �-o N m o O H z H H N M .n M H H O Q O M CD O Ln iI7 f-1 O H M (n Ln N O H CD Ln CDO to Ol CD N CD M V U H H H H H rl rl H l H r.0 o r1 CD Ln o H 0 r-1 0 H CD 0 H 0 rl 0 to 0 ul 0 M 0 H CD 0 H U H ❑ U E+ U E O U U w H z W CO F H z H cn E z O < H FC H W H V M a U W < W z z a z o o O a a FC 0 z Y r O a O s H z W a z x .W7 �W-1 >+ >+ �Wl < a o x x < a s < a I < O £ F E W > > > > > o a Z Y+ F U IV+ H ��-1 a a a a fZ 0 W H FC ❑ < $ cn W W O a W r,C a W a W a W s W a W W E U Y N a < a < a a a z a x V x v x U x 0 x v x Q o a w cn a FC a o ❑ a < x < E H ❑ w x C 0 < 0 << 0 0 < 0 z 0 X 0 U) z U U U U U U U U U U U U H W z O W > O O 0 O m M H r r Ln Ln O a 0 >1 U F O C a o M P; ul H F Ln O a O O U H O << N O QO O < �.o O r.4 r O < H O x M O x U H �U < u r-C U r.� � ❑ 41 u O u O U o Uu 0 0 u O u 0 U 15 009 z N m O. N N m Q m C N l0 r m m m O O Ln m Ln • N N m m m N N N O El z N O rn O \ Ln x r U N N O m m N N N m m m m m N m m m m m m (IJ O) (3) N O W F N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O �o �10 r r r r r r r tr r- r r r r r Q0 r r r r rL x F F F+ F F F F F E+ El F F+ F F F F F F F+ F F F+ F F a a m Ln .-i O) m m N H (n to m O) to N r N Ln r O O O H N O O O N E+ O - M Cl) r H N O N N N O N a' m v' 61 O CD CD O O O .H z El m N - m m to Cl 0) v' m - r-1 N M N m O N m O O m ❑ �' rl N H H M H rl I r .-1 f Ln Ln to \0 O m �0 >+ O N H H O l0 O m � E m N O N a Ln N ,-1 m O O .-+ N m O O n O r m M O m m M M v' N W CO x Ol ,-I m o U) .--I U v m z z cz Ln O D Z W r H x F F F d z n ❑ ElW F a' a. O Ul cn < E a El H El z < 0 El w z ElF W El U' El F Co H ❑ F F O O O cz O W O H O ❑\ 0 r� F E1 F U: F F Z a F 3 U F z O H a [z (f) c!1 U7 (fl U7 cn (n U] cn cn cn cn Cn to (n fn m x O Z a a U a iI F x U: C7 O H O W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W O " O O O O O C9 to O z [z ❑ H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H ❑ F ❑ X.0 ❑ ❑ I0 z a. ❑ H z U z a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a z z z x z w z ID H w %. x H Cn w a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a w w w x. W w r x x W z w > a a a a a a a a a a a a, as a s o. a> F> a> a> N x x> H ❑ z z o x x o 0 0 0 o z 5 a o x x o w 0 x x< w x cn cn cn rn W cn cn cn cn cn cn m cn m cn cn Ix ❑ w w U w m O1 H N N r .o H H r m r m M N if7 N O O I H ❑ P', m O m N r O m N N O O O v' v' I I O I I r O W l m l ri d' m r m m U m m m M I l r r > I > x m m a' m d' CO R' m Ol O m N m O) m w m w w m m cD m Ol I N H O O) z z M r r r cn N m M N ul O N O O O O N r O O r H ❑ H O Ln Ln m r r fn �-1 \O .-1 l0 l0 l0 O .-� H N H z M m m m m m m m m m M m M m M V7 r r r r- r r r r O H > > > Ln ❑ m m m M M M M m m v c v v v v v �r N O U U � H x 2 04� x w x I o 0 0 W F [z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O M if7 O O N W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O> CD CD m x O CD O O O CD CD CD O CD CD CD O CD O CD Ln O N Ln ul O O m '.� H H H H H H rl H r1 H H H H H m O) r In Ln to � M z O O CD O O O (D O O O O O O O O O O O O O M tfJ O l0 V' O F z N N N N N H H N N N N N N N N N N N m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m Lf) O O d' O LI) O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ID N H r ID U U Ln FC; O o O O O O O O o O O O O O O o O O O O m O O O x F a 0 m C4 z O n cn x x x x x x x x x h CDcn w Cl) m m x x U)m x m m m x x m cn cn [. Ln w w w w w w w w w w w W w w w w w ❑ O a cz z cz cz cz cz cz cz a a a a a a a a a a a a, a a a a a a a, a s a, a a, a, a a, 0 m X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X H [u m I W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W X 3 W W F W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 17 F KC I-1 z F F F F F F F F F F F rF F ElF F El U) U CD C7 0 3 5 a a a a a CL a C) a W r a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a w z < rx n4 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a w x H o a o z cz cz cz Cx cz cz cz a a a a cz cz cz cz a > cx z > > > z a ❑ O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O a x z U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U ❑ U U U ❑ F+ w W z O > O O O o 0 o O o 0 0 O O 0 O o o O m O O o 0 o n m Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln �n Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln u-) u) u� Ln un un �o o �n ,� ,� ,� ID1 O N .� .-� H H H f1 H - - H H - H H H - .-1 O r1 O O O O N r�► U F a cx a z cz cz cz cz cz cz cz a a a a cc cz > o < < < < z U H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a x >>> < U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U ❑ 0010 N M M M M M M M M M M M a o N O F z O \ o x r O W U F N O N O N O N O N O N N N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O C9 r.0 r F r F r H r F r H 10 H r H r F r F r H r H r F r F r F a a m N F z H O O Ln N m O O O r O O CD O CD O Lnr N co N O O O O W 2 OJ O M CO H H r O Ln N r H Ln N v) r � a � clj N rl N I N o O r o w o O O O o u7 0 O 0 o N l0 M M M N O l0 H Ln f-1 H r H O Ln a' Ln Ln d' Ln (N a N N z o w c� W N u) cn O n zo co FC O x x w x w e w a a a a< a x U a a s F a u) a a C s a a F�4 U 2 o E+ E+ F o U >> U E+ O F O a FIi F+ O f4 20 F > W F z O H F O H x F O W f4 W ox F O W. F O cn \ W H 3 F W U) F a of F ❑ F a F EH F U H F El El< H H F a x H O w H z U z a O El U El U cz O U a O a O a W z O F H a O w a O a s O z W z W cz O a W cx O w > z c4 U H x H x ❑ 2 [Z < fZ ❑ z ❑ cZ ❑ z a W ❑ z w w ❑ z u) \ ❑ a Z U ❑ z F W ❑ z :E: a x a ❑ z a ❑ 2 a W H u) W z H z H W > F z F z w > F u) W > U U W > V` W > W W w H > x w > W fZ W > H a H z W > W a w > > < u] ❑ rz ❑ a ❑ O U O U 2 H O [n 2 U c4 F W > H u) O+ W a W H H r4 F W w U W H ❑ c4 O > I > W 0.l c Ol 0 m 0 Ln rl 61 r ri z H ❑ z H E r N r N r �o - �o r Ln O Ln d' M V' O W In W o N H ❑ z Ln rl Ln H O N O N a' rl O H r a' M r-I co d' co C' d' O H x FC 2 a r-C W W W a I O O w H O N O l0 O O1 M r r Ol O W pa oc) O� co co M u) O CD On Ln O O �O "o CDd' O �O u) Ln m W OJ m v lD O O O M M Ln M m M m d> dl (3) M M m M O O r O Ln O �o O O rl ID O r-I O O r O r H �o M H F z r M M a' ri N M r1 'T H M M M .H O O O Ln rl ul .-+ Ln M Ln v' O N Ln N O Ln Ln O r Ln Ln O N 0 O U U O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 Ln f-i Ln d' rl ri Ln .--I w a a x F x F a H m H D a H D s a O s O n w O w w CD Ln [*. o w o U z U z cx a z H a H u) w 3 o 3 o w w < u) u) H H W < O H x a s ❑ F I CL' w CC w u) a u) s cn F z u) U FC F LW W O O vl r� rL W H F FC F r-t x W x W ';C a W a F u) W O O u) W cr W a C7 U ❑ a z cQ H 3 S F F C7 p F E. W z W a W I r.✓+ a E+ a F u) a < <❑ r a w z w z F z F a O ❑ o U w U u) W z < w x < aFZ� fk o O z O z W u) W u) cn H ❑ U' a H > a a F z N cx N cz C4 O z x a ❑ < W W W 2 2 1 x O < W o u) z ❑❑ ❑❑ a w w w w r=4 c� h F W 2 0 W > 0 0 Ln Ln 0 .-a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a O EH O F 0 N z 0 N z �.o O u) I0 O cn 0 N m Ln O ❑ 0 ri a 0 .� H 0 N a 0 N z v O rz v O a O O 0 �-1 r� rx `` 17 U H r,C r� W W O z z > x O FC FC W FC FC U ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ W W W W w C7 C7 t7 x 0011 O rl Ln �D r co o1 O N M a' Ln W H N QD r L M N O cz H O z al O \ r r x U N N N OJ OJ OJ CD N N N N mCO W N N OJ O W a a H CD N N H N �D F N �o H N ID H N N �D H O r El CD r H (D r H CD r F ClN r F �D FE N �D H O r H O r F CD O r El N �D H m u CO lD N lD lD r CD O Lr) a O N N cD O O N .H F z F � H r lD N H O CD �D .-I r M a\ C' O M d> dl Ol O w X z O lD r N N r r W N O N R' to N Ln O O N O r O co N N d' f-1 M O O Ol O r H r� N m Ln >1 < O x N r r H H N M a+ FC N r O oo N l0 O O O M r r O M Ol O O O M al OJ 61 r r-1 Ol N al u1 o) r M r H N O U u) x w U W O u a U H x °o n x U < U m a H a a a < a a+ s m < ❑ a 4C a < o a ❑ z O u) \ x H H O W W H O H O H O f1+ z H z 0 <O H H O H O W U H El a, W ai H I.L' H H a O H U) H x F H U) W H a C7 H 0- a,W w (z o ❑ z �i o u) w u) w u) w u) w u) w u) w u) w u) w u) w u) w Dx o U Ci O W m G:i U o w Qua o EDO Qi H H cr xi o U z (r' U fj w ('J ❑ z O U ❑ z H a H a H a H a H a H a H a H a H a H a ❑ z 2) a ❑ z H U ❑ z z ❑ z Rya ❑ ❑ z " U ❑ z m H m W > w a w > cr, W > w a4 a, a a, DW a, D-i a4 (1, w a, a a, as Oa a. a a, a W > H u) W > a W w a, > a w > x w > \ a w Pa U Cl H FC O u) .7 u) .D u) m u) O u) O u) ❑ u) D u) .7 m O u) z H x W of < w U z W W G� U W I -I ❑ O a: [i] M 61 N M co Ln v' 4' d' 'Q' ID m u1 N W Ln N N co M N I m v' M N r H M O O N O N �o O n O O H Ln O N Ln H ❑ H H �D z O v './) .H H H N H N O N O u r o H O r O H o M I- lD H x (Y) O .-i O r1 H a' O a' O O N u N z a, < m w m 0 I o o w H a: W O O O O O O r C r r N r N N N r d Ln No r o r N O O O O N O O O O O m O O O OD m N N CO OJ N N m OD O m W n iI) O O CO O O ❑ z r M r M .H N M O CD O M O M O f'') O M O M O M O N O M O O O M O .H Lf) M O H if) M O H z N N r M M - - C M d' o' r M N N d' M N d' O O if7 M �) M L M v' N Q' N a' ) d' Ln C N d' u7 a' to N fM Ln v' O N O N Lc) M rl O H O H U U o H 0 0 0 H 0 H 0 H 0 H 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 H 0 - 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 W a z H v z o W H H H < cn W U M CD z a U a n w w a m o m a r.� a F s H U z x H a a w !L << H a u z z < W H U ❑❑ U ❑ 0x EH 0 H 0 H 0 H 0 H 0 H 0 H 0 F+ 0 EA 0 H 0 W 04 W x C4' a O H 0 H a z m H a s < O a4 w a, w a4 w a, w w w a, w a w as w a, w as w O 0 u) O F H < a x x x ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ x o w a a < a< a: O z x z x x W W W W W W W W W W W U) w O m C7 O w O w a u) ❑ z 00 1 J ID D x O x O x O x O x O x O x O x O x O x 0 x FC w O x U H H z H z H E+ W z O W D O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o >, U H O x O H a o < M O f) o x fM 0 x M 0 x M 0 x M 0 � M 0 x M 0 x M 0 x M o 2 O 0 O N a H o m O H N O W M oell 0H W 0 H FC U x x O x O x o x 0 x 0 x 0 x o x O x O x 0 x 0 x 0 x o x U H H z H z H 0012 Z a) O m M H N O - M Ln N M d` r in Ln Ln ,� v a' O E z N O O m r x U CD C N N m m N N m m N m N m m O W El CD OD O O O O O O O N O N O O N r� W F F E E F H E E F H F F F E F P. P. Ln O O M r l0 CD CD N O N Ln M CD LC) r r 0) Ol CD O O l0 Ln N N �n In M H Z E O O to N N O to �] O M H �n �n O r H M C r d' Q\ m >-i O r-1 M M a O O O N O Ln O N m O O O r r O O to N v' in In O M d a O a, D N N U) U U) n Ln in M to Qj in U) r M W H W a M rn C7 0 Ln O El z N H N > (N m U) z z H z Ln a z M H H U) H a H H a s H H 0 r H H El H H '- E U) El U) U) CG a EH U) z H o w w a u u a a >> a a > a a a lz� < C ❑ ❑ < z < < W < < FC z E Z E H << E Z P+ E E E E U El a E 0 O 1- 0 0 0 0 w 0 u. 0 o O 0 O U) W H E+ o. P. F F z z E+ W C4 H F a El El >+ F a H W u o H w a x x a o x w w a w 0 x a o 0 a co 0z C Dx < o > ff a 0 ❑ U) cz U) o: o Q o w U) O ❑ F F 0 ❑ E W z H o ❑ C4 O ❑ U o O Q 0 ❑ Z w H 0 ❑ cr O n a u, z 0n Cl' fli w w w w o w w w CQ w U z w w w w x w w F co X w W > > W H > co U) > z C7 > > cn > > Z CL > ❑ > ❑ W W P, a W W O H z W Z z z co U) (14 ❑ ❑ U a U) H x U) co H Z w W U W H io U l0 Ol O W too N r N r-I > I > iU Ln �n N O m r if) O m H m d' m cr �r H r ,H m m H O M H ❑ H 'j mil' 4' 0 r Lo Lo N U N O O CO O un un CD r N CD ❑ H rl Cn w m H H N a M H O N m d' H x a z a ro w m a I O O w H (]' O O O O l0 M O O N O O O O CD W CD Cl O O M (n M Ln O O O O CD O O W C.) O CD O Ln Ln to O O Ln in O O O O O E O Ol Ol tf) Ol 41 CSC Q1 M M Ol M M in Ln r Z m m o 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O LO <r o to o to lD lD to to r ID r r r co to H Z N to O' m H to M (N r r H H 0 0 0 ,-1 m �n Ln Ln rn Ln � Ln CD Ln Ln �n Ln o U-) 0 m m r to N N �o a N N M N M Ln N U U Ln r.� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 Ln W w z z o 0 a O O m U) H H O H H H H U H H El El u a s a o U U a M z z > > E E z H H El H O O 0 U) U) a 2 Z U) U) w U) Ln U U U U 00 E W W :E ❑ CL4 H H a a U U H W H H O cr U z z fZ < K� <L a W W W U) U) z a z << H 3 z z < to co W Cn FC v) H P. C. > FC 0 0 a o o ro as r4 w z�P: z w H H H 0 0 0 o H H E a a O O w a a z E E O O O o a s 0 U U a m H a< a 0x 0 0 x x 3: w x O w FC 0 z z a s -1 11 < a u) U) U) ❑ 3 > (Di a s w w rx 0x w w a a 0 < a w w a s w w U U o w x w w x Q a O F E z z 0 5 H z U 3 3 U a ❑ z z a W H H 04 a < < O O O FC U U) h I7 a a a E E H Cu W Z O > v v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O u) O CD O CD M N H CD O CDH V el 00 F F 0o [Z a HH z z HH H H CDC.) H co CDHH U 3 3 CD U CD Q U H z z w w H H a z � w o 0 0 U U H H ti h x x x x a a a a s x 0013 Z N H to H r - m H m H O N to r m H Ol H O N .--1 N N N M N v' Ln 1n N O1 v' O 1n H Ln N Ln M ul N O a a E o z .-1 .-i O rn r O W x U E m O m O m O m O m O m O O\ O O O m O m O Ol O m O Q1 O m N N O N O m N m N m N m N m N a a m E E H H E H H H E E E H H E+ E E H E E E E+ H N H E Z w H 2 N H v' N O Ln M m M O M O M O H M M (n u to N r O m m Cn O O CDH CDm O N CDul O O d' O N H N r N N r- r H � a r-1 N £ N < 0 £ O N rl N to m H to H to O H r H m H M �tl M L1 lD m to Ln M r v' Ol OJ H a F:C O N O H O M 01 > m > m > m > m > m > m a m r H O O r d m N N m a O O 1n m v O lD F z W E+ Z W E+ Z W E+ Z W E Z W F W H H H H H H H o U z W W W W W W ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O Q U U c� c7 a a a FC FC a a w a < Z Z FC Z FC Z < Z FC Z a E E m m E m E m E m H m F m< FC m< ElFC FC W Z O H El£ O El Z £ £ £ £ H H ❑❑❑❑❑ H H H H Q❑ H H O El LL H O ElZ H w E+ O El Z £ CD F+ O El E-H o El U H E a, a U z U z U z U z U z U z£££££££ a a a a a a a a H x a CU � a £ a a m m m m m p > H a 0 ❑ W O W n W D W D W m w- a H H - H H H 0 ❑ U) a O ❑ £ O Q El U ❑ W C7 O ❑ W H W H w H W H W z H p m z w a H a H a H a H 0 H Ot H a a < < a FCC a < a < a a < z w W W z W >,H PQ z w w 17 z w < W z w a a a al a a4 a a a a4 W ❑ > 14 w 11 w 11 w 11 w .a w .4 w U V o 0 U 0 U 0 U 0 U 0 U o > £ w > say > O a > H > a o (.l 0 a4 0 a, m a+ n w W ❑❑❑ Q❑❑ a a a a a a a £ u a £ m m m m m U w H ❑ p a W H C) O o r r-1 H m Co O 110 �o r ul 1- > z H ❑ > z H P7 £ 5 N N to N N N N t9 N N to N N O N N O to to M M �o M to M to M �o M to M M O N J) O I H m r m N N H ❑ H x Z N N N N ul N N N N t-n N Ln N N N Ln N Ln N 1n N Ln N O N v' M O N to H to H to H to H l0 H a z a4 w w m a I o 0 w E a w W O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N v' 1n O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 r1 r-1 m O O O z, r ID N r to N r to N r to N r 10 N r 10 N r r to to N N r �o N r to N r to N r �D N r to N m In O c`1 O H H O r H O [r H O Ir M O r H O r E 7. a O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 r-I O N o H Ln H 0 N O H 1n H 0 N 0 N 0 O U O O O O O O O O O O O O O H 'T N H M N 1n H U a' O f-1 r u7 H r O N r Ln N r O M r Ln M r O ul r-I H r r O N r ul N r O M r 1n M r O - r O H O H O H O ,-+ O H O H O H O Ln O H E U Z U Z U Z U Z U Z U Z U U Z 2 U Z U Z U Z U Z U z H EH m 0 U M > a > a > a > a > a > a > > a a > a > a > a > a > a m Z H 2 H O O w m w m w m w m w m w m w w m m w m w m w m w m w m w H a E u 0 U U U U U n W < Hl < Hl Hl Hl < a H1 < '-7 r7 < `-7 < 1-7 < 1-1 a Hl < 1-1 < E H U Q U < m m a' Z H z H z H z H z H 1 FC H U Z H U Z H U Z H U 2 H U 2 H U 2 H H U U 2 z H U z H U z H U z H U z H U z W a 1. D z w E O a, F O a, E O w E 0 a4 E O as W E `-1 z r-C z < Z FC Z FC Z < Z FC Z FC < Z Z < Z < z < z < z < Z U < < £ z O O H W Q W Q W Q W ❑ W Q W H < O Y� a H W H W H W H W H W H W H F-1 W w H W H W H w H W H W W 14 z O m a W W H Z W U W U W U W U W U FC LU rL Hl a O Q H Z Q H Z a H Z a H z O H z O H Z O H H Z z O O H Z O H z a H z O H z O H z a a E < E 3 W x U H H [N W H W w H W w H w w H [u W U) E W z w £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ z z z a o O o 0 0 z 0 p }i > 0 H CD 0 H O 0 H O 0 H O 0 H O 0 H O 0 0 H H O O 0 H O 0 H O 0 H CD 0 H O 0 H O M N O 0 1n N .-+ O H O O M un O O w Ln O CD w 1n O CD w un O O w 1n O ry CD W U H p H z a z o z o z a z a z 0 z z 0 0 z 5 z 0 z 0 z 0 z z El Ft 3 w U H W H w w w w I� w ' < U £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ z z z z O O O O 0 0014 z H r N M m m CD Ln d' H l9 < LnN u-) N N Ln Ln to to N '- n N l0 a o N O E+ z O O \ r x U N m N m m N N N m 61 m m N m O W r� F p7 O El O F O H O H O F O F+ O H O F N F O H N F O F O H N F a a m N El z H rn M �o o O r l0 o N H O o m m � o N rn m Ln H Ln N o O 0 CD W £ z q v' M l0 N N v H in(3) H m N Ln CD M Ol Ln H H I N ill CD >, Q m m M m r a r rn M o r m o rn O O N Cl) to l0 M to l0 N O N C' H to Ln m Ol Q' Ln Ln ,`Z W O M 0l N M N l0 cv) ry r M C4 m H r W z N F H H a z 0 El El I- El El El El 0� El El > EC z O F O F O I+ F O F O F O U >> U F O F O O U F O z O H O F O U) F O W H F F W H cZ F a4 F co co F F F H F H '4 F D: H O > CL H a 0L O ❑ a' 0 ❑ O x C4 O ❑ O U o fZ O q W 0 W a m O ❑ F U F U fZ O ❑ n CZ 0 a O ❑ EH z H fZ O 0 a4 H 1x cZ O ❑ to W H co W H a O ❑ W x U cZ O ❑ FE U � z Q z z w z Z z < w z � � z w z ❑ z U z a a z z x H U) W W > z C7 W > H W > F co W > W a > Ftr W > F z F z W > a. W > OI W > m QQ W > a W a, LL w > z < w > F co cn ❑ H U) w a z H H a F O U O U H < fC a ❑ co ❑❑ co co a a z H w w U w d H ❑ a: d' cn to O 0 > I > W fA O r M Ln m m N O r-1 N N N Z H ❑ z H Y, O m N O N O r rl v' N to O M N M N N r H q z O N O F O F N O m (n M O O d' H x FC z a < w w w a i o o w F Cr O O N O O d' - m o O O O r N W O o rn o o M M O o 0 0 0 Ln rn m o O n o o Ln Ln m o O o o Ln Ln z un O Ln M m O d' M Ln O O M O Ln O in M O M O rn O rn O r o �o �o n Ln r o o r r o 0 H z r M N N N H H M v' N M M N N a Q 1) M Ln rl o N 0 H o r-1 O d' o 4' Ln H m to O H N �) N Ln �' o N U (J � rl CD H O H CD H O H O H O H O CD O rl O ri O H O H O H O H O a z w O �I+ U U a UCD < a M z H z H W O O z O C7 H o �n co z a a < a H Z H a a a m H x a a s s w z w z a a x m >. a N W, w z x U) z LYi z w w z z U w H w w I < c7 H w iL 3 Q 3 Q 0 co 0 co z H co O a in U 0 U 0 U H w F n F a4 a a s E. a a a s a w a z a F w w z a 0 0 w F m H < O %. 0 ❑ H a x x FC as IL H a (o co z co U) 1 F O r a < a 0 a a 0 a 0 x w a w a H x < a x w x u, K� a a a< a 0 ❑ < z o w Q w w m w 3 O 3 O w x a a H ❑ a < ,a 4 cn C a x U) F w z w a a z ❑❑ as w F w o a s w u z 0 > M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Ln O 0 O O H o O H N O N O O M O M N O O H O ri Ln O Ln O N O M O O F U H a rL a 41 E. H 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 O H fZ H a s < co co 1:4 w w a a a, a a, a a 0015 2 N Ln M M a' Ln �o r m m r CD r-i N M d' to �D r m M O N m �o to ID �o �o �o v) r r r r r r r r r r m a o H z N O O r x U N CD N N N N N N N N m N N N N N N N N N N N p W F O O O O O O O O O O N p O O O O O O O O o O C7 < r r r r r r r r r r ID r r r r r r r r r r r r� W H E F H P F H H H F F F E H H F E E H H F E a w Ln O O O N m m O O lD lD o N O cn O (D Ln v7 r r N ElO m O N .-1 Ol m r1 C' N r CDw m H O m Ol m N r r M M rl 2 W F 2 m in � m �D N Ol M r m O O cn Ol v' NM M . Q1 O) E 5 r lo N N c) O N v' .-1 ID tf) M N N r r M M }i O m M O M N N M Ol N N H r r Ln Ln M lD .-1 lf7 .-I O lf) N o O o O p O O O m O M r o m n Ln W W m O r z z o M r to a > > a r C4 M H H Da m O v0' rM-1 U C4 a U M a, LL zCD N rL 23 a ou a H H n > a a a U m z u) w w a u) H H 3 3 3$ H H Cj U O >+ cn ro GQ >1 u) u) cn m O O O O O to m O O a H a O a Z a H (L W CO H H (L a f:� a CG m a a a a a >+ » a a < H < () < W < H H O O O H H < CL < `J a w W W 14 w a a D, W z E < H w H E H U> a a ❑ U H - H cn t/] < o O H O rt+ O a O � � � � � � O w O x x x x x z z 0 0 W H H H E a H W El >+ » >� >� >1 >+ >+ E N F+ H H M W M u) M FC FC 2 z O F U x H E H H H F F+ F O CL H f4 o (.D fx O m M c' o u) o' o o ❑❑ a a o a o❑❑ o O 5 Q z FL o a z o W E W E--�� U U U U U U H U H u) u) m w > rx ❑ z o m❑ a❑ ❑ ❑ M M F F H E H E E O O z U 2 H z N 2 < 2 FC FC FC FC FC FC Z ❑ 2 m m W W w w W O O x x Hu) W x W � w E W a cx c4 fx cx oz w z w W w o o o o o z z W > CL' > > H> H H H H H E H> r� cn u) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O O 3 3 ❑ FC W 2 x x x X x x >C C4 M M a O O O O U U W G] U) CL u) < W W W W W W W U` FC FC W m fQ Ql W W W 2 2 W Cu U W N N O N N N N N O N N N N N N N N N N N H ❑ z o o O O o O o o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O w CD CDN O O O O O (N O CD CD O CD CD CD (D O CD CDO > I > m N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N H Q H a >+ >>1 ?i ]4 �l ?i ❑ H z 2 �D E h O H x 2 4 a C1r� w w w rx O O w E (1' O O m in Ln m m m to Ln N O O O O O O O O O O O w O O m r r r r r r r N O p O O O O O O O O O W o O N if) to ul Ln m O O O O O O O O O O o E a mO) Dl 01 Ol D> Ol 6) LnC) M M M M M M M M M 2 cD O o' O (D CD CD O CDC) O CD O O CD CD CDC) O O O O O O O E 2 H r-1 M rl H ri H r-I H .-1 M M w N M Ln ID N N Ln M lD D Ln O Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O p O O O O O O O M r-1 M M M M M M M M .-1 Ol Ol Ol Q\ O1 6) Ol O) Q1 Ol Ol U U In w un Ln to 1D in N lD Ln W O o O O O O O O O O O O v' O C O O CD P a rx o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O x H H H H H H H a H H ❑ o o❑ o❑ o a a w w a CL w a, a, as tL H H a 2 2 z z 2 z z D w❑ z z a a 0 0 0 m z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w a x x a a a a a z a a M U O w w w w w w w O (Y. >+ >+ H H H H H H H U x x x x Ln O E H a a Ck a a z Cx a W W W W w w W W W w W C), F 2 z W W W W W W W a U U U U U U U U U U U Cl O O (n Vi U1 Cn (n Ui Ul 0 > > > > > > > > > > > I D U U 2 W W W W W W W W W W W < > > > > > > > H a4 a a, a, a a, cL n, al a. cL W F W W H H H E H E H H a z z 2 2 z 2 z z W 07 H H H H a a❑ a❑ a a x 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 r.0 D 2 m cn O O O O O O O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 » a U a a U U U U U U U z z z z z z z z z z 2 FC CY. W W W W W W W W W W W W W w < O > > > > > > > > > > m m m m m m m u) cn u> cn a ❑ H H H H H H H H H H E O O O O O O O O O O O u) z x a a Cr rx 0x a s cz cz a Ix a a Z a Z Z a a a Ix H W W z 0 > o o ,-+ ,-i .-+ H .-1 0 CD CD 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 D N N m O O O O O O O O rl H ri rl ri rl r-I H ri .-I rl O >+ cD O O .-I .-/ .-1 r-1 H f-1 H H O O O O O O O O O O O U E > > > > > > > > > > E M m m M m m m m m w w U O p O O O O O O O O O a U a a a a a a a a a Iz a rx r4 cr a a a cz rz cz cz a 2 2 0016 z H N m �.o m a' Ln l0 r m 1-- 0)CDH <m m if) N m m m m m N m 2Z O H z N O O N \ r x U N N m m N N N N N (D N m m O W H CD CD N cD O N O O O O O O O N N U FQ r r l0 I-l0 r r r r r r r ED l0 � rL W H H F H H H H F H F F H H F a a m Ln Ln Ln o o r o r r .-+ Ln N M o N H m H O O N d) M ul m O m H z w H z N r O 01 O r Lf) r w Ls-) r a m N m O l0 N r lD Ln N � a N O O r O r H m Ln N w O O N Ln M r1 O W W r o cn o� o r un F > > r N H o1 O 10 H N N H O O M - u) .-I H Ln m z a' O u) N U a a M f4 H H z \ H � z z E 0 0 a a a s a a a s a (N 1 U � < < \ < < m z z z H E+ z H H U H H H H H Q H a H 0 H H O O 0 0 O > 0 o a 0 0 0 < 0 W H x :E� H Q: H H E-H H O H H H E+ H H H El > W H W < < as O 0z 0: u) P: Pi a. V) [Z as a. a. x u) (f) 0" 3 3 O U O o W O w o W O z O O u) o C4 O w w > 01 \ \ Q m Q E, Q H Q H Q H Q H Q Q Q Q H H z U z c4 z u) z a z o z a z o z U) U) z z z o z a s H co w w w H w H w a w a, w a w a w z z w H w w w a s w a a> u) > U> a> E> a> > U U> E> Q> a s Q H H z w 0 D < H H o H a ED u) H cr U) U u) a U) U) < > U) V) w w U W N N M O H Q c4 O O Lf) w to O p 41 O O d' m <i' N N > > 0.l N N r v' O M M M O m l0 z z �o o o N I m O r r u) H z < < m N N M .-1 V' v' H z O O m o > H m m U rD o O H x FC z W 0 1 I O O w H O O N O O .-I un O M r O O O O c4 W O O Ln O O O H O M N O O O O W O O L('7 O O �O m O m m O O O O o r N r M M N M M r M M M z m Qlo o M CD o O O O O �O O O O F z N N N cljLn N M M O N M M C) O O o O O Lf) O O Ln �n O O Ln N 0 � m N H clj N ul m M r d' a' O N N N U U lD Qo H r1 H N H r1 H H O d' O O O O O O O O O M O O O U a a z D a H U U c4 c4 z H H M U U U) U) H >+ >+ 0o H H x xcr a a w w 1i 2 a U U O S O z < FC < F a E+ cz U U E >> H W FC W C7 H H E 1 W W O u) z z fx a EH O O < a (14 H H w z Qa O U U w H cf) u) U x w H a r-C r-C a a z m F+ m w CA W W E+ H (p H 3 3 < w W u) W x Q a o� z 00 w a 3 w F z z z K�< r a z z cn a H x a m -- < o Ex G4 F a m (n Cq W a O u) u) U H < Z 3 a s Q a s a Q O o 0 x E o H 0 0 H a< m z ox r4 a u) u) m u) E H H D > a 3 F w w z 0 > O O O H O r O M O O O O O O O LI) H o in O H H O Ln H H p> O o o 0 o O (D o 0 o 0 o r U H U) u) H H '4 o < w a O s O m u) in a 1-10 U H FC U O cz O cx U u) u) n O u) EH u) F n H H a > 3 3 0017 z N Ln O M N � r Q7 l0 N Ol to lD m of N N N a 0 F z N O c, O M r x U O C N mNNm oom O [.r.7 ElN O ID N N O O O o O r-� Eo r r Eo �o r r r r r � < al F H H H F F H F F F a a co Ln r O N r o r r N O ui N F Ln o r O rl z w El z o 0 o r v rn O c a rn o �o rn O Ln O N 0 d O m a O O N r N n v o r �o r rl u O o c r O m N N N r in N N W Ln > > < < 0 < z F H F F E1 W W W F u) u) F O O H O O O cn u) u) O O W H H < EH ElCL El < Elx x El a w w H a n a a s a o a a s s rx o ff w o O O o p o o x x o > c4 -❑ a❑ o 0 o x z x o U o o z U a z u) z n z x z w w Wx w z z "u) a, W z w w w F w H H w H w z z W �a > 0 0> a a> 0 0> a> z> 0 0 cn u) El EH H U V F U a a w w V w N O N H p cz mN cN N N p W N f r r aN N c) > I > W (N N CD O M M \D N O O z z E r rn O H ❑ H O Ir H o m m m m o m I H z O Nm W CO N N ❑ O M m Ol O O .-1 O CD O O H x 0 z a � w W w a I o O w H a. O O m N d' T N <I' r r w o o v rn o 0 0 o r v 0.l O O 10 Ln l0 to m ID in to E ❑ M m m cy)m0 M z o H cD o CD o C) O O o 0 cD 0) r F z N M N M M M m v a O ul O O v7 Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O N N N .-I - - - M M U r-C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln z w w p U U H E- H > H > a a a H W W ri u) m O o H a z z z z C7 7 o H cr) p p O o z z Ln z z W H H H H H H a F F W W u) a F o C o `oo o a o`o z z F� U F H 0 a a a a H H w H u) F O rz cz cz r4 U U 14z F < 3 O O O O z z p7 H 0: O z U U U U W w U O H N a F x x x x (7 0 < (z F u) al O O O O z z a r.0 o a u) z oQ cz Dz cz Z o n a o < w H w w w w w o 0 co z 3 3 3 ❑ x x x x »» F w W z p > o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D r o H o H H r o 0 O >. o o O rl 0 0 0 o - - U H �-7 u) z O [z zcz cz o 0 U H r.� W H O W W w w O O + >, ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 08:48AM 07/08/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 50147 07/08/02 ATT075 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 57.73 50148 07/08/02 COA080 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 14955.07 50149 07/08/02 COV065 COVERED JC 3000.00 50150 07/08/02 DEP008 DEPT OF CONSERVATION 3863.34 50151 07/08/02 IMP010 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 13254.29 50152 07/08/02 KUS100 KUSTOM IMPRINTS 452.59 50153 07/08/02 LAQ050 LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES 641.03 50154 07/08/02 RIV040 RIVERSIDE CNTY DEPT CHILD 426.50 50155 07/08/02 SOU010 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO 563.31 50156 07/08/02 SPRO10 SPRINT 859.29 50157 07/08/02 STA044 DARREN STANLEY 62.50 50158 07/08/02 UN1005 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 179.00 50159 07/08/02 VER200 VERIZON 3346.78 CHECK TOTAL 41,661.43 0019 M - m - �n l0 r m 0l O H N m H Y' H N (x O N N N N - H H N O F z m O r H o W U F 007 E C7 C7 £ C7 C7 £ U` £ C7 £ U E 0 E C7 U' £ 0 E 0 0 £ 0 E 0 C7 rn rn m U a 0 FC (A W F W F W F W F W F W H W F W H W E+ W F W H W F W F W H W F W F W F W F rn F rn F m m CD H `!. H M r Ln m v' H O H O N m N O O l0 m m d' <f' m 0) m Ol O Ol Ln N M O H CD Ln W z 5 r LO O r Q\ m O �0 O O l0 l0 m O Ol N M N l0 Ln N M r in O r O Ln Q N T >� p m M m l0 O m O d' N I H m �o H N M m N N a' a M H r O M Ol M r r O O O O M M l0 N v' Ln Ln N Ln O ❑ O .-1 ❑ v' �n ,n Ol O m > C m M m FZC H a I U w x m U m < < a z < Cl z O O x F O F z O W F O F O>>>>>> U U U U U U U U F In O E+ F O a I F O I W H a F El ❑ E+ Elm m m m m m m m F a' El ElH El a, m (k > > > > > DL 3 f� w W w' U U U U U U U U a x t r " a � O > H C4 Un W O Un ❑ m m Un m O ❑ N O w ❑ w w w O ❑ H a' H 04 H C4 H 0.'i H (Z H a H a' H C4 0 m ❑ O ❑ m r1 0 Un ❑ rl z U a z a a a a a z Ln z z El El El El El F z w z ❑ z ❑ H m w w w w W w W w W w a > H o. H> W U W U W U W U W U W U W U W U w> w w FC W > a> w fx W ❑ fZ > F F El El F> > ££ a a a a a a a a F \ a \ a m 3 3 3 g 3 3 m m w w w w w w w w m w w U W 1 ❑ p .(4 fk M �o r m O m O m O m O m O O I m m O m O m O m D m z m O m n m D > > w a' 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O z H ❑ H z H O z N M H < H < H a' H cl,< H a' N H FC H < H < H < H < H < H < H < r N H ❑ m > > > > > N > > > > > > > > H x < z a < W W a O O w F p: O CO O O O O N m m l0 "n M In O O N I--O O O O Ol H N M M d' l0 Ln �0 l0 �0 O O O O O CD(p 0 �o 0 0 � � W Ln o m o o �0 �o w �o �o o 0 M H z M tD M l0 m �0 m �0 M m M to O lD - N Ol m C r N l0 r N 1D r N r N to r N m r N l0 r N l0 r N to M O r N N N N F z m r M O O H m m O O O O O un H Ln M Ln N Ln Ln Ol l0 O O O O O m Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln In tf) O O O U U f-1 f-1 H H ,-1 rl H rl r-I H f-1 H - r-1 H - H H H H < O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O H F F H E+ F p H m ❑ a m w (x W a' W c4 w a W (x w H ❑❑❑❑❑❑ H H H H H H co H ❑ w o x U IU-I O O z Z z z z z z z a F m > 3 3 3 3 3 H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 H 0 H a x a W p O Ln m w w W W w F << > F > H F FC H F < H F FC H H < H F FC F FC F FC F < m W ❑ a a a a a a rx (4 U 0 H 0 H H H H 0 H F z N E+ >4 E+ m (n a 4t a a Q,' a a W m w (n H z H C� z a QY z a a H H z I W > > > > > Z z cx (Z a a 04 a C4 C4 (Z a U U W H a z a x a a a a a U 0 U O U H a H a H a H a H a H a F-1 a H a x H < F W ❑ CQ H H a a a a a ❑ w w < < < < H < H x 7- H m a x x x x x a 0 O H (z H Z H a H Z H a H x a Z 0 o z FC a 0. O E+ U E+ a, F a W a W a w a, W a W a, W a W a, W a E+ m O+ W > a m ❑ z E+ O U O U O U O U O U O U W ❑ W ❑ £ H H £ H H H H E H H x a H CG E-H w z O W > r CD m O m o m 0 w 0 m Ln �o m O m O CD H O H o H 0 ,-i 0 H 0 H 0 H 0 f-1 0 O 0 Ln 0 SYYT''ttt p >, O F o F 0 < 0 < 0 < 0 < 0 < O > O a O s o a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a o a, H m O a H U H <(-) H < O U O U O U O U O U O U W ❑ W ❑ x H x H n H x H x H x H x H x H D 0020 z un a) o M �r �o r m 4 f-I rl N .-i •--I H rx O H z N O c) O \ N x o G] H E 0) rn x C7 FC W W W o) m W W W a p� H H H H H H El H O M rl Ol O O O N Ql f Ln o o� u� CD z W F z M r N N N N . a\ O to Ol to to r M ("j co Y O un r N aM o rn o O oo n M N m O r 0 M 0) < N N �o Ln H �o r c v' Ln (n U) H M Yi M I � x H W z H w o 0 0 W 0 H 0 H 0 H 0 H El H z H ">>" a >> Ix 41 a 4J a rr O H O U O u) u) O ro O In O H O M O z U z u] z W W z ❑ z ❑ z o w W z H cn W w z z W W w H z z W W❑ > > O O > D. > !x > O O u) a CD a a, a a H a a w w U w L m c H q c� o � Ln rn a r m p W Ln H M N N I P] N N ri O rl H z z m r O m M 01 H ❑ H .7 to M H z N co q o m H r Ln Ln H x < z a w w w x I o O Cu H [Yi O O O O O N O O W O O O O o M O O p7 0 0 0 0 0 �o 0 0 E m u) (n Ln n n z N M M N N M M M to l0 1D N H z r M M O O v' M M ❑ �n �n O o � Lc) � �n p m M H .-+ o o m H r+ O O H H H H H H H H F� O O O O O O O O H H H H H H H H H a W O u) U W q M U) O W O C7 u x Ln H a w H w w a a o z H w H < 7 z z 3 KCo w H H z ❑ 0 0 0 >+ a x z z W w N N N a< cr 0 0 a s a H a a a a cn z u) a coQ w >>> H W w z p > o 0 o Ln p o 0 M - v O o 0 0 o H w w w ff o w w z 027 0021 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 10:54AM 06/28/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 50075 06/28/02 ABE001 JACQUES ABELS 150.00 50076 06/28/02 ATT075 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 108.07 50077 06/28/02 BAX100 DAN BAXLEY 50.00 50078 06/28/02 BER150 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC 13050.00 50079 06/28/02 BOB100 BILL BOBBITT 50.00 50080 06/28/02 BOU100 MICHELE BOUDREAU 50.00 50081 06/28/02 BUT010 RICHARD BUTLER 150.00 50082 06/28/02 CAP025 CAPITAL REALTY ANALYSTS 5000.00 50083 06/28/02 CAR300 CARQUEST 343.12 50084 06/28/02 COA080 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 91.34 50085 06/28/02 COS050 COSTCO BUSINESS DELIVERY 1111.30 50086 06/28/02 CUN100 DENNIS CUNNINGHAM 50.00 50087 06/28/02 CVA010 C V A G 60.00 50088 06/28/02 DAV010 MIKE DAVIS 50.00 50089 06/28/02 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC 904.80 50090 06/28/02 EXP200 EXPRESS DETAIL 415.00 50091 06/28/02 FED010 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 540.96 50092 06/28/02 FIL100 GIA FILICE 50.00 50093 06/28/02 GUM050 BRAD GUMMER 161.00 50094 06/28/02 HAR030 TOM HARTUNG 57.85 50095 06/28/02 HOA010 HUGH HOARD INC 468.31 50096 06/28/02 IMPO10 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 9402.77 50097 06/28/02 IMP012 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 4537.00 50098 06/28/02 INT018 INTERNATIONAL PERSONNEL 299.00 50099 06/28/02 IRWO20 BARBARA IRWIN 50.00 50100 06/28/02 JAC160 JACOBS EXCAVATON/TRUCKING 375.00 50101 06/28/02 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 30523.55 50102 06/28/02 KIR010 TOM KIRK 150.00 50103 06/28/02 KIR050 RICHARD KIRKLAND 67.60 50104 06/28/02 KRI100 BRUCE KRIBBS CONSTRUCTION 5172.00 50105 06/28/02 KUS050 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 105.90 50106 06/28/02 LOU100 ELSE LOUDON 50.00 50107 06/28/02 MAH100 CYRILLE P MAHFOUD 50.00 50108 06/28/02 MAR020 DIANE MARTIN 275.05 50109 06/28/02 MOU050 LESLIE MOURIQUAND HUDSON 50.00 50110 06/28/02 MOU100 DONALD J MOULIN 50.00 50111 06/28/02 MUN010 MUNI FINANCIAL SERV INC 7850.00 50112 06/28/02 OFF006 OFFICE DEPOT 3.97 50113 06/28/02 OSB050 LEE M OSBORNE CPA 50.00 50114 06/28/02 PEN010 JOHN PENA 200.89 50115 06/28/02 PET005 CASH/PETTY CASH 188.03 50116 06/28/02 PET010 PETTY CASH/CITY LA QUINTA 350.72 50117 06/28/02 PIT010 PITNEY BOWES CREDIT CORP 1366.00 50118 06/28/02 REB050 JOAN REBICH 50.00 50119 06/28/02 REY050 ELAINE REYNOLDS 50.00 50120 06/28/02 RIV090 RIVERSIDE CNTY REGISTRAR 2580.00 50121 06/28/02 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS 564856.35 0022 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 10:54AM 06/28/02 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 2 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME PAYMENT AMOUNT 50122 06/28/02 ROB150 STEVE ROBBINS 150.00 50123 06/28/02 ROD100 MOISES RODARTE 407.76 50124 06/28/02 RUT050 RUTAN & TUCKER 134584.02 50125 06/28/02 SAF020 SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 4879.71 50126 06/28/02 SHA040 ROSITA SHAMIS 50.00 50127 06/28/02 SHA050 ARCHIE SHARP 50.00 50128 06/28/02 SIL050 SILVA'S RADIATOR & AIR 1133.90 50129 06/28/02 SMI150 MALCOLM SMITH MOTORSPORTS 579.59 50130 06/28/02 SOL010 SOLANO PRESS BOOKS 545.97 50131 06/28/02 SOU007 SOUTHWEST NETWORKS, INC 4171.53 50132 06/28/02 STA010 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT 87532.56 50133 06/28/02 STA045 STAN'S AUTO TECH 1244.03 50134 06/28/02 STA050 STAPLES 31.38 50135 06/28/02 SUS100 ERV SUSSMAN 375.40 50136 06/28/02 TER010 TERRA -CAL CONST INC 242727.00 50137 06/28/02 TER100 TERRA NOVA PLANNING & 4830.68 50138 06/28/02 TH0200 DAVID THOMS 50.00 50139 06/28/02 TOT200 TOT TURF 6488.52 50140 06/28/02 TYL050 ROBERT T TYLER 150.00 50141 06/28/02 UNIO02 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 62344.00 50142 06/28/02 USA100 USA INVESTORS II LLC/ 15400.04 50143 06/28/02 VER200 VERIZON 412.05 50144 06/28/02 WAL010 WAL MART COMMUNITY 101.77 50145 06/28/02 WAS008 WASTE MANAGEMENT -DESERT 1813597.29 50146 06/28/02 WR1050 ROBERT S WRIGHT 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 3,033,502.78 U2U 0023 z 61 M rl N Ol H r C r Ln m M N M o' Ln l0 N O c4 H 0 z m N CD w U` w M [-� FC m N l0 F N to 1-1 N to El N �O El N lO H N lD H N N l0 F w N l0 F r N kD H r N l0 H r N lO F r N l0 H r N l0 F H O rt H z H O O Q1 r m N O O O O O o O O CD O O O O N H M O O M a' M m CD M H w z O O H H r r o O N O o Lr) O un O Ln H O O Ln M r H O r O M O O O O O N d' M O o Ln H O O m O p to H H ❑ O O H Ln cn O W O O Ln O O Ln O O N H O O O (D H M M H 61 V x M ❑ LC) rx o w o. a �(n a U a cn < a a o < z a FC o a U < a E FC w a FC uF w a < a < z o E+ 00 W z W z FF H H O z o m DO H < a H O > H m O E El 00 W �. H o ❑ -0 H H O El W H H w U H a O a o a H < H a a x \ U E+ El x o a H E+ U El ElElul z ElU x >> U 4 o > ff c4 z O H O W W O rL o ❑ L4 O ✓ cn O W ❑ E+ Hz O ❑ H O z ❑ O z z O H ❑ z z co H < O ❑ z 4 m Q: O co ❑ z 04 cn O ❑ L4 z W H a z H U cn z z z W a H m a H m z D z W H 4] > a > H z z w x > U W > W > z W FC > z a+ W > D m W W H W w F > R, a+ cn W ❑ �C > a a O O z D U O U c4 < O U a w w < D cn << 3 3 D cn w w U W H ❑ a o o Lc) o O 0 o 0 O (D O H 0 ul r 0 O M o o M I N M O > I H❑ > H W m a N 2 m Ln lMo r In lfl N 2 �n N W z N W z N W z M O N I o l0 O r ID o r Ol O Ln H ❑ z D rJ r N r N a rJ Lo N r7 r] I'] O r O to o l0 Ln N H z < z a FC m w m a I o o w H o rn O O N (4 w 0 O 0 to o to O 0 o 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 Qo to o 0 0 o 0 m m o m io to io Ln 0 m 0 M 0 0 0 Ol 0 N m H H M H M M O z, O Ln M o M o o n O o O un O Ln O Lrn 61 o o to to r H z U O H o M �n H M in H H Ln N H Ln C H O d' .-� Ln N H O d' N CD 61 H O Lf) N O N N O N M Ln H U U a' O O O O o O O O Ln O O In O H O rl o H cn w cn w U z co m w w rz > M U >> U H a a < < 3 3 a 0 CD x w H D < w w n `n U7 a cn cn cn cn W x H w o4 L1 z W a H a a a << 1-1cn a W z w ElW w w w 1-1 x W Iz H H 0 D 0l 0 H < >> a co < D w w a s x < o m w a w ❑ a < a H Ela cn w D a w x s w x mz o U r a < w CL o D O U F w El m z c4 1,4 w a a H x U H x U H H a < a a n n o 0 0 0 0 �n o O o m O m o u� D U H U H O W m r H El r H El< O � Ln c4 w o m o o D o H a N < tz a o 0 0 0 _ 0 o < U FC << m m m m m U U U U U 0024 z \o r m m D\ O lD H N M V' Ln a O f-1 In rl ri rl H H N O F z m N \ N lD x U m r m r r r m r r r r r O W < F m N H N F N F N F N F N F+ N H N F N F N F N F N H � a M o ,-+ F z W F z 0 O O 0 o O 0 o O 0 m v' 0 o ul �D rn O o CDo O o H Ln m r H �n r o m O 0 lD M a in to Ln O H a' Ln to Ln (N 'T H �+ � O � ol Lr) r a FC 0 0 0 0 o O D O o Ln M H u) o o Ln O 0 1D U` O 0 Ln m O O Ln H D> o c4 < O 0 Ln O ID m Ln M tD H w ❑ c� z z F rn Ln o m Q F N O U W O z FC F z FC El W ElFH > F U F F z FC FC H FC F ❑ FC FC F FC F c z FEl U U FEl U w O H O F a \ O F u) U) O H O F > u7 O H H < 0 F O F F O H fZ O F H F O F >> u1 u] O H > u) H m cl. U C4 o4 E-H oZ ElG: a x fZ W Dx O a 14 W z O ❑ c4 U O H O ❑ G4 H O ❑ .] C O ❑ H z O ❑ U a O ❑ W a O CD ❑ H o ❑ x F O ❑ U o O ❑ x O ❑ z o z o O ❑ H a > z rz U z z O z 24 z U z z z u) z 0Z z x z U U z F H M w > x U> w w z> w z z> w El z> w H x> w a w> w w >> w H m> w U z> w x a> w U w v) w o a F.0 w C7 O U o U w > > O z H z H x a H FC H FC a W W w U W O O N O (3) H ❑ P: O O lD O M p > I > W m N N ,--i r in M in N W m rn m O LO C .H H❑ H H z z o 2 w v o H r cr N z o M r H Ln O o ❑ '7 I] N d' C 'D M M Ln H a' < z m r� m w m cr I o 0 o w F a O O O v' Q) O O N o O N O w m O o O 0 O o M un T ID O o O o D> Ln o o O o H �,D O o rn r rn Ln rn Ln rn rn r H r z O M l O o L I-o O L O M N �o N N FF z H N H a' H M r1 M Q O m O H in N Ln M O Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln if) M ul M U U FG O ri O rl O H O H O Ln O O o o O O O F u) H a a oM O O o U H H pa, < H a H u) W U U 0 H u FC a Z H H a W F Z z u) H x W W ❑ x W W U W z Ll a ❑ oz a z m H o C7 > FC H u) a H a z F a < o FC O a FC < 7 7+ a u) H < O H u) < H U (1 x x H < a, < o 7- z > Y+ m ❑ FC; =4 a cn ❑ z w ❑ U H z w ❑ x w w w m o Elx 0 0 x x H Elw z0 w > a (D (D n (D O o 0 0 0o a 3� m p i+ U F U H o r-1 z D .-1 O < > - O > F(; ID O u) W O N M x ri O ❑ W O H a H Ln O .x ZD M O a Fc r-1 O < O - o < O H (D m FC o U U ❑ ❑ w w w c� m x x H 0025 z l0 r Co N O M v' lD r m < H H H d' H N cl' N N Cz O H z N O m N \ M �o x V r r r m r r m m m m m m m r m r O W H N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U' < ID 10 ID �o O l0 1-0 l0 �o l0 �o �o �o l0 to H E+ F H H F H H F H H H E+ H H H � a M H r C) O O O H O1 r- cD H O O O O O O O H O O O O 01 N r O N O O O �O CD61 H Z z W H z 61 r O Lr) M N H H m O l0 O r N V) O m M m In M U) H Ln l0 r O >+ O d Lr) N M N r O m H r H H < H m to Ln O Ln co N a H r O O O O Ln O O O r o O o o �n o o N r CY) O W Ln z U' W M O r N O M m z In 0.: r H z H z > N NU) �O r v �n N O ❑ M ❑ O Z H< Ln m m W H H `.4 C4 H W F a O 'n ❑ H a m O H X Z a M cz ❑ < a H o a w H H ❑ V a a C4 U O< FC Z a H W U) z a a\ H W x U) O a a Z m >+ C4 a a m a W a 3 a a W 5 a a a \ a FC FC a < Cr rr O < `.4 0 Q ❑ H E m E, z U H W H W E+ a H m H a O<< m H H E H E+ z H H O > O C7 O m O O z 0 O a W H FC O O O O H O H W H U) H CY, H Y: El a EH H H 3 a z z Q H H U H H FC H x V E-F < < H O O W ❑ H a U a x x x u a zrz C4 Elm m H m W a a a a CD O H H O U O O H O O < a a H x O Z O W O U O z > a O$ ❑ ❑ a ❑ Cr Cl 0 Q O EH H O x ❑ H ❑ U ❑ z ❑ H Z U H Z Z z < z O z z z z z < Z H Z H H m U W W W a W H W "W m m W W to H W z W WW x W z a H H O U) ❑ a w W z < H O FC a❑❑ W W FC a Lz w FC Z a a E w W U W M o r O o H ❑ r O O O w l0 M M N (N > I > CQ d' x H r m r i0 Ln H O m m z z H 3k O W 0 Ln H .-1 r-1 O m N W l0 C H ❑ H O O a H z M ID lO Ln - z V Ln H Z O U) r O M Ln Ln in x N ❑ Ln U rn h c H H f-1 H H H .-+ h a H H x < Z a m w m I o 0 o W H p; O M O O CDO O W O in CD CDm Ol cr N N N N N M O O O m a) O Ln O O m Ln O O O Ln O r M in Ln Ln m r M z N CD O m M C) O O C, O O O O 0 O 0 O CD O O M O CD O Q0 0 H n r o o 0 0 0 o n o 0 0 H z N O H O N M M M mM O O cn M O o .-+ O o 0 0 0 o ur o LC) �n Ln o O N l0 O v' r Q' .-+ H H H H N C M V' M UH H H H O H .-I f-i H H r-I .-i < O O O O r O O O O O O O O O O O (N c� c� z H F z z z z z z z z O U) U) a H m m m m m m m H H H W x H H H H H H F H O ❑ z U H H H H H H V z W W W a z 2 O a W W W W M O O m H > > > > > > F U o H H !z \ O❑❑ Q❑❑❑ m z o H H w z FC < FC < < < FC ❑ z H Ln a El a a a a a a au (n H H a z < a a a a a a a a a a a FC H > I Cz Cz Z 3 < m U) m m m m m Cz m z O a' U ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ H W 0 W H H H x O O O O O O O a z a a H w O O O O O O O x a m CQ H FC < a a rz a m Cz a z cz Cz rz a x < w o a w W w m (D w w W w w w w x U H a a H a V z z z z z z z E V U) a O H H H H H H H O H C4 z m H m x x x x x x x EH tz m x E-F W W z 0 > o N m o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o O r-I H f-I N Q0 O O O O O O O Ln O » O O O O H H H H N H H H O O H O U H a a H 3 U z z z z Z z Z a a H m Cr H H H H H H H H H f4 FC U H H r7 r4 `.4 a4 x x 0026 z CDn Ln M N In a' M U7 <T N" Ln �o N r N m N m N O M H M N M M M v' M Ln M �o M r M m M M (DLn M d' a o E+ z N O m (N \ O W C) U x U F m N E ElF m N r N O H m N El H m N �o H r N H r N El El r N F, HP r N m r N El H r N P H r N El H r N El H r N p H r N H r N E, H r N ID F r N �o H r N �oO F r N F r r N N �oEl H F � a m O F+ O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O H z [,] H z D O E O Ln O U7 r N O if) O O Ln N O Ln N O Ln N O N O �) N O N N O1 N r O H N O U) r O n r O Ln r O Ln r O N r H Q' m I N m m r r W O O O O O 4 O O O O O n 0 H C7 z o n cz < O o Ln F z Ln r N z O o n z L 0 o n H 0 } o W a El w co Cl) W U " 0 > z H a rc z H O O H W W H O (Z q U z m w w > ❑ U U) E+ < a r�C f o H a> � U a < H O w' O q z W H > q < H z W E H U) w >> z H c0 a Fc H W O cL' z P' O O H q H z < W U ❑> ❑ W a E+ o 0Z O ❑ z w U) w cC W a H x a < H OH a O ❑ z W H > ❑ rc H z W x H U) W >> z H a U < > F O H W x fZ ❑ O U) ❑ O z a W U H ❑ U > U) W x D U)cn O a U H ❑ U > W cz D O a U H ❑ U > W a D cn O a U H q U > W a D U) O a U H ❑ U > W x D a7 O a U H ❑ U > U) W cz D cn O a U H q u > W rx D to O a U H ❑ U > W Z D u7 O a U H ❑ U > W cx ❑ U) O a U H ❑ U > U W a D U)U) O a U H ❑ U > U) w a D U) O a U H ❑ U > U7 W a D O a U H q o > U) W x D U) O a U H ❑ U > U) W a D cn O a U H ❑ U U > > U) V) W W a x D D co v7 O O a a U U H H ❑ ❑ W w U W H q a O 0 O 0 o 0 O 0 O I z H ❑ H ❑ z H WW ❑ z N W z D F) N W z D r] N W z r7 N W z D I7 r r N N r r N N r r N un N r r N N r r N �) N r r N Ln N r r N Ln N r r N Ln N r r N Lr) N r r N Ln N r r N un N r r N Ln N r r N Ln N r r N Ln N r r N Ln N r r r r N (N Ln n N N z a 4 FC W W P7 C� 1 O O w H 41 W (Y] CD O O CDfn O CD Ln Ln (D O O CD CD O CD CD O CD O O (D O O CD O CD CD O CD (D O CD CD O CD CD O CD O CD O O (D O O O O O O O CD (DO O CD O CD CD O CD O O z m o �n m o �n In to rn o to rn o Ln r �o N r W N r N r �O N r �O N rr N r 0 �o r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r �O r o r 0 ID r r o O to to H z D O Ln N Ln .'-� o H O d' Ln H O o O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 O 0 0 O - 0 M dw 0 M d' 0 M H 0 M H Lr) m H o 0) O 0 O 0 0) 0 d> 0 0 d> 0) U U H O .H O .--I O H H O H O H Ln M r O m r in N r O N r N H r O H r O M O M N O M H O M O H Cl) r-I O Cl) O - r .-1 O m N O M N O O M M 7- 0 W q x M o ❑ q ,on o z 0, w D H a z H o < O H a 2 41 w 1-1 z Q o 41 h o' a x z a w < O U) a rL Cl) z a a U) 2 w U CD H w W z 0 > 0 O O 0 O a O O N Ln O O >+ .-+ 0 a 0 U 'Hi O FC Z O O > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a x x a a a a a x a a cx rx a cz a z w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w u) U) u) cn u) cn O m cn cn cn cn u) cn cn cn cn a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U z z z 2 z z z 2 z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z Z z z z z z H H H H H H H H H H H H H 44 G. Fi D4 H w w w w w w w w w w w W w w H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 0 D a D D D D a D O D a D D D 0 0 O O o O o o O O O O 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 H H H-. H H H, H H H H H H .-+ H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z D a D 0 D a D 0 D D D D D D D D 0 ( /� 0027 N M d' Ln \D r m M o H N M Ln Ln In In ,n Ln In In �o a O H z N O m N � n x r r r r cr r r r r r r cr r r r r r r r D U r r r r N m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O W H N lD N ID N lD �D lD lD lD ED lD lD ID lD lD ED lD lD lD ID 1D \D lD ID tD < W H H El El El F H H H El H El FA H H H F H H H EH H F H EH � m H O O O r O m H a' H N N D1 - O O f-I M lD r r O O O CO O H O O O Ol O m ID Ol O O\ O ul ,n Q' H m O o a' N Z H m m o m o O H m ID .-1 In lD r In r m m m In M m o In In W £ z r r m �n O N N m m H r-1 N m Mtn N N r m }l O N < £ w FC O r O a m cD O O m O o ri a o o H H m H H H H E+ El H E+ H H El In < In o z Z m Z Z Z Z Z£££££ 2 m O N W W H W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W �. m a a s a a a a a a a a a a a � w w as m as w m m ro m m w m m as ro m w H £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ Q U U a H H H H H H H H H H H FC ❑ FC Z FC W W W W W W W FC W W W W W W W w w W w Z m m m H H < H H H a a a a a a a F a a a a a a a a a a a O O O O O O W W W W El ElEl H W F x x x x x x x F x x x x x x x x x x x U H a a a z W U7 U) m m m m m U) m m m m m w m m w v) H a. O a cn a w a £ a O H m cn m 0 41 0 £ 0 O U U U U U U U O U U U U U U U U U U U a 0 0 00 H❑ El a❑ ❑ z U 1- 1 4 z 11 z u) Z W Z >� >+ >+ >+ z >+ >+ » >+ >+ >+ » H cn U U U W a, W W W z W H H H H P H H W H H H H H F El E+ F H H W m m m> R, > > > z> F H F H F H H > H H H F F H H E+ H H F C] H H H 5 Z H W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W u) ❑ ❑ ❑ U) H ❑ a, a, W a, a, C4 W C4 a 0.4 C4 CL a, a, a, a, C4 0.4 w W U W N O H ❑ a r o 0 w O N M r r r m z z£ r r r m W H O H O N N N O Z H z Ln ,n In �D ❑ N N N H h H x FC Z a � m w as a 1 o 0 W H a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 r o O H 0 w O O O O O O O O o O O o o o 0 ID m O O iD O o H o al o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ID m o o �D o o m o £ 7 r r r .-+ m r r H H H m H M r H ,n m m r M m r m r 2 O o ID o o m M O o 0 0 0 0 m In m o o m �o o m o m lD to N r In ID r r r r r r r \D H Z r-t H O O n O O In In O Ln Ln O O O Ln In O in In In Ln In In In O O O Q m o� o r1 H H H H N N N N N N N N ci' n in U U O O r1 H H rl ri rl H H H rl rl H rl H H N N FCC H c) O a' O O O O cD O (D O O O O cD O O CD O O O O O O O O O O M M r .� H .-1 rl .-i rl .--1 H H H H H H H rl H f-i H H In In < < H H F H H H H H H H H U U U z Z Z Z z Z z 2 z z z Z 2 2 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H a a z a a a o a 0 a o a a a o a 0 a 5 0 a a m a a a r-C FC FC FC FC � FC FC FC FC FC O w w w a a a a a a a a a a a 0 n cn (n a n U x x x x x x x > » > > > » > > > > > a, u) m U7 u) u) u) U) E-1 H H H H E+ H H H E, H FC H H H H z U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U O a < Z z z a, O WE, FC FC FC W [0 < F H F H H H H cn cn Ul cn Ul cn v] w cn cn a 2 z z z ❑ n z H F H H H H H < < < < < < FC FC FC FC < cQ H H H H O W a] G] w W w W W U U U U U U U U U U U < o w w W w a a, a a, a, a, a w <a H H H H Z x x x x x x x H H H H H H H E, H H H a L O Z Z Z W W x cn cn F H H H H H H H H F a ❑ o 0 o W w o O O O to O O In in Ln In In In o 0 o O o O O o o O O 0 H H O In H 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 o H H H H H r p >, o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o O o 0 U E+ Z z z W W z H F H F H E+ E+ E+ El H H H E+ E+ H F H H U H O o 5 W co W W w W W W W W W W W W W W W w w w W N H Ln v� I H H N .-1 M r-1 a' H N H �o r-I r m o1 O H N N N M N C N �n N w N r N o d' r4 O F Z N 0 m N o O W U W x F < on N F N lD F N to H N �D F N to El m N 1D H m N �o El m N to m N lO H m N Io F m N l0 El m N to F m N to El m N to El m N lD F m N to F m N l0 H m N to FF m N lD F m N to H m N to F m N �O E-F M H O H O O O O O o O O N H �,D M O lD O o M CD O N N Ln r N r O to O O O �o N M O W N r O m O O .-� Z W is p4 F Z O O lD M H O o Lc) O m �fl N Ln - M M m H N r N M 41 H N ul H N M Ln m m M In r Ln N m N m N H O M N m M m N 01 r m H N m H M r M H N N N of n m M un Ln m M N O m �o Dl O w r H �,O Ln N H ID M to v' o N N r o O O O O o O O M O M o to M H U z F 0 N C7 z H o Ln CDun m Ln N Ln m N U m W U H O > z H z O H F a H CG U cn W ❑ FC F O H x o Q z W > W E+ m >+ w c3 z❑ H a H>> FC F O F a O z W O U U > m >. Fox H z❑ a O U O U < m F FIE, o a F < a Q z a W El a> o U FC O F oz O ❑ z Wu W U > oz W ME, z Q H❑ F w> a w rL F O oz O z W F z W W U r4 Q W W 3 FC a E+ z W W U rx O W W 3 FC a F z W W U cz Q r., W 3 FC a F z W W U rx O W W 3 a F z W W U Cr. Q c.w W 3 FC a H z w W U Cr O w W 3 FC a F z W W U o: o W W 3 a H z W W U Qx 0 W W 3 FC a H z W W U ox Q W W 3 FC a F z W w U r4 o W W 3 FC a F z W W U Dz Q w W 3 < a E+ z W W U rx O w W 3 FC a F z w W U o; Q W W 3 < a F z W W U Dz O aw W 3 < a H z W W U rz o W W 3 < a F Z W W U Cr o w W 3 < a W W W 0 Y. 0> o ro z F x a < x o U F u m z o H z W z a a o. w W U W H ❑ 0 > I H q H ❑ > H fz W W Z I m O N rn m O M o O N W z 5 t7 O O N W z O h r H N .-I CD rl Ol N H I N 0 CD H m N r I N O H m N H I N o o H m N H I N O O .-1 of N H I N O O H m N I N H O H m N H I N H CD H m N H I N O N to m N H I N O N to m N H I Cl O N to Q1 N H I N O N w m N I N O N \o m N H N O N to m N H I N o N w Ol N I N O N to 01 N H I N O Ln M N H I H O O O N W z O rJ H a' 0 z a rC w w w a O O w F (Y. w pa N o QD O o o O O 0 o o o a> Ln un m r Ln 4 Lo Ln O r Ln m Lo Ln ul LD Ln H r Ln N Lo Ln Ln u) Ln m r Ln of Lo Ln O r u-> N LD Ln m Lo Ln In ID un .-1 r Ln d' r un O O o z rn o ID rn 0 un rn O Ln n o rn 0 rn 0 lD rn 0 to rn 0 ID rn 0 to rn 0 �o rn 0 to rn 0 w rn 0 �o rn 0 w rn 0 �D rn 0 ID rn 0 �o m 0 to m 0 to rn 0 lD rn 0 lD rn 0 in E+ z M 0 Q irn H Ln N Ln N o N o M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M O M o m 0 cl) 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 0 0 U U < o o O o 0 .-+ 0 H 0 H 0 H o ,-+ O r-+ o H 0 H 0 ,-+ o H O H o 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m w m m m m m m m m w m w m m m a Q U a Oi F m W H a w W H a w F14 H a w w H a w w W H r4 w w w H cz w w w H rz w F14 w F-1 Cr w W 41 H a w w w H Z w W w H a w W G-i H o: w w w H o: w W Cv H Oz w W W H Oz w W W H Cr w w W H W w M F H H c7 x m x w x w x m x m x m x w x m x w x m x w x m x m x w x m x m x w o Ln W < I W H a z » a FC w z U m w O (A W z x H W z m ❑ a O z W a z H a N F z U W ❑ a W N El z ❑ O U W ❑ a W N» F z z O U W ❑ !z W F z O O U W ❑ O: W r F z O O U W ❑ a W r» F z a O U W ❑ a W F z z O Q W ❑ a W N F z z O u W ❑ z W r F z O O U W ❑ GY. W r H z z O o W ❑ P: W r> H z a O o W ❑ o: W F z z O U W ❑ a W r H z a O U W ❑ a W r El z O o W ❑ D: W N» F z Z O 0 W ❑ P: W F z a O 0 W ❑ o: W r F+ 2 a O o W ❑ f1 W r F z 5 O u W ❑ a W w z cQ W O W a FC a m 0 (] z F H 0 FC a > H > H > H > H > H > H > H > H > H > H > H > H H H H H H H w F E+ W z O 0 O >+ U E+ U H ,:� U W > o o F H o4 0 Ln 0 CO W a o Ln 0 >+ W a O m o > H a 0 o - > H a 0 0 H > H a 0 0 > H Iz 0 0 H > H z 0 0 H > H Dx 0 0 > H o: 0 0 > H a 0 0 > H cz 0 0 > H rz 0 0 > H cz 0 0 - > H Qx 0 0 > H a o 0 > H o: O 0 > H D; o 0 H > H cz 0 0 > H Qz 0 0 > H a 0 �n 0.l O rz f.)3pp 5 11 . z Ln to m N O M lD lD N in d' H r N m O fZ 0 N O F z p N r x U r co co r m co r r r r r N r N r N O W U < F FC Ib N F N F N ID E+ N lD H N N lD H N H N F N F N F N F N �D F �D F l0 F �D H r� a m O F ID r Ln N r r r O O 0 O o rn N 0 O r Ol m N B o O c O Z w F z r n m rn O o m m o n m M C) O m m O O r r u) m m M N H m Ol O � Ln co W y, H d' N 0 N r a O to r Ln N H O O O m r M o O �n W H Ir r O O d' O CO N �n r Q1 r cD z o O Ln U z o O � rn M ry u� m rn Ln N H H H £ H a m aEl o w w < F F z O h > a u) a v) s cn w co w u) X a H Ela W a z a O 0 a w w a a s H a H a q H z F O F U U < < F cZ F co H F a a < H EH < < H w a w a FC F < P. (D < F a W a W m W O 0 Q 0 >> o D O x 0 0 a 0 0 z 0 a 5 0 El a rz a < W H F W EF U) U) F u) z F < F a < H W cr F W a W a EH O H E+ F E+ u) U H H a rZ W c4 O W >+ 47 a' H O G: O a r�C c4 O U H 0: O W D: O U >+ U >+ C: O F < fZ O cL' W a O z W z w 0Z p > H O 0; ❑ W >, C) z z Q a Q a n U U ❑ U Q F Q £ F z U z O z fx a z < z z z 0 z U z f4 a z H z D z W W d H m W a a W > O EH O F W H > z G4 > F a W > F u) 4] H > x W > O F O F W > a 0.l W > a E W > W W cn 4> ❑ w F FC F < w Q a U H x w > 0 o E x a O U 0 << 0 w w U O N O O ❑ fx W N O O CD N O N N N cT co0 M > I z > z a x a H N w w p LnLn Ln n w H ❑ H H O z fx < z z Ol cD O H O I q < E ID 'DM O H x FC z a < a w m I o 0 0 W F Ix m O O 0 O o rn m m o 0 0 0 0 w rn u� o (D 0 0 O 0 o 0 o 0 lvoD r Ln r �) (D o (D 0 (Dp 0 0 (DW 0 Xin lD to lD Dl m 0) m (n f-i to M m in z in lD m rl m H M H O to o Ln r-1 "o O l0 O lD Ln lD Ln m m to m to \o to F z O O O H r-1 H rl H N N Ln 10 m O O O H O O O O O O Ln N O a' O Ln O O O O O O D1 U U N �D lD rl < O O O O O O O Ln O o O O O v' O u) F u) EH a 0 0 z z H a a H m a a w a O a O F F F o x cx o 0 o a w w w Ln w r4 cx a o ro 3 w a w < F w w < m < x x F 0 0 0 Dx x x W H a H F F u W a a a o x < < x E w z >>> W H O a H H Q x x ok u] cn fZ a F W W Q❑❑ W W H O U O U z < a x E+ z `.r a< a O ❑ H O F 5 E+ D W < u) 0 U r4 a H a << s O O F E+ F u) z a' a u) G: < u) u) u) u) u) u) F W z O W > O o O O O p O O O O r O O O O >a U F O r-i Q Ln O F in O F N O W d' O < In Ln a In H Ln H rl O a O O .7 - O f.G - O < H O , 1 ^Jl �'► < U H O z z < x x H 0 O F F F < O a Cr rx cn m co u) u) co m n u) u) u) 0030 "0 r N M m m r d' m 0) a O N M M r r N O F z N \ m Co x U r r r r m m m m m m r r O W V a El FC CO N F N �o E+ N E+ N El N �o EH N �o E+ N �o F N �o F N �Q E+ N F N �o F N �o F M H p F z F O O M O m M O Y' O O m �o O O N O O O O d' O � Q' Co W z O n m rn M r N M cn m o Ln m d' o O N i+ O H O .-i N in C4 l0 M m O N O m O N O O H V' N M Ln N H Ln M U) r r z O O H M U) m W O O in Ls, a Ln m m O CDa' Ln .-1 O d' M z H E O O O T r H O N H El C C) U U) w N a W Ln - v 0 w a U o El U H El < U W CQ z F H E+ W .] a w a .] w a F a .H-1 a i-] .-7 �-7 W a W z < F H H < EH FC F H FC F U F z < z F < < F a FC F 2: < F F W Fr; El a W FC E+ W o H O E+ CW W o. W 0 El o El(4 a 0 ElH U o Eli-7 Fc O a El\ 0 El a W o F O U O E+ a 0 E+ a o ElU H F a a a s a U) a z U) a" > a a F au a 3 O a C� a a < Cr F z a U > O > H a O 0 w 11 w a O W w H O O W O 0 U \ O Q 1? < O W ❑ F O L F O 2 z H O q U O 0 1.10 m U) z U z U U H z w 1-1 w z w 0 ca z w EH co z w a w z H w x z w >+ < z w z z z w < ra z w W w z w W z H U) w w > x x > a > H > z > z > U > a > > a > a > O co 0 w > w > o m a W O U w C7 a FC aw co a a w E+ C x a w w U w H 0 a O M O N o O 0 O N O > I z > W W d' N Un Ln �o O v' O N W cn N W �n N H 0 H H 5 z rn rn O x o z z a M z D r r r) Ln F h M h r H x Fc z a m w w a I o o w F (y, Q1 dl O O M O O O O O O N pj l0 too O O CDO O d) �n O O O O O CD O CD Ln O O M io Ol 0) f-1 M m Ln Ol H Ol r M H z H Co H l0 O r O r O �o O l0 O Ln N 10 O Ln O N m M F z H H H N m N H rl H co) Ln d' O O O Ln O in Ln H O N M l0 O v' O v N O d' O O O 0) Ln c U U F� O Ln O Ln O O O O O O O O O (D w H z a \ M U zCD C? O w U .-1 CD H H a U H H CL < w F W F Ul z < a a Cl) I O O O U a a o a O El El z FC p >+ Cl M - U) - W a z U) I 0 O F F a z z H O N a FC a o z z a < > a a a a H > F w m O H Fc H a a U) o z F U) F U) F U) a W w F w F < O O F O a z O w 5 w > F w z O w > Ln in O O O O O O O N O O O O El O F d' O FC d' CD FJ; ul O O H m H O a O H a O N O O N F Ln O a O O H O H O N a U H � U El U7 F M EC F U) o M w El w El x F o F El z O U) n 5 w t > 0031 2 to O N m M M m OD m m m w N N w m a' rx O H z N O N rn x Q m m r r r r r r r m O CD W H N N N N N N N N N N El El El Fl F a W F H H H H H H H H H M N r r o N o O H Q0 O> O z H CD m o Ln �+ 0 pa < ,n M Ln r m o O r N O N r r O O m Z Ln Ln O M 1-1 � H rl rl N N rl ri > O O o 0 0 0 z 1 1 W 0 0 .-� - o O cn a < a o FC 0 0 0 0 Cl .] 41 a FC rz < z H F x x x x x x H a H o O O < < < 0 0 w H F H H H H H H H H H W > > a. m a �• N N %'� (x U Q. 0" > cn a u) O ❑ 410 H ❑ r4 H a E-H x E+ a H 0z H rx O F O ❑ a ❑ z U W W z a z W W W W W W z O z H U7 z z w a [1 a a a a a a W F w W 0 0> a> 0 0 0 0 0 0> m> ❑ x x a. a (Z Pi C� (4 H v) a, a, cn a n4 a as a a x w w U w o H ❑ fZ T �Q 0 Q w �o rn r N > I > W \o O m z 2 M 0 r W H ❑ 1-1 O �n v� r z r Lo 0 q r Ln o 'D H x 04 z a < ro w 1 1 0 o W H (x O O M rl O O O O O CDN N O O N N N N O O R7 cn O N O O N N O O x D �n M M r-1 rl M M rl z M M O O O O lO l0 r N C d' N N G' Ln F z M M N O O O O O O O Ln ul Ln O O O O O O O Q rl .1 M O O O O O O u (_J < O O O O o O O o O O H a a a a a w w w w w w cn cn cn m O w w w w w w w M I I o O El F F H HP H H �n z z z z z z z z H a ❑ w w w w w w x w w w w w w H 0 3 0 < < < WE, ZZ7-zzz a £ Z E IQ 2 Z z Z X E El r FZC a a H H w F w EH w F w H w F w H a W O cz rz a M M M m M O P7 a ❑ W w o cn z >> 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 cx H f�4 W z O > o 0 o m m m m m m o p o 0 r1 O o 0 0 0 0 Ln Q }i N N O O O O O O O O U EH L4 lZ a m m m m m m 1-I U r-i W W FC FC FC FC < > 3 3 3 3 S 3 3 3 038 T4ht 4 aCwa" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE• Transmittal of Treasurer's Report dated May 31, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 0- STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Transmittal of Treasurer's Report dated May 31, 2002 for the City of La Quinta. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with California Government Code Section 53645 as amended 1 /1 /86; and is in conformity with City Code 3.08.010 to 3.08.070 Investment of Money and Funds. I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet next month's estimated expenditures. specyplly submi JdKn M. Falconer/ Finance Director Approved for Submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment 1 : Treasurer's Report, City of La Quinta 039 ATTACHMENT 1 c&y 4 XA Q" MEMORANDUM TO: La Quinta City Council FROM: John M. Falconer, Finance Director/Treasurer SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report for May 31, 2002 DATE: June 28, 2002 Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month ending May 31, 2002. The report is submitted to the City Council each month after a reconciliation of accounts is accomplished by the Finance Dept. The following table summarizes the changes in investment types for the month: Investment Beginning Purchased Notes Sold/Matured Other Endin Change Cash $197,910 $12,677,663 (1) $12,875,573 $12,677,663 LAIF $17,828,290 2,000,000 19,828,290 2,000,000 I. US Treasuries (2) $64,097,595 13,042,522 (51,161,000) 66,811 26,045,928 (38,051,667) US Gov't Agencies (2) $12,983,136 7,888,540 (8,000,000) 15,205 12,886,881 (96,255) Commercial Paper (2) $0 0 0 Mutual Funds $8,267,424 35,879,520 1 44,146,944 35,879,520 Total $103 374 355 $71 488 245 $59 161 000 $82 016 $115 783 616 $12 409 261 I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code; and is in conformity with the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the pools expenditure requirements for the next six months. the City of La Quinta used the Bureau of the Public Debt, U.S. Bank Monthly Statement and the Bank of New York Monthly Custodian Report to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. 6 �— An M. Falconbr nance Director/Treasurer 0 1i Date Footnote (1) The amount reported represents the net increase (decrease) of deposits and withdrawals from the previous month. (2) The amount reported in the other column represents the amortization of premium/discount for the month on US Treasury, Commercial Paper and Agency investments. 040 0 L 3 m o m m m m m m C m m C a CD w C O C O z C O z C O z C O z O z C O z O z at2 y 01� E c p L9 O O > c > c cL g d a T £. p p 9 LL '2 6 O U C y N m m C.0 O L° L° L' % E 0 m � E . T E m m m m 9 m > O N O N C a a N C a N N m V j v rC O m `m N l0 C C a C T C C C C C N Q m O m a_ N m a O O O O O O m> Q p O y O O oo - M M t C) N N wC C rO m diWWW C O OaLLO O� m m 5mmW 0om - w v w v m E _ v Q Cl)w ds i `m N a m Z U] ` r r M N m 2 O 00 o o o a 00 0 0 0 _0 r OOW OWO O N O � O O O N co O O co O O N ^ O M 0 m W V1 W EE y 00000 _ _ - a o (� N,X z �'i �wwwww y m j LL Q m O OD O ^ O O O r m 0 0 0 0 O C 00000 O O O O O O th r m N (0cq co ( V a Z y O O O o 0 0 0 e o J N O O 7 000000 O O O LL O -_ O N Y90 0 VHd 0 O O O O O 7 m O O C, O Q Q N ` 0 Cl) t[)cl d) d) W E a 1 '89 o 0 0 0 0 E o o o a LL'� m �EEEEE 00 Z M N Q� ww 64 H44 N m r ° N y � O C w m O m Tyq m 2 O E U Q O m m m E U< y m C 7Z_^ zLL a (n pC y J c C y y OaO C m y y LL y i p m n p tp yv O m m 0 amam C ° O > mUO U m °0 am LL 2aO m LL m'a'a cl Ol C o tC9ON 0)QZNLL dLm 3c 0 CD z mE�o0 cQ cr U. y '- °° Cl 5 uNEm°omdm� m d hoc c Yi m O O i � 45 h q m'W E CD o V m m C A m J U J m 0flzomc€m R c rn y EEa m m CD m m H E�LEzi��ii E cU� a c m QQ>mtEL°L°�L°L° U amo EmrnU m m L N fn (n mlm ExU(n U N .�. U °L LL m OC >m I H U c ' O. W Q O I F- o a o 0 m O com rnonm S �C€ � y y N m m m U Q � 0 c m a LL cr `o`Oom 4m (M c y W W W N N N > > > C C C QQQ /7 04.E F s g C q C oa000a .9 o o o o o o mmmmmm 0 v E d 88888 $ agag 0 0 0 E$ g� HhthN N O N W � LL a cS � a pp V y � N �yp m mm p� y my S ypO O� 8 0 E 0 3) Z Z z 3 N N N f N O N N F N� 81 � a E' > a ae ae ae oe ae ae �m p o .XK g gm g cc �aa m Z m Z 2 2 g rr;>; 88 C as �NN(n N(A 7 7 7 7 7 7 ii2298 N N q F E E E E E E F E_ g� OO0000 En,E, wa 10 �' H O O m m M c =c 000o~ ooi fo s ar NA »»»Vi Q'a U zzzzzz_ aE' up < ti o`o`00000 azLLLL� Au S YYx1. 1. 1.F J q o o N N FF^^'.a^^NNya mSaaa000n�� g��Sg$SSSSN� �i�tANNp� ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y? 01 V N W t0 � O iyp m W A J R a g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q Q a a Q Q Q Q Q Q Q d 2 0 Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Q c -- ^ ^ ^ —— -.-- -^ TiEr o5aaaaaaaaaa_a_ E E E E E E E E E E E -add dffiffivddffi N q g m 11N Na O Ioi la-0 .,a�SUS3USUSU4 raj n ❑ 0 0 O y 0 LL i m C c Y A c Y u c R m m m m m m m J COCow (a 0 w U) 10,65 W y 7N(/i7Vi7m7 iy��a��?7oa7o7o70= 2 u w Oa:,,¢ m K m O o E o U U ^ 0 L Q o) c U C @ _G LL @ C i_ Co > T Q 0) C Q 0) E C a� t_ _CC CL :3 O O Ci0>0 cu J C N o E Of M _T E > m UU)U2 Oo000 O O O O O L- Q Q O O O O O Q d z z 0 0 0 0 0 Z O O O O O ..Zj Ln .: L() M L w L4 Q Q M LO 00 - O Q Z Z OD 00 CA o0 M Z oR N M CO O r+ M N N N N N N N 00000 00000 Q Q N N N N N Q Z Z Z M O M O U) LO LO LO U') 00000 GCD OCAOMOON�t OOoLn000It04N Ln v O N co LO N m t` O O tl- 000 (V (O O � � q � coo er . d� CIZ cl C CNCM'IT 'IT ItNM. U Mn 0 N i 0 0 0 0 Y m Z Z N c (>U O Q C� CL (D CL a. N U) 7 N C p�f N N @ @ N 0) @ L O a Z(D aD 0 LL a) LL (D 0) C @ a L @ U @ y (D 4)CMA Z C V Ln @ CUMMM O OV 7 @ L L fn U) N @ @ C;)U cA U) o tl. Ln 0 0 0 — z " a @ZZZZZ q) CC) E E w a�i E N +-' od Q 7 7 3 E E C �_ O N O E O > >o� 9UW E 0 0o c y dY LE6Lo QQ(n(�fnCn(, O EZU—j-j»D»2�- 00000 000000 @ IL 0 0 0— 0 0 00000oo 0 0 0— 0 0 LLi Ln 4 co Ln C`'M 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 d R CN ON (NO N d' (D 0) O N N N N N N 000000 O O O O O O N N N N N N 0) O N O •- lf') In LO LO LO Ln O O O O O O CD O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0� 0 0 O V- 0 O O O O CD.` CL LO In Cl) U') Cl) N iR U Cl) 0 L D cl) i C N O) __ __ __ __ U to LL C CO m m m U) C Cc @ O O Z Z Q m 01 ui O O y O) N N dV fL 0) C� C 06 0) N 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 @ Ln C/j U) uj U 0 co E CD z U? CD 'O U- w UL CD 0) m @ m L Ln y () CD a) CM ate+ LO 7 C: CD 0) N N (n y .�. .0 @ Z Co Nmmmm v vU O Ln L L !n fn N N N 0) V) O C z z o o o o C C Z Z Z Z Z d y > Z y O, Ui Z C C +-' 7 7 3 °� Q to Ln U) CO`y `) E 3 p)— Co @ @ @ > > C U 0) > o o c HHHHCD0 > AU LQ�fn(nfnfn(nU) 5 Z U -1 >>>>>> 0 LO Lo Ln o r- MIt 00(O N O r- 00 — p O M 00 (D f` M"� N co Ln O—O)— I- w C: O O N 0 E 0)CD U @ 7 7��a E .4) N cm m 0 a Cn .2 IM..+ u C C .... E `gym @ v C)wEECLc N C 01 C N 0 o E .5 .N 0 G C 2 C W C > 'C = U C L O r-a.a-jD2 �4� §}c') ;R°� n,co ) � )KK; aCl) NU)Ao �k� e k coR 44 04 ! ®/ Se,mc /-\/cm $ I m 'n 10 \\}/\ - c ) k 2-Jo22-emst ]J0 k §]\$=){m kk�§}ƒ kf�) IL /7 c 7 7_]J ALLLLLLL�mm '52< E25 a , om a k� � aMOO 2 - *$gQ E J!ai_o«3_AB LL 3 -T . O v OM ON r00 OMM OO CD 0) U)(0 V NO r r Qf a (0 T Y 0) "I OltO"Op M OD 10 M ID O 0 O V M N r M T Vf �gN00 N a O (N A< O^ N (D (r n M OO r N D M ny N tM 0I V /M 0 u 0 N p � D 00 NVf 0 0i(NO LL N000 (V 10 N Q Ct 0) dN N O1: N tO N O O V O W Mn(o M N (D t 0 ^ O N V N n(D�OO a M r O N r V N M 00 N tl M M N r n n N N h n n O a 0 (�i LL j N N N N 0) M N N OrD O N T N N N O O O M (p Cz CD O O O N O N 7 n n r A N A r r Or ODNO LO M V 04 N � U) O� 0 �0_ N Cl 0 LL (LO 1) H N V M N N O N dNM O� to O COR O M O O OOD NOO Ir (O N n n N N < H m V OM d NOO n VjO O �Cp e-a; O O 11 O r a0 .0 O (0 MtDN O M 0 0) (D (n 1D�O (") NU. � O 10 O LL (0 N N0 Ylp N (00) V nODNMN 10 t0 O OC')<OOQ n7 <N r (� 01 e' O M 0) Cl) a V N n � O co coV 0 M.^ N M n0 O O O N p nYj LL Oro Cl) �MM YO) OO O ao iD M N O WNW (0000 r 10�0 (D r 0) N V (7OM D) V -r Oo0 w(N OO 1f) yN p(D ^ ry � L6 0(O O (p N 07t0 OOONN N 00 n M 01 Mn ID /`O') 'Q 1'O7 LL V ((pp A a CIS OI IOM _ r O (0 OD r jp�T c00 W �0 0) W On ��..�m Q00(0 NOOr (O (NOO V)vj nMnvO Nlh mv(O(ON N to M co N N n Vf N (D r MMMO O 0 cn coOo N(O m N .. O N < L N C C) y o m c L ~ N G O7 a N � m U d K yy C CiS A C C (c J m C C m 0• N C M d C R A a U t m a F r I = W Tn w m c V U C IL l�0 p d 5 ~ c a)D a 2 .� m °° O Z d x c c w w '° co c V A m' C N F N x 7 2 H y N— O7 W m O) t C dN .N Cy y C y 01 Q Lu m L d X N d L O) N O O L C m m Mt-(0 W(naOUor Z U W Z O Ul (O O N n f`O'). f0 0) Cl) 045 .1 G;8 x x x i2 N �x x bx x x x Xi 3 �9 i 'aa g »00000� g eg «ooaoo� gppy 78H� Q No H .��vmi-�umiN t� F� -gym a mgmggg t N NNNNfn 7 J777J N FFFFFF E EEEEE w 8 3 Z gyy3 2gZZ3 - �oo`oo`o� m mmm6l Ql g»0000000000� �5a��aaaaaaai A AAAAAAAAAA 5 N .> T» Y»» �NNd V1N4NdNd °ssussysus�F nx oo a o� 4�mA�mmgm;m�ms SaN00 OON mNmNm(/j N NJNViJ NJN7� 4 J7<77<J¢J<TTgy ��C�Q oFU�a'K a'Kl UU� L �F P� < 0 4 G V CUB m m C > CO000 0 o.0o v loco :3�rntnnMCDrn 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 l f9 O 0000N LO M to O h00�O (000(D Lo CD M� iN CD LT Io n Cl? N— —— N LO M V M Lo: o 0 0 0 0 `�OtO N 0 - I = o 0 0 0 0 COO M a)OO, Q Mtn O0n Q�N LAn00 CLn N - N 4 Lo V Lo M Ln !. 1 Lj O o 0 0 o LO O O1OLo(D CdIN too M 0 �c000(D r N O 2 i N= .- N Ln V to V to COO Ln Ln M� 0(O o Co O CD�� N Lf')O W OtT �MOO(D � LL N — — — N 11 (D Lo 0 R LD ry o 0 0 0 0 (O o 0 0 0 0 C, O M C M (O a, 0b N O 10 N r- .- .- M C M O O .cu (D Lo (D Ln to a) a o 0 0 0 0 N o O o 0 0 EcDL�aovo nl I Lnvm U W V M 00 V N V a)N=Nr- Cl) NCO LO (D to 0 � O o 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 Lo O D)ON M (00 0 N a O CO N— m Z OCOOCOO CD Z' A o 0 0 0 o D o o e o 0 0 0 — r-- Di UO NIo 0Nf� OOO M MON U111:NMMN to U V NMN M UCD CDOO (D a L o 0 0 0 o NI a Leo o o EMO DQ MO .- (D NOM V N ECM to CD .-M NM NN Ln y V MMM It (aL) D O U U) j 0 0 0 o o j o 0 0 0 N o >Ln C N In nLon MMNLO Q Ic ri m of a Q (D cc (O CO co t ()0O(nMa 00 >,11r�n Nvr ITLn I'llV (D O M M N N V7 M V co C �,CD CO O CD (D N LA N N C C C C a) E E E (y N a) a) N y N a) > > > > N C C a) m mE UQ m 0E UQ y n a_ Q) a)> o _ a' O � > d O . a.LLQQ' O dLLQ2 Cca N N N m N N N m C C 013 sOCI j mE C` N EEEmD N f0 N l0 C EEEw� q N (a (0 ` '7 2p WWW �� WWW co m J (0 Co N N N_ a) (0 N N N C y (O U O �_ O O w 0 7 7 m O m N O I m O r N_ M L C C C x> Q C C C N LL C C C .x > Q US QQ Q(n QJ QQ Q(n QJ 0 4" CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CITY RDA RDA FA BALANCE SHEET 05/31/02 FIXED LONG TERM FIXED LONG TERM FINANCING LONG TERM GRAND CITY ASSETS DEBT RDA ASSETS DEBT AUTHORITY DEBT TOTAL ASSETS: POOLED CASH 14,160,953,99 17,758,989.04 57,381.54 31.977.324 57 LQRP INVESTMENT IN POOLED CASH 670,000.00 670,000 00 INVESTMENT T-BILUNOTcS 8 OTHER 39,000,000.00 39,000,000. 00 AUTO MALL CASH LORP CASH 55,539.24 55,539 24 BOND REDEMPTION CASH 13,068.22 244 13,090 66 BOND RESERVE CASH BOND PROJECT CASH 43,949,426.03 184,426.36 44.133,852 39 BOND ESCROW CASH PETTY CASH 1,000.00 _ 1,00000 CASH B.INVESTMENT TOTAL 53,161,953.99 62.447.042,53 241,810.34 115.850,80686 INVESTMENT IN LAND HELD FOR RESALE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 44.692.34 60,900.00 105,592 34 PREMIUMIDISCOUNT ON INVESTMENT (67.191.22) (67,191 22) LQRP-ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 49,545 80 49,545 80 INTEREST RECEIVABLE 5,942.62 5,94262 LOAN/NOTES RECEIVABLE 13,489,353. 69 13,489,353 69 DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES 820,898.89 820,898 89 DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES - CVAG 2.299,096. 69 2,299,096. 69 CVAG ALLOWANCE (2,299,096,69) (2,299,096.69) DUE FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTS 0.37 037 DUE FROM OTHER FUNDS 551.038.04 551,038 04 DUE FROM RDA 8,497,550.20 8,497.550 20 INTEREST ADVANCE -DUE FROM RDA 3,929,473. 63 3,929,473.63 ADVANCES TO OTHER FUNDS 56,483.22 2,745,618.71 2,802,101.93 NSF CHECKS RECEIVABLE 2,901.86 2.90186 ACCRUED REVENUE 833.40 83340 FIXED ASSETS 20,711,742. 00 20,711,742 00 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION 711,534.48 711,53448 TRAVEL ADVANCES 2,819.00 2.819.00 EMPLOYEE ADVANCES PREPAID EXPENSES 15,496.25 _ 15,496.25 RECEIVABLE TOTAL 14,020,601.64 20,711,742.00 16,897,289.64 51,629,63328 WORKER COMPENSATION DEPOSIT RENT DEPOSITS UTILITY DEPOSITS 75.00 75.00 MISC DEPOSITS 2,100.00 2.10000 DEPOSITS TOTAL 2,175.00 2,17500 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS 9,988,279.05 9,988,279 05 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AMOUNT AVAILABLE TO RETIRE L/T DEBT 3,395. 117.03 3,395,117 03 AMOUNT TO BE PROVIDED FOR L/T DEBT 951,847 65 80,866.860. 97 7,750.000 00 89,568.706 62 TOTAL OTHER ASSETS 951,847.65 6,988.279. 05 84,261.978. 00 7,750.00000 102,952,104.70 TOTAL ASSETS 67 184,730 63 20 771 742,00 951 847 65 79 344 332,17 9 988 279.05 84 261 978.00 241 B10.347750 000.00 270,434 719,84 LIABILITIES: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 13,650.17 (150.00) 13,500 17 DUE TO OTHER AGENCIES 1,986,639. 07 1,986,639 07 DUE TO OTHER FUNDS 1,594,528.29 1,594,528.29 INTEREST ADVANCE -DUE TO CITY 2,745.618,71 11,383,537.00 14,129,155. 71 ACCRUED EXPENSES 16.468.50 16,468.50 PAYROLL LIABILITIES 33,199.94 33.199.94 STRONG MOTION INSTRUMENTS 3.080.66 3,08066 FRINGE TOED LIZARD FEES 78,981,50 78.981 50 SUSPENSE (63,21) (63 21) DUE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA — PAYABLESTOTAL 4,861,106.84 _ 12,994,383. 79 17,855.49063 ENGINEERING TRUST DEPOSITS SO COAST AIR QUALITY DEPO-ITS LQRP DEPOSITS 15,695.00 15,695.00 DEVELOPER DEPOSITS 877.697,16 877.697. 16 MISC. DEPOSITS 439,168.66 439.168.66 AGENCY FUND DEPOSITS 1,992,175.84 __ __ _. 1,992.175. 84 TOTAL DEPOSITS 3,309,041.66 15,695.00 3,324,736 66 DEFERRED REVENUE 934,698.89 11.378,904. 00 12,313,602 89 OTHER LIABILITIES TOTAL 934,698.89 11.378,904. 00 12,313,602.89 COMPENSATED ABSENCES PAYABLE 373,536.65 373.536 65 DUE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA 578,311.00 189,725.50 768,036. 50 DUE TO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 10.989,847. 00 10,989,847. 00 DUE TO C.V. UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. 8.747.405. 50 8.747,405. 50 DUE TO DESERT SANDS SCHOOL DIST. 64,335.000. 00 7,750,000.00 72,085,000. 00 BONDS PAYABLE TOTAL LONG TERM DEBT __ 951,847.65 84,261,978.00 7,750,000.00 92,963,825.65 TOTAL LIABILITIES 9,104,847.39 951,847.65 24,388,982.79 84.261.978.00 7,750,000.00 126,457,655.83 EQUITY -FUND BALANCE 58,079,883,32 20,711,742. 00 54,955,349.38 9,988,279. 05 241,810.34 143,977.064. 09 TOTAL LIABILITY & EQUITY 67,184,730.71 20,711,742.00 951 84T65 79 344,332.17 9.988 279.05 84.26' 978 00 241 810,34 7,75000000 270 434 719.92 (0.08) 0.00 0.00 (0,08) CASH 8, INVESTMENT TOTAL 115,850,806.86 PREMIUM/DISCOUNT ON INVESTMENT 167 191.22 03 TOTAL 115,783,615.64 - oil T4tyl 4 XP 4" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Transmittal of Revenue and Expenditure Reports dated May 31, 2002 and Investment Summary Report for the Quarter Ending June 30, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 3 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Transmittal of the May 31, 2002 Statement of Revenue and Expenditures for the City of La Quinta and Investment Summary Report for the Quarter Ending June 30, 2002. Resp fully submitted, 4 /,1 i J hn M. Falco e , Finance Director A proved for submission b Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments 1 : Revenue and Expenditures Report, May 31, 2002 2: Investment Summary Report for the Quarter Ending June 30, 2002 041 ATTACHMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA REVENUES - ALL FUNDS 07/01/2001 - 05/31/2002 F FUNDS BUDGET RECEIVED % RECEIVED General $15,756,131.08 $16,617,840.50 105.5% Library 95,000.00 91,662.37 96.5% Gas Tax Revenue 435,318.27 530,324.80 121.8% Cmaq/lstea 287,423.00 0.00 0.0% Federal Assistance 543,825.00 305,617.99 56.2% Assessment District 2000-1 0.00 14,145.99 0.0% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 102,391.75 101,982.44 99.6% Local Law Enforcement 27,004.00 27,356.56 101.3% Lighting & Landscaping 781,400.00 734,163.94 94.0% Quimby 16,500.00 139,901.28 847.9% Infrastructure 11,000.00 103,351.36 939.6% Village Parking 100.00 0.00 0.0% South Coast Air Quality 24,481.00 22,485.05 91.8% LQ Public Safety Officer 2,200.00 2,341.23 106.4% Interest Allocation 0.00 259,121.53 0.0% Capital Improvement 101,296,592.76 12,941,175.57 12.8% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 450.90 0.0% Urban Forestry 11,000.00 9,900.00 90.0% Equipment Replacement 363,180.00 364,700.08 100.4% Information Technology 1,000,000.00 1,020,093.54 102.0% Arts In Public Places 132,900.00 117,973.77 88.8% Transportation 307,100.00 713,882.35 232.5% Parks & Recreation 221,500.00 394,527.50 178.1 % Civic Center 323,100.00 562,215.38 174.0% Library Development 167,900.00 225,053.98 134.0% Community Center 58,600.00 101,313.52 172.9% Street Facility 10,500.00 22,370.92 213.1 % Park Facility 3,200.00 5,674.91 177.3% La Quinta Financing Authority 688,544.00 703,538.23 102.2% RDA Project Area No. 1 121,348,820.38 81,441,758.46 67.1 % RDA Project Area No. 2 11,376,903.00 10,084,507.37 88.6% Total $255,392,614.24 $127,659,431.52 50.0% 0711) G G 3 CITY OF LA QUINTA EXPENDITURES -ALL FUNDS 07/01/2001 - 05/31/2002 FUNDs BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED REMAINING BUDGET EXPENDED General _ $16,898,496.44 $12,160,472.60 $21,008.43 $4,717,015.41 72.0% Library 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Gas Tax 594,377.92 515,626.70 0.00 78,751.22 86.8% Cmaq/Istea 287,423.00 0.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.0% Federal Assistance 166,638.99 31,813.99 0.00 134,825.00 19.1% Proposed Assessment District 682,553.47 571,335.68 0.00 111,217.79 83.7% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 100,191.75 83,939.25 0.00 16,252.50 83.8% Local Law Enforcement 0.00 1,819.63 0.00 (1,819.63) 0.0% Lighting & Landscaping 781,400.00 839,850.37 0.00 (58,450.37) 107.5% Quimby 382,806.29 279,362.36 0.00 103,443.93 73.0% Infrastructure 3,022,108.18 547,030.00 0.00 2,475,078.18 18.1% Village Parking (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% South Coast Air Quality 0.00 6,977.81 0.00 (6,977.81) 0.0% Lq Public Safety Officer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Interest Allocation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Capital Improvement 101,296,593.11 12,941,175.56 12,696.43 88,342,721.12 12.8% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 63,579.59 0.00 (63,579.59) 0.0% (Urban Forestry 11,000.00 9,900.00 0.00 1,100.00 90.0% Equipment Replacement 380,209.00 148,800.96 46,317.47 185,090.57 39.1 % Arts In Public Places 689,515.71 117,612.71 0.00 571,903.00 17.1% Transportation 3,035,989.00 529,149.57 0.00 2,506,839.43 17.4% Parks & Recreation 4,508,263.00 297,762.71 0.00 4,210,500.29 6.6% Civic Center 204,660.00 190,481.70 0.00 14,178.30 93.1% Library Development 623,324.00 40,519.26 0.00 582,804.74 6.5% Community Center 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Street Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Park Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Information Technology 476,372.00 300,168.88 0.00 176,203.12 63.0% La Quinta Financing Authority 1,209,498.78 1,107,846.28 0.00 101,652.50 91.6% RDA Project Area No. 1 98,322,029.86 44,838,530.04 0.00 53,483,499.82 45.6% RDA Project Area No. 2 16,842,472.44 9,665,951.37 11,270.00 7,165,251.07 57.4% Total $250,514,030.09 $85,289,707.02 $91,292.33 $165,133,030.74 34.0% 0 51_ G 4 CITY OF LA QUINTA GENERAL FUND REVENUES DETAIL TAXES: Property Tax No Low Property Tax Distribution Document Transfer Tax Sales Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Franchise Tax TOTAL TAXES LICENSE & PERMITS: Business License Animal License Building Permits Plumbing Permits Electrical Permits Mechanical Permits Misc. Permits TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS FEES: Sale of Maps & Publications Community Services Fees Bldg & Safety Fees Community Development Fees Public Works Fees TOTAL FEES INTERGOVERNMENTAL Motor Vehicle In -Lieu Motor Vehicle Code Fines Parking Violations Misc. Fines AB939 State of California Grant Fire servicesCredit CSA152 Assessment TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL INTEREST Gain on sale of investments MISCELLANEOUS Miscellaneous Revenue Cash Over/(Short) TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFERIN TOTAL GENERAL FUND 07101 /2001 - 05131 /2002 REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 520,600.00 525,476.22 (4,876.22) 100.940% 450,600.00 703,638.71 (253,038.71) 156.160% 380,000.00 383,645.30 (3,645.30) 100.960% 3,217,500.00 3,026,938.68 190,561.32 94.080% 3,595,000.00 3,526,615.27 68,384.73 98.100% 537,500.00 417,191.61 120,308.39 77.620% 8,701,200.00 8,583,505.79 117,694.21 98.650% 152,000.00 154,054.00 (2,054.00) 101.350% 12,400.00 11,637.25 762.75 93.850% 412,500.00 1,076,406.20 (663,906.20) 260.950% 89,400.00 175,271.58 (85,871.58) 196.050% 68,000.00 183,772.00 (115,772.00) 270.250% 37,000.00 99,568.62 (62,568.62) 269.100% 48,300.00 42,485.98 5,814.02 87.960% 819,600.00 1,743,195.63 (923,595.63) 212.690% 2,150.00 1,051.20 157, 825.00 154,161.01 357,950.00 715,058.70 222,000.00 228,685.87 468,550.00 542,282.41 1,208,475.00 1,641,239.19 1,098.80 48.890% 3,663.99 97.680% (357,108.70) 199.760% (6,685.87) 103.010% (73,732.41) 115.740% (432,764.19) 135.810% 1,257,600.00 1,186,086.21 71,513.79 94.310% 50,300.00 30,987.40 19,312.60 61.610% 25,000.00 45,909.00 (20,909.00) 183.640% 5,000.00 16,327.24 (11,327.24) 326.540% 159,900.00 136,270.53 23,629.47 85.220% 134,105.00 107,456.45 26,648.55 80.130% 1,595,979.00 798,744.00 797,235.00 50.050% 126,700.00 32,309.17 94,390.83 25.500% 3,354,584.00 2,354,090.00 1,000,494.00 70.180% 1,535,600.00 1,678,479.74 (142,879.74) 109.300% 0.00 461,082.85 (461,082.85) 0.000% 27,700.00 62,638.73 (34,938.73) 226.130% 0.00 (131.71) 131.71 0.000% 27,700.00 62,507.02 (34,807.02) 225.660% 108,972.08 93,740.28 15,231.80 86.020% 15 756 131.08 16 617 840.50 (861 709.42) 105.470% n5� CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL LIBRARY: County of Riverside Interest TOTAL LIBRARY GAS TAX REVENUE: Section 2105 Section 2106 Section 2107 Section 2107.5 Traffic Congestion Relief Interest TOTAL GAS TAX CMAQ/ISTEA CMAQ/ISTEA Grant Interest TOTAL CMAQIISTEA FEDERAL ASSISTANCE REVENUE: CDBG Grant Interest TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1 Interest Assessment Bond Proceeds Prepayments -sewer assessments Transfer in TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SLESF (COPS) REVENUE: SLESF (Cops) Funding Interest TOTAL SLESF (COPS) LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT REVENUE: LLEBG Funding Interest Transfer in TOTAL LLEBG LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING REVENUE: Assessment Developer Interest TOTAL LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING QUIMBY REVENUE: Quimby Fees Interest TOTAL QUIMBY REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 75,000.00 75,000.00 0.00 100.000% 20,000.00 16,662.37 3,337.63 83.310% 95,000.00 91,662.37 3,337.63 96.490% 135,600.00 151,071.12 (15,471.12) 111.410% 98,200.00 105,236.32 (7,036.32) 107.170% 175,100.00 198,239.52 (23,139.52) 113.220% 5,000.00 6,000.00 (1,000.00) 120.000% 13,718.27 59,842.05 (46,123.78) 436.220% 7,700.00 9,935.79 (2,235.79) 129.040% 435,318.27 530,324.80 (95,006.53) 121.820% 287,423.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% _ 287,423.00 0.00 287,423.00 0.000% 543,825.00 305,617.99 238,207.01 56.200% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 543,825.00 305,617.99 238,207.01 56.200% 14,145.99 (14,145.99) 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% _ 0.00 14145.99 (14145.99) 0.000% 100,191.75 100,191.75 0.00 100.000% 2,200.00 1,790.69 409.31 81.400% 102,391.75 101,982.44 409.31 99.600% 26,704.00 26,704.00 0.00 100.000% 300.00 652.56 (352.56) 217.520% 0.00 0.00 0.000% _ 27 004.00 27,356.56 (352.56) 101.310% 781,400.00 734,163.94 47,236.06 93.950% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 781,400.00 734,163.94 47,236.06 93.950% 126,375.00 (126,375.00) 0.000% 16,500.00 13,526.28 2,973.72 81.980% 16 500.00 139 901.28 (123,401.28) 847.890% CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) INFRASTRUCTURE REVENUE: Infrastructure Fee Interest Transfer in TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE VILLAGE PARKING REVENUE: Interest TOTAL VILLAGE PARKING SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY REVENUE: S.C.A.Q. Contribution Interest TOTALSCAQ LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER FUND Transfer In Interest TOTAL LQ PUBLIC SAFETY INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND: Pooled Cash Allocated Interest Transfer In TOTAL INTEREST ALLOCATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: CVAG CVWD County of Riverside State of Ca- Office Emer. Services JPIA IID DSUSD State of California SB300 Funding Surface Transportation SB821-Bicycle Path Grant APP Contribution Developer Agreement Funding Transfers in From Other Funds TOTAL CIP REVENUE LQ NORTE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: Prepayment Bond Proceeds Interest TOTAL LQ NORTE CIP URBAN FORESTRY Grant Revenue Interest TOTAL URBAN FORESTRY REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 0.00 0.00 0.000% 11,000.00 103,351.36 (92,351.36) 939.560% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 11,000.00 103,351.36 (92,351.36) 939.560% 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.000% 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.000% 21,881.00 20,933.46 947.54 95.670% 2,600.00 1,551.59 1,048.41 59.680% 24,481.00 22,485.05 1,995.95 91.850% 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 100.000% 200.00 341.23 (141.23) 170.620% 2,200.00 2,341.23 (141.23) 106.420% 259,121.53 (259,121.53) 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 259121.53 (259,121.53) 0.000% 13,655,958.18 2,537,572.56 11,118,385.62 18.580% 1,709,906.00 0.00 1,709,906.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 100.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 530,600.00 0.00 530,600.00 0.000% 19,365.74 0.00 19,365.74 0.000% 12,000,118.00 0.00 12,000,118.00 0.000% 93,175.00 37,822.00 55,353.00 40.590% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 182,142.84 59,149.77 122,993.07 32.470% 73,080,327.00 10,281,631.24 62,798,695.76 14.070% 101,296,592.76 12,941,175.57 88,355,417.19 12.780% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 450.90 (450.90) 0.000% _ 0.00 450.90 (450.90) 0.000% 11,000.00 9,900.00 1,100.00 90.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 11.000.00 9.900.00 1.100.00 90.000% 115 it CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND: Equipment Charges 304,980.00 304,982.00 (2.00) 100.000% Capital Contribution 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 58,200.00 59,718.08 (1,518.08) 102.610% Transfers In 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 363 180.00 364 700.08 (1,520.08) 100.420% INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND: Charges for services Capital Contribution Interest Transfers In TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES REVENUE: Arts in Public Places Arts in Public Places Credits Applied Interest TOTAL ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES TRANSPORTATION Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL TRANSPORTATION PARKS & RECREATION Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION CIVIC CENTER Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL CIVIC CENTER LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT Developer fees Interest Transfer in TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY CENTER Developer fees Interest TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 20,093.54 (20,093.54) 0.000% 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 100.000% 1,000,000.00 1020,093.54 (20,093.54) 102.010% 111,300.00 99,143.47 12,156.53 89.080% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 21,600.00 18,830.30 2,769.70 87.180% 132,900.00 117,973.77 14,926.23 88.770% 284,000.00 619,118.49 (335,118.49) 218.000% 23,100.00 94,763.86 (71,663.86) 410.230% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 307,100.00 713,882.35 (406 782.35) 232.460% 201,000.00 350,422.00 (149,422.00) 174.340% 20,500.00 44,105.50 (23,605.50) 215.150% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 221500.00 394,527.50 (173,027.50) 178.120% 284,500.00 527,170.04 (242,670.04) 185.300% 38,600.00 35,045.34 3,554.66 90.790% 0.00 0.00 0.000% _ 323 100.00 562 215.38 (239,115.38) 174.010% 150,000.00 206,089.00 (56,089.00) 137.390% 17,900.00 18,964.98 (1,064.98) 105.950% 0.00 0.00 0.000% 167 900.00 225 053.98 (57 153.98) 134.040% 53,500.00 93,254.00 (39,754.00) 174.310% 5,100.00 8,059.52 (2,959.52) 158.030% 58 600.00 101 313.52 (42 713.52) 172.890% CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) STREET FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL STREET FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL PARK FACILITY REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 9,500.00 20,595.96 (11,095.96) 216.800% 1,000.00 1,774.96 (774.96) 177.500% 10,500.00 22,370.92 (11,870.92) 213.060% 3,000.00 5,205.00 (2,205.00) 173.500% 200.00 469.91 (269.91) 234.960% 3,200.00 5,674.91 (2,474.91) 177.340% ()5C GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT 07/01/2001-05/31/2002 REMAINING % BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED GENERAL GOVERNMENT: LEGISLATIVE 585,800.00 395,649.96 0.00 190,150.04 67.5% CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 613,200.00 492,931.03 0.00 120,268.97 80.4% ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 935,000.00 749,861.58 0.00 185,138.42 80.2% PERSONNEL/RISK MGT 572,872.00 469,291.18 0.00 103,580.82 81.9% TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 2,706,872.00 2,107,733.75 0.00 599.138.25 77.9% FINANCE: FISCAL SERVICES 542,515.00 487.892.12 0.00 54,622.88 89.9% CENTRAL SERVICES 311,205.00 246,653.38 0.00 64,551.62 79.30% TOTAL FINANCE 853,720.00 734,545.50 0.00 119,174.50 86.0% CITY CLERK 373,750.00 317,544.89 0.00 56,205.11 85.0% COMMUNITY SERVICES SENIOR CENTER 265,475.00 216.213.69 1,545.00 47,716.31 81.4% PARKS & RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 813,258.00 614,184.03 6,489.35 192,584.62 75.5% PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAMS 90,800.00 58,639.98 0.00 32,160.02 64.6% TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 1,169,533.00 889,037.70 8,034.35 272,460.95 76.0% POLICE 4,189,385.75 2,762,100.65 0.00 1,427,285.10 65.9% BUILDING & SAFETY: BUILDING & SAFETY - ADMIN 179,700.00 171.427.27 0.00 8,272.73 95.4% CODE COMPLIANCE 478,484.00 369,905.78 0.00 108,578.22 77.3% ANIMAL CONTROL 166,043.00 135,456.72 0.00 30,586.28 81.6% BUILDING 713,488.00 587,831.98 0.00 125,656.02 82.4% EMERGENCY SERVICES 96,524.00 80,374.62 0.00 16,149.38 83.3% FIRE 1,663,257.00 832,846.24 0.00 830,410.76 50.1% CIVIC CENTER BUILDING -OPERATIONS 1,088,751.00 1,064,905.69 0.00 23,845.31 97.8% TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY 4.386,247.00 3,242,748.30 0.00 1,143,498.70 73.9% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - ADMIN 472,450.00 327,385.63 0.00 145,064.37 69.3% CURRENT PLANNING 814,807.00 497,713.70 934.08 316,159.22 61.1% TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,287,257.00 825,099.33 934.08 461,223.59 64A % PUBLIC WORKS: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 336,100.00 252.333.94 0.00 83,766.06 75.1°/ DEVELOPMENT & TRAFFIC 943,668.00 757,433.10 4,240.00 181,994.90 80.3% MAINT/OPERATIONS - STREETS 1,431.059.00 526,685.21 0.00 904,373.79 36.8% MAINT/OPERATIONS - LTG/LANDSCAPING 1,359,699.00 1,109,373.01 7,800.00 242,525.99 81.6% CAPITAL PROJECTS 387,420.00 158,271.17 0.00 229,148.83 40.9% TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 4,457,946,00 2,804,096.43 12,04&00 1,641,809.57 62.9% TRANSFERS OUT 1,611,269.30 1,467,702.07 0.00 143,567.23 91.1% GENERAL FUND REIMBURSEMENTS (4,137,483.61) (2,990,136.02) 0.00 (1,147,347.59) 72.3% NET GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 16 898 496.44 12 160 472.60 21 008.43 4,717,015.41 72.0% �5 CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2001 - 05/31/2002 OTHER CITY FUNDS REMAINING % EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED LIBRARY FUND: PROJECT EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% GAS TAX REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 435,298.40 386,466.63 0.00 48,831.77 88.8% TRANSFER OUT 159,079.52 129,160.07 0.00 29,919.45 81.2% REIMBURSE GE TOTAL GAS TAX 594 377.92 515 626.70 0.00 78 751.22 86.8% QUIMBY FUND: TRANSFER OUT 382 806.29 279 362.36 0.00 103 443.93 73.0% FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND: TRANSFER OUT 166 638.99 31 813.99 0.00 134 825.00 19.1 % SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 6,977.81 0.00 (6,977.81) 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 0.00 6,977.81 0.00 (6,977,81) 0.0% CMAQ/ISTEA TRANSFER OUT 287 423.00 0.00 0.00 287 423.00 0.0% VILLAGE Parking TRANSFER OUT (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRIBUTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% LLEBG FUND TRANSFER OUT 0.00 1,819,63 0.00 (1 819.63) 0.0% SLESF (COPS) TRANSFER OUT 100 191.75 83 939.25 0.00 16 252.50 83.8% LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DIST: REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 781,400.00 839,850.37 0.00 (58,450,37) 107.5% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL LTG/LANDSCAPING FUND 781 400.00 839 850.37 0.00 (58 450.37) 107.5% INFRASTRUCTURE FUND CONSTRUCTION 4,670,00 4,670,00 &00 0.00 100.0% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0°/ TRANSFER OUT 3,017,438.18 542,360.00 0.00 2,475,078.18 18.0% TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE 3,022,108.18 547 030.00 0.00 2,475,078.18 18.1 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2000-1 COSTS OF ISSUANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER TO AGENCY FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 682,553.47 571,335.68 0.00 111,217.79 83.7% TOTAL AD 2000-1 682 553.47 571 335.68 0.00 111 217.79 83.7% q5R CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/2001-06/31/2002 OTHER CITY FUNDS REMAINING EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM COSTS 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 3,035,989.00 529,149.57 0.00 2,506,839.43 17.4% TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 3,035,989.00 529 149.57 0.00 2,506,839.43 17.4% PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 4,508,263.00 297,762.71 0.00 4.210,500.29 6.6% TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 4,508,263.00 297 762.71 0.00 4,210,500.29 6.6% CIVIC CENTER PROGRAM COSTS 2,876.70 0.00 (2,876.70) 0.0% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 204,660.00 187,605.00 0.00 17,055.00 91.7% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL CIVIC CENTER 204 660.00 190 481.70 0.00 14 178.30 93.1 % LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 623,324.00 40,519.26 0.00 582,804.74 6.5% TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 623 324.00 40 519.26 0.00 582 804.74 6.5% COMMUNITY CENTER PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09/0 STREET FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL STREET FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% PARK FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% TOTAL PARK FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 99,977,669.34 12,645,724.54 12,696.43 87,319.248.37 12.6% PROJECT REIMBURSEMENTS TO GEN FUND 1,318,923.77 295,451.02 0.00 1.023,472.75 22.4% TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 101 296 593.11 12 941 175.56 12 696.43 88 342 721.12 12.8% ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND MAINTENANCE EXPENSES-APP 2,000.00 1,830.00 0.00 170.00 91.5% OPERATING EXPENSES-APP 5,000.00 (176.50) 0.00 5,176.50 -3.5% ART PURCHASES 265,340.00 27,597,50 0.00 237,742.50 10.4% TRANSFER OUT _ 417,175.71 88,361.71 0.00 328,814.00 21.2% TOTAL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES 689 515.71 117 612.71 0.00 57l 903.00 17.1 % LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND PROJECT EXPENSES 0.00 4,176.20 0.00 (4,176.20) 0.0% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 59,403.39 0.00 (59,403.39) 0.0% TOTAL LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND 0.00 63 579.59 0.00 (63 579.59) 0.0% URBAN FORESTRY GRANT TRANSFER OUT 11 000.00 9,900.00 0.00 1,100.00 90.0% VILLAGE PARKING TRANSFER OUT (1,892.85) 0.00 0.00 (1,892.85) 0.0% INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 476 372.00 300 168.88 0.00 176 203.12 63.0% EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 380 209.00 148 800.96 46 317.47 185 090.57 39.1 % 05q ATTACHMENT 2 a) 0 c 0 O LL m E E U) C O E C 7 > O (J C O m >. N J c O 0 r M w C UC�=5 U r U) O U Mh01--t -NNNM(n(nC) <- (n N wlzt w N O� d• I- 00 N (O O r CO (ONLn(.()LOcot-0 Lo� (D N MI�LI)(DNNCAI�I�I��-�(0(0 ti LO 0) 0) I- N 00 a) a) O O O v) (OLO CD 0 c OOc OOO cl Cri MCmm CA NO co 4 N 4 4 Lo V •-- �i N--:i �2 (4 (D Q I I _ d (0 "It N (n N CD O N N M M M I- r- M 00 M I- (n 1 Ih 0(n 00--(D(D hMM In Lf) 4 6 C') CA U•) 00 6 (D (D 00 ei• LD 0 I - - CA i (O m wM wti N O O O 0 ti LO (0 (D CACA00000C:nCF)CnCAOCA 04 r- !6 M 4 c\f 1x -t Lo Lo c') (O Zo N 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 C) It 0000000000000 coN. 0) ( p r- 0000000000000 L n 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 (0 0 0 m � O O O O O O O O O O O O O N CA IL q7 O(MLntLo(nNNNOMOC')O(1) O O O O O O O CD CD O L w O O CD O O co O N N N O O O O N N N N N N (C L 1 1 1 _ 0 a) 7) m m m U D 7 7 m U (1) ( C zmO»0�o� I(D-�NLO LO N zz O N O M CO M(jNNO N c L L L > -- 0 0 0 0 O m m m ~ m m z Z z z aCL 00 00 c Z` Z` L` Z, Z• Z m m m a) 0 0 a. d 4) y :m m= m= U 0 uzZZ E m� rn�OUOa)a) mm EEE (n(n > ~ ~ O O O cu UUU U U O v7 !n 'O •D 0 O C C a) �j Il LL C O C C > o m w .• c (D m Q E E c @ E C c 6Vi U E m 5 0 0 0GO) > d a)_ y a) N C > ZSS��Z�' - E Ems. U U O O M C C m U) c ci m 2 z a 0 O 0000000 C O O m m m Q Q m Ht`—F-HF-HtL— m EU o a) a) m m ° ' m(6Umfnujm L °ffi g"Oa"O U U� N :52CoMLLLLLLJJ(n (D a) c6 m -0 -0 Q Q 0 0 cn a) a) J _I C N E a) c a) 0 0 U m O c C c =3 •� O V -i L U 0 U U m a) a .L L a)o� � � m c o m U > O m m C E C Vl f6 .0 0 0 O -0°E 1= LL OL O CA c n c a)CD y c c= � E . -0 N C in a) 00 0 > U E U C M 0-0- a) t•' a) cu U) U) d' u LC 00 ,0 F' U 7 Co .O� 0 > Y a) Y U L m Il U 2 o 6 r) T4'yl 4 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: jUly 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE• Authorization for Overnight Travel for the Community Development Director and One Staff Member to Attend the State-wide American Planning Association Conference to be Held in San Diego, California, October 6-9, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: -4 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Community Development Director and one staff member to attend the State-wide American Planning Association Conference to be held in San Diego, California, October 6-9, 2002. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Budget allocated $15,000 for travel, training, and meetings for staff. Attendance at this conference is estimated to be $1,000 per person based on the following costs: Registration $ 330 Hotel reservation $ 428 Travel $ 100 Meals 142 TOTAL $1,000 These funds are budgeted in the Travel and Meetings Account for the Community Development Department (101-401-637-000 and 101-402-637-000). CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: A description of the conference sessions is included for your information (Attachment 1). Funds have been budgeted for staff to attend this conference. n61 G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\CDDTravel.wpd FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Community Development Director and one staff member to attend the State-wide American Planning Association Conference to be held in San Diego, California, October 6-9, 2002; or 2. Do not approve the authorization for overnight travel for the Community Development Director and one staff member to attend the State-wide American Planning Association Conference to be held in San Diego, California, October 6-9, 2002; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, �ry Herman mmunity Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment 1 . Conference schedule /1Re� G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\CDDTravel.wpd Welcome to P1anDiego ATTACHMENT #1 t: M05il.E 5F_ AN Here to Return to the Home Page Please select which conference sessions you would like to view from the drop menu below: ---Select One--- 1� Because of circumstances outside our control, EXPECT MODIFICATIONS in the participation, date, and time of some of the sessions described below. The final schedule will be in your 2002 CCAPA Conference Program. AICP College Bowl IV (A.K.A Planning Jeopardy) The gauntlet is down and the challenge is set: Send us your quick, your bright, your erudite. Each California section of APA has been invited to form an Ober -team, a group of planners with a knowledge of the profession so splendid, so stunning, so awesome that other planners wilt in their presence. Or something like that. In this battle of the planning brains, teams compete for prizes and the highly coveted title of AICP College Bowl Champion. Remember Ebanezer Howard? Know what city planner is father of a footloose film star? Recall what BANANAS and CAVES have in common? Well, maybe nobody does .... or then again, maybe some brilliant team knows it all! Come find out. Come and cheer, come and hiss, come watch contestants hit and miss. It's all just a game, isn't it? - Session 101, Tuesday, 3:15 PM Participants: Frank Wein, FAICP, Environmental Planning Manager, URS Corporation, Los Angeles, CA; Steven A. Preston, FAICP, Deputy City Manager, San Gabriel, CA; David Storer, AICP, Director of Planning, Inspections & Permitting, City of Folsom, CA; Mike Waiczis, AICP, Executive Officer, Fresno LAFCO, Fresno, CA; Marjorie Blom, LAFCO Analyst, Stanislaus LAFCO, Modesto, CA. AICP Exam Workshop This workshop introduces the AICP certification process, explains why a planner should seek certification, reviews the structure and key topics of the AICP exam, and gives session attendees sample questions to solve. The goal of the workshop is to provide a quick look at the ease/difficulty of test questions and provide focused direction for individual study and preparation. - Session 102, Monday, 3:15 PM (CPDP Credit: 1.5) Participants: Mike Waiczis, AICP, CCAPA Vice President for Professional Development Applying the "Green Streets" Approach to the Stormwater Permitting Quagmire Communities in California are being challenged to create and comply with new NPDES stormwater permitting regulations. These challenges also provide them the opportunity to integrate techniques for stormwater treatment, impervious surface reduction, and habitat preservation into the design of their neighborhoods. In addition to case studies Ul�`� Welcome to Planlliego Page 2 of 12 in the San Francisco Bay Area, the "Green Streets" handbook from the Metro Region of Portland will be presented that directly addresses the conflict between stream protection and development, and examines the role of ecological street design in stormwater management and treatment. A similar strategy is a viable option for stormwater permit compliance in California. - Session 103, Tuesday, 1:45 PM Participants: Clark I/ViIson, Associate, Community Design + Architecture, Oakland, CA; Keith Lichen, ASCE, Water Resource Control Engineer, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland, CA. Big Plan/Small Budget: A Strategic Approach While some jurisdictions spend millions of dollars updating their general plans, the City of San Diego Planning Department updated its 20-year-oid General Plan for a whole lot less. In fact, the feat was accomplished with minimal staff resources and less than $100,000 in non -personnel costs. The secret was to securing donated time and services. As one victim willing victim describes it, "Consultants were sweetalked into donating $2 million worth of billing time - and enjoying it!" Big Plan/Small Budget is an opportunity to hear how the City of San Diego Planning Department shifted priorities to handle the effort, engaged a citizen committee to provide professional oversight, and partnered with other government agencies, organizations, and citizen groups to achieve a major planning effort on a shoestring budget. Regrets? There were a few. But there were also lots of lessons learned, and they'll be shared. - Session 104, Tuesday, 10:45 AM Participants: Coleen Clementson, Program Manager, City of San Diego General Plan, San Diego, CA; Catherine Cleary, Public Policy and Outreach Program Manager, San Diego Planning Department, San Diego, CA. CEQA Update for 2002 Each year the Legislature and courts add new requirements to, or new interpretations of, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This year, the Resources Agency is proposing revisions to the State CEQA Guidelines that provide new interpretations of CEQA statute and case law. This is the first substantive revision to the Guidelines since late 1998. In CEQA Update for 2002, a panel will addresses new and pending CEQA legislation for 2002; the past year's CEQA litigation; and what's on the horizon for CEQA. This session is a must for public agency planners, CEQA consultants, and those who know CEQA basics but need to keep up to date with changes. - Session 106, Tuesday, 9 AM Participants: Ron Bass, JD, A/CP, Principal, Jones & Stokes, Sacramento, CA; Antero (Terry) Rivasplata, AICP, Senior Environmental Planner, Jones & Stokes, Sacramento, CA; Terry Roberts, State Clearinghouse Director, Governor's Office of Planning and Research, Sacramento, CA. Caltrans has an Epiphany: Land Use and Transportation are Connected! Some said it could never happen. Yet now, in Caltrans Has an Epiphany, Caltrans representatives provide an overview of the internal changes in the California Transportation Agency that respond to the interaction between land use and transportation decisions. Hear about the specific policies, directives, and projects that support the principles of Smart Growth and Livable Communities. Learn about Caltrans' new interest in partnerships, public participation, and context - sensitive solutions. Come and welcome the revelation. - Session 105, Monday, 10:45 AM Participants: Brian Smith, Deputy Director of Planning and Modal Program, Caltrans District 5, San Luis Obispo; Gregg Albright, District 5 Director, Caltrans, San Luis Obispo. Celebrating California Places II- The Golden State in Song, Slogans & the Silver Screen (Sponsored by the California Planning Roundtabl) This is a new edition of the very clever program that premiered at the 2001 Conference in Sacramento. It's all about the images projected about the Golden State, its cities, its citizens, and its lifestyle. Dave Bess, known for serenading his Cal Poly classes with municipal melodies, will debut some newly discovered tunes and screen a new music video. He'll also present some old favorites like Bank, Bank, Bank, We Bank on Burbank, The Girls Are Prettier in Whittier, and Brawley, the World's Largest City Beneath the Level of the Sea. Jim Clapp will preview his new book on the American city in cinema and focus on California's role as a movie icon. Ric Stephens will offer epithets and epitaphs --a survey of the one- liners that California boosters have used to tout their communities. Audience participation is strongly encouraged and - at this very moment - some planners are being persuaded to present songs and slogans they've uncovered since last year's conference. - Session 107, Tuesday, 3:15 PM Participants: Vivian Kahn, FAICP, Principal, Kahn/Mortimer/Associates, Oakland, CA; David E. Bess, Ph.D., FAICP, Professor of Urban Planning, Cal Poly Pomona, San Luis Obispo, CA; James A. Clapp, PhD, Professor of Urban Planning, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA; Ric Stephens, FAICP, Planning Director, The AEI-CASC Companies, Colton, CA. Converting Strip Malls into Suburban Villages Where do you look to increase intensity in built -out cities and suburbs? One Smart Growth principle that shows great Welcome to Ylanlliego Page 3 of 12 promise is the reuse and reinvention of underutilized commercial centers. The potential exists to turn some into vibrant, mixed -use suburban villages. When successfully converted, these strip malls present an opportunity for communities to halt sprawl and reinforce community identity. Converting Strip Malls into Suburban Villages will consider national and Southern California case studies, and use them to help understand the issues that planners, elected officials, owners, developers, and public agencies face in undertaking these transformative projects. - Session 108, Monday, 3:15 PM Participants: Melani Smith, Director of Govemmental Services, The Planning Center, Costa Mesa, CA; Randal W. Jackson, ASLA, President, The Planning Center, Costa Mesa, CA; William R. Anderson, AICP, Vice President, Economics Research Associates, San Diego, CA; John H. Tillotson, Jr., President/Partner, Pelican Center LLC, Huntington Beach, CA. Creating a High Density Version of the American Dream In the post-VWVII comedy, Mr. Blandings Builds His Dream House, a New York City dweller trades his family's city apartment for a single family farmhouse in Connecticut. More than 50 years later, the same powerful vision of homeownership means the Golden State is rapidly consuming developable and even marginally -developable land to provide detached single family homes. But are some important market forces changing? Can higher density, mixed -use living become a viable alternative to the enduring image of the American Dream? And if so, what form should new development take? Learn what the development community, both traditional builders and New Urbanists, are doing about California's single-family housing single-mindedness. - Session 109, Tuesday, 1:45 PM Participants: Julie A. Dercle, Ph.D., AICP, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, California State University, Northridge, CA; Stefanos Polyzoides, AIA, Principal, Moule & Polyzoides Architects, San Diego, CA; Michael Dieden is founder and president of Creative Housing Associates, LLC. Dealing with the Media The planning profession often overlooks, or at least underestimates, the value of effective public relations in better communicating and implementing work programs and strategies. In Dealing with the Media, a panel of media professionals identify the value of effective media/public relations strategies; provide a professional assessment of the do's and don'ts as they apply to planning; and suggest some public relations basics that will add value to any planning effort. - Session 110, Tuesday, 10:45 AM Participants: Michael McLaughlin, Director of Regional Planning, SANDAG, San Diego, CA; Gary Bonelli, Public Relations Director, SANDAG, San Diego, CA; Alan Ziegaus, President, Southwest Strategies, San Diego, CA; Tim McClain, Editor, Metropolitan Magazine, San Diego, CA. Defining Smart Growth Smart Growth has been defined in many different ways, depending which body is promoting it, and recently the American Planning Association adopted its version of a Smart Growth policy. Gaining an understanding of the issues behind this policy, and how Smart Growth initiatives can both benefit and impact a community in its future development, is essential for decision makers. Learn what Smart Growth means and what you need to consider in the implementation of Smart Growth principles. - Session 111, Tuesday, 3:15 PM Participants: Lorie Garcia, Region VI POAC member, American Planning Association, Planning Commissioner Representative, CCAPA Board; Chair, Historical Heritage Commission, County of Santa Clara; Planning Commissioner, City of Santa Clara; Diane Kane, PhD, AICP, Architectural Historian, Office of Environmental Planning, Caltrans, District 7, Los Angeles, CA; Tony Lettieri, FAICP, Planning Commissioner, City of San Diego, CA; Don Weden, Principal Planner, Planning Office, County of Santa Clara, CA. Dodging the Million Dollar Lawsuit: A Competition to Uncover Little Known Planning Laws Modeled after "Who Wants to be a Millionaire," this session tests attendees knowledge of California planning law and showers intelligent, aware, or just plain shrewd contestants with prizes galore ($100,000 candy bars, hats, and t shirts). Participants selected from the audience are called to take the hot seat and demonstrate their knowledge of important but often little-known California laws. Spectator involvement also comes when participants seek the audience's advice. During the competition, two judges will provide additional information on each of the questions. Dodging the Million Dollar Law Suit is an entertaining forum for identifying and discussing planning laws that, when overlooked, can cause serious trouble. - Session 112, Monday, 3:15 PM Participants: Jerry Blum, AICP, Planning Director, City of Ontario, Ontario, CA (Host); Marco A Martinez, AICP, JD. Public Law Department, Best Best & Krieger, LLP, Riverside, CA; Jaime L. Raymond, JD, Public Law Department, Best Best & Krieger LLP, Irvine, CA. Economics 101 for Planners n For planners who skipped class during that critical input/output lecture, regressed to the beach when regression analysis t. / 6 5 Welcome to Planlliego Page 4 of 12 was taught, or thought a project "penciled" when you ran out of erasers, this session is for you. It's also for planners who want to brush up on some basics of land economics. A panel of economic planning practitioners will explain the terminology of urban economics, the underpinnings of a regional economy, how developers determine project feasibility, and why planners should have a basic understanding of urban and real estate economics. Get comfortable with terms like "Industry Cluster" and "Multiplier Effect." Learn how net present value is calculated. Discover the difference between "Economic Impact" and "Fiscal Impact." - Session 113, Monday, 1:45 PM Participants: William Anderson, AICP, Vice President, Economics Research Associates, San Diego, CA; Paul Mara, Principal, Keyser Marston Associates, San Diego, CA; Erik Bruvold, Vice President, Public Policy and Director of Infrastructure Issues, San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation, San Diego, CA. Economics of High Profile Sporting Venues: If You Build It, Will They Really Come? Proposals for major sporting venues create difficult challenges for planners. Whether NBA/NHL arenas, major and minor league baseball stadiums, or collegiate sports centers, sporting venues generate excitement, identity, and controversy. In this session, panelists will discuss the economics of major sporting venues, how they are financed, how they can be leveraged to revitalize surrounding areas, their limitations as economic engines, what issues can be anticipated and, if your community is so inclined, how to plan one of your own. - Session 114, Tuesday at 9 AM Participants: Jeffrey N. Cohen, Director of Sports Facilities Consulting, Economics Research Associates, Los Angeles, CA; Fred Coons, Director of Business Development, NBBJ Sports & Entertainment, Marina Del Rey, CA; Walter Rask, Manager of Architecture and Planning, Centre City Development Corporation, San Diego, CA. Ethical Decision Making for Planning Commissioners How a commission makes its decisions is as important as what decisions it makes. Using ethics in the decision making process is more than just following the requirements of the Brown Act. Ethics are a set of standards which direct how we ought to act when we are at our best and which result in our actions being viewed as fair and impartial. Explore methods used by different entities to ensure ethical decision making in their communities and what issues need to be addressed in making ethical decisions. - Session 115, Tuesday, 9 AM Participants: Lorie Garcia, Region VI POAC member, American Planning Association; Planning Commissioner Representative, CCAPA Board; Planning Commissioner, City of Santa Clara; Jim Bruno, Planning Commissioner, City of Thousand Oaks; Geof Goodfellow, Director of Planning and Inspection, City of Santa Clara; Tony Lettieri, FAICP, Planning Commissioner, City of San Diego. Focused Zoning for Smart Growth (Sponsored by the Congress for the New Urbanism and the California Planning Roundtable) Absent careful, vigilant, and politically courageous administration, conventional zoning codes can be agents of sprawl. Comprehensive code revisions - which respond to a range of community concerns and which can incorporate New Urbanist and smart growth principles - are often huge, lengthy, expensive, and politically -charged enterprises. As an alternative, focused revisions to existing codes can implement many New Urbanist and smart growth principles in a far more efficient approach. Explore how the enhanced urban design orientation of New Urbanist code provisions can address public concerns about compact urban form and increased density. Review specific examples of California communities and their zoning codes that have pursued the principles of smart growth and New Urbanism. Zoning for Smart Growth also includes a report by the Congress for New Urbanism on effective approaches to code revisions. - Session 116, Tuesday, 10:45 AM Participants: Paul Crawford, FAICP , Crawford Multari & Clark Associates, San Luis Obispo, CA (Moderator); Stefanos Polyzoides, Principal, Moule & Polyzoides Architects; Stephen Lawton, Community Development Director, City of Hercules, CA; Ellen Greenberg, AICP , Director of Research, Congress for the New Urbanism. General Plan Guidelines: OPR's 2002 Update It's likely you already know that OPR's General Plan Guidelines provide guidance in the preparation of their general plans. What you may not know is that the Guidelines, which had their last revision in 1998, are currently being updated to reflect changes in state planning law, including case law and Attorney General Opinions. The 2002 Guidelines will identify how cities and counties can incorporate environmental justice into their general plans (per AB 1553), and will include expanded sections on public participation, implementation, and energy planning. OPR planners will present the draft guidelines, highlight key changes, and solicit input from workshop attendees. All those attending the workshop will receive copies of the draft guidelines. - Session 117, Monday, 1:45 PM Participants: Terry Roberts, Director of the State Clearinghouse in the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR), Sacramento, CA; Brian Grattidge, Associate Planner with the Governor's Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse Unit, Sacramento, CA. 06 Welcome to PlanDiego Page 5 of 12 Getting Along in the Halls of State & Federal Government At the National and California levels, APA engages in legislative advocacy on behalf of key planning issues. Of course, advocacy requires legislative know-how, subtlety, and a keen understanding of how things get done in Congress, the State Assembly, and the State Senate. Learn how policies and strategies are developed, and how APA gets its message across. Hear about the step-by-step process of getting legislation passed and, often more importantly, how behind -the - scene efforts really make a difference. This is a session in which experts in the art of politics discuss approaches and techniques that advance planning and associated legislative issues. Session 118, Tuesday, 3:15 PM Participants: Jeff Lambert, AICP, Califomia Chapter President, Director of Planning and Building Services, City of Santa Clarity, CA; Jason Jordon, National APA Govemment Relations, Washington, D.C.; Sande George, Executive Director and Lobbyist, CCAPA, Sacramento, CA. Got Culcha? - Planning and Art Collaboration (Sponsored by the California Planning Roundtable) Art collaboration in city planning is a long overlooked component in planning, often equated with the bygone City Beautiful Movement. Yet art collaboration offers unique opportunities for cities to establish a sense of place and feeling of community. Luckily, across the country - and very clearly in California - there's been a resurgence in cultural interest combined with urban design. Many California cities have incorporated cultural elements in their overall planning, some calling for public art, others establishing arts commissions, and still others creating cultural districts. Getting Culcha is a bringing together of artists as well as experts in cultural planning, public art, and art event programming to profile case studies where communities successfully developed cultural projects and programs. - Session 119, Monday, 3:15 PM Participants: Participants (Partial List): Richard Stephens, AEI-CASC Companies, Colton, CA 92324; Wayne G. Griffin, President and CEO of the Catalina Island Chamber of Commerce & Visitors Bureau, Catalina, CA. Grading 101 In this very short course in the fundamentals of grading, participants will hit the ground running as they learn how to read a grading map, then understand the relevance of balancing, contour grading, daylighting, and other essentials. This fast paced condensed version of a longer program is also an entertaining and engaging session that provides keen insight into what for many is the rote evaluation of grading plans. Along the way, view a collection of egregious examples of Great Grading Gaffes. - Session 120, Tuesday, 1:45 PM Participants: Steve Estrada, FASLA, Estrada Land Planning, San Diego, CA. Humor in Planning After a hiatus of several years, the "Humor in Planning" folks are back to show the lighter side of the planning profession. Ron Pflugrath and Mark Brodeur have assembled new examples of curious design in their presentation, "Projects from Hell II -Welcome to Buttuglyville." Ron and Mark act as guides for a field trip to planning nightmares around the country. Marvin Roos will explain, "What they really mean when they say...," picking examples from his rich collection of planning quotes and mis-speaks. Finally, Ric Stephens showcases "Plannerese," the skewed and skewered perspective of some planners. Attendees will never see their profession the same way again, and probably be all the better for it! - Session 121, Tuesday, 3:15 PM Participants: Ric Stephens, AEI-CASC Companies, Colton, CA; Marvin Roos, AICP, Director of Planning Services, Mainiero, Smith and Associates, Palm Springs, CA; Ron Pflugrath, Senior Associate and Director of Planning Programs, RBF Consulting; Mark Brodeur, Principal, RRM Design Group. Implementing Successful Infill Development California planners are currently challenged with the realities of implementing infill development, including neighborhood opposition, land assembly, clean-up costs, aging infrastructure, regulatory requirements, and financing complexities. This session is designed to provide insights on implementing successful infill development by five panelists, each of whom approaches the process from a slightly different perspective. In addition, the results of a survey taken by developers and planners will provide some pertinent divergence about the expectations and challenges of infill. - Session 122, Monday, 10:45 AM Participants: Marta 0. Self, AICP, Vice President(Principal Planner, McGill Martin Self, Inc., Walnut Creek, CA; Elizabeth West, Senior Consultant, Office of State Senator Tom Torkalson, Sacramento, CA; Joel Keller, President Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Board,; Patricia McGowan, Planner IV, City of Oakland, CA, Rich Bottarini, Director of Community Development, City of Pleasant Hill, CA; Tony Pauker, Director of Development, The Olsen Company, San Diego, CA. Interdisciplinary Planning: An Inside Retrospective on the Riverside County Integrated Project Much has been written regarding the ambitious and multifaceted Riverside County Integrated Project (RICP), including "California's Inland Empire Strikes Back," in the February 2002 issue of Planning. However, little has been expressed by 0�J3 96 Welcome to P1anDiego Page 6 of 12 those who prepared the plans - and the RCIP consultant team is anxious to share insights and strategies for other regional planning efforts. Interdisciplinary Planning provides an opportunity to understand some of the critical steps in developing a successful regional, interdisciplinary planning program and how to address (or avoid) the political, social, and environmental hurdles associated with such major undertakings. - Session 123, Tuesday, 9 AM Participants: Dick Ramella, Principal, The Planning Center, Costa Mesa, CA; June Collins, Principal, Dudek and Associates, Encinitas, CA; Rob McCann, President, LSA Associates, Inc., Irvine, CA; Brian Judd, The Planning Center, Costa Mesa, CA Landscape -Based Urban Design: Sometimes, Success Means You Can't See the Planning for the Trees Landscape -driven urban design offers solutions for core, suburban, infill and redevelopment settings. Learn about three different situations which have surprisingly common threads: Urban design within a strip commercial setting, where landscape -based urban planning created a framework that knit together a diverse suburban/strip commercial area in the Stockton/Broadway Corridor; urban design in an institutional setting, where at Grant High School and Marysville Boulevard, a planning process empowered under -represented people; and urban design within a small town, where landscape -based planning helped the city of West Sacramento achieve its redevelopment goals at River Walk Park. - Session 124, Monday, 3:15 PM Participants: Jeffrey Thomas Craft, ASLA, Senior Associate, The HLA Group, Sacramento, CA; Val Toppenberg, Director of Redevelopment and Housing, City of West Sacramento, CA; John H. Nicolaus, ASLA, Principal, The HLA Group, Sacramento, CA; Christine A. Anderson, ASLA, Senior Associate, The HLA Group, Sacramento, CA. Linking Water Supply and Urban Growth Since passage last year of Senate Bill 221, which requires a reliable water supply before subdivision approval, and Senate Bill 610, which requires water supply assessment for large projects and plans, land use and water resource planners have struggled to understand and implement the new regulations. In Linking Water Supply and Growth, a panel of experts will discuss the State's water supply issues and critically examines the new statutes. The panel will explain the legal implications of the new laws, identify planning and analytic tools available to answer water supply questions, and describe the new Guidebook developed by the State Department of Water Resources and OPR to help planners implement SB 221 and 610. - Session 125, Tuesday, 9 AM Participants: Jeff Loux, Ph.D., Director, Land Use and Natural Resources Program, U.C. Davis Extension, Davis, CA; Albert I. Herson, JD, FAICP, Vice President, SAIC, Sacramento; Jonas Minton, Deputy Director of the California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento. Managing for Results: Training Strategies and Organizational Development for Planning Agencies Challenges abound in managing public planning agencies. Financial resources are typically limited, demands for service are high, and staff retention remains a formidable task. In Managing for Results, four experienced planning managers talk candidly about traditional and non-traditional methods for dealing with some of today's issues. Paul Zucker will provide an overview of performance audits. Bob Leiter will describe the "strategic business plan," an approach involving management structure, internal business systems, and employee work environment. Sandra Holder will illustrate how to organize and manage multiple planning and development service functions within a single department. And Charles Grimm will explain the City of Escondido's innovative in-house training program that's generated major improvements in organizational effectiveness. - Session 126, Tuesday, 1:45 PM Participants: Paul Zucker, FAICP, Zucker Systems, San Diego, CA; Robert Leiter, AICP, Director of Planning and Building, City of Chula Vista, CA; Sandra Holder, Director of Community Development, City of Carlsbad, CA; Charles Grimm, Director of Planning and Building, City of Escondido, CA. Mariposa County General Plan: Building Backwards Regardless of the months and sometimes years spent in creating or updating a general plan, the document may end up in front of elected officials who find adoption impossible. The reasons are many and familiar: controversial topics, policies that are at odds with past actions, high cost, inability to enforce, and so on. In an innovative approach to general plan development, Mariposa County developed a "communications loop" that allowed elected officials to express their concerns and inclinations at the beginning of the process. In effect, the Board set a line in the sand on key issues before the detailed process began. As a result, the officials who eventually had to adopt the plan, as well as the public agency staff and the public, understood policies and attitudes of those officials early enough to influence the direction of the plan.. The lesson for Mariposa County and the process to be described in this session is: front-end buy -off makes for back -end adoption. - Session 127, Monday, 10:45 AM Participants: Eric Jay To//, Director, Mariposa County Planning Department, Mariposa, CA; Anders J. Hauge, Vice- President/Westem Regional Manager, Parsons Harland Bartholomew and Associates, Inc; Jeffrey M. Goldman, Principle Planner. Parsons Harland Bartholomew and Associates, Inc; Robert Pickard, Supervisor, District IV, Mariposa County, CA. 0 6(9 U�`3 Welcome to P1anDiego Page 7 of 12 Matching Transit and Land Use Identifying which types of transit are best suited to which types of land use has been the focus of a first phase general plan update in the City of San Diego. With a goal of dramatically increasing both transit ridership and walking in a predominantly automobile -oriented city, the City of San Diego and the Metropolitan Transit Development Board are jointly working on a "City of Villages" strategy and a "Transit First" plan. Both are aimed at creating pedestrian -friendly villages served by a world -class transit network. Matching Transit and Land Use will offer a fresh perspective on designing appropriate transit systems for different urban forms, provide a description of the transit/land use strategy in San Diego, and discuss the interagency and interdisciplinary approach necessary to craft transit/land use strategies and implementation measures. - Session 128, Monday, 1:45 PM Participants: Gary Halbert, Chief Deputy Planning Director, City of San Diego, CA; Alan Hoffman, Principal, The Mission Group, San Diego, CA; Nancy Bragado, Senior Planner, City of San Diego, CA; Dave Schumacher, Project Manager for Implementation, Metropolitan Transit Development Board, San Diego, CA. Mediation Skills for Planners Planners are often put in circumstances where they're supposed to mediate between opposing positions. But exactly how do you mediate? Now is the time to find out. Senior personnel from the largest provider of alternative dispute resolution services in the San Diego Region will present an interactive workshop designed to inform and instruct about the nature of mediation and its application to planning. How mediation works as a conflict resolution techniques will be explained and demonstrated. Included will be the value and use of non -inflammatory language, techniques for promoting understanding among disputants as a precondition to reaching agreement, and information on how to ask the proper questions. Strategies used by successful mediators and negotiators will be demonstrated discussed. - Session 129, Monday, 10:45 AM, and Tuesday, 9 AM Participants: Barbara Filner, Director of the Training Institute, San Diego Mediation Center, San Diego, CA; or Robin Duboe Seigle, J.D., Mediation Administrator, San Diego Mediation Center, San Diego, CA. Negotiating Effectively Among Planning Agencies, Citizen Groups, and Developers Negotiations over real estate development proposals are often complex and contentious, with representatives of competing interests - including public agencies - commonly in conflict over the merits of land use proposals. The panel for Negotiating Effectively is made up of individuals often perceived as being at odds with one another: a local planning official, a development industry representative, and a community activist. Together they'll discuss means and methods for improving the quality and effectiveness of negotiations around development proposals. Learn how to: address the expectations of the parties to the negotiations; identify and respond to common concerns and mistakes which interfere with smooth negotiations; and build and maintain good faith and trust among participants, even in the course of sharp but principled disagreements. Issues will be discussed in the context of mixed use, high -density projects in urban centers, new suburban master -planned communities, and small-scale projects in less developed area. - Session 130, Monday, 3:15 PM Participants: Patricia Butler, former member of the City of San Diego Planning Commission, President of BRG Consulting, San Diego, CA; Cary Lowe, Ph.D., J.D., Partner, Jenkens & Gilchrist, Pasadena, CA; Michael Beck, San Diego County Planning Commission, Director of the San Diego Chapter of the Endangered Habitat League, San Diego, CA. Placemaking on a Budget Elaborate urban design projects are not the only way to make great things happen in your community. Small projects which effectively tap local values, heritage, and environment are essential to effective placemaking. Using examples from smaller communities in the West, Placemaking on a Budget describes how to develop affordable and implementable urban design vision plans and projects. Direction will be provided on how to strategically select projects, access grants, leverage private investment, and incorporate local volunteer assistance into the ongoing planning processes and project implementation. - Session 131, Monday, 1:45 PM Participants: Susan Jackson, AICP, Principal Community Planner, RBF Consulting's Urban Design Studio, Irvine, CA; Al Zelinka, AICP, Principal Community Planner, RBF Consulting's Urban Design Studio, Irvine, CA. Planning History: Student Research Papers Looking forward by looking back, students in the Urban Studies Programs, California State University Northridge (CSUN) will present planning history papers based on research using CCAPA. Preparation of the papers are under the direction of Dr. Tim Dagodaag, Chair.of the Urban Studies Program and are the result of the 1998 agreement between CCAPA and CSUN providing CSUN students the opportunity to prepare papers or exhibits each year for the CCAPA Conference. The 2,000 pieces of CCAPA planning history are housed in the state-of-the-art facility built after the Northridge n 6 n Earthquake. - Session 133, Tuesday, 10:45 AM :l Welcome to PlanDiego Page 8 of 12 Participants: Betty Croly, FAICP, CCAPA Historian; CSUN students. Planning and the Digital World: Making the Most of Planning Outreach (Sponsored by the California Planning Roundtable ) The World Wide Web and related digital technologies offer the promise of greater public involvement in the planning process through interactive forums, simulation and modeling, and information dispersal. This nuts and bolts session will look at ways that various public agencies have used technology to feed the community appetite for planning information, to engage residents in dialog on planning issues, and inform the public prior to meetings and hearings. Panelists will describe the technological tools they used in specific projects or as part of an interactive information system; their successes and shortcomings; and their general application to other agencies or projects. - Session 132, Tuesday, 3:15 PM Participants: Mike Moore, Community Development Director, City of Petaluma, CA; Judy Rambeau, Assistant to the City Manager for Community Relations, City of Santa Monica, CA; Keith Kurtz, Internet Systems Coordinator, City of Santa Monica, CA; David Early, President, Design, Community, and Environment, Berkeley, CA; Michael Smith, Regional Planner, Association of Bay Area Governments, Oakland, CA. Preserving California Agriculture What can planners and elected officials do to keep agriculture in California? Is effective agricultural land mitigation a fantasy, or can it be a reality? Every day, Californians are faced with tough choices in their efforts to balance the state's inevitable growth with the protection of agricultural resources. This session will explore the tools, techniques, and mitigation programs currently in use by various jurisdictions (e.g., mandatory mitigations, citizen initiative -based approval requirements, and LAFCO-administered annexation requirements), and discuss the pros, cons, and consequences of each - including some of the unintended consequences. The session also includes an overview of trends in agricultural land conversion, and a discussion of policies necessary to support meaningful agricultural land protection. - Session 134, Tuesday, 10:45 AM Participants: Holly King, Agricultural Programs Manager, Great Valley Center, (Moderator),- Julie Bulla, Senior Planner, Ventura County Agricultural Commissioner's Office; Stephen Hammond, Director of Planning, Wallace Roberts & Todd, San Francisco, CA; John McCaull is the California Regional Director for the American Farmland Trust Preserving and Restoring Property -Owner Views Who owns the view? Some cities legislate, some mediate, and some stay silent. In November 1989, the voters of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes passed Proposition M, establishing the right of property owners to a view. In response, the City created a View Restoration Commission, and established guidelines and procedures to ensure the preservation and restoration of protected views where foliage was involved. Since inception, the ordinance has survived two legal challenges. In one of those rulings, the court determined that the ordinance was not an unlawful exercise of the City's police power, that it did not constitute a taking of private property without just compensation, and that it did not deprive an individual of due process. Preserving and Restoring Property Owner Views will describe the Rancho Palo Verdes ordinance, the enforcement process, and the legal issues involved. It will also consider ordinances in other coastal communities which take a different approach, most notably the cities of Solana Beach and Del Mar. Attendees will participate in a mock View Restoration Hearing. - Session 134, Tuesday, 10:45 AM Participants: Trayci A. Nelson, Senior View Restoration Coordinator, City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CA; Joel Rojas, AICP , Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement, City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CA; Carol W. Lynch City Attorney, Richards, Watson & Gershon, Los Angeles, CA. Property Rights, Takings, and Exactions The world of property rights, takings, and exactions continues to evolve. The past year has been another active one, including a U.S. Supreme Court decision on whether development moratoria are takings, a California Supreme case on impact fees, and a California Court of Appeal decision on inclusionary housing requirements. In this session, a panel will look at these new rulings and, as a practical matter, discuss how they effect planning. It will also look at APA's role in these areas, including the organization's response to ongoing efforts around the country to enact legislation enhancing private property rights. - Session 136, Tuesday, 10:45 AM Participants: Thomas Jacobson, JD, AICP, Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Studies and Planning, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA; Daniel J. Curtin, Jr., JD, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, Walnut Creek, CA; Vivian Kahn, FAICP, Principal, Kahn/Mortimer/Associates, Oakland, CA; Thomas Brown, City Attorney, City of Napa, CA. Public Speaking: Developing Skill and Confidence The admonition from Alice in Wonderland still applies: Say what you mean and mean what you say. Of course, that's 1n Welcome to Planlliego Page 9 of 12 easier said than in the public arena - though now comes an opportunity to hone your skills. In this abbreviated version of her course in public presentations, speech counselor Jenni Prisk will teach the basics of developing a message, delivering a presentation with polish and ease, and engaging an audience. Along the way, she'll show how to be animated in delivery and provide pointers on changing style to change results. Public Speaking is filled with down-to- earth practical information and is directed both to novices as well as to those who want a refresher on how to capture the hearts and minds of their audience without provoking a panic attack. Public Speaking is a rare opportunity to pick up valuable advice from an expert in interpersonal communication. - Session 137, Monday, 1:45 PM Participants: Jenni Prisk, President, Prisk Communication, San Diego, CA. Raising the CEQA Bar Even without changes to CEQA or the Guidelines, many CEQA practitioners have begun to notice what they see as a legal trend, especially at the trial court level: Courts are requiring more and more information to meet the evidentiary requirements imposed by CEQA. Moreover, increased sophistication and the amount of evidence in one case raises the standards for all others that follow. In effect, every successful EIR raises the CEQA bar for every EIR that follows. Several experienced CEQA attorneys and EIR consultants will discuss whether this perception is the reality and what it means for the environmental review process. - Session 138, Monday, 10:45 PM Participants: Bradly Torgan, JD, Partner, Nossaman, Gunther, Knox & Elliott, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Michelle Ouellette, JD, Partner, Best Best & Krieger; Carollyn Lobell, JD, Nossaman, Gunther, Knox & Elliott, LLP, Irvine, CA; Thomas Worthington, Principal, Impact Sciences Regulating McMansipns One result of rising property values is that lots once thought suitable for cottages are sprouting huge new houses. Though homes may be out of proportion with the existing community or out of scale with the site itself, they typically comply with zoning. The "mansionization" phenomenon can be especially hard on the people next door: privacy in backyards and even the interior of the home may be compromised, and sunlight is diminished. What's more, demand for on -street parking rises dramatically. So what's the response? Regulating McMansions describes various approaches, their advantages and disadvantages, and promising solutions. Samples from ordinances and guidelines will be made available.- Session 139, Tuesday, 1:45 PM Participants: Mark Brodeur, FIUD, Principal, RRM Design Group, San Juan Capistrano, CA; Hank Skokowski, AICP, Principal, Urban Design Studio, West Palm Beach, FL; and Allan Rigg, P.E., Director of Public Works and Planning for the City of Palos Verdes Estates, CA. Restoration of Waterfront Brownfields However much we talk about treasuring California's water resources, there are creeks, rivers, and oceanfront areas around the state that have been neglected or degraded over time. Restoration of Waterfront Brownfields looks at several specific instances of polluted environments and shows how significant subsurface contamination actually led to successful waterfront revitalization projects. Strategies used at San Luis Obispo's Avila Beach, in Downtown Santa Rosa, and in Sacramento will be explored for pitfalls, lessons learned, and the turning points that made a difference. - Session 140, Tuesday, 1:45 PM Participants: T. Keith Gurnee, Principal, RRM Design Group, Healdsburg, CA (Moderator); Mike Sheppard, Senior Planner, City of Santa Rosa, CA; Debbie Lagomarcino Rudd, AICP, Associate, RRM Design Group, Healdsburg, CA. Room to Roam: San Diego's Program to Preserve Open Space at a Time of Increased Growth and Development As communities seek to expand their tax base during tough economic times, the usual priority is buildings first, open space second. Often the result is that native plants and animals are squeezed into disconnected scraps of open space, making long-term survival of indigenous flora and fauna debatable. San Diego has sought to end this fragmentation by creating a regional open space preserve that links habitat systems over the entire San Diego region. This broad and bold program has been in effect for several years, and it continues to be complex and controversial. Room to Roam brings together a panel of stakeholders to talk frankly about the pros and cons of the multi -jurisdictional, multiple species habitat conservation programs. Expect some contention as advocates and critics discuss how best to protect habitat in high growth areas. - Session 141, Monday, 10:45 PM Participants: Janet Fairbanks, AICP, Project Manager for the Multiple Habitat Conservation Program, San Diego Association of Governments, San Diego, CA; Keith Greer, Program Manger for the Multiple Species Conservation Program, City of San Diego, CA; James Whalen, President, J. Whalen Associates; David Hogan, Program Coordinator, Center for Biological Diversity; Michael Beck, Director, San Diego Chapter of the Endangered Habitats League, San Diego, CA. Room to Roam: San Diego's Program to Preserve Open Space at a Time of Increased Growth and Development f ') 71 Welcome to PlanDiego Page 10 of 12 As communities seek to expand their tax base during tough economic times, the usual priority is buildings first, open space second. Often the result is that native plants and animals are squeezed into disconnected scraps of open space, making long-term survival of indigenous flora and fauna debatable. San Diego has sought to end this fragmentation by creating a regional open space preserve that links habitat systems over the entire San Diego region. This broad and bold program has been in effect for several years, and it continues to be complex and controversial. Room to Roam brings together a panel of stakeholders to talk frankly about the pros and cons of the multi -jurisdictional, multiple species habitat conservation programs. Expect some contention as advocates and critics discuss how best to protect habitat in high growth areas. - Session 141, Monday, 10:45 PM Participants: Janet Fairbanks, AICP, Project Manager for the Multiple Habitat Conservation Program, San Diego Association of Governments, San Diego, CA; Keith Greer, Program Manger for the Multiple Species Conservation Program, City of San Diego, CA; James Whalen, President, J. Whalen Associates, David Hogan, Program Coordinator, Center for Biological Diversity; Michael Beck, Director, San Diego Chapter of the Endangered Habitats League, San Diego, CA. Social Capital, Civic Engagement, and the Power of Planning When Robert Putnam published Bowling Alone in 2000, he brought a new word into America's everyday vocabulary: social capital. Putnam's contention was that we are increasingly disconnected from family, friends, neighbors, and civic institutions. Now, continuing research indicates that land use planning has a startling and profound affect on the creation - or erosion - of social capital. In this session, Professor Kevin Leyden presents recent research that examines whether some types of neighborhoods are better generators of social capital than others. His investigation compares attitudes of people living in traditional, mixed -use, pedestrian oriented neighborhoods with those living in modern auto -dependent suburbs. The implications for planning are both dramatic and enlightening. - Session 142, Monday, 10:45 AM Participants: Participant: Kevin M. Leyden, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Political Science, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV Surveying Smart Growth Zoning Codes Presented by the Local Government Commission Are our neighborhoods made memorable by our front doors or our garage doors? Communities throughout North America are calling for development that creates human -scale neighborhoods and not garage-scape subdivisions. Unfortunately, many local government zoning codes actually stand in the way of the type of development that residents want. Based on research of more than 150 zoning codes from coast to coast, the Local Government Commission has produced a handbook for planners and local governments on designing zoning codes that encourage smart growth development. Participants will be provided strategies on ways to make a zoning code that is friendly to smart growth, using models from California and throughout the country. - Session 143, Tuesday, 1:45 PM Participants: Steve Hoyt, Project Manager, Local Government Commission, Sacramento, CA; Steve Tracy, Senior Research Associate, Local Government Commission, Sacramento, CA. The Sierra Is Still In Danger: A Continuing Calling For Action (Sponsored by the California Planning Roundtable and the California Planning Foundation) At the 2000 CCAPA Conference, a call to action was sent out to protect the Sierra Nevada. Rural sprawl was not only taxing recreation lands, it was also threatening affordable housing, wildlife corridors, and natural resources with consequences as grave to conversation values as urban sprawl. At the 2001 Conference, strategies to protect the Sierra were presented to planners, elected officials, interest -based organizations, businesses, and residents. This year, at the 2002 CCAPA Conference, the focus will be on translating strategies into policies at the regional and local levels. Specifically, the discussion will be on: how to have effective public involvement in a large rural area; why the council of governments was disbanded and should it be brought back; how to sustain economies in rural areas; how to maintain community character in the face of changing economics; and how to return natural resource investments back to the community. - Session 144, Monday, 1:45 PM Participants: Janet Fairbanks, AICP, California Planning Roundtable, SANDAG, San Diego, CA; Chuck Thistlethwaite, Planning Director, County of Inyo. CA; Andrea Lawrence, former Supervisor, Mono County Board of Supervisors; Darrin Dinsmore, Sierra Business Council; Scott Bums, Community Development Director, Mono County, CA; Brian Peters, Planning Director, Alpine County, CA. Urban Design for Planners Intended for planners who want to understand how urban designers look at cities, neighborhoods, and buildings, Urban Design for Planners is also directed to those want to improve the urban design of their own communities. In the first part of this session, the fundamentals of urban design will be presented using examples from California and elsewhere. Panelists will discuss how urban design principles are typically implemented and will speak to the effectiveness of the process. In the second half of the session, both the audience and a mock Design Review Board will evaluate an actual project. Panelists will critique the project, after which audience members will have a chance to ask the experts (and ,, critique the critics). Participants will come away with: new ideas about basic urban design principles, ways of looking at �: 13 Welcome to Planlliego Page 11 of 12 the built environment, and insight into the design review process. - Session 145, Monday, 3:15 PM Participants: Diana Painter, Principal, Diana J. Painter, Petaluma, CA; Pedro Francisco Arce, Director of Permit Review, City of San Francisco, CA; Mark Hinshaw, Director of Urban Design, LMN Architects, Seattle, WA; Rob Quigley, Principal, Rob Wellington Quiqley FAIA, San Diego and Palo Alto, CA. Web Conferencing for Planners Web conferencing, i.e., using the Internet to connect people for meetings and presentations, is commonly used in business because it allows remote participation and online learning. But web conferencing for planning purposes is still in its infancy. For the planning profession, obvious web conferencing applications include Planning Commission or City Council work sessions, public workshops, and focused group meetings. Web Conferencing for Planners provides an explanation of the technology, an overview of the strengths and weaknesses of the approach, and through an actual interactive "Family Feud" game, session attendees will learn how to communicate in real-time through live interactive means. - Session 146, Tuesday, 10:45 AM Participants: Lane Yago, Technology -to -Business Applications Specialist, Jones & Stokes, Sacramento, CA; Janet Barbieri, Public Information Specialist, Jones & Stokes, Sacramento, CA; Maggie Townsley, Principal Environmental Planner, Jones & Stokes, Sacramento, CA. Wireless Facilities: A Guide to Evaluating Permit Applications However welcome cell phones and other wireless devices are, wireless communication infrastructure often produce controversy and pose real community problems. Yet they can also generate imaginary issues that draw as much attention as the real ones. Wireless Facilities: A Guide to Evaluating Permit Applications provides a road map for negotiating the curves and obstacles of the wireless world. It begins with an overview of the wireless industry, describes current technology and future trends, identifies typical issues in permitting, and catalogues the various issues and approaches used by local planning agencies when evaluating wireless communication facilities. Examples will be provided of both successful and not -so -successful processes. - Session 147, Tuesday, 3:15 PM Participants: Lauren Lajoie, Project Manager, Morro Group, Inc., San Luis Obispo, CA (Moderator); Gordon Bell, Bell and Associates, Santa Barbara, CA, Kelly Heffemon, Community Development, City of Arroyo Grande, CA; Shawna Scott, Morro Group, Inc., San Luis Obispo, CA. 073 c_;+ 14 T4'yl 4 4Qur«rw COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: ITEM TITLE: July 16, 2002 Authorization for Overnight Travel for the Finance Director and Two Members of the Investment Advisory Board to Attend the 2002 Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Conference September 12 — 13, 2002 in Sacramento, California RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Finance Director and two Members of the Investment Advisory Board to attend the 2002 Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Conference September 12 — 13, 2002 in Sacramento, California. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The Annual Local Agency Investment Fund Conference will be held September 12 -13, 2002 in Sacramento. Account No. 101-151-637-000 Travel and Training contains $2,500.00 for two Investment Advisory Board Members and one staff to attend this conference. The LAIF 2002 Annual Conference is a 2-day conference that focuses on financial issues affecting local governments and the investment pool. A preliminary conference schedule is attached (Attachment 1). FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: Alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Finance Director and two Members of the Investment Advisory Board to attend the LAIF Conference in Sacramento, California, September 12 - 13, 2002; or 2. Do not approve authorization for overnight travel for the Finance Director and two Members of the Investment Advisory Board to attend the LAIF Conference in Sacramento, California, September 12 - 13, 2002; or 074 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, . Falconer,/Finance Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment 1 : LAIF Conference Information (17 �i 0042 ATTACHMENT 1 INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD Business Session: D Meeting Date: September 2002 TITLE: LAIF Conference — Sacramento, CA September 12 & 13, 2002 BACKGROUND: The LAIF Conference Agenda has not been printed yet but will be held in Sacramento, California on September 12t' and 13th The tentative agenda is as follows: September 12: 9:00 a.m. Opening remarks Economics Outlook Current legislative issues for local government investments Lunch with the State Treasurer Credit issues by FITCH Auditors role — KMPG 3:30 p.m. Wrap—up September 13: 7:00 a.m. Tour of LAIF Offices and watch trading activities 9:00 a.m. Wrap-up RECOMMENDATION: Select u[) to two Board members to attend the LAIF Conference. J1hh M. Falconer, Finance Director n 7 r, 064 T4'yl 4 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Denial of Claim for Damages Filed by Angela Quintana - Date of Loss: May 9, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: -k STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Deny the Claim for Damages filed by Angela Quintana, with a reported date of loss of May 9, 2002. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The total amount of the claim was $658.95. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: A claim was filed by Angela Quintana, with a reported date of loss of May 9, 2002 (Attachment 1). It was forwarded to Carl Warren & Co., the City's claims administrator. Carl Warren & Co. recommended that the City Council deny the claim (Attachment 2). Correspondence was sent to Ms. Quintana on June 18, 2002, by Carl Warren & Co. outlining their recommendation to the City (Attachment 3). FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: Deny the Claim for Damages filed by Angela Quintana, with a reported date of loss of May 9, 2002; or 2. Accept the claim, or some portion thereof; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. 077 Respectfully submitted, Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Angela Quintana Claim for Damages 2. Letter from Carl Warren & Co. 3. Letter from Carl Warren & Co. to Angela Quintana 002 ATTACHMENT 1 FILE WITH: CLAIM FOR DAMAGES CITY CLERK'S OFFICE City of La Quinta TO PERSON OR PROPERTY P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 INSTRUCTIONS 1. Claims for death, injury to person or to personal property must be filed not later than six months after the occurrence. (Gov. Code § 911.2.) 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 year after the occurrence. (Gov. Code § 911.2.) 3. Read entire claim form before filing. 4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accident. 5. This claim form must be signed on page 2 at bottom. 6. Attach separate sheets, ifAecessary, to give full details. SIGN EA(,H SHEET. TO: [Name of City] Name of Claimant: Home Address of Claimant: '--Sz-!1-7 1� Business Address of Claimant,: ?,55, PG{-1 o W el � pp Give address and telephone number to Nhict regarding daim:: 7, -- f7? ;�XNE- tF- CLAIM P(i J CIT , �='FFICE Date of Birth of Clai ant: �� .- Occuaation of Claimant: Home TeleohoM of r and Sta Business Telephone o C!?imant: you desire notices or commu icatio to be sent Claimant's Social Security No.: (l 73 When did DA/ AGE or INJURY occur? Names of any city employees involved in INJURY or DAMAGE: Date: `> "�0 Z Time: Uc:>lyM. If Claim is for Equitable Indemnity, give date claimant served with the complaint: Date: Where did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Describe fully, and locate on diagram on reverse side of this sheet. Where appropriate, give street names and address and measurements from landmarks: Describe in detail how the DAMAGE or INJURY occurred. A 645 iAi A C94c-(4- aj T! 126- Why do you claim the city is responsible? �tIsheyies� (CJ/0D ON AveMLC- 57' C4a �jo OKuaJ � ON AOv �� Fa2c6� J C4 .s1-3 A- NORO 5pdrf 1T a fD iucGt �G►e�� 4u9_ 0c —� "x -�; , Describe in detail each INJURY or DAMAGE A.) µ eN E spo)4 l `6 K t O f 00f W kC(!,t` 8) j,,A '("EMz ra ?-ca C• Pr Clood r lct n6-- Q V 0 q bA Mk5 079 SEE PAGE 2 (OVER) THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE 16--, The amount claimed, as of the date of presentation of this claim, is computed as follows: Damages incurred to date (exact): Estimated prospective damages as far as known: Damage to property ..................... $ �� •`�� Future expenses for medical and hospital care Expenses for medical and hospital care ..... $ Future loss of earnings .................... $ - Loss of earnings ........................ $ Other prospective special damages ..........$ Special damages for ..................... $ _ -H—' _ Prospective general damages ..............$ Total estimated prospective damages .......$ �' General damages ...................... Total damages incurred to date .......... $ J�-' $ wtkL 9 501 , lv Total amount claimed as of date of presentation of this claim: $ / 5 $`WSJ 'ClA-6 (A (S?. `-S Was damage and/or injury investigated by ponce? M5 If so, what city? _ Were paramedics or ambulance called? 00 If so, name city or ambulance If injured, state date, time, name and address of doctor of your initial visit WITNESSES to DAMAGE or INJURY: List all persons and addresses of persons known to have information: Name Address Phone Name Address d to Phone Name Address kJ vPhone DOCTOR AND HOSPITALS: Hospital Doctor Doctor Address Phone Address Phone Address Phone READ CAREFULLY For all accidert claims place on following diagram name of streets, including North, accident by "A-1" and location of yourself or your vehicle at the time of the accident East, South, And West; indicate place of accident by "X" and by showing house by'B-1" and the point of impact by'X." numbers or distances to street corners. If City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A' location of City Vehicle when you first saw it, and by "S" location of yourself NOTE: If diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper diagram or your vehicle when you first saw City Vehicle; location of City vehicle at time of signed by claimant. IN bje$T or person filing on his behalf giving relationship Typed Name: Date: kC2&A Qv,- JCg1JA 6110 f OZ OSn NOTE: CLAIMS MUST BE FILED WITH CITY CLERK (Gov. Code § 915a.) Presentation of a false claim is a felony (Pen. Code § 72.) 005 f�� June 18, 2002 TO: The City of La Quinta ATTENTION: John Ruiz, Personnel Risk Manager RE: Claim Claimant D/Event Rec'd Y/Office Our File ATTACHMENT 2 Quintana vs. The City of La Quinta Angela Quintana 5/9/2002 6/ 10/2002 S-134005-DBK We have reviewed the above captioned claim and request that you take the action indicated below: CLAIM REJECTION: Send a standard rejection letter to the claimant. Please provide us with a copy of the notice sent, as requested above. If you have any questions please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, CARL WARREN & COMPANY Dwight J. Kunz cc: CJPIA w/enc. Attn.: Executive Director CARL WARREN & CO. CLAIMS MANAGEMENT- CLAIMS ADJUSTERS 750'I'hc Cite Drivc , Stc 400 Orangc, CA 92868 Mail: Y.O. Box 25180 - Santa Ana, Ca 92799-5180 Phone (714) 740-7999 1�xt. 140 - (800) 572-6900 - Fas: (714) 740-9412 () 81 00S 07 (13 %2002 15: 13 FAX 714 740 7992 CARL WARREN CO. ATTACHMENT 3 Angela Quintana 52-975 Ave Rubio La Quinta, CA 92253 June 27, 2002 RE: Principal CJP1A Member City La Quinta Claimant Angela Quintana D/hicident 05/09/02 Our File S 1340054DBK Dear Ms. Quintana.: As claim administrators for the self -insured City of La Quinta, we bane made a carefid examination of the circumstances sui-rounding the captioned occurrence and feel we have m enough evidence to make a decision on your claim. After evaluating the facts, we have reached the conclusion that our principal is not responsible for this occurrence. Wi, are sorry we are unable to recommend settlement of your claim to our principal. Our investigation reveals the contractor working in the area was, Colich and Sons, 547 West 14CP Street, Gardena, CA 90248-1509. We have sent a copy of your claim to them for consideration and requested they contact you direct with their decision. This letter does not affect the notice that will be sent to you by the City of La Quinta regarding disposition of your claim. Very truly yours, CARL WARREN & CO_ Deborah Been cc: City of La Quinta cc_ CTPIA CARL WARREN & CO& CLAIMS MANAGEMENT+CLAIMS ADJUSTERS 750 The City Drive • Suite 400 . orange, CA 92868 Mails P_O. Box 25180 • Santa Ana, C2 92799-5180 C(DPY Phone: (714) 740-7999• (800) 572-6900 ..Fax' C14) 740-9412 nR� rth.: 7 07-0�-02 15:09 RECEIVED FROM:714 740 7992 P.02 Tity/ 4 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE• Denial of Claim for Damages Filed by Wilfred Huerta - Date of Loss: January 1, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Deny the Claim for Damages filed by Wilfred Huerta, with a reported date of loss of January 1, 2002. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The total amount of the claim was not specified. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: A claim was filed by Wilfred Huerta, with a reported date of loss of January 1, 2002 (Attachment 1). It was forwarded to Carl Warren & Co.,the City's claims administrator. Carl Warren & Co. recommended that the City Council deny the claim (Attachment 2). Correspondence was sent to Mr. Huerta on July 2, 2002, by Carl Warren & Co. outlining their recommendation to the City (Attachment 3). FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: Deny the Claim for Damages filed by Wilfred Huerta, with a reported date of loss of January 1, 2002; or 2. Accept the claim, or some portion thereof; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. 083 Respectfully submitted, Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Wilfred Huerta Claim for Damages 2. Letter from Carl Warren & Co. 3. Letter from Carl Warren & Co. to Wilfred Huerta 04 002 ATTACHMENT 1 FILE WITH: CLAIM FOR DAMAGI City 6 Quints TO PERSON OR PROPERTY P.O.. Box1504 RECEIVED CLAIM N0. La Quinta, CA 92 ! ,, INSTRUCTIONS 1. Claims for death, injury to piffiA CIF td peraorral pr�bWM;At be filed not later than six months after the occurrence. (Gov. Cods §'§M.2q L r R~' S 0 F I C E 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than 1 year after the occurrence. (Gov. Code § 911.2.) 3. Read entire claim form before filing. 4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accident. 5. This claim form must be signed on page 2 at bottom. 6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. SIGN EACH SHEET. TO: (Name of City] v Date of Birth of Claimant ews Name of Cl ' ant Occupation of laiman 1 e ai Home Address of Claimant City and State Home Telephone of Claimant Business Address of Claimant City andState Business Telephone of Claimant Give address and telephone number to whidI you desire notices or communications to be sent Claimant's Social 86curity No.: regarding claim: `IV DkU'e- L10��IkfI4 ¢€7 71S" When did DAMAGE or III occur? Names of any city employees involved in tt'#MY or DAMAGE: Date: ,0 A Time: If Claim i for Equitable Indemnity, give date _ claimant served with the complaint J Date: Where did DAMAGE or MWRY occur? Describe fully. and locate on diagram nn rave.mp eirlp of this chapt whara onmmnrinta ntio ctroot nnmae and address and measurements from landmarks: Describe in detail how the DAMAGE or INJURY occurred. 4 O ef-v &e 09 Ile y &1Y �41e4-S, Co o-ve l Tiff 's , Po r fr`01 � �,.� c v -� ,'tip Td� T rRz G T � � �R6,v 7- a(- y� you 8' E i15tr 2lYR%/-t �Pu 14 h, i f O/�i rviQ /i�Gl� L1�x71� Why do you claim the city is responsible? Fe7;ycC'S�etT, e Cvo/zfr �l P va ,'ss� �'�R.�>r`f �f//dv d0 �4� rT�s 6e �O•vF c�u G�l�s� �rf fp,k i-r r �Z. T �e��ew-E 6e7�ve ear �c� l��srq/ S•`y , %, %�i��.r 1)tC /Y~ � ` S ~' /ATti7-Ree-rc/ r �� c?v p, /y/e�v � 1� �� Ce�Ter� tyre ,�rC/C�i Cl%/�',A10 lys� �fC>� (1� '�=1� AD CQmeut��GIS�`L scnbe In defail each INJURY or DAMAGE og 7�;l � 71-zO (T, / id�/uT dZc�e SOS r7i r s 10Rr> a-e GTE ,4o N6cv � /�4VX- (29,46fr TO C fre) t (2 r?Af. � A- tt,),' d040 S C 9,1 e /,- 7-1 085 2 (OVER) THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERS I �ff4 The amount claimed, as of the date of presentation of this claim, is computed as follows: Damages incurred to date (exact): Estimated prospective damages as far as known: Damage to property .......... I .......... $ Future expenses for medical and hospital pre .$ Expenses for medical and hospital pre ..... $ Future loss of earnings ......... $ ........... Loss of earnings ........................ $ Other prospective special damages ..........$ Special damages for ..................... $ Prospective general damages ..............$ General damages ....................... $ Total estimated prospective damages .......$ Total damages incurred to date .......... $ Total amount claimed as of date of presentation of this claim: $ Was damage and/or injury investigated by police? If so, what city? Were paramedics or ambulance called? #Is-n name city or ambulance If injured, state date, time, name and address of doct of your initial visit WITNESSES G �®r+1: List all persons and addresses of perso s k own hal formation: Name Address G— zaS r )VI l O � � j—O 38 So Phone Name - Address - S Phone Name Address Phone DOCTOR AND HOSPITALS: Hospital Address Phone Doctor Address Phone Doctor Address Phone READ CAREFULLY For all aoddentdaims place on following diagram name of streets, including North, accident by "A-1" and location of yourself or your vehicle at the time of the accident East, South, And West; indicate place of accident by "X" and by showing house by "B-1" and the point of impact by "X." numbers or distances to street comers. If City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A' location of City Vehicle when you first saw it, and by "B" location of yourself NOTE: If diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper diagram or your vehicle when you first saw City Vehicle; location of City vehicle at time of signed by claimant. CURB O SIDEWALK N07 /%ry Y 'OGCRC A jr CURB ---Z SIDEWA 72rA . "19 P�/�S Z),e algnazure or 4iaimanr or person tiling on his behalf giving relationship Typed Name: Date: to Claimant 0 8 5/30/o2 NOTE: CLIK MUST BE FILED WITH CITY CLERK (Gov. Code § 915a.) Presentation of a false claim is a felony (Pen. Code § 72.) (1 � 5 1)7• (i?. -2002 11:19 FAX 714 740 79921 C ARL WARREN C�� Tune 4, 2002 TO: The City of La Quirlta ATTACHMENT 2 ATTENTION: John Ruiz, Persomiel Risk Manager Rl---: Claim IIuerta vs. The City of La Quinta Claimant Wilfred Huerta D/went 1/1/2002 Ree'd Y/Ofce : 5/30/2002 Our File : S-133946-DBK We, have reviewed the above captioned claim and request that you take the action indicated below: CLABI 4 REJECTION: Send a standard rejection letter to the clairnant. Please PTO -Vide us with a copy of the notice sent, as requested above- If you havE any questions please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, CARL WARREN & COMPANY Dwight J_ Kunz CC- CJPIA w/enc. Attn.: Executive Director CARL WARREN & CO. CLAIMS MANAGEMENT -CLAIMS ADJUSTERS 087 750 '1'lx f3tp Dm*e Sc� �00 �lian�e, C�� 9Z�G5 Mail: P_0 B02c 51,90 - Santa Ana, (74k 92799-51R0 Phnn,; (7I4) 740-7999 Esc 140 - (800) 573-6900 - 1'ax (71+1), 740--941' ()n6 07-02-02 11:14 RECEIVED FROM:714 740 7992 P-01 07,02•2002 11:19 FAX 714 740 7992 CARL WARREN CO. ATTACHMENT 3 :ilftcd 11 a. .59 inging Palms Drive uinta, CA 92253 July 2, 2002 RE: Principal CJPIA Member City La Quinta Claimant = Wilfred Huerta D/Jncident 01/01/02 Our File S 133946 D8K Dear Mr. Huerta: As claim administrators for the self -insured City of La Quirlta, we have made a careful examination of the circumstances surrounding the captioned occurrence and feel we have enough evidence to make a decision on your claim. After evaluating the facts, we have reached the conclusion that our principal is not responsible for this occurrence. We are sorry we are 1-mable to recommend settlement of your claim to our principal. Our investigation reveals the depression in the road surface was caused by Time Wavier Cable. You may contact them direct with your claim @ 41-725 Cook Street, P.O. BOX 368, Palm Desert, CA 92260. phone: 760-340-1312. FAX # 760-340-9764. This letter does not affect the notice that will be sent to you by the City of La Quinta regarding disposition of your claim. Very trwy yours, CARL WARREN & CO. Deborah Seen City of La Quinta 7 dAj A4z cc: CJPIA CARIL WARREN & C O • CLAIMS MANAGEMENTeCLAIMS ADJUSTERS 750 The City Drive • Suite 400 . Orange, CA 92858 h1311: P.O. BOX 25180 • Santa Ana, Ca 92799-5180 Phone- (714) 740-7999. (800) 572-6900 . Fax: (714) 740-9412 EM 07-02-02 11:15 RECEIVED FROM:714 740 7992 P - 0 2 T4tyl 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 16, 2002 Q CONSENT CALENDAR: CO> ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution Granting STUDY SESSION: Conditional Approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 30357, Mountain View PUBLIC HEARING: Country Club. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for Tract 30357, Mountain View Country Club. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. Tract 30357 is located between Jefferson Street and Madison Street, and between Avenue 50 and Avenue 52 (Attachment 1) and consists of 178 residential lots, golf course lots, and lots for future subdivision of residential lots (Attachment 2). The developer has requested the City Council's conditional approval of the Final Map which will allow 30 days for completion of its processing. To date, the SIA (Attachment 3) has been executed by the developer but the associated securities have not been received. The Final Map is technically complete and is being routed for signatures. It is expected that the associated securities and all signatures will be in place within the time allowed for its conditional approval. As a result, City staff has prepared the attached Resolution which provides for conditional approval of the Final Map and SIA. The approval is contingent upon receipt, within 30 days (August 16, 2002), of a technically correct Final Map, suitable for recording by the County Recorder, with all required signatures (except for the City Clerk), SIA and associated securities. WO T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\02071 6a. Wpd Once these items are received, the City Clerk will affix the City Seal to the Final Map and offer the Final Map for recording by the County Recorder. If any of the required items are not received by City staff within the specified time frame, the Final Map will be considered disapproved and will be rescheduled for City Council consideration only after all required items have been received. The developer has demonstrated to City staff that sufficient progress has been made with the documents required for conditional Final Map approval. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 30357, Mountain View Country Club; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 30357, Mountain View Country Club ; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respe(�ffully submitted, Roy F. Step non, P.E. Interim Publi orks Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Vicinity Map 2. Tract Map 3. Subdivision Improvement Agreement Im 001 T: \PW DEPT=U NC I L\2002\020716a. wpd RESOLUTION NO. 2002- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING CONDITIONAL FINAL MAP APPROVAL OF TRACT 30357, AND AUTHORIZING A TIME EXTENSION FOR SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO VALIDATE THE APPROVAL WHEREAS, the City Council conducts only two regular meetings per month and the time interval between these meetings occasionally creates an undue hardship for business enterprises and individuals seeking approval of subdivision maps, and WHEREAS, the City Council as a matter of policy allows a subdivider to have city staff present the map for approval consideration when the requisite items necessary for final map approval are nearly, but not completely, finished thus yielding to the subdivider additional production time for preparation of those items, and WHEREAS, the subdivider has demonstrated to city staff and the City Council that it has made sufficient progress with items required for final map approval, and it is reasonable to expect the subdivider to satisfactorily complete the items, including city staff review time, within thirty (30) days without adversely impacting other ongoing work commitments of city staff, and WHEREAS, Section 66458(b) of the Subdivision Map Act grants the City Council broad authority to authorize time extensions regarding final map approval, or disapproval, upon receiving it for consideration, and WHEREAS, the City Council relies on professional city staff to review all required items for conformance with relevant requirements, and it is therefore appropriate for the City Council to approve the final map subject to review and confirmation of the required items by professional city staff, within a reasonable period of time as specified by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does hereby find, determine, order and resolve as follows: Section 1. The final map for Tract Map 30357 is conditionally approved provided the subdivider submits all required items on or before August 16, 2002. Section 2. The City Council's approval of the final map shall not be considered valid until the City Engineer has signed the map indicating that it conforms with the tentative map, the Subdivision Map Act and all ordinances of the City. Section 3. The City Engineer shall withhold his signature from the map until the subdivider has completed the following requirements to the City Engineer's satisfaction. U 9 �- 003 A. Place appropriate securities in accordance with the approved Subdivision Improvement Agreement. B. Finalize the final Tract Map and obtain all necessary signatures. -Section 4. The City Clerk shall withhold affixing the City Seal to the map title page, along with her attesting signature, until the City Engineer has signed the map. Section 5. The time extension for satisfying the requirements of the conditional approval for this final map shall expire when City offices close for regular business on August 16, 2002. If the subdivider has not satisfied the requirements in Section 3, herein, by the expiration deadline, the final map shall be considered disapproved. Disapproval does not deny any rights the subdivider may have under the Map Act to resubmit the final map for approval, or disapproval. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 161h day of July, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 09P ()04 TRACT NO, 30357 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE M O R 5 E 79-799 Old Avenue 52 . La Quinta, CA 92253 D O K I C H Voice: 760-771-4013 S C H U L T Z FAX: 760.771-4073 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS ATTAr:HMFNT 093 00 VICINITY 6-20-02 ATTACHMENT 2 IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 1 OF 22 SHEETS TRACT NO. 30357 RECORDER'S STATEMENT FILED THIS -DAY OF 2002 AT M. IN BOOK OF MAPS, BEING A SUBDMSION OF A PORTION OF SECTION 4, T. 6 S., R. 7 E., S.B.M., AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST THE clTr CLERK of THE am of LA QUINTA OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MDS CONSULTING AUGUST, 2001 GARY W. DOKICH L.S.4693 NO. FEE GARY L. ORSO, COUNTY RECORDER BY: DEPUTY SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE BY: FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OWNER'S STATEMENT WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON: THAT WE ARE THE ONLY PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS A CLEAR TITLE TO SAID LAND, THAT WE CONSENT TO THE MAKING AND RECORDING OF THIS SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO PUBLIC USE FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, LOT A (AVENUE 50), LOT B (JEFFERSON STREET), AND LOT C (AVENUE 52). AS A CONDITION OF DEDICATION OF LOTS A, B AND C, THE OWNERS OF LOTS Q THROUGH Y, INCLUSIVE, ABUTTING THIS HIGHWAY AND DURING SUCH TIME WILL HAVE NO RIGHTS OF ACCESS EXCEPT THE GENERAL EASEMENT OF TRAVEL. ANY CHANGE OF ALIGNMENT OR WIDTH THAT RESULTS IN THE VACATION THEREOF SHALL TERMINATE THIS CONDITION OF ACCESS RIGHTS AS TO THE PART VACATED. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND FOR RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS OF SERVICE AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES OVER THOSE AREAS DESIGNATED AS LOTS D THROUGH P, INCLUSIVE. THESE AREAS ARE RETAINED AS PRIVATE STREETS, AND FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES, FOR OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES, AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT. WE ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA A 22' EASEMENT FOR RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS OF EMERGENCY VEHICLES OVER LOT 197 AS SHOWN HEREON. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON. WE HEREBY OFFER FOR DEDICATION TO THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, EASEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND SANITATION PURPOSES OVER LOTS D THROUGH P, INCLUSIVE, DESIGNATED AS 'PRIVATE STREET'. THE EASEMENTS SO DEDICATED INCLUDE THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON SAID LANDS, TO SURVEY, CONSTRUCT, RECONSTRUCT, LAY, RELAY, MAINTAIN, OPERATE, CONTROL, USE AND REMOVE PIPELINES, FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES, AND TO REMOVE OBJECTS INTERFERING WITH THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE THEREOF. MERE ARE ALSO OFFERED FOR DEDICATION EASEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER PURPOSES OVER LOTS 1, 190. V. Y AND GG; EASEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND SEWER PURPOSES OVER LOT 190; AN EASEMENT FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES OVER LOTS 1 AND V; AND EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES OVER LOTS 1, F, C. V AND DO; AS SHOWN HEREON. THERE ARE ALSO OFFERED FOR DEDICATION LOTS 194 THROUGH 198, INCLUSIVE, IN FEE TITLE FOR WELL SITE PURPOSES; AND LOT T IN FEE TITLE FOR ACCESS PURPOSES. WE HEREBY OFFER FOR DEDICATION TO THE IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, AN EASEMENT OVER ALL PRIVATE STREETS SHOWN ON THIS MAP AND AN ADDITIONAL TEN (10) FEET IN WIDTH ON BOTH SIDES OF AND ADJACENT TO ALL PRIVATE STREETS AND/OR PUBLIC STREETS SHOWN ON THIS MAP, FOR THE EXCAVATION, LAYING, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, OPERATION, INSPECTION, REPAIR, REPLACEMENT, AND REMOVAL OF ELECTRICAL LINES, WARES, CABLES, DUCTS, SUPPORTS, FIXTURES, FACILITIES AND APPURTENANCES, WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER AND WITHIN SAME FOR MAINTENANCE, OPERATION AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES. WE HEREBY RESERVE LOTS Q THROUGH Y. INCLUSIVE, AND AA THROUGH LL, INCLUSIVE, FOR OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPING, MAINTENANCE, RECREATIONAL, DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT. WE HEREBY RESERVE THE PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON FOR OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT. WE HEREBY RESERVE THE AREAS DESIGNATED AS 'PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENTS', AND LOT 180 AND 183. AS SHOWN HEREON, FOR PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT PURPOSES, FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT. TOLL CA V, L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF )S. S. ON THIS- DAY OF , 2002. BEFORE ME A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE PERSONALLY APPEARED PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME/PROVED ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE, TO BE THE PERSONS WHOSE NAMES ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITIES, AND THAT BY THEIR SIGNATURES ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSONS OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSONS ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. WITNESS MY HAND: SIGNATURE: MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE IS IN COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT UNDER THE AUTHORITY GRANTED TO ME BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, PER RESOLUTION NO. 15-90. DATED MARCH 22, 1990, THAT I ACCEPT ON BEHALF OF SAID DISTRICT, ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS. THE DEDICATION OF EASEMENTS FOR ELECTRICAL POWER FACILITIES AS OFFERED, HEREIN. DATED: BY: ENRIQUE DE LEON, DISTRIBUTION SUPERVISOR COACHELLA VALLEY POWER DIVISION CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT UNDER AUTHORITY GRANTED TO ME BY RESOLUTION NO, 78-248, DATED SEPTEMBER 12, 1978,1 ACCEPT ON BEHALF OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT THE DEDICATION OF EASEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND SANITATION PURPOSES; THE EASEMENT OVER LOTS 1 AND V FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES; THE EASEMENT OVER LOT 190 FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES; LOTS 194 THROUGH 198. INCLUSIVE, FOR WELL SITES IN FEE TITLE, SUBJECT TO THE EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT OVER LOT 197; AND LOT TIN FEE TITLE FOR ACCESS PURPOSES; AS OFFERED HEREON. BERNARDINE SUTTON, SECRETARY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE, AS OF THIS DATE. THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE WITHIN MAP FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES NOW A LIEN, BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, WHICH ARE ESTIMATED TO BE E PAUL WDONNELL DATE COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR DEPUTY TAX BOND CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND IN THE SUM OF $ HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND FILED WITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA. CONDITIONED UPON THE PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL, AND ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, WHICH AT THE TIME OF FILING OF THIS MAP WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER ARE A LIEN AGAINST SAID PROPERTY BUT NOT YET PAYABLE AND SAID BOND HAS BEEN DULY APPROVED BY SAID BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. DATE: CASH TAX BOND GERALD A. MALONEY PAUL McDONNELL CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR DEPUTY BY: DEPUTY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF TOLL BROTHERS, INC., IN AUGUST, 2001. 1 HEREBY STATE THAT ALL MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED. OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN SUCH POSITIONS; AND THAT SAID MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. oNPL LAWp DATE: , 2002 AWSp� VL p�i�'sp GARY W. DOKICH L.S. 4693 EXP. 9/30/03 �YtFa pLIF�! CITY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE WITHIN MAP OF TRACT NO, 30357 CONSISTING OF TWENTY-TWO (22) SHEETS AND 1 AM SATISFIED THAT SAID MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT. DATE: . 2002 ERIC A. NELSON P.L.S. 5563 EXP. 9/30/05 ACTING CITY SURVEYOR CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE WITHIN ANNEXED MAP OF TRACT NO. 30357 CONSISTING OF TWENTY-TWO (22) SHEETS, THAT THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND ANY LOCAL ORDINANCES APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH. DATE: , 2002 ROY F. STEPHENSON, R.C.E. 20354, EXP. 9/30/05 INTERIM CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT I, JUNE S. GREEK, CITY CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO CLERK OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA. HEREBY STATE THAT SAID CITY COUNCIL AT ITS REGULAR MEETING HELD ON THE _DAY OF , 2002, APPROVED THE WITHIN MAP OF TRACT MAP N0. 30357; AND ABANDONED, PURSUANT TO SECTION 66499.20 1/2 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR DRAINAGE, SEWERS, PUBLIC UTILITIES, PIPE LINES, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES RESERVED IN STREET VACATION RESOLUTION NO. 91-86. RECORDED NOVEMBER 18, 1991 AS INSTRUMENT/FILE NO. 399317 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; AND ACCEPTED THE DEDICATION OF LOT A (AVENUE 50). LOT B (JEFFERSON STREET), AND LOT C (AVENUE 52), FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. SUBJECT TO IMPROVEMENTS; AND THE EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES. INGRESS AND EGRESS OF SERVICE AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES OVER LOTS D THROUGH P, INCLUSIVE; AND THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS AS DEDICATED HEREON. DATED JUNE S. GREEK CITY CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO CLERK OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF LA QUINTA SIGNATURE OMISSIONS: SEE SHEET 2 094 i ��exas�w.apixc��msr-oi.owc s-so-m 0013 SHEET 2 OF 22 SHEETS IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 30357 BEING A SUBDMSION OF A PORTION OF SECTION 4, T. 6 S., R. 7 E.. S.B.M., OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, MDS CONSULTING AUGUST, 2001 GARY W. DOKICH L.S.4693 SIGNATURE OMISSIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 66436 OF THE SUBDIVISION! MAP ACT, THE SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING OWNERS OF EASEMENTS AND/OR OTHER INTERESTS HAVE BEEN OMITTED. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HOLDER OF EASEMENTS FOR WATER RIGHTS AND RELATED DITCHES AND RESERVOIRS. AND A RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 22, 1919 IN BOOK 8, PAGE 24, AND JANUARY 11. 1923 IN BOOK 8, PAGE 295, BOTH OF PATENTS, AND NOVEMBER 4, 1955 IN BOOK 1816, PAGE 301 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; AND EASEMENTS FOR PIPELINES, RECORDED AUGUST 3, 1990 AS INSTRUMENT NOS. 287665 AND 287667. BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, HOLDER OF RIGHTS OF WAY TO CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN IRRIGATION, DRAINAGE, STORMWATER PROTECTION WORKS AND CANALS, LATERAL AND APPURTENANT WORKS AND STRUCTURES, RECORDED DECEMBER 30, 1949 IN BOOK 1135, PAGE 270; AND HOLDER OF EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS RIGHTS OF WAY COVENANTS AND PROVISIONS RESERVED IN DEED RECORDED AUGUST 2, 1947 IN BOOK B45, PAGE 386; BOTH OF OFEICIAL RECORDS. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND PIPE LINE AND NECESSARY DEVICES AND APPURTENANCES, RECORDED MARCH 25, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 110270 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. CITY OF LA OUINTA, HOLDER OF EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AND ROADWAY PURPOSES, RECORDED FEBRUARY 18. 2000 AS INSTRUMENT NOS, 2000-059966, 2000-059967, 2000-059970, AND 2000-059973, ALL OF OMCIAL RECORDS. THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAY PURPOSES, RECORDED APRIL 17, 1959 AS INSTRUMENT No. 32692. OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 095 007 SHEET 3 OF 22 SHEETS IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 30357 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SECTION 4, T. 6 S., R. 7 E., S.B.M., OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RNERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MDS CONSULTING AUGUST, 2001 GARY W. DOKICH L.S.4693 EASEMENT NOTES: EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS. RIGHTS DO WAY, COVENANTS AND PROVISIONS RESERVED BY A AN EASEMENT GRANTED TO COACHELLA VM.LEY WATER DISTRICT FOR UNDERGROUND PIPE LINE SURVEYORS NOTES: COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER OSTRICT IN DEED RECORDED AUGUST 2, 1947 IN BOOK 845, AND NECESSARY DEVICES AND APPURTENANCES, RECORDED MARCH 25, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT _ INDICATES FOUND MONUMENTS AS NOTED. PAGE 386 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (BLANKET IN NATURE AFFECTS THE NORTHEAST OUARTER OF No. 110270, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SECTION 4) QQ INTENTIONALLY OMITTED PER P.M.B. 112/68, UNLESS OTHERWSE NOTED. ■ - INDICATES FOUND 1' I.P. TAGGED RCE 16839 ANY VESTED AND ACCRUED WATER RIGHTS, RIGHTS APPURTENANT DITCHES AND RESERVOIRS, AND A RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS, RESERVED RVEDVED BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Q AN EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE Cltt OF LA OUINTA, A CHARIER CITY, FOR PUBLIC RIGHT OF A -INDICATES FOUND 1/4' I.P., R.C.E. 1660, IN DOCUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 22, 1919 IN BOOK 8, PAGE 24; AND JANUARY 11, 1923 WAY AND ROADWAY PURPOSES, RECORDED FEBRUARY 18. 2000, AS INSTRUMENT No, PER PMB 83/68 IN BOOK B, PAGE 295; BOTH OF PATENTS (BLANKET IN NATURE, AFFECTS THE N 1/2, SEC. 4), 2000-059966, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. O - INDICATES SET 1' I.P. TAGGED LS. 4693, FLUSH, .0 RECORDED NOVEMBER 4, 1955 IN BOOK 1816, PACE 301 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS (BLANKET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. IN NATURE. AFFECTS W 1/2. SE 1/4, SEC. 4). Q AN EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF I, CURIA. A CHARTER CITY, FOR PUBLIC RIGHT OF I' IRON PIPE TAGGED L.S. 469], FLUSH; OR SPIKE k QI PERPETUAL RIGHTS Of WAY TO CONSTRUCT, RECONSRiUCi, REPAIR, REPLACE ENWtGE WAY nN0 ROADWAY PURPOSES, RECORDED FEBRUARY 1B, 2000, AS INSTRUMENT N. WASHER; OR LEAD TACK TAGGED L.S. 4693 IN CONCRETE DIMINISH, USE, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN ANY IRRIGATION, DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER 2000-059967, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. TO BE SET AT ALL LOT CORNERS; OR IF LOT CORNER PROTECTION WORKS AND CANALS, LATERAL AND APPURTENANT WORKS AND STRUCTURES AS Q AN EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF DA OUINTA, A CHARTER CITY, FOR PUBLIC RIGHT OF FALLS ON FACE OF CURB, LEAD AND TACK TAGGED MAY BE NECESSARY OR CONVENIENT FOR DISTRICT PURPOSES, AS PARTICULARLY SET OUT IN WAY AND ROADWAY PURPOSES, RECORDED FEBRUARY I8, MEG, AS INSTRUMENT % LS. 4693 IN TOP OF CURB ON A 0.25' OFFSET, TO BE CERTIFIED COPY OF RESOLUTION OF COACHELIA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED 2000-059970, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SET AT ALL FRONT LOT CORNERS, EXCEPT AT B.C.-S, E.C.'S, DECEMBER 30. 1949 IN BOOK 1135. PACE 270 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. P.R.C.'S THAT ABUT A STREET WHICH ARE NOT LOT CORNERS INTENTIONALLY OMITTED MARKING SIDE LOT ONES, AND TO BE SET AT ALL CENTERLINE 2 3 4 5 INTENTIONALLY OMITTED INTERSECTIONS, B.C.'S, E.C.'S AND ALL OTHER CENTERLINE Q AN EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, A CHARTER CITY, FOR PUBLIC RIGHT OF MINTS OF CONTROL, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. © AN EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR PIPE LINE PURPOSES, WAY AND ROADWAY PURPOSES, RECORDED FEBRUARY 18, 2000, AS INSTRUMENT N. ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN 'SEY SHALL BE SET IN ACCORDANCE RECORDED AUGUST 3, 1990, AS INSTRUMENT Na 287665, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 2000-059973, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, WITH THE MONUMENTATION AGREEMENT FOR THIS MAP, UNLESS AN EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR PIPE LINE PURP05ES, AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIOE FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAY PURPOSES OTHERWISE NOTED. RECORDED AUGUST 3, 1990, AS INSTRUMENT N, 287667, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. RECORDED APRIL 17, 1959 AS INSTRUMENT N. 32692, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ( ) - INDICATES RECORD PER PARCEL MAP N0. 18727. AS MATTERS CONTAINED IN THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT ENNILED "INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT FOR P.M.B. 112/60, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. IMPROVEMENT BENEATH PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY', EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN LANDMARK LOUD COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION AND THE Cltt OF G OUINTA THIS TRACT MVP CONTAINS 198 NUMBERED LOTS AND RECORDED DECEMBER 4, 1990, AS INSTRUMENT Na. 439718, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 37 LETTERED LOTS. Q INTENTIONALLY OMITTED THIS TRACT MAP CONTAINS 364.74 ACRES. BASIS OF BEARINGS FD. 1" I.P., LS 3369, THE CENTERLINE OF AVENUE 50 SHOWN AS N 89'S5'27W DN. 0.2', PER MB 306/8-Z0, FD. 3/4" I.P., TAG ED. 3/4" I.P., TAG ILLEGIBLE ED. 3/4" I.P., RCE 9121. OW ON PARCEL MVP NO, 18327 AS FILED IN BOOK 112, PACE ACC. AS NW COB. SEC. 4 ILLEGIBLE, GlN OS' DN. 1.3', ACC. AS N 1/4 OF 0.4', PER MB 112/67-69, ACC. 68 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, ACC. A$ W 1/i6 SEC. 4, PER PMB 112/68. A$ E 1/16 CDR. SEC. 4. g AND TAKEN AS N 8954'31•W WAS USED AS THE BASIS OF COR. SEC. 4 N 89'S4'31"W 30.W' AVENUE 50 i $ BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP. `-j= 33 N 89'S4'31"W I l (2642.70') 2642.89' N 89'S4'Oi'W o (2641.30') 2641.26'`j 34 1321.53' 1 1321.36' 1320172' 1320.54' 11 N 89'54'31'W 911.36' N 89'54'01'W 1320.9Y 4 ON 3 Q• Lam17 O O PARCEL MAPv m� o � � I \ � '` n N 89'54'31'W 660.00' NO. �18327 0 ' -�_ ( J a9'S4.31'w 630.0 P.M.B. 112/68 a -°': 1RACY 1�04� 16 a�a z m 4 LM /112/6i•69 1 30' 5611 107317' I I I _J gv1Y 4 (371.57') (371.54 _ 12 14 71.58' 371.41' FD. 3/4} I.P., LS 5174, -`' O IS / 5 FLUSH PER CORNER RECORD 15 / a �o / No. 93-431 p j to b�/ \\\ 11— ,/ Aga ® '" PAR. I /PAR. 2 IL// L.L.A. 91-135 L.L.A. 2001-355J W -��' 7 9 to to 1941 o€off eza -�u� � /I PAR. 2 v 9 \ / H b ———L= e / L.l.A.91-136 / 3^ 1--�/ /20 In <m C m / PAR. 2 = ®sO1, , 21 Po 22 b Iy a I L.L.A. 2001-355uj 3 w b 1 ED. 7/4" I.P., LS 4146. / 25 DN. ACC AS NW 1/i6th p ( I / / 26 24 23 PER PMB 83/68, 1 FD. 1" I.P., NO TAG, N 89'46I74"E 27.62' 20' a /LYING HORIZONTALI, / N 89'44'24'E N 8944'24'E (2649.44') 2650.34' 1324.66' ' (1324.83' N.B. 712/67-69) I324.6i' 30.00' _ 1736.70' 1 — Z o 1325.17' 141.53' N 89'44'2CE 883.64_ / (265058') �649.31'T N 89'46'I4"E �S• O 1 Lie o. PAR. a L.L.A. cool-355 / / �jLn SEARCHED. ' / I I FD. 3/4' I.P., No TAG, DN. Qv �7 1 21 O FD. NOTHING. 2.0', ACC. AS CENTER SEC. \ zS•% W 1/4 COB SEC. 4t4: 30' 30' FD. 3/4" I.P., NO REF, „4 q PER PMB 83/68. /(3P y \ PAR. I PAR- 2 Q ESTABLISHED PER BENT, NOT ACCEPTED./ N / / �, / 2 ,< MB 21 o/38-sz PAR. 1 r n/ P? a/ / \20 PARC MAP L.L.A. 91.135 / PAR. 3 / �.,, / h /\ 19 \ NO. 457 n (II g L.L.A. 91-135 '�- n - — — — — — / 4 ,. 3 I IB � y P.M.S. 100/4® R o ,r o�l PAR.2 /a P f� J I PAR. 3 F. O ZO m $ (I 7 I L.L.A. 2001-355 / �� / �I TRA',P 21176 17L M.B. 166/95.91/ a NN �\ ~ G\✓V / 4 5 I 6 16 PAR. 4 \ SCALE: W II J S T"=a00' �''' PAR1 I a . 2 / o� .I o V 130� I / o b L.L.A. 2001-355 's "� d=11'33'15• 5 <� i LOT 3 R=1357.4' 58 14 3D 9 O I TRACT NO. 6682 b ,N z I U �.4° ,�yti - N 7'4' 47' G•c� ",(\ PAR.1 PAR.2 �O�P ; T SET TAG LS. 4693 10 Q I, - _ $ ""a' •. m N 89'45'S9"E 330.00' ? h R6Mk / = PARCEL MAP NO. 14367 - P.M.B. 6®/13� I 2001-955 a� PAR. 5 1 ,,\ / e �{ LOT 2 - FD. 1" I.R. LS 2606, ON 0.6' I T8 °i$g �$$L.L.A. 91-135 11 �. \' / = ACC. ABSS 1/4 COR. SEC. 4 R PER M88 42-43. 12 I� :--,W! IN bar- N 8745'59" / / (278.28' M.8. 166/95-97) 278.37' i 3 413.2J" _ 964.58' _ _ M.B. I I .9 _ 941.77 543.3' 781.51' N 89'46'5YE 2632.33' N 8445'59'E 30A4' (2649,73' P.M18. 83/68) 2649.59' L 3 N.A.P. I AVENUE 52 m' 1" LP., TAGGED 'USER", DC 0SE ACC. AS E 1166th FD. 1' I.P., LS 3369, 0N. 0.3', ACC. INSY. NO. 4199 FD, 1' I.P., LS 4691, CDR. SEC. 4 PER MB 166/95-97. AS SW CDR. SEC. 4 IN LIEU OF 1-1/4" ED. 1" I.P., NO 4691, ON Off, PER PER RS 93/82, ED. SPK. k WASHER, STAMPED RIV. I.P., LS 4146 PER RS 93/82. RS 93/82, ACC. AS W 1/16 COR. SEC. 4. ED. 1" I.P., NO TAG, FLUSH, CO SURV., 95-97, ACC.ASFLUSH, PER MB EC.64 ACC. AS INT. PER MB I66/ ED. 3/4- I.P., NO TAG, 95-97. DN. 1.0', NO REF. 1\3ezas—N-30ssr-13— - - 096 SHEET 4 OF 22 SHEETS IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 30357 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SECTION 4, T. 6 S., R. 7 E., S.B.M., OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MDS CONSULTING SEPTEMBER, 2001 GARY W. DOKICH LS.4693 ) 77 AVENUE 50 uN, ; N 8954'31'W 2642.89' N 8954'01'W 2641.26' N 891'W 54'3911.3 JA N 8954'01'W 1320.93' _ I Li Sly v 53 195 TOT LOT 0 41 \ ,� O Q N lDI H i I50 I31 ISi 153 ISI 155 19! \ z 51 %� \ 39 l0 192 IN a 1s6 \ q 38 — —SHEET NO. 19 I37 W SHEET NO. 15 roa l SHEET N0. 16 �� o EuII NO p n W r se 191 Ise !I SHEET N0. 22 _ SHEEP NO. 9 1 I SHEET — 18 N 89-54.31'W 630.00' br I zL � 34 _SNEEr NO_21 _ R ei q �. _ _ _ L_160 7 e 9 10 II 12 M q `3 _B H63 q lSq SXEET N0. 20JT 161 i] e6 N 8956'121 10]3.17' 51 63 101 162 n _ � Iq q1 q1 I 93 3 13 15 10 61 y qi IU °�° II li 17 le 19 q 21 T2 2S 2/ 15 !6 27 Ze 79 W fie t !I IN `% 1 / I i I � qq 116 to 11/113 II III IIO Iq iq �1 q 65 01T 2 —wrT 192 III 191 13n71 n la 79 �7EI e2 e3 er q es e7 �q 191 1166 16r =' r l T CC SHEET NO. II l 74 Ho LOT 0 Ter v 1 SHEET N0. 19 _ lq a IPOMELO I SHEET NO. 1111 191 = fig SHEEP N0. 15 _ L — _ SNEEi 0. 16 _ S E r= —_ _ _ IA / I I � � _I_ bl a 184 193 / N J —171— �I — SHEET N0. IS LEETI SHEET N0. 11 I zl a 193 188 20121 _I N0. I20 — _172_ O 149 0 Ill IU z 173 >o 3 Z N 124 m 194 W I 187 117 146 1M _ 0 105 N 186 In 11s lu 14i11 1n1291q SHEET NO 8 n6 W 196 z tO,L. Io a 142 13o I m i L+3 I 1 I .1—j IU 131 132 1 I wwx L — SHEET NO. 12 _ Ib IA 191 N_ SHEET NO 10 IOTA 164 I IH 137 1>s Its 179 N 894424 190 SHEET NO. 6 1190 _ — 190 SHEET N0. LSHEEIT N0. 13 _ L_ I 1HEEi NO. 14 O g 193 _ SHEET NO. 11 � TI SHEET N0. 7 L I 190 L` z a� \ W 182 rn I x z z 190 190 190 179 �1 H=11133'1 • 190 /I�— L-2713.]3� SHEET N0. 8 �J rr 197 �= LOT — -- — I— f Imo• N 894T54 E 941.77_ J SHEET N0. 5 N O12'06"W 190 181 I 190 185.48' 190 N 89'45' TE 3 LOT98 q 179 /NO. 330IT, boo 198 _ _L SHEET ?W AA ci 964.58' N 8946'537E 2632,33' T.1 N 8945'5TE 2649.59' J AVENUE 52 )97 001 PARCEL -1 - L .LA. 2001-3» —-- -- _--_---- I �� 4 ��4 v� ow I � % o�N €c> 2 P o= 6A ogA A� co30 i,z v2 iV f 5700' / v N O'11401'W O 11� 50.84' O I � �I s gfi ivo ,e gO( Ia _.. I_ ------ N 912'06"W 44400' 30.04 � N P71'4fi W S o giy N O'14'01"W g 55.00' o r> Fr T - [y�y RAD-PRC o CA zn 0 30' V 1% I sl' NA0 N 4'12'ISW_ �N oose� R°o N1g.J c pq SM cd r- N 39'3W'20'W / v - 0/55 43' '? R90 5/• �. J R_25B 5o Z..9. ��a NJPiop 9J669�. � Bp 0' P O m N S'3W'Op� F IID21 gin= 5�-� L I N 8747'54'E 941.77' 711.77'I N 912'06'W 185.47' �• I I ❑^' S I 1 r_ ______-___ N J I mI - I w� N iq O II z 0 II a m Z c� a ;o m N O z Z O Cm v y Z O m ; y m Z O `sA Z O 4J6B1 � MFNr o O o" o \3 0 o \ c 5 m O m o Z O Y a m 2 o C ti O 25 /( t7 x 2 r P 9 O m N O+1 w m J z I - D ' 3 \SB�J•P \1 10• T \� � _ y, 15' 19s• 19.8' N PIV01'W 12000' RPI1 �� ti I 0O 39' - fD r >%1 I I 39, I °•I� II _ m o n s' I N4P�J u � &' Fti ,P✓✓� � r I \ � (D 2 N1 0 F / �o o� oo I 40 NJ 10, rso. sCc n L' a.. � \ SEE SHEET NO. 7 n9 01.0 1.O IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 6 OF 22 SHEETS C T N . BEING A SUBDIVISION OF SECTION SEE SHEET NOS. 9 k 10 TOWNSHIP GE 7 FAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTAL, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. I 1 1 1 fio• I ? N 8753I'08'W o BAD - - bd ???333 "g � to I 5 N 89-5656-E E MDS CONSULTING AUGUST, 2001 21.1a' RA 1'S� , N lie 184 I aw 39. t191WC' PRIVATE GARY W. DOKICH L.5.4693 N ess6s5E 1a0.a0' N 2600'00"E ROAD SEE SHEET NO. 9 � 46.96 9EASEMENT 6Pv N 09'430.00'4'29'E z')<I'z 1 ^� ryE(M 190 N 8 124.78 /C. j, . 7 IOTAI a � ry<op�W 21 Rqp; (•J)7• 6vE, 182 t-- --- t N 0309_2fE 6lPoPo,W� I9\ 27 183 87'26'43'W RAp-PRC 9 18 r'28 rzi �P� y Alt 190 l w. ro\ \31'01 N60�229 22 bs 1 6szrss'w3 00N, RAD \ 6g R!p CURVE TABLE 30'„ 30' k DELTA RADIUS LENGTH b� I 1330'4C III DO' 28101' 2 13'30'46 S00.00' 117.92' �7S W m c 199.82' - N 830T}f E_ 4 1'08'5S 1200.002404' / 7/ Rpp-PRC 5 836'10" F G 6 ZOS'09" 1200.00' 43.69' W 2 7 IY23'56' S0000' 116.93 0 ' o [� 8 IJ'32'58' 1200.00" 283.78' 857'31' 1200.00' 10763' O N BJ_26'4J'W 10 4'75'2i 1200.DO 96.15' I a RAp_PR� - II 63'56'S6" 149,50' 166.86' 182 I I J L()1 ,`t., 12 4721 53' 149.50' 123 59' 15.12 AC. !] I 1635D3" 149,50' 43.2T 14 6356'S6 13000' 145,10' t 15 16'75'03' 13000' 1783' 190 1 ) ✓✓/ EASEMENTS w O O. 1 82 I�- INDICATES A 10.00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO CLl ti I' o ✓' 15.12 AC. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT. //✓�'& �--L4J Q- EASEMENT TD C.V.W.O. FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND SANITATION PURPOSES. �3 - INDICATES A 10.00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR al„ QI'i� CURVE TABLE i�✓0 No. DELTA RADIUS LENGTH PUBLIC UTILffY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO CITY OF U OUINTA CLl i (I 16 4721'53 1J0.00, 107./7' ®- INDICATES A PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT Cl ✓ 1 17 472F 110.50' 91.35' AS SHOWN HEREON. 1 10 3610'00' IB0.50' 117.94' l l �5 -EASEMENT TO C.V.W.D. FOR DOMESTIC 2 1110' 19 3910D0 21950, 130.55' WATER PURPOSES. 7 20 I'24'S5" 789.50' 1950' 41.61' ^�"' ©- EASEMENT i0 C.V.W.D. FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES. >, 8 N 63'26'43"W 21 23'S0'2fi 100.00' +_____ 8 RAD-PRC 22 3ID2'01' 10000. 54.16' 3 _ w ; 1 90 ❑8 - 22' EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT l.) _ _ 23 26'03'3T 100.00' 45,48' bo tg 124.76 AG DEDICATED TO CITY OF LA QUINTAL ,L LMi, o 24 3853'09" 207.50' 14083' II 25 14'3910T 10000' 2557' 6 AN EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE UNITED STATES 1p• 26 12900'00' 269.50' 606.77' of to OF AMERICA FOR PIPE LINE PURPOSES, RECORDED i Imo© 11 361100 211, 12121' o AUGUST 3, 1990, AS INSTRUMENT No. 287665, z INO 5022,4} 28 707'1 I' ' ' tow OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. E; 1 29 749'50" 789.50' 39,00' Q7 AN EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE UNITED STATES ill w 30 26'03'36' 100.00' 4548' OF AMERICA FOR PIPE LINE PURPOSES, RECORDED LT7 11 31 1041'18" 1200.00' 227.86' n>�. AUGUST 3, 1990, AS INSTRUMENT No. 287667, OF Ili OFFICIAL RECORDS. [/j Q MATTERS CONTAINED IN THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT E ENTITLED "INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT FOR N 03'02'Si _ PAD PRC IMPROVEMENT BENEATH PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, Z 1 90 EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN LANDMARK LAND 124.78 /G COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA INC.. A DEIAWARE _ CORPORATION AND THE CITY OF LA OUINTA w2 m �I L� 39 RECORDED DECEMBER 4, 1990, AS INSTRUMENT m No. 439718, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. II N V26'43'W ® AN EASEMENT GRANTED TO COACHELLA VALLEY T AO _ -- RD-PRC 23 30 WATER DISTRICT FOR UNDERGROUND PIPE LINE FT I I N6y, gNEE AND NECESSPRY DEVICES AND APPURTENANCES, !is °BZ 6SA� G Rgp'gRCgW RECORDED MARCH 25, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT No. ^• N�p,P`J'eft 110270, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. III Q AN EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF 'l I L LA QUINTAL, A CHARTER CITY, FOR PUBLIC e RIGHT OF WAY AND ROADWAY PURPOSES, RECORDED FEBRUARY 18, 20DO, AS 8 INSTRUMENT No. 2000-059970, OF OFFICIAL RECDRDS. 0 '.- - 182 g ® AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE COUNTY OF II 1I �� RIVERSIDE FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAY PURPOSES III N 8302'}I"E t 1.H7 /C.�- ; "' 0� RECORDED APRIL 17, 1959 AS INSTRUMENT RECORDS. pRC 16.27 874, 54'E dl e`e No. 32692. OF OFFICIAL a R`ZPo. 00' L'850. Cn N 870057'E RD 0197 1 N112. ---' SEE SHEET 3 FOR SURVEYOR'S _j of 2 / $ o.62 AC. 1797' _ T I NOTES AND BASIS OF BEARINGS 30 ,, _ S RAD-4 PRC N H7\ H LOT T 1 606426'4J'W '1 P4�,h$E/ 60.64' 310.01 $ _ RAD N 85'31'5YW - -- 6 AC - 88'� \ 0.00' I7.66' 152.32' Imo' j 100 50 0 100 200 300 .2 N '14 E 81''I .I I .I6' N 89'47'S4'E 941.77' I; I Ile w• io' 56.57' o 31 197 H7 / / oe2AC.� i I 4 181 SCALE 1"=100' 181 1 1 ;' pppN85'51'S8y'E�� a 7I177' ______________ 60 �00' I52.32 26197' 190 24 / 7}j SEE SHEEP N0. 5/� I LOT T 0.01 IG N 8447'S4 E 941 77' N 112111 185.41' / 1 �„N2N6\NAPPIN�„Ns7_o6NwG 099 oil IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CAUFORNIA TRACT NO. 30357 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. MDS CONSULTING AUGUST, 2001 GARY W. DOKICH L.S.4693 SEE SHEET NO. 11 190 O �3a06. T7' /\ 124.78 K. N i ` W 181 W \ 4 N N 350000"E 1389 SCALE 1"=100110 -'1 79' \ \ r \ \AgGh� 4 j t� \ a Q�P 24.AG. \ \ \ IWEST = 430� IIQoI / lbw� \\�� =I 181 2 168.4A' � ^e 52I.00' 181 i- m — _ _ _ EAST 68948f PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT 4T r i 181 _ I I N 84'2FVW N 90'00'00"E 527,78' RAO �e 181 24.65 AC. - 190 124.78 AC. Z W / / IN / / W / tr�39, 6 p1 - - SEE SHEET N0. 5 SEE SHEETNO. 5 181 �oA�s 24.65 AG WI 190 180 198 SHEET 7 OF 22 SHEETS M'�® o® 411II EASEMENTS ®- INDICATES A PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT Z AS SHOWN HEREON. 05 - EASEMENT TO C.V.W.D, FOR DOMESTIC W WATER PURPOSES. N SEE SHEET 3 FOR SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND OASIS OF BEARINGS N 5T5652'W 11 58' R O 6 \ \ A=79'08'48' R=6000' =82 88, N 6JrB. A=7556'02 R=60.00' 1 04• 1 5 z1 P1 1 P 1 $ol 11 A=29'31'21" �`I 1 R=60.00' L=309T \ h �yS a N 451570 yj iN SA870' �5 "I G- b 0 O 179 pppi5 1G titi y y / P �p / / ro / I / / I I / 100 50 0 100 200 300 190 PARCEL I PARCEL \/J I\P Na A367 P.IiMa Sj//3 azos,R�P�, o s o ow 4 100 OX 4 IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 8 OF 22 SHEETS TRACT NO. 30357 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. MDS CONSULTING AUGUST, 2001 GARY W. DOKICH L.S.4693 SEE SHEET NO. 11 SEE 'E27N . 13 SEE SHEET NO. 13 SEE SHEET NOS. 13 & 14 /144 128 M m91 176I 3 3 0$ of�I ' 1431 O N\ 129 Z J3 Z w o rn Cl i142 \a ; \ 130 �Z = 177 17.5'I A 131 132 �k N smo 190 140 133 `� s9y, N 8941'55'E 150.00' SEE SHEET NO.t12— — _ _ N SEE HEET NO. 2_ \�9 134 �� 191 2 ;; 191 q Q, s�. 139 k 138 W/ 9 50'-L=219-82= -N 894I'S5'E1 0 IOfi 53' -2fi168' sOl < 1\ 6 137 ) \ ,14 _ _203-31=--15693"1 i0.�H �4. j4'j7 694155E �P261fi l� i 0 _ LOT 0� 35" O ZII e� ,oa 3 135 r \p; 1.781C. N89'4111547E 179 I'_" 136 �11e yU' m N z ��891/ 8 Iz 190 �:'.'// FD. 1' I.P.. Na TAG, Nw C.7�S Z`/ 7h Z GSbSi%�' 2 LYING HORIZONTAL, 7 276246'14E $. L — SEE SHEET N0. 13 _ — _ _ — _ _ SEE SHEEP NOS. 13 & 14 NO. 14 ,,5 ��` — _ _ _ _ = J_SEE SHEET ti , _,p�\,�, \yv / N0. 14 / SEE SHED / CURVE TABLE No. CELTA ""us LENGTH I 2211'S1" 300.00' 116.23' 2 484I'41" 13250 112,61' b 3 29'18'36" 219,50' 112.29' 4 ]313'33' 200.00' 7033' r 5 13'254fl2'S.Y 18030' 79,24 &/ / Z 6 44'12'01" 18050' 179.24' / e / rw190/ N 124.73 X SCALE 1"=100' 179 EASEMENTS / I rRAC7 I110. 2-1176 INDICATES A 10,00 FOOT EASEMENT PUBLIC U AItt PURPOSES DEDICATED O0 / ��413 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT. 40- EASEMENT TO GV.W.D. FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND SANITATION PURPOSES. INDICATES A 10,00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR PUBUC UTllltt PURPOSES DEDICATED TO �y o Cltt OF CA OUINTA •J� // V / 4I- INDICATES A PRNATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON. 0.- SEE SHEET 3 FOR SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND BASIS OF BEARINGS NJ. PC O F yd PRE e� 7S RD. 3I.P., 168 / g / RCE 16807, 190 PARCEL -1 P.I\,/I.�'. E3/73 PARCEL 2 N 179 s�3 / lo0 50 0 100 200 300 �` s.,a ED. 3/4' I.P., RCE 16807, SEE SHEET NO.7 / // / / ON. 0.3'. I:\39206\MFPPINC\30357-09.NWC 6 ]-P3 0113 IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 9 OF 22 SHEETS TRACT NO. 303517 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA MDS CONSULTING AUGUST, 2001 GARY W. DOKICH L.S.4693 h 60' IISEE SHEET N0. 15 70{ SEE SHEET N0. 10 T SEE SHEET NO. 15 SEE SHEET NO. 16 T i it N 8'W fi6300' 0 CJ ry 8T54ssa 'n'w 6]G °o' PAF?C L I\iIAP IVJ. -J2,327 o w w � ! 1 O O o g N N L4 PAFt. 1 ZIZ� Ed -^ JD' 30' 7 ! 9 10 0 "' t�l� r N N ari U 30' 11 12 FD. Y I.P., RCE 8630, ON. 0.4', NO flEF. IN LIEV OF 1' I.P. RCE 16839 TO. 1' I.P., RCE 168J9. = = IN WNC, DN. 04' PER to N PMB 112168. J Cl] m_ I \\CC T' - J� C 00' PER PMB 112/68, LOT DD LOT fG ICI \ N 89'Sfi'12'W, 41 \ w w I� 107317. - + 6 I I F C)> II fi0' OJ 3 19.5' 7 2 I5' �I 1 L."D LSP e Cl N t1 �I I 3 1I I I I ti Ed U 30' 2 L4 I I I I I 1 3 10' 7 1— — SEE SHE LOT }V 057 W. - LOT I .11 M. L337OT D I IL' I I I 41 S 11 J I1e 17 ( IB ^ I 19 I 28 21 I 22 22 d 10 --N 89'S6'12"W l6.]9' r� Z t^O 10' 1 3 15' (� 192 27.39 At z O W Z _— - r SEE SHEET NO. 10 W xJ N I\9`s W I" — d=10'JI'19" SCALE 1-100' E I 18�4 j — — — ——m„a-.G-L-112: OS'_ 1—=n=iavo.w O/ d=10' .1I' 19' N-I9'7I' � �F O Dan Ac. w 1.8/N.• / �_ 100.00SW� �4=1947'�45 R=1026-50'-La54:61 P=-- 6E SHEET NO 1 _ — — SEE SHEET NO. 15 of _SEE SHEET NO_16 — — I � 5' ICn — '19�--- ZI z _ I =I w N JI 184 � W I 11.13 IC. �I 1 1 ti I a ' I \ I t— I 23of ?•1 23 28 [T 192 017 27.39 NC CW Z I Z I�g NN N I`°� N nn 14 p�4' 16' 2fi I p�2fi:50'-L=173-78=N-6956'56'E-145.97'— ,A16 26' N 89'56'56'E 145.97' L=12 449 - Rs�-�-167,5: 20=N-8956'S6'E-145.9] _ SEE SHEET NO. 16 L _ SEE SHEET NO. 11 0� 11II �®� 1111 LLI 1 1 a 7 275.00' N 8755'00 w 184 193 O 214 AC. N W W FI 85 r!' c 184 r — 5.03 All O s J 1 ( o f �275.Da �-PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT N 82'55'00W'1 4\ o — I z l 184 —— to NI 185 5.03 AC. I e 196 / N 51.8J' Gy Z R,]00. 00' L=226.89' 718.00' 184 S 000 N 705,06E i� 30' / 11.13 /C. o oA 901 / N 8255'00W 667.87' I �/ / � tie 0• �/// EASEMENT$ INDICATES A 10.00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR --RAD_pAC �S�' �/ / PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO i hg/// IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT. L 6 Y SSEE SHEET NO. 10— — — _ =` SEE SHEET NO. 10� ti// 190 2❑- EASEMENT To C.V.W.D. FOR DOMESTIC z t Y — `\\ y ti / / 124.78 C WATER AND SANITATION PURPOSES. -Nss9'arw _ SEE SHEET `✓ N0. 6 �i// w RA0-PRC - - 1 84 ,0 55 s. Q- INDICATES A 10.00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR x po°,y PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO 4n �+ 5 �\ Cltt OF U OUINiA N 6T53'OB'W RAD INDICATES A PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT to gV Ila/�N89'S6'S6'E oa N\N / ] 21.14' RP0 m' p (/ AS SHOWN HEREON. CTS I� 21'S �� hoo 190 Q7 - EASEMENT TO CV.W.D. FOR IRRIGATION MD ]9.PURPOSES. �o Q 1 N 89'56'56E 14080' 469fi 0,06E n,1)I' 44' 39` R=70p 0U, J 1 95G 190 190 awi 60' �y lead, r N 9 a N 64'0000•w N �306"W 0E 8 �7 ^� \° 183 182 roru C' 6jJ7' N CURYE " 0.52 AC. 13 R,qN` J'W 15.12 AG. 1 1963.00', P SEE SHEET 3 FOR SURVEYOR'S n G12'a6`W N 8309'z1 E 1 90 SEE SHEET NO. 6 1°° s° a 1aD z66 396 SEE SHEET NO. 6 p NOTES, BASIS OF BEARNGS, AND I987.De' R� N a�12'Dcw 19eza°' + IXISi1NG EASEMENT NOTES l\18106\MMPING\30357-09DWG 6-17-02 ion 014 IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 10 OF 22 SHEETS TRACT NO. 30357 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. SEE SHEET NOS. 9 & 15 1 1 MDS CONSULTING AUGUST, 2001 GARY W. DOKICH L.S.4693 17}I 11 1}}I PRC 1 1 3 NR811'3]E_ 08 �01391 4 CURVE TABLE ^°� m 1 a q soy aol SEE SHEET NOS. 9 & 15 N1 D08'2 Rn650 4312' 7 1 RAD N 05'11'20E `�"' rlv H „ 1 I 105'OB'2r' ENGTH 23.50' 43.12' 60' N 8956'56'E 6192' z$EE SHEET NO_ 9��' o f�o o 2 2 04'22'25' 23.50' 50R34Cp, m 3 3611,55' 80.50, 50.86' _________ N8956'S6"E I1592' •� jE 19r} Z 4- 6o.0a' 55.92' o `� $ 1\ L 4 2605'OT I1050 57.92' r _ 20.11 LOT057 �V N 003 04'W N S/S� may\ ,$ �� PA� 22.N AC. 6 272728' 129 50' 5016' Cj N 475633'W 35.05' `%o." '`�f"''�A'a 9 \N \ 7 I'S9'4T' 500.00' 1742' y - N 89'56'WE 3000' phi s Q ' 35 fi 8 4037'49 56.00' 39.71' w — 9 T06'ii" 110.00' 48,89 y \ aj2 48'2§E 4 10 25'28'04 II0.00' 4889' 30' N 89565CE 69.00' .�., N lA _ C N 8419_2f E_ 8 �pY� _ W;p_PG 19.5' -\ pp_PRC — — — — SCALE 1"=50 — N 003'OCW 1000' 9.07'.� I _ 21.67' 45.34' 42.28' `_'— _ — _ LOT D g 6 N 8956'56'E N 8824'S 87.62' d=10}6I' 19' R426 50' 3XIX r3674'- (e 72T m �{�1 e L=151_7e'-� :N 8956'56E gP "' 59300' H P0""'�'O d=10'JI'19' R-800n u 130.00 300D' - - 250 W' 28300LOT r1fi.14'r g 1 PRVATE SL J.33 AC. 8 N 89'56'56T N BB I8.5 "E "' 87,62' N 89'5656'E 240.74' d=10' 31' 19" R=773 5p L=142-05' ry 27.67__9534' 42.28' 2 _ _ _ _ N 003'04"W 10.00' 9.07"� + g 2/ I $ ,� N 84'25'29"W_ — N 89'56'SCE 6900' O ,A�yo- / _ RAD-PRC EASEMENTS 184 � � �o N B956'S6'E 30.00' /� g 1�- INDICATES A 10.00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR Q AN EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF 05' N 4750'25"E 35.�,/ PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO IA OUINTA A CHARTER CITY, FOR PUBLIC i� v IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT. RGHT OF WAY AND ROADWAY PURPOSES E" , LOT U N 003'04'W R RECORDED FEBRUARY 18, 2D00, AS W N 8956'56E S��a • e 193 ❑2 - EASEMENT TO C.V.W.D. FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND SANITATION PURPOSES. INSTRUMENT No. 20DO-059966, OF OFFICIAL �+ E" 4 03'0 N 002200 6000' Q a ry 1214 Ar 00' /�0 Z ❑3 - INDICATES A 10.00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR RECORDS. i/] N 895656E 6I 84' /PZE 6825 0� PUBLIC UDLRY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO CITY OF 1A OUINTA Q AN EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF LA OUINTA A CHARTER CITY, FOR PUBLIC N 83'I7'g1'W E1 INDICATES A PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON. RIGHT OF WAY AND ROADWAY PURPOSES, RECORDED FEBRUARY 18, 2000, AS o ok / RAD-PRC 0 INSTRUMENT No. 2000-059973, OF cc w�- m q }'Lo a N6 184 05 - EASEMENT TO C.VW.D. FOR DOMESTIC WATER PURPOSES. OFFICIAL RECORDS. o j a Q- EASEMENT TO C.V.W.D. FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES. 184 N 6g35PoW 11.13 AD. m W I Z N T56 \ e3,00'6 00 rn P \ \ F- I \ \ I JSOp'W \ \ \ Vgre J7g2p \ \ 30 \/ -" FgSF 83 11'3YE_- - - -- -- -- N I\ Z e � \ \ N bh7',I'W RAD-PRC - ---- ---- w - 0 -- -o 184 �r A,�a 11.13 AC. Imo\ 1 66 J96�EW > 110, / �o N 6q;Tj'Po IV / 0 76q 7 / N 895656E WEE N 003'04'W 21.00' N 895656E 10.00' 10' 196 A 0.78 AD. r\S�A�,P/ / 11184 5 3 1s / e ` m� IF 39' a 8 / o: 0 1rE !D 1 . 3 / J J N1530 t1E � 'r'n, yd - pA0-PRC+�30�j - N 8956'S5E 43,00' R=110./ 184 11.13 AE: 50 25 0 50 100 150 $ + SEE SHEET NO. 9 193 12.14 IC. 184 4,T B�000' \ l g o d_1076'4i12865fip o' o, Z 184 w WN W N 190 124.789. SEE SHEET 3 FOR SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND BASIS OF BEARINGS I\38206\MFPPINC\30351-10.0WC - - 10J 01 t3 f SEE SHEET NO. 9 111 } 1� 1� l }� SEE SHEET NO. 9 'I `39, Jr 26.5' 1 265' - �d� S I /� II,53' I rn .16 90�_, m aN Tosoo°E i/s.a' ml I m aa6\-av� m T--------- o Qa N z 1 m co 0 �(_n \\'o O m- - — — — — o� m s. SEE SHEET NO. 17 w 1 1 3 - 169.50' 339.00' N IJ'20'75•E �6'7S7g`E I o o �4 _�I, 1, _N R22'5P"E� 169.91'�\J tz Asa - me �a 00 - a r�q � �79' 2501N N TO5000 I I9.50' r 15950' 3119.00' q r 15950' 2 tigti o e" 1LOT E F' N — — — 00SEE-SHEET N0. 12 4`. /�1 6 � m\ 2 g o +Q` y4 d o O D m iwo 4 A Cam w to OS'g9,�.j5\O��a .h ^ O 0 C Z tl� N IP00'00'E N 85.31'-- 48.8I'-.14-LBt�� 0�1 6'43'D m I N m 0 71 0 C A y m 9I.41' N P00'OO E - _—__ I' _ _ 9 o _—__ ___ �lwNN z �� `�� 1�8 o mo �D S m o m� \\ O NO 17 o z p n voD'oD'[ 3111s l `8 o ISEE SHEET y �+ o SEE SHEETcoi 5 rn 0 �i NO. 18 c z o 0 0 o o;l ,F1a,N�=0 0 �I I � E6 Q1 8 > m oRsi sus o�i /air j c o m� o:2 - �o II A F zm 0 f° o> >�sf mpg J b�' / S/ co pm \ Q N £ po V t0 �m rZ'1• mCZ m ? _ O O o S m 3 r M �v o ya r z P/ / N �. z O m m SEE SHEEP Na 13 N N Ln ,'' 0 0 tD r A rn N m W / �O d A o / v _SEE SHEET�NO. 18 r00 ,```a CO W w A N CND m i e W—� 00 / y W S r HEEf NO. 72 __�� m m i m 00 N z m �,Y� / O v 9 2691. o o1 v / / W u 4F m o s ao a) 00 V O m _N —�_ - sn- ✓s-, f W —— __ — —— �) _ SEE SHEET x Rao w NO. 14 F !s sys.c = �ti SEE SHEET NO. 14 I � 00 0 00 m - zm 0 m v e Nsss A N 8 m ON t0 41" N _ ? 4'45'WE 6bf o RAD 39' 19.S.I .{1' '119.5' !f t0 �2 n m v \ i\ 15f II L SEE SHEET NO_19 104 . 43 SEE SHEET NO. 11 20' SEE SHEET NO. 11 N 8T5500'W 163.78' N 8755'00"W 163.78' _ LOT °�° ° °`o'z om IC. o 9f I9 __4 Oo / yc �ml Itiba NJT �b`.�i _ O a = m flg1� ZO I1IN\��• , No�� GG�S 0 `O6 85.31'____ 4881'_60 m �Np E J41C1770' 33" 0I0 I/ z 43'30'E -317-50' L�6-10N POO'GO'E 134-IIOII N p=1T 20'336 fS�l z- N O'00'WE 134.11' i„ R=300.00' L-90. 81' _ e m U N -- 53 0l ,po'a a\N - - - 1� - NnON 41'25E 'I R 26.50' 26,50' 26.5' 26.5 `11 �dJ J 1^ �_' 01 N I 1 ?; � 4sOo �f RAO \ 1 X tI I'o 229y OO NPIS'JJj4cE o N V00'00'E 717.14N 126'13"E _ -'� ru0-RNc v �' ell�l I I pda ,' ti 'b. (D 1 I src pild,' a�tq vl i rl--Qa - o m 81 I NN �tT9`q y 94 N�SJ� N '0cC P`�\ ds Z "' g`^ / / �F m 00 Z F' N to Co to 5� e z a N 01 SO & W m O D m3�� V3_I zz N p � 3> e ? N�� moo. ��J Rq 4d' dti / 2 O ^' �°� W s�p�ir °�a °'`q` d / Jpq�o • N � w m � P + � O m A 2, w5 4tie N N` r m Za FE r.^ D N$O W om NQ� 0 Z i a p p2 NJSJ C" f\ r O m S N m V m ^ O m z g ceZF //B yO// NJSJ V � i o� vm�4z 2 ai sr = 0 o /J — +(02 00 3 R' �J /0 / 2 ZD (.I 6N vN Nh Z N o f J / SEE SHEET NOS. 8, 11 k 13 / SEE SHEET NOS. 11 do 13 105 oil IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 13 OF 22 SHEETS TRACT NO. 30357 BONG A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. MDS CONSULTING AUGUST, 2001 GARY W. OOKICH L.S.4693 r+ SEE SHEET NO. 19 O 191 Z rr TJ O Z N 191 N w 3724 AC. N EASEMENTS I❑ — INDICATES A 10.00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR w fA PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT. ❑Z - EASEMENT TO C.N.W.D.FOR DOMESTIC WATER EASEMENT CNITNATIOPURPOSES. d q. 0 ❑y - INDICATES A 10.00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR 7q, 1 24 PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO Piss CITY OF U QUINTA N Ai 'fie SHEET 3 FOR SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND BASIS OF BEARINGS NOTES f/) SCALE 1"=50' = 125 N jJ7 2 N a• y N 126 of 95 �� ry 's 127�� \ 95 79 iptiti QQC G2� '$ �5 128 a 191 B1 a, � 37M W. �,Po . �, ,�a \o. 129 ii B66\ \ 'hh$ ry 40 \ 130 Z 142zo sue\ \ .g s�. 8 131 a H 6, 141 \ Sew JJ �6 132 ", °S zP ✓l 2yh °ply Q \ 76 \�'� 5\ Z 140 133 soa. 6 139 134 0 138 pc� (oJ� ? i 5 & a �9 191 � S,0, 190 12.78 /G �� 0=, _- 9 137 �� 9 \�J9• d, /J JS' d=44'12'F• L=1391, 24' / E �. \(•�\8), JJ\SRR105'`LZ2556I' "0� a_,a .$ d, )J. JS^ -,v \aJ\o 50' L=280.d=l9' _10?JT 18' 36" L'Ti179/ 5�. N aJ 2h 136 �� ply J? 2 Ie Sf O J o Z Li S CARVE TABLE O �i. ,�� 135 N No. 1 2 DELTA 24'1437' 24'14'37° RADIUS 480,50' 500,00 LENGTH 20331' 21157' ,o p 7J. z✓' ¢�$/ Q d✓SZ 2g N 3 24'14'37' 519,50' 219.82' = _ 4 5 1S25'53" IP25'51 319.50' 280.50' 74.90' 65.76' R✓b95'r165, ,l O O W 6 7 8 24'21'16• 4'59'48• 2*37'51' 500.W' 180.50' 319,50' 212.53 15.74' 14.67' (y 2y6, ti7 1190 B0 ?9), �`"�� N W W 9 1'36'11" 280.50' 7.85' 190 SEE SHEET NO. 7 4,�0 50 25 0 50 100 150 SEE SHEET NO. 8 b\38205\1AP lG\3Wv—ULWL 2 W N w N M 43 0 IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 14 OF 22 SHEETS TRACT NO. 30357 1701 BONG A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN 175' 17.5• BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 35' MDS CONSULTING AUGUST, 2001 GARY W. DOKICH L.S.4693 SEE SHEET NO. 20 II 191 EASEMENTS 1❑ - INDICATES A 10.DO FOOT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT. M- EASEMENT TO C.V.W.D. FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND SANITATION PURPOSES. Q - INDICATES A 10.00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO CITY OF LA OUINTA r ®- INDICATES A PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON. ❑5 - EASEMENT TO C.V.W.D. FOR DOMESTIC WATER PURPOSES. ©- EASEMENT TO C.V.W.D. FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES. SCALE V" 50' SEE SHEET 3 FOR SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND BASIS OF BEARINGS 191 ST.E4 AC 191 171 SEE SHEET NO. 20 N 8941'55E 150,00' 172 PoN II I J N 89'41'S5 E I50.00' I I, to 173 m0� o N 8941'55'E 15000' 174 w IF Im 7 N 8T41'55'E 150.00' om 0 7 C 175 Ig m m - o N e9'41'55'E Isaao• I 176 I8 N BT41'55E 15000' I 177 S Im NS raJ < IV 178 133 s; !;2 N BT41'S5"E 134 191 191 — ---\-- LOT 01,7E Ac 106.57-- N 8941'55'E 261.68' - 2 Ji19.o050 paA4140 ]i P3. oo' v211.51' I /. A TALAVERA N8T41'S5'E 72443' 261 68' NMATE 5T. r'. Fi— ' �7 N 8941'S5"E 261 68' - z 156.93' 104.75' — — IW- e= 1-1355 m �24' \ s. p=1A. i4' 11 i0. 6B' i p2 / S6o�L`11i.19'i b 1Cx z 190 Z w 2 Nw W N SEE SHEET NO. 8 & 11 �f N 89'4155E 47' b CURVE TABLE ' No. DELTA RADIUS LENGTH190 1 6527'2T 23.50' 26 85' 2 2 24'02'21' 4150' 17.41' E 7 4874'58" 23.50' 19.93'- 4 2147'12" 98.50 37.46' 'Ai' 5 4T34'25" 4150' 3156' R 6 2711'51" 467.50' 181.12' 7 21'4T13' 9850' 3746' e o fi Cy � SEE SHEET NO. 8 50 25 0 50 I00 150 l J Ll LC) Ig I 1 3 IO 2 10 1 3 IO' 75' 1 n 175 E I N61544'�G -J` 2 I R c 627a' m z3 LOT Jr 2E0 AO. - Q-, Si 2 4 RAO_ RC W 35' 17.04 AD. If t lt� I a FD. 1' I.P., No TAG. LYING HORIZONTAL. I w I N B9'46'14 E Io I 27.6T 0 0¢ 179 179 17.04 At- may` SEE SHEET NO. 8 1�Teaos�Mraalxc�ams7-la.owc 6-n-� 10'7 01.9 IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 30357 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. MDS CONSULTING AUGUST, 2001 GARY W. DOKICH L.S.4693 Q- INDICATES A 10.00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO Q AN EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF IA OUINTA, A CHARTER CITY, FOR PUBLIC IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT. RIGHT OF WAY AND ROADWAY PURPOSES, 2 - EASEMENT TO C.V.W.D. FOR DOMESTIC RECORDED FEBRUARY 18, 2000, AS WATER AND SANITATION PURPOSES. INSTRUMENT No. 2000-059967. OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 0- INDICATES A 10,00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR TO Q AN EASEMENT GRANTED i0 THE CITY OF PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED CITY OF LA OUINTA IA OUINTA, A CHARTER CITY, FOR PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AND ROADWAY PURPOSES, q - INDICATES A PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 18. 2000, AS AS SHOWN HEREON. INSTRUMENT No. 2000-059973, OF ❑5 - EASEMENT TO C.V.W.D. FOR DOMESTIC OFFICIAL RECORDS. WATER PURPOSES. ©- EASEMENT TO C.V.W.D. FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES. N 8637' RAO m� N 8T54'31'w 660.00' N 89'54'3i'W 63000' SHEET 15 OF 22 SHEETS SCALE 1"=50' SEE SHEET 3 FOR SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND BASIS OF BEARINGS D a 7 s 8 N 88'3w4'59'E 9 a 10 ti O 11 12 W - R4p N ae ?p?!6 I7 53' 45.47' 08' 'n 10' b�jSp S6 N Wa56 dam' 78' S9" d=13� l ¢� / I,� I50.006 W 12 m d=23 56' 18" R52 15 L'7l / r/ ^o m9 r LOT DO 1 3 17 _ 50,Q N89'S67142'—M_„^dam=23{,5(6B-R]J01°Op'L'iJ,Sj I6 / Lip3 I � I 33E N B311'__ 6 -qpp-PRC /,� 4fi�58'0'� 4g F'1''+��.Y% Ly25, J4, ld_d`7T 79'J ILL-56. 28'23.59'z `J. �N 69'S6'Sfi"E 67.00' 4= 3'56'18' 7 9' 1073.17' N89S617W 8 d=17' 56' 42'RL=BJ 50 d pJ 4g.7fi" 16" L=116. 63'u, N 895612 w 108558'u? -f—� e Y HAD N 8903'32"E - Im ':S III 10' 18 d �j R�Op 00' L-124 74'P N 89'S6'17W 7,T 49, 1.18 �o-m' R_ P1MAlE 5" 7000' _ - � o N 89'S6'S6"E I61.1 I' I. -S, 19.5' I a'ld'9p ( ST .5p' L- m -172. 65 - 8Y5fi912"W - n�44 29" 052125 1010_ 5 I 12 ice❑ 3 o 13 hl 15.54' 8.32' , I'« ryo m '.` 0 195' 0l �,1 14 m bll. J NBa56'S6'E I7D63' ^' ¢,39' 15 o\ _ \ _V, 16 15 17SI m m zp RAD-PRC 4 ' I N BT56'56E 100.50' 14 d P.19'75' lz z 1 e� z N 0'03'04W /a d'7P .7g' m� p N 89'56'WE I7716' 18.70' 4 ,1j. 30'O6" L�9 Iz 1554' N N 8652'29'W RAD ryJT� /ry�q 49'16' R d�'311,' L=70.77' 21.25' 50' L=195. 22' \s N 69'S6'12"W N 850031"E 36,79' 5657' J 3 __ N 8a5656E 18490 _ __ „ s _ _________ -N 78'48'04`W_III_64. RAD N BT56'S6E 231.54' _ NS _ N 89'32'33"E N B45656'E I78.97 z NI 44'S6'56'E b N 7848'04'W 10B.8I z III I7m• & m ----------- -- po a iT I li ;< Tfilsµ '—N 32'07a5"E 2 0 o 0 o D0a' RAD o 0 192 `esze'4rE 1310, m 2 7 110, 13 Ipb `Sc ,r. z 5 S� 27.39 IG N 8T56'S6"E 175.35' Jl E :o ig ��yji 19.5' 19.5' IIIz 3 Vf 6� 39' NII'IB'04'W III /3588' Lt 7 �-PNC85'11'20E 47Iq 9GIE � iN of o1�ov - 1 Na03•D4w N 89'565CE 6192' + '01➢o u\ �41.70' 60' L1 /� 30 1 89'S6'S6'E N -I 1592 60 00' T---LOT V Nvm'04"W ii}}•5C Y OS7 X 31.00' H N 1756.33W 75A5' XI' 30' N 89'5656'E 30.00' a�„� 1 ogV g29E1 N 89'S6'S6' E 69.00' N 003'04'W 10.00' 9.07' 1 ` 7,67' 45' N w e N 89'S6'S6"E N 8624 LOT D 3.33 Ac. �3574' � W, - N 895656'E 30.00' 30 00' - 250 00' m r H q'k —j LOT U,�.,8, ,.67 AG / SEE SHEET NOS. 9 do 10 N II _�W 9S n N 84'19_21 E_ � RAD-PRC �42 28' _ — _ — — — — — 2 _ _ _ _ — _ — _ - 87.62' e N 89'56'56'E 240.74' d=10' JI' 19' R�26. 50' L=151, 78' 597.DD' _ POMELO e=la 3l' I9' ROOD 28300' —� LOT D -Wl L=, 46.9P r PRI,MiE ST. 3.33 N Aa 1195' — I 3 10 _. — _ _ — 193 1214 AC. 193 sa 0 sa ma 0 SEE SHEET NOS. 9 k 10 1114 AC. I \39206\MAPPING\3035/-Is.Dwc 6-,7-0x 6 108 0 s �7 IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 16 OF 22 SHEETS TRACT NO. 30357 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RVERSIDE, STATE OF CAUFORNMw MDS CONSULTING AUGUST, 2001 GARY W. DOKICH L.S.4693 I I I PARC IL MAP II MOoo i �0��//LL�CC11 EASEMENTS paGu�oDo ��A�,IJ Q- INDICATES A 10.00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR PUBUC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT. PAR. I po /3 R2 G�11�( G/ 2❑- EASEMENT TO C.V.W.D. FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND SANITATION PURPOSES. FOOT EASEENT PURPOSES OTO PUBLIICEUTILITYO DEDICATED CITY OF IA OUINTA r Q- INDICATES A DRAINAGE EASEMENT EREON. AS SHOWN HEflEON. 7 EASEMENT TO C.V.W.D. FOR IRRIGATION CURVE TABLE No. DELTA PAUL' LENGRI PURPOSES. I S37'28' 500,00' 3IFY SEE SHEET 3 FOR SURVEYOR'S 2 906 35' 200.00' 28.31' NOTES AND BASIS OF BEARINGS SCALE 1"=50' 3 103VlT 82650' 15138' 4 1031'19" 800.00' 1469V 5 IR31'19' 773.50' IQG5' 6 3000'00" 52650' 275.6T 7 3000'00" 500.00' 261.80' Z 8 30'00'00" 4735024792' Z W N I W I N W FD. 2' I.P., RCE 8630, W FD. 1' I.P., RCE 16839, ON. OX NO REF. IN LIEU IN CONC.. ON. 0.4' PER OF I' I.P. RCE 16839 LOT DO PMB 112/68. PER PMB 1'21. I0.76 015 At. N 89'S6'I7 W 1073.17' 8' 1061,99- ��. N 0*03'41FE 10.00' LOT G N 85N689'S6'12'W5 025.00' VIA VALEROSA N D03'48'E 10.00' I f mo— 1.18 W. 993.95' PRAMTE ST. N 89'S6'12'W 927.46' h J�- 2 85.00 85.00' 85,00 85.00, 85,00' 85.W 99,00' r--- 85.00' — — — — s z17 18 19 m 20 m 21 m 22 m 23 m 24 m 25 m 26 ills � 8500' 8500' 8500' 85. Do' 8500' 85.00' 99.00' I6' 4 85.00' to N 89'56'12'W 878.32' N 0'03'49E 7.97' �y r� 1 192 im 2739 /L z z w N W � S N W N W W N 3 _—__-- --_—___ _ _— 4 N 79'3I 45' W IOp,00' — -- — — — — ' 2fi R�26.50 L-133.78' N 89'56'56' E 14597' 6 ,� — _ _ — N 19'77'45" W 10000' e ryN 1=19' 47' 45" R,973. 50' L=336. 35' POl T, } 16' per' 16 26' q�00. 00' L=129. 49' N 8T56'56' E 145,97' � 5 -per O �A�GL�,---`19. ]9'I1'45" W 0i 41'45' R=1000. 00' L-J45. 5D 100.00' PMIE yT 3.33 IF A-19' 47' 45' R=1026, 50' L=354.66' (_� p�'26" R=773. 50' L=125. 20' _ — — — — — — N 89'56'56' E 145 97' `� 8 '� — — — — T 1 —L 9 �Uf 1 93 — _ _ — — — — 2 u Ac SEE SHEET NO. 9 50 — 25 —0 — — — sa — _ too 150 SEE SHEET NOS. ImJ 1 14 9 & 11 i:�s6xoc�NAPPwa�smv-1 s.owc � o��m ©�� ou 0 •®11 I I m IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 30357 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. MDS CONSULTING AUGUST, 2001 GARY W. DOKICH L.S.4693 50 SEE SHEET NO. 21 48 /�� / /gs. IRS. / 47 / 4 7 �,D / I Jy. J /o / NFF y 46 z SCALE 1"=50' PARCEL 2 PARCEL IYIAP NO, -13327 RiNAD.-1-12/63 TO. 1' I.P.• No TAG, IN DN. 0.5'• PER CONC., PMB 112/6R. m g ///""�""''' LOT DO / 0T5107 N 69'S6'12'W 1077.I7' ' 1061.99' o F_ � N 69'Sfi'12 W I065.56' in A VA T L�DO�rA \ N 9T56'12'W 1025.00' Ilt1 IAMB S ' 997.92 11B AC. �' N 8T56'12"W 927.46' LOT G n = 7 • 50 26 d 27 d 28 sPow +02j 45 N 58J5. cby / NSA 34 2 8 ,F/ SgJs. LOT EE 5' 0.47W / 5 0 33 l-93• a''/ NSd 9 0�, / �; ,5•/ /� 32 S w / Sq�, ^off Sr"^g 31 6 N 8 Bw e a 31.05' tih o /Sszs, h aa' °' a'W j 773�d��}1 b8 30 4 29 EASEMENTS 7�- INDICATES A 10.DD FOOT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT. SHEET 17 OF 22 SHEETS SEE SHEET NO. 21 \I 37 s 36 �^ sy 9 F� NSv sew 4; / 35 n° 12 N O SOPo 8 Z a W N 192 27.% W. N Ali ❑2 - EASEMENT TO C.V.W.D. FOR DOMESTIC 192 N 6602'56•E / 1000' WATER AND SANITATION PURPOSES. �� /\f Z � J ❑S - INDICATES A 10,00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR ( r� N 23'S7'04'W WCltt PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO OF U QUINTA 2530' �j ❑4 - INDICATES A PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON. \ N 2S57'04"W 74 W 27.16' \ \ O \/ g SEE SHEET 3 FOR SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND BASIS OF BEMINGS 75 QSs,\ ss,\ 76 14597' N 9,56'5 E — — d=JO' 00, 192 N 145.97' 89'S6'S6"E 00' R=526 Sp' 2739 Ar. Jz. w N E�ZIS PO]T L0-6)�•vq"�.\ N /0 145.97' NN 89'56.56E R-5 \ da70' LOr 0.00'(_21, oD oo R-07J. ?•u•k — — _ 50,4SEE SHEET NO. 11 o SEE SHEET NOS. 11, 12 & 18 1 3 10' 193 _ e� 6o0J.\ 50 P5 0 1214 oV '� 50 100 150 c\38m6\—Pinc\3mv- 7 DWG 1 —2 1.1.0 r 1 9 ,, Y IN THE CffY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, SPATE OF CALIFORNIASHEET 18 OF 22 SHEETS 37 TRACT N0. 3035'7BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. MDS CONSULTING AUGUST, 2001 GARY W. DOKICH L.S.4693 36 y4 SEE SHEET NO 21 SEE SHEET NOS. 19 & 21 ° 192 f 58/ i ry�r sF 59,� 192 35 R TABLE ;� "s' s'y�60 , j y�.& ti '~ Na. I DELTA 9P000T RADIUS 2350' LENGTH 34.47' ? b- mod• '% /2 2 3 3545'00" 14'23'Ol' 119.50 119.50' 74.56' 3111' ° + 61 EASEMENTS 4 21'45'00' R.'4 100.00' J0.56' 3796' 7 S� 7Q- INDICATES A 10.00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR 5 6 7 21'4500 21'45'00" T16'00" 119.50' fi69.50' 45.36' IA60' P'�N 'Oo- .), l PUBLIC UTPURPOSES DEDICATED TO IRRIGATION DISTRICT. B I'I6'00" 51950' II.4B' �;%� n = d .o 62 �npSp� sJ 6'�, �� Z IMPERIAL ❑2 - EASEMENT TO C.V.W.D. FOR DOMESTIC 9 10 5'S2'79" 1646'ST 320.50' 320.50' 2N. 91.88' q` 3, qv ti q2, Q �i' w e ya " 1 00 tj W WATER AND SANITATION PURPOSES. IT 9'77' T }2p.5p' S3.82' be' �° N W Q- INDICATES A 10.00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO CITY OF LA QUINTA I2 IJ 5307'49 15'OS'42" 23.50' 2350 21.79' 6.19 63 e, y \ N o 452 �/ aq� I �` a' ti '�8 N ©- INDICATES A PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON. o ^y q° 'PS- �7 a - ,0. q0. 64 % ,ti u,1 >E 192 N y ,' q q� o�, - 59 �� 8 65 A. g ` a e 101 5 "Po a°° g W 102 y 103 66 /�a Jg. �1LOT JJ - g5 W /.vs, � 0.00 ,Y.' a N N sg. PoOpW , / 43.57' iJ1,15' N 80'45'Op'W 51583' 67 60 Op' 68 ag ° 116 g 115 w Z N 8 Sg�Po� $ - a 114 g �113 °Po P 112 }Yy 69 / '` "Sg 4 & Nsg, aJ Poa°• q 56.76' N Po SCALE 1-50' 8 ° 8 — jj77LL�� 70 sT 514 _ N 8P45'00'19' SOT W 586.52' 'L—� h 49' 60.00 Nos4 ,�, ry 60.00' N e0-95'00'W /77.966000, ' rs 71 8 s� 'Ll 0� g 77 o s 192 72 / LOT II 78 s 79 - 80 g 81 Ac. O A4 82 126.55' W z N 73 pS9�, �" PoNk / 6000' 60.00' W N 8045'00"W fi0655' 60.00' 74 Z Z 75 OF �g 7v rs0p0 / w >, 76 SgPo' J 191 �4'' \o��ONBrO rtgJ r ry / J V14 AG 191 .NAG° a��e\ssi` / 37E4 IC. 192 2719 AC. a��=1 �>9J jz0'WD� pry° SEE SHEEP NOS. 11 4 & 12 SEE SHEET O ti1ry tis / S $ /RAO N I'`4/1'47E 12l v �' NOS. 11 & 12 6yb a� l� �gS � N 'f✓y Jew �'�'� 117 SHEET •:$ 191 i Jg 118 NOSE 11 50 25 0 NOTES AND BASIS OF BEARINGS 56 100 150 1 1 9 i �Texos�Nrawnc�To3si-leowc s IN THE CrrY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CAUFORNIA SHEET 19 OF 22 SHEETS TRACT NO. 30357 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. MDS CONSULTING AUGUST, 2001 GARY W. OOKICH L.S.4693 I 39, EASEMENTS SEE SHEET NO. 21 192 195 195, SEE SHEET NO. 22 Q- INDICATES A IOOD FOOT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO I 3 / CURVE TABLE IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT. RA° �^ N,, DELTA RADIUS LENGTH 0- EASEMENT TO C.V.W.O. FOR DOMESTIC ham" &, A' 61 TJ°, 5 1 9900'00' 2350' 3691' WATER AND SANITATION PURPOSES. A hyy�• Po'W 75 �0 1 J 2 35'45'OCT 80.50' 50.23' 3❑- INDICATES A 10.00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR otiho"o„�y °Op'��/ � 191 3 9'06'08' 108.50' 17.24' PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO �o 37.84 CITY OF LA DDINTA rye. / 4 626'4T 108.50' 12 97' A❑- INDICATES A PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT P40 5 ff57'1' 175008 491 e ya �'' S7 / fi 9857'IS" 5750' 9931' AS SHOWN HEREON. }^' N �� ti 7 709'21" 5150' 3.17' ry-y= �q6• No & / 8 S28'57 57.59 349' 9 8'15'27' 207,5029,91' 10 21T21'0 57.50' 2845' N 11 s'3B'se' 1o65D' 1a7' o 192 J$, /o'wo 0 op 2 7'27'IO' 108.50' 6.54' 27.m /�, ,,5p $� / o'�„�,o ,gyp / 13 35450C 11950' 7kW _ 14 8945'00" 33.50' 4T21' -$. 15 9915'00' 33.50' S803' ed6� N'J� 59 �p / 16 9'22'49' 20750' 339T N SCALE 1"-50' W N 6��N ,J50'78 W 1000' N 54.44' N 80'45'00"W s'SAt,.4� ti 6254' 17951 61 ��° Off. -,`�A \y. 6254, N 6J16'19'W 76.22' I0 10q 64.62' A_14' l0' /bp 5, cP L=51 JJ` 1160' .34' 6 d,J 191 1 00 le JJ. 37J4 W- _ s• o 62 v 0J• z / ;� LOT KK Ac a 99 98 J / a 0.04 9 N9J Qi N aoo'oo°E I900' tig a 97 S� 96 N / �N ✓$$� RAD N 4500'00"E 1000' a tig 8 95 63 - W N 59y °v . 9.90- la LO62 4p - - bl it d 172�140 U "�'+U/EU 680•{ ,ry °`1711=Fft"IE s7,L-�AiN8P45'00.W 2J6.$g.5760 14 N89'S1'08'W 4, .48 J1. p09� p �2 ,44 S6,-60.10' T M-1s Ac 295.67 OO W 33fi.03' _ 3 50.0�0'ry 7 64 t°°o +�� 1006' - - 60.00' N 8P45'00`ly 290.96' ry - �' 6 94 10, o° 1 3 r TTT 6600.00' a r �. �. op O S - 40.90' RAD 101 2 102 _� S 14 � a i� N 9a00'00"E 150.20' N 8826'47'W - _ r •^ S �' ��____ -----r 9 65 LOT JJ y 103 k 9s o gl e N 6aRAo49'w --- g GM AC. W 104 � 105 106 w o� 93 1P07b 3� N 90'00'00'E 150.00' J9• 60.00' N 80'45'10"W 39' S. 60 p0 6000' 51583' 2 IO 1 3 000, 60.00' J o N 640060.00' a 60.00 8J68, - ^ N9a00'00'E 150.00' o= 116 115 Z o 6°oa 52.26' o o b w E W 114W s 113 o e =NW 112 k 111 - g g LOT LL-11 _ �I 91 s VWi k 1 1 0 = TI•� _ V= N 90,00'00°E 150.00, N - - - 109 s 108 39, = 19.5' NI _ s ~Y3 90 o s RACINA N 80'45'00"W 0 60.00'- 8 y& 9.5' o N 90'00'00'E 151.96' - - - P"7E- 531 J945PW 586.SY 60,00' 60.00'- - 00 W 47796' LOT'�- 4743' 6080. 6D.00. N os4AIC "�_ 10 89 co 60 --60.00' _-53.A7' a 3 ""-`r'-54.13' ,V`i S� RA°N)0'45. 78 79 Z _ ,11 °° N_ 4 e� rya °°`W I1%}I- 12 I N 17\851, d=11T 27' 36O yAM1" 15000. 80 W g 81 S 1 W d�6 4fi' Og N V g 82 LLLIII S ��,I L>6.94. W a V 83 88 N - 84 S 85 5 86 �g I 60.00' R V / $ ti 911 I'll, 0.00 a ti ti N eP45'00"W 606.55' 60.00, C d �p N 60.00• I W 5 W60.00' Irk Pryp Z N 16 - 9 W 1 1 N 6851'2fi =4 W 2691' A0' 10' 45" N 191 37.84 X 37.04 AC. w N SEE SHEET NO. 11 SEE SHEET NO. 11 SEE SHEET 3 FOR SURVEYOR'S sD zs o 50 too tsD NOTES AND BASIS OF BEARINGS I\382Q6\lAPPlN6\emm-19.owc 6-17-12 112 0244 IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 20 OF 22 SHEETS TRACT NO. 30357 SEE SHEET NO. 22 FSECTION RANGE 7 SUBDIVISIONBEING A EAST. SAN BRNARDINOM MERIDIAN, N THE CITY OFLAQUINTA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATEOFCAUFORNIA. 159 MDS CONSULTING AUGUST, 2001 GARY W. DOKICH LS.4693 N 89'41'55'E 150.00' 1 3 ID 2 SEE SHEET NO. 19 & 22 95 94 I 4 4 WEST 60.62' ___T_-_� _________ - 93 1_ Z W 92 s N o W N 91 90 89 88 EASEMENTS IQ- INDICATES A moo FOOT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT. �2 - EASEMENT TO GV.W.D. FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND SANITATION PURPOSES. INDICATES A 10.00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO CITY OF IA QUINTA qQ- INDICATES A PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON. SEE SHEET 3 FOR SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND BASIS OF BEARINGS d Ad O Z _ fA w rn SEE SHEET NO. 11 & 14 191 37.64 AC. r a I � 160 s m m as N 89'41'S5'E 150.00' 8 e s 161 0 m m d- 4 4 I RAD N 89'43'O6"W -wa e d ^ ------ ____ 6 N89'41'S5"E E�z L T N 8441'55"E 199.27' N 893647' I5001' o N RAD o =' - I� — 162 �qw 163 �. as N _7975'Oe'W � RAD-ARC Io 5 N �g440 IW i N 89'41'55'E 152 22' N 81'29'4i"W RAD 2 - �l Ia Ci 'rw I o 164 a o W RAD la m SCALE 1"=50' N 8941'55'E I50.17' N 8717'04'W n _ m N 8752'28"W w RAD O ry N 85'�b 35"E N B941'S5'E 15D 44' 191 37.0 W- .o _ ___ a 166 A N t3sa'Sa'E — — " MD-PRCC3 141'55'E 152.37' F N 8GI R'p 167 168 FAD II 4 0,* B , a -- ---- -- to N OT41'55'E 150.00' N 19'41155'E - g 169 gas b N 8941'55E 15000' m s 170 CURVE TABLE No. DELTA RADIUS LENGTH _ 1 0'34'59' 98250' 1000' o N 89'41'55'E 15000' 2 O'09'33 982.50' 2.73' 3 1'20'36 982,50' 2704' 4 U23'4T 767.50' 5.29' 10 191 5 1'54'34" 767.50' 25.58' 1 3 2 37M AG 6 0'41'18" 832.50' 10.00' o 171 Im N 89'41'55'E 150D0' 172 50 25 0 50 100 150 SEE SHEET N0. 14 C) i 7 :��ms7-zo awc -v-oz PAR3FL 9 - PARCEL j\/JAP N 0.10VW2850.56, JN10, 13327 - P.IMB, 112/63 � to v 213,70209.03' 24.11 20.00' 3000' m EOA .3/4' I.E., llo Rio RCE 16839, r ON. 0.4' IN CONC.. .l / ' O PER PMB 112/68. l� 20' 30' MI s c Ul a /lam 50' O IT1 A �5 4� .fps, 2q� O Ul a gl { Ln 6 (%1 N=224' I4' 9J. Sp 7� 4 00 �. o LA\S�F 1 �O N O'45'00'W 152,11' N 738'J6'E N 710'35'C 4 A o RAO Un W - eo�0p93p �V 1�'lJZ \yCY MSCj%2s\> m O A cam. pp !•/ J 9 8" yc• \JS, W m —i 650'12'E RAO-PRC LA i J/ Ln �� r- .O� \ p. \:oyD LA Sco . / 18 � m 2n J m a• o p /• moo` V d� \b. 1.\. �yL``,' A a6'� ,'N fi39'S3`W ; di i In ao s ems. �a4'' v m n o c z el Y E r o No O 0 2RA0 ,w - a y� 5 N 905725E lC8' N 905'2TE 15.42" LA Do, moo- N 1'27'39'W o < y ---- --- m 4p e, \�:s 'atcv Rno z p U �� o,r�s,�. y p m an « O n c�iSVC� 7c �,ggg.a"4 icy F,oz Oo m-m�gog�QQ�agoo oog� ,,o•I�� oA � °��a\�- _- � t� o�p o ono aagsogo- o.� 6tRAD N 5 I656'E £ m Iti g• �13- L� N 650'52- 1' /� n RAO-PRC � '� . `i � � p\ O w � o N p51 MA0'9t'y1 N \ 1 - z itg o@@ a m T u GW 4a 5�� o mm� � IN AIu' X W UiS my �3- coiNd31'0,, 15000' iIf P 20' 30' o> >99 �F Hs rng o - - m mob' y -S' 10' m b- ��,T30'066W 150.00' MY 19.5' u 20' 11 A-"^ N 'ai \p O o R _ (n 1jp 1 N p ED S. Ln p d, \v p m J<b \ �\�✓s. N60 PRC O \lo L\ v r V 20' �� o fiti ti 56 SEE SHEET NOS. 19 & 22 SEE SHEET NO. 22 f` �„- m / �-n \ul SEE SHEET NOS 19 k 21 / SEE SHEET NO. 21 / m /�� G. '� OJ � �, ``w� �a s-1 m x rn \ $ }gam ao�,ay-Vor lm �. z 7C \ \ oo tD - SC co V _ to (.n IBM NONE N 905.59E 70 69' 1 z o LOT X a49 X 90 '00>ll g'I 19.5' 5J. 48� _ of MY � ��I N 10'S0'00'E - - \ J�U O m 88.00' pp�lr sr. N 10'50'00"E 88.00' r m N6p00559 E\ J. P�,N A554000 a - o E 0 `� N 905'S9"E �P<" 250.13 _N=050'0p^F 8800' 1790'�, ?; 18259"y� a N 905'S9"E /SN 89'Sf'01"W U 0 R 20.00' 30.00' 1650' -763 o p\ nil} 19.5' bo �\o i' �c. �. �I \1�g V \ F LOT Y osl �,hf 905'59"E 70.69' A m a N \(" � \ �"r� /7J 4 c \ �" 1 - _ , i iM6y44tlC yap"• m N 905'59'E 145.15' Z M �Z'ptln m VAR. VAR. a N O ITT 17.5' I O � w C Z p;gmg Z.m- 35 5 _ � o MD-1 0 `° t7s� �R��B��E�� $� Aa =3� �� 30 1 a 10• z Z a o 8A$ goo N 905' S9' E 15000 Cn N o og�o71pgp� O C.�1 m o = W N O'05'59 E 15000' IR y J % r N A� o p w s �o o e3 I1 z �o Nza Nnp "� G07 �v vv fJ9 O 30 v 5��', K ks s m 74 N Q� drJrf y e z°5'oo E y' ,74 7{96,1 4, Z- o N myy9 0f r'r N 918'05W 34M' N 1'19'4SE 7721' 85.00' 85.00' •6cb, / ^o y ^v'.I m o_ o o I L5 C, m SEl z. rya �}, `lr o�' '� r N 546'SYE 1 O _ [o CO _ V / ti�ti``� �d4 �--�p0 O'OS'S9"E I7.48' Iv r Z / 1� > \ O'OS'S9'E 19.02' IS O O N4'Z-, E m ro - q5g'' ti�ti di4 cAq,� t:7 RAD r0 D G_p? .O6'9S-i ,6L5 ,BSA tl�o ,o ,�'y a� N 6'S1'2TEi �mn ——85.00'- 85.00' 66.00' �, m "r N 91805W 406.00EL DORADO DR. —�„ �� y4 I-1 N 6 l / V ro — P10WAIE A. — a`p 2"E 10.D0y ©\ L_________ _ 1� 10' 30' 2801G OU` 0 N PIB'OS'W 406.00' a N tl .6L �\i � O - —LOT HH- — — — 95 181 N 89„ YE 1574> o NfM 1.14 AC. 2105.95' flAO-tf-66127 25.82' \ 23927' 76.79' 0.00 }000' fM o/ N 91805•W 2603.78' lV p l so ,o m TRACT NJ.-14,J04 — ,\il.>S. 1-12/8/-60 � � 1 � 115 ATTACHMENT 3 CITY OF LA QUINTA SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT Tract Map 30357 - Onsite Improvements THIS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement') is made and entered into this day of 120 by and between Toll Brothers, Inc., a California Limited Liability Company, hereinafter referred to as "Subdivider," and the City of La Quinta, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City." RECITALS: A. Subdivider has prepared and filed a final map (the "Map') of a unit of land in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, which unit of land is known as Tract Map No. 30357 (the "Tract') pursuant to the provisions of Section 66410, et sec. of the California Government Code (the "Subdivision Map Act'). B. Prior to approval of the Map, Subdivider is required to install or agree to install certain public and private improvements (the "Improvements'). C. The Improvements have not been installed and accepted at this time. D. It is therefore necessary that Subdivider and City enter into an agreement for the installation of the Improvements as provided in Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Improvement Plans. Prior to submittal of the Map for approval by the City Council, Subdivider shall furnish original improvement plans meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. 2. Improvements. Subdivider shall construct the public and private street, drainage, utility, landscaping, and other improvements required to be constructed or agreed to be constructed under this Agreement as listed in Exhibit "A", and shall bear the full cost thereof. The methods, standards, specifications, sequence, and scheduling of construction shall be as approved by the City Engineer. 3. Improvement Security. A. One class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "performance security, shall assure the faithful performance of this Agreement including construction of the Improvements, payment of Subdivider's fair share of Improvements which have been or will be constructed by others ("Participatory Improvements"), and payment of plan check and permit fees. A second class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "payment security," shall assure the payment of the cost of labor, equipment and materials supplied to construct the Improvements. A third class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "warranty security," shall serve as a guarantee and warranty of the Improvements for a period of one year following the completion and acceptance of the Improvements. Subdivider shall furnish performance and payment security prior to and as a condition of City Council approval of the Map. Subdivider shall provide warranty security after Improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council and prior to or concurrently with the final release of performance security. Warranty security shall not be required for Monumentation or Participatory Improvements. However, the City may utilize Monumentation Security for performance of or payment for the work in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. As part of the obligation secured by each of the performance security, payment security and warranty security, and in addition to the face amount of each such security, each such security shall include and assure the payment of costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing the obligations thereby secured. B. Improvement security shall conform with Section 66499 of the California Government Code and one or more of the following: 1.113 1) A cash deposit with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company, at City's option. 02 8 T: \PWD EPT\Devd iv\Agreements\SIA\30357-Onsite mpd 2) Surety bonds, of the form specified in subsection 66499.2 of the California Government Code, issued by a surety or sureties listed in the U.S. Department of Treasury Circular 570 (latest version). 3) Certificates of deposit, in City's name, from one or more financial institutions subject to regulation by the state or federal government and having a financial quality rating of "A" or better and a commitment reliability rating of "R-2" or better on the Investment Data Exchange (of the Los Angeles County Treasurer's office). 4) Irrevocable letters of credit, issued by one or more financial institutions meeting the requirements of Paragraph (3), pledging that the funds necessary to carry out the completion of the Improvements are on deposit, guaranteed for payment, and constitute a trust fund which is not subject to levy or attachment by any creditor of the depositor until released by City. Letters of credit shall guarantee that all or any portion of the funds available pursuant to the letters of credit will be paid upon the written demand of City and that such written demand need not present documentation of any type as a condition of payment, including proof of loss. The duration of any such letter of credit shall be for a period of not less than one year from the execution of the agreement with which it is provided and shall state, on its face, that the letter of credit will be automatically renewed until such time that City authorizes its expiration or until sixty (60) days after City receives notice from the financial institution of intent to allow expiration of the letter of credit. 5) A lien upon the subdivided property, if City finds that it would not be in the public interest to require the installation of the Improvements sooner than two (2) years after recordation of the final map or parcel map for which the Improvements are required. The lien shall provide a collateral value of three (3) times the estimated cost of the Improvements and shall include the power of sale of the real property, all buildings and improvements thereon, or that may be erected upon or made thereto, together with all hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in any wise appertaining, and the reservations, remainders, rents, issues, and profits thereof. The collateral value of the property shall be established at Subdivider's expense through an appraisal approved by City. 6) An instrument of credit from an agency of the state, federal or local government, when any agency of the state, federal, or local government provides at least Twenty Percent (20%) of the financing for the Improvements. 7) When Subdivider is a non-profit organization, security may be negotiable bonds, of the kind approved for securing deposits of public moneys with City or in favor of City, as specified in Section 16430 of the California Government Code, deposited, at City's option, with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company. C. All securities shall be furnished in accordance with the provisions of Exhibit A. The amount of the performance security shall equal One Hundred Percent (100%) of the estimated cost of constructing the Improvements, including payment of plan check and permit fees, as estimated by the City Engineer or a duly authorized representative of the City Engineer. The amount of Payment security shall equal the amount of the amount of performance security, except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A, and shall be furnished as a separate security. Warranty security shall equal Ten Percent (10%) of the amount of performance security except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A. D. At the time of submittal of security, Subdivider shall pay to City administrative fees applicable to the form of security provided. Administrative fees shall apply to the subdivision (final map, parcel map or waiver of parcel map) rather than to individual security instruments. The fees shall be paid separately for each different form and/or source (surety or financial institution) of security initially submitted and for substitution of securities but shall not be required for submittal of warranty security if the warranty security is of the same form and from the same source as the performance security it replaces. Administrative fees for security shall be as follows: 1) For certificates of deposit, bonds and letters of credit as described in Paragraphs 2), 3) and 4) of SECTION 3.B., which require the establishment of evidence of the reliability of the surety or financial institution, the administrative fee shall be One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00). 2) For liens on real property as described in Paragraph 5) of SECTION 3.B., for which City will prepare lien agreements and subordination agreements, administer valuation of the real property and administer 029 T: \PWD EPT\Devdiv\Agreements\SIA\30357-0nsite.wpd the agreements over the life of the lien, all of which require legal assistance and financial advice, Subdivider shall pay to City an administration fee of One Half of One Percent (0.5%) of the estimated cost of the improvements secured but not less than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) nor more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00). 3) For other forms of security listed in Section 3 B, above, there will be no administrative fee. E. Participatory Improvements, if any, are identified in Exhibit A. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place until the Participatory Improvements are constructed and actual costs are known and paid by Subdivider, or until Subdivider pays to City the estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements, and shall guarantee the reimbursement by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost of the Participatory Improvements. Payment security and warranty security shall not be required for Participatory Improvements. Upon written demand from City, Subdivider shall deposit cash with City in lieu of or in replacement of security guaranteeing Participatory Improvements. If Subdivider fails to deposit said cash within 30 days of the date of the written demand from City, City may present a written demand to Subdivider's Surety for payment of said cash and Subdivider's Surety shall pay to City the lesser of: 1) the amount demanded, or 2) the amount of the security. F. Security shall not expire, be reduced or become wholly or partially invalid for any reason, including non-payment of premiums, modifications of this Agreement and/or expiration of the time for performance stated in this Agreement, without express authorization from City unless the surety provides City with sixty (60) days written notice by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. G. Security shall be released in the following manner: 1) Performance security shall be released upon the final completion and acceptance or approval, by the City Council of the Improvements subject to the provisions of paragraph B. 2) The City Engineer may authorize partial reduction of performance security as work progresses, upon application by Subdivider. However, no such reduction shall be for an amount less than Ten Percent (10%) of the total performance security provided for the faithful performance of the act or work. In no event shall security be reduced below that required to guarantee the completion of the act or work or obligation secured, plus Ten Percent (10%). The City Engineer shall not allow more than two partial reductions of security furnished for any improvement agreement. 3) Participatory Improvement security shall be released upon payment by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost or estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements. 4) If City receives no notice of recorded claims of lien, labor and materials security shall be released in full 90 days after final acceptance and/or approval by the City Council, of the Improvements. If City receives notice of any recorded lien, the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act shall apply. 5) Warranty security not utilized during the warranty period shall be released one year after final acceptance or approval by the City Council of all Tract Improvements. However, if at the end of the one-year warranty period, there are one or more outstanding requests by City for performance of work or provision of materials under the terms of the warranty, warranty security shall be retained until the outstanding requests are satisfied or until Subdivider has made other arrangements satisfactory to the City Engineer. 4. Permits Required. Prior to commencing any phase of work, Subdivider shall obtain all permits required for that phase of work and pay all required fees. Work performed under a permit or permits shall comply with all provisions of the required permits. 5. Off -site Improvements. When the construction of one or more of the Improvements requires or necessitates the acquisition of real property not owned by Subdivider or City, Subdivider shall use its best efforts purchase such real property at a reasonable price. In the event that Subdivider is unsuccessful, despite its best cc�� efforts, to acquire such real property at a reasonable price, Subdivider may request in writing that City attempts 1 Q to acquire such real property. City may, but is not required to, agree to attempt to acquire such real property on behalf of Subdivider. If City so agrees, City and Subdivider shall enter a separate written agreement in a form 3 T: \PW D EPT\Devd iv\A greements\S IA\30357-Onsite .wpd acceptable to the City Attorney. Said separate agreement shall provide that Subdivider advance to City One Hundred Fifty Percent (150%) of the appraised fair market value of the real property. Any unexpended portion of said advance shall be refunded to Subdivider. Any additional funds required for acquisition of the real property shall be paid by Subdivider to City upon the conveyance of said real property to Subdivider. In no event shall the failure of Subdivider or City to acquire such real property excuse, waive, or otherwise terminate Subdivider's obligation to construct the applicable improvement pursuant to this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval. 6. Completion of Improvements. Subdivider shall begin construction of the Improvements within ninety (90) days and shall complete construction within twelve (12) months after the approval of this Agreement. Portions of the Improvements may be completed at a later date, as determined by the City Engineer or as set forth in Exhibit A. Failure by Subdivider to begin or complete construction of the Improvements within the specified time periods shall constitute cause for City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare Subdivider in default of this agreement, to revise improvement security requirements as necessary to ensure completion of the improvements, and/or to require modifications in the standards or sequencing of the Improvements in response to changes in standards or conditions affecting or affected by the Improvements. Said failure shall not otherwise affect the validity of this agreement or Subdivider's obligations hereunder. 7. Force Mae ure. In the event that Subdivider is unable to perform within the time limits herein due to strikes, act of God, or other events beyond Subdivider's control, the time limits for obligations affected by such events will be extended by the period of such events. 8. Time Extension. Subdivider may make application in writing to the City Council for an extension of time for completion of the Improvements. The City Council, in its sole and absolute discretion, may approve or deny the request or conditionally approve the extension with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. As a condition of the time extension, Subdivider shall furnish securities, similar in form and substance to those required in SECTION 3 hereinabove, to cover the period of extension. The value of the securities shall be sufficient to ensure the performance of and payment for Improvements that remain incomplete at the time of the extension, and to provide warranty security on completed Improvements. 9. Survey Monuments. Before final approval of street improvements, Subdivider shall place survey monuments in accordance with the provisions of Sections 66495, et sec. of the Subdivision Map Act and of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Subdivider shall provide the City Engineer written proof that the monuments have been set, evidence of payment and receipt thereof by the engineer or surveyor setting the monuments, and intersection monument tie -outs for monuments set in public streets. 10. Final Acceptance of Improvements. At the completion of construction and prior to acceptance of the Improvements by City, Subdivider shall submit a request for final approval by City. The request shall be accompanied by any required certifications from Subdivider's engineers or surveyors, approval letters from other agencies having jurisdiction over and approval authority for improvements required by this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval, and any required construction quality documentation not previously submitted. Upon receipt of said request, the City Engineer or a duly -authorized representative will review the required documentation and will inspect the Improvements. If the Improvements are determined to be in accordance with applicable City standards and specifications, and as provided herein, obligations required by the Conditions of Approval and this Agreement have been satisfied, and Subdivider has provided revised plans as required in Paragraph 11, hereinafter, the City Engineer shall recommend acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council. 11. Revisions to Plans. When the Improvements have been inspected and approved by the City Engineer, Subdivider shall make any necessary revisions to the original plans held by City so the plans depict the actual Improvements constructed. When necessary revisions have been made, each separate sheet of the plans shall be clearly marked with the words "As -Built," "As -Constructed," or "Record Drawing," the marking shall be stamped 11 by an engineer or surveyor, as appropriate for the improvements thereon, who is licensed to practice in California, �. 1 and the plans shall be resubmitted to the City Engineer. (� r, 031 T: \PW DEPT\Devdiv\Agreements\S IA\30357-Onsite.wpd 12. Improvement Warranty. Subdivider hereby guarantees the Improvements to City for a period of one (1) year, beginning on the date of final acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council, against any defective work or labor done, or defective materials furnished, and shall repair or replace such defective work or materials. 13. Release of Security. City shall retain and release securities in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of this agreement. Prior to the release of payment security, the City Engineer may require Subdivider to provide a title report or other evidence sufficient to show claims of lien, if any, that may affect the amount of payment security released. 14. City Right to Cure. If Subdivider fails to perform any obligation hereunder and such obligation has not been performed within sixty (60) days after written notice of default from City, then City may perform the obligation, and Subdivider shall pay the entire cost of such performance by City including costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing such obligation. In cases of emergency or compelling public interest, as determined by the City Engineer, the requirement for written notice of default and/or the passage of sixty (60) days shall be deemed waived and all other provisions of this Article shall remain in effect. 15. Indemnification. Subdivider hereby binds itself, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, executors, administrators, guarantors, heirs, and assigns, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold City and its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and assigns harmless from and against any losses, claims, demands, actions, or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, arising out of or in any way connected with Subdivider's performance herein under, including costs of suit and reasonable attorneys' fees. 16. No Modification of Conditions. This Agreement shall in no respect act to modify or amend any provision of the Conditions of Approval. In the event that any requirement or condition of this Agreement is inconsistent with or fails to include one or more provisions of the Conditions of Approval, which document(s) is (are) incorporated herein by reference, the provisions in the Conditions of Approval shall remain in effect and shall control. 17. Severability. In the event that any provision or provisions of this Agreement are held unenforceable, all provisions not so held shall remain in full force and effect. 18. General Provisions A. All notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the parties at their respective addresses indicated hereon. Notices personally delivered shall be effective upon delivery. Notices mailed as provided herein and sent postage prepaid shall be effective upon the date of delivery or refusal indicated on the return receipt. Either party may change its address for notices hereunder by notice to the other given in the manner provided in this subparagraph. B. The terms, conditions, covenants, and agreements set forth herein shall apply to and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors of the parties hereto. C. Neither party to this Agreement relies upon any warranty or representation not contained in this Agreement. D. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted with respect to the laws of the State of California. E. In the event of any dispute between the parties with respect to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to prompt payment of its reasonable attorneys' fees from the non -prevailing party. F. Any failure or delay by either party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any such rights or remedies provided for hereunder. .1. 2 0 032 T: \PWD EPT\Devdiv\Agreements\SIA\30357-0nsite.wpd IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. CITY: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 760/777-7075 Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Date ATTEST: City Clerk SUBDIVIDER: TOLL BROTHERS INC. Regional Manager Mr. Gary Lemon 74-923 Hovley Lane #2-220 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Tel. No. (760) 674-9389 By: Date Title: By: Date Title: Reviewed and Approved: City ngineer Date Approved as to Form: City Attorney Date 121 03�� T: \P W D EPT\Devd iv\A greements\S IA\30357-0 ns ite.wpd Exhibit A SECURITY - TRACT MAP 30357 ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS Except as otherwise provided herein, Subdivider shall furnish performance security and labor & materials security prior to agendization of the Map for approval by the City Council. Improvements designated as "Participatory' have been or will be constructed by others. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place indefinitely until called upon or released by City. The "Engineering & Plans" security will be released when the City has possession of complete, approved, original plans, signed and sealed by a design professional(s), for all required improvements. The "No -Plan Contingency", which may be utilized for any listed item or for other cost found necessary in the design or construction of the required improvements, may be released in whole or part by the City Engineer, at any time after construction plans are complete and the scope and nature of improvements are fully known. These releases shall be separate from and in addition to the reductions discussed below. As elements of the work are completed, Subdivider may request a maximum of two partial releases of performance security. Partial releases shall be for not less than ten percent (10%) of the total performance security for the tract and shall not reduce total performance security below the amount necessary to complete the Improvements plus ten percent (10%) of the original amount. Partial releases of performance security will be evaluated and may be granted, in whole or in part, by the City Engineer. Requests for partial releases, setting forth in detail the amount of work completed and the value thereof, shall be made in writing to the City Engineer. Labor & materials security shall remain in place until 90 days after all required tract improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council. Improvement Description Performance Labor & Materials Grading (50% Complete) $1,053,000 $2,106,000 On Site Streets $1,204,226 $1,204,226 Domestic Water $1,456,860 $1,456,860 Sanitary Sewer $983,375 $983,375 Storm Drain $1,332,501 $1,332,501 Dry Utilities (Elect.) $445,000 $445,000 C.V.W.D. Well Site & Gate $106,261 $106,261 Irrigation Lateral 1208-0.41-1.25 Replacement $66,485 $66,485 Monumentation $57,980 (0) Construction Subtotal: $ 6,705,688 $7,700,708 Professional Fees Design & Construction (15%) $1,005,853 $7,711,541 Contingency (20% of Project) $1,542,308 Total: $9,253,849 1 2 0- 034 CITY OF LA QUINTA SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT Tract Map 30357 - Offsite Improvements THIS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (the 'Agreement) is made and entered into this day of 20 by and between Toll Brothers, Inc., a California Limited Liability Company, hereinafter referred to as "Subdivider," and the City of La Quinta, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City." RECITALS: A. Subdivider has prepared and filed a final map (the "Map') of a unit of land in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, which unit of land is known as Tract Map No. 30357 (the "Tract') pursuant to the provisions of Section 66410, et sec. of the California Government Code (the "Subdivision Map Act'). B. Prior to approval of the Map, Subdivider is required to install or agree to install certain public and private improvements (the "Improvements'). C. The Improvements have not been installed and accepted at this time. D. It is therefore necessary that Subdivider and City enter into an agreement for the installation of the Improvements as provided in Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Improvement Plans. Prior to submittal of the Map for approval by the City Council, Subdivider shall furnish original improvement plans meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. 2. Improvements. Subdivider shall construct the public and private street, drainage, utility, landscaping, and other improvements required to be constructed or agreed to be constructed under this Agreement as listed in Exhibit "A", and shall bear the full cost thereof. The methods, standards, specifications, sequence, and scheduling of construction shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement Security. A. One class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "performance security," shall assure the faithful performance of this Agreement including construction of the Improvements, payment of Subdivider's fair share of Improvements which have been or will be constructed by others ("Participatory Improvements"), and payment of plan check and permit fees. A second class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "payment security," shall assure the payment of the cost of labor, equipment and materials supplied to construct the Improvements. A third class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as 'warranty security, shall serve as a guarantee and warranty of the Improvements for a period of one year following the completion and acceptance of the Improvements. Subdivider shall furnish performance and payment security prior to and as a condition of City Council approval of the Map. Subdivider shall provide warranty security after Improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council and prior to or concurrently with the final release of performance security. Warranty security shall not be required for Monumentation or Participatory Improvements. However, the City may utilize Monumentation Security for performance of or payment for the worts in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. As part of the obligation secured by each of the performance security, payment security and warranty security, and in addition to the face amount of each such security, each such security shall include and assure the payment of costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing the obligations thereby secured. B. Improvement security shall conform with Section 66499 of the California Government Code and one or more of the following: 1_ 7� 1) A cash deposit with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company, at City's option. 035 T: \PW D EPT\Devd iv\A gree ments\S IA\30357-Offsite .wpd 2) Surety bonds, of the form specified in subsection 66499.2 of the California Government Code, issued by a surety or sureties listed in the U.S. Department of Treasury Circular 570 (latest version). 3) Certificates of deposit, in City's name, from one or more financial institutions subject to regulation by the state or federal government and having a financial quality rating of "A" or better and a commitment reliability rating of "R-2" or better on the Investment Data Exchange (of the Los Angeles County Treasurer's office). 4) Irrevocable letters of credit, issued by one or more financial institutions meeting the requirements of Paragraph (3), pledging that the funds necessary to carry out the completion of the Improvements are on deposit, guaranteed for payment, and constitute a trust fund which is not subject to levy or attachment by any creditor of the depositor until released by City. Letters of credit shall guarantee that all or any portion of the funds available pursuant to the letters of credit will be paid upon the written demand of City and that such written demand need not present documentation of any type as a condition of payment, including proof of loss. The duration of any such letter of credit shall be for a period of not less than one year from the execution of the agreement with which it is provided and shall state, on its face, that the letter of credit will be automatically renewed until such time that City authorizes its expiration or until sixty (60) days after City receives notice from the financial institution of intent to allow expiration of the letter of credit. 5) A lien upon the subdivided property, if City finds that it would not be in the public interest to require the installation of the Improvements sooner than two (2) years after recordation of the final map or parcel map for which the Improvements are required. The lien shall provide a collateral value of three (3) times the estimated cost of the Improvements and shall include the power of sale of the real property, all buildings and improvements thereon, or that may be erected upon or made thereto, together with all hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in any wise appertaining, and the reservations, remainders, rents, issues, and profits thereof. The collateral value of the property shall be established at Subdivider's expense through an appraisal approved by City. 6) An instrument of credit from an agency of the state, federal or local government, when any agency of the state, federal, or local government provides at least Twenty Percent (20%) of the financing for the Improvements. 7) When Subdivider is a non-profit organization, security may be negotiable bonds, of the kind approved for securing deposits of public moneys with City or in favor of City, as specified in Section 16430 of the California Government Code, deposited, at City's option, with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company. C. All securities shall be furnished in accordance with the provisions of Exhibit A. The amount of the performance security shall equal One Hundred Percent (100%) of the estimated cost of constructing the Improvements, including payment of plan check and permit fees, as estimated by the City Engineer or a duly authorized representative of the City Engineer. The amount of Payment security shall equal the amount of the amount of performance security, except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A, and shall be furnished as a separate security. Warranty security shall equal Ten Percent (10%) of the amount of performance security except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A. D. At the time of submittal of security, Subdivider shall pay to City administrative fees applicable to the form of security provided. Administrative fees shall apply to the subdivision (final map, parcel map or waiver of parcel map) rather than to individual security instruments. The fees shall be paid separately for each different form and/or source (surety or financial institution) of security initially submitted and for substitution of securities but shall not be required for submittal of warranty security if the warranty security is of the same form and from the same source as the performance security it replaces. Administrative fees for security shall be as follows: 1) For certificates of deposit, bonds and letters of credit as described in Paragraphs 2), 3) and 4) of SECTION 3.B., which require the establishment of evidence of the reliability of the surety or financial institution, the administrative fee shall be One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00). 2) For liens on real property as described in Paragraph 5) of SECTION 3.B., for which City will prepare lien agreements and subordination agreements, administer valuation of the real property and administer F T:\PWDEPT\Devdiv\Agreements\SIA\30357-Offsite.wpd the agreements over the life of the lien, all of which require legal assistance and financial advice, Subdivider shall pay to City an administration fee of One Half of One Percent (0.5%) of the estimated cost of the improvements secured but not less than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) nor more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00). 3) For other forms of security listed in Section 3 B, above, there will be no administrative fee. E. Participatory Improvements, if any, are identified in Exhibit A. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place until the Participatory Improvements are constructed and actual costs are known and paid by Subdivider, or until Subdivider pays to City the estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements, and shall guarantee the reimbursement by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost of the Participatory Improvements. Payment security and warranty security shall not be required for Participatory Improvements. Upon written demand from City, Subdivider shall deposit cash with City in lieu of or in replacement of security guaranteeing Participatory Improvements. If Subdivider fails to deposit said cash within 30 days of the date of the written demand from City, City may present a written demand to Subdivider's Surety for payment of said cash and Subdivider's Surety shall pay to City the lesser of: 1) the amount demanded, or 2) the amount of the security. F. Security shall not expire, be reduced or become wholly or partially invalid for any reason, including non-payment of premiums, modifications of this Agreement and/or expiration of the time for performance stated in this Agreement, without express authorization from City unless the surety provides City with sixty (60) days written notice by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. G. Security shall be released in the following manner: 1) Performance security shall be released upon the final completion and acceptance or approval, by the City Council of the Improvements subject to the provisions of paragraph B. 2) The City Engineer may authorize partial reduction of performance security as work progresses, upon application by Subdivider. However, no such reduction shall be for an amount less than Ten Percent (10%) of the total performance security provided for the faithful performance of the act or work. In no event shall security be reduced below that required to guarantee the completion of the act or work or obligation secured, plus Ten Percent (10%). The City Engineer shall not allow more than two partial reductions of security furnished for any improvement agreement. 3) Participatory Improvement security shall be released upon payment by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost or estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements. 4) If City receives no notice of recorded claims of lien, labor and materials security shall be released in full 90 days after final acceptance and/or approval by the City Council, of the Improvements. If City receives notice of any recorded lien, the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act shall apply. 5) Warranty security not utilized during the warranty period shall be released one year after final acceptance or approval by the City Council of all Tract Improvements. However, if at the end of the one-year warranty period, there are one or more outstanding requests by City for performance of work or provision of materials under the terms of the warranty, warranty security shall be retained until the outstanding requests are satisfied or until Subdivider has made other arrangements satisfactory to the City Engineer. 4. Permits Required. Prior to commencing any phase of work, Subdivider shall obtain all permits required for that phase of work and pay all required fees. Work performed under a permit or permits shall comply with all provisions of the required permits. 5. Off -site Improvements. When the construction of one or more of the Improvements requires or necessitates the acquisition of real property not owned by Subdivider or City, Subdivider shall use its best efforts purchase such real property at a reasonable price. In the event that Subdivider is unsuccessful, despite its best efforts, to acquire such real property at a reasonable price, Subdivider may request in writing that City attempt 1 to acquire such real property. City may, but is not required to, agree to attempt to acquire such real property on behalf of Subdivider. If City so agrees, City and Subdivider shall enter a separate written agreement in a form 3 7 T: \PW D EPT\Devdiv\Agreements\SIA\30357-Offsite.wpd acceptable to the City Attorney. Said separate agreement shall provide that Subdivider advance to City One Hundred Fifty Percent (150%) of the appraised fair market value of the real property. Any unexpended portion of said advance shall be refunded to Subdivider. Any additional funds required for acquisition of the real property shall be paid by Subdivider to City upon the conveyance of said real property to Subdivider. In no event shall the failure of Subdivider or City to acquire such real property excuse, waive, or otherwise terminate Subdivider's obligation to construct the applicable improvement pursuant to this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval. 6. Completion of Improvements. Subdivider shall begin construction of the Improvements within ninety (90) days and shall complete construction within twelve (12) months after the approval of this Agreement. Portions of the Improvements may be completed at a later date, as determined by the City Engineer or as set forth in Exhibit A. Failure by Subdivider to begin or complete construction of the Improvements within the specified time periods shall constitute cause for City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare Subdivider in default of this agreement, to revise improvement security requirements as necessary to ensure completion of the improvements, and/or to require modifications in the standards or sequencing of the Improvements in response to changes in standards or conditions affecting or affected by the Improvements. Said failure shall not otherwise affect the validity of this agreement or Subdivider's obligations hereunder. 7. Force Majeure. In the event that Subdivider is unable to perform within the time limits herein due to strikes, act of God, or other events beyond Subdivider's control, the time limits for obligations affected by such events will be extended by the period of such events. 8. Time Extension. Subdivider may make application in writing to the City Council for an extension of time for completion of the Improvements. The City Council, in its sole and absolute discretion, may approve or deny the request or conditionally approve the extension with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. As a condition of the time extension, Subdivider shall furnish securities, similar in form and substance to those required in SECTION 3 hereinabove, to cover the period of extension. The value of the securities shall be sufficient to ensure the performance of and payment for Improvements that remain incomplete at the time of the extension, and to provide warranty security on completed Improvements. 9. Survey Monuments. Before final approval of street improvements, Subdivider shall place survey monuments in accordance with the provisions of Sections 66495, et sec. of the Subdivision Map Act and of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Subdivider shall provide the City Engineer written proof that the monuments have been set, evidence of payment and receipt thereof by the engineer or surveyor setting the monuments, and intersection monument tie -outs for monuments set in public streets. 10. Final Acceptance of Improvements. At the completion of construction and prior to acceptance of the Improvements by City, Subdivider shall submit a request for final approval by City. The request shall be accompanied by any required certifications from Subdivider's engineers or surveyors, approval letters from other agencies having jurisdiction over and approval authority for improvements required by this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval, and any required construction quality documentation not previously submitted. Upon receipt of said request, the City Engineer or a duly -authorized representative will review the required documentation and will inspect the Improvements. If the Improvements are determined to be in accordance with applicable City standards and specifications, and as provided herein, obligations required by the Conditions of Approval and this Agreement have been satisfied, and Subdivider has provided revised plans as required in Paragraph 11, hereinafter, the City Engineer shall recommend acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council. 11. Revisions to Plans. When the Improvements have been inspected and approved by the City Engineer, Subdivider shall make any necessary revisions to the original plans held by City so the plans depict the actual Improvements constructed. When necessary revisions have been made, each separate sheet of the plans shall be clearly marked with the words "As -Built," "As -Constructed," or "Record Drawing," the marking shall be stamped by an engineer or surveyor, as appropriate for the improvements thereon, who is licensed to practice in California, and the plans shall be resubmitted to the City Engineer. 038 T:\PWDEP nDevdiv\Agreements\SIA\30357-Offsite.wpd 12. Improvement Warranty. Subdivider hereby guarantees the Improvements to City for a period of one (1) year, beginning on the date of final acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council, against any defective work or labor done, or defective materials furnished, and shall repair or replace such defective work or materials. 13. Release of Security. City shall retain and release securities in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of this agreement. Prior to the release of payment security, the City Engineer may require Subdivider to provide a title report or other evidence sufficient to show claims of lien, if any, that may affect the amount of payment security released. 14. Citx Right to Cure. If Subdivider fails to perform any obligation hereunder and such obligation has not been performed within sixty (60) days after written notice of default from City, then City may perform the obligation, and Subdivider shall pay the entire cost of such performance by City including costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing such obligation. In cases of emergency or compelling public interest, as determined by the City Engineer, the requirement for written notice of default and/or the passage of sixty (60) days shall be deemed waived and all other provisions of this Article shall remain in effect. 15. Indemnification. Subdivider hereby binds itself, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, executors, administrators, guarantors, heirs, and assigns, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold City and its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and assigns harmless from and against any losses, claims, demands, actions, or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, arising out of or in any way connected with Subdivider's performance herein under, including costs of suit and reasonable attorneys' fees. 16. No Modification of Conditions. This Agreement shall in no respect act to modify or amend any provision of the Conditions of Approval. In the event that any requirement or condition of this Agreement is inconsistent with or fails to include one or more provisions of the Conditions of Approval, which document(s) is (are) incorporated herein by reference, the provisions in the Conditions of Approval shall remain in effect and shall control. 17. Severability. In the event that any provision or provisions of this Agreement are held unenforceable, all provisions not so held shall remain in full force and effect. 18. General Provisions A. All notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the parties at their respective addresses indicated hereon. Notices personally delivered shall be effective upon delivery. Notices mailed as provided herein and sent postage prepaid shall be effective upon the date of delivery or refusal indicated on the return receipt. Either party may change its address for notices hereunder by notice to the other given in the manner provided in this subparagraph. B. The terms, conditions, covenants, and agreements set forth herein shall apply to and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors of the parties hereto. C. Neither party to this Agreement relies upon any warranty or representation not contained in this Agreement. D. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted with respect to the laws of the State of California. E. In the event of any dispute between the parties with respect to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to prompt payment of its reasonable attorneys' fees from the non -prevailing party. F. Any failure or delay by either party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any such rights or remedies provided for hereunder. 197 039 T:\PWD EPT\Devdiv\Agreements\SIA\30357-Offsite.wpd IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. CITY: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 760/777-7075 Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Date ATTEST: City Clerk SUBDIVIDER: TOLL BROTHERS INC. Regional Manager Mr. Gary Lemon 74-923 Hovley Lane #2-220 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Tel. No. (760) 674-9389 By: Date Title: By: Date Title: Reviewed and Approved: / lSZ Cit ngin er Date Approved as to Form: City Attorney Date t2 (140 T: \P W D EPT\Devd iv\A greements\S IA\30357-Offsite mpd Exhibit A SECURITY - TRACT MAP 30357 OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS Except as otherwise provided herein, Subdivider shall furnish performance security and labor & materials security prior to agendization of the Map for approval by the City Council. Improvements designated as "Participatory" have been or will be constructed by others. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place indefinitely until called upon or released by City. The "Engineering & Plans" security will be released when the City has possession of complete, approved, original plans, signed and sealed by a design professional(s), for all required improvements. The "No -Plan Contingency", which may be utilized for any listed item or for other cost found necessary in the design or construction of the required improvements, may be released in whole or part by the City Engineer, at any time after construction plans are complete and the scope and nature of improvements are fully known. These releases shall be separate from and in addition to the reductions discussed below. As elements of the work are completed, Subdivider may request a maximum of two partial releases of performance security. Partial releases shall be for not less than ten percent (10%) of the total performance security for the tract and shall not reduce total performance security below the amount necessary to complete the Improvements plus ten percent (10%) of the original amount. Partial releases of performance security will be evaluated and may be granted, in whole or in part, by the City Engineer. Requests for partial releases, setting forth in detail the amount of work completed and the value thereof, shall be made in writing to the City Engineer. Labor & materials security shall remain in place until 90 days after all required tract improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council. Improvement Description Performance Labor & Materials Off Site Improvements Avenue 50 Improvements $256,850 $256,850 Avenue 52 Improvements $114,432 $114,432 Avenue 52 Sewer Improvements $927,800 $927,800 Sub -Total$ $1,299,082 $1,299,082 Traffic Signals Jefferson Street at Pomelo (50%) $74,000 $74,000 Avenue 50 at Verano Dr. (100%) $130,000 $130,000 Sub -Total $204,000 $204,000 Perimeter Landscape and Wall Improvements For Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 $641,436 $641,436 Irrigation Relocations $103,365 $103,365 Construction Subtotal: $2,247,883 $2,247,883 Professional Fees Design & Construction (15%) $337,182 Subtotal: $2,585,065 Contingency (20% of project) $517,013 TOTAL: $3,102,078 $2,247,883 1?9 o4t Tjti�t 4 4Qu&fw AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: July 16, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Adoption of a Resolution Supporting Measure A PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council supporting Measure A. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Passage of Measure A, in November 2002, will raise over $4.6 billion for needed transportation projects, programs and improvements throughout Riverside County. Of the $4.6 billion, revenue allocations for the Coachella Valley are expected to total over $1.2 billion. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: On July 9, 2002, staff was contacted by "Yes on A," a privately -funded campaign, with a request for the City of La Quinta to take a support position on Measure A. Initially passed by the voters in 1988, Measure A is a Countywide ballot initiative that provides for a half -cent sales tax, which is used for transportation improvements and programs throughout Riverside County. Although Measure A is not scheduled to expire until 2008, proponents are urging voters to approve its extension in November 2002, maintaining it will give the County the ability to move forward with improvements before population growth creates Countywide gridlock. The Measure A extension is anticipated to raise $4,662,000,000 (between 2009 and 2039), with $1,255,000,000 expected to be allocated to the Coachella Valley. If extended, some of the benefits Measure A will provide, particularly for the Coachella Valley and the City of La Quinta, include (more background information on Measure A and its benefits is provided as Attachment 1): Improved traffic flow and reduced congestion on Highway 111 • Added/improved interchanges on Highway 86/Interstate 10 -1 3 0 Improved safety and visibility at major intersections and arterial roadways Improved major roadways identified by local governments as priorities Continued support for maintaining and improving public transit Major supporters and/or originators of Measure A include: the County of Riverside, the Riverside County Transportation Commission, the Western Riverside Council of Governments, and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments. Additionally, Measure A received strong support from the Coachella Valley Chambers of Commerce. Supporting Chambers include Cathedral City, Desert Hot Springs, Indio, La Quinta, Palm Desert, Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage. Staff was informed that a request for support of Measure A is being forwarded to all Riverside County cities. The City of La Quinta will be one of the first cities to have the item on its agenda, with other Valley cities considering the item during the same week. The attached Resolution has been prepared for Council's consideration of this request. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council supporting Measure A; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council supporting Measure A; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager l3T Attachment: 1. Background Information on Measure A 002 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE PASSAGE OF MEASURE A ON THE NOVEMBER 2002 BALLOT WHEREAS, since 1989, Measure A has supplied Riverside County with the funding to provide its residents with safer roads, more reliable public transit and traffic relief; and WHEREAS, Riverside County is the fastest growing large county in California and is anticipated to grow to a population of more than three million people by the year 2020; and WHEREAS, over sixty percent of transportation funding throughout Riverside County and its cities is provided by Measure A; and WHEREAS, extending Measure A will raise over $4.6 billion for much needed transportation projects, programs and improvements; and WHEREAS, Measure A will provide major improvements to every interstate and highway in the county; and WHEREAS, Measure A will expand public transit programs and options for commuters, seniors and disabled residents; and WHEREAS, Measure A will provide the crucial funding needed for cities such as La Quinta to maintain and improve local streets and roads; and WHEREAS, if Measure A is not extended, the transportation network within Riverside County will be seriously crippled, adversely affecting commuters and residents throughout the county; and WHEREAS, by passing Measure A on the November 2002 ballot, Riverside County will ensure a stable source of funding to relieve traffic congestion, increase public transit programs, build new highways and improve local streets; and WHEREAS, passing Measure A will ensure that the City of La Quinta is able to provide a safer environment to its residents and maintain a high quality of life. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1302 003 Resolution No. 2002- (enter project name) Adopted: (enter meeting date) Page The City Council hereby supports the passage of Measure A on the November 2002 ballot. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16th day of July, 2002, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Council Members NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON , City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 133 004 JUL-09-2002 TUE 02:59 PM FAX N0, Glem,erAir. LMAnafnccoftaesuam What is Measure A? ATTACHMENT 1 Measure A is a countywide ballot initiative that would extend a half -cent sales tax used for transportation improvements and programs. Why do we need to extend Measure A? Riverside County is the fastest growing county of its size in California. Population in Riverside County has increased 150% in the last twenty years and will likely reach 3 million residents by 2020. The County needs a more extensive transportation network to support this population. it is estimated that residents commuting to jobs outside our county can expect travel times of up to six hours a day on some freeways if improvements are not made and alternative routes not established) Why do we have to pass an extension now if the first Measure A doesn't expire until 2008? Transportation projects take time to plan and guide through the process of environmental checks and construction. But more importantly, early passage of the extension will give the County the ability to move forward with improvements now — before population growth creates countywide gridlock. How will Measure A provide traffic relief to Riverside County? The Measure A extension is estimated to raise over $4.6 billion for transportation projects countywide. This will include major improvements to every state highway and interstate in the county, the establishment of a regional arterial roadway system, as well as expanding public transit for all residents and maintaining and improving our local streets and roads. 134 Paid,for by Riverside County 7arpayers for Trgo7c Relief - ID# 1244131 - 3403 Trmh Street, Suite 110 - Riverside., CA 92501 006 07-09-02 14:59 RECEIVED FROM: JUL-09-2002 TUE 03!00 PM FAX NO. P. 04 How will Measure A benefit the City of La Ouinta? Some of the programs aimed at providing traffic relief to the Coachella Valley: Regional Imrovement Proiects • Improve traffic flow and reduce congestion on Highway 111 • Add/improve interchanges on Highway 86 and Interstate 10 Improve safety and visibility at major intersections and arterial roadways Improve major roadways identified by local governments as priorities Public Transit • Provide Express East-West transit routes to Coachella Valley • Guarantee continued discounted Sunline Transit Agency fares for senior and disabled residents • Continue to fund and support SunBus, SunLink, VetsExpress and SunRide services for Coachella Valley residents • Enable Sunline to replace aging buses with new vehicles for its fleet Measure A Revenue Allocations ($ millions) Western County Area Highway Improvements $1,020 New Corridors $ 370 Public Transit/ Commuter Services $ 390 Regional Arterial Projects $ 300 Local Streets & Road Improvements $ 970 Bond Financing $ 270 Economic Development 40 TOTAL $3,360 Coachella Valley Highways and Regional Arterials $ 628 Local Streets and Roads $ 439 Specialized and Public Transit $ 188 TOTAL $1,255 Palo Verde Valley Area Local Streets and Road Improvements 47 TOTAL $ 47 TOTAL EXPENDITURE PLAN $4,662 Paid for by Riverside Counry Taxpayers fnr Trqffic Relief - 1D# 1244131 • 3403 Tenth Street, Suite .110 - Riverside, CA 92.501 1 -, or- 0 O 07-09-02 15:00 RECEIVED FROM: JUL-09-2002 TUE 03:01 PM FA}, NO. P. 05 Alaert 6un July 5"', 2002 Our Voice: Sales tax essential to transit services Measure A is viable solution to transportation woes With 272,000 more people expected to call the valley home in the next 20 years, the already -congested roads are only going to get more bottlenecked, threatening residents' quality of life. Measure A, slated for the countywide ballot in November, has the capacity to help alleviate some of the ill effects of growth. It has already been a great benefactor to the valley, providing funds to expand Highway 111 and the Mid -Valley Parkway. One of the most compelling reasons -- and there are many -- to support the one-half cent transportation sales -tax measure is that, if approved, it will provide hundreds of millions of dollars more for much -needed road and street improvements, making it easier to navigate the ever-growing valley. The need for Measure A is especially critical in light of a traffic study released earlier this year in which California rated as "poor" 37 percent of its 168,000 miles of road. That's a higher percentage than any other state, and it's no wonder. An analysis of 2000 information from the Federal Highway Administration found that California spent $82 per resident on maintenance -- less than any other state. It is time to reverse the decades -long trend of under funding road maintenance to better accommodate the explosion of motorists in the state — and valley. In addition, Measure A also will provide $188 million to the valley for sorely needed public transit between 2009 and 2039. Though use of public transportation has nearly doubled in Riverside County since 1990, services are still inadequate or unavailable for those who need them most. Residents without access to transportation are hobbled in their efforts to gain employment, to educate themselves and to seek vital medical care among other things. Opponents argue we don't need another new tax. Measure A is not a new tax; it's an extension of an existing tax. Opponents also argue that politicians are reneging on their promise to sunset the tax in W- 09 We don't see it that way. No one could have predicted the growth -- and subsequent congestion -- the valley has experienced in recent years. We don't see this as breaking a promise; we see it as protecting residents' quality of life. In 2000, Measure A, approved in 1988, paid for about $12 million in local road expansions and improvements; in 2001, it paid for just shy of $13 million in similar improvements. . It's a half -cent consumers hardly notice paying, but it goes a long way toward keeping traffic in the valley moving in an orderly fashion and the roads and highways in decent shape. By the end of its first life in 2009, Measure A will have raised an estimated $1 billion for roads and alternate energy programs and has helped fund a number of local projects, including the Mid -Valley Parkway and the expansion of Highway 111. 1 3 6 Measure A could pave the way to gainful employment or a diploma, It's a tax difficult to reject. 07-09-02 15:01 RECEIVED FROM: JUL-09-2002 TUE 03:01 PM FAX NO. P. 06 � ti �- w► i D ,r ti e CHAMBEp, of COMMERCE wiz M....W'aYbrnp polm Spring, ChwnDet ofCoanmroe NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: October 18, 2001 Contact: Susie Harvey Phone: 346-6111 CHAMBER COALITION SUPPORTS MEASURE A The Coachella Valley Chambers of Commerce strongly support and endorse efforts by our local representatives to extend the term of Measure A. Supporting Chambers include Cathedral City, Desert Hot Springs, Indio, La Quinta, Palm Desert, Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage. Measure A. the % cent portion of the current Sales Tax, funds a major portion of the local transportation projects - Approximately twenty-four percent of the funds generated in Riverside County return to the Coachella Valley. Basic roads and streets, highway interchanges, railway crossings and the Sunline System are all beneficiaries of these funds. Measure A is scheduled to expire in eight y®ars. As our population increases, without an extension, projects MORE MORE 137 07-09-02 15:01 RECEIVED FROM: nnq JUL-09-2002 TUE 03:02 PM FAX NO. P. 07 CHAMBER COALITiON SUPPORTS MEASURE E age 2 proposed by the Riverside Transportation COMMission, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments, CalTrans and other local and county agencies will be in jeopardy, leaving the Coachella Valley unprepared for the twenty-first century. Therefore, the Ail Valley Legislative Committee, a coalition of seven local chambers of commerce representing over 5,000 businesses, unanimously supports the extension of Measure A. 138 oto 07-09-02 15:02 RECEIVED FROM: JUL-09-2002 TUE 03:02 PM FAX NO. P. 00 w � O [d to co G aC O O r r 4 m (hr—T0 �• 7TY�r�1 rd 2 �0I m•�ms a �a�. 3 aim 3 iz m 3 o C�7 i I mD � � m mom �m 3 3� In ❑°,� maw a��6 U b Q m• u ° �(Ti _ i m a i n V + -tn VA VA 00O �jn ,<w0j Crp�c _0 j So- E401 m n J 0 2 A U] om 0 ft i 139 07-09-02 15:02 RECEIVED FROM: Oil Til4t 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: / COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 16, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: Consideration of a Resolution Approving the Fiscal Year 2002-2003 City of La Quinta Budget and Establishing the City's Appropriation Limit RECOMMENDATION: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving the Fiscal Year 2002-2003 City of La Quinta Budget and establishing the City's Appropriation Limit; and receive and file the Five Year Resource Allocation Plan. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: All Fiscal Year 2002-2003 revenues, operational appropriations and capital project funding are included in the Proposed Fiscal Year 2002-2003 Budget. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the City Council Meeting of June 20, 2002, the City Council adopted the Preliminary Budget and provided staff direction regarding the Final Budget for the 2002-2003 Fiscal Year. A summary of those changes is provided as Attachment 1. Additionally, staff has provided a list of continuing appropriations/encumbrances for Fiscal Year 2002/2003, as well as a copy of the June 20, 2002 staff report for reference (Attachments 2 & 3). As indicated in the City Manager's Budget Message, staff believes that this year's budget is a continuation of the City Council's commitment to enhancing the quality of life for La Quinta residents. Numerous businesses have chosen to locate in La Quinta including several quality restaurants, financial institutions and other businesses. As a result staff has increased the budget estimates for sales taxes by 18%. Upcoming projects include construction of Phase 1 of the Municipal Library design, the La Quinta Community Park, the La Quinta Museum expansion, Phase II of Jefferson Street (widening of Jefferson Street between Highway 111 and Indio Boulevard) and design of the City's first municipal golf course. 140 Also provided for the City Council review is the City's annual Five -Year Resource Allocation Plan ( Attachment 4). City staff requests that this item be received and filed. Respectfully submitted, John M. Falconet, Finance Director Approved for Submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachmentsl : Changes between Preliminary vs. Final Budget Accounts 2: Appropriations/Encumbrances 3: June 20, 2002 Staff Report 4: City's Five -Year Resource Allocation Plan 5: City of La Quinta Fiscal Year 2002-2003 Annual Budget and Supporting Document (under separate cover) l41 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 AND APPROVING A BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 WHEREAS, each year the La Quinta City Council adopts a Budget for Revenues and Expenditures for the upcoming Fiscal Year; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to make provisions for a level of services commensurate with the needs of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said budget and has had several public meetings to receive public input; and WHEREAS, the City Council has, after due deliberation and consideration, made such amendments in the proposed budget as it considers desirable; and WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the government Code of the State of California provides that each year the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall, by resolution, establish its appropriations limit for the following fiscal year; and WHEREAS, Section 7902(b) of the Government Code sets forth the method for determining the said appropriations limit, to be based upon the limit applicable for the prior fiscal year and adjusted for changes in the cost -of -living and in population. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of La Quinta to adopt, as follows: SECTION 1. The appropriations limit for the City of La Quinta established in accordance with Section 7902(b) of the California Government Code, for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 is $48,020,286. SECTION 2. It is hereby found and determined that in compliance with Government Code Section 7910, the documentation used in the determination of said appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 was available to the public in the Finance Department of the City and in the Office of the City Clerk at least fifteen days prior to this date. SECTION 3. The Fiscal Year 2002-2003 Budget which is on file with the City Clerk, is hereby approved. SECTION 4. The Redevelopment Agency agrees to the reimbursement to the City for services performed by the City on behalf of the Agency. Such reimbursement, as computed and included in the budget document, shall include salary, salary related costs, direct costs, and indirect overhead costs. SECTION 5. Continuing Appropriations which remain unspent and were authorized by Council in Fiscal Year 2001 /02 are approved in the Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Budget in an amount not to exceed $1,264,722. SECTION 6. Encumbrances for Fiscal Year 2001-02 for committed appropriations are approved in the Fiscal Year 2002-2003 Budget in an amount not to exceed $67,270. SECTION 7. Budget adjustment procedures are approved as follows: A. Additional appropriations and the transfer of cash or unappropriated fund balance from one fund to another shall be made only upon City Council approval. B. Transfers of budgeted appropriations between divisions or capital projects shall be made only upon City Council approval. C. Transfers of budgeted appropriations between accounts within a division or capital project may be made with the approval of the City Manager or his designee. D. Prior year budget continuing Appropriations and Encumbrances for unexpended capital project appropriations remaining from uncompleted prior year capital projects shall be made with City Manager approval. These carry-over appropriations are for prior year Council approved capital projects and shall not exceed the approved project budget. SECTION 8. The City Manager shall render a monthly report to the City Council on the status of City operations as it relates to the approved budget and any amendments thereto. 14? UU PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of July, 2002 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: KATHY JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 1441 ATTACHMENT 1 City of La Quinta Changes Between Preliminary vs. Final Budget Accounts FY 2002/03 General Fund Preliminary Budget - Reserve Bob Hope Chrysler Classic Police Special Contingency Special Project Contingency Community Special Events LQ Arts Foundation Preliminary Budget Changes Final Budget 8,114 (3,200) 4,914 0 25,000 25,000 92,500 25,000 117,500 55,000 (35,000) 20,000 61,800 (21, 800) 40,000 90,000 10,000 100,000 145 ATTACHMENT 2 m gm N a a n n mho cO1 to w vOOie'o qao eee �� nn mi I 16 - �n �6^ H UJo cn Mt fM cmi?N 8.2 _ I v , n ..- o�wmA St m2A✓m_� u v9 _ H wz v omw v Vo'.a�� qa a o_'Eo,,�LLE oV c �rn�aL 3n5 _ `vmc'sue gw oY€ �E a �NT 3K�a° o .. N _ccvu pu`.�UoqU�O¢ado a v8'q ¢ o c c T y o g W c o v o o c r V U m L a Mr c ui O N€ rn c fJ (J is ig c mU NO ME U u tCLLF U .h J, �oi J, eS J�doNo.A fi fi ci J, dNdd rho A .A .A J, J, h .A JoN,m000�n o�mN of H fi .A c � o `,:.5� �NNr. cv lvry �+c50000000'h rri ri .i `i��r+� a _-_.-.--__-_.-.- �� .�, �, YY?YYYYYaO1 O1 O1m Wo, a,rn .-.-��_��n�Nvvvvv V?YYYY4Y� .-------�,., I E tYY o 14G ATTACHMENT 3 T4&t 4 lwQutHrw AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: / COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: June 20, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: Consideration of Fiscal Year PUBLIC HEARING: 2002/2003 Preliminary Budget RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Preliminary Budget and direct staff to prepare a Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Final Budget for the July 16, 2002, City Council Meeting. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: All Prelirninary Fiscal Year 2002/2003 revenues, operational appropriations and capital projects funding are included in this Preliminary Budget. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: INTRODUCTION This preliminary Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Budget is similar to the format implemented the last few years. This format utilizes two separate documents to develop the City, Agency and Financing Authority's Budget. The first of the two documents utilized for presentation of this year's budget is titled Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Preliminary Budget and includes the total scope of operations for the City, Agency and Financing Authority. The second document is titled the Supporting Document. This document provides the detail for each program operation and the justification for any of the changes requested. SUMMARY OF THIS YEAR'S BUDGET: REVENUES This year's budget reflects an increase in a number of revenue sources totaling $847,000. The Fiscal Year 2002/2003 revenues are projected with the major changes reflected in the following tables: 14 . 6�L9 INCREASE REVENUE TYPE (DECREASE) Property Tax $269,100 Sales Tax 582,000 Transient Occupancy Tax (85,000) Motor Vehicle in Lieu 168,600 County Fire Tax 100,000 Interest (176, 500) Miscellaneous (11,700) S 847.000 EXPENDITURES This year's budget has also received close scrutiny of all planned expenditures. The effects of Proposition 218 have resulted in the need to utilize the General Fund for operating expenditures previously paid by the Lighting and Landscaping District. The Public Works Lighting and Landscape Maintenance costs exceeded reimbursements by $765,000. As identified on page C-2 of the Preliminary Budget, this year's budget is balanced and contains a $8,114 surplus. Some of the significant items or changes contained in the Preliminary Budget are as follows: Department Description Amount Chance General Government Legal Costs $477,000 $80,000 City Clerk Elections 35,800 35,800 Finance Information Technology Charges 77,250 77,250 Finance Citywide Integrated Activities Software 225,000 225,000 Finance Budget Newsletter 10,000 10,000 Police Patrol (Salaries) 2,503,943 105,000 Police Motor Officer Full Year Funding 150,384 106,700 Police Gang Task Force Position Full Year Funding 148,928 117,500 Police Grant funded special activities 189,110 140,000 Building Fire Services Contract 1,698,000 1,698,000 Public Works Update Drainage Plan - Phase 1 75,000 75,000 Public Works Contract Traffic Engineer 41,600 41,600 Public Works Update Pavement Management Plan 60,000 60,000 Public Works Citywide Landscape Maintenance Contract 700,000 100,000 Public Works Landscape Lighting Maintenance Contract 160,000 44,000 Public Works Landscape Utilities 354,100 66,000 All Departments Salary and Benefits 5,746,300 825,000 All Departments Miscellaneous 3,922 $3,810,722 148 610 OTHER FUNDS The following lists other significant line items contained in the budget. Fund Description Amount Information Technology Accounting Software $225,000 Additionally, the following additions were requested by Departments for improving City services and were not included in the preliminary budget. Department Position/Description Amount Public Works Back Hoe $80,000 Public Works Drainage Study - Phase 2 50,000 Public Works Office Assistant 46,600 Police Priority Priority 1 - Community Action Team 426,045 Police Priority 2 - Increase Patrol Hours 427,708 From 82 to 92 PFRSOIUNFI There are no proposed additions or deletions to the 76 full time equivalent positions currently funded at the City. The proposed budget includes normal step increases for eligible employees and a 3.1 % Cost of Living Allowance. COMMUNITY SERVICE PROJECTS In past budgets, the Council has included community service projects to benefit the citizens, children, and business community in the City of La Quinta (Attachment 1). The following table lists Community Service items exceeding $5,000: AGENCIES BUDGETED C.V. Recreation & Park District - Pool Hours $20,000 Bob Hope Chrysler Classic ( Attachment 2) 50,000 Boys & Girls Club Facility Use 30,000 Community Special Events (formerly Village Faire) 61,800 Boys & Girls Club - Floor Refinishing 6,000 Sports Complex - Shade Structure 25,000 Sports Complex - Brick Dust 6,000 Special Projects 55,000 La Quinta Arts Foundation 90,000 AB 939 Unallocated Requests 10,000 La Quinta Chamber of Commerce ( Attachment 3) 125,000 Date Festival 5,250 C.V. Economic Partnership 6,000 $490,050 14 9 . 011 TIMELINE Attached is a brief outline of the City staff presentation of the Preliminary Budget (Attachment 4) as well as a one -page summary of highlights of this year's budget (Attachment 5). Staff is requesting that at the June 20, 2002, City Council meeting, the Council review and make any amendments as necessary to the Preliminary Budget. Subsequent to this review, staff is requesting approval of the Preliminary Budget with a July 1, 2002, effective date. Staff will then incorporate all changes pursuant to the discussion of the Preliminary Budget and schedule the item for consideration at the July 16, 2002, City Council meeting for Final Budget adoption. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The FY 2002/03 Preliminary Budget incorporates the planned capital expenditures for next year. The projects can be found on Pages H-1 and H-2 and include funding for five (5) major CIP projects - Phase 2 of Jefferson St Widening between 1-10 and Hwy 1 1 1, The Ranch property development, Museum expansion, Phase 1 Library construction and Fire Station construction. FIVE YEAR RESOURCE ALLOCATION PLAN City staff is currently completing the Five Year Resource Allocation Plan (RAP). This five-year plan forecasts the operating expenditures and the anticipated revenues to pay for these expenditures. Staff will incorporate any changes between the Preliminary Budget and the final budget into the Five Year Resource Allocation Plan which is scheduled for presentation at the July 16, 2002, City Council meeting. SUMMARY This memorandum is intended only as a summary of the issues and details of the budget. We look forward to these discussions with the City Council at the June 20, 2002 City Council meeting. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: City staff is requesting: 1) Review and comment on the 2002/2003 Fiscal Year Budget and provide direction regarding any proposed changes to the document. 150 2) Approval of the 2002/2003 Preliminary Budget as amended at the June 20, 2002, City Council Meeting. (Any approved changes by the City Council to be incorporated into the Final Budget for adoption on July 16, 2002.) spectftgy submitted, Johh M. Falconer; Fin6nce Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. School/Grant/Contract Contributions/Department Requests 2. Bob Hope Chrysler Classic Request 3. Chamber of Commerce Request 4. Staff Outline 5. Major Highlights 6. Preliminary Budget 1.51 'L,3 City of La Quints School/Grant/Contract Contributions/Dept Requests FY 01/02 Actual and FY (' -103 Budgeted Through 37,417 Cat o Budgeted FY 01/02 Actual FY 01/02 Expenditures I I�� Committed I I Total Budgeted Actual & I I FY 02/03 Committed Grants Soap Box Derby (Franchise fees) I 1,600 1,500 1,500 1,600 Bob Hope Chrysler Classic - (Note 1) 0 25,000 ( 25.000 0 Soap Box Derby (Traffic Control) I 2.800 1,612 1,612 2.800 CV Economic Partnership 5,000 5,000 5,000 6,000 CVRPD - Octoberfest CVRPD - Pool hours - (Note 2) Holiday in the Park 2,200 3,000 3,000 2,205 500 I I 2,205 I 2,200 0 3,00 3,000Date Festival 5 000 5000 I 5,250 SI 23.850 Subtotal 22 600 1 40817 0 A/C 101-251-663-000 I iContingency LO Arts Association 4,000 4,000 'Vets Express i 2,000 2,000 Riverside County Sherriff Pistol Team 1,500 1,500 Lions Club 1,000 1,000 ! ISoroptimists Club (rent) 4,070 ,0 t LQ HS Cheerleaders 2,500 ! 0 22,5500 LQ HS Junior ROTC 2,000 2 000 CARE Program 2 qgg 2 499 Veterans of Foreign Wars (rent) 1,125 1,125 ! Living Desert 1,000 1,000 LQ HS Band Boosters 2,499 2,499 United Cerebral Palsy 1,250 1,250 Community Blood Bank 1,000 1,000 LQ Desert Wildcats 2,499 2,499 HS Football 2,499 2,499 YMCA of the Desert 5.810 5,810 �1-0 CV Park & Rec Building Permits 14,000 14,000 YMCA of the Desert - Permits 2,500 2,500 ;Meals on Wheels I 525 525 i F 54.276 ! 55,000 Subtotal 56.200 1 37.776 16 500 1 Contracts 'Chamber of Commerce (Boys & Girls Club - Facility Use 125,000 30,000 125,000 30,000 I 125,000 30,000 1 125,000 1 30,000 (Boys & Girls Club - Floor Repair !LQ 6,000 0 6,000 L6.000 6,000 6,000 Arts Foundation 75,000 75,000 230,000 75.000 236,000 75,000 Subtotal 236,000 236,000 A8939 Requests i Unallocated 10.000 10,000 10,000 10.000 00 L1, O c I 10,000 Subtotal 0 10,000 Department Requests I Office Assistant - Public Works 0 0 0 (Back hoe !Phase 2 - Update Flood Plan Community Action Team - Police Priority 1 (Additional Patrol Hours - Police Priori 2 0 0 0 0 ! C 0 0 75,000 0 0 0 _� 0 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 75,000 Requests FY 02103 i ! 50.000 I I I 50�000 125,000 30,000 46,629 80.000 125.000 426,045 427.708 !Total 324,@00 31�8 593 22 500 341,093� 399 850 1 365 3@2 During FY 01/02 the City Council appropriated $25,000 from the Police Services Special Projects Account to fund Bob Hope Chrysler Classic - (Note 1) this request. CVRPD - Pool hours - (Note 2) Program not offered last fiscal year OFFICERS: BOB HOPE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD STEVE MORTON PRESIDENT AND TOLRNAMENT CHAIRMAN JOHN M. FOSTER FIRST VICE PRESIDENT AND ASST. TOLRNAMENT CHMN ROBERT P. BRENNAN TREASLRER ERNIE DUNLEVIE SECRETARI DONALD B. POOLEV ASST. SECRF.TARI/TREASL'RER DIRE( *1OWN: ROBERT P. BRENNAN JOHN CURCI TONY DEL GIORGIO DA\ DUNLAP ERNIE DUNLE\'IF JOHN EGER JOHN E EVENSO\ JOHN M FOSTER ROBERTJ. FRAIMAN JERRNCORER )OH\ LANE VICTOR L.BUE. W STEVE MORTO\ DAVID PEAT DO\ALDR Mxxn, N ILLI %%I T POK ERS BRAD QUAYLE JAMES R. REED WILLIAM G. SALATIC14 EUGENE WEISBERG 1(Jl It\ \\II:\'r UlltI.-(loll MICHAEL MILTHORPE \U\II\I\ I It.\TIN E DIRlfil OR DAWN SUGGS BOB HOPE CHRYSLER CLASSIC Post Office Box 865. Rancho Mirage, California 92270 Bob Hope Classic Building, 39000 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage. Calil'Omij 92270 (760) 346-8184 - I-888-MR B HOPE - FAX (760) 3.36-6329 Web Site: www.bhcc.com - E-Mail Info@ bhec.com - bhecadmin@top2host.com May 2, 2002 The Hon. John Pena MAY 6 A' Mayor of the City of LaQuinta °'�Z Post Office Box 1504 LaQuinta, CA 92253 Dear John: As you may recall, we appeared before the City Council last December to request the sum of $50,000 to defray certain city and county mandated costs. The Council agreed to reimburse the Classic for $25,000 of these costs, for which the Board was very grateful. You will note from the enclosed schedule that our costs for land preparation, soil stabilization, and sworn security greatly exceeded the $25,000 granted by the city by nearly $50,000. We are currently working on the budget for 2003. Given continued heightened security requirements, on -going land prep costs, and the event being played at two courses with the city of LaQuinta (PGA West as host and LaQuinta Country Club), we expect our costs to be similar or higher in '03. We seek your advice on how best to appreach the City Council to increase their funding to $50,000. I will look forward to hearing from you. As always, the Board and staff deeply appreciate the City's cooperation andssupport of our desert charity fund raising event. Sincerely, Michael Milthorpe Tournament Director Enclosure cc: John Foster, President and Tournament Chairman 15 G16 June 10, 2002 To: Tom Genovese, City Manager Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager From: Dr. Kurt Spurgin, President Re: 2002-2003 City -Chamber Contract for Services Proposal We are pleased to submit the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce contract for services proposal for the period July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003. We propose to continue with the current Scope of Services to include: A. Business Retention and Promotion B. The `Gem" Newspaper C. The Visitors Center A. Business Retention and Promotion: The growth of La Quinta has had a positive impact on the rising number of our membership base. The Chamber has positioned itself for membership retention and growth by clearly defining and constantly improving the value of membership benefits and services provided. By the end of this fiscal year, we anticipate a record high increase in membership of over 140 new members. Our Membership Services Committee has recommended continuing with the same dues structure as last year. We did increase our dues last year, however, valley -wide we will still remain the most economic Chamber to join. Our focus on membership retention has resulted in important staff adjustments to continue a high level of service to our members. The Chamber Bi-Monthly City/Chamber Meetings and the Chamber Executive Director's involvement in the quarterly city marketing meetings have aided the chamber to work in conjunction with the city on business retention and promotion,. We support continuation of these two effective means of communication. The contract for service dollar amount for Business Retention and Promotion will remain constant. La Quinta Chamber or Commerce 154 78 -1 Highway 111 Lei Quinta, CA 92253 Phone:-6o-564- 3199 Fax-60-;f;4-31 11 vww.iaquintachamherorcoinmerce.corn •- 0 17 Page Twn 2002-2003 C-W-Oambn Connu ar for Services Proposal C. The "Gem" Newspaaer: This past year we increased our circulation to include all La Quinta residents and businesses as well as our members and prospective members. We have also upgraded the quality of paper and purchased new computer programs and equipment to improve the newsletter. Overall feedback on this publicatioindicates the newsletter is well received and of value to members and residents alike. There will be an increase in the cost for postage for the new fiscal year. Overall costs will also increase as our membership and the number of residents in La Quinta continues to rise. The newspaper is our most effective resource to reach a target audience promoting the City and Chamber. We will continue to investigate the possibility of future expansion to include circulation to the residents in the annexation survey areas. Anticipated increases in the total cost to produce ten issues of the newspaper during FY 2002-2003 will be approximately $5,500. Restructuring our ad rates should absorb the majority of this amount. Costs to increase the newspaper an additional four pages (1 spread) and to publish the Gem on a year round basis have been reviewed by the Chamber staff and Executive Committee. During this next fiscal year we would like to discuss the City's interest in increasing this publication to 12 issues. The contract for service dollar amount for The "Gem' Newspaper quill remain constant. C. The Visitors Center: This is a vital service we will continue to provide for the City. The continued media attention La Quinta is experiencing because of our growth and development justifies the staffing of our facility seven days a week during the season. Exposure from our improved website, the demand for more information and service from visitors, and the increased number of residents continues to have a significant impact on staff and facilities. Improvements to the facility combined with additional equipment/technology and a Professional staff and volunteers contributes to what we believe is an efficient and effective operation. We are pleased to report that we anticipate continuation of operating at this capacity with no increase in cost to the City. 155 vL Page Three 1001-1003 C71Y-aamber Contras for Services Proposal Su_ Operating under the same contract dollar amounts as last year, our request remains at $125,000 for FY 2002-2003. Last year the Board requested consideration be given to adjust the payment for services schedule to reflect the months of greatest impact to our budget created by The "Gem". The payment schedule we requested worked well within our budget and we suggest payments to continue as follows: July Payment $41,500 October Payment $21 000 January Payment $41,500 April 15 Payment $21,000 Thank you in advance for your support relationship with the City. We look forward to our continued 156 June 20, 2002 Staff Outlined for 2002/2003 Preliminary Budget City Manager - 5 minutes • Summary of Financial Condition • Summary of Preliminary Budget • Summary of Revenues 1. Expenditures 2. Review Items Listed on Transmittal Letter Finance Director - 15 minutes • A-2 - Review of budget process • A-5 - Review of budget format • B-1 - Present Organizational Chart • B-6 - Review of community profile which compares changes in the categories listed. • C-2 - Review of the Budget Summary by Fund which brings together the financial activities of all the City, RDA and Financing Authority Funds. • B-3 - Present General Fund Revenue Pie Chart which shows percentages. Mention that Pages D-1 through D-5 graph major revenue items and we are prepared to go over them if requested. • B-4 - Present General Fund Operating Expenditures Pie Chart - not net of reimbursement. This indicates in what areas the City is directing its efforts. • B-5 - Present City, RDA, Financing Authority expenditures by component - this is how each dollar of total expenditures is broken down. • Section E - Explanation of Department by Department overviews of City operations 15 . 0' • E-9 & E-10 - Explanation of format of the two budget documents which are tied together by the schedule of expenditures schedules. As an example, pages E-9 and E-10 are contained in each budget document. • C-5 - Review of reimbursements to the General fund from other funds - other funds pay for personnel and operating expenditures that are recorded in the General Fund. • H-1 & H-2 - Review of the City capital improvements approved by the Council in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. Question & Answer Period 158 FY 2002/03 - Major Highlight Full Year Funding for Second Motor Officer Full Year Funding for Gang Task Force Officer Capital Project Spending for FY 02/03 - $15,184,012 plus $43,500,000 in FY 2001 /02 for the Ranch Property Land Major Projects - Phase 2 Jefferson Street - $2,610,183 Museum Expansion - $1,675,000 Phase 1 of Municipal Library - $4,676,676 The Ranch Development - $2,500,000 plus $43,500,000 for Land appropriated in FY 01 /02 Revenues All Funds Anticipated Revenues . FY 02/03 $72,144,253 FY 01/02 $145,568,188 Comments: FY 01/02 RDA Project Area Capital Project Fund included $88,000,000 in Bond Proceeds from (RDA 2001 Bond Issue - $48,000,000 and 2002 Bond Issue - $40,0000,000) General Fund Budgeted Revenue - FY 02/03 $16,523,670 FY 01/02 $15,647,159 Major Sources of General Fund revenues Sales tax - 23% Last year 23% Hotel Room tax - 21 % Last year 27% Expenditures All Funds Anticipated Expenditures - FY 02/03 - $66,648,980 FY 01/02 - $129,849,016 Comments: Increased debt service payments to pay for capital projects and payment for The Ranch property General Fund Budget Expenditures - FY 02/03 - $19,799,351 Surplus FY 01/02 - $15,988,579 FY 02/03 General Fund $8,114 159 ATTACHMENT 4 City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Revenue/Expenditure Summary Five Year Forecast Operations Expenditures TOTAL OPERATIONS EXP Less: General Fund Revenues Sub -Total Variance Less: Reimbursements Gas Tax Fund Lighting & Landscaping Civic Center Developer Impact Fee Capital Improvement Fund RDA Reimbursements to General Fund Total Reimbursements Transfers In CDBG Urban Forestry COPS & LLEBG Grants Total Transfers Out Police/Fire GIP Information technology Total TOTAL VARIANCE Approved rive Year tstimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 19,802,551 21,085,300 22,311,932 23,611,826 24,788,706 25,818,073 19,802,551 21,085,300 22,311,932 23,611,826 24,788,706 25,818,073 16,493,670 17,455,532 17,719,300 17,990,200 18,268,900 18,555,400 (3,308,881) (3,629,768) (4,592,632) (5,621,626 (6,519,806) (7,262,673 569,900 829,700 203,831 406,614 1,398,000 589,800 829,700 203,831 406,614 1,398,000 610,400 829,700 203,831 406,614 1,398,000 631,800 829,700 203,831 406,614 1,398,000 653,900 829,700 203,831 406,614 1,398,000 676,800 829,700 203,831 406,614 1,398,000 3,408,045 3,427,945 3,448,545 3,469,945 3,492,045 3,514,945 30,000 0 0 30,000 0 0 30,000 0 0 30,000 0 0 30,000 0 0 30,000 0 0 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 2,000 122,250 0 122,250 0 0 122,250 0 0 122,250 0 0 122,250 0 0 122,250 0 124,250 122,250 122,250 122,250 122,250 122,250 4,914 (294,073 (1,236,337 (2,243,931 (3,120,011 (3,839,978 City of La fuinta Resource Allocation plan Revenue Summary Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 TAXES Property Tax 535,600 567,700 584,700 602,200 620,300 638,900 No Low Property Tax Distribution 704,700 722,300 740,400 758,900 777,900 797,300 Document Transfer Tax 387,670 399,300 411,300 423,600 436,300 449,400 Sales Tax 3,800,000 3,857,000 3,914,900 3,973,600 4,033,200 4,093,700 Transient Occupancy Tax 3,510,100 3,510,100 3,510,100 3,510,100 3,510,100 3,510,100 Franchise Tax 560,000 596,400 623,200 651,200 680,500 711,100 TOTAL TAXES 9,498,070 9,652,800 9,784,600 9,919,600 10,058,300 10,200,500 LICENSE & PERMITS Business License 175,100 175,100 175,100 175,100 175,100 175,100 Animal License 12,400 12,400 12,400 12,400 12,400 12,400 Building Permits 412,500 412,500 412,500 412,500 412,500 412,500 Plumbing Permits 89,400 89,400 89,400 89,400 89,400 89,400 Electrical Permits 68,000 68,000 68,000 68,000 68,000 68,000 Mechanical Permits 37,000 37,000 37,000 37,000 37,000 37,000 Misc. Permits 46,200 46,200 46,200 46,200 46,200 46,200 TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS 840,600 840,600 840,600 840,600 840,600 840,600 FEES General Government Fees 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700 Community Services Fees 187,300 187,300 187,300 187,300 187,300 187,300 Bldg & Safety Fees 357,800 357,800 357,800 357,800 357,800 357,800 Community Development Fees 239,400 239,400 239,400 239,400 239,400 239,400 Public Works Fees 467,500 481,500 495,900 510,800 526,100 541,900 TOTAL FEES 1,256,700 1,270,700 1,285,100 1,300,000 1,315,300 1,331,100 INTERGOVERNMENTAL Motor Vehicle In -Lieu 1,426,200 1,511,800 1,557,200 1,603,900 1,652,000 1,701,600 Off Hwy Vehicle License 0 0 0 0 0 0 Motor Vehicle Code Fines 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Parking Violations 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 Misc Fines 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 A6939 145,000 145,000 145,000 145,000 145,000 145,000 CSA152 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 FEMA/ OES Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 Historical Preservation Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 CVAQ Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Grants 0 0 0 0 0 0 County Fire Service Credit 1,698,000 2,405,532 2,477,700 2,552,000 2,628,600 2,707,500 3,534,200 4,327,332 4,444,900 4,565,900 4,690,600 4,819,100 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL INTEREST 1,359,100 1,359,100 1,359,100 1,359,100 1,359,100 1,359,100 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFERIN (TOTAL GENERAL FUND 16,493,670 1 17,455,532 17,719,300 1 17,990,200 1 18,268, 900 18,555,400 Summary of General Fund Revenues TAXES 9,498,070 9,652,800 9,784,600 9,919,600 10,058,300 10,200,500 LICENSE & PERMITS 840,600 840,600 840,600 840,600 840,600 840,600 FEES 1,256,700 1,270,700 1,285,100 1,300,000 1,315,300 1,331,100 li INTERGOVERNMENTAL 3,534,200 4,327,332 4,444,900 4,565,900 4,690,600 4,819,100 INTEREST 1,359,100 1,359,100 1,359,100 1,359,100 1,359,100 1,359,100 MISCELLANEOUS 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 TRANSFERIN 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 16,493,670 1 17,455,532 1 17,719,300 1 17,990,200 1 18,268,900 1 18,555,400 161 6 4 City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expense Summary By Program Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 GENERAL GOVERNMENT: LEGISLATIVE 666,585 686,300 706,700 727,700 749,400 771,700 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 715,373 749,300 784,900 822,200 861,400 902,400 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 905,719 930,800 958,700 987,500 1,017,100 1,047,600 PERSONNEL/RISK MGT 581,265 602,300 624,300 647,000 670,700 695,300 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 2,868,942 2,968,700 3,074,600 3,184,400 3,298,600 3,417,000 FINANCE: FISCAL SERVICES 616,026 644,700 674,600 706,000 738,900 773,500 CENTRAL SERVICES 587,994 605,600 623,800 642,500 661,800 681,700 TOTAL FINANCE 1,204,020 1,250,300 1,298,400 1,348,500 1,400,700 1,455,200 CITY CLERK 445,305 465,400 486,400 508,400 531,500 555,700 COMMUNITY SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION ADMIN 735,803 737,900 766,100 795,500 826,000 857,700 PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAMS 95,850 99,600 103,500 107,600 111,800 116,200 SENIOR CENTER 289,365 301,100 313,300 326,200 339,600 353,500 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 1,121,018 1,138,600 1,182,900 1,229,300 1,277,400 1,327,400 4,435,632 5,002,407 5,614,771 6,275,865 6,789,345 7,128,812 POLICE BUILDING & SAFETY: BUILDING & SAFETY - ADMIN 212,016 222,100 232,600 243,600 255,200 267,300 CODE COMPLIANCE 566,659 593,200 621,200 650,400 681,000 713,100 ANIMAL CONTROL 203,582 212,400 221,600 231,200 241,300 251,900 BUILDING 584,968 611,900 640,200 669,800 700,800 733,300 EMERGENCY SERVICES 35,390 15,300 15,800 16,300 16,800 17,300 FIRE 1,752,000 2,405,532 2,477,700 2,552,000 2,628,600 2,707,500 CIVIC CENTER BUILDING-OPER 1,020,063 750,661 783,561 817,561 851,761 887,061 TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY 4,374,678 4,811,093 4,992,661 5,180,861 5,375,461 5,577,461 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT-ADMIN 546,312 470,400 495,500 521,800 549,200 578,000 PLANNING 526,800 550,900 576,100 602,500 630,200 659,100 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,073,112 1,021,300 1,071,600 1,124,300 1,179,400 1,237,100 I PUBLIC WORKS: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 244,397 254,600 266,300 278,500 291,300 304,800 DEVELOPMENT & TRAFFIC 989,746 1,027,100 1,066,000 1,106,500 1,148,600 1,192,300 CAPITAL PROJECTS 337,755 351,300 366,600 382,500 399,100 416,500 MAINT/OPERATIONS- STREETS 1,113,960 1,150,200 1,195,500 1,242,800 1,292,100 1,343,500 MAI NT/OPERATIONS - LTG/LAN DSCAP I 1,593,986 1,644,300 1,696,200 1,749,900 1,805,200 1,862,300 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 4,279,844 4,427,500 4,590,600 4,760,200 4,936,300 5,119,400 TOTAL GENERAL FUND OPERATING EXP 19,802,551 21,085,300 22,311,932 23,611,826 24,788,706 25,818,073 TRANSFERS OUT 124,250 122,250 122,250 122,250 122,250 122,250 GENERAL FUND REIMBURSEMENTS I (3,408,045) (3,427,945) (3,448,545) (3,469,945) (3,492,045) (3,514,945) NET GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES L16,518,756 17,779,605 1 18,985,637 20,264,131 21,418,911 22,425,378 T 16-7) r City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan j Personnel Allocation Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 GENERAL GOVERNMENT: I LEGISLATIVE 0 0 0 0 0 0 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 PERSONNEL/RISK MGT 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 8 8 8 8 8 8 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT I FINANCE FISCAL SERVICES 7 7 7 7 7 7 CENTRAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 7 7 7 7 7 7 TOTAL FINANCE CITY CLERK 5 5 5 5 5 5 COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMUNITY SERVICE - ADMIN 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAMS 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 SENIOR CENTER 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 7 7 7 7 7 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDING & SAFETY: BUILDING & SAFETY - ADMIN 2 2 2 2 2 2 CODE COMPLIANCE 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 ANIMAL CONTROL 2 2 2 2 2 2 BUILDING 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 EMERGENCY SERVICES 0 0 0 0 0 0 FIRE 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIVIC CENTER BUILDING-OPER 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 19 19 19 19 19 TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - ADMIN 4 4 4 4 4 4 PLANNING 5 5 5 5 5 5 9 9 9 9 9 9 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC WORKS: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 2 2 2 2 2 2 DEVELOPMENT & TRAFFIC 5 6 6 6 6 6 CONSTRUCTION 3 3 3 3 3 3 MAINT/OPERATIONS - STREETS 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 MAINT/OPERATIONS - LTG/LANDSCAPING 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 21 22 22 22 22 22 i TOTAL -CITY PERSONNEL 76 77 77 77 77 i 77 POLICE 27 29 31 33 34 34 GRAND TOTAL 103 106 108 110 111 111 163 V�o City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division j Five Year Forecast I Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 GENERAL GOVERNMENT: LEGISLATIVE Salaries 38,400 38,400 38,400 38,400 38,400 38,400 Benefits 43,400 45,600 47,900 50,300 52,800 55,400 Services & Supplies Equipment 584,785 0 602,300 0 620,400 0 639,000 0 658,200 0 677,900 j 0 Total 666,585 686,300 706,700 727,700 749,400 771,700 Positions Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 164 City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 GENERAL GOVERNMENT: CITY MANAGER Salaries 496,700 521,500 547,600 575,000 603,800 634,000 Benefits 125,200 131,500 138,100 145,000 152,300 159,900 Services & Supplies 93,473 96,300 99,200 102,200 105,300 108,500 Equipment Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 715,373 1 749,300 1 784,900 822,200 1 861,400 902,400 -I Positions City Manager 1 1 1 1 1 1 Assistant City Manager 1 1 1 1 1 1 Management Analyst 1 1 1 1 1 1 Management Analyst 1 1 1 1 1 1 Management Assistant 1 1 1 1 1 1 Secretary 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Total 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 J .I6 ��8 City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 GENERAL GOVERNMENT: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN Salaries 0 0 0 0 0 0 Benefits 0 0 0 0 0 0 Services & Supplies 903,719 930,800 958,700 987,500 1,017,100 1,047,600 Equipment 2,000 0 0 0 0 0 Total 905,719 930,800 958,700 987,500 1,017,100 1,047,600 Positions Total I 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 G 6ks1 City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate �—,M)0-2-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 GENERAL GOVERNMENT: PERSONNEURISK MGT Salaries 156,600 164,400 172,600 181,200 190,300 199,800 Benefits 27,950 29,300 30,800 32,300 33,900 35,600 Services & Supplies 396,715 408,600 420,900 433,500 446,500 459,900 Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 581,265 602,300 624,300 647,000 670,700 695,300 Positions i Personnel/Risk Manager 1 1 1 1 1 1 Secretary 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Total 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 167 City of La Quinta Resource Allocation plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast it Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 FINANCE: FISCAL SERVICES Salaries 391,300 410,900 431,400 453,000 475,700 499,500 Benefits 116,500 122,300 128,400 134,800 141,500 148,600 Services & Supplies 108,226 111,500 114,800 118,200 121,700 125,400 Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Total 616,026 644,700 674,600 706,000 738,900 773 500 Positions Finance Director 1 1 1 1 1 1 Accounting Manager 1 1 1 1 1 1 Financial Services Assistant 1 1 1 1 1 1 Account Technician 2 2 2 2 2 2 Account Clerk Secretary 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 7 7 7 7 7 Total 166 v 1 City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007_08 i FINANCE: CENTRAL SERVICES Salaries 0 0 0 0 0 0 Benefits 0 0 0 0 0 0 Services & Supplies 587,994 605,600 623,800 642,500 661,800 681,700 Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 587,994 1 605,600 623,800 1 642,500 661,800 68 7700 Positions Total I —� — 0 0 0 0 0 0 166 City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 CITY CLERK CITY CLERK Salaries 255,900 268,700 282,100 296,200 311,000 326,600 Benefits 80,500 84,500 88,700 93,100 97,800 102,700 Services & Supplies 108,905 112,200 115,600 119,100 122,700 126,400 Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 445,305 465,400 486,400 508,400 531,500 555,700 Positions City Clerk 1 1 1 1 1 1 Deputy City Clerk 2 2 2 2 2 2 Secretary 1 1 1 1 1 1 Office Assistant 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total 5 5 5 5 5 5 170 ��3 City of La Quinta --� Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 COMMUNITY SERVICE ADMINISTRATION Salaries 224,100 235,300 247,100 259,500 272,500 286,100 Benefits 61,000 64,100 67,300 70,700 74,200 77,900 Services & Supplies 425,703 438,500 451,700 465,300 479,300 493,700 Equipment 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 Total 735 803 737 900 766 100 795,500 826,000 857700 Positions Community Services Director 1 1 1 1 1 1 Recreation Supervisor 1 1 1 1 1 1 Recreation Coordinator 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Secretary 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total L 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 171. City of La Quinta -- Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 COMMUNITY SERVICE PARK & RECREATION Salaries 32,200 33,800 35,500 37,300 39,200 41,200 Benefits 8,650 9,100 9,600 10,100 10,600 11,100 Services & Supplies 55,000 56,700 58,400 60,200 62,000 63,900 Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 95,850 99,600 103 500 107,600 111,800 116 200 Positions Recreation Coordinator 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Total i 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 I L--L 14.1 n i � J City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast I Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 COMMUNITY SERVICE SENIOR CENTER Salaries 109,700 115,200 121,000 127,100 133,500 140,200 Benefits 42,800 44,900 1 47,100 49,500 52,000 54,600 Services & Supplies 136,865 141,000 145,200 149,600 154,100 158,700 Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 289 365 301,100 313,300 326,200 339,600 1 353,500 Positions Senior Center Supervisor 1 1 1 1 1 1 Senior Ctr Activities Coord 1 1 1 1 1 1 Senior Center Assistant 1 1 1 1 1 1 _Total _ 3 3 3 3 3 3 I 173 it v City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 POLICE POLICE Salaries 0 0 0 0 0 Benefits 0 0 0 0 0 Services & Supplies 4,435,632 5,002,407 5,614,771 6,275,865 6,789,345 7,128,812 Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 4,435 632 5 002 407 5,614,771 6 275 865 6 789 345 7,128,812 Positions Patrol Officer 17 18 19 20 21 21 School Resource Officer 1 2 2 2 2 2 Target Team 3 3 4 4 4 4 Motor Officer 2 2 2 2 2 2 Gang Task Force Officer 1 1 1 1 1 1 Dedicated Sergeant 1 1 1 2 2 2 Community Service Officer 2 2 2 2 2 2 Total 27 29 31 33 34 34 171 G �'7 City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 BUILDING & SAFETY ADMINISTRATION Salaries 148,900 156,300 164,100 172,300 180,900 i 189,900 Benefits 36,550 38,400 40,300 42,300 44,400 46,600 Services & Supplies 26,566 27,400 28,200 29,000 29,900 30,800 Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 212 016 222 100 232,600 243,600 255,200 267 300 Positions Building and Safety Director 1 1 1 1 1 1 Senior Secretary 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total 2 2 2 2 2 2 175 i City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 BUILDING & SAFETY CODE COMPLIANCE Salaries 366,700 385,000 404,300 424,500 445,700 468,000 Benefits 114,100 119,800 125,800 132,100 138,700 145,600 Services & Supplies 85,859 88,400 91,100 93,800 96,600 99,500 Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 566,659 593,200 621,200 650,400 681,000 713,100 Positions Community Safety Manager 1 1 1 1 1 1 Senior Code Compliance officer 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! Code Compliance Officer II 1 1 1 1 1 1 Code Compliance Officer 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 Counter Technician 1 1 1 1 1 1 Office Assistant 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Animal Control / Code Compliance Officer 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Animal Control / Code Compliance Officer 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 1 7.5 7.5 Total 176 City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 BUILDING & SAFETY ANIMAL Salaries 103,100 108,300 113,700 119,400 125,400 131,700 Benefits 30,350 31,900 33,500 35,200 37,000 38,900 Services & Supplies 70,132 72,200 74,400 76,600 78,900 81,300 Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 203,582 212,400 221,600 231,200 241,300 251,900 Positions Animal Control Officer II 1 1 1 1 1 1 Animal Control / Code Compliance Officer 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Animal Control / Code Compliance Officer 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Total 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 17� City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING & SAFETY Salaries 366,700 385,000 404,300 424,500 445,700 468,000 Benefits 104,500 109,700 115,200 121,000 127,100 133,500 Services & Supplies 113,768 117,200 120,700 124,300 128,000 131,800 Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 584,968 611 900 540,200 669,800 700,800 733,300 Positions Building and Safety Manager 1 1 1 1 1 1 Senior Building Inspector 1 1 1 1 1 1 Plan Checker 1 1 1 1 1 1 Building Inspector II 1 1 1 1 1 1 Building Inspector 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Counter Technician 1 1 1 1 1 1 Office Assistant 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 Total 1- 7 8 City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate _1 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 BUILDING & SAFETY EMERGENCY SERVICES Salaries 0 0 0 0 0 Benefits 0 0 0 0 0 Services & Supplies 14,890 15,300 15,800 16,300 16,800 17,300 Equipment 20,500 0 0 0 0 0 Total 35 390 15,300 15 800 16,300 16,800 17 300 Positions Total I 0 0 0 0 0 0 179 ii . e) t, 4. City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 BUILDING & SAFETY FIRE I � Salaries 0 0 0 0 0 Benefits 0 0 0 0 0 Note 1 Services & Supplies 1,752,000 2,405,532 2,477,700 2,552,000 2,628,600 2,707,500 Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1,752,000 2,405,532 2,477,700 2,552,000 2,628600 2,707,500 Positions i i Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 180 G-" City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 I 2002-03 I BUILDING &SAFETY CIVIC CENTER OPERATIONS Salaries 39,900 41,900 44,000 46,200 48,500 50,900 Benefits 14,700 15,400 16,200 17,000 17,900 18,800 Services & Supplies 959,463 988,000 1,018,000 1,049,000 1,080,000 1,112,000 Equipment 6,000 0 0 0 0 0 Total 11020,063 1 1,045,300 1 1,078,200 1,112,200 1,146,400 1,181,700 Positions Facilities Maintenance Technician i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total 181 r: t City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION Salaries 305,700 321,000 337,100 354,000 371,700 390,300 Benefits 75,100 78,900 82,800 86,900 91,200 95,800 Services & Supplies 165,512 170,500 175,600 180,900 186,300 191,900 Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 546,312 570,400 595,500 621,800 649,200 678 000 Positions Community Development Director 1 1 1 1 1 1 Planning Manager 1 1 1 1 1 1 Executive Secretary 1 1 1 1 1 1 Secretary 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total _ 4 4 4 I 4 4 — 4 18 City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate -777 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Salaries 324,100 340,300 357,300 375,200 394,000 413,700 Benefits 89,200 93,700 98,400 103,300 108,500 113,900 Services & Supplies 113,500 116,900 120,400 124,000 127,700 131,500 Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 526,800 550,900 576 100 602,5( 630 200 659,100 Positions I Principal Planner 2 2 2 2 2 2 Associate Planner 3 3 3 3 3 3 Total 5 5 5 5 5 5 18 'j , City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION Salaries 154,200 161,900 170,000 178,500 187,400 196,800 Benefits 38,750 40,700 42,700 44,800 47,000 49,400 Services & Supplies 50,447 52,000 53,600 55,200 56,900 58,600 Equipment 1,000 0 0 0 0 0 Total 244,397 1 254,600 1 266,300 278,500 1 291,300 304,800 Positions Public Works Director / City Engineer 1 1 1 1 1 1 Senior Secretary 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total 2 2 2 2 2 2 .184 City of La Quinta 1 Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 I PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT & TRAFFIC Salaries 2911,500 313,400 321,100 345,600 362,900 381,001 Benefits 85,800 90,100 94,600 99,300 104,300 109,500 Services & Supplies 605,446 623,600 642,300 661,600 681,400 701,800 Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 989,746 1,027,100 1,066, 000 1,106, 500 1,148,600 1,192,300 Positions Senior Engineer 1 1 1 1 1 1 Associate Engineer 1 1 1 1 1 1 Assistant Engineer II 1 2 2 2 2 2 Assistant Engineer I 1 1 1 1 1 1 Counter Technician 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total 5 6 6 6 6 6 f R� 0 I;, City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION Salaries 172,700 181,300 190,400 199,900 209,900 220,400 Benefits 50,800 53,300 56,000 58,800 61,700 64,800 Services & Supplies 113,255 116,700 120,200 123,800 127,500 131,300 Equipment 1,000 0 0 0 0 0 Total 337,755 351,300 366,600 382,500 399,100 416,500 Positions Senior Engineer 1 1 1 1 1 1 Assistant Engineer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Assistant Engineer II 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total 3 3 3 3 3 3 _ 1 RR 0 City of La Quinta Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINTENANCE Salaries 381,100 400,200 420,200 441,200 463,300 486,500 Benefits 136,000 142,800 149,900 157,400 165,300 173,600 Services & Supplies 589,560 607,200 625,400 644,200 663,500 683,400 Equipment 7,300 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1,113,960 1,150,200 1,195,500 1,242,800 1,292,100 1,343,500 Positions Maintenance Manager 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Maintenance Foreman 2 2 2 2 2 2 Maintenance Worker II 3 3 3 3 3 3 Maintenance Worker 1 Total 4 4 4 4 4 4 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 187 0�0 City of La Quinta 1 Resource Allocation Plan Operations Expenditure Summary By Division Five Year Forecast Approved Five Year Estimate i 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 PUBLIC WORKS LIGHTING & LANDSCAPE Salaries 97,100 102,000 107,100 112,500 118,100 124,000 Benefits 24,850 26,100 27,400 28,800 30,200 31,700 Services & Supplies Equipment 1,472,036 0 1,516,200 0 1,561,700 0 1,608,600 0 1,656,900 0 1,706,600 0 Total 1,593,986 1,644,300 1,696,200 1,749,900 1,805,200 1,862,300 Positions Maintenance Manager 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Maintenance Foreman 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1819 :- i T4t!t 4 s(P Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of an Appointment to the Coachella Valley Economic Partnership Executive Board RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve the selection of a member of the City Council to serve on the Executive Board of the Coachella Valley Economic Partnership. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The Coachella Valley Economic Partnership (CVEP) approved a bylaw amendment in June 2001. The amendment called for two elected representatives from each end of the Coachella Valley to serve on CVEP's Executive Board. Attachment 1 is a letter dated June 21, 2002 from Michael Bracken, President of CVEP, inviting the City of La Quinta to designate an elected official to serve on the Board as one of the two East Valley representatives. For Fiscal Year 2002-2003 (October 1, 2002 - September 20, 2003), the cities of La Quinta and Rancho Mirage have first option to appoint an elected official to CVEP's Executive Committee. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve the selection of a member of the City Council to serve as a member of the Executive Board of the Coachella Valley Economic Partnership, or; 2. Do not approve the selection of a member of the City Council to serve as a member of the Executive Board of the Coachella Valley Economic Partnership, or; 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Jun reek, CIVIC City Clerk Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Letter from Michael Bracken dated June 21, 2002 �, ftr• 0 () r-) 4 ATTACHMENT 1 M, Valley .08 o a Coachella a y V 2 Economic Partnership 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 205 • Palm Desert, CA 92260 • 760/340-1575 or 1-800-596-1007 • Fax 760/340-9212 June 21, 2002 Mayor John Pena City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: MUNICIPAL APPOINTMENTS TO COACHELLA VALLEY ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP'S EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Dear Mayor Pena: At the June 2001 CVEP Board of Directors' Meeting an amendment to our bylaws was ratified providing for two municipal elected officials to be added to the CVEP Executive Committee. Subsequent to this action, a random rotation of municipalities was created so that all ten jurisdictions and the two tribal governments have equal opportunity to participate. For Fiscal Year 2002-2003 (October 1, 2002 — September 30, 2003), the cities of La Quinta and Rancho Mirage have first option to appoint an elected official to CVEP's Executive Committee. Time commitments for the Committee are actually relatively minor. We ask that the appointee be available for one (1) Executive Committee Meeting monthly and one (1) Board of Directors Meeting monthly. As of now, the Executive Committee meets the second Monday from 7:30-8:45 a.m. at Coco's Palm Desert and the Board meets on the third Tuesday from 7:30-8:30 a.m. at CVAG's Board Room. We know you agree that CVEP's efforts are vital to expanding and diversifying the economy of our Desert Paradise without compromising our quality of life. Your participation is important and needed. We respectfully ask you to consider this item at your next city council meeting. If you wish for a CVEP staff member to be present or have questions about this request, please give us a call at (760) 340-1575 or email at Mich.ael(Dacvep.com. Sincerely, Michael Bracken/ President and Chief Executive Officer Cc: Tom Genovese, City Manager 191 n�)4 Tit�v 4 XP Q&& AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: 3 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 16, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Consideration of Selection of a Voting PUBLIC HEARING: Delegate and an Alternate to the League of California Cities Annual Business Meeting - October 2 through October 5, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the selection of a voting delegate and an alternate for the League of California Cities Annual Business Meeting. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The FY 2002-2003 budget line item 101-101-637-000 contains $4,400 for this event. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Each year, prior to the League of California Cities Annual Conference, the member cities are asked to designate a voting representative and an alternate who will attend the business meeting, which is conducted as part of the annual conference. This year, Mayor Pena, and Council Members Henderson and Adolph are planning to attend the annual conference in Long Beach, CA - October 2, through October 5, 2002 (Attachment 1). It is important to note that the deadline for providing the League with this information is September 6, 2002. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1, Approve the selection of a voting delegate and an alternate for the League of California Cities Annual Business Meeting; or 2. Do not approve the selection of a voting delegate and an alternate for the League of California Cities Annual Business Meeting; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, June S. Greek, CIVIC City Clerk Approved for submission by: 'Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. League of California Cities Memorandum dated June 12, 2002 19^ 1 Better Cities —A Better Life June 12, 2002 To: From: Re: ATTACHMENT 1 Ledqe,OrfdfiffffliduCities f', -- (, t www.cacities.org The Honorable Mayor and City Council Beverly O'Neill, League President, Mayor, Long Beach Designation of Voting Delegate for League Annual Conference This year's League Annual Conference is scheduled for Wednesday, October 2 through Saturday, October 5, 2002, in Long Beach, California. One very important aspect of the annual conference is the annual business meeting where the membership takes action on conference resolutions. Annual conference resolutions guide cities and the League in our efforts to improve the quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government in California. It is important that all cities be represented at the annual business meeting on Saturday, October 5, at 10:15 a.m. at the Long Beach Convention Center. League bylaws state that "Any official of a Member City may, with the approval of the city council, be designated the city's designated voting delegate or alternate delegate to any League meeting. Designated voting delegates (or their alternates) registered to attend the Annual Conference constitute the League's General Assembly." To expedite the conduct of business at this important policy -making meeting, each city council should designate a voting representative and an alternate who will be registered at the conference and present at the annual business meeting. League bylaws provide that each city is entitled to one vote in matters affecting municipal or League policy. A voting card will be given to the city official designated by the city council on the enclosed "Voting Delegate Form." Please complete and return the enclosed "Voting Delegate Form" to the Sacramento office of the League at the earliest possible time (not later than Friday, September 6, 2002), so that proper records may be established for the conference. The voting delegate may pick up the city's voting card at the designated Voting Card desk located in the League registration area. The voting procedures to be followed at this conference are printed on the reverse side of this memo. Your help in returning the attached "Voting Delegate Form" as soon as possible is appreciated. If you have any questions, please call Lorraine Okabe at (916) 658-8236. Headquarters 1400 K Street Sacramento, CA 95814 916.658.8200 FAX 916.658.8240 Southern California Office 602 East Huntington Dr., Suite C Monrovia, CA 91016 626.305.1315 FAX 020.305.1345 194 ci A T4tyl 4 XP Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 16, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Consideration of Resolutions Authorizing the Levy of a Fire Protection Services PUBLIC HEARING: Special Tax and Calling an Election Thereon for the General Election of November 5, 2002 and Related Actions Regarding County Election Services, Ballot Arguments and Impartial Analysis RECOMMENDATION: A. Adopt a Resolution calling and giving notice of holding of a General municipal election to be held on Tuesday, November 5, 2002, for the purpose of submitting to the qualified electors of La Quinta, an ordinance relating to levying a special tax upon each parcel in the City for fire protection and paramedic services. B. Adopt a Resolution requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside to render specified services to the City of La Quinta relating to the conduct of a municipal election to be held on Tuesday, November 5, 2002. C. Adopt a Resolution setting priorities for filing a written argument regarding a City measure and directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis. D. Adopt a Resolution providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments for a City measure submitted at the municipal election. E. Select a member of the City Council to author the argument in support of the tax initiative, as well as a rebuttal, if necessary. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None by this action. If the Special Tax for fire protection and paramedic services is approved by two-thirds of the November 5, 2002 voters, it is estimated that it will generate approximately $1 .5 million in the first year of collection. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: The City's Charter provides the City with the ability to include an inflationary clause 19 in the special tax initiatives. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Before the City Council for consideration are the necessary resolutions for the purpose of placing a special tax initiative for fire protection and paramedic services on the November 5, 2002 ballot. The proposed tax is generally the same that was presented to the voters on March 5, 2002, and which was defeated by eight votes. Resolutions identified in sections A and B of the Recommendation portion of this report, when adopted, will place the same initiative on the ballot. Also included for consideration is a third Resolution, (section C of the Recommendation portion of this report) which, if adopted, would provide any one member of the City Council the first opportunity to provide a written argument supporting the tax initiative for the ballot document. If the City Council does not adopt the Resolution, another entity may submit an argument for the tax measure which would be published in the ballot document. It is also possible that no entity would submit a written position in support of the measure, in which case the ballot would not contain supporting language. The Resolution also directs the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis of the measure showing the impact it will have on the City. The written analysis will be included in the ballot document. Staff is suggesting that the City Council select one of its members at today's meeting to author the argument supporting the initiative, as well as the rebuttal, if necessary. The argument in favor may not exceed three hundred (300) words and must be submitted to the City Clerk by August 20, 2002. A fourth Resolution (section D of the Recommendation portion of this report) guarantees the City Council the right to include a written rebuttal on the ballot in the event that an argument against the tax measure is authored. It is possible that no entity would submit a written position in opposition to the measure, in which case there would be no need for rebuttal. If a rebuttal is necessary, it may not exceed two hundred and fifty (250) words and must be submitted to the City Clerk by August 30, 2002. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. A. Adopt a Resolution calling and giving notice of holding of a General municipal election to be held on Tuesday, November 5, 2002, for the purpose of submitting to the qualified electors of La Quinta, an ordinance relating to levying a special tax upon each parcel in the City for fire protection and paramedic services; and B. Adopt a Resolution requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside to render specified services to the City of La Quinta relating to the conduct of a municipal election to be held on Tuesday, November 5, 2002; and 19 Ili - 2 C. Adopt a Resolution setting priorities for filing a written argument regarding a City measure and directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis; and D. Adopt a Resolution providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments for a City measure submitted at the municipal election; and E. Select a member of the City Council to author the argument in support of the tax initiative, as well as a rebuttal, if necessary; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution calling and giving notice of holding of a municipal election to be held on Tuesday, November 5, 2002, for the purpose of submitting to the qualified electors of La Quinta, an ordinance relating to levying a special tax upon each parcel in the City for fire protection and paramedic services; and Do not adopt a Resolution requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside to render specified services to the City of La Quinta relating to the conduct of a municipal election to be held on Tuesday, November 5, 2002; and Do not adopt a Resolution setting priorities for filing a written argument regarding a City measure and directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis; and Do not adopt a Resolution providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments for a City measure submitted at the municipal election; and Do not select a member of the City Council to author the argument in support of the tax initiative, as well as a rebuttal, if necessary; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Tom Hartung, Director of Building & Safety roved for sub is n by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 197 V. RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2002, FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUBMITTING TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SAID CITY, INITIATIVE ORDINANCE NO. 2002-1 AUTHORIZING THE LEVYING OF A SPECIAL TAX UPON EACH PARCEL IN THE CITY FOR FIRE PROTECTION AND PARAMEDIC SERVICES WHEREAS, pursuant to the Charter of the City of La Quinta and under the provisions of the laws of the State of California, the La Quinta City Council desires to call a General Municipal Election which will be held in the City of La Quinta on the 5th day of November, 2002 for the purpose of submitting to the voters Initiative Ordinance No. 2002-1 regarding the levy of a special tax upon each parcel in the City for fire protection and paramedic services; WHEREAS, the City Council desires to submit to the voters at a General Municipal Election a proposed ordinance relating to the levying of a special tax for fire protection and paramedic services; WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized and directed by statute to submit the proposed ordinance to the voters; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to the Charter of the City of La Quinta and the laws of the State of California relating to General Municipal Elections, there is called and ordered to be held in the City of La Quinta, California, on Tuesday, November 5, 2002, a General Municipal Election to be consolidated with the Statewide General Election for the purpose of submitting to the qualified voters the following question: "Shall Initiative Ordinance 2002-1, authorizing the levy of a YES special tax on each eligible parcel in the City to fund fire NO protection and paramedic services, be adopted?" SECTION 2. That the proposed complete text of the ordinance measure submitted to the voters is as attached hereto as Exhibit A. 1.98 119/015610-0054 p 299669.02 PM02 -x Resolution No. 2002- Special Tax / Fire & Paramedics Adopted: July 16, 2002 Page 2 SECTION 3. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in form and content as required by law. SECTION 4. It is desirable that said General Municipal Election be consolidated with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date and that within the city, the precincts, polling places and election officers of the two elections be the same and that the Riverside County Election Department canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election and that the election be held in all respects as if there were only one election. SECTION 5. That the polls for said election shall be open at seven o'clock a.m. of the day of said election and shall remain open continuously from said time until eight o'clock p.m. of the same day when said polls shall be closed, except as provided in the Elections Code of the State of California. SECTION 6. That the City of La Quinta agrees to reimburse Riverside County for services performed when work is completed upon presentation of a bill. SECTION 7. That in all particulars not recited in this Resolution, said election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal election in said City. SECTION 8. That notice of the time and place of holding of said election is hereby given and the City Clerk is hereby authorized, instructed, and directed to give such further or additional notice of said election, in time, form and manner as required by law. SECTION 9. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original Resolutions of said City; and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. 19-11 119/015610-0054 299669.02PM02 �� Resolution No. 2002- Special Tax / Fire & Paramedics Adopted: July 16, 2002 Page 3 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 16th day of July, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 9()0 119/015610-0054 299669.02 PM02 Resolution No. 2002- Special Tax / Fire & Paramedics Adopted: July 16, 2002 Page 4 EXHIBIT A INITIATIVE ORDINANCE 2002-1 AN INITIATIVE ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.19 OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX FOR FIRE PROTECTION AND PARAMEDIC SERVICES WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority of California Government Code Section 53970, et seq., the City is authorized to levy special taxes for the provision of fire protection and paramedic services in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Section 53720, et seq. and Article XIIIC of the Constitution of the State of California; and WHEREAS, in order to accomplish the foregoing it is necessary to amend Chapter 3.19 to the City of La Quinta Municipal Code, THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City of La Quinta Municipal Code is hereby amended by deleting in its entirety the existing Chapter 3.19 enacted by Ordinance No. 166 on March 6, 1990 and amending Chapter 3.19 to read as follows: Section 3.19.010. Special Tax For Fire Protection and Paramedic Services. This Chapter shall be deemed to provide a supplemental and additional authority for the levy of special taxes for fire protection and paramedic services and shall be regarded as supplemental and additional to those powers conferred by California Government Code Section 53970, et seq. Section 3.19.020. Imposition of Tax. Pursuant to the authority of the Charter of the City of La Quinta and California Government Code Section 53970, et seq., there is hereby levied and assessed a fire protection and paramedic services special tax by the City of La Quinta on each parcel of property within the City of La Quinta. For purposes of this ordinance a "parcel of property" shall mean any legal parcel of improved or unimproved real property within the current or future boundaries of the City of La Quinta, including, but not limited to any vacant property, commercial/industrial property, single family residence, 201 119/015610-0054 ( �f 299670,01 PM02 1-% t Resolution No. 2002- Special Tax / Fire & Paramedics Adopted: July 16, 2002 Page 5 multifamily residential units, any condominium unit as defined in California Civil Code Section 783, or any other unit of real property subject to the California Subdivided Lands Act (Business and Professions Code Sections 11000, et seq. ). Section 3.10.030. Use of Revenue. (a) The purpose of this ordinance is to raise revenue only for the purposes of obtaining, providing, operating and maintaining fire protection and paramedic services, facilities and equipment, for paying the salaries and benefits to fire protection and paramedic personnel, and for such other necessary fire protection and paramedic services expenses of the City of La Quinta as such services shall be made available throughout the entire City. (b) The proceeds from this ordinance shall be used only for the purposes identified in subsection (a) of this Section. (c) Upon the effective date of this ordinance, the City Finance Director shall create a separate account into which all revenue raised by this ordinance shall be placed. (d) The City's Finance Director shall file a report with the City Council no later than January 1, 2005, and at least once a year thereafter which shall contain both of the following: (i) the amount of funds collected and expended under this ordinance; and (ii) the status of any project required or authorized to be funded to carry out the purposes set forth in subsection (a) of this Section 3.19.030. Section 3.19.040. Calculation of Amount. (a) The tax imposed by this ordinance shall be a tax upon each parcel of property and the tax shall not be measured by the value of the property. (b) For fiscal year 2003-2004, the maximum annual amount of said fire protection and paramedic services special tax shall be imposed upon each parcel of property in the City in accordance with the following schedule of amounts (the "Base Year Amount"): Residential Parcels Multifamily Residential Parcels Commercial/Industrial Parcels $85.00 per unit per year $50.00 per unit per year $610.00 per acre per year nr� 119/015610-0054 299670.01 PM02 ( ` t. Resolution No. 2002- Special Tax / Fire & Paramedics Adopted: July 16, 2002 Page 6 Hotel Parcels Residential Undeveloped Land Commercial/Industrial Undeveloped Land Golf Course Parcels $65.00 per room per year $10.00 per acre per year $10.00 per acre per year $15.00 per acre per year (c) For the fiscal year 2004-2005, the maximum annual amount of said fire protection and paramedic services special tax for each category of property shall be determined by multiplying the Base Year Amount for each lot within such parcel of property by an inflation factor of Three Percent (3.0%). For each succeeding fiscal year, the maximum annual amount of the fire protection and paramedic services special tax for each category of property shall be determined by multiplying the preceding fiscal year's maximum special tax by an inflation factor of Three Percent (3.0%). Section 3.19.050. Determination of Lots and Building Improvements. The records of the City of La Quinta shall be utilized to determine the number of parcels of property and the land use or zoning thereof for purposes of classification under Section 3.19.040(b). Section 3.19.060. Exempt Property. The fire protection and paramedic services special tax shall not be imposed upon a federal or state governmental agency, any local public agency, or any parcel of property which is exempt from ad valorem taxes under any other applicable law. Section 3.19.070. Time and Method of Payment of Special Tax. The fire protection and paramedic services special tax shall be due in two equal installments in accordance with the collection procedures of the Riverside County Tax Collector and the California Revenue & Taxation Code provisions for secured property tax collection, and shall be collected in the same manner, subject to the same penalties and interest, and on the same applicable dates as established by law for the due dates for the other charges and taxes fixed and collected by the County of Riverside on behalf of the City of La Quinta. The County of Riverside may deduct its reasonable costs incurred for such services before remittal of the balance to the City of La Quinta. 203 119/015610-0054 299670.01 PM02 4/ Resolution No. 2002- Special Tax / Fire & Paramedics Adopted: July 16, 2002 Page 7 The fire protection and paramedic services special tax, together with all penalties and interest thereon, shall constitute a lien upon the parcel of property upon which it is levied until it has been paid, and said special tax, together with all penalties and interest thereon, shall, until paid, constitute a personal obligation to the City of La Quinta by the person(s) who own the parcel of property on the date said special tax is due. Section 3.19.080. Administration of Tax. The City Council by not less than three (3) affirmative votes, is empowered: (a) To establish the amount of the fire protection and paramedic services special tax levy annually each fiscal year in amounts not to exceed the maximum amounts specified in Section 3.19.040 of this ordinance as is required to provide an adequate level of fire protection and paramedic service in the City in accord with the purposes set forth in this ordinance. (b) To sit as a Board of Equalization under procedures to be adopted by the City Council to equalize inequities and reduce hardships created by the literal application of this ordinance, and such shall be deemed an administrative remedy. (c) To annually provide an official Levy Book designating the actual tax levy on each parcel of property and to place the same on file in the office of the City Clerk. (d) To amend this ordinance as necessary to permit the Riverside County Tax Collector or any other duly designed public official to collect a special tax such as is levied by this ordinance in conjunction with other County taxes, or in order to assign duties established by this ordinance to other officers as otherwise permitted by law, or to modify procedures required by this ordinance, for the sole purpose of levying and/or collecting a special tax in an amount not to exceed that permitted by Section 3.19.040 of this ordinance to be used solely for the purposes permitted by Section 3.19.030 of this ordinance. Section 3.19.090. Unexpended Revenue. The unexpended residue of any money raised by the City under this ordinance may in the discretion of the City Council only be (i) used in succeeding years for the purposes stated in this ordinance; or (ii) used for lowering the next year's tax levy by the amount unexpended. 204 119/015610-0054 � 299670.01 PM02 Resolution No. 2002- Special Tax / Fire & Paramedics Adopted: July 16, 2002 Page 8 Section 3.19.100. Severance Provisions. If any provision(s) of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any other provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are declared to .be severable. The City Council and the electorate do hereby declare that they would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, parts or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 3.19.110. Effective Date. This Chapter 3.19 shall be effective only if approved by two-thirds (2/3) of the voters voting at an election to be held on November 5, 2002, and shall go into effect only at such time as the City Council has, in accord with the procedures required by law, declared that the special tax measure to be voted on at said election was approved by two-thirds (2/3) of the voters voting thereon. Except as provided in Section 3.19.080(d), upon becoming effective, Chapter 3.19 may only be amended or repealed by approval of two-thirds (2/3) of the voters voting on such amendment or repeal at a duly called initiative or referendum election. 119/015610-0054 299670 01 PM02 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO RENDER SPECIFIED SERVICES TO THE CITY RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2002 WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election is to be held in the City of La Quinta, California on November 5, 2002; and WHEREAS, in the course of conduct of the election it is necessary for the City to request services of the County; and WHEREAS, all necessary expenses in performing these services shall be paid by the City of La Quinta, California, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, does declare, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1. That pursuant to the provisions of § 10002 of the Elections Code of the State of California this City Council requests the Board of Supervisors of the County to permit the County Election Department to prepare and furnish to the City for use in conducting the election the computer record of the names and address of all eligible registered voters in the City. The County shall make available to the City additional election equipment and assistance according to state law. SECTION 2. That the City shall reimburse the County for services performed when the work is completed and upon presentation to the City of a properly approved bill. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk is directed to forward without delay to the Board of Supervisors and to the County Election Department, each a certified copy of this Resolution. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions. 20P, 119/015610-0054 299671.02 AM02 + Resolution No. 2001-139 County / Specified Services July 16, 2002 Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16th day of July, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City of La Quinta, (City Seal) CMC, City Clerk California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California '� 0 119/015610-0054 11 13 299671.02 PM02 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING A WRITTEN ARGUMENT REGARDING A CITY MEASURE AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election is to be held in the City of La Quinta, California on November 5, 2002, at which there will be submitted to the voters the following measure: "Shall Initiative Ordinance 2002-1, authorizing the levy of a YES special tax on each eligible parcel in the City to fund fire NO protection and paramedic services, be adopted?" NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That any member of the City Council shall have first priority in submitting a written argument for the City measure as specified above, accompanied by the printed name(s) and signature(s) of the person(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at least one of its principal officers, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 9 of the Elections Code of the State of California and to change the argument until and including the date fixed by the City Clerk after which no arguments for or against the City measure may be submitted to the City Clerk. SECTION 2. That the City Council directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the measure to the City Attorney. The City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the measure showing the effect of the measure on the existing law and the operation of the measure. The impartial analysis shall be filed by the date set by the City Clerk for the filing of primary arguments. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. 119/015610-0054 299672.02 PM02 Resolution No. 2002- Argument / Impartial Analysis Adopted: July 16, 2002 Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 16th day of July, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 119/015610-0054 299672.02 PM02 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR CITY MEASURE SUBMITTED AT MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS WHEREAS, Section 9220 and 9285 of the Elections Code of the State of California authorizes the City Council, by majority vote, to adopt provisions to provide for the filing of rebuttal arguments for the city measure (Initiative Ordinance 2002-1) submitted at the general municipal election to be held in said city Tuesday, November 5, 2002. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to Sections 9220 and 9285 of the Elections Code of the State of California, when the Clerk has selected the arguments for and against the measure which will be printed and distributed to the voters, the clerk shall send copies of the argument in favor of the measure to the authors of the argument against, and copies of the argument against to the authors of the argument in favor. The authors may prepare and submit rebuttal arguments not exceeding 250 words. The rebuttal arguments shall be filed with the City Clerk, accompanied by the printed name(s) and signature(s) of the person(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at least one of its principal officers, not more than 10 days after the final date for filing direct arguments. Rebuttal arguments shall be printed in the same manner as the direct arguments. Each rebuttal argument shall immediately follow the direct argument which it seeks to rebut. SECTION 2. That all previous resolutions providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments for city measures are repealed. SECTION 3. That the provisions of Section 1 shall apply only to the election to be held on November 5, 2002, and shall then be repealed. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions. r) 10 119/015610-0054 ( -� 299673.02 PM02 Resolution No. 2002- Rebuttal Arguments Adopted: July 16, 2002 Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 16th day of July, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 211 119/015610-0054 h� 299673,02 PM02 T4tyl 4 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of authorization for the City Manager and City Attorney to take all steps necessary to execute the City's rights under the bonds, including the initiation of litigation against American Motorists Insurance Company (Bonding Company) and BLP Desert (Lundin Development) as necessary to complete improvements for Parcel Map 29052 K03 AT IIILai 0 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION. S CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve the request authorizing the City Manager and the City Attorney to take all steps necessary to execute the City's rights under the bonds, including the initiation of litigation against American Motorists Insurance Company (Bond Company) and BLP Desert (Lundin Development) as necessary to complete improvements for Parcel Map 29052. None. None. Parcel Map 29052, Lundin Development, is located at the northwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50 (Attachment 1). Lundin Development is the developer of Parcel Map 29052. On December 7, 1999, the City Council approved the Final Parcel Map and SIA. Subsequent to the recordation of this map, Lundin Development sold Parcel 4 of this map to American Stores (Albertsons). Albertsons is not aggressively moving forward with their commercial development, and as a consequence, Lundin Development has indicated they are not in a position to move forward at this time with their master improvements for this Parcel Map. Under the terms of the SIA, the subdivider shall begin work within ninety (90) days and 212 complete the work within twelve (12) months from the date the SIA was approved. TAPW DEPT\COUNCI L\200 2\02071 6b. wpd Failure by the subdivider to begin or complete construction of the improvements within the specified time period shall constitute cause for the City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare the subdivider in default of the agreement. In this case, the failure to complete certain sewer line improvements may impact the orderly development of Tract 29053 (La Quinta Jefferson Fifty) and Rancho La Quinta (immediately north of Parcel Map 29052). The sewer line extension through Parcel Map 29052 is the downstream segment of a master planned sewer line which will ultimately provide service to a larger master planned area. Both the La Quinta Jefferson Fifty and T.D. Desert -Rancho La Quinta developers have expressed a concern that the failure to complete the downstream sewer line improvements will delay their respective projects. They feel that this sewer line extension is required under the terms of Lundin Development's SIA and conditions of approval (See letter dated June 26, 2002 from Rancho La Quinta - Attachment No. 2). On April 4, 2002 and on May 1, 2002, City staff conducted meetings with the respective developers in an attempt to resolve the issues in a mutually agreeable manner. At the May 1, 2002 meeting, staff indicated that if an agreement was not reached in a timely manner, it would be the City's responsibility to consider other actions to facilitate the construction of the sewer line. On May 8, 2002, in accordance with Section 14 of the SIA, City Staff issued a sixty (60) day notice of default to Lundin Development (Attachment 3). Under the provisions of Section 14, if the Subdivider fails to perform any obligation under the SIA and such obligation has not been performed within sixty (60) days after the written notice of default, the City may perform the obligation and the subdivider shall pay the entire cost of such performance by the City, including costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the City in enforcing such obligation. If the terms of the SIA and Conditions of Approval are not fulfilled within the 60 days, the City could find Lundin Development in default and proceed with the necessary steps to complete the obligation to construct the improvements. The sixty day notice of default expires on July 8, 2002, at which time the City may take action against American Motorists Insurance Company (the bonding company) and BLP Desert. On May 15, 2002, the City received a letter from the BLP Desert requesting that the period for the completion of the improvements be extended for an unspecified period of time. On June 4, 2002, the City Council denied the request for an extension of time. A follow up meeting was held on June 26, 2002, and, unfortunately, an agreement between the parties was not reached. 213 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020716b.wpd 4 0 0 4". [aid oil 0 I A The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Authorize the City Manager and the City Attorney to take all steps necessary to execute the City's rights under the bonds, including the initiation of litigation against American Motorists Insurance Company (Bondy Company) and BLP Desert (Lundin Development) as necessary to complete improvements for Parcel Map 29052, or; 2. Extend the time for the completion of improvements as specified in the approved Subdivision Improvement Agreement and define a specified extension time for Parcel Map 29052, Lundin Development. If this option is chosen, a dispute between La Quinta Jefferson Fifty and/or T.D. Desert with the City may arise, or; 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, .Roy F. Ste e son, P.E. Interim Publi orks Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Parcel Map 29052 2. Letter from Rancho La Quinta, dated June 26, 2002 3. Staff's Sixty Day Notice of Default letter, dated May 8, 2002 214 UO3 °'A""G' ' '�'"� ATTACHMENT 1 � ki� 215 0 01) IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RNERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PARCEL MAP NO. 29052 "11es1"� THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH FFVE-EIGHTHS OF THE SOUTHEAST r QUARTER OF SECTION 32. TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MEROM, ACCORDING TO THE OFFIC14L PUT THEREOF. 7 Wamer PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA c-fllc SCALE MAY 1999 ,w D BASIS FOR BEARINGS DE Msa MR "04S L10RN M m NM E OF M EAS, LA4[ * c Pot Ls 73 F0. ,' L/. M/TAC MM 2=M (DL OJT ACLL11t0 AS IIR COL 3 S/S. 3E 1/4 SEC. 32 P0 CR 34-133 THIS 1w 00WAM 7 ►MCELS AM 2 1E77EM WIS. , r c4 AIIFA : 1427 /CBEs NE( AKA 12-V ACAES NOTE: 116 NAP 4 VMMM FMW M f K MP KOUFIGNUOS Of M %*Dh"M INP ACT M INAT M AKA NAPM 6 ZONED WNAAORy1L SIGNATURE OMISSIONS A RJAACR IMEM n IN FAVOR Or M PAM N[ D A M com: aLA way Mipl 067RC7 FOR FU4L ROADS, PRA m [AS[A4NR AM *OHM-Of-rr FOR "OWL fVa.6. MC ES MO COROtIR OR w fOR M RMPOSE or MOQSS AND [OHMS FMM VMM LANDS K RCA S OF SLCM R01D5 AND MR DIE PURAY OF CON+CJMO FDOOATMO AID DOWSM VATCM 70 e"o" VrMM LANDS Of MANS Or f1JCN f70MM ORCHM MD CONDUITS. m 30-FOOT UK was WDOM 404 M EAR Arlo MM LANES FOR fULLC NIO,IrAYS POI MTP RCM NO. 32M2 11[CONmla A►AL 17. ,SSA, nNt" 0E MOM ONTICIAL R1TbIW. m CDffMJIE OF A 104007 UK U%DKNR M VANO1 W MOM TELLhOE Co~ Or CY101MA MR PUKE tJnuncs AD PCIDWA PUMVWA PER 09FF JMENT NIL 72ME RMOIDED AME iR. i9n IM476M COWRT ornC 1L R[COIO6 ® COITFR w 0r AN wown H01 TO mm a-rm M Of1CR WYCYION MM TK CO/IO6lE N FAVOR K RNEIML 001RA71ON D67RIC1 FM PUKX UIKMM SIMM AND DRESS, AND 111LYp WAL PUIPOSCS POt F61RU11CNT M. 23M24 NECOMM NDJOOM[A IL 19". RNERM C01M% 0MCnl RECORDS SHM 2 or 2 D1tn3 I H10 200 300 1 inch 100 feet FD. 1' LP. • LS 4149 MOM) BEM CM 94-133 ACCY.IED A3 K PER A 3/L7/CR -133 1 N 1322.911 LEGEND + FDWA.TOS NONIAENT rM D AS M D + PO CAMS Sv ,' 014" PVL 1s' Low.O TAGMD LCA. 23M. RUSH (-) M ATE3 RECORD WA PER LS. 73/ ® INMA S EASOIO/i RQEW X IRRM� V v o� h�� m EASENU f FOR MRYa M CANALS M FAVOR OF L4911M STALES PER DOOR 7. MK 210 Of ORIENTS (NCI RpRAtl) <�� /r% no I AVENUE 50AVENUE 50 10 - - - - — - NB9'511'28'W 1322.71' (NB751-24*W 1322.72') - - ,• V. TI/SAC RC[ 23233 (FLOW) NS/SA M-133, Act.Vi[D AS 1. COLS ! ,X SM. 32 PER AS-73/33, CM /4-133 A. 3/4' 1P. (OK O.n I III >o I I , 1 II 1 I II I �I I NII I I I I1 I 1 I I I I I ►D. I' V. ■/TAG LS 330E I (ON. 0.2) NO TILT. "M TAG I ACCE►MD AS Z Conk. SM 32AS 32 12 AM RS 73/S3. OR 34-133 7SW AVA44 , -zi Z �- IiiE MVvI `JNIMSRIG J -- Is SM- N ONVMW 006 FEB-18-19CIO 117: 30 ATTACHMENT 2 RANCHO LA QQUINTA. C0VNTF,Y CLUB June 26, 2002 Roy F Stevenson, P.E. Interim Public Works Director City Engineer 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Sewer Construction through fairway Plaza Shopping Center Specific Plan 98-034, Parcel Map 29052 Dear Roy: This letter will acknowledge your invitation to attend a meeting this morning in your office concerning the failure of Lundin to complete its sewer main and other improvements for which it is responsible for under their conditions of approval of their tentative map. As we discussed yesterday morning, due to prior commitments we will not be able to attend the meeting scheduled for this morning - Over the past several months we have struggled with the failure of Lundin to complete its required improvements, and have participated in discussions on how the consequences of their failures might be mitigated- As you are aware, the sewer line in question is part of a system which was designed in cooperation with adjacent landowners and approved by the Coachella Valley Water District ("CVWD"). Each land owner relied on the integrity of the other (and the conditional requirements placed upon each by the City) in designing their system, as CVWD did when it granted its approvals. As a result, we now have over three-quarters of a mile of sewer line in the ground with no outlet. Without the ability to progress the sewer service in these lines we will not be able to develop the 62 residences which comprise the next development phase at Rancho La Quinta- We were initially contacted concerning this matter in the first quarter of this year. Auer being aprised of the facts, we advised Luodin— in a meeting on April 8'', via letter on April 16` and again in a meeting held in your office on May 1 st, that the recordation of the easements necessary for the construction of the line was a prerequisite to our discussing substantively how we might participate in the installation of the line. To date that has not happened. Rather, Lundin continues to banter about the notion that "if we do something then they will do something". We steadfastly disagree. We already did something. We designed our sewer system in absolute reliance on their good faith representation that they would complete the service to the point of connection on 501h Street — which they are summarily refusing to do. HOME OE L167-98 7Q-285 RANCHO LN QUINTA DRIvf - LA QUANTA, CA 92.153 - 760.777-7 47 • FAX 764.777.7787 217 06-26-02 09:59 RECEIVED FROM: 007 FEB-18-19-00 17: ;1 P.U= Roy F. Stephenson, P.E. )une 26, 2002 Page 2 of 2 Time is of the essetx:c. The granting of the easements necessary for the construction of the subject line is more critical now than it ever has been — yet ) ,undin continues to be recalcitrant. Their failings in that regard will make it necessary to secure the easement through condemnation — a process which will take time which we have precious little of. More meetings to hear more of the same is not constructive in our opinion_ TT) believes that the City must take all appropriate action to compel h.,undin to install its sewer as required under its development agreement_ We would like to take this opportunity to thank you for the leadership you have shown in this matter, and wish you all the best in your future endeavors. Sincerely, p k a'Dowd 21 06-26-02 09 : 59 RECEIVED FROM: 008 ATTACHMENT 3 Shining Brighter Than P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 May 8, 2002 BLP Desert Mr. Leorard H. Lun4 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 207 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 RE: Parcel Map 29052 - 60 Day Notice of Default Dear Mr. Lundin: (760) 7 7 7 - 7 0 0 0 FAX (760) 777-7101 Please be advised that this letter serves as your notice of default for failure to begin or complete construction of the required improvements in accordance with the approved Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA). The SIA was approved by the City Council on December 7, 1999. Section 6., Completion of Improvements, of the approved SIA requires that the subdivider begin construction of the improvements within ninety (90) days and complete the improvements within twelve (12) months after the approval of the agreement. Failure by the Subdivider to begin or complete construction of the improvements within the specified time periods shall constitute cause for the City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare the Subdivider in default of the agreement. In accordance with Section 14., City Right to Cure, of the SIA, if the Subdivider fails to perform any obligation under the SIA and such obligation has not been performed within sixty (60) days after this written notice of default, the City may perform the obligation and the subdivider shall pay the entire cost of such performance by the City, including costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the City in enforcing such obligation. If the terms of the SIA and Conditions of Approval are not fulfilled within the 60 days, the City may find you in default and proceed with the necessary steps to complete your obligation to construct the improvements. Please call me at 760-777-7042 should you have any questions regarding this notice. Sincerely, oy F: Stephenson, P.E. Interim City Engineer/Public Works Director C.C. Tom Genovese, City Manger Katherine Jenson, City Attorney Lou Jones and Associates (American Motorists Insurance Company) T:\PWDEPT�STAFF\Schulze\Special Projects\PM29052\02-05-08 Notice of Default.wpd i ? 009 SPECIFIC PLAN P.N. C8510 SP Rancho Cielo Shopping Center December 1998 Revised per LQ Resolution 99-63 this development will take water service from an existing 18" water main in Avenue 50. The water main currently terminates approximately one quarter mile west of this development but may be extended closer by a nearby development. CVWD has indicated that they will require extension of the existing18" water main in Avenue 50 to the intersection with Jefferson Street. Installation of a 24" main in Jefferson Street along the project frontage will also be required, terminating at the north boundary of the site. CVWD anticipates providing a looped system to the north with future installation of a 24" water main from Avenue 48 to the north boundary of this project. The timing for completion of this 24" water system for Jefferson Street will depend on future developments as they are proposed, and will provide a backup water supply for this project at that time. 2.50 SEWAGE DISPOSAL 2.50.1 Sewer Service Description Based on preliminary discussions with Coachella Valley Water District, this development will connect to a future sewer main in Jefferson Street. If that main is not yet available when this development is constructed, the developer will construct or participate in the construction of a temporary connection to an existing sewer main located in the Citrus development, approximately one quarter mile south of Avenue 50. 2.60 UTILITIES 2.60.1 Existing Utilities iExisting and proposed utilities within or adjacent to the proposed development shall be installed underground. Power lines exceeding 34.5 kv are exempt from this requirement. The developer shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all above -ground utility structures, including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for aesthetic, as well as, practical purposes. COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of the Community Services Grant Application Requirements RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None for this action. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: At the November 2, 1999 City Council meeting, the City Council approved changes to the Community Services Grant process (Attachment 1). At the June 20, 2002 City Council meeting, the City Council discussed the Community Services Grant application and possibly not funding organizations in consecutive years (Attachment 2). Attachment 3 provides the Community Services Grant Application guidelines with the added condition of non-consecutive fiscal year funding. As provided in Attachment 3, the dates in which the Community Services Grant applications will be considered by the City Council are the first meetings in August, November, February and May of each fiscal year. Several inquiries have been received as to the Community Services Grant process for this funding year. It is anticipated there will be Community Service Grant requests presented for City Council consideration at the August 6, 2002 meeting. Attachment 4 provides a list of organizations that have been funded through the Community Services Grant program since 1996. S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.205.Community Service Grant Application..doc 2 2 1_ FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve changing the funding requirements of the Community Services Grant application to non-consecutive fiscal year funding; or 2. Do not approve changing the funding requirements of the Community Services Grant application; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respelctfully jubmitted, Dodie Horvit- immunity Services Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Minutes of the November 2, 1999 City Council Meeting 2. Guidelines for the Community Services Grant Application 3. Modified Guidelines for the Community Services Grant Application 4. Community Services Grants Since 1996 222 \\CLQADMFSI\SHARED\Community Services\CCReports\CC.205.Community Service Grant Application..doc rN ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Minutes BUSINESS SESSION P. November 2, 1999 1 . CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FOR THE ALLOCATION OF FUNDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $10,000 TO HIRE A CULTURAL RESOURCES CONSULTANT TO PREPARE GUIDELINES FOR THE CURATION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL COLLECTIONS. There were no changes to the staff report as submitted to the City Council by the Community Development Department and on file in the City Clerk's Department. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to continue the matter of hiring a Cultural Resources Consultant for the curation of archaeological items to December 7, 1999. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 99-150. 2. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING THE "ART IN THE GARDEN" EVENT TO BE HELD BY THE LA QUINTA ARTS ASSOCIATION AT 51-351 AVENIDA BERMUDAS ON NOVEMBER 20, 1999. APPLICANT: LA QUINTA ARTS ASSOCIATION. Mr. Herman, Community Development Director, advised that the La Quinta Arts Association is requesting to have an "Art in the Garden" event on November 20, 1999 from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Elaine Reynolds, 49-294 Avenida Vista Bonita, advised that she was available to answer questions. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to approve the request of the La Quinta Arts Association to hold one event on November 20, 1999, subject to conditions of approval and authorize staff to approve any future events with authorization from the Chamber of Commerce. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 99-151. mi�,,.3. CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT PROCESS. Ms. Horvitz, Community Services Director, asked for direction regarding the Community Services Grant process, and noted that recommendations from the October 5tn study session are outlined in the staff report. 223 City Council Minutes 5 November 2, 1999 Council concurred on taking up the recommendations one at a time. Recommendation #1 - requirement to provide checking account information with at least two authorized signatures on the account. Council Member Sniff didn't have a problem requiring two signatures. Council concurred. Recommendation #2 - requirement to provide documentation of financial solvency such as copies of bank statements. Council Member Henderson felt that a year-end bank statement would be beneficial in addition to the last three bank statements, noting that it would show that the organization is functional and has been in existence for a while. Mayor Pena agreed, and felt that the application should be typed, noting that computers are available at both the Senior Center and the library. He also felt that the application should contain a discrimination clause. Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, advised that a statement of non-discrimination could be added, similar to what is in the City contracts. Council concurred on requiring the last three bank statements, a year-end bank statement, a typed application, and a statement of non-discrimination clause. Recommendation #3 - quarterly consideration of grant applications. Council Member Sniff didn't have a problem with it. Council Member Adolph pointed out that quarterly versus annually means more work for staff. He supported twice a year. Council Member Henderson noted that under the current process, the applications are dealt with all year long. In response to..Council Member Perkins, Ms. Horvitz advised that applicants will be notified of the need to return their applications two weeks prior to Council's consideration. Council concurred on a quarterly consideration of applications. J, 224 UU%J City Council Minutes [-9 Recommendation #4 - Council to serve as reviewing body. November 2, 1999 Council concurred on staff reviewing the applications for completeness and submitting to Council for consideration. Recommendation #5 - ineligibility if CDBG award is made in same fiscal year. Council concurred on organizations oeing ineligible for a Community Services Grant if they have received a Community Development Block Grant the same fiscal year. Recommendation #6 - matching funds required for amounts over $1,000. Council Member Sniff felt that it's too demanding, restrictive, and unnecessary. Council Member Perkins agreed. Mayor Pena felt the intent was to keep organizations from looking to the City as their sole source of funding. Council Member Sniff suggested raising the limit. Council Member Adolph agreed, and suggested $2,500. After a brief discussion, Council concurred on requiring matching funds for any amount over $2,500. Mayor Pena wished to have the specific purpose or need listed on the application. Ms. Horvitz advised that the "Needs Statement" can be modified. Recommendation #7 - require matching funds for "seed" money. Council Member Henderson didn't feel "seed" money should be provided unless the organization provides three months of bank statements. Council Member Perkins suggested requiring matching funds for any requests for "seed" money. Council Member Henderson didn't have a problem with that. tiP V rl City Council Minutes 7 November 2, 1999 Council concurred on requiring matching funds for any amount requested for "seed" money. Recommendation #8 - establishing a funding cap. Council Member Perkins preferred leaving it at Council's discretion. Council Member Sniff felt it's unnecessary. Council concurred on not setting a funding cap. Recommendation #9 - limit organizations to non-consecutive years of funding. Council Member Perkins was opposed to the limitation. Council Members Adolph and Sniff agreed. Council concurred on not setting a limit for non-consecutive year funding. Ms. Horvitz summarized the changes as follows: applications must be typed and submitted with copies of last three bank statements, in addition to a year- end bank statement and contain a non-discrimination clause; funding requests over $2,500 will require matching funds and any funding requests for "seed" money will require matching funds within the same fiscal year; and the "Needs Statement" will be modified to require specific details on funding need. Recommendations #8 and#9 are deleted. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to approve the following changes to the Community Services Grant process: application must be typed, include copies of the last three bank statements and a year-end bank statement, and contain a non-discrimination clause; funding requests over $2,500 require matching funds and any funding requests for "seed" money require matching funds within the same fiscal year; and the "Needs Statement" will be modified to require specific details on funding need. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 99-152. 4. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM THE COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (CVAG) FOR A CONTRIBUTION OF $5,000 TOWARD A CENSUS 2000 COORDINATOR. Ms. Casillas, Management Assistant, advised that CVAG has requested that the cities contribute $5,000 each toward the hiring of a Census 2000 Coordinator. ATTACHMENT 2 LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES JUNE 20, 2002 A special meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at the hour of 10:00 a.m. by Mayor Pena. PRESENT: Council Members Adolph, Henderson, ABSENT: None PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Pena led the audience in the Pledge of Al PUBLIC COMMENT - None CLOSED SESSION - None CONFIRMATION OF AGEN Finance Direc and the budg onfir kins, Syor Pena AL YEAR 2002/2003 PRELIMINARY BUDGET. se presented a brief staff report. ess er presented major highlights of the preliminary budget In response,tc rCouncil Member Henderson, Mr. Falconer confirmed funding for the Phas I;Jefferson Street Improvements (Highway 1 1 1 to Indio Boulevard) 11 b,ti c place should that project get underway during FY 2002/2003. In -response to Mayor Pena, Mr. Falconer stated if a fire tax is placed on the ballot in November and approved by the voters, the tax revenues will be available in one year. In response to several questions regarding police services, Police Chief Horton reviewed the number of full-time police officers serving the City, including three 7 r, City Council Minutes 2 June 20, 2002 lieutenants who serve on a part-time basis. He confirmed La Quinta officers sometimes assist in situations in other cities and vice versa. He stated the ability to respond to La Quinta residents is not a problem because the Sheriff's Department has approximately 40 patrol cars and 10 unmarked cars on the streets in La Quinta, Coachella, and surrounding areas at a imes. He confirmed the use of cameras at intersections is a deterrent 1At`noted traffic speed is also reduced by having more officers on the strute feels a strong presence of officers is needed on Highway 1 , Y: o helptp, t car thefts and burglaries. ° y Council Member Perkins asked if additionz Chief Horton replied the City can always u get by with what it has for now. Mayor Pena commented on the number Horton stated he feels Wal-Mart is do.inc or officers are necf,e� to uvhich * motor officers 06' can also petty theftsxt Wal-Mart and Chief ample job tc`, `4eter such activities. Ed"posse to Mayor Pena, Mr. Falconer advised the only expenditure from the this year was $25,000 for the Bob Hope Chrysler Classic. He stated some police programs, such as Bike Patrol, were funded last year through grants. In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Genovese explained budgeted amounts not spent by the end of the fiscal year are returned to the General Fund and treated as surplus funds. He also noted the police department has City Council Minutes 3 June 20, 2002 already earmarked available grant funds this year for specific police programs, which was not the case last year. Therefore, any expenditure from the police contingency fund will affect the police department's ability to utilize those monies for additional police programs. He stated the amount shown on Page 7 for the La Quinta Arts Foundation last year should be corrected to read, $90,000" and that this year's requested amount is $100,000 lH noted the "Community Special Events" program (formerly Villag 'F6ire)` has not been developed yet but is listed per Council's direct"Q,n. In reeren _ to the request to purchase a backhoe, he advised funds ar ricluded in'tFa ,,bet to rent the equipment and staff is researching grant funds to p�af�ase�; . In response to Council Member HenderQ n, Interim Public Wo`�,k Director Stephenson estimated the use of a backhoeYytould be 8-10 times a month. In re ponse to CouncN) Membe111 dta1p113Ms. Horvitz confirmed the Boys and G .flub fundin U"est for flgt bintenance is an annual request. Council Membr Sniff suggested eliminating the Special Projects Contingency Fund or r �ucing it to $20,000 or less. He voiced disappointment with the Qu n` its Foundation's request, noting their application contains dated ,M 33 3`4He stated he has significant concerns about their current financial status. He was also disappointed the Chamber of Commerce has changed programs and is not involved with previous programs. In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Genovese stated the emergency reserve, which is a percentage of the General Fund and increases each year, City Council Minutes 0 June 20, 2002 was established years ago to ensure a specific amount of operating budget is set aside in case of interruptions in tax revenues, such as the motor vehicle fee. Council Member Henderson stated she supports an increase in police hours but would like more information on the Community Action Team. Council Member Perkins stated he would like to. ,consider"iddng` another motor officer at the mid -year budget review.Sam Council Member Henderson stated she we for the Bob Hope Chrysler Classic and agre Contingency Fund to $20,000. She W Chamber of Commerce Newsletter. S information on where the La Quinta Art; stated she was open to discussing some Count Comm and r:.ei d the C61ffiftiunity Action Team, mould help reduce crime by going flow to prevent burglaries. F involved with educating people ing the Cove area. They would Pena notedh would;g ';te_ pearance of increased patrols in the ber ,S It �qu boned the cost effectiveness and value of the ction Ted_ ti ps time. He felt current patrol hours are adequate nte,consi Ong it at mid -year budget review. thief Horton stets t ;e two team members would be beneficial, however, the City Manager ha's allowed $100,000 in the budget for programs and they will be able to pull officers in for those programs. He stated the City is getting good service with the funds it has available. a suggested adding to the $100,000 amount in a contingency Council Member Sniff preferred seeing how it goes with the first $100,000 amount before budgeting any additional funds. Council Member Henderson agreed with keeping the Community Action Team idea on the table for future consideration. She would also like for Council to City Council Minutes 5 June 20, 2002 consider additional patrol hours at mid -year budget review and she supports adding an additional $100,000 to the police contingency fund. Council Member Perkins commented on the possibility of considering those items prior to mid -year budget, and stated he would support adding an additional $100,000 for police programs. Chief Horton stated they already have progret up frytn itial $100,000 and can easily double the programs. MAI Mayor Pena stated he wished to see howteffectiue the progrrebefore utilizing the additional $100,000. Council Member Sniff suggested limiting the Bow QP Chrysler Classic amount to $25,000 and reducing the Community6Speciafatyto $40,000. Mayor Peria jj", ed the increases are not included in the budget. 4a►fa' ussion ensued wherein a consensus was reached on the following getamounts: Bob Hope Chrysler Classic - Ability $25,000; Boys & Girls Club Use - $30,000; Community Special Events - $40,000; Special Projects Contingency Fund - $20,000 (limiting requests to every other year); and La Quinta Arts Foundation - $100,000 (additional information to be obtained before allocation of funds). �31 n Ui~ City Council Minutes 6 June 20, 2002 Mayor Pena noted for the record he did not participate in the discussion regarding the La Quinta Arts Foundation funding request. City Attorney Jenson advised Council Member Perkins does not have to abstain from participating in the discussion regarding the Arts Found atiorr because it is not part of their building program. Mr. Genovese asked for Council's direction .,regerdin -p resulting from the additional $100,000 for lice pro Council Member Perkins suggested reduc�ng the arl`ditional a programs to $50,000 and adding to it late needed. � 3n Council concurred. RV Council Member Sniff asked if the Council's compensation/salary. Council Member Henderson st°fed s effective after the November: electior Council Member Perki it Member any 800 deficient lice an increase in an increase only if it is not support an increase. the new Council should deal with it. MOTION moved?b�uncil Members Adolph/Henderson to approve the Prelirnrf' :f=for Fist# Year 2002/2003 as amended. Motion carried with eincil Mem'fae „ ftvoting NO. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2002-88. ng no fukther business, it was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson ., ..N_ton carried unanimously. Res 611y submitted, JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California ATTACHMENT 3 T40t4a" P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO (760) 7 7 7 - 7 0 0 0 LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 FAX (760) 777-7101 COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT GUIDELINES The City of La Quinta offers the Community Services Grant program to recognized nonprofit organizations that benefit the residents of La Quinta. Priority for funding is granted to organizations that directly benefit La Quinta residents, second consideration is given to organizations that indirectly affect the quality of life for the residents of La Quinta. Individuals are not eligible for funding through the Community Services Grant program. Organizations that receive Community Development Block Grants from the City of La Quinta during the same fiscal year are not eligible for funding through the Community Services Grant program. ,organizations that have been funded are ineligible for funding for the next consecutive year. - Completed grant applications will be considered by the La Quinta City Council at the first Council meetings of August, November, February and May of each fiscal year. Applications are due three weeks before the scheduled City Council meeting. Once the application is placed on the agenda for City Council consideration, the organization will be notified of the date of the meeting for consideration. Applications must be typed. Incomplete applications will be returned to the applicant. Organizations requesting "seed" money are required to obtain matching funds from other sources in the same fiscal year before Community Services Grant funds will be released. Organizations requesting more than $2,499 are required to obtain matching funds from other sources in the same fiscal year. The City Council may authorize the release of up to $2,499 while matching funds are being secured by the organization. For more information on the Community Services Grant program, please contact the Community Services Department at 760-777-7032. P3^ CVRPD 1996.97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 Tota, LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL -BAND UNIFORMS $ 1,450.00 $ 7,320.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 5,200.00 $ 3,181.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 26,831.00 MISS LA QUINTA PAGENT $ 450.00 $ 750.00 $ 2.499.00 $ 2,499.00 $ .00 12,318318.00 HISTORICAL SOCIETY $ 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 15,869.00 $ 27,000.00 $ $ 1, 64 PGA WEST VOL. FIRE $ 2,500.00 ,869.00 LO SPORTS & YOUTH $ 2'869.00 DESERT BOOSTERS $=$6.200.00 - RRCCADV DESERT SANDS SCHOOL CV COUNSELING FRIENDS OF LQ LIBRARY $ 2,500.00 $ 3,700.00 HARVEST OF WELLNESSLQ FIRE BELLES LQ VOL. FIRE DEPT. $ 21500.00 $ 4.500.00 $ $ - 7,000.00 YMCA SHARE $ 2,000.00 $ 2.000.00 BOY SCOUTS $ 1,400.00 $ 1,400.00 DESERT STRING QUARTET $ HUMANE SOCIETY $ LIVING DESERT SYMPHONY WEST ARTS $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ $ 5,000.00 CV PUBLIC ED. FOUND. $ COMMUNITY CONCERTS LA QUINTA MIDDLE SCHOOL SPORTS PROG. $ 5,000.00 $ 5.000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ $ 20,000.00 PTA EARTHQUAKE $ FRIENDS OF LQ SENIOR CEN. $ COD BUSINESS CENTER $ CV CHILDCARE COUNCIL $ LQ AYSO $ 250.00 $ 250.00 ROUND TABLE WEST $ PD/LQ FOOTBALL CONF. $ CHILDREN'S THEATRE $ PALM DESERT HS BAND $ CHILDEN'S MUSEUM $ LA QUINTA ON STAGE MCCALLUM THEATRE $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ $ 45,000.00 SOAP BOX DERBY $ 3,650.00 $ 3,650.00 $ 2,600.00 $ 3,618.79 $ 2,600.00 BARBARA SINTRA CENTER $ 1,000.00 $ 10,918.79 SHERIFF'S DIVE TEAM $ 2,000.00 $ 1,000.00 SHERIFF'S PISTOL TEAM $ 2,000.00 CITY OF HOPE $ 1,500.00 1 $ 1,500.00 CULTURAL COMMISSION $ LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL-EUROPEAN TRIP $ 1,000.00 $ SCRAP $ 2,0000 $ $ 1,000 00 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1 $ 00.00 $ ,06, 1 $ 5,000.0000 LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS TRUST $_ 4.000.00 $ ,4000 2,000.00 $ 1,506.00 COMMUNITY GARDENS $ 2,500.00 $ 6,0.00 0 DESERT CHORALE $ 600.00 $ 2,500.00 FAMILY SERVICES OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY $ 2,000.00 $ $ 2,00.00600.00 FISH $ 1,400.00 $ 1,400.00 ORPAN PET OASIS $ 1,000.00 MONARCHS BASEBALL $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 MARTHA'S KITCHEN $ 2,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 GIRL SCOUT COUNCIL $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 SHELTER FROM THE STORM $ 1,000.00 VIPS-VOLTRS. FOR PUBLIC SAFETY $ $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 LA QUINTA OPEN AIR MUSEUM $ ,000.00 3 $ 3,000.00 IJULY 4TH GREATER DESERT FIREWORKS $ 1,000.00 $ .000.00 1,000.00 $ ,000.00 DESERT HOLOCAUST LA QUINTA ARTS ASSOCIATION $ COMMUNITY BLOOD BANK CENTER, INC. $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 12,000.00 ,. EXPLORER POST #503 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 3,000.00 LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 PEARL HARBOR SURVIVORS $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 REGIONAL ACCESS PROGRAM $ 500.00 $ - YMCA -SPORTS COMPLEX $ 8,310.00 $ 8,810.00 30ROPTMISTS $ .HEALS ON WHEELS $ 5,770.00 Is 4,070.00 -RIANGULAR ADOPTION $ 4,300.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 6,600.00 RELAY FOR LIFE $ 3,560.00 $ 3,560.00 A QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL ROTC $ 3,600.00 $ 3,600.00 USKEE AIRMEN MURAL PROJECT $ 2,499.00 $ 2,499.00 $ 4,998.00 :OACHELLA VALLEY ARTS ALLIANCE $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 ZIVERSIDE COUNTY CARE PROGRAM $ 60.00 $ 60.00 'ETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS $ 2,000.00 $ 2,499.00 $ 4,499.00 �MERICAN RED CROSS -FIRE VICTIMS $ 800.00 $ 1,125.00 $ 1,925.00 )ESERT SPECIAL OLYMPICS $ 8,500.00 $ 8,500.00 )ESERT REHABILITATION SERVICES Is 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 ETS EXPRESS $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 IONS CLUB — $ $ $ $ $ 46,019.00 $ $ 2,000.00 $ 1,000.00 2,500.00 1,000.00 2,499.00 2,499.00 56,300.00 2,000.00 $ 1,000.00 4 QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL CHEERLEADERS NITED CEREBAL PALSY $ 2,500.00 J HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL TEAM $ 1,000.00 $ 2,499.00 $ 2,499.00 $ 338,642.79 'ILDCATS SOFTBALL TEAM JTAL $ 52,970.00 $ 71,706.00 $ 57,287.79 $ 64,200.00 $ 3'1 D _ n x 3 m z T4'yl 4 aCP Qum& AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: / COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 16, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Consideration of Amended City of La PUBLIC HEARING: Quinta 2002-03 Marketing Plan RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None at this time. The amended City of La Quinta 2002-03 Marketing Plan proposes a financial component totaling $364,250, which represents the total cost of implementing the marketing programs included within the Plan. The increase from $347,750 (previously adopted Plan) to $364,250 (amended Plan) is due to the incorporation of an annual community newsletter, which is currently in the planning stages and has been funded in this fiscal year's budget. A breakdown of the total marketing budget, as amended, is reflected in the City's Preliminary Fiscal Year 2002-03 Budget as follows: Economic Development $173,950 Redevelopment $ 50,000 Finance & General Services $ 16,500 Community Services $ 48,800 Capital Improvement Program $ 75,000 TOTAL $364,250 The total includes carry-over funds for activities that were budgeted in fiscal year 2001-02, but were unable to be completed in part or whole. Specifically, those activities include the grand opening of the Civic Center Campus ($13,000) and the City's banner program ($6,000). CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: The City Charter allows the City "to utilize revenues from the general fund to encourage, support and promote economic development." The City's Marketing Plan is a key tool in promoting and supporting economic development in the City. 235 BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the April 2, 2002 City Council meeting, the City Council discussed marketing strategies, as presented by Kiner Goodsell, for fiscal year 2002-03. Pursuant to Council direction during that meeting, Kiner Goodsell developed the City of La Quinta 2002-03 Marketing Plan (Attachment 1) and presented it for Council consideration on May 7, 2002, at which time the Plan was adopted. Simultaneously, staff had been working on the Request for Proposals (RFP) process for marketing services for fiscal year 2002-03. During the May 7, 2002 meeting, the Council was informed of staff's progress to date, and advised that the selected firm would implement the 2002-03 Marketing Plan. Upon completion of the RFP process, the Marketing Review Committee brought forward its recommendation to the Council during the June 4, 2002 City Council meeting. The Council opted not to select a marketing firm at that time and, after some discussion, directed staff to bring back the adopted 2002-03 Marketing Plan for further Council consideration. The Council discussed the possibility of taking a new approach to the marketing program, especially in light of new City activities and citizen concerns. At the July 2, 2002 City Council meeting, the Council discussed the City's previously adopted Marketing Plan at some length and provided new input and direction. Accordingly, staff has amended the Plan to reflect the comments and suggestions made by the Council. The proposed amended City of La Quinta 2002- 03 Marketing Plan is provided as Attachment 2 in redline form. Changes were made in an effort to accomplish the following: 1) Make the City's Marketing Plan a generic City document, rather than a plan recommended by a specific consulting firm; 2) De-emphasize residential growth and opportunities relative to the City's marketing efforts; 3) Enhance educational value of existing programs and create a newsletter for informational purposes; 4) Strike references to specific local events (i.e., Mariachi Festival); 5) Discontinue the "Passport to Savings" program; and 6) Emphasize efforts to attract quality businesses to La Quinta. In addition to Plan approval, the Council may also wish to consider providing direction on Plan implementation given that several marketing projects would require immediate attention to minimize impact (e.g., ICSC conference in Palm Springs, City's infomercial). Professional marketing services may be sought on a retention/contract basis (i.e., hiring a marketing firm to fully implement the City's 2002-03 Marketing Plan) or on a project by project basis (i.e., hiring a marketing firm on a time and materials basis for specific projects). Alternatively, the Council may elect to delay implementation of the Marketing Plan and authorize staff to pare 236 002 back certain projects, such as the infomercial and advertisements, and maintain others, like preparation of collateral materials and attendance at the ICSC conference, on a minimalist level. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve an amended City of La Quinta 2002-03 Marketing Plan and provide staff with direction on Plan implementation; or 2. Approve an amended City of La Quinta 2002-03 Marketing Plan with changes and provide staff with direction on Plan implementation; or 3. Do not approve an amended City of La Quinta 2002-03 Marketing Plan; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Nam_ Q-� Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Adopted City of La Quinta 2002-03 Marketing Plan 2. Amended City of La Quinta 2002-03 Marketing Plan (Redline Version) 2.37 003 ATTACHMENT 1 /finer A� odsel City of La Quinta 2002-2003 Marketing Plan Prepared by: Kiner/Goodsell Advertising With the direction of the City Council and City Staff, Kiner/Goodsell Advertising has prepared a marketing plan for implementation by the City of La Quinta during the 2002-2003 fiscal year. In addition to evaluating past marketing programs and researching new marketing programs, Kiner/Goodsell has structured next year's marketing plan to continue communicating with the City's target markets and striving to reach the City's marketing goals and objectives, which are as follow: Target Markets • Local and national site locators and CEOs of prospective companies looking to expand or relocate their business • Site locators and businesses already interested in La Quinta as a new location for their business • Current La Quinta businesses • La Quinta residents; full and part-time • La Quinta visitors • Coachella Valley residents Goals/Objectives • Continue to attract new businesses to La Quinta in order to diversify the economy and tax base, for the purposes of offering new services for residents and visitors. • Communicate the significance and benefits of economic development growth to City residents in order to garner more favorable support for economic development within the community. • Help current City businesses grow in order to keep La Quinta businesses satisfied and profitable. • Educate residents of the community about valuable community services programs, and ensure the community is well-informed about those City programs. In focusing on those target markets and marketing goals and objectives, Kiner/Goodsell recommends implementing the following marketing plan, which includes the feedback and direction of the City Council: Economic Development Advertise in new publications — Kiner/Goodsell has identified new publications for reaching site locators and businesses looking to relocate, including: • Business Facilities • Shopping Centers Today 23 005 • Shopping Center World Update infomercial — As a proven effective tool for the City, the infomercial has several uses, including: • Broadcast in viable markets for economic development • Distribute to interested site locators and businesses • Broadcast in local market for community recognition Advertise in local publications — Continue to advertise in print vehicles such as the Palm Springs Life Desert Cities Progress Issue and the Bob Hope Chrysler Classic Program Guide — in order to maintain a presence in meaningful local publications. Implement public relations program to achieve national publicity and recognition — In the past, Kiner/Goodsell has handled local public relations efforts for the City. This year, it is recommended that public relations efforts work to gain exposure outside the Coachella Valley — specifically in trade publications read by site locators and CEOs looking to expand their business, such as Business Facilities, Franchise Times, Shopping Centers Today, Shopping Center World, etc. This additional PR in other markets will boost the awareness of La Quinta and help the City with its economic development messages. Update all collateral materials — Create fresh, new economic development collateral materials for distribution over the next three years — including a presentation folder, brochures and new photography depicting new "beauty shots" of the City. Data and revised statistics from the new Sedway Report, due in late 2002, would also be included. Increase presence at ICSC — The City could benefit by investing in a tactic that would assist in driving traffic to its booth at the Palm Springs convention of the International Council of Shopping Centers. For example, create a "Taste of La Quinta" cookbook to give away — collecting recipes from local restaurants. Then, at the City's booth, feature a chef from one of the local restaurants making samples of one of the cook book items for people to try (food is great for bringing people to booths). Revisit the passport program — If the passport program is successful this year, the City should consider repeating it again next year. This program is popular among local residents, and if the businesses benefit from the program, it would be a worthwhile effort for next summer, as well. Community Services Advertise opening of Civic Center Campus — Implement a major print and radio advertising campaign that informs the Valley about the new campus, and generates a large attendance to its grand opening event. Continue to advertise major Community Services events — Work closely with the Community Services Department to maximize exposure (within the department's specific budget parameters) for events such as the City Picnic, 5K Run, park and museum grand openings, etc. Implementation of the City's banner program — Research new areas within the community to implement the City's banner program, and create 3-4 different designs of banners for display during the Valley's busy season. Support local events — Continue to support local events which support the City's marketing goals, such as the Mariachi Festival. 239 006 /mer A� Goodsell 2002-2003 City of La Quinta Marketing Budget Economic Development Electronic Media $63 000 • Update infomercial and broadcast it in the Coachella Valley, the Inland Empire, San Diego and the Pacific Northwest. Revise 10-second and 30-second economic development TV spots and continue to broadcast during Coachella Valley newscasts and other local programming. Economic Development Print Media & Promo Items $51,500 • Continue to advertise in print media vehicles which most effectively reach the target audiences for economic development, such as the Palm Springs Life Desert Cities Issue, the Bob Hope Chrysler Classic Program Guide, site locator trade publications, etc. • Order new promotional items. • Maintain advertising contingency account. Economic Development Events $14,650 • Advertise in the ICSC Program Guide, and provide a new "draw" for the City's ICSC booth (i.e., cookbook and chef promotion). • Continue sponsorship of County Fair and National Date Festival. Update City Collateral Materials $28,000 • Update City collateral materials, such as economic development presentation folder, brochures, etc. • Take new professional photography shots of the City, specifically "beauty shots". Business Retention $30,800 • Continue with La Quinta Passport program, an upscale shopping/dining incentive program. Community Services Advertising $123 800 • Implement seasonal banner program (included in this budget figure are banner design and printing costs, as well as the costs to implement the banner poles -- $75,000 of which is part of the C.I.P. budget). • Support local events, such as the Mariachi Festival. • Advertise in support of the Civic Center Campus grand opening, as well as park and museum grand openings. Consultant Retainer $36,000 • Retainer fee to cover account service hours, planning, research, etc. TOTAL MARKETING BUDGET $M79750 007 ATTACHMENT 2 City of La Quinta 2002-2003 Marketing Plan Target Markets • La Quinta residents (full and part-time) • Local and national site locators and CEOs of prospective companies looking to expand or relocate their business • Site locators and businesses already interested in La Quinta as a new location for their business • Current La Quinta businesses ha Quinta r-esidei4s; fWl and pai4 time [move to top of list —make more of a priority] • La Quinta visitors • Coachella Valley residents Goals/Objectives City businesses grow R order- to kee.— 1- I<U .... a ustfiesses isfied — proms [move to bottom of list to allow community outreach to be more of a priority] • Educate residents of the community about valuable community services programs, ensure the community is well-informed about those City programs. • Continue to attract new businesses to La Quinta in order to diversify the econom and tax base, for the purposes of offering new services for residents and visitors. _- ._...__.... __.... • Help current City businesses grow in order to keep La Quinta businesses satisfied and profitable. f'I 4 1. 11: In focusing on those target markets and marketing goals and objectives, Kiflef GOE) the following marketing programs, h '. ine des the f _dbae__ _ a v Economic Development Advertise in new publications - Kiner,%Goodsell- as ideftt� ew publications MM lMM for reaching site locators and businesses looking to relocate, including: • Business Facilities • Shopping Centers Today Update infomercial - As a proven effective tool for the City, the infomercial has several uses, including: • Broadcast in viable markets for economic development • Distribute to interested site locators and businesses • Broadcast in local market for community recognition Advertise in local publications - Continue to advertise in print vehicles such as the Palm Springs Life Desert Cities Progress Issue and the Bob Hope Chrysler Classic Pro ram Guide - in order to maintain a presence in meaningful local publications. Implement public relations program to achieve national publicity and recognition - In Kiner4Geedsell has handled t t 4t r-ela4iens effefts for- the `ity. This year, it is recommended that public relations efforts work to gain exposure outside the Coachella Valley - specifically in trade publications read by site locators and CEOs looking to expand their business, such as Business Facilities, Franchise Times, Shopping Centers Today, Shopping Center World, etc. This additional PR in other markets will boost the awareness of La Quinta and help the City with its economic development messages. Update all collateral materials - Create fresh, new economic development collateral materials for distribution over the next three years - including a presentation folder, brochures and new photography depicting new "beauty shots" of the City. Data and revised statistics from the new Sedway Report, due in late 2002, would also be included. Increase presence at ICSC - The City could benefit by investing in a tactic that would assist in driving traffic to its booth at the Palm Springs convention of the International Council of Shopping Centers. For example, create a "Taste of La Quinta" cookbook to give away - collecting recipes from local restaurants. Then, at the City's booth, feature a chef from one of the M local restaurants making samples of one of the cook book items for people to try (food is great for bringing people to booths). Create an informational newsletter — Create an annual newsletter, after budget adoption, to be mailed to all La Quinta residents for purposes of informing citizens of the City's fiscal health and programs for the upcoming year. Community Services Advertise opening of Civic Center Campus — Implement a major print and radio advertising campaign that informs the Valley about the new campus, and generates a large attendance to its grand opening event. Continue to advertise major Community Services events — Work closely with the Community Services Department to maximize exposure (within the department's specific budget parameters) for events such as the City Picnic, 5K Run, park and museum grand openings, etc. Implementation of the City's banner program — Research new areas within the community to implement the City's banner program, and create 3-4 different designs of banners for display during the Valley's busy season. Support local events — Continue to support local events which support the City's marketing goals, sueh as the r r hi Festival. 0 1- 0 2002-2003 City of La Quinta Marketing Budget Economic Development Electronic Media $63,000 • Update infomercial and broadcast it in the Coachella Valley, the Inland Empire, San Diego and the Pacific Northwest. • Revise 10-second and 30-second economic development TV spots and continue to broadcast during Coachella Valley newscasts and other local programming. Economic Development Print Media & Promo Items $51,500 • Continue to advertise in print media vehicles which most effectively reach the target audiences for economic development, such as the Palm Springs Life Desert Cities Issue, the Bob Hope Chrysler Classic Program Guide, site locator trade publications, etc. • Order new promotional items. • Maintain advertising contingency account. Economic Development Events $14,650 • Advertise in the ICSC Program Guide, and provide a new "draw" for the City's ICSC booth (i.e., cookbook and chef promotion). • Continue sponsorship of County Fair and National Date Festival. Update City Collateral Materials $28,000 • Update City collateral materials, such as economic development presentation folder, brochures, etc. • Take new professional photography shots of the City, specifically "beauty shots." Business Retention $30,800 • Newsletter $16,500 • Create an informational newsletter to be distributed to City residents after budget adoption. Community Services Advertising $123,800 • Implement seasonal banner program (included in this budget figure are banner design and printing costs, as well as the costs for the banner poles — $75,000 of which is part of the CIP budget). • Support local events, sueh as the Mar-iaehi Fesfi a4. • Advertise in support of the Civic Center Campus grand opening, as well as park and museum grand openings. Consultant Retainer $36,000 • Retainer fee to cover account service hours, planning, research, etc. TOTAL MARKETING BUDGET $3649250 ?44 Ott Tityl " AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: 9 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 16, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: Consideration of a Change Order Proposal with Matich Construction for Median Modifications/Street Improvements to Construct Left Turn Lanes on Washington Street at Lake La Quinta Drive as Part of the Washington Street Rehabilitation Project No. 2001-02. STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve a Change Order with Matich Construction for median modifications/street improvements to construct left turn lanes on Washington Street at Lake La Quinta Drive as part of the Washington Street Rehabilitation Project No. 2001-02. • The following represents the project's approved funding and funding sources: General Fund: Gas Tax: Infrastructure Funds: RDA Project Area No. 1 Funds: Total Funding Available: Less Prior Expenditures: Amount Available: $32,666 $72,266 $561,068 $1,200,000 $1,866,000 ($74,933) $1,791,067 On June 18, 2002, the City Council awarded a construction contract in the amount of $689,684 to Matich Construction. The following represents the recommended project construction budget: Construction: $689,684 Insp/Test/Survey: $53,451 Administration: $34,484 Professional: $17,242 Contingency: $79,486 Total: $874,347 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2002\020716c.wpd 245 The estimated design and construction cost to be considered under this Change Order Request for the proposed left turn lanes is $75,000. As illustrated, there is $841,720 in remaining project funds. The remaining funding is available for the recommended improvements and is available for the Eisenhower Drive pavement rehabilitation, median and median island landscape improvements, which is currently in the design phase and may require additional funding at the time of bid opening, at which time staff will make the appropriate recommendation. 1. � 1 l �� • , None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: On June 18, 2002, the City Council awarded a construction contract in the amount of $689,684 to Matich Construction for the Washington Street Rehabilitation Improvements, Project 2002-02. Matich Construction is scheduled to proceed with construction later this month. The City Council directed staff to review the feasibility of constructing a full turn intersection at Lake La Quinta Drive and a future driveway into the St. Francis of Assisi Church. City Staff has had continuing discussions with St. Francis of Assisi Church and the La Quinta Arts Foundation regarding the proposed church site plan and site improvements (Attachment 1). The proposed site plan would entail the removal of the frontage road from Highland Avenue south, an extension of the existing church driveway to Washington Street to provide a right in/right out access, and the construction of a full turn intersection near the south end of the Church property (just north of the Arts Foundation driveway). The new driveway will align with the existing Lake La Quinta Drive and will ultimately be signalized, when warranted. The new drive will provide an opportunity for the Church Parking lot to access the new signalized entrance to the north and will provide access to the Arts Foundation drive, to the south. Once the new drive access is constructed, the existing Arts Foundation driveway approach will be removed. City Staff has discussed the proposed improvements with Warner Engineering (the Engineer of Record for both the Arts Foundation and the Church) who has indicated that both parties support the common driveway access and full turn, signalized intersection. However, to date, the Arts Foundation and Church have not formalized an agreement outlining access and improvement arrangements between the two parties. The median improvements can be constructed with temporary provisions which will restrict left turn movements into the Church/Arts Foundation and which will restrict left turn movements out of Lake La Quinta Drive until the west leg of the intersection is completed and the signal is installed. T:\PW DEPT\COUNCIL\2002\02071 6c. wpd 246 002 In order to accommodate the proposed full turn intersection, it will be necessary to modify the existing landscaped medians on Washington Street and Lake La Quinta Drive to create the proposed left turn lanes (See Attachment 2). Staff recommends that the median modifications be completed with the upcoming street overlay in order to achieve a seamless join between the newly overlaid street and the raised medians. The proposed median modification work is germane to the type of work currently in Matich Construction's contract number V. It is estimated that the cost of the design and construction of the median modifications will be approximately $75,000. This includes limited landscaping improvements as necessary to restore any damaged irrigation facilities and relocate displaced landscaping materials. Staff recommends that final landscape and irrigation improvements for the newly constructed median noses be accomplished with the Eisenhower Drive median improvements. When warranted, the design and construction of the signal improvements at the new intersection is estimated to cost $180,000. Possible funding for a future appropriation toward this signal may come from the General Fund, RDA 1 or 2 Capital Project Funds or Infrastructure funds. This signal is not currently identified in the current Transportation Developer Impact Fee (DIF). The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve a Change Order with Matich Construction for median modifications/street improvements to construct left turn lanes on Washington Street at Lake La Quinta Drive as part of the Washington Street Rehabilitation Project, Project No. 2001-02, or; 2. Do not approve a Change Order with Matich Construction for median modifications/street improvements to construct left turn lanes on Washington Street at Lake La Quinta Drive as part of the Washington Street Rehabilitation Project, Project No. 2001-02, or; 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. RespectfyNy submitted, ;,,&y F. StepN Interim Public (, P.E. ks Director/City Engineer T:\PW DEPT\COU NCIL\2002\020716c. wpd ?47 003 Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Letter From Warner Engineering (Consultant to the Church) to the City 2.Preliminary Left Turn Concept Plan ?48 004 Jul 02 02 09:3Ga WARNER ENGINEERING 760 341 5999 ATTACHMENT 1 7245 Joshua Lane, Suite B 73-185 Highway 111, Suite A ":"Warner Yucca Valley, California 92284-2968 Palm Desert, California 92260-3907 ZZ Phone (760) 365-7638 Phone (760) 341-3101 engineering Fax (760) 365-2146 Fax (760) 341-5999 • fIVIL ENGINEERING VLANNIN__^, LMIb SUM, YIWU Tune 28, 2002 Steven D. Speer, Senior Engineer City of La Quinta, Public Works/Enginering 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253-1504 Post -it" Fax Note 7671 Date -17 - ; -, paaf 10. ' To r rr C r ;' From !4 o f .o.IDept. i Co�� .d, Phone ri,..--� «.�,},;�? �*_ Phone ft Fax # .-^ . L Fax # w) r i Re: Letter of Understanding Between the City of La Quinta and St. Francis of Assisi Church Dear Steve, 451 Thank you for meeting with us on June 18'h to discuss the St Francis of Assisi conceptual site plan. We appreciate your cooperation in resolving critical site development issues such as traffic circulation and storm water retention. It is our understanding that the City would be in favor of closing or vacating the frontage road and extending the existing church driveway to Washington Street to provide a right in and right out only access. In addition to the removal of the frontage road, the City is supportive of the proposal to signalize the intersection of Washington Street and Lake La Quinta Drive near the south end of the Church property, thus providing opportunity for the Church parking lot access driveway to be connected to the west side of the intersection. It is also our understanding that St. Francis of Assisi Church would be responsible for retaining the 100yr storm water runoff produced by the proposed site development and that area tributary to the development. Preliminary hydrologic calculations indicate that volume to be approximately 7.2 acre feet. The Church acknowledges that a portion (ie 4.9 acre-feet) of the 7.2 acre-feet in storm water retention capacity the Church is obligated to provide is a result of offsite storm water emanating from the neighborhood north of the Church. The 4.9 figure represents an exchange of offsite tributary drainage areas in which the La Quinta Art Foundation (LQAF) is currently accepting 4.9 acre-feet of drainage that formerly, and historically, drained to the Church property. LQAF's acceptance of drainage that historically flowed to the Church property diminishes LQAF's ability, and capacity, to accept drainage from the neighborhood that it would otherwise accept if the Church were to reconfigure the recently constructed drainage facilities that currently keep the mountain runoff on LQAF property. It is our understanding that the City of La Quinta will need approximately 2.6 acre-feet of additional storage capacity to accommodate all of the storm water emanating from the neighborhood north of the Church, and that some of the additional storage capacity may have to be placed on Church property at City expense. We further understand the City plans to collect the runoff from the north neighborhood at Highland Palms Drive and utilize the frontage road right of way to appropriately manage the dry 49 JI_IL-2-2002 TUE Oe:24 TEL: HAME: 006 Jul 02 02 09:3Ga WARNER ENGINEERING 760 341 5999 City of La Quinta, Public Work s)'Engineering June 28, 2002 Page 2 of 2 weather drainage (ie nuisance water) via sandfilters, and as much of the storm water drainage, as possible. The balance of the 100-yr storm water flows not accommodated in the frontage road right of way, will be conveyed to a retention basin on Church property that will be oversized at City expense. As we discussed the first phase of the proposed improvements will be the parking lot and retention basin. It is our client's goal to have the parking lot improvements completed before the end of the year. Therefore your attention and cooperation in achieving that goal is greatly appreciated. Yours very truly, WARNER ENGINEERING By: Jonathan Hoy Project Engineer Cc: Vince Starace, Business Manager St. Francis of Assisi Jack Barker, Pastor, St. Francis of Assisi ?50 007 JUL-2-2002 TUE 08:25 TEL: NRIIE: ATTACHMENT 2 Z 0 mic =W WF Z ZZ 0 pN W4 �p �. Z WD WO oc� Zm o$ z� =W con 40 3°C t I ,, 5 1 008 T4'lvl 4 4 Qum& AGENDA CATEGORY: G� BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 16, 2002 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Consideration of a Funding Request for the PUBLIC HEARING: Palm Springs International Airport Art Pieces RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Dependent upon City Council direction, funding up to $10,000 could be allocated from the Special Projects Contingency Account #101-251-663-000 to fund this request. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the July 2, 2002 City Council meeting, under written correspondence, the City Council reviewed a request by the City of Palm Springs to complete the funding needed for three art pieces to be located the Palm Springs International Airport, as provided in Attachment 1. Staff was directed to research the use of the Art in Public Places fund for this request. Upon review by the City attorney, it appears Art in Public Places Funds would not be able to be used to fund this request, based upon the following information contained in Chapter 2.65 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (Attachment 2): 2.65.010 (d): Therefore, the city council declares that artwork in its various physical forms displayed in public venues in the city constitute public facilities of benefit to the citizens and visitors to the city and in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare, it is the policy of the city to require acquisition and installation of public artworks as provided in this chapter. 2.65.030 (c): "Art Site" means any site, upon which the artwork is to be located, on public or private property within the city, which is accessible and visible to the general public. n�� 2.65.080 ( c): Use and Maintenance of Art Work: Artwork acquired by expenditures from the art in public places fund shall be the property of and maintained by the city...." Based upon the information contained in Chapter 2.65, the requirements for the expenditure of Art in Public Places funds specify the art piece be located in the City and that the City own the art piece funded by the Art in Public Places account. The request for funding for the art pieces at the Palm Springs International Airport does not allow for the above listed conditions to be met for Art in Public Places funding. The City Council could consider using the Special Projects Contingency account to fund this request. The Special Projects Contingency Account has an uncommitted balance of $20,000 as of this report. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Authorize the funding request by the City of Palm Springs to fund art pieces at the Palm Springs International Airport in the amount of $10,000 to be allocated from the Special Projects Contingency Account; or 2. Authorize the funding request by the City of Palm Springs to fund art pieces at the Palm Springs International Airport in a different amount to be allocated from the Special Projects Contingency Account; or 3. Do not authorize the funding request by the City of Palm Springs to fund art pieces at the Palm Springs International Airport; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respect ullyJsub s Do ie Horvitz, Com Attachments: ed, ity Services Director Approved for submission by: sI Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 1 . Written Correspondence from the City of Palm Springs 2. Chapter 2.65 of the La Quinta Municipal Code 0, r 3 N ATTACHMENT 1 WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE ITEM: City of Palm. Springs Office of the Mayor i100 Tahquirz Cam on Wac • Palm Springs, California 9_'?6' TEL (-60) i 2;-8_10t) • FAX (-60) ;' i-820- • TDD (-60) 86-7-9>_'- June 11, 2002 Mayor John Pena City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear May ena: AJ&� The Palm Springs Intemational Airport is the Coachella Valley's premier gateway to our world -class resort area. As you know, there is only one chance to make a good first impression. The Palm Springs International Airport has been given the opportunity to make that first impression a truly memorable one. Internationally renowned artist Dale Chihuly has made available four of his superb glass sculptures for placement under the airport's imposing dome around the fountain in the new Sonny Bono Concourse. Funds have been raised to secure and install the first two of those sculptures. We need your help in purchasing the remaining two. The Coachella Valley's culturally sophisticated residents and visitors appreciate the fine quality of visual and performing arts that are available in all cities of this valley. We believe that the cultural enhancements which make our valley unique play a major role in attracting the tourists and residents who come here to live and play. We are confident that you believe this, too. That is why we are asking for your help in an undertaking to benefit our entire valley for countless years to come. Citizens of Indian Wells, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, Rancho Mirage and Yucca Valley have already contributed over $60,000 toward the purchase of the remaining two sculptures. Mrs. JoAnn McGrath has offered a matching challenge grant of $50,000 toward the total of $150,000 needed to complete the project. Only $39,500 is needed to make this dream a reality. On behalf of the Palm Springs International Airport, which serves all of our beautiful Coachella Valley, we are asking for assistance from the City of La Quinta in the amount of $10,000 to complete the dramatic masterpiece that will greet all airline travelers as they arrive in our valley. The donation will be permanently honored on a plaque near the artwork. We hope you will join us to enhance this gateway to our magnificent desert empire, which has become a world -class destination for so many people, including, no doubt, many of your friends and family members. Sincerely, William G. Kleindienst Mayor Post Office Box 2743 • Palm Springs, California 92263-2743 ') 5 Vl.v y �. „" �1 , � � 1 � �` ?\\ \: �.+ `� � ZQ � '�`�� \.�.� 1 �� ' � _ �• - � � � Jt R .� 1 � � 1 t y f 3Y^� .��' � � '� �� ,- �� y ` 4 � � � ' � � � � ..� .Y ? � i y `1t�7�y t ' \.1 � _.._ .. ' 1 � � 1 � �� 1 1 \, J llth Annual Best of the Best Collectible Artists Robb Report ,tune, 1999 Collectible Artists Expanding Influence Dale Chihuly's handblown glasswork sculptures renew excite►nent about an ancient craft. BY BARBARA DINERMAN normous handblown glass ceiling sculptures by Dale Chihuly float over the heads of admirers on several conti- nents, their wild colors and even wilder configurations inspiring awe. Likewise, the reputation of this Seattle - based artist hovers in exuberant mastery over his contemporaries. Chihuly's graceful basket sets, fiery chan- deliers, and variegated ripples and squiggles have'evolved into enormous architectural installations such as Chihuly over Venice, which displays 14 "chandeliers" over the canals and squares of Venice, Italy, and Crystal Cascade, a pair of 20-foot-high 1. Dale Chihuly 2. David Hockney 3. Frar:cesco Clemente 4. Fernando Botero S. Tomasz Rut Collectible AM "chandeliers" created for Benaroya Hall, home of the Seattle Symphony. The projects are becoming even more spectacular. Take the 1,000-piece Fiori di Como, which soars like a brilliant veil of glass over the lobby of the Bellagio Resort in Las Vegas, or the planned Bridge of Glass, a 600-foo•-long pedestrian bridge dotted with small pavilions displaying Chihuly glass in Tacoma, Wash., the artist's hometown. A newly commissioned work for the Citadel in Jerusalem celebrates the millennium. Chihuly's finished pieces have been called by one observer "the visual equivalent of rock and roll," and prices for the works run well into five figures, with a full installation, 0 3 a 25c 6 U, &. Chihuly has parlayed his blue-collar roots and his aseination with glassblowing into becoming an icon for his craft. such as a ceiling float, soaring into the millions. Even his preliminary drawings fetch $5,000 apiece. The artist, a vigorous 58 years old, brims with creativity. Chihuly remains busy at one of his four studios, develop- ing an alternative material for his 3-foot- wide glass floats. Polymer floats, molded in plastic, weigh much less than glass and could thus be made on an even larger scale than his already huge glass pieces. Chihuly has parlayed his blue-collar roots in Tacoma and his fascination with glassblowing into becoming an icon for his craft. Not only has he been a consum- mate student of the art, he has become a teacher, mentor, and administrator. After graduating from the University of Wash- ington in 1965, Chihuly attended Harvey Littleton's pioneering glass program at the University of Wisconsin, the only institution treating glassblowing as a serious art. He then earned a Master of Fine Arts degree in 1968 from the renowned Rhode Island School of Design, where he also taught until 1970, and won a Fulbright fellowship that enabled him to work in the Venini factory on the Venetian island of Murano, famous for its superb art glass. In 1971 he also cofounded the Pilchuck Glass School, now an interna- tional glass center located 50 miles north of Seattle. But the first sign that his work could capture prestigious attention came in 1976 when the Metropolitan Museum of Art bought three pieces for its perma- nent collection. Fortune collided with misfortune, however: That same year Chihuly lost the sight in his left eye in a car accident in England. Today, more than 20 years and at least a dozen awards later, Chihuly's work is included in more than 170 museum collec- tions worldwide. He is the fourth Ameri- can to have had a one-man exhibition at the Mus6e des Arts D6coratifs in Paris. Other contemporary artists command- ing attention include David Hockney, whose protean talents keep him in the forefront with his pop art -inspired, intensely colored images of California - style leisure. Francesco Clemente's strongly autobiographical works range from large oils on canvas to calligraphi- cally rendered erotic drawings. Fernando Botero's humorously corpulent figures of humans and animals have peopled outdoor spaces and stand in bronze counterpoint to Chihuly's massive glass installations. And Tomasz Rut's huge renderings of classical figures with the fashionably patinated canvases of gods, maidens, and nudes, revive high Renais- sance tradition. For now, however, Chihuly soars above the rest. 5 h vl.j Life is like glassblowing, says Chihuly (with James Kinnard, left, and J.P. Canlis). "If you know what you want tc do, you'll do it." Classroom Lessons Master artist Dale Chihuly shows at -risk students how not to blow it ames Kinnard holds a 5-ft.-long lead pipe with a glob of glow- ing hot glass at its tip. As he turns the middle section to and fro, shaping the molten glass, Terrance Prather blows into the cool end of the pipe, and Marlin Armstead steadies the glib with a wooden dip- PHn Tnr;PAPH� av PHn ¢rr"nFiFi n per. The trio's teamwork is exquis- ite; still, the oval begins to droop. "Uh-oh," says Prather. "Oh, man," groans Armstead. "We're gonna have to throw this one out," Kin- nard says ruefully. "No, no, let's do something kind of crazy with it!" master glass artist Dale Chihuly, 58, instructs the three teenagers. He tells them to keep turning, cooling, shaping and color- ing the orb for 15 minutes until it finally emerges as a stunning, 3-ft.- tall, Persian -blue vase with a crcnck lated neck. "That is some piece of work!" says Chihuly, issuing high fives to the apprentice artists. "Never toss something because it isn't perfect," he tells them. "Don't be afraid to see if you can make something wonderful, even if it started out wrong." The guys listen up. After all, Chi- huly, the most famous glass artist since Louis Comfort Tiffany, has helped them and hundreds of others do the same with their lives. In 1994 he and clo,,c friend Kathv Kaperick, PFnPi F ,_'3,e9 117 r) - tin ® teachers 7 M-P 3 "People came day and night," says Chihuly of his ice sculpture in Jerusalem. Chihuly added his own brand of magic to a canal in Venice (in 1998) with glass bulbs. "Her destiny was to do this program," says Chihuly of Kaperick (right, in his studio). 41, created the Hilltop Artists - in -Residence Program, an artistic alternative to the sometimes violent streets of their Tacoma, Wash., Hill- top neighborhood. Chihuly goes beyond slogans like Just Say No: He teaches at -risk kids to blow. On Oct. 26, the President's Com- mittee on the Arts and the Humani- ties in Washington, D.C., gave Chi- huly's Hilltop program a Coming Up Taller Award and a check for $10,000. The honors are welcome, but, says Chihuly, "I am getting from the kids at least as much as they are getting from me." They respectfully disagree. Whether it's in the "hot shop" or "glass class,, the tcrnagcr, .r��111 program, located atJa,on Lcc' Mid dle School, \yith proyidujg the hul, and education it takes to tashlon future. The No. 1 rule: Nohod\ gut, to take part who isn't in school or ;1 high school equivalency program. "Without glass class, I'd be lust," says Kinnard, 19, who discovered the program in 1996 when he ducked through its doors to evade police after throwing a chern homh into a passing car. "My homies and I go to the hot shop to have fun. I) ing things like blowing glass and making mosaics keeps us busy." Lucas Lowery, 20, agrees. He used to get up at dawn to teach glass- blowing to younger kids while earn- ing a high school diploma. "Chances o like this don't come around that 0 often," says Lowery who now plans to go to college. Chihuly knows about second o chances. The Seattle resident gre,,y up in Tacoma, where his father, George, was a butcher and union organizer and his mother, Viola, was a homemaker. When Chihuly was 15, his 21-year-old brother, George Jr., died in a naval training accident. Six months later, George Sr. also died, at 51, of a heart at- tack. "That," Chihuly says, "was a terrible time." His mother took a job as a waitress to support them. Shc made her son promise to go to college. He studied interior design at the nearby University of Puget Sound, but attended more toga par- ties than class lectures. Chihuly buckled down a bit after he transferred to the University of Washington in Seattle and discuy- ered the magic of glass. "One night I melted some stained glass bettiveen four bricks and blew a bubble," he says. That was it, Chihuly says. "I wanted to be a glassblower." But first he quit school and headed k)r Europe, immersing himself in art and archltCcture—and grmwmt, up III the process. "1 went from being a boy to a man," he says. He returned to school and gradu ated in 1965, then worked at a Seattle architectural firm and as a fisherman in Alaska before earning master's degrees from the University of Wisconsin (then the only U.s_ school with a glass program) y I in ly I, the Rhode Island Sch(216]. 118 7?'13'99 PEOPLE And on the seventh day, Chihuly rested (in'96 with his glass okra at L.A.'s Dorothy Chandler Pavilion) Design. That same year, he and a Scathe couple created the Pilchuck (;lass School, which would influence ncarl) every glass artist of the time. Just as his career was taking off in 1976, Chihuly was reminded that life, like glass, can be fragile. Travel- ng m England, he barely survived a car crash that cost him the sight in his Ictt eve. With it went his depth perception, crucial for an art form that requires working with materi- als heated to 2,500 degrees. His glassblowing days were over. But not his career. He became a master artist, directing a devoted st,lff of it) glasshlo, %C1s who csccutr hi, \\ ith Ili, ��ild h.lir, I�L1,1. roc Latch anci uhiquit„u', p.lint 'planer, d luau~, ( hlholl\ n,,t �,ill\ looks the part of an artist, he has become a celebrity, counting among his friends and collectors actor Robin Williams and painter David Hockney. (Chihuly's original work sells for between $20,000 to several million dollars.) Opening a new wing of London's Victoria and Albert ,Museum in October, Queen Elizabeth herself showed up to sleet (.hihuly and admire his chandelier gracing the rotunda. "She had on this great, bright -yellow dress with matching coat," he recalls, "and I was in my usual crazy colors, and photographers were going crazy!" "I Its pieces are ahsolurcly extr'l- ordinary artistic creations—raci11h- ing," sa%, Icrcim ;\dain')oll, ,c nior curator ut the Renwick (,,dlen ()t the tinlu11ti,mlxl ;Anleric.iu Art ."luseum, ml( of 1 00 mu seams to boast Chihuly, III their collecnuns. Some of (:hihulv's most spectacular creation, have been outside ntuscums. On Oct. 3, he unveiled a 40-ft.-long, S-tt.-high, -ft.-thick wall of tee in front of the Tower of David Museum in Jcru- salem. His gigantic sculp- ture signified, Chihuk says, "the melting of tensions" and was \ is- ited by some tens of thousands. ChthulV' will disrupt his jet -set travels on a dime it Kapertck—whom he cred- its with making, him sce that glassblowing could al - ter the course of young laves —calls. had the concept of how this could be done," he says. "1 was there to help out." Iic still is, generously lending his name and energy to fund-raising and teaching. Last year the kids asked Chihuly to help them make a chandcher thcv could sell to r;tisr num(:s for their program and a new one in I Puehk) In- dian conunL1m,% in I.los, N.Mcx. "%Vc \\ micd t,) do it, but we didn't kno�% haw," saes Luca; Lo��cr�. "So Dale got us started and we all had fun dom,, it," Nobody's having nlclrr tun than Chihuly himself. Ihnugh his hrst marriage ended in the c,irk '90s, he is now a doting father to Jackson, his 19-month-old son with Leslie ,Jackson. The toddler has the run of Chihulv's convcrtrd 40,(li)u-,q.-tr. former racing -hoot ill �cattic. The living "")ace includes an mdo,u lap pool and an y7-ft. clininc; table carved from a single Douglas fir tree, and Chihuly's personal hot shop is downstairs. But his heart is in the hot shop at Hilltop. "I low could you not want to help vuung pc() plu'" he ,11s. "It gives 11h, jog.„ . Christina Cheakalos . Karen Grigsby Bates m Se,ttie and 26 Macon Morehouse n ,v. J 120 vim CHIHULY STUDIO 1111 NW 50TH ST SEATTLE, WA 98107-5120 TEL 206 781 8707 FAX 206 781 1906 DALE CHIHULY Born in 1941 in Tacoma, Washington, Dale Chihuly was introduced to glass while studying interior design at the University of Washington. After graduating in 1965, Chihuly enrolled in Harvey Littleton's seminal glass program at the University of Wisconsin. Chihuly continued his studies at the Rhode Island School of Design (RISD), where he later established the glass department and subsequently headed the sculpture department. In 1968, Chihuly was awarded a Fulbright Fellowship to work at the illustrious Venini factory in Venice, Italy. While in Venice, Chihuly observed the Italians' team approach to blowing glass, which is critical to his studio today. In 1971 Chihuly co-founded Pilchuck Glass School, in Stanwood, Washington. With this international glass center, Chihuly has led the avant-garde in the development of glass blowing as a studio art and the broader contemporary interest in glass as an expressive medium. His work is included in over one hundred eighty museum collections worldwide. He has been the recipient of many awards, including honorary doctorates from the University of Puget Sound, the Rhode Island School of Design, and the California College of Arts and Crafts. Chihuly also has been honored with two fellowships from the National Endowment for the Arts, the American Council for the Arts Visual Artist's Award, and the Louis Comfort Tiffany Foundation Award. Chihuly has created many well-known series of works, among them the Baskets, Persians, and Seaforms, but he is most celebrated for large architectural installations. In 1995 he embarked on the multi -faceted international project, "Chihuly over Venice, " which involved collaborative glass blowing at factories in Finland, Ireland and Mexico, with the resultant sculptures mounted over the canals and piazze of Venice as part of that city's first glass biennial. Chihuly's recent architectural works include sculptures for the Bellagio Resort in Las Vegas, the Atlantis Resort in the Bahamas, and the Victoria & Albert Museum, London. In 1999, Chihuly mounted his most ambitious exhibition to date: "Chihuly in the Light of Jerusalem 2000." With support teams from Seattle and Israel he created 15 installations within the stone walls of an ancient fortress, now the Tower of David Museum of the History of Jerusalem. l'hc Desert Sun Sunday, April 21, 2002 E3 Desert Scene Glass artwork sparkles at airport fund-raiser Drinks were served as patrons roamed the airy Imago Gallery in Palm Desert on Fridav night during a fund-raising reception for the Palm Springs Intema- tional Airport. Hosted by Imago owners David and Leisa Austin, the free reception included cocktails, a full viewing of famed artist Dale Chihuly's glassworks and a con- tinual film of the artist at work on his pieces. Two glassworks from the pri- vate collection of Chihuly are al- ready installed at the Palm Springs International Airport. Two more pieces complete the installation and are reserved un- til July 2. The Palm Springs Public Arts Commission and the Airport Commission contributed 5150,000 to purchase the two glassworks now installed; 5150,000 more is needed to complete the purchase. "Ilic one-time-onlv fund-raiser was staged to raise $50,000 and guests were given a big incen- tive. Donor Joanne McGrath of- fered up a $50,00 matching grant towards the first 10 donors of $5,000 or more. Each of the first 10 donors of at least $5,000 — and one guest — would gain the opportunity to attend a pri- vate dinner and glass-blowing demonstration at Chihuly's boathouse studio in Seattle. Members of the Airport Com- mission and the Public Arts onunissiun mingled with guests and donors. Public Arts Commission Chairman David Aiken spoke about a third incen- tivc for donors. "We also have a Wings pro- gram for donors who raise cer- tain amounts of funds. They will be able to have their names on the pedestals in the airport for- ever." Chuck Cheeld, chairman of the Airport Commission described the efforts in acquiring Chihulv's work. "The commission is made UP of representatives from every city in the vallev. It's an ecu- menical, functioning body. "'I-hc Public Arts Commission cmnc to us and we think it is great what thev are doing. We agreed with the process of bring- iniz, art to public places," Cheeld ,aid. Cheeld also spoke of the im- pression Chihuly's glassworks would have on visitors to the cin. "Imagine his work outside undemeath the sun. It will be the first thing visitors sec when thcv arrive in Palm Springs." Aiken said the idea sprang "while wearing hard hats in a construction tunnel at the air- port. I knew we needed a great Art patrons: Sam Rubinstein (from left) and his wife, Gladys, supporters of artist Dale Chihuly and the Pilchuck Glass School in Stanwood Washington for 25 years, talk with gallery owners Michael and Leisa Austin at Imago Gallery Friday in Palm Desert. artist." Art in airports has been used in many ways. The San Francis- co Intemational Airport uses art in public places as a look at the different cultures of the city by showing local art and artists and works with themes relevant to the city and its history. Bishop Airport in Flint, Mich., is home to Lois Telcher's large paper air- plane sculptures that sit around the space as if just thrown. And Stockholm's Arlanda Airport displays artist Hans Strand's pic- tures of water in cooperation with Swedish UNICEF and ARTSPACE as part of an edu- cational campaign. Palm Springs Intemational Airport already hosts two Joshua Tree murals that represent the desert's indigenous traits. So why Chihuly? "Everyone knows Dale Chihu- ly's work," Aiken said, "and it is incredible. He had a house here at one time, and I really think his shapes and forms are amenable with our desert." According to Aiken, Chihuly visited the airport space himself to choose the location of the in - Notables: Chairman of the Palm Springs Arts Commission David Aiken (from left), Palm Springs Mayor Pro-Tem Jeanne Reller-Spurgin and Palm Springs International Airport Commission Chairman Chuck Cheeld gather at Imago Gallery on Friday in Palm Desert. stallation. Chihuly did not attend the event, but guests were shown a variety of his work from colorful bowls to fluid taffy -like hanging glass masterpieces. "This has been a labor of love," Palm Springs Art Com- missioner Leo Cohen said. "For the last two years we have been working on this acquisition." Although mayor William Klein- dienst was not at the event, may- or pro tem Jeanne Reller-Spurgin KIl' BERI,N, NICHOIS attended with city manager David Ready. "I think having Chihuly in the airport allows our community and people from all over the world to have a cultural experi- ence they wouldn't have other- wise," Reller-Spurg'in said. Also present at the reception were Councilman Chris Mills and his wife and Palm Springs Desert Museum's Executive Di- rector Janice Lyle. Diane Morgan, arts administra- tor tram the City of Palm Springs Department of Econom- ic Development was pleased with the turnout of the event. "I think it was a great success," she said. Kimberly Nichols is a e! Valley -based free-lance wnt r. t ATTACHMENT 2 2.65.010 . Chapter 2.65 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Sections: 2.65.010 Intent and purpose. 2.65.020 Findings. 2.65.030 Definitions. 2.65.050 Requirement to provide artwork or pay development fee. 2.65.060 Projects subject to art in public places program requirements. 2.65.070 Processing of arts application. 2.65.080 Regulations for artwork. 2.65.090 Development fee. 2.65.100 Credits —Agreements as to particular projects. 2.65.110 Art in public places fund. 2.65.120 Implementation and administration of this chapter. 2.65.010 Intent and purpose. A. This chapter may be known and cited as the "La Quinta Art in Public Places Program." The city of La Quinta has developed a nationwide reputation through the annual La Quinta Arts Festival and other artistic events, and attracts thousands of visitors every year to view and purchase art and crafts in the city. The public health, safety and welfare, the preservation and enhancement of property values and economic vitality, as well as the popularity and prosperity of the community, are dependent upon and enhanced by visually pleasing and high quality public art. B. The stated goal of the Cultural Resources Element of the general plan is to provide "enrichment of the community by adequate cultural and recreational facilities and activities. To implement this goal, the • general plan further states that "the cultural resources of a city encompass those facilities and programs which refresh, enhance or recreate people's bodies and spirits." Community parks, recreational activities, historic resources, library facilities and art festivals are included in this classification. The art in public places program is intended to achieve this purpose by providing visual art throughout the city. C. Residential and commercial development throughout the city will benefit from public art, both financially and visually. All property within the city will prosper through the enhancement and preservation of property values that will result from the location of visual art throughout the city. As such, the cost of providing public art should be shared. This program is a means of achieving a balanced responsibility of providing a cultural enhancement. ..:W,00 D. Therefore, the city council declares that artwork in its various physical forms displayed in public venues in the city constitute public facilities of benefit to the citizens and visitors to the city and in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare, it is the policy of the city to require acquisition and installation of public artworks as provided in this chapter. (Ord. 277 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1995: Ord. 173 § 1 (part), 1990) 2.65.020 Findings. The city council snakes the following findings in connection with the adoption of the ordinance codified in this chapter: A. There is a reasonable relationship between the acquisition of artworks through the art in public places program and the projects on which the fees provided by this chapter shall be imposed because: 1. Artworks will enhance the real property values within the city generally, including the developments on which the fees will be imposed, and 2. Artworks will, by enhancing the aesthetic values of the city as a whole, make the city an attractive place to live and work, thereby making the city more vital; and B . There is a reasonable relationship between the need for cultural amenities such as art and the developments upon which the fees provided for herein shall be imposed because the development of real property generally . necessitates that additional costs be incurred and amenities be provided to provide for harmonious and aesthetically pleasing environments created by the development; and 39 (U r.,i-1-99) vt:. 2.65.020 C. The amount of the fee is reasonably related to the artworks to be acquired because the amount of the fee increases as the value of the development upon which the fee is imposed rises, so there will be a direct and proportionate relationship between the size of the development and the quantity or quality of artwork which can be purchased from the fees generated by the development upon which the fees shall be imposed. (Ord. 277 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1995: Ord. 173 § 1 (part), 1990) 2.65.030 Definitions. As used in this chapter: A. "Arts application" means the application to be submitted by a project applicant pursuant to Section 2.65.070. B. "Art in public places fund" means the fund established by Section 2.65.110. •--.JMPC. "Art site" means any site, upon which the artwork is to be located, on public or private property within the city which is accessible and visible to the general public. D. "Artwork" means original creations of art including, but not limited to, the following categories: sculpture, murals, mosaics, fountains, and paving designs. These categories may be realized through such media as steel, bronze, stained glass, concrete, wood, ceramic tile and stone, as well as other suitable materials. E. "Commission" means the cultural arts commission as appointed in Section 2.75.030 of this Charter and municipal code. F. "Fee" or "fees" means the fees imposed by this chapter. G. "Projects" means all construction or rehabilitation in the city covered by a single building permit. H. "Project costs" means the value of the improvements for a project based upon the building permit valuation submitted. (Ord. 317 § 1, 1998; Ord. 277 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1995: Ord. 203 §§ 1, 2, 1992; Ord. 173 § 1 (part), 1990) 2.65.050 Requirement to provide artwork or pay development fee. When a project is subject to the requirements of this chapter pursuant to Section 2.65.060, the project applicant shall pay a development fee, as described in subsection A of this section, or shall comply with the • provisions of subsection B of this section. Project applicants shall indicate on their art in public places application whether the project applicant will comply with subsection A or B of this section. A. Development Fees. The project applicants shall pay a fee to be deposited in the art in public places fund established pursuant to Section 2.65.110 equal to the amount provided in Section 2.65.090 of this chapter for the project. B. Provision of Artwork. In lieu of paying the development fee as required by subsection A of this section, the project applicant may acquire and install an artwork on an art site on or in the vicinity of the project site pursuant to Section 2.65.100 of this chapter. As a guide, the cost or value of such artwork should approximate the amount of the fee that would be paid under subsection A of this section. The project applicant shall receive credit for the fee required by subsection A of this section only in the actual amount of the cost of value of artwork acquired and installed, plus costs of installation. Only project applicants liable for a fee pursuant to subsection A of this section that is in excess of five thousand dollars shall be permitted to elect to provide an artwork pursuant to this subsection unless such project applicant proposes to furnish artwork in excess of the amount of such fee and in a minimum amount of five thousand dollars. (Ord. 277 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1995: Ord. 173 § 1 (part), 1990) 2.65.060 Projects subject to art in public places program requirements. A. Requirements. The requirements of this chapter shall apply to all works of construction or rehabilitation for which a building permit is applied for within the city which constitutes or includes the following activities and which are not subject -to the exceptions set forth in subsection B of this section: 1. New commercial and industrial construction; 2. Remodeling, repair or reconstruction of existing commercial or industrial property having project costs which exceed one hundred thousand dollars in expenditures; 3. Residential subdivision or development of two units or more, whether by detached single-family residential structures, condominiums, apartments, townhouses or other dwelling units, including the repair, remodeling _ or renovation of same, having project costs exceeding one hundred thousand dollars; 266 (la Quinta 3-99) 40 2.65.060 4. Individual residential units (defined as not more than one single-family dwelling which is to be constructed • on an individual lot or parcel) having project costs of more than one hundred thousand dollars. B. Exceptions. The requirements of this chapter shall not apply to the following activities: 1. Public projects; 2. Remodeling, repair or reconstruction of structures which have been damaged by fire, flood, wind, earthquake or other calamity; 3. Nonprofit social service or cultural institution projects; 4. Low to moderate housing projects as defined by household income in Health and Safety Code Section 50093. (Ord. 277 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1995: Ord. 203 §§ 3, 4, 1992; Ord. 173 § 1 (part), 1990) 2.65.070 Processing of arts application. A. Upon submission of a project application for a project subject to the requirements of this chapter, the city shall provide to the project applicant a copy of the ordinance codified in this chapter and an arts application form. B. The project applicant shall submit to the city a completed arts application form, describing the manner in which the project applicant intends to establish compliance with this chapter. The arts application shall include, for project applicants intending to meet the requirements of Section 2.65.050(B), a complete description of the artwork, if any, the cost or estimated cost of the artwork and installation, the agreement or means by which the project applicant will meet the requirements of Section 2.65.100 of this chapter, and a site plan showing the location of the artwork, complete with landscaping, lighting and other appropriate accessories to complement the artwork. C. The city shall, upon receipt of the arts application, submit the arts application to the cultural arts commission. D. The cultural arts commission shall, within thirty days from the date of submittal of the application by the city, submit to the city council comments and a recommendation on the proposed arts application, based upon the guidelines set forth in Section 2.65.080. . E. The arts application shall then be submitted to the city council, which may ratify the application based upon the guidelines set forth in Section 2.65.080. (Ord. 317 § 3, 1998; Ord. 277 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1995: Ord. 173 § 1 (part), 1990) 2.65.080 Regulations for artwork. A. Guidelines. Guidelines for the approval of artwork shall include, but are not limited to, the following criteria: 1. The artwork shall be easily visible and accessible to the public; 2. The composition of the artwork shall be of appropriate materials in order to be durable against vandalism, theft and weather, and in order to require a low level of maintenance. The review may consider the proposed location of the artwork; 3. The artwork shall be related in terms of scale, material, form and content to immediate and adjacent buildings and landscaping so that it complements the art site and surrounding environment; 4. The artwork shall be designed and constructed by persons experienced in the production of such artwork and recognized by critics and by his or her peers as one who produces works of art; 5. The artwork shall be appropriately affixed to its site or display. B. Limitations. The following items are not to be considered as artworks: 1. Art objects which are mass produced from a standard design; 2. Decorative, ornamental or functional elements which are designed by a building architect as opposed to an artist commissioned for the purpose of creating the artwork; 3. Services or utilities necessary to operate or maintain the artwork. C. Use and Maintenance of Art Work. Artwork acquired by expenditures from the art in public places fund shall be the property of and maintained by the city. The city may dispose of such artwork at its discretion, subject to any agreement with artists or otherwise relating to any specific artwork. The artworks acquired and installed by a project applicant for which credit for the fee required by Section 2.65.050 is given pursuant to Section 2.65.100 of this chapter shall be the property of and maintained by the project applicant, except • to the extent the city has rights in or to the artwork or the display thereof pursuant to the agreement with the project applicant entered into pursuant to Section 2.65.100. Alternatively, artwork acquired by the project 41 (LaQ �6 l r; ul� 2.65.080 applicant in lieu of the fee may be donated to the city to be maintained by the city. (Ord. 317 § 4, 1998; Ord. • 277 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1995: Ord. 173 § 1 (part), 1990) 2.65.090 Development fee. There will be, and there is established, an art in public places fee (referred to occasionally in this chapter as the "fee" or "fees") to be collected as follows: A. Fees are to be collected with respect to all projects prior to or at the time of issuance of a building permit, except in the case of residential development of more than one dwelling unit, where the fee shall be collected on a pro rats basis for each dwelling when it receives its final inspection or certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first. The city manager, or other such person appointed by him/her, is appointed as the authorized individual to collect the fees. B. All residential structures whose project costs is in excess of two hundred thousand dollars will be charged a fee hereunder equal to the greater of: 1. One-fourth of one percent for that portion of project cost in excess of two hundred thousand dollars; or 2. Twenty dollars. C. All commercial developments, industrial developments and nonresidential development within the city will be charged a fee hereunder equal to the greater of- 1. One-half of one percent of the project costs; or 2. Twenty dollars. D. The fees will be collected prior to the issuance of any building permit commencing on the date the ordinance codified in this chapter becomes effective. (Ord. 339 § 1, 2000; Ord. 317 § 5, 1998; Ord. 277 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1995: Ord. 203 § 5, 1992; Ord. 173 § 1 (part), 1990) 2.65.100 Credits —Agreements as to particular projects. A. A project applicant may apply for a credit against the fee otherwise required to be paid by the project applicant under Section 2.65.050 of this chapter, of one hundred percent of the cost of an artwork and costs • of installation for including an artwork in an art site subject to this chapter, provided that such work shall be approved by the commission, and the project shall enter into a written agreement with the city providing that the artwork shall be installed, maintained and open to public view at reasonable hours for a minimum period of twenty-five years after installation. The written agreement may be extended by the city for ten-year increments. B. Nothing herein shall restrict the city council from waiving the requirements of this chapter, in whole or in part, with respect to any project otherwise subject to the provisions of this chapter; provided, that the city council determines that the project applicant has entered into an agreement with the city making provision for the acquisition and installation of artworks in connection with the development of the project which addresses the goals and aims of this chapter in a manner equally favorable to or on a basis more favorable to the city than would be achieved by strict compliance with this chapter. (Ord. 277 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1995: Ord. 173 § 1 (part), 1990) 2.65.110 Art in public places fund. A. Accounting. The fees imposed pursuant to Section 2.65.090 of this chapter and any other moneys collected in accordance with provisions of this chapter shall be deposited in a separate account, entitled the "art in public places fund." The city manager or his/her designee shall establish accounting records sufficient to identify and control these funds. The amounts held in the art in public places fund shall otherwise be accounted for, deposited, invested and expensed as provided by law and the practices and policies of the city. The account containing these funds may be invested along with other moneys of the city and the investment earnings thereon shall be used for and be subject to the same restrictions established in subsection B of this section. B. Use of Fund. Expenditures of the fees collected in the art in public places fund may include the following: 1. The cost of artwork and its installation; 2. The cost of purchase or lease of art sites; 3. Waterworks, landscaping, lighting and other objects which are an integral part of the artwork; • 4. Frames, mats, pedestals and other objects necessary for the proper presentation of the artwork; �6 (La Quinta 9-00) 42 2.65.110 5. Walls, pools, landscaping or other architectural or landscape architectural elements necessary for the • proper aesthetic and structural placement of the artwork; 6. Expenditures for maintenance and repair of artwork; 7. Administrative expenses to otherwise implement any provision of this chapter, however, in no event shall said administrative expenses exceed five percent of the total funds in the account on July 1st of any year nor twenty-five thousand dollars in any fiscal year. D. Endowments. The art in public places fund shall also be used as a depository for endowments, bequests, grants or donations. Such sums may be expended as set forth in subsection B of this section and for art exhibitions or displays as approved by the city council. E. Replacement. For those artworks that have been purchased with moneys from the art in public places fund or donated to the city, the city may determine to sell or exchange existing artworks for replacement artworks. Any funds obtained from the sale of artwork shall be credited to the art in public places fund. Artwork owned privately and on display by in -lieu agreement may be exchanged with city council approval or the original fee paid to the art in public places fund. F. Reimbursement. In the event fees have not been committed for a use as specified in subsection B of this section within two years of their collection, the fees in the art in public places fund shall be distributed by the city to the person or entity who has paid the fees or in any other manner permitted by law. (Ord. 317 § 6, 1998; Ord. 277 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1995: Ord. 173 § 1 (part), 1990) • • 2.65.120 Implementation and administration of this chapter. The city may enter into agreements, upon recommendation of the cultural arts commission or otherwise, for the purchase or commissioning of artworks on art sites not owned by the city, for installation of artwork or the repair, maintenance of servicing thereof and for or relating to all other matters necessary or appropriate to implement the art in public places program. (Ord. 317 § 7, 1998: Ord. 277 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1996) 42-1 n r �n REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: 15, INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD Meeting June 12, 2002 CALL TO ORDER Regular meeting of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board was called to order at the hour of 5:30 P.M. by Chairman Mahfoud, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. PRESENT: Board Members Moulin, Osborne, and Felice (via videoconference) and Chairman Mahfoud ABSENT: Board Member Olander and Lewis OTHERS PRESENT: John Falconer, Finance Director, Kurt Mortenson prospective Board Member, Tom Genovese, City Manager and Kathy Jenson, City Attorney 11 PUBLIC COMMENT - None III CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA IV CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approval of Minutes of Meeting on May 8, 2002 for the Investment Advisory Board. Board Member Moulin advised the Board that on page 5, last paragraph, last sentence the following word should be replaced: Mr. Sherwood stated that he has asked for writtenme assurance from the State Board Member Moulin advised that Board that on page 6, first paragraph, sixth sentence, the following word should be deleted: Mr. Falconer also stated that if the City of P71 Investment Advisory Board Minutes June 12, 2002 MOTION - It was moved by Board Members Moulin/Osborne to approve the minutes of May 8, 2002 as corrected. Motion carried unanimously. V. BUSINESS SESSION A. Transmittal of Treasury Report for April 2002. Mr. Falconer informed the Board that on page 010, the average maturity has gone from 35 days to 79 days; Mr. Falconer stated at this current time this is beneficial due to the current interest rates. Mr. Falconer also advised the Board that on page 003, the overall performance is currently meeting the City's benchmark with the yield at the 2% range. Mr. Falconer advised the Board that in reference to cash, that there was not much fluctuation in the portfolio, currently which at around $100 million. Mr. Falconer advised the Board that at the May meeting, Board Member Lewis suggested that the heading on page 004, be changed to "Yield." Mr. Falconer stated that he would check the Trade Ticket to see how the ticket is titled and will report back to the Board at the July meeting. In response to Board Member Osborne, Mr. Falconer advised the Board that on page 004, the $5 million investment's terms are as follows; 10/31 /02 and 3/31 /04, which were placed out to two years. Board Member Osborne asked if the proposed Investment Policy is approved, will an additional $10 million be invested for longer terms? Mr. Falconer replied to the Board that due to the current interest rates he will not take out an additional $10 million for investments. Board Member Osborne asked if the City had received the taxes in the month of May? Mr. Falconer replied that the City received approximately $12 million on the 31" of May, at about 2:00 p.m. Board Member Osborne asked where the money was going to be applied? Mr. Falconer stated that staff is currently calculating what the pass through payments are and reinvesting in commercial paper the week of June 24`h MOTION - It was moved by Board Members Osborne/Moulin to review, receive and file the Treasurer's Report for April 2002. Motion carried unanimously. 161 !' 7 1 Investment Advisory Board June 12, 2002 Minutes B. Consideration of Fiscal Year 2002/03 Investment Policy The Board reviewed the attached Investment Policy and changes/additions/deletions are shown in amended form. Chairman Mahfoud asked the City Manager and City Attorney if they had any comments, changes and/or deletions? Ms. Jenson stated she reviewed the policy and she had no comments. Mr. Genovese stated he reviewed the policy with Mr. Falconer and that he felt the policy looked fine. Board Member Moulin advised the Board and Staff that the major changes were the isolation of the $10 million and changing the maturities between two to five years, also included in the changes were limitations to bonds and notes. Chairman Mahfoud also stated that they wanted Staff to have more flexibility to work with. Board Member Osborne advised the Board that on page 10, second paragraph, eighth sentence, the following word should be crossed out: million the projected annual dollar amount, as detailed Section NX V, may be Chairman Mahfoud stated to the Board that they should review the final changes to the Investment Policy. The Board read through all the final changes of the Investment Policy. Board Member Moulin advised the Board that on page 7, Section V, Maximum Maturities, first paragraph, that the following word should be replaced: It is the policy of the City of La Quinta to hold securities and other investments in of In response to Chairman Mahfoud, Mr. Falconer advised the Board that the added bullet point on page 16 of the Investment Policy was the result of a request from Board Member Moulin. The bullet point resulted from the page added to the Treasurer's Report, comparing historical percentages and average maturity to the portfolio. Mr. Falconer informed the Board that on June 1 yth the 2002 RDA Project Area 1 closing will take place and new accounts will be created. Mr. Falconer requested that this account be added to the (i).73 Investment Advisory Board Minutes June 12, 2002 2002/03 Investment Policy on page 24, listed under item 6. In response to Board Member Osborne, Mr. Falconer informed the Board that the Auditors reviewed page 23 and discussed the issue of internal controls and there were no changes and/or comments in the area of cash. Mr. Falconer also informed the Board, that wiring changes arose after the September 11 th incident, the Council met and suggested that changes be made and the City went from a "dial -up" program with Wells Fargo for transmitting wires, along with cash transactions into an internet based program. Board Member Osborne asked how the internal controls were drafted to make transfers over the Internet? Mr. Falconer replied that the internal controls were written based upon the software requirements. Mr. Falconer advised the Board that a member of the Investment Board may want to be present at the Council Meeting for the approval of the 2002/03 Investment Policy to address any questions. The Meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, at 3:00 p.m. Chairman Mahfoud and Board Member Osborne stated that they would be in attendance. In response to Board Member Moulin, Mr. Falconer advised the Board that the City Council will also be conducting interviews for a new Investment Board Member at the Council meeting on June 18`h and that Mr. Mortenson, who is currently present, is one of the potential candidates. Motion - It was moved by Board Member Moulin/Osborne to finalize the Fiscal Year 2002/03 Investment Policy. Motion carried unanimously. VI CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL A. Month End Cash Report - May 2002 General discussion ensued in reference to the current and future economy. Mr. Falconer advised the Board that the City of Palm Desert has been actively working to sponsor legislation to write into law that the monies in the local areas investment fund are specifically designated 4 ?74 Investment Advisory Board Minutes June 12, 2002 as funds for the investors in the pool and they would not be subject to the State coming in and tying up the monies in the event of a State budget crisis. Mr. Falconer also advised the Board that the City sent a letter of support and the issue is being tracked by a person on staff who tracks legislation. In response to Chairman Mahfoud, Mr. Falconer advised the Board that he had met with a representative, who was a consultant for Bond Logistics, and she informed Mr. Falconer that the court had ruled on the LAIF subject matter and had ruled in our favor. Mr. Falconer will follow-up by requesting a letter from LAIF. Mr. Falconer advised the Board that this matter pertained to the Howard/Jarvis Group. Back in 1997 the group asked a Superior Judge in Los Angeles to freeze LAIF, which meant that nine to ten cities had put in requests for withdrawal of funds and were not able to access their funds. The State requested an injunction and it was granted, therefore releasing the funds. This matter was ruled in the State's favor, releasing the funds and not freezing them. Mr. Falconer advised the Board that with this ruling and the proposed law by the City of Palm Desert will be a real plus for all cities. Noted and Filed B. Pooled Money Investment Board Reports — April 2002 In response to Board Member Osborne about the upcoming LAIF Conference, Mr. Falconer advised the Board if the proposed budget is approved by Council, that at the July Investment Advisory Board meeting a recommendation can be made for two Investment Advisory Board Members to attend the September LAIF Conference in Sacramento. Noted and Filed VII BOARD MEMBER ITEMS Board Member Moulin advised the Board that he was considering stepping down from the Board, but decided to remain on the Board but at a lesser capacity. 5 17r Investment Advisory Board Minutes Vill ADJOURNMENT June 12, 2002 MOTION - It was moved by Board Members Moulin/Osborne to adjourn the meeting at 6:05 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Submitted by, John M. Falcon r Secretary 0 rI' r, DEPARTMENT REPORT: TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager DATE: July 16, 2002 SUBJECT: Department Report — Response to Public Comments The following public comments were made at the July 2, 2002, City Council meeting: 1. Mr. Bill Pierce, 78-600 Cabrillo Way, expressed concern that the "living fence" at Rancho La Quinta does not meet Code requirements. He suggested installing vinyl inserts and temporary noise barriers to combat the traffic noise from Washington Street until the "living fence" matures enough to reduce noise levels. The matter was referred to staff. Staff will research and report back to the City Council. 2. Mr. Rupert Yessayian, P. 0. Box 251, spoke regarding the proposed location of an elementary school at Calle Tampico and Eisenhower Drive. He believes placement of a school at this location would have an adverse effect on the Village plan. He understood from the School District that the City has reviewed and supports the school plan design. The matter was referred to staff. Staff will research and report back to the City Council. 3. Mr. Charlie Coulter, 49-1 1 1 Washington Street, referenced the letter under Written Correspondence from The Villas of La Quinta to extend the Montero Estates sound wall to Eisenhower Drive. The matter was referred to staff. Staff will research and report back to the City Council. 4. Autumn Brady, 701 N. Brand Boulevard, Suite 550, Glendale, spoke regarding the Miraflores Senior Apartment project and the concerns of residents that there will not be a wall and separate entrance for the apartments. Staff is preparing a letter in response to Ms. Brady's concerns. 5. Lynda Hayes, 79-651 Cassia, stated she is opposed to the entrance/exit planned for the senior apartments. Staff is preparing a letter in response to Ms. Hayes' concerns. 278 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 3- A AUGUST 6 AUGUST 20 SEPTEMBER 3 SEPTEMBER 17 OCTOBER 1 OCTOBER 15 NOVEMBER 5 NOVEMBER 19 DECEMBER 3 DECEMBER 17 CITY COUNCIL'S UPCOMING EVENTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING - CANCELLED CITY COUNCIL MEETING - CANCELLED CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL MEETING p" () July 2002 La Quinta City Council Monthly Planner Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesd ay- Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 --- 3 4 5 6 2:00 PM City Council Meeting 10:00 AM ALRC Special Holiday (City Hall Closed) Independence Day (City Hall Closed) 7' 8 9 10 11 12 13 12:00 PM Transp. 7:00 PM C.V. 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM Energy/ -Perkins Mosquito Abate. Pena Envi-Sniff 6:00 PM League -Perkins 5:30 PM Invest- 7:00 PM Cultural of Cities-Riv.Div. 7:00 PM Planning ment Advisory Arts Commission 7:00 PM Commu- Commission Board nity Services Meeting Commission 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 10:00 AM Public 9:00 AM CVB- 3:00 PM Historic Safety -Perkins Henderson Preservation 2:00 PM City Commission Council Meeting 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 7:00 PM Planning 4:00 PM DRRA 9:00 AM LAFCO- Commission Airp-Henderson Henderson Meeting 28 29 30 31 6:00 PM CVAG- Exec Com-Pena 12:00 PM CVAG- Human/Comm.- June August Adolph S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 1 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 8 19 20 21 22 23 24 30 Li 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 7/11/2002 Z I August 2002 La Quints City Council Monthly Planner Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday July September S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 28 29 30 31 29 30 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2:00 PM City 10:00 AM ALRC 12:00 PM Energy/ Council Meeting Envi-Sniff 7:00 PM Cultural Arts Commission 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V. 9:00 AM RCTC- 3:00 PM Historic Safety -Perkins Mosquito Abate. Pena Preservation 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins 5:30 PM Invest- Commission -Perkins 7:00 PM Planning ment Advisory 6:00 PM League Commission Board of Cities-Riv.Div. Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 9:00 AM CVB- 9:00 AM LAFCO- Henderson Henderson 2:00 PM City Council Meeting - CANCELLED 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 6:00 PM CVAG- 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM CVAG Exec Com-Pena Commission Human/Comm- Meeting Adolph 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 7/11/2002 -) R 1 September 2002 La Quinta City Council Monthly Planner Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 An 2:00 PM City 10:00 AM ALRC 12:00 PM Mayors Council Meeting Lunch CANCELLED Labor Day (City Hall Closed) 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 10:00 AM Public 7:00 PM C.V. 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM Energy/ Safety -Perkins Mosquito Abate. Pena Envi-Sniff 12:00 PM Transp. -Perkins 5:30 PM Invest- 7:00 PM Cultural -Perkins 7:00 PM Planning ment Advisory Arts Commission 6:00 PM League Commission Board of Cities-Riv.Div. Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission Patriot Day 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 9:00 AM CVB- 3:00 PM Historic Henderson Preservation 2:00 PM City Commission Council Meeting 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7:00 PM Planning 12:00 PM CVAG 9:00 AM LAFCO- p1* Commission Human/Comm- Henderson 1 st Day of Meeting Adolph 4:00 PM DRRA Autumn Airp-Henderson 29 30 6:00 PM CVAG - Exec Com-Pena August October S M T W T F S S M T W T F S - 1 _2 _3 1 2 34 5 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 27 28 29 30 31 Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 7/1 1/2002 9 %.3 r-� DEPARTMENT REPORT: T4ht �W MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tom Hartung, Director of Building & Safety -1-9 DATE: July 16, 2002 RE: Monthly Department Report - June 2002 Attached please find the statistical summaries for building permits, Animal Control, Code Compliance, and business licenses for the month of June. The reports depict the following highlights: • Year to date building permit valuation is $88,979,450.14 which represents an issuance of 1,636 building permits through June; • 1,317 animal control cases have been handled through June; • 1,448 code compliance cases have been initiated through June; • 8 new licenses were issued to La Quinta based businesses in June; • $1,440.00 - garage sale permit income in June; • $220.00 - Senior Center income in June: New Life Community Church $ 220.00 281 N N C) (D C:) C) C) C) C:) C:) C)O C) C)M C)O O W N O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O — Q CD C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) CD C) N CD CDM (O Q Cr0 64 a0 fA EA tf) tf3 69 fA fR EA fR bq 69 bq fA O � } v bq d r- N Ci U_ t u9 J N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl) LAD m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O to O m L(I O Cj Cj C) Cj Cj O C) C7 O O O O O O 6 ui d 1- r- 69 64 64 64 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 64 69 N CD Z ? co 0 64 Q' a '7 O O Lo O Lo O O (D O 'D r- "T M r- (D N O O U7 N V M (f) M O t.() O (D tf) m Lt) V O r� O co O r- rl- 00 O O O O M r- M 00 M (D (f) Q O (9 N to co Cl) O M r- r- (C) — N (D L0 Lr) V N } 00 N M V Co -IT (D V Cl) 69 co r- (D N � 00 (D N O N M O c- r- O 00_ O (-- O O Vi O M N 69 69 69 ITel, EA r- 69 Cl) W 69 Efl 69 69 N 69 69 69 O N w LL 69 64 M O 00 Cl) O O O O 00 O O r 00 O O co O Q) O (D N (D (n O O 00 O O '1t O (D N 0) rl� Q' = �? IT O CD (D O O O r (D U") O V LC) O Cl) (D U) N uJ H 69 O 00 (` ct N O V 64 (n co r- 0) t 69 O V (f) U7 M M 64 co O N Cl) tt 00 a) e- d Z r- 69 C. 69 G') 69 Ni (A 69 Efl cM rA O CA 69 N 64 69 69 M � 69 N Ef-T 64 (f) O f- O CD CD CDC- C) CD C:) CD CD CD CD C)U) co O N co O O O O O (D O O U-) N V O cD (D O (D (D Cl) N O O M O O 00 Cl) M r m 69 M (n 00 M O (A O O O 0) 64 N O O Q O U, O N M N M O (\_ tf) 07 O 'V M V' H Lo O O N Lo (D N r- co CD CO M t0 N } f� N Lo M to (A N r" C 4 N 't M et r- J O O 00 69 69 (D U4 t` M 69 O N V N (� M N (V 69 69 6q EA 69 69 U!) O a z z (n O Z~ ~ O O 'IT L0 O O O O U")O O O O O O O O le D CD O r tt O V O r- O O (-DO N N O J co � r- O Or 00 O 00 O O f— co N V O Lr) M (0C)i CD CD l� J N > Q N O 00 N O O O M � ('M V' O O n-q W Z} (D O r- N 'It O N (f') M N rn r- C- (n (D O r- O 0 Z (D O (D N t!) Cl) N N Cl) N 0)64 64 v N Cl)- LC) M O — M r (V U) 00 (R r� O n a)} w = O � (s 69 i» (fl 69 (» (f, C n 1- cYi �i (fl (ri O U (» (» 69 flq (»co U Z � 69 O O O (n O O o O O O O O O O O O O u) U) t` O O Cl? O O O O O O O rn r O O O mLc) Q Z N O O 00 O O O O O O O N Cl) O O O r- li (� O U (n v EA O O to (D (C) (� 00 M 69 (D O 00 Cn 69 (f) O V' 00 CO 69 O O M M 00 CA (r f Z N O M (n IT 'ct N Cl) N n O O O O (D IT (R N O Efl (D L0 � N h 0 V C El-T N 64 69 69 64 64 69 N 6 N 6A 69 69 O O O to O (17 (D (t) 00 LC) M C) V V M co (D r N V } J 0) O N (D r (Dr'- (D M 0 O O r- O r- t0 CD N (V O V O N 'IT M M Cl) Cl) CD Q � F- p z W J Q Z = U Z �= j j O O O N O F- N O 0 Cl)cM r- O N �U) N N O N �H >> P- r >F co �2 F- 0 W Q�N O HD Q W Z } o D < a ~ } Z O J J Z O w U J J Lu M Q U `_' U a O Q O W ti Q U a Z Z � H w li Z Z a Ow LLJm J O w J J U Q m 2 J w _O a J U O Q a J _� w U D OU lowi U) I- w Z (n (n }? > O Z) O w J O a Q O w w p f- (n U m U w a a 0- c7 U ry Iryl 1H ANIMAL CONTROL REPORT FOR: JUNE, 2002 Steve Alexander, Jackie Misuraca and Moises Rodarte ANIMAL PICKUPS YEAR TO YEAR TO INCIDENTS YEAR TO YEAR TO DATE 02 DATE 01 HANDLED DATE 02 DATE 01 Dogs Alive 29 187 224 Bite Reports 4 23 19 Dead 6 34 29 Animal Trap OTI 0 7 21 Set Ups 2 35 43 Cats Alive 17 126 90 Cruelty to Dead 8 41 35 Animals 0 2 7 OTI 1 1 0 Other Animals Alive 18 74 64 Vicious Animal Dead 2 46 48 Restraining 0 2 0 TOTAL ANIMALS Alive 64 387 378 Dead 16 121 112 OTI 1 8 21 TOTAL ANIMALS REMOVED 81 516 511 VIOLATIONS: Dogs at Large Noise Disturbance Defecation removal License Violation Other Monthly Total YEAR TO DATE No Owner 21 0 0 0 0 21 Warnings 0 0 0 0 0 0 Special Hour Patrols 1 Zoning Violations 0 Lost & Found 42 Animal Rescue 3 Outside Agency 0 City Reclaims 4 Other 17 TOTALS 73 Citations 12 1 0 18 0 31 104 9 217 14 54 6 14 202 211 8 6 0 0 62 60 117 95 471 509 TOTAL MONTHLY INCIDENTS HANDLED: JUNE 02- 206 / JUNE 01- 236 YEAR TO DATE INCIDENTS HANDLED: JUNE 02 - 1.317 / JUNE 01 -1,597 C-3 CODE COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR: June, 2002 June 02 YEAR TO DATE 02 YEAR TO DATE Ol ABATEMENTS Nuisance Abatements Started 254 901 845 Weed Abatements Started 21 85 69 Vehicle Abatements Started 76 445 630 Dwelling Abatements Started 3 17 5 TOTAL STARTED 354 1,448 1,549 TOTAL COMPLETED 243 1,279 1,142 CaseFollow-Ups 374 1797 2.124 Home Occu a� tion Inspections 16 56 53 Business License Inspections 0 0 13 Garage sale permits Issued 144 778 772 N N N N N N N N 00000000 000000000 N N N N N N N N -0 LO M C') V CC) N CO Cfl 0 N 7 O 7 N z: N O B00000000 C7 z H LU p Z O > O OZ W U uj w� Z aU)w Xw >> U w Of _z=¢106 n�IxW �LLI Qln mZ0 } W Y Z W V U UOfW OZH> cowQ -uIxw i w D a J Z Z U W d) III -0M2 lQ.w=�c=n0 I- > 2OU>wz0a To 88- 00700000 m oM fl- l- eO a O CN O N1� O T N t CM CO N n I,- CO f� r- aR aar— CO m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 'N 0 LO 0 CM M 0 0 LO LO 0 M M CM M N N N N N N N N NNNNNNNN Q m m O O O O O m d R .IQ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q HHHf-HHHH T Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ _ ZZ_ M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a'gggggggg w � U O I- w N Cn ~ LO w cr U N m Z 00 Q 00 W W QOQwQwQ<n _ -j Z J Do DZ 2 w m J w J w Q C7 0 Q� 2 0 0 0 Q Q oU')00 oo �MOm m"tLO Ir O V LO M_ t` t17 rl- � r- r- LO h to V' U w CD Z i ~z HQwO w OfU 0 � D w O w x w m JN E ►-JUZOU C CN 00L >J006 W Z �a) = YUogJfrw 0JM sly<-a<y< w J o mmmUUU2-,Cn n^� O Cw C It LO COf�LON0)OMO /'SJ1 I O m OO m 0 O CO O V M M CM V V It M tV (�m2 BOOOOOOOO DEPARTMENT REPORT: Lo'd c&t,, 4 QUM& CF OF TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: JERRY HERMAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: JULY 16 , 2002 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE, 2002 Attached please find a copy of the Community Development Report which outlines the current cases processed by staff for the month of June. PAMonthly Department Report.wpd I N O n � c cCD CD�' M c 3 r+ D (n CD cn 3 CD :3 cn p cc o m 3 CD 3 cn w CD 3 cn —i K cn 0 m D U) 3 CD cn K D c' r+ 3 � v c�D CD N 0 -°a 3 m ? cc CD CD 3 m n cnm c c 0 o v M O C— m n O O O -ph. O N O O O O O O En (n cn cn U) (n cn (1) (n w cn cn c c c c c c c c c c c c c a Q' a is u 6 cr u u u u u a 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD a- CL CL CL CL CL CL n a CL n. CL a- v m cn m O z n O z v m -v L D z m rrn N z O o �o ry m M n c z v m m r M m z m T D m z W (1J Cf) cn 7--vp C� CO (.0 N CD O O h W 0 O N o D w -' n cn --I O -0-1 3 W CDC-O O W N cn W � 0 N CD W p �o CD M <rn D� 3 Q- O Q- N (D W m W = N \ W C) m 0 x CD -4 aD r+o m*t C r+ cA "D � N -V 0 0 0 a N c� r+. Cn N rn a o 00 7.N v W cn 0) r+ a)c= X O 0) CD < r -I -1 W 0 4�1,O 00 v N G) 0-0 0 D Np 00 0 v X N no w 0 ZO '� p O -v m D cn 0 rr D v cn r+ D < CD 0 0 CD D I+ 0) O p<° N O m 3 m C �_ O N CD fl1 CD (D O O f> C cn c 1+ o c Q r+ c o� ,+ c "a c { CD 7 Q 7 c0 W !:t O r CD cn 0 Q (D N c M M O ~' a)' '�* CD N rn -�+ O 7 o N+ O O rNr O w n rt 7 �, (D m r+ CD r+ c 0 O r+ o �' to W cu � O° 1 O O 6 0 �' r r (D CQ r+ =3 w ,+ (D cn =) Q a Q- v CD CD ° v o '+ CD c (D D CD -a �. O O �' < -i O °- cn Q O O Q c CD O -a 0 O fl+ N O (D O L v o' 3 O 0 v + <' cn . O < G� n K '< 3 I+ v) Q m �* m (D 7 N O CO N C nri 77 (D O o O r+ N,+ W O O cD O CD 0 cn (D CD Cn 3 O cn cn '{ r v 0 < 0 O � 0) * O, CD v �� 07r+ o p30 D� (D (D r+ CD � v (D O 3W< Cl CD(D v ° ° CD CD cn an c CD O Q c W � cr °) o O CD o Cr '� m C) n W O Q p O Cn 7 CD cn cn O _ <' cn o 00 W o O CD " 0) o U) O CD 1+o O rn 3 - m o Dr+ � n 0 O a:) 03 cn CD I+ o + CD CD mC< r-n o n 0 «m3 3� c p c J Vrna*) O 3 CD cD3r+° cn (D C N O �. T CD W cn CD cn Q cn ,< r0r (n 3 Q Co r3+ (� -u D C) C) -0 C) -u D C) -0 2 0) C) C) -0 O C) C) r C) C) C) C) C) C) r C) C) -a C) C) C) �p C) CO =r �--.. �jrn o��m o_ ��Cn Nj N� pov� N�c; N Q- co��W Co OCflN 00 0�� NN)O Q� NO p� N0 0 O N NJ N C)00"a -p , O O 70 D D D D D� -a D O < a -O _0 � -0 -O -a o� 7 c CD Q� <<-a� CD < o ° o < < o CD n. r+ a 0 < a Q CD a CD a cD CL Q< CDO ,{ O �9n n �w p CD L p C) o cv 2v o Cn tom a D O N a P = o W p J W 0Nm c o0 D CNN ° O cn O N DCn� in Ow o °. N -0cc ai ON N , O Cj ON n O O (b N n cnNm m oO D sv NN = O 3 0 Na cn � v G� D N O p N O �p Cn N n n�Nm :_ O 0 _roof- ° ° op D NN O O cn N N �� -- (n D C O rj O N o W N W n C � =CnNm °� 00 D r+ N) N) O O 7 N 0 — �; o (n o 0 rQ -v O (D O cn N CD W N v O n C � O �On-0o�� rn� Dc° c C)m 2O v cn r+ CD CD GCDN'*Q °�00CCDCD 00 CD * D ° CD c O ° c 7 N o N m< Cr+D °- O N 3 m N r v w N x 0 p CD CAD c v cn c O -+, cn O CD a n r* N j cn N -p O r+ ° a 7 0 (D 0 0) 0 CCDD r O O O°° CD O O O '* CD O O Wo rr+ C >< 0 CL CD 0 � CD ��D o ° o CD CD D v O CD �p� . D CD �, o O ro CD 0 W •G 'O rN+ a n < CD a a CD r+ tv N Cn rN+ O ram+ 0 O n CD CD _ 0) CD O cn a j n m C) a- N O O O cn n -a 7 �n 3 o �+ O rF n O N ,G ,O+ CD -a o 0 W D cn r+ 3 O CD CO T w� N � CQ 0) O O N 7 7 CD o W 7 O o (D 7 a 0 CD O n O n 0 -, 0 O � W N CD c D 0 CD = ,O� r+ c 3 r N CQ 00 3 W CD CD o ai (D D CD ? cn = r+ v v cn K CD rn+ Cn � ? Cv m ° O in •G N cn 7 CD -0 7c O O v j CD o r 0x ° N �' cc a �' a a co sv o ° o sv c o tv °+ Gi CL tv CD N O O 3 a O --h O p ° -< cr x 3 O W a cc c" O COn O 0 v U o. o CL m c C° °—' O-0 °9 CD 0 CD m o o 1 cn �• 0 ° O n O •G .G ( A � �i r+ r+ CD 0) 2 O Do �. [n CD fli 'O 0) W � tv � . (D EL r+ r+ %fl cn o CD al r+ CD CD O ° ° n m C > -o CL CD r+ Cn Cn r+ CD O ° cn r CU � CD W 00 -- r o r+ CD r+ o CD p� O p 3 CD N G CD CO o CL ° O �o r+� o -h m c tea? Cb o ^r+ c: � ° � BCD p r+ 3 o 0 D 0 m m h CD a O o r+ w 3 �v oCD a o 0- CD Cu =r cn r+ r+ -J CD x -0D n_0 n-v 0m n -aD ° n-aD nr nn nn nn nnr co nnr CD �In rnLn 0)Ul 0)Cn ��n CD �(n .. N N co W V (� CO CO p�W W CD CD r+ spw O O O N O O O NNO O ' D O N N O N D D � 1 N CD a N -o -0 -a -a D -a D m D a D o a O m < O O o o �• a° ° a a a < v CD a N CD a b O y n y O CA U) o ou �NJ:r Cl) n o — 0 �N CD cn n n a� O CA CD<pNv=' CD Cn � n O O w O • O -0 Cl) < p � nvo D W 0 CD 0 Cn v cn < p oDp CNCD D n = CD Cn o cn 0 n O o CD 3 �0 < -0 NO o p v ' o D 3 CL � �0 Nm 3 CD a)CD v W 00 O W0 01� 00C AN 0 cn CD* 0 CD G cn E p cn E p cn ED m --ac� r �' CO p D 0 0 CD 3 o + c ° CL c '+ CD o a c '+ o CD m e CL� o 3 °< m o c o- ° 3 CL (D a CD O CD CL CC -0 CC W - v O 3 CL '� < CU <' < W Cv < _ Cn O 3 N CD W Cy rr C1 _ • N < cn CCD D o v i N cn �� o o< cn � � 4 o 3° r+ _ n m° o' a v 3 rn O �. cm D v �' � o< u cn r+ G) 'G <� O c� o ° o� o cn -,, p cn -* C o' v D CD o CD CD 3 y 1+-0 o' o v o' ° v o° O v O COn Ln N 3 -a O Lnn cn m � O 0 CD cn X n + CD CD < < a CD O 0CD C < _ 0 CD -O N O ,<C-=O O cnN CD 0- OQ cn 0 r+ cn CD CD C Q Oin r-h ° O 0) cn Cll CD O CCD - c 7 + O n CD �' N C) =►; Cn N n 1; � Q O 3 w =- CD ° O 0 C n v O cn n O O 0 cn�, p �. 00 ° Q CL CT CD 1+ O n O a O '< cn C° O o -< � 3 CD cn r r <' CD V 7 Cn 7 cn r C CD -1 CD -4, CD cn n o �, 3 CD N cn. cn. �, CD v� a w 3 CD h M C 0 O 3 O -. ,� O CLCQ O' CD O CD O a a O CD CD rn a CD cn (� mCD cn (� mCD c_n ° 0 N' a cn -a O cr3 O CD � 0 cn r+ nOi CD < -'' n cn n cn 7 CD < CD o 3 ,{ p a v' CD cn O CD CD CD D S V� = V� cn Q — O �'< - _ 0cn ° ° o c CT 3 CD =3 7' cCL 5. CD D n m 3' CD CD CD =r:3 CD =ra ° cn CD :3 CD 7- cn. c cn o 1+ c r CD v c r- CD w :3 Cn 0- 0- C.0 cn ° CD to :3 CL � CD -v a 0 -0 0 D n -aa -aa n n n < � 0 0. o °) cn m a cn 0. CD r r N Cn N 00 a c0 (.0 N� Ln cn p' c O O O 3 C� CD O O N 0 c O O O N NJ IQO r+ 3 N N '{ D D D c -< 3 a a a CD° a CL °� ° 0 CD o ° < < ° 3 CD CL CD a CD a a 3 CD CD Y y O 2917) m cn 3 o ._+ N -i V v W 3 cn D o O O N Q 2 o T m� 0) -i w o N K w O O W COD m m Cl) rn Cn CD O w m N r p CCD CD -4' CD N O O C (DCD o < O c � N CD (n W O N N D 0- :tt r p cn DD� p N °° 1 o N O N O N O n N O w p N cn _0 �! ? p m p 0 �=g-j �� o D N O c,W L N O cn O cn 0 O cn m 0 m CD Do D cn D C) D w -0 0 O n. a) '+' CD CD -0 m a CD -Q < CD CD 0 -a -o CD CL CL m O o cn -a 0 CT1 c� CD < �-U Q- c D c CD c Q- 7 c CD O c O Q - ° CD cp W O cn 0 .. CD 0 C) C1 7< vOi r+ a cOn r* r+ r+ rn v ::3 O Ul m° 3 3 Q -+ 0 0 0 v r+ o cn Oa o o r+ r CD r+ cn�0 O r+ X-m c CD N ff+ a- rn < p m e CD �' w p m O v� v< '� n �' ,O+ n I+ o Q- p N' a CD � v N 0 G) �* o — N r �, 7 CD � CD 5' D O 3 a- v p a, v a CD N �' o O v � m con o* m c 00 O C1 CD CD C- CD X ' ' N -, (D N C* N O • CD cn O 3 �' cn �' U, 0 a -� CD a m w 000 0 �' m cn 3 0 co cn s O r+ O CD cn cn O Q 3' '-1 CL N -a -a — Cl) 3 CD n � r+ O -• D m cn 0 O a cc 0 3 v 0 °' a CD in' v cc ; + CD O c fl- (n O �, cn r+ Q r+ cD 3 0 0) 0- o- ,+ C 0 CD 0 a � N � 3 N 'a � o' m 3 CD 0 0 Cn 0 CD n� CD r+ 3 v O n o �+ o o m p �. 0 3 °' CD 0 a cn rn cn � in 0 c� 3 -0 0 0 0 o p CD 0 O N m p� a cc 0�' ' c c a0 :3NQ7? O-O0 0 CD O 0 CD (D N Cr OW cn 0) c �N- {. C 0 c rr CD O 0 sv O C L n c 0 0 a 7 0 CD Q m I F 3 (n ) CD CD O CD .+ 0 0 �. o CD w o Q ZS 0 � O• 0 0) :3 O � � � C cn CL C.0\ cn O O � v Q :3 co O O r* Er CD tl N i O 7r w �D Dp Dp -a nD nn c»D C» n r �' rnn O, < 0 O o < n r+ O m 0 9 cn ,I n CO J COCD V -� CD N-; N N h O 0) rQ N V � CA N C31 0- Cn 0- cn Ln p' :3 Ul O N ON W W O W o O O v CD O O 0 0 N N N O N N 1.-1 _0 O cQ O cc O 0 C) a) N N N to M ON O N , b y n z fj n 1� Cf)D O N 6) X- (7 O :3 G -P.tOn 3 m rCD xr 0 cn O Z O �—�ID O O ON Ln r+ cn0) CD O < CDC _0 3 CD �� C) O — N Cn 0 < �• a—�ID O o moNJ O N '+ G) D c(n ON W �I v D ON cn CD cn (n 3 0 O N O cnCD CTI Cb CO �o o (n r co M p D u> r- G) o cn D CD C C CD w D C _0 0 V 0 0 CD C a r a O C c CD a c CD o C O (D CD CD r Cn CD < CD CD w CU O r+ (n 0 " r�F O 0 CD r+ a -:3 cn r+ 0 '-t n Q O N -O O o ° CD O 0 a CD +' iv n O c_n 3 c O co cn r+ -� < 0 :3 cc CD m w � ::g a o N 3 cD 3 N T 00 nLn 0 cn CD CD 0 O M r+ U) CD CA v CD cn CD O O a 3 0 G_ C I O CD O CD v a 7 Cn rh CD O C 0)�' 3 CD Cv CD 1 V O c :3 0+ CD CU w O N rr _n CD CO00 CD � r+ O 0- _Q v_0 � v ? 3 0 0 o a 3 c � O �• O O CD -A o -� -* r h O- cn C Z < CD CD O < CQ 0 CD O X O CD L cc CD w cr CD < CQ CD O CDO r+ 0 -Or, r0r CS1 Cn 0 (D cn0 IQ1+ 00 ° 0 p 0 ccnn O 00 00 O S CD 0 :30 r r ► . c -, 1 CD CD CD O ° p_ 3 30 �0) cn � �°" sv 3 CD 0 0 CD 0 0 n CD W0 m� m� —� r+D 3 �3 3 n' c cn N sll 0 � m 0, 3 c a CD 0 p � 0 cn 0 CD n cm � 3 CA)p CD cn 0. � 3 -o c 0 3 rn 0 c� �. 0 CD 0 a 0 0 :3 a) �< '+ r Cv O o r+ r+ 0 0 0 CD a x n nn nD nn nn O p N N O N N (A)O (Jl LTI 00 0 ON ON ON ON O O O O N N N 0 N v 3 , sv �0 a o o, o < 0 CD (D CCDD < < CD CD < a CD a a0 a a a O y 294 W 00 c = 7 N C '� Q 0 d N n N N r � 3 O CAm '+� Z O o n n n m 7 Q = 3 Orm* y cc p CD N � S �D 'O fD m �* w CD a. a. 9' o, fa d 7 CD cc cfl 7 CD CD � 0 <D C. o U Z m N CD of = Cc w C 1 O '* C d c N a. a CL °o p cc cD v CD 1 c m O a d a. 3 .* CD m o' oCD s' o -, CD D O '* a C v CD d 0 y W CD N D O .* 00 -+ W N CA)3 y 7 O •* O O 7 CD + O (Jl O O DTI 0 �D 4 (O -AO o n O O o o co � w 03 �001� CD co 4�b Cl) N '' N O CD-� O O o� n + S N O N N cfl a c_ n coal c °� w 3 v w — c g CD 0 N 0 0 O N N N W m n D r 0 m 0 cn D C w m M O --I ?_9 M.- DEPARTMENT REPORT: es' 45 OF T TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COU CIL FROM: DODIE HORVITZ, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTO DATE: JULY 16, 2002 SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 2002 UPCOMING EVENTS OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST 2002: Aug 1 Shop Fashion Island in Newport Beach, Excursion Aug 2 *Free Energy Assistance Aug 3 La Quinta Summer Tour, Desert Willow Golf Resort Aug 4 Angels Baseball Game at Anaheim Stadium Aug 5 *Monthly Putting Contest Aug 6 *Free Blood Pressure Screening Aug 6 Hatha Yoga, Senior Center Aug 8 *Healthy Cooking Class Aug 10 La Quinta Summer Golf Tour, Cimarron Golf Club Aug 10 Sea World in San Diego, Excursion Aug 13 Interesting & Easy Summer Salads, Senior Center Aug 13 *Spinal Health Care Seminar Aug 14 Guitar Classes, Senior Center Aug 15 *Free Medicare and Insurance Counseling Aug 15 Hors D'oeuvres Cooking Classes, Senior Center Aug 16 *Free HI -CAP Counseling Aug 17 La Quinta Summer Golf Tour, Marriott's Shadow Ridge Aug 17 Summer Art Blast Classes, Senior Center Aug 20 *Free Hearing Consultations Aug 22 *"Back to School" Program and Luncheon Aug 22 Tiny Tots Jamboree Classes, La Quinta High School Aug 24 Mastering Microsoft Word, Computer Seminar Aug 24 La Quinta Summer Golf Tour, Westin Mission Hills, Gary Player Course Aug 27 *Free Cholesterol, Glucose and Blood Pressure Screenings Aug 29 *Tea Dance Aug 31 La Quinta Summer Golf Tour, Desert Willow Golf Resort ry *Daytime Senior Center class or activity T-iht 4 4a" Community Services Department Attendance Report for the Month of June 2002 Summary Sheet Program 2002 2001 Variance Sessions Per Month 2002 2001 Leisure Classes 206 126 109 20 12 Special Events 388 188 200 15 4 Adult Sports 836 554 282 24 10 Senior Center 1232 1316 -84 89 81 Total 2662 2184 507 148 107 Senior Services Senior Center 488 522 -34 13 11 Total 488 522 -34 13 11 Sports Complex Use LQ Sports & Youth 1,250 900 350 12 8 Total 1,250 900 350 12 8 Total Programs 4,360 3,606 823 1731 126 Volunteer Hours Senior Center 5031 735 -232 Total Volunteer Hours 5031 735 -232 Monthly Revenue Senior Center $ 3,079.50 $ 2,967.50 $ 162.00 Community Services $ 8,678.00 $ 6,886.00 $ 1,792.00 Total Revenue $ 11,757.50 $ 9,853.50 $ 1,954.00 Revenue Year to Date Senior Center $ 81,319.50 $ 58,955.00 $ 22,364.50 Community Services $ 73,815.00 $ 63,608.00 $ 10,207.00 Total Revenue to Date $ 155,134.50 $ 122,563.00 $ 32,571.50 297 C) C-, 2 Community Services Program Report for June 2002 2002 2002 2001 2001 2002 2001 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Sessions Sessions Leisure Classes Beginning Computers 8 16 6 12 4 2 2 Hatha Yoga 16 64 12 24 40 4 2 Italian for Travelers 6 12 13 26 -1 2 2 Latin Classic Ballroom 9 18 13 26 8 2 2 Drawing 7 14 15 30 -16 2 2 Guitar Classes 20 40 0 0 40 2 0 Kids Fun Art 4 8 4 8 0 2 2 Summer Salads 3 6 0 0 6 2 0 Hors D'oeuvres, Cooking 14 28 0 0 28 2 0 Totals 87 206 63 126 109 20 12 2002 2002 2001 2001 2002 2001 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Sessions Sessions Special Events Summer Day Camp 18 180 0 0 180 10 0 Desert Willow Golf 48 48 0 0 48 1 0 Cimarron Resort Golf 50 50 56 56 -6 1 1 Landmark Resort Golf 36 36 64 64 -28 1 1 Mountain Vista Golf 48 48 60 60 -12 1 1 Disney CA Adventure 12 12 8 8 4 1 1 Getty Museum Trip 14 14 0 0 14 0 0 Totals 226 388 1881 1881 2001 151 4 2002 2002 2001 2001 2002 2001 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Sessions Sessions Adult Sports Open Gym Basketball 276 276 74 74 202 20 6 Adult Soccer League 140 560 120 480 80 4 4 Totals 1 416 836 194 554 282 24 10 Recreation Totals 1 7291 14301 451 8681 5911 591 26 Page 2 Senior Center Attendance 2002 2002 2001 2001 Registered Total Registered Total Meetings Participants Participation Participants Participation Variance 2002 2001 Senior Activities ACBL Bridge 142 142 108 108 34 4 4 Ballroom Dance, Complimentary 15 15 0 0 15 1 0 Bridge, Duplicate/Social 304 304 314 314 -10 14 13 Ice Cream Social 23 23 55 55 -32 3 6 Knitting Guild 8 8 0 0 8 1 0 Monthly Birthday Party 24 24 26 26 -2 1 1 Monthly Luncheon 55 55 78 78 -23 1 1 Movie Time 48 48 68 68 -20 8 10 Putting Contest 8 8 6 6 2 1 1 Seminars 13 13 0 0 13 1 0 Senior Activity Total 640 640 655 655 -15 35 36 Senior Leisure Courses Ballroom Dance 28 28 12 42 -14 3 5 Ceramics 13 36 11 38 -2 4 4 Computer 39 40 3 3 37 31 1 Cooking 8 8 16 16 -8 11 1 Dog Training Class 9 14 0 0 14 31 0 Exercise 40 341 50 430 -89 12 13 Senior Leisure Courses Total 137 467 92 529 -62 26 24 Senior Leisure Classes Arts and Crafts 24 24 0 0 24 4 0 Bridge Lessons 12 12 61 61 -49 21 4 Computer Tutor 1 1 2 2 -1 11 2 Quilting 27 27 31 31 -4 4 4 Rug Hooking 6 6 3 3 3 3 2 Tai Chi 5 5 16 16 -11 3 4 Woodcarving 13 13 19 19 -6 4 5 Yoga 37 37 0 0 37 7 0 Senior Leisure Classes Total 125 125 132 132 -7 28 21 TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAMS 902 1,232 879 1,316 -84 89 81 Senior Services A.A.R.P. "55 Alive" 36 36 48 48 -12 2 2 Ambassadors 35 35 59 59 -24 n/a n/a FIND Food Distribution 310 310 368 368 -58 41 5 Health Screenings HEAP Utility Program 11 11 6 6 5 2 1 57 57 0 0 57 2 0 I.I.D. Energy Assistance 27 27 16 16 11 n/a n/a I.I.D. Energy Assistance/No fee 5 5 1 1 4 n/a n/a Legal Consultation 1 1 15 15 -14 1 1 Medicare/Hi Cap Consultation 2 2 6 6 -4 n/a n/a Share Meetings/Sign-up 4 4 3 3 1 21 2 TOTAL SENIOR SERVICES 488 488 522 522 -34 13 11 SENIOR CENTER TOTAL 1,390 1,720 1 1,401 1 1,838 1 -118 102 92 Page 3 � DEPARTMENT REPORT. oq �o 5 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Roy F. Stephenson, P.E., Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: July 16, 2002 RE: Public Works/Engineering Department Report for the Month of June 2002 Attached please find the following: 1. Citizen Service Request Summary; 2. Encroachment Permit and Plan Check Services Summary; 3. Capital Improvement Plan Status Update; 4. Monthly Summary of Public Works Tasks. Roy F. Stephe on, P.E. Interim Public orks DirectorlCity Engineer 00 1— Z w H a w M to Y O J to a Fd `r d M N ti Cl) O H JO o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OW a O N p co d N w w o T J � a O U w 0 °0 aw DUm U. O� m Z M N co fl- >- U n¢ co o 0 0 v r ga O ni U �w WI-- OJI `_ `r M c" c�*i z0 O U G ww gW rt N N M �U Zw O 00O 0) N � 0 U cca 0 0 c O W Fw. _ c f2 (6 ca y O i U U N g L V «s Q to Q 0 t6 '� N Y C O U m t0 V VJ V! La 3 1... ��/� �Niyi7 YJ to � /t�6 CC� � G I- U C LO i-- 301 002 H z W a� zQ �a W a� jN LLY O0 O v� a d W U W J OOtnOOin o O O h LO O N {� o 0 o r-.: o ,Go. to ti co to =f (n to qd- r- 0) ;r w N N to W LL V3� Et} H3 Ef3 6a 41> J O ZOOWt0Otf) :D001`LLoON h- MtnO Qto LO d_ V- 0) r N N t0 {LjEREfi6-*ERt.d4T LL U) F. N V- t- Zi z Q w 01 0 WW !d>wz< 0-1 Q o2W�fl Wg�� W U W WE=pCtL�it J Q L U Ld CL:3F0Pa z O O o O 0 O 0 p 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 p0000to g to oo C)000 �COt.-CC a cj" N NM � O th � .- the W64 (a EA U) tf.* W, 69 40 69 #.q. LL J afl0o01o00000000 N 000000000000 N N N N N N N N N N N � N N a N N N N N N N N N U) N I- I- LL 0mm p-- m - �-- co 0000000o co - co co co i- WOoo a 0 fn J Q co AC zz HO I-- UQ�2O F-acn W D— a W J z U h a �Z5Q5gJ��0 dc�a0<Q<-j 00Qmzzd-C70a a0 , 0ul 0LAJ � 00�z wgU Ir =0)0a Z 0 Ot9 a o� t-UZoo� W p p� m a�ZU.0 0) p Q Q � W � W aZm00JCLWWM(ID 0 CO oc U-< z 0< W> U z z Z=)ZW a.>oJ a Q w 0 o�Q aQ(3 a.0CLLJ L Owp W Q ��?� �>QW-tL i- JF -U — U0z-U5JWzW W umzOQaW-j o W-fnwtw�Zoc�zI a.qUL cli LL 30?_ 003 w a IL M w M a F N N ram,. w N O. O . N 4.� .aj W V W U 2uj u O cc IL ..i a H a a U �.� C V >m c .aV� a +. n� C m CD �W n o 4. In w 7 0 -� ID -r 0 O 2 � = = n -o -moo ~ 4-0c3: -o .. O 0 o .Q O G) m m-a W F-m Z>a C > V �-= U! m p pip cOm.0 E L Y 0.9 .D v -- rm V m L cm t� lD o ID i p O O O a c .- O W W m O V co '� •►- � r o Y� G � 0p 0V t Q � 3aa o C.)oc UO V Z31_tao wmm rc maoa3pVE C9 0a0@a — Vp to mCo we C X CIA Ycm G1 4-140+ a r a E > c o c$=0a 'rn3mvE CC c CO 'moEm&w 4-0 C a 0 U oU Co a �� Q W CL - mL) 0 Em m o c co- Q o w ,O $ m p.o a m -rC n 0, ra o mdCLON Im� vo�3� roo wW2c0>M m �-� CL O O Y V` N -J V r V Q WO r m p 0 1- o m 3 vm- N -� o$ p O L- pD W aao j J (A 3 ~ ` O m Y a ca i+ CoIsi _a p y v U ��r= 45 O aj u E co O Co 0) >. a vc CoCNG 0U`5wNcUUa DU=a WU cC+4ac -0>' 0 a N N O CM O C O N W O O r o O o m N O m Go CD «p CD o CD W N co N O o "t �- W CD o o C7 0) Cl Vt N G N Go m m v} v W CLr mm W W U410 wp cnrn m 7 w mri C-O Q aD� oUC c Ern ODm cN --Q,rn a �+ 4r U O(D m m >- CO) m W4- 00 v Ea Ua` aa`a` 3 LL 0 w Q a 004 v O o- C ILL.m 41 o '_ r �' o. C O N O c Q Ito dp O C O aT O r O C O 'Z w CO O +' e— N t0 s - C > QO p O all th ca O �+ 'a '� O' tC W O = 5 O -0 E (7 U m a a�i m OI O O N C Goo~ N, a 'as a IDto 0 nQ .. :: m C a o o L J `J O +a NO tm CC cCL `oi m QA� vnr Et icc � ciIz Co ��E o «s o c a o o� 0 m� w N cw w p a �.:- a cCO CD o on- o mw m m >:m o 3� '� ava o O V �N wU Cma 0 tOJ Qo'a m oN 4' o o U`t o o Al ~ t OD 0 o� C c .• o C &a t o a U. O o o a p m to Q V �l cl! >� co +_. o c Co m v o w E la m p a 3s o m o G Co a. > +� v wm O c a N (Oj i N a �° m 'a ^ o to C C a O O C C -` m al • w C iO' t� i C 4a. tL w C G M 41 U) ONO v Qi .++ O 1- v a O , • C a=,, m. *' ad w m m m o p w e — 0 75 o n az =v s- • Qo E am U cy C w C U O O M r 0 w U �, w C Q rp 3 .0 G E m cL asp ` c C C` m ; C a O " to o o o � O Er- mF- Erb mU an O o 15 > C+. °� C CO) aD c ci C O O to w 0 U c U w s- � O 'v � L o .s ?� E' p O E M C W C s— u q a o m 1d N Qo 0 CO 4D o a a� m i aD .c O> a� c> w m Qa m=� L oti aLa 0 o; U t- $ c > i 4D i C 0 �. C� p 'a U O o al > c �o mm;, a ieiO n w m CDWs- m +m' U� 0 `O C C C m O C .` - N Q cQv r m C m m .e o C c iE 3: aal m aL ` a — m cc O a.• 0 C 'a N 5 ?m ` '� a• p ea p> L Q 8 vC O O m L '� N N 3 QO o •- 7 Z O O@ L p ad Z O E i 4 W o= 4 ~ o v v o c 'o o 0 m_ c'�a 4. �� Q 0 c0 0 Cm m i m o rn �Qa� rn4-0 � QA +L' m o Co t'O 'vrni c o° w C CN o CoU m o 5� o m oa o o o 00 m o C o o m o o aD o 0 moo'c4o C1UUt-ate [�U(azccc� o0�(0)cc oU� oU �t� ot� a3 r�va N 'C N NO p O O O O m to ao r• er t` N N O N 0 m O Q Lo Q i d w aa� �t O N r. C 0 .O O N O O O O ` O 0N 1 N NCD ^ N n rn a� 0 w rn 0 as 0 +� d O n ao n Ch CW)CV) n M N aD N uj M G al0 N O N t0 m r 40. 4 C - 41 O CD O ..0 40 Q C ap+ O C EL -0, a+m , wc 4- aw O m mmE24 > O LOEino O Ca m C)W o, C N— O m O .. O VaCD W °aN �Q CJ� �rn J tl �U m CDO �} — ++ C ar m C a+ 0 0 +j ca as a)O O O a. w m m O O � as OD 0 > .1 rn aSa` 2cna aN=O ��a` �cacoa U� acorn 30 (BUJ m C> m I�i � ON_ 7FU M cm CD a) Q O mCD eo h O as 0 W 00 V- O a+ .a ` CO OD m m o c� °' o O4-8 mN U `oGD m co eo a c m o cq t U rno -o0 c°1°m ono N w ID 41 OD C O U m 41 0 ra (O 3 aV OD O � C to (� d C - oil W U � Im W E 5 �t 'Id 0- "o 4D ; w to r• m as .0,gym, E eio m u u l -O 0 o m c n `o- m -o m V m C a� m V E C 3 m 0 +/1 a E 0 c ao 5 3 ? Cr +0 pf as o O •: •- ar, c Fn +, otc a o E cm r- r coca m pl 0 V c o Q a D c v=W0 C7 wm i cwEc°l ±'m� O 'm *' v c, C 3 Q t4 m L W U C O° aN 0 CD Q V U m C-p ticO +®+Cl) O M W O �F' i tjc �U tm amA CL E ° >U,B �WC �G t0 ID.E o O- T CC O ►Z MC � c ° CD '> 0 •> m O 0 3 aC O QD = O� � C C C c a opt. v0- .02 u0. aoi me �c a0+ E W00 c?� c0Q cEE� O E'E c�.o Lm I-m _O _a •all _� E 0 •� m to m tll C C QA C'j C m O m N, O Q tD 0 C +' m O C � ym, m 0 O +� m ap O pp ��n p.0 OVm arrl � m tm C]UCu C]UO O()Q OvU m .O V N d p N N O N 0 c O C m n 0 n 0 LO O O M E N i N N M th 'C 'O p c} O N O i0 j 0 n t ^ a G1 a�ID 00 L � O N O O N 'O N N N O N O N 0 C m¢ N 0 aD m C m ODN 0 N O O tO O O Q f� E -0 E , , ' Z ? O YO m m ��, aD m e- 0 N O O �- O N O 0 0 d ch -c OD O O OO r- O r- d •- O (M It n O O (h O ch O (D O d ch OD O uj C14 r is .- ll N r� O O O tri O d h c� of O CD OD CV) inCOCV)tO N m a- O t0 41 CO C 44� OD m to ap > > m 0 E 3 O -_0 O Q V W ��O cN �` m X Oa3+ �`� O W- m mO +=>O v0- > mE Lam" cm� Q Om 0 Cca a pm o J w 2 m ti QN -� a E o ant a ola E c c E Z ao c3 a ce a — CL ,,. — E N cm iu O c ; oc Qa = to o a O. t. E o o .x u, o m E d o m m a �, m m wm c m m �Qo> +-� y= >> "' O c an w 41 O+ � 3. O a`ON to 1=tO!S UEIL O � � UQ U aaa- acn a 0( o m ai co ±� '0) o o � t 1n > C44. O a co) th O m N LL r+ O c m p m v =3 G. r }% OD'G N m O c Q p m U m m� -a mta U_ �+ a+ c O cA -G 0.0 E t t� 410 a a V d = E 00 a V �..,�� a 0 >`. O U E cu m 'Do c co CD r-c o tumor M °� +0 41 c if O +_� a- , ° m C4 c 0 m CD� 'C = �` m V _ .� SS C O c p O- m W 7 y N> Z fl t m v s t L: $ 1= a c' m a o a c (D > 0) +-' dl O 4� >` c l6 m CD 41 a+ O N m t 0 U O V a 'O co) m 'D M M �p N C CD c CD c E E E m OfCD L L OD L CD m CD CD 0 CD 1 ate+ 4� N � m � 0 N m � m C CD-n E E m E o 0 4a m m m LO p C4 C4 N N d' CO O LU � C4 M 006 d0' G C!D N r-� m to � � O � 'i Q c `o O C� 3 1- U m CD a� ul ':6 _ m 41 c � m m o N r-> c oj �o _c L LL t C. 41> m %- CL O d CM CL = J a !� E 0 0'1 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PUBLIC WORKS TASKS Employee's Hourly Labor Breakdown Month: June 1 Thru June 30,2002 Crew #1 Crew #2 Crew #3 Maul_ & Labor Code Activity 4 Men 4 Man 1Men 1 Man TOTAL 1000 87 110 17 12 226 1001 Pot hole - Repairs/Patching 13 6 0 2 21 1006 Other Traffic Control 0 24.5 0 0 24.5 1008 Other Concaete Repairs/Construction 2 2 0 0 4 1009 Street Sign — Install (New) 22 29 0 3 54 1010 Street Signs — Repair/Maint. 86 19 2 0 107 1011 Debris Removal 8 28.5 0 0 36.5 1012 Right of Way Maintenance 1 27 0 0 28 1021 Clean Catch Basin Inlets/Outlets 2 0 2 0 2 1022 Rondo Channel Ortlet/Vauh Repair/Maint. 6 0 0 0 6 1023 Retention Basins Repair/Maintenance 0 35 0 0 35 1024 GuUer/Median Sand Removal 2 0 0 0 2 1025 Street Sweeping (Machine) 157 0 0 0 157 1026 Street Sweeping (Manually) 0 0 0 0 0 1027 Sidewa"ike Path Cleaning 0 1 1 0 1 1031 Parks & Retention Basins Insp./Ckan-up 12 34.5 30 S 84.5 1041 Mowing, Weeding, Sh mbs/Tree Trimming 23 0 0 3 26 1051 Landscgm4rrigation Contract Management 0 0 20 24 44 1052 Contract Management 0 0 5 14 19 1061 Small Tools Repair/Maint. 1 0 0 0. 1 1062 Equipment Repair/Maint. 10 23 Q a 33 1063 Vehicle Repair /Mamt. 11 36 1IF 0 47 1081 Trash/Litter/Recyclable Removal 0 8 S 2 15 1082 Vandalism Repairs 27 18 !i 0 51 1083 Graffiti Removal 43 85 # 2 171 1084 Maint. Yard/Building Repair/Maint. 24 18 0 42 1085 Seminars/Training 0 0 !t 8 8 1086 Special Events 3 2 0 0 5 1087 Emergency/Citizen Complaints/Requests 16 4 0 2 22 1088 Meetings . 13 12 2 22 52 1089 Office (Phones calls, paperwork, reports & Misc) 19 25.5 3 51 98.5 SUBTOTAL 588 559 132 156 1435 1091 Over Time 21 3 0 0 24 1094 Jury Duty (Steve) 0 0 0 0 0 1095 Sick Leave 28 0 24 4 56 1096 Vacation 24 17 4 0 45 1097 Holiday 0 0 0 0 0 1098 STD (Short Term Disability) (George) 0 64 0 0 64 1099 Bereavement Leave ( ) 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOLAL 73 84 28 4 189 TOTAL HOURS 661 643 160 160 1,624 TOTAL MILES 2,805 2,055 612 509 5,980 30/ 008 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 1 CITY OF LA Q UINTA POLICE DEPAR TMENT MONTHL Y REPOR T June 2002 • DUI arrests up due to increased holiday enforcement efforts. • Felony assaults drop in May statistics. • Traffic citations double / Traffic collisions remain steady. 308 City of La Quinta La Quinta Police Department Captain John Horton, Commanding June 2002 Highlights (Numbers in parenthesis denotes number of calls for service that day) Saturday, 06-01-02 (55): Mauricio Rosales (27yrs of La Quinta) arrested for public intoxication. Dep. Bashe Jesse Valenzuela (50yrs of La Quinta) arrested for public intoxication. Dep. Fstrada Sunday, 06-02-02 (42): Attempted Residential Burglary at the 53-300 block of Ave. Martinez. Seventeen -year -old victim, Carlos Martinez, said he saw someone wearing a black hooded sweatshirt attempting to pry the screen off the living room window. He said the subject was also holding a handgun. The suspect reportedly ran away when the victim looked out the front door running South on Ave Martinez. An Area check was conducted but no suspects located. Screen was dusted for fingerprints. No other physical evidence. Dep. Hernandez Monday, 06-03-02 45: No Significant Activity. Tuesday,_06-04-02 (47): Kathy Laird (50yrs of La Quinta) was arrested for public intoxication. Dep. Anguiano Major Injury 'Traffic Collision at Ave. 50 X Vista Montana. Jonathan Yslas was west bound on Ave 50 in a 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier when he lost control of the vehicle. The vehicle left the roadway and collided with a tree. Yslas sustained major head and chest injuries and was transported to Desert Hospital. Dep. Orr Wednesday, 06-05-02_(61): Robbery (Person) - HMA, 50 yrs, 505, 150, pushes victim and removes victims purse flees on foot at Hwy I I I and Washington, NFI Traffic collision at Washington and Via Sevilla, minor injuries, and Primary collision factor running a stop sign Burglary (Veh.) at Totally Nails, window smash, blue wallet containing $8.00 taken, NFI Thursday, 06-06-02 (52): Nancy Wheaton, 66 yrs from PGA West, was arrested for DUI after she backed her vehicle into marked patrol unit and failed FST's Friday, 06-07-02 (61): Pete Williams, 10/13/75 of Bermuda Dunes was arrested for poss. of a controlled substance at Montezuma and Ave Diaz Saturday, 06-08-02 (43): D.U.I. Alfonso Garcia Marquez (40yrs of La Quinta). Dep. Adams D.U.I. Jaime Aguilar (20yrs of Coachella) had a BAC of. I 1 /. 12. Dep. Orr J Sunday, 06-09-02 (46): Domestic Battery at the 54-000 block of Ave. Mendoza. Ray Welch (45 years of La Quinta) was arrested for battery on spouse_ His live-in girlfriend, Shirley Hill (38 yrs) stated that Welch had choked her until she became dizzy during an argument_ No injury to throat but she had a minor injury to her wrist. Deputy IIernandez Monday, 06-10-02 Burglary at the 77-900 block of Calle Monterey. About 1845hrs the victim saw two suspects leaving his residence. Suspect 91, Hispanic male, 6', 200lbs, wearing a white T-shirt and blue jeans. Suspect 92, White female, 5'7", 135lbs, blonde hair. They left in a newer white Chevy/ GMC pickup north on Bermudas. Dep, Ervin Tuesday, 06-11-02 Assault and vehicle theft at the 54-100 block of Ave Martinez. Female victim Daryl Starkey (32yrs of La Quinta) reported that she had been punched in the face (broken nose, teeth and cheekbone) by suspect Nathan Padgett (20yrs) after she foiled his attempt to sell a stolen truck. The suspect left the area prior to Deputies' arrival but the truck, a green Toyota, was recovered at Eisenhower and Temecula. Dep. Speir Wednesday, 06-12-02 (70) Five juveniles in custody for vandalism (graffiti) at Washington bridge at Channel drive. Deputy Wedertz saw two heading towards wash area and alerted area deputies. Perimeter set up but by then the juveniles were fleeing. Deputy Wedertz caught two; one kept running but was caught on other side of wall in housing tract he fled to. He was to be charged with resisting arrest as well as vandalism. Three or four escaped. A backpack full of spray cans was found and the suspects admit to the vandalism. They are providing information on the others suspects and other crimes. All to be filed out of custody (148 suspect). All are students at LQHS. Battery in progress Ca), the Red Robin. Contacted was Kristian Caballero, 21 yrs. Indio. Caballero said an unknown subject punched him. Caballeros was determined to be too intoxicated to care for his safety Thursday, 06-13-02 (54): Burglary at the 52-600 block of Ave Navarro taken was a $200 mountain bike from a garage Friday, 06714-02 (60): Vehicle theft and Burglary @ the 54-100 bloc of Ave. Martinez. Suspect is Nathan Padgette, 21 yrs a PAL. Burglary at the 47600 block of Eisenhower, (Fairway Villas), no force, taken were (2) VCR's; (2) Golf bags and clubs; 15-20 bottles of wine. Shoplifting at Lowe's. Contacted was Clifton Foster, 39 yrs, who is on parole for burglary. Foster has previous contacts for theft and was arrested for petty theft with priors and parole violation. Veronica Cancino, 03/24/78, from 907 was arrested for DUI Saturday, 06-15-02 (48): No Significant Activity Sunday, 06-16-02 (31): Travis Blankenship, 25 yrs., was arrested for public intoxication at Ave Rubio and Ave Montezuma Burglary at the 53000 block of Ave Montezuma, taken was $2,200 worth of golf equipment from garage area, no force. 310 Monday, 06-17-02_(45): Brandon Bonbrake, 090782, of Bermuda Dunes and Dely Martinez, 081086, of Indio were arrested for shoplifting at La Quinta Wal-Mart. Tuesday, 06-18-02 53 : Burglary at Wal-Mart in La Quinta. Store camera captured a white 4dr-sedan (NFI) park next to a truck in the southwest portion of the parking lot. Two subjects exited the white vehicle, and one broke the passenger side of the truck, reached inside, and took unknown items from the vehicle. The subjects then got back into sus_ vehicle and left northbound thru lot towards Hwy 111. Deputy Hoyt from CVNTF advised he was on stakeout of residence at the 44700 block of Saffron, La Quinta. They were waiting for the suspect to leave so as to make an arrest. Apparently the suspect, a Vago MC club member was not present but they located a sawed off shotgun and controlled substances in plain sight. The case is part of a statewide indictment of Vago members and raids are being conducted in various homes. Deputy Hoyt obtained a search warrant while the premises were secured. At 1300 they were searching and lie advised that they would have at least one in custody for later transport. Wednesday, 06-19-02 (55): Ramon Quintana, 07/05/82, of Palm Springs was arrested for public intoxication at Francis hack Park Florentino Perez, 15 yrs., from Cathedral City was arrested for poss. of a designated controlled substance and poss. of marijuana at Francis Hack Park Burglary at La Quinta High School, taken was a computer and monitor, NFI Shortly after 0730 hours La Quinta Police responded to a reported stabbing at the AM/PM. Witnesses said that two men had been fighting in the parking lot and that one had been stabbed. Both men had left in their own vehicles and were not at the business when deputies arrived. Based on descriptions of the vehicles and of the participants of the fight a Palm Desert Police Officer stopped a vehicle on Hovely Lane. Juan Avalos, 26, of Indio, was detained and later positively identified as the suspect who had stabbed Erasmo Perez, 20, also of Indio. Thursday, 06-20-02 (64): Brandon Ratcliff(021079) and Jerry Moreno (09/27/80) were arrested for burglary at Circle K on Tampico Cameron Delville, 08/23/84 and Aaron Daily, 12/14/82 were arrested for public intoxication at the 52-400 block of Ave Rubio Santa Rosa Cove guard shack reported a vandalism. Subjects in a black Honda Civic with four occupants drove passed and fired five paint balls at the shack. NFI Friday, 06-21-02 (33): Burglary (Garage) at the 78000 block of Calle Norte taken was a Colt 45 hidden in a tool box from a retired Culver City PD officer (La Quinta Set Team) Richard Gonzalez, 06/03/62 of Indio was arrested for attempt robbery, burglary, and conspiracy. Crime occurred on Independence Way, second suspect still outstanding Saturday, 06-22-02 (54)- Vehicle theft from the 79-200 block of Catrino vehicle from drive -way 31.1 Sunday, 06-23-02 (43) Large amount of graffiti to block wall on Miles X Seeley Drive during the night. Deputy Reynolds assigned to photograph and document, City notified for removal. Vandalism at the 78000 block of Francis Hack at the Fritz Burns building entrance, NFI 14-year-old rock climber at Lake Cahuilla, fell about 30 feet and injured head and other scrapes. He was about 300 feet up the mountain. Initially CDF requested helicopter and RMU to respond but after they were called they said they could get him down. Arturo Castro, Thermal was brought down and then airlifted to Desert suffering from dehydration and scrapes. AOD by Deputy Estrada . Monday, 06-24-02 (45): Auto theft arrest at Hidalgo X Eisenhower. Joaquin Carlos Zamora (29yrs old / transient) attempted to sell a 1999 Ford Explorer to an area resident for fifty dollars. The resident reported the suspicious activity and upon arrival Zamora was located parked in a nearby driveway. Dep. Brewster Tuesday, 06-25-02 46 : Members of La Quinta SET team in conjunction with Parole and Indio Police conducted a parole / probation sweep. Arrested were Peter De La Garza (47yrs / of La Quinta) for four felony warrants, Cristo Gonzalez (21 / of La Quinta) for burglary warrant and Liliana Gutierrez (31yrs / of La Quinta) for felony warrant. Shoplift at Wal-Mart. Kenneth Kyler (50yrs / of Coachella) was cite released on scene. Dep. Ervin Wednesday, 06-26-02 (46): No significant activity Thursday, 06-27-02 (42): Julio Cesar Anaya, ,1 H 869 from La Quinta, was arrested for poss. of a controlled substance. Poss. of 3.6 grams of Meth. Friday, 06-28-02 (5-5): Major accident at Fred Waring and Adams. A Plaza Shell Tow truck was eastbound on Fred Waring struck a northbound Mazda MPV. The impact caused major damage to both vehicles. The tow truck continued eastbound and ran off the road into the desert area and through the front yard of a residence causing damage to the yard area. Sgt. Ammons/ Sgt. Friedli/ and Lt. Donowho were notified. Members from the La Quinta Traffic Team and ID technician responded to the scene. The Tow truck driver was Paul Collins, 11/23/78 from Indio and the other driver was Richard Wasson, 03/20/63 from Palm Desert. Major injuries to both drivers. Traffic Collision, vehicle vs motorcycle (injury) at Adams and Miles Primary collision factor making an unsafe left turn or U-turn Saturday, 06-29-02 Q Drug Overdose at the 71-900 block of Diane. Samual Rissman reported that his son Adam Rossman (18yrs) had overdosed on some type of pills. Adam was unresponsive and was transported to J_F.K. Hospital where he was placed on life support. He reportedly has no brain wave activity and isn't expected to recover. Sunday, 06-30-02 (38): No significant Incidents. Total calls for service:1455 431 CITY of LA QUINTA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT SCHOOL: LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL Deputy Stephen Morton HIGHLIGHTS: • Two students were arrested and cited for truancy violations. • Five arrests were enrolled into the Youth Accountability Program. • One arrest was for a student in possession of and smoking marijuana on school grounds. • One arrest for a student making threats to another on a cellular telephone. • One arrest for a student causing injury in an assault. • I attended training sponsored by the Youth Accountability Team. The training consisted of Street Drug Recognition and Gangs. The training provided information on the 'Rave Scene' along with drugs being used by juveniles. • Along with the District Attorney's Office and the Probation Office, conducted home visits reference truant students and participants in the Youth Accountability Program. • Conducted follow-up investigations on reports from patrol Deputies. • Counseled students that violated school rules, which were not violations of state law, but serious enough to warrant discussing the incident as a preventative measure. • Assisted the school staff with several incidents of medical aids, inappropriate behavior and comments made by one student to another. Actual reporting period covers May 27, 2002 through June 21, 2002. 313 CITY of LA QUINTA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT June 2002* SCHOOL: LA QUINTA MIDDLE SCHOOL Deputy: Robert Brooker RSO Grant Funded Position School Session: June 15t, 2002 through June 12th, 2002. HIGHLIGHTS: • I assisted the school staff in meetings with the parents of students who are at risk of being referred to the Student Attendance Review Board, due to attendance problems. • I assisted the school staff with several incidents of, inappropriate behavior, and name-calling, which is an ongoing problem. • Counseled students that violated school rules, but were not violations of state law. • The most significant event during the last two weeks of school was, the school staff received information that two students were seen off campus, during school hours, in an apartment complex near the campus. After using school records to identify the apartment of a former student and friend of the two students ditching, I made contact with them and arrested them for truancy and referred them to YAT. 314 LA QUINTA POLICE MOTORCYCLE ACTIVITY REPORT PROGRAM STATISTICS JUNE 2002 (Speed Violations 23 Lane Change Violation ail to YieldSeatSeat Belt Violations ing Violations DUI Arrests (Stop Sign Violations Cut Traffic for Citation I Light Violations Cut Traffic for Collision ild Seat Violations I 0 1 Warnings HIGHLIGHTS Prepared By: Deputy Dave Adams C� Tows 3 Injury T/C �V J © Non -Injury T/C C] Suspended DL Non -Moving 23 C� 15 1 Fatal T/C 060502 - Misd. warrant served. 060702 - Two Misd. warrants served. 061202 - Non -injury T/C at Dune Palms x Hwy 111. PCF 22106 VC. 061402 - Non -injury T/C at Jefferson St. x Fred Waring Dr. PCF 22350 VC. 062702 - Felony arrest for 11377(a) H&S. 062702 - Misd. warrant served. 062802 - Non -injury T/C at 52885 Ave. Martinez. PCF 22515 VC. 062802 - Major injury T/C at Fred Waring Dr. and Adams St. PCF 21453(a) VC. The La Quinta Traffic team conducted a traffic safety program during the May Memorial weekend. This program ran from 1700 hrs till 0300 hrs, on May 24th, 25th, and 26th, 2002. The purpose of this entry is to report the statistics from this program. Vehicle stops: 82 Citations: 27 Parking citations: 3 Speeding citations: 12 Equipment citations: 3 DUI arrest: 9 Vehicles stored: 6 T/C's: 5 DUI T/C's: 3 Arrest warrants: 6 3.1 5 La Quinta Police Department Special Enforcement Team Monthly Report June 2002 Investigator Eller / Sergeant Ammons / Deputy Jimenez / Deputy Armstrong The following is a summary of the Special Enforcement Team activities for the month of June. Ongoing Investigations 2 Probation Searches 3 Parole Searches 1 Arrests/ Filings 10 Vehicle checks 5 Business Contacts 10 Investigation assists 7 Arrest Warrants Served 7 Arrest Warrants Attempted 12 Programs 1 Pedestrian Checks 31 Crime Prevention Hours 4 Bar Checks 0 Back-ups 4 Follow-ups 38 Search Warrants 0 Meetings 3 Recovered Stolen Property 0 Citations issued 0 Surveillance's 3 Property Checks 8 Civil Commitments 0 Bicycle Time 0 Training Hours 9 Illegal Drugs Seized 0 Total Mileage: 260 miles Noteworthy Accomplishments; - The La Quinta SET arrested Ricardo Gonzalez for burglary, attempted robbery and conspiracy. Gonzalez had committed burglaries in homes in the north end of La Quinta taking appliances. A warrant is out for the arrest of Johnny Berrios, Gonzalez's accomplice. La Quinta SET participated in a valley wide parole/probation sweep held by Indio Police Department. During the sweep the La Quinta SET arrested three individuals who had a total of six outstanding felony warrants. La Quinta SET received training on the Rapid Response protocol for natural disaster response and pre -planning for natural disasters. - La Quinta SET arrested Richard Ruiz for burglary, fraud and forgery from the Lowe's Hardware store, during an investigation with the SCVCSD. - La Quinta SET has begun laying the groundwork for educating the public on the ongoing Burglary Prevention Program, by contacting the HOA's and security directors for all residential communities in the La Quinta area. I1(It Riverside County Sheriff's Department EXPLORER POST 503 PROGRAM REPORT June 2002 June 2002 ExplorerPost 503 Program Report One training meeting was held on June 4. The meeting covered physical training, marching practice, volleyball, and the 10 and 11 codes test. Captain Andres Martinez handled the physical training, marching practice, and 10 and 11 codes test. I supervised the volleyball games. Fourteen Explorer Post 503 Explorers and I attended the annual Explorer Post 503 banquet. The banquet was held in La Quinta at the Red Robin Restaurant on June 11. Captain Andres Martinez led physical training for some Explorer Post 503 Explorers on June 18 and 25. Explorer Post 503 Sergeant Juan Viramontes and Explorer Adrian Viramontes volunteered time to assist with the Riverside County Sheriffs Department Finding Our Way Youth Camp #9 in Forest Falls on June 7-9, 2002. Upcoming events for Explorer Post 503 Explorers include the Explorer National Competition, July 8-13, 2002, and the Riverside County Sheriff's Department Explorer Academy, August 11-17, 2002. Explorer Post 503 Explorers are working on getting in shape for the two above described outings. 31i CITY OF IAA QUINTA MAY CRIME COMPARISONS CRIME MAY 2002 MAY 2001 YID (02) YTD (01) *HOMICIDE 0 0 U 1 *RAP'E S.,EX CRIMES (FEL) 0 2 1 0 4 5 6 0 SEX CRIMES lWISI) 2 5 8 8 ROBBERY 1 2 9 4 ASSAULT (FEL) 9 9 56 43 ASSAULT MISD 20 25 84 94 BURGLARY 6.4 58 276 252 14 21 64 49 38 23 144 110 i hit':I"I' (11I:IS;i)� 41 45 2416 190 VANDALISM MISI9 34 20 :1 38 120 DOM. VIOLENCE 13 15 64 67 NARCOTICS 6 12 43 58 Mil 21 10 63 43 T/C NON -INJURY 64 52 287 229 T/C MURY 9 10 37 26 UC FATAL 0 0 0 2 TRAFFIC CITATIONS 447 215 1893 1598 * STATISTICS INCLUDE ATTEMPTS 319 F- z w ry F" N O O N W Q 000 � W o U �' J a ry 0 75 0 ^ U LL W Q 2 U z I I I I MI I I I I I I I N I I01I W I i I I I I I I I I ' NI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I Cb Lid co II I I I I I I I I I I I I TI I II I I I L' I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I �/!��■ VII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I N I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I OI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O I I I I I I O O O O O O O I` CO Li) d' M N G n w w co g c� J D N Q w m co X w co w a I w 0 U_ O T 320 z w G N O O N ry } ^ a I..L O W U) 0 a L1J 2 0 U w 0 J � U W H as 0 zry Q � w C� Q J I I I I O I I I I I I II I I I I I d1 I I I rN I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I! I F V I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I N I I I Lo N (0 I ti N I I I I I I I I I II I I II I II I II II I I I II I I M I I I I I I CD I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I o O O O O O O O LO O LO O LO O LO co M N N � � IR w LL w H w g C9 W m LL J Q N Q w m m w w U w N w d w U_ O T z w ry w 0 w 0 J d a z :D Q J O O Q Z O F— co ry v ) 0 w i N ry U LL w F 0 N W To oLO LLC LLq W H 06 N V-- O O N N N I LO ' � N O ' N N o r O O CD N N O Ln O O U'i co N N V- w w 0 w 0 a CD a U w J U_ w J w O 2 J O U J a U w 2 2 O U a z w 0 w O C�rl?) w 0 J Q H z 0 a J O O N Q W U_ U) Of 0 H U) J Q U U- O Z !O VNJ ry ^Q LS1� L O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Ln o Ln N - 3P-4 N z0 N W } U � a N L.I. > Qry w n Q� w 0 0 � J J WLL a U U 0 J z 0 0 n Q Q � � o U Z w Q o Q� w J } N co N N 0 0 O 00 Cfl IZT N O 325 z w ry 2 w 0 w 0 J d Q H z 0 Q J N O O CQ G U Q U I Q LL O Z O Cn ry Q n O U N � O O N N Q Q I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I OI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NI I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C.0 I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LO I NI O O O O O L-O ICT M N r- D z D z z z U H z O U LL LL a 3?6 CITY OF LA QUINTA DISPATCH INFORMATION / MAY 2002 TYPE OF CALL - RESPONSE TIME (MINUTES) NUMBER OF INCIDENTS EMERGENCY----- 4.4 2 ROUTINE 10.6 1077 *STATSTAKEN FROM RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF DATA WAREHOUSE RESPONSETIME REPORT 3 -9- "1 0I-A CITY OF LAQUINTA LA QUINTA POLICE 82-695 DR. CARREON BLVD., INDIO MEMORANDUM TO: o Genovese / City Manager Date: 06/28/02 FR: Ton Greg Ammons / La Quinta Police Operations RE: Year ending 2001 Report / Traffic Collisions and Citations The attached report is presented for your review and dissemination to City Staff and City Council. This report was compiled from data collected and input into the Crossroads, "Traffic Collision and Citation Database." As you recall the City obtained a grant last year from the Office of Traffic Safety which was used to purchase this software. These reports, in the future, will be provided on a quarterly basis. 328 City of La Quinta Police Department Traffic Analysis Report 0612712002 Date Range Reported: 0110112001 to 12131/2001 This Period Year -to -Date Total Collisions 292 292 Total Collisions Involving Fatality 1 1 Total Collisions Involving Injury 74 74 Total Collisions Involving Property Damage 217 217 Total Fatalities 1 1 Total Injuries 117 117 Total DUI Collisions 23 23 DUI Collisions Involving Fatality 0 0 DUI Collisions Involving Injury 7 7 DUI Collisions Involving Property Damage 16 16 Total DUI Fatalities 0 0 Total DUI Injuries 10 10 DUI Arrests 111 111 Total Non -DUI Collisions 269 269 Non -DUI Collisions Involving Fatalities 1 Non -DUI Collisions Involving Injuries 67 67 Non -DUI Collisions Involving Property Damage 201 201 Total Non -DUI Fatalities 1 1 Total Non -DUI Injuries 107 107 Private Property Collisions 4 4 Total Bicycle Collisions 1 1 Total Pedestrian Collisions 3 3 Total Citations 1838 1838 Hazardous Citations 1505 1505 Non -Hazardous Citations 333 333 Seat Belt Citations 18 18 Child Restraint Citations 25 25 Traffic Enforcement Index 20.1 20.1 Traffic Collision Index 2.9 2.9 DUI Index 15.9 15.9 Safety Restraint Index 0.02 0.02 Most Frequent Primary Collision Factor Unsafe Speed Unsafe Speed Footnotes: Traffic Enforcement Index Haz Citations + DUI Arrests / Fatal & Injury Collisions (20:1) Traffic Collision Index Non -Injury Collisions / Fatal + Injury Collisions (2.5:1) DUI Index DUI Arrests / DUI Fatal + Inury Collisions (10:1) Safety Restraint Index Seat Belt + Child Restraint Citations / Haz + Non-Haz Citatinn5 3,2.9 City of La Quinta Police Department Auto R!W Viola Improper Turning 46 (15.75%) Traffic Signals and Signs 29 (9.93 Driving Under Influence 23 (7.88%) Rear -End 90 (30.82%) fe Speed 66 (22.60%) Other Than Driver or Ped 6 (2.059/6) Other Improper Driving 7 (2.40%) Unknown 10 (3.42%) )thers 15 (5.14%) Change 16 (5.48%) Unsafe Starting or Backing 22 (7.53%) Primary Collision Factors Hit Object 50 (17.12%) Collision Types (33.22%) Vehicle - Pedestrian 3 (1.03%) Overturned 6 (2.05%) Head -On 6 (2.05%) Other 7 (2.40%) pe 33 (11.30%) 330 01/01/2001 to 12/31/2001 Total Collisions: 292 City of La Quinta Police Department Collisions by Month 01/01/2001 to 12/31/2001 Total Collisions: 292 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 331 City of La Quinta Police Department Collisions by Day of Week 01/01/2001 to 12/31/2001 Total Collisions: 292 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 33`' 0 ttt � r •� C LL C 3 O U O d d L. cm 4) 0 0 •� L O O N w O C F- 7 (� CO) N U LA. C O O •cc LL F) C.) c CM c O Ac V- CD U � o •E a. o U. E a` e e o 0 o e e o o e e o 0 0 0 h w O e e e e e e e e e e e e N M O w h N to to w v w w N O w O M h h P9 N "t tC M tb M M O! 'It � N � T- co h t!! w tM e- T- � T- O O O h OM h to to O le Go e! M m N w N m 'T- %- N T- 0 0 0 O h O r! M OR "It C! 't ll� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 o O N o 0 0 0 0 t70 4 t O N cc N d' It le Q' N h N w Cl) � � � � r 0 0 0 0 0 N O N N N N 0 a O 0 O V.- C! t10 to et "t O r! V! t0 tD tD M N O! h h tp M N N � � O O O O toN N N I -.to t} N N N e- CM tmi cY! m CM c to _ N m m m 2 o 0 V O m :2. m c c o l4 O O O L CL G O O 0 -0 O V m O tv L- a ~ co = cc a m m v d N C N m N N J c E t c U) m to t r O to o o c m N > m tl to Z t ++ a £ It0 > > > O O � 3 O O z O N I h 337 �� 0 0 e e o Cn V) (0 Go � O e- to O! M r! Q! 1- CD ti to N O N er- Cn CO 1� M r N r Cn O M r t\O ti ^ M o 0 0 0 0 0 M O O M O �' ~ r ~ v r M M CO w w N N 4 e- of N r M r r r CO r O! sY M r NM N r N r r e o o \ o r f- <O CA ~ C! le It V N r N to r O M M M h le <o N v N r r r 0 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 0 Lq N N N N Co W N r r r r N r r r r N O! M M M r N 0 r e O O O O r r N O M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CA O Co N N co M to V.- M MI)coCo Co O CA CA N w r !- " r I� M M M M 1� O N V.: ^ -i 4 4 M N r O O O O O N N r V Cq O V N N Or co M N r r r r M m m C .o Q C L ' = L O m :L O c C! Q u- C3 m G O cm m to cc c = L 0 Q � O �m m m m C. O Q 0 -0'p O m F cc CL co cc cc CL cm M cc cn cn m y H 3 E a! = c o xm m m a m m O m= m= o N m 0 � C. 0 > aA L aC t o — a L L a' E o 5 o 5 0 3 LL€ z o o ti r O m N 334 City of La Quinta Police Department Citation Summary Report 0612712002 City: All Date Range Reported: 0110112001 to 12131/2001 Category Quantity Total Number of Citations 1838 Total Number of Violations 2431 Total Number of Hazardous Citations 1505 Total Number of Hazardous Violations 1648 Total Number of Non -Hazardous Citations 333 Total Number of Non -Hazardous Violations 783 Total Number of DUI Arrests 0 Total Number of DUI Citations 111 Total Actual DUI 111 Total Number of Parking Citations 2 Total Number of Radar Citations 442 Total Number of Pedestrian Citations 1 Total Number of Pedestrian Violations 1 Total Number of Bicycle Citations 2 Total Number of Bicycle Violations 2 Total Number of Safety Belt Citations 18 Total Number of Safety Belt Violations 18 Total Number of Child Restraint Citations 25 Total Number of Child Restraint Violations 27 Total Number of Financial Responsibility Citations 268 33 Iti City of La Quinta Police Department Detailed Citation Report From: 01/01/2001 To: 12/31/2001 Category Quantity Excessive Speed Citations 652 Excessive Speed Violations 652 Signs and Signals Citations 384 Signs and Signals Violations 385 Unsafe Turning Citations 97 Unsafe Turning Violations 97 Failure to Yield Citations 21 Failure to Yield Violations 21 Child Restraint Citations 25 Child Restraint Violations 27 Safety Belt Citations 18 Safety Belt Violations 18 DUI Cites 111 DUI Arrests 0 Actual DUI 111 Other Hazardous Citations 110 Other Hazardous Violations 493 Non -Hazardous Citations 333 Non -Hazardous Violations 783 Total Hazardous Citations 1505 Total Hazardous Violations 1648 Pedestrian Citations 1 Pedestrian Violations 1 Bicycle Citations 2 Bicycle Violations 2 Financial Responsibility 268 Radar Cites 442 Parking Cites 2 Total Hazardous Double Stat 1548 Total Citations 1838 Total Violations 2431 �3f Citation Violators by Zip Code 6127102 F rom D 1 /2001 to 12/31 /2001 ZIP Code Number of Violators Cq 92253 701 LA QUINTA 92201 460 INDIO 92236 119 COACHELLA 92260 88 PALM DESERT 92211 52 PALM DESERT 92234 48 CATHEDRAL CITY 92274 40 THERMAL 92262 22 PALM SPRINGS 92254 19 MECCA 92276 18 THOUSAND PALMS 92240 16 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 92264 10 PALM SPRINGS 92210 7 INDIAN WELLS 92241 5 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 92284 5 YUCCA VALLEY 92270 3 RANCHO MIRAGE 92252 2 JOSHUA TREE 92543 2 HEMET 92561 2 MOUNTAIN CENTER 92277 2 TWENTYNINE PALMS 92592 2 TEMECULA 92374 2 REDLAN DS 92663 2 NEWPORT BEACH 92203 2 I N DI O 95076 2 WATSONVILLE 92256 2 MORONGO VALLEY 92127 1 SAN DIEGO 95148 1 SAN JOSE 92021 1 EL CAJON 92220 1 BANNING 92223 1 BEAUMONT 92109 1 SAN DIEGO 92108 1 SAN DIEGO 92082 1 VALLEY CENTER 92225 1 B LYT H E 92056 1 OCEANSIDE 92115 1 SAN DIEGO 91311 1 CHATSWORTH 90046 1 LOS ANGELES .937 ZIP Code Number of Violators City 90063 1 LOS ANGELES 90210 1 BEVERLY HILLS 90266 1 MANHATTAN BEACH 90277 1 REDONDO BEACH 90731 1 SAN PEDRO 91024 1 SIERRA MADRE 91107 1 PASADENA 92014 1 DEL MAR 91307 1 WEST HILLS 92230 1 CABAZON 91343 1 NORTH HILLS 91345 1 MISSION HILLS 91356 1 TARZANA 91381 1 STEVENSON RANCH 91406 1 VAN NUYS 91602 1 NORTH HOLLYWOOD 91762 1 ONTARIO 91766 1 POMONA 91789 1 WALNUT 91911 1 CHULA VISTA 91204 1 GLENDALE 92675 1 SAN JUAN CAPISTRAN 92544 1 HEMET 92243 1 EL CENTRO 92570 1 PERRIS 92583 1 SAN JACINTO 92585 1 SUN CITY 92602 1 I RVI N E 94596 1 WALNUT CREEK 92660 1 NEWPORT BEACH 92539 1 ANZA 92677 1 LAGUNA NIGUEL 92683 1 W ESTM I NSTER 92801 1 ANAHEIM 92806 1 ANAHEIM 92807 1 ANAHEIM 92833 1 FULLERTON 92886 1 YORBA LINDA 93060 1 SANTA PAULA 92630 1 LAKE FOREST 93241 1 LAMONT 94506 1 DANVILLE 92250 1 HOLTVI LLE 2 ZIP Code Number of Violators Ccti L 93215 1 DELANO 94062 1 REDWOOD CITY 90024 1 LOS ANGELES 94044 1 PACI FICA 92562 1 MURRIETA 94028 1 PORTOLA VALLEY 92530 1 LAKE ELSINORE 92310 1 FORT IRWIN 92316 1 BLOOMINGTON 92335 1 FONTANA 92345 1 HESPERIA 92356 1 LUCERNE VALLEY 92505 1 RIVERSIDE 92507 1 RIVERSIDE 92509 1 RIVERSIDE 95454 1 LAYTONVILLE Total Violators (with zip info): 1705 3 33�� Citations By Age Range 27-Jun-02 Date Range: 01/01/2001 to 12/31/2001 AAe No. 0-14 2 15 - 19 263 20 - 24 318 25 - 29 225 30 - 34 208 35 - 39 194 40 - 44 190 45 - 49 107 50 - 54 75 55 - 59 60 60 - 64 42 65 - 69 32 70 - 74 11 75 - 79 5 80 - 84 1 85 - 89 1 Over 100 0 Unknown 100 1 34�) City of La Quinta Police Department High Incidence Intersection Report 6/27/02 Number of collisions for the top 10 locations From 1/1/01 To 12/31/01 Rank Intersection 1 Miles Avenue at Adams Street 2 Rt 111 at Adams Street 3 Washington Street at Rancho La Quints Drive 4 Washington Street at Avenue 52 5 Washington Street at Rt 111 6 Rt 111 at Plaza La Quinta 7 Rt 111 at La Qunta Centre Drive 8 Simon Drive at Rt 111 9 Washington Street at Miles Avenue 10 Washington Street at Avenue 48 Settings Used For Query Parameter Starting Date Ending Date At Intersection Minimum Number of Collisions Setting: 01/01/2001 12/31/2001 Intersection Related 1 Total Collisions 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 N 341 City of La Quinta Police Department High Incidence Midblock Report 6127/02 Number of collisions for the top 20 locations From 1l1/01 To 12/31/01 Rank Seament Total Collisions 1 Adams Street from Westward Drive to Rt 111 8 2 Washington Street from Eisenhower Drive to Avenue 48 7 3 Calls Tampico from Washington Street to Seasons Way 4 4 Rt 111 from Adams Street to Simon Drive 4 5 Rt 111 from Depot Drive to Dune Palms Road 4 6 Rt 111 from Washington Street to Plaza La Quinta 4 7 Washington Street from Rt 111 to Channel Drive 4 8 Avenue 52 from Jefferson Street to Old Avenue 52 3 9 Jefferson Street from Avenue 50 to Avenue 48 3 10 Rt 111 from Plaza La Quinta to End2 3 11 Washington Street from Channel Drive to Mlles Avenue 3 12 Washington Street from Rt 111 to Singing Palms Drive 3 13 Westward Drive from Adams Street to Dune Palms Road 3 14 Avenida Bermudas from Calle Nogales to Calle Chihuahua 2 15 Avenida Obregon from Calls Chillon to Calle Madrid 2 16 Avenue 50 from Washington Street to Grand Traverse Avenue 2 17 Avenue 52 from Washington Street to Adams Street 2 18 Blazing Star Trail from Buttercup Lane to Iris Court 2 19 Eisenhower Drive from Avenue 50 to End1 2 20 Eisenhower Drive from Calle Durango to Calls Sinaloa 2 20 Eisenhower Drive from Calle Nogales to Calle Ensenada 2 1 4 `' 20 Eisenhower Drive from Coachella Drive to Avenida Fernando (N) 20 Eisenhower Drive from Washington Street to Vista Laguna (E) 20 Fred Waring Drive from Washington Street to Royal Palm Drive 20 Rt I I I from Adams Street to Auto Center Way South 20 Rt 11f from Dune Palms Road to La Qunta Centre Drive 20 Rt I I I from La Qunta Centre Drive to Auto Center Way South 20 Rt III from Washington Street to Simon Drive 20 Washington Street from Avenue 50 to Saguaro Road 20 Washington Street from Highland Palms Drive to Via La Quinta Drive 20 Washington Street from Simon Drive to Avenue 47 Settings Used For Query Parameter Setting Starting Date 01/01/2001 Ending Date 12/31/2001 Intersections Not Intersection Related Minimum Number of Collisions 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 .y 4 J i i i 5 > > CO)CA ! 0 3 ! i $ CO)v to m v 1 > 0 3 o 3 < eo 3 'ao r 01 O m a 0 ca ° 3 < � o = A co 00 o3 0 CO) .. o D CD N (A c 3 n v < 3 m c M r A o 3 o v 7 ;a,o a x '0 3 a d N .. o g CO)C 0 3 c y p O 7 a `� Cl) -, o 3 3 c < 0 < CD ° OAD D f/1 d :a c, 3 N a e<o 0 O T, Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 Cl 0 y 3 <D O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O i O O ID _C fR p i O O O O O O O O O O O O O i O ^� _ S m 7 O p O O O O O 0) _ 7 T1 7 7 lz i N N W W N N W N A A W W W A Of L O 7 n O N N N W W W W W W A A A A A V co O I� 7 0 n O A O O v -h CD go 0) A r O � O m 14,1 N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O Co O O O O O O O co OD V :E vg ;a ;a m m_ m m_ m v D 61 0 M Di <o m Dl � i i _� i _� i m a iA � dl 0 5 � tp M _m to 0 y N < 9D S S C > > S S ? ? S CD to to a O O O O O O O O O co CA O O O 3 3 3 3 W co CD 0 ^' > > m 'Z 1 '1 N CO) prj D p v v v v p o c CL Z � Te<D T.fu e<D Q 0 0 'o 3 a 3 3 3 0 n 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 CO) 2 D N 3 0 n 0 0 D Wcoo 3 cc <o •* o S (Am °' O S d O v O COL a S 0 ? ID 0 3 c � 7 7 c N r► �. — c 3 O N z O v C O C co) .► a cn O o m c m to c v CD 00 o CO)°'CD 3 c CD cc p a CO) D m c 3 eo o o p a .. o D < v too 0'' ^° 0 n m <D O Z 0 0 0 '< O O < 1D W O O CD A O m N p O too j V1 O p o+ d CCD a�i 0 O -., m r ° .< �. < m m m CDw o a) —i n O1 CO)0 3 c o m = c cc p 3 o — =r m o ID Z i N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 i 0 C. O w V W i O O O O O O O i O O O O O O O T O O O O O O O O O O i i O O O O i N e J W � N O O i CDi O CD O O V Oi C 'co m i N i N -A 0 i O O C to N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O 0 3415 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing on Tentative Tract Map 29053, Extension #2, a Request for a One Year Extension of Time Which Creates 103 Single Family Lots on 33 + Acres, Northwest of the Intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. Applicant: La Quinta Jefferson Fifty RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract Map 29053, Extension #2, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Project History The property, located northwest of the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50, has been recently graded for this project, with the southern portion previously used as a citrus grove (Attachment 1). Adjacent to the south and east of the property is the commercial site approved for a shopping center under Specific Plan 98- 034. The City Council approved this Tentative Tract Map for 103 single family lots on June 1, 1999. At the same time, a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Community Commercial to Low Density Residential was approved to allow this tract map. The first phase, consisting of 43 residential lots, the retention basin and water well site, has been recorded. No construction other than grading has taken place to date. p:\stan\tt 29053 ext 2 cc rpt.WPD 3 4 G The first one year time extension for this Tentative Tract Map was approved by the City Council on May 15, 2001. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 98-375 was certified by the City Council on June 1, 1999, for Tentative Tract Map 29053, General Plan Amendment 98-060, Zone Change 98-089, Specific Plan 98-034 and Parcel Map 29052, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. This request is in conformance with that approval and no changed circumstances or conditions exist which would trigger the preparation of subsequent environmental review pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166. Project Request Proposed is a second one year extension of time to record the final tract map. The Tentative Tract has 103 single family lots varying from 7,704 to 11,857 square feet (average 9,009 square feet) at a density of 3.1 dwelling units per acre (Attachment 2). The majority of lots are 80 feet wide and a minimum of 105 feet deep. The tract has unsignalized street access from Jefferson Street, with a signal allowed at the Avenue 50 access. These accesses are connected and act as a collector street for cul-de-sacs. Streets are to be private and gated at Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. A 3.9 acre irregularly shaped retention basin lot and .5 acre Coachella Valley Water District well site lot are shown at the southeast corner of the site adjacent to the proposed shopping center. Other miscellaneous lots will be created for the private streets and common area landscaping, including 20 foot deep lots adjacent to Avenue 50 and Jefferson Street. Public Notice This Tentative Tract Map extension application was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on July 5, 2002. All property owners within 500 feet of the site were mailed a copy of the Public Hearing notice as required by the Subdivision Ordinance of the La Quinta Charter and Municipal Code. As of this writing, no written comments have been received. Public Agency Review All applicable agency comments received have been made part of the Conditions of Approval for this case. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed this request at its meeting of June 25, 2002. The Commission unanimously adopted Resolution 2002-070, recommending approval of this request, subject to findings and amended conditions (Attachment 3). 341 p:\stan\tt 29053 ext 2 cc rpt.WPD 1 it FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The findings needed to approve this request can be met, as noted in the attached Resolution. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving a one year extension to Tentative Tract Map 29053, Extension #2, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving an one year extension for Tentative Tract Map 29053; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, erma6, Community Development Director Approved for submission by: l ' Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Location Map 2. Tentative Tract Map exhibit (Large for City Council only) 3. Planning Commission minutes for the meeting of June 25, 2002 348 pAstan\tt 29053 ext 2 cc rpt.WPD `� RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SECOND ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ALLOWING 103 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 33 NET ACRES CASE NO.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29053, EXTENSION #2 LA QUINTA JEFFERSON FIFTY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 16T" day of July, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of La Quinta Jefferson Fifty for approval of a one year extension of time for a Tentative Tract Map which creates 103 single family lots (34 lots recorded) and miscellaneous lots on 33 net acres in the RL Low Density Residential Zone, located northwest of the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50, more particularly described as: Portions of Section 32, T5S, R7E, SBBM WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 15T" day of May, 2001, approve a one year extension of time for this Tentative Tract Map, subject to conditions; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 1IT day of June, 1999, adopt Resolution 99-74, approving this Tentative Tract Map, subject to conditions; and, WHEREAS, said Tentative Tract Map has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-68), in that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 98-375 was certified by the City Council on June 1, 1999, for Tentative Tract Map 29053, General Plan Amendment 98-060, Zone Change 98-060, Specific Plan 98-034 and Parcel Map 29052 in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. This request is in conformance with that approval and no changed circumstances or conditions exist which would trigger the preparation of subsequent environmental review pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21 166; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 25T" day of June, 2002, adopt Resolution 2002-070, recommending approval of this Tentative Tract Map time extension, subject to conditions; and, 349 p:\stan\tt 29053 ext 2 cc res.wpd U t' 4 Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract Map 29053, Extension #1 La Quinta Jefferson Fifty Adopted: WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings approval of said extension to the Tentative Tract Map: 1. The map is consistent with the General Plan in that the lots are designated and to be used for Low Density Residential use. The development and improvements of the lots will comply with applicable development standards regarding setbacks, height restrictions, density, grading, access, streets, etc. 2. The design and proposed improvements of the map are consistent with the General Plan in that the development and improvements of the lots will comply with applicable development standards regarding setbacks, height restrictions, density, grading, access, streets, etc. 3. The design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish, or wildlife, or cause serious public health problems since the project is surrounded by development, or other urban improvements, and mitigation measures are required by the Mitigated Negative Declaration (EA 98-375), including noise mitigation adjacent to Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. This will be provided by berming, lowering of the adjacent residential pads, and construction of garden and retaining walls. 4. The design of the map or types of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the development of the land will require compliance with all health related requirements including provisions for sewers and water. 5. The design of the map will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the Map since none presently exist and new easements, as needed, will be provided and recorded. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; p:\stan\tt 29053 ext 2 cc res.wpd Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract Map 29053, Extension #1 La Quinta Jefferson Fifty Adopted: 2. That it does approve a second one year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map 29053 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16T" day of July, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 351 ry 0_ o p:\stan\tt 29053 ext 2 cc res.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29053, EXTENSION #2 LA QUINTA JEFFERSON FIFTY ADOPTED: GENERAL 1 . The subdivider agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this tentative map or any final map thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Tentative Tract Map 29053 shall comply with the requirements and standards of § § 66410 through 66499.58 of the California Government Code (the Subdivision Map Act) and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC). 3. Prior to the issuance of a grading, construction or building permit, or approval of the final map by the City Council, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances from the following public agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) The applicant is responsible for any requirements of the permits or clearances from those jurisdictions. If the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of said approvals prior to obtaining City approval of the plans. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit. For projects requiring project -specific NPDES construction permits, the applicant shall submit a copy of the Notice of Intent received from the CWQCB prior to issuance of a grading or site construction permit. The applicant shall ensure that the required Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan is available for inspection at the project site. 4. The applicant shall comply with the terms and requirements of the infrastructure fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. 3 5 � i-t 7 P:\STAN\tt 29053 ext 2 cc coa.wpd Page 1 of 13 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29053, EXTENSION #2 LA QUINTA JEFFERSON FIFTY ADOPTED: PROPERTY RIGHTS 5. Prior to approval of a final map, the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights required of the tentative map or otherwise necessary for construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of essential improvements. 6. The applicant shall dedicate or grant public and private street right of way and utility easements in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and as required by the City Engineer. 7. Right of way dedications required of this development include: A. Jefferson Street - 60-foot half of a 120-foot right of way. In addition, the owner shall make an irrevocable offer to grant an additional 17 feet of right of way, (not to exceed 250 feet in length), for future southbound turn lanes at the Avenue 50 intersection. B. Avenue 50 - 50-foot half of a 100-foot right of way C. Interior Collector Street - 41 feet undivided, 67 feet for divided sections. D. Other interior Street Lots - 37 feet plus additional for turn knuckle. E. Culs de sac radii - 38.5 feet. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. If the City Engineer determines that access rights to proposed street rights of way shown on the tentative map are necessary prior to approval of final maps dedicating the rights of way, the applicant shall grant interim easements to those areas within 60 days of written request by the City. 8. The applicant shall dedicate ten -foot public utility easements contiguous with and along both sides of all private streets. The easements may be reduced to five feet with the concurrence of IID. 353 P:\STAN\tt 29053 ext 2 cc coa.wpd Page 2 of 13 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29053, EXTENSION #2 LA QUINTA JEFFERSON FIFTY ADOPTED: 9. The applicant shall create perimeter setbacks along public rights of way as follows (listed setback depth is the average depth if meandering wall design is approved): A. Jefferson Street - 20 feet B. Avenue 50 - 20 feet The setback requirement applies to all frontage including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall dedicate blanket easements for those purposes. 10. The applicant shall dedicate easements necessary for placement of and access to utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 11. The applicant shall vacate abutter's rights of access to public streets and properties from all frontage along the streets and properties except access points shown on the approved tentative map.. 12. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements or written permission, as appropriate, from owners of any abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments are to occur. 13. If the applicant proposes vacation or abandonment of any existing rights of way or access easements which will diminish access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall provide approved alternate rights of way or access easements to those properties or notarized letters of consent from the property owners 14. The applicant shall cause no easements to be granted or recorded over any portion of this property between the date of approval by the City Council and the date of recording of any final map(s) covering the same portion of the property unless such easements are approved by the City Engineer. FINAL MAPS) AND PARCEL MAP(S) 15. Prior to approval of a final map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete map, as approved by the City's map checker, on storage P:\STAN\tt 29053 ext 2 cc coa.wpd Page 3 of 13 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29053, EXTENSION 42 LA QUINTA JEFFERSON FIFTY ADOPTED: media and in a program format acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu items so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. If the map was not produced in AutoCad or a file format which can be converted to AutoCad, the City Engineer may accept raster -image files of the map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these conditions of approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 16. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and landscape architects, as appropriate. Plans shall be submitted on 24" x 36" media in the categories of "Rough Grading," "Precise Grading," "Streets & Drainage," and "Landscaping." All plans except precise grading plans shall have signature blocks for the City Engineer. Precise grading plans shall have signature blocks for Community Development Director and the Building Official. Plans are not approved for construction until they are signed. "Streets and Drainage" plans shall normally include signals, sidewalks, bike paths, gates and entryways, and parking lots. "Landscaping" plans shall normally include irrigation improvements, landscape lighting and perimeter walls. Plans for improvements not listed above shall be in formats approved by the City Engineer. 17. The City may maintain standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee established by City resolution, the applicant may acquire standard plan and/or detail sheets from the City. 18. When final plans are approved by the City, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete, approved plans on storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu items so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. At the completion of construction and prior to final acceptance of improvements, the applicant shall update the files to reflect as -constructed conditions. If the plans were not converted to AutoCad, plans. produced in AutoCad or a file format which can be the City Engineer may accept raster -image files of the P:\STAN\tt 29053 ext 2 cc coa.wpd Page 4 of 13 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29053, EXTENSION #2 LA QUINTA JEFFERSON FIFTY ADOPTED: IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 19. Depending on the timing of development of the parcels created by this map and the status of off -site improvements at that time, the subdivider may be required to construct improvements, to reimburse the City or others for the cost of the improvements, to secure the cost of the improvements for future construction by others, or a combination of these methods. 20. The applicant shall construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations, or furnish an executed, secured agreement to construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations required by the City prior to approval of a final map or parcel map or issuance of a certificate of compliance for a waived parcel map. For secured agreements, security provided, and the release thereof, shall conform with Chapter 13, LQMC. Improvements to be made or agreed to shall include removal of any existing structures or obstructions which are not part of the proposed improvements. 21. If improvements are secured, the applicant shall provide estimates of improvement costs for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Estimates shall comply with the schedule of unit costs adopted by City resolution or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's schedule, estimates shall meet the approval of the City Engineer. Estimates for utilities and other improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies. Security is not required for telephone, gas, or T.V. cable improvements. However, development -wide improvements shall not be agendized for final acceptance until the City receives confirmation from the telephone authority that the applicant has met all requirements for telephone service to lots within the development. 22. If improvements are phased with multiple final maps or other administrative approvals (e.g., a Site Development Permit), off -site improvements and common improvements (e.g., retention basins, perimeter walls & landscaping, gates) shall be constructed or secured prior to approval of the first phase unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each phase shall be completed and satisfied prior to completion of homes or occupancy of permanent buildings within the phase and subsequent phases unless a construction phasing plan is approved by the City Engineer. 23. If the applicant fails to construct improvements or satisfy obligations in a timely manner or as specified in an approved phasing plan or in an improvement 35i P:\STAN\tt 29053 ext 2 cc coa.wpd Page 5 of 13 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29053, EXTENSION 42 LA QUINTA JEFFERSON FIFTY ADOPTED: agreement, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 24. The applicant's obligations for portions of the required improvements may, at the City's option, be satisfied by participation in a major thoroughfare improvement program if this development becomes subject to such a program. GRADING 25. This development shall comply with Chapter 8.11 of the LQMC (Flood Hazard Regulations). If any portion of any proposed building lot in the development is located within or immediately adjacent to a flood hazard area as identified on the City's Flood Insurance Rate Maps, the development shall be graded to ensure that all building pads, including basement and garage areas, are above the level of the project flood. Prior to issuance of building permits for lots which are so located, the applicant shall receive Conditional Letters of Map Revision based on Fill (CLOMR/F) from FEMA. Prior to final acceptance by the City of subdivision improvements, the applicant shall have received final LOMR/Fs for all such lots. 26. The applicant shall furnish a preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report and a grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer. The grading plan shall conform with the recommendations of the soils report and be certified as adequate by a soils engineer or engineering geologist. The plan must be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. A statement shall appear on final maps (if any are required of this development) that a soils report has been prepared pursuant to Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code. 27. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 28. The applicant shall endeavor to minimize differences in elevation at abutting properties and between separate tracts and lots within this development. Building pad elevations on contiguous lots shall not differ by more than three feet except for lots within a tract or parcel map, but not sharing common street frontage, where the differential shall not exceed five feet. If compliance with this requirement is impractical, the City will consider and may approve alternatives which minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 29. Prior to occupation of the project site for construction purposes, the applicant shall submit and receive approval of a fugitive dust control plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. The Applicant shall furnish security, in J i P:\STAN\tt 29053 ext 2 cc coa.wpd t,41 ti Page 6 of 13 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29053, EXTENSION 42 LA QUINTA JEFFERSON FIFTY ADOPTED: a form acceptable to the city, in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the provisions of the permit. 30. The applicant shall maintain graded, undeveloped land to prevent wind and water erosion of soils. The land shall be planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. 31. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide building pad certifications stamped and signed by a civil engineer or surveyor. The certifications shall list approved pad elevations, actual elevations, and the difference between the two, if any. The data shall be organized by lot number and shall be listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03 and the following: 32. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries, levels or frequencies in any area outside the development. 33. Stormwater falling on site during the 24-hotir peak period 100-year storm (the design storm) shall be retained within the development unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. The design storm shall be either the 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 34. Stormwater shall normally be retained in common retention basins. Individual -lot basins or other retention schemes may be approved by the City Engineer for lots 21/2 acres in size or larger or where the use of common retention is impracticable. If individual -lot retention is approved, the applicant shall meet the individual -lot retention provisions of Chapter 13.24, LQMC. 35. Storm flow in excess of retention capacity shall be routed through a designated, unimpeded overflow outlet to the historic drainage relief route. 36. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be retained on site or passed through to the overflow outlet. 37. Retention facility design shall be based on site -specific percolation data which shall be submitted for checking with the retention facility plans. The design percolation rate shall not exceed two inches per hour. ; 013 P:\STAN\tt 29053 ext 2 cc coa.wpd Page 7 of 13 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29053, EXTENSION #2 LA QUINTA JEFFERSON FIFTY ADOPTED: 38. Retention basin slopes shall not exceed 3:1. Maximum retention depth shall be six feet for common basins and two feet for individual -lot retention. 39. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. In residential developments, nuisance water shall be disposed of in a trickling sand filter and leachfield approved by the City Engineer. The sand filter and leechfield shall be designed to contain surges of 3 gph/1,000 sq. ft. (of landscape area) and infiltrate 5 gpd/1,000 sq. ft. 40. In developments for which security will be provided by public safety entities (e.g., the La Quinta Safety Department or the Riverside County Sheriff's Department), retention basins shall be visible from adjacent street(s). No fence or wall shall be constructed around basins unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 41. If the applicant proposes discharge of stormwater directly or indirectly to the La Quinta Evacuation Channel or the Whitewater Drainage Channel, the applicant and, subsequently, the Homeowners' Association shall be responsible for any sampling and testing of the development's effluent which may be required under the City's NPDES Permit or other City- or area -wide pollution prevention program, and for any other obligations and/or expenses which may arise from such discharge. If such discharge is approved for this development, the applicant shall make provisions in the CC&Rs for meeting these potential obligations. UTILITIES 42. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electrical vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for aesthetic as well as practical purposes. 43. Existing and proposed wire and cable utilities within or adjacent to the proposed development shall be installed underground. Power lines exceeding 34.5 kv are exempt from this requirement. 44. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. The applicant shall provide certified reports of trench compaction for approval of the City Engineer. 3,5 014 P:\STAN\tt 29053 ext 2 cc coa.wpd Page 8 of 13 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29053, EXTENSION #2 LA QUINTA JEFFERSON FIFTY ADOPTED: STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 45. The City is contemplating adoption of a major thoroughfare improvement program. Any property within this development which has not been subdivided in accordance with this tentative map 60 days after the program is in effect shall be subject to the program as determined by the City. 46. The applicant shall install the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. (Public street improvements shall conform with the City's General Plan in effect at the time of construction.) A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) - Construct 51-foot half of a 102-foot improvement (travel lanes plus median) plus a 6-foot meandering sidewalk. 2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) - Construct 38-foot half of a 76-foot improvement (travel lanes plus median) plus a 6-foot meandering sidewalk. 3) Jefferson Street/Avenue 50 Intersection - Responsibility for 17.5% of the cost of signal improvements plus a proportionate share, with the remainder of the specific plan area, of any other improvements or modifications which may be warranted by the timing and traffic loadings imposed by development of the specific plan area. 4) Avenue 50/Lot I Intersection - Responsibility for 50% of the cost of signal and other intersection improvements. This responsibility may be shared with the adjacent property on this side of the street if that property is allowed and utilizes shared access to this intersection. 5) In the event any of the above improvements are constructed by the City prior to the applicant recording a final map, the applicant shall reimburse the City, at the time the final map is approved by the City Council for the cost of that portion of the improvements constructed by the City that are required by these conditions of approval. B. ON -SITE STREETS AND CULS DE SAC (Private) 1) Collector Street - Divided sections shall have 20-foot-wide opposing travel lanes with an 18-foot median. The remainder shall have a forty -foot travel width. P:\STAN\tt 29053 ext 2 cc coa.wpd Page 9 of 13 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29053, EXTENSION #2 LA QUINTA JEFFERSON FIFTY ADOPTED: 2) Cul de sac Streets - Thirty six-foot travel width plus additional for turn knuckle. 3) Cul de sac curb radius: thirty eight -feet. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, turn knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, and other features contained in the approved construction plans may warrant additional street widths as determined by the City Engineer. 47. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Jefferson Street at Lot I - Right & left in/right out. B. Avenue 50 at Lot I - Full -turn access (with signal). C. Connection of Lot I with Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 29052 - As granted by the owner of that property and approved by the City Engineer 48. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians, street name signs, and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 49. The applicant may be required to extend improvements beyond development boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements. 50. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC, adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, and as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 51. Street right of way geometry for knuckle turns and corner cut -backs shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805 respectively unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 52. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations which convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue for street sweeping. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to normal curbing prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 53. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using Caltrans' design 3 61 procedure (20-year life) and site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated P:\STAN\tt 29053 ext 2 cc coa.wpd u16) Page 10 of 13 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29053, EXTENSION #2 LA QUINTA JEFFERSON FIFTY ADOPTED: traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows (or approved equivalents for alternate materials): Residential & Parking Areas 3.0" a.c./4.50" a.b. Collector 4.0"/5.00" Secondary Arterial 4.0"/6.00" Primary Arterial 4.5"/6.00" Major Arterial 5.5"/6.50" - -, - -ii , _ _ _ _ a I Lain:: _ a emi 55. The City will conduct final inspections of homes and other habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the tract or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPING 56. The applicant shall provide landscaping in required setbacks, retention basins, common lots, and park areas. Mounding of public street perimeter setback areas shall be provided per Zoning Code requirements where feasible. 57. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit plans for approval by the Community Development Department prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking is complete, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner prior to submitting for signature by the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 36`' i✓� 17 P:\STAN\tt 29053 ext 2 cc coa.wpd Page 11 of 13 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29053, EXTENSION #2 LA QUINTA JEFFERSON FIFTY ADOPTED: 58. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. PUBLIC SERVICES 59. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements if and as required by Sunline Transit and/or the City Engineer. QUALITY ASSURANCE 60. The applicant shall employ construction quality assurance measures which meet the approval of the City Engineer. 61. The applicant shall employ or retain qualified civil engineers, geotechnical engineers, surveyors, or other appropriate professionals to provide sufficient construction supervision to be able to furnish and sign accurate record drawings. 62. The applicant shall arrange and bear the cost of measurement, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program but required by the City as evidence that construction materials and methods comply with plans and specifications. 63. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all public improvement and private street plans which were signed by the City Engineer. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the CAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City to reflect as -constructed conditions. MAINTENANCE 64. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all on -site and perimeter setback improvements. This shall include formation of a homeowner's association or other enforceable arrangement acceptable to the City. The applicant shall maintain public improvements until expressly released from that responsibility by the City. z_►13 P:\STAN\tt 29053 ext 2 cc coa.wpd Page 12 of 13 RESOLUTION 2002- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29053, EXTENSION #2 LA QUINTA JEFFERSON FIFTY ADOPTED: FEES AND DEPOSITS 65. The applicant shall pay the City's established fees for plan checking and construction inspection. Fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan checking and permits. 66. Prior to approval of a final map or completion of any approval process for modification of boundaries of the property or lots subject to these conditions, the applicant shall process a reapportionment of any bonded assessment(s) against the property and pay the cost of the reapportionment. 67. Prior to issuance of a grading permit or any earth moving activities, applicant shall pay a fringe -toed lizard mitigation fee of $600.00 per acre to the City of La Quinta. 68. Prior to final map approval by the City Council, the property owner/developer shall comply with the Parkland Dedication requirements by payment of in -lieu fees as set forth in Section 13.48 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. FIRE MARSHAL 69. Fire hydrants in accordance with CVWD Standard W-33 shall be located at each street intersection and spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction, with no portion of any lot frontage not more than 165 feet from a fire hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 gpm for a 2-hour duration at 20 psi residual. 70. Blue dot reflectors shall be placed in the street 8 inches from the centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 71. Prior to issuance recordation of final map, applicant/developer shall furnish one blue line copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review/approval. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered Civil Engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department". 72. The required water system, including fire hydrants will be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. (?13 P:\STAN\tt 29053 ext 2 cc coa.wpd Page 13 of 13 ATTACHMENT #3 Planning Commission Minutes June 25, 2002 7. There being no questions of the applicant and no other public mment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened the matter up for Commission disc sion. 8. Commissigner Robbins asked that Condition #41 be corrected to read, "fully prinkled". 9. There being no rther discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners utler/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-0 approving Site Development Permit 2002- 741, subject to findin and conditions as amended: A. Condition #33: Sigto exceed size of Ross Dress for Less sign. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Bu r, Kirk, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. ---� B. Tentative Tract Map 29053, Extension #2; a request of La Quinta Jefferson Fifty for approval of a second one year extension of time for a tentative tract map which creates 103 single family lots on 33 + acres located at northwest of the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 50. 1. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked where there had been grading at the site. Staff stated they have been allowed to do so. 3. Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Mike Smith, Warner Engineering, stated the purpose of the extension is to allow time to record the second and third phases. They would like to request a change to Condition #56 to change the wording from "berming" to "mounding". Staff stated that was acceptable. .13 Ei G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\6-25-02.wpd 3 I 1 � �) Planning Commission Minutes June 25, 2002 4. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion. 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-070 approving Tentative Tract Map 29053, Extension #2, as submitted. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. C. Environmental Assessment 2002-455, General Plan Amendment 2002- 087 and Tentative Tract Map 30521; a request of Lido Equity Partners for C tification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact r an Environmental Assessment, change of General Plan Land Use desi nation from Neighborhood Commercial to Low Density Residential or ten acres, and the subdivision of 43.6 acres into 147 single family nd other miscellaneous lots located at the northeast corner of Washinaton Street and Miles Avenue. 1. Commissio er Robbins excused himself due to a potential conflict of interest arid left the dias. 2. Chairman Abels pened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the s aff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Develop ent Department. 3. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Kirk asked 'f the changes in the circulation pattern are due to the nearby resid ts. Staff stated yes. 4. Commissioner Tyler asked why he lots could not be graded to the same height as the existing lots at abut this project on the east between Bradford Circle and For s Circle. Also, did a sound study require the sound wall. Staffs ated the study was done in compliance with the environmental st dy. Commissioner Tyler asked about the height restrictions on Mi s Avenue. Staff stated the height limit was 22 feet within 150 fee Commissioner Tyler asked why the gate off Via Sevilla could not b constructed earlier than anticipated (Phase 4). 1?3 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\6-25-02.wpd 4 T4ht 4 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing on: 1) Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-455; 2) General Plan Amendment 2002-087, a Request for Change of General Plan Land Use Designation from Neighborhood Commercial to Low Density Residential for Ten Acres; and 3) Tentative Tract Map 30521, a Request for Subdivision of 43.6 ± Acres into 147 Single Family and Other Miscellaneous Lots Located at the Northeast Corner of Washington Street and Miles Avenue. Applicant: Lido Equity Partners AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-455, subject to the Mitigation Monitoring Program. 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment 2002-087. 3. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract 30521, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. '368 p:\stan\tt 30521 cc rpt.WPD BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Project History The RM (Medium Density) zoned site is vacant and consists of rolling sand dunes and typical desert shrubs. A previous Tentative Tract Map 23971 was approved in March, 1989, for 227 single family lots on this site, along with the property immediately to the north (Attachment 1). The first phase of 76 lots (La Quinta Del Oro and Santiago) on the northern portion of the map was recorded in 1990, and is presently being completed by a third builder. The allowable time extensions to record the final map was approved for the remaining property, which consists of the current subject site. The time extensions expired in March, 1994. The 43.67 net acre property is presently zoned Medium Density Residential (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre). The General Plan shows ten acres of Neighborhood Commercial at the intersection of Washington Street and Miles Avenue, with the balance of the subject property designated Low Density Residential. The current zoning permits the Tentative Tract Map at the density proposed. A zone change from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential will be initiated by the City of La Quinta at a later date. Environmental Assessment 2002-455 was prepared for this General Plan Amendment and Tentative Tract Map in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. The Community Development Director has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and, therefore, recommends that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact be certified. Surrounding zoning and land uses consist of the following: North: RM / existing and under construction single family residences South: RM and TC / vacant City -owned land East: RL / single family residences West: vacant land in the city of Indian Wells Project Request The applicant has requested removal of the Neighborhood Commercial General Plan Land Use designation and replacement with Low Density Residential. This will permit the residential development as proposed. The applicants are proposing 147 single family lots on 43.67 acres of land (3.37 dwelling units per acre) (Attachment 2). The lots vary in size from 7,283 to 17,001 square feet, with an average size of 8,737 square feet. The prevalent lot width is 70 feet wide and 115 feet deep. 361 p:\stan\tt 30521 cc rpt.WPD The tract is laid out with a main stem road parallel and next to Washington Street and Miles Avenue. Cul-de-sac and loop streets are provided from this stem road. A private gated access is shown near the east boundary to Miles Avenue. The tract's other off -site access is a gated private street access on the north to Via Sevilla near the west end. Via Sevilla connects to Washington Street at its west termination. Previous street connections under the expired tentative tract map to Bradford Circle on the east and Via Coronado on the north have been abandoned. The proposal provides a cul-de-sac bulb at the end of existing Bradford Circle, with Via Coronado to the north connecting in an "L" shape with the existing Forbes Circle to the east. Existing Via Caliente dead -ends into the subject property near the north end. Existing Via Caliente was part of the original subdivision and was intended to be extended into the subject property. It is now proposed that a cul-de-sac bulb be constructed onto the east end of Via Caliente with six new residential lots created around the bulb. These six lots will only have vehicular access to Via Caliente in La Quinta Del Oro and, therefore, will not be a part of this project. A Coachella Valley Water District water well site is shown at the southeast corner of the property adjacent to Miles Avenue. Six open space/retention basins are scattered throughout the west and south portions of the property. The largest basins are at the southeast and northwest corners of the project site. In addition to the perimeter streets (Washington Street and Miles Avenue) parkway and 20 foot deep landscaped setback, a 15 foot landscape area is provided next to the parallel interior private street. Within this 15 foot setback area, the tentative tract map shows a meandering perimeter block wall. Four phases are proposed for build -out of the project, with the first consisting of the Miles Avenue frontage immediately adjacent to the street entry and lots along the east portion of the site. The last phase is the northwest portion of the property, including access to Via Sevilla. Proposed finish pad elevations adjacent to existing residences around the perimeter will be even or lower than the neighbors', except on the east perimeter where the proposed finish pads for Lots 57 to 64 will be approximately 1.7 to .7 feet higher than the neighbors'. These differences are based on the closest outside (front or back yard) grades submitted by the applicants. Public Notice This Tentative Tract Map extension application was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on July 5, 2002. All property owners within 500 feet of the site were mailed a copy of the Public Hearing notice as required by the Subdivision Ordinance of the La Quinta Charter and Municipal Code. As of this writing, no written comments have been received. 3r ,3 3 p:\stan\tt 30521 cc rpt.WPD Public Agency Review All applicable agency comments received have been made part of the Conditions of Approval for this case. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed this request at its meeting of June 25, 2002. The Commission unanimously adopted Resolutions 2002-071 through 073, recommending approval of this request, subject to findings and amended conditions. Due to concerns from neighbors who spoke at the hearing, the Commission added Conditions 87, 88 and 89 to address prohibition of two story units, traffic calming in the new tract and property line walls between new and existing lots, respectively. Condition 36 was amended to require pad grades to be no more than one foot higher than existing grades (Attachment 3). FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The findings needed to approve this request can be met, as noted in the attached Resolutions. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-455, subject to the Mitigation Monitoring Program, and Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment 2002-087, and Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract Map 30521, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-455 and approving General Plan Amendment 2002-087 and Tentative Tract Map 3052; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, ergry Her an, Community Development Director i p`\stan\tt 30521 cc rpt.WPD Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Location Map 2. Tentative Tract Map exhibit (Large for City Council only) 3. Planning Commission minutes for the meeting of June 25, 2002 37 p:\stan\tt 30521 cc rpt.WPD V `� RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CASE NO.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2002-455 LIDO EQUITY PARTNERS WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared collectively for General Plan Amendment 2002-087 and Tentative Tract 30521 (collectively "the Project"), located on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Miles Avenue, more particularly described as: APN's: 604-032-009, -018, and -021 WHEREAS, the City has prepared the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, section 15000 et. seq., ("CEQA Guidelines"); and WHEREAS, the City mailed notice of its intention to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration in compliance with Pubic Resources Code Section 21092 on June 28, 2002 to landowners within 500 feet of the Project Site and to all public entities entitled to notice under CEQA, which notice also included a notice of the public hearing before the City Council on July 16, 2002; and WHEREAS, the City published a notice of its intention to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and associated Initial Study in the Desert Sun on July 5, 2002, and further caused the notice to be filed with the Riverside County Clerk in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, during the comment period, the City received no comment letters on the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, the La Quinta Planning Commissioh on June 25, 2002, did consider the Project and recommended to the City Council certification of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on July 16, 2002, on the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, during which public hearing testimony and other evidence was received. 373 P:\STAN\ea 2002-455 cc res.wpd J b Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2002-455 Adopted: Page 2 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council, as follows: SECTION 1: The above recitations are true and correct and are adopted as the Findings of the Council. SECTION 2 The City Council finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared and processed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines and the City's implementation procedures. The City Council has independently reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and finds that it adequately describes and addresses the environmental effects of the Project, and that, based upon the Initial Study, the comments received thereon, and the entire record of proceeding for this Project, there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record that there may be significant adverse environmental effects as a result of the Project. The mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated into the Project and these measures mitigate any potential significant effect to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects will occur as a result of this Project. SECTION 3: The Project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2002-455. SECTION 4: The Project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. SECTION 5: There is no evidence before the City that the Project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. SECTION 6: The Project does not have the potential to achieve short- term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. SECTION 7: The Project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed 37,1 P:\STAN\ea 2002-455 cc res.wpd c� Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2002-455 Adopted: Page 3 development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the Project. SECTION 8: The Project will not have the environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. SECTION 9: The City Council has fully considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and the comments received thereon. SECTION 10: The Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Council. SECTION 11: The location of the documents which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council decision is based is the La Quinta City Hall, Community Development Department, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253, and the custodian of those records is Jerry Herman, Community Development Director. SECTION 12: A Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby adopted pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21081.6 in order to assure compliance with the mitigation measures during Project implementation. SECTION 13: Based upon the Initial Study and the entire record of proceedings, the Project has no potential for adverse effects on wildlife as that term is defined in Fish and Game Code § 711.2. SECTION 14: The City Council has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 California Code of Regulations 753.5(d). SECTION 15: The Mitigated Negative Declaration is hereby certified and adopted. SECTION 16: The Community Development Director shall cause to be filed with the County Clerk a Notice of Determination pursuant to CEQA Guideline § 15075(a). 37 P:\STAN\ea 2002-455 cc res.wpd J u 8 Resolution 2002- Environmental Assessment 2002-455 Adopted: Page 4 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16th day of July, 2002, by the vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 37f► P:\STAN\ea 2002-455 cc res.wpd V Cl j Resolution 2002- Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Environmental Assessment 2002-455, General Plan Amendment 2002-087, Tentative Tract Map 30521 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Stan Sawa, 760-777-7125 4. Project Location: Northeast corner of Washington Street and Miles Avenue 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Lido Equity Partners. 111 West Ocean Boulevard, #1550 Long Beach, CA 91790 6. General Plan Designation: Current: Neighborhood Commercial and Low Density Residential Proposed: Low Density Residential 7. Zoning: Current: Neighborhood Commercial and Medium Density Residential Proposed: Medium Density Residential 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) The General Plan Amendment is required to allow single family residential lots in the Low Density Residential land use category. The Tentative Tract Map is proposed to subdivide 43.81 acres into 147 residential lots and lettered lots for streets and retention basins. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings. North: Single Family Residential units South: Vacant, designated for Tourist Commercial West: Vacant land East: Single Family Residential units 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) 3 7' Not applicable P:\STAN\LidoEACkIst.WPD '2 1 I Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology and Soils Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. '� b • e5�- 4� Signature PASTAN\LidoEACkIst.WPD 2 June 7, 2002 Date C LN Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project - specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analysis are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. The analysis of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance P:\STAN\LidoEACkIst.WPD 3 379 �1� Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: 1. AESTHETICS: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (General Plan EIR p. III-159 ff.) b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (General Plan EIR p. III-159 ff.) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials) AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES:. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Dept. Of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a► Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (General Plan EIR p. III-21 ff.) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to nonagricultural use? (Aerial photographs) III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact X X X X FN X 0 X 9 X P:\STAN\LidoEACklst.WPD 3 n 4 _ t;13 d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Project Description) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Project Description) IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (General Plan MEA, p. 73 ff.) b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (General Plan MEA, p. 73 ff.) c) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) Either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?(General Plan MEA, p. 73 ff.) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? (General Plan MEA, p. 73 ff.) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (La Quinta Municipal Code; General Plan) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?(General Plan MEA, p. 73 ff.) V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources? (Letter Archaeological Associates, May 2002) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resources (i.e., an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest or best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)? (Letter Archaeological Associates, May 2002) P:\STAN\LidoEACkIst.WPD X X X X X X 124 Al c1 Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? (Master Environmental Assessment, Exhibit 5.9) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (Letter Archaeological Associates, May 2002) VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a► Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (General Plan EIR p. III-61 ff.) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (General Plan EIR p. III-61 ff.) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (General Plan EIR p. III-61 ff.) iv) Landslides? (General Plan MEA p. 96 ff) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (General Plan MEA p. 96 ff) c) Be located on a geological unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (General Plan MEA p. 96 ff) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (General Plan MEA p. 96 ff) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (General Plan MEA p. 96 ff) VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Geocheck Report, EDR, April 2002) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Geocheck Report, EDR, April 2002) c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Geocheck Report, EDR, April 2002) P:\STAN\LidoEACkIst.WPD R X X X X X X X X X X X X 38' A d) Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Geocheck Report, EDR, April 2002) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip; would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (General Plan MEA p. 94 ff) h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildlands fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) Vill. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems to control? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) f) Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Master Environmental Assessment Exhibit 6.5) X X X X X X 383 P:\STAN\LidoEACkIst.WPD 7 J v10 g) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would X impede or redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment Exhibit 6.6) IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Project Description) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purposes of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan p. 18 ff.) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 73 ff.) X. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) XI. NOISE: Would the project result in: a► Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (Revised Acoustical Analysis Report, Eilar & Associates, June 2002) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (Revised Acoustical Analysis Report, Eilar & Associates, June 2002) c) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (Revised Acoustical Analysis Report, Eilar & Associates, June 2002) d) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Application materials) X X X X 9 0 X 381,1 P:\STAN\LidoEACkIst.WPD 8 A 7 e► For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project X area to excessive levels? (General Plan land use map) XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (General Plan, p. 9 ff.) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Application Materials) XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) Police protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) Schools? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) XIV. RECREATION: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application Materials) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application Materials) XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a X X X X X X X 051 X 385 P:\STAN\LidoEACkIst.WPD t 9 �: 1 a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan p. 22 ff.) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (General Plan p. 22 ff.) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Application materials) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Application Materials) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Application Materials) g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Application Materials) XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a► Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) d) Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (General Plan MEA, p. 46 ff.) P:\STAN\LidoEACklst.WPD 10 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 386 J13 XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSIS. VIA X X X Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. No earlier analysis were used in this review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. See attached Addendum. SOURCES: P:\STAN\LidoEACkIst.WPD 1 1 J 8 n 0 Lj i- Master Environmental Assessment, City of La Quinta General Plan 2002. General Plan, City of La Quinta, 2002. General Plan EIR, City of La Quinta, 2002. SCAQMD CEQA Handbook. City of La Quinta Municipal Code Revised Acoustical Analysis Report, Douglas Eilar & Associates, June 4, 2002 Geocheck Report, Environmental Data Resources, Inc., April 23, 2002 Archaeological Associates, Letter dated May 1, 2002 383 P:\STAN\LidoEACkIst.WPD 12 `� Resolution 2002- Addendum for Environmental Assessment 2002-455 I. d) The area in which the project will be built is generally developed in single family homes, and generates limited amounts of light. The Indian Wells Tennis Garden, located west and north of the project site, can generate considerable light when evening events occur there. There is sufficient distance, however, between the project site and this land use to lower the potential impacts to a less than significant level. The project itself will generate light, but as a single family subdivision, this impact will be less than significant. III. a) The primary source of air pollution in the City is the automobile. The proposed General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone and Tentative Tract Map will result in 147 single family homes at build out. These homes are likely to generate a total of 1,407 trips per day at build out'. Based on this trip generation, the proposed project will generate the following pollutants. Running Exhaust Emissions (pounds/day) PM10 PM10 PM10 CO ROC NOx Exhaust Brakes Tires 50 mph 36.34 1.4 7.45 -- 0.16 0.16 Daily Threshold 550 75 100 150 Based on 1,407 trips/day and average trip length of 5 miles, using EMFAC7G Model provided by California Air Resources Board. Assumes catalytic light autos at 75°F, year 2005. * Operational thresholds provided by SCAQMD for assistance in determining the significance of a project and the need for an EIR. The proposed project will not exceed any threshold for the generation of moving emissions, as established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District in determining the need for an EIR. The impacts to air quality relating to chemical pollution are not expected to be significant. III. c) The Coachella Valley is a severe non -attainment area for PM10 (particulate "Trip Generation, Sixth Edition," Institute of Transportation Engineers, based on Single Family Detached (210) category. 389 P:\STAN\LidoAddendum.WPD matter of 10 microns or smaller). The construction of the proposed project has the potential to generate dust, which could contribute to PM10 concentrations in the Valley. In order to control PM10, the City has imposed standards and requirements on development to control dust. The applicant will be required to submit a PM10 Management Plan prior to initiation of any earth moving activity at the site. Further, the SCAQMD has drafted a revision to the state Implementation Plan for PM10 which includes a number of potential mitigation measures. The adoption of this document is expected in June 2002. The potential impacts associated with PM10 can be mitigated by the measures below. 1. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. 2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation. 3. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. Cut and fill quantities will be balanced on site. 5. Any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. 6. Watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on -going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. 7. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. Parkway landscaping on Washington Street and Miles Avenue, as well as the perimeter wall for this project, shall be installed with the first phase of development. 8. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean up of construction -related dirt on approach routes to the site. 9. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. 10. Should construction begin after the adoption of the revised Implementation Plan for PM10, the measures included in that plan shall be implemented for this project. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, the impacts to air 390 P:\STAN\UdoAddendum.WPD f) J 3 quality from buildout will not be significant IV. a) The proposed project occurs within the boundaries of the fee area for the Coachella Valley Fringe -toed lizard. The project proponent will be required to pay the required fee prior to issuance of building permits. This payment will serve to mitigate the potential impacts to this species. V. b) A cultural resource survey was completed for the proposed project2. Both a records search and field survey were conducted. No cultural resources were found. The study recommends, however, that the following mitigation measure be required: 1. An archaeologist shall be present on site during all grubbing and earth moving activities. The archaeologist shall be required to submit to the Community Development Department, for review and approval, a written report on all activities on the site prior to occupancy of the first building on the site. VI. a) i) & ii) The proposed project lies in a Zone IV groundshaking zone. The property, as with the rest of the City, will be subject to significant ground movement in the event of a major earthquake. Structures on the site will be required to meet the City's and the State's standards for construction, which include Uniform Building Code requirements for seismic zones. The City Engineer will require the preparation of site -specific geotechnical analysis in conjunction with the submittal of grading plans. This requirement will ensure that impacts from ground shaking are reduced to a less than significant level. VIII. b) The Coachella Valley Water District provides domestic water to the subject property. All homes built on the project area will be required to implement the City's standards for water conserving plumbing fixtures and on -site retention, which both aid in reducing the potential impacts to groundwater. The proposed tract will also meet the requirements of the City's water -conserving landscaping ordinance. These standards will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. VIII. d) The proposed project will result in homes, roads and driveways on a parcel which is currently vacant. The City Engineer will require that all phases of the tract retain the 100 year 24 hour storm on -site. This will control the amount of runoff which exits the site during a storm. The project's drainage plan will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of grading 2 Letter dated May 1, 2002, Archaeological Associates. 39t J ,, 4 P:\STAN\LidoAddendum.WPD XI. a) permits. These standards will reduce the potential impacts associated with surface water to a less than significant level. The proposed project occurs in an area of the City subject to high noise levels due to traffic. A noise analysis was completed for the proposed project3. The study found that without mitigation, 50% of the lots on the proposed site would be significantly impacted by noise. In order to mitigate the potential impacts, the study recommends the following mitigation measures, which will be implemented: 1. A 6 foot wall shall be built on all sides of the proposed project. In addition, the wall along the northern property line of lots 140 and 141 shall be constructed on top of a 4 foot high berm. 2. For all homes which face or have direct exposure to Washington Street or Miles Avenue an acoustical analysis shall be submitted with building permits which demonstrates that the interior noise levels in the homes will not exceed 45 dBA CNEL. The acoustical analysis shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of building permits for these lots. XI. c) The construction of the proposed project will generate noise from construction equipment and activities. Existing homes occur adjacent to the project site on the north and east sides. Homes are considered sensitive receptors to noise, and the construction at the site could have a negative impact. In order to reduce these potential impacts, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1. All internal combustion equipment operating within 500 feet of any occupied residential unit shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers. 2. All stationary construction equipment (e.g. generators and compressors) shall be located in the southeast corner of the site. 3. Construction activities shall be limited to the hours prescribed in the La Quinta Municipal Code. XIII. a) The proposed project will be served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, s "Revised Acoustical Analysis Report," prepared by Douglas Eilar & Associates, June 4, 2002. P:\STAN\LidoAddendum.WPD under City contract. Buildout of the proposed project will generate property tax which will help offset the costs of added police and fire services. The project proponent will be required to pay the state -mandated school fees to mitigate potential impacts to schools. To offset the potential impacts on City traffic systems, the project will be required to participate in the City's Impact Fee Program. Site development is not expected to have a significant impact on municipal services or facilities. 393 P:\STAN\LidoAddendum.WPD �, O pi N O W ai W H d A U� �WAW aU W 00 UU 7ti A Cd 73 A a AC'A V vUi s a bq � Cd o O bQ 0 O .D O O (J► SUS Cd U U �U U on O U O O 1+6UE x O +' wz as o15 il t: Cd cd w w bo be w U U U GG U A m m U N z 0-4 � r o) 0 o Zw �0. a o Cd a Q bo UO Cd cSUl cd Cd N W E-� d A U� A W ox U� 03 •o H ° U � � Cd > o E 0-0 Cd A O� 0 z 0 zcl A l o � U A z O W � F., drA U x Z �a O bo xW a o L U o Cd W F+ d A U� A a� �W ox U� o � F ° C4 + Q. (n Q. ul by �. z cl s A a A A A O }' 0 Cd U A m GQ � $-4 � i o z 1401rA o U a o r of .. W o L 0 o Cd 0 x WrA—cd g {o o •U ��. O o rA �Cd0-4 o } O C" ✓�i \O c�i V] � � O �) w 0 3 9 5 ii 0 z RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL CASE NO.: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2002-087 LIDO EQUITY PARTNERS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 25th day of June, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing and adopted Resolution 2002-072, recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 2002-087, at the request of LIDO EQUITY PARTNERS for approval of a change in Land Use Designation from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Low Density Residential (LDR) for 10 acres of a 43.6 + acre site for property located on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Miles Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 16th day of July, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the General Plan Amendment and did consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for 10 acres of a 43.6 + acre site for property located on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Miles Avenue, more particularly described as: A PORTION OF APN 604-032-009 WHEREAS, said General Plan Amendment application has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-68), in that the La Quinta Community Development Department has completed Environmental Assessment 2002-455, and as a result a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact has been certified; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings of approval to justify approving said General Plan Amendment: The proposed General Plan Amendment is internally consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan not being amended in that the General Plan Amendment results in promoting a residential character. 3 (i P:\STAN\gpa 2002-087 cc res.frm Resolution 2002- General Plan Amendment 2002-087 Adopted: Page 2 2. Approval of the General Plan Amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare in that the resulting project provides substantial setbacks, is well designed and landscaped, and will comply with all applicable City, County, State and Federal requirements. 3. The General Plan Amendment is compatible with adjacent properties in that the resulting Medium Density Residential project is similar in nature with surrounding single family residences. 4. The General Plan Amendment is suitable and appropriate for the property in that it will allow development of single family residences in conjunction with those proposed on adjacent land. 5. Approval of the General Plan Amendment is warranted because there is adequate commercially designated properties within one-half mile to the south. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does approve General Plan Amendment 2002-087 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16th day of July, 2002, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PEI A, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 397 P:\STAN\gpa 2002-087 cc res.frm Resolution 2002- General Plan Amendment 2002-087 Adopted: Page 2 ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON , City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 393 P:\STAN\gpa 2002-087 cc res.frm NC TO LDR NC TO LDR CASE MAP CASE No. G PA 2002-087 LIDO EQUITY PARTNERS EXHIBIT "A" ORTH SCALE: 3 NTS 99 ,j32 RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SUBDIVISION OF 43.6 ACRES INTO 147 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND MISCELLANEOUS LOTS CASE NO.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30521 LIDO EQUITY PARTNERS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 16T" day of July, 2002, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of LIDO EQUITY PARTNERS for subdivision of 43.6 acres into 147 residential lots and golf, common area, street, and miscellaneous lots, generally located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Miles Avenue, more particularly described as: A.P.N. 604-032-009, -18, AND -21 WHEREAS, said Tentative Tract Map has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-63) in that the La Quinta Community Development Department has completed Environmental Assessment 2002-455. The Community Development Director has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been considered and certified by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following Mandatory Findings of Approval to justify approval of said Tentative Tract Map 30521: 1 . The Map and its design are consistent with the General Plan with approval of General Plan Amendment 2002-087 in that its lots are in conformance with applicable goals, policies, and development standards, such as lot size and will provide adequate infrastructure and public utilities. 2. The design of the subdivision or its proposed improvements are not likely to create environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure wildlife or their habitat because mitigation measures and conditions have been imposed. 3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed types of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because urban improvements are existing or will be installed based on applicable Local, State, and Federal requirements and Conditions of Approval will be imposed. 400 P:\STAN\tt 30521 cc reso.wpd J.1 ') 3 Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: Page: 2 4. The design of the subdivision and the proposed types of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property within the subdivision in that street connections and cul-de- sac bulbs will be provided with the project to surrounding streets. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 25T" day of June, 2002, adopt Resolution 2002-073, recommending approval of this Tentative Tract Map, subject to conditions; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does approve Tentative Tract Map 30521 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 16T" day of July, 2002, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PEIVA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 40.1 P:\STAN\tt 30521 cc reso.wpd Resolution 2002- Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: Page: 2 JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 400 P:\STAN\tt 30521 cc reso.wpd Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: July 16, 2002 GENERAL 1 . The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Tract Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Tract Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code § § 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at www:la-quinta.org. 3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain the necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) • SunLine Transit Agency The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 4. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water), LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08- DWQ . 40,3 v0O P:\STAN\tt 30521 pc coa.wpd Printed July 8, 2002 t Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: July 16, 2002 A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs five (5) acres or more of land, or that disturbs less than five (5) acres of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than five (5) acres of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (8.70.020 (Definitions), LQMC): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All of applicant's erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off site grading being done in relation to this project. F. All approved project BMPs shall be maintained in their proper working order throughout the course of construction, and until all improvements have been accepted by the City. 5. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). PROPERTY RIGHTS 6. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate 4 Q•• J 3 P:\STAN\tt 30521 pc coampd Printed July 8, 2002 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: July 16, 2002 or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 7. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street right-of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 8. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Washington Street (Major Arterial Street) - None Required 2) Miles Avenue (Primary Arterial Street) - None Required 3) Via Caliente, Bradford Circle, Forbes Circle and Via Coronado - Local Street, 60 foot Right of Way. 9. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Final Map all private street right-of- ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 10. The private street right-of-ways to be retained for private use required for this development include: A. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Street "A" Entry Street - 81 foot private right of way as shown on the Tentative Map. 2) Street "L" Entry Street - 57 foot private right of way as shown on the Tentative Map. 3) Interior Private Streets: 36-foot travel width within a 37 foot private right of way. B. CUL DE SACS 1) Private Residential Cul-de-sac Use Riverside County Standard 800 for symmetrical Cul De Sacs, or 800A for offset Cul De Sacs, and a 38-foot face of curb radius. 40� A3 P:AS'PAN\tt 30521 pc coa.wpd Printed July 8, 2002 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: July 16, 2002 1 1 . Right-of-way geometry for standard knuckles and property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801, and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 12. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 13. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street right-of- ways shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such right-of-ways, the applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-ways within 60 days of a written request by the City. 14. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. 15. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public right-of- ways as follows: A. Washington Street (Major Arterial) - 20-foot from the Right of way or property line. B. Miles Avenue (Primary Arterial) - 20-foot from the Right of way or property line. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 16. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 17. The applicant shall vacate all abutter's right -of -access to public streets and properties from all frontages along such public streets and properties, excepting those access points shown on the Final Map. 406 J33 P:\STAN\tt 30521 pc coa.wpd Printed July 8, 2002 ' Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: July 16, 2002 18. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 19. When an applicant proposes the vacation, or abandonment, of any existing right-of- way, or access easement, which will diminish the access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall provide an alternate right-of-way or access easement, to those properties, or notarized letters of consent from the affected property owners. 20. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. FINAL MAPS 21. Prior to the City's approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCAD files of the Final Map that was approved by the City's map checker on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. Such files shall be in a standard AutoCAD format so as to be fully retrievable into a basic AutoCAD program. Where a Final Map was not produced in an AutoCAD format, or produced in a file that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept a raster - image file of such Final Map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 22. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans), LQMC. 23. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the City. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to 401 '0 4 1) PASTAN\tt 30521 pc coampd Printed July 8, 2002 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: July 16, 2002 prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. Off -Site Street Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical The street improvement plans shall include permanent traffic control and separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. B. Perimeter Landscape Plan: 1 " = 20' C. On -Site Street Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical D. On -Site Rough Grading Plan: 1 " = 40' Horizontal E. On -Site Precise Grading Plan: 1 " = 30' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. 24. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee, established by City Resolution, the applicant may purchase such standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes from the City. 25. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the AutoCAD files of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall be saved in a standard AutoCAD format so they may be fully retrievable through a basic AutoCAD program. 408 ,.-41. P:ASTAN\tt 30521 pc coa.wpd Printed July 8, 2002 1 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: July 16, 2002 At the completion of construction, and prior to the final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall update the AutoCAD files in order to reflect the as -built conditions. Where the improvement plans were not produced in a standard AutoCAD format, or a file format that can be converted to an AutoCAD format, the City Engineer will accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 26. Prior to the conditional approval of any Final Map, or the issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 27. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Tract Map, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security), LQMC. 28. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 29. When improvements are phased through a "Phasing Plan," all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to 400 P:\STAN\tt 30521 pc coampd Printed July 8, 2002 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: July 16, 2002 the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 30. When improvements are to be secured through a SIA, and prior to any conditional approval of the Final Map by the City Council, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off -site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution, or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit costs shall be approved by the City Engineer. At the time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for conditional approval of the Final Map by the City Council, the applicant shall also submit one copy each of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " reduction of each page of the Final Map, along with a copy of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " Vicinity Map. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. GRADING 31. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 32. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 33. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer or architect, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a qualified engineer, and - 410 A0 P:\STAN\tt 30521 pc coa.wpd Printed July 8, 2002 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: July 16, 2002 C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), LQMC. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on the Final Map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. 34. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 35. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 36. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. 37. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. Building pad elevations on contiguous interior lots shall not differ by more than three feet except for lots that do not share a common street frontage, where the differential shall not exceed five feet. Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 38. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus three tenths of a foot from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Staff for a substantial conformance finding review. 411 4Ii P:ASTAN\tt 30521 pc coamwpd Printed July 8, 2002 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: July 16, 2002 39. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 40. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), LQMC, Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. The design storm shall be either the 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 41. The applicant shall meet the individual -lot retention provisions of Chapter 13.24.120 (Drainage), sub -section "K.", LQMC. Stormwater shall normally be retained in common retention basin(s) as shown on the Tentative Tract Map. 42. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rete shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise. 43. Nuisance water shall be retained on site through an acceptable manner as approved by the City Engineer. 44. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 45. For on -site common retention basins, retention depth shall not exceed six feet and side slopes shall not exceed 3:1. Deeper retention basins may be approved but shall meet the criteria established in Engineering Bulletin 97-03 (Amendment #1). 46. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to Section 9.100.040(B)(7), LQMC. 4L A5 P:\STAN\n 30521 pc coa.wpd Printed July 8, 2002 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: July 16, 2002 47. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries, levels or frequencies in any area outside the development. 48. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 49. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. UTILITIES 50. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.110 (Utilities), LQMC. 51. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 52. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 53. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 54. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access For Individual Properties And Development), LQMC for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 41.3 40 P:\S"PAN\tt 30521 pc coa.wpd Printed July 8, 2002 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: July 16, 2002 55. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1 /8" batter and a minimum height of 0.1'. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 56. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Washington Street - (Major Arterial) (a) 6-foot wide meandering sidewalk along the entire frontage adjacent to the Tentative Tract boundary. (b) Traffic signal at the Project's main entry at Via Sevilla and Washington Street when warrants are met. The Applicant is responsible for 50 % of the cost to design and install the traffic signal if complementing cost share from development on other side of street is available at time signal is required. Applicant shall enter into a SIA to post security for 50 % of the cost to design and install the traffic signal prior to issuance of an on -site grading permit; the security shall remain in full force and effect until the signal is actually installed by the applicant or the developer on the other side of the street. If the land on the other side of the street does not have an approved project connecting to the subject intersection, the applicant shall pay 100% of the cost to design and install the signalization for the resulting "T" intersection. If, however, the applicant's development trails the progress of the development on the other side of the street, the applicant shall be responsible for 50% of the cost as previously stated. 2) Miles Avenue - (Primary Arterial) Widen thenorth side of the Miles Avenue to a 43 foot half width along the entire frontage adjacent to the Tentative Tract Map boundary. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to facilitate the widening. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant 41- P:\STAN\tt 30521 pc coampd Printed July 8, 2002 " 4 7 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: July 16, 2002 components such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, except for street lights. Other significant new improvements required for installation in, or adjacent, to the subject right of way include: (a) 6-foot wide meandering sidewalk. (b) The applicant shall modify the existing median at the project entry to accommodate a left turn in configuration while prohibiting left turns out. All improvements to Washington Street and Miles Avenue shall be completed with the Phase I Tract Improvements. 3) Via Caliente, Bradford Circle, Forbes Circle and Via Coronado - Local Street, 60 foot Right of Way. The applicant shall complete the necessary street improvement and cul-de-sac improvements for a 40 foot wide, curb to curb street section. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Street "A" Entrance - Construct full improvements within a 81-foot right-of- way, which shall be divided into two 30-foot traveled ways with a 20-foot center landscaped median. 2) Street "L" Entrance - Construct full improvements within a 57 foot right of way, which shall be divided into two 22 foot traveled ways with a 10 foot center landscaped median. 3) Interior Private Streets - Construct full 36-foot wide travel width improvements within a 37-foot right-of-way where the residential streets are double loaded. C. PRIVATE CUL DE SACS 1) Private Cul-de-sacs shall be constructed to Riverside County Standard 800 for symmetrical Cul-de-sacs and Standard 800A for offset Cul-de-sacs, and both shall be constructed with a 38-foot curb radius, measured gutter flow -line to gutter flow -line. 415 4 3 P:\STAN\tt 30521 pc coa.wpd Printed July 8, 2002 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: July 16, 2002 57. The entry streets shall be designed to accommodate a gated entry. The design shall provide for a two -car minium stacking capacity for inbound traffic; and shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non -entry accepted vehicles.) The applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a scale of 1 " = 10', demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry into the development can safely make a "U" Turn back out onto the respective street. Two lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of each gated entry, one lane shall be dedicated for residents, and one lane for visitors. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 58. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential Collector Secondary Arterial Primary Arterial Major Arterial 3.0" a.c./4.50" c.a.b. 4.0"/5.00" 4.0"/6.00" 4.5"/6.00" 5.5"/6.50" or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 59. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Primary Entry - Via Sevilla: Full right in, right out, left in and left out turning movements. B. Primary Entry - Miles Avenue: Right in, right out and left in (only) turning movements. Left turn out turning movements will be prohibited. The applicant shall modify the existing median island on Miles Avenue to accommodate the proposed left in turning movement. 416 PASTAN\tt 30521 pc coa.wpd A3 Printed July 8, 2002 - Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: July 16, 2002 60. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 61. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 62. Corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawing #805, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 63. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements. CONSTRUCTION 64. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPING 65. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC. 66. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. 67. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit the landscape plans for approval by the Community Development Department (CDD), prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking has been completed by CDD, the applicant shall 417 P:\STAN\tt 30521 pc coa.wpd Printed July 8, 2002 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: July 16, 2002 obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner, prior to submittal for signature by the City Engineer. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 68. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. PUBLIC SERVICES 69. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. QUALITY ASSURANCE 70. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures that meet with the approval of the City Engineer. 71. The applicant shall employ, or retain, qualified engineers, surveyors, and such other appropriate professionals as are required to provide the expertise with which to prepare and sign accurate record drawings, and to provide adequate construction supervision. 72. The applicant shall arrange for, and bear the cost of, all measurements, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program, but which may be required by the City, as evidence that the construction materials and methods employed comply with the plans, specifications and other applicable regulations. 73. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing," "As -Built" or "As - Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all AutoCAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. MAINTENANCE 74. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 418 L 5 1. P:ASTAN\tt 30521 pc coa.wpd Printed July 8, 2002 Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: July 16, 2002 75. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. FEES AND DEPOSITS 76. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 77. Prior to issuance of a grading permit or any earth moving activities, applicant shall pay a fringe -toed lizard mitigation fee of $600.00 per acre to the City of La Quinta. 78. Prior to final map approval by the City Council, the property owner/developer shall comply with the Parkland Dedication requirements by payment of in -lieu fees as set forth in Section 13.48 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. 79. Within 48 hours after review by the City Council, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Community Development Department a check made out to the "County of Riverside" in the amount of $1314.00 to permit the filing and posting of the Notice of Determination for EA 2002-455 as required by the California Environmental Quality Act. ENVIRONMENTAL 80. The applicant/developer shall comply with the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan attached to Environmental Assessment 2002-455. FIRE DEPARTMENT 81. Approved standard fire hydrants, located at each intersection and spaced 330 feet apart with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for a two hour duration at 20 PSI. 82. Blue dot reflectors shall be placed in the street 8 inches from the centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 83. Gate entrances shall be at least two feet wider than the width of the travel lanes serving that gate. Any gate providing access from a road to a driveway shall be located at least 35 feet setback from the roadway and shall open to allow a vehicle 419 P:ASTAN\tt 30521 pc coa.wpd Printed July 8, 2002 �� Resolution 2002- Conditions of Approval - Recommended Tentative Tract Map 30521 Lido Equity Partners Adopted: July 16, 2002 to stop without obstructing traffic on the road. Where a one-way road with a single traffic lane provides access to a gate entrance, a 40 foot turning radius shall be used. 84. Gates shall be equipped with a rapid entry system (KNOX). Gate pins shall be rated with a shear pin force, not to exceed 30 pounds. Gates activated by the rapid entry system shall remain open until closed by the rapid entry system. Contact the Fire Department for an application (760 863-8886). 85. Provide to the Fire Department, two sets of water plans for plan check prior to recordation of the final Tract Map. 86. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted the appropriate water agency prior to any combustibles being placed on an individual lot. MISCELLANEOUS 87. There shall be no two story units constructed in the tract. 88. The applicant shall retain a traffic engineer to provide traffic calming measures for the the tract to the satifaction of the Public Works Department, prior to recordation of the final map. 89. At perimeter boundary locations where the existing wall is too short to comply with the City's wall height requirement with respect to the new lots within the new tract, the Applicant shall first contact the owner(s) of the existing wall and offer to: 1) increase the existing wall height if the existing wall is structurally capable of handling the increased height, or 2) remove the existing a wall and replace it with a new wall that is high enough to comply with the LQMC. If the existing wall owner(s) do not unanimously consent to one of the two alternatives identified in the previous paragraph after a reasonable amount of time and coordinating effort has been given to achieving a mutual solution, the applicant may construct a second wall adjacent to the existing wall provided the new wall is aesthetically consistent with a majority of the wall aesthetics encountered. The gap between the new wall and the existing wall shall be filled with pea gravel and capped if the gap is larger than two inches (2"). 420 v53 P:ASTAN\tt 30521 pe coa.wpd Printed July 8, 2002 ATTACHMENT #3 Planning Commission Minutes June 25, 2002 4. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the ublic participation portion of the public hearing and opened the tter for Commission discussion. 5. There ing no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissl ers Robbins/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 02-070 approving Tentative Tract Map 29053, Extension #2, submitted. ROLL CALL: AYES: Com issioners Butler, Kirk, Robbins Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. C. Environmental Assessment 2002-455 General Plan Amendment 2002- 087, and Tentative Tract Map 30521; a request of Lido Equity Partners for Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for an Environmental Assessment, change of General Plan Land Use designation from Neighborhood Commercial to Low Density Residential for ten acres, and the subdivision of 43.6 acres into 147 single family and other miscellaneous lots located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Miles Avenue. 1 . Commissioner Robbins excused himself due to a potential conflict of interest and left the dias. 2. Chairman Abels opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3. Chairman Abels asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Kirk asked if the changes in the circulation pattern are due to the nearby residents. Staff stated yes. 4. Commissioner Tyler asked why the lots could not be graded to the same height as the existing lots that abut this project on the east between Bradford Circle and Forbes Circle. Also, did a sound study require the sound wall. Staff stated the study was done in compliance with the environmental study. Commissioner Tyler asked about the height restrictions on Miles Avenue. Staff stated the height limit was 22 feet within 150 feet. Commissioner Tyler asked why the gate off Via Sevilla could not be constructed earlier than anticipated (Phase 4). G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\6-25-02.wpd 4 42 '.; 5 7 Planning Commission Minutes June 25, 2002 5. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Abels asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Mike Smith, Warner Engineering, gave a presentation on the project and stated they have no problems with the conditions as submitted by staff. The reason for the height of the lots is due to the contours of the site. 6. Commissioner Kirk asked why the phasing was changed. Mr. Smith stated it was the applicant's request. It is based on how the marketing people believe they can sell the homes. Commissioner Kirk asked if the gate on Via Sevilla could be constructed earlier than planned. Mr. Smith stated it was probably based on financing ability. 7. Commissioner Butler stated that if there was a five foot wall and a one foot differential in height currently, they would need to put a one foot extension on the existing wall. Mr. Smith stated that was true. 8. Commissioner Tyler asked about the type of homes to be built. Mr. Mike Osborne, developer, stated the homes would be one story high single family residences. 9. Commissioner Butler asked for clarification on the turning movements. Staff clarified it would be right turn in/out and left turn in on Miles Avenue. 10. Commissioner Butler asked about the phasing of the wall. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated a project is normally conditioned to have the entire perimeter wall installed with the first phase. 11. Chairman Abels asked if anyone else would like to address the Commission on this project. Mr. Rudy Acosta, 78-595 Carnes Circle, stated he resides at the end of the cul-de-sac on Carnes Circle, and his experience with prior developers in the area has been anything but pleasant. Currently there is a six foot wall between himself and the proposed development. Is this proposal planning to share the existing wall. They do not want the same experience they had with the Santiago development which ended up with a 8-9 foot wall. He also asked what the rear yard setbacks would be. Another concern is that the construction be 42.E G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\6-25-02.wpd 5 ) Planning Commission Minutes June 25, 2002 monitored so they do not get trash into their backyards. Staff stated the rear yard setback is 20 feet. The Typical lot width is 70 feet and the depth is 110 feet. 12. Ms. Linda Broom, 78-380 Via Sevilla, asked where the primary entry to the project would be located as she is concerned about the speed traffic traveling along Via Sevilla. It was her understanding that her development was trying to install a gate to their project in the future, and wondered how it would affect this development. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated it is impossible to gate a project with a public use street as her development currently has. Ms. Broom asked if a speed bump or some other method to slow the traffic could be installed. Also, when would the traffic light be constructed at Washington Street. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated that the signal would be installed when the warrants are high enough to require the installation along with cooperation of with the City of Indian Wells. In regard to traffic calming methods, the City has different alternatives that could be considered. 13. There being no further public comment, Chairman Abels closed the public participation portion of the public hearing and opened the matter for Commission discussion. 14. Commissioner Kirk stated he supports the project and compliments the applicant on their efforts to resolve the circulation issues that had been raised prior to this meeting. He would also like to ensure the project would not have double walls and asked if a condition could be added. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated they do have to have the consent of each property owner on the east side of the existing wall before any modifications can be made. Second, the existing wall has to be determined to be structurally sound. The alternative is to tear down the existing wall and build a new one again, with the consent of the existing property owners, or build the double wall. Commissioner Kirk asked if the project could be conditioned to be single story. Staff stated they are restricted to 22 feet, but they could build a two story house within that height. 15. Mr. Mike Osborne, stated that all homes are proposed to be single story and he would not be opposed to a condition being added. 425 G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\6-25-02.wpd 6 v 5 ,-3 Planning Commission Minutes June 25, 2002 16. Commissioner Butler stated the one foot grade difference is an issue in regard to the properties to the east. If the one foot were removed, would it not resolve the problem? Mr. Osborne stated the foot is needed for water run-off. Discussion followed regarding the grading and wall height. Mr. Joseph Swain, partner in the development, stated that to arbitrarily lower the pads without knowing the effect it would have on the development is difficult as it could cause some major drainage problems. If they can lower the pads without effecting the drainage, they will do so. 17. Commissioner Kirk asked if traffic controls could be installed on Via Sevilla to address the concerns of the residents on Via Sevilla. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated it is a policy issue that the City Council has not adopted to date. There are other speed control methods that could be used. Staff is currently collecting data in this area to determine the travel speed. Speed bumps can cause more problems than issues they solve. In addition, it is not a preference of the Fire Department. 18. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Kirk/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-071 recommending certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2002-455, subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. 19. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Kirk to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-072 recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 2002-087, subject to the findings. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. 20. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Butler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2002-073, recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 30521, subject to the findings and conditions as amended: 4"-)r G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\6-25-02.wpd 7 6 1 Planning Commission Minutes June 25, 2002 A. Condition #36: Lot heights shall be as similar to the adjoining development pad heights without affecting the drainage on the project site without exceeding one foot in height. B. Condition #87: There shall be no two story units constructed in the tract. C. Condition #88: The applicant shall retain a traffic engineer to provide traffic calming measures for the tract to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department, prior to recordation of the final map. D. Condition #89: At the perimeter boundary locations where the existing wall is too short to comply with the City's wall height requirement with respect to the new lots within the new tract, the applicant shall first contact the owner(s) of the existing wall and offer to: 1) increase the existing wall height if the existing wall is structurally capable of handling the increased height; or 2) remove the existing wall and replace it with a new wall that is high enough to comply with the LQMC. If the existing wall owner(s) do not unanimously consent to one of these two alternatives, after a reasonable amount of time and coordinating effort has been given to achieving a mutual solution, the applicant may construct a second wall adjacent to the existing wall provided the new wall is aesthetically consistent with a majority of the wall aesthetics encountered. The gap between the new wall and the existing wall shall be filled with pea gravel and capped if the gap is larger than two inches (2"). ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Butler, Kirk, Tyler, and Chairman Abels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Robbins. ABSTAIN: None. Chairman A els recessed the meeting at 8:33 p.m. and reconvened at 8:37 p.m. CommissioneeNFobbins rejoined the Commission. E. Site " evelo ment Permit 2002-743; a request of Mel Rudman/Prest Vuksi\suare itects for review of development plans for construction of a 5,000 foot commercial office building located on the southeastcorneashington Street and Avenue 47. 4 6' G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\6-25-02.wpd 8 T4ty,l 4 w'*PQ" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE:July 16, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing on Adoption of a Resolution of the City Council Approving the Setting and Placement of Residential Waste Collection and Service Fees on the Tax Rolls for Residentially Developed Property and Adoption of a Resolution Setting Commercial and Roll -Off Waste Collection and Service Fees RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: 3 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council ordering the levy and collection of assessments for refuse collection and recycling services from residential properties within the City pursuant to La Quinta Charter and Municipal Code Chapter 6.04. 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council setting the schedule of fees and charges for the collection, recycling (AB 939) and disposal of rubbish and garbage from commercial, construction, and industrial (roll -off) establishments and certain residential properties (direct bill) within the City. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The City adopted Amended and Restated Agreements for the Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Municipal Solid Waste and the Collection and Recycling of Recyclable Materials on July 5, 2000, with Waste Management of California, Inc. Under consideration by the Council is both tax rates that will be placed on the tax rolls and the commercial roll -off rates that will be billed directly by Waste Management. The breakdown of the new rates for the tax rolls is as follows: VR G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\Wastefeeincrease. wpd OLD RATE NEW RATE Service Rate $ 7.14 $ 7.24 Dump Fee $2.34 $2.34 AB 939 $0.61 $0.61 Monthly Rate $10.09 $10.19 Yearly Rate $121.08 $122.28 This represents a yearly increase of $1.20 ($0.10) per month) on the tax rolls for residential collection. The commercial and roll -off rates which are direct bill by Waste Management have all increased by 1 .35 % and are listed in the attached Resolution. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council ordering the levy and collection of assessments for refuse collection and recycling services from residential properties within the City pursuant to La Quinta Charter and Municipal Code Chapter 6.04. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council setting the schedule of fees and charges for the collection, recycling (AB 939) and disposal of rubbish and garbage from commercial, construction, and industrial (roll -off) establishments and certain residential properties (direct bill) within the City; or 2. Do not adopt Resolutions of the City Council ordering the levy and collection of assessments for refuse collection and recycling services from residential properties or setting the schedule of fees and charges for the collection, recycling (AB 939) and disposal of rubbish and garbage from commercial, construction, and industrial (roll -off) establishments and certain residential properties (direct bill) within the City; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, 429 erry erman ommunity Development Director G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\Wastefeeincrease. wpd Approved for submission by: homas P. Genovese, City Manager 4-0 3 G:\WPDOCS\CC Stf Rpts\Wastefeeincrease. wpd RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING THE SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR THE COLLECTION, RECYCLING (AB 939) AND DISPOSAL OF RUBBISH AND GARBAGE FROM COMMERCIAL, CONSTRUCTION, AND INDUSTRIAL (ROLL -OFF) ESTABLISHMENTS AND CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES (DIRECT BILL) WITHIN THE CITY COMMERCIAL WASTE FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore adopted Ordinance 314 ("Ordinance") establishing standards for the collection and disposal of refuse, trash, rubbish and other forms of solid waste; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the disposal and/or collection of refuse, trash, rubbish, or other solid waste is a service to be performed in the City in accordance with the provision of this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 6.04.010 of said Ordinance and California Public Resources Code Section 40059(a)(1), an exclusive franchise has been granted to Waste Management of the Desert ("Contractor") for the collection, transportation, recycling, composting, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial (roll -off) establishments within the City; and WHEREAS, Section 6.04.135 of said Ordinance provides that the City Council shall establish by Resolution the Schedule of Fees that can be charged by Contractor for solid waste collection, disposal and recycling services; and WHEREAS, California Public Resources Code Section 41900 requires the City to demonstrate that it has a funding source, or sources, to pay the costs of preparing, adopting, implementing, and administering local recycling and source reduction programs; and WHEREAS, the City has heretofore adopted and imposed, in accordance with Section 49109 of the California Public Resources Code an AB 939 Administrative Fee upon commercial, construction, and industrial establishments as set forth in the Schedule of Fees; and WHEREAS, the City and Contractor desire to leave no doubts as to their respective roles, and that Contractor, not City, shall direct bill for services rendered to all commercial, construction and industrial establishments, as well as those residential properties that are not currently assessed on the property tax roll; and G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\Waste-Comfeeincr.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Commercial Waste Fee Schedule Adopted: July 16. 2002 WHEREAS, at the time stated in the notice, to wit: July 16 2002, at 7:00 p.m., this City Council conducted the hearing on said report and on the adoption of this Resolution, heard and considered all objections, or protests to the report; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California as follows: SECTION 1. The refuse service rates for commercial, construction, and industrial (roll -off) establishments and those residential properties not assessed on the property tax roll are set forth in Exhibit "A", to be effective July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003. The Contractor shall not charge, or demand rates for such refuse collection services in excess of those set forth in the current approved rate schedule. SECTION 2. This City Council hereby finds that the collection of such charges are in the best interests of the users and the City of La Quinta. SECTION 3. The report filed by the City Clerk with this City Council contains the amount of the charges for the purposes of commercial waste collection and roll -off service fees for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. SECTION 4. The said commercial and roll -off refuse collection charges shall be for the Fiscal Year 2002-2003. SECTION 5. The Contractor is authorized to bill monthly in advance to all commercial, construction, and industrial (roll -off) establishments and those residential properties that are not assessed on the property tax roll. Contractor shall provide an itemized bill distinctly showing charges for all classifications of service including, but not limited to the charges for late payment, re -delivery fees, charges for additional containers, and any fees imposed upon by the City. SECTION 6. The Contractor shall collect and remit to the City on a monthly basis an AB 939 Administrative Fee from all commercial, construction and industrial (roll -off) establishments, as well as those residential properties that are directly billed by Contractor. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16th day of July, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: 43" ABSENT: G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\Waste-Comfeeincr.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Commercial Waste Fee Schedule Adopted: July 16. 2002 ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PEI A, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON , City Attorney City of La Quinta, California t v 0 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\Waste-Comfeeincr.wpd EXHIBIT "A" COMMERCIAL SERVICE - CITY OF LA QUINTA 100% FRANCHISED JULY 2002 2 YARD SERVICE Pick Up Per Week Service Rate Dump Fee AB939 Monthly Charge 1 $ 49.91 17.47 3.88 t 71.26 2 86.94 33.29 7.76 127.99 3 122.15 49.21 $11.63 182.99 4 157.16 $ 64.99 $15.51 237.66 5 192.23 77.59 $19.39 289.21 6 227.57 EXTRA EMPTY $ 29.61 3 YARD SERVICE Pick Up Per Week Service Rate Dump Fee AB939 Monthly Charge 1 62.64 $ 25.01 5.82 93.47 2 107.81 48.28 $11.63 167.72 3 152.01 70.90 $17.45 240.36 4 192.91 93.46 $23.27 $ 309.64 5 236.42 116.54 $29.07 382.03 6 278.45 EXTRA EMPTY $ 40.67 4 YARD SERVICE Pick Up Per Week Service Rate Dump Fee AB939 Monthly Charge 1 85.66 $ 33.69 7.66 127.11 2 $ 133.99 63.37 $15.51 212.87 3 184.15 92.94 $23.27 $ 300.36 4 234.49 122.84 $31.01 388.34 5 282.10 $ 152.32 $38.76 473.18 6 328.64 EXTRA EMPTY $ 55.03 6 YARD SERVICE Pick Up Per Week Service Rate Dump Fee AB939 Monthly Charge 1 128.51 50.10 11.63 $ 190.24 2 201.00 96.18 23.27 320.45 3 276.18 141.13 34.89 452.20 4 351.98 186.09 $46.51 584.58 5 423.16 231.85 58.14 $ 713.15 6 492.99 EXTRA EMPTY $ 82.09 J 7 43,1 GAWPDOCS\CCReso-COA\Waste-Comfeeincr.wpd COMMERCIAL SERVICE - CITY OF LA QUINTA 100% FRANCHISED JULY 2002 OTHER CHARGES New Start Fee $5.96 Re -Start Fee $15.64 Delivery Fee $16.85 Locked Enclosure $1 5.49 Bin Pull -Out> 20' $27.41 Locking Container $53.49 Replacement Locking Bar $35.70 Saturday (for service <6x/2wk) $22.24 COMMERCIAL SERVICE - CITY OF LA QUINTA REFUSE COLLECTION RATE AND DISPOSAL CHARGE JULY 1, 2002 ROLL OFF RATE PER PULL SERVICE 20 YARDS $ 86.58 30 YARDS $122.47 40 YARDS $144.91 * Plus dump fees charged at $32.17 * Plus AB939 fees charged at $13.10/ton remitted to City * Delivery Charge $16.85 * Extra Trip $47.91 Note: Compactor accounts will be charged at three times (3x) the basic roll off rate OTHER FEES - RESIDENTIAL - COMMERCIAL - AND ROLL OFF Start Fee $ 5.96 Restart Fee $15.64 Returned check $20.86 4 3,� � G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\Waste-Comfeeincr.wpd CITY OF LA QUINTA WASTE MANAGEMENT DIRECT BILLING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY Single Family Home/Townhouse Condominium/Mobile Home all V M a, in, i Individual Residence - Curb Service $ 8.47 $ 2.31 $ 0.61 $ 11.39 Waste Management Billing Individual Residence - Walk-in Service $ 11.85 $ 2.25 $ 0.61 $ 14.71 Waste Management Billing (2 cans, bags or bundles, up to 60 ft. distance) • Any association of homeowners must select identical level of service to be provided. Monday service is to be based on availability of contractor/franchisee to provide necessary equipment and/or personnel. If Monday service is required by the association, a 10% premium will be added to the basic rate. The level of service may be changed once annually. • Tax roll billing requires 100% mandatory service year-round. • The basic curb rate is charged via tax roll, and the incremental cost is billed directly by contractor. • Additional waste container (Waste Management Billing) $5.63 43q; G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\Waste-Comfeeincr.wpd RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR REFUSE COLLECTION AND RECYCLING SERVICES FROM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY PURSUANT TO LA QUINTA CHARTER AND MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 6.04 RESIDENTIAL WASTE FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore adopted Ordinance 314 ("Ordinance") establishing standards for the collection and disposal of refuse, trash, rubbish and other forms of solid waste; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the disposal and/or collection of refuse, trash, rubbish, or other solid waste is a service to be performed in the City in accordance with the provision of this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 6.04.010 of said Ordinance and California Public Resources Code Section 40059(a)(1), an exclusive franchise has been granted to Waste Management of the Desert ("Contractor") for the collection, transportation, recycling, composting, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial (roll -off) establishments within the City; and WHEREAS, Section 6.04.135 of said Ordinance provides that the City Council shall establish by Resolution the Schedule of Fees that can be charged by Contractor for solid waste collection, disposal and recycling services; and WHEREAS, California Public Resources Code Section 41900 requires the City to demonstrate that it has a funding source, or sources, to pay the costs of preparing, adopting, implementing, and administering local recycling and source reduction programs; and WHEREAS, the City has heretofore adopted and imposed an AB 939 Administrative Fee as part of the assessment for refuse collection and recycling services paid annually by eligible parcels within the City; and WHEREAS, the City has retained MBIA MuniFinancial Services, Inc., as the Engineer for the purpose of assisting with the preparation of the annual assessment to be levied and collection upon eligible parcels of land within the City, and the City Council has approved such assessments; and hY 31 k;1 0 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\Waste-Resfeeincr.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Residential Waste Fee Schedule Adopted: July 16, 2002 WHEREAS, the City Council desires to levy and collect assessment s to pay for Refuse Collection and Recycling Services rendered to eligible parcels within the City for the period commencing July 1, 2002 and ending June 30, 2003. WHEREAS, at the time stated in the notice, to wit: July 16, 2002, at 7:00 p.m., this City Council conducted the hearing on said report and on the adoption of this Resolution, heard and considered all objections, or protests to the report; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby confirm the written report, made by the City Manager, of the amounts of charges for City furnished garbage and refuse collection and disposal services for the forthcoming year, itemized for each separate residential parcel of land attached hereto and marked Exhibit "A". SECTION 2. This City Council hereby finds that the collection of such charges, together with general taxes, are in the best interests of the users and the City of La Quinta. SECTION 3. The said refuse collection service charges for each parcel of land shall constitute a special assessment against that parcel and shall constitute a lien against such parcel of land, in accordance with Section 5473.5 of the Health and Safety Code of California. SECTION 4. The said residential collection charges shall be used to pay for the refuse collection service for the calendar year starting January 1, 2003 through December 31. 2003. SECTION 5. The rate fees as noted in Exhibit "A" for garbage and refuse collection and disposal services for residences which consists of curb service, once per week pickups for municipal solid waste (household waste), green waste and recycling materials. SECTION 6. The report filed by the City Clerk with this City Council contains a description of each parcel of real property to be charged, and the amount of the charges for purposes of refuse collection for each such parcel in the Fiscal Year 2002- 2003 and such charges are correct and proper, and said report is therefore, approved and adopted. All objections to said report are hereby overruled. After July 16, 2002, the City Clerk shall file with the County Auditor of the County of Riverside a copy of said report with a statement endorsed thereon over her signature that it has been duly 43R adopted by this City Council together with a certified copy of this Resolution. I!t1. G:\WPDOMCCReso-COMWaste-Resfeeincr.wpd City Council Resolution 2002- Residential Waste Fee Schedule Adopted: July 16, 2002 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16th day of July, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON , City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 439 12 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\Waste-Resfeeincr.wpd City Council Resolution 2002-_ Residential Waste Fee Schedule Adopted: July 16, 2002 EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF LA QUINTA REFUSE COLLECTION RATE AND DISPOSAL CHARGE TAX BILLING - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY -� Single Family Home/Townhouse Q 00. Condominium/Mobile Home Q Individual Residence - Curb Service $ 7.24 $ 2.34 $ 0.61 $ 10.19 Tax Roll Billing Individual Residence - Curb Service $ 8.47 $ 2.31 $ 0.61 $ 11.39 Waste Management Billing Individual Residence - Walk-in Service $ 10.63 $ 2.27 $ 0.61 $ 13.51 Tax Roll Billing (2 cans, bags or bundles, up to 60 ft. distance) Individual Residence - Walk-in Service $ 11.85 $ 2.25 $ 0.61 $ 14.71 Waste Management Billing (2 cans, bags or bundles, up to 60 ft. distance) • Any association of homeowners must select identical level of service to be provided. Monday service is to be based on availability of contractor/franchisee to provide necessary equipment and/or personnel. If Monday service is required by the association, a 10% premium will be added to the basic rate. The level of service may be changed once annually. • Tax roll billing requires 100% mandatory service year-round. • The basic curb rate is charged via tax roll, and the incremental cost is billed directly by contractor. • Additional waste container (Waste Management Billing) $5.63 G:\WPDOCS\CCReso-COA\Waste-Resfeeincr.wpd